Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-06-17_COUNCIL MEETING
/. AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion: There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda ,,and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council. Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of June 3, 2014 And Work Session Of June 3, 2014 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 6/5/2014 TOTAL $679,798.72 And Per Pre -List Dated, 6/12/2014 TOTAL $1,209,941.83 C. Approve Cooperative Agreement For Emergency Communications Services D. Approve Ancillary Agreement 01, Procurement Of Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System E. Request For Purchase — Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System Solution F. Resolution No. 2014 -55 Establishing Precinct 5 and Precinct 10 Polling Locations For The 2014 Election Cycle G. Appointment To Arts & Culture Commission H. Request For Purchase — Geographic Information System (GIS) Database Design For Park System — Geographic Technologies Group 1. Braemar Master Plan Task Force Appointment J. Traffic Safety Committee Report On May 7, 2014 K. Resolution No. 2014 -67 Public Improvement And Special Assessment Agreements L. Request For Purchase — Professional Services Agreement With Future iQ Partners M. Resolution No. 2014 -68 Approving A Special Law Authorizing Tax Increments Financing Districts For Housing Purposes And Expenditures From the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District Agenda/Edina City Council June 17, 2014 Page 2 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Receive Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Year Ended December 31, 2013 B. Speak Up Edina — Edina Senior Center VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff :members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To 'ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Issuance of Housing Revenue Bond On Behalf of Yorktown Continental, LP, Resolution. No. 2014 -65 Conduit Debt (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve), B. PUBLIC HEARING - Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Residential Density For Mixed Use -Area, Building Heights Floor Area Ratio And Land Use, Resolution No. 2014 -68 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass) C. PUBLIC HEARING - Final PUD Rezoning, Final Development Plan, Lennar Corporation, 6725 York Aven'W,'and 6712, 6708, 6704 ,6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, Resolution No. 2014 -69 and Ordinance No. 2014- Mixed Use Area, Building Heights Floor Area Ration And Land Use, Resolution' No.2014 -69, Ordinance No. 2014 -6 (Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass) I►�111��Z�1L Yl�lRNi11IrKdrolaIQl4,64111ii During "Community Comment" the. City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the some issue in the interest of time and topic Generally speaking items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community' Comment Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Request For Purchase — 2014 -2015 City Insurance Contracts Agenda/Edina City Council June 17, 2014 Page 3 B. Authorize Issuing Request For Interest For Development Partner — 5146 Eden Avenue (Former1clina Public Works Site) C. Flood Protection And Clean Water Improvement Study Update D. Approve Edina Active Routes To School Comprehensive Plan E. Resolution No. 2014 -63 Award Sale of $5,925,000 G.O. Utility Bond, Series 2014A, F. Resolution No. 2014 -64 Authorizing The Ground Lease & Lease Agreement Providing For Construction of the Edina Sports' Dome, Braemar Outdoor Ice Rink_ and Lease By the City And Improvements To Braemar Arena And Pamela Park G. Second Reading: Ordinance No. 2014- 8 Amending Chapters 4 And 6 Concerning On -Sale Liquor Licenses With Amusement Devices (Second Reading. . Favorable rollcall vote of three Council. Members to pass.) H. Resolution No. 2014 -66 Accepting Various Grants & Donations IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes I. Human Rights & Relations Commission, April 29, 2014 2. Planning Commission, May 14, and May 28, 2014 3. Park Board, May 13, 2014 4. Heritage Preservation Board, May 13, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT Agenda/Edina City Council June 17, 2014 Page 4 EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Meeting of June 3, 2014 V. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -03 Awarding The Sale of $16, 360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 V1. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE - Award of Bid, Contract,-3, Improvement P -23, 50th & France District Parking & Wayfinding Improvements VII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE, UP.COMINGt MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jun 17 Work Session - Community Vision Process Introduction with future IQ 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jun 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jul I Work Session — PACS Approval Process /Living Streets Implementation 5 :30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul I Regular Meeting, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jul 15 Work Session — Business Meeting/Art & Culture Donations 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jul 29 Filing Opens for Municipal Offices On November General Election CLERK'S OFFICE Mon Aug 4 Work Session —Fred Richards Redesign 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM. Human Rights Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Aug 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 5 Night To Unite Thur Aug 7 CANDIDATES INFORMATION SESSION 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 12 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M. Tues Aug 12 Filing Closes for Municipal Offices On November General Election 5:00 P.M. CLERK'S OFFICE Tues Aug 19 Work Session —Blake Road Corridor Study/Tree Ordinance 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Sep I LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sep 2 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 16 Work Session —TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7: 0iP.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 3, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA — APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. by Member Swenson, approving the meeting IV. CONSENT AGENDA IV.1— ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item IV.I.C., Request for Purchase, 2014 -2015 Salt Purchase; Item IV.I.I., Amendment Lunds Byerly's 71 France Addition Development Contract; and, Item IV.1 j., Ordinance No. 2014 -07 Amending Chapter 8 Concerning Dogs, as follows: IV.I.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of May 20, 2014 IV.I.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 22, 2014, and consisting of 35 pages; General Fund $149,261.40; Police Special Revenue $2,541.79; General Debt Service Fund $450.00; Working Capital Fund $223,100.95; Equipment Replacement Fund $8,848.70; Art Center Fund $2;227:84;' Golf 'Dome Fund $162,191.87; Aquatic Center Fund $6,113.64; Golf Course Fund $19,669.01; Ice Arena Fund $7,24638; Edinborough Park Fund. $2,79.4.93; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $10,530.89; Liquor Fund $228,425.88; Utility Fund $80,887.36; Storm Sewer Fund $3,845.48; PSTF Agency Fund $1,195.95; Centennial TIF District $58,655.88; Grandview TIF District $1 ,716.50; Southdale 2 District $41,1104-.23; TOTAL $1,012,808.88 and for receipt of payment of claims dated May 29, 2014, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $165,025.63; Police Special Revenue $455.95; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $3,871.40; Working Capital Fund $847,980.95; Equipment Replacement Fund $110,054.00; Art Center Fund $695.63; Golf Dome Fund $670.14; Aquatic Center Fund $10,11 OS.04; Golf Course Fund $28;698.15; Ice Arena Fund $10,446.85; Edinborough Park Fund $5,848.07; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $13,450.38; Liquor Fund $145,674.70; Utility Fund $275,812.71; Storm Sewer Fund $4,564.52; PSTF Agency Fund $4,936.00; Centennial TIF District $30,855.01; Southdale 2 District $963.50; TOTAL $1,660,108.63; and, Credit Card 'Transactions dated March 26, 2014 — April 25, 2014; TOTAL $40.284.41 Ems: Request#er Purchase, 201 Purchase IV.I.D. Request for Purchase, 2014 Elgin Crosswind Street Sweeper, Public Works — Utilities, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Mac Queen Equipment, Inc., State Contract #70741, at $182,148.00 IV.I.E. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid — Improvement P -23 50th and France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements (Contracts 1, 2, 4 and 5), awarding the bid for Package I to the recommended low bidder, Blackstone Contractors, at $447,000.00; and awarding the bid for Package 2 to the recommended low bidder, Restoration Systems, at $863,000.00; awarding the bid for Package 4 to the recommended low bidder, Blackstone Contractors, at $1,089,045.00; and, awarding the bid for Package 5 to the recommended low bidder, Superior Painting, at $204,397.00 Page I Minutes /Edina City Council /June 3, 2014 IV.I.F. Reject Bid — Contract ENG 14-6-West 54th Street IV.I.G. Authorize Cost Share Agreement and Maintenance Plan with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District IV.I.H. Approve Change Order — Contract ENG 14 -3 Bredesen Park D and Countryside F Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, W P41da & Sons, Inc. at $424,819.49 for watermain replacement M.I.I., Amendment Lunds Byerly's!71 France Addition Development Gentrac jinannee- Ne. 2014 07 Amending Chapter 8 Concerning Dogs IV.I.K. Approve., Request for Information for Consultant Services for Small Area Planning Process, Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.1 IV I.C. REQUEST FOR. PURCHASE, 2014 -2015 SALT PURCHASE —APPROVED Member Bennett recused herself from the vote as her husband was a pensioner of Cargill. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving Request for Purchase, 2014 -2015 Salt Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended: low bidder, Cargill, Inc., State Contract #77774, regular road salt at $65.97 per ton; and, Contract #77778, treated road salt at .$81.39 per ton. Ayes:: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: None Abstain: Bennett Motion carried. IV3.1. LUNDS BYERLrS 71 FRANCE ADDITION DEVELOPMENT. CONTRACT AMENDMENT — APPROVED Member Brindle, made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving Lunds Byerly's 71. France Addition Development Contract Amendment. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried.. IV.I.J. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -07 AMENDING CHAPTER 8 CONCERNING DOGS — TABLED The Council expressed concern with the ordinance wording relating to damage and consent. Manager Neal suggested. staff .solicit the Council's comments prior to the July I, 2014, Council. meeting.: Member Brindle made a motion_, seconded by Member Bennett, tabling consideration of Ordinance No. 2014- 07 Amending- Chapter 8 Concerning Dogs, to the July 1, 2014, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle; Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA IV.11 —ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by .Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.II.A. Request for Purchase, Pamela Park Field Artificial Turf, Field Turf Synthetic Turf Sports Fields, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Field Turf at $379,540.71 IV.II.B. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid — Contract #13 -6PK, Sports Dome, Arena Outdoor Refrigerated Rink Bid Package Two, awarding the bid to multiple vendors.in multiple bid and quote categories at $3,399,318.00 total quotes and bids IV.II.C..Request for Purchase, Award of Bid :- Contract #13 -7Pk, Pamela Park Site Work, awarding , the bid to multiple vendors in multiple bid and quote categories at $.1,622,858.00 total quotes'.and: bids Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Page 2 Minutes /EdinaCity Council /June 3. 2014 Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. LEGACY DESTINATION AWARD — CONSERVATION MINNESOTA — RECEIVED Sheila Smith, Executive Director of Minnesota Citizens for the Arts, and Paul Austin, Director of Conservation Minnesota, congratulated the City for its use of Legacy Amendment opportunities and declared Edina to be a Legacy Destination. The Council thanked Ms. Smith and Mr. Austin for recognizing Edina in this way. V.B. BICYCLE FRIENDLY COMMUNITY AWARD — LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS — RECEIVED Steve Clark, League of American Bicyclists, described the mission of the League to help cities become bike friendly and congratulated Edina for receiving this recognition. Nick Mason, Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota, presented details on bicycle ridership and stated Edina had been awarded the Bicycle Friendly Community Bronze Award. He congratulated the City's leadership and the Bike Edina Task Force for d success in this regard. The Council thanked Mr. Clark and Mr. Mason for their positive comments about Edina. V.C. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF RICHARD STANEK —RESCHEDULED This item to be rescheduled. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD = Affidavits.of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. CONSIDER VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, PORTION OF WEST 67TH STREET — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -61 ADOPTED Engineer Presentation Engineer Millner presented the request of Xerxes Investors, LLC, for vacation of public right -of -way for a portion of West 67th Street to allow Hennepin County to resolve a gap in the property title. Attorney Knutson answered questions of the Council related to preservation of transportation rights -of -way. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Public Testimony Jim Halvorsen, 6700 Xerxes Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Knutson clarified that the consideration was to complete the vacation of the easement, and if someone thought they had an ownership- interest, that person should seek advice from a private real estate attorney. The City was not determining ownership or transferring title with this action. Member .Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -61, Vacating a Portion of West-67th Street. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT , Frank Lorenz, 7501 York Avenue South, Unit 720, presented concerns relating to traffic congestion on France and Penn Avenues due to road construction and the need for-additional parking at 506 and France. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /tune 3. 2014 VIII.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -10 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ALLOWING R -1, R-2,. AN P06-1 PROPERTY TO BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague indicated Ordinance No. 2014 -10, was introduced on May 20, 2014 on a vote of 4 -,1. and if granted Second Reading, would amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow consideration of R- I., R -2, and PRD -1 property within a Planned Unit Development. He explained that the Planning Commission recommended adoption on a 4 -1 vote. The Council discussed the, ordinance language and asked questions of Mr. Teague relating to examples of 'thresholds' and 'triggers', for different base zoning when applying PUD to residential properties. Mr. Teague explained 'triggers' might be considerations such as affordable housing, use of sustainable design principles, and pedestrian friendly design. 'Threshold' could be an acreage minimum. It was noted that this ordinance amendment will require neither triggers nor a threshold. Member Swenson made a motion to grant Seco.'nd Reading adopting Ordinance No. 20114-10, Amendment, Regarding Planned Unit Development Applicability in the R -1, R -2, and PRD -1 District. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes:. Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VIII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -9 AMENDING CHAPTERS 24 AND 26 CONCERNING OPERATION OF BICYCLES ON SIDEWALKS — ADOPTED Mr. Neal indicated the Council would be presented with two viewpoints: Edina Transportation Commission's (ETC's) recommendation to allow bicycles 'to operate on sidewalks; and, the Police Department's recommendation to not consider such an ordinance amendment. Transportation Planner Nolan presented the consideration of the ETC relating to Active (Safe) Routes to School and recommendation to amend Ordinance Chapters 24 and 26 to allow the operation of bicycles on sidewalks subject to several conditions. Mr. Nolan referenced the Engineering Department's Advisory Communication finding this ordinance modification was in line with the City's Living Streets Policy. Jennifer Janovy, Bike Edina Chair, answered questions of the Council relating to operation of a motorized wheelchair, indicating such a vehicle would not be excluded from operation on sidewalks. Council concern was expressed that State Statute pe mr i s the operation of a bicycle on a sidewalk and that the ETC recommendation included business districts such as 50th and France. Mr. Nolan explained that busy districts and locations where doors open onto sidewalks could be posted to prohibit operation of bicycles on sidewalks. The Council considered whether that would add a layer of complication and necessitate a higher level of public education. Police Chief Nelson presented the outlook of the Police Department not supporting this ordinance amendment as the current ordinance provided a better atmosphere for enforcement. In addition, the Department was concerned that the amendment would result in more personal injury bicycling accidents, particularly to pedestrians. Chief Nelson indicated the Police Department does not have the resources to enforce the proposed ordinance amendment and preferred to keep the ordinance unchanged. The' Council acknowledged the safest facility for a bicyclist was on a dedicated bicycle path; however, the City did not have the resources to create such paths throughout the City. The Council discussed the use of bicycles on sidewalks and asked questions of Chief Nelson relating to enforcement and safety. Member Swenson, made a .motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -9, Amending Chapters 24 and 26 of the Edina City Code Concerning Operation of Bicycles on Sidewalks. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Page 4 ;'f Minutes /Edina City Council /lune 3. `2014 Mr. Nolan stated the ETC does not disagree with the safetyAssues raised'by Chief Nelson; however, it was currently not legal to ride a bicycle on a sidewalk so bicyclists, 'motorists, and pedestrians have not yet been educated about how to do so safely. Mr. Millner indicated discussion had been held about the age of bicyclists and it was found that as age increases, bicyclists would move to the street because it was a faster route. Those who were not comfortable with using the street would prefer to remain on the sidewalk where the pace was'slower. The Council found that bicycling on sidewalks was already occurring and because Edina did not have an off- road bicycle system or regional trail, support was expressed for the amendment as it allowed the City to develop a system of routes based on ability. The correspondences submitted by Bicycling and Walking Program Manager Steve Clark and Dr. Paul Moritz were referenced that detailed the higher 'incident of accidents between cyclist and vehicles when cyclists unexpectedly enter traffic from a sidewalk or side path. Concern was expressed relating to allowing bicycling in congested business districts; confusion that might result about which business districts were and were not posted, and complication of enforcement. Rollcall: Ayes:; Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson Nay: - Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -8 AMENDING CHAPTERS 4 AND 6 CONCERNING ON -SALE LIQUOR, LICENSES WITH AMUSEMENT DEVICES —FIRST READING GRANTED Economic Development Manager Presentation Economic Development Manager Neuendorf reviewed the proposal of Simon Properties to reoccupy the mostly vacant third floor space at Southdale Center by extensively remodeling much of that level to accommodate a new destination restaurant, Dave and Busters. However, the City's code prohibited issuing an on -sale intoxicating liquor license to this type of business. He presented the basis of staffs recommendation to amend City Code to allow the issuance of full- service liquor licenses with restaurants that also offer amusement games of skill. Proponent Presentation John Phipps, Simon :Properties, described the difficulty in leasing this space, alternatives that have not been successful, and belief that a destination retailer such as Dave and Busters would be a good fit. He stated their support for the ordinance amendment and asked for the Council's favorable consideration. Mr. Phipps, explained Dave.and Busters were located in a variety of Simon malls and while the layout might be different, the format remained the same. This location would - be unique in not having an outdoor entrance. The Council acknowledged that Simon Properties had made a transformative investment into common areas of over $15 million in addition to a $5 million loan from the City. Ben Martin, Southdale Shopping Center Manager, stated that investment had significantly impacted occupancy of the main wing for the better, reaching nearly full occupancy. However, the second wing had been more challenging. It was believed that Dave and Busters would result in a positive impact to lease the second wing and bring Southdale Center to nearly full occupancy. Lisa Warren, Vice President of Development with Dave and Busters, presented the company's history, business concept, flexible format that adapted to the market, customer and sales profile. She stated Dave and Busters was excited about the offering in Edina at Southdale Center, finding it an attractive market. Ms. Warren presented a preliminary floor plan. Jill Valachovic, Dave and Busters, described Dave and Busters' amusement offerings and stated no game paid out more than $10 worth of redeemable tickets in a single play. -Dave and Busters anticipated hiring 140 to 160 employees. Ms. Valachovic reviewed Dave and Busters' community partnerships, daily operations, house policies, and high level /robust training and certification required of employees, floor captains, and managers. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 3. 2014 It Ms. Warren stated this plan provided more: booth seating than a prototypical plan and peak hours were 5 p.m.. to 9 p.m. on weekends. The national food -to- beverage ratio was 70% food to 30% beverage. Mr. Martin explained when Southdale. Center was 'not open, that wing of the mall would be cordoned off with stanchions to direct Dave and Busters' customers to the exit. Mr. Neal stated the issue before the Council was the ordinance amendment and the questions relating to security, and exiting Southdale Center had not yet been reviewed by Police Chief Nelson or the Fire Department. Chief Nelson answered questions of the Council relating to public safety and indicated that in 2014, there were 40 calls for service at the Maple Grove Dave and Busters, two being medical related. In: 2013,, Southdale- Center had 714 calls for service. The Council considered the distance of Southdale Center from residential property due to the lateness of. hour Dave and Busters would be open. Chief Nelson, stated. he found Dave and Busters' house ,policies to be more restrictive than the norm and Maple Grove, had indicated Dave and Busters was a good corporate citizen and friendly /cooperative with the Police Department. The Council, asked question's of Mr. Neuendorf and Mr. Teague about the ordinance language. Ms. Warren explained how Dave and Busters' house policies were developed through 30 years of practice and 70 successful locations. At the request of Council, Ms. Valachovic described a 'tower of beer' that was a 50 oz. pitcher served to three customers, noting each customer was asked for identification. Mr. Phipps stated. Simon Properties had a positive 'experience with Dave and Busters, which started in 1996, and Simon_. Properties intended to continue to invest in this concept. Ms Valachovic stated in most locations, the minor policy does not allow .for anyone under the age of 18 without a parent or guardian; however, in some locations.-the minor policy does not allow for anyone under the age of 21 without a parent or guardian. Member Sprague made a motion to grant First,.Reading to Ordinance No. 2014 -8, Amending Chapters 4 and 6 of the Edina City Code Concerning Alcoholic Beverages and Amusement Devices. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The.Council indicated it was impressed with the management of Southdale Center by Simon Properties. Support was expressed for the ordinance amendment based on Simon Properties' positive experience and track record with Dave and Busters. It was acknowledged that Maple Grove also had a positive experience with Dave and Busters and there was benefit from 30 years of experience in developing a good business plan and effective house: policies. Concern was expressed relating to this particular model and promotion of liquor, which was not a good match for Edina, as well as the imbalance between private profit and public expense (Police Department). The options were raised to require a minor policy for 21 years of age rather than 18 years of age and to restrict this type of use to certain properties. The Council reviewed the properties where this use could be requested. Attorney Knutson advised that if the amendment was approved, any business meeting these criteria could proceed. Council support was expressed to consider, prior to second reading, language requiring the leased space be at least 30,000 square feet in gross floor area and in a.building similar to Southdale Center. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion carried. VIII.D. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LIVABLE COMMUNITY GRANT AWARD 66 WEST APARTMENTS BY BEACON Mr. Neal explained that Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative had a limited number of days to apply for grant funding and the City had not yet taken steps to approve that project. He noted the proposed language was written in a speculative fashion that would allow Beacon to move forward without binding the City in a regulatory or legislative standpoint or to accommodate that type of housing. Member Swenson made a motion, • seconded by Member Bennett, indicating the City was receptive and willing. to accept LCA grant funds if the Beacon application was successful. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Page 6 eY Minutes /Edina City Council /June 3. 2014 Motion carried. VIII.E. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY 50TH AND FRANCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT — APPROVED Mr. Neuendorf presented staffs recommendation to clarify the method used to distribute special assessments for the'$5.8 million restoration and improvement project for the 50th and France commercial area. If approved, this policy would supplement the City's existing policy that governed all types of special assessment projects. Member:: Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving Special Assessment Policy to clarify the method to distribute special assessments in the 50th and France commercial area. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle left the Chambers. VIII.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -62 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -62 accepting various grants and donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett,. Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Member Brindle was out of the Council Chambers for this vote. Motion carried. VIII.G. CITYWIDE MARKED CROSSWALK STANDARD — APPROVED Mr. Nolan presented the recommendation of staff and the ETC for standardized crosswalk markings based on Council direction at its February 3, 2014, meeting. Member Brindle returned to the Chambers. The Council discussed crosswalk marking options and visibility and durability of each method. Mr. Nolan answered questions of the Council relating to long -term staff costs. Mr. Millner advised that Public Works was at the limit of what could be marked each year without impacting level of service. Member'Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett approving the Citywide marked crosswalk standard. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE IX.B. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMUNICATION: EEEP /PACE IX.C. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMUNICATION: PLASTIC WATER BOTTLES IX.D. MINUTES: 1. ART & CULTURE COMMISSION MINUTES, APRIL 24, 2014 2. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, APRIL 17, 2014 Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 3, 2014 XII.A. SOUTHDALE 2 AFFORDABLE HOUSING — Received XII.B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RE: RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN MIXED USE AREA — Received XII.C. NEW SALES TAX CHANGES —To be presented June 17, 2014 XII.D. FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION — Received Informational; no action required. XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 17, 2014. Video Copy of the June 3, 2014, meeting available. Page 8 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OFT HE WORK SESSION OF THE ;EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 3, 2014 S:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:06 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Tim Barnes, Facility Manager; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer; Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator; Annie Coyle, City Manager Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; and Brian Olson, Public Works Director. Mayor Hovland stated the meeting would consist of joint sessions with the Energy & Environment Commission and the Edina Community Health Commission. JOINT SESSION WITH ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION Energy & Environment Commissioners attending the meeting included: Bill Glahn, Bob Gubrud, John Howard, John Heer, Diane Plunkett Latham, Bill Sierks, Paul Thompson, and Elana Sokol. Sarah Zarrin entered the meeting at 5:10 p Sarah Bale entered the meeting at 5:12 p.m. LOCAL FOOD WORKING GROUP REPORT Chair John Heer asked: Commissioner Latham to lead the presentation for the Local Food Working Group Report. Ms. Latham noted the Working Group would be reviewing recommendations that the City adopt code changes allowing residents to keep bees and domestic chickens. She added the Group was suggesting consideration of -the Eden Prairie model which allowed bee keeping via a bee keeper registration process.''In addition the Group would offer code changes that would allow residents to keep domestic chickens (hens only) and put a limit.at four hens per property. The Council and Commission discussed the process of registration of bee keepers, setbacks for both bee keeping and hens. Based on the discussion, members of the working group will work on code amendments for consideration by the Council. INTEGRATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHAPTER 10 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS Discussion included possible ways to develop comprehensive strategies to measure movement towards achieving a smaller carbon footprint and incorporating greener procedures. Staff noted during the development of the current Capital Improvement Program, staff would be adding the potential energy impact of each project. It was also noted that during the visioning project sustainability could be incorporated as an objective. BUSINESS RECYCLING TASK FORCE The Business Recycling.Task Force updated the Council on its work with Hennepin County and the 50th and France Business,. District in recycling. The group will continue to work directly with Hennepin County and Edina businesses and will produce written findings, a report and recommendations. The City Council thanked the Commission for its work on behalf of all Edina citizens. JOINT SESSION WITH THE EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION Edina Community Health Commissioners attending the meeting included: Matt Doscotch, Nadia Martyn, Kristin Conner, Virginia Ogle, Alison Pence, Michael Sackett, Joel Stegner, Melinda Bothun - Hurley iwho— —entered the meeting at 6:20 p.m, and Aditya Mittal who entered the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /June 3, 2014 E- CIGARETTE /NICOTINE DELIVERY DEVICE REGULATIONS EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH RECOMMENDATIONS Chair Pence reviewed the Commission's recommendation that the e- cigarettes /devices be banned by ordinance from all indoor spaces in Edina and that they be treated like tobacco for regulatory purposes. Following discussion consensus was to treat vaping like regular tobacco smoking and enact a complete ban on the practice in all indoor facilities (public and private) and outdoor City -owned parks. HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES — EDINA MISSION AND VISION LANGUAGE UPDATE The Commission and Council discussed the draft revisions mthe-City's visioning statement that would include - health and wellness values and goals. The Commission will have a chance to participate in the visioning process that will begin soon. 2074 WORK PLAN UPDATE The Commission briefly reviewed progress on its 2014 Work Plan The City Council thanked the Commission for its work on behalf of all Edina citizens. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 17, 2014 James B. Hovland, Mayor 2 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41 6/5/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 243.10 343381 43164200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 55.18 343567 43164300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 73.10 343730 43258900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 138.05 343569 43259100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22.50 343570 43259200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 45.00 343724 43259300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 415.75 343723 .43259400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.55 343726 43259500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 828.81 343722 43259600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.55 343568 43259700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 124.88 343728 6428500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING . 460.94 343727 6431700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 49.87 343382 90224100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 40.63 343729 90258800 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 91.31 343.725 90258900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 80.05 343571 _90259000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,742.27 42 616/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 13.14- RETURN 343625 CP- WO- 935963 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009337 - 343321 WO- 935012 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 249.94 PLAYGROUND, PROGRAM SUPPLIES 343323 WO- 935963 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 147.57 DISCS, CDS, CORKBOARD 00003054 343452 WO- 936057 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22.04 STAPLER 00003055 343453 WO- 936061 -1 1490.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 42.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 343322 WO- 936062 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL '49.15 LASER PRINTER LABELS 343455 WO- 936316 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 164.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 343454 WO- 936324 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 712.77 43 615/2014 104020 DALCO 308.24 ROLLTOWEL 00009331 343339 2745321 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 170.08 DEGREASER 00003813 343644 2750361 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 397.50 GRILL CLEANER, GLASS CLEANER 00006330 343645 2750895 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 875.82 44 6/612014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,317.71 AXLE 00006142 343365 955784 -00 5422.6530 - REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 406.55 PUMP, ELEMENTS 00006145 343364 956250 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 174.09 BRAKE CABLE 00006148 343537 957264 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 489.60 IRRIGATION PARTS 343675 959263 -00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice.& Summary 615/2014 - 6/512014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 44 6/6/2014 100906 MT] DISTRIBUTING INC. Continued... 2,387.95 383246 616/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 121.20 343376 1784456 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 95.60 343373 1789193 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 54.00 343375 1789847 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 91.20 343374 1789848 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 79.60 343377 1789849 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14.00 343721 1791023 ' 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 71.60 343719 1791024 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 107.60 343718 1791025 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.80 343717 1791595 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 79.60 343720 1791596 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 811.20 383246 6/6/2014 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 109.77 SECURITY SERVICES 343320 510161288 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 109.77 383247 6/6/2014 102716 ALLEGRA EDINA 64.00 NO TRESPASS FORMS 343451 104399 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT, GENERAL 64.00 383248 6/6/2014 103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 210.00 AV EQUIPMENT RENTAL 343638 ALERTINV16064 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 210.00 383249 6/6/2014 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 915.97 FOOD 343639 405230588 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 915.97 383260 6/6/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 101.21 COFFEE 343640 430148 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 101.21 383261 6/6/2014 132976 ARCHER, JESSICA 157.31 SAFETY BOOTS 343769 060214 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 157.31 383262 6/6/? 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383262 6/6/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 36.95 343379 51959 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,173.00 343380 52010 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 952.00 - 343566 52621 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 789.25 343378 52626 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,951.20 383253 6/6/2014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 59.97 BATTERIES 00001185 343508 018- 338733 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.97 383254 616/2014 127908 BAZZILLIONS, THE 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/12/14 343624 053014 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 383266 6/5/2014 126139 BERNICK'S 200.00 343383 135764 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20.00 343573 137079 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 253.25 343572 137080 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 444.00 343574 137081 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 917.25 383266 6/5/2014 133926 BIX PRODUCE CO. 78.12- CREDIT 343642 02857297 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 182.70 FOOD 343641 02884625 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 104.58 383267 6/5/2014 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 21,617.50 JUNE 2014 PREMIUMS 343456 EDINA- 6/2014 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 195,113.00 JUNE 2014 PREMIUMS 343456 EDINA - 6/2014 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 216,730.50 383268 6/612014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 81.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003811 343509 97771 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.82 383269 6/6/2014 104694 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 121.80 TOW FOR POLICE VEHICLE 343770 050114 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.80 383260 6/6/2014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 61512014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383260 61612014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS Continued... 108.00- 343385 119586 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 870.00 343384 119851 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 284.50 343575 119992 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 308.50 343731 120032 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,355.00 383261 615/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 120.00- CORE RETURN 00005880 343773 813654 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 167.48- CORE RETURN 00005193 343772 842962 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.94 WIRING ASSEMBLY 00005218 343771 845529 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 60.26 OILCAPS 00005269 343774 854731 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 737.56 REAR BRAKES 00005361 343775 855093 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 539.28 383262 6/512014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 15,185.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 343324 384813 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 15,185.00 383263 6/5/2014 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/10/14 343622 053014 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 200.00 383264 6/6/2014 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 164.00 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 343643 34358 5822.6575 PRINTING 164.00 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 343643 34358 5842.6575 PRINTING 164.00 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 343643 34358 5862.6575 PRINTING 492.00 383265 6/6/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 793.88 343387 331893 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 34.30 343388 336299 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,829.60 343386 336412 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 18.55 343732 340758 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 383266 6/512014 129923 CAWLEY 25.86 NAME BADGES 343626 V224558 1500.6103 25.86 383267 6/517" 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page- 4 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 383267 6/512014 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 431.05 982.48. 1,501.76 2,927.63 1,279.87 133.53 330.18 1,190.30 7,581.12 1,254.52 98.94 276.76 354.86 772.23 1,124.38 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No 343511 8000014561-5114 1481.6186 343511 8000014561-5114 1552.6186 343511 8000014561-5/14 1628.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 1646.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5111.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5430.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5422.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5420.6186 343511 8000014561 -5114 5511.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5761.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5821.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5861.61 B6 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5841.6186 343511 8000014561 -5/14 5913.6186 343511 6000014561 -5114 5921.6166 343511 8000014561 -5114 5911.6186 Subledger Account Description Continued... HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 5 Business Unit YORK FIRE STATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT WELL PUMPS 23,380.95 383268 61512014 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 63.59 10089900-4 343334 10089900 -5/14 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,465.76 5546504 -1 343329 5546504 -5/14 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,203.81 5563827-4 343332 5563827 -5/14 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 838.20 5584304 -9 343326 5584304 -5/14 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 20.67 5584310 -6 343327 5584310 -5/14 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 77.85 5590919 -6 343328 5590919 -5/14 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 3,373.00 5591458-4 343325 5591458 -5/14 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 74.16 5596524 -8 343333 5596524 -5114 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 813.52 8034001 -1 343331 8034001 -5/14 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,215.89 9724639 -1 343330 9724639 -5/14 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 10,146.45 383269 6/6/2014 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 4,892.73 343335 2831512 5720.6166 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 90.95 343336 2831852 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 4,983.68 383270 61612014 129696 CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 161.38 WHISKEY BARRELS 343510 240311 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 161.38 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 6/512014 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 196.28 343389 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 196.28 615/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383271 6/6/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 123.30 952 631 -0024 343627 0024 -5/14 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 55.58 952 929 -0297 343702 0297 -5/14 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 57.00 952 920 -1586 343338 1586 -5/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 74.26 952 922 -2444 343337 2444 -5/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 369.55 952 927 -8861 343703 8861 -5/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 40.44 952 922 -9246 343513 9246 -5/14 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 129.06 952 920 -9996 343512 9996 -5/19 2310.6188 TELEPHONE 849.19 383272 6/6/2014 118723 CHAPMAN, DELORES 1,261.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 343514 052714 1470.4329 1,261.80 383273 615/2014 103236 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 162.00 SW METRO SWAT BASIC SCHOOL 343457 OFFICERS 1401.6104 TRAINING 383274 6/512014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 196.28 343389 0118349415 5842.5515 196.28 383276 6/6/2014 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 3,685.22 OFFICE FURNITURE 343458 61954 -0 5511.6406 3,685.22 383276 6/612014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 434.81 UNIFORM CAPS 343516 28977 5761.6201 696.67 UNIFORM JACKETS 343517 28992 5761.6201 2,018.33 UNIFORMS 343515 29009 5761.6201 3,149.81 383277 6/6/2014 133672 CROM OIL COMPANY 172.00 APR 2014 WASHES 343459 409124 1553.6236 172.00 383278 6/6/2014 134160 CUPERUS, TOM 220.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 343708 GOLF 5401.4593 220.00 AMBULANCE FEES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CAR WASH 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 6 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL E911 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM YORK SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383279 6/512014 134109 CUSHING, JILL Continued... 85.00. ART CLASS REFUND 343518 D52214 .5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 6/312014 10:36:57 Page- 7 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 85.00 " GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD 383280 6/6/2014 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 451.00 ROOF REPAIRS 343777 052277 1551.6103 451.00 383281 6/6/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,224.00 343395 752626 5822.5514 61.40 343394 752627 5822.5515 21.50 343393 753664 5862.5515 3,756.15 343392 753665 5862.5514 3,268.70 343390 753667 5842.5514 97.20 343391 953666 5842.5515 8,428.95 383282 61512014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 3,034.90 JUNE 2014 PREMIUM 343460 F018342- JUNE14 9900.2033.16 3,034.90 383283 615/2014 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 60.45 BAKERY 343646 506388 5421.5510 50.74 343647 506528 5421.5510 218.01 343648 506901 5421.5510 88.86 343649 506933 5421.5510 418.06 383284 6/6/2014 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 5,062.16 APRIL 2014 SURCHARGE 343340 19922053060 1495.4380 5,062.16 383285 615/2014 129167 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 503.71 MAILING PREPARATION 343704 6450 -01 1120.6106 503.71 383286 6/6/2014 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 5524 OAKLAWN AVE 343519 ED128256 REFUND 1495.4109 2,500.00 383287 6/612014 129080 DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC. 6/312014 10:36:57 Page- 7 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383287 6/6/2014 129080 DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC Continued... 2,524.35. SOAP 343776 IN- 1246672 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 2,524.35 383288 6/6/2014 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 494.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 343765 060214 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 494.00 383289 6/6/2014 124749 EAGAN'POLICE DEPARTMENT 25.00 K9 COVER CLASS 343461 .052814 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 25.00 383290 6/6/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 250.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 343462 101350 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 250.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 343462 101350 5842.6122. ADVERTISING OTHER 250.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 343462 101350 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 300.00 EDINA ART CENTER AD 343341 101351 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 500.00 TASTE OF EDINA LIQUOR ADS 343463 101413 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER • 500.00 TASTE OF EDINA LIQUOR ADS 343463 101413 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 500.00 TASTE OF EDINA LIQUOR ADS 343463' 101413 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 47.88 PUBLISH NOTICE 343650 102316 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 63.84 PUBLISH ORD 2014-05 343651 102317 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 198.33 EDINA DIRECTORY AD 343652 103588 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 198.33 EDINA DIRECTORY AD 343652 103588 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 196.34 EDINA DIRECTORY AD 343652 103588 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 130.88 ,PUBLISH NOTICE 343520 104565 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 3,387.60 383291 6/6/2014 118010 EGAN, BILL 275.00 REMOVE BEAVER 343521 051914 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 275.00 383292 6/6/2014 100049 EHLERS 410.00 CONDUIT DEBT /FAIRVEIW 343522 348159 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 410.00 383293 6/6/2014 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 7,889.40 NEW SQUAD ASSEMBLY 343705 AW041814 -4 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,694.40 NEW SQUAD ASSEMBLY 343706 AW0418144A 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 11,583.80 613/2014 10:36:57 Page - 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 50TH STSELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTINGENCIES POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/512014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383294 6/612014 117483 ENGELE, LEE Continued... 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/9/14 343620 053014 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 383296 6/6/2014 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 33.50 343733 259 -1136 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 33.50 383296 6/6/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 98.06 END KITS 343779 1- 4449059 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 152.96 BATTERIES 00005110 343781 1- Z01190 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 442.59 ROTORS, SHOE SET, DRUMS 343778 69- 138894 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 290.71 RACK & PINION 343780 69- 138946 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 984.32 383297 616/2014 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 413.32 COFFEE 343653 59389541SO 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 413.32 383298 616/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 4,578.45 METERS, FITTINGS 00001128 343343 0079752 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 223.00 SPACERS 00001128 343342 0080065 5917.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES METER REPAIR 7,087.46 METER REPLUMBS 00001986 343464 76399/76528 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 11,888:91 383299 61612014 106361 FOSTER, REBECCA 94.17 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 343782 053014 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 94.17 383300 6/6/2014 100919 FREY, MICHAEL 34.35 PETTY CASH 343344 052314 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 38.26 PETTY CASH 343344 052314 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 41.66 PETTY CASH 343344 052314 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50.92 PETTY CASH 343344 052314 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 252.04 PETTY CASH 343344 052314 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 417.23 383301 6/612014 117006 GALLAGHER, LUCILLE 81.00 ART CLASS REFUND 343523 052214 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 81.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 720.00 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 542.25 Council Check Register by GL 383304 6/6/2014 103186 GERTENS Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 383308 6/6/2014 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 615/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383302 6/6/2014 PLANTINGS & TREES 123080 GARDENVIEW GREENHOUSE 5,873.00 Continued... 1,581.00 PLANTS, POTS, SOIL 00006158 343654 538389 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 383309 6/6/2014 2,475.40 FLOWERS 00006158 343655 538390 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 4,056.40 29.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 343763 383303 6/6/2014 1,418.00 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 00006103 343657 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page- 10 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 384.00 CAPS 343629 11648010 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 336.00 VISORS 343628 11648063 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TREES & MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL. STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 720.00 167085 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 542.25 383304 6/6/2014 103186 GERTENS 383308 6/6/2014 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 770.00 PLANTINGS FOR PW GROUP LESSONS 343656 30945011 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5,873.00 770.00 383309 6/6/2014 383306 6/6/2014 126936 GOLF SCORECARDS INC. 29.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 343763 REFUND 1,418.00 SCORECARDS 00006103 343657 38033 5410.6575 PRINTING 1,418.00 383310 616/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 383306 6/6/2014 COBRA 101103 GRAINGER 6/2014 1550:6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SE! S GENERAL 133.40 GLOVES 00006321 343658 9438479090 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 553.02 SOT SUPPLIES 00003791 343525 9443740304 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 183.48- RETURN 343346 9444428016 1322.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 413.40 GLOVES 00001115 343345 9445083646 1301.6556 TOOLS 205.70 AIR REGULTOR 00001031 343524 9447679672 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ' 329.60 SAFETY VESTS, GLOVES 00001177 343347 9448092552 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,451.64 383307 6/5/2014 542 25 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC TREES & MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL. STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE 343396 167085 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 542.25 383308 6/6/2014 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 5,873.00 GROUP LESSONS 343659 052914 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5,873.00 383309 6/6/2014 134068 GUDMUNDSON, LYNNAE 29.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 343763 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 29.00 383310 616/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 7.60 COBRA 343632 6/2014 1550:6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SE! S GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 616/2014 1130.6575 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. CITY OF EDINA PRINTING 140.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER Council Check Register by GL 152075 994.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 152396 1,134.00 6/512014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No _ Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383310 616/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS APR 2014 ROOM & BOARD 343526 Continued... 5,136.38 JUNE'2014 BASIC LIFE 343631 6741652 -9 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 383314 7,632.09 MAY /JUNE 2014 343630 6756782 -6 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 12,776.07 1,272.00 RADIO FLEET FEE 343527 1000045143 383311 616/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 383316 177.12 BEEF PATTIES 343660 025159 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 383312 616/2014 1130.6575 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 5760.6575 PRINTING 140.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 343348 152075 994.00 BANNERS 00002052 343662 152396 1,134.00 383313 6/612014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,695.50 APR 2014 ROOM & BOARD 343526 1000045753 2,695.50 383314 616/2014 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,272.00 RADIO FLEET FEE 343527 1000045143 1,272.00 383316 6/6/2014 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 282.98 OFFICE FURNITURE 343465 540517 282.98 383316 6/6/2014 101680 HIAWATHA LUMBER CO. 618.94 LUMBER FOR TRAINING 00003809 343663 159888 618.94 383317 6/612014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,646.50 343397 703299 1,473.50 343576 704167 1,859.50 343577 704617 4,979.50 383318 6/6/2014 129608 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 487.08 MAIL LATE NOTICES 343714 90193 487.08 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1130.6575 PRINTING 5760.6575 PRINTING 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5511.6406 1470.6579 5822.5514 5862.5514 5642:5514 5902.6103 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAINING AIDS 6/312014 10:36.57 Page - 11 Business Unit PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING GRILL GRILL COMMUNICATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE LEGAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 615/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383319 6/612014 101146 IMPACT TELECOM Continued... 413.55 343349 608253240 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 383320 6/6/2014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 5862.5514 1190.6105 5210.6180 5901.4626 1185.4391 1490.4171 5422.6182 1645.6182 5822.5514 5822.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5421.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5513 5421.5514 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 12 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS SALE OF WATER ASSESSING GOLF DOME PROGRAM UTILITY REVENUES OTHER FEES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEALTH RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL 10u.uu 343398 19609 150.00 383321 6/6/2014 121034 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING 70.00 SUBSCRIPTION 343466 803595 -2014 70.00 383322 6/6/2014 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 250.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 343528 63701 250.00 383323 616/2014 134119 JERRY ANDERSON PLUMBING 1,051.45 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 343529 052814 1,051.45 383324 6/6/2014 134161 JERRY'S LEMONADE 50.00- ADMIN FEE 343634 ART FAIR 360.00 FOOD LICENSES REFUND 343634 ART FAIR 310.00 383326 6/5/2014 121076 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 213.62 TOILET RENTAL 343664 75439 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 343350 75445 265.12 - 383326 6/6/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,510.15 343400 2209355 17.55 343399 2209356 147.60 343578 2209359 8,207.89 343734 2210679 78.80 343579 2210680 600.00 343665 2220584 38.80 -- 343582 2225409 3,798.35 343580 2225410 18.00 343581 2225412 525.40 343666 2229047 5862.5514 1190.6105 5210.6180 5901.4626 1185.4391 1490.4171 5422.6182 1645.6182 5822.5514 5822.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5421.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5513 5421.5514 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 12 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS SALE OF WATER ASSESSING GOLF DOME PROGRAM UTILITY REVENUES OTHER FEES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEALTH RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount 383326 616/2014 17,864.94 383327 61612014 36.71 395.44 432.15 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. IRRIGATION PIPE 00006143 343351 68083043 5422.6611 QUICKSILVER 00006251 343530 68180770 5422.6545 Subledger Account Description 'Continued... IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT CHEMICALS Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS 383328 6/612014 134162 JOHNS, GRETCHEN 100.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 343709 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 100.00 383330 6/6/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,916.82 343401 1855688 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 195.36 343402 1855691 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,113.15 343403 1855693 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 123.00 343404 1855709 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 126.90 343583 1856241 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 61.12 343405 1857242 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 586.69 343590 1860588 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,999.40 343742 1860589 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 333.88 343735 1860593 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.21 343586 1860594 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.72 343737 1860595 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 957.88- 343589 1860598 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 61.87 343593 1860599 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,131.67 343585 1860600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 123.00 343584 1860601 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,403.32 343592 1860602 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD.LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,792.46 343588 1860603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,904.08 343591 1860604 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,357.46 343587 1860605 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 521.49 343744 1860606 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,113.90 343739 1860607 _5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 41.98 343740 1860608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,372.01 343741 1860609 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,815.52 343743 1860610 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,904.56 343738 1860612 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 164.48 343736 1862344 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.12- 343407 619050 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12.63- 343406 619224 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383330 6/6/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 5.00- 343408 619335 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.67- 343746 619729 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.50- 343745 619730 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 34,996.01 383331 6/612014 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 86.80 KEYS 00002053 343667 S1010126 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 86.80 383332 6/6/2014 134117 KRATZKE, ROBERT 1,213.12 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 343531 052914 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,213.12 383333 6/6/2014 129668 KURT, KAREN 1,559.95 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 343467 052714 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 1,559.95 383334 6/6/2014 134106 LARSON, LYLE 109.06. UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 343533 4432 FONDELL DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 109.06 383336 616/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 188.01 SILICONE SEALANT 00001168 343352 9302465650 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 188.01 383336 6/6/2014 116399 L'HEUREUX, ADAM 39.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 343532 051914 .1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.96 383337 616/2014 100868 LOGIS 272.25 PD LOGGER 343354 38437 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,633.50 NETWORK SUPPORT 343354 38437 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 272.25 WIFI .343354 38437 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 1,234.41 ENTRUST TOKENS 343353 38498 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 ADMIN CHARGE 343355 38513 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,579.53 VALUE NOTICES 343355 38513 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 3,365.39 WIFI CONTROLLER MAINT 343355 38513 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 9,407.33 383338 6/517" 122801 LOVAAS, JULIE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383338 6/6/2014 122801 LOVAAS, JULIE Continued... 69.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PROGRAM 343764 REFUND 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 69.00 383339 6/6/2014 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,048.95 343594 174594 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS GOLF REVENUES SOO.OD VOICE OVER- ELECTION VIDEOS 343715 2014 - EDINA 1 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 500.00 383346 6/6/2014 131067 MCF /LINO LAKES 20,175.00 WORK CREW 343469 205794 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 371.25 WORK CREW 343470 207382 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 20,546.25 1,048.95 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 73.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 343783 052914 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.92 383340 6/6/2014 110.00 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 110.00 RECEIPT COUPONS 343471 77920 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,171.83 IMPELLER W /BLADES 343468 2141361 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 174.74 SOLENOID VALVE 343356 2143881 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,346.57 383341 6/6/2014 134163 MARKER, ALYSSA 99.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 343710 GOLF 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES 99.00 383342 6/6/2014 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 360.00 HOSTING FEE 343668 195 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 360.00 383343 6/612014 134161 MCCLEES, AMANDA 50.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 343711 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS 50.00 383344 6/6/2014 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS GOLF REVENUES SOO.OD VOICE OVER- ELECTION VIDEOS 343715 2014 - EDINA 1 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 500.00 383346 6/6/2014 131067 MCF /LINO LAKES 20,175.00 WORK CREW 343469 205794 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 371.25 WORK CREW 343470 207382 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 20,546.25 383346 6/6/2014 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 73.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 343783 052914 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.92 383347 6/6/2014 133904 MEDIAWORKS 110.00 RECEIPT COUPONS 343471 77920 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 110.00 RECEIPT COUPONS 343471 77920 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383347 6/512014 133904 MEDIAWORKS Continued... 400.00 RECEIPTCOUPONS 343471 77920 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER AMBULANCE FEES AMBULANCE FEES GENERALSUPPLIES LUMBER GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT CRAFT SUPPLIES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 16 Business Unit VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING TRANSPORTATION CENT.SERV GEN - MIS BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF REVEP 620.00 383348 6/5/2014 113941 MEDICA 425.68 SPENCER RAKE 343762 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 REFUND 439.26 ROGERANTON 343762 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 REFUND 864.94 383349 6/6/2014 101483 MENARDS 39.98 WHEELS 00006146 343669 56579 5422.6406 46.65 LUMBER 00001174 343357 57145 1646.6577 88.63 383360 61512014 122510 MERCHANTS OF GOLF 659.53 PUTTERS 00002050 343670 81496 5761.6406 659.53 383351 6/5/2014 104650 MICRO CENTER 19.99 CARD READER 00004320 343534 5005514 1262.6406 29.99 FLASH DRIVE 00004320 343534 5005514 1554.6406 69.99 ANALOG MODEM 00004320 343534 5005514. 1646.6406 245.96 TOUGHBOOK MEM & HARD DRIVE 00052214 343358 5026251 1400.6160 365.93 383362 6/5/2014 131847 MICRON CPG 190.97 TOUGHBOOK MEMORY 00004323 343535 250221728 1400.6160 190.97 383363 " 616/2014 134159 MIDSTATE LANDSCAPING & EXCAVATING 2,500.00 4015 WOOD END DR 343671 ESCROW FOR DEMO 1495.4109 2,500.00 383354 6/512014 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 27.90 UNDERGLAZE 00009336 343359 79392 5110.6564 27.90 383365 6/6/2014 100906 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 264.00 343674 45- 0150- 13 -5/1' 5401.4603 AMBULANCE FEES AMBULANCE FEES GENERALSUPPLIES LUMBER GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT CRAFT SUPPLIES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 16 Business Unit VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING TRANSPORTATION CENT.SERV GEN - MIS BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF REVEP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 613/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383356 6/5/2014 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION - Continued... 3,806.00 GHIN SERVICE 343672 45- 0150 - 16-5/14 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 10.00 343673 45- 0150 -21 -5/14 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 4,080.00 383356 6/5/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 104.00 POSTERS, BUSINESS CARDS 343360 15478 2611.6575 PRINTING MUSIC IN EDINA 104.00 383357 6/5/2014 134087 MI-TECH SERVICES INC. 1,175.00 FIBER LOCATING 343361 32011328 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,175.00 383358 6/6/2014 104477 MN STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS 595.00 LICENSE RENEWALS 343362 ASSESSOR 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 595.00 383369 6/5/2014 134165 MOLLISON, KRIS 60.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 343712 GOLF 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 60.00 383360 6/6/2014 100169 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 141.00 BUSINESS CARDS 00003809 343536 6083 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 141.00 383361 6/6/2014 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE.GROUP 13.88 CAP. 00005390 343363 523261 F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.88 383362 6/5/2014 102395 MDSE, WILLIAM 468:00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 343766 060214 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 466.00 383363 6/5/2014 117034 NAPC 100.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 343538 052814 1140.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PLANNING 100.00 383364 6/5/2014 134150 NELSON, HOLLY 300.00 OUTLOOK TRAINING 343633 1513 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION_ 300.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383365 6/6/2014 100076: NEW FRANCE WINE CO. Continued... 97.50 343409 90477 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 486.00 343595 90797 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 583.50 383366 6/6/2014 104360 NIKE USA INC. 1,267.55 UNIFORMS 343539 960159186 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 55.38 UNIFORMS 343676 960306102 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,322.93 383367 6/6/2014 132609 NOLAN, MARK 82.00 MILEAGE / PARKING 343716 053014 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 82.00 383368 6/6/2014 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 134.50 SKETCH PADS 00009332 343366 45791501 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 134.50 383369 6/6/2014 134106 NYGREN, ELAINE E 25.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 343540 052714 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 383370 6/6/2014 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 97.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 343677 711775558001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 97.04 383371 6/612014 133280 O'GARA, LAURIE 200.00 AD SALES COMMISSION 343678 0006 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 200.00 - 383372 6/6/2014 134108 OLSEN, ROBERT 11.88 UTLEY PARK RENTAL REFUND 343541 RENTAL REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 163.34 UTLEY PARK RENTAL REFUND 343541 RENTAL REFUND 1600.4722.01 GENERAL PARK RENTAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL 175.22 383373 6/612014 133190 OSLO BUILDERS 2,500.00 6100 WESTRIDGE BLVD 343542 ED129775 REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 383374 6/612014 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 156.71 SHIRT HANGERS 343679 330502 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP F SALES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383374 615/2014 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC Continued... 158.71 383375 615/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY, . 476.45 343413 8449582 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 582.50 343412 8449817 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING - 13.50- 343414 8450069 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 110.00- 343747 8450287 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.00- 343597 8450289 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,913.01 343596 8450346 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,544.00 343410 8450357 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS-SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.25 343411 8450360 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,412.71 383376 6/5/2014 125492 PAYPAL INC. - 39.95 MAY 2014 FEE 343707 32114913 5902.6155 .BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 39.95 383377 6/6/2014 134120 PELLCO EXCAVATING LLC 500.00 TRENCH TRAINING PREPARATION 343543 463 1470.6104 CONFERENCES.& SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 500.00 383378 616/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,263.26 343680 00402035 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 613.60 343681 00402038 5761.5510 COST OF. GOODS. SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 430.80 343598 00532287 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 617.58 343637 19218686 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 2,925.24 383379 6/5/2014 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC: . 350.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 343682 052714 -1 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 350.00 383380 615/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 146.12 343599 2604313 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,336.80 343415 2607921 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,162.04 343416 2607922 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 65.12 343417 2607923 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 646.72 343418 2608856 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.43 343750 2610946 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS; SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 343603 2610948 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 4,836.43 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 6/5/2014 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 1,469.37 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 343472 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1,469.37 383384 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 124637 RALPH, ROBERT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383380 6/612014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 832.00 Continued... 383386 2.24 343601 2610949 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 764.02 SIREN MAINTENANCE 343602 2610952 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,684.00 2,643.87 343604 2610953 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 134066 RENNEKE, LEE 1,803.19 343600 2610954 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 343635 2,487.08 343749 2610955 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.24 61612014 343751 2610956 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,664.51 100.00 343746 2610958 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 91.12- 343419 3527009 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 14,748.38 383381, 616/2014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 354.40 343752 21212 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 345.60 343605 21213 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 700.00 383382. 6/6/2014 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 4,236.43 VEHICLE REPAIRS 343784 22345 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 600.00 SANDBLASTING 343785 22347 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5521.6180 it -YAR111191 421460.6710 1490.6406 5760.6136 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 4,836.43 383383 6/5/2014 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 1,469.37 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 343472 0054717 -IN 1,469.37 383384 6/5/2014 124637 RALPH, ROBERT 832.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 343767 060214 832.00 383386 6/612014 106324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 3,684.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE 343544 98307 3,684.00 383386 6/6/2014 134066 RENNEKE, LEE 54.40 LAB COATS 343635 053014 54.40 383387 61612014 108669 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6111/14 343623 053014 100.00 5521.6180 it -YAR111191 421460.6710 1490.6406 5760.6136 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GIL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 615/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account. Description Business. Unit 383388 6/612014 118668 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. Continued... 40.00 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 343786 70184 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.00 383389 6/6/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 156.50 BUSINESS CARDS 343683 81445 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 109.90 343420 IND001134 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 266.40 383390 616/2014 133765 RONNING, ERIK 196.00 PUGGING 343545 052814 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 196.00 383391 6/6/2014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 226.29- 0402373069350 343473 001702 4075.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 226.29 0402373069350 343473 001702 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 226.29 0402373069350 343473 001702 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 111.35- 343474 VV PARK FOOD 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 111.35 343474 VV PARK FOOD 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 111.35 343474 VV PARK FOOD 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG 337.64 383392 6/5/2014 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 71.55 FILTERS 00001181 343367 128242 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 71.55 383393 6/6/2014 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 470.00 DOOR GLASS 00005367 343787 P46135 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT_OPERATION GEN 470.00 383394 6/5/2014 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 416.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 343768 060214 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 416.00 383395 6/6/2014 106506 SCHMIT TOWING INC. 125.00 CAR FOR TRAINING 00003807 343546 21305 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 383396 6/6/2014 134110 SHAUGHNESSY, NICK 60.00 LOADING DUMPSTER 343547 052814 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383396 6/612014 134110 SHAUGHNESSY, NICK Continued... 383397 616/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 47.44 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 343788 060214 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 228.93 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 343788 060214 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 276.37 383398 6/6/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 516.00 IQS SIGNS 343548 7808 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 516.00 383399 6/6/2014 102936 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 214.00 ICE MAKER REPAIRS 343684 47718 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 239.53 FILTERS 343685 47750 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 453.53 383400 61612014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 378.50 343421 1163282 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 363.50 343422 1164521 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,208.00 343608 1165078 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,805.50 343609 1165079 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .209.08 343607 1165080 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,002.55 343610 1165081 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,634.00 343423 1165083 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,582.50 343424 1165084 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 188.00 343425 1165085 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,876.96 343606 1165086 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,049.50 343754 1166584 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 338.50 343753 1166585 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20,636.59 383401 602014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 88.50 BALANCING VALVE 00001182 343686 S2910221.001 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.50 383402 6/612014 102261 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 212.65 BAG TAGS 343688 0000728160 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 177.00 PENCILS 343689 0000728410 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE- 727.77 PENCILS 343689 0000728410 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,117.42 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Check # Date 383403 6/6/2014 383404 6/5/2014 383406 6/6/2014 383406 616/2014 383407 6/6/2014 383408 6/6/2014 383409 6/6/2014 383410 6/612014 383411 6/6/2014 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 23 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING INSPECTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ASSESSING ASSESSING . EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,600.00 CAD AND MCT SERVICES 343477 Council Check Register by GL 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description FUNGICIDE 103265 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC 9872 5422.6545 CHEMICALS Continued... 894.30 SHOPPING CARTS 343687 57869 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,793.61 SHOPPING CARTS 343687 57869 5861.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 2,687.91 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 40.00 BEER LINE SERVICE 343693 163.75 5421.6102 343427 3139 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 126.00 343426 3169 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 289.75 120669 STEWART PLUMBING 286.05 PERMIT REFUND 343549 ED129912 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS 286.05 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/10/14 343621 053014 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 200.00 134103 STULC, NATHAN 54.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 343475 052214 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 97.71 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 343476 325521 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 152.59 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 384.00 PAINT DOOR 343368 646779 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 306.81 VEHICLE REPAIRS 343789 647088 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 690.81 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 23 Business Unit 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING INSPECTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ASSESSING ASSESSING . EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,600.00 CAD AND MCT SERVICES 343477 81257 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 5,600.00 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 2,670.57 FUNGICIDE 343550 9872 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 157.75 PAINT 00006150 343551 9994 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,828.32 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE SERVICE 343693 490219 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 40.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383412 615/2014 130367 TASC Continued... 203.00 APR 2014 COBRA 343552 IN306958 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5913.6103 5765.6406 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 24 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 203.00 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 383413 6/5/2014 VERNON SELLING 104932 TAYLOR MADE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,548.04 GOLF CLUBS 343691 22202351 676.84 GOLF CLUBS 343690 22202352 1,294.80 GOLF CLUBS 343692 22209591 5,519.68 383414 616/2014 118133 TCIC INC. 4,471.25 CABLE /ANTENNA REPLACEMENT 00001982 343478 89015 4,471.25 383415 615/2014 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 44.10 PLANTERS 00002051 343694 S194202 -IN 44.10 383416 6/5/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 89.75 343611 00741196 348.00 343695 00771918 5,182.95 343613 825659 161.25 343612 825660 5,781.95 383417 6/5/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 310.20 343428 907862 432.00 343429 908745 742.20 383418 6/5/2014 128835 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. INC. 6,605.00 WINDOWS /GLASS CLEANING 343790 W514463 6,605.00 383419 615/2014 101619 TRI- COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOC. 75.00 2014 ANNUAL DUES 343484 2014 75.00 383420 6/512014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 46.83 THERMOSTAT 00006141 343369 J187276 46.83 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5913.6103 5765.6406 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page - 24 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383420 615/2014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued... 383421 616/2014 105243 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 2,381.00 ARCHITECTURAL STORE DESIGN 343485 214032A -1 _ .5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,381.00 383422 615/2014 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 550.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 343636 102221440 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 550.00 383423 6/6/2014 122321 ULTIMATE. DRAIN SERVICES INC. 245.00 JETTING 343370 48424 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 245.00 383424 616/2014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 7.64- CREDIT 343488 311111CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 6.90- CREDIT 343489 311894CM 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 265.71 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 343486 312042 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 539.42 LIQUOR BAGS, TISSUE, TOWELS 343487 312056 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 790.59 383426 6/5/2014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,050.00 LEASE CARTS 343696 515140001 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 350.00 LEASE CARTS 343698 515140002 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 315.28 LEASE CART 343697 5222140002 5423.6216. LEASE LINES 1,715.28 383426 6/5/2014 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION 1,048.43 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003719, 343553 110851 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 1,048.43 383427 6/5/2014 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 512.00., ANNUAL FIRE INSPECTION 343490 183072 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 512.00 383428 6/5/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 140.00 LIGHT BULBS 00001169 343371 15246511 =00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 163.20 LIGHT BULBS 00001169 343371 15246511 -00 5761.6406_ GENERALSUPPLIES 303.20 383429 6/6/2014 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Page- 25 Business Unit 50TH STREET GENERAL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF CARS GOLF CARS GOLF CARS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/312014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383429 6/6/2014 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING Continued... 357.09 REGISTRATION CARDS 343372 65059 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 357.09 383430 6/6/2014 134107 WENHAM, ROBYN 33.00 'TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 343554 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 33.00 383431 6/6/2014 134118 WERT, SANDY 21.00 CLASS' INSTRUCTOR 343555 NORDIC WALK 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 21.00 383432 6/6/2014 134164 WHITE, WILLIAM 120.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 343713 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 120.00 383433 6/6/2014 .101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 897.20 343430 361958 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 958.15 343614 362671 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 740.89 343615 362672 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,596.24 383434 6/612014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,586.56 343432 504124 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 121.12 343431 504371 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 234.24 343617 504891 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 793.84 343616 504893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 4,288.88 343755 504894 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,602.24 343756 504929 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 289.12- 343433 64853 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,337.76 383436 6/6/2014 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 2,779.61- CREDIT 343557 59264222 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,366.53 FUNGICIDE 343556 59266710 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 513.00 DROPLEX 00006147 343558 59337695 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 2,190.14 FUNGICIDE 00006147 343559. 59337696 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,290.06 383436 6/612014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,590.45 343441 1080176873 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLi' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/3/2014 10:36:57 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/5/2014 - 6/5/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383436 6/6/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 1,633.10 343434 10BO181717 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 226.26 343757 1080184381 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,491.03 343618 1080184382 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,225.25 343435 1080184395 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 73.15 343436 1080184396 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,514.99 343437 1080184404 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 90.30 343440 1080184406 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,056.46 343439 1080184407 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 221.70 343438 1080184408 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 13.55- 343444 2080041067 5822.5512 COST.OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 27.10- 343443 2080041074 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.582.44- 343442 2080042530 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING B.01- 343619 4080001660 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18,491.59 383437 6/612014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 148.80 343701 1090229376 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,205.95 343445 1090229629 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 221.40 343447 1090229630 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON:SELLING 129.00 343446 1090229801 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,609.00 343450 1090229802 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 130.50 343449 1090229803 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 343448 1090229804 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 250.00 343699 1090230853 5421.6514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 358.00 343700 1090231701 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,591.00 343760 1090233059 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 287.70 343761 1090233060 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,691.00 343758 1090233123 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.00 343759 1090233124 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 15,686.85 383439 6/6/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51.71 51- 4420190 -3 343503 413354955 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 25.91 51- 0160483 -1 343500 413434821 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 33.26 51- 0194596 -8 343507 413435285 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 26.10 51 -0223133 -2 343501 413436634 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 390.65 51- 4621797 -2 343506 413497172 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 20.58 51- 6541084 -2 343505 413530148 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 34.31 51- 8997917 -7 343502 413559584 9321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 72.23 51- 9770164 -7 343495 413568959 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount 383439 6/512014 21.45 138.61 157.35 1,057.66 1,445.93 87.83 148.35 34.31 350.26 6,553.42 131.43 20.00 1,329.55 7,133.22 19,264.12 383440 61512014 92.50 92.50 Supplier / Explanation 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 0010118404 -0 51- 0010166207 -2 51- 0193479-4 51- 5107681 -4 51- 5547446 -1 51- 6692497 -0 51- 8987646 -8 51- 8976004 -9 51- 9011854-4 51- 9603061 -0 51- 9608462 -5 51- 9770163 -6 51- 0010060454 -7 51- 6644819 -9 101631 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES 383441 6/6/2014 100613 AAA 5,936.07 LICENSE PLATES 5,936.07 679,798.72 Grand Total 343565 052814 5110.6564 343791 060314 1553.6260 6/312014 10:36:57 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description CITY OF EDINA - Continued... Council Check Register by GL LIGHT & POWER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary LIGHT & POWER 6/5/2014 — 6/5/2014 SENIOR CITIZENS PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 343498 413573875 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 343499 413576028 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 343493 413590905 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 343563 413669022 5111.6185 343560 413679751 1628.6185 343504 413692030 1460.6185 343496 413722477 1321.6165 343494 413724024 1321.6185 343492 413725054 5913.6185 343564 413731722 1552.6185 343491 413733705 5921.6185 343497 413738181 1321.6185 343562 413738450 5210.6185 343561 .413751475 5720.6185 343565 052814 5110.6564 343791 060314 1553.6260 6/312014 10:36:57 Page - 28 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Payment Instrument Totals Checks 673,079.91 A/PACH Payment 6,718.81 Total Payments 679,798.72 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/5/2014 6/5/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 307,797.50 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 5,729.06 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 104.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 19,833.44 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 15,267.80 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,078.59 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,783.36 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 90.95 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 42,143.66 05500 IC E AR ENA FU N D 35, 292.83 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 12,025.95 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 9,628.09 05800 LIQUOR FUND 182,558.71 05900 UTILITY FUND 23,567.34 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 157.35 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 936.72 09900 PAYROLL FUND 15,803.37 Report Totals 679,798.72 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poiydep and nrnror v irnael'ts (aj - 1511 A-[ A 6/3/2014 10:37:07 Page- 1 i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check - Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/1212014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 46 6/12/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 220.65 343792 43259000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 45.00 344583 43350100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 709.30 344345 43350200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 237.10 344585 43350300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 45.00 344347 43350400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 134.79 344584 6435400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 256.38 344582 90297100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 253.03 344346 90297200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 54.24 344348 ; 90297300 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,955.49 46 6/12/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS ` 21.51 WALLCLOCK 343849 OE- 357145 -1 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 658.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 344255 WO- 937827 -1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 344254 WO- 937840 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 99.62 INK CARTRIDGES 00003056 344257 WO- 938032 -1 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003657 344256 WO- 938036 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.00 NOTEBOOKS 344301 WO- 938382 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 952.03 47 6/1212014 104020 DALCO 59.00 DISINFECTANT 00001454 343857 2749768 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 69.90 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001068 343858 2750162 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 209.66 TOWELS, CAN LINERS 00001454 344308 2751451 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,287.45 SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 00001208 344310 2752208 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 88.00 TISSUES - 00001454 344309 2752209 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,714.01 48 6112/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 689.98 HYD MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00001730 344562 949056 -00 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS 87,558.91 GROUNDSMASTER 00005169 344330 950527 -00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 54.80 NUTS 00006152 344504 958067 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS .53.68 HOSEBARB 00006152 344505 956067 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 113.47 BRACKETS 00006153 344506 958088 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 86,470.84 383442 61612014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,064.01 BODY REPAIR 344215 642161 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,434.33 BODY REPAIR - 344216 645112 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,498.34 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 1 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING SENIOR CITIZENS HUMAN RESOURCES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC.PW BUILDING MOWING PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS, MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383442 6/6/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Continued... 383443 6/612014 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSE- KEVIN MEDZIS 344294 060414 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 383444 6/6/2014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 58.22 POSTAGE - 50TH & FRANCE 344295 060214 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFI N DING 1,251.93 POSTAGE - FRANCE AVE 344295 060214 01404.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 1,310.15 383445 6/12/2014 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 2,085.88 MONITOR SCREEN 344296 0140014 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,085.88 383446 .6112/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 99.60 344343 1789192 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 106.00 344344 1793178 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 122.00 344342 1793179 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 327.60 383447 6/12/2014 129468 ACME TOOLS 120.00 IMPACT DRIVER 00005301 343844 2640228 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 426.99 TOOLS 344458'. 2644168 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 26.39 REPAIR TAMPER 344459 2647770 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE_ 573.38 383448 6/12/2014 101166 AHEAD INC 32.00- CREDIT 344534 CRO194253 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 43.06 SWEATER 344533 INVO205899 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 11.06 383449 6/12/2014 112033 ALLDATA 1,500.00 SOFTWARE CONTRACT 344252 FW270363 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,500:00 383460 6/12/2014 103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 140.00 CAMERA REPAIR 343845 SVCINV15342 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 140.00 383451 6/12', 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383461 6/12/2014 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN Continued... 14.95 ART WORK SOLD 344413 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.95 383462 6/12/2014 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 207.28 344253 053114 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 283.04 344253 053114 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 570.81 344253 053114 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. G_ ENERAL 186.40 344253 053114 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 73.63 344253 053114 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 77.25 344253 053114 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 180.32 344253 053114 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,578.73 383463 6/12/2014 102171 ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES INC. 16,277.90 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 344460 131090514 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 16,277.90 - 383464 6/12/2014 134182 ANGELICA, MARION 78.00 ART WORK SOLD 344414 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 383466 6/12/2014 132127 .ANTOINE,TORA 47.00 TENNIS PROGRAM 344535 REFUNDS 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 70.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 344535 REFUNDS 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 117.00 383466 6/1212014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,065.90 FOOD 344461 405300519 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,065.90 383467 6/12/2014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 368.72 SPRINKLER SUPPLIES 344537 63816 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8.88 FITTINGS 344536 64118 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 377.60 383468 6/12/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 346.19 COFFEE 343847 1127704 1550.6406- GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 59.72 COFFEE 344462 429645 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 124.13 COFFEE 343846 9974784 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 530.04 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 637.00 CITY OF EDINA 344218 6/10/2014 12:53:30 5842.5514 879.00 Council Check Register by GL 344217 Page - 4 5862.5514 1,516.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 383461 6/12/2014 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383468 6/12/2014 25.00 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS Continued... 383469 611212014 114476 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 144.45 MONITORING SERVICE 344463 179459 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.30 MONITORING SERVICE 344464 179460 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 383463 6/12/2014 240.75 100638 BACHMAN'S 383460 6/1212014 243.14- 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 344299 052014 5422.6275 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RECYCLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COURSE BEAUTIFICATION TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONTINGENCIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 637.00 344218 53549 5842.5514 879.00 344217 53550 5862.5514 1,516.00 383461 6/12/2014 102673 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAGERS 25.00 REGISTRATION - SOLVEI WILMOT 344297 ANNUAL WORKSHOP 5952.6104 25.00 383462 6112/2014 100636 ASTLEFORD 469.70 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005104 343848 W92316 1553.6180 469.70 383463 6/12/2014 100638 BACHMAN'S - 243.14- CREDITONACCOUNT 344299 052014 5422.6275 365.88 JUNIPERS 00002044 344298 506207 5761.6620 122.74 383464 6/12/2014 134180 BALFANY, TIM 679.64 RAISED GARDEN BEDS 344300 SUPPLIES 1500.6103 679.64 383466 6/1212014 101343 BEHR, JASON 53.44 K9 BOARDING EXPENSE 344538 060114 4607.6406 53.44 383466 6/12/2014 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 170.30 ART WORK SOLD 344415 060514 5101.4413 170.30 383467 6/1212014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 186.95 COFFEE 344465 1176470 1552.6406 188.95 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RECYCLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COURSE BEAUTIFICATION TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONTINGENCIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383468 6/1212014 133926 BIX PRODUCE CO. Continued... 208.05 FOOD 344466 02891462 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 208.05 383469 6112/2014 101176 BLEDSOE, SARA 12.97 ART WORK SOLD 344416 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 12.97 383470 6/1212014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 43.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 344302 97467 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 43.14 383471 6/12/2014 116368 BOHN, KENDALL 23.27 ART WORK SOLD 344417 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 23.27 383472 6112/2014 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP 19,140.00 MAY 2014 FEES 344539 060514 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,140.00 383473 6/1212014 133323 BOWEN, BETSY 1 B.79 ART WORK SOLD 344418 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 18.79 383474 6/12/2014 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 352.04 COMPRESSOR FAN ASSEMBLY 00005370 343850 857360 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.06 MOTOR, RESISTOR 00005399 344303 858827 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 466.10 383476 6/12/2014 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 107.28 MEETING EXPENSE 344467 2349 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 107.28 383476 611212014 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page- 5 Business Unit GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES LEGAL SERVICES ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION 135.00 DOOR REPAIR 343851 525075S 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 135.00 383477 6/1212014 103996 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 3.87 ART WORK SOLD 344419 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.87 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/612014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383478 6/1212014 102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND Continued... 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/18/14 344247 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 383479 611212014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 460.60 MERCHANDISE 344540 925229745 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 722.16 344541 925232304 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 132.90- CREDIT 344544 925256496 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 79.74 344542 925256511 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 485.69 344543 925263753 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,615.29 383480 6/1212014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 120.57 OCE MAINTENANCE 344468 988232987 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 120.57 383481 6112/2014 119465 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 118.40 344469 00010717 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 834.90 343793 336411 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,956.45 344220 340833 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 51.05 344219 345076 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,960.80 383482 6/12/2014 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 109.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 344545 052914 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 109.95 383483 611212014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 50.57 9546705 -6 343852 9546705 -5/14 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 50.57 383484 6/12/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 59.63 344546 0146 -5/14 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 168.33 344546 0146 -5/14 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 169.75 344546 0146 -5/14 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 255.52 344546 0146 -5/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 280.81 344546 0146 -5/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 57.00 344546 0146 -5/14 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 37.26 344546 0146 -5/14 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 86.48 952 941 -1019 344470 1019 -5/14 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 109.55 952 826 -7398 344471 7398 -5/14 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMIW ION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383484 6/12/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 57.00 952 920 - 8632 344258 6632 -5/14 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 1,281.33 383485 6/12/2014 127227 CFA SOFTWARE INC. 2,995.00 CFA SOFTWARE SUPPORT & MAINT 344304 12458 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,995.00 383486 6/1212014 134203 CHAMPA, MADDY 20.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 344547 060914 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 20.16 383487 6/1212014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 6,121.33 2ND QTR LAB SERVICES 00001134 343853 053014 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 6,121.33 - 363488 6/12/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON _ 50.00 ATTORNEY FEES 344305 #001 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 50.00 - 383489 6/12/2014 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 655.67 XCEL BILLING - STORM LS 00001136 343854 5847 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 655.67 383490 6/1212014 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 1,736.00 MAY 2014 INSPECTION FEES 344472 6114 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INS_ PECTION& 1,736.00 383491 611212014 103040 CITY PAGES 291.66 . MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 344259 D10072083 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 344259 D10072083 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING - 344259 DID072083 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 875.00 383492 611212014 106693 CITYSPRINT 15.37 DELIVERY SERVICE 343655 31871 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADM_ INISTRATION 15.37 383493 611212014 121616 COATES ROOFING INC. 132.00 LEAK REPAIR 344473 1450. 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 132.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 8 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARKING RAMP POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION GENERALTURF CARE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTIO Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014. Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383493 6112/2014 121616 COATES ROOFING INC. Continued... 383494 6/12/2014 100692 "COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 215.52 344586 0116437818 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 164.32 344349 0128340114 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 379.84 383496 6/12/2014 134178 COLE, MARK 17.91 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 344306 5736 TUCKER 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND LANE 17.91 383496 6/12/2014 120433 COMCAST 90.85 8772 10 614 0164959 344474 164959 -5/14 5430.6186 TELEPHONE 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 344475 177449 -5/14 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 182.26 383497 6/12/2014 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 4,996.29 HOT MIX 344548 053114 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 4,996.29 383498 6112/2014 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LLC 39,976.00 WORKERS COMP FUNDING 344307 1750907 1550.6200 INSURANCE 39,976.00 383499 6112/2014 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 258.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 344476 7070202799 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 258.00 383600 6/12/2014 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 239.80 114 - 10014090 -3 344549 053114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 239.80 383601 6112/2014 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 4,757.20 SCADA SUPPORT 00001137 343856 10464 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,757.20 383502 6/12/2014 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE 168.00 BLACK DIRT 344477 060114 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 336.00 BLACK DIRT 344477 060114 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 168.00 BLACK DIRT 344477 060114 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 8 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARKING RAMP POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION GENERALTURF CARE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTIO R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary . 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383602 6/12/2014 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE Continued... 672.00 383603 602/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 70.70 344221 754675 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,666.05 344222 754676 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 73.80 344223 754679 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,320.05 344224 754680 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,130.60 383504 6/1212014 124367 DELANEY, ALICE 39.65 ART WORK SOLD 344420 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.65 383506 6112/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 270.00- GREASE GUN 00005297 343859 905076 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 168.18 WRENCH SET 00005298. 343861 905078 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.68 REPLACEMENT TOOLS 00005364 343860 905093 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.60 GASKET SCRAPER 00005391 343862 905552 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.76 WRENCH 00005364 343863 907526 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.94 CAR WASH BRUSHES 00005302 343864 907655 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 566.16 383606 611212014 100720 DEN NYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY . 68.00 BAKERY 344478 507317 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 93.86 344479 507772 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 76.00 344480 507773 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL - 46.52 344481 508264 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 284.38 383507 6112/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 578.46 110311893 344482 110311893 -5/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 576.46 383508 6112/2014 123996 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 3,497.72 REFUSE 344261 DT0000804315 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,239.81 REFUSE 344262 DT0000804316 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,082.96 REFUSE 344260 DT0000816511 4095.6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 6,820.49 383609 611212014 129167 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL i Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 „ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383509 6/1212014 129167 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC Continued... 74.38 LIQUOR STORE FLYERS MAILING 344483 6491 -01 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.38 LIQUOR STORE FLYERS MAILING 344483 6491 -01 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.39 LIQUOR STORE FLYERS MAILING 344483 6491 -01 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 223.15 " 383510 6/1212014 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 5920 CHOWEN AVE 344550 ED129659 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT _ 2,500.00 383511 6112/2014 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 6.50 ARTWORK SOLD 344421 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 6.50 383512 6112/2014 120696 DRAPER, LAURENE 52.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 344311 REIMBURSEMENT 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.31 - 383613 6/1212014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 320.00 PUBLIC WORKS OPEN AD 343866 103482 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37.24 PHN PUBLICATION 343865 106725 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 2,362.05 EDITION - EDINAADS 344312 107963 1130.6575 PRINTING 2,719.29 383614 6/12/2014 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 319.07 RUBBER SPLICE, HOLE SAW 00001172 343868 10860200 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 319.07 383615 6/12/2014 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25.00 ANNUAL MEETING - BENNEROTTE 343867 34572 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 25.00 383616 6/1212014 101666 EDINA CHORALE 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/16/14 344244 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 100.00 383517 6/1212014 100049 EHLERS • 1,390.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 344263 65004 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 344264 65005 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,390.00 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 10 Business Unit bU I h J I bELLINU YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS COMMUNICATIONS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES PIR DS REVENUES I . R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383618 6/1212014 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS Continued... 150.71 MANAGEMENT FEE 344265 053114 1160.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES FINANCE 150.71 383619 6/1212014 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 67.00 344587 W- 971143 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.00 383620 6/12/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 122.36 BATTERY 343872 1.4452064 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 284.31 BATTERIES 343874 1- ZO1326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 297.00 FREON 343870 69- 139545 1553.6565 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.42 OIL FILTERS 343869 69- 139546 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.88 ROTORS 343873 69- 139997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 347.03 COMPRESSOR ASSEMBLY 343871 70- 189391 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,219.00 383521 6/12/2014 100766 FEDEX 57.65 SHIPPING CHARGES 344313 2- 665 -78226 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - 57.65 383522 6/12/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 7,219.33 METERS 00001128 343875 0082297 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 7,219.33 383623 6/12/2014 134183 FERGUSON,_LISA J 50.05 ART WORK SOLD 344423 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.05 383624 6/12/2014 133267 FILBIN, SUSAN 27.30 ARTWORK SOLD 344424 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.30 383626 6/1212014 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 42.25 ARTWORK SOLD 344422 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.25 383626 6/12/2014 101476 FOOTJOY 130.23 SHOES 344551 5590883 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 75.79 SHOES 344552 5605709 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 38.51 SHIRT 344553 5611650 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA , Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383626 6/12/2014 101476 FOOTJOY Continued... ART WORK SOLD LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS. GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUBHOUSE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD PAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTIC' 244.53 383627 6/1212014 106372 FRONT AVENUE POTTERY & TILE 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 344425 060514 5101.4413 39.00 383628 6/12/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 344485 1006303591 5422.6201 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 344484 1006326278 5422.6201 30.00 383629 .6/12/2014 100776 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 2,375.00 TEE SHIRTS 344266 86892 1623.6406 2,375.00 383630 6112/2014 103186 GERTENS 18.98 MULCH 00001180 343876 312960/1 1552.6406 18.98 MULCH 00001200 343877 313179/1 1552.6406 18.98 MULCH 00001207 344487 313557/1 1552.6406 113.00 JUNIPERS 00001230 344486 314404/1 1644.6541 169.94 383631 6/12/2014 124641 GEYEN GROUP 347.34 CARPET CLEANING 344488 23600 5420.6230 347.34 383632 6/12/2014 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 57.79 R -91 PHONE 344267 5588200 1470.6188 57.79 383533 6/1212014 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 2,205.80 MAY 2014 SERVICE 00001142 343878 108445 5913.6103 2,205.80 383534 6/12/2014 133268 GORDON, KIM 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 344426 060514 5101.4413 16.25 383636 6/12/2014 - 101103 GRAINGER 336.48 PAINT 00001999 343880 9444428008 5913.6532 ART WORK SOLD LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS. GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUBHOUSE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD PAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTIC' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CL PERFORMANCE 6/23/14 344250 060114 CITY OF. EDINA 'PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 6/10/201412:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 100797 HAWKINS INC. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4,422.65 CHEMICALS 00001135 343887 3596356 5915.6586 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 WATER TREATMENT 3,993.96 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383536 6/12/2014 343889 101103 GRAINGER 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,601.45 Continued... 00001135 343890 230.58 FILTERS, VALVES 00001171 343881 9447431694 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 279.65 STEP STAND 00005294 343885 9449234914 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.28 DOOR HARDWARE 00001187 343882 9449234930 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 36.36 FANS FOR CABINETS 00001189 343883 9449234948 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 235.30 PAPER CUTTER, TAPE 00005299 343884 9449778241 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 269.60 NITRILE GLOVES 00001192 343886 9450116661 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 46.64 NITRILE GLOVES 00001210 344489 9453336746 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,535.89 383636 6112/2014 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 64.95 ALIGNMENT 343879 67928 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.95 383537 6/12/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 493.50 344350 167595 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 981.50 344226 167695 5862.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186.75 344225 167696 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,661.75 383538 6/12/2014 100766 GREUPNER, JOE 128.72 UMBRELLA FOR DECK 344490 060514 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 128.72 383639 6/1212014 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/19/14 344248 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 383540 6112/2014 123248 HARMONIC RELIEF 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/23/14 344250 060114 5760.6136 'PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 383541 6/1212014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,422.65 CHEMICALS 00001135 343887 3596356 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,993.96 CHEMICALS 00001135 343868 3596461 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,070.26 CHEMICALS 00001135 343889 3599743 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,601.45 CHEMICALS 00001135 343890 3600997 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 15,088.32 383542 6/12/2014 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 2,801.68 HYD PARTS 00001120 343891 C425133 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383642 6/12/2014 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Continued... 236.82 PVC PIPE, COUPLINGS 00001156 343892 C445540 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,038.50 383643 6/1212014 134176 HEELAN, KRISTIN 90.00 PROGRAM REFUND 344314 REFUND 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 PARKADMIN. GENERAL 90.00 . 383644 6/12/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 177.12 BEEF PATTIES 344491 025181 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 177.12 383646 6/12/2014 116367 HENGEMUHLE, TIM 198.24 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 344554 060914 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 198.24 383546 6112/2014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,370.00 TEMPO EMT REFRESHER COURSES 344315 34930 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT.`GENERAL 3,160.00 TEMPO EMT REFRESHER COURSES 344316 34932 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 344317 35076 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ' 8,005.08 383647 6/12/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,342.44 MAY 2014 BOOKING 344268 1000045996 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 1,342.44 383648 6/12/2014 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 763.20 RADIO FLEET FEE 344555 1000045198 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 344269 1000045964 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 344318 1000045965 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,063.20 383549 6/12/2014 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 168.00 MONITORS 00004322 344319 54359433 1130.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 168.00 MONITORS 00004322 344319 54359433 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 168.00 MONITORS 00004322 344319 54359433 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1,176.00 MONITORS 00004322 344319 54359433 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT. - CENT SERV GEN - MIS - 1,680.00 383660 6/12/2014 134184 HOENACK, MEG 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 344427 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER,, NUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383660 6/1212014 134184 HOENACK, MEG Continued... 7.80 383661 6/12/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,425.50 343794 704385 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,867.50 344227 705403 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,646.40 344351 705802 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,939.40 383662 6/1212014 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/15/14 344243 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 383663 6/1212014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 348.00 344228 19814 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 750.00 343795 19866 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,098.00 383664, 6/12/2014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 171.88 GALLONAGE STICKERS 00001966 343893 846822 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 171.88 383666 6/12/2014 131548. INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 364.72 DESK CHAIR 344320 IN0539528 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 364.72 CHAIR 343894 IN0539529 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 729.44 383566 6/12/2014 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 493.75 SHOULDER EMBLEMS 343895 31664 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 493.75 383667 6/12/2014 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 675.00 DRIVERS INSPECTION REPORTS 344270 64718 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 675.00 383668 6/1212014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 106.87 TOILET RENTAL 344492 75440 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 343897 75.688 1645.6182 RUBBISH.REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 343896 75689 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 209.87 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description Business Unit 383669 6/12/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 3,052.30 343798 2225400 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 343796 2225401 5822.5515 COST.OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,473.30 343797 2225411 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,611.47 344352 2225439 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 86.80 344354 2225440 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 49.10 344353 2225445 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 13,728.09 344357 2225447 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 36.00 344356 2225448 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 39.05 344355 2225449 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING. 888.80 344493 2229124 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 29,986.41 383660 6112/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 63.00 CABLE 00006128 344494 68270278 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE S GROUNDS 108.53 COUPLINGS 00006156 344495 68286637 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 171.53 383662 6/1212014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 549.48 343800 1860587 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,053.13 343799 1860590 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 704.41 343801 1860591 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 599.01 343802 1860592 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,699.25 343803 1860611 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,168.78 343804 1860613 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 972.83 344366 1867312 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,12105 344591 1867313 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,346.02 344360 1867315 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 110.21 344365 1867316 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,066.79 344589 1867317 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 307.50 344372 1867318 5862.5512 COST OF GOODSSOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.61 - 344367 1867323 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.67 344363 1867324 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,843.91 344361 1867329 5842,5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,643.65 344359 1867330 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,718.65 344362 1867331 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,169.88 .344364 1867332 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. YORK SELLING 5,879.18 344590 1867333 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,186.99 344588 1667334 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,575.64 344371 1867335 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.74 344369 1867336 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SEI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/1212014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383662 6112/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 7,459.33 344368 1867337 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 99.94 344370 1867338 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 338.95 344358 1867815 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 547.84 344592 1868755 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 215.21- 343805 619900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 58, 016.23 383563 6112/2014 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI 7.80 ARTWORK SOLD 344428 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.80 383664 6/1212014 102603 JONAS, LENORE 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 344429 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 23.40 383566 6112/2014 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 92.30 ARTWORK SOLD 344430 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES_ 92.30 383566 6112/2014 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 139,235.80 PARKING.RAMP DESIGN 344321 5764984 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 139,235.80 383667 6112/2014 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC. 244.85 ROCK 344496 236689 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 244.85 383668 6/12/2014 133469 KRUEGER, JASON 14.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 344556 060914 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 14.00 383569 6112/2014 129932 LABOVITZ, ANNE 79.95 ARTWORK SOLD 344432 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 79.95 383670 6/12/2014 134186 LACER, MARY 50.70 ARTWORK SOLD 344431 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.70 383671 6/1212014 134201 LACOE, TARA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/612014 - 6/1212014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383671 6/12/2014 134201 LACOE, TARA Continued... 105.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 344557 GOLF LESSONS 5401.4602 LESSONS 105.00 383672 6/12/2014 124611 LARSCO INC. 582.05 VALVES, KITS 00001987 343898 3224 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page- 18 Business Unit GOLF REVENUES WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 582.05 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN r REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 383673 6/12/2014 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 654.67 BITS, SCREWS, STOCK BOLTS 00005354 344271 9302461136 1553.6530 91.63 DUST CAPS 00005354 343900 9302467350 1553.6585 415.36 HARDWARE 00005392 343899 9302475056 1553.6530 38.31 THREADED ROD 00005300 343901 9302482996 1553.6530 439.59 SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS 00005396 344322 9302489051 1553.6530 1,639.56 383674 611212014 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 559.32 GRAVEL 344497 053114 5422.6517 670.18 SAND 344497 053114 5422.6517 1,229.50 383575 6/12/2014 103396 LENT, WILLIAM 554.73 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING 344558 SPRING 2014 1600.4390.21 554.73 383676 6/12/2014 134186 LETOURNEAU, KATHLEEN 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 344433 060514 5101.4413 26.00 383577 6/12/2014 101466 LIEBER, JUDY 162.50 ART WORK SOLD 344434 060514 5101.4413 162.50 383678 6/12/2014 133624 LINDEMANN, TRISTEN 22.07 ARTWORK SOLD 344435 060514 5101.4413 22.07 383679 6/1212014 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 69.18 REIMBURSE FOR INK 344323 060514 1400.6406 69.18 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page- 18 Business Unit GOLF REVENUES WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN r REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARKADMIN. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/1212014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383680 6/12/2014 100867 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. Continued... 540.35 UNDERBODY LIFT 00005363 344272 00054277 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 540.35 383581 6112/2014 100868 LOGIS 505.00 344273 36562 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,342.00 344273 36562 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,500.00 344273 38562, DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,829.00 344273 38562 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,492.00 344273 38562 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,829.00 344273 36562 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,689.00 344273 38562 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,707.00 344273. 36562 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 28,893.00 383682 6/12/2014 134202 LOWE, JENNY 50.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 344559 JR GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 50.00 383683 6/1212014 101792 LUBE -TECH 110.00 USED OIL FILTER PICKUP 343902 2375019 1553.6564 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.00 383684 6/1212014 100443 LUCHT, PETE 199.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 344498 060514 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 199.95 383685 6/12/2014 134179 LW GALLUP & CP RALEIGH 30.38 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 344324 5932 GROVE ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.38 383686 6112/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 876.88 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 344326 S -14266 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 876.88 383587 6/1212014 127698 MADD - MN 175.00 MADD CRASH CAR 344325 MAY 13 -15 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 175.00 383688 .6/12/2014 131686 MAILFINANCE INC. 194.97 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 344327 N4716478 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/612014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383688 6/12/2014 131686 MAILFINANCE INC. Continued... 194.97 383689 6112/2014 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 120.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 344274 060314 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 120.40 383690 6/12/2014 131882 MCGUIRE, KIM 99.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 344560 JR LEAGUE 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES 99.00 383691 6/12/2014 134187 MCMAHON, MARY JO 102.38 ART WORK SOLD 344436 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 102.38 383692 6/1212014 105767 MCPHERSON, KAREN 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 344437 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 48.75 383693 6/12/2014 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 432.00 ST. PAUL SAINTS TRIP 344328 JUNE 17 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 432.00 383694 6/12/2014 101483 MENARDS 99.88 SWIVEL CASTERS 00001194 343903 57566 1642.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 14.97 CHISEL 00001193 343905 57585 1301.6556 TOOLS - ,. 322.46 DOOR POSTS, FASCIA, TRIM OOOD1202 343904 57764. 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ' 399.65 SHRINK WRAP 00001133 343906 58042 5939.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 53.29 PAINT SUPPLIES 00001220 344499 58084 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 890.25 383696 611212014 114194 MESSACAR, BETTY 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 344436 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 16.25 383696 6/12/2014 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 365,522.72 SEWER SERVICE 344275 0001035146 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 365,522.72 383697, 6/12/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 879.01 VEHICLE REPAIRS 344276 241170 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 20 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS GOLFREVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE ART CENTER REVENUES SEWER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT. 'ATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383697 6/12/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 140.07 A/C HOSE 00005358 343907 489139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,019.08 383698 6/1212014 104660 MICRO CENTER 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 21 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.99 CABLES 344277 - 4997869 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 18.98 AV SUPPLIES 343908 5031281 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 344501 928024335 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.09 WINDOW CLEANING 344500 928024336 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING 344502 928024675 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 42.81 33.97 . 383699 6112/2014 122473 MILLER, CHICHI 84.50 ART WORK SOLD 344439 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 29966 1628.6103 84.50 270.34 383600 6/12/2014 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 383604 6/12/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 250.00 INVESTIGATOR EXAM 344503 2654 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 116.69 LIFTARM 00005365 250.00 0104792 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES., 383601 6112/2014 HYD VALVE 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 0104870 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 12,413.45 WATER PURCHASE 344278 431 - 0005.300 -6/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 383606 6112/2014 14 12,413.45 178.00 SUMMER MUSIC CARDS & POSTERS 383602 6/12/2014 2611.6575 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 51.00 ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 344501 928024335 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.09 WINDOW CLEANING 344500 928024336 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING 344502 928024675 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MUSIC IN EDINA' ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 42.81 383603 6/1212014 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 270.34 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 344329 29966 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 270.34 383604 6/12/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 116.69 LIFTARM 00005365 343909 0104792 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES., 56.41 HYD VALVE 344279 0104870 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 173.10 383606 6112/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 178.00 SUMMER MUSIC CARDS & POSTERS 343911 15520 2611.6575 PRINTING 51.00 WOW POSTERS 343910 15521 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 229.00 SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MUSIC IN EDINA' ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 6/12/2014 VERNON SELLING 104360 NIKE USA INC. CITY OF EDINA .YORK SELLING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 68.71 MERCHANDISE 344563 Council Check Register by GL 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.50 MERCHANDISE 344565 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 146.94 STAFF SHIRTS 344564 960570046 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 411.14 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383606 6/12/2014 383611 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET Continued... 383606 6112/2014 134194 MOLEVER, CATHY STEELTUBE 00005395 343912 289301 70.00 GOLF BAG REPLACEMENT 344561 060514 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 611212014 70.00 383607 6/12/2014 344441 104766 MONROE, MICHAEL 13.00 800.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 344341 060214 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 800.00 6/1212014 134188 NUGENT, STEVE 383608 6112/2014 129684 NELSON, ANNETTE ART WORK SOLD 344442 060514 10.73 ART WORK SOLD 344440 060814 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD 6/1212014 10.73 383609 6/12/2014 344280 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 658.75 383610 6/12/2014 VERNON SELLING 104360 NIKE USA INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .YORK SELLING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 68.71 MERCHANDISE 344563 960358858 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.50 MERCHANDISE 344565 960570045 - 146.94 STAFF SHIRTS 344564 960570046 411.14 MERCHANDISE 344566 960615019 669.29 383611 6/12/2014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 95.00 STEELTUBE 00005395 343912 289301 95.00 383612 611212014 131662 NOVAK, BERNADINE 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 344441 060514 13.00 383613 6/1212014 134188 NUGENT, STEVE 286.94 ART WORK SOLD 344442 060514 286.94 383614 6/1212014 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 EAP SERVICES - JUNE 2014 344280 3651 658.75 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 22 Business Unit RANGE MUSIC IN EDINA ART CENTER REVENUES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .YORK SELLING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -'PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1553.6530 . REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE'SHARED SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 616/2014 - 6/1212014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383614 6/12/2014 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE Continued... 383615 6/12/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 369.02 CHAIN 00005268 343913 538700 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 116.47 CHAIN 00005398 344331 539395 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 485.49 383616 6/12/2014 102266 OLSON, TIM 373.79 UNIFORM PURCHASE 343914 060214 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 373.79 383617 6/12/2014 134008 PANDORA MEDIA INC. 333.33 WEB STREAMING 344507 SIN109706 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 333.33 WEB STREAMING 344507 SIN109706 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 333.34 WEB STREAMING 344507 SIN109706 5662.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,000.00 383618 6/12/2014 129486 PAPCO INC. 42.46 CARPET CLEANER 343915 85572 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 42.46 383619 6/12/2014 129614 PAPER, ELIZABETH 4.55 ART WORK SOLD 344443 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 4.55 383620 6112/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 162.90 343806 6450354 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6,916.50 344230 8450952 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,454.42 344232 8450953 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 972.00 344231 8451333 -IN 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,388.32 344374 8451337 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 16,894.14 383621 6H212014 100846 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 539.91 344509 00402101 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 338.64 344508 00402118 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 177.04 344510 00402126 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 258.00 344375 00544547 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,313.59 383622 6/12/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page- 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 6/12/2014 CITY OF EDINA 100119 PING 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL 51.28 Page- 24 344567 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 51.28 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 383624 6/1212014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383622 6112/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 42.25 ART WORK SOLD Continued... 060514 4.48 343807 2610945 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 162.24 343809 2610947 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 415.25 343810 2610950 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 2,486.26 343808 2610957 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .37 344377 2615304 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,900.77 344380 2615308 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 344379 2615309 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 856.95 344381 2615310 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 348.37 344378 2615311 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,084.17 344593 2615312 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 853.19 344376 2615313 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 814.35 344594 2615314 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE VERNON SELLING - 383623 6/12/2014 100119 PING 51.28 CLUB REPAIR 344567 12296591 51.28 383624 6/1212014 133460 PITSCHKA, CHARLES 42.25 ART WORK SOLD 344444 060514 42.25 383626 6/12/2014 100968 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 343916 4208171 44.89 383626 6/12/2014 119146 PLYMAT, AMY 30.55 ART WORK SOLD 344445 060514 30.55 383627 6/1V2014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 100.00 NEIGHBORHOOD MAILING 344511 060514 100.00 383628 6/1212014 126979 PRECISE MRM LLC 5440.6406 5101.4413 7411.6103 5101.4413 1120.6575 800.00 GPS DATA PLAN 344568 IN200- 1002152 1318.6406 800.00 383629 6/12/2014 134189 RATHAI, TERRA 27.30 ART WORK SOLD 344446 060514 5101.4413 GENERALSUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD PRINTING GENERALSUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART CENTER REVENUES PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES ADMINISTRATION . SNOW & ICE REMOVAL .ART CENTE,, ENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc-No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383629 6/12/2014 134189 RATHAI, TERRA Continued... 27.30 383630 6/12/2014 134071 RED YARN 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/17/14 344246 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 383631 611212014 126936 REINDERS INC. 1,159.12 HERBICIDE 00006250 344512 3026163 -00 5431.6545 CHEMICALS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 5,150.00 FERTILIZER 00001167 344281 3026174 -00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 6,309.12 383632 6/12/2014 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 109.90 344233 IND001134 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 109.90 383633 6112/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 156.50 BUSINESS CARDS 344282 81445 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 106.50 BUSINESS CARDS 343917 61557 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 263.00 383634 6112/2014 133765 RONNING, ERIK 91.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 344447 060514 5111.610.3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 91.00 383636 6112/2014 134190 ROSEBEAR, KATHRYN 44.85 ART WORK SOLD 344448 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 44.85 383636 6/1212014 124809 RPU INC. 695.00 SUMP INSTALL- RESTORATION 343918 1565 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 695.00 383637 6/12/2014 134196 RUTZEN, NIKOLE 40.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 344569 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 40.00 383638 6/1212014 101963 S &S TREE SPECIALISTS 2,080.00 GRIND /HAUL WOOD WASTE 344283 907873502 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES &MAINTENANCE 2,080.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6110/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383639 6/12/2014 134173 SAFE -FAST INC. Continued... 322.20 SAFETY VESTS 00001072 344284 INV139547 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 322.20 383640 6/12/2014 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 105.40 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 343919 R000071623 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.40 383641 6/12/2014 132287 SALMEN, ANNE 64.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 344570 REFUND 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 64.00 383642 6/12/2014 103278 SCHATTAUER, JIM 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/24/14 344251 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 383643 6/12/2014 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 32.50 ART WORK SOLD 344449 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.50 383644 6/12/2014 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/17/14 344245 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 383646 6112/2014 101380 L SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA • 150.80 ART WORK SOLD 344450 060514 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 150.80 363646 6/12/2014 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 51.24 PAINT 00006144 344513 1653 -8 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 51.24 ' 383647 6/17/2014 126818 SHORROCK, CAROL 35.75 ARTWORK SOLD 344451 060514 5101.4413. ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 383648 6/12/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 412.50 EDINA IQS SIGNS 344514 7859 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 412.50 ' 383649 6/17' 4 119,422 SIZER, CORA LEE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 383649 6/12/2014 119422 SIZER, CORA LEE - 30.55 ART WORK SOLD 344452 060514 5101.4413 30.55 383660 611212014 134176 SKANSE, ERIKA 40.00 PLAYGROUND PROG REFUND 344335 REFUND 1600.4390.01 40.00 383661 6/12/2014 133014 SOCCER-SHOTS - 848.00 SOCCER PROGRAM 344285 EDINA PARK & 1624.6103 REC 848.00 383662 6/12/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 217.00 343812 1165074 5822.5513 144.50 343813 1165075 5822.5513 714.84 343815 1165076 5822.5512 10,565.10 344388 1165082 5842.5512 4,930.38 343814 1165067 5862.5512 337.00 343811 1166583 5822.5513 4,332.75 344385 1167733 5842.5513 3,582.54 344383 1167734 5842.5512 80.50 344384 1167735 5842.5513 3,720.00 344234 1167736 5862.5513 1,551.13 344386 1167737 5862.5512 .50 344387 1167738 5862.5512 188.41 344389 1168343 5842.5512 1,652.50 344595 1169025 5842.5513 2,113.02 343816 165077 5822.5512 34,130.17 383663 6/12/2014 110977 SOW, ADAMA 120.90 ART WORK SOLD 344453 060514 5101.4413 120.90 383664 6112/2014 129891 SPACK CONSULTING 6,860.00 SOUTHDALE OFFICE TRAFFIC STUDY 344571 2382 1140.6103 6,860.00 383666 6112/2014 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 18.85 ART WORK SOLD 344454 060514 5101.4413 Subledger Account Description Continued... ARTWORK SOLD PLAYGROUND, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6110/2014 12:53:30 Page - 27 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES PARKADMIN. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383666 6/12/2014 102698. _SPOONER, ANNE Continued... 18.85 383666 6/12/2014 101004 ' SPS COMPANIES 6.29 GASKETS 00001234 344515 S2914771.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6.29 383667 6/1212014 103668 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/22114 344249 060114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 75.00 - 383668 6/1212014 134181 STANCHFIELD, SHELLY 47.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 344332 REFUND 160D.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 47.00 383669 6/12/2014 134193 STARK, PATRICK - 22.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 344516 060314 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 22.96 - 383660 6112/2014 134200 STASNEY, GORDON C 29.42 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 344572 5808 OAKLAWN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 29.42 383661 6/12/2014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 32.04 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 344573 060514 5424.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES RANGE 110.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 344573 060514 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 142.04 383662 6/1212014 101016 STREICHERS 99.99 BOOTS 00003746 344286 11093088 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 99.99 363663 6/1212014 106874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. _ 369.40 TIRES 00005211 343920 10124826 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES • EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 369.40 383664 6/12/2014 102140 . SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 357.30 GOLF BAGS 344574 173224 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6.16- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 344575 CREDIT 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 351.14 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 344520 00771966 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 809.00 344517 825047 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 850.00 344518 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 34.30 344519 826160 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383664 6/12/2014 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 826797 5862.5514 Continued... 383665 6/12/2014 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 626798 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 47.20 2,000.00 OSSI LICENSE FEES - RICHFIELD 344333 82133 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 7,148.15 640.00 CAD PROJ MGMT- RICHFIELD 911 344334 82337 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 383670 6/12/2014 2,640.00 383666 6112/2014 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 131859 SUNSTROM, INGRID 2014 - 116157 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 89.70 ARTWORK SOLD 344455 060514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD YORK SELLING 330.00 89.70 344287 2014 - 116157 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 383667 6/12/2014 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 383671 6/12/2014 375.00 MOVIE RENTAL 344336 DB1931524 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER 176.00 PARK BOARD MEETING MINUTES 375.00 M20549 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 383668 6/12/2014 343921 134191 TANGLETOWN GARDENS 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 196.00 ART COMM MEETING MINUTES 72.00 ART WORK SOLD 344456 060614 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 808.00 72.00 383669 6112/2014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 29 Business Unit E911 E911 ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ART CENTER REVENUES 349.00 344520 00771966 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 809.00 344517 825047 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 850.00 344518 826159 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 34.30 344519 826160 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 149.10 344391 826796 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 26.15- 344392 826797 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,935.70 344390 626798 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 47.20 344521 827536 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,148.15 383670 6/12/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 344287 2014 - 116157 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 344287 2014 - 116157 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 344287 2014 - 116157 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 383671 6/12/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 176.00 PARK BOARD MEETING MINUTES 344289 M20549 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 436.00 5/20/14 COUNCIL MINUTES 343921 M20550 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 196.00 ART COMM MEETING MINUTES 344288 M20551 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 808.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/1012014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 — 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383671 6112/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. Continued... 383672 6/1212014 133908 TINCHER, JAMES 1,250.00 BAL DUE - WORKSHOP 344576 1050 -02 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,250.00 383673 6/1212014 101474 TITLEIST 112.78 GOLF BALLS 344577 2778812 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP . PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 112.78 383674 6/12/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. .559.20 344596 406892 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 981.00 344393 907869 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,540.20 383676 6/1212014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 63.44 ARGON 00006154 344522 10026620 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 63.44 383676 6/12/2014 104064 TRANS,UNION LLC 10.30 BACKGROUND CHECKS 344578 05417550 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.30 383677 6112/2014 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 112.25 MAY 2014 SERVICE 343922 269634 -6/14 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.25 383678 6112/2014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 32.40 BREAKER 00005353 344579 TI23328 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. 32.40 383679 6/12/2014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 304.20 SEED AND MULCH 344524 32384 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 940.00 GRASS SEED 00001217 344523 32398 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 1,244.20 383680 6112/2014 131967 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. _ 1,700.00 BATTING CAGE NETS 00001943 344290 150 - 0008179 -01 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 99.99 BASEANCHOR 344525 150 - 0008563 -01 1642.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 153.96 HOME PLATES, LINER 00001041 343923 1501 - 001932 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,953.95 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 501.25 CITY OF EDINA 383686 6/12/2014 Council Check Register by GL 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 293.25 344396 16580 616/2014 - 6/12/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383680 6/12/2014 131967 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 6/12/2014 Continued... 383681 6/12/2014 106811 UPPER MIDWEST COMMUNITY POLICING INST 15.00 TRAINING -AARON WHITE 344337 1215' 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1553.6260 15.00 62.00 383682 6/12/2014 101908 US FOODS 383688 611212014 196.92 CUST43805514 344526 060114 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 350.30 CUST 43B05514 344526 060114 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5511.6182 2,514.08 CUST 43B05514 344526 060114 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,061.30 383689 6/1212014 383683 6/12/2014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 132372 VERIFIED CREDENTIALS 50.00 BACKGROUND CHECK 344291 222743 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50.00 466.62 383684 6/1212014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 644.11 OCCUPANCY SENSORS 00001197 344292 8319387 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES 644.11 383686 6/1212014 119464 VINOCOPIA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 31 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL GRILL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 146.50- 344395 0098658 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 529.00 344394 0100084 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 116.75 344597 0100089 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION 501.25 383686 6/12/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 293.25 344396 16580 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 293.25 383687 6/12/2014 104106 WAACK, SUSAN 62.00 LICENSE PLATE FEE 344580 REIMBURSE 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 62.00 383688 611212014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 32.19 RUBBISH REMOVAL 344527 6919148- 2282 -6 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 32.19 383689 6/1212014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 466.62 LEAK LOCATES 00001139 343924 5119 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 466.62 YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register by GL 935.00 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 344528 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 47090.6710 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 935.00 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 YORK SELLI Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 383689 6/12/2014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. Continued... 383690 6/12/2014 134177 WECHTER, JOHN ART WORK SOLD 344457 148.51 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 344338 7009 LYNMAR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND LANE 383691 6/12/2014 50TH ST SELLING 103219 WENDEL SGN ARCHITECTURE INC. VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 935.00 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 344528 339711 47090.6710 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 935.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLI 383692 6112/2014 134192 WILLIAMS, DAISY 24.70 ART WORK SOLD 344457 060514 5101.4413 24.70 383693 611212014 102133 WILSON SPORTING GOODS . 1,000.00 GOLF CLUBS 344581 4515800776 5440.5511 1,000.00 383694 6/1212014 101033, WINE COMPANY, THE 520.25 343817 362670 -00 5822.5513 468.40 344397 363173 -00 5842.5513 1,274.15 344398 363303 -00 5862.5513 2,262.80 383696 6112/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 121.12 343818 504890 5822.5513 89.12 344400 505842 5862.5513 1,654.56 344401 505844 5842.5513 5,324.49 344399 505845 5862.5513 7,189, 29 383696 6/12/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 820.65 344409 1080184383 5862.5512 1,528.36 344410 1080184394 5862.5512 153.79 344408 1080184397 5862.5512 226.26 343822 1080184398 5822.5512 73.15 343819 1080184401 5822.5515 737.90 343820 1080184402 5822.5513 226.26 344412 1080184403 5842.5512 10,244.30 344411 1080184405 5842.5512 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Page - 32 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK.SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 33 Council'Check Register by Invoice.& Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date 383696 6112/2014 383697 611212014 383698 6/12/2014 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 343826 1090233122 769.54 343821 1080185814 4,139.86 344407 1080187182 3,432.12 344235 1080187183 679.80 344236. 1080187304 451.15 344404 1080187307 4,180.80 344402 1080187308 4,714.15 344403 1080187309 73.15 344405 1080187310 1,794.15 344406 1080187311 34,245.39 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 3,131.70 344242 1090233121 172.20 343826 1090233122 5,079.60 343823 1090233125 369.00 343825 1090233126 2,150.00 343824 1090233127 45.60 344237 1090233774 4,557.80 344240 1090233775 174.60 344241 1090233776 3,441.40 344239 1090234513 196.80 344238 1090234514 4,134.40 344600 1090237173 424.50 344602 1090237174 55.00 344601 1090237175 2,696.67 344598 1090237176 324.00 344599 1090237177 26,953.27 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,788.50 YORK TRAFFIC STUDY 344529 3 -01686 -510 1,788.50 383700 6/12/2014 2,204.95 29,911.11 34.32 37.39 556.96 2;179.52 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 4159265 -8 51- 4621797 -2 51- 8102668 -0 51- 0010103585 -7- 51- 4827232 -6 51- 5634814 -2 Account No Subledger Account Description 7411.6185 Continued... 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COSTOF GOODS SOLD BEER' 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING. YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PLANNING 343835 413655853 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 343834 413638499 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 343828 413875757 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 343833 413911239 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 343832 414016911 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 343830 414027914 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/10/2014 12:53:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/6/2014 - 6/12/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 383700 6/12/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 97.21 51- 5938955 -6 343829 414035924 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 312.60 51- 6046826 -0 343827 414038524 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 512.53 51- 9251919 -0 343836 414086990 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 158.13 51- 9337452 -8 343831 414087507 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,280.27 51 -6979948 -4 343837 414229294 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,474.29 51- 6979948 -4 343837 414229294 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,547.06 51- 6979948 -4 343837 414229294 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 320.79 51- 9422326 -6 343841 414256398 1322.6165 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 25.91 514151897 -6 343842 414352093 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22,937.69 514888627 -1 343839 414364839 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS. 1,768.48 514966303 -6 344340 414366522 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 510.61 51- 6137136 -8 343843 414382037 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 292.02 51- 6229265 -9 343838 414382226 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 31.49 51- 7567037 -0 343840 414399056 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 6,614.12 51- 0837548 -4, 344531 414467110 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 375.03 51- 6121102 -5 344530 414597941 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,491.19 51- 6840050 -6 344532 414741467 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 77,673.67 383701 6/12/2014 101672 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC - 528.00 TRACTOR BRUSH 00005116 344293 0149847 -IN 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 528.00 383702 6/12/2014 134174 ZUNG, ELIZABETH 40.00 PLAYGROUND PROG REFUND 344339 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 40.00 1,209,941.83 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,116,849.46 A/PACH Payment 93,092.37 Total Payments 1,209,941.83 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/6/2014 6/12/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 196,031.03 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,640.00 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 978.00 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,390.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 166,805.74 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 87,558.91 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,641.47 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 37.39 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 556.96 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 18,699.07 05500 IC E AR E NA FU N D 23, 250.69 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,578.41 05800 LIQUOR FUND 256,448.00 05900 UTILITY FUND 440,721.60 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,967.10 05950 RECYCLING FUND 25.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,612.46 Report Totals 1,209,941,83 We confirm to. the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies ,anti 6/10/2014 12:53:41 Page - 1 o1Le To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M Iv. C. From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Communications Services Action Requested: Approve attached Master Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin Healthcare System, and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board for Planning and Coordinating Delivery of Emergency Communications Services and authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign agreement. Information / Background: This cooperative agreement is needed to define the rights and responsibilities of the Parties and the MESB with respect to the cooperative and coordinated procurement, construction, implementation, operation and maintenance of emergency communications services and to provide for the inclusion of other metropolitan PSAPs in the future. This agreement was developed and negotiated over the past year and recently finalized by all parties. Legal counsels for all parties have reviewed the proposed agreement. Attachments: •. Emergency Communications Services Master Cooperative Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 MASTER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING AND' COORDINATING DELIVERY OF EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered 'into by and between Allina Health System d/b /a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare, System, Inc. d/b /a Hennepin County Medical Center (collectively, the "Parties "), which own and operate individual Public Safety Answering Points ( "PSAPs "), and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board ( "MESB "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the MESB was established to facilitate the plan ng and coordinate the delivery of emergency communications services including E6-1 -1 and emerging services such as next generation NG9 -1 -1; and WHEREAS, the MESB has been investigating and: evaluating suitable strategies to support regional public safety applications and their: integration among metropolitan area PSAPs; and WHEREAS, metropolitan area PSAPs yy��iif require equipment and /or significant software upgrades to their existing emergencyr mmunications services in the, future; and WHEREAS, the PSAPs which require emergency communications services equipment and /or significant software upgrades will benefit financially and /or operationally from a cooperative, and WHEREAS, there 74e opportunities, through shared procurements, to contain aggregate costs, enhan a PSAP interoperability, improve intra -PSAP and inter -PSAP backup processes, and offer best value; and WHEREAS, the MESB has the expertise to serve as Contract Manager /Fiscal Agent, on behaff of the other Parties to this Agreement, who own and operate the PSAPs and engage in shared procurements; and WHEREAS, the Parties and the MESB are all "governmental units" as that term is used in Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, subdivision 1 (which includes nonprofit hospitals licensed under §§ 144.50 to 144.56 as "governmental units "), and are authorized under that statute to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements_ hereinafter set forth, the Parties and the MESB agree as follows: Page 1 of 14 ARTICLE 1 PURPOSE 1.01 The purpose of this Agreement is'to define the. rights and obligations of the Parties and the MESB with respect to the cooperative and coordinated procurement, construction, implementation, operation, and maintenance of emergency communications services and to provide for the inclusion of other metropolitan PSAPs in the future. ARTICLE -2 COOPERATION 2.01 The Parties and the MESB will cooperate and use -reasonable to ensure that the various provisions of this Agreement are fulfilled. Tie Parties and the MESB agree in good faith to undertake the resolution of,.di.sputes, if any, in an equitable and timely manner and in accordance with'the provisions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS / 3.01 "Ancillary Agreement" means an attacl reient to this document that describes the Terms and Conditions by which two o*,emore Parties facilitate procurements and manage the ongoing maintenance � /or licensing of those procurements. 3.02 "Contract Manager /Fiscal Agent" means an entity responsible for acting as agent for the Parties with r�ppect to vendor contracts. 3.03 "Emergency Commun cations Services Committee (Committee)" means the governing body creed under Article 8. 3.04 "Group Procurement" means two or more PSAPs are making a joint procurement..-6f a Shared /Hosted emergency communications services system. 3.05 "Indiviloal Procurement" means a PSAP is acting independently in making an emergency communications services procurement. 3.07 "Master Cooperative Agreement" means this document that establishes and confirms the governance relationship among the Parties and the MESB: 3.08 "Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (MESB)" means the organization that currently oversees and manages emergency communications services for the nine - county metropolitan area and the City of Minneapolis. 3.09 "Ownership Percentage" means the percentage of each Party's indivisible ownership of any Common Equipment as defined and described in the respective Page 2 of 14 Ancillary Agreement. 3.10 "Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP)" means a communications facility operated on a 24 -hour basis which first receives 911 calls from persons in a 911 service area and which may, as appropriate, directly dispatch public safety services or extend, transfer; or, relay 911 calls to appropriate public safety agencies. For purposes of this Agreement, "PSAP" means PSAP and /or Secondary PSAP (definition below). 3.11 "Secondary Public Safety Answering Point' means a communications facility that: (1) is operated, on a 24 -hour basis, in which a minimum of three public safety answering points (PSAPs) route calls for post- dispatch or pre - arrival instructions; (2) receives calls directly from medical facilities to reduce call volume at the PSAPs,and (3) is able to receive 911 calls routed to it from a PSAP when the PSAP is unable to receive or answer 911 calls. 3.12 "System Owners Group (SOG)" means the governing-'body created by an Ancillary Agreement. 3.13 "Vendor" .means an equipment, software,. license; and /or service provider for procurements identified by Ancillary Agreements': ARTICL��4 ANCILLARY AGREEMENTS TO4HIS MASTER AGREEMENT ill Agreements to this Master Agreement that represent 4.01 There may be Ancillary g p group or individual procurements of emergency communications equipment, hardware, software, licenses; and /or,other related services. 4.02 Each Ancillary Agreement will include the Parties making the procurement. 4.03 Each Ancillary Agreement will include additional Terms and Conditions as well as cost allocations "between the parties and ongoing maintenance related to the equipment and /or services being procured. % ARTICLE 5 TERM 5.01 This Agreement shall take effect upon execution by the Parties, and its term shall be indefinite. ARTICLE 6 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES 6.01 Each Party shall be responsible for its allocated share of costs of any common equipment or common services as set forth in the Ancillary Agreements and Page 3 of 14 respective agreements with the Vendors. 6.02 Each Party shall be responsible for its PSAP equipment and related software, licenses and 'services costs, as set forth in the Ancillary Agreements and respective agreements with Vendors. 6.03 Each Party shall solely own its PSAP equipment as described by the Ancillary Agreements. Each PSAP shall be responsible for its back -up and disaster recovery strategy, including cost of hardware, software and licenses. ARTICLE 7 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MESB 7.01 The Parties may in any Ancillary'Agreement designate'the MESB as the Parties' Contract Manager /Fiscal Agent ( "Contract Manager"), with Pb limited roles and responsibilities identified herein and in the Ancillary Agreement. 7.02 All contracts entered into solely by the Contract Manager pursuant to authorization granted in an Ancillary Agreement shall clearly stipulate that the MESB is not an owner of the delivery of emergency communication' ommunicate n's services equipment, software, or licenses, but is acting on behalf of the Parties pursuant to delegation of authority under this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreements. 7.03 When signing a contract in its cap city as the Contract Manager, the MESB signatory shall be the MESB Chair rson or a duly authorized designee. 7.04 The Contract Manager shall serve as the Fiscal Agent for the projects as defined and described by the Ancilla4 Agreements, and shall perform all duties consistent with those . required of a Fiscal Agent, including, but not limited to: accounting for all :funding, revenues, invoices, and payments, to the extent set forth in the Ancillary Agreements 7.05 The Contract Menager shall act on behalf of the Parties in communicating with the Equipment,.,, Vendor and Maintenance Vendor regarding contracting issues, consistent with the direction of the System Owners Group ("SOG ") as defined and describdd by the Ancillary Agreements. 7.06 The Contract Manager may be the sole signatory for any additional contracts. per authorization by the SOG. 7.07 The Contract Manager shall, where applicable and directed by Ancillary Agreement, invoice the Parties for their Ownership Percentage share of authorized costs and shall pay Vendors as defined and described by said Ancillary Agreement. 7.08 The Contract Manager may expend funds on behalf of the Parties, at the direction of the Emergency Communication Services Committee, if the governing bodies of Page 4 of 14 the Parties appropriate funds.for such purposes. ARTICLE 8 GOVERNANCE- EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMMITTEE 8.01 The Emergency Communications Services Committee, consisting of one representative designated by each Party's governing body, or that, person's designee, shall meet quarterly, and at such other times as deemed necessary by the Chairperson to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.. Each Party may designate one or more alternates. Each Party shall provide to the Contract Manager a resolution or letter which identifies the representative and designees, by title or name, and authorizes their participation in the Committee. Designation of a representative and designee constitutes a grant of authorization to act in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 8.02 The Committee shall select a Chairperson and a Vicq/ Chairperson with responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement and as further identified by the Committee. 8.03 Equal Voting shall be used on all matters. 8.04 The Committee shall meet quarterly, at a .min'i'mum, and will convene on an as needed basis as determined by the Chair a - d Vice - Chair. 8.05 The Committee shall comply with the Open Meeting Law. 8.06 Each representative shall be entitled to vote, including the Chairperson. 8.07 In the event of a tie, the CW6irperson shall be entitled to exercise an additional vote. 8.08 The MESB shall be ,6ntitled to have a representative participate in meetings, but shall not be entitl to vote. ARTICLE 9 / PURCHASING 9.01 The Parties may make Project purchases jointly. Parties shall submit, after coordinating with each other, a Request for Proposals to qualified vendors. Negotiations with vendors shall be done jointly and selection of a qualified vendor shall be made jointly. All joint purchases shall be made in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Parties; the Uniform Municipal Contracting. Law, Minnesota Statutes § 471.345; and other applicable Minnesota laws, ordinances, and requirements. Each Party may be a signatory to any Project purchase agreement or contract. Page 5 of 14 9.02 If one of the Parties wishes to make an individual purchase of a System enhancement, the Party shall inform the SOG, as identified herein, of the desired enhancement and request an analysis by the SOG of the impact, if any, of the desired enhancement on the respective system. The Party shall not purchase or install the enhancement until any adverse impact on the respective system software, as identified by the SOG, `'has been addressed as part of the purchase and installation of the enhancement. ARTICLE 10 ADDITIONAL PARTIES 10.01 Additional PSAP owners may become Parties to this Agreement upon approval of a majority vote of the Emergency Communications Services Committee. 10.02 If additional PSAP owners become Parties, any financial expectations and /or commitments will be defined in the respective Ancillary Agreement. ARTICLE 11 WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION 11.01 No Party may withdraw during the first five years following execution of this Agreement unless any provision of this Agreement violates any applicable federal or state statute, rule, regulation, or administrative or judicial decision, in which case, withdrawal by a Party shall be per ai{ed. 11.02 Following the first.five years, Parties ay terminate participation in this Agreement by providing a thirty (30) day noti , in writing to the MESB. / ARTICLE 12 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 12.01 Each Party and the/MESB is, and shall remain, an independent contractor with respect to all sery es performed under this Agreement.. Each Party and the MESB shall select the means, method, and manner of performing their respective services herein. Nothing is intended or should 'be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of a partnership between the parties hereto or as costituting any party as the agent, representative, or employee of the other for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. Each Party and the MESB represents that it has or will secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing their respective services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of any Party or other persons engaged in the performance of any work or services under this Agreement shall not be considered an employee of any other Party or the MESB. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Unemployment Insurance Act, the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota, or any other applicable Federal or State law, rule, or regulation on behalf of said personnel, arising out of employment or alleged employment, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against any Party or the MESB, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of any other Page 6 of 14 Party or the MESB. ARTICLE 13 .. INDEMNIFICATION 13.01 To the full extent permitted by law, actions.by the Parties and the MESB pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and.shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the Parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, subd. 1 a (a) and (b); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each Party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other Party. 13.02 The liability of each Party and the MESB are subject to the applicable statutory limits of liability and to all statutory, and common law immunities.and defenses. ARTICLE 14 DATA PRIVACY 14.01 The Parties and the MESB agree to abide by all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations concerning the handling and di closure of private and confidential information concerning individuals and /or data including but not limited to information made non - public by such laor regulations. ART � LE 15 MINNESOTA LAWS G VERN AND SEVERABILITY 15.01 The laws of the State of MiTesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations and performance obligations between the Parties'herein. ARTICLE 16 . RECORDS -AVAILABILITY 16.01 The Parties and the MESB agree that each Party hereto, and the MESB, the State Auditor/'r any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Parties and the MESB that are relevant to this Agreement and to transactions. relating to this Agreement. The Parties and the MESB shall maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement, as well as for a duration consistent with Minnesota State Statute after its termination or cancellation. ARTICLE 17 MERGER AND MODIFICATION Page 7 of 14 17.01 It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement between the Parties and the MESB is contained herein and.that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations among the Parties and the MESB relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this, Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the Parties hereto and the MESB. ARTICLE 18 COUNTERPARTS 18.01 This Agreement may be executed in one'or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. ARTICLE 19 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 19.01 The Parties and the MESB will cooperate to resolve any disputes as provided in Article 2.01. Any disputes that cannot be` resolved by the Emergency Communications Services Committee may be referred to the top administrative official for each Party or the MESB. Di pates that remain unresolved may be referred to mediation. The Parties and t d MESB shall have the right to commence legal action, individually or jointly, ageinst any other Party that fails to fulfill any financial obligations it commits to y,rfder this Agreement. ARTICLE 20 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 20.01 The terms of this Agreement are binding on all successors and assigns. No Party to this Agreemeryt/shall be relieved of its financial liability under this Agreement following a me.rder, acquisition, or assignment, unless approved by a unanimous vote of all representatives in the Committee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this Agreement have hereunto have set their hands on the date written below: (Signature pages to follow) Page 8 of 14 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM d /b /a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services By: Susan Heichert, SVP CIO Date 3° Page 9 of 14 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Chair of its County Board Date Attest: Deputy /Clerk of its County Board Date Approved as to form: ,i Assistant County Attorney Date Page 10 of 14 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA By: James Hovland, Mayor Date By: S.cott Neal, City Manager Date Page 11 of 14 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Department Responsible for Administering and Monitoring Agreement By: Its Director of Department of Emergency Communications J Finance Officer or Designee Date f.: Approved as to form: Page 12 of 14 J Date City Attorney Date SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center !1 Kathy Wilde Date Chief Nursing Officer Interim Vice President for Professional and Support Services Page 13 of 14 `- To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL 8110 �RFORA'iF' Agenda Item P. IV. D From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Ancillary Agreement 01 for the Procurement of Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System Action Requested: Approve and authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign attached Ancillary Agreement with Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Information / Background: The purpose of this Ancillary Agreement is to describe and define the governing relationship between and among the Parties relative to procurements of a Shared 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System, related shared Wide Area Network Connectivity, and related shared Data Center Usage. This agreement was developed and negotiated over the past year and recently finalized by all parties. Legal counsels for all parties have reviewed this proposed agreement. Attachments: • Ancillary Agreement 01 to the Emergency Communications Services Master Cooperative Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 ANCILLARY AGREEMENT 01 FOR PROCURMENT OF A SHARED /HOSTED.9 -1 -1 CALL HANDLING SYSTEM AND RELATED SHARED WIDE AREA NETWORK CONNECTIVITY AND SHARED DATA CENTER USAGE to the MASTER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING AND COORDINATING DELIVERY OF EMEGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES THIS ANCILLARY AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between Allina Health System d /b /a Allina Health `Emergency_ Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., d /b /a Hennepin County Medical Center (collectively, the "Parties") which own and operate individual Public Safety Answering Points ( "PSAPs ") or Secondary PSAPs, and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board ( "ME$B"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the MESB was established to facilitate the planning and coordinate the delivery of emergency communications services including E9 -1 -1 and emerging services such as next generation (NG)9 -1 -.1; and WHEREAS, the five (5) metropolitan area PSAPs listed herein have an immediate need to replace their existing 9 -1 -1 call processing equipment; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County, the City of Edina, and the City of Minneapolis operate Primary PSAPs and Allina Health System d /b /a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. d /b /a Hennepin County Medical Center, operate Zecondary PSAPs; ,and WHEREAS, these PSAPs will benefit financially and /or operationally from common ownership and management of a Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System; and WHEREAS, the Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System will require a Wide Area Network for connectivity and usage of two (2) Data Centers for Common Equipment housing; and WHEREAS, the procurement of a Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System, a Wide Area Network and Data Center usage, would be best served through a cooperative approach; and WHEREAS, the MESB in cooperation with the Parties to this Ancillary Agreement, and five other Metropolitan area PSAPs issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System that could be networked among and utilized by these PSAPs needing equipment and /or software upgrades; and Page 1 of 21 WHEREAS, the proposal from Independent Emergency Services (IES), the Equipment Vendor, was selected because it offers a Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System that is technically sound, provides opportunities to contain aggregate costs, enhances PSAP telephone call processing interoperability, improves intra -PSAP and inter -PSAP backup processes; and offers best value; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County will provide portions of the Data Center Wide Area Network connectivity, as described herein; and WHEREAS, the remaining required network connectivity between the PSAPs and the Data Centers, in the form of PSAP Wide Area Network links, will be procured in accordance with individual PSAP needs; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County will provide space in their facilities for two (2) Data Centers as described herein; and WHEREAS, the MESB has the expertise to serve as Contract Manager /Fiscal Agent on behalf of the other Parties to this Ancillary Agreement who own and operate the PSAPs; and WHEREAS, the Parties and the MESB are all "governmental units" as that term is used in Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, subdivision 1 (which includes nonprofit hospitals licensed under §§ 144.50 to 144.56 as "governmental units "), and are authorized under that statute to enter into this Ancillary Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the Parties and the MESB agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 PURPOSE 1.01 The purpose of this Ancillary Agreement is to describe and define the governing relationship between and among the Parties relative to procurements of a Shared 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System, related shared-Wide Area Network Connectivity, and related shared Data Center Usage, as identified herein. ARTICLE 2 COOPERATION 2.01 The Parties and the MESB hereto will cooperate and use reasonable efforts to ensure that the various provisions of this Ancillary Agreement are fulfilled. ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Ancillary Agreement, the following Definitions apply: Page 2of21 3.01 "Common Equipment" means 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System control equipment provided by the Equipment Vendor which will be. located at two or more Data Centers and will facilitate call processing for local and remote PSAP client workstations: 3.02 "Data Center" means the specific location(s)., housing the Common :Equipment. The Data Center(s) may or may not be located on a PSAP premises. 3.03 "Equal Voting" means each Party has one vote. Equal Voting requires a Simple Majority Quorum to vote, and a majority vote of the representatives - present to adopt a resolution. 3.04. "Equipment Room" means the location in a PSAP which houses the local system central processing units, gateways, routers, switches and other peripherals required,to allow interoperability between the Common Equipment and the PSAP client workstations. 3.05 "Equipment Vendor" means the vendor which is under contract with the Parties and the Contract Manager for the purchase of System equipment, software, and related services identified in a duly executed purchase agreement. 3.06 "Maintenance Vendor" means the vendor which is under contract with the Parties and the Contract Manager for services for the Common Equipment and the PSAP Equipment identified in a duly executed maintenance agreement. 3.07 "Ownership Percentage" means the percentage of each Party's indivisible ownership of the Common Equipment, and is also equal to the percentage of each Party's payments for the Common Equipment as well as each Party's value for the purposes of Weighted Voting. The following formula will be used to determine Ownership Percentage for each Party: (E + R + P) / T = OP "E" represents one half of the Common Equipment Cost allocated equally among the Parties (e.g. 1/5). "R" represents one half of the Common Equipment Cost allocated by a ratio of the count of-a Party's workstations to the count of all workstations (e.g. 4/111)., "P" represents the Party's Local Equipment;Cost. "T" represents the overall Total System Cost. "OP" represents the Ownership Percentage. 3.08 "Public safety answering point (PSAP)" means a communications facility operated on a 24 -hour basis which first receives 9 -1 -1 calls from persons in a 9 -1- 1 service area and which may, as appropriate, directly dispatch public safety services or extend, transfer, or relay 911 calls to appropriate public safety agencies. 3.09 "Secondary public safety answering point" means a communications facility that: (1)`is operated on a 24 -hour basis, in which a minimum of three public safety Page 3 of 21 ,-z� answering points (PSAPs) route calls for post- dispatch or pre - arrival instructions; (2) receives calls directly from medical facilities to reduce call volume at the PSAPs; and (3) is able to receive 9-1 -1 calls routed to it from a PSAP when the PSAP is unable to receive or answer 9 -1 -1 calls. 3.10 "PSAP Equipment" means client workstation. monitors, dispatch area central processing units, and other peripherals located in the dispatch area of the PSAPs that are required under the agreement with the Equipment Vendor to facilitate the processing of 9 -1 -1 calls routed from the Common Equipment. 3.11 "Parties to a. Shared /Hosted System" means that each Party included in a Shared /Hosted System will be identified in an Ancillary Agreement. Each Ancillary Agreement shall be executed by the identified Parties. 3.12 "Party's Local Equipment Cost" means the aggregate costs for each PSAP, including Equipment Room equipment and PSAP Equipment as represented in the agreements, with the Equipment Vendor. This aggregate cost will include a PSAP's related back -up center costs as determined to be necessary by the participating PSAP organization, where applicable, in said agreements. 3.13 "Phased Project" means the Parties will implement services at differing time intervals as determined by the Parties and the vendor. 3.14 "Reserve Fund" means the fund established by the Parties pursuant to Article 6 for the purpose of emergency expenditures and service related costs not otherwise provided for herein. 3.15 "Simple Majority Quorum" means a majority of the Parties to this Ancillary Agreement are present at a meeting. 3.16 "Shared /Hosted System" or "System" means a 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System that has Common Equipment at one or more Data Centers providing shared call distribution services to remote client workstations at PSAPs. 3.17 "System Owners Group (SOG)" means a group made up of a single representative from each Party to this Ancillary Agreement. The SOG rights and responsibilities are described in this document. There may be an SOG for each Ancillary Agreement. Representatives may be a member of one or more SOGs. 3.18 "Weighted Voting" means each Party has a value in voting that is equal to the Party's Ownership Percentage. Weighted Voting requires a Simple Majority Quorum to vote, and a majority of the Weighted Votes of the representatives present to adopt a resolution. 3.19 "Wide Area Network (WAN)" means the data connectivity media and equipment (including fiber, copper, and other suitable transport modes) which delivers information between and among the Data Centers and Equipment Rooms. Page 4 of 21 ARTICLE 4 ANCILLARY AGREEMENT 01 TO MASTER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 4.01 This is Ancillary Agreement 01 to the Master Cooperative Agreement attached hereto. 4.02 This Ancillary Agreement includes the Parties making .a procurement, as well as the MESB, agreeing to terms and conditions of a Shared /Hosted Call Handling System, a Shared Wide Area Network and Shared Data Centers' usage. 4.03 This Ancillary Agreement includes Terms and Conditions related to the equipment and services being procured, which will be enforced in addition to the Master Cooperative Agreement, if applicable. ARTICLE 5 TERM 5.01 This Ancillary Agreement shall take effect upon execution by the Parties, and shall have an initial term .of five years ( "Initial Term "). 5.02 This Ancillary Agreement will automatically renew for successive two -year periods following expiration of the Initial Term ( "Renewal Term "). ARTICLE 6 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES FOR THE SHARED 9 -1 -1 CALL HANDLING SYSTEM 6.01 Each Party will assume the roles and responsibilities as described herein. 6.02 Each Party shall be responsible for its share of the cost for initial acquisition of, and any future moves; additions and changes to, Common Equipment, services, and related software, including license, as set forth in this Ancillary Agreement, and included in related Purchase and /or Maintenance Agreements and Attachments and any amendments to said Agreements, based on. Ownership Percentage of the time of the purchase or as amended in accordance with the terms hereof. 6.03 Each Party shall be responsible for the full cost for its initial acquisition of, and any future moves, additions and changes to, its PSAP Equipment, services and related software, including license, as set forth in this Ancillary Agreement and included in related Purchase and /or Maintenance Agreements and Attachments and any amendments to said agreements. 6.04 Each Party shall sign a joint purchase agreement with the Equipment Vendor for the purchase of the Common Equipment, and related software, including licenses and services, and amendments to the agreement for future moves, additions and changes to the Common Equipment, and related software, including licenses and Page 5 of 21 services. The purchase agreement shall have signatory blocks that will correspond with the ,Party's consolidation into a Shared /Hosted System. 6.05 Each Party shall sign an attachment to the joint purchase agreement with the Equipment Vendor for the purchase of the PSAP Equipment, and related software, including licenses and services, and amendments, to the agreement for future moves, additions and changes to the PSAP Equipment, and related software, including licenses and services. 6.06 Each. Party's respective system configuration, including an equipment list and related pricing shall be represented in the individual purchase agreement. 6.07 Each Party shall sign a joint maintenance agreement with the Maintenance Vendor for the maintenance of the Common Equipment, and related software, including licenses, and services, and. amendments; to the agreement for future. moves, additions and changes to the Common Equipment, and related software, including licenses and services. The maintenance agreement shall have, signatory blocks that will correspond with the Party's consolidation into a.Shared /Hosted System. 6.08 Each Party shall sign an attachment to the joint maintenance agreement with the Maintenance Vendor for the maintenance of the .PSAP Equipment, and' related software, including licenses and services, and amendments to the agreement for future moves, additions and changes to the PSAP Equipment, and related software, including licenses and services. 6.09 Upon receipt of the Equipment Vendor's invoice, each Party shall directly pay the Equipment Vendor for the purchase of its Ownership Percentage of the Common Equipment, in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement and any amendments thereto. 6.10 Upon receipt of the Equipment Vendor's invoice, each Party shall directly pay the Equipment Vendor for the PSAP Equipment, and related software,. including licenses and services, in accordance with the terms of the purchase. agreement and any amendments thereto. 6.11 Following .System acceptance and upon final payment, a Party shall own an undivided share of the Common Equipment and any future equipment changes or additions based on its Ownership Percentage at the time of the purchase or as amended in accordance with the terms hereof. 6.12 . All Common Equipment, PSAP Equipment, and maintenance_ services shall be purchased solely from the Equipment Vendor and Maintenance Vendor pursuant to the provisions of the agreements with the Equipment Vendor and the Maintenance Vendor, except as otherwise authorized by the SOG. 6.13 Each Party, connected to the Data Centers, shall be responsible,for its share of the cost for the Wide Area Network, which traverses from Data Center to Data Page 6 of 21 Center, including initial acquisition of and any recurring costs, as set,forth in the agreement with the Network Service Provider(s), based on Ownership Percentage at the time of the purchase or as amended in accordance with the terms Hereof. 6.14 Each Party shall solely own its PSAP Equipment. Each PSAP shall be responsible for its back -up and disaster recovery strategy, including cost of hardware, software and licenses. 6.15 The SOG shall establish System Integrator roles and responsibilities, in concert with the original RFP and confirm them with the vendor. 6.16 The Parties shall make an initial total contribution to a Reserve Fund in the amount of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000): The Parties' contributions shall be allocated by formula equal to Ownership Percentage. 6.17 These contributions shall be supplemented by the Parties as determined necessary by the SOG. The Parties' supplemental contributions shall be allocated by formula equal to Ownership Percentage. 6.18 At the beginning of each calendar year, each Party shall submit to the MESB its annual contribution for other service related costs. The SOG shall approve the amount of the total contribution and cost - allocation plan for the year. The MESB shall send each Party notice of its allocation. ARTICLE 7 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES FOR THE WIDE AREA NETWORK (WAN) CONNECTIVITY 7.01 Each Party will assume the roles and responsibilities as described herein. 7.02 Each Party agrees that the Wide Area Network (WAN) connectivity will be segmented into and addressed in two (2) areas: • Shared core WAN connectivity between Data Centers • Individual segment WAN connectivity between Data- Centers and Equipment Rooms 7.03 Each Party shall be responsible for its share of the cost for initial acquisition of, and any future moves, additions and changes to, Shared WAN connectivity, services, and related software, including license, as set forth in this Ancillary Agreement. 7.04 Each Party shall be responsible for its cost for initial. acquisition, of, and any future moves, additions and changes to, Individual WAN connectivity, services, and related software, including license, as set forth in this Ancillary Agreement. 7.05 The Shared WAN connectivity will be provided in whole by Hennepin County. Page 7 of 21 7.06 Hennepin County will determine costs to be attributable to the Shared WAN and charge the other Parties for their share as provided in Article 8. These costs will be "above and beyond" otherwise anticipated costs for their own non - .Shared connectivity requirements. 7.07 The Individual WAN connectivity will,be established collectivelyby the Parties. 7.08 The Shared /Hosted System(s) require(s) network connectivity. The network(s) shall be a private Wide Area Networks (WAN) which are owned, leased, or a combination of both, by the Parties. 7.09 The WAN shall be monitored and managed: Said monitoring and management may be provided by (an) out - sourced organization(s) as determined and approved by the .SOG. 7.10 The WAN shall provide a fully redundant and diversely routed physical network between the Data Centers and to each PSAP from each Data Center. 7.11 The WAN provider(s) shall have Service Level Agreements (SLA) written into contracts with the Parties. 7.12 The WAN costs shall be allocated to the Parties as described herein. 7.13 The WAN may be redesigned in accordance with the needs of the Parties as approved by the SOG. ARTICLE 8 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES FOR THE SHARED DATA CENTER USAGE 8.01 Each Party will assume the roles and responsibilities as described herein. 8.02 Hennepin County will provide access to two (2) Data Centers at the following locations: • Hennepin County Sheriffs Communications Center, 1245 Shenandoah, Plymouth, MN • Hennepin County Government Center, 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis MN. 8.03 Each Party shall be responsible for its share of the cost for initial acquisition of, and any future moves, additions and changes to, Shared Data Center Usage, services, and related software, including license, as set forth in this Ancillary Agreement. 8.04 The Contract Manager shall enter into a separate Data Center agreement with the owner of each Data Center which specifies operational requirements, Service Page 8 of 21 Level Agreements (SLAs), and compensation, subject to final approval of the System Owners Group by Weighted Voting. 8.05 The Data Center agreement will also include provisions for allocating costs attributable to the Shared WAN. 8.06 The Contract Manager shall invoice each Party for its-share of the payments due under the Data Center agreement. ARTICLE 9 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MESB 9.01 The Parties.hereby designate the MESB as the Parties' Contract Manager /Fiscal Agent ( "Contract Manager") for the purposes of this Ancillary Agreement. 9.02 The Contract Manager and the Parties shall execute a single Master Purchase Agreement with the Equipment Vendor for the procurement, construction, and implementation of the Common Equipment and related software, including licenses and services. 9.03 The Contract Manager and the Parties shall execute a single contract with the Maintenance Vendor for ongoing annual maintenance of the Common Equipment and the PSAP Equipment. 9.04 Prior to receipt of an invoice from the Equipment Vendor, the Contract Manager will coordinate with each Party and notify them of their Ownership Percentage share of the purchase price of the Common Equipment and related software and services and the Party shall pay the Equipment Vendor directly in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement. 9.05 Prior to receipt of an invoice from the Equipment Vendor, ;the Contract Manager will coordinate with each Party and notify them of the cost for the Party's PSAP Equipment and related software and services, and the Party shall pay the Equipment Vendor directly in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement. 9.06 Prior to receipt of an invoice from the Equipment Vendor, the Contract Manager will coordinate with each Party and notify them of their Ownership Percentage share of the cost for maintenance of the Common Equipment and 'related software and services and the Party shall pay the Equipment Vendor directly in. accordance with the terms of the Maintenance Agreement. 9.07 Prior to receipt of an invoice from the Equipment Vendor, the Contract Manager will coordinate with the each Party and notify them of the cost for maintenance of the Party's PSAP Equipment and related software and services, and the Party shall pay the Maintenance Vendor directly in accordance with the terms of the Maintenance Agreement. Page 9 of 21 9.08 The Contract Manager may be the sole signatory for any additional contracts per authorization by the System Owners Group as defined and described in this Ancillary Agreement. 9.09 It is not anticipated that the Contract Manager will have any direct involvement in facilitating. the contracting, invoicing, or processing payments for Individual WAN connectivity. 9.10 The Contract Manager shall, where applicable and directed by the SOG, invoice the Parties for their Ownership Percentage share of authorized costs and shall pay vendors as defined and described by this Ancillary Agreement. The Contract Manager shall be authorized to spend up to $10,000 in the aggregate during the applicable budget cycle for other common expenses of the Parties without action by the .System Owners. Group, if provided in the SOG- approved budget. The Contract Manager shall be authorized to spend between $10,000 and $20,000 in the aggregate r during the applicable budget cycle for other common expenses of the Parties, after consultation with, and upon approval by, the System Owners Group by Weighted Voting, if provided in the SOG- approved budget. The Contract Manager shall be authorized to spend between $20,000 and $50,000 for other common expenses of the Parties to remedy an emergency situation in which the 9 -1 -1 call handling system functionality is substantially impaired or not functional, after consultation with, and upon approval by, the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson of the System Owners Group. The Contract'. Manager shall notify all SOG representatives. of such action as soon as possible after the event. ARTICLE 10 GOVERNANCE - SYSTEM OWNERS GROUP 10.01 The System Owners Group, consisting of one representative designated by the governing body. of each Party of this Ancillary Agreement, or that person's designee, shall meet quarterly, and at such other times as deemed necessary by the .Chairperson to carry out the purposes of this Ancillary Agreement. The representative and /or designee must be a person familiar with the Party's PSAP operations as a supervisor or manager. Each Party may designate one or more alternates. Each Party shall provide to the Contract Manager a resolution or letter which identifies the representative and designees, by title or name, and authorizes their participation in the SOG. Designation of a representative and designee constitutes a grant of authorization to act in accordance with the provisions of the Master Agreement and. this Ancillary Agreement. 10.02 The SOG shall select a Chairperson and a Vice Chairperson with responsibilities as set forth in this Ancillary Agreement and as further identified by the SOG. Page 10 of 21 10.03 The System Owners Group shall: 10.03.1 assist the Contract Manager with the creation and configuration of the NG9 -1 -1 Call Handling System's global settings, set standards, and provide the information to the Contract Manager. assist the Contract Manager with the design and implementation of the Wide Area Network. assist the Contract. Manager with the determination of Data Center Usage costs, and allocation of those costs to the Parties. 10.03.2 develop the. NG9 -1 -1 Call Handling System technical, operational and maintenance standards and provide those to the Contract Manager develop the Wide Area Network technical, operational and maintenance standards, as well as Service Level Agreements and Network Monitoring plans for the Wide Area Network, and provide those to the Contract Manager. develop the Data Center Service Level Agreements and provide those to the Contract Manager. 10.03.3 maintain ongoing communications with, and provide assistance to, the Contract Manager on an ongoing basis regarding the status of contract issues with the Equipment Maintenance Vendors. Maintain ongoing communications with, and provide assistance to, the Contact Manager on an ongoing basis regarding the status of the Wide Area Network and its operation. Maintain ongoing communications with, and provide assistance to, the Contact Manager on an ongoing basis regarding the status of the Data Center Usage. 10.04 Following implementation of the NG9 -1 -1 Call Handling System, the System Owners Group shall be responsible for developing plans for future System moves, additions and changes for discussion by the Parties and the MESB. Following implementation of the Wide Area Network connectivity, the System Owners Group shall be responsible for developing plans for future WAN moves, additions and changes for discussion by the Parties and the MESB.' Following implementation of the Data Center, the System Owners Group shall be responsible for developing plans for future usage, moves, additions and changes for discussion by the Parties and the MESB. Page 11 of 21 10.05 Weighted Voting shall be used on contractual issues and on the expenditure of funds. Equal Voting shall be used on all non- monetary matters. 10.06 Each representative shall be entitled to vote, including the Chairperson as indicated herein. 10.07 In the event of a tie, the Chairperson shall be entitled to exercise an additional vote. 10.08 The MESB shall be entitled to have a representative participate' in meetings, but shall not be entitled to vote. ARTICLE 11 PURCHASING 11.01 If a Party, wishes to make an individual purchase of a System enhancement, the Party shall inform the SOG, as identified herein, of the desired enhancement and request an analysis by the SOG of the impact, if any, of the desired enhancement on the respective system. The Party shall not purchase or install the enhancement until any adverse impact on the respective system software, as identified by the SOG, has been addressed as part of the purchase and installation of the enhancement. ARTICLE 12 ADDITIONAL PARTIES 12.01 The Ancillary Agreement's System Owners Group shall, by Weighted Voting of the Parties, establish conditions for another PSAP owner becoming a Party, including sharing in an allocation of a prorated share of the cost of the Common Equipment and their share of the Reserve Fund. 12.02 Additional Parties shall be added by an amendment to this Agreement which shall be approved by the governing bodies of the Parties, the additional. PSAP owner and the MESS, and shall include a recalculation of the Ownership Percentage for all Parties. The revised Ownership Percentage is to become effective upon the new Party joining the consortium. Payment by the new Party of its Ownership Percentage share of the initial cost of the Common Equipment, and individual PSAP cost shall be calculated immediately and invoices distributed in accordance with other Articles herein ARTICLE 13 WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION 13.01 No Party may withdraw from its financial obligations herein during the Initial Term. 13.02 A Party may withdraw from this Ancillary . Agreement effective at the commencement of any Renewal Term by providing written notice to all other Parties and the MESB at least 18 months prior to commencement of such Renewal Term, or withdraw at any time. if any provision of this Agreement violates any Page 12 of 21 0 applicable federal or state statute, rule, regulation, or administrative or judicial decision. 13.03 If a Party withdraws in accordance with the provisions of Article 13.02, the withdrawing Party shall automatically forfeit its undivided ownership interest in the Common Equipment and its interest in the Reserve Fund to the remaining Parties and the Ownership Percentages for all remaining Parties shall be recalculated. 13.04 If a majority of the System Owners Group, using Weighted Voting, elects to terminate this Ancillary Agreement, this Ancillary Agreement will terminate. The Contract Manager shall be authorized to assist the Parties in winding down the business of the Parties herein, including terminating related agreements entered -into pursuant to this Ancillary Agreement. The Contract Manager shall offer the Common Equipment to the Parties for purchase. If no Parties desire to purchase the Common Equipment, it shall be sold.by the Contract Manager in.the open market. If one or more Parties to this Ancillary Agreement desire to purchase the Common Equipment, then the Contract Manager shall obtain an appraisal and shall negotiate a sale of part or all of the Common Equipment to one or more Parties, subject to approval by the SOG by Weighted Voting. If such negotiations ,are. unsuccessful or if the sale is not approved by the SOG, then the Contract Manager shall sell the remaining Common Equipment at auction to the highest bidder. In any case, the net proceeds. shall be divided among the then - existing Parties by respective Ownership Percentage. ARTICLE 14 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 14.01 Each Party and the MESB is, and shall remain, an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. Each Party and the MESB shall select the means, method, and manner of performing their respective services herein. Nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of a partnership between the parties hereto or as constituting any party as the agent, representative, or employee of the other for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. Each Party and the MESB represents that it, has or will secure at its .own expense all personnel required in performing their respective services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of any Party or other persons engaged in the performance of any work or services under this Agreement shall not be considered an employee of any other Party or the MESB. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Unemployment Insurance Act, the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota,'or any other applicable Federal or State law, rule, or regulation on behalf of said personnel, arising out of employment or alleged employment, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against any' Party or the MESB, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of any other Party or the MESB. Page 13 of 21 ARTICLE 15 INDEMNIFICATION 15.01 To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the Parties and the MESB pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the Parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, subd. 1 a (a) and (b); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each Party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other Party. ARTICLE 16 DATA PRIVACY 16.01 The Parties and the MESB agree to abide by all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations concerning the handling and disclosure of private and confidential information concerning individuals and /or data including but not limited to information made non - public by such laws or regulations. ARTICLE 17 MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN AND SEVERABILITY 17.01 The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations and performance obligations between the Parties herein. ARTICLE 18 RECORDS - AVAILABILITY 18.01 The Parties and the MESB agree that each Party hereto, and the MESB, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem_ necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures.and practices of the Parties and the MESB that are relevant to this Agreement and to transactions relating to this Agreement. The Parties and the MESB shall maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement, as well as for a duration consistent with Minnesota State Statute after its termination or cancellation. ARTICLE 19 MERGER AND MODIFICATION 19.01 It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement between the Parties and the MESB is contained in the Master Agreement and this Ancillary Agreement, and Page 14 of 21 that the Master Agreement and this Ancillary Agreement - supersede all oral agreements and negotiations among the Parties and the MESB relating to the subject matter hereof. All, items referred to in the Master Agreement and this Ancillary Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to. the Master, Agreement. and this Ancillary Agreement signed by the Parties hereto and the MESB. ARTICLE 20 COUNTERPARTS 20.01 This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and. the same agreement. ARTICLE 21 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 21.01 The Parties and the MESB will cooperate to resolve any disputes as provided in Article 2.01. Any disputes that cannot be resolved by the System Owners Group may be referred to the top administrative official for each Party or the MESB. Disputes that remain unresolved may be referred to mediation. The Parties and the MESB shall have the right to commence legal action, individually or jointly, against any other Party that fails to fulfill any financial obligations it commits to under this Agreement. ARTICLE 22 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 22.01 The terms of this Agreement are binding on all successors and assigns. No Party to this Agreement shall be relieved of its financial liability under this Agreement following a merger, acquisition, or assignment, unless approved by a unanimous vote of all representatives in the System Owners Group. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this Agreement have hereunto have set their hands on the date written below: (Signature pages to follow) Page 16 of 21 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM d /b /a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services By: Susan Heichert, SVP CIO Date Page 16 of 21 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA 0 Chair of its County Board Date Attest: Deputy /Clerk of its County Board Date Approved as to form: Assistant County Attorney Date Page 17 of 21 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA By: James Hovland, Mayor Date By: Scott Neal, City Manager Date Page 18 of 21 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Department Responsible for Administering and Monitoring Agreement By: Its Director of Department of Emergency Communications Date Finance Officer or Designee Date Approved as to form: Date Page 19 of 21 City Attorney r SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. d /b /a Hennepin County Medical Center By: Kathy Wilde Date Chief Nursing Officer Interim Vice President for Professional and Support Services Page 20 of 21 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD By: Chair Page 21 of 21 Date To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Date: June 17, 2014 14A1 'Leo 0 1 y Agenda Item #k IV. E. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System Solution Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 20, 2013 Company: Independent Emergency Services, LLC Recommended Quote or Bid: Independent Emergency Services, LLC Bid or Expiration Date: June 30, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $354,959 $354,959 General Information: In 2012, Edina and eight other metro area PSAPs were notified that their current 9 -1 -1 phone systems were reaching end -of -life and would not be supported beginning in 2016. Using the ARMER radio system as a model, ten metro agencies in need of a new phone system began a collaborative effort to integrate services, share technology and reduce costs in the procurement of emergency communications services and equipment. The agencies began working with the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board and PSC Alliance Consultants to develop an RFI and RFP for a turn -key solution to replace the existing 9 -1 -1 Call Handling Systems. A lengthy review by agency representatives resulted in the unanimous selection of the Cassidian Vesta Four Phone System offered by Independent Emergency Services. Evaluation criteria included proposed maintenance, five -year projected cost of ownership, system design to RFP specifications, utility assessment, user interface and audio quality. IES was determined to provide a more viable system solution in meeting the needs and requirements of the PSAPs. In Phase One of this project, the system will be shared by the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office, Hennepin County Emergency Medical Services, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis and Allina Emergency Medical Services. Phase Two will include Carver County and Ridgeview Ambulance. Phase Three will include Ramsey County and Dakota County Communications Centers. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To date, four of the five agencies in Phase One have approved and signed the Cooperative Agreement, Ancillary Agreement and Purchase Agreement. Legal counsels for all participants have reviewed the . Agreement. The entire cost of this system (which includes five years of pre -paid maintenance) will come from the E91 I Fund and is within budget. Attachment: • Purchase Agreement for a Five - Agency Consortium Shared /Hosted Next Generation 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System Solution *Exhibits are available for review, in the Police Department upon request. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 PURCHASE AGREEMENT for a' FIVE - AGENCY CONSORTIUM SHARED / HOSTED NEXT GENERATION 9 -1 -1 CALL HANDLING SYSTEM SOLUTION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of May, 2014 by and between Allina Health System d /b /a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, .and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. d /b /a Hennepin County Medical Center (individually, "Buyer" and collectively,, "Buyers "), which own and operate individual. Public Safety Answering Points ( "PSAPs "), and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board ( "MESB ") which will serve as Contract Manager for the Buyers, and Independent Emergency Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "IES" or '`Contractor"). LTA k ii►I4 *1-4 " WHEREAS, the Buyers, along with the MESB, and other PSAP owners in the metropolitan area issued a Request for Proposals ( "RFP ") for a Shared /Hosted Next Generation 9-1 -1 Call Handling System with an Integrated_ Administrative Telephone System (the "System "); and WHEREAS, after reviewing four proposals, the Buyers selected the proposal submitted by IES as the proposal offering the best value (the "Proposal "); and WHEREAS, the Buyers have entered into a Master Cooperative Agreement for Planning. and Coordinating Delivery of Emergency Communications Services; and WHEREAS, the Buyers have entered into an Ancillary Agreement 01 for Procurement of a Shared /Hosted 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System and Related Shared Wide Area Network Connectivity and Shared Data Center Usage (the "Ancillary Agreement "), that sets forth the roles and responsibilities of the Buyers and the MESB in regards to the ownership and operation of the System; and WHEREAS, IES acknowledges the relationship of the Buyers and the MESB as set forth in the Ancillary Agreement 01, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and agrees to cooperate with the Buyers and the MESB in its performance of the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the Buyers and the MESB and Contractor agree as follows: Contractor agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the equipment and the services which pertain to providing suitable shared /hosted NG9 -1 -1 Call Handling and Administrative Telephone Furnished Systems for the aggregate of, and individually for, five (5) PSAPs owned and operated by the Buyers and two (2) related Back -Up centers of the Metropolitan Area as provided in NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 1 of 12 the RFP dated June 28, 2013, as amended by Addendum #1 dated July 30, 2013. Section 1 of the RFP, including Contractors responses, is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Addendum #1 is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 2. Contractor agrees that all of the terms and conditions set forth in S e ct i o n 1 of the RFP, as amended by Addendum #1, are incorporated herein. 3. Contractor acknowledges that in its Proposal dated August 19, 2013, and i n c I u d e d i n E x h i b i t B, it accepted, and took no exceptions to, the terms and conditions set forth in the RFP, as amended by Addendum #1. 4. Contractor acknowledges the receipt of four (4) Memoranda subsequent to submission of its Proposal. Contractor submitted a response dated September 4, 2013 to Memorandum 01, a response dated October 19, 2013 to Memorandum 02, a response dated November. 18, 2013 to Memorandum 03, and a response dated December 21, 2013 to Memorandum 04. Contractor's responses to Memorandums 01, 02 and 03 are attached hereto as Exhibit D. Memorandum 04 and Contractor's response to it pertained solely to pricing and are superseded by other exhibits attached hereto. 5. Contractor agrees that the responses included in Section 1 of its Proposal and the responses to Memorandums 01, 02 and 03 are incorporated herein, except to the extent modified by the Common Equipment and Pricing List attached hereto as Exhibit E, and the five (5) PSAP Equipment and Pricing Lists attached hereto as Exhibits F. G. H. I and J, and the Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit K; and as provided below. 6. Contractor agrees that the terms set for in Exhibits E. F, G, H. I. J and K are incorporated herein. 7. Contractor agrees that all references to the Dakota Communications Center ( "DCC') as the location of a Data Center in the RFP and any other exhibits attached hereto shall be replaced with "Hennepin County Government Center." 8. Contractor agrees that it shall invoice each Buyer directly for its share of the Common Equipment described in Exhibit E, and for each Buyer's i n d i v i d u a l PSAP Equipment described in Exhibits F. G, H, I and J. Contractor shall send copies of all invoices to the Contract Manager. Contractor shall invoice each Buyer for its share of the Common Equipment in accordance with the information provided by the Contract Manager as to each Buyer's ownership share. Contractor shall submit its invoices and shall be paid in accordance with Section 3.30.1 of the RFP. Buyers shall remit payment within forty -five (45) calendar days of receipt. 9. As provided in Section 3.30.1 of the RFP, partial payments will be made as follows: NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 2 of 12 • 15% upon delivery of Official Project Timeline, Project Management Plan and Written Assignment of Resources subsequent to contract execution. • 50% upon completed installation of equipment, on a prorated basis; per Data Center and per site. • 10% upon completion of training and pre- cutover testing, prorated on a per site basis. • 15% upon Site Final Acceptance, on a prorated basis; per Data Center and per PSAP. • 10% upon Site Final Acceptance by the Owners, of the complete Furnished System, but in no event less than 45 calendar days following conversion of the last PSAP to the Furnished System acquired under this Agreement. 10. If payments set forth above are late, interest shall accrue at the rate of 1.5% (one and one -half percent) per month on any unpaid balance of a payment not received by the Contractor within forty- fve'(45) calendar days of the.date that said payment is due. . 11. In the event any federal, state, or local sales or use taxes become due as a result of this Agreement, the Equipment Purchase Price shall be increased by a like amount. 12. Upon delivery to Buyer, the risk of loss passes to Buyer and Buyer shall own the equipment. Prior thereto, the risk of loss shall be upon the Contractor. Prior to delivery to the Buyer, the Contractor shall carry sufficient insurance insuring the equipment against fire, theft and other casualty. 13. Contractor shall provide to all of the Buyers a fully paid -up, royalty -free, non- transferable, non - exclusive license in the software, in object code form only, one copy per single CPU, required for use of the Common Equipment. Contractor shall provide to each individual Buyer anon- transferable license in the software, in object code form only, one copy per. single CPU, required for use of each Buyer's individual PSAP Equipment. 14. All notices or other communications shall be deemed effectively delivered on the date of delivery if mailed certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, upon delivery using overnight courier, or personally delivered. All notices or other communications required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered or addressed as follows: If to IES: Independent Emergency Services, LLC Attention: President 235 Franklin St. SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 3 of 12 If to Allina: Allina PSAP Director Mail Route 54,101 167 Grand Avenue St Paul, MN 55102 If to Edina: Edina — PSAP Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 If to HEMS: HEMS — PSAP Director Red 2 701 Park Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 If to HCSO: HCSO - PSAP Director 1245 Shenandoah Lane North Plymouth, MN 55447 If to,MECC: MECC — PSAP Director 350 South 5th Street — Rm B -911 Minneapolis, MN 55415 With a copy of all notices and communication to: MESB — 9 -1 -1 Director 2099 University Avenue West St Paul, MN 55104 15. Contractor consents to additional PSAP owners sharing in the ownership of the Common Equipment. In accordance with the RFP, Contractor agrees to permit additional PSAP owners to purchase PSAP Equipment for a five (5) year period following Final Acceptance. Pricing for PSAP Equipment shall be based on the line item pricing found in Exhibits F -J. 16. Contractor agrees to communicate and fully cooperate with the Contract Manager to resolve disputes involving the Common Equipment. Contractor agrees to communicate and fully cooperate with the Contract Manager and the respective Buyer to resolve disputes involving individual PSAP Equipment. The Contract Manager and the Buyers, individually or jointly, shall have the right to initiate or participate in mediation, arbitration, or litigation to enforce the Buyers' rights under this Agreement. NG9 -1 -1 CH8 Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 4 of 12 17. Contractor acknowledges that the Contract Manager will have no financial or ownership, interest under this Agreement, and Contractor agrees to not hold the Contract. Manager responsible for any payments due Contractor under this Agreement. 18. Contractor agrees that the Buyers will each own an indivisible share of the Common Equipment in accordance with an Ownership Percentage allocation formula agreed to by the Buyers. Each Buyer will only be responsible for its fractional share of the price for the Common Equipment and the full cost of its individual PSAP Equipment. 19. A representative for each Buyer shall review and sign the Common Equipment Price List by signing Exhibit E, and shall review and sign the individual Price List for that Buyer by signing the respective exhibit listed below. 20. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. Exhibit List A. Ancillary Agreement 01 B. Section 1 of RFP for a Shared /Hosted Next Generation 9 -1 -1 Call Handling System, including Contractor's Responses C. Addendum #1 of RFP D. Responses to Memorandums 01 to 03 E. Common Equipment Price List F. Allina Health System d/b /a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services Price List G. Hennepin County Price List H. City of Edina Price List I. Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. d /b /a Hennepin County Medical Center Price List J. City of Minneapolis Price List K. Project Schedule dated 4 -29 -2014 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. (Signature pages to follow) NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 5 of 12 ..... .......................... ....._............... ........ ... ............................... SIGNATURE PAGE TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT. ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM d /b /a Mina Health Emergency Medical Services By: Susan Heichert,• SVP CIO Date NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Rage 0 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Chair of its County Board Date Attest: Deputy/Clerk of its County Board Date Approved as to form: Assistant County Attorney Date NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 7 of V SIGNATURE PAGE TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA By: James Hovland, Mayor Date By: Scott Neal, City Manager Date ` NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 8 of 12 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Department Responsible for Administering and Monitoring Agreement By: Its Director of Department of Emergency Communications Date Finance Officer or Designee Date Approved as to form: City Attorney Date NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase,Agreement for Five Agency Consordum Page 9 of 12 .............................. ..................................................................... ............................... I . ....... . ........... _............................... ................._......_.._.._ SIGNATURE PAGE TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. d/b /a Hennepin County Medical Center By: Kathy Wilde Date Chief Nursing Officer Interim Vice President for Professional and Support Services NG9 -1 -1 CMS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 10 of 12 ........ . . ............. ... ................ ........................... . ... ..... _.................... _................ SIGNATURE PAGE TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD .nhA By: Chair Date NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for Five Agency Consortium Page 11 of 12 ...... ............ ... ....................... SIGNATURE PAGE TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES, LLC By: Cliff Woodbury, Manager Date. I NG9 -1 -1 CHS Purchase Agreement for PNe Agency Consortium Page 12 of 12 , e o:p av To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. F. From: Debra Mangen Action. City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: June, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -55 Establishing Precinct 5 and Precinct 10 Polling Locations For The 2014 Election Cycle Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In May the Council approved a resolution moving polling locations for two of Edina's voting precincts. At the time it was anticipated that we would move only for the August Primary Election. Staff has discovered that we cannot switch polling locations between a primary and general election. In order to comply with' statute the Council is asked to adopt a resolution establishing the polling locations for the 2014 Election cycle keeping Precinct 5 at Good Samaritan Church and Precinct 10 at St. Albans Episcopal Church. Both churches have agreed to be our polling location for November. We are grateful for their hospitality. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -55 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -55 CHANGING LOCATIONS FOR EDINA PRECINCT 5 AND PRECINCT 10 Whereas Minnesota Statute 204B.16 Subdivision 1, authorized the governing body of each municipality to designate a polling place for each election precinct; and Whereas, the normal polling locations for Edina Precinct 5 and Edina Precinct 10 will be under construction during the August 12, 2014 Primary; and Whereas, Minnesota Statutes require the same polling location to be used for both the Primary and General Election during any State General Election cycle. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the polling location for Edina Precinct 5 shall be Good Samaritan Church located at 5730 Grove Street, Edina, Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the polling location for Edina Precinct 10 shall be St. Albans Church located at 6716 Gleason Road, Edina, Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of Edina hereby establishes the following polling locations: Precinct IA Precinct I B Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 Precinct 7 Precinct 8 Precinct 9 Precinct 10 Precinct I I Precinct 12 Precinct 13 Precinct 14 Precinct 15 Precinct 16 Precinct 17 Precinct 18 Precinct 19 Shepherd of Hills Church Chapel Hills Church Edina Senior Center Covenant Church of Edina Weber Park Building Good Samaritan Church Countryside Elementary School Normandale Lutheran Church South View Middle School Concord Elementary School St. Albans Church New Covenant Church Arneson Acres Park Centennial Lake Park Centrum Edina Community Lutheran Valley View Middle School Cornelia Elementary School Southdale Hennepin Library Edinborough Park Great Hall Calvary Lutheran Church Dated: June 17, 2014. 500 Blake Road 6512 Vernon Avenue 5280 Grandview Square 4201 West 50th Street 4115 Grimes Avenue 5730 Grove Street 5701 Benton Avenue 6100 Normandale Road 4725 South View Lane 5900 Concord Avenue 6716 Gleason Road 6400 Tracy Avenue 471 West 70th Street 7499 France Avenue 4113 West 54th Street 6750 Valley View Road 7000 Cornelia Drive 7001 York Avenue South 7700 York Avenue South 6817 Antrim Road Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor REPORT RECOMMENDATION C, e _7. r) To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen, City Clerk Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: Appointment To Ara & Culture Commission ,888 Agenda Item#:_ . -IV. G. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Appoint Steve Suckow to the vacancy on the Arts & Culture Commission for a term ending February 1, 2016. Information / Background: Michael Frey received notice from Paul Peterson (Art & Culture Commission, term ending 2/1/2016) that he has sold his home in Edina and will be moving to Richfield. As such he will no longer be able to serve on the Arts & Culture Commission. Steve Suckow was interviewed in February 2014 and Arts & Culture Commission was his second choice of board or, commission. At the direction of the Council, Mr. Suckow was contacted and asked if he would be willing to fulfill the remainder of this vacancy until February 1, 2016. He is willing to be appointed. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: June 17, 2014 • 11 CORPOPA��9 • 1888 Agenda Item #: N.H. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Geographic Information Services (GIS) Database Design for Park System — Geographic Technologies Group Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: June 2, 2014 Company: Geographic Technologies Group Recommended Quote or Bid: Geographic Technologies Group General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: July 2, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $37,500 The Geographic Information System (GIS) inventory and database design will work in conjunction with the park master planning process and will build a comprehensive digital inventory of the City of Edina's parks, facilities, amenities and trail system. It will also compile demographics and other geographically based decision support information. This project will assist in providing the foundation for planning and decisions regarding the development of parks, trails and recreational opportunities. The scope of services includes a presentation to the Park Board, review and compilation of all pertinent digital data, database design, detailed park facility inventory including photographs, building of GIS data model, deploying ArcGIS Online Gallery for internal use and build a Story Map that illustrates the City of Edina's Parks & Recreation facilities which will be available for resident use. Geographic Technologies Group will also provide support to the park system master plan consultant. Geographic Technologies Group was hired by the City of Edina to complete a geographic information systems evaluation of capabilities and recommendations. That recently completed study included the evaluation of current GIS capabilities, staffing structure, vendor utilization, recommendation on how to grow the City's GIS, improve departmental GIS capabilities (internal services) and improve external services to citizens. