<br />8 2
<br />"The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub-District PRD-3x is. .
<br />enlarged by the addition of the following property:
<br />Lots 3, 4, 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights (which is in Sub-District PRD-3)" .
<br />Sec. 2.
<br />and publication.
<br />Membei'Richards then moved that the concerns regarding traffic flow, both into
<br />Committee for their recommendations.
<br />This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
<br />. .r and from.,the,site, on Interlachen Boulevard be referred to the Traffic Safety
<br />Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen.
<br />... Ayes:. Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney I Motion carried.
<br />HEDBERG AND SONS CO$PANY REQUEST FOR REZONING TO POD-1 AND PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTINUED
<br />TO JANUARY 9, 1984.
<br />and for preliminary plat approval of Hedberg and Sons Company had been continued
<br />from the Council Meeting of December 5, 1983, and thai the proponents have again
<br />requested a continuation to January 9, 1984.
<br />by Member Turner to continue the Hedberg and Sons Company rezoning request and pre-
<br />liminary plat review to January 9, 1984.
<br />Mr. Hughes recalled that the request for rezoning to POD-1
<br />Member Schmidt's motion was seconded
<br />Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
<br />Motion carried.
<br />AMENDMENT TO CO&PRJ3HENSIVE PLAN FOR 1980-90 CONTINUED TO JANUARY 9, 1984.
<br />recommendation by staff, Member Richards moved that the hearing on the Amendment to
<br />the Comprehensive Plan for 1980-90 be continued to January 9, 1984.
<br />seconded by Member Turner.
<br />Motion was
<br />Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney J Motion carried.
<br />'PRELININARY PLAT APPROVED FOR SVANOE REPLAT, LOT 3, BLOCK 3, CAROLANE ADDITION
<br />Affidavit of Notice was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed
<br />on file. Mr. Hughes recalled that preliminary plat approval of the Svanoe Replat,
<br />generally located at 7013 Lee Valley Circle, had been considered by the Council on
<br />October 17 and November 7, 1983, for a subdivision of an existing single family lot
<br />that is improved with a dwelling on the easterly portion. At the latter meeting,
<br />it was referred back to the Community Development and Plannihg Commission because of
<br />concerns raised by surrounding property owners that,'due to the shape of the new-
<br />lot, a-dwelling could be. constructed to the rear of the property .which would
<br />overlook the rear yards of the adjacent properties.
<br />tion be placed on the lot that would regulate the precise location of a new house on
<br />the property. The Planning Commission subsequently reviewed a proposal by the pro-
<br />ponent to restrict the lot whereby a house could not be constructed beyond a.line --c
<br />drawn parallel with and 124 feet southwesterly of the front lot line in response to
<br />concerns of the neighbors. The Commission at its November 30, 1983, meeting recom-
<br />mended approval of the subdivision, subject to the proposed restriction and sub-
<br />division dedication. Mr. Hughes indicated that Don Patten, representing the propon-
<br />ents, was present to answer questions. Mr. Patten then presented graphics of a
<br />proposed house to be built on the new lot that he felt would fit nicely within the-
<br />proposed restriction and that would fall within the setbacks required by ordinance.
<br />He stated that the neighbors had been shown the plan at a meeting on November 21, . .
<br />and requested approval of the subdivision as now proposed. William Smith, 7017 Lee
<br />Valley Circle, referred to his letter of October 28, 1983 in which proposed setbacks
<br />were stated and commented that he felt the setbacks &n the plan now proposed are
<br />inconsistent with what was expected. Mr. Smith asked that the Council reconsider
<br />where the restriction line should be and reiterated his concern that the proposed
<br />subdivision will result in the loss of privacy he now enjoys and that it will be
<br />inconsistent with the current siting of homes in the neighborhood.
<br />cussion on sideyard and rear yard setbacks, Member Turner offered the following
<br />resolution and moved its adoption:
<br />:I ,
<br />It was suggested that a restric-
<br />. -
<br />Following dis-
<br />-I RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
<br />APPROVAL OF SVANOE REPLAT
<br />BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain
<br />plat entitled "Svanoe Replat", pxatted by William R. and Myrtle A. Svanoe, husband
<br />and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 19,
<br />1983, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval, subject to the condition
<br />that the owner execute and deliver to the City a declaration of restrictive covenants,
<br />in recordable form and otherwise in form and substance acceptable to the City, pro-
<br />hibiting construction of any house, porch or deck, on that part of the Westerly lot
<br />of Carolane Addition lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 124 feet
<br />Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of the lot.
<br />Xotion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
<br />Rollcall :
<br />Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
<br />Abstained: Schmidt
<br />Resolution adopted.