Laserfiche WebLink
7/1$$9 <br />3. PUBLXC HEARIKG ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR SANITARY SESdER I!dPROVEMENT NO. 180 <br />- 150 - In Josephine Ave. from l'J.64th St. to include Lot 9, B1. 2, Normandal <br />2nd. Addn. Tabulation of Assessment was read at Total Assessable Cost of This $2,403.52, proposed to be assessed against seven Lots, for $342.86 per Lot. <br />was compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $351.60 per Lot. <br />no objections registered at Hearing, and no written objections had been received <br />prior thereto. <br />(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessments) . <br />There were <br />Eeim's motion approving Assessment was seconded by Tupa and carried. <br />i <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR SANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENT <br />NO. 154 - In Nest Shore Dr. from Dunham Dr. to Gilford Dr.; Wooddale Ave. <br />from Ellsworth Dr. to Gilford Dr.; Gilford Dr. from West Shore Dr. to <br />Keflogg Ave. Tabulation of Assessment was reat at $28.800.00 Total Assess- <br />able Cost, proposed to be assessed against 64 Lots, for $449.50 per Lot, as compared <br />with $574.28 per Lot given as Estimate of Cost at Improvement Hearing. <br />no objections registered at the Hearing, and no written objections had been received <br />prior thereto- <br />carried- (See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessments) . <br />There were I Tupa's motion approving Assessment was seconded by Dickson and <br />5. PUB IC HEARIKG ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR WATERMAIN IMPROVELIEPJT NO. 132- <br />In Oxford Ave. from Ii'terlachen Blvd. to 330 Ft. S. of W.51st St. Tabu- <br />lation of Assessment was read as $11,326.80 Total Assessable Cost, proposed to be <br />assessed against 24 Lots, for an assessable cost of $471.45 per Lot, as compared <br />with the Improvement Hearing Estimate of $514.50. . <br />registered at the Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior <br />thereto. <br />(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessments) . <br />There were no objections <br />Dickson's motion approving Assessment was seconded by Tupa and carried. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR WATERTiIAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 134- <br />In Vest Shore Dr. from Dunham Dr. to Gilford Dr.; Wooddale Ave. from Ells- <br />worth Dr. to Gilford Dr.; Gilford Dr. from West Shore Dro to Oaklawn Ave.; <br />Oaklavrn Ave. from Ellsworth Dr. to Gilford Dr. Tabulation of Assessment <br />was read at Total Assessable Cost of $41,252.79, proposed to be assessed over 87 <br />Lots, for $473.67 per Lot, as compared with $523.32 Estimate given at Improvement <br />Hearing. <br />had been filed prior to the Hearing. <br />seconded by Kohler and carried. <br />and Confirming Assessments) . <br />No objections were received from the floor, and no written objections <br />Dickson's motion approving Assessment was <br />(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting <br />70 PUBLIC HEARIKG ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT KO. 42- <br />Comm. at pt. 33 Ft., more or less w. and 10 Ft. more or less, S. of <br />intersection of centerline of vi.60th St. and Wooddale Ave.; th. Ely long <br />line parallel to and 10 Ft. S. of centerline of l"l.6Oth st. to pt. 35 Ft., <br />more or less, E. of centerline of Oaklawn Ave.; th. NEly to pt. 160 Ft., <br />more or less, E. of centerline of 1'1.59th St.; th. NEly to a pt. 10 Ft. <br />S. and 10 Ft. E., more or less, of intersection of centerline of lr1.59th <br />St. and Brookview Ave.; th. Nly on a line parallel to and 13 Ft. more <br />or less, VJ. of the centerline of Brookview Ave. to a pt. 128 Ft., more <br />or less, S. of centerline of W.58th St.; th- Ely, parallel to centerline <br />of V1.58th St., 150 Ft., more or less, to Outlet; and including Construction <br />of concrete Curb and Gutter in VJ.60th St. be$ween Kellogg and Oaklawn Aves. <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read as follows: Total Construction Cost, $25,047.34, <br />Less Village Share of 1/3 of Cost, $8,347.01, for Net Assessable cost of $16,700.33, <br />proposed to be assessed against 1,181,906 Assessable sq. Ft., for $.01413 per Sq. <br />Ft. This was compared with Estimated Cost of $.02303. Mr. Johnson, 5817 Brookview <br />Ave., grantor of an easement for construction of main, inquired as to whether he . <br />will be assessed for the easement. He was informed that, normally, such an assess- <br />ment would be made inasmuch as the title to the property still rests in him. No <br />objections were registered at the Hearing, and no mitten objections had been <br />received prior thereto. Dickson's motion approving Assessment was seconded by <br />Eeim and carried. <br />Assessments). <br />I <br />(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting and Confirming <br />8s FUBLIC HEAR1P;G 014 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STORM SEER IMPROVBJD!T NO. 43- <br />In Easement Line between Lots 3 and 4, B1. 1, Southdale 1st Addn., from <br />Cornelia Dr. to 165 Ft. VJ. Tabulation of Assessment was read at Total <br />Assessable Cost of $1,706.63, proposed to be assessed against 39,900 Sq. Ft., for <br />$.04266 per Assessable Sq. Ft., as compared with Estimated Cost of $.075. <br />were no objections registered at the Hearing, and none had been received prior <br />thereto. <br />and attempt to have Storm Sewer Improvements Nos. 43 and 44 combined, but that an <br />agreement could not be reached. He also informed Council that these two small <br />improvements are to correct local drainage problemsy as distinguished from the <br />large storm sewer project contemplated. <br />seconded by Kohler and carried. (See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting <br />and Confirming Assessments) . <br />There <br />Manager Hyde told Council that neighborhood meetings have been held in <br />Tupa's motion approving Assessment was <br />9, PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STOIVA SEVJER IMPROVBENT ItO- 44- <br />In Easement Line between Lots 6 and 7, B1. 1, Southdale 1st Addn., from <br />Cornelia Dr. to 170 ~t. W. Tabulation of Assessment was read at Total <br />Assessable Cost of $1,838.97, proposed to be assessed over 74,805 sq. Ft., for <br />$.02449 per sq. Ft., as compared with Estimated Cost of $.038. <br />set forth for Storm Sewer No. 43. <br />Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior thereto. <br />approving ~ssessment was seconded by Dickson and carried. <br />in JJteeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessments). <br />See explanation <br />There were no objections registered at the <br />Beim's motion <br />(See Resolution of later