Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-01-21_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL , III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following' the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of January 7, 2014 and Work Session of January 7, 2014 B. Receive Payment of Claims as per: Pre -List Dated, 1/9/2014 TOTAL $1,824,721.24 and per Pre -List Dated, 1/ 16/2014 TOTAL $867,668.87 C. Resolution No. 2014 -13 Requesting Variance From Standards For State Aid Operation For West 54th Street From Minnehaha Boulevard To France Avenue D. Resolution No. 2014 -14 Authorizing Cooperative Local Bike and Pedestrian Connection Agreement With Three Rivers Park District E. Traffic Safety Report, December 4, 2013 F. Approve Change Order — Contract For Engineering Services For Edina Bike Boulevard Project G. Resolution No. 2014- 15 Approving Grant With Minnesota Bureau Of Criminal Apprehension, Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force For 2013 -2014 H. Resolution No. 2014 -16 Authorizing An Application To The MN DEED For A Grant To Support Redevelopment Of The Pentagon Park Property 1. Resolution No. 2014 -17 Receiving Feasibility Report & Setting Public Hearing For Improvements 50th & France Parking Ramps and Related Streetscape, Improvement No. P -23 J. Authorize Engineering'Services For Design Of 50th & France Parking Ramps Improvements K. Request For Purchase — Contract #13 -7PK, Site Planning, Landscape Architecture And Civil Engineering, Pamela Park Renovation Project, Anderson - Johnson Associates L. Request For Purchase — Contract # 13 -8PK, Architectural Services, Pamela Park Shelter Building, Pamela Park Renovation Project, Wendel Companies M. Request For Purchase — Contract, Construction Management Services, Pamela Park Renovation Project, RJM Construction Agenda/Edina City Council . January 21, 2014 Page 2 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District VI. During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic; you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is. relevant to the discussion. To ensure.fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING —Temporary Intoxicating On -Sale Liquor License, Church of St. Patrick, 6820 St. Patrick. Lane, February 15, 2014 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment" the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the some issue in the interest of time and topic Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Approve Joint Goals With Independent School District 273 Edina Public Schools B. Approve Edina Rotary Foundation Donation Of Heirloom Clock For Centennial Lakes Park C. Resolution No. 2014-11 Accepting Various Donations D. Sketch Plan — 3210 Southdale Circle (Taco Bell) E. Southdale Medical Building, 6525 France Avenue —Amend Conditions of Approval To Build The Proof -of- Parking Plan IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Energy & Environment Commission, December 12, 2013, 2. Heritage Preservation Board, December 9, 2013 Tues Tues Mon Mon Thur Mon Mon Wed Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon es ,yes Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council January 21, 2014 Page 3 3. Park Board, November 12, 2013 4. Planning Commission, December 11, 2013 5. Arts & Culture Commission, October 24, 2013 6. Human Rights & Relations Commission, October 22, 2013 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Jan 21 Work Session — Edina Vision 20/20 Planning and 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Grandview Advisory Team 5:30 P.M. Jan 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 3 Work Session — Residential Redevelopment Update 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Pentagon Park TIF District Proposal Feb 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 6 Board and Commission Interviews 5:30 — 7:30 P.M. MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM Feb 10 Board and Commission Interviews 5:30 — 7:30 P.M. MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM Feb 17 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Feb 19 Board and Commission Interviews 5:30 — 7:30 P.M. MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM Feb 18 Work Session — Naming & Donation Policy /Park Board Jnt Sess. 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Feb 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mar 4 Work Session —Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regional Trail Update Mar 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mar 17 Board and Commissions Annual Dinner Meeting 5:00 P.M. HUGHES PAVILLION CENTENNAL LAKES Mar 18 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mar 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Apr 1 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Apr 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Apr 22 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Apr 22 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 7, 2014 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Il. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular, work session, and closed meeting minutes of December 17, 2013, and special meeting minutes of December 10, 2013. IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 19, 2013, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $646,458.45; Police Special Revenue $4,182.25; PI Debt Service Fund $13,654.98; Working Capital Fund $45,837.57; Equipment Replacement Fund $14,600.92; Art Center Fund $2,963.38; Golf Dome Fund $355,401.95; Aquatic Center Fund $145.35; Golf Course Fund $10,367.33; Ice Arena Fund $38,277.52; Edinborough Park Fund $3,922.47; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,412.52; Liquor Fund $209,713.82; Utility Fund $444,597.68; Storm Sewer Fund $29,834.23; Recycling Fund $34,192.80; PSTF Agency Fund $885.75;_ TOTAL $1,858,448.97. and for receipt of payment of claims dated December 26, 2013, and consisting of 28.pages; General Fund $100,535.33; Police Special Revenue $688.06; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $10,573.79; Working Capital Fund $29,859.70; Equipment, Replacement Fund $6,112.18; Art Center Fund $7,056.51; Golf Dome Fund $1,114.99; Aquatic Center Fund $115.64; Golf Course Fund $1,542.00; Ice Arena Fund $7,947.41; Sports Dome r Fund $9,146.00; Edinborough Park Fund $5,224.47; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $7,807.67; Liquor Fund $261,881.88; Utility Fund $61,717.87; Storm Sewer Fund $10.077.50; PSTF Agency Fund $2,042.91; Centennial TIF District $5,435.50; Southdale 2 District $474.00; TOTAL $529,353.41; for receipt of payment of claims dated January 2, 2014, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $385,339.65; CDBG Fund $108,222.00; Working Capital Fund $5,255.69; Equipment Replacement Fund $2,510.40; Art Center Fund $1,783.93; Golf Dome Fund $7,854.22; Golf Course Fund $17,369.66; Ice Arena Fund $22,753.97; Edinborough Park Fund $15,167.69; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,932.35; Liquor Fund $217,004.43; Utility Fund $149,899.54;. Storm Sewer Fund $6,685.00; PSTF Agency Fund $5,550.20; Payroll Fund $5,957.80; TOTAL $953,286.53; and; Credit Card Transactions dated October 26 — November 25, 2013; TOTAL $26,367.19 IV.C. Authorize Engineering Services for West 54th Street — Bid Documents and Construction Phase Services IV.D. Approve Re- appointment of Mayor Pro Tern IV.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -01, Designating.Official Newspaper For 2014 IV.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -02, Signatory' Resolution IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -03, Designation of Director /Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 7, 2014 '1 W.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 704, Designation of Director /Alternate Director of LOGIS IV.I: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 705, Authorizing. Facsimile Signatures IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -06, Designating Official Depositories IV.K. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -07, Appointment; to Edina Fire Relief Board IV.L. Set 2014 Date for Board of Appeal & Equalization on Monday, April 21, 2014 W.M. Approve Annual Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector W.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -12 Approving Edina Precincts 17 & 18 Boundary Changes IV.O. Award of Bid — Contract No. ENG13 -5 France Avenue Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended.low bidder; Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. at $3,033,892.33 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. MIKE FREEMAN, HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman stated his appreciation for Police Chief Long and the City's first rate Police Department. He reported on trends.in criminal activity, noting that from 2006 to 2012, violent crime in Edina dropped 65 %, with property crime down 15 %. The Council thanked Mr. Freeman for his work on behalf of Edina. Vl. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-.09 ADOPTED — SUPPORTING THE MOVE MN CAMPAIGN Mayor Hovland noted the Resolution had been modified to. mess emphasize equitable funding and sustainable solutions. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of revised Resolution No. 2014 -09, for support of the Move MN Campaign., Member Bennett seconded the motion.. i. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VILB. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-08 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all.donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of ;Resolution No. 2014 -08 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. REAPPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES —APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by. Member Bennett, approving the following reappointments with terms expiring on February 1, 2017: Art and Culture Commission: Barbara LaValleur, Thomas Rauechle; Board of Appeal & Equalization: Ron Anderson, Michael Friedberg, Jeff Johnson; Construction Board of Appeals: Kip Peterson; Community Health Commission: Melina Bothun- Hurley, Alison Pence; Park IB oar d: David Deeds; Planning Commission: Ken Potts; and, Transportation Commission: Katherine Bass, Emily Boettge, Jennifer Janovy. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 4. Minutes /Edina City Council /January 7, 2614 VII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -10 ADOPTED — RESCINDING ACQUISITION AUTHORITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3944 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET The Council . discussed the resolution language and asked questions of .Attorney Knutson. Council consensus was reached to revise the resolution as follows: Page 2, third WHEREAS, to indicate:. "...because it has been represented to the City that the owners prefer to pursue this alternative instead of continuing negotiations with the City because the acquisition price negotiated for this alternative transaction exceeds the purchase price offered by the City to construct a public parking expansion, and;" Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -10, Rescinding Acquisition Authority for Property Located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street, as revised above. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,'Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.E. SKETCH PLAN FOR PENTAGON PARK — REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the sketch plan proposal and two options to redevelop Pentagon Park along 77th. Street, noting the total site was 43 acres in size and expected to redevelop over the next two to fifteen years. There would be mixed uses including office, retail, and a multi- storied hotel with housing remaining as a potential. Mr. Teague advised that an eight -story hotel was approved but not constructed so that approval had expired. He answered questions of the Council relating to the building height under PUD regulations. Proponent Presentation Scott Takenoff, Development Manager of Hillcrest Partners, presented the pending Pentagon Park PUD application, noting .Hillcrest Partners would assure ample security for the City to meet all mutual expectations. He stated as part of the first PUD step, Hillcrest Partners would agree with: a higher percentage of green space than required; the majority of stormwater management being a public amenity; encouraging stormwater treatment /management at a higher standard than Code required; encouraging bicycle and pedestrian traffic; upgrading a minimum of two transit shelters; upgrading 77th Street; creating a design consistent with LEED standards; use of solar on the buildings north of 77th Street; upgrading pedestrian infrastructure; and, upgrading of Parklawn. Mr. Takenoff indicated Hillcrest Partners does not yet know the hotel height.but it might be above 12 stories and require a Comprehensive Plan change. He stated Hillcrest Partners was working with Ehlers and staff on the option of Tax Increment Financing, which would be presented to the Council on February!18, 2014.4,2 --3. Tom Whitlock, President of Damon Farber Associates, and Bob Close of Bob Close Studio, presented a slide show and described elements of the two project options. The Council discussed the sketch plans, asked questions of the proponents and Mr. Teague, and made the following suggestions for consideration of a well- crafted PUD: developing a hybrid plan (such as using the west section of Option 2 with the east: section of Option 1 to assure connectivity) that included a creative trail alignment and shape of water amenity; keeping building height to the Comprehensive Plan limit and not exceed 12- stories in the southerly section; locating buildings closer to the street; integration of step - down podium height throughout the project and especially towards the neighborhood to the north side; eleven -foot street widths with narrower side streets to allow wider sidewalks /enhanced pedestrian environment and green spaces; restaurant use open64 into evening hours; embracing the park and inclusion of elements to welcome foot and bicycle traffic; providing additional plan specificity; shadow studies; and, retaining a residential housing element. The Council acknowledged the enhancements beyond Code requirements offered by the proponent in consideration of making a PUD request. Mr. Takenoff thanked the Council for its comments and indicated 2014 would be a year of planning to add specificity with 2015 being 'a year of construction. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 7, 2014 , VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES: 1. EMERGENCY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 14, 2013 2. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 21, 2013 3. VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE, NOVEMBER 22, 2013 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE— Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS —Received Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS— Received XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved-by Edina City Council, January 21, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 7, 2014, meeting available. Page 4 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 7, 2014 5:35 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering.roll call were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and'Mayor Hovland. Edina's legislative delegation; Senator Melissa Franzen, Representative Ron Erhardt and Representative Paul Rosenthal attended the meeting. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Director; Annie Coyle, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Peliee Ch?: {; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Interim City Engineer; and Scott Neal, City Manager. Also attending were Erin Campbell and Tom Poul, Messerli & Kramer, on behalf of the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC). 2014 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM Tom Poul and Erin Campbell reviewed the 2014 MLC Legislative Program which consists of three main themes: 1) promote accountability and transparency in the State /local fiscal relationship; 2) invest in job retention and growth;, and 3) support local government policies that promote fairness and equity. The Council and legislators discussed the various areas furthering this program might impact including: changes to the property tax system, changes to DEED's tools and incentive for attracting and retaining business, supporting flexibility in Tax .Increment Financing (TIF) policies, opposing unfunded mandates and the possibility of supporting street improvement districts. It was noted that the 2014 session would not begin until February ;25th 1 and has been dubbed the "Unsession" by Gov. Dayton. AREAS OF INTEREST SPECIFIC TO EDINA Manager Neal introduced for discussion with the legislators and City Council the following areas of interest to Edina: 1) potential special legislation allowing the renewal of the Southdale TIF District; 2) legislation that could impact municipal liquor operations; 3) clarifying legislation regarding municipal sales tax exemption; and 4) aviation noise, the perceived increase in levels and subsequent impact on property values. The City Council and legislators had discussion about possible legislation and how the City could assist in forwarding their positions on the areas of interest. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 21, 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor .R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 378851 1/9/2014 101833 A.T.O.M. 200.00 2014 MEMBERSHIP 200.00 378852 1/912014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 332937 010114 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 117/2014 10:38:41 Page- 1 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5515 59.60 YORK SELLING 332523 1745870 VERNON SELLING 28.40 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 332524 1745871 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 62.80 4105.6406 332732 1751775 4105.6406 100.40 PUBLIC ART 332733 1751751 A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 251.20 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 1470.6201 378853 1/9/2014 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 133471 ADVANTAGE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC. LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 241.37 BRONZE PLAQUE 00009310 332871 00021431 LAUNDRY 241.37 BRONZE PLAQUE 332872 00021433 5821.6201 482.74 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 378864 119/2014 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 4,288.32 BIKE BLVD DESIGN 332784 54616 4,288.32 378855 1/912014 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 401.64 332670 123113 480.17 332670 123113 161.86 332670 123113 75.88 332670 123113 148.22 332670 123113 177.16 332670 123113 68.61 332670 123113 1,513.54 378866 1/9/2014 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 1,062.25 COPIER PAPER 332785 10384467 -00 1,062.25 378857 1/912014 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 559.39 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332873 2046952 559.39 378858 11912014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 9,958.00 IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLATIOM0604036 332874 63692 9,958.00 117/2014 10:38:41 Page- 1 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. PUBLIC ART 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 47089.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ALDEN PARK IRRIGATION R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 117/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register and Summary 1/912014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378858 1/912014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING Continued... 378859 119/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 272.70 COFFEE 332671 1104145 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 98.21 COFFEE 332875 1104149 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 370.91 378860 1/912014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 144.00 332525 37034 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,046.00 332734 37666 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 30.80 332735 37669 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 501.00 332736 37668 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,654.00 332737 37667 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 140.00 332738 37670 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,515.80 378861 119/2014 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 26.31 IPAD DATA SERVICE 332786 287240706569X12 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS- 1713 26.31 37.8862 1/9/2014 102660 AUDUBON INTERNATIONAL 200.00 MEMBERSHIP 332938 GC5390 -2014 5431.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 200.00 378863 1/912014 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 65.79 FRONTALIGNMENT 332787 69732 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.79 378864 119/2014 119206 AZTECA SYSTEMS INC. 12,000.00 CITYWORKS ANNUAL CONTRACT 00001356 332939 8923 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 12,000.00 CITYWORKS ANNUAL CONTRACT 00001356 332939 8923 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 12,000.00 CITYWORKS ANNUAL CONTRACT 00001356 332939 8923 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 36, 000.00 378865 11912014 123479 BAKER, ZACHERY 71.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332876 123113 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 71.70 378866 1/9/2014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 9,307.94 BIDS AND SPECS, ENVIRO TESTING 332993 23271292.04 -2 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1f712014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378866 11912014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO Continued... 9,307.94 378667 11912014 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 119.60 BATTERIES 00003018 332940 018- 325926 1400.6406 SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 119.60 (GENERAL I 378868 119/2014 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 647.02 SKATES 00002071 332877 00097055 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 513.00 LEXAN SHEETS 332878 00097119 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 1,160.02 378869 1/912014 129549 BEHLEN, NATE 160.87 UNIFORM PURCHASE 332941 010214 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION - 160.87 378870 119/2014 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 199.05 332526 41231000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 659.75 332527 41230800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 91.00 332528 41242400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19.15- 332529 89492800 5842.5515 iCOST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 451.11 332530 89484000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7.60 332531 89573000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 245.89 332532 89572600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 206.49 332533 89528400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 82.00 332739 41230900 5862.5515 (COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 460.09 332740 89569700. 5862.5515 (COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,383.83 378871 1/9/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 144.00 PIZZA 332879 D28IN1565 5520.5510 !COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 288.00 PIZZA 332942 D28IN1586 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 432.00 378872 119/2014 108670 BERNER, JIM 175.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/06/14 332943 010114 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 175.00 378873 _ 1/912014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 283.80 COFFEE 332880 1142487 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 624.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332944 1143052 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL - Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 119/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 378873 119/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 907.80 378674 1/9/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 97.28 STORAGE BOXES 332881 WO- 895624 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 121.19 HEATER 332882 OE- 341123 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 332883 WO- 900374 -1 1550.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.58 PENS 332884 WO- 899876 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.02 REPORT COVERS 332885 WO- 896952 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 414.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 332886 WO- 897371 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.04 LASER PRINTER LABELS 332887 WO- 896831 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.15 CALENDARS 332888 WO- 901397 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 785.71 378875 11912014 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 246.72 FIRE SAFE 332945 610314 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 246.72 378876 1/912014 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 169.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 332946 010214 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 169.96 378877 11912014 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 312.57 BALLASTS 332788 906707934 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 312.57 378878 1/912014 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,357.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003718 332789 81288526 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1,357.50 378879 1/9/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 941.70 FRONT GRILLE 332790 810812 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 506.31 GAS PEDAL ASSEMBLIES 332791 810689 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 147.36 CLAMPS 00005874 332792 811659 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 647.54 MUFFLER 00005871 332793 811287 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,242.91 378860 11912014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Page- 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 364.00 WATER TESTING 00001379 332794 1305394 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 364.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 -- 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378881 1/912014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. Continued... 102.57 OCE MAINTENANCE 332795 988134471 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 102.57 378882 119/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 936.50 332534 412112 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 54.55 332535 412113 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,285.05 332536 411259 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 104.30 332537 411260 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.00 332538 410095 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 742.00 332539 410094 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,140.40 378883 1/9/2014 100677 CARGILL INC; 17,567.65 ROCK SALT 332796 2901381335 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 11,441.71 00005070 332797 2901420833 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,456.21 332798 2901469086 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 30,465.57 378884 1/912014 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 1,200.00 HOME ENERGY SQUAD VISITS 332799 11929 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 1,200.00 378885 119/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 74.44 10089900 -4 332672 10089900 -12/13 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6,027.25 5591458 -4 332673 5591458 -12/13 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 2,961.97 5546504 -1 332674 5546504- 12113- 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 36.93 9546705 -6 332800 9546705 -12/13 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 9,100.59 378886 1/9/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 58.49 952 920 -1586 332675 1586 -12/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 66.47 952 922 -2444 332676 2444 -12/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 123.51 952 831 -0024 332601 0024.12/13 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.21 952 920 -8632 332802 8632 -12/13 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 57.03 952 929 -0297 332889 0297 -12/13 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 337.28 952 927 -8861 332890 8861 -12/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 41.47 952 922 -9246 332891 9246 -12/13 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 741.46 378887 1/912014 132078 CHRISTOPHER, KATE R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 378887 11912014 132078 CHRISTOPHER, KATE Continued... 385.00 SCULPTURE VANDALISM REPAIRS 332892 123113 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 385.00 378888 1/912014 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 220.00 FACEBOOK ADVERTISING 332893 COM -0140 5510.6575 PRINTING 450.00 ABOUT TOWN AD 332947 COM -0177 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 450.00 GOLF DOME AD 332948 COM -0178 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,120.00 378889 1/9/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 79.80 00110793- 0173001001 332677 173001001 -12/13 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER 51.20 00110793 - 0173001000 332678 173001000 -12113 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER 106.20 00110793 - 0155250018 332679 155250018 -12/13 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 51.20 00110793 - 0155250009 332680 155250009 -12/13 5422.6189' SEWER & WATER 3,603.17 - 00110793- 0155200000 332681 155200000 -12113 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 544.27 00103650 - 0155251008 332682 155251008 -12113 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 342.66 00079303 - 0155300018 332683 155300018 -12/13 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 133.87 00079303- 0155300009 332684 155300009 -12/13 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 2,229.83 00079303 - 0155300010 332685 155300010 -12/13 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 342.66 00113667 - 0120835016 332686 120835016 -12/13 5111.6.189 SEWER & WATER 85.04 00102561 = 0112920000 332687 0112920000 -1211 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER 3 220.93 00113607- 0170005201 332803 170005201 -12/13 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER 7,790.83 378890 11912014 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 1,104.32 FLOODLIGHTS, SAW BLADES 00003726 332804 153381 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,104.32 378891 1/9/2014 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 450.00 COCOA 332894 0747682 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 450.00 378892 119/2014 120433 COMCAST 68.88 8772 10 614 0177449 332949 177449 -12/13 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 68.88 378893 1/912014 101832 CORNERHOUSE 2,654.96 FORENSIC INTERVIEW SERVICES 332950 2014 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,654.96 117/2014 10:38:41 Page- 6 Business Unit PUBLIC ART ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT YORK OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CLUB HOUSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 — 1/912014 Check # Date ' Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378893 11912014 101832 CORNERHOUSE Continued... 378894 11912014 133173 CRABTREE COMPANIES INC. 5,215.00 LASERFICHE LICENSE 332951 121369 1511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT 5,215.00 378895 11912014 133464 CRAWFORD, MYRRHENE. 22.26 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 332688 123113 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.26 378896 1/912014 125059 CREATIVE COMMUNICATION SERVICES 590.00 ON HOLD MESSAGING SYSTEM 332952 4283 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 590.00 378897 119/2014 104020 DALCO 1,982.68 ICE MELT 00001453 332805 2693690 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,982.68 378898 11912014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 337.95 332540 732671 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 984.85 332541 000180 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 332541 000180 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,585.95 332741 000178 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 142.00 332742 000179 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 66.30 332743 000182 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,797.35 332744 000181 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,944.40 378899 11912014 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 643.65 RUBBER FOR RANGE 332806 13 -03 -04 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 375.00 RUBBER FOR RANGE 332807 13 -03 -05 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 1,018.65 378900 1/9/2014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 3,984.40 STD JAN 2014 332953 F018342-1 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,984.40 378901 1/9/2014 127045 DEHNEL, JOHN 65.54 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332895 123113 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 65.54 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register and Summary 1/912014 - 119/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378902 11912014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 268.22 EXTRACTOR SET 00005869 332808 862240 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.20 REMOVAL TOOL 00005869 332809 862484 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 306.42 378903 1/9/2014 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 89.83 BAKERY 332810 474133 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 89.83 378904 119/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 89.00 650243624 332896 650243624 -12/13 5761.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,455.21 110311893 332897 110311893 -12/13 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,544.21 378905 11912014 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 3,281.86 REFUSE 332994 DT0000672367 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,635.72 REFUSE 332995 DT0000672366 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 6,917.58 378906 11912014 124358 DILL, SARAH 27.30 ART WORK SOLD 331065 120913 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.30 378907 1/9/2014 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND - 5813 FAIRFAX 332811 ED121227 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 378908 11912014 129718„ DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 432.00 CARAMEL CORN 332898 1664 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 648.00 CARAMEL CORN 332899 1686 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,080.00 378909 119/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 196.67 EDINA LIQUORS AD 332689 59175 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 196.67 EDINA LIQUORS AD 332689 59175 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 196.66 EDINA LIQUORS AD 332689 59175 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 590.00 378910 119/2014 122387 ECOLAB - 644.27 CLEANERS 00003730 332812 3787489 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 644.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date . Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 378910 1/912014 122387 ECOLAB Continued... 378911 119/2014 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 1,053.96 TAPE, MARKER DISPENSERS 00001445 332813 10560100 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.79 STRAPES 00001420 332900 10533500 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,060.75 378912 1/9/2014 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 20.00 CHAMBER MEETING - K. MARTIN 332954 33991 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 20.00 378913 11912014 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 94.66 MANAGEMENT FEE 332901 123113 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES 94.66 378914 1/912014 .. 133465 ESTATE OF MURIEL JOHNSON 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 332690 123013 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 100.00 378915 119/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 112.60 OIL 332814 69- 123425 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 105.58 BATTERY 332815 69- 123619 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 40.30 CAMSHAFT SENSOR 332816 69- 123773 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 258.48 378916 1/9/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 381.81 METER HEADS 00001375 332691 0064407 -1 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 9,321.51 WATER METER INSTALLATIONS 332817 0065322 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,703.32 378917 11912014 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC. 88.87 WINDOW PUNCHES 00003729 332818 8166 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 88.87 378918 119/2014 101475 FOOTJOY 10/2014 10:38:41 Page- 9 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN METER REPAIR DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 174.34 SHOES 332902 5327950 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 174.34 378919 119/2014 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 148.03 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332819 122713 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 148.03 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 117/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 — 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378919 119/2014 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA Continued... 378920 119/2014 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 50.91 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332903 123113 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 50.91 378921 1/912014 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 636.00 RINK ATTENDANT ATTIRE 332820 86204 1622.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY 636.00 378922 119/2014 116190 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,582.80 METALAMMO CAGES 332955 106374901 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 1,582.80 378923 119/2014 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 57.59 R -91 PHONE 332821 5270963 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.59 378924 1/912014 100025 GOLDEN SHOE STABLES INC. 800.00 SLEIGH RIDES FOR FESTIVAL 332956 1/12/2014 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 800.00 378925 119/2014 102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 380.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 332957 MAY 18 -21 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 380.00 378926 11912014 101103 GRAINGER 266.55 GLOVES 00005779. 332822 9324624247 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.91 DRILL 00001444 332823 9325780303 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 389.46 378927 1/9/2014 120201 GRANICUS INC. 4,674.60 WEBSTREAMING 332958 51198 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 4,674.60 378928 1/912014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 252.50 332542 161514 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 540.00 332543 161469 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,093.50 332544 161288 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,886.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 -- 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378929 1/912014 100785 GREUPNER, JOE Continued... 4,380.00 GIFT CERTIFICATE LESSONS 332904 123113 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 3,841.00 GIFT CERTIFICATE LESSONS 332904 123113 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 8,221.00 378930 1/9/2014 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/16/14 332959 010114 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00 378931 119/2014 101387 HAPPY FACES 280.00 WINTER ICE FESTIVAL 332960 FACE PAINTER 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 280.00 378932 119/2014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,572.34 PREMIUM 333001 6595477 -8 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,572.34 378933 11912014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,609.90 CHEMICALS 00001250 332824 3548586 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,609.90 378934 1/912014 117366 HEMSTAD, BETTY 130.00 ART WORK SOLD 332905 123113 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 130.00 378935 1/912014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 150.00 BOOKING FEES 332906 1000038118 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 150.00 378936 1/9/2014 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 332907 1000038087 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 332908 1000038088 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 320.62 378937 1/912014 132466 HIGHWAY- HANDYMAN PRODUCTS INC. 1,990.38 ROLL APPLICATOR, TRIM TABLE 00001436 332825 16308 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,990.38 378938 11912014 101271, HINDING, CHRIS 125.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/09/14 332961 ALPHA BITS BAND 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION' 125.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register and Summary 119/2014 — 1/9/2014 " Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit " 378938 11912014 101271 HINDING, CHRIS Continued... 378939 118/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. - 558.00 332545 681666 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 829.50 332546 681303 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,286.50 332745 681627 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,284.00 332746 681670 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,958.00 378940 11912014 - 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC.- 144,923.00 WORKERS COMP RENEWAL 332962 167368 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,011.00 - INLAND MARINE RENEWAL 332963 167369 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22,641.00 BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE RENEWAL 332964 167367 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 53,638.00 GENERAL LIABILITY RENEWAL 332965 167370 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 225,213.00 378941 11912014 101468 IIMC 210.00 MEMBERSHIP - DEBRA MANGEN 332966 2014 1180.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ELECTION 210.00 378942 1/912014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS . 3,520.32 MAIL DEC 2013 WATER BILLS 332826 85110 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,520.32 378943 1/9/2014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY " 291.00 332547 16332 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 270.00 332548 16154 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 576.00 332747 16340 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,137.00 ' 378944 1/912014 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION LLC ' 1,190.00 BASKETBALL OFFICIATING 332692 958 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,190.00 - 378945 11912014 131548.L INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 802.86 CHAIRS 332909 IN0432722 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, HUMAN RESOURCES 802.86 378946 1/912014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,319.85 332549 2156761 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH.ST SELLING 43.00 332550 2156762 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING - R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 11712014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register and Summary - 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account-No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378946 1/912014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 307.00 332551 2156774 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING' 1,542.80 332748 2156793 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 40.00 332749 2156794 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 60.30 332750 2156796 5842.5515' COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.00 332751 2156797 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,643.38 332752 2156795 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 137.20 332753 2156789 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,289.70 332754 2156786 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19,401.23 378948 1/9/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,865.26 332552 1750019 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,181.12 332553 1750018 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,619.24 332554 1750016 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 267.36 332555 1747923 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 454.33 332556 1747924 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 736.52 332557 1744677 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,288.37 332558 1744678 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 569.78 332559 1744679 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,563.28 332560 1748642 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.12 332561 1748641 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.99 332562 1748640 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,339.87 332563 1748639 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 276.12 332564 1748637 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 841.81 332565 1748638 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 745.82 332566 1748643 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.37 332567 1748644 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,321.75 332568 1748645 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 728.08 332569 1750005 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .75 332570 1749995 5842,5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.80 332571 1749999 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,106.25 332572 1750010 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,643.82 332573 1750006 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.98 332574 1750007 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,804.89 332575 1750011 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.98 332576 1750008 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,062.40 332577 1750009 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 365.60 332578 1750012 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,064.34. 332579 1750017 .5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .56 332580 1750000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 1/912014 CITY OF EDINA 105730 KJOS, PHIL 117/2014 10:38:41 - Council Check Register by GL PIANO TUNING Page - 14 Council Check Register and Summary 378950 119/2014 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 133469 KRUEGER, JASON Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378948 11912014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. '20.51 Continued... 968.96 332581 1750015 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 645.86 332582 1750014 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 626.59 332583 1750013 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 113.12- 332584 603362 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 408.76 332755 1750002 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 54422 332756 1750001 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 139.04 332757 1750003 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 532.58 332758 1749997 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 863.56 332759 1749996 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,587.78 332760 1749998 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 378949 1/912014 105730 KJOS, PHIL - 200.00 PIANO TUNING 332693 122313 206.00 378950 119/2014 133469 KRUEGER, JASON 20.51 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332910 123113 '20.51 378951 11912014 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 996.76 BLADES, BRUSHES 00002075 332911 01 -64382 996.76 - 378952 11912014 120734 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP 240.00 CANINE TRACKER PROGRAM 332967 14333 240.00 378953 11912014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 46.72 WASHERS 00001115 332827 9302017075 _ 435.46 HARDWARE 00005860 332828 9302136033 1,001.51 WASHERS, PLOW BOLTS 00005859 332829 9302137976 1,483.69 378954 11912014 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 324.96 DVI CORD, SURGE PROTECTOR 332912 123113 324.96 378955 1/9/2014 - 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA 430.09 REIMBURSEMENT 332996 010614 1628.6103 1622.6107 5761.6406 4607.6406 1325.6531 1553.6530 1553.6530 1400.6406 1180.6107 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SIGNS & POSTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS - GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS SKATING & HOCKEY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 — 119/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 378955 11912014 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA Continued... 6.58 REIMBURSEMENT 332996 010614 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 436.67 378956 11912014 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 216.19 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 332913 1166 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.19 378957 119/2014 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 900.00 NEW HIRE ASSESSMENTS 332914 8863 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 900.00 378958 1/912014 119209 . MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 450.00 INSTALL CABLES @ ART CENTER 332915 486303 5100.1730 OFFICE FURN & EQUIPMENT 450.00 378959 11912014 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 604.92 OXYGEN 00003649 332830 08296363 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 604.92 378960 11912014 118096 M -S COMPANIES INC 2,445.00 BEAD GUNS 00005764. 332831 180546 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 2,445.00 378961 11912014 133458 MCMA 350.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION (2) 332968 2014 MID WINTER 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 350.00 378962 1/9/2014 133467 MD HEIDERSCHEID YOUR HOUSE DOCTOR 176.55 PERMIT REFUND 332832 ED127749 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 176.55 378963 1/9/2014 103944 MED COMPASS 28.00 HEARING TEST 332694 22632 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES' 28.00 378964 11912014 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 365,522.72 SEWER SERVICE 332969 0001029304 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 365,522.72 378965 1/9/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1/712014 10:38:41 Page - 15 Business Unit ELECTION ARENA ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE SEWER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 — 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 378965 119/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 358.53 RADIO 00005864 332833 487412 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 358.53 378966 1/9/2014 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 88.71 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332916 123113 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 88.71 378967 11912014 102007 - MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 213.75 SOAP DISPENSERS 00001350 332834 SOI -020368 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 213.75 378968 1/9/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,592,50 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001376 332835 34627 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,592.50 378969 11912014 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 15,669.75 WATER PURCHASED 332917 431 - 0005.3 -12/1 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 3 15,669.75 378970 1/9/2014 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 60.00 PESTICIDE APP LICENSES (4) 332970 2014 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 60.00 378971 119/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 61.03 MESH SCREEN 00001326 332836 0102149 -IN 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.03 378972 1/9/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 125.00 LIQUOR COUPON PRINTING 332695 14611 5822.6575 PRINTING 276.32 LIQUOR COUPON PRINTING 332695 14611 5842.6575 PRINTING 190.00 LIQUOR COUPON PRINTING 332695 14611 5862.6575 PRINTING 591.32 378973 11912014 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 60.64 RADIO CABLE 00. 005873 332837 519091F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 60.64 378974 1/9/2014 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 117/2014 10:38:41 Page - 16 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION PAVEMENT MARKINGS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 332971 78252368 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 378980 1/912014 130227 NIKUNEN, JESSICA Council Check Register by GL 139.58 IPAD KEYBOARD Council Check Register and Summary 123113 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 139.58 119/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 378974 1/9/2014 110.00 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 00005910 332974 Continued... - 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,635.12 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 378975 119/2014 2,114.95 106611 MULLICK, PEGGY 00005910 332974 IN -0496 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 80.00 SENIOR TRIP REFUND 332696 121913 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 80.00 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 378976 11912014 590.00 100916 MUZAK LLC 00005910 332974 IN -0496 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 248.48 MUSIC SERVICES - CENT LAKES 332972 AM44679 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 248.48 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 378977 1/912014 00005578 100916 MUZAK LLC 277454 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 264.57 MUSIC SERVICES - EDINA LIQUOR 332973 900AN01509 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 264.57 MUSIC SERVICES - EDINA LIQUOR 332973 900AN01509 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 264.57 MUSIC SERVICES - EDINA LIQUOR 332973 900AN01509 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 793.71 378978 11912014 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 240.47 INSTALL THIN ICE SIGNS 332838 1959 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 267.19 INSTALL THIN ICE SIGNS 332839 1960 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 507.66 378979 11912014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 117/2014 10:38:41 Page - 17 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR( 275.00 332585 87198 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 275.00 378980 1/912014 130227 NIKUNEN, JESSICA 139.58 IPAD KEYBOARD 332840 123113 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 139.58 378981 1/9/2014 125089 NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP 110.00 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,230.00 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 2,114.95 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 750.00 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 120.00 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 590.00 2014 SAFETY BOOTS 00005910 332974 IN -0496 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 4,914.95 378982 1/9/2014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 658.35 STEEL 00005578 332841 277454 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION . EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register and Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 378982 11912014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 658.35 378983 1/9/2014 115212 NORTH STAR CHAPTER 150.00 2014 DUES 332975 CSF 2014 1190.6105 150.00 378984 1/912014 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 302.05 ART SUPPLIES 00009306 332842 45008101 5110.6564 302.05 378985 11912014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 298.47 332586 8431136 -IN 5822.5513 2,376.77 332587 8431131 -IN 5842.5513 543.37 332588 8430345 -IN 5822.5513 1,436.30 332589 8431138 -IN 5862.5513 118.25 332590 8431146 -IN 5842.5512 4,773.16 378986 119/2014 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 DEC 2013 FEE 332697 28617313 5902.6155 39.95 378987 1/9/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 531.22 332918 6694 5761.5510 531.22 378988 11912014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 404.23 332591 2538725 5862.5512 435.85 332592 2538722 5842.5513 122.24 332593 2538720 5842.5515 422.62 332594 2538721 5842.5512 109.12 332595 2538713 5842.5513 1,404.63 332596 2538719 5842.5513 594.82 332597 2537825 5842.5512 363.64 332598 2537824 5842.5513 771.77 332599 2535300 5822.5513 525.60 332600 2535304 5822.5513 522.61 332601 2538726 5862.5513 1,646.60 332602 2538723 5862.5513 136.98 332603 2538714 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CRAFT SUPPLIES 117/2014 10:38:41 Page - 18 Business Unit ASSESSING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 117/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378988 119/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 57.12 332604 2538724 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 46.12 332762 2538716 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,055.68 332763 2538717 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 583.17 332764 2538715 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING, 9,202.80 378989 11912014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 38.40 332605 20047 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 38.40 378990 1/912014 100958 %PLUNKETT S PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 332843 4029770 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 841.21 2014 PEST CONTROL 332976 3414689 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 887.51 378991 1/9/2014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 442.50 FOAM FILL TIRES 00005583 332844 210098091 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.25 LUG NUTS 00005583 332845 210098173 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,731.72 TIRES 00005583 332846 210098335 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 223.79 TIRES 00005583 332847 210098339 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 605.48 FRONT TIRE, TRUCK VALVE 00005583 332848 210098341 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,044.74 378992 1/9/2014 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 30.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 332977 010214 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 30.00 378993 119/2014 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 227.85 DOOR HANGER WATER NOTICES 00001374 332649 064308 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 227.85 378994 1/912014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY - 604.30 CUPS, LIDS, TISSUE 00002072 332919 6694 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 604.30 378995 1/9/2014 103094 PROTECTION ONE 193.27 1/1/14 - 3/31/14 SERVICE 332978 127436541114 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 193.27 378996 1/9/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 117/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 -- 1/912014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 378996 11912014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. Continued... 60.38 BUSINESS CARDS 332920 79615 1550.6406' GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 60.38 378997 1/9/2014 113372 RONNING, TED 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/12/14 332979 010114 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 378998 1/9/2014 102066 RUST, ROGER 240.00 ICE CARVING AT FESTIVAL 332980 1/12/14 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER _ CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 240.00 378999 1/912014 104788 SANDY S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 1,066.00 FLASH DRIVES 332981 SH2198 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,066.00 379000 1/912014 133463 SANFORD, MARLENE 1,421.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 332698 123113 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,421.00 379001 1/9/2014 130921 SCHAEFER, LISA 144.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332997 SEPT -DEC 2013 1170.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES 144.64 379002 11912014 130063 SCHWEITZER, JOHN 169.95 STEEL TOE BOOTS 333002 010114 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 169.95 379003 1/912014 102075 SCULPTURE ICE 124.43 ICE BLOCKS FOR FESTIVAL 332982 CARVING 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 124.43 379004 11912014 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 80.00 9K BOARDING REIMBURSEMENT 332998 010614 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION - 80.00 379005 1/9/2014 100995 SEH 770.45 FEASIBILITY STUDY 332850 275253 07119.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 5119 YORK AVE SIDEWALK W SIDE 575.38' FEASIBILITY STUDY 332850 275253 07116.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S116 VERNON AVE NORTH SIDE 575.38 FEASIBILITY STUDY 332850 275253 07118.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK 7,386.73 54TH ST ENGINEERING 332851 275252 01416.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 54TH ST BRIDGEBSTREET REPAIR. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 117/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 -- 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379005 1/9/2014 100995 SEH Continued... 7,092.86 NORMANDALE ST RECON 332852 275250 01394.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE 6,762.51 NORMANDALE ST RECON 332852 275250 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 4,715.62 NORMANDALE ST RECON 332852 275250 05530.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 1,884.95 NORMANDALE ST RECON 332852 275250 04390.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 4,412.69 NORMANDALE ST RECONS 332853 276463 01394.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE 4,207.16 NORMANDALE ST RECONS 332853 276463 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 2,933.73 NORMANDALE ST RECONS 332853 276463 05530.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 1,172.69 NORMANDALE ST RECONS 332853 276463 04390.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 42,490.15 379006 1/912014 133468 SIGN CAD SYSTEMS INC. 14,389.46 SIGN MAKING EQUIPMENT 00004039 332854 104784 1325.6531 SIGNS 8 POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 14,389.46 379007 119/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 4,717.27 EAST ARENA GRAPHICS 332983 7329 5500.1720 BUILDINGS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 4,717.27 379008 1/9/2014 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 95.84 HOT DOG BUNS 332921 233419 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 219.28 HOT DOG BUNS '332922 237372 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 315.12 379009 1/9/2014 100629 SMITH, AMY 138.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 332923 123113 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 138.99 379010 11912014 133462 SMITH, DARRELL 93.43 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 332699 123113 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.43 379011 1/912014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,296.78 332606 1116709 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 378.50 332607 1116701 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,283.68 332608 1116705 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,948.00 332609 1114344 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,827.45 332610 1116708 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,735.31 332611 1116706 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 544.84 332612 1116707 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .92 332613 1116704 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 TRANSMITTER 332855 1518930 CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS 1/7/2014 10:38:41 116.61 TAIL LAMP 00005870 332856 1519765 1553.6530 Council Check Register by GL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Page- 22 131040 TLO LLC 114.75 Council Check Register and Summary 379015 1/9/2014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 114.75 1/9/2014 -- 1/9/2014 332768 00771566 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379011 11912014 1,740.90 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 332770 797108 Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,673.10 1,283.28 332765 1116702 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 379016 11912014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.52 332766 1117361 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 332986 2013- 116148 290.00 ADVERTISING OTHER 332767 1117362 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 332986 2013 - 116148 5842.6122 4,850.00 YORK SELLING 332999 5004223 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 27,769.28 379012 1/9/2014 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 7,415.40 FIRST QUARTER 332984 201402 1132.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CABLE COMMISSION 7,415.40 379013 119/2014 105352 STEPHENSON, TED 98.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 332985 010314 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 98.97 379014 1/912014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 198.23 TRANSMITTER 332855 1518930 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.61 TAIL LAMP 00005870 332856 1519765 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 314.84 131040 TLO LLC 114.75 DEC 2013 SERVICE 332924 269634 -DEC 1400.6105 379015 1/9/2014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 114.75 140.00 - 332768 00771566 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 72.20 332769 797109 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,740.90 332770 797108 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,673.10 379016 11912014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 332986 2013- 116148 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 332986 2013 - 116148 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 332986 2013 - 116148 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 379017 119/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 221.65 HYDRAULIC FILTERS 00005897 332857 2822217 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 205.74 SWITCHES 332858 2845709 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 427.39 379018 1/9/2014 131040 TLO LLC 114.75 DEC 2013 SERVICE 332924 269634 -DEC 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 114.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 — 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379019 1/9/2014 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC Continued... 270.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAM 332700 102153721 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 270.00 379020 1/9/2014 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 4.75 DOOR LOCK PARTS 332701 620073 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 4.75 379021 1/9/2014 103048 U.S. BANK 1,800.00 ADMIN FEES 332988 3570899 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 1,800.00 379022 1/9/2014 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYING AGENT 332989 3571014 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 425.00 379023 1/912014 104223 UNITED PROPERTIES 615,536.69 TIF ASSISTANCE PAY 2013 332925 123013 9232.8225 INTEREST OTHER FUNDS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 615,536.69 379024 11912014 100668 URS CORPORATION 1,202.78 PROMENADE PHASE 4 332859 5749453 01251.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE 1,202.78 379025 1/912014 124504 US HWY 169 CORRIDOR COALITION 3,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 332987 2014 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 3,000.00 379026 1/912014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 271.14 LIQUOR BAGS 332702 296732 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 592.37 LIQUOR BAGS 332703 296729 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 155.40 LIQUOR BAGS 332704 296729 -01 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 151.92 LIQUOR BAGS 332705 296732 -01 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 1,170.83 379027 11912014 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA ^ 1,346.63 CLEANING SERVICE DEC 2013 332926 27896 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,980.00 CLEANING SERVICE JAN2014 332990 27897 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 3,326.63 379028 11912014 115380 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379028 119/2014 115380 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC. Continued... _ 41,351.43 BRINE SYSTEM 00004040 332860 IN060- 1001005 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,322.61 SINGLE WALL TANK 00004040 332861 IN060- 1001102 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 939.72 PUMP 00005858 332862 IN060- 1001356 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44, 613.76 379029 1/912014 132372 VERIFIED CREDENTIALS 22.00 BACKGROUND SCREENING -DEC 332927 217129 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 22.00 379030 1/9/2014, 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 157.73 CIRCUIT BREAKER 00001448 332863 7939657 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 157.73 379031 1/9/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 70.38 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332928 38426702 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 54.45 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332929 38451303 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS . 18.61 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332930 38453542 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,105.05 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332931 38451427 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 29.95- CREDIT 332932 41869560 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,218.54 379032 1/912014 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,875.00 FIRST QUARTER RETAINER 333003 213026 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,875.00 379033 1/912014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 695.88 BULBS 00001428 332864 15238515 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,157.97 STREET LIGHT BULBS 00001435 332865 15238516 -00 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,082.99 WALL SCONCES 00001437 332866 15238541 -00 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4,936.84 379034 1/9/2014 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 105.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 332991 010614 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 105.00 379035 1/9/2014 130574 WATSON COMPANY 527.49 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332933 834396 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 556.18 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332934 834473 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 510.05 CONCESSION PRODUCT 332992 834603 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,593.72 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379035 11912014 130574 WATSON COMPANY 379036 11912014 101501 WENZEL HEATING & AIR COND 57.50 PERMIT REFUND 332867 ED 127916 1495.4115 57.50 379037 1/912014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,897.45 332614 349849 -00 5862.5513 629.58 332615 349857 -00 5842.5513 951.55 332616 349395 -00 5822.5513 326.30 332617 349695 -00 5822.5513 120.00 332618 349693 -00 5862.5513 180.00 332771 349848 -00 5822.5513 4,104.88 379038 119/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,472.39 332619 486198 5862.5513 1.12 332620 486194 5862.5513 663.28 332621 485777 5822.5513 1,826.59 332622 485152 5822.5513 700.81 332623 485857 5842.5513 .75 332624 486193 5842.5513 3,054.04 332625 486197 5842.5513 260.83 332772 486195 5822.5513 19.12 332773 486196 5822.5515 420.00 332774 486283 5842.5513 324.33 332775 486260 5862.5513 12.00- 332776 63284 5822.5513 8,731.26 379039 1/9/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 3,703.81 332626 1080126813 5862.5513 475.83 332627 1080126924 5862.5515 219.45 332628 1080124665 5822.5513 2,017.30 332629 1080124299 5822.5513 3,043.57 332630. 1080125767 5842.5512 45.15 332631 1080126927 5822.5515 310.45 332632 1080126926 5822.5513 146.30 332633 1080126930 5842.5515 5,324.33 332634 1080126929 5842.5513 7,133.92 332635 1080126928 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description Continued... MECHANICAL PERMITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1(7/2014 10:38:41 Page - 25 Business Unit INSPECTIONS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 379039 119/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,852.79 1,451.50 1,003.51 1,508.41 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/9/2014 - 119/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No 332636 1080126812 5862.5512 332777 1080127532 5842.5513 332778 1080126925 5822.5512 332779 1080124298 5822.5512 332780 2080024580 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLO LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1M2014 10:38:41 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 28,186.32 379040 119/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE. MINNESOTA BEER INC 123.06 332637 1090159597 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,712.00 332638 1090159596 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 361.50 332639 1090159595 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,703.92 332640 1090159594 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,252.00 332781 1090160866 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 332.50 332782 1090160868 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,590.95 332783 1090160867 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,075.87 379041 1/9/2014 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 669.36 GLOVES 00003717 332868 E1149317 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 669.36 379042 1/912014 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 4,283.25 THINK BANK TRAFFIC STUDY 332935 2 -01686 -490 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 4,283.25 379044 1/912014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 355.89 51- 5547446 -1 332706 395396834 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 2,783.34 51- 0610060454 -7 332707 395570148 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 8,029.93 51- 4621797 -2 332708 395599462 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 159.62 51- 9608462 -5 332709 395464035 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 997.82 51- 9011854 -4 332710 395453591 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 6.66 51- 0193479 -4 332711 395313589 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 29.59 51- 9770163 -6 332712 395462561 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 295.90 51- 8987646 -8 332713 395449888 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 62.37 51- 8976004 -9 332714 395454514 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 27.82 51- 4420190 -3 332715 395378140 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 41.62 51- 0010103585 -7 332716 395468334 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 92.65 51- 6692497 -0 332717 395418347 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 16.34 51- 0194596 -8 332718 395136965 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 38.89 51- 0010118404 -0 332719 395296044 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 119/2014 -- 1/9/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379044 1/9/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 579.97 51- 0010166207 -2 332720 395297711 1646.6185 20.59 51- 0160483 -1 332721 395137016 1330.6185 24.09 51- 0223133 -2 332722 395136740 1322.6185 14.30 51- 6541084 -2 332723 395247411 1646.6185 69.92 51- 8997917 -7 332724 395279650 1321.6185 127.92 51- 9770164 -7 332725 395288078 1321.6185 11,412.31 51- 9603061 -0 332726 395494422 1552.6185 1,282.96 51- 9251919 -0 332727 395629713 5765.6185 37.68 51- 8102668 -0 332728 395618318 1321.6185 85.60 51- 6046826 -0 332729 395768277 5422.6185 163.93 51. 9337452 -8 332730 395822810 1321.6185 .29.24 51- 395765989 332731 395765989 4086.6185 14.30 51- 6050184.2 332869 395247352 4086.6103 5,065.18 51- 6955679 -8 333000 396129204 1551.6185 31,866.43 379045 1/912014 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 6,581.20 DIESEL FUEL 00005937 332870 600094 6,581.20 379046 119/2014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL $ERVICE 92.30 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 92.30 1,824,721.24 Grand Total 332936 54060384 1553.6581 5510.6610 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,824,721.24 Total Payments 1,824,721.24 GASOLINE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1/7/2014 10:38:41 Page - 27 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROMENADE EXPENSES STREET LIGHTING REGULAR MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR AQUATIC WEEDS AQUATIC WEEDS CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 437,693.95 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 1,921.21 03200 CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 1,800.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 44,529.95 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,252.01 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 8,079.69 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 10,311.50 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 18,887,12 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 700.00 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 6,959.32 05800 LIQUOR FUND 196,519.36 05900 UTILITY FUND 444,901.78 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 15,571.96 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,192.02 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 624,844.63 09900 PAYROLL FUND 7,556.74 . Report Totals 1,824,721.24 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1/9/2014 - 1/9/2014 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in.all material respects, with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing =p �l and nrAt -prh ingQ data 117/2014 10:38:48 Page- 1 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation . PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379047 1116/2014 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 688.48 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 333004 021041346 5720.6180 CONTRACTED. REPAIRS ` 688.48 379048 111612014 100613 AAA " 2,492.20 LICENSE TAB RENEWALS " 333350 CITY VEHICLES 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS - 2,492.20 379049 1116/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 32.00 333120 1751885 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 32.00 379050 1/1612014 129458 ACME TOOLS 125.93 SAW BLADES, CUT OFF WHEEL 00001468 333256 2375744 1301.6556 TOOLS 125.93 379051 1116/2014 133483" ACTIVE011 INC. 253.00 ACTIVE911 SERVICE 333092 010814 1401.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 253.00 379052 1116/2014 133471 ADVANTAGE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC. - . 