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER City Attorney Roger Knutson prepared a contract for this project. Attachment: Geographic Technologies Group Scope of Services City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St _ Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 To- Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director . 952- 826 -0430 1 Fax 952- 826 -0385 AKattreh @EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning; Raising Families & Doing Business 1 To- Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director . 952- 826 -0430 1 Fax 952- 826 -0385 AKattreh @EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning; Raising Families & Doing Business GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP -NOME CITY OF EDINA PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN - GIS COMPONENT OVERVIEW The objective of the "GIS component" of the Park System Master Plan is to build a comprehensive digital inventory of the City of Edina's parks, recreation facilities, and trail system, as well as compiling demographics and other geographically based decision support information. The GIS will provide the basis and foundation for decision making and strategic planning regarding the development of parks, local and regional trail connections, and recreation opportunities. It will also complement the City's enterprise, scalable, and sustainable GIS initiative. It is anticipated that the City of Edina Parks and Recreation staff will work closely with Geographic Technologies Group (GTG) staff during each step of the project. SCOPE OF SERVICES • Step 1: Presentation to the Parks Board Present to the Parks and Recreation Department staff and Park Board Working Group the GIS scope of work and anticipated deliverables. GTG will demonstrate how this fits into the development of the City's Parks System Master Plan, including, but not limited to: o Public Involvement • Public Meetings • Design Initiatives • Project Based Maps and Mapping Products • Decision Support and Web Page Development Deliverable: Presentation • Step 2: Review and Compile all Pertinent Digital Data Review Existing Parks, Recreation, and Trail System GIS and related digital data. o Compile all required data into one central repository for use in Parks Master Planning, including, but not limited to the following: • Park Boundaries • Demographics • Park Usage • CAD Drawings • Digital Base Data Layers — Parcels • Pavement Management Data • Natural Areas Deliverable: GIS Compiled Database and Report 1 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP®MEi■ • Step 3: Enterprise Database Design: Design an Enterprise Parks and Recreation geodatabase for all Parks and Recreation data layers. GTG will review the geodatabase design with the department to ensure that all desired attribution is captured. Deliverable: Enterprise System Design • Step 4: Conduct Park Facility Inventory Conduct a physical on -site inventory of all parks within the City. Collect all data as described in the database design. GTG will capture photographs and populate the database with observations made in the field. Deliverable: GIS Field Inventory and Database of Selected Parks and Recreation facilities • Step 5: Build GIS Data Model Build a digital GIS model of all Parks and Recreation Facilities with data captured in step 4. Deliverable: Construction of all fields and existing GIS data layers • Step 6: ArcGIS Online Deploy an ArcGIS Online Gallery of Parks and Recreation Facilities Example Parks and Recreation Finder using ArcGIS Online: http: // trvitlive .arcgis.com /ParksFinder/ 2 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUPS■■:; ■ Deliverable: All GIS park data compiled into an ArcGIS Online Gallery of maps for use internally • Step 7: Story Map Deploy a Story Map that illustrates the City of Edina's Parks and Recreation facilities, accessible by the public. Recreation Facilitiesi 1_,....e._. ..=ti. L3 ® q_. Example Parks and Recreation Story Map: http: / /maps.stalbert.ca /apps /recreation /facilities/ Deliverable: Story Map of all City Parks • Step 8: GIS Technical Support to the Parks System Master Plan Consultant Make all data available through an easy -to -use web browser solution to the selected consultant. Deliverable: Assist the Master Plan Consultant with access to all GIS data layers BUDGET • $37,500 SCHEDULE • 6 WEEKS —THREE STAFF & SENIOR MANAGER Ell I, ' kk ' ^ - To; Mayor and City Cound| d �emm�� IV-1. ' _ ` F, nom: Susan Fuuu Action 0 Assistant Parks' &Recreadon Director Discussion 13 Date: ]une'17 2014 Information [] ^ ` @rueniur Master Plan Task Force Appointment . ' ` Action Requested: Appoint the Braemar Master Plan 'task Force. Information / md: - ` —q Council members to select community members to participate onthe Braemar Master Plan Task Force. Twenty-nine individuals with varying backgrounds a.d experience uppied for the task force. The City Council sought. representation from variety of golfing demographics including youth/family, senior ' - men/women', compennve recreational and Fred Richards golfersPrevious planning experience and the ability to bring unew perspective to Braemar were also discussed. There was a great , 'deaofdiucusdominsolectngthetashforcedumtothevarmustdenrs, backgrounds, experiences nnd ski|bofthe � pool. ' ` - requests, that the follow� i���� � �� Council m�[� � appointed � �e B�� Master Plan Task ' Brenda M cCormick, Park Board `David Deeds, Park Board Rickhea / PacvErck ' kJoseph Hp|bert CUckBrozic Paul Presthus ` ' = To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of May 7, 2014 o e • ,MC�RPOiip`K�O • Ills Agenda Item #: IV. J. Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of May 7, 2014. Action Discussion ❑ Information-El Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the May 7, 2014 Traffic Safety Committee Report at their May 15 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: • Traffic Safety Committee Report of May 7, 2014 • Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of May 15, 2014 G:\ Engineering \lnfnstructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports\2014 \Item IV. J. Traffic Safety Report of May 7, 2014.dooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, May 7, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 7. The City Engineer, Police Traffic Supervisor, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and the Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendations have been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 15 Edina Transportation Commission and the June 17 City Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request to add "No Truck Traffic" signs at Washington Avenue and 3`d Street. This request comes from a resident living near the intersection of 3`d Street and Monroe Avenue. The resident has seen several semi - trucks and trailers going through this intersection and the neighborhood. This request was originally brought up in the March 11, 2014 traffic safety report during which time the staff recommended further study into the traffic issue before making a recommendation. Trucks and trailers driving through this neighborhood were made by a resident in December 2013. The requestor would like to see a "No Truck Traffic" sign placed at 3`d Street and Washington Avenue to help inform the truck drivers not to drive on the residential streets. Since the initial request was made, the requestor ,d called in twice to inform staff of additional trucks Picture:3 stand washingtonAvelooking west going down 3`d Street. A week traffic count was taken on 3`d Street to the east of Washington Avenue. this period the ADT was 463 vehicles and 3 semi -truck and trailers traveled 3`d Street. During Traffic Safety Report Page 1 of 7 May 7, 2014 Map: Proposed signage location at 3rd Street South and Washington Avenue South After discussion, staff recommends contacting Super Valu to request they place a sign on the corner of Washington Avenue and P Street to direct their vendor and delivery trucks to their entrance. A2. Request to improve the signage for the No Left Turn sign for the exit from Edina Liquor onto Gus Young Lane. This request comes from a resident who frequently uses the parking lot at the corner of Gus Young Lane and Vernon Avenue. The requestor states; people make left turns out of the Edina Liquor parking lot onto Gus Young Lane. There is a No Left Turn sign located under the stop sign as can be seen in the picture. The requestor would like to add to or improve the signage to help deter people from making this illegal turn. After discussion, staff recommends replacing the No Left Turn sign under the stop sign with a Right Turn Only sign. The entrance / exit to the parking lot will be striped, with a right turn arrow being added. Also, a No Left Turn sign will be placed directly across Gus Young Lane from the parking lot exit. Picture: No Left Turn Sign at Gus Young Lane Traffic Safety Report Page 2 of 7 May 7, 2014 A3. Request to add additional No Parking on school days signs on School Road to the corner of Concord Avenue. This request comes from Concord Elementary. The requestor states; there is a fairly large gap between the last no parking sign going east on School Road and the stop sign at Concord Avenue. Vehicles park I the gap; the cars cause a traffic problem during bus /parent drop off. The vehicles parked in this gap feel the no parking zone ends at the last no parking sign. The requestor would like to see additional no parking signs to the corner of School Road and Concord Avenue. Currently there is no parking on the north side of School Road and no parking on school days on the south side. It is approximately 200 feet from the last no parking sign to the corner of School Road and Concord Avenue. Picture: School Road facing east Neap: School Mood No Pocking Sign LocoUons The City of Edina follows the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Parking Restrictions as follows: Traffic Safety Report Page 3 of 7 May 7, 2014 The purpose of the on- street parking policy is to enhance the safety of drivers and pedestrians, as well as to allow for effective parking capacities at times when parking is in high demand. Parking restrictions may be warranted in the following conditions: A. Identified bus stops B. Prohibiting parking near an intersection to improve sight lines. C. Where the street is too narrow to allow safe passage if parking is permitted. D. On collector and arterial streets if the burb lane is required for thru traffic during peak periods. E. In conjunction with school and school pedestrian crosswalks. F. In conjunction with turning lanes and other lane restrictions when the curb lane is used for thru traffic. G. At connecting intersections to controlled access highways. H. On roadways designed with four or more lanes. Handicap parking is not permitted on a public street, and parking controls will not be installed for business, commercial, or industrial interest when it would adversely affect normal residential parking. After discussion, staff recommends the addition of one no parking sign midway between the last sign and the corner of Concord Avenue and School Road, the addition of a no parking 30 feet plaque under the stop sign at Concord Avenue. Also, switching the signs from "No Parking School Days" to "No Parking 8:00 am to 4:30 pm" to avoid confusion. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: B1. Request for a stop sign on Lynmar Lane at Hazelton oad. This request was recommended for denial by the Traffic Safety Committee in the February 5, 2014 report; however, City Council requested more detailed information regarding the two auto crashes at the intersection. Please see below. This request comes from a resident living near the intersection. The requestor states; vehicles dangerously turn onto Hazelton Road from Lynmar Lane at unsafe speeds. Drivers do not pay attention to traffic on Hazelton Road, making drivers on Hazelton Road yield to them to avoid collisions with pedestrians and parked cars. on Lynmar Lane. Picture: Hazelton Rd and Lynmar Ln from the east The requestor would like for a stop sign to be installed Currently this is an uncontrolled 3 way intersection which also has a driveway to an apartment complex on the north side. Hazelton Road, westbound curves to the north immediately after the intersection. Hazelton Road is 30 feet wide curb face to curb face, with parking on both 24 Hour Traffic Study Totals sides of the street. There is a sidewalk on the south side of Hazelton Road. Lynmar Lane is 29 feet wide, with no parking on the west side of the street. There are two recorded auto crashes at the intersection, more information on the auto crashes are listed in the appendix. Traffic Safety Report May 7, 2014 Page 4 of 7 Thru Right Left U- Turn Peds Total WB 77 - 211 3 3 294 EB 45 14 - 1 5 65 NB - 304 38 0 2 344 Page 4 of 7 B2. f Requirements for a stop sign can be found in the Appendix section 1A. - A 24 hour traffic count was performed at the intersection. During the study a combined total of 703 vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians entered the intersection from all approaches. This is.below the 2,000 units required. Below is the breakdown for daily total turning, movements at the intersection. The total traffic,from Hazelton Road and Lynmar1ane were nearly the same, 359 and 344 respectively. After discussion the staff recommends denying the request fora lack of,warrants. Request�to add speed limit signs and to investigate solving: the. speeding issues in the area of Wilryan Avenue and 66th Street. This request comes from a resident living near the intersection. The requestor states; there are no speed limit. signs in thearea.of Wilryan Avenue and 66th Street. People speed on'66th, and Wilryan Avenue, and the stop signs at this intersection are not always obeyed: The requester would like4or speed limit signs to be added to the area, also for staff to investigate ways to solve the speeding issues in the area. Currently there are stop signs located on Wilryan.Avenue and westbound 66th Street. 66th Street is a state -aid road. , Normandale Park is 2 blocks to the west of the intersection on 66th Street. 2013 counts to the east of Wilryan Avenue resulted in an ADT of 4297,vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 31.8 mph. 2013 counts to the west of Wilryan Avenue resulted in .an ADT of 3700 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 351 mph. A 2002 count of Wilryan Avenue north of 65th Street resulted in an ADT of 273 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 29.3 mph ..There are two,re_corded auto crashes at the intersection, both failures to yield the right of way, one.in2006 and, one in 2002. After discussion, staff recommends denying the request for adding a. speed limit sign given that. there is existing signage in the area. However, the dynamicspeed limit trailer.will be placed on 66thxStreet for..a period of time in the coming weeks. Traffic Safety Report May 7, 2014 ;Page 5 of 7 SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. D1. Request to remove Deaf Child sign at Grove Street and Garden Avenue, and to replace worn out children walking sign at Johnson Drive and Grove Street. The Deaf Child sign is still relevant, children walking sign and post will be removed. D2. Request was made for traffic counts for 42nd Street, Grimes Avenue, Wooddale Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. Staff discussed the traffic counts in the requested areas with the resident. Traffic Safety Report Page 6 of 7 May 7, 2014 D3. Request was made to add stop signs to the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and Garrison Lane. The requestor was forwarded a petition form. This intersection was recently denied for adding stop signs. D4. Request was made to install temporary stop signs- at 60th Street and France Avenue while' the Xerxes Avenue construction is going on. Staff talked with resident about detour for Xerxes Avenue being 501h Street. The situation will continue to be monitored to see if vehicles still get backed up at 601h Street trying to turn onto France Avenue. The county was informed of residents' concerns. APPENDIX Hazelton and Lvnmar Auto Crash History DATE YEAR SEVERITY TYPE ACT FACT ACT FACT Property Damage - Collision with motor vehicle Failure to yield right of way Vehicle -Going 4-Feb 2004 Vehicle - Starting in traffic Driver inattention or or No clear contributing factor No Apparent Injury iniransport - Right Angle lowing roadway aheadorfollowingroadway fo distraction 8-Jun 2010 Property Damage- Collision with motor vehicle Other action Failure to yield right of way Vehicle - Going straight No clear contributing factor No Apparent Injury in transport - Right Angle ahead or following roadway 1A. (MNMUTCD 2B.4) YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right -of -way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and /or C. An un- signalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more the 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right -of -way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and /or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right -of -way rule have been reported within a 3 -year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. Traffic Safety Report Page 7 of 7 May 7, 2014 DRAFT Edina Transportation Commission Minutes May 15 2014 . (Page 5 of 7) Traffic Safety Committee_ Report _ of May 7 2014 A -1: Planner Nolan was asked if they have the authority to say "no truck traffic" and,.he said it is a fuzzy area but they can ask SuperValu to direct their drivers to a certain route; the illustration will be rotated. On page 7, the report does not say who failed to yield because the information is not available. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded,by member Whited to forward the corrected May 7, 2014 report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members - None. Bike Edina .Working Group— Minutes of April 10, Member Janovy said Edina received a Bicycle Friendly Community bronze award from The League of American Bicyclists for its Bike Plan (on'ly Minnesota community to be awarded) and on June 3 there will be an official presentation at the City Council meeting. Living Streets Working Group The working group met May and revised the design guideline chapter, discussed how to communicate the benefits of Living Streets and reviewed the revised pedestrian plan. ;Communications Committee Member;LaForce said they are regrouping and revisitingpast and current recommendations were made that they've made for the,ETC, transportation, bike resource, City's website, etc, CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - Letter from resident Marena Arbelig The ETC discussed Ms. Arbelig's letter and the consensus was that it-rwas nice to receive' positive feedback and confirmation that the issues that they are working on matter to residents. A suggestion was to feature residents talking about getting around the community similar to the Hometown Heroes that are featured on the City's website. Member Whited will draft a response to Ms. Arbelig and member Boettge will review. Chair: Bass.asked for feedback regarding what to do with Mr. Thelemann's proposal. Planner Nolan was asked for staff's feedback since the proposal was shared with staff 'and he said staff did not see the issues in the same way as Mr. Thelemann. He said it seemed more,like residents are wanting a sidewalk but not..aiong their property. In reference to the crash data, planner Nolan said which side the sidewalk is on did not matter and other issues such as MNDOT land, and redesigning the. roadway makes it not feasible, and there are funding issues. Member Janovy wondered if there was,a gap in the ETC's, Engineering's and Mr. Thelemann's communication. Member La Force said he liked the connections in the proposal but would prefer not to walk along the freeway and he wondered what the motivation was because Mr. Thelemann was not in favor of the Birchcrest B sidewalk. Member Nelson said there is logic in his proposal with the connections. Planner Nolan said it was too late to fit this in because construction is starting next month. They discussed how to respond and if they should respond directly to Mr. Thelemann and decided that thanking him directly for his comments and their feedback in the minutes would suffice. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Spanhake invited the ETC to attend the Center for Transportation Study Research Conference next week and planner Nolan said he is scheduled to attend. She said she is interested in identifying a consistent protocol for using signs vs. and using date to decide which one to use. Member lyer said similar to standardizing crosswalks, they need to do the same for bike signs and have one or three 5 w9�N�,r� o e �Bae To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. K. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -67 Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -67 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements for sanitary sewer and water services for the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas. Information / Background: For the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas, residents were encouraged to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of -way line, as well as their water service line.- Some property owners have upgraded their service lines and requested that the extra cost be added to their special assessment. The attached signed agreements and resolution allow us to add the cost immediately as pending assessments. The final total special assessments will not be known until late 2015. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -67 Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements: • Five — Morningside B Neighborhood • One — Todd Park F Neighborhood • One — Strachauer Park B Neighborhood • One — Countryside F Neighborhood • One — Birchcrest B Neighborhood QTVIACENTRAL SVCS\ENG MAPROJECTSICONTRACTSUO MENG 14 -1 Morningside MADMIMLEGAUSewer RepalrAItem IV. K. Res. No. 2014 -67 Special Assessment Agreements.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 9INp'' r RCJVLV- V�fLV1Y-V/ APPROVING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS AND PENDING ASSESSEMENTS WHEREAS, at the request of Edina City Engineer, property owners in the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project-;areas were encouraged to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of -way line, as well as their water service line; and WHEREAS, property owners. have upgraded their service lines and requested that the extra cost be added to their special assessment; and WHEREAS, property owners signed a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement allowing the City to add the cost to their special assessment; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:. 1. The Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements are approved for the following properties: 1. PID 07- 028 -24 -44 -0105, 4310 Eton Place, $4,940.00 2. PID 07- 028 -24 -44 -0104; 4312 Eton Place, $5,295.00 3. PID 07- 028 =24 -41 =0030, 4227 Scott Terrace, $9,885.00 4. PID 07- 028 -24 -41 =0019, 4352 France Avenue, $7,550.00 5., PID 07- 028 -24 -44 -0124, 4107 Morningside Road, $6,895.00 6. PID 18- 028- 24 -22- 0028,4386 Coolidge Avenue, $4,450.00 7. PID 20- 028- 24 -34- 0097,6025- Abbott Avenue, $3,200.00 8. PID 32- 117 -21 -13 -0028, 5713 Hawkes Drive, $4,950.00 9. PID 33- 117 -21 -34 -0104, 6104 Wilryan Avenue, $6,790.00 2. The Assessments are deemed pending as of the date this Resolution is approved by the City Council: ADOPTED this 17`h day of June, 2014. Atte Debra A.,Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was 'duly.adopted byAhe Edina-City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this:'. day..of , 20_ City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro.BoWevard . Edina, Minnesota. 55439 r� wwwEdinaMN.gov• 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIALASSESSMENTAGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 201�4, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ('City') and Claience R & Amalia Falk, husband and wife, (the "Property Owne ). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner ofLa, Block, Subdivision Morningi_ de. having a street address of4310 Eton Place, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property'). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement') and also consider replacing waterservioe line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 144. C. Property Owner has replaced their;,anit3p/ sewer service to and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water 3233 45th Avenue South. Minneapolis. MN 55406 (the "Contractor) to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2Sz.QZ was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2607 for the amount of SA 940.00. The City is in receipt of alien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $A 940.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 144. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 144, Including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT, RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. PROPERTY OWNE Clarence R. Falk nn Amalia Falk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HW►WIr4) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 2' day of M R1 2014 by L M.n 5tM-c- L u tit NOTARY PUBLIC BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA t} LAMBERT C. LUM NC)TARY PuBUC- MINNESOTA My Commission Exores Jan. 81, 2015 ne+ew++w►>a The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .20 by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf ofthe corporation and pursuant to the auth ority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRARED BY: CAMPBELL xNJTSON Pl* ..lA, -.W- 317 ER9andab 091. CArW 13BDC.p.de0.t.Q.. Fagry V—dh 65121 Td.0— :43U)45x6000 FNK- MEMO klAY 6 2014 CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC WORKS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this Ott' day of IMF , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") d Peter W Forssark and Mary J Forsmark, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot, Block , Subdivision Morningside, having a street address of 4312 Eton Place, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -1. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Highview Plumbing, Inc., 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.2600 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2600 for the amount of $5,295.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,295.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -1. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -1, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. PROP TY WNER: Peter W Forsmark Mary Y96rsmark STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( sS. COUNTY OF E rJ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 0 day of CITY OF EDINA M AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association '17 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve Cagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC OA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 9-, day-of , 20 1`t, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal. corporation ( "City ") and Jill M Spain Yanish, a single person, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 19, Block , Subdivision Morningside, having a street address of 4227 Scott Terrace, Edina, Minnesota the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the. right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -1. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer and water service lines and has requested that the City assess the cost of�the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Highview Plumbing, Inc., 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka; MN 55345, (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement: Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.2599 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2599 for the amount of $9,885.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $9,885.00 against the Subject Property. -The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -1. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -1, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY O Q N ) The foregoing instrument 2014, by SHARON M. ALLISON NOTARY PUBW- MINNESOTA _ !4lyCummissionEJan.91,2015 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) PROPERTY OWNER: Jill ain Yanis before m this ,WAS lA 0 NOTARY PUBLIC CITY OF EDINA „I day of James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center '80 Corporate Center Curve gan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC 0a PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ECEIVED AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT MAY 2 0 2014 CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT made this day of 20 , by and between ITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Michael & Bonita Phillips, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 013, Block , Subdivision Morningside. having a street address of 4352 France Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -1. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer and water service lines and. has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Beniamin Franklin, 1424 3rd Street North, Minneapolis, MN 55411, (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.2601 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2601 for the amount of $7,650.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,550.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -1. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -1, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF POONepla ) The foregoing instrument was MAY , 204, by yr^ .iv.,.r - ✓„ err ._.c�ir✓.,�r.�..rr..rr..i�..; STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) PROPERTY OWNER: " 21� Bonita Phillips , Michael Phillips -d before me this 101 day of ifli,o.S gnGL Ban�� Pti;11i,2S NOTARY PUBLIC CITY OF EDINA W James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 17 Eagandale Office Center 380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of tk --,� , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City") and Andrew S & Mary C' Warner, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot, Block, Subdivision Morningside, having a street address of 4107 Morning-side Road, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14-1. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Highview Plumbing, Inc., 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2608 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2608 for the amount of $6,895.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT., The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,895.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14-1. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14-1, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 PROP OWNER: Andrew S. Warner /do A/A Mary C. W rner STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20j�, by �crN v^ a- &lA v U �_• i jNXn W NOTARY PUBLIC . RIIAN�IiAICE � '� worurrau®uc r�r � *a moo OF EDINA �nraollrrao�smmne BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 W K:sm .PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of Tune , 20Jf, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Timothy J & Robyn Leer, husband and wife, ((OWNER 2» (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 10i ;, Block 009, Subdivision Browndale Park, having a street address of 4386 Coolidae Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -7. C: Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water. (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2615 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2615 for the amount of $4,450.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,450.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -7. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No..ENG 14 -7, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ( SS. COUNTY OF kAti -e t n ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20A by �%"i w� •lJ�a �: Zee, a .. J R- i x., a L'oe r � � .r STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) v{ /vv vw OTARY PUBLIC BY: CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation; on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 'NK:sm PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this l 9 day of `M !!fj _ , 20 —d, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ")) and Carol G. Lundquist, single person, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 026, Block 003, Subdivision Town Realty's Edina Terrace, having a street address of 6025 Abbott Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2603 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2603 for the amount of $3,200.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,200.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov. 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OF by PROPERTY OWNER: IXc� y Carol G. L dquist The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this SEMIH MAN NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/31116 A CITY OF EDINA BY: AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) f day of N\AY , 201 , James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 VK:srn PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 1, 20_, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and David G Madson & Terry L Parker, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 005, Block 002, Subdivision Hawke's Lake Addition, having a street address of 5713 Hawkes Drive, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -3. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. . PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 4e Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2609 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2609 for the amount of $4,960.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,950.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -3. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF�� egoing instrum�t w by 2 R L ` M. ALLISON NOTARY PUSUC- MINNESOTA (tay Commission Expires Jed. 91.2015 STATE OF 1 ` 1 ) (ss. COUNTY OF T foregoi�g by �. r ��f Terry L arker ;knowledged before me this , day of 0. , 20� T NOTARY PU LIC David G Madson ;d ed before me this o�'1 day of ; g .y CN NOTARY PUBLIC A] MyConddi�bn �etM�n.9l CITY OF EDINA BY: om STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 20, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Li a N. Buck and Gregory L. Buck, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot, Block 002, Subdivision Mikulav's Addition, having a street address of 6104 Wilryan Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer and water service lines and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Highview Plumbing, Inc., 4301 Hiqhview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.2602 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2602 for the amount of $6,790.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6.790.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 PROPE OV YN L Li N. buck Gregory uck STATE OF MINNESOTA (Ss. COUNTY OF �,-� n iv. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ste'"` day ofa.�, , 20 1 by NOTARY PUBLIC KATHRYN M. MANENIANN Nary Publio-Minnesata . + MY CM.M W EWres Jan 91, 201b CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to-the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 elephone: (612) 452 -5000 '.NK:srrr To: City Council Agenda Item #: IV. L. From: Karen M. Kurt Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Professional Services Agreement with Future iQ Partners for City Vision Project Action Requested: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Future iQ Partners. Information / Background: In March, City staff issued a Request for Information (RFI) for consulting services to assist with the City vision project. This project is one of six key City Council goals for the 2014 -15 period. Staff received ten responses to the RFI. Proposed costs for the project ranged from $42,440 to $95,000 with a median Proposed cost of $75,031. The following staff interviewed eight of the responding firms: • Cary Teague, Community Development Director • Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager • Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Manager Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner • Annie Coyle, City Management' Fellow • Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager Staff unanimously recommends Future iQ Partners to serve as the consulting partner. Future iQ Partners has a track record of designing and implementing large scale community visioning projects with a global clientele spanning three continents. David Beurle, CEO of Future iQ Partners, will serve as the project coordinator and facilitator. The cost of the consulting services contract will be $75,000. Attachment • Professional Services Agreement with Future iQ Partners City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 s N We ■ To: City Council Agenda Item #: IV. L. From: Karen M. Kurt Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Professional Services Agreement with Future iQ Partners for City Vision Project Action Requested: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Future iQ Partners. Information / Background: In March, City staff issued a Request for Information (RFI) for consulting services to assist with the City vision project. This project is one of six key City Council goals for the 2014 -15 period. Staff received ten responses to the RFI. Proposed costs for the project ranged from $42,440 to $95,000 with a median Proposed cost of $75,031. The following staff interviewed eight of the responding firms: • Cary Teague, Community Development Director • Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager • Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Technology Services Manager Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner • Annie Coyle, City Management' Fellow • Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager Staff unanimously recommends Future iQ Partners to serve as the consulting partner. Future iQ Partners has a track record of designing and implementing large scale community visioning projects with a global clientele spanning three continents. David Beurle, CEO of Future iQ Partners, will serve as the project coordinator and facilitator. The cost of the consulting services contract will be $75,000. Attachment • Professional Services Agreement with Future iQ Partners City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 17 day of June, 2014, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City") and Future iQ Partners, a corporation under the laws of the State of Wisconsin ( "Consultant "). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to facilitate a City visioning process and produce a City vision document. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement B. Project Summary In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document "A" having the first priority and Contract Document "B" having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000), inclusive of reimbursables', taxes and all other charges (the "fee ".). This fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated hour to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. 4: OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement'shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall be the copyright owner. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval.- 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 176626v1 7. STANDARD OF, CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional- consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant's services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance: of the services provided for .herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising hereunder. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts notless than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence /aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing work the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City . and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods. of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and. incidentals necessary for Consultant's performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent, that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self - employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not, enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten days of Consultant's receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not . paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 2 1766260 12. CONTROLLING LAWNENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for -Hennepin County 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 13,. as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2). all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is.subject to all the provisions. of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not;limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a,;government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify ,City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant's, officers', agents', city's,- partners.', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall . survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. .Consultant shall. defend` actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or-process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name,'the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and,a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from-.any and all claims for infringement by, reason of the use of any such patented designed,. device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 17. WAIVER. Any. waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the 3 176626v1 provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 19. TERNUNATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City, for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall-pay the Consultant for completed work Dated: 520. CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor BY: Dated: , 20—. 4 176626v1 Scott Neal, City Manager BY: Its future->iQ ••.. •• can Karen Kurt Assistant City Manager, City of Edina 4801 W, 50t' St Edina MN 55424 Dear Ms. Kurt, Future iQ Partners, Inc. 4228 Southtowne. Drive Eau Claire, W1 54701 www.future- io.com USA Federal Tax Identification Number EIN 27: 1389416 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA - COMMUNITY VISION It is our pleasure to present this project outline for the City of Edina - Community Vision. This lays out the proposed approach and background. . We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City of Edina on this initiative. Yours sincerely, David Beurle CEO, Future iQ Partners, Inc. david @future- ig.com Tel: 715 559 5046 11 June 2014 R City of Edina —Community Visioning 'Project Table of Contents 1.0 Description of anticipated community visioning process ................... ..............................1 2.0 Innovative community engagement techniques used successfully in the past ................. 2 3.0 How FiQ would envision reaching the participation target of 1200 residents .................. 3 4.0 Summa of additional information needed prior to engagement .... ............................... 3 Summary ,. 5.0 Summary of what differentiates FIQ from other peers in the field .... ............................... 3 6.0 Examples of past similar projects, including links to final work products ......................... 4 6.1 Kewaunee Region —Wisconsin (2013) ................................................. :.................................. 4 6.2 The Community Progress Initiative — Wisconsin ( 2003- 09) ........................ ............................... 4 6.3 Future West Cork — Ireland ( 2009 -12) ...................................................... ............................... 4 6.4 Palliser Future Project — Palliser Region, Alberta Canada (2009 -12) .......... ............................... 4 6.5 Mid -Iowa Growth Partnership — Iowa, USA (2009 -11) .............................. ............................... 4 7.0 Project Team — Future iQ Partners ................................................... ............................... 5 7.1 David Beurle, CEO Future iQ Partners ...................................................... ............................... 5 7.2 Dr. Jeffrey A. sachse — Senior Economist .................................................. ............................... 5 7.3 Celine Beurle, COO Future iQ Partners ..................................................... ............................... 6 7.4 Marc Rassel, Creative Director, Future iQ Partners ................................... ............................... 6 7.5 Lehna Malmkvist, Expert Team Member, Future 1Q Partners .................... ............................... 7 7.6 Dr Freija van Duijne ................................................................................ ............................... 7 8.0 Budget and Timeline of the project .................................................. ............................... 8 8.1 Budget .................. 8.2 Proposed timeline of project ................................................................... ............................... 9 1.0. Description of anticipated community visioning process Future- iQ.Partners will be using a customized visioning process, based on our successful FutureShift approach. This approach has been applied'in numerous.large scale visioning projects in USA, Canada, Europe and Australia. Future Shift = Methodological Approach FutureShift , AA i•I f 7dc I:1 IILt1IM IIp11F► - LINIIM This process is built on proven methodologies and an innovative set of tools; which Future iQ Partners has developed over many years of practical; application and research. The process works through a number of key steps, including: • Looking —this phase helps people to look to the future. Using the Future Game, people understand the importance of future thinking. This is coupled with background research to assess capacity and appetite for change- Shaping — using our scenario planning process, Decision Path, we explore plausible futures and implications. This provides an insight into the likely future pathways, and,the identification of implications, and actions required to move towards a preferred future. • Engaging — extensive stakeholder engagement is achieved through workshops, focus group sessions and online survey mechanisms. In excess of 1200 people will be engaged in this phase, using specialized survey instruments, workshops and neighborhood discussions. • Shifting — data from surveys and Workshops are analyzed and provides a robust basis to the vision formulation -. Through techniques such as text and data analysis, we are able to create an evidence- based and scientifically robust approach to vision formulation. • Living —.key priority areas and future action steps are identified, which can then be incorporated in the Comprehensive Planning process. This phase begins to turn the vision into reality, and assists the on- ground execution of action plans.- The key aspects and features of our approach includes: • It is highly customizable; and would be built around a unique 'Edina Futures Project', or some similar branding that captures the essence of the project. • It is scientifically and evidence based, ensuring a robust outcome, and a vision statement that deals with reality, rather than a 'wish - list.' • Engagement is front and center in the design, and citizens have the option to have input via multiple methods. It is also easily scalable, and can draw input from all sections of the community; from classrooms to- boardrooms. • Outputs include high quality reports, data analysis and presentations (including innovative visualization of the future), where citizen input is valued and reflected_ in the final outcomes. City of Edina- Community Vision — Project proposal by future iQ Partners, 11 June, 4014 2.0 Innovative community engagement techniques used successfully in the past. Our approach to vision development: • Future iQ Partners provides an innovative, scenario based approach for developing community visions. This begins with the Futures Game, which opens up an understanding to the future implications of decisions.made today, and stimulates recognition of the importance of long -term vision. • Working with a core representative and invited local 'expert' group (50 -100 people), the scenario plan ning,process develops a series of plausible futures for the Edina City area. The scenarios include detailed examination of the triple bottom line of economy, environment and society. This process allows an understanding of the key 'drivers' shaping the future, both from an 'inward' and 'outward' perspective. • These scenarios are then used as the basis for engagement, where citizens are invited to consider and respond to the scenarios. This helps focus the engagement and input process. Future iQ Partners experience shows that the scenario based approach to visioning has significant advantages including: • Allows citizens choice, and the chance to engage with a series of well thought out and researched plausible futures. This accelerates the process of visioning, and allows people to consider longer -term choices and implications, rather than short -term self- interest agendas. It naturally leads to high quality visualizations approaches, where the future can have a tactile and interpretable representation. Our approach to engagement: • Face -to face workshops are the backbone of meaningful engagement. The sessions are focused and participant input is collected for inclusion in the overall survey database. • Future iQ Partners complements direct face -to -face workshops with an on -line portal and surveys platform. This allows convenient 24/7 inputs, thereby increasing participation in the process. All community input is entered into the survey platform, allowing for detailed analysis of themes and issues. It is searchable by demographic information to tease out differing views and perspectives of the future between population cohorts. • The development of unique branding for the visioning process maximizes the exposure and 'stickiness', which has proven to stimulate new community involvement and create a desire to 'get on board' and be part of implementation. Future iQ Partners has used this overall process, and the various elements, numerous times in major community vision projects. The tools and approaches are 'tried and tested' and produce high quality data and outcomes. City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 3.0 How FIQ would envision reaching the participation target of 1200 residents. Future iQ Partners is familiar with large engagement processes for community visioning. Extensive stakeholder engagement is achieved through multiple workshops, focus group sessions and online survey mechanisms. As important as the absolute number, Future iQ Partners will ensure the sample is largely representative of the City population base, and reflects the stratification of age, ethnic and socio- economic profiles. To achieve the target 1200 residents (and therefore data - points), the following face -to -face engagement approaches will be used: • `Edina Futures' workshop (scenario planning). • Larger town hall meetings. • Specialized sessions to reach groups traditionally harder to engage. • Industry and business community workshops. • It is proposed to train a team of volunteer facilitators to lead neighborhood discussions. • Engagement with schools and youth. Future iQ Partners will use online surveys to allow for broad based participation into the process. Expertly designed survey instruments capture resident perspectives and visions. Survey . participation promoted through social media exponentially increases the community input into the process. In addition, it is suggested that the City of Edina communication channels be used to promote the visioning process, and drive traffic to the project website. 4.0 Summary of additional information needed prior to engagement • Community Profile – Demographics, prominent assets, competitive advantages and citizen profile, benchmarked against other cities in the Twin City region. • Current Comprehensive Plan and access to City communication channels to reach citizens in the Edina City area. 5.0 Summary of what differentiates FiQ from other peers in the field. • Future iQ Partners has extensive practical first -hand experience in working on community visioning efforts, across the Midwest and North America. • We link global best practice with customised and practical actions on the ground. • Strong facilitation and presentation skills, and a track record of working across all levels of society. • Future iQ Partners is a recognised market leader in applying unique and innovative tools and approaches to assist communities. shape their futures. • Our tools and projects have won numerous awards. City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 3 6.0 Examples of past similar projects, including links to final work products. In addition to the listed recent projects (below), Future iQ Partners is currently working on large scale community visioning, engagement and planning projects in Alberta (Canada), Spain, Italy and Australia. 6.1 Kewaunee Region – Wisconsin (2013) Following the announced closure of a regional nuclear power station, Future iQ Partners was contracted to design and lead a three - county long -term regional planning effort as part of the economic response strategy. This work included stakeholder engagement, future planning and focus group sessions involving over 400 people. A comprehensive vision -based regional action plan has been developed to align the region and key organisations around economic innovation and collaboration. http: // future- ig.com /projects /kewaunee- nuclear- power - station - closure/ 6.2 The Community Progress Initiative – Wisconsin (2003 -09) The Future iQ Partners team were the key designers and facilitators of this initiative, which was created to address the substantial local economic impact of the downturn in the paper manufacturing industry. This region is home to several very large paper making businesses, and is a renowned Cranberry producing region. The Community Progress Initiative played a role to define a new vision, and act as a catalyst in shifting culture from dependent to self - reliant, building new and engaged civic processes. http: // future- ig.com /projects / commun ity- progress- initiative - wisconsin -usa/ 6.3 Future West Cork — Ireland (2009 -12) This regional visioning project drew together stakeholders from across the West Cork Region (pop >100,000). It explored the long -term future and designed, facilitated and implemented an intensive engagement process; with some 800 people have comprehensive input. The economy of the region has been undergoing major financial turmoil. The future planning work was coupled with extensive local community engagement sessions. http:H future- ig.com /projects /future- west -cork/ 6.4 Palliser Future Project – Palliser Region, Alberta Canada (2009 -12) Beginning in late 2009, Future iQ Partners designed and led a scenario - planning session in the Palliser Region, Alberta, Alberta. The included the Futures Game and core Scenario - Planning, which scoped out a range of plausible futures for the region over a 20 -year period. It then embarked on an 18 -month engagement, training, network mapping, and action - building process to bring the region together around a common vision. The outcomes were sustainable action plans, and engaged over 700 people. http: // future- ig.com /projects /palliser- futures- proiect/ 6.5 Mid -Iowa Growth Partnership — Iowa, USA (2009 -11) The Mid Iowa Growth Partnership (MIGP) was designated a regional collaborative by the State of Iowa. MIGP consists of nine counties located in north - central Iowa that came together as a nine - county regional marketing collaborative. The region has a population of 175,000 and a potential labor force of over 300,000. Future iQ Partners was part of a team engaged by the MIGP region to undertake a regional innovation planning process. Future iQ Partners work focused on the process of building a shared vision for the future of the Mid Iowa Growth Partnership (MIGP) region, and community engagement. http: // future- ig.com /proiects /mid -iowa- growth - partnership -usa/ NOTE: These projects can be viewed in more detail on the company website Projects page, with additional reports and material available in the Resource Section. www.future- ig.com City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 7.0 Project Team — Future iQ Partners 7.1 David Beurle, CEO Future iQ Partners Role on this project • Overall Project Management and contract management. • Project design and reporting, including workshop sessions and reports. • Design and content of community engagement sessions. • Lead facilitation at all major workshops. Qualifications • Ten years as CEO Future iQ Partners— developed many of the approaches and global presence of the company • Eight years as Principal Project Officer to Minister for Primary Industry • Past Board Director, Western Australian Community Foundation. • Bachelor of Science in Agriculture David specializes in creating future planning approaches for use in regional, community and organizational settings. He pioneered the application of scenario planning to regions and rural industries around the world, and developed the Future Game as a widely used planning and workshop tool. David is a dynamic public speaker who inspires audiences, and has worked in the field of organizational and regional economic and community planning for over 20 years. His work in the community economic development field has earned international, national and state awards. 7.2 Dr. Jeffrey A. Sachse — Senior Economist Role on this project • Research and survey design support. Qualifications • Doctorate in Political Science (UW Milwaukee) • Masters of Public Affairs (UW Madison) • Over ten year experience as a practicing and academic Economist • Extensive experience in economic data analysis Jeffery specializes in detailed economic analysis and data interpretation. He has worked extensively in the region including work on industry clusters, regional partnerships, workforce development and economic trends and indicators. He has led research and development projects in transportation, and conducted program monitoring. His has detailed local knowledge of the economic landscape in eastern Wisconsin, having worked professionally in this area for over a decade. City of Edina — Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 7.3 Celine Beurle, COO Future iQ Partners Role on this project • Support for the Scenario Planning workshop. • Management of survey process and communications strategy. • Project management support. Qualifications • BA Honors Degree in Sociology and Philosophy– UCC • Masters Degree in Sociology– University College Cork • Managing Director of Future iQ Partners. • Six years running Specialized Employment and Recruitment Service • Policy planning and implementation for government party for 5 years. With a background in project management, Celine brings many years of experience in leading a company. Celine was previously the Executive Director of a company that provided specialized employment services in southern Ireland. Celine has a background in Sociology and Philosophy, with a Masters degree. She has led many major projects and initiatives within her career, and is passionate about helping to create powerful and effective future strategies for communities and organizations. 7.4 Marc Rassel, Creative Director, Future iQ Partners Role on this project • Scenario and data visualisation. • Support of communications strategy. Qualifications • Bachelor of Fine Art (UW – Stout) • Creative Director Future iQ Partners • CEO Align Multimedia • 13 years experience in web design and data visualization Marc is a pioneer in developing networks of creative professionals to bring, even the smallest clients, teams of top -notch expertise. He has actively studied the relationships between design and human psychology to develop a keen sense of how design can influence and often create a desired reaction. With over 13 years of experience in the advertising and printing industries, Marc has worked in nearly all areas from concept and planning through production and delivery. Through these experiences he has gained a vast and intimate knowledge of strategies of any scope to be developed, executed and results delivered. He is an accomplished designer and Creative Director who traces his roots back to the University of Wisconsin – Stout where he obtained a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree. City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 7.5 Lehna Malmkvist, Expert Team Member, Future iQ Partners Role on this project • Background research on the future of urban communities. • Background research on indicators of community success. Qualifications • MSc and BSc in Biology, Geography and Environmental Studies– University of Victoria • Expert in Environment and Systems with Future iQ Partners – Canada / Germany • Founder of Swell Consulting Ltd –Victoria, Canada • Principal Vegetation and Aquatic Ecologist at Swell Consulting Ltd Victoria, Canada Lehna has worked for over 10 years within multi - disciplinary teams across a wide range of projects. She has used her skills to ensure that innovative, whole- system approaches are integrated into projects to take account of triple bottom line principles, addressing social, ecological and economic aspects. She brings a deep understanding of connections and the experience to balance government planning and policies and practical on- the - ground actions, including developing the business case, for true sustainability. She uses her expertise to guide community building and planning processes using facilitation techniques to develop a common understanding of fundamental issues and create solutions as a unified team. 7.6 Dr Freija van Duijne Role on this project • Background research on the future of urban communities. • Background research on indicators of community success. Qualifications • Founding member / President of the Dutch Future Society • M.A. in Cognitive psychology from Leiden University • Ph.D. in Applied ergonomics and design from Delft University, specializing in risk perception. • Co- promoter of a Ph.D. project exploring the implications for cross learning between trend - watching and futurist communities. Freija has been project leader for foresight studies for the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Economic Affairs. Her focus has been on innovation, consumer products and lifestyle, food systems, regional economics, and new business developments. She has led a range of large projects that involved scenario planning, technology assessment, expert reflections and future strategy. City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 8.0 Budget and Timeline of the project 8.1 Budget The following is an indicative budget breakdown. This assumes the City of Edina covers the costs of facilities and materials for workshops and meetings. Future iQ Components Calculation Total Preparation and planning with • Liaison with local host organization – planning and $2,500 City of Edina preparation and background research Content support for the • Using the City of Edina's communication platforms, $5,000 project website, social media FiQ will support the development of a and engagement portal communications strategy, and contribute teaser future orientated information and surveys questions. .Background research elements • FiQ will undertake unique research to explore future $5,000 to contribute to the contextual urban trends and current thinking on 'urban cities of knowledge for the project. the future'. In addition, a review will be conducted of existing metrics used to examine urban success and benchmark values. Edina Futures workshop – • Develop and facilitate major future planning session, $25,000 based on scenario thinking including pre - surveys, workshop, and report. This will include extensive data visualization and representation of alternate futures. Community Engagement • Extensive community engagement including multiple $25,000 'town- hall'sessions, industry and business groups, and training cadre of local volunteer neighborhood facilitators. • Extensive online surveys conducted Final vision report preparation • Final data analysis, vision report development and $7,500 future visualization. Presentation . Present final report and vision launch $5,000 TOTAL USD$ $75,000 Payment schedule - Future iQ Partners proposes 3 milestone payments of $25,000 each. Proposed dates for the payments are: • Payment 1- upon signing of contract. • Payment 2 –end September; upon delivery of scenario planning report • Payment 3 –end January 2015; upon delivery of final report City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 8 8.2 Proposed timeline of project The following chart outlines key phases and periods of ,activities. . PHASE / Months (2014) Jun Jul ' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Project Planning and liaison with City of Edina; including presentations to Council, Senior Leadership Team and key .; stakeholders. Development of project timeline and communication strategy. Background research, including contextual studies; review of existing urban metrics and data; review of existing i trends and implications. Contribute to future orientated teaser articles and informative elements within the City of Edina 4€ f communication platforms.* Futures workshop - preparation and delivery; including IS pre- survey of participants. IN 'Edina Futures Report' prepared; train local facilitators in neighborhood conversations. Extensive Community engagement; including multiple neighborhood and sector workshops, and online broad community engagement (including where possible schools and other interest groups) Data analysis; final vision formulation; future visualization elements. Presentation - Launch of vision Note: Major community engagement work is timed to avoid summer vacation periods. City of Edina – Community Vision — Project proposal by Future iQ Partners, 11 June, 2014 9 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager o e7, Agenda Item #: IV. M. Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution 2014 -68 - Approving a Special Law Authorizing Tax Increment Financing Districts for Housing Purposes and Expenditures from the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District Action Requested: Approve Resolution 2014 -68. Information / Background: The City established the Southdale 2 TIF District in 2012 with the intention of attracting new investment and stimulating job growth in the greater Southdale area. This TIF District is anticipated to generate significant revenue with the completed renovations to Southdale Center and new construction of One Southdale Place apartments. While this area has greater growth potential, the state legislation that governs this TIF District no longer allows new projects to be financially supported. State Senator Melisa Franzen and State Representative Ron Erhardt sponsored special legislation in the 2014 state legislation session to establish a Special Law that would allow the City to continue to support new investments in affordably - priced housing in Edina. Those efforts were successful and resulted in a Special Law. This new law will allow Edina to establish new TIF Districts throughout the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area to further the goals of affordably - priced housing in Edina. Based on the high real estate value in many areas of Edina, the new law lowers the threshold from 40% to 205/c of affordably- priced units in new multi - family developments. The new law also allows for pooling of incremental taxes from the Southdale 2 District to support new housing elsewhere in Edina. At this time, no specific sites have been identified. However, it is anticipated that this new law will allow more housing options to be constructed in the future. City approval of this Special Law is required before it formally goes into effect. Attachments: 2014 Special Laws, excerpt (Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8) Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Proposed Resolution 2014 -68 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 2014 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8 Sec. 8. CITY OFEDINA: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31. 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on June 30, 2017. Subd. 2. Rules governing districts. (a) Housing districts established under this section are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 to 469.1794, except:as otherwise provided in this subdivision. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176. subdivision 1 b, no increment must be paid, to the authority -after 20 years after receipt by the authority of the first increment from a district established under this section. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1761, subdivision 3, for a residential rental project, the city may elect to substitute "20 percent" for "40 percent" in the 40 -60 test under section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code in determining the applicable income limits. (d) The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1761, subdivision 3, apply for a 25 -year period beginning on the date of certification of the district. Subd. 3. Pooling authority. The city may elect to treat expenditures of increment from the Southdale 2 district for a housing project of a district established under this section as expenditures qualifying underMinnesota Statutes, section 469.1763, subdivision 2, paragraph (d): (1) without regard to whether the housing meets the requirement of a qualified building under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code: and (2) may increase by an additional 25 percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the district permitted under that section. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon compliance by the governing body of.the city of Edina with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. W 94 Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and Southdale 2 TIF District ok/ e tA w�E J1 J� Q Project Area S Southdale 2 TIF District Engineering Dept. March, 2012 This page intentionally left blank. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -68 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL LAW AUTHORIZING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS FOR HOUSING PURPOSES AND EXPENDITURES FROM THE SOUTHDALE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT WHEREAS; Article X11, Section 2 of the Minnesota Constitution and Minnesota Statutes §645.021 authorize a local government unit to enact a special law affecting the local government unit following approval by resolution adopted by a majority vote of all members of the governing body; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature approved. a special law, Minn. Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8 providing that the City of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014; and WHEREAS, the special law is effective upon approval of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (THE "CITY ") AS FOLLOWS: I. 2014 Minnesota Laws,. Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8 (the "Special Law "), which authorizes the City to establish one or more new housing.tax increment districts in the current boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and authorizes expenditures from the Southdale 2 tax increment financing district, subject to certain special rules, is hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file with the Secretary of State a certified copy of this resolution and the appropriate certificate in the form prescribed by the State Attorney General no later than December 31, 2014. Dated:, June 17, 2014 James B. Hovland, Mayor ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN (ss. CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June IT 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk l To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL o e O Agenda Item #: V. A. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Receive Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Year Ended December 31, 2013 Action Requested: Recommend receipt of 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). James Eichten, CPA, from Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A., (MMKR) the Principal in charge of the audit, will be present at the meeting to present the CAFR and Management Report. Information / Background: Attached is the following Independent Auditors' Management Report Independent Auditors' Special Purpose Audit Reports 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report can be viewed on the City's web site. The purpose of each report is as follows: The Management Report is a report by the auditors to communicate information relevant to city finances and to provide comments resulting from their audit process. The Special Purpose Audit Reports is the result of the extensive audit performed to assess the City's internal controls and to assure compliance with all of the State's and Federal Government's statutes, laws and regulations. The auditors this year did not identify any occurrences where the City did not comply with State statutes and Federal laws and regulations. The auditors also did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that they consider to be material weaknesses. The 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is the accumulation of all Finance functions compiled in a format prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, The State of Minnesota, and The Federal Government The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report consists of a number of sections: The Introductory Section has a letter from the Finance Director, the copy of the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the December 31, 2012 report, a listing of elected and appointed officials and an organization chart. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The Financial Section includes the Auditors' Opinion and Management's Discussion and Analysis letter. The Basic Financial Statements is the part of the report that details the 2013 accounting for the City, as well as the. notes to the financial statements. The Required Supplementary Information includes the budgetary comparison schedule for the General Fund along with the related notes. The Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules are the financial statements for the non - major funds. The Supplementary Financial Information includes various schedules of debt, assessed valuation and TIF funds. The Statistical Section has a number of schedules again required by the above mentioned boards and governments. To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: May "Speak Up, Edina" Report rk 01 Agenda Item #: V. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Action Requested: Receive report on May 2014 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about the Edina Senior Center Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014 -2015 is Communication and Engagement: 'To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUp.Edina.org. In May 2014, the discussion topic centered on the Edina Senior Center. In this online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? • What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current "Senior Center model" be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? • What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? • If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? The discussion was open for comments between May I and June 2. During that time, 131 comments were made both on and offline. Additionally, 576 people visited the site 784 times, garnering 2,971 page views. All the visitors to the site during that period were from Edina (according to their internet provider). The discussion was promoted through various means, including a press release, Edition: Edina, Facebook, Twitter and NextDoor posts, City Extra messages and direct outreach at the Edina Senior Center. Attached are the comments on this topic. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 1T-Qme . • Dlscasslom sqnWM • Ideas • Stavevs Email remail a_ddress...__ Password password... or, .S1 Connect Sign In Like - Tweet] Share s +� ;ol \L vo NMI This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Edina Senior Center The m City is interested to Ind out how the co unity feels about the Edina Senior Center. EDINA SENIOR CENTER Note: The City is not proposing a change at this tune. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be co... 4 Topic§ 25 Answers I Closed 2014-06 -02 View Discussio Topic: Membersbin Are you a member of the Edna Senior Center, or will you join when you becorne 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? 13 Responses 13 Responses Po l Al t Dorothy Lo&hl about t month ago yes 0 Supports (comment... -. - - -. comment ... --A I Reply to Dorothy Lod7,h7I John W Lundquist about I month ago The Center is developing plans to reach new (younger) seniors and increase use of our beautiful Center. This is great I see the limited parking as the largest problem for achieving this goal I Support jcomment .. . . ..... - - ------ Reply to John W Lundquist 10m Wand about 1 month ago I am 55 now so don't think I would join til retirement..... riot sure if the senior center offers events for "emerging seniors'??? maybe that is something that should be explored. 1 Support John W Lundquist about I month ago I would recommend joining the Center. Donna is developing progranis for younger seniors both in the evening and weekends. The membership cost is very inexpensive and it informs you of opportunities . I Support comment... L— Reply to John W Lundqulst comment.. . Reply to KIrn Wand-I Hopt Melton 26 drys ago I am not a member. I recommend changing the name as there are marry people, myself included, who do not identify as "seniors". I Support ;comment... — - — - ------ - - --------------------- -------------- - ------ Reply to Hope Melton 0 Diane Reinhart 24 days ago comment ... Yes, I am a member and use the Senior Center for Yoga etc. This is a very iWortant facWarnenity R)r the growing munber of seniors in our community!! 0 Supports comment... - . ............................. ............... . ... ...... --y" I Reply to Diane Reinhart Margaret Stein 22 days ago Although I am 63, 1 am not a member. I had planned to use the Center, but riot until I retire. If more activates become available during evenings and weekends, I would be happy to join now. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Margaret Steln 0 Marlys Grantu! 20 days ago comment... 0 Supports _......-------- - -- comment... 4 1 Reply to Marlys Grant CI Ian Wlkomki 20 days ago I recently moved into 5250 Grandview Square. I am a member and I am looking forward to participating in the activities offered. The Senior Center and the library were positive reasons to move to this area of Edina. I Support comment... - - -- - .L- I Reply to Jan palkowski t>L hnrbara mason 19 days ago I recently moved to Minnesota (Edina) and joined the Center last week rm not sure which activities I might use, but I think it is an important'faci7dy to support. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to bart ra mason KU Bach ft Bach at May 28, 2014 at 3:26pm CDT ?ve been a member for more years than I can count.. Have actively supported the Edina Senior Center and was on the Board for several terms.. and saw this budding become a reality. So many opportunities for so many types of activities -- both at the Center and great trips or events outside the Center.. 0 Supports comment... - Reply to Kay Bach Kay Bach Bob W IONeen at May 28, 2014 at 8:10pm CDT Although I am old enough to be eligible for membership, I have not joined and doubt that 1 will join. I am much more interested in participating in activities at a comunmity center that is open to all ages. Unfbrhmately, unlike many neighboring suburbs, Edina does not have such a facility or program 0 Supports ----------- ._._._.... - - - -- -- -- comment ... -_ _ _ r. I Reply to Bob McKheen Judy Seierson at May 31, 2014 at 11:59am CDT It seems to me that the Senior Centers geared too much to the older senior. I don't expect that to change, but I would like more options for the younger or boomer generation. I would appreciate a di&.rent name other then Senior Center, I think it is outdated. I wish I bad an alternative, if I think of one I feel Path Flooded Sign at Bredesen Park Edina just hired someone to represent existing residents who are deaang, with redevelopment issues we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassnxnL Portable Tatlt Flooded" Sigl at Bredesen Brice Lanes Recent Activity Isaac x created an Idea Isaac x voted on an Idea Isaac x contented on as Idea deanne miller voted on an Idea Judy Severson answered a Discussion Discussions Conservation Incentives Fred Richards &propose Process Capjtaliprovements Edina Senior Center • Terms and Conditions • Privacy POIicV • Support • powered by Speaklh2 • © 2014 Granicus Sneak lip. Edina! Eq Home Discussions Sign � • Surveys Email email address... Password 1password... or, Sigaftn - - - -- -- Connect Sign In Like 4-0 1 i _ _Tweet} Share LLd D IN-MAI ow e� o H�Q •,�cortjlvlo) ��• ,sue "Ibis Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Edina Senior Center The City is interested to find out how the community feels about the Edna Senior Center. EDINA SENIOR 'CENTER Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be co... 4 Topics 25 Answers Closed 2014 -06-02 View Discussion Topic: The Senior Center's Future What do you think is the fitture of the Senior Center? Will the current `Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? 7 Responses 7 Responses John W Lunr gh ( about 1 month ago I have been a member of the Goff League for 12 years and have enjoyed playing at Fred Richards. It is an ideal course for seniors, youth leaning the game, and others who are not considered serious golfers. It has been a great outlet for the 6 leagues that play tyre. I heard the Braemar aright not be ready to accept new leagues until possibly mid summer 2015. I feel our league needs to decide this summer where we will play next year rather than being caught short with no place to play when the season begins in 2015. Once a league moves elsewhere that league is lost to Edna. The City needs to make up their mind. Do they want these leagues next year and if so, what action are they wring to commit to? I don t think they really thought this problem very seriously, if at all. 0 Supports 1 comment ... c - - -- - - - - -A I Reply to John W Lundquist Kim Wan dabout I month ago The Senior Center is definitely needed in Edna! It would be great if it could be marketed a couple times during the year so that residents are aware of it's existence and opportunities. Isn't there a way to track our residents by age for targeted mailings? I think a booth should be set up during the Edna Art Fair as well as a more active presence during the 4th of July parade. Maybe even "senior" events during the year at neighborhood businesses for Edina Residents who show a senior center membership card. Wonder ifthere could be a fee based transportation offered. MAybe the senior center could come to targeted SENIOR buildings in the edura community .... 7500 York & Vernon Terrace. Here they could put on 3 -4 activites during the year and encourage residents to participate in Senior Center activities. Both these buildings have bussing available to transport residents to your activities. Seniors typically love to get out fri and Saturday nights but may lack someone to do something with It would be nice to have a few activities each year that would be dinner and a play in the area. 1 Support comment.. . Reply to Kim Wand Hope Melton 26 days ago I've worked for several years with members of the Baby Boomer generation. Most are interested in a more positive image of older adults than "senior" implies. 'Retirement" simply doesn't apply to these people. Many subscribe to the mission of the MN Vidal Aging Network, to promote civic engagement, personal growth, and self-determination. Accordingly, I'd Ike to see discussion groups around the expansion of housing options, finding a renewed purpose in life, addressing climate change, at the options for civic engagement. rd Ike to see closer ties with the Vital Aging Network. 1 Support comment... Reply to Hope Melton Diane Relnhart24 days ago comment ... I think the Senior Center is serving an excellent purpose and can increase the offerings. I do think there needs to be more communication about the activities currently available because many Edna Seniors are not familiar with the program There is a problem with parking and I don't quite know how that is solved. This is a very important amenity for seniors in Edina. I Support (comment... Margaret Stein 22 days ago -- Reply to Diane Reinhart I particularly Ike what Hope said. The Boomers are retiring and there will be lots of skilled falls ready to get involved, if they only knew where to do it. In addition to bolstering the quality and breadth of services, its possible that, as volunteers, they can perhaps take up some slack and keep some programs alive when budgets get too tight (This is not to say we should replace paid employees with volunteers.) I would also Ike to see a group or place on the website for discussion of retirement options, experiences folks have had as they settled into retirement. T don't know that T have a problem with the name "Senior Centel' but I will admit I have a problem identifying myselfas a "senior"! 0 Supports comment... I Reply to Margaret Stein bnrbara mason 19 days ago I am very glad that The Senior Center allows OIL( to use space for its interesting classes. A great pooling of resources! OLI I is one of the reasons I moved to The Minneapolis area 0 Supports comment... 41 1 Reply to barbara mason ICI Bob Mcfflwen at May 28, 2014 at 8:14pm ®T If the senior center hopes to attract cdizrm hike toe, it will change significantly. If the center could merge its programs into an all-ages community center, I would be there in a minute. When I look at what has kept my 99 year old mother healthy, it is her engagement with people of all ages. I hope to emulate her senior years and not just hang out with other seniors. 0 Supports comment... Sign Up C nnec - -- - -- — —4 1 Reply to Bob McKmen Portable 1TA Flooded" Simi at Bredesen Bike Unes Recent Activity Isaac x created an Idea Isaac x voted on'an Idea Isaac connneiited onadIdea Speak Up. Edina! 1q . Home- Discussio ns Sign 1dM • Sunevs Email ;email address... Password (password... or, Sigri m1b — -- Connect Sign In Like 0 Tweet] Share S r +1 i 0 ow e � Cn • �4'COrri�altn'�'�• ,sue This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Edina Senior Center The City is interested to find out how the community feels about the Edina Senior Center. EDINA SENIOR CENTER Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be co... 4 Topics 25 Answers Closed 2014 -06.02 View Discussion Topic: Recreational Opportunities What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently) What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? 4 Responses 4 Responses W n about 1 month ego Plays, zoo vises, circus, walker...... anything to get out in the community, How about promoting the senior activity card that gets seniors 55 and older into Edina Schools events free of charge. 0 Supports conment... __.....- - - - -- --.... ................. -- ------ - --- - i. Reply to Kim Wand I F�kl Hope Melton 26 days ago Kim is right The fact that recreational opportunities is the only other major topic regarding the Senior Center is symptomatic of the problem I can find all sorts of recreation opportunities in the community. I love working with the school district, for example. What I want is to realty make a difference in this troubled world. 0 Supports comment... . --- —. - .._...- .......... _. -_ __.._..._.__..... ... .... - . -._.- - -- -... -- Reply to Hope Melton 147t Margaret Stein 22 days ago I would lake to see a beginning yoga offering, open to people who can't get on the floor, which would help improve balance and 8exibtbty. I would Ike to see it offered on the weekend or about 7pm during the week. 0 Supports comment... ' _ _ _ ._- _-__ - -- . --------- ------- _ - - - -- _ - _ . -- -_ / Reply io Margaret Stein Bob MCM een at May 28, 2014 at 8:18pm CDT As Hope said, the senior center is the appropriate vehicle for engaging seniors in their broader corurrnnity. Our senior citizens have many skis to ofr, and it is sometimes difficult to find outlets for those skills. In this connnuinRy, I have no trouble finding recreational opportunities; it is the opportunity for service that can sometimes be difficult to find. 0 Supports comment Reply to Bob McK een Sign Up Speak Up. Edna! QHone • Discussions Sign hPM Idea, • Surveys Email �emall address... j Password !password... or, iWOMM -- - nnect Sign In Like G (Tweet Share J o L- f� o-4,(l� Speak Up, Edina! CO We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an y even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you This Discussion channel is currently closed. . see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! ► SHARE your feedbackl ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Edina Senior Center The City is interested to find out how the community feels about the Edina Senior Center. EDINA SENIOR CENTER Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be co... 4 Topics 25 Answers Closed 2014 -06-02 View Discussion Topic: Tir ing of Offerings If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best t¢ne for recreational opportunities to be offered? 1 Responses 1 Responses Kim Wan about 1 month ago I am still working and plan to retire in 5 -8 years. Best time for "emerging senior" activites would be saturdays any time or Sunday aftemoons. those 65 and older, Pd offer a variety of time, even into the evenings. Evening after dinner can be a very bnely time for seniors. I Support comment... -- — =— - - -- .— Reply to Kim Wand Sign Up Connec email address... _ Sign Up Participants Ideas In Action j:5 ue ski "cn� n ai i�� e f�irn s o e�� r� d o� di r-� �� . f lam, Hof �l , yin i a� o �d e A, 5,elo ,oar C'_ j( )o "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name /'Y) aA&4 I�R • %re% r4 Address /V3 -5-P Bre)oksi•dte (Zt lo6 Questions: �C r� Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or -eligibI or embership? Why or why not? did not o.>L./ Ev.r S Je�a� �±Y�, be&� ,cLsX. a v,�'a -r. �- v � �- // �, � � 1 `i ✓ i -71 >°s �h.af cc.rr�w � f��t''e� What do-you think Is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant In five, 10 or even 15 years? e5; U 5 e / cL Jf lU. 6ewi i U-✓ (C cfl l// �/ PS' 1iY�i'>`✓ % n C rNP��.f�.� C±m-) m u �? ; , Ce�if�� , f ASP yn �'h a 7' 6 � i dY Ir I o � were, j rl . � %t c/ I�i/hl��ti /% 5'f C/ f' . 0 p L . 7h e Place, W a S noisy L�an/usir�, and has is J Wal ks p What type of recreation activities should be offered that aren't currentlyWhat sort of recreational opportunities do %sici. boomers want ?, � _ ��/ u hl C6,14>z9.1 1, e ne e cL s lit to /e is '�i' cc OtL tke— Por"laiccN� E�r/y r� i�cc�s wm��1� �t�td,- e: cl`/Vii ,f, bce.f- a s K,(e ' c f o /d �i . ITV e- n_eA_zk_ A=a\ 1,e ss Ire-,q C-i u u -r -Iht tl • 5- b`e - Lcs`r- ��� yes wi // n o / ���av� t booms. .a� wh.L,ti- i 4f-you are,affirently working, at-what- age-do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be- effered?-- .Se_-r, `� f i -c� ova v, f -Lt7 et CL-f / ►t, ��1.4- . (i�a is l �t i �'�"4' r- S �� F�147 C . mrl C e-rr 5 C2 Je_,rl /l� C/d SSEs cs i c3 c �i U-) --5 Problem plotr'ce, h iS k-41 Icick- OY�' PaY /c�,, �j pd c_e_S 6 d-yYw 1 -r"5 CITY OF EDI I V 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 -.Fax 952 -826 -0390 w "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion i Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? ll--,j aw a %' f m/w, �� o°l ©� ✓� What do Y ou think is the future of the Senio Will the current 'Se C ter model' relevant in five, I or even 15 years ?� OU4 ;; 1 Mail &,vW,9a' a,(z �c�y , Patow 0n P �,,&� r - What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? � �c� � Jj le?Ac vtc j q ypentA- urrA vt n.e v�-04 ye-a� e;,7 b you are cu ntly working what agej do you retire? What is the best � for�eational opportunities to be offered? 40 1�. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaNM.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952- 826 -0390 a; o e k "Speak Up, Edina!" May 201.4 Discussion Name Address Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? yA-eyn What do,you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even I5 years? -r d0Y1 -f A�AIOW Y /4/v o IQP- y �fp �� w/ What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities` do boomers want? I Y ICc h1V4, tiery yu �� v.r �� �V�c YO Y A -g a / f4 !4 rvd 6,V0.1 l.1 t3'e— c M q If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational.opportunities to be offered? -b12 E ID CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov. 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0390 _ v o�,0a 1 31 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name / %%"% //)/I / T 15rAl AddressJ,iS� C)I�GGi'r�G/CGl/ ,���� �LfZ(:�y /U�liUl� / %�/ ✓��� 3� Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you Join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? W;M What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? JL ",� t /f c`.?G1I5 H 17� What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? What" G� nGJI �1'li✓YI �Gt�! 7i CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 -826 -0390 - K -1 �.)PA I 7 . �iJ'i lOR✓ P&,IC9- - maq i - 3 I "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Q 11V ! Name— Address Fo � Questions: Are you membe of a dins Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or v h... V ' cam" � Lam What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? `� C tea✓ ��' _� �IV`jl� Oil -� What es of retreat all activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities 'do boome ant? 'J If you are currently.worldng, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? v CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 201;4 Discussion Name C, A3,&77 Address Questions: Are yo.0 a- member of. the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or. why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? i What types of recreational activities should, be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? z�, v V� a� i a Rios ro If you are currently working, it,What°age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN:gov . 952- 927 -8861. Fax 952- 826 - 0390 i "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort recreational opportunities do boomers want? ,4r A 0 JA If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to re re? What is the best time for recreational opportunities it be offered. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0390 - V P-K I 'fr) Qri toR." N fL4<- Maq I — 3) "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion f (,2Name Address Questions: Are you a member of the Edina,Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? / v a 1C , `"'—L. What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities.should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . -Fax 9527826 -0390 n , 3,1 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address— P Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center.? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even. 15 years? p What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? x, 0 'P-) .1 JA If you are currently working at what age doyou plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street -Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EiHnaMN.gov. 952-927-886.1 - Fax 952-826-0390 -v-) "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? hh, • ,(.V v !�l R. l i 1 IV What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently ?. What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? ff _ If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Ediria, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952-826-0390.. "Speak-Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion 4 ;' Name"' , A � . —W-;'` Address L4 Of s,4f; Rw o o l� Ay 's,- Questions: C Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why`or'why'noV .•._.. What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senlor Center moder be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax.952- 826 -0390 Name Questions: "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion r� Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? / r What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? W boomers want? hat sort of recreational opportunities do If you are current working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? %� CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address' /2!>0 Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 ears? y, . • t�S2..f ��i. f,L/ll.- -..4r3 ,L-�._.1D.• .�•. ... -. .,. Y..1 ..l'.*. �..,, . U What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? Tle P, s If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 — V I � x.17 n 1 r7 . c R.• NVAZ- - 1 'l'iGurj i — "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name l* �,, (�i: ti �::.• Ji.,r Address A Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? /P What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? q ! ZA "a O.' JiJ 4 L If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0390 y. , ED a�, F � .by "Speak Up, :Edina!" May 20 -14 Discussion Name Address z�: ��� ��l ��� f �.= .- .,�,i /,f !!' ,r;`14�: �{'� f ,� t. �� r� . •1 4 Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible.age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center. model' be relevant in five, IO or even I5 years? - .. r r 611 •`` What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do .boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? (j J U%� ,,/ff Jj r /� �j ,�i l�r���.bl+'t.r�+ CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 -826 -0390 J 19A .l�l+ o e� ``SpeakUP Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name ' l . ..� i1, l� ; li Address_ Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should)e offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? JJ, I. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 WWW.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 e �'1 r!l ► 1 �i \1�.1'1Ef1R.� Y �Ati �'^"'1 �. � � ' "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name v 91 Address Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think Is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even IS years? ua What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? q'� (A-YNA f O-r Ck ao t` T-1. A .vj If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? C� au� 41 CITY OF ]EDINA 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952-927-8861 - Fax 952-826-0390 If I R--, 1Ar1TW<— rnam I - 3) "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion f Ir >`r Name Address 171 '' Questions:. Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not \�( /f \� �! r l /.i �i:../ `..F.' !_.Lr•., � � �. i fie. i ` tci ��L y N� ` What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? y 1 What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want � d -P�j�d •,;' 'cam r••.� n . %� � � + 71 J f If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for ecreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 )/ A47 0► I i�.rl ��lit�l� 3 f'.%1 1+✓1� tnat 1 I f 3 A. o en 0 )0 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name 4 Address: Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when -you become 55, the:eligible age for membership? Why or why not? } { ` I1M.S,'� 4 ^ +� A >�'t _JI/ �`5 / %'r' �r.� %�� fl JSj4'i' iI✓'"G.JI,. %. �, ,!. /.' ;. r,. ��t��% f.j" G• q v! !, i �,f y1%Y �y. ��,! %. 1 �f .. .�1• ✓'' vl%,., '! F V 411 ! 1 r� .ir L�1 lr.'/P i "i f / f•!.r {', What do you think Is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? 4 What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities.to be offered? V" CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 927 -8861 : Fax 952- 826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name A\f 4-' B M r^,.. CU I (16r A, Address '% (i I G1.4?l � 1 f i f24i ,.. Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? - ` (ti I !� ti. p _ it _ . d -��. ..I r, �!__ � f ;;, `' r "s t 4. yR ; t 1 t i 9k:.� ; r, 1 Cx What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0390 t�A oe "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address U Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? C' What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? j(- /2 � CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0390 (ors l gar ��i -�'� - - ►�'la� i "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address rp( J( Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? loc.,> What do you'think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five,, 10 or even IS years? Citi, t-4 o t Lt,. What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? c.) t-s C4 If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What Is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? Dq CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 wm%,.EdinaMN.g6v 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0390 A�n 31 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address 9 ` Z Questions: ' Are you a member ofthe Edina Senior. Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? avya ct/ m What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? &4/tf IY141 4 7 db�&A I)" 7/n G What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently.? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? 041U� 1 If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? _ CITY OF EDINA 4801 West50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 1 www..EdinaMN.gov. 952 - 927 -8861. Fax 952 - 826 -0390 5n. "Speak Up; Edina! ". May 2014 Discussion Name Till. WA L� H Address;'l/4 R' NlL rV Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? /.4 /'S ` �1 �6 yt-�C What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be recant in five, 10 or even IS years? rl V� What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently ?� es o What is the best time for recreational opportunities to b re . � tx;t� CITX OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 w%mEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 - 8861;• Fax 952 -826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the.Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? 16-00 aul If you are currently world at w 'fiat age do you plan t retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street .,Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0390 31 i "Speak Up, Edina!" May 20.14 Discussion Name 1_,-,1A-1A4 110 kr--S- Address d r l� J`T y� �• E� .'.t a Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' �bee relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? _ If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? 1611) f��- CITY OF EDINA' 4801 West 50th Street . Edina;'Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov. 952 = 927 - 8861. Fax 952 - 826 -0390 f0_ , :1 I "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name D y 0/y Address 5-0Y 4" t /C' J Questions: re you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why -net? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? � 1 What types of recreational activities should. be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 ".'Speak Up, Edina!" May101.4 Discussion Name Address td ���i / ➢mot. Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? r' What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even I5 years? r What types of recreational activities should. be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to ' be offered? i 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name o� rY• �l1[714t9 � _J L 6C S Y-5135 Address 6 �l I/t ��CrE�K7 -�+t►� _ Ec�t,�G� Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or`why not? � e Q -e Me- I1xbt±C"S What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? o� 2 s . Lev e -4-1, c _"t ► ` `� 5 . -ti o h e- 5 e: s . L. SCn�or 4u�T �E.ri'CU What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? + `�Vbu�d ,1K�c s�`c thv� —z �-, ct5 Sc� C'�►ti tC' 1 G1 ��-lv� �.5• 1 rte' 1 lt►t +�C, sC;Arei' If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? 1 1 ( II Lj v a u� �''� - rct�%rec\ t 1 X- cl � hc:�� heert - ur ��. k w..; ki 1) � , i�ar- rnc.l�h t eve J c v,il vr� S CkCLI CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 ..ii , n. 1, �: , (1Prat \2 1 PPP MC--- InatA i — 3 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name f mE azL AddressC/&L3 L!/ q Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? % �i Gf Ski revcrr��s �r/llll ;��r�r ��cleG�%'�gS 7`��_Sc�ve yoii, �t��r s� g A�v I-e c?c--fil ve / /P.rf�e oGrv' !/i sia�t %�r�gss� What types o recreational activities shourd be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? � jL, td'1 %Gy'J rk o y�eR��� s�ii 7y'��5/� /ra ve�9`- a4P f i-C I -7LY-0-e.Jcl 7'L-1 -1;9F, ;z e7- -,,vl // fe/ /mss lw&-e 7`'�� � fi'w� .r�v,Jo b ism el If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? e ca ev Ale r gO DOI�' c�p v�L9eY <e� hS , CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 927 -8861 . Fax 952- 826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name Address �� , `l� �� �/ �. /�,r -•'r -r.; `' ? Questions: Are you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? Why or why not? i What do you think is the future of the Senior Center? Will the current'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 "Speak Up, Edina!" May 2014 Discussion Name _ px - Questions: ,Are-you a member of the Edina Senior Center, or will you join when you become 55, the eligible age for membership? y r why not? ' R . What do you think is the future of the Senior nter? Will the current 'Senior Center model' be relevant in five, 10 or even 15 years? 4'e + What types of recreational activities should be offered that aren't currently.? What sort of recreational opportunities do boomers want? If you are currently working, at what age do you plan to retire? What is the best time for recreational opportunities to be offered? '^'^ 17 "4 -• ". CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861. Fax 952 - 826 -0390 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DEC. 31,2013 City of Edina, Minnesota e•di•na / 1 -di -na / noun 1. The preeminent place for 11v1110,, learning, raising families & doing business CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 Prepared by: Department of Finance John Wallin — Treasurer and Finance Director Eric Roggeman — Assistant Finance Director Kyle Sawyer - Accountant CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal GFOA Certificate of Achievement Organization Organization Chart Page No. I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION II. FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors' Report Management's Discussion and Analysis Basic Financial Statements: Government -wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position Statement of Activities Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds Reconcili'ation;of.the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Agency Funds Notes to the Financial Statements Required Supplementary Information: Budgetary. Comparison Information: Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Other Post - Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress Notes to Required Supplementary Information 1 4 5 6 7' 11 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 32 34 35 69 74 75 76 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Combining"and,'Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules: Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Special Revenue' Funds Combining..Statement,of Revenues, Expenditures and.Changes in Fund Balances .Nonmajor - ,,Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Fund - Community Development Block Grant Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Y - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Fund - Police Special Revenue Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Fund - Braemar Memorial Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Special Revenue Fund - Pedestrian and Cycle Safety Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Governmental Fund - Debt Service Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances- Budget and Actual Governmental Fund - Construction Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund -Balances - Budget and Actual Combining Statement of Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Cash Flows Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds Supplementary Financial Information: Tax Capacity, Tax Levies and Tax Capacity Rates Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Grandview Area Redevelopment District- #1202 80 81 82 83 84 85 88 89 92 93 94 97 99 100 102 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Financial Trends: Net Position by Component 108 Changes in Net Position 110 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 112 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 114 Revenue Capacity: Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 116 Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 117 Principal Property Tax Payers 118 Property Tax Levies and Collections 119 Debt Capacity: Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 120 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 121 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 122 Legal Debt Margin Information 123 Pledged Revenue Coverage 124 Demographic and Economic Information: Demographic and Economic Statistics 125 Principal Employers 126 Operating Information: Full -Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 127 Operating Indicators by Function 128 Capital Asset Statistics by Function 129 Page No. Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - #1203 103 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 70th Street and Cahill Road District - #1207 104 Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southdale 2 - #1208 105 III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Financial Trends: Net Position by Component 108 Changes in Net Position 110 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 112 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 114 Revenue Capacity: Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 116 Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 117 Principal Property Tax Payers 118 Property Tax Levies and Collections 119 Debt Capacity: Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 120 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 121 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 122 Legal Debt Margin Information 123 Pledged Revenue Coverage 124 Demographic and Economic Information: Demographic and Economic Statistics 125 Principal Employers 126 Operating Information: Full -Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 127 Operating Indicators by Function 128 Capital Asset Statistics by Function 129 This page left blank intentionally. June 9, 2014 To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City): Minnesota statutes require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the information presented in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. P.A., a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has issued an unmodified ( "clean ") opinion on the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013. The independent auditor's report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD &A) immediately follows the independent auditor's report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The MD &A complement this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. Profile of the City The City, incorporated in 1888, is a fully developed first -ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 48,829. Currently, 98% of the City is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways and 11.8% supporting the park and open spaces. The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial and public /semi- public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries. The City has operated under the Council- Manager form of government since 1955. Policy- making and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other members, all elected on a non - partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the City Manager. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing the day -to -day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments. Council members serve four -year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor also serves a four -year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large. The City provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational and cultural activities and events. The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g., public safety), and department (e.g. police). Department heads may use resources within a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments. CIT1Y OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street a Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov o 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 Local economy The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re- development in recent years. The re- development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high -tech base that adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions within the governments boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming years. The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To date, approximately 98% of the available housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has changed over the years from exclusively single family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the City's concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority. The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody's, respectively. Long -term financial planning The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven -county metropolitan area to have a Comprehensive Plan and State ,law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to the Metropolitan Council for review in 2008. A final version was adopted by the City Council in 2009. The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing communication between City representatives and the public. The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities to improve the area's state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways and well - placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from state, county and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers. Relevant financial policies The City has adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long -term financial planning. Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance, capital outlay, and debt management. Assignments for investments and compensated absences are all calculated as specified in the policies. In addition, the City has $12,573,457 unassigned fund balance in the general fund. This amount is $2,049,968 above the goal range identified in the policy. Major initiatives The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five -year Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects. E Awards and Acknowledgements The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Edina for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. This was the seventh consecutive year that the government has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City's finances. Respectfully submitted, John Wallin Finance Director Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director 3 Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Edina Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012 *09)W A Executive Director /CEO CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORGANIZATION December 31, 2013 Mayor: James Hovland Council Members: Mary Brindle Ann Swenson Joni Bennett Josh Sprague City Manager: Scott Neal Finance Director/Treasurer: John Wallin City Clerk: Debra Mangen 5 Term Expires December 31, 2016 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2014 Appointed Appointed Appointed CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Information Streets Design & Project Enterprise Technology Patrol Fire & Rescue Maintenance Management Facilities Building Environmental Investigations Inspections Utility Operations Services Civilian Services Equipment Operations Community F Iartriral JH V arr IMMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. (continued) 7 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com OPINIONS In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2013, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. OTHER MATTERS Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management's Discussion and Analysis, the Budgetary Comparison Information, and the Schedule of Funding Progress for the Other Post - Employment Benefits Plan, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The introductory section, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules, the supplementary financial information, and the statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Emphasis of Matter As described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements, in 2013, the City adopted new accounting guidance, GASB Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. (continued) OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAUDIT/NGSTANDARDS In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 9, 2014 on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. W4&&7,, WVU.;6 , Kam , /2a..44A..u-C.. " e0 ., P. A - Minneapolis, Minnesota June 9, 2014 This page left blank intentionally. 10 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS As management of the City of Edina (the City), we offer readers of the City's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this report. Financial Highlights • The assets of the City exceeded its liabilities at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $220,980,089 (net position). Of this amount, $50,109,776 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal policies. • The City's total net position increased by $11,579,920 from current year operations. $4,884,510 of this increase is due to special assessment revenues, which help support our road reconstruction program. Also, $4,572,422 of the increase is due to Utility revenues over expenses, which are being reinvested in new or rebuilt infrastructure according to the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Utility Rate Study. • As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $45,292,135, a decrease of $2,356,722 in comparison with the prior year. • At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $12,573,457 or 39% of total general fund expenditures. • The City's total bonded debt decreased by $9,091,375 during the current fiscal year, from $99,703,720 to $90,612,345. The City issued new debt during the year consisting of $9,390,000 general obligation bonds to finance various street infrastructure improvement projects, the new golf dome and refunding of $5,735,000 of debt. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City's basic financial statements. The City's basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government -wide financial statements. The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, in a manner similar to a private- sector business. The statement of net position presents information on all of the City's assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. 11 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) The statement of activities presents information showing how the City's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works and parks. The business -type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course, arena, and community activity centers. Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near -term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financial requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long -term impact of the City's near term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains 4 individual major governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund and the construction fund. Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major governmental funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for its general fund, debt service fund, construction fund and all of its special revenue funds and proprietary funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for the general fund, debt service fund, construction fund and all the special revenue funds to demonstrate compliance with these budgets. Proprietary funds. The City maintains five major enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the governmental -wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center, golf course and arena operations. 12 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Data from the other proprietary funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major proprietary funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government -wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City's own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government —wide and fund financial statements. Other information. The combining statements governmental and enterprise funds are presented information on budgetary comparisons. Government -wide Financial Analysis referred to earlier in connection with non -major immediately following the required supplementary As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. In the case of the City, assets exceeded liabilities by $220,980,089 at the close of the most recent fiscal year. The largest portion of the City's net position ($149,969,357 or 68 %) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. 13 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) City of Edina's Net Position At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of net position reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year. There was also an increase of $7,212,962 in unrestricted net position, largely due to positive operating results in the Utility fund and a large new assessment for the Richmond Hills neighborhood reconstruction project. 14 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2013 2012 - Restated 2013 2012 - Restated 2013 2012 - Restated Current and other assets $ 66,664,337 $ 67,078,680 $ 21,429,233 $ 25,951,920 $ 88,093,570 $ 93,030,600 Capital assets 137,809,952 135,922,566 102,514,577 97,044,842 240,324,529 232,967,408 Total assets $204,474,289 $ 203,001,246 $123,943,810 $ 122,996,762 $328,418,099 $ 325,998,008 Long -term liabilities outstanding $ 56,200,689 $ 57,536,627 $ 32,914,580 $ 35,799,997 $ 89,115,269 $ 93,336,624 Other liabilities 10,898,734 14,868,386 7,424,007 8,392,829 18,322,741 23,261,215 Total liabilities $ 67,099,423 $ 72,405,013 $ 40,338,587 $ 44,192,826 $107,438,010 $ 116,597,839 Net position: Net investment in capital assets $ 83,842,970 $ 78,644,392 $ 66,126,387 $ 63,766,144 $149,969,357 $ 142,410,536 Restricted 20,289,579 23,215,910 611,377 876,909 20,900,956 24,092,819 Unrestricted 33,242,317 28,735,931 16,867,459 14,160,883 50,109,776 42,896,814 Total net position $137,374,866 $ 130,596,233 $ 83,605,223 $ 78,803,936 $220,980,089 $ 209,400,169 An additional portion of the City's net position ($20,900,956) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position ($50,109,776) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of net position reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business -type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year. There was also an increase of $7,212,962 in unrestricted net position, largely due to positive operating results in the Utility fund and a large new assessment for the Richmond Hills neighborhood reconstruction project. 14 15 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) As shown below, the City's net position increased by $11,579,920 during the current fiscal year. Factors contributing to this change are.discussed in the next two sections. City of Edina's Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Totals 2013 2012 - Restated 2013 2012 - Restated 2013 2012 - Restated Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services. $ 9,517,662 $ 8,606,777 $ 39,751,184 $ 39,039,592 $ 49,268,846. $ 47,646,369 Operating grants and contributions- 2,283,007 1,685,026 516,242 1,042,195 2,799,249 21727,221 Capital grants and ._•- contributions 6,372,735 9,137,011 6,372,735 9;137,011 General revenues: Property taxes 26,894,161 25,884,662 26,894,161 25,884,662 Othertaxes 5,873,905 4,352,465 5,873,905 4,352,465 ;. Gain on disposal of assets 16,654 - 17,587 2,644,854 34,241 2,644;854 Insurance recovery 816,654 - - 816,654 Unrestricted investment _,. earnings (96,390) 341,986 (77,848) 113,177 (174,238) 455,163 Total revenues 51,678,388 50,007,927 40,207,165 42,839,818 91,885,553 92,847,745 Expenses: General govemment 8,256,261 12,598,979 8,256,261 12,598,979 Public safety 17,117,693 16,598,423 17,117,693 16,598,423 Public works 11;502,250 9,437,285 11,502,250 9,437,285 Parks 6,132,709 5,904,724 6,132,709 5,904,724 Interest on long -tens debt 2,024,749 2,144,811 2,024,749 2,144,811 Utilities -.. ._ 13,748,186 12,635,286 13,748,186 12,635,286 Liquor 12, 261,413 11, 740, 744 12, 261,413 11,740, 744 Aquatic center 822,932 865,157 822,932 865,157 Golf course 3,199,815 3,289,416 3,199,815 3,289,416 Arena 2,272,510 2,220,965 2,272,510 2,220,965 Community activity centers 2,967,115 2,842,139 2,967,115 2,842,139 - • Total expenses 45,033,662 46,684,222 35,271,971 33,593,707 80,305,633. 80,277,929 - Increase in net position before transfers 6,644,726 3,323,705 4,935,194 9,246,111 11,579,920 12,569,816 Transfers 133,907 696,935 (133,907) (696,935) - " Increase in net position 6,778,633 4,020,640 4,801,287 8,549,176 11,579,920 12,569,816 Net position - January 1 130,596,233 126,575,593 78,803,936 70,254,760 209,400,169 196,830,353 Net position - December 31 $137,374,866 $ 130,596,233 $ 83,605,223 $ 78,803,936 $220,980,089 $ 209,400,169 15 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Governmental Activities Governmental activities increased the City's net position by $6,778,633, accounting for 59% of the total growth in net position. Key elements of this increase are as follows: • Property tax revenues increased by $1,009,499 (3.9 %) during the year, which is more than the property tax levy increase of 1.9% outlined in our 2013 budget due to improved collection rate. • The City also collected $3,981,938 in tax increments, which were used to pay principal and interest on tax increment debt. This increases net position because debt principal payments are not expensed on the Statement of Activities. • The debt service fund paid a total of $14,531,375 in principal payments during 2013, including the tax increment debt. • General government expenses decreased by $4,342,718 in 2013 compared to 2012. The majority of this decrease is due to less being spent on the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District in 2013. Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and expenses: Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities Other Charges for services 2% 18% Other taxes 11% Property taxes – — 52% Operating grants and contributions 5% Capital grants and contributions 12% Expenses and Program Revenues -Governmental Activities Millions 18 16 14 - -- - _ oexpenses 12 o program revenue 10 8 6 4 _ -- - 2 General Public safety Public works Parks Interest on government long -term debt 16 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Business -type Activities Business -type activities increased net position by $4,801,287 accounting for 41 % of the City's growth in net position. Key elements of the current year increase are as follows: • The utility fund had income before transfers of $4,572,422 for 2013. This additional revenue is used to invest in new and rebuilt utility infrastructure according to the City's CIP and utility rate study. • Business -type activities made net transfers of $133,907 to governmental activities during 2013 to provide cash flow for operational and capital improvement needs. Revenues by Source - Business -type Activities Operating grants and contributions 1% Charges for services 99% Expenses and Program Revenues - Business -type Activities Millions 20 18 a expenses 16 ❑ program revenue 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Utilities Liquor Aquatic Golf course Arena Community center activity centers 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Financial Analvsis of the Citv's Funds As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance - related legal requirements. Governmental Funds. The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near - term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $45,292,135, a decrease of $2,356,722 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately 28% of this total amount ($12,573,457) constitutes unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund balance is 1) nonspendable due to prepaid items ($13,322), 2) restricted by external creditors, grantors, laws or regulations ($22,791,627), or 3) assigned by internal constraints ($9,913,729). The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance of the general fund was $12,573,457. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, unassigned fund balance represents 39% of total general fund expenditures. The fund balance of the City's general fund decreased by $507,499 during the current fiscal year. Key factors in this decrease are as follows: • Total general fund revenues were $2,282,106 over budget, including higher than expected building permit activity. General fund license and permit revenues increased by 31.8% in the current fiscal year after a 16.3% and 13% increase in 2012 and 2011, respectively. • Total general fund expenditures were $396,733 over budget. Much of this overage occurred in the fire protection and communication departments. The fire protection overage was a result of a change made to the way we account for fire aid as requested by the State auditor. The communications department difference was due to the hiring of a new employee to handle the Southwest Suburban Cable commission that was not budgeted for. • The liquor fund transferred $765,100 of profits to the general fund, as planned in the 2013 budget. • Transfers out of the general fund totaled $2,392,872 for a variety of purposes planned as part of the 2013 budget process. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance decreased by $700,505 in the current fiscal year because there was a large amount spent on the Centennial Tax Increment Financing District from tax increment funds during the year. The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $6,246,769, all of which is restricted for the payment of debt service. The net decrease in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was $3,457,639. Fund balance decreased during the year as a result of refunding 2007C and 2009B bonds for $3,710,000 and $5,735,000 respectively. The construction fund balance increased by $937,208 in 2013 due to $2,148,514 in transfers to finance various capital projects and equipment purchases. Also, new debt was issued in 2013 to help finance various street improvement projects. 18 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Proprietary funds. The City's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Unrestricted net position of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $14,021,972. The total growth in net position from current year operations was $4,472,422. Operating revenues and expenses in the utilities fund increased by .6% and 9.2 %, respectively, in 2013. Revenues increased due to rate increases that are intended to help replace aging infrastructure and expenses increased as a result of higher contractual service and depreciation expenses related to infrastructure projects. The City invested $6,670,868 in utility fund capital assets during 2013. Unrestricted net position of the liquor fund at the end of the year amounted to $1,704,172. Total net position increased by $127,911. The liquor fund continues to transfer profits back into other City funds, including the general, construction, golf course, arena and art center funds. The liquor fund made transfers totaling $1,340,100 to other funds during 2013. The majority of this amount ($765,100) was transferred to the general fund according to the budget. Unrestricted net position of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $213,760. Aquatic center revenues decreased by 7.4% from 2012 due to less favorable weather for the aquatic center in 2013. The aquatic center remains profitable. Unrestricted net position of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($1,362,075), a decrease of $1,571,300 from the prior year. Prior to 2012, unrestricted net position had been declining or essentially flat for a number of years in the golf course fund because cash flow is not sufficient to make principal and interest payments on outstanding debt and declining rounds played at the City's courses. The large increase in 2012 was the result of insurance proceeds received for the collapse of the golf dome which was spent in 2013 to rebuild the structure. Unrestricted net position of the arena fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($221,555), an increase of $2,528,104 from the prior year. The large increase in 2013 is the result of the completed remodel in 2013 which increased revenues by 33.8 %, mostly in building rental and concession sales. General Fund Budaetary Hiahliahts During the year there was a $2,753,090 increase in appropriations between the original and final amended budget. The majority of the increase was a transfer to the construction, arena, and golf course funds of unassigned general fund balance according to the City's fund balance policy. During the year, revenues were $2,282,106 more than budget, as the improving economy affected our permits and charges for services revenues, which exceeded budget by $1,542,584. During the year, expenses were $396,733 more than budget due to a newly created residential reconstruction position that was not budgeted for, and is funded by the additional permit revenue received. In addition, a change was made to the way the City accounts for fire aid as requested by the State Auditor. Many City departments were under budget for the year, particularly the public health department, which was under staffed during the year because a position that came open was not immediately filled. The parks maintenance department was under budget due partially to lower than expected paths and hard surfaces repair spending. The City also saved money by continuing to replace fluorescent light bulbs with light- emitting diode (LED) bulbs. 19 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Capital Asset and Debt Administration Capital assets. The City's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities as of December 31, 2013, amounted to $240,324,529 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets included land, land improvements, intangible assets such as easements, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), buildings, vehicles and equipment. The total increase in the City's investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was 3.2 percent (a 1.4 percent increase for governmental activities and a 5.6 percent increase for business -type activities). Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following: • The City completed construction on the arena remodel in 2013; total construction cost was $4,040,495. • The City completed construction on new water treatment plant #6; total construction cost was $6,815,347. • A variety of street construction, sidewalk and traffic signal projects began in 2013. • A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including watermain, sanitary and storm sewer, construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $10,794,258. • Construction of the new golf dome continued in 2013, construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year has reached $3,544,183. City of Edina's Capital Assets (Net of Depreciation) Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4. Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long -term debt outstanding of $90,612,345, a decrease of $9,091,375 from 2012. This decrease resulted from the refunding of 2007C and 2009B bonds and the payment of previously scheduled principal payments offset by $9,390,000 in new debt issued. $31,390,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and special assessments. This amount increased from 2012 due to a new debt issue that refunded the 2009B bond. $18,360,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City's special assessment program. This amount decreased from 2012 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues and refunding of the 2007C bonds offset by new debt issued in the amount of $2,555,000. 20 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 Land and land improvements $ 26,204,303 $ 24,052,302 $ 4,984,372 $ 5,258,708 $ 31,188,675 $ 29,311,010 Easements 111,000 111,000 - - 111,000 111,000 Buildings and structures 47,247,194 48,966,028 11,009,519 7,365,467 58,256,713 56,331,495 Machinery and equipment 6,487,848 7,104,264 2,657,310 2,786,411 9,145,158 9,890,675 Infrastructure 43,539,660 42,197,555 69,364,146 61,707,121 112,903,806 103,904,676 Parks 7,472,349 7,820,810 - - 7,472,349 7,820,810 Construction in progress 6,747,598 5,670,607 14,499,230 19,927,135 21,246,828 25,597,742 Total $137,809,952 $135,922,566 $102,514,577 $ 97,044,842 $ 240,324,529 $ 232,967,408 Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 4. Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long -term debt outstanding of $90,612,345, a decrease of $9,091,375 from 2012. This decrease resulted from the refunding of 2007C and 2009B bonds and the payment of previously scheduled principal payments offset by $9,390,000 in new debt issued. $31,390,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and special assessments. This amount increased from 2012 due to a new debt issue that refunded the 2009B bond. $18,360,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City's special assessment program. This amount decreased from 2012 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues and refunding of the 2007C bonds offset by new debt issued in the amount of $2,555,000. 20 Management's Discussion, and Analysis (Continued) Also outstanding. is $5;640,000 public project revenue bonds which financed two gymnasiums and the new public works ,facility. This amount decreased in 2013 due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues and the refunding of the 2009B bond. There is a total of $35,160,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. This amount decreased $2,825,000 during the year due to regularly scheduled principal payments on outstanding issues, offset by issuance of a new bond to finance the cost of the new golf dome. City of Edina's Outstanding Debt Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Totals 2013 2012 .2013 2012 2013 2012 Tax increment bonds $ - $ 550,000 $ $ $ $ 550,000 General obligation bonds 31,390,000 27,6801000 31,390,000 27,680,000 Public improvement bonds 18,360,000 21,550,000 18,360,000 21,550,000 Public project revenue bonds 5,640,000 11,865,000 5,640,000 11,865,000 Edina emerald energy program bonds 62,345 73,720 62,345 73,720 Revenue bonds - 35,160,000 37,985,000 35,160,000 37,985,000 Total $ ..55,452,345 $ 61,718,720 $ 35,160;000 $ 37,985,000 $ 90,612,345 $ 99,703,720 The Cityy maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor's. State statutes'limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue up to 3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $263,958,018. Only $37,030;000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation. r Additional information on the City's long -term debt can be found in Note 5. Economic Factors and Next Year's Budoet The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for December 2013 was 3.98 %, well below the state'and national levels.. The City is home to Southdale Center, the nation's first fully enclosed climate - controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale hospital, as well as' several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the best in the. country. Ninety -eight percent of students graduate, with ninety -four percent pursuing some sort of post- secondary education. 21 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Continued) Property values. in Edina increased at a rapid- -.pace for several years through 2006, but values declined from 2007 -2012 and are back on the rise in- 2013. Estimated market value of real estate increased 1.2% for taxes payable in 2013. 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% Market Value, and Tax Capacity Annual Changes Tax Capacity —A— Market Value 2004 2005 2006 = 2007 2008 2009 . 2010 2011 2012 2013, The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class .rates are set by,state statute. Tax - capacity for real estate increased 1.4% for taxes payable in 2013, but had been negative from 2009 through 2012. All of these factors above were considered in preparing the City's budget for the 2014 fiscal year. The City's adopted 2014 budget includes a property tax levy of $27,454,872 for all funds, an increase of 2.65% from the 2013 levy. Requests for Information This financial report is designed to provide a .general overview of the City's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report,or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of.the Finance Director, 4801 West 50'h Street; Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report can also be found on the internet at www.cityofEidina.com. 22 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION December 31, 2013 Assets: Current assets: Cash and investments Restricted cash and investments Accrued interest Accounts receivable, net Special assessments receivable Due from other governments Prepaid items Inventory Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Investment in joint powers agreement Nondepreciable capital assets Depreciable capital assets (net) Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Accrued interest payable Contracts payable Due to other governments Deposits payable Unearned revenue Compensated absences payable Bonds payable Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Net OPEB obligation Compensated absences payable Bonds payable, net Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Net position: Net investment in capital assets Restricted for tax increments Restricted for debt service Restricted for pedestrian and cyclist improvements Restricted for energy efficiency projects Restricted for parkland dedication Restricted for police special revenue Restricted for braemar golf donations Unrestricted Total net position Primary Govemment Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total 44,531,347 2,646,731 92,355 1,724,842 15,278,361 792,914 13,322 65,079,872 1,584,465 25,495,719 112,314,233 139,394,417 204,474,289 2,222,039 1,246,384 747,302 315,745 30,888 533,084 158,831 1,559,461 4,085,000 10,898,734 1,333,029 2,339,192 52,528,468 56,200,689 67,099,423 83,842,970 11,495,886 6,246,769 492,362 816,654 185,395 717,343 335,170 33,242,317 $ 137,374,866 $ 13,742,272 760,206 38,502 4,916,184 308,900 4,498 365,523 1,293,148 21,429,233 15,588,195 86,926, 382 102,514,577 123,943,810 943,123 323,726 456,624 973,501 188,346 112,216 103,312 363,159 3,960,000 7,424,007 154,946 544,739 32,214,895 32,914,580 40,338,587 66,126,387 611,377 16,867,459 $ 83,605,223 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 23 $ 58,273,619 3,406,937 130,857 6,641,026 15,587,261 797,412 378,845 1,293,148 86,509,105 1,584,465 41,083,914 199,240,615 241,908,994 328,418,099 3,165,162 1,570,110 1,203,926 1,289,246 219,234 645,300 262,143 1,922,620 8,045,000 18,322,741 1,487,975 2,883,931 84,743,363 89,115,269 107,438,010 149,969,357 11,495,886 6,858,146 492,362 816,654 185,395 717,343 335,170 50,109,776 $ 220,980,089 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Functions /Programs Primary government: Governmental activities: General government Public safety Public works Parks Interest on long-term debt Total government activities Business -type activities: Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf course Arena Community activity centers Total business -type activities Total primary government Expenses Program Revenues Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Services Contributions Contributions $ 8,256,261 $ 1,259,908 17,117,693 7,410,755 11,502,250 347,891 6,132, 709 499,108 2,024,749 - 45,033,662 9,517,662 13,748,186 17,831,225 12,261,413 13,711,557 822,932 928,055 3,199,815 2,711,743 2,272,510 1,942,971 2,967,115 2,625,633 35,271,971 39,751,184 $ 80,305,633 $ 49,268,846 $ 630,855 $ - 1,149,468 74,520 213,868 6,297,429 170,036 786 118,780 - 2,283,007 6,372,735 489,387 765 17,984 8,106 516,242 $ 2,799,249 $ 6,372,735 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 24 $ (6,365,498) $ - $ (6,365,498) (8,482,950) - (8,482,950) (4,643,062) - (4,643,062) (5,462,779) -- (5,462,779) (1,905,969) - (1,905,969) (26,860,258) - (26,860,258) General revenues: Property taxes Tax increment collections Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on disposal of capital assets Insurance recovery Transfers Total general revenues and transfers Change in net position Net position - beginning as previously reported Change in accounting principle Net position - beginning as restated Net position - ending (26,860,258) 4,572,426 4,572,426 1,450,144 1,450,144 105,888 105,888 (488,072) (488,072) (311,555) (311,555) (333',376) (333,376) 4,995,455 4;995,455 4,995,455 (21,864,803) 26,894,161 - 26,894,161 3,981,938 - 3,981,938 1,891,967 - 1,891,967 (96,390) (77,848) (174,238) 16,654 17,587 34,241 816,654 - 816,654 133,907 (133,907) - 33,638,891 (194,168) 33,444,723 6,778,633 4,801,287 11,579,920 131,448,002 79,033,662 210,481,664 (851,769) (229,726) (1,081,495) 130,596,233 78,803,936 209,400,169 $ 137,374,866 $ 83,605,223 $ 220,980,089 25 This page left blank intentionally. 26 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS December 31, 2013 Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue - taxes - - 1,878 527 - 2,405 Unavailable revenue - special assessments - - 14,622,874 655,487 - 15,278,361 Total deferred inflows of resources - - 14,624,752 656,014 - 15,280,766 Fund balance: Nonspendable 13,322 Housing & - 13,322 Restricted Nonmajor Total 2,361,529 22,791,627 Assigned Redevelopment Debt - 9,913,729 Governmental Governmental - - - General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds Assets inflows of resources, Cash and Investments $ 15,923,685 $ 12,478,484 $ 6,051,579 $ 8,841,672 $ 1,235,927 $ 44,531,347 Restricted cash and investments - - 144,438 2,502,293 - 2,646,731 Accrued interest 31,109 33,396 6,690 19,393 1,767 92,355 Accounts receivable 560,469 - - 62,510 1,101,863 1,724,842 Special assessments receivable - - 14,622,874 655,487 - 15,278,361 Due from other governments 522,314 9,823 45,940 57,836 157,001 792,914 Prepaid items 13,322 - - - - 13,322 Total assets =1 ,050,899 $ 12,521,703 $ 20,871,521 $ 12,139,191 $ 2,496,558 $ 65,079,872 Liabilities Accounts payable $ 1,075,132 $ 719,110 $ - $ 310,177 $ 117,620 $ 2,222,039 Salaries payable 1,235,997 5,209 - 5,178 - 1,246,384 Contracts payable - - - 298,336 17,409 315,745 Due to other governments 21,645 9,243 - - - 30,888 Deposits payable 227,659 292,500 - 12,925 - 533,084 Unearned revenue 158,831 - - - - 158,831 Total liabilities 2,719,264 1,026,062 - 626,616 135,029 4,506,971 Deferred inflows of resources Unavailable revenue - taxes - - 1,878 527 - 2,405 Unavailable revenue - special assessments - - 14,622,874 655,487 - 15,278,361 Total deferred inflows of resources - - 14,624,752 656,014 - 15,280,766 Fund balance: Nonspendable 13,322 - - - - 13,322 Restricted 185,395 11,495,641 6,246,769 2,502,293 2,361,529 22,791,627 Assigned 1,559,461 - - 8,354,268 - 9,913,729 Unassigned 12,573,457 - - - - 12,573,457 Total fund balance 14,331,635 11,495,641 6,246,769 10,856,561 2,361,529 45,292,135 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances $ 17,050,899 $ 12,521,703 $ 20,871,521 $ 12,139,191 $ 2,496,558 $ 65,079,872 Fund balance reported above $ 45,292,135 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the funds. 137,809,952 Investment in joint powers agreement are not available to pay for current - period expenditures, and therefore, are not reported in the funds. 1,584,465 Other long -term assets are not available to pay for current - period expenditures and, therefore, are deferred in the funds. 15,280,766 Long -term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds. (62,592,452) Net position of governmental activities (page 23) $ 137,374,866 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 27 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Revenues: General property taxes Tax increment collections Franchise taxes Special assessments License and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment income Rental of property Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Public works Parks Capital outlay: General government Public safety Public works Parks Debt service: Bond principal Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Sale of capital assets Insurance recovery Bonds issued Refunding bonds issued Premium (discounts) on bondsissued Total other financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Housing & Nonmajor Total Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds $ 22,006,527 $ - $ 3,892,598 $ 992,631 $ - $ 26,891,756 - 3,981,938 - - - 3,981,938 794,261 - - 79,398 1,018,308 1,891,967 - - 2,837,227 2,047,283 - 4,884,510 4,122,305 - - 28,207 - 4,150,512 1,234,425 - 118,780 884,790 271,171 2,509,166 3,564,341 - - 103,271 - 3,667,612 1,017,219 - - - 92,491 1,109,710 53,583 (116,524) (19,712) (18,179) 4,442 (96,390) 518,862 - - - - 518,862 5,539 - - 272,282 786 278,607 33,317,062 3,865,414 6,828,893 4,389,683 1,387,198 49,788,250 5,883,436 1,189,871 - 84,909 193,340 7,351,556 15,749,935 - - 12,912 96,775 15,859,622 6,690,986 - - 247,624 80,004 7,018,614 3,872,432 - - 43,136 - 3,915,568 - 2,709,357 - 620,354 - 3,329,711 - - - 465,548 - 465,548 - - - 4,467,625 462,020 4,929,645 - 1,699 - 1,963,604 - 1,965,303 - 14,531,375 - - 14,531,375 - - 2,270,259 - - 2,270,259 32,196,789 3,900,927 16,801,634 7,905,712 832,139 61,637,201 1,120,273 (35,513) (9,972,741) (3,516,029) 555,059 (11,848,951) 765,100 - 559,350 2,148,514 - 3,472,964 (2,392,872) (664,992) - (281,193) - (3,339,057) - - - 61,642 - 61,642 - - - - 816,654 816,654 - - 99,433 2,455,567 - 2,555,000 - - 5,710,000 - - 5,710,000 - - 146,319 68,707 - 215,026 (1,627,772) (664,992) 6,515,102 4,453,237 816,654 9,492,229 (507,499) (700,505) (3,457,639) 937,208 1,371,713 (2,356,722) Fund balance - January 1 14,839,134 12,196,146 9,704,408 9,919,353 989,816 47,648,857 Fund balance - December 31 $ 14,331,635 $ 11,495,641 $ 6,246,769 $ 10,856,561 $ 2,361,529 $ 45,292,135 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 28 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities (page 24 -25) are different because: Net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds (page 28) Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. In the statement of activities, only the gain on the sale of capital assets is reported. However, in the governmental funds, the proceeds from the sale increases financial resources. Thus, the change in net position differs from the change in fund balance by the net book value of the capital assets sold. Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds. The issuance of long -term debt (e.g., bonds, leases) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on position. Also, governmental funds report the effect of premiums, discounts and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. This amount is the net effect of these differences in the treatment of long -term debt and related items. Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources (OPEB obligations, accrued interest and amortization on debt and compensated absences payable) and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Change in net position of governmental activities (page 25) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 29 $ (2,356,722) 1,932, 374 (44,988) 1,056,830 6,051,349 139,790 $ 6,778,633 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2013 Liabilities: Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Current liabilities: Nonmajor Accounts payable 345,029 Aquatic Golf 33,806 Enterprise 73,323 943,123 Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Total Assets: Accrued interest payable 393,224 - 4,554 - 58,846 - Current assets: Contracts payable 256,094 - - 595,442 69 121,896 Cash and investments $ 9,895,458 $ 995,734 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,851,080 $13,742,272 Restricted cash and investments - - - 760,206 - - 760,206 Interest receivable 21,963 4,874 2,302 1,373 - 7,990 38,502 Accounts receivable, net 4,106,356 - - 619,464 182,536 7,828 4,916,184 Special assessments receivable 308,900 - - - - - 308,900 Due from other funds 442,991 491,452 - - - - 934,443 Due from other governments 4,498 - - - - - 4,498 Prepaid expenses 365,523 - - - - - 365,523 Inventory 12,492 1,185,311 - 84,622 - 10,723 1,293,148 Total current assets 15,158,181 2,677,371 2,302 1,465,665 182,536 2,877,621 22,363,676 Noncurrent assets: Bonds payable, net of Advances to other funds - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 Net capital assets 81,748,817 1,374,113 2,311,400 7,328,480 7,876,009 1,875,758 102,514,577 Total noncurrent assets 81,748,817 1,374,113 3,311,400 7,328,480 7,876,009 1,875,758 103,514,577 Total assets 96,906,998 4,051,484 3,313,702 8,794,145 8,058,545 4,753,379 125,878,253 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable 345,029 423,600 1,381 33,806 65,984 73,323 943,123 Salaries payable 71,938 76,219 - 51,499 46,075 77,995 323,726 Accrued interest payable 393,224 - 4,554 - 58,846 - 456,624 Contracts payable 256,094 - - 595,442 69 121,896 973,501 Due to other funds - - 171,184 588,910 157,403 16,946 934,443 Due to other governments 11,731 153,430 46 3,256 8,003 11,880 188,346 Deposits payable 112,216 - - - - - 112,216 Unearned revenue - 9,736 - 83,801 - 9,775 103,312 Compensated absences payable 63,187 113,145 - 107,349 20,061 59,417 363,159 Bonds payable - current 3,670,000 - 80,000 - 210,000 - 3,960,000 Total current liabilities 4,923,419 776,130 257,165 1,464,063 566,441 371,232 8,358,450 Noncurrent liabilities: Net OPEB obligation 44,104 27,351 - 37,890 17,628 27,973 154,946 Compensated absences payable 94,780 169,718 - 161,023 30,091 89,127 544,739 Bonds payable, net of unamortized discounts 25,964,905 - 241,620 1,138,325 4,870,045 - 32,214,895 Advances from other funds - - - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 Total noncurrent liabilities 26,103,789 197,069 241,620 2,337,238 4,917,764 117,100 33,914,580 Total liabilities 31,027,208 973,199 498,785 3,801,301 5,484,205 488,332 42,273,030 Net position: Net investment in capital assets 51,857,818 1,374,113 1,989,780 6,354,919 2,795,895 1,753,862 66,126,387 Restricted for debt service - - 611,377 - - - 611,377 Unrestricted 14,021,972 1,704,172 213,760 (1,362,075) (221,555) 2,511,185 16,867,459 Total net position $65,879,790 $ 3,078,285 $ 2,814,917 $ 4,992,844 $ 2,574,340 $ 4,265,047 $83,605,223 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 30 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Operating revenues: Sales - liquor Sales - retail Sales - utilities Sales - concessions Memberships Admissions Building rental Rental of equipment Greens fees Otherfees Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central Services Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Intergovernmental Investment income Donations Interest and fiscal charges Amortization of bond premiums (discounts) Gain (loss) on sale of capital asset, net of recoveries Miscellaneous Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Income (loss) before transfers Transfers: Transfers in Transfers out Total transfers Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Total $ - $13,462,933 $ - $ 147,581 $ - $ - $ 13,610,514 - 248,624 3,090 210,814 36,055 37,677 536,260 17,165,523 - - - - - 17,165,523 - - 114,868 188,850 231,813 171,210 706,741 - - 398,626 80,437 2,120 87,702 568,885 - - 365,272 50,985 103,289 755,241 1,274,787 - - 46,199 63,982 1,462,079 335,197 1,907,457 - - - 303,748 2,368 156,966 463,082 - - - 1,386,194 - 182,125 1,568,319 664,902 - - 279,152 105,247 899,515 1,948,816 17,830,425 13,711,557 928,055 2,711,743 1,942,971 2,625,633 39,750,384 - 9,964,763 42,376 286,581 83,530 102,925 10,480,175 1,594,233 1,384,831 319,089 1,479,179 741,639 1,615,229 7,134,200 6,614,352 538,765 149,732 532,947 688,457 586,620 9,110,873 880,880 73,598 49,211 343,421 118,877 282,997 1,748,984 655,093 223,334 19,904 147,845 44,130 155,656 1,245,962 3,148,601 79,122 233,946 390,743 446,588 223,688 4,522,688 12,893,159 12,264,413 814,258 3,180,716 2,123,221 2,967,115 34,242,882 4,937,266 1,447,144 113,797 (468,973) (180,250) (341,482) 5,507,502 489,387 - - - - - 489,387 (4) 16,080 7,596 4,585 21 (106,126) (77,848) - - 765 - 17,984 8,106 26,855 (980,241) - (9,214) (19,246) (149,273) - (1,157,974) 125,214 - 540 147 (16) - 125,885 - 1,787 - 15,800 - - 17,587 800 3,000 - - - - 3,800 (364,844) 20,867 (313) 1,286 (131,284) (98,020) (572,308) 4,572,422 1,468,011 113,484 (467,687) (311,534) (439,502) 4,935,194 (100,000) (1,340,100) (100,000) (1,340,100) 468,681 557,345 280,167 1,306,193 (1,440,100) 468,681 557,345 280,167 (133,907) Change in net position 4,472,422 127,911 113,484 994 245,811 (159,335) 4,801,287 Net position - January 1 as previously reported 61,568,761 2,950,374 2,705,647 4,991,850 2,392,648 4,424,382 79,033,662 Change in accounting principle (161,393) - (4,214) - (64,119) - (229,726) Net position - January 1 as restated 61,407,368 2,950,374 2,701,433 4,991,850 2,328,529 4,424,382 78,803,936 Net position - December 31 $65,879,790 $ 3,078,285 $ 2,814,917 $ 4,992,844 $ 2,574,340 $ 4,265,047 $ 83,605,223 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 31 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: State grant 489,387 - - Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds - 489,387 Transfer from other funds - - - 468,681 557,345 280,167 1,306,193 Transfer to other funds (100,000) Nonmajor - - - (1,440,100) Proceeds from interfund borrowing - Aquatic Golf 50,214 2,822,804 Enterprise (442,991) (491,452) (293,968) Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Total Cash flows from operating activities: (53,604) (522,968) (122,784) 1,604,100 (879,409) 330,381 355,716 Receipts from customers and users $ 17,828,536 $ 13,713,175 $ 928,055 $ 2,736,913 $ 1,895,673 $ 2,625,375 $ 39,727,727 Payment to suppliers (8,024,087) (10,817,511) (260,976) (1,291,840) (1,191,670) (1,107,280) (22,693,364) Payment to employees (1,554,389) (1,351,642) (319,512) (1,440,787) (733,210) (1,595,001) (6,994,541) Donations received - - 765 - 17,984 8,106 26,855 Miscellaneous received 800 3,000 - - - - 3,800 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 8,250,860 1,547,022 348,332 4,286 (11,223) (68,800) 10,070,477 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: State grant 489,387 - - - - - 489,387 Transfer from other funds - - - 468,681 557,345 280,167 1,306,193 Transfer to other funds (100,000) (1,340,100) - - - - (1,440,100) Proceeds from interfund borrowing - 1,308,584 171,184 1,135,419 157,403 50,214 2,822,804 Payment of interfund borrowing (442,991) (491,452) (293,968) - (1,594,157) - (2,822,568) Net cash provided by (used in) noncapital financing activities (53,604) (522,968) (122,784) 1,604,100 (879,409) 330,381 355,716 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Proceeds from capital debt - Acquisition of capital assets (6,670,868) Proceeds from disposals of capital assets - Principal paid on bonds (3,400,000) Interest and fiscal charges paid on bonds (933,969) Net cash provided by (used in) capital and related - 1,138,472 - - 1,138,472 (41,313) (80,242) (2,980,243) (1,201,016) (206,498) (11,180,180) 1,787 - 1,322,694 - - 1,324,481 - (140,000) (310,000) (100,000) - (3,950,000) (10,600) (22,315) (124,427) - (1,091,311) financing activities (11,004,837) (39,526) (230,842) (851,392) (1,425,443) (206,498) (13,758,538) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest received 21,289 11,206 5,294 3,212 21 (102,796) (61,774) Net increase (decrease) in cash and investments Cash and investments - January 1 Cash and investments - December 31 (2,786,292) 995,734 - 760,206 (2,316,054) (47,713) (3,394,119) 12,681,750 - - - 2,316,054 2,898,793 17,896,597 $ 9,895,458 $ 995,734 $ - $ 760,206 $ - $ 2,851,080 $ 14,502,478 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 32 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Nonmajor Aquatic Golf Enterprise Utilities Liauor Center Course Arena Funds Total Reconciliation of operating income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating income (loss) $ 4,937,266 $ 1,447,144 $ 113,797 $ (468,973) $ (180,250) $ (341,482) $ 5,507,502 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 3,148,601 79,122 233,946 390,743 446,588 223,688 4,522,688 Donations - - 765 - 17,984 8,106 26,855 Miscellaneous revenue (expense) 800 3,000 - - - - 3,800 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables (221,862) - - (9,073) (47,298) (268) (278,501) Decrease (increase) in special assessments 220,786 - - - - - 220,786 Decrease (increase) in due from other governments (813) - - - - - (813) Decrease (increase) in inventory (6,017) (103,036) - (15,164) 72 (124,145) Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses (11,963) - - - - - (11,963) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 141,856 85,599 201 32,439 (259,648) 20,181 20,628 Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 11,702 7,368 (423) 10,509 5,457 13,249 47,862 Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 2,362 386 46 1,679 2,972 665 8,110 Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue - 1,618 - 34,243 - 10 35,871 Increase (decrease) in net OPEB obligation 4,462 3,324 - 4,448 2,647 2,413 17,294 Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 23,680 22,497 - 23,435 325 4,566 74,503 Total adjustments 3,313,594 99,878 234,535 473,259 169,027 272,682 4,562,975 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Noncash investing activities: Increase (decrease) in fair value of investments $ 8,250,860 $ 1,547,022 $ 348,332 $ 4,286 $ (11,223) $$ (68,800 $ 10,070,477 (50,488) Noncash capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of capital assets with contracts payable 873,583 Increase (decrease) in accounts receivable related to insurance recoveries - (4,266) (2,015) (1,201) - (128,162) (186,132) 13,233 - (523,264) 884,701 (60,496) 1,187,757 - - (1,306,893) - - (1,306,893) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 33 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION AGENCYFUNDS December 31, 2013 Assets Cash and investments Liabilities Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governmental units Total liabilities Agency Funds $ 386,562 $ 34,049 10,161 342,352 $ 386,562 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 34 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS { December 31, 2013. Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Edina (the City) was incoeporated in 1888 and operates under the State of Minnesota Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five- member City Council elected by,voters of the City. The finandi.al.Irstatements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as applied to governmental units'by,the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following is a summary of significant accounting policies. A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY The City's financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b) ' organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the naturel and significance of their, relationship: with the primary government are such that exclusion .would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit's governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the City: COMPONENT UNITS In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the component, unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended component unit. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City..However, for financial reporting purposes, the. HRA is reported as if it were part of the City's operations because the members of the City Council serve:as HRA-board members and its activity is confined to the City of Edina. The activity of the HRA is reported:in the Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA. B. GOVERNMENT -WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. 35 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or business -type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business -type activity. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business -type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in a single column in the fund financial statements C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and fiduciary fund financial statements. The City's only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due. Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the City. 36 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 The City reports the following major governmental funds: The general fund is the government's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are restricted for housing and redevelopment. The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on the Tax Increment, General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, and Public Project Revenue Bonds. The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as restricted in the City's capital improvement budget. The City reports the following major proprietary funds: The utility fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer and recycling services to the City's residents. The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City's three liquor stores. The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City's aquatic center. The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City's three golf courses and a golf dome. The arena fund accounts for the operation of the City's ice arena. Additionally, the City reports the following fund type: Agency - the police seizure and Public Safety Training Facility funds account for fees collected for other government agencies and the payroll fund accounts for payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks but not yet sent to the appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care deductions, etc). As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned. 37 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the utilities, liquor, aquatic center, golf course, arena, art center, edinborough park, centennial lake, and sports dome enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for an allowable use, it is the City's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on long -term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities. D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Cash and Investments The cash balances of the City and its component units fund are pooled and invested for the purpose of increasing earnings through investment activities. The pool's investments are reported at fair value at year end, except for investments in 2a7 -like external investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. The City has the ability and intent to hold its investments to maturity. The individual funds' portions of the pool's fair value are presented as "Cash and investments." Earnings from such investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund. The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash and investment balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit, until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the government -wide financial statements. Restricted Cash and Investments Restricted cash and investments represent bond proceeds held for specific purposes. Earnings on these investments are allocated directly to these funds. 38 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 E. RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loans are classified as "due to /from other funds." All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2013 are planned to be eliminated in 2014. Interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2013 that are not expected to be eliminated in 2014 are classified as "Advances to /from other funds ". Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business -type activities are reported in the government -wide financial statements as "internal balances." Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material for other receivables and have not been reported. F. REVENUE RECOGNITION 1. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy /assessment date) of each year for collection in the following year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported. GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and delinquent taxes and State credits received by the City in July, December and January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes and credits not received at the year -end are classified as delinquent and due from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by the City in January are fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because they are not available to finance current expenditures. icy' CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with State Statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do) prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit sale. Pursuant to State Statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes special assessment revenue in the period that the assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special assessments are not material and have not been reported. GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments that are collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are completely offset by deferred inflows of resources. The following is a breakdown of special assessments receivable at December 31, 2013: 40 Enterprise Governmental Funds Funds Debt Service Construction Utilities Special assessments receivable Delinquent $47,402 $0 $27,932 Deferred 14,575,472 655,487 280,968 Total $14,622,874 $655,487 $308,900 40 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 G. INVENTORIES AND PREPAID ITEMS Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenses when consumed rather than when purchased. All inventories use the first -in /first -out (FIFO) method. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government -wide and fund financial statements and are recorded as expenses when consumed. H. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, parks, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets such as easements, are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are also reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the governmental fund financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Infrastructure assets include all of the City's assets since inception. Property, plant and equipment of the primary government are depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Life Golf course 10 - 35 years Land improvements 15 - 50 years Buildings and structures 15 - 40 years Furniture and office equipment 5 - 10 years Vehicles and equipment 3 - 20 years Parks 5 - 100 years Utility infrastructure 20 - 50 years Capital assets that are not depreciated include land, easements, and construction in progress. 41 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 COMPENSATED ABSENCES It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of generally accepted accounting principles no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave benefits are liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation. In the government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long -term debt and other long -term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business -type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bond using the straight -line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued plus any premium received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. K. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS /INFLOWS OF RESOURCES In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense /expenditure) until then. The government has no items that qualify for reporting in this category. In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The government has only one type of item, which arises only under a modified accrual basis of accounting and qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the governmental funds balance sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenues from two sources: property taxes and special assessments not collected within 60 days of year -end. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period that the amounts become available. !P•� CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 L. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures /expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures /expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures /expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds. All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers. M. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATION In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: • Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long -term assets. • Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. • Committed — Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts. • Assigned — Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. In the fund balance policy, authority to assign amounts for specific purposes is limited to the City Council. • Unassigned — The residual classification for the general fund which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. 43 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 N. NET POSITION In the government -wide financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in three components: Net investment in capital assets - Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long -term debt used to build or acquire the capital assets. Restricted net position — Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. Unrestricted net position — All other net position that do not meet the definition of "restricted" or "net investment in capital assets." O. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates. P. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE During the year ended December 31, 2013, the City has implemented GASB Statement No 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities. GASB Statement No. 65 identified specific items previously reported as assets that will now be classified as either deferred outflows of resources or outflows (expenditures /expenses), and items previously reported as liabilities that will now be reported as either deferred inflows of resources or inflows (revenues). The standard requires retroactive implementation, which resulted in the restatement of net position as of December 31, 2012 due to the write -off of bond issuance costs, which had been recorded as deferred charges and amortized in the past. 44 Note 2 RECONCILIATION:OF GOVERNMENT -WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A. EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTAL FUND. BALANCE SHEET AND THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION The governmental fund balance sheet includes a reconciliation be fund. balance —total governmental funds and net position — governmental activities as repoited.in the government -wide statement.of net position. One element of that reconciliation explains that "long -term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds." The details of this difference are as follows: Bonds payable $ (55,452,345) Plus: issuance premium (1,442,363) Less: issuance discount 281,240 Accrued interest payable (747,302) OPEB obligation (1,333,029) Compensated absences (31898,653) Net adjustment to reduce fund balance - total go%mmental funds to arrive at net position - gmernmental activities $ (62,592,452) B. EXPLANATION OF CERTAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERN NMENTAL . FUND.'STATEMENT'OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES','AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES AND THE GOVERNMENT -WIDE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances includes a reconciliation between net changes in fund balances — total governmental funds and changes in net position of governmental activities as reported in the government -wide statement of activities. Onelelement of that reconciliation explains that "Governmental -funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets are allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense_." The details of this difference are as follows: Capital outlay $ 9;388,626 Depreciation expense (7,456,252) Net adjustment to increase net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at changes in net position of govemmental funds $ 1,932,374 45 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Another element of that reconciliation states that "The issuance of long -term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net position. Also, governmental funds report the effect of premiums, discounts and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities." The details of this difference are as follows: Debt issued or incurred: Issuance of general obligation bonds $ (5,710,000) Issuance of permanent improvement revolving bonds (2,555,000) Less discounts 60,335 Plus premiums (275,361) Principal repayments: Tax increment debt 550,000 General obligation debt 2,000,000 Permanent improvement revolving debt 5,745,000 Public project revenue debt 6,225,000 Edina emerald energy program revenue bonds 11,375 Net adjustment to decrease net changes in fund balances - total govemmental funds to arrive at changes in net position of govemmental activities $ 6,051,349 Another element of that reconciliation states that "Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds." The details of this difference are as follows: OPEB obligation $ (208,916) Compensated absences 103,196 Accrued interest 113,922 Amortization of bond discounts and premiums 131,588 Net adjustment to decrease net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at changes in net position of govemmental activities $ 139,790 11 D., CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 3 CASH AND INVESTMENTS A. COMPONENTS OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS Cash and investments at year -end consist of the following: Deposits $ 2,636,618 Cash on hand 19,660 Investments 59,410,840 $ 62,067,118 Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows: Cash and investments - Statement of Net Position $ 58,273,619 Restricted cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 3,406,937 Cash and investments - Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 386,562 $ 62,067,118 The City had restricted investments of $3,406,937 as of December 31, 2013 that represent unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects and debt payments. B. DEPOSITS In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits: Custodial credit risk — In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City's deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The City's investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of collateral required. 47 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 At year -end, the carrying amount of the City's deposits was $2,636,618 while the balance on the bank records was $2,607,777. At December 31, 2013, all deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. C. INVESTMENTS The City has the following investments at year end: U.S. Treasuries GNMA SBA Notes U.S. Agencies Bankers Acceptance Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Municipals Negotiable CD's Money Market' 4M Fund' Total investments Credit Risk Interest Risk - Maturity Duration in Years Rating Agency < 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 >10 Total N/R N/R AA + /Aaa AA + /Aaa Al /Aa 3 AAA/Aaa AWAa 1 AA/Aa 3 AA/Aa2 AA/Aa 1 AA + /Aaa AA + /Aa2 AA + /Aa 1 Aa2 Aa3 AA N/R AAA N/R N/A N/A S &P/Nldys S &P/IVldys S &P /Mdys S &P /Mdys S &P/IVldys S &P/Mdys S &P/Mdys S &P /Mdys S &P/Mdys S &P/Mdys S &P /Mdys Mdys Mdys S &P N/A S &P N/A $ $ 336,379 $ 528,525 $ 483,181 - - 108,998 64,814 49,007 265,055 12,969 7,186,503 3,539,552 6,371,043 2,435,570 8,636,153 - - - 510,128 192,257 373,271 - 50,126 - 503,160 511,025 15,016 560,175 1,998,924 - - 116,796 - 504,745 74,040 1,645,000 680,830 - - 211,103 - - 42,197 - 11,509,058 1,710,068 245,004 $32,243,831 $ 7,131,496 $ 7,164,623 $ 4,930,722 N /A- Not Applicable N/R - Not Rated - The Citys money market investments do not have maturities $ 1,348,085 108,998 391,845 19,532,668 8,636,153 702,385 373,271 50,126 1,014,185 575,191 1,998,924 116,796 2,223,785 680,830 211,103 42,197 13,464,130 51,470,672 4,518,498 3,421,670 $59,410,840 The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is an external investment pool not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) that follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC under rule W. The City's investment in the 4M Fund is measured at the net asset value per share provided by the pool, which is based on an amortized cost method that approximates fair value. 48 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant: Custodial credit risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker - dealer) the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City's investment policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. Credit risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations rated "AK or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker - dealers. The City's investment policies specifically address credit risk, further limiting the City's exposure to credit risk by requiring that all state and local government obligations to be rated "AX or better by a national rating agency. Concentration risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the City's investment (considered 5 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as Treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The City's investment policies specifically address the City's desire to limit concentration risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year -end, the City's investments include 11.5% in securities issued by FNMA, 10.9% in securities issued by FHLB, 9.9% in securities issued by FHLMC and 14.5% in Bankers Acceptances with U.S. Bank. 49 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Interest rate risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City's investment policies specifically address the City's desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set specific guidelines for measurement of this risk. Note 4 CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows: Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements Buildings and structures Furniture and office equipment Vehicles and equipment Infrastructure Parks Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net (14,648,314) Beginning (14,724,508) (1,828,162) Ending (318,174) Balance Increases Decreases Balance Governmental activities: (611,119) (97,416,298) (7,456,252) Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $ 15,981,364 $ 2,655,757 $ - $ 18,637,121 Easements 111,000 - 111,000 Construction in progress 5,670,607 5,857,357 (4,780,366) 6,747,598 Total capital assets not being depreciated 21,762,971 8,513,114 (4,780,366) 25,495,719 Capital assets being depreciated: Land improvements 22,719,252 199,530 - 22,918,782 Buildings and structures 63,690,536 109,328 - 63,799,864 Furniture and office equipment 3,641,272 203,563 - 3,844,835 Vehicles and equipment 14,942,808 820,125 (466,026) 15,296,907 Infrastructure 90,951,630 4,060,674 (831,861) 94,180,443 Parks 15,630,395 262,658 (10,000) 15,883,053 Total capital assets being depreciated 211,575,893 5,655,878 (1,307,887) 215,923,884 Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements Buildings and structures Furniture and office equipment Vehicles and equipment Infrastructure Parks Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net (14,648,314) (703,286) (14,724,508) (1,828,162) (2,211,418) (318,174) (9,268,398) (1,276,942) (48,754,075) (2,718,569) (7,809,585) (611,119) (97,416,298) (7,456,252) (15,351,600) (16,552,670) (2,529,592) 421,038 (10,124,302) 831,861 (50,640,783) 10,000 (8,410,704) 1,262,899 (103,609,651) 114,159,595 (1,800,374) (44,988) 112,314,233 Governmental activities capital assets, net $135,922,566 $ 6,712,740 $ (4,825,354) $137,809,952 50 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Business -type activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land Construction in progress Total capital assets not being depreciated Capital assets being depreciated: Land improvements & golf course Buildings and structures Furniture and office equipment Vehicles and equipment Utility infrastructure Lease property capital lease Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements & golf course Buildings and structures Furniture and office equipment Vehicles and equipment Utility infrastructure Lease property capital lease Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net Business -type activities capital assets, net Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance $ 1,088,965 $ - $ - $ 1,088,965 19,927,135 9,563,093 (14,990,998) 14,499,230 21,016,100 9,563,093 (14,990,998) 15,588,195 9,764,376 73,943 9,838,319 18,855,830 4,382,173 23,238,003 153,303 - 153,303 6,722,825 387,597 (89,793) 7,020,629 96,091,103 10,576,615 106,667,718 430,614 - 430,614 132,018,051 15,420,328 (89,793) 147,348,586 (5,594,633) (348,279) - (5,942,912) (11,490,363) (738,121) - (12,228,484) (131,620) (4,973) - (136,593) (3,958,097) (511,725) 89,793 (4,380,029) (34,383,982) (2,919,590) - (37,303,572) (430,614) - (430,614) (55,989,309) (4,522,688) 89,793 (60,422,204) 76,028,742 10,897,640 86,926,382 $ 97,044,842 $ 20,460,733 $ (14,990,998) $102,514,577 51 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Depreciation expense was charged to functions /programs of the primary government as follows: Govemmental activities: General govemment $ 555,936 Public safety 1,065,535 Public works 3,980,482 Parks 1,854,299 Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $ 7,456,252 Business -type activities: Utilities $ 3,148,601 Liquor 79,122 Aquatic Center 233,946 Golf Course 390,743 Arena 446,588 Art Center 26,227 Edinborough Park 161,113 Centennial Lakes 36,348 Total depreciation expense - business -type activities $ 4,522,688 CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS At December 31, 2013, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments related to the remaining contract balances are summarized as follows: $ 1,517,619 52 Contract Remaining Project # Project Description Amount Commitment 12 -6A Eng Woodale Bike Lane Re- Striping $ 32,874 $ 5,702 13 -1 Eng Mendelssohn Lane 1,233,546 67,279 13 -10NB Eng Lake Edina Landscape 14,930 6,702 13 -2 Eng Normandale Road 1,738,562 173,865 13 -3 Eng Braemar Hills Neighborhood 944,807 54,088 Various Countryside Park Playground and Path 842,789 84,541 NA Arden Park Irrigation 15,320 5,362 Various Golf Dome 605,802 23,405 Various Sports Dome 627,000 551,760 13 -9 Eng Raw Water Line on Vernon 188,558 4,319 12 -1 PW Water Meter Replacement 3,618,864 540,596 $ 1,517,619 52 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 INSURANCE RECOVERY The Braemar Golf Dome collapsed on February 10, 2012 as the result of a fire. The fire and collapse resulted in a total loss according to the City's insurance carrier. The total amount to be paid by the insurance carrier for the Dome collapse is $2,633,453. Of this amount, the City received $716,168 in 2012, $1,306,893 in 2013 and recorded the remaining $610,392 as a receivable at year end. The final receivable amount was paid to the City on February 8, 2014. At the time of the collapse the net book value of the Golf Dome was $27,330. As a result, a $2,606,123 gain on sale of capital asset, net of recoveries was recorded in 2012. On August 6, 2013 a hail storm caused significant damage to various facilities resulting in a large insurance claim. The City's insurance carrier paid the City $940,361 on January 16, 2014, which was recorded as a receivable at year end. $123,707 of the proceeds were distributed to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Association (PSTF); which the City has a joint venture agreement with, to cover damage to the facility. The remaining $816,654 in proceeds was recorded as insurance recovery revenue, and was used to fund the newly created non -major capital projects Environmental Efficiency Fund. The insurance proceeds will be used to fund energy efficiency projects, and going forward this fund will account for funds received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies. 53 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 5 LONG -TERM DEBT The City has five types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2013: general obligation bonds, permanent improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds, Edina emerald energy program revenue bonds and G.O. revenue bonds. The first type is payable from general property taxes. The second type is payable solely from special assessments with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The third type is payable solely from annual appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fourth type is payable solely from special assessments. The fifth type is payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity's long -term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business -type activities. GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES As of December 31, 2013, the governmental long -term bonded debt of the financial reporting entity consisted of the following: Final Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2013 General Obligation Bonds: General Obligation - Park & Recreation Refunding, 2005A 3.50 -4.00% 7/19/2005 2/1/2017 5,375,000 2,210,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Ran, 2007A 4.00 -4.25% 5/24/2007 2/1/2028 5,865,000 4,805,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Ran, 2009A 3.00 -4.40% 4/29/2009 2/1/2030 14,000,000 12,425,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Ran, 2010A 2.00 -4.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2021 8,285,000 6,240,000 General Obligation - Capital Improvement Ran, 2013A - Refunding 3.00 -3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 5,710,000 5,710,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 39,235,000 31,390,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving (RR) Bonds: Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2008B 3.00 -4.00% 8/28/2008 2/1/2020 7,755,000 5,725,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2010B 2.00 -3.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2022 2,305,000 2,095,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2011A 2.00 -3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2023 3,320,000 3,320,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A 3.00 -4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2029 2,675,000 2,675,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A - Refunding 3.00 -4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2019 1,990,000 1,990,000 Permanent Irprovement Revolving, 2013A 3.00 -3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 2,555,000 2,555,000 Total RR Bonds 20,600,000 18,360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds: Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 3.50 -4.13% 9/13/2005 5/1/2026 5,425,000 3,995,000 Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10 -4.55% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 2,595,000 1,645,000 Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 8,020,000 5,640,000 Edina Emerald Energy Program (EEEP) Revenue Bonds: Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012A 7.00% 2/2512012 1/1/2023 33,690 30,321 Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012B 5.50% 8/28/2012 1/1/2018 40,030 32,024 Total EEEP Bonds 73,720 62,345 Total bonded indebtedness - governmental activities 54 $ 67,928,720 $ 55,452,345 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS _.. _ December 31, 2013 BUSINESS -TYPE ACTIVITIES Final Interest Issue M_ aturity Original Payable Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2013 Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00 - 3.00% 4/29/2009 1/1/2017 $ 2,010,000 $ 320,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series'2009C 2.00= 4.00% 12/10/2009 2/1/2030 2,440,000 2,160,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2612B .45- 1.60% 11/15/2012 2/1/2020 815,000 815,000 - Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00- 3.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2033 2,160,000 2,100,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00 -3.45% 10/10/2013 2/1/2029 1,125,000 1,125,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B 4.00% 5/24/2007 2/112017 8,210,000 3,635,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A 3.0074.25% 8128/2008 2/1/2019 13,985,000 8,640,000 utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2022 11,230,000 10,265,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00 -4.00% 11/15/2012 2/112023 6,100,000 6,100,000 Total Revenue Bonds 48,015,000 35,160,000 Total bonded indebtedness - business -type activities $ 48,015,000 $ 35,160,000 Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the City's bonds are as follows: Governmental Activities General Public Improvement Public Project Year Ending Obligation Bonds Revolving Bonds Revenue Bonds" December 31 Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2014 $ 2,295,000 $ 1,090,686 $ 1,555,000 $ 548,927 $ 235,000 $ 223,754 2015 2,350,000 -" 1,039,543 1,760,000 512,169 245,000 214,154 2016 2,425;000 952,593 1,960,000 452,944 255,000 204,154 2017 2,495,000 862,993 2,035,000 388,772 265,000 193,154 2018 1,990,000 782,343 2,060,000 320,538 405,000 180,648 2019 -2023 9,205,000 2,829,487 6,440,000 777,126 2,270,000 647,965 2024 -2028 7,905,000 1,353,516 1,925,000 247,400 1,965,000 164,695 2029 -2033 2,725,000 112,974 _625,000 17,313 - - Total $ 31,390,000 $ 9,024,135 $ 18,360,000 $ 3,265,189 $ 5,640,000 $ 1,829,124 Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Edina Emerald Energy Program Revenue Year Ending Revenue Bonds Bonds December 31 Principal Interest Principal Interest 2014 $ - $ 1,942 $ 3,960,000 $ 1,060,272 2015 11,375 3;546 4,195,000 936,658 2016 11,375 2,870 4,350,000 795,745 2017 11,375 2,193 4,500,000 647,351 2018 11,375 1,517 3,565,000 514,233 " 2019 -2023 16,845 2,948 11,415,000 1,209,991 2024 -2028. - - 1,900,000 353,946 2029 -2033 - - 1,275,000 78,414 Total $ 62,345 $ 15,016 $ 35,160,000 $ 5,596,610 55 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 CHANGE IN LONG -TERM LIABILITIES Long -term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2013, was as follows: For governmental activities, compensated absences and other postemployment benefit obligations are generally liquidated by the general fund. In 2012, the City issued $10,765,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2012A to finance a current refunding of the 2014 through 2019 maturities of the City's $5,870,000 General obligation bonds, Series 2007C and to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects. Savings from the current proceeds were not placed in escrow and the General obligation bonds, Series 2007C were redeemed February 1, 2013. The current refunding was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $441,749 and resulted in an economic gain of $382,241. The City anticipates that utility revenues and special assessments to benefited properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. 3M Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year Governmental activities: Bonds payable: Tax increment $ 550,000 $ - $ (550,000) $ - $ - General obligation 27,680,000 5,710,000 (2,000,000) 31,390,000 2,295,000 RR 21,550,000 2,555,000 (5,745,000) 18,360,000 1,555,000 Public project revenue 11,865,000 - (6,225,000) 5,640,000 235,000 EEEPrevenue 73,720 - (11,375) 62,345 - Less deferred amounts: Discount on bonds (250,076) (60,335) 29,171 (281,240) - Premiums 1,327,761 275,361 (160,759) 1,442,363 - Total bonds payable 62,796,405 8,480,026 (14,662,963) 56,613,468 4,085,000 Compensated absences 4,001,849 1,859,841 (1,963,037) 3,898,653 1,559,461 Governmental activity Long -term liabilities $ 66,798,254 $ 10,339,867 $ (16,626,000) $ 60,512,121 $ 5,644,461 Business -type activities: Bonds payable: Revenue bonds $ 37,985,000 $ 1,125,000 $ (3,950,000) $ 35,160,000 $ 3,960,000 Less deferred amounts: Discount on bonds (60,668) (14,513) 5,087 (70,094) - Preniums 1,187,976 27,985 (130,972) 1,084,989 - Total bonds payable 39,112,308 1,138,472 (4,075,885) 36,174,895 3,960,000 Compensated absences 833,395 821,486 (746,983) 907,898 363,159 Business -type activity Long -term liabilities $ 39,945,703 $ 1,959,958 $ (4,822,868) $ 37,082,793 $ 4,323,159 For governmental activities, compensated absences and other postemployment benefit obligations are generally liquidated by the general fund. In 2012, the City issued $10,765,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2012A to finance a current refunding of the 2014 through 2019 maturities of the City's $5,870,000 General obligation bonds, Series 2007C and to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects. Savings from the current proceeds were not placed in escrow and the General obligation bonds, Series 2007C were redeemed February 1, 2013. The current refunding was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $441,749 and resulted in an economic gain of $382,241. The City anticipates that utility revenues and special assessments to benefited properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. 3M CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 The City issued $8,265,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2013A to finance a current refunding of the 2014 through 2030 maturities of the City's $6,125,000 General obligation bonds, Series 20098 and to finance various street infrastructure improvement projects. Savings from the current proceeds were not placed in escrow and the General obligation bonds, Series 20098 were redeemed October 31, 2013. The current refunding was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $351,199 and resulted in an economic gain of $254,693. The City anticipates that special assessments to benefited properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issue. REVENUE PLEDGED Future revenue pledged for the payment of long -term debt is as follows: Bond Issue Revenue Fledged % of Total Debt Term of Use of Proceeds Type Service Pledge Current Year Remaining Principal Fledged Principal and Interest Revenue and Interest Paid Received 2009B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf course improvements Golf 100% 2009 -2013 $ - $ 313,100 $ 2,711,743 2009B Recreational Facility Bonds Fool improvement Fool 100% 2009.2017 339,300 150,600 928,055 2009C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2010 -2030 2,943,400 180,600 1,942,971 2012B Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013 -2020 847,956 5,573 1,942,971 2012C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013 -2033 2,840,884 38,253 1,942,971 2013B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf dome improvements Golf 100% 2014 -2029 1,443,686 - 2,711,743 2003C Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure utility 100% 2003 -2013 - 376,568 17,830,425 2007B Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2007 -2017 3,933,100 981,800 17,830,425 2008A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2008 -2019 9,732,431 1,604,969 17,830,425 2011A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2012 -2022 11,493,775 1,216,500 17,830,425 2012A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2013 -2023 7,182,075 154,133 17,830,425 Note 6 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN The City is subject to a statutory limitation by the State of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina's legal debt margin for 2013 is computed as follows: December 31, 2013 Market Value (after fiscal disparities) $ 8,798,600,609 Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) $ 263,958,018 Amount of debt applicable to debt limit: Total bonded debt $ 90,612,345 Less: Public improvement revolving bonds (18,360,000) Revenue bonds (35,160,000) EEEP revenue bonds (62,345) Total debt applicable to debt limit $ 37,030,000 Legal debt margin $ 226,928,018 57 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 7 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A. PLAN DESCRIPTION All full -time and certain part-time employees of the City of Edina are covered by defined benefit plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost - sharing, multiple - employer retirement plans. These plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Chapters 353 and 356. GERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, firefighters and peace officers who qualify for membership by statute are covered by the PEPFF. PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by State Statute, and vest after five years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step -rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7% for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7% of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7% for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 3.0% for each year of service. For all PEPFF and GERF members hired prior to July 1, 1989 whose annuity is calculated using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. Normal retirement age is 55 for PEPFF and 65 for Basic and Coordinated members hired prior to July 1, 1989. Normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66 for Coordinated members hired on or after July 1, 1989. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible members seeking early retirement. There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A single -life annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree — no survivor annuity is payable. There are also various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will be payable over joint lives. Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. 58 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - December 31, 21)13 The bene.fit:provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitledto benefits but 'are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time'they`last terminated their public service. PERA issue's a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for GERF and PEPFF. That report may be obtained on the intern et `at www.mnpera.org, by writing to PERA at 66. Empire Drive #200, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55103- 2088.or by calling (651) 296 -7460, or 1- 800 - 652 -9026. B. FUNDING POLICY Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. These statutes are established and amended by the state legislature., The City makes annual contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. GERF Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 9.1 % and 6.25 %, respectively, of their covered salary in 2013. PEPFF members were �. required to contribute 9.6% of their covered salary in 2013. The City of Edina is required to contribute.the following percentages of annual covered payroll: 11.78% for Basic Plan members, 7.25 %o'f6r Coordinated Plan members, and 114.4% for PEPFF members. The City's contributions to the Public Employees Retirement Fund _ for,the years ending December 31, 2013,'2012, and 2011 were $1,097,869, $1,044',217, and $1,000,753, respectively. The City's contributions to the Public'Employees Police and Fire Fund for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were $1,046,021, $1,020,720, and $1,024,566, respectively:`The City's contributions were equal to the contractually required contributions for'each year as set by state statute'. Note 8 OTHER POST- EMPLOYMENT'BENEFITS PLAN A. Plan Description The City provides post- employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through City's Other Post - Employment Benefits Plan, a single - employer defined benefit plan administered by the City. All post - employment benefits are based ,on contractual agreements with employee groups. These contractual agreements do not include any specific contribution or funding requirements. These benefits are summarized as follows: Post - Employment Insurance Benefits — All retirees of the City have.the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance. 59 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an "implicit rate subsidy." This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City's younger and statistically healthier active employees. B. Funding Policy The required contribution is based on projected pay -as- you -go financing requirements, with additional amounts to pre -fund benefits as determined annually by the City. Historically the City has chosen pay -as- you -go financing for OPEB, generally this liability is liquidated by all funds that employ full -time employees on a pro -rata basis. C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required contributions (ARC) of the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis in accordance with the parameters of codification Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the City's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the City's net OPEB obligation to the plan: Annual required contribution $ 311,061 Interest on net OPEB obligation 56,779 Adjustment to annual required contribution (48,696) Annual OPEB cost (expense) 319,144 Contributions made (92,934) Increase in net OPEB obligation 226,210 Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 1,261,765 Net OPEB obligation - end of year $ 1,487,975 The City's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the past three years are as follows: .f Percentage of Fiscal Annual Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB Year Ended OPEB Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation December 31, 2011 $ 321,790 $ 110,471 34.3% $ 1,027,345 December 31, 2012 308,120 73,700 23.9% 1,261,765 December 31, 2013 319,144 92,934 29.1% 1,487,975 .f CITY•OF EDINA, MINNESOTA v NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - December 31, 2013 D. Funded Status and funding Progress As of January 1, 2012, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan' was zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $2,959,876, and the actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $2,959,876. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $18,220,189, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 16.2 percent. Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve `estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the'funded status of the plan and ARCs of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of. Funding - Progress immediately following the notes to the basic financial statements presents multi= year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing overtime relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. E. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefts provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of. benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long -term perspective of -the calculations. In the January 1, 2012 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5 percent investment rate of return (net of, administrative expenses) based on the City's own investments; a 3.0 percent general inflation rate, a payroll.growth rate of 3.75 percent, and an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 9.0 percent initially, reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after twelve years. The UAAL is being amortized as a level percentage of payroll. The remaining amortization period at January 1, 2012 was 30 years on an "open" basis. 61, I .. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 9 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES, AND TRANSFERS The composition of due from other funds and due to other funds account balances as of December 31, 2013, is as follows: Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount Liquor Arena $ 157,403 Golf Course 317,103 Sports Dome 16,946 Utility Golf Course 271,807 Aquatic Center 171,184 Total $ 934,443 The composition of advances to other funds and advances from other funds account balances as of December 31, 2013, is as follows: Receivable Fund Aquatic Center Payable Fund Amount Golf Course $1,000,000 The City's interfund receivables and payables eliminate what would have been negative cash balances. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 $ 765,100 $ 559,350 $ 2,148,514 $ 468,681 $ 557,345 $ 280,167 $ 4,779,157 Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by another fund. Some of the City's interfund transfers fall under that category. Non - routine transfers include the following: 1. The liquor fund transferred $765,100, $100,000, $160,000 and $165,000 to the general fund, golf course fund, arena, and art center funds, respectively, to subsidize operations. 2. The construction fund transferred $68,681, $97,345, $66,803 and $48,364 to the golf course, arena, edinborough park, and centennial lakes funds, respectively, to subsidize capital improvements to those facilities. 3. The HRA fund transferred $559,350 of tax increment revenues to the debt service fund to pay principal and interest on outstanding tax increment debt. 4. The HRA fund transferred $105,642 to the construction fund to cover the cost of HRA projects paid for by the construction fund. 5. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 and $150,000, respectively, to the construction fund to fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2013 budget. 6. The general fund transferred $1,697,872 of the 2012 unassigned fund balance to the construction, golf course and arena funds; $1,097,872 to fund various projects and equipment replacement within the construction fund, $300,000 to fund unplanned expenses at the arena, and $300,000 to the golf course to start stabilizing the fund deficit. 7. The general fund transferred $695,000 to the construction fund for use of park reserves from the parkland dedication money received in 2012. 63 Transfer In: Debt Nonmajor General Service Construction Golf Course Arena Enterprise Total Transfer out: General Fund $ $ - $ 1,792,872 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ $ 2,392,872 HRA Fund 559,350 105,642 - - 664,992 Construction Fund - - 68,681 97,345 115,167 281,193 Utilities Fund 100,000 - - - 100,000 Liquor Fund 765,100 150,000 100,000 160,000 165,000 1,340,100 $ 765,100 $ 559,350 $ 2,148,514 $ 468,681 $ 557,345 $ 280,167 $ 4,779,157 Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by another fund. Some of the City's interfund transfers fall under that category. Non - routine transfers include the following: 1. The liquor fund transferred $765,100, $100,000, $160,000 and $165,000 to the general fund, golf course fund, arena, and art center funds, respectively, to subsidize operations. 2. The construction fund transferred $68,681, $97,345, $66,803 and $48,364 to the golf course, arena, edinborough park, and centennial lakes funds, respectively, to subsidize capital improvements to those facilities. 3. The HRA fund transferred $559,350 of tax increment revenues to the debt service fund to pay principal and interest on outstanding tax increment debt. 4. The HRA fund transferred $105,642 to the construction fund to cover the cost of HRA projects paid for by the construction fund. 5. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 and $150,000, respectively, to the construction fund to fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2013 budget. 6. The general fund transferred $1,697,872 of the 2012 unassigned fund balance to the construction, golf course and arena funds; $1,097,872 to fund various projects and equipment replacement within the construction fund, $300,000 to fund unplanned expenses at the arena, and $300,000 to the golf course to start stabilizing the fund deficit. 7. The general fund transferred $695,000 to the construction fund for use of park reserves from the parkland dedication money received in 2012. 63 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City of Edina is the administering authority for the following Tax Increment Districts: District number 1202 (Grandview Commercial Area) is a redevelopment district established in 1984 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2010. Although the main district is decertified, the City continued to receive increments from a sub - district until the outstanding debt was retired in 2012. Increment previously collected is available for expenditures within the district. District number 1203 (Southeast Edina Redevelopment District — Centennial Lakes) is a redevelopment district established in 1988 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2016. District number 1208 (Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District) is an economic development district established in 2012 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2022. The following table reflects values as of December 31, 2013: Original tax capacity Current tax capacity Fiscal Disparities Tax capacity change Captured tax capacity value: Retained captured tax capacity Total bonds issued (general obligation) Amounts redeemed Outstanding bonds at December 31, 2013 TIF #1202 TIF #1203 TIF #1208 Total $ 22,872 $ 229,691 $ 8,458,727 $ 8,711,290 787,409 3,581,728 9,615,790 13,984,927 - - 348,272 348,272 764,537 3,352,037 808,791 4,925,365 $ 764,537 $ 3,352,037 $ 808,791 $ 4,925,365 $ 9,637,555 $ 35,894,724 $ - $ 45,532,279 9,637,555 35,894,724 - 45,532,279 64 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 11. CONTINGENCIES A. RISK MANAGEMENT The City is exposed to various risks of loss,related to torts, theft of, damage to and . destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees;'and, natural disasters. Worker's compensation. insurance is provided through Travelers insurance, there is no deductible. The City has a $579,693 deposit premium that is subject to adjustment based on the actual audited payroll. Automobile and general liability coverage is provided through Travelers insurance. The City pays an annual premium -for this coverage and all claims are paid from the plan . up to the annual maximum of $1,500,000 for automobile and $1,500,000 for general liability. The City is not subject to a deductible for general liability coverage. The deductible for automobile insurance is $1,000 for comprehensive and $1,000 for collision. Property coverage is also provided through Travelers insurance. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and all claims are paid for by the plan. The City has $10,000 - $50,000 deductibles per occurrence depending on claim type, with annual maximum coverage of $139,188,285. Police professional insurance coverage is provided through Travelers insurance. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and has a $10,000 deductible per occurrence, with a $1,5001000 annual maximum. Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three years. There were not significant reductions in insurance coverage during 2013. B. LITIGATION The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs. C. FEDERAL AND STATE -FUNDS The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant, agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such audits -could become a liability of the applicable fund. However; in the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the City at December 31, 2013. 65 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 D. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS The City's tax increment districts are subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements. Note 12 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION As of December 31, 2013, the City of Edina had 4 series of Housing and Health Care Revenue Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $30,235,000. The bonds are payable solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. Note 13 JOINT VENTURE The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a Board consisting of one representative from each Member. On dissolution of the Association, the Facility shall revert to the City of Edina, and all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the Cost Sharing Formula. In accordance with the joint venture agreement, each member of the association will share in the cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City's equity interest in the capital assets of the PSTF was $1,584,465. Complete financial statements for PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. Note 14 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The City pays an annual membership fee to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the City paid a total of $47,072 in membership fees to the PSTF. The City also pays an annual membership fee to the 1-494 Corridor Commission as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the commissions and projects department and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the City paid a total of $13,513 in membership fees to the 1-494 Corridor Commission. .. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 15 FUND BALANCES A. Classifications At December 31, 2013, a summary of the City's governmental fund balance classifications are as follows: Total Assigned 1,559,461 8,354,268 9,913,729 Unassigned 12, 573,457 - 12, 573,457 Total Fund Balance $ 14,331,635 $ 11,495,641 $ 6,246,769 $ 10,856,561 $ 2,361,529 $ 45,292,135 B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned general fund balance of 42 %-47% of the subsequent year's budgeted property tax revenue. As of December 31, the City has $12,573,457 of unassigned fund balance in the general fund, or 56.2% of 2014 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $2,049,968 above the goal range identified in the policy. 67 Nonmajor General Fund HRA Fund Debt Service Construction Funds Total Nonspendable Prepaid items $ 13,322 $ $ $ $ $ 13,322 Restricted Park dedication 185,395 165,395 Tax increments - 11,495,641 11,495,641 Debt service - 6,246,769 6,246,769 Unspent bond proceeds - 2,502,293 2,502,293 Pedestrian and cyclist improvements - 492,362 492,362 Energy efficiency projects 816,654 816,654 Forfeitures 631,763 631,763 Grant funds 85,580 85,580 Donations 335,170 335,170 Total Restricted 185,395 11,495,641 6,246,769 2,502,293 2,361,529 22,791,627 Assigned Compensated absences 1,559,461 - - - - 1,559,461 Construction commitments - 397,539 397,539 Special projects 384,027 384,027 Equipment 2,862,844 2,862,844 Construction 4,709,858 4,709,858 Total Assigned 1,559,461 8,354,268 9,913,729 Unassigned 12, 573,457 - 12, 573,457 Total Fund Balance $ 14,331,635 $ 11,495,641 $ 6,246,769 $ 10,856,561 $ 2,361,529 $ 45,292,135 B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned general fund balance of 42 %-47% of the subsequent year's budgeted property tax revenue. As of December 31, the City has $12,573,457 of unassigned fund balance in the general fund, or 56.2% of 2014 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $2,049,968 above the goal range identified in the policy. 67 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2013 Note 16 GASB STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET IMPLEMENTED GASB Statement No. 68 replaces the requirements of Statement No. 27, "Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Governmental Employers" and Statement No. 50, "Pension Disclosures," as they relate to governments that provide pensions through pension plans administered as trusts or similar arrangements that meet certain criteria. Statement No. 68 requires governments providing defined benefit pensions to recognize their long -term obligation for pension benefits as a liability for the first time, and to more comprehensively and comparably measure the annual costs of pension benefits. .: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 2013 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Revenues: General property taxes: Current $ 21,864,994 $ 21,699,894 $ 22,002,497 $ 302,603 Penalties and interest 12,000 12,000 4,030 (7,970) Total general property taxes 21,876,994 21,711,894 22,006,527 294,633 Franchise taxes: 714,000 730,000 794,261 64,261 Licenses and permits: 2,577,500 2,866,814 4,122,305 1,255,491 Intergovernmental: 20,000 20,000 25,792 5,792 Federal: 36,000 36,000 61,112 25,112 State: 7,700 7,700 22,470 14,770 Municipal state aid 195,000 195,000 195,000 - Other 60,000 60,000 133,288 73,288 State aid - police 350,000 350,000 347,445 (2,555) State aid - fire - - 378,603 378,603 Health programs 119,000 119,000 118,977 (23) Total intergovernmental 760,000 760,000 1,234,425 474,425 Charges for services: City Clerk 6,500 6,500 11,593 5,093 Planning Department 25,000 25,000 109,507 84,507 Housing Foundation Contract 28,000 28,000 26,766 (1,234) HRA Services 22,000 22,000 25,775 3,775 Police Department 270,000 270,000 321,030 51,030 Fire Department 20,000 20,000 25,792 5,792 Ambulance fees 1,720,000 1,779,000 1,839,569 60,569 Health Department 7,700 7,700 22,470 14,770 Building Department 25,000 25,000 19,540 (5,460) Engineering 180,000 180,000 196,387 16,387 Park Registration 105,000 105,000 139,828 34,828 Senior Center 98,000 98,000 69,947 (28,053) Communications 74,000 74,000 106,235 32,235 Other fees 4,000 4,000 16,854 12,854 50th & France Assessment 69,000 69,000 69,000 - Charges to other funds 484,044 564,048 564,048 - Total charges for services 3,138,244 3,277,248 3,564,341 287,093 Fines and forfeits 1,034,000 1,034,000 1,017,219 (16,781) Miscellaneous: Investment income 161,000 161,000 53,583 (107,417) Rental of property 395,000 476,000 518,862 42,862 Donations 12,000 12,000 934 (11,066) Other 6,000 6,000 4,605 (1,395) Total miscellaneous 574,000 655,000 577,984 (77,016) Total revenues 30,674,738 31,034,956 33,317,062 2,282,106 69 CITY OF, EDINA;.MINNESOTA F- REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 2013 Budgeted Amounts :Actual variance with Original Final Amounts Final Budget Expenditures: Current: General government: Mayor and' Council: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total :mayor and council Administration: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services . ,total administration Communications: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total communications Planning: . Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total planning Finance: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total finance Election: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central 'services Total election $ 49,540 $ 49,540 13,700 13,700 1,500 1,500 27,660 27,804 92,400 92,544 878,078 1,087,403 185,800. 202,100 3,000 3,000 72,252 73,020 1,139,130 1,365,523 466,825 512,472 236,950 236,950 48,500 48,500 57,000 57,552 809,275 855,474 $ 45,820 $ 3,720 16,501 (2,801) 4,293 (2,793) 27;192 612 . 93,806 (1,262) 1,020,803 66,600 219,776 (17,676) 9,717 (6,717) 74,391 (1,371) 1,324;687 40,836 562,773 (50,301) 325,455 (88,505) 38,633 9,867 58,060 (508) 984,921 (129,447) 38,700 38,700 90,766 (52,066) 6,000 6,000 31018 2,982 44,916 45,384 46,059 (675) 491,496 504,926 604,437 (99,511) 534,037 539,319 531,918 7,401 105,850 105,850 ,104,308 1,542 3,500 3,500 - 1,863 1,637 62,880 63,660 65,443 (1,783) 706,267 712,329 703,532 8,797 111,398 112,052 104,373 7,679 17,575 17,575 16,133 1,442 14,500 14,500 10;094 4,406 12,516 12,732 13,505 (773) 155,989 156,859 144,105 12,754 70 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA.. REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Public safety: Police protection: Personal services Contractual services Commodities ' Central services Total police' protection Fire protection: .Personal services Contractual' services' Commodities Central services Total fire protection Animal Control: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total animal control 7,261,976 7,155,357 7,153,725 1,632 417,584 417,584 370,920 2013 80,558 80,558 Budgeted Amounts Actual . Variance with 1,036,476 Original Final Amounts Final Budget Assessing: 51,151 3,906,783 3,905,975 -. - Personal services $ 701,984 $ 699,228 $ 680,933 $ 18,295 Contractual services 113,441 113,441 89,008 24,433 Commodities .2,900 2,900 1,264 1,636 CentraI.services 66,552 67,260 68,831. 74,551 Total.assessing 884,877 882,829 840;036 42,793 Legal and court services: (2,796) 2,541 2,547 1,308 Contractual services 388,500 388,500 410,200 (21,700) Commissions and projects: 95,064 96;446 (1,382) _.. Personal services 200,000 200,000 366,932 (166,932) ` Contractual services 645;916 542,916 342,273 200,643, ' Commodities 2,000 2,000 68,507 (66,507) Total commissions and projects 847,916 744,916 777,712 (32,796) Total general government (179,536) 5,515,850 5,703,900.: 5,883,436 Public safety: Police protection: Personal services Contractual services Commodities ' Central services Total police' protection Fire protection: .Personal services Contractual' services' Commodities Central services Total fire protection Animal Control: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total animal control 7,261,976 7,155,357 7,153,725 1,632 417,584 417,584 370,920 46,664 80,558 80,558 55,003 251555 1,030,008 1,036,476 1,059,176 (22,700) 8,790,126 8,689,975 8,638,824 51,151 3,906,783 3,905,975 4,258,088 (352,113) 366,120 366,120 379,561 (13,441) 176,400 176,400 277;052 (100,652) 327,156 329,940 345,769 (15,829)` 4,776,459 4,778,435 5,260,470 (482,035) 74,551 74,745 74,123 622 8,592 8,592 11,388 (2,796) 2,541 2,547 1,308 1,239 9,096 91180 9,627 (447) 94,786 95,064 96;446 (1,382) 71 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Public health: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total public health Inspections: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total inspections Total public safety Public works: Administration: Personal services Contractual services Central services Total administration Engineering: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total engineering Street maintenance: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total street maintenance Total public works Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 293,942 203,027 2,325 31,428 530,722 $ 292,760 203,027 2,325 31,704 529,816 2013 Actual Amounts $ 234,938 162,270 2,322 32,205 431,735 Variance with Final Budget $ 57,822 40,757 3 (501) 98,081 964,349 1,035,401 1,085,852 (50,451) 107,600 114,600 107,285 7,315 9,410 9,410 18,563 (9,153) 107,532 108,468 110,760 (2,292) 1,188,891 1,267,879 1,322,460 (54,581) 15,380,984 15,361,169 15,749,935 (388,766) 207,505 6,800 25,908 240,213 997,200 74,250 18,400 129,276 1,219,126 2,428,373 757,000 1,041,200 925,752 5,152,325 6,611,664 72 6,800 26,316 33,116 1,300,695 74,250 18,400 130,380 1,523,725 2,471,074 757,000 1,041,200 927,360 5,196,634 6,753,475 35,196 4,804 28,282 68,282 1,206,752 104,774 18,438 139,472 1,469,436 2,396,154 714,811 1,046,061 996,242 5,153,268 6,690,986 (35,196) 1,996 (1,966) (35,166) 93,943 (30,524) (38) (9,092) 54,289 74,920 42,189 (4,861) (68,882) 43,366 62,489 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED) For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Parks: Administration: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total administration Recreation: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total recreation Maintenance: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Total maintenance Total parks Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfer from other funds Transfer to other funds Total financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Budgeted Amounts Original Final $ 693,665 $ 722,525 28,604 28,604 3,166 3,166 85,284 86,388 810,719 840,683 194,760 194,946 180,887 180,887 54,810 54,810 430,457 430,643 2013 Actual Amounts $ 719,118 32,462 23,478 89,197 864,255 183,081 126,314 49,552 358,947 Variance with Final Budget $ 3,407 (3,858) (20,312) (2,809) (23,572) 11,865 54,573 5,258 71,696 1,640,084 1,659,266 1,763,412 (104,146) 529,171 529,171 386,462 142,709 211,813 211,813 168,234 43,579 309,096 309,936 331,122 (21,186) 2,690,164 2,710,186 2,649,230 60,956 3,931,340 3,981,512 3,872,432 109,080 31,439,838 31,800,056 32,196,789 (396,733) (765,100) (765,100) 1,120,273 1,885,373 765,100 765,100 765,100 - - (2,392,872) (2,392,872) - 765,100 (1,627,772) (1,627,772) - $ - $ (2,392,872) (507,499) $ 1,885,373 73 14,839,134 $ 14,331,635 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) FUND For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Revenues: Tax increment collections Investment income Total revenues Expenditures: Personal services Contractual services Capital outlay Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing uses: Transfers out Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Budgeted Amounts Original Final 2013 Actual Amounts Variance with Final budget $ 3,990,000 $ 3,990,000 $ 3,981,938 $ (8,062) 169,000 169,000 (116,524) (285,524) 4,159,000 4,159,000 3,865,414 (293,586) 175,030 109,256 112,312 3,056 711,000 711,000 1,077,559 366,559 3,000,000 200,000 2,711,056 2,511,056 3,886,030 1,020,256 3,900,927 2,880,671 272,970 3,138,744 (35,513) (3,174,257) (559,350) (3,559,350) (664,992) 2,894,358 $ (286,380) $ (420,606) 74 (700,505) $ (279,899) 12,196,146 $ 11,495,641 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION OTHER POST - EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 75 Unfunded Unfunded Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll January 1, 2008 $ 4,638,477 $ - $ 4,638,477 0.0% $ 17,071,318 27.2% January 1, 2010 $ 2,966,250 $ - $ 2,966,250 0.0% $ 17,786,616 16.7% January 1, 2012 $ 2,959,876 $ - $ 2,959,876 0.0% $ 18,220,189 16.2% 75 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31;,2013; . Note A . LEGAL COMPLIANCE — BUDGETS The. City follows these procedures in establishing, the budgetary data reflected in the preceding schedules: 1. The City°Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The'. budget is. legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the -City; Council. 4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year. 5. Budgets for the General Fund, HRA, debt service, construction, CDBG, police special revenue, Braemar memorial, and PACS funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted_ accounting principles (GAAP). 6. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council- approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. 7. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department in the General Fund unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year -end. 76 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2013 Note B EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS The General Fund is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose expenditures exceed budget appropriations. General Fund General Government Mayor and council Communications Planning Legal and court services Commissions and projects Public Safety Fire protection Animal control Inspections Public Works Administration Parks Administration Final Over Budget Actual Budget $ 92,544 $ 93,806 $ 1,262 855,474 984,921 129,447 504,926 604,437 99,511 388,500 410,200 21,700 744,916 777,712 32,796 4,778,435 5,260,470 482,035 95,064 96,446 1,382 1,267,879 1,322,460 54,581 33,116 68,282 35,166 840,683 864,255 23,572 Excess expenditures in the General Fund mayor and council department are due to higher than anticipated expenses related to conferences attended along with unbudgeted IPad purchases. Excess expenditures in the communications department are due to the hiring of a new employee to handle the Southwest Suburban Cable commission, along with equipment purchases related to this position. The increased expenditures are funded by additional video production revenue and member contributions. Excess expenditures in the planning department are due to a newly created residential reconstruction position that was not budgeted for and are funded by additional permit revenue received. In addition, higher than anticipated expenses related to small area plans during the year which are funded by additional revenue received from developers. Excess expenditures in the legal and court services department are due to increased legal counsel sought as a result of additional court cases. Excess expenditures in the commissions and projects department are due to numerous retirements and related severance payments. Excess expenditures in the fire protection department are due to a change made in the way we account for fire aid as requested by the State auditor. Excess expenditures in the animal control department are due to higher than expected impound fees. 77 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION December 31, 2013 Excess expenditures in the inspections department are due to higher than anticipated permit applications during the year and are funded by additional permit revenue received. Excess expenditures in the public works administration department are due to the retirement of an employee and their related severance payment. Excess expenditures in the parks administration department are due to increased printing expenses related to the park and recreation insider magazine and are funded by increased recreation program registrations. The HRA, debt service, construction, CDBG, police special revenue, and braemar memorial, and PACS funds budgets are legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level for these funds. The following is a listing of funds whose expenditures exceed budget appropriations. HRA Fund Debt Service Fund CDBG Fund Final Budget Actual $ 1,020,256 $3,900,927 6,670,685 16,801,634 145,365 193,340 Over Budget $2,880,671 10,130, 949 47,975 Excess expenditures in the HRA fund are due to the purchase of land for development of additional parking in the 50`h and France area. Excess expenditures in the debt service fund are due to an unbudgeted refunding of 2007C and 2009B bonds. Excess expenditures in the CDBG fund are due to higher than anticipated expenses related to rehabilitation projects. 78 NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The following are nonmajor special revenue funds: Community Development Block Grant Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Police Special Revenue Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received for specific purposes within the police department, including E -911 and forfeiture funds. Braemar Memorial Fund - This fund was established to account for funds donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf course with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed as a necessity to the golf course. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for pedestrian and cyclist improvements included in future street reconstruction projects. Capital Project Funds A Capital Project Fund is used to account for and report financial resources used for the acquisition of capital assets. The following is a nonmajor capital project fund: Environmental Efficiency Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies. 79 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS December 31, 2013 Capital Special Revenue Projects Community Police Pedestrian Total Nonmajor Development Special Braemar and Cyclist Environmental Governmental Block Grant Revenue Memorial Safety Efficiency Funds Assets Cash and investments $ - $ 672,977 $ 334,178 $ 228,772 $ - $ 1,235,927 Accrued interest receivable - 448 992 327 - 1,767 Accounts receivable - - - 285,209 816,654 1,101,863 Due from other governments 108,222 48,779 - - - 157,001 Total assets $ 108,222 $ 722,204 $ 335,170 $ 514,308 $ 816,654 $ 2,496,558 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 108,222 $ 4,861 $ - $ 4,537 $ - $ 117,620 Contracts payable - - - 17,409 - 17,409 Total liabilities 108,222 4,861 - 21,946 - 135,029 Fund balance: Restricted - 717,343 335,170 492,362 816,654 2,361,529 Total fund balance - 717,343 335,170 492,362 816,654 2,361,529 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 108,222 $ 722,204 $ 335,170 $ 514,308 $ 816,654 $ 2,496,558 :E CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Revenues: Franchise Taxes Intergovernmental Fines and forfeitures Investment income Other Total revenues Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Public works Capital Outlay: Public works Total expenditures Revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Insurance recovery Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Capital Special Revenue Projects Community Police Pedestrian Total Nonmajor Development Special Braemar and Cyclist Environmental Governmental Block Grant Revenue Memorial Safety Efficiency Funds $ - $ - $ - $1,018,308 $ - $ 1,018,308 193,340 62,831 - 15,000 - 271,171 - 92,491 92,491 794 2,570 1,078 - 4,442 - - 786 - - 786 193,340 156,116 3,356 1,034,386 - 1,387,198 193,340 - - - - 193,340 - 96,775 - - - 96,775 - - - 80,004 - 80,004 - - - 462,020 - 462,020 193,340 96,775 - 542,024 - 832,139 - 59,341 3,356 492,362 - 555,059 - - - - 816,654 816,654 - 59,341 3,356 492,362 816,654 1,371,713 - 658,002 331,814 - - 989,816 $ - $ 717,343 $ 335,170 $ 492,362 $ 816,654 $ 2,361,529 81 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Revenues: Intergovernmental Expenditures: Current: Contractual services Net increase in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Actual Amounts Variance with Final budget $ 145,365 $ 145,365 $ 193,340 $ 47,975 145,365 145,365 193,340 47,975 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Expenditures: Current: Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total expenditures Net increase in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 85,574 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with 18,655 Original Final Amounts Final budget Revenues: 243,654 243,654 96,775 (146,879) Intergovernmental $ 104,760 $ 104,760 $ 62,831 $ (41,929) Fines and forfeiture 57,821 57,821 92,491 34,670 Investment income 600 600 794 194 Total revenues 163,181 163,181 156,116 (7,065) Expenditures: Current: Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total expenditures Net increase in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 85,574 85,574 42,493 (43,081) 18,655 18,655 54,282 35,627 139,425 139,425 - (139,425) 243,654 243,654 96,775 (146,879) $ (80,473) $ (80,473) 59,341 $ 139,814 83 658,002 $ 717,343 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - BRAEMAR MEMORIAL SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 84 331,814 $ 335,170 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget Revenues: Investment income $ 300 $ 300 $ 2,570 $ 2,270 Donations 3,000 3,000 786 (2,214) Total revenues 3,300 3,300 3,356 56 Expenditures: Current: Contractual services 25,000 25,000 - (25,000) Capital outlay - 75,000 - (75,000) Total expenditures 25,000 100,000 - (100,000) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ (21,700) $ (96,700) 3,356 $ 100,056 Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 84 331,814 $ 335,170 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLE SAFETY -- SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final:, Amounts- Final - budget Revenues: Franchise taxes $ - $ 800,000 $ 1,01811308 $ 218,308 Intergovernmental - - 15,000 151000 Investment income - - 11078 1,078 Total revenues - 800,000 1,034,386 234,386 Expenditures: Current: Central services - 80,004 80,004 - Capital outlay - 719,996 462,020 (257,976) Total expenditures - 800,000 542,024 (257,976) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ - $ - 492,362 $ 492,362 Fund balance - January 1 - Fund balance.- December 31 $ 492,362 [ -A MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Debt Service Fund - This fund was established to account for the payment of principal and interest on the Tax Increment, General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, and Public Project Revenue Bonds. Construction Fund - This fund was established to account for various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's capital improvement budget. 1 -h CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUND - DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Expenditures: Debt Service 6,670,685 6,670,685 16,801,634 10,130,949 Revenues over (under) expenditures (637,998) (637,998) (9,972,741) (9,334,743) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with - - 99,433 Original Final Amounts Final budget Revenues: - - 146,319 146,319 Total other financing General property taxes $ 3,930,418 $ 3,930,418 $ 3,892,598 (37,820) Special assessments 2,072,269 2,072,269 2,837,227 764,958 Intergovernmental - - 118,780 118,780 Investment income 30,000 30,000 (19,712) (49,712) Total revenues 6,032,687 6,032,687 6,828,893 796,206 Expenditures: Debt Service 6,670,685 6,670,685 16,801,634 10,130,949 Revenues over (under) expenditures (637,998) (637,998) (9,972,741) (9,334,743) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 559,350 559,350 559,350 - Bonds issued - - 99,433 99,433 Refunding bonds issued - - 5,710,000 5,710,000 Premium (discount) on bonds issued - - 146,319 146,319 Total other financing sources (uses) 559,350 559,350 6,515,102 5,955,752 Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ (78,648) $ (78,648) (3,457,639) $ (3,378,991) Fund balance - January 1 9,704,408 Fund balance - December 31 $ 6,246,769 E.E. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUND - CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Expenditures: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Capital outlay . Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Sale of capital assets Bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Discount on bonds issued Total other financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 90,315 208,281 25,000 1,404 6,170,940 6,495,940 90,315 208,281 25,000 1,404 12,308,170 12,633,170 (3,875,916) (8,513,359) 250,000 (464,800) 3,451,500 3,250,000 (644,400) 4,251,000 110,159 202,837 74,096 1,489 7,517,131 7,905,712 (3,516,029) 2,148,514 (281,193) 61,642 2,455,567 87,359 (18,652) 19,844 (5,444) 49,096 85 (4,791,039) (4,727,458) 4,997,330 (1,101,486) 363,207 61,642 (1,795,433) 87,359 (18,652) 3,236,700 6,856,600 4,453,237 (2,403,363) $ (639,216) $ (1,656,759) 99 937,208 9,919,353 $ 10,856,561 $ 2,593,967 Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance with Original Final Amounts Final budget Revenues: General property taxes $ 992,072 $ 992,072 $ 992,631 559 Franchise fees - - 79,398 79,398 Special assessments 1,380,052 1,652,039 2,047,283 395,244 License and permits 25,000 25,000 28,207 3,207 Intergovernmental 50,000 1,090,000 884,790 (205,210) Charges for services 50,000 50,000 103,271 53,271 Investment income 122,900 110,700 (18,179) (128,879) Other revenues - 200,000 272,282 72,282 Total revenues 2,620,024 4,119,811 4,389,683 269,872 Expenditures: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Capital outlay . Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Sale of capital assets Bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Discount on bonds issued Total other financing sources (uses) Net increase (decrease) in fund balance Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 90,315 208,281 25,000 1,404 6,170,940 6,495,940 90,315 208,281 25,000 1,404 12,308,170 12,633,170 (3,875,916) (8,513,359) 250,000 (464,800) 3,451,500 3,250,000 (644,400) 4,251,000 110,159 202,837 74,096 1,489 7,517,131 7,905,712 (3,516,029) 2,148,514 (281,193) 61,642 2,455,567 87,359 (18,652) 19,844 (5,444) 49,096 85 (4,791,039) (4,727,458) 4,997,330 (1,101,486) 363,207 61,642 (1,795,433) 87,359 (18,652) 3,236,700 6,856,600 4,453,237 (2,403,363) $ (639,216) $ (1,656,759) 99 937,208 9,919,353 $ 10,856,561 $ 2,593,967 NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS Enterprise Funds j Enterprise-funds account for the financing of self - supporting activities of governmental` units which render. services to the general public on a use_ r charge -- basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds: Art Center Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the City's Art Center. Edinborough Park Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to Edinborough Park. Centennial Lakes Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to Centennial Lakes Park. sports Dome Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the Sports Dome. ,t CITY OF;EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBhNING;STATEMENT OF NET POSITION NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUN_ DS - December 31, 2013 Total Nonmajor .Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary Center Park- Lakes Dome Funds Assets 4,217 11,878 11,878 - 27,973 Compensated absences payable Current assets: 3:1,327 53,915 - 89,127 Total - noncurrent liabilities 8,102 Cash and investments $ 217,543 $ 1,573,726 $ 1,059,811 $ - $ 2,851,080 Interest receivable 330 2,351 5,309 - 7,990 Accounts receivable - 7,828 - - 7,828 Inventory 10,723 - - - 10,723 Total current assets 228,596 1,583,905 1,065,120 - 2,877,621 Noncurrent assets: Net capital assets 1701174 1,281,770 331,628 92,186 1,875,758 Total noncurrent assets 170,174 1,281'1770 331,628 92,186 1;875,758 Total assets 398,770 2,865,675 1,396,748 92,186 4,753,379 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts'payable 5,378 50,418 17,527 - 73,323 Salaries payable 11,742 36;831 29,422 - 77,995 Contracts payable - 46,656 - 75,240 121,896 Due to other funds - - - 16,946 16,946 Due to other governments 646- 7,751 3,483 - 11,880 Unearned revenue 9,725 30 20 - 9,775 Compensated absences payable 2,590 20,884 35,943 - 59,417 Total current liabilities 30,081 162,570 86,395 92,186 371,232 Noncurrent liabilities: Net OPEB obligation 4,217 11,878 11,878 - 27,973 Compensated absences payable 3,885 3:1,327 53,915 - 89,127 Total - noncurrent liabilities 8,102 43,205 65,793 - 117,100 Total liabilities 38,183 205,775 152,188 92,186 488,332 Net position: Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted. Total net position 170,174 1,235,114 331,628 16,946 1,753,862 190,413 1,424,786 912,932 (16,946) 2,511,185 $ 360,587 $. 2,659,900 $ 1,244,560 $ - $ 4,265,047 , 92 - -. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Operating revenues: Sales - retail Sales - concessions Memberships Admissions Building rental Rental of equipment Greens fees Class registration & other fees Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central Services Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) (140,628) 7,962 (208,816) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 1,088 (55,650) (51,564) Donations 7,341 - 765 Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) 8,429 (55,650) (50,799) Income (loss) before transfers (132,199) (47,688) (259,615) Transfers: Transfers in Change in net position Net position - January 1 Net position - December 31 165,000 66,803 48,364 32,801 19,115 (211,251) (341,482) (106,126) 8,106 (98,020) (439,502) 280,167 (159,335) 327,786 2,640,785 1,455,811 Total Nonmajor Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary Center Park Lakes Dome Funds $ 37,677 $ - $ - $ - $ 37,677 442 138,370 32,398 - 171,210 23,187 64,515 - - 87,702 - 755,241 - - 755,241 - 233,055 102,142 - 335,197 - 12,312 144,654 - 156,966 - - 182,125 - 182,125 405,715 219,563 274,237 - 899,515 467,021 1,423,056 735,556 - 2,625,633 8,863 80,981 13,081 - 102,925 396,222 649,978 569,029 - 1,615,229 84,864 328,538 173,218 - 586,620 49,597 134,824 98,576 - 282,997 41,876 59,660 54,120 - 155,656 26,227 161,113 36,348 - 223,688 607,649 1,415,094 944,372 - 2,967,115 Operating income (loss) (140,628) 7,962 (208,816) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 1,088 (55,650) (51,564) Donations 7,341 - 765 Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) 8,429 (55,650) (50,799) Income (loss) before transfers (132,199) (47,688) (259,615) Transfers: Transfers in Change in net position Net position - January 1 Net position - December 31 165,000 66,803 48,364 32,801 19,115 (211,251) (341,482) (106,126) 8,106 (98,020) (439,502) 280,167 (159,335) 327,786 2,640,785 1,455,811 - 4,424,382 $ 360,587 $ 2,659,900 $ 1,244,560 $ - $ 4,265,047 93 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Total Nonmajor Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary Center Park Lakes Dome Funds Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users $ 467,011 $ 1,416,096 $ 742,268 $ - $ 2,625,375 Payment to suppliers (187,178) (587,115) (332,987) - (1,107,280) Payment to employees (398,722) (644,124) (552,155) - (1,595,001) Donations received 7,341 - 765 - 8,106 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (111,548) 184,857 (142,109) - (68,800) Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfer from other funds 165,000 66,803 48,364 - 280,167 Proceeds from interfund borrowing 33,268 - - 16,946 50,214 Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 198,268 66,803 48,364 16,946 330,381 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of capital assets - (110,883) (78,669) (16,946) (206,498) Net cash used in capital and related financing activities - (110,883) (78,669) (16,946) (206,498) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest received 758 (51,990) (51,564) - (102,796) Net increase (decrease) in cash and investments 87,478 88,787 (223,978) - (47,713) Cash and investments - January 1 130,065 1,484,939 1,283,789 - 2,898,793 Cash and investments - December 31 $ 217,543 $ 1,573,726 $ 1,059,811 $ - $ 2,851,080 Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating loss $ (140,628) $ 7,962 $ (208,816) $ - $ (341,482) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation 26,227 161,113 36,348 - 223,688 Donations 7,341 - 765 - 8,106 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables - (6,960) 6,692 - (268) Decrease (increase) in inventory 72 - - - 72 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (1,970) 17,260 4,891 - 20,181 Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 1,394 4,947 6,908 - 13,249 Increase (decrease) in due to other governments (80) (372) 1,117 - 665 Increase(decrease)in unearned revenue (10) - 20 - 10 Increase (decrease) in OPEB payable 431 991 991 - 2,413 Increase(decrease)in compensated absences (4,325) (84) 8,975 - 4,566 Total adjustments 29,080 176,895 66,707 - 272,682 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (111,548) $ 184,857 $ (142,109) $ - $ (68,800) Noncash investing activities: Increase(decrease)in fair value of investments (289) (68,239) (59,634) - (128,162) Noncash noncapital financing activities: Acquisition of capital assets with contracts payable -. (4,576) 19,320 (75,240) (60,496) 94 FIDUCIARY FUNDS Aaencv Funds Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial capacity. The following are agency funds: Police Seizure Fund -This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police Department. Public Safety Training Facility - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture that the City has fiduciary responsibilities for. Payroll Fund - This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state & local governments, insurance providers, and others. M This page left blank intentionally. 96` CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AGENCYFUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2013 Balance Balance January 1 Additions Deductions December 31 POLICE SEIZURE Assets: Cash and investments $ 22,706 $ 1 $ - $ 22,707 Liabilities: Due to other governmental units $ 22,706 $ 1 $ - $ 22,707 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY Assets: Cash and investments $ 258,951 $ 1,080,975 $ 1,003,726 $ 336,200 Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 10,345 $ 283,390 $ 287,341 $ 6,394 Salaries payable 7,815 223,288 220,942 10,161 Due to other governmental units 240,791 574,297 495,443 319,645 Total Liabilities $ 258,951 $ 1,080,975 $ 1,003,726 $ 336,200 PAYROLL Assets: Cash and investments $ 35,301 $ 16,857,623 $ 16,865,269 $ 27,655 Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 35,301 $ 16,857,623 $ 16,865,269 $ 27,655 TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS Assets: Cash and investments $ 316,958 $ 17,938,599 $ 17,868,995 $ 386,562 Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 45,646 $ 17,141,013 $ 17,152,610 $ 34,049 Salaries payable 7,815 223,288 220,942 10,161 Due to other governmental units 263,497 574,298 495,443 342,352 Total Liabilities $ 316,958 $ 17,938,599 $ 17,868,995 $ 386,562 �*b This page left blank intentionally. 4.1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES AND TAX CAPACITY RATES (shown by year of tax collectibility) Tax capacity used for rate calculation 104,913,703 98,897,206 94,811,175 93,504,206 93,607,232 Fiscal disparities distribution 3,537,906 3,421,345 3,068,256 2,615,313 2,548,571 Adjusted net tax capacity $ 108,451,609 $ 102,318,551 $ 97,879,431 $ 96,119,519 $ 96,155,803 Tax levies: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total tax capacity $ 120,816,822 $ 113,981,017 $ 109,012,566 $ 106,529,983 $ 108,069,277 Increment valuation (4,960,337) (4,043,859) (3,917,958) (4,194,083) (4,948,237) Contribution to fiscal 3,212,757 3,174,308 3,040,890 3,314,581 3,325,597 disparities pool (10,942,782) (11,039,952) (10,283,433) (8,831,694) (9,513,808) Tax capacity used for rate calculation 104,913,703 98,897,206 94,811,175 93,504,206 93,607,232 Fiscal disparities distribution 3,537,906 3,421,345 3,068,256 2,615,313 2,548,571 Adjusted net tax capacity $ 108,451,609 $ 102,318,551 $ 97,879,431 $ 96,119,519 $ 96,155,803 Tax levies: General fund $ 20,737,472 $ 21,004,000 $ 21,604,402 $ 21,824,894 $ 22,509,403 Equipment 940,484 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 Debt service 3,212,757 3,174,308 3,040,890 3,314,581 3,325,597 Total certified tax levies 24,890,713 25,170,380 25,637,364 26,131,547 26,827,072 Referendum market value levy 602,250 615,837 610,862 615,837 627,800 Total levy Tax capacity rate: General fund revenue Bonds & interest Total tax capacity rate Market value rate $ 25,492,963 $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 $ 26,747,384 $ 27,454,872 20.004 21.548 23.131 23.762 2.968 3.112 3.116 3.454 22.972 24.660 26.247 27.216 0.00606 0.00654 .. 0.00667 0.00690 24.458 3.462 27.920 0.00695 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINED SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS December 31, 2013 Final Prior Years Interest Maturity Original Rates Date Date Issue Redeemed Tax Increment Bonds: Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 20050 3.00-3.40 07/19/05 02/01/13 $ 3,505,000 $ 2,955,000 Total Tax Increment Bonds 3,505,000 2,955,000 General Obligation Bonds: GO Park & Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005A GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2007A GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2009A GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2010A GO Equipment Certificates, Series 2010B GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2013A - Refunding Total General Obligation Bonds Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds: GO Permanent Improvement Revolving, Series 2005E GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2007C GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2008B GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2010B GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2011A GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2012A GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2012A - Refunding GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Series 2013A Total PIR Bonds Public Project Revenue Bonds: Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009B Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Edina Emerald Energy Program Revenue Bonds: Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012A Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012B Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Revenue Bonds: Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2003C Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A Total Public Project Revenue Bonds Total - Bonded indebtedness 3.50-4.00 07/19/05 02/01/17 5,375,000 2,665,000 4.00-4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 5,865,000 830,000 3.00-4.40 04/29/09 02/01/30 14,000,000 1,035,000 2.00-4.00 11/18/10 02/01/21 8,285,000 1,390,000 2.00 11/18/10 02/01/13 230,000 155,000 3.00-3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 - - 33,755,000 6,075,000 3.00-3.75 09/13/05 02/01/16 1,460,000 910,000 3.60-4.25 05/24/07 02/01/19 5,870,000 1,585,000 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 02/01/20 7,755,000 1,330,000 2.00-3.00 11/18/10 02/01/22 2,305,000 - 2.00-3.00 10/27/11 02/01/23 3,320,000 - 3.00-4.00 11/15/12 02/01/29 2,675,000 - 3.00 -4.00 11/15/12 02/01/19 1,990,000 - 3.00-3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 - - 25,375,000 3,825,000 3.00-4.13 09/13/05 05/01/26 5,425,000 1,205,000 2.10-4.55 11/24/09 02/01/30 2,595,000 950,000 1.95-5.80 11/24/09 02/01/30 6,125,000 125,000 14,145,000 2,280,000 7.00 02/25/12 01/01/23 33,690 - 5.50 08/28/12 01/01/18 40,030 - 73,720 - 2.00-3.00 04/29/09 01/01/17 2,010,000 1,240,000 2.00-4.00 12/10/09 02/01/30 2,440,000 180,000 .45-1.60 11/15/12 02/01/20 815,000 - 2.00-3.00 11/15/12 02/01/33 2,100,000 3.00-3.45 10/10/13 02/01/29 - - 1.10-3.55 03/01/03 02/01/13 3,200,000 2,830,000 4.00 05/24/07 02/01/17 8,210,000 3,755,000 3.00-4.00 08/28/08 02/01/19 13,985,000 4,100,000 2.00-3.00 10/27/11 02/01/22 11,230,000 - 3.00-4.00 11/15/12 02/01/23 6,100,000 - 50,090,000 12,105,000 $ 126,943,720 $ 27,240,000 100 101 Principal Interest Interest Outstanding 2013 Payable Due Due Payable 12/31/2012 Issued Payments 12/31/2013 In 2014 In 2014 to Maturity $ 550,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - 550,000 - 550,000 - - - 2,710,000 - 500,000 2,210,000 515,000 77,456 179,956 5,035,000 - 230,000 4,805,000 240,000 191,744 1,637,472 12,965,000 - 540,000 12,425,000 555,000 452,599- 4,624,833.. 6,895;00.0 - 655,000 6,240,000 675,000 236,100 1,051,000 75,000 - ,75,000 - - - - - 5,710,000 - 5,710,000' .. 310,000 132;787 1,530,874 .27,680,000 5,710,000 21000,000 31,390,000 2,295,000 1,090;686 9;024,135 550,000 - 550,000 - - - - 4,285,000 - 4,285,000 - - - - 6,425,000 - 700,000 5,725,000 720,000 201,194 811,330 2,305,000 - 210,000 2,095,000 215,000 47,750 251,625 3,320;000 - - 3,320,000 300,000 77,600 458,700 2,675,000 - - 2,675,000 - 87,750 755,975 1,990,000- - - 1,990,000 320,000 73,200 230,800 - 2,555,000 - 2,555,000 - 61,433 756,759 21,550,000 2,555,000 5,745,000 18,360,000_ 1,555,000 548,927 3,265,189 4,220;000 - 225,000 3,995,000 235,000 156,944 1,154,886 1,645,000 - - 1;645,000 - 66,810 674,238 6,000,000 - 6,000,000 - - - - 11,865,000 - 6,225,000 5,640;000: 235,000 223,754 1,829,124 33,690 - 3,369 30,321 - 1,061 10,613 40,030 - 8,006 32,024 - 881 4,403 73,720 - 11,315 62,345 - 1,942 15;016 770;000 - 450,000 320,000 80,000 8,200 19,300 2,260,000 - 100,000 2,160,000 100,000 78,350 783,400 815,000 - - 815,000 110,000 7,590 32,956 2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - 53,794 740,885 - 1,125,000 - 1,125,000 - 28,263 318,686 370,000 - 370,000 - - - - 4,455,000 - 820,000 3,635,000 855,000 128,300 298,100 9,885,000 - 1,245,000 8,640,000 1,295,000 317,075 1,092,431 11,230,000 - 965,000 10,265,000 1,050,000 231;350 1,228,777 6,100,000 - - 6,100,000 470,000 207,350 1,082,075 37,985,000 1,125,000 3,950,000 35,160,000 3,960,000 1,0601272 5,596,610 $ 99,703,720 $ 9,390,000 $ 18,481,375 $ 90,612,345 $ 8,045,000 $ 2,925,581 $ 19,730,074 101 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1202, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2013 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining Source of funds: Bond proceeds $ 4,500,000 $ 9,900,000 $ 9,475,915 $ - $ 424,085 Tax increments received - 29,737,107 18,939,878 - 10,797,229 Real estate sales * - 4,700,000 5,402,344 - (702,344) Interest on invested funds - 300,000 1,177,583 4,751 (882,334) Other - - 61,068 - (61,068) Total sources of funds: 41500,000 44,637,107 35,056,788 4,751 9,575,568 Uses of funds: Land acquisition - 6,500,000 4,984,728 - 1,515,272 Installation of public utilities and improvements 4,310,000 17,127,000 9,738,935 141,997 7,246,068 Bond payments: Principal - 9,900,000 9,637,555 - 262,445 Interest - 9,190,000 3,344,904 - 5,845,096 Loan /note interest - - 5,150,288 - (5,150,288) Paid to other governments - - 208,163 2,578 (210,741) Administrative costs 190,000 1,920,107 1,375,451 33,056 511,600 Total uses of funds: 4,500,000 44,637,107 34,440,024 177,631 10,019,452 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ - $ 616,764 $ (172,880) $ (443,884) Cost to authority Price paid by developer * Real estate sales 5229 Eden Ave. $ 1,822,319 5220 Eden Circle 995,000 5244 Eden Circle (condemnation deposit) 309,937 5201 Eden Circle 1,447,043 2,070,119 Project area 23,832 4,005,694 $ 4,598,131 $ 6,075,813 102 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -NO. 1203, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2013 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining Source of funds: Bond proceeds $ 41,400,000 $ - $ 33,761,677 $ - $ (33,761,677) Tax increments received 80,000,000 130,000,000 51,774,953 3,782,583 74,442,464 Real estate sales * 5,000,000 9,137,070 11,637,070 - (2,500,000) Special assessment - - - - - Interest on invested funds - 5,000,000 4,628,672 (124,864) 496,192 Transfer in - - 38,646,971 - (38,646,971) Sale of material - - 255,710 - (255,710) Developer payments - - 297,826 - (297,826) Other - - 21,799 - (21,799) Total sources of funds: 126,400,000 144,137,070 141,024,678 3,657,719 (545,327) Uses of funds: Land acquisition 13,900,000 30,000,000 22,981,425 - 7,018,575 Site improvements and preparation 26,677,000 15,000,000 14,494,553 2,952,077 (2,446,630) Other qualifying improvements - 50,337,070 6,718,758 - 43,618,312 Bond payments: Principal 41,400,000 - 35,344,724 550,000 (35,894,724) Interest 38,000,000 47,000,000 34,287,806 9,350 12,702,844 Administrative costs 1,140,800 1,800,000 1,530,556 254,266 15,178 Paid to other governments - - 55,572 2,578 (58,150) Loan /note interest - - 7,388,872 615,537 (8,004,409) Parkland dedication fees - - 2,030,345 - (2,030,345) Total uses of funds: 121,117,800 144,137,070 124,832,611 4,383,808 14,920,651 Funds remaining (deficit) $ 5,282,200 $ - $ 16,192,067 $ (726,089) $(15,465,978) Cost to authority Price paid by developer * Real estate sales Retail and theater site $ 3,213,720 $ 3,213,720 Medical office site 815,092 815,092 Office site 1,107,160 1,107,160 Office building #1 449,300 449,300 Office building #2 1,280,702 1,280,702 Office building #3 1,341,533 1,341,533 Office building #4 1,625,849 1,625,849 Office building #5 1,803,714 1,803,714 $ 11,637,070 $ 11,637,070 103 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR 70TH STREET AND CAHILL ROAD DISTRICT -NO. 1207, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2013 Source of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Interest on invested funds Total sources of funds: Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Demolition Relocation Capitalized interest Debt service Paid to other governments Administrative costs Total uses of funds: Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining $ 1,911,000 $ 1,911,000 $ - $ - $ 1,911,000 2,177,855 2,177,855 746,863 - 1,430,992 - - 305,955 3,216 (309,171) 4,088,855 4,088,855 1,052,818 3,216 3,032,821 529,400 529,400 47,580 1,699 480,121 325,000 325,000 540,279 - (215,279) 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 160,000 160,000 - - 160,000 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 2,178,455 2,178,455 - - 2,178,455 - - 2,730 - (2,730) 596,000 596,000 74,830 - 521,170 4,088,855 4,088,855 665,419 1,699 3,421,737 Funds remaining (deficit) $ - $ - $ 387,399 $ 104 1,517 $ (388,916) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF SOURCES AND USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR SOUTHDALE 2 -NO. 1208, A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT December 31, 2013 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount Budget Budget prior years year remaining Source of funds: Tax increments received $ 11,702,217 $ 11,702,217 $ - $ 199,356 $ 11,502,861 Interest on invested funds 250,000 250,000 - 456 249,544 Total sources 'of funds: 11,952,217 11,952,217 - 199,812 11,752,405 Uses of funds: Site improvements and preparation . Other qualifying improvements Interest Administrative costs _ Total uses of funds: Funds remaining (deficit) $ 2,274,296 2,274,296 - - 2,274,296 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 - - 3,577,921 3,577,921 - 1,791 3,576,130 1,100,000 1,100,000 - 1,074 1,098,926 11,952,217 11,952,217 5,000,000 2,865 6,949,352 - $ - $ (5,000,000) $ 196,947 $ 4,803,053 105 This page left blank intentionally. STATISTICAL SECTION This part of the City's comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City's overall financial health. Contents Page Financial Trends 108 These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial performance and well -being have changed over time. Revenue Capacity 116 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City's most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity 120 These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information 125 These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place. Operating Information 127 These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City's financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year. 107 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NET POSITION BY COMPONENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) 108 Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets $ 34,320,784 $ 36,092,020 $ 69,814,012 $ 67,680,882 Restricted 2,145,488 78,943 - - Unrestricted 28,762,040 35,796,801 15,280,058 25,136,312 Total governmental activities net position $ 65,228,312 $ 71,967,764 $ 85,094,070 $ 92,817,194 Business -type activities Net investment in capital assets $ 37,240,476 $ 40,044,169 $ 46,981,755 $ 43,046,160 Restricted - - - - Unrestricted 11,934,496 11,121,720 6,379,515 13,649,355 Total business -type activities net position $ 49,174,972 $ 51,165,889 $ 53,361,270 $ 56,695,515 Primary government Net investment in capital assets $ 71,561,260 $ 76,136,189 $ 116,795,767 $ 110,727,042 Restricted 2,145,488 78,943 - - Unrestricted 40,696,536 46,918,521 21,659,573 38,785,667 Total primary government net position $ 114,403,284 $ 123,133,653 $ 138,455,340 $ 149,512,709 a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. 108 109 Fiscal Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013a $ 71,601,227 $ 69,622,370 $ 69,783,162 $ 75,045,018 $ 78,644,392 $ 83,842,970 3,362,446 7,132,865 9,952,443 22,915,776 23,215,910 20,289,579 29,577,462 30,705,600 41,709,528 29,544,149 29,587,700 33,242,317 $ 104,541,135 $ 107,460,835 $ 121,445,133 $ 127,504,943 $ 131,448,002 $ 137,374,866 $ 46,851,736 $ 47,333,794 $ 48,807,806 $ 56,877,100 $ 63,766,144 $ 66,126,387 954,486 624,837 618,852 623,099 876,909 611,377 12,071,776 15,158,720 17,041,122 12,926,674 14,390,609 16,867,459 $ 59,877,998 $ 63,117,351 $ 66,467,780 $ 70,426,873 $ 79,033,662 $ 83,605,223 $ 118,452,963 $ 116,956,164 $ 118,590,968 $ 131,922,118 $ 142,410,536 $ 149,969,357 4,316,932 7,757,702 10,571,295 23,538,875 24,092,819 20,900,956 41,649,238 45,864,320 58,750,650 42,470,823 43,978,309 50,109,776 $ 164,419,133 $ 170,578,186 $ 187,912,913 $ 197,931,816 $ 210,481,664 $ 220,980,089 109 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET POSITION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (accrual basis of accounting) Expenses Governmental activities: General government Public safety Public works Parks Interest on long -term debt Total governmental activities expenses Business -type activities: Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf course Arena Community activity centers Total business -type activities expenses Total primary government expenses Program Revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: General government Public safety Other activities Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total governmental activities program revenues Business -type activities: Charges for services: Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf course Arena Community activity centers Operating grants and contributions Total business -type activities program revenues Total primary government program revenues Net Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government net expense General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental activities: Property taxes Tax increment collections Franchise taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain on disposal of capital assets Insurance recovery Transfers Total governmental activities Business -type activities: Property taxes Unrestricted investment earnings Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets Transfers Total business -type activities Total primary government Change in Net Position Governmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 $ 6,934,045 11,063,767 5,834,490 4,248,060 2,399,682 30,480,044 7,801,580 9,110,888 701,768 3,508,741 1,492,461 2,357,731 24,973,169 $ 55,453,213 $ 454,603 4,634,744 748,398 1,154,808 4,192,947 11,185,500 9,875,078 10,030,067 764,134 3,538,122 1,319,987 1,934,025 138,447 27,599,860 $ 38,785,360 $ (19,294,544) 2,626,691 $ (16,667,853) $ 4,967,008 12,019,027 7,185,784 5,901,648 2,288,524 32,361,991 8,254,409 9,749,313 725,936 3,580,307 1,497,431 2,328,131 26,135,527 $ 58,497,518 $ 619,526 5,614,406 630,157 1,512,366 2,252,491 10,628,946 10,240,381 10,752,724 849,380 3,482,999 1,376,607 1,875,253 131,408 28,708,752 $ 39,337,698 $ (21,733,045) 2,573,225 $ (19,159,820) $ 5,414,961 13,300,351 8,973,031 5,341,682 2,973,749 36,003,774 9,234,651 9,968,963 795,614 3,652,169 1,542,098 2,506,551 27,700,046 $ 63,703,820 $ 731,613 6,146,114 793,796 1,423,302 4,013,617 13,108,442 11,421,474 11,029,445 867,626 3,646,620 1,418,555 1,918,598 122,358 30,424,676 $ 43,533,118 $ (22,895,332) 2,724,630 $ (20,170,702) $ 7,039,298 13,743,194 8,757,022 5,025,560 1,887,633 36,452,707 10,036,844 10,361,998 780,981 3,621,977 1,538,407 2,630,127 28,970,334 $ 65,423,041 $ 784,659 5,632,642 736,329 1,384,024 4,299,509 12,837,163 13,125, 773 11,436,175 868,833 3,630,538 1,414,173 2,102,938 127,492 32,705,922 $ 45,543,085 $ (23,615,544) 3,735,588 $ (19,879,956) $ 17,865,757 $ 19,071,202 $ 20,414,298 $ 21,459,001 6,761,934 7,060,744 7,228,002 7,793,577 450,956 457,421 499,206 570,871 443,074 977,956 1,230,264 1,581,702 - 63,674 8,418 58,377 655,227 841,500 838,230 919,625 26,176,948 28,472,497 30,218,418 32,383,153 227,167 6,490 655,227 (421,570) $ 25,755,378 $ 6,882,404 2,205,121 $ 9,087,525 236,654 22,538 841,500 (582,308) $ 27,890,189 $ 6,739,452 1,990,917 $ 8,730,369 a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle. 110 283,771 25,210 838,230 (529,249) $ 29,689,169 510,678 7,604 (919,625 (401,343) $ 31,981,810 $ 7,323,086 $ 8,767,609 2,195,381 3,334,245 $ 9,518,467 $ 12,101,854 ME Fiscal Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20138 $ 6;836,248 $ 7,362,560 $ 6,961,082 $ 7,013,231 $ 12,598,979 $ 8,256,261 14,833,647 14;751,479 15, 543,594 16,024,575 16,598,423 17,117,693 9,046,873 8;993,290 8,558,363 9,193,336 9,437,285 11,502,250 5,971,565 7,732,777 5,608,758 5,540,585 5,904,724 6,132,709 1,923,821 2,129,490 2,528,424 2,339,370 2,222,392 2,024,749 38,612,154 40,969,596 39,200,221 40,111,097 46,761,803 45,033,662 10,625,811 11,833,994 11,848, 538 12,130,685 12,610,875 13,748,186 11,049,223 11,449,194 11,594,643 11,727;106 11,7401744 12,261,413 787,663 7,98,369 769,608 718,027 866,944 822,932 3,612,482 3,588,831 3,561,573 3,390,949 3,293,192 3,199,815 1,689,660 1,665,082 1,527,536 1,689,001 2,182,206 2,272,510 2,813,189 2,971,293 2,965,243 2,998,915 2,842,139 2,967,115 .,. 30,578,028 32,306,763 32,267,141 32,654,683 33,536,094 35,271;971 $ 69,190,182 $ 73,276,359 $ 71,467,362 $ 72,765,780 $ 80,297,897 $ 80,305;633 , $ 840,070 $ 811,087 $ 946,107 $ 969,745 $ 1,142,984 $ 1,259,908 5,839,683 5,081,563 5,448,505 5,988,485 6,549,929 7,410,755 763,130 804,500 723,559 775,676 913,864 846,999 1,170;183 1,377,785 1,162,411 1,392,892 1,685,026 2,283,007 7,710,015 2,582,999 13,325,431 5,770,912 9,137,011 6,372,735 16,323,081 10,657,934 21,606,013 14,897,710 19,428,814 18,173,404 13,713,249. 14,858,488 15,036,016 15,873,937 17,729,589 17,831,225 _ 12,122,599 12,655,777 12,857,064 13,172,484 13,230,941 13,711,557 925,388 859,816 945,529 913,383 1,001,946 928;055 3,680,584 3,660,466 3,443,204 3,285,741 3,225,591 2,711,743 1,399,599 1,414,410 1,301, 506 1,315,435 1,452,435 1,942,971 2,117,619 2,192,274 2,194,476 2,331,136 2,399,090 2,625,633 147,456 - 135,917 373,230 135,428 1,042,195 516,242 34,106,494 35;777,148 36,151,025 37,027,544 40,081,787 40,267,426 $ 50,429,575 $ 46,435,082 $ 57,757,038 $ 51,925,254 $ 59,510,601 $ 58,440,830 $ (22,289,073) $ (30,311,662) $ (17,594,208) $ (25,213,387) $ (27,332;989) $ (26,860,258) 3,528,466 3,470,385 3,883,884 4,372;861 6,545,693 4,995,455 $ (18,760,607) $ (26,841,277) $ (13,710,324) $ (20,840,526) $ (20,787,296) $ (21,664,803) $ 22,242,276 $ 23,834,274 $ 25,122,113 $ 25,040,871 $ 25,884,662 $ 26,894,161 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073 4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 647,466 667,791 692,268 722,160 815,530 1,891,967 1,185,899 387,177 474;444 601,250 341,986 (96,390) 1,265 11,709 35,594 131,365 - 16,654 - - - 816,654 967,800. 743,025 765,994 694,206 696,935 133,907 33,623,140 33,231,362 31,578,506 31,273,197 31,276,048 33,638,891 $ - $ 300,372 $ - $ - $ - $ 607,312 209,371 205,965 280,438 113,177 (77,848) 14,505 2,250 26,574 - 2,644,854 17,587 (967,800) (743,025) (765,994) (694,206) (696,935) (133,907) (345,983) (231,032) (533,455) (413,768) 2,061,096 (194,168) $ 33,277,157 $ 33,000,330 $ 31,045,051 $ 30,859,429 $ 33,337,144 $ 33,444,723 $ 11,334,667 $ 2,919,700 $ 13,984,298 $ 6,059,810 $ 3,943,059 $ 6,778,633 3,182,483 3,239,353 3,350,429 3,959,093 8,606,789 4,801,287 $ 14,516,550 $ 6,159,053 $ 17,334,727 $ 10,018,903 $ 12,549,848 $ 11,579,920 ME CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FUND:BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST,-,TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) All other governmental funds Reserved $ 3,465,440 $ 13,792,312 $ 2,682,238 $ 6,247,539 Unreserved,. reported in: Special revenue funds 781,458 731,027 13,179,904 14,750,448 Capital projects funds 16,651,788 17,032,750 3,160,085 5,853,322 Restricted, reported in: Special revenue funds - - - Debt service funds - - - Construction funds - - - - Assigned, reported in: Capital projects funds - - - - Total all other governmental funds $ 20,898,686 $ 31,556,089 $ 19,022,227 $ 26,851,309 a The substantial increase in reserved fund balance in 2005 is due to two crossover refunding bond issues that were outstanding as of December 31, 2005. The substantial decrease in general fund unreserved fund balance in 2009 is due to the transfer of the equipment replacement program to the construction fund. The substantial increase in other governmental funds'reserved fund balance in 2009. is due to unspent bond proceeds related to the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction. ° The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively. 112 Fiscal Year - 2004 2005a 2006 2007:: -� General fund Reserved $ 390,77:1 $ 223,351 $ 36,849 $ 28,637 Unreserved 10,226,055 11,595,433 13,797,189 14,078,220 Nonspendable - - - - Restricted - - - - Assigned - - - - '" Unassigned - - - - Total general fund $ 10,616,826 $ 11,818,784 $ 13,834,038 $ 14,106,857 All other governmental funds Reserved $ 3,465,440 $ 13,792,312 $ 2,682,238 $ 6,247,539 Unreserved,. reported in: Special revenue funds 781,458 731,027 13,179,904 14,750,448 Capital projects funds 16,651,788 17,032,750 3,160,085 5,853,322 Restricted, reported in: Special revenue funds - - - Debt service funds - - - Construction funds - - - - Assigned, reported in: Capital projects funds - - - - Total all other governmental funds $ 20,898,686 $ 31,556,089 $ 19,022,227 $ 26,851,309 a The substantial increase in reserved fund balance in 2005 is due to two crossover refunding bond issues that were outstanding as of December 31, 2005. The substantial decrease in general fund unreserved fund balance in 2009 is due to the transfer of the equipment replacement program to the construction fund. The substantial increase in other governmental funds'reserved fund balance in 2009. is due to unspent bond proceeds related to the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction. ° The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions" in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively. 112 Fiscal Year 2008 2009b 2010 2011° 2012 2013 $ 13,982 $ 18,241 $ 10,258 $ - $ - $ - 14,365,021 12,031,358 12,868,952 - - - - - - 10,871 413,200 13,322 - - 178,295 880,395 185,395 - - 1,539,286 1,643,077 1,559,461 - - - 11,744,764 11,902,462 12,573,457 $ 14,379,003 $ 12,049,599 $ 12,879,210 $ 13,473,216 $ 14,839,134 $ 14,331,635 $ 8,467,918 $ 15,223,353 $ 9,460,834 $ - $ - $ - 14,950,538 12,813,439 15,333,460 - - - 4,270,440 6,683,668 12,150,968 - - - - - - 17,178,857 13,185,962 13,040,516 - - 8,068,183 9,704,408 6,246,769 - 2,087,548 2,759,463 3,318,947 - - - 8,098,935 7,159,890 8,354,268 $ 27,688,896 $ 34,720,460 $ 36,945,262 $ 35,433,523 $ 32,809,723 $ 30,960,500 113 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (modified accrual basis of accounting) Revenues General property taxes Tax increment collections Special assessments Franchise fees License and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment income Rental of property Parkland dedication Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures General government Public safety Public works Parks Capital outlay Debt service Principal Interest and other charges Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in Transfers out Sale of capital assets Insurance recovery Bonds issued Premium on bonds issued Discount on bonds issued Refunding bonds issued Payment to refunding escrow Principal paid by escrow Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 2007a $ 17,865,757 $ 19,071,202 $ 20,414,298 $ 21,459,001 6,761,934 7,060,744 7,228,002 7,793,577 966,879 1,354,264 1,751,219 1,750,444 450,956 457,421 499,206 570,871 2,247,759 3,240,622 3,488,897 2,909,521 3,933,540 1,539,169 2,773,350 3,699,006 2,279,302 2,466,663 2,691,354 2,748,709 863,073 742,917 1,023,935 971,486 443,074 977,956 1,230,264 1,581,702 385,707 315,542 310,145 355,734 294,136 227,446 246,797 225,839 36,492,117 37,453,946 41,657,467 44,065,890 5,213,469 5,477,308 5,995,804 6,544,307 11,125,388 11,373,763 12,431,114 12,985,215 4,386,669 4,882,811 5,233,907 5,787,619 2,954,372 3,146,029 3,300,375 3,455,789 7,772,321 8,227,191 8,980,526 11,991,122 6,450,000 6,830,000 5,985,000 6,190,000 2,484,291 2,543,639 2,107,036 1,677,770 40,386,510 42,480,741 44,033,762 48,631,822 (3,894,393) (5,026,795) (2,376,295) (4,565,932) 8,367,595 7,797,369 6,865,258 7,290,391 (7,712,368) (6,955,869) (6,027,028) (6,370,766) - 135,045 54,457 66,845 15,816,165 (36,275) 16,764,721 (16,635,000) 655,227 16,886,156 11,735,000 (53,637) (9,035,000) - (8,142,313) 12,667,833 $ (3,239,166) $ 11,859,361 $ (10,518,608) $ 8,101,901 27.4% 27.4% 23.1% 21.5% a The substantial change in debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures in 2007 is due to a change in the way this ratio is calculated. The City did not recalculate previously reported ratios. 114 Fiscal Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 $ 22,242,276 $ 23,834,274 $ 25,122,113 $ 24,972,166 $ 25,838,422 $ 26,891,756 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073 4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 2,442,490 2,703,833 6,746,186 4,502,112 4,975,641 4,884,510 647,466 667,791 692,288 722,160 815,530 1,891,967 2,915,455 2,104,967 2,410,314 2,724,763 3,155,351 4,150,512 3,005,883 1,507,170 3,726,849 3,059,964 2,032,966 2,509,166 3,093,941 2,905,410 3,014,894 3,181,961 3,708,482 3,667,612 1,073,174 1,224,983 1,203, 767 1,243,426 1,195,054 1,109,710 1,185,899 387,177 474,444 601,250 341,986 (96,390) 255,607 343,616 426,517 539,091 506,276 518,862 - - - - 702,100 - 126,723 160,035 413,400 156,231 240,841 278,607 45,567,348 43,426,642 48,718,845 45,786,469 47,049,584 49,788,250 6,235,352 6,895,329 6,523,398 5,739,481 6,624,573 7,351,556 13,788,797 13,692,686 14,177,387 14,668,772 14,985,068 15,859,622 6,189,594 5,911,758 5,898,023 6,000,539 6,277,506 7,018,614 3,693,595 3,688,063 3,524,950 3,633,922 3,852,260 3,915,568 14,666,907 22,997,065 13,505,827 14,235,496 13,622,443 10,690,207 7,090,000 7,415,000 2,975,000 4,480,000 6,620,000 14,531,375 1,967,021 1,841,342 2,584,006 2,278,068 2,292,394 2,270,259 53,631,266 62,441,243 49,188,591 51,036,278 54,274,244 61,637,201 (8,063,918) (19,014,601) (469,746) (5,249,809) (7,224,660) (11,848,951) 7,983,585 11,347,773 2,903,762 5,615,669 4,495,940 3,472,964 (7,015,785) (10,604,748) (2,137,768) (4,921,463) (3,799,005) (3,339,057) 96,825 34,592 134,329 209,773 94,975 61,642 - - - - - 816,654 7,755,000 22,950,000 2,535,000 3,320,000 2,748,720 2,555,000 - 64,765 898,658 108,097 436,148 275,360 (35,848) (75,621) - - - (60,334) - - 8,285,000 - 1,990,000 5,710,000 - - (9,094,822) - - - 8,783,777 23,716,761 3,524,159 4,332,076 5,966,778 9,492,229 $ 719,859 $ 4,702,160 $ 3,054,413 $ (917,733) $ (1,257,882) $ (2,356,722) 22.6% 21.7% 15.4% 17.8% 19.4% 32.2% 115 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 2004 estimated market values obtained from previous CAFRs and do not include personal property. DNA: Historical data is not available a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate "). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. 116 Market Value (In Thousands) a Tax Capacity (In Thousands) City Tax City Estimated Fiscal Used Adjusted Capacity Referendum Direct Year Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate Rate b 2004 $6,909,477 DNA DNA $ 83,448 $ 68,553 $ 70,756 25.565% 0.01000% $2.618 2005 8,052,704 $7,674,983 $7,668,117 91,310 76,343 78,717 24.085% 0.00880% 2.354 2006 8,713,166 8,541,954 8,536,086 101,948 86,860 89,272 22.613% 0.00703% 2.317 2007 9,619,356 9,456,650 9,451,668 113,429 96,170 98,765 21.150% 0.00641% 2.172 2008 9,986,738 9,933,166 9,928,907 120,084 100,954 103,850 21.197% 0.00601% 2.204 2009 10,112,498 10,091,005 10,079,499 122,532 101,831 105,130 22.447% 0.00597% 2.334 2010 9,960,341 9,960,341 9,949,807 120,817 104,914 108,452 22.972% 0.00606% 2.501 2011 9,441,688 9,441,688 9,431,941 113,981 98,897 102,319 24.660% 0.00654% 2.672 2012 9,179,305 9,179,305 9,025,565 109,013 94,811 97,879 26.247% 0.00667% 2.799 2013 8,955,431 8,955,431 8,798,601 106,530 93,504 96,120 27.216% 0.00690% 2.921 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 2004 estimated market values obtained from previous CAFRs and do not include personal property. DNA: Historical data is not available a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification. b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity (see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate "). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only. 116 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS City Rates Overlapping Rates Total Fiscal Basic Debt Total Tax ISD #273 Edina Direct & Year Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV Other Overlap 2004 23.183% 2.382% 25.565% 0.010% 47.324% 22.670% DNA 8.256% 103.815% 2005 22.536% 1.549% 24.085% 0.009% 44.172% 19.694% 0.166% 8.547% 96.498% 2006 20.755% 1.858% 22.613% 0.007% 41.016% 19.226% 0.154% 8.104% 90.959% 2007 19.636% 1.514% 21.150% 0.006% 39.110% 18.244% 0.147% 8.417% 86.921% 2008 19.563% 1.634% 21.197% 0.006% 38.571% 16.951% 0.177% 8.546% 85.265% 2009 20.204% 2.243% 22.447% 0.006% 40.413% 17.766% 0.183% 8.413% 89.039% 2010 20.004% 2.968% 22.972% 0.006% 42.640% 18.746% 0.194% 9.431% 93.789% 2011 21.548% 3.112% 24.660% 0.007% 45.840% 21.786% 0.196% 10.489% 102.775% 2012 23.131% 3.116% 26.247% 0.007% 48.231% 27.565% 0.215% 10.911% 112.954% 2013 23.762% 3.454% 27.216% 0.007% 49.461% 27.762% 0.217% 11.483% 115.922% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. Some 2003 -2004 data obtained from previous CAFR's. RMV: Referendum Market Value DNA: Historical data is not available Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit, Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City, Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates. 117 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Totals $ 8,595,621 8.07% $ 7,651,619 9.17% Source: City of Edina Assessing Office 118 2013 2004 Percentage Percentage of Total of Total Taxpayer Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Southdale Shopping Center $ 2,506,810 1 2.35% $ 3,154,408 1 3.78% Galleria Shopping Center 1,593,450 2 1.50% 949,864 2 1.14% Centennial Lakes Retail 715,026 3 0.67% - 0.00% Southdale Office Park 701,274 4 0.66% 717,250 3 0.86% Southdale Medical Building 620,285 5 0.58% 428,608 7 0.51% Centennial Lakes Phase V 580,176 6 0.54% 509,625 4 0.61% Centennial Lakes Phase IV 568,936 7 0.53% 496,474 5 0.59% National Car 508,794 8 0.48% - 0.00% Target 439,250 9 0.41% - 0.00% Hellmuth & Johnson 361,620 10 0.34% - 0.00% May Department Stores - 0.00% 343,044 8 0.41% 7700 France - 0.00% 450,214 6 0.54% Centennial Lakes Phase II - 0.00% 301,066 9 0.36% Centennial Lakes Phase III - 0.00% 301,066 10 0.36% Totals $ 8,595,621 8.07% $ 7,651,619 9.17% Source: City of Edina Assessing Office 118 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Total Taxes Tax Payable Levy Collected within the Fiscal Year of the Levy Collections in Percentage Subsequent Amount of Levy Years Total Collections to Date Amount Percentage of Levy 2004 $ 18,808,903 $ 18,066,892 96.06% $ 22,734 $ 18,089,626 96.18% 2005 19,667,551 19,090,016 97.06% 82,177 19,172,193 97.48% 2006 20,820,130 20,310,889 97.55% 66,489 20,377,378 97.87% 2007 21,530,528 21,347,789 a 99.15% a 65,836 21,413,625 99.46% 2008 22,605,669 22,178,719 b 98.11% b 174,769 22,353,488 98.88% 2009 24,153,933 23,484,137 ° 97.23% ° 57,006 23,541,143 97.46% 2010 25,492,973 24,904,346 97.69% (300,821) 24,603,525 96.51% 2011 25,786,217 25,067,625 97.21% (65,175) 25,002,450 96.96% 2012 26,248,226 25,983,685 98.99% 76,237 26,059,922 99.28% 2013 26,747,384 26,545,984 99.25% - 26,545,984 99.25% Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. a In 2007 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for MVHC after five years of not making payments. b In 2008 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for only 50% of MVHC. In 2009 the State of Minnesota once again quit reimbursing the City for MVHC. 119 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands, except per capita) Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. All figures are presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments if applicable. 120 Total Percentage Primary of Personal Government Income $ 60,488 68,094 51,566 63,786 76,257 91,380 89,011 96,693 101,908 92,788 2.57% 2.91% 2.18% 2.39% 2.99% 3.54% 3.39% 3.66% 3.71% 2.93% Per Capita $ 1,256 1,435 1,100 1,355 1,583 1,897 1,857 2,004 2,087 1,900 Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities General Public Tax Permanent EEEP Rec. utility Obligation Project Increment Improvement Revenue Facility Revenue Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds Bonds Bonds $ 7,265 $ 11,428 $ 30,663 $ - $ - $ 6,295 $ 4,837 11,786 16,381 28,828 1,452 - 5,450 4,197 5,687 15,913 20,402 1,453 - 4,577 3,534 10,963 15,235 15,628 7,152 - 3,675 11,133 10,393 14,531 10,000 14,719 - 2,835 23,779 24,057 22,442 4,115 14,574 - 4,479 21,713 32,595 13,282 3,314 16,254 - 4,059 19,507 30,417 13,077 2,477 18,353 - 3,569 28,800 28,318 11,787 550 22,067 74 5,952 33,160 32,035 5,627 - 18,889 62 6,540 29,635 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. All figures are presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments if applicable. 120 Total Percentage Primary of Personal Government Income $ 60,488 68,094 51,566 63,786 76,257 91,380 89,011 96,693 101,908 92,788 2.57% 2.91% 2.18% 2.39% 2.99% 3.54% 3.39% 3.66% 3.71% 2.93% Per Capita $ 1,256 1,435 1,100 1,355 1,583 1,897 1,857 2,004 2,087 1,900 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands, except per capita) Fiscal Percentage of Year General Obligation Debt a Property Value b Per Capita 2004 $ 7,265 0.11% $ 151 2005 11,786 0.15% 248 2006 5,687 0.07% 121 2007 10,963 0.11% 233 2008 10,393 0.10% 216 2009 24,057 0.24% 499 2010 32,595 0.33% 680 2011 30,417 0.32% 630 2012 28,318 0.31% 580 2013 32,035 0.36% 656 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements. a Presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments. b See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for estimated property value data. 121 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 Net General Percentage Obligation Bonded Applicable Debt Outstanding in City Overlapping Debt: City Share of Debt Hennepin County $ 723,264,582 7.59% $ 54,895,782 Hennepin Suburban Park District 54,166,123 10.31% 5,584,527 Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 37,350,216 10.31% 3,850,807 School Districts: ISD No. 273 (Edina) 62,133,856 98.43% 61,158,354 ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 169,181,538 8.30% 14,042,068 ISD No. 271 (Bloomington) 23,073,790 0.01% 2,307 ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 62,244,819 1.00% 622,448 ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 21,621,293 22.48% 4,860,467 ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 39,643,656 0.02% 7,929 Metro Council Total Overlapping Debt Direct Debt: City of Edina Total Overlapping and Direct Debt Debt Ratios: Ratio of debt per capita (48,829 population) 158,664,771 1,351,344,644 56,613,468 $ 1,407,958,112 Ratio of debt to estimated market valuation of $8,955,431,000 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services 3.47% 5,505,668 150,530,357 100.00% 56,613,468 $ 207,143,825 $ 4,242 a The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity. 122 2.31% CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (dollars in thousands) Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008a 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Debt limit $ 160,674 $ 173,867 $ 191,974 $ 199,775 $ 302,385 $ 301,369 $ 298,494 $ 282,958 $ 270,767 $ 263,958 Total net debt applicable to limit 18,890 29,785 21,750 26,380 25,095 46,670 45,170 42,860 39,545 37,030 Legal debt margin $ 141,784 $ 144,082 $ 170,224 $ 173,395 $ 277,290 $ 254,699 $ 253,324 $ 240,098 $ 231,222 $ 226,928 Total net debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt limit 11.76% 17.13% 11.33% 13.20% 8.30% 15.49% 15.13% 15.15% 14.60% 14.03% Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2013 Market value (after fiscal disparities) Debt limit (3% of market value) Debt applicable to limit: General obligation bonds Public project revenue bonds Total debt applicable to limit Legal debt margin $ 8,798,600,609 263,958,018 31,390,000 5,640,000 37,030,000 $ 226,928,018 a The State of Minnesota changed the legal debt limit from 2% of taxable market value to 3% during 2008. 123 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Less: operating Net available Debt service requirements Year Revenue expenses revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue) 2005 7,060,744 2004 $ 1,028,837 $ - $ 1,028,837 $ 440,000 $ 557,636 $ 997,636 1.03 2005 1,058,840 - 1,058,840 460,000 558,486 1,018,486 1.04 2006 1,501,741 - 1,501,741 480,000 779,778 1,259,778 1.19 2007 1,497,500 - 1,497,500 690,000 725,855 1,415,855 1.06 2008 1,425,186 - 1,425,186 715,000 696,118 1,411,118 1.01 2009 1,424,405 - 1,424,405 745,000 665,193 1,410,193 1.01 2010 1,421,354 - 1,421,354 9,280,000 901,535 10,181,535 0.14 2011 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 210,000 574,681 784,681 1.72 2012 1,362,444 - 1,362,444 1,295,000 548,691 1,843,691 0.74 2013 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 6,225,000 589,734 6,814,734 0.20 Tax Increment Bonds 2004 6,761,934 6,761,934 5,140,000 1,520,376 6,660,376 1.02 2005 7,060,744 7,060,744 5,465,000 1,327,983 6,792,983 1.04 2006 7,228,002 7,228,002 8,445,000 902,607 9,347,607 0.77 2007 7,793,577 7,793,577 4,795,000 625,606 5,420,606 1.44 2008 8,578,434 8,578,434 5,650,000 445,694 6,095,694 1.41 2009 7,587,386 7,587,386 5,890,000 244,236 6,134,236 1.24 2010 4,488,073 4,488,073 805,000 125,820 930,820 4.82 2011 4,083,345 4,083,345 840,000 94,359 934,359 4.37 2012 3,536,935 3,536,935 1,930,000 48,445 1,978,445 1.79 2013 3,981,939 3,981,939 550,000 9,350 559,350 7.12 Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Special Assessment) 2006 85,656 85,656 - 43,366 43,366 1.98 2007 391,921 391,921 160,000 46,694 206,694 1.90 2008 564,534 564,534 155,000 306,759 461,759 1.22 2009 1,508,662 1,508,662 150,000 513,708 663,708 2.27 2010 1,339,350 1,339,350 655,000 520,278 1,175,278 1.14 2011 2,466,395 2,466,395 1,330,000 524,964 1,854,964 1.33 2012 2,520,862 2,520,862 1,375,000 557,514 1,932,514 1.30 2013 2,837,227 2,837,227 5,745,000 567,551 6,312,551 0.45 Utility Bond 2004 9,473,355 7,643,129 1,830,226 635,000 158,451 793,451 2.31 2005 10,225,975 8,107,039 2,118,936 645,000 141,226 786,226 2.70 2006 11,416,361 9,107,143 2,309,218 665,000 129,608 794,608 2.91 2007 13,125,419 9,735,839 3,389,580 690,000 108,840 798,840 4.24 2008 13,544,728 10,076,422 3,468,306 1,485,000 459,983 1,944,983 1.78 2009 14,857,798 10,815,216 4,042,582 2,045,000 803,157 2,848,157 1.42 2010 15,034,881 11,119,053 3,915,828 2,185,000 768,160 2,953,160 1.33 2011 15,871,102 11,438,288 4,432,814 2,270,000 693,285 2,963,285 1.50 2012 17,723,103 11,811,468 5,911,635 2,360,000 811,990 3,171,990 1.86 2013 17,830,425 12,893,159 4,937,266 3,400,000 933,970 4,333,970 1.14 Recreational Facility Bonds 2004 5,621,743 5,492,510 129,233 820,000 241,387 1,061,387 0.12 2005 5,708,827 5,604,464 104,363 850,000 214,108 1,064,108 0.10 2006 5,929,984 5,808,902 121,082 880,000 199,260 1,079,260 0.11 2007 5,870,485 5,798,005 72,480 905,000 168,159 1,073,159 0.07 2008 6,005,571 5,972,558 33,013 845,000 135,956 980,956 0.03 2009 5,932,900 5,977,793 (44,893) 860,000 92,128 952,128 (0.05) 2010 5,690,239 5,822,861 (132,622) 415,000 100,926 515,926 (0.26) 2011 5,510,043 5,760,947 (250,904) 485,000 115,050 600,050 (0.42) 2012 5,679,972 6,240,222 (560,250) 520,000 105,000 625,000 (0.90) 2013 5,582,769 6,118,195 (535,426) 550,000 138,127 688,127 (0.78) 124 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS Last Ten Fiscal Years Estimated Personal Fiscal Income Year Population (In thousands) Per Capita High School Personal Graduation Unemployment Income Rate Rate 2004 48,156 $ 2,356,369 $ 48,932 93.3% 3.90% 2005 47,448 2,341,464 49,348 92.1% 3.30% 2006 46,896 2,365,434 50,440 92.0% 3.00% 2007 47,090 2,673,959 56,784 92.0% 3.45% 2008 48,169 2,547,369 52,884 92.0% 4.33% 2009 48,169 2,582,436 53,612 92.4% 6.38% 2010 47,941 2,622,564 54,704 91.6% 5.56% 2011 48,262 2,640,124 54,704 92.2% 5.25% 2012 48,829 2,749,854 56,316 97.4% 4.56% 2013 48,829 3,168,807 64,896 97.7% 3.98% Sources: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau /Metropolitan Council. 2012 is the most recent. Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2012 is the most recent. High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County. Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 125 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Employer Employees Fairview Southdale Hospital 2,613 Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,693 BI Worldwide 1,000 City of Edina 735 Regis Corporation 600 International Dairy Queen Inc. 490 Barr Engineering 445 Edina Realty 400 FilmTec Corporation 400 Lund Food Holdings, Inc 397 Macy's (Marshall Field's or Dayton's) - Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. - Con Agra Foods - JC Penny Co. - Nash Finch Co. - Totals 8,773 2013 2004 Percentage of Percentage of Total City Total City Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment 1 11.38% 2,500 2 11.05% 2 7.37% 1,172 4 5.18% 3 4.35% DNA DNA DNA 4 3.20% 262 7 1.16% 5 2.61% DNA DNA DNA 6 2.13% 300 6 1.33% 7 1.94% DNA DNA DNA 8 1.74% 210 9 0.93% 9 1.74% DNA DNA DNA 10 1.73% DNA DNA DNA 0.00% 1,200 3 5.30% 0.00% 4,500 1 19.89% 0.00% 196 10 0.87% 0.00% 250 8 1.11% 0.00% 350 5 1.55% 38.19% 10,940 48.36% Sources: 2013 data from Infogroup (www.salesgenie.com), written and telephone survey (August 2013) done by Ehlers, and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 2004 data from previous CAFR. DNA: Historical data is not available 126 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FULL -TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Budgeted Full -time Employees for Fiscal Year a Function 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013b General Government Administration 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 7.85 7.85 Communications - - - - - - - - 4.65 4.65 Planning 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 Finance 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 Elections 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assessing 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Public Works Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Engineering 7.50 7.50 7.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 10.50 10.50 Supervision 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.30 2.30 2.30 Maintenance 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 27.00 27.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 Public Safety Police Protection 66.00 69.00 69.00 70.00 70.00 71.00 70.00 67.50 68.00 68.00 Animal Control 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Protection 32.00 32.00 32.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 Public Health 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 Inspections 6.50 6.50 6.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.75 10.75 Parks & Recreation Administration 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 Maintenance 16.50 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 16.40 Central Services General 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 City Hall 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 Public Works Bldg 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 Equipment Ops 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 Utilities 15.50 15.75 15.75 15.25 15.75 18.75 18.75 17.20 16.70 16.70 Liquor 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 9.75 Aquatic Center 0.20 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Golf Course 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 Arena 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Art Center 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Edinborough Park 7.00 7.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Centennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Other 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.50 - - Total 268.50 271.50 270.00 277.50 278.00 281.00 280.00 274.00 278.00 281.00 Source: City of Edina Finance Department a Employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. b The City completed a major departmental reorganization that is reflected on this chart between years 2012 -2013. In some cases, data for years before the reorganization has been modified from what was originally reported to improve comparisons. 127 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Function General Government Total City employees Votes cast a Public Works Asphalt placed (tons) Concrete (cu. yds.) Public Safety Crimes reported Fire calls Medical calls Central Services Vehicle fixes Utilities Daily consumption b Aquatic Center Attendance Golf Course Total rounds played Fiscal Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 870 909 887 890 918 885 869 892 989 1,040 31,730 1,367 26,270 7,930 31,512 2,733 25,463 7,957 31,841 3,480 - - 9,000 8,000 7,500 9,500 7,643 8,500 9,000 9,273 - - 650 850 480 640 503 558 667 560 1,983 1,908 1,937 2,010 2,025 1,985 1,890 1,590 1,628 NA 1,060 1,055 963 1,012 913 852 910 960 858 893 3,199 3,423 3,470 3,510 3,516 3,496 3,599 3,652 3,946 3,803 - - 2,398 2,460 2,967 2,539 2,431 2,331 2,546 3,493 - - 7,209 7,372 7,376 7,596 6,790 6,909 7,613 6,652 88,636 139,415 120,406 114,173 110,000 64,836 86,654 77,696 139,909 91,340 116,734 113,679 114,737 112,821 112,663 117,819 101,314 95,771 96,496 79,529 Source: Various City departments Note: The City prepared this schedule for the first time in 2006, therefore, some historical data is not readily available. NA: Data not available when this report was compiled. a The City Elections department runs general elections in even - numbered years and school district elections in odd - numbered years. Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd - numbered years and based on presidential election cycles. b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons. 128 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS 129 Fiscal Year Function 2004 2005. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012_ 2013 Public Works Miles of.streets 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 City parking ramps 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Public Safety Fire stations 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 .2 2 Parks & Recreation City parks 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Acreage of parks 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553, 1,553 1,553 Park buildings 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 ` Utilities Wells 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 18 18 18 Watermain miles 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 Sanitary. sewer miles 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 3. Sewer._ connections 14,851 14,851 14,851 14,851 14,851 13,933 13,933 13,933 13,979 13,979 Arena s'.. Ice sheets 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 129 �lNA, �? o e 888 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Nvv, ,Av.EdinaMN.gov 952- 826 -0366 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2013 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Purpose Audit Reports Year Ended December 31, 2013 Table of Contents Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance Page 1 -2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA MMKR Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA C E R T I F I E D PUBLIC James H. Eichten, CPA ACCOUNTANTS Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 9, 2014. INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. (continued) -1- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952- 545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of fmancial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota June 9, 2014 &a MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 9, 2014. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. WQ&07, Wax4 .., kaintiocu,11., � /4��Ga•naw,�, ' ea., P. A . Minneapolis, Minnesota June 9, 2014 -3- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Management Report for City of Edina, Minnesota December 31, 2013 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK IMMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota PRINCIPALS Thomas M. Montague, CPA Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Edina, Minnesota's (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013. The purpose of this report is to provide comments resulting from our audit process and to communicate information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. We have organized this report into the following sections: • Audit Summary • Governmental Funds Overview • Enterprise Funds Overview • Government -Wide Financial Statements • Legislative Updates • Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the fmancial reporting process comments resulting from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. W4&'7,, WeA , K ' &. J P. A . Minneapolis, Minnesota June 9, 2014 Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Telephone: 952 -545 -0424 • Telefax: 952 -545 -0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AUDIT SUMMARY The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged with governance of the City. OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013: • We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City's basic financial statements. • We reported no deficiencies in the City's internal control over financial reporting that we considered to be material weaknesses. • The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. • We reported no findings based on our testing of the City's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted, and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities, which identifies specific items previously presented as assets that will now be presented as either deferred outflows of resources or outflows (expenses /expenditures), and items previously reported as liabilities that will now be presented as deferred inflows of resources or inflows (revenues). This statement requires retroactive implementation. Accordingly, the cumulative effect of the accounting change decreased the governmental activities net position as of the beginning of the year by $851,769 and business -type activities by $229,726 in the Statement of Net Position. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. -1- ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were: • Depreciation — Management's estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. • Compensated Absences — Management's estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave balances. • Net Other Post - Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liabilities — Actuarial estimates of the net OPEB obligation is based on eligible participants, estimated future health insurance premiums, and estimated retirement dates. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these accounting estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable, were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 9, 2014. MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. -2- OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. OTHER MATTERS With respect to the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules accompanying the financial statements, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves. With respect to the introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section accompanying the financial statements, our procedures were limited to reading this other information, and in doing so we did not identify any material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. -3- GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's governmental funds, which includes the General Fund, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds. These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City's financial statements focuses on budgetary compliance, and the sufficiency of each governmental fund's current assets to fmance its current liabilities. PROPERTY TAXES Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities. In recent years this dependence has been heightened, as economic conditions have resulted in reductions to other revenue sources such as state aids and fees generated from property development or redevelopment. Despite these conditions, property taxes levied by Minnesota cities increased a record low 0.9 percent state -wide for 2012, and 2.27 percent for 2013. Almost one -third of Minnesota cities kept their 2013 levy at the same level as the previous year, while another 13 percent reduced their levies for 2013. Economic conditions have also had a profound effect on the tax base of Minnesota cities with state -wide taxable market values declining each of the last four levy years, including average decreases of 8.8 percent and 4.5 percent for taxes payable in 2012 and 2013, respectively. There is optimism that this trend is reversing, as the market value decline for the 2013 levy year was the smallest of the past four years. However, since the assessed valuation used for levying property taxes is based on values from the previous fiscal year (e.g. the market value for taxes payable in 2013 is based on estimated values as of January 1, 2012), taxable market value improvement has lagged behind recent upturns in the housing market and the economy in general. The City's taxable market value decreased 4.3 percent for taxes payable in 2012 and 2.5 percent for taxes payable in 2013, both of which were less severe than the state -wide average. The following graph shows the City's changes in taxable market value over the past 10 years: $10,500,000,000 $9,000,000,000 $7,500,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $4,500,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 Taxable Market Value 1111111111111011=111 I I M, ION! NONE ON 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 -4- Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state's property classification system to each property's market value. Each property classification, such as commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city's total tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the proportion of the City's tax base that is in each property classification from year -to -year, as well as legislative changes to tax rates. The City's tax capacity decreased 4.4 percent and 2.3 percent for taxes payable in 2012 and 2013, respectively. The following graph shows the City's change in tax capacities over the past 10 years: $130,000,000 $120,000,000 $110,000,000 $100,000,000 $90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 Local Tax Capacity 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last two levy years, along with comparative state -wide and metro area rates. The general increase in rates reflects both the increased reliance of local governments on property taxes and the recent decline in tax capacities. Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity All Cities Seven -County State -Wide Metro Area City of Edina 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Average tax rate City 46.3 48.8 43.4 46.1 26.3 27.2 County 46.8 48.5 45.0 47.1 48.2 49.5 School 27.3 28.5 28.5 30.3 27.8 28.2 Special taxing 6.8 7.2 8.7 9.4 11.0 11.6 Total 127.2 133.0 125.6 132.9 113.3 116.5 The City's portion of the tax capacity rates for its residents has historically been well below the state -wide and metro area averages. -5- GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City's governmental funds during the year ended December 31, 2013, presented both by fund balance classification and by fund: Governmental Funds Change in Fund Balance Fund balances of governmental funds Total by classification Nonspendable Restricted Assigned Unassigned Total — governmental funds Fund Balance as of December 31, Increase 2013 2012 (Decrease) $ 13,322 $ 413,200 $ (399,878) 22,791,627 26,530,228 (3,738,601) 9,913,729 8,802,967 1,110,762 12,573,457 11,902,462 670,995 $ 45,292,135 $ 47,648,857 $ (2,356,722) Total by fund General $ 14,331,635 $ 14,839,134 $ (507,499) Housing & Redevelopment Authority 11,495,641 12,196,146 (700,505) Debt Service 6,246,769 9,704,408 (3,457,639) Construction 10,856,561 9,919,353 937,208 Nonmajor funds 2,361,529 989,816 1,371,713 Total — governmental funds $ 45,292,135 $ 47,648,857 $ (2,356,722) In total, the fund balances of the City's governmental funds decreased by $2,356,722 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The significant decrease in the Debt Service Fund is due to the refunding of bonds for $3,710,000 issued in 2012 and paid in fiscal 2013. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City's governmental funds for the past three years, along with state -wide averages. We have included the most recent comparative state -wide averages available from the Office of the State Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City's data. The amounts received from the typical major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as the City's stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year -to -year due to the effect of inflation and changes in the City's operation. Also, certain data on these tables may be classified differently than how they appear on the City's financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state -wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures. We. have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of your city. We intend for this type of comparative and trend information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the Management's Discussion and Analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates. Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the previous table. Property tax revenue increased by $22 per capita, due to an increase in the amount levied and improved collections. Franchise taxes increased by $22 per capita due to the new gas and electric franchise fee collected in the current year. Licenses and permits increased by $20 per capita due to an increase in building permits for construction in the City. Other revenue declined $24 per capita due to the negative market adjustment on the City's investment portfolio in 2013 and parkland dedication revenue received in 2012. -7- State -Wide City of Edina Year December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 2011 2012 2013 Population 20,000 - 100,000 20,000- 100,000 47,941 48,829 48,829 Property taxes $ 406 416 $ 517 $ 529 $ 551 Tax increments 51 46 85 72 82 Franchise taxes 30 30 15 17 39 Special assessments 56 62 93 102 100 Licenses and permits 31 35 56 65 85 Intergovernmental revenues 152 138 63 42 51 Charges for services 78 83 66 76 75 Other 65 50 53 61 37 Total revenue $ 869 $ 860 $ 948 $ 964 $ 12020 The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the previous table. Property tax revenue increased by $22 per capita, due to an increase in the amount levied and improved collections. Franchise taxes increased by $22 per capita due to the new gas and electric franchise fee collected in the current year. Licenses and permits increased by $20 per capita due to an increase in building permits for construction in the City. Other revenue declined $24 per capita due to the negative market adjustment on the City's investment portfolio in 2013 and parkland dedication revenue received in 2012. -7- The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state -wide averages and from year -to -year, based on the City's circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows: • Current — These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues. Capital Outlay and Construction — These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more typically fluctuating significantly from year -to -year. Many of these expenditures are project- oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects. • Debt Service — Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt may be repaid with general property taxes. The City's expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with state -wide averages, are presented in the following table: The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state -wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's current operating costs are higher than average for public safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full -time fire department. Current expenditures increased $49 per capita mostly related to increased General Fund expenditures. Most of this increase was expected as the 2013 budgeted expenditures were $38 per capita higher than calendar 2012 expenditures. Debt service expenditures for 2013 were $161 per capita more than the prior year due to an increase in bond maturities and two debt refunding payments made during fiscal 2013. If you exclude these two bond refunding payments, the total debt service per capita is $151. -8- Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita With State -Wide Averages by Population Class State -Wide City of Edina Year December 31, 2011 December 31, 2012 2011 2012 2013 Population 20,000 - 100,000 20,000 - 100,000 47,941 48,829 48,829 Current General government $ 82 $ 84 $ 119 $ 136 $ 151 Public safety 238 241 304 307 325 Streets and highways 89 92 124 129 144 Parks and recreation 87 86 75 79 80 All other 82 92 — — — $ 578 $ 595 $ 622 $ 651 $ 700 Capital outlay and construction $ 233 $ 221 $ 295 $ 279 $ 219 Debt service Principal $ 109 $ 103 $ 93 $ 136 $ 298 Interest and fiscal charges 41 39 47 47 46 $ 150 $ 142 $ 140 $ 183 $ 344 The City's governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state -wide averages for cities in the same population class. The City's current operating costs are higher than average for public safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full -time fire department. Current expenditures increased $49 per capita mostly related to increased General Fund expenditures. Most of this increase was expected as the 2013 budgeted expenditures were $38 per capita higher than calendar 2012 expenditures. Debt service expenditures for 2013 were $161 per capita more than the prior year due to an increase in bond maturities and two debt refunding payments made during fiscal 2013. If you exclude these two bond refunding payments, the total debt service per capita is $151. -8- GENERAL FUND The City's General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operation, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last five years. We have also included a line representing annual expenditures and operating transfers out to reflect the change in the size of the General Fund operation over the same period. $36,000,000 $32,000,000 $28,000,000 $24,000,000 $20,000,000 $1 6,000,000 $12,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $4,000,000 General Fund Financial Position Year Ended December 31, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 D Fund Balance Cash Balance (Net of Interfund Borrowing) Expenditures The City's General Fund cash and investments balance (net of interfund borrowing) at December 31, 2013 was $15,923,685. Total fund balance at December 31, 2013 was $14,331,635, which is a decrease of $507,499 from the prior year, as compared to a budgeted decline in fund balance of $2,392,872. As the graph illustrates, the City has generally been able to maintain healthy cash and fund balance levels as the volume of fmancial activity has grown. This is an important factor because a government, like any organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. A healthy financial position allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and is a factor in determining the City's bond rating and resulting interest costs. A trend that is typical to Minnesota local governments, especially the General Fund of cities, is the unusual cash flow experienced throughout the year. The City's General Fund cash disbursements are made fairly evenly during the year other than the impact of seasonal services such as snowplowing, street maintenance, and park activities. Cash receipts of the General Fund are quite a different story. Taxes comprise about 66 percent of the fund's total annual revenue. Approximately half of these revenues are received by the City in July and the rest in December. Consequently, the City needs to have adequate cash reserves to finance its everyday operations between these payments. The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the General Fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned General Fund balance of 42 percent to 47 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. As of December 31, 2013, the City has $12,573,457 of unassigned fund balance in the General Fund, or 56.2 percent, of 2014 budgeted tax revenue. This amount is $2,049,968 above the goal range identified in the policy. The following chart reflects the City's General Fund revenue sources for 2013 compared to budget: General Fund Revenue Taxes Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Other sf, 000 000 000 000 e e e e e e e e off' off' off' off' �o, moo, moo, moo, moo, moo, �o, moo, ❑ Budget ❑ Actual General Fund revenue for 2013 was $33,317,062, which was $2,282,106 (7.4 percent) greater than budget. Licenses and permits revenue was over budget by $1,255,491 due to the unexpected increase in the number of projects during the year and an increase in the number of permits sold. Intergovernmental revenue was over budget by $474,425, primarily related to a State Auditor - recommended change to the recording of state fire relief aid. Charges for services were over budget by $287,093 due to an increase in the number of ambulance calls and other services provided to residents, in addition to the City providing dispatching duties to a nearby metro city. The following graph presents the City's General Fund revenues by source for the last five years. The graph reflects the City's reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue, and shows the virtual elimination of general state -aid revenue in recent years. $24,000,000 $22,000,000 $20,000,000 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 General Fund Revenue by Source Year Ended December 31, 2013 d es �.vVs d`ON `4�es o�efis Opel 64 - 0� � �a4 tiv °ewes �`e� G����s 4`oes ❑ 2009 ❑ 2010 112011 ❑ 2012 ❑ 2013 Total General Fund revenue for 2013 was $1,244,413 (3.9 percent) higher than last year. Property taxes increased $737,278 from the increased levy and increased collections. Licenses and permits increased $995,764. These increases were for reasons previously discussed in the paragraph above. Intergovernmental revenues increased $329,988 over the prior year. This is due to the state fire aid recommendation noted above. The decrease in other revenue of $665,245 is due to the parkland dedication revenue received in 2012. -10- The following graphs illustrate the components of General Fund spending for 2013 compared to budget: General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks General Fund Expenditures Budget and Actual oo° ocA ocA oc4� °cA 69 411 4� off' off' off' off' cQ °' cAo' cAo' cQo' ❑ Budget o Actual Total General Fund expenditures for 2013 were $32,196,789, which was $396,733 (1.2 percent) over budget. General government costs were over budget by $179,536, mainly due to new employee positions added in 2013. Public safety expenditures were over budget by $388,766 due to the change in the way the City accounts for fire aid payments as recommended by the State Auditor. The following graph presents the City's General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years: 16,500,000 15,000,000 13,500,000 12,000,000 10,500,000 9,000, 000 7,500, 000 6,000,000 4,500,000 3,000,000 1,500, 000 General Fund Expenditures by Function Year Ended December 31, 2013 General Public Safety Public Works Parks Other Government ❑ 2009 ❑ 2010 ❑ 2011 02012 02013 Total General Fund expenditures for 2013 were $2,267,353 (7.6 percent) higher than the previous year, with the most significant increase being in public safety ($1,011,154). This increase was mostly related to the new dispatchers hired and increased inspections personnel added for fiscal 2013. The change in how the City records state fire aid discussed above also impacted the increase in expenditures. -11- ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW The City maintains a number of enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City's enterprise funds, which includes the Utilities, Liquor, Aquatic Center, Golf Course, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough Park, Centennial Lakes, and Sports Dome Funds. ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City's enterprise funds during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, as restated for the change in accounting principle reported in 2013, presented both by classification and by fund: Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position Net Position Total — enterprise funds $ 83,605,223 $ 78,803,936 $ 4,801,287 In total, the net position of the City's enterprise funds increased by $4,801,287 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The majority of the increase is due to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund. -12- as of December 31, Increase 2013 2012 (Restated) (Decrease) Net position of enterprise funds Total by classification Net investment in capital assets $ 66,126,387 $ 63,766,144 $ 2,360,243 Restricted for debt service 611,377 876,909 (265,532) Unrestricted 16,867,459 14,160,883 2,706,576 Total — enterprise funds $ 83,605,223 $ 78,803,936 $ 4,801,287 Total by fund Utilities $ 65,879,790 $ 61,407,368 $ 4,472,422 Liquor 3,078,285 2,950,374 127,911 Aquatic Center 2,814,917 2,701,433 113,484 Golf Course 4,992,844 4,991,850 994 Arena 2,574,340 2,328,529 245,811 Nonmajor funds 4,265,047 4,424,382 (159,335) Total — enterprise funds $ 83,605,223 $ 78,803,936 $ 4,801,287 In total, the net position of the City's enterprise funds increased by $4,801,287 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The majority of the increase is due to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund. -12- UTILITIES FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Utilities Fund: $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Utilities Fund Year Ended December 31, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 OOperating Revenue © Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Utilities Fund ended 2013 with a net position of $65,879,790, an increase of $4,472,422 from the prior year. Of this, $51,857,818 represents the investment in utility distribution system capital assets, leaving $14,021,972 of unrestricted net position. Utilities Fund operating revenue was $17,830,425 for 2013, up $107,322, or 0.6 percent, mostly due to an increase in rates for fiscal 2013. Operating expenses, including interest expense, were $1,220,042, or 9.6 percent, more than last year, mainly due to increased depreciation expense and increased water line repairs during the year. -13- LIQUOR FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Liquor Fund: $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 Liquor Fund Year Ended December 31, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 O Sales oCost of Sales OOperating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) The Liquor Fund ended 2013 with a net position of $3,078,285, an increase of $127,911 from the prior year. Of the net position balance, $1,374,113 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving $1,704,172 of unrestricted net position. Liquor sales for 2013 were $13,711,557, an increase of $480,616 (3.6 percent) from the previous year. Sales have steadily increased over the last several years, increasing 19.9 percent since 2007. The Liquor Fund generated a gross profit of $3,746,794 in 2013, or 27.3 percent, of gross sales. The Liquor Fund gross profit margin has increased the last two years with a gross profit of 27.3 percent after an average gross profit of 26.4 percent for the previous five years. Operating expenses for 2013 were $2,299,650, which is $175,174, or 8.3 percent, higher than last year, mainly for contracted services. -14- AQUATIC CENTER FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Aquatic Center Fund: $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 Aquatic Center Fund Year Ended December 31, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Operating Revenue © Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Aquatic Center Fund ended 2013 with a net position of $2,814,917, an increase of $113,484 from the prior year. Of the net position balance, $1,989,780 represents investments in aquatic center capital assets, $611,377 restricted for debt service, leaving $213,760 of unrestricted net position. Aquatic Center Fund operating revenues for 2013 were $928,055, which is $73,891 (7.4 percent) lower than last year, mostly due to a decrease in usage during 2013, as the weather during the season was cooler and wetter than fiscal 2012. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2013, were $823,472, a decrease of $42,879 from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, operating income was positive in each of the five years presented. -15- GOLF COURSE FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Golf Course Fund: $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $(500,000) $(1,000,000) Golf Course Fund Year Ended December 31, i ON r MERM 10111 0 i■ IN IN 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 oOperating Revenue f Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Golf Course Fund ended 2013 with a net position of $4,992,844, an increase of $994 from the prior year. Of this, $6,354,919 represents the investment in golf course land and capital assets, leaving a deficit of $(1,362,075) of unrestricted net position. Golf Course Fund operating revenues for 2013 were $2,711,743, which is $513,848 (15.9 percent) less than the previous year, mainly due to the unfavorable weather during the summer and spring causing a late opening of the course. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2013, were $3,199,962, down $92,783 from the prior year. On an annual basis, this fund has had to borrow from other funds to fund cash flow needs. The interf ind borrowing remained the same during 2013 compared to 2012, at a total of $1,000,000. Due to the cash flow losses over recent years, management has developed a plan to support operations of this fund by making a transfer from other funds on an annual basis until the financial position improves. The transfer made during 2013 totaled $468,681 from the General Fund, Construction Fund, and Liquor Fund. !S[l ARENA FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Arena Fund: $2,500,000 $2,250,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $1,500,000 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 $(250,000) $(500,000) $(750,000) Arena Fund Year Ended December 31, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 o Operating Revenue D Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense The Arena Fund ended 2013 with a net position of $2,574,340, an increase of $245,811 from the prior year. Of this, $2,795,895 represents the investment in the arena capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($221,555) unrestricted net position. Arena Fund operating revenues for 2013 were $1,942,971, $490,536 more than last year. This increase relates to the City beginning operating concessions in calendar 2013. The City also added a retail sales area increasing rental income in 2013. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for 2013 were $2,272,494, an increase of $91,358 from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, the operating loss decreased from the previous year, with a decrease in the loss of $399,178. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from other funds on an annual basis. These transfers totaled $557,345 in fiscal 2013 from the General Fund, Construction Fund, and Liquor Fund. -17- ART CENTER FUND The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Art Center Fund: $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $(100,000) $(200,000) $(300,000) Art Center Fund Year Ended December 31, MINE M MINE ME ME ME M ME ME ME ME 0 2009 2010 2011 Operating Revenue Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) 2012 2013 The Art Center Fund ended 2013 with a net position of $360,587, an increase of $32,801 from the prior year. Of this, $170,174 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving $190,413 of unrestricted net position. Art Center Fund operating revenues for 2013 were $467,021, $25,080 more than the prior year. Operating expenses for 2013 were $607,649, which decreased $9,928 from the prior year. As can be seen in the above table, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from,the Liquor Fund on an annual basis. This transfer totaled $165,000 in fiscal 2013. -18- EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND AND CENTENNIAL LAKES FUND The Edinborough Park Fund and Centennial Lakes Fund were recorded as two separate enterprise funds by the City starting in fiscal 2012, after previously being reported as a combined fund. The Edinborough Park Fund ended 2013 with net position of $2,659,900, an increase of $19,115 from the prior year. Of this, $1,235,114 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $1,424,786 of unrestricted net position. Edinborough Park Fund operating revenues for 2013 were $1,423,056, which was $179,603, or 14.4 percent, higher than fiscal 2012. Operating expenses increased only $59,809. The Centennial Lakes Fund ended 2013 with net position of $1,244,560, a decrease of $211,251 from the prior year. Of this, $331,628 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $912,932 of unrestricted net position. Centennial Lakes Fund operating revenues for 2013 were $735,556, which was $21,860, or 3.1 percent, higher than the prior year. Operating expenses increased $75,095 due to increased repair and maintenance costs. -19- GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In addition to fund -based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City as a single, unified entity. These government -wide financial statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long -term liabilities. STATEMENT OF NET POSITION The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what your city owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is divided into three components: net investment capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted. The following table presents the components of City's net position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 as restated, for the change in accounting principle reported in fiscal 2013 for governmental activities and business -type activities: Net position Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total governmental activities Business -type activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total business -type activities Total net position As of December 31, Increase 2013 2012 (Restated) (Decrease) $ 83,842,970 20,289,579 33,242,317 137,374,866 66,126,387 611,377 16,867,459 83,605,223 $ 78,644,392 23,215,910 28,735,931 130,596,233 63,766,144 876,909 14,160,883 78,803,936 $ 5,198,578 (2,926,331) 4,506,386 6,778,633 2,360,243 (265,532) 2,706,576 4,801,287 $ 220,980,089 $ 209,400,169 $ 11,579,920 Net investments in capital assets increased in both the governmental activities and business -type activities due to significant capital projects occurring in the fiscal year. The increase in the unrestricted net position in the governmental activities relates to significant new special assessments in 2013. The increase in unrestricted net assets in the business -type activities relates to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund. -20- STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The Statement of Activities tracks the City's yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other transactions that increase or reduce total net position. These amounts represent the full cost of providing services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund -based financial statements. This statement includes the cost of supplies used, depreciation of long -lived capital assets, and other accrual -based expenses. The following table presents the change in the net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 as restated, for the change in accounting principle reported in fiscal 2013: Net (expense) revenue Governmental activities General government Public safety Public works Parks and recreation Interest on long -term debt Business -type activities Utilities Liquor Aquatic center Golf course Arena Community activity centers Total net (expense) revenue 2013 2012 Program Net Change Expenses Revenues Net Change as Restated $ 8,256,261 $ 1,890,763 $ (6,365,498) $ (11,107,681) 17,117,693 8,634,743 (8,482,950) (9,216,802) 11,502,250 6,859,188 (4,643,062) (160,459) 6,132,709 669,930 (5,462,779) (4,727,204) 2,024,749 118,780 (1,905,969) (2,043,262) 13,748,186 18,320,612 4,572,426 5,330,947 12,261,413 13,711,5 57 1,450,144 1,490,197 822,932 928,820 105,888 136,789 3,199,815 2,711,743 (488,072) (63,825) 2,272,510 1,960,955 (311,555) 27,177 2,967,115 2,633,739 (333,376) (433,205) $ 80,305,633 $ 58,440,830 (21,864,803) (20,767,328) General revenues Property taxes and tax increments 30,876,099 29,421,597 Franchise taxes 1,891,967 815,530 Unrestricted investment earnings (174,238) 455,163 Gain on disposal of capital assets 34,241 2,644,854 Insurance recovery 816,654 — Total general revenues 33,444,723 33,337,144 Change in net position $ 11,579,920 $ 12,569,816 One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side -by -side comparison to illustrate the difference in the . way the City's governmental and business -type operations are fmanced. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City's governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City's business -type activities are generating sufficient program revenues (service charges and program - specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources. -21- LEGISLATIVE UPDATES Despite an improving economy, the 2013 Legislature faced the familiar prospect of having to address a significant projected deficit in order to adopt a balanced budget for the next biennium. The November 2012 financial forecast projected a deficit of $1.1 billion in the state General Fund for the 2014 -2015 biennium, which was revised down to a $627 million deficit in the February 2013 forecast. Even with this challenge, there was an expectation that with one political party holding the Governor's office and majorities in both the House and Senate, this biennial budget agreement would be reached more quickly and easily than the previous one, which featured numerous vetoes, a special session, and the longest shutdown of non - essential state government services in Minnesota history. While in the end there was no special session or government shutdown, the 2013 session still stretched until the final day allowable under the state constitution, with the last bill passed at midnight. The following is a summary of recent legislative activity affecting the finances of Minnesota cities in 2013 and into the future: Local Government Aid (LGA) — The state -wide LGA appropriation for fiscal 2013 was set to increase about 2.8 percent to $426.4 million. However, the 2012 Legislature froze 2013 LGA payments at 2012 levels for cities with a population of 5,000 or more. For cities with populations below 5,000, 2013 LGA was the greater of their 2012 aid or the amount they would have received for 2013 under existing law. The 2013 Legislature completely overhauled the LGA formula for fiscal year 2014 and thereafter, creating a three- tiered formula that includes separate "need factor" calculations for cities with populations under 2,500, between 2,500 and 10,000, or over 10,000. The new formula simplifies the LGA calculation, and is designed to reduce the volatility of the LGA distribution by limiting the amount it may decline in a given year. Under the new formula, each city's LGA distribution for 2014 will be no less than their 2013 LGA. Beginning in 2015, any reduction to a city's LGA distribution will be limited to the lesser of $10 per capita, or 5 percent of their previous year net tax levy. For cities that gain under the new formula, the increases will be distributed proportionate to their unmet need, as determined by the new "need factor" calculations. The state -wide LGA appropriation is $507.6 million for fiscal 2014, $509.1 million for 2015, and $511.6 million for fiscal 2016 and thereafter. Levy Limits — A levy limit for city property tax levies payable in 2014 was established for all cities with populations exceeding 2,500. The levy limit base is the certified levy (excluding special levies) plus the certified LGA for taxes payable in fiscal 2012 or 2013, whichever is greater, increased by 3 percent. The levy limit is equal to the base, less the city's certified LGA for fiscal 2014. Levies for special purposes such as debt service, abatements, or voter - approved purposes, are not subject to this limitation. Market Value Definitions — A number of levy, tax, spending, debt, and similar limits that had previously been computed based on "market value" or "taxable market value" must now be computed based on "estimated market value." This change was enacted to eliminate the effects of the homestead market value exclusion established in 2011. Levy Authority for Watershed Management Plan — Cities are granted the authority to levy taxes to provide funding for the implementation of a comprehensive watershed management plan. Tax Status of Leased Tax - Exempt Property — Tax - exempt property owned by a political subdivision and held under a lease for a term of at least one year, or under a contract for the purchase thereof, is considered to be the property of the person holding it for all purposes of taxation. This change makes the tax treatment of leased property owned by local governments consistent with leased property owned by the federal government. -22- Tax Increment Financing (TIF) — A number of changes and clarifications were made to rules governing the use of TIF, including: • The prohibition on using tax increments for improvements or equipment primarily of a decorative or aesthetic nature, or with costs twice as high due to the selection of materials or designs compared to more commonly used improvements or equipment, is eliminated. • The four -year rule originally applying to TIF Districts certified between January 1, 2005 and April 20, 2009 is extended through December 31, 2016. • Development authorities may elect to reduce the original net tax capacity of qualifying TIF districts for the effects of the homestead market value exclusion that replaced the homestead tax credit program. • Taxes paid by captured tax capacity of TIF districts that are attributable to the new general education levy authorized by the 2013 Legislature, will be paid to the school district that imposes the levy. Park Dedication Fees — A clarification was made to define the basis on which a city calculates a park dedication fee charged to a developer in lieu of dedicating land for park usage. The fee must be calculated on the fair market value of the land as annually determined by the city based on tax valuation or other relevant data. The new law also provides a method for resolving valuation disputes through negotiation or the use of independent appraisals of land in the same land use category. Host Community Economic Development Grants — A new program was created that will provide grants for the acquisition and improvement of publicly owned capital assets for metro -area cities that host waste disposal facilities. No local matching funds are required. Change to Small Cities Development Block Grants — The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development is now allowed to provide a forgivable loan through the Small Cities Development, Block Grant Program directly to a private enterprise. The city in which the private enterprise is located is no longer required to submit an application, only a resolution of support. Wastewater and Stormwater Funding — Several changes were made to wastewater and stormwater grant and loan programs administered by the Public Facilities Authority. The changes include expanded eligibility for some programs, and increased grant or loan ceilings for others. Sales Tax Exemption — Cities are exempted from paying sales tax on qualifying purchases, effective for purchases made on or after January 1, 2014. This exemption does not include purchases of goods or services to be used as inputs to goods or services cities provide to the public that are generally provided by a private business, such as liquor stores, golf courses, marinas, or fitness centers. Cities with a population over 500 will be required to include a property tax savings report along with its proposed 2013 payable 2014 property tax levy certification, with the amount of sales or use taxes paid or estimated to have been paid in fiscal 2012. Cities must also discuss the savings resulting from the sales tax exemption at their fall truth -in- taxation public hearings. Organized Solid Waste Collection — The process for imposing the city - organized collection of solid waste was streamlined and better defined. The previous 180 -day process for cities to adopt organized collection of solid waste was eliminated. The process now begins with a 60 -day period in which cities may negotiate with collectors currently operating in the city, thereby giving them the first opportunity to develop a proposal for organized collection. If the 60 -day negotiation period ends without an agreement, a city may continue the process by. passing a resolution to form a committee to study the methods of organizing collection and make recommendations. A city must provide public notice and hold at least one public hearing before deciding to implement organized collection. -23- Pensions — An omnibus pension bill was passed that made a number of changes to both state -wide pension plans and single employer relief associations, including: Changes to the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) General Plan: • The "average salary" for determining surviving spouse and dependent benefits was redefined. • A number of clarifications were made to what constitutes "salary" for plan purposes. • Changes were made to the level of annual post - retirement adjustments, which will vary based on the funding level of the plan. Changes to the PERA Police and Fire Plan: • Increases employee contribution rate from 9.6 percent of salary to 10.2 percent for fiscal 2014, and 10.8 percent for fiscal 2015 and thereafter. • Increases employer contribution rate from 14.4 percent of salary to 15.3 percent for fiscal 2014, and 16.2 percent for fiscal 2015 and thereafter. • A 20 -year proportional vesting period was established for new hires beginning in 2014, under which the member becomes 50 percent vested after 10 years, and vests an additional 5 percent annually until fully vested at 20 years. • The retirement annuity formula calculation was changed to incorporate the effect of the new 20 -year vesting period, and a new cap of 33 years on allowable service time included in the annuity calculation. • The early retirement reduction factor was increased from the current 2.4 percent per year to 5 percent, phased in over a 5 -year period beginning July 1, 2014. • Changes were made to the level of annual post - retirement adjustments, which will vary based on the funding level of the plan. Changes to single employer relief associations: o The threshold of assets at which police relief associations and salaried or volunteer fire relief associations must prepare financial statements and have them audited by an independent auditor was raised from $200,000 to $500,000. o Volunteer firefighter relief associations are now required to pay a supplemental survivor benefit whenever it pays a survivor benefit, regardless of whether it is authorized in the association bylaws. o Any change to the interest rate paid during the deferral period of lump -sum service pensions must be approved by the governing body of the city or independent firefighting corporation to which the association is related. In addition, a new supplemental state aid was created to provide funding for pension plans. An annual allotment of $15.5 million will be distributed among the PERA Police and Fire Plan ($9 million), municipal volunteer firefighter associations ($5.5 million allocated based on proportionate share of fire state aid), and the Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Plan ($1 million). Expansion of Debt Authority — Several changes were made to expand the allowable uses of certain types of debt, including: • Home rule charter city or statutory city capital notes are allowed to be used for the purchase of application development services and training related to the use of computer hardware and software. • Capital improvement program (CIP) bonds are allowed to be used for expenditures incurred before the adoption of the CIP, if the expenditures are included in the plan. • Street reconstruction bonds are allowed to be used for bituminous overlay projects, which previously had not been included in the definition of reconstruction. -24- Authorized Investments — The list of authorized investments for cities was expanded to include: revenue obligations issued by local governments without levy authority that are rated AA or better; short-term (13 month maturity or less) obligation issued by a school district that is either rated in the highest credit rating category or covered by the State of Minnesota Credit Enhancement Program; and short-term (18 month maturity or less) guaranteed investment contracts when the issuer's or guarantor's short-term debt is rated in the highest rating category, even if their long -term debt is rated below the top two rating categories. Elections — The Legislature passed an omnibus elections policy bill that made a number of changes and clarifications to election requirements, including: • Establishing "no excuse" absentee balloting; • Increasing the time for counting absentee ballots from 4 days prior to the election to 7; • Reducing the number of people a voter may vouch for in a polling place from 15 to 8; • Eliminating the requirement to have at least one telecommunications device for deaf voter registration in every city of the first, second, or third class; • Requiring that the municipal clerk designated to administer absentee ballots also be responsible for the administration of a "ballot board "; • Reducing the number of election judges required in a precinct for elections other than a general election from 4 to 3, for precincts with more than 500 voters; and allowing the minimum number of three election judges for all elections including general elections for precincts with less than 500 registered voters; • Modifying the vote differentials requiring publically funded recounts to 0.25 percent in elections where more than 50,000 votes are cast, and 0.5 percent for elections in which between 400 and 50,000 votes are cast; • Amending the time period in which cities are prohibited from holding a special election from the first 40 days following a general election to the first 56 days; • Increasing the number of days' notice a city clerk must provide to a county auditor before holding a municipal election from 67 to 74 days; and • Establishing a pilot program and task force for the use of electronic rosters of voters. Alternative Bid Publication for Projects Funded by Special Assessments — A technical change was made to eliminate duplicative publication requirements for projects funded with special assessments. The defmition of "recognized industry trade journal" was broadened to include websites or electronic publications, thereby eliminating circumstances that were forcing cities utilizing an alternative electronic publication method to also publish written notice for certain projects. Met Council Allocated Costs — A change was made to allow cities that are allocated costs by the Met. Council to request the cost be deferred, or to be paid over time on a payment schedule with interest as agreed to by the Met Council. Liquor Licensing — An omnibus liquor bill was passed that made several changes to liquor licensing and distribution. Among the changes are: authorizing cities with municipal liquor operations to issue brewer taproom licenses that allow consumption on the premises or adjacent to malt liquor breweries; authorizing cities to issue brewers a license for off -sale of malt liquor packaged by the brewer; providing for the sale of malt - liquor educator licenses that will allow malt liquor tastings and education to be conducted similar to wine tastings; and allowing micro - distilleries to provide product samples on site. Tax - Exempt Holding Period for Development Property — The tax exempt holding period for city -owned land held for development is increased from 9 to 15 years for property acquired between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010, or for property located in a city outside of the metro area with a population under 20,000. -25- Citizen Contact Information Classified as Private Data — Citizen contact information submitted to cities in order to receive certain notifications or to subscribe to the city's electronic publications, such as phone numbers or email addresses, is now classified as private data. The names of people on such lists remain public information. Criminal History and Background Checks — Cities are authorized to perform criminal history checks on applicants for: city employment, volunteer positions, or a license that does not otherwise subject the applicant to a criminal history check. Such criminal history checks may not be substituted for statutorily mandated background checks. Background checks are now required for all fire department applicants, and are allowed for current fire department employees. The fire chief is also required to perform criminal history record checks of applicants. -26- ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT N0.67 — FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSION PLANS — AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NOS. 25 AND 50 The primary objective of this statement is to improve financial reporting by state and local government pension plans. GASB Statement No. 67 replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 25 and 50 for pension plans that are administered through trusts or equivalent arrangements that meet the following criteria: contributions from employers and nonemployer contributing entities to the pension plan and earnings on those contributions are irrevocable; pension plan assets are dedicated to providing pensions to plan members in accordance with the benefit terms; and pension plan assets are legally protected from the creditors of employers, nonemployer contributing entities, and the pension plan administrator. If the plan is a defined benefit pension plan, plan assets also are legally protected from creditors of the plan members. The requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 25 and 50 remain applicable to pension plans that are not administered through trusts covered by the scope of this statement and to defined contribution plans that provide post - employment benefits other than pensions. The statement makes a number of changes in the financial statement presentation, measurement, and required disclosures relating to the reporting of these types of pension plans. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2013. Earlier application is encouraged. GASB STATEMENT NO. 68 — ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS — AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NOS. 27 AND 50 The primary objective of this statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting by state and local governments for pensions. This statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 27 and 50, as they relate to pensions that are provided through pension plans administered as trusts or equivalent arrangements that meet certain criteria (as described earlier for GASB Statement No. 67). The requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 27 and 50 remain applicable for pensions that are not covered by the scope of this statement. This statement establishes standards for measuring and recognizing liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense /expenditures. In addition, this statement details the recognition and disclosure requirements for employers with liabilities (payables) to a defined benefit pension plan and for employers whose employees are provided with defined contribution pensions. This statement also addresses circumstances in which a nonemployer entity has a legal requirement to make contributions directly to a pension plan. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2014. Earlier application is encouraged. Included in this statement are major changes in how employers that participate in cost - sharing pension plans, such as the Teachers' Retirement Association (TRA) and PERA, account for pension benefit expenses and liabilities. In financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting (government -wide and proprietary funds), a cost - sharing employer that does not have a special funding situation is required to recognize a liability for its proportionate share of the net pension liability of all employers with benefits provided through the pension plan. A cost - sharing employer is required to recognize pension expense and report deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions for its proportionate share of collective pension expense and collective deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions. In addition, the effects of (1) a change in the employer's proportion of the collective net pension liability and (2) differences during the measurement period between the employer's contributions and its proportionate share of the total of contributions from employers included in the collective net pension liability are required to be determined. These effects are required to be recognized in the employer's pension expense in a systematic and rational manner over a closed period equal to the average of the expected remaining service lives of all active and inactive employees that are provided with pensions through the pension plan. -27- GASB STATEMENT N0.69 - GOVERNMENT COMBINATIONS AND DISPOSALS OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS This statement provides accounting and financial reporting guidance, including disclosure requirements, for government combinations and disposals of government operations. Government combinations include mergers, acquisitions, and transfers of operations. Included within the scope of this statement are combinations of governmental entities, or combinations of governmental entities with nongovernmental entities (such as a nonprofit entity), as long as the new or continuing organization is a government. This statement does not apply to combinations in which a government acquires an organization that continues to exist as a separate entity, or acquires an equity interest in an organization that remains legally separate from the acquiring government. A disposal of operations occurs when a government either transfers or sells specific operations. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is encouraged. CHANGES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL GRANTS In December 2013, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued "Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Audits," which supersedes all or parts of eight OMB circulars; consolidating federal cost principles, administrative principles, and audit requirements in one document. The "Super Circular" includes a number of significant changes to the federal Single Audit process, including an increase in dollar threshold for requiring a Single Audit, changes to the thresholds and process used for determining major programs, a reduction in the percentage of expenditures required to be covered by a Single Audit, revised criteria for determining low -risk auditees, and an increase in the threshold for reporting questioned costs. The draft version of this guidance also included proposed reductions in the number of compliance requirements to be tested in a Single Audit, but final guidance on those changes will not be available until an updated compliance supplement is issued in 2014. -28- To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M. VI. A. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Issuance of Housing Revenue Bond On Behalf of Yorktown Continental, LP, Resolution No. 2014 -65 Conduit Debt Action Requested: Hold public hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -65 Giving Preliminary Approval of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Yorktown Continental, LP Project), Series 2014 Information / Background: Yorktown Continental, LP (the "Borrower "), a limited- purpose entity, proposes to acquire and rehabilitate the existing 264 -unit Yorktown Continental apartment building located at 7151 York Avenue South. The Borrower is requesting that the City give preliminary approval to the issuance of up to $26,500,000 in bonds to finance a portion of the cost of the project. Other sources of financing for the approximately $64,000,000 project include various sources of taxable financing and low- income housing tax credit equity. Final approval of the project and bond issuance by the City is subject to completion the public hearing, and review of documents. Representatives from Yorktown Continental will be at the public hearing to discuss the project and the financing. The attached resolution as drafted by Dorsey & Whitney gives preliminary authorization for the issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds on behalf of Yorktown Continental, LP for the proposed project at 7151 York Avenue South. The Bonds will be special, limited obligations of the City and will be payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof. No holder of any Bond will ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds, or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City, except money payable by the Borrower to the City and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, to issue the Bonds to finance multifamily housing developments such as the Development. If the Council approves Resolution 2014 -65, Yorktown Continental, LP proposes to return at the July I Council meeting for the sale of the bonds. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2014 -65 Program for Multifamily Housing Development Tax- Exempt Revenue Bond Financing Guidelines Affidavit of Publication City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO TO THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTERS 462A AND 462C ON BEHALF OF YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL, LP Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on June 17, 2014, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall. Councilmembers present: Councilmembers absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through RESOLUTION NO. 2014-65 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL, LP PROJECT), SERIES 2014 I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certifying that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. 2014. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of , Debra Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL, LP PROJECT), SERIES 2014 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The City has by resolution adopted May 20, 2014, given preliminary approval to the issuance of its Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Yorktown Continental, LP Project), Series 2014 in a principal amount not to exceed $26,500,000 (the "Bonds ") for the purpose of making a loan to Yorktown Continental, LP, a Minnesota limited partnership (the `Borrower ") to finance a portion of the costs of the acquisition, rehabilitation and equipping of a 264 -unit low- income housing development (the "Project ") located at 7151 York Avenue South in the City. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act "), to issue the Bonds to finance multifamily housing projects such as the Project. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that programs for such multifamily housing projects may be financed with revenue bonds issued by the City, following adoption of a housing program, after a public hearing, and other proceedings conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Act. A copy of the Housing Program prepared with respect to the Project and its financing (the "Housing Program ") has been presented to this Council and is ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The Housing Program has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment as required by the Act. 1.2. At a public hearing, duly noticed and held on the date hereof, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, subdivision 5 and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on the proposal to issue the Bonds and approve the Housing Program, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to such proposal and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Manager before the date of the hearing. Section 2. Preliminary Approval of Bond Financing. On the basis of the information given the City to date, the views submitted at the public hearing and the written comments (if any) submitted to the City on the Housing Program and issuance of the Bonds, the Housing Program is hereby adopted and preliminary approval is hereby given to the issuance of the Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $26,500,000, to provide financing for the Project. The adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed, however, to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its Council to issue or to cause the issuance of the Bonds. All details of the Bonds and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to final approval of this.Council prior to their issuance. The Bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues to be received from the operation of the Project and owner thereof specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each !M Bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from said revenues and funds specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt or pecuniary liability of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. Attest: Adopted this 17th day of June, 2014. Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and upon vote being taken thereon, the following whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -3- CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL PROJECT General Proms The City believes that a need 'exists to provide affordable housing options available within the City and the surrounding area. To meet such housing needs, the City plans to encourage the development and maintenance in the City of multifamily housing particularly adapted to the needs of low- income residents. A major method available to the City to encourage the development of affordable multifamily housing is the issuance of tax- exempt bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, including without limitation Section 462C.07, and Sections 142(d) or 145, as appropriate, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended the "Code "). The specific development described in this Housing Program will be undertaken to further the policies and goals stated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, including particularly the goal of providing affordable housing in the City. This program is subject to amendment or waiver by the City. Description of the Development To Be Financed Yorktown Continental, LP, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Borrower "), is a single - purpose entity with no assets other than the Project, as hereinafter defined, and revenues derived therefrom. The Borrower proposes to finance the acquisition, rehabilitation and equipping of a senior low income housing project located at 7151 York Avenue South in the City (the "Project "). The Borrower anticipates financing a portion of the costs of the Project through the issuance of bonds, in one or more series, by the City in the approximate principal amount of $26,500,000 (the `Bonds "). The Project consists of the acquisition and rehabilitation of an existing 264 -unit building containing 262 one - bedroom units and two two - bedroom units (the "Units "), together with related parking and common areas. At least 40 percent (40 %) of the Units in the Project will be leased to individuals earning at or below 60% of the of the median income for the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area that includes Minneapolis /St. Paul, Minnesota ( "AMI "). In addition, 100% of the units are expected to be leased to tenants earning at or below 80% of AMI. The entire Project will be subject to the exempt facility requirements of Section 142(d) of the Code, which are further described below under the heading "Meeting the Needs of Low and Moderate Income Persons." The Project will be a development described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, Subdivision 1(c). The Project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The owner of the Project will be required to operate the Project in accordance with state and local anti - discrimination laws and ordinances,. as well as requirements applicable to substantial rehabilitation projects in neighborhoods targeted by the City for revitalization. Revenue Bond Financing The Bonds are proposed to be issued pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07, subdivision 1. The Bonds will be issued in one or more series. The underwriter of the Bonds is expected to be Dougherty & Company LLC. The Bond sale is expected to be completed by August 31, 2014. Attached as Exhibit A is a Sources and Uses Summary showing, on a preliminary basis, the Bonds to be issued and the costs to be paid.. It is likely that the final sources and uses will vary from this Exhibit — but the aggregate principal amount of Bonds to be issued will not exceed the figure above. It is anticipated that most of the Bonds will be issued on a tax- exempt basis as "exempt facility bonds" pursuant to Section 142(d) of the Code. The Bonds will not be general obligations of the City, but will be secured only by the revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof pursuant to the financing agreement(s) and the trust indenture(s) pursuant to which the Bonds will be issued. Substantially all of the net proceeds of the Bonds (the initial principal amount thereof, less amounts deposited in a reasonably required reserve, if any, or paid out as costs of issuance of the Bonds) will be used to pay the costs of the Project. Meeting Needs of Low and Moderate Income Persons As a condition for providing financing for the Project, the City is requiring that the Borrower enter. into a fifteen -year Regulatory Agreement with the City wherein the City will require that the' Project be operated as a residential rental project with at least 40% of the residential units in the Project occupied (within the meaning of the regulations under Section 142(d) of the Code), by Low Income Tenants during the Qualified Project Period. "Low Income Tenants" means tenants whose adjusted gross income at the time of their initial occupancy is sixty percent (60 %) or less of AMI. Each tenant's adjusted household income is determined in a manner consistent with income determinations under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended without adjustment for family size. "Qualified Project Period" means the period beginning on the date of issue of the Bonds and ending on the later of the date: (a) which is fifteen years after the date on which at least fifty percent of the units of the Project are first occupied; (b) on which no tax- exempt private activity bond issued with respect to the Project is outstanding; or -2- (c) on which any assistance provided with respect to the Project under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, terminates. In addition, the Project is subject to a Use Agreement and Amendment of Existing Regulatory Agreement for Nonprofit Investors dated July 12, 1996 with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for the remaining. useful life of the Project. Under such agreement, the Borrower expects that 251 of the Project's units will be leased to tenants earning 50% or less of AMI. Such agreement is subject to amendment. Bond Allocation. The City, at the request of the Borrower, will apply for a volume cap allocation for issuance of the Bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474A. Monitoriniz Methods It is believed that the oversight exercised by the trustee bank and certain other parties will be adequate to insure the Project as presented is in fact carried out. The.Project must be operated by the Borrower in accordance with various operating covenants (relating to such things as maintenance, insurance, etc.) to be contained in the financing agreement(s) and related mortgage loan documents to be entered into by the City, the Borrower and certain other parties, which financing agreement(s) and mortgage loan documents will be assigned by the City, to the extent of the City's interests, and to the trustee bank as security for the Bondholders. The City will be required to monitor compliance with the income and rent restrictions set forth in the Regulatory Agreement and will require regular reporting from the Borrower as to the incomes of tenants occupying the lower - income units and the rental rates for such units. The City, the HRA and their staffs can satisfactorily monitor such compliance. All costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project and the issuance of the Bonds will be paid by the Borrower. The Borrower will pay an up -front issuance fee of '/2 of 1% of the total principal amount of the Bonds to defray ongoing administrative costs to be incurred by the City. Housing Program Dated May 22, 2014 Public Hearing Held June 17, 2014 -3- EXHIBI•T A SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources of Funds: Par amount of Series 2014ABonds 16,500,000 Par amount of Series 2014B Bonds 65360;000 Par amount of GNMA Mortgage 15,000,000 Seller Note 19,500,000 Tax Credit Equity 5,808,890 Cash flow from operations 743,567 Borrower equity / deferred developer fee 381,895 Total Sources Uses of Funds: $64,294,352 Acquisition Cost 22,100,000 Deposit to Investment Vehicle 16,500,000 Construction Costs 15,629,140 Architect's Fees 599,696 Loan Costs 1,073,494 Costs of Issuance 579,400 Tax Credit Fees 138,897 Reserves and Escrows 3,625,453 Developer Fee 4,048,272 Total Uses $64,294,352 FEW OT ��X_"X_ TAX- EXEMPT REVENUE BOND FINANCING GUIDELINES 1. A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF THE BOND PROCEEDS MUST BE USED FOR PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS OR TO REFUND PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CITYOF EDINA BONDS OR TO PROMOTE OR PRESERVE HOUSING FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME INDIVIDUALS OR FAMILIES. In addition to new construction, public improvements include replacing or rehabilitating basic building systems such as plumbing, electrical, mechanical, structural, energy efficiency improvements, leasehold improvements, or improvements correcting or, improving accessibility for disabled persons. 2. ALL PROPERTIES RECEIVING REVENUE BOND FINANCING MUST COMPLY WITH URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS. Urban design standards include adequate parking, landscaping, screening, and noise and air quality. 3. REVENUE BONDS WILL ONLY BE ISSUED IF: O The Bonds bear a rating of at least "A" or an equivalent rating, or • The Bonds are privately placed rather than publicly offered, or • The Bonds are secured by a letter of credit from a financial institution acceptable to the City or other acceptable security sufficient at all times to cover debt service, or • There is submitted, to the City a feasibility study satisfactory to the Council which concludes that sufficient revenues will be generated to cover debt service. 4. THE CITY OF EDINA MAY ISSUE REVENUE BONDS A PORTION OF WHICH BENEFIT PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: O At least 51% of the bond proceeds must be directed to projects within Edina • A formal request must be received from the City in which the project is located • The City Council must conclude that the use of bond proceeds in another city will not cause a relocation of a business entity or employees from Edina 5. AN ISSUANCE FEE OF UP TO 1/2 PERCENTOFTHE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BOND ISSUE MUST BE PAID TO THE CITY IN ADDITION TO OTHER COSTS OF ISSUANCE. 6. THE ISSUANCEOFTHE REVENUE BONDS MUST NOTADVERSELYAFFECTTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ISSUE BANK QUALIFIED BONDS. 7. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SELECT BOND COUNSEL AND OTHER CONSULTANTS OR ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE BOND ISSUE. Adopted by City Council on April 3, 1995. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION City of Edina (Official Publication), STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) RELATING_ TO A HOUSING PROGRAM AND PROJECT ON Charlene Vold ui sworn on an oath, g y BEHALF OF YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL,' LP AND ITS states or affirms that they are the Authorized FINANCING UNDER SECTION Agent of the newspaper(s) known as: 142(0) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 AS AMENDED, AND CHAPTERS SC Edina 462A`AND 4S2C, MINNESOTA STATUTES; CALLING FOR A and has Tull knowledge of the facts stated FINA C NG AND A RELATED below: HOUSING PROGRAM,. (A) The newspaper has complied with all of CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA the requirements constituting qualifica- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that tion as a qualified newspaper as provided the City Council of the City of Edina, by Minn. Stat. §331A.02, §331A.01, and Minnesota (the "City'j, will meet on other applicable laws as amended. p.m., or as soon thereafter as preo- p msday, June 17, thereafter at rac- (B) This Public'Notice was printed and pub-. ticable,'In the Council Chambers lo- lished in said newspaper(s) for 1 succes- cated at Edina City Hall, 4801 West sive issues; the first insertion being on 50th Street In the City, for the pur- 05/29/2014 and the last insertion being on Pose of conducting a public hearing on 0i a proposal that the City Issue 05/29/2014. tax- exempt revenue bonds (the "Bonds', under Minnesota Stat- utes, Chapters 462A and 462C, as amended (the "Act1l and Section of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code', of 19 By: In order to finance a project (the Authorized Agent "Project") consisting of the acqui- sition, rehabilitation and equipping of a 264 -unit multifamily housing Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before facility located at 7151 York Avenue me on 05/29/2014. South in the City (the "Facilities'), togethenwith related project costs, on behalf of Yorktown Continental, •. Q LP, a Minnesota limited partnership and i) a housing program prepared ( with respect to.the Project and its Notary Public financing. The aggregate princl- pal amount of the Bonds to be is- sued for the Project will not exceed $26,500,000. The Bonds shall be special, lim- / . DIANE L. ELIASOjy iced obligations of the City and shall solely from the revenues NOTARY PU9UC- MINNESOTA be payable pledged to the payment thereof. No ®17tiYf• ! xp• Jan. holder of any Bond shall ever have 3i, 2015 the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds, or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereon against any property of the. City, except money payable by.the Bor- rower to the City and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. A draft copy of the housing pro- gram relating to the Project is avail- able for public inspection at. the office of the City Finance Director, located In City offices; between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:36'p.m:'on normal City business days. _ All persons interested may, ap- pear and be heard at the time and place set forth above,, or may file written comments with the City Fl- nance Director prior to the data of the hearing set forth above. Dated: May 29, 2014. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Rate Information: By /s/ Debra Mangen, City Clerk (1) Lowest classified, rate paid by commercial users I City Finance Director for comparable space: $34.45 per column inch Ad ID 225559 5/29/14, 3SC1, PHN Yorktown Commons, 225559 EVERWOOD DEVELOPMENT 730 Hennepin, Ste. 100 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Jennifer Hanson Partner Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South 6`h Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 RE: Yorktown Continental Dear Ms. Hanson: I am writing in response to your request for an explanation about maintaining affordability at Yorktown Continental. In June of 1996 a Use Agreement was executed with HUD that insured affordability at the building for a 50 year period. The level of affordability that is spelled out in this binding agreement is as follows: 1) 251 units at or below 50 %AMI; and 2) 13 units at or below 80% AMI. The existing Use Agreement with HUD will remain in place upon closing of the proposed bond deal. There will be no alteration, elimination or modification to the existing Use Agreement. -The Use Agreement guarantees maintaining affordability at Yorktown Continental until at least 2046. The current project -based Section 8 contract expires in September 2014. The new owners are negotiating a 20 year renewal for the 179 project -based Section 8 units currently located at the building. HUD is very excited about the proposed rehab and we expect the renewed HAP contract to be finalized soon. The Managing General Partner for the new owner is Affordable Homes For All (AHA). AHA is a non -' profit dedicated to providing affordable housing. I want to assure the City Council that maintaining affordability at Yorktown Continental is our primary focus. The substantial rehabilitation of Yorktown Continental will allow the building to provide quality affordable housing for years to come. Sincerely, David E. Dye, MAI Yorktown Continental, LP To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL o e ,aas Agenda Item #: VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding residential density for mixed use areas, building height floor area ratio and land use; Resolution No. 2014 -68. Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -68, approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Planning Commission Recommendation: On June 11, 2014 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Vote: 7 Ayes, 0 Nays. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) Information / Background: As a result of the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Lennar project at 6725 York Avenue, the Metropolitan Council has requested that the City of Edina establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each District. As demonstrated in the attached pages A I — A6 from the Planning Commission Staff Report, the residential density ranges in the Comprehensive Plan for Office Residential (OR), Mixed Use Center (MXC), Community Activity Center (CAC), (NC), Neighborhood Commercial and Regional Medical (RM) are from 1 -2 and 2 -3 units per acre. These densities are less than the City's Low Density Residential (LDR) district, which allows up to 5 units per acre. Densities from 1 -3 units per acre are not feasible for the intended mixed -use character or opportunity in these areas. The descriptions of these districts on pages A3 — A6, include "multifamily residential; vertical mixed use; serving areas larger than one neighborhood; the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage." Requiring densities less than the Low Density Residential (LDR) range does not encourage redevelopment with mixed uses in these areas; or reflect the types of redevelopment occurring in Edina and the Twin Cities. The Lennar project is located within the CAC district. By establishing new density ranges for these areas, the city would create the feasibility for mixed use projects. Changes to these density ranges would be accommodating growth that has been anticipated and planned for in the City's future population projections. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION In general, the proposed density ranges are based on the City's existing, approved and proposed development within each land use district; and staying consistent with existing residential density ranges already established within the Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014 - 68 Planning Commission Minutes: May 28 and June 11, 2014. Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 11, 2014 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIAL DENSITY FOR MIXED USE AREAS, BUILDING HEIGHT, FLOOR AREA RATIO AND LAND USE Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Metropolitan Council has requested that the City of Edina establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each District. Floor area ratio alone cannot be used to determine densities within mixed use areas as suggested in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. 1.02 Lennar Corporation is proposing to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, and build a six- story, 240 unit upscale apartment building with 11,000 square feet of retail on the first level. To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan were approved by the City Council: 1. Building Height - from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 70 feet. 2. Floor Area Ratio - to exceed 1.0 in some instances. 3. Re- guiding the Land Use Plan for the five single - family homes on Xerxes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. 1.03 On June 11, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The Edina Comprehensive Plan is a guide for development and redevelopment in the city that establishes density ranges for the purposes of managing growth. Density in mixed use and planned commercial districts are primarily regulated by Floor Area Ratio within the existing Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2.02 Residential density ranges within the City's mixed use areas including CAC, Community Activity Center; MXC, Mixed Use Center; OR, Office Residential; and NC, Neighborhood Commercial District are between 1 -2 and 2 -3 units per acre, which are not feasible for the intended mixed -use character or opportunity in these areas. The City's LDR, Low Density Residential District allows up to 5 units per acre, which is a higher density than the above mixed use districts. The RM, Regional Medical District does not have a residential density range and senior housing is a permitted use. 2.03 By establishing new residential density ranges for these areas, the city would create the feasibility for mixed use projects. Changes to these residential density ranges would be accommodating growth that had already been anticipated and planned for in the City's future population projections. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 2 2.04. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France. The floor area ratio maximum in the CAC is 1.0. The suggested density of 2 -3 units per acre would result in less density than the City's Low Density Residential area; which allows up to 5 units per acre, would not encourage a mixture of land uses. A density range of 12 -75 units per acre in this area is reasonable given the description of this area is the city's most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Floor area ratio would continue to impact densities based on the Zoning Ordinance regulations. 2.05. The OR, Office Residential District guides density at a range of 2 -3 units per acre in the current Comprehensive Plan. An OR density of 12 -30 units per acre would be consistent with High Density Residential District and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. 2.06. The MXC, Mixed Use Center district guides density at a range of 1 -2 units per acre. These areas include 50th & France, Grandview and Centennial Lakes/ Greater Southdale area. A Mixed Use Center density of 12 -30 units would be consistent with High Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. This density range is consistent with existing densities in all three of these areas, including 50th and France Condos (23 units per acre) and 71 France in the Centennial Lakes area (24 units per acre), and Grandview Square (29 units per acre.) 2.07 The NC, Neighborhood Commercial District guides density at a range of 1 -2 units per acre. A density of 5 -12 units would be consistent with Medium Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. 2.08 The RM, Regional Medical District is an area that is proposed for senior housing, and does not have a specific range for density. A Comprehensive Plan amendment was approved for the senior housing project at 6500 France. Senior Housing creates a lesser impact on traffic; therefore, higher densities can be supported in this area. Density for senior housing shall also be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. A density range of 12 -80 units per acre is reasonable to encourage that use in the district. 2.09. Establishing higher residential density ranges within mixed use areas, align with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including growth that had been forecasted by the Metropolitan Council. 2.10. The proposed densities using unit per acre are consistent with the existing descriptions of each land use category in the Comprehensive Plan; are consistent with existing development in Edina; and are consistent with the existing Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2.11. There is adequate roadway capacity and sewer capacity to support the proposed residential density ranges proposed in these mixed use areas. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxx x RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 3 2.12. The proposed land use change of the single family homes on Xerxes Avenue are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The City of Richfield has guided the single family homes on the east side of Xerxes as medium density residential, and the property to the north west and south in Edina are guided CAC, Community Activity Center; therefore, the long term vision of both Edina and Richfield in this area is for higher densities. 2.13. Podium height is proposed on both Xerxes and York as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. The six story portion of the building is stepped back into the site to minimize impact on adjacent property. 2.14. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use at 1.27, which is predominantly residential, is appropriate for the area. 2.15. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 3.01 Resolution 2014 -51 is rescinded. 3.02 The following Comprehensive Plan Amendments are approved subject to review by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §473.864: A. Future Land Use Categories. The categories in the table below apply to the Future Land Use Plan. It is important to note that land use categories are not zoning districts - they are broader and more long -term in scope. The land use plan and the zoning ordinance should be consistent with one another, but are not identical. Each land use category may be implemented through more than one zoning district, allowing for important differences in building height, bulk and coverage in different areas of the city. Some revisions to existing zoning districts or creation of new districts may ultimately be needed as part of the implementation of the land use plan. Land uses are characterized primarily by range of densities or intensities. For residential uses, density is defined in terms of dwelling units per net acre (exclusive of road rights -of- way and public lands). For nonresidential and mixed uses, intensity is typically defined in terms of floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, which refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. A density unit per acre range is listed below, however, in practice FAR limits the density in the Edina Zoning Ordinance based on site size. Thus, a maximum FAR of 1.0 could allow for a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, and so on. Building heights are not specified in the table, because height will vary within and between categories, based on neighborhood context, infrastructure, and community design goals. (See the discussion later in this section.) Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxx) RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 4 The "Development Guidelines" in the table below are intended to highlight important design considerations for each land use category, but are not regulatory in nature. When residential development is proposed in a mixed use district, the residential density range shall apply, in addition to the FAR requirement. Residential development is not required in mixed use areas. Residential Description, Land Uses Development Density Range Categories Guidelines LDR Applies to largely single - family Massing standards Low Density residential neighborhoods, g ( development) under develo ment 1- 5 units acre Residential encompassing a variety of lot and impervious Floor to Area Ratio: per sizes and street patterns (see coverage limitations current Zoning Code* "Character Districts" for more would apply to ensure detail). Typically includes small compatibility of infill institutional uses such as schools, construction. churches, neighborhood parks, etc. LDA Applies to two- family and Introduction of more Low - Density attached dwellings of low contemporary housing 4 - 8 units acre Attached Residential densities and moderate heights. types, such as low- Floor to Area Ratio: per This category recognizes the density townhouses, current Zoning Code* historical role of these housing may be an appropriate types as transitional districts replacement for two - between single - family residential family dwellings in areas and major thoroughfares or some locations, commercial districts. May provided that include single - family detached adequate transitions to dwellings. and buffering of adjacent dwellings can be achieved. MDR Applies to attached housing In new development Medium - Density (townhouses, quads, etc.) and or redevelopment, 5 -12 units acre Residential multi- family complexes of improve integration of Floor to Area Ratio: per moderate density. multi- family housing current Zoning Code* May also include small into an interconnected institutional uses, parks and open street network and space work to create an attractive, pedestrian- friendly street edge. HDR Existing "high- rise" and other Provide incentives for 12 - 30 units /acre Density High - Density concentrated multi- family updating older for senior housing may be Residential residential, some of which may multifamily buildings. increased to over 30 units contain a mixed use component. Work to create an per acre, based on May also include limited office, attractive, pedestrian- Proximity to hospitals, service or institutional uses friendly street edge proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, primarily to serve residents' and provide level of transit service needs, parks and open space convenient access to available, and impact on transit, schools, parks, adjacent roads. Other and other community desired items to allow Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xx�eE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 5 Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken destinations. greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. Floor to Area Ratio: per current Zoning Code* Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines Mixed Use Guidelines Categories NC Small- to moderate -scale Building footprints 2-3 5 -12 residential Neighborhood commercial, serving primarily the generally less than dwelling units/ acre Commercial adjacent neighborhood(s). 20,000 sq. ft. (or less Floor to Area Ratio -Per Current examples: Generally a 'node' rather than a for individual current Zoning Code: g • Morningside 'corridor.' Primary uses are retail storefronts). Parking is maximum of 1.0* commercial core and services, offices, studios, less prominent than institutional uses. Residential pedestrian features. • Valley View and Wooddale uses ermined. p Encourage structured • 70th & Cahill Existing and potential parking and open neighborhood commercial space linkages where districts are identified for further feasible; emphasize study. enhancement of the pedestrian environment. OR Transitional areas along major Upgrade existing 2- 312 -30 residential Office - Residential thoroughfares or between higher- streetscape and dwelling units /acre No current examples intensity districts and residential building appearance, Floor to Area Ratio -Per in City. Potential districts. Many existing highway - improve pedestrian current Zoning Code: examples include oriented commercial areas are and transit maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* Pentagon Park area anticipated to transition to this environment. and other I -494 more mixed -use character. Encourage structured corridor locations Primary uses are offices, attached parking and open or multifamily housing. space linkages where Secondary uses: Limited retail feasible; emphasize and service uses (not including the enhancement of "big box" retail), limited the pedestrian industrial (fully enclosed), environment. institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. O This designation allows for Provide Floor to Area Ratio - Per Office professional and business offices, buffer/ transition to Zoning Code: Current examples generally where retail services do adjacent residential Maximum of 0.5 include the office not occur within the development uses. Use high quality Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 6 buildings on the west I unless they are accessory uses side of TH 100 1 that serve the needs of office between 70th and 77th Streets. Nonresidential and Mixed Use MXC Mixed -Use Center Current examples: • 50th and France • Grandview CAC Community Activity Center Example: Greater Southdale area (not including large multi- family residential neighborhoods such as Centennial Lakes) building tenants. Vehicle access requirements for office uses are high; however, traffic generation from office buildings is limited to morning and evening peak hours during weekdays. Office uses should be located generally along arterial and collector streets. Description, Land Uses Established or emerging mixed use districts serving areas larger than one neighborhood (and beyond city boundaries). Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. The most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses: Retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings. Secondary uses: Institutional, recreational uses. Mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxiix permanent building materials and on -site landscaping. Encourage structured parking. Development Guidelines Maintain existing, or create new, pedestrian and streetscape amenities; encourage or require structured parking. Buildings "step down' in height from intersections. 4 stories at 5011, & France; 3 -6 stories at Grandview Form -based design standards for building placement, massing and street -level treatment. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. More stringent design standards for buildings > 5 stories. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer - grained circulation patterns where feasible. Density Guidelines 1-2 12-30 residential dwelling units/ acre Floor to Area Ratio -Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 1.5 2--312 -75 residential dwelling units /acre Floor to Area Ratio -Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 7 Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxiaE I Applies to existing Performance Floor to Area Ratio: Per Industrial predominantly industrial areas standards to ensure Zoning Code: 0.5* within the City. Primary uses: compatibility with industrial, manufacturing. adjacent uses; Secondary uses: limited retail screening of outdoor and service uses. activities. Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines Mixed Use Guidelines Categories RM Hospitals, senior housing *, Form -based design 12 -80 senior residential Regional Medical medical and dental offices and standards for building dwelling units/ acre clinics, and laboratories for placement, massing Floor to Area Ratio - Per performing medical or dental and street -level current Zoning Code: research, diagnostic testing, treatment. maximum of 1.0 For analytical or clinical work, having Pedestrian circulation medical office uses. a direct relationship to the and open space providing of health services. amenities should be Density for senior General office uses are permitted. provided for larger housing shall be based on sites. proximity to hospitals, * Senior housing may include: proximity to low density independent living, assisted living, uses, utilities capacity, memory care, and skilled nursing. level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. OSP Applies to major parks and Performance and N/A Open Space and protected open space that is buffering standards Parks publicly owned. May not include for intensive outdoor all small parks, since some are recreation, parking. included in residential land use districts. PSP Applies to schools, large Performance and To be determined - may Public/Semi- Public institutional uses (churches, buffering standards require review of large - cemeteries) and semi -public uses for intensive outdoor scale development or such as country clubs. Some recreation, parking. institutional expansion small uses of these types may be integrated into other land use districts. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxiaE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 8 LAH Expressways and access ramps NA NA Limited Access for two regional arterial Highway highways (TH 62 and TH 100) occupy land within the City to serve local and regional travel needs. *Floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, an FAR of 1.0 could mean a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, etc. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxxx RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -68 Page 9 B. Figure 4.3 is amended as follows: . 4 Figure 4.3 a e " City of Edina Future Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxxx Grrc RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 10 C. Figure 4.6B is amended as follows: Future Land Use Plan with e �^ City of Edina Building Heights 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Southeast Quadrant Fgwo 4.6B Data Source: URS 0 0.5 Miles 0�(-- * Height may be increased to six stories & 70 feet if podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to review and approval of the City Council. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxx�f M. ITIR 0 1� IN RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 11 3.03 The City Planner is directed to forward this resolution to the Metropolitan Council for review. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. City Clerk Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken )oeoi . des C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Residential Density for Mixed Use Areas Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that as a result of the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Lennar project, the Metropolitan Council requested that the City establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each District. Teague explained that Floor Area Ratio (FAR) alone cannot be used to determine densities. Teague presented a Resolution approving Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding residential density for mixed use areas and asked the Commissioners for their comments. Concluding, Teague reported that the Metropolitan Council is aware of the inconsistencies in the density ranges in Edina's Comprehensive Plan and that the City is actively working on a solution to amend the Plan to better reflect the intent. Discussion A discussion ensued acknowledging the need to amend the density ranges; noting currently in the City's most intense districts the density guidelines are less than that of the low density residential category. It was further discussed as the density guidelines are reviewed and amended there may be impact on current projects (Byerly's) and future projects (Grandview). Commissioners raised the following issues: • Are the proposed changes in the density guidelines for OR, MXC, RM and CAC high enough; or should they be increased • Consider not having a minimum instead of 12 -75 require 0 -75, etc.; noting that in some cities 0 is the starting point or there is no limit. Continuing it was observed in some of Edina's small commercial nodes where redevelopment could happen a proposal may work better with less residential units than the minimum would allow. It was also noted that having a minimum would encourage the development of housing. • It was suggested that a sentence be added above the Future Land Use Categories table that indicates "when residential development is proposed in a mixed use district, the residential density range shall apply, in addition to the FAR requirement. Residential development is not required in mixed use areas. Chair Staunton referred to correspondence from Scott Takenoff, Pentagon Revival and asked if anyone was present to speak to the issue, being none Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. The discussion continued with Commissioners noting that in 2015 the City will begin the Comprehensive Plan revision process and at that time more thought and time could be put into the decision making process on density guidelines. A number of Commissioners felt that amending the ranges at this time without more discussion wouldn't be prudent; acknowledging that any changes to the density ranges would have major development consequences. It was further suggested that the Commission consider acting on what was presented by staff. Chair Staunton commented after further thought he would agree that more discussion and thought is warranted in making density decisions and asked Planner Teague how he arrived at the density ranges proposed in the resolution. Planner Teague responded that he arrived at those numbers staying consistent with the City's already established high density residential range, and incorporating density ranges that are consistent with existing development within those districts. Commissioner Platteter said in his opinion that the suggested changes to increase density guidelines this evening are reasonable; however, he understands the feelings of other Commissioners that more thought and discussion on these changes needs to take place. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend approval of the proposed Resolution approving Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding residential density for mixed use areas, building height, floor area ratio and land use in its entirety as presented by-staff. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest asked for an amendment to the motion to be placed before the Future Land Use Categories table to read "when residential development is proposed in a mixed use district, the residential density range shall apply, in addition to the FAR requirement. Residential development is not required in mixed use areas. Commissioners Platteter and Scherer accepted that amendment. All voted aye; motion carried. w9t��r� o e In PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 11, 2014 VI.B. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description As a result of the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Lennar project at 6725 York Avenue, the Metropolitan Council has requested that the City of Edina establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each District. The text below is the description of Land Use Categories within the existing Edina Comprehensive Plan. Please note the highlighted areas in regard to density. Staff has incorrectly interpreted this so that FAR could determine density for mixed use areas. Met Council staff has informed city staff that specific density ranges must be used, and that the City of Edina's densities should be revised to reflect the existing descriptions for its districts. Floor area ratio alone cannot be used to determine densities within mixed use areas as suggested in the text of the Comprehensive Plan, and used in the City's Zoning Ordinance. A. Future Land Use Categories. Land uses are characterized primarily by range of densities or intensities. For residential uses, density is defined in terms of dwelling units per net acre (exclusive of road rights -of -way and public lands). For nonresidential and mixed uses, intensity is typically defined in terms of floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, which refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, a maximum FAR of 1.0 could allow for a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, and so on. Building heights are not specified in the table, because height will vary within and between categories, based on neighborhood context, infrastructure, and community design goals. (See the discussion later in this section.) As demonstrated in the attached pages Al — A6, from the Comprehensive Plan, the residential density ranges for Office Residential (OR), Mixed Use Center (MXC), Community Activity Center (CAC), (NC), Neighborhood Commercial and Regional Medical (RM) are from 1 -2 and 2 -3 units per acre. These densities are less than the City's Low Density Residential (LDR) district, which allows up to 5 units per acre. Densities from 1 -3 units per acre are not feasible for the intended mixed -use character or opportunity in these areas. The descriptions of these districts on pages A3 — A6, include "multifamily residential; vertical mixed use; serving areas larger than one neighborhood; the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage." Requiring densities less than the Low Density Residential (LDR) range does not encourage redevelopment with mixed uses in these areas; or reflect the types of redevelopment occurring in Edina and the Twin Cities. The Lennar project is located within the CAC district. By establishing new density ranges for these areas, the city would create the feasibility for mixed use projects. Changes to these density ranges would be accommodating growth that has been anticipated and planned for in the City's future population projections. The Met Council projection within the Comprehensive Plan was for 22,500 households in Edina by the year 2030. That would be an increase from the 2000 census number of households that was 20,996. Studies from traffic consultant WSB, and Barr Engineering on the attached pages A25 -A59 demonstrate that there is adequate sewer and roadway capacity to support the cities anticipated growth projections. Additionally, as with all redevelopment projects, these issues are also examined with each project individually to ensure adequate capacity. Floor area ratio would continue to limit density through the existing zoning ordinance requirements. Edina is a fully developed community; therefore, new development would be in the form of redevelopment, or in some instances additional structures within existing parking lots. Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City's Comprehensive Plans The attached pages A7- A24 provide information on the residential density ranges used by our surrounding cities. Please note that in general, these density ranges are higher than Edina. The City of Minnetonka does not have a residential density range established for its Mixed Use area. A summary is as follows: 2 city Range — Per Acre Bloomington Medium Density Residential 5 -10 High Density Residential No limit General Business 0 -83 Commercial Communi ty & Regional) 0 -83 High Intense mix use 0 -60 Airport South mix use 30 -131 Richfield Medium Density Residential 7 -12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 High Density Res. /Office Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park Medium Density Residential 6 -30 High Density Residential 20 -75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20 -75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20 -50 Minnetonka Medium Density Residential 4 -12 High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions See page A18. Minneapolis Medium Density mixed use 20 -50 High Density mixed use 50 -120 Very High Densi mixed use 120+ Districts for Consideration in Edina Suggested residential density ranges are demonstrated in the attached draft resolution, and discussed below. NC, Neighborhood Commercial. The Neighborhood Commercial district guides density at a range of 2 -3 units per acre. A density in that range would not encourage mixed use. The Planning Commission recommended a density range of 5 -12 units per acre, to be consistent with the Medium Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. W OR, Office Residential. The Office Residential district guides density at a range of 2 -3 units per acre in the current Comprehensive Plan. A suggested Office Residential density of 12 -30 units per acre would be consistent with the High Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. Pentagon Park is located within the OR district, therefore, if housing is desired within that area, this density range would have to be expanded to realize housing in that development. MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC, Mixed Use Center district guides density at a range of 1 -2 units per acre. These areas include 50th & France, Grandview and Centennial Lakes /Greater Southdale Area. A Mixed Use Center density of 12 -30 units would be consistent with High Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. This density range is consistent with existing densities in these areas, including 50th and France (23 units per acre) and 71 France in the Centennial Lakes /Greater Southdale area (24 units per acre). At the May 28 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended a new MXC -1 District be proposed for both of these areas with the 12 -30 units per acre range. The Grandview area would then be divided off separately into an MXC -2 district, and continue with the 1 -2 units per acre. Densities in this new MXC -2 district would then be studied furthered as part of the Grandview planning process. However, the Met Council has informed staff that creating a new district would be considered a major Comprehensive Plan amendment, and not be deemed administrative. Therefore, the Commission is asked to proceed with a recommendation in one of two ways. First, leave the MXC as is in its current range of 1 -2 units per acre and indicate to the Met Council that the City is still examining these areas in will come forward with a separate Comprehensive Plan Amendment; or second, amend the density to 12 -30 units per acre, and consider a separate amendment for just the Grandview District. CAC, Community Activity Center, The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The floor area ratio maximum in the CAC is 1.0. The existing density suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of 2 -3 units per acre would result in less density than the City's Low Density Residential area; which allows up to 5 units per acre. Density in that range would not encourage a mixture of land uses. A density range of 12 -75 units per acre in this area is reasonable given the description of this area is the city's most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Floor area ratio would continue to impact densities based on the Zoning Ordinance regulations. As compared to adjacent cities the maximum suggested for this district would still be less than surrounding cities and their most intense districts. The density proposed for the Lennar project is 52 units per acre. 4 RM, Regional Medical. Regional Medical is an area that allows senior housing, but does not have a specific range for density. This district was amended specifically for the senior housing project at 6500 France. That project would have a density of 76 units per acre. The current density is described as follows: Floor to Area Ratio — Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 1.0 for medical office uses. Density for senior housing shall be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. Based on the project at 6500 France, a density range of 12 -80 units /acre is recommended. The proposed densities using unit per acre are consistent with the existing descriptions of each land use category in the Comprehensive Plan; are consistent with existing development in Edina; and are consistent with the existing Edina Zoning Ordinance. The table on the following page demonstrates the densities of multi - family residential project in the City of Edina. High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 6500 France (Senior Housing) 6500 France 179 76 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 691h & York Apartments 3121 691h Street 114 30 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing on June 11, and forward a recommendation to the City Council, as they will hold a public hearing on June 17. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. R ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business�� ) 2008 Comprehensive Plan .... - . .. ... a9`r`41 Figure 4.3 4` a ''� City of Edina ;� Future Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS I —Lf-I-f—1 0 0.5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -25 54012 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Figure 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: U R S rrZr� 0 0.5 Mdes Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 1,i 4 -25 3 a u:- so of e ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business ��'q=� / 2008 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Categories. The categories in the table below apply to the Future Land Use Plan. It is important to note that land use categories are not zoning districts — they are broader and more long -term in scope. The land use plan and the zoning ordinance should be consistent with one another, but are not identical. Each land use category may be implemented through more than one zoning district, allowing for important differences in building height, bulk and coverage in different areas of the city. Some revisions to existing zoning districts or creation of new districts may ultimately be needed as part of the implementation of the land use plan. Land uses are characterized primarily by range of densities or intensities. For residential uses, density is defined in terms of dwelling units per net acre (exclusive of road rights -of -way and public lands). for nonresidential and-mixed7 uses, intensify isltypically definedin -terms of floor -to -area ratio, -fir FAR, which - refers to the ratio of -a- building's floor area to the size of -its lot. -Thus, a maximum FAR of 1.0 could allow for a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, and so on. Building heights are not specified in the table, because height will vary within and between categories, based on neighborhood context, infrastructure, and community design goals. (See the discussion later in this section.) The "Development Guidelines" in the table below are intended to highlight important design considerations for each land use category, but are not regulatory in nature. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design A2 • / Vie ..for living, learning, raising families & doing business` �� 2008 Comprehensive Plan Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories Residential Description, Land Uses Development Density Range Categories Guidelines LDR Applies to largely single- family Massing standards Low Density residential neighborhoods, (under development) 1 - 5 units /acre Residential encompassing a variety of lot and impervious Floor to Area sizes and street patterns (see coverage limitations Ratio: per "Character Districts" for more would apply to ensure current Zoning detail). Typically includes small compatibility of infill Code* institutional uses such as schools, construction. churches, neighborhood parks, etc. LDA Applies to two - family and Introduction of more Low - Density attached dwellings of low contemporary housing 4 - 8 units /acre Attached Residential densities and moderate heights. types, such as low - This category recognizes the density townhouses, Floor to Area historical role of these housing may be an Ratio: per types as transitional districts appropriate current Zoning between single- family residential replacement for two- Code* areas and major thoroughfares or family dwellings in commercial districts. May some locations, include single- family detached = provided that dwellings. adequate transitions to and buffering of adjacent dwellings can be achieved. MDR Applies to attached housing In new development Medium - Density townhouses quads, etc. and' (townhouses, q � ) or redevelopment, 5- 12 Residential multi - family complexes of improve integration of units /acre moderate density. multi - family housing May also include small into an Floor to Area institutional uses, parks and interconnected street Ratio: per open space network and work to current Zoning create an attractive, Code* pedestrian- friendly - street edge. HDR Existing "high- rise ". and other Provide incentives for High- Density concentrated multi - family updating older 12-30 Residential residential, some of which may multifamily buildings. units /acre contain a mixed use component. Work to create an May also include limited office, attractive, Floor to Area service or institutional uses pedestrian- friendly Ratio: per primarily to serve residents' street edge and current Zoning needs, parks and open space provide convenient Code* access to transit, schools, parks, and other community destinations. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design A `3 4 -27 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 1�` /$ 2008 Comprehensive Plan Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines Categories NC Small- to moderate -scale Building footprints Neighborhood commercial, serving primarily generally less than Floor to Area Commercial the adjacent neighborhood (s). 20,000 sq. ft. (or less Ratio -Per Current examples: Generally a `node' rather than a for individual current • or corridor.' Primary uses are storefronts). Parking Zoning Code: mede commercial core c retail and services, offices, is less prominent than maximum of studios, institutional uses. pedestrian features. 1.0* • Valley View and Residential uses permitted. Encourage structured 2- 3 Wooddale • 70th Ft Cahill Existing and potential parking and open units /acre neighborhood commercial space linkages where districts are identified for feasible; emphasize further study. enhancement of the pedestrian environment. OR Transitional areas along major Upgrade existing Office - Residential thoroughfares or between streetscape and Floor to Area No current examples higher- intensity districts and building appearance, Ratio -Per in City. Potential residential districts. Many improve pedestrian current examples include existing highway - oriented and transit Zoning Code: Pentagon Park area commercial areas are environment. maximum of and other 1 -494 anticipated to transition to this Encourage structured 0.5 to 1.0* corridor locations more mixed -use character. parking and open 2 - 3 Primary uses are offices, space linkages where units /acre attached or multifamily housing. feasible; emphasize Secondary uses: Limited retail the enhancement of and service uses (not including the pedestrian "big box" retail), limited environment. industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. 0 This designation allows for Provide Office professional and business offices, buffer/ transition to Floor to Area Current examples' generally where retail services adjacent residential Ratio - Per include the office do not occur within the uses. Use high quality Zoning Code: buildings on the west development unless they are permanent building Maximum of side of TH 100 accessory uses that serve the materials and on -site 0.5 between 70th and needs of office building tenants. landscaping. 77th Streets. Vehicle access requirements for Encourage structured office uses are high; however, parking. traffic generation from office buildings is limited to morning and evening peak hours during weekdays. Office uses should be located generally along arterial and collector streets. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design �' 4 -28 / • N ` ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business ��( /y° 2008 Comprehensive Plan Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines Categories MXC Established or emerging mixed Maintain existing, or Mixed -Use Center use districts serving areas larger create new, Floor to Area Current examples: than one neighborhood (and pedestrian and Ratio -Per • 50th and France beyond city boundaries). streetscape current Primary uses: Retail, office, amenities; encourage Zoning Code: • Grandview service, multifamily residential, or require structured maximum of institutional uses, parks and parking. Buildings 1.5 open space. "step down" in height 1 2 Vertical mixed use should be from intersections. units /acre encouraged, and may be 4 stories at 501h £t required on larger sites. France; 3 -6 stories at Grandview CAC The most intense district in Form -based design Community Activity terms of uses, height and standards for building Floor to Area Center coverage. placement, massing Ratio -Per Example: Greater Primary uses: Retail, office, and street -level current Southdale area (not lodging, entertainment and treatment. Zoning Code: including large multi- residential uses, combined or in Buildings should be maximum of family residential separate buildings. placed in appropriate 0.5 to 1.0* neighborhoods such Secondary uses: Institutional, proximity to streets to 2 - 3 as Centennial Lakes) recreational uses. create pedestrian units /acre . Mixed use should be encouraged, scale. �� Buildings "step and may be required on larger down at boundaries sites. with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. More stringent design standards for buildings > 5 stories. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer - grained circulation patterns where feasible. I Applies to existing predominantly Performance Industrial industrial areas within the City. standards to ensure Floor to Area Primary uses: industrial, compatibility with Ratio: Per manufacturing. Secondary uses: adjacent uses; Zoning ng Code: limited retail and service uses. screening of outdoor 0.5 activities. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -29 %a 91rr1rti -- -- - - - -- -` o e - �, -- ( ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business �`b 'r' ' �° 2008 Comprehensive Plan i Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines Categories RM Hospitals, medical and dental Form -based design Regional Medical offices and clinics, and standards for building Floor to Area laboratories for performing placement, massing Ratio - Per medical or dental research, and street -level current diagnostic testing, analytical or treatment. Zoning Code: clinical work, having a direct Pedestrian circulation maximum of relationship to the providing of and open space 1.0 health services. General office amenities should be uses are permitted. provided for larger sites. OSP Applies to major parks and Performance and N/A Open Space and protected open space that is buffering standards Parks publicly owned. May not include for intensive outdoor all small parks, since some are recreation, parking. included in residential land use districts. PSP Applies to schools, large Performance and To be Public /Semi- Public institutional uses (churches, buffering standards determined - cemeteries) and semi - public uses for intensive outdoor may require such as country clubs. Some recreation, parking. review of small uses of these types may be large -scale integrated into other land use development districts. or institutional expansion LAH Expressways and access ramps NA NA Limited Access for two regional arterial Highway highways (TH 62 and TH 100) occupy land within the City to serve local and regional travel needs. *Floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, an FAR of 1.0 could mean a two -story building covering 50% of the lot-, a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, etc. Potential Areas of Change Among its many purposes, the Comprehensive Plan functions as a long range tool that attempts to anticipate where change and growth will occur in the City. Identifying those potential areas of change is an initial stage in the process of guiding new construction and redevelopment when it is proposed by private property owners. It is not an attempt to stimulate change, but to acknowledge that it may occur and be proactive in shaping it. Locations identified in this section appear to be areas where change may occur during the life of this Plan. Many of these areas were identified in a group exercise at Public Meeting #2 as Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4 -30 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA Table 2.6 Guide Plan Designations, 2oo8 Comprehensive Plan Update Residential =r Designation Density Y. (Estimated Estimated Range in Percent Acres Min Max Low Density Residential 7,231 29.2 100 7,231 0 5 Medium Density Residential 710 2.9 100 710 5 10 • �hiA•3 0 High Density Residential 856 3.4 loo 848 10 No .,b�,$ql . limit Public 1,739 7.0 0 o NA NA ' Ouasi- Public 611 2.5 0 o NA NA 1 Conservation 4,746 19.2 0 o NA NA Water 2,000 8.1 0 o NA NA office (82) 675 2.8 0 0 0 60 Typical Airport South Mixed Use General Business (33) 167 0.7 0 0 0 83 Commercial Zoning Community Commercial (33) 281 1.1 0 0 0 83 Districts Regional Commercial (33) 201 0.8 0 0 0 83 High Intensity Mixed Use (ioo) 123 0.5 0 0 0 60 To help implement the community's vision, Bloomington Airport South Mixed Use (ioo) 88 0.4 3.4 3 30 131 has recently adopted twenty-first Industrial (30) 1,101 4.4 0 o NA NA century commercial zoning Right -of -Way 4,219 17.0 0 o NA NA districts. New features within the districts include: • Minimum intensity requirements. • Minimum building heights. • Maximum building setbacks. • High density residential uses allowed when vertically or horizontally integrated with commercial uses. • Design standards including window requirements, streetside entrance requirements, and anti -blank facade requirements. Rezoning of land to these new districts is currently underway. 2.18 LAND USE Note: No guide plan designation changes are proposed from the previous Comprehensive Plan as part of the 2008 update. Source: Bloomington Planning Division, 2oo8. k7 mNS� wnosr p6Mt1 iRiNff ��'; �•x tqz r�r��gg g3 $ .�� .q< <'t �" �`�'x � :- s•� s :'� g Se.:�es.. g�•r..�`. end '.Y xx�rgs Wi ��ar� sx,•,g���x•n 5F% � S BR�d€ ,1111115 €= ; €E € €€ CU$�$E �rA `$$$ "_ R$ �i � E as65 s n # Medium - Density ❑ General Hi h Intensity (5 - 10 DU /A) Quasi-Public ❑ ix y Business Mixed Use ■10h- Density (10+ DU /A) ■ Conservation ■ Community ❑ Airport South Mixed Use �) Commercial ( t� Land Use and 4 Comm unity Facilities 4 -18 Richfield Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential (MDR) The Medium Density Residential land use category was derived from the Single - family Residential —High Density category (R -SFH) that was included in the City's 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The medium density residential category replaces the R -SFH category. Naming this category medium density better clarifies the intent of the residential uses within this category. Medium density residential accommodates attached housing, predominantly townhomes or condominiums ranging from 7 to 12 units per acre. Medium density residential also includes manufactured housing. Medium - High Density Residential (MHD) Medium - High Density Residential includes multi- unit and multi - building developments. The intent is to allow for higher density housing, such as townhome developments. The allowed density would rangefrom 12 to 24 units per acre and no greater than 4 stories tall. High Density Residential (HDR) High Density Residential also includes multi -unit and multi - building developments at a more intense scale. The allowed density range is a minimum of 24 units eIp r�acrer. High Density Residential uses are pnmaMy located convenient to transportation, utility, security, shopping and social services in order to support higher concentrations of people. High Density Residential /Office (HDRO) The High Density Residential /Office category is similar to the High Density Residential category. The HDRO includes multi -unit and multi - building developments with the presence of office uses. Like the H DR category, a Vic minimum density of 24 units per acre is required. 4 Land Use and Community Facilities Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4 -19 Land Use and 4 Comm unityFacilities G 4 -22 Richfield Comprehensive Plan Regional Commercial /Office (RCO) In addition to the retail and service uses allowed in the Regional Commercial land use category, Regional Commercial /Office allows for the presence of offices. Within this category, office uses are to be integrated into the overall development with buildings exceeding 150,000 square feet in size. Office uses would preferably be located above retail uses or situated in stand -alone building developments. Mixed Use (MU) Mixed Use is anew land use category that is being used to better clarify planned land use patterns near 66th Street & Lyndale Avenue and the Penn Avenue corridor from 68th Street to Highway 62. Lyndale & 66th Street: The intent of the mixed use category is to focus on creating a city center in Richfield that would serve as a "downtown" The city center is expected to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and businesses uses. The area at 66th Street and Lyndale has been developing for the past decade as Richfield's city center. The intent is to continue the expansion of the city center area by incorporating residential housing at 50+ units per acre and providing commercial, office and recreational opportunities. Penn Avenue Corridor: The intent of the mixed use category is to create a traditional neighborhood center that is a vibrant, pedestrian- oriented district. The district would accommodate residential, shopping, recreational and businessesusesinaflexiblearrangementthatcaptures the spirit and intent of the Penn Avenue Revitalization Master Plan. Office (0) Office uses areaccommodated in several ofthe residential and commercial land use categories. However, the office land use category is intended to provide stand -alone office development. These stand -alone developments may include such usesasoffice- showrooms, research and developmentfacilities, real estate offices or banks. Afloor area ratio (FAR) of 0.20 should be achieved for stand - _ alone office building development. d Public and Quasi - Public Public and Quasi - public uses include all civic, county and state facilities (excluding parks); religious facilities, schools and other similar non -profit uses. Pa rk The park designation includes all public parks, public playgrounds and trail corridors. Right -of -Way Right -of -way includes all public land that is under the jurisdiction of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County or the State of Minnesota that is generally devoted to transportation and /or utilities. 4 Land Use and Comm unityFacilities Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4 -23 Figure 4.8 2030 Future Land Use Plan a oz 4 Land Use and CommunityFacilities __ _ 3•• _- �E 9 = jinn E. INS ZZ Sa 99 ES C�Wp= IlplpplUppl --- 2 3 SIp11� " IIIIIH IIgIHIC c� iC i a is N nlu'mq 3a -s 6__C - :ul p mm li t ie °nu e z _ - AN m Ip/uu IDI - SIC OC O Iggllll X11 - �� S2 ■ C �� 11� a nE BE � G�EMS�: E 1111 I i ' f cTTFr _ Regional Commercial - Neighborhood Commercial - Medium -High Density Res - Park updated 812012 N ® Regional Commercial /Office Office O Medium Density Res - Institutional ^ OComm Commercial - High Density Res Low Density Res Open Water N �l Comm Commercial /Office ® High Density Res /Office - Mixed Use Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4 -15 Public Land It is estimated that public land comprises more than 40% of the land within the city's boundaries. Publicly owned land includes streets, sidewalks, alleys, parks, playgrounds, trails, public institutions (e.g. City Hall, schools, and the community centers), public facilities, and some natural open spaces. These publicly owned spaces are used in a multitude of ways. The City's goal is to facilitate the best use of public land to enhance the amenities available to residents, access to public land and buildings, and mobility. Public land can be categorized into the following use types: • Public right -of -way, which includes streets, sidewalks, boulevards, trails, and alleys; • Parks, playgrounds, and open spaces; • Park Commons "town center" and other public places that define the community's identity; • Public and quasi - public institutions, which includes city buildings, schools, churches, and community centers; • Public facilities. Where We Are Headed This section of the Land Use chapter establishes the City's official land use categories and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, which is intended to guide current and future land use planning and development through the year 2030. The land use plan categories are fully defined below. The 2030 map is the official land use designation map for the City. The land use designations are intended to shape the character, type and density of future development according to sound planning principles. Any new development, redevelopment, change in land use, or change in zoning is required to be consistent with the land use guiding for each parcel. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories There are 12 land use categories that guide the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, which are described below. In general, the categories reflect a movement towards greater mixing of uses. I. RL - Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential category is intended primarily for single - family detached housing. This category allows net idential densities from three (3) to seven (7) units per acre. RM - Medium Density Residential e Medium Density Residential category allows net idential densities from six (6) to 30 units per acre. This egory allows for a variety of housing types including single - ❑ily detached, duplexes, townhomes, and small two- and ee -story apartment buildings. RH - High Density Residential High Density Residential land use category is intended higher density, compact urban residential development, luding high -rise apartment buildings. This category allows a net residential density range of 20 to 75 units per acre; vever zoning will allow only up to 50 units per acre except utilizing the PUD process. Under a PUD, 75 units per e may be developed if within 1,000 feet of a park. The rropriate building height will vary by development and Apa fflSt. Louis Park MINNESOTA depend upon the characteristics of the development and its V. MX — Mixed -Use surroundings. Pedestrian - scale, three- to four -story buildi n the Mixed Use land use category, a mixing of uses including will be appropriate in some areas, while six to eight -story commercial is required for every development parcel. The buildings and even taller high -rises will be acceptable in goal of this category is to create pedestrian -scale mixed -use others. In addition to residential development, a small buildings, typically with a portion of retail, service or other proportion of supportive retail and service is also appropriate. commercial uses on the ground floor and residential or office Retail, service and office beyond those supporting the uses on upper floors. Mixed use buildings typically have residential development would only be permitted as part of a approximately 75 to 85 percent of the building for residential mixed -use PUD. use and 20 to 25 percent for commerical or office uses. Taller IV. C - Commercial The Commercial land use category is intended to accommodate a wide range and scale of commercial uses, such as retail, service, entertainment, and office. Commercial uses can range from small neighborhood convenience nodes, to community retail areas along major roadways, to large shopping centers, to auto - related commercial uses along freeways. Residential uses are also appropriate as part of a mixed -use commercial development, with a net residential density range of 20 to 50 units per acre allowed. buildings may be appropriate in some areas and net residential densities between 20 and 75 units per acre are allowed. The MX designation is intended to facilitate an integrated town center atmosphere in Park Commons and a diversity of uses in certain other areas of the community. VI. I -Industrial The Industrial land use category covers all industrial uses from manufacturing, assembly, processing, warehousing, storage, laboratory, distribution, and related offices. Industrial areas consist of both lighter industrial uses, which tend to have higher appearance standards and fewer impacts on surrounding properties, and general industrial uses which are typically set off from other uses. Current industrial uses tend to be concentrated around the City's railroads, where industrial uses first developed in the community. Future industrial uses should primarily be located in close proximity to either a railroad line or regional roadway system with limited traffic circulation through residential and pedestrian - oriented areas. VII. 0 -Office The Office land use category is primarily intended for employment centers of fairly intensive office and mixed use development with high floor area ratios (FARs) and building heights. Business, professional, administrative, scientific, technical, research, and development services are typical uses appropriate for the Office land use category. The Office category also allows other limited uses such as hotels, parking ramps, residential, day care, retail and restaurants when part of a larger development. AP3 Iff St. Louis Park MINNESOTA City of mumetonka Where quality is our nature Land Use Catagory Low Density Residential (2 • 4 units per acre) Medium Density Residential (5 to 12 units per acre) High Density Residential -' (over 12 units per acre) 1 Commercial _ Service Commercial Office L 1 Mixed Use Industrial Institutional Open Space _ Parks Wetlands N - Lakes w e s 0 2,050 4,100 8,200 Feet Figure IV -15 2030 Land Use Plan Sm R: City of Minnetonka Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan B -1 Office and accessory services uses but Floor to Area Ratio: 1.0 max excludes general retail and service Office Business District uses. Low intensity, service oriented B -2 commercial uses in areas designated as Floor to Area Ratio: 0.8 max Limited Business District neighborhood or community centers in the comprehensive plan. B_3 General commercial development in Floor to Area Ratio: 1.5 max areas so designated in the General Business District comprehensive plan. Low intensity, service oriented I 1 commercial uses in areas designated as Floor to Area Ratio: 0.8 max Industrial District neighborhood or community centers in the comprehensive plan. Floor to Area Ratios (max.): Low- Medium Density Res : 0.5 Uses permitted in all districts are High Density Res : 1.0 allowed Planned Unit Office: 1.0 Development District Commercial neighborhood or community: 0.8 Commercial regional: 1.5 Industrial: 1.0 city, y. 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan mm netonka k J zL- Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan Appendix IV -D Land Use Category Comparison to Zoning Ordinance Districts Existing Zoning Map (Please Refer to Appendix IV -D) Existing Zoning Districts Zoning District Purpose Key District Standards Single family detached dwellings in areas where such development is consistent with the low density R-1 residential designation of the Lot Area Minimum: Low Density Residential comprehensive plan and compatible 22,000 square feet District with surrounding land use characteristics. Development shall occur at densities not exceeding 4 dwelling units per acre. Single family and two family dwellings in those areas where such development is consistent with the low density Single family Lot Area Minimum: R-2 residential designation of the 15,000 square feet Low Density Residential comprehensive plan and compatible Two family Lot Area Minimum: District with surrounding land uses. 12,500 square feet Development shall occur at densities not exceeding 4 dwelling units per acre. Attached residential dwelling units in Low density lot area minimum: those areas where such development is 10,000 square feet per dwelling consistent with the low or medium Medium density lot area density residential designation of the minimum: 3,630 square feet R -3 comprehensive plan and compatible Low or Medium Density with the development pattern of the Residential District surrounding area. Clustering of buildings to permit more orderly development is encouraged within the district. Development densities shall not exceed 12 dwelling units per acre. Attached and multiple family dwellings R -4 in those areas designated for medium density residential development in the Floor to Area Ratio: 0.5 max Medium Density comprehensive plan. Development Height: regulated by the FAR Residential District densities shall occur at least 4 but not exceed 12 dwelling units per acre. Multiple family dwellings designated R -5 for high density residential development in the comprehensive Floor to Area Ratio: 1.0 max High Density Residential plan. Development densities shall Height: regulated by the FAR District occur at least 12 dwelling units per acre. min ie tonka hL a1 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan 2030 Land Use Map The future land use pattern for Minnetonka over the next 20 years is presented in the city's 2030 Land Use Map as Figure IV -15 and listed in Table IV -2 below. Consistent with the city's overall concept for development, the established patterns of existing single- family neighborhoods and commercial /business areas linked by roadway corridors, such as Highway 7, 1 -394 and 1 -494, will be reinforced so they continue to reflect the patterns that have evolved in Minnetonka over the last 20 years. Table IV -2 2030 Land Uses Land Use Category Gross Acres Percentage Net Acres Percentage Low Density Residential (2 to 4 /units per acre) 9,039 50.0% 8,133 45.0% Medium Density Residential (4.1 to 12 units /acre) 619 3.4% 547 3.0% High Density Residential (over 12 nits /acre) 330 1.8% 282 1.6% Commercial 344 1.9% 292 1.6% Service Commercial 42 0.2% 35 0.2% Office 283 1.6% 253 1.4% Industrial 200 1.1% 188 1.0% Mixed 994 5.5% 974 5.4% Institutional 763 4.2% 655 3.6% Open Space 1017 5.6% 376 2.1% Park 937 5.1% 587 3.3% Right of Way (including railroads, 3,073 17.0% 3073 17.0% roads and Co. LRT trail) Water 664 3.7% 664 3.7% Wetlands /Floodplain 2,073 11.3% Total 18,066 100.00% I 18,066 100.00% Source: City of Minnetonka Specific parcels for land use change from the previous 2020 land use plan map were identified based on opportunities for growth along key corridors, at regional centers, or in some cases, at several sites with specific village areas. The principal objective of these changes is to increase housing choice and provide additional housing opportunities, vibrancy and positive business activity at locations that support additional development intensity. The areas of change are shown in the Appendix IV -B on the Land Use Change Sites map and table, which indicates primary land use changes and potential residential units from the 2020 land use map as amended through 2007. Appendix IV -B also contains the 2020 land use plan map and table of 2020 land uses. Appendix IV -E shows future planned land use in 5 -year stages. nnetonka IV -41 Aar 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan C. Mixed Uses Where a Single Land Use May Ultimately Be Developed These locations are where more than one land use is considered appropriate and feasible, but only a single land use will ultimately be developed. Decisions regarding the ultimate land use will depend upon a specific development's ability to meet certain criteria defined in this plan. For example, an area may be designated for either office or high - density residential purposes. Ultimately, however, office uses may only be allowed if commensurate transportation improvements are made to a nearby roadway. 4. Public and Semi - Public Land Uses A. Institutional This district accommodates public and semi - public land uses including schools, religious institutions, government buildings, and multi - purpose complexes like the Civic Center. B. Parks and open space Parks and open space are designated separately to distinguish between the city's officially designated parks and those protected open space areas that are not included in them, although they may be city- owned. The open space district includes protected open space by public ownership, easement or other protection method. C. Roadway rights -of -way Includes public or private vehicular, transit and /or pedestrian rights -of -way. These areas may be reserved for future use as a transportation route, and thus undeveloped. D. Utility Includes land devoted to public or private land occupied by a substation, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, water tower, municipal well, reservoir, pumping station, water treatment facility, communications tower, or similar use. E. Railroad Public or private freight or passenger rail activities. 5. Water Resources A. Lakes Includes actual water bodies greater than six feet in depth (such as Gray's Bay and smaller lakes), and creeks. B. Wetlands Includes areas designated by the city's wetland protection program and maps. The actual areas have been field mapped but must be delineated as part of the development review process. C. Floodplains Includes locations delineated on the city's and FEMA maps and sometimes overlap water bodies and wetlands. Similar to wetlands, actual field delineation is required for development projects. ,�' IV -40 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan are typically associated with regional centers and within business concentration areas. Typical developments include hotels, health clubs, religious institutions and similar service uses. Uses are typically characterized by lower peak hour traffic generation characteristics, making them suitable for high- volume interchange areas. Certain service commercial areas serve as transitions between residential areas and retail uses. C. Commercial The commercial district is broad and includes retail, entertainment, service and office uses that typically occur in the village and regional areas. D. Industrial A range of "light" industrial uses including warehouse, showroom, manufacturing and limited office, retail and service uses fall within the industrial district. Many other industrial uses are part of mixed -use areas. These include business parks, where master plans govern more specific uses and development criteria, such as Opus and Carlson Center, as well as other areas close to TH 62 and 1 -494. 3. Mixed Use Areas Areas include locations where one or more uses can be accommodated within a single building or within a planned multi - building area. This designation has been established to allow flexibility in land use and creative site design, especially in the village and regional areas. Generally, most mixed use areas should be designed to allow the incorporation of appropriate natural resource protection and /or enhancement techniques. The general land uses determined appropriate for the mixed land use area are shown on the 2030 land use plan map. For most mixed -use areas or buildings, the use and design of property is governed by a master plan that defines specific land uses, relationships between uses and overall design. The following describes the mixed use areas in the city: A. Mixed Use Areas with Residential Areas planned for a mix of residential and commercial /retail uses should be designed to include a residential character, within specific mixed use buildings or within a compact village area. Buffering and transitions, as well as careful consideration of noise and light impacts, are important to the viability of such mixed use areas, since they include higher density and more activity than exclusive medium or high density neighborhoods. Site design and access to pedestrian friendly open space and parks is important in mixed use areas that include a residential component. Accessibility and convenient parking as well as streetscape enhancements in public and private areas are valued features for residents choosing to live in mixed use areas. A range of densities and building heights is anticipated, depending on the specific location an con itions. B. Non - Residential Mixed Use Areas Areas with a mix of commercial (office, service commercial, or retail) and industrial uses rely on mobility and access to transportation systems as key to business operations (e.g., loading and deliveries). Other urban design treatments should be included in the overall site design such as cohesive signage and landscaping that contribute to the character of the area. � a r. IV -39 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan w1 N, Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan Environmental features such as wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, and heavily vegetated areas should be used, as available, as buffers. Developments should incorporate appropriate transitions, such as landscaping and other land use or design features between non - residential and residential uses of a lower density. . High- density residential: residential developments with densities above 12 units per acre. Typical high density residential development consists of apartment or condominium units in multistory buildings. The intent of this district is to provide the opportunities for residential developments that: • serve a wide range of income group and changing lifestyles; • are in close proximity to services, employment centers and transportation corridors, especially transit routes; and • broaden housing choice, especially with an increasingly aging population and accommodate housing goals, including affordable and mid - priced housing. As is the case with medium - density residential development, development within high - density residential areas should incorporate: 1. Design techniques that facilitate natural resource protection and open space preservation, and buffers and /or transitions between more intense land uses and low - density areas. 2. Buffers and /or transitions between more intense land uses and lower density areas. Environmental features such as wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, and heavily vegetated areas should be incorporated, as available, within buffers. Developments should incorporate appropriate transitions, such as landscaping and other land use or design features between non - residential and lower density residential uses. High- density residential development projects should occur in a planned manner, with specific consideration given to all uses within an area and also to impacts on adjacent developments, services and transportation. Development will not be encouraged to occur until appropriate services and infrastructure are available or programmed. 2. Business Land Use Districts Business land uses typically include categories of uses that are measured by the intensity of development and off -site impacts. These uses are found in the village areas, regional areas and corridors of the city. Additionally, business land use districts apply to several planned corporate campuses such as the Cargill and Welsch developments in the city. The following describe the categories of business uses in the city. A. Office The office land use district provides locations for administrative, executive, professional or other offices and related service uses, such as financial institutions, lodging, day care and similar uses. It is not intended for retail uses that serve the general public. The office designation can be used, if designed appropriately, as a transitional use between residential and more intense commercial districts. B. Service commercial The service commercial land use district is a land use district used in the 1 -394 Corridor and other specific areas. It is considered a tool that increases flexibility in siting uses that J tmiilnetonka IV -38 411 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan The density definitions are expressed in terms of ranges to allow for development flexibility and compatibility with natural resource and other site specific characteristics of property. Therefore, an appropriate density for a particular use may be at the lower end of the density range rather than the higher end. Further, the density definitions do not specify the type of housing; rather, the zoning ordinance specifies the type of housing and specific standards that must be met by a particular development. The decision regarding the specific density for a particular property is made during the development review process, where the following conditions are considered by the city: • The existing environmental conditions of the property including wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes and the quality of existing vegetation; • the specific site plan including the type of housing units proposed and requirements for development facilities such as stormwater ponding, municipal sewer and water, etc.; • the existing and requested zoning classification for the property; and • the surrounding neighborhood characteristics. A. Low - density residential: development that ranges in density from two to four dwelling units per acre. Most residential neighborhoods that contain existing single- family homes in the city are designated for low - density residential uses. Although low - density uses include detached single family housing types other residential housing types such as duplexes and attached townhomes are included provided that the overall density does not exceed four units per acre. This land use district is established to recognize the primary residential development pattern in the city and accommodate housing goals, including affordable and mid - priced housing. B. Medium - density residential: residential density ranges from more than four to 12 units per acre. Typically, this land use district includes attached housing types such as small -lot single family developments ( "zero lot line "), duplexes, townhouses, "quads," and low -rise multiple family buildings. This land use designation is used to: • Encourage and allow the opportunity for residential project design techniques that incorporate natural resource protection and open space preservation techniques such as "clustering ". • Create appropriate transitions between different and more intense land uses and low - density areas. • Encourage opportunities for residential development near and within village and regional centers, employment centers or major transportation corridors. • Broaden housing choice, especially with an increasingly aging population and accommodate housing goals, including affordable and mid - priced housing Development within medium - density residential areas should incorporate: 1. Design techniques that facilitate natural resource protection and open space preservation;, and 2. Buffers and /or transitions between more intense land uses and low - density areas. IV 37 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan ,miunerorika / l� Chapter IV. 2030 Land Use Plan Section F Land Use Plan Implementation The following land use implementation section describes the methods that the City of Minnetonka will utilize to initiate the implementation of the Minnetonka 2030 Vision according to the planning strategies for the growth strategy themes listed in Section B of this chapter. The implementation methods also consider the conditions and policies established in the other chapters of the 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan. This section establishes the land use categories and review criteria to guide private and public decisions regarding development and redevelopment in accordance with the targeted planning areas (residential neighborhoods, villages, regional areas/ corridors, and transportation /natural area corridors) within the city. The implementation methods include: * the 2030 land use definitions; * the 2030 land use plan map; * the 2030 population, household and employment forecasts; * the overall development review criteria, including those established in Sections C and D of this chapter, to determine consistency of development and redevelopment projects with the land use plan; and * implementation procedures that include city regulations (the zoning and subdivision ordinances) and specific 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment criteria that pertain primarily to the land use chapter text and 2030 land use map. 2030 Land Use Definitions The land use districts should not be confused with the zoning designations of property. The land use districts describe general land uses and may include other criteria to be considered when development and redevelopment projects are reviewed by the city to ensure that the project meets the 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan policies and the appropriate policies and strategies of other chapters of the plan. The corresponding zoning designation and associated performance standards describe specific criteria that must be met before development can occur on property. The city's land use definitions follow, according to the general land use category. Appendix IV -A of this chapter provides illustrative examples of the specific types of uses found within each land use category. 1. Residential Land Use Districts Prior to 1979, the medium- and high- density residential definitions restricted densities to five to eight, and nine to 12 units per acre, respectively. The definitions were changed, as part of a comprehensive planning effort, to allow a greater density to provide more opportunities for housing choice (variety and cost), recognition of the rising cost of land in Minnetonka, and to bring the density standards more in conformance with other metropolitan area communities and Metropolitan Council policies. IV -36 2030 Comprehensive, Guide Plan W ' 2030 Comprehensi ve Plan Land Use Map i i � It `•I � �•.Lnu�uuuuv •�� Catepries RL. - Lm Deruity Residential Q RM - Medinn Density RERial Q RH - High Density RVA&MMI ® Mx - Mixed use ® cam - Canuneroal I140 - Industrial D 0.5 ® O;FC - offdu BP - Bminess Park Q W - Civic ® PRK - Park and Open Space RUW - Right of Y&y ® RRR - Ratlraed i. }. i A(L� f'St. Louis Park MINNESOTA MPLS PLA A GUIDE TO Residential Densities from The Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth This guide offers sample building types and ideal locations of urban residential densities; examples from Minneapolis are provided. Located in: I Located in: Community Corridors and areas not designated as Land Community Corridors, Neighborhood Commercial Nodes, Use Features Commercial Corridors, Activity Centers, Growth Centers, Transit Station Areas Total Units: 1 Units /Acre: < Stories: 1- Zoning: R Total Units: 2 Units /Acre: 4 -8 Stories: 1 -2.5 Zoning: R2, 11213 Located in: Community Corridors, Neighborhood Commercial Nodes, Commercial Corridors Total Units: 4 -12 Units /Acre: 17 -35 Stories: 2-4 Zoning: R3, R4 ter►' City of Minneapolis C-10Y P1 -.--96 MORE INFORMATION Total Units: 8 -24 Units /Acre: 35 -62 Stories: 3 -4 Zoning: R4, C1 ter►' City of Minneapolis C-10Y P1 -.--96 MORE INFORMATION ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS Rt, RiA: Single Family R2, R2B: Two Family R3, R4, R5, 116: Multiple Family ORt: Neighborhood Office Residence OR2: High Density Office Residence OR3: Institutional Office Residence Cu Neighborhood Commercial C2: Neighborhood Corridor Commercial C3A: Community Activity Center C3S: Community Shopping Center 134: Downtown Business B4N: Downtown Neighborhood B4S: Downtown Service B4C: Downtown Commercial Ilt the Land Use Chapter of The Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth online at: //www.minneapolismn.gov /CPED /comp_plan_2030.asp Aat rev i4oft Total Units: 4 -40 Units /Acre: 35 -62 Stories: 2 -4 Zoning: R4, R5, C1, C2, OR2 ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS Rt, RiA: Single Family R2, R2B: Two Family R3, R4, R5, 116: Multiple Family ORt: Neighborhood Office Residence OR2: High Density Office Residence OR3: Institutional Office Residence Cu Neighborhood Commercial C2: Neighborhood Corridor Commercial C3A: Community Activity Center C3S: Community Shopping Center 134: Downtown Business B4N: Downtown Neighborhood B4S: Downtown Service B4C: Downtown Commercial Ilt the Land Use Chapter of The Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth online at: //www.minneapolismn.gov /CPED /comp_plan_2030.asp Aat rev i4oft Cary Teague From: Ross Bintner Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 2:32 PM To: Cary Teague; Chad Millner Subject: RE: Meeting at Met Council - Mike Larson Yes. There is plenty of capacity at the regional scale. Local scale capacity is available, but limited. We will need to enact some of the capacity increases foreseen in Chapter 8 of the comp plan in the next 5 -10 years. LL- 130 727 BARR.SE Edina - .SACAva.,. From: Cary Teague Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 2:28 PM To: Ross Bintner; Chad Millner Subject: RE: Meeting at Met Council - Mike Larson Thanks Ross ... yes, could you provide the local capacity too? I assume that this tells us there is plenty of capacity? Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 cteagueCa,EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ross Bintner Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 2:22 PM To: Cary Teague; Chad Millner Subject: RE: Meeting at Met Council - Mike Larson Cary, I have a call in to Kyle Colvin today to talk about the process to certify capacity in the 1 -RF -491 and 1- RF- 491(R) MCES interceptors. He has a good understanding of flow capacity and the planning that went into this area. I also have a flow and capacity question in to Anna Bessel with his staff. No reply yet. Here's what I've been able to stitch together from City of Edina and public records: MCES projected the need for 19.65 MGD peak capacity in 2030 for the 1 -RF -491 line, and the line had existing peak flows of around 13 MGD. The 1 -RF -491 line was conceived and built between 2007 and 2011, and was planned to add an additional 9 MGD to the peak flow capacity in the area. See sections 6.C, 18 of attached EAW. See attached map for 1 -RF -491 and 1- RF- 491(R) location. 1 Aa5. The EAW also describes the treatment capacity, saying that MCES has capacity to treat flow from the new line. Would you also like information on local capacity? We have that. << File: 1 -RF -491 Relief Interceptor EAW.pdf>> << File: MCES Richfield - Bloomington -Edina Interceptor Map.pdf>> From: Cary Teague Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:30 PM To: Chad Millner Cc: Ross Bintner Subject: RE: Meeting at Met Council - Mike Larson Ok ... no problem... if there is anything that you can give me that talks about the sewer capacity in the area, and that we have enough capacity to support the increase in housing units in the Southdale area in exchange for less office /retail space that would be most helpful!! Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 cteagueAEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Appointment---- - From: Chad Millner Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 7:36 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Ross Bintner ;ubject: Declined: Meeting at Met Council - Mike Larson When: Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00 PM -2:30 PM (UTC- 06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: Met Council Sorry Cary. I'm unavailable. Both Ross and I are out. Is there anything specific you think you need from us concerning the sanitary prior to this meeting? resourceful. naturally. BARR engineering and environmental consultants Memorandum To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 c: Ross Bintner Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an analysis of available sewer capacity in southeast Edina. Previous work related to the City's Comprehensive Plan completed in 2008 included the use of a computer -based sanitary sewer system model, which identified some trunk lines in this area as having limited sewer capacity remaining. The sanitary sewer model was created in 2006 as a part of an effort to reduce inflow and infiltration to the sanitary sewer. For this work the model was updated to allow for analysis of available capacity at the individual pipe scale. This information was then used (a) to determine individual pipes and pipe sections in the southeast area of Edina which may be nearing capacity; and (b) to advise a summary of future work, including where targeted metering should be conducted in the future to improve the accuracy of analysis of potential capacity issues Project Area The area analyzed for this project is generally bounded on the south and east by the city limits, on the north by Crosstown, and on the west by Valley View Road extended south to 494. Pipes outside this area are also known to have limited capacity; however, they are not the focus of this effort. The trunk sewers in this area carry over half of the total sanitary flow for the City. Background Since the completion of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the City has regularly asked Barr to look at requests by developers and manufacturers to add flow to the sanitary sewer system. At times the added flow has come as a result of expanded manufacturing, and at other times it has been a result of redevelopment where an existing site -use is modified and results in a higher - density development and added flow to the sanitary system, such as the Westin next to the Galleria. For each of these cases, a new flow is projected for the sanitary sewer and added to the model at the proposed location. Pipe capacities downstream of that location are then checked to see if the added flow can be handled by the system. Most Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com A .1-7 To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 2 c: Ross Bintner of the development has occurred in the southern part of Edina where the existing sanitary sewer system is known to be at or very near capacity. Some of the proposed developments were built while others remain in planning stages. Accordingly, not all of the flows from the proposed developments that were checked have been left in the model, as some were not constructed. As redevelopment pressure continues to rise for this part of Edina, the City is interested in a more comprehensive review of the remaining sanitary sewer capacity which addresses multiple redevelopment requests in a systematic, cumulative manner, rather than one at a time. This memo is part of the more comprehensive review and provides the City with a simple tool to help estimate if a proposed development will exceed remaining sanitary sewer capacity. Each time a new development is proposed, a quick look at the tables in this memo will provide an estimated amount of remaining capacity in the sewers downstream of the site. It is recommended that the model be updated and the tables be regenerated each time a major new development is approved and on a regular basis after smaller developments are approved. This will result in new tables that, again, can be quickly referenced when the next development is proposed. New developments are often characterized as generating a certain number of SAC (sewer availability charge) units of flow. This is a unit used by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). One SAC unit equals 274 gallons per day of sewer flow. This unit of flow, along with gallons per minute will be the main units used in the following analysis. Modeling The existing City of Edina XP -SWMM sanitary sewer model (model) was used as a base for the updated analysis of SAC availability in Southeast Edina. The existing model, developed in 2006, accounts for all inflows into the sanitary sewer based on 2005 winter quarter water sales. Sewer infiltration, determined from city-wide metering efforts during model construction in 2006, was also accounted for by incorporating pipe infiltration rates into the post - modeling results. Since the creation of the existing model, Barr has analyzed a number of developments. At the direction of the City, four have been included in the model so that their projected flows are accounted for in the analysis of remaining sewer capacity. These include: • The Westin (now constructed and in use) • Byerly's proposed redevelopment (in planning stages) • The Southdale Apartments (in planning stages) • Edina Medical Plaza (in planning stages) \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina\SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 3 c: Ross Bintner Estimated sanitary sewer flow from each of the four developments, shown in Table 1, was added to the model for this updated analysis. It should be noted that this additional flow makes up much of the future flow assumed in Scenario 1 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary sewer flow estimates for the Westin were based on water billing data from the development over a 3 -year period. The flows are lower than those originally evaluated. The occupancy of this Westin over this period was not known, so it is possible that flow from this development could change based on future occupancy trends. To determine available pipe capacity at the individual -pipe scale, the theoretical capacity of each pipe in question was calculated using the pipe materials, slope, and dimensions. This capacity was then compared to the estimated expected peak flow at each pipe under current model conditions with the four added properties. The current model conditions represent base flow conditions using winter quarter water use from 2005 and infiltration rates estimated from the metering work done at the time of model creation in 2006. Note that this does not account for known flow reductions that have occurred since 2006 as a result of the changing business climate and addition of flow reducing water fixtures. It also does not account for the reduction in infiltration that may have occurred as the City improves its sanitary sewer collection system and repairs known leaky pipes. This means that calculations of available capacity should be conservative unless some water use has increased since the model was created. Mean flow in each pipe was then calculated using the model. Infiltration for each pipe was also estimated based on meter results from the time the model was constructed. With the infiltration and mean sanitary flow rate at each pipe segment calculated, individual pipe capacity was determined using the following equation: = 100% Pipe Capacity ( %) Infiltration Rate + Mean Flow * Peaking Factor Theoretical Maximum Pipe Capacity Where Infiltration Rate is the cumulative upstream infiltration flow rate at a pipe segment, Mean Flow is the average flow rate predicted by the model at a pipe segment, Peaking Factor is the MCES Flow Variation Factor based on the value of mean flow which includes an allowance for inflow, and Theoretical Maximum Pipe Capacity is the maximum pipe capacity predicted by the Manning's equation. Percent pipe capacity and all related variables are summarized in Table 2. SAC availability was determined as the difference between total peak pipe flow (Infiltration Rate + Mean Flow * Peaking Factor) and the theoretical maximum pipe capacity. SAC availability at each pipe segment is shown in Table 3. \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 4 c: Ross Bintner Results Figure 1 shows the capacity of all pipe segments in the Southeast Edina sanitary sewer. Under current modeling conditions, there are 11 individual pipe segments that are predicted to be over 100 - percent capacity during a peak inflow event. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the pipe identification numbers (Pipe IDs) corresponding to the Pipe IDs referenced in Table 2 and Table 3. Without additional data these pipes should already be considered to be at full capacity. As can be seen, all of the pipe segments at capacity are along the trunk sanitary sewer line heading east along 72nd St. W. towards France Ave S. Once this east -west trunk joins with the trunk going south along France Ave. S., the pipe is no longer over capacity but remains very close to full capacity. Percent capacity along this sewer line remains high until the terminal connection with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Interceptor, MCES -129. Because the majority of sanitary flows from developments in Edina ultimately reach the MCES -129 interceptor via these trunk lines, requests for additional SAC units flowing to these pipes should be carefully planned to make sure there is sufficient available capacity. 2012 Sanitary Flow Metering Efforts As part of the FilmTec Flow Analysis Study, completed by Barr Engineering Co. for the City of Edina in December of 2012, sanitary flow data was collected at several locations throughout the city, including the MCES -129 Interceptor. As described in the modeling section of this memorandum, the model used in this analysis was developed and calibrated based on 2005 winter quarter water sales and city-wide metering efforts conducted in 2006. Included in the attached addendum is a comparison of modeled flow and observed flow form the 2006 and 2012 studies. As can be seen, the model accurately predicts observed flow in the 2006 study, but appears to over - predict flow based on metering efforts in 2012. There are many factors which may be responsible for the model over - predicting flow during the metered period in December of 2012. Infiltration and Inflow rates used in the model are based on the metering efforts conducted in 2006. Since then, the City of Edina has taken efforts to reduce I &I by replacing manhole covers and lining some pipes. From work done recently in other areas of the city we also know that it is likely that base -line sewer flows have decreased to some extent. Additionally, the fall season of 2012 was exceptionally dry, potentially leading to lower than expected infiltration when metering efforts were conducted in December of that year. One, all, or a combination of these factors could have led to the over - prediction of total sanitary flow in 2012. \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability \Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 5 c: Ross Bintner Conclusions and Recommendations The sanitary sewer bmnkline from 72 °d St, W, to France Ave, S„ currently modeled as being over capacity, drains a relatively small portion of the project area. Most of the flow contributing to it is pumped in from Lift Station 6 (LS -6) and comes from southwest Edina. Once it joins to trunk lines draining with flow from southeast Edina it is no longer over capacity, however, it remains at over 80% capacity. For this reason, it is possible for development to continue in most areas of southeast Edina. However, because the major trunk lines leading to MCES -129 are nearing capacity, it is recommended that the City evaluate requests for additional SAC units on a case -by -case basis. With most of the major trunk lines immediately upstream of MCES -129 being close to capacity, it is recommended that the City also start looking into reliever trunk lines to accommodate proposed development in this area. New trunk lines running down York Ave. S. and a reliever line carrying flow from LS -6 all the way to the MCES interceptor could free up significant capacity to support additional development. Before any major trunk line upgrade decisions are made, it is recommended that updated field metering data be collected and compared to the data collected in 2006 for the creation of the model. Due to I &I reduction efforts completed since 2006 and potential decreases in base -line sewer flow, it is possible that capacity issues could be less severe than indicated by current modeling results. Even without fully updating the model with new water use data, updated metering data will allow us to determine if baseline flows have changed since the model was created. If baseline flows are shown to have decreased, there may be additional capacity in the pipes not accounted for in this analysis. If flows have remained the same or increased, there may be even less capacity in the trunk lines than this analysis shows. If updated metering efforts are to be conducted, it is additionally recommended that extra metering efforts be taken along the trunk line spanning from 72 °d St. W. to the terminal MCES -129 interceptor, where pipe capacity is the most limited. Attachments Addendum \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx N o o o r m .- 62 �I"64tITSt Rosland Rmland Park Fred Richards Golf Course T I -- w 64th S tD c . ull•I I a rh St y MCES -128 Sheridan Park W 66th.St h L v W 67th St m W 68 h S tin SIi.L,E in.t n rn rn O n t , i . a > v a u a 0 in u u d 3 C > m N 4 d a .1 a a' 117 Meter 1 x O p X P r W 70th St Meter 21 I_ W70V2St United Minneapolis Cornelia Jewish Park J emetel Cemetery - d Cemetery W 71 112 St S'nai Emet ' Cemetery + > Meter w72ndSt rn m Lake Edina Park Fred Richard, olf Courr.e 771h.s l a i c allagher Dr Yraklown Adams ty J Park Hdl F.Irk 73rd St i j a Y V) Centennial > a W 74W St akes Park a y n -Y p' y > �0 MCES -129 a 4 e W 75th S 1 E m o h -- W- 76th-St--- -. --- -= - y m t Cir a m _ o' a � o r u W 77th 5t a 4 W W 7, 1111 o ! " 5 Ithtown 11)1 Sources: Essr�t]-Dye&rrfd NAVTEQ, MGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri v Japan ^M€TI; Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), Tom om, 2013 Pipe Capacity Filled ( %) - 0 -60 - 90 -95 O BARR 60 -80 95 -100 Feet Figure 1 0 600 1,200 1,800 80 -90 >100 SOUTH EAST EDINA Sanitary Sewer Not Meters SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY Included in Analysis 0 250 500 750 SE Edina SAC Availability Study Meter Location City of Edina, MN 1 inch = 1,200 feet A32 =,—: krcGIS 10.1, 201}07.2514:72 nk: 1:0Ijf b12 nG130,p.15ACAV ftM SE BU ,Wburas*Ig,r _11.17..4 U— ft, 04629 G-48334) .. 1 - - - IG304 31271 1,286 4,770 4,730 GUi1 45180 atti 1.127 ,167 7,3e5 m G5190 ar2 Nry 0 '� �G g441'.1'114 s 049I6 NIA G-5117 6�I 5C -5777 0.5146 II 13,702 wH 1,1,970 H C y 65727 ; NIA _ ''L WA 7,718 n m.� m NIA �p'AJA G G v 0 .5193 04205 G -6207 P -" ..... 1.875.-.. I.. 2.002 2.022 _ 45115 .-m NIA 1 C4147 NIA_.I .•', �BJ] G �n V m MCES429 R C- 8181., N 63777 04629 G-48334) .. C 31271 ' G-5202 997 GUi1 45180 1.127 G -5119 7,3e5 m G5190 '� �G y'y. s 049I6 NIA G-5117 6�I 0.5145 0.5146 II 13,702 r ; NIA _ ''L WA N!A'> NIA �p'AJA G .•� n .v-ml 45115 .-m NIA 1 C4147 NIA_.I .•', �BJ] G �n V m MCES429 •J°j7� el 71 J J i Meter 7 J,g2� c.3jJJ ct ,q m�r5 13 NAVTED, PC. NRCAN,� A ] 7 001 la1 y � \� �)JP 1.111 •. 7.999 64176' 6187, ! %: ^ �' tf �� 16• G- 1929 - TomTom, CLS 1,556 e) G -0189 45159 G -5161 68167 04629 G-48334) .. 7,618 7,690 7,212 v 1,558 24.379 °•r V ,y 45780 � GUi1 45180 7,zs. 7,3e5 m '� �G 5 r G-5249 x '. ,:• •i•,, uGate? �n 2,750 pob� MCES429 92 ct r • r t� . m Sourc . sd, Imnne, USGS, Imennap, NAVTED, PC. NRCAN,� . ?62 H 1 i a• ^ Esd Japan, METI, q (Hong Kong). Estl O Esd Chine (rhagan�,� ^ �' tf �� csts/ 7,371 - TomTom, iP.. G44 888 - �xa G-5239 G -8210 ' e - ,eox .eel � n n El rg m • G 3217 I ` 6-62; MCES 29 O 2,931 2,759 4545 4641 4524 .. 925 1 111 0449 .°� w 3,201 n i : j •, 64/7- 1.009 'Pry i 6.5250 1,168' 1 3,756 V' o G-860 I m'a G 4.066 i 237 M237 6.274 ; Rm T 0 � G-5234 ... 4y Te1h S1 6859 - IT. 4857 SS'S �4Se G-5233 :. •. 2.08 3 .7,270 I 1 ._w iiA 3' -' e 1.506 01178. ' G•e53 __.___ _� 1.620 1 - t `• n ,63320 _- 0 h 1.500 :: 8 11 rjI I. n _ 7 0y^•' G-522B I i i 1 6,26 I 66661111 63327 w� 1,876 6-5226 umni y�1sr O w� 948 - 45222 7't X 52111 7,062 G °fi5� 2.117 G3214 I G -887 898 1 1 j Pte) ie 1,679 °1 7 o �9 9,4 G- 88B��. 6,028 G466 ��n 710 G':n .. .... 0364 BOB i G-6212 65211 G5210 2,754 2,334 5.536 .o� '_•. -- ' - 411nnei,u.Dr G -5214 .......... .__ 1,639 Sources: Esd, DeLorme, NAVTED, USGS, Intennap, IPC, N .RGAN, Esd Japan, METI, Esd China (Hong Kong), Esd (rhaland), TomTom, 2013 Ear ° i Pipe capacity Filled ( %) —0-60 <_ - -90-95 — 60 -80 95 -100 80-90 -.- >100 Sanitary Sewer Not Included in Analysis ■ Meter Location OLabel Le end: Feet Pipe ID 0 200 400 600 64249 �_ Available SAC 9 2,75—Un1t9 Meters 0 50 100 150 1 inch = 400 feet A33 BARR Figure 2 SOUTH EAST EDINA SANITARY SEWER SAC CAPACITY (SOUTH) SE Edina SAC Availability Study City of Edina, MN 4 ecan F.,W,.v 1310.1. 201397. 2514:32FIb:1:lRefecb12MnG1]N,, pall ACAmbbnlyZEEdl ,Tlg,nWiquM_11a17— dUeer:mbm Pipe capacity Filled ( %6) 1 , I: 0-60 � -� 90-96 v -_ Or I 7.718 BARR � 60. 80 � 95-100 Feet 0 200 400 600 G -6008 ( 1 is Figure 3 - -- 80-90 = >100 1,700 6.6008 I r G,7�5 Sanitary Sewer Not Meters /,281 : SOUTH EAST EDINA SANITARY ' �t G4008 Ul b 63003 S,IOB _P ]9,443 11,053 !"11,13112 0 G -0011 I •,!� /p $,+ J; 1,892 �•'• 2,623 G3018 SEWER SAC CAPACITY (NORTH) Meter Location G399e 6399 ° m V + O 5077 : 1 a w ^ 7.821 ' SE Edina SAC Availability Study 2i 2,775 o 27T� i City of Edina, MN \ rj - 6-6007 GW9931 03023 65022 ]7,7]7, 5.63i',- d S U68 :602i 7 6'3012 �3 ` C-5021 : I �3� RX 2,278 m 6-19 2J, 0.4978 61977 / 11 e]oe 7792 7�0l6 I � It , 3.914 1-- .. 1 674835 y 1�a J 139! I l vmuan G-483! - v.craal 't. i�.� rvA ry7 � � i II.. b dJa •��' f 1,308 ( �Im 4 � CN., 9 n° ij ca ,ml (p b l I Ila:y,- wlhJ�le � I 0 . 1 ♦ cu G4a171 '1,5211 If I .. .WW: 51 wb :• i .. 834'1 �:: ,1 i I •.I��' lm e �59 sa ;a i eA pp 95� 61 y b 6-0983 11 _ G-4350 __ .G-4849 G -04114a GdB /7 ._.... G-4846 .G48 44 �o 9 654 3,213 _ .889 883 893 898 1.059 1.063 ^ U' 7 � Meter 1 j GJMe •p)p yn� , I 471 (fry I I t b I.II I '.i •/ .. ... - .. • "c "i 63,12;.- __ f,5140'- _C -0176, ... _ 2,447' 1.281 1,730. I q G-5141 g 6,197 u IN !i 'm .m ter 2 GJ921 V IN 1,444 w m e m V 0 121 63 /25 y y I ;7 U' •! "r 61177 j mm - e7� 1,224 1,987 ^ ..1.970.. lib I II �hF 3 „ �a 0412: 7,716 c -0nx oI 67,97 j"I4 G -0204 65207 �m V 1,833, y_ - 2,002 2.022 j aa I'.� G518i 7,771 j 69872 n 7 C 63179 G-5130 ,7 G-4923' GJ926 NIA 65117 17 G -0145 G5141 17,702 \ 'NIA NIA`? NIA jEsd 49 G -0918 WA WA' -... _ 64911 W920 •' N/A I 4.851 NIA NI�J51 Sourddsffia, Lorulg2P1A1/GF�G, USGS, Intennap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, n (Hong r _, M3 :., Kong), Esri (Thailand). Torn - Pipe capacity Filled ( %6) O Label Le end: 0-60 � -� 90-96 BARR � 60. 80 � 95-100 Feet 0 200 400 600 Pipe ID G -5249 ---- Available SAC Figure 3 - -- 80-90 = >100 2,769f —Unn3 Sanitary Sewer Not Meters SOUTH EAST EDINA SANITARY — Included in Analysis 0 50 100 150 SEWER SAC CAPACITY (NORTH) Meter Location ® SE Edina SAC Availability Study City of Edina, MN 1 inch = 400 feet �3� To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 9 c: Ross Bintner Table 1. Sanitary flows from post-20 05 major develo ments Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Metered or Flow SAC Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Development Address Projected Units Location flow added 4.0 30.0 Flow? 8.4 G -840 Byedy's 7171 France Ave. Projected 210.8 Hazelton & France Southdale Apartments W 69th & York Ave S Projected 190.5 69th & York Westin 3201 Galieria Metered 10,9 (2/3) 69th & York, (1/3) 69th and 7.4 4.0 34.5 1,384.8 York Edina Medical Plaza 6500 France Ave Assumed 109.5 1 W 65th &France Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Cagpanity Pipe Capacity (% Full) G-839 0.6 7.4 4.0 30.0 356.1 8.4 G -840 1.2 7.4 4.0 30.7 368.3 8.3 G-841 2.0 7.4 4.0 31.4 391.6 8.0 G -842 5.1 7.4 4.0 34.5 1,384.8 2.5 G-843 0.2 0.0 4.0 0.2 427.6 0.0 G -844 1.2 0.1 4.0 1.7 368.3 0.5 G-845 2.6 11.0 4.0 46.6 380.1 12.3 G -846 10.8 18.4 4.0 84.3 1,692.2 5.0 G -848 1.4 0.0 4.0 1.4 722.5 0.2 G -849 0.8 0.0 4.0 0.8 364.3 0.2 G -850 3.2 0.2 4.0 3.9 376.2 10 G -851 4.3 0.2 4.0 5.0 413.6 12 G -852 4.9 0.2 4.0 5.6 589.4 1.0 G -853 6.9 0.2 4.0 7.7 629.0 12 G-854 9.8 4.7 4.0 28.5 1,242.5 2.3 G -856 10.3 4.7 4.0 29.0 572,.8 51 G-857 11.3 4.7 4.0 30.0 572.8 5.2 G -858 12.3 4.7 4.0 30.9 572.8 5.4 G -859 13.2 4.7 4.0 31.9 2,978.6 11 G -860 0.2 0.0 4.0 0.2 1,753.8 0.0 G-861 2.4 0.0 4.0 2.4 1,011.3 0.2 G -862 0.7 0.0 4.0 0.7 339.1 0.2 G -863 1.1 3.6 4.0 15.6 339.1 4.6 G -864 1.6 3.6 4.0 16.1 343.5 4.7 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx A3A�' To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 10 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Pipe Capacity (% Full) G -865 0.8 0.0 4.0 0.8 343.5 0.2 G -866 2.6 21.3 4.0 87.7 343.5 25.5 G-867 3.4 21.3 4.0 88.5 343.5 25.8 G -868 3.8 21.3 4.0 88.9 2,261.3 3.9 G-869 7.8 21.3 4.0 92.9 1,011.3 9.2 G -4827 1,042.6 1,987.4 2.7 6,408.7 7,505.8 85.4 G-4828 3.2 1.3 4.0 8.2 469.6 18 G-4829 3.4 1.3 4.0 8.4 570.3 15 G -4830 3.4 1.3 4.0 8.4 3,931.6 0.2 G-4831 74.6 57.1 4.0 302.9 1,420.3 21.3 G-4832 74.7 57.4 4.0 304.1 9,848.6 3.1 G-4833 1,117.8 2,044.9 2.6 6,434.4 15,198.2 42.3 G-4834 1,122.0 2,046.1 2.6 6,441.8 35,682.4 181 G -4835 0.6 0.0 4.0 0.7 503.6 0.1 G-4836 1.2 2.1 4.0 9.6 481.2 2.0 G -4837 0.4 0.0 4.0 0.6 519.8 0.1 G -4838 2.0 2.2 4.0 10.6 519.8 2.0 G -4839 3.0 2.3 4.0 12.1 519.8 2.3 G-4840 5.4 23.6 4.0 99.9 519.8 19.2 G-4841 6.8 26.0 4.0 110.8 519.8 21.3 G-4842 7.8 29.7 4.0 126.4 519.8 24.3 G -4843 8.2 30.3 4.0 129.4 519.8 24.9 G-4844 9.5 31.8 4.0 136.8 519.8 26.3 G-4845 10.7 31.8 4.0 138.0 519.8 26.5 G-4846 10.8 77.3 4.0 320.0 519.8 61.6 G-4847 11.7 77.3 4.0 320.9 680.5 471 G-4848 12.6 88.6 3.9 358.1 680.5 52.6 G -4849 13.5 89.0 3.9 360.4 680.5 53.0 G -4850 13.6 89.0 3.9 360.5 680.4 53.0 G-4851 13.8 105.9 3.9 426.7 1,592.9 1 26.8 G-4857 1.1 0.4 4.0 2.5 550.6 0.5 G -4858 0.2 69.4 4.0 277.9 1,023.8 271 G -4914 676.3 1,043.6 2.9 3,702.7 3,517.1 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx 436 To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 11 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity Pipe Capacity (% Full) G-4916 0.9 0.0 4.0 0.9 575.1 0.2 G-4917 2.3 0.1 4.0 2.8 575.1 1i G-4918 3.6 0.4 4.0 5.4 719.8 G -4919 682.9 1,044.4 2.9 3,711.6 3,517.1 j05 G-4920 683.8 1,044.3 2.9 3,712.4 3,517.1 G-4921 0.9 0.0 4.0 0.9 680.5 01 G-4922 2.3 0.7 4.0 5.0 643.0 0.8 G -4923 3.6 2.0 4.0 11.5 643.0 18 G-4924 4.9 3.0 4.0 17.0 749.9 2.3 G-4925 691.3 1,048.1 2.9 3,730.9 3,798.9 G-4926 692.4 1,048.4 2.9 3,732.8 3,660.7 G-4959 0.4 152.9 3.8 581.5 1,023.8 56.8 G4960 0.5 152.9 3.8 581.6 1,023.8 56.8 G4961 14.5 258.9 3.6 946.5 1,289.0 73.4 G-4962 14.7 258.8 3.6 946.5 2,108.2 44.9 G4963 15.0 258.9 3.6 947.2 1,943.9 48.7 G -4964 177.7 683.3 3.2 2,364.4 3,660.7 64.6 G-4965 162.1 424.3 3.4 1,604.8 3,798.9 42.2 G4966 162.4 424.2 3.4 1,604.8 3,517.0 45.6 G4967 18.4 101.4 3.9 413.8 799.4 51.8 G -4968 160.4 425.0 3.4 1,605.3 3,517.0 45.6 G4969 160.7 424.9 3.4 1,605.3 3,517.0 45.6 G4970 161.2 424.7 3.4 1,605.2 3,517.0 45.6 G-4971 161.4 424.6 3.4 1,605.1 3,517.0 45.6 G -4972 161.8 424.5 3.4 1,605.1 3,517.0 45.6 G4973 162.1 424.4 3.4 1,605.1 3,517.0 45.6 G4974 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.1 1,623.0 0.0 G -4976 0.4 0.0 4.0 0.4 4,368.0 0.0 G4977 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 380.2 0.0 G -4978 0.2 0.0 4.0 0.2 1,222.6 0.0 G�979 159.1 425.3 3.4 1,605.0 3,045.8 52.7 G -4980 159.3 425.2 3.4 1,605.1 3,517.0 45.6 G4981 159.6 425.1 3.4 1,605.0 3,517.0 45.6 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo- 072313 - 2.docx A37 To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 12 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration nfi (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity Pipe Capacity (% Full) G-4982 158.8 425.3 3.4 1,604.8 3,517.0 45.6 G -4994 155.3 391.7 3.4 1,487.2 2,487.0 59.8 G-4995 155.6 391.6 3.4 1,487.0 3,517.0 42.3 G-4996 156.0 391.5 3.4 1,487.0 2,487.0 59.8 G-4997 156.3 391.4 3.4 1,487.0 3,367.1 44.2 G -4998 156.6 391.3 3.4 1,486.9 3,517.0 42.3 G -4999 156.6 391.2 3.4 1,486.9 4,973.9 29.9 G -5002 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 14,358.6 0.0 G -5003 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.1 12,013.0 0.0 G -5005 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.1 469.5 0.0 G -5006 0.2 0.2 4.0 1.1 469.5 0.2 G -5007 0.2 0.2 4.0 1.1 475.3 0.2 G -5008 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1,841.1 0.0 G -5009 0.3 0.4 4.0 1.7 1,548.0 0.1 G -5010 0.3 0.4 4.0 1.8 1,750.9 0.1 G -5011 0.4 0.4 4.0 2.0 1,610.0 0.1 G -5012 0.7 0.7 4.0 3.5 3,286.8 01 G -5013 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.1 815.5 0.0 G -5014 0.2 0.3 4.0 1.5 3,984.7 0.0 G -5015 157.7 391.8 3.4 1,489.9 3,367.1 44.2 G -5017 0.0 5.9 4.0 23.7 2,348.7 10 G -5018 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2,675.5 0.0 G -5019 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.1 946.1 0.0 G -5020 0.4 7.3 4.0 29.7 639.6 4.6 G -5021 0.4 7.5 4.0 30.3 750.0 4.0 G -5022 0.5 7.6 4.0 30.9 320.0 9.7 G -5023 0.7 33.7 4.0 135.5 1,169.2 11.6 G -5024 0.8 33.7 4.0 135.6 956.5 14.2 G -5025 158.7 425.4 3.4 1,604.9 2,270.2 70Y G -5112 0.8 0.0 4.0 0.8 469.6 0.2 G -5113 1.3 1.0 4.0 5.4 894.0 0.6 G -5114 0.9 0.0 4.0 0.9 680.5 01 G -5115 695.8 1,049.3 2.9 3,738.7 3,517.1 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327GI3 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx 43� To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 13 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity Pipe Capacity (off, Full) G -5116 696.8 1,049.5 2.9 3,740.2 3,660.7 102.2 G -5117 700.6 1,050.5 2.9 3,747.2 3,517.1 106.5 G -5118 701.9 1,050.7 2.9 3,748.9 3,517.1 106.6 G -5119 1.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 486.9 0.2 G -5120 1.4 0.0 4.0 1.4 1,286.0 01 G -5121 2.1 0.4 4.0 3.9 1.288.1 0.3 G -5122 2.3 0.8 4.0 5.5 1,344.7 0.4 G -5123 6.0 3.2 4.0 18.8 469.6 4.0 G -5124 8.5 5.0 4.0 28.5 469.6 6.1 G -5125 12.3 6.3 4.0 37.7 757.2 5.0 G -5126 1.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 1,328.2 0.1 G -5127 2.0 1.2 4.0 6.8 1,328.2 0.5 G -5128 1.5 0.0 4.0 1.5 514.4 0.3 G -5129 2.9 1.3 4.0 8.1 420.0 19 G -5130 1.5 0.0 4.0 1.5 514.4 0.3 G -5131 2.9 0.8 4.0 6.2 420.0 1.5 G -5132 212.8 794.4 3.1 2,675.4 3,798.9 70.4 G -5133 216.7 794.3 3.1 2,679.0 3,367.4 79.6 G -5134 1.4 0.0 4.0 1.4 1,050.0 01 G -5135 2.1 4.5 4.0 20.3 469.6. 4.3 G -5136 196.4 784.9 3.1 2,629.5 3,517.0 74.8 G -5137 196.6 785.0 3.1 2,630.2 3,517.0 74.8 G -5138 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1,704.7 0.0 G -5139 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.1 469.5 0.0 G -5140 0.2 1.6 4.0 6.7 469.5 1.4 G -5141 0.3 1.6 4.0 6.7 2,337.5 0.3 G -5142 197.0 786.5 3.1 2,635.2 3,517.0 74.9 G -5143 197.4 786.4 3.1 2,635.2 3,517.0 74.9 G -5144 200.1 787.3 3.1 2,640.9 3,367.4 78.4 G -5145 705.4 1,051.2 2.9 3,753.8 3,517.1 106.7 G -5146 709.4 1,051.4 2.9 3,758.4 3,517.1 106.9 G -5147 710.1 1,051.2 2.9 3,758.6 3,367.4 1116 G -5148 229.2 800.1 3.1 2,709.5 6,421.3 42.2 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx X31 To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 14 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gp-) Pipe Capacity (% Full) G -5149 230.7 799.8 3.1 2,710.1 6,279.8 43.2 G -5150 233.2 799.6 3.1 2,712.1 7,505.8 36.1 G -5151 956.3 1,912.1 2.7 6,118.8 9,786.4 615 G -5152 960.9 1,911.9 2.7 6,123.1 7,872.2 778 G -5153 963.3 1,911.6 2.7 6,124.6 8,558.0 71.6 G -5154 966.7 1,911.3 2.7 6,127.3 7,505.8 81.6 G -5155 971.4 1,912.4 2.7 6,135.0 7,505.8 817 G -5156 977.5 1,912.1 2.7 6,140.1 7,120.7 862 G -5157 984.6 1,927.2 2.7 6,188.2 7,505.8 824 G -5158 988.3 1,927.0 2.7 6,191.1 7,505.8 82.5 G -5159 994.2 1,932.6 2.7 6,212.1 7,505.8 82.8 G -5160 996.5 1,932.3 2.7 6,213.7 7,505.8 82.8 G -5161 1,014.9 1,975.3 2.7 6,348.2 7,505.8 84.6 G -5162 1,021.0 1,974.9 2.7 6,353.3 7,505.8 84.6 G -5163 1,026.4 1,974.4 2.7 6,357.3 7,505.8 84.7 G -5164 1,032.2 1,988.0 2.7 6,399.9 7,505.8 85.3 G -5165 1,037.4 1,987.5 2.7 6,403.6 7,120.7 89.9 6-5166 0.4 0.0 4.0 0.4 251.8 01 G -5167 0.2 0.9 4.0 3.6 159.3 2.3 G -5168 2.4 1.3 4.0 7.6 469.6 16 G -5169 3.8 1.3 4.0 9.0 771.6 12 G -5170 5.8 1.3 4.0 11.0 846.5 1.3 G -5171 7.2 1.5 4.0 13.1 1,938.7 0.7 G -5172 8.3 1.6 4.0 14.8 159.9 9.2 G -5173 10.1 14.3 4.0 67.2 750.0 9.0 G -5174 10.6 14.3 4.0 67.7 783.3 8.6 G -5175 12.7 43.4 4.0 186.3 2,974.3 6.3 G -5176 0.9 0.0 4.0 0.9 1,607.0 01 G -5177 0.6 0.0 4.0 0.6 1,558.5 0.0 G -5181 1.4 6.0 4.0 25.5 753.5 3.4 G -5182 0.2 0.0 4.0 0.2 274.7 0.1 G -5183 1.0 2.5 4.0 10.9 343.5 3.2 G -5184 1.1 4.4 4.0 18.7 1,233.6 15 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx ( 0,: r, To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 15 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity Pipe Capacity (% Full) G -5185 0.8 0.0 4.0 0.8 473.6 0.2 G -5186 2.7 8.1 4.0 35.0 473.6 7.4 G -5187 3.3 10.6 4.0 45.8 468.3 9.8 G -5188 3.9 12.0 4.0 51.8 462.9 112 G -5189 4.5 15.1 4.0 65.0 1,044.8 6.2 G -5190 0.7 0.0 4.0 0.7 467.2 01 G -5191 2.2 0.3 4.0 3.2 485.7 0.7 G -5192 222.2 800.4 3.1 2,703.3 4,307.5 62.8 G -5193 225.4 800.2 3.1 2,705.9 3,367.4 80.4 G -5199 1.4 0.0 4.0 1.4 664.1 0.2 G -5200 2.8 0.1 4.0 3.3 664.1 0.5 G -5201 9.4 54.0 4.0 225.6 565.4 39.9 G -5202 10.5 54.0 4.0 226.6 584.6 38.8 G -5203 10.5 61.5 4.0 256.5 4,163.1 6.2 G -5206 1.6 0.0 4.0 1.6 469.6 0.3 G -5207 3.1 2.6 4.0 13.7 742.5 18 G -5208 4.3 4.1 4.0 20.8 742.5 2.8 G -5210 1.5 6.6 4.0 28.1 942.2 3.0 G -5211 2.8 6.6 4.0 29.3 870.6 3.4 G -5212 3.5 6.6 4.0 30.1 878.6 3.4 G -5213 6.8 6.6 4.0 33.4 1,328.2 2.5 G -5214 4.0 6.6 4.0 30.6 621.2 4.9 G -5216 0.9 0.0 4.0 0.9 697.6 01 G -5218 0.8 0.0 4.0 0.8 708.1 01 G -5219 2.3 0.2 4.0 3.0 766.1 0.4 G -5220 7.1 6.6 4.0 33.6 2,398.5 14 G -5221 29.1 23.0 4.0 121.2 2,041.5 5.9 G -5222 38.5 34.3 4.0 175.8 1,279.2 13.7 G -5223 26.6 23.0 4.0 118.7 932.4 12.7 G -5224 0.7 0.0 4.0 0.7 410.0 0.2 G -5225 0.9 0.0 4.0 0.9 343.5 0.3 G -5226 1.7 0.0 4.0 1.7 343.5 0.5 G -5227 2.1 0.0 4.0 2.3 678.3 0.3 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx 44( To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nester, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 16 c: Ross Bintner Table 2. Pipe capacity Pipe Segment Estimated Infiltration (gpm) Mean Flow (gpm) Peaking Factor Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity Pipe Capacity (% Full) G -5228 2.5 0.0 4.0 2.7 2,261.3 0.1 G -5229 11.7 21.3 4.0 97.0 1,011.3 9.6 G -5230 13.8 21.3 4.0 98.9 1,011.3 98 G -5231 0.2 0.0 4.0 0.2 1,311.2 0.0 G -5233 1.2 0.0 4.0 1.2 447.8 0.3 G -5234 42.8 34.6 4.0 181.4 1,359.8 13.3 G -5235 38.9 33.4 4.0 172.6 916.8 18.8 G -5236 59.2 56.4 4.0 284.7 1,359.8 20.9 G -5237 0.4 0.0 4.0 0.4 2,261.3 0.0 G -5238 62.2 56.3 4.0 287.5 1,359.8 211 G -5239 1.7 0.0 4.0 1.7 1,011.3 0.2 G -5240 2.6 0.1 4.0 3.2 1,036.3 0.3 G -5241 4.7 0.2 4.0 5.4 972.6 0.6 G -5243 69.4 56.5 4.0 295.2 1,359.8 217 G -5244 70.2 56.5 4.0 296.1 1,449.6 20.4 G -5246 0.4 0.0 4.0 0.4 446.5 01 G -5247 1.7 0.2 4.0 2.6 1,102.8 0.2 G -5248 2.3 0.6 4.0 4.9 1,655.7 0.3 G -5249 74.0 57.1 4.0 302.3 1,296.5 23.3 G -5250 2.4 0.6 4.0 4.9 1,214.3 0.4 G -5251 1.5 0.0 4.0 1.5 486.9 0.3 G -5252 3.1 0.9 4.0 6.8 486.9 14 G -5277 1.