4/ 11/ 6 0
<br />MINUTES OF THE R&XLAR MEETING OF THE: EDXNA
<br />VILLAGE COUNCIL, HFAD IiIBNDAY, APSXLT, 11, 1960
<br />AT 7:OO P.M., AT THE: EPTNA WlllL4GE ML
<br />Nenibers answering Rollcall were Beim, Kohler and Tupa.
<br />Nayor in the absence of Bayor Bredesen and Mayor Pro Tem Dickson.
<br />NINUTES of the Regular Neeting of Monday, March 28, and of the April 4th Adjourned
<br />Portion of the Bfarch 28th Fleeting, were approved as submitted, by motion Beirn,
<br />seconded by Kohler and carried.
<br />Trustee Tupa acted as
<br />PUBLIC HEARING'ON PROPOSED VACATION OF '#THAT PART OF LARKSPUR LANE LYING WEST OF
<br />TRE EAST 60 FEET THEREOF AND IPSMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO LOT 11, BLOCK 3; LAKE EDINA
<br />March 17 and 24, and of Posting, Narch 18, of "Notice of Hearing"; and, pursuant
<br />to said notice, Mayor Tupa called Public Hearing on the above named proposed
<br />street vacation. Planning Director*Hite explained that this action has been
<br />recommended by the Planning Commission, in tieing the two Lake Edina Additions;
<br />that the Gas Company does need an easement in the street, and that if Council
<br />does vacate, proceedings should not be put on record until such easement is
<br />received prior thereto, and Kohler offered the following Resolution and moved
<br />its adoption:
<br />Clerk presented Affidavits of Publication in Edina-Norningside Courier
<br />There were no objections registered at the Hearing, and none had been
<br />RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF LARKSPUR LANE
<br />-WHEREAS, two PJeekS' published notice and'posted notice of a hearing to be had
<br />on April 11, 1960, at 7 :00 P.M., on the proposed Vacation of the following portion
<br />of Larkspur Lane:
<br />-"That part of Larkspur Lane lying West of the East Sixty (60) feet thereof
<br />and immediately adjacent to Lot 11, Block 3, Lake Edina Addition, mre
<br />particularly ,described as follows : * I
<br />'Commencing at the Southeast-corner of Lot 10, Block 3, Sake Edina
<br />Addition; thence South along the extension South of the East line of
<br />said Lot 10, a distance of Five (5)'feet to the actual pointof
<br />beginning; thence continuing South along the Southerly extension of
<br />the East line of said Lot 10, a distance of One Hundred Five (105) 1:
<br />feet more or less; thence West at an angle of 87 degrees and 46
<br />minutes to the last described line, a distance of Fifty-four (54)
<br />feet more or less to a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 11,
<br />Block 3, Lake Edina Addition, said point being Fifty-five qnd
<br />ninety-one hundredths (55.91) feet East of the Southwest corner of
<br />said Lol 11; thence Northerly and Easterly along *the Easterly line
<br />of said lot 11 to the actual point of beginning'
<br />has been given and made, and a hearing has been had thereon by the Village Council:
<br />NOV, THEREFORE, B& IT RESOLVE0 by the Village Council of the Village of Edina,
<br />Hennepin County, Minnesota, that
<br />That that portion of Larkspur Lane hereinbefore described be and hereby is
<br />Notion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Beim, and on Rollcall there were
<br />three ayes and no nays, as follovs:
<br />Resolution was adopted.
<br />Beim, aye; Kohler, aye; and Tupa, aye; and the
<br />(%illage Clerk *.
<br />(Kohler then moved that Clerk be instructed to delay transmittal of resolution for
<br />record until such time as the requested easement has been secured by the Ninneapolis
<br />Gas Company. Notion seconded by Beim and carried.
<br />PUBLIC REARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF "THAT PART OF SHERWOOD AVENUE LYING LEIMEDIATELY
<br />NORTH OF 17.69TH STREET, AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE IN THFt PLAT OF 'BROST ADDITION'" .
<br />Clerk presented Affidavits of Publication in Edina-Norningside Cburier March 17 and 24,
<br />1960, and of Posting, llarch 18, of "Notice of Hearing", which were approved as to form
<br />and ordered placed on file.
<br />the proposed Vacation of that part of Shemood Avenue described in this title, and the
<br />following action taken.
<br />been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission; that the opmers of property
<br />facing Normandale Road have set their houses so far back from the Highway that it is
<br />impossible for them to divide their deep lots into two building lots and they, there-
<br />fore are unwilling" to dedicate 30 feet for a 6O-foot right-of-way; and'that the
<br />Brittany Road property owners prefer deep lots.
<br />of whom gave his name, stated they would much prefer not to have the road come north.
<br />Their were no objections to the proposed Vacation at the Hearing, and none had been
<br />filed prior thereto. Beim offered the following Resolution and moved it5 adoption:
<br />Pursuant to said Notice, Public Hearing was conducted on
<br />Planning Director Hite told Council that this Vacation has
<br />Two Normandale Road residents, neither