1888-1989 Archive Minutes
Minutes 1975 - 1989
12/24/2013 8:09:20 AM
12/23/2013 11:51:02 AM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
45 <br />EIINUTES <br />OF THE REcIlJLAlt NEETING OF THE <br />EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL <br />JANUARY 19, 1951 <br />Answering rollcall were members Bredesen, Richards , Schmi-dt , Turner and Mayor <br />Courtney <br />MINUTES of October 20, November 10, 13 and 17, December 15, 1980 and January 5, <br />1981, were approved as submtited by motion oE. Councilman Bredesen, seconded by <br />Councilwoman Turner. <br />Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried. <br />kL JOKNSON CONSTRUCTION COPfPAKf ZONING REQUEST CONTINUED. As recommended by Mr . <br />Rosland, Councilman Bredesen's motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt, <br />continuing the 0-1 Office District zoning request of A1 Johnson Construction <br />Company and Second Reading oE Ordinance No. 811-A142 until February 23, 1981. <br />I <br />Ayes : Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner Courtney <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried. a <br />rn 3 <br />0 SENTINEL "JAGEMENT COMPANY 0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT ZONING GRANTED FIRST READING. <br />Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered <br />placed on file. <br />Industrial District to 0-2 Office District for property generally located West <br />of the Radisson South Hotel and South of Edina Industrial Blvd. Mr. Hughes <br />advised Council that Sentinel Management Co. is requesting the rezoning in <br />order to construct a six story office building <br />area of 62,790 square feet, and advised that all ordinance requirements would <br />be met and that he believes that the six story building would be more compatible <br />with the surrounding development than the. three story building permitted by the <br />Planned Industrial District zoning. It was pointed out that the driveway ent- <br />rance to the Radisson South parking lot abuts the Northerly boundary of the sub- <br />ject property and, in order to eliminate potentially serious traffic conflicts, <br />Mr. Hughes recommended that the proponent 1) combine the driveway for the sub- <br />ject property with the driveway for the existing bcilding to the West (which <br />is also owned by the proponent) or 2) obtain an easement from the Radisson <br />South to allow access to their driveway. Mr. Ronald Erickson, representing the <br />proponent, shoyed a colored rendering of the building, and advised that the site <br />is a good location for the luxury office building which they propose. Council- <br />man Bredesen thereupon offered Ordinance No. 811-A144 for First Reading, sub- <br />ject to the condition that Lhe access problem be resolved to the satisfaction <br />of the staff, and further to the condition that landscape plans be submitted at <br />Second Reading. Said Ordinance No. 811-A144 reading as follows : <br />Mr. Hughes presented the request for zoning change from Planned <br />with an anticipated gross floor <br />ORDINANCE NO. 81 1-A144 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 811) <br />BY ADDING TO THE OFFICE DISTRICT 0-2 <br />Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is <br />amended by adding the following thereto : <br />addition of the following property: <br />"The extent of the Office District (Sub-District 0-2) is enlarged by the <br />Lot 2, Block 1, Replat of Edina Interchange Center, according to Plat <br />therefore on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in <br />and for Hennepin County (which is in Sub-District 0-2)". <br />Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption <br />and publication. <br />WHITE OAKS TOWNHOUSE ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. <br />Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered <br />placed on file. <br />R-2 Residential District about three years ago and that, subsequently, *two two- <br />family dwellings have been constructed on the property. He advised that the <br />proponents now wish to sell each unit individually and are requesting a sub- <br />division of the property in order to avoid Lots 2 and 3 from being land-locked, <br />and explained that Outlot A is the location of the driveway access to all four <br />units and would be ownec! and maintained jointIy by the obmers of the four units. <br />Mr . Huglics said that the staff .and Community Development and Planning Commis- <br />sion have recommended approval, and that the staff also recommends that no sub- <br />division dedication be required since no new intensity is required by the <br />subdivision. Discussion ensued as to whether a subdivision fee should be <br />required. City Attorney Ericlcson suggested that townhouses such as these should <br />be platted and that would take care of future cases where a subdivision fee is <br />not required. <br />Mr. Hughes recalled that the subject property was rezoned to <br />He said that he would try to tie this type of situation l.nto the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.