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 446.5 0.2 G -5278 1.6 0.1 4.0 2.1 446.5 0.5 G -5320 1.9 0.1 4.0 2.4 543.1 0.4 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MM27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx hia To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 17 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC availabilit Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G -839 30.0 356.1 326.1 904.9 G -840 30.7 368.3 337.6 936.8 G -841 31.4 391.6 360.2 999.5 G -842 34.5 1384.8 1350.3 3746.8 G-843 0.2 427.6 427.4 1186.0 G -844 1.7 368.3 366.6 1017.2 G -845 46.6 380.1 333.5 925.4 G -846 84.3 1692.2 1607.9 4461.6 G -848 1.4 722.5 721.1 2000.9 G -849 0.8 364.3 363.5 1008.6 G-850 3.9 376.2 372.3 1033.1 G -851 5.0 413.6 408.6 1133.8 G-852 5.6 589.4 583.8 1619.9 G -853 7.7 629.0 621.3 1724.0 G-854 28.5 1242.5 1214.0 3368.6 G -856 29.0 572.8 543.8 1508.9 G-857 30.0 572.8 542.8 1506.2 G -858 30.9 572.8 541.9 1503.7 G -859 31.9 2978.6 2946.7 8176.5 G -860 0.2 1753.8 1753.6 4865.9 G-861 2.4 1011.3 1008.9 2799.5 G -862 0.7 339.1 338.4 939.0 G -863 15.6 339.1 323.5 897.6 G -864 16.1 343.5 327.4 908.5 G-865 0.8 343.5 342.7 950.9 G -866 87.7 343.5 255.8 709.8 G -867 88.5 343.5 255.0 707.6 G-868 88.9 2261.3 2172.4 6028.0 G-869 92.9 1011.3 918.4 2548.4 G-4827 6408.7 7505.8 1097.1 3044.2 G -4828 8.2 469.6 461.4 1280.3 G-4829 8.4 570.3 561.9 1559.2 G-4830 8.4 3931.6 3923.2 10886.1 \ \barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327GI3 \WorkFiles\SAC Availabiliry\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx /V0 To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 18 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC availabilit Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G-4831 302.9 1420.3 1117.4 3100.6 G-4832 304.1 9848.6 9544.5 26484.1 G -4833 6434.4 15198.2 8763.8 24317.8 G-4834 6441.8 35682.4 29240.6 81136.9 G-4835 0.7 503.6 502.9 1395.4 G -4836 9.6 481.2 471.6 1308.6 G-4837 0.6 519.8 519.2 1440.7 G-4838 10.6 519.8 509.2 1412.9 G -4839 12.1 519.8 507.7 1408.8 G-4840 99.9 519.8 419.9 1165.1 G-4841 110.8 519.8 409.0 1134.9 G-4842 126.4 519.8 393.4 1091.6 G-4843 129.4 519.8 390.4 1083.3 G -4844 136.8 519.8 383.0 1062.7 G -4845 138.0 519.8 381.8 1059.4 G -4846 320.0 519.8 199.8 554.4 G -4847 320.9 680.5 359.6 997.8 G-4848 358.1 680.5 322.4 894.6 G-4849 360.4 680.5 320.1 888.2 G-4850 360.5 680.4 319.9 887.7 G-4851 426.7 1592.9 1166.2 3236.0 G-4857 2.5 550.6 548.1 1520.9 G -4858 277.9 1023.8 745.9 2069.7 G -4914 3702.7 3511 G -4916 0.9 575.1 574.2 1593.3 G-4917 2.8 575.1 572.3 1588.0 G-4918 5.4 719.8 714.4 1982.3 G-4919 3711.6 3517.1 G-4920 3712.4 3517.1 G-4921 0.9 680.5 679.6 1885.8 G-4922 5.0 643.0 638.0 1770.3 G-4923 11.5 643.0 631.5 1752.3 G -4924 17.0 749.9 732.9 2033.7 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MM27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability \Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx Wk To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 19 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC availabilit Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G-4925 3730.9 3798.9 68.0 188.7 G-4926 3732.8 3660.7 G-4959 581.5 1023.8 442.3 1227.3 G -4960 581.6 1023.8 442.2 1227.0 G -4961 946.5 1289.0 342.5 950.4 G-4962 946.5 2108.2 1161.7 3223.5 G-4963 947.2 1943.9 996.7 2765.6 G -4964 2364.4 3660.7 1296.3 3597.0 G-4965 1604.8 3798.9 2194.1 6088.2 G-4966 1604.8 3517.0 1912.2 5306.0 G -4967 413.8 799.4 385.6 1070.0 G-4968 1605.3 3517.0 1911.7 5304.6 G-4969 1605.3 3517.0 1911.7 5304.6 G -4970 1605.2 3517.0 1911.8 5304.9 G-4971 1605.1 .3517.0 1911.9 5305.1 G-4972 1605.1 3517.0 1911.9 5305.1 G -4973 1605.1 3517.0 1911.9 5305.1 G-4974 0.1 1623.0 1622.9 4503.2 G-4976 0.4 4368.0 4367.6 12119.2 G-4977 0.0 380.2 380.2 1055.0 G-4978 0.2 1222.6 1222.4 3391.9 G-4979 1605.0 3045.8 1440.8 3997.9 G -4980 1605.1 3517.0 1911.9 5305.1 G-4981 1605.0 3517.0 1912.0 5305.4 G-4982 1604.8 3517.0 1912.2 5306.0 G-4994 1487.2 2487.0 999.8 2774.2 G -4995 1487.0 3517.0 2030.0 5632.8 G-4996 1487.0 2487.0 1000.0 2774.8 G-4997 1487.0 3367.1 1880.1 5216.9 G-4998 1486.9 3517.0 2030.1 5633.1 G-4999 1486.9 4973.9 3487.0 9675.7 G -5002 0.0 14358.6 14358.6 39842.3 G -5003 0.1 12013.0 12012.9 33333.4 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx W_ To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 20 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC bility Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G -5005 0.1 469.5 469.4 1302.5 G -5006 1.1 469.5 468.4 1299.7 G -5007 1.1 475.3 474.2 1315.8 G -5008 0.0 1841.1 1841.1 5108.7 G -5009 1.7 1548.0 1546.3 4290.7 G -5010 1.8 1750.9 1749.1 4853.4 G -5011 2.0 1610.0 1608.0 4461.9 G -5012 3.5 3286.8 3283.3 9110.5 G -5013 0.1 815.5 815.4 2262.6 G -5014 1.5 3984.7 3983.2 11052.6 G -5015 1489.9 3367.1 1877.2 5208.9 G -5017 23.7 2348.7 2325.0 6451.4 G -5018 0.0 2675.5 2675.5 7424.0 G -5019 0.1 946.1 946.0 2625.0 G -5020 29.7 639.6 609.9 1692.4 G -5021 30.3 750.0 719.7 1997.0 G -5022 30.9 320.0 289.1 802.2 G -5023 135.5 1169.2 1033.7 2868.3 G -5024 135.6 956.5 820.9 2277.8 G -5025 1604.9 2270.2 665.3 1846.1 G -5112 0.8 469.6 468.8 1300.8 G -5113 5.4 894.0 888.6 2465.7 G -5114 0.9 680.5 679.6 1885.8 G -5115 3738.7 3517.1 G -5116 3740.2 3660.7 G -5117 3747.2 3517.1 G -5118 3748.9 3517.1 G -5119 1.0 486.9 485.9 1348.3 G -5120 1.4 1286.0 1284.6 3564.5 G -5121 3.9 1288.1 1284.2 3563.4 G -5122 5.5 1344.7 1339.2 3716.0 G -5123 18.8 469.6 450.8 1250.9 G -5124 28.5 469.6 441.1 1224.0 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327GI3 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx Any To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 21 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC billity Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G -5125 37.7 757.2 719.5 1996.5 G -5126 1.0 1328.2 1327.2 3682.7 G -5127 6.8 1328.2 1321.4 3666.6 G -5128 1.5 514.4 512.9 1423.2 G -5129 8.1 420.0 411.9 1142.9 G -5130 1.5 514.4 512.9 1423.2 G -5131 6.2 420.0 413.8 1148.2 G -5132 2675.4 3798.9 1123.5 3117.5 G -5133 2679.0 3367.4 688.4 1910.2 G -5134 1.4 1050.0 1048.6 2909.7 G -5135 20.3 469.6 449.3 1246.7 G -5136 2629.5 3517.0 887.5 2462.6 G -5137 2630.2 3517.0 886.8 2460.7 G -5138 0.0 1704.7 1704.7 4730.2 G -5139 0.1 469.5 469.4 1302.5 G -5140 6.7 469.5 462.8 1284.2 G -5141 6.7 2337.5 2330.8 6467.5 G -5142 2635.2 3517.0 881.8 2446.8 G-5143 2635.2 3517.0 881.8 2446.8 G -5144 2640.9 3367.4 726.5 2015.9 G -5145 3753.8 3517.1 G -5146 3758.4 3517.1 G -5147 3758.6 3367.4 G -5148 2709.5 6421.3 3711.8 10299.5 G -5149 2710.1 6279.8 3569.7 9905.2 G -5150 2712.1 7505.8 4793.7 13301.6 G -5151 6118.8 9786.4 3667.6 10176.9 G -5152 6123.1 7872.2 1749.1 4853.4 G -5153 6124.6 8558.0 2433.4 6752.2 G -5154 6127.3 7505.8 1378.5 3825.1 G -5155 6135.0 7505.8 1370.8 3803.7 G -5156 6140.1 7120.7 980.6 2721.0 G -5157 6188.2 7505.8 1317.6 3656.1 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina\SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx W To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 22 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC bility Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G -5158 6191.1 7505.8 1314.7 3648.0 G -5159 6212.1 7505.8 1293.7 3589.8 G -5160 6213.7 7505.8 1292.1 3585.3 G -5161 6348.2 7505.8 1157.6 3212.1 G -5162 6353.3 7505.8 1152.5 3198.0 G -5163 6357.3 7505.8 1148.5 3186.9 G -5164 6399.9 7505.8 1105.9 3068.7 G -5165 6403.6 7120.7 717.1 1989.8 G -5166 0.4 251.8 251.4 697.6 G -5167 3.6 159.3 155.7 432.0 G -5168 7.6 469.6 462.0 1282.0 G -5169 9.0 771.6 762.6 2116.1 G -5170 11.0 846.5 835.5 2318.3 G -5171 13.1 1938.7 1925.6 5343.2 G -5172 14.8 159.9 145.1 402.6 G -5173 67.2 750.0 682.8 1894.6 G -5174 67.7 783.3 715.6 1985.6 G -5175 186.3 2974.3 2788.0 7736.1 G -5176 0.9 1607.0 1606.1 4456.6 G -5177 0.6 1558.5 1557.9 4322.9 G -5181 25.5 753.5 728.0 2020.1 G -5182 0.2 274.7 274.5 761.7 G -5183 10.9 343.5 332.6 922.9 G -5184 18.7 1233.6 1214.9 3371.1 G -5185 0.8 473.6 472.8 1311.9 G -5186 35.0 473.6 438.6 1217.0 G -5187 45.8 468.3 422.5 1172.4 G -5188 51.8 462.9 411.1 1140.7 G -5189 65.0 1044.8 979.8 2718.8 G -5190 0.7 467.2 466.5 1294.4 G -5191 3.2 485.7 482.5 1338.8 G -5192 2703.3 4307.5 1604.2 4451.3 G -5193 2705.9 3367.4 661.5 1835.5 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.doex A$g To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 23 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC availabilit Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G -5199 1.4 664.1 662.7 1838.9 G -5200 3.3 664.1 660.8 1833.6 G -5201 225.6 565.4 339.8 942.9 G -5202 226.6 584.6 358.0 993.4 G -5203 256.5 4163.1 3906.6 10840.0 G -5206 1.6 469.6 468.0 1298.6 G -5207 13.7 742.5 728.8 2022.3 G -5208 20.8 742.5 721.7 2002.6 G -5210 28.1 942.2 914.1 2536.4 G -5211 29.3 870.6 841.3 2334.4 G -5212 30.1 878.6 848.5 2354.4 G -5213 33.4 1328.2 1294.8 3592.8 G -5214 30.6 621.2 590.6 1638.8 G -5216 0.9 697.6 696.7 1933.2 G -5218 0.8 708.1 707.3 1962.6 G -5219 3.0 766.1 763.1 2117.5 G -5220 33.6 2398.5 2364.9 6562.1 G -5221 121.2 2041.5 1920.3 5328.5 G -5222 175.8 1279.2 1103.4 3061.7 G -5223 118.7 932.4 813.7 2257.9 G -5224 0.7 410.0 409.3 1135.7 G -5225 0.9 343.5 342.6 950.6 G -5226 1.7 343.5 341.8 948.4 G -5227 2.3 678.3 676.0 1875.8 G -5228 2.7 2261.3 2258.6 6267.2 G -5229 97.0 1011.3 914.3 2537.0 G -5230 98.9 1011.3 912.4 2531.7 G -5231 0.2 1311.2 1311.0 3637.8 G -5233 1.2 447.8 446.6 1239.2 G -5234 181.4 1359.8 1178.4 3269.8 G -5235 172.6 916.8 744.2 2065.0 G -5236 284.7 1359.8 1075.1 2983.2 G -5237 0.4 2261.3 2260.9 6273.5 \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx 01 To: Wayne Houle From: Brian LeMon, Dan Nesler, and Michael McKinney Subject: Southeast Edina SAC Availability Analysis Date: July 23, 2013 Page: 24 c: Ross Bintner Table 3: SAC availability Pipe Segment Estimated Peak Flow (gpm) Maximum Pipe Capacity (gpm) Available Pipe Capacity (gpm) SAC Units Available' G -5238 287.5 1359.8 1072.3 2975.4 G -5239 1.7 1011.3 1009.6 2801.4 G -5240 3.2 1036.3 1033.1 2866.6 G -5241 5.4 972.6 967.2 2683.8 G -5243 295.2 1359.8 1064.6 2954.1 G -5244 296.1 1449.6 1153.5 3200.7 G -5246 0.4 446.5 446.1 1237.8 G -5247 2.6 1102.8 1100.2 3052.8 G -5248 4.9 1655.7 1650.8 4580.6 G -5249 302.3 1296.5 994.2 2758.7 G -5250 4.9 1214.3 1209.4 3355.8 G -5251 1.5 486.9 485.4 1346.9 G -5252 6.8 486.9 480.1 1332.2 G -5277 1.0 446.5 445.5 1236.2 G -5278 2.1 446.5 444.4 1233.1 G -5320 2.4 543.1 540.7 1500.3 ' SAC units available adjusted to account for peak usage rate predicted by typical diurnal water usage curve. \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx Aso Addendum Infiltration and inflow (I &I) used in the City of Edina XP -SWMM sanitary sewer model (model) is based on metering efforts conducted in February and June of 2006. Base -line sewer flows used in the model are based on 2005 winter quarter water sales. Since 2006, redevelopment in the city of Edina, repairs to the sanitary sewer infrastructure, and improved water consumption efficiency have likely led to changes in expected base -line sewer flow and I &I flow. Figure 1 shows meter data collected for model development in 2006 compared to meter data collected as part of the FilmTec Flow Analysis Study, completed for the City of Edina in December of 2012. The meter data shown was collected at the MCES -129 interceptor. As can be seen, there is a large difference in flow observed between the two studies. Some of the factors which may explain difference in flow rate observed between the 2006 and 2012 studies are outlined below: a I &I reduction efforts conducted by the City of Edina since 2006, including replacing manhole covers and lining pipes. • Reduction in base -line sewer flow since 2006. • Differences in climatic conditions during the metering periods of the two studies; the fall of 2012 was exceptionally dry, potentially leading to lower than average pipe infiltration. Figure 3 shows a comparison of monthly precipitation totals in 2006 and 2012. Figure 2 shows the 2006 and 2012 observed flow at MCES -129 compared to the flow predicted by the model. As can be seen, the 2006 data matches closely to the flow predicted by the model plus expected infiltration, whereas the 2012 matches more closely to the flow predicted by the model without the addition of infiltration. This observation could be caused by one or any combination of the factors outlined above. To better understand which factors are contributing to the decrease in observed flow and to help evaluate if updated calibration of the model is required, it is recommended that updated metering efforts be carried out, especially in areas identified as at or near capacity by current model projections. In addition to this, once the City has completed its water meter replacement program, new water use data should be added to the model to ensure more accurate calculation of base sanitary flow. \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx k Figure 1. 2006 and 2012 MCES -129 metered flow data. 12.0 10.0 A, hA A 8.0 N W 6.0 3 0 U. d a \ 4.0 0 ' ns�\Vj q qq .2 1 2.0 K 4.0 MCES -129; 2012 meter data MCES -129; 2006 meter data ' •••••• XP -SWMM Flow + Infiltration 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (days) Figure 1. 2006 and 2012 MCES -129 metered flow data. Figure 2. 2006 and 2012 MCES -129 metered flow data with XP -SWMM modeled flow. \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327GI3 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability \Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx W 12.0 10.0 A, hA A 8.0 6.0 0 \ 0 ' ns�\Vj q qq .2 1 CL K 4.0 V V ' •••••• XP -SWMM Flow + Infiltration 2.0 - -- XP -SWMM Flow MCES -129; 2006 meter data MCES -129; 2012 meter data 0.0 0 1 2 3 Time (days) 4 5 6 7 Figure 2. 2006 and 2012 MCES -129 metered flow data with XP -SWMM modeled flow. \ \barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327GI3 \WorkFiles \SAC Availability \Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina -SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx W Figure 3. 2006 and 2012 monthly rainfall depth. \ \barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx R5—+ 10 9 VOO ■ 2006 2012 2006 _ 8 ` r 7 P eros meter i d � 2012 CL data collected Period meter c 6 data collected 1O w 5 M cc L 4 3 1 0 Ed Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Figure 3. 2006 and 2012 monthly rainfall depth. \ \barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327G13 \WorkFiles\SAC Availability\Memo - SE Edina \SE Edina - SAC Availability Memo - 072313 - 2.docx R5—+ Memorandum DATE: June 6, 2014 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Transportation Impacts City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -55 A Comprehensive Plan amendment was recently submitted to Metropolitan Council for the Lennar (6725 York Ave) project. During discussion with Metropolitan Council for that request they concluded that the City needed to establish new residential density ranges for the City's mixed use Districts, to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each of the Districts. As part of the review in establishing the residential density ranges, transportation impacts need to be considered. In general it can be concluded that: There is adequate roadway capacity to support the proposed residential density ranges in the mix use Districts. This finding is based on the following: 1. Per City Code, with each development proposal submitted to the City a detailed Traffic Study is required to document local and regional traffic impacts. These studies include evaluating the existing and forecasted 20 year roadway capacities. They take into account approved developments adjacent to the proposed project, as well as general traffic growth in the area. The studies will recommend any existing or future roadway mitigation required to accommodate the development. The studies are coordinated with Hennepin County and MnDOT if there roadways are impacted by the development proposal. 2. The City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan included forecasts based on households, population and employment for each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). The TAZ's do not align with specific land use districts and are based on anticipated developable land. In mixed use districts, although some of the household and population forecasts are low, the corresponding employment forecasts are high. Therefore if additional households are included in a specific District, the corresponding employment numbers would be reduced which would balance the traffic generation. Attached is the TAZ map from the City's Transportation Plan and a summary of the effected TAZ's with the forecasted current Transportation Plans, Households, Population and Employment compared to the 1999 Plan and that included in the current (2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model. 5-` � Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning n Construction WSSuite 701 Xenia Avenue South #300 - - Minneapolis, MN 55416 & Associates, Inc. Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum DATE: June 6, 2014 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Transportation Impacts City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -55 A Comprehensive Plan amendment was recently submitted to Metropolitan Council for the Lennar (6725 York Ave) project. During discussion with Metropolitan Council for that request they concluded that the City needed to establish new residential density ranges for the City's mixed use Districts, to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each of the Districts. As part of the review in establishing the residential density ranges, transportation impacts need to be considered. In general it can be concluded that: There is adequate roadway capacity to support the proposed residential density ranges in the mix use Districts. This finding is based on the following: 1. Per City Code, with each development proposal submitted to the City a detailed Traffic Study is required to document local and regional traffic impacts. These studies include evaluating the existing and forecasted 20 year roadway capacities. They take into account approved developments adjacent to the proposed project, as well as general traffic growth in the area. The studies will recommend any existing or future roadway mitigation required to accommodate the development. The studies are coordinated with Hennepin County and MnDOT if there roadways are impacted by the development proposal. 2. The City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan included forecasts based on households, population and employment for each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). The TAZ's do not align with specific land use districts and are based on anticipated developable land. In mixed use districts, although some of the household and population forecasts are low, the corresponding employment forecasts are high. Therefore if additional households are included in a specific District, the corresponding employment numbers would be reduced which would balance the traffic generation. Attached is the TAZ map from the City's Transportation Plan and a summary of the effected TAZ's with the forecasted current Transportation Plans, Households, Population and Employment compared to the 1999 Plan and that included in the current (2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model. 5-` Alj�f Transportation Analysis Zones ()y City of Edina, MN Legend QTransportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) l� Edina Boundary N - 1,500 3,000 w e WSB D Feet s &- * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON- RETAIL TOTAL RETAIL NON- RETAIL TOTAL 2000 2903 1997* 575 766 - - 3974 1.33 N 2009# 586 737 0 4056 4056 1.26 N "' 20 575 765 - - 3603 1.33 3085 2030^ 597 764 208 1016 1224 1.28 2965 2030# 636 916 650 3184 3834 1.44 * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON- RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 2000 2903 - - 3127 1.45 Ln 2009# 2009 2934 2576 2081 4657 1.46 V) N 20 2000 2905 - - 3191 1.45 2030^ 2039 3085 2525 2525 5050 1.51 2030# 2059 2965 2.525 2525 5050 1.44 * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON - RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 33 38 - - 6019 1.15 Ln 2009# 9 29 2692 3076 5768 3.22 N 2020* 65 130 - - 7156 2.00 2030^ 310 540 2420 3630 6050 1.74 2030# 509 733 2420 3630 6050 1.44 * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON - RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 993 1642 - - 6210 1.65 Ln 2009# 1014 1595 21 2608 2629 1.57 N 2020* 995 1650 - - 6690 1.66 2030^ 1044 1646 840 1 3960 1 4800 1.58 2030# 1064 1532 840 1 3960 1 4800 1.44 * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON - RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 447 670 - - 3219 1.50 00 2009# 454 695 402 11448 11850 1.53 N 2020* 445 675 - - 3716 1.52 2030^ 481 741 531 4460 4991 1.54 2030# 504 1149 1331 11201 12532 2.28 * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON - RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 1589 3393 - - 4506 2.14 00 2009# 1617 3540 128 3350 3478 2.19 N 2020* 1670 3575 - - 4637 2.14 2030^ 1963 4278 200 4300 4500 2.18 2030# 2192 3156 200 4300 4500 1.44 * - 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model ^ - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan g * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON- RETAIL. TOTAL 1997* 691 1792 - - - 3857 2.59 °4 2009" 713 1794 55 2615 2670 2.52 N 2020* 690 1805 - - 4658 2.62 F- 2030^ 729 1821 400 2900 3300. 2.50 2030" 731 1667 400 2900 3300 2.28 * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON - RETAIL TOTAL 1997* ` 1214 2980 - - 1200 2.45 N 2009# 1224 3200" 289 940 1229 2.61 N 2020* 1235 3050 - - 1433 2.47. F- 2030A 1299 .3327 320 960 1280 2.56 2030" 1349 3076 320 960 1280 2.28 * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP/ HH RETAIL NON- RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 748 1653 - - 1813 2.21 Ln r'4 2009" 623 1663 327 726 1053. 2.67, N 2020* 940 1 2170 - - 2105 2.31 F- 2030A .698 1790 360 780 1140 2.56 2030 748 1705 360 780 1140 2.28 * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON - RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 1159 2493 - - 1271 2.15 N 2009" 1170 2414 20 1493 1513 2.06 N 2020 *. 1160 2510 - - 1536 2.16 F- 2030^ 1186, 2441 50 1650 1 1700 2.06 2030" 1190 2713 50 1650 1700 2.28 * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON- RETAIL TOTAL 1997* 54 101 - - 11532 1.87 M 2009" 57 92 607 11746. 12353 1.61 N 2020* 55 100 1 - - 13700 1.82 - F- 2030A 358 603 1987 11263 .13250 1.68 2030" 557 802 1988 1 11263 13251 1.44 * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ JOBS HOUSEHOLDS POPULATION POP / HH RETAIL NON-.RETAIL', TOTAL 1997* 0 0 - - 948 - m 2009 0 0 12 2497 2509 - N 2020* 0 0 - - 1145 - 2030^ 30 51 13 1211 1224 1.70 # 50 72 50 5066 5116 1.44 * - 2030 1999 Edina Comprehensive. Plan "- Current (as of 2014) Metropolitan Council Travel Demand Model A - 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan _ 0 e OF THE EDINA. �° UNCIL TUESDAY; JANUARY 22, 2008 7:00 A.M Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 a.m. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also present were Planning Commissioners Brown, Fischer, Risser, Schroeder, Staunton, and Chair Lonsbury. Staff present included Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager, Cary Teague, Planning Director, Dan Cornejo, Comprehensive Plan Coordinator, and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to review the draft of the 2008 Comprehensive, Plan. Manager Hughes briefly outlined the history of the Comprehensive Plan revision to date. Dan Cornejo presented an overview of the changes made from the 1998 Comprehensive Plan and the draft of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. The Council; Planning Commissioners and Staff reviewed and discussed the draft plan as follows: • Improve. the definitions of "step down' and "step back" in Land Use and Community Design chapter. "Step down" means that buildings should step down to, the sidewalk; "step back" means that buildings should step back from nearby and adjacent lower- height residential areas. A drawing or photo will be added to help illustrate the term. Clarify bonus height and density - developers would need to earn either in exchange for • 450 acres or about 5% of the city could change in terms of land use and densities. The other 95% is not recommended to change. The draft Plan does comment that within this 95 %, and possibly within the other 5 %, there could be proposals to make smaller zoning changes to facilitate the provision of affordable housing, lifecycle housing to accommodate seniors' needs. However, the draft Plan does not call for immediate zoning changes, nor does it specify certain areas for these changes. This point was emphasized: NO changes are recommended in the single- family areas. • The height maps need an accompanying narrative text that details what heights are recommended for which areas. • Change map on page 4 -50, regarding the Cahill area: the OR area should be 12 -16 stories, and the GMU area should be 375 stories. • Develop better definition of lifecycle housing and inclusionary housing. • Potential links between height- density- transportation. • Mixed used development.and its future potential • What, if any zoning changes would be implied by the Housing Chapter. Plan would be a- policy or visioning document. • Receipt and review of the recently written Energy and Environment chapter CITY VF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street.* Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov a 952- 927- 8861• -• Fax 952- 826 -0389 Minutes Stu4y Session anu 22 20 • Discussion that .Plan would be e direction, and offer broader policy rnR �. future changes. • Several language revisions were suggested to be incorporated on specific pages that staff will, incorporate into the Plan. • Small Area Plans were briefly discussed including how to formally remove the small area° plans from the existing plan. The Mayor and Council offered their thanks, to the Planning Commissioners for their work on the update to the Plan: Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk CITY OFEDINA, 2 4801 West 50th Street • Edina,'Minnesota 55424 www.EdiiiaMN.gov -'95217927-88'61 Fax 952 = 826 -0389 OF THE SP EDIP IG OF THE CIL HELD Al MARCH 27, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the special meeting was to allow residents to comment on the proposed draft update of the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Following the hearing, he said there would be a forty -five day written public comment period. The Council was at the beginning of their work on the update to the Comprehensive Plan. John Lonsbury, 6716 Southdale Road, Planning Commission Chair, used PowerPoint and presented the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. Dan Cornejo, Comprehensive Planning Consultant, Planning Director Teague and Assistant Manager Worthington offered clarifications and comments in response to questions of the Council. Public Comment Arrie Larsen Manti, President, Edina Chamber of Commerce, 7701 Normandale Road Suite 101, stated that the Chamber hoped the City continued to work with business in Edina. She referred to the three entities: the Edina School District, the City of Edina and Edina businesses that must work together. Ms. Manti said 51,000 persons come into Edina Monday through Friday to work with mostly a positive effect. Ms. Manti said the Edina Chamber and businesses thanked the Planning Commission and city staff for the hard work and expressed their hope to be able to continue the working relationship that makes Edina a premier place to work and live. John Elliot, 5904 Lee Valley Road, stated his concerns over increased traffic that would result from an increase in density and added if his concerns were not listened to, he may have to move out of Edina. Ronald Rich, 7008 West Shore Drive, stated he was having a problem with the projected increased density seeming incongruous with what appeared to be the small projected population increase. Mr. Rich said that tall towers do not represent Edina and something was not being planned correctly and was off track. He said he did not want high density in Edina and asked for an answer to why it was being projected. Cassandra Mihalchick, 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway, said she was the President of the Cahill Lewis Neighborhood Association with over 500 members. She stated the concerns of the Association regarding the proposed Draft Comp Plan. They included concern over increased density, potential high rises, and affordable housing. The Association would refute that adding more affordable housing or low income housing to our current mix outweigh the concrete negatives of the lower average tax base, more traffic and more pressure on the Edina infrastructure. She said that achieving Edina should be something to work towards and not automatically granted. The Association would oppose any density bonuses to developers building affordable housing. The Housing Section of the Plan was out of sync with the desires of the Edina citizens. They particularly 6j"t64I "nosed plans for the Cahill Gardens. 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 95 -f 861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, said of Edina residents had been integrated into e plan an people o no wan a ou a e or Cahill. Height was the most contentious issue and important point of the plan. The landscape will be affected by what was done permanently. The Plan projected the wishes of the Comp Plan Task Force and Planning Commission, but not the residents. He said that the consultants and planners vision was what the Draft Plan contained and that the citizens were not represented by the drafters of the proposed plan. Jerry Paar, 6201 Virginia Avenue South, said that he had attended the quadrant meeting held earlier and specifically asked about the Valley View and Wooddale Area. In the information provided that evening, the traffic was estimated to increase by 6,000 vehicles per day. Mr. Paar asked where increased traffic would come from and why affordable housing was proposed to be increased. He noted that the Met Council would not require the City to increase their affordable housing by over 500 units. He stated he thought the plan was untried and said he found it flawed to be told that the choice was between lower buildings that would use up the green space or taller buildings that would block out the sun and not allow green space. Doug Mayo, 6041 Kellogg Avenue South, said he was Chair of Edina Housing Task Force that had drafted the Housing Succession Plan. Mr. Mayo clarified that the 500 units of increased housing in the proposed plan would include 288 units of life cycle housing (this was housing that will be purchased by families earning between $47,000 and over $90,000) and 212 units of affordable housing (for person with incomes at 60% of median income or less). He said the affordable housing would be similar to what is already in Edina, such as Yorkdale, Centennial Lake, South Haven and some other apartment. He suggested there was a need for family and life cycle housing in Edina. Bill Griffith, representing TE Miller Development, 7900 Xerxes Avenue, Bloomington, offered compliments on the comprehensive public process being followed by the Council and staff during the Comprehensive Plan Update. He stated there were issues with the area around Southdale and the loss of development potential. He suggested the Council consider his March 24, 2008 letter stating a reduction in FAR would result in a down - zoning without compensation. Ron Miller, 6921 York Avenue, owner of property at 7716 France Avenue, suggested that if the goal of the new plan was to see projects built with certain features, only a true density bonus system would work. He warned decrease in FAR would cause landowners to keep what they have or build all retail. Susan Covnick, 4715 Golf Terrace, said she was disappointed by behavior she observed. Ms. Covnick stated Edina was unique because it does not want change that was constantly being attempted to be foisted on the citizens. She said people are upset, angry and disappointed because they do not want the proposed changes. Ms. Covnick said people were there because they loved Edina and did not want to change. Vivian Talghader, 7504 Hyde Park Drive, asked if the Council was considering the plan in part or as a whole. If changes were made to the draft plan would public input be sought at that point. She also asked if the plan were adopted would the City be held accountable to the Plan and if neighbors directly affected by small area plans would be notified when the plans were under consideration. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 95?> -RJg -§861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Jane Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, r but needs to think further in the future a must aaaress energy etriciency draft plan only went out ten years, change. She suggested the plan r ana water e Al Kluesner, 6417 Colony Way, suggested that if most of the re- development over the next ten years would be occurring south of TH62 and east of Cahill, the City Council become more pro- active in getting representation on boards and commissions from that area. Maire Katyal, 5177 Abercrombie Drive, said she was a former designer and planner in the State of Texas. She asked that the stress on the schools by additional development be considered. Ms. Katyal added that she would prefer owner - occupied housing and was opposed to more rental housing in the Cahill area. She asked that one West 70th Street higher buildings be set back from homes for light and air. Virginia Borgeson, 6216 Ewing Avenue South, said she understood the goal of the Updated Comprehensive Plan and stated residents did not want increased density. She objected to the Comprehensive Plan removing decision - making from the residents and giving it to the City Council. She said she objected to the plan satisfying the desires of the developers. She also objected to increasing mixed -use plans, and cited numerous pages in the draft plan to which she objected. Linda George, 5145 Tifton Drive, stated she did not feel there was neighborhood input from her neighborhood in the Comp Plan. She said that the persons drafting the Comprehensive Plan understand the impact of the traffic on Brookview Heights. She suggested that individual notices should be sent to each household in Edina notifying them of the update to the Comprehensive Plan. She also objected to tall buildings and said they would have a negative impact on adjacent neighborhoods. Sharon Ming, 1103 Coventry Place, said she was disturbed by comments about not wanting change. Edina has already changed many times from agrarian community to post -war suburb to the present. Ms. Ming stated change would come no matter what and she felt the proposed Comp Plan was an opportunity to embrace the change. She urged inclusion of affordable housing, encouraging diversity in age and economics as a way to maintain Edina's vitality. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, noted that tugging and pulling were typical of planning. He said that several things have come out of the process. Using the graphic, he noted some changes that. have been completed. Mr. Bohan suggested the promenade area be finalized, expressed concern over heights of buildings and suggested heights be limited to four stories until the study was completed. Linda Presthus, 4521 Belvidere Lane, asked for clarification of the question of whether the City of Edina was bound by statute of any kind to add 212 affordable housing units between the years of 2011 and 2020. Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, agreed with Ms. Ming and suggested Edina should shape the future changes rather than react to them. He suggested the future be shaped with lower densities and lower height building. Higher density will lead to more traffic without increasing the infrastructure to the area that has already been saturated. He urged the restriction of building heights and density. Michael Fischer, 4512 Dunham Drive, stated he was a member of the Planning Commission and Comp an I a- s orce. He sai i so o Crosstown an ea , reminding people that the Comp Plan Task force R ft Edina citizens. He clarified what was 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov - 950ig-§861 - Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 27, 2008 proposed in the land use section of the p required by the Met Council, an additic lousing. The 212 units were affordable were for people earning an average would be made up of teachers, fire fighters and dental hygienists. Mr. Fischer said that Edina would not stop traffic growth because Edina was surrounded by growing communities peopled by commuters who have learned that Edina streets were better than the freeway system. He pointed out that the Edina Schools were bringing in 1,000 students annually because there were not enough students in Edina which pointed to a need for life cycle housing. Peggy Buxton, 7500 Cahill Road, said she has been a 40 year resident and has seen a great deal of change. She said she lived on the first floor facing east of her property and said that a building even three stories would block the sun on her building. She suggested lower building heights. John Snyder, 5705 Lois Lane, said that a registered sex offered lived close to his property. He asked about the low income units and who would move into to them, expressing concern about the safety of his children. He asked the Council to explain why his fears were unfounded or if it was thought there was some merit in them, then why proceed and put the safety of young children at risk. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing, noting the written record would remain open for 45 days. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland reviewed the questions asked by the citizens. The staff answered the questions and discussed the answers with the Council. Following the discussion Mr. Hughes suggested the forty-five day written comment period would remain open until May 12, 2008. The Council consensus for beginning their work on the draft plan following the comment period noting their first work session would be held at 5:00 p.m. on May 20, 2008, preceding the regular meeting. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov - 9-13aW43861 - Fax 952 - 826 -0389 EDI /�� •1►�� �� I� .�1 HE Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members- Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Dan Cornejo, Planning Consultant; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to discuss the Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed the plan of action to review the Comprehensive Plan. Consensus was to start with land use at the meeting on June 3, 2008, at 5:00 p.m. Topics of discussion would include: • Height • Density • Setbacks /design issues - -i.e. closeness to street, parking • Small Area Plans • Height and density incentives, and how they work in other jurisdictions • Basis for legal change in zoning incentives • How mixed use works in the Twin Cities market, especially with housing over commercial? The discussion at the work session on June 17, 2008, 5 p.m., would be housing. The topics would include: • Housing type methodology • Ownership vs. Rental • Accessory dwelling units - -would they work in any area in Edina, or be confined to certain areas • Mandatory Inclusionary Zoning • Methodology /philosophy of 500 additional affordable units • Location of Affordable Housing • Use of the phrase "Over Housing" • "Accessibility" issues • Implementation chapter inconsistencies The discussion at the work session on July 1, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., would be Assumptions. The discussion at the work session on July 15, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., would be Transportation. The topics would include: • "Access" issues • Functional Classification as a basis for traffic and vehicle count data The Council discussed the joint work session with the School Board on June 16, 2008. City Manager Hughes informed the City Council that one meeting would be needed to discuss the budget. The Council discussed and made a decision to change the May 27, 2008, work session to 12:30 p.m. The purpose of that work session would be the Public Works facility. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0,%pe M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk qs, Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also present: Planning Commissioners John Lonsbury and Michael Fischer. Staff present included: Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; City Attorney, Roger Knutson and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to discuss the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Member Masica led off stating that she felt height was an issue that needed to be discussed. She brought to the meeting a large map received from a constituent that she used to point out the height of various buildings in the Cahill area. The Council discussed various aspects of building heights with staff and the Planning Commissioners. It was noted that the Cahill Industrial Area (east of Cahill Road, west of Hwy 100 and north of 1 -494) was an area where the draft plan noted a potential for increased density. The Council discussed the following acceptable heights for the area: three stories, east side of Cahill and south side of 70th Street and the neighbors would not object to eight stories adjacent to Hwy 100. Discussion also included: increasing green space in relation to increasing height, impact of change in one neighborhood affecting adjacent neighborhoods, the vibrancy of neighborhood adjacent to freeways, whether or not zoning would need to change if the comprehensive plan changed the designation of an area (the City would have nine months to change zoning and then only change zoning if in conflict with plan), mixed use development, residential over retail development, whether industrial areas should be retained, purpose of the Comprehensive Plan to give guidance to developers and protection to residents, need to balance uses (i.e. commercial, industrial, residential), residents' desire to not increase height or density, development of vision, need for small area plans and maintenance of infrastructure. The Council agreed the Cahill Industrial area from the railroad tracks to Highway 100 should be included in a small area study, there should be a maximum height of three stories and the zoning should not change. Future work sessions should review other potential areas of change including: Southdale area, 44th Street and France Avenue, the Grandview area, France Avenue north of Highway 62, and Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Debra Mangen, City Clerk is OF THE WOheWON OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 17, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager, Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to continue discussion of the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Member Masica stated she was uncomfortable allowing residential uses in conjunction with commercial and industrial uses and therefore opposed permitting residential uses in the industrial and commercial area. The Council discussed the area bordered by Metro Boulevard on the east, West 70th Street on the north, Cahill Road on the west, and West 78th Street on the south. The issues included: existing and potential allowable heights of buildings in the area, current zoning of the area designated NC in the draft comp plan, effect of changing zoning on property values, existing and potential floor area ratio (FAR), desire to preserve commercial /industrial uses in Edina, the zoning should stay as it was in the area described in the plan as NC', the area designated "GMU should maintain light. industrial and commercial without residential, mixed land use concept, and uses that would be allowed within an industrial zoning designation. Staff and Council also discussed Small Area Plan Studies and Potential Areas of Change that might trigger such studies. It was noted that the draft Comp Plan might be less prescriptive if it were to read "the City Council may direct staff to conduct a Small Area Plan Study in certain areas comprised of multiple parcels and /or identified as Potential Areas of Change within the Comp Plan." The Council pointed out several corrections /revisions to the draft Comp Plan which staff will incorporate into the document. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Debra Mangen, City Clerk 1* MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 22, 2008 7:00 A.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 a.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Roger Knutson, City Attorney, briefly joined the meeting between approximately 10:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to continue review of the Land Use chapter of the Draft Comprehensive Plan Update 2008 The Council discussed the area described as the greater Southdale Area bordered by the City's easterly and southerly boundaries, by TH 62 to the north and generally one parcel of land in depth west of France Avenue. The issues included: density, whether or not Floor Area Ratio should be adjusted, heights of buildings, buildings that would have a tower stepping down to a podium on the edges of the development nearer the street, setback, existing zoning, potential changes in zoning, the importance of encouraging a pedestrian friendly environment, concern regarding maintaining the vibrancy of the area, and infrastructure improvements potentially triggered by re- development or density changes. Staff noted that when speaking of building height, building codes allow stick -built method of construction for buildings up to four stories, that buildings five and six stories were allowed to use a transitional type of construction, but buildings taller than six stories required full masonry construction. Acceptable heights based on the draft plan were suggested and staff recorded those changes. The Council asked Attorney Knutson if an existing 13 story building would be rebuilt, how many stories high statute would allow. Mr. Knutson responded the law would allow the building to be rebuilt to the same height. It was also noted that affordable housing would be favorably received in the residential areas. The Council felt it would be good to take time to reflect upon what the appropriate heights should be in the area. Member Housh left the meeting at 9:10 a.m. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 10:40 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 4, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Director. of Planning; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to continue review of the Land Use chapter of the Draft Comprehensive Plan Update 2008. Member Masica commented that she would not be at the September 2, 2008, Council meetings. Staff recapped the results of the July 22, 2008, work session dealing with the greater Southdale area of the city. The Council finished their discussion of appropriate heights in the area and staff recorded the suggested heights. Some items from the discussion included: the ability to maintain the vibrancy of the area, potential future ownership of Southdale, community vision for Edina did not embrace height, traffic congestion, and differing heights of individual stories effect on the overall height of the building, desire to maintain or increase green space, and the desire to encourage pedestrian friendly redevelopment if possible. After concluding their discussion of the greater Southdale area, the Council next began the review of the France corridor north of Trunk Highway 62. Discussion included the regional medical district, FAR in the regional medical district, the office residential district in this area and scheduling of future work sessions on the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 19, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to continue the review of the Land Use Chapter of the draft Comprehensive Plan. Council reviewed the outcomes of their previous discussions of the Land Use Chapter. Council discussion included: desire for a list of consensus items, concern about Regional Medical District zoning and density, future development of small area plans after the Comp Plan had been approved, and the need to potentially amend zoning regulations to coincide with the Comp Plan. It was decided that the neighborhood commercial nodes (50th & France, Wooddale and Valley View Road, 44th and France; 70th and Cahill and Grandview) would remain with the same land designations and overall heights as currently existed until small area plans had been completed. Assistant Manager Worthington reviewed briefly the comments received from Three Rivers Park District and the Metropolitan Council on the Edina Draft Comprehensive Plan. Areas for which small area plans would be completed in the future included: 50th & France, Wooddale & Valley View, 44th & France, Cahill & 70th, Grandview, and 541h & France. There was also discussion of whether or not Southdale should be considered for a small area plan. The Council discussed whether the work of the Comprehensive Plan Task Force was being ignored, the community vision for Edina and the need to keep moving forward with the review of the draft plan. The tentative future schedule follows: September 16th at 5:00 p.m. - Housing Chapter, September 23rd, 7:00 a.m. Study Session, Transportation, October 7th at 5:00 p.m. Parks & Open Spaces and October 21St at 5:00 p.m. Wrap Up. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE STUDY SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 23, 2008 7:00 A.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 A.M. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Attending from the Edina Transportation Commission were Geof Workinger and Jennifer Janovy (also on the Bike Edina Task Force) and Sara Jacobs from the Bike Edina Task Force. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Jack Sullivan, Assistant Engineer; Chuck Rickart, WSB, Consultant; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to review the Transportation Chapter of the draft Comprehensive Plan. Member Masica commented that there was a rumor circulating there was no intention to finish the review of the draft Comp Plan by year end. Mayor Hovland said he believed the Council was to finish their work in October and submit the draft plan to Met Council by November. Manager Hughes assured the Council there was no intent to defer a decision on the draft plan until 2009. He stated staff was willing to meet whenever the Council desired to complete the review. He suggested that the Council also discuss whether they want to hold a public hearing on the revised draft plan. The Council conducted a review of Chapter 7 Transportation Plan. Included in the discussion were: Edina's functional classification of roadways and its difference with Met Council's listing of functional classification of roadways, how the functional classification was developed, criteria used to derive terms with which streets and roads have been labeled, how changing roadway classification could impact availability of state or federal funds, desire for development of an overarching narrative to describe departure from functional classification, Bike Edina Task Force Comprehensive Bike Plan and its need for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan, need to review draft plan for consistency of terminology and references between chapters, Traffic Demand Management Plans development and use, crash reduction strategies for major trouble points, working with various agencies and jurisdictions on 25 mph speed limit, transportation as it relates to transit, speed reduction strategy for school zones, development of park and ride locations and possible funding sources for updating TH 62 interchange. Staff noted suggested revisions and corrections during the review. The Council discussed the timing and process for adopting a final draft of the Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council. They felt they could review the remaining chapters: Heritage Preservation, Water Resources, Park, Energy and Environment and Community Services in one more work session set for 5:00 p.m. October 7, 2008. The Council will e-mail any issues to the City Manager regarding these chapters by September 30, 2008. The issues will be consolidated to facilitate discussion on October 7m It was decided that the revisions will be completed and the revised red -lined draft will be submitted to the Council in its entirety in late October. The updated draft will also be posted online. The Council will give staff any final updates November 3, 2008, and those will also be posted on the web as soon as possible. It was anticipated that a hearing date would be set for November 18, 2008, to consider the final draft and presumably approve that draft for submission to Met Council. Member Masica left the meeting at 9:45 a.m. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:05 a. M. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to the review the Housing Chapter of the draft Comprehensive Plan. Council discussion included: Housing Task Force's development of the Housing Succession Plan, Housing Task Force's goal of 500 units, Metro Livable Communities Act goal of 212 affordable units, percentage of Edina housing currently at an affordable price, definition of affordable housing, inclusionary zoning and its meaning and implications, and the desire that affordable housing be ownership vs. rental, concern over allowing two housing units to be developed in single family dwellings, how school district demographics affect Edina's population, and life -cycle housing and ability to allow residents to age in place within Edina. The Council pointed out changes and inconsistencies to the Housing Chapter that were recorded by staff. Staff will review the draft plan for consistency throughout the chapters after incorporating the changes. It was noted the Transportation Chapter would be reviewed at the September 23, 2008, Study Session to be held at 7:00 a.m. Council requested that Geoff Workinger and Steve Brown of the Edina Transportation Commission be invited along with Kirk Johnson and other members of the Bike Edina Task Force. The meeting would be held in the Edina Community Room located on the second floor of City Hall. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 7, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh was absent. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Public Works Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief; Mike Siitari, Police Chief; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to review the remaining chapters of the draft Comprehensive Plan. The Council worked through Chapters 6, Heritage Preservation; Chapter 7, Transportation; Chapter 8, Water Resources Management; Chapter 9, Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources; Chapter 10, Energy and Environment; Chapter 11, Community Services and Facilities; and Chapter 12, Implementation. Several items were noted by staff. Council members supplied staff with notes of typos and clerical errors to be corrected into the final document. The revised red -lined draft will be sent out to the Council on Friday October 24, 2008, with the November 3, 2008, work session devoted to a final review of the document. At the regular meeting on November 3, 2008, a public hearing will be scheduled for November 18, 2008. Written comment will also be accepted on the draft document. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk Minutes /Edina Citv Council /October 21. 2008 The Council discussion included: the depth of the monitoring wells were 15 -17 feet deep; any purchaser of this property would request a no- action letter since the property issues needed to be resolved with ConAgra; the MPCA might require ConAgra to conduct additional investigations, perhaps to determine if this substance originated from this property or was the result of a flow from other properties; and that sale of bonds at this time would be premature since it could be six months before the no- action letter would be issued. Mr. Hughes advised that the budget included a debt service levy in anticipation of selling these bonds later this fall or during 2009. In December, the Council will make the decision whether or not to have a debt service levy start in 2009 in anticipation of selling the bonds. The Council noted the market in six months cannot be predicted at this time and the amendment would give the unilateral decision whether or not to sell bonds. The Council questioned whether the seller would be willing to issue an environmental assurance for unknown conditions. Mr. Hughes advised it was too early for such a negotiation with ConAgra, but there were different kinds of no- action letters and, based on the type issued, it was possible the City may negotiate additional assurances from ConAgra. The Council discussed the potential need for and cost of ground water remediation and noted that once the no- action letter was issued, the MPCA would still have the ability to require action under certain circumstances. The Council noted the amendment: would provide an additional 60 days of due diligence after the no- action letter comes forward, would provide the City with flexibility in deciding what to do about environmental issues, and the $100,000 would be returned if the City determined to not proceed to closing. Staff was directed to provide the Council with additional bond levy information to assist with that decision, noting it had until December 16, 2008, to make that decision. It was noted there were substantial savings in capitalized interest costs when this was considered previously. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to approve an amendment to the purchase agreement for 7450 Metro Boulevard to extend the closing date; extend the due diligence period until 60 days after the issuance of the no- action letter for the City to evaluate its sufficiency and to arrange financing for the acquisition; and, permit the City to terminate the agreement if it determined that the no- action letter was not acceptable or financing feasible prior to the end of the extended due diligence period. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. UPDATE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASS SYSTEM Engineer /Public Works Director Houle advised that the Functional Class System in the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan does not match the Metropolitan Council's mapping, which became apparent during the Metropolitan Council's pre- review. At that time, staff explained the functional class map was identical with the 1999 Comprehensive Plan and staff did not know Metropolitan Council's mapping had changed when redone three years ago. Mr. Houle stated staff and Peter Langworthy of WSB met with Metropolitan Council staff and it was determined that Edina either needed to replicate in its Plan the Metropolitan Council map and functional classifications or request approval for map changes from the Metropolitan Council and its Technical Advisory Board. Mr. Houle displayed the Metropolitan Council's current mapping, explained how it differed from Edina's mapping, and presented staffs recommendations for agreements with Metropolitan Council classifications and requests for change. He also explained the hierarchy of road classifications and how they were categorized, noting the advantage of funding tied to A -minor arterial roadways. The Council discussion included: the number of vehicles per day carried by collector (1,000 to 15,000) and B -minor arterial roadways (5,000 to 30,000); funding advantage for A -minor arterial roadways; impact of land use concentrations of residential or commercial /retail developments on road classifications; the importance of connectivity and standard consistency; concern about function of the roadway going forward; and, risks to residents who live on those roadways. The Council noted that when Edina was built, it was the outer suburb so future construction of the roadway system to outer areas had not been envisioned. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2008 Peter Langworthy, WSB, explained the classification was based on the amount of traffic the roadway carried. He advised there were not clear -cut mandates that an arterial must have certain design criteria. Rather, there were guiding principals, and if a roadway was designated as a collector as opposed to a B -minor arterial, it would not have a major change on how that roadway would be designed moving forward. He noted Edina was a mature City with a mature roadway system. Mr. Langworthy said certain roadways, due to basic features and development had regional significance. For example, a road that had an interchange at one end and major commercial enterprise at the other end, would be of regional significance. The Council noted that twenty percent of the City's mileage of roadways was designated as Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways. Additionally, all of the road segments being discussed, with the exception of 58th Street, were on the MSA system. The Council expressed concern that changing a designation from collector to another status expanded the potential for future developmental capability. Mr. Houle suggested the future land use had been identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed that the Comprehensive Plan required the City to adequately control access points to the regional roadway system, and the Comprehensive Plan would establish and more clearly define the connection between land use and transportation. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to recommend the following functional classifications to the Metropolitan Council: • That A -1 CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue South /Gleason Road) from TH 62 (Crosstown) to TH 100 be upgraded to an A -Minor Arterial Roadway; • That B -1 York Avenue So. /Xerxes Avenue from TH62 to South City Limit and B -7 Valley View Road/West 69th Street from West 66th Street to CSAH 31 (York Avenue South) be upgraded to B -Minor Arterial Roadways • That B -2 Blake Road /Interlachen Road from the north City limits /Spruce Road to Vernon Avenue, B -3 Londonderry Road /Lincoln Drive/Vernon Avenue South from TH169 to Gleason Road, B-4 Cahill Road from West 78th Street to West 70th Street, B -5 West 70th Street from Cahill Road to CSAH 17 (France Avenue), B -6 Normandale RoadiValley View Road from Benton Avenue to TH 62 (Crosstown) be designated Collector Streets Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION POSTPONED - PETITION TO NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT FOR STREAM BANK STABILIZATION The Council questioned whether submission of a petition to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD) would be in conflict with work of Bike Edina Task Force to establish a bike trail in this area. Engineer /Public Works Director Houle explained that for the last two years, the NMCWD had asked Edina staff to submit a petition, which would open funding for CIP projects. He explained the NMCWD's project was to stabilize the banks from erosion, to realign the Creek in some areas, and to add a trail where it would match the Three Rivers trails. The Council expressed concern that the two projects may not be compatible. Mr. Houle noted that a project had not yet been identified and while Three Rivers had not committed funding to a trail, they had started a preliminary review of the feasibility and potential location for a trail. City Manager Hughes advised that the Manager of the NMCWD had encouraged Edina to submit this petition, which would provide another source of funds into the corridor that did not exist today. This was the mechanism that cities used, a petition process to access the levy authority of the watershed district. He noted that Edina was one of the last communities to take advantage of this process. The Council discussed that residents have not indicated support for a bank stabilization project but have asked why there was not a bike trail in Edina or park land to bike between, as identified formally in the community survey. The Council noted the City's budget constraints and past discussion to cut $25,000 from trail maintenance, even though construction of more trails and maintaining current trails was identified as a top priority by Edina residents. It was also noted that Edina taxpayers contribute Page 7 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 3, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works; John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director; Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer; and Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director. �M� yYor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to review the draft oom e �P6a The Council reviewed the "Definitions" section of the draft Comprehensive Plan and the following chapters: Introduction; Vision, Goals and Objectives; Community Profile: Population, Housing and Employment; and Land Use and Community Design. Council discussion included proper definitions of the terms "sustainability," "CIP" and "PUD" in the "Definitions section;" typographical errors in Chapter 2; population projections and the concept of "overhousing" in Chapter 3; and desirability by the community of mixed -use developments in Chapter 4. The Council pointed out that graphics and tables in Chapter 3 were labeled as being comparisons of "similar communities," when they should have been labeled "adjacent communities." Staff will review the draft plan for consistency throughout the chapters. The Council revised two Land Use Policies in Chapter 4. Staff will make changes consistent with Council direction. It was noted that additional work sessions will of the draft Comprehensive Plan. All sessio public hearing. be scheduled to complete the Council's review is will be scheduled before the Dec. 2, 2008 Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 13, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to or Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Assistant City Manager; Wayne Houle, Keprios, Park and Recreation Director; Teague, Planning Director; and Jennife r Director. der at 5 p.m. in the Community Room of City Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, City Engineer /Director of Public Works; John Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer; Cary Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Mayor Hovland said t purpose of the work session was to continue to review the draft omnrPive Plan, The Council began by continuing its review of the Land Use and Community Design chapter. The "Implementation" and "Housing" chapters were also reviewed. Council discussion included the expression of building height, the maximum height of the high- density residential area west of France Avenue, the maximum height of the industrial area east of Cahill Road, development review process and affordable housing. The Council was reminded that heights in some commercial areas were not analyzed as much as in other areas because staff was directed to conduct small area plans after adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Time did not permit such plans to be developed along with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff will make changes consistent with Council direction. It was noted that an additional work session will be held 5 p.m. Nov. 18 to complete the Council's review of the draft Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 18 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works; John Keprios, Park and Recreation Director; Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer; Cary Teague, Planning Director; and Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications and Marketing Director. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to continue to review the draft &=Kehehsive�.._ The Council continued its review of the draft plan beginning with Chapter 7, Transportation. Council discussion included the methodology used to model traffic volume projections, consensus that streets described as collector or above become residential thoroughfares, steps needed to remedy impaired waters, whether Todd Park should be downgraded to a neighborhood park and the status of Chapter 10, Energy and Environment. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 2008 member cities do receive LGA. The issue of eminent domain was discussed, and the position of Metro Cities was read, noting it softened that language. Member Masica advised that at a regional level, Metro Cities had to take a stance for the majority of its member cities. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to appoint Council Member Masica as Edina's voting representative at the Metro Cities Policy Adoption Meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE (NOVEMBER 18, 2008) SET — APPEAL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DENIAL OF VARIANCE — SIGNAGE SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to approve setting the hearing date for an appeal of a denial of a variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals for signage at the Southdale Medical Building, 6545 France Avenue, for the November 18, 2008, Council meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. . HEARING DATES SET: 1. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE APPEAL EDINA REALTY, 3930 49% STREET WEST (DECEMBER 16, 2008); 2. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT — GALLERIA SHOPPING CENTER (NOVEMBER 16, 2008) City Manager Hughes explained the applicant submitted a letter indicating the Edina Realty project, approved at the last meeting, also required a variance that was to be heard on November 6, 2008. However, due to the applicant's schedule, the Board of Appeals cannot consider the application until November 20, 2008, so the applicant had requested the hearing be set for a December meeting date. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve setting the hearing date for the final development plan and variance appeal of Edina Realty, 2920 49% Street West, for the December 16, 2008, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve setting the hearing date for the preliminary and final plat for the Galleria Shopping Center for the November 18, 2008, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. HEART G- DATEJOECEMBE -2, 2008) SET — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - ayor Hovland advised that-additiattai- workrerrfafned on the Comprehensive Plan, so it was recommended the public hearing be rescheduled. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to schedule a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan for the December 2, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. REPORT ON CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Mayor Hovland reported the Council held three meetings to review nine categories of general performance for the City Manager. The Council used a summary performance rating scale and confirmed that Mr. Gordon was ranked in the "very good" to "outstanding" categories in all areas. It was noted that the City Manager did not receive a pay increase in 2008. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to adjust the City Manager salary for 2008 by a 3.5% increase, retroactive to January 1, 2008. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *FEASIBILITY REPORT RECEIVED AND PUBLIC HEARING SET (DECEMBER 2, 2008) — RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -114 APPROVED FRANCE AVENUE SIDEWALK Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -114 Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2, 2008 Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2008 -115, Resolution Approving a Final Plat for a Registered Land Survey for the Galleria. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rolicall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. and ordered placed on f 1e_ . - - -- — - - - - - -- Mayor Hovland thanked the many citizens and groups for their participation and hard work in drafting the Comprehensive Plan. Assistant City Manager Worthington re,ewed stated that in late 2006 the City undertook "n,6 -,mess to update the Comprehensive Plan as required by State Statute. She advised reviewed Gf the process taken, used, led by the Planning Commission, task force groups, citizens, staff members and consultants. The Council received the draft Comprehensive Plan on March 3, 2008, had now completed its review, and directed staff to schedule a public hearing for December 2, 2008. Ms. Worthington stated if the draft resolution was approved, the Comprehensive Plan would be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its review process, which could take up to one year. When completed, the Council would be asked to adopt the Comprehensive Plan sometime in 2009 and then make Zoning Code amendments within nine months to comply with the guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. Public Testimony Sharon Ming, 1103 Coventry Place, stated she was a 27 -year resident and served on the Human Rights and Relations Commission for 19 years. She also served on the Housing Task Force that helped draft the Housing Section of this Plan. Ms. Ming detailed the open process created by the Council that included over a hundred volunteers, hundreds of committee meetings and public listening sessions. These meetings were attended by hundreds of citizens who provided creative input that would guide the City's development and growth over the next 10 -15 years. Ms. Ming estimated that 120 meetings were held and at a value of $25 per hour, there was probably $100,000 worth of free volunteer time from people with expertise. Ms. Ming asserted that over the last nine months, since the Council undertook its review of the Plan, the Council had subverted its own public process. She suggested the Council made substantial changes without the benefit of community input and did not release the final draft to the public until just eight days ago, over the Thanksgiving weekend. Ms. Ming stated she felt this draft of the Comprehensive Plan had a lot of background and history; however, very little vision or strategy and very few ideas about what Edina wanted to see happen over next 10 -15 years. She encouraged the Council not to approve or submit this Plan to the Metropolitan Council because it would not serve Edina well. Cappy Moore, 6768 Valley View Road, stated she was a 24 -year resident and in 2000 was one of four residents representing three area churches who met to discuss Edina's housing situations through the eyes of the faith community who wondered what Edina would look like if it became more diverse. She advised of the 30-40 meetings that were held over the next seven years including two public forums in 2004. Ms. Moore stated that Council Member Masica attended a public forum and had indicated her surprise to see 150 people in favor of affordable housing. Mayor Hovland had attended the 2006 public forum and gave the key address about change coming to Edina, a first -ring suburb, and the need to keep Edina moving into the future. Ms. Moore noted the public had spoken for more affordable housing, but it was cut from the Comprehensive Plan. She reviewed her involvement to attend meetings with diverse groups who spoke of their desire for an economically diverse city. Ms. Moore asked what happened to the Edina's vision and stated she did not understand why the Council disregarded the work charged to the Task Force and the public's input. She stated that as a member of a strong united faith community, a Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2. 2008 Task Force member, and mother to six grown children, she believed there was room in Edina for families, single moms with one income wanting a secure environment, and newly- arrived immigrants. Ms. Moore stated Edina would be a better community for saying "yes" to those who want a new life in Edina. She asked the Council to be responsive to the work and moral fiber of this community and to reconsider and look with fresh eyes at the recommendations originally presented in the Comprehensive Plan. Sister Mary Madonna Ashton, 4401 Valley View Road, Apartment 2, stated she was a 26 -year resident and excited to attend meetings about the Comprehensive Plan that showed an effort to revitalize the community by encouraging young families, professionals and skilled workers to live as well as work in Edina. Sister Ashton stated that young people were needed to revitalize the community and asked the Council to explain why, in Chapter 5, Section 10, the goals stated by the Housing Task Force and unanimously approved by the Council to study in 2006 got scraped from the Comprehensive Plan. She stated she was very disappointed. Sally Krusell, 6229 Hanson Road, stated she was a 24 -year resident who moved to Edina from Highland Park because she wanted her daughter to attend Edina schools. She was a single parent and served on the Housing Task Force, spent a lot of time volunteering and bringing in experts who volunteered their time to provide information. Ms. Krusell stated she was floored by all that was cut from the Housing Plan and asked why she wasted her time as a volunteer. She read a portion of the Housing Succession Plan indicating: "mix of housing types and values was necessary to insure that those who contribute to the community can live in the community if they desire" and asked why that was stricken from the Plan. Ms. Krusell stated her children attended Edina schools but now cannot afford to live here. Ms. Krusell urged the Council to not accept the Comprehensive Plan. Patrick Downey, 7501 Hyde Park Drive, stated he was a 25 -year resident, had sons and -a career raising institutional capital for commercial developers. He followed the Comprehensive Plan cycle and was impressed with the professionalism and citizen input. However, he was shocked that the Council removed portions of the Housing Section. Mr. Downey referenced Chapter 5 -21, Item 3, and asked why the 500 -unit goal for affordable housing was reduced to 212 units, noting some units would have gone to seniors. He stated his son married an Edina girl but lives in St. Louis Park because they cannot afford a house in Edina. Mr. Downey stated Edina needed to be revitalized by attracting young families to maintain its tax base and schools. He suggested affordable housing would provide better opportunity to attract young families, nurses, teachers and firefighters. Mr. Downey asked why the recommendation had been struck encouraging multiple building types or the expansion of mixed -use development. Mr. Downey urged the Council not to pass the Comprehensive Plan as written and to review the document as drafted by the Planning Commission that incorporated a long -term vision for the City and housing recommendations. Rev. Gregory Welch, Church of St. Patrick, 6820 St. Patrick's Lane, stated he speaks to the question not of product or process but that the people who had come to the hearings and put together the Comprehensive Plan document were in an unresolved conundrum as to what was done. He pointed out it only takes two Council Members to see the document was not passed tonight. Rev. Welch stated the City Council and Mayor were credible people who listen and if they disagree, have an articulate way to do so; however, that negotiation takes time. He stated the deadline was the end of December but it could be extended for that type of reason. Rev. Welch commented that years ago, Edina was a "sandbox ", but development happened because of the creativity of community leaders. Now creativity was needed to provide housing for seniors and the people who work here, teaching in Edina's schools and serving on the police force. Rev. Welch urged the Council to take more time so there can be further dialogue. Stefan Helgeson, 3609 West 55th Street, stated. he was a 28 -year resident and echoed the comments already expressed tonight. He displayed Chapter 2, Vision and Objectives of the Draft Plan, and drew attention to the areas that had been removed. He concurred with the opinion that the public process had been truncated, which was unfortunate because many people cared about what happened in Edina. Mr. Helgeson stated the Council had in its hands the vision of Edina and could stretch to serve the future or Page 3 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /December 2. 2008 squander it by not hearing the participants in this process. He stated he was a participant and was very concerned about the process and precedence this set in Edina. Mr. Helgeson suggested that Edina was sitting on its laurels while surrounding communities were getting award - winning developments. He stressed the need to become a leader in developing Edina, a suburban first -ring community, through an urban process. He felt the Comprehensive Plan did not address those future opportunities to become leaders, noting LRT had passed Edina by and the Council had said "no" to bike trails that would have provided connection to other communities. Mr. Helgeson suggested the Comprehensive Plan was the vehicle to bring Edina into the next decade and he could not understand how the Comprehensive Plan ended in its current state. He recommended the Council not approve the Comprehensive Plan and look at it again. Dan Gieseke, 6800 Point Drive, stated he was a 17 -year resident and attracted to Edina by its leadership, innovation and being a premier suburb. He stated the Comprehensive Plan should be the "tool" spoken about by others that would set Edina apart. Mr. Gieseke stated he participated in the public meetings and was excited about the process to provide input but now thought that residents were being short changed with this draft of the Comprehensive Plan. He urged the Council to reconsider the prior information from public input and consulting groups. He noted there had been considerable expense, time and effort in this process and that many of the people who worked on the Update to the Plan did not feel right about the outcome. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, stated he had attended more meetings of the Comprehensive Plan than most citizens and did not like how it started or finished but thanked all who participated. He stated he had read the document three or four times and while he was not satisfied with the document, he understood reality. Mr. Persha stated he took strong exception to the sentence in Section 4 -1 indicating: "Land uses in Edina are the result of dynamic natural forces that shape the present landscape." He stated he had noticed that development went hand -in -hand with infrastructure, and there was a profound impact if infrastructure was lacking. He suggested some areas of the City would take Small Area Plans and stated his concern that Edina needed better citizen participation and citizens should be able to choose their own representatives instead of having them appointed by the Council. Mr. Persha referenced Section 5 -10, Neighborhood Character, and indicated that he liked to think Edina's neighborhoods had character, but it was incumbent on commercial and office uses to be incorporated into that character and complementary to the residential neighborhood. He suggested broadening the definition of rental property since residents in all parts of Edina had become concerned about rental of individual homes, which they believed were a defect in their neighborhood. Mr. Persha stated he was not sure whether licensing or a time limit was needed, but people who rented out homes had an obligation to keep up their y location.' felt that mixed -use was not the only answer to increased density, and green space was never a tradeoff for higher building height. He stated his concern that some of the pictures used for illustration in the Comprehensive Plan were not of Edina property. Bernadette Daly, 4521 Sedum Lane, stated she was a 26 -year resident with five children. Ms. Daly had followed with interest the public hearings and meetings at the Church of St. Patrick on housing and been impressed with the Council's engagement in seeking ways to help provide housing and economic diversity. She asked the Council to explain why, in Chapter 5, Page 19, Live Work Buildings and Mixed - Use Housing had been dropped. Ms. Daly suggested that other communities had wonderful examples of mixed -use buildings that were attractive, successful and visionary. She asked why Edina could not have the same and asked the Council to reconsider and put that type of housing back into the Comprehensive Plan. John Morial, 6566 France Avenue South, stated he moved from a smaller community when his children finished school and now lived at Point of France. Mr. Morial said Point of France had been built in 1976 and was state -of- the -art in design and worthy of Edina at that time. He stated he was now a senior citizen, had lived in Edina for 16 years and enjoyed having Lake Cornelia within two blocks, wooded areas, pathways, wonderful neighborhoods, as well as all the services, stores and shops, all within several blocks. Mr. Morial stated that Mayor Hovland's presentation at the Church of St. Patrick addressed the vision of the Comprehensive Plan and Southdale Plan. He had been impressed with the urban /suburban vision of bikeways, pathways and had looked forward to enjoying that combination. Mr. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2, 2008 Morial asked what had happened to the vision, because it appeared to have been removed from the original report on which many hours had been spent. He urged the Council to vote "no" on the Comprehensive Plan so the Council could put vision back into the Plan before its approval. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, stated he was a 12 -year resident and had lived the preceding 40 years in southeast Minneapolis, always aspiring to live in Edina but unable to afford it. Mr. Bohan indicated he felt overwhelmed by people saying there was no vision and Edina was not doing the right thing. He stated he had heard a radio broadcast that there were no problems in Edina with foreclosures so something must be going right. Mr. Bohan said that initially the Draft Comprehensive Plan was the vision of a consultant whose focus was urban development. He suggested that over the course of 2007, the document began to reflect community input. Mr. Bohan stated he attended meetings and found interesting and sometimes heated discussions where the public got a chance to express their views, which caused changes in the original draft. For this reason, he said he felt it was not fair to say the Plan did not reflect the input from the community. Mr. Bohan stated that during 2008 the Council held many work sessions during which conflicts were resolved and ambiguities eliminated. He thought the Comprehensive Plan was a good representation and applauded the Council for their work. Mr. Bohan distributed seven suggestions to the Council. Douglas Mayo, 6041 Kellogg Avenue S., stated he returned to Minnesota in 1976 and chose to move to Edina where he became engaged in community activities including Chair of the Housing Task Force. Mr. Mayo explained he moved to Edina because it was a premier community where you could make a home, educate and raise your family. However, in the last few years he had come to question Edina's preeminence, which may no longer exist. Mr. Mayo stated his career was in real estate development, and he had seen competing communities get superior developments, recreation, transportation facilities and schools to challenge Edina. He expressed concern that Edina was changing, and possibly not for the better. Mr. Mayo described areas of Edina that contained deteriorating housing, outdoor storage, vacant lease space, a decrepit shopping center and blighted neighborhoods. He stated the draft Comprehensive Plan prepared by the Planning Commission had strategies to deal with these conditions and a vision for Edina with exciting opportunities for redevelopment of designated areas through category and mixed -use, with a wide range of life cycle housing for people of all economic standings. Mr. Mayo asked why all the strategies were deleted. He suggested the Comprehensive Plan before Council would result in the status quo, discourage innovation, not attract young families, not provide a range of housing, sense of a future or positive direction. He stated that if you envisioned an Edina that strives, then the Council should revisit the Comprehensive Plan and consider the research, expertise, wisdom and input of the Planning Commission, Housing Task Force, residents and consultants. Joellen Deever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, stated that she had been listening to comments and believed that no one was going to agree on a single issue. She thanked all who participated and commented that it was good to see familiar faces tonight of those who had attended the many Comprehensive Plan meetings. She commented that she found it interesting that Lewis Park Area did not want a restaurant, coffee shop, filling station or tall building. She stated that like Father Welch, she also remembered when Edina was considered a "sand box." Ms. Deever stated it had been an experience, pleasure and there were many people to thank. Bob Aderhold, 3529 West, 54th Street, stated he was a 12 -year resident and served on the Affordable Housing Task Force that submitted its report to the Council two years ago. He stated that report had been accepted by the Council and was to form the philosophical basis of the Housing Chapter in the Comprehensive Plan. He stated he had been part of that process and worked with wonderful people representing a broad cross section of Edina. Mr. Aderhold stated he felt the report provided very modest goals for the City, and he was disappointed to see that very few of those goals made it into the final Comprehensive Plan. He encourage the Council to revisit the Plan, which many felt was less visionary than hoped, especially in regard to the Housing chapter. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 2, 2008 The Council discussion included: Reading of Page 46 of the Housing Succession Plan that included five strategies recommended by the Task Force.; Two of the strategies were incorporated in full and two, ,incorporated in part in the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Plan adopted the Metropolitan Council goal of 212 new units of affordable housing, encouraged mix use development throughout most of the City where infrastructure was available or could be funded, advocated use of land trusts and second. ,mortgages to facilitc'ite affordable home ownership, and recommended be3tter coordination and. marketing of existing programs. high number of aft—rd-ah-le housing UAitS, rived_, OR Most Af thp QtY . . ............ . ..... ............ .... .. .. ... ...... .. ........ ... . .. .. . ....... .. .... ... ...... . ........ . ... . ....... ... - . ....... .... .... - ...... .... ..... regfam It was noted that mandatory exclusionary zoning had been eliminated from the draft Comprehensive Plan. The Council agreed the Comprehensive Plan had included one of the most complete processes ever seen and reflected exactly what was said in all the public meetings. The Council considered that this draft of the Comprehensive Plan was released to the public eight days in advance of this public hearing and during Thanksgiving weekend, but that the previous draft containing many of the chanqes discussed this evening had been published at the end of October. Hew@"F, It was ---- ...... ... . .... the changes I - . ... ... . . . ... ........... .. ... ........... ...... ... . ... had .............. been published - .. ....... .. .. .......... -- -- ... . . ............ .. felt that continuing the public hearing would not be a good use of time because additional substantive changes would not occur. The Council discussed that it was elected to incorporate the community's vision into the Comprehensive Plan and had spent a lot of time attending meetings to ascertain that vision. The Council had found Edina's citizens embrace diversity; and. young families and citizens want people who work here to live here. That was the reason high density new development at Cahill Gardens was found not to be timely because the area was already a successful core of employment with growing and expanding light industrial companies. The Council agreed it wanted to protect residential neighborhoods; and. create thriving commercial nodes, but d6 did not want to jeopardize residential neighborhoods, so were -was; concerned about having too much rental housing. The Council had negotiated through vigorous debate'� a Comprehensive Plan that struck a balance and equilibrium, which at least four Members could support. It was felt that Edina would continue to be innovative and attract people to live and work. The Council discussed its appreciation for those who participated in the process and that it should have informed the Housing Task Force earlier in the process that a mandatory inclusionary zoning did not have support so it was not a surprise to them. It was noted that Chapter 2, Vision and Goals originally had incorporated Vision 20/20, the City's Vision Statement first adopted in 2000 and ,revised in 2003, with changes that had not been made by public process. In removing Vision 20/20/ from, Chapter 2, the Council committed to hold a public process soon to revisit and update it. , war, Ghang the 2020 den-u-ment Visioning Statement that WaS eFigiRally finaly;Ziald ;R 2000 and updated 2003. In -:;dd2t*ei;, th a G Ommime eis it the 2020 vis..i.o. I ..... n .. ... ....s. Gef--The Council reaffirmed that . . . ...... ......... ... I ...... .. ...... input from public listening sessions indicated a clear, strong and overwhelming majority of residents: did not expect the community would remain unchanged but the kind of place they moved to with a balance of residential neighborhoods and suburban environment, not an urban environment. The Live Work Buildings were struck from the Plan due to a Fire Code issue and Accessory ; Buil .. d ;. 9 g Dwell . i .1 n . g 11 Units; were removed because public input indicated they' would be destructive to the pattern of residential neighborhoods. The Council acknowledged that while each member had areas they'd like to "tweak," the Plan had been ........................ _......_ .........I..................__. worked on for two years, there had been a lot of negotiation and the Plan senfinued embodied the . ... .. ..... ... .. ..... .......... ....... ........ community values and input heard 6ornmost who wrote or, testified OtFgAgly. The Council acknowledged the disappointment and feelings of disenfranchisement ef- 'expressed by some residents. Mayor Hovland - . .. ................... .. .. ............. some ....... stated he believed the Plan did not reflect the majority opinion of this Council or his., i vision discussed at the Church of St. Patrick meeting but was a document fashioned to satisfy the reqpirements of the Metropolitan Council. He stated his concern that the elements of ddinsity, height and housing have fallen short of the mark and would not provide a framework for transportation and sustainable communities. Mayor Hovland stated that he knew Council Members Masica and Bennett attended many meetings and felt the Plan reflected the vision of many in the community but he felt it reflected the vision of those who chose to show up. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2. 2008 Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2008 -134, Approving the Submission of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update to the Metropolitan Council. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON LIQUOR FEE INCREASES FOR 2009 — ORDINANCE NO. 2008 -10 ADOPTED SETTING VARIOUS FEES FOR 2009 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. City Manager Hughes explained that increasing liquor fees required the holding of a public hearing and adoption of an ordinance. He advised of the suggested fee increases and that the cost covered the City's expense to enforce the ordinance, process the application, conduct quarterly checks on restaurants for underage service and enforcement issues that could occur. Unique to Edina was to offer a license fee credit of $500 after completion of one calendar year and $1,000 after completion of two calendar years of successful license checks. Mr. Hughes explained that Ordinance No. 2008 -10 also contained the other fees set by ordinance that were annually adjusted. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:41 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to testimony. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion to grant First Reading and waive Second Reading, adopting Ordinance No. 2008 -10 Amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees effective January 1, 2009. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Roll call: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *AWARD OF BID — ONE 2009 FORD CROWN VICTORIA SQUAD CAR Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Masica awarding the bid for one 2009 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor to the recommended low bidder, Elk River Ford Crown Victoria at $22,276.36. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -123 APPROVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced Resolution No. 2008 -123 accepting Various Donations. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -125 APPROVED AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE MET COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT TAX BASE REVITALIZATION GRANT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Masica to approve Resolution No. 2008 -125 Page 7 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3, 2009 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Planning Commissioners present were: Commissioners Brown, Fischer, Forrest, Grabiel, Risser, Scherer, Schroeder, and Staunton. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to review issues of mutual interest to the Planning Commission and City Council and for the Council to hold a discussion of a potential City Council organizational development retreat. Planning Commissioner Fischer handed out the following list of zoning ordinance priorities which Planning Director briefly reviewed (Note: Page numbers quoted in the list refer to the Draft Comprehensive Plan): Zoning Ordinance Priorities 1. Comprehensive Plan inconsistencies. a. Height Standards — PRD-4 Districts. Page 4 -56 of Comprehensive Plan (HDR area) limits height to 8- stories — Current code has no max. b. Height Standards — RMD & POD -2 Districts. Page 4 -56 of Comprehensive Plan (RMD area) limits height to 12- stories — Current Code has no max. C. Height Standards — PCD -3 District. Page 4 -56 of Comprehensive Plan (CAC area) limits height to 10 -12 stories — Current Code max. is 18 stories. d. Height Standards — PCD -3 District. Page 4 -56 of Comprehensive Plan (MXC area) limits height to 8- stories — Current Code has no max. e. Height Standards — MDD -6 District. Page 4 -56 of Comprehensive Plan (HDR & OR areas) limits height to 4 and 9 stories — Current Code has no max. f. Height Standards — POD -2 District. Page 4 -57 of Comprehensive Plan (O area) limits height to 8 stories — Current Code has no max. 2. PUD & CUP Ordinance /Development review process. Page 4 -59 of the Comprehensive Plan states that a Planned Unit Development zoning option be considered to incorporate design guidelines, including sustainable design etc... The CUP regulations could also be updated to incorporate these same standards. 3. Zoning Board review of variances associated with a "final development plan." Consideration of our variance review process, particularly when a variance is tied to another application. 4. Driveway width limitation /impervious surface max. Address the issue of excessively wide driveways for new home construction and establishing an impervious surface maximum to address drainage concerns /issues. (Page 4-44.) 5. Parking standards. Update the parking requirements. Reduce spaces required if appropriate, encourage shared parking and parking at the rear of buildings. (Page 4 -47.) 6. Urban forest protection. Consider amendments to the landscaping requirements, including a tree preservation ordinance, and tree replacement requirement. (Page 4 -59.) 7. Garage placement. Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /February 3, 2009 Consider an amendment to limit garage placement to prevent garages in front of the living space of a home. (Page 4 -45.) 8. Solar Ordinance. If recommended by the Energy and Environment Commission. (Page 12 -9.) 9. Massing study. Examination of the impacts of the recent Ordinance changes from 2008. (Page 4 -44 and City Council directed.) This would likely be an early 2010 project. The Council and Planning Commission discussed the priorities, and it was determined that the Planning Commission would work on drafting amendments to existing City Code to be reviewed within the next three to six months with the City Council. Mayor Hovland thanked the Planning Commission members for their work, and they left the meeting at 6:40 p.m. Manager Hughes noted the Council had held an organizational development retreat two years ago with positive results. Since there now was a new member on the Council he inquired about holding a similar retreat in the near future. Mr. Hughes listed firms that could potentially lead such a retreat. He noted this could be a good lead in to update the City's VISION 20/20. Council directed Mr. Hughes to select a consultant and bring back possible dates in March or early April. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk Minutes /Edina Citv Council /ADril 21. 2009 Proponent Presentation Arrie Larsen Manti, Edina Chamber of Commerce President, requested approval of their application and thanked the Council for its past support of this event. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to Approve Temporary On- Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Special Permit to use City property in conjunction with the Liquor License for the Taste of Edina event sponsored by the Edina Chamber of Commerce, conditioned that the sale and consumption be limited to beer and wine. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT Dan Wick, representing Congressman Erik Paulsen, offered Congressman Paulsen's assistance to both the City of Edina and its citizens. Mr. Wick advised how the Congressman could be contacted. Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, thanked staff for its assistance with the utility construction in the Country Club area and urged use of the adopted Heritage Preservation guidelines. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, questioned the process for the Planning Commission's Work Plan amending the zoning code and whether public testimony would be entertained. *AWARD OF BID — 2009 -2011 POLICE UNIFORM CONTRACT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for the 2009 -2011 Police Uniform Contract to the recommended low bidder, Uniforms Unlimited at $15,325.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. ORDINANCE AMEN-D1VIENT&- Planning ommission Chair Fischer and Assistant Chair Staunton presented the proposed work plan to bring Edina's zoning code into agreement with the updated Comprehensive Plan. Planning Director Teague reviewed the recommended amendments 'to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The Council, Commissioners and staff discussed necessary amendments, lighting requirement, signage requirements, Planned Unit Development districts, the work plan, the proposed public process to be followed with an additional monthly study session held by a Committee -of- the - Whole, Commission attendance requirements and the impact on the Commission with the extra work session. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -43 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -43 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 1. 2009 The Council discussed the funding and scope of traffic studies and asked questions of staff. Mr. Knutson addressed zoning district classifications and notification standards. Mr. Teague defined accessory and permitted uses, confirming that accessory uses do not require notice or review or approval by the Planning Commission or City Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2009 -11, amending the City code concerning regulation of drive - through facilities. The Council discussed the ordinance and proposed the following revisions: Subd. 14, F3, "Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. "; add F.7. "Drive - through windows shall be limited to one service bay. "; add G. to limit the audio system and menu board to assure it does not impact adjacent single - family residences in all zoning districts; Section 3, Subd. 7, "...A restaurant may have a drive - through facility subject to the requirements in Section 850.07, Subd. 14F." and staff to verify language contained in Section 850.16. Member Brindle and Member Housh accepted these friendly amendments to the motion. Member Bennett stated that while she supported the proposed use, she would not support the ordinance amendment making drive - through windows an accessory use in all PCD -1 districts. It was noted the revised ordinance would be considered for second reading on September 15, 2009. Ayes: Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — JEFF PLACE SUMP DRAIN INSTALLATION IMP. #STS -366 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett awarding the bid for Jeff Place sump drain improvements, Improvement No. STS 366, to the recommended low bidder, RPU, Inc. at $23,310.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -75 ADOPTED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -75 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PLAN UPDATE Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -76, approving and adopting comprehensive plan update. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET (9/15/09) — FOR PLANNING ITEMS Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett setting public hearing dates for September 15, 2009, as follows: 1. Amendment to overall development plan and final site plan for Little Szechuan Restaurant at 4820 -West 77th Street. 2. Final development plan with side yard setbacks and height variances at 8050 West 78th Street for Hellmuth & Johnson Law Office. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 3 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 6, 2009 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh was absent. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Public Works Director; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Steve Kirchman, Building Official; Sherry Engelmann, Sanitarian; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to continue the Council's review of the proposed 2010 Operating Budget. City Manager Hughes stated the budget review would continue with those departments not finished at the last meeting. He added that there had been a staff rearrangement to cover two retirements without hiring any new staff. Mr. Hughes explained that the Public Works Coordinator and a Public Works Administrative Assistant were retiring. To cover these positions, the existing Utility Superintendent had been promoted to Assistant Public Works Superintendent, an administrative staff member from the Building Department would be working at Public Works three days a week with staff members from the Finance and Administration Departments covering her absence from City Hall. This shifting of responsibility will allow coverage without any hiring. It was noted that all the union contracts were up for negotiation this year. Engineer Houle stated his intent to postpone as much as feasible any equipment purchases. He said when replacing vehicles the intention was to go with smaller versions still capable of the needed functionality. Mr. Hughes . noted the Planning Department's budget had been reduced in professional services reflecting the completion of the Comprehensive Plan and because the Historical Planning Consultant would no longer be attending meetings of the Heritage Preservation Board. He pointed out this also eliminated budget monies for small area plans, but that the 2010 proposed budget for Planning was more in line with what the department had traditionally budgeted before the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Hughes noted the Building Department would be juggling support staff since a member was shifting to Public Works three days a week. He noted that part-time inspectors had been laid off, but the City would be retaining its full time inspection staff. Mr. Hughes said that activity for single family residential was still quite strong, but that commercial activity was down 37% from the same time in 2008. Mr. Hughes reviewed the Health Department's proposed budget. He noted that Karen Zeleznak of Bloomington Public Health would attend the October 20, 2009, Regular Council meeting to review the grant just received. The Council briefly reviewed the Assessing and Administration Departments' budget. It was noted that the Energy and Environment Commission budget would be reduced by $25,000. The City's participation in Metro Cities was discussed as well as the benefit received for participation in the various organizations such as the League of Minnesota Cities. It was noted that the contingency Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /October 6 2009 budget had been increased over previous year and pointed out that there were no monies in contingencies to fund studies not included in the budget. The Council briefly discussed areas that might have some cost benefit if services were to be shared regionally. Concern was expressed over the sacrifice of service accessibility to residents if shared services were initiated. The Council and staff discussed the proposed 2010 budget. It was agreed to invite the Boards and Commissions to the October 20, 2009, work session at 5:00 p.m. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 20, 2009. James B. Hovland, Mayor 2. Minutes /Edina Citv Council /December 1, 2009 Mr. Hughes answered questions of the Council, indicating that 37% of Edina's homes would see a tax decrease, 57% would have an increase of less than 5 %, and the remaining homes would have a higher increase. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to testify. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council recognized that 70% of the budget was payroll and indicated its appreciation for staff's dedication, noting staff would be participating in the majority of reductions since there would be no cost of living increase to salary. It was noted the 2010 budget and levy would be considered for adoption by the Council at its December 15, 2009, meeting. AWARD OF BID — GREER MEMORIAL GARDEN DEVELOPMENT — EDINA ART CENTER Park and Recreation Director Keprios advised that just over $21,000 had been raised to develop a garden in honor and memory of Pat and Bill Greer. The Edina Art Center subcommittee believed it could raise additional funding but should that fall short, the contractor had indicated it would develop only what had been funded. Mr. Keprios stated the garden plan was available for review at the Art Center or City Hall. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, awarding the bid for Greer Memorial garden development, Edina Art Center, to the recommended low bidder, 4 Quarters Design & Build at $29,976.00 plus Watershed District and building permit fees. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — EDINA PROMENADE PHASE 3 — LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, ENG 10 -1. IMPS NO. A -240 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for Edina promenade phase 3, landscape improvements Contract No. ENG 10 -1, Improvement No. A -240, to the recommended low bidder, Hartman Companies, Inc. at $66,209.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — COMPRESSOR CONTROL PANEL REPLACEMENTS — BRAEMAR 'SOUTH ARENA Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for compressor control panel replacements, Braemar South Arena, to the recommended low bidder, Cool Air Mechanical, Inc. at $18,530.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC WORKS SITE PROCESS PRESENTED Mayor Hovland recognized the attendance of Planning Commission Chair Michael Fischer, Commissioner Michael Schroeder, and Vice Chair Kevin Staunton. He thanked them for their work on this project as well as their contribution to the Planning Commission. Mr. Fischer presented the Planning Commission's community -based planning process that would identify properties and create a Small Area Plan to address areas within the City that were likely to change. He acknowledged the valuable contribution of the Planning Commission and Mr. Schroeder who had over 20 years of experience in community -based design. The program's goals were to create an inexpensive process,.a concentrated timeframe, a true community -based process, and to use a team of experts from Edina. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 2009 Mr. Schroeder presented the focus of 11 reas of the community identified as 'potential areas of change' in t ompre =Plan. He noted the authority to initiate resides with the Council and there were statutory requirements for the composition of the Plan or process used to achieve the Plan. Mr. Schroeder referenced seven key points to frame a Small Area Plan and described how this short one -month study period would be approached and achieved through a twelve -step process. Mr. Schroeder described those who would be involved in the process including a Technical Advisory Group, Community Advisory Team, a Design Team, and the public would be directly involved. He displayed a schedule to accomplish the Small Area Plan, resulting in articulation of principles to guide further planning, development direction, patterns, and concepts. Mr. Schroeder answered questions of the Council regarding the appropriate length of time for the planning process that assured adequate public notification and input yet maintained energy and found points of consensus. Mr. Schroeder commented on the high importance of fully advertising the event so all in Edina knew the process was occurring and to encourage their engagement. Mr. Staunton addressed selection and composition of the Community Advisory Team and Core Team made up of six Commission and Board members who would select two business /property owners and six community representatives. The Council requested that each quadrant of the City select its own Community Advisory Team membership to avoid a perception of pre - selection and assure success. The Council discussed the process, noting it would not change the land use designation nor create a nonconforming use. Rather, it would offer a suggestion for evolution. The Council also discussed the need for varied venues to advertise the kick -off meeting to assure a high level of resident participation. Mr. Staunton indicated he would work with staff to schedule the kick -off meeting in February of 2010 so that a small Area Plan could be announced in the upcoming issue of About Town. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, supporting the general Small Area Plan process and allow public testimony and written comment for two weeks. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2009 -12 ADOPTED — AMENDING SECTION 850 TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS OVER 1.000 SQUARE FEET Mr. Hughes stated the changes requested by Council at its last meeting had been incorporated. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2009 -12, amending the City Code concerning regulation of accessory buildings in the R -1, single - dwelling unit district. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -98 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2009 -98, accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -99 ADOPTED — AUTHORIZING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERRALS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2009 -99, approving deferral of special assessments. Page 3 incorporated on the site; however, they acknowledged the project meets Code with regard to landscaping. SPEAKING FROM THE PUBLIC: �• n�Q Mr. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place. � V �\ ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION: Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to the plans presented and subject to review by the Transportation Commission. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. III. INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Comprehensive Plan Update — Dan Cornejo Mr. Cornejo addressed the Commission and informed them to the best of his knowledge this is the fourth time the City of Edina has prepared a Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Cornejo said a main objective is to open up and encourage resident participation during the process. Continuing, Mr. Cornejo stated it is the task of the Planning Commission to oversee the Comprehensive Plan updating process. Continuing, Mr. Cornejo told the Commission until the plan has been adopted there will be a number of opportunities for resident input including small group "listening sessions" and community -wide public meetings. Mr. Cornejo informed the Commission a community -wide Comp Plan meeting will be held on March 21, 2007, 6:30 -8:30 pm in the Community Center auditorium. The meeting on the 21St will focus on land use. Mr. Cornejo also informed the Commission on April 5th an inter - generational dialogue will be held at City Hall in the Council Chambers. Mr. Cornejo explained "land use" in the City pointing out the City is divided into character types to include "Garden" which is the traditional neighborhood developed along street car lines, "Post War" housing developments during the 1950's and 1960's, (this era of housing is particularly vulnerable to tear downs), "Contemporary", the typical large suburban lots, "Multi- family Enclaves" and "Industrial /Mixed Use" districts. Mr. Cornejo introduced Mr. Arijs Pakalns, URS to speak to land use and infrastructure. With the aid of graphics Mr. Pakalns spoke to circulation and infrastructure as they relate to land use. 4 A discussed ensued with Commissioners acknowledging the Comp Plan is being updated incorporating Edina's Vision 20/20; however, noting the Comprehensive Plan doesn't really speak to values. It's a broader statement of community goals and policies that direct the development and redevelopment of the City into the future. The Comp Plan addresses zoning and other land use issues, street and other infrastructure improvements, traffic, parks, trails and other amenities including community services. Chair Lonsbury thanked Mr. Cornejo and Mr. Pakalns for their update. Chair Lonsbury directed residents to refer to Edina's website for more information on the Comp Plan including future meeting dates and times. IV. REPORT FROM STAFF: Mr. Teague informed the Commission the City Council approved the request by the Edina Fire Department for a Final Development Plan to construct a new Fire and.Rescue station. The City Council also approved the recommended change in Code regarding time limits for reapplying for a variance. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM Submitted by 5 MINUTE SUMMARY Regular Meeting of the`Edina `Planning Commission Wednesday; November 28, 2007; 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair John Lonsbury, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, Michael Schroeder, Mike Fischer, Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiel, Arlene Forrest and Katie Sierks STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague, Wayne Houle and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF MINUTE SUMMARY: The minutes of the October 31, 2007, meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS: Chair Lonsbury told the Commission he would like to amend the Agenda and have the Bike Edina Task Force go first. Commissioners agreed. Presentation of the City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan PRESENTATION BY CONSULTANT AND BIKE EDINA TASK FORCE Mr. Antonio Rosell, Community Design Group, Alice Hulbert and Kirk Johnson of the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) were present. Mrs. Hulbert told the Commission the BETF is very pleased with the Plan and introduced Mr. Antonio Rosell to the Commission who will, showcase the Plan Mr. Rosell addressed the Commission and explained he will be presenting a power.point presentation on the Plan. Mr. Rosell highlighted the guiding principles of the plan as follows: • Connecting to local and regional destinations • Safe routes for all • Bicycling as a base for community health • Bicycling as a useful transportation option in Edina • Improving safety. Mr. Rosell said success for the plan will be measured by increases in the number of people who cycle in Edina. Continuing, Mr. Rosell presented the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan to the Commission. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commissioners expressed their agreement that Edina needs a Bicycle Transportation Plan element in the Comprehensive Plan and told the Task Force they are very enthusiastic about the Plan. A majority of the Commissioners indicated they like to bike throughout the City and commented there are some heavily trafficked areas in the City (W 70t" Street) where biking is difficult and unsafe, adding creating bike lanes would be of great benefit not only to bikers but to the community at large. Commissioners also expressed the importance of trying to tie the City to the already established bike trails throughout the greater Metropolitan area. Chair Lonsbury thanked the BETF for their presentation and their positive contribution to the City. COMMISSION ACTION: No action required. Z -07 -5 Preliminary Development Plan Review Wayzata Properties Pentagon Park area along 77t" Street West STAFF PRESENTATION: Mr. Teague told the Commission the applicants are again in attendance this evening to introduce their redevelopment proposal at the regularly scheduled public hearing before the Commission. Mr. Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing to tear down the buildings on the Pentagon Tower and Pentagon Quads site and build 634 senior housing units, an 80,000 square foot hotel, three office towers that would total 737,000 square feet, and two above ground parking structures. The Pentagon Tower and Quad sites contain 660,500 K III. OLD BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARING / UPDATE OF THE 2008 CITY OF EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Presentation from Chair Lonsbury: Chair Lonsbury addressed the Commission and explained at this time he will be doing a brief presentation and overview of the differences between this Plan and the previous 1998 Plan and highlighting key points. Chair Lonsbury stated it is important to understand that the Comprehensive Plan is a plan for the future; it's a framework plan, a broad plan, and a general plan that helps to shape the vision of Edina. Chair Lonsbury gave his presentation. Chair Lonsbury opened the hearing for public testimony. Public Comment: Virginia Borgeson, 6216 Ewing Avenue, expressed displeasure with "Monster Houses ", the City's notification process and Council actions. Doug Mayo, 5004 Kellogg Avenue, asked the Commission to increase the goals for affordable housing. Virgil Dismeyer, 7250 Lewis Ridge, expressed interest in the concept of "Cahill Gardens" adding he believes a compatible plan can be developed for this area with high -rises kept along the major freeways. Joseph Talghader, 7504 Hyde Park Drive, told the Commission there's a lot of "stories out there" about what could /would happen in the Cahill area and suggested that the City send out flyers when a change is proposed for a specific area. Sharon Ming, 1103 Coventry Place, told the Commission she's a proponent of affordable housing and believes action needs to be taken to ensure that the affordable housing goals laid out in the Housing Succession Plan are met and if possible exceeded. Robert Gubrud, 4421 Ellsworth Drive, told the Commission they should consider the impact of peak oil and suggested that the Council should create a peak oil task force. 3 A resident of 6566 France Avenue told the Commission the City needs to pay attention to maintaining and expanding affordable housing opportunities, adding Edina schools need young children. Edina should be a place where teachers, police, fire fighters, etc. are able to live. Donald Dietz, 6405 Rolf Avenue, expressed displeasure that the City hasn't done anything to stop the continued building trend of "Monster Houses ". Neighborhoods need to be protected, and Edina's affordable housing stock needs to be maintained. Kimberly Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood Lane, told the Commission Edina needs a Community Center where not only seniors, but children and teens can go to participate in activities. Ms. Montgomery suggested that the City consider redeveloping the public works site with a Community Center. Ms. Montgomery added in her opinion the current public works site would be underutilized if another office building were constructed there. Ms. Montgomery also suggested that tree preservation language be placed in the Comprehensive Plan. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, questioned where "bonus" height has been implemented, and how it works. Mr. Bohan referred to the small area plans mentioned in the Plan and questioned who would initiate those area plans. Pat Downey, 7501 Hyde Park Drive, asked to have his voice added in support of affordable housing, adding the goal of 212 housing units is too low, increase the goal. Cassandra McHoltick, Lewis Ridge neighborhood association said her concern is with the small area plans especially in the Cahill area. Ms. McHoltick said retaining what exists, even warehouse district areas instead of high density housing, could be better. Increase in density is an increase in traffic. Ms. McHoltick suggested if the Cahill area plan is ever implemented high -rises should be limited along Highways 100 and 494. Ms. McHoltick pointed out Edina is mostly residential. Concluding, Ms. McHoltick said she wants suburban setback requirements maintained and the Cahill area should remain a small retail neighborhood node. John Knutson, 5215 Benton Avenue, stated he supports affordable housing and suggested that some form of development fee similar to parkland dedication (used to build and maintain parks) be formulated to advance affordable housing in Edina. Mr. Knutson said there are many seniors in Edina who want to downsize and they need affordable housing options. Police Officers, teachers, nurses also need affordable housing options. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. 4 COMMISSION COMMENTSMUESTIONS Chair Lonsbury stated that at this time he would like the Commission to discuss and comment on any issues /topics they have or those raised by residents. A lengthy discussion ensued with the following issues raised: • Set realistic affordable housing goals. Recommend an increase in affordable housing units. • The Housing Succession Plan goal of 500 affordable housing units may be a number that could be added to the Comprehensive Plan as achievable, noting the Housing Succession Plan was received by the City, but not adopted. Historically, Edina has proven it is important to achieve its goals, and having a "mandatory" number may "get it done ". • Clarify density bonuses with the suggestion that "bonus" becomes "incentives ". • The Comprehensive Plan should articulate why "affordable housing" matters and list those reasons • Assign responsibility for implementation of affordable housing goals. • Acknowledge affordable housing is a controversial issue and residents may have mixed feelings on the issue. Recognize challenges. • Increase affordable housing opportunities for all people, single, families, and seniors. Also include options in the plan to achieve affordable housing (Land Trusts, East Edina Housing) by reaching out to the business community. • Define inclusionary zoning, lifecycle housing, overlay districts and /or zones • Clearly define what is meant by the term "Step Down ". • Clarify small area plans and district guidelines noting there isn't anything in the Plan that states an area will be redeveloped. The Comp Plan is a guide plan and these small commercial nodes are owned by private individuals. Redevelopment may never occur. • Clarify who can request initiation of small area plans (community, property owners, business groups, City staff, Planning Commission, Council, etc) • Further clarify FAR and how zoning bonuses (incentives) work. Somehow articulate in the Plan that for the majority of Edina density will not be increased. Things will remain as is. It's only in those identified areas of possible change where the density bonuses /incentives will be able to be used to increase density. • Consider developing a PUD District (Planned Unit Development), acknowledging this would mean a change to the Zoning Ordinance; however, it is something the Planning Commission needs to consider. • Place in the Plan provisions for urban forest protection. Create a tree ordinance. 5 • Clarify or have a definition for the term "Aging Population ". It's a phrase used throughout the Comp Plan and it needs to be defined. • Acknowledge continued support for an increase in bike and walking paths. • Comment on massing and note recent changes to code. Chair Lonsbury in summary listed the following as items also for consideration: • Review the City's notification process. • Consider developing a "community center" so there is a location for intergenerational activities. • Acknowledge that peak oil is a concern for not only Edina but the entire country noting the City has established an Energy and Environmental Commission that should tackle this issue and other environmental and energy issues. Chair Lonsbury directed staff to formulate these comments and definitions into the Plan and bring them back to the Commission for further review at the February 27, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: A -08 -1 Sprint Spectrum and Adath Cemetery 5605 France Avenue, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Sprint Spectrum would like to build a 70 -foot tall cellular antenna tower at the Adath Cemetery at 5606 France Avenue. Edina's existing ordinances do not allow cellular antennas or towers within cemeteries. The applicant is therefore, requesting an ordinance amendment to allow cell towers within cemeteries. Planner Teague asked the Commission to note the City's current ordinance allows cellular antenna towers within the R -1 zoning district on properties that are conditionally permitted uses, publicly owned, or golf courses. The Adath Cemetery is zoned R -1, however cemeteries are not regulated. Planner Teague explained in most cities, cemeteries are conditionally permitted uses within single - family districts. However, the Edina zoning ordinance does not mention cemeteries at all; therefore, the City's two Y16 \�CORa 48 MINUTE SUMMARY Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, February 27, 2008, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, Michael Schroeder, Mike Fischer, Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiel, Arlene Forrest, Katie Sierks and John Lonsbury STAFF PRESENT: Planner, Cary Teague, Assistant City Manager, Heather Worthington, City Engineer, Wayne Houle, Assistant City Engineer, Jackie Sullivan, and Planning Commission Secretary, Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the January 30, 2008, meeting were filed with corrections from Chair Lonsbury. II. OLD BUSINESS: Update of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan Commission Comment Chair Lonsbury used a PowerPoint presentation highlighting changes made to the Comprehensive Plan since their last meeting. Chair Lonsbury referred to a letter with attachments from Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group. The letter is in response to the Comprehensive Plan and was submitted as written public testimony. Chair Lonsbury noted the purpose of the letter is to request a modification to the Comprehensive Plan for property located within the greater Southdale area bordered by Highway 62, France Avenue, Valley View Road /Lake Cornelia and 66th Street. Commissioners briefly discussed the letter and suggested that the interested parties give oral testimony to the City Council when the Council conducts their public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan. A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging the changes to the Plan and pointing out the importance of small area plans. Commissioners also noted the Plan has responded to concerns of residents by reducing building height in the City, reiterating the importance of small area plans if /when redevelopment occurs. Commissioners also noted the importance of creating a Plan that meets Edina's future housing, transportation and environmental needs. Chair Lonsbury suggested that action on the Comprehensive Plan be done with two motions. The fist, Commission approval or denial of the plan and second a motion forwarding the Comprehensive Plan Update to the City Council with Commission recommendation. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved approval of the Update of the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan, including the amended Transportation element. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Grabiel moved to forward the Update of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan to the City Council with the Commissions unanimous recommendation of approval. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. III. NEW BUSINESS: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 850.14, Subd. 8 Staff Presentation: Planner Teague addressed the Commission and explained Wayzata Properties is proposing to redevelop the 43 acre Pentagon Park office site and rezone the site to MDD -6. Planner Teague explained that Zoning Ordinance 850.14 Subd. 8A. requires that the minimum tract area for an MDD -6 development district be 50 acres. At this time staff is recommending an ordinance amendment to decrease the minimum tract area for the MDD -6 district from 50 to 40 acres. Planner Teague concluded staff believes it is reasonable to amend the ordinance for the following three reasons: 1. The 50 acre minimum was established solely for the Centennial Lakes development which was 50 acres in size. As mentioned, the MDD -6 oil A PENTAGON REVIVAL, LLC 2424 KENNEDY STREET NE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413 612.371.0123 June 10, 2014 Mr. Cary Teague City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Via Email & US Mail cteague @edinamn.gov Re: Proposed City Comprehensive P1anAmendment Regarding Residential Density for Mixed Use Areas, Building Height, Floor Area Ratio and Land Use Our File No. 26650 -000 Dear Cary: Thank you for meeting with me last week to discuss the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding residential densities for mixed use districts in the City of Edina. I understand that the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan-Amendment is..in response to the Metropolitan Council's directive following the City's submittal of its Comprehensive Guide Amendment for the Lennar Corporation development on York Avenue. We understand that the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment is required to comply with the Met Council's directive that Floor Area Ratio (as currently employed by the City) does not appropriately define residential densities in the Mixed Use Districts. Following my meeting with you and our review of the proposed Resolution, we are in agreement with Staff that establishing new residential density ranges will better align the descriptions of residential densities within each mixed use district. We understand that the amendments will not impact the intent of the mixed use densities approved in existing mixed use districts and we support the Amendment as a tool to comply with Metropolitan Council requirements and the City's desire for residential growth. As a recent recipient of the Pentagon Park Preliminary PU.D and Development Plan approval, we certainly need our preliminary approved plan and final densities to comply with the. Met Council requirements: While _housing is not proposed . at this time, we all want to make sure that the Comprehensive Guide Plan is. in compliance with Metropolitan Council standards and that any residential development within the Pentagon Park redevelopment is allowed the appropriate densities. It is our understanding that the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments are consistent with the approvals recently granted for the Pentagon Park PUD and Preliminary Development Plan Approvals, and that the amendments will not limit the future development of our property. Ifyouu. have any questions or need further input, please let me know. Si.)cerelY:, PI: GO LC Scott M. Tankenoff President Hope Melton 4825 Valley View Road Edina, MN,55424 June 17, 2014 STATEMENT: PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding residential density for mixed use areas, building height floor area ratio and land use; Resolution No. 204 -68 Last week I received the following email message regarding the upcoming Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan. It was circulated widely in the Concord Neighborhood. "Consider going to this meeting regarding development of the Valley View/Wooddale strip mall. Some talk that the City is thinking of Section 8 housing. Pass the word!" Apart from the obvious implications of this message there is the broader issue of trust in government. This message indicates that there is a segment of Edina residents who are anxious about the future, who feel threatened by growth and change, and who mistrust government. I think Edina residents understand that increased density ranges will have an important impact on neighborhoods throughout the City. Because of its importance, I think the this public hearing on the amendment should have been more widely publicized. While I recognize and applaud the efforts the City is already making to improve communications and trust between government and residents, I suggest the following for your consideration: 1. Whenever possible, err on the side of more, rather than less, communication. You may have regarded this amendment to increase density ranges as the mere correction of a technical error within the Comprehensive Plan, but residents, in retrospect, might view it differently and wonder why it wasn't more widely publicized. 2. You have initiated and are supporting the creation of City- Recognized Neighborhood Associations. Nextdoor is an excellent neighborhood communications tool and those of us on the ground, so to speak, are encouraging people to sign up and use it. I encourage you to make greater use of it by announcing, for example, upcoming public hearings. 3. When announcing planning efforts or changes that will impact neighborhoods, please also briefly describe the target area, the intended impacts, and why you're doing it. 4. Finally, I think it is important to talk about the values behind proposed changes. People want to know what you stand for in proposing them. Core values of equity, diversity, and democracy are supported by most people across racial, ethnic, class, and cultural /religious lines. Speaking openly about these core values will promote understanding and cooperation as, together, we face the difficult challenges of growth and change. .7 6725 YOR.K AVENUE PYd .D,•J l Ii14G -• AR 11 1 V.Pe! V Y —"-p r•1 .Imp t . r:2 Y- i � I �36� o rl�'�— •. � OFF ♦ 7 � � � � y� � 5�fi' �: r 1 i °tom ay: _lk (• .%' rK1 '� #1._3 � ,'d �� h �e a.l '�• {.ti w-. Jan 4r k /- •y�4�i.. ,f,�..,. � �� � r.,+•4T„ � � ��,r I �J �fL r r��,t` j - _ _ _ �i _ �> i .� � :rte' t •#'�4�t.. p4 W',.r`�� � 'd`' f� f, 7 ' �� -�I �j7.�� 17 — �Ct�.,.Fr{ F�yr,�M .1L'yt'IrT 1 •�_� A ��.IS -�' —'�-'T yr i..- W 1L- -_�_ L A t:,T J r r I s.5 Via_ W�2EI.~ ��•` 71 ,3_?sa L.,� T1- � y:3 '�tl �.. �Iiv �. ...- -C a ,g6ti.,�� 4". .. - A �,.�.• R!'Q - a 1 j-�'L�s �l Sit 1� � rat P,�- �pp 1r' +H. 4 1a...f� 7^. �� -__ f• 51 •"�' •Z" jpl f.�p Ti 11 ;+ -1 IF I .11 1 y �„ '� ��� ''•$�. e•!'al.. =I{ a:Y _ 2 1' e:. - .�nrh'k. : `n- NN.'r53X .: �'::,�rR PROJECT T ADDo RESS: MAY 12 2014 6125 York Ave S UTY OF EMNA UNIT MIX & SQUARE FOOTAGES 6725 YPM Av. Ed)n.. MN 1el.re rnr.afanW ewla;n a.. svnrrn.w T6TAS6L ml>1 Arb -. - -50 LM:, hNReyM/amen s9A9s s, fw ,:.sn .,410 :3.m7 ,: � 133 3U 6Q1 LwAr lu. 1, 5 10 -1916 ] 6I•< 11611 j 1 4 .D Di�31�asP1b �: 56.HIIVU+n�L�iY+rab,'b.a ..v�mm.Irtia<� w st 13.rnI. -L n.r.ry,ne PROJECT TEAM Lennas MultifamiN Investors 1300 E. Woodfield Rd. Suite 304 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Ph: 647 -592 -3362 Contact: Peter Chmielewski AMMt•t FJness Swanson Graham Architects Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1060 Minneapolis MN 55415 Ph 612339 5508 Fa 612. 9 -5382 Contact. Aaron Roseth, Christine Behrend 91111; Sunde Engineering, PLLC 10830 Nesbn Ave. South Bloomington MN 55437 Ph: 952229 -8672 Contact: Mike Kehler 1BJJ9sict— Damon Farber Associates 401 2nd Ave N. Suite 410 Minneapols, MN 55401 Ph: 6123327572 Fz 612332 -0936 Contact Jesse Symyrtywicz ,SyDu; Sunde Land SurVoym9 LLC 9001 E. Bloomington Fury. Suite 116 Bloomington MN 55420 Ph' 952-881-2455 F. 952668 -9526 Contact: Lenny Cancan Structural Enalnoser: Meyer Sorgman Johnson 12 South Sixth Street, Suite 610 Minneapols, MN 55402 Ph: 612 -336 -0713 Contact: Ross Turner Mechenlral8 Sleep Engineering, Inc. Plumbina Enalnears: 5430 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55029 Ph 763-585-6742 FA 763 - 5858757 Contact: Kurt Smilh Elecbl®1 Ermlrleer: Sleep Engineering, Inc. 5430 Douglas Drive North Crystal, MN 55429 Ph: 7635658742 F.: 763-5658757 Contacl: Steve Youngs SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME Ri s S a n n ^ ENERAL INFORAATION TITLE SHEET cvL CI.O DEAIXrtpN ANO PLAN - CI I INAGIONCONTRDL GRADING AHD DMiNAGE PLAN - c1.2 c1 SEWER ANe wATELUION sroRMANDD PoLLUT oN —ENT ION PLAN C1.. NOTES AND DETAILS uwoscAPE u1.0 LµoscAVE RAN U1.1 DSLAPE 6OHEDULE AND DETAILS RcwTECTURAL ARCNRECMAL SITE RAN 2 ETE PHOTOGRPPHs PERSPECT VE VIEWS s PEf6PEOTIVE VIEWS EvrEmoR eLRLOINC AUrER1A2s RCHITECTURAL 1.0 IAe OVERALL BOOR PLAN LEVEL PI PAAR -) NORTH Roth RAN —UPI (PARR I U6 SOUTEI RODR PLAN LEVEL PI (PA IRI 1 . OVERALL ROOK RAN LEVEL I(STREET PUN - IEVFl NORTH ROOK N LEVEL I ISTP E 7LEVEL) - 1 lb SOIIM BOOR PLAN IEVEL i 15TREEr LEVEL) 11 AI.L OVERALLROORRAN LEVfl NORTH BOOR RAI3- LEVEL( 1m scum, 'R RAN LEVEL2 - 1. GOURTYARDRArLS 1a OVERALL ROOM RAN - LEVELS I6 1.]E NORTH BOOR MAN LEVEL SOUTH ROOR PUN IEVEL }s 18 1b OVERALL 80011 PIANLEVfl6 NORTH ROOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 146 sOLrr,100RPLAN -UVELE - ROOF RAN E%TER— ELEVATION x EKIERIOR UEV411ON5 E%TERI- ELEVATIONS - GCI EXTERIOR ELEVATONS COLOR - EFU LDING SEGTKINs RVEr SURVEY SURVEv 6725 YORK AVE. Eaina. LLN esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE. .. n .. r. REVISIONS ..o 3L506w L. ESC; ESG 6725 YORK AVE. TITLE SHEET T1 .1 Ko..Imbelw. Call bd—yea ft tp � � � SMIM O LINES AND DDDU CAMM0111ER ®—� TAO DELO�LISHEDD POWER OISIRMTON SYSTEM. m— REMAINING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FROM NORTH Elm. Q —CAT04 MM INLET PROTEC ION (AfF 9LT SACK OR CITY OF LDNIffAPOl.15 APPROVED EMAL)• SEE DETAIL- GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES: POWER POLES ARE PROPERTY OF COMGKST XCEL AND COMCAST WOW SNMLL ME COORDIWATED SO THAT ALL DEMO WORK OCCURS AT THE SAME TIME F; r A yIl C ,sk a<e r n e 3U V AA r ®111 I a-, d916RCIC110x `.... 5 1 7 E C L E A R I N G: 1. perform all cleanrrpp and grubbinq rerk in —,dean- with the proviebne R MNDDT Standard SpeeRcetlen Section 2101• end the addltional requirement. contained herein. 2. Clearing is defined as the complete nmovol and dlspo$W of all Part, of natural and artifidal ob)aatleneble material.. etnu.t , tees, shrL1. bah.. windfall, grove• cod, and other v getWon in the daelgnated ... that aRrt anew nnund escapt Rum.. Grubbing is defined a the mxavalion, rem—L and dl.paal R oil pantie- of mtuel and ariRlek0 ob)actlonob4o molerlale, struaturas, tnwA emube. tweh.. H,df,lis. and other v"*town that .rust be]" ground iraludirg stumps. 3. Clear one grub the co.tnetlon arm in ad— of the grading operolion. a. Guild- Arm: Cempbtey coma. 00 Rumps, roots 40 mm (1S incn.) in diameter m larger, burled lc s and all other objectionable material occurbp within the fwd of the nee bung and to hoe eMal defence of 4.5 m (15 Neel) beyond the bulMing ells. 5. Other Aaae Grub all Rumes. ream v0 mm (1.5 inch.) in ammeter - loner, buried loge, and all other objeclia -ble material eeaurbg within the grading limits to a depth of rat less than 1 m (3.28 feat) Delos the misting greand -face or .bgrotla .=oration. whkheeer W deeper. 6. SocNlll and compact all depreaions resulting from the clearing and grubbhy operation With - liable material in ardor to make the -fax canton to the original adjmanl -rfa e a the ground. ]. =the sae had been cleared and prior to any -tting or fang op Wm. sN1P all opal and argane soft from ma W be built upon, path. or when grad. are b b• ndlangstl more Nan 152 mm (8 inch.). Strip the -4ting topsoil to hates depths once-t—d. Prarenl inlermingfmg wit undsrlyinp - beoll. or other ob).di —bb. material. Remove heavy geslhe of grows from areas before stripping. Where tress an to be left id-ding. top topsail gripping o -"kz m dle — away from the lea in order be pne end damage to the made road systsm. 6. Stodgile mil to be re–ueM In an area dear of the new construction. Remora acev soil from the site. g. Construat stockpiles in der that r11 freely drain -face wader. Maintain sag stockpiles free from debris and tesh. Do not obstruct sib dminage. 0, net e¢•ad o stockpile depth of 8 feet. 10. Keep the soil stockpile dome In order to prevent dryFg and dmL \ PAVEll SITE CONCRETE. AND CURB AND GLITTER ABANDON AND REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR TREE PROTECTION DETAILS ^ z I "Ag, e�ca i cai "LVn�cr o. N ]0 0 30 so SCALE IN FEET xw�ia mar wsmwmnAl oexa a lm°m1En rMO �� alaaaa rye x O°xeym n'r coca a sn°�iow' - nxE erlsl elm was m .i� a em nnm v.a®an ."n'm1px .�neam rem made SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDMONAL NOTES AND DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. Edina. MN chess s.nsa graham -hi.. mOO erashfnglon avenue south cezmlis es.M 55415 a�61 2. 3 3n9.5 S 06 www2e '1 '1 sg1 1 nx.er ••weir wr an aawna..r �. .� a � •r rb.r wr dear. we..., Vw. w a..1 a•. ewr amr.e acwae ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINAL ISSUE oz /xon. REVISIONS No. Description Dale 213506 noacrswsu NM MK 6725 YORK AVE. DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C1.0 ;✓�i .I!�r. • fir: �1- `�•r.,rerer., :.r. ir•.r. n. ri'; r; •r; eri; •, �.. �yrt't'filfirt�� ;;re; 1r•• 11 %. •1i tj;} rrj rj� SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDMONAL NOTES AND DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. Edina. MN chess s.nsa graham -hi.. mOO erashfnglon avenue south cezmlis es.M 55415 a�61 2. 3 3n9.5 S 06 www2e '1 '1 sg1 1 nx.er ••weir wr an aawna..r �. .� a � •r rb.r wr dear. we..., Vw. w a..1 a•. ewr amr.e acwae ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINAL ISSUE oz /xon. REVISIONS No. Description Dale 213506 noacrswsu NM MK 6725 YORK AVE. DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C1.0 ® Kn CR11 bdyou — 10. No larst,ultlar, asmoinlon or co nmm" pose maIntumarm s@rlpmml shall be P—td .11d,h the city stseen the hours .: GDpm and 7:00am on . b:yl w during any hours W S1t1m1A Sundays solut and eta, and Weral hollda^ e,aept under permit. urr —M. 7A: RONRMM CONCRM UNIDEMMM SMRWE SYSTM 0 0 ro 11 B I WS i � MW WSW— 1 30 so SCALE IN FEET 0 0 ro 11 B I WS i � MW SEE SHEETS C1'3 3 AND C1.41 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS ST Ice 2 R S. CB Dp!• i2- J, w Ir � 8 AFWJM t ®r, - ------ BE. ItOgF L T 21--, %g - 'PROPOSED BUIILDIN q T WE 983.94 t Rr PVC 3r. &I AZ F.; 1. w W r. N aa= Jwrt I N F I L T R AT 1 ON A R E A I Prated the infiltration a— from —,,aclUon and dertumar- of -i.0.9 soils. 2. Schedule the .... t—tion so that excavation of this Infiltration Wstom to final grade after the can ddlbtin drain, hem, born wredmeted oral fully stobifted. E.I-,ate the ft,fift-b— . to ithin one fact of final g Dwain am stabilized. rod. 1 Delay final e—tio, of the basin floor until all disturbed areas tributary to the Utilize equipment Idiot has relatively Ighd bearing presourei. No realy sallPment is c1laimal on the infinmc— before or offer mnst—lion. 3. Pnavld, dual —ring infiftramster tesUM at the infHbollon site in order to to wrify infiltration rates used for the basin design. Perform a min mum of 3 tests at sa& infiltration its The torte shall las preform bottom .1m,ator of the inflitation I,asm and shall be preformed by , qualified geatichnimi prf,,,inci- 0, tt"bo'gin const,udion until .oil type and Infiltration rate —ifwati— has been made. 4. Coome filter ;:g ,7= shall W Wc free draining mineral product. =Cfidft crashed carbonate quarry =k. Ilmostors, mashed an. sawged Luminous mit.— 5. Plo,o all excavated materials dorms -am and o,my from the infiltration area during and after amoration. WSW— FT p Pip. Mill TWI am cm SEE SHEETS C1'3 3 AND C1.41 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS ST Ice 2 R S. CB Dp!• i2- J, w Ir � 8 AFWJM t ®r, - ------ BE. ItOgF L T 21--, %g - 'PROPOSED BUIILDIN q T WE 983.94 t Rr PVC 3r. &I AZ F.; 1. w W r. N aa= Jwrt I N F I L T R AT 1 ON A R E A I Prated the infiltration a— from —,,aclUon and dertumar- of -i.0.9 soils. 2. Schedule the .... t—tion so that excavation of this Infiltration Wstom to final grade after the can ddlbtin drain, hem, born wredmeted oral fully stobifted. E.I-,ate the ft,fift-b— . to ithin one fact of final g Dwain am stabilized. rod. 1 Delay final e—tio, of the basin floor until all disturbed areas tributary to the Utilize equipment Idiot has relatively Ighd bearing presourei. No realy sallPment is c1laimal on the infinmc— before or offer mnst—lion. 3. Pnavld, dual —ring infiftramster tesUM at the infHbollon site in order to to wrify infiltration rates used for the basin design. Perform a min mum of 3 tests at sa& infiltration its The torte shall las preform bottom .1m,ator of the inflitation I,asm and shall be preformed by , qualified geatichnimi prf,,,inci- 0, tt"bo'gin const,udion until .oil type and Infiltration rate —ifwati— has been made. 4. Coome filter ;:g ,7= shall W Wc free draining mineral product. =Cfidft crashed carbonate quarry =k. Ilmostors, mashed an. sawged Luminous mit.— 5. Plo,o all excavated materials dorms -am and o,my from the infiltration area during and after amoration. 6725 YORK AVE. EdinA MN dress averson graham archimm SOD —hisgron = south nsirri. III run 55115 p , 1 P2*. 3 3 9 . 5 10. E I I I . 3 3 1 1 ,,w.esg ilr� 11 h .c ! . dl— run .— I dW, I—W MIUR T�— ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINALISSLIE -2011- REVISIONS No Description Dam 213506 fwaji— N-M NM MK 6725 YORK AVE. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C1.1 p Pip. Mill 727 111111 IIi eel l! 113111 hg' 6725 YORK AVE. EdinA MN dress averson graham archimm SOD —hisgron = south nsirri. III run 55115 p , 1 P2*. 3 3 9 . 5 10. E I I I . 3 3 1 1 ,,w.esg ilr� 11 h .c ! . dl— run .— I dW, I—W MIUR T�— ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINALISSLIE -2011- REVISIONS No Description Dam 213506 fwaji— N-M NM MK 6725 YORK AVE. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C1.1 AA. C.BUbl— I-dig. �t e�rrioer No construction. demolition or e lal poem moinlenwo amdpmenl Nall De op—t d eIthh Ne city Dst— the hours of B:OSpm mid 7:00= on : —.k:., or =9 my houm on Saturdap, Sundeye and Note and federal hdidaye, .wept u der permit - 41 1 � r DIP TWO" AND NI C �§ ZE a a - y FIT .3T�_r1 , sas `� „. _. %' r�z� D W �. i F W ; m6�C Mott t \ � omn sY1Om. L1 3, i s R r moarz asm wo f sums. IRAW mo or tv "Kt e, }' . PROPOSED n mxr FFE 883.94 yv _ s ! I- • — Is' PC 4AISgR/ 50E11 Jy i _°[ —L �,lr J Mypptf �� , .... • - JmlWll m �..'' B _ � (lssES LLYSL 6RnOR Rs . ,. � % $V tiB a.� air ss - __ t '• SERYM ImisisDNi 17 PIC guffaw S8� 1707OWf MiF/el♦1 ' ` ,� MGlmlc fOSQCIOII OOIML7OI still W5 !Lm �` • - OLM a1s IV' � j Pao ta•r RIE _.uc>i wiry[. AND Lamm cans• Y,. � -< i— `ir'K ..c �I�l 1. IDi.,�•,l ` s:�/ �1 ... s d _ TAP lsa new s'' M• mNET.I NEW li % is gN M0T'0C1':t { =_,a l3YERL)m78•E of ' z, .� } ' . "�, m40 — mntm- .,,, .,.'t `- ..1..:sx ,... \� - la. ran wAiY 1af91il0N ¢, � o- c' r ^. '� a 001, L TOP W4 i N SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND ao o w so DETAILS SCALE IN FEET 6725 YORK AVE. Edina. NIN elness saem— graham architects mOO washing., moue south eapoil mmnesma 55415 11612.339.5508 f. 61 2e 339.5 382 . sgarc h.com i ne.er «mh ew 4n. a :ummr wr ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINAL ISSUE'. mr20114 REVISIONS No. Description Date 213506 .�rx,eur�A NM MK seam ry 6725 YORK AVE. SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES C1.2 E R OS 1 0 N PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. De- eN IoelEen IN arm rot m M e'etubee (nq .Nn fng•. -- sips .a Me. et) ex tee d- lopmenl tb before .ark bsgme 2 Ast no-ol of trm old ado e•g•m11en mwsrr po.Tb SWlsdb Nemt ue- k orderr m .pee Me •mallsd prediml a1s t l t .Y ONrn tier.. Impbmml ooPoorlvts exrebutiex plmina, .,ti 4ulfn wipe, Mrbnrml .kw 9^m', - tehe eansMslM preN-s Mat miweas 1 FekeNip nnnld 1 deb vase or r.d.boeme. -olebb Il.rmmkmt w brnnP -vary et- tiYOlen apoba b .In.. ed rum-g wW ex poses, et in krr 6.n 1. days m d Aebabod or pmood ms 1 ls8drq team- pond tedexmpa TNe Ihoi .- �.11kmA weds. Wkmg,IU eNr mimlctbr�0i PcW s won octNdY unnewmaP. fw • Bartle - slrawary t,= rem .errand topap emNmiln mtl ei alsex o1 tNeksted e®r.led IrMalel F arse b PI.km4 1 aexbn and mow rues -kg ft mob ibn Wind Prtl w pales IN epic. Wre seen ttlneut ors oww .: M M perMUed. Slabouse ts deMOd P -m•Pam =n elth . minimum of r tepol i-firt y otter final raaob .mpblmn. S.tl ad mlecn, a iced w x1l ems Ns onex .Teen a Nun .Ron cmnprMn t fmml Wixom wok (.eeUnm -NWg). 5. SmbNS all dbnobd arm r b Peed Wt, easy expTneMe d t,ael bee. e. Appy rn.say mtm-. to - mmtr . ms onto Ilad rob k orbr to P.nmt De Need or msl SOIL S T A 9I L I Z A T I ON 1 - .M mabdten •edoal or .added am• an °Mtlpnllumy do,--der bib m the .wrl a . sett, .wMq 0sdn.eet ry dno°1°addifteenal cost m U° OmnmPrwnapt1a°i°r.Ptau °ml sod tle°tt ddM Inn to IM Nekd b.h.m n I. prs d.d and d sed onto on . daped, d.pe..d.ed. nanny ntsd or .nn e.b te e odduad mt to the Omer. 2 F ass m M j exodie, m 1f�lamd seal nib-m sgdrtnd m 6N100r No. 250. Appy and mi.°m t - rm d 764 ry pr Mews ('M m Dm -m.) F ®rem .m MmOr Spkbe Syr_ 2571 Incorpam - Ty. ] fallen (do. raYS yin .M 10 assn I.ldd) ooladb9 of ZZ -5-10 (1DI -P-6) bale the a0 t an oweade. rob d 3°2 kt, la hstas (350 Its fa ern) t d .. enter to seem. 3. EsldrM diato see lee In a erne• .Hn Iboar smlndmd spec mn5 u. - Tree ty m Drill m •�• m o neat like" tkath N to (1/2 Inch to tox 25 i�Mn °(1�'x� dd- hnorr°m e tlIS mg•/nufry --of Me. sent the ail rand•s m ell and ment is pas. tier aN sop In pray r Ocr•s• ..., n In em re.. $-else end In a.ee ter N. ml arreo ry aop -sears farm one .mm0 /fle se be , a brmtlml. Girders .M nr •son rn m n.xp nN k-m /+fully seer s.P from IM sod /rem ices . Two an" my M vsmba morn repwde se Wet th' the - I-, - -, .p - Pwf the dM lello.ft lenw'vg F met b mil. a ton •••e -Md. ms b . Wnux .Ion i Ianerwt .M. amwlw reek vkoot A me m (Inds b ~ lanbcaex Plan W dsxgl as ahead. 5. F meal am .nn ekes egllol b w Immr Nan 4:1, Nay Mmpr Stondera See 3ee3 Tye 1 - u-M* aka the 1 enfem t nand a m- ahem 24 Nun balm seng in - lwraolkm tee MAUI Standard S pee. 25733. Appy minks t e lab d 49 mstrk erns pa Met,. (2 tam pr ooh). m -soil, abr omew•m, ashen a owe nasal I tie soil by edmpba (sbapt dbkFp) In a maelmn po- ndkder to that t N. -.. too .ate rem.. Pumx1 - oukn I- the .t,0 m e ben d x to 3 inns she a di setlnt, d S' m Ices. P a LL UT 1 G PREVENTION NA NA OE N E NT NE A S RE S: 1. DW- d eouwbd sdvnmt esithest art vane meager notion dirk. pope. Inexi r. Iamtruell and di Baden mfr, and tfa .exte peavey on -ter F eemtm -e. tell Mnrvota Pofl- Contrel AINnry Imlbsnenb. 2, tlo ... hon blesdil L Pma .Iw- 0l4 Q.WIm. pall all any hmneek- ab.mnexe s war b Prnwnt .ens btu w o11mn I sc , Igbtle oantmal R.trkt acme m m order m preeanl n.Itwmm. Spay and dfapwe a mtwmb Newt M u mmPlaNS d M+G moubtlaa 1 9thQems, , B: Do se d wlae Wimp rnmMbr. oIV -ages ban, t.IVg ..t.. ter. m@•r' °e .at... -r -lady .n-de and F mngnalm tee telvleem Poortmn Control Apmny depml l- anlmvnb. 4. Flnue abWx trbm bomb.. end neulPly Tow the male se dose font ee wmbsd 3. De - .m. se61 .exb. nwdne -N. art my mobrieb and to M eonba or mn-If bkr a nasldN men or two s.r .Stern. 6 Uml andmel .am a alas one ona oembwlkn - te a donned as of one sue. aexn wnlcYa tiny I-. mtl0md .M tea Nvt doter I.p m ofeporsd .terms tmPPne stow. WImF mneff all Pnp.dy d'vps t web. E'll. d•gnsin i. I.mmfted. 7. Cotes IN Oahe and told ..t. gsrel.e t extents .atnt opsrmbm b b I.k -pmol -an-. testy or bnperlrabm oar. Do not alb. eN know and .em wad. to exntet ur griued. Pmmnt -DR from the mere seslmel op•onaN a mica Dress t Da-m and ease serfs prep t, F cempli- tee Ml.sb PonNlan Canoe Apsay n di Imes - dan teas ad iic- m .ash .exlyd -s b - to rpm swam .adman mein to roue new - fxLba D. _a-.4- sere _wr 1- Fmem and IIItd dtaTed portable mvt Coexists a lea -wmblslbn alb. Ti p-rmW mom its M Lw.dsnIs mcabrd Mr tle s d d mdm an the mi tmmmF w temps in o eNml. my, tindery celdTbn kn aaame wale Mnllsom a.pwbn.n t "'Itit 1 r.tid -mesh FINAL ST A B I L 12 A T I O N: 1. Denpl.r dl INII dtenbkg aebiu. t 1M the one tealSWI of 1. Is a Ienlfernrk exlw4m e.1.nl vo °.�mwlt �wb: to I �O1Betio. Igoe: 1 Vriy Berl ee vrv.N .pmwmr b.brl.I eY•bnnn 'e rambled F o®enle .a uv dNo, all •exdTMba Nome- d .nosed tern vN Fe Its- 3. RamkN ts Mm= ismell.. stri ton- bkbaodmb .rubs and sen•Itl eentmI assts der eN .M hex ud-on. flee, mMlaolmn ices Pang.. e.11-oxlxfflilIW =WW= LF�m�Icall for lisps d Nr Imnwd b Too SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. -n,- Not- md-1 preens In mbr to Iwme. •.dnemnl mom aa•bq arras ..I- notdn avb and W- .f.EVrot ma .two dru. -. 2 Immll all empwmy a pa emend raownt canb.l .- Ind-, •m Isms on p-, d aaetrucll., rook eoMndkn -, s.dm.t nn.n, oln0 ell verb ad. b b'I" sod• dearn9. gradn, m o11nr kpnd- ..kno - iq'. 3. Eemebh ee0lmmt mnbe wadi> w 10 doe- aa6rll P elmit en Wm am w graded and mYulbin° .cIM11s IN in. Tls pants mW versus b plop Ipd ew mm = lee bs. smb on- 4. TM town, of u. 'vemodvn of ood d meb-I m¢y oey M mpebd F orbr M b Nat -W 1 n tlr der aradmt b•atm.t systy beenis e.rbabd, stets addTlennd w wltimt .card rarotl pretLa m mdwm. BIIP• in order to "teem w ermle�rq 6. vein weY meek. dha.kn .a°1s. or tnm Smile ommt mvdks In order to ma. Weel floe one prevent d• (err amp. I.,- 9xx- 1- 1. amt .Its a stem of 11 m •hire. 7. =W begs tb dement, and glaii pretsf d some s.sr Web IMt nmYre anon hem 6mmrMd F peer te pr.wnl wdrm. Ion •." - tons wn •y4Mn, srel d .beer sic nom Uete m not rnssbd b .b dWINm dump exebucopn. Preto d el term - infer by bul.oe ..al- t Fbt Pm- inlet ee two - Inlets m u•l' w oanplebd. Yelweb emir YsV bb pwbdbn In Pere u.a .0 mom 411n pmdte b omen m tlN mob m .-et.d S. Btor• b.ymem misblsY instal a TEMPORARY RICK CONSTRUCTION ENTBM1CIE W •son Pei -x rsnEls sod one mmms0°n m. Its 25 mm If bed) to b mm (2 inch) dbnebr nick NNDOr SlondPd Spwince l 3132 G-1. G -2. G -3. or Bawl Caarm Agt,rspub. Pke No oagreoab b o soya t Yet 152 mm (B �mtruetbnkmm�lh a IMRIDCTT StSti Umedd 5 eentesbn 33M T Vmmperlrm°mpAmON °IPOtm�dM lhbric(mlwrm� Into wopplexvb In Weer m Driest no- t .NI tto Vls lack Item beer.. Imlmin one .ntrunm In o =endtlen net tP Paint berMnp w fiery a mom.. who ow•a rem.aya name prlaak mp alvlm .b.bd men- . rsdsa Cb. mtratr rend prtse.a t tenparmy rNek oonebw[bn ovals. m on en.bncum berry: B. R rimy. amen tln..Mob of oonWVellex ankle It once te nom .Y b.nere tle kNnci. Mere tle mbeoon .lie tern whkl. my an an ma Nm8-tl .mI toe mm btm Into an appaw0 smmrd tropon deem. 70. Ramre d ads e-a soomem bated or eu..Ir depotbd eras djemd property. mwmmt ore, laments. mama. ant drys. Remowl and he on a dam, bones NraNnad tlo dool of ee ex"e dN' Clean pond loabry• t mp.ot, w .t- s•ospbg. De M ft amp. n necasry. cape pall Maces F aeor to kos I:ornpectsd .dlment rlmlmml peter m - itnti. Need seemed rnobrbl m a aMW. mpa•W ones. Seal -14 b oI- any afbr Innis- w Mm Imnnd ry m°nr -g w -n-S. 11. S.±I Ew _ Imlay .iw= m other .N ceno sdlment ondrox Mond d tompnray 1 • .W.. ldexb 1 or mn1 -xi- .uelk tlkvl the de.mmq. dnoe I.ngu Is no Ns amn B m (25 IM) frnn them d the pM to It ad- .V. Indudog tmmmr ern /w� am s ono end a- sMbne, or mMWb all ddcw n0o then is a byNea F al®M - mmn.abr. 1 eeFbg la ion Nil 7 d-yN .mbom the et-cki by m chorea. reonex- mrm, tali. w tier nmaa DWro em.N mp°b. cas mMlnsa°n ern . MwmskpD kc@•d dose Nan B m (i5 -0 to ° oaal.ry w trmNgs rMmY ton tmpL end w.t erwm Italics wn m role or .mk.d iNMm. 12. xxxi ss1 rm done CIS mwaX (m a I.wl howeeeet PMM) .lu w rm tones up W -Isom) F over b htp Next ..br bddld the fn- bdtel the .M lino M tlN who ddo t the •Irwext poser. Proms . next Name t 13 m (4 Ise) w Is. DrAS pmts t mot 0.e m (2 Mel) Nrr the aalro. Mow one alt erne. fool. in ° berth t text 152 mm (a new) dsso and 152 mm Is ixens) .tls ding m the .,I, skb of one -lied oexs. Lay the took in ue been and - bookst tier mmppaat .IM a ebotory Pke. mnNemr. Yale. ory .plis In w r t a Iwo post. M sob. owep the febrk a I= 152 mm (a Iew). fain R tier, old svusy fxxtan N m u. ranee New Sin fee slepexdng pexb tndn W 31 mm (2 nen) .eve or knp h-eed, pee, w boomer T- w U -stbn sal Nett T- or U -s.tien test pexb Note -0 not leer alms 19602 ke pr m.1v (135 M Pr Oral fool). Pexb ten law a mbdman Imglh t 1524 ern (5 I-.Q. Pexb t1ool IM libtdare W f= 1m�q fM took orb plsemt •wp°ee. GoMO. r tvd next the xsamsrlvb t Y1MOf 5�d SPSNFaoon ]BBB b Px.oe-vnblW a farm, nanw.e F e mdn.a. ren F dew r -'fi- IYOlmli r rvn M weber F t.b-a .d tippsmmne. and lam Ibrsr, fxno� m Iva Ti Ink too mom Mficst dba ietA (111) - IMOI- eM xod0x iI to Plvetle . -Imum ba-y.n .INIm Ors ou14Nere Fmk exp - M Ye1rltlollvl were. 13. Rdnpet tombs vdd lecithins F .Ia .Ion. cis- toes .em (edn . see-, mina all serf• F free t Nelvmb and ooknb.lm) by exedra ..m .nh •e. hole. to mom. or sM1 post men I.nnfwminrd un-1 pace Neal tux . ;Itnme. epee ion• M.. boss amPlebd. Pmts - De ndl I" Iva mall M 1010 mm (4 eeh) dom.br spoon peer, m - -1 bnex po•b ssignbg et mex the 059 kg (13 IM) lire eon root, .M a mwmum Wi d 710 mm (30 ben.) Pm Wnt d.pN. Spinet Pexb fw the xmdw-kg l.Inm te Frlrm of . m (la fsQ m Ion Dow p- fm nee mni fie at Imt 0.6 m (2 f.Q ilde w a- 14. fmrekvb o m.tYg m..n a moment muw d the or-, ewlb.dsr, the p.mr of the w.j.L eIt m. Ol7 •elf In wgMyto nick. Non .verbs eusel plop ad eN nexubmrmb OI ft M rdm m ay seer m Br m. tlN tt tt! ww.ex ak iexbd-d ono east xxxvux-a m. Ftd.d 0° M e-WI firedog .at wW 15. YeilmF dl ompxmy w.bn wt •a0m.nt vdrW Mkm in plop ndn m vbous, d°bm°' a. he bvk tadise (told- .unfNed elm pllsd anal r -- ar - In ar.nspexO). :epee lay rltlq. a-Oy farinnaUm. tie mlmub. Afbr feel slml1tl11nem1l t pomgm. tmnmrMn, metre oY bmnPwwy tMUe, ter - annals and nonem-gmaer..Imlen m .dew exomn awls end .y e¢Ianulette sin Dr•po. -tit one ter. 6tll II 1 J m. 'd' M v von. OR AS REM'D TD • r r�.a.warvesr.�.�mraaw 9*40 fOgO! WAMM AIM N AT E R I A L S: I the fdwng v app- betel •.erm t Nenbol dsvlexc u.. 6 Rod Dram Top Skins Yo of RD V (ft mllgh opoi tom 2'0' INet). Red anon Too Slob Muni RD 27 (ft rough .-Ig m- 2P I-). or Real Dreln Too sbb 1•odt as 3067 (fox - on"i no Tleb /Driw,75DMkes- 1° ift 55wn. � M b 21.211 RsgWw llos (b wv-/a N. A.aP .toile �m Ve1� N i g Roun d- an °m°C Hai.- Us ACIF FnNaa.doL bnc. 26.11 CoNeNI Rod, RknnexiL VA 2]251. Pllme (BW) 11e -]6M. w aoo- se W. c. InlreSuf. Sdmmt Control So- I.tsn valeNib wck m Ilw abide t m. bats, b soli b nap obi real rba Sbnbrd Irma. an okaMbb to M 24' to 30' N -bits mtl 2'4' oPNn,ii OAa0tes0 by R & FNIEI8MSF5 MEMO 5°613 Fall eoldomd. Sin Y. k0L DSOJB. Plum (651) 482 -2150. 4. skir Bag N-dI Log. Om r� n= e.11 b curb kuNot area Pam.d r F pia ak- veecpvm t R[D Beml fai 5115 county Rood 156. Sal. cloud. MR. u101. Plum (3120) ts3- 2 IOgex3 Taal use for IFbn Paden t - to M meal w Pw- W- t- O°1°epatrrMO. rMlallf=o e-Mb/MDOro lads e'1nn =erne. T-a-il mall M -nobly hnie of ab1. Ilmny day. won. -.4 .bra one owe djem arm 51 (2 beta) b desire me .lust Pk-r. roes. tekle, mN title rojxtlprrer mtrlt. 3. joi MloOT standard sp lFntim Sun Type 1 minks nNlmlt. 4. ��a����M��- MNDnr sbnded Sp!cobs 3737 Tym v Mn1r•ml• g• -1eNOS rrnbdal 3 yRxl MYBLLyLLyL'Y9 ygi 51 (2 bsn) auannisabm Imt,r U °.trod posh - gh lot kept nn 19602 kg r.r m.m (1.25 6 err M.I 1--U. Poe extoll Iren.. minimum length d 1324 mm (5 It). Past• tN0 haw Pmjecoom m ecotone fmWng Ns mint- are ww'mnt s -ppw.. neard 6. m Ise r m �°mNMUm mDF in eNV to wea llm OmtmlDe r m. bon udram b tw9-a m excise. on- or Tine r that allan - ppememm law dnN.w (1Ag rol' IWmp mN ab-oom. mepre.iee . w -yin suss Dh onddoer. iabrk eMr he0 M WmMbml wars. 7. 25 mm (1 nM) to W mm (2 Inn) dwder me- IINOm Smrldad Spedflexlbn 3137 CA -1. CA-2 w CA -3 Cans Ann"Ift . or owl. 8. Standard Spedacmlet 37M TM VV ommsew poMdk r NNpOT mm-nt W. TeM2 r Sad: INNOW Sbleae Stec 3ffn Ne. 23D. to. Esditted, sp It0 yex .Nn 10 .en Iwbm tanvmq of 22 -5-10 oeemdae .nn MxOOf smwaa sfmdn-d -n 3665. 12 51adm: S.P. usd to webs mid tlma.b melt bon U- ahnyel, 3 mm dbin.p Vol m non- .Owl .n.. Th.. .tin t 1M coo trl M a mIN- t 0 mm (1 I.h). Slopls •tits ton . 1•9th of 250 rem (10 Incw) or mw. from op to etepn arm bredrlg ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP QUANTITIES" ITEM QUANTITY Temporary Rxk Construction Entrance 1 Silt Seek Inlet Pmtectiott 15 Erosion Control Blanket 0 Stn- Riprop 0 Simone 1832 best .tdglma • BMP quantities am subject to change. Provide additional temporary Blii one necessary based on actual Site condition.. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE oPERAnON SCHEDULE D.00 a. brdlm i fee Nn) ONamYtlwk bywm IbpN aura env INSEA(IATON r YNI ado° wma �Peelsero.k� a W- In- aedr4 tst e• -eeY9 Neeemtl. b Pnedk. tons mm m tv s 1kld es edexbhs 3 awe t UN F�gv�idm�m.�rm6 reNa�l w� na k. ad}dw b erJV b .ke. -Hen tlIa m paalmtlan ar.1 X UN rer1 dameam avBrl4, b M mnWS. boles liner to ary Cvbe1 tle 1>D' and/s W Wen Ookt M q >wd d [M metes wlae 3 o-mles n. tsn.wa vad e ni ex-b best .tdglma e k.m Pon- . .N beep. 10 Bra. d akdabd mv. office ts N.m w at m.a.I. ,te.Ie 11 2 mb.� ono a. N.s.A Taxi Mm n. ay one /a 13 R.w on rleemy .d.. exlud rk.. IMdI Ivor to ary s.d saber d I.nmNaen b w Nres .eYn) time t ar .mem.dss IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (DISTURBED AREAS) PRE - CONSTRUCTION POST - CONSTRUCTION 134,951 •N- ft. 167,631 .q, ft. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE oPERAnON SCHEDULE ITEM INSEA(IATON 1NSPWn0N/M0JIN1IDWJCE REMOVAL SonIn- boles liner to ary know . minimum of oleo Ann a n„re.a m.ae M.. Contractor• aatatbn, gory 7 coy. or 2. MI. a/ta ° rem amt �y best .tdglma fax then 05 -nrJeNII M It z.-fmm prod. RMx- office Landscape Architect •.dFNnb . mu.".... Room, mgom. or office slapbn.d non- fueKBaed damn s6hin 24 boas of dace ay. SUNDE ENGINEERING, PUL. T--ry o- CorNWOUen IMdI Ivor to ary Impart dory. 1•elwonn m then alb eedlg apmvaee Fnbvm oomVlrtM, epIIM. Impart I.r isle of off-tlle ..dlmmt begin. trxan} Race• ary Ire lItl •�n1rlt ex a do* OmIL Storm Serer bd•I PrebcWn neon prbr Mom -eprt . -inan t ohm Afbr dbtue•d am Mw cmebedm w •area dry tlr nee meson wry 7 days m 24 Ian ell a bwn sltsObs6 Ilebll a ts n aesMt, one ooON ion oivcle in a 2. -hw- pride. xpe- t rnex- oxindmNbe. d. ik+ ary .may r�selns Want z. lam d dowry. Ternporvry ;m=ust Still Lill .Ilnln I4 Nerdar Impt ° mlNmum te tier N/A SMeWelbn deye of me miatil an dmorbonm p ts an.mY.d °Wry 7 days °r z4 hour. ofbr o rem erne came 1 -I.ex. tlnu 03-nalL - 2ry�priod�y any reds�l eemidmY.on�n Preb tern d Tmammy mmedMltly i darn. tmps4 ° d ono MW `De ton M.n Stoot.b able dl �On mfirnl mnwb. d brnan -Y .Wry 7 day m N heron aRn a reF sw. pr.It rma•e NI xi mall te.cllpmN _ u.n os-Md. In 0 isentmit ••albeemb meulrad. Mats ant, �ab Tone or Penmen- Inure ellNn 24 tour.. "N"" o mlNmun t ono N/A Er.oy oI.INeMn R Ter Otebb .rem 7 deye w 24 has arlm o reF .nil fern Ors -mrsr_ :4 -Imur peke. my Ie•ery teede 34 0 the Ma. d dreemr. Platselbn sues N/A Impart a u d em N/A o tcuo. (bnAdlg tnxx Vt maw exa exnrrymo •7 mm.) oli onmy 7 eye w , Wrhespllpa. eNr a rem .w-t M rhan D.5 -mew 24 -sour pnbd Asngw at, ado. mm a aomneon emm w rod in soli Rxnako and mean teUdn 7 dm. A dix r . SWPPP CONTACT INFORMATION AGENCY / POSITION CONTACT PERSON PHONE NUMBERS Other• office fax Contractor• gft.- fax Erosion Control Installer office Landscape Architect office fax SUNDE ENGINEERING, PUL. Brian Mundstock (952) 881 -3344 office 10830 Ne3DM Awnus South Bloomington. MN 55437 (952) 881 -1913 lax SWPPP Designer Party responsible for long term operation and maintenonee of Use permanent .1-iii management sy.t.m. Party responsible for overseeing the implementation of the SWPPP. INSPECTIONS AND M A I N I NA N OE REQUIREMENTS: I. Ionpai nee ties Iaanclbn Nb te Wte me 2 d- dwlrq oclM eomtrudan and .MF 2},.ppyp seer a oidon evert 9- Uan 0.3 irsns b a 24 -tour p.dod Fdotrg nn eat .7 l2u� mAtl mnext Fspstbn mud -n y mUl rWt t bs It 2. mop- of - pr..dbn art .dead anb-I S i at arbovl m.a 1 Noe ts illspltbm art mmesmnm mMrcOFe eumg mnmelbn F -tin, wt alp as rmlb .lire N. Si . TM brp.cnwe tiro malnOanolee n.eeb mW ke-ktls dm at ale d lnxptelkxo� dm and alnaPd of d relents web esW Non DS nears F a 24 -Mw pmmd, rem. of Persons(.) --a -carne n»bv. 1kndlp of Irmpdenm. rsemvnm0011pre for vroxiM eett- all any tomi ocUwe Into - 4. haP- d aod-n ale .Whet emtrd Soi m Draw to am.• Mspdy end dfinet- R.pm, I.plom. m appmn.It any Ia"un BMP• .a lu tpNl BYPS .NnF . Nun - d�mrary, w ex ern a MM ctin0- alb. -em inn- onoaNr MN frees ix epsdDSa s. Nxment °W M d sN� I� b o dspN of �U.n1n �Wd°NI -ea lied of the aasleo and sAnnot amt beer. P.P.. wpb.. a apm- blerloratd. .-Iind. rated �or masks mbd Oafs s 24 laws t tllswy. or ex - ex Rise exotek- 6. P--. -b.. or touppi es alt boo. sole <MI sine rlanrlvclbN er the edn.4 r Jr ,n of the Mplhl d Qa fad PNts lepers - M Ieb sods VI have d dowry. w m mI m IIW eedtpe ee. ewer. 7. CIVI term sear rids bexlm and err dalegs footles m rmdl.e m ado m lmmmF brew sn.a.rna Nmagl out M _nP.be .Men 72 noun, er .aeon as fWd eodlMm °sow 6 oeext •u"t- stns onekndFO mabNex -=-v=- .ys) .Mblo Ie .a-.e bpti... Ronson d adlm and eld tlDa oem s.dneN enael IoM in mead .L Rx-nIel and mbT ®e-n mW M mnNalb .Me 7 Goys d draimF urns lir.kme by eve. reWkeery. or N7 ts d ® w idud.t aneed art t mart Dm Pea .Whe obmmg mmFLL n Dm.ssi It bops- coma-Don she vsnkb sail brabonla or stare d ol1-de sdmrd troxi are peso vfea Rve. d .D• art s.dmslb bacbd m eUr.l. d - ants ed)aat prepeetY• per.nnad arm. •tl•.de. •1n.eb, art an"i b Re and anol on a YYnhL.00YM 0 -enola 0t dy sss• nawsP7 mlt petntId In�o Mom mmpatsd "an�°�°i"' m-bdel prefer m Q. Had ..ahnlad m-rdd b - .wise dIW -I also. Sb.l eexNe 1. elm.d oNy -ro. stmt w b.m I.nnon.d t •fa.Dlg a •..ping 10. Porten ay vnslM ms®-. °Neese by ft city IN M.-as (Lfi1 for WmMMbg and 24 hours tl nom l ft City t Nonmetals M 24 �f Iallllmtbn 6725 YORK AVE. Edina, MN doss seenson 9rdufn -hi- Soo rnhugton avenue south ninnepolm sou 55415 P. 612. 339. S S 09 www2 339. 5382 . e. sgarch.com I ton., ra-y m.n icon eaan.nl.e waved b m m -den err e.ae rvllydv. ad mar I a a eW bmW OIahBA vda m.I.e ttM sou d Nm.me skims Typal m renal Name u - ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINALISSUE mf7el1e REVISIONS No. Description Date 213506 oust too NM MK 6725 YORK AVE. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C1.3 GENERAL: I. C.ngb .M eW •PS Baby PnSDI_ .p®r! by t Orsyaknnl Salary and llaaM AdmbmNat<n (OSWO. ow" elOe 250 aplagbls nIm( Wpb, ant mdaa Pfsly ngWetMa 09s prNMlb •rrby 'rep 'tool.. •puma ben m Ir,ml,el. ant brrb (o a CFR 5-OOn 1910.118)..MmW e,mrmbFq um..p.� prxnv ant Pr.mdnlm ramblAtivl stab 's arNb a W,e ranea`ep...In r ma may rmporeMb roe ma ��., even-., -era .alvrlq a Wn apaarr- i -.-0ry. IpmOere, mpgrophk, ant ""I" Infmwbn onto w tnl• Plm r from . r"" ` by Sun". urrePn9. uc 3. Rev to 5-M amhMCbrnl pbn. for Wa.q wW amp .nasune. am kyut Pa drsnrk , pammm .stns na bmib. ft". sW a nM fSna- 4. Psfarm ao m -trmlbn .ton In wtnrSmp .M SIPm ant lanl ragWnmau. 5. A o-i.d .n.yr Na pn n rm metraabn .tv�. TM Ca tn' Nog PDk. ant - - preMln far Dr .mss` . wV4Nrtfbr� m I'm e- ding mn-abm Pica m mmmlabn�ItM emb 0r PmN a ala.nnn ale . lomtbrpN r~ to � r avewmk -stow. MA. ��mi 1 iD,DDDm-r � w nsr W_.' .nn are ant In- a a- to PUmt INlfm/�ar • p.nen a a Pactlwu In cadre In p..vlw motla9 X.ns m remain. 7. CmnM b -I.urq w9my ...r end emrm .rest Yx1 a aoradmq. Ir• .vlP 1p ..le ere.W m I- N entrain. _ Ile ..n w ddb 1Mt pr- e.br m 1M blab trml .0 Ck, .lmmN• ona •paaflmNPV far Dln q. ton._ Roobuet nMm agar IMO1b0P. U..amr •top gmlab In -dn' m I- ..mrO01,t ..b .rem DaeOm.g a St- -1 wIn o pipe. Tab nemuWm,. before baamq to a-Pa mvt • nrha mn,neaM• . tot M N. mNammlm Mee® m,emn )s. or Pqe bars IaIIIb. & I2dwg - AS P-ft ..m0e1M., hehNM .abr PIS nave I-rtow r - bead ma Wpm.a In wmdmlm •M ft narp*a a me mnnnnnnen PMmnq Fan, rys.mm Ibdm CMPIa 4715). Ceormmle �ba14rlqp ma bopK9P .M OW Stem I1.M Dn rtmmt ma W at/ PnbGC Worn Dnpn, n No dnni w pWMFq wY nay M mwad pbr.to N wu, tM realm.- Ivy ma bvp.abs. W Pa Mm tIPrA nsvwan n. fro n0 -nn in a®mmv n q tM Imubmrrlm a OSx a Uk Port 1920. S,APd P. 'Eamrv[1.1W N T,P ' 10. Cmndmb WnMg nnnb' mnnairn lom0ore a 5 M vrnl from Oe prepwd b.I.n..M q. •Xh lM Imwlw Plumbing Conbmmr W- b mn.bualm. Very .a.r ant over eeMm l.en0.., env. vW al -assn 4S, LM .- EnD_ PNw Is mrvbuetbn. 11. TM Inmllon. a --, WMr- .-.n m Inn In. v tram ramla .f.nnabn. TM Erplllew de tot peranta fna N easq ulaY..n ninon - R Men, aw . IM nvY l r rat m the lam. n r tM IbMrmm: n- _.t' b -onto. I- fbrd wrtsal ma - Axmlal 1®Ikn a a min, utlOUm (b _nD .acre 41st- -w Gn- wa a.wWVC -). -ft ba Eve a w.' -en- 12 DDnDD,I ,ft fanlmt GOPH Im one: F a (.1) ! WusPaM/SL Pend mete r 1- 000 - 252 -1In •b.lw bI WIr®m M •mct Iwdrm a arthq olds - a Ymt H ewkn. -w• (rml Ib eonvm and na0".) bans,, bep.Ny pry mr,Wtior, In ow.mao .M - Serb. 210. bsnk Obtvin scM reamer ark rI�1 +Iq reprorn, w a Ua wrlmv W0t1a a tM tlh PrP�ae - OPmr aq IM bArr�..M M PwEn usllb nna 1� an ha-W- I®� nrNe w etlr Irlmmnl va In - �14ra Imaione a priwvb Wmy f - beiWNq, but tot NrrMN m. a -n9rmM a•eme mbr.. Weplmrs. IV..,W kw .pdntln F- 13 WMe atlemq .m, •rcb4 .nest. « tarp -n• uMXe m,MCt .fq On Work naandnam ft - anaenlrom. raomrbt ama. la uPP. a n ed u aM ft W aIM ..I- fmMwmg ,nmr - gm M m 1dm-IS .stew Immmtkn alb d. mm Way mmywda 14. An fro elk dn mbU. dbPOl nry oR-.b. DhP a all Mao mn..mb. nn.brbl, dente. red N mebmr tot a.gmbe fro -Mann .bob rwafi M nest's h,d„as be...bnnP. pqa mw•b..nPea- ,mm�tm M1om tln nn,, w al nnonn w. 00b1n tlIe rte. b any .mm aw b. v�bMl Na mlaarM� MNdd m IM .st Mwabpol Ind mm apakable I. "d.Pm PerrreX r.9Walmna Oman on _q -ft m q men Is - OWNER. 15. W mawmr -1- Ica Ihr oars a-n -Iva manrfal mamMq m eM r.aun.m.e. err elo, sod. gn.. •inn. Oudib, ant ante rlmb .s1R.a Horan .r m .hem m tM Perm. Oo not r rayc,.a w aYa.•d app p cluM mlwaa. P scrap mrgl••. Un1es ansr.lm IeldcaPd, qe Ggmmr e-p lam dl I. Rumr. Il,a Inepc rlpMbf -.w a _;ninny __ w.Ilsa. Rep- .A mwae eurt ma 9160v. Sft N n pre I. Zwk m eelw dm, gW a IM mrsb ten amMb. Raman .-pd NI .w am atom t "ft nNPt�r -.Py. 7M .erF aro elvn In pavan ant Irvy rw0 IS M dj,- In en hid. 17. Prwke baffle co-I I. ®dery aOe ream mm.mr ale uv sWnne.an Yenml m Ilniferm TmWk GMre1 Omcma (sWUICD), i.bdq ms r.'a ur.w..I 1st.. T.ma.ma Trar _ - w. 4444 Jon . =I. I& Prwk. - ndaan t•mpolmy Sdrvgn mrmg -W mivtrletkn uM ar Psr- -d enin n, nnn-n Pm anemre an In prom P- PPn o nnL nano ulPOrml dmn.. aaM. ps1 nr most stream m nnn w In ~ m nmr. Pr..r -moos a a sera P Irvin b. pan, a Waring padn w ne...y..inn page .u9as IM Pubs .W Ped- Han dsnvy. a .rfo .av a.FUp d.Wg -1 Ih r M ma-0b In em,ml -v p- sm. veto Wr Mel m a mpnN in Wmp.- 1M. plo. PraeCt paalMrd atom Iran D'errmlq by deAnM trwb. mmblsffin FWM n. stl etllw wnkka. 21. Senn, -hy or qwy m rntn w 1Im1VY. o can ulvt prorke nabs m Ile bbdn. m Myst :9 eoe -oven w bs-, nv1'n-n Ier aal'v,m, cn n eaabq.. d.I-A m.aw wa udv dons In Rrd.lI poi 0. 211 n . Wn n in a dr-sso . cannon S M Pmrnq meae. 24. Irvlal all Pm am ma AMU Itlm1MlmOm numem m w top err h,- 1bn. Coma -e Pqn Imin9 a me k.-t Plm In as. pnpa.M rw Mw toy W pIm eM qn ban va w r.mNlq eta a w pipe panlbq open.. WI- canngsq m ..artlnp pip•. tM ar-g PP In W b anoL sy wl n, N n . In. _tDsIYn. elk prod• bav ,aYI^g arry PIP•. Dv na b1' Pb. In .obr ar .Iron uv tench mMlOmu on 'fast Ica •Pre .onto 25. Cam. ant PY Ica a .-Sn. ben. tn- -lyres. •Ir_ rnnn . a -.-anon tna Iar. }ui.dk..n caw w w.1.L Eenm a- lnnv t .wA n n®nn .M dl dam .ea .mm n.a., rule. ordnvm, w r.0 a P•rt•ey m S,. P_ "" a .orb - a. pardslnr, teen ur Gy eve .Prt In tM page rlaxbfy 27. t s_.'d SpcOlmtlem WOO 28011. 2111. - =1 �mben°°°iv.var Dente hem tor„ a 25. TM Ccnbmtor Nall . r -Prom. Ica tM amen, ant mgtrw -n a Wv PaPrvd raaaq .�. A tdNV.m lieww CMI Eno- tout dNPI ma bgn tie dmInt D ill �tlneaqIprr,,�� 5-M ammemr tlmn - ra..wer for a .mu.a eau .. rpecrMMmrMUmrq qua rPna'^'m q .r°a0 area mn.btl.n. a .MII imlm. tlr m•b a •ubmilling torn gam. b qe .. M min. TIlsml OR Tp-OU1 I/2' R GIAfM S DPE 3' R ODI omllw fi PAVF W GRADE ]' A \ 1/2' R i W 12' MImID01S 1m� _ CONCRETE CU. ': �7.1 m12 O. Nn, TO stA E 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER S I T E G R A D I N G 1. v lhs .nb B®nv tmlMOr .n,1 tM Na ma simiq ab m-airy nrAF.,. awml. aoa rvP-b. Eoae loml mClblu a me t mtl mee,. op .wly m In 5-M ennn- vW W elvaebr a 5-M eaM. ..mm mnSti- mk omw Ibrm ma may - remnmaa eoawtien � aD• «ere. eM arum .iw tM -ingn and oPJfi�bo aowrtq vsi v ma bane rmnnbr .0n tle a.kfl d nM 3. t'n; P.as a pan, -le-e .pa •MaGpe « mr,bin• an tlavmlmtl a unxwm tlope 9naa- N wq- opal aeratlare N.n m eure0nr en m -dprri a nob (gu .) unto a Inn ImmlM. ]. a be.-IW Non w ewA mnmeb m -'sling sort, n.k wdb nninDq Ww-- a nnf gl.. prior Is Into 1, IMeh eml.q gnaa- a mrebucll.n .mlb. 4. Rerew 00 - - (« mist. wmlNVp.a M. aearr. and -1 w mlNlanl abrtrclvs) In m. ivm from 1 m (355 Ito) -YS 1M fbVanni rR WDda to Dann- NRgrad• . t- pnapo0 pmen,oa orao, 5. C.rnp t buad01 . DO ulmb tr-en- to .SM SmM.m Preetar m®man dry dne4 (tSlr Dm9-78 w AA9110 1 -99) from ma pipe s- to .Man 1 15-25 M) born m. fnu-0 r..Snn. and 1006 SM-ed Pr.�r n,n -nn, dry deslb b Vs, Dm 1 m (]29 fat). Nr d«sib tar In emsM. a- 1st aomd to th �r � pawvmmbfmmm! tl I.� my mmpaclbn heN r naubed Ica -nary IN M a - nt .wuml 8. Cnm Iel pre M plamd In narrn•m aim in . ,snon aq MId10f SmMom Spmfsenbnn 3105 1 (Sp.CR.d O.raly Il.mea). Compton oll M pbe.d oast eWd� In asaraere eM on. reernerrmWOOOns a tM GaNahnlml EN-. 7. Cnmay .M Cr r.minms. a 0. &HA a CER. Pont 1925. SdPrt P. 'Emasauvle a- TmNs e. Cgebucl N Prmwa ekm.- .M tPSd- M •6e.dq 3:1 (3 -r®n- . I renlim), w,lo I,e1f� 0. Prwrde pmts+ d,'eamP nnnl' foam tnatlnp a a time 10. Tot a IM WDd, a- pawlmnt veto In tM Prom• a IM Gabe -pal Elp -. PMarm b pnp- area tan moire. Inca b ewb nM 9abr e.rebualm, pinny a gp'a b ®. cIa /i;= N t,nnI, bihwalvu aaOT d lane. w Mont mina nlWnhaa - m na ebm ma pecan -M1 onto Tat roll q. arm Moran 910 mm (12 bell -) naWn a Oa -ce a IM n-- m ~ m. a tM pnnnd er.m. Ua a teary Pnxomtk-GM noMr t-I by vaemr OMw r,Pdprn nth, ben .nob .pmea qt b- - 1.1100 mm (71 In Jm) n.d (ba -rr.b -Mar b toms)... .b. q . m 18-21 er IA (IS' a.) irdbbd b e pv.un a too FPO (04 P.). and a peen me- a en rats Pt Io Oan 13.5 rwdc ton. (14.9 to I) .- qI Imo Dan tat m.bk to- (15.1 tom). Tm ten one ae.Ia rymired cam . a mP- - Oevt -tore Prt a - an. mm- . wntat .M «n a ur .ry a let env. 11p_ tM tesy - a . •pea d tot M mm 4 -/n (v mph) ant reel Iwo ueP 9 Inn^ (5 mP). TM ItWPm.YaWnbq- eeroknM iwmbY O. a tM Ons qa fM err oust f �- ream ewfNDeam Inn -lento a q• r c E.n.e .1, awda dlybewn:nr aYCn' aPPO di.lq IM MI rtmng by �Ibbq, mM.9 w .awbq. ma n®nrywLnp m wW1.0 m opmb aNNb: « rq.-. nnb-, Iwo. -L �� � Rau f.nY a- �� Rvma mash vmI m 11. Pmwm ..n mnsOm premdo..na .-npmtan In o®mmere .M one nn0. _rl- 12. Cowenvb inspeclbn w.a�mtlCIn a ap eubpod- .loon er eWWq ant parernent ao .M - Galneh- -� n1r, tllst hnk.l Erq�.m0.�i onb ou ll�ln, roil m.tsW�at .Xnm tls buumnq pM famnNM nsonnrIn 13. CnnWUVt m gM'.q opwdliwu in a mm.,r Mal miNMV m. p-- for w .Ivan. 14. Grad. tlr. ab m ft f nW nrwG -. Non m 1M PM,. .Prot .n,bv,bn.nt nebrb4 nr r.mo...Itl -rpm a rem - Cm.riwl mnbrbl m n.auu.a v- rid..ar P.m w SaPm :la tw n® memNa i nr-1 w wRM W acwamd rr,ntaltl or bNq m,evW tlN In m amNr to - i -pwabE been Oro ones nwN.e P II. pmjR Omm,baUw, a rndnlnl In.- ma .Cost P-.M- In eWl Ve. rapwurmY a w OnnI w r avY tls iWl a malRla "oven ea e-wt In eeldslM IS es evmwA 15. In too etly MI In Pee•a P am. nmeps OPn 5:1. - ae.nmly IawJe tlr a.Pn In caeca m nwn® tlr bwea -bo tlr .bP .nd tM -P.... an- eelmerM1 111. St -turap nuppat al.rlar n,0.. aPP, er,d .nub. a •Pre nbs' 5-m. u,. n...n t en hv.t -d-tn bu -.tier Iaoring P -W a I- 5 stoat Mk. , -1 «too. -r* on eM fen InIson .oM m flee Imtlnin Mdardy a tlW .pry fn.n ml DElsr.g m tom do tot net. Nun of .f tMlr Imtb¢ Pbon iaWVlbn stq m .idea a We r Dnl fourae -n .eb m aeon- m Paenl oahemn9 a tM L tO tM rep.. Park. a rod 4 IPM a cab down Dacron Oen -Owen of was. •Imp. w orb ad Ne u,dalylrq l . cad- to ao. b d MR D.I .D rlbWO, .o &.oyn bdo tlr d- 17. I*=- I,n mmprled edpob was elan toed Pnrare.m a,o Nn0 - mrnpeetn& frw from nr.Pdar ream etvq-. a- fl --pang n: Hen Olen 19 Nan (0.05 eel O-- w b•s- ft .pealba .ape. •rwm. TM e.mprm vd9r.d.. 251- an.. anD - no_ncm4 M tran --Vino seam Cho q and I. fr� a mpeT a� O�nanw t.4 hnn nnrnn- If- ar I` w mod fry Pd�id mra.ngm. e-.P.- In.l) .no- w em. rev _,Si. R1:I.e P.dn .rMbn. W. C-.. mWPnnre vW ones preen._ Ost ne M -ropy tie edPads adb Rout m- mrc.pn pvllk anal from -.darn en vd aro d poem -b a- W . wave b mini- ea abWbanu M IM msbucllm nl* r-- lost q5- prep,r mnMalbn -o- in -In ..am dtludleq WPnn - Inn r r I9. H IS cram, In nbm.Wan Rat •rwvan Doom aeon m 991 « &11 on u- .e.mea to morn me.2 w 9&1.1 _'y. SANITARY SEWER: 1. qxw -boor .dmbd. s obese-. pnn m 4vmt. mvinrmeo ref- m•r•^ay m STY U1& henrMa .M Preset a ®. SmNwl ..ea maer.- 3 5 In .Nn ors -mmsd nrsb and tivSr ,,.pan, nl••ra torn lbne fro 250 Mad D,- 1. ton (15 s, In domlr w Ica. *v etiv.i. .dmbd Jo.b fro N pert maltmm,m II.r stbns asp Ica mM .. Mow b' -rirq %alsb rmom aq ASru Lq TM ,]via bontl dmMr Na,l mI - m man u bleReA 2. a- 11s add -.wan S In 40. -5111 MSS5 PeRaryl cheek. (PVC) Pb.- Pq. err al d.W-- PVC -q srWa. bob err a -nor,' veer Ndl -- WM IW- .'5-q .bmrren. gmbb. U. of wwM C.I'em11 )abN. In -bang w wwrD nor/ . Sob.nt mrnNl )any . m PP tot Im,u. Ica a . pdr- NQJ, r a .anbmUry most W lM Dip. sd cslvm nIjn k eeesrnmRa age FOnnnot. RuW. Prt 4715.01110..bpan nMn z r�-Mn . PPOaOr b•d mmD�PlbnW r� * .�M, AST 00]321.wr m ASTY 029111. ton oe PVC aP 1 fJ Nemo ebogl. P m IoMPY sty n-rN:- In ®Henn aq 1M.va. Rues pat 4715-1010. TM dlasv e.b-I rl-eb In 1vO.r11a Pp: .-o rat rm IN Iaet Ier PIPS 4 -Made end -v ..ba ClemtS am - Df n. ens nnnnw ems m tlI. pU- tiv sew. .ay.e oat a.n• .- meeeb neon eb a- eepmt- .send a meta b- hone w nand . IN-w R -1.11-& w vp -sea .ml) - a crPeum 4. lgoaW Pn®1na mar .P .deny m Me In mmrdPen .M lM sWI„wm R1deI Pa 4715MM. Tst 250 a - w d y W M nIssl moinni b-cminl 0 Si R w,ma nnnn "W In.w -Y I.Pin mra ntenntm 5. .-1 M •omrtlpM frpme /On.ro esffi P .n -ftq -rest m..mmno bent. U. dm- Nonw. Ye4drve -r inrre. /CNm.I S.r w EMtomab SStn,-.g Fnama/Ll -, Sqb G. .• Nneae Pouniy Ce. 61-1N2 c-tbg .M .W -sd"' nokl. bP S n0. - rRProwd nn . de on r, ..- ,q'vaa.v IPI•a core. aea leer tM -S y y soar' bML 7. unW a1w.w h,dmee4 r 4 & dereM (I Pr-nnt nlnbrM envoy .trmbu . N -I- rr nrmdvr< & hnmD .mil- Irm a- mry (Nnanh R- 1p14 -A w appr -.d -.0 e-r dl PVC ermeb. 0. Fenn -.lama. nrenng u- rmMq mOn dr tb abp.n al prc, PNanFYa. wa aMn wimndsUn Oa tern m "from a lb. of 157 loci -n M -dnR to )Pmrid. cvn.clb PPlpyunlm Mil. ntlkatl. ALq .emu eve Mks TMI. fie, T-t SmSrr w -Proved goal. rtn amore r a .acre .urfomu q sp- WDO.r 10. Mar. ps. lbeua, m-mry I.ot.- sk •.n.. WATER DI ST R I9 U T 1 0 N S Y S TEN 1 .� UI1WIet .w DID! Baer am . P®raaras .M, nsr.,om RWft Pot 1115-1110. -P. 2 storks a annimin Iermalml __ a 10 M etl.w a .dP ad w Mao b .me. ma w movYq•, Wn mtmm a - nnrr "l- bcamS .M. le fro a nn Pam a Dromq ,mm - d stmt 12 -:sn. awn eM Ica a rest ens. vm - r tot f-w. .5-M wP aP nYlarW ,lent maprnn IS 5-M npWrenn nb or lfhm.ae RWa Pad 471&170. -bW M W p.b w mu ibv an onto•- en IM nave Dr. alnN t11-M a tM vura6y 2. WM .. nnL,M }f.t a raw- DP nee ten a tM natty dIe m IM fini draae. Vnft ae.-n a emd nMn �. nonn, rest uuDWnn m __ fie. - b - = - In - m m ear a>m ]. )dip {Lqp: W.- a eemprtsa .awmam In mean - Ith AWIM ft . L If M. lads eF nnelln- 5-W manaN an I-a. d - vlrq alto saw VDt nn l a rent SD .m a aro0.bl. Mari . m neeerdww .,m .nr-ob R�In. port 47I5-2250. R•min ft beabd oats In 110 *a. fro a rm 21 -P.. laopre th. _. rmdal Sn rest WM a eM 24 -m p.Nea. IM f- Nbrt- n-Idml mmt M a rml 10 ..A nn mum a on, Pot . me Me. aoury -n a - eNwbe emvlb.USr a 1.9- IMwwb Nm1 - In ae -iemo .nn SmnamU neon... ASSA _Iz w owe mgeprbb ellvYV ba qs 4. Pr®r. ba nM P•rr.rrn bore &nl b.m m W .aP I.. rW.r ft eParriw, a ft Cib PdOC ■ors. m.L NeMy er cb a wa z1 .rkq neon.- Per m my mtn,4 Prrarrbn IM .aWMr m Io3. -we (n15 pr® Na (.m.®e� .nd a � tls paa v a b.etl eMalm) by moms a o pury nonlsma am nw u. plea M In e m�orM a prow- crap a 14 NPa (2 yW) or Ins S. U. ANSI /01111A 0151/A21.51 Thkb,.a CYV 52 or Prmrn Clm 2150 N- Non RP (DIP) n1q In— )aim for N .abmwn. U..rdl' tonne. tleN bar mW our m dl .a.rmP've JHIJ . rest-, - hydvrb. & PPyt*nnrn n c nrd In r.sand m .. noon. bon Pya 7. Unn mnel 'ed joint I-wint donee err fort r.bam m a .et.rn.m Inndn Ivdq . warted w -d7wdd dalmkn a 2Z -1/2 rrvrw - 1pgtn, a. ra.w vt d amr®IS. t- Croee. Ph1P, an home care- anS N hyrmlm In e`mtlmo am CRY rnPWwn -Ito U- SPI- 1100 b, E8M vP tor:. EmWM. I.- w rgpa -d Cod, bdvlYd m �o .IM n- IWPhew'. remnnrsnMbe 1w Imam m DIEOC ben P" e. At DO carer- kmtYS ..1, ragWn a 12' w amps when Irutal Pb calve- el,lch rn a ms tons ®bra r-0bd sba (CRS) lyPe Ica A.I.dmn Fa Coanr. Syr. 400 DueOb ban R-M-1 Wd9n Cob Vow. w spared nwe Gm caw. can mnlpm In ,caw C509. .- e-t Imo caw b® mmw,relry b ASfY A4e a .tore caw nswkn. Vow UNa -era pp .Rn }t /A' Wfla U- Tybr 0900 -0 .IV, W. R bo. or puwrnt Vow b-a -11 row m stmt 9• a ad)ubee•nt -ban area eao. flnrMO Rend.. Drop e...n P rare �. Nan - m- one Into ma .wa 9 -TPA' tot .n tlm top. Ur TYrr SSW0 Senypa aware .M vmWW Wrt, m qub.rlll. M F- lle Na - et the mm -don y. Go ql grunt hymM drsiln to ..mmy wen w -arm Cwwa -rot bmb hyd-m -In 1D fee or -- m.me w .bore -eve cam pd, -1s mk p.p hyd,mb .M aI0a aabp - b Pvsbq abs Is �� � p� �� 10. an w - w Mmm. In -Wby .m - w - steno In Pavan. - ant dtlnf.a.6 11. or, m ab uMRlw to 5' vu1•ke a pv Wllaq I. aq w amptbn a f .a- orb. E40aS nmr -care- iMo me eWkbq ma NWta, lstryp 1' above tln frin- Ila.r. I21vtd1 dWaesylaM1Vavgnwntl medang tap. dlrae0y Hare ml Pre. polytnylan. era a -r rene -nn, unrrrprau -_ Innon el Imbna bmUve . vtl.r b (rwUkn m)arrlrrl Pint err stmteq rmdw9raW rWLti -. WIns Wa MbamTd ila Tm Semluv. « apw.w rpe4 .xn blPCn naP a mN calm lemllm. STORY DRAINAGE: 1. Unlo ama.w Nae@rd. w , -berme -rte en snn to malmnme h.1- a.a mbabm,e neshn -.g In AS1N C47& Nrnln -d .RA veer atop nmbw NnI rem PS Pr-mt tv Joem M ae Prec.•I nn haln wNm• nndl -w celrRM, Meer b' -rirq It.-.b In ewar.wa .5-m A51r 0925. TM Ina. bane' no.- ail, w -Ito ann b 2 .cal evmnem. .mOnP �� M .Pw3R.E IW W.'aw. en-hoe- 1 MI Y+nrw vrk mmrcOwW In tlr .b- -w .y.-n -0 be 9-Wnt .r wtrtgn In o®mae .Ito 1.,.eote Rusts pent n7I&W00, A. -rl T-II naW« piny « mbntep pa- tot M o...mv m mom .math, mee\ISS to em mw one _ re.we nerve polo w IIa dto..a. A 5&J3116 Uo oak onn, Sdr-]e. AStsl D9W Pdyr 0 Oebk. (M) Pita b rI -9eamd NC awrn caw nn nFa 4 m 1 3mar In dmr-v. O. oM -eve.. SDR -9s. -51st FR POPImd Chbrk. (InX) PIP I« da4wJ.d PVC aerm nave nr.k- is W 27-.4- In dmmbr. bob fro N .tome caw aemI Ron P z p6N .lq aslmN.k pmbW. In- a - esmnt I-. r db•aD I« tnasnG nnh Sorvd rarPm )nob In PVC aP 1nt bY11M• Ina a . Itrsly .Rkn r a n-dmthq tutor m d. PP .- -oven . -®rave am IAmwen Row. Pmt 4715.0910. ed.rt 2 MW am .Nato unto per -lap - nano- .Ito PVC .]mad mnlormlq In ASIM D2564. -y W M pqe P . mm:aras g-nlw b! 're.Wreon m-I rangy .Xh A57N 02321. S. SM RaMarmd mnw.te PP (RCP) .rd ftn9n •nal mmnm m Aso US. D-qn C. eM amuv Iardwclq br m. elenn a aP.. -reed U. CI® N RCP fro N- 21• and Ip , u. CIO v RCP I« pip- Nan . 4am a RrJOmden 4- R -4. aq __ ra-r 'V -dreg I- n ®Wamo .M ASIA C]el. e. BC _MM M uvme . re.IPma n.rcnb npan P w f1. atl of W dvyna.d RLV mm caw plpm Tst IIn tot v.en .dyne (hebLvq aprwr) a N dayDa.d RCP .ban cam .MI a mbnm of ma Ir eN fatmema per pot 1Nn rwlbarvd vpPl- to eNe upm.om m .e.,tumm aPa Inlet a,a adlat Fs mwab elASm. W N I.- Tw b - I-U my In feu tM PP rnetaau bgWw. not for Fumy Dv oabm Uad. Nub .led .ml.. o tot r•almw m reel. a M - (27 ne) w Ica dam.br W.. - .a I, bare rmb P � mnr•b .Pa-. 7. JISISIQ I- .. pnnn a storm oar set an ban. 10 b.l a .1Uan 10 feel -sera Do lot a .nmr nose, w gel pea Onaso eeD .r - IdadtInd m mmamualee In aewdmv .M me Mr,nnom Rol- opt 47 5.2&20. Tea a fleast .brm .e- Drm for .fwOm nlbr Oe sty Dm Ies bw Inemn.d ant to J M pave In pho Ica at Inol 30 dD W pIM nnnd .®d o a.0.c-n a M N tM ten b.. mob n.r®y r.W. and mend. & Omlatft In ne -ns.. nM S1nlom RWS Prt 47152020. o Pd.rvW P yAnP N'wkn Pro (ASINI 9]034) « 3]]J TYi• 1 9avr.lD. R (ems F405) �amMlr }Hens b e-nae n rimers.. n.m0 rbmntlr .I. WWT It. U... Noah R -173] lrew .M lF on V ,eekl Y••••, w apwD..at• m ® /2. 1 4. & 4 9. ark 10. 125 Us N-en R -3047 -1311/0. emgp .M ub b n, w Mn nnnd L m W 98 .ea 7. 11. 11. N.aeh F.Mry Co. R -I947 net, .5-m --rq. -K bP R St. w .Pwew- -4 m a Germ saw manbnvnm hale Cssn .-0 beer tore Storm Sod IoM Iz 1-1 dnnc ,In and rnl nse" bpn dotty .era al Pc, paythonn..ra DWV ronum -Ptlw uMapama WtD4n d a dapq a 157 mm (15 bane) cram flnl.ntl gm., unr. omr.W Indml.a. Bring 1M mP D, de. .udam d .- bmOVV In - m Meade mnnq PnnIn fro swPlbq U=.- u1Mt1 -. Ire 1 -n ft- TrN FI- Tent SbeoA w .ppn nns at, .NR tomb top. a atoll alao 13. PIP Snob . bvlaaa In .szrtlse .Ito Wv vnumawd. rornn-amlva 1,n PIP Nell M W IMP a tllenmreetBal pyre P ft uP-- ...M, IM Y.,aUldml bPn d ft W. St Peed ft ..rtsod mkWort a ma ape. Lek .any a _,,n- gvlwsmd rem w tl-I PIP .ha tot . Pvm- HOPE RE 0 I R E N E N T S: meal IIWWR 9111E -O91 10.0. EId -.al cream .end«. mnupNIW hIgh -dtn•ly p.ryelnyls• I-) PP a bcvllery .dmM m ms Pen. mdmnets. e tM m m ,g illdllmmPrm v-. b m a rl gMeb9a 1 1D INEu2 ga]Ih1eO2i-B 9d i nlWost y . pnbmy rs (IDPE) 9to-• nalN m aP - -Ind, m gao-m neeq b.wnww aro p. P® n1+ 1m PIP Nog .Mon, IS e y- P nD_irN em m. AS IDII1sp tot mmpy .M ,tSTf Smndvd 0]212. Wd.r -Hem HIM. moon en use LW N HDPE Pp. m o nn . Panuhn, b•a. .aaoalbn tot mm* .M ASIA 02121. NI .ptrn• a 9n -InIna NDPE PPe N.D M r.mrd In eMr b poi. .aea SIM pma Perform .OgDP, tae on a HO PP alw tle oor Men AT• -- mama era bsmS Ito bo In PDm fro a lam 9) day. Mo pP. cap •era a daraP a m n 011 WI ben. n,PW nnm-my repN. etl pertwm tM w -sere u00 ..wmnY. Sully eS manes fro aal.nsl b.geG n ft aNS1bn tot 's to M M .b.. wlid bop w rrvnba4 R e-D M1ew P Cvmfr qW b 955 a - in.i. dbw- a rev Pon. yM boD w rear- Nan . awn _v.a .M d_ dtm�. rrerlwm a,e tom .Mae I -1-dml PWMy -.wee. 6725 YORK AVE. Edina. MN esc dnesl mans- graham archire. 500 Washington amnm worh esaa 55415 p.b 1 21.3 3.9.5 508 www211 379.h'c on, sgarc 11.44 rr-A. am stn ee<, -tore-. w r.r I sm. aw rmw wcaM uar..lswa W faaaY.« -s sq -can Ur- ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 ORIGINALISM: waai,4 REVISIONS No. Description Daze 213506 I.pycT N -eA NM MK amain - 6725 YORK AVE. NOTES AND DETAILS C 1.4 COLOR CONIC. NODE (30) STELLA WORO DAYLILLY COLOR CONC. NODE SOD (96) HAPPY ULLV RETURNS DAY ` \\ (6) FRONTIER ELM Y O } SOD O CONCRETE SIDEWALK SOD - (27) STELLA D'ORO DAYLILLY J� COLOR CONC. J NODE PLAN LEGEND ® PERENNIAL ® DECIDUOUS SHRUB CONFOOUS SHRUB 0I)_-000STREE - 1LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN I% -0 ;I (4) IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST -0 - II I - u _ II II p ONEYS H _ II ONEYSU CIQE (27) STELLA D•ORO DAYLILLY �— II BIKE J RACKS J PLANTERS I IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST (1B) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE — (12) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD (14) STELLA OORO DAYLILLY PLANTERS WITH ANNUALS — (2) AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE (16) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD EXISTING TREES TO REMAW (TYP) a e (14) STELLA D'ORO DAYLILLY (40) BLONDE AMBITION BLUE DRAMA — (24) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD (1) RED SUNSET MAPLE (2) REED SUNSET MAPLE I-' e o y 0 O JUNIPER I I 1 I � EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP) e O + + I� 7C• (18) BUSH --- - -- --t 1 HONEYSUCKLE Nip. IMPERIAL PLANTERS WITH ANNUALS I% -0 ;I (4) IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST -0 - II I - u _ II II p ONEYS H _ II ONEYSU CIQE (27) STELLA D•ORO DAYLILLY �— II BIKE J RACKS J PLANTERS I IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST (1B) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE — (12) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD (14) STELLA OORO DAYLILLY PLANTERS WITH ANNUALS — (2) AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE (16) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD EXISTING TREES TO REMAW (TYP) j e � \ e 66 I (19) SUMMER WINE (14)ANTHONY (14) HEAVY METAL NINEBARK WATERER SPIREA SWITCHGRASS (5) TECHNY ARBORVITAE (3) ARMSTRONG MAPLE (55) HEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASS AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE (12) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD (e) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD a e (4) SCOTCH PINE s 0 e ' I-' e o y 0 O JUNIPER I I 1 I � EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP) e O + + I� 7C• j --- - -- --t 1 (2S) TECHNY ARBORVITAE Nip. (28 ALPINE (37) ENGELMANN IVY (8) AUTUMN �� �um�yau o e : e e e (40) BLONDE AMBITION BLUE DRAMA (115) ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD e•� _ e o e RED SUNSET MAPLE CRUSHED STONE O +� CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEATING NODE OPEN GREEN SPACE �O O (1) SCOTCH PINE oa �OC.0 0 00 �0j O Zc�i00dfD O�OOOYOd 00 �dL 000007y.'af a 04 O 00j�:O�L °Oi�� l��!+� •� OgTO� ..:off. �y��Q,g�o�'�f�jll Wrr irl�A °e °dooZo�oora° °a�° °`a, �I i� OHO RETURNS DAYLI too (1) SCOTCH PINE AS (26) FOAMFLOW (4) WHITESPIRE BIRCH (95) ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Ol {O .6.00 6940 °�: •,•��i •.!srylti00ie1O�i009°e0�7[�i�+� �)e1� �00�,@IOOi01= e� 600d;� NODE (14) SILVER FEATHER MISCANTHUS e o O (8) MINT JULEP JUNIPER o (81) LITTLE LIWE HYDRAN GEA (10) WHrrESPIRE BIRCH (11) CABERNET IIII�'��llll BARBERRY — e •• e I o •• e j e � \ e 66 I (19) SUMMER WINE (14)ANTHONY (14) HEAVY METAL NINEBARK WATERER SPIREA SWITCHGRASS (5) TECHNY ARBORVITAE (3) ARMSTRONG MAPLE (55) HEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASS AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE (12) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD (e) FIREDANCE DOGWOOD 1...1 a e s 0 e ' I-' e o y 0 O JUNIPER I I 1 I � le e O iu�liii j --- - -- --t 1 a Inu a�i i (8) AUTUMN �um�yau o e : e e e i =; _ e o e � O 1...1 T 6725 YORK AVE. Edl-, MN elm, m.en gram -him. 500 — hingwn uenue s 0 n,—Ih e..55115 p.612.339 5 5 08 1. 11 1.339.5312 . sgarc h. cam sk- I r�nW urMr u� rN. 4mm.m �n mr v.ls. mrne sou m smk.ou T t )AMONFARBERASSOCIATES 403 2nd Alm w Nor. Su1m 410 NIImR 06, MN 55401 9612.3327522 1612.33UW6 www.totnONm0m.r4m ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORICINALIT.SUE oa is- REVISIONS No. Descdpdon Date 213506 J5 JS accem m 6725 YORK AVE. LANDSCAPE PLAN LAl .0 ' 1 O JUNIPER I I 1 e O .• : --- - -- --t 1 (8) AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 0 � O 00 °O R, _ q0 �OC.0 0 00 �0j O Zc�i00dfD O�OOOYOd 00 �dL 000007y.'af a 04 O 00j�:O�L °Oi�� l��!+� •� OgTO� ..:off. �y��Q,g�o�'�f�jll irl�A °e °dooZo�oora° °a�° °`a, �I COLOR CONC. NODE (19) BODACIOUS (1) SCOTCH PINE (26) FOAMFLOW (4) WHITESPIRE BIRCH (95) ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD T 6725 YORK AVE. Edl-, MN elm, m.en gram -him. 500 — hingwn uenue s 0 n,—Ih e..55115 p.612.339 5 5 08 1. 11 1.339.5312 . sgarc h. cam sk- I r�nW urMr u� rN. 4mm.m �n mr v.ls. mrne sou m smk.ou T t )AMONFARBERASSOCIATES 403 2nd Alm w Nor. Su1m 410 NIImR 06, MN 55401 9612.3327522 1612.33UW6 www.totnONm0m.r4m ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORICINALIT.SUE oa is- REVISIONS No. Descdpdon Date 213506 J5 JS accem m 6725 YORK AVE. LANDSCAPE PLAN LAl .0 GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITEAND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK- 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS. CURBVCVrrERS. TRAILS, TREES. LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS (MINIMUM 1D CLEARANCE} 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. - B. EXISTING CONTOURS. TRAILS, VEGETATION. CURBIGUTTER AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME 9. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES IN ALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLAIT ESTABLISHMENT. SURVNAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAIRENANCE OF NEWLY WALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. REPAIR OF ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 12. EXISTING TREES OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSNGS FOUND ON SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED OR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONS REGARDING EXISTING PUNT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL 13. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, UPON DIRECTION OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD. DAMAGED AND RUBBING BRANCHES. 14, CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PAY REQUEST. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS WON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. 16. SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCHEDULES IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECo-TCAMNS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NOTES GRADING NOTES 1. GRADING LIMITS ARE DEFINED AS THE JUNCTURE OF PROPOSED GRADE WITH EXISTING GRACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2 GRAONO LIMITS AND LIMITS OF WORK SHOWN ON PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED N FIELD BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WORK OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS WILL BE DONE AT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING 3. FILLWCUT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 1% MINIMUM GRADE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. MAINTAIN A UNIFORM GRADE BETWEEN CONTOURS N AREAS TO BE GRADED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE S. ELEVATIONS, IF SHOWN ARE FINISHED ELEVATIONS. SPOT ELEVATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CONTOURS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGRCIIND WIRES. CABLES. CONDUITS. PIPES, MANHOLES. VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE IF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT EROSION IS KEPT TO AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM -SEE CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS. a. PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVERING FOR CATCH BASINS AND MAN HOLES UNTIL FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETE -SEE CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS. PLANTING NOTES NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING MID CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. ANSI 260.1. STREET AND BOULEVARO TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN T ABOVE PAVED SURFACE. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STMNG OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO DIGGING. NO PUNT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO -WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER I AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1. TURF NOTES 1, SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2 WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SODISEED SHALL BE HELD 1• BELLOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB. ETC. 3. SOD STALL BE WD PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. ' 1^ - .�',' -�-k- PLANTING PR TO BE THREE NOTE TIMES THE DIM. OF ROOT BALL. CONTRACTOR SHALL MIAINTAIN TREES M A / - SLOPED - -- SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT PLUMB 3• COMPACTED ORGANICS EERIOD. WRAP TREE RU NXS ONLY UPON MULCH. TO BE PLACED 60 DAYS APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AFTER TREE PLANTING UPON SEE SPEC. SECTION RELATED CUTTING OF S' DIA SOD RING. \ TO EXT. PLANTING MULCH TO RE LEVEL WI i/. WAVE ROOTS NAND LOOSENED FINISHED GRADE DO NOT PLANT TREES WI ROOT FLARE VISIBLE AT TOP PUCE MULCH IN CONTACT OF ROOTBAU. IF ROOT FINE IS NOT VISIBLE, WISH TREE TRUNK REMOVE SOIL IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM ROOT NOTE BALL UNTIL FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT QQ DA . SEE SPECIFICA ION SECTION OR URGER) EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING So MAIN ORDER ROOT 1' HIGHER THAN ADJ. 7 MULCH. DO NOT RACE MULCH GRADE DO NOT COVER TOP EDGE CONDITION OF ROOT BALL WITH SOL VARIES. SEE PLAN MIL SEE RAN COMPACT PLANTING SOIL 1086- PERCENT OF MAIL DRY UNIT WT S DA. MULCH RING WITH TOOLED ]PR �VERT. EDGE TO BE CUT TO 7 BELOW ACCORDING TO ASTM D 598 I FINISHED GRADE ONCE SOD HAS BEEN IN PUCE FOR 60 DAYS. ' 1^ - .�',' -�-k- PLANTING PR TO BE THREE NOTE TIMES THE DIM. OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE "I✓.., // / - SLOPED - -- SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT ROPE AND WERE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL / / WITH SPADE BY HAND TO DH PREPARED SOIL BW'NR UNDHNRBED SUBGRADEJ I' TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE DIG PLANTING PR V TO 6 FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL RACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED r�� THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIT AS REQUIRED PER SPEC. OR COMPACTED SOIL GRAIN STACK AUGER A C DIA. HOLE 8 FILL Wl3M• i/. WAVE ROOTS NAND LOOSENED CHRAVEL COVER WI FILTER FABRIC. 1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL NlNnealm6s. MN 55401 SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF - PREPARE SOIL FOR NOTE THE ENTIRE BED SEE SPECIFICA ION SECTION CONDITON VARIES -SEE PUN RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING l. fSaLE 1A•.ra 7 MULCH. DO NOT RACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM 7T WEED EARLIER FABRIC MIL SEE RAN EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PLAN EDGING, SEE PLAN CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS TUMID LOOSENED PLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBS a 3 MIN.4' DEEPER THAN RCOT BALL SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL 2 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE PLANTING DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. Edina. MN =esc 500 - himlun avenue south mnn sods mm ma 55x15 p.'6e1 2.3 39. i "08 , , - 2a 3 3 9.- 3 8 2 sga rch.<om FOR CONDITION 3 STEEL EDGER PREPARE SOIL FOR NOTE I n..w a.In aa: •v. aeam<rv.0 w sv� s am a aw. itemm mm. -- mNVra .near u. N.s at me s_"_ vs sa,,env S Ow�i tfa SFE SPECIFICATION SECTION ETTL.EO ORGANIC MULCH DAMONFARSERASSOCIATES 7 I�� (SEE SPECIIGTIONSI (SE 6' G REFER IN CONTACT WITH PUNT STEM METAL EDGER W1 STAKE, PER „� EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PUN EDGING, SEE PLAN ' SPEC. 401 2b Avenue Nosh, Sum 410 i/. WAVE ROOTS NAND LOOSENED _ PUNTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALS NlNnealm6s. MN 55401 SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF - FINISHED GRADE AND EDGE 9612.3327522 tG12.332.0936 TO NO WITH PLANTING SOIL CONDITON VARIES -SEE PUN w XwPotdaloeT.wm FOR CONDITION 3 STEEL EDGER PREPARE SOIL FOR NOTE THE ENTIRE RED SFE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING 7 I�� 7 MULCH. DO NOT PUCE MULCH 6' G REFER IN CONTACT WITH PUNT STEM MN. TO PUN - ... „� EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PUN EDGING, SEE PLAN ' •/ _ CONTARU GROWN INTERNE SHALL / m i/. WAVE ROOTS NAND LOOSENED .= ,•NAT` 'r -.� u�w ;uu PUNTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALS .. , SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF - ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO NO WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRAI)E 4 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL l. fSaLE 1A•.ra .. - .. - .. TOTAL I SYM I QTY. COMMON NAME I SCIENTIFIC NAME I SIZE I CONT. I COMMENTS EVERGREEN TREES 6 1 SCOICHPINE I Pinus sylvesbU _��IdilLxQ :12A %.CI:UI :PIIC1��L111T^.:f rSiTdl71F:% n� t:Y:rs]TTaIIIIW�L=9i91*1:1401JFT3� � <T)•lllla IUtl :R dICR IIUIPd �lIRDi':,'DTT.TITITS[Aal �T ^]- ibY:[ei�F?ta.7F�if -9d_Ta �Uy :1 d F:1 a� PLANTING SCHEDULE ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE 03 13 4 REVISIONS No. Description Date 213506 wog- m oa )5 IS -to ry 6725 YORK AVE- LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE KS DETAILS LAI.I Mrs - e I 1 uu• _•7T�t • sc- ?±: »I:R #71:11 .I� I��:isT� � .. . s a F n .= ,•NAT` 'r -.� u�w ;uu �� .. , yl, , 1 - , s . ����a��3d,�iai,T�1� � *����♦re�sn�r=;a �OrT.lu� : 1iT�i�lii: �t d4. 1t�11��1 •E�I:C� #y17_'T.[� ►��37�:>• EVERGREEN TREES 6 1 SCOICHPINE I Pinus sylvesbU _��IdilLxQ :12A %.CI:UI :PIIC1��L111T^.:f rSiTdl71F:% n� t:Y:rs]TTaIIIIW�L=9i91*1:1401JFT3� � <T)•lllla IUtl :R dICR IIUIPd �lIRDi':,'DTT.TITITS[Aal �T ^]- ibY:[ei�F?ta.7F�if -9d_Ta �Uy :1 d F:1 a� PLANTING SCHEDULE ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE 03 13 4 REVISIONS No. Description Date 213506 wog- m oa )5 IS -to ry 6725 YORK AVE- LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE KS DETAILS LAI.I DECOMTVE SCREEN —ce A-1-A. ----i NODE A-Da- X: F- 0 U) Lu z Lu cr 0 NODE �11" --NT- 6725 YORK AVE. I—, — ...... .... .. ...... ... BOLLARD LIGMTNG ........ .. .. .. ..... .. .............. A-1 EC%- E.� 1.1- ACCESS -T. COLORED & CONCRETE 0 cf) w z w w x w x MNT mROI SRILW KK ST --VP BOLLARD LIONTNG ALONG PATH -SEE ELEC APCNIECNRK NODE AT ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 EFVRq NS 213506 ESG_ ESG_ PLAN NDRIN 6725 YORK AVE. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AO.1 WEST SIDE OF SITE (ALONG YORK AVE.) NW CORNER OF SITE SE CORNER OF SITE VIEW NORTH OF SITE (FROM YORK) 6725 YORK AVE. EAST SIDE OF SITE (ALONG XERXES AVE.( .......... I ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NE CORNER OF SITE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1212014 SE CORNER OF SITE 21 3506 ESC ESC --l- 6725 YORK AVE. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS VIEW SOUTH OF SrIlE (MOM YORK) AO.2 Mw M n U vo q I M is ENID= 11!111 i �1 ■�O1 4 P sells ■ RAI P., IS off 9 ip p so Jim v Los Ilk 9 as s Io • 7� es 1 � �. ,I „ �I �' 1► I I I- 11 as 11 I I� II i�l �' I ■ I■ _ _� s• —a �■ �� �.. i ' It l I'N 4 f IV h \p !� 11 X11 It �1 n 1 ■■ a tt , I! �I:� ■I I' �' II II II I' 11 II 14 II !I H I U ' t . O 0 STUCCO COLORS ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE •� =�i. A[YISIO NS 213506 ESC ESC 6725 YORK AVE. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATFEIltl A0.5 6725 YORK AVE. EA.— MN IA I! BAICK.:. Y[iLOYI Bean -TrGAR N >s Ic • p —E -CA.OSwN U BRM .A n c s- -BLACK ORF.GM - TAN BA LIETNeANEI-SKARD11 H Y G BEA CEMENT"..- RAv FlBERCEMENT lDARDnDMN BMINII snccOn x x B—N sncGO. lRDSVN sncm a�. wRR eRDNxE ro M sncco « cnAr FlBERGLABS DISTGAE RNRRONSE M W 9! SNED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ALUPA BREN -NETAI BAEAN.ETAI n -O.RK BRONZE Rc ED AGE &1E.U( —AL IN BREAM BREAKn IALM -BPOWN BREAK METAL b - TE •�lro..w, .1........, . w R. Is. . n e. m ,�ss.Yls a. c N< e m ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE •� =�i. A[YISIO NS 213506 ESC ESC 6725 YORK AVE. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATFEIltl A0.5 6725 YORK AVE. A FLOW PLAN MERAL NOM fd in.. Y Y LL BLLOVEMLL WYENSNDNS TOON&DE FNOE OF NYSONRV OR OUTSIDE FBOE OF EK .,R ENEA -. 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 ss9- w y.• I1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I II j I I I I (STISEET LEVEL) 1 10 �1- 'T IT 7 I 1 � s I I I I I I I I I 1 I I II I I -Al - — ii .1........ en 9-- —NO." 50D — :inp<pn .r n m lnnup l,. m .•..... p i3 n9 �O15 5 0 0 M6 5 3 w w e Y1�Y ii ISSUED FOR - - - -- REFERENCE ONLY i - - CONSTRUCTION nnm- i Y Yid Y ii���i I �1 II I I I I I I I I I I I I it I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I 1 1 I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I rd- — - EE I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I L 1 1 1 1 1 I I I b I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P1 - BLO mr -.a CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORICINAL155VE o.i.�i..�. REV ISID N5 Ne. De.<<ip.ion O.te 213506Y, <. ADtho Ch-ke 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL PI (PARKING) Al .0 .1........ en 9-- —NO." 50D — :inp<pn .r n m lnnup l,. m .•..... p i3 n9 �O15 5 0 0 M6 5 3 w w e ISSUED FOR - - - -- REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR - - CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORICINAL155VE o.i.�i..�. REV ISID N5 Ne. De.<<ip.ion O.te 213506Y, <. ADtho Ch-ke 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL PI (PARKING) Al .0 6725 YORK AVE. Edinn. 4N CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/72/2014 GAIGINAL ISSUE ........ ItlYISID.1 D. o- E5G E5G ...... I --. 11 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P1 (PARKING) Al Oa So .. .... . .... -i 7011' 7--- IS." P. 6 1 2 3 3 9 1 S I. IS I I I 3 1 1 3 ... .. ...... ..... .... . ......... ..... ...... ...... .. ... [-.77 ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/72/2014 GAIGINAL ISSUE ........ ItlYISID.1 D. o- E5G E5G ...... I --. 11 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL P1 (PARKING) Al Oa 1T T 4 � � � � P�� � 10 11 12 13 14 15 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL PI 6725 YORK AVE. 11m.- .... ....... ... polls minneaeu•SS.eIS . . . . . . . . . . ... . ......... I ---s CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE ...... REV Isloms 213506 A,th— Check- 5 ...... cm 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR PLAN LEVEL PI (PARKING) Al Ob ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I ---s CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE ...... REV Isloms 213506 A,th— Check- 5 ...... cm 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR PLAN LEVEL PI (PARKING) Al Ob (�I OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES —1— DlkEENSONS TO OUTSIDE EOF �NRY M OUTSIDE ME OF pOE —NO 19 ) 110 (� (� (� 114 115 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 @ m_ 6725 YORK AVE. [din., NN eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL E .11--.. REVISIONS o... 213506 —1— ...— Author Ch-k- ...... 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR FL N - LEVEL I (STREET LEVEL) Al .1 d m lei IN- MOM 1911111111110, \ e . � _6r., . . . . . . . . . . . . ra"Amll IIL I �� uu - ■��ull Em ow A Wollml ;=BIC OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 @ m_ 6725 YORK AVE. [din., NN eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL E .11--.. REVISIONS o... 213506 —1— ...— Author Ch-k- ...... 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR FL N - LEVEL I (STREET LEVEL) Al .1 NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL I 6725 YORK AVE. Edina, MN CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 D RIG IN A L BS V E ......... REVISIONS No. D.— i p I i. 213506 —1— -- Author Checker 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN — LEVEL I (STREET LEVEL) A 1 . I a soo 7 ........ I 1 3 1 5 1 1. 6 3 3 9 1 3 It A .d ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 D RIG IN A L BS V E ......... REVISIONS No. D.— i p I i. 213506 —1— -- Author Checker 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN — LEVEL I (STREET LEVEL) A 1 . I a 10 it 12 13 14 15 !2yj FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL I Nufi -(D K L 6725 YORK AVE. Edl— — eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OS/12/2014 ORIGINAL 155UE: REVISIONS N.. 213506 ESG Esc w.-z. —cko IV 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR P AN - LEVEL i (STREET LEVEL) A 1 . 1 b 1� T ter -s in OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 I T OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES T it 7 7 --.- T 7 --(D WE Ko l --(D --o 6725 YORK AVE. Ed i... UN eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OS/12/2014 ORIGINALBSUE: at IsioNs N.. o- 213506 Author Checker 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 Al .2 .. . . . . . . . . . . || | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | ( - --'- ��- -__ - �-- - __ --'- -�---------- -�-__ ----_� - ------'----/----- __-__�------' ----�-_ ------- �-----' ---'-�_ - -_'- --'--�- - .. . . . . . . . . . . || | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | ----rr- -----''� ton FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 | | on5 YORK AVE. -------- CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 051 12/201 4 ESC ESG 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL Al .2a / ' | IV. I V^ |".1, 1. 6 1 2.3 3 9. s 3 is / n _�� c/ __~__-~__ .'~~ ,' ..... ,.......... ===- --��\ c/ ===_ | \�/ / ISSUED FOR REFERENCE | ONLY NOTF0R A�----'--��\ CONSTRUCTION -------- CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 051 12/201 4 ESC ESG 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL Al .2a 6725 YORK AVE. Eli..... ...... ....... ... ..... .. ..... ......... . ....... .... -'. .... .. ......... OPEN TO R AIL 7 SEE AMENITY TERRACE J PLAN ON 2 A1.2c I SEE COURTYARD PLAN ON I/ A1.2C I BELOW , - - - - - E5 -- ---- ISSUED FOR =4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFERENCE 0 ONLY PEN ZTOR AIL a C' , 7k 0 NOT FOR .. CONSTRUCTION 17 -7u tt:_M�j =44 T L F7 !ft Ll jW. A II I 0 r -r— IL r--j M, (Q 6,a llTH r 2 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1212014 OR-NALBSUE RE ISIONS 213506 I-- .... 1. Author Ch—ker 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL z Al .2b T T MUM All . . ---'-_—��� --- ' -------/�� ------'- ------�«} --'-------.----- �� ._� .. --------�---'- ---- trryTERRACE PLAN . . . . . | | | | | . . . | | | . . . | | | | Tyr ARD PLAN orzs YORK AVE. eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL ORKINAL —E: 2 13506 AuIhor Checker 6725 YORK AVE. COURTYARD PLANS Al .2c 17 4t c OP RETAIL� BRUNEI Al MUM All . . ---'-_—��� --- ' -------/�� ------'- ------�«} --'-------.----- �� ._� .. --------�---'- ---- trryTERRACE PLAN . . . . . | | | | | . . . | | | . . . | | | | Tyr ARD PLAN orzs YORK AVE. eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL ORKINAL —E: 2 13506 AuIhor Checker 6725 YORK AVE. COURTYARD PLANS Al .2c e� I I I I I I ra -si2 4 -EYE' i6 -6 14 -P 2g�P I I I I 1 I I OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL Au mr. ra OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.NLLOVEMIL PL@19p16 TO OIK M FAOE OF MASONRY OR OMEE Fn EOF EKIERRRR 5>•EN -M. 10 11 12 13 14 15 I I I I I I I I I a b 6725 YORK AVE. Edina, UN esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIOIN.L KSYE: arrar.�oi. REV KIONE N.. Onrrription ppta 213506 ANEh., Checker 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL53 -5 Al .3 7-- T arT �J—j L1 r; RTH FLOOR 6725 YORK AVE. U I... .. No" --.--T"TIOM .... . ..... .. .. . ...... ...... ......,assns .............. --.--T"TIOM .... . ..... .. .. HANGING pFLfLNV,T ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION fTVPr CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL BS- REV IsIoNs o. De.criPlian D- 213506 ESG ESG 6 72 5 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 -5 Al .3a HANGING pFLfLNV,T CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL BS- REV IsIoNs o. De.criPlian D- 213506 ESG ESG 6 72 5 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 -5 Al .3a IT T ----- --' ______ RETAIL L !H ROOF . . . aro YORK AVE. ........... ~_�� ....... y.'| ....... ... �'- .. .. ........ ---s CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL Author Ch-k- 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL Al .3b -------- ------|| . . )| ---'---'-��----- _ . . . . . . . . | | | | | | | | | | | � ' � PLAN - LEVEL 3-5 !�UTH FLOOR CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL Author Ch-k- 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL Al .3b OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1-- dN0190N.R TO dRS FLOE OF—OROU--EOF EKIE— dKL g?r!!�41L FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 res 6725 YORK AVE. Ed 1— MN eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 0—INAL 5SUE; REVISIONS D- 213506 Author Checker ..— , 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 Al .6 Q. LWI m M Wl ■ 3, m -00- m 14 • _ e - 1 rim 41 1p . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIIIIII - _- _ �- 1i= 'I =� •ill• Lu•f g?r!!�41L FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 res 6725 YORK AVE. Ed 1— MN eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 0—INAL 5SUE; REVISIONS D- 213506 Author Checker ..— , 6725 YORK AVE. OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 Al .6 6725 YORK AVE. lill'..... ........... ...... .. 4 5 6 77 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 s• I 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 T I I I I I I I I I I I I �14 I r °.a..ey.re.e...+.rx......,. ----- -------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- I-------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -I t ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------------- -i I I I I t n OD A ISSUED FOR tv, T7 " hn' Lv _m 2 REFERENCE L F" ONLY CIE a i � Ell, t-1 � - A , 22, CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR 4+, Li J-1- 00 r TMm .......... ----------- I ---- ------- IL NORTH FLOOR PLAN - CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OS/12/2014 ORIO INALIMSUL REV ill- ... O."I'lip- ll- 213506 ESG- ESG 6725 YORK AVE. NORTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 Al .6a T T T T , or2S YORK AVE. eSG CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 6725 YORK AVE. SOUTH FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL Al .6b HOOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES I. ROOFIS RLLLl51ED EPd.1 -SEE ASSELHIES 2 ROOF TD SLOPE AON W' PER FOOT, TYP 1 0.UFWH0 VFNTS NOT SNpVN .. PROVIDE RJO WNIYIM AVERAGE 5. IrB' SADDLES NOT ALLOW ®. NO RGEPROpH B. CORRIDOR RIVSPPOVIDE CUimS AND FLASHING . PROVIDE CONTNIlOUS WALItWAV PIDS FTOM ACCESS IMTCN TO ALL LEUW11CAl y�.y' ! Im I, 1 ZP -C 1 14.T 1 N -C 1 A -y 1 3y -IT 3T.P Y'B' I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 4 m- /I - 1 1 I 1 § I I § anrzalm�` ❑/t I 1 I I I I I I I �� oIAGRAN.TC awv, I I I I & I µy�fgY /Fjpp�E01lIPl II 1 6725 YORK AVE. Edm.. uN .i..aa am..... p,. F.m .rcFN. cla S00 w e n pollapm ., SS.pitS m infin p' t L i; nyea elf 5 0 ww +.pap rc Fcom ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 OAIOINALISSOG mrowo�. REVISIONS Ne. OeacriPlion Date 213506 ESG ESG 6725 YORK AVE. ROOF PLAN Al .7 ----------- ---- - --- - V.-IN AU., --7w w7i SOL on MM:-7 lv:Af min . ..... .... .... -- - -- ----- -Al. on ME_ lVAU, ----- -- - ------ 1 No mv ----- ----------- MIKE, ------------------- _7 ME - wrl INI z IF in IgA WE [IMM112,110PRI - "Wo HN' Roo 111C.9m- --- ----- -Womm m- — 11 mm ------- -------- ------- __=_===___________ = ----- ----- ------------------ - --------- ----- - ---- ---------- -- ----- ----- -------- - --------- --- - --------------------------- �wm��=�==�=,._.== ----------------- ---------- - ------ �===�� ---- -------- — -------------- nor -- --------------------------- - --- --- - --- - ------------ lIT ----------------- I L -------- --- -- -------------------------------- - - ---- -------------------- - --------------- lill 1 F4 fl,' fj I R Plal "016 a I 11C Rt C'10M Q, PEI w-Al Lu" Wall- MEMO Aw Z M I 1211,11 NJ w In rr-:� L! 7 T roi ----I Iff's-m— -1 W, WN NEI IMF 7n Ilse No inn --------- -- 1. MGM . ..... ... ... -- --- ------ - I ME, AI Q'i IMOWL".9 no wovlmm%l an -------------- ----- -- - ----- - -------------------- --- - ----- ------- ---------------------------- ------- - ------- ------------------------------- ----- - --- -- ------ ------------- ==M___.__=_. ------------- --- - - ------ - --------------------- ------------------------------- - - - — ---------- - --- -- --------- --- ----------------------------- - ----- --- -- - --------- - ---- ------- -------------------------- — ----- - ----- == ------------ ---- =�=== ION !I —R.-Mool HIM I 1 11; loll-Edill ivy"'! 1 IN uz on rl; UPI 1 0 1 m Rm F, . Wl rpm, m fflw- I - --------- - ------------------- - ____G rut, r ------- -- ---- - -- -- - - ------ - --------- ------- --- mum ------- _r IN -ol il rrm My --I Nil --NJ Z Chi olit: IN r low' I n I I Irl.9 I I I I T-11 I I vig A, 1111 Ik [1� I "ll Fil-lim Pull P-HIll,:_ �!v -!i:ll FIR-11IIIIHI Ile --i! ---ns 119011 es s EAST CTYD - EAST ELEVATION Fus Inr. ra• NOTE SEE COLOR ELEVATIONS FOR REFERENCE EXTMM MATERIAL KEYNOTES IA BRRO.MLL OW IB BRICIF TAN IG BRICKRREIDISN CAST ARCHITECTU B'IO IiTc H RAL IE CREAM !0 ARCINECNRAL CASE STOIE -BLACK ROOF FACE aOCT( METAL PANEL A pARX BRONIE M FIBER CEMOIT ®Ai0 /T Gf�I' 'A /f Flf1ER CE1 B6U04DARR BROTIRE STUCCO tl@AY R STUCCORTAN R) ST60p GREY M DAW(BRON2E FlBERGLISSWMOOWAOOR. TVP IB PREFiNW ®KUICHIW STOREFIONT SI'STEY Y BREAK RETAI II -GIMP IB aREAN r�TAL n -MRN eROr� BRFAN LtET1 X, BIFAN 14 q. CREAl1 A 7. IE BA EA ._ WHIM is PREFIwsIFn MY4iACNRED BALCONY MILING SYS ssrElFp OB PREAn151 ®W WLi/CTUREO BALGOM' sr EYR P TRELLIS i ®FNF➢ffACTURE➢IBI I TRELLIS �1 EAST CTYD- NORTH ELEVATION v v v %1 EAST CTYD WEST ELEVATION AIR Ina-. rd Aaz mlr- rd 3 WEST CTYD - NORTH ELEVATION AS3 Tn6' • I'd uz z WESird CTYO -WEST ELEVATION Inlr. _ R— —V 6 ROOF , 1E isy�,E -e• LEVELS i3a' . 0' & L12EVELS n 3' -- e' ,E aL& T T T , WEST C�YD - SOUTH ELEVATION wia me-. ra RO� WELL" n ,,54' - -B' L.E44 V� ,' -,• LEVEL6 S 13 4 V LEVEL 123' -6 LEVEL 112 -4- ll ROOF n 165' - V 1 LE 154' -6 LEVE� 144' -4' LEVEL 4 I1 134' -7 7 LS 173' EVE L -- B- -V � 2 „z - a- 6725 YORK AVE. F, gin/. YN esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL ISSUE. a�ie„aei. REVISIONS Xo. 0/rRnprbn o- 213506 AuThal Checker o....n c.rc.rR .. 6725 YORK AVE. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.2 ■! ■! ■1 o11 � -00, ,�1!r ■!n 11 11 �� �!■ n �� !I !■ 1! 11 ■! 11 �i �� j! 1! !!I -ion, I! ■! �n I! I! ,���!■ r n�- .!1: !■ ii �� ■! pr �� 1! I! 11,00 x.01 -1 I! ■! �n 141@11,1110- a ,u �_ !I !■ l ' 11 ■! II! ii. -.n !l '' ,.�0. -$S E OM low !■ ■! X11 1! 1! �- �_�I�o� � � '�o� "Y_��' °��^'��_. • ■�� ;==e aka - - = - -- -- __�,�� • n - ; ■! 11 j� i j �� miss on 11 1! !■ o,! !■ � 11 11 ! !■ 11 !1�■! - -, ■! 11 ANN ■� �■ ;`fir ! SO ■o■_ 11 11 !n NNE !■ �� !1 ! �� � !■ I! !1 ■� " , -- ■! !1 ■� j i■ ■ M■ on 11 11 !■ ..■■. !■ ■■ !1 11 ■■ i it oil ; miss M 11 1! is NNN- -E _n in_- �_ ■i ■! 11 0 l-I 11 is �. SEA. ■! !I L1! !I !■ COLOR -H ELEVATION - m ® ® m m O O O O © O © ©O '!p1 m! imm. ! no Nino miss 11 u 11 no ■! 1 .... 11 I, ... 1. !■ 1■ 1! fly- ! on !1 on !1 !o !I a. !1 on ■! °, -, !1 I!! -..I MI••; 11 y 11 °, 11 1■ !■ 1! ■-�, ! mis !! !I !! !I !! ■! !I 11 ■! !1 1! °i 11 !■ - rump Now Y.Y I! 1! !1 111 ! am 11 on 11 ■■ 11 an 11 on ■1 !1 1! ■! !1 1! u; 1! ®a Sul ■1 I!�I!�u�! ■� �� 1! 1! ��. 1! �� !■ �� I! !1 ■� � ■! ;��. !I 1! +■�■���1 �!! i 11111 M1111 1! 11 ,n. !■ !■ In al -1 ■! 1! !o !11 !■ !! !! ■! r ! !,! !1 11 1! !! !!1 1! 1! ,u. '!■ is m 11 ■! 1! no IN !■ p 1! ■! ■! . !1 I! 1! !! vv 1! ...._.: _� ... :._ __= e= r� .■ _+ e- e_ - e .:._:.._ _ .I �_ _...__. �_ .:_ ■! !1- ■! 11 !I II1 1! 1! !■ 1- M !i 1 I !! I! 11 1■ IN! ■! !1 IN 1 11 H H H ■1 H ■! H H I! I !1 I! I! is m !I I! m I! 1! !■ !I is m !11 !I 0 1 EAST Ax. O O © O © O .. \. I� ��. �! N !1 f■ ill !1 �m RpBl■ i • �� �� �! a !1 rid !1 �� 1! � ��. \ i �.NE son , i ■■ �� �■ !1 ■■ ■ !1 �� 1! ■ ■o - !1 �r _ lino e a :Ie wEr�; , • ROOF l� X65' -0' - ��... ■ir— ..UMiaBBe, ■ —•• ■�� ■ - -V ie is t - -° • IN19n.1 IW W • pla • I I I ROOF t85' -D' LEVEL 6 154'.8" LEVEL 5 W-4' -I-EYE.L 4 1341-01 LEVEL3 123'- 8' 11I If -11 LEVF_ L 2 & 24- 1 s WEST CTYD . SOUTH ELEVATION - COLOR A1. ,llb' • I'V EXTERWR MATERIAL KEYNOTES BRKN. YELLOW fB BPKNnTAN ,L A gREDALw TST ARG —TURAL CAST STONE CREAK ]A RGG(FELTURAL CAST STgRE -BLRLN ROO( FACE BLOCK PANELrl DARK FIBS BRONZE BA FlBER CELEN} BOARD. GREY eB FlBEP CEMEM BDARDn MRN BRDrvZE 5T11LC0 rl CREAM ZB STUCCO n TAN ZD STUCCO. G REY IA DARN BRDNZE FlBERGL SS WWDDw.DDOP. I. W AA PREFlNI —A KUNGRAY STOREFRONT SYSTEM 9A BPEMt METAL DARv 9B BRFAN METAL r3 � DARN BRONZE sc BRFANMETUqcPEAM R1 BFE,AN TAN. I. BREAN PETAL NA NUFA IPA PREFINISHED MANUFACNRED BALCONv SST1I DS PREFlISHED MANUFACTURED BALCONY SYS EMn IOC PPEFlNISHED MANUFACTURED RAILING SYSTEM ELLIB 16 ENiRUDED ALUMIrvUM SIGNAGE BAND O © O © O O in vl\e �� p! 1! 1! it !!. !■ !1 ER E EN !I „ m ins 1! 1! I! !1 No. in !1 .ME !� no �1 nu :ua I�In - a.�. mm - ISO H on-in H oil No mm 1 II us li 'llim ld,. III.4�11 - � ROOF � 165' 0U- 1l ill YN1� - ■ on .■■ 11 !N !1 11 E! p! on . J. pMYI - T -- ■i u ■- �1 !� MAN !m �! 1! m- MIn nL\w - REM ® !■ 1! - m ■! M!: 11 Em , 6725 YORK AVE. Win.. MN esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ORIGINAL BSVE. aL.I mi. REVISIONS N.. D —ri,—. D.I. 213506 Author Checker 6725 YORK AVE. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COLOR A3.4 TT T T T T T T TT (p !'� Section @ Pool Terrace T ITT T T T T T T TT T gnn.�g Section @ Landscape Court Icing Section Through Retail/Amenity Court ROOF LEVEL J� LEVEL LS _ LEVEL 4 1. Lg L 154 W LEVBI 134 01 LEVEL_. LEV IQ-�l BD �01 UE LEVEL4 _LEVEL_ 2 4� LEVEL - 6725 YORK AVE. Ed i— .. eSG ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 213506 E5G ESC 6725 YORK AVE. BUILDING SECTIONS A4.1 GENERAL NOTES I srcoly Survey o_c!'r.!e end bear.nq basis: He .nepm County Coord`ncte System 61 NAD83 (:98 mza• a yens ens 3 Nut. 1xii AV! 1129.SiP . ,I L -seg'54'43T 2) At --ie time field wo� was De.-formed for this survey. there was c s.9nifiecrit 129.2,71 amount nt snow u 'Ph were located to the best a . of, sr. on ground. ystccl features Q - b * our - - but there y be additiorici !eaiures that were not vis'b;e end, ti T-M, ferefore.' iy, hereon. ce as in not sra.m h ecn 11 w-an.6 UTILITY NOTES A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH T U U 0 U S observed LINE OF VACATED WEST 68TH STREET---,, ak l-) Utiiity information from Dians end mork;ngs was combined with ,obser ;5 'i �, - it. - �7-, L. % A PONT i.8! FEET NORTH evidence of u0ities to develop a view of the underground utilities shown AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A&I I I TRACT D. RLS NO. 432 Or SOUTHEAST COVER - ;� I hereon. However, elockingdexcavotion.sthe exact lion of underground (I I T u U I IN 0 U S 2 OF 12 features cannot b occur tely. compi ly and I reliably depicted. Where TRACT 0. RILS NO. 43 e UJ MI t r.loca Tc 4 is t v - IN 11�1 a,. - I , ,, I I additional or more detailed information is required, excavation may be PART 01 CZ 1.11 O. it I necessary. vu+ 43 X04 Te e 2.) Other underground utll;ties of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all r- I _j 1. E, 1 1- fie I ___ 7i_. 70, 1 ;41 Tr utilities critical to construction or design. `,XA0 IMTO I M, 4 20 i0000 "a F9 3.) Some underground utility locations ere shown as marked on site by those 7 co� AS 7, Tq rc P2 1, i'K4� lw� 2 • T. utility companies whose locators responded to Our Gopher State One Call, F ticket numbers 131281077, 140340094, 140340092, 140340091. 140340086 and 11 A 140340085. vii \j T - -1 - _\�_ - T 8 - I di co _MXJX S, S '1 417* Ms Mir k Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for C I Uj - 4.) to precise on site location of utilities prior to any excavation. -.0 1 71 H 7W0AThL_PA,.%T or -si LS NO. 4M Tc I CORNER OF 2 J.-_ IT Tc TC P. RLS NO. 432 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED eau Ic (Por Cisi-tifi.c.L. of Title No. 1159936) w-erle sr jV t:l.zc as 9- ro'-.0 (r," All that po,L of wcoted West 67th Street dediected In the plot of Tenraceu lying De 1 We', or o line n:nrn from the Southeast comer of Tract 0, Registered Lond,surwy No. Is I Tract P of said Rai$ st of a time drown from the South.-It carrier of said Tract G to the Northwest corner of �� eelA _ q F �� 1 maT /� j/ t Tract P: and 'N all that part of weated York Avenue South. dedicated in the plot of "York Terrace', Q and all that part of Tract P. Registered Land Survey No. 43Z and all that pan of Tract my F. Registered Land Survey No. 629. lying Nor "in M MU t 5. Block Z North of the for 9 described line, Beginning the Northwest eorn� of L. "York Terrace', thence running Westerly parallel With the South line of wooled West 68th Street dedicated in the plot of 'York wq, be Terrace", and its Westerly extensions to a pon I .,Op 'In. -S,T so, Tirclatim'.1th.0" Westerly ,*I sold Tract F, and itimi'lPTA X, there terminating. and all that pa Tract 0. Registered A of said Land Surrey No. 437_ and all that part of wooled York Avenue South ded1cated In the sn'SRLS Of t of •'York Ternme', lying South of the fol" ing described roe; Elogtinning at a point say rawer sir 1= wr follow in inothe.tost line of mid Tract Q. mid point being I . at fast North of the Southeast v, sm nww `Dibl� .. Srs &4 am 5. A10. 52-0 corriv of mid Tract 0 as measured along the East fine thereof, themes, running Westerly 10, parallel with said South fine of vocated West 68th Street and its Westerly extension to a c 47-M.". . - point in Um Wastady line of sold Tract F. and them terminating. f. me Tc t AND nl 1 „ asrK.0 1 °' / - I w I �' poor /�,•1� -o L� I Lot 1, Simi 2. '.York Terrace" %9 • A z T (Certificate of Title No. 1934(9) i= swy woop1mcK eiAviwo I L I AND O 6725raw� A VENLE Sa UW\ i I Iz "York Terrace' am, ilk Lot Z Block 2. V I I -sm (CertifIcatis,of Title No. IUR57) Q ---{ - - • -- / i c� I 1z Z; AND .caul I •sj r%'lr',.r'r e I :C I ./� ^M'I Lai 3. Block Z 'York Terrace' umplau L 2. .2. Me (Certificate of Title No. 1100461D) 49" S&I r Lot 4 Block Z 'York Terrace' .; I d •�� cue v/o �°S• 1 e s/ \ill `n :v`�00 iS� •s�o�. 1 anJ �/� ^ (Certificate of Title No. 1145680) AM aim L • ------- - (W.Block, r! "York Terrace" be Is a Title No. 1380227) ,a rc ;gt LINK In east - - I - - - - ami I And part of vacated West 67th Slir"I par City Resolution Doc Na. 47,14665 its. W.4 11 T, 11 -.90 .Tf--' TK 884J '"b" Is located In Hennepin •cast {ice Al A in qt.-" T Ir , 11TLE COMMITMENT Tc z F 7F .&N,s �Fst k Y. ! t� is TC e 4x 'il� h Lr -so IN a Z appurtemancM and encinimbrioncas in addition to those shoWn hereon. This Ic This survey was prepared Without. the benefit of current title Work. EastrinemIlLs. Cie. survey.1s subject to revision upori =0 of a current title insurance. commitment or Ott-Iis Va. plition. >% less zk, TC° A& MIA "a"I 3 m.. sole s Aq acv any NI I - \, ssAo - M L . go" a M. me Area 201.407 square feet or 4.824 mmm, GARAGE ce Tustin I. thereby certify that this survey. Ion. or report Wets 7 Mits-, Two I, hotb[ am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the -M14 c;,uss -.61 a). . I- ' 0. V ZIM p qd by me or tinder my direct supeirv7stion and CONCRETE my aws 0 " I h 4 r the State of Minnesota. �ajozV .�T - T e ■ It Dated this 13th day of February. 2014 jr-dV) ssia. all 8 1 T U 9 1 IN 0 U S ev�. NG IV89 *57 2JW �1 To j7la� Sir 5 "as cft miot: 5jj 86 -scus Z 5 SONDE LAND/SURVE'P `Mistl; "res S.CrL - - - - - - A LINE IRMALILD WITH THE SO THWEST COVER OF LOT 5. 7- cipor ffh!�� 1p 1 11 t fr LINE OF VACATED WEST SM STREET BLOCK 2, YORK TERRACE CT 2 Leonard F. Carlson. P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 4Q9O AM ITS WESTMY EXTENSION L"/% A' [AlAdged.lots to east JJWD 12/13/2014 f'% A r- PIV DA. post lhfti,tor rh'w� PIK a.- - P.%Ig .1tr UAS Dnotes so...as t1_ A' I_ L: 17' 1/ I-S lf� pps I BENCH MARKS (13M) N.G.M.0 29 LEG= DIP Denotes ductile I- pip, Derates P_. pd. VIR Osma, Birch thes DrawshIt MAX, PpLP Demotes -Dower we 14ht owe Box Danie(" Beatific, t- 0 D-' I --t I -..d ED a- Denotes itlect'lic -W PVC O~ss pollw1hyllchlorlse Pipe CDT Denotes Cattar-ood'imse BOUNMR K L OCA 770JV 70PO~HIC with P.L.S. N.44890 DA RCP Denotes Intomied -cnirts pip. CRAB 0 .. 1. Crbappl. fry I.) Top or top nut of 2.d fine,hydrarit south C_.tes electric meter Dome FM Denotes fire hoohm RD tes roar EVO Derist. imergisism tree 8fWLMU7Y$VRWYFM' of 66th St. the east side of York Ave. OcrI found kom __l rp Daniel" flog pd S AN 0-,11:: 11 ft4 Oki L4] �2. 0" 132 CORNER Efenction 98&52 feet G Den tes gutter SAN Damet L ENNA R MUL 7 7F"IL Y IN VES TORS, L L C UST OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS is S 6, LOC 0 .. 1. L-.t t- c o UPIL D-t- Map[ t- AC -.1. A O.-t- go meter SIAH Disiot. St- AN Denotes ok. tine The falcriving hat of possible encroachments is only the 2.) Top of post a theost corner Sao Demot..'torticuu., CP D Id -1 SPOT D-ot. epigt PINA, Dam to mid bl. tree EDNA MINNESOTA Indic t" I" near so' of bldg no. 6-125 York Avenue So. BE Demot. bualsmg,:`IL� GIN a-. tr. ST S Derates t- Mwor SHIB opinion of this ItUrvity0n should not be interpreted as a legal a, y Dencles, t-pb opinion and should not be interpreted as . complete Feting, Elevation = 887.11 feet BTL Denotes b- curb NCR Denotes handicap romp T13 D"*t" SPR Denotes spricc, if" u` 0' Ce Denotes catch basin HIS osiiotirs Nordl-p *I,, TIC Derict i*.iPe"of_eb_"to 6 TO Din.t.. mclo-ii, t- =5= CDOX Denotes central bow HHC iM ham hCd* Con,vm,radatiM TICS De- [,.fflc cont'd s19, ft SONDE - 9,- ( ;W-01 ❑ Possible encroachments we indicated on survey With boxed 3.) Top or top nut of 3rd fire hydrant south cgx D-L es - - Icati- b. HYD oeiioi� Or. hydrant TP-414S D=" ",umsuinjumG 952-M.-2455 Cl- 952-am-2m) letters as listed below. of 66th Sit, an the east 2! of York Ave_ ap D-I•. -.1 trot pim "V O_aL., truirt- I.-t Voc Diriolm" ground curtmu b:tlo, line West Office. Elevation - 883.45 fast CLP oswet" clot"idslis Pat. LP light pole LIGE Demoll. -d. -d dectri. r- 30 0 30 60 North Dake� 701-663-5502 Concrete pad across, south time or Lot 4, Block 2. CWH d* NB D-t- 1*1I W D-1. ..t. line 0.1e, cup O_= gt.4 in.1.1 pipe NH Denotes 2 WST Demotes wood steps 4.) Top of Lop nu R.P hydrant in northeast quadrant of -4 SCALE IN FEET of,, COL. D- su, lziW.. OD `" h 4 wv Denotes wot,,, �d. 114 1 f 1 Denotes Xerxes Ave and 67 St 0 CS D-l•• curb OHC .0 _I"U_ 'he WIN D- - window W.11 evotion 879,15 feet CST D-tes -cmit. top OHU -hd Unity Me Wei Deriottes _cd -0 b.. Denotes To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL qZ��A, w, Ol 1e ` 1888 Agenda Item #: VI.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Final PUD Rezoning, Final Development Plan, Lennar Corporation,: 6725 York Avenue, and 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue., Res. No. 2014 -69 and Ordinance No. 2014 -6. Action Requested: Final Rezonina to PUD. Planned Unit Development District & Final Development Plan Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -69, approving the Final Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and approve the Final Development Plan. Waive second reading and approve Ordinance No. 2014 -6 establishing the PUD- 6.Zoning District. Planning Commission Recommendation: On May 28,2014 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan; Vote: 5 Ayes, 0 Nays. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) The Commission added two conditions: 1. The applicant work with staff to develop a landscape' -plan for boulevard areas and if any.existing trees are lost, they be replaced. 2. No signage shall be allowed on Xerxes Avenue. These two conditions were incorporated into Condition #2 and #8 in the approving Resolution No. 2014 -69. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan per the findings and conditions outlined in the attached Resolution. Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision -July 1, 2014) Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, and build a six -story, 240 unit upscale apartment building with.11,500 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spaces would be available along the north, and south lot lines for resident guests. (See location, narrative and plans on pages Al -A46 in the Planning Commission Staff Report, and larger scale plans in the attached development book.) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50147St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Page 2 . . This request has.received the following approvals from the City Council: ➢Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density; ➢Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢Preliminary Development Plan. The proposed plans are consistentmith the approved Preliminary Plans, including the revised plans submitted to the City Council on May 6th. (See minutes on pages A81k- A81n.) Revisions included moving the building 10 feet to the west away from Xerxes Avenue, reducing the square footage of retail space, and creating an additional setback of 8 feet on the top floor corners of the building on Xerxes. (See attached Preliminary Development Plans on pages A52 —A54.) The following is therefore requested for this final'review: ➢Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R -1, Single Dwelling-'Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; (Including.a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD Zoning District.) and ➢Final Development Plan The proposed plans are consistent with the approved preliminary development plans. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No.:2014 -69 • Ordinance No. 2014 -6 • Planning Commission minutes, May 28, 2014 • Planning Commission staff report dated May 28, 2014 RESOLUTION NO 2014-69 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM PCD =3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND R- 1,,.SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTAND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 6725 YORK AVENUE AND 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 AND 6628 XERXES AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01, , Lennar Corporation is proposing to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes, at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, and build a six- story, 240 unit apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. Final Rezoning from PCD -3; Planned Commercial District and R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 2. Final Development Plan. 1.04 On April 9, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 1 Nays.. Denial was based on the layout of the project. 1.05 On April 30, 2014, Lennar submitted revised plans to address some of the project layout concerns raised by the Planning Commission. 1.06 On May 6, 2014, the City Council approved the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.04 On May 28, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina;; Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov a 952 - 927 -8861. Fax 952- 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-69 Page 2 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center - CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 4. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. 5. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. 6. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 7. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 8. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-69 Page 3 g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower, density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Final Develop_ ment Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following .plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2014 • Building materials board as.presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of the City Code. The applicant must work with staff to develop a landscape plan for boulevard areas and if any existing trees are lost, they be replaced. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one. -half times the cost amount for completing the - required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Any plantings in the right -of -way of York Avenue must meet the requirements of Hennepin County. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5.' The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 7. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-69 Page 4 8. All signage for the site must meet the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District regulations. No signage shall be allowed on the Xerxes side of the project. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo ' dated April 2, 2014; including that all public utility easements shall be dedicated to the City. 10. At the time of building permit application, compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the chief building official's memo dated March 27, 2014. 11. Continue to work with Hennepin County to secure a left turn in lane from south bound York Avenue. 12. Approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding consideration of R -1 property within a PUD, prior to final rezoning. 13. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14. Metropolitan Council approval of the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 17, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk txti� b�� A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Certificate of Title No. 1159936) All that part of vacated West 67`h Street dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace" lying West of a line drawn from the Southeast corner of Tract Q, Registered Land Survey No. 432 to the Northeast corner of Tract P of said Registered Land Survey and lying East of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of said Tract Q to the Northwest corner of Tract P; and All that part of vacated York Avenue South, dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace ", and all that part of Tract P, Registered Land Survey No. 432, and all that part of Tract F, Registered Land.Survey No. 629, lying North of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 5; Block 2, "York Terrace ", thence running Westerly parallel with the South line of vacated West 68`h Street dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace ", and its Westerly extensions to a point in the Westerly line of said Tract F, and there terminating, and all that part of said Tract F, all that part of Tract Q, Registered Land Survey No. -432, and all that part of vacated York Avenue South dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace ", lying South of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the,East line of said Tract Q said point being 1.81 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract _Q as measured along the East line thereof, thence running Westerly parallel with said South line of vacated West 68th Street and its Westerly extension to a point in the Westerly line of said Tract F, and there terminating. AND Lot 1, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 193410) AND Lot 2, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1328257) AND Lot 3, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1100460) O Lot 4, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1145680) AND AX Lot 5, Block 1, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1380227) And part of vacated West 67h Street per City Resolution Doc. No. 4734665 Property is located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. ORDINANCE NO. 2014-6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD -6, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -6 DISTRICT AT 6725 YORK AVENUE AND 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700, AND 6628 XERXES AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to rezone the below described property to PUD, Planned Unit Development in accordance with the following: Sec. 36 -493 Planned Unit Development District -6 (PUD -6) — 6725 York Avenue (a) Legal description: (Per Certificate of Title No. 1159936) All that part of vacated West 67th Street dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace" lying West of a line drawn from the Southeast corner of Tract Q, Registered Land Survey No. 432 to the Northeast corner of Tract P of said Registered Land Survey and lying East of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of said Tract Q to the Northwest corner of Tract P; and All that part of vacated York Avenue South, dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace ", and all that part of Tract P, Registered Land Survey No. 432, and all that part of Tract F, Registered Land Survey No. 629, lying North of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 2, "York Terrace ", thence running Westerly parallel with the South line of vacated West 68th Street dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace ", and its Westerly extensions to a point in the Westerly line of said Tract F, and there terminating, and all that part of said Tract F, all that part of Tract Q, Registered Land Survey No. 432, and all that part of vacated York Avenue South dedicated in the plat of "York Terrace ", lying South of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the East line of said Tract Q, said point being 1.81 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract Q as measured along the East line thereof, thence running Westerly parallel with said South line of vacated West 68th Street and its Westerly extension to a point in the Westerly line of said Tract F, and there terminating. AND Lot 1, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 193410) AND Lot 2, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1328257) AND Lot 3, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1100460) AND Lot 4, Block 2, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1145680) AND Lot 5, Block 1, "York Terrace" (Certificate of Title No. 1380227) And part of vacated West 67h.Street per City Resolution Doc. No. 4734665 Property is located in Hennepin County, Minnesota (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re- development plans received by the City on May 12, 2014 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2014 -69, on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All principal uses allowed in the PCD -3, Planned Commercial — 3 District (PCD -3) Multi- Family Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3 (PCD -3) except multifamily residential. (f) Development Standards. Development standards per the PCD -3 Zoning District, except the following: Building Setbacks Building Setbacks Front — York Avenue 124 feet Front — Xerxes Avenue 47 feet (Stories 1 & 2) 40 feet (Porch) 55 feet (Stories 3 — 6) 50 feet (Porch /Deck Stories 3 -6) 36 -58 feet 36 -59 feet Side - North Rear — South Building Height Six Stories & 68 feet* Maximum Floor 1.22%: Area Ratio (FAR) 2 (g) Signs.shall be allowed per the PM3 standards in Sec. 36 -1714, with the exception that no signage shall be allowed on the Xerxes Avenue side of the development. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 3 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand 'and seal of said City this day of ; 2014. City Clerk B. Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Lennar Multifamily Communities LLC — 6725 York Avenue, 6628 Xerxes Avenue and 6700, 04, 08, 12 Xerxes Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, and build a six -story, 240 unit upscale apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. Teague explained that this request has received the following approvals from the City Council: Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density; Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and Preliminary Development Plan. Teague stated the proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Plans, including the revised plans submitted to the City Council on May 6th. Revisions included moving the building 10 feet to the west away from Xerxes Avenue, reducing the square footage of retail space, and creating an additional setback of 8 feet on the top floor corners of the building on Xerxes. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue and build a six -story, 240 unit apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level subject to the following findings: . The project is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 4. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. 5. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. 6. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 7. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is.guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses,: including retail and multiple family residential; on one site. 8. The `existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded' that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 9. The proposed project would meet the following-goalsand policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should, form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways ■ A Pedestrian - Friendly. Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities 'that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context.and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas.that:serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region.. e. Increase mixed use` development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of..design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate- proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval. is also subject to the following Conditions: I . Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped May 12, :2014. • Utility plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2014 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a.building permit,, a final landscape plan must.,be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Any plantings in the right -of -way of York Avenue must meet the requirements of Hennepin County. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. S. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 7. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. 8. All signage for the site must meet the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District regulations. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014; including that all public utility easements shall be dedicated to the City. 10. At the time of building permit application, compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the chief building official's memo dated March 27, 2014. 11. Continue to work with Hennepin County to secure a left turn in lane from south bound York Avenue. 12. Approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding consideration of R- I property within a PUD, prior to final rezoning. 13. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14. Metropolitan Council approval of the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density. And recommend the City Council adopt the Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD -6 Zoning District. