Laserfiche WebLink
192 <br />i <br />MIWUTES <br />OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE <br />D EDINA CITY' COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL tf <br />* OCTOBER 1, 1979 ? ' *.f <br />I .I <br />Answering rollcall were members Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt and Mayor <br />Van Valkenburg. Present also were Ifmes. Leslie Turner of the Human Relations <br />Comnission and Helen EfcClelland of the Community Development and Planning Comais- <br />s ion. <br />XINUTES of the Budget Neetings of September 13, 17, 19 and 25, and of the Regular <br />leeting of Septeaber 17, 1979, were approved as submitted by motion of Council- <br />woman Schmidt ,' seconded by Councilman Courtney. <br />c <br />I Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg <br />Nays: Ecne <br />Motion carried. <br />KIICEILI ADDITION PRELIMINUY PLAT CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 16, 197 9. Affidavits of <br />Xotice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. <br />Mr. Hughes presented Kiichli Addition for preliminary plat approval, advising <br />that the proponent is requesting approval of two 76 foot by 180 foot single <br />fzrnily iots for property generally located North of W. 62nd Street and West of <br />Tracy Ave. <br />whereby the Easterly 32 feet oE Lot 1 and Lbt 2, Block '1, Countryside Addition, <br />vas approvsd and now constitutes the subject property. <br />in 1970 the proponent requested an Zdentical subdivision to that now ,.proposed and <br />that the Planning Commission had recomended approval before it had been dis- <br />covered that deed restrictions had been imposed which stated that only one house <br />could be built on each Countryside Addition lot. <br />Council had tzbled the subdivision until expiration' of the deed restrictions but <br />~ * advised that these restrictions have now expired. Mr. Hughes said that the sub- <br />~ ject property represents a transition between lots to ths West with 75 foot front- <br />, .ages and lots to the East with frontages of approximately 120 feet and said that <br />the proposed lots would approximate the size of lots to the Vest. <br />that if the proposed subdivision is not approved, the alternative would +be a lot <br />measuring 152 feet by 180 feet and P70uld be larger (especially in width) than <br />other Lets in the area. The Hayor referred to a petition siped by omers of <br />tvaqty-three 2rope.rti~s +ich petit ion stated that sjgners had no objection eo <br />;the issuasce of a Building Permit for constructiozl of a home on the East 76 feet <br />of Lot 2, Block 1, 'Countiyside Addition. Mr. Charles Davis, 5700 Olinger Road, <br />asked that the hearing could be continued so that he could study the proposal <br />further. He safd that be does not object to one house on the property but is <br />concerned about two houses being built. Nr. Kiichli, the proponent, said tha? <br />he would hzve no strong objection if the heariilg is continued but that he would <br />like to get the matter settled. No further discussion being heard, Councilmn <br />Richards' motioa was seconded by CocncSwoman Sc!lmicit, contkuing the hearing <br />mtil October 15, l.979. <br />Nr. Hughes recalled. that in 1968 the Council had approved' a division <br />Fie recalled further that <br />He recalled that in 1970; the <br />He explained <br />I <br />Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg <br />' Nays :-' Eone <br />Notion carried. !*. <br />KLODT'S ADbITION TO EDINA ZONIZJG AruP FINAL PLAT COMlINUED TO OCTOBER 15, 1979. <br />Mr. Hughes presented Ordinance Nn. 811~2~130 for Second Beadkg and Klodt 's,'Acldi- <br />tion to Edina+fi'or final plat approval, recalling that tliis property is located <br />South of IC- 75th St, md East of York Av2. and that the propcrrent is ded'icatkg <br />a 50 foot ope7 spz& easeasnt to the City and that a berm a-d landscaping'will be . <br />prokicied to screen the parking lot froiil the residential area to the East. Comcil- <br />man Richards' motion for approval or' the plat and of 0~1 Office District zoning <br />was secondez by Councilman Courtney. Comcilnan %chards said that he believed <br />that, in zdditiozl to the 50 foot easemsnt, the developer should make a subdiv'i- <br />sion dedication of $3G,OOO to the CLty. <br />to the cash dedication, saying that he has already given up 15..47% of his land <br />for the 50 foot easement. <br />the new plat %?as to clarify the legal description and was not required by <br />ordiaance. <br />had bee3 assessed.against his property and referred to other property foy xhich <br />he had also been assessed. <br />of the plat and zoning was wirhdrawn. <br />the hearing be zontiilued until October 15, 1979, so that tke staff would have an <br />opportunity to check the assessment roles regarding Xr. K3.odt's statement that <br />he had already Seen heavily' assessed. Notion seconded by Councilman Courtney. <br />Mr. Paul RloZt, the developer, objectsd <br />Mr. Hughes concurred with Mr. Uodt's statemenf,that <br />Xr. Klodt also contended that the entire cost of street impr,puenents <br />Pollowing some discussion, the motion for approval <br />Councilvoiuaii Schmidt then moved 'that <br />Ayes : Srebesm, Courtney , Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkmburg \--- ley~: None <br />Xot ion carried. <br />r ..