Members answering Rollcall were Beim, Dickson, Kohler, Tupa and Bredesen. I
<br />Minutes of Regular Meeting of Janu'ary 26, 1959, were approved as submitted, by
<br />motion Dickson, seconded by Tupa and carried.
<br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REZONING TO C0IIJV"ITY STORE DISTRICT FOR BILThlORE
<br />MOTOR HOTEL.
<br />January 26th Hearings, opened with Mr, Jerry Swendseen presenting plan and
<br />layout for the motel extension. Planning Director Swanson suggested that the
<br />property owners dedicate sufficient property to complete a full-width "!'J.53rd
<br />Street", and hlr. Swendseen agreed to this proposal.
<br />reiterated statements, in objection, made at the earlier meetings; and Mr.
<br />Larson asked how Council could control the use of the property for "motel
<br />purposes'' only, if the propeety is to be rezoned "Community Store".
<br />Attorney Hasselquist told Council that rezoning for a single purpose is not
<br />legal, but that a deed restriction can be obtained if the Council so desires.
<br />Stating that the extension of the motel is the only purpose for which petitioners
<br />are asking rezoning, Mr. Swendseen agreed to such a deed restriction; also stating,
<br />in reply to a question by Trustee Dickson, that if a restaurant is installed it is
<br />hoped that it can be in the center of the development and not at either end.
<br />Francis McGuire said that in view of Council's action at the last meeting, rezoning
<br />for the Overholt Office Building, he has no objection to the motel extension.
<br />Question was raised as to the reason for asking for rezoning for the area
<br />Southwest of the property proposed to be built ons and fAr. Iiarry Gustafson
<br />replied that this property, low and unbuildable, will be used for access to
<br />proposed new #169.
<br />deed restriction for the property hereinafter described in proposed ordinance,
<br />permitting its use for motel purposes only; and with the specific understanding
<br />between the developers and the Council that development will be in confbrmance
<br />with layout presented at this meeting and that any great variance will be with
<br />permission of the Village Planning Commission, Trustee Mohler also offered the
<br />following Ordinance, moving that Council waive second reading and adopt Ordinance
<br />as. read:
<br />This Hearing, being a continuation of October 2'7, 1958, and
<br />Messrs Pratt and Larson
<br />Moving that the Village Attorney be directed to prepare a
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-44
<br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
<br />OF EDINA BY ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL
<br />COI\IIIVIIJNITY STORE DISTRICT
<br />THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
<br />Section 1. Section 6, Community Store District, of Ordinance No. 261 of the
<br />Revised Ordinances of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further.amended
<br />by adding at the end of paragraph 1 of said Section 6 an additional sub-paragraph
<br />as follows:
<br />"[jj) That part of Govt. Lot 7, Sec. 28, Twp. 117, R. 21, described
<br />as commencing at a pt. on the N. Line of Govt. Lot 7 dist. 545
<br />Ft. !'J. of NE Cor. thereof; th. S. parallel to E. line of said
<br />Govt. Lot 7 a dist. of 708 Ft. to pt. of beginning; th, S.
<br />parallel to said E. line 190 Ft.; th. We parallel to M. line of
<br />said Govt. Lot 7 to Vi. line thereof; the S. to SW Cor. of said
<br />Govt. Lot 7; th. E. along S. line thereof to IWly RFJJ line of
<br />U. S. Hwy. No. 169; th. NEly along said f~:IpJly RIA line to its
<br />Intersection with a line drawn E., parallel to N. line of said
<br />Govt. Lot 7, from the pt. of beginning; th. R. to pt, or'
<br />beginning. I'
<br />Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
<br />its passage and publication.
<br />Kohler's motions, as to deed restrictions and for waiver of second reading and
<br />adoption of Ordinance as submitted, were seconded by Trustee Dickssn;and $he first
<br />motion carried. On Rollcall as to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, there were
<br />five ayes and no nays, as follows: Beim, aye; Dickson, aye; Kohler, aye; Tupa,
<br />aye; and Eredesen, aye; and the Ordinance was adopted.
<br />PUBLIC KEPEIKG ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO "OPEN DEVELOPMENT" SECTLOR OF ZOI'IIIdG
<br />ORDINANCE, CLARIFYII\IG SIDE-YARD SETBACK PROVISION. This Hearing, scheduled in
<br />response to Planning Commission's recommendation for clafification of the "side-
<br />yard setback" provision in the Open Development Section of the Zoning Ordinance,
<br />was held with receipt of no objections, either oral or written, to the proposed
<br />new Ordinance. Afr"idavits of Publication and Posting of Kotice of Hearing were
<br />submitted, approved, and ordered placed on file; and Dickson offered the following
<br />Ordinance, moving that Council dispense with second reading and adopt Ordinance
<br />as submitted: