Laserfiche WebLink
d2. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSNENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-9 <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BITLX.IINOUS SURFACE ON MILDRED AVE., F7.62ND ST. TO VALLEY VIEW RD. <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read as follows: Total Assessable Cost, $5,775.19, <br />proposed to be assessed against 751 Assessable Feet, for $7.69 per Assessable Foot, <br />as compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $7.58. <br />that additional excavation and bituminous surface had been needed on this project, <br />causing the increase over estimate. <br />none h d been received prior thereto. <br />Adopt' g and Confirming Assessmenf). <br />llanager Hyde explained <br />No objections ware raised at Hearing, and <br />(See Resolution of later in Meeting, <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IEiPROVEMENT NO. BA-15 <br />CURB ANI, GUTTER AND BITUIIINOUS SURFACE ON NADDOX LANE, VY" AVE. TO HILDRED AVE. <br />Manager read Total Assessable Cost as $5,458.78, proposed to be assessed against <br />762.4 Assessable Feet, for $7.16 per Assessable Foot as compared with Improvement <br />Hearing Estimate of $7.15. <br />Hearin <. <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUkIINOUS SURFACE ON W.62ND ST. NY" AVENUE TO CODE AVE. <br />Total Assessable Cost was read at $7,536.02, proposed to be assessed against <br />1,355.4 Assessable Feet, for $5.56 per Assessable Foot, as compared with Improvement <br />Hearing Estimate of $6.58. <br />been received prior thereto. (See Resolution of later in Neeting, Adopting and confP PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSENT FOR STREET INPROVENEXT NO, BA-6 <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUBIINOUS SURFACE TREATbBNT, f.W)DOX LANE FROX HANSEN RD. TO <br />IXWN AVE. Manager Hyde read Tabulation of Assessment as follo~7s: Total Assessable <br />Cost, $6,417.05, proposed to be assessed against 981.2 Assessable Feet, for $6.54 <br />per Assessable Foot, as compared with $7.18 Improvement Hearing Estimate. No <br />objections were received, none had been received prior to Hearing. (See Resolution <br />of later in Ileeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessment). <br />I No objections registered, either at or prior to, L.4" PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSENT FOR STREET INPROVEMENT NO. BA-5 <br />(See Resolution of later in lleeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessment). <br />No objections were received at Hearing, and none had <br />'ng Assessment). <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSNENT FOR STREET IBPROVEfilENT NO. BA-26 <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUIIINOUS SURFACE, lJ.57TH ST. FRON CODE AVE. TO BERNARD PLACE. <br />Manager read Total Assessable Cost as $4,021.85, proposed to be assessed against <br />538.4 Assessable Feet, for $7.47 per Assessable Foot as compared with Improvement <br />Hearing Estimate of $7.24. No objections registered. <br />Meeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessment). <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSIGNT FOR STREET IBIPROVEKENT NO. BA-13 <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUMINOUS SURFACE TREATMENT, AYRSHIRE BLVD. FROM DONCASTER <br />WAY TO GLENGARRY PARKWAY. Total Assessable Cost was read as $7,428.38, proposed <br />to be assessed against 1,162.5 Assessable Feet, for $6.39 per Assessable Foot, <br />compared with the formal Improvement Hearing Estimate of $6.39. Mrs. Heilig, <br />explaining that an informal Estimate of $5.30 for this project had been given <br />at Hearing, asked whether this assessment could have been mixed with the York <br />assessment, which is now proposed at $5.30. <br />ae to cost figures, showing that quantkties had gone over estimate in both <br />excavation and stabilized base. Mrs. P.L. Bowers, 5701, complained that she <br />had not received mailed notice, but she was informed that her name is included <br />on village mailing list and has been checked off as having been mailed notice. <br />khere were no other objections registered, and none had been received prior to <br />Hearing. (See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessment). <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-1 <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BLTUkIINOUS SURFACE IN BRITTANY RD., W.66TH ST. TO DUNBERRY LANE <br />AND DUNBERRY LANE FROM BRITTANY ROAD TO ?EST SHORE DRIVE. Tabulation of Assessment <br />was read as follows: <br />against 5,912.4 Assessable Feet, for $4.71 per Assessable Foot as compared with <br />Improvement Hearing Estimate of $6.07. No objections registered. (See Resolution <br />of later in Neeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessment). <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BLTUIINOUS SURFACE IN ZENITH AVE. FROX #6104-05 TO 17.62ND ST. <br />Total Assessable Cost v7as given as $5,617.56, proposed to be assessed against <br />1,080.3 Assessable Feet, for $5.20 per Ass-essable Foot as compared with Improvement <br />Hearing Estimate of $6.94. <br />Resolution of later in Neeting, Adopting and Confirming Assessment). <br />CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUIIINOUS SURFACE, WILFORD WAY FROM BRITTANY RD. TO WEST SHORE <br />DRIVE. <br />2,339 Assessable Feet, for $5.29 per Assessable Foot as compared with Improvement <br />Hearing Estimate of $6.68. <br />prior thereto. <br />Assessment). <br />(See Resolution of later in <br />/7. <br />Nr. Hyde went into some detail <br />J8. <br />Total Assessable Cost, $27,847.40, proposed to be assessed <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING OH PROPOSED ASSESSBENT FOR STREET IESPROVEMENT NO. BA-2 <br />No objections at Hearing; none prior thereto. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STFGET INPROVDENT NO. BA-3 <br />(See <br />40. <br />Total Assessable Cost was read as $12,373.31, proposed to be assessed against <br />No objections registered at Hearing, and none received <br />(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Adopting and Confirming