Laserfiche WebLink
9/23/63 <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY , <br />SEPTEMBER 23, 1963, AT 7:OO P.N., AT <br />THE EDINA VILLAGE HALL <br />Members answering Rollcall were MacMillan, Rixe, Tupa, VanValkenburg and Bredesen. <br />MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 9, 1963, were approved as submitted, <br />by motion VanValkenburg, seconded by Macblillan and carried. <br />REVISED PLANS FOR HERITAGE BOARDING HOME APPROVED. <br />on the proposed Revised Plans for Heritage Boarding Home as first presented to <br />Council by Planning Director Hite on July 22; being for a four-story building, <br />rather than the 2-1/2 story building first approved. <br />that he had contacted neighbors in accordance with Councills July 22nd directive, <br />There were no objections from the floor, and the Clerk had received no written <br />objections prior to this Hearing. <br />favorable. <br />Planning Commissionls recommendation was seconded by VanValkenburg and carried. <br />Public Hearing was conducted <br />Mr. Hite iFformed Council <br />Planning Commission's recommendation is <br />Tupa's motion for approval of Revised Plan in accordance with <br />LOTS 15, 16, 17, 18 AND 19, BLOCK 3, BROOKVIEN HEIGHTS THIRD ADDITION REZONED <br />FRObI OPEN DEVELOPNENT DISTRICT TO R-2 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT. <br />was conducted on the petition of 14r. cb Db Jagobson for the Rezoning from Open <br />Development District to R-2 14ultiple Residence District of Lots 15 to 19 inclusive, <br />Block 3, Brookview Heights Third Addition, being five lots abutting W.70th Street <br />on the north, across from the NSP building. <br />the Planning Commission has .Tecommended favorably on this petition; that theSe <br />five lots will be replatted into either three or four tracts with a minimum <br />frontage of 100 feet. There were no objections registered at the Hearing, and <br />the Clerk had received no written objections prior thereto. Notice of Hearing <br />was pasred on officiaL-Village Eulletin'boards, and copies of notice mailed to <br />affected property owners. Trustee Tupa inquired as to whether Village will <br />receive the rear of these lots for park purposes, and Mr. Hite replied that <br />owner will make this dedication of land. <br />moving that Council dispense with second reading and adopt Ordinance as submitted: <br />Public Hearing <br />Planning Director Hite told Council <br />?- <br />MacMillan offered the following Ordinance, <br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-77 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 (ZONING <br />ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, ESTABZISHING <br />R-2 MULTIPLE REXIDENCE DISTRICT <br />THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: . <br />Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordiy <br />nances of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding <br />the following sub-paragraph: <br />I Section 1. Paragraph 1, f4ultiple Residence District Boundaries, of <br />District R-2 : <br />"(1) Lots 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; Block 3, Brookview Heights Third Addition. <br />Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from.and <br />after its passage and publication according to law, <br />waiver of second reading and <br />Motion for/adoption of OrdLnanbei was seconded by &pa, and on Rollcall there were <br />five ayes and no nays, as follows: MacMill <br />VanValkenburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and nance was <br />SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED FOR STORM SEUER IMPROVEMENT NO. 67. Action on this <br />proposed Special Assessment had been delayed pending Engineer's investigation of <br />the complaint registered September 9, at Public Hearing, by Mrs. J. A. Faching, <br />5928 France Avenue, that her property is not benefited by the improvement because <br />it does not drain to the sewer, Village Engineer tlegner reported that elevations <br />have been run, giving evidence that property does definitely drain to sewer, and <br />that he has so reported to Mrs. Faching this afternoon. <br />nothing to do but to recommend that this property remain a part of the benefited <br />district and be assessed for the improvement. <br />Assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. 67 be approved as originally tabulated, <br />was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried. (See Resolution of later in Neeting, <br />He added that there is <br />VanValkenburg's motion, that <br />. <br />Adopting and Confirming Assessment) . ." <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR STFEET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-50 CONTINUED <br />TO OCTOBER 7, FOR REPORT OF CHURCH ACTION. Hearing on this proposed assessment <br />had been continued from September 9, pursuant to a request that the property of <br />Good Samaritan Methodist Church be assessed for its full footage. Manager Hyde <br />reported that a survey has shown that in dedicating for Wycliffe Road, in order <br />to provide better lots for the subdivision, the Church stipulated there would be