Laserfiche WebLink
5.0 3 /12 /62 <br />Attorney Richard E, Olson and Mrs, Mabel Wong were present, and both pro- <br />tested adoption of any amendment to Ordinance No, 151#,Nrr Olson on the <br />grounds that "Ordinance No. 15lAis defective from Page 1 through Page 29 <br />and should be completely rewritten, rather than amended piecemealft, and Mrs, <br />Wong on grounds that certain provisions of the ordinance are unreasonable, <br />Mr, Olson pointed out to Council that in his opinion the amendment presented <br />for action this evening will make'it necessary for Wong's Cafe to operate <br />under the same standards as are required for Dayton's. <br />Public Hearing be conducted on Ordinance, <br />for Council consideration at the meeting of March 26, <br />He asked that <br />All proposed Ordinances laid over <br />TREASURER'S REPORT OF ALL FUNDS, showing Cash Balances at January 31, 1962, <br />as well as funds invested, was reviewed and ordered placed on file, <br />CLAIMS PAID. <br />Pre-List dated March 12, 1962, was seconded by VanValkenburg and carried: <br />$441,795 <br />I Bickson's motion for payment of the following Claims, as per <br />General Fund, $16,!204.07; Construction Fund, $6,809.40; Park, Park <br />Construction and Swim Pool, $7,987.92; Waterworks Fund, <br />Liquor Fund, $20,409,69; Sewer Rental Fund, $16.02; Improvement <br />Funds $363 , 00 ; and Poor Fund, $279 , 00-Total, $52,510 e 89 . <br />The meeting's agenda's having been covered, MacMillan <br />Motion seconded by Dickson and carri <br />moved for adjournment, <br />I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING 07 THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, MARCH 26, <br />1962, AT 7:OO PIMI, AT THE EDINA VILLAGE HALL, <br />Members answering Rollcall were MacMillan , Tupa , and VanValkenburg and Bredesen <br />MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of March 12, 1962, WeM approved as submitted, by <br />motion VanValkenburg, seconded by MacMillan and carried, <br />PROPOSED "PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTtt ORDINANCE PRESENTED: HEARING SCHEDULED <br />FOR APRIL 23, <br />Planning Commission, aqd before an audience of some 25 or 30 persons, Planning <br />Director Hite presented to the ' Council the proposed ItPlanned Industrial District" <br />amendment to the Village Zoning Ordinance, <br />amendment will add a classification-that it w'ill in no way change the procedure <br />now presccibed in the zoning ordinance for changing the zoning of any particular <br />property, Referring to the t*Commercialtt classification contained in the present <br />zoning ordinance, Nre Hite told Council that the Planning Commission would hope <br />that any new petitions for industrial zoning will be directed toward this <br />proposed new section, rather than the present section, Hr, Todd told Council <br />that because of lack of a quorum at the last- Planning Commission Meeting, the <br />Commission's formal recommendation is not yet available, but he is sure that <br />the Commission will recommend the present draft, with, at most, a few minor <br />changes. <br />to several neighborhood groups, and that additional meetings with such groups <br />will be held during this next month. Mayor Bredesen opened meeting fo questions <br />from the audience, but no questions were received, <br />Hearing on proposed "Planning Industrial District" amendment to Zoning Ordinance <br />be scheduled for April 23. <br />In the presence of Chairman Todd and Member Griswold of the <br />He explained that this proposed <br />Manager Hyde informed Council that this amendment has been explained <br />MacMillan moved that Public <br />Motion seconded by Tupa and carried. <br />C~GNCI~; KEZONES LOT 2, BLOCK 1, CLIFTON TERRACE (NW COR, VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND <br />CROSSTOW? HIGHWAY 1 TO WJLTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT" , Clerk presented Affidavit <br />of Publication in Edina-Morningside Courier of "Notice of Hearing" , and Planning <br />Director presented Affidavit of Mailing of said Notice, relevant to the Petition <br />of Mr, Bob Oslund for Rezoning the above entitled property from "Open Development <br />District" to "Multiple Residence Districts", <br />form and ordered placed on file, Pursuant to Notice, Mayor called Public Hearing <br />on Petition, <br />for rezoning, together with surrounding area. <br />double bungalows in this area, except for one lot directly across Valley View <br />Road, which has been approved for a four-plex. <br />rezoning, it is proposed to build a three-unit apartment, the three units to <br />be side by side, facing south; that units meet or exceed a11 requirements for <br />design; that lot is adequate for three units; that Planning Commission recommends <br />approval, providing building is built in middle of lot. No objections to the <br />proposal were registered at the Hearing, and none had been received prior thereto. <br />Mre-HoJe Bach, 5232 Duncraig Road, owner of the lot immediately to the west of <br />this property, signified his assent. <br />Affidavits were approved as to <br />Planning Director Hite presented a sketch, showing site proposed <br />It was shown that there are <br />On the property proposed for <br />VanValkenburg offered the following