4,589.48 RAMP REPAIR 333311 00021246 4090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4,589.48 379053 111612014 133504 AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1,482.00 HEATERS FOR RESTROOMS 00002077 333312, 42779 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,482.00 379054 1/16/2014 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 103.40 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 333005 126041 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 103.40 379055 1/1612014 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 34,192.80 RECYCLING 333232 3379702 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 34,192.80 379056 1/16/2014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 110.93 COFFEE 333006 114848 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 110.93 379057 111612014 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page 1 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS RECYCLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL. RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL ' ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS Council Check Register and Summary YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 1/16/2014 -- 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379057 1/16/2014 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 89.25 ACFE COURSE 333236 010814 1400.6104 89.25 379058 1/16/2014 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 6,317.00 COMMERCIAL PACKAGE POLICY 333257 6100000149592 1556.6200 6,317.00 - 379059 1/1612014 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 498.33 CONCESSION PRODUCT 333007 2045485 5736.5510 285.25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 333008 2045900 5730.5510 338.02 CONCESSION. PRODUCT 333009 2043341 5730.5510 564.55 CONCESSION PRODUCT 333093 2047430 5730.5510 9;686.15 - 379060 1/1612014- 118491 APPLE INC. 89.00 IPAD WARRANTY 00004375 333010: 4266181448 1495.6406 ) 867.83 IPAD 00004375 333011 4266490323 1495.6406` 267.00 IPAD WARRANTY 00004385 333012 4268945410 1470.6406 2,603.48 IPADS 0.0004385 333013 4269112955 1470.6406 3,827.31 379,061 1/16/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 662.00 333121 38192 5842.5514 783.00 - 333377 38193 5862.5514 1,445.00 379062 1/1612014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 84.91 333014 123113 5422.6182 26.30 333014 123113 5511.6182 24.00 333014 123113 5841.6182 `. 262.59 333258 JAN2014 7411.6182 397.80 379063 1/16/2014 101195 AUTO. ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC.. 94.95 ALTERNATOR PART 333259 154689 1553.6530 94.95 379064 1/16/2014 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUADS 1,890.00 INSTALL BATTERY CHARGERS . 333015 4034 1400.6215 1,890.00 Subledger Account Description Continued:.. CONFERENCES '& SCHOOLS INSURANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page- 2 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL ' ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT, GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 'Council Check Register and Summary ' 1/16/2014 -- 1/16/2014 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379064 111612014 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUADS Continued... 379065 111612014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3,488.50 STORMWATER MGMT 333313 23270354.00 -202 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 2,614.50 SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS 333314 23271332.00 -2 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 22,102.00 PLANNING SERVICES 333315' 23270354.13 -2 04406:1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION IMPR 6,533.00 SEWER MODEL RECALIBRATION 333316 23271331.00 -3:. 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER ' 34,738.00 379066 1116/2014 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 2,086.52 HOCKEY GOALS 00001430 333016 00097099 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 2,086.52 379067 1/16/2014 101343 BEHR, JASON 117.56 REIMBURSE FOR BOARDING 333351 K9 BLADE 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES_ EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 117.56 379068 1/1612014 - 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 20.50 333376 41352300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 620.90 333379 41352200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 390.45 333380 6398500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 125.50 333381 89612600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,157.35 ' 379069 1/1612014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 432.00 PIZZA 333017 D281N1537 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 360.00 .PIZZA 333018 D281N1561 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 360.00 PIZZA 333019 b281N1572 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 504.00 PIZZA 333094 1)281N1569 - 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS _ 1,656.00 379070 1116/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 453.60 333122 104954 5842.5514 -COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 595.50 333382 104957 5862.5514 COST OF 60ODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 104.00 333383 104956 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,153.10 379071 1/1612014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 154.90 COFFEE 333317 1130387 5520,5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 154.90 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379072 1116/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 108.99 CORKBOARD 333020 WO- 896755 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 14.16- RETURN 333021 CP- WO- 894487 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.57 WALL PLANNER 333022 WO- 897993 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 88.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 333023 OE- 339386 -1 1263.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENVIRONMENT 13.50 POSTCARDS 333023 OE- 339386 -1 01393.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MENDELSSOHN A 20.08 POSTCARDS 333023 OE- 339386 -1 01398.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES LAKE EDINA B 13.50 POSTCARDS 333023 OE- 339386 -1 01395.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BRAEMAR HILLS B 17.31 MECHANICAL PENCILS 333024 WO- 901012 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 35.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 333025 WO- 897881 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 54.50 CORKBOARD 333026 OE- 339311 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 184.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 333237 OE- 341015 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 143.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003035 333245 WO- 895490 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003014 333246 WO- 903092 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.80 DESK CALENDARS 00003012 333247 OE- 341581 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 166.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003038 333248 WO- 900840 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003039 333249 WO- 901180 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,027.25 379073 111612014 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 352.24 LOCK REPAIRS @ COUNTRYSIDE PK 333359 S84902 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 352.24 379074 1/16/2014 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL- JAN 2014 333260 1813 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 379075 1/1612014 133490 BOLSETH, JAMES 139.77 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 333233 010914 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 139.77 379076 1/1612014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 11,834.00 SANI SEWER LINING 333027 0162705 03485.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRUNK SS LINING 1,344.50 COUNTRYSIDE SURVEYING 333360 0159294 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATI• 3,662.00 333361 0159964 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 1,292.00 333362 0160738 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 102.00 333363 0162706 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATI 18,234.50 379077 1/1612014 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP 16,736.74 DEC 2013 FEES 333250 123113 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS100 333319 924843154 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 481.75 CITY OF EDINA 333318 380277 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE Council Check Register by GL 481.75 Council Check Register and Summary 379082 1/1612014 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379077 1/1612014 333095 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP 1628.4392.07 Continued... SENIOR CITIZENS 18,736.74 58.00 379078 1/16/2014 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 379083 111612014 131731 BROWNING, RYAN 3,293.25 SHOP SUPPLIES 00001446 333028 906707933 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,293.25 353.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333167 379079 1116/2014 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC . 353.66 605.98 AEDTRAINER 00003720 333165 81288527 1470.6579 TRAININGAIDS 379084 1,109.00 AIRWAY TRAINING KIT 00003722 333166 81289979 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS 1,714.98 1,920.00 379080 1116/2014 00000154093 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1/1412014 11:23:15 Page- 5 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,178.84 333123 117524 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,178.84 379081 111612014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 200.00 379086 1/16/2014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 128.13 THERMAL MITTS 333319 924843154 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 481.75 MATERIALS TESTING 333318 380277 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 128.13 481.75 379082 1/1612014 129439 BROWN, BERNICE 58.00 PLYMOUTH PLAYHOUSE TRIP REFUND 333095 010614 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 58.00 379083 111612014 131731 BROWNING, RYAN 353.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333167 010714 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 353.66 379084 1/16/2014 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 1,920.00 MNJIS OCT -DEC 2013 333029 00000154093 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 379085 1/16/2014 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/30/14 333254 010114 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 379086 1/16/2014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 128.13 THERMAL MITTS 333319 924843154 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 68.47 333320 924761930 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL-SALES 68.47- 333321 924798431 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 128.13 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379086 111612014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF Continued... 379087 111612014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 112.18 OCE USAGE 333322 988134472 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 112.18 379088 1/1612014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 445.05 333124 415634 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,821.15 333125 415635 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,266.20 379089 1/16/2014 100677 CARGILL INC. 12,708.62 ROAD SALT 00005070 333030 2901475795 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 4,376.57 ROAD SALT 00005071 333031 2901475796 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 33,193.87 ROAD SALT 00005070 333168 2901482623 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,101.53 ROAD SALT 333169 2901486297 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,069.20 ROAD SALT 333170 2901489866 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 54,449.79 379090 111612014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 7,124.99 VIDEO STORAGE 333032 1 BDY6BP 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,384.80 REPLACEMENT DISPLAYS 333033 1 BDY69X 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,294.46 TABLETS 00004364 333171 HR50911 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15,804.25 379091 1/16/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 88.56 952 941 -1019 333096 1019 -12/13 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 112.40 952 826 -7398 333097 7398 -12/13 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 850.63 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 325.58 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 169.92 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 59.91 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 281.46 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 122.02 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 143.61 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 57.21 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 192.76 612 Z28 -0146 333098 0146 -12/13 5932.6168 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 606.52 612 E12 -6797 333352 6797 -1/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 98.93 612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD911 333353 0056 -1/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 104.93 612 E23 -0652 GV911 333354 0652 -1/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 3,214.44 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379091 111612014 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 379092 111612014 133491 CHAPMAN III, GREGORY 849.55 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 333234 010914 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 849.55 379093 1116/2014 133486 CHHATWAL, ARINASH 42.00 DAILY PASSES REFUND 333261 010214 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 3.06 DAILY PASSES REFUND 333261 010214 5700.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 45.06 379094 1/1612014 130440 CHRISTIANSEN, YVONNE 50.00 LIQUOR STORE PROMO 333323 101 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 50.00 379095 1116/2014 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 266.67 ABOUT TOWN ADVERTISING 333099 COM -0190 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 266.67 ABOUT TOWN ADVERTISING 333099 COM -0190 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 266.66 ABOUT TOWN ADVERTISING 333099 COM -0190 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 800.00 379096 1116/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA -UTILITIES 2,308.87 00077479- 0113317143 333034 113317143 -12/13 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,308.87 379097 1/1612014 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 1,388.13 2013 GRIT PIT COST 00001385 333172 24066 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,388.13 379098 1/16/2014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 132.00 333126 0198029612 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 237.84 333384 0198029736 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 369.84 379099 1/1612014 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 325.00 COCOA 00002078 333262 0747684 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 325.00 379100 1116/2014 133487 COLONY RENTALS 2,300.00 DOOR REPLACEMENT 333173 13- 002388 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,300.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 -11:23:15 • Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check #. Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379100 1/16/2014 133487 COLONY RENTALS Continued... 379101 111612014 120433 COMCAST 90.90 8772 10 614 0164959 333263 164959 -12/13 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE. 90.90 .379102 1116/2014 J 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 93.62 MOTAR PATCH: MIX 00001197 333174 0106145 -IN 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - BRIDGES GUARD. RAILS 93.62 . 379103 1/1612014 133173 CRABTREE COMPANIES INC. 26,212.10 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE 333231 1448 -2ND HALF 4416.6710 EOUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENI 26;212.10 379104 1.11612014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,396.57 UNIFORMS 333100 25810 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,169.15 POPCORN BAGS 333264 2572603 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD. ARENA CONCESSIONS 3,606.65 POPCORN BAGS 333265 2424404 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 8,172.37 379105 1/1612014 104020 DALCO 109.55 FLOOR CLEANER REPAIR 333175 2656519 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - 819.73 FLOOR SCRUBBER REPAIRS 333176 2693007 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 929.28 379106 1/1612014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,636.10 333127 734368 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING -.1,467.68 333385 734365 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 269.10 333386 734367 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER- 50TH ST SELLING 3,372.88 - 379107 111612014 101534 DELI DOUBLE 359.04 MEETING BUFFET 333266 102620 7414.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PUBLIC PROGRAMS 359.04 379108 1/16/2014 115356 DIEKMAN, LARRY 119.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 333268 010614 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 119.94 379109 1116/2014 123162 DISH 53.47' 8255 7070 8142 2839 333267 2839 -1/14. 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 -- 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379109 1/16/2014 123162 DISH _ Continued... REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 1114/2014 11:23:15 Page- 9 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL E911 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.47 379110 111612014 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 654.40 PHOTO -EYES 00001451 333177 10566100 1322.6530 60.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 00001439 333178 10553200 1470.6406 714.42 379111 111612014 133476 EDINA DESIGN BUILD LLC 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -6409 RYAN AVE 333035 ED127141 1495.4109 2,500.00 379112 111612014 100049 EHLERS 300.00 TIF CONSULTING 333324 347152 9232.6136 300.00 379113 111612014 101627 ELASKY, JEFF 120.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 333101 010714 1400.6203 120.00 379114 1/1612014 121440 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK INC. 15,000.00 2014 CODE RED SERVICE 333102 ECN- 015496 2310.6103 15,000.00 379116 1/1612014 106213 EMSAR INC. 647.45 COT REPAIRS 333179 SI -37972 1470.6180 647.45 379116 111612014 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 2,610.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 333269 010814 1470.6104 2,610.00 379117 1/16/2014 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,162.00 DEC 2013 BILLINGS 333180 1142 1470.6103 6,162.00 379118 111612014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 37.44 TUBEASSEMBLY 333181 69- 123594 1553.6530 28.90 BULBS 333270 69- 124006 1553.6530 13.47 WASH 333271 1- 4350428 1553.6530 24.60 LAMPS 333272 69- 124314 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 1114/2014 11:23:15 Page- 9 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL E911 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF.EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379118 1116/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY =. Continued... 104.41 379119 1/16/2014 130136 FADS, SUSAN 39.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333325 123113 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL .' 39.55 379120 1/16/2014 133295 FEED THE DOG 2,615.50 LIVING STREETS DEVELOPMENT 333036 123113_LS 2501.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT , PACS IS 2,615.50 379121 111612014 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 1,140.00 RINK HOSES 0000,1340 333037 65762 1646.6577 -LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,140.00 379122 1116/2014 120831 F_IRSTSCRIBEINC. 425.00 ROWAY 333103 2461669 ,1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT . 425.00. 379123 1/1612014 133484 FRIENDS OF THE EDINA LIBRARY 293.25 HRRC EDINA READS BOOKS - 333119 010714 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 293.25 379124 1116/2014 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMP_ ANY - MINNEAPOLIS 506.60 AUTO PARTS 333182 123113 155376530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.44 AUTO PARTS 333182 123113 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 11.84 AUTO PARTS 333182 123113 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS " - MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS` 14.94 AUTO PARTS 333182 123113 5422,6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 650.82 379125 111612014 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC." 370.95 DEC 2013 SERVICE 333183 87032 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 370.95 379126.1/16/2014 101103 GRAINGER 71.18 .LIGHTBULBS 00002271 333038 9320717458 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 50.62 GLOVES 00005936 333039 9326499218 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.51 HAND RATCHET 00005940 333184 9327546660 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.46 CLEANER, SPRAYER 00005940 333185 9327546678 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.91 SAFETY GLASSES 00001455: • 333186 9328296810' 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 138.20 DRY ERASE BOARD 00001407 333251 9325780295 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. CITY OF EDINA 2,896.42 Council Check Register by GL 333276 PLY0447167 7411.6710 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379126 111612014 TRAINING - SHAUN WHITE 101103 GRAINGER 900093023 Continued... 19.04 SAFETY GLASSES 333273 9333214550 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.75 SAFETY GLASSES 333274 9332800508 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 238.79 EAR PLUGS 333275 9333214568 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32807 70.30 WASHERS 00001180 333364 9281003112 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 897.76 379131 111612014 379127 1116/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 354.75 33110 333128 161764 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,475.08 1,942.25 333129 161623 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 379132 1/16/2014 5,167.75 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 333387 161622 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 379128 1/1612014 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 2,896.42 COMPRESSORFORAC 333276 PLY0447167 7411.6710 2,896.42 379129 111612014 124775 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY 1,342.70 TRAINING - SHAUN WHITE 333187 900093023 1470.6104 1,342.70 379130 1/1612014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 325.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSE 333040 32807 1400.6104 325.00 379131 111612014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 333277 33110 1470.6103 2,475.08 379132 1/16/2014 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,272.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE 333188 131138014 1470.6151 1,796.70 RADIO ADMIN FEE 333238 131238015 1400.6230 3,068.70 379133 111612014 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 50.00 TRAINING - CRAIG ESSIG 333278 00303990 1470.6104 50.00 379134 111612014 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 668.00 PC FOR SIGN SHOP 00004377 333041 53715473 1325.6531 179.55 MONITOR FOR SIGN SHOP 00004377 333042 53729234 1325.6531 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page - 11 Business Unit PSTF RANGE PSTF RANGE PSTF RANGE PAVEMENT MARKINGS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS I FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SIGNS & POSTS SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379134 1/16/2014 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY Continued... 203.06 DISPLAY 333189 53722021 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,050.61 379135 111612014 133466 HIGHWAY HANDYMAN PRODUCTS INC.. 1,390.00 ROLLAPPLICATOR 00001459 333279 16314 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,390.00 379136 1116/2014 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 3,041.25 SCRUBBER 00002267 333043 600970472 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 286.78 HAIR/BODY SOAP 00002273 333044 600972594 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,328.03 379137 111612014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,003.58 333130 682981 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 492.79 333388 682585 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,496.37 379138 111612014 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 80.58 PARTS /SUPPLIES 333365 121313 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 65.22 PARTS /SUPPLIES 333365 121313 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 11.20 PARTS /SUPPLIES 333365 121313 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 210.98 PARTS /SUPPLIES 333365 121313 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 367.98 379139 111612014 100417 HORIZON-COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 650.82 CHLORINE, ACID MAGIC 00002262 333045 13121006 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 263.77 CALCIUM HYPO, SODIUM BICARB 00002269 333046 13121609 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 914.59 379140 1/1612014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 60.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333355 010914 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 195.49 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333366 123113 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 255.97 379141 1/16/2014 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 1,200.00 OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS 333190 D269137 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,200.00 379142 1/16/2014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 614.83 MAIL DEC LATE NOTICES 333047 85194 5902,6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register and Summary - 1/16/2014 — 1116/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379142 1116/2014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS Continued... 614.83 379143 1/16/2014 133488 INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION SERVICES INC. 160:00 EXTINGUISHER TRAINING BOX 00003731 333191 22276 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 160.00 379144 1116/2014 131548 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 356.16 OFFICE CHAIR 333239 IN0434199 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING' 356.16 379145 1/16/2014 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 373.50 CUSTOM SHOULDER EMBLEMS 333104 31537 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE - POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 373.50 379146 111612014 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 600.00 DOG LICENSE E- COMMERCE 333048 JJ5345 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 600.00 379147. 1/16/2014 102146 JESSEN PRESS 213.75 LETTERHEAD 333192 40509 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL' 12,283.00 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 333326 40563 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 12,496.75 379148 1/1612014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,200.00 333131 2167804 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS.SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,600.00 333132 2167805 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING _ 2,324.66 333389 2167822 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,298.79 333390 2167824 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 10,423.45 379149 1116/2014 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND- 5104'HANKERSON 333049 ED127007 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379150 1/1612014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 199.88 333133 1753213 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,280.31 333134 1753210 .. 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,682.90 333135 1753214 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 282.48- 333136 1753211 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE YORK SELLING 1,409.14 333137 1753206. 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379150 111612014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 3,215.61 333138 1753212 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR '. YORK SELLING 589.59 333139 1753215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 89.12- 333140 602962 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 77.62- 333141 601809 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 57.12- 333142 603690 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21048.03 333391 1756812 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING ' 2,567.41 333392 1756814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,438.08 333393 1756808 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4 1,968.22 333394 1756810 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 263.09 333395 1756815 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ > VERNON SELLING 51.12 333396 1756809 5862.5512 COST-OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20,772.00 379151 1/1612014 129918 JOHNSON, BRIAN 162.51 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 333280 010914 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF'RANGE 162.51 379152 1/1612014 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY ' 303.79'_ HVAC PARTS 00001443 333193 031081 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS _ FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 42.91 PILOT, SWITCH 00001382 333194 031763 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 95.00 IGNITION 00001461 333281 032720 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION.MAINT_ 441.70 3.7915.3 1/1612014 103230 JOHNSTON'S SALES & SERVICE 35.19 VACUUM BAGS 333105 8115 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 35.19 VACUUM BAGS 333105 8115 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 70.38 379154 111612014 124002 KIMLEY•HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 60,246.23 IMPROVEMENT FEASIBLITY STUDY 333327 5413369 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 45,490.97 IMPROVEMENT- FEASIBILTY STUDY 333328 5413372 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 105,737.20 379155 1/1612014 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. 52.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333240 123113 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS 52.55 379166 1/1612014 .118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 114.86 PETTY CASH 333282 011014 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 29.75 PETTY CASH 333282 011014 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS.SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date. Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379156 111612014 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA Continued.:. 36.35 PETTY CASH 333282 011014 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 180.96 379157 111612014 131966 KOTHRADE SEWER WATER & EXCAVATING 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -5809 ZENITH AVE 333050 ED126505 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2;500.00 - 379158 1116/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW 333376 011314 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 153.74 379159 1/16/2014 133477 LAKEWEST CONSTRUCTION LLC 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -5633 TRACY AVE 333051 ED113838 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379160 1/1612014 100852. LAWSON PRODUCT_ S INC. 475.94 . DRILL BITS 00001442 333052 9302137977 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 762.31 CAP SCREWS, TY -RAP, NUTS 00005866 333053 9302141945 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN " 34.26 PLOW BOLTS 00005859 333195 9302143451' 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 565.46 HEX CAPS, NUTS, WASHERS 00001278. 333367 9302057505 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,837.97 379161 111612014 130014 LIGHTING HOUSE USA INC. 46,656.00 EDINBOROUGH LED RETROFIT 333368 20139 5700.1720 BUILDINGS, EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 46,656.00 379162 1/1612014 100858_ LOGIS 6,384.00 333054 37751 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE - 2,717.00 333054 37751 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION ° 5,591.00.. 333054 37751 1190.6160. DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 3,336.00 333054 37751 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 1,759.00 333054, 37751 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,289.00 333054 37751 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,406.00 333054 37751 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 1,068.75 INSIGHT LICENSE 333055- 37795 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 29,550.75 379163 1116/2014 118625 LORENTZ, MICHAEL 111.95 - UNIFORM PURCHASE 333106 010314 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 111.95 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014.11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register and Summary 1116/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379163 1116/2014 118625 LORENTZ, MICHAEL Continued... 378164 1/16/2014 125208:-- LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 173.68. MILEAGE, REIMBURSEMENT 333056 123113 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 173.68 379165 1116/20.14 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 120.09 POPCORN MACHINE REPAIR 333329 1178 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA'CONCESSIONS 120.09 379166 .1/16/2014 124000. MARTIN, KAYLIN 111.59 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 333241 123113 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 111.59 -. 379167 111612014 101928 MCKENME, THOMAS 62.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 333196 010814 1400.620.3 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 62.99 379168 111612014 101483 MENARDS 59.96. BULBS 00001463 333107 46278 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 112.44 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 00001168 333197 40304 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 20.98 LUMBER .: 00001408 333198 44685 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 154.77 SHELVING MATERIALS 00001464 333283 46508 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 76.76 LUMBER 00001163 333369 40204 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 119.67 -. PATH MARKERS' 00001170 333370 40319 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 544.58 379169 ,1116/2014 100885 METRO SALES INC 601.71 RICOH MAINT -ADMIN 333330 10408A 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 766.29- CREDIT 333331 10520A 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 23,385.32 NEW RICOH COPIER 00004392 333332 08259A 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 23,220.74 379170 1/16/2014 102729 'METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 413.87 ROD ASSEMBLY, END ASSEMBLIES 00005863 333199 487413 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 413.87 379171 111612014 104650 MICRO CENTER 339.91 KEYBOARD, MICE 333057 4604315 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT- CENT SERV GEN - MIS 339.91 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 -- 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379172 1116/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 78.87 FOUNDERS DAY PROGRAMS 333242 14537 1100.6103 52.56 AUTHOR'S STUDIO POSTERS 333333 14625 5110.6122 131.43 379173 1116/2014 130960 MNCAR EXCHANGE, THE 225.00 USER FEES 333108 2014023 9232.6105 225.00 379174 111612014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 7,650.65 TURF ACTUATOR 00001440 333058 939957 -00 1647.6103 7,650.65 379175 111612014 133505 MURPHY SECURITY SOLUTION LLC 3,045.56 SECURITY SYSTEM DOOR 333334 5667 5511.6406 3,045.56 379176 1116/2014 104431 NENA 92.00 MEMBERSHIP - J. RADDE 333284 300012429 1400.6105 92.00 379177 1116/2014 131649 NEOPOST GREAT PLAINS 261.50 POSTAGE METER INK 333285 GPAR16710 1550.6235 261.50 379178 1/1612014 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 784.87 POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTENANCE 333109 51220738 1554.6230 784.87 379179 111612014 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 1,286.98 TABLECOVERS 333059 261547 5720.5510 1,286.98 379180 1/16/2014 130988 NEUENDORF, BILL 245.00 EDAM CONFERENCE 333356 011014 9232.6104 95.00 SUMMIT REGISTRATION (2) 333357 JAN 22 1100.6104 95.00 SUMMIT REGISTRATION (2) 333357 JAN 22 1120.6104 435.00 379181 1116/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 758.50 333143 87349 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING OTHER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page - 17 Business Unit CITY COUNCIL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POSTAGE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379181 111612014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. Continued... 251.00 333397 87348 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,009.50 379182 1/1612014 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 402.56 RANGE PASSES 333286 5835 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 402.56 379183 111612014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 189.52 LENS 00005791 333200 34912 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 189.52 379184 1/1612014 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 1,809.72 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 333287 010914 01394.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS NORMANDALE 2,686.70 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 333287 010914 03474.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS NORMANDALE RECON 8,308.97 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 333287 010914 05530.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS NORMANDALE RECON 2,714.37 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 333287 010914 04390.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS NORMANDALE RECON 15, 519.76 379185 111612014 133280 O'GARA, LAURIE 100.00 SR CTR NEWSLETTER AD SALES 333110 0002 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 100.00 379186 111612014 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 8,200.00 2014 WARRANTY RENEWAL 333288 2416 5720.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8,200.00 379187 1116/2014 130803 PARKER, MARILYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/30/14 333255 010114 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 379188 1116/2014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 3,656.59 333144 8432013 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,940.27 333398 8432023 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 133.25 333399 8432027 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,730.11 379189 1116/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 125.25 333060 18289383 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 85.96 333289 18609573 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 384.02 333290 16609588 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS100 10,583.24 CITY OF EDINA 333400 2543236 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by GL 1,249.16 333401 2543234 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register and Summary 2,420.83 333402 2543235 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379189 111612014 VERNON SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued... 521.41 333291 08545270 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1116/2014 1,116.64 379190 1116/2014 122417 PETTY CASH AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003727 333201 114077445 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 25.00 PETTY CASH 333292 010914 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.16 PETTY CASH 333292 010914 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/1612014 57.16 379191 111612014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 333358 011014 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page - 19 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PSTF OCCUPANCY PUBLIC PROGRAMS 10,583.24 333400 2543236 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,249.16 333401 2543234 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,420.83 333402 2543235 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 333403 2543225 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 14,255.47 379192 1116/2014 100953 PHYSIO - CONTROL INC. 97.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003727 333201 114077445 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 97.20 379193 1/1612014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 333358 011014 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 379194 1116/2014 106152 POWERPLAN 44.42 THERMOSTAT, SEAL 333293 P09437 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.42 379195 111612014 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 49.91- CREDIT 333202 CM200- 0000040 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 UNLIMITED DATA PLAN 333203 IN200- 1000979 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.09 379196 1/1612014 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 580.22 GLOVES 333204 52135 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 580.22 379197 1/1612014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 250.09 BLADE SHARPENING 333335 268276 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 250.09 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379198 1/1612014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 690.88 GLOVES, WASTE CONTAINERS 00002257 333061 6680 5720.6406 232.93 SPONGES, TISSUE, LINERS 00002263 333062 6683 5720.6406 3,991.35 PLATES, CUTLERY SETS, CUPS 00002275 333063 6701 5720.5510 416.61 LINERS, TISSUE 00002276 333064 6699 5720.6406 504.57 GLOVES, TOWELS, LINERS 00002270 333065 6693 5720.6406 94.29 CONCESSION CUPS 00002276 333066 6700 5730.5510 891.41 HOT /COLD CUPS 00002250 333067 6659 5730.5510 6,822.04 379199 1/1612014 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 8,000.00 GOLF DOME SECURITY CAMERA 333336 64816 5210.6230 8,000.00 379200 1/1612014 133492 PYLES, RICHARD 1,415.60 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 333235 010914 1470.4329 1,415.60 379201 111612014 133485 REID, JENNIFER - 87.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 333111 6300 VIRGINIA 5900.2015 87.88 379202 1/1612014 133475 REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICE CONST 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -4524 RUTLEDGE 333068 ED127267 1495.4109 2,500.00 379203 111612014., 133200 RIDGE CREEK CUSTOM HOMES 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -4200 ALDEN DR 333069 ED127003 1495.4109 2,500.00 379204 1/16/2014 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 605.11 GLASS REPAIR 333205 69194 1553.6530 605.11 379205 1/16/2014 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 15.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 333112 010314 1301.6201 15.00 379206 111612014 100960 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 82.08 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 333206 00287801 1470.6406 82.08 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page - 20 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379206 1/1612014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. Continued... 379207 1/1612014 133489 ROLLNRACK LLC 1,740.00 HOSE ROLLER 00003733 333207 13142 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,740.00 379208 1116/2014 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 272.00 DUES - SCOTT NEAL 333113 2271 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 326.00 DUES - JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 333114 2297 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 596.00 379209 1116/2014 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 333208 R000023674 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 379210 1/1612014 133503 SALTZSTEIN, GEOFFREY 424.59 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 333294 011014 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 424.59 379211 1/1612014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 74.67 FRUIT 333371 ACCOUNT # 9350 1600.4390.56 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 17.98 BATTERIES 333371 ACCOUNT # 9350 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 92.65 379212 1/16/2014 - 133188 SATHER DESIGN/BUILD 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -5721 EWING AVE 333070 ED126763 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379213 111612014 132076 SCHERBER CO. 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -5112 INDIANOLA 333071 ED128053 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379214 111612014 120302 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 24.66 DRYWALL PRIMER 00001286 333209 5117 -1 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 24.66 379215 111612014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 288.56 ACROBAT 00004383 333072 801570093 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 191.31 ACROBAT FOR IT 333372 801569844 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 287.50 ACROBAT 333373 B01569946 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 287.49 ACROBAT 333373 801569946 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379215 1116/2014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Continued... 1,054.86 379216 1/1612014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,648.75 333145 1117898 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,935.50 333146 1117899 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,935.50 333147 1117900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,929.00 333148 1119252 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,672.75 333149 1119254 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,522.22 333150 1119253 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,011.18 333404 1119255 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 705.30 333405 1119250 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 25,360.20 379217 1/16/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 631.34 TUBING 00001380 333295. S2844526.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 44.10- CREDIT 333337 52829003.002 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 587.24 379218 1/16/2014 133506 SPYGLASS 2,714.76 PHONE PROTECTION SERVICE 333338 5580 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,714.76 379219 1/1612014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 869.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADVERTISING 333243 123113 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 869.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADVERTISING 333243 123113 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 869.32 EDINA LIQUOR ADVERTISING 333243 123113 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,608.00 379220 1/16/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 172.90 493121 RENEWAL 333296 011314 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 172.90 379221 111612014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 205.75 333151 2398 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 205.75 379222 111612014 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 424.88 SALTER /PLOW PARTS 00001343 333073 28795 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 424.88 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379223 1/1612014 122290 STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LTD Continued... 5,988.00 E911 CADSERVER 333297 SVC149345 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 5,988.00 379224 1/16/2014 101015 STREICHERS 146.39 UNIFORM SHIRT CARRIER 333115 11062499 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 TRAUMA PLATE 333210 11061555 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 43.81 TACTICAL POUCH 00003027 333211 11062016 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 67.37 BOONIE HATS, BUFFER TUBE 333212 11063694 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.77 PISTOL SAFE 333213 11065566 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,437.47 TRAINING ROUNDS 333214 11065559 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 308.69 TRAINING MAGS 333215 11065571 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 406.11 BALLISTIC HELMET 333244 11063637 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 2,548.61 379225 1116/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 228.09 SHIELD, SUPPORT 00005811 333216 1516094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.98 ARM 00005816 333217 1517448 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 302.07 379226 111612014 101756 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 646.80 PRELIM SURVEY - HOOTEN 333218 45673 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 646.80 379227 111612014 105441 SUSA 125.00 GARY WELLS 333116 2014 MEMBERSHIP 5913.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DISTRIBUTION 125.00 DAVE GOERGEN 333116 2014 MEMBERSHIP 5913.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DISTRIBUTION 250.00 379228 1116/2014 133144 TEDDY BEAR BAND 250.00 EP PERFORMANCE 1/23/14 333253 010114 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00 379229 111612014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,779.85 333406 798370 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.65 333407 798369 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 15.35- 333408 798371 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,820.15 379230 1116/2014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 482.78 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 333298 3000845754 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/1412014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register and Summary 1/1612014 — 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379230 1/1612014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. Continued... 482.78 379231 111612014 104347 71ERNEY BROTHERS INC. 1,063.59 PROJECTOR 333340 435383 -1 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,063.59 379232 1116/2014 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 1,590.00 FITNESS TRAINING 333219 EFD— NOV2013 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,650.00 FITNESS TRAINING 333220 EFD— DEC2013 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,240.00 379233 1116/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 1,092.00 GOLF DOME AD 333299 2014 - 116007 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,092.00 379234 1/16/2014 132615 TIMBERLAND HOMES AND REMODELING 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -4620 58TH ST 333074 ED127549 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379235 1116/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 160.95 VET MEM MEETING MINUTES 333341 M20248 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 160.95 ART COMM MEETING 333342 M20247 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 321.90 379236 1116/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 81.76 GAS STRUT 00005941 333075 2845705 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.44 LAMP 00005899 333300 2880139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,200.00 SWITCH 00005818 333301 2880136 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,422.20 379237 1116/2014 101474 TITLEIST 30.50 GOLF BALLS 333343 2258886 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 42.26 GOLF BALLS 333344 2259698 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 72.76 379238 1116/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 103.20 333152 479480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 103.20 379239 1/16/2014 120595 T MOBILE R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014'11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 379239 111612014 120595 T- MOBILE Continued... 32.61 ENGINEERING PHONE - 333339 477067848 -12/13 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 164.98 PD SQUAD PHONE- 333339 477067848 -12/13 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 197.59 379240 1116/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 31.53 WELDING CYLINDERS 333302 40001529 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ` 31.53 379241 1116/2014 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 80.16 SIGNAL HEAD 0000143.4 333076 63305 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 80.16 379242 .1/16/2014 116535 TRAVELERS 647.50 DEDUCTIBLE 333221 _453516 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL' 980.00 DEDUCTIBLE 333222 453118 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES: GENERAL' 1,732.50 DEDUCTIBLE 333223 453517 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,360.00 379243 111612014 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATION_AL HEALTH PC 270.00 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 333077 102155988 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 270.00 379244 1/16/2014 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 192.37 ADJUST DOOR 333224 406771 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.37 379245 1116/2014 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 294.17 DOOR CLOSER 00001311' 333252 617397 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES, ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 554.79 DOOR REPAIR 833345 622879 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS -ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS - 848.96 379246 111612014 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 333303: 010314 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - _ CONTINGENCIES 17.90 379247 1116/2014 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 3,314.69 UNIFORMS 333225 123113 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL -, 549.34 UNIFORMS 333225 123113 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,943.69 UNIFORMS 333225 123113 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 3,200.91 UNIFORMS 333225 123113 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF.EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register and Summary 1/1612014 — 1/16/2014 Check# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379247 1116/2014 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Continued... 52.99 UNIFORMS 333225 123113 1430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE BIKE PATROL 9,061.62 .,, 379248 111612014 - 125032 UNI.SELECTUSA 193.30 AUTO PARTS 333374 123113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 193.30 379249 111612014 120839 UNITE_ D FIRE FIGHTER ASSOCIATION 30.00 2014 DUES 333304 2014 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 379250 1116/2014 101908 US FOODS 676.30 WASTE RECEPTACLES 333346 123113 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES - GOLF DOME PROGRAM 20.28 DUSTPAN 333346 123113 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 696.58 - 379251 1116/2014 100050 USPS 4,000.00 ACCT# 03620836 333305 010814 - 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 4,000.00 379252 111612014 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 7,832.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001386 333375 19618- 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 7,832.00 379253 1/1612014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 290.15 TRANSFORMER 00001449 333078 7939692 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 583.04' LIGHTING 00001416. 333226 7909151 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY . 167.08 PARTS 00001828 333227 7570860 1646,6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES- BUILDING MAINTENANCE 49.45 PARTS 333228 7570877 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,089.72 379254 111612014` 119454 VINOCOPIA 162.75 - - 333409 0090892 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR ;. VERNON SELLING 16.00 333409 0090892 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON.SELLING 1,111.00 333410 0090891 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,289.75 379255 1/1612014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 577.65. CONCESSION PRODUCT 333306 38469182 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS - 70.387 CREDIT 333307 38465834 5526.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/16/2014 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379255 1116/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 24.97- CREDIT 333308 38465940 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 482.30 379256 1/16/2014 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 91.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 333309 010614 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.97 379257 1116/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 73.38 LIGHTS 00001438 333229 15238028 -00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 73.38 379258 1/16/2014 122059 WASHINGTON COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVICES 3,636.32 INFRASTRUCTURE/RADIO COSTS 333117 77810 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,636.32 379259 111612014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 232.22 333118 010114 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 485.42 333118 010114 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 485.42 333118 010114 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 80.37 333118 010114 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.57 333118 010114 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 65.75 333118 010114 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 101.43 333118 010114 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 56.50 333118 010114 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 180.12 333118 010114 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 274.14 333118 010114 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 230.01 333118 010114 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 493.34 333118 010114 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,100.22 333118 010114 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 64.27 333118 010114 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 90.71 333118 010114 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 3,979.49 379260 111612014 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 226.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT- 2013 333230 010214 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 226.00 379261 1/1612014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 685.90 333153 350452 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.217.13 333411 350442 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register and Summary 1/16/2014 - 1116/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379261 1116/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 1,903.03 379262 1/1612014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 307.36 333154 486682 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 823.84 333412 487277 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 74.45 333413 487274 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,205.65 379263 1/16/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 406.76 333155 1080130127 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14,254.07 333156 1080130125 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,489.63 333157 1080128768 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 94.30 333158 1080128769 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,259.70 333159 1080128767 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 216.60 333414 1080130002 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,361.98 333415 1080130001 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,618.90 333416 1080130124 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,200.22 333417 1080130000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29,902.16 379264 1116/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 2,549.00 333160, 1090163719 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 259.80 333161 1090163720 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,826.95 333162 1090162814 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.00 333163 1090162815 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,196.55 333164 1090162816 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,887.30 379265 1/16/2014 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 5,986.50 HAZELTON RD FINAL DESIGN 333079 6- 01686 -460 01417.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 2,417.75 STATE AID TRAFFIC COUNTS 333080 3- 01686 -480 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION 1,060.50 2013 MS4 PROGRAM ASSISTANCE 333081 4-02092 -650 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 714.00 BYERLY'S UTILITY OBSERVATION 333082 4 -01686 -470 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 395.00 FRANCE AVE PIED CROSSING 333083 19- 01686 -300 01404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 10,573.75 379266 1/1612014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 889.82 51- 4159265 -8 333084 395375189 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,502.21 51- 0837548 -4 333085 396192830 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 1,195.65 51- 6229265 -9 333086 395771260 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date 379266 1/16/2014 Amount Supplier / Explanation 101726 XCEL ENERGY 243.32 51- 6229265 -9 358,97 51- 5634814 -2 9.97 51- 4151897 -6 25.45 51- 7567037 -0 1,215.14 51- 4966303 -6 990.95 51- 6979948 -4 773.81 51- 6979948 -4 607.24 51- 6979948 -4 633.60 51- 5107681 -4 12,318.87 51- 4888627 -1 2,226.70 51- 6840050 -6 25,991.70 379267 1/1612014 102500 7JMMERMAN, TIM 24.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 24.99 867,668.87 Grand Total PO # 333310 010614 1646.6201 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 867,668.87 Total Payments 867,668.87 LAUNDRY 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page - 29 Business Unit YORK FIRE STATION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TRAFFIC SIGNALS YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 1116/2014 — 1116/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No 333086 395771260 1481.6185 333087 396155352 1322.6185 333088 396087404 1646.6185 333089 396135114 1321.6185 333090 395938452 1330.6185 333091 396132169 5841.6185 333091 396132169 5861.6185 333091 396132169 5821.6185 333347 395388222 5111.6185 333348 395935245 5511.6185 333349 396630004 5921.6185 333310 010614 1646.6201 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 867,668.87 Total Payments 867,668.87 LAUNDRY 1/14/2014 11:23:15 Page - 29 Business Unit YORK FIRE STATION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TRAFFIC SIGNALS YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 1/16/2014 - 1/1612014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 268,619.78 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 21,345.60 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 2,615.50 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 152,526.33 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 23,385.32 05100 ART CENTER FUND 903.61 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 9,240.44 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 2,137.35 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 25,628.53 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 77,099.75 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,626.86 05800 LIQUOR FUND 154,682.08 05900 UTILITY FUND 55,966.88 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 29,558.13 05950 RECYCLING FUND 34,192.80 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,723.11 09232 CENTENNIAL TIFDISTRICT 1,416.80 Report Totals 867,668.87 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the. requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po I' j le $ and procedure I to 1/14/2014 11:23:21 Page - 1 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL O1 1888 Agenda Item #- IV. C. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Interim City Engineer Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -13 Requesting Variance From Standards for State Aid Operation for W. 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue Action Requested: Review and approve the attached resolution authorizing staff and consultant to pursue a variance from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Variance Committee for a variance on minimum lane widths in order to continue the use of advisory bike lane pavement markings on W. 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue. Information / Background: Currently, W. 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue is marked with advisory bike lanes as part of the Edina Bike Boulevard Project which was completed in 2012; however, because W. 54th Street is being reconstructed in 2014 the City is required to gather two approvals for their continued use. A variance is required from MSA for on -road bicycle facilities to allow a 12 -ft wide outside lane in lieu of a 14 -ft wide outside lane. The existing section contains two 5 -ft advisory bike lanes and a 14 -ft shared center area for a total of 24 -ft or 12 -ft for each wide outside lane. Since advisory bike lanes are not officially included in the MN Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices they are still considered experimental. Staff is drafting a letter to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) seeking permission to continue the use of the advisory bike lane pavement markings for as long as the City sees fit. Our discussion with various officials lends us to believe this should only be a formality to get approval to continue their use. Please recall that you reviewed and approved reconstruction of W. 54th Street on Dec. 10, 2013. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -13 G:U WICENTRAL SVCS\ENG DMPROJECTSXCONTRACTSU0141ENG 14.6 54th St & BrldgelADMINWISC\Itenn IV. C. Resolution No. 2014 -13 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -13 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR:STATE AID OPERATIONS 5&h STREET WEST — MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD TO FRANCE AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer is hereby authorized to request a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation' State Aid 'Operations, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.3300 and 8820.9941, as they apply to the proposed advisory bike lane pavement markings associated with the reconstruction of 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue, State Aid Project 120 -142- 003, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 require a minimum 14 -foot Wide Outside Lane; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 as applicable to the proposed advisory bike lane pavement markings associated with the reconstruction of 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue, create an undue hardship; and WHEREAS, said hardship has been: in successful operation since the fall 2012 as part the Edina Bike Boulevard — Phase 1 Project, SP 120 - 091 -002, Federal Project No. NMTP 2712 (240); and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby requests a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820.9941, Minimum Design Standards: On -Road Bicycle Facility for Urban; New or Reconstruction Projects to allow a 12 -foot Wide Outside Lane in lieu of a 14 -foot Wide Outside Lane in order for the City to continue use of advisory bike lane pavement markings as they currently exist along 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue.. . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby indemnifies, saves..and': a w91��1� o e •'�roReoxA.V • ,8881 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. D From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -14 Cooperative Local Bike and Pedestrian Connection Agreement with Three Rivers Park District Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -14 authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign attached agreement with Three Rivers Park District for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Cooperative Local Bike and Pedestrian Connection Agreement. Information / Background: This agreement is for the 'On- Ramps' to the Regional Trail System Three Rivers Park District Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Funding for 2017. This agreement is needed for the Three Rivers Park District to coordinate and fund the TAP grant, and to design and construct the South Cornelia connection to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail if the TAP funds are received. The City is required to fund the required 20 percent local match in 2017. Edina Transportation Commission (ETC): Because the Three Rivers Park District solicitation went out after the ETC's December 19 meeting and responses were due on January 3, time did not allow for the ETC to review the proposals. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014 -14 • Cooperative Local Bike and Pedestrian Connection Agreement • Proposal for South Cornelia (Oaklawn Ave.) connection to future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail GAMUNFRAMAGENCIESUHREE RIVERS PARK DISTRIC RTAPUtem IV. D. Resolution No. 2014.14 Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park Distrlctdocx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -14 APPROVING CITY OF EDINA AND THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT NINE -MILE REGIONAL.TRAIL COOPERATIVE LOCAL BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina and Three Rivers Park District approved a corridor route for the regional trail in 2010 and 2011, respectively; and WHEREAS, federal Transportation Alternatives Program funds may be available to assist . local communities with bike and pedestrian projects which provide direct, safe and multi -use access to the regional trail systems; and WHEREAS, the City submitted a proposal to construct a new trail connection to the future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail from Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Mayor James B. Hovland and City Manager Scott H. Neal, are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a cooperative agreement with the Three Rivers Park District for local bike and pedestrian connections to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Dated: January 21, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor .CERTIFICATE.OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 a 1 r COOPERATIVE LOCAL BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AGREEMENT This cooperative agreement is between Three Rivers Park District, a Minnesota political subdivision ( "Park District ") and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "). WHEREAS, federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds may be available to assist local communities with bike and pedestrian projects which provide direct, safe, and multi -use access to the regional trail system, and WHEREAS, Park District is coordinating a multi - jurisdictional application to utilize 2017 TAP funds, and WHEREAS, Park District solicited and is bundling the most competitive proposals from interested cities /agencies into a single grant application, and WHEREAS, City submitted a proposal to construct a new trail connection to the future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail from Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue, and WHEREAS, Park District intends to include the City's proposal within the TAP grant application, and WHEREAS, it is expected that the federal TAP grant would fund 80 percent but not more than one million dollars for construction and land acquisition costs of the bundled proposals, and WHEREAS, Park District and City agree to cooperate to apply for these TAP funds and, if successful in their efforts, agree to cooperate on the funding, design, construction, and associated work items of the City's proposed project, and IT IS HEREBY AGREED, by City and Park District as follows: Park District will: a. bundle the most competitive, feasible, and geographically dispersed proposals totaling up to $1.25 million from interested cities /agencies into a single coordinated grant application, and b. coordinate and fund the application for the TAP grant, -and C. design and construct the City proposed project and coordinate and fund reasonable non -grant eligible expenses including design and construction administration, if the TAP funds are received. 2. City will: a. execute and forward this Agreement to the Park District by January 28, 2014, and b. provide all necessary property rights to complete the project where the City has rights to do so, and -1- 1 C. approve necessary measures by the Park District to secure any additional property rights needed to complete the City proposed project, and d. fund the required 20 percent local match in 2017, if the TAP funds are received. 3. Each party will: a. make staff and other resources available to meet project requirements and deadlines, b. operate, maintain, and assume all liabilities of the portion of the project located on lands controlled by each respective party, and enter into subsequent reasonable agreements as may be required to complete the project, and d. terminate this Agreement if the TAP grant application is unsuccessful. 4. The Park District reserves the right to terminate this Agreement if factors outside the control of the Park District result in the reasonable feasibility of one or more of the bundled projects resulting in the loss of TAP funds. -2- Its Superintendent And Secretary to the Board -3- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of and Park District have entered into this. cooperative agreement as of the date and. year signed below. City.of a Minnesota municipal corporation Date: By: Its Mayor Date: By: Its City Administrator , Three Rivers Park District, a public corporation and political subdivision of the state of Minnesota Date: By: Its Chair - Board of Commissioners Date: - By: Its Superintendent And Secretary to the Board -3- 'On Ramps' to the Regional Trail System Proposal Form Proposal Forms are due by 5:00 PM on January 3, 2014. Proposals may be emailed, mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to: Kelly Grissman, Director of Planning Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 763 - 559 -3287 (fax) kgrissman @threeriversparkdistrict.org .1 hreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Proposal Considerations Project must meet TAP Criteria for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. http: / /www.metrocounciI.org/ Transportation /Planning /Regional- Solicitation.aspx Project must provide or improve a direct, safe, and multi -use access to Three Rivers' regional trail system. Project must be part of approved local, regional, or state plan /policy /similar. Project cannot be mitigation for another project. Projects that 'score' well under the TAP Bicycle and Pedestrian Category and coincide with the TAP prioritization criteria, provide geographic balance, are cost effective, easy to implement, address a key safety concern, serve the greatest number of people, and demonstrate a greater level of maturity' may be prioritized. There is no minimum /maximum project cost; however, the intent is to bundle several projects together for a total construction cost between $100,000 and $1,250,000. Proposal Information Please complete the following questions based off of the TAP application. Applicants are encouraged to keep answers concise. Bullets, paraphrasing, lists, etc. are acceptable as long as the response provides the requested information and is clearly understood. This form is intended to take two hours or less to complete. 1. Project Description Proposal Name: South Cornelia Connection Location: Oaklawn Ave and Parklawn Ave, Edina, Hennepin County Regional Trail connecting to: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Briefly describe the project and intended user of the proposed facility. How does the project fill gaps, overcome barriers, connect system segments, or similar? What destinations does the proposal ultimately connect to? Are there safety, implications of the project? This proposal is for a new 250' long, 10' wide .multi -use trail ( "park pathway ") connecting the Regional Trail to the South Cornelia neighborhood in southeast Edina. This project would serve as the only direct access to the regional trail from this neighborhood, whose border is located only 100' north 4 of the trail. Additionally, this connection would give access to Cornelia School to the north to project - area residents and trail users. List or summarize the need /benefit /estimated use of the project. - Recommended as a trail connection in Edina's Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan - Provides a non - motorized connection for Parklawn neighborhood, higher- density residents to Cornelia School, located less than one -half mile to the north of the regional trail. 2. Challenges /Opportunities List or briefly describe items that demonstrate the feasibility /complexity of the project and /or may result in a more /less complex project (right -of -way secured /not secured, steep grade /level, wetlands, cultural resources, ability to meet MN State 'Aid Standards, political /public support, etc.). - Recommended as a trail connection in Edina's Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan - 30' City -owned drainage easement currently exists at this location 3. Right- of- Way/Third Party Coordination Is additional right -of -way or coordination with a railroad, MnDOT, county, watershed district, or similar required to complete the project? Yes ❑ 7 no F3 If yes, describe extent and status. Click here to enter text. 4. Estimated Project Cost $0 Right -of -way $53,000 Construction $0 Other (Describe: Click here to enter text.) $53,000 Total Describe accuracy of cost estimate (appraisal, ballpark, engineer's estimate, similar project, etc.). - Engineer's estimate based on unit costs from similar projects. Includes mobilization, 20% contingency and 15% for engineering /clerical. 5. Consistency and Status What approved plan(s), policy(ies) or similar include this project? - Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan - Living Streets Policy What is the status of the project (e.g. shown on a plan, conceptual layout complete, preliminary engineering underway, etc.). - For this segment, no work has been completed. The project is a primary recommendation in Edina's Active Routes to School Plan. 6. Competitiveness Briefly describe the urgency /significance of the project. Click here to enter text. List specific multimodal transportation benefits of this project (no need to describe 'typical' benefits of connectively with the regional trail system and the destinations along regional trails). For example, does this project directly connect to a mixed -use pedestrian- oriented district, transit route, park and ride, etc? Click here to enter text. Any other noteworthy information to share? - The City of Edina recently implemented the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund, which is funded by utility franchise fees. The PACS Fund budget is currently approximately $1.1 million and is used exclusively for improvements to the City's non - monotized transportation system. This is an opportunity to leverage these funds. 