Laserfiche WebLink
43/6/64 <br />Mr. Bredesen added he believes these <br />Trustee VanValkenburg asked if there <br />are of the best. <br />people are honest and their <br />is anything the Village can <br />orderly development, and Attorney Whitlock answered that an agreement <br />intentions 7 3 c do to assure <br />could be <br />entered into between the Viblage and the developers, Mr. Hite reported that the <br />proposal made by Dietrich-Francis--which is quite comprehensive--sets forth much <br />that has been discussed and could be used as the basis for such an agreement. <br />public water, <br />company will take water from Edina if EdSna will bring it to the area. <br />Insofar as the'possible downgrading of the development is concerned, Mr. <br />Dietrich reported that the best defense against fhis is that' downgrading would <br />hurt the developers more than anyone else, <br />be done as one complete package, and that they couldn't downgrade the development <br />even if they wanted to. <br />Mr. Hite suggested that one way of securing orderly development would be to <br />rezone the first area, in the Northeast corner of the tract R-3, and then rezone <br />the other areas from time to time as development becomes imminent. Mr. Dietrich <br />objected to this solution, saying this would subject developers to the whims of <br />future governing bodies. <br />imperative .that developers know what they can do with entire t-ract, <br />dispense with second reading thereof and adopt Ordinance as submitted, 7- but that <br />publication of Ordinance be delayed pending execution -7 of an agreement between <br />developers - axvillage stzing that developers will build no more than 220 units <br />on this tract (BLocks 20,and 21, Emma Abbott Park), and that building will be <br />essentially according to plan submitted to and approved by Edina Planning Commission: <br />. <br />Mr. VanValkenburg inquired of Mr, Dietrich as to how he expects to secure <br />He answered that the simplest way is from St.Louis Park, but that <br />He added that their mortgaging will <br />I <br />Mr, Leonard Parker, Architect, said he feels it is <br />VanValkenburg then submitted the following Ordinance, moving that Council <br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-82 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 <br />(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA <br />ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT <br />THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: <br />Paragraph 1, Multiple Residence District Boundaries, of <br />Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances <br />of the Village of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following sub-paragraph: <br />Section 1. <br />District R- 4 : <br />"(5) St.Pau1 and Suburban Railroad Right-of-Way," <br />after its passage and publication according to law. <br />VanValkenburg's motion for waiver of second reading, adoption of Ordinance as <br />submit.ted, and delay of publication thereof pending agreement, was seconded by <br />Tupa, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: <br />Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye;.VanValkenburg, aye; and Br <br />Blocks 20 and 21, Emma Abbott Park,.!and part of Vacated Minneapolis, <br />Section 2, This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and <br />MacMillan, aye; , aye; and the Ordinance was <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PETITION OF MR. H.M. SCHOENLNG. 5700 SO. BLAKE RD. FOR REZONING <br />TO. R-2 PIULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT, CONTINUED TO -APRIL 20. Mayor Bredesen told <br />Council and audience that he had received word 1 that several of- the immediate <br />neighbors had received no notice from the Village office of the Public Hearing to be <br />held this evening on the petition of Mr, H.M. Schoening, 5700 So, Blake Rd. for the <br />Rezoning of the 11So,152 Ft. of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 345" to R-2 <br />Multiple Residence District. <br />in order that proper notice might be sent. <br />present for this evening's Hearing, and VanValkenburg so moved. <br />Tupa and unanimously carried, <br />He suggested that Hearing be continued to April 20, <br />There was no objection from the people <br />Motion seconded by <br />"THAT PART OF E1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SEC.8,TWP.l16,R,21 LYING SO. OF STATE HWY.#5" <br />REZONED FROM llCOMMERCIAL1l DISTRICT TO "PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT" . <br />was called on the proposed for rezoning the above described tract from Commercial <br />Public Hearing <br />District to Planned Industrial District, pursuant to Notice of Public Hearing published <br />in Edina-Morningside Courier March 19 and 26, 1964, posted on Village Bulletin Boards <br />on March 13, and mailed to owners of affected properties. 'Reviewing this for the <br />Council, Mr, Hite reported that this property was rezoned from Open Development to <br />Commercial District in 1960 because Commercial District was the only zoning we had <br />at that time applicable to the type of land use desired by Western Meats; that the <br />Village now has adopted the Planned Industrial District zoning, and it is felt that <br />this is a better land use for this area; that this zoning change is being proposed <br />by Village. He added that some outside storage is the only thing which the land is <br />now being used for which is not permitted under the new regulation. Asked if this <br />will affect the land south of No, 5 and North of Bloomington, Mr. Hite replied that