Laserfiche WebLink
2/24/58 <br />Southdale Road, objected to the proposed rezoning,and also/the proposal for office <br />buildings on France between 66th and 70th Streets, stating that when he purchased <br />his property he was given to understand that the area between France and Valley ~ <br />View Road and 66th and 70th Streets was to be landscaped as a park--that the <br />contractor from he purchased had so informed him. He was informed by the Council <br />that the tract between 66th and 70th Street had been rezoned to "Regional Shopping <br />District" in 1953, together with Southdale Center and before homes were built or <br />lots placed on sale for Southdale First Addition, and that this had been a matter <br />of record for some five years. <br />motel, and Mr. Crabb reported it is intended to be an 80-unit building; that it <br />will have a swimming pool of its own (this last came as an answer to a question <br />as to whether "the Village is building a swimming pool for the motel".) <br />other objections were registered at the Hearing, and no written objections had <br />been received prior thereto. Bank offered the following Ordinance, moving for <br />waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as read: <br />to <br />Question was raised about the size of proposed <br />No <br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-28 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE <br />OF EDINA BY ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL REGIONAL <br />SHOPPING DISTRICT <br />THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: <br />Section 1. <br />Revised Ordinances of the Village of 'Edina, as amended, is hereby further <br />amended by adding at the end of paragraph 1 of said Section 6 an additional <br />sub-paragraph as follows : <br />Section 6, Regional Shopping District, of Ordinance No. 261 of the <br />Section 2, <br />and publication. <br />All that portion of the Southeast One Quarter (SE1/4) of the <br />Northeast One Quarter (NE1/4) of Section 30, Township 28, <br />Range 24 bounded by France Avenue South, West 66th Street, <br />Valley View Road and West 64th Street, which has not <br />previously been rezoned by Ordinance No. 261-2 adopted <br />May 25, 1953." <br />This Ordinance shall be in effect immediately upon its passage <br />Bank's motion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as read was <br />seconded by Dickson, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: <br />Ordinance was adopted . Bank, aye; Dickson, aye; Kohler, aye; Tupa, Bredesen, aye; and the <br />19 <br />Mayor <br />Village Clerk <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PETITION FOR PERMIT TO FACE DWELLING ON BRITTANY ROAD RATHER <br />THAN ON ROYCAR ROAD, Lot 12, Block 10, Woodhill. Affidavit of Publication in <br />Edina-Morningside Courier February 13 and 20, and of Mailing said notice, were <br />submitted, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. <br />explained that his architect was unaware of facing restrictions and had drawn <br />plan for house facing Brittany Road; that plan will not fit lot, facing Roycar. <br />He presented a letter of assent to the proposed facing, signed by the Stevensons, <br />4817 Roycar Road, Henry T. Warner, 6636 Brittany Road, and R.L. Sheppard, 4816 <br />Roycar Road; and another letter of assent Krom the developers of Woodhill Addn., <br />Rees-Thomson-Scroggins, Inc. No objections were registered at the Hearing and <br />no written objections had been received prior thereto. <br />permit be granted was seconded by Dickson and carried. <br />Petitioner Dick Roos <br />Kohler's motion that <br />PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED ON PETITION TO REZONE FROM OPEN DEVELOPMENT AND AUTO- <br />MOBILE PARKING DISTRICT TO CO&UL"ITY STORE DISTRICT - SOUTHWEST CORNER AT W.50TH <br />STREET AND HALIFAX AVENUE. At this time petitioners and neighbors returned from <br />their meeting, and Council continued its Hearing. <br />Avenue, objected to "anything which will route more traffic onto Halifax Avenue <br />or which devaluate my property, which is what this will do in spite of anything <br />the proponents say*'. <br />plan will have as to Halifax Avenue traffic, and was told by the Shell Company <br />Engineer, and by hk. Bob Hicks, operator of the station, that the plan will <br />tend to route traffic back into 50th Street, rather than down Halifax. To PAr. <br />Kohler's statement that, in his opinion, the East island will route additional <br />traffic down Halifax, !Ar. Moss replied that it is not the intention to construct <br />this island at this time; that, if Council consents to rezoning, the Company will <br />be glad to agree not to build the island on Halifax Avenue without coming back to <br />the Council for. consideration. <br />Hyde about proposed screening and about the flood lights. They replied that <br />they will be glad to screen; that they have no intention of directing lights <br />into any neighbor's windows. <br />hoist, asking that something be done to muffle it. <br />exhaust can be directed into a dry well, which should solve problem. <br />Mr. A.E. Carlson, 5025 Halifax <br />Trustee Kohler inquired as to what effect the proposed <br />Petitioners were queried by Council and Manager <br />EiIrs. Anderson complained of the noise of the <br />§hell Engineer replied that <br />Manager