7. Cooperative Agreement Is the applicant able to provide the required Cooperative Agreement by 5 p.m. January 28, 2014? Yes No ❑ If no, please describe why and propose an alternative solution. Click here to enter text. 8. Map and Photos Please attach a project map. Include /label scale bar, north arrow, regional trail, adjacent roads, property lines, and proposed connection. Map may be hand drawn as long as it clearly illustrates the proposed project. Applicants may also attach photos. Oaklawn Avenue - Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue 491��r4 -- Existing Bituminous Sidewalk mom° Proposed Busin esslPark/School Sidewalk �� e / m — Existing Concrete Sidewalk Proposed Sidewalk on Roads Classified Collector 6 Above V dy — Existing Park Pathway Proposed State -Aid Sidewalk '�. DI7C Proposed Regional Trail N W +E S Engineering Dept 7320 -. 31`9 7329 �0 . "?i � 0 7333 7324 M. M M (D 00 C M N 425 4421 417 413 409 405 4401 X33 N M <� c�i M M M M M M 7401 740 0 7401 - 504 4500 O 4.100 - 7405 7404, 7403 0 CD 741 `,: 4250 7408 7409 Proposed t �3p0 2$ r_ =z, Y,.=,:, .� ,.� �__ �Parklawn�Ave,3 -zt _. » >z 5 Oaklawn Ave -r 7411 Connection 7412 " 4251 ' 7417' . 4201 7416 6.' 7421 CO '4351 ` .7501 442!`i 505 4501 7505 " Q _ ._. _ 4145 443$ 4440 4456 4444 4446 t 6THSTW r .... 4448 40 _ - ., �! 4450 _ 4480 4456 I 4452 ` W 76TH ST � - .7636 „ s,:'99 <A A =,� - • ; - 7600 7.625 - 4451 =-1 ;yi t . 4401 4550 453.0_ h , 7685 4570 - 4600 +: gA "4510- E _ 7725 W 77TH ST Oaklawn Avenue - Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue 491��r4 -- Existing Bituminous Sidewalk mom° Proposed Busin esslPark/School Sidewalk �� e / m — Existing Concrete Sidewalk Proposed Sidewalk on Roads Classified Collector 6 Above V dy — Existing Park Pathway Proposed State -Aid Sidewalk '�. DI7C Proposed Regional Trail N W +E S Engineering Dept • n 1 ®�� 6 Sy ' 4� t c. 3! 9 T . 4A .CYST, p �Tr .. _ 1320. RA, 0 � x'27'/3 l x } To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: January 21, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Report, December 4, 2013 •'��nRt'ORATFO • IHHH Agenda Item #: IV. E. Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 4, 2013. Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the December 4, 2013, Traffic Safety Committee Report at their December 19 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval, see attached draft minutes. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 4, 2013 Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of December 19, 2013 G: \Engineeringllnfnstructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffc Safety Committee \City Council Reports\2013 \Item IV. E. Traffic Safety Report of December 4, 2013.docx City of Edina = 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, December 4, 2013 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 4. The Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Police Traffic Supervisor, and Traffic Safety Coordinator were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the December 19 Edina Transportation Commission and the January 21 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request for No Parking on one side of Wooddale Avenue south of Garrison Lane, Garrison Lane, and on Nancy Lane. This request comes from a resident who lives at the intersection of Garrison Lane and Wooddale Avenue. The requestor states large vehicles and cars park along Garrison and Wooddale / Nancy Lane, visibility and access are issues. The resident would like to have no parking on one side of Garrison, no parking on Wooddale south of Garrison and no parking on Nancy Lane. Measurements were taken of the road widths; Garrison Lane 31.5 ft. back of curb to back of curb, Nancy Lane 30.5 ft., Wooddale Ave. south of Garrison 21.5 ft. Neither Nancy Lane nor Wooddale Ave. have curb. Wooddale Avenue is a bike route. �F w IP ry a Map: Wooddale Ave at Garrison and Nancy Ln There are no reported crashes at the intersection of Garrison Lane and Wooddale Avenue, and none on Nancy Lane. Staff recommends approval of No Parking on the east side of Wooddale Avenue south of Garrison Lane. Staff recommends denying the request for No Parking on Garrison Lane and Nancy Lane. Page 1 of 11 Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 k Picture: Nancy Lane and Wooddale Ave. facing north CrrTlrKI R• Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: B1. Request for a four -way stop at the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Brook Drive. This request comes from a resident who lives near the intersection. The requestor states that the intersection is "dangerous" for pedestrians due to vehicles speeding through the intersection. Requestor would like to see a four -way stop at the intersection as well as speed counts on Tracy Avenue. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MNMUTCD) has guidelines that the City of Edina uses. The guideline states: Map: Tracy Avenue and Brook Drive The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi -way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi -way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Page 2 of 11 J B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right -turn and left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, Photo: Tracy Avenue and Brook Drive looking west pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest peak hour, but z� 3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major- street ` exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are _ +: 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is ~_ _ satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Photo: Tracy Avenue and Brook Drive looking Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left -turn conflicts, B. The need to control vehicle /pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes, C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi -way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. Page 3 of 11 Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 IL Traffic counts and pedestrian counts were conducted at this intersection. This intersection has an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 1565 vehicles entering. A total of 32 pedestrians and 2 cyclists entered the intersection during that time. 1599 total intersection volume being below the required 2000. There are no visibility issues at the intersection. There are no recorded crashes at this intersection. A speed count was also done with the 85th percentile speed of 30.65 mph, the posted speed limit is 30 mph. After discussion, staff recommends denying the request, since the intersection did not meet warrants for an four -way stop. B2. Request for stop signs at the intersection of Drew Avenue and Fuller Street. This request comes from a resident who travels this intersection frequently. The requestor states that this intersection is dangerous to pedestrians and motorists because there is no traffic control. Requestor feels that placing a stop sign(s) would increase the safety of the intersection. See map below. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MNMUTCD) has guidelines that the City of Edina uses. The guideline states: In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; Map: Drew Avenue and Fuller Street B. The ability to see conflicting traffic Photo: Drew Ave and Fuller St looking north Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Page 4 of 11 on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right -of -way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary, and /or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right -of -way at the intersection under the normal right -of -way rule have been reported within a 3 -year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. Traffic, pedestrian and bicycle counts were conducted at this intersection. This intersection has an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 406 vehicles and a total of 53 pedestrians and bicycles entering the intersection during that time, for a combined total of 459. There are two recorded crashes at Photo: Drew Ave and Fuller St looking west this intersection (a property damage accident in November, 2007 and a personal injury accident in December 2010). In June 2011 the committee recommended the denial of stop signs at the intersection of Drew Ave. and Fuller St. Staff recommends denying the request, since the intersection did not meet warrants for a stop sign. B3. Request for stop signs at the intersection of Willow Wood Road and Larada Lane. This request comes from a resident who lives at this intersection. The requestor states that vehicles are travelling at a high rate of speed through the intersection on Larada Ln (stop signs exist on Willow Wood Rd on the east and west legs). Requestor feels that placing stop signs on the north and south legs would increase the safety of the intersection. See map below. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MNUTCD) has guidelines that the City of Edina uses. The guideline states: The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi -way STOP sign installation: Page 5 of 11 Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 1 A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi -way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right -turn and left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: Map: Willow Wood Road and Larada Lane 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the some 8 hours, with an average delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle photo: Willow Wood Road and Larada Lane looking north during the highest peak hour, but 3. If the 85`n percentile approach speed of the major- street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left -turn conflicts, B. The need to control vehicle /pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Page 6 of 11 C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi -way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. Traffic, pedestrian and bicycle counts were conducted at this intersection. This intersection has an ADT of 426 vehicles and a total of 36 pedestrians and bicycles entering the intersection during that time, for a combined total of 426. There are no recorded crashes at this intersection. Staff recommends denying the request, since the intersection did not meet warrants for an all - way stop. B4. Request for No Parking on one side of Wycliffe Road north of Grove Street. This request comes from a resident who lives in the area. The requestor states that when vehicles are parked on both sides of Wycliffe Road there is not enough room for two cars to pass each other. Also, the curving nature of the street hinders drivers' ability to see approaching cars between the parked vehicles. There is a church located at the intersection of Wycliffe Road and Grove Street. Requestor would like No Parking on one side of Wycliffe. Currently there is no parking Monday thru Friday from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. on the east side of the street in front of the church property. The road width from back of curb to back of curb is 30.5 ft. Typical residential streets are 31 ft. After discussion the staff recommends denying the request, finding the street wide enough to accommodate parking and traffic. Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Photo: Wycliffe Road looking north Map: Wycliffe Road Page 7 of 11 A k SECTION C: Request that are deferred to a later date: C1. Request for parking restrictions in front of 4215 -4219 Grimes Avenue. This request comes from a resident who lives in the area and often travels through this section of Grimes Avenue. Requestor states that vehicles travelling northbound on Grimes have to swerve around vehicles parked on the east side of the street, potentially ending up in the southbound lane. Requestor states that this section of Grimes (4215 -4219) is on a hill which could potentially block sightlines of vehicles. Requestor would like parking restrictions on the east side of Grimes near these addresses. Currently there is no parking allowed on the west side of the street. Pavement at this location is 25.5' (face to face). In 2005 a traffic count was taken. The ADT was 806 vehicles with an 85`h percentile speed of 31.3 mph. The calculated Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) based on the MNDOT road design manual; for this section of Grimes with a 30 mph speed limit and a grade of 14 percent is 171.7 ft. The measured SSD was 172 ft. Map: 4200 block of Grimes Ave After discussion staff recommends doing more research on nearby similar streets for comparison, and to research how this compares with the Living Streets policy. Photo: 4213 Grimes Ave, looking south C2. Request is for replacing the yield signs at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and Garrison Lane with Stop signs. This request comes from a resident living near the intersection. Requestor states vehicles crossing St. Johns Avenue are being hit by people going too fast down St. Johns. Also, the Yield signs on Garrison and Ashcroft Lanes are hard to see and are not being observed. Currently there are Yield signs for traffic crossing St. Johns Avenue. Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Page 8 of 11 J In 2000 a traffic count was completed for St. Johns Avenue north of Garrison resulting in an ADT of 101, and an 85th percentile speed of 26.9 mph. In 2004 a traffic count was completed for Garrison Lane east of St. Johns resulting in an ADT of 212 and an 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. There are two recorded auto crashes; a crash resulting in property damage in 2002, and a crash resulting in personal injury in 2013. After discussion, the staff recommends looking further into the crash from 2013 to see if it was an unavoidable crash. Photo: St. Johns Ave. looking south Photo: St. Johns Ave. and Garrison Ln. looking west C3. Request for painted crosswalks at the intersection of Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue. This request comes from a resident who lives in the area. The requestor states that vehicles are not stopping for pedestrians at the intersection of Grimes Avenue and Sunnyside Road. There is a Stop sign on southbound Grimes at Sunnyside. There is a Stop sign on Sunnyside at Arden. There are no other Stop signs on Sunnyside between Arden and France Avenue. There is a marked crosswalk on Sunnyside at Arden. Curb ramps exists for crosswalks as shown in the picture. There are no other marked crosswalks between Arden and France Avenue. There are no recorded crashes at the intersection. The criterion for placement of crosswalks and type of control is outlined within the City of Edina Local Traffic Control list. It states: Page 9 of 11 Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Marked Pedestrian Crosswalk • Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. • Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight hour period. • Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time ". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: Photo: Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue • More than five gaps — pavement marking and signage only. • Four to five gaps — add activated pedestal mounted flasher. • Less than three gaps — add activated overhead mounted flasher Counts of pedestrians were taken at the intersection. A maximum total of 7 pedestrians were recorded crossing Sunnyside Road and a maximum total of 7 pedestrians crossing Grimes Avenue at the intersection within a two -hour period. This is below the warrants for placing a crosswalk. for an All -Way stop sign at this intersection on August 1, 2012. Photo: Grimes Ave. and Sunnyside Rd looking south The TSC deferred a request After discussion staff recommends denying this request since the intersection did not meet the minimum warrants for pedestrians crossing in a two -hour window. However, after discussion at their December 19 meeting, the ETC recommends looking further into the intersection and the history of related requests there. Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 Page 10 of 11 SECTION D: Other traffic safety - related issues handled. D1. Call from a resident regarding vehicles speeding on Tracy Avenue near 681h Street. Resident would like to see speed enforcement in the area. A recent speed count was forwarded to the Edina Police Department (EPD). D2. Email from a resident stating that sightlines are obstructed at the intersection of 66th Street and Valley View Road. EPD visited the site and determined there was no clear zone violation or obstructed sight lines at the intersection. Email was sent to the resident stating this. EPD sent the property owner a letter as well. Page 11 of 11 Traffic Safety Committee Report December 4, 2013 a DRAFT ETC Minutes.of December 19, 2013 The consensus was to continue the discussion in a series of workshops. Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 4, 2013 Section B -5 will be pulled from the report to verify approval of crosswalks in 2008. Motion was made. by member lyer and seconded by member Bass to forward the December 4 Traffic Safety Report to City Council without Section B -S. All voted aye. Motion carried: Meetina Schedule for 2014 Motion was made by member lyer and seconded by member Whited to approve the 2014 Meeting Schedule. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members - None Bike Edina Task Force Member Janovy handed out a draft document that clarified the relationship between the BETF and the City and asked.for feedback. She said the relationship would be similar to that of a soccer association. After discussion, suggestion was to delete "City Council will continue to appoint a member of BETF to the Edina Transportation Commission" because this is in the ETC's ordinance, and to consider being an association rather than a task force. Living Streets Working Group Transportation planner Nolan said Feed the Dog is finalizing two branding /logo options for presentation to a focus group for feedback. At their last meeting, they discussed design guidelines including street types, typical section, bike facility, etc. Communications Committee - None CORRESPONDENCE AND. PETITIONS - None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Boettge asked if there was a map online that shows upcoming street reconstruction schedule and transportation planner Nolan said yes and that he would email her the link. Member Janovy noted that the City Council approved the 54th Street project on a particular design of the streets but d.id not ordered the project bri the basis of the feasibility study, just in case this needs to be. clarified. Additionally, she suggested that the ETC discuss what will happen with the advisory lanes after the experimental process is over because the Federal Highways is no longer allowing the treatment that is on Valley View Rd (green lanes) and wondered if they would be required to remove them. She said the City Council should be advised on this. Discussion ensued about the need to improve the communication process at all levels because even though there was an engagement process specifically for W. 54th Street it did, not work. Member La Force said the City will not be able to build a transportation network if objectors are successful in stopping a sidewalk in front of their house. A suggestion was to understand people's objections and create messages around them. J Chair Nelson said he's noticed that MnDOT added the auxiliary lane on the west side of 1 -494 but not on the east side. Transportation planner Nolan will check and report back. 2 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Interim City Engineer Y O/nI O O Agenda Item #: IV. F. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: January 21, 2014 Subject: Approve Contract Change Order for Engineering Services for Edina Bike.Blvd Project. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: n/a n/a Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: n/a n/a Recommended Quote or Bid: Approve Contract Change Order for Engineering Services. General Information: As you will recall the City received a-$250,000'grant for a bike boulevard project from the Non - Motorized Transportation Pilot Program with the funds administered through the Transit for Livable Communities. The funds were used to install experimental pavement markings on Valley View Road, Wooddale Avenue and W. 54th Street in 2012, with the understanding that they would be evaluated periodically during the 2 -year timeframe. In Oct. 2013, Alliant Engineering submitted a proposal (attached for reference) for $18,950 for all of the required evaluation reports. Per the City's purchasing policy it was approved by the Engineering Director since it was less than $20,000. Alliant Engineering has.completed and submitted the evaluation report required by December 2013. Since that time, staff has found additional 2012 data associated with the operations that were previously thought to be lost due to staff turnovers. The additional data will require re- analysis by Alliant Engineering at a cost of $3,820. This additional analysis pushes the contract amount over $20,000 from $18,950 to $22,770. Per the City's purchasing policy, City Council approval is required on this contract change order. Attachment: • Approved Alliant Engineering Contract G:IWVICENTRAL SVCS\ENG 0I1APROf ECTS\CONTRACTSUOI ZENG 12-6 Bike Blvd (TLC)WDMIN MISC%Itenn IV. F. Change Order for Eng Svcs.dooc I. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 October 24, 2013 Mr. Michael R. Anderson, PE, PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer Alliant Engineering, Inc. 233 Park Ave Si Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55414-1108 RE: Approval of Proposal for FHWA Experiment Evaluation — Wooddale Avenue, 54th St and Valley View Rd Dear Mr. Anderson: The City of Edina approves the attached proposal ($18,950) for the above work. Please coordinate this project with Mark Nolan — Edina Transportation Planner. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Engineering Enclosure C: Mark Nolan — Edina Transportation Planner Chad Millner — Assistant City Engineer G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\ PROJECTS \CONTRACiS%*W 9 eBTv3'l �0_ UCTION \20131024 W H-Edlna to MA A1I16nt.doc 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 -Fax 952 =826 -0392 r " Alliant Engineering, Inc. October 7, 2013 Mr. Mark Nolan, AICP 'City Transportation`Planner City of Edina - Public Works 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 RE: Proposal for FHWA Experiment Evaluation — Wooddale Avenue, 54`h Street and Valley View Road Dear Mr. Nolan: Alliant Engineering is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for the evaluation of the Wooddale Avenue, 54.x' Street and Valley View Road experimental treatments. Based on our conversation on October 4, 2013 I have Prepared a brief scope of work and project fee estimate. Attachment A: Scope of Work Attachment B: Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Fee Based on the scope of work, our, project fee estimate is $18,950. Once given authorization4o proceed, we Will schedule the installation of the cameras for the Fall 2013 evaluation period. Schedule The Semi - Annual Evaluation Report summarizing the 2012 through Fall 2013 data will be submitted to FHWA prior to December 31, 2013. The Final Evaluation Report will be submitted to FHWA before December 31, 2014. We look forward'to continuing our working relationship with the City of Edina. Sincerely, Alliant Engineering, Inc. Michael R. Anderson, PE, PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer 612 - 767 -9340 (direct) 612 - 758 -3098 (fax) manderson @alliant- inc.com 233 Park Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis Minnesota 55415 -1108 > P Phone 612.758.3080, Fax 612.758.3099 rj Attachment A Scope of Work Page 1 of 4 Task 1.0 Data Collection — Fall 2013 Experiment Evaluation Study Proposal — Wooddale/50 and Valley View Road October 7, 2013 1.1 Tabulate and summarize City collected Summery 2012 (Before) / Fall 2012 (Immediately After) data. Data to be provided by the City of Edina. 1.2 Set and collect video recordings at 4 locations along Wooddale Avenue, 54"' Street and Valley View Road (24 -Hours on a weekday). The locations are: • Wooddale at 55th Street Wooddale at 60a' Street 54th Street at Halifax Avenue • Valley View Road at Kellogg Avenue Note: The video files will be recorded by TDI and delivered to Alliant Engineering, Inc. A direct expense for video recordings will be made. 1.3 Observe videos and tabulate data in accordance with the FHWA experiment guidelines and consistent with previously collected City of Edina data. Data collection will include: • Total number of cyclists; • Number of cyclists riding on the sidewalks; • Number of cyclists riding against traffic; • Speed Study • Volume of motorists; • Crash data; • Position of vehicles and cyclists in the lane; • Driver and bicyclist surveys to determine recognition, comprehension and effectiveness (after study only). — See Alternate Task 5.0 Task 2.0 Data Collection — Spring 2014 2.1 Set and collect video recordings at 4 locations along Wooddale Avenue, 54th Street and Valley View Road (24 -Hours on a weekday). The locations are: • Wooddale at 550i Street Wooddale at 600` Street 54th Street at Halifax Avenue • Valley View Road at Kellogg Avenue Note: The video files will be recorded by TDI and delivered to Alliant Engineering, Inc. A direct expense for video recordings will be made. 2.2 Observe videos and tabulate data in accordance with the FHWA experiment guidelines and consistent with previously collected City of Edina data. Data collection will include: • Total number of cyclists; Alliant Engineering, Inc. r-o J Attachment A Experiment Evaluation Study Proposal — Scope of Work Wooddale/50 and Valley View Road Page'2 of 4 October 7,. 2013 • Number of cyclists riding on the sidewalks; • Number:of cyclists riding against traffic; a Volume of motorists; ® Crash data; o Position of vehicles and cyclists in the lane; Task 3.0 Data Collection — Fall 2014 3.1 Set and collect video recordings at 4 locations along Wooddale Avenue, 54t` Street and Valley View Road (24 -Hours on a weekday). The locations are: • Wooddale at 55th Street • Wooddale at 60a' Street • 54a' Street at Halifax Avenue a Valley View Road at Kellogg Avenue Note: The video files will be recorded by TDI and delivered to Alliant Engineering, Inc. A direct expense for video recordings will be made. 3.2 Observe videos and tabulate data in accordance with the FHWA experiment guidelines and consistent with previously collected City of Edina data. Data collection will include: • Total number'of cyclists (before /after); • Number of cyclists riding on the sidewalks; • Number of cyclists riding against traffic; • Speed Study • Volume of motorists; • Crash data; • Position of vehicles and cyclists in the lane; Task 4.0 Evaluation Reports 4.1 Prepare a draft and final Semi - Annual Evaluation Report summarizing the 2012 through Fall 2013 observation data. 4.2 Prepare a draft and final Final Evaluation Report summarizing the observations, results and conclusions of the experimental treatments. Alternate Task 5.0 Conduct driver and bicyclist intercept survey to determine recognition, comprehension and effectiveness of pavement markings. a Develop postcard and distribute to residents, bicyclists and motorists. Postcard will refer recipient to website to take online survey. Develop online survey questions using www.SurveMme. , Compile and tabulate survey results. Alliant Engineering, Inc. Attachment A Experiment Evaluation Study Proposal — Scope of Work WooddalelMh and Valley View Road Page 3 of 4 October 7, 2013 Alternate Task 6.0 The City had collected video recordings in Spring /Summer 2013. Summary data from these recordings may not be available. If the City provides the video recordings, Alliant will observe and tabulate the data in accordance_ with the items listed in the Tasks 1' -3 above. Alliant Engineering, Inc. Attachment B Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Page 4 of 4 Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Experiment Evaluation Study Proposal — Wooddale/54th and Valley View Road October 7, 2013 Work Task Work Task Project Project Data Manager Engineer Collector TOTAL HOURS ESTIMATED COSTBYTASK M;ke Anderson Ken Levin Project Manager Project Data Engineer Collector TOTAL HOURS Ken levin ESTIMATED COSTBYTASK Mdse Anderson –Intercept Survey . Develop Distribute Postcards LO 2 24 1.0 Data Collection -Fall 2013 Tabulate Stu Results 4 12 16 Summarize Summer (Before) / Fall 2012 Data Provided by Co 2 8 $2,640.00 Observe Videos Assume 16 -hours staffti ne per 24-hour video 2 64 66 Tabulate Data vo a observations crashes 4 8 4 16 4 8 4 SUBTOTAL TASK 1.0 1 6 18 68 82 $4,810.00 rr .. 1 244 . 2.0 Data Collection - Spring 2014 E5 i D;'r 001 Average Hourly Rates i3c`ilnlrarai+ $135 1 $90 $u%�3p Observe Videos Assume 16-hours staffti ne per 24 -hour video S35� 2 64 66 SZ160 Tabulate Data volume observations. crashes 4 8 4 16 SUBTOTAL TASK 2.0 4 10 68 82 $3,820.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL 3.0 Data Collection -Fall 2014 $7,060.00 Observe Videos Assumel6- hours staff time per 24 -hour video 2 64 66 0 - SM06 -0s0 : Tabulate Data volume observations crashes 4 8 4 16 SUBTOTAL TASK 3.0 4 10 68 1 82 $3,820.00 4.0 Evaluation Re part Semi -Amoral Evaluation Report 2013 12 12 Final Evaluation Re — 2014 12 12 24 SUBTOTAL TA SK 4.0 12 12 0 24 $2,700.00 0 Avers a Hourly Rates $135 $90 $35 Estimated Labor $3 510 $4 00 $7140 $15150.00 Videos 4-24H Videos Per Task 70000 Speed S 4-48 Hour Studies — Fafl 2013 0 $100000 Reimbarsables (Mileage, Copying, Deliveries $100.00 SUBTOTAL $18,950.00 D . *_OrS'BS :' $ tea.. K : IMMIRRIj _. . ESTIMATED STA`FF,HOURS AND COSTS = ALTERNATE TASK Work Task Project Project Data Manager Engineer Collector TOTAL HOURS ESTIMATED COSTBYTASK M;ke Anderson Ken Levin –Intercept Survey . Develop Distribute Postcards LO 2 24 26 Tabulate Stu Results 4 12 16 5.0 4 14 24 42 $2,640.00 6.0 Alternate Task — Tabulate Spring 2013 Observe Videos 2 64 66 Tabulate Data (volume, observations, crashes ) 4 8 4 16 SUBTOTAL TASK 6.0 4 10 68 82 $3,820.00 rr .. 1 244 . E5 i D;'r 001 Average Hourly Rates i3c`ilnlrarai+ $135 1 $90 $u%�3p S35� EstinatedLabor $1080 SZ160 I $3,220 $6460,00 SunnWonkey $]00.00 P $500.00 SUBTOTAL $7,060.00 ? O., Y 70=0 0 - SM06 -0s0 : Alliant Engineering, Inc. REPORT w9t� 1 o e En I � less ` To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: IV.G. From: Dave Nelson, Interim Chief of Police Action Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -15 Approving Grant With Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force-for 2013 -2014. Action Requested: Motion adopting Resolution No. 2014 -15 authorizing the Edina Police Department to continue its participation in the MNFCTF and accept State Grant funding for the officer that is participating. Information / Background: The Edina Police Department has received state grant monies to participate in the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force since 2005. The existing grant agreement expired on June 30, 2013. Additional funding is available through June 30, 2014, at a rate of $42,500 per year. We would like to continue our participation due to the increase in identity theft and organized groups involved in fraud activity. The Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force addresses major financial crimes and attempts to coordinate the private sector and law enforcement's response to this crime trend. We have assigned one detective to the Task Force on a full - time basis. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -15. AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS FROM MN BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION WHEREAS, the Edina Police Department is a member of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety has approved the Edina Police Department for grant funds for their participation with the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina has authorized the Edina Police Department to receive funds from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for their participation with the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and Mayor are authorized to execute any necessary agreements relating to the grant with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. Adopted this 21st day of January. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE-OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the. Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meetig. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. City Clerk To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor and City Council tT,IA. Fe , 5, o \�1R1'oR��Y� • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. H. Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Resolution No. 2014- 16, Authorizing An Application To The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development for a Grant to Support The -Redevelopment Of The Pentagon Park Property Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: This DEED grant is anticipated to help initiate the redevelopment of .the southern portion of the 42 -acre Pentagon Park site. The existing six -story office building and its single -story wings (southside of W: 77th Street) will be razed to clear the site.for new development. Preliminary site plan approval.will be sought in February — March 2014 and will include preliminary input provided by the Edina Plan Commission and Edina City Council. The costs of redevelopment are very high and participation by local, regional and state agencies will be necessary to make this ambitious and transformative project feasible. LOCAL MATCH: This DEED grant program requires a local match from the City and /or Developer. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is anticipated to be the source of City funds and the developer will invest a great deal more than the .grant amount. The City initiated the process of creating a Tax Increment Financing District in this area in December 2013. The Public Hearing is scheduled for February 18 with final approvals anticipated in March 2014. ABOUT DEED's REDEVELOPMENT GRANTS: DEED has funding to support job creation through the redevelopment of sites that suffer from obsolescence and high vacancy. This competitive grant program will accept final applications on February 3, 2014. A resolution of support from the City is required as part of the application package. The property owner/ developer believes that this project has a strong chance of receiving funding based on the existing challenges and strong potential for job creation and reinvestment. Approval of this Resolution will allow Pentagon South, LLC (Hillcrest Development) to seek DEED grant funding for the Pentagon Park South project. The City will serve as the grant applicant and a conduit to provide the grant funds to the developer. All out -of- pocket costs related to the grant application are borne by the developer. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -16 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 -o t tT,IA. Fe , 5, o \�1R1'oR��Y� • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. H. Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Resolution No. 2014- 16, Authorizing An Application To The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development for a Grant to Support The -Redevelopment Of The Pentagon Park Property Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: This DEED grant is anticipated to help initiate the redevelopment of .the southern portion of the 42 -acre Pentagon Park site. The existing six -story office building and its single -story wings (southside of W: 77th Street) will be razed to clear the site.for new development. Preliminary site plan approval.will be sought in February — March 2014 and will include preliminary input provided by the Edina Plan Commission and Edina City Council. The costs of redevelopment are very high and participation by local, regional and state agencies will be necessary to make this ambitious and transformative project feasible. LOCAL MATCH: This DEED grant program requires a local match from the City and /or Developer. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is anticipated to be the source of City funds and the developer will invest a great deal more than the .grant amount. The City initiated the process of creating a Tax Increment Financing District in this area in December 2013. The Public Hearing is scheduled for February 18 with final approvals anticipated in March 2014. ABOUT DEED's REDEVELOPMENT GRANTS: DEED has funding to support job creation through the redevelopment of sites that suffer from obsolescence and high vacancy. This competitive grant program will accept final applications on February 3, 2014. A resolution of support from the City is required as part of the application package. The property owner/ developer believes that this project has a strong chance of receiving funding based on the existing challenges and strong potential for job creation and reinvestment. Approval of this Resolution will allow Pentagon South, LLC (Hillcrest Development) to seek DEED grant funding for the Pentagon Park South project. The City will serve as the grant applicant and a conduit to provide the grant funds to the developer. All out -of- pocket costs related to the grant application are borne by the developer. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -16 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 r,. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -16 AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC .DEVELOPMENT FOR A GRANT TO SUPPORT THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PENTAGON PARK PROPERTY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS the City of Edina is a statutory city eligible to apply for grant funding; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development is soliciting requests for grant applications to further redevelopment and employment goals; and WHEREAS the City has identified a project that satisfies the Redevelopment Grant purpose and . criteria; and WHEREAS, the Pentagon Park South site suffers from a lack of investment by previous ownership and an exceptionally high vacancy rate; and WHEREAS, it is apparent that the property's condition and value will continue to decline until it is properly repositioned and that the site appears unable to be returned to a highest and best use without grant assistance. BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina act as the legal sponsor for project contained in the Redevelopment Grant Program to be submitted on February 3, 2014 and that Mayor James B. Hovland is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding.of this project on behalf of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of .Edina has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina is in the process of evaluating the conditions in and around the location of Pentagon Park South and that the likely outcome is confirmation that the area qualifies as a Tax Increment Financing District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina intends to give full consideration to the use of tax increment financing as a tool to provide the required local match so that the redevelopment goals can be achieved. rr BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud,' bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Edina may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for'the above referenced project(s), and that the City of. Edina certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor and the Clerk are. hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 21 st day of January, 2014. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted. by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of January 21, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 1 . To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Brian Olson, Public Works Director Date: - January 21, 2014 !. " l„\ O Le O IHdtt Agenda Item #: IV. I. Action M Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -17 Receiving. Feasibility Report and Setting Public Hearing for Improvements to 50th & France Parking Ramps and Related Streetscape, Improvement. No. P -23 Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -17 receiving feasibility report and setting public hearing for 50t,h & France Improvement No. P -23. Information / Background: The popular 50' and France business district is served by three publicly owned parking ramps in addition to limited surface /street parking and some private_ parking. lots. The ramps vary in age — from 45 to 1.5 years old and are all in need of maintenance and repair to.prolong their service life. In addition to the maintenance needs, a 2011 report from Walker Parking Consultants determined that an additional 140 to 200 parking stalls are needed to serve this vibrant business district. In 2012, the City considered a proposal to expand and - improve the South and Middle Parking Ramps (Improvement Nos. P -21 and P -22). That proposal was ultimately rejected due to the high cost ($1.1.9 million) and extended period of disruption., In summer 2013, the City renewed efforts to address the parking conditions at 50' and France. Kimley -Horn Associates (KHA) was selected as the professional team to coordinate this effort. After months of study and frequent input from the local business community and other stakeholders, KHA has submitted the attached Feasibility Report. This report is based on national best practices and is crafted with direct input from affected property owners, business operators and other stakeholders. This report identifies physical improvements such as repairs and capital improvements to the ramps and related streetscape. The total cost of these repairs and improvements is estimated to be $5,685,000. The report also identifies policy changes that could be considered to better manage the use of the existing ramps. At this time, the report does not specifically provide for additional public parking stalls. Due to the high costs of ramp expansion and limited availability of land, it was felt that the degree of expansion could be re- evaluated after physical repairs, wayfinding improvements and City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 policy changes were implemented. It is likely that the City will consider a public /private initiative in the future to redevelop, available land parcels with commercial space and public parking. This Resolution also sets the date for the Public Hearing on the.Feasibility Report. The consultants will be available at that time to give.an overview of the report and to respond to questions. Based on the direction received at the December 17, ' 201 , 013 City Council work session, this report proposes a shared approach to project funding. Maintenance, repairs and operational improvements are anticipated to be borne by the property owners, using the MN Chapter 429 process of Special Assessments. The maximum amount of these one -time improvements is $3,310,000 plus an additional $350,000 for annual maintenance and operation expenses. The ongoing annual expenses is,based on. the current budget, of approximately ,$250,000 plus an additional $100,000 to provide enhanced services requsted by the property owners. This ongoing expense will be 'addressed separately at the regularly scheduled special assessment hearings in Fall 2014. The one -time expenses are anticipated to be acted upon after the February 18, 2014 Public Hearing. Capital improvements to the publicly owned ramps, such as upgraded lighting, new elevator and an external wayfinding- system are anticipated to be borne by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) using proceeds from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. These improvements are estimated to cost $2,375,000. After the.Feasibility Report is approved, responsibility for implementing the proposed project (Improvement No. P -23) will be shifted to the Public Works department. Other departments will be involved as needed. to ensure broad community goals are achieved. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -17 Feasibility Report for 50ch & France Parking Ramp & Streetscape Improvements (P -23) ::4 RESOLUTION NO. 204 -17 RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING,PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO 50TH & FRANCE PARKING RAMPS AND RELATED STREETSCAPE, IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by Kimley -Horn Associates in accordance with their authorized proposal dated. August 16, 20.13' with reference to proposed Improvement No. P -23; and WHEREAS, this report identifies the recommended repairs and improvements to the three public parking ramps located at 3935 W. 49-1/2 Street (Middle Ramp), 4050 W. 51 n Street (South Ramp) and 3936 W. 41-1/2 Street (North Ramp) and related streetscape in the 50' and France commercial district; and WHEREAS, this report further recommends additional maintenance and operational improvements to be conducted on an annual basis to further the goals of the benefiting properties; and WHEREAS, this report was received by the City Council on January 21, 2014; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed Improvement No P -23 is necessary, cost- effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvements; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels; and WHEREAS, the cost responsibility for these improvements is anticipated to be shared by the impacted properties and the City whereby the property owners will be responsible for maintenance and operating costs. while the City is responsible for costs of capital improvements: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will ;consider the improvements proposed to the three existing public parking ramps and related streetscape in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvements of $5,685,000, $3;310,000 of. which is attributed to one-time maintenance and operation improvements plus an additional $350,000 annually for ongoing maintenance and operational improvements. - 2. A public hearing shall be held .on such proposed improvement on the l 8t' day of February, 2014, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Dated: January 21, 2014. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk �.. Cl 501h & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Edina Improvement No. P -23 Feasibility Study and Report Prepared for: City of Edina January 21, 2014 < =n Kimley -Horn D and Associates, Inc. January 21, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street 'Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Re: Feasibility Study and Report 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Edina Improvement No. P -23 City of Edina, Minnesota Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: The enclosed feasibility report has been prepared for the 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements, as authorized at the August 20, 2013 City Council meeting. The feasibility report identifies the elements of the proposed improvements developed with city staff and with input from business owners and property owners in the 50d& France District. the engineer's opinion of probable construction and design costs and a method for financing the project are also provided in the feasibility report. Information used in the preparation of this report included previous studies, information gathered through field reviews of the project area, discussions with city staff, meetings with the property owners and business owners in the 50th & France District, and a 50th & France District customer survey. We believe that the proposed project is feasible, that it will benefit the properties in the project area, and that it will benefit the City of Edina. Sincerely, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. bai (? 9 Daniel J. C e, . . Project Man ger Enclosure File: 160603003.3 FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT FOR CITY OF EDINA 50" & FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 (651) 645 -4197 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnes ta. Signature: Daniel J. o e E. Date: January 21, 2014 Lic. No: 44821 r• CITY OF EDINA 501h & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... ..............................1 2. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................ ............................... 3 3. CONSTRUCTION PHASING / STAGING .................................................. ............................... 9 4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................ ............................... 9 5. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS .................................................................. .............................10 Streetscape Improvements Plan 6. ESTIMATED COST .................................................................................. .............................25 Middle Ramp Improvements 7. METHOD OF FINANCING .................................................................... ............................... 26 8. PROJECT SCHEDULE ........................................................................... ............................... 27 9. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ ............................... 27 APPENDIX A — EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Location Map Exhibit 2: Existing Public Parking Signs Exhibit 3: Proposed Public Parking Signs Exhibit 4: Streetscape Improvements Plan Exhibit 5: Middle Ramp Improvements Exhibit 6: South Ramp Improvements Exhibit 7: North Ramp Concept APPENDIX B — RAMP ASSESSMENT PHOTOS APPENDIX C — ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2012 Streetscape Feasibility Report Summary of Property Owner and Business Owner Focus Group Meetings Parking Improvement Idea Survey (Business Owners and Property Owners) Menu of Alternatives Parking and Transportation Survey (Customers) APPENDIX D — PARKING OPERATIONS, MANAGEMENT, AND FINANCING APPENDIX E — PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL AND MAP CITY OF EDINA 50" & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Feasibility Study and Report has been prepared for the 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements. The proposed project includes repair, rehabilitation and future expansion of parking, a new parking wayfmding system, and repair and rehabilitation of the landscape and streetscape elements. The proposed scope of the improvements is generally as follows: • Add 140 to 200 new parking stalls through a public / private partnership on the 3930 West 49 th Street property (formerly the. Edina Realty building) and / or other sites in the 50th & France District. This goal will be pursued as a separate project. • Perform essential parking ramp repairs and preventative maintenance to the parking ramps. • Paint the interior of all parking ramps and the exterior of the South Ramp. • Replace deteriorated pavers with more salt tolerant pavers and improve drainage system below pavers. • Replace dying street trees and repair planter beds. • Screen all garbage areas with enclosure walls (two at Middle Ramp and one at South Ramp) and implement recycling centers. • New elevator and stair core in northeast comer of the South Ramp. • Increase brightness of parking ramp lighting by replacing existing fixtures with motion sensing LED fixtures. • Install a dynamic public parking wayfmding system. • Install an automatic underground irrigation system to serve two planter areas on south side of Middle Ramp. • Create easily identified pedestrian zones to and through parking ramps using floor paint, curbs and bollards. • Enhanced operations and maintenance of the parking ramps including power washing all ramps once per year, improved sanitation and quarterly cleaning of all glass. • Add hospitality signs at the entrance and exit of parking ramps. • Designate approximately 230 additional employee parking stalls and monitor employee parking demand. • Work with Metro Transit to add bus route and schedule signs, benches and bus shelters, and possibly real -time bus arrival information. The estimated costs for the proposed improvements are summarized below. These costs include a 20 percent construction cost contingency and a 30 percent allowance for indirect costs such as engineering, administrative, and legal items as well as capitalized interest. Items in italics would be assessed under Chapter 429. Proposed Capital Improvements Estimated Cost D.1 Increase Brightness of Lighting $ 650,000 E.1 Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access $ 100,000 E.3 New Elevator and Stair in South Ramp $ 1,100,000 F.3 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System $ 350,000 G.1 Paint All Ramp Interior and South Ramp Exterior Surfaces $ 1,375,000 G.6 Screen All Garbage Areas $ 60,000 H.1 Replace Dead/ Dying Trees $ 25, 000 H.2 Replace Broken Pavers $ 500,000 H.13 Automatic Irrigation System $ 175,000 H.14 Repair Planter Beds $ 50,000 I.1 Essential Ramp Repairs $ 650,000 1.2 Preventative Ramp Maintenance $ 650,000 Total Capital Cost $ 5,685,000 Proposed Additional Annual Maintenance Improvements Estimated Cost B.3 Holiday Season Parking Strategies $ 35,000 E.3 New Elevator and Stair in South Ramp Maintenance $ 10,000 F.3 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System Maintenance $ 10,000 G:3 Power Washing on Annual Basis $ 30,000 G.4 Improve Sanitation $ 10,000 H.13 Automatic Irrigation System Maintenance $ 5,000 I.2 Escrow. for Future Periodic Preventative Maintenance $ 100,000 Total Additional Annual Maintenance Cost $ 200,000 The improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination of assessments, parking permit revenues, and other city funds. The following is a summary of the estimated funding amounts from each of the proposed financing sources: Capital Cost Financing Source Amount Assessments Other City Funds Total $ 3,310,000 $ 2,375,000 $ 5,685,000 Additional Annual Maintenance Cost Financing Source Amount Assessments Parking Permit Revenues Total $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 Annual operations and maintenance costs have been in the range of $250,000 per year for the past few years. The Additional Annual Maintenance Cost of $200,000 is in addition to the historic average cost. Rebates for installing energy efficient light may be available from Xcel Energy to offset a portion of the cost of the lights. The amount of rebates offered by Xcel varies from time to time and would be determined at the time of design and construction. ii The following is a proposed schedule for the implementation of the improvements. City Council Receive Feasibility Report, Call for Public Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Final Plans and Specifications January 21, 2014 Public Hearing, City Council Orders Project , Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Ad for Bids February 18, 2014 Bid Opening May 22, 2014 Assessment Hearing / Award Contract June 3,2014 Edina Art Fair June 6 -8, 2014 Start 2014 Construction June 16, 2014 Interim Construction Completion October 2014 2014 Holiday Shopping Season Nov -Dec, 2014 Start 2015 Construction March 2015 Edina Art Fair June 2015 Construction Complete October 2015 The focus of construction in 2014 would be the dynamic wayfmding system, lighting upgrade, pedestrian access improvements, streetscape improvements, parking structure repairs and preventative maintenance. In order to mitigate impacts to businesses during construction, construction of the new stair and elevator core for the South Ramp and interior and exterior ramp painting is assumed to occur in 2015. The resulting project construction schedule will be longer than if all work is completed concurrently. Based upon the analysis completed as a part of this report, the proposed 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements are feasible, necessary, and cost effective and would benefit the properties and businesses in the project area and the City of Edina. iii 1. INTRODUCTION On August 20, 2013 the Edina City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study for the 50th & France Parking and Wayfmding Improvement project, Edina Improvement No. P -23. The proposed project includes repair, rehabilitation and future expansion of parking, a new parking wayfinding system, and repair and rehabilitation of the landscape and streetscape elements. A feasibility report was previously prepared for 50`h & France Parking Ramp Expansion in April 2012. The recommendations from that report were not implemented, due to business owner and property owner concern about project cost and impacts during construction. That feasibility report was based on the shared parking analysis dated April 12, 2011 that recommends adding 140 — 200 additional parking stalls. Currently the following public parking is provided in the Edina portion of 50th & France District: • South Ramp: • Middle Ramp: • North Ramp: • Clancy Lot: • Lunds Lot (Public): • On- Street: 415 total spaces 274 total spaces 262 total spaces 36 total spaces 15 total spaces 20 customer spaces 200 employee spaces 0 employee spaces 220 employee spaces 0 employee spaces 0 employee spaces 0 employee spaces There are an additional 305 private spaces in Edina owned by Lunds, Walgreens, BMO Harris Bank, US Bank, the post office, and the 5000 France condos. Currently the following public parking is provided in the Minneapolis portion of the 50`h & France District: • Ewing Lot: 80 total spaces 0 employee spaces • On- Street: 20 customer spaces 0 employee spaces There are private lots that provide an additional 165 spaces in Minneapolis. A project location map is provided as Exhibit l in Appendix A with parking_ ramp locations shown on Exhibit 2 in Appendix A. Subsequent to the April 2012 feasibility report, a group of Edina property owners presented a parking expansion concept to the city that would add structured parking to the east and west of the North Ramp. This concept addressed the business owner and property owner concern about project cost and impacts during construction. The property owner proposal required, acquisition of the property t6 the east of the North Ramp (former Edina Realty building) and to the west of the North Ramp (former Hooten Cleaner building). As a result of this proposal,, and other considerations, the city proceeded with this feasibility study. This feasibility report has been developed with input from the 50`h & France Business and Professional Association:(the "Association ") and their members. See Section 4 —. Public Involvement for more information regarding stakeholder involvement. The following Guiding Principles were created to help the project development process: In order to maintain and enhance the 501h & France district vision, to be the pre- eminent destination for the discerning consumer desiring, a charming neighborhood experience, the following improvements should be made to the parking system and public areas that support the viability of the local businesses. • Provide adequate number of parking stalls to accommodate employees and customers • Provide clean, well maintained, safe, welcoming and accessible parking structures • Optimize the use of existing parking using appropriate parking management best practices • Provide an effective communication system to help customers navigate to available parking stalls • Provide opportunities to access the district via non - motorized means such as Metro Transit, on foot and by bicycle • Provide a streetscape that is well maintained, accessible, safe, and continues to reinforce the unique character and identity of the district • Have a sustainable financing mechanism for annual maintenance, periodic repairs and future replacement • Mitigate construction impacts to businesses during construction, including no construction from October 23 through January I and during the Edina Art Fair. The proposed project recommended in this feasibility report is consistent with the Guiding Principles. The proposed scope is generally as follows: • Add 140 to 200 new parking stalls through a public / private partnership on the 3930 West 49 '/z Street property (formerly the Edina Realty building) and / or other sites in the 50th & France District. This goal will be pursued as a separate project. • Perform essential parking ramp repairs and preventative maintenance to the parking ramps. • Paint the interior of all parking ramps and the exterior of the South Ramp. • Replace deteriorated pavers with more salt tolerant pavers and improve drainage system below pavers. • Replace dying street trees and repair planter beds. • Screen all garbage areas with enclosure walls (two at Middle Ramp and one at South Ramp) and implement recycling centers. • New elevator and stair core in northeast comer of the South Ramp. • Increase brightness of parking ramp lighting by replacing existing fixtures with motion sensing LED fixtures. • Install a dynamic public parking wayfinding system. • Install an automatic underground irrigation system to serve two planter areas on south side of Middle Ramp. • Create. easily identified pedestrian zones to and through parking ramps using floor paint, curbs and bollards. • Enhanced operations and maintenance of the parking ramps including power washing all ramps once per year, improved sanitation and quarterly cleaning of all glass. • Add hospitality signs at the entrance and exit of parking ramps. • Designate approximately 230 additional employee parking stalls and monitor employee parking demand. • Work with Metro Transit to add bus route and schedule signs, benches and bus shelters, and possibly real -time bus arrival information. The proposed improvements included as a part of this project are detailed in this report along with the estimated costs, a proposed financing plan, and a proposed schedule for the implementation of the project. 2. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The following is a summary of the proposed improvements included as a part of this project. Exhibits 3 through 6 in Appendix A further illustrate the proposed improvements. A. Parldng Expansion With a goal of adding 140 to 200 new parking stalls within the district to better serve the needs of the community, the City of Edina has purchased the property at 3930 West 49 '/z Street, formerly the Edina Realty building. The city has investigated other possible expansion sites, including 3944 West 49 %2 Street (the Hooten Cleaners site) and the city's surface parking lot at Halifax and West 49 %2 Street (the Clancy Lot). At this time only the former Edina Realty building appears to be a candidate for parking expansion. The preferred method for adding parking is to develop street level commercial space with new public parking provided above. In the future, the city may reach out to potential developers to formulate a redevelopment plan that is consistent with the vision of the 50T& France District and the goal to provide adequate public parking. I B. Customer Parking No changes to customer parking. Customer parking will remain free. C. Employee Parking Designate approximately 230 additional permit parking stalls and continue to monitor employee parking demand. Designate the entire North Ramp, top two levels of the Middle Ramp, and the underground level of the South Ramp as employee permit parking. Leave all other parking as currently designated. The new employee permit areas should be designated as "5 HOUR AND PERMIT ", similar to the existing employee permit areas. Peak employee parking demand is estimated to be as great as 750 stalls, but only 430 permit parking spaces are currently provided. These figures are for businesses in the Edina portion of the district only. The peak employee parking demand in the Minneapolis portion of the district is estimated to be 180 stalls. 50t & FRANCE PARKING SUMMARY CITY OF EDINA PARKING Ramp Name Existing Parking Proposed Parkin South Ramp 415 Total Spaces 415 Total Spaces 3` Level 114 — Five Hour and Permit 114 — Five Hour and Permit 2° d Level 90 — 20 — Two Hour Five Hour and Permit 90 — 20 — Two Hour Five Hour and Permit 1St Level 110 — Two Hour 110 — Two Hour Underground 80 — Permit Only 80 — Permit Only Middle Ramp 274 Total S aces 274 Total Spaces 3rd Level 94 — Five Hour 94 — Five Hour and Permit 2° Level 90 — Five Hour 90 — Five Hour and Permit 1St Level 90 — Two Hour 90 — Two Hour North Ramp 262 Total S aces 262 Total Spaces 3` Level 72 — Five Hour and Permit 72 — Five Hour and Permit 2° Level 72 — Five Hour and Permit 72 — Five Hour and Permit 1St Level 72 — Five Hour and Permit 72 — Five Hour and Permit Underground 45 — Two Hour 45 — Five Hour and Permit Clancy Lot 36 — One Hour Some 15min) 36 — One Hour (Some 15min) France Ave On- Street 20 — One Hour 20 — One Hour Lunds Lot (Public) 15 — One Hour 15 — One Hour Other Private Parkin 305 — Varies 305 — Varies TOTALS 305 — Private 71— One Hour 335 — Two Hour 184 — Five Hour 350 — Five Hour and Permit 80 — Permit Only 305 — Private 71— One Hour 290 — Two Hour 0 — Five Hour 579 — Five Hour and Permit 80 — Permit Only 4 It is recommended that the employee parking permit price. be increased from $60 per year to at least $120 per year. Ideally the employee parking permit price would be established to incentivize alternative modes of transportation and to fund an escrow account for future periodic ramp preventative maintenance. There are approximately 1,000 employees in the Edina portion of the district. In 2013 the city issued approximately 620 parking permits. It is assumed that not all employees are obtaining parking permits. Work with Metro Transit to understand opportunities to make transit use simpler, including adding bus route and schedule signs, benches and bus shelters, and possibly real -time bus arrival information. D. Parking Ramp Lighting and Security Increase brightness in the parking ramps by replacing existing lights with motion sensing LED fixtures. It is assumed that the existing conduit and wiring can be reused. In general, the existing lights are installed in pairs in each bay of the parking ramps. New fixtures would be selected that improve the light distribution and brightness using a one for one replacement. In the lowest level of the South Ramp, more fluorescent light fixtures are located in the center and west bays than the other bays in the parking ramp. Therefore, few replacement LED fixtures would be required in these two bays than currently exist. E. Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access Provide easily identifiable pedestrian walkways to and through the parking ramps using floor paint, curbs and / or bollards. Primary locations for walkways are in the ground level of all three parking ramps, and especially along the north side of the South Ramp where the Lunds sidewalk enters the South Ramp and crosswalks in the South Ramp at the two stairwells. Construct a new elevator and replacement stair core in the northeast comer of the South Ramp. The new stair /elevator core would replace the existing stair which is in fair to poor condition. The addition of the elevator will make the parking ramp easier to navigate for patrons with physical disabilities, stroller or heavy packages. F. Parking Wayfinding Install a dynamic public parking directional signage system throughout the district with real time parking availability. The system will consist of four decorative signs with electronic directional information, one for each of the four major approaches to the district. These decorative signs will display directional arrows next to each ramp names, to indicate the direction to turn to navigate to a ramp, or the word "FULL" indicating the driver should plan to navigate to an alternate parking ramp. Each parking ramp will have a ground mounted decorative sign with electronic message board, with a special message for patrons entering ramp. Eight decorative non- electronic parking wayfmding signs with ramp name and directional arrow will be installed. See Exhibit 3 in Appendix A for proposed sign layout. The parking wayfinding system will have a central server that receives input from vehicle sensing traffic counters at the entrance and exit from each of the three parking ramps to determine the number of available parking stalls in each parking ramp. This information will be used to determine if any of the three. ramps are nearing capacity. If any of the ramps are nearing capacity, the decorative electronic parking wayfmding signs that are located at each major roadway approach to the 5.0'h & France District will indicate "FULL" for that ramp so that drivers can navigate to one of the other ramps that has parking availability. The system is not intended to help drivers once they are in -the ramp, given the relatively simple circulation pattern and driver search methods for finding available stalls in each ramp. During final design the parking ramps and surface lots should be given formal names for use in the wayfinding system. Public art or internal paint schemes should be considered to reinforce the parking and pedestrian wayfinding system. G. Parking Ramp Aesthetics Paint all interior surfaces of all ramps, exterior of the South Ramp, and trash enclosures. Proper surface cleaning is critical prior to paint application. Surface preparing will include power washing or an equivalent cleaning method. Paint colors in stairwell and elevator lobbies and the first 30 feet of vehicle entry areas should be selected to reinforce the parking ramp identity and parking level to aid in pedestrian wayfinding.. • Paint underside of concrete decks including beams and slabs • Paint concrete columns • Paint interior of stairwells including metal stairs, railings and walls • Paint walls in parking ramps • Paint deck drains Power wash parking ramps, including stairwells, on an annual basis. In addition to helping the ramps look clean, power washing will remove salts and dirt from the surface of the parking decks which will help extend the useful life of the.parking ramps. Improve sanitation of the ramps by picking up trash in stairwells on a weekly basis. Install additional hospitality signs in the parking ramps, to enhance and compliment the signs installed in 2013. Screen all garbage areas with enclosure walls; two enclosure walls for the Middle Ramp, and one enclosure wall for the South Ramp. Enclosure walls will be prefabricated ABS plastic or steel panel systems with painted steel posts, gates, hardware, to look like louvers, brick or wood slats and can be a custom color. Add recycling and composting centers in the existing garbage areas, provided there is room and can be screened. H. Streetseape Replace approximately a third of the existing sidewalk paver areas, which have deteriorated and have a high priority need of replacement. See Exhibit 4 in Appendix A. Provide concrete under slab drainage for all areas where concrete pavers are replaced. Replace approximately 15% of the existing street trees. Adjust the tree grates of most of the street trees by cutting the openings larger and reset them to reduce tripping hazards. Replace all of the trees and all of the shrubs and perennials in the at -grade and raised planting beds, due to poor health or outgrowing the planting area. Provide new planting design that includes a combination of shrubs and perennial plantings, for increased seasonal color and interest. Remove the existing cast -in -place concrete sidewalk and plantings along the north wall of the Middle Ramp, and install concrete pavers on a permeable concrete under slab. Because of limited space between the existing curb and north face of the Middle Ramp install trash receptacle and bollards, but no plantings. Install an automatic underground irrigation system to the landscape areas south of the Middle Ramp. Directional bore under sidewalks and driveways to access irrigated areas with electric valve wires and water supply piping. It is assumed that the existing irrigation service point, controller and water supply are adequate to serve the expanded irrigated area. I. Parldng Ramp Repairs The project will provide for the essential repairs and preventative maintenance to the three parking ramps. Limits of repairs will be based on field observations and conditions. Structural repairs will be performed to address corrosion and deterioration that has occurred to the structure and restore the integrity of the structures. In addition to the concrete structure, other systems in the structures such as plumbing, (i.e. drains and drain piping) will be repaired. These repairs include the following: • Caulk joint replacement • Failed shear tab replacement (Middle Ramp only) • Expansion joint replacement • Concrete crack sealing • Concrete repairs • Drain and corroded piping replacements • Railing repairs • Deck sealer on concrete decks • Traffic membrane on concrete deck • Replace caulk joints in precast panels • Painting of structural steel • Replace guardrail J. Maintenance Ongoing maintenance will be important to maintain the investment in the parking ramps at 50'h & France and also provide an inviting appearance for the customers. By performing timely repairs and maintenance of the ramps, the useful life of the structures should be realized or exceeded. With timely maintenance, the anticipated useful life of the Middle,Ramp should be an additional 20 years, the South Ramp should be over 30 years (except possibly the joist system above the lowest level), and the North Ramp should be over 40 years. With the repairs being performed in 2014, a better assessment of the condition of the reinforcing steel in that portion of the ' structure can be made which will allow a more accurate assessment of the useful life of that portion of the structure to be made. The following is ,a list of items and suggested frequency of activities: DailyzH eekI • Debris collection • Sweeping of stairwells • Washing windows in stair and elevator cores Monthly • Sweeping of decks Annually • Power washing of decks • Inspection of decks /identification of restoration needs • Re -lamp burned out lights* * Frequency will depend on type of fixture. If existing fixtures are not replaced, it is recommended to relamp entire areas every two to three years and relamp outages on an annual basis. If LED fixtures are installed, replace lights on an as needed basis. LED lights should have a minimum life of ten years prior to needing replacement. Periodically • Repair deteriorated concrete (as needed) • Seal cracks in concrete (as needed) • Replace expansion joints (7 to 10 years) • Replace caulk joints (7 to 10 years) • Re -apply deck sealer (10 to 15 years) • Re -apply traffic membrane (7 to 10 years) • Repaint concrete surfaces (as needed) • Repaint non - pedestrian steel railings (15 to 20 years) • Repaint steel pedestrian railings (3 to 5 years) Many of the more expensive maintenance activities occur infrequently, and need to be budgeted for to maintain a reserve fund to easily pay for these repairs. It is recommended that employee permit parking fees be increased so that $100,000 can be kept in reserve each year for future periodic preventative maintenance. 3. CONSTRUCTION PHASING /STAGING Significant concern has been expressed by area property owners and business owners regarding the impact that the proposed construction could have on the ability for businesses to remain open and successful while construction is underway. Based on these concerns, we have considered options to minimize business impacts during construction. It is proposed that construction be performed while the roadways and parking ramps are open to traffic, generally taking no nore'than 50 parking stalls out of service at any one time during daytime hours. Some repair activities would benefit from taking a larger area out of service at a time, such as deck sealing the entire upper level of the South Ramp. As an option to performing this work in two or three phases, doing it in one phase would require the area to be closed'for two days. In these cases, the options would be discussed with the business and property owners to develop a plan acceptable to them. Some short duration activities will require taking more than 50 parking stalls out of service at one time, during nighttime hours. It is proposed that streetscape work be completed in segments to limit construction disruption at the business storefronts. Other construction activities not resulting. in significant parking or storefront access disruptions would be ongoing throughout the duration of the project. The project will include special signage for wayfinding during construction. Wayfinding during construction is complicated by drivers and pedestrians attention to construction activity. Special construction signage will be installed, and adjusted for each phase of construction, to draw special attention to access routes to parking ramps, businesses and other points of interest. Construction will be coordinated with the annual Edina events, the Edina Art Fair and the holiday shopping season, from the last week in October through the end of December. Successful construction staging and phasing will require frequent communication with the business owners and the customers in the 50th & France district to clearly communicate the upcoming work and directing them to available parking spaces. 4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The City of Edina directed Kimley -Horn to conduct meetings with property owners and business owners in the 50th & France District to present information about the project and to give stakeholders an opportunity to provide input on the project. A small group of property owners and business owners was selected to provide input on the project process and decisions. This Project Advisory Team met seven times during the project and was critical in developing the Guiding Principles, alternatives and financing plan. An Open House meeting was held on September 18, 2013 to raise awareness of the project and to kick -off the public involvement activities. Nine focus group meetings with business owners and property owners were conducted between October 14 and October 18, 2013. The focus group meetings introduced a parking improvement survey that was available for business owners and property 9 owners to take on -line. A, summary of these meetings and parking improvement survey can be found in Appendix C. A customer parking survey was conducted between December 14 and December 19, 2013. The results. of the customer sury ey can be found in Appendix C. Kimley -Horn also requested employee, work schedule information from all businesses to determine the employee parking demand during the week. Many attempts were made to contact all property owners and business owners in the 50'h & France District. A Kimley -Horn representative visited each business in the district over a two =day period to make initial contact and distribute an invitation to focus group meetings. Kimley -Horn and the Association sent periodic email messages to all business owners to reinforce the need for public participation in the project development process, and asked for specific involvement in the surveys. Continued public involvement will be key during the final design process. 5. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Based on the Guiding Principles the following alternatives were developed by city staff and the Project Advisory Team. Through focus group meetings and anon -line survey, business owners and property owners ranked the alternatives. See Appendix C for the results of the business owner and property owner survey. The alternatives are grouped by category below and listed in order of business owner and property owner preference, from higher to lower preference. Alternatives in bold are recommended and part of the proposed improvements. All order of magnitude costs include indirect costs and a contingency. The alternatives below are taken from the Menu of Alternatives matrix found in Appendix C. The Menu of Alternatives, in Appendix C, includes information about the Project Advisory Team's preferences about which alternatives should be included in the preferred alternative. A. Parldng Ramp Expansion A.1 Add parking on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites with commercial space at ground level. Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $12,000,000. A.2 Add surface parking on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites with possible parking ramp construction in the future. Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites. Does not include future parking ramp costs. Assumes about 20 stalls on Hooten Cleaner site and 30 stalls on Edina Realty site. