Laserfiche WebLink
Zembers answering Rollcall Ysre Bank, Dickson, Kohlsr, and Bredesea. <br />FUBLIC HEiAIKGS (SI! PLOFOSED d'~SS:SS:.:EI,TS: <br />of tv:o Hotices of Aseessrmen-t Harings, published in Etiina-tiorningside Courier on <br />July 31 and st 7, 1958, both of vhich affidavits v;ere approved as to 2orm and <br />ordered placed on file. Fursuant to said ilotices, the following Public Heerlngs <br />were conducted, and action taken: <br />I. STREET I!DEOVE.iEiT KO. 144 -' BLACKTOPPIKG of Beard ;\venue from y;.6Oth St. <br />to ::',62nd St. Tabulation of .',ssessment shor:led Total iissessable Cost to be $3,911.16, <br />as against 2,370.4 Assessable Feet, for 51.65 per Assessable Foot, as ccmpared with <br />Improvement Hearing Estimate of S2.27. <br />Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior thereto. <br />of later in meeting, approving assessment). <br />20 <br />HAXSElJ RD. TO RAILT;O,'.D TR'-CKS: E-47 - CUP3 AIID GUTTER Ii? '.'lII.!DSOX AVE. FROI.; I-IilIISEiiI <br />ROAD TO E. LIKE OF LOT 8, BLCCI; 6 AI!D LOT 9, BLOCK 7 IIJ YESTCHESTER K;:OLLS :DD:J. <br />Tabulation of Assessment Eor A-95 showed Total Assessable Cost to ba $5,008.33 <br />as against 1,531.6 Assessable Feet, for $3.27 per iissessable Foot as compared <br />with Improvement Hearing Estinate of $3.17. For E-47, Tabulation of Assessment <br />showed Total Assessable cost to be $1,572.91; Lots 8, Block 6 and 9, Block 7 to <br />be assessed $1.62 per Assessable Foot, and the balance of the properties at s.75 <br />per Assessable Foot, compared uith Improvement Hearing Estimates of $1.53 and <br />S.65 respectively. 1.k. ;,lden Allen, 5300 Ylindsor i.venue, protested paying any <br />assessment for that prcperty vdiich has accrued to him because of street vacation; <br />and ldr. Hytie told Council that Village must have an easement for the Richc.ood <br />Drive Sanitary Sever, through this vacated street. (See Xesolution of later in <br />meeting, approving assessment) . <br />3. STREET IXPROVE.!ElT 110. A-96 - BLi,GI;TOPPII:G - Choven Ave. from ':r.Glst St. to <br />3.62nd St. <br />as against 2,426 Assessable Feet, for $2.42 per Assessable Foot, compared with <br />Improvement Hearing Estimate of $2.88. <br />Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior thereto. (See <br />Resolution of later in meeting, approving assessment) . <br />4. STREET Ii.iPZOVE.lEiX 110. ,447 - BLACKTOPPIEG - 'r'1.6lst St. from Chown Ave. to <br />Ewing Ave. <br />as against 1,147.4 Assessable Feet, for $2.56 per iissessable Foot as compared with <br />Improvement Hearing Estimate of $2.99. There were no objections rzgistered at the <br />Hearing, and no written objections had been received prior thereto. <br />of later in meeting, approving assessment) . <br />5. STREET IIJFGOVELIElT i:O. A-98 - BLACKTOPP1I:G - Cheyenne Circle anti Cheyenne Trail <br />in Indianhead Crest. Tabulation of .iseessment was read at Total iissessable Cost of <br />$4,348.80, bsing assessed on a "Per Lot" basis as per petition, at S484.&Q:, as <br />compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $544.32, i!o objections were registered <br />zt the Hearing, and none had bzen received prior thereto. (See Resolution of later <br />in meeting, approving assessment) . <br />Clerk submitted AiEfidavits of Publication <br />I There were no objections registered at ths <br />(See Resolution <br />STRET IKFilOVIE.EIKS :!OS A-95 id:D B-47 - A-$I5-BLLCICTOPPING OF !'JIiJDSOR AVE, F201.: <br />\ <br />c- - <br />i- -. <br />Tabulation of 1'cssessment showed Total Assessable Cost to be $6,016.12, <br />P!o objections were registered at the <br />Tabulation of Assessment was read at Total Assessable Cost of $2,937-34, <br />(be Zesolution <br />6. STBEST ILIFSOV3~ET LO. .'k-99 - EL;.CI:TOPPIii:G - El l?ancho Trail. Tabulation of <br />Assessment shoned Total Assessable Cost to be $1,E30.20, as aclatnst 693.5 Assessable <br />Feet, for $2.71 per Assessable Foot as conpared kith h&ovem&t Hearing Estimate of <br />$3.17, Iks. CIF. Prescott, 6416 Interlachen Blvd., protested the assessnent because <br />the street abuts her "side yard" and she never uses the street. I:o other objections <br />wre registered, and no !;Titten objections had been received prior to the Iiearing. <br />(See Resolution of later in meeting, approving aSs2ssment) . <br />7. STREET IKF20SEZi3' i;O, 1~100 - BLKKTOPP1I:G - Code he., from ~i.60th St. to <br />Valley view Road. <br />$5,978.65, as against 2,742.5 .*issessable Feet, for $2.18 per Assessable FOG^, as <br />compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $2.72. <br />at the Hearing, and no zritten objections had been received prior thereto. (See <br />Resolution of later in rmeting, approving assessment). <br />8. STREET ILiP2OVEXi!T il0. A-101 - BL>.?CICTOPPII:G - Birchcrest Drive from 'J.fOth St. <br />to Ccde iive, Tabulation of Assessment showed Total Assessable Cost to bs 55,975.02 <br />as against 2,416.l Assessable Feet, for $2.47 per Assessable Foot as coxpared with <br />Improvement Hearing Estimate of 53.00. <br />anti ncne had been received prior thereto. <br />approving assessment). <br />9. STREET 1?.7P20I",'.Ei;T i:O. A-102 - BLXKTOPPII!G - Yi.5Eth St. frcm Uooddale xve. to <br />Concord Ave. <br />as against 2,192.9 Assessable Feet, for $2.56 per Assessable Foot as corpared with <br />Improvement Hearing Estimate of $2.92, <br />and no written objections had been received prior thereto. <br />in meeting, approving assessrxent) . <br />Tabulation of Assessment shoued Total Assessable Cost to be <br />Ilo objections were registered <br />I 110 Objections were registered at the Hearing, <br />(See &solution of later in meeting, <br />Tabulation of Assessment showed Total ;issessable Cost to be $5,613.82, <br />i?o objections were registered at the Hearing, <br />(See Resolution of laker