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Development Manager, Lennar Multi - Family Communities and Aaron Russeth, ESG Architects. Applicant Presentation Mr. Chmielewski addressed the Commission and delivered a power point presentation highlighting the revisions made to the plans; specifically pointing out the increased setback and the eroded building corners. Chmielewski introduced Aaron Russeth to further address the revisions. Mr. Russeth told the Commission the architectural design and massing of the project is based on urban design which includes a large opening in the building mass breaking up the south fagade allowing for both increased solar penetration and a view of a vegetative courtyard. Continuing, Russeth said the project has a. contemporary and new street expression. Russeth presented the materials board depicting. building materials featuring transparent glass:. storefront, masonry, and "Edina" limestone at the street. He explained above will float a traditionally inspired composition of masonry, architectural metal and large amounts of glass. Discussion Commissioner Forrest said light pollution is important to her,, adding she wants assurances that no lighting is directed toward the residential properties along Xerxes Avenue. Forrest further questioned if any, signs, monument or otherwise, were proposed for the Xerxes streetscape. Mr. Russeth responded that the lighting proposed would be normal "street lighting" including sconce lighting for the "stoops" on the "townhouse" element. Forrest commented her concern was that the lighting would have more of a "retail feel ". Russeth reiterated the lighting would be what one would expect in a residential setting not a retail setting. Mr. Chmielewski reported a monument sign is not proposed on Xerxes Avenue. Continuing, Forrest asked the development team to emphasize public green space where appropriate. Mr. Chmielewski responded the area is designed with a community.feel, adding . their intent was to be part of the community and neighborhood. Commissioner Schroeder asked what their intent was for the green space on the Xerxes side and if plantings were proposed on the public right -of -way. Mr. Russeth stated their .intent is to elevate the ° "townhome" feel of the building on Xerxes with individual stoops including lighting; however the green space area would be a shared place for the entire building. Russeth said.he can envision residents throwing a Frisbee, etc. in this common area. Continuing, Russeth said they didn't consider the boulevard area but would work with an arborist on what vegetation would work best there. Russeth acknowledged some boulevard trees do exist, adding they, are committed to a tree line. Commissioner Schroeder commented in his opinion if any of the existing trees die during the construction phase they should to be replaced. Russeth responded that would make sense. Commissioner Schroeder referred to sustainable design methods and noted when a PUD is requested the City is looking for items in the project that are extraordinary, adding in his opinion what he's viewed so far is good; but not extraordinary. Mr. Russeth responded that in his opinion the location of the project itself is extraordinary, adding the walkability and area transition adds to this project. Continuing, Russeth pointed out people are now renting by choice, adding this location offers its residents multiple amenities. Russeth further stated the project includes bus access, bike racks, bike storage, dedicated green space, integration of native landscaped environments, tree canopy, storm water management where currently there is none including treating and holding water, paint energy. friendly, LED lighting, White Group input on heating and cooling, low flow showers, etc. Concluding, Russeth said a construction document would be created documenting` all, materials and taken in the project. A discussion ensued on sustainable design features and how they are measured. It was observed -.that the PUD process is a flexible process; however the City hopes that developers strive fora design plan that exceeds what is normally expected. Commissioners acknowledged that it is difficult to require projects to exceed code but the PUD process should offer the flexibility to reach higher than code. Commissioner Forrest commented she would also like to see Lennar develop written tenant Sustainable and safe building practices. Chair Staunton asked if the project includes an affordable housing component. Mr. Chmielewski responded that no affordable housing units are proposed. Continuing, Chmielewski said in discussions with Richfield: it was found that Richfield would not support affordable housing units on this site. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Jim Halvorson; 6700 Xerxes Avenue informed the Commission he has lived in Edina for 62 -years and in'his. opinion this is the time to redevelop this area. Halvorson said in this instance an evolution of the area is occurring, adding no one is the enemy. There is a give and take between communities and taxes are generated by this project that benefits both cities. Chair Staunton..asked if anyone else would like to speak.to the project; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public, hearing. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan'approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder offered an amendment to the motion adding to the conditions that the developer will work with City staff to develop a landscaping plan for the boulevard area and if any of the :,existing trees along`the boulevard are lost as the result of construction that they be replaced. Commissioner Forrest offered another amendment to include as a condition of approval that no signage; including monument be on Xerxes Avenue. Commissioners Platteter and Carr accepted those amendments. Chair Staunton stated he would be voting in favor of the development project. He noted in his opinion the plans have been revised addressing the concerns expressed by both the . ,Commission and City Council. Continuing, Staunton said the Commission continues to be frustrated with the lack of traction on increased sustainable building practices. Staunton,added he is also disappointed that affordable housing wouldn't be added in this-,project; however, he believes the project on the whole is good for the City, Commissioner Platteter said in his opinion this project will be good for the City of Edina. He noted the site sorely needs to .be redeveloped and through the approval process the project has continually improved. Platteter said the amenities of the area are an excellent benefit to the future residents of this building, adding eliminating access from Xerxes Avenue and ensuring the project has a residential feel vs. a commercial feel is also positive. Commissioner Carr stated she also supports the project and complemented all parties on the Process. Chair Staunton called the Vote; Ayes, Schroeder, Forrest, Platteter, Carr, Staunton. Nay, none. Motion carried.5 -0. VII. %Kare TS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. B. Curt As sistant City Manager. W94ddale/Valley View Small Area Plan. Staff Presentation Assistant Manager Kurt addressed a ommission and reported to the Commission the results of a Small Area Plan Su ey she co ucted in March. Kurt said she received responses from 21 individuals; seven r ponses were fr Planning Commissioners; six from the Grandview Executive C mittee, three from t City Council and five from Administration and Community Dev opment Staff. o e �ig s�2 0 �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague May 28, 2014 VI.B. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704,'6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, and build a six - story, 240 unit upscale apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. (See location, narrative and plans on pages Al —A46, and larger scale plans in the attached development book.) This request has received the following approvals from the City Council: ➢ Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density; ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Plans, including the revised plans submitted to the City Council on May 6th. (See minutes on pages A81 k -A81 n.) Revisions included moving the building 10 feet to the west away from Xerxes Avenue, reducing the square footage of retail space, and creating an additional setback of 8 feet on the top floor corners of the building on Xerxes. (See attached Preliminary Development Plans on pages A52 —A54.) The following is therefore requested for this final review: ➢ Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; (Including a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD Zoning District.) and ➢ Final Development Plan The proposed plans are consistent with the approved preliminary development plans. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Automotive Repair & McDonalds; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Easterly: Single - Family Homes in the City of Richfield; these homes are zoned Single - Family Residential, but the Richfield Comprehensive Plan guides them for medium density, 7 -12 units per acre. (See pages A82 —A83.) Southerly: Shopping center including the Edina Liquor Store and Cub Foods; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Westerly: Southdale; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Existing Site Features The subject property is 4.61 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains a retail building with surrounding surface parking and five single family homes on the east side. (See pages Al A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC — Community Activity Center and LDR, Low Density Residential. (See page A4.) Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District & R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District (See page A5.) Site Circulation Access to the site would be from York Avenue only. The curb cut to Xerxes has been eliminated. Both access points would be right -in and right -out only. WSB and Associates conducted a traffic study and recommends a left turn in to the site off York Avenue. (See page A67 and A72 of the traffic study.) The city would continue to work with Hennepin Country for approval of this 2 access. If Hennepin County does not approve the left turn in, the project would still work with the right -in and right -out movements. Access into the two -level underground parking garage for the residential units would be from the north and south side of the building. The north entrance /exit would be to /from the lower level of the garage; and the entrance /exit on the south side would be to the main level. Extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. A new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along York Avenue; and a new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street would be built along Xerxes. (See page A17.) There would be five sidewalk connections into the site from the York Sidewalk; three into the retail space and proposed new building, and two that would extend all the way through the site to connect to the Xerxes sidewalk. This would provide Richfield residents a pedestrian connection to the Southdale area. Traffic & Parking Study WSB and Associates conducted a parking and traffic study. (See the attached study on pages A55 —A76.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there would be adequate parking provided. As mentioned above, the traffic study recommends a left turn in to the site off York. (See page A67 and A72 of the traffic study.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 48 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 59 over story trees, including existing and proposed. The trees would include a mixture of Maple, Elm, Birch, Honey Locust and Pine. (See pages A17 —A19, and the development plan book.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Any plantings in the right -of -way of York Avenue must meet the requirements of Hennepin County. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading for the retail space would take place in the front of the building or at the south side. Trash would be collected within the building and the garbage truck would pick up on the south side. The move in /trash and recycling area for the apartments would take place at the south side of the building as well. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A85. Highlighted items include: a requirement for a developer's agreement for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other public improvements; connecting the water main to the Edina water distribution system, rather than both Edina and Richfield distribution systems; and SAC and WAC fees will be required. Any approvals should be conditioned on the conditions outline in the director of engineering's memo dated May 21, 2014. Building /Building Material The building would be constructed of high quality brick, architectural cast stone, stucco, fiber cement board and metal panels. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. (See renderings on pages Al 1 A15.) A materials board would be presented at the Final Site Plan phase. Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be PCD -3, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. Setback from Single Family Homes Within the underlying PCD -3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings six stories tall be required to be setback twice the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. If the homes on the east side of Xerxes were in the City of Edina a 136 -foot setback would be required from the six -story portion of the building. The six -story portion of the building would be setback 132 feet. (See page A20a.) The Richfield Comprehensive Plan guides those homes for medium density development at 7 -12 units per acre, so the long term plan for that area is to be more densely developed, and not single - family homes. (See Richfield Comprehensive Plan on pages A82 —A83.) Shadow Study The applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacts the height of the building might have on the surrounding area. (See pages A45 —A46.) As demonstrated, the biggest impact would only be for a few hours roughly from 3 -5pm in the winter months when shadows would be cast over the residential homes in Richfield. 4 Floor Area Ratio /Density The proposed density of 52 units per acre would be on the high end of the end of the density range for the City's high density residential development as indicated in the table below. The site is however, located in the CAC, Community Activity Center, which is described as the most intense district in Edina. Floor area ratio (FAR) is the regulatory tool in the PCD -3 Zoning District regarding density. Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 6500 France (Senior Housing) 6500 France 179 76 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69`h & York Apartments 312169"' Street 114 30 The applicant has attempted to address the density concern that was raised at the Sketch Plan and Preliminary review by reducing the number of units from 273 to 242, and now down to 240 units; and reducing the floor area ratio from 1.55 to 1.22. As requested by the City Council, during the review of the 6500 France Avenue Senior housing, the following is a list of suburban examples of high density regulation and development in cities adjacent to Edina: St. Louis Park. St. Louis Park allows densities within a PUD to be up to 75 units per acre in high density and mixed -use districts. Additionally, for PUD's in an office district, if there is a housing component as part of a mixed -use PUD, the City may remove the upper limit on residential density on a case -by- case basis. This happened recently within The West End Redevelopment project. "The Flats at the West End" has a density of 111 units per acre. It is 119 units on a 1.07 acre site. Minnetonka. Minnetonka does not have a density cap within their Comprehensive Plan. They define high density residential as anything over 12 units per acre. Developments are then considered on a case by case basis. Factors that go in to the consideration include: environmental impacts /conditions such as wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes and trees; type of housing; provision of affordable housing; traffic impact; site plan; and surrounding area. Minnetonka does not have an example project similar to the one proposed here. Minnetonka is primarily made up of large lots, with mature trees wetlands and open space. However, their Comprehensive Plan does allow consideration of dense development. Bloomington. The City of Bloomington allows up to 50 units per acre in general; however, in areas that are designated as "High Intensity Mixed Use with Residential" (HX -R District) an FAR minimum 1.5 with a max of 2.0) is required. The density may be increased if the following is provided: Below grade parking; provision of a plaza or park; affordable housing; sustainable design principles; provision of public art. With the exception of the park/plaza; the applicant is proposing all of the other items. Bloomington has had three recent projects that have exceeded a 2.0 FAR: The Reflections condominiums along 34th Ave (95 units per acre); Summer House senior apartments at 98th and Lyndale (59 units per acre); and Genesee apartments at Penn and American Boulevard. (73 units per acre) Given these examples of high density residential development in our surrounding cities, the proposed density would seem reasonable for this site, given its location in a commercial area, with convenient access to Metro Transit bus service. Land Use Within the City of Edina, the existing single family homes on this site are surrounded by commercial area that is guided as Community Activity Center. The only reason these are now guided for low density residential is because of the existing use. They are not uses compatible within the surrounding area within the City of Edina. The uses along Xerxes in the City of Edina typically do not have roadway access onto Xerxes. The proposed development is consistent with that, as the driveways to the existing single family homes would all be eliminated, and no new access would be created. The proposed land use is consistent with the uses allowed in the CAC. Within the City of Richfield, the existing single - family homes are guided in the Richfield Comprehensive Plan for medium density at 7 -12 units per acre. Therefore, Richfield's long term vision for this area also includes higher densities. (See pages A82 —A83.) Height At Sketch Plan and Preliminary review, the Planning Commission and City Council expressed some concern in regard to six stories on the site, especially on the Richfield and Xerxes Avenue side of the site. Podium height was recommended to minimize the height. The applicant has both included a two -story podium on Xerxes, and has moved the building 22 feet back from the road. The setback proposed at Sketch Plan was 25 feet; the proposed setback is now 47 feet. The 3 -6 story set back is proposed at 55 feet. Podium height is also being proposed on the York Avenue side, by bringing the retail portion of the building closer to the street and stepping back the height into the site. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 36 -253 of the Edina City Code provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and VA podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d, ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development, h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing, and % ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which is described as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include retail and residential. Mixed uses are encouraged. The proposal would be a mixture of use within the building with residential and retail. The site would be very pedestrian friendly with extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. A new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along York Avenue; and a new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street would be built along Xerxes. There would be five sidewalk connections into the site from the York Sidewalk; three into the retail space and proposed new building, and two that would extend all the way through the site to connect to the Xerxes sidewalk. These sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections into the Southdale area for residents of Richfield. As recommended in the Comprehensive Plan, and by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the Sketch Plan review, podium height would be utilized on Xerxes Avenue to lessen impact to the single - family homes in Richfield. There would be two -story apartments close to Xerxes, with four additional stories stepped back into the site. The top corners of the sixth story also step back further. 8 The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See page A8.) The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. A green roof is featured. As has been the past practice for PUD's, the applicant should be required to attempt to meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. The proposed uses, retail and multiple - family residential housing are uses allowed in the Community Activity Center, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, and within the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages the mixing of retail and multi - family residential uses. The proposed plans are therefore, consistent with the land uses in Comprehensive Plan. H. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Again, the proposal is for a mixture of land uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall E be,in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As indicated, in the table earlier within thisreport, and the fact that the site is located in a commercial area on York Avenue, near Southdale, Metro Transit and'an arterial roadway, the proposed density and FAR of 1.22 is appropriate for this site. iv, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following, page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed. new building would comply with the underlying PCD -3 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City. rezone this site to. PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Please `note that a few City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout encourages pedestrian movement; would utilize podium height on both Xerxes and York, bringing two stories up to the street on Xerxes, and'stepping back the mass of the building on York. The project would provide mixed use on one site. The design of the building is of a. high quality. Proposed materials include high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass. "Edina" limestone is also proposed at the street level The.development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space within the development. :10 Compliance Table. * Variance would De required under i c:u -s coning PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the plans approved as part the Preliminary Rezoning approval to PUD and approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. 2. As highlighted above on pages 8 -10, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provide a,mixture of use within the building with residential and retail. 11 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — York;Avenue - 76 feet 124 feet Front — Xerxes Avenue (Stories 1 & 2) 35 feet 47: feet (Porch) . 35 feet 40 feet (Stories 3 — 6) 68 'feet 55 feet (Porch /Deck Stories 3 -6) .58 feet 50 feet Side —North 68 feet 36 -58 feet* Rear — .South 68 feet 36 -59 feet* Building Height Four stories and Six Stories & 48 feet 68 feet* Maximum Floor Area 1.0% 1.22 %* . Ratio (FAR) Parking. Stalls 71 — retail 133 spaces exterior (retail & guest parking) 240 enclosed (residential) 291 stalls + 9 ADA Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance would De required under i c:u -s coning PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the plans approved as part the Preliminary Rezoning approval to PUD and approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. 2. As highlighted above on pages 8 -10, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provide a,mixture of use within the building with residential and retail. 11 b. Create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. A new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along York Avenue; and a new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street would be built along Xerxes. (See page A17.) There would be five sidewalk connections into the site from the York Sidewalk; three into the retail space and proposed new building, and two that would extend all the way through the site to connect to the Xerxes sidewalk. These sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections into the Southdale area for residents of Richfield. c. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. d. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative, including a green roof. (See page A8.) The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. (See pages A11 —A15.) e. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 3. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. (See traffic study on pages A55 —A76.) 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. 12 c. - Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Staff Recommendation Rezoning Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue and build a six -story, 240 unit apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 13 3. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 4. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. 5. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. 6. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 7. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 8. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. 14 f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2014 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36- 1462 of the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Any plantings in the right -of -way of York Avenue must meet the requirements of Hennepin County. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 15 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 7. Sustainable design.,principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10 %. 8. All signage for the site must meet the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District regulations. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014; including that all public utility easements shall be dedicated to the City.' 10. At the time of building permit application, compliance with all of the .conditions outlined in the chief building .official's memo dated March 27, 2014. 11. Continue to work with Hennepin County to.secure a left turn in lane from . south bound York Avenue. 12. Approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding consideration of R =1 property within a PUD, prior to final rezoning. 13. .Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14. Metropolitan .Council approval of the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density. PUD Ordinance Recommend the City Council adopt the Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD -6. Zoning District. Deadline for a city decision: July 1, 2014 ME 7 �• I Interactive Property maps Map r. I .. I 1 J, i I SGUTHDALE DR I ! I i I 1 w s -._- ... 1 I I I_ ! ! I Parcel 29.028 -24 -31 -0003 ID: Owner Nha Birmingham Llc Et Al Name: Parcel 6725 York Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial- Preferred Type: Home- Non - Homestead stead: Parcel 3.33 acres Area: 145,096 sq ft -._- ... 1 I I I_ ! ! i i I I ! i_.... - -. . I i I w . I.-. Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 8/21/2013 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A 7 DA- Green! 6725 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 M1 Owner /Taxpayer Nha Birmingham Llc Owner: Et AI Taxpayer: i 14 t • + y 1 CAP .I Ra• , eA� —R School Dist: 280 i, Sewer Dist: •}b } '�' �(' Interactive. ...... __.._.._ ........ ._.__-.--- --- ---. __..._._.______._.___._.____�_� 1.6.725- Y ®rk Avenue, Edina Maps W7--- 3.33 acres. I' I ,— -9 „Y '• 3'. Find a PID or an address on the map Welcome ' I -- - - - - -- - - -' _ r _ � , • � .. � Results i�,- 'Parcel a _':A` Neighborhood.' Street 'Pig PI ®: 290224310 ® ®3�.__. 6725 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 M1 Owner /Taxpayer Nha Birmingham Llc Owner: Et AI Taxpayer: i 14 t • + y 1 CAP .I Ra• , eA� —R Parcel Area. 09 145,6 s p ft ,09 . Legend ' Measure 0 u. IL 20I�� A 9- A Vc .,. L School Dist: 280 i, Sewer Dist: •}b } '�' �(' ,e ,. Watershed Dist: 1 Parcel W7--- 3.33 acres. I' I ,— -9 „Y '• 3'. Parcel Area. 09 145,6 s p ft ,09 . Legend ' Measure 0 u. IL 20I�� A 9- A Vc .,. L Sa dot 41 -04 ;-;top R .4,ftc E S -,x 01 @ -- - - -- - - -- - -- ...for living,.learning, raising families & doing business 2008 C ornpre- Viensive Plan y Figure 4.3 49�1M City of Edina Future Land Use Plan ' '± 2008 Comprehensive P an Update Data Source. URS F -u— Li--] 0 0.5 Mrles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design �� 4 -25 ,V(, WILSON RD 8 EDEN AVE DE GRANDVIEW DETAIL �1 ` CAHILL RD & 707H DETAIL � 7 �P 4P ®11111 Ills ��_ � V � L/ LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES 1 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 304 1 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 LENNAMIC° FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVE 6725 YORK AVENUE SOUTH, EDINA, MN 55435 Monday, May 12`h, 2014 Team DEVELOPER: LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES, LLC (LMC) Lennar Corporation (NYSE: LEN) is a Miami -based homebuilder founded in 1954, with a market capitalization of over $8.6 billion. It has offices in 33 markets and 16 states, and employs approximately 5,750 associates nationwide. In mid -2011, Lennar created Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC (LMC), a company that specializes in the development, management, construction, and ownership of Class A multifamily communities across the nation. LMC's core vision is to work in top tier cities with top tier architects to create luxury condominium quality rental communities. Since its founding, LMC has attracted an outstanding team of seasoned professionals, has purchased 12 sites and contracted for 16 more. Eleven projects are under construction and the company has plans to start 20 more projects in 2014. LMC's pipeline includes over 16,000 units and $3.9 billion in total development cost. Beyond the numbers, LMC is led by professionals that are passionate about creating vibrant communities that positively impact not only the residents, but also the surrounding communities that we become an integral part of. ARCHITECT: ELNESS SWENSON GRAHAM ARCHITECTS (ESG) Since our founding in 1970, Elness Swenson Graham (ESG) Architects has helped our clients create environments for business, community and leisure. In doing so, we have gained the experience and ability to deliver high quality designs for many building types. But this alone is not enough to achieve our mission. The essence of ESG is more than just architecture and buildings. Throughout our entire time, our commitment to enriching our built environment has remained steadfast. It's a commitment that drives us to go beyond the expected to deliver the superior, the timeless, the memorable and the unique; to create environments that capture the human spirit and uplift our lives. This is what we do best. We strive to combine our clients' needs and stewardship for the environment with our knowledge of buildings, markets and culture to deliver uplifting and forward - looking design solutions. The experience derived from our work allows us to offer each client a great breadth of informed and integrated services. We bring holistic solutions to complex problems. We create truly unique environments that enhance our communities and help our clients successfully pursue their goals in the development and construction industries. ESG is committed to creating communities that are both memorable and practical. We breathe life and vitality into our new urban environments. For generations outside our core cities, our society has created single purpose neighborhoods that isolate us from one another and separate us from our workplaces and shopping marts. In so doing, we have placed incredible strains on our infrastructure and resources. Today we want more. We want to build real communities and promote stewardship for our land. We want to live close to our workplaces and close to others. We want to eat out more, to walk to shops, to sit outside in a pleasant, vibrant, safe environment made up of diverse buildings, diverse people, and great public places. 2014.05.12 EDINA PROJECT NARRATIVE PAGE 1 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES 1 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 304 1 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 Staying ahead of the market - Residential Communities and Community Planning Whether it is on a single site or a large parcel, multi - family residential development has long been a large part of our built environment. Housing is a forceful driver of new development and will remain so as long as our population continues to grow. But our lifestyles evolve and our sensibilities toward land development change. This creates new demands for new residential paradigms. Many people are moving back to the city in large numbers. They wish to live in walkable communities. They now seek vital, 24 hour neighborhoods where they can find the amenities and conveniences of a more urban lifestyle. By advocating for New Urban principles, our Residential Studio has propelled ESG to regional and national prominence. Our portfolio of completed work illustrates these principles and highlights the value that high quality design brings to reshaping our neighborhoods and cities. Project Purpose and, Vision The purpose and vision for this multifamily development in Edina is to create a high -end luxury rental community with complimentary retail. This complimentary high -end retail tenant(s) (such as a high end restaurant, food service, health club, or other community based retail tenant(s)) will flourish with the other shopping opportunities along York Avenue while also adding an incredible lifestyle value to the residents of the building. This development will give Edina residents a wonderful living option as they downsize, retire, move, etc. while still staying in the community they love. The project will also establish a better utilization for the wickes furniture site and eliminate the existing dated structure. We strongly believe that this project will become a catalyst for future redevelopment opportunities for other properties going North along York Avenue. The strong pedestrian connection and community terraces will dramatically enhance the walkability of this area with connection into and throughout the site. Special attention has been paid toward the building materials and massing to properly fit within this community; creating a place that is " Pure Edina" by incorporating elements from the surrounding areas such as the limestone that is on City Hall and other Edina structures. Architectural Description The architectural design and massing of this project is based on guidance from urban design and architectural design principles developed in the City of Edina's land use plans and timeless city building strategies. The design and massing creates a new fabric and a better street definition along York and Xerxes Avenues. A large opening in the building mass breaks up the south facade and allows for both increased solar penetration and a view enriching vegetative courtyard. The architectural expression and materials of this project will incorporate contemporary materials and facade composition. The building materials will feature a transparent glass storefront, masonry, and "Edina" limestone at the street level, above which will float a traditionally inspired composition of masonry, architectural metal, and large amounts of glass. Special attention has been paid toward proper setbacks, material usage, landscaping, and privacy along Xerxes Avenue where our development is adjacent to the single family residential community. Building design details include a dark, grounding two -story podium, segmented to reflect the scale of the homes across the street, an active street level with walk -up units, expressed with a front porch entry design, the creation of three -story bays to create plane changes and additional stepping in the facade, and color and material changes reducing the appearance of height. 2014.05.12 EDINA PROJECT NARRATIVE PAGE 2 P LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES 1 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 304 1 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 Streetscape and Public Realm The design of this development features streetscape improvements including new pavement, street trees, and lighting. The groundscape will feature green landscape elements, high quality pavement, pedestrian gathering and sitting areas, and decorative lighting. The sidewalks will wrap the entire site allowing neighboring properties a through -way access from York Avenue to Xerxes. This pedestrian connection will also create a one -third mile walking path around the site as a safe walking path for residences and the community. Distinct nodes will be linked to these sidewalks as community terraces. These nodes will both highlight the residential entrance and commercial tenant on each side of the facade facing York Avenue. Safety of pedestrians walking along York will be improved with a landscaped buffer and increased sidewalk width. Green and Sustainable Features The key sustainability strategy for this project is to create an urban mixed -use, pedestrian friendly community that allows residents to live, work, and play without dependence on daily automobile usage. The mixed use development will include a complimentary retail tenant to the residential tenants. The development team is committed to the sustainable design principles reflected in the City's comprehensive plan. Our sustainable design mission is to promote livable communities through the use of energy efficient systems, green building practices, reduced dependency on automobiles, creative density, high quality pedestrian and bicycle public realm, and the preservation of natural resources. The project will feature a series of green elements including green construction practices, materials specification, thermal high- efficiency windows and exterior envelope, and numerous permeable planted green spaces both on the site as well as on the amenity level roof. 2014.05.12 EDINA PROJECT NARRATIVE PAGE 3 A-T 6725 YORK AVENUE PROJECT ADDRESS: 6725 York Ave S Edina, MN UNIT MIX & SQUARE FOOTAGES PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX Q u- swiuia; Cmua oac cm..N.ssi Yv A.Tnldn; .s .sue.. ioeo v ccmaa. +era, NO.em, cdnnM S.m.w veauwp�!�u es�.»c D.ro. r.d...mN.. Nn:a�'c�Na, M+sswi 61i2]Ita9]6 Cava:.Nw Synryarya2v rp S.iUnM1C 5 �eSOUBn Sinn SV �SdN ESO ur 112 Ca.Ytlbu iamr Pmmd�. Doigas D��r,,,, Coman.Kin Smnn svrtErNUeen 65UED iDH N98iBlCEOKY • R54E0 WNCONSTRUCIpN ('i sKf N11E "� 1 ii� 6725 YORK AVE. li ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 0 S/1212014 «T1 .1 6725 YORK AVE. . ........ ... ............ ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1 212014 AO.2 ��, q I I� ,, Irk Itr rt. JJ Now IMF ��� IN. Nil lommorwow— jr Op M 1! q IN 'All R il IN H .41 7-1 Ka--M" �me-.L - III- u PiAt. III PIl rig hill, ow IL milli! Em ft IN a Low WL: we I in, 0- in R, El k1r- tt 4- H gill I M W9 11 vim e -JI, 71 VA H 1711 aim -III J I 1 1 11 M 4- H gill I M W9 11 vim e '. G um e � m re, 91 0 E) o s �.� a e � a "`^"~"»"^,^ ^—~ .... ...... ~—......... ~ --------- ---~---- ----~--- ISSUED FOR nsrsnsmos ONLY worFOn uowornuormw CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL ' �mi oil FIT I■! Me I'1dIN pFi!■ ■ ■■ a 11 in IN 11 ■! IN on ■i ■! I! ni on OR IN _ �■! �u �1! ®1! a �■n ■ ■■ ■■ 11 in u n ■! p! ■■ ■i ■! 1! q ■■ on 1! ■! m �IN ®IN a !■� o , ■■ ■■ !1 is 11 11 ■! li! no ■1 ■! 1! u1 :: on in Emig MINER or�... - -- INN 11 1 � ■ on •• 11 IN !MR • ■• •• !I IN !■ . ■. 0� !1 1! !■ 1 on e No 11 IN is • in !• !I 1! is l lll!lM%cr IN is .. uu s ■■ - -- INN 11 1 � ■ on •• 11 IN !MR • ■• •• !I IN !■ . ■. 0� !1 1! !■ 1 on e No 11 IN is • in !• !I 1! is 10.,011 ■N NI .n NI is 1 an'! !I 11! !1 is '1 ■ i s` ■ ■ ON IN IN !11 !1 IS 1711■�■1■�■■■■IIl�ggq�qqq����IR ■� n�Bi 1 ■ ■ ■11 ■II�T, -- j offs ■1 l I■ iN N n NI o. y !� s ■■ s .. Isla", . !1 I!" I all 111 11 in !I !M H n Iffingrilil on !II N ■. I! l! u! NI ! n IN No ■l pq 11 NO n 10.,011 ■N NI .n NI is 1 an'! !I 11! !1 is '1 ■ i s` ■ ■ ON IN IN !11 !1 IS 1711■�■1■�■■■■IIl�ggq�qqq����IR ■� n�Bi 1 ■ ■ ■11 ■II�T, -- j offs ■1 l l0 1! it Mai ■n NI 1. I! •• !■ i in Iu ! !1 ON I IN F F� !U i in u n n IN r ■q N!II�IN ®rNI, ■. ■ #01 1! 1_ F! !■ ! !■ m ! !! ■! 1 1! o on !II N N■ !! ! !1 ON r! � !1 1! N T T T 'ZF- .0 0 H 1! H 1! :NHERIM. Lin 1! !p 1! MR I-P T c c ii 1• U 91 1! H H1 1! 1! HI 1! 1! HI 0 0 0 0 an oil 11 !1 IN 111 1! H! on ON No No is III on ON on No 11 !1 IN 11 E! d! on all ME ME in III No on m 1! !IN! 1! CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05112/2014 A 3.4 672S YORK AVE. esc LL W 11WERALMIMULAILLM11111 nn ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 an oil 11 !1 IN 111 1! H! on ON No No is III on ON on No 11 !1 IN 11 E! d! on all ME ME in III No on m 1! !IN! 1! CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05112/2014 A 3.4 ® R CD — — 5 "D AT, O — — FIE- 7 0 DEMOMHED q XCIE- — R-C) . � D-0— ..E. N— E... it N L TEETI BIIJ ORPROhD MF N_ BEE _ F 4- i Fl I li A/ P-7 0.----p -r- 4 _T_ r',7,7,— K 2-_ ma Ir �F r Ih�, 7'. r l Ix _7 �-ft 14. I TE N: 2 lol %4,a ZZ17 47z".Z. (j., I. d p- d .d d 1. F\ REMOVE EXISTING SgE PAVEMENT, SITE CONCRETE. AND CURB AND GUTrER A NDONI AND REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILffY SEE LANDSGPE PUNS FOR TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRMPE W.2%,17N 1 IT ./v --N INLET PROTECTION i SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND ClA FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 N., 213506 NM MR 6)25 TORX AVE. DEMOLITION ANO EROSION CONTROL PLAN IF, cCNCRY M.- N- I—ER E of wom — BE CEORDI—ED SID 1. I D -R. OCCURS E. r r F 4- i Fl I li A/ P-7 0.----p -r- 4 _T_ r',7,7,— K 2-_ ma Ir �F r Ih�, 7'. r l Ix _7 �-ft 14. I TE N: 2 lol %4,a ZZ17 47z".Z. (j., I. d p- d .d d 1. F\ REMOVE EXISTING SgE PAVEMENT, SITE CONCRETE. AND CURB AND GUTrER A NDONI AND REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILffY SEE LANDSGPE PUNS FOR TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRMPE W.2%,17N 1 IT ./v --N INLET PROTECTION i SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND ClA FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 N., 213506 NM MR 6)25 TORX AVE. DEMOLITION ANO EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 U) LLJ Z) z LLI O 0 U) w :3 z LLI X Ir w X 6725 YORK AVE. I-, - w ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ......... . 1111 AO.1 i coon c�c - D013FEL�nu� SOD m,RAPRr RETURNS oAruur lel mormER ELM � Y O s 3 J Il <I STELLA O'OROO•riILLW� IA0I BLONDE AMBITIIXI BLVE GRAMA — Ix<IFwEOANCE DOG (l)REOSUNSETMARE /-131 �O AM9ET wRE I �n�BNH,ERML ONEVSUCKLE _ a „AI "'Ell OnEnOOUBT 1 1 1 nONEYSUCMI ___ bOROOAYULLV ___- `VIREPoIL � EnOL115! 1101 BU XONEYSUGNLE� I � i It VK 40 da O� iio I 1 � 00 ea ao eo� �O`.aRjA-rQ017Ri��°iy��so Ae � oe oo'� �wOOvl� :c °bi�lo °o)��w��j"T •• �47L< I. �ti�° I{ OTO; OOl90►ONL °i- ;40016`eO�O�C�O�'�O �•• I•_•.yna +0°ae>i0 OS.0100�0190�o,O�il.4r \rOl��� a ° °000:4 IIE•,O° eeE 1 I I 1 7 II I- I I III t I I - II l I I' 1I ilci3 ��=_{C ooeee�ooeee 'Oee_e_e_e_O:eeoorQ_ ^� pa, 00,,.:, aree..p-�0',OY'.00l.000j OTOC•OOe IN °•e =a'sd'DOOioo4�oe;.esiy�o ,eo °aoiee gun F.asT"^mER REED GRASS IN m��Ill a cant C0.0R HOOF ,( OOnCRETE SBEWxH 1 • I RErURnS aAnulr 15e'SWIiOWl MGM54 \ ` � \ ' /\• �. 19 $LGTCH PINE .WNMn BIAEE MARE / ` (12)FIR— EOOGMOa 17)AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE AIrtUMNOLA2EMAPLE PLAN LEGEND wwwTESPIRE Bwa P6IFOAMFLONER ® N.I STELU aoROOArLaLr nBIFwEOw+ce oacwooD Ilxl -EOAncE OGGwooG tm FwEOArvw GOGw000 W51 MTIC f1RE OOGVA00 C IS SIRt• EYJSTINGTREESTOf✓ W-m ) CQ•'FAO15 BIRIB 00EUPb16 REE . T �, LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN per• tv 7a u 6725 YORK AVE. DA ONFMBERASSO TES •1 aM•H..HBNBLSmup �LI6i SSlxxllE.ep]6 p617�37f1x .BYNAiBIQIM1A ISSUED FOR REFERENCE .ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ALOwarG 2213SOG JS 15 6725 YORK AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN LA1.0 ti -- `VIREPoIL � EnOL115! 1101 BU XONEYSUGNLE� I � i It VK 40 da O� iio I 1 � 00 ea ao eo� �O`.aRjA-rQ017Ri��°iy��so Ae � oe oo'� �wOOvl� :c °bi�lo °o)��w��j"T •• �47L< I. �ti�° I{ OTO; OOl90►ONL °i- ;40016`eO�O�C�O�'�O �•• I•_•.yna +0°ae>i0 OS.0100�0190�o,O�il.4r \rOl��� a ° °000:4 IIE•,O° eeE 1 I I 1 7 II I- I I III t I I - II l I I' 1I ilci3 ��=_{C ooeee�ooeee 'Oee_e_e_e_O:eeoorQ_ ^� pa, 00,,.:, aree..p-�0',OY'.00l.000j OTOC•OOe IN °•e =a'sd'DOOioo4�oe;.esiy�o ,eo °aoiee gun F.asT"^mER REED GRASS IN m��Ill a cant C0.0R HOOF ,( OOnCRETE SBEWxH 1 • I RErURnS aAnulr 15e'SWIiOWl MGM54 \ ` � \ ' /\• �. 19 $LGTCH PINE .WNMn BIAEE MARE / ` (12)FIR— EOOGMOa 17)AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE AIrtUMNOLA2EMAPLE PLAN LEGEND wwwTESPIRE Bwa P6IFOAMFLONER ® N.I STELU aoROOArLaLr nBIFwEOw+ce oacwooD Ilxl -EOAncE OGGwooG tm FwEOArvw GOGw000 W51 MTIC f1RE OOGVA00 C IS SIRt• EYJSTINGTREESTOf✓ W-m ) CQ•'FAO15 BIRIB 00EUPb16 REE . T �, LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN per• tv 7a u 6725 YORK AVE. DA ONFMBERASSO TES •1 aM•H..HBNBLSmup �LI6i SSlxxllE.ep]6 p617�37f1x .BYNAiBIQIM1A ISSUED FOR REFERENCE .ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ALOwarG 2213SOG JS 15 6725 YORK AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN LA1.0 GENERAL NOTES I. c4nrRACraR SlwL wsw:ci lHE SITE NEBE000EPAILLVA LNTx EASTBYDCaomaxs REIATwGTo , HE tM, URE NUI StaE a YNRK L OORRICIOESHN1VWYw .WUffiDSRRQTOTHEATIENTENaiIf LWDSCIPEAAUInER 0.5O>EPNWESYAODIWTCOtrRO16E- OR n Of1NELAYOUT. 1 CGYMKDN- ASSURECOSiMJ10ELMN -BLBfa - REGLL.IrRWS40KN@JGTHE NtlIXAMJ"'RER LS SUI 1. COOPNnGE SXIiI PROIECf EASTHG ROAOL OJ184GVDDLt TR-k TREES. W. AIA SITE _EI£SQrtS OURRO LOx51gILllO1 oPFMnO6 -TO SNE SHILL BE LEPMRp AI XO AOOR W AL COST 10 THE ON6A S - O"C'mE VERFY IUGWEM IJE ABOVE GRNELIRIfE9 OE THE NEa35WYNWrECR0111« sNEBFEOE cO6TINOIIO, BEGPp yAMWHIT aEAruxcEt fl OWIRAOIOE SNNl COa0P1AlE nE RUSES afI1vS11Wrn «INORINiIxG WST. -. N1TH OIIFA C «1 MCiOLS YrLH Wi0 ON SI1F. T, INaRGRCOmuRnIE35M41 BE WS1ALlEDSOTHMLTREHCHES DDHOi CUT iH3WGH ROOT SYL FECEMOTREESTOREMW L EASING -TOUtq iRALS VEGETAIEM. OA04 TER MD OTHER ELE TS AREB SEOUPOI lION 6ViAE0r0 fHE L4USLAPEIR AEIECf BYOTNEIL4COYI 1VEAFY OSCREPANC[S EGOS f0 WNSTRIICnON MD A9RY LNIDSWPE MWtE" IECT 0' SAYE 9. NCRQOrt4IJE VERRC4 NlGMIFMaw1a05E0NA116 . iRIL1 O0.R0IAWY5 TAE enmR TO HEIOADAHSnFtJr RE- TO iOLOVIDEDtOPoGNMKCDIIIRIOC NO TONPWag wEE1EY1N4IIE GRYDNG IXWGESNIUGVENI NEGNDES NLLSIBE IPINOVFD BY TIE 1umsGVE NwrtECT PRa rDwREr1ENrA1WN IS COIAMRORSMNI REVLW THE SAE Fa -ENCES N EIE LAIRIA•NSNNLXRL«IMEwiNELY ARFECr PIIRI ESrW GRR.BURNVNORYJNWR1Y. lRAE501ARE SREf001t1'Ii3 SNMI BE BR W tlR TO TxE AT-O. a 111E LMOSONE AROETECI NE «i0 BE47NN0 a -0L 11. CU'TIMOItlE WRFSPONSII iORWGONGNIATEWWCE LORD WSTNIEONATFRIIL5W11L1NE SLSHSLANR4 COWEIIOn .REPILiaACTSaBI- OFT aOYNGEN NAY- PRIONro SUBSTANnKCRYREINN SHALL BE TXE PESPOVSELITYan1E UJIWCAPE LIWTRACTOL IL EASING }PEES OR MGRFICNO SHRUB WMG3 FOIRE OR SITE SILLLL BE NLOIEORD MD SMED OAES5 NOTED TO BE RENG.ID aAREL -TED W IN IAELIOBE GR- OIESnO19REGNtlNG EASING PL.sJR NAIEA45NNL BE BROIGIi 10THE AitEMIG�anE WESC4f NKSwECTPRER iOREWVN_ tl EASrMG11EE5TOREI-L UB- WEGIlO16LM65E JFEMOORR.SXNLOEFEARn .D RAIIEp TO -- OEAO NODD. DW M4D.W 0 RB®YG BHLW OEL I CI «.-I RE- SUB- ANINIE ABOUE5TNR- SUBUrN1R4COP;ETHO1 NSPECnW OF WmSGPF.VLIBHIEB6PPRlEXTSwdGiiO SUBWi1WG1P11L PAY I✓EgEST. IS. cDrmwx «wuPRPNEAHDSI@afREPROgRtBLE ASfiutr DrMNNClslauxoscwE -OK-WMY AND SREOPIfl 'DEJ3NTSfPONOO@LEAtl16t«SnBICTRN NSIAWTIOTJM PROR TO SUBSTM LCOEiEfIG1 Ifl S.-M PLAN tlMN'ND TN RRa➢ENCE- SCxEOLES F O5LiEPIRCE3WOVNrt11F5 EAST. SPEONGROIS AND OETILR NNE PIECEC a -NOTE£ GRADING NOTES 1. GRAOWG UNITS ARE DEFNED AS THE JIWCNRE a PROPOSED GMDE ICH E-O GRADE UNLESS -EDOIE E. 2 ORFpp.- BAHDLWFSa WONSNOW MPI/A ARE OrIYMPRDWMIE MON.Sx BE AOJUSTEO IN FRLD BY LNOSCWE ARfJ11EC1. L OUTSEE a THESE lPL15 'Al BE DONE AT -E COIRRKTORS ESPE6E UNLESS -ED BYLNOSwF£ARCNRLi «OINFA W YAAIN4 L FUUNr AS NEUESSIRVTO PRO.4IEA IYMN'JOb OR ADE EVAY FROM BIMJGS NITHOBIDNSOF corsTRl2n« Aw AIWITEW GRILE BETNEEI -ORS N AREAS TO BE GRADED U SS NOrEO OTHEWAS¢ L EEYAn«LFSXIXNPREFN91EOFlEVA1CWi SPO ELEVNIDNR iNEREaDEnCE O.ER cartaR£ cONIpKfOR SHNL COMACf PUHIO V TETE9 FOR LOwn «a UNOEROIOSO NAES, C16LE5. CG1ON£P@E3, NANX0.ES Vl. L4E5a0r1EA0UWEDSTRICTURESEEFaEOIGGWG. VN0.SCAPE CO-TORS- PEPN R OR RERACE THE MOUE M OANAGED OURW G cONSnNCOO1 AT HO ADOTI ON4 CG51101HE DYA4R I COITRACTORSXN1 PNOVla RiaERFAQSIDNCON1R0.1IFl0 .YiE0A5 REOARFA1pw5aE lHAi EROEOn 3- TTOMABS- 16OR-ECNLSPEGr1 -1- L PRPJEETEW YVRY0O- GFawTCHBMLYSA IlOEBLM4ER9ED4RA@ COLREM-SEEOut SECFlEA RS. PLANTING NOTES I. xpwIRISNAl BENSTALIEDIMl WU1GPIIDIG If✓DCOISiRICiWx HASEDI COHETFDNf1E unEDLLTENEA 2 PRpPOSIDGWrt NATEAVL SXNl lAIwlTN1IX 11E CURRFMEOIIONanE INFRw SIANOWO F «rAwsEnr STOOL ANE zBL1. STREET IIQBOREVAROTTFFSSI Wi WGVI9Vrvpp41W LINhA MW! PH0.E PAVE05U3Aa. 1. PRaOSEDPUNTMAIEEWLSW4LBELOwTEDMDSTNED /.SSNONAOIRNLLMDSIJRE AROOEtt MJSTAWNDVESTNOWaI- MATERMLPWORTOOHGGMG S NDPLAHIAUTEAMISIIB5 TlORBW BEACCEPIEDUNIESSMwOp SGUNIEDBYIIE lMOSCME NGNEtt iOIIE COI1MOfa PRa TD THE 5UBM5510N a G0. L IDJIISTNEMS N LOwrEN OF RiaDSFD PUNT NATEWALB NAY BE RIEDED W F.O. -OS-S MOIOECT - BE IIOIIFOO PRER TO TOE-- a P -TS. PUJR WTER4910BENS ALIED PEA RINTNG OEIAI3. L LIEF NMPNN4 WiFAVL5H41 BE iN61YALLEDPLASIIt SXEElWOIPPIEOFlEW TRNtfVRE 10 FpLSI BAANIX V1A.W 91WINBNOED aCEUGLB THEESRAXIEDN THEFNLgUGiTOOaSBFR I AROREIELENRMR GAFlER- TURF NOTES SODIAE/SOSIIABFD0.ErOGR UG ESSNOTEDOnEANiSE L -ERE SW AIAA.- SURFACE£ FPINIED -OFS=BBE.O- SE- I•BE-SINFAOE EEVAnOI a 1RIL SLPB, DNB, ETG STEERATww 21 a Nd%LI4GE S'NNES.90DSHNl BE STMEDSECUHELY nE orl� ® :w sErnov m,AEOosAiwonRAxTWc rMLL« -OT PLAO M4IX SEE wAv EO4N46EE iLM _ I / _ CGRAPERGPONN lMIFJL49W1 _ `- I _ �iOpGT�NNNL0a5NTFL uuL 1• aERFx ixM Raor wLL {j- II - I_ n- _ IE sFiASrGasNEeonaJa mmlsPAasmIND � i0B]DNiN RNRWG SOI r2 \ SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING DETAILS SSETIIFO«GNRC- DFE$£GNGIHtlSI nog COYIRAGTa sxN1 NNV rux }REFS w" S WWACIFD RALIX IOBERACEO63- W[MK LvnlEmrDUSOO�G 414 v � PFAGD LMMIREF iRIW6Q6YIPDX "oP -SE RE41F➢-. SYLNE ToEn.w+mlc R5.1@a+mw:IracLVO E➢GIYDE. rolar rmximETRNL 11 RME 1HMES NRaOi -T ra a ROOT ONl Fp00rpAlE6NOTNSHE. RwLE SaNALEVU MNNERFRDMRDa Ivnt FxSrNAN Omwxmrp, w /-7'\ STEELEDGER [:R.•ET.1r .:11':_[,1,- R.TSfRlIE_= TI��[(,S[jj�s)'ils a LNYtR FIERGES iRtlJ ilE i W A% 6ETNNn LYB101 ROa I•INUEAMW IDL ' E� wDF Donor [QYENTa vApE£�SEE�IR�M1� OROOifl4LYBM90l CWPACTRINiNG 3GL t0E fERaNt OAl4laYOBf 1N ACLORIOTOASIY OIW 4tlAMLLElOSE -ITI ED KAi.FOGE iOBEGI110 TBEON Fw4NFOGWOE WfE SmxAS BEEry NR4CEFa WwY£ ��j:J♦�.iTR,A!lil^IEIy:I1N]�i ���Inii :I•:SYLl'/.YE3:T3:1- T]Eii� r �eT�['ff[�PiA�i� �. .js /mil 1N�lIE t4 aR00TP.Nl ROPE Na 111E fPOi / \: auunFmo�aeGR�inEJ _I ' � t� / r MMaP�BYnuaMEPrt I� r' WmemlFRSrNVnsu TFwmrrrtnFiErEPrESV]EsO ETI•TOF 3 ROOt fls1L ^"'� ^'� OR '�GNN WMTROa04LT 3T%q SrAaASHEauPEDPrRSnc "CWtl"ER�A�ELL� VIr�Gf 1 TREPUWTING DETAIL E G�WYVGFAEl T,A ... ti,.....,.....,,. nE orl� ® :w sErnov m,AEOosAiwonRAxTWc rMLL« -OT PLAO M4IX SEE wAv EO4N46EE iLM _ I / _ CGRAPERGPONN lMIFJL49W1 _ `- I _ �iOpGT�NNNL0a5NTFL uuL 1• aERFx ixM Raor wLL {j- II - I_ n- _ IE sFiASrGasNEeonaJa mmlsPAasmIND � i0B]DNiN RNRWG SOI r2 \ SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING DETAILS SSETIIFO«GNRC- DFE$£GNGIHtlSI �IEI4 F ➢anW51FUA,IFA ri �t \;._J;' \• ��:::':-: ..;. "•: I - 11- I 414 v � `m ilt I. . SPEC s GRNE NO EDGE / �VN0:9•SFER•W _ 111 I•„I_ 11 LET T /-7'\ STEELEDGER [:R.•ET.1r .:11':_[,1,- R.TSfRlIE_= TI��[(,S[jj�s)'ils 1 NE SGLFa �srtzr.IVISE4nm mAlEnraEElERmaunwc ft 1u�WRDOTSNN+OL005Fry B SEBATOB RF1e w suRFYSEEBA•EBOraBa ioWmNi sat umlwsmsLmuDE /-4 1 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL t H �Ea �l4lrIJ ,R1:16TJi7 ✓..7�I.R.71R'LS.LVP�i V- ibYB11��iId:�F¶i[d1 .ilIN:IIY•Plq:lm �t'��].T.7T117:rtl4! -[ III[ bFLSiO. �A'7^ �1II7�ik7i? 1��T.S1F?fiClf #iln[d:lilftl77:1 �< 7�IIJ7r; �ir.G;'rirrF:aFi- rF^�mR1LF.}sn, SFr na- 1:1•ikY+:l[��:n.:71FFTI #�i[>1CfiRaf7a:1 �OfTAEPI'Fi3iy�� ikY?! I��1L�EiG[LI�#iL_CF7:iifi.�73:7 �t��'i N#X UIITN. i-[ ATA^+ AL7# 1^' �' I��ikYt ]I��:fl•F'I:CdP�it3Rd.IllyPltl:� Ll�il•IrnTS; r. �. rI��n' rErt^ TrnY -cr�'a_sA'-r +. +I��n�Frr;ralajL rrinn.la:� �i3Ul�!:lil[i]C!aH�HLi �sai� y[ EPA[! II: I: IY511: I; r11- �yT. Rlr_^. I(. r'�iLll:[tlL��il �S11�+¢ �. T,yT�iZY.NIi[FiRH!:iA�:TEiFrYR� +J:i11�F7L_�a:L• rl�� _�i�[i.1:1 I�fi�i]r:TST,rriT7A^TF:: :IN E:n:llY'1{'- [:R.•ET.1r .:11':_[,1,- R.TSfRlIE_= TI��[(,S[jj�s)'ils iLYEfd��S�.LIS4T�Q� ' E� ��j:J♦�.iTR,A!lil^IEIy:I1N]�i ���Inii :I•:SYLl'/.YE3:T3:1- T]Eii� �eT�['ff[�PiA�i� �. .js •' FiiLTi7dlUll,� �t31\ SN:ItxI:I;Ari;Ll11! �L? E7•;:;•'.. �Ijy( PUTu +- tll;[ys�31!•R +]fN].f:i91.,1� �t•'.171LIi11:a��L[1i3113�11rv' u�FT• �' L'. GiIF�iLY :[��ti +Ht'r�Liys+a:f:E:c:� ���71�14: iL4�& ?1NFClPIDiN :nI.E�IR[[*rF�l:.�L7Se'u, -� f I[:ul��_ �t'll♦1:I1:FI.TNIF:HLY:Ia DI: IB49q:A' i111L' �[:FTT.'ta:a:T.f.1:T:T[�- [j[iR: �Illl>[F:901f;11[1J20:YL15. /1 ]111[ - mom [i' y F,.�y.--yT iils•]•,i�'. .�- �ffTE([1N[Nf.N1��- - �Li1CLt1'171LiG1ii' ill[ ��.1: li�w .-- -1+Tn:G?+.aHF:c•i��'iM0;1�� E}7[I:IF'.E:IrIF11:I:1'BSHIlN51E'20:�\Hi.7iiE[[T:�RLi{--fTUNNFH�- �fE�FVUR:tl9:11:LR:VJFY9'`W' I :IF�[ErcTml'XS1R.I[F>��fi[SSII�- �Ei� [ORm.:[EIIRtA'rnJt.'!TyY.LT SCHEDULE 6725 YORK AVE. EB- NN .ImespeY��wmm �m� fH13 DWONFARBEPASSOCIATES WI ]b ASNx MVI SLe 110 Hs.vIPUA un sslN .NR nB�i LF :�ouB ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 REYWONS OesFNWlm Oue 21350115 IS JS 6725 YORK AVE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 6 DETAILS LA1.1 2 5 O u1 w n Z w Y Q O } d 5725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1212014 A0.1 f ,!:U.p Y 1 i3a OVER 16B' BETW EEN BUILDING FACADES 132'- 0• BETWEEN BUILDING AND PROPERTY LINE 1 <1' -6' LU J Q LLI 0 a I I I— III —III =1 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I =i I I SECTION THROUGH XERXES AVENUE I i LU a o 4r I I I I I 4T-r -NEW SETBACK (FINAL PLAN )EVT. APPROVAL) L —n 1 3T -r- PREVIOUS SETBACK (PRELIMINARY APPROVAL) I I - 0• - ORIGINAL SETBACK (SK ETCH PIAN REVIEW) I I I I 1 I _ I I'� I { I I I I I �I I I I I I i I i I L _ 1 UI II I i —_LL I LU J Q LLI 0 a I I I— III —III =1 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I =i I I SECTION THROUGH XERXES AVENUE I i LU Z QI n W W Z X I � WI U. UJ W LU d 0 zl Cc EL ¢I LU UI U I I ------ . ..... ...... ..... .......... T T T T ~ ____ ______ -------- ...... ... ..... ... ......... ............ r�— -- -- -- -- —+�� '--' . . . . _ '--'--'--� - ^.,.'..~. "°^` ,"ma""°*wr` | �N.APPRO�`A | _ '--'--'—�� -- -- _�� -- -- —��/ .. ........... tl I AA ISSUED FOR -- -- -- --`�/ nsrsnswos NOT FOR oowmnucnow . . . . _ '--'--'--� - ^.,.'..~. "°^` ,"ma""°*wr` | �N.APPRO�`A | _ '--'--'—�� -- -- _�� -- -- —��/ .. ........... tl I AA 10 11 12 13 ld 15 .*. � i i LOTT FLC 6725 YORK AVE. CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ... ......... . I I A Al a ........ ... .. ... ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ... ......... . I I A Al a IT T T T T T T - T T ? T T 7 T 6725 YORK AVE. eSG CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 Ch-k Al Ob "n`,"""^.^ �.... ...... .......... � Lil --------- ---~---- ��� 1-1, 1 A I Do. TT I a ]-I Q-1- 0 ISSUED FOR Ear" -77 nsrsnswcs ONLY worron Hill cowornucnow HIR DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL Ila -1 co �1 �= ^^ � � t60TV FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL I giamMut CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1 Z/201 4 "IT" ILI" 1111 - L1111 .... T L_L� Al.la i ... . ....... ..... . .......... I-,.: V.1.1.11-1,1=11,11.11,11 ---------------- . .......... .. .... CIO 'cro. -T c i -: UP ISSUED FOR REFERENCE CIO ONLY M JQ I, I NOT FOR F 41- 1 - I :E - - - - - CONSTRUCTION t60TV FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL I giamMut CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1 Z/201 4 "IT" ILI" 1111 - L1111 .... T L_L� Al.la E-4 1 10 II 12 13 lla7 IS sou714 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 6725 YORK AVE. esc CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OSI 12/ZO14 A I ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OSI 12/ZO14 A I :01 If T II T T T 'T T T 7 11 7 T 7 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 6725 YORK AVE. esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL 1). EV ELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/1212014 ... ......... . a 6725 YORK AVE. I CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLA M APPROVAL 05/12/2014 CIG -T. .1 1— 111111 Al .2a m .... ...... ..... - - - ------- .. ........ ... .•.... .......... lQl........ ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLA M APPROVAL 05/12/2014 CIG -T. .1 1— 111111 Al .2a fill no" 81. CITY OF EDINA FINAL PLAN APPROVAL 05/12120 14 Al .2b —.... ...... .......... _ '----- ---'----- � ~ ~~~_ ISSUED FOR nspsnsmus ONLY worron __ _/D cownrnunnow CITY OF EDINA FINAL PLAN APPROVAL 05/12120 14 Al .2b T T Ul T - - - .. 2- c :TE 71' I�M ,EMTy 7ERRACF. PUN -----<D K C0�?TARD PLAN 6725 YORK AVE. esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 Lm" COIRTIAll ILAII Al .2c 191A OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3.5 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/ 12/2014 ... ......... . A1.3 mil NOr FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3-5 17 16 15 6725 YORK AVE. m .. . .......... SOWL-01 ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION W, mil NOr FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3-5 17 16 15 6725 YORK AVE. m .. . .......... SOWL-01 CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ........ ...... .. .ORTH FLOO. FLAI - Lf- Al .3a ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 ........ ...... .. .ORTH FLOO. FLAI - Lf- Al .3a .... ..... .... :-, A @ EM FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 7- 5 FLOOR - - - - - - - - - - - C_v 4:&_ REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ------ - ---- DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PLAN OS/12/2014 LT I__________ I I i ------ ------ ------- ---------- -Sit L da� ------ _q.F_LT 00. _T_ _7 - - - - -- - 7 pnr,� L I. Z @ EM FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 7- 5 FLOOR ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PLAN OS/12/2014 @ EM FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 7- 5 FLOOR II - - - - - - - - - - -- K - - - - - - - - - - --- OVERALL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 6 0 6725 YORK AVE. esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05 /12/2014 Lh� =L rLOOt PLI. A 1 .6 --------- -------- ----------------------- --------------- - ----- ---- ----------- -------------- - ------------------- - ------- ----------- - --------- ----- ...... .... . ...... 6725 YORK AVE. w ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLA M APPROVAL .cw5. 121201 4 —T. FLOOR PLIN - LEILL . Al .6a 'F4 LW - -ET ----------- ----------- 1. 6725 YORK AVE. w ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLA M APPROVAL .cw5. 121201 4 —T. FLOOR PLIN - LEILL . Al .6a 6725 YORK AVE. I I 1 I I I L_ ' � I .----- i- -I'-- 1 -- - '- --- +---- -'�"-- - --�--- I - -I' a` _'7 _ •^�- - -- 1 -- --�-- -- - +- --- E. -� --- -_, ---- REFERENCE ONLY t !r° NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - - - -- - 1 1 -- - - - 1 - - -�- -- --- 1 - -- - -- I -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - -• - - - --0 4-1-aF � I +- - I I ,. ' I v� d I I I I _ Jr �••+ _T_— _— _T_ —_ —_T_ _--_ —_ _ —I I I - I CITY OF EDINA FINAL I I I DEVELOPMENT II I i 1 d�� I - PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/2014 I�� I I U �¢X' > 1 I V I I I _._.. II I I I I I I I I 1 I - I cal SOD,N FLOOR PLAN. LEVEL! um aoo. rux -[[vn- Al .6b W J 5725 YORK AVE. noon nano�au xm® ......x esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL i no52 12 0 1 4 "Wl 7 N 11MMOMMOPMUMMI '!rl�M MA I� -- I Ems= ■ I ICI I o ME u■ o INK I�. one oil ' II. � oe' �rvo• �/� I��r � � � �� �erio�� r � -ger� I� e;eauo'000 :ouo :oo :o:oo �I ed fr = u esc ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL i no52 12 0 1 4 "Wl 7 M! !! IN ?i q il I ON 1-� on ON q :777 L L Iz ■7130P.Mll N L IR .4 ■I r IM L! :M:�41L F F MEN lTmiMxMpZ!jIm!7m 1-1 u on I efs-it-i! p �l ;;-. 1! = p mos" ■ No so 11 ol in Lli ■ U L? ----------- ON q :777 L L Iz ■7130P.Mll N L IR .4 ■I Hon IN. M, '11 ..M WHEREIN 171 , f! !Ilom r Ll—ff m's !1 !1, mml Fr., I p I" q All, ■-! !I :2z �l 11 v mq !ml 11 rfF]jjr!lj P� I u �,q ffil I !�q �! I q I A (D EnTPD - EAST ELEVATION nEST CTYO - NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION er�E.§T�CTYD - WEST ELEVATION T T (� @ SE?�7D - SOUTH ELEVATON 6725 YORK AVE. ............... ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OS/1212014 IWA-1 A3.2 val IN --'--'--'--'—H' �� -- -- -- _7 --'--'-- --'—�' --'--'--'--�J�� --'--'--'-----' -1-1, Retail/A—lly Co- TIT T T T T T T TT T TIT T ' up" T T T T "`" YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY morpon cowornuormw CITY OF EDINA FINAL PLAN APPROVAL ()Sl 12120 14 • II �� I g n r�ry I- I GENERAL NOTES �, ;R j]�i I I Survey <•ereN,[e one b sic n•nn•Rin Ca «tY �..Ien01• Systmn �ti rr . Xi� �5�'�.3 £ •\,• I nnauns W . . m w a. Pn a rwtwo .m a b..e nn,r a •eanlana rwwr•a was ln.• n°I a•al. ° .� I I I UTILITY NOTES .cn m. I' n .u,wsol e�•v.�, b °s , m.ql'- ", -��" / •.I ' {. R6 3 t' .me • r 1�.. xol Yryn I }-� Y '•• '� 5.. : 1.) ..,amc fol uli sp'a6an eaewwo•,a arx.•2u. ��ea.ww�e ue ro.� •°�,�.: bCx. ��` ..\ n.wn K...re latltinq •,C,wlwn,'In. .wa I «.uon .r vnewywn° I «w•., °°nn.t «a•°se, �^ •sad °ne raaey aw 11- rm.. �. _. <' •w,b�.w �va \ Ie ��� .� a �.a,lal.e.�.1� . °..e..• ° », «m•rb 1.3 7 3 A. !li. ` -- - �'- rX• -- / I� z.) atn..• m.r•rwna . r .n cn . a .n,. °.. m,r , °w. V- 1y 41 /' 9 w• �N . °, _ - - - - =' n� •-r - tom•..• I °w _ -rimy. P,. , I: ^ a) s.n..ne.pwna . z tr 1 « °s «s >. °. nww.a a. er m°.. �. c , R�.. . .�, )'*, � i � �I -I� ,. �� ..., .., .° _ \� «^ • .� • � ,/ I I I I °�'^' ,. • `r; ., 5 ::^ 1i � S.a s.x ., / _ I ` �� . %�• .- . ` . ` �° S 7;li`,.L �' , \ I t$ I t�� ,�I, _L �• ~, y •..a...n .t. 1 «.n.o.sn e • -IN`b a -0r 0 0C2 . (B0 0 S-tx•5l. 6cx•1 w11 131261077. 14Oa4M4. I wawx, u34 w, Z -14O10n13• 6 6a• • oaea WE, s.) Cmat GA STATE CIO CALL ° 651 c) afa l, a nc pa rose •.w.. r'.i' •� r,1u .n •a_ - , a_, a `•• el_ QESCRIPIDNI OF•PROPERTY SURVEYED nn I aa!t• _�• _ _ __ _ __�� �__ - - �_ �, �r �.�u�Y- _ � I •P". � c�- (awc Ii � r. rw. its xl .p°Io a �° �"" :✓ ��' / �... I A�i S� NI I �I. I n °a . -d vloll .,.« I 6N. n .,..� ° �a.a» « Iona s.. »�naaix ate• w.,°=i it °a « A / gl g i 3 I� ' " I •�..e.•. .,., ..> as . �I - A I r1 s °IS' a'o<x x •,.� u w ~. / • I� f ay = I i � � / / R.i.. v. . i i I a 1 I i i �Js- / / ...,1l ' f : `+• �'- •.... -• t c / '•F a I : I ..a I ^U.°w aau : . U;�a »I.°«. ,.,.., °. I.r. . I I�°:arn_ 'l1 : iI:M ; � rte ° s ". w . nI uwa ' o " i°."eu • ...e a :. so�`k e° un °°inacrub 'IT_'9 ,mmo'u"a�?a. I, "r .v 629 •`p$17' _s$ r -syaer wroBwu euln;e i X ) • ' q� _ it O -� ...� • / SM nW AKKV $a I ; I ._. ..y�± ��. �m.. �` � � � � _ m•' - h lc.nin.•I..f raw rror laxers17 O .. MC• F i I eve � � ,..� .� � � a > w.e, °z •, #: � y /II � • •i'/ I 4 i / •w '� �Y; i�ax z. � �� I6 � I % -aaPol. rlll. n. l�aa:so, a rt x: 'Ep•' .. •'a4 3 w j I a. � •�' � i'. I I ... �`'4_. � a aed ..a�. '� I �� i�..r..1..1 T.- I I yy. I Aro �. � �� / `_ °�h , }x .,() y ' E� �� l � � I ' • • ... -srr-.f . .' ` •" g••� .,y r �, � l %n� -�,•` , 4t- ••� °I b E° � I � 5 L I I I .l a elwx I. x .. T- ------- A.d�I W 6 N r54 Cily I. .A•665 "CIC . S TITLF CdAMITMFNT Y �, � m � gl I � _, ? � ' � r IY .�,\ 9 ` • „� �, ,' __ .�..... .,�, I m ` : nn.snn.K'.n r �•T w, j .,. I - �ti:. •t„ � a ..� � I � mow. r, '� �.• ..., qq � Iiv � i r' ...... / o i `i ��n —�. � • \r ,., I �' /,�r�r•� � ...• - :w.wT .•, . f..I ...ax..... !� I �" ^F.. \ "�'°.' °� -":". - - ,B•- eF. -.�!« - .:.''..6ro :.11 - - - -wF.- �!°' _ 6 li1.a 1. ""a'' - aebr «rbm; ttwl..`th., y ..o WEBS '^" ° -. -' - 1,-.. ....:- ,.- sr,-� T'^r • .. . % �'L.1 o,m °.a by war ocw..e c,na s,•..wr �nan tn. I �„ ,�• ,` � — bns 1 ib• 510t• 1 Ynnewlb IF rro - .tea �, .�• ,...,n, s ` :z u « .•a • d �^w., ^° ... �., - i I :! o.D.- u Ialn a, •f Fw...rr. xola ... Mt .°�..°. - "• -s . „ I n b . a • Q a _ >� .'�'.,�Jiym' �' } \ 1 st•soE wIO xrsvE we : _ w • ,ter _ _ _ _ _ - NB9 5723'W .n. 533.86 -- .,.... s f ,.w, I � i I N E..n.ra F. crown, F.LS Mhn. m. no. aeo •• I ^L s . c •• 1. V _ AaMtl LIa l...al 2/13/2014 0 l :_ /7, I BENCH MARKS (RM) NO V 0 29 LES�tl4 e.w °'•^+ e. ,..e, �«» . ... ••• 80UNO4RY, LOCA770N . TOPOGRAPHC 16T of PO<q ENCROACHMENTS e°r°6eulsl �I i:. .: r.• nydn ax A ». a. ^. x..wan nw�,r Xxvn° • ° ": °tln ~•...^' «w«. w. andUTIL77YSURVEYFOR: _BlF n...lin ae65x r „1 ""°°°°” �,; »,•• °i"" ° „^y, ,,,, LENIW MUL 77FAMIL YINVESTORS, LL wr z., .f ., as .•n. yp.I .•, EMIK UNNESOTA � n) nsl.....,1,° ee °.. .. a..t.. n r w ° •• , a.) . , ruo ewtwn Iw S- S ,neoen aauas• fy «e n.t w . .n'cmt w11. a a, a «x x. b s o n°sra°1n�wO.Y mx At »•. u .arant o1 ' �a'���, M o w 6o eu : ft LSANUD9NUHVDb7WE G SCALE N1 FEET ar r I fl 'V ® "'tr"...1..► TTI- Z- r RWiORCm CONCRETE NlDERGRWND STORAGE SYSfEY 91 N I I SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETA LS III I� i I 1 1 1 °i5ril I l �I I 1 6725 YORK AVE. w.� ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 11)506 6125 YOAk AM GRAENNG AND D"NAGE MN C1.1 I is I 1 ---------- 91 N I I SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETA LS III I� i I 1 1 1 °i5ril I l �I I 1 6725 YORK AVE. w.� ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 11)506 6125 YOAk AM GRAENNG AND D"NAGE MN C1.1 f�` J V_ N i7 I� e I i a I) r J �i F IY �I ! M j 1 I I!I { I SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. r?o�, ll;Es:.i I .iii.iiii ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 auaNrevrc: MI,w�. ulasnxE R. o..wr... a. 213506 N� MM 6225 VORR AVE. SEWERANSI WATER IITUTIES C1.2 4= I Z=Al . ........ JL 17— �7 1WIlall —1—=x ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP QUANTITIES' OEM ou M Goee`ConVM ban. 1p I.PEWKRA SURFACE (DI53UR EDf!!� PRE-IONSTRUCIgN DNOSIOPI AND SEI1MENf CONTROL DEVICE OPERATXW SCHMU REN � -A ZXT, t= SWPPP CONTACT INFORMATION AGENCY / POmom CONTACT PERSON PHONE NUMBERS El.... V. 6725 YORK AVE. Ma. MN ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL 05/12/14 NM MR 6725 YORK AVE. STORM—ER POLLUT N —PLAN C1.3 MARCH/SEPTEMBER MORNING 9AM MARCWSEPTEMBER NOON MARCH/SEPTEMBER EVENING 3PM JUNE MORNING 9AM . L r JUNE NOON .. �I IF L.' r [ In a �_e I` I L f: I I � ti MARCH/SEPTEMBER EVENING 3PM JUNE MORNING 9AM . L r JUNE NOON .. �I IF L.' r [ In a �_e f: I I � ti JUNE EVENING 3PM SHADOW STUDY r• 11 j. - ...._. DECEMBER MORNING 9AM ..... _ '1 6 r U r [ L a �_e f: 1- n DECEMBER NOON DECEMBER EVENING 3PM 1 ... I / F Lr I" I, ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ,17 � E, KA " 0 '1 17 - *941THatig-k �* dm OOATIP, 0,11 MAU u u 0 P U 0 0 0 0 S .. r ej M 0 0 o 0 0 0 A U 0 o o c 0 L' d3 a L -0 a �,j 0 ............. ............... 0 C io o c r o c rj D c f ❑ D DECEMBER MORNING BAM DECEMBER MORNING 9AM DECEMBER MORNING 1 DAM (DEC 21 SUNRISE: 7:51 AM) Lj tJ /Zil/ hN ;l.". o p 6 E ISSUED FOR 0 REFERENCE 1!3 c2 ONLY 0 o 15 E = u o !i 0 cl 0 NOT FOR E o lo o el CONSTRUCTION n m LI a El o a 1 C IN o o SHADOW STUDY DECEMBER AFTERNOON 1 1AM DECEMBER AFTERNOON 12PM DECEMBER AFTERNOON 1 P 03/2 5 1 2 014 v u u 0 0 " 0 P o r c o 13 0 P— L2 u 0 p p 0 0 0 o C 0 o d3 0 13 u -o u a u r n n la D H n El 1 0 0 n 1p c c 0 n E LL rj cl r, 12. 0 N Lq -71 C3 D o. DECEMBER EVENING 2PM DECEMBER EVENING 3PM DECEMBER EVENING 4PM (DEC 21 SUNSET: 4:41 PM) ❑ ❑ O o ❑ ❑ O O esc "L 5"-" A'., iT MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 6725 York Avenue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS - a 9 5kt c � P�V) Renaering Looking NE, MFR kES1 MaiDoi •tc° I'I / a6'.,' I� `�cl, •..ti� ul rd�� I:c _ :� L I (f :(•:i•3 :,c..- - ��I[., �i -_ :2� �� _ � \ j II 16 ��r� ssft ,Il: Ire l �flll AW, .� � � � —_ R � `I b. PC� I � .' -tie � - .7�.i��.} .c. •f` ...� esc ~ MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMEN> 6725 York Avenue South Edina. MN 0828.13 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS aicitiietis - ��+ q k 1 MFR kES1 MaiDoi •tc° I'I / a6'.,' I� `�cl, •..ti� ul rd�� I:c _ :� L I (f :(•:i•3 :,c..- - ��I[., �i -_ :2� �� _ � \ j II 16 ��r� ssft ,Il: Ire l �flll AW, .� � � � —_ R � `I b. PC� I � .' -tie � - .7�.i��.} .c. •f` ...� esc ~ MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMEN> 6725 York Avenue South Edina. MN 0828.13 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS aicitiietis - 5kc c 4 V, rpm ir A. :'�'• DS4 �'r,l�l „i r 1 ' RON !' F t ne t• '<r� i'�'i� ' � uu��1���,, t r', ' i " i l 11 Q� J'yw ■Dd A® - ■�C��� Ali +�� �� r �� �'�' �A Y r .A 9ti��``q,�xetrt mill 1 .0 WHO z Yom.:. :,,. _ •� w. .y,;,nn" 'r""n `: w Rendering Looking SE r1t11 , - -® //.ill,'` EPA Mill ;00011. F LAT _ esc. lloll •o 1: , f1. ►_r r r �► . MIS ■' =� ma�2�� !e Ir ►;�_ 11�F. low : —Ivl — ` .......... . . .... =, . I��!�. f � ice! ii d • �I�� .y�, - ;:,� �° C ri �,d 1 LAW 71 7 '6725 York Av a�ui Diu ° ' an G LTI FAMII Y DEVELOPIM �„� .hue South Edina, MN 08.28.13 k 1: L 1 16 1 a pi ry I' f it t' i ' �,.'. r, I 1 � 1� � : !; ;� �,+�.�,, Or ia, I� I ;, Owl"" k 1: L 1 16 1 a pi a ' •. 7 <. -.� :.ate � ti • Ay -w on p (! F '.• � r�a��"' • Rya � 7�. ■ A � � s : . - w..+.- ',"'"•' ®. °-"= - j uk �..,� �r m IBM { �y� 01�A� '�� rah p� � 1 � ;'�,,: ;. .'�.g �� �.. �� ► :� ;i ;, -- �''�• -, � WS RATS �t� �1� �� �i, ■NNIS i r w `r 6725 YORK AVENUE MULTI - FAMILY DEVELOPMENT - EDINA, MN 04.09.14 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY INVESTORS IF: Memorandum DATE: April 2, 2014 TO: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Chad Milner, Director of Engineering City of Edina FRom. Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE' RE: 6725York Avenue Redevelopment Traffic a nd Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -51 Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed redevelopment of the Wickes Furniture site at 6725 York Avenue. The site is located on the west side of York Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street across from Southdale Shopping Center. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site redevelopment includes 242 multifamily residential units and 13,980 sf of retail uses. Access to the site will be from the two existing driveways on York Avenue. Currently both driveways provide right - in/right -out access. It is being proposed with the development plan that additional left turn access be allowed at the northern driveway. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed. development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and 66t" Street • York Avenue and Southdale site entrance and exit intersections • York Avenue and Site Entrances • York Avenue and 69th Street The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. 5� WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering s Planning • Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 � Minneapolis, MN 55416 &Associates, Inc. Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 1615444700 Memorandum DATE: April 2, 2014 TO: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Chad Milner, Director of Engineering City of Edina FRom. Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE' RE: 6725York Avenue Redevelopment Traffic a nd Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -51 Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed redevelopment of the Wickes Furniture site at 6725 York Avenue. The site is located on the west side of York Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street across from Southdale Shopping Center. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site redevelopment includes 242 multifamily residential units and 13,980 sf of retail uses. Access to the site will be from the two existing driveways on York Avenue. Currently both driveways provide right - in/right -out access. It is being proposed with the development plan that additional left turn access be allowed at the northern driveway. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed. development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and 66t" Street • York Avenue and Southdale site entrance and exit intersections • York Avenue and Site Entrances • York Avenue and 69th Street The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. 5� 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 2 of 14 Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic control include: York Avenue (CSAH 31) is north /south a 4 -lane divided `B" Minor Arterial Hennepin County roadway. Primary access to York Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on York Avenue is 20,200 vehicles per day. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection are as follows: York Avenue at 66th Street - Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching 66th St — one free right, two through, one left NB York Ave approaching 66th St — one free right, two through, two left EB 66th St approaching York Ave — one free right, two through, two left WB 66th St approaching York Ave — one free right, two through, two left York Avenue at Southdale Site Entrance — Sidestreet Stop Sign control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through NB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one continuous right, two through, one left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right out only York Avenue at Southdale Site Exit — Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — two through, one left NB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through EB Site Entrance approaching York Ave — one right /through, two left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right, two left York Avenue at 691h Street — Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching 69th St — one through /right, three through, one left NB York Ave approaching 69th St — one right, three through, one left EB 69th St approaching York Ave — one through /right, one left WB 691h St approaching York Ave — one right, one through, one left PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach counts were conducted during the weeks on July 8th - 21St, 2012. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lower than the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hours were analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. The City recently approved the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. The site is located in the npr-- thwest quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. This project is currently under construction and will have a direct impact on the existing York Avenue traffic. Therefore, it was assumed that the traffic from the Southdale Residential development would be included in the existing (2014) traffic conditions. A Traffic Study was completed for this development which documented the anticipated traffic levels. ✓js� 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 3 of 14 Figure 3. shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study with the 2014 -PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions and any given future year due. to other development within the region. This background - growth must be accounted for and'included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However, in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of I.1.over a 20 year period was used to project traffic from the 2012 counts to the 2014, 2016 and 2030 analysis years. In addition to the regional. background traffic growth, other specific none development related traffic near the site was determined and included with the overall background traffic. These projects included: Byerly's Redevelopment - The City has been working with. Lund Food Holdings for the reconstruction of the existing Byerly's grocery store site, located in the southeast quadrant of France Avenue and Hazelton Road to include: a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store; a six/seven- story 109 -unit apartment building; 'a six/seven- story, 77 -unit apartment building with a f rst floor - 10,711 square foot retail area, and; a six - story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level. This project is currently under construction and will be partially completed in 2014 and assumed to be fully completed for the 2016 analysis. Think Bank Development - The City recently approved the proposed redevelopment of the Szechuari Star site at.3655 Hazelton Road adjacent to the Byerly '.s site to include an 8,441 sf bank building "with.a four lane drive thru. The project is planned for construction.in 2014 and assumed fully completed for the 2016 and 2030 analysis years. Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion — The proposed plan includes the expansion of the emergency center, urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The proposed expansion consists of a 77,500: sf (gross area), two -story building located on the north side of the existing hospital building. This project has been approved by the City Council. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and- 2030 analysis. Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue) —T I O, Qfty, recently approved the redevelopment of the properties in the southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 65t Street. The proposed site included redevelopment of.both the 6500 France Avenue site and the 4005 65t" Avenue site with a five story 96,500 sf medical office building. However, recently the City -was presented a. revised site plan changing the use on the site to a 209 unit senior housing and skilled care " facility. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 analysis. 61 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 4 of 14 Additional Southdale Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that following the renovations, the. mall would have an additional 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space will be occupied and included -in the background traffic for the 2016, and 2030 analysis. Future. Restaurant Development = A future restaurant is anticipated in the northeast quadrant of France -Avenue and 69`h Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8;000 sf in size with approkimately 300 seats. The.analysis assumes the restaurant Will not be developed by 2016 but; will be open.and included and included as part of the 2030 background traffic. The.estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table I. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional development traffic is based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation. Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the Saturday peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Table l - Estimated Additional Background Trin .Generation Use Size PM Peak Hour Saturda Peak Hour Total in Out Total In Out Byerly's Redevelo ment 73,450 sf and 234 units 411 231 180 556 282 274 Think Bank Development 8.441 sf 206 103 103 182 91 91 Hospital Expansion 77,500 sf 24 10 14 30.. 12 18 Senior Housing 209 units 40 18 22 48 22 26 Southdale Apartments 232 units 144 .94 50 118 59 59 Shopping ing Center : 143,880 sf "' 533 256 277 693 333 360 Restaurant 8000 sf 79 47 32 112 67 45 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition Development Site -Trip Generation The estimated trip. generation, from the proposed 6725 York Avenue project is shown below in Table 2. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9`h Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. �S� 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 5 of 14 In addition, it was assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new and that no adjustments were made for dual purpose or pass -by /diverted trips. This also will provide for a worst case traffic condition. Table 2 - Estimated Development Site Trip Generation Use Size PM Peak Hour Satu day Peak Hour Total In - Out Total . In Out Apartments 242 units 150 98 53 126 63 63 Retail 13,980 sf 70 31 39 96 53 43 Total Site 220 129 92 221 116 106 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Trip Distribution Site - generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve it. In general the Trip Distribution was assumed, 30% to the north, 40% to the south, 15% to the east and 15% to the west. The generated trips for the proposed 6725 York Avenue development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on York Avenue, and were assigne&based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2016 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. Four improvement alternatives were evaluated. 1. No Build — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 2. Access Alternative 1— Existing condition, right - in/right -out at the north driveway. Access Alternative 2 — Left in from York Avenue at the north driveway. Figure 4 shows these proposed improvements. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non - development traffic growth to the existing 2012 traffic counts to determine the "No- Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated 6725 York Avenue development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 5 — 9 shows the projected 2016 and 2030 No -Build and Build PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. A51 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 6 of 14 Traffic Operations Existing and /or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the intersections and access driveways on York Avenue. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 1. Existing 2014 Conditions 2. Projected 2016 Alternative 1 3. Projected 2016 Alternative 2 4. Projected 2030 Alternative 1 5. Projected 2030 Alternative 2 This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Analysis Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to snake it through the intersection. At a stop sign- controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and /or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through - street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the tuning at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. AGO 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 7 of 14 Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning - movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro- simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. 1` Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A < 10 <10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80. >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning - movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro- simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. 1` 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 8 of 14 Existing Level of Service Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and 2014 traffic volumes assuming the Southdale Residential project is open. The table shows that all intersection are /would be operating at an overall LOS D or better during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours with all movements operating at LOS E or better. Table 4 — Existing (2014 Level o f Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2016 which is the year after the proposed 6725 York Avenue site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 - 7. Table 5 — Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections at 66th Street and York Avenue and York Avenue and 691h Street. A PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh) (sec/veh) York Ave at 66th St C (E) 34 C (E) 29 York Ave at North Site A (B) 4 A (B) 3 Access /Southdale Entrance York Ave at South Site Access A (A) 3 A (A) 2 York Ave at Southdale Exit C (E) 26 C (E) 23 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 29 C (E) 1 27 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2016 which is the year after the proposed 6725 York Avenue site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 - 7. Table 5 — Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections at 66th Street and York Avenue and York Avenue and 691h Street. A 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 9 of 14 Table S — Forecasted No Build - Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build Access Alternative I, shows that, assuming right - in/right -out access, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build condition. Table 6 — Forecasted Build Access Alternative I - Level of Service 2016 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 30 York Ave at North Site Access /Southdale A (B) 4 A (B) 3 A (B) 5 A (B) 4 Entrance York Ave at South A (A) 3 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 Site Access York Ave at Southdale Exit C (E) 26 C (E) 25 C (E) 27 C (E) 25 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 1 29 C (E) 1 28 D (E) 34 1 C (E) 28 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build Access Alternative I, shows that, assuming right - in/right -out access, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build condition. Table 6 — Forecasted Build Access Alternative I - Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. A-5 2016 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hur Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec/veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 31 York Ave at North Site Access /Southdale A (B) 4 A (B) 4 A (B) 5 A (B) 4 Entrance York Ave at South A (B) 3 A (B) 3 A (B) 3 A (B) 3 Site Access York Ave E Southdale E xit C (E) 26 C (E) 25 C (E) 27 C (E) 25 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 31 C (E) 29 D (E) 37 C (E) 29 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. A-5 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 10 of 14 Table 7— Forecasted Build Access Alternative 2, assuming a left turn in at the northern site access, has similar results as Access Alternative 1 showing that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. Specificlly the proposed left turn in movement from York Avenue to the North Site Access would be operating at an LOS C in both 2016 and 2030. All other movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2016 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build or Build Alternative 1 condition. Table 7— Forecasted Build Access Alternative 2 - Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle OueuinQ Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2016 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queues with the proposed Site Access Alternatives. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. Table 8 shows the results of the queuing analysis for the 2030 full build of the area conditions. The results found that during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, with both access alternatives for 2016 and 2030 conditions, the maximum and average queues do not exceed any of the available or proposed turn lane storage on York Avenue. However, at both site access driveways the maximum queue will block parking spaces. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. In addition, observations at the other none site access intersections showed that, in some cases the maximum queues were exceeded. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In all cases the queues exceed the storage in the left turn lanes by 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less and would clear without blocking the adjacent driveways or intersection and not impacting through traffic. �G 2016 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturda Peak PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) (sec /veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 31 York Ave at North Site Access /Southdale A (C) 5 A (C) 6 A (C) 6 A (C) 7 Entrance York Ave at South A (B) 3 A (C) 4 A (C) 3 A (C) 4 Site Access, York Ave at C (E) 31 C (E) 25 C (E) 28 C (E) 25 Southdale Exit York Ave at 69th St C (E) 31 1 C (E) 29 1 D (E) 37 1 C (E) 29 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle OueuinQ Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2016 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queues with the proposed Site Access Alternatives. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. Table 8 shows the results of the queuing analysis for the 2030 full build of the area conditions. The results found that during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, with both access alternatives for 2016 and 2030 conditions, the maximum and average queues do not exceed any of the available or proposed turn lane storage on York Avenue. However, at both site access driveways the maximum queue will block parking spaces. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. In addition, observations at the other none site access intersections showed that, in some cases the maximum queues were exceeded. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In all cases the queues exceed the storage in the left turn lanes by 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less and would clear without blocking the adjacent driveways or intersection and not impacting through traffic. �G 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 11 of 14 Table 8: Site Access Maximum Vehicle Queues Parking Demand The parking demand for the proposed site development was analyzed based on the anticipated use for the site and the PCD -3 zoning. Based on the current City Code the proposed development would require a total of parking spaces. The current site plan includes 6400 spaces. Table 9 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Table 9 —Parking Required per City Code Use Size Rate Available Site Access Alternative (feet) Location Direction Approaching Vehicle Queuing Alt 1— Right-in Multi- Residential 242 units 1 /unit 242 Storage / Right -out Alt 2 — Left in York Ave Southbound Left Site Access 110 NA 97 at North 95 (Retail /Restaurant) (9,655 sf / 120 (Restaurant = 1 /3seats (112) seats /12 employees) + 1/employee on shift) Site Access Eastbound Right York Ave 50 72 101 York Ave at South Eastbound Right York Ave 50 85 86 Site Access Parking Demand The parking demand for the proposed site development was analyzed based on the anticipated use for the site and the PCD -3 zoning. Based on the current City Code the proposed development would require a total of parking spaces. The current site plan includes 6400 spaces. Table 9 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Table 9 —Parking Required per City Code Use Size Rate Parking Parking Required Provided Multi- Residential 242 units 1 /unit 242 419 8 /1st 1000sf+ Retail 13,980 sf 6 /additional 1000sf 86 95 (Retail /Restaurant) (9,655 sf / 120 (Restaurant = 1 /3seats (112) seats /12 employees) + 1/employee on shift) Total Parking 328 (354) 514 Source: City of Edina — PCD Zoning District The parking demand was also analyzed based on industry standards. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`h Edition. Table 10 below shows the estimated parking generation rate and the anticipated peak parking demand on a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case conditions for the parking assuming the proposed full development of the site. A6- 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 12 of 14 Table 10 — Site Parking Demand per ITE Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Based on the results of the parking. analysis, it can be concluded that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for the proposed development plan. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed 6725 York redevelopment project includes the addition of 242 apartment _ units and 13,980 sf of associated retail space. The site is anticipated to generate 220 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 221 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing (2014) traffic operations, assuming the Southdale Residential project is completed, all the intersections and driveways on York Avenue are operating at overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Two build site access alternatives were analyzed. Access Alternative 1 included a right - in /right -out at the northern access to the site. Access Alternative 2 included a left in access from York Avenue to the northern site access. • Intersection traffic operations for both access alternatives in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur as a result of the proposed full build conditions in 2016 or 2030. �4 Weekday Use Size Rate Parking Required Multi- Family 242 units 1.20 /unit 291 Residential Retail 13,980 sf 4.1 /1000sf 58 (Retail / Restaurant) (9,655 sf / 4325 so (4.1 /1000sf / 13.3 /1000sf) (98) Total Parking 349 (389) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Based on the results of the parking. analysis, it can be concluded that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for the proposed development plan. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed 6725 York redevelopment project includes the addition of 242 apartment _ units and 13,980 sf of associated retail space. The site is anticipated to generate 220 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 221 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing (2014) traffic operations, assuming the Southdale Residential project is completed, all the intersections and driveways on York Avenue are operating at overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Two build site access alternatives were analyzed. Access Alternative 1 included a right - in /right -out at the northern access to the site. Access Alternative 2 included a left in access from York Avenue to the northern site access. • Intersection traffic operations for both access alternatives in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur as a result of the proposed full build conditions in 2016 or 2030. �4 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 13 of 14 • The proposed addition of the left turn in (Access Alternative 2) would not create operational or vehicle queuing issues in the 2016 or future 2030 build conditions. • The existing or proposed available parking would meet the City's Code and are below those identified by ITE. No parking space variances would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Construct the access and pedestrian accommodations as shown in the site plan (Figure 2). 2. Provide the proposed roadway improvements as shown for Access Alternative 2 (Figure 4), providing a left turn in from York Avenue at the North Site Access. This will require Hennepin County approval.. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed 6725 York Avenue development. Al Dote: Printed: 313112014 WSB Fllenome: K: \01686 -510 \Cad \Exh /Dlts \1686 -51 fig -0l- Project Locotion.dgn .� \zv y N WI1L1RNY G Ug A L E 1 AVE. AN � y U - - soaFA tlO m w CN3'i BLVD. —, �7 < O Ao 26. yam a� n � JOSEPH INE AVE. . y 26. SHERWOOD AVE. °z a Q 03 D Q a 0 p m N dtL' Z O (1] A ° 1 ° R D a �(�a COMPUTER AVE. A d� �V� f �y° �ARDO n ^ 7 BRITTANY RD. RYAN AVE. + RYAN AVE g o PARNELL� AVE. =C� O� o n •y0 OS `„ PARNELL AVE. � o C CD %D O Q m CD �� Cn n r r/ 0 ° LA. m X WEST n � m = o SHOE I fi DR. R n WOOppA �� = m� z' r o m � � AV LE a� n ° ° m o v vC •� m m RISC I DR. ^ o -v o F 2 ��7N1� VIRGIN�r y5 v1RGINIA AVE. �D�� L v m w ] n DR. /HHII ❑AS � r ASHCROF� in �C CRESTON RD. L T p Z n m WOOD DALE o Z ?� v r MILLER'S v / /Jg� F// cn ° N a CD .a r KELLOGG AVE. _ �� n o v o r Q �KELLOGG AVE. OAKLA WN ^ A LJ a ASE. j� o POINT Z DR. S] OSE o C LAWN. n .1 CT z L D c AVE. ° m PARKLAWN p�E' v CORNELIA DR. �R.A rrco GGLOU CHESTER DR. GLOUCHESN 2 HEATHERTON HEATHERTO n CIR. BLVD. OAK ^ o AVE. COR NELIA CIR. a L BROOKVIEW AVE. VEILLIC F < d sl q 00 OR. qIk < + <qsp� v J m 7 a� BR1ST0� Z Z �yy`�~ LYMAR m �o N U) GALLAGER �, ° LA. S RD. �� PEACEDALE N ppTypQLE `�Dr� v 7 AVE. C O cn Q HALIFAX 61 o m � � + o LYNMAR aLA. SAND ' ELL AVE. L �. FRANCE AVE. D 000000 N = A n D N - N F :7 n o LOFENTRY PL. Z ~ � EDINBOROUGH WAY 00!'ENTRY LA. AVE. L Oo0 OOO� 7 � (-] C 2 V1 O O a + < S DREW N m z Lo (D� vAVE. COLONY BEARD 0 ry WAY �J >- 0 n i < m • YORK N 1 I nt 3 No BARRIE � AVE. RD. _ 0 C1 -n o O o YORK TER. XERXES 0 0 0 0 0 e YORK AVE D p NN AVE• m � � _� � XERXES AVE. Ln A17a is FIRM '2.ur �1 ✓IG, Tpi � i i �► � ilh {ate r•� ' � or 1111I1!11111'1711 Rom ME ;� � �� �� _ :eee:eee:eee =eee:e a - � �,��• n �� � �IAiIAA�IAIAAAiAMAi .'� ��' �` ,'�_. i'� �'°�:. ���.� ��ew: wee. 11 ' ��acy:,' -•. 1 A17a e5 30 () i p■■ ��M[� pia romp "rfwt�lfNU1 1111r1nY �w� Ii M�i1�11f �fM. M' 1 /IM Mhf � ° �"' 860(330) . ♦, 'd` -' - J ^� ° r 310(370). Lt C; 0(0) A� 6q j7c' a�` i].^ Tf I��� :�'�..r....^.....- .•..+_.,� -��Y ��� �¢i�. r 795(105) i - ...,«.:o ,".. : t Iii•• 7f m£ xA:i 750(320) {; C 'T ■ �..., .`Yr' � t a�:. �I 1 �. 225(165) '% . S• R 5(10) ,• � `T �i° ,E 't _,.�_ n! o (0) S 1 t P A T o�fio v, J F F Z ti \ (rta'• On 1 % `V or r • f� ' r f � aa� ae .<I. \+a l 135(150). r 1. -, _.- .__�tia;-- 7 � •r �t ?;1 �' 15(20) /' 135 (160) r` 0(0) A 1 t T -� �� 175 (165) � 1 -• 20 (20) +I 1ss(tss) ys ,r 3 LEGEND ,..j •:a "..,..�, Thru- Stop lntersection 1��.�' , Signalized Intersection a r1r' _ f. 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts 1 i. �r ;4 Ir 45(55) 41 t i ' N flyl1iff Turning Movement Direction 49th \C� o e Traffic and Parking Study Figure 3 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements �• City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 Existing Conditions 0 F R� i a + +tom w , r t� � .��� ��111111111� 111 1�1 �����"�`,.: .•.�a�.; `, ;� J: .. a hiz t� �11� M 1 _ ��1111 I �F ►1. €•�`� �- 90(35) 1 *ir �Ii � rnry 11 K I �M Mhl F 4•• 880(340) ��. 1 a - •., '.3 m o '�' 380 (320) U on �� dr Op t J o (o) '� '1 r — x zoo(t1o) — a r`.tJa"a►; :a >���.1 '3' 11i�►7t�d..x.s� . _ „ — ° — • .�- 1 765(330) .� m ' � � 4 �.>r✓t� u 230(170) 1i try77 ' L 1� r 0 o Zt IJ 0(0) t R 50(55) o (o) a i ! ` 0(0) iz A 0 (0) 'fl !� r Ly 735(150) 15(20) Ir 135(160) _ �j. 4 ♦� r'i �} i 1 .,• p.. 1 75(100) 5 1 r +' ao � r ll t '1 140 (150) ! 175(165) '/ o o - • - _ r 45(55) 20(20) '' 165(195) C; 0(0) o (o) t r 1 :f �,`�AA14 I �� ,�j• 225 (265) J r a? ►i �1 .� e - yam. f __ F,f 1 165(95) -► Q A. 1so(165) LEGEND O F _ Intersection of Interest 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts 41111F Turning Movement Direction ! 1 a 7 i- LtKtIQ r - 0 Te Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 f( y 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements City of Edina, Minnesota 2016 Access Alternative 1 A-73 0 Aj t_ 41VT�h'tff ��bb 1r��frf� �11(r fl Ri'r', •� f htm� Mr •rf1F i , w A ; r1on if rtinr r1 / ��i 1ii� tllw�±ir1�. Nf 1 r enf t _ �• ..w• V`S, fill ."1'�`Vi.•a -.f �k}' .oa.: --.:v, x• a ._ ._ _ �.11Mt�rte•�i�..... _- t..� ..` a • o ^t 4 r- 55 (65) 4— 0 (0) _i / � r.r/ • 1:" r� a r. •� +'°� t• 135 (150) - J j U 4 0(0) rr 0(0) A t r 175(165) a1 0 20 (20) r ' 165(195) 1 Ya 416 Ak LEGEND _ M �r '^L r •' 1'1 7'r v - - 77 I. r V ♦a = t r . -;T? ':rMrf" s. R 90(35) 880(340) " I" 400 (340) J j 4 U r► 0 (0) 0 (0) A I t r 200(110) o _) 765(330) `; 260(795) •y ..i roo, � 50 (80) 140 (150) 45 (55) J j U C; 0(0) 0(0) 41.) A 1 t r 210(245) •� o 150(165) O- i r Intersection of Interest 77- .,.."'*�} ( �— 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts c _ S flyltr Turning Movement Direction r n }Qj Ij ..... ....r S I 1 1.._7 17 _ ij' I • ^� Traffic and Parking Study Figure 6 o e' 0 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements °•, +r�,,� City of Edina, Minnesota 2016 Access Alternative 2 Alt o e o or 0(0) J j I. U C; 0(0) 0 (0) 5 A 1 t r 0(0). -0 o 0 0 (0) ..i roo, � 50 (80) 140 (150) 45 (55) J j U C; 0(0) 0(0) 41.) A 1 t r 210(245) •� o 150(165) O- i r Intersection of Interest 77- .,.."'*�} ( �— 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts c _ S flyltr Turning Movement Direction r n }Qj Ij ..... ....r S I 1 1.._7 17 _ ij' I • ^� Traffic and Parking Study Figure 6 o e' 0 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements °•, +r�,,� City of Edina, Minnesota 2016 Access Alternative 2 Alt T. Fir c, 3 ti� "R' "'a' V a, • p 11GEA hN'a1MW� M� j ! ►Fkl tf i M 1, 1�_• �" :5 (30) lot1'11.11. �t:Nf'ar 6n'►Iff 6tt N1 ; • [.' f a" 935 355 r •I,� fl X11 iI X11 1 _ 1 �' ( ) 400(340) �M, rMO + . ' J 0 (0) A 1 t I' �� .- ._yy,y�j '��i� :'.r.;� _ r �ys •_i" �_ 215(115) ~ l�Ir+ fp i1�11�".�• 7 �ti 177iR: �'I k��_-_ _� �` ° n m 915(350) � � m i kF '/ n 1 ' + <� I I� ',il . zas(tao) •ti �. %. 55(65) UC;! 0(0) w^ 0 (0) 4, 41 S t 1' 9 0(0) !� 55(55) N.V • •'a 1 r 0l0) or 0 fsl• ',�t,�i 1 i 0(0) ~ r- 4- 135(150) , T �1 Id a.._ ' _____� '.• - , 1 4 .. i . '• ° 135 (160) _ - i� fi• y W7 4 U g 0 (01 r� �► + 75 (100) 0 (0) z ll `1 t '� - — a'•' 145 (145) r 45 (55) y w ° •- m` m i°n o 20 ( 20 ) N ��F•7tijli \w tH \� af- t Op 165(195) �' .0 "• � ' o(o) 5 � 1 t 1' 225(265) J ° R' .r, ° `' -p�� � ) • ��' .;.' ` 165(95) �► � � � i w• ,•, Mlvr � LEGEND Intersection of Interest T --. - PIT r 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts , y _I - N flrl1r Turning Movement Direction # *' _. _ w }] • ��`.,) �B8F,i i ,ems" 1� 1�._`l�i°1_� 4-• - _mow ..... ': 0 9e , Traffic and Parking Study Figure 7 r\ )) 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements r M t�� City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Access Alternative 1 X 7T- r 1 ��1111�� ttMM ,, ` °�'•Wil aalFnA6' - r� •='� _ 6 95(30) 111•R 116111M 111/1 - l' �f t •� F 1111iF 1N1 935(355) SO 420(360) 215(115) J C m { 1 •~ %dl •�� S t • t'1. 6 2 75(205) _► fir: "� t ,� Y! • r � _^� ::5 , 55(65) or (0) a r,. ='r i� ♦ N 3 �. 0 (0) 5 A ti t xt • 0(0 y % ' :r • 1 f • WI 11) 55(55). • r .�•.1, 0 (0) 1 t r o On 01 ° o °... 775 (1 W) 15(20). -�' " r 135(160) i- 0(0) a S t 4 J - 1• ", ' __ __ ° amr ~ 145(145) t 175(165) o - n B ` • / k V 165 �� t € `+,. (.iff•i19_ J i C► 0(% 1 19 % i • I 6 4 4 r +._ 0(0) tl 1 t r ` • • �� x'41 yi _� 210245 J _ i " 165(95) ��p•Y 150(165) LEGEND `i 9js <i`} 'sir OIntersection of Interest 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts 1 flyl1F Turning Movement Direction 1 0 ffi, Traffic and Parking Study Figure 8 /y 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements 4 City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Access Alternative 2 A -7 T Planner Comments U// Planner Teague told the Commission staff received a Sketch Plan Review for 67.25 York Avenue (the former Wick's). Teague explained the - applicant is in negotiation with the owners of Wick's and the five (5) residential. homes fronting Xerxes Avenue. Teague stated the subject site is currently zoned PCD -3:- Continuing, Teague said the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing commercial and thefive.single family homes and build a six - story, 273 unit upscale apartment building with 22,289.square feet of retail space on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail component on York with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Teague reported to accommodate the request four (4) amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required as follows: o Building Height —from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet G Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 82 o Floor Area Ratio — from 1.0 to 3.1 o Re- guiding the land use for the six single - family homes from tow Density Residential to Community Activity Center: Teague concluded the applicant is Considering a rezoning of the properties to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC Applicant Presentation Mr. Chmielewski gave a brief history on Lennar and explained that originally they only considered the Wick's site; however felt only utilizing that site pushed the envelope.so they decided to approach residential property owners on Xerxes to obtain those houses and add them to the site. Continuing, Chmielewski said they propose to build a high -end luxury multifamily rental community with complimentary retail. Chmielewski introduced Aaron Russet to further speak to the proposal. Mr. Russet told the Commission they are very happy to be in Edina. Russet referred to the density and explained that the calculations presented in the redevelopment materials did not include the five single family homes they are hoping to acquirer Continuing, Russet. explained they are proposing to build a 273 -,unit upscale multifamily complex that is six (6) stories with retail below. Russet said the attraction to this site is the walkability factor, adding from this Page 9 of 14 A77 location the residents of the building have access to all venues, shopping, City Park, library, Government Center, etc. Russet further explained that their intent is to create an urban mixed -use, pedestrian friendly sustainable community. As previously mentioned by.Mr... Chmielewski the area offers abundance to_ amenities and this creates an environment without dependence on daily automobile trips. Continuing, Russet•said they are committed to sustainable design principles reflected in the City's'Comprehensive Plan. He added their intent will feature green elements . including green construction, practices, material specification, thermal high- efficiency windows and numerous planted green spaces both on the site as well as on the..roof. Russet said they are also working with the White Group on sustainability. With graphics Mr. Russet concluded highlighting the following aspects of the project: o Open terraces on both ends of the project (pocket parks) G Walking paths of high quality pavement o Decorative lighting o Front doors o All parking is proposed to be contained within o Building is designed open to the south o Exterior building materials include transparent glass storefront, masonry and "Edina" limestone at street level. Above includes composition of masonry, architectural metal and large amounts of glass O Unit breakdown 7% studio. 40% one bedroom, 11% one bedroom plus den and 32% two bedrooms. Chair Staunton thanked the development team for their presentation and explained the Sketch Plan Review process'is informal and nonbinding: Commissioner Grabiel stated he was encouraged that someone was considering purchasing the site and redeveloping the property. Grabiel acknowledged he was somewhat concerned when he first reviewed the materials; however, if the five residential homes are acquired that's a different story. Grabiel asked if three bedrooms or two bedrooms plus den were ever considered. Mr. Russetresponded that this development would be a "rent by choice" and they, have found that many people that rent by choice are ;either downsizing or desire smaller living space. Russet explained that at this time they are waiting for an update of the market study; however, it appears the market may be for smaller spaces. Continuing, Grabiel acknowledged this is an area of heightened activity, questioning if the market is sound for this type of project in such a dense area. Russet responded'that population metrics indicated a drop in home ownership and for every percent home ownership drops a million families need a home. Walkability is also a very important factor in home choice and this area is highly walkable. Page 10 of 14 Commissioner Carpenter asked if the owners of the homes have been contacted. Mr. Chmielewski said that process is continuing through a real estate broker adding two of the homes are in foreclosure and it takes a little more time when working with banks. Commissioner. Carr stated she really loves the look of the building but does have a concern with the proposed density; which is clearly on the high side. Carr said she agreed with the comments from Grabiel especially on unit size, adding the two bedroom with den in her opinion would be an attractive choice. Carr said in her opinion the project is intriguing and if special care is taken in buffering the residential properties in Richfield this may be a good project. Concluding Carr noted that with regard to the retail space depicted on the plans the applicant should be aware for future retail tenants that the abutting property is la large grocery store. Mr. Chmielewski said with regard to unit numbers, spacing and size it's important to find the right density to ensure that the project will be successful. Chmielewski said the property owners reside in New York City and their price for the subject property reflects the New York City market. Chmielewski said the development team would take under advisement all comments from the Commission and would make every effort to buffer Xerxes Avenue. He added at this time their intent through design is to make the units feel and look like townhomes /brownstones vs. the traditional apartment building look. Commissioner Schroeder said he finds the project and site plan interesting, adding he likes the connectivity and other elements of the project; however has a few concerns about the Xerxes Avenue side. Schroeder said the Xerxes Avenue component of the project is the most difficult to address. He pointed out as presented the proposed fagade facing Xerxes Avenue is imposing. He suggested that they reconsider the large fagade and relocate a portion of the building by placing it on top of the building nearest France Avenue. This change; in his opinion, would better suit the site, adding height in this area is.generally found along York Avenue; not Xerxes (Westin, new Southdale apartments etc.). Continuing Schroeder pointed out when considering the projects impact on Xerxes Avenue, vehicle traffic, especially truck traffic, needs to be further reviewed. Schroeder stated if left as is all truck traffic would only occur on Xerxes Avenue. Concluding Schroeder asked the applicants to consider "marrying" the subject sites loading dock area with the Cub Foods loading dock. This action would reduce and mitigate all delivery traffic. Commissioner Scherer complemented the look of the building but shared concerns over the amount of concrete on the site and its impact on Richfield. Commissioner Platteter stated that overall he's not opposed to the density of the project or building height; however, has a concern with the ramp accessing the underground parking. Platteter suggested that this access point be relocated more to the middle to avoid confusion. With regard to connectivity Platteter said he likes the incorporation this project - includes to enhance pedestrian spaces. Concluding, Platteter said he also supports the requirement for affordable housing. Page 11 of 14 _ 471 Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he knows the zoning classification the City of Richfield has on their side of Xerxes (east). Teague responded he's not sure of that zoning. He added he knows that Richfield either has or is going through a rezoning process for this area to allow for more density. Grabiel said during the review process the City needs to keep in mind what's best for Edina while being respectful to the City of Richfield. The development team acknowledged that much of their focus is in "the devils in the details ", adding they really appreciate the comments from the Commission. Mr. Russet acknowledged this site is a challenge; however believes it's worth it. Commissioner Forrest said that while the project has good points she is concerned with how portions of the project violate the Comprehensive plan. Forrest added as previously mentioned the homes across the street from this project will be impacted. She concluded she likes the look but has concerns. The discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the project has merit; however, wants the development team to take a further look at reducing the buildings impact on Xerxes Avenue, increase greenspace where possible, consider the City Comprehensive Plan during the design process, reconsider the fagade of the building as it relates to Xerxes Avenue, carefully consider the retail tenant mix, better design the building's access point and continue to work on the loading dock area and the underground parking access, etc. Also it is very important to work with the residents of Richfield to reduce and or minimize the buildings impact on them. Chair Staunton thanked the applicant for sharing their sketch plan with them. Staunton stated he hopes their venture is successful adding that so far no one has found something that could work for this site. Staunton reiterated his thanks and stressed to the applicant the importance of communicating with the City of Richfield. The applicants ensured Chair Staunton they would engage the City of Richfield and Xerxes Avenue residents. B. 2014 W Chair Staunton told the Co mission every fall the nning Commission Work Plan is discussed and prioritized. Staunton sai hat at this tim a would like Commissioners to start thinking about the 2014 Work Plan. Sta to said topic suggestions should be forwarded to Teague or him prior to the Commission m tin Staunton concluded that his goal for finalizing the Work Plan is for some time in Sept er or October. Commissioner Scherer note may be a .00d idea to discuss the Work Plan prior to a Commission meetZONDENCE missioners agr d. VIII. CORR AND PETITIO /000" Page 12 of 14 iA on Series 20138 was at a 3% inter Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2013 -80, Awarding Sale o s Series 201313. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Spragu enson, Hovla Motion carried. VIII.B. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — 6725 YORK AVENUE (WICK'S SITE) AND FIVE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON XERXES AVENUE TO THE EAST OF 6725 YORK — REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the request of Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC for sketch plan review of its proposal to redevelop the property at 6725 York Avenue. The proposed project would also include five single - family houses on Xerxes Avenue. The proponent was in negotiations with these property owners to purchase and incorporate the houses into the development. Mr. Teague stated the property at 6725 York (the former Wick's building site) was currently zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3, and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. The five - single family houses were zoned and guided for low- density residential use. The proponent was requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing commercial building and the five single - family houses and build a six -story, 273 unit, and upscale apartment building with 22,289 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot was proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue and underground parking for residents. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident's guests. The loading area for the market would be at the rear of the retail building and south side of the apartment building. Mr. Teague advised that to accommodate the request, four amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: Building Height from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet; Housing Density from 30 units per acre to 59 units per acre; Floor Area Ratio from 1.0 to 1.55; Re- guiding the land use for the six single - family houses from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. In addition to the amendments, a rezoning of all the properties would then be required to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Mr. Teague stated the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan and provided comments relating to reducing the buildings impact on Xerxes Avenue, increasing greenspace where possible, consideration of the City Comprehensive Plan during the design process, reconsidering the fagade of the building as it relates to Xerxes Avenue, need for continued work on the loading dock area and the underground parking access, and incorporation of affordable housing. Proponent Presentation Peter Chmielewski, Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC, introduced the concept of the sketch plan for the property located at 6725 York Avenue with five single - family houses on Xerxes Avenue to the east of 6725 York Avenue. Mr. Chmielewski discussed the intent to build a high -end luxury multifamily rental community with complimentary retail. Aaron Russet, ESG Architects, provided a presentation on the subject sketch plan, the setback on Xerxes Avenue, landscaping, walking path /sidewalk network, gathering spots, outdoor seating area, retail element, landscape buffer, and parking. The Council discussion included concern relating to the six story height across from single - family houses, the importance to include affordable units, incorporating a green roof over the market, option of utilizing podium height along Xerxes Avenue, improving the articulation /fagade of the market area, reduction in density, including some smaller units in unit mix, greenspace, additional work needed on the appearance of the townhouses, concern with the loading dock area and underground parking access, and concern with the concept of routing truck traffic onto Xerxes Avenue. VIII.C. SECOND READING GRANTED — Z G . ANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R -1 & R -2 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS; O ANCE NO.2013 -09 — ADOPTED Community Development Director Presen on Page 4 As V MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 9, 2014 7:00 PM I. CALL TO 11. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Pops, Olsen, Kilberg, Hay/a, Lee, Carr, Platteter, Staunton Members absent from roll: Scherer kd Forrest 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AG Commissioner Carr moved approval of a eting agenda as amended to honor the request of the proponent to continue Item VI.C. Pr minary zoning & Variances, Mathias Mortenson, 3923 West 49th Street, Edina, MN. Commissio er Platteter conded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA \ A. Minutes of the R ular Meeting of the Edina lanning Commission March 12, 2014 Commissioner Car moved approval of the Consent Age da and January 22, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner a seconded the motion. All voted aye; otion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Chair unton asked if anyone would like to speak; being none, ommissioner Platteter moved to X community comment Commissioner Lee seconded the moti n. All voted aye; public ent closed. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Preliminary Rezoning, and Preliminary Development Plan. Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC. 6725 York Avenue, 6628, 6700, 6704, 6708, & 6712 Xerxes Avenue, Edina, MN Commissioner Potts recused himself from consideration of this agenda item because his company works with this applicant on a different project in a different city. He left the Council Chambers at 7:05 p.m. Page 1 of 14 "(I V ,, Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Lennar Corporation is proposing to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and five single - family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700, and 6628 Xerxes Avenue. The applicant would then build a six -story, 242 -unit upscale apartment building with 12,500 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. Planner Teague delivered a power point presentation highlight the project including the green space and swimming pool above the parking deck. He recalled the changes the applicant has made since the original sketch plat review, including the elimination of the loading dock, decreasing total number of units, creation of podium height along Xerxes, creating better pedestrian connections, and new green features. He noted that the road system can support the development and the parking is adequate. Planner Teague concluded his presentation by indicating that staff recommends the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 70 feet. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from 1.0 to 1.27. ➢ Re- guiding the Land Use Plan for the six single - family homes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. Approval is subject to the following findings: I . The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The City of Richfield has guided the single - family homes on the east side of Xerxes as medium density residential; therefore, the long -term vision of both Edina and Richfield in this area is for higher densities. 2. Podium height is proposed on both Xerxes and York as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. The six -story portion of the building is stepped back into the site to minimize impact on adjacent property. 3. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use at 1.27, which is predominantly residential, is appropriate for the area. 4. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. Planner Teague indicated that staff also recommends the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue and build a six -story, 242 unit upscale apartment building with 12,500 square feet of retail on the first level. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — Page 2 of 14 '/ V CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 3. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. 4. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. 5. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 6. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 7. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 8. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian - Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is subject to the following conditions: I . The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 3 & 25, 2014. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. Page 3 of 14 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014. . 6. At the time of building permit application, compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the chief building official's memo dated March 27, 2014. 7. Work with staff and Hennepin County to secure a left turn in lane from south bound York Avenue. 8. Ten percent (10 %) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. Specific detail would be determined at the time of Final approval. 9. Sustainable design principles must be used. Greater detail shall be provided with the Final Rezoning submittal. 10. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Commissioner Platteter asked about the sidewalks in the sketch. Planner Teague pointed out the sketch shows sidewalks' extending beyond what the developer is proposing; adding they will likely be added when adjacent properties develop in the future. Commissioner Platteter asked about the setback from the building to the nearby residential home (Richfield). Planner Teague estimated an approximate 30 -foot setback from the Xerxes right -of -way to the house; plus the setback for the proposed apartment building. Commissioner Carr asked about the seventh story that is displayed on the west side of the building. Planner Teague responded that will be a good question for the applicant. Commissioner Olsen asked about how the loading dock will work with the retail. Planner Teague pointed out the traffic pattern for delivery trucks. Commissioner Olsen asked Chuck Richart, WSB & Associates, how vehicles would get to the south. Mr. Richart stated they would either do a U -turn on 66th Street or turn onto France, adding this type of movement was assumed as part of the study. Chair Staunton observed if the rezoning request was to PCD -3 three setback variances would be required, along with the building height, and the floor area ratio. Planner Teague concurred. Commissioner Olsen noted Hennepin County Public Works recommended widening the boulevard on Xerxes. Planner Teague indicated that will be part of future discussions, along with the landscaping requirements. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Development Manager, Lennar Multi - Family Communities Aaron Russet, ESG Architects Applicant Presentation Mr. Chmielewski stated Lennar Multi - Family Communities specializes in doing condo high -rise style in first -tier cities. Lennar is very interested in making this the right project with the right materials and integrating it with the community. He thanked the Planning Commission and the Council for pushing for a redesign in certain areas. Lennar has worked to keep the integrity and language of the building the same, while bringing back some sensitivities. Lennar has hired a broker to handle options agreements Page 4 of Aq(x Ab V with the homes on Xerxes; a representative with Lennar has met with each of the homeowners to discuss their needs and wants. Mr. Russet commented this is an incredible area to act as a bridge between very dense commercial areas between single - family homes in the Richfield neighborhood. He pointed out several of the changes that have been made since the last design presented. Accesses were eliminated through the site onto Xerxes. The only physical connections to Xerxes are the front porches and sidewalks all the way to the road. Eventually, hopefully, the sidewalks will connect north /south. The retail space has decreased from 22,000 square foot to 12,500. The original grocer did not work out, so now the idea is to have the retailers fit well into the residences of this site. He discussed the changes in underground parking, trash pick -up, as well as the area designated for resident moving. Mr. Russet noted that the seventh story is just an architectural feature in order to acknowledge the front door. One of the options considered will be two -story windows. There are now two courtyards rather than one, which has helped increase the undulations of the building fa4ade. He noted the increased square footages of the residential units, which will be more appropriate for those selling houses in Edina but wanting to stay in Edina. The composition materials will be two colors of brick, stucco, some metal panel and some fiber cement panel. Discussion Commissioner Carr complimented the architect on the new design. Chair Staunton asked about the podium stepbacks on Xerxes. Mr. Russet presented the front porch elevations and pointed out the 5 -foot and 3 -foot stepbacks. From the previous design, the building moved back 12 feet, plus 5 feet and also 3 feet. Mr. Chmielewski noted the architect wanted to create multiple setbacks, multiple uses, patios above the walk -outs, then bays, and then balconies, with a flat facade along the top. He pointed out there is a lot happening on the Xerxes fagade that helps it appear it is further back than it actually is. Chmielewski added the goal was to push the building back as far as possible while still making it a viable, adding this is one of the highest - priced pieces of land that has ever been purchased in Edina. Concluding, Chmielewski reported other developers have tried to make something work and could not from a metric - standpoint, adding Lennar has worked on this the past year to try to make it feasible. Chair Staunton noted the building is set back quite a ways from York Avenue. He asked if any thought had been given to pushing the retail space closer to York Avenue so the apartment building could be pushed back from Xerxes without losing any net space. Mr. Chmielewski responded the goal was to have a boulevard protect the sidewalk. including a minimum parking depth, minimum drive lane, and then brought the building forward as much as possible. Chmielewski stated in his opinion retailers want adequate parking and height, the building has to be set back beyond it, otherwise the ability to have the residential is lost. He concluded Lennar pulled the building towards York as near as possible. Chair Staunton asked about the parking spaces being flush with York. Mr. Chmielewski responded it is basically flush. He noted there was discussion about sinking the parking, but general contractors gave a lot of pushback regarding excavation. Page 5 of 14 Aao � C V •40 Commissioner Olsen noted additional setback from Xerxes would have been nice. She asked if there was a way to reduce the building height in order to consider some of Richfield's comments about four stories. Mr. Russet responded that he worked on Oxford Hills on Grand Ave, adding this is the same type of setback principle used. A challenge of setbacks is the contractors do not like transitions, and plumbing cores need to go all the way through. This makes much larger units along the first and second floors. Russet also pointed out as the building goes up, the kitchen and bathroom plumbing lines are stacked. Concluding, Russet said because of the retail; it is easier to push things back on the York side. The stacking element of the design really drove the discussions. Mr. Chmielewski concurred the Xerxes has been pushed back as far as it can go. Commissioner Lee asked about the newly created green space on the upper northeast. Mr. Russet responded he believes the green space may be approximately a third of an acre. Commissioner Lee asked about proposed retail tenants. Mr. Chmielewski responded a local broker is working on the tenant mix at this time. He added they believe the larger space would be a high -end restaurant, and the other could be a daytime breakfast/coffee or a yoga studio, something that does not compete with the high -end restaurant. Mr. Russet summarized it is not specific to the demographic, but it certainly has to be complimentary. Chair Staunton asked about a proposed green space in the north corner. Mr. Chmielewski responded the goal for that area is to maintain it as more of a grass /open field. This area could be used by all the residents of the area, rather than just the residents of the building. Commissioner Olsen asked about consideration of sustainable guidelines. Mr. Russet responded ESG inherently has green base specifications, from sealants to carpets to paints. One of the major sustainable features of this site is the location. On weekends, this site has an amazing opportunity for residents to use features without a car. Additionally, it is a walkable area. In both courtyards, there is a substantial amount of green roof. Mr. Chmielewski added that being a long -term holder and operator means efficient electricals and minimizing water use in this building and also helps Lennar's bottom line. Also under exploration is a possible shared garden space in the courtyard. Commissioner Carr asked about bicycle racks. Mr. Russet responded there will be ample bike storage to meet the needs of residents. As the plan evolves, they will be located throughout the underground parking. Typically there is one bike stall per bedroom provided as well. Commissioner Carr asked that bike racks be added for non - residents visiting the restaurants as well. Commissioner Carr asked about public art at the front of the building. Mr. Chmielewski responded that is not designated yet, but that can be considered. Commissioner Platteter asked about breaking up the face on the east side and possibly changing the courtyard 90 degrees. Mr. Chmielewski responded that corners for buildings are the most inefficient uses of a building. He discussed why the courtyard was placed as it was in order to achieve the needed density. Mr. Russet added that the current configuration allows for as much sun exposure as possible in as many units as possible. Page 6 of 14 �t(� Ow r Commissioner Platteter asked if pets will be allowed and whether dog - walking areas will be allowed. Mr. Chmielewski responded pets will be allowed; a dog spa will be just off the elevator. You can circle the entire site without crossing any main traffic areas. Commissioner Schroeder asked about parking ratios related to retail. Mr. Chmielewski responded the broker is providing the uses and the ratios, and those requirements have been met since the retail has been shrunk. Commissioner Schroeder noted the sidewalk is right up against the parking lot on York. He said in his opinion ten spaces per thousand is excessive for retail. He suggested eliminating 24 spaces. Continuing, Schroeder stated something that is 60 feet across should be more than just a setback. Concluding Schroder said a reduction in parking, could provide more space on Xerxes. Mr. Chmielewski responded this is something Lennar will look into, especially creating more interest along Xerxes. Retail experts have indicated 100 parking spaces are required for a viable restaurant. With incoming tenants, visitors, and employees, it is down to about 100 spaces. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Debbie Goettel, City of Richfield Mayor, thanked the Commission for consideration of their Richfield neighbors. Goettel stated Richfield has no intention of the Richfield side of Xerxes being medium - density; adding the mid - density reference in the Comprehensive Plan is a Met Council planning tool only. She said this is a residential area, and would like this area to be considered as if it were Edina. Considering, she noted the proposed apartment building will face one - and -a -half story Cape Cod houses and one -story ramblers, and those houses will face decreased sunlight as a result of the building shadows. Goettel concluded that an improvement would be increased setbacks from Xerxes and a reduction to a four -story building. She noted this is a soft border and both Cities need to think about each other as neighbors. Todor Braianova, 6616 Xerxes Avenue S., expressed concerns about traffic increases that will result from the limitations for left turns on York. He asked about the remaining houses left on the Edina side. Dennis Fink, 6713 Xerxes.Avenue S., expressed concern about the height of the building, and reduced sunshine as a result of building shadows. He believes this building looks like South Minneapolis. He does not believe the building is aesthetically pleasing for an area such as this. He also expressed concern about increased traffic. Linda Schnitzen, 6717 Xerxes Avenue S., commented this building does not fit with the character of a residential neighborhood. She expressed concern about the value of her home. She asked the Commission to consider how this would be handled if this were Edina property on the other side of the street. Nancy Bahr, 6620 Xerxes Avenue S., commented there will only be four houses on the west side of Xerxes once the project is completed. She asked about the division with the house next to the building. Todor Braianova, 6616 Xerxes Avenue S., asked how the sidewalks will fit with the street on the west side of Xerxes. He asked about the access to Southdale and the possible addition of a traffic light to help pedestrian traffic. Page 7 of 14 ktl q Nancy Bahr, 6620 Xerxes Avenue S., asked about the remaining four houses and any future plans for them. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Continued Discussion Chair Staunton asked Mr. Richart to address traffic issues brought up by residents. Mr. Richart explained the various thought processes regarding the turning possibilities around the building. He noted most people will go north than south. To south, most vehicles will go to Penn or other major streets. He discussed the traffic volumes in the intersection are too low to warrant a traffic light. He noted a couple other options for pedestrian crossing, with the new apartments at Southdale and at Cub Foods. Commissioner Olsen noted there will be a desire to cross the street there rather than walk down to the light; noting this is a larger discussion Edina has to have. Chair Staunton asked Mr. Chmielewski and Mr. Russet to discuss what was learned on the shadow studies commissioned. Mr. Chmielewski thanked the Commission and Council for pushing Lennar because Lennar desires to be part of both of these communities. The goal is to do the best job possible because this redevelopment opportunity has a lot benefit to both Richfield and Edina; while balancing the issues at hand. However, there is a limit to how far the developer can go before a project is no longer viable. He presented slides on the shadow study which illustrated the impacts on the building and the homes across the street in March, September, and December. There is very minimal difference between the shadows cast from the nearby Cub Foods, which is approximately 2 stories high, and the proposed building. He then discussed neighboring homes, two of whom are in foreclosure and one had a tax lien, which have a far greater negative impact than anything else on neighbors. New residential construction tends to increase neighboring home values. Mr. Chmielewski also discussed the vegetative screening to be done as a barrier between the north pocket park and neighbors. Commissioner Olsen stated she is still struggling with the height of the six -story building and setback from Xerxes Avenue. Commissioner Lee discussed the value of being deliberate in planning towards future possible development specifically in relation to the park plan on the Xerxes corridor as well as the ability to cross York. Planner Teague noted that there was focus on getting sidewalks on both sides of this development, so as the parcels develop, it can ultimately connect people across the street to Southdale. Chair Staunton clarified the two motions before the Council. The Commissioners discussed the proper procedure of rezoning a district as well as approving a PUD. Page 8of14 r Commissioner Carr expressed support for the development. Commissioner Olsen .noted the. project has vastly improved since the initial _sketch, but she is still concerned about the height and look on the Xerxes side. . Commissioner Lee noted this area is a transition from residential to commercial: She believes a little tweaking will make the project doable. Overall, the density and height are probably where they need to be. Commissioner Schroeder noted the transition in use,.between .commercial and resident between York and Xerxes is really.good. He did express concern about the height of the building along Xerxes. Chair Staunton expressed support for the changes made on the Xerxes side, but he suggested the entire building could be pushed further back away from Xerxes to reduce the parking. Planner Teague suggested.the residential pieces'be.rezoned to PCD -3, if the Commission is inclined, so when the applicant comes back for final rezoning, the P,UD could be.eonsidered at that time. The City Attorney could weigh in on the R- I not being eligible for a PUD rezoning.. Commissioner Platteter stated he thinks something further can be done on the Xerxes side. He really likes the rest of the project. Motion Commissioner Carr moved to recommend approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendments, for the subject property, subject to staff findings and subject to staff . conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Chair Staunton noted he would be in favor of the six -story building, though he.thinks it can be pushed back farther from Xerxes. Ayes; Lee, Carr, Platteter, Staunton. slays; Schroeder, Olsen. Abstain; Potts. motion carried. 4 -2' Motion Commissioner Carr moved to recommend approval of Preliminary Rezoning, and Preliminary Development Plans.for the subject property, subject to staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Commissioner Platteter offered a friendly amendment recommending the inclusion of affordable housing. Commissioners Carr and Platteter accepted that amendment. Commissioner Olsen offered a friendly. amendment to include recommendations regarding turn lane as received in an email from Carl Stueve, Hennepin County Commissioners Carr and Platteter accepted that amendment. Page 9 of 14 Chair Staunton called for the vote; amended motion. Ayes; Lee, Carr. Nays; Schroeder, Olsen, Platteter, Staunton. Abstain Potts. Motion failed 2 -4. Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend that the City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plans for the subject property. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Chair Staunton asked Commissions Platteter and Olsen if they had further comments on their rationale for denial. Commissioner Platteter stated he supported the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; however, his vote to deny the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Develop Plan was based on the layout of the project. Chair Staunton called for the vote; Ayes; Schroeder, Olsen, Platteter, Lee, Staunton. Nay; Carr. Abstain; Potts. Motion to deny carried 5 -1. Commissioner B. Site Plan and V MN Planner Presentation to the Council Chambers at 9:45 p.m. Border Foods (Taco Bell). 3210 Sout� dale Circle, Edina, Planner Teague informed the Commi ion that Border Foods Inc. ' proposing to tear down the existing Taco Bell restaurant and rebuild a new ightly smaller Taco Bell t 3210 Southdale Circle. The building would be 1,850 square feet in size. To ac mmodate the pro sal to redevelop the site, the applicant is requesting a Site Plan review and the follow ➢ Parking Setback Variances from 10 to condition is a 3 -foot setback.) ➢ Front Yard Building Setback Variance ➢ Variance for side menu board facing a residential area.) Variances: feet fro he north and south lot line. (Existing to 22 feet. ,ial area. (Existing menu board directly faces In 1985, a parking stall setback variance was ranted to ad parking stalls for what was then a Zantigo Mexican Restaurant. The variance as to match th existing non - conforming setback of three feet. As noted above, a four -foot etback for parking is ow proposed. Planner Teague delivered a power p int presentation to highligh the project. Planner Teague concluded his pr sentation by indicating that staff re ommends the City Council approve the Site Plan with Var' nces for the construction of a new Ta o Bell restaurant at 3210 Southdale Circle. Approval s based on the following findings: . The proposal w Id meet the required standards and ordinances or a Site Plan with the exception of t setback variances. 2. The propose variances are reasonable. The proposed building is s aller than the existing building on a site; the green space setback for the parking stalls would be increased by one - foot from xisting conditions; and the menu board would be moved to the south side of the building an pointed away from the residential area to the east. Page 10 of 14 ab P 2014 Motion carried. Forester Horwath addr sed issues raised during public testimo relating to cost and timing to replant a large tree, potential City li ility if regulating tree placement, d difficult predictability of tree impact. He recommended including th\t�ate Minnesota list of inva ve trees within the ordinance. Mr. Horwath stated his concern relating ount of time enfor ment would require and indicated he had not found tree replacement to concern as prop y owners were not often cutting down significant trees unnecessarily. The Council continued discussion of the men ent and asked questions of Mr. Teague and Mr. Neal. 111 - The:: Council discussed the merits of the neton tree preservation ordinance in terms of clarity of ;definitions, reasonable scope, and gen al tree prote tion standards in addition to preservation rules ! The .- Council expressed support for the c cept of a tree pr ervation ordinance and asked for additional staff input on the most logical metho o preserve the City's t e canopy, whether home additions should be excluded, how to define a b is removal radius, whethe lot size should be a factor in terms of replacement ratios, h/0, t the City's costs, and bouleva replanting strategy. Member Sprague made a motion, sec Member Brindle, tabling con 'deration of Ordinance No. 2014 -06, Amendment to Chapticle III of the City Code, Regarding ree Preservation, to a future Work Session. Ayes: Bennett, Bri le, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PUD REZONING, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LENNAR CORPORATION, 6725 YORK AVENUE AND 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700, AND 6628 XERXES AVENUE — RESOLUTIONS NO. 2014-51 AND 2014 -52 — ADOPTED Mayor Hovland recognized elected Richfield officials who were in attendance. Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the request of Lennar Corporation for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the building height from four stories and 48 feet to six stories and 70 feet; floor area ratio from 1.0 to 1.27; and, reguiding the Land Use Plan for the five single - family homes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. He reported on concerns of Richfield residents on the east side of Xerxes Avenue with the proposed setbacks. It was noted the traffic study concluded the existing roadways and parking could support this project and recommended creating a left turn into the site on York Avenue. Mr. Teague advised that the Planning Commission recommended, on a split vote, approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and denial of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan based on the layout of the project. Mr. Teague indicated the proponent had revised the plans by reducing the size of the retail space; expanding the width of the boulevard along York Avenue, shifting the entire building ten feet to the west; and, creating additional setbacks (eight feet) on the top floor corners of the building facing Xerxes Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, and Preliminary Development Plan per the findings and conditions as outlined in the draft resolutions. If approved, the developer would be required to return for Final Rezoning to PUD; Final Development Plan; and, Ordinance amendment creating the new PUD District. In addition, a City Code amendment would be needed to allow R -1 property to be considered for a PUD. The Council addressed the indication of the Edina Housing Foundation that 20% affordable housing was a trigger for federal money and the Council had expressed interest in pursuing that type of project where funding could be maximized. Ail Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 6, 2014 Proponent Presentation Peter Chmielewski described projects undertaken and managed by Lennar Corporation. Aaron,Russet Roseth', ESG Architects, presented the project, described revisions to the overall scheme, and indicated that from the perspective of urban design and City building perspectives, this project offered an incredible opportunity to redevelop large parking spaces and outdated mall spaces into a viable walkable commercial node. Mr. Chmielewski reviewed past consideration of this project and described revisions made to address concerns raised including those expressed by the Mayor and citizens of Richfield, noting it had pushed this project to the edge of viability. He indicated this project met or exceeded the 12 conditions of the PUD and asked that approval not include Condition 8 requiring 10% affordable housing. _..__ .. _ _..._. _ ........ ........ . The Council asked questions of Mr. asset Roseth and MF. Chnnielpiuski relating to etheF ^Fejer. >.enstru tpd by L r,,..peFatien sands,..,, iRg ,.,,..,peneRtS .,.-,,posed the height of a project he designed, for St. Paul's Grand Avenue and of Mr. Roseth and Mr. Chmielewski relating to landscaping components proposed with this project and setback distances. Mr. Teague stated the six -story Lyndale Garden project had a setback of about 35 feet from the street with the drive aisle and parking spaces creating separation _ ............... _. _ ........ ......__.....__.......... from single -unit residential properties. The six -story Vernon Terrace project had a setback of 35 feet to the lot line. Mr. Teague advised of concerns expressed by Richfield staff and support to shift the building to the west., which for a PCD -3 zoning district adjacent to an R -1 single dwelling unit district required that a six story building be set back twice its height from the nearest lot line of the nearest R -1 property. He stated that the required setback from Edina single dwelling unit properties for the proposed building would be 140 feet; the six -story portion of the building was proposed to be set back 132 feet from the; nearest lot line of the homes across Xerxes Avenue in Richfield. Mr. Knutson advised it was appropriate for the Council to review this request on a preliminary basis and if the rezoning to PUD was -not allowed, it would not be finally rezoned. Mr. Teague described Edina's required setbacks depending on the zoning of the property. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:09 p.m. Public Testimony Richfield Mayor Debbie Goettel, 6700 Portland Avenue South, addressed the Council. Patrick Elliott, 6720 Oliver Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Fran Peterson, 6912 Washburn Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Vivian Baumann, 6913 Xexres Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Kathleen White, 7115 Morgan Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Matt Tietje, 6733 Russell Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Dewayne Sietsema, 6724 Vincent Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Lisa Schwab, 6740 Washburn Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Todor Braianova, 6616 Xerxes Avenue South, Edina, addressed the Council. Bill Blanchard, 6936 Washburn Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 6.2014 Steven Schwab, 6740 Washburn Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Anita Gibson, 6813 Xerxes Avenue South, Richfield, addressed the Council. Joe Hoover, 7627 Harriet Avenue, Richfield, addressed the Council. Frank Lorenz, 7551 York Avenue South, Unit 720, Edina addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Neal addressed tax ramifications to the Richfield School District and indicated if the project was assessed at $25 million, it would yield $530,000 of new property taxes with $200,000 to the City and between $175,000 to $250,000 to the Richfield School District. Mr. met Roseth7 and Mr. Chmielewski addressed issues raised during public testimony relating to impact of vehicle headlight pollution on Xerxes Avenue South, points of building entrance, areas of resident and visitor parking, 100% stormwater management (via tanks and grit chambers), increased permeability, and pedestrian connections between Xerxes and York Avenues. Chuck Rickart, WSB & Associates on behalf of the City of Edina, answered questions of the Council and indicated that Xerxes Avenue was not considered in the traffic study as the proposed plan did not include a point of access on Xerxes Avenue. He also commented on sidewalk and crosswalk locations. Mr. Teague stated the setback was about 105 feet from the edge of the building to the north property line (south edge of the park). Mr. asset Roseth described the finding of the shadow study and impact to five houses across the street. The Council suggested the landscape plan along Xerxes Avenue include a mixture of plantings and tree species. Mr. Teague reviewed the past and current zoning classification of the Wirk Wickes property. The Council acknowledged the height limit west of France Avenue and east of Xerxes Avenue was set at four stories in 2005 -2006 with the creation of the Westin Hotel. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -51, Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Building Height, Floor Area Ratio, and Land Use. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Concern was expressed relating to the proposed setback from properties in Richfield and desire for Edina to be a 'good neighbor' to its bordering communities. The Council discussed the varying heights in this area and benefit of the redevelopment project to improve the streetscape, create connectivity, benefit of using podium height, and positive precedence set for York Avenue. The Council reviewed the considerations made to address the concerns expressed by the City of Richfield and to assure the project fit the neighborhood well. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. The Council asked staff to address the streetscape to assure balance with the widths of the sidewalk, boulevard, and green buffer strip prior to final consideration. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -52, Approving Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 6, 2014 Development Plan for 6725 York Avenue and 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700, and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, as amended to remove Condition 8, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 3 & 25, 2014 and the revised plans submitted to the City Council on May 6, 2014. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of the City Code. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. S. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014. 6. At the time of building permit application, compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the chief building official's memo dated March 27, 2014. 7. Work with staff and Hennepin County to secure a left turn in lane from south bound York Avenue. 9. Ten peFeent (10%) of the housing units shall be designated far- affe-r-d-able housing Spersifer. detaR wa, -lei hp elptPr-minpel at the time of final appFGVah 9. Sustainable design principles must be used. Greater detail shall be provided with the Final Rezoning submittal. 10. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 11. Approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding consideration of R -1 property within a PUD, prior to final rezoning. 12. Final Rezoning is contingent on adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Met Council approval of the Amendment. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VI.0 SITE PLAN WITH MUkTIPLE VARIANCES FOR BORDER FOODS, INC. AT 3210 UTHDALE CIRCLE — RESOLUTION NO. 201 53 — ADOPTED Community Develo ment Direct hr Presentation Mr. Teague presented the propos of Border Foods, Inc. to tear down the fisting Taco Bell Restaurant at 3210 Southdale Circle, and rebuild a lightly smaller building /itions are feet. Mr. Teague advised of the parking setback, front yard bui ing setback, and meplacement variances required to accommodate this project. He reporte the Planning Commimously recommended approval of the site plan and variances subject to t e findings and co detailed in the April 9, 20 14 staff memo. Proponent Presentation Barbara Schneider, representing Border Foods c., stated a permit from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District had already been received. She de ribe the improvements proposed to the Taco Bell site and respectfully requested the Council's app al of the 'te plan and variances. Mayor Hovland opened the public,,la@aring at 11:22 p.m Public Testimony No one appeared to Member Bennett de a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennet rindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 7 D I A d Figure 4.8 2030 Future Land Use Plan Land Use and CommunityFacilities Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4 -15 Land Use and 4 Comm unity Facilities 5- d W 4 -18 Richfield Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential (MDR) The Medium Density Residential land use category was derived from the Single - family Residential —High Density category (R -SFH) that was included in the City's 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The medium density residential category replaces the R -SFH category. Naming this category medium density better clarifies the intent of the residential uses within this category. Medium density residential accommodates attached housing, predominantly townhomes or condominiums ranging from 7 to 12 units per acre. Medium density residential also includes manufactured housing. Medium - High Density Residential (MHD) Medium - High Density Residential includes multi- unit and multi - building developments. The intent is to allow for higher density housing, such. as townhome developments. The allowed densitywould rangefrom 12 to 24 units per acre and no greater than 4 stories tall. MEDN Ilk City Hall ^ Phone 952 - 833 -9520 Fax 952 - 826 -0390 ^ www.CityofEdina.com O \tip U311 �h�t`�k%a • / Date: March 27, 2014 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director cc: Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief From: David Fisher, Chief Building Official Re: 6725 York Ave — Former Wicks Furniture Re- Development Draft Plans Dated March 3, 2014 The Building Department has reviewed the above proposed project with following comments: - Provide a complete building code analysis when the construction plans are submitted to the city for building permits. - All exiting must go to a public way. - Provide adequate fire department access to the buildings. - The building setbacks must comply with the 2006 IBC for exterior wall protection. - Retaining walls over 4 feet require engineering and a building permit. - Provide fire sprinklers to NFPA 13. - Verify fire sprinkler requirements under balconies. - Verify the accessible parking is in compliance with the state building code. - There has been a 30% review with the building & fire department staff for this project. I would recommend that this project continues with the pre - construction meetings with the design, processionals, contractor, the project manager and the city building and fire department staff. Alt City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 el .4 Engineering Department - Phone 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 - www.CityofEdina.com Date: April 2, 2014 Revised May 21, 2014 (After detailed plans were submitted) To: Cary Teague - Community Development Director From: Chad Millner - Director of Engineering Re: 6725 York Ave - Former Wicks Furniture Re- Development Draft Plans Dated March 3, 2014 Plans Dated May 12, 2014 MEMO o e �` Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: • A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with potential other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. • A developer's agreement will be required for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other public improvements. The developer agreement should indicate that the watermain and sanitary sewer mainline are public. o The entire watermain loop with hydrants shall be public and the sanitary sewer trunk pipe up to the terminating manholes before service pipes head into the building shall be public. Indicate on plans what utilities are private versus public by noting that on the pipes. o The City requires utility easements over the public watermain and sanitary sewer pipes. o The agreement should also state that the City is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the watermain and sanitary sewer and in the event that the City needs to excavate for a repair of the system that the City is not responsible for restoring the surface, such as pavements and / or landscaping. • A set of signed as -built plans will be required with the final C.O. o An AutoCAD or GIS shape file shall be submitted to engineering of the public utility pipes as part of the asbuilts. • Staff requires connecting the watermain to the Edina water distribution system. Watermain cannot be connected to both Edina and Richfield distribution systems. • Details are needed on the infiltration system such as. expected infiltration rates. This would be part of the watershed permitting process. • Engineering will indicate where to place the watermain gate - valves. • Construct utilities per City of Edina Standard Details. • Watertight sanitary sewer castings are required on all sanitary sewer manholes. • SAC and WAC fees will be required. • Note the removal of the sidewalk along York Ave. • If an irrigation system is planned, please note where water will be provided from. • Coordinate all connections to watermain and sanitary sewer with Edina Public Works. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. G: \PW\ADMIN \COMM \EXTERNAL \GENERAL CORR BY STREETS \Y Streets\6725 York - Former Wicks Site\201403xx CM -Edina Review 6725 York.doc Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd - Edina, MN 55439 April 9, 2014 City Malnagees 0fBce On April 8, 2014 a joint Work Session of the Richfield City Council and Richfield Planning Commission was held. to discuss the proposed development at 6725 York Avenue South in Edina. I am writing this letter to reflect the discussion that occurred at that meeting. In addition to Richfield's Council Members and Planning Commissioners, Edina City Manager Scott Neal and Metropolitan Council Representative Steve Elkins were present at that meeting. Although Richfield public officials have no formal legal authority to play a role in the consideration of land use applications in the City of Edina, we feel that it Is good public policy and good practice as a neighboring community to allow meaningful impact by an adjoining jurisdiction, especially in a case such as this which is located on a "soft border" between two communities. Richfield policy makers and staff do have a number of concerns as they relate to this proposed development. They are as follows: A height in excess of four to five stories. The existing commercial site is guided for Community Activity Center in Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The maximum height in this area is four stories or 48 feet. The maximum height allowed in the Single Dwelling Unit District is two and a half stories. The proposed six -story building exceeds these allowances and exceeds what the Richfield Comprehensive Plan anticipated for the site. This additional height would adversely affect Richfield homes. A building setback of less than 132 feet from existing single - family lot lines. The proposed setback is significantly less than what Edina requires for PCD -3 District and/or Planned Resident District (PRD) projects when adjacent to R -1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) properties. e The PCD -3 District north of 70th Street requires .a minimum setback from an R -1 property line that is equal to twice the height of the proposed building. In this case that is equal to 132 feet; however, the proposal is for a setback of approximately 104 feet. The PRD District requires a minimum setback from an R -1 property line in accordance with the following calculation: 10(height of building -40) ¢ 80. The total height of The [Ir•hml H011100►rrt 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE. RICHFIELD. MINNESOTA 55423 612.861.9700 FAX: 612.861.9749 VA-V-d %MchraKorg AN EQUAL OPPOWUMW EMPLOYER Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 501" Street Edina, MN 55424 MAYOR DEBBIE GOETTEL Dear Mr. Teague, CITY COUNCIL I am writing in regards to the Public Hearing being held before the Edina Planning PAT ELLI EN TOM FA Commission on April 9, 2014 for Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezonings related GAR IA EDWINA GARCIA to the proposed development at 6725 York Ave. S. p PO p SUZANNE M.SANDAHL I would like this letter to be entered into the public record as it relates to this Public Hearing CITY MANAGER and, if possible, have the following read aloud at the Public Hearing. STEVEN L. DEVICH On April 8, 2014 a joint Work Session of the Richfield City Council and Richfield Planning Commission was held. to discuss the proposed development at 6725 York Avenue South in Edina. I am writing this letter to reflect the discussion that occurred at that meeting. In addition to Richfield's Council Members and Planning Commissioners, Edina City Manager Scott Neal and Metropolitan Council Representative Steve Elkins were present at that meeting. Although Richfield public officials have no formal legal authority to play a role in the consideration of land use applications in the City of Edina, we feel that it Is good public policy and good practice as a neighboring community to allow meaningful impact by an adjoining jurisdiction, especially in a case such as this which is located on a "soft border" between two communities. Richfield policy makers and staff do have a number of concerns as they relate to this proposed development. They are as follows: A height in excess of four to five stories. The existing commercial site is guided for Community Activity Center in Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The maximum height in this area is four stories or 48 feet. The maximum height allowed in the Single Dwelling Unit District is two and a half stories. The proposed six -story building exceeds these allowances and exceeds what the Richfield Comprehensive Plan anticipated for the site. This additional height would adversely affect Richfield homes. A building setback of less than 132 feet from existing single - family lot lines. The proposed setback is significantly less than what Edina requires for PCD -3 District and/or Planned Resident District (PRD) projects when adjacent to R -1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) properties. e The PCD -3 District north of 70th Street requires .a minimum setback from an R -1 property line that is equal to twice the height of the proposed building. In this case that is equal to 132 feet; however, the proposal is for a setback of approximately 104 feet. The PRD District requires a minimum setback from an R -1 property line in accordance with the following calculation: 10(height of building -40) ¢ 80. The total height of The [Ir•hml H011100►rrt 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE. RICHFIELD. MINNESOTA 55423 612.861.9700 FAX: 612.861.9749 VA-V-d %MchraKorg AN EQUAL OPPOWUMW EMPLOYER April 9, 2014 Page 2 the proposed building is approximately 75 feet; however, the maximum height of the portion facing Xerxes Avenue is. approximately 65 feet, The required setback would be between 330 - 423 feet, depending on the number applied. If the building were only 4 stories or 44 feet, the requirement would be for a minimum setback of120.feet. (excessive shadow impacts result from both the building height and its minimal setback. As a response from a- request by'Richfield staff members, Lennar conducted a shadow analysis, This analysis shows that in December, the buildings would begin to cast shade on six to eight Richh6ld,homes sometime between, 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. This impact would be lessened, and possibly eliminated, by reducing the building's. height to four stories an&or increasing the building's setback from Xerxes Avenue. The project seems to have excess retail parking that .would allow for the building(s) to be shifted farther to the west. Architectural Content. The project.will face a block,of one - and -a =half story cape cods and single -story ramblers: The proposed design is not context- sensitive to the period or style of housing in'the adjacent neighborhood. bog hark. The neighborhood has expressed concerns about noise related to a dog park and would prefer passive open space. firmly believe that these are all concerns that Edina residents would have if they were In the same position as those Richfield residents adjacentto the property and, in short, we are asking that you treat Richfield residents concerns with as much validity as if they were your own residents. Sincerely, Debbi4Goe Mayor Copy:. Richfield City Council City Manager Community Development. Director May 2, 2014 City Council On April 8, 2014 a joint Work Session of the Richfield City Council and Richfield Planning Commission was held to discuss the proposed development. In addition to Richfield's Council Members and Planning Commissioners, Edina City Manager Scott Neal and Metropolitan Council Representative Steve Elkins were present at that meeting. On April 9, the Edina Planning Commission recommended denial of Lennar's site plan;-in part because of the negative impacts of the proposed development on Richfield residents. Since that time, the developer has made some very minor adjustments to their plan that do not fully meet the concerns of community leaders and residents in Richfield. Of primary concern are the following: A height in excess of four to five stories. The existing commercial site is guided for Community Activity Center in Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The maximum height in this area is four stories or 48 feet. The maximum height allowed in the Single Dwelling Unit District is two and a half stories. The proposed six -story building exceeds these allowances and exceeds what the. Richfield Comprehensive Plan anticipated for the site. This additional height would adversely affect Richfield homes. A building setback of less.than 140 feet from existing single- family lot lines. The proposed setback less than what Edina requires for PCD =3 District projects when adjacent to R-1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) properties. According to the Edina Planning Commission Report dated April 9, 2014, the PCD -3 District north of 70th Street requires a minimum setback from an R -1 property line that is equal to twice the height of the proposed building. The staff report states that in this case that is equal to 140 feet. While Lennar's most recent revision increases the setback by 10 feet, at. 132 feet it remains short of the City's requirement. . The Urban Hoindmru 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE, RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 612.661.9700 FAX: 612.661.9749 n1w.ra7yoMdfr'd.or9 AN EQUAL OPPOMIM EMIPLOYR Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina . MAYOR 4801 W. 50°1 Street DEBBIE GOETTEL Edina, MN 55424 CITY COUNCIL Dear Mr. Teague, PAT Ei.LIOTT TOM FIT7.HFNRY EDWINAGARCIA I would like this letter to be entered into the public record as it relates to this Public Hearing SUZANNE M. sANDAI IL and, if possible, have the following read aloud at the Public Hearing. CrrY MANAGER I am writing in regards to the Public Hearing being held before the Edina City Council on May STEVEN L. DEVICH g, 2014 for Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezonings related to the proposed development at 6725 York Ave. S. Richfield city officials feel that it is good public policy and good practice as a neighboring community to allow meaningful impact by an adjoining jurisdiction, especialiy in .a case such as this which is located on a "soft border"'between two communities. On April 8, 2014 a joint Work Session of the Richfield City Council and Richfield Planning Commission was held to discuss the proposed development. In addition to Richfield's Council Members and Planning Commissioners, Edina City Manager Scott Neal and Metropolitan Council Representative Steve Elkins were present at that meeting. On April 9, the Edina Planning Commission recommended denial of Lennar's site plan;-in part because of the negative impacts of the proposed development on Richfield residents. Since that time, the developer has made some very minor adjustments to their plan that do not fully meet the concerns of community leaders and residents in Richfield. Of primary concern are the following: A height in excess of four to five stories. The existing commercial site is guided for Community Activity Center in Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The maximum height in this area is four stories or 48 feet. The maximum height allowed in the Single Dwelling Unit District is two and a half stories. The proposed six -story building exceeds these allowances and exceeds what the. Richfield Comprehensive Plan anticipated for the site. This additional height would adversely affect Richfield homes. A building setback of less.than 140 feet from existing single- family lot lines. The proposed setback less than what Edina requires for PCD =3 District projects when adjacent to R-1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) properties. According to the Edina Planning Commission Report dated April 9, 2014, the PCD -3 District north of 70th Street requires a minimum setback from an R -1 property line that is equal to twice the height of the proposed building. The staff report states that in this case that is equal to 140 feet. While Lennar's most recent revision increases the setback by 10 feet, at. 132 feet it remains short of the City's requirement. . The Urban Hoindmru 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE, RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 612.661.9700 FAX: 612.661.9749 n1w.ra7yoMdfr'd.or9 AN EQUAL OPPOMIM EMIPLOYR May 2, 2014 Page. 2 Excessive shadow impacts result from both the building height and its reduced setback. As a response from a request by Richfield staff members, Lennar conducted a shadow analysis. This analysis shows that in December, the buildings would begin to cast shade on six to eight Richfield homes sometime between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. While I appreciate that the developer has increased the Xerxes Avenue setback, this impact would be eliminated by orienting the site's larger building mass toward York Avenue, the major commerciaVartery. Architectural Context. The proje.ct'will face a block of one - and -a - half story cape cods and single -story ramblers. The proposed design is not context- sensitive to the period or style of housing in the adjacent neighborhood, . firmly believe that these are all concerns that Edina residents would have if they were in the same position as those Richfield residents adjacent to the property and, in short, we are asking that you treat Richfield residents' concerns with as much validity as if they were your own residents. Sincerely, Debbie Goettel Mayor Copy: Richfield City Council City Manager Community Development Director To: City Council From: Lisa Schaefer, HR Director Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: 2014 -2015 CITY INSURANCE CONTRACTS Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: May 2014 Company: LMCIT Travelers Insurance Company A, V., •,vvo• .`o 13 I El8 ado / Agenda Item #: VIII. A. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: Amount of Quote or Bid: $942,581 $1,026,370 Recommended Quote or Bid: Staff recommends awarding the property casualty and worker's compensation insurance to LMCIT, including the optional Volunteer Coverage for $1,233 and Bond Coverage for $2,176. General Information: The City requested bids from both Travelers Insurance Company and LMCIT for property /casualty and workers compensation insurance for policy year July I, 2014 —June 30, 2015. As a City -owned joint powers agency, the coverage that LMCIT provides is much broader than under a commercial carrier, so it is difficult to provide a direct comparison of costs and benefits. Members of the Trust also receive dividends based on premiums paid during the city's lifetime membership. As a result, dividends are expected to grow over time with more years of membership. Total Costs. LMCIT has a premium cost advantage of $83,789 over Travelers. However, the deductible structure of LMCIT coverage is different than that of Travelers. With LMCIT, the City would pay a $50,000 deductible per claim, up to an annual maximum of $100,000. After the maximum is reached, additional claims would be $1,000 per occurrence. This blanket deductible covers claims in all categories except Worker's Compensation and Liquor Liability (which have no deductibles). Travelers has a traditional per claim deductible with no maximum deductible amount. When premium costs and estimated deductible amounts are included in the calculation, LMCIT has a $45,352 cost advantage. LMCIT has warned us that the liability portion of the premium will increase approximately $30,000 - $50,000 the second year due to prior acts being covered by Travelers in the first `year. Even with these additional costs, staff believes the long -term advantages of broader coverage and dividend potential warrant the switch to LMCIT. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE ° Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Significant Differences in Coverage. Liability Coverage Limits. LMCIT has NO annual aggregate limits for general, police, management, or employment. The limit is $1.5 million for each and every occurrence. Travelers has the following annual aggregate limits for total claims in each category: $1.5 million for general liability; $1.5 million for police liability, $1 million for management liability, $1 million for employment liability. Non - Monetary claims /Injunctive Relief (EEOC, Land Use, and Special Risk Litigation) Current coverage requires a claim for damages or an agency charge before coverage will begin. Under LMCIT, litigation relating to these types of special risks is covered regardless of whether the litigation includes a claim for damages. LMCIT provides coverage for 5 broad categories of litigation: land use regulation; development; franchising; enterprise operations; city debt obligations. In addition, LMCIT offers incentive programs to further decrease costs. Optional Coverage Recommended. Volunteer Accident. LMCIT provides some protection for City Volunteers (including board and commission members) on a no -fault basis. The annual premium is $1,233 and there is no deductible for this coverage. The City does not currently have this coverage. Bond Coverage. LMCIT provides blanket coverage up to $1 million for all employees. The annual premium is $2,176 and deductibles are included in the Property /Casualty blanket deductible. The City is currently insured through Travelers for up to $250,000 per City employee, for approximately $2,500. Other Advantages. LMCIT has several other advantages. Coordinated Coverage. With LMCIT, there is the opportunity to coordinate with other cities in areas of mutual concern. For example, a number of cities were recently named in a lawsuit related to accessing private data in criminal justice databases, and LMCIT has been able to provide joint defense. Customer Service. Often for - profit insurers are looking to manage costs with less consideration of the citizen or employee relations aspect of the claim. As a result, they are prone to take a more defensive position and deny claims more quickly. Citizens or employees feel that they have to "fight" for coverage. This leads more involvement with attorneys and the legal system, and often more "bad will' between the parties. With employees, this can be particularly damaging since they have often invested a significant amount of their working career with the City and hope to be treated as a valued asset. Training and Workshops. LMCIT works exclusively with' public sector groups, including almost all Minnesota cities. As a result they have several proactive programs and training opportunities that are geared specifically for Minnesota Cities. Additional Coverage Options. The City may eventually be interested in purchasing optional coverage that is not available through a commercial carrier, such as No -Fault Sewer coverage. This type of optional coverage can be started at any time. Attachment • . 2014 -2015 City Insurance Contracts Comparison Chart City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 2014 -2015 City Insurance Contracts LMCIT Travelers Worker's Compensation Premium Deductible' Premium Deductible Administration fees3 $ 3,200 None $ 10,000 $25,000 Property & Equipment $ 148,119 $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 104,273 $50,000 Golf Dome Mobile Equipment $ 23,037 $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 20,506 $1000 Auto Liability & UM $ 31,224 $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $' 80,681 None Auto Physical Damage $ 14,607 $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 20,816 $1000 General Liability $ 179,148 $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 84,631 None Employment Practices Included $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 26,040 $25,000 Law Enforcement Included $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 73,385 $10,000 Public Management Included $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 15,559 $10,000 Cyber Liability Included $50,000/$100,000 /$1000 $ 17,536 $10,000 Liquor Liability $ 26,327 None $ 9,172 None Total Premiums P/C Premiums $ 422,462 1 $ 452,599 Add'[ cost for Travelers = + $ 30,137 Worker's Compensation $ 516,919 None $ 563,771 None Administration fees3 $ 3,200 None $ 10,000 None Total W/C Premium $ 520,119 $ 573,771 Add'I cost for Travelers = + $ 53,652' Total Package Premium $ 942,581 $ 1,026,370 Add'I cost for Travelers = $ 83,789 Estimated Dividende ($4,500) Estimated Deductibles5 $ 81,375 $ 38,438 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $ 1,019,456 $ 1,064,808 Add'I cost for Travelers = + $ 45,352 1 LMCIT Deductibles are $50,000 per claim with an aggregate limit of $100,000. Once the aggregate limit is reached deductibles are $1000. 2LMCIT has indicated an estimated premium increase of 30 -50k for the 2015 renewal; the first year is discounted because prior acts are covered first through Travelers. 3The City is responible for paying the direct costs on several claims because the City was covered by Home Insurance which went bankrupt. The administration and billing is currently handled by Travelers. °LMCIT is a member -owned organziation and members are eligible to receive dividends. If approved by the LMCIT trustees, individual member dividends are based on total premiums and adjusted losses throughout the time as a member. As a result, dividends are expected to grow over time. As an example, Eden Prairie's 2013 dividend was $104,217. 5Based on the average annual deductible the City would have paid under each proposal using the last five years of loss history. The deductibles under Travelers proposals would have ranged from $10,000 - $72,720. Deductibles under LMCIT would have,been $37,116 - $127,029. Detail on following page. 2014 -2015 City Insurance Contracts Significant Differences_in Coverage LMCIT TRAVELERS Liability Limits . LMCIT has NO annual aggregate limits,for Travelers has the following annual aggregate limits general, police, management, or for total claims in each category: $1.5 million for employment. The limit is $1.5 million for general liability; $1.5 million for police liability, $1 each and every occurrence. million for management liability, $1 million for employment liability. Coverage for Non - monetary Claims LMCIT will provide coverage for non- Traveler's excludes most injunctive or non - monetary monetary orinjunctive claims such as land claims from coverage.. use, eminent domain, and EEOC claims . Additional Coverage through LMCIT recommended by Staff at this time. Premium Deductible Volunteer Coverage $ 1,233 NONE This option provides limited coverage for city volunteers, including advisory boards and commission members, who are injured while: working for the City. Bond Coverage $ 2,176 Applied to P/C deductibles This option provides$1 million in bond coverage for all City staff. ist Deductible Amounts Under Current Proposals DVERAGE YEAR LMCIT Travelers )12-2013 $76,197 $43,237 )11-2012. $112,726 $53;878 )10-2011 $127,029 $72,720 )09-2010 $37,116 $10,000 )08-2009 $53,809 $12,580 - Year average .. ,.... ,$81,375 $38;483 9 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda-Item #: VIII. B. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Issuing Request for Interest for Development Partner — 5146 Eden Avenue (Former Edina Public Works Site) Action Requested: Authorize City staff to issue the Request for Interest for Development Partner and conclude the work of the Grandview Community Advisory Team. Information / Background: In 2010 -12, the City commissioned a Small Area Guide Plan and a Development Framework to define goals and community vision for the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue and the surrounding GrandView District. Advisory teams of Edina residents and GrandView business owners led these efforts. This work culminated in the Development Framework which was unanimously adopted by the City Council in April 2012. The Framework generally describes a catalytic new project for the site that sets the tone for future development throughout GrandView. More specifically, the Framework envisions a mix of uses that include complementary public and private elements. Indoor and outdoor public spaces are prominently featured. It is anticipated that the private elements will help offset the costs of the public elements. In April 2013, the City Council discussed various strategies to implement the Framework and selected the . Request for Interest (RFI) process to find a suitable development partner. A new GrandView Community Advisory Team (CAT) was convened and met regularly to discuss a variety of topics about the RFI an implementation of the Development Framework. Some concerns were raised about engaging a development partner and satisfying community needs. The CAT provided important direction to staff in the preparation of a Community Facilities Inventory and Resident Survey regarding re -use of the site. In March 2014, the CAT submitted two versions of a RFI document. The first, which was supported by a majority of the CAT members called for a Consultant to further refine plans for the site. The second version, called for a Development Partner to prepare alternatives for the site that included financial feasibility and market viability. Recognizing the valuable contribution by the ten members of the Community Advisory Team, their task is completed and their role can now be concluded. Staff has finalized the RFI for Development Partner based on the direction given at the May 20, 2014 work session. The CAT document served as the basis for the RFI. Areas that were vague were refined by staff based on best industry practices. City of Edina. • 4801 W. 50th St - Edina, MN 55424 Staff intends to promote this site through a variety of channels to solicit the best possible response. The RFI will be distributed through Finance & Commerce, Urban Land Institute — Minnesota, American Planning Association - Minnesota, Economic Development Association of Minnesota, MNCAR Exchange and directly to developers, planners and consultants who have expressed interest in the GrandView District. The draft Request for Interest (RFI) for Development Partner is attached for full consideration by the City Council. Staff recommends that this RFI be issued so that alternatives for the site can be fully explored Attachments: Request for Interest for Development Partner v 1, City of Edina, Minnesota r J GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner The City of Edina has a rich history of innovative developments that have become national models for public /private partnerships. We are looking for a development partner to collaborate with us to create Edina's next great neighborhood amenity. Objective The City of Edina is seeking a partner with real estate development expertise and experience to collaborate in implementing the GrandView District Development Framework. As Phase I in the implementation process, this partner will work with the City to determine public and private uses on a vacant 3.3 -acre parcel (the former Public Works site) in the center of the District and then potentially design and construct the structure(s) that house those uses. The School Bus Garage at 5220 Eden Avenue is potentially Phase 2 in the redevelopment process. This parcel is wholly owned by Edina Independent School District 273. Any redevelopment planning for this parcel will take place in partnership with District 273 in a separate process unrelated to this Request for Interest. It is important to the City that all sites be developed in a manner that innovatively responds to the needs of the community and is successful in the marketplace. Background In 2010, the City initiated a community -based small area guide plan process for the GrandView District, led by residents, business and property owners, including a volunteer team of architects, landscape architects, and urban planners (all Edina residents). The innovative, collaborative and intensive process (10 meetings in 20 days) resulted in the unanimous approval of seven Guiding Principles for redevelopment of the GrandView District: DRAFT for City Council Review GrandView Guiding Principles 1. Leverage publicly -owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. - 2. Enhance the District's economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. 4. Design for the present and future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life - filled place. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina's innovative development heritage. In April of 2012, with the help of a $100,000. Met Council Livable Communities grant, the City completed the second citizen -led phase of the process resulting in the unanimous City Council adoption of the GrandView District Development Framework. The Framework (available at www.edinamn.gov) provides a vision for how to bring the Guiding Principles to life. In the GrandView District, the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, add value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. This amenity, the GrandView Commons, is envisioned to include a community building, public green, and new street (GrandView Crossing). Additional elements potentially envisioned for the site include a Metro Transit park and ride and possibly multi - family housing. In keeping with the spirit of . the Framework, all uses must provide for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and adhere to best practices with regard to environmental sustainability. In addition, development must consider and should preserve future transit use of the adjoining rail line. Additional visions for the site and the district is found in the Framework. City of Edina, Minnesota June 17, 2014 RFI for Development Partner DRAFT for City Council Review Page 2 Collaborative Process The City anticipates a multi -stage process to collaborate with a potential Development Partner to achieve the vision outlined for the former Public Works site in the Framework. g pff%ow @GUGgffim Outcome: City announces partner The City will review letters of interest and select prospective partners to interview. After conducting interviews on September 2, 2014, the City will on September 16, select a "tentative" Development Partner. 2014. N8 ' . Outcome: Parties enter into a formal _gNm The City and the Development Partner will work together to create a transparent and engaging process to identify feasible alternatives to re -use and agreement to redevelop the vacant site. This process will include extensive public input, execute the process including City commissions, stakeholder groups, neighbors and the general on November 18, public. Additional planning/market studies and obligations of each party will be 2014. identified. Milestones and deadlines will be established. These alternatives • - 0 0. Outcome: Development The Development Partner and the City will collaborate to generate alternative scenarios for development that align with the goals of the Framework and the Partner will deliver needs of the community and the marketplace. Each scenario will demonstrate 2-4 alternatives for all aspects of project feasibility, including but not limited to: the re -use of the site • General development plan that indicates public and private uses, by March 31, 2015. approximate building size and height, outdoor open spaces, circulation These alternatives patterns within and adjacent to the site and any off -site infrastructure will be forwarded to requirements; City Council on • Economic model / pro -forma that demonstrates the financial feasibility April 7, 2015. including revenues and expenses for both capital construction and long -term operations; and • Phasing plan that summarizes the timing and sequencing of the public and private elements at the site. • Outcome: Summary provided Each of the alternative scenarios will be made available to the public for evaluation and feedback. Public input and opinions will be collected and to Council on May summarized to help inform the City Council. 19, 2015. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest.. City of Edina, Minnesota June 17, 2014 RFI for Development Partner DRAFT for City Council Review Page 3 Outcome: City selects preferred The City Council will determine which of the alternative scenarios, if any, is in the best interests of the community. After selection, the City and the scenario on June 2, Development Partner will enter into an exclusive partnership and negotiate full 2015 and authorizes terms of a Redevelopment Agreement under which the preferred scenario will execution with the be executed. Development Partner. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest.. City of Edina, Minnesota June 17, 2014 RFI for Development Partner DRAFT for City Council Review Page 3 Submission Requirements Interested entities (whether an individual, company, or team) should submit a Letter of Interest that includes the following information: 1) Name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address of the primary contact person; 2) The names and professional backgrounds of all team members who are integral to the project; 3) A general statement of why the team is interested in this opportunity, including the team perspective of the community vision outlined in the Grandview Development Framework and preliminary thoughts on how development of the site can : serve as a catalyst for private development of the surrounding parts of the District; 4). Three examples of experiences with the one or more of the following attributes: civic /community uses, mixture of public and private uses, public /private partnerships, multi - modal transportation elements, environmental sustainability or innovate project financing; 5) Two examples of projects shaped with extensive public input; 6) Preliminary work plan that outlines the critical elements and milestones anticipated when working with the City to advance from "vision" to "reality"; and 7) Any.other information that is critical to the City's ability to evaluate the merits of the team. Respondents are encouraged to be thorough, yet concise. References to online project examples are encouraged. Letters'of Interest must be limited to 10- pages. Submission is due by 4:30pm on Monday, August "I.I;;, 2014. The Letter of Interest must be submitted in electronic format with 10 printed hard copies delivered to: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager bneuendorf(cDedinamn.gov Selection All complete submittals received prior to the deadline will be evaluated by an ad -hoc selection team .comprised of City staff .likely to be engaged in the development planning process. Submittals will be evaluated on past experience, professional capabilities and ability to collaboratively--,work in partnership with .the City to successfully create innovative development alternatives for .the site. The City wi11 determine which responders, if any, will be invited to interview. Selected responders will be invited to give in- person presentations to the City Council on Tuesday September 2, 2014,at 5:00 PM. Based on the Letter of Interest and in- person interviews, the City Council anticipates selecting a "tentative development partner" to explore the feasible alternatives for the site on September 16, 2014. Development planning is anticipated to begin immediately thereafter. City of Edina, Minnesota June 17, 2014 RFI for Development Partner DRAFT for City Council Review Page 4 Terms This is a request for Letters of Interest and in no way obligates the responder to enter into a relationship with the City. Nor does this request obligate the City to enter into a relationship with any entity that responds, nor does it limit or restrict the City's right to enter into a relationship with any entity that does not respond to this request. In its sole discretion, the City may pursue discussions with one or more entities responding to this request, or none at all. The City further reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to cancel this Request for Letters of Interest at any time for any reason. All costs associated with responding to this request will be solely at the responder's expense. Additional Information In addition to the Development Framework, the City has commissioned several studies that may inform the response to this Request for Interest. These documents include: environmental studies, Community Facility Inventory, Edina Resident Survey and preliminary traffic and underground infrastructure studies. A finding of TIF eligibility was also completed for the site. These documents are available at http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php? section= planning�GrandViewUpdate. Questions about this Request for Interest can be directed to Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager at 952 - 826 -0407 or bneuendorf@edinamn.gov. ti .°• City of Edina, Minnesota June 17, 2014 RFI for Development Partner DRAFT for City Council Review Page 5 91N��1 .rL. ' e \COReB K�9 • To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. C. From: Ross Bintner, P.E., Environmental Engineer Action ❑ Discussion Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Flood Protection and Clean Water Improvement Study Update Action Requested: No specific action requested. Provide input or direction on project recommendations. Information / Background: This report summarizes the findings of Part I and Part 2 of the 2014 Flood Protection and Clean Water Improvement Study, Improvement Number STS -406. This study provides preliminary engineering and stormwater planning for six project areas to help solve flooding and water pollution issues designated in the City of Edina 2011 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan ( CWRMP). This assembly of projects includes those CWRMP priority items intended for study in the ENG -13 -01 1 flood protection and clean water improvement project, and those that synchronize well with existing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project priorities in the ENG -13 -004 neighborhood reconstruction program. Systems Understanding In addition to the specific project recommendations summarized in the section below, this study expands the understanding of water resource systems in the City of Edina and emphasizes the connection of land use management, surface water resources, and the sanitary and stormwater utilities. The following is a summary to provide context to the report. Updated science to inform flood risk assessment: • The intensity of I% and 2% annual probability storms has increase in the last decades. The I% and 2% events were previously defined as a 6.0 inch and 5.4 inch 24 hour storm. The updated National Weather Service "Atlas 14" document now defines the I% and 2% probability event as a 7.5 inch and 6.4 inch 24 hour storm, a 20 -25% increase. • The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) has also been studying this issue with a soon to be released Stormwater Adaptation Study. • Future infrastructure projects will be larger, and cost more due to this effective change in standard. • For more detail review Part 1, Section 2.1 Storm water utility flood protection and clean water service levels: Significant portions on the City of Edina stormwater system do not meet the 10% probability (10 year) level of service and I% probability (100 year) level of protection defined in Comprehensive Water Resources Master Plan ( CWRMP) policy. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 While system improvements made during neighborhood reconstruction continues annually, the Atlas 14 updated understanding of risk, meaning even some newly rebuilt systems fail to meet the desired level of service and level of protection. Some areas of the City have entrenched flood and drainage issues. These issues may have a technically feasible solution, but are politically or economically imprudent to solve with an infrastructure project approach. The overlap between solving flood issues and providing new clean water treatment is very narrow: low impact development (LID) techniques and Living Streets can provide new clean water treatment, but only play a small role in reducing flood risk. Sanitary sewer system infiltration and inflow: • The connection between extended wet periods, the resulting high groundwater table and infiltration into sanitary pipes has been well established. Effective foundation drains and working sump pumps are the best protection for both private property and the public sanitary system. • This study reiterates the need for effective engineering oversight and standards during the development review process to raise redeveloping buildings out of regional and local flood zones to reduce the potential for structure damage and stormwater inflow into the sanitary system. • Current zoning standards relating to building floor elevation change and requiring a basement are sometimes in conflict with desired floor elevations to meet flood risk standards. Impacts of residential redevelopment: • Increased impervious surface cover causes increased runoff volume. • That increased runoff volume has minimal impact on flood elevations in large events, but can have a major effect on runoff depth and nuisance drainage in small storm events. • While the Atlas 14 rainfall for the 10% probability, 10 -year event is essentially unchanged, the increase in directly connected impervious surface due to redevelopment will result in 20% increase in runoff depth. • For more detail, review Part I, Section 4.3.1. Project Recommendations Below is a summary of management options for both short term (ST) (ex: capital projects, programmatic efforts) and long term (LT) (ex: manage redevelopment to bring buildings out of floodplain.) Project area I General: Part I, Section 3 — Highway 62, East of Highway 100. • ST: Modify Swimming Pool Pond outlet in coordination with 2015 aquatic center parking lot rehabilitation. Project area IA: Part I, Section 3.1 - West 64th between Ashcroft and St. Johns. • ST: Communicate flood risk and offer technical and financial assistance to private property owners to flood proof structures. • LT: Coordinate with MnDOT to upsize pipe crossing HWY 62 at time of major maintenance or expansion. Project area I B: Part 1, Section 3.2 — Barrie Road • ST: Minimal potential for structure damage, no action recommended. • LT: Partner with the watershed district to create a development standard overlay to require additional flood storage and consider providing financial assistance with oversizing at time of redevelopment. • LT: Monitor area for sanitary inflow potential due to overtopping of flood flows into parking garage structures. Project area I C: Part 1, Section 3.2 — York Avenue Pond • ST: Communicate flood risk and offer technical and financial assistance to private property owners to flood proof structures. r I REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 • LT: Partner with the watershed district to create a development standard overlay to require additional flood storage and consider providing financial assistance with stormwater system oversizing at time of redevelopment. Project area 3: Part 1, Section 4 — Chowen and 60th • ST: Televise sanitary sewer during wet weather for potential cross connections. • ST: Verify flood risk at Ewing emergency outflow (EOF), communicate flood risk, and get community feedback on potential solutions during 2016 Strachauer Park A neighborhood reconstruction program meetings. • LT: Alternative I, No action, and redevelopment approach to raise homes out of flood zone. • LT. Alternative 2, Include pipe option D in 2018 Chowen Park A and B, and 60th Street West neighborhood project. Project area 4: Part 2, Section 3 — Cahill Road and Dewey Road • ST: Verify sanitary inflow potential. • ST: Communicate flood risk and offer technical and financial assistance to private property owners to flood proof structures. Project area 5: Part 2, Section 4 — Sally Lane and Paiute Pass • ST: Include pipe option A in 2014 Valley View Road project. • LT: Upsize pipe option A in 2014, or construct options B or C overflows at time of as -yet- unscheduled neighborhood street reconstruction. Project area 7: Part I, Section 5 — Low area between France and Scott Terrace • ST: Communicate flood risk and offer technical and financial assistance to private property owners to flood proof structures. • LT: No action, and redevelopment approach to raise home out of flood zone. A variety of project recommendations to be incorporated into upcoming proiects STS -406 Neighborhood CWRMP Project Implementation Estimated Project Priority # Cost Area I Southdale B, E-1, E -10, E- 2015 Swimming Pool Pond Outlet $200,000 Concord A, B 14, C -21, C- 2015 Building Flood Proofing $15,000 Strachauer Park B 31 3 Chowen Park, E -4, C -27 LT Alt 1: $0 Strachauer Park LT Alt 2: 2018 Chowen Park B $828,743 4 Cahill E -6 2015 Building Flood Proofing $50,000 5 Indian Trails E -7, E -8 2014 Valley View Road $275,000 7 Morningside B C -23 2015 Building Flood Proofing $7,500 8 Morningside A, E -16 This project area is currently being TBD White Oaks A, B, monitored for water elevations and C infiltration rate and will be the focus of Part 3 scheduled for completion before December 31, 2014. A portion of this project could be completed as part of the 2016 White Oaks C, Morningside A neighborhood reconstruction project. Attachments: STS -406 Improvement Project Part 1, Study Area 1, 3, 7 Report STS -406 Improvement Project Part 2, Study Area 4, 5 Report G: \PW \---EM7rAL SVC:S \EI•IG DIV \PROJE,;TS \IMP.? NOS \STS406 2013 -14 Flood Prot d.N/aler Irnpr \ADMIN \140617 ENG -13-011 Project Update.doc: STS -406 Improvement Project Part 1: Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 Prepared for City of Edina February 17, 2014 STS -406 Improvement Project Part 1: Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 Prepared for City of Edina February 17, 2014 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 -4803 Phone: 952.832.2600 Fax: 952.832.2601 ii! STS -406 Improvement Project Part 1: Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 February 17, 2014 Contents 1.0 Project Background ................................................................................................................................... ..............................1 2.0 Project Approach ....................................................................................................................................... ..............................2 2.1 Flood Protection ............................................................................................................................ ..............................2 2.1.1 Changes to Published Precipitation Depths .................................. ............................... 2 2.1.2 Updated Elevation Data ................................................................ ............................... 3 2.2 Water Quality Improvement ..................................................................................................... ..............................3 3.0 Project Area 1: North Cornelia Subwatersheds .............................................................................. ..............................4 3.1 Ashcroft Lane Area (Subwatersheds NC_26 and NC_ 40) ............................................... ..............................4 3.1.1 Problem Description ....................................................................... ..............................4 3.1.2 Existing Conditions Flood Risk ....................................................... ............................... 4 3.1.3 Improvement Options ................................................................... ............................... 5 3.1.4 Engineer's Opinions of Probable Costs ......................................... ............................... 7 3.2 Barrie Road and,York Avenue Area (Subwatersheds NC_86, NC-88, NC-97, NC-99) ......................8 3.2.1 Problem Description ...................................................................... ............................... 8 3.2.2 Model Updates .............................................................................. ............................... 9 3.2.3 Existing Conditions Flood Risk ....................................................... ............................... 9 3.2.4 Improvement Options ................................................................... .............................11 3.2.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs ........................................... .............................14 4.0 Project Area 3: Lake Pamela Subwatersheds LP-24 and LP-27 ............................................... .............................16 4.1 Problem Description .................................................................................................................... .............................16 4.2 Model Updates .............................................................................................................................. .............................16 4.3 Existing Conditions Flood Risk ................................................................................................ .............................17 4.3.1 Residential Redevelopment ........................................................ ............................... 18 4.4 Improvement Options ................................................................................................................ .............................20 4.4.1 Flood Benefits .............................................................................. ............................... 22 4.4.2 Water Quality Benefits ................................................................ ............................... 24 4.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs ................................................................................. .............................24 P: \Mpls \23 MN \27 \2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1 3_7.docx i 5.0 Project Area 7 Morningside Subwatershed MS-17 ..................................................................... .............................26 5.1 Problem Description .................................................................................................................... .............................26 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ModelUpdates .............................................................................................................................. .............................26 ExistingConditions Flood Risks .............................................................................................. .............................26 ImprovementOptions ................................................................................................................ .............................27 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs ................................................................................. .............................27 P: \Mpls \23 MM27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3 7.docx List of Tables Table 2 -1 24 -hour duration rainfall depths using NOAA Atlas 14 for Edina, MN for a range of storm Table 4 -2 Comparison of flood volumes in Subwatershed LP-27 for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event under varying residential redevelopment scenarios ........................................ .............................18 Table 4 -3 Comparison of runoff depths from a residential Subwatershed (LP _20) with B soils under varying directly- connected imperviousness (DCI) scenarios and precipitation frequencies ..... 19 Table 4 -4 Proposed pipe size increases for Option D in Project Area 3 (West 60th Street and ChowenAvenue) ......................................................................................................................... .............................22 Table 4 -5 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP-24 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated atthat corresponding elevation ........................................................................................... .............................22 Table 4 -6 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP-27 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated atthat corresponding elevation ........................................................................................... .............................23 Table 4 -7 100 -year peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Project Area 3 improvement OptionsA, B, C, and D .............................................................................................................. .............................24 Table 4 -8 Estimated costs for West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue (Project Area 3) improvement OptionsA, B, C, D and buy -out option .............................................................................. .............................25 Table 5 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) in Subwatershed MS-17 and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation ........26 Table 5 -2 Estimated costs for Scott Terrace and France Avenue (Project Area 7) improvement optionand buy -out option .................................................................................................... .............................28 P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \workFiles \2013 \STS 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx recurrenceintervals .................................................................................................................... ..............................3 Table 3 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions in Subwatershed NC_40 and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation ........................................................................ ..............................5 Table 3 -2 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) at NC-40 under proposed conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that correspondingelevation ........................................................................................................... ..............................7 Table 3 -3 100 -year peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Ashcroft Lane improvement OptionsA, B, and C ..................................................................................................................... ..............................7 Table 3 -4 Estimated costs for Ashcroft Lane (Project Area 1) improvement Options A, B, C and buy- outoption ....................................................................................................................................... ..............................8 Table 3 -5 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions at Barrie Road (NC_86) and York Pond (NC _88) and the impact to structures at that corresponding elevation......................................................................................................................................... .............................10 Table 4 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions at the Chowen Avenue backyard depression area (LP_24) and West 60th street and Chowen Avenue intersection (LP _27) and the number of dwellings/ garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation ............................................................. .............................17 Table 4 -2 Comparison of flood volumes in Subwatershed LP-27 for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event under varying residential redevelopment scenarios ........................................ .............................18 Table 4 -3 Comparison of runoff depths from a residential Subwatershed (LP _20) with B soils under varying directly- connected imperviousness (DCI) scenarios and precipitation frequencies ..... 19 Table 4 -4 Proposed pipe size increases for Option D in Project Area 3 (West 60th Street and ChowenAvenue) ......................................................................................................................... .............................22 Table 4 -5 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP-24 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated atthat corresponding elevation ........................................................................................... .............................22 Table 4 -6 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP-27 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated atthat corresponding elevation ........................................................................................... .............................23 Table 4 -7 100 -year peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Project Area 3 improvement OptionsA, B, C, and D .............................................................................................................. .............................24 Table 4 -8 Estimated costs for West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue (Project Area 3) improvement OptionsA, B, C, D and buy -out option .............................................................................. .............................25 Table 5 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) in Subwatershed MS-17 and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation ........26 Table 5 -2 Estimated costs for Scott Terrace and France Avenue (Project Area 7) improvement optionand buy -out option .................................................................................................... .............................28 P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \workFiles \2013 \STS 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx List of Embedded Figures Figure 2 -1 Atlas 14 percent of change in precipitation depth for the 24 -hour duration storm, as comparedto TP 40 ..................................................................................................................... ..............................2 Figure 4 -4 Conceptual drawing of Option A, right -of -way infiltration swales for Project Area 3 street reconstructionareas .................................................................................................................. .............................21 List of Attached Figures Figure 1 -1 Project Study Areas Figure 3 -1 Existing Conditions 100 -Year Inundation, Project Area 1— Ashcroft Lane Figure 3 -2 Annual Flood Risk, Project Area 1— Ashcroft Lane Figure 3 -3 Chance of Flooding over a Typical 30 -Year Home Mortgage, Project Area 1— Ashcroft Lane Figure 3 -4 Proposed Improvement Option A, Project Area 1— Ashcroft Lane Figure 3 -5 Proposed Improvement Option B, Project Area 1— Ashcroft Lane Figure 3 -6 Proposed Improvement Option C, Project Area 1— Ashcroft Lane Figure 3 -7 Existing Conditions 100 -Year Inundation, Project Area 1— Barrie Road and York Ave Figure 3 -8 Annual Flood Risk, Project Area 1— Barrie Road and York Ave Figure 3 -9 Chance of Flooding over a Typical 30 -Year Home Mortgage, Project Area 1— Barrie Road and York Ave Figure 3 -10 Proposed Improvement Option A, Project Area 1— Barrie Road and York Ave Figure 3 -11 Proposed Improvement Option B, Project Area 1— Barrie Road and York Ave Figure 3 -12 Proposed Improvement Option C, Project Area 1— Barrie Road and York Ave Figure 4 -1 Existing Conditions 100 -Year Inundation, Project Area 3 -6011 Street and Chowen Ave. Figure 4 -2 Annual Flood Risk, Project Area 3 -60th Street and Chowen Ave. Figure 4 -3 Chance of Flooding over a Typical 30 -Year Mortgage, Project Area 3 -60th Street and Chowen Ave. Figure 4 -5 Proposed Improvement Options A and B, Project Area —6011 St and Chowen Ave Figure 4 -6 Proposed Improvement Option C, Project Area 3 -601h St and Chowen Ave Figure 4 -7 Proposed Improvement Option D, Project Area 3 -60th St and Chowen Ave Figure 5 -1 Existing Conditions 100 -Year Inundation, Project Area 7— France Avenue and Scott Terrace Figure 5 -2 Proposed Improvement Option A, Project Area 7, France Ave and Scott Terrace P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS- 406_FinalReport- PAs- 1- 3 -7.doa iv List of Appendices Appendix A Cost Estimates — Project Area 1, Ashcroft Lane Appendix B Cost Estimates — Project Area 1, Barrie Road and York Avenue Appendix C Cost Estimates — Project Area 3, West 601' Street and Chowen Avenue Appendix D Cost Estimates — Project Area 7, France Avenue and Scott Terrace P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7 \STS_406_FinalReport PAs_1_3_7.docx 1.0 Project Background The City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) was developed to address current and future stormwater issues, especially those related to future development and redevelopment. The plan addresses stormwater runoff management and flood control, water quality management, and wetlands protection through establishment of stormwater planning policies and recommendations. This plan serves as a master plan for the City's water resources management and storm drainage system improvements. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan ( CWRMP) is to provide stormwater runoff management and flood control. The CWRMP establishes design criteria for the City's preferred level of service for stormwater management and level of protection from flooding provided to residents of the city. These design criteria serve as a target for the City as redevelopment occurs and infrastructure improvements are considered. Another goal of the CWRMP is to provide water quality management for the water bodies throughout the city. Water quality management policies and design standards have also been established to protect the water quality of the waterbodies within the city. The CWRMP identifies several areas throughout the city where the desired 100 -year level of flood protection may not currently be provided, based on results of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analyses conducted as part of the CWRMP development. Since identification of these areas, the City has been evaluating flood improvement options on a case -by -case basis, in conjunction with nearby street reconstruction or other improvement projects. The STS -406 Improvement Project includes a detailed evaluation of several areas with high flood potential that correspond to anticipated street reconstruction projects within the upcoming 5 years. This report summarizes our flood protection analyses and conclusions for the following project areas within the STS -406 Improvement Project: (1) Project Area 1 a. Ashcroft Lane b. Barrie Road and York Avenue (2) Project Area 3 a. West 601 Street and Chowen Avenue (3) Project Area 7 a. France Avenue and Scott Terrace Locations of Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 are shown in Figure 1 -1. All elevations included in this report reflect Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations in feet using the NGVD 29 vertical datum. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27 \2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS 406\Final ReportsWroject Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1- 3_7.docx 2.0 Project Approach 2.1 Flood Protection Detailed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the flood areas within Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 was conducted using the XP -SWMM models that were originally developed in 2003 as part of the CWRMP. Updates made to the models as part of this project are described below and within the subsequent sections of this report. 2.1.1 Changes to Published Precipitation Depths In 2013, NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) published new precipitation frequency estimates ( "Atlas 14 ") for the state of Minnesota and other Midwestern states. The Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates, which are the estimated rainfall depths for various rainfall durations and exceedance probabilities, replace the precipitation estimates published in Technical Paper No. 40 Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States ( "TP 40 "). The Atlas 14 rainfall frequency estimates indicate a significant increase in the depth of the 50 -year and 100 -year frequency rainfall events (i.e., rainfall events with exceedance probabilities of 2% and 1 %, respectively) across Minnesota and neighboring states, as compared with TP 40 estimates. For the Minneapolis /St. Paul area, the increases in 24 -hour duration precipitation depths over TP 40 are as high 25% (Figure 2 -1). These precipitation depth increases are of concern, as they can have serious implications for how stormwater systems are designed and managed. — l Mlnneapolls /St. Paul (Frequency) (%Change) C-aL 2 0 f 5 •3 lr _. 10 0 50 21 100 25 Figure 2 -1 Atlas 14 percent of change in precipitation depth for the 24 -hour duration storm, as compared to TP 40 The hydrologic and hydraulic modeling conducted for and summarized in the CWRMP used a 24 -hour rainfall depth of 6.0 inches based on TP 40, and the SCS Type II nested distribution. For this project, the rainfall depths used in the models were updated based on Atlas 14 precipitation estimates for Edina (Table 2 -1). A nested rainfall distribution was developed using precipitation frequency estimates for Edina (Coordinates: 44.8716, - 93.3762). The depth- duration data were downloaded from NOAA's Precipitation Frequency Data Server (PFDS) at http: / /dipper.nws.noaa.goy /hdsc /pfds /. Nested distributions for selected P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.doa 2 recurrence intervals events were created by using the Frequency Storm utility found in the meteorological modeling component of HEC -HMS to produce 24 -hour hyetographs with 5- minute intervals. Flood frequency data is often also described in terms of a percentage of risk, or annual exceedance probability. For example, the 100 -year frequency flood inundation area represents an area that has a 1 percent chance of flooding (1- percent - annual chance flood) for any given year. Structures located within the 1- percent - annual chance flood inundation area have a 26 percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30 -year mortgage. Table 2 -1 24 -hour duration rainfall depths using NOAA Atlas 14 for Edina, MN for a range of storm recurrence intervals Storm Recurrence Interval 24 -hour Rainfall Depth (inches) Annual Exceedance Probability' 1 -year 2.5 100% 2-year 2.9 50% 10 -year 4.3 10% 25 -year 5.4 4% 50 -year 6.4 2% 100 -year 7.5 1% Annual Exceedonce Probability refers to the percent chance of occurrence in any given year 2.1.2 Updated Elevation Data For each of the study areas, City staff conducted a topographic field survey of the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The topographic survey data was combined with 2011 LiDAR elevation data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to refine the elevation /storage relationships used in the modeling analyses. The City's survey also included low entry elevations for structures (including houses and detached garages) adjacent to the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The low entry elevations were used to define the flood improvement target elevations. 2.2 Water Quality Improvement While improving flood risk was the primary focus for Project Areas 1, 3 and 7, improvement options that provide multiple water resource benefits were identified and considered. In addition to quantifying flood improvement benefits, the improvement options were evaluated for volume reduction and pollutant removal using the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minimal Impact Design Standards calculator (November 2012 version). P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports\Projed Areas 1 -3 -7 \STS 406_FinalReport_PAs_1 3_7.docx 3.0. Project Area 1:: North Cornelia Subwatersheds Project Area is generally located near France Avenue, west of Xerxes Avenue and east of Trunk Highway (T.H.) 100, and both north and south of T.H. 62. There are two separate study areas that fall within Project Area 1 =(1) Ashcroft Lane and (2) Barrie Road and York Avenue. Both areas are tributary to the Mn /DOT T.H. 62 drainage system and ultimatelyr discharge. into North,Lake Cornelia. The T.H. 62 infrastructure is currently the controlling factor in the management of storm water from both study areas within Project Area 1. The primary objective of this evaluation was to.identify opportunities within the upstream drainage area(s) to reduce flooding in the identified subwatersheds (NC_26, NC-39, NC_40i- NC_86, NC_88, and NC-97) and provide runoff volume reduction and /or water quality treatment. 3.1 Ashcroft Lane Area (Subwatersheds NC-26 and NC-40) 3.10 Problem. Description A low area exists directly north of North Lake Cornelia; encompassing portions of T.H. 62 and West 641h Street between Ashcroft Lane and St. Johns.Avenue (Subwatersheds NC-26 and NC-40). Flow from the low area is conveyed to North Lake Cornelia (NC-62) through a series of pipes ranging from an 18 -inch to a 21 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), with a 12 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) inlet.in the backyard area north °of West 64th Street, two catch basins on West 64th Street and several inlets along T.H. 62, including an inlet in the grassed "median,of T.H. 62. During large storm events, this area is inundated with stormwater runoff, receiving flows from the subwatersheds directly tributary to the system, as well as flow not captured by the storm'sewer system at the intersection of Ashcroft Lane and West 64th Street and,excess T.H. 62 flows not collected upstream. Because of the topography and the slope of the highway`and adjacent West 64th Street, at this location, runoff from these roadways not collected by the existing storm sewer system will flow overland toward the low area on.T:H. 62 and West 64th Street during:intense rainstorm events. As discussed in more detail in the,CWRMP, the modern standard of practice is usually that storm sewer systems be designed for the "10- year" storm event, which means that there is roughly a 10 percent probability in any year that the system will be overtaxed. Therefore, during large storm events, it is not uncommon for water to be conveyed `along streets and intersection flooding is common, especially in low -lying areas. 3.1.2 Existing Conditions Flood Risk Table 3 -1 summarizes the predicted water surface elevations under existing conditions for the subwatersheds within the Ashcroft Lane study area for the 1 -, 2 -,10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency, 24 7hour duration events. The 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour flood elevation for the T.H. 62 and West 64t' Street area is 868.2. The inundation area corresponding to the 868.2 -flood elevation is shown in Figure 3 =,1. Comparison of the 100 -year flood elevation with adjacent low entry elevations surveyed by the City indicates that three residential dwellings will be impacted by the 100,year, 24- hour'storm event. The surveyed low entry elevations for these three. dwellings (6325 and 6329 Ashcroft Lane, and 6332 St. Johns P: \Mpls�23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 4 Avenue) are 866.1, 865.9, and 868.2, respectively. The two dwellings on Ashcroft Lane (6325 and 6329 Ashcroft Lane) will be impacted by the 10 -year frequency, 24 -hour event. Table 3 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions in Subwatershed NC -40 and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Water Surface Elevation in NC -401 1 -year 864.3(0) 2 -year 865.3(0) 10 -year 866.9(2) 25 -year 867.6(2) 50 -year 867.9(2) 100 -year 868.2(3) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Flood risk analysis maps, often generically referred to as "flood risk maps," were also generated for the Ashcroft Lane area. Figure 3 -2 and Figure 3 -3 show the results of two flood risk maps developed for the Ashcroft Lane area. Figure 3 -2 ( "Annual Flood Risk "), depicts the approximate chance of flooding (as a percentage) for any given year. Figure 3 -3 depicts the approximate chance of flooding (also as a percentage) over the life of a typical 30 -year home mortgage. The purpose of these flood risk maps is to help property owners and the community better understand their potential flood hazard and risk within the inundation areas shown on these maps. These types of flood risk assessments can help guide community mitigation efforts by highlighting areas where risk reduction actions may produce the highest return on investment. 3.1.3 Improvement Options Three flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low area along West 64th Avenue between Ashcroft Lane and St. Johns Avenue, immediately north of T.H. 62. The three options include: Option A: Installation of 42 -inch corrugated polyethylene pipe (CPEP) from NC-40 eastward to connect with the existing storm sewer system between NC-2 and NC-62. Option B: Installation of an additional 36 -inch CPEP beneath T.H. 62 from NC-40 southward to North Lake Cornelia (direction drill pipe beneath T.H. 62) Option C: Installation of a large- capacity culvert beneath T.H. 62 from NC-40 southward to North Lake Cornelia (4 -foot by 12 -foot box culvert) Option A (Figure 3- 4)— proposes the installation of a 42 -inch CPEP from the low area along West 64th Street and the adjacent low backyard area eastward connecting with the existing 42 -inch storm sewer system that conveys water between Garrison Pond (NC_2) and North Lake Cornelia (NC_62). This P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_I_33.docx option would limit construction to City right -of -way and private parcels that are currently at risk of experiencing flooding in a 100 -year event. Option B (Figure 3- 5)— proposes the installation of a 36 -inch CPEP from the low area along West 641h Street and the adjacent low backyard area southward to North Lake Cornelia. The new 36 -inch pipe would be directionally drilled beneath T.H. 62 to avoid closure of the highly - traveled roadway. Option C (Figure 3 -6) —is similar to Option B, but with the installation of a higher- capacity system (4 -foot by 12 -foot box culvert) beneath T.H. 62. Option C is intended to provide a level of protection for the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm event for all dwellings and structures in this area. The system installation would require an open cut installation through T.H. 62, likely to be completed in conjunction with future highway improvements. Flood Benefits Table 3 -2 summarizes the water surface elevations at the low area on West 64th Street resulting from the three improvement options for the 1 -, 2 -, 10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency events. The number of dwellings impacted for each scenario is also included in Table 3-2. Options A and B provide similar benefits, with respect to both the reduction in the maximum water surface elevation and the number of dwellings protected. Implementing either Option A or B would result in the two dwellings on Ashcroft Lane no longer being inundated during the more frequent 10 -year, 24 -hour storm (both dwellings would have at least one -half foot of protection or freeboard). Options A and B reduce the chance of flooding each year, but do not protect the lowest two dwellings on Ashcroft Lane from.larger storm events. Modeling results indicate these structures will still be impacted during .a 25 -year frequency event or greater (or a 4% chance of being inundated in any given year). As shown in Table 3 -2, Option C provides a 100 -year level of protection for all dwellings in this study area. However, an open cut of T.H. 62 will be required. to install the 4 -foot by 12 -foot box culvert, which will require a temporary closure of the highway. None of the three improvement options evaluated have an impact on the 100 -year frequency flood elevation of North Lake Cornelia. P: \Mpls \23 MM27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_i_3_7.docx Table 3 -2 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) at NC -40 under proposed conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions' Option A' (42" pipe to existing storm sewer) Option B' (36" pipe to NC_62) Option C' (4' by 12' box culvert to NC_62) 1 -year 864.3(0) 861.9(0) 861.9(0) 861.8(0) 2-year 865.3(0) 862.4(0) 862.4(0) 862.3(0) 10 -year 866.9(2) 865.5(0) 865.3(0) 863.7(0) 25 -year 867.6(2) 866.4(2) 866.4(2) 864.5(0) 50 -year 867.9(2) 867.0(2) 867.0(2) 865.0(0) 100 -year 868.2(3) 867.7(2) 867.7(2) 865.4(0) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Table 3 -3 summarizes the 100 -year peak discharge rates through the proposed storm sewer pipes for Options A, B, and C. Table 3 -3 100 -year peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Ashcroft lane improvement Options A, B, and C 24 -hour Storm Option A Option C Recurrence (42" pipe to existing storm Option B (4' by 12' box culvert to Interval sewer) (36" pipe to NC_62) NC_62) 100 -year 61 cfs 58 cfs 156 cfs 3.1.4 Engineer's Opinions of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, and C. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 3 -4, are based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix A for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, and C. Many of the flood improvement options identified in this study have high costs. To help evaluate the costs, we have also included an estimated cost for the City to obtain the properties that do not receive a 100 -year level of protection under existing conditions. The buy -out costs summarized in Table 3 -4 are based on the estimated market values of impacted properties as established by the Hennepin County assessor as of January 2, 2012. The City may also wish to consider retrofitting flood -prone residential structures as an alternative option. Retrofitting options and costs vary considerably by individual situation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed retrofitting guidance documents including Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood -Prone Residential Structures (FEMA P -259 /January 2012) and Homeowner's Guide to Retrofitting — Six Ways to Protect Your Home From P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \sTS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx Flooding (FEMA P- 312 /December 2009) that can provide additional reference information as the City considers flood improvement options. Table 3 -4 Estimated costs for Ashcroft Lane (Project Area 1) improvement Options A, B, C and buy -out option Improvement Option Estimated Cost2 Option A: 42" CPEP to existing storm sewer $380,000 Option B: 36" RCP to NC-62 $410,000 Option C. 4' by 12' box culvert to NC-62 $710,000 Buy -out Option' $770,000 1 Buy -out costs based on combined estimated market value for three impacted dwellings under existing conditions for the 100 -year frequency event, as reported on Hennepin County property information search website. 2 Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. 3.2 Barrie Road and York Avenue Area (Subwatersheds NC-86, NC-88., NC-97, NC-99) 3.2.1 Problem Description Figure 3 -7 shows the Project Area 1 study area within the Barrie Road and York Avenue areas. These areas are described in further detail below. Discharge from both of these study areas currently is conveyed to Lake Cornelia. Lake Cornelia is listed on the MPCA impaired waters list for excess nutrients (phosphorus). A Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) was conducted by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) in 2009 -2010 to evaluate the problem of excess phosphorus in Lake Cornelia and identify sources. Stormwater runoff was determined to be the primary source of phosphorus to the lake, and opportunities to reduce phosphorus contributions to the lake should be considered as redevelopment and infrastructure improvements occur within the Lake Cornelia watershed. Barrie Road (Subwatersheds NC 86, NC-97 and NC-99) A depression area exists at the intersection of Barrie Road and Heritage Drive and extends south of the intersection along Barrie Road to West 65th Street. Stormwater from Subwatersheds NC_86 and NC_97 is collected by storm sewer that flows northward, connecting with the T.H. 62 system near the intersection of Heritage Drive and Barrie Road. Stormwater runoff from Subwatershed NC-99 is conveyed eastward to the pond at West 64th Street and York Avenue; however, surface flow -by (runoff not captured by the storm sewer system) from NC-99 flows northward along Barrie Road to the low area. During large storm events, this large depression area is inundated, causing street and parking lot flooding. The subwatershed divides shown on Figure 3 -7 were previously delineated using the City's 2 -foot topography data from 2001. However, newer and more accurate topographic data (MNDNR 2011 LiDAR elevation data) were used for modeling storage and delineating inundation areas for this project; therefore, the inundation P.\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\ST5 _406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 8 areas shown in Figure 3 -7 that appear to overflow from one subwatershed to the next are not actually surface overflows, but rather represent areas where slight changes to subwatershed divides (such that the inundation area along Barrie Road remains within Subwatersheds NC-86 and NC-97) may be warranted in the future. Pond at West 64th Street & York Avenue (Subwatershed NC 88) A stormwater detention basin (York Pond) is located just south of West 6411 Street between York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. The York Pond, which receives direct runoff from Subwatershed NC-88 and runoff from Subwatershed NC_99 via storm sewer, is land- locked. In the past, two separate pumped outlets have controlled water levels in the pond. The first outlet has two pumps, each with an approximate pumping rate of 500 gpm (1.1 cfs), that discharges west through a forcemain connecting to the gravity system along Barrie Road. The second outlet to the east is also controlled by two 500 gpm pumps, discharging south along Xerxes Avenue, eventually connecting into the West 661h Street system. The XP -SWMM modeling completed for the CWRMP assumed that the first pumps on each system turned on when the water elevation reaches 863, with the second pumps turning on at elevation 864. All pumps turned off when the water level recedes to 862. At the time of this study, City staff indicated that the pumping system to the west is not currently operational. 3.2.2 Model Updates The XP -SWMM model for the Barrie Road and York Avenue study area was updated to reflect new rainfall depths as defined by Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, several additional surface overflows were added to the model in the areas of interest to accommodate the additional flows. The original XP -SWMM model for the Barrie Road and York Avenue area included two pumps at the York Pond. Because the west pumping system is not currently operational, the model was revised to reflect the reduced pumping capacity. The stage- storage relationship of the subwatersheds within the Barrie Road and West 64th and York Avenue study areas were updated based on the 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset from the MDNR. 3.2.3 Existing Conditions Flood Risk Table 3 -5 summarizes the predicted water surface elevations under existing conditions for the subwatersheds within the Barrie Road and York Avenue study area for the 1 -, 2 -,10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency events. The inundation areas corresponding to the 100 -year, 24 -hour flood elevations along Barrie Road and in the York Avenue Pond area (NC_88) are shown in Figure 3 -7. P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7 \STS 406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx Table 3 -5 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions at Barrie Road (NC-86) and York Pond (NC_88) and the impact to structures at that corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Water Surface Elevation' at Barrie Road (NC_86)2 Water Surface Elevations at York Pond (NC_88)' 1 -year 874.3(0/0) 866.2(0) 2 -year 876.7(0/0) 867.4(0) 10 -year 879.3(0/0) 870.5(l) 25 year 879.7(0/0) 871.9(5) 50 -year 880.0(0/0) 872.8(6) 100 -year 880.4 (0/11) 873.6(8) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths 2 Number of impacted dwelling /garage structures shown in parentheses (garages may be multi - stall) 3 Number of parcels where any structure (dwelling and /or garage) is impacted shown in parentheses (dwellings may be multi -unit and garages may be multi- stall) Barrie Road Along Barrie Road, there are eleven garage structures that will be potentially impacted by the 100 -year 24 -hour storm event. These garage structures are along the entire stretch of the east side of Barrie Road (Figure 3 -7). The flood elevation for the 100 -year, 24 -storm is approximately the same as the low entry elevation of three of the garage structures and slightly above the low entry elevation of the remaining eight garage structures; therefore, where inundation occurs, the flooding depth is minimal (about 0.1 -0.2 feet). York Avenue Pond The 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour flood elevation for the York Pond is 873.6, which is higher than the 100 -year flood elevation identified in the CWRMP (870.9). The increase in flood level is a result of the increased precipitation depth and runoff volume based on Atlas 14, as well as the reduced pumping capacity. The inundation area corresponding to the 873.6 flood elevation is shown in Figure 3 -7. Comparison of the flood elevations for York Pond (NC_88) with adjacent low entry elevations surveyed by the City indicates that eight parcels will have impacted structures from the 100 -year flood elevation. This includes multi -unit buildings at 6415 York Avenue and 6455 York Avenue, and 2 -unit buildings (side -by- side homes) at 6338, 6344, 6400, 6408, 6416, and 6420 Xerxes Avenue. The lowest structure, adjacent to York Pond (6415 York Avenue in NC_88), has a low entry elevation of 869.1. The next two lowest structures (both located at 6455 York Avenue) have low entry elevations of 871.1 feet and 871.2 feet. As shown in Table 3 -5, the parcel with the lowest structure will be potentially impacted by the 10 -year 24 -hour storm event. The parcel with the next lowest two structures is potentially impacted by a 25 -year 24 -hour storm event. P: \Mpls \23 MM27 \2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS 406\Final ReportsWroject Areas 1- 3- 7 \STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1 3 7.docx 10 Flood risk analysis maps, often generically referred to as "flood risk maps" were also generated for the Barrie Road and York Pond area. Figure 3 -8 ( "Annual Flood Risk "), depicts the approximate chance of flooding (as a percentage) for any given year. Figure 3 -9 depicts the approximate chance of flooding (also as a percentage) over the life of a typical 30 -year home mortgage. The purpose of these flood risk maps is to help property owners and the community better understand their potential flood hazard and risk in the inundation areas shown on these maps. These types of flood risk assessments can help guide community mitigation efforts by highlighting areas where risk reduction actions may produce the highest return on investment. 3.2.4 Improvement Options Several flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low area along Barrie Road and the York Pond area. The following three options were effective in reducing flood risks in this study area and were therefore more closely evaluated (including preparation of a cost estimate): Option A: Installation of a 36 -inch CPEP from the Barrie Road low point westward to the Swimming Pool Pond (NC_3) Option B: Installation of a 48 -inch CPEP from the Barrie Road low point westward to the Swimming Pool Pond (NC_3) and increase pump capacity Option C: Installation of a 36 -inch CPEP from the Barrie Road low point westward to the Swimming Pool Pond (NC_3) and install underground storage in NC-88 subwatershed Option A (Figure 3- 10)— proposes the installation of a new 36 -inch pipe CPEP that runs south along Barrie Road, then westerly along West 65"' Street, discharging into the Swimming Pool Pond (NC_3). This option includes the removal of the existing storm sewer that conveys runoff from Subwatershed NC-99 to York Pond. Option A reduces the flood risk on Barrie Road and significantly reduces the volume of water contributing to flooding in the York Avenue Pond (NC-88). Option B (Figure 3- 11) —is similar to Option A, but includes the installation of a larger (48 -inch) CPEP to the west and increased pumping capacity from the York Pond (NC-88). The current non - operational 1000 gpm pump system to the west would be replaced with a 3500 gpm pump system, with the flow directed westward through a forcemain to the new proposed 48 -inch Barrie Road pipe system. Option C (Figure 3- 12)— includes Option A (installation of the 36 -inch CPEP from Barrie Road to Swimming Pool Pond) and installation of underground storage /infiltration chambers within the NC-88 subwatershed to reduce the volume of runoff reaching the York Pond. The Hennepin County Soil Survey indicates that soils in this area are Hydrologic Soil Group "A" indicating that the soils are well drained having high infiltration potential. This option is intended to provide a 100 -year level of protection for all parcels in this area, with exception of the parcel nearest to the York Pond (building with 14 condominiums at 6415 York Avenue) with a low entry elevation of 869.1. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS- 406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 11 Option C assumes installation of approximately 2 acre -feet of storage volume in the underground infiltration chambers. Due to the topography within Subwatershed NC-88 and existing utility locations, available space for the installation of an underground system is limited. However, it appears feasible if multiple chambers are installed in the portion of the right -of -way throughout the NC-88 subwatershed not conflicting with sanitary sewer and water main and beneath the access road and parking lot of 6455 York Avenue. Based on the assumptions that water in the underground storage system infiltrates at a rate of 0.8 inches per hour (Minnesota Stormwater Manual) and the chamber /rock storage system has a volume depth of 5 feet, an infiltration footprint of approximately 0.7 acres would be required to achieve the 2 acre -feet of desired storage volume. Several other improvement options were evaluated using the XP -SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model, but were not effective in reducing flood risk in the Barrie Road and York Pond areas. The improvement options that were evaluated included re- grading of Strachauer Park north of T.H. 62 to provide flood storage'and detention, and significantly upsizing the T.H. 62 storm sewer system and pipes that connect the T.H. 62 system to Barrie Road. Flood Benefits Table 3 -6 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations along Barrie Road for Options A, B, and C. The additional outflow capacity provided in Option A is sufficient to lower the 100 -year maximum water surface elevation along Barrie Road below the low entries of the lowest lying garage structures (the predicted water surface elevation is 0.2 feet lower than the lowest entry elevation). However, the road would still be inundated (approximately 2 feet of flood depth at the lowest point) during a 100 -year, 24 -hour storm event. Table 3 -6 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions at Barrie Road and the number of garage structures (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions' Option A' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 36" pipe) Option B' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 48" pipe and pump pond) Option C' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 36" pipe and use underground storage) 1 -year 874.3(0) 874.3(0) 874.4(0) 874.3(0) 2 -year 876.7(0) 874.7(0) 874.9(0) 874.7(0) 10 -year 879.3(0) 878.6(0) 876.7(0) 878.6(0) 25 year 879.7(0) 879.3(0) 878.6(0) 879.3(0) 50 -year 880.0(0) 879.7(0) 879.1(0) 879.7(0) 100 -year 880.4 (11) 880.0(0) 879.5(0) 880.0(0) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7 \STS -406 FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 12 Table 3 -7 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations in NC_88 (York Pond) as a result of Options A, B, and C. In addition to reducing the flood risk along Barrie Road, Option A reduces the number of parcels with impacted structures adjacent to York Pond from eight to five for the 100 -year event, 24 -hour event. The additional Barrie Road capacity and the diversion of runoff from Subwatershed NC-99 results in a significant reduction in runoff volume to York Pond, reducing the flood elevations in the NC-88 area for all storm events (Table 3 -7). However, two parcels are still provided less than a 50 -year level of protection under Option A. Option B, along with the proposed 48 -inch CPEP system between Barrie Road and Swimming Pool Pond, provides a 100 -year level of protection to all parcels, with exception of 6415 York Avenue, the lowest -lying dwelling. Similarly, Option C, which includes underground storage and the proposed 36 -inch CPEP system between Barrie Road and Swimming Pool Pond, provides a 100 -year level of protection to all parcels, with exception of 6415 York Avenue, the lowest lying dwelling. Table 3 -7 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in York Pond (NC-88) and the number of parcels (shown in parentheses) with impacted structures at that corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions' Option A' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 36" pipe) Option B' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 48" pipe and pump pond) Option C' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 36" pipe and use underground storage) 1 -year 866.2(0) 864.4(0) 863.1(0) 862.0(0) 2 -year 867.4(0) 865.2(0) 863.7(0) 862.0(0) 10 -year 870.5(l) 868.6(0) 866.5(0) 864.7(0) 25 -year 871.9(5) 870.3(l) 868.7(0) 867.7(0) 50 -year 872.8(6) 871.3 (2) 870.0(1) 869.6(l) 100 -year 873.6(8) 872.1(5) 871.1(1) 871.0(1) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths While the goal of Options A, B, and C is to provide additional flow capacity to reduce flooding in the Barrie Road and York Avenue areas, it is also important to ensure that the downstream storage areas receiving the additional water are not impacted such that they cause new flooding concerns. Table 3 -8 summarizes the maximum water surface elevations for the 100 -year 24 -hour storm event in the storage areas directly downstream of the proposed improvements as a result of Options A, B, and C. Options A, B, and C all result in approximately 0.1 foot increase to the flood elevation of North Lake Cornelia. Option B results in approximately 0.1 foot increase to the flood elevation in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond, while Options A and C cause no increases to Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS _406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 13 Table 3 -8 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions for the 100 -year 24 -hour storm event in North Cornelia, Swim Pool Pond, and Point of France Pond Water Quality Benerits Although flood risk reduction is the primary objective of this analysis, water quality benefits of the identified Options A, B, and C should also be considered, especially considering that downstream Lake Cornelia is on the MPCA impaired waters list for excess nutrients (phosphorus). All of the identified options include rerouting Subwatershed NC _99 to the Swimming Pool Pond, instead of conveying runoff from this Subwatershed to the York Pond. While this system modification will result in more runoff being discharged to Lake Cornelia on an average annual basis, the stormwater will receive treatment as it flows through the Swimming Pool Pond to Lake Cornelia. The CWRMP indicates that the Swimming Pool Pond (NC_3) achieves 25 -40% annual total phosphorus removal under existing drainage and land use conditions. If the proposed Barrie Road storm sewer is installed, additional opportunities for pretreatment or infiltration prior to discharge to NC-3 should be considered. Option C, rerouting the Barrie Road system and installing an underground storage and infiltration system, has the greatest water quality benefit of all options considered. Currently, runoff that reaches York Pond either infiltrates, evaporates, or is pumped downstream to Lake Cornelia. Without detailed pumping records, it is difficult to determine the annual runoff volume that is lost through infiltration or evaporation versus pumped downstream. However, with installation of the proposed underground storage system, essentially all of the annual runoff would be captured in the underground storage system or pond and infiltrated. 