Laserfiche WebLink
45 <br />EIINUTES <br />OF THE REcIlJLAlt NEETING OF THE <br />EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL <br />JANUARY 19, 1951 <br />Answering rollcall were members Bredesen, Richards , Schmi-dt , Turner and Mayor <br />Courtney <br />MINUTES of October 20, November 10, 13 and 17, December 15, 1980 and January 5, <br />1981, were approved as submtited by motion oE. Councilman Bredesen, seconded by <br />Councilwoman Turner. <br />Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried. <br />kL JOKNSON CONSTRUCTION COPfPAKf ZONING REQUEST CONTINUED. As recommended by Mr . <br />Rosland, Councilman Bredesen's motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt, <br />continuing the 0-1 Office District zoning request of A1 Johnson Construction <br />Company and Second Reading oE Ordinance No. 811-A142 until February 23, 1981. <br />I <br />Ayes : Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner Courtney <br />Nays: None <br />Motion carried. a <br />rn 3 <br />0 SENTINEL "JAGEMENT COMPANY 0-2 OFFICE DISTRICT ZONING GRANTED FIRST READING. <br />Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered <br />placed on file. <br />Industrial District to 0-2 Office District for property generally located West <br />of the Radisson South Hotel and South of Edina Industrial Blvd. Mr. Hughes <br />advised Council that Sentinel Management Co. is requesting the rezoning in <br />order to construct a six story office building <br />area of 62,790 square feet, and advised that all ordinance requirements would <br />be met and that he believes that the six story building would be more compatible <br />with the surrounding development than the. three story building permitted by the <br />Planned Industrial District zoning. It was pointed out that the driveway ent- <br />rance to the Radisson South parking lot abuts the Northerly boundary of the sub- <br />ject property and, in order to eliminate potentially serious traffic conflicts, <br />Mr. Hughes recommended that the proponent 1) combine the driveway for the sub- <br />ject property with the driveway for the existing bcilding to the West (which <br />is also owned by the proponent) or 2) obtain an easement from the Radisson <br />South to allow access to their driveway. Mr. Ronald Erickson, representing the <br />proponent, shoyed a colored rendering of the building, and advised that the site <br />is a good location for the luxury office building which they propose. Council- <br />man Bredesen thereupon offered Ordinance No. 811-A144 for First Reading, sub- <br />ject to the condition that Lhe access problem be resolved to the satisfaction <br />of the staff, and further to the condition that landscape plans be submitted at <br />Second Reading. Said Ordinance No. 811-A144 reading as follows : <br />Mr. Hughes presented the request for zoning change from Planned <br />with an anticipated gross floor <br />ORDINANCE NO. 81 1-A144 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 811) <br />BY ADDING TO THE OFFICE DISTRICT 0-2 <br />Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is <br />amended by adding the following thereto : <br />addition of the following property: <br />"The extent of the Office District (Sub-District 0-2) is enlarged by the <br />Lot 2, Block 1, Replat of Edina Interchange Center, according to Plat <br />therefore on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in <br />and for Hennepin County (which is in Sub-District 0-2)". <br />Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption <br />and publication. <br />WHITE OAKS TOWNHOUSE ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. <br />Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered <br />placed on file. <br />R-2 Residential District about three years ago and that, subsequently, *two two- <br />family dwellings have been constructed on the property. He advised that the <br />proponents now wish to sell each unit individually and are requesting a sub- <br />division of the property in order to avoid Lots 2 and 3 from being land-locked, <br />and explained that Outlot A is the location of the driveway access to all four <br />units and would be ownec! and maintained jointIy by the obmers of the four units. <br />Mr . Huglics said that the staff .and Community Development and Planning Commis- <br />sion have recommended approval, and that the staff also recommends that no sub- <br />division dedication be required since no new intensity is required by the <br />subdivision. Discussion ensued as to whether a subdivision fee should be <br />required. City Attorney Ericlcson suggested that townhouses such as these should <br />be platted and that would take care of future cases where a subdivision fee is <br />not required. <br />Mr. Hughes recalled that the subject property was rezoned to <br />He said that he would try to tie this type of situation l.nto the