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $350,000. A.3 Add parking ramp on Edina Realty, Hooten Cleaner and Clancy Lot sites with commercial space at ground level Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $16,000,000. A.4 Add parking ramp on new sites without integrated commercial space on ground level. Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites; 3 level expansion on Hooten Cleaners and Edina Realty sites. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $5,000,000. 10 Notes regarding the alternatives: North Ramp Expansion Considerations The expansion in each direction would allow for up to a three story expansion with the floor plates matching the elevations of the existing structure. Existing vehicle circulation within the ramps would be utilized to access the new floor plates. Pedestrian circulation for the west expansion of the existing ramp would utilize the existing stairs and elevator in the southwest comer. An additional stair would be required within the east expansion of the existing ramp to provide additional pedestrian exiting. Expansions would be constructed out of reinforced, post - tensioned concrete matching the existing ramp. Exterior materials would match the exterior of the existing North Ramp. The North Ramp was originally constructed as a two level structure in 1991. A third level was added to the structure and also expanded to the west in the 1990's. Zoning requirements for the PCD -2 district allow height up to 48 feet or four stories through a height overlay district. However, expansion of the structure taller than three stories would likely require modifications to the foundations of the existing North Ramp. Setback requirements within the PCD -2 district require expansion to be set back twenty -five feet from the north property boundary that abuts a residential district unless a variance is attained. Expansion onto the former Edina Realty Building site matching parameters of the existing ramp was considered for this study and would require a variance. Expansion onto the Hooten Cleaners site matching the existing ramp parameters was considered for this study and would not require a variance. Inte.grated Commercial /Parking Considerations Considering the overall district, there is an expressed desire to consider the incorporation of commercial/retail space into the ground level of parking structure expansion. This mixed -use arrangement would provide additional commercial property frontage on 49 '/2 Street and would minimize the impression of all parking along 49h '/2 Street. The extent of commercial space considered in this study totaled 4,850 square feet on the Hooten Cleaners site and 7,500 square feet within the Edina Realty Building site. Creation of occupied spaces within the open air parking ramp requires waterproofing and insulation above the commercial space as well as fire separations, sprinklers and additional mechanical systems. In order to maximize new parking stalls, commercial space for this study was configured on the ground level only, underneath level two of the parking structures. This arrangement creates atypical commercial space requiring a sunken floor to achieve nine foot clear ceiling heights. When floors are sunk two to three feet below street level, ramps are required to create access for service and pedestrians. A more optimal configuration for retail spaces would require omitting level two in the parking structure expansion to allow clear ceiling heights approaching 15 feet. Based on conversations with property owners in the 50'' and France district, the commercial spaces, as described above, in parking ramps are not very desirable and could likely be leased in the $.15 to $20 per square foot range. Assuming a 6 percent interest rate for the capital, the lease payments would not cover the financing cost for the commercial space. 11 Surface Parking Considerations Another alternative considered is the construction of surface parking lots on either or both of the Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaners sites. This alternative would provide additional parking in the district and would provide time for the impact of parking management strategies and dynamic wayfinding to be evaluated. Construction of the surface lots would also provide more parking spaces during construction activities to replace spaces lost due the construction work in the parking ramps. B. Customer Parking B.1 Free customer parking. No capital cost associated with this option. 13.2 Encourage turnover at prime customer spaces using posted time limits and / or meters. Assume meters for Edina on- street parking (40 stalls) and only signs in the ramps. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $25,000. B.3 Holiday season parking strategies; additional parking ambassadors and offsite employee parking. Add two ambassadors from Nov 1 through January 15 from 7:30am - 7:30pm; Offsite employee parking on weekdays only during shopping season; Employees use 125 US Bank stalls during weekends during holidays. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $35,000 annually. B.4 Add short term parking for customers or deliveries on south side of 49 1/2 Street. Add signs and pavement markings; Does not include street, sidewalk or curb work. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $10,000. B.5 Add short term parking on north side of 51 st Street. Add signs and pavement markings; Does not include street, sidewalk or curb work. Order of magnitude cost. estimate; $10,000. B.6 Valet parking. Four valet stations; Operates year round 10am IOpm; Assume valet parking in ramps, except during holiday season. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $250,000 annually. B.7 Access control and paid parking in South and Middle Ramps with 2 or 3 hour free parking. Validation program for additional time at business expense. Employee parking controlled by prox card and gates. No "ticket spitters" or controls for customer parking. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. B.8 Add meters to on- street parking both in Edina and Minneapolis. Assume 40 on- street stalls in Edina and 40 on- street stalls in Minneapolis. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. 12 Notes regarding the alternatives: Paid Parking Considerations Customer parking is essential to the 50`x' & France District, although there are small numbers of customers that travel by transit, walk, bike or take other modes of transportation that do not require a parking stall. Parking for customers is almost always available, even during the holiday shopping season, but not always in locations convenient to customers' ultimate destination. The primary cause for customer parking inconvenience is attributed to employees parking in customer parking areas. To improve the customer parking experience, employee compliance with permit parking regulations is essential. The following two parking strategies would be very effective to help customers and. employees find appropriate parking: • Access control and paid parking in the parking ramps with 2 -3 hour free parking. Validation program for longer customer parking durations at businesses expense (Alternative 137). • Add parking meters to on- street parking on France Avenue (Alternative 138). Through the public involvement process, see Section 4, the business owners and property owners insisted that customer parking needs to be free, and no systems should be installed that might indicate paid customer parking. Both of the alternatives listed ranked at the bottom of customer parking strategies. With a free parking approach, the requirement to enforce compliance with the parking regulations becomes very important. If enforcement of parking regulations is not effective in keeping customer stalls open, it is recommended that on- street meters and parking ramp access control be implemented. These are parking management best practices for parking environments like 50th & France. C. Employee Parking C.1 Leave employee parking as is: Top two levels of North Ramp, bottom and top level of South Ramp. No cost if parking is left as is. C.2 Require all employees to have a parking permit. No infrastructure cost, only enterprise cost. C.3 Employee parking in North Ramp, top of Middle Ramp and bottom level of South Ramp. Add signs and pavement markings. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $10,000. CA Add lightweight roof over top level of parking ramps to add covered employee parking. Standing seam metal roof over entire ramp footprint. Does not include structural modifications to existing structures. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $6,700,000. 13 C.5 Dedicated motorcycle and bicycle parking area in all ramps. Add signs and pavement markings. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $15,000. C.6 Install heated bus shelters along 50th & France with real -time "Next Bus In X Minutes" signage. Assumes four 4'x 10' shelters. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $500,000. C.7 Graduated employee parking rates: Free in North Ramp; moderate fee for Middle Ramp, largest fee for South Ramp. Assumes no additional cost. C.8 Incentivize public transit use by free bus passes and optimizing bus routes with MTC. C.9 Add bike lockers and shower room to encourage bike commuting. 10 pairs of lockers per ramp - shower facility is included as tenant build out in 2,000 SF north ramp new commercial space - 2 ADA showers, 2 ADA toilets, plus retail for coffee or other limited food. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $700,000. Notes regarding the alternatives: Lightweight Roof Considerations New lightweight or fabric roofs on top of the existing North, Middle and South Ramps as a method of increasing use of the top levels by Employees was evaluated for this report. Roof materials of coated vinyl similar to the well -known Metrodome roof but supported by a steel structural framework fall into this category. For an addition of this type, one must first consider the building code and impacts on the structure. Existing ramps are cast in place or precast concrete design of Type I or Type II construction. It is assumed that new structural members within a roof system would need to be fire rated to comply with the building code. For steel members, this would likely mean spray or trowel applied fire proofing that is visible within the ramp. Another consideration is natural ventilation. Open area on the sides of the ramps would need to be maintained if a roof structure was added, to provide natural ventilation for the upper level of the ramp. This open area would need to be evenly distributed on all sides of the ramps. Roof structure and enclosure.would need to account for this open area where structure meets the existing sidewall/parapet of the ramp. However, it may be possible that roof structural elements may not require fire rating if the roof is below the 50,000 square -foot area- per -tier limit for Type II -B construction per IBC 2006 table 406.3.5 and natural ventilation is provided. In addition to building code, the zoning code must be considered. All existing ramps are within or surrounded by a zoning district that allows building height up to forty- eight feet. Current ramps adjacent to residential districts do not reach the forty-eight foot height. With the addition of roof structures on top of the existing upper levels of all ramps, it is possible that allowable building height may be met or exceeded. It is possible that adjacent property owners within residential districts could object to the additional height. Lightweight roofs would likely use fabric that is light in color — perhaps white. This color is typically chosen to allow daylight through the fabric to 14 supplement artificial light and to limit heat gain. The light color of lightweight roof structures could be received negatively by adjacent neighbors during the. day. Lightweight roofs constructed of light or white colored fabrics will also glow when lighted at night. This condition not addressed in the zoning code but one that may need consideration in the same manner as. lighting trespass. Beyond zoning, operations and maintenance of additions to the existing ramps warrants consideration. Material used for lightweight roofs of fabric or other membrane roofs will require a level of maintenance exceeding current ramp roof maintenance. Lightweight roofs will likely channetwater to locations on the ramp not currently provided with storm drains and additional drains and plumbing may be required. A lightweight roof, while possibly translucent and capable of transmitting some daylight, will require additional artificial lighting on the upper level. . Another strategy considered to provide protected employee parking on the top levels of all ramps is an open framework supporting a photovoltaic (solar) energy system. This type of system would provide some sun shading and weather projection for vehicles but would not completely block rain or snow. The system would likely be delivered in a turnkey fashion by a company that builds and operates the system and then sells energy to the Owner. Given the relatively small size of Edina Ramps, a solar energy system project delivered and maintained by a third party would have a higher than average initial cost. Costs for renewable energy systems can be offset by state or federal grants and utility company incentives or credits. D. Parking Ramp Lighting and Security D.1 Increase brightness of lighting. One for one replacement of fixtures with motion sensing LED. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $650,000. D.2 Add video surveillance in critical areas of all ramps. License plate readers and stairwell cameras. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $300,000. D.3 Install "panic" stations with direct communication to police department. Two emergency phones per level of ramp totaling 20. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. DA Add video surveillance in all areas of all ramps. Full camera coverage in all ramps including license plate readers. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $750,000. D.5 Hire a parking ambassador. Add ambassador from 7:30am - 7:30pm. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $60,000 annual cost. D.6 Add video cameras in smaller alleyways and sidewalks. Add cameras to street lights, parking ramps or other public structures; Assumes conduit and wires for power and data are installed as part of sidewalk reconstruction for landscape / streetscape projects; Surface restoration costs need to be accounted for elsewhere; Assumes 20 cameras. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $300,000. 15 D.7 Increase foot patrols (police, ambassadors and / or night escorts). Add one part-time night escort for entire year. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. D.8 Replace functional lighting with decorative or indirect lighting. One for one replacement of fixtures except first level of South Ramp which would reduce the number of fixtures. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $400,000. Notes regarding the alternatives: Lighting System Considerations Two different light types are used in the parking ramps. The western two bays of the ground level of the South Ramp systems are fluorescent lights. The remainder of the lights in the South Ramp and all lights in the Middle Ramp and the North Ramp are metal halide lights. To increase the level of lighting in the ramps, several different alternatives can be considered. A couple of these alternatives are: • Add additional fixtures of the same type, i.e. metal halide or fluorescent lights • Replace existing fixtures with a different that provides a higher level of light and a different light distribution to provide better light coverage A lighting on demand system can also be installed to reduce, energy usage. This type of system incorporates sensors for pedestrians and vehicles that turns on lights when a person or vehicle is approaching. After a period of time with no activity, the lights automatically turn off. One of the drawbacks to this system is that the parking ramps would appear dark or under -lit to a person entering the ramp or driving by. This could provide a sense of the ramp not being a safe place. If.this system is used, some lights should be left on at all times to provide a minimum level of lighting. Securit ystem Considerations Security features in parking ramps, in addition to good lighting and an open parking structure, can include security cameras, call for assistance buttons (panic buttons), license'plate readers. Active measures, like security cameras, can be mounted throughout the parking ramps or just in more pedestrian heavy areas such as the stair wells and stair /elevator cores. The stair /elevator areas are critical areas where pedestrians want and need to feel safe. Most of the stairwells and elevator lobbies in the three parking ramps are fairly open and visible. Except for the southeast or center stair and the northwest stairs in the South Ramp, the stairs and elevators have adequate glass to provide visibility. Security measures in these areas include having security cameras, call for assistance buttons and adequate lighting. Security cameras can provide live feeds to a security monitoring office or they can function as recording devices. Security cameras that are monitored require full time staff which significantly increases the operational cost. Security cameras used to record activities in the structures in case an incident is reported provides a means to investigate the incident. 16 Call for assistance buttons are connected to a security monitor office, which would likely be the Edina Police Department. When activated by a user, an officer would be dispatched to the location of the alert for assistance. From an overall ramp security system, the additional security cameras can be installed to monitor more areas. Additionally, license plate readers can be installed at the entrance and exit points to record license plates on cars using the ramps. This would provide information on who was using the ramp in the event of a reported incident. In addition to this security purpose, the devices could be part of the system to collect data for monitoring employee parking and the dynamic wayfmding system. E. Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access E.1 Easily identified pedestrian zone to and through parking ramps using floor paint, curbs and bollards. Assumes four locations. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $100,000. E.2 New elevator / stair in Middle Ramp. Assumed on south side of ramp located at midpoint in east -west direction. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $925,000. E.3 New elevator / stair in South Ramp. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $1,100,000. EA Designate more accessible parking stalls on first level of all parking ramps. Additional signs and pavement markings. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $10,000. E.5 High visibility crosswalk/lighting at SE stair exit at South Ramp. Assumed 2 lighted signs and striping. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $15,000. E.6 Add speed bumps or tables near pedestrian routes. Assumes removal of concrete and buildup of speed bump. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $75,000. E.7 Reconstruct southeast stairwell in South Ramp to be compliant with current building code. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $450,000. E.8 Skyway to connect Middle and North ramp buildings. Assumes skywalk supported independent of existing structures. Unheated space. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $1,350,000. Notes regarding the alternatives: Elevator Considerations At the present time, only the North Ramp has an elevator to provide handicap accessibility. Considering the mix of customers in the 50th and France district, improving the handicap accessibility in the South Ramp and the Middle Ramp is desirable. Based on the size of the ramps, the addition of one elevator in each of the South Ramp and the Middle Ramp will meet the accessibility requirements of the current 17 building code. However, the current building code doesn't require that elevators need to be retrofit into the existing ramps. Elevator cabs would be sized to accommodate a wheeled stretcher or gurney. South Ramp New Elevator / Stair in Northeast Corner In the South Ramp, the recommended location of the elevator is in the northeast corner of the ramp. Given the condition of the existing stair in this location, the existing stair would be removed and a new stair and elevator core would be constructed in this location. The stair and elevator tower would serve each level of the parking ramp and provide access to the pedestrian walkways to France Avenue and 50th Street. With the stair /elevator located in the area of the existing northeast stair, it would provide an accessible route to the stair /elevator for the center and west bays of the ramp. With the grade of the east bay being steeper than 5 percent, an accessible route would not be provided for this area. Therefore, the accessible parking stalls on Levels 2, 3 and 4 should be located close to the stair /elevator core but in the center bay of the parking ramp. Primary enclosure for the new elevator stair would be with glass walls to provide daylight, passive security and wayfmding. The recommended location is in close proximity to surrounding buildings and the new structure would abut buildings to the east and west in addition to the ramp itself, adding some complexity: and cost to the construction process. Middle Ramp New Elevator /Stair Considerations In the Middle Ramp, the recommended location of a new stair and elevator core is on the south side of the ramp. The new stair and elevator tower would be located outside the existing ramp footprint within the existing plaza and planting area. This location is considered optimal due to its adjacency to pedestrian routes behind existing 50th Street businesses and a pedestrian access leading from the Middle Ramp to 50th Street and the mid -block pedestrian crosswalk. The new stair and elevator tower would serve all levels of the ramp and provide an accessible route from all bays of the ramp when accessible stalls are located in the flat, cross -over portions of the floor plate. The new stair and elevator tower design would have extensive areas of glass to provide daylight, passive security and wayfmding for ramp users. Masonry cladding compatible with the adjacent commercial building context would be used on opaque wall areas. Although a new elevator and stair for the Middle Ramp is desired by the property owners and business owners, the city does not currently have rfunds to construct this improvement. The decision not to fund this improvement as a part of this feasibility report is based primarily on the fact that the Middle Ramp has the shortest remaining service life of all of the ramps, and the availability of an elevator in the adjacent North Ramp. 18 Existing South Ramp Stair Core in Southeast Corner The southeast stair core does not provide any visibility into the ramp for users. Additionally, the stair treads are about two inches shallower than the current code requirements (9 inch tread depth instead of 11 inch tread depth). Some of the stair pans are in fair to poor condition and are in need of replacement or strengthening. This stair well could be reconstructed to meet the current building code requirements, address structural deficiencies in the stairs and also provide glass areas to improve the visibility of the stairwell. This would require the removal and reconstruction of the west wall of the stairwell. If this 'option is pursued, structural analysis of the stair core would be required. F. Wayfinding System F.1 Static public parking directional signage throughout the district. Twelve (12) decorative non - electronic parking wayfinding signs with ramp name and directional arrow. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $25,000. F.2 Static pedestrian directional signing to businesses and public ramps. Twenty - four (24) decorative non - electronic pedestrian wayfinding signs with "pedestrian street," "pedestrian plaza" and ramp names and directional arrows. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. F.3 Dynamic public parking directional signage throughout the district with real time parking availability. Four decorative electronic parking wayfinding signs with real -time parking availability, one for each major approach roadway; three decorative signs, one at each ramp, with special message for patrons entering ramp; eight decorative non - electronic parking wayfinding signs with ramp name and directional arrow. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $350,000. FA Electronic pedestrian directional signing to businesses and public ramps. Eight decorative electronic interactive pedestrian wayfinding kiosks; 16 non- electronic pedestrian wayfinding signs with "pedestrian street," "pedestrian plaza" and ramp names and directional arrows. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $200,000. F.5 Create public parking.and pedestrian navigation smartphone app. Full service e- commerce parking website to purchase permits, get real -time parking availability, pay fines, etc...; Smartphone app with turn -by -turn directions, to parking ramp; Smartphone app to mark parking location to aid pedestrian wayfinding back to vehicle. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $250,000. F.6 District ambassadors direct drivers to available parking. No additional cost; Ambassador costs covered under other line items. Notes regarding the alternatives: District Ambassador Considerations The 50th & France Association has considered hiring a district ambassador to increase employee parking compliance. A district ambassador would be a personable, 19 energetic person focused on the customer experience. Duties would include parking enforcement, providing directions to shops, identifying operations and maintenance needs, and promoting a safe and enjoyable customer experience. The Association met with two companies that provide district ambassador services to understand how to implement an ambassador program. It is not clear at this time whether an ambassador program will be implemented. In the meantime, the city will continue to have one full -time public works staff member assigned to the .506' & France district to address day -to -day maintenance issues and will add a community service officer to provide parking enforcement. Parking Wayfinding Technology There are many technology options for how a parking wayfmding system is implemented. There are a variety of solutions for how to count vehicles in the ramps and how to communicate parking availability information to users. There are systems that.have real -time vehicle detectors in each parking stall, with an associated overhead light indicating an available space; green for available, red for occupied. This type of wayfmding system is most beneficial for very large parking ramps that have hundreds of stalls and multiple circulation routes per level. These higher end systems are also best suited for installation with new construction. The one -way vehicle circulation pattern in each of the. 506i & France parking ramps forces drivers to pass every stall on each parking ramp level, making real -time presence detectors less beneficial. Given the relatively large installation cost for real -time presence detectors, and the fact that the wayfinding system is being retrofit into the existing parking ramps, it is proposed that parking ramp capacity / availability information be computed from a simple counter at the entrance and exit points to the ramps. G. Parking Ramp Aesthetics G.1 Paint all interior and exterior surfaces of all ramps and trash enclosures. Paint exterior on the south and east sides of the South Ramp as needed. Includes surface preparation of power washing or an equivalent method prior painting. Excludes exterior of middle and north ramps. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $1,375,000. G.2 Unify public parking with colors, signs, door colors, and elevator lobbies. Wall painting (images, words and / or color) unique to each parking ramp and parking level. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. G.3 Power washing on an annual basis. Annual cost. Includes stairwells and ramps. Basic power washing like done in 2013. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $30,000 annual cost. GA Improve sanitation. Weekly cleaning of stairwells. City currently spending $26,000 per year. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $10,000 additional annual cost. G.5 Entry and exit hospitality signs. Expansion of signs in 2013. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $25,000. 20 G.6 Screen all garbage areas, implement recycling centers three total enclosure walls - (2) at Middle Ramp, (1) at South Ramp - prefabricated ABS plastic or steel panel system with painted steel posts, gates, hardware - panels are patterned to look like louvers, brick or wood slats and can be custom color. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $60,000. G.7 Add public art, murals, plants. Public art, murals and plants within the parking structure, in addition to "unifying" colors, signs, etc... above. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. G.8 Unify public parking aesthetic with exterior skins. Metal mesh or metal panel skin with supporting. structure covering exposed elevations of South, Middle and North Ramps with painted steel panel with (8) 4'x6' display cases integral with skin on each ramp. Add $900,000 for stainless steel with (8) 65" LCD panels in outdoor cases on each ramp. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $600,000. G.9 , Information items / advertising. Make exterior pedestrian facing ground level of parking ramps feel like storefronts by adding display. cases for businesses to advertise - this number also included in low and high values for skin improvements. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $75,000. Notes regarding the alternatives: Ramp Painting Considerations Painting of interior surfaces has been proposed as method for improving aesthetics of existing structures. Painting can improve light levels if light colors are used, which can improve contrast for security cameras. Colors and patterns can also be utilized for way finding and branding. In order to repaint exterior surfaces at the South Ramp, surfaces would be cleaned and all loose material removed. Accomplishing this work while the ramp is occupied would require temporary enclosure of work areas or other methods of protecting adjacent surfaces and property from paint. This protection may temporarily impact stalls available within the ramp. Garbage Screening Considerations Existing waste collection areas within the district are located inside and outside the Middle Ramp and adjacent to the South Ramp. In many cases, dumpsters and other trash containers are exposed to view adjacent to major pedestrian circulation routes and business entries. It is a routine occurrence for some debris and an occasional oil spill to be on the ground in the waste area. This condition negatively affects perceptions of the district and also poses a liability as potential slip hazards. Renovation of existing screening as well as the addition of new screening and enclosures is proposed to create a consistent appearance throughout the district and improve waste management. Enclosures created from modular, prefabricated wall, gate and post components made from low maintenance, durable materials are recommended at three locations. Screen 21 walls can be constructed from multiple types of plastic composite in a variety of patterns compatible with the district aesthetics. Within the ground level of the Middle Ramp, a three sided enclosure with multiple gates would be constructed on the existing floor slab. On the east side of the Middle Ramp, the existing southeast waste area would be expanded to screen the existing room and provide space for additional containers and recycling. On the northeast comer of the South Ramp, existing waste containers, compactors and -utility boxes would be screened with. an enclosure along the existing service drive. An additional enclosure location could be considered by business owners at the southeast comer of the South Ramp based on comments indicating a waste problem in that area. These areas could be impacted by a pilot program of separating compostable materials from other waste. This program is anticipated to be implemented in 2014. H. Streetscape H.1 Replace dead / dying trees. 15 trees @ $500 and fix all tree grates. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $25,000. H2 Replace broken pavers. 30,000 SF (40% of total paver area) paver installation plus thru- drainage tubes and pea -rock in under slabs. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $500,000. H.3 Add sidewalk to south side of 49 1/2 Street. 200 LF x 8 FT: 1600 SF of concrete pavers to match existing. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. H.4 Beautify entrance to South Ramp with landscaping pots or seating plaza. 500 SF integrally colored, textured concrete plaza with 3 benches and tables; trash receptacles, bicycle loops, screen walls and overstory trees, Order of magnitude cost estimate; $80,000. H.5 Reconsider use of concrete pavers and replace with product with greater longevity and lower maintenance cost. Integrally colored, textured concrete as replacement for all pavers. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $1,500,000. H.6 Add growing vegetation with colorful flower walls on South Ramp southern exposure. Approximately 6400 SF. of Green Screen mounted to face of ramp, ivy planting. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $250,000. H.7 Add outdoor music in select plazas and "quiet" alleys. Cost estimate based on May 2009 estimate. Assumes directional boring cost share with irrigation work. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $120,000. H.8 Convert loading alley between Spalon Montage and Middle Ramp to a decorative plaza that accommodates larger vehicles. Open paver plaza with landscaped edges and decorative lighting. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $300,000. H.9 Create pedestrian plaza near West 51 st Street entrance to South Ramp. 500 SF integrally colored, textured concrete plaza with three benches and tables, trash 22 receptacles, bicycle loops, screen walls and overstory trees. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $80,000. H.10 Add small fountain with seating area near Clancy Lot. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $80,000. H.11 Add planted median, where possible, along West 49th' /z Street. Assumes 12 foot wide raised median and 400 linear feet of street reconstruction, planter soil, trees and perennials. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $375,000. H.12 Traffic calming at intersection of West 51st Street and Halifax Avenue. Assumes 100 linear feet of curb extensions on each side of West 51 st Street at Halifax Avenue. No change to existing crosswalk sign and lights. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $100,000. Note that alternatives H.13 and H.14 were added after the business owner and property owner survey was completed. Although alternatives H.13 and H.14 are at the end of the list of alternatives, it does not mean they are the lowest ranking alternatives. H.13 Automatic irrigation system. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $175,000. H.14 Repair planter beds. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000. Notes regarding the alternatives: Previous Landscape Feasibility Report The City of Edina initiated a 50'' & France District Streetscape Improvements Feasibility Study. Through a process that involved the district's business and property owner group representatives and city staff members, a draft report was prepared and issued on April 11, 2012. This report identified issues, proposed improvements, costs and phasing for the district's streetscape. and pedestrian facilities, with improvements to include; concrete paver repairs, street tree replacements, other landscape plantings, irrigation system, audio systems, and seasonal lighting. The April 11, 2012 50`h & France District Streetscape Improvements Feasibility Study has been provided for reference in Appendix C. This Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Study includes many of the same elements included within the previous study. However, based on recent input from the business and property owner group representatives and city staff, some of the improvement elements and priorities established have been modified. Also, based on a combination of on- going replacement efforts and deterioration of some of these elements, the streetscape recommendations for replacements and repair have been updated in this study. It should be noted that one project has been initiated and completed as a part of the 2012 report. This included the replacement of trees and perennials, and the installation of an irrigation system within the raised planters along West 50th Street. This work was completed in 2012. 23 Existing Conditions Many of the district's streetscape and pedestrian access improvements were either reconstructed or newly installed in 1990. These elements include street and pedestrian lighting, bollards and bollard lighting, specialty entrance monuments and wayfinding signage, raised planters, movable planters, a fountain, raised planters with trees and shrubs, at -grade foundation plantings of trees and shrubs, street trees planted in pits with tree grates, benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, newspaper corrals, concrete paver sidewalks, decorative handrails and fencing systems. A majority of these improvements can generally be described as being in good condition. As addressed within this report, the following items fall under the category of needing repair or replacement: 1. Concrete Paver Sidewalks: Approximately one third of the total sidewalk area is in need of replacement as soon as possible for both safety and general appearance reasons. Pavers in these areas are in varying stages of failure, but in general present an unsafe surface for pedestrians. The failure is most likely attributed to an underlying drainage issue. The existing pavement section includes concrete pavers on 1" of leveling sand and a 6 " +/- concrete under slab. There are no drains or means to remove water that accumulates on top of this concrete under slab. Therefore, deicing salt in combination with standing water has resulted in paver decomposition, from the bottom of the paver up. Over the past few years, city staff has either replaced pavers or patched the voids with asphalt at the removed pavers. 2. Street Trees: For the purposes of this report, street trees are identified as trees located within the street boulevard or within the pedestrian alleys, and planted in pits with tree grates. These trees are watered primarily by rainfall, but sometimes watered manually by city staff during drought conditions. The district does not have an automatic irrigation system for these trees or any other plantings within the public rights of way. There are approximately 80 street trees within the project. A majority of the trees are in reasonable condition, but approximately 15 to 20% require replacement due to damage from vehicles and vandalism, disease, sun scald, insects, lack of moisture and air, and a combination of all of these factors. Some street trees have reached the capacity of their tree grates ring openings, others have split trunks or large areas of bark removed, deformed, in general decline, or damaged in some way. Other trees are growing irregular and leaning towards buildings. 3. Other Landscaping: Other plantings exist within the district beyond street trees, and for this report are identified as those in raised planters or at -grade (building foundation) planting beds. The plants in these areas, like street trees, are only watered by rainfall and the occasional manual watering by city staff. Many of the trees in these planting areas are in reasonable condition. However, approximately a quarter require replacement because they have either outgrown their location and usefulness in their location, are leaning toward a building or pedestrian area, or have damage in some way. A majority of the ground plane plantings are shrubs, with some perennial plantings. While most are in reasonable condition, they have either outgrown their location or been damaged, in decline, and therefore need replacement. It is estimated that all shrubs and perennials will require replacement. 24 Audio System Considerations To provide for a future audio system, wires could be included within the same directionally -bored conduits installed for the irrigation system. No speakers or electronic equipment would need to be installed with this project. This work is not included in the proposed improvements. South Ramp Public Plaza Considerations An approximate 500 SF public open space for district visitors and employees was contemplated within an existing open landscape area south of South Ramp. Possible plaza elements include concrete pavers on a permeable concrete under slab, benches, trash receptacle, screen wall, decorative planters and overstory trees. This work is.not included in the proposed improvements. I. Parking Ramp Repairs I.1 Make necessary improvements to structural and functional elements of the parking ramps. Concrete repairs, joints, drain replacement, etc. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $650,000. I.2 Make preventative maintenance repairs to prolong service life of parking ramps. Traffic membrane, deck sealer, etc. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $650,000. I.3 Make necessary repairs to aesthetic elements of parking ramps. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $20,000. 6. ESTIMATED COST The estimated costs for the 50'' & France Parking and Wayfmding Project are detailed below. The estimated project costs include a 20 percent construction cost contingency and a 30 percent allowance for indirect costs such as engineering, administrative, and legal items as well as capitalized interest. Items in italics would be assessed under Chapter 429. Proposed Capital Improvements Estimated Cost D.1 Increase Brightness of Lighting $ 650,000 E.1 Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access $ 100,000 E.3 New Elevator and Stair in South Ramp $ 1,100,000 F.3 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System $ 350,000 G.1 Paint All Ramp Interior and South Ramp Exterior Surfaces $ 1,375,000 G.6 Screen All Garbage Areas $ 60,000 H.1 Replace Dead/ Dying Trees $ 25,000 H.2 Replace Broken Pavers $ 500,000 H.13 Automatic Irrigation System $ 175,000 H. 14 Repair Planter Beds $ 50,000 I.1 Essential Ramp Repairs $ 650,000 1.2 Preventative Ramp Maintenance $ 650,00 Total Capital Cost $ 5,685,000 25 Proposed Additional Annual Maintenance Improvements Estimated Cost B.3 Holiday Season Parking Strategies $ 35,000 E.3 New Elevator and Stair in South Ramp Maintenance $ 10,000 F.3 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System Maintenance $ 10,000 G.3 Power Washing on Annual Basis $ 30,000 G.4 Improve Sanitation $ 10,000 H.13 Automatic Irrigation System Maintenance $ 5,000 I.2 Escrow for Future Periodic Preventative Maintenance $ 100,000 Total Additional Annual Maintenance Cost $ 200,000 7. METHOD OF FINANCING The estimated costs for the 50th & France Parking and Wayfmding Project proposed to be financed through a combination of assessments, parking permit revenues, and other city funds. The following is a summary of the estimated funding amounts from each of the proposed financing sources: Capital Cost Financing Source Amount Assessments Other City Funds Total $ 3,310,000 $ 2,375,000 $ 5,685,000 Additional Annual Maintenance Cost Financing Source Amount Assessments Parking Permit Revenues Total $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 Annual operations and maintenance costs have been in the range of $250,000 per year for the past few years. The Additional Annual Maintenance Cost of $200,000 is in addition to the historic average cost. Parking permit revenues are the best funding source for future periodic preventative maintenance, not annual operations and maintenance which are assessed, since periodic preventative maintenance can be a significant spike in the annual assessed maintenance costs. Rebates for installing energy efficient light may be available from Xcel Energy to offset a portion of the cost of the lights. The amount of rebates offered by Xcel vary from time to time and would be determined at the time of design and construction. The property owners' share of the capital and maintenance costs will be funded by assessments in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. A preliminary assessment roll is attached in Appendix E. 26 8. PROJECT SCHEDULE If the City Council chooses to accept this report and proceed with the improvements, we recommend that the following project schedule be followed: City Council Receive Feasibility Report, Call for Public Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Final Plans and Specifications January 21, 2014 Public Hearing, City Council Orders Project , Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Ad for Bids February 18, 2014 Bid Opening May 22, 2014 Assessment Hearing / Award Contract June 3, 2014 Edina Art Fair June 6 -8, 2014 Start 2014 Construction June 16, 2014 Interim Construction Completion October 2014 2014 Holiday Shopping Season Nov -Dec, 2014 Start 2,015 Construction March 2015 Edina Art Fair June 2015 Construction Complete October 2015 The focus of construction in 2014 would be the dynamic wayfinding system, lighting upgrade, pedestrian access improvements, streetscape improvements, parking structure repairs and preventative maintenance. In order to mitigate impacts to businesses during construction, construction of the new stair and elevator core for the South Ramp and interior and exterior ramp painting is assumed to occur in 2015. The resulting project construction schedule will be longer than if all work is completed concurrently. 9. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the analysis completed as a part of this feasibility report, the 50`h & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements are feasible, necessary, and cost effective. We recommend the following: A. The Edina City Council accept this feasibility study and report on January 21, 2014. B. After receiving the appropriate staff reports, the Council must decide whether to proceed with the project and on the final scope of the proposed improvements. C. If a decision is made to proceed with the project, the Council must authorize the preparation of final plans and specifications for the improvements. 27 APPENDIX A - EXHIBI'T'S 28 AUTO CLUBm, GNP P ST $ 3 i vi v, W us w 39 th ST a C 39th ST. a �V� W. 39th Sl i i� i� z_ a W. 40h k a < ST. a a a a a a a<< o m voi W. a < 4D th ST ZI- �t2 < gt• a:.o z 0 a 1 w o j W. vi a 41 at ST. a HARRIET P/�yi,. 59. O �i S S 6 2 Q' ¢ a a a ST W m \ m � z W. 42 nd ST. 41 et P w ° ,1� a 42 nd ST. Lu $ p nd a 't7f -C d 9` z< s s S 42 . ST. a u LJ ST.. a a Y o " TTI& 3 kS W 43rd z 3 {z� g m S o DEVAN 3` �! OCQO ' I X k $ a �6 m H q A 1441 42 nd �+ ST. 0 W. th ST. MON i MDRNINGSID w,BR� Ja Lake >c ST� �1r.:. 2 6 y �• IN W. 45 th �F a Harriet m $x o p0 ��2 SS• W. 45th 1. t; xx, m W N us vi 14 vi ui of _46th • MINNEAPOLI S � SUNNYgDE TD WNE y PROJECT 3 1990 POP. 368,383 W. �' a� LOCATION ST 105. CROMWElL CT. ST. oo a RD. c m WE ST. B RIDGE LA.- m ,3 o 48th . W. 48th S T ,ily i �' $ `ci 0 °¢ ii vi EST* RD. 14. z YIOCI l �i z � __ W 49th v1 ui K - t 2 CLUB C.-I. uS ui vS 17. 5O th iST _. 21 W a ST a a 3 < < I ST. 11. MOORE SE u W -CE < 51 et` .° TY 1 a W. a a 51 et SL a € z z o z a a s Pte'' 12. LAURA AVE PL. 7< = 13. CASCADE LA. W� f a o o< ha - 14. MILLPOND PL GL EN z < o kj m y z a y G 15. E SUNNY SLOPE R . W 52nd 10 rJ.� 16. EDCEBROOK PL. i1 ti k m 52 nd Si. p Ea m £ 17. EDINA.CT. iJ T .CIR. 18. HILLTOP LA. a a W ry a 53 th ; S ST. z 3 .1 o ° th rc ? CB RO R ix o S $ p z x c 19. GRANGE RD. _ - ST 20. sHERwooD RD. 'i K CROM PINEWOOD R W ;�CI910ND GO O BOBBINS 3WwD �+ 02 NOD]HLLm 60R p © m a ST. a > ST. AV E e x a a gWQ KENT - Q OAKS DR. Y1• 55 11� ST & c G iii a C W. i S 55 th ST a -. -E f th ST A— 9 x x x< ST a 55th 5 � d t* LEXMG TON IL DE1" ry� a YV ONNE TER. WIN W..tgl 56 th r� _ `r W \� ST. W $ ° 58 th ST. V. ST. o W e O AK O ST. PL ' m �rcVIEIga� TOWER ST !� S � T SO L CONW ODD LAND RD v f d W 57th W cT5 0 57 th 5T o TER. PHILBROOK LA W. th ST 6S � W 58th m vi vS vi vi 58th ST-1 IV, Q ° 9 > GR1M TON i AVE a ° -C < < ES uS ,d vI x 59 ST. a ^ W. 59th ST , 59 th ST. �/ W. 59 th � q- ST. th 0 a .m SCHOCLW RD 60 th ST. < C104� o m W. a 60 th ST< V. 8� st ST. m Y p; c �` �1 > 3 a> 6Lk r Slot 8 �' �ALItY a Z 8 x o = ST. 4 W. 61 st ST. 10 < +1. W. 5L > z st z c3 a W. 8, Sv y� At� yECH ST. 62nd OWE]'t Gu ; g us j S 3 ST z W. 62 Q R0.F RVE nd ST. W' nd A. AV, AV. 33. W.Ild 152 nd ST. Q rc HERITA ST 62 V. 62 W, 62 n �; 0 0 500 1000 2000 HORUMTAL SCALE IN FEET z IGmley -Horn 50th w9� A. 0 ,a LOCATION MAP and " '____'ales, Inc. `E~r )y 50TH & FRANCE IISTRICT FRANCE :� EN ONE 1� �, M. „a �3d�41W PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY St PAM. YOtNt3V1A 00114 FAR H0. 645 -MIS •„ � "c E D 1 N A EXHIBIT 1 �r.s.." 4C `^ } WEST 49TH ST. 1� —1 — NORTH I I I fi II (z- slutug WEST 99 112 ST. y I W ml DDLE X:: Lul J - - - --T -J r-1-- I I WEST 50i -.- "s_'Q"`� - - - - -- C — — - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- . -- — -- — — vi w a v 0 ` Z W uj sue: J Q1. . ,nod I1, <• F, J, Imo. ilk Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 5 O L h FRANCE �� N E 0 1 N A INVENTORY OF EXISTING SIGNS I`RAMP PARKING ARMING %lowq -m PAtING PARKING - DIRECTIONAL 13 PEDESTRIAN - KIOSK DISTRICT MARKER (WITH NO REFERENCE TO PARKING) PARKING - IDENTITY JT...,.._..,1 1•tw. -•Itn � ,C1s�t Oeu 1 ftn.Aw.- `ll +t� t t mutt Rr 1A14111� 114111 n1 i s I V41 !r'�^ —^ ifT 0111► I PARKING r:ARAr_F PEDESTRIAN - WALL MOUNT 0 45 90 180 HORIZONTAL NORTH SCALE IN FEET EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING PLAN 50TH & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY EXHIBIT 2 01/03/14 WEST 49TH ST. „ JIJ— ;- , N E 49 1 /2 S ■ a y a `,r g a' j jWllu Nil Lu • r uj I i LL Z RL — J— L - - - -'� LLI L -- °---- _ : - i t - - -- — ` WEST 50th ST. °¢ ILI I7Y i I d x Ij ;• I: � - - -__— 0 ,0 r— I:. I II - Z I I I II •.... F1' I , Q __j II r---- AM R; " °.sue I ■ -''' PROPOSED PARKING SIGNS _ es DYNAMIC PUBLIC PARKING DIRECTIONAL SIGN (QTY — 4) WITH REAL -TIME PARKING AVAILABILITY .`y �'1 t DYNAMIC PUBLIC PARKING RAMP ENTRY SIGN (QTY — 3) I a WITH SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR PATRONS ENTERING RAMP STATIC PUBLIC PARKING WAYFINDING SIGN (QTY — 8) WITH RAMP NAME AND DIRECTIONAL ARROW 0 as 90 180 - - -- - - -'- - t• - HORIZONTAL NORTH SCALE IN FEET 5oth wog , PROPOSED PUBLIC PARKING SIGNS Kimley -Horn o e '; ti 50TH & FRANCE DISTRICT ❑�❑ and Associates, Inc. FRANCE erg.;` °' PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY E D I N A � =ti- EXHIBIT 3 01/03/14 WEST 49TH ST. REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPE, REPLACE .� WITH PAVERS aii1` r F —I r WEST 49 V2� p MIDDLE 1 II W ilf` 'q 1 ! RAMP t? 1. <.L �' • -6 _ la RECENT PLANTER IMPROVEMENTS PLANTING BEDS DECLINING / OUTGROWN II IZI j Ii of I I I 1a' 0 _ ti u- p L — I_ _ —L 4 Q°_ - - -- -- - - - — - -- , WEST 50•th ST, 1 o TREE, PERENNIAL, !!!I s '" Cl) & IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS Ig In j COMPLETED 2012 ill ! � -- �:� �4; I i i "--1 L a I a z I'p O ff • F - - -__- L - -JI r Iql Lam; r — t — .. _ } ��- SOUTH J II i II RAMP DETERIORATING CONCRETE PAVERS DAMAGED / DECLINING STREET TREES JI j0'r 1 y i I C P Z LEGEND - - I I , .- lit - : r.I A EXISTING CONCRETE PAVERS IN FAIR TO GOOD CONDITION APPROX. 14,000 SF I i I - F- ! 1 e , EXISTING CONCRETE PAVER SIDEWALK AREA W/ LOW TO MODERATE PRIORITY REPLACEMENT .............. APPROX. 36,500 SF r� EXISTING CONCRETE PAVER SIDEWALK AREA W/ HIGH PRIORITY REPLACEMENT ........... ............................... APPROX. 23,300 SF PEDESTRIAN AREAS WITH IMMEDIATE SAFETY AND /OR ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES (AREA INCLUDED IN SF OF HIGH PRIORITY REPLACEMENT) PUBLIC PLAZA SPACE ............................................ 1 ............................................................................ ............................... APPROX. +! 500 SF PLANTING BED (INCLUDES 100% OF SHRUBS & PERENNIALS REPLACED AND 25% OF TREES REPLACED) TREE IN TREE GRATE (INCLUDES A TOTAL OF 15 TREES REPLACED & ADJUSTING ALL TREE GRATES) - - - - -- LIMITS OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM (INCLUDES WIRES IN SHARED CONDUIT PROVIDED FOR FUTURE AUDIO SYSTEM) 0 45 90 180 HORIZONTAL NORTH SCALE IN FEET th AL 1 STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN r=pl Kimley -Horn Go e u'1 50TH & FRANCE DISTRICT and Associates, Inc. (FRANC Ve� - .��.;' PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY � F ri. EXHIBIT 4 -- 12/23/13 a O Trash enclosure screening wall inside Ramp Level 1 e ¢x r I t Trash enclosure screening wall MIDDLE RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 50TH & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY EXHIBIT 5 Icimley -Horn th X95 ^rte and Associates, Inc. 2550 1161iOMW A1E VEST. 9U11E 13si TEL N0. (651) 646 -4197 kFRANCE rJ • s �° .ay ST. PAUL, NNIMMA 6614 FAX NM (6SI 646 -6116 EUINA '`u O Trash enclosure screening wall inside Ramp Level 1 e ¢x r I t Trash enclosure screening wall MIDDLE RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 50TH & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY EXHIBIT 5 r - - New Stair/ Elevator Tower Trash enclosure screening wall Kimley -Horn CMFI 50th �9�r� o e SOUTH RAMP IMPROVEMENTS and Associates, Inc. FRANCE F� �C y 50TH &FRANCE DISTRICT �A`A W,:'"'E 2"' AX M QOM �, a E 6 1 N A PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY EXHIBIT 6 ° •t-/ 4 0 go SF p- or---rpA(- 5f FE L1- • • hEtwll:e ALLeY Arr vU �c� i • 57 s-ra L4S AT MOFL7T tk EX TEf-! O 2 fin A „S UNWIEe- Corra-!z o►- S-rrLt4f-- rage feovC-- ° Vd'6Nf�OW,$ Tt� 507,,7s-f- Ar✓O A`aS 7" �cN�EYT B p2- LEve:--f I �lL'tc 1!'�E7 ftPP�T/�N R8n`JE P--I;-T;41 L fyP -�vnJD C�t//�L I P L-V.qiV -o m - - Trflt'G�r7 Bovnid��Y I s�- c�TvRE r �I_ Fl Icimley -Horn 50th � H e m and Associates, Inc. 8CHANCE r(�y o J900 VNI1FR91Y AYE. E44 S�IE 7]eN SL GAIL. MPNN A ee114 M- N0. eel eld -fi% FAX Ne. eel e46 -mle E D 1 N A •,.,� �• �XISTtnI& No? ---rH �-AMp NORTH RAMP CONCEPT 50TH & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING STUDY EXHIBIT 7 APPENDIX B - RAMP ASSESSMENT PHOTOS 36 Photo No. 1: Concrete Deterioration on Deck Surface Photo No. 2: Crack in Concrete Beam W, = l i .z r 37 Photo No. 3: Traffic Membrane Failure � J k 1" Photo No. 4: Concrete Spall and Corroded Reinforcement 38 .r Photo No. 5: Concrete Spall and Rust Staining 39 APPENDIX C - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • 2012 Streetscape Feasibility Report • Summary of Property Owner and Business Owner Group Meetings • Parking Improvement Idea Survey (Business Owners and Property Owners) • Menu of Alternatives • Parking and Transportation Survey (Customers) 40 w�9e I Feasibility Study o Engineering Department City of Edina " <<>NVitrCf iacu 50"' and France District Streetscape Improvements Draft: April 9, 2012 A. Project Limits: The limits of this Feasibility Study are generally described as the 2 -block area of the 50th and France commercial and residential district. It is defined by the public streets of Halifax Avenue to the West and France Avenue to the east; West 49 -1/2 Street to the north and W. 51s' Street to the south. The limits of improvements are generally contained within the street rights -of -way, but are also proposed for the shared public access ways and pedestrian alleys within the district. (See Figure 1) B. Initiation & Issues: The 50th and France District Streetscape Improvement project was initiated by the Engineering Department following conversations with the districts' business owner group, who identified two general categories of work; 1) repair existing streetscape elements, and 2) install new streetscape elements. The overall purpose of the request and this project is to make the necessary improvements to help maintain this unique, high - quality commercial and residential community asset. The specific purpose of the repairs is to address both safety and aesthetic concerns, and the specific purposes of the new elements is to reduce maintenance time and costs, enhance customer and resident experience, and improve aesthetics. T'Ll - a �4 f rs srt'. � � M a ,Ne• AW M- y . -. ,.,, wr ,sy -s* *1a d4._. ..e. ~ .. ... :� ' . wrr•". -R a .., ,+- +' • y MW It 1 Limits of Seasonal Lighting 4 I . +. _ r Limits of Streetscape Improvements F\ +' . h — �-E, -..� .. _ _ . > i i . _ Figure 1: Project Area and Improvement Delineation The following are issues related to the existing streetscape and pedestrian alleys which have been identified in determining the feasibility of this project, and are addressed within this report: • Deterioration of the existing concrete paver sidewalk pavers • Continued care and long term viability of plant materials • Replacement of plant materials due to condition and appropriateness • Consideration for upgraded facilities that enhances customer experience C. Existing Conditions: Many of the district's streetscape and pedestrian access way improvements were either reconstructed or newly installed in 1990, making them nearly 20 years old. These elements include street and pedestrian lighting, bollards and bollard lighting, specialty entrance monuments and wayfinding signage, raised planters, movable planters, a fountain, raised planters with trees and shrubs, at -grade foundation plantings of trees and shrubs, street trees planted in pits with tree grates, benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, newspaper corrals, concrete paver sidewalks, decorative handrails and fencing systems. A majority of these improvements can generally be described as being in good condition. As addressed within this report, the following items fall under category 1) repair existing streetscape elements: 1. Concrete Paver Sidewalks: Approximately 35% of the current total sidewalk area is in need of replacement for primarily safety reasons. Pavers in these areas are in varying stages of failure, but in general present an unsafe surface for pedestrians. The failure is most likely attributed to an underlying drainage issue. The existing pavement section includes concrete pavers on 1" of leveling sand and a 6 " +/- concrete underslab. There are no drains or means to remove water that accumulates on top of this concrete underslab. Therefore, deicing salt in combination with standing water has resulted in paver decomposition, from the bottom of the paver up. Over the last few years, Edina staff has either replaced pavers or temporarily patched the voids with asphalt at the removed pavers. (See Figures 2 and 3). Figures 2 and 3: Typical Concrete Paver Sidewalk Areas in Need of Repair 2. Street Trees: For the purposes of this report, street trees are identified as trees located within the street boulevard or within the pedestrian alleys, and planted in pits with tree ! ® Kimley -Horn Page 2 of 10 i►. ®I and Associates. Inc. grates. These trees are watered primarily by rainfall, but sometimes watered manually by city staff during drought conditions. The district does not have an automatic irrigation system for these trees or any other plantings within the public rights of way. There are approximately 80 street trees within the project. A majority of the trees are in reasonable condition, but approximately 15% require replacement due to damage from vehicles and vandalism, disease, sun scald, insects, lack of moisture and air, and a combination of all of these factors. Some street trees have reached the capacity of their tree grates ring openings, others have split trunks or large areas of bark removed, deformed, in general decline, or damaged in some way. Other trees are growing irregular and leaning towards buildings. (See Figures 4, 5 and 6) Figure 4: Damage at Trunk Figure 5: Damaged Leader Figure & In Decline 3. Other Landscaping: Other plantings exist within the district beyond street trees, and for this report are identified as those in raised planters or at -grade (building foundation) planting beds. The plants in these areas, like street trees, are only watered by rainfall and the occasional manual watering by city staff. Many of the trees in these planting areas are in reasonable condition. However, approximately 25% require replacement because they have either outgrown their location and usefulness in their location, are leaning toward a building or pedestrian area, or have damage in some way. A majority of the ground plane plantings are shrubs, with some perennial plantings. While most are in reasonable condition, they have either outgrown their location or been damaged and need replacement. It is estimated that all shrubs and perennials will require replacement. (See Figures 7, 8 and 9). Kimley -Horn and Associates. Inc. Page 3 of 10 Figure 7: Outgrown Location Figure 8: Trees Leaning Figure 9: Shrub Replacement D. Business Owner and Community Involvement: Edina staff has met with the 50th and France district business owner group a number of times to review these issues and opportunities for improvements. Also, a neighborhood meeting was held on March 22, 2012, where the project was also reviewed by adjacent residents. E. Proposed Improvements: Two streetscape improvement design options were explored. The primary difference between the options center around the provisions of an automatic irrigation system in lieu of manually watering plantings. The first option included the installation of conduits through directional boring methods, where irrigation lines and potential future system audio wires are routed. The second option provided the audio system through a less protected wire - routing system and irrigation that required manual watering at multiple times during the growing season. Because of long term maintenance and overall cost effectiveness, the first option (automatic irrigation system) was the preferred option by both city staff and representatives of the 50th and France business owner group and is therefore included within this feasibility report. Based on a draft Feasibility Study dated August 25, 2009, the first project for landscape improvements was implemented in 2010. The four raised planters along 50th Street were replanted with shrubs and perennials, and a few of the existing trees were replaced. Drip irrigation tubing was installed within the beds along with temporary irrigation plumbing connections provided. This project has established the landscape design character for future work within the district. (See figures 10, 11 and 12). . Figure 10: Irrigation Provisions Figure 11: Planting Operations Figure 12: 50th Street Planters Considering parking ramp reconstruction timing issues, the landscape improvement project may need to be installed in multiple phases, in multiple years. It is anticipated that the next phase could be installed in spring /summer of 2013. This would primarily include the landscaping surrounding the middle parking ramp. The following describes the improvements, by categories of work, in the areas as shown on the project master plan: Kimley -Horn Page 4 of 10 and Associates. Inc. Repair Existing .Streetscape Elements ■ Paver Sidewalks: Replace approximately 35% of the existing sidewalk paver areas which have a high priority need of replacement, per the master plan. It should be noted that this feasibility report only considers the replacement of the pavers within the high priority replacement areas, as shown within the master plan. ■ Paver Sidewalks: Provide concrete underslab drainage for all concrete paver areas (see'attached detail) ' Street Trees: Replace approximately 15% of the existing street trees (see attached plant material list) ■ Other Landscaping: Replace approximately .25% of the existing trees and all of the shrubs and in the planting beds. Provide new planting design that includes a combination of shrubs and perennial plantings, for increased seasonal color and interest: (See attached plant material list). Install New Streetscape Elements ■ Irrigation System: Install an automatic underground irrigation system to all landscape areas within the district. This will require directional boring under sidewalks and driveways to access irrigated areas with electric valve wires and water supply piping. (see attached detail) ' Seasonal Lighting: Install lighting assemblies for seasonal and possibly year -round interest. Three different design options were explored: 1) pole mounted fixtures, 2) garland and light strings between light poles, and 3) string lights between buildings. The preferred option is a combination of three above, which includes installing new dedicated poles on opposing sides of the street on 75 foot centers, on which strings of lights would be mounted spanning the roadway. The current proposed location is at West 50th Street only, which includes nine pairs of poles and light strings. ' Miscellaneous: The existing granite -clad raised planters on the south side of the middle ramp will require removal, salvage and reinstallation due to ramp reconstruction work. It is anticipated that this work will be included within the ramp reconstruction project. Landscape and irrigation renovations are included within this feasibility study, however. F. Project Costs: The preliminary opinion of probable costs for the total project is $844,815.40, which includes a combined 30% contingency and soft cost factor. Funding for the project will be through special assessments, with a 20 year pay -back period currently identified. G. Assessments: An approximate special assessment of $ per assessable square foot of each business located within the 50th and France District is proposed. The justification for assessment is attributed to the. District's request for improvements and the properties receiving benefit of the improvements, and is established in accordance with the City of Edina Special Assessment Policy dated August 16, 2005. ® Wey -Roth Page 5 of 10 m ❑ and Associates. Inc. H. Project Schedule: The following schedule has been identified for this project: Receive Feasibility Report Public Hearing Bid Opening Award Contract Begin Construction Complete Construction I. Feasibility: Staff believes that the implementation of this project is necessary, cost effective, feasible and necessary to maintain the investments put into the 50th and France district. J. Attachments: 1. Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs 2. Landscape Materials List 3. Preliminary Design Details: • Pavement Drains • Street Tree Irrigation 4. District Streetscape Improvements Master Plan ®� Kimley -Horn Page 6 of 10 and Associates. Inc. 50th and France District Feasibility"Study.Streetscape Improvements ,Preliminary Opiniowof l?robable Costs City of Edina 'atr;r111; 2012 No ITEM UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL DIRECTIONAL BORING / CONDUITS 1 4"- 41/2" diameter bore, pulled conduits: LF 5,000.00 $ 30.00 $ 150,000.00 (1)1 -1/2" dia. PVC for irrigation piping; (2) 3/4" dia. Poly - (1) for Audio cable; (1) for Irrigation wire Subtotal $ 150,000.00 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2 Drip irrigation system, plumbing and electrical connections, and LS 1 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 controller for irrigating all street trees, at grade and raised planters LANDSCAPE 3 50th Street Raised Planters (already constructed) 4 Street Trees (assumes 15% of existing require replacement) 5 Trees in Planters (assumes 25% of existing require replacement) 6 ■ Shrubs 7 ` Perennials 8 ` Groundcover 9 Miscellaneous Removals, Mulch PAVERS & PAVER SLAB THROUGH- DRAINAGE 10 4 "X8" Concrete Paver, High Priority Replacement Area 11 2" PCV, 2 -3' long, filled with pea rock, @ 2' OC in paver areas (5,300' length / 2' interval = 2650) SEASONAL LIGHTING 12 Seasonal Light Poles (50th Street only): pair on roadway at 760C = 9 pairs 13 Seasonal Light Strings (9 crossings) ■ Assumes all planters (except 50th St. raised planters) shown on plan are replanted. Total area = 4,850 SF ® ® Krnley -Horn f® and Associates. Inc. Subtotal $ 75,000.00 LS 1 $ 25,783.00 $ 25,783.00 EA 10 $ 500.00 $ 5,000.00 EA 8 $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00 EA 300 $ 35.00 $ 10,500.00 EA 650 $ 15.00 $ 9;750.00 EA 575 $ 15.00 $ 8,625.00 LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal $ 66,658.00 SF 21,900 $ 8.00 $ 175,200.00 EA 2,650 $ 40.00 $ 106,000.00 Subtotal $ 281,200.00 EA 18 $ 2,500.00 $ 45,000.00 LS 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00. Subtotal $ 751000.00 SUB TOTAL $ 649,858.00 309/6 Soft Costs and Contingency $ 194,957.40 TOTAL 14 '844,815.,40 Page 7 of 10 50th and France Streetscape Improvements Landscape Materials List Trees • Skyline Honeylocust • Discovery Elm • Common Hackberry • Ivory Silk Lilac Shrubs • Dwarf Korean Lilac • Viburnum • Yew • Rose • Fragrant Sumac • Spirea Perennials and Ornamental Grasses • Daylily (mix) : Baja, Stella de Oro • Black -Eyed Susan • Purple Coneflower • Aster • Sedum • Yarrow • Lavender • Feather Reed Grass • Little Blue Stem • Pachysandra • Jolly Bee Geranium • Hosta • Little Bluestem. • Prairie Dropseed Miscellaneous Landscape Materials • Mulch — shredded hardwood • Planter soil — Mn /DOT select topsoil borrow with amendments (compost and fertilizer) • Weed control — Preen or equivalent pre- emergent (in. lieu of weed barrier fabric) El111111110 ® Krnley -Horn Page 8 of 10 ® and Associates. Inc. EXISTING CONC. PAVER EXISTING SAND SETTING BED EXISTING CONC. UNDERSLAB FILTER FABRIC COVER 2 70 SCH. 40 PVC DRAIN 2' OC, FILLED w/ PEA ROCK . PAVEMENT DRAINS Jo Resolve Existing Concrete Underslab Drainage) City of Edina Ajf 50th and France District Improvements�� b April 11, 2012 El® ® Kimley -Horn Page 9 of 10 ® and Associates. Inc. POLY CONDUIT (FOR FUTURE AUDIO SYSTEM) POLY CONDUIT (IRRIGATION) 1 X- PVC CONDUIT W/1- POLY (IRRIGATION MAIN) DIRECTIONAL BORING /CONDUIT (INSET DETAIL) .00P DRIP LINE TREE GRATE FOR i, REINSTALL ILLY EXCAVATE AROUND TO ACCESS IRRIGATION NECT TO MAIN & WIRES .Y LATERAL 0 I N BORE, (SEE INSET DETAIL) ---I. CENTER OF DIRECTIONAL BORE W /EDGE OF TREE GRATE STREET TREE IRRIGATION DETAIL (At Existing Trees in Tree Grates) City of Edina 50th and France District Improvements a ' ��( As �o atm Im April 11, 2012 p ❑ IOmley -Hom Page 10 of 10 and Associates. Inc. 50TH /FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING PROJECT PROPERTY OWNER /BUISINESS OWNER GROUP MEETINGS SUMMARY Kimley -Horn and Associates Inc. conducted meetings with property owners and tenants in the 50th/France District, to present information about the 501h/France Parking and Wayfinding project and to give property owners and business owners an opportunity to provide input on the project. Nine small group meetings were conducted between October 14 and October 17, 2013. Edina property owners were contacted by phone to coordinate a plan for reaching out to their tenants. Tenants were invited by their landlords, by the 50th & France Association, in person by Kimley -Horn staff and via email. Minneapolis tenants were invited by the 50th & France Association, in person by Kimley -Horn staff and via email. Meetings were established in groups of about a dozen property owner and tenants from the same geographic area in the district. Meeting times were selected based on accommodating a majority of respondents preferred meeting times. An alternative meeting date was offered the week of October 21, 2013 for those that didn't or couldn't make one of the meetings the week of October 14, 2013, but no property owners or business owners took this option. Each meeting followed the same format and agenda. Meeting attendees signed in, picked up a handout (attached) and a meeting agenda (attached). Kimley -Horn led the meeting, starting with introductions and an overview of the project development process. The majority of the meeting time was spent reviewing the menu of alternatives being considered for the project, which were presented in the format of an optional survey that each attendee could take on -line after the meeting. Note that the survey was also given to all of the business owners and property owners in the 50th & France district via email, regardless of whether they attended one of these meetings. All of the meetings were held at the Lunds Community Room. Meetings generally ran at least one hour and most took the full hour and a half. The following summarizes the property owner and business owner meetings, including meeting attendees and key meeting comments, and includes the comments that were received as part of the on -line survey. Meeting #1- Monday October 14,2013,8:00 AM Dee Drazenka Abram & Dee Tailors Barb Janisch Janisch Studio Comments: • Additional signage should be provided to direct clients to 2nd floor businesses. • The existing pedestrian wayfinding signage is effective but could be improved. • Use color scheme naming convention for the ramps (blue ramp, orange ramp, etc.). Coordinate the ramp color naming convention with nearby buildings for simplicity (red building, blue building, etc.) Would provide businesses an easy way to direct clients to nearby parking. A colored ticket could be provided at exit points from parking ramps to help uses remember what ramp and what level their car is parked on. • Way-finding could use icons and symbols as well as color (murals, sculptures, etc.) • Commercial redevelopments sites present opportunity for art gallery which will help Edina become an "art destination." • If revenue control is proposed, excited about the new technologies available. (e.g. parking apps for phones, credit card operated) • Has the District considered any bike rental stations? • Tenants have been asked why there aren't elevators in all the ramps. • Should consider skyways connecting ramps. These make it easy for people to understand where they are going. • Covering the alleyways and routes from businesses to ramps would improve winter and rainy day environment. • Idea to make employee parking only on the top ramp levels and cover them was well received. • 49 12 St should look more like 50th Street. • Could open areas be used for live performers? (music, dance, art, etc.) • Security systems should be implemented in the ramps. Meeting #2 - Monday October 14,2013,9:30 AM Tony Johannes 49.5, LLC Rachel Thelemann 50th & France Association Comments: • Parking for businesses along 4912 Street is not a problem. • Commercial redevelopment of the properties acquired by the city would improve the district and the feel of 49 % Street. PA • Edina Realty employees are parking in north ramp, since their permits are valid through April, even though their office moved to the northeast corner of 50th and France. • Concerned that assessments will drive tenants away. • Why isn't the City of Edina contributing to the ramp costs? • Valet parking could be an option for the district. • The idea of adding light weight covers to the top levels of parking ramps, and designating. these stalls for employees, was well received. • Added security would be a good idea for nighttime employee safety (lights, cameras, etc.) • Avoid ramp expansions, add surface parking and wayfinding and then see if ramp expansion is actually needed. • What is best solution for smoking areas? Bespoke parking lot has been used by other 50th & France businesses as the area for their smokers. • Ramp upgrades need to happen. Spend what is needed, don't just "bandaid" the problem. This is a high end shopping district. • It's not fair for the Minneapolis property owners and tenants to not have to pay for the ramp improvements. • Create 50th Street feeling on 49 Yz Street. • Elevator is essential to have in all ramps. Meeting #3 - T Kit Avery Linda Engler Kris Waggoner Michael Frey Steve Anderson John Novachis Comments: uesday October 15, 2013, 8:00 AM Dana's Englier Studio Interior Design Heidi Brandenburg DDS Edina Art Gallery Rice Paper J. Novachis - The Men's Collection • Construction is likely to occur in 2014 and 2015. • Tenants recommended using simple wayfinding signage. A "5 -year old" should be able to read and understand the system. • Wayfinding signs should not be overly crowded with words to keep things simple. • A tenant requested the opportunity to meet with designers. The tenant commented that if the tenant is paying for the improvements, the tenant should get more say in the design. • Is the potential for Lunds to move locations being considered for this project? Are we wasting money doing this now, or should we wait for Lunds to move? • The color ramp naming convention was discussed and liked. • Tenants requested adequate time to review the preliminary assessment roll to evaluate their budgets and understand if they assessments are okay. • An ADA section should be added to the survey. • Current district layout does not lend itself to elderly pedestrian traffic (stairs, no elevators, 2nd floors not easily accessible) • Can we increase the width of stalls? Complaints about stall width has been a concern. • Building a parking ramp over the Clancy Lot will negatively affect businesses south of the parking lot (Dana's, etc.) • Need Edina and Minneapolis to come to an agreement regarding the assessments on property owners. Meeting #4 - Tuesday October 15, 2013, 9:30 AM Monica Stangler Haugland Company Bryce Baker Edina Travel Leaders Comments: • Will there be multiple parking ambassadors for the holiday season? • Middle ramp bottom level is full before any businesses open. This indicates an employee parking compliance problem. • It's a common complaint to hear that customers cannot find anywhere to park. • Smart phone technology and parking apps will not be used much by the elderly customers. This may be a wasted investment. • Elderly customers need better access throughout district. • City should do a better job with ramp maintenance. _ • Drainage piping in middle ramp needs repairs (safety issue) • If parking is not easy and free, shoppers will go Southdale instead. • There needs to be a solution to parking ticketing. People come to spend the day in the area and have an experience. They need to be able to park in locations for longer periods of time. The current enforcement is too stringent. Meeting #5 - Wednesday October 16,2013,8:00 AM Eric Pellinen Edina Liquor Merrily Smith Lunds Rachel Thelemann 50th & France Association Comments: • Delivery tunnel to the municipal liquor store is no longer used • How is project evaluating the potential relocation of Walgreens or Lunds? • During the holidays, employee parking is a major problem. 4 • 1 hour parking near liquor store is not working. People are parking as long as they please. • Some people believe that the south ramp is owned by Lunds and can only park in it if shopping at Lunds. • People assume ramp parking is not free and do not even bother entering the ramps. Consider adding free parking signs to the exterior of ramps. • Some employee only parking areas (lower level of South ramp, US Bank lot) are available for customer parking during weekends and at night. This needs to be communicated better. • People believe parking is illegal on surrounding neighborhood streets. People think they will be towed if they park in front of people's houses. This creates more parking problems in the ramps. • Heated bus shelter by Lunds would promote bus commuting. • Employ an off -site parking lot with shuttle for employees to use. • Increased lighting and security cameras were recommended. • More police monitoring is requested. The ramps are a common spot for teenagers to hangout. • Adding elevators to the South and Middle ramps were discussed. There were complaints of slippery stairs. • The ramps need to be kept up better. The condition of the ramps was called "embarrassing." • The idea of music along the pathways throughout the District was well received. • The idea of murals within the ramp were well received. Meeting #6 - Wednesday October 16,2013,9:30 AM Tony Smith Rep. For Hooten Cleaners Soon Park Hooten Cleaners Jenny Park Hooten Cleaners Comments: • The perception is that Lunds bought and still owns the Clancy lot. • Additional parking of 140 - 200 stalls is the goal for the project. The City taking a property when there is still debate on parking need is unfair. • Are there options being considered that do not use the Hooten Cleaners property? • There is a lack of compassion by the City to take the Hooten Cleaner property if they only plan to build a surface parking lot. • Is the Lunds move being considered in the parking analysis? • The Park's have signed leases for two tenants to move into the Hooten Cleaners site. How can the City take the property when businesses are going to open? • South ramp is always full. • Why is there no sidewalk along the south side of 49 1a Street? 