<br />I.II>UTES OF THE REGULAR l*EETIi\IG OF THE EDIMA VILLAGE
<br />COUWCIL, HELD IIONDAY, AUGUST 17, 1964, AT 7:OO P.i4.,
<br />AT THE EDIIJA VILLAGE IlALL
<br />Hembers answering Rollcall were I.iacLlillan, Kixe , Tupa and Bredesen.
<br />XLNUTES of the Regular Heeting of August 3, 1964, were approved as submitted, by
<br />motion Xacl3illan, seconded by Tupa and carried.
<br />COUMCIL COiJTIiJUES SPECIAL ASSESSIEMT HEARING 021 Si&ITARY SENER II*IPROVLLELIT i?G b , 3-88,
<br />SUB-TRUBL AND UTLUL, TO StPTEIlBER 14, FOk IiIVESTIGATIO,i? Oi4 TW UIJPLATTED TZACTS
<br />Clerk presented Affidavits of Publication, and oE isjailing to owners of affected
<br />progerties of "Notice of Assessment gearing on Sanitary Sewer Improvement ,ior 188,
<br />Sub-Trunk and Lateral Connections", publication having been in Edina-iJorningside
<br />Couries? July 30 and August 6, 1964.
<br />placed on file; and, pursuant to due notice given, Public Hearing was called on the
<br />proposed Special Assessment for the cost of CONSTRUCTION OF SUB-TRUNK AiJD LATERAL
<br />SANITAXY SEWER K?D APPURTEIIAKES AS FOLLOtJS :
<br />I Affidavits iqere approved as to form and ordered
<br />In Gleason Road from existing Sanitary Sewer manhole at centerline of
<br />Gleason Road and intersection of the North line of Section 6, Townshi2 116,
<br />Range 21, South 450 feet; then Gleason Road from South right-of-way line of
<br />Crosstown Highway to Valley View Road and proposed street in Lot 27, Auditor's
<br />Subdivision No. 196 fiqon Gleason Road to existing sewer manhole located at
<br />1% corner of said Lot 27.
<br />TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST, Tabulation of Proposed Assessment was given as follows:
<br />$18,851.99 for the Sub-Trunk Sexer, proposed to be assessed at $60.23 per Assessable
<br />Lot, against 313 Assessable Lots; this compared with an Estimate of $66.00 per Lot.
<br />TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST FOR LXtERAL CONHECTIOIJS , $62,963.62, proposed to be assessed
<br />against 59 Lots, for $1,067.18 per Lot, as compared with an Improvement bearing,
<br />Estimate of $1200.00 per Lot.
<br />For tbose tracts as yet unplatted, the llper lot" assessment is based on a formula oE
<br />1-3/4 lots per acre.
<br />Attorney Charles Root, 5602 Garfield Avenue South, Ilinneapolis, speaking in
<br />behalf of the Evart Carlson Estate, objected to the proposed assessixent on the
<br />grounds that the assessment for the Carlson property (Lot 22, Auditor's Subd,ijo. 196)
<br />has been computed on the basis of 22 Acres, whereas his survey shows only 19.46 acres
<br />it €or 25.12 Assessable Lots.
<br />Xr. Folke Victorsen, 56U5 Apshire Blvd., owner of a part of Lots 18 and 19, and
<br />all of Lots 20 and 21, Auditor's Subdivision 110. 196, protested that there is no
<br />possiule chance of his platting 32 good lots from this land, because of its hilly
<br />preliminary plat he showed the Council was for 27 lots.
<br />saying he had expected to plat with bir. Evart Carlson, but that plans have had to
<br />be changed because of Hr. Carlson's untimely death,
<br />properties will mean a higher unit assessment for a11 pro2erties in the assessable
<br />area, and Tupa moved for continuance of Public Hearing on Proposed AssessItent for
<br />Sanifary Sewer Impovement lio. 183 to llonday, Septerier 14, for investibation of
<br />the claims of i4essrs. Root and Victorsen.
<br />iJo other objections had been made from the ?loor, nor had written oujections been
<br />received prior to the Hearing.
<br />Be asked that the p?o$osed assessyent ba changed for this property to assess
<br />He estimated that 20 buildable lots could be platted, although the
<br />He explained this by
<br />It was noted by the Council that any reduction in assessment for these two
<br />lIotion seconded b2 i.Iaci4illan and carried.
<br />COUISCIL LEVIES SPECIAL BSSESSdEIJT FOR STPXET IidPROVE1EiST iJ0. E-18 , POXfLAISD CEL-BiT
<br />COXXETE PAVING ifITH IdTEGRAL CUR3. Public Hearing was next called on poposed
<br />Assessment for Street Im2rovement No. 18, pursuant to "iJotice of Assessment Hearing
<br />on Street Im2rovement 110. E-18" published in Edina-2-lorningside Courier July 30 ana
<br />August 6, 1964, and iiotices of Hearing mailed to owners of affected properties, as
<br />per Affidavits of Publication and Idailing presented by Clerk, approve$ q~ &QDfp&-fiyd
<br />VITH IiJTEGRAL Cum on a number of miscellaneous streets throughout the Village,
<br />including the streets in "Edina Parklands" Addition and the South 2/3 of "Chapel
<br />Hill" Addition.
<br />Hearing'' puolished and set forth in the 14inutes of August 3, 1964, Page 176, this
<br />Giinute ijook.
<br />$245,331.48, Less 10% Village Share, $24,536.99, €or Assessable Cost of $220,794.49,
<br />proposed to be assessed against 21,796.1 Assessable Feet, for $10.13 per Assessable
<br />Foot, as compared with Improvement Hearing Estimate of $10.41,
<br />As to the proposed Chapel Hill Assessment, Council reviewed report that Lot I,
<br />Block 2, and Lot 9, alock 4, Chagel Hill--which have previously been assessed on a
<br />Qer-lot basis for STREET IGiPROVEiJEiJT NO. 3A-35--have not been included in the
<br />proposed Assessment for Street Improvement Bo. E-18, together with the thought that
<br />these two lots should be assessed for 1/3 of the street frontage for the long side
<br />of their respective lots--with an Assessment of $421.41 for Lot 1, Block 2, and an
<br />Assessment of $337.33 for Lot 9, Block 4--which would reduce the progosed assessment
<br />to the balance of the lots in Cha2el Hill from $1,039.00 to $1,020.40 per Lot.
<br />proposed "Per Lot" Assessmant in this particular area is computed by multiplying the
<br />ordered placed on file. This improvement covers the Construction of/C tL i4CKE;TIE j?AVIi?G
<br />The streets improved are listed in detail in the "Hotice of Public
<br />TABULATIOIi OF ASSESSLEXT was as follor~s : Total Construction Cost,