1888-1989 Archive Minutes
Minutes 1958 - 1974
12/24/2013 8:08:59 AM
12/23/2013 11:47:19 AM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1968 <br />ROLLCALL was answered by Councilmen Courtney, Shaw, Johnson and VanValkenburg <br />sho served as Mayor Pro Tern in the abgence of Mayor Bredesen. <br />LOUKAS M. ANGELUS RECOGNIZED UPON COMPLETION OF COURSE. <br />Valkenburg recognized the achievement of Mr. Loukas M. Agnelus in completing <br />a course offered by the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-174 ADOPTED iT SECOND READING. <br />request of Mr. E. G. Thernell for R-2 zoning of property located at Gleason <br />Road at Vernon Avenue, for second reading. <br />man Johnson offered Ordinance No. 261-174 for Second Reading and moved its <br />adoption as follows : <br />Mayor Pro Tem Van <br />Mr. Hoisington presented the <br />No comments being heard, Council- <br />ORDINANCE NO. 261-174 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 <br />(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA <br />ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL R-2 <br />MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT <br />THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: <br />Section 1. Paragraph 1, Multiple Residence District Boundaries of <br />Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised <br />ordinances of the Village of Edina, is 'hereby amendhd'by adding the following <br />sub-p ar agr aph : <br />Di s tric t R- 2 : <br />"(48) Lots One (1) and Thirty (30) , Block <Three (3), <br />and Lots One'(1) and !Cwenty-Six (26)', Block <br />Two (2) , Killarney Shores Addition" <br />Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and <br />after its passage and publication according to law. <br />Motion for adoption of the resolution was se <br />rollcall there were four ayes and no nays an <br />ATTEST : <br />NORTHERN STATES POWER POLICIES QUESTIONED BY MINNEAPOLIS HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION. <br />Mr. Hyde called attention of Council to a letter received from the Minneapolis <br />Home Builders Association, calling attention to certain Underground Residential <br />Districution policies of Northern States Power which the Association feels should' <br />be eliminated. The Village was asked to assist in working to eliminate these <br />procedures. Following some discussion, Councilman Johnson's motion that the * <br />letter be acknowledged and that the matter be taken under advisement for further <br />study was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. <br />PETITION RECEIVED for watermain to serve Ridgeway Road, Westridge Blvd., and High- <br />land Road was presented and ordered referred to the Engineering Department for <br />processing by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and <br />carried. <br />M AND JAY TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. OPERATIONS REMOVED. Mr. Hoisington advised <br />Council that M &Jay Trucking Go., Inc., had ceased operations at 707 Washington <br />Avenue South, as requested by the Village. <br />ARNESON PLAT APPROVAL HEARING DATE SET for November 18, 1968, by motion of Coun- <br />cilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. <br />SIGN ORDINANCE 61C ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. <br />ance 61C for Second Reading. <br />Mr. Robert Naegele, representing Naegele Sign Company. Discussion ensued rela- <br />tive to the opinion of the Village Attorney which had advised that the proposed <br />ordinance is in all likelihood constitutional with the possible exception of <br />Section 4, which limits Billboards to certain areas temporarily zoned as excav- <br />ation districts. <br />should be re-evaluated when that decision is handed down. <br />discussion, Councilman Courtney offered Ordinance 61C for Second Reading and <br />moved its adoption as follows: <br />Mr. Hoisington presented Ordin- <br />Sketches of double-faced signs were presented by <br />Mr. Whitlock noted that a case pending in the Supreme Court <br />may have some bearing on this issue and that this section of the ordinance I Following considerable
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.