Laserfiche WebLink
10 /18/6 5 <br />HINUTES OF THE REGULAR NEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1965, <br />EDINA VILLAGE HALL <br />ROLLCALL was answered by members Macl.iillan, Tupa, VanValkenburg and Bredesen. <br />ATTORNEY'S REMARKS ON RE-ASSESSMENT POLICY NOTED. <br />in advising them relative to Storm Sewer No. 80 at the meeting of October 4, on <br />conditions by which Council could call for a Re-assessment Hearing, he neglected to <br />mehtion that this action for re-assessment could also be taken if Council considered. <br />the assessment excessive , <br />remarks were merely noted for the record. Mr. Whitlock stated that he had also given <br />this information to Mr. Thorpe's attorney. <br />Mr. Ilhitlock informed Council that <br />This condition, however, did not exist and Mr. Glhitlock' s <br />SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS. , Clerk presented Affidavits of <br />Mailing and of Publication in the Edina-Morningside Courier, which Affidavits were <br />approved as to form and ordered placed on file. <br />Hearings were conducted and action was taken by the Council as hereinafter recorded: <br />Pursuant to due notice given, Public <br />PROPOSED- ASSESStENT FOR STREET IWROVEt4ENT NO. B-76 APPROVED, <br />was presented-by blanager Hyde who gave the cost of $5,451.60 to be assessedon 1,320 <br />Tabulation of assessment <br />Sssessable feet. at a cost of $4.13-per assessable foot. <br />offer objections at the meeting and none had been presented prior thereto. <br />motion for approval of Special Assessment No. B-76 was seconded by VanValkenburg and <br />unanimously carried, <br />No persons were present to <br />1.lacMillan's <br />(See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes . ) <br />PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR STREET 114PROVEbSENT NO, S-3 APPROVED. <br />was presented by ldr. Hyde who gave the total construction cost at $5,685.16 to be <br />assessed la-t+$3i364-,~e~?,.iissessahle foa2 on 1,690 assessable feet . <br />presented at Hearing and none had been received prior ther-to, <br />offered the following Resolution.and moved its adoption: <br />Tabulation of assessment <br />No objectibns were <br />VanValkenburg then <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFLRi.fING ASSESSbENTS FOR <br />STIEET IMPROVEMENTS NOS. B-76 AND S-3 <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: <br />assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such hearings <br />held on October 18, 1965, has considered all oral and written objections presented <br />against the levy of such assessmentsI <br />office of the Village Clerk for the Street Improvements Nos. B-76 and S-3 does not <br />exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract or parcel <br />of Land so assessed, and a11 of said.assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as <br />the proper assessments on account of said respective improvements to be spread against <br />the benefited lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein. <br />The assessments shall be payable in five equal annuaL installments, the first <br />installment to be payable in 1966, and all unpaid installments shall bear interest at <br />the rate of 6.05% per annum. <br />The Village Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor <br />a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments, with each <br />then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the tax <br />lists of the County in accordance with this resolution. <br />payable by a county, a political subdivision or by the owner of any right-of-way, as <br />required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such <br />assessment is not paid in a single installment, the Village Treasurer shall arrange <br />for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said section. <br />Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded <br />four ayes and no nays and the Resolution was ado <br />ATTEST : <br />1. The Village has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed <br />2, Each of the assessments as set Eorth in the assessment rolls on file in the <br />3. <br />4, <br />5. The Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessments whikh may be <br />a11 there were <br />IIPROVELGNT NO. 765 REFERRED TO VILLAGE ATTORNEY RELATIVE TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, <br />Mr. Hyde informed Council that this improvement was for the removal of a house at <br />5820 St. Johns Avenue in the amount of $335.00 to be levied against Lot 6, Block a, <br />Fairfax Addition. Mr. Hyde stated that Earl A. Carlson, owner of the property, had <br />protested that only $100 could be assessed. <br />by Tupa, and unanimously carried, the assessment was referred to Attorney Whitlock <br />for clarification as to whether or not $100 could be )charged for each of three <br />nuisances: one for the removal of the house, one for removal of the basement, and <br />one for filling in the backyard. <br />By motion of VanValkenburg, seconded <br />i