Laserfiche WebLink
3/16/64 <br />Section 2. Paragraph 1, Boundaries of Office Building District, of <br />Section 10 (Office Building District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances ) 5 of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding after <br />sub-paragraph (9) of said Paragraph 1, the following: <br />"(h) Tracts C, D, E, F and G, all in accordance with the Preliminary <br />Plan entitled "Preliminary Plan for Bertelson and Rauenhorstfl <br />and dated January, 1964, on file in office of Edina Village Clerk." <br />Section 3. Parsgraph 2, Boundaries of Planned Industrial District, of <br />Section 11, (Planned Industrial District) of Ordinance No, 261 of revised <br />ordinances of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by <br />adding after sub-paragraph (f) of said Paragraph 2, the following subparagraph: , "(9) Tracts, H. I. J, K, L, $1, N, P, Q, R, S, T and U, all .in accordance <br />with the Preliminary Plan entitled "Preliminary Plan for Bertelson and <br />Rauenhorst" and dated January, 1964, on file in office of Edina Village <br />Clerk. l1 <br />Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and <br />after its passage and publication according to law. <br />Motion for waiver of second reading and for adoption of Ordinance as submitted <br />was seconded by MacMillan, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as <br />and the Resolution was adopted, <br />PERMISSION GRANTED SFOR EDINA-MORNINGSIDE HIGH SCHOOL BANNER OVER Wm50TH STREET. <br />One of the members of the High School Student Council appeared before the Council <br />to request permission for installation of a banner over M.50th Street in the. <br />France-50th St. business district. <br />Council, with promise of help in installation by Fire Department if needed. <br />for STATE HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT MARCH 19, 20 AND 21. <br />Permission enthusiastically granted by <br />Banner <br />PROPOSED -REZONING OF PART OF NELSON FARM MEETS WITH OPPOSITION; HEARING CONTINUED <br />FOR TWO WEEKS FOR FIELD INSPECTION BY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION. Clerk <br />presented Affidavits of Publication, Posting and Mailing of "Notice of Public ' <br />Hearing on Petition for Rezoning-Portion of Nelson Farm", which affidavits were <br />approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due. notice given, <br />Public Hearing was called on the petition of Metro-U.S. Construction Company <br />for the rezoning of certain portions of the Nelson Farm (lying West of Highway <br />100 and South of W.74th Street) to R-4 MULTIPLE .RESIDENCE DISTRICT, OFFICE BUILDING <br />DISTRICT, AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, the tracts petitioned for rezoning <br />being described in detail in the <br />published notice being in Edina-Morningside Courier March 5 and 12, 1964. <br />overlays, Planning Director Hite explained to Council and audience the present <br />zoning on Nelson Farm, the present zoning of the surrounding area, and the <br />proposed zoning on Nelson Farm as compared with present zoning. <br />also showed road plan. <br />were reviewed. <br />be expected to happen to the property to the North, if this proposed rezoning is <br />approved; that it is only fair to say that the same kind of zoning (being Office <br />Building, Multiple Residence, and Planned Industrial) could be expected as far <br />North as Nine-Mile Creek. <br />happen, but is a reasonable extension of this present proposal, <br />directly adjacent to Nelson Farm on the North, complained that the road'plan as <br />now shown shows no 'lW.74th Street"; that what the developers of the Nelson Farm <br />are doing is to so plat their streets as to give completely inadequate.access to <br />his clients property, thus causing "diminution of property". is ' <br />proposed Zoning of the property and not the road pattern. He added as a matter of <br />information that the "Ring 40 acres" about which Mr. Sachs has been speaking has <br />not had access to Highway LOO prior to this time, and that it has been the general <br />policy of the Village that where joint land owners cannot get together on joint <br />access, the plat with some access is accepted. <br />the Ring interests are not interested in paying at this time for development of <br />joint access from Highway #loo. <br />share of whatever "W.74th Street" costs; that he will be glad to put this into <br />writing. <br />south is not expected to be the only access to the property--but that any other <br />access to Highway 100 must come through a parcel between Ring's 40 acres and the <br />published and posted Notice of Hearing-- <br />With the help of a number of visual aids-half sections, vu-graph'slides and <br />Visual aids <br />Planning Commission Recommendations favorable to the petitioned reqoning <br />Mr. Hite reported that some preliminary studies have been madeas to what might <br />He added this is not a definition of what would actually <br />Mr. Louds Sachs, an attorney representing owners of the central property <br />Village Manager Hyde reminded Mr. Sachs that this Public Hearing/on the <br />Mr. Hyde stated he understands <br />Mr. Sachs replied his clients will pay their <br />Mr, Hite reported the proposed access to the Ring property from the