Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON <br />MONDAY, JULY 19, 1971 <br />Members answering rollcall were Councilman Courtney, Johnson, VanValkenburg <br />and Mayor Bredesen. <br />BIDS AWARDED FOR BA-185 AND C-110 Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of the bids <br />received in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina Sun on June 24, <br />.and published in the Construction Bulletin on June 24, July 1 and July 8, for <br />Proposal A Improvement No. BA-185 showing Riegger Roadways, Inc. lowest <br />bidder at $174,757.18; Bury & Carbon, Inc., $174,880.31; H.J.A. Construction <br />Company, $182,482.64; Northwest Bituminous Company, Inc., $186,611.43; <br />Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company, $191,081.86; McNamara Vivant Contracting <br />Company, Inc., $210,466.74; C.S. McCrossan, Inc. $232,445.89. Councilman <br />Courtney's motion awarding contract to the recommended low bidder of Proposal <br />A was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. <br />Improvement No. (2-110 showed Schutz Contracting Company, Inc., low bidder <br />at $92,420.00; J.A. Danens & Sons, Inc. $94,540; Fischer Sand &Aggregate, <br />Inc., $99,190; M.G. Astleford Company, Inc. $102,050; H.J.A. Construction <br />Company, $107,878; Shafer Contracting Company, Inc., $110,120; Carl H, <br />Peterson Company, $112,614; and C.S. McCrossan, Inc. $128,780. Mr. Hyde <br />reported the low bidder on Proposal B is a contracting company the Village <br />has not done business with previously. After further discussion Councilman <br />Johnson moved the award of bid be continued so the Engineering Department <br />can investigate this company. Councilman VanValkenburg seconded and motion <br />carried. Mrs. Schutz, Secretary-Treasurer of Schutz Contracting Company <br />spoke, stating since they were low bidder they would like to have the bid <br />awarded at this meeting. She also stated that her-company is bonded by <br />United States Fidelity &Guaranty Company, the Company has a good reputation, <br />it is a young company and does have the equipment. Mr. Dunn reported that <br />in a case of this type when the Village has not previously done business with <br />a contracting company, an investigation is made to determine financial <br />stability of the company, equipment available and previous work of this type. <br />Mrs. Schutz reported they have done work for the State of Minnesota and the <br />City of Minneapolis. <br />subject to the investigation of the Engineering Department as to the res- <br />ponsibility of the Company. Councilman VanValkenburg seconded and motion <br />carried. <br />Proposal B Grading <br />Councilman Johnson then moved awarde of the bid be <br />CITY OF BLOOMINGTON ORDINANCE NINE MILE CREEK TABLED. <br />this communication is in regard to the 76th Street interchange and the high- <br />way work partially in Edina and partially in Bloomington. <br />Bloomington is requesting considerable change in the plans that have already <br />been approved. <br />pay considerably more attention to ecological matters from the standpoint of <br />the protection of the creek and he has no objection to the resolution <br />submitted by Bloomington with the exception of the statement that pertains <br />to storm water treatment. After further discussion Councilman Courtney <br />moved to table any action until some reaction is received from the Nine <br />Mile Creek Managers or the State Department also until the Pollution Control <br />Agency takes some action. <br />and carried. <br />ME. Hyde reported <br />The city of <br />Mr. Dunn stated that the resolution is requesting the District <br />Motion was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg <br />NAME.CHANGE FOR TUPA DRIVE DENIED. Mr. Hyde statedc:that in the plat of Braemar <br />Hills a street and a circle were named Tupa Drive and a permit has been <br />issued for one home so far. These people are requesting a name change to <br />Rolling Hills Drive. Mr. Fred Peterson, owner of the house being built, <br />stated he felt that the street should have a name more descriptive of the <br />area, Mayor Bredesen asked how many lots are on this plat and Mr. Dunn <br />reported about a dozen lots would be on Tupa Drive itself and on Tupa <br />Circle about four more lots. <br />more people on the street he would be against changing the name from this <br />petition. <br />move in that they then consider a change when a petition is received. <br />Peterson agreed that only one property owner petitioning the name change <br />was inadequate and he will go ahead and get others to sign a petition to <br />change the name. <br />on the petition for the name change the matter be denied at this time. <br />Councilman Courtney seconded and motion carried. <br />Councilman Courtney stated he'felt that until $here are <br />Councilman Johnson suggested that when the other property owners <br />Mr. <br />Councilman Johnson moved that based on just one signature