5 The ground level of the middle ramps is always full in the morning. The spots are not open for customers. Meeting #7 - Thursday October 17, 2013,12:00 PM Stan Saddoris Knapp Properties (Walgreens) David Miller R.F. Moeller Jewelers Monica - Stangler Haugland Company Barbara La Valleur Edina Art Committee Rachel Thelemann 50th & France Association Julie Boehm 50th & France Association Tyler Lineburg Cocina Del Bario Julie Boosalis Cos Bar Alan Ackerberg Salut, Mozzi Mia Stephanie Shimp Edina Grill Comments: • The majority of the current permit costs for employee parking fund the yearly ramp maintenance. • Walgreens has similar private parking problems with Lunds. More ramp /public parking is needed help businesses with private lots. . • Previous bad experiences with parking have caused customers to not return for future shopping trips. • The parking policy should accommodate an all -day trip to the district and understand that multiple trips to different stores are common. • Minneapolis employees cannot purchase permits to park in the Edina ramps. • Employees are taking advantage of the lack /difficulty of parking enforcement and parking where they please. • Would employee parking off -site, with shuttle service, during the art fair and holiday seasons be effective? • There is not a need for more parking ramps. This area has much better parking than the majority of other Twin Cities urban shopping areas (St. Paul, uptown, etc.) • Is the shopping in the District "destination" or "casual" shopping? Understanding this question should guide the parking solution. • There have not been conversations about creating an art gallery or making 50th & France an art destination directly. • Pavers are not a good idea in this climate due to potential for heaving during frost. • The idea of convertible spaces was introduced. How can we create areas in the district that can be used for parking and also be converted to parks, event areas, market areas and others? • Can we close 50th Street from Halifax to France Avenue and make it an urban park (pop -up park)? This type of idea is used widely across the United States. • The ramps do not need to be expanded. We need a "fundamental cultural change" in the way employee parking is managed. Meeting #8 - Thursday October 17,2013,1:30 PM Laura Steffes Upper Midwest Management Mary Koppes OSKA Nancy Heidman n'etc Rachel Thelemann 50th & France Association Julie Boehm 50th & France Association Comments: • The Minneapolis property owners will fight strongly against paying for any part of this project. • Is the Lunds move being evaluated as a part of the parking study? This move will have major impact to parking in the district. • Employees in the Pinehurst building are not fully utilizing the underground employee parking in the Pinehurst building. • The Pinehurst building property has an agreement with the church north of the district for employee parking. • Even when parking permits for the Ewing Lot are offered, employees decline. Offering Minneapolis employees permits to park in the Edina ramps will likely receive the same response from employees. • Has connecting the north and middle ramps with an overpass over 4912 Street been considered? • Better pedestrian safety is needed inside the ramps. The stairwell door in the South Ramp creates major safety issues. People are almost hit by cars frequently. Better signage for cars to drive slowly and keep watch for pedestrians is needed. • People do not know about the Ewing Lot and it is underutilized by customers. • As winter comes and it gets dark earlier, better ramp security lighting could be needed. Meeting #9 - Thursday October 17,2013,3:00 PM Bob Sykes Kalysbro Co. Inc. Comments: • Employee parking in the District has been a problem since the 1960s. • North and Middle ramps kill sidewalk shopping on 49 12 Street. • There is a shortage of office space in the district. Expansion of north ramp should include some office space instead of retail. • How is the Lunds move being studied for parking impacts? • The lighting levels and lighting color should be evaluated to increase safety. • Decorative lighting does not provide added safety benefits. 7 • Improve the pedestrian entrances and exits to the ramps to make them more aesthetically pleasing. Once inside the ramp, people are less focused on aesthetics and more focused on finding a parking spot. • The exterior stairs on the south side of the Middle ramp should be designed with landings and with longer treads. • No clocks or benches should be added to the District. These features deter shopping. • Treat sidewalks, alleys. and pedestrian routes as "pedestrian streets." Name "pedestrian streets and allow businesses to have secondary addresses on the "pedestrian streets." Work with Google maps to recognize the "pedestrian streets." • Create a plaza south of the middle ramp. • Pedestrian plazas should have all landscape, art and other features around the perimeter, not in the center. Do not block pedestrian areas. • Add commercial display windows on the ground floor of the parking ramps. • Plant the median along the Halifax /491/2 Street curve. • The City of Edina public works staff should not be performing repairs to specialty items in the area (e.g. pavers). There should be an on -call contract with a contractor to repair these items. Patching broken paver areas with asphalt is not acceptable. • Irrigation is needed in the area. • On- street parking along 51St and Halifax will slow traffic effectively to increase roadway safety. Comments Received Via On -Line Survey - October 14 - 27, 2013 Parking Ramp Expansion Comments: • Optimize existing parking through use of state of the art real -time way finding signage, reducing employee parking and increasing use of public transit. The Edina Realty and Hooten sites should be redeveloped as retail /commercial, not parking • I think that the South Parking ramp needs attention. The majority of traffic that moves through the area'are people who shop at Lund's and use the medical offices and retail stores (i.e. Starbucks, Breadsmith, The Optical) in the 50th and France building. There should definitely be a plan for the expansion of the south ramp. • More substantial rework of all properties in the E - W line from Walgreen's through the Post Office. Include commercial space, condos, and parking ramp. • First try to solve parking issues by maximizing current options & better handling employee parking. • Forget 2,3,and 4 for now Customer Parking Comments: • Valet only for restaurants No paid parking • Add sidewalk along south side of 49 -1/2 Street if on- street parking provided there, as well as cross -walks similar to those on W. 50th St. 0 • Encourage retail businesses to offer online ordering with in -store pick -up (and purchase) to speed up customer parking turnaround. • Have dynamic signage upon entry to area directing to best possible scenario for an individual's needs. • No paid parking or off site employee parking Oct 18, 2013 12:23 PM • The north ramp is rarely if ever full. I don't see parking as being at full capacity although the 50th and France shopping district IS at full capacity. Parking won't get worse from here. Add the ramp:by Hootens Dry Cleaners to add 100 or 200 more parking stalls and we should have plenty of parking for the next 10 - 20 years Employee Parking. Comments: • Our employee cannot get to work on the bus, and they live too far to bike • Bicycle parking should be an integral part of the public spaces, not in the parking ramps. Work with MTC to improve ridership • Include some bicycle parking closer to destinations outside of ramps. Idea is to bicycles preferential convenience over cars. Good bike racks critical - none that require slots for wheels (bent wheels a common problem with these), Upsidedown "U" shaped pipe set in concrete best. • Incentivize biking or bus rides for employees. Find off site shuttle service. • Don't designate the north ramp as the only ramp for employee parking. All employees would then park in that ramp and businesses near the north ramp would suffer from lack of customer parking • How can we get Business Owners to enforce employee parking rules? Parking Ramp Lighting and Security Comments: • Add decorative and indirect lighting to the functional lighting • I never feel unsafe in Edina ramps, not sure if these steps are really necessary. • Do not replace functional lighting with decorative or indirect lighting. Instead, put such lighting at pedestrian entry /exit locations. Festoon lighting at car and ped entry and exit locations. Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access Comments: Make pedestrian access points to ramps more human scale and less "clinically functional ". Need visual richness (detail - perhaps even retail display cases) at right angle to lines of sight to accomplish this. Warmer white lights. Human scale architectural detail to frame entry openings. Note: If you add elevators, accessible parking can be spread through the ramps. This is better than having large numbers of empty accessible spaces on the first levels at non -peak hours, which is needlessly annoying to able- bodied parking users. Downtown Minneapolis can handle skyways because of the intensity of pedestrian traffic. We aren't Minneapolis CBD. Skyways dilute pedestrian traffic and dampen shopping by spreading traffic thinly rather than concentrating it past ground level display windows. Focus on snow free paths and canopies at pedestrian entries (for opening umbrellas). 9 Decrease handicapped stalls in north ramp as they NEVER get used- also, should only have handicapped stalls on first level of ALL ramps as the other floors NEVER get used Parking Wayfinding Comments: • "Ambassadors" should be much more than just providing directions to parking • Need to name pedestrian ways and name wider gathering areas as "squares" with signage similar to street name signage. Encourage businesses to use the pedestrian way names as their street address. Work with Postal Service to make that happen. Contact Google Maps to get them to put pedestrian streets in their database. • Current signage is adequate • Have parking ramps be a canvas for creativity both outside and inside not only using color coding for different floors; also implementing artistic signage; using wall art to reflect Edina history /culture /interests • Like the idea of giving the ramps "color coded" names for easy identification and giving of directions. • Like the idea of color identifying the ramps with increased signage Parking Ramp Aesthetics Comments: Fix central stair to first level of central ramp to have outdoor riser -tread ratio. Stair is too steep for outdoor comfort. Use switch -back if necessary. Maintenance needs to be on -going rather than just every few years Streetscape Comments: Latest retail area design thinking is to NOT use unit pavers. Tripping hazard draws shopping attention away from display windows. Also, maintenance always seems to be awful when units pop out or break. Use lightly patterned; colored concrete instead. Less seating outdoors away from shopping windows (need to keep people moving past windows) - don't really need another fountain. Maybe just sculpture instead, at the edge of the plaza, not the middle. Close 50th St during summer to create a plaza w /stage, events & farmer's market etc... Have artistic benches, seating areas, bus stops, sidewalk poetry, public place making that puts a smile on people's faces and makes them happy; happy people spend more $$ Parking Ramp Repair Comments: • All repair options are equally important. Do all repairs. • Please don't close a ramp until another is built. Closing an entire ramp would cause significant revenue loss to businesses 10 City of Edina - 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding ProjectSurvey to Rank^ SurveyMonkely Parking Improvement Ideas 1. Please rank the following PARKING RAMP EXPANSION ideas from 1 =Most Important to 4 =Least Important 1 of 18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 Average Count Add surface parking on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites 31.0% (9) 17.2%(5) 31.0%(9) 20.7%(6) 2.41 29 with possible parking ramp construction in the future Add parking ramp on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites with 27.6%(8) 34.5%(10) 27.6%(B) 10.3%(3) 2.21 29 commercial space at ground level Add parking ramp on Edina Realty, Hooten Cleaner and Clancy Lot 24.1%(7) 27.6%(B) 27.6%(8) 20.7%(6) 2.45 29 sites with commercial space at ground level Add parking ramp on new sites without integrated commercial 17.2%(5) 20.7%(6) 13.8%(4) 48.3%(14) 2.93 29 space on ground level answered question 29 skipped question 4 1 of 18 2. If you feel the list of PARKING RAMP EXPANSION ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 5 answered question 5 skipped question 28 2of18 3. Please rank the following CUSTOMER PARKING ideas from 1 =Most Important to 8 =Least important Holiday season parking strategies; Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Average Count 89.3% 32.1%(9) 14.3%(4) 0.0%(0) Free customer parking 10.7%(3) 7.1%(2) 3.6%(1) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 1.14 28 28 offsite employee parking Encourage turnover at prime customer spaces using posted time 3.6%(1) 4 17.9%(5) 10.7%(3) 10.7%(3) 7.1%(2) 7.1%(2) 0.0%(0) 3.32 28 0.0%(0) (12) (12) 3.6%0) 32.1%(g) limits and / or meters 17.9%(5) 21.4%(6) 14.3%(4) Holiday season parking strategies; additional parking ambassadors and 7.1%(2) 21.4%(6) 32.1%(9) 14.3%(4) 0.0%(0) 7.1%(2) 10.7%(3) 7.1%(2) 3.79 28 offsite employee parking Valet parking 0.0%(0) 3.6%(1) 3.6%0) 32.1%(g) 7.1%(2) 17.9%(5) 21.4%(6) 14.3%(4) 5.54 28 Access control and paid parking in South and Middle Ramps with 2 or 3 -hour free parking. Validation 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 7.1%(2) 7.1%(2) 25.0%(7) 21.4%(6) 17.9%(5) 21.4%(6) 6.00 28 program for additional time at business expense. Add short term parking for 3 customers or deliveries on south 0.0%(0) 14.3%(4) 17.9%(5) 14.3%(4) 14.3%(4) 3.6%(1) 0.0%(0) 4.29 28 (10)° side of 49 -1/2 Street Add short term parking on north 0.0%(0) 7.1%(2) 17.9%(5) 14.3%(4) 10.7% 3) 21.4% (6) 21.4% (6) ° () 5.14 28 side of 51 st Street () ( 7.1 /0 2 Add meters to on- street parking 50.0% 0.0%(0) 3.6%(1) 0.0%(0) 7.1%(2) 10.7%(3) 10.7%(3) 17.9%(5) 6.79 28 both in Edina and Minneapolis (14) answered question 28 skipped question 5 3of18 4. If you feel the list of CUSTOMER PARKING ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 6 answered question 6 skipped question 27 4of18 5. Please rank the following EMPLOYEE PARKING ideas from 1 =Most Important to 9 =Least Important 5of18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 Average Count Leave employee parking as -is; Top 4 2) 19.2% two levels of North Ramp, bottom 7.7%(2) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 7.7%(2) 7.7%(2) 3.8%(1) 7.7%(2) 3.08 26 (12) (1 (5) ) and top level of South Ramp Employee parking in North Ramp, 1 2 15.4% 19.) 113) top of Middle Ramp and bottom 0.0%(0) 7.7%(2) 7.7%(2) 0.0% (0) 3.77 26 (3) (3) (7) (7) (4) (5) (3) level of South Ramp Require all employees to have a 26.9% 19.2% 23.1% 11.5% 3.8%(1) 3.8%(1) 0.0%(0) 3.8%(1) 7.7%(2) 3.23 26 parking permit (7) (5) (6) (3) Graduated employee parking rates: Free in North Ramp, moderate fee 15.4% 15.4% 23.1% 34.6% 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 3.8% (1) 7.7% (2) 0.0% (0) 6.12 26 for Middle Ramp, largest fee for (4) (4) (6) (9) South Ramp Add light- weight roof over top level 15.4% 11.5% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% of parking ramps to add covered 7.7%(2) 0.0%(0) 7.7%(2) 7.7%(2) 4.54 26 (4) (3) (3) (7) (3) employee parking Dedicated motorcycle and bicycle 11.5% 26.9% 19.2% 26.9% 0.0% (0) 7.7% (2) 3.8%(1) 3.8%(1) 0.0%(0) 4.73 26 parking area in all ramps (3) (7) (5) (7) Add bike lockers and shower room 11.5% 19.2% 19.2% 15.4% 26.9% 3.8%(1) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 3.8%(1) 6.92 26 to encourage bike commuting (3) (5) (5) (4) (7) Add car- sharing program to 11.5% 38.5% 34.6% encourage biking, walking and 0.0%(0) 3.8%(1) 7.7%(2) 0.0%(0) 3.8%(1) 0.0%(0) 6.65 26 (3) (10) (g) transit Install heated bus shelters along 11.5% 11.5% 11.5% 23.1% 15.4% 50th & France with real -time "Next 3.8%(1) 7.7%(2) 7.7%(2) 7.7% (2) 5.96 26 (3) (3) (3) (6) (4) 5of18 dus in n rounuMs siynaye answered question 26 skipped question 7 6. If you feel the list of EMPLOYEE PARKING ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 6 answered question 6 skipped question 27 6of18 7. Please rank the following PARKING RAMP LIGHTING AND SECURITY ideas from 1 =Most Important to 8 =Least Important 7of18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Average Count Increase brightness of lighting 64.0% 20.0%(5) 4.0%(1) 12.0%(3) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 1.64 25 Hire a parking ambassador 8.0%(2) 20.0%(5) 4.0%(1) 12.0%(3) 8.0%(2) 8.0%(2) 12.0%(3) 28.0%(7) 5.04 25 Add video surveillance in critical 40.0% 4.0%(1) 28.0%(7) 16.0%(4) 12.0%(3) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 3.04 25 areas of all ramps (10) Install "panic" stations with direct communication to police 4.0%(1) 12.0%(3) 20.0%(5) 8.0%(2) 16.0%(4) 20.0%(5) 8.0%(2) 12.0%(3) 4.72 25 department Replace functional lighting with 0.0%(0) 4.0%(1) 4.0%(1) 16.0%(4) 12.0%(3) 16.0%(4) 24.0%(6) 24.0%(6) 6.00 25 decorative or indirect lighting Add video surveillance in all areas 16.0%(4) 4.0%(1) 8.0%(2) 8.0%(2) 24.0%(6) 8.0%(2) 20.0%(5) 12.0%(3) 4.84 25 of all ramps Add video cameras in smaller 0.0%(0) 4.0%(1) 16.0%(4) 16.0%(4) 12.0%(3) 28.0%(7) 12.0%(3) 12.0%(3) 5.28 25 alleyways and sidewalks Increase foot patrols (police, ambassadors and / or night 4.0%(1) 8.0%(2) 4.0%(1) 12.0%(3) 16.0%(4) 20.0%(5) 24.0%(6) 12.0%(3) 5.44 25 escorts) answered question 25 skipped question 8 7of18 8. If you feel the list of PARKING RAMP LIGHTING AND SECURITY ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 3 answered question 3 skipped question 30 8of18 9. Please rank the following PARKING RAMP PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ideas from 1 =Most Important to 8 =Least Important 9of18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Average Count Designate more accessible parking stalls on first level of all parking 13.6%(3) 27.3% (6) 9.1%(2) 13.6%(3) 13.6%(3) 9.1%(2) 13.6%(3) 0.0%(0) 3.68 22 ramps Easily identified pedestrian zone to and through parking ramps using 27.3%(6) 18.2%(4) 18.2%(4) 18.2%(4) 13.6%(3) 4.5%(1) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 2.86 22 floor paint, curbs and bollards New elevator / stair in Middle Ramp 13.6%(3) 18.2%(4) 22.7%(5) 27.3%(6) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 9.1%(2) 0.0%(0) 3.41 22 New elevator / stair in South Ramp 18.2%(4) 13.6%(3) 18.2%(4) 13.6%(3) 22.7%(5) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 3.64 22 High visibility crosswalk lighting at 0.0%(0) 18.2%(4) 18.2%(4) 22.7%(5) 9.1%(2) 27.3%(6) 4.5%(1) 0.0%(0) 4.23 22 SE stair exit at South Ramp Add speed bumps or tables near 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 0.0%(0) 13.6%(3) 36.4%(8) 31.8%(7) 4.5%(1) 5.73 22 pedestrian routes Skyway to connect Middle and 63.6% 13.6%(3) 0.0%(0) o 4.5 /0 1 () 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) o 4.5 /0 1 () 13.6%(3) 6.59 22 North ramp buildings (14) Reconstruct stairwells in South Ramp to be compliant with current 9.1%(2) 0.0%(0) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 22.7%(5) 9.1%(2) 22.7%(5) 27.3%(6) 5.86 22 building code answered question 22 skipped question 11 9of18 10. If you feel the list of PARKING RAMP PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 10 of 18 11. Please rank the following PARKING WAYFINDING ideas from 1 =Most Important to 6 =Least Important 11 of 18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Count Static public parking directional 43.5% (10) 30.4%(7) 17.4%(4) 0.0%(0) 8.7%(2) 0.0%(0) 2.00 23 signage throughout the district Static pedestrian directional signing 17.4%(4) 52.2%(12) 13.0%(3) 8.7%(2) 4.3%(1) 4.3%(1) 2.43 23 to businesses and public ramps Dynamic public parking directional signage throughout the district with 26.1%(6) 8.7%(2) 43.5%(10) 17.4%(4) 4.3%(1) 0.0%(0) 2.65 23 real time parking availability Electronic pedestrian directional signing to businesses and public 8.7%(2) 4.3%(1) 13.0%(3) 52.2%(12) 8.7%(2) 13.0%(3) 3.87 23 ramps Create public parking and pedestrian navigation smartphone 4.3%(1) 4.3%(1) 4.3%(1) 17.4%(4) 56.5%(13) 13.0%(3) 4.57 23 app District ambassadors direct drivers 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 8.7%(2) 4.3%(1) 17.4%(4) 69.6% 16 ( ) 5.48 23 to available parking answered question 23 skipped question 10 11 of 18 12. If you feel the list of PARKING WAYFINDING ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 6 answered question 6 skipped question 27 12 of 18 13. Please rank the following PARKING RAMP AESTHETICS ideas from 1 =Most Important to 9 =Least Important 13 of 18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Average Count Paint all interior & exterior surfaces 36.4% 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 2.50 22 of all ramps and trash enclosures (8) (4) (4) (4) 18.2% 18.2% 13.6% 18.2% Entry and exit hospitality signs 9.1%(2) 4.5%(1) 9.1%(2) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) 4.50 22 (4) (4) (3) (4) 13.6% 18.2% 13.6% 31.8% Power washing on a quarterly basis 9.1%(2) 0.0%(0) 4.5%(1) 9.1%(2) 0.0%(0) 4.09 22 (3) (4) (3) (7) 13.6% 13.6% 13.6% 27.3% Improve sanitation p 9.1%(2) 9.1%(2) 4.5%(1) 4.5%(1) o ( ) 4.5 /0 1 4.45 22 (3) (3) (3) (6) Unify public parking with colors, 22.7% 22.7% 22.7% 13.6% 4.5% (1) 4.5% (1) 9.1% (2) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 3.95 22 signs, door colors, elevator lobbies 9 (5) (5) (5) 3) 22.7% 22.7% 18.2% Add public art, murals, plants 9.1%(2) 4.5%(1) 9.1%(2) 4.5%(1) 0.0%(0) 9.1%(2) 5.95 22 (5) (5) (4) 27.3% 45.5% 13.6% Information items / advertising 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 4.5%(1) 9.1%(2) 7.55 22 (6) (10) (3) Screen all garbage areas, 22.7% 27.3% 18.2% 0.0%(0) 9.1% (2) 4.5% (1) 4.5% (1) 4.5% (1) 9.1%(2) 4.91 22 implement recycling centers (5) (6) (4) Unify public parking aesthetic with 13.6% 50.0% 0.0%(0) 4.5%(1) 0.0%(0) 9.1%(2) 4.5%(1) 9.1%(2) 9.1%(2) 7.09 22 exterior skins (3) (11) answered question 22 skipped question 11 13 of 18 14. If you feel the list of PARKING RAMP AESTHETICS ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 2 answered question 2 skipped question 31 14 of 18 15. Please rank the following STREETSCAPE ideas from 1 =Most Important to 12 =Least Important Rating Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Average Count 34.8% 26.1% 8.7% 13.0% 8.7% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Replace dead /dying trees 2.70 23 (8) (6) (2) (3) (2) (0) (2) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 17.4% 34.8% 13.0% 13.0% 8.7% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% Replace broken pavers 3.39 23 (4) (8) (3) (3) (2) (0) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) (1) Add sidewalk to south side of 49- 8.7% 8.7% 17.4% 21.7% 0.0% 4.3% 17.4% 4.3% 8.7% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.13 23 1/2 Street (2) (2) (4) (5) (0) (1) (4) (1) (2) (2) (0) (0) Beautify entrance to South ramp o 13.0% 0 0.0% 0 21.7/0 0 8.7/0 0 13.0% 0 8.7/0 0 13.0% 0 4.3/0 0 8.7/0 0 0.0% 0 8.7/0 0 0.0% with landscaping pots or seating 5.30 23 (3) (0) (5) (2) (3) (2) (3) (1) (2) (0) (2) (0) plaza Add growing vegetation with colorful 0 0.0 /0 0 4.3 /0 0 0.0 /0 0 13.0 /0 0 17.4 /0 0 26.1 /0 0 4.3 /0 0 21.7 /0 0 4.3 /0 0 0.0 /0 0 8.7 /0 0 0.0 /0 flowers walls on South Ramp 6.43 23 (0) (1) (0) (3) (4) (g) (1) (5) (1) (0) (2) (0) southern exposure Reconsider use of brick pavers and replace with product with greater 17.4% 4.3% 8.7% 8.7% 13.0% 17.4% 4.3% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0% 8.7% 8.7% 5.65 23 longevity and lower maintenance (4) (1) (2) (2) (3) (4) (1) (0) (2) (0) (2) (2) cost Convert loading alley between Spalon and Middle Ramp to a 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 8.7% 13.0% 4.3% 17.4% 8.7% 4.3% 13.0% 8.7% 13.0% 7.61 23 decorative plaza that (0) (1) (1) (2) (3) (1) (4) (2) (1) (3) (2) (3) accommodates larger vehicles Add outdoor music in select plazas 0.0% 8.7% 8.7% 4.3% 0.0% 13.0% 8.7% 30.4% 13.0% 4.3% 0.0% 8.7% 7.09 23 and "quiet' alleys (0) (2) (2) (1) (0) (3) (2) (7) (3) (1) (0) (2) Create pedestrian plaza near 51st 4.3% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 8.7% 17.4% 8.7% 4.3% 26.1% 13.0% 8.7% 4.3% 7.74 23 St. entrance to South Ramp (1) (0) (1) (0) (2) (4) (2) (1) (6) (3) (2) (1) 15 of 18 Add small fountain with seating 4.3% 0.0% 8.7% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3% 0.0% 8.7% 8.7% 26.1 %, 13.0% 13.0% 8.26 23 area near Clancy Lot (1) (0) (2) (1) (2) (1) (0) (2) (2) (6) (3) (3) Add planted median, where 0.0% 8.7% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 8.7% 0.0% 17.4% 13.0% 34.8 %, 4.3% 8.65 23 possible, along 49th 1/2 Street (0) (2) (0) (1) (1) (1) (2) (0) (4) (3) (8) (1) Traffic calming at intersection of 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 4.3% 13.0% 0.0% 21.7% 8.7% 43.5% 10.04 23 51st and Halifax (0) (0) (1) (0) (1) (0) (1) (3) (0) (5) (2) (10) answered question 23 skipped question 10 16. If you feel the list of STREETSCAPE ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 4 answered question 4 skipped question 29 16 of 18 17. Please rank the following PARKING RAMP REPAIR ideas from 1 =Most Important to 3 =Least Important 17 of 18 Rating Rating 1 2 3 Average Count Make necessary improvements to structural and functional elements 66.7%(14) 33.3%(7) 0.0%(0) 1.33 21 of the parking ramps Make necessary repairs to to aesthetic elements of parking 9.5%(2) 38.1%(8) 52.4%(11) 2.43 21 ramps Make preventative maintenance repairs to prolong service life of 23.8%(5) 28.6%(6) 47.6%(10) 2.24 21 parking ramps answered question 21 skipped question 12 18. If you feel the list of PARKING RAMP REPAIR ideas above does not include an important idea for the City to consider, please enter it here: Response Count 2 answered question 2 skipped question 31 17 of 18 19. Your contact information: Name: Response Response Percent Count 100.0% 22 Company: 100.0% 22 Email Address: 100.0% 22 Phone Number: 90.9% 20 answered question 22 skipped question 11 20. Any additional comments? 18 of 18 Response Count 7 answered question 7 skipped question 26 MENU OF ALTERNATIVES - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COSTS 1/15/2014 1 of 4 U a a E E E E E E E m E a E: —' m Z m c E i MENU OF ALTERNATIVES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST NOTES/ ASSUMPTIONS F f g F i f f d d w 3 9 ESTIMATE 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 f a f G a a d m 7 A PARKING RAMP EXPANSION CAPITAL ANNUAL Y Y Y Y Y A.1 Add parking ramp on Edina Realty and Hooten Leaner sites with commercial space at $ 12,000,000 Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites; Includes escalation to 2015 ground level Y Y Y A.2 Add surface parking on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites with possible parking ramp $ 350,000 Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites; Does not include future parking ramp cost; construction in the future Assumes about 20 stalls on Hooten and 30 stalls on former Edina Realty Add parking ramp on Edina Realty, Hooten Cleaner and Clancy Lot sites with commercial $ 16,000,000 Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites; Includes escalation to 2015 space at ground level Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites; 3 level expansion on Hooten Cleaners and Y Y A.4 Add parking ramp on new sites without integrated commercial space on ground level $ 5,000,000 Edina Realty sites B CUSTOMER PARKING Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y D.1 Free customer parking $ No cost associated with this option Y Y Y Y 8.2 Encourage turnover at prime customer spaces using posted time limits and / or meters $ 25,000 Assume meters for Edina on- street parking (40 stalls) and only signs in the ramps Add two ambassadors from Nov 1 through January 15 from 7:30am - 7:30pm; Offsite Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 8•3 Holiday season parking strategies; additional parking ambassadors and offsite employee $ 35,000 employee parking on weekdays only during shopping season; Employees use 125 U5 Bank parking stalls during weekends during holidays Y 8.4 Add short term parking for customers or deliveries on south side of 491/2 Street $ 10,000 Add signs and pavement markings; Does not include street, sidewalk or curb work Y Y Y Y Y B.5 Add short term parking on north side of 51st Street $ 10,0001 Add signs and pavement markings; Does not include street, sidewalk or curb work Y B.6 Valet $ 250,000 Four valet stations; Operates year round 10am - 10pm; Assume valet parking in ramps, parking except during holiday season. Y B.7 Access control and paid parking in South and Middle Ramps with 2 or 3 hour free parking. $ 50,000 Employee parking controlled by prox card and gates. No "ticket spitters" or controls for Validation rogram for additional time at business expense customer parking. Add meters to onstreet parking both in Edina and Minneapolis $ 50,000 Assume 40 on- street stalls in Edina and 40 on- street stalls in Minneapolis C EMPLOYEE PARKING Y Y Y C.1 Leave employee parking as is: Top two levels of North Ramp, bottom and top level of South $ - No cost if parking is left as is Ramp Y Y Y Y C.2 Require all employees to have a parking permit $ No infrastructure cost, only enterprise cost Y Y Y C.3 Employee parking in North Ramp, top of Middle Ramp and bottom level of South Ramp $ 10,000 Add signs and pavement markings Y Y C.4 Add lightweight level $ 6,700,000 Standing seam metal roof over entire ramp footprint. Does not include structural roof over top of parking ramps to add covered employee parking. modifications to existing structures. Y Y Y Y C.5 Dedicated motorcycle and bicycle parking area in all ramps $ 15,000 Add signs and pavement markings Y Y Y Y C.6 Install heated bus shelters along 50th & France with realtime Next Bus In X Minutes signage $ 500,000 Assumes four 4'x 10'shelters Y Y Y Y C.7 Graduated employee parking rates: Free in North Ramp, moderate fee for Middle Ramp, $ - Assumes no additional cost largest fee for South Ramp Y Y C.8 Incentivize public transit use by free bus passes and optimizing bus routes with MTC $ - 30 pairs of lockers per ramp - shower facility is included as tenant build out in 2,000 SF north Add bike lockers and shower roam to encourage bike commuting $ 700,000 ramp new commercial space - 2 ADA showers, 2 ADA toilets, plus retail for coffee or other limited food 1/15/2014 1 of 4 MENU OF ALTERNATIVES - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COSTS 1/15/2014 2 of 4 E d E w E w E v E u E d E ka A E R E E °�% � MENU OF ALTERNATIVES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST NOTES/ ASSUMPTIONS g g g g g d m w m a ESTIMATE 6 6 d f $ a a ka m 7 6 d 6 6 G 1 D PARKING RAMP LIGHTING AND SECURITY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y D.1 Increase brightness of lighting $ 650,000 One for one replacement of fixtures with motion sensing LED Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y D.2 Add video surveillance in critical areas of all rams $ 300,000 License plate readers and stairwell cameras Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y D.3 Install "panic stations with direct communication to police department $ 50,000 Two emergency hones per level of ramp totaling 20 Add video surveillance in all areas of all rams $ 750,000 Full camera coverage in all ramps including license plate readers Y D.5 Hire a parking ambassador $ 60,000 Add ambassadorfrom 7:30am - 7:30 pm Add cameras to street lights, packing ramps or other public structures; Assumes conduit and wires for power and data are installed as part ofsidewalk reconstruction for landscape / Add video cameras in smaller alleyways and sidewalks $ 300,000 streetscape projects; Surface restoration costs need to be accounted for elsewhere; Assumes 20 cameras Y Y D.7 Increasefoot atrols(police, ambassadors and /or night escorts) $ 50,000 Add one art-time night escort for entire year. functional lighting decorative indirect lighting $ 400,000 One for one replacement of fixtures except first level of South Ramp which would reduce the Replace with or number of fixtures. E PARKING RAMP PEDESTRIAN ACCESS Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y E.1 Easily identified pedestrian zone to and through parking ramps using Floor paint, curbs and bollards $ 100,000 Assumes four locations Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y E.2 New elevator / stair in Middle Ramp $ 925,000 Assumed on south side of ramp located at midpoint in east -west direction. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y E.3 New elevator/ stair in South Ram $ 1,100,000 Y Y Y Y Y Y E.4 Designate more accessible parking stalls on first level of all parking ramps $ 10,000 Additional signs and pavement markings Y Y Y Y Y Y Y E.5 High visibility crosswalk/lighting at SE stair exit at South Ramp $ 15,000 Assumed 2 lighted signs and striping Y E.6 Add speed bumps or tables near pedestrian routes $ 75,000 Assumes removal of concrete and build up of speed bum Y Y Y Y E.7 Reconstruct stairwells in South Ramp to be compliant with current building code $ 450,000 Includes the SE (center) stairs Skywaytoconnect Middle and North ramp buildings $ 1,350,000 Assumes skywalk supported independent of existing structures. Unheated space. F PARKING WAYFINDING Y F.1 Static public parking directional signage throughout the district $ 25,000 12 decorative non - electronic parking wayfinding signs with ramp name and directional arrow Y Y Y Y Y Y F.2 Static directional businesses $ 50,000 24 decorative non - electronic pedestrian wayfinding signs with "pedestrian street," pedestrian signing to and public ramps "pedestrian plaza" and ramp names and directional arrows 4 decorative electronic parking wayfinding signs with real -time parking availability, one for Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y F.3 Dynamic public parking directional signage throughout the district with real time parking $ 350,000 each major approach roadway; 3 decorative signs, one at each ramp, with special message availability for patrons entering ramp; 8 decorative non - electronic parking wayfinding signs with ramp name and directional arrow 8 decorative electronic interactive pedestrian wayfinding kiosks; 16 non -electronic Electronic pedestrian directional signing to businesses and public ramps $ 200,000 pedestrian wayfinding signs with "pedestrian street," "pedestrian plaza" and ramp names and directional arrows Full service e- commerce parking website to purchase permits, get real -time parking Y Y F.5 Create public parking and pedestrian navigation smartphone app $ 250,000 availability, pay fines, etc...; Smartphone app with turn -by -turn directions to parking ramp; Smartphone app to mark parking location to aid pedestrian wayfinding back to vehicle Y Y F.6 District ambassadors direct drivers to available parking $ No additional cost; Ambassador costs covered under other line items 1/15/2014 2 of 4 MENU OF ALTERNATIVES - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COSTS s a a a u a 0# a a Z E E ai w E w E v E a v a v a E a E E 3 o� MENU OF ALTERNATIVES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST NOTES / ASSUMPTIONS ESTIMATE 6 6 6 d 6 6 a s m 4 S S. G PARKING RAMP AESTHETICS y y y y y y Y Y Y Y V G.1 Paint interior & $ 1,375,000 Includes power washing prior painting, two coats of paint. Excludes exterior of middle and all exterior surfaces of all ramps and trash enclosures p north ramps. y Y Y Y Y y G.2 Unity public parking with colors, signs, door colors, elevator lobbies $ 50,000 Wall painting (images, words and / or color) unique to each parking ramp and parking level y y y y y y y Y y y y G.3 Power washing on a quarterly basis $ 100,000 Annual cost. Includes stair wells and ramps. Basic power washing like done in 2013. Y y y y y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y G.4 Improve sanitation $ 10,000 Annual cost. Weekly cleaning of stairwells. City currently spending $6,000 per year. Y V Y Y Y Y Y Y Y G.5 Entry and exit hospitality signs $ 25,000 Expansion of signs in 2013 three total enclosure walls - (2) at Middle Ramp, (1) at South Ramp - prefabricated abs Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y G.6 Screen all garbage areas, implement recycling centers $ 60,000 plastic or steel panel system with painted steel posts, gates, hardware - panels are patterned to look like louvers, brick or wood slats and can be custom color Y G.7 Add 50,000 Public art, murals and plants within the parking structure, in addition to "unifying" colors, public art, murals, plane $ signs, etc... above I Metal mesh or metal panel skin with supporting structure covering exposed elevations of Y Y G.8 Unify 600,000 South, Middle and North Ramps with painted steel panel with (8) 4'x6' display cases integral public parking aesthetic with exterior skins $ with skin on each ramp. Add $900,000 for stainless steel with (8) 65" LCD panels in outdoor cases on each ramp Make exteior pedestrian facing ground level of parking ramps feel like storefronts by adding Y G.9 Information items /advertising $ 75,000 display cases for businesses to advertise - this number also included in low and high values for skin improvements 1/15/2014 3 of 4 MENU OF ALTERNATIVES - ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COSTS 1/15/2014 4 Of 4 W d d d d d 0 E Y E m w w aEi v m E W E �' MENU OF ALTERNATIVES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST NOTES/ASSUMP TIONS g g i i i m m v w 3 ESTIMATE 6 d 6 d 6 6 6 i i a a v 6 G m H STREETSCAPE Y Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y H.1 Replace dead / dying trees $ 25,000 15 trees @ @500 each and fix all tree grates 30,000 SF (40% of total paver area) @ $8 SF paver installation plus thru- drainage tubes and Y Y Y y y y Y Y y H.2 Replace broken pavers $ 500,000 ea -rock in underslabs Y Y y Y y Y H.3 Add sidewalk to south side of 49 1/2 Street $ 50,000 200 LF x 8 FT: Concrete pavers to match existing: 1600 SF @ $8 SF Y y Y Y y H.4 Beautify landscaping 80,000 500 SF integrally colored, textured concrete plaza with 3 benches and tables, trash entrance to South ramp with pots or seating plaza $ receptacles, bicycle loops, screen walls and overstory trees (LS) Reconsider use of brick pavers and replace with product with greater longevity and lower $ 1,500,000 Integrally colored, textured concrete as replacement for all pavers maintenance cost Y H.6 Add growing vegetation with colorful Rowers walls on South Ramp southern exposure $ 250,000 160 LF x 4o FT = 6400 FSF @ $25 SF: Green Screen mounted to face of ramp, ivy planting: Y H.7 Add in "quiet" $ 120,000 LS Assumption per May 2009 estimate. Requires directional boring cost share with irrigation outdoor music select plazas and alleys work Y H.8 Convert loading alley between Spalon and Middle Ramp to a decorative plaza that $ 300,000 Open paver plaza with landscaped edges and decorative lighting accommodates larger vehicles Create 51st St. South Ramp $ 80,000 500 SF integrally colored, textured concrete plaza with 3 benches and tables, trash pedestrian plaza near entrance to receptacles, bicycle loops, screen walls and oversto trees (LS) Y H.10 Add small fountain with seating area near Clancy Lot $ 80,000 LS Assumption Add 49th Y. Street $ 375,000 Assumes 12' raised median and 400' of street reconstruction, planter soil, trees and planted median, where possible, along perennials Traffic intersection 51st Halifax $ 100,000 Assumes 100' of curb extensions on each side of 51st at Halifax; No change to existing calming at of and crosswalk sign and lights New -Added 12/11/1 Y Y I lAutomatic irrigation system $ 175,000 New -Added 12111/1 Y Y I Y lRepair planter beds $ 50,000 I PARKING RAMP REPAIRS Y Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y Y 1.1 Make necessary improvements to structural and functional elements of the parking ramps $ 650,000 Concrete repairs, joints,drain replacement, etc. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1.2 Make preventative maintenance repairs to prolong service life of parking rams $ 650,000 Traffic membrane, deck sealer, etc. Y y Y Y Y Y 1.3 Make necessary repairs to to aesthetic elements of parking ramps $ 20,000 $ °o QQ 0 0 C 0 0 0 g 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 d 0 o 0 All estimated costs include 20%contin en and 30 %for indirect cost (design, construction contingency ( g U1 1A e h N N V1 N N N N N V) CAPITAL ANNUAL management, administrative costs, etc....) it L h f6 L tC 7t 7t S N a E a E a E a E a E a d a E a E a E iC m h m A A ;; MENU OF ALTERNATIVES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST NOTES / ASSUMPTIONS f i i i f i d ESTIMATE nQ5� dQ5� QaQ S Qd5� S Qay� S QaQ S S QaQ S QaQ S Qd5� S 5 Q35� 5 Q5� 25 Qm5� S g g g g g g g g g g S j N N N rgry�� N N N N N N N N N Z 1/15/2014 4 Of 4 60h & France Parking and Wayfinding - Customer Surveys -Field Collected / 4% SurveyMonkey KHA Input 1. Which one of the following applies to you? Response Response Percent Count Occasional 50th & France 37.2% 35 customer Regular 50th & France customer 30.9% 29 Employee of 50th & France 26.6% 25 Business owner or property owner 5.3% 5 of 50th & France answered question 94 skipped question 7 1 of 52 2. How familiar are you with 50th & France? Response Response Percent Count Very familiar ! 61.7% 58 Sorri0what familiar 1 1 26.6% 25 Somewhat unfamiliar ® 6.4% 6 Not familiar at all ! 0 5.3% 5 answered question 94 skipped question 1 2 of 52 3. How often do you come to 50th & France? skipped question 5 3 of 52 Response Response Percent Count 1 time per month 1 17.8% 16 2 times per month 15.6% 14 Once a week Q 13.3% 12 Twice a week 0 8.9% 8 Three times a week 23.3% 21 Every weekday 21.1% 19 answered question 90 skipped question 5 3 of 52 4. What transportation do you typically use to get to your destination gat 50th France? 4 of 52 Response Percent Response Count Drive 90.5% 86 Carpool Q 2.1% 2 Bus Fmil 3.2% 3 Walk Q 4.2% 4 Cab /taxi 0.0% 0 Other 0.0% 0 answered question 95 skipped question 0 4 of 52 5. If your occasionally use an alternative to driving, which mode(s) have you used in the past year? 5 of 52 Response Response Percent Count N/A 54.8% 51 Carpool 0 11.8% 11 Bus 0 9.7% 9 Walk 14.0% 13 Cab /taxi 0.0% 0 Other (please specify) 9.7% 9 answered question 93 skipped question 2 5 of 52 6. How many passengers are typically in your vehicle when you visit 50th & France? skipped question 20 6 of 52 Response Response Percent Count 1 54.7% 41 2 38.7% 29 3 2.7% 2 4 Q 4.0% 3 5 0.0% 0 6 0.0% 0 7 0.0% 0 8 0.0% 0 9 0.0% 0 More than 9 0.0% 0 answered question 75 skipped question 20 6 of 52 7. If you drive, do you typically park in the same location? Response Response Percent Count Yes 81.3% 74 No 18.7% 17 answered question 91 skipped question 4 7 of 52 8. If yes, where do you typically park? 8 of 52 Response Response Percent Count South ramp (Public ramp next to 42.3% 30 Lunds) Middle ramp (Public ramp next to 31.0% 22 Spalon Montage and Mozza Mia) North ramp (Public ramp next to 12.7% 9 Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaners) Clancy lot (Public lot next to O 5.6% 4 Talbots) Ewing lot (Public lot behind Arthur ❑ 1.4% 1 Murray Dance Studio) On- street 0.0% 0 Private lot ( Lunds, Walgreens, US Bank, BMO Harris, Pinehurst, 0 7.0% 5 etc...) answered question 71 skipped question 24 8 of 52 9. How long is your typical stay? 10. What is your home zip code? Response Response Percent Count ZIP: 100.0% 82 answered question 82 skipped question 13 9 of 52 Response Response Percent Count Less than 1 hour 0 11.0% 10 1 -2 hours 35.2% 32 2 -3 hours 20.9% 19 Greater than 3 hours 33.0% 30 answered question 91 skipped question 4 10. What is your home zip code? Response Response Percent Count ZIP: 100.0% 82 answered question 82 skipped question 13 9 of 52 11. How long did it take you to find an available parking space and park your, car? Response Count 89 answered question 89 skipped question 6 10 of 52 12. How would you rate the convenience of the parking stall you used today on a scale of 1 (inconvenient) to 10 (convenient)? 11 of 52 Response Response Percent Count 1 -Inconvenient Q 1.1% 1 2 ❑ 2.3% 2 3 Q 4.5% 4 4 Q 1.1% 1 5 8.0% 7 6 6.8% 6 7 11.4% 10 8 26.1% 23 9 13.6% 12 10 - Convenient 25.0% 22 answered question 88 skipped question 7 11 of 52 13. Did you know that there are three parking ramps and two surface parking lots available for public parking? Response Response Percent Count Yes 69.0% 60 No 31.0% 27 answered question 87 skipped question 8 14. Once you are parked, how easy is it to find and walk to your destination? Response Response Percent Count Easy 85.7% 72 Same as other shopping areas 0 13.1% 11 Difficult 0 1.2% 1 answered question 84 skipped question 11 12 of 52 15. 1 feel safe when I park at 50th & France Response Response Percent Count Yes 97.7% 85 No ❑ 2.3% 2 answered question 87 skipped question 8 16. In one word, how would you describe parking at 50th & France? Response Count 87 answered question 87 skipped question 8 13 of 52 17. If you could change one thing agout 50th & France parking, what would it be? 18. Do you feel that more parking stalls need to be added to the 50th & France district? Yes No 14 of 52 Response Count 75 answered question 75 skipped question 20 Response Response Percent Count 62.6% 57 37.4% 34 answered question 91 skipped question 4 19. Would addition of paid parking meters to promote turn -over of prime customer parking spaces be helpful? Response Response Percent Count Yes 26.7% 24 No 73.3% 66 answered question 90 skipped question 5 20. If valet parking were offered, is this a service you would use? Response Response Percent Count Yes 20.7% 18 NO 79.3% 69 answered question 87 skipped question 8 15 of 52 21. If there were a mobile application that provided parking data for the 50th & France district, would you use it? Response Response Percent Count Yes 41.1% 37 No 58.9% 53 answered question 90 skipped question 5 16 of 52 22. How much of the real cost of parking would you be willing to pay? All public parking in the 50th & France district is currently free parking. The property owners and business owners in the 50th & France district pay approximately $1,000 per year per stall to provide free parking (initial construction plus annual maintenance). 17 of 52 Response Response Percent Count $0 / hour 51.1% 45 $0.25 / hour 0 8.0% 7 $0.50 / hour 0 9.1% 8 $1 /hour 25.0% 22 $2/ hour Q 4.5% 4 $4 / hour 2.3% 2 answered question 88 skipped question 7 17 of 52 23. Would you consider using alternative modes of transportation (bus, bike, walk, etc...) when visiting 50th & France? Response Response Percent Count Yes 37.5% 33 No 62.5% 55 answered question 88 skipped question 7 24. Any additional comments? 18 of 52 Response Count 88 answered question 88 skipped question 7 Page 2, Q5. If your occasionally use an alternative to driving, which mode(s) have you used in the past year? 1 Bike Dec 27, 2013 8:50 AM 2 Bike Dec 27, 2013 8:38 AM 3 Bike Dec 27, 2013 7:37 AM 4 Bike Dec 27, 2013 7:05 AM 5 Bus, Bike, Walk Dec 26, 2013 2:13 PM 6 Bike Dec 26, 2013 1:12 PM 7 Bike Dec 26, 2013 1:07 PM 8 Drive Dec 23, 2013 2:11 PM 9 Walk and Bike Dec 23, 2013 2:00 PM 19 of 52 20 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? ZIP: 55408 ZIP: 55112 ZIP: 55422 ZIP: 55406 ZIP: 55426 ZIP: 55410 ZIP: 55424 ZIP: 55317 ZIP: 55414 ZIP: 55436 1 Dec 27, 2013 8:58 AM 2 Dec 27, 2013 8:56 AM 3 Dec 27, 2013 8:52 AM 4 Dec 27, 2013 8:50 AM 5 Dec 27, 2013 8:48 AM 6 Dec 27, 2013 8:46 AM 7 Dec 27, 2013 8:44 AM 8 Dec 27, 2013 8:38 AM 9 Dec 27, 2013 8:33 AM 10 Dec 27, 2013 7:59 AM 21 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? ZIP: 55424 ZIP: 55123 ZIP: 55337 ZIP: 55436 ZIP: 55410 ZI P: 55364 ZI P: 55447 ZI P: 55416 ZI P: 55424 ZI P: 55423 11 Dec 27, 2013 7:57 AM 12 Dec 27, 2013 7:37 AM 13 Dec 27, 2013 7:35 AM 14 Dec 27, 2013 7:30 AM 15 Dec 27, 2013 7:27 AM 16 Dec 27, 2013 7:25 AM 17 Dec 27, 2013 7:20 AM 18 Dec 27, 2013 7:16 AM 19 Dec 27, 2013 7:13 AM 20 Dec 27, 2013 7:09 AM 22 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? 21 ZIP: 55436 Dec 27, 2013 7:05 AM 22 ZIP: 55418 Dec 27, 2013 7:03 AM 23 ZI P: 55419 Dec 27, 2013 7:02 AM 24 ZIP: 55345 Dec 27, 2013 6:52 AM 25 ZIP: 55405 Dec 26, 2013 2:34 PM 26 ZIP: 55347 Dec 26, 2013 2:28 PM 27 ZIP: 55337 Dec 26, 2013 2:23 PM 28 ZIP: 55410 Dec 26, 2013 2:21 PM 29 ZIP: 55337 Dec 26, 2013 2:17 PM 30 ZIP: 55391 Dec 26, 2013 2:15 PM 23 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? ZIP: 55391 ZI P: 55369 ZI P: 54016 ZIP: 54016 ZIP: 55318 ZI P: 55430 ZI P: 55436 ZI P: 55403 ZI P: 55406 ZI P: 55303 31 32 33 34 35 im 37 38 9 Dec 26, 2013 2:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:08 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:07 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:02 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:01 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:58 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:56 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:55 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:48 PM 40 Dec 26, 2013 1:22 PM 24 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? Dec 26, 2013 1:07 PM 47 41 55343 ZIP: 55438 48 Dec 26, 2013 1:20 PM ZIP: 55419 42 ZIP: 55410 ZIP: Dec 26, 2013 1:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:41 PM 43 ZIP: 55424 Dec 26, 2013 1:14 PM 44 ZIP: 55419 Dec 26, 2013 1:12 PM 45 ZIP: 55416 Dec 26, 2013 1:09 PM !l. ZIP: 55410 Dec 26, 2013 1:07 PM 47 ZIP: 55343 Dec 26, 2013 1:05 PM 48 ZIP: 55419 Dec 26, 2013 1:03 PM 49 ZIP: 55442 Dec 26, 2013 12:41 PM 50 ZIP: 55410 Dec 26, 2013 12:40 PM 25 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? ZIP: 55316 ZIP: 55316 ZIP: 56001 ZIP: 55376 ZIP: 55416 ZI P: 55419 ZIP: 55125 ZI P: 55423 ZIP: 55417 ZIP: 55410 51 Dec 26, 2013 12:33 PM 52 Dec 26, 2013 12:31 PM 53 Dec 26, 2013 12:30 PM 54 Dec 26, 2013 12:28 PM 55 Dec 26, 2013 12:24 PM 56 Dec 26, 2013 12:23 PM 57 Dec 26, 2013 12:21 PM 58 »�7 We 26 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 12:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:16 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:13 PM Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? ZIP: 55410 ZIP: 55410 ZIP: 55410 ZIP: 55410 ZIP: 55403 ZIP: 55419 ZIP: 55374 ZIP: 55430 ZI P: 55436 ZIP: 55311 61 Dec 26, 2013 12:11 PM 62 Dec 26, 2013 12:09 PM 63 Dec 26, 2013 12:07 PM 64 Dec 26, 2013 12:01 PM 65 Dec 26, 2013 11:59 AM M. Dec 26, 2013 11:56 AM 67 Dec 26, 2013 11:55 AM M. Dec 26, 2013 11:53 AM .• Dec 26, 2013 11:41 AM 70 Dec 26, 2013 11:38 AM 27 of 52 Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? ZIP: 54981 ZI P: 55424 ZIP ZIP ZIP ZIP ZIP ZIP ZIP 55416 55435 RZM OJ6 55436 55431 55416 55410 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ZI P: 55318 28 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 11:36 AM Dec 23, 2013 2:11 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:08 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:03 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:57 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:55 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:51 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:48 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:43 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:29 PM Page 2, Q10. What is your home zip code? 81 ZIP: 55318 82 ZIP: 55438 29 of 52 Dec 20, 2013 7:01 AM Dec 19, 2013 7:21 AM 30 of 52 Page 3, Q11. How long did it take you to find an available parking space and park your car? 1 5 minutes 2 2 minutes 3 1 minute 4 5 minutes 5 2 minutes 6 1 minute 7 5 -10 minutes 8 5 minutes 9 0 minutes 10 0 minutes 11 5 minutes 12 1 minute 13 Usually find one the first try in a covered spot. Not always though. 14 5 minutes 15 5 minutes 16 20 minutes 17 10 minutes 18 typically 10 minutes 19 1 have never had a problem 31 of 52 Dec 27, 2013 8:58 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:56 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:54 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:52 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:51 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:49 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:46 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:44 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:39 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:37 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:00 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:58 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:38 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:35 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:31 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:28 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:26 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:21 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:18 AM Page 3, Q11. How long did it take you to find an available parking space and park your car? 20 5 minutes 21 2 minutes 22 5 minutes 23 3 minutes 24 5 minutes 25 5 minutes 26 15 minutes 27 30 seconds 28 Too long 29 0 minutes 30 0 minutes 31 2 minutes 32 seconds 33 1 minute 34 10 minutes 35 1 minute 36 1 minute 37 1 or 2 minutes 38 instant 32 of 52 Dec 27, 2013 7:15 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:12 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:09 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:07 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:04 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:02 AM Dec 27, 2013 6:52 AM Dec 26, 2013 2:34 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:30 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:28 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:25 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:21 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:19 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:17 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:09 PM Page 3, Q11. How long did it take you to find an available parking space and park your car? 39 5 minutes 40 1 second 41 5 minutes 42 20 minutes 43 3 minutes 44 5 minutes 45 1 minute 46 20 minutes 47 1 minute 48 < 1 minute 49 < 5 minutes 50 < 1 minute 51 3 minutes 52 1 minute 53 < 1 minute 54 5 minutes 55 N/A 56 N/A 57 5 -10 minutes 33 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 2:07 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:05 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:03 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:59 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:57 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:11 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:07 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:05 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:04 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:42 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:40 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:38 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:34 PM Page 3, Q11. How long did it take you to find an available parking space and park your car? 58 5 minutes 59 5 minutes 60 20 minutes 61 < 1 minute (but not typical) 62 5 minutes 63 10 minutes 64 5+ minutes 65 15 minutes 66 4 minutes 67 15 minutes 68 couple minutes 69 1 minute 70 5 minutes 71 1 minute 72 1 minute 73 1 minute 74 1 Minute 75 0 minutes 76 10 minutes 34 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 12:32 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:31 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:29 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:22 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:17 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:11 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:10 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:08 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:01 PM Dec 26, 2013 11:59 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:57 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:55 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:53 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:41 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:39 AM Page 3, Q11. How long did it take you to find an available parking space and park your car? 77 1 minute 78 0 Minutes 79 2 Minutes 80 5 Minutes. 81 not long (30 seconds) 82 5 Minutes 83 5 Minutes 84 Same day 85 0 Minutes 86 2 Minutes 87 5 Minutes 88 5 minutes 89 20 minutes 35 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 11:37 AM Dec 23, 2013 2:09 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:07 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:04 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:01 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:58 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:56 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:49 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:43 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:30 PM Dec 20, 2013 7:02 AM Dec 19, 2013 7:28 AM 36 of 52 Page 3, Q16. In one word, how would you describe parking at 50th & France? 1 Perfect! Dec 27, 2013 8:58 AM 2 Unpredictable Dec 27, 2013 8:56 AM 3 Decent Dec 27, 2013 8:54 AM 4 Good, free Dec 27, 2013 8:52 AM 5 Inconsistent Dec 27, 2013 8:51 AM 6 1 have a permit so its not too bad. Dec 27, 2013 8:49 AM 7 nit or miss Dec 27, 2013 8:46 AM 8 Sufficient Dec 27, 2013 8:44 AM 9 Great Dec 27, 2013 8:39 AM 10 Available Dec 27, 2013 8:37 AM 11 Challenging Dec 27, 2013 8:00 AM 12 Sufficient Dec 27, 2013 7:58 AM 13 Busy Dec 27, 2013 7:38 AM 14 Easy Dec 27, 2013 7:35 AM 15 OK Dec 27, 2013 7:31 AM 16 Spread out Dec 27, 2013 7:28 AM 17 ....fine Dec 27, 2013 7:26 AM 18 Awful Dec 27, 2013 7:21 AM 19 Perfect Dec 27, 2013 7:18 AM 37 of 52 Page 3, Q16. In one word, how would you describe parking at 50th & France? 20 Frustrating 21 Good 22 Busy 23 Excellent 24 Limited 25 hit -n -miss 26 Great 27 Cold and always rooftop 28 Confusing 29 Messy 30 Fine 31 Convenient 32 Available 33 Chaotic 34 OK 35 Easy 36 Fine 37 Good 38 Fine 38 of 52 Dec 27, 2013 7:15 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:09 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:07 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:04 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:02 AM Dec 27, 2013 6:52 AM Dec 26, 2013 2:34 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:30 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:28 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:25 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:21 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:19 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:17 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:09 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:07 PM Page 3, Q16. In one word, how would you describe parking at 50th & France? 39 Easy 40 Fine 41 Moderate 42 Easy /Free 43 Crowdy /Love free parking 44 Efficient 45 Convenient 46 Challenging 47 Diff. 48 Unique 49 Adequate 50 Challenge 51 Easy 52 Congested 53 Fine 54 OK 55 Good 56 Plentiful 57 Over - stimulating 39 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 2:05 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:03 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:59 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:57 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:11 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:07 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:05 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:04 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:42 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:40 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:38 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:34 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:31 PM Page 3, Q16. In one word, how would you describe parking at 50th & France? 58 Full 59 Inadequate 60 Challenging 61 fine - terrible 62 Great 63 Atrocious 64 Adequate 65 Awful 66 OK 67 Accessible 68 Good 69 Convenient 70 Convenient 71 Okay 72 Complex 73 Adequate 74 fair 75 Convenient 76 Messed up. 40 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 12:29 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:22 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:17 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:11 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:10 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:08 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:01 PM Dec 26, 2013 11:59 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:57 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:55 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:53 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:41 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:39 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:37 AM Dec 23, 2013 2:12 PM Page 3, Q16. In one word, how would you describe parking at 50th & France? 77 O. K. 78 Good 79 Mediocre 80 Great 81 Fair 82 Convenient 83 Convenient 84 Easy 85 Ackward 86 Awkward 87 Convenient 41 of 52 Dec 23, 2013 2:09 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:07 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:04 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:58 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:56 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:49 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:43 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:30 PM Dec 20, 2013 7:02 AM Dec 19, 2013 7:28 AM 42 of 52 Page 3, Q17. If you could change one thing agout 50th & France parking, what would it be? 1 Nothing 2 Nothing 3 N/A 4 Possibly more signage promoting ramps 5 Add a couple of levels to the ram and an elevator. 6 more spaces 7 Nothing 8 Increase time limit 9 Parking ramp circulation 10 Educate users about available parking 11 More ramps, higher ramps 12 Change one way in to Lunds. More parking by Starbucks. 13 More employee spots 14 MORE SNOW PLOWING 15 More parking spaces available 16 expand spots 17 Traffic 18 Lunds lot is very hard to find space. 19 Nothing 43 of 52 Dec 27, 2013 8:58 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:54 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:52 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:51 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:49 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:46 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:44 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:37 AM Dec 27, 2013 8:00 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:58 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:38 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:31 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:28 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:26 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:21 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:15 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:09 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:07 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:04 AM Page 3, Q17. If you could change one thing agout 50th & France parking, what would it be? 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 No ice in winter More roofed parking Make crosswalks better Crosswalks Nothing N/A more parking Bigger ramp More of it None at the moment None Nothing, 1 st time I've been here. Bigger ramp Increased capacity N/A Nothing Bigger ramp On- Street parking More parking.... 44 of 52 Dec 27, 2013 7:02 AM Dec 26, 2013 2:30 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:28 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:21 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:19 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:17 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:15 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:05 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:03 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:59 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:57 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:23 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:15 PM Page 3, Q17. If you could change one thing agout 50th & France parking, what would it be? 39 N/A 40 Permitting Enf. - Permit but ticketed like a customer (part time) 41 Nicollet Mall no cars 42 Events /Holiday Times 43 More parking 44 Elevators 45 More parking 46 No 47 N/A 48 more signs for ramps 49 N/A 50 Full /Empty Sign 51 Increase ramps 52 more spaces 53 intress /express conflict 54 clean and patrol ramps 55 More 56 Nothing 57 strickter enforcement 45 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 1:13 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:11 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:07 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:05 PM Dec 26, 2013 1:04 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:42 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:40 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:38 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:34 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:32 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:31 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:29 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:22 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:17 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:11 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:08 PM Dec 26, 2013 11:59 AM Page 3, Q17. If you could change one thing agout 50th & France parking, what would it be? 58 more parking 59 More 60 More 61 More signs 62 Sinage /info 63 Make Lunds general like before. 64 Longer periods to park. 65 Move anybody parking in Lunds lot. 66 Expand 67 Would like more slots in the Clancy lot. 68 Nothing. Vacancy Sign. 69 More parking (free). 70 Security at night. 71 South Ramp entrance and exits are too congested. 72 none 73 Big truck & small spaces need to be bigger. 74 Need larger parking spaces for bigger trucks 75 bigger ramp 46 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 11:57 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:53 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:41 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:39 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:37 AM Dec 23, 2013 2:12 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:09 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:07 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:04 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:01 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:58 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:56 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:49 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:43 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:30 PM Dec 20, 2013 7:02 AM Dec 19, 2013 7:28 AM 47 of 52 Page 5, Q24. Any additional comments? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Wel Female, 26 -35 Dec 27, 2013 8:58 AM Female, 26 -35 Dec 27, 2013 8:57 AM Male, 56 or older Dec 27, 2013 8:55 AM Male, 3645 Dec 27, 2013 8:53 AM Male, 19 -25 Dec 27, 2013 8:51 AM Male, 26 -35 Dec 27, 2013 8:49 AM Female, 19 -25 Dec 27, 2013 8:47 AM Male, 36-45 Dec 27, 2013 8:45 AM Male, 46 -55 Dec 27, 2013 8:39 AM Male, 36-45 Dec 27, 2013 8:38 AM Female, 56 or older Dec 27, 2013 8:01 AM Female, 46 -55 Dec 27, 2013 7:58 AM 12. Roof, far from stairs. 22. 1 don't make enough for that. Female, 19 -25 Dec 27, 2013 7:39 AM Female, 46 -55 Dec 27, 2013 7:36 AM Female, 56 or older Dec 27, 2013 7:32 AM 19. This would deter business. 22. Want to see cost analysis. Female, 26 -35 Dec 27, 2013 7:29 AM Female, 19 -25 Dec 27, 2013 7:26 AM General: I do not like to park in another because I get off at 10PM. Cannot afford to pay for parking when I make $10 /per Dec 27, 2013 7:24 AM hour. 23. Because I drive from Plymouth and work in Edina. Female, 36-45 Dec 27, 2013 7:19 AM 48 of 52 Page 5, Q24. Any additional comments? 20 Female, 56 or older 21 Female, 26 -35 22 Female, 46 -55 23 Female, 56 or older 24 Female, 56 or older 25 Female, 56 or older 26 Female, 46 -55 27 Female, 28 Male, 19 -25 29 Female, 46 -55 30 Male, 36-45 31 Female, 46 -55 32 Male, 19 -25 33 Female, 56 or older 34 Male, 19 -25 35 Female, 46 -55 36 Male, 46 -55 37 Male, 18 or younger 38 Female, 36 -45 49 of 52 Dec 27, 2013 7:15 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:13 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:10 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:08 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:04 AM Dec 27, 2013 7:03 AM Dec 27, 2013 6:53 AM Dec 26, 2013 2:35 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:31 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:29 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:27 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:25 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:24 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:22 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:16 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:14 PM Dec 26, 2013 2:10 PM Page 5, Q24. Any additional comments? 39 Female, 36-45 Dec 26, 2013 2:08 PM 40 Female, 46 -55 Dec 26, 2013 2:05 PM 41 Female, 36-45 Dec 26, 2013 2:03 PM 42 Female, 56 or older Dec 26, 2013 2:02 PM 43 Male, 36-45 Dec 26, 2013 1:59 PM 44 Female, 56 or older Dec 26, 2013 1:57 PM 45 Female, 46 -55 Dec 26, 2013 1:55 PM 46 Female, 56 or older Dec 26, 2013 1:53 PM 47 Male, 26 -35 Dec 26, 2013 1:45 PM 48 Male, 19 -25 Dec 26, 2013 1:21 PM 49 Male, 46 -55 Dec 26, 2013 1:19 PM 50 Female, 36-45 Dec 26, 2013 1:15 PM 51 Male, 36 -45 Dec 26, 2013 1:13 PM 52 Female, 56 or older Dec 26, 2013 1:11 PM 53 Female, 46 -55 Dec 26, 2013 1:08 PM 54 Female, 19 -25 Dec 26, 2013 1:06 PM 55 Female, 36-45 Dec 26, 2013 1:04 PM 56 Male, 56 or older Dec 26, 2013 12:42 PM 57 Female, 56 or older Dec 26, 2013 12:41 PM 50 of 52 Page 5, Q24. Any additional comments? 58 Male, 56 or older 59 Female, 46 -55 60 Male, 19 -25 61 Male, 3645 62 Male, 56 or older 63 Female, 56 or older 64 Male, 46 -55 65 Female, 56 or older 66 Female, 56 or older 67 Female, 36 -45 68 Female, 56 or older 69 Female, 56 or older 70 Male, 56 or older 71 Male, 56 or older 72 Female, 46 -55 73 Female, 56 or older 74 Female, 56 or older 75 male, 56 or older 76 Female, 56 or older 51 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 12:38 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:34 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:33 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:29 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:26 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:24 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:22 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:20 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:18 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:12 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:10 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:08 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:02 PM Dec 26, 2013 12:00 PM Dec 26, 2013 11:57 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:56 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:54 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:42 AM Dec 26, 2013 11:40 AM Page 5, Q24. Any additional comments? 77 Female, 56 or older 78 Male. 56 or older. 79 Female. 56 or older. 80 Female. 56 or older. 81 Female. 26 -35. 82 Female. 46 -55. 83 Male. 46 -55. 84 56 or older. 85 Female, 56 or older 86 Female, 56 or older. 87 Female, 56 or older. 88 Male/19 -25 yrs. old 52 of 52 Dec 26, 2013 11:37 AM Dec 23, 2013 2:12 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:09 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:07 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:04 PM Dec 23, 2013 2:01 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:59 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:52 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:50 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:44 PM Dec 23, 2013 1:41 PM Dec 19, 2013 7:29 AM APPENDIX D - PARKING OPERATIONS, MANAGEMENT, AND FINANCING City of na 5e & Fence District 1=0 Parking Operations, Management and Financing Prepared by: Ci=Fl: Kimley -Horn = and Associates, Inc. January 2014 Copyright 0 2014, Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. Prepared for: A. n� The ClTY of /O EDINA J\ `- -/ `�`�"'•,".•+`'� ..For lmn4, learnin, raidng f uses & doing bvsinew ParkingOperations and Management .......................................... ............................... 1 Characteristics of Effective Parking Programs ..................... .............................. . 1 Organization.............................................................. ............................... 1 Effective Parking System Organizational Models ................. ............................... 2 Parking101 ............................................................... ............................... 3 Characteristic # 1— Clear Vision and Mission .................... ............................... 5 Characteristic # 2 — Parking Philosophy ........................... ............................... 6 Characteristic# 3 — Strong Planning ................................ ............................... 7 Characteristic # 4 — Community Involvement ..................... ..: .I........................... 8 Characteristic # 5 - Organization ..................................... ............................... 8 Characteristic # 6 — Staff Development ............................. ............................... 10 Characteristic # 7 — Safety, Security and Risk Management ... ............................... 11 Characteristic # 8 - Effective Communications ................... ............................... 12 Characteristic # 9 — Consolidated. Parking Programs ............ ............................... 12 Characteristic # 10 — Strong Financial Planning .................. ............................... 13 Characteristic #.11— Creative, Flexible and Accountable Parking Management......... 14 Characteristic # 12 — Operational Efficiency ....................... ............................... 15 Characteristic # 13 — Comprehensive Facilities Maintenance Programs ................... 16 Characteristic # 14 — Effective Use of Technology ................. ............................... 19 Characteristic # 15 — Parking System Marketing and Promotion ............................ 19 Characteristic # 16 — Positive Customer Service Programs ..... ............................... 20 Characteristic # 17 — Special Events Parking Programs ........ ............................... 21 Characteristic # 18 - Effective Enforcement ....................... ............................... 22 Characteristic # 19 — Parking and Transportation Demand Management ................. 22 Characteristic # 20 — Awareness of Competitive Environment ............................... 23 Summary................................................................... ............................... 23 ParkingFinancing ................................................................... ............................... 24 501h and France Parking Operations and Management Kimley -Horn has worked extensively with business districts around the country. Through our affiliation with.the International Downtown Association, we were asked to create a framework for developing successful approaches for the management of parking for business districts. The result of this work on district parking management best practices was a paper entitled "The 20 Characteristics of Effective Parking Programs ". Characteristics of Effective Parking Programs Based on evaluating numerous parking systems of various sizes and complexity, Kimley -Horn has identified a set of twenty characteristics, that when combined into an integrated programmatic approach can provide the basis for a sound and well managed parking system. The twenty characteristics include: 1. Clear Vision and Mission 2. Parking Philosophy 3. Strong Planning 4. Community Involvement 5. Organization 6. Staff Development 7. Safety, Security and Risk Management 8. Effective Communications 9. Consolidated Parking Programs 10. Strong Financial Planning 11. Creative, Flexible and Accountable Parking Management 12. Operational Efficiency 13. Comprehensive Facilities Maintenance Programs 14. Effective Use of Technology 15. Parking .System Marketing and Promotion 16. Positive Customer Service Programs 17. Special Events Parking Programs 18. Effective Enforcement 19. Parking and Transportation Demand Management 20. Awareness of Competitive Environment A parking system that has all twenty of these characteristics is well on its way to being in a class apart from the majority of parking systems. The ultimate goals are a system that provides professional management, understands the role it plays in contributing to the larger objectives of the downtown or shopping district and is responsive to the community to which it serves. Organization One area that needs to be addressed between the City of Edina and the 50th and France District is the issue of parking program organization. There is a tendency, especially within municipal governments, for parking functions to evolve over time into organizational structures that we have termed "horizontally integrated ". This means that various parking system components are spread among multiple departments or entities. The following example illustrates how many municipal parking programs evolved and also reflects the "fragmentation' that this approach can engender. 