3.2.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, and C. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 3 -9, are based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix B for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, and C. Many of the flood improvement options identified in this study have high costs. To help evaluate the costs, we have also included an estimated cost for the City to obtain the properties that do not receive a P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.doa 14 Option C' (Reroute Option B' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 36" Option A' (Reroute Barrie Rd. with 48" pipe and use Barrie Rd. with 36" pipe and pump underground Water Body Existing Conditions' pipe) pond) storage) North Lake Cornelia 865.0 865.1 1 865.1 865.1 Swimming Pool Pond 865.7 865.7 865.8 865.7 Point of France Pond 866.6 866.6 866.7 866.6 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Water Quality Benerits Although flood risk reduction is the primary objective of this analysis, water quality benefits of the identified Options A, B, and C should also be considered, especially considering that downstream Lake Cornelia is on the MPCA impaired waters list for excess nutrients (phosphorus). All of the identified options include rerouting Subwatershed NC _99 to the Swimming Pool Pond, instead of conveying runoff from this Subwatershed to the York Pond. While this system modification will result in more runoff being discharged to Lake Cornelia on an average annual basis, the stormwater will receive treatment as it flows through the Swimming Pool Pond to Lake Cornelia. The CWRMP indicates that the Swimming Pool Pond (NC_3) achieves 25 -40% annual total phosphorus removal under existing drainage and land use conditions. If the proposed Barrie Road storm sewer is installed, additional opportunities for pretreatment or infiltration prior to discharge to NC-3 should be considered. Option C, rerouting the Barrie Road system and installing an underground storage and infiltration system, has the greatest water quality benefit of all options considered. Currently, runoff that reaches York Pond either infiltrates, evaporates, or is pumped downstream to Lake Cornelia. Without detailed pumping records, it is difficult to determine the annual runoff volume that is lost through infiltration or evaporation versus pumped downstream. However, with installation of the proposed underground storage system, essentially all of the annual runoff would be captured in the underground storage system or pond and infiltrated. 3.2.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, and C. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 3 -9, are based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix B for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, and C. Many of the flood improvement options identified in this study have high costs. To help evaluate the costs, we have also included an estimated cost for the City to obtain the properties that do not receive a P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.doa 14 100 -year level of protection under existing conditions. The costs to obtain the properties are summarized in Table 3 -9 and are based on the estimated market values of parcels with impacted structures as established by the Hennepin County assessor as of January 2, 2012. The City may also wish to consider retrofitting flood -prone residential structures as an alternative option. Retrofitting options and costs vary considerably by individual situation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed retrofitting guidance documents including Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood -Prone Residential Structures (FEMA P -259 /January 2012) and Homeowner's Guide to Retrofitting — Six Ways to Protect Your Home From Flooding (FEMA P- 312 /December 2009) that can provide additional reference information as the City considers flood improvement options. Table 3 -9 Estimated costs for Barrie Road and York Avenue (Project Area 1) improvement Options A, B, C and buy -out option Improvement Option Estimated Cost2 Option A: 36" CPEP from Barrie Road to Swimming Pool Pond $1,820,000 Option B. 48" CPEP from Barrie Road to Swimming Pool Pond and $2,590,000 increased pump capacity Option C. 36" CPEP from Barrie Road to Swimming Pool Pond and $3,770,000 underground storage /infiltration Buy -out Option' $5,350,000 1 Buy -out costs based on combined estimated market value for impacted dwellings (multi -unit buildings) under existing conditions for the 100 year frequency event, as reported on Hennepin County property information search website. This cost assumes buy -outs of all units in the multi -unit buildings; purchase of only select impacted units may be an option, but would require additional survey and review of the layout of the multi -unit buildings. 2 Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \workFlles\2013 \STS_406\Final Reports\ProjectAreas 1- 3- 7 \STS_406_FinalRepor PAs_1_3_7.docx 15 4.0 Project. Area 3: Lake Pamela SubWatersheds LP 24 and LP 27 4.1 Problem Description Figure 4 -1 shows the Project Area 3 study area. Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of this area indicates that a flooding problem occurs at the West 60th. Street and Chowen Avenue intersection, as well as in the backyard areas on, the east side of the 5800 block of Chowen Avenue. The backyard depression area (Subwatershed LP-24) currently is not connected to the City storm sewer system and becomes inundated during large rainfall events, potentially impacting several adjacent structures. Stormwater from the backyard area will flow to Chowen Avenue via surface overflow at an elevation of 883.3 feet based on the City's topographic survey. During the City's field survey, several drain inlets were observed in the backyard area. Further investigation by City staff indicated that these drains were not connected to the City's storm sewer or sanitary sewer systems, and appear to be French drain -type system(s). For purposes of this modeling analysis, it was assumed that these drains are not functional. Project Area lis drained by a storm sewer system that.discharges into Lake Pamela (LP-26). The system was originally designed and constructed in the mid -'1950s and thus was not sized in a manner consistent with the City's current design criteria. The lack of sufficient capacity in the existing system results in flows backing up and pooling in the low area at the intersection of West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue during large storm events, potentially impacting several adjacent structures: The Project Area 3 neighborhood is one of the residential areas within, Ediha where significant residential redevelopment is anticipated. As houses are remodeled or torn down and rebuilt, the impervious footprint tends to increase from original construction conditions. This increa se. in impervious surface and /or directly- connected impervious surface can result in increased stormwater runoff rate and volume. The streets within the portion of the Project Area 3 study area east of France Avenue will be reconstructed in upcoming years (2014 - 2018). The upcoming street reconstruction may present unique opportunities for stormwater infrastructure improvements to reduce flood risk within "Project Area 3 and improve the water quality being discharged to downstream Lake Pamela and Minnehaha Creek. 4.2 Model Updates The XP -SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model for Project Area'3 was updated to reflect new rainfall depths as defined`by NOAA Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, several additional overflows were added to.the model within the Project Area 3 study area. The City provided topographic survey of the backyard depression area and low area along Chowen Avenue.. This information was used in conjunction with the MNDNR's 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset to update the stage- storage relationships in the model for subwatersheds within the Project Area 3 study -area. The storm sewer information.in the model was also updated based on a survey conducted by the City. y MN\27 \2327354 \WorkFiles\ 2013\ STS _406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 16 4.3 Existing Conditions Flood Risk Table 4 -1 summarizes the predicted water surface elevations under existing conditions for the subwatersheds within Project Area 3 for the 1 -, 2 -,10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour duration events. The 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour flood elevation for Project Area 3 (LP-24 and LP 27) is 883.9. The inundation area corresponding to the 883.9 flood elevation is shown in Figure 4 -1. Flood frequency data is often also described in terms of a percentage of risk. For example, the 100 -year frequency flood inundation area represents an area that bias a 1% chance of flooding (1- percent - annual chance flood) for any given year. Structures located within the 1- percent - annual chance flood inundation area have a 26 percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30 -year mortgage. The City provided survey of the low entry elevations for properties adjacent to the LP-24 and LP-27 low areas. Comparison of these elevations with the 100 -year flood elevation indicates that seven dwellings will be impacted by the 100 -year flood elevation in the backyard depression area (LP-24) and sixteen dwellings will be impacted at West 60th and Chowen Avenue (LP-27). As shown in Table 4 -1, six dwellings in the backyard depression area and seven structures along Chowen Avenue will be impacted by the 10 -year frequency event. Modeling results indicate that three dwellings within Subwatershed LP 24 and one dwelling within Subwatershed LP-27 (5932 Chowen Avenue) are impacted as often as the 1 -year frequency event (in other words, a 100 - percent - annual chance). Although modeling results indicate potential impacts in the LP-24 subwatershed as often as the 1 -year event, the French drain -type system(s) in place may be functioning sufficiently to reduce the frequency of flooding. Table 4 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions at the Chowen Avenue backyard depression area (LP-24) and West 60th street and Chowen Avenue intersection (LP-27) and the number of dwellings/ garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Water Surface Elevation at Chowen Ave LP 24 Water Surface Elevation at LP 27 1 -year 882.7(3/2) 880.8(1/0) 2-year 882.9(3/2) 881.4(2/1) 10 -year 883.3(6/2) 882.7(7/2) 25 -year 883.5(6/2) 883.3(9/2) 50 -year 883.6(7/2) 883.6 (12/3) 100 -year 883.9(7/2) 883.9 (16/3) Flood risk analysis maps, often generically referred to as "flood risk maps," were also generated for the Project Area 3 study area. Figure 4 -2 ("Annual Flood Risk "), depicts the approximate chance of flooding (as a percentage) for any given year. Figure 4 -3 depicts the approximate chance of flooding (also as a P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 17 percentage) over the life of a typical 30 -year home mortgage. The purpose of these flood risk maps is to help property owners and the community better understand their potential flood hazard and risk in the inundation areas shown on these maps. These types of flood risk assessments can help guide community mitigation efforts by highlighting areas where risk reduction actions may produce the highest return on investment. 4.3.1 Residential Redevelopment Residential redevelopment within Project Area 3 is resulting in properties with an increased percentage of impervious area or directly- connected impervious area, which can increase the stormwater runoff rate and volume. A review of recent residential directly- connected imperviousness increases was conducted using GIS to approximate a "typical" impervious percentage for redeveloped residential properties. A modeling analysis was then conducted for this project area to help identify the potential impacts from the increased imperviousness in this and other Edina neighborhoods. The impervious areas of several recent residential redevelopment lots throughout Edina were delineated using GIS. The approximated directly- connected imperviousness (DCI) of these lots ranged from 30% to 45 %. For the modeling analysis, a directly- connected imperviousness of 40% was used for low- density residential areas, which is a significant increase from the 20% directly- connected imperviousness assumption used in the original XP -SWMM models developed for the City. Three redevelopment "scenarios" were modeled for Project Area 3: (1) 1/3 of residential properties redeveloped, (2) 2/3 of residential properties redeveloped, and (3) all residential properties redeveloped. The modeling results, summarized in Table 4 -2, indicate that the increase in imperviousness has minimal impact on flood volume in subwatershed LP_27 for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event. The corresponding increase in peak flood elevation is also minimal (approximately 0.1 feet under the 100% redevelopment scenario). Table 4 -2 Comparison of flood volumes in Subwatershed LP-27 for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event under varying residential redevelopment scenarios P: \Mpls \23 MM27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports\Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 18 Subwatershed LP-27 Total Flood Volume' % Increase in Total Scenario (acre -feet) Flood Volume' No Redevelopment 8.50 - Scenario 1: 1/3 redevelopment2 8.68 2% Scenario 2: 2/3 redevelopment2 8.85 4% Scenario 3: all lots reclevelopec12 9.02 6% 1 Total flood volume represents the volume of runoff stored in Subwatershed LP 27 at the time corresponding with the peak water surface elevation. 2 Increases in flood depth range from 0.03 to 0.1 feet for the 113 redevelopment to the 100% redevelopment scenarios. P: \Mpls \23 MM27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports\Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 18 Upon review of the modeling results for the redevelopment scenarios, the following question may arise "Why does the increased imperviousness not have a greater impact on 100 -year flood elevations in the LP-27 subwatershed ?" The answer is that the existing storm sewer system has insufficient capacity to drain the LP-27 and adjacent subwatersheds, resulting in significant ponding at West 60t' Street and Chowen Avenue. A moderate increase in runoff volume is therefore distributed over a large area. The intensity of the 100 -year event is another reason that the impacts of increased imperviousness are not greater. During the peak intensity of large storm events, the rainfall intensity (inches /hour) often greatly exceeds the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils. During these times, the amount of rainfall infiltrated in a given time period can be small compared to the amount of runoff generated. Table 4 -3 summarizes the impacts of increased imperviousness on runoff depths generated from rainfall events ranging from 1 -year to 100 -year frequencies. The runoff depths are from a representative residential subwatershed within Project Area 3 (LP_20), comprised entirely of B soils (predominant soil type in Edina). As shown in Table 4 -3, the percent increase in runoff resulting from increased imperviousness is greater for-more frequent, less intense rainfall events. The increase in runoff depth decreases as the rainfall event becomes more intense. Table 4 -3 Comparison of runoff depths from a residential Subwatershed (LP-20) with B soils under varying directly- connected imperviousness (DCI) scenarios and precipitation frequencies Recurrence Interval 24 -hour Rainfall Depth (inches) Subwatershed LP-20 Runoff Depth' with 20% DCI (inches /acre) Existing Conditions Runoff Depth' with 27% DCI (inches /acre) 113 Redeveloped Runoff Depth' with 33% DCI (inches /acre) 213 Redeveloped Runoff Depth' with 40% DCI (inches /acre) 100% Redeveloped Increase in Runoff Depth between Existing Conditions and 100% Redeveloped ( %) 1 -year 2.5 0.84 0.96 1.09 1.22 46% 2-year 2.9 1.13 1.26 1.40 1.53 36% 10 -year 4.3 2.30 2.46' 2.61 2.76 20% 25 year 5.4 3.28 3.45 3.61 3.78 15% 50 -year 6.4 4.17 4.35 4.52 4.69 13% 100 -year •7.5 5.17 5.36 5.54 5.72 11% 1 Runoff depths reflect site runoff only fie., subwatershed runoff that has not been conveyed downstream). P. \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1 3_7.doa 19 4.4 Improvement Options The following flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low areas within Project Area 3: Option A: Infiltration Swales Incorporate stormwater infiltration swales within City right -of -way. Install a new pipe to drain LP-24 backyard depression area. Option B: Infiltration Swales with Storage Pipes Incorporate stormwater infiltration swales and 36 -inch perforated underground storage /infiltration pipes (CPEP) within City right -of -way. Install a new pipe to drain LP-24 backyard depression area. Option C: New Pipe on West 60th Street Install a new pipe to drain LP_24 backyard depression area; install a new pipe to drain LP-27 low area, connecting to the existing system near the intersection of France Avenue and Halifax; upsize the existing storm sewer from France Avenue and Halifax to Pamela Park stormwater pond (LP_26) Option D: Upsize Existing Storm Sewer Install new pipe to drain LP-24 backyard depression area; Upsize the existing storm sewer from West 601h Street and Chowen Avenue to Lake Pamela (LP-26) Options A and B: Right -of -Way Stormwater Storage /Infiltration The lack of sufficient capacity in the existing system results in flows "backing up" and pooling in the low area at the intersection of West 601h Street and Chowen Avenue during large storm events. One method to reduce the runoff that reaches this intersection is to provide additional flood storage and infiltration throughout the drainage area. Options A and B reflect two Living Streets stormwater storage and infiltration concepts that were developed for Project Area 3. Option A includes infiltration swales installed within the City right -of -way. The shallow (6- to 1- inches deep) swales or depressed gardens, shown conceptually in Figure 4 -4 as turfed swales, would collect and infiltrate runoff from the roadway and adjacent driveways. For modeling and cost estimating purposes, it was assumed that infiltration swales would be installed in approximately 70% of the parcels within the street reconstruction area (see Figure 4 -5). A collector pipe would also be installed between the infiltration swales and street to convey overflows and draintile flows, where appropriate, to the existing storm sewer system. Option B includes the right -of -way infiltration swales of Option A, in addition to installation of 36 -inch perforated pipes (CPEP) between the infiltration swales and street to provide additional flood storage and infiltration. Both Options A and B include installation of a new 24 -inch CPEP from the LP-24 backyard depression to the existing system at the West 601h Street and Chowen Avenue intersection. PAMpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS - 406 \Final Reports\Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS - 406- FinalReport_PAs- 1_3- 7.docx 20 f- Figure 4-4 Conceptual drawing of Option A, right -of -way infiltration swales for Project Area 3 street reconstruction areas Options C and D: Additional Storm Sewer Capacity Improvement Options C and D both provide additional storm sewer capacity to reduce the flood risk in Subwatersheds LP-27 and LP-24, but differ in the proposed storm sewer configuration. Option C (Figure 4 -6) includes installation of a new 48 -inch pipe westward along West 60th Street from the existing system at West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue intersection (Subwatershed LP-27) to France Avenue, then southward to the existing system near the intersection of France Avenue and Halifax Avenue. Option C also includes upgrading the existing storm sewer pipes to 60 -inch CPEP (or equivalent capacity) from France and Halifax to Lake Pamela (Subwatershed LP-26). One advantage of this storm sewer configuration is that it does not require replacement of pipes between properties on France Avenue and Ewing Avenue. However, review of elevation data indicates that a deep cut would be necessary for installation along West 60th Street and France Avenue. Option D (Figure 4 -7) includes upsizing of the existing storm sewer system from West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue to Lake Pamela (Subwatershed LP-26). Table 4 -4 describes the proposed pipe size increases. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \workFiles \2013 \STS 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 21 Table 4 -4 Proposed pipe. size increases for Option D in Project Area 3 (West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue) Existing,Size Proposed Size. Pipe Segment (Diameter)), (Diameter) Pipe on Chowen Avenue from West 601h to West 611t Street 24 -inch 54 -inch 4.4.1 'Flood Benefits Table 4 -5 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations in the LP-24 backyard depression area for .Options A, B, C, and'D for the 1 -, 2 -,10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100-year frequency, 24 -hour rainfall events. Note that all options shown in Table 4 -5 include installation of a new pipe to drain the backyard area. Modeling results indicate that connection of the backyard depression area without increasing the downstream pipe capacity will not provide 100 -year level of protection to the adjacent properties. Table 4 -5 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed'conditions in LP-24 and the.number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 22 Option Bt: 24 -hour Storm Option At:. Infiltration Option C?:. New Option'DI: Recurrence Existing Infiltration Swales with Pipe on West 60th Upsize Existing Interval Conditions' Swales Storage. Pipes Street Storm Sewer 1 year 882.7(3/2) 881.3(0/0) 877.3 (0/0) 877.3(0/0) 877.3(0/0) 2 year ;, 882 9 (3/2) 8812t(0/0) `s 877 5 (0 /0) 877.5 10 -year 883.3(6/2) 882.7(3/2) 882.4(3/2) 878.1(0/0) 878.1(0/0) 883.'3 (6/2) 883 1(5/2) 878 7 (0 /0) 878.7 , _ .., 50 year 883.6(7/2) 88315(7/2) 883.4(6/2) 881.1(0/0) 881.5(0/0) 100 year,, 883.9 (7/2) 9 (7/2) 883'8 (7/2) :' 18 88'(0/0) c 8 82.0 `Y \+ `883 i Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 22 Table 4 -6 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations in the low area at West 6011 Street and Chowen Avenue (LP _27) for Options A, B, C, and D for the 1 -, 2 -, 10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour rainfall events. Options A and B offer some flood risk reduction in the more frequent storms (1 -year and 2 -year events), but do not result in significant improvements in the less frequency storms. Options C and. D provide a 50 -year level of protection'for all adjacent structures and a 100 -year level protection for all structures with exception of one dwelling at 5932 Chowen Avenue. Table 4 -6 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP-27 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are Inundated at that corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions' Option A': Infiltration Swales Option B': Infiltration Swales with Storage Pipes Option Cl: New Pipe on West 60th Street Option D': Upsize Existing Storm Sewer 1 -year 880.8(1/0) 880.3(1/0) 877.1(0/0) 873.6(0/0) 871.0(0/0) 2 -year 881.4(2/1) 881.3(2/1) 879.5(0/0) 874.0(0/0) 871.3(0/0) 10 year 882.7(7/2) 882.7(7/2) 882.4(5/2) 875.0(0/0) 872.8(0/0) 25 year 883.3(9/2) 883.2(9/2) 883.1(9/2) 876.4(0/0) 876.1(0/0) 50 year 883.6 (12/3) 883.5 (12/2) 883.4 (11/2) 879.4(0/0) 880.0(0/0) 100 -year 883.9 (16/3) 883.9 (13/3) 883.8 (13/3) 880.7(1/0) 880.9(1/0) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Table 4 -7 summarizes the 100 -year peak discharge rates through the proposed storm sewer pipes for Options A, B, C, and D. The storm sewer manhole located on France Avenue approximately 120 feet south of Halifax Avenue, where flows from the France Avenue system are conveyed westward to Lake Pamela, surcharges under existing and proposed conditions. Based on the topographic information, the surcharged runoff pools on France Avenue and then flows overland to Lake Pamela between 6117 Halifax Avenue and 6108 France Avenue. Options C and D result in increased overland flows between France Avenue and Lake Pamela for the 10 -year rainfall event and greater. The City should consider surveying the overland flow conveyance channel between these two properties to verify flow capacity, assess potential impacts to the dwellings, and determine if any grading modifications should be considered to reduce flood risk. P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS_406 FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.doa 23 Table 4 -7 100 -year peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Project Area 3 improvement Options A, B, C, and D 4.4.2 Water Quality Benefits Although flood risk reduction is the primary objective of this analysis, water quality benefits of the identified Options A, B, C, and D should also be considered. Currently, runoff from Project Area 3 is discharged downstream to Lake Pamela without any water quality treatment or pretreatment. While incorporating living streets concepts into the upcoming street reconstruction project (Options A and B) has less impactful flood risk reduction benefits than providing additional storm sewer capacity (Options C and D), the water quality benefits of Options A and B are substantially greater. With implementation of Option A (infiltration swales in the right -of -way), the average annual runoff volume, total phosphorus, and total suspended solids generated from the portion of the study area tributary to the infiltrations swales will be reduced by approximately 70 %. This equates to an approximate 30% reduction in total phosphorus and total suspended solids from the entire Project Area 3 drainage area tributary to Lake Pamela. With Option B, the average annual reduction in total phosphorus and total suspended solids loading from Project Area 3 to Lake Pamela is reduced by 40 %, based on the MPCA MIDS calculator. Options A or B would also help mitigate water quality impacts to downstream Lake Pamela and Minnehaha Creek from impervious increases resulting from residential redevelopment. For Options C and D, installation of underground treatment structures within the tributary drainage area would be recommended as part of pipe upgrades, to provide pretreatment of the water prior to discharge to Lake Pamela. The opinions of probable cost for Options C and D include installation of a 96 -inch diameter sump manhole with a SAFL baffle. 4.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, C, and D. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 4 -8, are based on our experience with similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix C for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, C, and D. P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406- FinalReport- PAs- 1- 3 -7.doa 24 Option B': 24 -hour Storm Option A': Infiltration Option C2: New Option D': Recurrence Existing Infiltration Swales with Pipe on West Upsize Existing Interval Conditions' Swales Storage Pipes 60th Street Storm Sewer 100 -year 27 11 27 27 120 158 1 Flow rates reflect flow through pipe on Chowen Avenue between West 60' Street and West 615' Street 2 Flow rates reflect flow through proposed pipe on West 60' Street between France Avenue and Chowen Avenue and do not include flow to the existing pipe on Chowen Avenue between West 60'x' and 61s' Streets. 4.4.2 Water Quality Benefits Although flood risk reduction is the primary objective of this analysis, water quality benefits of the identified Options A, B, C, and D should also be considered. Currently, runoff from Project Area 3 is discharged downstream to Lake Pamela without any water quality treatment or pretreatment. While incorporating living streets concepts into the upcoming street reconstruction project (Options A and B) has less impactful flood risk reduction benefits than providing additional storm sewer capacity (Options C and D), the water quality benefits of Options A and B are substantially greater. With implementation of Option A (infiltration swales in the right -of -way), the average annual runoff volume, total phosphorus, and total suspended solids generated from the portion of the study area tributary to the infiltrations swales will be reduced by approximately 70 %. This equates to an approximate 30% reduction in total phosphorus and total suspended solids from the entire Project Area 3 drainage area tributary to Lake Pamela. With Option B, the average annual reduction in total phosphorus and total suspended solids loading from Project Area 3 to Lake Pamela is reduced by 40 %, based on the MPCA MIDS calculator. Options A or B would also help mitigate water quality impacts to downstream Lake Pamela and Minnehaha Creek from impervious increases resulting from residential redevelopment. For Options C and D, installation of underground treatment structures within the tributary drainage area would be recommended as part of pipe upgrades, to provide pretreatment of the water prior to discharge to Lake Pamela. The opinions of probable cost for Options C and D include installation of a 96 -inch diameter sump manhole with a SAFL baffle. 4.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, C, and D. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 4 -8, are based on our experience with similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix C for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, C, and D. P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7\ STS _406- FinalReport- PAs- 1- 3 -7.doa 24 Many of the flood improvement options identified in this study have high costs. To help evaluate the costs, we have also included an estimated cost for the City to obtain the properties that do not receive a 100 -year level of protection under existing conditions. The costs to obtain the properties are summarized in Table 4 -8 and are based on the estimated market values of impacted dwellings as established by the Hennepin County assessor as of January 2, 2012. The City may also wish to consider retrofitting flood - prone residential structures as an alternative option. Retrofitting options and costs vary considerably by individual situation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed retrofitting guidance documents including Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood -Prone Residential Structures (FEMA P -259 /January 2012) and Homeowner's Guide to Retrofitting — Six Ways to Protect Your Home From Flooding (FEMA P- 312 /December 2009) that can provide additional reference information as the City considers flood improvement options. Table 4 -8 Estimated costs for West 601h Street and Chowen Avenue (Project Area 3) improvement Options A, B, C, D and buy -out option Improvement Option Estimated Cost' Option A: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; Infiltration swales in right -of. -way $1,160,000 Option B: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; Infiltration swales with storage pipe in right -of -way $1,660,000 Option C: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; New pipe on West 601h Street $830,000 Option D. New storm sewer connection to backyard area; Upsize existing storm sewer j $1,230,000 Buy -out Option' $6,210,000 1 Buy -out costs based on combined estimated market value for impacted dwellings under existing conditions for the 100 year frequency event as reported on Hennepin County property information search website. 1 Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. P: \Mpls \23 MM27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 1- 3- 7 \STS_406 FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.doa 25 5.0 Project Area 7 Morningside Subwatershed MS_17 5.1 Problem Description The backyard depression area in Subwatershed MS-17 between France Avenue and Scott Terrace is land- locked and currently is not served by City storm sewer. During large storm events, the backyard depression area becomes inundated and impacts two adjacent structures (4308 and 4312 France Avenue). 5.2 Model Updates The XP -SWMM model for Project Area 7 was updated to reflect new rainfall depths as defined by Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, additional surface overflows were added to the model to account for the increased flows. The stage- storage curve for the specific subwatershed of interest (MS- 17) was updated based on a detailed topographic survey of the backyard depression area and the 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MNDNR). 5.3 Existing Conditions Flood Risks Table 5 -1 summarizes the predicted water surface elevations in Subwatershed MS-17 for the 1 -, 2 -, 10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour duration events (under existing conditions). The 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour flood elevation is 902.6 in the backyard area. Comparison of the 100 -year flood elevation with adjacent low entry elevations surveyed by City staff indicates that two dwellings will be impacted by the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm event. The inundation area corresponding to the 100 -year frequency flood elevation is shown in Figure 5 -1. Table 5 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) in Subwatershed MS_17 and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation 24 -hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions' New pipe connecting MS_17 to existing Scott Terrace storm sewer' 1 -year 900.4(1/1) 894.2 (0/0)1 2-year 900.7(1/1) 894.4 (0/0)1 10 -year 901.5(2/1) 895.7 (0/0)1 25 -year 902(2/2) 898.4 (0/0)1 50 -year 902.4(2/2) 898.5(0/0) 100 -year 902.6(2/2) 898.6(0/0) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation amounts 2 The assumed invert of the proposed pipe is 893.3 and the ground elevation is 898.4,• therefore, all water is contained within the proposed storm sewer under this storm event. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS -406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 1 -3 -7 \STS - 406- FinalReport- PAs -1 -3 7.docx 26 5.4 Improvement Options Several improvement options were considered to reduce the flood risk in the land- locked backyard depression area, including installation of a gravity overflow Swale toward France Avenue, installation of underground storage in the backyard area, and installation of a storm sewer to connect the backyard area to the existing storm sewer approximately 500 feet north on Scott Terrace. Installation of a gravity overflow Swale toward France Avenue was not feasible due.to site topography. Installation of underground storage was also deemed not feasible, due to the limited land area available within the backyard depression area for installation of stormwater storage. Installation of a 21 -inch CPEP storm sewer to connect MS-17 with the existing storm sewer system on Scott Terrace was determined to be feasible and effective in reducing flood risk for adjacent properties (see Figure 5 -2). Table 5 -1 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations in the MS-17 backyard depression area for the 1 -, 2 -,10 -, 25 -, 50 -, and 100 -year frequency, 24 -hour rainfall events. The proposed system provides a 100 -year level of protection for all of the adjacent properties. However, connecting the MS-17 backyard area to the existing Scott Terrace storm sewer results in increased 100 -year flood elevations in several downstream subwatersheds, including MS-52 and MS-50, which is in conflict with the City's policy that prohibits exacerbating existing downstream flooding problems. 5.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs A planning level engineer's opinion of probable cost was prepared for installation of a pipe connecting MS-17 to the existing Scott Terrace storm sewer system. The opinion of probable cost summarized in Table 5 -2 is based on our experience with similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the cost is based on a planning -level design, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix D for a detailed summary of the cost estimate. Table 5 -2 also includes an estimated cost for the City to obtain the properties that do not receive a 100 -year level of protection under existing conditions. The costs to obtain the properties are summarized in Table 5 -2 based on the estimated market values of impacted dwellings as established by the Hennepin County assessor as of January 2, 2012. The City may also wish to consider retrofitting flood -prone residential structures as an alternative option. Retrofitting options and costs vary considerably by individual situation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed retrofitting guidance documents including Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood -Prone Residential Structures (FEMA P -259 /January 2012) and Homeowner's Guide to Retrofitting - Six Ways to Protect Your Home From Flooding (FEMA P- 312 /December 2009) that can provide additional reference information as the City considers flood improvement options. P: \Mpls \23 MN\ 27\ 2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS- 406\Final Reports\Projed Areas 1- 3 -7\ST5 406_FinalReport_PAs -1 3_7.docx 27 Table-5 -2 Estimated costs for Scott Terrace and France Avenue (Project Area 7) improvement option and buy -out option Improvement Option Estimated Costz' New pipe connection from MS-17 to existing Scott Terrace storm sewer system $19Q000 Buy -out Options 1 Buy -out costs based on combined estimated market value for two impacted dwellings under existing conditions for the 100 -year frequency event, as reported on Hennepin County property information search website. z Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS _406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1- 3- 7\STS _406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 28 lu Project Areas ® City of Edina Boundary C� J Feet 2,500 5,000 BARR Figure 1 -1 PROJECT STUDY AREAS ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin __# Surface Overflow 0 ---- *- Existing Storm Sewer - 100 Year 24 -Hour Event BARR 1 Inundation Area' O Subwatersheds Figure 3 -1 Parcels Feet EXISTING CONDITIONS 0 75 150 100 YEAR INUNDATION Project Area 1 - Ashcroft Lane 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ® Existing Manhole Annual Flood Risk' /Catch Basin >80% 0--► Existing Storm Sewer 50% - 80% K? Subwatersheds O 20% - 50% Parcels 10% - 20% 4% -10% 02 %-4% 1 % -2% 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 0 Feet 75 150 BARR Figure 3 -2 ANNUAL FLOOD RISK Project Area 1 -Ashcroft Lane City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin �► Existing Storm Sewer Subwatersheds OParcels *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 30 Year Flood Probability* >99% 95% - 99% 90% - 95% 75% - 90% 50% - 75% _ 26% - 50% r O Feet 75 150 UARR Figure 3 -3 CHANCE OF FLOODING OVER ATYPICAL 30 YEAR HOME MORTGAGE Project Area 1 -Ashcroft Lane City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin �► Existing Storm Sewer Option A: 100 Year 1 24 -Hour Event Inundation Area' w—O►Option A: Proposed Storm Sewer (42" Pipe) Subwatersheds Parcels 0 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet BARR QFigure 4 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT Feet OPTION A 100 200 Project Area 1 -Ashcroft Lane o City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin ►---► Existing Storm Sewer —0► 0ption B: Proposed Storm Sewer (36" Pipe) Option B: 100 Year 24 -Hour Event Inundation Area' Subwatersheds Parcels 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 0 Feet 0 75 150 BARR Figure 5 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT OPTION B Project Area 1 - Ashcroft Lane City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin Surface Overflow - 10-1- Existing Storm Sewer BARR ►Option C- Proposed Storm Sewer (4'x 12' box culvert) N Option C: 100 Year Figure 3 -6 24 -Hour Event PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Inundation Area' Feet OPTION C Subwatersheds 0 75 150 Project Area 1 - Ashcroft Lane Parcels City of Edina *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin ►---► Existing Storm Sewer - 100 Year 24 -Hour eARR Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds O Figure 3 -7 Parcels EXISTING CONDITIONS Feet 100 YEAR INUNDATION 0 150 300 Project Area 1 - Barrie Road and York Ave *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ED Existing Manhole Annual Flood Risk' /Catch Basin 180% Existing Storm Sewer 50% - 80% 1WSubwatersheds O 20% - 50% Feet 10% - 20% 150 300 �4 % -10% o =2 % -4% 1 % -2% 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet BARR OFigure -8 ANNUAL FLOOD RISK Feet Project Area 1 - 150 300 Barrie Road and York Ave o City of Edina ® Existing Manhole 30 Year Flood Risk* /Catch Basin M>99% 10-0- Existing Storm Sewer F----]95% - 99% Subwatersheds 90% - 95% 75% - 90% 50% - 75% _ 26% - 50% *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet O Feet 150 300 BARR Figure 3 -9 CHANCE OF FLOODING OVER A TYPICAL 30 YEAR HOME MORTGAGE Project Areal - Barrie Road and York Ave City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin 0--0- Existing Storm Sewer BARR �� Option A- Proposed Storm Sewer (36" pipe) Option A: 100 Year 24 -Hour Event Inundation Area (Atlas 14)` Subwatersheds 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Feet 400 800 Figure 3 -10 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT OPTION A Project Area 1 - Barrie Road and York Ave City of Edina E) Existing Manhole /Catch Basin ► —� Existing Storm Sewer Option B- Proposed Storm Sewer (48" pipe) and Additional Pump Capacity (In Subwatershed NC-88)© �t Option B: 100 Year 24 -Hour N Event Inundation Area' Subwatersheds Feet 0 400 'Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet BARR Figure 11 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT OPTION B Project Area 1 - 800 Barrie Road and York Ave City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin f�► Existing Storm Sewer Option C- Proposed Storm Sewer (36" pipe) and Underground Storage (In Subwatershed NC-88) Option C: 100 Year 24 -Hour Event Inundation Area" Subwatersheds Proposed Underground Storage Distributed Through Subwatershed NC-88 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 0 Feet 400 800 BARR Figure 3 -12 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT OPTION C Project Area 1 - Barrie Road and York Ave City of Edina ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin �► Existing Storm Sewer - 100 Year 24 -Hour BARR Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds O Figure 4 -1 Parcels EXISTING CONDITIONS Feet 100 YEAR INUNDATION 0 250 500 Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ED Existing Manhole Annual Flood Risk` /Catch Basin '80% 10—► Existing Storm Sewer O 50% - 80% Subwatersheds O 20% - 50% Parcels 10% - 20% 200 400 �4 % -10% o 02 % -4% _1 % -2% *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29. Feet BARR OFigure 4 -2 ANNUAL FLOOD RISK Feet Project Area 3 - 60th St and 200 400 Chowen Ave o City of Edina ® Existing Manhole 30 Year Flood Risk* /Catch Basin ,99% ►—� Existing Storm Sewer 95%- 99% LW Subwatersheds 90% -95% Parcels O 75% - 90% 50% - 75% _ 26% - 50% *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet O Feet 0 200 400 M BARR Figure 4 -3 CHANCE OF FLOODING OVER ATYPICAL 30 YEAR HOME MORTGAGE Project Area 3 - 60th Street and Chowen Ave City of Edina 0 Proposed Manhole /Catch Basin = Parcels ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin - B Proposed New Pipe ARB 110-40- Existing Storm Sewer Figure 4 -5 Streets with Infiltration Swales N O PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Options A and B: 100 year 24 -hour OPTIONS A AND B C-3 Event Inundation Area* Feet Project Area 3 - Subwatersheds 0 300 600 60th St and Chowen Ave City of Edina "Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Proposed Manhole /Catch Basin = Parcels ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin - -� Proposed New Pipe BARR ---P- Proposed Pipe Upgrade 1110-0- Existing Storm Sewer M Option C: 100 Year 24 -Hour l Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 0 Feet 0 200 400 Figure 4 -6 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT OPTION C Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave City of Edina Proposed Manhole /Catch Basin = Parcels ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin - -♦- Proposed New Pipe BARR Proposed Pipe Upgrade O Figure 4 -7 O F PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Option D: 100 Year 24 -Hour ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin ► —► Existing Storm Sewer 100 Year 24 -Hour Event Inundation Area' Subwatersheds �– Parcels "Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 0 Feet 0 75 150 OMMMMM BARR Figure 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 100 YEAR INUNDATION Project Area 7 - France Ave and Scott Terrace • Proposed Manhole /Catchbasin = Parcels ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin BARR -i- Proposed Storm Sewer �► Existing Storm Sewer O Figure 5 -2 Option A: 100 Year 24 -Hour PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Event Inundation Area' OPTION A (` Subwatersheds Feet Project Area 7 - 0 75 150 France Ave and Scott Terrace City of Edina `Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Appendices Appendix A Cost Estimates Project Area 1, Ashcroft Lane ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 1, OPTION "A" W. 64th ST. Northside, Ashcroft to Millers Ln. 42" Pipe STORM AND SANITARY SEWER January 21, 2014 1$" PVC SDR -35 SANITARY SEWER LN FT 655 $ 28.00 $ ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT AMOUNT UNIT.COST TOTAL COST°< MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 31,000.00 $ 31,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL- LS 1 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00' EROSION CONTROL . LS 1 $ ,4,360.00 $ 4,360.00 REMOVALS 7. $ 325.00 $ ' 19,500.00 84" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 112 $ '3.50 $ 392.00 REMOVE'BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1600 $ 2.00 $ 3,200.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN. FT 600 $ 5.00 $ 3;000.00 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER;PIPE LN FT 1260 $ 10.00 $ 12,600.00 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 6 $ 500.00 $ 3,000.00 BY -PASS PUMPING SANITARY SEWER LS 1 $ 4,500.00 $. 4,500.00 UTILITY CONFLICKS LS 1 $ .5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT STORM AND SANITARY SEWER 1$" PVC SDR -35 SANITARY SEWER LN FT 655 $ 28.00 $ 18,340.00 42" CPEP STORM SEWER LN FT 556 $ 68.00 $ 37,808.00 42" RCP -ARCH CL 2 LN FT 44 $ 192.00 $ 8,448.00 42" RCP -ARCH F.E.S. W /BN TRASH RACK EACH 1 $ 4,017.00 $ 4,017.00 48" DIA. RC STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE LN FT 60 $ 325.00 $ ' 19,500.00 84" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 20 $ 897.00 $ 17,940.00 STREET PAVEMENT SELECT GRANULAR SUBBASE CU YD 533 $ 12.00 $ 6,396.00 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 357 $ 34.00 $ 12,138.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 31 $ 20.00 $ 620.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 600 $ 13.50 $ 8,100.00 2" BITUMINOUS. BASE COURSE SQ YD 1600 $ 7.50 $ 12,000.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 1600 $ 8.50 $ 13,600.00 ADJUST.EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 8 $ 330.00 $ 2,640.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.06 $12,500.00 $ 750.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00.:$ 7,000.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 71,714.70 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 46,614.56 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 21,753.46 AREA 1, OPTION A TOTAL COST $ 379,131.71 A -1 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 1, OPTION "B" 36" STORM SEWER JACKED UNDER HWY 62 January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 34,000.00 $ 34,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 2,790.00 $ 2,790.00 REMOVALS CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 56 $ 3.50 $ 196.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 160 $ 2.00 $ 320.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 120 $ 5.00 $ 600.00 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER 36" RCP CL 2 LN FT 110 $ 110.00 $ 12,100.00 36" RCP - JACKING PIPE LN FT 220 $ 150.00 $ 33,000.00 JACKING /BORING 36" RCP UNDER HWY 62 LN FT 220 $ 600.00 $ 132,000.00 36" RCP F.E.S. W /BN TRASH RACK LN FT 2 $ 3,549.00 $ 7,098.00 84" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 12 $ 897.00 $ 10,764.00 CLASS 3 RIP RAP AND FILTER TON 30 $ 48.00 $ 1,440.00 UTILITY CONFLICKS LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE CU YD 53 $ 12.00 $ 636.00 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 36 $ 34.00 $ 1,224.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 10 $ 20.00 $ 200.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 120 $ 13.50 $ 1,620.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 160 $ 7.50 $ 1,200.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 160 $ 8.50 $ 1,360.00 ADJUST EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 2 $ 330.00 $ 660.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES - LS 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 SEEDING NATIVE GRASSES LS 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SUB TOTAL $ 258,408.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 77,522.40 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 50,389.56 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 23,515.13 AREA 1, OPTION B TOTAL COST $ 409,835.09 A -2 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 1, OPTION "C" 4'X 12' BOX CULVERT STORM SEWER OPEN CUT ACROSS HWY 62 January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST TOTAL COST $ 5,000.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 56 MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 58,000.00 $ 58,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 8,900.00 $ 8,900.00 5.00 $ 1,500.00 HWY 62 PAVEMENT EACH REMOVALS $15,000.00 300 $ 30,000.00 CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 56 $ 3.50 $ 196.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 300 $ 2.00 $ 600.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (6618) LN FT 300 $ 5.00 $ 1,500.00 HWY 62 PAVEMENT EACH 2 $15,000.00 300 $ 30,000.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 192, $ . 3.50 $ 672.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 420 $ 2.00 $ 840.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (D418) LN FT 150 $ 5.00 $ 750.00 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER CU YD 53 $ 12.00 $ 636.00 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 36" RCP CL 2 LN FT 44 $ 110.00 $ 4,840.00 4'x 12' BOX CULVERT LN FT 330 $ 758.00 $ 250,140.00 4'x 12' BOX CULVERT END SECTION LN FT 1 $ 6,208.00 $ 6,208.00 6'x 12' BOX CULVERT FLOOD INLET EACH 2 $15,000.00 300 $ 30,000.00 48" DIA. RC STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE LN FT 20 $ 325.00 $ 6,500.00 CLASS 3 RIP RAP AND FILTER TON 70 $ 48.00 $ 3,360.00 48" DIA. CATCH BASIN EACH 2 $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00 MEDIAN DRAIN EACH 2 $ 2,700.00 $ 5,400.00 ADJUST EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 2 $ 330.00 $ 660.00 UTILITY CONFLICKS LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT SEEDING TURF GRASSES LS 1 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE CU YD 53 $ 12.00 $ 636.00 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 78 $ 34.00 $ 2,652.00. TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 36 $ 20.00 $ 720.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 150 $ 13.50 $ 2,025.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 300 $ 7.50 $ 2,250.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 300 $ 8.50 $ 2,550.00 HWY 62 PAVEMENT SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE CU YD 93 $ 12.00 $ 1,116.00 12" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 93 $ 34.00 $ 3,162.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 22 $ 20.00 $ 440.00 REPLACE D418 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 150 $ 13.50 $ 2,025.00 4" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 420 $ 15.00 $ 6,300.00 4" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 420 $ 17.00 $ 7,140.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES LS 1 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 SEEDING NATIVE GRASSES LS 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SUB TOTAL $ 448,332.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 134,499.60 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 87,424.74 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 40,798.21 AREA 1, OPTION D TOTAL COST $ 711,054.55 A -3 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 1 OPTION "A" Barrie Road 36" CPEP (connecting to existing system) January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNT UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $149,000.00 $ 149,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.07 $ 12,500.00 $ 875.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL 60" CPEP - 7'- 12' DEPTH LN FT 635 $ 122.73 SILT FENCE LN FT 8330 $ 3.50 $ 29,155.00 INLET PROTECTION EACH 24 $ 350.00 $ 8,400.00 CAT. 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQ YD 339 $ 1.85 $ 626.78 REMOVALS 8,000.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 167 $ 300.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 8400 $ 3.50 $ 29,400.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 16197 $ 2.00 $ 32,394.44 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 8330 $ 5.00 $ 41,650.00 REMOVE 18" RCP LN FT 150 $ 8.00 $ 1,200.00 REMOVE 21" RCP LN FT . 635 $ 10.00 $ 6,350.00 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER 36" CPEP - 5'- 12' DEPTH LN FT 1200 $ 41.78 $ 50,138.40 36" CPEP -12' - 16' DEPTH LN FT 800 $ 56.16 $ 44,928.00 36" CPEP -16' - 24' DEPTH LN FT 1380 $ 67.46 $ 93,090.66 48" CPEP - 6'- 12' DEPTH LN FT 150 $ 73.01 $ 10,951.50 60" CPEP - 7'- 12' DEPTH LN FT 635 $ 122.73 $ 77,933.55 36" FES WITH TRASH RACK EACH 1 $ 3,549.00 $ 3,549.00 CLASS 3 RIPRAP WITH FILTER TON 30 $ 48.00 $ 1,440.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 16 $ 500.00 $ 8,000.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 167 $ 300.00 $ 50,100.00 STREET PAVEMENT AREA 1, BARRIE RD, OPTION A TOTAL COST $ 1,815,357.00 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 3617 $ 34.00 $ 122,990.91 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 56 $ 20.00 $ 1,129.33 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 8330 $ 13.50 $ 112,455.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 16197 $ 7.50 $ 121,479.17 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W /TACK SQ YD 16197 $ 8.50 $ 137,676.39 SUBTOTAL $ 1,144,613.13 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 343,384.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 223,200.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 104,160.00 AREA 1, BARRIE RD, OPTION A TOTAL COST $ 1,815,357.00 B -1 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA1 OPTION "B'' Barrie Road 48" CPEP (connecting to existing system) January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION, � ,4 . A ` UNIT I AMOUNTI,SUNIT.COST,`I -T.OTAL.COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $165,000.00 $. 165,000'00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $; 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.07 $ 12,500.00 $ 875.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE LN FT 8330 $ 3.50 $ 29,155.00 INLET PROTECTION EACH 24 $ 350.00 $ 8,400.00 CAT. 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQ YD 339 $ 1.85 $ 626.78 REMOVALS SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 8400 $ 3.50 $ 29,400.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 16197 $ 2.00 $ 32,394.44 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 8330 $ 5.00 $ 41,650.00 REMOVE 18" RCP LN FT 150 $ 8.00 $ 11200.00 REMOVE 21" RCP LN FT 635 $ 10.00 $ 6,350.00, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER 48" CPEP - 6'- 12' DEPTH LN FT 1200 $ 73.01 $ 87,617.40 48" CPEP - 12'- 16' DEPTH LN FT 800 - $ 85.85 $ 68,681.60 48" CPEP - 16'- 24' DEPTH LN FT 1380 $ 97.15 $ 134,065.62 60" CPEP - T- 12' DEPTH LN FT 785 $ 122.73 $ 96,343.05 36" FES WITH TRASH RACK EACH 1 $ 3,549.00 • $ 3,549.00 CLASS 3 RIPRAP WITH'FILTER TON 30 $ 48.00 . $ 1,440.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 16 $ 500.00 $' .8,000-00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 167 $ 300.00 $ 50,100.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD:, 3617 $ 34.00 $ 122,990.91 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 56 $ 20.00 0$ 1,129.33 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & `GUTTER LN FT 8330 $ 13.50 $ 112,455.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 16197 $ 7.50 $ 121,479.17 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 16197 $ 8.50 $ 137,676.39 SUBTOTAL $ 102701278.69 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 381,084.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .15% $ 247,704.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 115,595.00 AREA 1, BARRIE RD, OPTION B TOTAL COST $ 2,014,662.00 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 1 OPTION "B" Barrie Road Additional 3500 gpm pump capacity January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $47,000.00 $ 47,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 REMOVALS* LIFT STATION PIPING, VALVES, APPURTENANCES LS 1 $ 25,000.00 $ SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 900 $ 3.50 $ 3,150.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 2000 $ 2.00 $ 4,000.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 900 $ 5.00 $ 4,500.00 REMOVE EXISTING PUMP AND MANHOLE LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 UTILITY CONFLICTS LS 1 $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 STORM SEWER CU YD 450 $ 34.00 $ 18" DR17 HDPE PIPE LN FT 965 $ 110.00 $ 106,150.00 25 HP PUMP, 3500 GPM 18' TDH EACH 1 $40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 CONTROLS LS 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 LIFT STATION PIPING, VALVES, APPURTENANCES LS 1 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 96" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 10 $ 1,156.00 $ 11,560.00 STREET PAVEMENT $ 359,810.00 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 450 $ 34.00 $ 15,300.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 900 $ 13.50 $ 12,150.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 2000 $ 7.50 $ 15,000.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 2000 $ 8.50 $ 17,000.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SUB TOTAL $ 359,810.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 107,943.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 70,163.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 32,743.00 AREA 1, BARRIE ROAD OPTION B TOTAL COST $ 570,659.00 *This cost estimate includes removing and replacing all roadway materials. B -3 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 1 OPTION "C" Barrie Road Stormtech Underground Storage January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.4 $ 12,500.00 $ 5,531.52 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE LN FT 1869 $ 3.50 $ 6,541.50 INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $ 350.00 $ 700.00 CAT. 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQ YD 2142 $ 1.85 $ 3,962.34 REMOVALS SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 4602 $ 3.50 $ 16,107.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 3584 $ 2.00 $ 7,167.50 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 3315 $ 5.00 $ 16,575.00 STRIP AND REMOVE SOD AC 0.4 $ 3.00 $ 1.33 REMOVE TREE EACH 5 $ 400.00 $ 2,000.00 REMOVE AND REPLACE SIGN EACH 3 $ 450.00 $ 1,350.00 REMOVE AND REPLACE STREET LIGHT EACH 3 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER STORMTECH CHAMBERS CF 88863 $ 9.00 $ 799,767.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 14 $ 500.00 $ 7,000.00 REMOVE 24" RCP LN FT 425 $ 15.00 $ 6,375.00 REMOVE 10" FORCE MAIN LN FT 425 $ 9.00 $ 3,825.00 BULKHEAD EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 NEW FORCEMAIN LIN FT 425 $ 110.00 $ 46,750.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 800 $ 34.00 $ 27,212.61 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 357 $ 20.00 $ 7,139.35 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 3315 $ 13.50 $ 44,752.50 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 3584 $ 7.50 $ 26,878.13 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE WRACK SQ YD 3584 $ 8.50 $ 30,461.88 SUBTOTAL $ 1,232,297.65 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 369,689.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 240,298.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 112,139.00 AREA 1, BARRIE RD, OPTION C TOTAL COST $ 1,954,424.00 B-4 Appendix C Cost Estimates Project Area 3, West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 3, OPTION "A" Living Streets Alternate, 8" Swales with 12" pipe January 21, 2014 I ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 95,000.00 $ 95,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 REMOVALS* SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 867 $ 3.50 $ 3,034.50 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQYD 1927 $ 2.00 $ 3,854.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 867 $ 5.00 $ 4,335.00 EARTHWORK AND RESTORATION EXCAVATION CU YD 1750 $ 15.00 $ 26,250.00 AMMENDED SOIL CU YD 1750 $ 35.00 $ 61,250.00 UTILITY CONFLICTS LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 SOD SQ YD 9750 $ 4.00 $ 39,000.00 STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 8 $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00 12" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 8000 $ 15.61 $ 124,880.00 24" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 1033 $ 30.00 $ 30,990.00 30" CATCH BASIN EACH 117 $ 2,000.00 $ 234,000.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 24 $ 300.00 $ 7,200.00 48" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 20 $ 300.00 $ 6,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 430 $ 34.00 $ 14,620.00 REPLACE 8618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 867 $ 13.50 $ 11,704.50 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQYD 1927 $ 7.50 $ 14,452.50 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W /TACK SQYD 1927 $ 8.50 $ 16,379.50 SUBTOTAL $ 731,950.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 219,585.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 142,730.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 66,607.00 AREA 3, OPTION A TOTAL COST $ 1,160,872.00 *Estimate includes pavement removal and replacement for Chowen Ave north of 60th St C -1 ' ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 3, OPTION "B" . Living Streets Alternate, 8" Swales with 36" pipe storage January 21, 2014 ' --TOTAL COST: - ITEM;DESCRIPTION "' UNIT AMOUNT` UNIT COST` MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 136,000.00 $ 136,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 REMOVALS" SAW'CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT` LN FT 867 $ 3.50 $. 3,034.50 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQYD 1927 $ 2.00 $ 3,854.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 867 $ 5.00 $ 4,335':00 EARTHWORK AND RESTORATION EXCAVATION CUYD 1750 $ 15.00 $ 26,250.00 . Am MENDED SOIL CUYD 1750 $ - 35.00 $ 61,250.00 UTILITY CONFLICTS LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 ' SOD SQYD 9750 $ 4.00 $ -39,000.00 STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING°STORM SEWER EACH 8 $ 500.00 $ .` 4,00.0.00 36" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 8000 $ 51.84 $ 414,720.00 24" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to42' deep LN FT 1033 $ 30.00 $ 30,990.00 24" Inline Drain - StormTech EACH 117 $ 1,750.00 . $ 204,750.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT � 24 $ 300.00 $ 7,200.00 84" DIA. RC MANHOLE' LN FT 20 $. 897.00 $. 17,940.00 STREET PAVEMENT " 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CUYD 430' $ 34.00 $ 14,620.00 REPLACE 8618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 867 $ 13.50 $ 11,704.50 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 'SQYD 1927 $ 7.50 $ 14,452.50 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W /TACK SQYD ".1927 $ 8.50 $ 16,379.50 SUBTOTAL $ 1,045,480:00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 313,644.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 203,869.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 95,139.00 AREA 3, OPTION B TOTAL COST $' 1,658,132.00 , *.Estimate includes pavement removal and replacement for Chowen Ave north of 60th St C -2 d � ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 3, OPTION "C" 60th Street to France into Lake Pamela January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION >UNIT- `[AMOUNT UNIT,COST I TOTALCOST;( 3.50 $ 4,032.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 68,000.00 $ 68,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 REMOVALS' SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 1152 $ 3.50 $ 4,032.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SQYD 2560 $ 2.00 $ 5,120.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 1152 $ 5.00 $ 5,760.00 REMOVE CONC. WALK SQYD 160 $ 2.75 $ 440.00 REMOVE 18" RCP LN FT 310 $ 9.00 $ 2,790.00 REMOVE 42" RCP LN FT 478 $ 20.00 $ 9,560.00 REMOVE MANHOLE STRUCTURES EACH 5 $ 500.00 $ 2,500.00 UTILITY CONFLICTS LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 4 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 36" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 1033 $ 51.84 $ 53,550.72 48" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 771 $ 73.60 $ 56,283.00 48" CPEP STORM SEWER, 12' to 16' deep LN FT 328 $ 85.85 $ 28,158.80 48" CPEP STORM SEWER, 16' to 24' deep LN FT 913 $ 97.15 $ 88,697.95 Headwall at 60" CPEP LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 60" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 20 $ 650.00 $ 13,000.00 84" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 37 $ 897.00 $ 33,189.00 96" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT _ 42 $ 1,156.00 $ 48,552.00 108" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 16 $ 1,828.00 $ .29,248.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH,BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 128 $ 300.00 $ . 38,400.00 96" SAFL BAFFLE EACH 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 570 $ 34.00 $ 19,380.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB &GUTTER LN FT 1152 $ 13.50 $ 15,552.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQYD 2560 $ 7.50 $ 19,200.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W /TACK SQYD 2560 $ 8.50 $ 21,760.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 120 $ 20.00 $ 2,400.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.07 $ 12,500.00. $ 875.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 SUBTOTAL 522,536.00 7 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 156,761.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 101,895.00• CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 47,551.00: AREA 3, ,OPTION C TOTAL COST $ 828,743.00 *Estimate includes pavement removal and replacement for France Ave and Chowen Ave north of 60th St C -3 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 31 OPTION "D" Chowen Avenue to 61st Street, France into Lake Pamela January 21, 2014 "ITEM`DESCRIP_TION - UNIT tij,''AMOUNTJ - UNITsCOST ,16 TOTALCOST; ;( MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 101,000.00 $ 101,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10;000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1, $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 REMOVALS* SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 1152 $ 3.50 $ 4,032.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQYD 1536 $ 2.00 $ 3,072.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B =618) LN FT 1152 $ 5.00 $ . 5,760.00 .REMOVE 6" CONC-.'WALK SQYD 160 $ 2.75 $ 440.00 REMOVE 24" RCP LN FT 1440 $ 10.00 $ 14,400.00 REMOVE 42" RCP LN FT 470 $ 20.00 $ 9,400.00 REMOVE'MANHOLE STRUCTURES EACH 9 $ 500.00 $ 4,500.00 UTILITY CONFLICTS '• � LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH .12 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 36" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 1033 $' 51.84 $ 53,550.72 60" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7' to 12' deep LN FT 1739 $ 123.00 $ 233,897.00 60" CPEP STORM SEWER, 12' to.16' deep LN FT 173 $ 134.00 $ 23,182.00 Headwall at 60" CPEP LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 84" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 14 $ 897.00 $ 12,558.00 96" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 17 $ 1,156.00 $ 19,652.00 108" DIA. RC: MANHOLE LN FT 83 $ 1,828.00 $ 151,724.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 96 $ 300.00 $ 28,800.00 96" SAFL BAFFLE EACH 1 ,. $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 340 $ 34.00 $ 11,560.00 REPLACE 8618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 1152 $ 13.50 $ 15,552.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQYD 1536 $ 7.50 $ 11,520.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W /TACK SQYD, 1536 $ 8.50 $ 13,056.00 6" CONCRETE WALK SQYD 160 $. 45.00 $ 7,200.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 120 $ 20.00 $ 2,400.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0:07 $ 12,500.00 $ 875.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 SUBTOTAL $" 776,130.72 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 232,839.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 151,345.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 70,628.00 AREA 3, OPTION D TOTAL COST $ 1,230,942.72 *Estimate includes pavement removal and replacement for France Ave and Chowen Ave north of 60th St C4 Appendix D Cost Estimates Project Area 7, France Avenue and Scott Terrace ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 7, OPTION "A "' 21" RCP* January 21, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNTI UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 UTILITY CONFLICTS LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 21" CPEP STORM SEWER, 7'to 12' deep LN FT 800 $ 73.00 $ 58,400.00 60" DIA. RC MANHOLE LN FT 24 $ 650.00 $ 15,600.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 5 $ 300.00 $ 1,500.00 60" SAFL BAFFLE EACH 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 RESTORATION TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 75 $ 20.00 $ 1,500.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.05 $ 12,500.00 $ 625.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 SUBTOTAL $ 122,125.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 36,638.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 23,814.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 11,113.00 AREA 7, OPTION A TOTAL COST $ 193,690.00 *Pavement removal and replacement is not included in this cost estimate D -1 Traffic Safety Committee Report Wednesday, June 4, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on April 02. The City Engineer, Police Traffic Supervisor, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Intern, and the Director of Public Works were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 19 Edina Transportation Commission and the July 15th City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request to retime pedestrian walk phase at intersection of 77th Street and Burgundy Place (access drives) This request concerns pedestrian crossing times for crossing 77th Avenue. The current total pedestrian phase is 30 seconds, with 12 seconds a walk sign and 18 seconds as the pedestrian clearance interval. The street from push button to edge of traveled way is 98 feet wide along the crosswalk on the west side of the intersection; the east side is 74 feet. (North side is 68 feet wide and has a 12 second pedestrian clearance time). MNMUTCD 4E.6 Guidance : • The pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to allow a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk who left the curb or shoulder at the end of the WALKING PERSON (symbolizing WALK) signal indication to travel at a walking speed of 3.5 feet per second, to at least the far side of the traveled way. • When edestrians who walk' p _ n. _ slower than 3.5 feet per Map: pedestrian crossings at W. 77th Street and Burgundy Place second, or pedestrians who use wheelchairs, routinely use the crosswalk, a walking speed of less than 3.5 feet per second should be considered in determining the pedestrian clearance time. • Except as provided in below, the walk interval should be at least seven seconds in length so that pedestrians will have an adequate opportunity to leave the curb or shoulder before the Traffic Safety report Page 1 of 4 June 4, 2014 pedestrian clearance time begins. OPTION: If pedestrian volumes and characteristics do not require a 7- second walk interval, walk intervals as short as 4 seconds may be used. • The total of the walk interval and the pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to allow a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk who left the pedestrian detector at the beginning of the WALKING PERSON (symbolizing WALK) signal indication to travel at a speed of 3 feet per second to the far side of the traveled way being crossed. Any additional time that is required to satisfy the conditions of this paragraph should be added to the walk interval. Following the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards, timing should be 5 seconds of WALK and 28 seconds of pedestrian clearance time. After discussion, staff recommends retiming the pedestrian signal to conform with MNMUTCD standards and to avoid a significant negative effect on the traffic flow in the area. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: B1. Request to add "Children At Play" sign at the intersection of Wood End Drive and France Avenue. This request comes from a builder working on a residence on Wood End Drive, concerned for children's safety when he starts hauling the house demolition materials, asked for a "Children At Play" sign to be installed. Neither the national nor the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) recognizes the sign. A state that does recognize the sign is New York, which states that the sign should only be used in areas where children playing in the street would be unexpected. Map: Wood End Drive and France Avenue This road is a cul -de -sac, with no sidewalk, and has several houses with play equipment in their front yards. There is a "No Outlet" sign located on the road, and the road bends to the south soon after the intersection. After discussion, staff recommends denying the request based on the lack of guidance in the the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Minnesota. Photo: Entrance to Wood End Drive from France Avenue Traffic Safety report Page 2 of 4 June 4, 2014 B2. Request to change winter, overnight parking restrictions. This request comes from a resident, who initially made the request at the December 3, 2013 City Council Meeting. The requestor lives on the 4200 block of Grimes Avenue and wishes to repeal the seasonal overnight parking ban and to enhance City authority to prohibit parking in the event of a snowfall. The resident proposed enforcing the ban only on nights when snow is forecasted (i.e. a "snow emergency" declaration). The requestor conducted research and states that overnight on- street parking is a valuable asset and that the ban is "unique among Twin Cities municipalities." He also states that the ban (in particular the 1:OOam time) has a negative effect on social gatherings and is a safety concern. Requestor says that "a guest who has been drinking is poised with a decision between potentially allowing their vehicle to be towed and moving their car while drunk." Included with the resident's research is the attached proposed modification to the parking ordinance (written by the requestor). After discussion, staff recommends denying the request, based on current ease of enforcement and snow removal, as well as the relative difficulty of both these in nearby communities that declare snow emergencies. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date: C1. Request to remove "No Pedestrian" pictorial signs from the intersection of 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue, and to install pedestrian signals This request concerns the bus stops on 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue and the pedestrian environment of the intersection. Currently there are near side bus stops, and signs banning pedestrians from crossing the north, south and east approaches. The concern is that a law- abiding user of transit would be unable to use the bus stops, due to the ban on pedestrian movements. Specifically the north and east approaches were requested to have their signs removed and pedestrian signals installed. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, section 26.51, addressing such signs states in the support section that the sign is intended to be used on only one leg of an intersection, in order to provide access. Photo: 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue, looking west Traffic Safety report Page 3 of 4 June 4, 2014 After discussion, staff recommends further study of the intersection to see how more pedestrian access might affect the level of service of the intersection, and to evaluate this request with others that have been received on this intersection. UrTInN r)- Other traffic safety issues handled. N � Map of bus stops located at W. 77th Street and Parklown Avenue D1. Request was made to revise traffic signal timing for northbound France Avenue left turn signal at TH 62. Voicemail was left with requestor, referring her to Hennepin County, who operates the traffic signals at this location. D2. Request was made to EPD to install a red flag on the stop sign at W. 60th Street and C.howen Avenue, due to increased traffic resulting from the Xerxes Avenue bridge closure. Requestor was informed that these measures are typically taken when traffic control changes and not for a temporary condition. D3. A resident called regarding the yield sign located at the southbound ramps onto TH 100 from Vernon Avenue /Eden Avenue. She stated that it is dangerous as motorists often do not yield at that location, where two ramps converge. Her request was forwarded to MnDOT. D4. A resident called with a concern for severe speeding on Mirror Lakes Drive between Hidden Lane and Ayshire Blvd. A speed study was done and results were forwarded to EPD for enforcement. D5. A resident called requesting that the "Disabled Child" signs be removed from the 6300 block of Wilryan Avenue, stating that the resident who had originally requested the signs had recently moved. This was verified, and the signs were removed by public works staff. Traffic Safety report Page 4 of 4 June 4, 2014 Traffic Safety Committee Report Wednesday, June 4, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on April 02. The City Engineer, Police Traffic Supervisor, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Intern, and the Director of Public Works were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 19 Edina Transportation Commission and the July 15 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request to retime pedestrian walk phase at intersection of 77th Street and Burgundy Place (access drives) This request concerns pedestrian crossing times for crossing 77th Avenue. The current total pedestrian phase is 30 seconds, with 12 seconds a walk sign and 18 seconds as the pedestrian clearance interval. The street from push button to edge of traveled way is 98 feet wide along the crosswalk on the west side of the intersection; the east side is 74 feet. (North side is 68 feet wide and has a 12 second pedestrian clearance time). MNMUTCD 4E.6 Guidance : • The pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to allow a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk who left the curb or shoulder at the end of the WALKING PERSON (symbolizing WALK) signal indication to travel at a walking speed of 3.5 feet per second, to at least the far side of the traveled way. When pedestrians who walk slower than 3.5 feet per Map: pedestrian crossings at W. 77th Street and Burgundy Place second, or pedestrians who use wheelchairs, routinely use the crosswalk, a walking speed of less than 3.5 feet per second should be considered in determining the pedestrian clearance time. • Except as provided in below, the walk interval should be at least seven seconds in length so that pedestrians will have an adequate opportunity to leave the curb or shoulder before the Traffic Safety report Page 1 of 4 June 4, 2014 r pedestrian clearance time begins. OPTION: If pedestrian volumes and characteristics do not require a 7- second walk interval, walk intervals as short as 4 seconds may be used. • The total of the walk interval and the pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to allow a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk who left the pedestrian detector at the beginning of the WALKING PERSON (symbolizing WALK) signal indication to travel at a speed of 3 feet per second to the far side of the traveled way being crossed. Any additional time that is required to satisfy the conditions of this paragraph should be added to the walk interval. Following the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards, timing should be 5 seconds of WALK and 28 seconds of pedestrian clearance time. After discussion, staff recommends retiming the pedestrian signal to conform with MNMUTCD standards and to avoid a significant negative effect on the traffic flow in the area. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: 131. Request to add "Children At Play" sign at the intersection of Wood End Drive and France Avenue. This request comes from a builder working on a residence on Wood End Drive, concerned for children's safety when he starts hauling the house demolition materials, asked for a "Children At Play" sign to be installed. Neither the national nor the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) recognizes the sign. A state that does recognize the sign is New York, which states that the sign should only be used in areas where children playing in the street would be unexpected. Map: Wood End Drive and France Avenue This road is a cul -de -sac, with no sidewalk, and has several houses with play equipment in their front yards. There is a "No Outlet" sign located on the road, and the road bends to the south soon after the intersection. After discussion, staff recommends denying the request based on the lack of guidance in the the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Minnesota. Photo: Entrance to Wood End Drive from France Avenue Traffic Safety report Page 2 of 4 June 4, 2014 r B2. Request to change winter, overnight parking restrictions. This request comes from a resident, who initially made the request at the December 3, 2013 City Council Meeting. The requestor lives on the 4200 block of Grimes Avenue and wishes to repeal the seasonal overnight parking ban and to enhance City authority to prohibit parking in the event of a snowfall. The resident proposed enforcing the ban only on nights when snow is forecasted (i.e. a "snow emergency" declaration). The requestor conducted research and states that overnight on- street parking is a valuable asset and that the ban is "unique among Twin Cities municipalities." He also states that the ban (in particular the 1:OOam time) has a negative effect on social gatherings and is a safety concern. Requestor says that "a guest who has been drinking is poised with a decision between potentially allowing their vehicle to be towed and moving their car while drunk." Included with the resident's research is the attached proposed modification to the parking ordinance (written by the requestor). After discussion, staff recommends denying the request, based on current ease of enforcement and snow removal, as well as the relative difficulty of both these in nearby communities that declare snow emergencies. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date: PIP, C1. Request to remove "No Pedestrian" pictorial signs from the intersection of 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue, and to install pedestrian signals This request concerns the bus stops on 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue and the pedestrian environment of the intersection. Currently there are near side bus stops, and signs banning pedestrians from crossing the north, south and east approaches. The concern is that a law- abiding user of transit would be unable to use the bus stops, due to the ban on pedestrian movements. Specifically the north and east approaches were requested to have their signs removed and pedestrian signals installed. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, section 213.51, addressing such signs states in the support section that the sign is intended to be used on only one leg of an intersection, in order to provide access. Photo: 77`x' Street and Parklawn Avenue, looking west Traffic Safety report Page 3 of 4 June 4, 2014 After discussion, staff recommends further study of the intersection to see how more pedestrian access might affect the level of service of the intersection, and to evaluate this request with others that have been received on this intersection. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. T., Map of bus stops located at W. 77th Street and Parklown Avenue D1. Request was made to revise traffic signal timing for northbound France Avenue left turn signal at TH 62. Voicemail was left with requestor, referring her to Hennepin County, who operates the traffic signals at this location. D2. Request was made to EPD to install a red flag on the stop sign at W. 60th Street and Chowen Avenue, due to increased traffic resulting from the Xerxes Avenue bridge closure. Requestor was informed that these measures are typically taken when traffic control changes and not for a temporary condition. D3. A resident called regarding the yield sign located at the southbound ramps onto TH 100 from Vernon Avenue /Eden Avenue. She stated that it is dangerous as motorists often do not yield at that location, where two ramps converge. Her request was forwarded to MnDOT. D4. A resident called with a concern for severe speeding on Mirror Lakes Drive between Hidden Lane and Ayshire Blvd. A speed study was done and results were forwarded to EPD for enforcement. D5. A resident called requesting that the "Disabled Child" signs be removed from the 6300 block of Wilryan Avenue, stating that the resident who had originally requested the signs had recently moved. This was verified, and the signs were removed by public works staff. Traffic Safety report Page 4 of 4 June 4, 2014 w M .- l l- ` � jJ t AM im"al _ " STS -406 Improvement Project Part 2: Project Areas 4 and 5 May 28, 2014 Contents 1.0 Project Background ................................................................................................................................... ..............................1 2.0 Project Approach ....................................................................................................................................... ..............................2 2.1 Flood Protection ............................................................................................................................ ..............................2 2.1.1 Changes to Published Precipitation Depths .................................. ............................... 2 2.1.2 Updated Elevation Data ................................................................ ............................... 3 3.0 Project Area 4— Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (Southwest Ponds Catchment) ........ ..............................4 3.1 Problem Description ..................................................................................................................... ..............................4 3.2 Model Updates ............................................................................................................................... ..............................6 3.3 Existing Conditions Flooding .................................................................................................... ..............................6 3.4 Improvement Options ................................................................................................................. ..............................6 3.4.1 Option A: Providing Additional Flood Storage in Lewis Park Storage Area .................. 7 3.4.2 Option B: Providing Additional Upstream Storage ........................ ............................... 8 3.4.3 Option C: Increasing Flow from Lewis Park Storage Area ............. ............................... 8 3.4.4 Option D: Localized Flood Proofing ............................................... ............................... 9 3.4.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost ............................................. ............................... 9 3.4.6 Water Quality Considerations ....................................................... ............................... 9 4.0 Project Area 5 —Sally Lane and Paiute Pass ................................................................................... .............................11 4.1 Problem Description .................................................................................................................... .............................11 4.1.1 Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Intersection (NMSB_83, NMSB_ 84) ... .............................11 4.1.2 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard Depression Area (NMSB_70) ............................11 4.2 Model Updates .............................................................................................................................. .............................12 4.3 Existing Conditions Flooding ................................................................................................... .............................12 4.4 Improvement Options ................................................................................................................ .............................12 4.4.1 Option A: Install Additional Pipe from Backyard Depression Area ............................13 4.4.2 Option B: Increase Capacity of Sally Lane Storm Sewer .............. ............................... 14 4.4.3 Option C: Construct Surface Overflow Channels from Sally Lane . .............................14 4.4.4 Flood Benefits .............................................................................. ............................... 14 4.4.5 Engineer's Opinions of Probable Costs ....................................... ............................... 15 4.4.6 Water Quality Benefits .................................................................. .............................16 P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \workFiles \2013 \STS_4O6\Final ReportsWroject Areas 4 -5 \13roject Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx i List of Tables Table 2 -1 24 -hour duration rainfall depths using NOAA Atlas 14 for Edina, MN for a range of storm recurrenceintervals ..............................................................:..................................................... ..............................3 Table 3 -1 Estimated cost for Cahill and Dewey (Project Area 4) improvement Option A .. ..............................9 Table 4 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation ........12 Table 4 -2 100 -year, 24 -hour maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at thatcorresponding elevation ................................................................................................ .............................15 Table 4 -3 100 -year, 24 -hour peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Sally Lane improvementOptions A, B, and C ....................................................................................... .............................15 Table 4 -4 Estimated costs for Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (Project Area 5) improvement Options A, B, and C .......................................................................................................................................... .............................16 List of Embedded Figures Figure 2 -1 Atlas 14 percent of change in precipitation depth for the 24 -hour duration storm, as comparedto TP 40 ..................................................................................................................... ..............................2 Figure 3 -1 The loading dock area of FilmTec Corporation's (5400 Dewey Hill Road) parking lot whereflooding can occur frequently .................................................................................. ..............................5 Figure 3 -2 The lobby area of FilmTec Corporation (5400 Dewey Hill Road) where flooding has occurred.......................................................................................................................................... ..............................5 Figure 3 -4 The relationship between elevation and flood storage volume in the Lewis Park storage area (subwatersheds SWP_34, SWP_35, SWP_46, SWP_46X, SWP_21, SWP_48, SWP_17, SWP_5, and SWP_14) ................................................................................................................. ..............................7 List of Attached Figures Figure 1 -1 Project Study Areas Figure 3 -3 Existing Conditions 100 -Year Inundation, Project Area 4— Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road Figure 3 -5 Proposed Improvement Option A, Project Area 4— Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road Figure 4 -1 Existing Conditions 100 -Year Inundation, Project Area 5 —Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Figure 4 -2 Proposed Improvement Options A and B, Project Area 5 —Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Figure 4 -3 Proposed Improvement Options A and C, Project Area 5 —Sally Lane and Paiute Pass List of Appendices Appendix A Cost Estimate – Project Area 4- Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road Appendix B Cost Estimates – Project Area 5 -Sally Lane and Paiute Pass P.\Mpls\23 MM27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS- 406\Final Reports\Projed Areas 4- 5\Projed Areas 4 and 5 Final Reportdoa ii 1.0 Project Background The City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) was developed to address current and future stormwater issues, especially those related to future development and redevelopment. The plan addresses stormwater runoff management and flood control, water quality management, and wetlands protection through establishment of stormwater planning policies and recommendations. This plan serves as a master plan for the City's water resources management and storm drainage system improvements. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan ( CWRMP) is to provide stormwater runoff management and flood control. The CWRMP establishes design criteria for the City's preferred level of service for stormwater management and level of protection from flooding provided to residents of the city. These design criteria serve as a target for the City as redevelopment occurs and infrastructure improvements are considered. Another goal of the CWRMP is to provide water quality management for the water bodies throughout the city. Water quality management policies and design standards have also been established to protect the water quality of the waterbodies within the city. The CWRMP identifies several areas throughout the city where the desired 100 -year level of flood protection may not currently be provided, based on results of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analyses conducted as part of the CWRMP development. Since identification of these areas, the City has been evaluating flood improvement options on a case -by -case basis, in conjunction with nearby street reconstruction or other improvement projects. The STS -406 Improvement Project includes a detailed evaluation of several areas with high flood potential that correspond to anticipated street reconstruction projects within the upcoming 5 years. This report summarizes our flood protection analyses and conclusions for the following project areas within the STS -406 Improvement Project: (1) Project Area 4 — Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (2) Project Area 5 — Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Locations of Project Areas 4 and 5 are shown in Figure 1 -1. All elevations included in this report reflect Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations in feet using the NGVD 29 vertical datum. P. \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \13roject Areas 4 and 5 Final RepoRdou 2.0 Project Approach 2.1 Flood Protection Detailed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the flood areas within Project Areas 4 and 5 was conducted using the XP -SWMM models that were originally developed in 2003 as part of the CWRMP. Updates made to the models as part of this project are described below and within the subsequent sections of this report. 2.1.1 Changes to Published Precipitation Depths In 2013, NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) published new precipitation frequency estimates ( "Atlas 14 ") for the state of Minnesota and other Midwestern states. The Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates, which are'the estimated rainfall depths for various rainfall durations and exceedance probabilities, replace the precipitation estimates published in Technical Paper No. 40 Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States ( "TP 40 "). The Atlas 14 rainfall frequency estimates indicate a significant increase in the depth of the 50 -year and 100 -year frequency rainfall events (i.e., rainfall events with exceedance probabilities of 2% and 1 %, respectively) across Minnesota and neighboring states, as compared with TP 40 estimates. For the Minneapolis /St. Paul area, the increases in 24 -hour duration precipitation depths over TP 40 are as high 25% (Figure 2 -1). These precipitation depth increases are of concern, as they can have serious implications for how stormwater systems are designed and managed. Figure 2 -1 Atlas 14 percent of change in precipitation depth for the 24 -hour duration storm, as compared to TP 40 The hydrologic and hydraulic modeling conducted for and summarized in the CWRMP used a 24 -hour rainfall depth of 6.0 inches based on TP 40, and the SCS Type II nested distribution. For this project, the rainfall depths used in the models were updated based on Atlas 14 precipitation estimates for Edina (Table 2 -1). A nested rainfall distribution was developed using precipitation frequency estimates for Edina (Coordinates: 44.8716, - 93.3762). The depth- duration data were downloaded from NOAA's Precipitation Frequency Data Server (PFDS) at httl2:Hdil2per.nws.noaa.gov /hdsc /pfds /. Nested distributions for selected P. \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \13roject Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.dou recurrence intervals events were created by using the Frequency Storm utility found in the meteorological modeling component of HEC -HMS to produce 24 -hour hyetographs with 5- minute intervals. Flood frequency data is often also described in terms of a percentage of risk, or annual exceedance probability. For example, the 100 -year frequency flood inundation area represents an area that has a 1 percent chance of flooding (1- percent - annual chance flood) for any given year. Structures located within the 1- percent - annual chance flood inundation area have a 26 percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30 -year mortgage. Table 2 -1 24 -hour duration rainfall depths using NOAA Atlas 14 for Edina, MN for a range of storm recurrence intervals Storm Recurrence Interval 24 -hour Rainfall Depth (inches) Annual Exceedance Probability' 1-year 2.5 100% 2 -year 2.9 50% 10 -year 4.3 10% 25 -year 5.4 4% 50 -year 6.4 2% 100 -year 7.5 1% 1 Annual Exceedonce Probability refers to the percent chance of occurrence in any given year 2.1.2 Updated Elevation Data For each of the study areas, City staff conducted a topographic field survey of the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The topographic survey data was combined with 2011 LiDAR elevation data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) to refine the elevation /storage relationships used in the modeling analyses. The City's survey also included low entry elevations for structures adjacent to the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The low entry elevations were used to define the flood improvement target elevations. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4- 5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 3.0 Project Area 4— Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (Southwest Ponds Catchment) Project Area 4 is located near Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (Figure 1 -1) and is located within the Southwest Ponds major drainage area. The Southwest Ponds watershed encompasses approximately 411 acres. The land use within the watershed is mainly low- and medium - density residential, in addition to the commercial and industrial area on the eastern portion of the watershed along Cahill Road and Lewis Park (located west of Cahill Road and north of Dewey Hill Road). The watershed is characterized by a series of ponding basins, that ultimately outlet to the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek via a storm sewer system that travels southward from the intersection of West 78th Street and Delaney Boulevard and discharges into a detention pond north of Interstate 494. Discharge from this detention pond flows beneath Interstate 494 and enters the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek. 3.1 Problem Description The primary objective of this evaluation was to identify opportunities to reduce the potential for flooding in the low area on Cahill Road just north of Dewey Hill Road and in the parking lot of 5400 Dewey Hill Road, a FilmTec Corporation property (FilmTec). The ponds and ball fields within Lewis Park, located north of Dewey Hill Road and west of Cahill Road, serve as regional flood storage for the Southwest Ponds major drainage area. When water levels in the Lewis Park pond (SWP_35) and adjacent ball fields get high enough, flood waters extend eastward onto Cahill Road and into the FilmTec parking lot, inundating the parking lot and causing flooding problems in the loading dock area and lobby. Figure 3 -1 is an image of FilmTec, showing the loading docks at the west end of the parking lot and Figure 3 -2 is an image of the lobby at the east end of the parking lot. Anecdotal information from FilmTec staff indicates that in the past 9 years that FilmTec Corporation has occupied this property, the lobby has flooded about once every three or four years. Figure 3 -3 shows the subwatersheds and existing storm sewer within the study area. Stormwater runoff from Cahill Road (subwatershed SWP_46) currently drains to the pond just north of Dewey Hill Road in Lewis Park (SWP_35) via a 42 -inch storm sewer system. A separate 24 -inch storm sewer system conveys runoff from the parking lot and low area of the FilmTec parking lot (subwatershed SWP_46X) to the Lewis Park pond (SWP_35). The Lewis Park pond discharges southward under Dewey Hill Road and through a subsequent series of ponds and wetlands. The normal water level of the Lewis Park Pond (SWP_35) is currently controlled at 828 feet by the outlet structure of the pond on the south side of Dewey Hill Road (SWP_5). P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013\STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4- 5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Reportdoa 4 Figure 3 -1 The loading dock area of FilmTec Corporation's (5400 Dewey Hill Road) parking lot where flooding can occur frequently i Figure 3 -2 The lobby area of FilmTec Corporation (5400 Dewey Hill Road) where flooding has occurred P: \Mpls \23 MM27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.doa 3.2 Model Updates The XP -SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model for Project Area 4 was updated to reflect updated rainfall depths as defined by NOAA Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, several additional overflows were added to the model within and around the Project Area 4 study area. The City provided topographic survey at the intersection of Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road, as well as within the parking lot of FilmTec Corporation to define critical elevations. This information was used in conjunction with the MNDNR's 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset to update the stage - storage relationships in the model for subwatersheds within and around the Project Area 4 study area. The storm sewer information in the model, particularly regarding pipes from FilmTec's parking lot, was also updated based on additional information provided by the City. 3.3 Existing Conditions Flooding Figure 3 -3 shows the predicted inundation areas throughout the Project Area 4 study area for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event. As shown in the figure, nearly all of Lewis Park becomes inundated, along with nearby Cahill and Dewey Hill Roads and the FilmTec parking lot. The predicted 100 -year, 24 -hour water surface elevation within the Lewis Park storage area and the surrounding hydraulically connected areas, including the FilmTec property, is 834.3 feet. This peak water surface elevation exceeds the surveyed low -entry elevation of 832.8 feet at FilmTec. This is the elevation at which stormwater reaches: (a) the loading docks at FilmTec (Figure 3 -1), potentially causing inflow and infiltration (I/I) into the City sanitary sewer system via the floor drains of the loading dock area, and (b) FilmTec's lobby area located at the southeast corner of the building (Figure 3 -2). Review of the modeling results indicate potential flooding in subwatershed SWP_60 as a result of the updated precipitation depths and resulting increased flood elevations in the SWP_40 pond and adjacent SWP_60 low area. The 100 -year, 24 -hour maximum water surface elevation in both SWP_40 and SWP_60 is 837.8 feet, which appears to potentially impact townhome structures along Oak Glen Road west of Cahill Road. 3.4 Improvement Options Multiple improvement options were evaluated for their ability to provide a 100 -year level of protection to the FilmTec property. As mentioned above, the ponds and ball fields within and near Lewis Park serve as regional flood storage for the Southwest Ponds drainage area. Figure 3 -4 shows the relationship between elevation and flood storage volume in the Lewis Park storage area ( subwatersheds SWP_34, SWP_35, SWP_46, SWP_46X, SWP_21, SWP_48, SWP_17, SWP_5, and SWP_14). Under existing conditions, approximately 81 acre -feet of flood storage is provided in the Lewis Park storage area between the 100 -year flood elevation of 834.3 feet and the control elevation of 828 feet. Reducing the 100 -year flood elevation of the Lewis Park storage area to an elevation below the low -entry elevation at FilmTec (832.8 feet) would result in a loss of approximately 36 acre -feet of flood storage, requiring that volume of water to be managed some other way (Figure 3 -4). P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS _406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4- 5\13roject Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx Figure 3-4 The relationship between elevation and flood storage volume in the Lewis Park storage area (subwatersheds SWP_34, SWP_35, SWP_46, SWP_46X, SWP_21, SWP_48, SWP_17, SWP_5, and SWP_14) The improvement options evaluated were selected to help mitigate or replace the potential loss of flood storage and included providing additional storage within Lewis Park below the target elevation of 832.8 feet, providing additional storage upstream of the Lewis Park storage area, and increasing discharge from the Lewis Park storage area (moving water downstream more quickly). These improvement options are discussed in further detail below. 3.4.1 Option A: Providing Additional Flood Storage in Lewis Park Storage Area Option A involves providing additional flood storage below the target flood elevation of 832.8 feet (FilmTec low entry elevation) by significantly lowering the ground surface of Lewis Park. While this option is the only evaluated option that effectively reduces the 100 -year flood elevation below the target elevation, the lowered ground surface may result in wet conditions in the park and parking lot due to proximity to groundwater. Improvement Option A includes several components, which are described below and shown in Figure 3 -5. Provide approximately 60 acre -feet of additional storage below 832.8 feet at Lewis Park to compensate both for lost storage above elevation 832.8 feet and resulting changes in system P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Reportdocx 7 836 835 834 - -- FM ; - ��� 833 i _��_ I I I I .2 832 I i II I i j 831 ~36e re -ft I i (Difference In storage 830 between Flood and i tergetelevatlons) I 829 i I 828 I i i j O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Available Storage Below Y Elevation (acre-ft) - Existing Storage --- •ExistingFloodElevat ion - Atlas 14 ---- TargetElevation - NlmTecLowEntry Figure 3-4 The relationship between elevation and flood storage volume in the Lewis Park storage area (subwatersheds SWP_34, SWP_35, SWP_46, SWP_46X, SWP_21, SWP_48, SWP_17, SWP_5, and SWP_14) The improvement options evaluated were selected to help mitigate or replace the potential loss of flood storage and included providing additional storage within Lewis Park below the target elevation of 832.8 feet, providing additional storage upstream of the Lewis Park storage area, and increasing discharge from the Lewis Park storage area (moving water downstream more quickly). These improvement options are discussed in further detail below. 3.4.1 Option A: Providing Additional Flood Storage in Lewis Park Storage Area Option A involves providing additional flood storage below the target flood elevation of 832.8 feet (FilmTec low entry elevation) by significantly lowering the ground surface of Lewis Park. While this option is the only evaluated option that effectively reduces the 100 -year flood elevation below the target elevation, the lowered ground surface may result in wet conditions in the park and parking lot due to proximity to groundwater. Improvement Option A includes several components, which are described below and shown in Figure 3 -5. Provide approximately 60 acre -feet of additional storage below 832.8 feet at Lewis Park to compensate both for lost storage above elevation 832.8 feet and resulting changes in system P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Reportdocx 7 hydraulics. This area is currently made up of three soccer fields, parking lots and general park area. The additional storage would require lowering the elevation of these features (all features would retain existing functionality, after construction). For modeling purposes, the ground elevation within the park (shown in Figure 3 -5) was lowered to 827.4 feet. • Provide additional flow capacity from the parking lot of FilmTec (SWP_46X) to the Lewis Park pond (SWP_35). The main purpose of the increased pipe capacity is to convey the initial peak flow from Cahill Road and other impervious areas of SWP_46X out of FilmTec's parking lot before the water level in SWP 35 rises due to inflows from the subwatersheds to the north and west. The modeling analysis assumed an additional 36 -inch diameter RCP, with upstream and downstream invert elevations of 828.2 feet and 827.0 feet, respectively, and a peak 100 -year flow of 21 cfs, Lower the outlet of the pond immediately south of Dewey Hill Road (SWP_5) from 828 feet to 827 feet, effectively lowering the normal water level of this pond and the ponds in Lewis Park by 1 foot. • Replace the outlet pipe from SWP_2 to SWP_1 with an equal diameter (24 -inch) RCP, with the control elevation at or below 827.0 feet. The existing CMP outlet pipe is in disrepair and in need of maintenance or replacement. Improvement Option A results in a 100 -year water surface elevation of 832.6 feet in the FilmTec parking lot (SWP_46X), which is 0.2 feet lower than the FilmTec low entry elevation, thus providing a 100 -year level of protection. Additionally, this improvement option does not have adverse impacts to nearby or downstream flood elevations. However, lowering the ground elevation of the park will require significant excavation, which is likely cost prohibitive. Lowering the soccer fields and other park amenities (tennis courts and parking lot) may also result in frequent wet conditions and difficult constructability and /or longevity due to close proximity to groundwater. 3.4.2 Option B: Providing Additional Upstream Storage Due to the fully- developed nature of the area upstream of Lewis Park, the availability of land for upstream storage was limited. Increasing the flood storage in the currently wooded area in SWP_47 was evaluated. The resulting decrease in 100 -year flood elevation in the Lewis Park storage area was minimal and did not alleviate the flooding at FilmTec. Therefore, this improvement option was not pursued further. 3.4.3 Option C: Increasing Flow from Lewis Park Storage Area One way to decrease the required flood storage is to increase the discharge to downstream subwatersheds. Increased flow capacity from the Lewis Park storage area was evaluated (assuming the flow capacity from SWP_5 was increased from about 20 cfs to over 200 cfs), which resulted in decreased 100 -year flood elevations in the Lewis Park storage area. However, the decrease was not sufficient to alleviate the flooding at FilmTec and resulted in increased flood elevations in downstream waterbodies. Given these reasons, this improvement option was not pursued further. P: \Mpls \23 MN\27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS - 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 3.4.4 Option D: Localized Flood Proofing Given the high costs of Option A and the potential detriments to the soccer fields and other park amenities resulting from lowering the park, we recommend that the City and /or FilmTec consider retrofitting the flood -prone structure and parking lot as an alternative option to reduce the frequency of flooding. Retrofitting efforts could include relocating the entryway and lobby at FilmTec to minimize the flooding potential. Retrofitting efforts could also include grading modifications in the parking lot to help keep flood waters from reaching the loading dock and lobby areas during the more frequent, less severe events. The loading dock area at FilmTec has several floor drains that are currently served by the City's sanitary sewer service. When flood waters reach the loading dock area, water enters the sanitary sewer through these drains, adding to the City's I/I problem. Modifications to the FilmTec sanitary drains in the loading dock area should be considered to minimize or prevent flow to the sanitary system during times of stormwater inundation. Modifications may include installation of a manual or automated valve system (float valve /float control) or installation of a low- flow /high -flow diversion structure with pipes connecting the drains to the stormwater system, or some combination thereof. The feasibility of this type of retrofit to reduce I/I at FilmTec is dependent on several factors, includirig local plumbing code restrictions and the connectedness of the loading dock drains to the main sanitary line serving FilmTec. Retrofitting options and costs will vary considerably depending on the specific design modifications. 3.4.5 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost A planning level engineer's opinion of probable cost was prepared for Option A- Providing Additional Flood Storage in the Lewis Park storage area. The opinion of probable cost, summarized in Table 3 -1 was based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine cost for the proposed project. Given that the cost is based on planning -level design, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction cost. A significant portion of the estimated cost is related to excavation and disposal, which can vary significantly depending on site soil conditions. The assumed unit cost of $15 per cubic yard for excavation and disposal was used as a conservative estimate assuming clean soil. See Appendix A for a detailed summary of the cost associated with Option A. Table 3 -1 Estimated cost for Cahill and Dewey (Project Area 4) improvement Option A Improvement Option Estimated Cost' Option A- Providing Additional Flood Storage in Lewis Park Storage Area $3,980,000 1Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. 3.4.6 Water Quality Considerations Although flood risk reduction is the primary objective of this analysis, the water quality benefits or detriments from the evaluated improvement option were also considered. Currently, runoff from Project P. \Mpls \23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles \2013 \STS 4061Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Reportdou Area 4 receives treatment through sedimentation, as the stormwater flows through the series of ponds and wetlands downstream of the park. P8 modeling conducted as part of the CWRMP indicates that the Lewis Park Pond (SWP_35) achieves 52% and 88% removal of total phosphorus (TP) and total suspended sediment (TSS), respectively, during an average water year (based on 1994 -1995 water year). One component of Option A is to lower the normal water levels of the ponds in SWP_5 and SWP_35 by 1 foot. Lowering the normal water levels will reduce the amount of dead storage (storage below the normal water level) available in these ponds, which can reduce sedimentation. The P8 model was revised to reflect the proposed change in normal water levels. Results indicate that the decreased effectiveness of these ponds due to the proposed change in normal water level was minimal (predicted removal efficiencies were reduced to 51% and 87% for TP and TSS, respectively). P. \Mpls \23 MN\27\2327354 \workFiles \2013 \STS 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 10 4.0 Project Are' a 5 -Sally Lane and- Paiute Pass Project Area 5 encompasses the area that drains`to the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass which includes Nine Mile South Branch Catchments NMSB_70, _83, and _84 (Figure 1 71). The stormwater model for this area indicates potential flooding,at this intersection as well as in a backyard depression area 4. located at 'w. 005 and 7009 Sally Lane. The City provided a detailed topographic survey of this intersection and backyard depression area, allowing' available storage to be quantified more.accurately, low entry elevations to be determined for the structures adjacent to the low areas, and overflow elevations between the street'and nearby low areas to,be identified. 4.1 Problem Description Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of Project.Area,5 suggests that flooding will occur in the low area surrounding the intersection of.Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (NMSB -83 and _84) and the backyard depression area behind 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane (NMSB_70) during a 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event. The low area at the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass is currently drained by two storm sewer pipes that flow westward, discharging to the drainageway behind the homes on the west side of Sally Lane (Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek). The backyard depression area is currently drained by a storm sewer pipe that ties into the existing system at Sally.Lane and Paiute Pass. The flooding in these areas appears to be primarily a result-of localized storm sewer capacity limitations. 4.1.1 Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Intersection (NMSB_83, NMSB_84) The storm sewer system at the Sally. Lane and Paiute Pass intersection collects stormwater from a total drainage area of approximately 27 acres. The existing system discharges into the Braemar Branch via two 24 -inch pipes. During the 100 - .year, 24 -hour rainfall event, the Paiute Pass /Sally Lane intersection is inundated with stormwater and ponding occurs. Based on the topographic survey information, ponding will occur in this intersection and onto nearby properties. Two overland flow paths have been identified where water'will flow westward to the Braemar Branch. The north ,overland flow path conveys water between properties 6836 and 7000 Sally Lane. The south overland flow path conveys water between 7000 and 7004 Sally Lane. The upstream invert for the north overland flow path is 862.0 feet and the upstream invert for the south.overland flow path is 861.3 feet. The surveyed low entry elevations in this area are 861.6 feet, 861.5 feet, and 862.0 feet at 7000, 7004, and 6845 Sally Lane, respectively. 4.1.2 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard Depression Area (NMSB_70) A backyard depression area exists behind the homes, along Sally, Lane and Paiute Pass. A 12 -inch piped outlet exists from this area, draining northward and connecting to the system along Paiute Pass. During large rainfall events such as.the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event, the piped outlet does not provide sufficient capacity, and ponding will occur. Two overland flow paths exist which convey flow westward to Sally Lane. The north overland flow path conveys water between properties 7.009 and 7013 Sally Lane. The south overland flow path conveys water between 7013 and 7017 Sally Lane. The upstream invert for the north overland flow path is 863.0 feet and the upstream invert for the south overland flow path is 862.9 P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406\Final ReportsTroject Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final ReporLdocx 11 feet. Based on the topographic survey information, the low entry elevations in this area are 862.9 feet and 863.1 feet at 7009 and 7005 Sally Lane, respectively. 4.2 Model Updates The XP -SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model for Project Area 5 was updated to reflect new rainfall depths as defined by NOAA Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, additional surface overflows were added to the model within the Project Area 5 study area, as needed. The City provided topographic survey at the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass, as well as the Sally Lane backyard depression area. This information was used in conjunction with the MNDNR's 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset to update the stage- storage relationships in the model for subwatersheds within the Project Area 5 study area. The storm sewer information in the model was also updated based on a survey conducted by the City. 4.3 Existing Conditions Flooding Table 4 -1 summarizes the predicted 100 -year, 24 -hour water surface elevations under existing conditions for the subwatersheds within the Project Area 5 study. The 100 -year flood elevation for the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass is 862.0 (subwatersheds NMSB_83 and NMSB_84), which exceeds the low entry elevation of three structures (6845, 7000, and 7004 Sally Lane). The 100 -year flood elevation for the backyard depression area (subwatershed NMSB_70) is 863.2 feet, which exceeds the surveyed low entry elevation of two structures (7005 and 7009 sally Lane). The inundation areas corresponding to these two flood elevations are shown in Figure 4 -1. Table 4 -1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation 4.4 Improvement Options Three flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low area at Sally Lane and Paiute Pass and the backyard depression area. These three options are being considered separately for the purpose of identifying component costs, but the final alternative will be a combination of either Option A with Option B or Option A with Option C. The three options include: P. \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \workFiles\2013\STS- 406\Final Reports\Projed Areas 4- Wroject Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.doa 12 Water Surface Elevation', 100 -year, 24 -hour Rainfall Lowest Low Entry Flooding Area Recurrence Interval Elevation Intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass 862.0(3) 861.52 (NMSB 83 and _84) 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard Depression 863.2(2) 862.9 3 Area (NMSB_70) ' Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths 7 7004 Sally Lane 3 7009 Sally Lane 4.4 Improvement Options Three flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low area at Sally Lane and Paiute Pass and the backyard depression area. These three options are being considered separately for the purpose of identifying component costs, but the final alternative will be a combination of either Option A with Option B or Option A with Option C. The three options include: P. \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \workFiles\2013\STS- 406\Final Reports\Projed Areas 4- Wroject Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.doa 12 Option A: Installation of a 24 -inch diameter corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe to drain the backyard area behind homes on the south side of Paiute Pass and the east side of Sally Lane. The proposed 930 lineal feet of pipe would discharge to the Braemar Branch just downstream of the Valley View Road crossing. Option B: Increasing the capacity of the existing north outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch by replacing the existing 24 -inch diameter CMP with a 36 -inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. In addition, increasing the capacity of the existing south outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch by replacing the existing 24 -inch diameter CMP with a 48 -inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. Option C: Constructing two gravity overflow channels to convey overland flow from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch. One proposed overflow channel is to be located between 6836 Sally Lane and 7000 Sally Lane. The second overflow channel is to be located between 7000 Sally Lane and 7004 Sally Lane. The overflow channels will be controlled positive overflow paths which will ensure the homes are protected from flood waters and not altered in the future by private property owners. 4.4.1 Option A: Install Additional Pipe from Backyard Depression Area As described in Figure 4 -2 and Figure 4 -3, Option A encompasses installation of 930 lineal feet of 24 -inch diameter corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe from the backyard area south and east of Paiute Pass and Sally Lane. The existing pipe which directs runoff to the north will continue to service the backyard area. The proposed pipe exits the existing catch basin in the backyard area and runs south before it turns 90 degrees to the west and passes between 7009 Sally Lane and 7013 Sally Lane. The pipe then runs to the south under Sally Lane, crosses Valley View Road, and discharges into the Braemar Branch downstream of the culvert crossing with Valley View Road. An easement and careful coordination with the affected property owners will be required for the properties crossed by this new pipe. Throughout this analysis, careful consideration was given to preventing adverse downstream impacts as a result of proposed flood improvements. The proposed pipe from the backyard area discharges to the Braemar Branch downstream of Valley View Road, which is a modification to current drainage patterns. To ensure that installation of the new pipe would not cause flood concerns downstream of Valley View Road, the proposed pipe was added to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's XP -SWMM model and run for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event. Model results indicate a negligible change in maximum surface water elevation downstream of Valley View Road. The City may wish to consider further optimization of Option A (upsizing the proposed pipe and extending it northward along Sally Lane- described in more detail in Section 4.4.4) to collect runoff from the low intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass. While not evaluated in detail as part of this analysis, this option may have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for additional pipe capacity as outlined in Option B. Further analysis as part of final design would be required to evaluate detailed design. considerations and assess cost implications and potential downstream impacts of more significant drainage pattern modifications. , P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\ 2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \575_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 13 4.4.2 Option B: Increase Capacity of Sally Lane Storm Sewer As described in Figure 4 -2, Option B includes increasing the capacity of the north outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch by replacing the 24 -inch pipe with a 36 -inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. The capacity of the south outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch will also be increased by replacing the 24 -inch pipe with a 48 -inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. The pipes will follow their existing alignment between 6836 and 7000 Sally Lane. The available installation space will be tight in this area and will require careful coordination with the contractor and the homeowners. The current easement may need to be widened due to the increased size of these pipes. Careful coordination and communication with the property owners affected by this option will be necessary. 4.4.3 Option C: Construct Surface Overflow Channels from Sally Lane As described in Figure 4 -3, Option C includes construction of two gravity surface overflow channels from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch. The northern channel having an upstream invert of 860.1 feet will pass between 6836 Sally Lane and 7000 Sally Lane. The southern channel will pass between 7000 Sally Lane and 7004 Sally Lane and will have an upstream invert of 860.3 feet. Both of the channels are being proposed with vertical retaining walls and riprap bottoms due to the high design flows and velocities associated with the 100 year, 24 -hour rainfall event and the narrow space available between the homes. The easement located between 6836 Sally Lane and 7000 Sally Lane may need to be widened for the north overflow channel. The south overflow will require the creation of an easement between 7000 and 7004 Sally Lane. Careful coordination and communication with the property owners affected by this option will be necessary. 4.4.4 Flood Benefits Table 4 -2 summarizes the water surface elevations in the two low areas near the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass for the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event. The number of dwellings impacted for each scenario is also included in Table 4 -2. Option A lowers the 100 -year maximum water surface elevation below the low entry elevations at 7005 and 7009 Sally Lane. Inundation will still occur in the backyard area during the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event; however, it should not directly impact any structures. Options B and C provide similar benefits, with respect to both the reduction in the maximum water surface elevation and the number of dwellings protected. Implementing either Option B or C would result in lowering the maximum water surface elevation below the low entry elevations of the three impacted dwellings (6845, 7000, and 7004 Sally Lane). There will still be isolated flooding on the street during the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event; however, it should not directly impact any structures. None of the three improvement options evaluated have an impact on the 100 -year flood elevation in the Braemar Branch. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27 \2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS_406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.dou 14 As described in Section 4.4.1, a potential alternative to combining Options A and B would be to upsize and extend the Option A pipe northward along Sally Lane to collect additional flow from the low area at Sally Lane and Paiute Pass and reduce or eliminate the need for additional pipe capacity as outlined in Option B. This option would require installation of a larger and longer pipe that would convey flow from the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass south to the downstream side of Valley View Road. An increased depth of excavation along Sally Lane would be required to allow for tie -in of the low area of the Sally Lane and Paiute Pass intersection. Depth of cover near the low area, a less than desirable pipe slope along Sally Lane (less than 0.5 %), and potential adverse downstream impacts due to redirection of significantly higher flows may also pose design concerns and /or challenges. Table 4 -2 100 -year, 24 -hour maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation Table 4 -3 summarizes the 100 -year, 24 -hour peak discharge rates through the proposed storm sewer pipes and overflows for Options A, B, and C. Table 4 -3 100 -year, 24 -hour peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Sally Lane improvement Options A, B, and C Option A Option A' Option B' Option C' Existing (2 -ft Dia. Pipe to (Increased (Constructed Flooding Area Conditions' Braemar Branch) Outflow Pipes) Overflows) Intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute 862.0(3) NA 861.3(0) 861.4(0) Pass (NMSB_83 and _84) Pipe) Overflow) Overflow) 100 year 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard 863.2(2) 862.2(0) NA NA Depression Area (NMSB_70) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Table 4 -3 summarizes the 100 -year, 24 -hour peak discharge rates through the proposed storm sewer pipes and overflows for Options A, B, and C. Table 4 -3 100 -year, 24 -hour peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Sally Lane improvement Options A, B, and C 4.4.5 Engineer's Opinions of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, and C. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 4 -4, are based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. The cost associated with the purchase of easements or the widening of existing easements has not been included in this estimate. See Appendix B for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, and C. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS - 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 15 Option A 24 -hour Storm (2 -ft Pipe to Option B Option B Option C Option C Recurrence Braemar (North Outflow (South Outflow (North (South Interval Branch) Pipe) Pipe) Overflow) Overflow) 100 year 20 cfs 51 cfs 103 cfs 76 cfs 84 cfs 4.4.5 Engineer's Opinions of Probable Costs Planning level engineer's opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, and C. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 4 -4, are based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning -level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. The cost associated with the purchase of easements or the widening of existing easements has not been included in this estimate. See Appendix B for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, and C. P: \Mpls \23 MN \27\2327354 \WorkFiles \2013 \STS - 406 \Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 15 Table 4 -4 Estimated costs for Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (Project Area 5) improvement Options A, B, and C Improvement Option Estimated Cost' Option A: 24" RCP draining Sally Lane backyard depression area to existing storm $210,000 sewer Option B. increasing the pipe sizes for the north and south outfalls from Sally Lane to $15Q000 the Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek Option C. construction of two overflow channels from Sally Lane to the Braemar $160,000 Branch of Nine Mile Creek Combined Option A +B $360000 Combined Option A + C $370,000 1 Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. 4.4.6 Water Quality Benefits Although flood risk reduction was the primary objective of this analysis, opportunities to implement water quality improvements within the study area were also considered. Due to the limited availability of undeveloped or publicly -owned land within the direct study area, construction of water quality BMPs is difficult. However, we recommend that the City consider installation of rainwater gardens in the City right - of -way or installation of sump manholes with SAFL Baffles (or other underground hydrodynamic treatment structures) to provide opportunity for settling of sediment prior to discharge of stormwater to the Braemar Branch. Although somewhat beyond the study area, a wooded area at the north end of the Braemar Branch was identified as a potential site for stormwater management. The low area (approximately 2.4 acres), which is located west of 6800 through 6812 Sally Lane and south of Sioux Trail in subwatershed NMSB_77, receives stormwater from portions of Edina and Eden Prairie. Review of the National Wetland Inventory indicates that the low area may not be classified as a wetland. The City may want to consider this site for future stormwater management efforts given the high proportion of previously untreated flows to this location. P: \Mpls \23 MM27\ 2327354 \workFles \2013 \STS- 406\Final Reports \Project Areas 4 -5 \Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Reportdocx 16 Project Areas ® City of Edina Boundary Cl Feet 2,500 5,000 BARR Figure 1 -1 PROJECT STUDY AREAS ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin P—► Existing Storm Sewer - 100 -Year 24 -Hour Event BARB J Inundation Area' Subwatersheds O Figure 3 -3 Parcels EXISTING CONDITIONS Feet 100 -YEAR INUNDATION 0 400 800 Project Area 4 - Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin Surface Overflow ► —► Existing Storm Sewer Option A: BARR C3 100 -Year 24 -Hour Event O Figure 3 -5 Inundation Area' Tr Option A: Soil Removal PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Feet OPTION A Subwatersheds 0 400 800 Project Area 4 - Parcels Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ® Existing Manhole /Catch Basin �■ Surface Overflow - Existing Storm Sewer BARR 100 -Year 24 -Hour Event L� ©" Inundation Area* Figure 4-1 Subwatersheds Parcels Feet EXISTING CONDITIONS 100 -YEAR INUNDATION 0 100 200 Project Area 5 - Sally Lane and Paiute Pass *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet 10 —0- Existing Storm Sewer Option A and B: 100 -Year 24 -Hour Event - Inundation Area* BARR om-i■ Option A: Proposed Storm Sewer (2' pipe) O Figure 4 -2 Option B: North Pipe (3' Pipe) Option B: South Pipe (4' Pipe) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Feet OPTIONS AAND B 0 Subwatersheds 0 100 200 Project Area 5 - L _i Parcels Sally Lane and Paiute Pass *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet ED Existing Manhole /Catch Basin �► Existing Storm Sewer Option A and C: 100 -Year 24 -Hour Event Inundation Area' —1111m Option A: Proposed Storm Sewer (2' pipe) Option C: Overflow Channels Subwatersheds Parcels "Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet \- J Feet 0 100 200 MENNOM BARR Figure 4 -3 PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENT OPTIONS AAND C Project Area 5 - Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Appendices Appendix A Cost Estimate Project Area 4— Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 4, OPTION "A" Cahill and Dewey May 15, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 33,000.00 $ 33,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 REMOVALS AND EARTHWORK 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 9365 $ 7.50 $ SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 300 $ 3.50 $ 1,050.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 7515 $ 2.00 $ 15,030.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 1680 $ 5.00 $ 8,400.00 REMOVE TENNIS COURTS SQ YD 1850 $ 2.00 $ 3,700.00 REMOVE TENNIS COURT FENCE LS 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 EARTHWORK CUT AND DISPOSAL CY 113000 $ 15.00 $1,695,000.00 FINAL GRADING ACRE 14 $ 7,000.00 $ 98,000.00 STORM SEWER 36" CPEP STORM SEWER, 4 to 12' DEPTH LN FT 200 $ 52.00 $ 10,400.00 60" DIA RC CATCH BASIN EACH 1 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 36" END SECTION EACH 1 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 MODIFY OUTLET GRATE EACH 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 2090 $ 34.00 $ 71,060.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 11300 $ 20.00 $ 226,000.00 REPLACE 8618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 1680 $ 13.50 $ 22,680.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 9365 $ 7.50 $ 70,237.50 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 9365 $ 8.50 $ 79,602.50 TENNIS COURT PAVEMENT SQ YD 1850 $ 15.00 $ 27,750.00 TENNIS COURT FENCE LN FT 520 $ 90.00 $ 46,800.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 14 $ 5,000.00 $ 70,000.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 SUB TOTAL $2,508,110.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 752,433.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 489,081.45 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 228,238.01 AREA 4, OPTION A TOTAL COST $3,977,862.46 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 5 OPTION "A" Sally Lane and Paiute Pass, Outflow Pipe May 15, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.13 $ 12,500.00 $ 1,625.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE LN FT 500 $ 3.50 $ 1,750.00 INLET PROTECTION EACH 10 $ 350.00 $ 3,500.00 CAT. 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQ YD 600 $ 1.85 $ 1,110.00 REMOVALS SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 600 $ 3.50 $ 2,100.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 935 $ 2.00 $ 1,870.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 410 $ 5.00 $ 2,050.00 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER 24" CPEP - 4 TO 12' DEPTH LN FT 930 $ 30.00 $ 27,900.00 24" FES EACH 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 48" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 30 $ 300.00 $ 9,000.00 60" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 30 $ 650.00 $ 19,500.00 STREET PAVEMENT /RESTORATION 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 210 $ 34.00 $ 7,140.00 REPLACE 8618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 410 $ 13.50 $ 5,535.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 935 $ 7.50 $ 7,012.50 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 935 $ 8.50 $ 7,947.50 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 100 $ 20.00 $ 2,000.00 SUBTOTAL $ .128,040.00 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 38,412.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 24,968.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 11,652.00 AREA 5, SALLY LANE, OPTION A TOTAL COST $ 203,072.00 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: AREA 5 OPTION "B" Sally Lane and Paiute Pass - Increased Pipe Size at Overflow May 15, 2014 ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT I AMOUNT I UNIT COST I TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ 13,000.00 $ 13,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.1 $ 12,500.00 $ 1,250.00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL LN FT 390 $ 10.00 $ SILT FENCE LN FT 450 $ 3.50 $ 1,575.00 INLET PROTECTION EACH 7 $ 350.00 $ 2,450.00 CAT. 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQ YD 470 $ 1.85 $ 869.50 REMOVALS LN FT 210 $ 52.00 $ 10,920.00 SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 40 $ 10.00 $ 400.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 40 $ 5.00 $ 200.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 40 $ 5.00 $ 200.00 REMOVE 24" RCP LN FT 390 $ 10.00 $ 3,900.00 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER LN FT 36 $ 650.00 $ 23,400.00 36" CPEP - 4 TO 12' DEPTH LN FT 210 $ 52.00 $ 10,920.00 36" FES EACH 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 48" CPEP - 6 TO 12' DEPTH LN FT 190 $ 73.00 $ 13,870.00 48" FES EACH 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 60" DIA. RC CATCH BASIN, COMPLETE LN FT 36 $ 650.00 $ 23,400.00 CLASS 5 RIPRAP WITH FILTER TON 60 $ 75.00 $ 4,500.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 80 $ 34.00 $ 2,720.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 40 $ 13.50 $ 540.00 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 40 $ 7.50 $ 300.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 40 $ 8.50 $ 340.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 80 $ 20.00 $ 1,600.00 SUBTOTAL $ 90,334.50 OTHER CONTINGENCY 30% $ 27,100.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 17,615.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7% $ 8,220.00 AREA 5, SALLY LANE, OPTION B TOTAL COST $ 143,270.00 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF. PROBABLE COST: AREA 5 OPTION "C" Sally Lane and Paiute Pass - Channel with Walls at Overflow May 15, 2014 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 80 $ 34.00 $ 2,720.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER ITEWDESCRIPTION _,UNIT ,[,,AMOUNT i�UNIT COST _ TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 1 $ Y 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $ 2000.00 $ 2,000.00 SEEDING TURF GRASSES AC 0.1 $ 12,500.00 $ 11250:00 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 TEMPORARY AND.PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SUBTOTAL v SILT FENCE LN FT 450 $ 3..50 $ 1,575.00 INLET PROTECTION EACH 7 $ 350.00 . $ 2;450.00 CAT. 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQ YD 120 $ 1.85 $ 222.00 REMOVALS CONTINGENCY SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LN FT 40 $ 10.00 $ 400.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 40 $ 5.00 , $ 200.00 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER (B -618) LN FT 40 $ 5.00 $ 200.00 REMOVE 24" RCP LN FT 390 $ 10.00 $ 3,900.00 STORM SEWER AND WALLS CONCRETE SLAB CY 23.5 $ 390.00 $ 9,165.00 CONCRETE VERTICAL WALLS CY 17.8 $ 490.00 $ 8,722.00 DECORATIVE CONCRETE SF 720 $ 12.00 $ 8,640.00 RAILING . LF 190 $ ' 150.00 $ 28,500.00 CLASS 5 RIPRAP WITH FILTER TON 100. $ 75.00 $ 7,500.00 STREET PAVEMENT 8" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 CU YD 80 $ 34.00 $ 2,720.00 REPLACE B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER LN FT 40 $ 13.50 $ 540.00 2 "BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SQ YD 40 ' $ 7.50 $ 300.00 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE W/TACK SQ YD 40- $ 8.50 $ 340.00 TOP SOIL BORROW CU YD 20 $ 20.00 $ 400.00 95,524.00 SUBTOTAL $ OTHER. CONTINGENCY 30% $ 28,657.00 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 15% $ 18,627.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION 7 % $ 8,693.00 AREA 5, SALLY LANE, OPTION C. TOTAL COST $ 151,501.00 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: Approve Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan Action Requested: Approve the Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan. w91�,1� �y •'�COItPORP° 1666 Agenda Item #: VIII. D. Action ❑ Discussion Information Information / Background: Please recall that on February 3, 2014 JoNette Kuhnau of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. presented the Draft Edina Active Routes to School (ARTS) Plan to City Council. At that meeting comments and feedback were solicited from Council on the Draft Plan. That feedback, along with input received from Edina's Boards/ Commissions and the public, was incorporated into the ARTS Plan attached here. Again, the purpose of the ARTS Plan is to identify opportunities and priorities to increase walking and biking to schools, and develop an implementation plan for making improvements in these areas. Edina Transportation Commission Chair Katherine Bass will give a presentation of the draft Plan for Council approval. Attachments: Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan VIII. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Presentation.docx Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan May 2014 Prepared By: Kimley *Horn HeWfh i \l Pmgr" 1SHIP H E A L T H R E F O R M Acknowledgements This Active Routes to School Plan could not have been created without the time, energy, knowledge, and input of the following individuals and agencies: Katherine Bass, Edina Transportation Commission Jennifer Janovy, Edina Transportation Commission and Bike Edina Task Force David White, Edina Public Schools Val Burke, Edina Public Schools Jessica Smith, Bloomington Public Health Julie Zamora, Bloomington Public Health Rick Sansted, Concord Elementary School Principal Chris Holden, Cornelia Elementary School Principal Karen Bergman, Countryside Elementary School Principal Kari Dalquist, Creek Valley Elementary School Principal Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary School Principal Gerry Lukaska, Normandale Elementary School Principal Beth Russell, South View Middle School Principal Shawn Dudley, Valley View Middle School Principal Eric Nelson, Edina High School Assistant Principal Wayne Houle, City of Edina Engineering Mark Nolan, City of Edina Engineering k staH�m lSl ITUIP Kimley o Horn H E A L T H R E F O R M Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary ............................................................................................... ............................... E -1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. ..............................1 Background.............................................................................................................. ............................... 2 ProjectProcess ......................................................................................................... ............................... 3 ExistingConditions Assessment ................................................................................ ............................... 3 StudentData ......................................................................................................... ..............................3 Safety.....................:............................................................................................. ............................... 7 Infrastructure....................................................................................................... ............................... 7 Concord Elementary, Normandale Elementary, and South View Middle Schools ..............................8 CorneliaElementary School .............................................................................. .............................12 CountrysideElementary School ........................................................................ .............................13 Creek Valley Elementary School ........................................................................ .............................15 HighlandsElementary School ............................................................................ .............................16 Valley View Middle and Edina High Schools ...................................................... .............................17 Policyand Programming ..................................................................................... ............................... 21 Cityof Edina ................................................................................................... ............................... 21 EdinaPublic Schools ......................................................................,................. ............................... 22 Recommendations................................................................................................. ............................... 23 Short-Term Improvements .................................................................................... .............................24 Mid -Term Improvements ...................................................................................... .............................28 Long -Term Improvements .................................................................................. ............................... 29 Fundingand Implementation ................................................................................. ............................... 31 Appendix.................................................................................................................. ............................A -1 StudentTravel Tally Results .................................................................................. ............................A -2 ParentSurvey Results ........................................................................................... ............................A -3 Resources............................................................................................................ ...........................A -14 References........................................................................................................... ...........................A -19 Sa`ftei SHI T Kimley > > >Horn Program H E A L T H R E F O R M Executive Summary The purpose of an Active Routes to School Plan (ARTS) is to identify opportunities and priorities to increase walking and biking to schools, and develop an implementation plan for making improvements in these areas. A comprehensive process involving Edina School District, City of Edina, parents, and residents was begun in 2012 to develop a plan for the nine public schools in Edina. Through site visits, principal interviews, data gathering, and stakeholder input, a set of recommendations has been developed to address the needs of students walking and biking to school. These improvements involve actions by multiple stakeholders and include both infrastructure and policy changes. Introduction Walking and biking to school in the United States has decreased dramatically, from over 60 percent in the 1960s to an average of less than 10 percent today. This reduction in active transportation, and corresponding increase in vehicular transportation, negatively affects students' health, vehicle congestion, traffic safety, and environmental quality around schools. Many factors contribute to the reduction in walking and bicycling to school. A survey of parents across the United States was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to find out why their children did not walk or bike to school. The most common reasons cited by parents were distance, traffic safety, weather, and crime. To reverse this decades -long trend of decreased walking and biking, the nationwide Safe Routes to School (SRTS) initiative was created to increase walking and biking to school through the implementation of each of the five "E's ": • Education — Teaching children to walk and bike safely • Encouragement — Developing programs that get children excited about walking or biking to school • Enforcement— Having law enforcement support along the designated routes to school • Engineering— Identifying infrastructure barriers to walking and biking • Evaluation — Measuring the effectiveness of the various components of the SRTS project This Active Routes to School Plan plays an important function of connecting the roles of the school district and the city in jointly seeking to increase walking and biking to school. It is intended to complement and support the work and planning already completed, while also capturing all the factors that influence choices about transportation. The plan builds on the infrastructure improvements previously identified, but also addresses the other four areas of ARTS including policy and programming. Edina has already taken a number of significant steps to improve walking and bicycling in the community, including: • Established a bicycle task force. • Completed the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2007). Implementation of the plan is underway. • Created a sidewalk map as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan (2008). Implementation of the plan is underway. • Completed and implemented the Edina Schools Speed Zone Study (2009). Statewide i �5�� KimleyoHorn H E A L T H R E F O R M E -1 Created the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund (2012) through franchise fees on gas and electricity. The fees are estimated to generate more than $1 million per year. Hired a Transportation Planner whose primary role is to administer the PACS Fund (2013). Adopted a Living Streets Policy and formed an on -going advisory committee to guide Living Streets Plan development (2013). The benefits of a comprehensive ARTS plan are to provide an all- inclusive picture of the needs throughout the school district and community, allowing for programming and prioritization. In addition, it provides the opportunity to address district and city policies and programs related to walking and biking, and having a plan puts the agencies in a favorable position when applying for funding. At the school and neighborhood level, increased walking and biking to school has been shown to improve student health and academic performance, reduce traffic congestion around the school, and thereby also improve air quality and reduce traffic noise. Project Process This plan was developed with input from the key ARTS stakeholders in Edina, including school staff, parents, school district staff, city staff, and students. The initial phases included significant data collection and assembly, along with site observations at each school, discussions with stakeholders, and development of recommendations. Existing Conditions Assessment Site Visits Data J [::1 Gathering Parent ARTS Working Principal L J L Survey Group Interviews ARTS Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian /Bicycle Needs /Opportunities Stakeholder Plan Input Recommendations Improvement Priorities s ir ISHIP H E A L T H RE F O R M E -2 KimleyoHorn Recommendations The following sections present the recommendations of the Comprehensive ARTS Plan to increase walking and biking to schools in Edina. Some recommendations could be feasibly implemented within a short time, while others may require longer timelines due to the need for policy changes or funding. Based on its past planning and active efforts to improve its bicycle and pedestrian facilities, Edina is well - positioned to implement infrastructure improvements and effect the cultural and policy changes necessary to see long -term shifts in travel behavior. City of Edina Improvements ■ Provide enforcement in school zones ■ Conduct study of pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in southeast Edina • Establish city policy for crosswalk markings • Modify ordinance language to allow bicycling on sidewalks • Construct pedestrian ramps at W 72nd Street/ Oaklawn Avenue • Evaluate effectiveness of school speed zone signing and establish city policy for use of school speed zones ■ Construct sidewalk on 58th Street east of Wooddale Avenue • Construct sidewalk connection from Ayrshire Boulevard to Highlands Elementary School • Construct sidewalk or trail on Interlachen Boulevard • Construct sidewalk on Cornelia Drive from 70th Street to 66th Street • Construct sidewalk connection on Oaklawn Avenue to Cornelia Elementary School • Obtain easement and construct 'sidewalk connection from Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue • Construct sidewalk on Claremore Drive, Kellogg Avenue, and Wooddale Avenue • Construct sidewalk on Valley View Road, Tracy Avenue, and Gleason Road • Construct sidewalk on Sun Road, Arbour Avenue, and Olinger Boulevard • Construct sidewalk on Benton Avenue Edina Public Schools Improvements ■ Improve bicycle parking at Edina High School, Valley View Middle School, and Highlands Elementary School ■ Continue or initiate site -level walking and biking activities • Develop a walking and biking section of the school district website • Incorporate language regarding walking and biking to school into the district wellness policy • Incorporate walking and biking safety education into the physical education curriculum • Create a program to improve bicycle parking at all schools • Designate a district Active Routes to School coordinator • Improve surface and maintenance of trail from Creek Valley Road to Edina High School • Reconstruct and narrow the driveways at Cornelia Elementary School Joint City- District Improvements ■ Address safety and traffic issues on Valley View Road at Edina High School/ Valley View Middle School Create a pedestrian and bicycle safety public education campaign Monitor ARTS performance measures on at least an annual basis Establish a permanent Active Routes to School working group Heafth L 1nipm _.t I X11 SIP H E A L T H R E F O R M E -3 Kimley >> )Horn Introduction Walking and biking to school'in the United States has decreased dramatically, from over 60 percent in the 1960s to an average. of less than 10 percent today. This reduction in active transportation, and corresponding increase in vehicular transportation, negatively affects students' health, vehicle congestion, traffic safety, and environmental quality around schools. In Hennepin County, only 24 percent of children age 6 to 17 years get the minimum amount of physical activity recommended by the Centers for Disease Control . 1,2 1 Many factors contribute to the reduction in walking and bicycling to school. A survey of parents across the United States indicated that the most common reasons cited by parents were distance, traffic safety, weather, and crime.3 There are also other factors that affect the population of students that are able to walk or bike, such as physical disabilities, access to a bicycle, and before- and after - school activities. The objective of this plan is to increase the number of students walking and biking who are able to do so, and to improve the safety of their trips. To reverse the decades -long trend of decreased walking and biking, the nationwide Safe Routes to School (SRTS) initiative was created to increase walking and biking to school through the implementation of each of the five "E's ": • Education — Teaching children to walk and bike safely • Encouragement— Developing programs that get children excited about walking or biking to school • Enforcement— Having law enforcement support along the designated routes to school • Engineering— Identifying infrastructure barriers to walking and biking • Evaluation — Measuring the effectiveness of the various components of the SRTS project Locally, walking and biking projects have been initiated and funded through federal transportation funds, as well as the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP). SHIP is dedicated to promoting active living in communities throughout Minnesota, with the goal of reducing obesity and preventing disease. The purpose of this Comprehensive Active Routes to School Plan (ARTS) is to document the existing walking and biking environment in Edina, identify opportunities and priorities to increase walking and biking to schools, and develop an implementation plan for making the improvements. The comprehensive nature of the plan provides an overall view of the needs and priorities in the community. Nationwide, the efforts to increase the number and safety of students walking and biking to school is generally referred to as "Safe Routes to School ". However, this can be a misleading term as no route can truly be made to be "safe." In addition, the plan addresses many aspects of active transportation, of which safety is only one component. Therefore, Edina has chosen to identify the scope of activities related to walking and biking to schools as "Active Routes to School ". This name more accurately describes the focus of the plan and its desired outcomes. Statewide KimlepMorn ISHI 1 H E A L T H R E F O R M Background The City of Edina has taken a number of significant steps to improve walking and bicycling in the city, including: • Established a bicycle task force. • Completed the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2007). Implementation of the plan is underway. • Created a sidewalk map as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan (2008). Implementation of the plan is underway. • Completed and implemented the Edina Schools Speed Zone Study (2009). • Created the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund (2012) through franchise fees on gas and electricity. The fees are estimated to generate more than $1 million per year. • Hired a Transportation Planner whose primary role is to administer the PACS Fund (2013). • Adopted a Living Streets Policy and formed an on -going advisory committee to guide Living Streets Plan development (2013). This Active Routes to School Plan plays an important function of connecting the roles of the school district and the city in jointly seeking to increase walking and biking to school. It is intended to complement and support the work and planning already completed, while also capturing all the factors that influence choices about transportation by building on the infrastructure improvements previously identified, but also addressing the other four areas of ARTS including policy and programming. The benefits of a comprehensive Edina adopted a Living Streets Policy in 2013 to balance the needs of ARTS plan are to provide an motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders. Source: City of Edina, 2013 all- inclusive picture of the needs throughout a school district or city, allowing for programming and prioritization. In addition, it provides the opportunity to address district and city policies and programs related to walking and biking, and having a plan puts the agencies in a favorable position when applying for funding. At the school and neighborhood level, increased walking and biking to school has been shown to improve student health and academic performance, reduce traffic congestion around the school, and thereby also improve air quality and reduce traffic noise. sP�,�sI Kimley >> >Horn ImpmremeM 2 H E A L T H RE F O R M Project Process This plan was developed with input from the key ARTS stakeholders in Edina, including school staff, parents, school district staff, city staff, and students. The initial phases included significant data collection and assembly, along with site observations at each school, followed by evaluations, and development of recommendations. Stakeholder input was gathered at several key points in the process, as highlighted in the diagram below. Existing Conditions Assessment Site Visits Data JJ Gathering Parent Survey ARTS Working Principal Group Interviews ARTS Comprehensive Plan Pedestrian /Bicycle Needs /Opportunities Stakeholder Plan Input Recommendations Improvement Priorities Existing Conditions Assessment The City of Edina encompasses approximately 16 square miles and has a population of nearly 48,000 residents as of the 2010 census. Edina is a first -ring suburb of Minneapolis, and as such, is a fully developed city. However, some of the aspects that have made Edina an attractive city in which to live and work — access to regional transportation facilities (TH 62, TH 100 TH 169, 1 -494), natural amenities such as lakes and parks, and irregular street network in some areas — also can make it challenging for non - motorized transportation. The following sections document the evaluation of the existing conditions for walking and bicycling to schools in Edina. Student Data The Edina School District serves nearly 8,300 students in six elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school. Walk boundaries for each school, which are established by the school district, set the distance within which students are not provided bus transportation. These boundaries for the Edina "�iSHI H E A L T H R E F O R M Kimley > > >Horn School District are generally 0.7 mile for elementary schools, and one mile for middle and high schools. However, within these radii students may be provided bus transportation based on hazardous transportation conditions on the route to school, such as crossings of high volume or high speed roadways. The identification of hazardous transportation conditions is established by the school district, per Minnesota State Statute. On a district -wide basis, approximately 16 percent of students live within the walk boundary of their school. A more detailed summary for each school is shown in Table 1. The students who live within the walk boundary represent the greatest opportunities for increasing walking and biking. Tnhle 1 • F.dinn Students within Walk Zone Boundaries Student travel tallies were conducted for all kindergarten through eighth grade classrooms in the district in fall 2012 using the National Center for Safe Routes to School standard tally forms. The results of the tallies showed that an average of 10.5 percent of elementary students and 12 percent of middle school students walked or biked to school, compared to approximately 18 percent that live within the walk boundary of the school. The predominant mode at all sites was School Bus, followed by Family Vehicle. Nearly 30 percent of all students arrive to or from school by Family Vehicle, which accounts for significant volumes of traffic at each of the school sites. Table 2 shows the average mode results by school. A breakdown of mode for travel to and from school for each site is included in the Appendix. Counts of pedestrians and bicyclists were also conducted as part of the field observations at each site, which are described further in the next section. Statewide ogiram I S I Heafth Improvement H E A L T H R E F O R M 4 Kimley > > >Horn School Enrollment O• • -• :• •. Concord Elementary 730 22% 10% • • -• Bus •• • 68% Cornelia Elementary 550 30% 13% 57% Countryside Elementary 580 24% 29% 53% Creek Valley Elementary 610" 10% 9% 81% Highlands Elementary 560 12% 8% 80% Normandale Elementary 640 9% 7% 84% South View Middle School 1,290 19% 17% 74% Valley View Middle School 1,360 17% 14% 69% Edina High School 1,970 10% 18% 72% Total (Elementary and Middle) 6,320 18% 14% 68% Total (All Schools) 8,290 16% 15% 69% Student travel tallies were conducted for all kindergarten through eighth grade classrooms in the district in fall 2012 using the National Center for Safe Routes to School standard tally forms. The results of the tallies showed that an average of 10.5 percent of elementary students and 12 percent of middle school students walked or biked to school, compared to approximately 18 percent that live within the walk boundary of the school. The predominant mode at all sites was School Bus, followed by Family Vehicle. Nearly 30 percent of all students arrive to or from school by Family Vehicle, which accounts for significant volumes of traffic at each of the school sites. Table 2 shows the average mode results by school. A breakdown of mode for travel to and from school for each site is included in the Appendix. Counts of pedestrians and bicyclists were also conducted as part of the field observations at each site, which are described further in the next section. Statewide ogiram I S I Heafth Improvement H E A L T H R E F O R M 4 Kimley > > >Horn Table 2. Edina Student Travel Tallies A parent survey, developed by the National Center for Safe Routes to School, was conducted in June 2013 with 364 responses. The survey questions are directed at concerns and attitudes related to walking and biking, and parents' perceptions of barriers to walking and biking. As shown in Table 3, for both elementary and middle school students the most -cited reasons by parents for not regularly walking or biking to school were traffic or infrastructure related (amount of traffic, speed of traffic, intersection safety, and presence of sidewalks /pathways). However, distance was cited more frequently as a factor at the high school level compared to the elementary or middle school levels. The age at which parents said they would allow their child to walk or bike to school without an adult was 4th to 6th grade. In the comments section of the survey, the following topics were mentioned five or more times: • Need for sidewalks or paths (34 comments) • Safety concerns along or crossing Wooddale Avenue (13 comments) o Wooddale Avenue/ 50th Street intersection (6 comments) • Heavy backpacks, band instruments, or sports bags make walking or biking not feasible (11 comments) • Safety concerns along Valley View Road (8 comments) • Need for increased enforcement (7 comments) • Safety concerns along 58th Street, specifically need for sidewalk (6 comments) • Safety concerns along Tracy Avenue (5 comments) A full summary of the survey results is included in the Appendix. fam �SH� 5 Kimley > > >Horn Improvement H E A L T H R E F O R M Modes School School .• Walk Bike Bus Vehicle Concord Elementary 8% 6% 55% 28% 3% 0% Cornelia Elementary 10% 5% 47% 27% 2% 9% Countryside Elementary 11% 2% 47% 38% 2% 0% Creek Valley Elementary 6% 6% 60% 27% 1% 0% Highlands Elementary 4% 0% 61% 31% 3% 1% Normandale Elementary 6% 1% 58% 32% 2% 1% South View Middle School 9% 1% 57% 30% 1% 2% Valley View Middle School 13% 1% 60% 24% 2% 0% Average 8% 3% 56% 30% 2 %. 1% A parent survey, developed by the National Center for Safe Routes to School, was conducted in June 2013 with 364 responses. The survey questions are directed at concerns and attitudes related to walking and biking, and parents' perceptions of barriers to walking and biking. As shown in Table 3, for both elementary and middle school students the most -cited reasons by parents for not regularly walking or biking to school were traffic or infrastructure related (amount of traffic, speed of traffic, intersection safety, and presence of sidewalks /pathways). However, distance was cited more frequently as a factor at the high school level compared to the elementary or middle school levels. The age at which parents said they would allow their child to walk or bike to school without an adult was 4th to 6th grade. In the comments section of the survey, the following topics were mentioned five or more times: • Need for sidewalks or paths (34 comments) • Safety concerns along or crossing Wooddale Avenue (13 comments) o Wooddale Avenue/ 50th Street intersection (6 comments) • Heavy backpacks, band instruments, or sports bags make walking or biking not feasible (11 comments) • Safety concerns along Valley View Road (8 comments) • Need for increased enforcement (7 comments) • Safety concerns along 58th Street, specifically need for sidewalk (6 comments) • Safety concerns along Tracy Avenue (5 comments) A full summary of the survey results is included in the Appendix. fam �SH� 5 Kimley > > >Horn Improvement H E A L T H R E F O R M Table 3. Issues that Affect Decision to Walk or Bike Percentages do not total 100% because respondents could select more than one issue. Input was also gathered from the Edina High School Student Council about the reasons students choose their mode of travel to and from school. While K -8 students are most often the focus of ARTS efforts, because they are the most vulnerable population, high school students also face challenges to walking and biking to school. Understanding these challenges will help the city and school district address the issues unique to high school students and the high school campus. The Student Council identified the following key concerns that impacted their ability or willingness to walk or bike to school: • Having sidewalks to walk or bike on, particularly on higher volume roadways. • The illegality of riding bicycles on sidewalks in Edina. • The availability of secure bicycle parking at school. Current bicycle parking at Edina High School • The need for walking and biking education, for parents, as well as students. • School schedule, specifically "zero hour" that begins at 7:30 am. Students with zero hour do not have the option of riding the bus to school, and students walking or biking to school at this time would be doing so in the dark during some months of the year. Statewide it H f, Kim ey >> )Horn improvemment ent 6 Progra J_ H E A L T H R E F 0 R N1 Safety The pedestrian and bicycle crashes within the City of Edina in the past 10 years (2003 -2012) were reviewed to identify the crashes involving school -age children.4 This analysis provides a picture of the overall safety of pedestrians and bicyclists in Edina, but also is used as a comparison to identify key locations or areas where crashes involving young pedestrians and cyclists are of greatest concern. Over the 10 -year period, there were 60 bicycle crashes and 27 pedestrian crashes reported in the city, which represents approximately 3 percent of all crashes occurring on the local roadway network (i.e., excluding the freeway system) during that time period. More than 30 percent of the pedestrian and bicycle crashes in Edina involve a pedestrian or bicyclist under the age of 18, with the 14 -15 year old age group being most over - represented (approximately 11 percent of all pedestrian and bicycle crashes in the city). This indicates a potential need for increased safety education at the elementary and middle school levels, to give children the skills to safely walk and bike in the community. Equally important is driver education of the rules of the road and safe driving behavior around pedestrians and bicyclists. Periodic enforcement of those rules is also needed to increase awareness and compliance near schools and throughout the community. Note that in the following sections discussing infrastructure and safety at each school site, there may be references to the number of crashes within a specific school's walk zone and that these numbers may include some of the same crash incidents under multiple school sites if their walk boundaries overlap. Infrastructure Edina has an existing network of sidewalk and bicycle facilities that connect many of the key destinations in the city, as shown in Figure 1. However, because the city does not have a grid street system in some areas of the city, many of the facilities that provide bicycle and pedestrian connections also carry high volumes of traffic. The routes for bicycles and pedestrians can also be very circuitous due to the established street network and the limited opportunities to cross freeways in some areas of the community. The City of Edina provides winter maintenance and snow clearing on all public sidewalks along designated State Aid roadways, within Public School Zones, along parks, and within major business districts. The clearing of all other sidewalks in the city are the responsibility of the adjacent property owner. Sidewalk map from 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan W NOW- 16— Statewift 1Kimley > >> Horn 7 H E A L T H R E F O R M As noted in the Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, and further described in the site evaluations, the provision of bicycle parking at Edina Public Schools is generally deficient in terms of the number of spaces, their location, and the design of the racks that does not easily allow bicycles to be securely parked. in addition to a citywide review of infrastructure and safety, observations were conducted during school arrival and dismissal to evaluate the condition of the infrastructure, gather data on existing walking and biking numbers, and also identify the primary walk /bike routes to each school. Existing conditions for each school site are provided in Figures 2 -7. Concord Elementary, Normandale Elementary, and South View Middle Schools Three schools — Concord Elementary, Normandale Elementary, and South View Middle School share a continuous site bounded by Normandale Road (Trunk Highway 100) to the west, South View Lane to the north, Concord Avenue to the east, and School Road to the south. Although each school operates independently within the district, they share much of the same infrastructure and therefore have some of the same challenges. Therefore, the site evaluations, observations, and recommendations were conducted and considered as a whole. Concord Elementary School has approximately 730 students and Normandale Elementary has approximately 640 students in kindergarten through 5th grade. The school day is from 8:35 AM to 3:05 PM at both schools. South View Middle School has 1,290 students in grades 6 -9, and the school day is from 7:45 AM to 2:40 PM. There are more than 2,600 students traveling to and from this site in approximately a one -hour period in the morning and afternoon. In terms of infrastructure, Normandale Road, South View Lane, and Concord Road around the perimeter of the site have existing sidewalk. In 2013 a new sidewalk segment was constructed on School Road along the south side of Concord Elementary to fill in a gap in the sidewalk network around the school complex. The construction of this sidewalk segment eliminates the issue of pedestrians walking in the roadway from Concord Avenue to the school entrance. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed at several New sidewalk on School Road next to Concord key intersections around the school sites, as Elementary, constructed in 2013 shown in Figure 2. All -way stop control was also recently installed on Concord Avenue at W 58th Street, which is a major crossing for pedestrians and bicyclists due to the sidewalk on W 58th Street as well as its location near the middle school entrance. There are also push button - activated pedestrian flashers, along with the crosswalk, at the Concord Avenue crossing of Valley View Road due to the higher traffic volumes and speeds on that roadway. School speeds zones that lower the posted speed limit to 15 miles per hour (mph) are posted on sue;ISHU Improvement H E A L T H R E F O R M 8 Kimley *H®rn Edina Active Routes to School''``', Comprehensive.Plan� , - i Normandale Road, South View Lane, Concord Avenue, and School Road. These zones were installed in 2009 following a study of all the school sites in Edina. The posted zones are in effect when children are present. In terms of bicycle infrastructure, Normandale Road, South View Lane, and Concord Avenue north of W 58th Street /Benton Avenue are identified in the city's Comprehensive Bicycle Plan as primary bicycle routes and south of W 58th Street /Benton Avenue as secondary bicycle routes. There are not currently on- street or off - street bicycle facilities on these roadways. Bicycle parking is provided near all three school buildings, and is generally located conveniently next to sidewalks and paved areas. However, the racks at Concord and South View are located in unpaved areas that may become difficult to access in wet or snowy conditions and are not easily visible from the school office or classrooms. Best practices for bicycle parking at schools would locate the racks within 150 feet of an entrance, in a paved area, and easily visible from inside the school building. Many of the racks are also older styles that require the bicycle wheel to be locked to the rack, rather than the bicycle frame, which can result in a higher likelihood of vandalism or damage to the bicycle. Existing bicycle parking at South View Middle School In addition to the infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 0.7 miles of the elementary schools and 1.0 mile of the middle school to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius, but away from the main school campus. A total of 10 bicycle crashes and five pedestrian crashes were reported, with four involving a pedestrian or cyclist under 18 years old. This is a higher rate than seen citywide, which may be in part due to the amount of pedestrian and bicycle activity in this area. Observations were conducted at the site in November 2012 and April -May 2013 during the arrival and dismissal periods to evaluate the safety and operations for pedestrians and bicyclist at each school, which are summarized in the following sections. Concord Elementary School The primary walking and biking routes to school were observed to be to and from the north along Concord Avenue and to the east on W 59th Street. Student school patrols are posted at the intersections of Concord Avenue /W 591h Street and Concord Avenue /School Road to assist with crossings, since nearly all students walking or biking to school must cross the bus and family vehicle traffic traveling to and from the school. Approximately 20 -30 students were observed walking and 30 -40 students were observed bicycling to school on good weather days, accounting for nearly 10 percent of the school population. Concord has organized and participated in past National Walk and Bike to School events, Sta`°wl& uT Kimley >> Horn Program I �1 I � _ � 9 , H E A L T H R E F O R M Edina Active Routes to School - "', ' Co MR rehensive PlantA. - r with many families choosing to bike. During one observation, the bicycle racks at Concord were nearly parked to capacity. The school's west parking lot is used for bus loading and unloading, and the east parking lot is designated for family vehicles. The queue of vehicles waiting to pick -up /drop -off students often spills out of the parking lot and onto School Road, which creates challenges particularly for students walking or biking from the south that must cross the line of vehicles to get to the school. During the day, only the main entrance of the school is open, and the lack of sidewalk on School Road or on the school site between the parking lot and main entrance is an issue not only for students walking and biking, but also for visitors to the school. School staff provided input to the reviews and highlighted several of their concerns with walking and biking at Concord: • Distracted driving (e.g., due to cell phone use) in the school parking lot is a significant safety issue during arrival and dismissal • Control of the School Road /Concord Avenue intersection is an issue, even with the school patrols, due to the amount of activity and the current intersection control with stop signs on School Road only • Lack of sidewalk on many streets is a major barrier to walking or biking for manyfamilies. Bicycle parking at Concord Elementary during Bike to School Week in May 2013 Vehicle traffic queued from the parking lot onto School Road Normandale Elementary School Due to its location adjacent to TH 100 and its role as a French immersion school, Normandale has the lowest percentage of its students living within the walk boundary of any school in the district. As a result, fewer than 10 students were observed biking to school and approximately 10 -15 students were observed walking to school. This represents less than five percent of the population of the school. The primary routes were to and from the north along Normandale Road, St. Andrews Avenue, and Concord Avenue. Two students were observed to utilize the pedestrian bridge to cross to the west side of TH Stall aid u Kimle > >> Horn T Improvement r '? 10 y Program A H E A L T H R E F 0 R Pot 100. Normandale does not operate a school patrol and has not participated in National Walk and Bike to School Days in the past. The available bicycle parking at Normandale consists of one rack located near door 8, which is on the east side of the building at the Community Center entrance, and one rack at the north entrance. These locations are not visible or convenient to the main entrances of the school. The school principal and administrative staff indicated that students are not encouraged to walk or bike to Normandale. Most students are bussed, with 14 buses serving the school, but there is also a significant volume of family vehicles each day. Buses primarily use Normandale Road for loading and unloading, but some also use the driveway on South View Lane. Parent traffic is directed to use the parking lot and circular drive on the south side of the school, but due to the volume of traffic the queue during afternoon dismissal often spills out of the parking lot and onto Normandale Road, which can impact the bus traffic as well. South View Middle School A relatively large number of students currently walk and bike to South View Middle School. During the on -site observations, as many as 90 students were observed walking to and from school and as many as 40 students were observed bicycling. This represents approximately 10 percent of the student population, or about half the number of students that live within the walk zone. The primary routes for both walkers and bicyclists n were south on Concord Avenue, east on W 58th Street, and north on Concord Avenue. 1 South View sometimes operates a school patrol at the South View Lane /St. Andrews Avenue intersection, which is staffed by the Traffic on South View Lane during arrival assistant principal and students who have been assigned to crossing duty. The school has tried to recruit parents to serve as regular crossing guards on South View Lane, but had only one parent volunteer. The volume and speed of vehicles on South View Lane, as well as drivers' disregard for the school patrols, are a frequent source of concern and complaints by parents. The bicycle racks at South View are located near the south parking lot, along Concord Avenue, but are in a grassy area. The visibility of the racks behind the building, along with the style of racks that do not allow for locking the frame of the bicycle to the rack, do not provide very secure bicycle parking. School staff reported that at times there is also insufficient capacity in the existing racks. M r, Buses load and unload students primarily in the south parking lot. Parents are directed to use the west parking lot, between South View and Normandale, for pick -up and drop -off, but a significant number instead use South View Lane and St. Andrews Avenue. Statewide,s Kimley > >> Horn Health f H E A L T H R E F 0 R hl Input from school staff raised a number of additional concerns at the school, including enforcement of the school speed zones, the need for additional sidewalk and bicycle infrastructure, and the desire for traffic calming on South View Lane. Cornelia Elementary School Cornelia Elementary School has approximately 550 students in kindergarten through 5th grades. The school day runs from 9:20 am to 3:50 pm. The walking and biking infrastructure around the school includes sidewalk along W 70th Street, Cornelia Drive and portions of W 72nd Street. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed at several key intersections around the school site, as shown in Figure 3. The designated school crossings all have pedestrian ramps, except for the W 72nd Street /Oaklawn Avenue intersection. The signalized intersection of W 701h Street /Cornelia Drive is signed No Turn On Red due to the vehicle /pedestrian conflicts, especially during school arrival and dismissal. School speed zones were posted in 2009 on Cornelia Avenue and W 701h Street as a result of the School Speed Zone Study. The segment of W 701h Street from France Avenue to TH 100 was reconstructed in 2011 to include a three -lane roadway section with on- street bicycle lanes and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. The posted speed limit was also reduced from -30 mph to 25 mph as part of the project. In addition to the school speed zone and school crossing on W 70th Street near Cornelia, there is also a signed pedestrian crossing with flashers at W 70th Street /Wooddale Avenue. Cornelia Drive north of W 701h Street is signed and has on- street markings as a bicycle boulevard and is identified a primary bicycle route in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Reconstructed W 70t�' Street with improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities Bicycle parking at Cornelia is located on the west side of the school, near the playground. Although the bicycle racks are located on a concrete pad, which is beneficial for providing convenient parking during wet conditions, the racks are not visible from the school building and are not easily accessible from the main school entrances. The racks are also older styles that require the bicycle wheel to be locked to the rack, rather than the bicycle frame, which can result in a higher likelihood of vandalism or damage to the bicycle. Pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 0.7 miles of the school to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius. A total of eight bicycle crashes and five pedestrian crashes were reported, with four involving a pedestrian or cyclist between 15 and 18 years old. Approximately half the crashes occurred during the summer months (June- August) and half during the rest of the year. The rate of crashes involving 15 to 18 year -old pedestrians and bicyclists in this area is higher than seen citywide. Statewide Improve I SH 1 ` i H E A L T H R E F O R M 12 Kimley >> )Horn During observations in November 2012, approximately 50 students were observed walking and 5 students were observed bicycling to and from school, representing about 10 percent of the student population. However, this is a relatively small portion of the 30 percent of students that live within the walk zone. The primary routes are to the north and south on Cornelia Drive, however the sidewalk on Cornelia Drive ends just north of W 70th Street. There is also a lack of sidewalk infrastructure to the west of the school. Buses load and unload in the main parking lot on the south side of the school. Family vehicles occupy the driveway on the east side of the school, both sides of Cornelia Drive near the school entrance, and also some parts of the south parking lot. The school driveway entrances are very wide and were observed to be the source of conflicts and right -of -way confusion between pedestrians and vehicles, even when the school patrol was present to assist with the crossings of the driveways. Vehicles leaving the school and turning left onto westbound W 70th Street also created conflicts with the school patrols and the pedestrians crossing W 70th Street. Wide crossing of the school driveway creates potential vehicle /pedestrian conflicts Cornelia has participated in past National Walk to School Day events, which was promoted through physical education classes, and has hosted the district bike rodeo for the past two years. In addition to the issues observed during the on -site evaluations, school staff identified several other walking and biking concerns including the lack of sidewalk on Cornelia Drive north of W 70th Street and the need for a sidewalk or trail connection from the Parklawn neighborhood to the school. Countryside Elementary School Countryside Elementary School has approximately 580 students in kindergarten through 5th grades. The school day runs from 9:20 am to 3:50 pm. The walking and biking infrastructure around the school includes sidewalk along the east side of Tracy Avenue and north side of Benton Avenue. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed at several key intersections around the school, as shown in Figure 4. A 15 -mph school speed zone was posted in 2009 on Tracy Avenue as a result of the School Speed Zone Study. M Irst.emrd Kimley > > >Horn mpro Healm 13 Prowa H E A L T H R E F O R M1t Reconstructed Tracy Avenue with bicycle lanes and high visibility crosswalks The segment of Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue was reconstructed in 2012 to include a two -lane roadway section and on- street bicycle lanes and sidewalk on the east side of the roadway. The posted speed limit was also reduced from 30 mph to 25 mph as part of the project. In addition to the school speed zone and school crossing on Tracy Avenue near Benton Avenue, there are also signed pedestrian crossings of Tracy Avenue at Grove Street, Warden Avenue, Hawkes Drive, and Hawkes Place and a dynamic driver feedback (YOUR SPEED) sign. Tracy Avenue and Benton Avenue east of Tracy Avenue are identified as primary bicycle routes in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Bicycle racks at Countryside are located on the southeast corner of the school and near the front entrance. Both locations are placed on concrete pads adjacent to sidewalk and were specifically situated to eliminate potential conflicts with vehicles entering the site. However, both racks are older styles that require the bicycle wheel to be locked to the rack, rather than the bicycle frame, which can result in a higher likelihood of vandalism or damage to the bicycle. Pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 0.7 miles of the school to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius. A total of four bicycle crashes and zero pedestrian crashes were reported, with one involving a bicyclist between 15 and 18 years old and one crash involving an 11 year old bicyclist (i.e., elementary school age). All of the crashes occurred at intersections along or near Vernon Avenue. During observations in April and May 2013, approximately 50 students were observed walking and 10 students were observed bicycling to and from school, representing about 10 percent of the student population. The primary routes are to the east and west on Benton Avenue, and north and south on Tracy Avenue. All pedestrians and bicyclists traveling on Tracy Avenue or east on Benton Avenue must cross at the Tracy Avenue /Benton Avenue intersection, which has significant traffic volumes, so there is an adult crossing guard with a stop paddle at the intersection to assist with the crossings before and after school. §6&_ Statewide Health Program I SHI I H E A L T H R E F O R M 14 W Kimley O Horn Buses load and unload in the main parking lot on the north side of the school. Family vehicles occupy the parking lot on the east side of the school and the west side of Tracy Avenue. Much of the vehicle traffic to and from the school site also travels through the Tracy Avenue /Benton Avenue intersection. Countryside has participated in past National Walk to School Day events, which was promoted through the school newsletter and in classrooms. Input from school staff indicated that the school's Site Council and Kids Council are active and open to supporting or promoting future walking or biking events. There may also be opportunities to incorporate walking and biking activities or education into the Kids Club before /after school care. Of the six elementary schools in Edina, Countryside was observed to have the one of the strongest cultures and support structure for walking and biking to school. Creek Valley Elementary School Creek Valley Elementary School has approximately 610 students in kindergarten through 5th grades. The school day runs from 9:20 am to 3:50 pm. The walking and biking infrastructure around the school includes sidewalk along the east side of Gleason Road and north side of Creek Valley Road. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed at the Gleason Road /Creek Valley Road intersection, as shown in Figure 5. A 20 -mph school speed zone is posted on Gleason Road and a 15- mph school speed zone is posted on Creek Valley Road as a result of the School Speed Zone Study. Gleason Road is also identified as a primary bicycle route in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. The segment of Creek Valley Road east of Gleason Road was reconstructed in 2012, - and sidewalk was added on the north side New sidewalk and enhanced crosswalks on Creek Valley Road of the roadway. A segment of sidewalk was also recently added on the school site, on the south side of the family pick -up drive, to eliminate conflicts between pick -up /drop -off traffic and pedestrians walking from Gleason Road to the school building. This sidewalk segment was funded by the school's Parent Teacher Association. Bicycle racks at Creek Valley are located on the south side of the school near the playground. The racks are appropriately placed on concrete pads near the back entrance to the school, and are a newer style that allow for locking the bicycle frame rather than the wheel. However, there are not any bicycle racks located near the front entrance of the school. Pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 0.7 miles of the school to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius. A total of one bicycle crash and three pedestrian crashes were reported, with two involving pedestrians between 15 and 18 years old. This is likely due to the proximity of Creek Valley to Edina High School. !'` .P, ,�S�i 15 Kimley) )Horn j Program H E A L T H R E F O R M Edina Active Routes to School`" , f Conl i ehem save Plan A 4 During observations in November 2012 and May 2013, approximately 30 students were observed walking and five students were observed bicycling to and from school, representing about six percent of the student population compared with the 10 percent that live within the walk zone. The primary walking and bicycling routes are to the south on Gleason Road and to the east and west on Creek Valley Road. No students were observed traveling to the north on Gleason Road. Student school patrols were stationed at the Gleason Road /Creek Valley Road intersection. A number of conflicts were observed at the intersection between pedestrians and the pick -up /drop -off queue that extends out of the school site and south on Gleason Road through the intersection. Vehicles also queue on Creek Valley Road east and west of the intersection after school. Buses load and unload in the main driveway on the west side of the school. Family vehicles occupy the circular driveway on the southeast side of the school, but frequently spill onto the adjacent roadways during the school dismissal period. Creek Valley has had the most active walking /biking program of any of the schools in the district. The school's Wellness Committee started and continues to support weekly "Walking Wednesdays" during good weather months and holds an annual fun walk /run event before school in May. The school also has participated in National Walk to School Day. Input from school staff indicated that the high school traffic and the lack of connection to students living in the neighborhoods near Tracy Avenue makes walking and biking less favorable to students. Highlands Elementary School Highlands Elementary School has approximately 560 students in kindergarten through 5th grades. The school day runs from 9:20 am to 3:50 pm. The walking and biking infrastructure around the school includes sidewalk along one side of Doncaster Way and a trail on the south side of Vernon Avenue. Most of the streets near the school do not have sidewalk and the lack of connectivity of the roadway network create barriers to finding safe and relatively direct routes from the neighborhoods to the school building. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed on Doncaster Way at the crossing from the W Off school site to the sidewalk on the west side of the roadway, as shown in Figure 7. A 15 -mph school speed zone was posted in 2009 on Doncaster Way as a result of the School Speed Zone Study. - r� Bicycle racks at Highlands are located in the south corner of the school's parking lot. This is an undesirable location based on the distance and visibility from the building. The racks are older styles that require the bicycle wheel to be locked to the rack, rather than the bicycle frame, which can result in a higher likelihood of vandalism or damage to the bicycle. Bicycle racks are located in the corner of the parking lot and are in poor condition lN Sa ASH Kimley > > >Horn Improvement 16 Program H E A L T H R E F O R M Pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 0.7 miles of the school to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius. A total of five bicycle crashes and one pedestrian crash were reported, with one involving a bicyclist between 15 and 18 years old. During observations in November 2012 and April 2013, approximately 10 students were observed walking and "no students were observed bicycling to and from school, representing only two percent of the student population. The primary routes are to the north and south on Doncaster Way. All of the pedestrians and bicyclists must cross the queue of family vehicles to reach the sidewalk and many also cross the vehicle queue again at Doncaster Way. A student school patrol, with an adult supervisor, operates at the Doncaster Way crossing. However, an adult crossing guard is also i j needed at the crossing of the parking lot /playground entrance where pick -up /drop - off occurs. Some students also walk through `..,.. a the school site to the east, where there is no walkway, path, or public right -of -way, to reach the neighborhoods north of Ayrshire - "_� "3F4 ..y, Boulevard. Buses load and unload in the main parking lot on the west side of the school. Family vehicles occupy the playground /parking lot on the south side of the school, which extends back to Doncaster Way. There is staff supervision with school patrol flags at the pick -up /drop -off area. During dismissal vehicles queue over pedestrian crossing In the past, Highlands had a parent group that met for two years and worked to hold walking and biking activities. However, due to the very small population of students within the walk zone and number of infrastructure barriers, the group disbanded. The school does participate annually in National Walk to School Day. Input from school staff identified the need for a dedicated sidewalk or path on Interlachen Boulevard. A trail was previously proposed as part of an improvement project in 2006, but was not approved. Traffic speeds on Ayrshire Boulevard are also frequently expressed as a safety concern, compounded with the lack of designated pedestrian crossing of Ayrshire Boulevard. Valley View Middle and Edina High Schools Valley View Middle School and Edina High School share a site located along Valley View Road. Valley View Middle School has approximately 1,360 students in grades 6 through 9, and Edina High School has approximately 1,920 students in grades 10 through 12, resulting in more than 3,000 students on the site. Due to the topography and wetlands surrounding the site, the only site accesses are from Valley View Road. Valley View's hours are 7:45 AM to 2:30 PM and the high school's hours are 8:30 AM to 3:10 PM. Although each school operates independently within the district, they share much of the same infrastructure and therefore have some of the same challenges. Therefore, the site evaluations, observations, and recommendations were conducted and considered as a whole. a State Health Kimley >)) Horn I I`l� ie Y I Program Improvement 17 H E A L T H R E F O R M In terms of sidewalk infrastructure, Valley View Road, and Gleason Road north of Valley View Road all have existing sidewalks. However, there is a notable sidewalk gap on Valley View Road west of Gleason Road. This sidewalk segment is identified in the City's comprehensive plan as a future project, but has not yet been programmed for construction. Reviewing the wider area around the schools, both TH 62 and TH 100 act as barriers to connectivity between southeast Edina and key destinations in other parts of the city. There are limited available walking and biking routes from these neighborhoods to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School. The routes that are available also have some noted deficiencies, such as the pedestrian bridge over TH 62 near Rosland Park, which only has a stair access and therefore is not accessible for all users, and the TH 100 crossing on 66th Street, which has narrow sidewalk that ends west of the bridge. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed at several key intersections around the school sites, as shown in Figure 8. The crosswalk parallel to Valley View Road across the schools' eastern driveway is very faded and in need of repainting. There are no marked crosswalks where the sidewalk crosses the other two school driveways. School speeds zones that lower the posted speed limit from to 20 mph are posted on Valley View Road and a short portion of Antrim Road. These zones were installed in 2009 following a study of all the school sites in Edina. The posted zones are in effect when children are present. In terms of bicycle infrastructure, Gleason Road, Valley View Road, and Tracy Avenue are all identified in the city's Comprehensive Bicycle Plan as primary bicycle routes. Antrim Road and Valley View Road /Tracy Avenue south of TH 62 have on- street bicycle lanes. In addition, the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is proposed to be constructed through the area north of the schools and cross TH 62. Existing trail connection from Creek Valley Road to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School There is also an existing trail on school property that connects Creek Valley Road to the school buildings. The existing trail provides a significantly more direct connection from the Creek Valley and Indian Hills neighborhoods to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School than the roadway network. However, the trail is narrow, paved for only a portion of the connection, and is not maintained in the winter. Improving this trail surface and its maintenance would enhance the biking and walking connection to the schools during all months of the year. Program ISHIT' H E A L T H R E F O R M 18 Kimley >> )Horn Bicycle parking is generally inadequate considering there are over 3,000 students at the site. Two bicycle racks are located at the southeast corner of the middle school, one bicycle rack is located near door 12 on the east side of the middle school, one bicycle rack is located near the entrance to the Performing Arts Center, and one rack is located near the main entrance of the high school. Most of the racks are in unpaved areas, are not easily visible from the school office or classrooms, and several of the racks do not allow for the bicycle frame to be locked. Bicycle parking conditions at Valley View Middle School and Edina High School In addition to the infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 1.0 mile of the school site to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius, but away from the main school campus. A total of five bicycle crashes and two pedestrian crashes were reported, with two involving a pedestrian under 18 years old. One crash occurred at the Valley View Road /Chapel Lane intersection at school dismissal and involved a high school aged driver and pedestrian. This location has a number of pedestrian /vehicle conflicts during school dismissal and is an area of safety concern identified by the school, students, parents and residents in the neighborhood. Observations were conducted at the site in April -May 2013 during the arrival and dismissal periods to evaluate the safety and operations for pedestrians and bicyclist at each school, which are summarized in the following sections. Valley View Middle School The primary walking and biking routes to and from school were observed to be to and from the east and west along Valley View Road, with the greatest number of students traveling to and from the east. A few also walked to the north, across the fields, towards Creek Valley Elementary School. Students who walked to the west were observed walking from the school building diagonally across the parking lot towards Valley View Road. This is the most direct walking route, but results in pedestrian /vehicle conflicts and safety concerns in the parking lot and at the parking lot exit onto Valley View Road. A trained traffic monitor (school staff) typically directs traffic and assists with pedestrian and bicycle crossings at the Valley View Road /Antrim Road intersection before and after school. Approximately 120 students were observed walking, but less than 10 students were observed bicycling to school. While this is a large number of pedestrians, this represents slightly less than 10 percent of the student population. Statewide SIR Kimley >> Narn ' Hment I dt % Improvement 19 Program H E A L T H R E F O R M Edina Active Routes to School' Comprehensive Plan The school's east parking lot is used for bus loading and unloading, and the southwest parking lot (near the high school) is designated for family vehicles. Many parents also use the parking lane on the north side of Valley View Road. The queue of vehicles waiting to pick -up students in the parking lot after school often spills out of the parking lot and onto Valley View Road, even when there are parking spaces available in the lot. The large number of school buses exiting the parking lot after school, combined with large volumes of vehicle and pedestrian traffic on Valley View Road result in conflicts, congestion, and the perception of unsafe conditions. There have also been past concerns expressed by parents and students regarding vehicles and buses not stopping at the sidewalk as they exit onto Valley View Road. Edina High School The primary walking and biking routes to and from school were observed to be to and from the east and west along Valley View Road, similar to Valley View Middle School. The largest number of students traveled to and from the east. A few also walked to the north, across the fields, towards Creek Valley Elementary School. Approximately 100 to 110 students were observed walking, but less than 10 students were observed bicycling to school. This is a smaller number of pedestrians /bicyclists than the middle school, even though the high school has over 40 percent more students, which is most likely due to the large number of students who drive to school. Students who walked to the west were observed walking from the school building diagonally across the parking lot towards Valley View Road, crossing through the double queue of vehicles waiting to exit the parking lot onto Valley View Road. There were many pedestrian /vehicle and vehicle /vehicle conflicts observed at the high school exit and at the Chapel Lane intersection. Trained traffic monitors (school staff) typically direct traffic xp and assist with pedestrian and bicycle crossings at the Valley View Road /Tracy Avenue intersection and at the high school driveway exit onto Valley View Road before and after school. During dismissal, the traffic monitors at the driveway exit stop traffic on Vehicles queue over the school crossing, causing pedestrian conflicts and limited sight lines Valley View Road to allow vehicles in the parking lot to exit. This causes vehicles to queue in both directions on Valley View and results in pedestrians crossing Valley View Road at Chapel Lane to cross between the queued westbound vehicles that are queued through the intersection as well as attempting to see a gap in eastbound traffic when those drivers may not be able to see the pedestrian. In addition, there is right -of -way confusion between pedestrians approaching the driveway on the sidewalk and the line of vehicles exiting the parking lot (i.e., pedestrians do not know if the vehicles are going to stop behind the sidewalk). After school, the queue of vehicles waiting to exit the site extended to the north parking lot and took approximately 15 minutes to clear. Statewide Kimley > >> Horn ISH 20 H E A L T H RE F O R M The school's east parking lot is used for bus loading and unloading, and the southwest parking lot (near the high school) is designated for family vehicles. Student parking is in the north parking lot and school administration reported that approximately 400 to 440 student parking permits are issued by the high school, representing more than 20 percent of the student population. The primary safety concerns and issues expressed by school staff were related to the dual lane traffic exiting the parking lot onto Valley View Road and also the conflicts between the driveway traffic and the pedestrian crossing of Valley View Road. Policy and Programming City of Edina As part of the development of this plan, a Safe Routes Working Group was established that includes City of Edina Engineering staff, Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) representatives, Edina School District staff, Bloomington Public Health staff, and an Edina school principal representative. The role of this group is to share information, identify and discuss challenges and opportunities to walking and biking to schools in Edina, and discuss the implementation and prioritization of measures to increase walking and biking to school. The Bike Edina Task Force and the Edina Transportation Commission will continue to play key roles in providing input to the City Council on walking and biking related issues. The City of Edina has a number of plans and polices in place with specific goals to improve walking and biking in the city. The 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plans contains 10 transportation goals that lay out the vision and objectives for transportation in the community, several of which can directly or indirectly be tied to the goals of Active Routes to School: Goal 1. Maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives. Goal 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina's environment and neighborhood quality of life. Goal Z Provide multiple travel options for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists, and rideshare users, as well as for drivers of private automobiles. The Comprehensive Plan also contains policies relevant to the construction of new roadways: Roadway Design Policy 4. Design /enhance residential street systems to discourage through traffic and to be compatible with lower speed bicycling and walking. This includes consideration of traffic calming measures on local streets and, in some cases, collector streets. Policy 5. Design /enhance collector and arterial roadways to minimize through traffic on local streets in the functional classification system, and to be compatible with other transportation modes including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. ro (SHIP Kimley) )Horn rm°`°ve"'e'u 21 H E A L T H R E F O R M Roadway Maintenance and Operation Policy 8. Complete speed zone studies and establish speed zones for Safe Routes to School. The PACS fund was approved by the Edina City Council in December 2012 to provide dedicated funding to make the community more walkable and bikeable. Revenue for the PACS is generated by a franchise fee ordinance and will be used exclusively for improvements to the City's non - motorized transportation network, including sidewalks, trails, and other bicycle infrastructure. The PACS fund may also be used to maintain existing sidewalks, signing, pavement markings, lighting, and pedestrian crossing signals. The Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan also contains a number of recommendations that support and complement the Active Routes to School program such as creating a bicycle coordinator position within the city, adopting a Complete Streets policy for street design, improving bicycle parking facilities at Edina public schools, and providing recurring bicycle safety training, education, and encouragement programs in Edina schools. The City of Edina has made progress on these recommendations in the creation of a Transportation Planner position to focus on bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and adopting a Living Streets policy in 2013. The Comprehensive Plan identifies future sidewalk and bicycle facilities for improvements, which are summarized in Figure 8. The Living Streets Advisory Groups have an important role in prioritizing the improvements identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, and this Active Routes to School Plan. However, one of the challenges to implementation of these policies and projects is public opposition. On several past projects in the city, construction of new sidewalks was opposed by residents and was ultimately removed from the proposed projects. In a 2013 survey6, a majority of residents indicated there are "about the right amount" of sidewalks (58 percent of respondents) and trails /bikeways (83 percent of respondents). Yet the most common issue and concern expressed by school administration and parents is the lack of sidewalk infrastructure to schools. This conflict in public perception is an issue that will continue to be a challenge to implementation of new infrastructure to support walking and biking in Edina. Edina Public Schools The Edina School District established a Wellness Policy in 2008 that addresses nutrition guidelines, nutrition education, physical activity, and parent education. Although it does not specifically address walking or biking to school, several of the policy statements align well with the goals of the ARTS program: ll. General Statements of Policy A. The school board recognizes that nutrition education and physical education are essential components of the educational process and that good health fosters student attendance and education. B. The school environment should promote and protect students' health, wellbeing, and ability to learn by encouraging healthy eating and physical activity. sP� Kimley > >> Horn Improvement 22 H E A L T H R E F O R M D. Children need access to healthy foods and opportunities to be physically active in order to grow, learn, and thrive. E. All students will have opportunities, support, and encouragement to be physically active on a regular basis. In addition, the Guidelines within the Wellness Policy provide support for physical activity outside of the school day: lll. Guidelines E. Communication with Parents 2. The school district will support parents' efforts to provide a healthy diet and daily physical activity for their children. 4. The school district will provide information about physical education and other school -based physical activity opportunities and will support parents' efforts to provide their children with opportunities to be physically active outside of school. The School District also has a Wellness Committee that includes the director of business services, the manager of food services, the director of teaching and learning, the coordinator of health services, and at least three parent representatives. However, there is not a representative of the Transportation Services Department included on the committee. A number of localized ARTS activities have also been occurring at the individual school sites, such as participation in International Walk to School Day in the fall and National Bike to School Day in the spring, and hosting of a bike rodeo. Most of the schools have bicycle parking available and the elementary schools operate a school patrol to provide for safe crossings immediately next to the school but the school patrol consists of students which is not a best practice. However, there are not currently district - wide ARTS activities or walking /biking curriculum, and there are varying degrees of infrastructure, support, and encouragement for walking and biking among the various school sites within the district. Recommendations While it is not feasible for all students to walk or bike to school, the goal of the ARTS plan is to implement policies and infrastructure that make it safer and encourage students to walk or bike if and when they are able. The following sections and Figures 9 -14 present recommendations to increase walking and biking to schools in Edina. The implementation timeline for each recommendation has been identified (short-term, mid -term, long -term, or on- going) as well as identifying the agencies or organizations that would most appropriately take the lead in implementation. The recommendations identified as short-term are generally actions that could be implemented in the next two years, mid- term improvements are generally considered to require two to four years to implement, and long -term recommendations are expected to require more than four years. Recommendations considered to be long -term may also trigger other processes such as policy changes or identification of significant funding sources. In some cases, the recommendations in this plan support or reiterate projects or recommendations already contained within the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Sta`ewMe Kimley *Horn Hewffi ��� �5T TP 23 >> H E A L T H R E F O R M Short -Term Improvements ■ Improve bicycle parking at Edina High School /Valley View Middle School and Highlands Elementary School. These two -�j' z school sites were identified as having the most immediate needs for improvements I TRS AREA in bicycle parking. The school sites UK- R cWaX. currently have bicycle racks that are in poor condition and not well - located for convenience and security. Racks should be installed in paved areas that are visible and proximate to the main entrances of the schools. A fenced and monitored bicycle corral could also be considered at the same time for the high school and middle school, or this could be Example of a bicycle corral at Richfield Middle School implemented as a later phase. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. • Address safety and traffic issues on Valley View Road at Edina High School/ Valley View Middle School. Site observations and stakeholder input identified this area as one of the most significant safety concerns in the city. There are multiple conflicting priorities at both sites including bus traffic, parent vehicle' queuing, student vehicle parking and traffic, pedestrians, and bicyclists. These issues are complex and although there have been past efforts to improve the conditions, they have not resolved the safety concerns. The City and School District should convene a group of stakeholders to discuss and attempt to find solutions to improve safety for all users of the site. Implementation lead: City of Edina and Edina School District. • Provide enforcement in school zones. Zones establishing lower speed limits around schools were installed in 2009 following a comprehensive study of the school sites in Edina. Some of these locations continue to have driver behavior issues such as failure to yield to pedestrians and speed violations. Regular enforcement and issuing of warnings or citations to drivers that exhibit unsafe behavior or travel even a few miles per hour above the posted school speed limit is one way to improve driver behavior and educate drivers. Minnesota state law currently prohibits texting or accessing the Internet while operating a vehicle for all drivers, and bans the use of cell phones (talking or texting) for drivers under 18 years old. The city could consider enacting an ordinance that would further restrict use of cell phones (talking or texting) while driving within school zones. Other states and cities that have implemented this type of statute or ordinance include Texas, Arkansas, Illinois, and Kenosha, Wisconsin. Additional research would need to be done to determine whether such an ordinance is allowable under current Minnesota state law. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Create a pedestrian and bicycle safety public education campaign. Many drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists do not know or need to be reminded of basic safety rules and practices, such as parking near crosswalks and yielding to pedestrians in crosswalks. Campaigns that educate or remind drivers of their responsibilities and rights in keeping bicyclists and pedestrians safe and in following the mpmvwnwd it", S�Sj� Kimley > > >Horn 24 H E A L T H R E F O R M rules of the road, combined with enforcement of those rules, will benefit all users. Implementation lead: City of Edina and Edina Public Schools, with support from Bloomington Public Health. ■ Monitor ARTS performance on at least an annual basis, including the use of student travel safe Routes to School Students Arrival and Departure Tally Sheet tallies and other measurements. The travel ...�•- �•�••���• + ra.Y ro hM./.fYY Oev fadohl.Y lYSe tallies provide an easy way to track changes in M. htl IIwY. O t t.wo.A IWI.NYlM14Y.WWGYdm walking and biking and this data is also needed Ef— w OD to support funding applications. Other measures that could be utilized are performance on physical fitness tests, safety data such as pedestrian and bicycle crashes, or traffic congestion and parking on school sites. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools and City of Edina, with support from Bloomington Public Health. ■ Establish a permanent Edina Active Routes to. School Working Group. The purpose of the Active Routes working group would be to provide on -going support and organization for walking and biking activities, as well as maintain communication and coordination among each of the agencies that have a role in walking and biking to school (City, School District, Public Travel Tally form created by the National Centerfor Health, etc.). Some potential activities that the Safe Routes to School working group may want to consider are planning of a Walk /Bike to School Day, organizing a family walking /biking even outside the school day, and preparation of funding applications. The working group should also lead and assist in future goal- setting for ARTS, such as percentage of students walking and biking to each school and district - wide. Implementation lead: City of Edina and Edina Public Schools. • Conduct a study of pedestrian and bicycle routes and connectivity in southeast Edina. Some key barriers to walking and biking to school in southeast Edina are due to the limited number, condition, and accessibility of facilities to cross TH 62 and TH 100. A larger study of this area is needed to identify the preferred location and design for new or improved facilities in this area to provide routes and connect to schools and other community destinations. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Continue or initiate site -level walking and biking activities. The most successful Active Routes programs have site -level champions and leaders that engage teachers, parents, and students in walking and biking activities on an on -going basis. The champion could be a principal, teacher, or parent and consideration should be given to involving these leaders in the Edina Active Routes to School Working Group. Site -level programs and activities could include holding designated weekly or monthly walk /bike to school days, training and scheduling of adult crossing guards, initiation of walking school buses or bicycle trains, organization of classroom competitions for number of miles walked /biked, or similar ideas to encourage increased walking and biking. As part of these activities, additional student surveys could be utilized to identify why students do not currently walk or bike "e,�e u Kimlep Horn 17MPf - Program I O1 A � � 25 H E A L T H RE F O R M . O D EEO 0- MIMM I o � biking to school (City, School District, Public Travel Tally form created by the National Centerfor Health, etc.). Some potential activities that the Safe Routes to School working group may want to consider are planning of a Walk /Bike to School Day, organizing a family walking /biking even outside the school day, and preparation of funding applications. The working group should also lead and assist in future goal- setting for ARTS, such as percentage of students walking and biking to each school and district - wide. Implementation lead: City of Edina and Edina Public Schools. • Conduct a study of pedestrian and bicycle routes and connectivity in southeast Edina. Some key barriers to walking and biking to school in southeast Edina are due to the limited number, condition, and accessibility of facilities to cross TH 62 and TH 100. A larger study of this area is needed to identify the preferred location and design for new or improved facilities in this area to provide routes and connect to schools and other community destinations. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Continue or initiate site -level walking and biking activities. The most successful Active Routes programs have site -level champions and leaders that engage teachers, parents, and students in walking and biking activities on an on -going basis. The champion could be a principal, teacher, or parent and consideration should be given to involving these leaders in the Edina Active Routes to School Working Group. Site -level programs and activities could include holding designated weekly or monthly walk /bike to school days, training and scheduling of adult crossing guards, initiation of walking school buses or bicycle trains, organization of classroom competitions for number of miles walked /biked, or similar ideas to encourage increased walking and biking. As part of these activities, additional student surveys could be utilized to identify why students do not currently walk or bike "e,�e u Kimlep Horn 17MPf - Program I O1 A � � 25 H E A L T H RE F O R M G and what incentives might influence them. Particularly at the middle and high school levels, these types of activities can be initiated or led by student councils or "green" teams. Additional ideas and resources are available from the National Center for Safe Routes to School, which is included in the Resources section of this plan. Implementation lead: Edina School District. ■ Develop a walking and biking section of the school district website. Walking and biking should be treated as equal transportation alternatives to riding the y PUBLIC SCHO°OiS o school bus. The webpage should list' pedestrian and bicycle safety rules and tips and could also contain the school walk /bike~° maps. The school district's page should also -��- be coordinated and linked to the city's webpage listing walking and bicycling. resources. Implementation lead: Edina Public ..".4T.4"!••nr4 . Y...FrO..1d.L..Nn,, Ili Y4Y.n..F..r....Y ktl41,,,¢A!1„E, Schools, with support from Bloomington .•...- .. 4.... 4... .,�.....F.,....F.......�....... Y.a,a.. ..........F. -r«+Y. e.4.rY....F..Y. -.. an.,4n.,awb Public Health. .ra.. Yawn r..rr.ewr"r.rrY.e. ru.en IOi®MN..Ir..YYrt.r.ew YY W YwJ1.- ■ Establish a citywide policy for crosswalk NIrO r.""r.rA Y.Y.p- bYYY..•A..r.Y r.rMY. MV. "w¢w.FrYm Y4+M1W Y.rtlw fM.lur laN 44r�4Fa.FInA+ r..FM Y rF r. v.r MM I ui -I- M. .aaw markings. Minnesota state statute 169.21 states that drivers must stop for pedestrians �° "'•`- ..._..r.,.r,... rr`" M.4FYY 4./1 rlrrr.er..Fei. rF 4-F rr.-r +w Wl.r "MUr Wr .sRFMw'.1.4 "M/I.nMM.Y.�w /.w.wr al4M F..frF� srd.elrwr 4r..WYr, /. Y.. rr.rq•WYRw uYIM� in a marked or unmarked crosswalk. There are many unmarked crosswalks in Edina, as Example of walking /biking section of Minneapolis Public well as crosswalks marked in one of several Schools website styles, including parallel lines (also referred to as transverse markings), zebra (also known as continental markings), and patterned. The zebra crosswalks are considered to be high visibility markings, and have been shown in studies to be detected by drivers further in advance of parallel markings' and may improve pedestrian safety at intersections$. However, the high visibility markings are also more costly to install and maintain. Examples of marked crosswalk types A policy establishing criteria for installation and standardization of marked crosswalks and high visibility markings across the entire city should be created, with locations such as mid -block `ISHI Kimley > >) Horn 26 H E A L T H R E F O R M crossings and school patrolled crossings identified as prioritized locations for high visibility markings. Per the standards in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD) and guidance from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), patterned pavements or markings must have two white parallel lines to be considered a marked crosswalk. Implementation lead: City of Edina. ■ Incorporate specific language regarding walking and biking to school into the school district wellness policy. The language of the current policy could be strengthened to encourage walking and biking to school as having health benefits, as well as environmental benefits around the school. Having this type of policy can also mitigate potential liability concerns. Several example policies are provided below. The Minnesota Public Health Law Center also has resources and training available to help address this issue, including a summary of liability for schools. This document has been included in the Resources section of the Appendix. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. • National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity: The school district will assess and, if necessary and to the extent possible, make needed improvements to make it safer and easier for students to walk and bike to school. When appropriate, the district will work together with local public works, public safety, and /or police departments in those efforts. The school district will explore the availability of federal "safe routes to school" funds, administered by the state department of transportation, to finance such improvements. • Clinton Central School District, New York: Clinton Central School District will work with school board members, parents, and local public works and police personnel to implement a "SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL" program in support of walking /biking to school. • Marin County Office of Education, California: While Morin County has a number of transportation concerns, there has been increasing funding in the County to improve routes for safe walking and biking. Districts should encourage parents and students to walk and bike to school where safe routes are available and assist parents in organizing adult supervised groups. Parent and student groups may also consider assessing walking and biking access to their school and apply for funding to improve this access ■ Modify city ordinance language to allow bicycling on sidewalks. Current city ordinance prohibits bicycle riding on sidewalks anywhere in the city. However, guidance by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) suggests that children aged 10 and under do not have the judgment and skills to ride on the roadway. Even many high school aged and adult bicyclists do not feel comfortable riding in an on- street facility, particularly on higher volume roadways or where there is not a dedicated bicycle facility. Most municipalities in Minnesota and nationwide do not prohibit riding bicycles on sidewalks, except in specific areas with high pedestrian volumes such as central business districts. To improve the ability for bicyclists of all abilities to comfortably travel through the city, the existing ordinance should be modified to allow for bicycling on sidewalks subject to several conditions including yielding to pedestrians, riding at lower speeds, and not riding on sidewalks where posted. Implementation lead: City of Edina. ■ Incorporate walking and bicycling safety education into the physical education curriculum. Walking and bicycling safely are life -long skills for a healthy lifestyle. Students should receive education and training about how to safely walk and bicycle to school, with or without sidewalks, as well as how to safely cross at intersections. Examples of physical education curricula are found in the Resources section of this plan. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. Mrovemerd 15IL JJLTP H E A L T H R E F O R M 27 Kimley *Horn t.� OPI Mid -Term Improvements • Create a program to improve bicycle parking at all schools. Many of the existing bicycle racks on the school sites are poorly located and are older style racks that provide less secure parking. These should be systematically replaced over the next five years. Bicycle corrals should be considered for the middle school and high school sites, which have the greatest potential for high bicycle mode share. In addition, bicycle parking capacity should be increased to meet the criteria of one bicycle parking space per 10 students. A funding stream would need to be identified to complete the systematic replacement and enhancement of bicycle parking at all school sites. Implementation lead: Edina Public New bicycle parking at Creek Valley Elementary Schools. • Designate a district ARTS coordinator. Individual school sites need support to plan and implement walking and biking education and activities. Coordination of resources and events across the district will maximize the effectiveness of these efforts, as well as providing a single point of contact for school administration and other agencies such as the City of Edina and Bloomington Public Health. The ARTS coordinator would be able to assist schools in implementing encouragement activities such as walking school buses, remote pick -up /drop -off, and walking /biking events. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. • Improve the surface and maintenance of the trail connection from Creek Valley Road to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School. The existing trail provides a very direct connection to the middle and high schools, but would be usable for more students if it was widened, repaved, and was also maintained during the winter. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. ' • Construct pedestrian ramps at the school . crossing at W 72nd Street /Oaklawn Avenue. The intersection lacks pedestrian ramps, which are needed for accessibility for all pedestrians. Implementation lead: _. City of Edina. • Evaluate effectiveness of school speed - - zone signing and establish city policy for use of school speed zones. The currently - -- posted school speed zones are all signed to be in effect "When Children Are Present ". Past studies have drawn The school crossing on W 72nd Street near Cornelia differing conclusions on the driver Elementary lacks pedestrian ramps Statewide w Health SF Improvement ! Program H E A L T H R E F 0 R Rd 28 Kimley >> )Horn response to this type of static signing, static signing stating the times the speed zone was in effect, and /or the inclusion of flashers. However, many of the other studies were conducted on high speed (greater than 45 mph) roadways. Evaluating the speed zone compliance and effect of signing and flashers within Edina should be used to determine the appropriate city -wide standard for existing and any new school speed zones. Implementation lead. Edina Public Schools. Long -Term Improvements • Reconstruct and narrow the driveways at Cornelia Elementary School. The existing driveways onto Cornelia Drive are both very wide and results in a vehicle /pedestrian conflicts and right -of -way confusion. The driveways should be reconstructed to shorten the crossing distances for pedestrians. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. • Construct sidewalk on W 58th Street east of Wooddale Avenue. The city's Comprehensive Plan identified sidewalk to be constructed on' W 58th Street all the way to France Avenue. W 58th Street is already a primary route for South View Middle School students, and extending the existing sidewalk east of Wooddale Avenue will continue to improve connectivity and routes to the school. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk connection from Ayrshire Boulevard to Highlands Elementary School. Highlands Elementary students that live in the neighborhood east and north of the school along Ayrshire Boulevard within % mile of the school, but due to the lack of direct roadway or sidewalk route, either walk between residential homes and through the wooded area next to the school, or walk more than % mile to school with part of the route along the heavily traveled Vernon Avenue. An easement should be pursued in order to build a direct and more comfortable sidewalk connection from Highlands Elementary to the neighborhoods surrounding the school. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools and City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk or trail on Interlachen Boulevard. A trail was previously proposed along Interlachen Boulevard in 2006, but was not approved, and this sidewalk segment was removed from the city's Comprehensive plan. Interlachen Boulevard, although not serving as a direct route to a school site, is one of the few opportunities for a direct east -west route in the northern part of the city. This sidewalk or trail segment could also then be connected to Highlands Elementary School via Mirror Lakes Drive and Highlands Park. The primary segment that would most benefit Highlands Elementary would be from Summit Avenue to Rolling Green Parkway or Bywood West, with the remaining segment to the west considered .as a secondary priority. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on Cornelia Drive from W 70th Street to W 66th Street. Sidewalk on Cornelia Drive currently ends just north of W 70th Street, and does not connect to Lake Cornelia Park or the existing sidewalk on W 66th Street. This segment of sidewalk was previously removed from the sidewalk plan in the city's Comprehensive Plan, but is an important north -south sidewalk link between France Avenue and TH 100. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk connection on Oaklawn Avenue to Cornelia Elementary School. This segment of sidewalk is identified in the city's Comprehensive Plan and would complete the sidewalk network from the Parklawn neighborhood to Cornelia Elementary. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk connection from Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue near Cornelia Elementary School. Cornelia Elementary students that live in the multi - family housing along 96h_ StateMda nt Program ITImproveme I01 J1 H E A L T H R E F O R M W KimlepMorn Parklawn Avenue are within /: mile of the z r school, but due to the lack of direct r� * Cornelia4p o -Y j rt roadway or sidewalk route, must walk C •„a, : �4 + approximately one mile to school with part of the route along the heavily traveled France Avenue. An easement should be pursued in order to build a direct and more �t comfortable sidewalk connection from Parklawn Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue, which z ��'�`,��' - � ;•.; w mswortn DO } would benefit not only Cornelia Elementary students but also members of the �'t��a ' 4. community that use Cornelia School Park. R -y �t`,; it r Fonde�I Dr Implementation lead: City of Edina. ■ Construct sidewalk on Claremore Drive, Kellogg Avenue, and Wooddale Avenue;. sr,i �r t iGanord i r�+r1. near Cornelia Elementary School. These �- +� Y sidewalk segments are identified in the ,;. : =='% city's Comprehensive Plan and would improve accessibility and connectivity to the �' �• _ neighborhoods west of Cornelia Elementary. °, "Implementation lead: City of Edina. ' >�� Cx =�. y� i • Construct sidewalk on Valley View Road, potential sidewalk connection from Parklawn Avenue to Tracy Avenue, and Gleason Road. Oaklown Avenue These roadways are planned for repaving in the city's capital improvement program and are also identified for future sidewalk in the Comprehensive Plan. The sidewalk should be implemented along with the roadway projects, improving the connectivity between Creek Valley Elementary School, Valley View Middle School, and Edina High School and the neighborhoods south and west of the schools. