HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-05-20_WORK SESSIONAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMMUNITY ROOM
TUESDAY, MAY 20, 2014
5:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
11. ROLL CALL
III. FORMER GRANDVIEW PUBLIC WORKS REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance
in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-
927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS
Tues
May 20
Work Session — Former Grandview Public Works Redevelop. Process
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
May 20
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 26
MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Tues
Jun 3
Work Session —joint Meeting With Energy & Environment Comm
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Joint Meeting With Edina Community Health Commission
6:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Jun 3
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Jun 17
Work Session — Community Vision Consultant Interviews
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Jun 17
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Jul I
Work Session — PACS Approval Process /Living Streets Implementation
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Jul I
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Fri
Jul 4
INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Tues
Jul 15
Work Session — Business Meeting/Art & Culture Donations
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Jul 15
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Jul 29
Filing Opens for Municipal Offices On November General Election
CLERICS OFFICE
Mon
Aug 4
Work Session Tree Ordiannce
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Mon
Aug 4
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thur
Aug 7
CANDIDATES INFORMATION SESSION
5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 12
PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M.
Tues
Aug 12
Filing Closes for Municipal Offices On November General Election
5:00 P.M.
CLERK'S OFFICE
Tues
Aug 19
Work Session —Blake Road Corridor Study
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Aug 19
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5/16/2014
IMP a t�,
o e 1
Grandview
Former Public Works Site
Redevelopment Process
City Council Work Session
Item III
May 20, 2014
0 2014 Resident Survey
— .Edi -MN .9w
2
M
Agenda 0
1) Grandview Planning Background
2) Questions for Consideration
3) New Information regarding Community Facilities
0 2014 Facility Inventory
0 2014 Resident Survey
0 2014 Infrastructure Capacity Studies
4) 2014 Community Advisory Team (CAT) Proposals
• RFI for Consultant
• RFI for Development Partner
5) Discussion
— Edi -Wgov
1.1) Grandview Planning Background
• Edina Public Works in need
of expansion (2007 -2010)
• outgrew 3 -acre Grandview site
• moves to newly acquired 8 -acre
site on Metro Blvd.
• Land sale for full private`
development considered to
defray land acquisition costs
(2008)
• City Council decides to pursue
a different course
Former facility
5/16/2014
2
1.3) Grandview Planning Background
• Grandview Development
Framework adopted in 2012
• Full year of community planning
• Direct involvement by 50+ person
Steering Committee
• Dozens of community meetings
• Hired consultant team
• $100,000+ investment
okue�VA.,L 5
�'�i-
.a' 'tea
C ~ a 1.9 '`` `Fib
lSbA
CITY OF EDINA
6
1.4) Grandview Planning Background
The Development Framework generally describes a catalytic
new project on the former Public Works site that sets the
tone for future development throughout Grandview.
IIMM-7!'*VrS7A! -:wfJiC4l1 A'rrM idn-111J11 Mr-7:7- e&lz
` \\ re specifically,
Framework
,y }" sail,
low
prominently
5/16/2014
3
5/16/2014
c9,,n 7
71.5) Grandview Planning Background
• Moving from Vision to Reality
• Work session April 16, 2013 — discuss strategy to implement
Development Framework
• Use RFl process to select development partner for Public Works site
• Seek site to potentially relocate school bus operations
• Support redevelopment of other sites
• Convene Community Advisory Team to assist in implementation
• Prepare TIF District to fund variety of public improvements
v .EOinaMN.gov
8
1.6) Grandview Planning Background
Strategic Steps towards Implementation
Concept Planning Implementation: Site Planning, Feasibility Studies,
D sl and Cons uction
Sm911 Publi6 flue
Development
Convene
Establish FIF
Com leted
vrow.Ed ;naMN,gov
9
M1.7)Grandview e Planning Background
• Community Advisory Team conceived May 17, 2013
Purpose is to
• ° ...provide real world real estate expertise and community vision to
assist and inform staff during the implementation process."
Anticipated roles and activities include...
• Preliminary input to shape the Request for Interest (RFI) for the Public
Works site,
• Review of RFI responses and recommendation to City Council
• Plus others to be determined
• Community Advisory Team named in June 2013
• Co- chairs Fischer & Janovy elected
• Regular meetings from July 2013 to March 2014
www,Ed;-MN .p ,
010
crry OF EDINA
1.8) Grandview Planning Background
• At the request of CAT, additional Council direction
provided in September 2013
Affirmed preparation of RFI to find development
partner
• Survey Edina residents about community use of site
Inventory community facilities and identify gaps
• Proceed with simultaneous preparation of RFI, target
completion Jan. 2014
• CAT meets regularly to discuss concerns and ideas
• Consultants engaged to gather new information
WEBER
I F.,:. {
5/16/2014
5
1r
1.9) Grandview 7xtend Background
tional Council direction provided in
What posslbl loansary 2014
ajority of Council reaffirmed preparation of
aawmna FI to find development partner
� Majority appears to support mixed
°„°°,public/private concept
`*� No support for 100% private concept
RFI completion to March 2014
1 M RFI • CAT continues to discuss RFI and related
Bpd, V w _P t0 °`� craft an
What isthebest\F4 ner7 concerns
to work with a
prDcesS Facility Inventory and Resident Survey
a� • results presented in February 2014
• Two RFI's submitted for City Council
consideration in March 2014
w�tNw.4rf4 12
e
iJ\ /dY M
2) Questions for Consideration 1.
Council direction is needed to see action and progress in Grandview!
• Clarify implementation of Development Framework? Guiding vision or
collection of interesting ideas?
• Should staff continue on path to find potential development partner and
prepare community- driven redevelopment options for the site?
• Which of the CAT prepared RFI's does the Council prefer?
• Does Council prefer a combination of public /private uses or full public
use of the site?
• Which other efforts should be prioritized to promote redevelopment
goals? Transportation planning? Possible relocation of bus
operations? Financing and Grants?
rnvw.EdinaWgov
5/16/2014
ti.
13
•
3 1) New Information Community Facilitie��
• Community Facility Inventory
•��•
completed Feb 2014
_
• Community Center
• School District Facilities
• Arts & Theater
—,
4
-
_
• Gymnasiums :
I �- I PQ
• Swimming Pools
• Meeting and Event Space
• Parks
_
o { ,i- �+ I
�"_
S39„
• Senior Center
JA2.
Library
14�
���s''���., -,• r
*;
• Schools
��
:- r:
��;
• Other
<�
�� I C43i
• Fitness Centers and Clubs
=P,g
` j ! •
. PublicArt
14
3.2 New Information -Community
a Facilitie �:_ z� '•
• Perceptions from a� =�
Consultant
• Multiple use ° r Y- •�
spaces? 1 ® r } S204 �y F, 07L-i Y
• Art Center growth? L,Mwg �oo� f
Mi
• Office space for } t `oa= woa 1
i-
civic groups? �. (. ' 01
-'Sm.! [ O 4
AM,
• Fitness center or i
gymnasium?
Fd 1r
F M s nw
0
• Community °. -°* s2o: `,' —
education growth ?, �cao" : I
Fd
• Senior center A 2 = ri 1A0d F�
40a- -
growth? _ L 1
. a ad0a
SsOa S001t
"4WEBER 4( `.S ! 00 sso,, ,A=
5/16/2014
7
(OQ�oe .,;,�� 15
W file
rr ,11
3.3) New Information - Community Facilitiei`. "�__..,J�
• Resident Survey completed
Feb 2014
• 400 households randomly
polled by telephone
• Questions developed based
on input from key
stakeholders (CAT, Parks &
Rec., Community Educ.)
• Results are mixed
Development Preference
2714 Gty 01 Gd-
gava.w io
o� n:
M.95YVp 9
curer- vv6evp ,9
ro „mans
Priority of Potential Uses
2314 C.:y L' EC- a
ar®na�v..
u.assw.w
0 6 10 A b
r•!ls 04m.1
5/16/2014
lJ
16
3Nw Information -
Community Facilitie
Consultants evaluated infrastructure
systems to determine capacity for BARR SEH
new development
• Domestic water — ADEQUATE,
• Local Transportation network —
FIRE FLOW IMPROVEMENTS
CAPACITY ADEQUATE, NO ATYPICAL
POSSIBLE IN L4)N(rFERM
CRASH DATA, IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED
TO ACHIEVE REDEVELOPMENT GOALS
• Sanitary Sewer — ADEQUATE,
. County & State Transportation
DOWNSTREAM IMPROVEMENTS
MAY RE NEEDED IN LON(rTERM
network — CAPACITY ADEQUATE, LONG-
TERM CHANGES RECOMMENDED TO
• Storm Sewer — ADEQUATE
UNIFY DISTRICT
wwv+Edin.MN.gw
5/16/2014
lJ
160, ^l� 18
CITY OF EDINA
4.2) Community Advisory Team Proposals
RFI for Development Partner
• Minority of CAT appear to support
this strategy
• City to retain primary control
• Identifies critical points when City �- _ -�- - •` -"`_°'
can choose to continue or terminate _M _ • =�. _ f::,
relationship _ ._ -• _ _
• If preliminary steps successful, City
could continue with same partner "� • _ a
-
Expedite community planning and feasibility review Perception that development partner is
• Share costs of studies with potential development partner biased by self interest
5/16/2014
9
17
4.1) Community Advisory Team Proposals' °`�
•
RFI for Consultant��
• Majority of CAT members tend to
support this strategy _` _ -•�
• Prefer to refine potential projects
independently
• Concerned with potential loss of
control if developer brought in early_
• Concerned with possible communi
need for more land in this area
• After final study is complete,
traditional RFP suggested to select -
developer or builder.