1 I Page • There was a need to establish a parking function. The initial need was to manage on- street parking assets. Because Public Works already managed the streets, this function was located under the Public Works department. • When the need for an enforcement function achieved critical mass, this was logically assigned to the Police Department. • Overtime, off-street lots and parking structures were added. The management of these resources was placed under the Facilities Management Division, because they manage the City's real estate assets and facilities. • Soon there was enough revenue being generated that an audit /accounting function teas established to ensure accountability over the revenues and expenses. This function teas placed under the Finance Division. Fast forward to today. Your community is embarking on a district master planning process. You would expect this process to be focused on issues such as urban design standards, place making and economic development, but all people want to talk about is parking! Stakeholder comments include: "All these issues are important, but nothing works without parking." "Parking is impacting everything we are trying to achieve as a community!" "If parking is this important, are we sure that the parking system is organized to be as efficient and effective as possible ?" "How is our parking system organized anyway ?" - Enter the need for a Parking System Organizational Analysis. Effective Parking System Organizational Models There are in fact several very effective parking system organizational models, each with its own strengths and weakness depending on several factors such as your parking system's size, programs offered, political landscape, etc. The four primary successful organizational models are: ■ A Consolidated ( "vertically integrated ") City Department model ■ The Parking Authority model ■ The "Contract" or Downtown Association model ■ The Parking District model There are of course several variations and hybrids of these models, but these are the four primary alternatives. We don't have room here to go into depth on the specifics of these models, but they do all have one common factor that contributes to their success: They all address the major problem associated with the "horizontally integrated model" described above — we call this "The Elephant Problem ". You may remember the old story about a group of blindfolded men being led into a room that contained an elephant. Each man was directed to a different part of the elephant and asked to describe it. One said it seemed most like a tree trunk. Another said it seemed more like a snake. Another said it was more like a fire hose. You get the idea. In a parking program where each department only manages one aspect of the parking system, such on- street parking, or enforcement or parking structures — often times no one has responsibility, or the perspective to manage all these interrelated components as a system. In one study where different departments each had a small amount of parking to manage (for example a couple decks and surface lots) along with responsibilities for several other areas, the observation was made that "parking was 2 1 P a g e everyone's part-time job, but no one's full -time job ". When Kimley -Hom evaluates which organizational option might work best in your community we often use the following technique with various stakeholder groups. First we explain how each model typically works and describe in detail its defining characteristics. We then ask the stakeholders to envision each model as it might develop in their community. Then we have them rank each organizational option by the following criteria - Which organizational option: • Best supports economic development • Is most efficient/cost effective • Is most customer - friendly • Is most politically feasible • Is most focused on the vision • Is easiest to achieve • Is most responsive to businesses and stakeholders • Is most financially viable • Provides the most effective coordination The process is very effective in helping communities evaluate the organizational options and begin the process of revolutionizing and reinventing their parking system An effectively organized parking program can be a significant contributor and partner in helping communities achieve their larger strategic goals and objectives. In the case of 50'h and France, the primary issue is consolidating the responsibility and authority for parking in one area. One entity needs to take ownership of parking issues and be the central point for all coordination; complaints and services. Parking 101- Choose Any Two As a national parking practice builder for Kimley -Horn and Associates, I have had the opportunity evaluate many municipal and business district parking operations in great depth. There is one element common to every study and every downtown - parking is always a source of frustration and contention. It is amazing how emotional an issue parking can be. I believe this is because it affects people so directly. Think about it — how many other areas involve issues of personal safety /security, finance, convenience, wayfinding, accessibility and customer service? Because parking creates the first and last impression of your district, one question we will address is: How can that "parking experience" best be managed? We'll get back to that question shortly. 3 1 P a g e An interesting truism about parking is illustrated in the graphic below. Inexpensive & Convenient But Not Enough Choose Any Two INEXPENSIVE Inexpensive & Enough Parking, But Not Convenient CONVENIENT ENOUGH Convenient & Enough Parking, But Not Inexpensive Everyone wants three things when it comes to parking: 1.) They want there to be plenty of it 2.) They want it to be very convenient and 3.) They want it to be inexpensive (and preferably free). Unfortunately, you can have any two, but not all three. This ushers in the need for a policy decision. o If you choose to have inexpensive and convenient parking you will likely not have enough. This option may be acceptable if you want to use the lack of spaces as part of a demand management strategy to encourage the use of transportation alternatives. o If you choose to have inexpensive and enough parking it will not be very convenient. With this choice you, may be adopting a strategy that utilizes less expensive remote parking supported with shuttle operations (at least for employees). o If you choose to have convenient and enough parking, it will not be cheap. This often preferred approach typically means . you have chosen to.develop structured parking. The average cost to construct a surface lot parking ranges from $2,500 to $3,000 per space. Above grade parking structures average between $15,000 - $20,000 per space. Below grade parking can range between 1.5 to 2 times the cost of above grade structures. Another consideration that is often over looked is that operating, utility, maintenance and security costs are significantly higher with structured parking. In urban environments the choice is most often made to have- "convenient and enough" parking. This strategic decision and the significant capital investment it requires, creates the need to assure that these investments are well managed and responsive to the communities they serve. 4 1 P a g e Characteristic # 1 Clear Vision and Mission Truly effective parking systems have a clear vision and well - defined mission for the parking system. The development or periodic reassessment of the parking system vision/mission statements should be undertaken as an open and inclusive process involving a wide range of downtown stakeholders. Typically, it is recommended that the following groups be included in the public input process: • City Officials (including elected officials, planning staff, transit agencies, etc.) • Downtown Development Agencies • Downtown/District Business Associations • Downtown/District Property Owners • Downtown/District Merchants • Downtown/District Employees • Downtown/District Customers The development of a parking system's vision and mission statements should have one overriding goal; to see that the parking system's purpose and direction are tied to and supportive of the larger district's strategic development plan. There are a variety of ways that parking can support the health, vitality and sustainability of a downtown or business district. Having a professionally managed parking program that presents clean, safe, attractive and well - maintained facilities is perhaps the most visible dimension. Other attributes include providing an adequate supply of parking overall and the appropriate allocation and management of those resources to best support the various businesses that depend on these resources for their success. Successfully meeting these goals promotes downtown business retention and attraction. The parking system administrator should play a key role in providing educational support to community leaders about the importance of parking and the role(s) parking can play (and cannot play) in meeting community objectives. Staying abreast of the latest technological developments related to parking systems can broaden the options available to improve parking system management effectiveness and efficiency.. Common problems for downtowns, such as promoting turnover of short-term on -street spaces without being perceived as "unfriendly or heavy - handed ", or providing more convenient customer payment options are good examples. The use of new technology to support the mission and vision can have a profound impact on the perception of the parking system and how it is contributes to achieving the goals of the downtown it serves. In effective systems, Parking's financial responsibilities are well defined and understood. This is a critical component of the vision/mission, as it directly impacts the perception of whether the parking system is meeting its financial obligations and expectations. Part of this important discussion relates to whether the parking system is expected to be subsidized by the City's General Fund, or other revenue sources such as Tax Increment Financing, contributions from Business Improvement Districts, Special Assessment Districts, etc. or whether parking is expected to cover its own operating and maintenance costs, but not debt service. Or, is parking expected to cover all costs and generate additional revenue. Which of these options is feasible for your community depends on a number of variables. 5 1 P a g e Characteristic # 2 Parking Philosophy A succinct statement or statements reflecting your philosophical approach to parking can provide . valuable tools for communicating to your patrons, stakeholders and staff. Some examples of "parking philosophy" are noted below along with a brief commentary. 1. Parking Isn't About Cars ... It's About People This statement reflects an understanding that parking is not simply the act of temporarily storing cars, but it is in fact more about addressing "people" needs at the transition from the vehicular to the pedestrian experience. Under this philosophy, issues such as facility cleanliness, safety, lighting, wayfmding and customer service move to the forefront. Functional design elements that directly impact user comfort such as stall widths, turn radii, walking distances, etc. also take on special importance. 2. People Don't Come Downtown To Park This concept reinforces the reality that parking, while an important support function and critical infrastructure element, is not the reason people visit your downtown. For the downtown to be successful there must be good restaurants, interesting retail and other special attractions. Even the best run parking system with well - designed facilities will not "attract" people to come downtown, however, poorly run operations or dysfunctional facilities can definitely be excuses for people NOT to come downtown. The fundamental principle behind this philosophy is three -fold: 1.) The role of parking is to support other downtown activities. 2.) Eliminate parking as a "reason not to come downtown" and 3.) Recognize what parking is not, i.e., an attraction. 3. Parking Should Be A Positive Experience For years a parking consulting firm had a slogan: "Parking should be a non - event''. This notion has undergone a qualitative evolution to make parking not just a "non- event ", but actually a "positive experience ". In their book "The Experience Economy ", Joseph Pine and James Gilmore address the concept that, especially in America, what customers are actually purchasing are "positive experiences ". One expression of this transition can be seen in the healthcare arena. Have you noticed that the lobbies of newer health care facilities have taken on the feel of grand hotel lobbies? At the hospital where I used to work, we extended the look and feel of the new bed tower lobby (marble, glass, air conditioning, etc.) into the parking structure elevator lobbies to extend that welcoming experience out into the parking environment. Similarly, the more extensive customer service training provided for hospital reception desk staff was also required for parking attendant and valet parking staff. 4. Parking Is The First And Last Experience Building on the concept above is an appreciation of the fact that most of our customer's first and last impressions of any venue really begins and ends with their parking experience. You might enjoy the best meal followed by a fabulous evening of entertainment, while downtown, but if you have to circle and circle to find a parking space or are accosted walking from your car to your destination, this will taint your whole experience. Follow this up by an encounter with a surly, gum- chewing attendant upon exiting the parking facility and guess what you 6 1 P a g e will be talking about the next day (It probably won't be the delicious meal you had at Gino's.) 5. Parking Should Be Friendly, Not Free. There is no such thing as "free parking ". One of the ongoing challenges that downtown's face when it comes to parking is cost. Because of land values, densities and walking distance issues, parking structures are here to stay in the downtown environment and with them is the need to charge for parking in one form or fashion. The perception that parking at the mall is "free doesn't help (even though it is not true). Even if you promote "free parking" as a marketing concept, someone is paying for that parking. Either through increased taxes or an increased cost of goods or services, the cost of providing parking is still there. This philosophy recognizes this reality and focuses instead on providing a friendly, well managed parking experience. 6. Parking Is A Component Of The Larger Transportation System. It is surprising how often parking gets divorced in people's minds from being a component of the larger transportation system. Structured parking, because of its cost, is often the reason that development projects "don't pencil" to use developer lingo. By considering parking in the larger context of a broad range of transit and transportation alternatives, demand management strategies (including shared parking policies) can be developed that help reduce the amount of parking required, especially in urban areas where good bus transit, light rail, taxi. service and increasingly in -town residential developments can be found. Developing programs that integrate complementary parking and transportation strategies is a hallmark of this philosophy. Characteristic # 3 Strong Planning One consistent characteristic of well - managed and forward thinking parking programs is strong planning. The first step in developing a well - managed parking planning function is to have a solid understanding of existing parking resources. Documenting the basics is fundamental. Below are some basic planning tenants that should be considered: • Parking inventory is complete and up -to -date (includes both public and private parking). • Parking inventories are sub - divided by type and use of space. • Parking utilization, by type of spaces is known and trends tracked. • Changes in supply are documented. • Changes in utilization are tracked and understood. • Periodic Parking Supply- Demand Studies are completed. • Quality parking maps are available and up -to -date. One of the key planning tools that parking departments often overlook or don't understand is land -use data. Successful parking systems develop relationships with city or regional planning agencies so that valuable land -use data, information on proposed developments, downtown planning maps, etc. can be obtained and used in crafting parking planning strategies. When reviewing a strategic parking plan I look for the following items: o Is land use data readily available and up -to -date? 7 1 P a g e • Is historical parking development well documented? • Is planning for the next parking development "on- the - drawing board "? • Is Parking represented and participating in other types of community studies e.g., downtown strategic plans, marketing studies, retail studies, economic development studies, transportation studies, traffic studies, etc.? • Have strategically located potential parking development sites been identified? • Are future parking development sites "land banked "? • Are potential sites assembled to achieve an adequate footprint size to develop efficient parking structures (300 7325 sq. ft. per stall)? • Have parking lot and structure design guidelines been developed? Characteristic # 4 Community Involvement One common problem I often find with struggling parking programs is that they are operated only to satisfy a narrowly defined set of internal objectives (typically focused on revenue generation). Successful parking programs understand that their larger purpose is to support the downtown and the businesses that create and sustain downtown vitality. Parking systems should develop close and cooperative working relationships with other community groups such as economic development agencies and downtown business associations. This does not mean that the parking system exists simply as a tool to be manipulated by these organizations. The parking operation has its own goals and objectives. For example, if the parking system is operating under a mandate to be self - supporting, it may not be able to subsidize a downtown validation program, even though the local downtown business associations might desire this. However, acting as partners, a mutually- beneficial solution can be devised to meet the overall objectives of both organizations whereby costs are shared or alternative funding sources are obtained. Another significant area of potential partnership is downtown and parking system marketing. In the many successful downtowns, Parking co- sponsors or shares in downtown marketing and promotional initiatives. The Downtown Business Association, the Chamber of Commerce and other groups promoting the downtown should include parking information in their publications and parking publications should promote the current programs of the other agencies. This cooperative relationship creates an impression of a well - managed downtown and positively advances the image of the downtown. Successful parking operations actively solicit public input from a variety of sources including: promotion of public .forums, use of parking task force groups, development of a group of "parking advisors" — people who have demonstrated an interest in parking issues (sometimes characterized as "complainers ") and who are recruited to provide input on an occasional basis. The key to success is to listen to the concerns of your customers, act promptly to resolve the issues (or engage and educate them on the "real issues ") and then follow-MR to make sure their issue has been satisfactorily resolved. By doing this, you short- circuit that stream of negativity, which too often circulates among downtown customer groups, and you can begin to build a network of parking system supporters. Characteristic # 5 Organization Whether a City department, a quasi - independent parking authority, an arm of an urban renewal agency or the responsibility of a Downtown Business Association, an important question is whether the parking organization is structured and staffed to best achieve its stated goals? 8 1 P a g e Some basic questions to ask related to the issue of organizational structure include: • Are all parking operations to be managed through a centralized operation or can other departments or agencies get involved in limited parking operations? • Is parking to be managed in- house? • Should certain functions be out - sourced? • Are there advantages to a hybrid approach? • Does the current organization / staffing plan provide the right mix of skills, talents and abilities? • Is staffing as efficient as possible? Are there tools in place to evaluate staffing adequacy? Efficiency? Program effectiveness? When evaluating which organizational option is most appropriate for your particular downtown, consider the following criteria to evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of each model. • Best supports economic development • Is most efficient • Is the most customer - friendly • Is most.politically feasible • Is most focused on the vision • Is easiest to achieve • Is most responsive to business and stakeholders • Is.most financially viable • Provides the most effective coordination Another component of the evaluation process is to identify the program elements for which the parking system will be responsible. The table below provides a list of potential program elements. Possible Scope of Operations verall Leadership and Management ,ogram Definition and Development irking System Revenue Control and Accounting anage Parking Facilities Dntract Management arketi ng /Promotion /Information irking Planning and Coordination arking Facility Development and Construction ommunity Outreach & Education auipment and Technology Specifications auipment and Technology Maintenance arking Enforcement n- Street Parking Management eter Collections and Maintenance ADA Compliance Parking Facility Maintenance Programs Develop Consolidated Financial Reporting System Special Events Parking Management Parking Resource Allocation Rate Setting Residential Parking Permit Programs Special Program Development Service and Information Center (Parking Hotline) Wayfinding and Signage Customer Service Programs Validation Programs Valet Parking Programs Parking and Transportation Demand Management Facility Safety / Security / Risk Management 9 1 P a g e Characteristic# 6 Staff Development Another interesting thing about parking is that, unlike property management, public administration, etc., there are no formal educational programs for parking management. You cannot go out and hire someone from the latest crop of college parking graduates. However, this is beginning to change. The International Parking Institute (IPI) has a highly regarded and reputable educational/certification program called the Certified Public Parking Administrator (CAPP) program that is administered by the University of Virginia. The National Parking Association offers the Certified Parking Facility Manager (CPFM) certification program. For the most part, parking professionals still are learning as they go and bringing with them numerous skills and perspectives imported from a variety of previous work experiences. One characteristic of the most successful parking programs is recognition of the unique knowledge, complexity and broad skill sets required to be successful in parking. These programs invest in the parking specific training and educational opportunities to develop their staff into parking professionals. The following is a list of options to consider to actively promote parking staff development within your parking operation: • Support participation in the International Parking Institute and National Parking Association's certification programs. • Support participation in local, state, regional and national parking associations to create networking and "peer -to -peer communications. These associations also provide the best access to parking specific training opportunities for various staff levels from front -line to administrative. • A recommended best practice is to have an "Operational Peer Review" performed on your operation. An "Operational. Peer Review" involves having a representative from a similar municipal program visit and critique your downtown parking program with a "fresh set of eyes ". Typically this service is reciprocated. This is generally a low cost initiative that can be set up directly or through the national, regional or local parking association and is an effective way to gain and share parking knowledge. • Build a parking resource library — The following is a basic bibliography of good parking texts that can increase your staff's knowledge of the parking industry: i. Parking 101, A Parking Primer — International Parking Institute Fredericksburg, VA, 2002 ii. Parkin - Robert A. Weant and Herbert S. Levinson, Copyright - Eno Foundation for Transportation, Washington, DC, 1990 iii. Parking Structures, Planning Design, Construction, Maintenance and Repair — Anthony Chrest, Mary S. ,Smith, Sam Bhuyan, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Third Edition, Boston, MA, 2001 iv. The Dimensions of Parking - Various Authors, Copyright — The Urban Land Institute and National Parking Association, Fourth Edition, Washington, DC, 2000 V. Parking Generation — Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE Publ. No. IR -034A, 2nd Edition, Washington, DC, 1987 Vi. Shared Parking — Study coordinated by the ULI in association with Barton - Aschman Assoc., Inc, Copyright — The Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC, 1983 (Currently being updated) Vii. Lighting for Parking Facilities — Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Publ. No. RP-20-98,2 nd Edition, New York, NY, 1998 101Page Characteristic # 7 Safety, Security and Risk Management The importance of providing a safe environment in your parking facilities cannot be over estimated. The actual and perceived security within your facilities impacts the success, not only of the parking operation, but also the businesses supported by those facilities. Planning for security in your parking facilities should begin during the design of new facilities. If you are inheriting existing facilities, a security audit-of all facilities is highly recommended. The concept of "Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design" ( CPTED) provides useful tenets for architects, facility planners, designers, and law enforcement/security and parking professionals. Utilizing CPTED concepts helps create a climate of safety in a parking facility, on a campus or throughout a downtown, by designing a physical environment that positively influences human behavior. These concepts can also be used to retrofit environments to address specific security issues as they develop or to address emerging concerns as conditions change. CPTED builds on four key strategies: territoriality, natural surveillance, activity support, and access control. • Territoriality: People protect territory that they feel is their own and have a certain respect for the territory of others. Fences, pavement treatments, art, signs, good maintenance, and landscaping are some physical ways to express ownership. Identifying intruders is much easier in a well - defined space. • Natural Surveillance: Criminals don't want to be seen. Placing physical features, activities, and people in ways that maximize the ability to see what's going on discourages crime. Barriers, such as low ceilings, solid walls, or shadows, make it difficult to observe activity. Landscaping and lighting can be planned to promote natural surveillance from inside a building and from the outside by neighbors or people passing by. Maximizing the natural surveillance capability of such "gatekeepers" as parking lot attendants, maintenance personnel, etc. is also important. • Activity support: Encouraging legitimate activity in public spaces helps discourage crime. • Access; control: Properly located entrances, exits, fencing, landscaping, and lighting can direct both foot and automobile traffic in ways that discourage crime. These principles can be blended in the planning or remodeling of parking facilities and other public areas. In parking environments, the following specific strategies are recommended: • Incorporate the following features into the design of new parking facilities: ■ Higher floor -to -floor heights to improve openness. ■ Glass backed elevators and glass enclosed or open elevator lobbies. ■ Glass enclosed stairwells, perhaps open to the interior. ■ "Blue Light" security phones. ■ Security screening on the ground level. ■ Limit access at the parking facility perimeter to locations where patrons pass by the office or cashier booths. ■ Eliminate potential hiding places (for example under stairs, within storage areas, etc.) ■ Maintain low level landscaping. • Insure that all your facilities are well lighted and meet or exceed the recommended minimums for parking facility lighting as established by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). Develop facility lighting standards. Provide consistent lighting levels in all facilities. I I I P a g e • Integrate security offices, parking offices, retail shops, etc. into parking facilities to provide increased activity levels. • Consider CCTV, alarms, motion detectors and security patrols. • Integrate parking attendants, cleaning and maintenance staff, shuttle drivers, etc. into your parking security program. • Incorporate safety and risk management issues into a weekly facility walk - through checklist. Characteristic # 8 Effective _Communications Best in Class parking operations actively engage other community groups to help define how the parking system can best support the objectives of the businesses and the community at large that depend on a "parking system that works As an outside consultant coming into a downtown to evaluate some aspect of a downtown parking program; it is not uncommon to find ,the parking system at odds with the downtown association. Although there may be as many reasons for this "disconnect" as there are personalities involved, there appears to beat least two primary underlying reasons: o Downtown associations are driven by efforts to revitalize downtown areas and see parking costs as one element that places them at a competitive disadvantage (compared to the perception of "free parking" at the malls /suburbs). At the same time parking system managers are being pushed, usually by municipal governments, to generate revenues. The bottom line is they lack a shared vision and therefore are pulling in opposite directions. o The second major issue typically has to do with service level expectations. Downtown associations tend to have higher expectations in the areas of customer service, facility cleanliness, security, etc. It is not that the parking system administrators do not value these same qualities, but there is a cost associated with providing these programs and limited budgets to support them The irony is that revenues are often reduced by not providing these higher levels of service. The first step towards resolving this problem is improved communications and the definition of a shared vision/mission. A clear understanding of the issues and potential solutions is the kick -off point for developing the needed mutually beneficial approach. Developing a set of "Guiding Principles" for the parking system is good starting point for crafting a successful collaborative relationship. Successful programs also have well- defined relationships between various departments, especially other support departments such as: Maintenance, Enforcement, Security/Police, Communications, Facilities Management, Planning, etc. Finally, successful parking programs are in touch with their customers and actively solicit input through meetings with major downtown employers, customer surveys, websites, parking "hot- lines" and public forums. Characteristic # 9 Consolidated Parking Programs Taking a systems approach to parking is an important dimension to creating a comprehensive and effective parking program. Having control of all or most aspects of parking can contribute to a more effective operation, because of the interactive nature of parking as a system. For example — having control of off - street, but not on- street parking can lead to problems if the rates for the various types of parking are not kept in the proper balance or relationship. Or, not having control over 121Page parking enforcement practices can hamper efforts to promote or improve turnover to support downtown retail or to support special downtown events. Ideally, the parking system should control off - street, on- street and parking enforcement operations. All parking related revenues should first go to fund parking programs, including preventative maintenance, maintenance reserves, parking system/downtown marketing, planning and new parking resource development. If additional revenues, in excess of operational needs are available, they should be banked as reserve funds for future parking development projects or returned to the general fund for discretionary spending. Characteristic # 10 Strong Financial Planning The Parking System's financial expectations should be well- defined and understood. For example, is the parking system expected to be: • A self - supporting entity? • A profit/revenue center? • A support service sustained by other primary revenue sources? With the exception of airports, some university systems and some very large municipalities, parking programs are rarely capable of being totally self - supporting. Many factors including market rates for parking, parking mix (percentage of transient vs. monthly parkers), availability of on- street parking revenues, availability of parking enforcement revenues, politics, economic development policies, etc. have an impact on whether parking can be self - supporting. For systems that cannot achieve true financial self - sufficiency, a. common goal is for the parking system to cover all operational costs, but not debt service costs. Debt service costs are typically subsidized by the general fund, tax increment financing revenues, in -lieu parking fees, or other sources. An important principal in developing a successful parking program is that parking system revenues should be tied to the larger vision and mission of the downtown it is intended to serve. Development of a downtown strategic plan which incorporates not only market and land -use strategies, but also critical support infrastructure such as parking, transit, pedestrian access, freight mobility, loading and unloading, etc. is an excellent means for defining the relationships of all these components and establishing clear goals and direction. Once the vision and mission have been set, investigation of other possible sources of parking revenues may be desired. Alternative parking revenue sources might include: • On- street pay parking (if that does not already exist) • Parking Enforcement • Tax Increment Financing Districts • In- lieu -of Parking fees • Special Parking Assessment Districts • Etc. Other important financial planning elements that are recommended for all parking systems include: • Having a consolidated parking financial statement that tracks all sources of parking revenues and expenses. • Parking's revenues and expenses are well managed and its books are regularly audited. • Annual operating statements are published in an annual report and available for public review. (For an excellent example of this, check out the annual parking report posted on -line by the 131Page Calgary Parking Authority. A simple Internet search for Calgary Parking Authority should get you to the annual report link.) o If a private parking operator is contracted to manage day -to -day operations, an annual parking . operations and financial audit is recommended. Characteristic # 11 Creative, Flexible and Accountable Parking Management This section encompasses so many potential topics it could easily be a whole book in itself. Therefore, we will only attempt to touch on some key issues and principles. One key principle is that different land uses, environments and user- groups require different parking management approaches.. A one - size -fits -all approach does not work. A variety of parking management strategies ,should be employed to address different needs, such as: • Visitor Parking • Employee Parking • On- Street Parking • Reserved Parking • Residential Parking • Special Use Permits • Event Parking • Accessible Parking (ADA) • Shared Parking • Parking Allocation Plans • Loading/Unloading Zone Parking Another key management principal is the need for strong and accountable parking revenue control systems. This begins with the purchase and installation of a parking access and revenue control system specified to meet your system's needs. It is important to understand all the components of the parking access and revenue control system and utilize them to their full potential. Many parking systems purchase expensive systems and use.less than 100/. of the system's capabilities. Using standard parking access and revenue control system reports and creating`;customized reports can provide enhanced management information, improved understanding of operational dynamics and ultimately increased system utilization and efficiency. Another characteristic of effective parking programs is that they have mapped out audit trails and developed processes to provide acceptable levels of control and accountability. Because of the large revenues generated, revenue control and accountability are key parking management issues. Developing policies and procedures for anticipating and managing losses of parking supply (both temporary and long term) is another basic parking management responsibility. Some key elements in this area include: • Planning for and communicating losses of parking supply • Insuring adequate capacity to handle short-term parking supply losses • Having effective plans to manage routine maintenance projects, including customer communications and contingency plans • Having a full understanding of the financial impacts of these projects on revenue streams • Having defined parking replacement cost policies is another recommended best practice. 141P age Development of an "Annual Parking Report" can have a number of positive impacts for a parking system. It identifies key departmental issues and challenges, promotes departmental achievements, documents the "state of parking" to the stakeholders, creates a record of "system history", and builds credibility and confidence in the department. Other parking management elements include: • Well defined parking.policies and procedures • Development and maintenance of parking facility operations manuals • Well defined and implemented facility maintenance programs • Parking system marketing programs • Effective parking and wayfinding signage programs. Characteristic # 12 Operational Efficiency Another area I like to investigate when assessing a parking program is the overall efficiency of the parking operation. Parking system efficiency has several dimensions, depending on how the system is managed. The first area to be scrutinized is the management responsibilities of the system, Le, what programs is the department or organization responsible for implementing. Once this has been defined, organizational structure and staffing plans are analyzed. Development of some form of benchmarking or comparative analysis to measure costs and performance to similar operations is highly recommended. Understanding that benchmarking can be,a tricky business — making sure you are comparing apples to apples, there are some basic benchmarks that.make sense for downtown parking operations. For illustrative purposes, a few basic benchmarks include: o Parking revenue per space o Total operating cost per space • Administrative cost per space • Maintenance cost per space • Citations issued per enforcement staff (FTE) • Parking citation collection ratio Other operational areas can also yield significant savings in terms of reducing costs. Take, for example, facility lighting. Utility costs are integral budget elements in managing a parking structure, but by placing the exterior bay and roof top lights on separate circuits with photo - cells, 25 — 35% of the facility's lights can be turned off during the day, saving significant amounts of electricity. Another area worthy of investigation is staffing costs in the late evening hours when the income generated is less than the staffing costs incurred. In these situations, the use of "Auto- Cashier Units" can be an effective alternative. 151Page Characteristic # 13 Comprehensive Facilities Maintenance Programs Few things make a greater impression on first time visitors than the cleanliness and maintenance of your parking facilities. Beyond first impressions, however, few areas provide a greater potential return on investment than a comprehensive parking system maintenance program. A few best practices related to parking facility appearance and maintenance are noted below. • Paint interior surfaces white to enhance the perception of cleanliness and safety and improve lighting levels. • Develop a comprehensive preventative maintenance program for all essential systems. • Parking Access and Revenue Control System • Elevators • Lighting and Energy Management Systems • Organize and track parking facility warranties in a binder. Schedule warranty inspections six months prior to warranty expiration. Document inspections with digital photos (ideally with time /date stamps) and written reports. • Regularly schedule facility condition appraisals by an experienced parking consultant and develop a prioritized program of facility maintenance repairs. • Set aside adequate maintenance reserve funds based on a prioritized facility maintenance action plan There are four general categories of parking facility maintenance: 1.) Housekeeping — This work is typically conducted by in -house staff and consists of basic cleaning, sweeping, slab wash downs, etc. "Housekeeping" includes items such as: • Sweeping of the stairs, elevator lobbies and floors on a regular basis. • Trash collection on a periodic basis. • Slab wash downs on a semi - annual basis. • Floor drain cleanout (including sediment basket cleanout) • Cleaning of stair enclosures (stair, elevator, and storefront glass) • Cleaning of doors, doorframes and glass on a periodic basis. • Cleaning of signage, light fixture lenses, elevator floors, doors, walls, parking equipment, etc. on a periodic basis. • Cleaning of restrooms, cashiers booths, offices, etc on a regular basis. • Daily walkthrough of the facilities by operator to confirm that housekeeping is being performed. 2.) System Maintenance — This includes tasks necessary to ensure proper operations of systems and components. "System Maintenance" includes items such as: ■ Landscaping — Maintenance — leaves, lawn, trees. — Plantings (annual) — Fencing — posts, chains, etc — Planters — Irrigation Systems 161Page • Painting — spot or seasonal painting. • Parking Equipment Maintenance — Spitters, card readers, computers, booths, gates, etc — Annual maintenance contract with equipment supplier. — It is anticipated that parking equipment will be replaced every 7 to 10 years. • Fire Protection — Maintenance Contract is anticipated — Drain periodically — Testing (twice -per year) . • Lighting — It is anticipated that the lamps should be replaced every 2 to 3 years. — Fixture repair and isolated replacement included in operations — Fixture replacement every 20 years (included in Capital Expenditures) — Lens Replacement every 6 years (with lamps, included in operations) — Lamp replacement on an as need basis — Operator should schedule lamp replacement by level to maximize light effectiveness, and to maintain economy (Note:, Lamp. intensity depreciates significantly, well before burnout) • Elevators - Elevator service contract and maintenance / repairs are generally provided by an outside maintenance firm. — Periodic cleaning of equipment will be reviewed. — Important to provide maintenance to reduce breakdowns. • Electrical / Mechanical / Plumbing Maintenance — Offices / Restrooms / Cashiers Booths • HVAC • Exhaust Fans • Plumbing fixtures • Hot water heaters • Lighting • Electrical Equipment - General and emergency cleaning / maintenance. • HVAC Equipment — General and emergency cleaning / maintenance — Mechanical ventilation — Elevator tower ventilation system • Emergency Power / Lighting Testing and Maintenance Contract. — Generator: Maintenance contract. — UPS System: Maintenance Contract • Plumbing - General cleanout • Domestic Water Maintenance — Drain wash down lines annually — Sump pump inspection • Doors and Hardware — Periodic inspection and lubrication (Malfunction, sticking, etc). • Signage — Illuminated Signs — Replace lamps — Replace damaged signage periodically as required. ■ Snow Removal / Deicing 3.) Annual General Maintenance and Repairs — Annual general maintenance would usually be performed by outside contractors, although in some cases the operator's staff may perform the work. This work is not typically included in a capital cost budget, and may be combined with the System Maintenance category. "General Maintenance" would include items such as: 171Page • Concrete Repairs - Isolated concrete slab, beam, joist, tee, topping, etc repairs. In some cases, periodic concrete repairs (every 5 years) are included; however, isolated repairs between this interval should be anticipated. • Masonry Repair — Isolated masonry repair should be anticipated (spot tuck pointing, damaged masonry unit replacement, resetting cap stone, etc). • Sealants/Expansion Joint — Repair /replacement of isolated sealant (floor and fagade) or expansion joint failure (not included under 5 year warranty). Leaking at slab cracks may also require sealant installation. Leaking joints should be repaired as soon as possible after discovery, and evidence of leaking should be removed. . • Deck Coating - Isolated deck coating repairs (not included under the 5 year warranty). Wear of the topcoat should be repaired prior to damage to the underlying base membrane. • Painting — Painting touchup (spot / seasonal painting) should generally be performed as damage is observed. It is anticipated that repainting of exposed steel and concrete surfaces would be performed every 10 to 15 years, and parking stripes reapplied every 2 to 3 years. • Graffiti Removal — Graffiti removal should be completed as soon as possible after the application. • General Electrical Repairs & Maintenance - Isolated corrosion damage, switchgear maintenance, panel maintenance. • Light Fixture Repair / Replacement — Individual light fixture repair or replacement will require immediate attention. ■ HVAC — Office, Restroom & Elevator HVAC repairs. • Plumbing — Isolated replacement of drain lines and floor drain grates; Isolated cleanout of drains / lines; Periodic sump pump repairs. 4.) Periodic Repairs, Protection, and Improvements (Capital Expenditures) This work is generally performed by outside contractors under the direction of parking consultants experienced in restoration and will consist of replacing/repairing damage to waterproofing or structural elements. Annual Maintenance Costs by Category Housekeeping, Operations & Operator Maintenance, will vary based on specific operations requirements, but will approximate $350 to $450 per space per year. Annual General Maintenance and Repairs costs will approximate $0.10 to $.15 /sf per year ($35 to $50 per space per year), depending on condition and type of structural system. Periodic Repairs, Protection, and Improvements (Capital Expenditures) - The maintenance reserve fund can likely be lower during the first 10 years of life, and increased to accommodate improvement planning budgets. For a new structure, this item may range from $75 to $100 per space per year for the first 10 years. 181Page Characteristic # 14 Effective Use of Technology Best in Class parking operations almost always have a comprehensive, and integrated parking access and revenue control system that offers the following.benefits: • Consistent operations and features for customers • Simplified/consistent training for staff and auditors • Similar equipment and models provides for simplified maintenance and less costly parts stocking • Consolidated system -wide reporting and management information Staying informed of new technologies can help provide the parking department with the best tools available to achieve its goals. New technologies can help you, and your staff, work smarter, not harder. Customer service levels can be enhanced through the use of Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) systems, web -based permit renewal programs, pay -on -foot payment stations, etc. Other benefits of incorporating new technologies are improved overall efficiency and effectiveness, reductions in operating expenses, improved management controls and the ability to implement seamless, customer friendly payment system options such as Internet payment options. Characteristic # 15 Parking System Marketing and Promotion This is one of the most over looked aspects of parking system management. An effective parking system marketing and promotions program is one way to quickly set your parking operation apart from the ordinary. The following is a list of action items that can help launch a new or enhance an existing program. o Develop a consistent Parking System Brand ■ The brand should promote the image you want people to have of the system ■ It should reinforce the positive aspects of the system — "Free and Easy Parking ", "Visit Downtown and Parking Is On Us ", etc. • Use consistent signage to "tie the system together" • Have a parking tie -in to all downtown promotional materials. • Expand and improve parking system website • Develop new employee /tenant parking brochures or info packets • Develop parking "E- Bulletins" • Designate a parking spokesperson • Regular personal contact with customers o Develop parking deck floor identification (Themed graphics, music, etc. could be considered an extension of a local public arts program) o Develop cooperative relationships between public and private parking operations to promote efficient use of resources for large public events. • Develop a parking information database • Use billing system to distribute system info and promotional materials • Utilize "Guerilla Marketing" (creative /low cost concepts) techniques. 191Page Characteristic # 16 Positive Customer Service Programs Downtown businesses depend on a parking system that works and contributes to a positive experience of the downtown. Because parking is the first and last impression customers visiting the downtown will have, providing a high level of customer service is critical. When weighing the importance of customer service, consider these statistics: o An average business never hears from 96% of its unsatisfied customers. o On average, for every complaint received there are 26 customers with problems. o The average unsatisfied customer tells 9 -10 people about their problem o Customers who have had the problems solved tell, on average, 5 people. A strong customer service program can provide the following benefits: o Helps create a more "friendly" atmosphere o Improves the image of the Parking Department and the Downtown o Contributes to increased facility utilization (and therefore revenue) o Contributes to increased acceptance of, and adherence to, parking regulations What are some characteristics of bad customer service? o Indifference o Unfriendliness o Runaround o "Joe Rule- Book" o Not listening o Getting the Brush -off o Just going through the motions o No follow -up What are characteristics of good customer service? • Always be friendly and respectful • Allow customers to fully explain their situation, without interruption (let them vent) • "Actively listen" to what your customers say • Ask questions seeking clarification • Maintain eye contact • If the customer is making a complaint, always apologize for the situation (and mean it!) • Explain what you can do for the customer, not what you can't • Always remember that tone of voice and physical movements convey meaning • Walk through the service process with the customer, explain the options • Help the customer understand the options and achieve a level of buy -in • Make sure they know you are there to help • Always conclude a service opportunity with a thank you • If possible, follow -up with the customer to see if the solution worked and if they are satisfied 20 1 P a g e Other recommended strategies to improve customer service include: o Focus on employee training and good hiring practices ■ Hire friendly, attentive, outgoing knowledgeable attendants o Increase personal contact between the parking system manager, stake holders and customers o Institute performance measurements and utilize for company and employee incentives o Create and implement a parking services program (battery jumps, lock -outs, flat - tires, escorts, audio book check -out, etc.) o Implement a "Parking Hot Line" = (immediate response, centralized, easy to remember [555 - PARK], follow -up) o Improve website and links (use as a customer service tool, pay fines, order info, such as downloadable maps, rate schedules, special event info, etc.) o Measure program effectiveness (customer surveys, etc.) o Implement a secret shopper program to evaluate customer service o Implement customer friendly systems such as AVI o Develop a "New Employee Parking Brochure/Information Packet" to make it easier for larger. organizations to get their employees into the system. Characteristic # 17 Special "Events Parldng Programs Coordinating parking for special events, almost more than any other parking management activity, requires a coordinated and cooperative effort with the larger community. Some of the keys to success in this area include the. development of a well - defined special events policy and detailed system for coordination of special events. Another important dimension is the development of strong relationships with the key stakeholder groups that are active in the downtown. Providing practical incentives for other groups to communicate with and include the Parking Department in their planning processes early on is critical. Examples of the incentives parking can provide includes special services such as: coordination services, parking validations, waiving of parking enforcement, etc. for those who participate in the special event planning process. Finally, be consistent in providing those that work with the parking system a high level of service. Conversely, provide disincentives for those that ignore the special events parking policy or chose to not include parking in their planning. 211Page Characteristic # 18 Effective Enforcement Having an effective parking management program requires that the rules and regulations be enforced. The key to an effective parking enforcement program is attitude, consistency and fairness.. Best in Class operations have adopted the philosophy of being customer focused not revenue or violator focused. The following are enforcement program elements that help assure that your program avoids some common pitfalls. o Define who is responsible for day -to -day parking enforcement. "Have a central number that everyone knows to call for info regarding parking enforcement (eliminate the run around). o Assure that parking rules, regulations and consequences are clearly posted. o Assure that if towing or booting is a possibility, that the number to call for towed/booted vehicles is clearly posted. o Define how enforcement revenues are to be collected and used. o Define who sets enforcement policies. o Have a clearly stated process for adjudicating parking citations. o Define who has the authority for towing, booting or other enforcement practices. o Make paying for parking citations as easy as possible. o Provide incentives for early citation payment and disincentives for late or non - payment. Characteristic # 19 Parldng and Transportation Demand Management Because the cost of providing parking can be so high, strategies to manage parking demand is an important consideration in parking system planning. Incorporating parking and transportation demand management also ties into environmental goals and objectives such as the desire to reduce pollution, decrease traffic congestion, reduce reliance on single occupant vehicles, etc. When evaluating options to reduce parking demand, integrate transportation demand management strategies into your parking program philosophy. A few best practices include: o Use parking rates as a tool to promote desired behaviors o Take advantage of employer -paid and employee -paid pre -tax benefit options o Promote carpool/vanpool programs o Provide preferred parking for carpools /vanpools o Subsidize transit passes for downtown employees o Provide a "Guaranteed Ride Home" program for those who participate in transportation alternative programs. o Integrate bicycle racks and storage lockers in parking facilities. o Show transit stops on parking maps o Provide remote parking options and promote park and ride options on the parking web site 221Page Characteristic # 20 Awareness of Competitive Environment Another characteristic of effective parking programs is that they are keenly aware of their competitive environment. They actively monitor private sector parking operators for changes in rates, new services offered, new, technologies being used, etc. One of the most fundamental practices that all parking programs should engage in is .a formalized process for evaluating parking market rates. It is recommended that parking market rate surveys be conducted bi- annually to help maintain an awareness of the competitive: climate. This information can-also-be valuable during annual budget planning. Another dimension to staying competitive is being aware of what parking systems in other municipalities are doing. What has been tried? What has worked? What hasn't? Participating in national, regional and state parking associations, sending key staff to parking conferences and implementing the peer- review process discussed under the Staff Development section earlier are good ways of developing a network of contacts to help you stay up -to -date on the latest technologies and management practices. In Summary... The importance of Parking as one of the most visible and often controversial elements of a downtown's infrastructure is often underestimated. Parking, when well - managed, can be a key component in attracting-and supporting new development and is essential to sustaining healthy and vibrant downtowns. 231Pagc 50`h and France Parking Financing One of the more concerning areas of our review of parking issues at 5& and France is the sustainability of the funding model for future parking capacity expansion in the District. It is our understanding that parking ramp additions or expansions.have historically been paid for by tax increment financing (TIF). Property assessments have primarily been used for annual operations and maintenance costs. The city no longer has authority for TIF, so capital project funding is problematic going forward. If the city were to assess 100% of public improvement costs identified in this study, it is likely that this would be too expensive to be feasible to the property owners. Many parking programs generate significant revenues by implementing a range of paid parking strategies. Implementing paid parking for customers is an idea that has been met with little enthusiasm in the 50 and France District. While keeping parking "free" is seen as, goal, it is important to acknowledge the reality that parking is never truly "free ". The capital, operating and maintenance costs are being borne by someone. In addition, the subsidization of parking (for example free parking for employees) masks the true cost of providing parking and encourages the use of single occupant vehicles and increases parking demand. Pricing is one of the most effective management tools available to parking/facility managers. If paid parking for customers is a non - starter, there are other pricing strategies that might be considered. Examples include paid parking for employees, offering paid valet parking for customers or implementing on- street meters. Let's briefly explore each of these strategies: • Paid Parking for Employees • Let's use a rough estimate of 1,000 for the number of employees working within the 501h and France District • If a very modest parking fee of $15 /month were established for all employees, the potential revenue generated would be: ■ 1,000 x 15 = $15,000 /month ■ $15,000 x 12 months = $180,000 /year • Over time, this could build up to a sizable reserve to fund facility repairs or even debt service .coverage for a small garage expansion. • It would also provide some disincentive to single occupant vehicle usage. • A waiving of this fee could also be used to incentivize the use of transportation alternatives , • Valet Parking for Customers o I understand from discussions with 50'h and France staff that there is a bit of an anti -valet parking mind set in Minnesota. However, given the high -end brand of the 50`h and France District, it seems that offering a combination of free customer parking and an option for valet parking (especially during the holidays) might be worth considering. o The valet parking option could be paid or free. • The free option could give customers an inducement to shop at 50`x' and France as opposed to other options. Think of it as a competitive advantage strategy, especially if parking is getting tight and threatening to become'a competitive disadvantage. • Valet parking can be a labor and liability intensive endeavor. Charging a modest fee for this service could help off -set these expenses. It is not likely to a strong revenue stream generally speaking. • On- Street Paid Parking 241Page • Generally speaking, on- street parking should, be managed as a short-term parking resource. The primary goal related to on- street parking is to promote effective turnover. Pricing and time limits combined with enforcement are the primary tools to accomplish this. When there is, paid parking in both on- street and off - street environments, the on- street parking should ideally be more expensive than the off - street alternatives. • If the City of Edina (possibly working collaboratively with the City of Minneapolis as they already have an effective meter program in place) were to implement paid on- street parking and on- street enforcement, this could generate a significant revenue stream going forward. o Kimley -Horn has a simple model to estimate potential on- street parking revenues. The key input variables include: ■ # of spaces ■ Hours of enforcement per day ■ # of days per week ■ Hourly rate in $/hr ■ Estimated utilization factor o Below is an example of the potential revenue that could be generated based on 100 meters: 50th and France Pmli mrary On -Reef Meter Revenue Pro*dm model Optim 1 fteominmded) $1.00 per Hour Rafe Ester number of meted spares: 100 C ®I1'BWA..A ,he Ender # of Euslday ...................: 0 Assumes meters enforced gam to 6 pm. Change to fit enforcement hours/day. Ender# ofdays per week..........: © Assumes Nbnday through Friday. Saturday is usually a separate calculation since utilization Is r # of weeks per year ..niters paid : ®50= Atiows up to 12 holidays that meters are not enforced per year. Ender the haay rate in b per W..: fie amount charged per hour to dollars or decimal portion thereof. . Utilization factor .....................: 1111110 7.5� A decimal portion between 0 and 1 that indicates the usage of the aggregate meter spaces. High levels of usage will be 0.85 to 1 D. low levels would be 0.10 to 0.35. [Py jMRTAnnuaIIMetepRevenue: 5 =202;500 o The number above is for meter revenue only and does not factor in enforcement revenues which could be higher than the meter revenue. Of course, in this case, a revenue sharing agreement with the City of Minneapolis, initial capital equipment costs and operations expenses would have to be factored in before a true revenue projection could be determined. The real point of this discussion is that it begins to show that by layering several modest paid parking strategies together, significant revenue streams could be generated to supplement the current district assessment model or be used to being building a more sustainable financial framework going forward. 251Page APPENDIX E PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ASSESSMENT AREA MAP 41 X91 ^rte 50th 4 O r 0 FRANCE � ay CITY OF EDINA E o i N a 50th & FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS APPENDIX E - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL EMPI Kimley -Horn 1/21/2014 and Associates, Inc. Map ID PID Owner Name 1 - Owner Name 2 ..Pro a Address Owner Mailin Address Gross Building Area - Sq Ft Assessable Area - Sq Ft Percent Assessable Annual Operations and Maintenance Cost Assessment 2014 Capital Construction Cost Assessment Percent Address . City state ZIP Address city State ZIP 1 1802824140016 William C Knapp William C Knapp Attn: Acctng 4916 France Ave S Edina MN 55410 5000 Westown Parkway Suite 400 West Des Moines IA 50266 11105 4,809.00 43.30% $ 4,794.91 $ 45,346.11 1.37% 2 1602824140024 49.5 LLC 49.5 LLC C/O John D Gross 3918 49 1/2 St W Edina MN 55424 4520 Arden Avenue Edina MN 55424 5307 3,707.00 69.85% $ 3,696.14 $ 34,954.88 1.06% 3 1802824140035 Soon Yong Park/Jung Ja Park Soon Yong Park/Jung Ja Park 3944 49 1/2 St W Edina MN 55424 5275 Grandview Square Suite 3308 Edina MN 55436 5061 1,855.40 "36.66% $ 1,849.96 $ 17,495.36 0.53% 4 1802824140108 LB 49th 1/2 Street LLC Edina Properties Inc. Attn: Jennfier Kent 3948 49 1/2 St W Edina MN 55424 4100 50th Street W Suite 2100 Edina MN 55424 12084 2,450.40 20.28% $ 2,443.22 $ 23,105.86 0.70% 5 1802824140129 Frank Holdings LLC Frank Holdings LLC 4936 France Ave S Edina MN 55424 5223 Edina Industrial Boulevard Edina MN 55439 18557 18,557.00 100.00% $ 18,502.61 $ 174,981.85 5.29% 6 1802824140118 OMG Properties LLC OMG Properties LLC 4930 France Ave S Edina MN, 55410 4930 France Avenue S Edina MN 55410 4199 3,274.20 77.98% $ i 3,264.60 $ 30,873.83 0.93% 7 1802824140020 France Avenue Partnership France Avenue Partnership C/O K.C.S. Property Management Co. 4948 France Ave S Edina MN 55410 8100 12th Avenue S Suite 200 Bloomington MN 55425 8280 4,968.00 60.00% $ 4,953.44' "$ 46,845.39 1.42°/ 8 1802824140021 France Avenue Partnership France Avenue Partnership C/O K.C.S. Property Management Co. 3902 50th St W .Edina MN 55424 8100 12th Avenue S Suite 200 - Blodmington MN. 55425 13614 13,614.00 100.00% $ 13,574.10 $ 128,37220 3.88% 9 1802824140022 Edina Properties Inc, Edina Properties Inc. 3906 50th St W Edina MN 55424 4100 50th Street W Suite 2100 Edina MN 55424 31680 28,480.00 89.90% $ 28,396.53 $ 268,550.04 8.11% 10 1802824140122 Property Administration Co Property' Administration Cc 3922 50th St W Edina MN 55424 3922 50th Street W Edina MN 55424 12862 12,862.00 100.00% $ 12,824.30 $ - 121,281.27 3.66% 11 1802824140121 JSG Company LLP JSG Company LLP 3924 50t1i St W Edina MN 55424 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 108 Minnetonka MN 55343 12960 12,960.00 -. 100.00% $ 12,922.02 $ 122,205.36 ` 3.69% - 12.1802824140126 L A Real Estate Group, Et AI L A Real Estate Group 3930 50th St W Edina MN 55424 4100 50th Street W Suite 2100 Edina MN 55424 80330 ':59,526.80 74.10% - $ . 59,352.34 $ . 561,303.54 16.96% 13 1802824140046 First Building Corporation .First Building Corporation C/O US Bank N.A. 4100 50th St W Edina MN 55424 2800 E Lake Street Minneapolis MN 55406 44776 19,176.00 42.83% $ 19,119.60 $ 180,818.67 5.46% 14 1802824410178 Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 3945 50th St W Edina MN 55424 4100 50th Street W Suite 2100 Edina MN 55424 28026 " 14,226.00 50.76% $ " 14,184.31 $ 134,143.01 4.05% 15 1802824410182 A K Larson Family LLC A K Larson Family LLC 3939 50th St W Edina MN 55424 3939 50th Street W Suite 200 Edina MN 55424 39242 29,997.20 76.44% $ 29,909.28 $ - 282,856.37 8.55% 16 1802824410049 Edina Properties Inc. Edina Properties Inc. 3917 50th St W Edina MN 55424 4100 50th Street W Suite 2100 Edina . MN 55424 42822 31,400.00 73.33% $ 31,307.97 $ 296,083.97 8.95% 17 1802824410052 JSG Company LLP JSG Company LLP " 3911 50th St W Edina MN 55424 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 108 Minnetonka MN 55343 27290 27,290.00 100.00% $ 27,210.02 $ 257,329.03 . 7.77% 18 1802824410383 5000 France Company 5000 France Company 3907 50th St W Edina MN 55424 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 108 Minnetonka MN 55343 24130 24,130.00 100.00% $ 24,059.28 $ - 227,532.04 6.87% 19 1802824410055 France at 50th LLC France at 50th LLC 5034 France Ave S Edina MN 55410 7800 Metro Parkway Suite 300 Bloomington - MN 55425 16368 13,168.00 80.45% $ 13,129.41 $ 124,166.68 3.75% 20 1802824410066 5036 France Property LLC 5036 France . Property LLC 5036 France Ave S Edina MN 55410 5036 France Avenue S Edina MN 55410 6835 6,835.00 100.00% $ 6,814.97 $ 64,450.12 1.95% 21 1802824410237 Americana Bank of Edina Excel Bank of Edina 5050 France Ave S Edina MN 55410 P.O. Box 1509 Minneapolis MN 55480 19102 12,599.60 - 65.96% $ 12,562.67 $ - 118,806.99 3.59% 22 1802824410181 City of Edina City of Edina 3943 50th St W Edina MN 55424 4801 50th Street W Edina MN, 55424 8572 5,143.20 60.00% $ 5,128.13 $ 48,497.42 1.47% Totals 473,202 351,028.80 $ 350,000.00 $ 3,310,000.00 100.00% IL �. W 49TH ST P IF, 171 arcel purchased by City of Edina in 2013 Currently owned by by Edina HRA. fAM L f . W 1r ;+ -aa Z I 4 ' r ,• AI tr f 1 I,w •,s I � P awl,: � b � �, 7 � W ri I ' I W 1iY5 • U1 liw� Z$ ' [ a. , ! �.. . Flu. q a - '1i?y . •""''Lbe" �F rnr", II� all -17 xi v I ` Fc , y � •. I .. cam-. : 4 � :,.�1 R ; - - . ir } 16 a W 52ND ST 1 •Lii _ A''i'• iEEE SC•�a r. �i I~ i .iSh. J �'� �t�' City of Edina 50th & France N _____ k o9e `�� -City Limits S E W ������Q 50th & France Assessments Engineering Dept 0 • -,yjf • November, 2012 O Ce: teal To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. J. From: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Action N Brian Olson, Director of Public Works Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorizing Engineering Services for Design of 50th & France Parking Ramps Improvements Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to sign attached proposal for Engineering Services. Information / Background: Kimley -Horn Associates has completed their Feasibility Study for potential repairs and improvements to the City-owned parking ramps at the 50th and France business district. The content and recommendations of the Study are based on national best - practices and have been crafted using direct input from a Project Advisory Team consisting of property owners and business operators as well as City staff members responsible for planning, transportation, and public works. The Feasibility Study has been submitted to the City and a Public Hearing will be scheduled for February 18, 2014. The construction is anticipated to occur from June to October 2014 with completion in springisummer 2015. It is important that the preparation of the design documents begins soon so that bid documents can be prepared in advance of the summer construction season. Kimley -Horn Associates has satisfactorily completed their previous work with the City and are recommended to continue with the design documents to bring efficiencies to the project. The cost of this work is intended to be included in the overall cost of the project, most of which will be borne by the property owners through the MN Chapter 429 Special Assessment process. Construction costs of capital improvements to the parking ramps are anticipated to be borne by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Final determination of costs will be acted upon when the project is bid in April /May 2014. The Public Works department will be responsible for oversight of this contract and of the project construction. Attachments: • Kimley -Horn Associates proposal dated January 15, 2014 City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 �I Kimley -Horn and Associates. Inc. January 15, 2014 Mr. Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager City of Edina: 4801 West 50`" Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: City of Edina 501" & France Parldng Ramp:Restoration, Streetscape and Wayfinding Final Design Services 50`h & France District - Supplemental Agreement to Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services Dear Mr. Neuendor£ Kimley -Horn is pleased to submit this letter describing our project understanding, scope of services, schedule, and fees for parking structure restoration, streetscape and - wayfinding improvements in the 50'" & France District. The work will be performed in accordance with Kimley -Horn's Master Services Agreement with the City. Project Understanding The City of Edina is moving.forward with a parking, streetscape and wayfmding project in the, 50'h & France District with the.following objectives: e Improve parking ramp accessibility, safety and appearance ® Provide a dynamic parking wayfinding system that informs motorists of structures with available parking ® Structural and preventative maintenance repairs to South, Middle and North ramps. a Improve the lighting levels "in the South, Middle and North ramps O Streetscape improvements. to replace deteriorating/dying.- elements and enhancements We understand that the improvements will be funded by a combination of the City of Edina and special assessments of the benefitting properties. We understand that this project will consist of three distinct bid packages as follows: • Wayfinding System • Parking Ramp Restoration, Pedestrian Access Improvements, and Lighting Improvements • Streetscape Improvements This scope of work builds on Kimley- Horn's SD" & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Study and Report dated January 21, 2014. Mr. Bill Neuendorf January 15, 2014 Page 2 Scope of Services Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. proposes to provide final design services under this authorization, as follows: Task 1— Stakeholder Engagement Services consist of the following tasks: A. Monthlv Invoices 1. Prepare;and submit one invoice per month to the City. B. Public Open House to Present the Project 1. Schedule and lead ' one open house format public meeting to inform the public of the .project elements and phasing for 2014 and 2015 construction. Meeting will have three stations, staffed by one Kimley -Horn team member each, consisting of- i. Wayfinding improvements ii. Parking ramp restoration, pedestrian access improvements, and lighting improvements iii. Streetscape and urban design improvements 2. Comment cards will be made available to obtain public comments and concerns regarding the improvements. C. Project Management Team Meetings 1. Project Management Team will provide technical input, review deliverables and provide direction to the Kimley -Horn team. It is anticipated the PMT .will be composed of city staff representing economic development, public works, engineering, facilities, planning, parking and transportation disciplines. 2. Up to three project management team (PMT) meetings are included in the scope of work. Assumes attendance by up to three Kimley -Horn team members. D. Project Advisory Team Meetings 1. Project Advisory Team will provide a link between the property owner / business owner community and the project. It. is assumed the PAT will be composed of the business owners and property owners that were part of the feasibility study. 2. Up to three project advisory team (PAT) meetings are included in the scope of work. Assumes attendance by up to two Kimley -Horn team members. E. Small Group Meetings I . Invite property owners and tenants to small group meetings to discuss project scope, schedule, and mitigation of construction impacts on businesses. 2. Up to 10 small group meetings are included in the scope of work. Assumes attendance by up to two Kimley -Horn team members. F. Public Art Coordination Meetings 1. Invite Public Art representatives to discuss project scope, schedule, and opportunities to incorporate art into the parking ramps. 2. Up to three small group meetings are included in the scope of work. Assumes attendance by up to two Kimley -Horn team members. Owner to Provider Meeting space and input on the design issues. Deliverables: Meeting minutes and supporting graphics Mr. Bill A'euendorf .lanuaty 15,101 # Page 3 Task 2 - Wayfinding System Services consist of the following tasks: A. Wayfinding Sig_nage & Signage Control System 1. Provide construction documents for wayfinding signage as outlined in paragraph 2.F of the 50`h & France District Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Report. in general this will consist of a wayfinding system that counts vehicles entering and leaving each of the parking ramps and relays the information to four signs within the 5& & France District. The dynamic signs will inform users if a ramp is full or not and direct them to a ramp that has parking availability. The scope of work consist of the following: a. The sign faces and placement will satisfy the requirements of the MnMUTCD which is a requirement of vehicular signing on public roadways. b. Confirm location and feasibility of both dynamic and static wayfinding signs. c. Establish a system of parking ramp identification, which may incorporate public art coordination. d. Develop up to three sign concept designs for the district public parking wayfinding signage. e. After the preferred concept is selected develop a preferred concept design. f. A wireless communications system will be used between the signs, vehicle count system, and control software. g. A functional specification will be developed for the vehicular count, communications, variable message sign components, and the system management software. B. Construction Phasing 1. Provide phasing drawings or specification language as required to meet needs of the City and property owners as outlined in paragraph 3 of the 501h & France District Parking and Wayfinding Improvements, Feasibility Report. Owner to Provide: Input on parking ramp names for use on signage Review comments Procurement, Contracting, and General Requirements Specifications (CSI Division 00 and 01) Deliverables: 30%, 60% and 90% Review Documents Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Construction Plans and Technical Specifications (Division S and CSI Divisions 02 through 48, as applicable) Task 3 - Parking Ramp Restoration, Pedestrian Access Improvements, and Lighting Improvements Services consist.of the following tasks: A. Parking Ramp Restoration 1. Provide construction documents for parking structure restoration as outlined in paragraph 2.I of the 500' & France District. Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Report. in general the repairs will consist of concrete repairs in the parking ramps and stairwells (except the northeast Mr. Bill Meuendorf January 15, 2014 Page 4 stairwell of the South Ramp), expansion and caulk joint replacement, plumbing repairs, traffic membrane recoating and deck sealer application. B. Pedestrian Access Improvements 1. Provide construction documents for pedestrian access improvements as outlined in paragraph 21.1 of the 5& & France District Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Report. In general the repairs will consist of curbs, bollards, signage and pavement markings to define pedestrian paths within the parking ramps. C. Lighting improvements 1. Provide construction documents for lighting improvements as outlined in paragraph 2.1) of the 50fl' & France District Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Report. In general the improvement will consist of. replacing the existing'lights in the ramps with LED light fixtures. D. Construction Phasing 1. Provide phasing drawings or specification language as required to meet needs of the City and property owners as outlined in paragraph 3 of the 50'h & France District Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Report. Owner to Provide: Review comments Procurement, Contracting, arul General Requirements Specifications (CS[ Division 00 and 01) Deliverables: 30 %, 60 %, and 90% Review Documents Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Construction Plans and Technical Specifications (Division S and CS1 Divisions 02 through 48, as applicable) Task 4 - Streetscape Improvements Services consist of the following tasks: A. Streetscape Improvements 1. Provide construction documents for streetscape- improvements as outlined in paragraph 2.1-1 of the 50"' & France District Parking and Wayfinding Improvements Feasibility Report. in general the improvements will consist of paver replacement; street tree replacements; replacement of tree, shrubs and other plantings in poor condition within planting beds; paver sidewalk . installation along the north side of the middle ramp; and an automatic irrigation system. Design development will include an on- site review with city staff to determine limits of paver replacement. One landscape concept will be prepared for review and input. Possible revisions will be included within the final plans. B. Construction Phasing 1. Provide phasing drawings or specification language as required to meet needs of the City and property owners as outlined in paragraph 3 of the 5& & France District Parking and Wayfinding. Improvements Feasibility Report. Owner to Provide: Review comments Procurement, Contracting, and General Requirements Specifications (CSI Division 00 and 01) Deliverables: 30 %, 60 %, and 90% Review Documents Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Construction Plans and Technical Specifications (Division S) Afr. Bill Neue.ndorf January 15, 2014 Page 5 'ask 5 — Bidding Phase Services Services consist of the following tasks: A. Contract Document Distribution 1. Print and distribute plans and specifications! to potential bidders and City staff 2. Assumes up to thirty sets of plans and specifications per bid package, for a total of ninety sets. B. Pre -bid meetings ' 1. Conduct one pre -bid meeting per bid package, for a total of three meetings. 