1888-1989 Archive Minutes
Minutes 1958 - 1974
12/24/2013 8:09:05 AM
12/23/2013 11:48:34 AM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
58 <br />"UTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />IWCH 5, 1973 <br />EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON <br />Members answering rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Van Valkenburg <br />and Mayor Bredesen. I <br />r. .' -2 <br />BICYCLE-PEDESTRIAN PATHS REFERRED TO ENLARGED CO3EETTEE, <br />on February 23, 1973, was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered <br />placed on file. Mr. Dunn advised that this is an informal public hearing on <br />the construction of 23.16 miles of bicycle-commuter paths as set forth in a <br />proposal submitted to and approved for hearing by the Council on February 5, <br />1973, notice of hearing for which was sent to all property owners whose <br />boulevard area will be affected by the proposal. <br />Gleason Road, Chairman of the Committee which had made the original proposal <br />to the Council, presented transparencies of the report contained in the "Bicycle <br />and Commuter Paths". She pointed out that the plan calls for a bicycle com- <br />muter path network consisting of a primary route by which users could travel <br />safely to various points of interest, with a smaller system of connector routes <br />allowing for easy access to the primary routes. The third facet of the program <br />would be a scenic route for enjoyment. It was pointed out that routes were <br />selected after taking into consideration existing side.c;ralke, physical features <br />and safety factors, with financing of these paths proposed to be by Village <br />funds. Numerous residents were in the audience and numerous letters and peti- <br />tions had been received prior hereto, both favoring and opposing construction <br />of the paths. Approximately 374 residents had signed a petition circulated by <br />the Cornelia P.T.A. requesting: <br />1. Installation of sidewalks in the vicinity of Cornelia School -- along <br />11. 70th Street from France Ave. to T.H. 100 and beyond, along 72nd <br />Street from France Avenue West to Wooddale Avenue, along Cornelia <br />Drive from t1. 66th Street to W. 72nd Street, along Dunberry Lane from <br />Wooddale Ave. to Cornelia Drive, around Southdale and elsewhere as <br />appropriate. <br />Establish tighter traffic controls at 11. 70th Street and Cornelia <br />Drive, and reduced speed signs along 17. 70th Street on approaches to <br />Cornelia School. <br />Install "Local Traffic Only" and reduced speed signs on Cornelia <br />Drive from 1.7. 66th to 11. 72nd Streets, and on 8. 72nd Street from <br />France Avenue to residential streets West of France. <br />and France Ave. and elsewhere as appropriate to protect pedestrian <br />access to Southdale, Yorktown and the new Hennepin County Regional <br />Library. <br />Assure appropriate salting or sanding of the V. 70th Street and Corn- <br />elia Drive intersection. <br />Arrange funding for sidewalks, pedestrian overpasses and other safety <br />needs through sources other than assessing properwomers on the streets <br />affected. <br />Affidavit. of Hailing <br />Nrs. Robert 11. Chizum, 6709 <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. Consider construction of pedestrian overpasses at k1. 70th Street <br />. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Total cost was given by llr. Dunn, estimated at $514,275 <br />one-half of TJ '%hi$" proposed to be paid from State Aid Funds and the balance <br />from Revenue/ P unzs 6f the Village. It was also suggested that the Bicycle <br />Ordinance aould be amended so that, rather than a license of $3.00 for each <br />bicycle as long as it is owned by the same family, an annual license fee P70Uld <br />be established with the proceeds to be applied toward maintenance of the paths. <br />In reply to a question from Mr. 1-7illiarn Howard, 5808 Dewey Hill Road, Mayor Bred- <br />esen recalled that Council had briginally approved the concept of bicycle paths <br />for recreational purposes and that additional areas were added subsequently. <br />pointed out that safety is one of the prime reasons hhe exfepded plan is now <br />being considered. 3fayor Bredesen suggested the possibility of installing only <br />one portion of the recreation area and one portion of the paths which had been <br />recommended because of safety at this time, before proceeding further, to see <br />thE results. Mr. Barry Stivers, 5403 IJooddale Ave., presented a petition <br />objecting to installation of the paths along Wooddale Ave. Mr. Curtis King, . <br />6800 Brook Drive, objected that his notice reached him at a late date and asked <br />that a future hearing be held at a larger meeting place. Ffrs. John R. Schedin, <br />5937 17ooddale Ave., offered to serve on the enlarged committee and said that she <br />believes that it is dangerous to allow bicycles on pedestrian paths. Nr. Marx <br />of Cahill Road said that he had lived in other municipalities that had bicycle <br />paths and that cyclists left litter all along the paths. <br />that residents had not received notices even though the paths were going along <br />their property. Nr. Harold Jastram, 6804 Brook Drive, urged that the path be <br />constructed across the creek from his home, rather than in his back yard. Nr. <br />Robert Ahl, 5409 Wooddale Ave., was told that there is no intent to destroy <br />He <br />Objections were heard <br />trees along the route. An unidentified gentleman in the audience was told by
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.