1888-1989 Archive Minutes
Minutes 1958 - 1974
12/24/2013 8:08:58 AM
12/23/2013 11:47:10 AM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON <br />MONDAY, JUNE 3, 1968 <br />Members answering rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Shaw, VanValkenburg, <br />and Mayor Bredesen, . <br />MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of May 20, 1968, were approved as corrected by <br />motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg, and carried. <br />Councilman Johnson moved an amendment to make a correction in the minutes on page <br />92, ninth line from the bottom. <br />"Community Store .** <br />ORDINANCE #261-16'1 APPROVED ON SECOND READING. <br />byVillage Manager and had been placed on file at first reading. <br />that the problem here on Mr. DUOOS'S project was that the hearing had been continued <br />until the deed restriction coald be filed, so that Mr, Duoos could use the further <br />proposed plan, but he hadn't purchased the land and doesn't have fee title to it. <br />He has filed a letter confirming his willingness to file a deed restriction to limit <br />the use of this land to not more than twenty-four units and a height of not more <br />than two stories above the basement. <br />pass the ordinance but not publish it until the deed restriction is filed. <br />Hite said that the Vernon Avenue traffic situation at Hansen Road could be eased <br />by reinstalling the left turn lanes on Vernon and by improving the radius for <br />northbound Hansen. <br />soon as they can get to it. <br />Duoos was present and had drawings of proposed building. <br />offered Second Reading with provision that we hold publication until deed res- <br />triction is filed, as follows: <br />Where it says "C-1" he corrected it to read, <br />I Affidavits of Notice were presented <br />Mr. Hyde said <br />Mr. Hyde pointed out that it is possible to <br />Mr. <br />The county has advised that they will make both changes as <br />Nobody wished to be heard in this connection. Mr. <br />Councilman Johnson <br />ORDINANCE NO; 261-161 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 <br />* (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA <br />THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: <br />(Miultiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances of the <br />Village of Edina,*as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following <br />subparagraph: <br />ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT <br />Section 1. Paragraph 1, Multiple Residence District Boundaries of Section 4, <br />District R-4 : <br />"(27)s Lots Thirteen (13) and Fourteen (14), Richmond Hills I11 Addition <br />Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after <br />and Parcel 2100 in Section 33, Township 117, Range 21." <br />its passage and publication according to law. <br />Motion for adoption of ordinance was seconded <br />there were five ayes and the ordinance was ad <br />Y Mayor <br />Deputy Village Cler <br />ORDINANCE 8261-162 GRANTED SECOND READING. <br />by Village Manager and had been placed on file at first reading. <br />dicated that this rezoning for Norman Construction Company had been granted first <br />reading on May 20, pending the legal status of the zoning. <br />Schwartzbauer states the entire history and says that Council should approve the <br />rezoning to R-4 and grant the variances since these requirements where variances <br />are necessary under R-4 zoning would not have been applicable under Community <br />Stores zoning in existence when the permit was issued. Mr. Hyde further stated <br />that we have had one request from neighbors to the south that could be easily . <br />complied with. <br />south of Valley View, and the neighbors have requested that we not sell it. TJe <br />have had an offer from one of the neighbors in the area, but the offer was not <br />sufficiently good, and there is no necessity for selling, so the opinion was that <br />we should probably keep it as a buffer. <br />Avenue, made the statement that he wasn't in the country when First Reading was <br />made and would like to ask what Second Reading meant, and what does legal reading. <br />mean? <br />Mayor Bredesen pointed out that we have opinions from our attorneys showing that <br />we did rezone for this purpose on at least two occasions, and as a result their <br />Affidavits of Notice were presented <br />Mr. Hyde in- <br />A letter from Attorney <br />The Village owns land there for drainage purposes on Wooddale <br />Mr. Michael E. Birt, 6113 St. Johns <br />He also asked why must the rezoning take place? Could we not rezone?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.