2. Assumes attendance by up to two Kimley -Horn team members. C. Addenda and Respond to Contractor Questions 1. Issue addenda to clarify the bidding documents and respond to contractor questions., 2. Assumes one.addendum per bid package, for a total:of three addenda. 3. Assumes up to ten contractor questions per bid package, for a total of thirty question responses. D. Bid Opening 1. Attend the bid opening, tabulate bids, review bids and prepare a bid award recommendation 2. Assumes one bid opening for all bid packages. 3. Assumes attendance by one Kimley -Horn team member. Additional Services Any services not specifically provided for in the above scope, as well as any changes in the scope the City requests, will be considered additional services and will be performed at our current hourly rates. Additional services we can provide include, but are not limited to, the following: • Project meetings beyond those identified in the. scope of services above • Design of new elevator /stair core(s) in the parking ramps • Design of streets, parking lots, or utility modifications • Construction phase services Schedule The following is a summary of the anticipated schedule for tasks within this proposal: Notice to Proceed Public Hearing, City Council Orders Project, Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Ad for. Bids 30% Design Review with PMT /PAT 60% Design Review with PMT/PAT Open House 90% Design Review with PMT/PAT Advertisement for Bids Bid Opening Assessment Hearing / Award Contract January 21, 2014 February .18, 2014 February 20, 2014 March 20, 2014 April 1, 2014 April 24, 2014 May 1, 2014 May 22, 2014 June 3, 2014 Mr. Brll Neuendorf January 15, 2014 Page 6 Fee and Billing Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. will provide the services described in the scope of services on a labor fee plus expense basis not to exceed two hundred eighty three thousand dollars ($283,000.00). Labor fee will be-billed according to the attached hourly rate schedule. An amount will be added to each invoice to cover certain other expenses such as in -house duplicating, local mileage, postage, and delivery charges. The total estimated fees and expenses for the work tasks included in this Agreement:are: 1. Stakeholder Engagement $ 29,000 2. Wayfuding System $ 54,000 3. Parking Ramp Restoration, Pedestrian Access, Improvements, & Lighting Improvements $ 112,000 4. Streetscape Improvements $ 57,000 5. Bid Phase Services $ 15,000 Reimbursable Expenses $ 16,000 TOTAL $ 283,000 Fees will be invoiced monthly based on the actual amount of service performed and expenses incurred. Payment will be due within 35 days of the date of the invoice. In addition to the matters set forth herein, our Agreement shall include and be subject to, and only to, the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement for, Professional Engineering Service between the City and Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. dated August 16, 2013, except that sections 2.1, 2.5 and 16 are deleted. if you concur in all the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, please have authorized persons execute both copies of this Agreement in the spaces provided below, retain one copy, and return the other to us. Fees and times stated in this Agreement are valid for sixty (60) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate this opportunity to continue our services to the City of Edina. Please contact me at 651 -643 -0411 if you have any questions. Sincerely, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. rry D. Pertz , P.E. Daniel J. C yl P Project Manager /Associate Associate Attachement : Hourly Rate Schedule Copy: File Mr. Bil Ideuendorf January 15, 2014 Page 7 Agreed to this day of , 2014. CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor BY: Scott Neal, City Manager City of Edina Parking and Wayfinding Final Design Services 501h & France District Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Schedule of Rates Effective January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Classification Hourly Rate Administrative Assistant $ 82.50 CADD Technician $ 90:00 Clerical., $ 70:00 Client Manager $190.00 Drafter $ 64.00 Field Technician I $102.50 Field Technician 11 $110.00 Graduate Eng. /Planner I $102.50 Graduate Eng./Planner II $112.50 Principal $195.00 Project Engineer /Planner . $120.00 Project Manager $145.00 Senior Administrative, Assistant $100.00 Senior CADD Technician $100.00 Senior Designer $120.00 Senior Field Technician $125.00 Senior Project Manager $165.00 Reimbursable expenses (copy /printing charges, plotting, mileage, delivery charges, faxes, etc.) will be charged as an office expense at 6.0% of the labor fee. Additional rates may be negotiated at a later date for classifications or services not included above. F� i To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: January 21, 2014 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. K. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ® Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Contract #13 -7PK, Site Planning, Landscape Architecture and Civil Engineering, Pamela Park Renovation Project, Anderson Johnson Associates Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 NA Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc. $147,890 or 5.75% of the total construction costs Recommended Quote or Bid: Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc. General Information: On October 14, 2013 the City Council directed staff to proceed with the development of plans and specifications for the renovation of Pamela Park. Staff has worked with Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc. since 2009 to develop a master plan and related cost estimates for this project. An AIA Document B101- 2007 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect will be used and has been reviewed and approved by City Attorney Roger Knutson. The fee of $147,890 represents 5.75% of the anticipated construction cost of $2,572,000. There will be additional fees billed directly to the city for testing, permits, survey, and soil borings. This fee does not include construction costs for the shelter building. Anderson Johnson will provide site planning, landscape architecture and civil engineering for the south athletic field renovation, southeast (senior lighted) athletic field, north (senior) athletic field, north parking lot, west parking lot, south parking lot, and paved trails. Another architect will be hired to provide design services for the park shelter building. Recently, in addition to the Pamela Park project, we have worked with Anderson Johnson on the Golf Dome and Sports Dome projects and the Garden Park baseball field renovation. Staff began working with Mark Ruff, Senior Financial Advisor /Principal from Ehlers regarding the financing for this.project. This contract would be paid as part of the funding package for the Sports Dome, outdoor rink, Arena improvements and Pamela Park renovation projects. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Attachments: Pamela Park Fee Proposal City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. : Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 I Exhibit A - Fee Proposal Pamela Park Reconstruction October 25, 2013 ID CONSTRUCTION �AqA TV CONSTRUCTION There are many facets to a fee proposal and the selection of the right Construction Manager for your project. We find that although fee varies little from one firm to another, the amount of service, especially during preconstruction, can vary dramatically. Of additional importance is the willingness of the constructor to operate on a 100% open book basis. This is something RJM Construction believes in and practices. Preconstruction Services RJM will provide all preconstruction services for the project as outlined below: • Work with team to assemble a preliminary master project budget. • Work with team to assemble a comprehensive project schedule which includes pre- construction and construction activities required of the entire project team. • Provide budget estimates at the end of conceptual Design Development and at 90% Construction Drawings. • Provide value engineering opportunities at each budget phase. • Perform cost benefits and life cycle analysis and provide value engineering opportunities. • Provide a phased design and bidding plan structured to reduce total project schedule for expedited facility completion. • Develop bidding strategy that is economically advantageous for the project. • Identify potential bid alternates to be utilized for either project enhancements or to ensure compliance with the project budget. • Review plans and specifications for consistency and constructability. • Coordinate preliminary coordination with utility companies and city municipalities and procure required building permits. • Work with team to prepare all required construction contracts. • Advertise and coordinate receipt of all public bids. Construction Services RJM will provide all construction services for the project as outlined below: • Make recommendations to the City of Edina for award of low bidders. • Prepare and issue contracts for all contractors. • Schedule and conduct weekly meetings to coordinate activities of the contractors. • Provide an on -site superintendent to schedule work and monitor quality of work being performed. • Closely track all project budgets and aggressively scrutinize all cost claims made by contractors. • Provide an overall project schedule and manage contractors as needed to meet required milestone dates. • Administer all submittals and RA's required for the project. 4 TV CONSTRUCTION • Conduct a thorough punchlist at substantial completion of construction and efficiently manage the completion of all items. • Coordinate all systems training by the contractors. • Collect and provide close -out documents and submit to the City of Edina. Based upon our years of direct experience, the complexity of the project and the duration of the project, we respectively offer a construction services fee of 2.85% of the total construction cost of the project. Reimbursable General Conditions Once we are able to meet with the team and confirm project scope and anticipated design time an overall project schedule can be established. The following reimbursement costs are shown as a per month basis. These costs represent a not -to- exceed amount per month. Should any savings be realized, they will be returned 100% to the City of Edina. General Superintendent $1,520 Superintendent $10,200 Project Manager $4,080 Safety Director $510 General Clean -up $1,400 Trucking /Mobilization $500 Pickup Fuel & Oil $500 Telephones $150 Printing $300 Postage $100 Internal Equipment Charges $700 Total Monthly General Conditions $19,960 Project Management Personnel RJM proposes the following rates for project management personnel, reimbursed as a cost of the work. Project Executive $110 /hr Project Manager $95 /hr Chief Estimator $125 /hr Administrative Assistant $50 /hr General Superintendent $95 /hr Superintendent $85 /hr Assistant Superintendent $74 /hr Safety Director $95 /hr Resumes TV CONSTRUCTION I Brian Recker Senior Vice President brian.recker @rjmconstruction.com 952- 837 -8636 Brian Recker graduated in 1992 with a Structural Engineering degree from the University of Minnesota, at which time he entered the commercial construction industry. He has had the pleasure of completing projects in a variety of markets such as public, community, religious, education, industrial, office, aquatic and ice arena. Brian leads RJM Construction's community market specializing in serving governmental and non - profit agencies throughout Minnesota. Brian will work directly with Paul Kolias to lead the RJM Construction team directly throughout the preconstruction process and alongside Paul during construction. His role will include assisting with value engineering and constructability studies, establishment of the construction budget, establishment of the project schedule, bidding and contract strategy, and the development of team relationships. Experience Client Reference City of Edina Golf Dome Mr. Tim Simon Edina, Minnesota City of Elk River City of Maple Grove Sports Dome 763- 635 -1090 Maple Grove, Minnesota Mr, James Dickinson City of Andover City of Andover YMCA and Community Center 763- 767 -5110 Andover, Minnesota City of Eden Prairie Mr. Jay lotthammer Community Center and Ice Arena City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota 952- 949 -8440 City of Elk River Architect Reference Community Center and YMCA Mr. Ed Kodet Elk River, Minnesota Kodet Architecture City of Worthington 612- 377 -2737 Community YMCA Worthington, Minnesota Mr. Greg Fenton BWBR Architects Education 651 -290 -1877 Bachelor of Science Degree Civil Engineering -1992 Mr. Mark Wentzell University of Minnesota 292 Design Group Masters in Business Administration 763 -533 -3813 2004 U of M, Carlson School of Management CONSTRUCTION TV CONSTRUCTION Paul Kolias Project Executive paul.kolias @rjmconstruction.com 952- 893 -7593 Paul has been in the construction industry since 1989 and brings multiple years of experience to his role as project executive. This depth of knowledge is invaluable as he offers leadership to clients through project negotiations, design review, site logistics, cost and schedule analysis, contract management and project administration. Paul's experience has been gained through his involvement with various project types including public sector, recreational, educational, tenant improvements, financial, retail, restaurant, mixed use, major renovation, and new construction work. He is skilled in unique and complicated projects where extensive pre - planning is required to create real project value. Through his management style that focuses on team building and project communications, Paul has managed and built lasting relationships. Experience City of Edina Golf Dome Edina, Minnesota City of Medina Public Works, City Hall & Police Station Medina, Minnesota City of Edina Braemar Ice Arena Expansion Edina, Minnesota Blaisdell YMCA Minneapolis, Minnesota Minnehaha Academy South Campus Minneapolis, Minnesota Hazelden Foundation (Multiple Projects) Minneapolis, Minnesota Open Arms of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Education Bachelor of Applied Science Degree Construction Management University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Client Reference Ms. Colleen Wigg YWCA of Minneapolis 612- 215 -4204 Ms. Ann Kattreh City of Edina 952 -826 -0430 Mr. Scott Johnson City of Medina 763 - 473 -4643 Architect Reference Mr. Mark Wentzell 292 Design Group 612- 767 -3773 Mr. Paul Holmes Pope Architects 651 - 789 -1582 Mr. Nick Sperides Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. 952- 996 -9662 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: January 21, 2014 wg1�,r� ,eae Agenda Item #: IV. L. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ® Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Contract #I 3-8PK, Architectural Services, Pamela Park Shelter Building, Pamela Park Renovation Project, Wendel Companies Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 Company: Wendel Companies Recommended Quote or Bid: Wendel Companies Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $46,750.00 General Information: On October 14, 2013 the City Council directed staff to proceed with the development of plans and specifications for the renovation of Pamela Park, including a new park shelter building. Staff has worked with Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc. since 2009 to develop a master plan for Pamela Park. A new shelter building was part of this plan. Staff is preparing an AIA Document B 132 - 2009 contract with Wendel. This contract is being reviewed and will be approved by City Attorney Roger Knutson. Wendel Companies recently worked for the Edina Parks & Recreation Department on the architectural design and plans for the Countryside Park shelter building. Wendel Companies also provided architectural services for the newer shelter buildings at Cornelia, Todd, Walnut Ridge, Weber and Wooddale Parks. Site planning, landscape architecture and civil engineering for the south athletic field renovation, southeast (senior lighted) athletic field, north (senior) athletic field, north parking lot, west parking lot, south parking lot, and paved trails and construction management services will be provided by other contractors. A working group of Park Board, athletic associations, neighborhood and staff members will be assembled and approved by the Park Board to oversee the design of the building. Estimated construction costs are $400,000 - $500,000 which would potentially include additional storage for athletic associations, park maintenance and recreation programming. A concession stand will also be explored. Staff began working with Mark Ruff, Senior Financial Advisor /Principal from Ehlers regarding the financing for this project. This contract would be paid as part of the funding package for the Sports Dome, outdoor rink, Arena improvements and Pamela Park renovation projects. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Attachments: Fee Proposal City of Edina c 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN 10wendel January 14, 2014 Ms. Ann Kattreh; Director Edina Parks and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN, 55424 Ann: Wendel SGN Architecture (dba Wendel) is pleased to submit the following proposal for Architecture and Engineering services for the proposed Pamela Park Shelter project. Based on our previous work for Edina Parks, we feel that we are well qualified to provide the services required for the project. Our understanding of the project is that Edina Parks would like to replace the park shelter at Pamela Park with a new park shelter with similar features to the shelter designed by Wendel at Countryside Park. In addition to the spaces provided at Countryside, the program may include additional storage space and a concession space. The new shelter will also need to incorporate spaces for the existing City well head and chlorine room. Based on that information, we would anticipate a one -story structure of approximately 2,500 — 3,000 square feet. Per our discussion, the following work will be included in our scope of services: A. Preliminary Planning Services • Initial meeting with Park Department staff • Program review • Site analysis / study (coordination with Anderson Johnson) • Conceptual drawings • Meetings with staff, neighborhood group, Park Board and City Council B. Basic Architectural and Engineering Design Services • Schematic Design • Design Development • Construction Documents • Bidding and Negotiation • Construction Administration Based on the above scope, we propose to provide Architectural /Engineering services for a lump sum fixed fee of $46,750.00. 111 Washington Avenue North, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55401 p 612.332.1401 f 612.332.1405 w wendelcompanies.com grourrdbrealdn Owendel The proposed fee is based on the following assumptions: • Architecture, Structural, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering are included. Civil Engineering and Landscape Architecture will be provided by Anderson Johnson Associates under separate contract. • Electrical Engineering for site work (scoreboards, field lighting, etc.) is not included. • RJM Construction has been retained by the City to provide Construction Management services for the project. Cost estimating will be provided by RJM, and is not included in our services. • Meetings and submittals as required for zoning approval and building permits are included. Any fees required to secure these approvals are not included. • Site survey and geotechnical report (soil borings) shall be provided by the Owner. • It is anticipated that the project will be publicly bid for lump sum general construction. This fee proposal is based on standard terms and conditions of the AIA B132 Agreement between Owner and Architect (2009), except as noted here. C. Reimbursable Expenses • No charge for mileage, lodging, meals, photocopying, fax and telephone. • Costs for outside printing, express delivery/courier service and required agency review fees will be billed at actual invoiced cost (no mark -up). If this is acceptable, please contact me and we will draft a contract for your review. Sincerely, WENDEL SGN ARCHITECTURE Jim Wilson, AIA, LEED AP Associate To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: January 21, 2014 w9A,r� tit �;�A �o • !1•CnRPORf`1EO • Jess Agenda Item #: IV. M. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget Z Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Contract - Construction Management Services, Pamela Park Renovation Project, RJM Construction Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Thursday, December 12, 2013 Company: RJM Construction Recommended Quote or Bid: RJM Construction Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: 2.85% of total construction cost or approximately $87,552 General Information: On October 14, 2013 the City Council directed staff to proceed with the development of plans and specifications for the renovation of Pamela Park. An AIA Document C 132 — 2009 contract for construction management services for the Pamela Park renovation project has been reviewed and approved by City Attorney Roger Knutson. The fee represents approximately $87,552, which is 2.85% of the estimated $3,072,000 project construction cost. This project cost includes the park shelter building but does not include project contingency, design fees, survey, soil borings, testing, permits, etc. In addition to Pamela Park and the Sports Dome, Ice Rink and Arena improvement projects, RJM Construction provided construction management services to the City of Edina Parks & Recreation Department for the Hornets Nest and Golf Dome construction projects. Staff began working with Mark Ruff, Senior Financial Advisor /Principal from Ehlers regarding the financing for this project. This contract would be paid as part of the funding package for the Sports Dome, outdoor rink, Arena improvements and Pamela Park renovation projects. Attachments: Pamela Park Improvement Project Cost Estimates Exhibit A — Fee Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424 ANDERSON- JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, /INC. Low, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE• SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55417 FAX (763) 544 -0531 PII (763) 544 -7119 October 8, 2013 Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Parks & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed Improvements at Pamela Park 4301 W 58th St., Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ann: As requested, we are pleased to provide this updated Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the proposed improvements at Pamela Park. Also attached is the Schematic Plan which generally illustrates the proposed improvements and serves as the basis for the cost estimate. As noted, we've included survey and soil boring costs in each "project cost ". If projects are combined, the overall cost for survey and borings will likely be lower. Also, it is worth noting that a wetland delineation will be necessary as the proposed field construction may directly or indirectly impact adjacent wetlands. The `window' for accomplishing wetland delineation services has `closed' for the season, so it is important to understand that final permit approval from the watershed may not be able to occur until next May. We recommend bidding the project(s) this Winter/ Spring, however, there may be revisions required due to based on final review comments by the watershed. OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION & PROJECT COSTS 1. Grass (South) Athletic Field Renovation Construct a sand -peat athletic field (160'x 300') north of the South Parking Lot to support football, soccer, lacrosse and rugby. The field would be smaller than a regulation football field and would be used primarily as a practice field (which is how the area is currently used); however, this smaller field can also be scheduled for younger athletic game events. As a note, due to the existence of delineated wetlands and taking into account the elevation of the established storm water flood plain it has been determined that the field can be constructed, although the field size would need to be smaller in size than the existing field to the east. Estimated Construction Cost............ $ 440,000. 5% Contingency: ................. $22,000. Engineer's Design Fees (6 %):....... $26,000. Survey, Soil Borings: ............... $8,000. Testing, Permits, Etc.: .............. $2,000. Estimated Project Cost ......................... $ 498,000. I 2. Synthetic Turf at Southeast Athletic Field Construct artificial turf over the footprint of the existing (380' x 225') natural grass athletic field with lights. Install perimeter protection around the field to deter vehicles- the preferred protection barrier would be either a stone bench system (similar to that at the Edina High School artificial turf field) or bollard system (similar to bollards with chains at Arden Park and Creek Valley Park. Estimated Construction Cost.......... $ 1,250,000. 5% Contingency: ................. $62,500. Engineer's Design Fees (5.5 %):..... $68,500. Survey, Soil Borings: .............. $11,000. Testing, Permits, Etc.: .............. $4,000. Estimated Project Cost .................... $ 1,396,000. Alternate: Construct Southeast Athletic Field with sand -peat in lieu of synthetic turf: Renovate the existing field including excavation and import of new sand/peat topsoil. Provide new drain tile system, irrigation system and seed (Similar to Items 1 and 3). Estimated Project Cost .............................. $ 500,000. 3. Senior (North) Athletic Field Renovation Renovate the existing field including excavation and import of new sand/peat topsoil. Provide new drain tile system, irrigation system and seed. Estimated Construction Cost............. $ 460,000. 5% Contingency: ................. $23,000. Engineer's Design Fees (6 %):....' ... $27,500. Survey, Soil Borings: ............... $8,000. Testing, Permits, Etc.: .............. $2,500. Estimated Project Cost ..................... $ 521,000. 4. North Parking Lot Renovation and Expansion Reclaim and re -pave the North Drive (off 58"' Street) and Parking Lot. Construct new concrete curbing along the drive and around the perimeter of the lot to improve the flow of traffic into the north parking. lot (near the park shelter building), create more parking capacity where possible and stripe the lot to make parking safer and more efficient. Expand the lot immediately west of the park building to gain an additional 15 stalls. Estimated Construction Cost............ $ 115,000. 5% Contingency: .................. $5,000. Engineer's Design Fees (6 %):........ $7,000. Survey, Soil Borings: ............... $3,000. Estimated Project Cost ..................... $ 130,000. 5. West Parking Lot Renovation and Expansion Reclaim and re -pave the West Parking Lot (off Oaklawn Avenue) including new concrete curbing around the perimeter of the lot and a short ( -2' high) retaining wall to transition grade along the west edge of the lot. The improvements will afford —37 more parking stalls. Estimated Construction Cost ............. $ 75,000. 5% Contingency: .................. $4,000. Engineer's Design Fees (6 %):........ $4,500. Survey, Soil Borings: ............... $3,500. Estimated Project Cost ...................... $ 87,000. 6. South Parking Lot Renovation and Expansion Repair, crack seal and seal coat the South Parking Lot and Drive (off 62nd Street). Redesign the existing lot configuration to be more efficient (add about 20 -23 stalls) and expand the lot northward and westward to gain an additional 43 stalls. Note, young trees would have to be relocated. Estimated Construction Cost ............. $ 95,000. 5% Contingency: .................. $5,000. Engineer's Design Fees (6 %):........ $6,000. Estimated Project Cost ..................... $ 106,000. 7. Paved Trail Access to Playground Construct a paved trail between the south and west parking lots and to the playground equipment. Estimated Construction Cost ............. $ 35,000. 5% Contingency: .................. $2,000. Engineer's Design Fees (8 %):........ $3,000. Estimated Project Cost ...................... $ 39,000. 8. Paved and Environmental Trails Construct a paved and `environmental' trail around the perimeter of the park for better, easier, and accessible access to the park amenities and to support environmental discovery and learning. Estimated Construction Cost............ $ 102,000. 5% Contingency: .................. $5,000. Engineer's Design Fees (8 %):........ $8,000. Estimated Project Cost ..................... $ 115,000. 9. Park Shelter Building Improvements In 2009, four concept drawings were proposed for consideration, all of which included much needed additional storage, plus a larger and more user - friendly room for community gatherings, meetings and skate changing, plus a kitchen/concessions area, drinking fountain and outdoor picnic patio space. If funding is available, the expansion will require more study and community input before a final plan is selected. Ann, we trust the above information is clear and understandable. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully Submitted, Anderson - Johnson ,LLA Attachment - Pamela Park Master Plan Study (updated October 8, 2013) PAMELA PARK MASTER PLAN ORIGINALLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 6, 2009 �, �`'i `• . �, !` - A y " I , 2 i L > nuoc.no„ocxn �'If'j ■uav�naw� r-�=� �I 1 ti ww •,ww.n,.. � ue,r.��°D�... L cw•waTZpi{rHi O EROOKV'CV 6VE Lu I { I I OCTOBER 8, 2013 r 1 - Grass (So w.y 2 - Synthetic " =a 3 - Senior (Nc 4 - North Party 5 - West Park ;n 6 - South Parl `, ' 7 - Paved Tra 8 - Paved anc 9 - Park Shelt e '4 t ' „T s r e MO.!F t;7 n MASTER PLAN STUDY PAMELA PARK, EDINA MINNESOTA .xnm.ron. mnnTOn d, wuna.lnc mt ANDERSON- JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING 7575 GOLDEN VALLEYROAD SUITE200 MINNEAPOLIS. AIN55427 FAX (763) 544 -0531 P11(763) 544 -7119 December 10, 2013 Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Parks & Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Professional Services - Site Planning, Landscape Architecture and Civil Engineering Proposed Improvements at Pamela Park 4301 W 5th St. Edina 55424 DIE As requested, we are pleased to provide this fee proposal for design services for the proposed improvements of the fields at the Pamela Park. Below, we have included a tentative project schedule for your review. Also attached is our letter defining the construction and project costs estimated for each project along with a sketch which generally illustrates the proposed improvements. THE PROJECT (S) We originally studied several field and parking lot improvements at Pamela Park in 2009. We updated the scope of work and costs this past June and are refining costs now that, we understand, the City Council may be close to moving ahead with the ball field- related work, and they may package these improvements with "a sports dome deal ". The projects, as summarized with the attached "Opinion of Probable Construction & Project Costs" letter and sketch are as follows: 1. South Athletic Field Renovation (Sand -Peat) Estimated Construction Cost....... $440,000. 2. Synthetic Turf at Southeast Athletic Field Estimated Construction Cost.:.... $1,250,000. 3. Senior/North Athletic Field Renovation (Sand -Peat) Estimated Construction Cost....... $460,000. 4. North Parking Lot Renovation and Expansion Estimated Construction Cost....... $ 115,000. 5?°W t°Par g Lot- env of � mand aeon Estimated Construction Cost........ , It [ I 11r 11E. I $75,000. 61 SoutfhlP Jg L�Ioltevaon� < -Eic ansi�i � s �t��mated Construction Cost........ 9. Patedl Accless t� Pla groun 1646 died Construction Cost........ $95,000. $35,000. 8. Paved and Environmental Trails Estimated Construction Cost....... $102,000. Sub -Total Construction: $2,572,000. ANTICIPATED PROJECT APPROACH Anderson- Johnson Associates, Inc. (AJA) proposes to render landscape architecture, site planning, and civil engineering services as follows: A. Data Collection • Obtain topographic and partial boundary survey of the development site. Costs for this data is not included in this proposal, therefore shall be paid direct by the Owner. • Obtain wetland delineation report for the project site. Costs for this data is not included in this proposal; therefore shall be paid direct by the Owner. • Obtain soil boring data with analysis and report on structural capabilities of soils go rore o e s .a p t direct by the pyyn ata is not included in this ose im em nts. Costs or this er. .siteq�deii�.aturalstraints/ opportunities which may affect the proposed project. • Gather data from-City, where applicable. • Meet jointly with Owner to obtain input on design and to establish a preliminary program for improvements. • Refine, with Owner, the Program Facility proposed improvements. B. Project Analysis, Conceptual Layouts and Schematic Designs • Analyze data gathered from above phase, including a review of the Owner's program. Accomplish preliminary site schematic design(s). • Review designs with Owner and redefine, if necessary, parameters and objectives. • Meet with City staff to understand current site design requirements including Planning and Zoning requirements and time lines, storm water management requirements and guidelines and associated procedures for review. • Revise design, in accordance with requirements prescribed by Owner. C. Design Development • Prepare Design Development Plans. • Prepare/ Refine Opinion of Probable Construction Costs. °-9 Construction Costs Zi • fhwnbtain�°p'pzo� to ,ro�eed to construction documents phase. A L eettfh lime 1Cr'k V�atanh'�d Di trict t revi s o ew the project. D. Construction Documents • Prepare Construction Documents based on approved Design Development Plans, including working drawings and technical specifications. • Attend Park & Recreation, Planning Commission and City Council meetings to support the Owner for approval of the project, as necessary; Attend watershed meeting to obtain approval for the project. • Prepare Proposal and Bidding Documents. • Prepare General, Supplemental and Special Conditions of the Contract. Submit Construction Documents to Owner for review and approval for bidding. E. Bidding Prepare Advertisement for Bids. Assist Owner in obtaining Proposals. Analyze proposals, make recommendations to Owner. F. Contract Administration and Construction Observation • Prepare and issue Notice to Proceed to successful bidder. • Conduct Preconstruction Conference. • Make periodic on -site observations. • Provide interpretation of contract documents as required. • Review testing of construction materials. � _ Prepare andro,�es than . or ers if necessary. C .�ttIlrac'to 's r .'e -o p tial payment. dial insp d i h ® nd Contractor. • Make final inspection, with Owner and Contractor. • Prepare letter of substantial completion. • Certify Contractor's request for final payment. ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Anderson- Johnson Associates staff members are available immediately to work with you on this project. We understand it the intent of the City of Edina to accomplish design work this Fall] Winter to afford construction during the Summer of 2014. With that, we proposed the following project schedule. Please keep in mind, this design and construction - related schedule may change as agency review timing becomes more clear and may depend on bidding climate, weather delays during construction, and other factors outside of our control. We will update the schedule as we move ahead. Planning and Design October 2013: Authorization to proceed with Pamela Park Field Improvements. November 2013: Authorization for survey, wetland delineation and soil boring services (by others). Receive early- December. December 1-3: -w-% t� .tgle leXi rrt� cia a ons; Coaches, etc. to review the intended scope P wog k and te Iesr January 2014: Complete Design Development documents for Owner review and acceptance. Proceed with Construction Document preparation. Meet with Nine -Mile Creek Watershed staff to review the project. Early- February 2014: Provide/ submit Preliminary (90 %) Construction Documents for Agency Plan Review. Meet with Watershed staff to review the project. Mid - February 2014: Submit Final Plans to City and Nine -Mile Creek Watershed District for review/ approval. Jan / Feb 2014: Park & Recreation, Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Mid - February 2014: Advertisement for Bids issued. Bid documents printed and available to qualified contractors. Mid -March 2014: Bid Opening and City Council Approval 'May 2014: Commence construction. Mid - August 2014: Substantial Completion- ready for seed, synthetic turf complete. Seed will require an establishment period of approximately 12 months. FEE PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ndersTa'ndpthe7abovend base's ,pro�ct�d's�90 elated construction cost'of approximately $2.572 3pillider §on Johnso\n'�ssoca�es, Inc,�i�po�` provi de Site Planning, Landscape Architecture and Civil Engineering services described herein for a lump sum fee of $147,890.00 (or approximately 5.75% of the construction cost estimate). For invoicing purposes, our phase breakdown of fee will be as follows: Schematic Design 150/,o Design Development 20% Construction Documents 40% Bidding 5% Construction Administration and Observation 20% Reimbursable expenses, such as mileage, copies, printing, etc., will be invoiced per the Fee Schedule below. Likewise, if additional services are requested of Anderson- Johnson Associates, Inc., we can either provide an amended proposal or invoice at the hourly rates described. Our hourly rates are as follows: Secretary $ 56 per hour Civil / CADD Technician $ 75 per hour Civil Engineer, EIT $ 84 per hour Landscape Architect $103 per hour Landscape Architect, ASLA $118 per hour �&V E,,ngirrees , -P '= 118 'ear h�jur -Seriio"`i Civi-n eer, PE : 43 e�hbur Seib`r°� ar�dsca�' e ch ect PAS LA ' 4P P Photocopies $0.15 / page Plotting $2.75 / page Color Plotting (on photo paper) 24x36 $10.50 / page 30x42 $11.25 / page Postage Equal to cost Mileage $0.75 per mile Outsourced Reproduction At Cost + 20% We trust the above information is clear and understandable. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I will be happy to review the Plan(s) with you and your colleagues at your convenience. ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER - SIGNATURE This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year written below and is executed in at least two original copies, one of which is to be delivered to the Consultant and one to the Owner. ANDERSON- JOHNSON ASSOCIA IN T By Date: December 11, 2013 CITY OF EDINA .0 Date: Attachment - Pamela Park Master Plan Study (updated October 8, 2013) IORT RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra A. Mangen City Clerk Date: January 21, 2014 Subject: Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Action Requested: None. 1N A.. • ,�<<�1t 1'051 P7 t" • tHHH Agenda Item #: V. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Information / Background: There is no packet data for this item. Mr. Bigalke will be making a presentation. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REP ®RT / ' ECOI��IMf:NDATI®N To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Dave Nelson, Interim Chief of Police Action ED Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License — St. Patrick's Catholic Church February 15, 2.014 Action Requested: Approve the Temporary Intoxicating On -Sale Liquor License for the Church of St. Patrick's, A Night at the Opera event. Information / Background: The Church of St. Patrick has applied for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for their "A Night at the Opera" event. The event will be held in the on -site social hall and in the adjoining kitchen on February 15, 2014 from 6:00 PM to 10:30 PM. The applicants are eligible for the Liquor License and have submitted plans to meet the special requirements for a Temporary License under City Code. There have been no problems with prior temporary licenses issued to this facility. The Church of St. Patrick has hired the Edina Police Department to provide security for this event. S�y O To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #i VIII. A. From: Debra Mangen Action ❑ City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information Subject: Approve Joint Goals With Independent School District 273 Edina Public Schools Action Requested: None. Information / Background: This item will appear on the February 3, 2014 agenda for consideration by the City Council. It was not able to be completed for inclusion in the January 21, 2014 packet. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Q'� e 0 a� v �y • l�CORPORp`��O • i88B To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #• VIII. B. From: Ann Kattreh Action Parks & Recreation Director Discussion ❑ Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Edina Rotary Foundation Donation of Heirloom Clock for Centennial Lakes Park Action Requested: Approve Edina Rotary Foundation Donation of Heirloom Clock for Centennial Lakes Park Information / Background: In honor of the Edina Quasquicentennial, The Edina Rotary Foundation would like to donate an heirloom clock to be placed at Centennial Lakes Park. Staff has selected a location for the clock in front of the Hughes Pavilion. Please see attached proposed location diagram. The two faced Howard Replica clock is approximately 15'6" tall, including a 3'8" diameter face. The clock exterior is made of aluminum and is weather proof. The clock has its own battery back up in the event of a power outage. The clock requires minimal maintenance and service plans are available if needed. The life expectancy of the clock is over 30 years. Between years 10 and 15 a renovation service is recommended to replace worn parts and refinish the clock as needed. The clock is made by the Verdin Company in Cincinnati, Ohio. The Verdin Company has been in business for 170 years and has installed over 400 post clocks across the country. The clock will cost approximately $25,000. The Edina Rotary Foundation has $26,000 allocated for this project and the remainder of the funds will go toward site preparation including a concrete pad and electrical connections. The recommended location has electrical connections readily accessible. Attachments: Rotary Club of Edina Letter Clock Rendering Clock Specifications Recommended Location City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 EDINA ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA t vi1 4801 W. 50TH ST. EDINA, MN 55424 MINNESOTA USA,. mm+c.esso Fw.mEnien /// www.EDINAROTARY.ORG 612-875-3109 Dec. 17, 2013 Edina City Council 4801 W. Sot' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council: In honor of Edina's quasquicentennial, the Edina Rotary Foundation would like to give the City of Edina an heirloom clock to be placed at Centennial Lakes Park at a location selected by City staff in front of the Hughes Pavilion. The clock would be custom -made by The Verdin Company in Ohio. A rendering of the proposed clock is attached, If you've noticed a magnificent timepiece gracing a city square, courthouse, university or business center, chances are it's a Verdin. Creating fine timepieces for churches, courthouses, town squares, airports, amusement parks, shopping centers, public parks and university campuses has been the hallmark of Verdin's clock business since the company's founding in 1842. Since then, Verdin has specialized in the repair, manufacture, installation, and innovation of clocks. In 1860, Alois Nicholas Verdin, one of the founders, invented a winder that revolutionized —and simplified —the winding of clocks. Over the decades, Verdin has become known as the builders of the finest tower clocks and post clocks in the world. Verdin clocks are nearly maintenance free. Verdin has placed other clocks in Minnesota. The closest one may be in Anoka. The clock we would like to give the City is a "Howard Replica" and would include the Rotary emblem in the center of each side of the clock, symbolizing the longtime partnership between our service club and the City of Edina. The value of the clock is approximately $25,000. Because of the value, we would like you to formally accept the donation at an upcoming City Council meeting. Once approved, we will work with Parks & Recreation staff to make final design determinations such as paint color and then place the order. Our hope is that the clock can be erected and dedicated in the spring or early summer, in time for the park's busiest season of the year. Please let me know if you have any questions about the clock. Otherwise, we will wait to hear if the Council has approved the donation. Thank you Sincere) Scott MacDonald Past President Rotary Club of Edina ENC 4 � � 7 ✓_ 12' kO JL • 1� t.' T - j� • �� i � - .� - •.� 111.7 5� • '1 . it ._ x . ..` �� b5.rp 4 �'► it j tv Aachim lu '4 t4l . � y �F�IN RENDERING PREPARED FOR: - - t ' l •I 1 i T .. The Gry-d Edna Edina. \iN �[alrl -IF Rntur Peal Nor.30.1O12 '".' 74ispholo-re xleru�S it zi app roiirnafion of the Ve+din dock on your. and is lrof ' //Y a.�. r t int ended fo be rued as final artwork for ' .f .. BELiS&CLOCKS header felt a,d dlaf art. SINCE 1842 PROPERLY OF THE VERDIN COMPANY Gncinu OH800- 593- OA88 /vww.verdn.mm +' 1' -3y2" 3' -Sy2" [1.13 M] x0.39 Ml x g 0 n a I un cfl Ln N V -5" [0.43 M] MODEL No. 4K SO. BASE Scale: Y2 "= 1' 0" BEZEL" P. EA. SIDE) "COVER' 1/8" TH'k CLEAR "COVER: (TYP EA SIDE) iTD "ROMAN' NUMERAL AL WITH SPADE WDS (SHOWN) 5" OPEN'G FOR ACCESS W /COVERS (TYP. EA. SIDE) 'PHOTO CELL" AUTO "ON" AT DUSK AND "OFF" AT DAWN. SIDE ELEVATION SPECIFICATIONS: TWO FACED, 36 inch. [0.91 M] LEGIBLE 31 -3/4 inch. [0.81 M] REAR ILLUMINATION FACE WITH "SPADE" HANDS. ALUMINUM POST WEATHER PROOF FINISH COLORS OPTIONS AVAILABLE - "ACCESS PANEL" REMOVABLE TWO SIDE FOR ACCESS TO "FAST -SET" CONTROL MODULE, MTG. OF POST (BY GEN. CONT'R.) AND ELEC. "HOOK -UP" (BY ELEC. CONT-R.) *ALL PANELS HAVE TAMPER -PROOF SCREWS AS REO'D w/ TOOL BY VERDIN. VERDIN DESIGN GROUP THE VERDIN COMPANY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 444 READING ROAD CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 1- 800 -543 -0488 sales @verdin.com www.verdin.com THIS DESIGN CONCEPT IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE VERDIN COMPANY, AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, REPRODUCED, MANUFACTURED, MARKETED, OR SOLD IN WHOLE OR ANY PART THEREOF WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF L Centennial Lakes Park Hughes Pavilion Clock Location s -- J f 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: January 21, 2014 Subject: Resolution No. 2014-11 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. 4,91N�� V Agenda Item #: VIII. C. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ O .�y Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipients departments for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014-11 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-11 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property, for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Fire Department: Mr. F. C. Closuit $25.00 Dow Chemical Foundation $3,000.00 Braemar Memorial Fund: Timothy Jordheim $25.00 Wililam Colby $100.00 Chip Fuhrmann $175.00 Edina Park Department: Rotay Club Heirloom Clock Edina Neighborhood Association $25.00 Edina Police Department Edina Crime Prevention Fund $15,000.00 Dated: January 21, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK To Be Installed At Centennial Lakes Winter Neighborhood Night Out.— Weber Park 2013 K -9 Expense Reimbursement James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2014-11 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with- sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Fire Department: Mr. F. C. Closuit $25.00 Dow Chemical Foundation $3,000.00 Braemar Memorial Fund Timothy Jordheim $25.00 William Colby $100.00 Chip Fuhrmann $175.00 Edina Park Department: Rotary Club Heirloom Clock Morningside Neighborhood Assn. $25.00 Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Prevention Fund $15,000.00 Dated: January 21, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK To be Installed Centennial Lakes Winter Neighborhood Night Out — Weber Park 2013 K -9 Expense Reimbursement James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: January 21, 2014 Subject: Sketch Plan — 3210 Southdale Circle (Taco Bell) Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Information / Background: iA •� a ISO$ .� Agenda Item #: VIII. D. Action Discussion Information ❑ The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing building and rebuild a new slightly smaller Taco Bell at 3210 Southdale Circle. The applicant would seek a Site Plan review and variance to develop the site. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A I —A 12 of the Planning Commission memo.) Several variances would be required. The applicant has not approached the site plan to meet city code requirements. Rather, they have recognized the small size of the site, and designed a site plan to work on the site. In 1985, a parking stall setback variance was granted to add parking stalls for what was then a Zantigo Mexican Restaurant. The variance was to match the existing non - conforming setback of three feet. As noted above, a four -foo't setback for parking is proposed. The building would be made of Direct Exterior Finish System (DEFS), with prefinished metal and masonry veneer accents. (See building renderings and colors on pages A9 -Al2 of the Planning Commission memo.) The applicant is proposing a 15 -foot landscape area along the east lot line, and angled the menu board more to the south, to minimize impact on the single - family homes to the east. Planning. Commission Consideration: On January 7, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the January 7, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, January 7, 2013 A. Sketch Plan — Taco Bell 3210 Southdale Circle Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing Taco Bell building and rebuild a new slightly smaller building at 3210 Southdale Circle. Teague reported that the applicant would proceed with Site Plan review and variance approval erty are in cted on the ication is established ird could be oard south ehicle stacking ig to tear at the Edina ig building; however, it is 23'5" longer. Schneider explained the circulation on the site in one way and the same is proposed with the new structure. Schneider acknowledged that the request requires variance; however, she believes the increase in landscaping and turning radius in the one -way circulation pattern provides a better more efficient and safe site. Schneider also noted this layout allows for better placement of the audio box/menu board. Comments /Questions Chair Staunton asked Ms. Schneider if Border is concerned about their long range plans. Staunton pointed out the property adjacent to the north is available and wondered if any interest was given to speak with those property owners. Ms. Schneider responded they approached the property owners to the north (best Buy) and inquired if they had any desire to purchase the Taco Bell site and incorporate it into their site; however, to date there has been no movement from the owners of the Best Buy site one way or another Commissioner Grabiel asked if building design was contr..olled: by the corporate office. Schneider responded in the affirmative. She said Taco 9611 sites.are managed very carefully Continuing, Grabiel said he finds the Southdale Circle properties to be a bit unusual, noting it's unusual in Edina to have R- I residential properties abutting commercial. Planner Teague agreed, adding he would do some research on this development. Commissioner Schroeder commented that he understands Ordinance stacking requirements; however, wonders if it would be a good idea to allow some leniency when a project is redeveloped that opens up to the st(eet:providing a more pedestrian feel and creating a better pedestrian experience. Planner Teague responded that could be looked into pointing out the Commission continually discusses the Ordinance:' Ms. Schneider interjected that Taco Bell has a stacking formula of 5 vehicles from the,addio box/menu board :Schroeder noted if the building is allowed to be pulled closer to the street it may provide the right number of stacking spaces to relocate the audio box/menu board ;:Ms Sthneider.responded that they will look into that suggestion; howev er, item they need to keep in mind `is the location of the transformer. Chair Staunton asked if the site is buffered on -the east. Ms. Schneider responded that presently there 1s ::a 'fence to the east::. Schneider said with the buildings rearrangement they hope to be able to add: Spruce trees, Which is her ;opinion would provide better screening for the residential 8perties. Schneider also added that deciduous trees are planted on the neighbors' side of the fence.". Commissioner Forrest:said she':has a concern with the potential for cars idling as they wait for pickup, adding she wants:everything done to minimize wait time creating a better environment for the residential property: owners to the east. Commissioner Platteter questioned if this would be a good area to construct sidewalks (if there aren't any), pointing out there is a big push for sidewalks in the area especially if redevelopment occurs on both the Best Buy and Wickes site. Continuing, Platteter asked if any patio seating is planned. Ms. Schneider responded that the site is very tight and no outdoor seating is anticipated. Commissioner Halva questioned if there could be two boards one on the north and one on the south. Ms. Schneider responded the south location could be difficult because a certain radius needs to be provided so the building isn't hit by vehicles. Chair Staunton said anything that can be done to minimize impact from the audio box/menu board would be appreciated. The discussion ensued on the following points; possible tweaking of the audio board /menu board and parking. It was again noted the discrepancy in parking stalls; however, the Commission acknowledged if doable they would rather see landscaping and screening instead of concrete. Continuing, the Commission stressed the importance of "being a good neighbor" and reiterated the importance of doing everything possible to reduce the impact of this establishment from the residential properties to the east 1. It was further discussed and acknowledged that.in many instances the Ordinance tends to over park sites; however, in this instance they want. , assurances parking would,be adequate. Commissioners questioned if the majority of the "traffic at this location Is. drive- through traffic. Ms. Schneider responded in the affirmative. The,Cornmission asked Ms. Schneider when formal application is submitted to prove that parking will be adequate` Planner Teague reported that he in reviewing Google eartbhe found there are sidewalks along the east side of York Avenue and the sidewalk: continues on the.Richfield side of Xerxes Avenue. Commissioner Fischer asked out of;curiosity what the "down time" is on a tear down /rebuild of this nature. Ms Schneider responded that' down and rebuild can be accomplished within 90 -days barring unforeseen'' obstacles. Chair Staunton thanked Ms. Schneider for presenting the sketch plan, reiterating the importance of providing screening for the residential properties to the east. B. Tree Ordinance Planner Presentation City Hall - Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 - www.CityofEdina.com Date: January 8, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 3210 Southdale Circle (Taco Bell) MEMO o O �J �y The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing building and rebuild a new slightly smaller Taco Bell at 3210 Southdale Circle. (See property location on pages Al —A3.) The applicant would seek a Site Plan review and variance to develop the site. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages Al Al2.) The compliance table below demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the current zoning of PCD -3: * Variance required City of Edina - 4801 W. 501h St. - Edina, MN 55424 City Standard PCD -3 Proposed Building Setbacks North 35 feet 50 feet South 35 feet 55 feet East 35 feet 55 feet West 35 feet 18 feet* Parking Lot/Drive Aisle Setbacks North 10 feet 4 feet* South 10 feet 4 feet* East 20 feet 20 feet West 10 feet 10 f +eet * Variance required City of Edina - 4801 W. 501h St. - Edina, MN 55424 'U_i WC 0 * Variance required As noted above, several variances would be required. The applicant has not approached the site plan to meet city code requirements. Rather, they have recognized the small size of the site, and designed a site plan to work on the site. In 1985, a parking stall setback variance was granted to add parking stalls for what was then a Zantigo Mexican Restaurant. The variance was to match the existing non - conforming setback City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard Proposed PCD -3 Building Height 4 stories or 48 feet 1 story — 22 whichever is less feet Maximum Floor Area 75% 9% Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 19 16* Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18 8.5 x 18 Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Landscaping 13 Overstory Trees 16 Overstory Trees Stacking Spaces 4 4 Menu Board & Audio May not be located Located on Systems on the side of a the side that building that faces faces residential property residential property* * Variance required As noted above, several variances would be required. The applicant has not approached the site plan to meet city code requirements. Rather, they have recognized the small size of the site, and designed a site plan to work on the site. In 1985, a parking stall setback variance was granted to add parking stalls for what was then a Zantigo Mexican Restaurant. The variance was to match the existing non - conforming setback City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 of three feet. As noted above, a four -foot setback for parking is proposed. MEMO The,,building would be made of Direct Exterior Finish System (DEFS),.with prefinished metal and masonry veneer accents. (See building renderings and colors on pages A9 —Al2) The applicant is proposing a 15 -foot landscape area along the east lot'line, and angled the menu board more to the south, to minimize impact on the single - family homes to the east. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 boi:der FOODS A C 0 M P A N I E S �l s 6W,0 -, Al" f5r, &r January 2; 2014 TO: City of Edina Planning and City Council. Members 965 Decatur Ave N Golden Valley, MN 55427 Tel: 763- 489 -2970 Fax 763 - 489 -2971 Border Foods, In is proposing;to scrape and rebuild the existing Taco Bell located at 3210 Southdale Circle, which has been operating since 1986, to a more current brand image. The location is accessed exclusively by way of Southdale Circle and is 18;70o sq. ft. Border Foods is proposing to modernize the facility, not expand it. The site layout which is proposed utilizes a building that is 1,85o sq. ft. which is 27 GSF smaller than the existing building. The new building is more narrow but it is 23'5" longer. The current site layout has one way circulation and the proposed site plan proposes the same one -way circulation flow. The area of the parcel designated as buildable (within the 35' building setback on all sides) is 4,321 sq ft. or 23.1% of the parcel. Moving the building forward, toward Southdale Circle, and beyond the front building setback line, allows the following: 1) An increase of the distance from the face of the.drive thru curb to the rear of the residential rear property Line to 45'; 2) Allows inside seating for pedestrian customers who want to visit the restaurant; 3) Allows for a more comfortable turning radius in the one -way circulation pattern; 4) Allows the 15' parking setback to be used for additional dense plant material„ screening buffer against the residential rear property line, 5) Allows better placement of the audio system and menu board to mitigate as much as possible the current menu board placement of facing directly to the rear residential property line while maintaining an angle of the menu board so the guest can have vision to the board without obstruction; 6) Allows reasonable access and safe servicing of the trash enclosure. Enclosed is a model view of the back portion of the proposed site plan depicting the menu board, and audio system in relation to the rear property line. Taco Bell utilizes a single audio and order line. This describes our rationale for the building placement beyond the front setback line. Thank you for consideration of our proposal. LT.- -- 651HSTW ' u a iI W W __ ... �c La m _. - - -._ _ - :.1fr' 5f Y�: Ti / x %n '67TH Sf W - —1 S ' I t , GT t3 H Vic 69T H AU W [L _. -;� r -cf. I 70TH ST LV Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. N ID: A -T -B: Torrens Print Date: 1/2/2014 Owner Market AT Name: Total: I Commercial- Preferred ii�• Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and OC _.- .__�' ..' -. J Sale � G -.j i 1 COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 651HSTW ' u a iI W W __ ... �c La m _. - - -._ _ - :.1fr' 5f Y�: Ti / x %n '67TH Sf W - —1 S ' I t , GT t3 H Vic 69T H AU W [L _. -;� r -cf. I 70TH ST LV Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. N ID: A -T -B: Torrens Print Date: 1/2/2014 Owner Market AT Name: Total: M G7 T H ST %V Ln Sheridan Park l,l. / ES 112. I ST W Parcel 3210 Southdale Cir Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property I Commercial- Preferred Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and OC _.- .__�' ..' -. _ Sale n `^ - -- Area: 18,810 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 CL A Think Green! M G7 T H ST %V Ln Sheridan Park l,l. / ES 112. I ST W Parcel 3210 Southdale Cir Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Sale Commercial- Preferred Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.43 acres Sale Area: 18,810 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think Green! Ii7 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page I of 1 . r ail1 ar ell h .fir , :0 0,'r".■. - _ n s, r. Parcel 29- 028 -24 -31 -0008 ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel 0.43 acres Area: 18,810 sq ft J A -T -B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: 43 Map Scale: V= 200 ft. Print Date: 1/2/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map `;@ pI i . E a Parcel 29- 028 -24 -31 -0008 ID: A -T -B: Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 3210 Southdale Cir Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Sale Commercial- Preferred Type: Sale Home- stead: Non - Homestead Parcel 0.43 acres Area: 18,810 sq ft Page 1 of 1 r >k Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N Print Date: 1/2/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Tifiint Green! A -T -B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale 10/2012 Date: Sale Code: Page 1 of 1 r >k Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N Print Date: 1/2/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Tifiint Green! �I 4 10' PARKING SETBACK TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 19 SPACES PROVIDED: 16 SPACES 18 \/ INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE i ` 35' BLDG SETBACK TRAN FORMER Lf -jmmoL-- _ —Aw— MOIL- - — s_ _ rTNU F- 10 0' PA KING ETB CK i i i ;\ I T7 t 4 10' PARKING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK -T-R�'S H TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 19 SPACES PROVIDED: 16 SPACES I INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE 35' BLDG SETBACK TRWFORMER -------------------- -- -- ENT ;Y T 0 BEL 113 1 L) U to, 12'--r 4-- 1B'- < IMAIN VICE, C E E < u L3 NTR� 4 z V7 - -------- - - ------------------ �CJBACK 35' BLDG CLEARANCE I ---- - - ---- - 10 0 PA KING SETB CK cp I WCL A -t... 0 a Taco Bell EDINA� MN 55435 Boa D-IbIP,dby. Border Foods MN—M N.. G.W,, V-y MN 55x27 W28. SF SITE PUN CIA TACO BELL EDINA. MN WCL —:TO' PARKING _SETBACK TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 19 SPACES PROVIDED: 16 SPACES le INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE 35' BLDG SETBACK IRAN FORMER L) Taco -------------------- -- - Bell LLJ I EDIN& MN SE4J5 ENT T E EEL' ID' I LLJ Y jMAIN p - C6 1 L��- N T R Y � IJ SVVICE E LO < EWIR�4 r:� 4 Li E — 1 L.--- __- -_ -35' Border => 35' BLDG BACK ------ — order Foods —�d—B --------- CLEARANCE B R r AN ��,V.I,MNS�27 19 r47— -- - - ---- --- ---- 10 01 PA KING ETB CK FEE sm —H 7--7– C SITE PLAN TADD SELL EDIN0. MN I E G e "v 6 L��� I rmuuv.rteOORRmIUO � EVERGREEN TREE ITS 2 s -Q mESa —1 Cann DO 9HRUB xorauR.rz eClnxRmn.0 PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITE SYN Wnui, coNMONNANE RETTANG I,,,E WE NDDT W.MEM RRDNNGE.RN 1s Dm. —DR, Rm ] PRNDErouSFEmry PSa 3DNS.9NOen5eNry ]S' BIB Sms�VD�uflfAOERFlIUFGRu PALSAU MEEB OF 4x5 a BuGBMLLSENNCE Pw Rio AnmY pN me 6MVU,f IFAOER.NR1FORu PRED =E 61 a Ndrc SXLeA[ SEINR2BfnY RES 5 auECUED SUSE.vv Rwaev epscme..r n , A. 5 u�RESrwmmwss Ae..v�.�.R..+.I Rear n cnn. LANasuPS cores 1. aRwFEDB, RRD,,. AMmrG.. �or Fx�. B. wEF�xPDMRIrwt�xs r�nSDUl.U� .� AGIGE�AE,R t BF..EEESFa,N�.DDO.R,mBU.r,D , „oaOw POOR DI ]. DES' DRS= <aEBMRPEn,CaDR AID EDITOMMAAE1IDI SCAMG DA. TO eo 0,E,, A,Y, DRD,,A ,«eE � oRRS�.ssocurav a uaarrrtm] srunW m.wo sRU eF a x.RDr sraF. RaF ERan DisEUS wwee um Dlur..Ea,TDU. ravrRUCTOR is RESROxsnEF . FreucnuE�rssaruxru .¢xPiEaRarnxcor.¢Frrur.FVFmoo. .. Icd as<u2w a . usrnu.NEV eFrvrtEx ME tnA W nr a qurt9 9 gvr of rIC s nEOU[ u]a rNE Dwxmr 9uwx ov ME Pcµ MF Puu sNRU GOrtm. eF IYamp m Br ME u,DSC.PE •RaREtt Mxdfiq W ,rE uqurpi OE nE tnx'R.0 r. urmsCr.rO wrortus wm nE CWIRRCl BIWi�wnRMHIEa FqE IYNDI:UILGRDn+,a SERSGxS FA.W 6DBSfuSIUI CWAEEA.vdfE fl .RGlS[ESNRBm Brun5mK,5Ix.CINTES puLL gtFlyFeurd LquuDmOr.s sFtwEp uyFS4OMrnv6Erpfm DIMEGMW,Gi s fF]DiNLLtuwMHOF,1a,fEMrtNwI,vIM REVEy]uq.PwO.•u BVI,E USa>,R' APE. RM1mrPRpe TTOw51wPC0.Y1mlIN.Crpl9uLL Sf4F Nr1E 6 .LE Puvf wTDBY3 51 wLL BF waip3D up wlx,ySp yr,F. MY.Epryt£ v gas. w. rwcosrroonun. uwxwFRESUrxomouwmrseFmmunarsr .cm�,:es ,B. srcEPAID n.I—PRImswE.asmFeoPo IER13 rr.RATED—mx,wnrnrs vm.ER wmc5na ssrES. Detucm FRmE uwxAPE marm]cTlw.crnmEs .,mEiRWC.SnDE]srsEEN GGSwx wiE"""GPawc'ME RmxroF�]Ar:D rRO 'Di�FEDGE�nF >.mmvDRrIC4B.cBOFFEI e.`CLA"PAe.E rroFExEarsDxF n,CNa PRECmrR ,roxPER rreFS.— TEV.eNNturmDNro ]. coxmRCraRSwusExuRE. PPRa .E Of PROROSSD iRRlurrousysrzumauomm am]EA PRDRrowsruuna. LANDSCAPE REWIREMENTS uNDSCAPEGtCUAnDxs Pmi.BEnoF mr /m Sm/ aD -till Eel EROUB TOxEAA- •RV GREATER VOR GREATER 5 B'OR GREATER 2R 3 —1 "OLE11D 16 SEE Push SCMD W £AID LANDSCAPE Pux 0 WCL Aee Dt,eAe. Int. ,r4ee:o Taco Bell 3210 EDWNdele UEtE Edina. MN 55x95 Py [hwbPed M Border Foods 985DecW1. NRM GPbeD Vevey MN 55514227 vww�wvt�]�✓" _ S= rr''^^�� LANDSCAPE —I L . W ROGR �{�p& PRaPOSm TREE C%— RRWDwD sIm -9EE VAKR . SdENAf m RE ©— DECduLNE Bouon¢ te• -JD• uA _ _ a L� 1 Ix �l SIOE ENTRY ELEVATION EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE SYMBOL AREA MANUFACTURER COLOR 1❑ MAIN BUILDING COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6122'CAMEL BACK' ❑2 WALL COLOR BEHIND SCREEN WALL SHERWIN WILLAMS SW M31 'CLEMATIS' R. ALLBRCOLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW='ROOKWOOD CLAY' 4 SLAT WALL AND VALANCE COLOR SHERWIN WILUAMS SW 7UM'STATUS BRONZE' ❑S PARAPET CAP COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7WD'IRON ORE' �8 SIMULATED MASONRY VENEER BORAL STONE PRODUCTS PROSTONE LEDGESTONE VINTAGE WIND PROJS22S4 �7 STOREFRONTWINDOWS TBD 'DARK BROK= OPIPE BOLLARDS STREET SMART YELLOW -114' THCIK PLASTIC COVER(US.POSTMAN.COM) OR EQUAL RNISK ERTERIID FlNISH SYSTEM IOEFSI DIRECTS %TERIDR FlMSH SYSTEM IDEFS) BEHIND SLAT WALL 51 -- -E FIMSHTSYSTEMI I.EFS) Q METAL SIMULATED MASONRY VENEER -Ew aPREFlMSHED METAL ARRWACW . 1ft-a TACO BELL 0210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55435 Py 1O oo'la N y,��J x "10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS TACO BELL EOI'- MN DIRECT EXTERIOR FlNMM 5Y3TEM (DE" 4 I FRONT ELEVATION a1 REAR. ELEVATION IMECT EX-1 -5K SYSTEM(DMI EEMIND SLAT WALL S-A- FlNMHTlYlTEMpDEFlI MEENAlMEO PREFlNbHED s�1MULATEo RY VENEER In EI�HI 1ETAL - WCL TACO BELL 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 550.15 _XTERIOR ELEVATION TACO MIILL D, M 0 o m � FRONT ELEVATION 2 SIDE ELEVATION o m REAR ELEVATION U or. t+v DIRECTEIITERID0. � DIRECTESTERIDR FINI9HSYSTEMIDEFS) N15H SYSTEM IOEFS) OI0.E[T ESTERIDR FlNI9N SYSTEM OEF$) (�1 SIDE ELEVATION ±0.EEAMSHEO El META NISXED [Tj IMp p RYV-- P 0.FlMSHED WCL BELL 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55435 Eiy ppt� TRASH ENCLOSURE REPORT D ® e ® ® �9L ja O�/ 1 O ,aaB MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. E. . From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 0 Discussion Date: January 21, 2014 Information ❑ -- Subject: South-dale medical-Building, 6525- France Avenue � Amend`Coditions of approval-to build! - -- the proof -of- parking plan Action Requested: Approve the revised plans Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider an amendment of the approved plans for the addition to the Southdale Medical Office Building. (See attached applicant project description and plan revisions.) The applicant proposes to build the proof of parking plan (5th level) and not build the underground parking level. The proof -of- parking would then extend the 5ti, level of the ramp toward the hospital. (See attached plans.) ATTACHMENTS: • Applicant narrative and revised plans City of Edina 4801 W. 50t1 St. Edina, MN 55424 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. January 8, 2014 Architecture Engineering Interiors Planning Cary Teague Community. Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St -. - - -- — Edina,, -.MN- 55424----- - - - - -- - - -.- Re: Revisions to Southdale Medical Office Building-Parking Ramp and Variances Dear Cary: Please be advised that the parking garage portion of the project has been revised somewhat from what was approved by the City Council in.October because of budgetary constraints. The primary change consists of eliminating the basement level and replacing it with a partial fifth level at the south end of the garage. Previously this fifth! level was considered part of the "proof of parking" that could be added in the future if needed. Proof of parking will now be an expansion of the fifth level to the north end of the parking garage along 65th Street The site plan approved by the City Council on October -1, 2013 remains unchanged. The "foot print" and overall dimensions of the parking garage remain unchanged. The revised and updated garage plan has 1,173 parking spaces compared to 1,180 in the previous scheme. The proof of parking is 162 spaces. When combined with the 397 spaces in the surface lots, the total is 1,732 spaces on site, compared to 1,715 spaces required by the zoning ordinance. The three variances originally submitted with the Site Plan Application have been revised to reflect the proposed changes to the parking ramp. The inter - related variances are as follows: 1. Fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Reduced setbacks from the lot lines. 3. Increase in building height relative to set backline locations. As noted in the City of Edina - Variance Application (page 2) the following four items are addressed. • The proposed variance will relieve some practical difficulties relative to set back and height of the parking ramp. The parking ramp needs to be expanded to five levels to meet the parking requirements. The existing three level ramp, structurally designed for vertical expansion, is at or over the setbacks for three levels. It would be difficult and costly to not add to the existing structure. 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 9� V Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 t612.332.3654 f332.3626 Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer — www .collaborativedesigngroup.com r • Adding on to the existing ramp already too close to the property line is an extraordinary circumstance unique to this property. • The proposed variances will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The new four /five level ramp will generally meet height and set back requirements along 65th Street • The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The adjacent blocks contain hospital, retail, and offices occupancies that will not be adversely affected by the granting of these variances. A revised explanation of each variance and supporting data is attached. Changes and revisions are highlighted in red. Revised images sketches showing the additional fifth level and a new fifth level floor plan are also attached. Very truly yours, Collaborative Design Group, Inc. ark Beckman Project Architect Enclosures Variance No. 1: Parking Spaces Provided Revised: January" 8, 2014 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance to provide fewer parking spaces than what is required by the Zoning Ordinance. Per: SubSection 850.08, Subd. 1, paragraph M, parking spaces shall be provided at the rate of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space for each physician or dentist. Parking Calculations and Analysis: Existing office buildings @ 273,000 sq. ft. + new office building @, 60,000 sq. ft. _ 333,000 sq. ft. gross / 200 sq. ft., = 1,665 cars + 50 physicians (estimated number on site at one time) 1,715 cars total required on site. Analysis of existing parking lot and ramp usage in June 2013.indicates that approximately, 932 spaces, or 74.3 %, of the available 1254 are being utilized at' any one time. ( See Attached Exhibit B — Existing Parking Utilization) Based on existing usage of 932 plus full requirement of 300 spaces for the new 60,000 sq. ft. office building the owner would like to propose the. initial construction of 4 level, ramp and half of the fifth accommodating 1., 173 spaces. The parking ramp plus the other 397 spaces on site would provide a total of 1,570 parking spaces on the campus. 1;570 is 91.5% of the required 1,715 parking stalls. See attached Surrey and parking ramp.plans. The north half of the fifth level of the parking ramp, accommodating 162, is proposed as "proof of parking," bringing the potential total to 1,732 spaces. See attached Exhibit C — Parking. Summary and parking ramp plans. rr rr rr Exhibit B - Parking Utilization Analysis Southdale Medical Campus Between June 11 -and 17, 201.3 a parking utilization analysis was conducted on the existing parking facilities (surface lots and `parking ramp) Numbers below indicate the parking spaces recorded as open at the times indicated. Tues 6/11 — Surface lots — 33 open, Ramp 249 open — 10 AM 75 open, 263 open — 3 PM Wed 6/12 — Surface lots — 70 open, Ramp 243 open — 10 AM 49 open, Ramp 269 open — 3 PM Thurs 6/13 Surface lots — 31 open, Ramp 250 open — 10 AM 97 open, Ramp 271 open — 3 PM Fri 6/14 Surface lots — 105 open, Ramp 279 open — 10 AM 132 open, Ramp 307 open — 3 PM Mon 6/17 Surface lots — 19 open, Ramp 224 open — 10 AM 55 open, Ramp 275 open — 3 PM After deleting the smallest and largest numbers, the average number of open spaces on site at any given time is 322. 1254 spaces on site minus 322 = 932 occupied. spaces. Exhibit C - Project Parking Count Summary Southdale Medical Campus July 26, 2013 Revised: January 8, 2014 Zoning Requirements: 1 car per 200 sq. ft. gross floor area, plus 1 car per doctor 333,000 sq. ft. gross / 200 sq. ft. = 1,665 cars + 50 physicians (estimated number on site at one. time) =,1,715 cars total Proposed. Project Parking: Existing Parking .to Remain: Surface Parking (west and north lots): 310 Lower Level- Parking (6525 Building): 75 "Courtyard" Parking: 6 Total Existing Parking: 391 New /Remodeled Parking Ramp: First Level (Grade): 178 Second Level: 285 Third Level: 292 Fourth Level: 288 Fifth Level. (south end): 130 Total Parking in Ramp: 1,173 South Surface Lot (new) 6 Total Parking Proposed: 1,570 Proof of Parking: (future, if needed) Ramp Fifth Level (north end):. 162 Total Parking 1,732 T% V1, sss s sa s Variance No. 2: Parking Ramp Setbacks Revised January 8, 2014 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance for front and side yard setbacks exceeding those allowed by the zoning ordinance. Per paragraph G of Subd 5 of SubSection 850.08 the required front and side yard setback is 20 feet plus 1 foot for each foot of height exceeding 20 feet. It is proposed that the existing parking ramp, three levels at the north end and two levels at the south end, be expanded vertically to a height of four levels at the north end and five levels at the south end (possible five levels at north end with "proof of parking "). The existing parking ramp width and structural column grid will be maintained. The existing three level ramp is already over the set back lines along 65th Street and Drew Avenue. Setback Summary Data: Building height equals the required setback. Proposed height: Four level ramp at top of parapet (north end): 34' -8" Five level ramp at top of parapet (south end): 45' -0" Proposed height: Top of "glass box" at southeast corner: 46' -6" Proposed Setbacks from property lines: Drew Avenue at 65th Street (north end of site): 20.06 ft. Drew Avenue at 66th Street (south end of site): 28.54 ft. 66th Street (south end): 34.5 ft. 65th Street (north end): 36.5 ft. J V rip, L 4! T � A Variance No. 3: Parking Ramp Height Revised: January 8, 2014 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance for building a parking ramp exceeding the heights allowed by setback criteria described the Zoning Ordinance. Per, paragraph G of Subd 5 of SubSection 850.08 the required front and side yard setback is 20 feet plus 1 foot for each foot of height exceeding 20 feet. It is proposed that the existing parking ramp,.three levels at the north end and two levels at the south end, be expanded vertically to a height of four levels at the north end and five levels at the south end (five levels at north end with "proof of parking "). The existing parking ramp'width and structural column grid alignments will be maintained and extended to the south. The existing three level ramp is already over the set back lines along 65"' Street and Drew Avenue. Setback and Height Data Summary: Setback from lot line equals the maximum building height Setbacks from lot lines: Proposed Height Drew Avenue at 65th Street (north end of site): 20.06 ft. 34' -8" @ parapet Drew Avenue at 66th Street (south end of site): 28.54 ft. 45'70" @ parapet 46' -6" @ "glass box" 66th Street: 34.5 ft. 46' -8" @ "glass box" 45' -0" @ parapet 65th Street: 36.5 ft. 34' -8" @ parapet See attached Survey (Exhibit A) and Parking Ramp Plans and Images Sketches r r r r r f { Ze `e FIFTH LEVEL PARKING PLAN cc COLLABORATM ncsignGroup,i.- ,.DC Pa Avow <SaM. SWb 100 Mirvwepd's, 4ir� 55401 N a E ca U ca v � a �m ca Lo to z >� i _ a r ++ Y d 0 Q a 40 c ui a 4o W ALAN APPROVAL JANUARY 8, 2014 MEY610M laL ts66a4p G, PARKING PLAN A205 i r saw. 4 NOM f i Southdale Medical Office Building and Parking Ramp ft- City of Edina Council Presentation "`F'- January 21, 2014 Revised Submittal Existing Parking Spaces Required Parking Spaces Based on New Office Building Proposed Parking Spaces 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Parking Statistics ,r t � r 4 � n f� IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST RAMP « �= DU ACCES EXISTING MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 6525 EXISTING MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 6545 PROPOSED MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING EXPANSION SEE DETAILED OPTIONS l RAMP PROPOSED ACCESS D NEW PARKING m RAMP C L esl 0 NORTH a 30 50 r by IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST LEGEND PUBLIC ART COD BICYCLE PARKING aBUS STOP PERVIOUS PAVERS - COLORED CONCRETE - BRICK PAVERS w BITUMINOUS CONCRETE TURF 0 DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ® PERENNIAL BED esl 0 NORTH a 30 50 r by IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST �E Af�...� ✓ �. aawr. wr.0 �s ww r i• I Za t"I -� ■��I�1� rhifIV j pre 0 Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation 03 rM ■ ■�■ ( I w.