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on Sun Road, Arbour Avenue, and Olinger Boulevard near Countryside Elementary School. These roadways are planned for repaving in the city's capital improvement program and are also identified for future sidewalk in the Comprehensive Plan. The sidewalk should be implemented along with the roadway projects, improving the connectivity between the school and the neighborhoods south and west of the school. Implementation lead: City of Edina. ■ _ Construct sidewalk on Benton Avenue adjacent to Countryside Elementary School. There is currently no sidewalk along Benton Avenue in front of the school, although it is shown in the city's Comprehensive Plan as future sidewalk. The existing walking /bicycling route to the east the school includes a set of stairs to reach Tracy Avenue, which is a challenge for bicyclists or mobility- impaired pedestrians. The sidewalk on Benton Avenue in front of the school would provide an alternate route for these users. Implementation lead: City of Edina. L `p`owt ISHIr H E A L T H R E F O R M 011 Kimley > >> Horn Funding and Implementation Funding for the various recommended projects may come from a variety of sources depending on the type of project and who is implementing it. Some potential funding opportunities that currently exist and may be used to fund these recommendations include, but are not limited to: • Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota • Mini - grants through the National Center for Safe Routes to School • Federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds administered through the Metropolitan Council • Safe Routes to School funds administered through the Minnesota Department of Transportation • Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Over the past four years, Minnesota Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) funds have been administered by the Minnesota Department of Health through cities and counties around the state in the form of Safe Routes to School grants, Active Living grants, and assistance with preparing grant applications for other programs. These funds may be available in some form in the future, and continued communications between school districts, cities, and counties will help identify opportunities and needs for funding in the future. No one of the E's of Safe Routes to School will by itself increase walking and biking, which emphasizes the need for cooperation among school, city, county and other agencies in the implementation of the recommendations identified in this plan. The process used to develop this plan is only the start of on- going efforts that will be needed to result in cultural changes and significant increases in walking and biking. stHealth atewide f �J'Tj[i Improvement A { Program I fl H E A L T H R E F O R M 31 Kimley ))' Horn Kimley>» Horn (` o azs as 1 mums Existing Figure 1. Edina City -Wide A g cycle and Pedestrian Conditions 0 3 ,+ta"1`� a 54th�St ,Richmond-Urr sir L H& 4,111 r l rr? ' •,� ' s Go bier � + R_ ,.sv 1 , � Ca °� i+Jdsor}4ve a/rehewO_ KV tir r� • + ; "'�E ;Y.Qi x >e ,� f Lake o s'• m Oak Dr �, ,�,• m` Pedestrian bridge L•ewngton'Ave# Q,�ewngton Ave } 3 ' t 56th�St w 2 �r� „, ti T r r 1 ti 'rn �� `` b rt'rn sstj`; .l:t Z2•.:ab c 4 •�� i��� r C t� 1�+ fit �;°`Lr¢ fin``= �C�. }���� {, i' �i ° � � U � •� 56th,St � ,s. Kelb PI t t c' a c o o Kk y, 99 tom:* t Lake �, r „� .. a S�;�o� f,i �� t�R �?� �,G F�' �• v`�'Q . A �. : t� r �f��.F�,l i•t' ` " b" . '�,,'� '' -. �yS yy��. � , . T°0wer. yr ,�I ., r-T .t $�� O , Z� L r, I i•�N ! " +.• ,! iC'1 � i� �� � �, �r�f . South�Vlew,Ln 1 st s w Melody'_ ' Woodland Rd'_ s Lake � � �� � 11� � , `a��, .�,� • ' •�� :� 1'� Park { a Normariid, Elementary �s c ri a7. �' "} bridge _ J I },COncord4Ter �,yx�,GroveSt Pedestrian _ >tr�� r to `3v 4Gi 9 r- fi + Phllbrook Ln South View Middle School t• �,) ` :• : t.,,4 �, r' 58tniStti� �- s > QLj i Ni Q VIL �`.1 rsur ¢ 4n' �� i a ,.,'Q :d� '�Oir "�. t' � Iki'S i, �g7i3• � •,� �,,. � :. �� Y . • iJ y 'y,yi. @ �,' .Ma` 4'.i r t w : y �''gy. 1,.:` - O I �, *5 }.9:•.b+ �!� _ i fito. +"� • «f- Benton•Ave Concord Elementary U r T_', • a K'59tti.St yAQE �, r 59th St ° 59th S t g t rI j�_xi: .e�'.r�����. - SchoolRd ' -'� 4., c: .�A•�� .7�5* ai 60th:St . � r•s r � 11 � t � • �> Ll dr. n ltr,T t.-;5 ,•. J�,�,���♦ r '�1. �' c s60th +St .r .rcny i y Y T. f t .a t c�k N s r' 61 t S[ _ ta'` VBll�y�`�VJewa 62ndtSc u2nd:S: v�• Virginia *Ln' a','D / "_ Legend t- - � 62nd St o , iyf f�a {z . y �. >. c Traffic Signal Hobe -ts;Pl All -Way Stop � 63rd:St c Signed Pedestrian Crossing Southview Middle School 33rd,S. - �,3r,! ` : Marked School Crossing 5' Enrollment: 1,294 students School Patrolled Intersection Number in walk zone: 250 students Sidewalks Normandale Elementary School (- on Street BicycleFaality nroliment: 639 students I off Street Trail .umber in walk zone: 58 students I >: •, r < U Bike Racks •2 — � _ i Ji6l— . Concord Elementary - _Speed Zone 0 Enrollment 730 students 6� err Half Mile Radius Number in walk zone: 158 students `� I Kil'rileY >>)Horn'SHII It- .". f ' n 0 225 450 900 Feet Figure 2. Concord & Normandale Elementary and • E r r • C....al 11:..... Enrollment 551 students l° Legend 9 Number i n walk zone: 165 students s Lake Ut ��� signal ' Cornelia �: • E 1 '`y� -•• �_ r All -way Stop Park , Signed Pedestrian Crossing 66th St,� {.ys ` Marked School Crossing School Patrolled Intersedion Lake f t+ Sidewalks ` Correia 1� r On Street Bicycle Facility 'mi �iyy$,��S�y,�'` ♦ ,+ L�'�•' q 4 �fyR. r y Ni ,' Off Street Trail . Bike Racks . � j�Nr.1 y„�a � �v� �'�' ,•r Or �'tf � LSn'• A'- yL - Speed Zone Half Mile Radius R,�oycargR�d '� {.. C�. - t i e �. - R� �, , � y'T` •y � #�'S,° r� ,�ti t� � � !"jrl 'r', L� .t a 4 " .�., :+. E "8alfan� tRd w• ti+, ,r �T a''y3`r. y� -�' a •} - rP�' I t. �;,5.''rP �'+ } lr Oe.`., >+.•aat. . x ��,r _ ♦t \ x :Wtlford�W r `, r i ,',C41 '!i t`'�`y..t ti. r S. tE ; O F' A . 5 41 r- iyf y a5 �C; •� S� 1' > # + yt YS�t�"s to � - Enhanced crosswalks j! x Al 'a` .f ,f;,�gi,f 'c.: •. U)i.. ;a� f ji _ _ � . � Ganefla � 1' ±I•'f. •r• 1. + � xf�i, R' %� � A': i. _ 9 1 /•••••' 1 k 92! N.l 4! t l jj � Cornelia Ele Ientaryn r o +1 Arneson Acres r +?rye 1'` t' t'" Rd a,: " gndover , Park tw 3x �c �N High traffic volumes ¢° and speeding concerns Mavelle'Dr Belvidere Ln Y t ' Irlazelton•R'd Pedestrian /vehicle f.�wz7, %,+ .k ffi� g "+�or�'r�•I? I con flicts at driveways w� a UL 72 M !S f r r.. Q 4N Op ryEr F Kv °!'_ - [ t � .: C�- Y�• °il 'k Y+'�� r[' v -3 � r . rf� �: ; �,.'� Fs.Jf -. 1�� of 'u ` , fe . ' ��,c ,,,k�'K" K Q. : , :t l • �: ,t^� _... ct - Fondell,D[cT,� 40 �r r •` ay y r Centennial r. Ph .. ;; ' " r.;. +• Lake S :1.001 10ute gap �:: Hrbiscus'Ave, -erns` k teri-� 1 5 Parklawnt v Lake {� .. s, sr• t a F IY� v rY Y .� f2,r' a Edina + I I.. i Sedum l 'n ry iJ �� Paz�•Dra -jacri -� y-- Lake Edina Park K�mle�r >> >Harn k- SHIP n 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 3. Cornelia Elementary w r r . „1 nn., Enrollment: 584 students Number i n walk zone: 137 students Bmdeaen Park 0 Howkeo Lake ^' rosswalks ko '';,.'Coun side Elementary: Countryside p --fflmz Park Q. ColonialiiW CP ox Ct 'AF ` I - N 0 310 620 1, 240 Feet Figure 4. Countryside Elementary rV7., Legend T Signal 1. All-Way Stop Signed Pedestrian Crossing Marked School Crossing .1 School Patrolled Intersection LV Sidewalks F. i On Street Bicycle Facility Off Street Trail Bike Racks Speed Zone '�Half Mile Radius, rh rosswalks ko '';,.'Coun side Elementary: Countryside p --fflmz Park Q. ColonialiiW CP ox Ct 'AF ` I - N 0 310 620 1, 240 Feet Figure 4. Countryside Elementary f= ,'ftt 'R L ;f Krahl Hill s •. Bredesen t, o{ r Park 4 - a rr' auley pff ``�rii.: • 'R�" �� 1,`� �' -t . _ _ - !� � r �. boo .���. lk� - t '� 'bdt"►'i� ;FA .o � Rea OXCt9' �fic.s ` Creek Valley School Park . ar Creek Valley Elementary fi > Q >; High traffic N i r volumes 3itv!" :ir:�• ya.1,.. t`I.t -.. �w'7.' ii,�5,� k!} cir�' h Vehicles queue onto kvalleYIRd t Gleason Rd during pick -up Height Enhanced 8alde, n , .� t} ,� Park f z crosswalks y .. .�j� � ' � { • r' -off i > °� �' � Y•'E � u' .;` �� t , W o. ? �k �i< t;"$ '• C o - 1ICU a x2 ' + ; Edina High School > � fi'- t er , 'i son � V "i�?� nrq�s ; .. " . f Valley,View Middle School_ C +rr J " "r.�•.ti,C tr e:��.rp at Y� R.F. : �q, 'i 'a£�r��.p�_+,,����� ,��,— Valley ;,ViewRd�[—�{.�ygy�,��1j &�� 2.4;1' - r.. !�1{:e,t. '"ti :. 'r dr7" �71a!' �:..... 6. t�tr��• . .a4.�:F•- �34.';•�W'a�• ?,.`�.r?l �,e.. Speed Zone s , anti tr, jl Half Mile Radius } � 137 KF • 1 cy5 •� `° ' Shane•Dr p� ' 69th�St +. Enrollment: 607 stud t ents + °� Number in walk zone: 62 students Y-�. C KililIeVOHorn k" �ISHIP N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 5. Creek Valley Elementary " "' ° Cv.c4in r. r�r 1itin Mnn S, lbTt ti ' � #♦ f � t , W o. ? �k �i< t;"$ '• C o - 1ICU a x2 ' + ; Edina High School > � fi'- t er , 'i son � V "i�?� nrq�s ; .. " . f Valley,View Middle School_ C +rr J " "r.�•.ti,C tr e:��.rp at Y� R.F. : �q, 'i 'a£�r��.p�_+,,����� ,��,— Valley ;,ViewRd�[—�{.�ygy�,��1j &�� 2.4;1' - r.. !�1{:e,t. '"ti :. 'r dr7" �71a!' �:..... 6. t�tr��• . .a4.�:F•- �34.';•�W'a�• ?,.`�.r?l �,e.. Speed Zone s , anti tr, jl Half Mile Radius } � 137 KF • 1 cy5 •� `° ' Shane•Dr p� ' 69th�St +. Enrollment: 607 stud t ents + °� Number in walk zone: 62 students Y-�. C KililIeVOHorn k" �ISHIP N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 5. Creek Valley Elementary " "' ° Cv.c4in r. r�r 1itin Mnn S, lbTt ti ' � #♦ Legend:T 7hG Traffic Signal Indianhead All -Way Stop Lake �? Signed Pedestrian Crossing? f Marked School Crossing School Patrolled Intersection G Sidewalks On Street Bicycle Facility , f qy r Street Trail U Bicycle Racks OhlOff . cS l t , W o. ? �k �i< t;"$ '• C o - 1ICU a x2 ' + ; Edina High School > � fi'- t er , 'i son � V "i�?� nrq�s ; .. " . f Valley,View Middle School_ C +rr J " "r.�•.ti,C tr e:��.rp at Y� R.F. : �q, 'i 'a£�r��.p�_+,,����� ,��,— Valley ;,ViewRd�[—�{.�ygy�,��1j &�� 2.4;1' - r.. !�1{:e,t. '"ti :. 'r dr7" �71a!' �:..... 6. t�tr��• . .a4.�:F•- �34.';•�W'a�• ?,.`�.r?l �,e.. Speed Zone s , anti tr, jl Half Mile Radius } � 137 KF • 1 cy5 •� `° ' Shane•Dr p� ' 69th�St +. Enrollment: 607 stud t ents + °� Number in walk zone: 62 students Y-�. C KililIeVOHorn k" �ISHIP N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 5. Creek Valley Elementary " "' ° Cv.c4in r. r�r 1itin Mnn ��;SHIF N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 6. Highlands Elementary Kimlev O Horn � E , i , , . E n ��.�.:�� ���a:.:��� Kfi- I Countryside S .piper a Park lolonial' Way crs ° Q; Cree Iley School Park ti + a� r,Va�lley {V w•Rdk= x�r 4" tCreek Valley Elementary , r`, nt ^�rfj t Sidewalk ' r tDoron in,, ord _ P- V' er �,r� A gap C c a is Ci s hL�O ��aTa �Cr eKvall y Rd r� v F � ivy:'t Heights fv y1 yy' eT s.5 Park tH Satz. Kt` q h# ��i' t;�..�` ,Pfn. BalderrL +n�' 1'.'�,l', ` ,`kf ,!.• , { Lake 111sM ft mss`' ,,�.1 "1� .�i"E I f7'4 f .,`ii �9 , ,r # 0 4 H'�'; • �+ �,. 4 Lock lear r. ky ✓t �. -F�d+., •F t .r Ky ���{- .� -V�' ,. �i � '��`e T� e ?i f�� - r ,TE..4L � % � s.�j�'y��yO`t, I w.'ti ,rz ,� ty�7�' -+1nr i`i v.E �r;,3 - �`� :.KM= T f• - R. a4 V.1 C`1F� c M1Y 'Y 66th•St rofra`�'+..�" ° . 0 . 4, ;Yz TiCif it1X 660 d "•d a i + ', t.. ,fir v` r N Z' -4 hod Edina High Sc ��t d + "Grac Ke' rtonTef�'% W4, i� �m t�nv7i .� r � is�C7f6 k e ;U f Staff directs"# Irr 111R� L;6 , �,� '�2' traffic at � .,: � tµ • .� ...L,= i - �,-•§ ' ''^ Valley,View Middle School - dismissal Susan'Ave ' Indian ad�t� z x e4: _ rte, '{"��r�� Lake " �� . �, — -- -- Valley -Vle E2d• — ';,"t' �j 68thISt J, fki. if µ'by' d 1 Pedestrian /vehicle High traffic volumes and congestion before conflicts 9 �{ & Dr 1 Y s and after school � :L¢ <<Y `X�+ �!.`� fj F> ty �t . , >•. _ ! <. e69th St: oGul `v' � k �9'� M t�',f •'�f' YZ a +� ��'" , �� + �, �i t -3, t0: ' 1,F'xf'tErin Te a� �l 1��'• ���[� r�t «. '�i.���, ! , ��i: -i•. t • c Q '. i , R S •- dy�_=-�,�a U f'- - •;� •lj `%F ;i -fir re i :d Legend ` �CF Traffic Signal tiF r� ,: 70th St F.° All -Way Stop o �r tom_ 7 t Sgned Pedestrian Crossing s1 t , t.. 'Marked School Crossing 4 it School Patrolled Intersection Sidewalks On Street Bicycle Facility Edina Hi School 9 r +r� +.,��'rx• fly { :;. Enrollment: 1,951 students Off Street Trail f4, i ' •` Number inwalk zone: 190 student. L] Bicycle Racks e, y - Speed Zone 1 �La�'�t ' Valley View Middle School Half Mile Radius r '' O ;'� ; Enrollment 1,362 students yyww a Number i n walk zone: 236 students Br8` "thT- S.•...� ,:.�� -F ..+tin';.: _.ti -• C. Ksmlev,O Horn � ISHI1 N 0 230 460 920 Feet Figure 7. Valley View Middle and 1. 1 . . . e + . a k r J:_ _ u:,..,.., o,.t -„ 1 Re.... ��-V..".Ikenbur-6 ark J A 2 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Park t —Fill, Par 50th S '0 Mirror 4igh ilk�Lake ML 169, rk Ybrk arvey Par ands.E emen ry Gardc n % - �uy S� - z :_ 1 - 6 � ) `'Par r _j Lake rl�ta le'l-lerri d 14orman Park FT I —S uth-VI&V a d1jSchool r Co u n try sid e_'E le Crta r y. I Pamela repc Pa Park J, -Elemeneary Park ii�� 2_._ Co'nc;rd' Bredesen Park Lakei S' Mp� Pamela e Park adit I Park A. '%rr 0 ead Creek Valley Qle�mentary nda 7 4 3h 11 X r n u.sf ark Locklear A s "ek Edp�a H,g.�,ScOoi!l 17 Cornelia Legend 1T Vndianhe��j S Lake� Edina SI..Is Yd ley VWN'Midsle-School 'V Z7 Sidewalks 14 6 On Street Bicycle Facility Tr Off Street Trail " e C: J 1, E I ntary ---- Proposed Sidewalks j Proposed Priority Regional Trail -'Hill Pa awls Pa ant Proposed Secondary Bicycle Route Lake, a a Proposed Primary Bicycle Route Lake ak j- Edina 0.7 Mile Walk Radius r- c' Park l. t 1 Mile Walk Radius Municipal Boundaries A Figure 8. Edina City-Wide Kimley>))Horn Planned Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Enrollment: 551 students n Legend r Number in walk zone: 165 students a a Lake N i 4EG Signal r o; Cornelia •`''; ' Park All-way Stop Signed Pedestrian Crossing °"'�66th St ^*4�Z�¢j� � 3 ` Marked School Crossing Lake School Patrolled lnterseclion `i > Cornelia Proposed Sidewalks t'�cv ��;!±� �} _ •�� � }E' ;' Proposed Priority Regional Trail pp= ►fin y -` _ fi , , �. ii Proposed Primary Bicycle Route •{�T� �t�� ;� �'A y '4•� S x "_ v� ." i Proposed Secondary Bicycle Route �Of ` �a9ur as o , Sidewalks P "`^9 �� On Street Bicycle Facility RoycarRd %t �1 r 4 vrr1�n hrh iOff Street Trail �Y•�� x ( >] Bike Racks Speed Zone '• ' �i. t''f aZ'; ¢ ♦ 4��`� ..3 .Y "l ! 1� i t• iJT"1n i'1F GC r Half Mile Radius ".. •L:J- 4� 7 +�s� ,•.. � iU \ r d;1' - � 'iI FJ t` '�y, , � J �f ��a . 'fl', Nfd OKr Z =Construct sidewalk RIM Lake Cornelia•,�� :� �"�" �Sii gip''. ..} ;�, •-�` m t .p$ O "t• � �o� Dunberry�Ln Improve bicycle parking ° -Her a t�7oth�St r ti eft E Y •.. �y; r C� �ay,'o el + a 1 n� �Cornella Elementary t� °�},��N# Arneson Acres r, . rtr` i �+:. t ;,• m m �t Park f dover Rd ;}�„ � ,. � i -. 1.'..q. y �� :';•may �,� r �.. � . � , � t r. I• �i • _ � m'�,P 1 f _ Construct sidewalk 4 N T connections •� i , °;, ";' 3,� ;�'-' Reconfigure driveway exit to HazeitO Rai narrow pedestrian conflict area Extend proposed ss °# 'tc�enia^:: h�� sidewalk to 70th 5t tip'�p 4x .am as t} Q�<`_Z., f 1 .r ifs o° ti � J �f`�' �',� �S1 � , -' r•(j;. �4,y as f.� r 'rye 1 y� �Nt -ter .. ly yp ' o i o + y' Construct pedestrian ramps ^ � Y�,+�:v 1W � - a y • Qj ig � a. 2 � t'1 a rte' T` ; l Centennial Gllford Dr ' Lake iFk Obtain easement and 1 1 construct sidewalk connection 1 Lake Edina Edina �SedumrLn r xi ,� 1 dO . rr+ •k.�. f �. asjrf .-,- >L,�ea M s Hoza,Dra a t �. •'� '����?'w' `.rjS yaJ i.tsJlz. ` '!1 `� Lake Edina Park L in11 V >>) Horn �IISHI ' N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 100. Cornelia Elementary 11 �'SHII' N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 10. Cornelia Elementary lCimlev >>)Horn .: F,�a� n .,____ �__�_.:___ 4; Enrollment 584 students Legend Number in walk zone: 137 students yrs ire! ly Signal Highlands Elementary I All-My Stop Signed Pedestrian Crossing X_ dy1woodi,yr- ed School Crossing School Patrolled Intersection xon�, o Sidewalks 2JI 5* On Street Bicycle Facility dzL•o RKA4� 'Off Street Trail !F 10, — L. Proposed Sidewalks Proposed Priority Regional Trail . L4:� Proposed Primary Bicycle Route A Hawker Proposed Secondary Bicycle Route Ric ge-Fa rK-Kc Lake V. El Bike Racks e )A Speed Zone .-011 Half Mile Radius v, Ylu Na rov Grove- I lb p Construct sidew alk as art c0i co �E of planned roadway project Q 11W WHO -Ave Cou n side E 9Menwry V coun rysidI6 Rd 1� r e ♦a fir. °' S 1•�1 1 +tt`t. �} it.. + t� butn'bi Construct sidewalk as part x1li Lxm of planned roadway project 46�f Highlandill1a, i,, crei air & WSI' Hunter 0." W. & i.t ,501* 7" Wr Bredesen WN Park Ridg6w'a 4 Oriole N C4 -' I Countryside A� Park d) 'MF6. Rwx nialiWa 01 res Y 'Z `4 61st- St Y ai P N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 11. Countryside Elementary Kim1m>)Horn A —1: — — — RX__ - 1sa C, A R A 01ingeru r" Bredesen St Park - ist 5, CG 211 �v effjP1 "Wr Krahl Hill '��"� = __ I w�tY Arctic,WaY JI r 'Geason'lZA EY10 on Am 1 C7. cuad 0 F ox 4 V Creek VQ�y School Park 4 M 11 Imp Improve bicycle parking &\ 1W `Creek Valley Elementary rd 4t Cre A eight! Balde Park riI A),' .c F�S- 9 ':' +ti, %` - t i . �r ' i@Y •: o M • � y.. `, '' Y �,. °. .a.1 '` ri y%r $' 7v 5 � s x�`�t J"y �' �q +Iro se `.'�� . FAiW73O��.�9 ` K �` �g�+'� .y' • . i � ��y.' - %. r ' `�C ssA�.`4Zk' 'Vii• 75 6z" _C5 Edina High School A Legen Traffic Signal 'JI ;z India nhead� Lake JI, J, S `Valley View Middle School 1=1 0-- Enrollment: 607 students Number in walk zone: 62 students Kimlev,0 Horn N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 12. Creek Valley Elementary All -Way Stop Signed Pedestrian Crossing ;Marked School Crossing School Patrolled Intersection Sidewalks On Street Bicycle Facility Off Street Trail Proposed Priority Regional Trail Proposed Sidewalks Proposed Primary Bicycle Route Proposed Secondary Bicycle Route Bicycle Racks Speed Zone ff" 'I 'Haff Mile Radius T, ;z India nhead� Lake JI, J, S `Valley View Middle School 1=1 0-- Enrollment: 607 students Number in walk zone: 62 students Kimlev,0 Horn N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 12. Creek Valley Elementary : •,� o '> r 0 yjL I te; L ci '1 ff d gam, c m CU C 4y` -: Py , U) ! I Construct sidewalk or trail a �' -Q � F o �'. 151 sthSt Highlands sore Ct Q LakeH n T �o yt o s : }''�'� •tijI•� 4u �, /� ♦ 4{ki'i,.Rii4!"�r NOrthWOad ;. Eat' i vii Cho' den\'L 'n �r, ' a i �' Y3 r '� m m ' :1 f1H+ciden , v ry h1m > :.F o IV 53rdtSt 6. o Obtain easement -b n L)Mr ' e and construct ate oxnrx Ljt °} �.. o ' rwP ?> ¢ Sidewalk Or 3 "A.511 .s,`rq� �`*a ��r rz #t ; trail connection 'SIR n'.i'. `rii' r�• k. i d• t, .,� 4` ",, B• `''ni' ?I• `� r 'w •. i•f i ��. s: •�t :� , - t . rt : '� hat'- - ��}',+ r'•i� ' f .,� '� K: I _ Highlands Elementary �,�� `� �t: , '► �� ��', ]`, { �� <; :er u�� .�fGi S ,i� a, '' Rtch O dDr Fk. °.YS• ;'? ?+.rs�`i�. fr' S Windsor.Av Windsor Ave Replace bike racks VIR HaWkeS m f + Ridge Par -R + r 1 Legend Lake` a Qt : Garden ° !d x' m i Park Traffic Signal All -way Stop �Ytr,N Warden Ave' —L j Signed Pedestrian Crossing Marked School Crossing :..X School Patrolled Intersection - oj'' f. FC ti GfOVB�St w3 '..J Q�r i d � - "�; ♦ ae , . � `{• 1 Sidewalks • ' v, f � . � . � m a '•o a +' .' 1 = St. m ` + c On Street Bicycle Facility /yc Off Street Trail ° Amyt Dr, {Q - tQ', le�'Gir }v�` `� '' �` ,� y�i Proposed Sidewalks .r, ��� "' 3 r r•' ' '♦";• �h „� ;, Proposed Priority Regional Trail ° „�Benton�Ave ,�1 i Proposed Primary Bicycle Route Proposed Secondary Bicycle Routr Co on u n ementa tryside Elry a Bike Racks. Enrollment 555 students w yfo r . ' • ,• s — - =Speed zone Number in walk zone: 67 students , Countryside Rd>t� +'�' If Mile Radius ` %1 •� �aY atL irillev ?> >Horn tZ,SH11. N 0 310 620 1,240 Feet Figure 13. Highlands Elementary I n, __j –4.* nn. .� i JN �� t r. 4 �'t #•' Countryside y; -`, Sandpi~ 1d Park f Pei Ytj 1 m� • r �a��' c � a, 1= moo, ; �' Colonial • }� t M , - /�♦ ••'fit �"•' y 1 ,.�:� rv�l * Cree Iley School �Nrk 5:�„iUalley�Uew1Rdt- �e yi-a = Improve surface and R +ttil z maintenance of trail �t� °= eft` ��`Creek Valley Elementary � Doro n Ln i Construct sidewalk oar t ,�� ����@ �'' '� a�'. i` "��' 3 � r tr, 5};'. . °+ .:•. � �i !�S - va11e`J 1 �^ 00`;J,a"' �r , - 'l•.i�isr �i'� r.Ct , .. .0 ,y�':'. , 11 - '' 4 i _ Heights *r�,s�z #' Install bike corral g ,w` r.' �dei K } 1�iSSj� , �, G� Park Lake ell Locklear,�11 . A' .,�r, �fi{ 3 . F ijRr. .; i� s r ".1.+"O #�v�° - i1 rF ''3�:•t -[c:. + } i• to F ' L '' t r�.,'f �' R� 1 r,6Lr = 1': _ p 6St - 1 c t. ' i. '4' R t `J- a ,� r Edina High Schod YygS# Grade Ter 3: . fA -•7`G ..}L. sy -"ril � �'i --� rn..3'^�i'7 i ntgansC' c. y ' Valley. View Middle School{ s+ari.AVe Indian ad1 T ` �f�i �� r Im prove bicycle parking Lake vitm 1 Consolidate driveway access /pedestrian crossing y BrookiDr— — i :CI 1 t Shd" F' t i < Legend Construct proposed sidewalk as 69tn st cGui °' ••� a,�� �; Traffic Signal part of planned roadway paving : Park Rd All Way Stop �ir .'q 4 t!a > t VN tti \ Signed Pedestrian Crossing Marked School Crossing ;� a� #� ?s'1 5'" a+�C� r1'�'�fi -i �ir70th'St ;irr`:1� .. School Patrolled Intersection pr, Sidewalks r 'rt � _E On Street Bicycle Facility ;?,. „"� >' wti ?.•n �'�`; r ac�< tr`` _ Off Street Trail r +'!,�s�r ', �e��1•!p x '�� r Proposed Sidewalks.,isp, ' Proposed Priority Regional Trail A -_ Proposed Primary Bicycle Route Y" ° ray`. ,{?f �F Edina High School C. Proposed Secondary Bicycle Route { i'�f Enrollment: 1,951 students = >�ia ` ` , Number in walk zone: 190 students ( Bicycle Racks —_ Speed Zone +� y. r ' ¢ r o Valley View Middle School Half Mile Radius,k�;sD� s o Enrollment: 1,362 students �� Number in walk zone: 236 students _Braemar oi- Kimlevi>) Horn ►C SHV N 0 230 460 920 Feet Figure 14. Valley View Middle and Appendix :-,L. f° . — . SCH Wks. rz SPIeWranllSHI� -' A_1 Kimley > > >Horn Health Improvement _ ro9 H E A L T H R E F O R M Student Travel Tallv Results ISHIT H E A L T H R E F O R M A -2 Kimley >> )Horn J Modes To /From School (Fall 2012) School Walk Bike School Bus Family Carpool Other Vehicle AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Concord 5% 10% 61116 6% 551,16 56% 30% 25% 4% 3% 0% 0% Elementary Cornelia 8% 11% 5% 5% 48% 47% 28% 25% 2% 3% 9% 9% Elementary Countryside 10% 11% 2% 2% 46% 49% 41% 35% 1% 3% 0% 0% Elementary Creek Valley 5% 6% 6% 6% 60% 60% 28% 26% 1% 2% 0% 0% Elementary Highlands 3% 5% 0% 0% 59% 63% 35% 27% 3% 4% 0% 1% Elementary Normandale 4% 7% 1% 2% 66% 50% 28% 35% 1% 3% 0% 3% Elementary South View 6% 12% 1% 0% 57% 57% 32% 28% 2% 0% 2% 3% Middle School Valley View 9% 16% 1% 2% 59% 60% 29% 20% 2% 2% 0% 0% Middle School Average 7% 9% 3% 3% 56% 55% 31% 28% 2% 3% 1% 1 2% ISHIT H E A L T H R E F O R M A -2 Kimley >> )Horn J Parent Survey Results School Number of Survey Responses Concord Elementary 66 Cornelia Elementary 27 Countryside Elementary 38 Creek Valley Elementary 27 Highlands Elementary 22 Normandale Elementary 41 South View Middle School 48 Valley View Middle School 57 Edina High School 38 Total 364 Question 1. What is the erade of the child who broueht home this survev? School PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9 10 11 12 Concord 0% 10% 10% 20% 17% 26% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Cornelia 11% 4% 15% 30% 18% 15% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Countryside 5% 16% 21% 3% 21% 29% 3% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Creek Valley 0% 7% 7% 19% 26% 26% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Highlands 4% 18% 27% 14% 18% 5% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Normandale 0% 15% 15% 15% 12% 15% 24% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% Elementary South View 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 4% 29% 29% 19% 17% 0% 0% 0% Middle School Valley View 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 23% 35% 12% 0% 0% 0% Middle School Edina High 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 34% 21% 42% School Average 1 2% 7% 9% 10% 11% 13% 9% 9% 8% 8% 4% 4% 2% 4% SH� A_3 Kimley >>> Horn ve H E A L T H R E F O R M Question 2. Is the child who brought home this survey male or female? School Male Female Concord Elementary 65% 35% Cornelia Elementary 44% 56% Countryside Elementary 39% 61% Creek Valley Elementary 59% 41% Highlands Elementary 59% 41% Normandale Elementary 46% 54% South View Middle School 52% 48% Valley View Middle School 58% 42% Edina High School 45% 55% Average 53% 47% Question 3. How manv children do you have in Kindergarten through 8th grade? School 0 1 2 3 4 S+ Concord Elementary 0% 26% 42% 27% 5% 0% Cornelia Elementary 7% 45% 44% 4% 0% 0% Countryside Elementary 5% 42% 37% 10% 3% 3% Creek Valley Elementary 0% 15% 59% 22% 4% 0% Highlands Elementary 5% 59% 18% 18% 0% 0% Normandale Elementary 0% 34% 49% 12% 5% 0% South View Middle School 8% 37% 40% 15% 0% 0% Valley View Middle School 7% 39% 46% 5% 3% 0% Edina High School 76% 16% 5% 0% 0% 3% Average 12% 34% 39% 13% 2% 1% sP I SHI� Kimley > >> Horn Improvement A -4 H E A L T H R E F O R M Question 6. On most days, how does your child arrive and leave for school? Arrive to School Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. 5ta, °e Kimley > >> Horn !rw Program ISHIr A -5 H E A L T H R E F O R M IM Family Carpool Other Vehicle (children (skateboard, School (only Transit School Walk Bike Bus children in from (city bus) scooter, other inline skates, your families) etc.) family) Concord Elementary 8% 5% 65% 20% 3% 0% 0% Cornelia Elementary 19% 0% 56% 19% 0% 0% 4% Countryside 24% 3% 39% 32% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Creek Valley 7% 4% 67% 22% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Highlands Elementary 0% 0% 73% 27% 0% 0% 0% Normandale 0% 0% 71% 27% 2% 0% 0% Elementary South View Middle 6% 8% 58% 27% 0% 0% 0% School Valley View Middle 12% 4% 58% 25% 2% 0% 0% School Edina High School 8% 0% 32% 29% 29% 0% 0% Average 9% 3% 57% 25% 4% 0% 0% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. 5ta, °e Kimley > >> Horn !rw Program ISHIr A -5 H E A L T H R E F O R M IM Question 6 (continued). On most days, how does your child arrive and leave for school? I pnuv frnm trhnnl Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. SaHe Kimley > > >Harn Improvement Program A -6 H E A L T H R E F O R M Family Carpool Other Vehicle (children (skateboard, School Walk Bike School (only from Transit scooter, Bus children in other (city bus) inline skates, your families) etc.) family) Concord Elementary 12% 1 3% 67% 18% 0% 0% 0% Cornelia Elementary 26% 0% 56% 11% 0% 0% 4% Countryside 26% 0% 42% 29% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Creek Valley 7% 4% 56% 33% 0% 0% 0% Elementary Highlands Elementary 0% 0% 73% 27% 0% 0% 0% Normandale 0% 0% 66% 29% 5% 0% 0% Elementary South View Middle 13% 8% 69% 10% 0% 0% 0% School Valley View Middle 19% 4% 63% 12% 2% 0% 0% School Edina High School 3% 5% 1 24% 21% 42% 1 0% 3% Average 12% 3% 1 58% 20% 5% 1 0% 1% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. SaHe Kimley > > >Harn Improvement Program A -6 H E A L T H R E F O R M Question 7. How long does it normally take your child to get to /from school? Travel Time to School School < 5 minutes 5 -10 minutes 11 -20 minutes More than 20 minutes Don't know Concord Elementary 30% 41% 29% 0% 0% Cornelia Elementary 41% 26% 22% 0% 4% Countryside Elementary 29% 37% 16% 8% 3% Creek Valley Elementary 26% 41% 30% 4% 0% Highlands Elementary 9% 23% 64% 0% 5% Normandale Elementary 20% 20% 22% 37% 0% South View Middle School 23% 42% 33% 2% 0% Valley View Middle School 14% 37% 39% 7% 4% Edina High School 5% 39% 42% 11% 0% Average 22% 35% 32% 8% 1% . Percentages do not total 10016 because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. Travel Time From School School < 5 minutes 5 -10 minutes 11 -20 minutes More than 20 minutes Don't know Concord Elementary 29% 36% 30% 5% 0% Cornelia Elementary 26% 22% 30% 11% 4% Countryside Elementary 29% 32% 26% 5% 0% Creek Valley Elementary 26% 26% 37% 11% 0% Highlands Elementary 14% 18% 59% 5% 5% Normandale Elementary 20% 20% 22% 37% 0% South View Middle School 10% 46% 40% 4% 0% Valley View Middle School 7% 32% 51% 7% 4% Edina High School 8% 34% 42% 13% 0% Average 18% 31% 37% 10% 1% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. sta= mprovement �SH� III H E A L T H R E F O R M A -7 Kimley >>> Horn Question S. Has your child asked you for permission to walk or bike to /from school in the last year? School Yes No Concord Elementary 77% 23% Cornelia Elementary 56% 37% Countryside Elementary 53% 39% Creek Valley Elementary 74% 26% Highlands Elementary 36% 64% Normandale Elementary 34% 63% South View Middle School 79% 21% Valley View Middle School 56% 44% Edina High School 37% 61% Average 58% 40% Percentages do not total. 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. Question 9. At what grade would you allow your child to walk or bike to /from school without an adult? School PK K 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 7 8 9+ Concord Elementary 0% 1% 1% 0% 6% 35% 27% 14% 8% 5% 3% Cornelia Elementary 0% 0% 0% 4% 19% 15% 26% 7% 7% 4% 11% Countryside Elementary 0% 11% 5% 3% 16% 8% 18% 13% 5% 3% 11% Creek Valley Elementary 0% 0% 4% 11% 18% 26% 19% 11% 4% 0% 7% Highlands Elementary 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 14% 9% 14% 18% 4% 32% Normandale Elementary 0% 0% 0% 5% 8% 20% 23% 15% 10% 0% 20% South View Middle School 0% 2% 0% 2% 6% 17% 21% 21% 17% 12% 2% Valley View Middle School 0% 0% 2% 2% 3% 23% 14% 32% 2% 3% 19% Edina High School 3% 3% 0% 5% 11% 8% 13% 26% 11% 3% 16% Average 0% 2% 1 1% 3% 9% 20% 20% 18% 9% 4% 12% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. !rs:gjQ-t TTT7-, -8 Kimley*Horn ffV-P=. Orl _ A H E A L T H R E F O R M M a � a �, �'a�mx� -M x V 1 m�T D io 0 Percentages do not total 100% because respondents could select more than one issue. � A z O aM O p 0) o �. O G rr f* -h � s q M 3 N O A O 7 O M �y H C M N o� O M a O C a M HIS 0 O su O O .s w su O O C Before Speed of Amount Adults Sidewalks Safety of Weather Convenience or after- traffic of traffic to walk Crossing Violence School Distance Time or intersections or of Driving school along along or bike guards or crime pathways and crossings climate activities route route with Concord o 30 /0 a 3 /0 o 11 /0 0 17 /a 0 65 /0 0 76 /0 0 29 /0 0 52 /0 0 59 /0 0 14 /0 0 17 /0 0 27 /o Elementary Cornelia 33% 7% 4% 11% 37% 41% 22% 41% 33% 7% 22% 22% Elementary Countryside 24% 3% 8% 11% 37% 53% 21% 50% 39% 8% 18% 24% Elementary . Creek Valley 26% 4% 15% 22% 41% 41% 30% 52% 67% 15% 11% 41% Elementary Highlands 36% 0% 5% 14% 73% 82% 14% 68% 77% 5% 9% 18% Elementary Normandale 49% 7% 27% 20% 51% 54% 24% 51% 66% 10% 24% 32% Elementary South View o 35 /0 0 10 /0 0 31 /0 0 25 /0 0 40 /0 0 56 /o . 0 4 /0 0 44/0 0 67 /0 0 0 /0 0 19 /0 0 44/0 Middle Valley View 46% 4% 26% 28% 58% 60% 4% 53% 61% 5% 19% 37% Middle Edina High o 53 /0 0 13 /0 0 32 /0 0 24 /a 0 45 /0 0 45 /0 0 3 /0 0 39 /0 0 53 /0 0 13 /0 0 18 /0 0 37 /o School Average 37% 1 6% 19% 20% 51% 58% 16% 49% 58% 9% 18% 32% Percentages do not total 100% because respondents could select more than one issue. � A z O aM O p 0) o �. O G rr f* -h � s q M 3 N O A O 7 O M �y H C M N o� O M a O C a M HIS 0 O su O O .s w su O O C x m a a y�g a� �m xT� rn T 1� o � D 0 \v S Q �t Percentages for each issue do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided responses to this question. MA � o � O as F, CL O O 3 a 0 0 < r- M o Cr W Cr ,c A 14 O C A S _-V 01 a) Pr O a- x M PO 0 3 H A 7' O O S N O CT Convenience of Before or after- Speed of traffic Amount of traffic Distance Time Driving school activities along route along route School Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No I Maybe Yes No Maybe Concord 15% 11% 9% 6% 18% 9% 12% 14% 8% 11% 18% 8% 55% 5% 8% 59% 6% 8% Elementary Cornelia 15% 7% 15% 7% 11% 7% 0% 11% 15% 0% 7% 11% 15% 4% 19% 22% 4% 11% Elementary Countryside 18% 18% 5% 8% 21% 5% 13% 18% 5% 16% 18% 0% 42% 5% 3% 45% 5% 3% Elementary Creek Valley 30% 15% 11% 15% 15% 11% 22% 7% 15% " 26% 7% 15% 41% 7% 11% 44% 4% 11% Elementary Highlands 41% 5% 9% 14% 23% 9% 18% 18% 9% 14% 14% 18% 64% 5% 5% 68% 9% 5% Elementary Normandale 39% 15% 12% 12% 24% 15% 20% 24% 10% 22% 20% 12% 56% 10% 7% 61% 10% 5% Elementary South View 27% 4% 4% 10% 17% 2% 31% 6% 4% 15% 13% 2% 38% 4% 2% 38% 6% 2% Middle School Valley View 21% 16% 7% 5% 21% 5% 16% 23% 2% 14% 21% 5% 49% 12% 2% 49% 9% 4% Middle School Edina High 32% 16% 8% 16% 21% 8% 26% 16% 8% 26% 16% 3% 39% 13% 13% 37% 16% 8% School Average 125%112%1 9% 110%119% 8% 18%116%1 7% 16%116% 7% 45% 7% 1 7% 148%18%1 6% Percentages for each issue do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided responses to this question. MA � o � O as F, CL O O 3 a 0 0 < r- M o Cr W Cr ,c A 14 O C A S _-V 01 a) Pr O a- x M PO 0 3 H A 7' O O S N O CT x M D CO .4 ° S S m O D B' fD Note: Percentages for each issue do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided responses to this question. -0 p O c Q. M M '= O O M N n O s Z OQ o CL O 3 0 c0 fl. � CL 0 w 'd 0 Cr Di Cr 14 A 0 c n s CL d W 0 a' O F+ 0 O 3 v, O 0 IA Safety of Adults to walk or Sidewalks or Weather or intersections and Crossing guards Violence or crime bike with pathways climate crossings School Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes No Maybe Concord 36% 6% 3% 53% 8% 5% 62% 3% 5% 24% 9% 9% 20% 14% 9% 26% 9% 6% Elementary Cornelia 26% 4% 7% 30% 4% 11% 22% 4% 7% 11% 7% 7% 11% 11% 7% 7%.11% 7% Elementary Countryside 32% 8% 0% 42% 3% 8% 42% 8% 5% 21% 8% 5% 18% 11% 5% 16% 13% 11% Elementary Creek Valley 41% 7% 7% 48% 7% 11% 63% 0% 7% 37% 0% 7% 15% 7% 19% 41% 4% 11% Elementary Highlands o 27 /0 0 5 /0 0 9 /0 0 68/0 0 5 /0 0 5 /0 0 77 /0 0 0 /0 0 5 /0 0 27 /o 0 '9/0 0 5 /0 0 9 /0 0 9 /0 0 18 /0 0 14/0 0 9 /0 0 23 /o Elementary Normandale o 39 /0 0 12 /0 0 5 /0 0 63 /0 0 10 /0 0 2 /0 0 63 /0 0 10 /0 0 2 /0 0 39 /0 0 20 /0 0 5 /0 0 27 /0 0 17 /0 0 12 /0 0 15 /0 0 15 /0 0 20 /o Elementary South View 4% 21% 496' 42% 6% 0% 52% 4% 0% 19% 13% 0% 19% 15% 0% 17% 17% 2% Middle School Valley View o 5 /0 0 16 /0 0 7 /0 0 51 /0 0 9 /0 0 0% o 46/0 a 11 /0 o 0 /0 0 21 /0 0 16 /0 0 5 /0 0 9 /0 0 18 /0 0 5 /0 0 12 /0 0 16/0 0 5 /o Middle School Edina High o 8/0 0 24/0 0 8/0 0 47/0 0 11 /0 0 8/0 0 45 /0 0 13 /0 0 5 /0 0 21 /0 0 18 /0 0 11 /0 0 21 /0 0 21 /0 0 3 /0 0 24 /0 0 16/0 0 8 /o School Average 23%112%1 5% 49% 7% 59/6 52% 6% 4% 124%112%] 6% 17% 14% 8% 19% 13% 9% Note: Percentages for each issue do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided responses to this question. -0 p O c Q. M M '= O O M N n O s Z OQ o CL O 3 0 c0 fl. � CL 0 w 'd 0 Cr Di Cr 14 A 0 c n s CL d W 0 a' O F+ 0 O 3 v, O 0 IA Question 12. In your opinion, how much does your child's school encourage or discourage walking and biking to /from school? School Strongly Encourages Encourages Neither Discourages . Dscourages Concord Elementary 6% 38% 48% 3% 0% Cornelia Elementary 0% 15% 59% 4% 0% Countryside Elementary 5% 13% 53% 0% 3% Creek Valley Elementary 26% 59% 11% 0% 0% Highlands Elementary 18% 18% 59% 0% 0% Normandale Elementary 0% 7% 80% 2% 0% South View Middle School 4% 31% 52% 2% 4% Valley View Middle School 0% 5% 84% 7% 0% Edina High School 0% 3% 68% 11% 8% Average 5% 21% 59% 4% 2% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. Question 13. How much fun is walking or biking to /from school for your child? School Very Fun Fun Neutral Boring Very Boring Concord Elementary 38% 29% 14% 3% 2% Cornelia Elementary 22% 22% 7% 0% 0% Countryside Elementary 26% 21% 5% 5% 5% Creek Valley Elementary 41% 37% 15% 0% 0% Highlands Elementary 18% 27% 5% 0% 0% Normandale Elementary 22% 22% 7% 0% 5% South View Middle School 13% 42% 29% 0% 0% Valley View Middle School 7% 28% 35% 7% 5% Edina High School 3% 16% 32% 5% 8% Average 21% 27% 18% 3% 3% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. IrStatewideKimley )))Horn l-�Piog em I��� A -12 , H E A L T H R E F O R M Question 14. How healthy is walking or biking to /from school for your child? School Healthy Healthy Neutral Unhealthy r Unhealthy Concord Elementary 64% 26% 6% 0% 0% Cornelia Elementary 48% 19% 4% 0% 0% Countryside Elementary 47% 13% 8% 0% 0% Creek Valley Elementary 67% 22% 7% 0% 0% Highlands Elementary 59% 27% 5% 0% 5% Normandale Elementary 39% 39% 12% 0% 0% South View Middle School 48% 38% 4% 0% 2% Valley View Middle School 49% 32% 16% 0% 0% Edina High School 1 34% 26% 29% 0% 0% Average 1 51% 28% 10% 0% 1% Percentages do not total 100% because not all survey participants provided a response to this question. Question 15. What is the highest grade or year of school you completed? L�"�P1Oe►omR1e".IS�Y1� A -13 Kimley >>> Horn H E A L T H R E F O R M i Grades Grade 12 College College Graduate 9 -11 or GED 1 -3 year 4 years or School Prefer School Grades 1 -8 (Some (High (Some more (Master's not to (Elementary) High school college or (College degree or answer School) graduate) technical graduate) doctorate) school) Concord Elementary 0% 0% 2% 3% 42% 47% 2% Cornelia Elementary 0% 0% 0% 4% 52% 22% 0% Countryside 0% 0% 0% 3% 39% 32% 0% Elementary Creek Valley 4% 0% 0% 0% 67% 26% 0% Elementary Highlands 0% 0% 0% 0% 55% 41% 0% Elementary Normandale 0% 0% 0% 0% 46% 44% 0% Elementary South View Middle 2% 0% 0% 4% 40% 48% 0% School Valley View Middle 4% 0% 0% 5% 39% 42% 5% School Edina High School 3% 0% 0% 0% 32% 50% 5% Average 1% 0% 0% 2% 44% 41% 2% L�"�P1Oe►omR1e".IS�Y1� A -13 Kimley >>> Horn H E A L T H R E F O R M i Resources 1. National Center for Safe Routes to School, Ongoing Activities guide. saferoutesinfo .org /encouragement/Ongoing activities.cfm 2. Two Day Travel Tally, National Center for Safe Routes to School www.saferoutesinfo.org /program- tools /evaluation- student - class - travel -tally 3. Parent Survey, National Center for Safe Routes to School www.saferoutesinfo.org/program-tools/evaluation-parent-surveV 4. Minnesota Department of Transportation Safe Routes to School resources and funding opportunities www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/- 5. Minnesota Public Health Law Center legal and liability resources http • / /Publichealthlawcenter.org/ topics / active - living/ physical - activity- schools /resources 6. Examples of walking and biking curriculums for elementary and middle school students http• / /www dot. state. mn. us / saferoutes /toolkit. html /elementary- srts- curricuIum.pdf http• / /www dot state. mn. us /saferoutes /tooIkit.html/ middle - school - bicycle- education.pdf 7. Information and examples of pedestrian and bicycle safety campaigns http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /local rural /pedcampaign/ http• / /www bikesbelong.org/ resources /stats- and - research / research /bicycle - safety - campaign- review ISI-�� H E A L T H R E F O R M A -14 Kimley >) )Horn Public Health Law Center Liability Exposure for Schools Each school day presents new opportunities for students of all ages to practice healthy behaviors. Schools and school districts are improving student and community health through programs tailored to a community's individual needs and resources. Across Minnesota, school districts are updating their policies to include school wellness, Farm to School, Safe Routes to School programs, school gardens, and are entering into facilities use agreements to expand the recreational use of school property. Well- designed policies, led by knowledgeable and supportive staff, can advance student nutrition, increase physical activity, and help develop healthy lifestyles? While school districts are generally subject to liability for their wrongful acts as well the acts of their employees, fortunately, Minnesota law provides some significant protections. What is liability? For purposes of this publication, liability can be defined as legal responsibility for another person's injury or damages. There are numerous provisions within both state and federal law that serve as sources of potential liability for school districts. However, when a school district is considering allowing community use of its facilities for recreational activities, the possibility that someone who is using a school facility might suffer an injury and bring a claim against the district (or its officers, employees, or agents) is arguably the district's most significant liability concern. The standards for holding someone liable differ depending on who or what caused the injury. Typically, for a person to be held liable for someone else's injuries, an injured person must first prove that the accused had a legal responsibility to protect him or her from harm (otherwise known as "duty of care "). Concerns about "liability" can keep schools from implementing policies that would benefit students and community members alike. Public Health Law Center 875 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 www.publichealthlawcenter.org 651.290.7506 Then, the injured person has to show that the accused party failed to protect him or her (or "breached" the duty of care) and as 'a result, was injured in an expected (or' foreseeable ") manner.' The general expectation is that one will act reasonably toward others? What is considered reasonable, however, depends on the circumstances. Failure to act with as much care as an ordinary, reasonable person in a given situation would is considered negligence.' However, there are situations where a person or entity is held to a higher or lower standard. How are school districts protected from liability., Through governmental immunities. Immunities, provided both in state statutes4 and court decisions 5, protect school districts from liability for a variety of claims. Two immunities are particularly relevant when developing policies that promote healthy, active lifestyles. First, school districts are shielded from liability that might arise from discretionary conduct.' Statutory discretionary immunity protects policy- making decisions that require considering factors such as budget, education, resources and safety.' For example, a school district may adopt a policy stating that, due to limited resources and a desire to cultivate independence, students are responsible for getting on the correct bus at the end of the day.' Statutory discretionary immunity protects school districts from having their decisions "second - guessed "by the courts. Discretionary conduct is distinguished from operational -level or "ministerial" conduct. Operational activities that do not involve exercising of discretion, such as following an established plan, are not protected.' Second, school districts are generally protected from liability when injuries result from the recreational use of school property. Liability Exposure far. Schools 1 12 Local governments are generally immune from claims based on the construction, operation, or maintenance of any property owned or leased for park or recreational purposes.10 School districts are also protected against claims arising from the use of school property or school facilities that are made available for public recreational activities." Schools that fail to warn recreational users of known, hidden hazards may still be liable for injuries. 12 Are teachers, coaches and other school personnel protected as well? Yes, school personnel are generally protected as well. "Official immunity" protects individuals from personal liability for discretionary actions taken in the course of their official duties." This is intended to alleviate concerns that the fear of personal liability might deter independent action. 14 School districts are also generally required to defend and indemnify their employees if they are sued for something arising out of their employment. 15 However, school personnel are not protected for willful or malicious conduct,16 intentionally behaving in a way that is likely to cause harm to another person. Additionally, teachers may not be protected for failing to responsibly perform their regular duties. For example, a teacher who allows students to engage in dangerous play during recess may be liable if a child gets injured.'' Public Health Law Center 875 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 www.publichealthlawcenter.org 651.290.7506 Liability Exposure for Schools What steps can a school district take to reduce the risk of liability? There are a number of common sense precautions school districts can take to reduce their risk of liability. Some common risk management strategies include: • Creating clear policies that are based on a balancing of social, economic, financial and political factors. • Preserving a record of the decision - making process. • Training staff in regard to their roles in implementing policies. • Periodically reviewing policies and procedures, revising when necessary. • Eliminating known dangers where possible. • Documenting all precautions taken to avoid harm or risk. • Developing safety rules and handing them out to all students and parents. Rules should comply with any local rules, any local, state or federal laws, and any national standards. • Requiring parents or guardians of students to sign waivers before students participate in recreational activities.18 ■ Forming joint powers or facility use agreements with other public entities or community organizations that specifically outline acceptable uses of school property and facilities. ■ Obtaining liability insurance that covers lawsuits arising from injuries. Last updated: May 2013 ow00.4 Public Health Law Center AT WILLIAM MITCHELI (A)I.I.EM OF IAW The Publication was prepared by the Public Health Law Center at William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, funded by the CDC's Community Transformation Grant initiative and a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Active Living Research grant. ( #69554). The Public Health Law Center provides information and technical assistance on issues related to public health.'Ihe Public Health Law Center does not provide legal representation or advice.This document should not be considered legal advice. For specific legal questions, consult with an attorney. Public Health Law Center 875 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 www.publichealthlawcenter.org 651.290.7506 Liability Exposure for Schools Endnotes 1 Lubbers v. Anderson, 539 N.W.2d 398,401 (Minn. 1995). 2 See Flom v Flom, 291 N.W.2d 914, 916 (Minn. 1980); 4 Minn. Prac., Jury Instr. Guides - -Civil CIVJIG 25.10 (5th ed. 2010). 3 See Baker v Amtrak Nat. R.R. Passenger Corp., 588 N.W.2d 749, 753 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). 4 minn. stat. § 466.03 (2012) (local governments); minn. stat. § 3.736 (2012) (state entities). 5 "Common law" is developed through court decisions. 6 There are many protections available to schools and the distinctions between them can be difficult to understand. In an effort to simplify the topic of school liability, we have combined discussion of statutory discretionary immunity for municipalities as per minn. stat. § 466.03, subd. 3 (2012), with discussion of common law and vicarious common law official immunity. Individual situations should be reviewed by an attorney. 7 See J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v 287 Intermediate Dist., 761 N.W.2d 896, 902 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009) (including consider- ation of safety issues, financial burdens, and possible legal consequences in decision - making). 8 Pletan v Gaines, 494 N.W.2d 38,43-44 (Minn. 1992). 9 Holmquist v. State, 425 N.W.2d 230,232 (Minn. 1988). to minn. stat. § 466.03, subd. 6e (2012). 11 minn. stat. § 466.03, subd. 23 (2012). 12 Lishinski v City of Duluth, 634 N.W.2d 456,459-61 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). 13 Anderson v Anoka Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. 11, 678 N.W.2d 651, 660 (Minn. 2004). 14 Elwood v. Rice Cnty., 423 N.W.2d 671,678 (Minn. 1988). 15 minn. stat. § 466.07, subd. l (2012). 16 Gleason v Metro. Council Transit Operations, 582 N.W.2d 216,220 (Minn. 1998). 17 Fear v Indep. Sch. Dist. 911,634 N.W.2d 204,215-16 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). 1s While waivers are not a guarantee against liability, they may reduce the likelihood of being sued. For more informa- tion, please refer to the Public Health Law Center factsheet on Waivers and Releases, available at http://wwwpubli- chealthlawcenter.org /resources /minnes ota- recreational -use Public Health Law Center 875 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 www.publichealthlawcenter.org 651.290.7506 References 1 Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department. SHAPE 2010 Adult Data Book, Survey of the Health of All the Population and the Environment, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 2011. 2 Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department. SHAPE 2010 —Child Survey Data Book, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 2011. 3 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Barriers to Children Walking to or from School United States 2004, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, September 30, 2005. 4 Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT), Minnesota Department of Transportation. 5 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update 2008. http: / /edinamn.eov /index.php ?section= comprehensive plan 6 Edina Residential Survey, Decision Resources Ltd., 2013. Crosswalk Marking Field Visibility Study, FHWA, 2010. http: / /www.fhwa.dot.eov/ publications /research /safetv /pedbike /10067/ 8 An Empirical Bayesian Evaluation of the Safety Effects of High - Visibility School (Yellow) Crosswalks in San Francisco, Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants, 2009. www.westernite .ore /annualmeetings /sanfranl0 /Papers /Session %207 Papers /ITE %20Paper 7C Feldman Manzi.pdf Improvement lCLup- Kimley > >> Horn provement Program A -19 H E A L T H R E F O R M • CORPOPAT�O • lase To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. E From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action IK Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -63 Award Sale of $5,925,000 G.O. Utility Bonds Series 2014A Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -63 Awarding the Sale of $5,925,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2014A Information / Background: The $5,925,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A is to finance various water and storm water projects mostly as part of the street reconstruction projects. This bond is in accordance with the City's Utility Rate Study. The bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, June 17. The bids and Ehlers & Associates analysis will be presented to the City Council at the June 17 Council meeting. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2014 -63 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES I RELATING TO $5,925,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014A Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting field on June 17, 2014, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting including ,(pages): 1 through 19 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-63 RESOLUTION RELATING TO $5,925,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014A; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY WWM 9 a0 1 I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the obligations; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of August, 2014. Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that proposals had been received prior to [12:00 Noon], Central Time today for the purchase of the $5,925,000 General Obligation Utility. Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A of the City in accordance with the Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See attached] Councilmember then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -63 RESOLUTION RELATING TO $5,925,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014A; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. Authorization and Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Authorization. The City owns and operates a municipal storm sewer utility (the "Storm Water Utility ") and a municipal sanitary sewer and water utility (the "Sewer and Water Utility," which together with the Storm Water Utility is called the "Utilities "). This Council has heretofore ordered construction of improvements to the Utilities (the "Improvements "). This Council hereby determines to issue and sell $5,925,000 principal amount of General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, of the City (the "Bonds ") to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the Improvements, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, and [$53,325] representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56., 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, (__) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each proposal have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of , of , (the "Purchaser "), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and.directed to execute a contract on the. part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, to issue and sell the Bonds to pay the costs of the Improvements, and to pledge to the payment of the Bonds net revenues to be derived from charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities. The City presently has certain outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. Such obligations permit further pledges and appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities to be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation of net revenues of the Utilities to pay such obligations. The City Council hereby determines that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and such outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the. Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, ,to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed; it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. form: No. R- Section 2. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BOND, SERIES 2014A Interest Rate Maturi % February 1, REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. Date of Original Issue CUSIP July 8, 2014 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), acknowledges itself to be indebted and; for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above. Interest hereon is payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2015 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by'U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $5,925,000 (the "Bonds ") all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on June 17, 2014 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of financing the costs of improvements to the storm sewer utility and to the sanitary sewer and water utility of the City-and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of thez State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and Chapter 475. For the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the' City have been and ate hereby irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 2015 through 2022 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 2023 and thereafter are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot, on February 1, 2022 and on any date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. [INSERT REDEMPTION PROVISIONS FOR ANY TERM BONDS.] At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of the Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest.at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as.this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall -pay all principal of and interest oni this. Bond, and -shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee;in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and.laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make this Bond a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that in and by the Resolution, the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds net revenues of the storm water utility and sanitary sewer and water utility of the City; that in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed with the owner of the Bonds that it will impose and collect charges for the service, use and availability of its storm water utility and sanitary sewer and water utility at the time and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds and on all other bonds payable from net revenues of the storm water utility and sanitary sewer and water utility as such principal and interest respectively become due; that if needed to pay the principal and interest on this Bond, ad valorem taxes will be levied upon all taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by the manual signature one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused. this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager. CITY OF EDINA City Manager Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By . Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM — — as tenants UNIF TRANS MIN ACT....... Custodian ....... . in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT — — as tenants by under Uniform Transfers to Minors the entireties Act ...................... (State) JT TEN — — as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signatures) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in'the Securities Transfer Association Medalion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond. Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange. Act of 1934, as amended. [End of Bond Form] Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities Interest Rates Denominations Payment, Dating of Bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the .Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A." The Bonds shall be dated as of July 8, 2014, shall be issuable in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum set forth opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2015 $605,000 2020 $585,000 2016 565,000 2021 595,000 ..2017 565,000 2022 605,000 2018 570,000 2023 620,000 2019 580,000 2024 635,000 [REVISE FOR ANY TERM BONDS.] The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form, of single maturities. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond at the principal office of the Registrar described herein, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check'or draft issued by the Registrar. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2015, to the owners thereof as such appear of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not. such day is a business day. Interest on the Bonds will be computed on the basis of a 360 -d4y year consisting of twelve 30 -day months and will be rounded pursuant to the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Re ister. The Registrar shall keep at its principal office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for ,the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount, interest rate and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon'any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge- upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated Lost, 'Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the. Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, interest rate, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed; upon the - payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; arid, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon receipt by the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon.receipt by the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so - surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and "evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in -accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment: (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the'Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. (j) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Regis trar. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds. in its possession to .the successor Registrar. 3.05. Redemption.. (a) Bonds maturing in the years 2015 through 2022 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds maturing in 2023 and thereafter are each subject to redemption, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 2022 and on any date thereafter, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. [(b) Bonds maturing in the year shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption by lot at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the Bonds to be so redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption, on February 1, in the years and principal amounts set forth below: Year Amount *Final Maturity . In the event that any Bonds maturing in the year are redeemed pursuant to (a). above by the City and canceled by the Registrar and not reissued, the Bonds maturing in the year so redeemed and canceled may be applied by the City as a credit against the Bonds to be redeemed pursuant to this subsection (b), such credit to be equal to the principal amount of the Bonds maturing in the year so redeemed or canceled provided that the City has notified the Register not less than thirty-five (35) days prior to the redemption date of its election to apply such.Bonds as a credit.] (c) At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City shall cause notice of the call. for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to be unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the. City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on' such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authori zed representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be, signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and T delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 3.07. Use of Securities Depository, Book -Entry Only System. The provisions of this. Section shall tA& precedence over the provisions,of Sections 3.01 through 3.06 to the extent -they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") has agreed to act, as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book -Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it.holds the Bonds (the "DTC Participants "), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds. as reflected in their records (the `Beneficial Owners "). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 3.07, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC's nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon 'delivery. by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words "CEDE & CO." in this Order shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any; and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book -Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book -Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to 'do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance, with clause (f) or clause (g) below,' whichever. is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book -Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued,: except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book -Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter.shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 3.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository's rights under clause (e) above. Section 4...Secu * Provisions. 4.01. 2014 Utilities Construction Fund. There is hereby created a special bookkeeping fund to be designated as the "2014 Utilities Construction Fund" (the "Construction Fund "), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City appropriates to the Construction Fund the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements, including but not limited to the transfer to the Bond Fund, created in Section 4.02 hereof, of amounts, sufficient for the payment of interest, due upon the Bonds prior to the completion of the Improvements and the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements, any balance of the proceeds of Bonds remaining in the'Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in part, of any other improvements to the Utilities, as directed by the City Council, but any balance of such proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid to the Bond Fund. 4.02. 2014 Utilities Bond Fund. So long as. any of the Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain on its books and records a separate and special bookkeeping fund designated "2014 Utilities Bond Fund" (the "Bond Fund ") to be used for'no purpose other than -the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and any additional obligations of the City payable.therefrom pursuant to Section. 4.03 hereof. If the balance in the Bond Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on bonds payable therefrom, the City Finance Director shall nevertheless provide sufficient -money from any other f inds.of the City which are available for that purpose, and such other funds shall be reimbursed from subsequent receipts of net revenues of the Utilities appropriated to the Bond Fund and, if necessary; from the proceeds of the taxes levied for the Bond Fund. The City Finance Director shall deposit in the Bond. Fund the proceeds of all taxes levied and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of such bonds and interest, including the net revenues of the Utilities herein pledged and appropriated to the Bond Fund, all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Bonds, and all other moneys received for or appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon. There are hereby established two accounts in the Bond Fund, designated as the "Debt Service Account" and the "Surplus Account." All money appropriated or to be deposited in the Bond Fund shall . be deposited as received into the Debt, Service Account. On each February 1, the City Finance Director shall determine the amount on hand in the Debt Service Account. If such amount is in excess of one - twelfth of the debt service payable from the Bond Fund in the immediately preceding 12 months, the City Finance Director shall promptly transfer the amount in excess to the Surplus Account. The City appropriates to the Surplus Account any amounts to be transferred thereto -from the Debt Service Account as herein provided and all income derived from the investment of amounts on hand in the Surplus Account. If at any time the amount on hand in the Debt Service Account is insufficient to meet the requirements of the Bond Fund, the City Finance Director shall transfer to the Debt Service Account amounts on hand in the Surplus Account to the extent necessary to cure such deficiency. 4.03. Imposition of Charges; Additional Bonds. The City hereby covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that so long as any of the Bonds are outstanding, the City will impose and collect reasonable charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities to the City and its inhabitants according to schedules calculated to produce net revenues which,�will be sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Bonds and all other obligations payable. from the net revenues of the Utilities. Net revenues of the Utilities, to the extent necessary, are hereby, irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the principal of the Bonds and interest "thereon; provided that nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of net revenues of the Sewer and Water Utility or Storm Water Utility for the payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the City Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated.net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and paid therefrom and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of said net revenues may be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation herein made, as to the application. of net revenues received from time to time. 4.04. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds and any other obligations payable from the Bond Fund, as such principal and interest comes due. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient for the:payment of principal and interest then due, this City shall pay the principal and interest out of any fund of the City, and such other fund or funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient. money, is available to the Bond Fund. If on February 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the available net revenues of the Utilities on hand and estimated to be received or before the end of the following calendar year is not sufficient with any ad valorem taxes heretofore' levied in accordance with the provisions of this resolution, to pay when due all principal and interest become due on all Bonds payable therefrom in said following calendar year; or -the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.04, a direci,'irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in,an amount at least 5% in excess of amount needed to make good the deficiency. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this Section 5, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond which is due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, the City may nevertheless discharge its obligations with respect thereto by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for'the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time discharge its. obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable-at such; times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money Arbitrage, Official Statement and Fees. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and famish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the. legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits; including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with.the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permitito. be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the -interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue .'Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), and Regulations promulgated. thereunder (the Regulations), as such are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of d issue of the.Bonds; an covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under such Code and Regulations. The Improvements are public improvements available for use by members of the general public on a substantially equal basis.. The Improvements shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City will not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement; or other agreement ovcontract respecting the Improvements or security for the payment,of the Bonds which would cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 6.04. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 6.05. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of.the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 6.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated June 6, 2014, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven.business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directedto execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 7. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the Purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the Rule), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only obligated person in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. The City has complied in all material respects with any undertaking previously entered into. by it under the Rule. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, Owner or Bondowner means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any Beneficial Owner (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, Beneficial Owner means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (ii) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an.agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before twelve (12) months after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) to the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: "VALUATIONS— Current Property Valuations," "DEBT— Direct Debt" and " =Tax Levies and Collections" and "GENERAL INFORMATION —U.S. Census Data" and "- Employment / Unemployment Data," which information may be unaudited. Notwithstanding the foregoing "paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) through its Electronic Municipal Market Access System (EMMA) or to 'the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the MSRB. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information. can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be. provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events (each a Material Fact): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 -TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person; (1) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or. substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. As used herein, for those events that must be reported if material, an event is "material" if it is an event as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent "investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, an, event is also "material" if it is, an event that would be deemed material for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. For the purposes of the event identified in-(L) hereinabove, the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under `state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this section pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB through EMMA, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, the information described,in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB, from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so, long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of-the City under this section shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that; because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1.934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or. supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided' in' paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of'any Bonds, by a resolution of this Board filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City an d others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status. of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time,of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect; if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 8. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Attest: Adopted this 17th day of June, 2014. Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and upon vote being taken thereon, the following whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor which signature was attested by the City Clerk. COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION OF BONDS CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certify that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Edina, in said County, adopted June 17, 2014, awarding the sale, fixing the form and details and providing for the execution, delivery and security of $5,925,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, of the City, to be dated, as of July 8, 2014. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.62. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of , 2014. Hennepin County Auditor (SEAL) 4?� ow Le r� • CORPOR =`��9 • I8B6 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. F. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -64 Authorizing the Ground Lease & Lease Agreement Providing For Construction of the Edina Sports Dome, Braemar Outdoor Ice Rink and Lease by the City And Improvements to Braemar Arena and Pamela Park Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 764 Authorizing the Execution of a Ground Lease and a Lease Agreement providing for the, Construction of the Edina Sports Dome, Braemar Outdoor Ice Rink, and the Lease thereof by the City and Improvements to Braemar Arena and Pamela Park, and Approving the Form of a Resolution and an Official Statement Information / Background: The $16,360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 has two purposes: 1) $12,445 million is for the construction of a Sports Dome, a new Braemar Outdoor Ice Rink and Braemar refrigeration system improvements and 2) $3.2 million Pamela Park improvements to renovate fields, parking, trails and a reconstructed shelter building. Attached is the resolution authorizing the execution of a ground lease and a lease agreement providing for the construction of the above projects and the lease thereof by the City as drafted by the City's bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney. These agreements are similar to what has been done in the past with previous issues of Public Project Revenue Bonds including bonds to finance the building of Gymnasiums and a portion of the Public Works facility. The award of sale of the Public Project Revenue Bonds is a Housing and Redevelopment Authority Resolution and the authorization of the lease agreement is between the Housing Redevelopment Authority and the City. The form of the Ground Lease between the City of Edina and Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the Lease Agreement between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and City of Edina are included with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Item V. The bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, June 17. The bids and Ehlers & Associates analysis will be presented to the City Council at the June 17 Council meeting. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2014 -64 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th SL • Edina, MN 55424 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014 (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS) HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Municipality: City of Edina Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held. on June 17, 2014, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting, including: RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -64 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GROUND LEASE AND A LEASE AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EDINA SPORTS DOME, BRAEMAR OUTDOOR ICE RINK AND THE LEASE THEREOF BY THE CITY AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAMELA PARK, AND APPROVING THE FORM OF A RESOLUTION AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the bonds; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording on June _, 2014. City Clerk Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, which motion was seconded by Councilmember RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -64 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GROUND LEASE AND A LEASE AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EDINA SPORTS DOME, BRAEMAR OUTDOOR ICE RINK AND THE LEASE THEREOF BY THE CITY AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAMELA PARK, AND APPROVING THE FORM OF A RESOLUTION AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City'of Edina (the "City ") desires to provide adequate facilities for maintenance and public safety; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 465.71 and 471.64, the City is. authorized to enter into leases of real property, with an option to purchase, provided that the City retains the right to cancel said lease - purchase contract at the end of any fiscal year during its term; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said statutory authority, the City proposes to enter into a Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Lease "), with the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority "), as lessor, and the City, as lessee, pursuant to which the Authority will acquire, construct, remodel, renovate and furnish additional recreational facilities of the City consisting of a sports dome, outdoor refrigerated ice rink and improvements to Braemar Arena and Pamela Park (the "Facilities "), and the City will lease a portion of the Facilities from the Authority; and, WHEREAS, the Authority (a) authorized the sale of its $16,360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations) (the "Bonds "), to finance the cost of acquiring, remodeling, renovating and furnishing the Facilities and (b) proposes to adopt a resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds on June 17, 2014 (the "Bond Resolution "); WHEREAS, a form of the Lease and the Bond Resolution have been submitted to and reviewed by this Council; WHEREAS, a form of the Lease and the Bond Resolution have been submitted to and, along with the form of a proposed Ground Lease, to be dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Ground Lease "), between the City, as lessor, and the Authority, as lessee, pursuant to which the City will ground lease to the Authority the real estate upon which the portion of the Facilities subject to the Lease is located (as permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.035). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City hereby approves the form of the Lease and Ground Lease and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to execute, attest and deliver the Lease and Ground Lease on behalf of the City. All of the provisions of the Lease and Ground Lease, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Lease and Ground Lease shall be substantially in the form submitted to this Council with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as permitted or required, or as the Mayor, in his discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the Mayor shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the form of the Official Statement, relating to the Bonds (the "Official Statement "), a draft of which has been submitted to and received by this Council, and hereby ratifies and confirms its use and distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby approves the terms of the Bond Resolutions and the sale of the Bonds pursuant thereto, and approves the terms of the Bonds as set forth in said Bond Resolutions and the Indenture (as defined in the Bond Resolutions). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the Purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the Rule), .which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only obligated person in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. The City has complied in all material respects with any undertaking previously entered into by it under the Rule. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatevenaction at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, Owner or Bondowner means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any Beneficial Owner (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, Beneficial Owner means, in respect of a -2- Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly,-to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (ii) is treated as. the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before twelve (12) months after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) to the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: "VALUATIONS— Current Property Valuations," "DEBT— Direct Debt" and " —Tax Levies and Collections" and "GENERAL INFORMATION —U.S. Census Data" and "- Employment / Unemployment Data," which information may be unaudited. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official. statements, which have been submitted to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) through its Electronic Municipal Market Access System (EMMA) or to the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the MSRB. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have. materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, -3- however; if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and.the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure_ Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1) or subsection,(d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events (each a Material Fact): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 -TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. As used herein, for those events that must be reported if material, an event is "material" if it is an. event as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. IM Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, an event is also "material" if it is an event that would be deemed material for,purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. For the purposes of the event identified .in (L) hereinabove, the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over-substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and .orders `of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court"or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this section pursuant,to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB through EMMA, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The, covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations -5- of the City under this section shall terminate and be.without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Board filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this resolution shall be in.full force and effect from and after its passage and that a certified copy hereof be provided to the Authority. W Adopted this 17th day of June, 2014. Attest: City Clerk Mayor Upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -7- To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M VIII. G. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Second Reading: Ordinance 2014 -8 Concerning On -Sale Liquor Licenses with Amusement Devices in PCD -3 Zoning District Action Requested: Grant second reading and approve Ordinance 2014 -8. Information / Background: Simon Properties, the owner of Southdale Center has investigated several concepts to reoccupy the mostly vacant third floor space at the mall. There is strong interest to extensively remodel much of that level to accommodate a new destination restaurant. Edina's City Code, however, currently prohibits the type of business that the property owner believes will be most successful in this location. Dave and Busters has strong .interest in locating at the renovated Southdale Center. Dave and Busters is a national restaurant group that combines dining and entertainment. They feature a full- service lunch and dinner menu, a full bar and amusement games. They do not offer gambling or games of chance. An overview of Dave and Busters' business model and summary of their proposed location at Southdale Center was presented and discussed at the June 3, 2014 City Council meeting. During the first reading, individual Council members identified four concerns with the proposed Ordinance change: (1) proximity-to residential buildings, (2) policy regarding under -21 customers, (3) inclusion of alcoholic, beverages in menu, and (4) sale of alcoholic beverages in a "beer tube ". Staff has discussed each of these concerns with Dave and Busters representatives. They have submitted a letter that responds to the identified concerns. The proposed Ordinance is amended to address the proximity of a licensed premise to residential buildings. A minimum distance of 500 feet is recommended to be included in Section 4- 34(g)(6). This is based on an evaluation of existing residential buildings in or near the PCD -3 Zoning District as summarized below. Location in PCD -3 District !nT)T� Yorktown Mall, Panera Bread, Joann Fabric, etc. 133 feet Galleria Edina, Barnes & Noble, Westin condominiums 150 feet Centennial Shoppes, Pinstripes rn ft-N r) rr 1 1 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M VIII. G. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Second Reading: Ordinance 2014 -8 Concerning On -Sale Liquor Licenses with Amusement Devices in PCD -3 Zoning District Action Requested: Grant second reading and approve Ordinance 2014 -8. Information / Background: Simon Properties, the owner of Southdale Center has investigated several concepts to reoccupy the mostly vacant third floor space at the mall. There is strong interest to extensively remodel much of that level to accommodate a new destination restaurant. Edina's City Code, however, currently prohibits the type of business that the property owner believes will be most successful in this location. Dave and Busters has strong .interest in locating at the renovated Southdale Center. Dave and Busters is a national restaurant group that combines dining and entertainment. They feature a full- service lunch and dinner menu, a full bar and amusement games. They do not offer gambling or games of chance. An overview of Dave and Busters' business model and summary of their proposed location at Southdale Center was presented and discussed at the June 3, 2014 City Council meeting. During the first reading, individual Council members identified four concerns with the proposed Ordinance change: (1) proximity-to residential buildings, (2) policy regarding under -21 customers, (3) inclusion of alcoholic, beverages in menu, and (4) sale of alcoholic beverages in a "beer tube ". Staff has discussed each of these concerns with Dave and Busters representatives. They have submitted a letter that responds to the identified concerns. The proposed Ordinance is amended to address the proximity of a licensed premise to residential buildings. A minimum distance of 500 feet is recommended to be included in Section 4- 34(g)(6). This is based on an evaluation of existing residential buildings in or near the PCD -3 Zoning District as summarized below. Location in PCD -3 District Distance Yorktown Mall, Panera Bread, Joann Fabric, etc. 133 feet Galleria Edina, Barnes & Noble, Westin condominiums 150 feet Centennial Shoppes, Pinstripes 261 feet Galleria Edina Crate& Barrel, Westin condominiums 767 feet Southdale Center, other outlots 775 feet Southdale Center, One Southdale Place 850 feet City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 St. • Edina, MN 55424 Staff recommends that the City Council amend the. City Code to allow the issuance of full- service liquor licenses with restaurants that also offer amusement games of skill. This recommendation is based on the following points about this type of business located at a multi- tenant, multi -use regional shopping destination like Southdale Center: • Appeals to wide variety of customers: couples, singles, family, and friends • appeals to a younger demographic that is currently underserved in the Southdale market • is a destination that will serve local residents and draw customers from the metro area • likely to create synergy with other businesses in and near Southdale Center • will create new job opportunities • will provide another multi- million dollar business investment in Edina • will provide new option for corporate events and community special events Proposed amendments to the City Code are attached for consideration by the Council. If approved, these changes would allow .this type of businesses in a limited number of sites in the greater Southdale area. Additionally, the.City has the right to review the business practices related to the alcohol service. Penalties could be assessed or the license suspended or revoked if there are violations of the City liquor ordinance or other applicable provisions of the City Code. Attachments: PCD -3 Zoning Map with potential locations highlighted Memo from Dave and Busters dated June 12, 2014 Proposed Ordinance No. 2014 -8 with June 3 amendments SOUTH DALE o� CENTER � -� SIMON r A l L 5 � s f � - 1 i — Gaflet* W-1 t � � v This page intentionally left blank. June 12, 2014 Edina City Council Members and Mayor 4801 W. 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Council Members and Mayor: Thank you for the opportunity to present Dave & Buster's to the City of Edina on June 3'd. Asa follow up to some of the Council Member's questions raised about Dave & Buster's operations, we have given each item full consideration and would like to respond prior to next Tuesday's meeting with the following: 1) Placement of beveraie selections in the front of the Menu; Our menu is consistent with other national casual dining brands, including Chili's, Applebee's, Cheesecake Factory, TGI Friday's, and Ruby Tuesday's. Within the casual dining and entertainment industries, it is common to place the beverage offerings at the front of the menu and to showcase Food and Beverage both in words and through photography. As discussed previously, our breakdown between Food and Beverage offerings is noted below: Nationwide: • Food 70% • Alcohol 30% Maple Grove: • Food 71% • Alcohol 29% We believe our beverage percentage is at or below industry average. 2) Beer Containers: We sell beer by the glass or in larger containers that offer 50 oz. and 100 oz. These are offered as "Beer Tubes ".. They are comparable to pitchers that are offered at other competitive restaurants. Our policy requires that at least two .(2) guests over the age of 21 must be present to order a 50 oz. container. This is the equivalent of 2 pints of beer per person. Our policy for the 100 oz. containers requires that at least four (4) guests over the age of 21 must be present. This is also the equivalent of 2 pints of beers per person. These offerings are consistent with the sizes of pitchers or other containers offered by 'other restaurants. If an underage guest.accompanie.s a group and the group purchases a beer container, in accordance with our house polities and alcohol service procedures; the underage guest is monitored by our staff, including servers, Captains (during peak hours) and other front of the house employees. In addition, the underage guest is not provided a glass for the beer. 3) Percentage of "Family" Guests: While we do not track all guests in our locations; we do have information of guests that participate in our Guest Pulse Program. These are guests that opt -in to complete a survey about their overall experience and demographic information is captured each time. Here is a demographic breakdown from the data in the Guest Pulse Program: Guests �vith_Children: We believe the guests with children under the age of 20 are generally visiting as a family unit. System -wide this represents about 30% of our guests, but it is higher in Maple Grove at about 42 %. Based on the demographic and retail nature of the Edina market, we would anticipate similar results in our proposed location. In addition to being a popular family destination, Dave & Buster's customizes Special Events for the under 21 guests. Examples of such events are as follows: • After -Prom Gatherings • After - Graduation Celebrations • Lock -Ins • Other school or Community Events • Birthday Parties • Bat Mitzvah/Bar Mitzvah Our expectation to attract families and guests under 21 make it important for Dave & Buster's to maintain standard operating hours and procedures. If we imposed a policy that requires minors to leave by a certain hour, we believe the location becomes less attractive to families and creates a perception of a more bar -like destination. In addition, the restriction would eliminate the above - referenced Special Events, which would be a disservice to the Edina community. 4) Operating Policies: As discussed during our June 3rd Meeting, we feel our house policies and operating procedures exceed industry standard. A summary of our policies and procedures are set forth below: • All service employees to be ServSafe Certified within 30 days of employment, which is a National Restaurant Association program; • All front of the house positions, i.e. Winner Circle clerk, Technicians and Hosts, completes the ServSafe.Training Course with a ServSafe Certified Instructor and takes an in =house test. As a rule in addition to service staff and managers, we use Captains, Security and other front of the house staff members to assist in monitoring consumption throughout the building; • Managers must be ServSafe Instructor Certified and are required to complete an in -house manager training course, and employees in a leadership role, such as class trainers, must be ServSafe Instructor Certified; • We enforce a one ID / One drink policy to prevent passing of drinks; 12 or under 13 to 20 21 to 35 35 +. National Average _153%0 14.1 % 50.2% 20.5% Maple Grove 25.4% 16.8% 42.8 % 14.9 % We believe the guests with children under the age of 20 are generally visiting as a family unit. System -wide this represents about 30% of our guests, but it is higher in Maple Grove at about 42 %. Based on the demographic and retail nature of the Edina market, we would anticipate similar results in our proposed location. In addition to being a popular family destination, Dave & Buster's customizes Special Events for the under 21 guests. Examples of such events are as follows: • After -Prom Gatherings • After - Graduation Celebrations • Lock -Ins • Other school or Community Events • Birthday Parties • Bat Mitzvah/Bar Mitzvah Our expectation to attract families and guests under 21 make it important for Dave & Buster's to maintain standard operating hours and procedures. If we imposed a policy that requires minors to leave by a certain hour, we believe the location becomes less attractive to families and creates a perception of a more bar -like destination. In addition, the restriction would eliminate the above - referenced Special Events, which would be a disservice to the Edina community. 4) Operating Policies: As discussed during our June 3rd Meeting, we feel our house policies and operating procedures exceed industry standard. A summary of our policies and procedures are set forth below: • All service employees to be ServSafe Certified within 30 days of employment, which is a National Restaurant Association program; • All front of the house positions, i.e. Winner Circle clerk, Technicians and Hosts, completes the ServSafe.Training Course with a ServSafe Certified Instructor and takes an in =house test. As a rule in addition to service staff and managers, we use Captains, Security and other front of the house staff members to assist in monitoring consumption throughout the building; • Managers must be ServSafe Instructor Certified and are required to complete an in -house manager training course, and employees in a leadership role, such as class trainers, must be ServSafe Instructor Certified; • We enforce a one ID / One drink policy to prevent passing of drinks; • Guardian Policy - All under the age of 18 must be accompanied by a guardian at least 25 years or older. Six minors to one adult limit. Minors are not allowed to 'roam' freely in the building. The Guardian must accompany minors into and throughout the Midway, which avoids parents in the dining room and minors unaccompanied elsewhere in the building. We feel this policy is 'a good match for this mall location; and • D &B uses the BARS Program, which consists of two compliance checks per month per store on . an anonymous basis to verify the ID checks, in accordance with our policy (ID if under 30). This program is often referred to as a "Secret Shopper Program." If the employee. requests the ID during the compliance check, the employee receives a Green Card. If the'employee fails to request the ID during the compliance check, the employee receives a Red Card.. When an employee receives a Red Card, the manager is notified and the employee receives a written warning. If an employee receives two (2) Red Cards in a two (2) year period, he or she is automatically terminated. From Year 2013; on average D &B stores received 94% Green. Cards and 6% Red Cards. For Year 2013, Maple Grove received 100% Green Cards. We look forward to meeting with you on June 17'h. Thank you so much for your consideration. Sincerely, Lisa Warren incerely, _ Jill achovic This page intentionally left blank. ORDINANCE NO. 20:14 -8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 4 AND 6 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND AMUSEMENT DEVICES THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 4 -34, subsection (e) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (e) On -sale intoxicating liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, no on -sale intoxicating liquor license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3, POD -2 subdistricts or the mixed development district as established by chapter 36.; i:K T (2) Miniature peel tables, bewling machines, shuffle beards, electric r-ifle eF gUR ranges, and machines patteFned afteF baseball, basketball, heekey and SuFn Section 2. Section 4 -34 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding subsection (g) to read as follows: (g) In addition, no on -sale intoxicating liquor license shall be granted to any establishment that has amusement devices, except to a restaurant in the PCD -3 subdistrict subject to the following: (1) The licensed premises shall be least 30,000 square feet in gross floor area. (2) The licensed premises shall be located on a site that provides at least 250,000 square feet in total building area, including primary buildings and an'y outlot building. Ordinance 2014 -8 Page 2 (3) Not more than 40 percent (40 %) of the gross floor area of the licensed premises shall be used for operation of amusement devices regulated by this section. (4) The licensed premises shall contain at least 200 seats and .provide a full food menu during all hours that it is open to the general public. (5) All regulated amusement devices shall be licensed in accordance with Section 6 -92 and shall be located on the interior of the premises. Section 3. Sections 6 -91, 6 -100 and 6 -101 of the Edina City Code'are amended to read as follows: Section 6 -91. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Machine or amusement device means any machine, contrivance or device, including, without limitation, video, electronic or mechanical, of any of the following types: (1) A machine which upon the insertion of a coin, slug or other token, or upon payment of a fee, operates, or may.be operated, as a game, contest or other amusement only and which contains no automatic payoff device for the return of money, coins, merchandise, checks, tokens or any other thing or item of value; provided, however, that such machine may be equipped to permit a free play or game or allow the payoffs provided in Sections 6 -100 and 6 -10'1. (2) Miniature pool tables, bowling machines, shuffle boards, electric rifle or gun ranges, and machines patterned after baseball, basketball, hockey and similar games and like machines which may be played solely for amusement and not as gambling devices, and which machines are played by the insertion of a coin, slug or other token, or upon payment of a fee and which may ,be equipped to permit a free play or game` or allow the payoff§ provided in Sections 6 -100 and 6 -101. Ordinance 2014 -8 Page 3 (3) Amusement devices designated for and used exclusively by children, such as, but not limited to, kiddie cars, miniature airplane rides, mechanical horses, and other miniature mechanical devices, not operated as a part of or in connection with any carnival, circus, show or other entertainment or exhibition. Sec. 6 -100. Payoff. It shall be unlawful for the licensee, or for the owner, lessee or operator of the establishment where such machine is located, to give any money, prize or reward ten (10) times the cost to play or operate the machine a- single time, but not to exceed ten dollars . ($1.0.00). token, reward or- PFize in Reu ef fFee games r-egistered te such Fn�ehine, and a" free games 1 shall be played en the Fnaehine r-egistering such free gaMe, wid there games. Sec. 6-1.01. Automatic payoff. No person shall keep, maintain, sell or permit to be operated any machine which has been converted into an automatic payoff device which shall discharge coins, checks. or other tokens to the operator or player of such machine. No person shall convert any machine into an automatic payoff device. Provided, however, machines which,. based `on . the skill of the player. discharge FneRey, -= ei =!cam tickets, tokens, merchandise or any other thing of value which has a wholesale value no greater than, ten (10)' times the cost to play or operate the machine a single time, but not to exceed ten dollars ($10.00) may be kept, maintained or operated subject . to the provisions of this article. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: June 3, 2014 Second Reading: June 17, 2014 Published: June 26, 2014 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor ail T\ T T /1 T T / T T !1 !1 1 ! 1 ! T l T T\ ♦ TT /\ 1 T npw,40' O CopPOitp'��O • - 1888 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL, Agenda Item #: VIII. H. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -66 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with: State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -66' City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-66 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Park & Recreation Department: Macy's Southdale Store 616.76 Edina Public Works Department: Karol Emmerich 100 Clumps of Daylilies Dated: June 17, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Accessible Raised Beds /Demonstration Rain Garden, Yorktown Park Community Garden City of Edina Flower Beds James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. • ��CORPORA'CEO • �ese Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action EK Discussion ❑ Information ❑ * ICI 1553 9401 go 1 H N 533 Etmt ie -- INS I&e.6aTsk, In 3-olA -3mok6s - beiver T 'FIV k vmv �o gv� -ev, Mdde • �� -was aL WN w,te (-h Soil Ifot .►)4-o AA�A tg of MIA v - v+it5l�s Ica- f�touSaAd t om .- tt�av►t�5,.j�,,` ut ✓tom (ItH ) �V-tL- s• AA � I 0 l �rOe, fb� � Heather Braniain From: Marie Sullivan <mariesu11ivan87 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 20142:05 PM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); Edina Mail; Josh Sprague; Cary Teague; Scott Neal Subject: Fwd: airline traffic noise ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87@=ail.com> Date: Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:53 PM Subject: airline traffic noise To: Joni Bennett <jonibennett12@comcast.net>, ann Swenson <swensonannl@gmail.com> Dear Council Members, I feel uncomfortable about how my comments at the Concord Neighborhood meeting might have been received. I. belong to a book club with some good friends who live on 6oth street just east of Hwy. loo and believe me, .I would not wish the proposed air traffic lanes on anyone! Least of all my friends! But I cannot help but feel afraid that my neck of the woods is not as strongly protected by a concerned citizens organization. I feel frustrated that so often an organized group can sway decisions to benefit their interests. This frustrates me because I feel that I happen to live in a neighborhood that has issues not being addressed proactively enough because we are not well organized and do not seem to have enough residents with the time, inclination, or skills needed to have a mature, well- rounded, sensible, fair - minded, effective association. I worry that a neighborhood without good organization might be the loser when it comes to undesirable changes. I'm afraid when decisions are made that have negative affects, organizations might tend to infuse the undesirable situations on places of least resistance. This is why I am concerned about how to help my southeastern part of the city deal with the horrible air traffic noise we already have! I just want to make sure we are equally looked out for and represented in this situation. I have lived here for 18 years now and before that we were on Concord Terrace for 8 years. What's been hard is seeing Cornelia lose it's edge in being able to offer a stronger curriculum as well as the airport noise increase as well as losing the Fred. I'm sorry if my emotions got the best of me and I got defensive. Part of the reason is that in addition to being nervous about negative impact of the Fred replacement plan, I am frustrated with the fallout of the recent road construction on my street. The curbs look ugly because some were replaced with new white cement and the segmented look is not good. I can't help but wonder if the curbs were allowed to look this way in the other Edina neighborhoods. Also, I have a crack in my siding as well as cracks in my basement and driveway that were not there before the heavy equipment went up and down my street. My house rumbled quite severely during the movement of the heavy machinery and I know these cracks are a result of that. I hate sounding like a crab but also my lawn is as hard as cement and in bad condition where they dug it up. The hydro - seeding did not work well and it's frustrating for me because I have two neighbors, one of whom ( in corporate real estate),did not allow the city to touch her lawn and she put in sod which now looks great, and my other neighbor made the city down a better quality soil than was put on my lawn and he (a lawyer ) made the workers come back repeatedly to fiddle with his lawn and now his looks good too. So, I'm sorry to sound like a whiner, but I tried to be a good, fiscally responsible citizen:and give the city's way a chance but my lawn is much worse than it was before it was torn up and well, I'm not sure what to do about it. I hope Councilman Sprague forwarded you my email to him stating why I think it's important how we use the Fred land'in the future. I feel strongly against athletic field or pedestrian lighting, I feel strongly we need to preserve the quiet environment the Fred provided, and that we should keep it natural in wildlife and less like Centennial Lakes, with a bike trail that is far from home owners and allows enough privacy for homeowners. Thank you for listening and know that though it's been a tough year for my neighborhood, I do value what is best for'everyone. I really do appreciate all that you do. Sincerely, Marie S. Heather Braniain From: Ken Potts <potts003 @.gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 04,2014 11:59 AM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Lee; arlenef @aol.com; claudiaj.carr@yahoo.com; joannolson @lsadesigninc.com; Kevin Staunton; Michael Platteter, michael.schroeder@Ihbcorp.com; Richard & Nancy Scherer, Edina Mail; Heather Beal; jhovland @krausehovland.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Re: Immediate action needed Scott,. The problems lie.within the group of regulatory staff and the current processes. Too many of them have allowed themselves to be influenced by the builders, or they are too overloaded to be effective. When it comes to reporting to you, I'm have no doubt they assure you that "it is under control;" "we have the situation in hand;" "these complaints are based on the current conditions, not what the final condition will be." It is crystal clear, based on many documented examples from sites all over Edina, that the regulatory system has broken down. It starts with the initial site plan submission and continues through the inspections process. There are unscrupulous homebuilders who realize this and exploit it without fear of penalty. a -. Ken, On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Scott Neal <sneal@edinamn.g_ov> wrote: Ken - I am meeting with regulatory staff on the status of the redevelopment project. I will respond to you when we have generated a comprehensive update. Scott On May 31, 2014, at 9:55 AM, "Ken Potts" <potts003@,gmail. com <mailto:potts003@gmail.com>> wrote:' All, It has been a year now since the demolition began at 4238 Crocker Ave. Recent rain continues to prove that REFINED is incapable of managing the run -off during construction AND that the City of Edina has, so far, failed in its regulatory oversight. If REFINED has actually created the escrow of $2500. it is time to draw against that to hire a third party finish the work in a code compliant manner AND protect my property from the ongoing damage. For those of you who may not be close to this project, the most recent insult to the City process is REFINED's installation of roof drainage that directly contradicts the directions on the site plan. Rather than drain roof water to the storm sewer extension (installed explicitly for that purpose) downspouts are directing water due north toward my property. I should not have to spend my time and money to protect my property. I have heard many on Council say that City practices should not pit neighbors against each other, nor should they cause damage to adjacent property. It is time for the City to stop talking about this and TAKE ACTION. A stop work order should be issued immediately, red - tagged first thing Monday morning, and the escrow drawn down upon to pay a different contractor to properly finish the work. There is no reason to delay this action any longer. Scott-as City Manager, you ultimately oversee the processes here. I would appreciate your response and description of the schedule for these actions. rhttps:Hmail.gooizle.com/mail/u/O/images/cleardot.a 1 1 Heather Branigin From: Jeri Dentz <jdentz @me.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 9:50 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Grandview Development Dear city council members, Please heed the advice of the city manager, the appointed advisory bodiesland the views of the citizens of Edina by exploring various options to keep the land at Eden Avenue available for public and community use, not commercial development. Please explore various options that include open community areas. Edina citizens want more open spaces and less commercial and industrial''- areas. Please help this community become more walker and bike - friendly. It seems that this entire project is being decided on the opinions of three council members, and they are not taking into account the various surveys and expressed opinions of the majority of Edina citizens. Perhaps the next elections will show them that they are Edina representatives that should, listen to the wishes of it's citizens. Jeri Dentz Edina Resident. Heather Branigin From: Jackie Prince <j,m.prince @earthlink net> . Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 201411:38 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Youth Housing - "66 West" - Beacon Dear Council members, I'd like to comment on the sketch plan review for the TCF building on 66th Street that took place at your last meeting. I appreciate that the Council has a fiduciary, if you will, responsibility to the city, and I appreciate, too, that long range development plans are wise, so I understand the hesitation to amend the Comp Plan for the area. I do hope, though, that when the Council considers "highest and best use" for the TCF building, you think in terms broader than strictly economic. The health facilities (as wel[as Southdale) will need the workers that will live in "66 West": the young people will want to build their resumes with jobs as cafeteria workers, cleaners, and other beginning jobs. As they increase their education, they may stay on as aides, nurses and other professionals while moving on other housing. Another advantage to using the TCF building in this way is that it will not add to traffic congestion. The large developments at Southdale, Byerlys, and that planned for the furniture store property north of Cub Foods frankly have my neighbors here at York Plaza (7200 York) very concerned about increased traffic. Few, if any, of the young adults at "66 West" will own cars: they will use public transportation or walk to school and work. Finally, I cannot conceive of any use higher or better than to,give our young.people a fair chance at a propitious start to their lives. The TCF building is the perfect•location for this type of youth housing specifically because it is close to jobs and transport ation. And these are OUR young people: they have grown up in Edina, Richfield and Bloomington. They have potential: they have been smart enough to leave abusive situations, resilient enough to survive a childhood in multiple foster care homes or other challenges; clever enough to survive on the street; determined enough to stay in school. while dealing with homelessness. Let's do the right thing for our children and make a smart investment for the Southdale area at the same time. I believe it's a win -win situation for everyone. Sincerely, Jackie Prince P.S. I'm a long -term supporter of Beacon and I know the high quality of their developments. If any of you have not toured Nicollet Square - the model for the TCF building project - and would like to, I'd be happy to help arrange a visit for you. Richfield United Methodist Church Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 W. 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 The Honorable Mayor.lim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council, On behalf of Richfield United Methodist Church we write in support of the development at 3330 West 66th Street. Having looked into the issue of homeless youth in the metro, we feel strongly that providing safe and appropriate housing four young adults and youth is a critical need. Richfield UMC has active members who live in Richfield, Edina, South Minneapolis and numerous .suburbs in the Southwest metro area. We have long been engaged injustice issues on behalf of'those in need. We were one of the original twelve congregations who came together to create Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People. Richfield has been in partnership with Beacon for some time now, and we feel blessed to be in community with Edina Community Church and other faith communities.who are committed to the creation of communities in which all people have access to the most basic of human needs. Surely our youth and young adults need safe and affordable places in which to live and create a future. We ask that you support the project and write to let you know that we stand as community partners with you as you move into this exciting and innovative project to enhance the lives of young people in our area. Thank you for your support. iSinely, Rev. Elizabeth Macaulay Lead Pastor Sue Restemayer, Administrative Council Chair Pastor: Elizabeth Macaulay 5835 Lyndale Ave. South • Minneapolis, MN 55419 Phone: (612) 861 -6086. • Fax: (612) 861 -6332 E -mail: RUMC@richfieldumc.ora Heather Branigin From: Stacey Thiele <SThiele @SoundCapital.com> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 201410:12 PM To: Stacey Thiele Cc: Johan Rosenberg Subject: Repurpose the Fred - Come Ride with Us...... Attachments: We Can Ride In Edina Presentation (6 -5 -2014) Final.pdf Dear Friends: Please see attached a proposal to re- purpose the Fred Richards Golf Course into a state of the art municipal owned equestrian riding center. This proposal will be presented at the first public meeting next week. The first public meeting will take place on Thursday. June 12, 2014 at 7 p.m. at the Edina Public Works Building, 7450 Metro Blvd., Edina, MN 55439. The June 12 meeting is open to the public. All Edina residents are invited and welcome to attend. This is the time to evaluate various proposals for 43 acres of beautiful land. Please, come and learn what we can offer the community. Show your support by picking up a Horse on a Stick at the entrance at 6:30 PM. Please pass the word along and feel free to contact me with any questions. Thanks. Stacey www.wecanrideinedina.org A t �r + ni. - ... Wlb�scys.avc ro Ai _.i f i' i k� 4t 7�YJ7'6i Zm . .:... a tx:7 -ux ..... ..., �,.i —v•= 2`...`� 4` c. �uiiLn �A.a cmlx VA-9;- 9 I NM III r k� III roll ILLI��r 1 r' �tyy1 mm r r N I'..I lr JI A -]� n f� YI I II IV t1411�i _ NNN r 11 I 1 I- I IS "����aaaaS�I 7 .,�ryrygg RE, I. 2 1l t o w YY y ; of v:3 J r ...I ,� f + 111'G �E = r. I - F Jf <WL O�Y a In +i S S +rk�I�e kb uz A2 i!. Ld ' Y��II b�rq r t k'a• If 1 I,I .. s +J'w II '.if 111 r�. LI,I II I� f ? ri ItyP1Z A. -I 4111 r I ��.nR F R 3'W is [' E F _. ..M M1� 2'I 'jdNEl:2 4AJ^ flawMlh I� P1iCtfi — _ w MJ Proposal to repurpose the Fred Richards Golf Course in to a state of the art equestrian riding center. EDELWEISS EQLIESTR.IAN CENTER OF EDINA WE CAN RIDE DARE TO JUMP Help Edina develop a... A unique asset that sets Edina apart from all other communities A place where we can ride A place where we can volunteer A place we can reconnect An award winning park An economic development with a positive cash flow WE CAN RIDE ZAAS Rim 9V J�y.rq� ' t 3 r S A beautiful, clean, well manicured green space. A walking trail like no other Minnesota City A pavilion picnic area in the heart of the park with spectacular views A serene and respectful park considerate of the northern residences A place for children to learn and gain confidence through horsemanship A place to benefit the underserved in the community A place that sets Edina apart as a unique place to live, work and play. 1982 - ' �; WE CAN RIDE Vision —An accessible, enjoyable, and environmentally sound facility promoting good stewardship to individuals and animals through a feeling of community and ownership. Mission — Reach out, introduce, and educate individuals to the equine world while providing optimum care for our horses and maintaining a sound environmental facility. To improve the lives of individuals with disabilities or special needs through equine assisted activities. Values • Stewardship — Look out for our horses, our friends, and surroundings by observing the golden rule. • Integrity — Objectivity and honesty are the best policies. • Excellence — Do our best in everything we take on. • Diversity — Support everyone and provide opportunities and learning experiences accordingly. • Education — There is always something to learn • Safety — Safety first — ALWAYS. Fun and learning then come second hand in hand. • Teamwork — Always work together as a team — what are we here for if not to help one another. Riding Lessons — A new, exciting recreational sport for the children of Edina to learn and grow through. + Horsemanship teaches new skills and responsibilities that extend beyond the stables. Therapeutic Riding — We Can Ride, an independent non - profit, offers therapeutic riding programs for people of all ages and abilities. Equine Event Venue — EEC will be designed to attract local and regional non - racing equine competitions and shows.. Walking Path — Perimeter walking trail to keep Edina moving. Family Activities — Petting zoo, hayrides, and public pavilion where fun can be had with the whole family. WE CAN RIDE 9V l 1 l ,4y �. Derby for Dollar Events — Annual events can be held at the park to raise money for youth scholarships, programs, and more. Educational Programs — The perfect location for school groups to come and learn about animals and the environment. Volunteer Opportunities — Allows community to work with children and animals. WE CAN -. oe 1982 a Q State of the Art Design - To accommodate the scale and caliber of events and lesson programs anticipated, the center will be designed with the highest quality show rings, trails, stalls, a cross country course and an 2 indoor arenas: + Arena/Stable A: Designed to stable Edina's horse and rings for group and semi private lessons. + Arena/Stable B: Designed to stable We Can Ride's trained-horses and rings for therapy programs. Equine Event Space: Designed to host non= racing competitions, including show jumping, eventing, dressage, and other western riding events. Public Space: Outdoor pavilion overlooking the grounds, petting zoo, pony rides, and a cooling pond for the Pentagon Park Development. 9 �• _ �/ 1987_ O� for g jumping course Public Pavilion /Cooling pond for Pentagon Park WE CAN RIDE WE CAN RIDE Established hippotherapy and therapeutic riding programs Programs caters to participants with a variety of mental and physical disabilities Provides opportunities to volunteer with children and horses Over 30 years of knowledge and experience with managing barn operations, lesson programs, and animal care. www.wecanride.org 1982 �� Indoor /Outdoor Show Arena/Rings — Host saddle seat, dressage, jumping, and various Western disciplines Hunter /Jumper Course — Paddocks and pastures can be formatted in to a 24 obstacle course. Other Equestrian Events - Breed demonstrations, trail riding, 4 -H and other youth activities for all levels of skill and interest. Economic Benefits to the City of Edina + Events will attract people from all over the region - increased business for Edina hotels and restaurantsl WE CAN RIDE m 0 Lockwood Park — Rockwood, IL + Rockford Park District received the 2012 National Gold Medal Award for Excellence in Park and Recreation from the NRPA for their Trailside Equestrian Centre & Children's Farm Buffalo Equestrian Center — Buffalo, NY + Located in the heart of metropolitan . Buffalo and offers riding lessons, event opportunities and therapeutic riding. Promontory - Park City, UT + A first -raze luxury riding center provides trail rides and training for the entire family. �n INS -- d i9az `a� MA Wal so-mrmp—ur � �. ws CAN RWE AWWWft PC n.abwbw— r' c w Q0, law �lld�llp� �' • of ii L Itdl u7¢Os11i�mOe�4� OmalaeRiO�o�HnOi� i �..o. C.WMd- BLUE. ROSE 7 7 WE CAN RIDE vmm $ Mill ion Construction Cost :(approximately) ; + , , x` � R ve � a��� i�rn`• aracJ Pco � s�� ,�,, � 3 �•uw.u��ida.iilLri�GLn� 5b� _ _ e +•xsr.. •uu� + + h t°c ti"a.F "' -:ir Y t �Mr v ! �e "';::•`T,».". + f-, --- •ylyy_"_'�l � +�'i.n.•!�r'.u.ti k�'k��'� w', f'�z,'S$�nSi,u.•1,'_m.�sr';:c�, Cl Expenses Em I r+ IM SORT- 1982 Heather Branigin From: Bernie Beaver <bbeaver44 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 9:58 AM To: Edina Mail; Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Ann Swenson Subject: June 2 Council Meeting and Bike Ordinance Edina Mayor Jim Hovland and City Council Members, This message is primarily for Jim (who probably voted the wrong way for the first time since he has been on the City Council) but I also want to share my thoughts on this topic with all of you. First, I want. to congratulate you and the City of Edina for the awards received recognizing Edina as being a bicycle friendly city. You have made substantial progress on this issue and the attention that the awards bring will only enhance the public awareness needed to further that progress. Much has been accomplished to accommodate bikers in Edina but, as I hope that my message will convey, there is still considerable work to do. There was thoughtful and stimulating discussion at the June 2 meeting that focused on several issues related to biking and its place in a broader transportation system. The issues are complex and there are no perfect answers but I suggest that there be further consideration of the following issues: 1. Biking on streets. Residential streets are good options for bikers (in many cases the only option) but they are not always the best option. Many streets create significant hazards for bikers as bike lanes often are obstructed my manhole covers (not at the same grade as the paving), storm sewer drains, and substantial potholes. Many streets are too narrow, too congested or too busy for safe bicycle riding. 2. Biking on sidewalks. If biking on a city street is not a good option, the sidewalk is often the only option. We should not outlaw the safest option. Some do not want bikers to use the sidewalk but where are most bike racks? - On the sidewalk ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? When a biker wants to cross at a stop light where is the button to activate the light? On the sidewalk ? ? ? ? ? ?? 3. Exceptions based on age. The idea that you can make an arbitrary age distinction for safe bike riding on sidewalks does not create a good solution. What about bikers over age 75 or 80? Are all children under 10 capable of safe riding on a sidewalk? What about an adult with a child on a "tag -a- long" or in a burley? 4. Bikers' risk to pedestrians on sidewalks. There seems to be an assumption that the bikers interfere with and create a risk to pedestrians but, I suggest, that may be in the eye of the beholder. Certainly there are bikers who use poor judgment when riding where pedestrians (or slower bikers) are present. However, there are also pedestrians who use poor judgment when other users of the sidewalk or trail are present. I have witnessed many pedestrians on bike trails using cell phones or walking three abreast engaged in animated conversation and oblivious to others on the trail. 5. Biking where doors open out.. This was listed as one place where bikers should not be allowed. Isn't it also unsafe'to walk past a door that opens out? There is risk if a person opens the door without looking, no matter Who or what is outside thatdoor. Why is it assumed that only the biker is in the wrong? 6. Safe biking. I suggest that most bikers are safety -smart and respectful of others whether on a bike trail, a street or a sidewalk. The same is true of pedestrians and vehicle drivers, but there are always some (of each category) who will make poor'decisions. We are tempted to regulate against such poor behavior but the lists of acceptable and unacceptable behavior are long and the lines between are very blurry. In the final analysis, it is impossible to legislate against stupidity. Reality is that most people use common sense in all that they do but there are always a few who are careless and someone gets hurt. We cannot prevent all harm. There are few ideal options for bikers in Edina but I know that all of you are looking to improve those options. It is best to give bikers maximum flexibility as long as those options are limited. I understand that it is not feasible to create sufficient dedicated bike trails for all bike routes, thus it is important to allow bikers to share the roads and sidewalks with vehicles and pedestrians. We must. get past the public attitude that bikers interfere with other modes of transit and treat them as equals, each expected to learn how to share the roads and sidewalks. Please use restraint in attempting to regulate appropriate biking in Edina. Bernie Beaver 6225 Fox Meadow Lane Edina, MN 55436 Heather Branigin From: Karen M. Kurt Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 3:30 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: FW: chemicals sprayed without warning Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager 952- 826 -04151 Fax 952 -826 -0390 y KKurIA_)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov b. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Julie Mellum rmailto:mellumJulieftmail:c&n Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 10:23 PM To: Dianne Plunkett Latham; Julie Risser; Karen M. Kurt; Scott Neal Subject: chemicals sprayed without warning Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: An unexpected "surprise chemical spraying" for mosquitos occurred last night, June 5, around 9,pm,in our neighborhood —the 5700 block of York Avenue S. While I was outdoors gardening, a big truck with flashing lights slowly advanced down the street with a:large- humming machine that spewed out a great amount of foggy chemicals without warning There were people out walking and other neighbors were also outside, but we were forced to retreat indoors out of concern for our safety. I react severely to chemicals of all kinds —and know that if pesticides can kill insects they can also do considerable damage to children and adults alike — especially those with asthma or other respiratory difficulties. When I called the Police Department, the woman who answered told me that if I was concerned about it to call Metropolitan Mosquito Control, and that the spray was "absolutely non - toxic." When I told her my concerns that all pesticides are toxic, no matter what manufacturers tell you, she was insistent that there was no problem or they wouldn't be spraying. Can someone please tell me if Edina has a program whereby those who are sensitive to chemicals can request that our properties not be sprayed in the future? Other neighbors were also concerned, and we want to know the score. Thank you, Julie Mellum 5700 York Avenue S, Edina, MN 55410 952- 303 -6218 Heather Branigin From: KDahiheimer @comcast.net Sent Saturday, June 07, 2014 9:16 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Dave and Busters Hello ... just watched the meeting from June 3 2014. While I realize it is critical to have a tenant come in for the third floor at Southdale and maybe it is a difficult slot to fill... Dave and Busters seems like a very poor choice for Southdale. I have done a bit of googling ,on the chain and it quickly becomes apparent most people go there to drink, play games and maybe eat. Drinking is the focus. The 70/30 ratio seems unlikely at best. Their reviews are pretty dismal and reflect a place that is clearly not family orientated. Council Member Swenson did some interesting research including the menu, the drinks served in large containers to a table where even the reps from Dave and Busters could not indicate how you could monitor underage drinking—and her comments are spot on as far as I'm concemed. There is much `high end housing going in very close to Southdale and I can't see any of those residents being interested in a place like this to say nothing of the Westin Condo residents. There is already some marginal activities going on in the theater area and then you are going to add this place open until tam ? ?? My daughter works at Macy's and frankly when they have their late night sales etc. I think it adds to safety concerns for people working in the mall and will no doubt require much additional security at the mall which it seems is paid for by taxpayers. I vote a loud no to any further consideration of this idea for Southdale and feel it will take the mall down a road that makes it unlikely many of us that actually go to spend money at the merchants will venture over there as often. I think Simon needs to find a tenant more consistent with the goal of making Southdale an upscale mall once again. I understand the feelings that Simon has the same goals as the city and we need to trust their judgment but in this case I think they have missed the mark and maybe settling for something questionable. I think with the transit station at Southdale you will be getting business all right but not sure it will be from Edina residents. Heather Braniain From: John Erlandson <dickerland @aol:com> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2014 2:41 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Park Repurposing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Edina Staff; understand there is to be a meeting scheduled for Thursday, June 12 at whichEdina residents are invited to give input for the repurposing of the Fred Richards land when the golf course is closed at the end of the 2014 season. Since the, input of Edina residence people is solicited and will be used to design the park that is to replace the golf course it would certainly be expected that the plan to use $35,200.00 for consulting work would be rescinded. Can you confirm this for me? To cancel this $35;200.00 consulting fee would be a welcome savings for tax payers. Thank you.. Sincerely, Dick Erlandson 1 Heather Branigin From:. Rick Wesselman <rickwesselman @gmail.com> Sent: Sunda_ y, June 08, 2014 5:32 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Regarding Braemar Golf Course Attachments: WESSELMAN DESIGN GROUP-MAY 2014.pdf Dear Mayor and Council, I am contacting you regarding the Braemar Golf Course renovation. My name is Rick Wesselman and I am the President/ Chief Architect of Wesselman Design Group, a golf course design firm specializing in new course design, renovation work and master planning. I have been in the golf course industry for over 30 years and have been designing or remodeling golf courses for the last 17 years. I have worked for some, if not the best architects in the world, namely Tom Fazio and Dye Designs as well as professional golfers Phil Mickelson and Hale Irwin; If you are looking for golf course design services for an up -coming design or renovation project, I would like the opportunity; to talk with you about being your "Golf Course Architect /Design Consultant ". At Wesselman Design Group, we can design a "Signature quality" golf course at a budget friendly price. Our lower design fees can help make it possible for your golf course vision to become a reality. We feel you should pay for the design of the course and not the name of the designer. This is why our fees.are less than half of those charged by the typical "Signature" designer. I would appreciate having an opportunity to submit a design and /or proposal for your future projects. I have included my professional background and experience on my website (www.WesselmanDesiga.com), as well as numerous projects and photos I have been blessed to have been a part of. It also lists awards have been received for courses I worked on while as the lead designer or design associate. I have attached a brochure describing my design firm's experience and capabilities as well as examples of my work. I would like to thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you about possible new opportunities working together. Sincerely, Rick Wesselman President /Chief Architect Wesselman Design Group Golf Course Design and Renovation 7856 S. Elizabeth Way Centennial, Colorado USA 80122 Phone 303 909 -3904 RickWesseknanna gmail com 1 www.WesselmanDesign com W G�r G*q C.d f�v�x.�• Rick Wesselman President/Chief Architect 7856 S. Elizabeth Way Centennial, Colorado 80122 USA Phone: 1303-862-6600 Cell: 1303- 909 -3904 E -Mail: RickWesselman@ mail.com Website: www.WesselmanDesign.com Rick Wesselman, RYA My name is Rick Wesselman and I am the President/Chief Architect of Wesselman Design Group and a Registered Landscape Architect in the State of Colorado,.USA. I have more than 30 years of golf course design, construction and maintenance experience. My resume includes over 50 projects ranging from public to private and resort courses, Par 3 courses and practice/learning facilities as well as restoration and renovation projects. My design work has earned a reputation for developing creative design solutions to a variety of environmental and planning issues. I have worked for some, if not the best architects in the world, namely Tom Fazio and Dye Designs as well as professional golfers Phil Mickelson and Hale Irwin. . During my 30+ years of golf course experience, I have been influenced in his designs by the landforms and strategic qualities of the natural landscape. These attributes continue today to define the standard for the best in golf course architecture. My entire adult career has been centered around golf course design and renovation and is quite extensive. I have worked on all types of golf projects from driving range design to 9 hole par -3 courses to 18 hole championship courses with over $25 million dollar budgets. At Wesselman Design Group, we can design a "Signature quality" golf course at a budget friendly price. Our lower design fees can help make it possible for your golf course vision to become a reality. We feel you should pay for the design of the course and not the name of the designer. This is why our fees are less than half of those charged by the typical "Signature" designer. I have included my professional background and experience on my website (www.WesselmanDesi .com), as well as numerous projects and photos I have been blessed to have been a part of If you are looking for golf course design services for an up- coming development project or renovation work on an existing course, I would like the opportunity to talk with you about being your "Golf Course Architect/Design Consultant". Philosophy At Wesselman Design Group, our philosophy of working with the natural terrain is based on the principal of golf s original architecture. Our experience has taught us that golf course design is a "site- specific" discipline with respect to the existing terrain and. our approach allows us to incorporate these unique opportunities into the design. Sensitivity to the environment is key to everyone at Wesselman Design Group. The best golf holes "follow" the terrain. There's simply no point in designing a golf course that looks and feels like it belongs somewhere else. Instead, we use the natural elements of the land to create a strategy that will blend them into the layout. We specialize. in creating courses that bring out the natural beauty of the native landscape. We believe that each course should be indigenous to its area and enhance the existing surroundings to produce the finest golf course. As a result, our courses present a variety of risk/reward challenges that draw golfers of all skill levels to play them again and again. Our philosophy also lends itself extremely well to a wide variety of golfers with varying levels of ability. The job of the designer is to provide a challenge to advanced players without creating so much frustration that higher handicap players leave the game of golf or migrate to a less difficult course. We use several techniques in our designs to prevent this from happening by paying particular attention to these different abilities. We understand that the majority of golfers are out to enjoy a game of golf with a companion in a pleasant setting. In designing a golf course, we embrace the natural and historical surroundings of the site. Today's golfers enjoy an endless variety of golf courses, which adds immeasurably to interest in the game. Our designs take advantage of every opportunity each site offers. My experience in the turf industry is also invaluable in creating courses that will not only survive the rigors of daily use and easily maintained but continue to improve as the surrounding landscape matures. Our work ranges from new course design, renovation/master planning, restoration as well as practice and teaching facilities. Our design team, led by Rick Wesselman, will create a golf course that enhances the natural aesthetic of the land and provides for flexibility of shot values. Based on site visits and program requirements, we produce high quality and accurate detailed plans, specifications and bid documents at affordable costs. We are directly involved in every aspect of the design process. During construction, Mr. Wesselman makes regular site visits to oversee the work in progress and direct any work that needs specific designer input. The goal of Wesselman Design Group is to design unique, high quality golf courses which create value and are a pleasure to experience. Each project is unique and presents new challenges, opportunities and solutions. Great care is taken in, planning golf strategy and shot values that allow many options to the golfer. The result is a golf course that is fair, challenging, and truly enjoyable. Our experience.has taught us that golf course design is a "site- specific" discipline. Subtle nuances of the course take time to reveal themselves. Onsite visits, Rick's vision and years of experience allow the discovery of new design possibilities and alternatives that present themselves during the construction process. Our approach allows us to incorporate these unique opportunities into the design process. We take full advantage of existing site features to create a golf course design that is never forced or contrived Our flexibility, sensitivity, and responsiveness to both site revelations and client suggestions, enhances our continuing quest to produce the world's forest golf courses. What transforms a great design vision into a great golf course is our commitment to bring our experience to the site as often as possible. Cri tical to the 'process.is communication between owner, architect and construction supervisors. It is paramount to our approach and to the successes of our many projects. Wesselman Design Group is committed to meeting the goals and desires of our clients. To achieve the high standards demanded on every course, each project receives Rick's personal attention. Our goal is to develop an overall concept plan that will optimize the client's development agenda, while providing for high- quality golf course design and maximum playability. It will outline the variety of shots required on the course by depicting the placement of the golfing features such as greens, tees, fairways, and hazards. To achieve this goal, we will work in conjunction with the client's land use planner, engineers, clubhouse and landscape architects, hydrology consultants, and any other necessary professionals. The conceptual routing plan will also establish the safety corridors that define the golfing space within the project's overall site plan As we prepare the conceptual routing plans of the golf course, we constantly study the site's characteristics to ensure that our design concept enhances the natural features of the property. This approach of being environmentally sensitive and designing with the natural terrain and features of the site results in a course that blends seamlessly with its surroundings and appears to have been part of the landscape for generations. Rick Wesselman and Wesselman Design Group are highly dedicated to the game of golf, and the design staff feels strongly that the future of golf lies in the constant introduction of the game to future golfers, while continually challenging the seasoned veterans. Providing a memorable and enjoyable golf experience is a primary goal in every Wesselman golf design. We feel .we are uniquely positioned to answer this challenge. Environmental Concerns At Wesselman Design Group, we strive to be a leader in environmentally sensitivegolf course design. With playability and shot values a priority, we excel at incorporating these qualities in golf course designs, while maintaining and enhancing the natural beauty of the surrounding environment. The result is a golf course that is not only aesthetically pleasing, but also a great test for golfers of all abilities. The environmental concerns of a golf course development and its operation, with which the public is most aware, are the use of fertilizer and pesticides and their potential contamination of water supplies. Our environmental policy addresses this issue, as well as the issues of wildlife habitat preservation and enhancement, and water and soil conservation. The following are key points regarding environmental mitigation: The routing is developed so as to avoid interference with native and other environmentally sensitive areas. Access through such areas by golfers is restricted to defined paths, which can be elevated structures, if necessary, and located to provide the shortest possible route to the golf course playing surfaces. Since much of environmental protection has to do with preventing surface runoff that may contain fertilizers and pesticides, we often use the following measures: • Create a buffer strip between the golf course and the environmentally, sensitive areas. In many cases, this consists of native vegetation undisturbed during construction. In other cases, the buffer consists of rough grasses, the varieties of which are chosen for their draught tolerance and characteristics similar to native grasses found on site. In still other cases, the buffer consists of waste bunkers or waste areas. Waste areas were originally designed as low maintenance areas to help lower overall maintenance costs by requiring little or no fertilizer, water and/or mowing. But as an added benefit, they act as a buffer between golf course and native habitat, which is especially helpful in limiting the impact of the golf course on native areas. • To further lessen the impact on native habitats, we can design a drainage system that addresses today's environmental concerns. Water can be retained within the golf course and its release controlled through the use of holding ponds. Holding ponds, coupled with waste areas, collect drainage water not only from the golf course, but the development as well, where the water, in effect, is `Tiltered" before it leaves the property. These are often incorporated into the golf course design as features and add to the strategy of the course as well as retain water for re -use. - During construction, erosion control is always important. Most sites have native areas that require erosion control, These areas are fenced and designated as "no touch" zones during construction, and protected with appropriate erosion control means, such as fencing, matting, netting, straw bales, etc., as designated by engineers and environmental consultants. This ensures that these areas remain an asset to the golf course. We have a reputation for creating natural looking holes on land that blends into its surroundings. Wildlife management and habitat enhancement are also important issues. Whenever possible, native local vegetation is left intact and made part of the golf course so as not to disturb or diminish existing wildlife food sources. Should areas require re- vegetation, local native species are introduced to enable the course to blend into its surroundings. Wesselman Design tries to create an environment that is equal to or better that its original state. Grassing/Water Conservation The Wesselman Design Group style lends itself well to the conservation of water. The use of native grass types has always been a key in Wesselman Design's design style, even before the current environmental awareness became popular Our philosophy is to provide highly maintained tees, greens and fairways bordered by roughs that give way to indigenous grasses in the out -of -play areas. We believe the key to water conservation is to properly utilize the tools the industry manufacturers have developed, making these tools an integral part of a grassing scheme. The only effective means of conserving large quantities- of water is to utilize turf- grasses that do not require extensive watering. We implement grassing concepts that utilize drought tolerant turf - grasses and native landscape materials... Great effort goes into each irrigation design to ensure that water is used wisely and sparingly. Wesselman Design Group specifies the use of a computer, controlled system with the capability to monitor weather conditions and soil moisture. The control system also has the ability to use information such as sprinkler location, spacing, percolation rates and precipitation rates to adjust watering times. Combining this system with the use of adjustable sprinkler heads, precise spacing, and close attention'to grassing details, we present an irrigation package that is state- of -the-art in water, application and conservation. Wesselman Design Group also promotes the use of effluent water for irrigation purposes. As water becomes more and more valuable, preference will be placed on projects that can make use of treated water. In the irrigation design process, we assume that all projects will eventually be required to use treated water is some fashion and thus design them accordingly, specifying an irrigation system that can handle or be easily converted to handle effluent water. Client/Designer /Contractor Relationship A key to cost effective construction is a good relationship between the client, designer and contractor. Wesselman Design Group has actively promoted and participated in "project partnering." By understanding the needs and objectives of each respective group, problems can be anticipated before they happen and can be handled efficiently or, in many cases, avoided altogether by trying to create a win/win situation for everyone. Our experience has shown that projects handled in this way come in on budget and on time, often creating more character in the golf course than originally planned. We. only accept the number of design commissions that will allow us to play an active, personal role during construction. This provides a great benefit to the project manager and golf course contractor. It has always been our opinion that, in golf course architecture,'through all of the different phases, architects that only develop plans and are not on -site regularly are unable to produce the same results as a company such as our own. Being completely absorbed in each project is what sets . Wesselman Design apart from other golf course architectural firms. Golf Course Design Project Experience LD =Lead Designer United States: Hallbrook Coungy Club (renovation) — Leawood, KS Branson Creek Golf Club —Branson, MO (Fazio) LD Weston Stonebriar Country Club — Frisco, TX (Fazio) Vaquero Golf Club — Westlake, TX (Fazio) LD Website: (Tom Fazio) LD www.Hallbrookcc. org www. bramvoncreekgol . com LD www.gnlfte .ay. comlhollcmd95. htrn www. Vaqueroclub. com Dallas National Golf Club — Dallas, TX (Fazio) LD www.dallasnationalgolLclub.com Whisper Rock:Golf Club (Fazio Course) — Scottsdale, AZ (Fazio) LD tivww. WhisperRockGolf. cof�z Shooting Star Golf Club Jackson Hole, WY (Fazio) LD www.ShootingStardH.com Members Club at Aldarra — Fall City, WA (Fazio) LD www .thenaemberscluhataldaira.com Carlton Woods-(Fazio Course) —The Woodlands, TX (Fazio) LD www.carltomvoods.com First Tee'at Thunderbird - Phoenix, AZ (Fazio) LD ivww.thefirstteephoenix.org Spring Hi1ltM'try Club — Wayzata, MN. (Fazio) wwtiv.golflink.coin Barton Creek (Canyons Course) — Austin, TX (Fazio) wwiv.bartoncreek.comlzolf Bachmann Sminas Golf Club — Tombstone, AZ (Fazio) LD wwvv.bachmannspriiaQS.corn Lodestone 'Golf Club (Hale Irwin Course) — McHenry, MD (Design Workshop) www.lodestoneQnIfconz River RockGolf Club (Phil Mickelson.Course) — Glenville, NC (Design Workshop)..- Cherry Hills Cou Club (restoration) = Denver, CO (Forrest Richardson) ivww:chcc.com Papaao Park Golf (restoration) — Phoenix, AZ (Forrest Richardson & Assoc.) wivw.papagoaolfcourse.net Torrey Pines S.Course (consulting/NGF) — San Diego, CA (Forrest Richardson) Peacock Gap Golf Club'— San Rafael, CA (Forrest Richardson & Assoc.) www.peacoekg-ap e.com Wailea Blue Coursed Renovation Plans— Wailea, HI (Forrest Richardson) www.waileaoldblue.com Pueblo del Sol C.C. (master'plan)— Sierra Vista, AZ .(Forrest Richardson) LD www.pdsc6untryclub.com Ping Golf Clubs (test facility) -Phoenix, AZ (Forrest Richardson & Assoc.) LD China: Kunming Cloud Bay Resort - Kunming, China (Dye Designs Group) CTS Tycoon Golf Club Shenzhen, China (Dye Designs Group) www.tycoongol.com The Dye Course at Poly and'Foisan Golf - Guangzhou, China (Dye. Designs Group) Xi'An International Complex — Xi'An, China (Dye Designs Group) Tian Jin East Coast Snorts Complex — Tian Jin, China (Dye Designs Group) Proposed — Wuhan, China - 6 hole, par 3 course with double greens, large villa real estate (Wesselman Design Group) Europe: Falesia D'el Rev — Obidos, Portugal (Dye Designs Group) Dream Island Golf Club - Baku, Azerbaijan (Dye Designs Group) Proposed — Near Dresden, Germany - 6 hole par 3 course inside existing 18 hole golf course (Wesselman Design Group) . Central America: Cabo Ouerencia — Cabo San Lucas, Mexico (Fazio) LD www.loscabosguerencia.com Papaaayo Golf Club Resort— Guanacaste, Costa Rica (Design Workshop) LD w/Jesper Parnevik Proposed — Near. San Jose, Costa Rica. - 18 hole course with resort housing and amenities (Wesselman Design Group) Proposed - Near Upala, Costa Rica - 9 hole golf course with Eco hotel and resort-style housing (Wesselman Design Group) South Pacific: Gouaro Deva Golf Course, Noum6a, New Caledonia (Dye Designs Group) Turkey: Proposed —Near Gazipasa, Turkey - 9 hole par 3 course with resort style real estate and amenities (Wesselman Design Group) Proposed —Near Ankara, Turkey- 18 hole championship golf curse with real estate. (Wesselman Design Group) India• Proposed — Near Hyderabad, India, - 27 holes of championship golf with resort hotel, conference center, real estate. (Wesselman Design Group) Proposed = Near New Delhi, India -18 hole championship golf course (Wesselman Design Group) Proposed — Near New Delhi, India - 9 hole golf course with practice facility (Wesselman Design Group) Professional Awards and achievements The awards that have been received for courses Rick worked on while a lead designer while at Fazio Golf Course Designers, Design Workshop and Dye Designs Group include: (The following with Tom Fazio Golf Course Designers) Branson Creek, Branson, Missouri, USA - Ranked #1 by Golf Magazine and .Golf Digest as the "Top Public Courses in Missouri" for eleven consecutive years (2000 - 2010). - 2010 Golf Magazine named Branson Creek Golf Club #82 on its list of the "Top 100 Courses You Can Play in America ". Dallas National Golf Club Dallas, Texas, USA - Ranked #59 in U.S. in Golf Digest' s Top 100 Courses (2007 and 2009, 2011 -2012) - Ranked #24 in Golf Week's Top 100 Modern Courses (2006) — Ranked #1 in the State of Texas (2011 -2012) Vaquero Golf Club; Westlake, Texas, USA —Avid Golfer lvlagazine names Vaquero Club "No. 1 of the Best -of Private Clubs" for 2nd year in a row. (2010) Shooting Star, Jackson Hole; Wyoming; USA - Ranked #3 Best New Courses 2010 by Golf Week Magazine - Ranked #98 in U.S. in Links Magazine's Top 100 Courses in the U.S. (2011 -2012) Lodestone Golf Club, McHenry, Maryland, USA (with Design Workshop Golf and professional golfer Hale Irwin) - Lodestone Golf Club - #2 Best Course You Can Play in Maryland - Golfweek, 2011 -State By State Ranking - Lodestone Golf Club - #3 'Best Courses You Can Play" in Maryland - Golf Magazine, 2010 - Lodestone Golf Club - #7 "Best New Courses in the Country - Golf Magazine, 2011 CTS Tycoon ( Shenzhen) Golf Club, Shenzhen, China (with Dye Designs Group) - Ranked Top Ten New Golf Courses in China 2009 -2010 by Golf Magazine - Awarded Best Golf Course Design 2010 by China Golf AFFILIATIONS Member, American Society of Landscape Architects Member, Golf Course Builders Association of America Member, United States Golf Association REGISTRATION Landscape Architect, Colorado, No. 334 Design Process 'Ibc fimtjUp Im dowd" the River Rock Clatf Club Is to Idea" the routing -. the 18-bole rcad map by wbkb, the can= Is play* L Ibc da*m tam coaductod M=Cms aft Vids and lmvmdhuu&t& of bow to uncom the beat arbud ftatum the site bn:t)D offer, which pro* diat.be.cm.m.w.dem, dw ambu char- acter and soul of the pWaman . rittrA4 doze= of M-6-na pum wem drmlapO to unro ver the bat holes and acquenting of holm WaLk pram&wy *Cwbcs:awldm 104"ie4th Owe ft FWcome smftga Wcktd4N-tlk;p=hl laadw"*;ttum,An&natmc# afthe ifte arefttber lnVCSl5*tCd-,m a hoW)y-halt buk, to beta to develop the -mdVlftzl.ChAtxUr of Cwh:90ftole.. FACb Bole is uifique =dafteavatiety 2a.diatemuo tbatInthe e4 the co4ecdou.cf.44 indlyMM SoWboma tab allcar. Here we.metboAft forfttun hole fmc. . ndmbkdftsh Wei SmdInS stm&a . 'we: ddkw.tbr pmiat pliyab&tty and d66cftdM*x � ballsilatlid ,:,dWllm,*dtD ]DOW dt,m& hole. Here we see de dga casicepta and skekhm. t1lo 41MIJ pmd"Adine wwbkhftc.hxktIAmdftxm; qfthe We= sating for bole tyc.-. Srow4.*akcm,hanrd& and mxh, Ilem Is an culy Sadhig concept for bak ftm. I it JIM 'Ibc fimtjUp Im dowd" the River Rock Clatf Club Is to Idea" the routing -. the 18-bole rcad map by wbkb, the can= Is play* L Ibc da*m tam coaductod M=Cms aft Vids and lmvmdhuu&t& of bow to uncom the beat arbud ftatum the site bn:t)D offer, which pro* diat.be.cm.m.w.dem, dw ambu char- acter and soul of the pWaman . rittrA4 doze= of M-6-na pum wem drmlapO to unro ver the bat holes and acquenting of holm WaLk pram&wy *Cwbcs:awldm 104"ie4th Owe ft FWcome smftga Wcktd4N-tlk;p=hl laadw"*;ttum,An&natmc# afthe ifte arefttber lnVCSl5*tCd-,m a hoW)y-halt buk, to beta to develop the -mdVlftzl.ChAtxUr of Cwh:90ftole.. FACb Bole is uifique =dafteavatiety 2a.diatemuo tbatInthe e4 the co4ecdou.cf.44 indlyMM SoWboma tab allcar. Here we.metboAft forfttun hole fmc. . ndmbkdftsh Wei SmdInS stm&a . 'we: ddkw.tbr pmiat pliyab&tty and d66cftdM*x � ballsilatlid ,:,dWllm,*dtD ]DOW dt,m& hole. Here we see de dga casicepta and skekhm. t1lo 41MIJ pmd"Adine wwbkhftc.hxktIAmdftxm; qfthe We= sating for bole tyc.-. Srow4.*akcm,hanrd& and mxh, Ilem Is an culy Sadhig concept for bak ftm. r, : ?' r e T puf ig:eonce^. siting with strategy tnd ialapt - tymmtiva, tiara mcried t y:tht- catiredadpi team is mtensive deggn'toOm tmtila Amlcomptb iderid- fi ed A pnfetred grading plan is then prepared in move detail IB;= I ues far each hole, w seen hem. fdr hod -ITT. Erb+ ilufetz� �e;�er:aitack �Ga WIF Selected course photos from portfolio. Shooting Star, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, USA - Ranked #3 Best New Courses 2010 by Golf Week Magazine - Ranked #98 in U.S. in Links Magazine's Top 100 Courses in the U.S. (2011 -2012) HOLE #2 HOLE #5 Whisper Rock Golf Club (Upper Course) HOLE #13 Lodestone Golf Club, McHenry, Maryland, USA - Lodestone Golf Club - #2 Best Course You Can Play in Maryland - Golfweek, 2011 State By State Ranking - Lodestone Golf Club - #3 'Best Courses You Can Play" in Maryland - Golf Magazine, 2010 - Lodestone Golf Club - #7 'Best New Courses in the Country - Golf Magazine, 2011 Vaquero Golf Club, Westlake, Texas, USA - Avid Golfer Magazine names Vaquero Club "No. 1 of the Best of Private Clubs" for 2nd year in a row. (20 10) HOLE #6 Dallas National Golf Club, Dallas, Texas, USA - Ranked #59 in U.S. in Golf Digest's Top 100 Courses (2007 and 2009, 2011 -2012) - Ranked #24 in Golf Week's Top 100 Modern Courses (2006) — Ranked #1 in the State of Texas (2011 -2012) HOLE #10 Branson Creek, Branson, Missouri, USA - Ranked #1 by Golf Magazine and Golf Digest as the "Top Public Courses in Missouri" for eleven consecutive years (2000- 2010). - 2010 Golf Magazine named Branson Creek Golf Club #82 on its list of the "Top 100 Courses You Can Play in America ". HOLE #17 t y, S _ w z* x f Y ,5 P I ESE VT way Rh ' �it Fi o '' ., ��<...:'fi.• a, x .+,.ilk G n r� 'I " � 6fI �YQ �'� ��� � it t }} 4 ' Aw Al IW At Wuhan, Hubei Province PRFL MiNARY CONCEPT A 4¢nfcmha 7.2AII W.wwcarw •osaaaw Prolu>t Future L.agoor Roort- 13ontiyi I Itucl master plan preliminary ca'nce:p..t «A» �„ SCORECARD Prelirrona 'Cone 'K Hole Par DL Yardage Hole Par OL Yardage 1 4 L 406 10 5 L 426 2 3 1 :04 11 4 4 -376 3 5 L 566 12 3 Ise 4 4 R 464 13 4 R 561 5 4 R 39 71 5 R 475 6 5 R 601 16 4 L. 446 7 3 236. 16 3 W _ a 4- _ L 454 17 4 R _ 217 9 4 L 41 0 L ntaloa 1 35 1 3t4 3705 L GMw Ielal I X436 1 pals •CPrptk iIMW M %wa•pbaYAwwaQa<mi,clM rtfM rllt IauPNMaicNaeafu paoaawMYVndManPlKprMY4rtn Pd:ai3Prim 4m•N.,W,wll.le;l,blauC, ralu Nnaurn+dnweeta+V!M.. itP aklaMeKMPN !l+�v,N1MIwNlrP/dadlidera trt aadaa ' P Oal M[eM aq,Ni told b f aaNA Ytlaq dl Pa.l' M N pl cW s M1OPMPq %e M ohmnp geld de M nl!uwldl lefNr P M prghly. 1hR dlyd rY af! N Y daP M M ePli ldf to prad..a mou mna b' M ap* trao..6Yti•!!� es. ae u W aiP, of m ta:0. b W b.Ml «aew+,awl aa.Pr. NNW!dbawa� WrA'lae.ew MWtlmMlr_.wmleww.�nwdntenw.d va �m�ePP,nw,NrVOh •n.r.�.mad.n.ertw.l.ePar oat w.ra: �lu.waY. ssv.r.twraean�u+ Y.RC G � W h Eh bowa�.indn,wd lai hrriN erio-rotvw. •eMinuri�Ma•w�tvneslt..rir,6eP,w Ntewp a4,rr4t�on.da!Iym Ow aeaua (,e..fnina,W a.t.wL rx!arpoPewnwwtrWen ulMwn+4rrax pate. y..i mprnaM.e.agr dMyrtw.d...w ntbiMlrw,e/wnsws sm c,.am w. aoaopprm.4gaaeanana:aealr 16'd`FntlpMde.ae N4PHwM '1N MA bkln p4P.tMaeYalMM4Nggyqtk p5d U+YObIPfC W�al,pan. reuaaaaNtiM .IEMM•aldwMep MI PpIM'b.dh.K4pt0.!l,lpt )geMFKPMM+a odapp• rMIPMt MdDMP�l.o�1n4WG Wtl0100d OnRCnVgearM FH1a1AtW inM HdPUy nIP p,o. aptE PvM wM1,.,r Il�pan ¢IMIr,YIY, PnePd► 9p aplP, W. ' TlrtfvaaK1n11dB6pp10paN MIO of 11MWY{a,ilYd M Wiy M slGnl ppp4.PrY .'�d Lth,el.4 ibt�einpndNwa TYeMr!lnrmm eNM'a4 of WiwrpelJw.t J,r Pa rw,ryn ro i4A t+,i eu can niw+al W q u ee *�IIh o pwma GICOTJARQ DEVA .GOLF4' RESC ln' �Ydatta* �"njad•�i+4atn Propnsed Future Desclopnunt Proposed RoA Practice Frac17rty Proposed \(yntenance 11ma Golf Club Hose N f. 5 =FMZM wm 222M. IBM iaombmOmmaim 11*4411ja - G R' Golf Club ui m ar Masterplan SCALE 1 :2500 I . Obho G R' Golf Club ui m ar Masterplan SCALE 1 :2500 jm RANCH RESORTS II I i PRELIMINARY GOLF CONCEPT JULY 7, 2011 Branson Creek - HOLE #11 1 Rick Wesselman President/Chief Architect Wesselman Design Group Golf Course Design 7856 S. Elizabeth Way, Centennial, Colorado 80122 USA Phone: 1303 - 862 -6600 Cell: 1303 - 909 -3904 E- mail: RickWesselmgnna'gmail.com Website: www.WesselmanDesign.com Heather Branigin From: Ken Potts <potts003 @grnail.corn> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 9,54 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Kevin Staunton; Michael Platteter, claudiaj.carr @yahoo.com; arlenef @aol.com; Susan Lee; joannolson @Isadesigninc.com; Richard & Nancy Scherer, micha6l.schroeder@lhbcorp.com Subject: letter to Council Attachments: .6 -9 -14 Ken to Council.pdf Please distribute to Council and Include in the next Council Correspondence Packet. Thank you, Ken Potts i June 9, 2014 Edina City Council 4801 W. 5CP Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members, This letter is to notify you of my resignation from the Edina Planning Commission. When I applied for the Commission, it seemed an ideal way to provide community service in the City that has been my residence for more than 20. years. It was the chance be a volunteer; and contribute a combination of my passion for the City with my professional training in support of Edina's high quality of life. On the. commercial redevelopment front, I think this has gone quite well. Ongoing, underway, or still being planned are numerous projects. These have been carefully vetted against the goals ofthe Comprehensive Plan. They will add services; opportunities and residential density that, in my opinion, will benefit the City for many years to come. Residents and businesses alike. Through the course of hearing from the design and construction community relative to many such projects, I have been encouraged to learn about, the aggressiveness by the City's staff to uphold development and construction regulatory standards. This reputation in the commercial sector is one for city taxpayers to be proud of as it is only through consistent enforcement of these rules that the quality of life and protection of public and private property is realized. On the residential front, sadly, it is a very different story. Beginning with my service on the Residential Redevelopment Working Group I heard from many individual citizens of regulatory mistakes, oversights and errors. At worst, these caused serious property damage and set next door neighbors against each other. Less worse, but still significant, are the detrimental quality of life impacts. Perhaps most disturbing is the City's lack of willingness to take action and create remedies for these situations (which typically arose due to the City's own passive approach to upholding the Code). I continue to hear cases from impacted City residents where City staff appease builders to the detriment of adjacent homeowners. Variances are inadvertently granted, and discretion blatantly exercised which is never in favor of protecting adjoining private property and too often has a negative impact on City infrastructure. I am only one of many citizens who has spoken out about this and no longer hold out hope for near -term significant improvement in the process. I have come to realize that the best form of community service I can provide to my fellow taxpayers is no longer a seat on the Planning Commission. My, time will be better spent directly assisting City residents who find themselves on the losing end of a dispute with a homebuilder who knows what they can get away with in their interactions with regulatory staff. These residents may not have working knowledge of the redevelopment process. They are pitted against builders who have both intimate knowledge of the process and who know what they can get approved by staff; even if it means skirting aspects of the Code. Edina can be much better than this, but to realize that potential will require change. Ken Potts 4236 Crocker Ave Edina, MN 55416 potts003 @gmaf.com cc: Edina Planning Commission Members Heather Branigin From: Rose C Minor < rose, minor @stepbystepmontessori.com> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 12:34 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague7 @ gmail.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: sen.melisa.franzen @senate.mn; rep.paul.rosenthal @house.mn; rep. ron.erha rdt@house. mn; Scott Neal; 'Mike Minor' Subject: Feedback on Proposed Re- Zoning of 3360 66th St W Attachments: 20140606151518663, pdf Dear Mayor Hovland and City Councilmembers: Please find the attached letter regarding the proposed re- zoning of 3360 66th Street in Edina. We believe there is still much discussion required regarding the re- zoning proposal and the incompatibility of the proposed use of the site and its proximity to a Montessori School and child care center. We are confident that you and the council will provide the leadership to reach a decision beneficial to all the residents of Edina. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Rose Minor Administrator Step By Step Montessori Schools (763) 557 -6777 June 6, 2014 Mayor Hovland and City Councilmembers City of.Edina 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 . Re: Proposed Re- zoning of 3360 W. 66s` Street Dear Mayor and Councihnembers :. We are Step By Step Montessori Schools. We are one of the United States. We operate 8 Montessori Schools and Child Care children,. We are not a franchise; we. are locally owned and ope Edina at 6519 Barrie Road. Step By Step has been in this 'loc Montessori School. has served the residents of.Edina in this loc building since 1993; we invested in the area when many -would investment in the area to ensure that residents :have: an excepho deciding to invest in the area much of our decision was predicate ganizations in the I'd serve about 1200 for: the residents of r .... p ifior ownership a Step has owned the to .make significant ing their young children.. When laws in the area, typically we.do not operate our centers in residentially zoned areas. At that time we felt fiery comfortable making our investment based on the stated direction by the city of Edina. Currently we serve approximately 150 children age six weeks through six years in this location. Approximately 88 of those childten and -their families are current residents of Edina. Over the years we've prepared . thousands of children m Edwin fc a lifetime love of learning. We have become a trusted partner for providing high quality early education. for the children in the community. For decades we 'have watched the growth and improvement of this area,. largely due to the city's focus on maintaining EL regional medical district. We hope you and the City Council will continue to place a premium on maintaining the integrity of this medical district We urge the council to deny agy request to rezone the property, located at 3360 6& Street West (currently TCF.Bank), to allow for a multi- family supportive housing project for displaced young adults: J48t to provide you a frame of reference, our school is located Northeast of the TCF� Bank . building approximately 100yards from them ddle of the current TCF Bank parking lot to our front door. We are opposed to the rezoning for the number of issues this presents to the existing members of the community. The obvious one is parking. There are already severe limitations in parking and changing the zoning to allow for a residence will only 'exasperate the probletn. Our experience shows that parking is always an issue, especially when working with an existing footprint; please do not underestimate the increased traffic brought to this small area by finis project no matter what.:kind of estimates are provided, estimates are usually wrong. Secondly, being a business. owner and taxpayer in the city, of Edina .for over 22 years we are concerned about the rezoning fiom commercial to residential districts. Ultimately this erodes the tax base in the. city and deca•eases revenues for the City: Eventually this inevitable slioitfall will fall to the existing taxpayers to shoulder the burden of the Administratiuti:oll"ict11: 4355'Fligliwa�u t69 o Plymouth, NN, 554 2 763- 557 -6777 Sc hi,iil Lpcatians Edina= $outhdale • Dtocil<lyn ti.trl • C'hesi:a (:gixncc�n + plA Ie Cron c i lllymoutlt ': St: Anthony Ik �1nV7.dti - ,Rldgedale Mayor & Councilmembers June 6, 2014 Page 2 difference. Finally, we are also concerned about the new uses and incompatibility this new zoning presents to child care centers. We feel this is completely incompatible with current zoning. Ms. Blons has stated this project will be similar to their existing housing project located-on.. 3710 Nicollet Ave. Based on Minneapolis Police reports there were 51 responses by Mpls Police over a 21 month period at this address. Calls ranging from fights, assaults, domestic abuse, person with a gun, the%'property damage, etc. I've attached a copy of this report for your information. This seems like an excessive number of calls and leaves us with lots of unanswered questions regarding the impact to the children in our program and the impact.this has on prospective parents wishing to enroll their children in our program. We attended the City Council meeting on May 20s'. It was somewhat surprising to hear many in the council voicing such strong support during a sketch plan meeting. It certainly sounds like the council's approval is just a foregone conclusion and the public's input would merely be a formality. I was also very surprised to hear Ms. Blons talk with such conviction that she had talked to her neighbors regarding the project. We were equally disappointed at the public comments from Beacon Interfaith on reaching out to neighbors and members of the community. We have received no such communication; so it appears Beacon is already cutting corners in this process. Where else can we expect them to cut corners? Step By Step deals with a family's most precious assets. Many prospective parents hear that a project like the proposed one is coming to the area and their imaginations conjure up all kinds of scenarios of how their children will be impacted, mainly adversely impacted, whether realistic or not does not matter. We have already had a couple comments from prospective parents asking if we were aware of the project. Needless to say they did not enroll their children at just the mention of someone running a supervised facility for teens in the area: We remain opposed to the rezoning of this area outlined above; we were shocked and appalled to hear that a facility serving young adults would not be supervised 24x7 especially after receiving the police report We certainly applaud your leadership in trying to support teens in transition and for finding an appropriate site where everyone in the community can embrace these young adults and support them as they work to become self - sufficient adults. Sincerely, �^ n / 1 Ro :;,-e-- or /J President Step By Step Montessori Schools 6519 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 763 -557 -6777 CC: Sen. Melissa Franzen 651- 296 -6238 sen.melissa.franzen@senate.mn Rep. Paul Rosenthal 651- 296 -7803 rep.paulaosenthal@house.mn Rep. Ron Erhardt 651- 296 -4363 rep.ron.erhardtnao house.mn Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Chime Management Division 3000 Minnehah t Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 613 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT BY BLOCK Run date: 3/23/2014 Date range: 1/117012 through 5828014 Cell count: 170 Pct 5 3700 BLOCK OF NICOLLE'1' Dateldme Address Problem Dlaposition Cases ApLWlr, 71742012532,42 PM 3700 NICULLBT AV Miscellaneous Information 12- 230241 128/ 13 5:44:9 PM 37011 NICOLI.ET AV Walk Through a Building AD OK 13. 026058 21128013 12.03_15 PM 3700 Nit'OLL[T AV On Site 13-04DIDS 3/120134:53:09 PM 3700 NICOLLET AV Theft Rep rs 111160.1N 3117/2 0 1 3 9:13:41 AM 3700 NICOLLEY AV Property Damage Accidem Tagged 13.090l" 12PJM13 437:00 AM 1700 kX)LI.ET AV Burglary Buttons -Rupon Report 13.400558 nrar101 3 3-3113AAM 37061,4IC'OL11•TAV Check the Welfare Roport 13. 423135 105 1/15014 8:41:17 PM 3700 NIC'OLLL•-1' AV Suspicious Person Sent 14.015532 3!621)148:27:42 AM 370( NIC'OLLET AV Bushmu(Tcek 19-039096 212317 -D14 4.10:49 PM 1706 NICOLLET AV Parking Problem Ioscrvive 14.058786 41412012 6:00:11 AM .• 3701 NIVOUST AV Cheek Ow Welfare 12.1110116 203 SR- 10126:31.00 AM 3701NICOLI.FTAV Burglary DwingInPraarea Assist 11- 137181 - 712S/:013 12023'. AM 3701 N1(:OI.I.FT AV Suspicious Person, Ropnmaud/Rcloase 12. 330676 , 2nWLDiJ 11:47:17 PM 3701 NICULLIf1 AV Audible Business Ahmn Fella 13,05M145 6/1(201149:16 AM 3701 NICOLA.Vr AV Property Damoge Aaidom Advised 13- 170533 In- 9/1013 747:21 PM 3706 NICOIJ.F:T AV SaWtims Vehicle Report 13. 027239 In92Dt3 7.48:12l PM 37W NIVOLLET AV Suspicious Person Rcpon 13427240 711019113 1.14.9 PM 1706 N1CC31.I.Cr AV Suspicious Peron Inlbnnaurm 13.210614 216DO14 1091:15 AM 3706 NICOLLLR AV Property Damageflih fi Run No Service 14-039179 1116n-014 11.77.43 PM 3706 NI('OLLET AV Sus icious Vehicle All OK 14-08461 2 112112012 1:53:9 FM 3710 NICOMFiiT AV Neighbor Trouble Assisi 12.019887 320 /30 1/1312 4:56:07 AM 3710 NICOU.BT AV Auempled Suicide Roport 12. 021313 205 2/90013 438:34 PM 3710 NICOLLLMAV Unknown Trouble Assist 12- 039478 - 3 /11/2012x18:11 PM 37IONICOl.iXrrAV UnknoxnTroubic Booking 12-071264 4/42012 2:12:41 AM 3710 NICOLL t(T AV Suspicious Person Booking 12- 100047 41412013 7.09.•74 AM 3710 NICOLLUT AV Check the Welfare Inlbrmauon 17- 100112 202 4/13-7012 436:10 PM 3710 NICDI.I.wr AV Assault In Progress Advised 12.1 10273 5,112012 1:18:30 AM )710 NICOLJ.IiT AV Suspicious Person Report 12 -1 53227 6/152012 2:36:30 AM 3710 NICOI.I.F.T AV . Assault in Progress Report 13. 182996 306 WSW Ill 13:0039 PM 3710 NICOLLF,T AV Domestic Advised 12. 231031 320 11114170129.16:35 PM 37:0 NICOMET AV Assault Report Only Caned 12. 25591 -7 219 81:91'01: 10.16:57 AM 37101,111COLUff AV Miardlamovs Inscrvice 11. 172944 82921112 1106.01 AM 3710 NICYUJ.RT AV Attempt Pick -UP 12.272WI 829/7011 12.•52:48 PM 3710 NICO4.IXT AV Suspicious Person Canal 12. 273107 9&2012143:31 AM , 3710 NICOL.I.F.T AV Ds=gte Prepaty4n PnsV%ss Information 12- 284056 111152012 6.32:12 PM 3710 NICOLLUT AV Domonk Advised 12.325345 203 1b 201212.32.1101 AM 3710141COLUMAV Suspicious Person Sent 12. 375275 1 J92D135:33:43 PM 3710 NICOLLLrr AV Unknown Tratible Cencel 12- 378890 12mr012.134:39OM 171x1NWOLJ•L• -r AV 0 wealth; Abuse Report Only Report 12- 37939 -1 205 I2/IW2Dl2 12:24.82 PM 3710 NICULLET AV Domenic Abuse -In Progress Advised 12 179415 205 1/172013 1:40:00 AM 3710 NI(1:)I,LL7T AV Annuli in Progress - 'transport 13424788 7119 -OU 7:21:17 PM 3710 NICOLLEI' AV Domestic Abusa-1n Progress Refused 13.04S730 322013 9:18:54 AM 3710 HICUL1A -ST AV Misrellaneous Adviser) 13-061258 31412013 3:51:51 PM 3710 NICOLIAT AV Sinpieioio Vehicle 13.063679 3172013 10.41:16 PM 3710 NLCOUAT AV Miscellaneous Information 134)67593 41+13113154.51 PM 3710 NICOULT AV Miscellaneous Repo" 13.097SO 4AW2013 6:37:51 PM 3710 NICOL.LIRT AV Neighbor Tgoubte Advised 13.107005 )02 SPW-01312.•1b:111 AM 371DNICOI4.ETAV Pigta Assisi 13.1630.17 81820131238:32 PM 3710 NIMILLRT AV Domestic Abu »In Pmarrls Assist I3. 258755 304 I WI20I) 5:54:;16 PM 3710 NICOLIAq AV Assatill in Progress Advised 13_r_1059 207 10132011 1.04:02 AM 1710 NICL3UXT AV Burglary Biz -In Progress False 13. 326181 1211020131.11.17 I'M 3710NICOL.LITAV Domestic Sent 13.909692 211 12412013 x.30.90 PM 3710 NICOI.I.FT AV CuttumerTiouble Report 13.422822 12292011121.08 AM 371011ICOLL.FTAV Persontddia Qum Aaat)t 13.410014 122 9120131:01:1.1 AM 3710 mcciLL [T AV Siatpiciuut Vehicle Repon 13 4101145 10120141:01:04 PM 1710NIVOI.I.BTAV TcnwTrrublc 14 -0324W 317 2/12014 7.24:52 AM 3710 NICOUBT AV Unweaned Person Sam 19. 0)5741 ;11 7/201943(r45AM )710NIV014.rTAV Unweaned Person Gone on Arrival 14. 031938 21172014 5'04:00 AM 3710 NICOLLELT AV Unvrained Perwa Sign (4. 031940 3/IC014 2.27:04 PM 3710 NICOI.LFT AV Domestic (lone on Arrival 14-065652 106 )rwoI47.4629AM 3710 NICOLUrr AV Assmdr Repon Only Report 14. 072326 4/52014 11 38:18 PM 3710 NICOUXT AV DomWle Abuse -In Progress Refused 14. 100433 308 4182014 10.59:53 PM 3710 NICOLLF.T AV Domestic Abuser Repon Only lartimaation 14. 113191 306 41912D14 10.41;51 PM 3710NICOI.IXrAV Domestic Advised 14. 114559 4111jr1D147.47.16PM 371(INIC'OIAITAV Then - Report Only Repo" 14.117?15 310 d1122014338.46AM t710wwotjArrAV Domestic AMOK 14.1 21441 300 411 ?2014 2:70:46 PM 3710 NICOIJXT AV Pnipe"y Owinyonlit & Run Gone on Arrival 14.124563 4121r7014 7.58.17 PM 3710 NICOLLET AV Assault in PmWea Uoue on Arrival 14 -1)UM 4- 1712014 5.S8:41 PM - 37101,1ICOLLETAV 'lle4 Advised 14.131243 20. Page I nf3 Pa S 3700 BLACK 01) NICOLLET DateMmu Address Problem Disposition Case AptJFtr. 429h- 141D21d)3 PM 3710NIC)IMMAV Fight Gone on Arrival 14.140052 5112=14 11744:02 AM J7ID NICOLLF1' AV Damage Progeny -Rpt Only kepon 14.150.147 -1121151-2013 11:39:36 AM 3711 NICI.LerAV UrrAwed Person Toned E•3 11110M1.7 8 3710) PM 3714 NICOLLUT AV Distuilumeu Advised 12.25721 I 9//1111:013 11. ^_9:16 PM 3716 NICOUXT AV Suspicious Person All OK 13.303089 5212012 11.09.50 AM 3717 NIC0l1JSl' AV Properry Damme/1Id & Rim Rcpon 12. 153770 IWDD01212:05.01 9M 3717 NIC -ULLer AV ThcA - RiPur Only Report 12.346852 SN12014 )6:37.21 PM 3717 NICOLLFTAV ITglm Transport 14.1$3320 6192013 6:04:01 PM 3719 Nicom fr AV Damage hcperlyIn Progress Orate an Mivul 13 181006 1 1/1/20 37 11.2219 AM 3724 NIC'0LtXT AV HMLW Dwlag• R.r{mn - Report 13366E6u +J1420138:05.13PM 3725 NICOLIAT AV Ovenluse•Aaidemel(El Report 12 -054612 4M/2012 8'06.19 PM 3725 NICOI.IJ1r AV Burglary Owing • Repon No Service 12- 123119 OWN 3/42013 104:18 PM 3725 NICOLLer AV Suspicious Person Information 12.134622 52M01210:26.3.1 AM 3725 NICOLLUT AV Domestic At". Repon Only No Service 12- 163949 513112111213,3911 PM 3723 NICOLLLT AV AuniTheR No3ervice 1 3-165137 4412012 8:33:38 PM 3725 NICOUAT AV Burglary Dw)ny - Report Report 12- 166699 M20176.53:38 PM 3775 M(X%A.Ef AV Auro Then Assisi 12.169149 6192013 11.47:39 AM 3725 NICOLLE'f AV Unwanted Person Gone on Arrival 12- 176092 UPS 71102012 B:IXy.30 PM 37-15 NICOLLIfr AV Cu3tomor Trouble Sons 12- 213638 7.112DI74d10:49 PM 3735 NICOLIXT AV BuritIorr IWAS- Repel ReimmamVRekaso 12-11036 71912,012 6:56:07 PM .1715 NICOLLET AV Burglary Dwing •. Repon 12-223753 8/112013 1:51:2/1 PM 3725 NIC'OLLET AV Burglary Dwing In Progress Booking 12 -251M 2 8/112013247.31: PM 37_5 NIMIJ-PT AV Burglary Dwing In Progress Report 12- 251998 8!102013 4.58 :45 PM 372S MCOLI.I T AV Attempt Pick -Up No Service 12.203()(X) 82112012 1:51 :53 PM 3725 NICOLI.ET AV Burglary Owing In Progress All OK 12.2639M 822201: 9211213 AM 173 NlrOUXT AV Attempt PrkAJP Report 12•264778 B2,4/MI24"54.4D PM 3735 N1(rolJk'I'AV Then Rpmn 12.267667 9/122012 11 1W.2-7 AM 373 N11'OLLET AV _ Suspicious Vehicle Cancel 12.289389 - 9202012 5:4031 FM 3775 NICOLLHT AV Attempt Pick-Op Crone on Arrival 12- 306913 %(420)2 10.07 3.1 AM 3725 NICOLLET AV Burglary Dwlrtg Its Progress Gotta on Arrival 11.30900 10231012 )0.34.)6 PM 3725 NI('01JXT AV ProvAcr - Ourro on Arrival 12412888 101152012 6.4519 PM 3725 NICO1•I.ET AV 'trespass in Boarded Dwell Assist 12- 373351 10120012 3 33:24 PM 3725 NICOLLET AV FtwUlmy Biz - In Progress All OK 12. 336239 S192014830C26 PM 3775 NICOLIXT AV Kid Trouble Canal 14. 153052 571320145:70.27Phi 3725 NICOLLUT AV Drittobanoo Gone onAniv41 14.158117 62120129101;40AM 37.- 5NIC00ATAV Threats Report 12.190206 OWN 913/2013 3:19:50 AM 3726 NICOIJ.F-T AV Unwanted Person Gone on Arrival 13. 351174 ON 813f_r013 4 41:23 AM 3726 NICOLI.EI' AV Damp Pmperry -In Progress Report 13.351198 Al ON V17h-812813101�AM 37311NIC'OLLL'TAV Prupeity Dariagr9Ril S Rua, Repur. 12.0711330 5117r.012 02CW1'M 3733 NIVOILET AV Theft - Report Oaly Report 12- 149036 612+-112 7.5!1.57 Phi 3733 NICOLLET AV Suspteiuua Person Sent 12.167913 314 201 2 6 39.21 PM 3736 NIC'OLLICT AV Remove Proprpom Sia=km RdmeJ 17-063529 IQIh•.0133-51:54 PM 3740NICUtJ.ETAV Then Information 12.019994 11=1310:13.44 AM 3740NK'OLLFTAV SuspiciousVowc Towed 12- 247990 8/18201210.53:41 PM 3740NICOLLh'TAV Suspicious Vohido Sent 12-261259 2/4!:(1111330 :11, AM 374DMCOLIATAV Suspicious Vehicle All OK 13.63475 4320131• "A:40 PM .1740NIC'OLLCTAV Retrieve Propmam Situation Advised 13-098761 (4182(113 9.54:02 AM 3740 NICOIJJrT AV Walk Thrmtgh it building Inscrvrco 13. 205540 IVI420132:41.23PM 3740NICOLIXTAV .CustomorT4W61e Advised 1341431) I VI412013 4:06:25 PM 7740 NICOLLIiT AV Customer Trouble 13414258 12220I210:38:53PM 3743NlCOL .rAV Music -laud Advisnl 12.031175 2h.3/91126-57-17 PM 3143 NK'GLIET AV Domestic Abuse Report Only Report 12193467 3 SM120129504:28 AM 3743NICOLLE:TAV Burglary Business - Repon Report 12- 136261 8/112012 4;08:12 AM 3743 NIC'OI.LI:T AV Attdihlc Ousinas Alarm Report 12-251562 8232012 9:18:44 PM 3743 NICOUXT AV Domestic All OK 12- 266791 3 6/1321113108:29AM 3743 NICOLIXT AV Audible Biomass Alarm False 1."8573) IW1220331` :3124 AM 3743 NICOLLET AV SuspictousVehide Advised 13.338496 Ilh_CY20138:19.43 PM 1743 NICOLLET AV RobberyofP9non Assisi 13.431454 3h32U12T29:4UPM 1145NICOLLEI'AV Theft Report 12 -OBBWI 413120 1 3 9.45:07 AM 3745 NICOLIXT AV Damage Propery -Rpt Only Ripon 12.11013811 5152D14�9.17.I8A4 3745 NIC'OI.LLT AV Recover Property Report )4- 147034 42M012 8:44 :14 11M 3749 NICUTA -1 - -T AV Unsettoe Donness All OK 12- 121886 1118/'_013 3411 •SO AM 3751 NICOLIXT AV Assvuh in Progress 'fagged 13 -011.139 4 612IV2013 12111:13 i'M 3751 NIC0I.IJ111' AV Then • Rrport Only Report 13- 195(!(81 2/112012 5.06.19 PM 1756 NIC'OLLFT AV I''*. Cmo:d 67111162 5119120t2 &01114 PM .1756 NIl'OLLL• rAV Unweaned Person Sum 12.151988 7/420124.11: IC PM 3756141C'OI.I.LTAV Walk Through a Bmldmg All OK IJ- 206757 8/I420128.0IC16 PM 3756141COLLETAV Mrscelleaeous 12- 255833 3/22113 12:47.27 PM 3756 NICDI.LRT AV Suspicious Person Advised 13-06140& 51142013 S:30;i0 PM 37S6 NICOLIXT AV llnwanlyd Person Umm on Arrive 13.148561 7!.12013 4:19;24 AM 3756 NIC'OLIAT AV Audible Business Atom - Cancel - I3 -^- -11693 8/12013 4:99 :53 M5 1756 NIC'UI.IXTAV AudaW Burimw Aldo Report 13.248380 8016/]013 3:50:42 PM 3756 NICOLI.FI AV Threats Advised 13.20291 12N26139:21:01'PM 3756NIC'01JXTAV RubbtayorUi.InPmgress Report d3. 909053 121162013418'OII'M 3756NI('01.I.FTAV Audible Business Alarm AMOK 13- 416380 I2116121PI8:13:56PM 3756NICOI.I.f;TAV AmdibloOwmess Alarm False 13 -416644 1211720130:06'' -) AM .1736 NICOLLET AV Audible Businus Abatis Pulse 13. 417089 121182013 6:25:16 AM 3756 NIVOLIXT AV Audible Bwincss Almm False 13- 418375 12110201311:1311 PM 37S6NIC'OLLVI'AV Audible Business Alarm Assist 13420461 Page 2 or3 Parklawn East & West Association 4351 and 4401 Parklawn Avenue, Edina; MN 55435 To IVlayor"Jim�Hovland; City Council Members; Parks & Recreation Director, Ann Kattreh; City Manager,-Scott Neal From: Association Board President, Dennis Campbell and Association Board Members Date: June 9, 2014 Re: Fred Richards Golf Course repurposing project We represent 59 condominium owners who reside in 2 buildings along Parklawn Avenue.. As.a whole,: our owners have voiced concerns regarding the future use of the lands that currently comprise the Fred. Richards Golf Course. Thank you for the opportunity to communicate these concerns to you in this letter. It is our hope that we are contributing something of value to the discussion. The part of the golf course that sits directly on Parklawn Avenue is the parcel that we are most interested in preserving as green space. We would like to see the unique features that make this, land so beautiful remain in the final plan for the new park, including.the retention ofthe water features and the bridge on the ninth hole of the golf course. As residents, we are distressed at the prospect of losing the only green space that exists along this segment of the Parklawn corridor. We encourage you not pave this area for parking or driveway access for any future amenities. One reason being is that Parklawn Avenue already sees a large volume of automobile traffic due to numerous multitenant buildings.. Anymore traffic could result in a safety hazard for the neighborhood children. Related to that concern, we urge you not sell or lease this land to developers to build yet another condominium or apartment building. In so doing, we believe the city would lose an opportunity to create not just a beautiful park but also a beautiful neighborhood. Edina is a city of neighborhood parks and playgrounds, and the children that live on this street are in need of a safe, unpaved play area. Please consider designating land that is not directly adjacent to the street as a playground. Adding landscaped gardens and walking paths into the park from Parklawn Avenue would provide safe and convenient access for children and parents,alike. We thank you for listening to our concerns and ideas for the future of this parkland. We view this as an exciting opportunity for the city to meet the needs of the local residents while creating a legacy in the form of a beautiful multiuse park. Sincerely, Dennis Camp I Board President Parklawn. East.& West Condominium Association June 6, 2014 Mayor Hovland and City Councihnembers City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 . Re: Proposed Re- zoning of 3360 W. 66`h Street Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: We are Step By Step Montessori Schools. We are one of the largest Montessori School organizations in the United States. We operate 8 Montessori Schools and Child Care Centers in the Twin Cities and serve about 1200 children. We are not a franchise; we are locally owned and operated. We operate a location for the residents of Edina at 6519 Barrie Road. Step By Step has been in this location for 22 years and under prior ownership a Montessori School has served the residents of Edina in this location since 1973. Step By Step has owned the building since 1993, we invested in the area when many would not and we have continued to make significant investment in the area to ensure that residents have an exceptional school to bring their young children. When deciding to invest in the area much of our decision was predicated on the zoning laws in the area, typically we do not operate our centers in residentially zoned areas. At that time we felt very comfortable making our investment based on the stated direction by the city of Edina. Currently we serve approximately 150 children age six weeks through six years in this location. Approximately 88 of those children and their families are current residents of Edina. Over the years we've prepared thousands of children in Edina for a lifetime love of learning. We have become a trusted partner for providing high quality early education for the children in the community. For decades we have watched the growth and improvement of this area, largely due to the city's focus on maintaining a regional medical district. We hope you and the City Council will continue to place a premium on maintaining the integrity of this medical district. We urge the council to deny any request to rezone the property, located at 3360 66h Street West (currently TCF Bank), to allow for a multi- family supportive housing project for displaced young adults. Just to provide you a frame of reference, our school is located Northeast of the TCF Bank building approximately 100 yards from the middle of the current TCF Bank parking lot to our front door. We are opposed to the rezoning for the number of issues this presents to the existing members of the community. The obvious one is parking. There are already severe limitations in parking and changing the zoning to allow for a residence will only exasperate the problem. Our experience shows that parking is always an issue, especially when working with an existing footprint; please do not underestimate the increased traffic brought to this small area by this project no matter what kind of estimates are provided, estimates are usually wrong. Secondly, being a business owner and taxpayer in the city of Edina for over 22 years we are concerned about the rezoning from commercial to residential districts. Ultimately this erodes the tax base in the city and decreases revenues for the City. Eventually this inevitable shortfall will fall to the existing taxpayers to shoulder the burden of the Administration office: 4355 Highway 169 a Plymouth, NIN 55442 e 763 - 557 -6777 1 School Locations: Edina- Southdale • Brooklyn Park • Chaska • Corcoran • Maple Crave • Plymouth • St. Anthony e Wiyzata- Ilidgedale Mayor & Councilmembers June 6, 2014 Page 2 difference. Finally, we are also concerned about the new uses and incompatibility this new zoning presents to child care centers. We feel this is completely incompatible with current zoning. Ms. Blons has stated this project will be similar to their existing housing project located on 3710 Nicollet Ave. Based on Minneapolis Police reports there were 51 responses by Mpls Police over a 21 month period at this address. Calls ranging from fights, assaults, domestic abuse, person with a gun, theft,'property damage, etc. I've attached a copy of this report for your information. This seems like an excessive number of calls and leaves us with lots of unanswered questions regarding the impact to the children in our program and the impact this has on prospective parents wishing to enroll their children in our program. We attended the City Council meeting on May 2&. It was somewhat surprising to hear many in the council voicing such strong support during a sketch plan meeting. It certainly sounds like the council's approval is just a foregone conclusion and the public's input would merely be a formality. I was also very surprised to hear Ms. Blons talk with such conviction that she had talked to her neighbors regarding the project. We were equally disappointed at the public comments fiom Beacon Interfaith on reaching out to neighbors and members of the commmunity. We have received no such communication; so it appears Beacon is already cutting corners in this process. Where else can we expect them to cut comers? Step By Step deals with a family's most precious assets. Many prospective parents hear that a project like the proposed one is coining to the area and their imaginations conjure up all kinds of scenarios of how their children will be impacted, mainly adversely impacted, whether realistic or not does not matter. We have already had a couple comments from prospective parents asking if we were aware of the project. Needless to say they did not enroll their children at just the mention of someone running a supervised facility for teens in the area. We remain opposed to the rezoning of this area outlined above; we were shocked• and appalled to hear that a facility serving young adults would not be supervised 240 especially after receiving the police report. We certainly applaud your leadership in trying to support teens in transition and for finding an appropriate site where everyone in the community can embrace these young adults and support them as they work to become self - sufficient adults. Sincerely, Ro :Mnor President Step By Step Montessori Schools 6519 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 763 -557 -6777 CC: Sen. Melissa Franzen 651- 296 -6238 sen.melissa.franzen@senate.nm Rep. Paul Rosenthal 651- 296 -7803 rgQ.paul.rosentha1@house.mn Rep. Ron Erhardt 651- 296 -4363 rrp.ron erhard1@house.mn Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERYICE REPORT BY BLOCK Run date: 523 /2014 Date range: 1 /12012 through 5222014 Call count: 170 Pct 5 3700 BLOCK OF NIC CILLET Dateltime Address Problem Disposition Case# ApUFIr. 7/24/2012 5:52'42 PM 3700 NIC ULLFT AV Miscellaneous Information 12. 210241 I68f2013 5:44:09 PM 3700 NICOL.LFT AV Walk Through a Building All OK 13. 0276058 V1212013 12:03:35 PM 3700 NICOLLET AV On Site 1 3- 0407 05 3/12013 4:53:09 PM 3700 NICOLLFT AV 'Theft Report I3- 060.119 327/2013 9:13:41 AM 3700 NICOLLET AV Property Damage Accident Tagged 13.090164 12P-M 134:57:00 AM 3700 NICOLIxr AV Burglary Business - Report Report 13400558 I:f24C013 330:04 AM 3700 NI('OLLhT AV Cluck the Welfare Report 13- 425135 105 1/1 5200 4 8:41:17 PM 3700NICOLL.ETAV Suspicious Person Sent 14. 015532 2162014 8 :27:42 AM 3700 NICOLLET AV Business Check 14- 0.19096 2f±3ft014 4.10:49 PM •1700 NICOLLET AV Parking Problem Inservice 14. 058786 4/420126:00: 11 AM 3701NIC'OLLErAV CheckthrWclfare 12.100116 202 517x012 6:51:00 AM 3701, NICOLLFT AV Burglary Dwing In Progress Assist 12- 137.181 7252012 12:02:52 AM 3701 NIC:OI.L ET AV Suspicious Person Reprimand/Release 12- 2.30676 'J20f'.AIS 11:4737 PM 3701 NICOLLET AV Audible Business Alarm False 13 -050345 6/12017 9- .09:16 AM 3701 NICOLLET AV Property Damage Accident Advised 13. 170533 1/292013 7.41:'+? PM 3706 NICOI.I.F:T AV Suspicious Vehicle Report 13. 0272.39 112921113 7.48:13 PM 3706 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Person Report 13.037240 7/162013 134-09 PM 3706 NIC01.1-Er AV Suspicious Person Infonnatrlm 13. 220614 2/612014 10:01:15 AM 3706 NICOLLL•"I' AV Property Damage/Bit & Run No Service 14- 039179 3/16201411.27.43 PM 3706 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Vehicle All OK 14-084610 1/21/2012 1:53:39 PM 3710N1COIA.F.TAV NeighborTrouble Assist 12. 019887 320 1/2320124:W07AM 3710NWOLL.ETAV AttempicilStrie.de Report 12.0:1313 20 2192012 9.38:34 PM 3710 NICOLLEI' AV Unknown Trouble Assist 12. 039478 Y1120120,18:11PNI 3710NICOIAXrfAV UnknownTrotub!e Booking 13 -071NM 4/420122:12:41 AM 37 IQ NICOLLET AV Suspicious Person Booking 12 -IW047 4142012 7.09:34 AM 3710 NIC:OLLET A V Check the Welfare Information 12 -100122 202 4113/30124:56:10 PM 3710NiCOLtx'rAV Assault In Progress Advised 12- 11(1272 52120131:18:30 AM 37 10 N ICOLIXTAV Suspicious Person Report 12- 153227 6/15/2012 236:50 AM 3710 NICOLLET AV Assault in Progress Report 12. 182496 300 7/25/2012 12:00.59 PM 3710 NIVOLLF.T AV Domestic Advised - 12.2'1108; 3:0 IV 1412012 9.16:35 1!!v1 ?7:0 N I L OI.LET AV Assault Report Only Clinch 12- :35927 219 829/z012I0•!6:57AM 3710N!COLLCTAV Miscellaneous Inservicc 12372944 829/_+012 11:0601 AM .1710 NICOLLET AV Attempt Pick -Up 12- 212991 829/+1112 12:52:48 PM 3710 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Person Cancel 12-273107 9/8.20123 :45:51 AM 3710NIC'I:LIATAV DsmaeeProperty -bat Progress Information 12- 284656 10115!2013 6.32:12 PM - 3710 NICOLLFT AV Domestic Advised 12..r-"46 205 I ',/620121 3'32.00AM 37101,1ICOLLETAV Suspicious Person Sent 12- 375275 1219/2012 5:33 :41 PM 3710 NIC'OI.LBT AV Unknown Trouble Cancel 12- 378890 12/912012 5 34:79 PM 1710 NICOLLET AV Domestic Abuse Report Only Repo" 1337884' 205 1?/102012 12:24.32 PM 3710 NWOLLLT AV Domestic Abuwln Progress Advised 12- 379415 2D5 12320131:40:00 AM 3710NICOLLL•-1'AV Assault in Progress 'rranspon 13.0247811 2/162013 7:23:17 PM 3710 1,11001.I2T AV Domestic Abuse -In Progress Re!5sed 13.1145750 32/3013 9:18:54 AM 3710 NIC'OLL1il' AV Miscellaneous Advised 1 "61258 �^ r� / 314201. 13:51:51 P M 3710 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Vehicle 13- 065679 ✓ / 31713013 10:41:16 PM 3710NICOL.ATAV Miscellaneous Information 13- 067593 4/5013 2:59:51 PM 3710 NIC'01•LEr AV Miscellaneous Report 13- 097543 ^a / 610 /3113 637:51 PM 3710 NICOLLET AV Neighbor Trouble Advised 13 -107906 302 5h_62D1312:36:31AM 3710NICOLLITAV Fight Assist 13. 163037 8,'812013 6:58:32 PM 3710 NI(l)LLET AV Domestic Abuscln Pnegrrss Assist 13-251355 304 10/12013 5:54:36 PM 3710 NI('0I.LLr AV Assault in Progress Advised 13- 3-4359 207 10/3/2013 104:02 AM 3710 NIC'OI.I.F.T AV Burglary Biz- In Progress False 13.326482 ;2fl(02013 1. 11.17 PM 3710 NICOLI.IT AV Domestic Still 134096sf` 211 12.r2 1601 3 9:30:D0 PM 3710 NICIOLI-ET AV Customer Trouble Report 13-4_2822 12/!9201.1 2.21"08 AM 3710 NICOL I.P'r AV Person with a Cow Asiop 13.410014 I^12sY11113 3:01:13 AM 3710 NWOLL ST AV Su3pioiuuv Vehicle Report I:tA3DD45 IAI /2014 1:01:04 PM 3710NICOI -.LEf AV Tenant Trouble 14- 0322484 312 2/3!2014 7.24:52 AM 3710 NIC'OLLEr AV Unwamld Parson Sent 14- ([15703 2/171'1014 4:56:45 AM 3710 NIC01.1.r:T AV Unwanted Person Gone on Arrival 14- 051938 2/172014 5.04:06 AM 3710 NICOL LET AV Unwanted Person Sent 14 -051940 3110014 2.27:04 PM 3710NIC'OI.LF.T AV Domestic Gone on A"ical 14- 065652 306 V111_014 2.46.29 AM 3710 1,111761.E1' AV Assault Repot Only Report 14 -072.326 4/56014 11 38:18 PM 3710 NICOLIXT AV Domestic Abuse-in Progress Refused 14.4094.12 308 4/82014 10.59:53 PM 3710 NICOLLEf AV Domestic Abuse Report Only Information 14- 113191 306 41917.0141R41:51PM 3710NICOLI.ETAV Domestic Advised 14. 114559 4 /II ri1147,47.30 PM 3710144C'OLLI•:T AV '11xn -Report Only Repo" 14- 117235 310 4/1 o/1- D14338.46 AM 3710141CYux' rAV Domestic All OK 14.1 21441 306 41172014 2:30:46 PM 3710 NICOL.I.ET AV Property Damagu Alit 8: Run Gone on Arrivul 14. 124563 4246044 7.58.17 PM 3710 NICULLFT AV Assault in Progress Goric on Arrival 14- 130664 42J30145,58:41I'M 37I(INIC'OI.1.P.TAV 'I1meR Advised 14 -131243 2112 Page I of Pct 3700 UI.0(X OF NICOI.I.E Date/time 429 /201410 :21:05 PM 5 /1 UN) 141U,44:02AM Address 3710 N1('OI.I.FITAV 3710 AV Problem Fight Damage Prupeny-Rin Only Disyosition " Gone on Arrival Report Case 9 14.1400.5 14- 156347 AplJPlr. 2/1 !2012 11:39:36 AM 3711 NI('OIJ.P.'1' AV Unwanted Person Tagged 12- 392650 8/15/ -017, 8 37,11) PM 3714 NICOUXT AV Distml+ance Adv'swl 13. 257211 9!242012 11.!9:16 PM 3716 N1001 -LET AV Suspicious Person All OK 12. 303089 521/2012 11:09.50 AM 3717 NICOLIrI' AV Property Damalte/FI it & Run Rcpon 12. 153570 It17W2011 12:05.04 PM 3717 NICOLLUT AV Thcfl - Report Only Report 12. 3470852 992014 10:37.21 PM 3717 NIC'OLLLT AV Fight Transport 14453220 W9 /_013 6:04:01 PM 3719 NIC'OLI.L•T AV Damage Piopeny -In Progress Gone on Anival 13 IBM% 11/312013 11.27 19'AM 3724 NIC'OLLL-f AV Burglary Owing- Report Rcpan 13- 3667,60 2442012 8:05.12 PM 3725 NIC01.I.r :1' AV Overdose- Aecidonial IF,) Report 12- 054622 4242012 8.00'19 PM 3725 NICOI LFT AV Burglary Dw1ng- Report No Servtee 13. 123119 VWN 5142012 10:34:18 PM 3725 NICOLLLI' AV Suspicious Person Information 12. 134613 5130!_'012 1/226'33 AM 3725 Nl('OL1.LiT AV Domestic Abuse: Report Only No Service 12-163841) 5/31/201212.39,-il PM 3735 NICOLLET AV Auto Theft No Service 12. 165132 (41/2012 8:35:58 PM 3725 NICOLLFT AV Burglary Owing - Repoli Kellort 12- 166699 6A120116.53:38 PM 37 ?5 NIVOl.l.lsr AV Auto Theft Assist 12.169('49 00/92013 11.47:29AM 3725 NICOLLLT AV Unwanted Person Gone on Arrival 12476092 11PS 7/102012 8:00- -10 PM 3725 NIC'OL.L.ET AV Customer Trouble Sou 13- 213638 7.1 Ir-012 4:00:49 PM 3725 NICOLLET AV Burglary Dwing- Rcpun Reprimand/RcIcow 12- °_14636 7!!02012 6:59:07 PM 3725 NI('OLLET AV Burglary Dwing- Report 12- 225755 8111/2012 1:51:24 PM 3725NICOLLGTAV Burghtry DwingInPn'gres3 Booking 12- 251840 2 8/11/2012 2 47.51 PM *4 r5 NICOI,I.FT AV Burglary Dwing In Progress Report 12- 251888 B20/2GI24.58:45I'M 3725NlC0t•I.11.TAV A(temptPick -Up- Nu Service 12.263WO 8/_41/.,7121:5):5_'PM 3725NICOLLFTAV Burglary DwingInProgress All OK 1:263X19 822/701= (('09:13 AM 1735 NICOLL T AV Attempt Pock -ttp Report .13.2647111 92420124'54.40 PM 3125 NI('OI.IA :r AV Then Report 12. 267667 9/122012 11:00:27 AM 3125 NI('Ol.ldil' AV Suspicious Vehicle Cancel 12 +89389 0,78r-01 2 5:41) 31 PM 3725NI('OLI.NTAV Attempt Pick -Up Gone on.Amsa) 12- 306915 9/.7012012 10.07 33 AM 3725 ,41COL.LFT A V Burglary Dv tng hi Fruitless Gmie on Arrival 12- 309(RCF 10/32012 10:34.36 PM 3725 Nl('OU.EI' AV Prowler dune on Arrival 12- 312888 1 W 152012 6:45:29 PM 3725 NIC'OLLL•T AV Trespsrs m Boarded Dwell Assist 12- 325351 10250)(2333:24 PM 3725 NICOLLET AV Rurglory Biz- In Progress All OK 12. 336234 5/9/2014 8:5(26 PM 3725 NICOLLEI' AV Kid Trouble C'ana:l 14- 153052 5/13!20)4 91170:27 PM 3725 NICOLLET AV Disturbance Gone on Arrival 14-158117 6/21/_012 9'01:40 AM 3726 NICOLLET AV Threats Repoli 12. 190206 DWN 8132013 3:29:50 AM 3726 NICOLLFT AV Unwanted Person Gone on Arrival I3. 251174 ON 813201 3 4 41:23 AM 3726 NI('OLL.Gt' AV Damage Properry -In Progress R poll 13- 251198 A/ DN 3/17!24012 8.83.01 AM .7 ?28 NKY)LI.LT AV Prupe'tp Dama6uJ1iii S Rea. Rcpu4t 13 -07F2.10 3/172012 1 72.06 PSI 3733 NI('OI,LE'I'AV TheR- Report O'dy Report 12- 149026 6PJ2012 7,50-57 Phi - 3733 NICOLLFT AV Suspicious Person Sent 12- 167913 ]/4201263925 PM 3736NICOLLETAV Retrieve PropiMum Situation Refused 17 -W3 ;29 1212012 351:54 PM 3740 NICOLLFT AV Theft Infonnalron 12- 019994 8181:01:IQ12:44AM 3740NIC'OLLETAV Suspicious Vehicle Towed 1 2-247990 81182012 10:53:41 PM 3740 NICUL.LET AV Suspicious Vehicle Sent 11- 261259 J4/20171 2'30:11 AM 3740 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Vehicle All OK 13- 033425 4211'1313 [.26:40 PM 3740 NI('UU.ET AV Retrieve Prop /Darn Stttarsm Advised 13. 098761 (421112t) 13 954:02 AM 3740 N1COId.F'r AV Walk Thr migh a Building Inservice 13- 205590 12/)4/-1013 3:41,23 I'M 3740NICDLJZ -T AV Customer Trouble Advised 13414211 12/14/20134:06:25 PM 3740 NICOLLET AV Customer Trouble 13414268 IP4'4J201210.58:53PM 3743 NICOLLET AV Music -Loud Advissl 12-1121175 2232012 6 57"17 PM 3743 NICOI.I.ET AV Domestic Abuse Relnln Only Rt.•port 12. 051467 3 993012 9:04:28 AM 3743 NICOI.I.BI' AV Burglary Business- Rcpvn Report 12- 136241 9/I In0124:08: 11 AM 3743 N I('OI.LEr AV Audible Business Alarm Report 13- 251562 81232012 9.18:44 PM 3743 N)COLLU'r AV Domestic All OK 12- 266781 3 6/132013 10:58:29 AM 3743 NICOLLET AV Audible 8usutess Alarm False 13. 185731 18/12/2013 1:33:24 AM 3743 NICOI.I.EI' AV Suspicious Vehicle Adviscd 13- 338496 Ilr -W2013 8:19:4.1 PM 1743 NICOIXGT AV Robbery of Fission Assist 13-421454 3252013 2:2740 PM 3745 NICOLLET AV 'IheR Report 12 -088901 41512013 9.45:07 AM 3745 NIC'OLIJL'I' AV Damage Property -Rpt Only Report 12.1013W 5/520140 ;17.18 AM 3745NF(Y)I.LFiTAV Recover Property Rcpon )4- 147():'4 4/33hJ) 128:44:14 PM 3749 NICOl.l.11'AV Unsecure Business All OK 12- 12(886 1/182013 3.01'56 AM 3751 NICU LEI' AV Assault in Progress 'fagged 13 -016139 4 6/2(Y2013 42.18:?'' PM 3751 NICOL.l.li'I'AV Theft - R4•pon Only Report I.1- I95(lIXl 2/11 P-012 5.06.19 PM 1756NI('OIJ.Pi'AV Fight Cancel 1 2- 04 1 1 62 510/3o12 .00.14 PM 3756NICOLLLT.IV Unwanted Person Scnl 1 ?•151988 7/4 M- 9.11:10 PM 3756 r71CU1.1.[iT AV Walk lhroagh a Building All OK I:- 206737 9(14/740179,0(1 :16PM 3756NIC'ULLeTAV Miscellaneous 12- ?55813 31212013 12.4/37 PM 3756 NICOLLUT AV Suspicioas Person Advised 13-0614118 5/14/-013 5:30:10 PM 3756 NIC'OLIXT AV Unwante4 Person Gone on Arrival 13- 148561 7/.72013 4:1%341 AM 3756 NICOLLFT AV Audible Business Alarm Cancel 13= 211692 8!12013 4:49:52 AM 375G NIC'OI.I.Frr AV Audible Business "Alarm Report 13. 248380 8116/10113:50:42 PM 3756 NICOLIZ AV 'Threats Advised 13.26829r 12/92013 9.'21:01 PM 3756 NIC'OUXT AV Rubbery of Biz In Progress Report 13.409063 12/162013418.01 PM 3756NICULL,FiI -AV Audible Business Alarm All OK 13. 416380 1/162013 8:13:56 PM 3756 NICOLI.F.T AV Audible Bu mess Alarm False 13416446 121172013 6:06 21 AM 3756 NIVOLIF.T AV Audible Business Alunn False 13. 417089 1'2/182013 6. 25:16 AM 3756 N I('01.10' AY AUdiblc Business Alarm False 13- 41IL115 1'2119201311:12'11 PM 3750 N lC(jI.Ll•-r AV Audible Business Alarm Assisi 13420461 Page 2 oF3 Heather Branigin From: Jim Stromberg. <js8778 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 6:58 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague7 @gmail.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: 3932 and 3934 West 49th street Our purpose in writing concerns the teardown and rebuild at the above address. My name is Jim Stromberg, and I live at 3930 West 49th St., in the home next door to the above referenced tear -down. The builder /owner /developer of that property had a meeting with concerned neighbors on 29 May, where he answered questions and showed us some drawings of the house plan - a .twin home. He stated at the meet with us that they had a request in for a variance, but was certain that it would be approved by the city, and they would then proceed with their plan. Today, we were able to find information about that variance request on the Edina site, that indicated a couple of things that are of concern to us. The first concern is that the plan calls for two driveways, one on each side of the building (there is presently one driveway on the west side of the present duplex). The second concern is about the square footage of the building. If we are reading the variance request correctly, they need relief of eight feet width -wise, and almost 5000 square feet of building relief. The 'need' stated is that without that relief, they would be unable to build their desired twin -home. Installing two driveways on this site will require the removal of both large front trees on the lot, as well as a line of trees along the east side. Having two drives also forces the home size to be very narrow, since I believe the city recommends about ten feet on both sides of the structure to the lot -line. With a variance of near -5000 square feet on the building itself, there will be-very little 'yard' or green space on the entire lot, nor will there be much room to hold any re- plantings of lost trees and other greenery. It seems, from Edina's own stipulations concerning buildings sites, that this plan does_not seem a good fit for the property. Perhaps a single home, or a smaller duplex -type dwelling similar to what is presently on the site, might be a better alternative. Simply stating to the city that the variance is needed or the project isn't viable does not seem to meet with the intent of the regulations. A viable project needs to fit into the space of the neighborhood property lines according to the specs of the city and said property. I urge the city of Edina to look thoroughly at the plan of the builder /developer, and then make a site -visit to the property to see exactly what will be lost if the plan proceeds with a granted variance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jim Stromberg Linda Caddy 3930 Wet 49th St. Edina, MN 55424 s8i 778na,grnail.com Heather Branigin From: Charlie Vander Aarde.<charlie@metrocitiesmn.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 20141:19 PM Cc: Alicia Brenhaug; Laurie Jennings; Patricia Nauman; Todd Olson Subject: Metro Cities Housing & Economic Development Policy Committee - Topic Solicitation Dear Housing & Economic Development Policy Committee Member: Metro Cities is in the process of preparing for this year's policy committees (Housing /Economic Development, Municipal Revenues, Transportation /General Government and Metropolitan Agencies). As a member of our Housing & Economic Development Policy Committee, we greatly appreciate your participation and service and look forward to having you participate in the work of the committee this year. As we undertake committee planning, we would appreciate your . feedback /suggestions to assist us with making sure that key topics of interest are addressed by the committee. Please take a couple moments to provide us with your responses to two questions below. You can reply to this email: 1. Are there specific topics you would like discussed in this year's committee? 2. Are there speakers you would like to address the committee this year? Also, if you: don't plan to participate in the committee process this year, please let me know. If I don't hear from you, I'll assume you plan to join us, and will send the committee information to you prior to the first meeting. As we did last year, each committee will have three meetings. Below is a schedule of our Housing & Economic Development Policy Committee meetings for this year: Friday, July 18,11:00 am —1:30 pm Friday, August 22, 11:00 am —1:30 pm Friday, September 19,11:00 am —1:30 pm Location: LMC Building, 145 University Ave W., St. Paul, MN 55103 Thanks againl We hope to see you this summer. Sincerely, Charlie Vander Aarde Metro Cities Desk: 651 - 215 -4001 Mobile: 651 - 366 -7564 @MetroCitiesMN www.metrocitiesmn.ors # �yl7Ng - Hai - D r. S Vdr —SoreKSO�rr �o �c.rca, �m%�axc� d�ciiGta�- ,tXA(M t4l '9� 1-7, -.2-0 1 0& vn,�.f k7444V a- J Heather Braniain From: Jim Stromberg <js8778 @gmai1.com> Sent. Tuesday, June.10, 2014 2:42 PM To: Cary Teague; swensonannl @gmail.com; jhovland @krausehovland.com; Lynette Biunno Subject. Thank you Last night, I sat down with Linda and sent an email to all of you concerning a proposed teardown and rebuild of a duplex next to our place on 49th Street. We are recent arrivals to Edina, having just moved in last fall from White Bear Lake. Everything I've ever heard about Edina is proving true. From the day I first walked into City Hall to take care of 'business' relative to our new address/home, I've been greeted with kindness, friendliness, and competence. I SO appreciate being treated in such a respectful manner. We are excited to be new residents of this lovely community! My reason for writing this note is simply to thank you for taking the time to respond so quickly to last evening's note that we sent to you. I am grateful for such a timely response, and appreciate your taking. time to give back some information concerning our email. I told Linda that even if things concerning the next door building do not work out the way we'd like it to - at least we know our concerns were heard by our local public officials, and that consideration was at least given them. One cannot ask for more! Thank you again! Jim Stromberg Linda Caddy 3930 West 49th Street Heather Branigin From: Hensing, Kate < Kate_Hensing @cable.comcast.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:50 PM To: Edina,Mail Subject Comcast Scholarship Recognition Event You are invited to join us for the 10'h Annual Comcast Scholarship Recognition Event honoring the 2014 Leaders & Achievers Scholarship recipients. The high school student in your community who will be receiving a Leaders & Achievers Scholarship is: c -Mark Bryan 5609 Dalrymple Rd. Edina, MN 55424 Details on the event: Thursday, June 26", 2014 Saint Paul Hotel: 350 Market Street, Saint Paul, MN 55102 11:30 -Noon Comcast Recognition Event Comcast Recokniition Reception Please join us in the Summit Room for light hors d'oeuvres and awards of scholarships. Comcast Leaders and Achievers Scholarship: Scholarship recipients are high school students recognized on the basis of community service, leadership skills, positive attitude and academic achievement. The Leaders and Achievers Scholarship Program underscores the Comcast philosophy that young people should have every opportunity to achieve their potential and be motivated as catalysts for positive change in their schools and communities. Please RSVP to Kate Hensing,by Wednesday, June 18 at kate hensing@cable.comcast.com or 651- 496 -5778. If you are unable to attend, please consider sending a letter to congratulate the graduate on their scholarship. Kate Hensing Manager, Government Affairs Comcast 10 River Park Plaza St. Paul, MN 55107 Office: 651.493.5778 1 Janet Ridge 4401 Parklawn Avenue, #203 Edina, MN 55435 June 6,.2014 Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members, Ms. Ann Kattreh, and Mr. Scott Neal, Thank you for this opportunity to express my ideas for repurposing the Fred Richards Golf Course. I'm sad to see the end of this well -loved golf course, yet I'm optimistic that with so much land available, a multiuse park is a real possibility! The condo in which I live is situated directly across from the ninth hole of the golf course. This is the only green space on this segment of Parklawn Avenue; and repurposing it as a landscaped entry garden to the larger parklands would be a beautiful addition to this neighborhood. I would love to see the already existing stream and bridge worked into any future plans. I also suggest creating a neighborhood playground here as that would put it within walking distance for parents and children who live all along Parklawn Avenue and Gallagher Drive. And, placing a playground in the interior, away from the street, would increase the safety factor for the kids since Parklawn Avenue sees a lot of automobile traffic due to the high density housing. As a lifelong resident of Edina, having grown up in the Birchcrest Neighborhood and now calling the Parklawn Neighborhood my home for over 20 years, I've experienced a shift in the demographics from predominantly elderly and single residents to young families and new American citizens. I've watched children play in the streets and parking lots because they have no other. place to play. I've seen their mothers and fathers watch over them from curbside. I'm sad to know that these kids do not have a neighborhood park and therefore will not have the same experiences I had while growing up in Edina. If the city chooses to do so, just utilizing a small portion of the newly available land for a playground would greatly enhance the quality of life for this area's youngest residents. With all of the wonderful possibilities and potential for beauty, please do not pave over the ninth hole with a parking lot or road. And, please do not allow developers to build a structure of any kind on the Parklawn Avenue side of the park. As a resident of this street, I believe it is in the best interests of the neighborhood to keep the green space that currently exists. Please do not benefit the larger community at the expense of the smaller one. With such generous acreage, I'm heartened to know that the city will be able to accomplish two purposes if it chooses: to provide amenities uniquely suited for the local neighborhood and to develop features which will benefit the city as a whole such as soccer fields and baseball diamonds. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, i i Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West Fifty- Fourth Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1432 Phone: 952.926.3808 • Fax: 952.920.4418 • www.ecic.org June 8, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland & Members of Edina City Council 4801 W. 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of City Council, On behalf of Edina Community Lutheran Church, we are writing to express our support for the development at 3330 West 66th Street, which will provide much - needed affordable housing and services for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. This will be the first apartment community for homeless youth in the southwest suburbs. We know that youth homelessness is largely invisible in the suburbs, and yet we have heard countless stories from teachers, librarians, YMCA staff, and drop in center volunteers who serve Edina youth struggling with homelessness daily. It Is estimated that between 200 -300 youth are currently considered homeless in the Metro's suburban areas. We believe that high - quality supportive housing in the Southdale area will provide youth with safe housing, as well as access to jobs and transport. Founded in 1948, Edina Community Lutheran Church (ECLC) is an open, energetic and inclusive congregation of over 750 members with an historical emphasis on social justice. ECLC is a community that has discerned a mission to respond to God's call for justice. We believe that to follow this mission, we must be advocates for everyone in our community, especially for the most vulnerable. We have been a steadfast partner in various city initiatives, including the creation of affordable senior housing in Edina in the 1980s. Our congregation has been on a journey for the past three years to learn about the state of youth homelessness and its root causes. We have gathered over 175 leaders from neighboring congregations and non - profits to learn and take action and we have committed a tithe from our capital campaign to help make housing happen. We are serious and steadfast about our commitment to changing the lives of youth who struggle with housing stability in our midst. Our partner, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, has proven expertise in developing supportive housing that will be an asset to the community. Edina Community Lutheran Church is committed to our city. We believe that the city of Edina has the resources and the community passion to create a network of support that will launch these young people into successful futures. We are thrilled to welcome the youth who will live at 3330 West 66th Street as our neighbors and will remain involved in this project by participating in its governing board and through donating our time, talent and passion to enhance and support these future tenants, who are our kids and our future. Thank you for your support, 14, Pastor Erik Strand o Rn-, dye Lauren Morse - Wendt, Diaconal Minister Pastor of Mission and Vision Mission and Ministry Developer Heather Branigin From: Johnson, Aya <AyaJohnson @mail.house.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014.1:12 PM To: Johnson, Aya Subject: Public Immigration Meeting, Friday, June 13 at 11 AM Attachments: June17 GSA Stakeholder Mtg.pdf Importance: . High Hello: This Friday, Congressman Ellison, immigration advocates, lawyers and stakeholders and elected officials will meet to discuss an imminent problem facing many immigrants and refugees across Minnesota. Last fall, the General Services Administration (GSA), the federal agency that manages federal government leases, signed a lease for the new United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( USCIS) St. Paul Field Office. Despite the name, the St. Paul Field Office is currently, located at 2901 Metro Drive, Bloomington, Minnesota 55425. This location is in between the Mall of America and Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport. This office serves all of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and western Wisconsin. Many immigrants and refugees need to access the USCIS office for non - asylum appointments, to receive travel documents, emergency services, and other issue. The new location will be 9360 Ensign Avenue South, Bloomington. Minnesota 55438 which is over three miles awa from the nearest public transportation location. Any person who relies on or wants to use public transportation to go to this location will face unnecessary burdens and longer travel times. The Star Triliune has written about this problem here and here. For months since learning about this problem, a group of immigration advocates and the federal congressional delegation have been trying to work with GSA to postpone the move and find an adequate solution: GSA has admitted to making a mistake when they procured this lease, but has only had limited engagement with immigration advocates and lawyers, and local, state and federal government officials despite repeated requests for more engagement. We hope you or your staff are able to join this important meeting either in person or via phone (email communications @ilcm.org for the conference call credentials). On Tuesday, June 17 at 4 pm, GSA will hold a teleconference with updates on this move. More details are attached. What: Community informational meeting about the local USCIS office move Who: Immigration advocates, lawyers, stakeholders, and elected officials When: Friday, June 13, 2014 Where: University of Minnesota Law School, 229 - 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455, 3rd Floor Lindquist & Vennum Conference Room Why: All people should have adequate access to,government services and offices. Aya Johnson Community Representative Office of Congressman Keith Ellison (MN -05) 2100 Plymouth Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55411 Office: (612) 522 -1212 E- mail :'aya.iohnson @mail.house.gov Website: www.ellison.house.gov E- Newsletter - Twitter - Facebook - Flickr - YouTube i June 2, 2014 Dear Stakeholder: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 2901 Metro Drive, Ste., 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 .s war s US. Citizenship and Immigration Services . You are invited to a teleconference with representatives from the General Services Administration (GSA) to talk about th e new USCIS St. Paul Field Office. This teleconference will held on Tuesday, June 17, at 4:00 pm Central. The call -in information is as follows: Toll Free Number: 888 -790 -3259 Participant passcode: GSA If you plan to participate, please provide your full name and the organization you represent to USCIS via email at Outreach. SPM@uscis.dhs.gov by noon on June 12, 2014. This will help ensure we have the appropriate number of lines available. Sin ly, Leslie Tritten St. Paul Field Office Director www.uscls.gov Dear Edina City Council.member, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is, estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs. of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Of//� Sincerely Name l , Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and-supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name X ai Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 c.49 Postage required P�Be required Dear Edina. City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, �' .� �v� Name �, J,(/ n Address��, O Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Councilinember, The city of Edina.can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name— �1/l -c Address 11VO9 j A /✓. -7-V �, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required *.49 postage required '/151,V Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,.,,�;,G QV Name Address )°h,�.e��°�he�N1IV SS'37z -1336 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -ow�� - �6vt? �i 44, ,-AIE � x'96 y �- lo-r/e luda . Wllliam M. Vanbenthuyse Unit 118 7100 Metro Blvd. MtnneapOUS, MM 55439 -2106 Congregation: 600b 541A,,4 af fh -N U,% C' Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, MINNEAPOLIS � 10 JUN 2014 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ! �1r�! it�ill tf, 1. 11' Ji��iJ9.' i�Iii l�!t��!I!�!Nj!�I;�it�!��t)IFII' Name: Ms. Nancy L. VanBenthuysen Unit 118 7100 Metro Blvd Address: Una- MN 44 Congregation: � c o ��'✓lcrh�u � �GG�S Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, r ^ 4S Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,— ��`-�� Name` 'O( Address d PM Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 III , IIIIiIiInIII "IIIJILI114IIIIIIII III it 1�111i�ilit�lll�r+i�itl Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 x.49 postage nsquired Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. -On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address /LoL- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Ut OU C lIowft Ak S- �d Edina City Council . 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 PoStese required 6.49 P�9e required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Named !i Edina, MN 55424 Address I Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing' and' end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by snppo this project. Sincerely,,- �, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name �44 /N V Edina, MN 55424 Address Ii�to f c.49 postage requ'ved c.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help-suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name ell, stri t fma Edina, MN 55424 Address 6100 C k0t,/ -rte !A ve. Q,�ICI Mk . C44V tv .r� C66k Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing . homelessness by supporting this project Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address 5.49 poscase required 5.49 postage • required I Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name �g��i 1.x&04 Address Dear Edina City Councihnember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness.. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban.youth experiencing homelessness by supporting,this project. Sincerely, 4-t,4& 44KI'tS Name Address V�r e Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 s.49 rm�e requ'ved postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300.youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Nam���J l Lv A aa, 14a A hay ,,1 Nb7'/ iaPI (081 kv/ Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49' postage required postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 1 Vy Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by s porting this project. oz. Sincerely, X Name Address/ Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 i 3.49 Po�9e required 3.49 poshage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive_ housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address SOa "Y� Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerel , Name Address s 77 a.49 postage requlred Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 Page required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina. can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults: PI_� help suburban youth experiencing h elessness by supporting this project. U incerely, V4- Name c' Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help. young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,��/ Name Address 00,19 , Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ,ate. I r Edina (City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 8.49 postage required 6� postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address l— Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, b d - A5bI'O-�% Name U Qi; 61S Address k* 1 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 SM,{� `E'E`"'' I v►-�" d Ius V�� ho- 6V -'e-6> Y&4+ E-P�i9-Gd 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supportinf this proje t. Sincerely, Name ' vq l (V ?CG -i1 l V Address Dear: Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name A(1� kA M �� Address vA- j MAJI Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 $.49 postage requred •.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, j-d pre The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth axe homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66: West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. / J� /�O� T Sincerely, `�" Edina City Council � � 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address co moo, -JA� Dear Edina City. Councilmember, `49 po�tase required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. z Ape w Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name &Wp #bz AM 7`� Edina, MN 55424 Address d; 17S �� , ��r� /6 Dear Edina City Councilmember, Q _ posza9e The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 ¢a and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Henn epin _ �,�'�� �- County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults.. / - Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 6'S�6i�a� fif /ZQ� (-': W- e- �, /'I// ss`yj 5 Name:3&w AkA V� Address: �(J Congrega o Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban' youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, :�• �.:.� :a =4 :ate Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 VUMEAPOL154- 553 CQ-' .SUN- 2014'-FN 31 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 1 1iIIJ"J I1" 111111 111.111111.111111111 I I t1� I 111' �1FI�! ,�jr I 1 +�" '� j"..�� �'•' •;:•;%� s:: �� � 7f7Vf�� Name: 9 °' 1 '� f� .xk� t/� b !K 1�1 ! ,. � II i 4 es50404 oG Address: '*�O' i Vz USA - A 7' Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 1300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable acid supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street. Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN. 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, I E kld. iVame: rl lllrl "i 1! !`t�'9',s✓'�: J , i IM 6 *5-07 Address: • -'F` �.:- �'� 1,�¢ ,� C; Congregation: / spp�- wrsnv2 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, ` P C •I l M:11 WX zi Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end,homelessness. 31 MAY AMA PPI 2. L -� -Usti c FOREVER On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth, are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West,is affordable and supportive housing which wiR serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, AA Name To Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between, 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. n tj u-/Wa -6i, v J �.,,�rr"►?.J�rri a , a Sincerely, /�,,,,Q .� ,�p /� d "." a ✓l�a�'' �' Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name _���� Edina, MN 55424 SJ Address 6.49 vo�se iequired Dean Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 .West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,, ;j Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name o C0 S� X�i,.jQ!S - Edina, MN 55424 Address 5.49 postage required To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 17, 2014 Subject: Correspondence {NA, Cn O �001RIr6 x�T�� . ,998 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: No action is'necessary. Attachment: Attached is Correspondence. received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Robert J. Christianson, Jr. 23 Woodland Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 952 =920 -6107 9600 South Ocean Drive, #805 (winter) Jensen Beach, Florida 34957 772- 229 -3631 RJC23(a)AOL.Com June 13, 2014 Mr. Scott.Neal, City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50d' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Neal: As you can see, I live at 23 Woodland Road. I wrote to you last year about the condition of Woodland Road in front of my house as well as 20, 21, 22, 24; 25, 27 and 29 Woodland Road. It is disappointing to read about all of the so-called street improvements in the City and be ignored about the deplorable condition of our street. Any civil engineer with half a brain would be able to identify the fact that it is poorly designed, poorly constructed and poorly maintained. Most of us have sumps that drain on to the street leaving standing water in the multiple pot holes which are incapable of being repaired. Even when the pot holes are band- aided, the water collects on.the.road side and does not drain due to improper, drainage slopes and/or lack of storm sewer drains mi appropriate places. This is an intolerable condition and should be addressed immediately. I expect a reply other than an empty promise to "look into it ". Yours truly, Robert J. Christianson, Jr. Cc: Mayor James Hoveland, Dr. Stephen Sundberg, Mr. Thomas Halvorson, Mr. Richard Jensen, Mr. William- Goldenberg, Dr. Donald LeWin, Mr. B.J. Turner and Mr. Carl Geisz Heather Branigin From: Long, Jamie <jamie.long @mail.house.gov> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 1:31 PM To: Edina Mail; Scott Neal Subject: Congressman Ellison Meeting Follow_Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed June 13, 2014 Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina Councilmembers: I am writing to request a meeting with you in the coming months to discuss the issues of greatest interest to.Edina to provide a brief update on activities in Congress. Because I am in Washington D.C. the bulk of the year, I always look forward to opportunities to connect with the units of government closest to the community. Please be in touch with Jamie Long, my District Director, to schedule a meeting (iamie.lon>; @ mail. house.eov). I have limited availability during the evenings when I am back in Minnesota, so if possible, I would appreciate flexibility in trying to schedule a meeting in the morning or over lunch. . Best Regards, Congressman Keith Ellison Administrative Office 2610 University Avenue West Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 T. 651. 789 6260 Beacon INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE s www. beaconinterfaith. org Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing. which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Cvvt�P � T �� Address �7 �Ub Y1 j"r Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Since y� . Name -5(� � kp d NA L L Address tf D 1 E . 6 57 eVAA C Edina.City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West.is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, . Name Address S Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage requ'ved 6.49 posffige required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and endhomelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, .(�, .� h r C.y Edina City Council 1 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address a �.�Y\ 4- J 3� Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, a,9-c� Name �Na tPt BLS O Address `�- l Dq � r t tA'U E- t.3i 1 MVL5•. At nn r . fin„ Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 S,Q9 postage required postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth,are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name - Address ..5-7 q Oa-,F.eiI Avs N1,ity -e- QPe> IIrS� (317N �F vMC- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name J� /,, ,/ Address �,5 j0 I UM-1 cve , T a Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 GML 7AZ"L�� 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. 'Sincerely, Name jve AG- It (e Address 3 L %.d�.�/�� /'- K�..e��., Vt, ti Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night,. it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name jk Address ti V%t Fr-tK- r1 N S—r7 U postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina,, MN 55424 \*9 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and'end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 -West is affordable and supportive-housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name QIfl Qr �h �� /f p/1� Edina, MN 55424 Address l0 7 Lr",�F� levMe- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Q. &-7� Edina, MN 55424 Address 4v6a o," 7 •-�J h <U a3Y�s-' 8.49 postage required 8.49 copse requires Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the` suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will'serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, / '� ,,�✓ Name Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, /v! Cx Name Arn, ao d Josh, .W un+r-y rnar» Address 7Z0O /VwIS{ S Qlch�,�)d MN 66g2.3 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street N e �� Edina, MN 55424 Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council Name ��, Y) 4801 West 50th Street j 0 V L- / Edina, MN 55424 Address 2— 6t-ove �(�AA C, 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address M/�� Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 6.49 postage requ'ved Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 e0m 6 " 6.49 postage requ'ved Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 I WWmc Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address g L. �� fn ��G -To'• Anp y-3 7 UDC Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Ale, R, Address Ada X�t 6 � e11 M'4 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 6.49 postage requved Dear_ Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address A 3 l j e L) PA 0- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, f Name Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 8.49' Po�9e requ'ved 8.49 �sr�9e �q��d Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. -T7- 15 AIC';qSO F�)iz 77;e,- Yoorts -4mD 131fc-b5 4 s% Sincerely, Name Address 77 ! �' µi LA-e.-) /4v s S '4` %„r 2-3 Dear Edina City. Councilmember, The; city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. -On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name ,, � jfe4-,3 Address hAJA, 2 U M 0, - Z-Yt2s- , Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage requred Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. t wk� �s c'R,clr�',�� Sincerely, J\4 c.\ Ct c1n� �. C� Q, �q5 0r\ Name J Address 'a�-a � Qn kV Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,�A\� Name Cs Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage required 141 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, % J� Name Q Gtr , N�kS �- Addressj Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name J7-ze7 Address � 17,111W 1,n Al Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage requ'ved Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth. are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive Housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address yY1'! -e v Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. �v Address R�Me. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Oq 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of-Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Na � Address 7 !. o q ,•,,l 0,4'a- . �o . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address, S ik& IeuMC J =.49 postage requUed Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 =.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Dear Edina. City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name L %r� Address 6L Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 SA9 postage r�uired postage 2quired Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness,by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name 4At � G IUK' jf C�� Address & � 0 4&V ro nk sStf2-3 eLl M e Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage required 'A9 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of ,Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address SJ Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina. City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address .� /// ! s- *0 *1, Mf le v M, C, 5.49 postage required Name: %, vi ,� -I�` PAAuL q 1 Address �( V rL�'1 � :' L. • .ill � Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelgssness. On any,given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Avil1,,1,yfililIlII-hi fill if I fill, 111f1111 fill lift] i1,i1.1111 Heather Brahidin From: . Morse- Wendt, Lauren <Imorsewendt @ecic.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 4:56 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West endorsement from Edina Challenge Attachments: 20140606130406626.pdf Dear Edina City Council Members, Edina Community Lutheran Church is proud to share another supporter of our goal to provide long term supportive housing for formerly homeless young adults here in Edina at 66 West Apartments. Attached is an official letter of endorsement from the Edina Challenge Initiative, a consortium of leaders within Edina begun by the Edina Community Foundation. We truly appreciate the time and care that each of you are making.to listen to the voices of your constituents. We.hope this endorsement letter will further inform you of the vast support for this project across Edina. In Thanks, Lauren Morse -Wendt Lauren Morse- Wendt, Diaconal Minister Mission and Ministry Developer Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 W. 5e Street, Edina, MN 55424 (952) 926 -3808 "Like" ECLC on Facebook at www.facebook.com/edinacommuni G 0 M � ®� a -u o �. O N U M ` Latium Ax A4- Mission and Ministry Developer Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West 50 Street Edina, MN 55424 S T R E N G T H E N I N G O U R C O M M U N I T Y June 5, 2014 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAN ASMO RIIAD REARM BEANIE IIFAVIR I'll Ell DAHI RON ERHARD1 <L'ttl II(111S11 IAMI'S IIOVIAND RE: Edina Challenge Endorsement Dear Edina Community Lutheran Church: We are writing to confirm the Edina Challenge Team's endorsement of your Church's proposal for supportive housing for youth and young adults to be constructed in cooperation with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative in the Southdale neighborhood of Edina. The Edina Challenge Team identified housing as one of the top five priorities for helping Edina youth in need develop to be healthy, productive adults, and its endorsement of your project reflects its enthusiastic support for your approach to meeting that need. The Edina Challenge team, an initiative of the Edina Community Foundation, was ST E V I IJ NI( DONALD founded in response to the growing number of youth qualifying for fiee and reduced lunch in Edina. The Edina Challenge is a collaboration among many of our community rnul Moclri organizations and grant - makers working together to maximize our collective ItICHARI) tILSON effectiveness in enabling youth in poverty to participate in the community, educational, and recreational. programs that lead to success in adult life. Projects are supported BRENDA LLI)AYF through endorsement or funding; endorsed projects can be included in future applications for funding. The following community organizations make up the Edina MAMIF SI :GALL Challenge; M A X I N F WA L L I N Connecting With Kids Edina Community Lutheran Church EXE.CIITIVE DIRECTOR EdinaGiveAndGo Edina Park & Recreation Department DICK t:Rt)t I f r' EPS Community Education Services Oasis for Youth DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church Edina Community Foundation Edina Education Fund Edina Morningside Rotary Club Edina Public Schools Edina Resource Center Questscope/One20ne Southdale YMCA n•I A It S FI A R 1 u : H t) K We look forward to having the community benefit from Edina Community Lutheran Church's experience in meeting the needs of homeless youth. Sincerely, AV/ �"/p . � 4 Dick Crockett Mamie Segall Executive Director Edina Challenge Chair 5.280 G RAN DVIEW SCZUARE EDINA. MINNESOTA 55436 (952) 833 -9573 • FAX: (952) 833.9575 edfnundaliontiBci , rdina.mn.us % vwiv .edinacommunitpfoundatinn.org Heather Branigin From: Johan Rosenberg < bjrosenberg @blueroseadvisors.com> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 6:44 PM To: James Hovland Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail;'jaschoenbauer @gmail.com; keschoenbauer @gmail.com; Stacey Thiele; Winnie; jwhitemn @hotmail.com; Dana Wais; Mary Mitten; Susan Slocum Subject: Fred Richards Park - We Can Ride In Edina Municipal Park Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council' and the Schoenbauers: As you know, we presented our proposal last week at the 1t public planning meeting.I have to say it was pretty charged and not what anyone expected. Jeff and Kathy managed some very emotional people very well. We Can Ride In Edina "Municipal Park supporters represented over 50 people in the room, and we were by far the majority of people attended the meeting. The fact that the Schoenbauer's met with us earlier in the day, and our opportunity to present after everyone else had spoken, gave us the chance to introduce our proposal. Thank you! I know there were many Edina residents in our group who waited to present their point of view until after we had presented and then we simply ran out of time. That can happen. I am certain with your commitment to this public forum over the direction of the Fred — everyone will have more opportunities to share their views and .have input. happen to have quite ,a bit of experience with municipal projects and finance, having worked on over 2,000 projects /financings for school districts, cities, counties, state agencies, universities and hospital systems during the past 25 years, and so I know first -hand what a tough position government leaders sometimes find themselves in when managing.all the interests of many constituencies. Frankly, because we have a AAA city, with an improving tax base (news to me, but great news —well done I), I have no'criticism and I honestly personally would have been fine with just your internal City decisions for the Fred. So it is therefore that we commend and thank you for opening a sincere and genuine dialogue encouraging interaction with the public. Given the additional burdens of the path you have chosen, we want you to know we stand ready to "Do All the Work" to support our proposal, given the chance and time. This includes RFP preparation to solicit nationally recognized developers for a master site plan and architectural renditions, delivering a fiscally responsible budget, with a legal structure that is "off balance sheet and "off credit" for the City, and also supporting all the projected economic development gains with a feasibility study. We recognize our proposal is ambitious, but we think Edina is ready for and deserves a bold plan. Leaping to conclusions from what was presented at the meeting and in conversations with others, it seems to us the choices for the Fred appear to be 1) an Equestrian Center, 2) an Urban Farm, 3) a Sculpture Garden, 4) a Frisbee Golf Course, 5) an Open Park, or 6) Athletic Fields. Personally, I think the first three in the list are most exciting, and the last three somewhat uninspiring but arguably safe and acceptable. Many of the issues that were raised came from the neighboring residents and we are confident the Equestrian Center will bring satisfaction to about 90- 95 %.of the desires and concerns that were raised, incorporate all of the additional requests and wants, with the exception being that we probably can't satisfy the people who want athletic fields. We invite you to think about how the Equestrian Center finally responds to our underserved populations of disabled, autistic, and other people with daily challenges, in the spirit of Inclusion, weaves them together with our.mainstream populations with riding lessons for everybody and embedded with opportunities for volunteering, coupled with economic development and marketing opportunities that come with an event course. - Lastly, we think Mayor Hovland, and future mayors too, are going to. love the Equestrian Center's walking path on Saturday Mornings at 9:00 AM with its beautiful flower beds, fences and beautiful horses not only on quiet mornings, but also on event mornings when the Center is humming with exciting activity and vitality. We have spent a lot of time talking and gathering information that we want to share with the City and are available at your convenience to meet to discuss this exciting opportunity for our City. Please let us know when it is convenient for you to meet. Thank you Johan Rosenberg (Edina Resident) 4511 Oak Drive, Edina, MN 55424 B.J. (Johan) Rosenberg Blue Rose Capital Advisors, Inc. 212 - 991 -8424 (Main NY 952 - 746 -6050 (Main Mpls) 952 - 746 -6030 (Direct) 612 - 839 -7627 (Cell) birosenberg (crblueroseadvisors.com to osE ' GAF1TAL °.A.D.VJ,S:6RS Heather Branigin From: Donald Crutch <nationalpinktieorg @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 6:06 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: I would love for the City of Edina, MN to honor (Proclamation) your local chefs on Chefs Appreciation Day August 16, 2014. Attachments: Chefs City of Tucson AZ.pdf, Chefs City of Miami Gardens FL.pdf, Chefs City of Orlando FL.pdf I Good Morning Mayor James Hovland! would love for the City of Edina, MN to honor (Proclamation) your local chefs on Chef's Appreciation Day August 16, 2014. Chefs Against Cancer honors all chefs every 3rd Saturday of August each year. Attached is a proclamation from the City of Orlando, FL City of Miami Gardens, FL and the City of Tucson, AZ to use as a reference if needed. We currently have over 2000 cities participating in Chef's Appreciation Day. http: / /fb101, com/2014/05/ chefs - against- cancer - presents- chefs - appreciation - day -2/ My name is Lisa Crutch (Wounded Warrior and Veteran); I am the President of the National Pink Tie Organization. We are a 501(c)(3) non- profit Organization, National Pink Tie Organization keeps it simple. Our mission is to band men together to support the fight against cancer. Our vision is for every man to wear a pink or fuchsia tie nationwide to raise awareness, educate and empower the community about cancer. Together we are a formidable army that shows a man's compassion, caring, and perseverance to help raise funds that support prevention, early detection, treatment options and support groups of those that are diagnosed and undergoing treatment for cancer. NPTO gathers men in all areas of business and professions and tapping into their own personal interests. Men that are chefs, golfers, musicians, soccer enthusiasts, attorneys, runners, small business owners, body builders, corporate heads, fantasy football players, doctors, bikers, veterinarians, and the list goes on. These men band together as warriors to protect and provide for those impacted by cancer. It is one of the most exclusive clubs you can be a part, of. One that shows the heart of every man — it is pink and it cares. This shows the real heart of mankind. We care! 1 Please review our proclamation request and any information you may need to complete this process please call me at (407, ) 949 -1931 or my email lisacrutch@Mto.co . Thanks in advance and I look forward to hearing from you soon. To learn more about Chefs Appreciation day please read our letter below. "Chefs feed and nurture us throughout our lives. But who is therefor them when they fall Donald Crutch, Founder of the National Pink Tie Organization, Greetings! I am Donald Crutch, Founder of the National Pink Tie Organization, a 501(c)(3) non - profit, which was created for men supporting the fight against all types of cancer. ( www. nationalpinktieorganization .org) Our Chefs Against Cancer division involves over 400,000 chefs and is growing rapidly worldwide. These are busy professionals who volunteer to stand beside fellow chefs and their immediate family members who are facing one of the most stressful times in their lives. Historically, chefs have shown great compassion to others. The very word "restaurant" is derived from the French word "restaurer," which means "to restore." The first [pre- revolutionary] French. restaurants were establishments that sold meat based consommes intended to restore strength to those who were not feeling well. Few things are better for both the body and the soul than a well crafter, sublimely prepared, and lovingly presented meal. Think about the last time that you went to your favorite restaurant, ate until you were full, then leaned back, took a deep breath, and smiled with satisfaction. Naturally you expressed your appreciation as follows, "my highest compliments to the chef!" What you didn't see was how the chef beamed with joy in response. Chefs deserve our recognition and appreciation. But 2 there are times when our chef may need an extra measure of kindness. NPTO chefs have made the commitment that their colleagues will not be alone when the going gets tough. "Isaac" was a great executive chef in an excellent restaurant when-,he was r diagnosed with colon cancer. He tried to focus on the thing he loved most. "I tried to cook my way through the pain. That's what gave me the love. I needed each day. Nothing was better for me than seeing the Joy on peoples' faces as they ate my food," Isaac said. "But:°after a while; °I. just didn't have the strength to cook any more. There was no more glory, no sunshine. My life became very dark after that." As Isaac faded like a shiny red apple turning brown, so ,did the support and assistance from the restaurant and culinary community. Isaac soon passed away. Sadly, he simply did not have the resources or support to help him through his illness. He had wished to attend the Chefs Appreciation Day at least one time to meet others,who understood his challenges. Chefs and their families need us now. The National Pink Tie Organization is seeking sponsors and supporters for the Chefs Against Cancer annual Chefs Appreciation Day which is held every third Saturday of August nationwide. Chefs, Physicians, Nutritionist, and Fitness Professionals from your city would like to gather to promote healthy living and cooking, but, most importantly, to uplift one another. In the days preceding Chefs Appreciation Day we want them to continue promoting the healthy lifestyle around their local area to parents and children. On this day we'll introduce our Master Chefs Care program where chefs will share NEW recipes, discover cutting edge culinary techniques, NEW trends, and enjoy the camaraderie of fellow kitchen warriors, vendors, and food distributors. Above all else Chefs Appreciation Day is for giving back to those who have already helped so many others realize how truly wonderful a happy, healthy life can taste. *"Isaac" is a pseudonym. Personal note: NPTO is always looking to expand and be apart of your community. If you have a building you would like to donate to NPTO (We're a 501(c)(3) non profit organization) please let us know. A NPTO Cureopolis Center is needed in every city. "It's all about supporting the fight against cancer, honoring the survivors and remembering those who will forever live in our hearts." Donald Crutch 3 Thanks for your support! Donald .Crutch Founder & CEO National Pink Tie Organization #335 661 Blanding Blvd Suite 103 Orange Park, FL 32073 Email: donaldcnAc.h @npto.co Website: www. NationalPinkTieOrganization.org "Real Men Wear Pink Ties" "It's all about supporting the fight against cancer, honoring the survivors and remembering those who will forever live in our hearts." 