Laserfiche WebLink
3/9/59 13P <br />\ 34 FT. WEST. <br />d, and Estimate of Cost was read at a Total of $5,512.63, for $3.32 Der <br />Vu-Graph Slide was shown of plan and property proposed to be <br />assessable foot. <br />fabor of the project. <br />objections had been received prior to the Hearing. <br />was seconded by Kohler and carried. <br />Improvements). <br />MI-. Clarence Smith, 5704 Bernard Place- expressed himself in <br />~ There were no objections from the floor, and no written <br />Tupa’s motion approving project <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting, Ordering <br />3. PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER IN BERNARD PLACE FROr.1 ln1.57TH ST. TO GROVE ST. : NORTH <br />SIDE OF GROVE ST. FROM BENJARD PLACE TO 134 FT. EAST AND 134 FT. WEST. <br />Slide was shown of plan and property proposed to be assessed, and Estimate of Cost <br />Vtr-Graph <br />was read at a Total of $4,743.38, for $3.24 per Assessable Foot. <br />objections from the floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing. <br />LIanager Hyde asked the Council to consider the possibility of assessing 6ver <br />a ten-year period (rather than the usual five-year term) on streets where <br />curb and gutter and blacktopping are installed in the same year. <br />this type of construction is to the Village interests, and a 10-year assessment <br />cuts- the yearly total to the taxpayer. Mr. Clarence Smith, 5704 Bernard Place, <br />talked in favor of this suggestion, and those members of the council present <br />were agreeable to it. <br />on record as favoring ten-year assessment for this and the Blacktopping project <br />for the same streets, was seconded by Tupa and carried. <br />is net an assessment hearing Council could not act, formally, for a ten-year <br />assessment. <br />There were no <br />He stated <br />Kohler’s motion, approving project and putting Council <br />Note: Inasmuch as this <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting, Ordering Improvements). <br />4. BLPtCI:T@PPIKG PROPOSED FOR VEST 61ST ST. FROM CODE AVE. TO HAI*?SEff E@FD, APPD <br />FORSLII4 DRIVE FROM W.61ST ST. TO HAiqSEb! ROAD. Vu-Graph Slide was shown of plan . <br />and property proposed to be assessed, and Estimate of Cost was read at a Total of <br />s12943&.55, for $3.19 per Assessable Foot. <br />floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing. <br />project was seconded by Tupa and carried. <br />Ordering Improvements). Idote: <br />to assessment method and term. <br />There were no objections from the <br />Kohler’s motion approving <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting, <br />See action on next project for information as <br />I <br />5, PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER IN WEST 61.3’. ST. FROM CODE AVE. TO HAI\!SEIJ ROAD, <br />NID FORSLIIJ DRIVE FROM W.61ST ST. TO HANSEh! ROAD. Vu-Graph Slide was shown of <br />plan and property proposed to be assessed, and Estimate of Cost was read at a <br />Total of $12,043.50, for $3.09 per Assessable Foot. There were no objections <br />from the floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing. <br />explained that, because of the odd shape of some of the lots, a per-lot assess- <br />ment nay be more equitable than the usual per-foot assessment for this area, <br />although petitions were signed at the per-foot basis for both this project and <br />the one immediately preceding. <br />basis is $346.110 for the Blacktopping; $334.00 for Curb and Gutter. <br />Hyde recommended a ten-year assessment for this and the preceding project. <br />Kohler’s motion approving project and putting Council on record as favoring <br />ten-year assessment for both Curb and Gutter and Blacktopping, as well as <br />per-lot method of assessment, was seconded by Tupa and carried. (See Reso- <br />lution of later in meeting, Ordering Improvements). Because ‘chis is not <br />an assessment hearing, Council cannot act, formally, to establish assessment <br />term or method. <br />Manager Hyde <br />He told audience that Estimate on a per-lot <br />Fdlanager <br />Note: <br />6* PROPOSED BLACKTOPPING IN BERNARD PLACE FROM W.56TH STREET TO W.57TH STREET. <br />Vu-Graph Slide was shown of plan and property proposed to be assessed, and Estimate <br />of Cost was read at a Total of $4,206.00, for $3.51 per Assessable Foot. There <br />were no objections at the Hearing, and none had been received prior thereto. <br />Tupa’s motion approving project was seconded by Kohler and carried. (See Reso- <br />lution of later in meeting, Ordering Improvements) . <br />7. <br />Vu-Graph Slide was shown of plan and property proposed to be assessed, and Estimate <br />PROPOSED BLACKTOPPING IN BIRCHCREST DRIVE FROM HkiSEId ROAD TO CODE AVENUE. <br />of Cost was read at a Total of $7,658.40, for $3.09 per Assessable Foot. (See <br />action taken at next hearing) - <br />&e PEOPCISED CURB AIID GUTTER IN BIRCHCREST DRIVE Fl?Ol”d HANSEPI ROAD TO CODE P,VEI.RJE. <br />Vu-Graph Slide was shown of plan and property proposed to be assessed, and Estimate <br />of Cost was read at a Total of $7,622.73, for $3.07 per Assessable Foot. Manager <br />Myde once again recommended a ten-year assessment, for this and the preceding <br />project. <br />asked for a per-lot assessment on this street, and was advised to do.some <br />promotional work among his neighbors--the Estimate being $255.23 per lot for <br />Blacktopping; $254.09 for Curb and Gut€er. Kohler’ s motion approving projects <br />and placing Council on record as favoring ten-year term of assessment for <br />Blacktopping-Curb and Gutter was seconded by Tupa and carried. (See Resolution <br />of later in meeting, Ordering Improvements) . <br />The owner at No. 5301 Birchcrest Drive (the largest lot in the block)