���.� -- - 21111119U, OEM— Revised Submittal of •. . M ■� Zi.rw.Tiw 'ra �■r ■■ wt w ■M mum o j tw -a. ._ _. . I __•� M M ;i �E Af�...� ✓ �. aawr. wr.0 �s ww r i• I Za t"I -� ■��I�1� rhifIV j pre 0 Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation 03 Previous Submittal - 4 Levels of Parking -1 IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST Revised Submittal - 5 Levels of Parking IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST Previous Submittal - 4 Levels of Parking Revised Submittal - 5 Levels of Parking IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST Previous Submittal - 4 Levels of Parking - - Revised Submittal - 5 Levels of Parking 1 IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST A)7 — - — - — - — - — T T 7 Y T 45'4Y T� —T i j l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I ! I I I f I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING BUILDNO 6525 117 STANOARD PARKING 13 COMPACT PARKING 130 TOTAL 1 FIFM LEHa PARKM PINT Y T T 101" 1 11111111111milill i EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING BUILDING 6545 caLABORAT1vL oesigncroup,.. cn E V Ala �!g t CID to o'!aag Win. z a RFAWN TO SM PLAN APPROVAL JANUARY 8. 2M A205 IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday December 12, 2013 7:04 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:04p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Gubrud, Heer, Howard, Kostuch, Latham, Rudnicki, Sokol, Thompson, and Chair Sierks. Absent: Bale and Risser Late Arrival: Zarrin Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Latham to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes. Member Latham added David Chin, Flora Delaney, Joeffrey Bodeau, Virginia Kearney, and Jamie Bodeau to the Local Food Task Force. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Consent Agenda with the Working Group changes. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. Reilly Anderson, Project Earth, gave an update on their Pilot Solar Power Project. Solar panels will run current to the media center to a charging station for student's phones, laptops, etc. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Grandview Advisory Update (Jimmy Bennett) Mr. Bennett gave an update, on the first property to be redeveloped in the Grandview Area, which is the old Public Works site. The Council would like to see that property become a Grandview Commons Community Area, since it's centrally located within the proposed redevelopment area. Mr. Bennett is requesting guidance from the EEC on how to include sustainability in a Request for Interest for developers and scoring ideas. Chair Sierks suggested that the EEC Members email Mr. Bennett with ideas. The RFI will be released in March. Chair Sierks excused himself from the meeting at 7:37p.m. B. Home Energy Squad Update (Stacy Boots Camp) Ms. Boots Camp, Center for Energy & Environment, gave an update on how the project is going and wanted to know what promotions the city wants to do in 2014. The EEC approved 30 Home Energy Squad visits and 75 residents participated in the $70 subsidy. There was a $2900 debt that CEE will cover. Member Zarrin arrived at 7:45p.m. Member Latham suggested promoting the Home Energy Squad at the full $100 visit. Member Zarrin suggested the next About Town article should include success stories from the residents that participated in the program. Chair Sierks arrived at 7:59p.m. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve 10 Home Energy Squad subsidized visits determined by CEE and the balance is given away at the April Forum. Motion carried unanimously. C. January meeting preparation. The January meeting will be the annual televised EEC monthly meeting. The following updates will be presented at the meeting. All PowerPoints are due on January 3rd at Noon. i. City of Edina Purchasing Policy (Scott Neal — 20min) ii. Municipal Waste and Recycling (Dianne 5min) iii. Business Recycling Task Force (Sarah Z 5min) iv. Education and Outreach Working Group (Paul, Bob, John Howard 10min) v. Energy 1. B3 (Ross 10min) 2. Home Energy Squad (Ross 5min) 3. Renewable Energy (John Heer 10min) vi. Student Initiatives 1. General (Sarah B) 2. Project Earth Solar Charging (Elana 5min) vii. Urban Forests Task Force (Dianne 5min) viii. Sustainability Task Force (Keith 5min) ix. Local Food Working Group (Dianne 5 min) Chair Sierks is requesting a paragraph on working group and task force 2013 accomplishments and proposed plan for 2014 by the February meeting to forward onto Council for review. D. Business Recycling Task Force. Member Zarrin said Hennepin County has awarded some grants. The Communications Dept. is creating promotional material on Business Recycling. E. Education and Outreach Working Group. Member Thompson said the April Forum will be held on April 291h at the South View Middle School. The theme will be, What will turn you on in 2030? by Maggie - - -- - -- Koerth- Baker, the idea is to discuss all of the energy generated by our electronic devices and how it- effects the grid. Another idea is Theater Public Policy. Member Thompson said the movie "Chasing Ice" will be held in the Council Chambers on January 10th at 7:OOp.m. F. Local Food Working Group. Member Latham said there are three Bee Keepers, one Chicken Keeper and three Commissioners on the working group. She said the Chicken Ordinance was easy to write. She said the group is having problems finding a Bee Ordinance template to use. The group is learning that Neonicotinoid have been making bees sick. Member Latham is suggesting doing education on pesticides and what to plant to attract bees instead. Member Latham excused herself from the meeting at 8:47p.m. G. Student Initiatives. Member Sokol said she helped write the grant for the Pilot Solar Power Project. Member Thompson said the Project Earth students will help plan the April event too. H. Sustainability Task Force. Member Kostuch, Member Heer and Mr. Bintner met on Dec. 6th and discussed creating a one page form on sustainability for the Capital Improvement Projects. Member Latham arrived at 8:52p.m. with cake from the Quasquicentennial. Event. The one page might include questions on what's your project, what are the environmental savings, what's the operating savings, and is this new or a replacement project. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. EEC Forum Recommendations Email. Mr. Bintner reminded Commissioners that they can't email everyone due to the Open Meeting Law. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS. No Comments. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. City projects update (Ross Bintner) i. Sanitary 1/1 report. Mr. Bintner gave an update on the City's Sanitary Sewer Inflow and Infiltration. There are two trunk pipes that will be fixed along Minnehaha Creek. ii. Promenade stormwater credit discussion. Mr. Bintner reviewed the Promenade Phase 4 project and the storm water benefit it will be creating. He compared the policy difference of having pumped infiltration across the Centennial Lakes area instead of each site as it redevelops to build its own storm water standards. Member Latham and Member Zarrin excused themselves from the meeting at 9:27p.m. If the City starts building regional systems how can we sell or distribute credits. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 9:36p.m. Motion made by Member Thompson and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, _Rebec a Foster GIS Administrator F MW ��X, MINUTES Rescheduled Televised Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Council Chambers Monday, December 9, 2013 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Moore and Members Mellom, O'Brien, Weber, Sussman, McDermott, Christiaansen, Birdman, and Brandt. Absent were members Holtan and Johnson. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member O'Brien moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Mellom seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES November 12, 2013 Member Birdman moved to approve the minutes from the November 12, 2013 meeting. Member McDermott seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. Explore the History of Your Home — Committee Report Member Weber reported that he, and Members Birdman and Moore have met several times since the November IT' HPB meeting'to discuss the goals for this project and the possible opportunities to engage Edina residents as they investigate the history of their homes. Ideas to promote the program include Facebook and Speak -Up Edina entries, as well as the possibility of having a Heritage Preservation blog. Member Moore added that the committee intends to meet on a monthly basis and will keep the board advised of their progress. On a related note, Planner Repya shared that she recently met with a gentleman who came into City Hall to research the history of his grandparents' home which his father designed in 1935. The gentleman, now in his mid -60's had a file folder full of photographs, letters and awards; and was looking to find more information on owners of the property over the years. Ms. Repya shared the photos with the board and explained that the gentleman's interest in the home is common, as evidenced by the numerous visitors to Edina's Historical Society wanting to know more about specific properties in the city. She added that the "Explore the History of Your Home" project will provide assistance to those trying to piece together the history of a home, and will also provide the current owners with a sense of what their homes used to be. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 9, 2013 B. 2013 — A Year in Review Planner Repya presented a PowerPoint presentation outlining the following activities of the. HPB during 2013: • 8 Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) applications approved in the Country Club District; 4 COA's for new detached garages; and 4 for changes to street facing facades. • A COA was approved for the historic Baird House, 4400 W. 50`h Street for replacement of the outbuilding on the northwest corner of the property. • COA projects completed: Photos were provide of five projects which were completed. • 2013 . Heritage Award Recipient — Southdale Center recognized.for renovations to the mall which were true to the original mid- century architectural style. • Summer Tour — In July the HPB toured the West Minneapolis Heights area of the Presidents Neighborhood. • Completed the "Suburban Development in Edina since 1935 Historic Context Study which will establish a framework for studying the Post WWII development in Edina and identify areas of interest. Board members thanked Ms. Repya for the report, agreeing that it had been an eventful year. C. 2014 — Proposed Work Plan Chair Moore provided an overview of the proposed 2014 work plan that has been presented to the City Council for their approval. In addition to the recurring business of the board to include the review of COA applications, the annual heritage award presentation, and the summer tour, the board has identified the following potential initiatives: • Create a Heritage Resource Disaster Management Plan • West Minneapolis Heights. survey for preservation potential • Identify properties for potential heritage landmark status • Designate Wooddale Bridge an Edina Heritage Landmark 9 Update the Heritage Resource Inventory and convert it to an electronic- format. VII. OTHER BUSINESS - None VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS • Letter from LHB Corp. to City Engineer Wayne Houle regarding an opportunity for Wooddale Bridge to be included with other historic bridges in an application for National Register designation. Ms. Repya added that the Nat. Reg. designation will be a perfect segway to the board's desire to locally designate the bridge an Edina Heritage Landmark. • An email from Edina Historical Society's Executive Director, Marci Matson regarding a possible partnership with the Oliver Hudson Kelley Grange to provide historic interpretation at the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes December 9, 2013 Minnehaha Grange in trade for allowing them to use the Minnehaha Grange for monthly meetings. Board members agreed that was an excellent idea. IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member O'Brien observed that on the 2014 Meeting Schedule which the board received indicated that the August and November meetings are scheduled for the second Monday of the month, and he was wondering why they weren't planned for Tuesday. Planner Repya explained that the second Tuesday of August is the primary election day when no public meetings can take place until the polls close at 8:00 pm; and the second Tuesday in November is Veteran's Day. Mr. O'Brien thanked Ms. Repya for the clarification. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Repya reminded the board that the Founders Day festivities are coming up on Thursday, December 12th. Starting at 5:00 pm with an open house at the Cahill School /Grange Hall, the festivities then move across.the street to City Hall for a program and social hour, wrapping up at 8:00 pm. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE January 14, 2014 XI1. ADJOURNMENT 7:40 p.m. Member Birdman moved for adjournment at 7:40 p.m. Member O'Brien seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL November 12, 2013 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Jacobson, Jones, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Student Members present: Good, Johnson. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Jones added to the agenda a Living Streets Working Group update. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Steel, to add the Living Streets Working Group update to the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Jacobson, Jones, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Motion carried. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Peterson, to approve the revised meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Jacobson, Jones, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Cella made a motion, seconded by Member Jones, approving the consent agenda as follows: W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of October 8, 2013 Ayes: Members Jacobson, Jones, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Centennial Lakes Promenade Phase 4 Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer, provided a presentation on Phase 4 of the Promenade and asked for input from the Park Board as well as a resolution in support of the project. He highlighted the water feature and art, as well as the babbling brook. He noted that there have not been any changes to the plans since it was last presented to the Park Board. Member Jones noted the potential problem of intermingling pedestrians with bicyclists. Mr. Bintner noted the Three Rivers Park District will be, addressing that in the next couple of years. 1 In response to a question about maintenance costs, Mr. Bintner indicated those have not been written down specifically. Ms. Kattreh added she has not seen any expenses, but throughout this entire design, maintenance was taken into consideration, and staff looked for maintenance -free designs. Member Gieseke asked about the future water feature on the southern area. Mr. Bintner indicated it is on the Macy's site, should a potential redevelopment occur there. It is an opportunity because of stormwater. When Macy's redevelops, it will have to provide flood protection. Member Gieseke asked about plans for art on the island. Mr. Bintner noted there are some manholes on that island. Member Segreto asked about the proposed sound system. Mr. Bintner- responded there is a sound system on Centennial Lakes to provide music on the trails; one idea is to extend that north into this area. The direction right now, however, is not to include the continuation due to maintenance challenges. Members Jones and Segreto agreed with that decision. Mr. Bintner noted the Energy and Environment Commission's main concerns were energy costs. Member Jones asked for clarification about the source of water in the babbling brook and the foundation. Mr. Bintner responded it will be pumping water up through Centennial Lakes and circulating it through the system, and that it is designed for passive enjoyment of the brook rather than an active participation by children getting feet wet, etc. Member Jones stated the babbling brook is unnecessary and environmentally it is a problem, considering the water tables are running low. Mr. Bintner provided more detail on the environmental aspects of the proposal, noting this aspect augments the ability of Centennial Lakes to provide flood protection. He noted four alternative design options were reviewed that promoted the infiltration of water and promoting the use of water in the landscape. The Watershed District chose the shallow surface infiltration feature and the rock channel. Mr. Bintner noted this project could then provide a bank of credits with the Watershed District to use against future redevelopment projects. Member Jones asked for further clarification on the water. Mr. Bintner clarified the two different reports cover the water feature with the parks function, and the other is an underground water feature with a stormwater function. Member Peterson commented on the parking challenge; he also asked about any proposed restaurants in this area, as well as accommodations for dog walkers. Chair Steel added it would be nice to have a place to lockup bikes. Member Jones asked about the lake runoff that goes into the creek. Mr. Bintner stated any water runoff during rain will cause the water in Centennial Lakes to rise and go into the creek. Member Jones asked about budgeting for maintenance costs. Ms. Kattreh responded that has not been discussed yet. What is being considered is a maintenance district for this entire area. 2 Mr. Bintner discussed the next steps: the proposal goes before the Council, then the Watershed District, then the design process completion in March, the bidding process, with potential construction from June to October. Member Jones asked for this trail to meet more generational needs, from the very young to the very old. The design is not capturing young families, and it is an extravagance. She commented there are not many trees, and she hopes for more landscaping in the final plan. ' Member Segreto commented this project is mainly about watershed protection, rather than about playground or park issues. The phases of Centennial Lakes were in the master plan, and she does not want to dismantle what has been done. Member Deeds suggested splitting out the water feature from the total budget price so the expenses can be more easily understood. Member Jones asked about possible heaving in the trails and the costs associated with those repairs. Mr. Bintner responded there are some mitigating factors against the potential damage. There are six to eight inches of aggregate under the trail; there are 12 inches of topsoil nearby; and the edges are hardened. He suspects the stormwater fund would be used for surface repairs. Member Jones indicated she will not be supporting the concept for all the concerns and reasons she previously mentioned. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to support the concept plan. Ayes: Members Jacobson, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Nay: Member Jones. Motion carried. VI.B. Yorktown Community Garden Status Kristin Aarsvold, Recreation Supervisor, provided a timeline of the community garden, noting the plots were sold out within eight days of City Council approval of the gardens. Sandy Radeke, Edina resident and a renter of the community garden, noted the weather was not helpful this past year, but the staff helped with the garden and brought in additional soil. She also highlighted the social benefits of the garden. Ms. Aarsvold highlighted the two major improvements for 2014: improved soil conditions and a permanent water source. Additionally, an Eagle Scout will be adding some raised beds in the corner where the drain is. She noted there will be a round table this month with 15 other cities with community gardens. She also noted an advisory committee, made up of plot renters, has been formed, with the first meeting to beheld on December 11. Member Cella asked about priority registration. Ms. Aarsvold responded that issue will be brought up at the advisory committee meetings. There are five plot renters who will not be coming back; there is a waiting list of 43, the majority of whom are Edina residents. Member Segreto asked about the parking lot. Ms. Aarsvold responded it was completed the end of August. There were more complaints about rabbits than difficulty in parking. Member Deeds asked about a rotation policy so that some plots will turn over to allow new renters. 3 Member Peterson noted things can be grown in a hay bale; once it is watered, it creates heat and things grow really well. It would work really well for kids. He also suggested putting in a second plot at the same park, to accommodate more renters. I Member Jones asked about signage on York. Ms. Aarsvold responded she previously met with Hennepin County to discuss signage, and they would not grant a sigh,at this point in time due to the amount of existing signs. Member Jones suggested asking the YMCA,to move their sign to the other side of the driveway, to allow for space for the,garden. Ms. Aarsvold responded she will make that request. Ms. Kattreh commented that staff will be watching how quickly the gardens fill up.this year, and will look at the opportunity to expand the gardens to the west in 2015. A motion was made by Member Segreto, seconded by Member Jones, to approve Yorktown Park Community Garden Center as a permanent park amenity. Ayes: Members Jacobson, Jones, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Motion carried. VI.C. Bike Edina Task Force Representative Ms. Kattreh asked for a volunteer to serve on the Task Force, as Member Jones, who has served for three years, is stepping down. Chair Steel asked the Board Members to contact Ms. Kattreh should anyone become interested. VI.D. Living Streets Policy Update Member Jones reported she is serving on a working group that will be implementing the new City Living Streets Policy. One of the very first items of business was the city's contracting with a marketing consultant to develop a brand. Two brands were developed, and Member Jones asked for feedback from the board. Chair Steel asked why a branding/marketing campaign is needed and inquired about the difference between a "complete street" and a "living street." Member Jones responded she is new to the committee and cannot answer the question, as she is passing along information as she receives it. Member Segreto commented on the font size and colors of one of the first brand choice and suggested simplifying the graphics. She also asked about simply using the city's logo. Chair Segreto suggested efforts be spent in branding the City of Edina instead, perhaps focusing on healthy choices rather than just focusing on the streets. Member Peterson noted sidewalks do a lot to enhance neighborhoods and healthy choices. He suggested the city focus efforts on sidewalks, as well as how to pay for them. Ms. Kattreh noted that the Pedestrian and Cycling Safety Fund now pay for sidewalks. Members Cella and Segreto offered feedback on both of the proposed logos, suggesting perhaps a combination of both. Member Deeds stated the city needs to think clearly about this issue of branding, as it already has multiple logos. 4 Vll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VII.A. Council Updates None. VII.B. Founders Day Celebration Invitation Ms. Kattreh noted the celebration will be December 12, 2013, and the Park Board and all community members are invited to City Hall. Vlll. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Jones noted the Bike Edina Task Force is hosting a listening session on November 14, 2013, on the Hennepin County Bike transportation plan at Edina City Hall. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh made the following comments: the Golf Dome's grand opening is this weekend with plenty of activities going on; on October 14, the City Council approved the plans for the construction of the Sports Dome and rink project, and surveys are underway. X. ADJOURNMENT Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 p.m. Ayes: Members Jacobson, Jones, Cella, Gieseke, Segreto, Steel, Deeds, Peterson. Motion Carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:46 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS DECEMBER 11, 2013 I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL- Answering Roll Call: Scherer, Schroeder, Potts Fischer, Kilberg, Halva, Carr, Platteter, Forrest Grabiel, Staunton III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Grabiel moved approval of the December 11, 2013 meeting agenda. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Carr moved approval of the November 11, 2013, meeting minutes. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed.during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. No public comment. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Cindy Larson — Residential Redevelopment Coordinator Coordinator Larson addressed the Commission and delivered a power point presentation highlighting her observations to date of the City's redevelopment process. Larson said topics covered will include common concerns heard from residents and the remedies presently used to address these concerns. Page 1 of 8 Larson highlighted the following: Common Concerns: • Parking issues • Erosion concerns (tracking into street) • Encroachment disputes (property lines, fences, trees, etc.) • Drainage /impervious surface coverage questions • Noise levels • Safety concerns (site protection, foundation fencing) • Construction hour questions and complaints • Tree removal • Miscellaneous general questions (new, remodel, addition) Current Remedies: • Work with builders on code compliance • Parking restrictions • Working in conjunction w /multiple city departments to respond to questions • Coordination of meetings between builders and residents • Stop Work Orders, escrow funds, citations Effective Policies • Site Signage • Neighborhood Meeting — provides opportunity for residents to ask questions • Pre - demolition site inspection • Cash Escrow • Parking Issues — communication with builders and police Next Steps o Enforcement protocol (Code section 1040 vs. 411; specific violation remedy guidelines) • Dust control policy (demolitions) • Website presence for redevelopment • Critical topic handouts (with demo and building permits) o Work sessions to discuss code clarifications. Larson stood for questions. Chair Staunton thanked Coordinator Larson for her presentation and commented that in his opinion enforcement is very important to ensure 411 functions as it should. Commissioner Platteter asked Larson how she thinks the residents are "doing with the new ordinance ". Larson responded that rolling out the new ordinance and her position has definitely had a learning curve. She further reported that many residents and builders are very proactive; however, as things proceed everyone becomes aware of differing issues. She also pointed out new policies are continually being "rolled out" to help clarify the process. Platteter also suggested that the City create a map that identifies the areas /neighborhoods where "things are going on ". This map could also be web based so Page 2 of 8 residents can see what's been happening. Planner Teague responded the map is an option to consider; possibly by year. Commissioner Potts asked Larson if she knows the percent of time she spends on specific issues. Larson responded that varies each day, adding she also tries to spend much of her time being proactive. Potts questioned if Larson found neighbors reporting property damage as the result of new. construction. Larson responded to date there have been some issues; such as sprinkler heads being broken, etc.; however, they were addressed and resolved. Larson further explained that she acts as a mediator between owner, neighbors and City when something goes awry; reiterating for the most part issues have been addressed and settled. Continuing, Potts asked Larson if she ever "sat down" with builder(s) and neighbor(s). Larson responded that "in the field" she has met with the builder, owner, and neighbors. Commissioner Forrest commented that in her opinion there are remodels that are so extreme they should be considered teardown /rebuilds and asked Larson if she ever intercedes for neighbors if problems arise with remodels. Larson responded in the affirmative. She clarified that although she enforces 411 she regularly receives inquiries from residents regarding additions. Larson said she tries to be "one stop" and gather the proper information for the neighbor and report back to that neighbor what she finds. Commissioner Forrest noted the discrepancy in "noise" requirements between City ordinances and asked Larson why there is a discrepancy. Larson explained that teardown /rebuild construction hours. are more limited in 41 1(new home construction). The differing ordinances allow residents to work on home "projects" (roofs, decks, additions) over the weekends and until 9 pm during summer months. Commissioner Forrest asked Larson her overall feeling of success. Larson responded that City staff continues to study and improve 411. Larson said one very large issue is parking. Larson explained when she receives parking complaints she visits the site and if she finds a violation she needs to work with the Edina Police Department. Larson said enforcement may proceed more smoothly in this area if she could write parking citations. Planner Teague reported that the City Attorney is working on drafting an amendment to the ordinance that would grant the residential redevelopment coordinator the authority to write parking citations. Chair Staunton asked if there have been reported drainage issues in context with newer larger buildings being built on small lots; and if so, how is it handled. Larson responded that all new house plans are reviewed by both the Planning Division and Engineering Department. Each has to sign off on the plans before construction can commence. Continuing, Staunton asked how the City is "sure" the house is built according to plans. Larson replied that the City requires a final -as built and the final as -built is what is actually built. She acknowledged there can be changes during the construction process; however, the final as -built is what the City signs off on. Commissioner Potts stated in his opinion there needs to be a policy in place that better addresses drainage and volume control. Commissioner Carr agreed, she stated drainage issues need careful attention. Planner Teague told the Commission he believes a work session is scheduled with the Council on 411 sometime in February. Commissioners can attend. Page 3 of 8 Commissioner Platteter said he wants to ensure that any drainage issues are resolved sooner than later. Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Forrest commented that she continues to be troubled by the differing construction hours "noise" found in the Code, adding she understands the reasoning is to allow residents to work on their. homes; however, believes it needs to be applied evenly. Chair Staunton asked Larson if there is a "close -out" process. Coordinator Larson responded with regard to 411 that every project will be closed out by her. Staunton said he believes the residential redevelopment coordinator in a very important position, adding it appears to be the glue between departments. Commissioner Carr thanked Coordinator Larson for her appearance suggesting there be a way to communicate to residents "what's going on" with regard to redevelopment. Larson agreed, adding she is working with the Communication Division on further establishing a web site addressing this topic. Chair Staunton thanked Coordinator Larson for her work and presentation. B. Sketch Plan - Pentagon Office Park Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission at their last meeting they considered a sketch plan for Pentagon Office Park, adding the development team is again before the Commission asking for their comments on a continuation of the sketch plan. Teague explained that the total site area is roughly 43 acres in size and its redevelopment would likely occur over the next 2 -15 years. After sketch plan review by the Planning Commission and City Council, the applicant has indicated they will follow up with a formal application to rezone the site to PUD, Planned Unit Development. This request would allow greater flexibility in land uses, amenities, setbacks, pedestrian, connection, and depending on the future use of Fred Richards Golf Course, the potential for greater connection and integration in public space. Commissioner Potts noted that a traffic study was completed in 2008 and asked Planner Teague if the City would require an updated traffic study. Teague responded in the affirmative. Teague explained that the next step would be to reexamine traffic volume and patterns in the area. He added the City would also have a traffic consultant on board to address traffic. Applicant Presentation Scott Takenoff addressed the Commission and explained they will proceed with the redevelopment of the site through the PUD rezoning process. Takenoff said that in his opinion the PUD allows for more flexibility. Takenoff said their goal is to make formal application to, the City by the end of March 2014. Takenoff introduced Tom Whitlock and Bob Close to address the plans. Continuing, Takenoff explained that the City continues to discuss options for the Fred Richards Golf Course, adding that in a sense this development proposal needs to be considered independently from Page 4 of 8 Fred Richards. Takenoff stated the development team would prefer integration between the public and private space but much depends on what the City envisions for the Fred Richards Golf. Course. Continuing, Takenoff said an architectural group has not been retained. He added the formal application would contain architectural details. Concluding, Takenoff stated in his opinion great architecture comes from great land use. uestions /Comments Commissioner Fischer noted when they last met a final decision hadn't been made on the rezoning and thanked the applicant for making their decision by choosing the flexibility found in.the PUD rezoning process. Mr. Takenoff responded the development team wants to make sure they are following the right protocols to achieve the best redevelopment for the site. Mr. Close delivered a power point presentation and highlighted for the Commission the two different options. Close said the options are more defined from the previous multiple options and the development team plans on presenting a formal preliminary rezoning application sometime before March 2014. Close highlighted the options as follows: Option • Minimalist concept • Improve West 77th Street — project envisions a pedestrian friendly West 77th Street • Crate as much green space as possible — it is proven that green space slows traffic • No connection through Walsh Title Option 2: • Larger vision concept • Repurpose Fred Richards with parkway on the south side • Additional overpass • Keep in mind the option of linking with the new trails Commissioner Potts noted that in Option I there is no underpass. Mr. Takenoff responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Grabiel recalled when this proposal was before the Commission in 2008 there was much discussion on building height; especially the height on the "tower" site. Grabiel asked if there had been any discussion on' building height on this specific site. Mr. Takenoff responded they have had numerous discussions on building height for the "tower" site and believe at this time height would be between eight and nine stories; and meet ordinance; however a final decision on height hasn't been reached. Commissioner Carr asked if building height meets Code. Planner Teague responded that at this time the proposed height meets both the ordinance and comprehensive plan requirements. Carr questioned if they wanted to exceed building height would that require an amendment. Teague responded that a Comprehensive Plan amendment would be required to go taller and variances folded into the PUD rezoning. Page 5 of 8 Mr. Takenoff noted,the difference between Option I and Option 2, reiterating much depends on what occurs with the Fred Richards Golf Course. He added what's missing is the City's time frame on what they envision for "Fred Richards" in the future. Takenoff acknowledged the importance of integrating the Fred Richards Golf Course; however, it's the one thing the development team doesn't have control over. Chair Staunton said if he "reads" option .2 correctly -that. may not work if the golf course remains as is. Takenoff, responded that could be.true; however alternatives are needed and there will time to integrate the infrastructure after that decision is made. Takenoff said what they are focusing on now is the land use. Commissioner Forrest said in her opinion it's good to maintain flexibility; however, the options presented are so sparse it's difficult to comment. Continuing, Forrest said she would love to see more detail on how West 77th Street addresses the street. She said in her opinion it may be an area to develop neighborhood nodes. Continuing, Forrest asked the development team where their parking numbers came from. Mr. Takenoff responded that the parking numbers are from the current zoning ordinance. Takenoff said that as time goes on and more is found out about Fred Richards they can be more creative with building, parking and greenspace. Commissioner Potts said he wouldn't be adverse to increasing commercial density, adding the traffic study supports it. Continuing, Potts stated he wants the development team to focus on implementing green streets and creating a more residential setting even though it may end up being a commercial /office streetscape. Potts acknowledged parts of the Pentagon Office Park are blighted and innovative tweaks need to be made; however, he continues to feel the development is "off' without a housing element. Mr. Takenoff said that while housing is not a viable option at present time there is the potential it could appear in the future. Takenoff noted that is the reason for the PUD rezoning request; it provides more flexibility in development. Continuing, Takenoff said with regard to the "tower site" it is very critical what the infrastructure will support, adding they want to ensure the hotel built will be high quality. Concluding, Takenoff reminded the Commission this redevelopment will have many phases stretching out over many years, adding their intent is to redevelop the south west corner first with an office /hotel use. Concluding, Takenoff acknowledged that much of this is conceptual, adding as time goes on it is very possible "things" will change. Mr. Close commented that at his time so much is not known, adding much depends on the market. Commissioner Schroeder said the sketch plan approach is correct; however, he said he has difficulty with the limited architectural details that were provided. Schroeder said in his opinion how the site, buildings, building height, street, street scape relate to each other identifies the character of the area; framing a great development. Schroeder said he would like to see further study done on building height and uses on the first floor. Schroeder pointed out that building height is more than stories. Continuing, he added careful attention also needs to be paid to the street and the lack of sidewalks. Schroeder said that he believes the project is on the right track and he's supportive of the general concept; however, needs the next level of detail. Concluding, Schroeder said it is extremely important to see how the development is framed, the way the buildings relate to each other and to the streetscape and green ways. Mr. Takenoff responded that the development team wants to "get to the next step "; however, as mentioned by Mr. Close much is market driven. Schroeder questioned if that means the Commission and Council can expect to go through another sketch plan review process. Planner Teague interjected Page 6 of 8 that he believes the next step would be preliminary PUD rezoning approval and if approved the development team would bring forward a sketch. plan for final PUD rezoning. Commissioner Forrest stated she wants to ensure that this area stays vibrant, adding the development concept should also be carefully crafted to "look into the future ". She further added in her opinion that housing would be an important element in keeping this area vibrant. Chair Staunton said he understands that this process is two steps; however, the Commission needs to know the "uses" and if the "uses "'are appropriate and "doable ": Staunton said he wants to ensure continued flexibility; however, it is very important that for the "second step" that the "uses" and scale of the project are very clear. Planner Teague stated he agrees with that statement. The discussion continued on TIF funding acknowledging that the impact of what the City decides for the Fred Richards Golf Course is an important factor. Commissioners expressed the desire for this area to be interconnected keeping in mind the regional trail system to the west and Richfield. The discussion focused on building height especially on the "tower site" with Commissioners expressing the opinion that before they act they need to have the specifics on building height for the hotel. The height needs to. be framed to ensure compliance with both the ordinance and comprehensive plan. It was further acknowledged that the PUD rezoning creates a venue to address any discrepancies. Commissioner Potts stated that in his opinion as previously mentioned by Commissioner Schroeder that it is very important to know how land use and the infrastructure relate to each other and what lies between. Commissioner Carr agreed that more detail is required and asked the development team if they plan on providing more detail. Mr. Takenoff responded in the affirmative. He explained that it is their intent to formally apply for preliminary PUD approval sometime in early 2014, adding at that time more detail would be depicted on the plans; however the detail could be site specific. The discussion ensued on the preliminary nature of the plans with Commissioners acknowledging that in order to make an educated decision they need more detailed plans. Commissioners stated they understand that "sketch plan" is "sketch plan "; however, want more detail for the next go round. Mr. Takenoff commented that their company policy is "don't over promise or under deliver ", adding he believes their formal request for preliminary PUD rezoning is consistent with a multiphase redevelopment project. Takenoff said their goal is to redevelop this very important site to its fullest potential. He did acknowledge that the redevelopment would be in phases over a number of years; however, he believes time is a friend. Concluding, Takenoff reiterated the importance of this site and their intent to redevelop it to its fullest potential. Chair Staunton thanked the development team for their presentation, adding he looks forward to preliminary application. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. Page 7 of 8 VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioners Platteter and Carr said they are continuing their work with "Living Streets" and drafting a tree preservation ordinance. Carr stated they hope to discuss the tree ordinance sometime in January. Commissioner Fischer reported that the Grandview Committee continues to meet twice monthly. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that at this time the City Code in undergoing recodification, adding that should be completed before the first of the year. Teague apprised the Commission that the City Council denied the request to subdivide the property at 5612 Tracy Avenue. Teague commented that the Commission may need to "check in" with the Comprehensive Plan to ensure it continues to be "up to date ", pointing out the changes with the SWLR. Teague also noted that staff has been discussing incorporating affordable housing into the PUD process. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fischer moved adjournment. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn at 9:30 pm carried. ,gackte j:goo_genakket Respectfully. submitted Page 8 of 8 Edina Arts and Culture Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Community Room October 24, 2013 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Vice Chair Raeuchle called the meeting to order at 4:36 p.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray.Meifert, Kitty O'Dea, Colin Nelson, Paul Peterson, and Thomas Raeuchle. Commissioners Absent: Hafed Bouassida, John Swon. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. Students Representatives Present: Sophia Munic, Jack Ready. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda The agenda was approved as distributed. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of September 26, 2013 B. Edina Film Festival Report C. Edina Public Art Committee Report D. Music in Edina Group Report E. Art Center General Manager Monthly Report — October 2013 Vice Chair Raeuchle asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 26, 2013. No changes voiced. The Consent Agenda was approved.as presented. Commissioner La Valleur clarified that the September meeting minutes should reflect that the Fairview Southdale Hospital will have public art both inside and outside. V. Community Comment No comments made. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Arts and Culture Commission Working Groups Vice Chair Raeuchle reported on a meeting held between Commissioner Bouassida, Mr. Frey, and himself wherein working groups were discussed. Also discussed was the absence of a budget available to the Arts and Cultural Commission, per the City Council's decision to not fund any new initiatives. Vice Chair Raeuchle noted the purpose of the ACC is'to act in an advisory role to the City on all things cultural — parks, facilities, events and policy. However, right now the ACC is not at the table with discussions in the City related to cultural things — such as the Grandview Citizen Advisory Team and with regard to the Living Streets policy and the group dealing with park enhancements. Vice Chair Raeuchle led a discussion about how to make the Commission function without any budget. Commissioner La Valleur noted that Bill McCabe is attending the Living Streets meetings, and added that she herself is presenting the Commission when she is attending various meetings. It.was suggested one or two Commissioners attend key board and commission meetings within the City and make presentations. Vice Chair Raeuchle restated the Council has expressed full support for the Commission, but there is simply no money .vailable. Commissioner Nelson noted he ran two music festivals in Rosland Park many years ago, with only $200. Commissioner Peterson concurred with the idea of moving ahead, but noted it is challenging to gather information needed about some of the hard costs like custodial fees and the Showmobile. Vice Chair Raeuchle stated the goal is to create a culture where people want to call the Art Center for needs. He suggested the Commission create a strategic planning committee. Commissioner Meifert made a motion, seconded by Commissioner La Valleur, creating a strategic planning committee, with the goal of developing an arts and culture strategy, to be completed by February 2014. Ayes: Ellis, Lappin, La Valleur, Meifert, Nelson, O'Dea, Peterson, and Raeuchle. Motion carried. Commissioner Meifert agreed to chair the committee. Vice Chair Raeuchle brought up the idea of a cultural seed fund to help finance various cultural efforts. He highlighted some examples of cultural entrepreneurship, such as the Film Festival and the Public Art Committee, as well as other initiatives with more ambiguous status in the community. It was noted the Film Festival has been financially independent from its inception. Commissioner Nelson asked about the seed money. The Commission discussed the role of the Edina Community Foundation as the mechanism to be used, since it receives tax - deductible donations, and could keep the money raised in an account. Commissioner Nelson suggested research be done regarding whether it is possible to raise money, since the ACC is an advisory committee. Commissioner La Valleur noted the City has funded the Edina Public Art Committee, but the Council has encouraged_ EPAC to become more entrepreneurial. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Vice Chair Raeuchle asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None was voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Commissioner Comments Commissioner Peterson provided an update on the Music in Edina working group, which met last night with 13 in attendance. The next meeting will be December 4th. He put forth his ideas for music in the parks. He indicated he is proposing a winter concert, and there was good support for it; however, the challenge is the lack of funding. Mr. Frey indicated the Film Festival is working incredibly hard, and all the proceeds are given to the Edina Art Center. One possibility, to be approved by the Film Festival. Committee, is to use EFF proceeds as seed money for newer ventures that need money. Frey stated as much as $3,000 from last year that could possibly be used towards start-up costs. Commissioner O'Dea suggested approaching the School District to do a 50/50 partnership, where there is no upfront charge and the profits are split down the middle. The Commission discussed how best to create a budget. Ms. Ellis noted there is a mailing that is distributed through Community Ed that could possibly promote the concert. The Commission urged Commissioner Peterson to move forward without a budget for the winter concert. The Commission discussed generating revenue from a winter concert, and figuring out how to bring it back to the seed fund for the ACC. "ommissioner La Valleur passed around the Fairview Southdale Emergency Center conceptual site plan for public art. „ommissioner La Valleur also noted a check will be presented on November 1st to Heidi Hoy for Spaulding. At the November 4th City Council meeting, the sculpture will be officially presented to the City. She would appreciate having some. Commissioners at that meeting. Commissioner O'Dea highlighted the film festival coming upon November 7, 8, and 9th and encouraged Commissioners to attend at the Landmark Cinema at 50h and France. IX. Staff Comments Ar. Frey noted that at the last Council meeting, the Council emphasized not funding any new ventures, though there may still be some hope for Music in Edina funding. X. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by the'Vice Chair at 5:58 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION October 22, 2013 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bigbee called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. Manager Neal gave a special presentation regarding follow -up from the Southview Middle School vandalism incident. The School Superintendent would like to attend an upcoming meeting of the HRRC. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Arseneault, Bigbee, Cashmore, Haeg, Harrington, Lagerstrom, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick and Staff Liaison Schaefer. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the meeting agenda of the October 22, 2013 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Seidman. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Stanton to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of September 24, 2013; the motion was seconded by Commissioner Winnick. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT There were no community comments. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Appoint Community Outreach Working Group Members Commissioners Davis and Cashmore reviewed applications for individuals to serve on the working group. They determined that four individuals would be needed for the working group in addition to themselves, and a representative from both the Edina Police Department and Edina school District. Seven people applied for the working group. Point of Information: There is not an internal process for notification of acceptance /declination of applicants. Staff will send out letters to applicants that were not selected. Those individuals may have an opportunity to serve on another group. Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore to appoint the following individuals to the Community Outreach Working Group: Ann Meagher, Rick Kruger, Eric Holm, and Judith Rogers; and the following individuals as alternates: Katie Mehan, Agnes Yu, and Polly Bowles. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Stanton. Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission Agenda Page 2 Motion carried. B. Human Rights Symposium December 5, 2013 Chair Bigbee, Commissioner Davis, and Commissioner Cashmore are interested in attending the conference on. behalf of the Commission. Commissioner Winnick will be an alternate. C. Human Services Task Force Update Commissioner Arseneault provided an update that the Human Services Task Force had met twice and reviewed the 10 proposals submitted for funding. There were two new proposals this year from Prism Express and New America Academy; neither was recommended for funding. Prism's services were halted after they submitted the request for funding due to staffing change and New America Academy's program could not be funded by Human Services funding due to statute requirements. Cornerstone, Normadale Center, Oasis for Youth, Senior Community Services, VEAP, The Bridge, Conflict Resolution Center, and Store to Door were being recommended for funding. The total budget was $84,600. A member from each board and commission was on the task force. The recommendations will be given to the City Council on November 4 th . D. Finalize plan and presentation for November annual televised meeting Commissioners provided updates and revisions to the powerpoint for the November Annual Televised Meeting. Staff will make changes and send out to the commission for final review. Commissioner Winnick and Chair Bigbee requested that they following comments be included in the minutes: Commissioner Cashmore questioned whether 'disability' was the correct verb to use to describe the awareness event because 'disability' is now seen as a bad word. Disabled people are abled in different ways. Prepare process for the Tom Oye Award for 2014 Commissioner Winnick met with Communications Staff and discussed a press release and plan. Information will be available on the website. F. General Work Plan Updates Days of Remembrance 2014 Commissioner Seidman provided an update on the three events. A readers' theater play called 'Upstanders: Ten Who Dared "; a performance of resistance music from the Holocaust and the story of Sophie Scholl and the White Rose, a youth resistance movement in Nazi Germany will be performed at the Edina Senior Center. Ellen Kennedy is working with our commission to coordinate the interactive play, stories and music for the event. The entire event will last approximately 90 minutes. An additional video will be run on Channel 16. The Mayor needs to be confirmed to provide an address. Monitoring Domestic Partner Legislation and the City Ordinance No update. iii. Community Outreach Efforts - Focus on the initiatives and discuss evident /emerging issues in the community ;i Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission Agenda Page 3' Update provided earlier in the meeting. iv. Ctuasquicentennial Commissioner Lagerstrom updated the committee that the group hopes to have their document in the hands of the Communication Department by November St v. Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan Update:lprovided at the.beginning of the meeting. vi. Disability Awareness Campaign No update. vii. 2,014 Anti - Bullying Event Commissioner Lagerstrom has been working with the Edina Reads group and they have moved the event to the Fireside Room in the Senior Center. Books will be purchased at a 42% discount. Nancy Carlson's fee will be $400. Edina Reads may be able to provide the refreshments. The Friends of the Edina Library can sell additional books at the event. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Chair. Bigbee reported that the Living Streets Advisory Group needs activity photos of intergenerational groups. Any photos should be sent to Mark Nolan in the Engineering Department. Commissioner Stanton questioned if the City Council has taken up the Immigration Reform issue. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Schaefer reported that Councilmember Bennett sent a letter of invitation to Founders Day events. In addition, she reported that Ari Klugman recently accepted as position as the City Administrator of Madison Lake, MN. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, the meeting was adjourned. Chair Bigbee declared the meeting adjourned at 9:20 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, November 26, 2013 Annie Johnson, HRRC Staff Liaison Arnie Bigbee, HRRC Chair p T / ' : COO MMENDATI©N To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: January 21, 2014 Subject: Correspondence received after packets Action Requested: . No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. Ow N moo. Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 I , Deb Mangen From: Tom Fletcher <tfletcher @aexcom.com> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 10:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: West 77th Street TO: Edina Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Josh Sprague Council Member Ann Swenson Community Development Director Cary Teague Interim Engineering Director Chad Millner My company owns the office building at 4445 West 77th Street, which is across from the Pentagon Office Park and I also have my office in the building. We purchased the building in 2003 and have proactively maintained the building since that time with consistent 95% plus occupancy with a wide variety of successful tenants. I have watched incredulously from across the street as the previous Pentagon Park owners / managers did their best to encourage good tenants to leave their buildings. Based on my observations working in Hillcrest Development's Minneapolis buildings as a communications contractor, it is my strong belief that Hillcrest's purchase, management, and redevelopment of Pentagon Park will be positive for our area. They are a very competent company with'a long term focus. That being said, I was rather surprised to read about plans for West 77th Street in this week's Sun Current and then observe the January 7 Edina City Council meeting on the internet. It appears that there have been significant discussions of options and plans for West 77th Street with no notice or opportunity for inclusion being provided to property owners such as my company on the south side of the street. Our neighbor Neil Peterson at 4455 West 77tH Street has also verified that he was not aware of these discussions until I called him last Friday. My understanding is that there was a community presentation or meeting, which we were not notified of or invited to. I am a City Council Member in Greenwood and a strong believer in public participation in planning and development processes and would have certainly have participated in meetings and discussions had I been aware of them. I would hope that our history and experience on West 77th Street would be helpful in the redevelopment process. I would request that Neil and myself be notified of and included in discussions of redevelopment of West 77th Street and our area. We will also be reaching out to you to set up meetings to discuss options for West 77th Street and our area. Items which one or both of us would like to discuss include: -Storm water issues on 77th Street. - Inclusion of some or all of the properties on the south side of 77th Street in the proposed TIF district. - Connection of the properties on the south side of 77th Street to the proposed Nine Mile Creek Trail and Parks. - Potential building heights as they relate to the street and our buildings on West 77th Street. - Ensuring that future buildings along 77th Street face the street so that our properties are not looking at their back doors. Thank you for your time and consideration, Tom Fletcher I ).f President AEX Communications, Inc. Fletcher Management, Inc. 52- 224 -5500 phone 952- 224 -5501 fax 4445 West 77th Street Suite 170 Edina, MN 55435 rj Kimberly Montgomery January 21, 2014 Dear Edina City Council, As you know I have followed the redevelopment of GrandView closely over the past 7 years. I have sat in on all of the current CAT sessions taking or recording notes. Some people have commented that the CAT is divided and stuck. It is not. The majority is simply exercising democratic process through an honest, informed disagreement with the minority. The majority believes in determining public uses for the former public works site first and foremost. Edina has many needs for updated and centrally located public amenities: A short list includes: recreation, arts and culture, adult and early childhood education, pre - school, meeting spaces, shared workspaces, This near - transit, centrally located land is the last parcel of public land to meet those criteria. When asked by the Maui News what he valued most from the 2013 Legislative session, Hawaii Speaker of the House, Joe Souki cited the purchase of land for the public at Launiupoko. He said: "No matter what the cost the value of that (public land) is forever. It was the right thing to do". As guardians of the public trust, I urge you to: 1. Vote to preserve this public land. 2. Acknowledge our needs for public amenities and 3. Continue a process for determining those needs. As always, thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Kim Montgomery Here is a short reading list demonstrating current thinking about public land and public amenities: A Chance to Enhance Green Space: h!!p://www.startribu.ne.com/local/south/218452741.html, Popularity of City-Run Fitness Centers Skyrockets: http://www.startribune.com/local/west/221738091.html A Street Corner Serenade for the Public Plaza: http•/ /www nytimes com/2013/06/02 /arts /desi a- prescription- for - plazas -and- public- spaces.html? r=0 Park Board buys more Riverfront Land in Northeast Minneapolis: hU:/ /www tcdailyplanet net/news/ 2012 /11/09 /park- board -buys- more - riverfront- land - northeast- minneapolis Minneapolis Park Board Buys Another Marshall Street Property l http•/ /www tcdailyplanet net/news/ 2013 /09 /04 /minneapolis -park- board -buys- another - marshall - street- ro e To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: January 21, 2014 Subject:. Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action EK Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 r• i Deb Mangen From: Jack Rice <ricecompany @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 3:59 PM To: James Hovland; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Nelson Jim Subject: Some thoughts re Grandview Some reflections re Grandview. As I understand it the Council may set a time certain to receive the report and/or recommendation of the committee working on the future of the former public works property and it's relationship with the broader Grandview neighborhood. The committee may or may not reach a.consensus position. If there is not consensus nothing precludes a majority report and a minority report or other minority reports being received by the Council for consideration. They all could and probably would have valid points. But, It will eventually be up to the Council alone to, decide the land use direction. In this particular case the City is in a very strong position because it OWNS THE LAND. Nothing can be done without City approval. No developer can come in and say they have acquired the land and because it's guide planned or zoned for this use or that use the City must approve the proposal. This property will be redeveloped upon a plan and timetable of the City's choosing. Regarding the loss of public land, remember that when the City acquired the Con Agra site it GAINED 8 acres. As I understand it the former public works site is 4 acres. If in the redevelopment process an entity wants to acquire the land in accordance with a combination of uses that the Council approves, there's no reason the City couldn't sell the land. Proceeds could be used for whatever, but maybe applied to reduce the bonding of the new public works building. There would still be a net gain of 4 acres of public land. Just some thoughts, Thank you, Jack Jack Rice 612 - 384 -0057 4001 West 49th Street Edina, MN 55424 ricecompany(d)-aol. com Deb Mangen From: US Holocaust Memorial Museum <information @ushmm.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:02 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Lead Your Community in Remembering the Holocaust M ASST Rl4DA1fS QF'REMFMBRANCE UI- Dear Mayor: The US Congress established the Days of Remembrance as America's annual commemoration of the Holocaust and created the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a permanent living memorial to the victims. In 2014, the Days of Remembrance will take place April 27— May 4. In accordance with its Congressional mandate, the Museum is responsible for leading the nation in this annual observance and encouraging institutions across the country to hold remembrance events. Your personal leadership is critical to our national commitment to remember the Holocaust and educate our citizens about the consequences of unchecked hatred. In addition to observing the Days of Remembrance with special programs, we hope you will issue a Days of Remembrance proclamation for distribution in your city. A sample proclamation is available here. Please send your proclamation to proclamations(cDushmm.org. Germany, In May 1939, bound for safe haven in Cuba. Collection of WalterKarliner, Museum of Jewish Heritage —A Living Memorial to the Holocaust, New York City The theme for the 2014 observance is Confronting the Holocaust. American Responses. This year, we commemorate the anniversaries of two seminal events in Holocaust history: the refugee crisis in the spring of 1939 and the deportation of Hungarian Jews five years later. American responses to the persecution and murder of European Jews invite reflection on the role of individuals, organizations, and governments in confronting hatred and mass atrocities. Please visit the Museum's website for further information and resources, including an opportunity for your community to share information about your remembrance event and learn about other observances nationwide. In addition, the Museum has created a CD /DVD with suggestions and ready -to -use materials for organizing civic, military, and interfaith programs. 1 We will mail you the Planning Guide and Resources for Annual Holocaust Commemorations in the next few weeks. Thank you for your partnership with us in this important mission. A YVY- - &O&VI Tom A. Bernstein Chairman /kY4�� Sara J. Bloomfield Director 2 Deb Mangen From: Chris Karlik <Chris.Karlik @mapeterson.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 3:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Cost saving for Edina Building Department Dear Council Members, In order to receive the report summarizing building permits in Edina (known as the Keystone Report) the Edina Building Department requires that they print the report. The fee for this is 25 cents per page and the individual requesting it is required to come in and pick it up. The 2013 Keystone Report for Edina in our offices was printed by the Edina Building Department. The report is approximately 342 pages which translates to a fee of approximately $85.50. The vast majority of the pages are not needed but there was no way to request specific information be separated out. The Edina Building Department staff has always been courteous and helpful in meeting requests for the reports. However requesting this report from the City of Minnetonka and other cities is much easier. Their staff offers to email the report at no charge. There is no waste of resources such as paper, toner, travel time and fuel to retrieve the report. By receiving the report as an email it is possible that it can be read with no pages printed at all. Would the City of Edina consider joining these other cities in this conservation measure? Chris KarUk Office: 952 - 925 -4006 x 214 Cell: 612 - 327 -1880 Fax: 952 - 925 -0664 Email: chris.karlik(i�mapeterson.com Web: www.mapeterson.com Location: 6161 Wooddale Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 N'*. rr' guiding your dredm home . CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication including any attachments may contain information that may be privileged, confidential and is exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you believe you have received this E -Mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by E -Mail or by calling 1- (952) 925 -9455 and delete the original message and any backups from your computer system. All personal messages express views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to MlAIPeterson Designbuild, Inc. or any of its affiliated organizations and may not be distributed without this disclaimer. Ifyou have any questions concerning this message, please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation. Deb Mangen From: Melanie A. Stratmoen <Melanie.Stratmoen @hennepin.us> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:44 PM To: Kevin D Dockry Subject: 2014 Coordinated Request for Proposals - Informational Session - January 22, 2014 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Hennepin County is soliciting proposals for the following programs: • Transit - Oriented Development (TOD) Program • Affordable Housing.lncentive Fund (AHIF) • HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Application deadline: Thursday, February 2.$h at 4:30 p.m. Eligible Applicants: Applicant eligibility depends on program. Public agencies, nonprofits, far - profits qualify for at least one program: Applications are available at www.hennepin.us /business /work- with - henn- co /rfp or by contacting the program contact. PROGRAM OVERVIEWS Transit - Oriented Development (TOD) Program Contact: Thatcher Im bode n, "612- 348 -4191, thatcher.imboden @ hennepin.us $2.2 million available in grants and loans to support public and private projects that support the creation of walkable communities that have a mix of uses and densities that support transit use. Additional information: www.hennepin.us /tod Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) Contact: Carol Stinar, 612 - 348 -2670, carol.stinar @hennepin.us $2.7 million available in loans for capital financing to create or preserve long -term affordable housing units throughout Hennepin County. Additional information: www.hennepin.us /ahif HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME). Contact: Tonja West - Hafner, 612 - 348 -2599, tonia.west- hafner @hennepin.us Approximately $1.5 million available in regulated grants and loans to create or preserve long -term affordable housing units for very low and low- income families and individuals, homeless individuals and persons with special needs in suburban Hennepin County. HOME is a.U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program administered by Hennepin County on behalf of the Hennepin Housing Consortium. Additional information: www.hennepin.us/homeprogram PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SESSIONS Informational Session Representatives of Hennepin County will provide an overview of the RFP, the programs, and other possible County resources ** available for affordable housing and transit oriented development. Approximately one hour of presentations will be made beginning at 9:30 a.m. followed by an "open house" time to talk to the program contacts. Wednesday, January 22 "d 9:30 a.m. —11:30 a.m. Ridgedale Library - RHR Conference Room —12601 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Technical Assistance Sessions Program representatives are available for one -on -one meetings to provide technical assistance on the RFP. For questions, please contact the program contacts. Please contact Melanie Stratmoen at 612- 348 -2216 or Melanie.stratmoen@hennepin.us to schedule a technical assistance session. Friday, January 24th 8:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. 701 Building - Suite 400,701 Fourth Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55415 Tuesday, January 28th 8:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. 701 Building - Suite 400,701 Fourth Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55415 Thursday, January 30th 8:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. 701 Building - Suite 400, 701 Fourth Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55415 * *Environmental Response Fund (ERF), Environmental Services Recycling Program, Continuum of Care (COC), Supportive Housing Incentive Fund (SHIF) and Group Residential Housing (GRH). While not part of the CRFP, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are allocated by the suburban cities during this time frame. For more information on the availability of CDBG funds, contact the city in which your project is located. Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then.promptly delete this message from your computer system. . f (iv�:s fa dvJ 21 CL- yn F ,� � �.E.�.�,� his � �- 7��� � �`�• e Zr<ver u Our �eal�k 66�5 sencvns ML' c/- n Me V cakuc-L,l z CL-F4' � re r l�u� lus� i. „ " /Hf1Nk - Nughes, br. — G�rnkel, TNi��r YO U Cd►nc�. Fi/'���'�scu� +tie, w►o it cM�(��1 s� �cJtcl�l7 to � ct�� call 'a vi u4v� -1 "6 Fly e- �v,Se C�v�f1 ��l"�-%zsf1 uv►KIiS G� ci�Yr,cv►t`{:r --'�<< �l u� � c� u� erne pr& hu uc SuGln de " ` 3 s.►� F Clifford Wexler ,4405 W 44th St Minneapolis, MN 55424 W., xe THEWATERS OF EDINA7 Thursday, January 23, 2014 4 pm to 7 pm Please join us as we celebrate the Grand Opening of our premier senior living community. Enjoy hors d'oeuvres, wine, champagne and a martini from our Martini Luge. RSVP kindly appreciated but not necessary DSexton @TheWatersSeniorLiving.com 1 (952) 322 -7500 The Waters of Edina 1 6300 Colonial Way I Edina, MN 55436 Harvey L. Turner 7315 Glo►ichester Dr. Edina, Minn6sota 55435 (952) 412 -0881 hlt2ncl@grnail.com To: James Hovland, Mayor Joni Bennett, City Council Member Mary Brindle, City Council Member Josh Sprague, City Council Member Ann Swenson, City Council Member Re: A Strategy For Fred Richards Golf Course Honorable Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council: Encouraged by the Council's desire to have an informed, broad -based deliberative discussion, the following thoughts for the future use of Fred Richards Golf Course are presented in the belief that it likely offers another opportunity to further enhance the community. Given the fact that economics is a primary factor in determining the quality of life in a city, I realize that a sound business and marketing plan is essential to achieve a valued community goal. I suggest that it would be in the City's best interest to transform Fred Richards into a national model Junior /Senior Golf Instruction and League Academy. Such a plan would coincide with and support existing City aspirations about the quality of our educational system, preservation and enhancement of our housing stock, and the retention' and attraction of superior retail facilities. A national model golf academy would broaden and enhance recreational opportunity - -thus further strengthening both the social fabric and the reputation of the city. The plan would be to provide a structured learning environment for both 8 thru 10 year -old junior golfers (some might be summer campers) and 55'+ year -olds/ retirees; while also promoting team- oriented league play for all age groups throughout the season. The teaching program for juniors would allow instructors to take their students from a learning station directly to the course; and, by the time they are eleven years old, have them wanting and prepared. to be etiquette informed, and responsible junior fee patrons at Braemar. As suggested recently on the Golf Channel's Morning Drive program, "putting tee shirts on youngsters and affording them the opportunity of play as a member of a team (8, 9, and 10 year olds) affords kids (and their parents) who may be interested in golf an experience offered in other sports," i.e. the hockey, soccer, basketball, and baseball programs in our community. The commentators also stated that "it may be the best way to ensure we are doing all we can to stem the drop in rounds played at existing courses." The senior instructional and team play program could be offered during the half -day opposite the juniors. While the instruction portion of the program may be separate for men and women, the more "social" team play aspect could be conducted as either single gender or mixed team or both. Filling Fred Richards in the morning and the afternoon would still. allow "industrial league" play to continue at the course in the evenings —thus producing a full fee paying day. Weekends would be totally open play. With the clubhouse facility and the course already in existence, it appears that a only a relatively small investment would be required to achieve a meaningful transformation at Fred Richards. I believe that as many as four netted "teaching stations" could be placed along the route between the clubhouse and the existing first tee. There is ample space for a second "chipping and bunker play green" that should be developed to compliment the existing "putting clock." Creating an informal classroom environment in a portion of the clubhouse would support lecture and video instruction. Improving the snack bar (Braemar ice arena model) could significantly enhance demand. Nothing would need to be done to the course; and observation leads me to believe that existing maintenance (equipment and personnel) is sufficient to handle the proposed enhancements. I believe that with the right business operation and marketing plan, the City can attract both national and local money to help support such'an endeavor. As a first of its kind facility (that could also be open to residents of Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Richfield, and South Minneapolis), I am confident that it would be easy to promote - including showcasing the initiative through both local and national media. Realizing that any plan must be financially responsible (largely self. sustaining), I would, still ;be hesitant to dispose of a valued existing asset that potentially can be made into something special. Once lost, some facilities can regrettably be very difficult to replace. Respectfully yours, lNe-r Harvey L. T er _ Direct of Pl nning University of Minnesota (retired) _4 Discussion and Feedback The 1 -494 Corridor Commission cordially invites our legislative delegation and committee leaders to our January 24th meeting. Commissioner Zelle will make the case for why an investment in transportation is necessary and time sensitive. Will Schroeer from the Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce will speak to the return on investment that follows investments in our transit system. Join us to strategize how to move forward for progress in the 2014 session and to discuss transportation priorities including: • Reconstruction of the 494/35W Interchange • Southwest Corridor LRT • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • Transportation Economic Development Projects Date and Time: Friday, January 24111, 2014 Breakfast: 8:30 - 9:00 a.m. Meeting: 9:00 - 10:30 a.m. ! "1 4, Z',tl(3ii. RA ;---4, -. -.,,- . ;4— Center ambers) Center is located just west of 1 -494 at liston Road. bagels before the meeting sa Madison by Wednesday, sa @494corridor.org or 1 -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION Rcdvcin Trdfi.*c !'r1i�,c;esLioil Bloomington o Eden Prairie o Edina r, Minnetonka o Richfield '/ 7 // ( 14, 11 -e 7L,, (-7 Sc, C-f -7 11 CeLl I 'Set� -7 VL -e di, z ,-tce evne-11,;ez,,v�', of f� lef AVENUE SUMMIT ,