Laserfiche WebLink
7/8/63 <br />33 <br />4 ru 3 c9 <br />in <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL , HELD MONDAY, <br />JULY 8, 1963, AT 7:OO P.M., AT THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE HALL <br />Members answering Rollcall were MacMillan, Rixe, %pa, VanValkenburg and Bredesen. I <br />MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of June 24, 1963, were approved as submitted, by <br />Motion VanValkenburg, seconded by Macl4illan and carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING,ON STOW DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PETITION FOR REZONING OF TRACT L, NELSON <br />FARM FOR GASOLINE FILLING STATION USE, CONTINUED TO JULY 22. Attorney Josiah Brill, <br />representing Stow Development Company, told Council he felt there was no need for <br />another presentation on this petition; that Hearing had been continued from June 24, <br />for the Village Attorney's opinion, and he hoped this opinion wo'uld be ready this <br />evening. <br />and Public Hearing was continued to July 22, by motion VanValkenburg, seconded by <br />RFxe and carried. <br />reminded Council that one reason for the continuance from June 24 vas to give <br />Pure Oil Company an opportunity to explain why, in the opinion of the Company, one <br />site should be more valuable than the other. Mr. Brill stated he had talked with <br />Mr, Edwards of the Company, who had told him that because of other matters the <br />Company now has pending with the Village the Company prefers not to get into any <br />controversy with the Village. Mr. E. C. Stow added Mr. Edwards has told him he <br />will be glad to state the Company's position in a letter, relative to the comparative <br />value of the two sites. <br />Mr. Hasselquist reported that his opinion has not yet been completed, <br />A little later in the meeting, Village Attorney Hasselquist <br />WOLD PROPERTY ON VALLEY VIEW ROAD (4405) REZONED R-4 MULTIPLE FESIDENCE DISTRICT, <br />FOR 14-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING. In accordance with Published Notice of Hearing, <br />Formal Public Hearing was held at this time on the Petition of Mr. Folke Victorsen <br />for the Rezoning to Multiple Residence District R-4 of the Wold Property at 4405 <br />Valley View Road. (Informal Hearing had been held June 24, on mailed notice, but <br />it was discovered proper published notice had not been given). <br />that the proposed 14-unit apartment building meets requirements of zoning ordinance <br />in every respect except one--that of setback from front lot line--and that Mr. <br />Victorsen is requesting (and Planning Commission recommends favorably on) variance <br />from this requirement to permit a 25-foot setback. <br />and its relation to other buildings in the area, was presented. <br />4440 Garrison Lane, objected to the size of the proposed building, saying he has had <br />two appraisals and finds this apartment will depreciate the value of his property <br />by about $l,OOO--and that property closer to the apartment will be depreciated by <br />more than this. Saying that throughout the years the policy of the Planning <br />Commission has been to use two-family and three-family dwellings adjacent to <br />residential properties, Mr. Palen said he would have no objection to this use of <br />the property, <br />will make storm sewer construction necessary, for which the one-family dwellings <br />in the area will be assessed, because the westerly lots are more shallow and the <br />present pond between Valley View Road and Garrison Lane would have to be filled. <br />Mrb Hite informed Council that there is now a drain from the pond; that this <br />particular apartment willmot endanger the pond. There were no other objections <br />registered, and none had been received prior 'to the Hearing. <br />that several of his neighbors had not received notice, and Mr. Hite reported that <br />notice was sent to owners of a11 properties within 500 feet of the site of proposed <br />apartment, and that several property owners have talked with him concerning it. <br />Mr,:'ViCtorsen asked that his petition be granted, saying he feels the lot is right <br />for this use, that he has done a good job with the apartments he has already <br />constructed in this area and that, if granted this request, will improve this <br />neighborhood. <br />Council dispense with second reading and adopt Ordinance as submitted: <br />Mr. Hite told Council <br />A plan of proposed building, <br />Mr. Richard Palen, <br />He added he is concerned that additional apartments to the west <br />Mr. Palen complained <br />VanValkenburg then offered the following Drdiiianbe; mding that <br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-76 <br />AN ORDIIIANCC ALENDIXG ORDIITAiYCE '140. 261 (ZONING <br />ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, ESTABLISHING <br />ADDITIONAL R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT <br />THE VILLAGE COUIICIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDIiIA, MIWNESOTA, ' ORDAINS : <br />Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances <br />Section 1. Paragraph 1 , Multiple Residence District Boundaries, of <br />of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby-.amended by addiiig the following <br />sub-paragraph under District R-4 : <br />District R-4 : <br />"(3) The East 133 Ft. of West 658.5 Ft. of II. 268 Ft. of W1/4 of <br />NE 1/4, except road - Section 30, Township 28, Range 24 <br />(Parcel No. 7420)". <br />Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after <br />- <br />its passage and publication according to law.