Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF TJlE REGULAE BEETING OF THE <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON <br />~ * MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1971 <br />Members answering roll’call weie Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, and Van Valken- <br />burg who served as Mayor Pro Tem until the arrival of Mayor Bredesen later in <br />the meeting. <br />MINUTES of August 16, 1971, were approved as corrected by motion of Councilman <br />Bohhson, secogded by Councilman Courtney and carried. The correction was with <br />reference to preliminary plat approval of Braemar Oaks to reflect that the cash <br />struction og the proposed tennis courts. <br />approved as submitted by motion of Councilman Courtney,, seconded by Mayor Pro <br />Tem VanValkenburg and carried. <br />DR. RALPH LIEBER, lkW SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 SUPERINTENDENT INTRODUCED, by School <br />District Board Members Mr. David Hansen and Dr. John Hoyt. <br />1972 BUDGET PRESENTED. <br />statute, noting that the proposed budget contemplates a proposed tax levy of <br />$2,101,172 with an estimated proposed mill rate of 24.56 (for the Village only). <br />Mr. Hyde added that his Budget Message was’lgss clear than usual because of the <br />wage-price freeze and the lack,of legislation by the State for financing over <br />the next two years. The proposed budget was accepted for review by motion of <br />Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. <br />. donated for park purposes by the other developers be earmarked for the’con- <br />Minutes of August 24, 1971, were <br />Mr. Hyde presented the 1972 Budget as required by state <br />NUMEROUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED. <br />Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant Bo due notice <br />given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth. <br />A. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-252 in the following: <br />Garrison Lane from Nooddale Avenue to cul-de-sac <br />Mr. Hyde presented analysis of assessment showing proposed assessment of <br />$784.05 per assessable lot as against estimated assessment of $686.37. <br />Richard G. Palen, 44GO Garrison Lane, was assured by Mr. Dunn that the increase <br />over the estimated assessment was in no way due to the time spent looking €or <br />a leak in the watermain. <br />received prior thereto. .(See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes) <br />B. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-164 in the following: <br />Affidavits of Notice were presented by <br />Mr. <br />No further objections were heard and none had ,been <br />‘Wooddale Avenue from Valley View Road to Garrison Lane <br />Garrison Lane from IaJooddale Avenue East to cul-de-sac <br />. I <br />Mr. Hyde presented analysis-of assessment showing proposed assessment at $17.79 <br />per assessable foot against estimated assessment of $18.38 per assessable foot. <br />No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. <br />Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) <br />C. GRADING 1HP.ROVEMENT’INQ. .C-95 in the following: <br />Gleason Road from Schey Drive to Loch Moor Drive <br />Mr. Hyde presenfed analysis of assessment showing proposed assessment at $10.52 <br />per assessable foot as against estimated assessment of $8.57 per assessable <br />foot. It was noted that the increase in cost was the result of the request of <br />the property owners requesting that the street be rhed after it was graded. <br />STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-172 in the following? <br />Mr. Hyde presented analysis of assessment showing proposed assessment of $14.32 <br />as against estimated assessment of $12.00 per assessable foot, noting that in <br />this case also the increase in the assessment was the result of the request <br />of property owners that the street be raised after it was graded. No bbject- <br />ions were heard and none had been received prior thereto. <br />Ordering Assessment, later in Minutes.) <br />E. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-119 in the following: <br />Mr. Hyde presented analysis of assessment showing proposed assessment of <br />$io1758 per assessable square foot against estimated assessment of $.01828 <br />per assessable square foot. <br />prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) <br />(See <br />. No objections were heard. (See Resolutian Ordering AsSes&ene. later in Minutes.) <br />Gleason Road from Schey Drive to Loch Moor Drive <br />(See Resolution <br />0 Gleason Road from Schey Drive to 1074 feet Northwesterly <br />No objections were heard and none had been received <br />F. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. B-79 in- the following: . The West 192.56 feet of Lot 24, Codes Highview Addition <br />Mr. Hyde presented analysis of assessment showing $735.04 as the proposed <br />assessment for the assessable lot. <br />received prior thereto. <br />G. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-128 ANI) BRIDGE NO. BR-3 In the following: <br />No objections were heard and none had been <br />(See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) <br />Benton Avenue from Crescent Drive to Hansen Road