Laserfiche WebLink
23/18/58 241 <br />I <br />10. STREET IMPROVE€IEIJT NO. A-104 - BLkCKTOPPING - Mornandale Court in Victorsen's <br />Addition to ?lormandale Court. <br />Total Assessable Cost, as against 1,044.1 Assessable Feet, for $2.&3 per Assessable <br />Foot, as compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $3.50. No objections were <br />registered at the Hearing, and no twitten objections had been received prior thereto. <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting, approving assessment). <br />11. <br />Dead End. <br />to be assessed at the rate of $2.54 per Assessable Foot for Blacktop only; plus <br />G.69 per Assessable ~oot for Blacktop Curb, to those lots where it was constructed. <br />A delegation led by L?r. c. y?. Tucker, owner of Lot 1, Block 3, stated that the <br />blacktop curb is' of inferior construction; that it has been knocked down by <br />children playing on it; that, last fall when it was constructed, contractor <br />Craig Alexander informed one resident, in the presence of witaesses, that he <br />realized the job was not good and would tear it out and put in a new job. <br />A.F. Lytle, 6116 Ewing, stated that contractor had told him, personally, that the <br />job was not satisfactory, and that it would be done over; that, this spring, the <br />contractor had told him that there were no specifications for the job, and that <br />residents "could take it and like Mr. Lytle stated he had believed in Lke <br />Alexander and that he had delayed sodding his lawn pending some adjustment as to <br />the curbing; that he believes this curb job is a disgrace to the construction <br />industry. <br />spring, the contractor had been required to try to "straighten" the navy curb; <br />that the specifications are largely for "materials to be used"; that these jobs <br />are not successful as a rule. Asked if the job had been accepted, Mr, Zikan <br />reported that the contractor has been paid but that there is still recourse under <br />the performance bond. <br />periding a report from the contractor, <br />to September 8, was seconded by Dickson and carried. <br />stands at the top of the hill each time it rains, and asked that this also be <br />corrected. <br />12. STREET IIdPEiOVEiEIJT RO. A-106 - BLACKTOPPING - Glengarry Parkway from <br />Ayrshire Elvd. to E:vy. $69-212. <br />Assessable Cost of $5,528.52, as against 2,047.6 Assessable Feet, for $2.22 per <br />Assessable Foot9 conpared with Iriiprovement Hearing Estimate of $2070. <br />were registered at the Hearing, and no mitten objections had been received prior <br />thereto, <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read at $3,654.35 <br />STREET IMPBOVEIVIEFJT' NO. A-105 - BLACKTOPPING - Ewing Ave. from W.Glst St. to <br />Tabulation of Assessment'showed Total Assessable Cost to be $2,799.59, <br />Lk. <br />On a query from the council, Engineer Zikan explained that, this <br />Manager Hyde recommended that this Hearing be continued <br />Bank's motion, that Hearing be continued <br />Mr. Tucker stated that water <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read at 3 Total <br />i!o objections <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting, approving assessment) <br />13. <br />3~. to y~.53rd St. <br />$2,54E.&O as against 1,080 AsBessable Feet, for $2.36 per Assessable Foot, as <br />compared ni th Improvement Hearing Estimate of $3,26. <br />at the Hearing, and no written objections had been' received prior thereto. <br />Resolution of later in meetinq, armrovinq assessment) . <br />STREET II.IPEOVE'~iE!4T 132. B-49 - CURB X!D GUTTEE - Grandvievr Lane from I'J.52nd <br />P-.L Tabulation of Assessment showed Total Assessable Cost .to be <br />!\Io objections were registered <br />(See <br />-r 1. 14. STIXET I~.lPROV~E~IT B-50 - CURB k;3D GUTTE2 --Zenit'n Avenue from !!.60th St. <br />throuqh 6101 Zenith Avenue. Tabulation of Assessnent shoinred Total Assessable Cost - <br />to be $3,207.05 as against 1,309 Assessable Feet, for $2.45 per Assessable Foot, <br />compared with Improvement I-Iearing Estimate of $3. 1%. <br />at the Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior thcrsto. (See <br />iiesolutiion of later in meeting, approving assessment) . <br />15. STREET 1I:IFROVEKEIJT !b:Oe B-51 - CURB AND GUTTER - Drevr iivenue from 5900 arid 5901 <br />through 5920 and 5921 Drew Ave. Tabulation of Assessment was read at Total Assess- <br />able Cost of $2,145.00, as against 825 Assessable Feet, for $2.GO per iissessable <br />Foot, as coriipared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $3,1G. <br />registered at the Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior <br />.L t.nerato. 7 <br />16. STREET 1I:;PROVEJERT 110. .C'-72 - GRADING, GRAVELIb!G AND OILI131GIG. Benton Avenue <br />from Tracy itvenua to 5516 Benton Avenue. <br />total of $9,353.30 as against 1,700.6 Assessable Feet, for $4.92 per hssesaable <br />Foot as compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $5.50. <br />because of the scope of this work, assessment is proposed on a lO-year basis. <br />There were no objections registered at the Hearing, and no written objections <br />had been filed prior theretoo, (See Resolution of later in meeting, approving <br />assessment) e <br />17, STREET 1i.iPROVEIJETiT !IO. C-73 - GRADIXG, GBAVEING AIdD OILIKG - Van Euren <br />Avenue from Belmore Lane to Eialoney Avenue. <br />at $4,159.99 as against 1,195.4 Assessable Feet, for $3,48 per Assessable Foot, <br />as compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $3.32; this proposed to be on a <br />ten-year term. <br />Lots 9 and 10, Block 14, complained that a vertical bank, impossible "io mow, had <br />been left abutting his front yard. <br />suggested that the Village blade go in and fix this ups and it was agreed by <br />the Council that this should be done, <br />the Idearing, and no mitten objections had. been received prior thereto. (See <br />Resolution of later in meeting, approving assessment) . Later, two gentlemen <br />appeared, to complain that water stood at the bottom of.the hill, <br />explained that a storm sewer is needed in this areaa <br />No objections were registered <br />iIo objections were <br />(See FLssolution of later in meeting., approving assessment) . <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read in <br />It was noted that, <br />Tabulation of Assessment rras read <br />Itlr. Eangtson, 416 Van Buren Avenue, owner of part of Lot E and 0 <br />He asked that it be sloped, Manager Hyde <br />1\10 other objections were registered at <br />Mr. Hyde