.. i 16 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
<br />FEBRUARY 7, 1977
<br />EDINA CITY COUNCIL EIETAD AT CITY MTdL
<br />, 7:OO P.M.
<br />hswering rollcall were members Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw and Mayor Van
<br />MINUTES of January 17 and 24, 1977, were approved as submitted by motion of
<br />Councilwoman Schmidt, seconded by Councilman Cotlrtney.
<br />Nays: None
<br />Motion carried.
<br />Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
<br />PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON VARIOUS INPROVEMENTS. The following improvements
<br />having been continued from the meeting of January 17, 1977, action was taken as
<br />hereinafter recorded:
<br />A. WATERHAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P-IJM-322 IN THE FOLLOWING:
<br />Westwood Court from Schaefer Road to Schaefer Road
<br />Schaefer Road from the North line of *Parkwood Knolls Addition to Idylwood La.
<br />Schaefer Road from View Lane to County Road 158
<br />Parkwood Road from Blake Road to Knoll Drive
<br />Idylwood Lane from Blake Road to Schaefer Road
<br />Knoll Drive from Blake Road to Schaefer Road
<br />South Knoll Drive from Blake Road to Knoll Drive
<br />Akers Lane from Parkwood Road to North line of Parkwood Knolls Addition
<br />Schaefer Circle from Schaefer Road to Service Lot 7, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls
<br />Hr. Hyde recalled that, at its meeting of January 17, 1977, the Council had
<br />authorized this improvement with the exception of the Westwood Court portion,
<br />and referred to letters from Dr. E. E. Praley, 6313 Westwood Court, Messzs:.James
<br />Moran, 6312 Westwood Court, Paul D. Hagstrum, 6305 Westwoo& Court, Steyen P.
<br />Ogdahl, 6316 Vestwood Court, and Barron B. Boe, 6320 Westwood Court, all express-
<br />ing opposition to the improvement. Mr. Walter C. Nelson, 6308 Westwood Court had
<br />written in favor of the improvement, Total estimated construction cost was given
<br />at $263,819.46, proposed to be assessed against 94 assessable lots at an estimated
<br />cost of $2,806.59 per lot.
<br />. wood Court and Schaefer Road could connect to the Schaefer Road watermain. No
<br />fxrther discussion being heard, Councilman Shawls mo tiort authorizing Vafermain
<br />Izpovement No. P-WM-322 with the exception of the portidn on Westwood Court was
<br />seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
<br />later in Minutes.)
<br />I Mr. Moran said that residents on the corner of West-
<br />(See Resolution Ordering Improvement
<br />B. WATERMAIN IMPROVENEXT NO. P-IM-324 IN THE FOLLOWING:
<br />Doran Drive from Valley View Road to cul-de-sac
<br />Hr. Dunn recalled that this improvement had been continued from January 17, 1977,
<br />so that the staff-could check on the possibility of assessing a third house on
<br />Doran Drive which is under construction. He explained that at the time he had
<br />authorized the house at5612 Doran Drive to connect to another watermain, he had
<br />no idea that the improvement now under consideration would be coming before
<br />the Council4or hearing, and reiterated his recommendation that the improvement
<br />be authorized as originally proposed, with the total estimated construction cost
<br />of $3,246.40 proposed to be assessed against Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Bach's Addi-
<br />tion, at an estimated cost of $1,623.20 per lot.
<br />heard, Councilman Courtney's motion authorizing the improvement was seconded by
<br />Councilwoman Schmidt and carried.
<br />No further coinments being
<br />(See Resolution Ordering Improvement later iii
<br />C* WATEWIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P-IiM-326 IN THE FOLLOWING:
<br />Easement line from W. 44th St. North thru Lots 1.through 7, Auditor's Sub-
<br />division 176.
<br />Brookside Terrace from Motor Street to I?. 44th Street
<br />Easement line from W. 44th Street North to Lot I, Auditor's Subdivision 176
<br />Hr. Dunn recalled that Watermain Improvement No. P-Wbi-326 and Sanitary Sewer
<br />Improvement No, P-SS-342 both affected the same properties and had been heard
<br />concurrently at the Council meeting on January 17, 1977, at which time they had
<br />been continued to this meeting so that the Engineering Department could try to
<br />develop an alternate route. Mr. Dunn said that he fully appreciated the posi-
<br />tion of affected property owners, but that Lot 6is entitled to have sewer and
<br />water so that it can be developed. Mr. Dunn recommended that the improvements
<br />be constructed to the center of Lot 6 at this time so the vacant lot could be
<br />serviced now and the improvements could be extended at a future time. He pre--
<br />sented total estimated construction cost for the new proposal at $3,304.98 for
<br />the watermain and at $11,486, 16 for the sanitary sewer which costs are proposed
<br />to be assessed against the property getting immediate service (Lot 6 and the
<br />D- SANITARY SEFJER INPROVEMENT NO. P-SS-342 IN THE FOLLOWING: I