<br />accept fee in lieu of park land. Mrs. Fred W. Cary, 6824 Gleason Road,
<br />questioned Mr. Frank Cardarelle who represented the developer as to how the
<br />plat would affect her property. She expressed satisfaction with his reply.
<br />No further comments were heard, whereupon Councilman Courtney offered the
<br />following resolution and moved its adoption:
<br />RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIllINARY PLAT OF
<br />BRAEMAR HILLS 6TH ADDITION
<br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that
<br />that certain plat entitled "Braemar Hills 6th Addition",,platted by R. H.T.
<br />Investment Company, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the meeting of
<br />the Village Council on February 7, 1972, be and is hereby granted preliminary
<br />plat approval; and
<br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Village accept fee in lieu of park land.
<br />Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw and on
<br />rollcall there were three ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted.
<br />RENNEY ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTINUED TO MARCH 6 , 1972 Affidavits of
<br />Notice were presented by Clerk, approved.as to form and ordered placed on file.
<br />Mr. Luce presented Kenney Addition for preliminary plat approval as recommended
<br />by the Planning Commission, noting that this eight lot plat is located South
<br />of 11. 66th Street and Nest of T.H. 100.
<br />in the'plat to provice access to adjacent undeveloped property.
<br />Davis, attorney representing property owners in the area, presented a petition
<br />in opposition to the plat and noted that a number of neighbors were present to
<br />protest the plat as presented. Objections were on the grounds of concern over
<br />the preservation of the pond and wodds, and because neighbors wanted a more
<br />comprehensive plan developed for the entire area at the same time.. llr. Davis
<br />requested that the matter be postponed for one month to permit neighbors to
<br />meet with the Planner and developers to work out an over-all plan. Mention
<br />was made of action taken in 1965 to remove a deed restriction limiting one
<br />house to a lot. It was brought out that action on this matter is still pend-
<br />ing. Mr. Erickson said that the Village is not bound by private^ restrictions.
<br />Mr. Hyde recalled that several attempts have been made in the past to bring a
<br />sewer line into the area but that neighbors could not reach agreement in the
<br />could not,be fdrced to plat their land at any particular time, but that neces-
<br />sary provisions would have to be made so that the property would not be land
<br />locked. Councilman Shaw's motion was then seconded by Councilman Courtney and
<br />carried that the hearing be continued-to March 6, 1972, so that neighbors could
<br />meet with the Planner and with the dev-eloper, and further that discussion should
<br />be limited to the Kenney Addition.
<br />He explained that a road is included
<br />Mr. Harry C.
<br />It was noted also that owners of the adjacent undeveloped property
<br />LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 1, CAROLANE ADDITION, PRELIlIINARY PLAT APPROVAL
<br />CONTINUED TO MARCH 6, 1972. ,Affidavits.of Notice were presented by Clerk,
<br />approved as to form and ordered placed on file. llr. Luce presented the pro-
<br />posal of the developer to increase to six, rather than five, the number of
<br />lots on Lee Valley Circle.
<br />smaller than lots to the South, but generally
<br />the area and that the platting would not affect the existing houses.
<br />Vernon A, Knutson, 7017 Lee Valley Circle, said that the four neighbors he
<br />had talked to had told llr. Oertel that they would not be in favor of the pro-
<br />five lots. Nr. Oertel said that he thought he could reach agreement with the
<br />neighbors. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson said that Council could take no action unless
<br />neighbors agreed to removal of the deed restriction.
<br />motion was then seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried that the matter be
<br />continued to March 6, 1972, to see of the developer and neighbors could reach
<br />NORMANDAI3 LUTHERANCH CHURCH ADDITION GRANTED PRELIEIINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL.
<br />Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered
<br />placed on file., Mr. Luce advised Council that this property is being platted
<br />merely to consolidate the legal description of Normandale Lutheran Church,
<br />whereupon Councilman Shaw offered the following resolution and moved its adopt-
<br />Mr. Luce advised that the size of the lots is
<br />consistent with other lots in
<br />He advised that there is a deed restriction limiting the property to
<br />Councilman Courtney's
<br />RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL AND PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
<br />NOFWANDU LUTHERAN I CHURCH ADDITION
<br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota,
<br />that that certain plat entitled "Normandale Lutheran Church Additiolif platted
<br />by Normandale Evangelical Lutheran Church of Edina, a Ninnesota Religious
<br />Corporation, owners and proprietors, and First Federal Savings and Loan
<br />Association of >Enneapolis, a United States of America Corporation, >Iortgagees,
<br />and presented at the meeting of the Edina Vil3gge Council.of February 7, 1972,