Laserfiche WebLink
that sidewalks constructed two years ago on the South side of the street are <br />used mostly by bicycHsts and that pedestrians usually walk-in the street. ,Mr. <br />Frank Paganct, 4212 I?. 70th Street, circulator of the petition requesting the <br />izprovement, was told by Nr. Dunn that the Engineers wiil do their best to, <br />work with property owners in determinbg which trees must be removed. No _l* <br />further objections were heard. <br />Minutes .) <br />) . <br />(See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in <br />G.' CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE SIDEI?ALK I$PRi)VFiNT NO. P-S-12 IN THE FOLLOWING: <br />Both sides of York Avenue from I?. 69th Street to 14. 74th Street <br />Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $66,107.75, advising <br />that there is proposed to be no assessment against abutting properties inas- <br />much as it is proposed to pay the entire cost of this improvement from Mmici- <br />pal State Aid funds. <br />hereto. <br />8. CONSTRUCTION OF PEREiANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CW AND GUTTER I No objections were heard and none had been-received prior <br />(See Resol.ution Ordering Improvement later in Yfnutes.) <br />IMPROVEMENT NO. P-BA-206 IN THE FOLLOTJING: <br />All Streets in Parkvood Knolls 19th Addition <br />Advising that this improvement has been petitioned by the developer, Parkwood <br />Knolls Construction Comyany, Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction <br />cost at $54,616.15 proposed to be assessed against 36 assessable lots at an <br />estimated cost of $1,517.12 per assessable lot. <br />Yxs. Helen IicClellan, lfr. Dunn explained that the improvement will be accomp- <br />lished in 1976 with the exception of a finishing seal coat which will be applied <br />in June, 1977. No Gther comments were heard and none had been received prior <br />hereto. <br />I. PERMANENT STREET SUFSACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. 2 <br />Lanham Lane from South line of M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition <br />Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $25,807.71, proposed <br />In response to a question of <br />(See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) <br />P-BA-208 IhT THE FOLLOWING: <br />' to Fleetwood Drive <br />to be assessed at $1,407.95 per assessable lot as a Plan C improvement. <br />objections were heard and none had been received prior hereto. <br />Ordering Improvement later in.finutes.) <br />Lanhzm Lane from South line of M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to <br />Fleetwood Drive - <br />No <br />(See Resolution <br />J. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN QPROVEMENT NO. P-WM-295 IN THE FOLLOWING: <br />I Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $13,044.36, proposed to <br />be assessed at $724.67 per lot as a Plan B improvement in accordance with the <br />terns and conditions ~f a Developers Agreement entered into Setween the developer <br />and the City of Edina. No objections were heard and none had been received prior <br />thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) <br />K. CONSTIIUCTIOX OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVENENT NO. P-SS-324 IN THE FOLLOWING: <br />Lanhvn Lane from South line of M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to - Fleetwood Drive <br />Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at. $14,042.44, proposed to <br />be assessed at $780.14 per assessable lot as a Plan B improvement in accordance <br />with the terns and conditions of a Developers Agreement entered into between the <br />d&eloper and the City. <br />prior thereto. <br />No objections were heard and none had been received <br />(See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) <br />L. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEIJER IMPROVEMXNT NO. F-ST.S-144 IN THE FOLT,OTJING: <br />Lanhau Lane from South line of M.P. Johnson's Prospect Bills 3rd Addition to <br />9 Fleetxood Drive <br />Nr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $4,552.91, proposed to <br />be assessed at $252.94 as a Plan B improvenent in accordance with the terms and <br />conditions of a Developers Agreement entered into between the developer and the <br />City. 'No objections were heard and zone had been received prior thereto. <br />maa.Corrrtney thereqoa-offered the followiq resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Council- <br />RESOLUTION OXDERING IEPROVEMENTS NOS. <br />STORM SEWER DPROVEMENT ST. S-144 <br />WATERMAIN Ii4PROVEMENT WM-295 <br />'. SANITARY SEWER IMFROVEMENT S5-324 <br />STREET-IMPROVEMENTS BA-206, BA-207 AN9 BA-208 <br />STREET LIGHTING IIPROVEMENT L-11 <br />SIDEWALK IMPRflVEIBNTS S-11, S-12 AND 5-13 <br />BE %T RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council <br />heretofore caused*notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of <br />eachparcel within the area-proposed to be assessed on the following proposed <br />1. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AN?) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN <br />. <br />.) iaprovements : <br />THE FOLLOWING: <br />Grove Street froin Johnson Drive to Tracy Avenue <br />W. 56th Street and Oaklawn Avenue .. <br />2- CONSTRUCTION OF OIC?AHENTATA STREET LIGHT AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: <br />.c