Laserfiche WebLink
7/8/57 <br />1, <br />of Concord Avenue from 't'J.60th Street to Southview Lane. <br />Tabulation of Assessment at $6,035.56 as against 3,702.8 Assessable Feet, for <br />an Assessable Cost of $1.63 per Assessable Foot, compared with Improvement <br />Hearing Estimate of $2.12+ Mr. X. Forder, 5932 Concord Avenue, was present to <br />support his letter of objection to assessment for reason that he does not have <br />proper drainage. Engineer Zikan presented 1953 street profile, showing that <br />hk. Forder's lot was below street grade at that time, but made a proposal to <br />raise the burm at the lot's edge, to prevent wash. <br />be levied as read, with understanding that burm at 5932 Concord will be built up. <br />Motion seconded by Bank and carried. (See Resolution of later in meeting, formally <br />levying assessment). <br />2. PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-80--Blacktopping <br />of 1.52nd Street from Highway No. 169 to Bedford Avenue. <br />was read at $4,510.31, as against 1,097.4 Assessable Foot, for $4.11 per Assessable <br />Foot, compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $3.81. <br />the increase in cost was due to about a 5% overage in excavation. No oral <br />objections were filed, and no written objections had been received prior to the <br />HeaSng. <br />3. <br />W.58th Street from France Avenue to Brookview Avenue. <br />was read at $4,703.01, as against 3,053.9 Assessable Feet, for $1.54 per Assessable <br />Foot, compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $2.48. <br />were registered at the Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior <br />thereto. <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-85--Blacktopping of <br />Ashcroft Avenue from W.59th St. to W.6Oth St. Tabulation of Assessment was read <br />at $1,796.70, as against 1,197.8 Assessable Feet, for $1.50 per Assessable Foot, <br />compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $2.74. No written objections were <br />reported by the Clerk, and no oral objections were registered at the Hearing. <br />(See Resolution of latex in meeting levying assessment). <br />5. <br />Lake Ridge Road. Tabulation of Assessment was read at $1.482.37; assessment to <br />be levied on a "percentage of total" basis as per agreement by owners of benefited <br />properties. No objections were registered. <br />levying assessment). <br />5. <br />Ornamental Street Lights on W.5lst Street at Indianola and Juanita Avenues. <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read at $1,109.24, as against 1,760.7 Assessable <br />Feet, for $.63 per Assessable Foot, compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of <br />$ .828. <br />later in meeting levying assessment). <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. B-34--Curb and Gutter <br />in Ridgeview Drive from Danens Drive to Meadow Ridge. Tabulation of Assessment <br />was read at $2,432.00, as against 800 Assessable Feet, for $3.04 per Assessable <br />Foot, compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $3.46. <br />5245 Danens Drive and JOE. IVithrow,5248 Meadow Ridge, and developer E.C. Stow, <br />objected to the assessment on the grounds that - 1. Curb and Gutter has washed <br />out, been replaced once, and is washing out again and will not be satisfactory <br />until a new base is put under it. 2. This is in effect a storm sewer and should <br />be assessed against the drainage area rather than to abutting properties only. <br />Council informed audience that it does not have the power, now, to assessL,against <br />the drainage area; that assessment can be levied against only those properties <br />included in the notice for the improvement hearing. Chvners then suggested that <br />they be given relief on a future blacktopping assessment; and the suggestion was <br />also made that the street be oiled from time to time before sewer construction, <br />to prevent further wash; that it be blacktopped immediately after sewer con- <br />struction--but Engineer Zikan stated blacktopping is not advisable until after <br />the street has settled. <br />ment could be reached this evening, Trustee Bank suggested that Manager and Engineer <br />meetlwith owners to attempt to arrive at a fair solution to the problem, then <br />moved deferring levy of special assessment pending report of meeting. Motion <br />seconded by Fronk and carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-76--Blacktopping <br />IAanager Hyde read the <br />Fronk moved that assessment <br />I Tabulation of Assessment <br />Mr. Hyde explained <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting levying assessment). <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-81--Blacktopping of <br />Tabulation of Assessment <br />No oral objections <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting levying assessment]. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-@6--Blacktopping of <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSIENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. L-2-Installation of <br />Neither oral nor written objection vias registered. (See Resolution of <br />Messrs. C.E. Cleland, <br />Because it was apparent that no agreement on the assess- <br />Fronk then offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESShENTS <br />FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOS. A-76, A-80, A-81, <br />A-85, A-86 AND L-2 <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, as follows: <br />for STREET IMPROVEMENTS A-76, A-80, A-81, A-85, A-86 AND L-2, and each of them, <br />have been properly calculated in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statujxs Section 412.441; that notice has been duly published as required by law, <br />that this Council would meet to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to amend <br />said proposed assessments as might be necessary, and to adopt the same by resolution; <br />1. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the proposed assessments