• Fully investigate all concepts Requires additional time
• Guided by third parry professional with no vested May result in additional cost to City
interest in outcome Still requires real -world financial feasibility review
160, ^l� 18
CITY OF EDINA
4.2) Community Advisory Team Proposals
RFI for Development Partner
• Minority of CAT appear to support
this strategy
• City to retain primary control
• Identifies critical points when City �- _ -�- - •` -"`_°'
can choose to continue or terminate _M _ • =�. _ f::,
relationship _ ._ -• _ _
• If preliminary steps successful, City
could continue with same partner "� • _ a
-
Expedite community planning and feasibility review Perception that development partner is
• Share costs of studies with potential development partner biased by self interest
5/16/2014
9
20
• ole�
5) Discussion
Questions?
Council direction is needed to see action and progress in Grandviewl
Clarify implementation of Development Framework? Guiding vision or collection of interesting ideas?
Should staff continue on path to find potential development partner and prepare community -driven
redevelopment options for the site?
Which of the CAT prepared RFI's does the Council prefer?
Does Council prefer a combination of publictprivate uses or full public use of the site?
Which other efforts should be prioritized to promote redevelopment goals? Transportation planning?
Possible relocation of bus operations? Financing and Grants?
Discussion
vnwi,EdlneMN,pov
5/16/2014
10
9,tQA. ,,� 19
4r' •. �.fT
4.3) Community Advisory Team Proposals
• Both RFI drafts share a
Recommended process
similar format and similar
conduct
content
st C", to review responses,
and select partner.
• General objective
interviews
Process to
►�nercreatep
• Summary of background
St_City &Pa esite.
uses fortb
work by community
identify apProP�ate
based
residents
Ste 3: Imple1nentcommuntiv scenarios
alternative
• Four step process to identify
process to generate
density,
plans (uses, density,
community priorities for
Y p
Including: ge0eral
etc), economic model,
public space
circulation,
• Respondent submission
stagingmolel.
to consider
requirements
• Potential to
St�Clty Council
and possibly lect one to
process select
alternatives
implement.
— .Edm.MN,9.1
20
• ole�
5) Discussion
Questions?
Council direction is needed to see action and progress in Grandviewl
Clarify implementation of Development Framework? Guiding vision or collection of interesting ideas?
Should staff continue on path to find potential development partner and prepare community -driven
redevelopment options for the site?
Which of the CAT prepared RFI's does the Council prefer?
Does Council prefer a combination of publictprivate uses or full public use of the site?
Which other efforts should be prioritized to promote redevelopment goals? Transportation planning?
Possible relocation of bus operations? Financing and Grants?
Discussion
vnwi,EdlneMN,pov
5/16/2014
10
Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC)
2014 Annual Work Plan
Complete each section with a white background. Add or delete tables as needed. Return to the Assistant City Manager by September 24.
Anti - bullying event and /or education — Edina Reads I By 2 n Quarter 2014 I $800 I Video, publicity and
communications.
Progress Report: Bully Prevention Event with Children's Book Author Nancy Carlson - Feb 8, 2014 at Edina Senior Center.
Approximately 30 children in addition to their parents, grandparents and caregivers attended. Children in attendance were ages 2
— 9 (grades PK — 3) Autographed copies of Nancy book, "Henry and the Bully" were given to guests.
2014 New Initiative
Target Completion
Budget
Staff Support Required
Council
Date
Required
Approval
Community Outreach- Developing cross
9/30/14
$500
Admin support and
organizational partnerships to gain an
communication.
understanding of community needs related to
census demographic changes.
Conduct Community Listening Sessions
Reach out to those that live and work in Edina,
including Somali, Hispanic, African - American, and
South Asian populations.
Potential Partners- Edina Resource Center, Edina
Police, Somali and Asian Community leaders.
Progress Report: Commissioners Bigbee and Davis are chairing this initiative
Awareness Ca
October 2014 1 $300
Progress Report: This was added to our 2014 work plan by a previous commissioner no longer on the EHRRC. There is interest
from a new commissioner regarding a special needs awareness campaign or event this year.
Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRQ
2014 Annual Work Plan
Plan an activity for Days of Remembrance April 2014 to $1500 Video, publicity and
coincide with the communications.
Genocide Awareness Event national celebration
of Yom Hashoah
Progress Report: Edina's HRRC partnered with World Without Genocide to host a series of Human Rights Events in April to
remember the victims and honor the survivors and liberators of the holocaust and other genocides around the world. Fred
Amram, holocaust survivor, presented information about the impact of genocides on families and communities (Rwanda, Congo,
Darfur, Kenya, Holocaust) around the world as well as lessons we can learn about initial indicators that can help us to prevent
human rights abuses in the future. Over 100 guests attended the week long Human Rights events; April 8, 10 and 13.
2014 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Staff Support Required Council
Date Required Approval
immigration • • •
Progress • • On • •
Proposed Month for Joint Work Session:
T
Staff Comments:
Council Comments:
Human Rights and Relations Commission (HRRC)
2014 Annual Work Plan