4 _ 1 a 1 t. t the fi.- t WIM-929A WHEREAO, . th WHER,"S 7 'T . . ....... . : . . .... .... . ands rixert 0:10 -!, - & : fighf ,together f, ' nailo--` i d ty 0-- co L7 . . . . chefs. ... . . . . . w4d'i's,gr vwIng City of hi#aaut hardens, 4 -Fk- rid-as .. ZV h my Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, C'- �11 v. kt h U 4'2 r a `41 Name Address !pZ-12- 5ttU01'o1 &- Ir e,aev, ry 01 r t e fwl ti . Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councihmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council -e. 4801 West 50th Street Name �j� Edina, MN 55424 Address L_c .E \f Dear Edina City Councihnember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and -supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth 'are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end. homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, &4,vd y A(Zt4- Name Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address �l v Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing . homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,) Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 -7 -7 5 ALP-A /-- 7-r-/ Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, posttage �q�Ued The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. 5.49 postage requUed On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincer Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Mo,r Address CAI VA� Z'M 1 VAS c4wch ed,'t`ii AAl 5s#Zy Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive. housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name"�� Edina, MN 55424 Address C -3 X Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name �� r) 'vo t S Edina, MN 55424 Address Z CI) (l0 A NJ Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name L.0p Edina, MN 55424 Address 610o cviw" A-Ve, se Gel�,\L/ C�V�...» 6.49 postage required 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth aie homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name (11� Address I-/Y /Y V l fDrcl Vv y Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name gCC " *'Co CeR,cr�z!( Address ?>.-2--/ eft e4, 43G�oP d /1 CL VA- °� Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 i a.49 postage required a.qg postage requ'ved MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION April 29, 2014 7:15pm Braemar Golf Clubhouse — Harry Cooper Lounge I. CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Arseneault called the meeting to order at 7:47pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Arsenault, Bigbee, Cashmore, Carter, Davis, Haeg, Harrington, Kennedy, Sanders, Seidman and Winnick. Staff present: MJ Lamon, Staff Liaison, and Annie Coyle, City Management Fellow. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee to approve the meeting agenda of April 29, 2014. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Harrington. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of March 25, 2014; the motion was seconded by Commissioner Carter. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. 2014 Workplan Review i. Community Conversations Commissioner Bigbee provided a summary of the Community Conversations (formerly Community Outreach) working group. Commissioner Bigbee and Commissioner Davis are the co- chairs. Bigbee informed Commission that they have a working group.meeting scheduled for April 30th, 6:00pm at the library. The working group plans to hold their first event on May 13th at Southdale Library. Bigbee was in the process of getting advertising coordinated with City Staff. Next steps include active recruiting for participation from diverse neighborhoods to reach a goal of 20 in attendance. Chair Seidman arrived at 7:49pm. ii. Days of Remembrance Motion was made by Commissioner Davis to table the Days of Remembrance agenda item until the May meeting; the motion was second by Commissioner Arseneault. Motion carried. iii. Special Needs Awareness a ti l Commissioner Sanders reported that the Minnesota Department of Health has funding from a recently settled court case to support developmentally disabled children. There is a possibility of trying to partner with that program to access TPT documentaries and embed them into our website and partner with the Arts and Culture Commission for the Edina Film Festival. Commissioner Sanders is willing to bring the Special Needs Awareness Campaign Initiative forward at the Council Work Session. Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore to have Commissioner Sanders work on the Special Needs Awareness initiative; the motion was second by . Commissioner Kennedy. Motion carried. iv. Immigration Reform Commissioner Arseneault reported that the Immigration Bill was passed by the Senate, but still in the House. The HRRC adopted an Immigration Reform Resolution in Fall 2013. Arseneault will bring forward Immigration Reform at the City Council Work Session. Prep for May 20th City Council Work Session L Draft Agenda Review Chair Seidman opened discussion on topics to be presented to City Council during the work session. The group will first address current 2014 workplan initiatives. Commissioner Winnick will present a short summary on the 2013 Quasquicentennial. Commissioner Arseneault will address immigration reform. Commissioner Sanders will address the Special Needs Awareness. Chair Seidman will present summary on Anti - Bullying event and the Days of Remembrance and Genocide Awareness events. Commissioner Winnick will provide a progress report on Bias Offense Response Plan. The Bias Offense Committee has a final meeting May 6th and will share the draft changes to the plan with the commission before the Council Work Session. Commissioner Bigbee will provide a progress report about the Community Conversations Working Group. Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore to have Commissioner Sanders address Black History Month at the Council Work Session as a possible new initiative; the motion was second by Commissioner Kennedy. Motion carried. Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to have Commissioner Bigbee bring up affordable housing at the Council Work Session to determine the Council's direction; motion was second by Commissioner Cashmore. Motion carried. Commissioner Sanders shared research she did on becoming a Human Rights City. Motion was made by Commissioner Kennedy to have Commissioner Sanders address the possible attainment of Human Rights City certification at the City Council Work Session; the motion was second by Commissioner Arseneault. y Motion carried. Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to appoint Commissioner Carter as the point person for the shared Boards and Commissions klog "The Advisor" and to have him address the Blog at the Council Work Session; the_motion was second by Commissioner Cashmore. Motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. VIII. CHAIR, COMMISSION MEMBER, AND STUDENT COMMENTS A. Chair Comments Chair Seidman reminded commission of next regular meeting on May 27th, 2014. Commission discussed postponing Chief Nelson as a.special guest speaker in May due to the large agenda. Chair Seidman reminded commissioners'that they will also be identifying sub committees and working groups at the meeting. Staff will send out the draft subcommittee /working group document prior to the meeting. Commission Winnick also reported that the report from the Departmental Interview will also'be on the agenda. B. Commissioner Comments Multiple Commissioners commented that the Days of Remembrance events were memorable. Concerns were raised about the volume of new initiatives; the commission will review the new ideas after the Council Work Session. Commissioner Kennedy provided a handout of Star Tribune article on Indigenous People's Day in Minneapolis With, information about an event to be held on October 12th, 2014. It was noted that the daughter of the President of the School Board wrote a book about her grandparents who lived in the ghetto; the book may be good to feature at next year's Days of Remembrance. It was also noted that Native Americanshave a separate Days of Remembrance. IX. STAFF COMMENTS None. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee to adjourn the April 29th, 2014 meeting of the Human Rights and Relations Commission; motion was second by Commissioner Arseneault. Motion carried. Adjournment at 8:29 pm. Respectfully submitted, MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison Minutes approved by HRRC May 27, 2014 Jan Seidman,. HRRC Chair HUMAN Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. RIGHTS & RELATIONS Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session COMMISSION Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 4 ::::::: Arseneault, Patrice 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 8/4/2014 4 100% Bigbee, Arnie 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 100% Cashmore, John 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 100% Carter, Derek 2/1/2017 1 1 2 100% Davis, Laura 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 100% Kennedy, Ellen 2/1/2017 1 1 50% Seidman, Jan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 11 4 100% Sanders, Tiffany 2/1/2017 1 1 2 100% Winnick, Steve 2/1/2016 1 1 1 31 75% Haeg, Molly student 1 1 1 1 1 41 100% Harrington, Paige student 1 1 1 21 50% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type 1 " under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. •A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice Is given, the previously -scheduled meeting Is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAY 28 2014 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Schroeder, Platteter, Halva, Carr, Forrest, Staunton Members absent from roll: Scherer, Potts, Lee, Kilberg, Olsen III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Chair Staunton informed the Commission agenda item VI. A. has been continued to the Planning Commission on June 11, 2014. Commissioner Carr moved approval of the May 28, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission May 14, 2014 Commissioner Platteter moved approval of the May 14, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder noted his name was mentioned when he wasn't present. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No community comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. Stojmenovic. 5501 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Continued to 6/11/14 Chair Staunton asked the Commission and audience to note that the variance request for 5501 France Avenue, Edina, MN has been continued to the Planning Commission meeting on June 11, 2014. Page 1 of 11 B. Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Lennar Multifamily Communities LLC — 6725 York Avenue, 6628 Xerxes Avenue and 6700, 04, 08, 12 Xerxes Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC is requesting final review for a proposal to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue, and build a six -story, 240 unit upscale apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. Teague explained that this request has received the following approvals from the City Council: Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density; Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and Preliminary Development Plan. Teague stated the proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Plans, including the revised plans submitted to the City Council on May 6th. Revisions included moving the building 10 feet to the west away from Xerxes Avenue, reducing the square footage of retail space, and creating an additional setback of 8 feet on the top floor corners of the building on Xerxes. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue and build a six -story, 240 unit apartment building with 11,500 square feet of retail on the first level subject to the following findings: I . The project is consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plans. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 4. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. 5. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. 6. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Page 2 of 11 7. .The. proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the 'CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, -including retail and multiple family residential; on one,site. 8. The existing roadways would, support the project. WSB. conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development, could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A.Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. _Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and, diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with -other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density , districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below. • Site plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped May 12, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped May, 12, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped` May 12, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2014 • Building. materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section Page 3 of 11 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Any plantings in the right -of -way of York Avenue must meet the requirements of Hennepin County. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. S. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per; Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 7. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. Attempts must be'made meet an energy savings goal of) 0%. 8. All signage for the site' must meet;the` underlying PCD -3 Zoning District regulations. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in,the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014; including that all public utility easements shall be dedicated to the City. 10. At the, time of building permit application, compliance with'all of the conditions outlined in the chief building official's memo dated, March 27, 2014. 11. Continue to work with Hennepin County to secure a left turn in lane from south bound York Avenue. 12. Approval of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding consideration of R- I property within a PUD, rior to final rezoning. 13. Final Rezoning', is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14. Metropolitan Council approval of the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding land use, height and density. And also recommend that the City Council adopt the Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD Zoning District. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Development Manager, Lennar Multi - Family Communities and Aaron Roseth, ESG Architects. Applicant Presentation Mr. Chmielewski addressed the Commission and delivered a power point presentation highlighting the revisions made to the plans; specifically pointing out the increased setback and the eroded building corners. Chmielewski introduce_ d Aaron Roseth to further address the revisions. Mr. Roseth told the Commission the architectural design and massing of the project is based on urban design which includes a large opening in the building mass breaking up the south facade allowing for both increased solar penetration and a view of a vegetative courtyard. Page 4 of 11 Continuing, Roseth said the project has a contemporary and new street expression. Roseth presented the "materials board" depicting building materials featuring transparent glass storefront, masonry, and "Edina" limestone at the street. He explained above will float a traditionally inspired composition of masonry, architectural metal and large amounts of glass. Discussion Commissioner Forrest said light pollution is important to her, adding she wants assurances that no lighting is directed toward the residential properties on Xerxes Avenue. Forrest further questioned if any signs, monument or otherwise, were proposed for the Xerxes streetscape. Mr. Roseth responded that the lighting proposed would be normal "street lighting" including sconce lighting for the, "stoops" on the "townhouse" element. Forrest commented that her concern was that the lighting would have more of a "retail feel ". Roseth reiterated the lighting would be what one would expect in a residential setting not a retail setting. Mr. Chmielewski reported a monument sign is not proposed on Xerxes Avenue. Continuing, Forrest asked the development team to emphasize public green space where appropriate. Mr. Chmielewski responded the area is designed with a community feel, adding their intent was for the project to be part of the community and neighborhood. Commissioner Schroeder asked what their intent was for the green space on the Xerxes side and if plantings were proposed on the public right -of -way. Mr. Roseth stated their intent was to elevate the "townhome" feel of the building on Xerxes with individual stoops including lighting; however the green space would be a shared place for the entire building. Roseth said he can envision residents throwing a Frisbee, etc. in this common area. Continuing, Roseth said they didn't consider the boulevard area but would work with an arborist on what vegetation would work best in that area. Roseth acknowledged some boulevard trees do exist, adding they are committed to a tree line. Commissioner Schroeder commented in his opinion if any of the existing trees die during the construction phase they should to be replaced. Roseth responded that would make sense. Commissioner Schroeder referred to sustainable design methods and noted when a PUD is requested what the City is looking for in terms of a project are extraordinary measures, adding in his opinion what he's viewed so far is good; but not extraordinary. Mr. Roseth responded that in his opinion the location of the project itself is extraordinary, adding the walkability and area transition adds to this project. Continuing, Roseth pointed out people are now renting by choice, adding this location offers its .residents multiple amenities. Roseth further stated the project includes bus access, bike racks, bike storage, dedicated green space, integration of native landscaped environments, tree canopy, storm water management where currently there is none; including treating and holding water, paint energy friendly, LED lighting, Weidt Group input on heating and cooling, low flow showers, etc. Concluding, Roseth said a construction document would be created documenting all materials used in the project. A discussion ensued on sustainable design features and how they are measured. It was observed that the PUD process is a flexible process; however the City hopes that developers Page 5 of 11 strive for a design plan that exceeds what is normally expected. Commissioners acknowledged that it is difficult to require projects to exceed code but the PUD process should offer the flexibility to reach higher than code. Commissioner Forrest commented she would also like to see Lennar develop written tenant sustainable and safe building practices. Chair Staunton asked if the project includes an affordable housing component. Mr. Chmielewski responded that no affordable housing units are proposed. `Continuing,, Chmielewski said in discussions'with Richfield it was found that Richfield would not support affordable housing units on this site: Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Jim Halvorson; 6700 Xerxes Avenue. informed, the Commission he has lived in -Edina for 62 -years and in his opinion this is the time to redevelop this area. Halvorson said in this instance an evolution of the area is occurring, adding no one is the - enemy. There is a give and take between communities and taxes are generated by this project that benefits both cities. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the project; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing., Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Final Rezoning and. Final Development Plan approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder offered an amendment to the motion adding to the conditions that the developer will work with City staff to develop a landscaping plan for the boulevard area and if any of the existing'trees along the boulevard are lost as the result of construction that they be replaced. Commissioner Forrest offered another amendment.to include as a condition of approval that no signage; including monument be on Xerxes Avenue. Commissioners Platteter and Carr accepted those amendments. Chair Staunton stated he would be voting in favor'of the development project. He noted in his opinion the plans have been revised addressing the concerns expressed by both the Commission and City Council. Continuing, Staunton said the Commission continues to be frustrated with the Iack of traction on increased sustainable building practices. Staunton added he is also disappointed thataffordable housing wouldn't be added in this.project; however, he Page 6 of 11 believes the project on the whole is good for the City, Commissioner Platteter said in his opinion this project will be good for the City of Edina. He noted the site sorely needs to be redeveloped and through the approval process the project has continually improved. Platteter said the amenities of the area are an excellent benefit to the future residents of this building, adding eliminating access from Xerxes Avenue and ensuring the project has a residential feel vs. a commercial feel is also positive. Commissioner Carr stated she also supports the project and complimented all parties on the process. Chair Staunton called the Vote; Ayes, Schroeder, Forrest, Platteter, Carr, Staunton. Nay, none. Motion carried.5 -0. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Karen Kurt. Assistant City Manager. Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan. Staff Presentation Assistant Manager Kurt addressed the Commission and reported to the Commission the results of a Small Area Plan Survey she conducted in March. Kurt said she received responses from 21 individuals; seven responses were from Planning Commissioners, six from the Grandview Executive Committee, three from the City Council and five from Administration and Community Development Staff. Continuing, Ms. Kurt referred to the Small Area Plan Guidebook, adding after the Wooddale Valley View process is completed the book is intended to provide a general structure for future small area planning processes. Kurt explained that at this time the Guidebook is considered a draft and during the Wooddale and Valley View process staff and the "team" can alter, change, revise, etc. the Guidebook. Once the Wooddale and Valley View small area plan process is accomplished the Guidebook can be referred back to the Planning Commission as a template for further changes and eventually approval of the Guidebook. Kurt further discussed the formation of a Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Team Charter. This Planning Team would be a working group of the Planning Commission and would be chaired or co- chaired by a member of the Commission (Lee and Forrest have volunteered) along with other citizen volunteers. Kurt explained that team members chosen to serve would apply for the position, applications would be submitted and the applications would be screened by Lee and Forrest. The final "team roster" would be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval. Kurt concluded that a Request for Information (RFI) would be submitted for Page 7 of 11 consulting services for the Wooddale and Valley View small area plan. Responses to the RFI would be due by June 20`''. City Staff would review the responses and select finalists to interview with the small area plan team during the month of July. Comments Commissioners thanked Ms. Kurt for all her work and stated she did an excellent job and they were looking forward to the upcoming small area plan process. Commissioners presented the following comments: Support was expressed for the Planning Commission approving the Wooddale Valley View small area plan team. it was further noted that too many members could become a hindrance and limiting the membership is the right idea. Questions were raised if the small area plan team was guided by the same bylaws as the Planning Commission. Kurt explained that in the Planning Commission bylaws there is a section that addresses "working groups ". That section requires that a member(s) of the Planning Commission serve on the "group "; however, certain latitude is applied for other issues. Kurt stated there are some rules that would be followed such as the public meeting process, the taking of minutes etc. Ensure that the proposed June 16`h Kick -off meeting is adequately "advertised" and that the "word gets out" to solicit citizen volunteers for this group. Commissioners did indicate they believe healthy progress would be made if timelines are established in advance and adhered to. Support was expressed for the engagement of consultants indicating the collaboration between the "team" and consultant was important. Consider diversity when retaining the consultant. The relationship between the "team" and consultant is most important; don't focus too much on the technical. Look at ensuring a truthful and fruitful relationship with the consultant that is significant to "you" not those "back at the office ". Use term "work plan" throughout. Great idea to have an end date. Keep not only a written record of meetings but a record that includes pictures, etc. Once the formal small area plan guidebook is approved should the guidebook be placed in the Comprehensive Plan ( ?). Be flexible; however encourage a formal organized process that establishes markers. Identify the purpose of each meeting; plat a road map. It's good to have a beginning, middle and end. Concluding, Chair Staunton asked Ms. Kurt what she needs from the Commission at this time. Ms. Kurt responded a motion is needed establishing the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Planning Team Charter. Page 8 of 11 Motion Commissioner Schroeder moved approval of establishing a Wooddale Valley View Small Area Planning Team Charter. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Staunton and the Commission again thanked Ms. Kurt for her work on the small area plan process and also thanked Commissioners Lee and Forrest for volunteering to sit on the Planning Team as this process proceeds. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Housing Densities Planner Teague reported as a result of the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Lennar project the Metropolitan Council has requested that the City establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of uses allowed within each district. Currently the density allowed is less than that of the R- I and R -2 zoning districts. Continuing, Teague explained that there was a disconnect between the version of the Comprehensive Plan presented to the Commission and Council for final review and the version sent to the Metropolitan Council. It appears staff had incorrectly interpreted this so that Floor Area Ratio (FAR) could determine density for mixed uses areas (CAC, Edinborough, Centennial Lakes, 50`h & France, etc.); however, recently Met Council staff informed Edina city staff that specific density ranges must also be used and that the City's densities should be revised to reflect the existing description for its districts. Continuing, Teague noted that FAR alone cannot be used to determine densities within mixed use areas. Concluding, Teague referred to a handout that indicated how this is handled in the surrounding communities. Teague said at the Commissions June I I th meeting staff would be submitting a Resolution that reflects greater allowable density. The Commission would then forward their recommendation to the City Council for their review and approval on June I Th. Discussion Commissioners discussed the proposed changes with a comment that when reviewing the staff materials on the density ratio of surrounding communities it appears the City of Edina is well below its neighbors. The Commission questioned if the City is limiting itself by being so far below other communities. It was further recommended that the term used be "dwelling units ". Page 9 of 11 Commissioner Schroeder pointed out that if a cap is established the City can always go beyond that cap. Discussion concluded. Work Plan Planner Teague referred to the Commissions ,2014 Work Plan, adding that touching base on, the "Plan" periodically is important. Teague acknowledged that new Commission members would be interested in the 2014 Work Plan and the Commissions progress thusfar, adding the. Commission should also be looking forward to setting the 2015 Work Plan. Discussion Commissioner Platteter commented that it appears to him the Commission in one form or another is making progress on the 2014 Work Plan. Commissioners agreed; however did acknowledge -that some portions of the plan haven't been addressed. Commissioner Carr said work still needs to be done on a sign plan ordinance and lighting regulations. Commissioner Forrest commented she too would like to see more focus placed_ on light pollution and lighting standards. Commissioner Platteter added he can envision more Work being done on parking regulations /proof -of- parking. He also noted that work on the "Tree Preservation Ordinance" is not complete and still on- going. Planner Teague agreed more work.is needed, adding he can also foresee drilling down on sustainability measures and PUD as continuing topics of.discussion. Chair Staunton stated he would like this topic placed on the Planning Commissions agenda again so a discussion could occur with more members present. Planner Teague responded the Work Plan would be added to future agenda's. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION'COMMENTS Commissioner Carr reported;that Living Streets continues to make progress. Commissioner Platteter said he was looking forward to the completion of the France Avenue street project which will be an asset to the community. Page 10 of 11 Commissioner Platteter referre&to the Tree Preservation .Ordinance and asked the Commission to note a work shop. is proposed..on August 4`''. Platteter said further discussion on the Tree Preservation Ordinance would-occur before that work session. X. STAFF COMMENTS, Planner Teague reported that he was informed that the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on September 24a' is a religious observance day and the Planning Commission can't meet that day. Teague suggested that the meeting be rescheduled to the week before; week after or another date. Commissioner Platteter noted in a similar situation the Commission met once that month and started the meeting early if the. agenda warranted an .early start. Chair Staunton suggested further discussion on firming down this date. Planner Teague added, he would also e-mail Commissioners. as to their preference. XI. ADJOURNMENT. Commissioner Carr moved meeting adjournment at 10 PM. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. I R ctfully submitted Page 11 of 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAY 14 2014 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Scherer, Olsen, Kilberg, Halva, Lee, Forrest, Platteter Members absent from roll: Staunton, Potts, Carr 1111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Olsen moved approval of the May 14, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission April 23, 2014 Commissioner Olsen moved approval of the April 23, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. Commissioner Scherer noted a change to the minute's pg. I removing Chair Staunton and replacing it with Acting Chair Potts. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Acting Chair Platteter asked if anyone would like to speak to an issue not currently on the Agenda. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Commission suggesting that Residential Building Permits be required to have a residential check attached similar to the commercial check list attached to Commercial Building Permits. Grotz further suggested that the City conduct an open work session with the Watershed Districts on the permitting process. Commissioner Forrest moved to close community comment. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Page 1 of 8 Mr. Raih asked the Commission to note.that the grade was changed on a, lot that abuts his property to accommodate the construction of a new home. Raih said as a result a portion of his fence surrounding his pool now presents a safety issue because it is too short. Raih said he is requesting a variance to' allow an 8 46ot high fence to ensure safety. Discussion Commissioner Scherer raising the safety issue asked Mr. Raih if he would like the entire length of the fence 8 -feet, adding if so, she would be willing to support that. Raih pointed out the area adjacent and along the pool is the only area that needs an 8 -foot high fence; the existing fence adequately addresses safety. Public Testimony Acting Chair Platteter asked if anyone was present that would like to speak to the issue; being none', Commissioner Scherer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Discussion /Motion Commissioner Lee thanked the applicant for his well- documented submittal. Lee stated she supports the variance as presented. Commissioner Lee moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions: Commissioner. Olsen seconded the motion. All vote aye; motion carried. 5 -0 VI. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment— PUD applicability in an R- 1, R -2 and PRD- I Zoning District Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that current City Code regulations 'do not allow R -.I properties to be considered for Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning. When the PUD -Ordinance was created, there was a lot of discussion as to whether or not R- I property should be eligible for PUD rezoning: -The general purpose behind excluding R- I properties was to protect single family homes from potential redevelopment within single family home neighborhoods. Teague explained that this amendment would apply to any property that is located adjacent to commercial, industrial, or high density residential property. In general, it Page 3 of 8 she pointed out the areas in Edina highlighted, for potential change they were surprised and felt blindsided their neighborhoods abutted such areas. Schwab concluded that if the ordinance is amended what would stop others 'from coming forward :to do, the same. Acting Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the subject; being none Commissioner Lee moved to close the public-:hear;ing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Acting Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague if the proposed amendment would allow the residential homes abutting the Best Buy facility to be folded into a redevelopment of the Best Buy site.:. Planner Teague responded i.n the;affirmative; however, he pointed out regardless of allowing R- 1, R -2 and PRD1-1 properties to be rezoned to PUD the option to rezone those homes to another zoning district for redevelopment purposes is permitted: Teague further explained someone could buy those homes and request a. rezoning to any of the City's zoning districts; however, a.rezoning to PUD is prohibited from those three districts. Continuing, Teague explained that the PUD zoning designation is new to' Edina and at the time of:adoption the Commission and Council were hesitant to include R -1, R -2 and PRO- I properties because the City was unsure of how the PUD process would evolve. Commissioner Scherer referred to the map presented by Planner:Teague indicating areas that would be impacted by the proposed zoning ordinance amendment, reiterating that she has some concern that the "map" could encourage further encroachment into residential . neighborhoods; which is'something she stated she doesn't was to encourage. Commissioner. Lee said she agrees with the comments from Commissioner Scherer adding she also doesn't want to encourage commercial creep. She stated she was uncomfortable with an established percentage cap. Lee referred to the map and, noted the number of `..'pockets" impacted by this change, reiterating the percentage cap may not be the way to go. Commissioner Halva suggested reducing the percentage (20 -30 %) if Commissioners were uncomfortable with the recommended 50 %. Commissioners agreed that would also be an option. Commissioner Forrest stated she concurs with the comments so far; reiterating she too is concerned with commercial creep. Forrest said the Commission needs to keep in mind as it moves forward -how properties are identified in the Comprehensive Plan and how the City has ;traditionally used "transition" areasbetween districts. Commissioner Kilberg said in his opinion the PUD process has been successful and works .very well. Kilberg noted everything is a "give and take" and this ordinance amendment only provides the option "to ask ". Kilberg noted that as previously mentioned R -1, R -2 and PRD- I zoned properties don't have that option "to ask'; Page 5 of 8 the proposed revision, or striking the last sentence entirely and have the PUD option City wide. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved to recommend amending Ordinance Sec. 36- 254. Applicability /criteria by striking the last sentence — Property currently zoned R- 1, R -2 and PRD -I shall not be eligible for a PUD, and further eliminating finless it constitutes less than fifty percent of the total property the proposed PUD`,-as suggested by staff. Commissioner Lee seconded the Commissioner Lee stated in her opinion all zoning districts should be equally treated and certain areas should not be flagged. Acting Chair Platteter called for the vote; ayes, Scherer, Lee, Olson, Forrest. Nay, Platteter. Motion carried 4 -1. VI1. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Acting Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Forrest said the work group is continuing to move forward on the Valley View and Wooddale Small Area Plan. She added the process is scheduled to begin in June; with more details to follow. Acting Chair Platteter said the Tree Preservation Work Group presented the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance to the City Council at their last Council meeting. Platteter explained they had a great discussion; however, the City Council was hesitant to adopt the Ordinance as written and has tentatively scheduled an August 4th work session to discuss the tree ordinance. Continuing, Platteter asked Planner Teague to ask the City Council if the Commission could have the entire two hours for discussion. Teague responded that he would check. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that Taco Bell received Final Development Plan approval at the City Councils last meeting. Teague also reported with regard to the Lennar housing/retail project that the developers listened to the Commission and moved the building 10 -feet farther back from Xerxes Avenue. Teague added that they also worked on softening the fagade by removing some pieces. Page 7 of 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL May 13, 2014 7 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Cella, Deeds, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Student Members present: Good and Johnson. Absent: None. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Downing, to approve the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Greene, to amend the April 8, 2014 Park Board Meeting Minutes as follows: Page 2, Item VI.C., should be modified to read: "she notified the Park Board that there was a proposed contract with the Wild." Further on down, it should read "she provided basic outlines of various remodeling projects..." Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion carried. Member Cella made a motion, seconded by Member Steel, to approve the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Amended Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of April 8, 2014 Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. Vl. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Nine Mile Creek Trail Alignment through Bredesen Park Ms. Kattreh noted Eric Nelson from Three Rivers Park District is present to go through options previously presented to the Park Board. He would like the Park Board to make a recommendation on one of the options. Mr. Nelson presented three options for the Nine Mile Regional Trail Alignment, noting that option 2 is essentially eliminated due to lack of perceived support by the Park Board as well as the significant 1 required grading and removal of existing vegetation. He pointed out the advantages and drawbacks of each option. He noted that both staff and the Three Rivers Park District are recommending option 1. Member McCormick asked about bicyclists and walkers sharing the trail. Mr. Nelson pointed out the distance on the proposal where the trail would be shared by walkers and bikers. He explained trails on bridges are 12 feet wide. Additionally, the segment of shared trail off the bridge would be widened to 10 feet. Chair Gieseke asked about any safety concerns. Mr. Nelson responded all regional trails are shared by bikers, walkers, rollerbladers, and so this trail can certainly be constructed with appropriate safety measures. Member Steel asked about safety concerns on two -way traffic. Mr. Nelson responded no, because there is a separate path for walkers, and that is adequate for two -way traffic. Ms. Kattreh pointed out the restrooms are on the east side by the parking lot, in response to a question by Member Steel. Mr. Nelson noted two -way traffic does make things easier on a regional trail. Member McCormick commented the area is dense and visibility can be challenging. Ms. Kattreh noted in areas where there is limited visibility, there may be a stripe put on the path to really delineate directions. Member Deeds expressed concern about safety where passing may occur. He agreed on the importance of striping the path. Member Jacobson asked about widening the trail to 10 feet wide on the 8 feet portions to alleviate safety concerns. Ms. Kattreh noted a two -way 8 feet trail is accepted and is standard. Member Segreto noted the twists and turns are somewhat self - limiting in terms of a bicyclist not being able to go full speed. She cautioned against widening to 10 feet, because of the environmental impacts. Member Jones asked about the grading off the bridge, and Mr. Nelson responded the grade will be 5 percent. Member Jones asked if Three Rivers Park District has presented this material to any other groups. Mr. Nelson responded the route has been presented to the Transportation Commission and the Edina School District, and both expressed support for the route. Member Deeds stated option 1 makes most sense, but he does not see a way of keeping the traffic one - way. He believes the trail should be striped to maintain safety. Member Steel asked about the longevity of striping. Mr. Nelson responded five to seven years is an average lifespan. Member Segreto asked about colors of striping. Mr. Nelson responded the regional trails are striped yellow and the connections are striped green. 2 Member Downing commented it would be confusing to have the trail be two -way at one point and one - way at another point. Consistency would help bikers. Ms. Kattreh stated most of the surveying was done with walkers, and some bicyclists can be added.if the Park Board chooses. The Park Board discussed the closest restrooms are Walnut Ridge or the Fred Richards /Centennial Lakes area. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, to approve alignment #1 as the alignment option for the Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail. Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion carried. Member Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Downing, to make the Bredesen Trail two -way traffic flow with striping. Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion carried. VI.B. Request for Proposal for Park System Master Plan Ms. Kattreh asked for comments and feedback on the RFP. Member Steel asked about budgeting and the CIP. Ms. Kattreh responded this master plan would provide a very detailed and prioritized scheduled for improvements in the park system. Programming was not specifically called out, but it would be a component that would have to be discussed. Member Steel asked if a survey will be completed. Ms. Kattreh responded staff would like to utilize the community surveys already completed. Staff will also undergo an extensive public engagement process. Member Deeds asked about the hoped -for outcome. Ms. Kattreh responded she would like a plan that can guide the park system for the next 20 to 40 years. It will help prioritize and budget what improvements should be made in the parks. It will help staff identify trends and potential areas that are missing in the current park system. She would like to address the needs of the athletic associations and find out what the public thinks about the park system. She would like see what Edina has compared to other park systems to meet the very highest standards. Member Jones asked why the enterprise facilities were excluded from this plan, noting there has been discussion of reclassifying the enterprise facilities. Ms. Kattreh responded the facilities were eliminated because operational efficiency studies have already been completed on several of those operations. They will continue to be studied in terms of cost recovery and in terms of business plans. Member Downing commented it is important to determine how success can be measured with regard to this consulting process. Ms. Kattreh agreed it will be important to decide upon a set of criteria. Member Cella asked about Fred Richards. Ms. Kattreh agreed there are multiple concurrent projects. It might not be an ideal scenario, but this is the given timeframe. 3 Member. Steel asked about the public input process for Fred Richards repurposing. Ms. Kattreh responded the public engagement process starts June 12, including public meetings, visits at the site, and other techniques to engage residents who live in the neighborhood and residents throughout the city. Member Steel noted the Edina School District is beginning a strategic planning process in a couple of months. Ms. Kattreh noted there is a very detailed inventory of all the sports facilities in the city that was used for the Sports Dome. The Park Board discussed whether the proposed RFP will be able to address the various issues facing the park system right now and in the future, including the repurposing of Fred Richards and a possible new community center in the Grandview redevelopment district. Also discussed was whether adequate funding is available to make this RFP as effective and helpful as it could be. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Downing that the strategic master planning subcommittee meet and come back to the Park Board with a proposal at the June Park Board meeting. Member Steel suggested that the RFP be edited so that the points are as broad as possible, and that the priorities are as listed at the top. Ayes: Members Cella, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion Carried. VI.C. Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Task Force Ms. Kattreh asked for a recommendation of two Park Board members to the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Task Force. Members McCormick and Deeds volunteered for the task force. Chair Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to recommend Members McCormick and Deeds to the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Task Force. Ayes: Members Cella, Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto, Greene. Motion Carried. VI.D. Fred Richards Reuse Study Ms. Kattreh reviewed the timeline of the Fred Richards reuse process to date and highlighted the future key dates and action items. Member Downing asked about the communications process back to the public. Ms. Kattreh responded the consultant will be able to advise the most effective communications process, and the Communications Department will be involved. Mailings will be utilized as well as press releases, the website, and social media. Ms. Kattreh noted the Park Board will be a significant stakeholder in this process, and staff will keep the Park Board up -to -date on the site walks, the meetings, and everything else related. The consultant will help identify other stakeholders as well, including Three Rivers Park District and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 4 9 Ms. Kattreh noted there has not been a discussion regarding the budget for repurposing at this stage. VI.E. 2014 Park Board Work Plan Projects Chair Gieseke asked for Park Board feedback on any priorities in the work plan. Member Jones asked about including green initiatives in the strategic master planning process. Member Deeds stated a conversation needs to begin on cost recovery goals for enterprise facilities. Member Steel added that cost recovery goals should be included as part of the strategic master planning process: Member Downing volunteered for the subcommittee on fundraising for Parks & Recreation. Member, Jones suggested the:subcommittee can now meet to begin brainstorming. Member Cella asked about the Wooddale Park barrier -free playground equipment and a possible matching grant. Ms. Kattreh responded there has been no movement on that project to date. In response to a question from Member Cella, Ms. Kattreh reported staff is holdingofF on Arneson Acres until later this year as the master planning process gets underway: Staff.also does not have a lot of extra time right now to devote to that master plan. Member Cella suggested staff communicate about the timeline with the Garden Council, the donors. Ms. Kattreh concurred. Member Segreto offered to work on the Urban Forest Initiative. Ms. Kattreh stated that will be coordinated with the Energy and Environment Commission as well. Member Cella commented on the amount of money allocated towards Fred Richards, Braemar; and Arneson Acres; as compared with the strategic master plan. She emphasized the importance of funding priorities. Ms. kattreh commented on the cost recovery goals, suggesting a committee of Park Board members who would meet with facility managers and help provide insight and direction from the Park Board to help guide staff in the next round of business plans. She would like to see improved understanding of expenses and business plans; the City Council would be interested in hearing a report from the Park Board regarding what is a feasible cost recovery percentage. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VII.A. Council Updates No discussion. VII.B. Other Correspondence No discussion. VII.C. Veteran's Memorial Committee, March 21, 2014 Minutes No discussion. Vill. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS, Member Jones asked about the status of the proposed contract with the Wild. Ms. Kattreh responded the Wild have not responded to the proposed contract, so staff is patiently waiting. 5 I Member Jones noted she served on .the Grandview steering committee for two years, during which time a framework was developed. After the framework was approved, the City. Council directed the Park Board to handle the next step, which would be to address the community needs, which would drive building needs. The Park Board was given a seat on the Citizen Advisory Team. She commended Sue Jacobson for representing -the Park Board with her vote, which states an unbiased consultant should be hired to pursue what community needs would•be. The City Council will be voting on th'e next step on May 20. Two members of the Grandview_CAT would prefer partnering with a-developer on the next step. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh provided the following update: this Saturday is the National Kids to Parks Day at: Rosland Park; the Community Garden is open for planting; last week was the groundbreaking for the Braemar Sports Dome; two scoreboards were: dedicated at Pamela Park; Centennial Lakes Park is open for the season; the Edina Aquatic Center is opening on June 7; and the second and,final bid package for the Braemar Sports Dome and outdoor rink projects along with the Pamela Park site,work bid; package are opening soon as well. X. ADJOURNMENT Chair Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Downing, to adjourn the meeting at 8:54 p.m. Ayes: Members Cella;'Downing, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick, Segreto,'Greene. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m. 6 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage'Preservation. Board Edina City Hall - Community Room Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering'roll call was Chair Birdman and Members Moore, Mellom, Weber, Sussman, O'Brien, and Christiaansen. Absent were Members McDermott, Brandt and Johnson. Staff present.was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member.McLellan moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Moore.seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES April 8, 2014 Member O'Brien moved approval of.the April 8, 2014 minutes. Member Moore - seconded the motion: ' All voted aye. The motion carried., V. COMMUNITY COMMENT —`None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A.. 'H -14 -4 4601 Browndale Avenue.- A new front entry overhang Planner Repya explained that the subject- property is located on the east side of the 4600 block of Browndale Avenue: The existing home, a Mediterranean style, was constructed in 1925. The Certificate of Appropriateness request is for the addition of a new front entry overhang on the front street facing facade of the home. The proposed 24 square foot (2'6" x 9'8 ") overhang requires a COA because it is a structural change to the street facing facade of the home. The.existing front entry is flush with the west facade of the home, and is surrounded by what the applicant describes as Mankato glacier buff stone in a random pattern. Stone .columns, walls- and a terrace lead up to the front entrance; which are elevated 3 steps above the first floor elevation of the home. The applicant has explained that in an attempt to provide shelter at the front entry as well as a greater degree of design.depth and interest, they are, proposing a new flat- roofed, front entry overhang with copper fascia to match. the existing gutter and downspout system. The work will include removing the existing randomly placed Mankato stone `surrounding the front. door and Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 13, 2014 replacing it with Mankato stone in a uniform design and honed finish. The design is intended to be compatible with the style of the home, maintaining its historic integrity, with no loss of distinctiveness. The proportions and materials have been designed to be consistent with the home's Mediterranean style. Originally, the plan called for removal of an original Juliet balcony over the front door (option A). At the request of Staff, the applicant has provided an alternative plan (option B) which maintains the Juliet balcony. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel provided a written evaluation of the project where he observed that the subject home has been evaluated as a contributing heritage resource within the Country Club District because it illustrates the land use and architectural controls imposed by the developer Samuel S. Thorpe during the district's period of historical significance (1924- 1944). However, the home is not individually eligible for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. He pointed out that both the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation and the district plan of treatment allow for removal of historic fabric and the introduction of new architectural elements in historic districts, provided the new work is compatible with the historic character of the house and the surrounding neighborhood. The arrangement of doors and windows is a character - defining aspect of Spanish Eclectic /Spanish Colonial Revival style domestic architecture. However, the stone trim and ironwork around the entrance at 4601 Browndale are not significant character defining facade details in their own right. The cut stone door surround is not commonly seen on Spanish - themed period revival style houses dating from the 1920s; however it does not compromise the historic integrity of the house or the neighborhood. The applicant proposes to replace the stone with similar, but more uniformly cut stone, resembling ashlar, which would actually be visually more appropriate than the existing stone work. The curved wrought -iron balconet ( "Juliet balcony ") that protrudes slightly from the wall above the front door is an original architectural element and an integral part of the facade. Mr. Vogel added that the addition of front entry overhang, as well as the replacement of the stone surround will not have a measurable adverse impact on the historic integrity of the house or surrounding homes in the Country Club district. The front door surround and balconet are not primary historic character defining elements of the facade, and the historic significance of the subject property is the product of its association with the Thorpe plan of development, not its architectural details. Mr. Vogel recommended approval of the COA, however, in the interest of preserving the historic fabric of the home, suggested the applicant consider retaining the existing balconet and lighting fixture. Prior to the meeting, the applicant provided a revised plan that addressed Mr. Vogel's recommendation that the light fixture over the door be retained. The new plan also provided for a wrought iron railing on top of the new overhang - wider than the existing Juliet balcony, 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 13, 2014 but in proportion with the proposed overhang. Planner Repya concluded that she recommended approval of the plans for the new front entry canopy demonstrated in most recent plans including the retained light fixture and new railing atop the overhang. Findings supporting the approval recommendation included: • The front entry overhang will complement the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. • A wrought iron balcony was original to the home and an integral part of the front facade. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Plan of Treatment and Zoning Ordinance. Conditions associated with the approval recommendation include: • Subject to the revised plans presented dated May 12, 2014 Nathan Franta, Reuter Walton Construction and Brandi Hagen, Eminent Interior Design representing the property owners were present to address questions from the board. Board Comments: Member Christiaansen questioned whether the purpose of the new overhang was for protection or architectural interest - adding that because it is so shallow, it won't provide much protection. Brandi Hagen responded that the design of the overhang is two -fold, both protection (albeit minimal) and architectural interest. Ms. Christiaansen also observed that the proposed project appears to fit with the aesthetics of the proposed home, but wondered how the changes to the front facade would impact the surrounding homes. She suggested that in the future, applicants provide photos of the adjacent homes so proposed changes can be viewed in the context of the surrounding properties as well. Member McLellan questioned whether the storm entry door would remain. Ms. Hagen responded that they do not plan on retaining the existing storm door. Member Sussman asked for clarification on the following elements of the plan: • The cornice moulding is a lovely feature and proposed to be replaced. What is the current condition and how do you propose to replace it? Nathan Franta explained that the existing cornice material is gypsum plaster, and suffering from considerable deterioration. They are hoping to replicate the cornice with a durable material which has not yet been determined. • The proposed stone surrounding the front entry is not unique in the district - on a drive thru, at least 15 homes with similar stonework were identified. Why is it being replaced? 3 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 13, 2014 Brandi Hagen explained that the existing stone and stucco surrounding the front door is damaged and needs replacing - interestingly the failure of the stone /stucco is what has precipitated the proposed project. Drainage proposed for the new flat roofed overhang - it isn't demonstrated on the plan. Mr. Franta explained that a scudder system will be implemented to drain into the existing downspout. e The overhang lacks support which could be provided with brackets. Mr. Franta responded that the overhang is so shallow that it does not require supporting brackets which could somewhat overwhelm the front entry. Mr. Sussman concluded that he appreciated the applicant addressing the comments made by Consultant Vogel and himself by providing a revised plan; and added that the proposal appears to be fitting for the home. Member Mellom questioned whether the subject home was a contributing resource in the district; and whether considering changes to the street facing facades was appropriate. Ms. Mellom also opined that changes to the facades are not recommended in the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation. Consultant Vogel responded that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation which is referenced in the district's plan of treatment does allow for changes. Specifically, rehabilitation is defined as "The act or process of making a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural or architectural value ". Member Weber observed that in addition to the definition cited by Consultant Vogel; the recent decision of the City Council upholding approved changes to the street facing fa4ade of the home at 4505 Arden Avenue, demonstrated that the Council does support changes to the street facing facades of Country Club District homes when they are approved through the COA process. Taking that direction from the Council, Mr. Weber concluded that considering changes to the street facing facades of homes in the district is appropriate Following a brief discussion, Member Weber moved approval of the COA subject to the revised plans dated May 12, 2014. Member Moore seconded the motion. Members Christiaansen, McLellan, Sussman, O'Brien, Birdman and Weber voted aye. Member Mellom voted nay. The motion carried. 4 V1 _ Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 13, 2014 VII. OTHER BUSINESS A., Heritage Preservation Board Training: Identification of Heritage Resources In,keeping with the observance of Preservation Month, Consultant led-the HPB in an annual . training exercise - this year entitled '.`The Identification of .Heritage Resources ". Board members referred .to the National Register Bulletin #24 "Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning" as Mr. Vogel explained the goals and approaches to conducting surveys in the community. Of particular interest to the board were hand -outs defining the field descriptions to be gathered for each property. Mr. Vogel pointed out that the° "Explore the History of Your Home" pro ject.undertaken by the HPB could easily use the field description format to compile information on;Edina residences. Concluding the information on surveys, Mr. Vogel observed that he ,has found 4t' graders and girl scouts (and.their parents) to be some of the best surveyors. They are welcomed by residents, and persistent. in completing the task. He added that it is also a great way to get the community involved in conducting surveys. The .board thanked Mr. Vogel for enlightening them on the importance of surveys to the city's preservation . program. B. ' Preservation Month 1. 2014 Activities J Planner Repya explained that the highlight of Preservation Month will be the City Council meeting on May 2e when the Mayor will read a "Preservation Month" proclamation into.the public record. The 2014 theme announced by the National Trust for Historic Preservation is "New Age of Preservation: Embark, Inspire, Engage!" After receiving the Preservation Month proclamation, the 2014 Heritage Award will be presented to Brian and Linda Tell, owners of the "Arthur Erickson House", 5501 Londonderry Road. Board member Bob Moore will be making the, presentation which will include PowerPoint slides with great photos of the 1950; Frank Lloyd Wright, Jr. designed home. 2. 2015 Planning Chair Birdman suggested that.rather than have the entire HPB working.on plans for the, 2015 Preservation Month activities; a subcommittee be formed of several board members who can work on "that project, and submit suggestions for. the entire board to consider. The board agreed that would;-be a very.good idea which they.would discuss.at a future meeting. 01 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes . May 13, 2014 C. Explore the History of Your Home : Committee Report Chair Birdman reported that the committee is in he process of completing the revisions to the proposed survey; adding that the "materials provided 'by Mr. Vogel with they local survey training will be helpful. Once the survey is fine- tuned, the.plan is to share it with city employees who live in Edina as well as members of boards and commissions, and perhaps even the City Council - That'should provide a good base of information to evaluate., VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Moore reported that the May I I th "Spring Seed Social & Mother's' Day Open House" sponsored by the Edina Historical Society and the Oliver H. Kelley Grange at the Grange Hall in Tupa Park was a smashing success. Member Mellom announced that she recently toured the historic towns of Decorah and Dubuque, Iowa; and found them both to be fascinating - with a-lot to offer anyone - interested in heritage preservation. Ms. Mellom also expressed an'interest in the HPB revisiting the Country Club District's plan of treatment to tighten up the language- adding that she believes that changes to the front facades - of the homes should not be allowed. Furthermore, she would like more`emphasis on voluntary compliance. Planner Repya explained that an evaluation of the district's -plan of treatment has not been recognized by the City Council as a task for the 2014 work plan. Since the work of the HPB is at the direction of the City Council, if the board agrees that the district's plan of treatment needs to be reevaluated, that task would need to be at the direction of the City Council for the 2015 work plan. Ms. Repya observed that the current, plan of treatment, approved by the City Council in 2008, is'the product of months of deliberation between the HPB and Country Club district representatives as they reevaluated the original 2003 plan. Member Weber stated that he would appreciate receiving some background on the creation -,of the plan of treatment, adding thattl ere have been so many changes to many homes in the - district that4 strict interpretation of the Secretary of the Interior's standards can't be used. Responding to Mr. Weber's request, Ms. Repya agreed to- share both the 2003 and 2008 plans with the board; commenting that the intention of the 2008 revision was to clarify the language 6 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 13, 2014 and strike a balance between preservation and ,property rights. At that time, both the City Council and the district residents .involved in revising -the plan agreed that,the. new (2008) version provided the lacking clarity. Consultant Vogel pointed out that.the Secretary of the Interior's standards provides four standards to choose from: I Preservation - freeze drying; ,1 Restoration - replicating; 3. Reconstruction; or 4. Rehabilitation - allowing for alterations and modifications to provide a contemporary use. The standard used in the district's plan of treatment.is "Rehabilitation" because it-is philosophically consistent with Thorpe's original plan for "the district - -to ensure that the style of the homes fit the character of the neighborhood. Records show that he wasn't as concerned with the details of each home. Member Christiaansen observed .that people live in the Country Club District homes - the homes are not museums, nor individual landmark properties; and as such they must be livable. At over.80 years old, many of these homes are wearing out - and just because a home is old doesn't mean it was done right. Ms. Christiaansen opined that the HPB should be open to considering changes to the street facing facades of homes, and deal with them on a case -by -case basis. Chair Birdman observed that Member Mellom believes that.the Country Club District's plan of treatment needs to .be revised, yet he has also heard comments from the consultant, staff, and board members that the plan is working just fine. Mr. Birdman suggested that at the next meeting of the HPB if ,a majority of the board agrees that the plan of treatment needs to be revised, a request to add that task to the 2015 work plan could be brought to the City Council for consideration. However, ,if a majority of the HPB believes, that the existing plan of treatment is working well, then no further action,would betaken. Member Sussman pointed out that since Consultant Vogel drafted the original plan of treatment. in 2003, and the 2008 revision, he would be interested in receiving An evaluation of both plans from Mr. Vogel. The Board agreed that they liked the approach Chair Birdman suggested, and agreed, to provide Ms.. Repya. with comments on the plan of treatment which she will compile and prepare for discussion at the next meeting. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Repya reported that she and Consultant Vogel will be visiting Maeri Oskam, the owner of '6901 Dakota Trail who has expressed an interest in exploring the possibility of designating her home a heritage landmark. Designed by one of the first female architects in Minnesota, Lisle Close, this Contemporary style home was built in 1963 on the banks of 7 v Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes May 13, 2014 Indianhead Lake, and is truly a treasure. In addition to meeting with Mrs. Oskam,:they will also be meeting the owner of the architectural firm Close and Associates Gar Hargens, and Larry Millett, a local preservationist. Ms. Repya concluded that she looked forward,to providing the board with a report of her visit at the next meeting. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE June 10, 2014 at Arneson Acres XII. ADJOURNMENT 9 :05 p.m. Member -O'Brien moved for adjournment at 9:05'p.m. 'Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion- carried. Respectfully submitted', Joyce R.epya 8 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 3, 2014 10:45 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 10:45 P.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 20, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner Sprague, approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for May 20, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AWARD CONTRACTS I, 2, 4, & 5 SOT" AND FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS P -23 Manager Neal noted that the City Council had previously approved the Award of Bid for the 50`h and France Parking and Wayfinding Improvement P -23 Contracts 1, 2, 4 and 5. Since the HRA was also the funding source for some of the proposed improvement the HRA must also approve the contracts. Motion by Commissioners Swenson, seconded by Commission Sprague approving the Request for Purchase, Award of Bid — Improvement P -23 50th and France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements (Contracts 1, 2, 4 and 5), awarding the bid for Package I to the recommended low bidder, Blackstone Contractors, at $447,000.00; and awarding the bid for Package 2 to the recommended low bidder, Restoration Systems, at $863,000.00; awarding the bid for Package 4 to the recommended low bidder, Blackstone Contractors, at $1,089,045.00; and, awarding the bid for Package 5 to the recommended low bidder, Superior Painting, at $204,397.00 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday May 8, 2014 7:04 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:04p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Bale, Glahn, Gubrud, Kostuch, Latham, Rudnicki, Sokol, Thompson, Waddick, Zarrin, and Chair Heer. Absent: Howard Late Arrival: Sierks Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes. Member Latham on VI. E. fourth sentence from bottom add 'Based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity Commissioner Latham believes that, the City would not be liable, absent negligence on the City's part, " Member Latham removed "the" in VI. F. first sentence. Motion made by Member Thompson and seconded by Member Kostuch to approve the amended Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. B. Attendance report and roster. No Comment. C. Workgroup list and minutes. Chair Heer and Member Sokol suggested changing the Student Subcommittee to a Working Group to invite students attending secondary schools in Edina in environmental and energy clubs. By doing this the monthly reports will be more informative and help promote EEC event better. Motion made by Chair Heer and seconded by Member Thompson to form the Student Working Group. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Kostuch to approve the remaining Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comment. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Minneapolis Sustainability Efforts. Gayle Prest, Sustainability Director for Minneapolis, gave an update on what they do. Minneapolis uses the St Paul Port Authority to approve Solar Panel projects. She reviewed the City's Climate Action Plan on how to reduce the City's citywide greenhouse gas emissions. They are tracking their greenhouse gas reduction through National Protocol for City's with ICLE. Gayle is proposing on how we can I work better with Hennepin County due to lots of grants available. Member Sierks arrived at 7:34p.m. B. Burnsville Sustainability Efforts. Sue Bast, Environmental Specialist,.for Burnsville. The City adopted Green Steps in 2009. A consultant was,hired to educate the Burnsville Council members and City,staff and devised a plan for the.city that included educating staff, selecting a sustainability. coordiriator (part time role for existing employee) and a sustainability council with members from all City departments. The City has a sustainability checklist in the Planning Dept. Their Council has all staff working on goals. Burnsville said they are on track to meet 15% CO2 reduction in City Operations by 2015. C. Preparation and prioritization for June 3 CC /EEC Meeting. Chair Heer reviewed the draft Agenda for the City Council Work Session on June 3`d. The topics will be proposed ordinance changes to permit Bee and chicken- keeping, discuss.EEC role in City's efforts to realize Comprehensive Plan Chapter 10 environmental commitments in the City's operation and an`'update onAke Business Recycling: D. PACE Advisory. Member Sierks explained that St. Paul Port Authority will administer the PACE program instead of the EEC liaison. The City would need to enter a joint powers agreement with them. The only. action required of the City would be to place a lien on the property, collect the money every six months and remit to SPPA. This will only be for Commercial property owners. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Gubrud to send the PACE Advisory to Council. Motion carried unanimously. E. Local Food Working Group. Member Latham gave an update on the edits from the Police Dept. for the proposed ordinance changes to permit Bee and chicken - keeping. The Police Dept. need an annual renewal for safety in case an owner wants to discontinue the hive. Speak Up Edina had 32 residents participated in the bee and chicken keeping discussion with' 100% support. The:,Police Dept. would like a $20 fee for bee keeping for mailings. The Police Dept. said ;there should be a better appeal process. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. Open.Meeting Law Violation. Mr. Bintner reminded Commissioners that they can't email a majority due to the Open Meeting Law standards. Members Rudnicki excused himself from the meeting at 8:45p.m. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. Member Sierks said the group learned how the City plans and designs energy projects. Each City building has different owners and budgets..Mr ;,Barnes has no.. authority or budget he can only make suggestions. There is a State program to help review the facilities on energy use. B. Business Recycling Working Group: Member Zarrin said there are five restaurants at 50th & France'doing organic recycling. There is a passcode on the dumpster so that garbage won't be mixed with it. The Galleria and Southdale Shopping Center are the next goals to achieve. C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. Members Kostuch and Heer meet with Eric Roggeman, Asst._Finance Director, and said. Eric talked to City staff about adding the new sustainability form to the CIP by-:the end of May. Member Kostuch said City vehicles are not in CIP process as vehicles are replaced as needed by City departments via their individual budgets. D. Community Solar Subcommittee. Member Sierks said the next meeting will be a scoping meeting. The topics will be looking for potential sites for a solar project, for community solar do you want to contract the program and maintenance of the panels, discuss bidding requirements and does the City want more than one site. E. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Thompson thanked all the volunteers that helped with the April 28th event. There were 110 attendees. The movie "Bag It" will be held on May 16th. The July 4th parade theme is "Deeper Shade of Green ". F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. Member Gubrud said there are nine discounted visits left. G. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. No update. H. Student Subcommittee. Member Sokol said Project Earth raised $700 of the $6200 needed for the solar charging station. There was a charging station installed at the Media Center, but it's not solar, so maybe the cost will be lower through a conversion. I. Water Quality Working Group. Member Waddick said the group is trying to figure out what they are doing. She hopes to focus on Storm Drains and runoff. She visited the City of Minneapolis to review their Storm stenciling kits. Nine Mile Creek Watershed will let the group know what areas of the city are left to stencil or be refreshed. Water Bottle Advisory. Member Zarrin gave an update on the profit of the City's water bottle sales. The EEC is encouraging the City to reduce its water bottle sales and install hydrations stations. The high school has five hydration stations. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Waddick to accept two changes and forward the advisory to Council. Roll Call was taken: Ayes: Gubrud, Latham, Sierks, Thompson, Waddick, Zarrin and Chair Heer. Nays: Glahn, Kostuch Absent: Howard, Rudnicki Motion Carried. K. 2014 EEC Summary and Schedule. Mr. Bintner said he'll plan an August infrastructure tour again. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Council Communications. Mr. Bintner reviewed the "Communications with the City Council" for Boards and Commissions. B. EEC Budget Summary. Mr. Bintner will bring EEC Budget Summary to June meeting. C. City Projects. No Comments. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Heer declared the meeting adjourned at 9:46 p.m. Motion made by Member Thompson and seconded by Member Zarrin to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, ebecca Foster GIS Administrator O P, • CCRPORf 11 • 1888 To: Members of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: June 17, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -03 Awarding the Sale of $16,360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -03 Relating to Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 and Authorizing the Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment Thereof Information / Background: The $16,360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 has two purposes: 1) $12,445 million is for the construction of a Sports Dome, a new Braemar Outdoor Ice Rink and Braemar refrigeration system improvements and 2) $3.2 million Pamela Park improvements to renovate fields, parking, trails and a reconstructed shelter building. Attached is the resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds and authorizing the execution of a ground lease and a lease agreement providing for the construction of the above projects and the lease thereof by the City as drafted by the City's bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney. These agreements are similar to what has been done in the past with previous issues of Public Project Revenue Bonds including bonds to finance the building of Gymnasiums and a portion of the Public Works facility. The award of sale of the Public Project Revenue Bonds is a Housing and Redevelopment Authority resolution and the authorization of the lease agreement is a City action. The bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, June 17. The bids and Ehlers & Associates analysis will be presented to the City Council at the June 17 Council meeting. ATTACHMENT: Resolution 2014 -03 Ground Lease Between City of Edina and HRA Lease Agreement Between HRA and City of Edina Indenture Between HRA and U.S. Bank National Association City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 J CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO PUBLIC PROJECT-REVENUE BONDS (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS) SERIES 2014 Issuer: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Governing Body: Board of Commissioners Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on June 17, 2014, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): RESOLUTION NO. 2014-03 RESOLUTION RELATING TO PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014 (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF . I; the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the Bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said Bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer on June 2014. Secretary Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its. adoption, which motion was seconded by Commissioner RESOLUTION NO. 2014-03 RESOLUTION RELATING TO PUBLIC PROJECT. REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014 (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE. . FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority "), as follows: Section 1. AUTHORIZATION AND SALE. 1.01. Authorization. The City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") desires to provide adequate City Hall and public safety facilities and has determined that the most efficient way to do so is to lease - purchase the facilities pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.65. Acting pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivision 1(7), the Authority has the power to acquire real property, by lease or- otherwise, and construct the proposed facilities for lease to the City. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033, and Chapter 475, the Authority further has the power to issue revenue bonds to provide the funds necessary for the acquisition, construction, remodeling, renovation and furnishing of the facilities. Pursuant to the foregoing authority, the Authority proposes to undertake the acquisition, construction and furnishing of additional recreational facilities of the City consisting of a sports dome, outdoor refrigerated ice rink and improvements to Braemar Arena and Pamela Park (herein the "Facilities ") and to finance the cost thereof by the issuance of its Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations) (the "Bonds ") under this Resolution and a Trust Indenture, to be dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Indenture "), between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as trustee (the "Trustee "). The Facilities will be located on land which will be ground leased by the City to the Authority pursuant to a Ground Lease, to be dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Ground Lease "). The Authority proposes to lease the Facilities subject to the Ground Lease to the City pursuant to a Lease Agreement, to be dated as of July .1, 2014 (the "Lease "), between the Authority, as lessor, and the City, as lessee. All bonds issued under this Resolution and the Indenture will be secured solely by rental payments to be made by the City pursuant to the Lease, and funds held by the Trustee under the Indenture, and said bonds and the interest on said bonds shall be payable solely from the revenue pledged therefor under the Indenture and no such bonds shall constitute a debt of the Authority or the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation nor shall constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Authority or City or a charge against their general credit or taxing powers and shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Authority or City, other than the revenues pledged to the payment of the bonds under the Indenture. Under the Lease, and subject to the right of termination.by the City at the end of each fiscal year of the City as provided in the Lease, the City is to pay to the Authority sufficient money each year to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds issued under this Resolution and the Indenture, and the City is to provide the cost of maintaining the Facilities in good repair, the cost of keeping the Facilities properly insured, and any payments required for taxes and any expenses incurred by the Authority in connection with the Facilities. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9), the public sale requirements do not apply to the sale of the Bonds since the Authority has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc. as independent financial advisors. The Board has received an offer from the City (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ plus accrued interest on all Bonds to the day of delivery and payment, on the further terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and set forth in the Indenture. The offer is hereby accepted, and the Chair and the Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the Authority for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. Section 2. BOND TERMS; REGISTRATION: EXECUTION AND DELIVERY. 2.01. Issuance of Bonds. For the purpose of paying the costs of the acquisition, construction and furnishing of the Facilities, this Board hereby authorizes the issuance of the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $16,360,000. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to hap pmand to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Board to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 2.02.Jerms of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be designated "Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations)." The terms .of the Bonds, including without limitation, the date of original issue, interest payment dates, maturity dates and principal amounts, interest rates, redemption provisions, and provisions for registration and exchange shall be as set forth in Articles II and III of the Indenture which are incorporated herein by reference. 2.03. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be executed by the Authority, and authenticated and delivered by the Trustee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of Article II of the Indenture which are incorporated herein by reference. 2.04. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be printed in substantially the form set forth in Section 2.01 of the Indenture. SECTION 3. APPROVAL OF GROUND LEASE; LEASE AGREEMENT; INDENTURE. The form of the Ground Lease, and the form of the Lease Agreement and the Indenture, are hereby approved. The Chair and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver said documents in the name and on behalf of the Authority with such -2- variations, omissions and insertions as the Chair and Secretary shall approve, which approval shall be conclusively presumed by the execution and delivery of said documents by the Chair and Secretary. SECTION 4. REGISTRATION OF BONDS. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such additional information as required, and to obtain from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been duly entered upon the County Auditor's bond register. SECTION 5. AUTHENTICATION OF TRANSCRIPT. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, the attorneys rendering an opinion as to the legality thereof, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to the Bonds and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds, as the same appear from the books and records in their custody and,control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, affidavits and certificates, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the Authority as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. SECTION 6. OFFICIAL STATEMENT. An Official Statement relating to the Bonds, prepared and delivered on behalf of the Authority by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., has been received and is hereby approved. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the Authority to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the Authority shall deliver to the Purchaser sufficient copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as, may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency thereof. Adopted this 17U' day of June, 2014 Chair Attest: Secretary Upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. Commissioners and the following voted against the same: whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -3- COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on June 17, 2014, by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $16,360,000 Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations), Series 2014, dated as of July 15, 2014. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 52014. County Auditor (SEAL) GROUND LEASE BETWEEN l CITY OF EDINA, AS LESSOR EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AS LESSEE Dated as of July 1, 2014 This instrument drafted by: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (JPG) 50 South Sixth Street Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 GROUND LEASE THIS GROUND LEASE is made and entered into as of July 1, 2014 between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, "as lessor (the "City ") .and .the EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MINNESOTA, a body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, as lessee (the "Authority "). 1. Leased Premises. City does hereby demise and lease to the Authority, and the Authority does hereby hire and take from City, all of that portion of certain tracts or parcels of land situated in the City of Edina, and State of Minnesota more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof on which portion of land the recreational facilities of the City described on Exhibit B are to be located. (the "Facilities "), together with all rights, privileges, easements and appurtenances belonging or in any way appertaining thereto (the "Leased Premises "): 2. Term. The term of this Ground Lease (the "Term ") shall be for thirty (30) years commencing July 1, 2014; provided that the Term shall automatically expire without the necessity of further documentation on such earlier date as no Bonds (the "Bonds ") remain Outstanding pursuant to the terms of the Trust Indenture (Recreational Facilities) (the "Trust Indenture ") dated as of July 1, 2014, and between the Authority and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the "Trustee "). 3. Rent. The Authority shall pay to City, during the Term, rent in the amount of $1.00 per year, commencing on the first day of the Term and on each anniversary of the first day of the Term. 4. Lease Agreement. To provide for the payment of the Bonds the Authority will enter into the Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Lease "), between the Authority, as lessor, and the City of Edina (the "City "), as lessee, relating to the Leased Premises and the Facilities located thereon. Under the Trust Indenture all right, title and interest of the Authority in this Ground Lease and the Lease will be assigned to the Trustee as securities for the payment of the Bonds. 5. Title to Improvements. The Facilities shall be and remain the property of the City subject to the rights of the Authority under this Ground Lease and the City under the Lease until the expiration of the Term. Upon the expiration of the Term, any rights of the Authority in the Facilities shall automatically and without further act on the part of the Authority or City shall terminate. 6. Assigmnent and Subletting. Other than the assignment of this Ground Lease and the Lease by the Authority to the Trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture, so long as the Lease has not been terminated in accordance with its terms by either the Authority or the -City, the Authority shall not assign this Ground Lease, or sublet the Leased Premises, or mortgage, pledge or hypothecate any interest in this Ground Lease, voluntarily or involuntarily, by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of City, which consent may be withheld for any reason or for no reason. If the. Lease has been terminated, and the Term of this Ground Lease has not expired. pursuant to the provisions of Section ,2 hereof, the Authority may freely assign this Ground Lease, sublet. the Leased Premises, or mortgage, I pledge or hypothecate any interest in this Ground Lease. 7.. Assignment by City. The City's interest in this Ground Lease shall be assignable, and thereafter the obligations of City arising or accruing under this Ground Lease after. an assignment by City shall be enforceable only against the assignee. Any such assignment shall be subject to the rights of the Authority hereunder and- the rights of all persons or entities claiming through the Authority. 8. Default. For purposes of this Ground Lease, the term "Event of Default" shall mean and include any of the following: A. Rent. A default in the payment of any rent when due hereunder, which default continues for a period of 10 days after written notice of such default from City to the Authority. B. Other Defaults. A default in the performance or observance by the Authority of any of the covenants, obligations, agreements or conditions of this Ground Lease not described in paragraph A, which default continues for a period of 30 days after written notice of such default by City to the Authority, or if such default cannot reasonably be cured within a- period of 30 days; which default is not cured within the time reasonably necessary to cure such default: Upon. occurrence of an Event of Default, the City may take whatever action at law or in equity may.appear necessary or desirable to collect the amounts then due or to become due, or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement or covenant of the Authority under this Ground Lease, but this Ground Lease shall not terminate except in accordance with Section 2 hereof. 9. Quiet Enjoyment. The City hereby represents and warrants that it is the lawful owner of the Leased Premises and that it has full right and power to make this Ground Lease. The City further represents and warrants that the Leased Premises is not subject to any dedication, easement, right of way, reservation in patent, covenant, condition, restriction, lien or encumbrance which would prohibit or materially interfere with the construction of the Facilities on the Leased Premises or the use and operation of the Facilities for recreation purposes after completion of construction. 10. No Personal Liability. It is agreed that the members, directors, officers, managers, employees, agents or representatives of the City and the Authority shall have no personal liability to pay any indebtedness hereunder or to perform any covenant contained herein, and that no personal liability or personal responsibility of any sort is assumed by, nor shall at any time be asserted or enforceable against, said members, directors, officers, managers, employees, agents -2- or representatives. Each,party and all persons claiming by, through or under such party hereby expressly waive and release all such personal liability. 11. Notices. Any notice or election herein required or permitted to be given or served by either party hereto .upon the other, shall be deemed given or served in accordance with the provisions of this Ground Lease if delivered"to an officer of such other party hereto and his or her receipt obtained therefor, or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed to such other party at the address hereinafter specified or if delivered to a nationally recognized overnight courier service. Unless and until changed by notice as herein provided, notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: If to, City: City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: City Manager If to the Authority: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: Executive Director Each such mailed notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given to, or served upon, the party to which addressed, on the date one day after the same is deposited in the United States registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, or overnight express, or to such nationally recognized overnight courier service, properly addressed in the manner above provided. Each such delivered notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given to, or served upon, the party to whom delivered upon. delivery thereof in.the manner above provided. Either party may change the address and/or person to whom directed to which mailed notice is to be sent to it by giving to the other party hereto not less than 10 days advance written notice thereof. 12. Captions. The paragraph headings incorporated in this Ground Lease are for convenience only,, are' not a part of this Ground Lease, and shall not be considered in the interpretation of this Ground Lease. 13. Recordation of Ground Lease. City or the Authority may, at its option and expense, cause this Ground Lease or a memorandum hereof to be filed for record in the office.of the County Recorder for County of Hennepin. 14. Modifications. None of the covenants, provisions, terms or conditions of this Ground Lease to be kept or performed by City or the Authority shall be in any manner modified, waived or abandoned, except by written instrument duly signed and delivered by City and the Authority with the same formalities as this Ground Lease has been executed. -3- 15. Severability. If any term, condition or provision of this Ground Lease or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder thereof and the application of such term, provision and condition to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom it shall be held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and this Ground Lease and all the terms, provisions and conditions hereof shall, in all other respects, continue to be effective and to be complied with to the full extent permitted by law. 16. Binding ms. All of the terms, covenants, provisions and conditions of this Ground Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 17. Counterparts. This Ground Lease may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. IN IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY And CITY OF EDINA :A Mayor Chair Secretary And Manager -5- STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. HENNEPIN COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of July, 2014, by James Hovland and Ann Swenson, as the Chair of the Board of Commissioners and Secretary, respectively, of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. Notary Public (Notarial Seal) STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. HENNEPIN COUNTY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 2014 by James Hovland and Scott Neal, the Mayor and the City Manager, respectivelyof the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council (Notarial Seal) Notary Public 3� EXHIBIT A The real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota described as. follows: A -1 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES In LEASE AGREEMENT between the EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY As Lessor and CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA As Lessee Dated as of July 1, 2014 This instrument drafted by: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (JPG) 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS ................................................ ............................... 2 Section1.1. Definitions ............................................................................. ............................... Section1.2. Exhibits ......................................................:.......................... ............................... 5 ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND COVENANTS OF THE CITY AND THE AUTHORITY.......................................................................................... ..............................6 Section 2.1. Representations and Covenants of the City .......................... ............................... 6 Section 2.2. Representations and Covenants of the Authority .................. ............................... 7 ARTICLE III CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITIES ............................... ............................... 8 Section 3.1. City to Act as Agent .............................................. ............................... ................ Section 3.2. Project Costs; Payment of Costs ............................................. ..............................8 Section3.3. City's Liability ...................................................................... ............................... 8 ARTICLEIV LEASE ...................................................................................... ............................... 9 Section4.1. Term of Lease ....................................................................... ............................... 9 Section 4.2. Termination'of Lease Term .................................................. ............................... 9 Section 4.3. Possession and Enjoyment .................................................... ............................... 9 Section 4.4. Authority Access to Facilities .......................................... ............................... 9 ARTICLE V RENTAL PAYMENTS; FEES AND EXPENSES .................. ............................... 10 Section5.1. Rental Payments .............................................:.................... ............................... 10 Section 5.2. Rental Payments to be Unconditional ................................. ............................... 10 Section5.3. Current Expense .................................................................. ............................... 10 Section 5.4. Termination of Lease .......................................................... ............................... 11 Section 5.5. Intent to Continue Lease - Purchase, Payments; Appropriations ......................... 11 Section 5.6. Effect of Termination .......................................................... ............................... 11 Section 5.7. Additional Rental Payments ............................................... ............................... 12 ARTICLE VI MAINTENANCE; TAXES; INSURANCE; AND OTHER MATTERS .............13 Section 6.1. Maintenance and Modification of Facilities by City .......... ............................... 13 Section 6.2. Taxes, Other Governmental Charges and'Utility Charges .. ............................... 13 Section 6.3. Liability Insurance ............................... :.............................................................. 14 Section6.4. Indemnity ............................................................................ ............................... 14 Section 6.5. Property Insurance .............................................................. ............................... 15 Section 6.6. Worker's Compensation Insurance ..................................... ............................... 16 Section 6.7. Other Insurance and Requirements for All Insurance ......... ............................... 16 Section6.8. Advances ............................................................................. ............................... 16 -i- Section6.9. Liens .................................................................................... ............................... 16 Section 6.10. Financial Statements ........................................................... ............................... 16 Section6.11. Arbitrage Rebate ................................................................. ............................... 16 Section 6.12. Waiver by City of Receipt of Confirmations ..................... ............................... 17 ARTICLE VII DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION AND CONDEMNATION; USE OF NET PROCEEDS 18 Section 7.1. Damage, Destruction and Condemnation ........................... ............................... 18 Section 7.2. Insufficiency of Net Proceeds ............................................. ............................... 18 Section 7.3. Cooperation of Authority .................................................... ............................... 18 Section 7.4. Destruction or Condemnation of Other Property Owned by City ..................... 18 ARTICLE VIII CITY'S EQUIPMENT; WARRANTIES; DISCLAIMER .. ............................... 19 Section 8.1. Installation of City's Equipment ......................................... ............................... 19 Section 8.2. Design of Facilities ............................................................. ....................:.......... 19 Section 8.3. Installation and Maintenance of Facilities .......................... ............................... 19 Section8.4. Warranties ........................................................................... ............................... 19 Section 8.5. Disclaimer of Warranties .................................................... ............................... 19 ARTICLE IX ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLEASING ................................... ............................... 20 Section 9.1. Assignment by Authori ....... ............................... 20 Section 9.2. Assignment and Subleasing by City ................................... ............................... 20 ARTICLE X EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES .......................... ............................... 21 Section 10.1. Events of Default Defined .................................................. ............................... 21 Section 10.2. Remedies on Default ........................................................... ............................... 21 Section 10.3. Surrender of Leased Premises ............................................. ............................... 22 Section10.4. Delay; Notice ...................................................................... ............................... 22 Section 10.5. No Remedy Exclusive ......................................................... ............................... 22 Section 10.6. Agreement to Pay Attorneys' Fees and Expenses .............. ............................... 22 Section 10.7. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver .................. ............................... 23 ARTICLEXI TITLE ..................................................................................... ............................... 24 Section1.1.1. Title ..................................................................................... ............................... 24 Section 11.2. Security Interest .................................................................. ............................... 24 Section 11.3. Purchase of Leased Premises .............................................. ............................... 24 Section 11.4. Negative Covenant Regarding Filing of Debtor Termination Statement .......... 25 ARTICLE XII ADMINISTRATIVE -PROVISIONS .................................... ............................... 26 Section12.1. Notices ................................................................................ ............................... 26 Section12.2. Binding Effect ..................................................................... ............................... 26' Section12.3. Severability ......................................................................... ............................... 26 -ii - Section 12.4. Amendments, Changes and Modifications ......................... ............................... 26 Section 12.5. Further Assurances and Corrective Instruments .............................................. :. 26 Section 12.6. Execution Counterparts ....................................................... ............................... 26 Section 12.7. Applicable Law ................................................................... ............................... 26 Section12.8. Captions .............................................................................. .........I...................... 26 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND .................................. ............................... 1 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES ................. EXHIBIT C COMPLETION CERTIFICATE .......................... - iii - ............... ............................... 1 ................ ............................... 1 THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, dated as of the 1St day of July, 2014 (the "Lease "), between the EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota; having its principal office and address at Edina City Hall, Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "), and CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota having its main office at the Edina City Hall, Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority hereby leases to the City, and the City hereby hires and takes from the Authority, the recreational Facilities of the City (the "Facilities ") described on Exhibit B attached hereto that is located on the -real estate described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Land ") and for such purpose the City grants to the Authority for the term of this Lease all rights necessary for the Authority to construct, own and lease the Facilities leased to the City (the "Leased Premises "). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Leased Premises unto the City for the Lease Term (as, herein defined), in consideration of the Rental Payments provided in Section 5.1 of this Lease to be paid by the City and the terms, covenants and conditions to be performed and kept by the City. This Lease is granted and accepted upon the following representations, terms, covenants and conditions, and the Authority and the City hereby agree to keep and perform all the terms, covenants and conditions hereof on their part to be kept and performed, as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS Section 1.1. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in. this Section shall, for all purposes of this Lease, have the meanings herein specified: Additional Bonds: Any Additional Bonds issued pursuant to Section 2.10 of the . Indenture. Architect: A licensed architect in the State of Minnesota to be selected -by the City to prepare Plans and Specifications for the Facilities. Authori ty Representative: The Chair or the Secretary of the Authority or any other person authorized to act on behalf of the Authority under or with respect to this Lease, as evidenced by a certificate conferring such authority executed by the Chair, given to Trustee and the City. Bond Fund: The fund so designated and established by the Trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture. Bond Resolution: The resolutions of the Authority adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Authority on June 17, 2014, authorizing the issuance and sale of the Series 2014 Bonds, as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented by any amendments or modifications thereof. Bonds: The Series 2014 Bonds together with any Additional Bonds. Business Day: Any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or other day on which commercial banks in the City in which the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee is located are not open for business. City Representative: The City Manager or any person authorized by law to act on behalf of the City under or with respect to this Lease, as evidenced by a certificate conferring such authority executed by the City Manager and given to the Trustee and the Authority. Code: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now or hereafter amended, and the regulations and revenue rulings and procedures issued pursuant thereto from time to time. Completion Certificate: A certificate in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C executed by the City, stating that the Facilities has been completed in accordance with the Plans and Specifications. Completion Date: With respect to the Facilities, the date upon which a final Completion Certificate is issued with respect thereto by the City and delivered to the Authority and the Trustee. -2- Construction Fund: The fund so designated and established by the Trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture. Contractor: Each contractor, subcontractor or material supplier, to be selected by the City, providing services or materials or both for the acquisition, construction and furnishing of the Facilities. Costs or Project Costs: All costs incurred by the City for the acquisition, remodeling, renovation and installation of the Facilities as specified in Section 4.3 of the Trust Indenture. Environmental Law: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42. U.S.C. §9601 et se q.; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6901 et sea.; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. .§1804 et seq., the Federal Water Potlution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 etetseQ., the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1321 et sec . the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.; the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter I I5B, the Minnesota Petroleum Tank Release Cleanup Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115C, and any other federal, state, City, municipal, local or other statute, law, ordinance or regulation which may relate to or deal with human health or the environment, all as may be from time to time amended. Event of Default: An Event of Default as described in Section 10.1 hereof or in Section 7.1 of the Indenture which has not been cured. Facilities: The recreation Facilities, including fixtures and furnishings, described on Exhibit B hereto. Fiscal Year Each twelve -month fiscal period of the City commencing on January 1 of any year and ending on December 31 of said year. Ground Lease: The Ground Lease, dated as. of July 1, 2014, between the City, as lessor, and the Authority, as lessee, pursuant to which the City will ground lease a portion of the Land to the Authority,. and any duly authorized and executed amendment thereto. Hazardous Substances: Asbestos, ureaformaldehyde, polychlorinated biphenyls ( "PCBs "), nuclear fuel or material, chemical waste, radioactive material, explosives, known carcinogens, petroleum products and by- products and other dangerous, toxic or hazardous pollutants; contaminants, chemicals, materials or substances listed or identified in, or regulated by, any Environmental Law. Independent Counsel: An attorney duly admitted to the practice of law before the highest court of the State of Minnesota who is not a full -time employee of the Authority or the City. Interest Payment Date: The stated maturity of an installment of interest on any of the Bonds. Land: The real estate described on Exhibit A hereto, upon which the Facilities are located. -3- Lease: This Lease Agreement, and any duly authorized and executed amendment hereto. Leased Premises: The portion of the Land subject to the Ground Lease and the Facilities located thereon which is leased by the Authority to the City pursuant to this Lease. Net Proceeds: Any insurance proceeds or condemnation award paid with respect to the Facilities, remaining after payment therefrom of all expenses incurred inthe collection thereof. Outstanding: When used as of any particular time with reference to Bonds, means (subject to the provisions of Section 9.3 of the Indenture pertaining to Bonds held by the Authority and the City) all Bonds theretofore authenticated and delivered by the Trustee under the Indenture except: (i) Bonds theretofore canceled by the Trustee or surrendered to the Trustee for cancellation; (ii) Bonds for the payment or redemption of which funds or direct obligations of or obligations fully guaranteed by the United. States of America in the necessary amount shall have theretofore been - deposited with the Trustee (whether upon or prior to the maturity or the redemption date of such Bonds); provided that if such Bonds are to be redeemed prior to the maturity thereof, notice of such redemption shall have been given pursuant to Article III of the Indenture, or provision satisfactory to the Trustee shall have been made for the giving of such notice; and (iii) Bonds in lieu of or in substitution for which other Bonds shall have been authenticated and delivered by the Trustee pursuant to the terms of Section 2.8 of the Indenture pertaining to replacement, of Bonds. Portent Date: The date upon which any Rental Payment is due and payable as provided in Section 5.1 hereof. Permitted Encumbrances: As of any particular time: (i) liens for taxes and assessments not then delinquent, or which the City may, pursuant to provisions of Article VI hereof, permit to remain unpaid, (ii) the Ground Lease; (iii) this Lease and the Trust Indenture, (iv) any mechanic's, laborer's, materialmen's, supplier's or vendor's lien or right not filed or perfected in the manner prescribed by law, (v) such minor defects, irregularities, encumbrances, easements, rights-of-way and clouds on title as normally exist with respect to properties similar in character to the Land and do not, in the opinion of Independent Counsel, materially impair the property affected thereby for the purpose for which it was intended; or (v) easements, restrictions or encumbrances, if any, shown on Exhibit A hereto. Plans and Specifications: Architectural and engineering drawings and specifications prepared by the Architect describing the Facilities and any changes thereto approved by the City. Principal Payment Date: The stated maturity of principal of any Bond. Purchase Price: The amount necessary to defease to the earliest permissible redemption date the remaining Outstanding principal amount of Bonds, together with an amount equal to the Authority's and Trustee's. fees and expenses in connection with such defeasance and redemption. Rental Payment: Any payment due from the City to the Authority under Section 5.1 of this Lease. Series 2014 Bonds: The $ Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligation), to be issued by the Authority pursuant to the Trust Indenture. State: The State of Minnesota. State and Federal Law or Laws: The Constitution and laws of the State, and any ordinance, rule or regulation of any agency or political subdivision ,of the State; and any law of the United States, and any rule or regulation of any executive department or federal agency. Term of the Lease or Lease Term: The period during which this Lease remains in effect as specified in Sections 4.1 and 4.2. Trustee: U.S. Bank National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, and any successor thereto. Trust Indenture: The Trust Indenture dated as of the date hereof, between the Authority and the Trustee, and any duly authorized and executed amendment thereto. Section 1.2. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached to and by reference made a part of this Lease: Exhibit A: A legal description of the Land. Exhibit B: A description of the Facilities. Exhibit C: A form of Completion Certificate. %is ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND COVENANTS OF THE CITY AND THE AUTHORITY Section 2.1. Representations and Covenants of the City. The City represents and covenants as follows: (a) The Constitution and the laws of the State authorize the City to enter into this Lease and the transactions contemplated hereby; and to carry out its obligations under this Lease. (b) The officers of the City executing this Lease are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease under the Constitution and laws of the State. (c) The City has complied and will comply with all open meeting laws, all public bidding laws and all other State and Federal Laws applicable to this Lease and the remodeling and renovation of the Facilities. (d) The City will use the Facilities during the Lease Term only to perform essential governmental functions of the City, and will not enter into any "sublease, use agreement, management agreement or other contract which would cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. (e) The execution and delivery of this Lease and the other agreements contemplated hereby to which the City is a party and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and the fulfillment of the terms hereof and thereof will not conflict with, or constitute on the part of the City a breach of, or a default under, any existing (i) law, or (ii) provisions of any legislative act or other proceeding establishing or relating to the establishment of the City or its affairs or its resolutions, or (iii) agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or other instrument to which the City is subject or is a party or by which it is bound. (f) No officer of the City who is authorized to take part in any manner in making this Lease or any contract contemplated hereby has a personal financial interest in or has personally and financially benefitted from this Lease or any such contract. (g) There is not pending or overtly threatened any suit, action or proceeding against or affecting the City before or by any court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other governmental authority which materially and adversely affects the validity, as to the City, of this Lease, any of the obligations of the City hereunder or any of the transactions contemplated hereby. (h) No event of nonappropriation or other financing lease termination has occurred in connection with any prior lease financing by the City. (i) The Facilities are essential for the carrying out of the governmental purposes of the City. Section 2.2. Representations and Covenants of the Authority. The Authority represents and covenants as follows: (a) The Constitution and the laws of the State authorize the Authority to undertake the construction, remodeling, renovation and furnishing of the Facilities, to enter into this Lease and the transactions contemplated hereby, and to carry out its obligations under this Lease. (b) The officers of the Authority executing this Lease are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease under the Constitution and laws of the State. (c) The Authority has complied and will comply with all open meeting laws, all' public bidding laws and all other State and Federal Laws applicable to this Lease and the remodeling and renovation of the Facilities. (d) So long as any of the Bonds remain Outstanding, the Authority will not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement or other contract which would cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" pursuant to Section 141 of the Code.. 3rd (e) The execution and delivery of this Lease and the other agreements contemplated hereby to which the Authority is a party and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and the fulfillment of the terms hereof and thereof will not conflict with, or constitute on the part of the Authority a breach of, or a default under, any existing (i) law, or (ii) provisions of any legislative act or other proceeding establishing or relating to-the establishment of the Authority or its affairs or its resolutions, or (iii) agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or other instrument to which the Authority is subject or is a party or by which it is bound. (f) No officer of the Authority who is authorized to take part in any manner in making this Lease or any contract contemplated hereby has a personal financial interest in or has personally and financially benefited from this Lease or any such contract. (g) There is not pending or threatened any suit, action or proceeding against or affecting the Authority before or by any court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other governmental authority which materially and adversely affects the validity, as to the Authority, of this Lease, any of the obligations of the Authority hereunder or any of the transactions contemplated hereby- -7- ARTICLE III CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITIES Section 3.1. City to Act as Agent. The Authority hereby irrevocably appoints the City as its agent in connection with the acquisition, construction and furnishing of the Facilities. The City, as agent of the Authority, will enter into a contract with such Contractors as may be necessary and desirable to provide for the Facilities in accordance with the Plans and Specifications. The City has caused or shall cause the Architect to prepare the Plans and Specifications for the Facilities, and shall ensure that such Plans and Specifications comply with applicable State law. Section 3.2. Project Costs: Payment of Costs. The Authority shall, upon the issuance of the Series 2014 Bonds deposit or cause to be deposited with the Trustee the. sum of $ from the proceeds of the Series 2014 Bonds (being the principal amount of $ plus a reoffering premium of $ , less $ underwriter's discount. All of such moneys shall be deposited in the Construction Fund. All such moneys shall be administered by .,'V t,. he: Trustee as provided in the Trust Indenture. The City reserves the right to modify or add items :to the Facilities. No such change in the Facilities shall increase the amount of moneys required to be deposited by the Authority pursuant to this Lease, or alter the schedule of Rental Payments. The moneys on hand from time to time in the Construction Fund held by the Trustee shall be made available to City for payment of the Project Costs, in the manner provided in the Trust Indenture. Section 3.3. City's Liability. As between the Authority and the City, the City assumes liability for all risks of loss during the renovation, remodeling and furnishing of the Facilities. The City shall maintain, or require the Contractors to maintain, in force during the entire acquisition, delivery and installation period of the Facilities, payment and performance bonds in amounts not less than the amounts of any contracts with any Contractor entered into with respect to the Facilities, builder's risk or property damage insurance in an amount not less than the full value of all work done and materials and equipment provided or delivered by the Contractor, comprehensive liability insurance, worker's compensation insurance and other insurance required by law or customarily maintained with respect to like projects during the course of acquisition and construction. -8- ARTICLE N LEASE Section 4.1. Term of Lease. This Lease shall be and remain in effect with respect to the Facilities for a Lease Term commencing on the date hereof and continuing until no Bonds remain Outstanding, or until terminated as provided in Section 4.2. Section 4.2. Termination of Lease Term. The Term of the Lease will terminate prior to February 1, 2035 upon the occurrence of the first of the, following events: (a) termination of this Lease pursuant to Section 5.4 hereof; (b) a default by the City and the Authority's election to terminate this Lease pursuant to Article X; or (c) the payment by the City of the Purchase Price pursuant to Section 11.3 hereof, together with any fees and expenses due the Authority or the Trustee hereunder or under the -Trust Indenture. Section 4.3. Possession and Enjoyment. The Authority hereby covenants with respect to the Leased Premises to provide the City during the Term of the Lease with quiet use and enjoyment of the Leased Premises and the City shall during such Lease Term peaceably and quietly have and hold and enjoy the Leased Premises, without suit, trouble or hindrance from the Authority, except as expressly set forth in this Lease. The Authority will, at the request of the City and at the City '..s cost, join in any legal action in which the City asserts its right to such possession and enjoyment to the extent the Authority may lawfully do so.. Section 4.4. Authority Access to Facilities. The City agrees that the Authority and any Authority Representative shall. have the right at all reasonable times to enter upon and to examine and inspect the Facilities. The City further agrees that the Authority and any Authority Representative shall have such rights of access to the Facilities as may be reasonably necessary to cause the proper maintenance of the Facilities in the event of failure by the City to perform its obligations hereunder, or to carry out the Authority's obligations and exercise the Authority's rights under Article X, or to determine whether the City is in compliance with this Lease. - ARTICLE V RENTAL PAYMENTS; FEES AND EXPENSES Section 5.1. Rental Payments. The City shall, by wire transfer or ACH (automated clearing house) in immediately available funds, pay.Rental Payments with respect to the Facilities as follows: (a) On or before each Interest Payment Date the City shall pay an amount equal to the interest, and principal, if any, due on the Bonds on the such Interest Payment Date. (b) As a credit against the first interest payment otherwise required to be paid by the City to the Trustee pursuant to (a) of this Section 5. 1, there shall be applied the proceeds of the Series 2014 Bonds initially deposited into the Bond Fund. (c) On each February 1 and August 1, so long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, the City shall have a credit against the Rental Payment otherwise due on said date to the extent of any investment profits or earnings which have been transferred or are otherwise available in the Bond Fund for such purpose. (d) In the event the City shall have paid Rental Payments with respect to an Interest Payment Date, but the funds on deposit in the Bond Fund are nevertheless . insufficient to pay such principal, premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds then due or to become due on such Interest Payment Date, the City will forthwith pay as Rental Payments the amount of the deficiency. The Rental Payments provided for in this Section 5.1 shall be paid directly to the Trustee at its corporate trust office for the account of the City for deposit in the Bond Fund as provided in the Indenture. Section 5.2. Rental Payments to be Unconditional. Except as provided in Section 5.4, the obligation of the City to make Rental Payments due with respect to the Facilities or any other payments required hereunder shall be absolute and unconditional in all events. Notwithstanding any dispute between the City and the Authority,or any other person, the City shall make all Rental Payments and other payments required hereunder when due and shall not withhold any Rental Payment or other payment pending final resolution of such dispute nor shall the City assert any right of set -off or counterclaim against its obligation to make such Rental Payments or other payments required under;this Lease. The City's obligation to make Rental Payments or other payments during the Lease Term shall not be abated through accident or unforeseen circumstances including, without limitation, any circumstance related to the Facilities or the construction thereof. Section 5.3. Current Expense. The obligations of the City under this Lease, including its obligation to pay the Rental Payments due with respect to the Facilities in any Fiscal Year for which this Lease is in effect, shall constitute a current expense of the City for such Fiscal Year and shall not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of the Constitution and -10- laws of the State (except the amount of the Lease shall be included in.the calculation of net debt for purposes of Minnesota Section 475.53, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.71). Nothing herein shall constitute a pledge by the City of any taxes or other moneys, other than moneys lawfully appropriated from time to time by or for the benefit of the City's annual budget and the proceeds of the Bonds or Net Proceeds of the Facilities, to the payment of any Rental Payment or other amount coming due hereunder. Section 5.4. Termination of Lease. The City shall have the right to cancel and terminate this Lease, in whole but not in part, at the end of any Fiscal Year of the City, in the manner and subject to the terms specified in this Section and Section 5.6, if.the City's governing body does not appropriate moneys sufficient to pay the Rental Payments coming due in the next Fiscal Year. Lack of a sufficient appropriation shall be evidenced by a specific provision in the budget of the City which prohibits the expenditure of the City funds for this purpose. The City may effect such termination by giving the Authority a written notice of termination and by paying to the Authority any Rental Payments which are due and have not been paid-at or before the end of its then current Fiscal Year. The City shall endeavor to give notice of termination not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the end of such Fiscal Year, and shall notify the Authority of any anticipated termination. In the event of termination of this Lease as provided. in this Section, the City shall deliver possession of the Facilities to the Authority in accordance with Section 10.3, and release its interest in the Facilities granted under this Lease within ten (10) days after the termination of this Lease. The Authority may not terminate this Lease except as provided, in Article X hereof upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default by the City. Section 5.5. Intent to Continue Lease - Purchase Payments; Appropriations. The City presently intends to continue this Lease for its entire Term and to pay all. Rental Payments required hereunder. The City Manager and Finance Director will include in the budget request for each Fiscal Year the Rental Payments to become due in such Fiscal Year, and will use all reasonable and lawful means at their disposal to secure the appropriation of money for such Fiscal, Year sufficient to pay the Rental Payments coming due therein. The City reasonably believes that moneys in an amount sufficient to make all such Rental Payments can and will lawfully be appropriated and made available for this purpose. To provide the funds necessary to make the Rental Payments, the City agrees, subject to the provisions of Section 5.4, that it will include in each annual budget an appropriation sufficient therefor. Section 5.6. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Lease as provided in Section 5.4, the City shall not be responsible for the payment of any additional Rental Payments coming due with respect to succeeding Fiscal Years, but if the City has not delivered possession of the Leased Premises to the Authority in accordance with Section 10.3 and conveyed to the Authority or released its interest in the Leased Premises granted under this Lease within ten (10) days after the termination of the, Lease, the termination shall nevertheless be effective, but the City shall be responsible for the payment of damages in an amount equal to the amount of the Rental Payments thereafter coming due which are attributable to the number of days after such ten (10) day period during which the City fails to take such actions. Upon termination of this Lease as provided in Section 5.4, the Trustee, on behalf of the Authority, may take any of the actions specified in Section 10.2 hereof. - 11 - Section 5.7. Additional Rental Payments. The. City shall during the Lease Term, within ten (10) Business Days after written notice that such payment is due, also pay the following amounts of additional rent to the following persons: (a) to the Trustee, all reasonable fees and expenses of the Trustee for services rendered under the Trust Indenture, provided that the City may, without creating a default hereunder, contest in good faith the reasonableness of any such fees or expenses other than the Trustee's fees for ordinary services as may be set forth in the Trust Indenture; (b) to the Authority, all reasonable expenses incurred by the Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby which are not otherwise required to be paid by the City under the terms of this Lease; (c) to the United States, on behalf of the Authority, all payments of the rebate amount required to be paid by the City pursuant to Section 6.11 hereof and all fees and expenses; if any, incurred by the Authority and the Trustee relating to the calculation and payment of the rebate. amount in accordance with the provisions of the Rebate Certificate .referred to in said Section 6.11; (d) all other costs and expenses specifically required to be paid by the City under the terms of this Lease or the Trust Indenture; and (e) to the Authority or the Trustee, as the case may be, the amount of all advances of funds made by either of them under the provisions hereof. In the event the City should fail to make any of the payments required by this Section, the item in default shall continue as an obligation of the City until the amount in default shall have been fully paid, and the City will pay the same with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum, or, if less, at the maximum rate permitted by law. -12- ARTICLE VI MAINTENANCE; TAXES; INSURANCE; AND OTHER MATTERS Section 6.1. Maintenance and Modification of Facilities by, City. From and after the Completion Date the City shall, at its own expense, maintain, preserve and keep.the Facilities in good repair, working order and condition, and shall from time to time make all repairs,, replacements and improvements necessary to keep the Facilities in such condition. The Authority shall have no responsibility for any of these repairs, replacements. or improvements. In addition, the City shall, at its own expense, have the right to remodel the Facilities or to make additions, modifications and improvements thereto. All such additions, modifications and improvements shall thereafter comprise part of the Facilities, shall be the property of the Authority and be subject to the provisions of this Lease. Such additions, modifications and improvements shall not in any way damage the Facilities nor cause it to be used for purposes other than those authorized under the provisions of State and Federal Law, and the Facilities, upon completion of any additions, modifications and improvements made pursuant to this Section, shall be of a value not less than the value of the Facilities immediately prior to the making of such additions, modifications and improvements. The City will not permit any mechanic's or other lien to be established or remain against the Facilities for labor or materials furnished in connection with any remodeling, additions, modifications, improvements, repairs, renewals or replacements made by the City pursuant to this Section; provided that if any such lien is established and the City shall first notify the Authority of the City's intention to do so, the City may in good faith contest any, lien filed or established against the Facilities; and in such event may permit the items so contested to remain undischarged and unsatisfied during the period of such contest and any appeal therefrom unless the Authority shall notify the City that, in the opinion of Independent Counsel, by nonpayment of any such item the interest of the Authority in the Facilities will be materially endangered or the Facilities or-any part thereof will be subject to loss or forfeiture, in which event the City shall promptly pay and cause to be satisfied and discharged all such unpaid items or provide the Authority with full security against any such loss or forfeiture, in form satisfactory to the Authority. The Authority will cooperate fully with the City in any such contest, upon the request and at the expense of the City. Section 6.2. Taxes Other Governmental Charges and Utility Charges. The City shall also pay when due all gas, water, steam, electricity, heat, power, telephone, and other charges incurred in the operation, maintenance, use, occupancy and upkeep of the Facilities. The City shall also pay all property and excise taxes and governmental charges of any kind whatsoever which may at any time -be lawfully assessed or levied against or with respect to the Facilities, which become due during the Term of the Lease, and all special assessments and charges lawfully made by any governmental body for public improvements that may be secured by a lien on the Facilities; provided that with respect to special assessments or other governmental charges that may lawfully be paid in installments over a period of years, the City shall be obligated to pay only such installments as are required to be paid during the Term of the Lease as and when the same become due. The City shall not be required to pay any federal, state or local income, inheritance, estate, succession, transfer, gift, franchise, gross receipts, profit, excess profit, capital I stock, corporate, or other similar tax payable by the Authority, its successors or assigns, unless such tax is made in lieu of or as a substitute for any real estate or other tax upon the Facilities. -13- The City may, at the City's expense and in the City's name, in good faith contest any such taxes, assessments, utility and other charges and, in the event of any such contest, may permit the :taxes, assessments or other charges so contested to remain unpaid during the period of such contest and any appeal therefrom unless the Authority shall notify the City that, in the opinion of Independent Counsel, by nonpayment of any such items the interest of the Authority in the Facilities will be materially endangered or the Facilities or any part thereof will be subject to loss or forfeiture, in which event the City, shall promptly pay such taxes, assessments or charges or provide the Authority with full � security against any loss which may result from nonpayment, in form satisfactory to the Authority. Section 6.3. Liabilily Insurance. The City shall procure and maintain continuously in effect with respect to the Facilities, insurance against liability for injuries to or death of any person or damage to or loss of property arising out of or in any way relating to the maintenance, use or operation of the Facilities or any part thereof, and will cause the Contractors to maintain similar insurance against all similar liabilities on their part prior to the Completion'Date. The Net Proceeds of all such insurance shall be applied toward extinguishment or satisfaction of the liability with respect -to which the insurance proceeds may be paid. As an alternative to the purchase of liability insurance, the City may self - insure against such liabilities in accordance with applicable law. Section 6.4. Indemni . (a) The City assumes all risks and liabilities, whether or not covered by insurance, for loss or damage to the Facilities and for injury to or death of any person or damage to any property, whether such injury or death be with respect to agents or employees of the City or of third parties, and whether such property damage be to the City's property or the property of others, which is proximately caused by the negligent conduct of the City, its officers, employees and agents. The City hereby assumes responsibility for and agrees to reimburse the Authority, the Trustee, their officers, agents or employees, for all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, claims, actions, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) of whatsoever kind and nature, imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the Authority, the Trustee, their officers, agents or employees, that in any way relate to or arise out of the acquisition and construction of the Facilities, the operation.and maintenance of the Facilities, the execution and performance.of this Lease or the authorization, execution and delivery of the Bonds, to the maximum extent permitted by law. (b) , To the maximum extent permitted by law, the City hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Authority, the Trustee and their officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Indemnitees ") from and against, and shall reimburse each such Indemnitees for, any and all loss, claim, liability, damage, judgment, penalty, injunctive relief, injury to person, property or natural resources, cost, expense, action or cause of action arising in connection with or as the result of any past, present or future existence, use, handling, storage, transportation, manufacture, release or disposal of any Hazardous Substance in, on or under the Land, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, regardless of the source, the time of occurrence or the time of discovery (hereafter collectively referred to as "Loss "). -14- The foregoing indemnification against Loss includes, without limitation, indemnification against all costs in law or in equity`of removal, response, investigation, or remediation of any kind, and disposal of such Hazardous Substances, all costs of determining whether the Land is in compliance with, and of causing the Land to be in compliance with, all applicable Environmental Laws, all costs associated with claims for damages to .persons, property, or natural resources, and the Indemnitees' reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, court costs and expenses incurred in connection with any thereof. (c) The obligations of the City to indemnify the, Indemnitees shall survive satisfaction and payment in full of the Bonds, or termination of this Lease. The rights of the Indemnitees hereunder shall be in addition to any other rights and remedies which the Indemnitees may have against the Land and the City under this Lease or any other document or at law or in equity. (d) Notwithstanding anything in this Lease to the contrary, if the Authority should subsequently terminate the Lease and reacquire possession of the Facilities (the date on which this event occurs being the "Transfer Date "), the indemnifications described in this Section 6.4 shall not apply to any Loss incurred by the Authority or the Trustee as a direct result 'of affirmative actions of the Authority or the Trustee after the Authority or the Trustee has,acquired possession of the Facilities if such affirmative actions of the Authority or the Trustee are the sole and direct cause of the introduction and initial release of a Hazardous Substance in, on or under the Land or Facilities; provided, however, that the City shall bear the burden of proof that the introduction and initial release of such Hazardous Substance (i) occurred subsequent to the Transfer Date, (ii) did not occur as a result of any action of the City, and (iii) did not occur as a result of a continuing migration or release of any Hazardous Substance introduced prior to the Transfer Date in, on, under or near the Land or Facilities. (e) Except as expressly provided for in this Section 6.4, the indemnifications provided herein shall remain in full force and effect, including, without limitation, with respect to Hazardous Substances which are discovered or released in, on or under the Land or Facilities after the Transfer Date, and with respect to the continuing migration or release of any Hazardous Substance previously introduced in, on, under or near the Land or Facilities. The foregoing limitations shall not affect or impair any rights, remedies or claims the Authority or the Trustee may have outside the scope of this indemnity, at law or in equity, with respect to the City or others. Section 6.5. Properly Insurance. Before and after the Completion Date, the City shall have and assume the risk of loss with respect to the Facilities. The City shall procure and maintain continuously in effect during the Term of the Lease with respect to the Facilities, hazard insurance against all risks of physical loss (including, without limitation, fire, extended coverage perils and vandalism and malicious mischief) in an amount equal to the. full replacement value of the Facilities (and in any event not less than the Outstanding principal amount of the Bonds). The Net Proceeds of Insurance required by this Section shall be applied as provided in Article VII. -15- Section 6.6. Worker's Compensation Insurance. If required by State law, the City shall carry worker's compensation insurance covering all its employees on, in, near or about the Facilities. Alternatively, the City may self - insure against such liabilities in accordance with applicable law. Section 6.7. Other Insurance and Requirements for All Insurance. All insurance by this Article may be carried under a separate policy or a rider or endorsement to an existing policy; shall be taken out and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized. under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to. do business in the State; shall contain a provision that the insurer shall not cancel or revise coverage thereunder without giving written notice to both parties, and to the Trustee, at least. 10: days before the cancellation or revision becomes effective; -and shall name the City, the Authority.and the Trustee as insured parties as their interests may appear. The City shall provide the Trustee annually, commencing December 1, 2010, with a certificate as to compliance with the provisions of this Section 6.7. The Trustee shall be entitled to rely upon said certificate as to the City's compliance with the insurance requirements. The Trustee shall not be responsible for the sufficiency of coverage or amounts of such policies. Section 6.8. Advances. If the City shall fail to perform any, of its obligations under this Lease, the Authority or the Trustee may, but shall not be obligated to take such action as may be necessary to cure such failure, including the advancement of money, and the City shall be obligated to repay all such advances on demand, with interest at the maximum rate permitted by law or 8 %, whichever is less, from the date of the advance to the date of repayment. Section 6.9. Liens. The City shall not, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, encumbrance or claim on or with respect to the Facilities, other than the respective rights of 'the Authority and the City as herein provided and Permitted Encumbrances. Except as expressly provided in this Article, the City shall promptly, at its own expense, take such action as may be necessary duly to discharge or remove any such mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, encumbrance or claim if the same shall arise at any time. The City shall reimburse the Authority for any expense incurred by it in order to discharge or remove any such mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, encumbrance or claim. Section 6.10. Financial Statements. The City shall provide the Trustee and the Authority, within 365 days of the end of each Fiscal Year, with a copy of its annual audited financial statements. Section 6.11. Arbitrage Rebate. The City will comply with all provisions of the Rebate Certificate, dated as of the date of delivery of the Series 2014 Bonds, and executed by the City, the Authority and the Trustee. If required, the City shall pay the rebate amount calculated from time to time in accordance with the provisions of the Rebate Certificate and shall pay, or reimburse to the Authority and the Trustee, all costs and expenses incurred by the Authority and the Trustee, as the case may be, in making such calculations and otherwise carrying out the provisions of the Rebate Certificate. -16- Section 6.12. Waiver by City of Receipt of Confirmations. The City acknowledges that regulations of the Comptroller of the Currency grant the City the right to receive brokerage confirmations of the security transactions as they occur. The City specifically waives such notification to the extent permitted by law and will receive periodic cash transaction statements that will detail all investment transactions. -17- ARTICLE VII DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION AND CONDEMNATION; USE OF NET PROCEEDS Section 7.1. Damage Destruction and Condemnation. If (i) the Facilities or any portion thereof is destroyed or is damaged by fire or other casualty or (ii) title to or the temporary use of the Facilities or any part thereof, or the interest of the City or the Authority in the Facilities or any part thereof, shall be taken under the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any governmental body or by any person, firm or corporation acting under governmental authority, the City shall have the rights specified in this Section with respect to the Net Proceeds of any insurance or condemnation award. The City may either apply such Net Proceeds to the prompt repair, restoration, modification or improvement of the Facilities and shall be obligated to continue to pay the Rental Payments or the City may exercise its option to purchase the Facilities pursuant to the terms of Section 11.3 hereof, in which event the Net Proceeds may be used for such purpose. The City shall notify the Authority and the Trustee within 90 days of the date of damage, destruction or taking as to its decision regarding restoration or purchase. - In the eventthe City determines to repair and restore the Facilities, the Authority shall assign to the City all of its interests in said Net Proceeds and the City shall deposit the Net Proceeds with the Trustee for deposit into the Construction Fund. The Trustee shall disburse such Net Proceeds from the Construction Fund to pay the costs of repair and restoration in the manner provided in Article IV of the Trust Indenture. Section 7.2. Insufficience of Net Proceeds. If the City elects to-repair and restore the Facilities and the Net Proceeds are insufficient to pay in full the cost of any repair and restoration, the City shall complete the work and pay any cost in excess of the amount of the Net Proceeds, and the City agrees that if by reason of any such insufficiency of the Net Proceeds the City shall make any payments pursuant to the provisions of this Section 7.2, the City shall not be entitled to any reimbursement therefor from the Authority nor shall the City be entitled to any diminution of the Rental Payments due with respect to the Facilities. Section 7.3. Cooperation of Authority. The Authority shall cooperate fully with the City at the expense of the City in filing any proof of loss with respect to any insurance policy covering the casualties described in Section 7.1 hereof and in the prosecution or defense of any prospective or pending condemnation proceeding with respect to the Facilities or any part thereof and will, to the extent it may lawfully do so, permit the City to litigate in any proceeding resulting therefrom in the name of and on behalf of the Authority. In no event will the Authority voluntarily settle, or consent to the settlement of, any proceeding arising out of any insurance claim or any prospective or pending condemnation proceeding with respect to the Facilities or any part thereof without the written consent of the City. Section 7.4. Destruction or Condemnation of Other Property Owned by City. The City shall be entitled to the Net Proceeds of any insurance claim or condemnation award or portion thereof made for destruction of, damage to or taking of its property not included in the Facilities. -18- ARTICLE VIII CITY'S EQUIPMENT ;WARRANTIES; DISCLAIMER Section 8.1. Installation of City's Equipment. The City may at any time and from time to time, in its sole discretion and at its'own expense, install items of movable machinery and equipment in or upon the Facilities. All -'such items shall remain the sole property of the City, in which the Authority shall have no interest, and may be modified or removed by the City at any time provided that the City shall repair and restore any and all damage to the Facilities resulting from the installation, modification or removal of any such items. Nothing in this Lease shall prevent the City from purchasing items to be installed pursuant to this Section under a conditional sale or lease with option to purchase contract, or subject to a vendor's lien or security agreement, as security for the unpaid portion of the purchase price thereof, provided4hat no such lien or security interest shall attach to any part of the Facilities. Section 8.2. Design of Facilities. The design of the Facilities, the Architect and the Contractors have been or will be selected by the City, and the Authority shall have no responsibility in connection with the selection thereof, the design of the Facilities, its suitability for the use intended by the City, or the performance by the Architect or the Contractors in acquiring and constructing the Facilities. Section 8.3. Installation and Maintenance of Facilities. The Authority shall have no obligation to install, erect, test, inspect, service or maintain the Facilities, or any portion thereof, under any circumstances, but such actions shall be the obligation of the City in accordance with the provisions of this Lease. Section 8.4. Warranties. The Authority hereby assigns to the City for and during the Term of the Lease, all of its interest, if any, in all warranties and guarantees or other contract rights against the Architect and the Contractors, express or implied, issued on or applicable to the Facilities, and the Authority hereby authorizes the City to obtain the customary services furnished in connection with such warranties and guarantees at the City's expense. Section 8.5. Disclaimer of Warranties. THE AUTHORITY MAKES NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE VALUE, DESIGN, CONDITION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR FITNESS FOR THE USE CONTEMPLATED BY THE CITY OF THE FACILITIES, OR ANY OTHER REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE FACILITIES. -19- ARTICLE IX ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLEASING Section 9.1. Assignment by Authority. The Authority shall not assign its obligations under this Lease, and no purported assignment thereof shall:be effective. All of the Authority's right, title and/or interest in and to this Lease, the Rental Payments and other amounts due hereunder (other than any indemnity payments and reimbursement of costs and expenses) may be assigned to the Trustee and the City hereby consents to the assignment made by the Authority to the Trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture. .Section 9.2. Assignment and Subleasing by City. The City may not assign its rights or obligations under this Lease to any person during the Term of the Lease. The City may not sublease all or any part of the Facilities, or contract for the operation of the Facilities by an entity other than the City, during the Term of the Lease except (i) with the prior written consent of the Authority and (ii) in a manner that will not cause interest on the Bonds the interest on which is not includable in gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes, to become includable in the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes, as evidenced by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel filed with the Authority and Trustee prior to effective date of any such sublease or contract. -20- ARTICLE X EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 1.0.1. Events of Default Defnied. The following shall be "events of default" under this Lease and the terms "eventst of default" and "default" shall mean, whenever they are used in this Lease, with respect to the Facilities, any one or more of the following events: (i) Failure by the City to pay any Rental Payment or other payment required to be paid hereunder at the time specified herein, which failure, other than a failure to pay any Rental Payment at the time specified herein, shall continue for. a period of five days after written notice given to the City by the Trustee on behalf of the Authority. (ii) Failure by the City to observe and perform any covenant, condition or agreement on its part to`be observed or performed, other than as referred to in clause (i) of this Section, for a period of thirty, (30) days after written notice specifying such failure and requesting that it be remedied has been given to the City by the Trustee on behalf of the Authority, unless the Trustee shall agree in writing to an extension of such time prior to its expiration. (iii) The filing by the City of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy; or failure by the City. promptly to lift any execution, garnishment or, attachment of such consequence as would impair the ability of the City to carry on its operations at the Facilities, or `adjudication of the City as a bankrupt, or assignment by the City for the benefit of creditors, or the entry by the City into an agreement of composition with creditors, or the approval by. a court of competent jurisdiction of a petition applicable to City in any proceedings instituted under the provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Statute, as amended, or under any similar acts which may hereafter be enacted. The provisions of this Section 10.1 an d Section 10.2 are subject to the following limitation: if by reason of force majeure the City is unable in whole or in part to carry out its obligations under this Lease with respect to the Facilities, other than the obligation of the City to pay Rental Payments with respect thereto which shall be paid when due notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the City shall not be deemed in default during the continuance of such inability or during any other delays which are a direct consequence of the force majeure inability. The term "force majeure" as used herein shall mean, without limitation; the following: acts of God; strikes, lockouts or other industrial disturbances; acts of public enemies; orders or restraints of any kind of the government of the United States of America of the State of Minnesota or any of its departments, agencies or officials, or any civil or military authority; insurrections; riots; landslides; earthquakes; fires; storms; droughts; floods; explosions; or any other cause or event not reasonably within the control of the City and not resulting from its negligence. The City agrees, however, to remedy with all reasonable dispatch the cause or causes preventing it from carrying out its obligations under this Lease; provided that the settlement of strikes, lockouts and other employment disputes shall be entirely within the discretion of the City. Section 10.2. Remedies on Default. Whenever any event of default referred to in Section 10.1 hereof shall have happened and be continuing with respect to the Facilities, the -21- Trustee, on behalf of the Authority, shall have the right, at its option, to take one or any combination of the following remedial steps: (i) Cancel and terminate this Lease by written notice in accordance with law, reenter and take possession of the Leased Premises and all improvements thereto, and all prior Rental_Payments made hereunder by the City shall belong to the Authority as liquidated damages; and (ii) . Take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to collect the Rental Payments then due and thereafter to become due during the then current.Fiscal Year of the City with respect to the Leased Premises, or enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement or covenant of the City under this Lease; and (iii) Lease or sell the Authority's interests in the Leased Premises or any portion•.thereof in a commercially reasonable manner at public or private sale in accordance with applicable State laws and apply the proceeds of such lease or sale in accordance with Section 7.3 of the Trust Indenture. The Authority,covenants to cooperate with the Trustee upon request in the exercise of any of the foregoing remedies. Section 10.3. Surrender of Leased Premises. Upon the termination of this Lease as aforesaid, the: City shall surrender possession of the Leased Premises to the Authority in the condition, repair, appearance and working order required in Section 6.1. Section 10.4. Delay; Notice. 'No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any _default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof; but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle any party to exercise any remedy reserved to it in this Lease it shall,not be necessary to give any notice, other than such notice as. may be required in this Lease or by law. Section 10.5. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the,Authority is intended to be exclusive and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Lease or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to.be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 10.6. Agreement to Pqy Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. In the event either party to this Lease should default under any of the provisions hereof and the nondefaulting party should employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of moneys or the enforcement or performance or observance of, any obligation or agreement on the part of the defaulting party herein contained, the defaulting party agrees that it will on demand therefor pay to the nondefaulting party the reasonable fee of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by the nondefaulting party. -22- Section 10.7. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. In the event any agreement contained in this Lease should be breached by either party and thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other breach hereunder. -23- ARTICLE XI TITLE Section 11.1. Title. During the Term of the Lease, legal title to the Facilities and any and all repairs, replacements, substitutions and modifications to it shall be in the Authority, subject to the City's interests under this Lease. Section 11.2. Security Interest. The City hereby grants the Authority a security interest in all portions of the Facilities that are funded in whole or in part with proceeds of Bonds and that are deemed personal property or fixtures pursuant to applicable law, whether currently owned or hereafter acquired, the proceeds thereof and all repairs, replacements, substitutions and modifications thereto or thereof, and a security interest in the proceeds of all insurance policies and amounts held in the Funds established pursuant to the Trust Indenture, in order to secure the City's payment of all Rental Payments due during the Term of this Lease and the performance of all other obligations herein to be performed by the City. The City will cause to be executed, filed and recorded all instruments, including financing statements and continuation statements, and will perform such acts as are required to establish and maintain a valid and perfected security interest in such portions of the Facilities. The City shall inform the Trustee in writing within ten (10) days of any change, amendment, or modification of its place of organization, form of organization, or change in the City's name (including, but not by way of limitation, resulting from mergers, acquisitions, tax free exchanges, or other transactions) (all of which are sometimes referred to as "Corporate Changes," regardless of whether the City is organized as a corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, sole proprietorship, or other form of entity recognized under the law of the state in which the City is organized), and the City shall cooperate with the Trustee by executing as soon as reasonably practicable after receipt thereof any and all amendments to.UCC financing statements deemed necessary by the Trustee in insure that the security interest of the Trustee in any and all collateral of the City remains fully perfected. The Trustee may rely on opinions of bond counsel as to whether any or all UCC financing statements of the City need to be amended as a result. If the City fails to provide information to the Trustee about Corporate Changes on a timely basis, the Trustee shall not be liable or responsible to any party for any failure to maintain a perfected security interest in the City's collateral, for which the Trustee needed to have information about the Corporate Changes. The Trustee shall have no duty to inquire about Corporate Changes if the City does not inform the Trustee of such Corporate Changes, the parties acknowledging and agreeing that it would not be feasible or practical for the Trustee to search for information on the Corporate Changes if such information is not provided by the City. The City shall provide the Trustee with copies of any Debtor Termination Statement (as such term is defined in Section 11.4 hereof) the City files in violation of the covenant contained in Section 11.4 hereof. Section 11.3. Purchase of Leased Premises. Except during the continuance of an event of default, the City shall have the option of purchasing the Leased Premises, as follows: -24- (a) The City shall give written notice to the Authority and to the Trustee of its intention to.purchase the Facilities, stating therein a closing date not less than forty (40) nor more than ninety (90) days after the date the notice is mailed, and the City shall make arrangements satisfactory to the Trustee for the giving of any required notice of redemption or notice of defeasance of 'the Bonds in connection with the purchase. (b) The City shall pay to the Trustee, on or before the closing date, an amount equal to the Purchase Price for the Leased Premises. (c) On the closing date, a closing shall be held at the principal office of the Trustee, or any other office mutually agreed upon. At the closing the City and Trustee . shall, upon acknowledgment of receipt of the Purchase Price, execute and deliver to the City a quitclaim deed or bill of sale, as appropriate, to the Leased Premises, and a release or termination of the Ground Lease, and such other documents as the City reasonably determines is necessary to transfer unencumbered title to Land and Leased Premises. At such time as all of the Bonds have been fully paid or provision for payment thereof has been made in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture, and all expenses of the Authority. and Trustee have been paid or provided for to the date of such full.payment.of the Bonds, the City shall be deemed to have purchased all right, title and interest of the Authority in the Leased Premises, this Lease shall be deemed terminated, and title to the Leased Premises shall automatically vest in the City. Nevertheless, the Authority and the Trustee, at the expense of the City, shall execute such bills of sale, quitclaim deeds or other documents of conveyance as shall be reasonably necessary to convey their interest in the Facilities to the City. Section 11.4. Negative Covenant- Regarding Filing of Debtor Termination Statement. The City shall not file or record any instrurrient or document with any entity, officer or office having responsibility for recording of security interests which purports to terminate, vitiate or extinguish a security interest in the collateral in which the Trustee holds a security interest (a "Debtor Termination Statement "). -25- ARTICLE XII ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS Section 12.1. Notices. All notices, certificates or other communications hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall be,- deemed given on the earlier of (i) delivery or (ii) three days following deposit in the United "States mail in certified form -with postage fully prepaid to the addresses shown in the first paragraph hereof. The Authority and the City, by; notice given hereunder, and to the Trustee, may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent. Any notice provided hereunder by the City or the Authority shall also be sent to Trustee at the address given in Section 148 of the Trust Indenture. Section 12.2. Binding Ems. This Lease shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Authority and the City and their respective successors and assigns. Section 12.3. Severability. In the event any provision of this Lease shall be held invalid . or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. Section 12.4. Amendments, Chanizes and Modifications. This Lease may be amended or any of its terms modified only by written amendment authorized and executed by the City and the Authority, and in accordance with Article XII of the Trust Indenture. Section 12.5. Further Assurances and Corrective Instruments. The Authority and the City agree that they will, if necessary, execute, acknowledge and deliver, or cause to be executed, acknowledged and delivered, such supplements hereto and such further instruments as may reasonably be required for correcting any inadequate or incorrect description of the Facilities hereby sold or intended so to be or for carrying out the expressed intention of this Lease. Section 12.6. Execution Counterparts. This Lease may simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 12.7. Applicable Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State. Section 12.8. Captions. The captions or headings in this Lease are for convenience only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or Sections of this Lease. -26- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Lease to be executed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and the City has caused this Lease to be executed in its name by its duly authorized officers as of the date first above written. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LOW Attest: Chair Secretary CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA -27- Mayor City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. HENNEPIN COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of July, 2014, by James Hovland and Ann Swenson, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Minnesota, a Minnesota political subdivision, on behalf of the political subdivision. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. HENNEPIN COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of July, 2014, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, the Mayor the City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public -28- EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND The real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: FEW EXHIBIT B DESCRITION OF FACILITIES IM EXHIBIT C COMPLETION CERTIFICATE The undersigned, being a duly appointed City Representative under the Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014 (the Lease), between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the Authority) and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), hereby certifies on behalf of the City with respect to the Facilities to be acquired and constructed under said Lease, that the Facilities has been acquired and constructed pursuant to and in accordance with said Lease and the Plans and Specifications, and is now available for occupancy and/or use by the City. Dated , 201_ C -1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA City Representative ;e TRUST INDENTURE (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES) between EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY "MT4l U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Dated as of July 1, 2014 Relating to: PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014 (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS) This instrument drafted by: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (JPG) 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION .................................. ..............................4 Section1.1 Definitions ................................................................................. ..............................4 Section 1.2 Additional Provisions as to Interpretation ................................ ..............................7 ARTICLE II FORM, EXECUTION AND REGISTRATION OF BONDS ..... ..............................7 Section 2.1 Form of Series 2014 Bonds ...................................................... ..............................7 Section 2.2 Maturities, Numeration and Interest Payment Dates ............... .............................13 Section 2.3 Execution of Bonds .................................................................. .............................14 Section 2.4 Authentication of Bonds .......................................................... .............................14 Section 2.5 Registration, Transfer and Exchange ................:...................... .............................14 Section 2.6 Payment of Interest on Series 2014 Bonds;, Interest Rights Preserved .................15 Section 2.7 Ownership of Bonds ................................................................ .............................16 Section 2.8 Reissuance of Mutilated, Destroyed, Stolen or Lost Bonds .... .............................17 Section 2.9 Conditions for Authentication of Series 2014 Bonds .............. .............................17 Section 2.10 Authorization of Additional Bonds ........................................ .............................17 Section 2.11 Book- Entry`Only System .... ............................... Section 2.12 Substitute Securities Depository; Termination of Book -Entry Only System .....20 ARTICLE III REDEMPTION OF BONDS ..................................................... .............................20 Section 3.1 Redemption of Series 2014 Bonds ........................................... .............................20 Section 3.2 Notice of Redemption .............................................................. .............................21 Section 3.3 Deposit for Redemption ........................................................... .............................21 Section 3.4 Payment of Redeemed Bonds .................................................. .............................21 Section 3.5 Cancellation of Redeemed Bonds ............................................ .............................22 Section 3.6 Partial Redemption of Bonds ................................................... .............................22 ARTICLE IV BOND PROCEEDS; CONSTRUCTION FUND ...................... .............................23 Section 4.1 Deposit of Series 2014 Bond Proceeds ......................... Section 4.2 Establishment of Construction Fund ............................. Section 4.3 Project Costs Defined .................... ............................... Section 4.4 Payments from Construction Fund ............................... Section 4.5 Deposit and Investment of Construction Fund Moneys Section 4.6 Application of Balance in Construction Fund .............. -i - .......... .............................23 .......... .............................23 .......... .............................23 .......... .............................24 .......... .............................24 .......... .............................25 ARTICLE V DISPOSITION OF PLEDGED REVENUES ............................. .............................25 Section5.1 Bond Fund ................................................................................ .............................25 Section 5.2 Investment of Funds in Bond Fund .......................................... .............................25 ARTICLE VI PARTICULAR COVENANTS OF THE AUTHORITY .......... .............................26 Section6.1 Payment of Bonds .................................................................... .............................26 Section 6.2 Extensions of Payments of Bonds ............................................ ...:.........................26 Section6.3 Authorization ........................................................................... .............................27 Section 6.4 Concerning the Lease ............................................................... .............................27 Section 6.5 To Observe All Covenants and Terms -- Limitations on Authority's Obligations27 Section6.6 Liens ......................................................................................... .............................27 ARTICLE VII EVENTS OF DEFAULT; REMEDIES ................................... .............................27 Section7.1 Events of Default ..................................................................... .............................27 Section 7.2 Enforcement of Covenants and Conditions ............................. ............................28 Section 7.3 Application of Moneys ............................................................ .............................29 Section 7.4 Right of Trustee to Act Without Possession of Bonds ............ .............................30 Section 7.5 Power of Majority of Bondholders .......................................... .............................30 Section 7.6 Limitation on Suits by Bondholders ........................................ .............................30 Section 7.7 Waiver by Bondholders ........................................................... .............................31 Section 7.8 Remedies Cumulative, Delay Not To Constitute Waiver. ********'***"*"*'* ................ 31 Section 7.9 Restoration of Rights Upon Discontinuance of Proceedings ... .............................31 ARTICLE VIII CONCERNING THE TRUSTEE ........................................... .............................31 Section 8.1 Acceptance of Trust and Prudent Performance Thereof ................. Section 8.2 Trustee May Rely Upon Certain Documents and Opinions ........... Section 8.3 Trustee Not Responsible for Indenture Statements, Validity ......... Section 8.4 Limits on Duties and Liabilities of Trustee ..... ............................... 85M H 1d' T t .....................31 .....................33 .....................3 3 Section. oney e m rus ................................................ ............................... Section 8.6 Obligation of Trustee ............................................... ............................... Section 8.7 Notice to Bondholders ............................................. ............................... Section 8.8 Intervention in Judicial Proceedings ........................ ............................... Section 8.9 Further Investigation by Trustee .............................. ............................... Section 8.10 Trustee to Retain Financial Records ...................... ............................... Section 8.11 Compensation of Trustee ....................................... ............................... Section 8.12 Trustee May Hold Bonds ....................................... ....:.......................... Section 8.13 Appointment of Trustee ......................................... ............................... Section 8.14 Merger of Trustee .................................................. ............................... Section 8.15 Resignation or Removal of Trustee ....................... ............................... Section 8.16 Appointment of Successor Trustee ........................ ............................... Section 8.17 Transfer of Rights and Property to Successor Trustee .......................... Section 8.18 Appointment of Successor or Alternate Paying Agent's ....................... -ii - ............34 ............34 ............34 ............34 �4 ............35 ............35 ............35 ............35 ............35 ............36 ............36 ............36 ............37 ............37 ARTICLE IX CONCERNING THE BONDHOLDERS .................................. .............................37 Section 9.1 Execution of Instruments by Bondholders ............................... .............................37 Section9..2 Waiver of Notice ...................................................................... .............................38 Section 9.3 Determination of Bondholder Concurrence ...........................:. .............................38 Section 9.4 Bondholders' Meeting...... ...................................:.................... .............................38 Section 9.5 Revocation by Bondholders ..................................................... .............................40 ARTICLE X PAYMENT, DEFEASANCE AND RELEASE ......................... .............................41 Section 10.1 Payment and Discharge of Indenture ..................................... .............................41 Section 10.2 Bonds Deemed Not Outstanding After Deposits ................... .............................42 Section 10.3 Unclaimed Money to be Returned ......................................... .............................42 ARTICLE XI SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURES .......................................... .............................43 Section 11.1 Purposes for Which Supplemental Indentures May be Executed ....................... 43 Section 11.2 Execution of Supplemental Indenture .................................... .............................44 Section 11.3 Discretion of Trustee :............................................................. .............................44 Section 11.4 Modification of Indenture with Consent of Bondholders ...... .............................44 Section 11.5 Supplemental Indentures to be Part of Indenture ................... .............................45 Section 11.6 Rights of City Unaffected ...................................................... .............................45 Section 11.7 Rights of Authority ................................................................ .............................45 Section 11.8 Notice to Rating Agencies ..................................................... .............................45 ARTICLE XII AMENDMENTS TO THE LEASE ......................................... .............................45 Section 12.1 Amendments to the Lease Not Requiring Consent of Bondholders ...................45 Section 12.2 Amendments to Lease Requiring Consent of Bondholders ... .............................46 Section12.3 Rights of Authority ................................................................ .............................46 Section 12.4 Notice to Rating Agencies ..................................................... .............................46 ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS ............................................................... .............................46 Section 13.1 Rights in Authority are Held Solely for Benefit of Bondholders .......................46 Section 13.2 Covenants of Authority Bind Successors and Assigns .......... .............................46 Section 13.3 Immunity of Officers ............................................................. .............................47 Section 13.4 No Benefits to Outside Parties ................................................ .............................47 Section 13.5 Separability of Indenture Provisions ...................................... .............................47 Section 13.6 Execution of Indenture in Counterparts .................................. .............................47 Section 13.7 Headings Not Controlling ...................................................... .............................47 Section 13.8 Notices etc., to Trustee, Authority and City ....................:..... .............................47 EXHIBIT A — Description of the Land :.... EXHIBIT B — Draw Request ..................... ................................... ............................... A -1 .................................. ............................... B -1 TRUST INDENTURE (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES) THIS TRUST INDENTURE (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES), dated as of the 1 st day of July, 2014, by and between the EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota (the "Authority ") and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, having its main office and place of business in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority is a body corporate and politic duly created and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and .WHEREAS, as authorized by Sections 469.012, subdivision 1(7) and 469.003, and Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes, the Authority has agreed to issue its revenue bonds to finance a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping additional recreational Facilities of the City consisting of a sports dome, outdoor refrigerated ice rink and improvements to Braemar Arena and Pamela Park (the Facilities, as herein defined) on certain land (the Land, as herein defined) a portion of which is_ made available by the City of Edina (the "City ") pursuant to the Ground Lease, dated as of July 1, 2014, between the City, as lessor, and the Authority, as lessee (the "Ground Lease" ), and to lease the portion of the Facilities subject to the Ground Lease to the City pursuant to and in accordance with a Lease Agreement dated as of July 1, 2014, between the Authority and the City (the "Lease "); and WHEREAS, the Authority has deemed it advisable to enter into this Indenture and has duly authorized and directed the issuance of bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $ to be designated "Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations)" (the "Series 2014 Bonds "), which shall be fully registered bonds as in this Indenture hereinafter provided; and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Series 2014 Bonds, together with any other required funds, will be used for the specific authorized purpose of providing funds to pay Project.Costs (as herein defined); and WHEREAS, the Lease requires the City to make rental payments thereunder in amounts and at times sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, on and interest on the Series 2014 Bonds when due; and WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of this Indenture and the Lease and the issuance of the Series 2014 Bonds have been in all respects duly and validly authorized by the Board. of Commissioners of the Authority pursuant to a bond resolution adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Authority on June 17, 2014 (the "Bond Resolution "); and WHEREAS; all conditions; acts and things necessary and required by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Minnesota, or otherwise; to exist, to have happened or to have been performed precedent to and in the execution and delivery of this Indenture, and in the issuance of the Series 2014 Bonds, do exist, have happened or have been performed in regular form, time and manner, and the execution and delivery of this Indenture have been in all respects duly authorized; and WHEREAS, the Trustee has accepted the trusts created by this Indenture and in evidence thereof has joined in the execution hereof NOW, THEREFORE, THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH: GRANTING CLAUSES That the Authority, in order to secure the payment of the principal of, premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds issued under this Indenture according to their tenor and effect and the performance and.observance of each and all of the covenants and conditions herein and therein contained, and for and in consideration of the premises and of the purchase and acceptance of the Bonds by the respective purchaser or purchasers and Owners or Holders thereof, and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has executed and delivered this Indenture and has granted, bargained, sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed, warranted, pledged and set over, and by these presents does hereby grant, bargain, sell, assign, transfer, convey, warrant, pledge and set over, absolutely unto the Trustee, and to its successor or successors in, the trust hereby created and to its or their assigns forever: I. All of the right, title and interest of the Authority in the Ground Lease and the Lease (except for the Authority's rights to indemnification and reimbursement of expenses). II. A first lien on and pledge of (i) the money and investments in the Bond Fund covenanted to be created and maintained under this Indenture, and (ii) the moneys and investments in the Construction Fund established under this Indenture not paid out to meet Project Costs. III. Any and all other property of every name and nature from time to time hereafter by delivery or by writing of any kind conveyed, mortgaged, assigned or transferred, or in which a security interest is granted, by the Authority or the City or by anyone on behalf of them or with their written consent, to the Trustee, which is hereby authorized to receive any and all such property at any and all times and to hold and apply the same to the terms hereof. -2- TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all and singular the said property hereby conveyed and assigned, or agreed or intended so to be, to the Trustee, its successor or successors in trust and its and their assigns, FOREVER. IN TRUST NEVERTHELESS, upon the terms and trust herein set. forth,; for -the equal and proportionate benefit, security. and protection of all Holders of the Bonds issued or to be issued under and secured by this Indenture, without preference, priority. or distinction as to lien or otherwise of any of the Bonds over any of the others; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that if the Authority, its successors or assigns, shall well,and truly pay or cause to be paid the piincipal.of the Bonds and the premium (if 'any) and interest due or to become due thereon, at the times and in the manner mentioned in the Bonds, according to the true intent and meaning thereof, or shall provide, as permitted hereby, for the payment thereof by depositing With the Trustee sums sufficient to pay the entire amount due or to become due thereon, and shall well and truly keep, perform and observe all the covenants and conditions pursuant to the terms of this Indenture to be kept, performed and observed by it and shall pay to the Trustee all sums of money due or to become due to it in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof; then upon such final payment this Indenture and the rights hereby granted shall cease, determine and be void; otherwise, this Indenture to be and remain in full force and effect. THIS INDENTURE FURTHER WITNESSETH, and it is expressly declared that, all Bonds issued and secured hereunder are to be issued, authenticated and delivered and all said property hereby assigned or pledged is to be dealt with and disposed of under, upon and subject to the terms, conditions, stipulations, covenants, agreements, trusts, uses and purposes as hereinafter expressed, and the Authority has agreed and covenanted and does hereby agree and covenant with the Trustee and with the respective Holders from time to time, of the said Bonds, as follows: -3- ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION Section 1.1 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Article I and in the recitals and succeeding Articles of this Indenture shall, for all purposes of this Indenture and of any indenture supplemental hereto, have the meanings herein specified, such definitions to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of any of the terms defined: Additional Bonds: Any additional Bonds issued pursuant to the terms and conditions of Section 2.10 of this Indenture. Architect: A licensed architect in the State of Minnesota to be selected by the City to prepare Plans and Specifications for the Facilities. Authority Representative: The Chair or Secretary of the Authority or any other person authorized to act on behalf of Authority under or with respect to this Indenture, as evidenced by a certificate conferring such authority executed by the Chair, given to the Trustee and the City. Bond Fund: The Bond Fund created under Section 5.1 of this Indenture. Bond Resolution: The resolutions of the Authority adopted by the Board of . Commissioners of the Authority on June '17, 2014, authorizing the issuance and sale of the Series 2014 Bonds, as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented by any amendments or modifications thereof. Bonds: The Series 2014 Bonds and any Additional Bonds. Business Day: Any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or other day on which commercial banks in the city in which the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee is located are not open for business. Certificate: A certification in writing required or permitted by the provisions of the Lease or this Indenture, signed and delivered to the Trustee or other proper person or persons. Cam: City of Edina, Minnesota, and its permitted successors and assigns under the Lease. City Representative: The City Manager or any person authorized by law to act on behalf of the City under or with respect to the Lease, as evidenced by a certificate conferring such authority executed by the City Manager and given to the Trustee and the Authority. Completion Certificate: A certificate in the form attached as Exhibit C to the Lease executed by the City, stating that the Facilities has been completed in accordance with the Plans and Specifications. -4- Completion Date: With respect to the Facilities, the date upon which the Completion Certificate is issued with respect thereto by the City and delivered to the Authority and the Trustee. Construction Fund: The Construction Fund created under Section 4.2 of this Indenture. Default: Default by the Authority in the performance or observance of any of the covenants, agreements or conditions on its part contained in this Indenture, exclusive of any notice or period of grace required to constitute a default an "Event of Default" as described in Section 7.01 hereof. . Event of Default: An Event of Default described in Section 7.1 hereof which has not been cured. Facilities: The recreational Facilities, including fixtures and furnishings, as more fully described in Exhibit B to the Ground Lease. Fiscal Year: The fiscal year of the Authority; initially, the 12 -month period commencing on January 1 in each year. Ground Lease: The Ground Lease, dated as of July 1, 2014, between the City, as lessor, and the Authority, as lessee, pursuant to which the City will ground lease a portion of the Land to the Authority; and, any duly authorized and executed amendment thereto. Holder, Bondholder or Owner: The person or persons in whose name any Bond shall be registered in the registration books maintained by the Trustee on behalf of the Authority. Indenture: This Trust Indenture under which the Bonds are authorized to be issued, and any amendments or supplements hereto entered into in accordance with the provisions hereof. Independent Counsel: An attorney or firm of attorneys duly admitted to practice law before the highest court of any state and not an officer or full -time employee of the Authority or the City. Interest Payment Date: The stated maturity of an installment of interest on any of the Bonds. Internal Revenue Code: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time Land: The real estate described on Exhibit A hereto, upon which the Facilities are located. Lease: The Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014, between the Authority, as lessor, and the City, as lessee, as the same may be amended pursuant thereto and hereto. -5- Opinion of Counsel: A written opinion of counsel (who need not be Independent Counsel unless so specified) appointed by the City or Authority and acceptable to the Trustee or appointed by the Trustee. Outstandinia: When used as of any particular time with reference to Bonds, means (subject to the provisions of Section 9.3 of this Indenture pertaining to Bonds held by the Authority and the City) all Bonds theretofore authenticated and delivered by the' Trustee under this Indenture except: (i) Bonds theretofore canceled by the Trustee or surrendered to the Trustee for cancellation; (ii) Bonds for the payment or redemption of which funds or direct obligations of or obligations fully guaranteed by the United States of America in the necessary amount shall have theretofore been deposited with the Trustee (whether upon or prior to the maturity or the redemption date of such Bonds); provided that if such Bonds are to be redeemed prior to the maturity thereof, notice of such redemption shall have been given pursuant to Article III of this Indenture, or provision satisfactory to the Trustee shall have been made for the giving of such notice; and (iii) Bonds in lieu of or in substitution for which other Bonds shall have been authenticated and delivered by the Trustee pursuant to the terms of Section 2.08 hereof pertaining to replacement of Bonds. Plans and Specifications: Architectural and engineering drawings and specifications prepared by the Architect describing the Facilities and any changes thereto approved by the ,City. Predecessor Bonds: Every previous Bond evidencing all or a portion of the same debt as that evidenced by a particular Bond, including Bonds exchanged pursuant to Section 2.05 hereof, and for purposes of this definition, any Bond authenticated and delivered under Section 2.08 hereof in' lieu of a lost, destroyed or stolen Bond shall be deemed to evidence the same debt as the lost, destroyed or stolen Bond. Principal PajMent Date: The stated maturity of principal of any. Bond. Protect Costs: The costs defined in Section 4.3 of this Indenture. Purchase Price: The amount necessary to defease to the earliest permissible redemption date the remaining Outstanding principal amount of Bonds, together with an amount equal to the Authority's and Trustee's fees and expenses in connection with such defeasance and redemption. Qualified Investments: Any security or investment in which public funds of the Authority may be invested in under Minnesota Statutes, Section 118A.04 or other applicable Minnesota law. Redeem or Redemption:.Includes and means "prepay" or "prepayment," as the case may be. Rental Pa ment: Any payment due from the City to the Authority under Section 5.1 of the Lease. IRI Responsible Officer: As to any Trustee, the chair of the Board of Commissioners, the president, every vice president, every assistant vice president, the cashier, every assistant cashier, every corporate trust officer, and every officer and assistant officer of such Trustee, other than those specifically above mentioned, to whom any corporate trust matter is referred because of such person's knowledge of, and-familiarity with, a particular subject. Series 2014 Bonds: The Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations), authorized by this Indenture and the Bond Resolution and described in Section 2.01 of this Indenture. Trust Estate: The interest of the Authority in the Lease assigned under Granting Clause I of this Indenture; the revenues, moneys, investments, contract rights, general intangibles and instruments and proceeds and products and accessions thereof as set forth in Granting Clause II of this Indenture; and additional property held by the Trustee pursuant to Granting Clause III of this Indenture. Trustee: The trustee at the time serving as such under this Indenture. Section 1.2 Additional Provisions as to Interpretation. All references herein to "Articles ", "Sections" and`other subdivisions are to the corresponding Articles, Sections or subdivisions of this Indenture; and the words "herein ", "hereof', "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Indenture as a whole and not to any_particular Article, Section or subdivision hereof. Any terms defined in -the Lease, but not defined herein, shall have the same meaning herein unless the context hereof clearly requires otherwise. This Indenture is governed by and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Minnesota. ARTICLE II FORM, EXECUTION AND REGISTRATION OF BONDS Section 2.1 Form, of Series 2014 Bonds. (a) The Series 2.014 Bonds to be issued and secured under this Indenture'shall .each be designated "Public Project Revenue Bond, Series 2014 (City of Edina Annual Appropriation Lease Obligations)." The Series 2014 Bonds, forms of assignment and certificates of Trustee shall be substantially in the following form: -7- (Form of Series 2014 Bond) No. R. $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BOND, SERIES 2014 (CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS) Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue CUSIP July 15, 2014 REGISTERED OWNER: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota (the "Authority "), for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, solely from the sources hereinafter identified, the principal amount set forth above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay to the registered owner hereof interest on such principal amount from such sources at the interest rate specified above from the date of original issue specified above or from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, as specified below, on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2015, until said principal amount is paid. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a three hundred sixty (360) day year composed of twelve (12) thirty (30) day months and shall be payable to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a Business Day) of the month preceding such Interest Payment Date at such person's address set forth on the registration books maintained by the Trustee hereinafter designated. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender at the principal office of the agent of the Trustee described below, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of American by check or draft drawn on U.S. Bank National Association, of St. Paul, Minnesota as trustee designated under the Trust Indenture referred, to below (the "Trustee "). Any such interest not punctually paid or provided for will cease to be payable to the registered owner as of a regular record date and such defaulted interest may be paid to the person in whose name this Bond shall be registered at the close of business on a special record date for the payment of such defaulted interest established by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond, is registered in the name of Cede & Co; as, nominee of The Depository Trust Company; or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Trustee shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with: respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee'in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the Authority. This Bond is issued under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 and Chapter 475, as amended, and in conformity with the provisions, restrictions and limitations thereof. This Bond does not constitute an indebtedness. of the Authority, the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), the County of Hennepin (the County), the State of Minnesota (the "State ") or any other political subdivision within the meaning of any state constitutional - provision or statutory limitation, nor does.this Bond give rise to a charge against%the general credit or properties or taxing powers of the Authority,'the. City, the County, the State or other political subdivision and does not grant to the registered owner of this Bond any right to have the Authority, the City, the County, the State or other political subdivision levy any taxes or appropriate any funds for the payment of the principal hereof or interest hereon, nor is this Bond a general obligation of the Authority, the City, the County, the State or other political subdivision or the individual officers or agents thereof. This Bond and interest hereon are payable solely and only from the moneys received under the Lease (as hereinafter defined), or held by the Trustee in a Fund appropriated to the payment of the Bonds of this series under the Indenture (as hereinafter defined), including Rental Payments to be made by the City under such Lease. This Bond is one of a duly authorized series of special obligation Bonds of,an aggregate, principal `amount of $ (the "Series 2014 Bonds "), all of which have been authorized by law to be issued and have been issued or are to be issued for the purpose of financing the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping additional recreational Facilities of the City (the "Facilities ") which are to be leased to the City by the Authority pursuant to a Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Lease "), between the Authority, as lessor, and the City, as lessee. The Series 2014 Bonds are issued pursuant to a Bond Resolution of the Authority duly adopted June 17, 2014, and a Trust Indenture (Recreational Facilities), dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Indenture "), duly executed and delivered by the Authority to the Trustee. The Series 2014 Bonds are equally and ratably secured by the Lease, the Indenture and the Bond Resolution, to which Lease, Indenture and Bond Resolution and amendments thereof reference is hereby made for a description and limitation of the revenues pledged to secure the payment of the Series 2014 Bonds, the nature and extent of the security thereby created, the rights of the registered owners of the Series 2014 Bonds, the rights, duties and immunities of the Trustee, and the rights, immunities and obligations of the Authority thereunder. The obligation of the City under the Lease to make Rental Payments sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Series 2014 Bonds when due is a limited obligation of-the City, subject to the annual appropriation in each fiscal year by the City Board of funds sufficient to pay such Rental Payments. The City is not obligated to make any such appropriation and has the right to cancel and terminate the Lease at the end of any fiscal year of the City if the City Council does not appropriate moneys sufficient to pay the Rental Payments coming due in the next In fiscal year. Certified copies of the Bond Resolution and executed counterparts of the Indenture and Lease are on file at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee. The Series 2014 Bonds are subject to optional redemption in whole or in part, and Series 2014 Bonds maturing on February 1, 20_ are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption as provided in Section 3.1 of the Indenture, and if in part, in such order of maturity dates as the Authority may determine and by lot or other manner deemed fair as to Bonds maturing on the same date, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the redemption date. Notice of any such redemption shall be published if, and to the extent, then required by law, and shall also be given to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed by first -class mail, addressed to such owner at the owner's registered address, not later than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption. On or prior to the date fixed for redemption, funds are required to be deposited with the Trustee sufficient to pay the Bonds called and accrued interest thereon. Upon the happening of the above conditions, Bonds thus called shall not bear interest after the redemption date and, except for the purpose of payment from the funds so deposited, shall no longer be protected by the Indenture. This Bond is transferable, as provided in the Indenture, only upon books of the Authority kept at the principal office of the agent of the Trustee by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Bond for transfer at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, duly endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Trustee duly executed by the registered owner hereof ,or the owner's duly authorized attorney, and, upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental . charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, one or more fully registered Bonds of this series of the same principal amount and interest rate will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees. The Series 2014 Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds without coupons in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. As provided in the Indenture and subject to certain limitations therein set forth, the Bonds of this series are exchangeable for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of this series of a different authorized denomination, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's duly authorized attorney upon surrender thereof to the Trustee at its principal corporate trust office. IT IS- HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required to be done precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond and the series of which it is a part have been properly done, have happened and have been performed in regular and due time, form and mariner as required by law. This Bond shall not be valid nor become obligatory for any purpose under the Indenture until it shall have been authenticated by the execution of the Certificate hereon endorsed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Trustee. -10- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Minnesota, by its Board of Commissioners, has caused this Bond to be executed in its name by the facsimile signatures of its Chair and Secretary. -11- EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Chair Secretary CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Indenture. Date: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations. TEN COM -- as tenants in common UTMA .........:......... as Custodian for ................ (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ...... TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties (State) JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be.used. J -12- ASSIGNMENT For value, received; the undersigned hereby sells, assigns, and transfers unto the within Certificate and all rights thereunder, and does hereby-irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Certificate on the books kept for registration of the within Certificate, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: NOTICE: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature Guaranteed: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in STAMP or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Section 2.2 Maturities Numeration and Interest Payment Dates. The Series 2014 Bonds shall be in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, initially numbered R -1 upwards in order of issuance or in such other manner as the Trustee may determine, and shall bear a date of original issue as of July 15, 2014. No Series 2014 Bond shall represent principal payable or maturing in different years. The Series 2014 Bonds shall bear interest payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2015, from their date of original issue or the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for. The principal and redemption price of the Series 2014 Bonds shall be payable to the Owner upon presentation and surrender at the principal office of the Trustee in such coin or currency. of the United States of America as may be, on the respective dates of payment thereof, legal tender for the payment of public and private debts, and interest on Series 2014 Bonds shall be paid by check or draft mailed to the Owner at the Owner's registered address. The Regular Record Date referred toxin Section 2:5 for the payment of interest on the Series 2014 Bonds payable, and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any Interest Payment Date shall be the 15th day (whether or not a Business Day) of -the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. The Series 2014 Bonds shall' be in the aggregate principal amount of Million Hundred Thousand Dollars ($ ), and, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts and shall bear interest at the rates per annum, according to years of maturity, as follows: -13- Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2023 2034 2035 Section 2.3 Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be signed in the name of the Authority by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Chair and Secretary of the Authority and said signatures shall be authenticated by the Trustee, which is hereby designated as authenticating agent. The seal Hof the-Authority, if any, need not be affixed to or imprinted on the Bonds. In the event that any of the officers who shall have signed any of the Bonds shall cease to be officers of the Authority before the Bonds shall have been authenticated or delivered by the Trustee, or issued by the Authority, such Bonds may, nevertheless, be authenticated, delivered, and issued, and upon such authentication, delivery and issue, shall be binding upon the Authority as though those officers who signed the same had continued to be such officers of the Authority; and, also, any Bond may be signed on behalf of the Authority by such person who, at the actual date of execution of such Bond, shall be the proper officer of the Authority, although at the date of such Bond such person shall not have been such an officer of the Authority. Upon the execution and delivery of this Indenture, the Authority shall execute and deliver the Series 2014 Bonds to the Trustee for authentication. Section 2.4 Authentication of Bonds. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or shall be entitled to any right or benefit hereunder or under the Lease, unless an authorized signatory of the Trustee shall manually endorse and execute on such Bond a certificate of authentication substantially in the form of the Trustee's certificate "set forth in the recitals hereof. Such Trustee's certificate upon any Bond executed on behalf of the Authority shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly issued under this Indenture and that the Holder thereof is entitled to the benefits of this Indenture and the Lease. No Bonds shall be authenticated by the Trustee except in accordance with this Article. The Trustee shall not be required to authenticate any Bond or Bonds unless provided with the documents referred to in Section 2.9 hereof. Section 2.5 Registration, Transfer and Exchange. As long as any of the Bonds issued hereunder shall remain outstanding, the Authority shall maintain and keep at the office of the Trustee as paying agent, records for the payment of the principal of and interest on such Bonds, -14- as in this Indenture provided, and for the registration and transfer of such Bonds,. and shall also keep at said office of the Trustee books for such registration and transfer. The Authority does hereby appoint the Trustee, and its successors in the trust from time to time, as its agent to maintain said office and agency at the office of the Trustee. Upon surrender for transfer of any fully registered Bond at the office of the Trustee with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Trustee, duly executed by the Owner or the Owner's duly authorized attorney, and upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, the Authority shall execute and the Trustee shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more fully registered Bonds of the same series, of any authorized denominations and of a like aggregate principal amount, interest rate and maturity. Except as the right of exchange may be limited as to Bonds of any series, fully registered Bonds, upon surrender thereof at the office of the Trustee, may, at the option of the Owner thereof, be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of fully registered Bonds of the same series, maturity and interest rate of any authorized denominations. In all cases in which the privilege of exchanging Bonds or transferring fully registered Bonds is exercised, the Authority shall execute.and the Trustee shall deliver Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Indenture. For every such exchange or transfer of Bonds, whether temporary or definitive, the Authority or the Trustee may make a charge sufficient to reimburse it for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or transfer, which sum or sums shall be paid by the person requesting such exchange or transfer as a condition precedent to the exercise of the privilege of making such exchange or transfer. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture, the cost of preparing each new Bond upon each exchange or transfer, and any other expenses of the Authority or the Trustee incurred in connection therewith (except any applicable tax, fee or other governmental charge) shall be paid by the City pursuant to the Lease. The Authority and the Trustee shall not be obligated to make any such exchange or transfer of Bonds during the 15 days next preceding the date of the first publication or the mailing (if there is no publication) of notice of redemption in the case of a proposed redemption of Bonds. The Authority and Trustee shall not be required to make any transfer or exchange of any Bonds called for redemption. Section 2.6 Payment of Interest on Series 2014 Bonds: Interest Rights Preserved. Interest on any Bond which is payable, and is punctually paid or duly provided for on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name that Bond (or one or more Predecessor Bonds) is registered at the close of business on the Regular Record Date for such interest specified in the provisions of this Indenture creating such series. Any interest on any Bond which is payable, but is not punctually paid or duly provided for, on any Interest Payment Date (herein called "Defaulted Interest ") shall forthwith cease to be payable to-the Holder on the relevant Regular Record Date solely by virtue of such Holder having been such Holder; and such Defaulted Interest may be paid by the Authority as provided in Subsection A or B below: -15- A. The Authority may elect to make payment of any Defaulted Interest on the fully registered Bonds of any series to the persons in whose names such Bonds (or their respective Predecessor Bonds) are registered at the close of business on a Special Record Date for the payment of such Defaulted Interest, which shall be fixed in the following manner. The Authority shall notify the Trustee in writing of the amount of Defaulted Interest proposed to be paid on each Bond and the date of the proposed payment (which date shall be such as will enable the Trustee to comply with the next sentence hereof), and at the same time the Authority shall deposit with the Trustee an amount of money equal to the aggregate amount proposed to be paid in respect of such Defaulted Interest or shall make arrangements satisfactory to the Trustee for such deposit prior to the date of the proposed payment, such money when deposited to be held in trust for the benefit of the persons entitled to such Defaulted Interest as in this Subsection provided and not to be deemed part of the Trust Estate. Thereupon the Trustee shall fix a Special Record Date for the payment of such Defaulted Interest which shall be not more than 15 nor less than 10 days prior to the date of the proposed payment and not less than 10 days after the receipt by the Trustee of the notice of the proposed payment. The Trustee shall promptly notify the Authority of such Special Record Date and, in the name of the Authority and at the expense of the City, shall cause notice of the proposed payment of such Defaulted Interest and the Special Record Date therefor to be mailed, first class postage prepaid, to each Holder of a fully registered Bond of such series at his address as it appears in the registration books not less than 10 days prior to such Special Record Date. Notice of the proposed payment of such Defaulted Interest and the Special Record Date therefor having been mailed as aforesaid, such Defaulted Interest shall be paid to the Persons in whose names the Bonds of such series (or their respective Predecessor Bonds) are registered on such Special Record Date and shall no longer be payable pursuant to the following Subsection B. B. The Authority may make payment of any Defaulted Interest on the Bonds of any series in any other lawful manner, if, after notice given by the Authority to the Trustee of the proposed payment pursuant to this Subsection, such payment shall be deemed practicable by the Trustee. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this Section, each Bond delivered under this Indenture upon transfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried,, by such other Bond and each such Bond shall bear interest from such date that neither gain nor loss in interest shall result from such transfer, exchange or substitution. Section 2.7 Ownership of Bonds. The Authority and the Trustee and their respective successors, each in its discretion, may deem and treat the person in whose name any Bond shall for the time being be registered as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and neither the Authority nor the Trustee nor their respective successors shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Payment of or on account of the principal of and interest on any such Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of the Owner thereof, but such registration may be changed as -16- above provided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. Section 2.8 Reissuance.of Mutilated Destroyed Stolen or Lost Bonds. In case any. outstan e ding Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Trustee shall authenticate and deliver a new Bond of like tenor, number and amount as the Bond so mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost, in exchange and substitution for such mutilated Bond, upon surrender an of such mutilated Bond, or in lieu of d substitution for the Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Trustee evidence satisfactory to the Authority and the Trustee that such Bond has been destroyed,. stolen or lost and proof of ownership thereof, and upon furnishing the Authority, the Trustee and the City with indemnity satisfactory to them and complying with such other reasonable regulations as the Trustee may prescribe and paying such reasonable expenses as the Authority, the Trustee and the City may incur in connection therewith. In the event any such Bond shall have matured, instead of issuing a new Bond, the Authority may pay the same without surrender thereof. Section 2.9 Conditions for Authentication of Series 2014 Bonds. The Trustee shall not authenticate and deliver the Series 2014 Bonds to be issued and delivered pursuant to the Indenture unless theretofore or simultaneously therewith there shall have been delivered to the Trustee the following: (a) a certified copy of the Bond Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Series 2014 Bonds and the execution and delivery of the Ground Lease, the Lease and this Indenture; (b) a certified copy of the resolution adopted by the governing body of the City approving the issuance of the Series 2014 Bonds and the terms of the Indenture and authorizing the execution and delivery of the Ground Lease and Lease by the City; (c) executed counterparts of the Ground Lease, the Lease and the Indenture; (d) the manually signed approving opinion of Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as Bond Counsel for the Authority, concerning the validity and legality of the Series 2014 Bonds; and (e) such further certifications, documents and Opinions of Counsel as Bond. Counsel may require. Section 2.10 Authorization of Additional Bonds. In addition to the Series 2014 Bonds above described, the Authority.inay. in its discretion, upon request of the City, issue Additional Bonds to (1) provide funds to complete the Facilities, (ii) provide funds for additions to or further improvements of the Facilities, and (iii) subject to Section 6.2 hereof and applicable law, refund or advance refund any Bonds then Outstanding and, in case of an advance refunding, the interest thereon to maturity or a specified redemption date. Any such Additional Bonds shall be authorized by resolution of the Authority and described in a supplemental indenture executed by the Authority and the Trustee and which, when so issued, authorized and described, shall be -17- secured by this Indenture and the Trust Estate on a parity with the Bonds then Outstanding under this Indenture; provided, that no such Additional Bonds shall be issued under the Indenture or secured by the Trust Estate on a parity with the Outstanding Bonds unless the following conditions are met: (a) There shall have been furnished to the Trustee a Certificate of an Authority Representative and a Certificate of a City Representative to the effect that the Lease is in effect and no "event of default" (as such term is defined in the Lease) exists thereunder which shall not be cured upon the issuance of the Additional Bonds; and (b) There shall have been furnished to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel to the effect that the issuance of the Additional Bonds will not adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on any Outstanding Bonds; and (c) There shall have been furnished to the Trustee a supplement to the Lease providing for additional Rental Payments sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Additional Bonds when due; and (d) There shall have been furnished to the Trustee a Certificate of an Authority Representative to the effect that the proceeds of the Additional Bonds, together with any additional funds supplied or to be supplied by the Authority or City will be sufficient to complete the Facilities, the cost of the improvement to the Facilities or the cost of the refunding, as the case may be; and (e) If the Additional Bonds are issued for an advance refunding described in clause (iii) above, a report of an independent accountant to the effect that (A) the proceeds (excluding accrued interest but including any premium) of the Additional Bonds, plus any moneys to be withdrawn from the Bond Fund for such purpose and any other funds deposited with the Trustee for such purpose, will be not less than an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and the redemption premium, if any, on the Outstanding Bonds to be refunded and interest which will become due and payable on or prior to maturity or an earlier redemption date, or that (B) from such proceeds or other sources there shall be deposited in trust with the Trustee government securities of the type specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subdivision 8, the principal of and the interest on which when due and payable will provide, together with any other moneys which shall have been deposited with the Trustee for such purpose, sufficient moneys to pay such principal, redemption premium and interest; and (f) If the Additional Bonds are. issued for the purpose described in clause (iii) above, and do not defease all Outstanding Bonds, a report of an independent accountant to the effect that the debt service payable on Outstanding Bonds (including the Additional Bonds to be issued) in each future calendar year during which Bonds remain Outstanding will not be increased over the amount which would have been payable in such calendar years had the Additional Bonds not been issued. -18- The Trustee shall not authenticate any such Additional Bonds until there is also delivered to the Trustee a resolution of the Authority authorizing the Additional Bonds, executed counterparts of amendments to the Lease providing for the additional Rental Payments, a supplement to the Indenture describing the Additional Bonds and further documents of the kind described in Section 2.9 to the. extent applicable to the Additional Bonds. Additional Bonds shall have Interest Payment Dates of February 1 and August 1, and Principal Payment Dates of May 1. Section 2.11 Book -Entry Only System. For purposes of this Section and Section 2.12, the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Beneficial Owner" shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such person's subrogee. "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York, New York. "DTC Participant" shall mean any broker - dealer, bank or other financial institution for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository. "Representation Letter" shall mean the Representation Letter pursuant to which the Authority agrees. to; comply with DTC's Operational Arrangements. Upon the initial issuance of the Bonds, DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. The Bonds shall be initially issued in the form of a single Bond for each stated maturity, registered in the Bond Register in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC. Until termination of the book -entry only system pursuant to Section 2.12 hereof, the Bonds may only be registered in the name of Cede & Co. With respect to the Bonds registered in the Bond Register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, neithenthe Authority nor the Trustee shall have any responsibility or obligation to any DTC. Participant or to any Beneficial Owner. Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, neither the Authority nor the Trustee shall have any responsibility or obligation with respect to ,(i). the. accuracy of the records of DTC or any DTC Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any.other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount of principal of, premium, if any, or interest with respect to the Bonds. The Authority and the Trustee may treat as and deem DTC to be the absolute owner of each Bond for the purpose of payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of giving notices of redemption and other matters with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bond, and for all other purposes whatsoever. The Trustee shall pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest with respect to the Bonds only to or upon the order of the Bondholders as shown on the -19- Bond Register, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the Authority's and Trustee's obligations with respect to the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest relating to the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums -so paid. Upon delivery by DTC to the Trustee of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., and subject to the transfer provisions.in Section 2.05 hereof, references to "Cede & Co." in this Section shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. Section 2.12 Substitute Securities Depository; Termination of Book -Entry Only System. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving written notice to the Authority and the Trustee and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. The Authority may terminate the services of DTC with respect to the Bonds at any time if it determines that DTC. is no longer able to carry out its functions as securities depository or that continuation of the system of book -entry transfers through DTC is not in the best interests of the Authority or the Beneficial Owners. Upon the termination of the services of DTC, a substitute securities depository may be appointed by the Authority. Any substitute securities depository appointed hereunder shall undertake all the obligations and duties of DTC described in this Indenture. In any such case the references herein to DTC shall be deemed to mean such substitute securities depository and any references herein to Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, shall be deemed to mean the nominee of such substitute securities depository. Upon the termination of the services of DTC, and if no substitute securities depository willing to undertake the functions of DTC hereunder can be found that, in the opinion of the Authority, is able to undertake such functions upon reasonable and customary terms, or if the Authority determines that it is in the best interests of the Authority or the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds that the Beneficial Owners be able to obtain certificated Bonds, the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the Bond Register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, but may be registered in whatever name or names the Bondholders shall designate at that time, in accordance with this Article. To the extent that the Beneficial Owners are designated as the transferee by DTC, the Bonds will be delivered to the Beneficial Owners. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest relating to such Bond, and all notices with respect to such Bond, shall be made and given to DTC as provided in the Representation Letter. ARTICLE III REDEMPTION OF BONDS Section 3.1 Redemption of Series 2014 Bonds. The Series 2014 Bonds maturing in 2025 and later years are subject to redemption at the option of the Authority, in whole or in part in integral multiples of $5,000, and if in part, in such order of maturity dates as the Authority may W111 determine and by lot or other manner deemed fair as to Series 2014 Bonds maturing on the same date, on any Business Day on or after February 1, 2024, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date. The Series 2014 with stated maturities in the year 20 ..are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption, at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof plus_ interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the following years the following stated principal amounts of such Bonds: 20 $ 20_ (maturity) Section 3.2 Notice of Redemption. If the Bonds are to be redeemed pursuant to Section 3.1 hereof, and written'notice of an election to exercise an option to redeem Bonds hereunder shall have been given to the Trustee at least 45 days.prior by the,Authority,.the Trustee shall prepare a notice in the name of the Authority or in its own name describing the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed, the date of redemption, and the redemption price. Notice of redemption shall be mailed by the Trustee, not less than thirty. (30) days before the redemption date, by first - class mail, to the Owners of all Bonds which are to be redeemed, at their last addresses appearing upon the registry books of the Authority and shall be published to the extent required by law. Section 3.3 Deposit for Redemption. Prior to the designated redemption date the Authority shall deposit or cause to be deposited with the Trustee funds sufficient to pay the redemption price of the Bonds to be redeemed, and interest thereon to the redemption date, and there shall be deposited, or arrangements shall be made with the Trustee to deposit, with the Trustee a sum sufficient to pay the proper expenses and charges of the Trustee in connection with such redemption. Upon deposit with the Trustee of the aggregate amount of such redemption price and interest pursuant to this Section, such moneys shall be set aside by the Trustee and held by it for the account of the respective Holders of the Bonds being redeemed. Section 3.4 Payment of Redeemed Bonds. After notice of redemption shall have been given as provided in Section 3.2, the Bonds specified in such notice shall become due and payable on the redemption date. Payment of the redemption price and interest shall be made to or upon order of the Owner, upon the surrender of the Bonds. Any installment of interest maturing on or prior to the redemption date shall be payable to the Owners of Bonds registered as such on the relevant Record Dates according to the terms of such Bonds and the provisions of Section 2.06 hereof and the notice of redemption herein provided for may so state. If redemption moneys are available for the payment of all of the Bonds called for redemption on the redemption date, the Bonds so called shall cease to draw interest after the redemption date, and such Bonds shall not be deemed to be outstanding hereunder for any purpose, except that the Holders thereof, on presentation, as herein provided, shall be entitled to receive payment of the -21- redemption price and interest accrued thereon to the redemption date from the moneys set aside by the Trustee as aforesaid. Section 3.5 Cancellation of Redeemed Bonds. All Bonds so redeemed, shall forthwith be canceled and destroyed by the Trustee and a certificate of destruction furnished to the Authority; and no further Bonds shall be executed or authenticated or issued hereunder in exchange or substitution therefor. Section 3.6 Partial Redemption of Bonds. If less than all of the Bonds of a particular maturity at the time outstanding are to be called for prior redemption, the particular Bonds or portions thereof of such maturity to be redeemed shall be selected by lot, except as otherwise provided herein, by the Trustee in such manner as the Trustee, in its discretion, may determine. The Trustee shall call for redemption in accordance with the foregoing provisions as many Bonds or portions thereof as will, as nearly as practicable, exhaust the moneys available therefor. Particular Bonds or portions thereof shall be redeemed only in integral multiples of principal amount of $5,000. In the case of Bonds of denominations greater than $5,000, if less than all of such Bonds then outstanding are to be called for redemption, then for all purposes in connection with. redemption, each $5,000 of principal amount shall be treated as though it was a separate Bond of the denomination of $5,000 bearing one of the numbers borne by such fully registered Bond. If it is determined that one or more, but not all of the $5,000 units of principal amount represented by any. such fully registered Bond is to be called for redemption, then upon notice of intention to redeem such $5,000 unit or units, the owner of such fully registered Bond which forthwith surrender such Bond to the Trustee (1) for payment of the redemption price (including the redemption premium, if any, and interest to date fixed for redemption) of the $5,000 unit.or units of principal amount called for redemption and (2) exchange for a new Bond or Bonds of the aggregate principal amount of the unredeemed balance of the principal amount of such fully registered Bond, which shall be issued to the Owner thereof, without charge therefor. If the owner of any such fully registered Bond of a denomination greater than $5,000 shall fail to present such Bond to the Trustee for payment and exchange as aforesaid, such Bond shall nevertheless become due and payable on the date fixed for redemption to the "extent of the $5,000 unit or units of principal amount called for redemption (and to that extent only). Interest shall cease to accrue on the portion of the principal amount of such Bond represented by such $5,000 unit or units of principal amount on and after the date fixed for redemption, provided that funds sufficient for the payment of the redemption price shall have been deposited with the Trustee and shall be available for the redemption of said $5,000 unit or units on the date fixed for redemption, and in such event, such Bond shall not be entitled to the benefit or security of this Indenture or the Lease to the extent of the portion of its principal amount (and accrued interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption and applicable premium, if any) represented by such $5,000 unit or units of principal amount, nor shall new Bonds be thereafter issued corresponding to said unit or units. -22- ARTICLE IV BOND PROCEEDS; CONSTRUCTION FUND Section 4.1 Deposit of Series 2014 Bond Proceeds. The Authority shall deposit, or shall direct the. purchaser or purchasers of the Series 2014 Bonds to deposit, with the Trustee all of the net proceeds of the sale of the Series 2014 Bonds (including accrued interest thereon from the date from which interest is to be paid thereon to the date of delivery to the purchaser or purchasers thereof) and the Trustee shall deposit to the credit .of the Construction Fund $ of the net proceeds of the Series 2014_ Bonds, and shall deposit $ of the net proceeds of the Series 2014 Bonds to the Bond Fund. Section 4.2 Establishment of Construction Fund. The Authority hereby establishes an account with the Trustee entitled the "Public Project Revenue Bond, Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund) and there.shall be deposited with the Trustee to the credit of the Construction Fund the amount specified in Section 4.1 above from the proceeds of the Series 2014 Bonds. As provided in Section 4.5 hereof, income and profit from the investment of moneys in the Construction Fund shall be credited to the Construction Fund. The Authority has no obligation hereunder to deposit any moneys'in said'Construction Fund or apply moneys to Project Costs except proceeds of Series 2014 Bonds or funds made available therefor by the City. The moneys in'the Construction Fund shall be held in trust by the Trustee and applied to the payment of the Project Costs in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this Article IV, and pending such application shall be subject to a lien and charge in favor of the Holders of the Bonds issued and Outstanding under this Indenture and shall be held for the further security of such Holders until paid out as herein provided. In the event the moneys in the Bond Fund shall be insufficient on any Interest Payment Date to pay principal of, premium (if any) or interest on the Bonds due on such date, the Trustee shall use any moneys then on deposit to the credit of the Construction Fund, to the extent needed, to pay such principal, premium and interest. In no event shall moneys in the Construction Fund be paid for Project Costs if an Event of Default has occurred under the Lease. Section 4.3 Project Costs Defined. For the purposes of this Article, the Project Costs shall include, without intending thereby to limit or restrict any proper definition of such cost under any applicable laws or sound accounting practice, the following: (a) Obligations incurred for labor and to contractors, builders and materialmen in connection with the design, acquisition, installation, construction, remodeling and renovation of the Facilities, including obligations for machinery, materials and equipment therefor; (b) Costs of equipment and furnishings installed in the Facilities; (c) The cost of any indemnity and surety bonds obtained in connection with the Facilities, the fees and expenses of the Trustee during construction, taxes and other municipal governmental charges levied or assessed during construction upon the -23- Facilities or any property acquired therefor, and the premiums for insurance, if any, in connection with the Facilities during construction; (d) Fees and expenses of engineers and architects for surveys and estimates and other preliminary investigations, preparation of plans, drawings and specifications, and supervising acquisition, installation and construction, as well as for the, performance of all other duties of engineers and architects, as are specifically required in relation to the acquisition, installation and construction of the Facilities or the issuance of Bonds therefor, including the cost of such services as may have been performed by employees of the City; and (e) Expenses of administration, supervision and inspection properly chargeable to the Facilities, administrative fees of the Authority and the City, legal expenses and fees, financing charges, cost of audits and of preparing, offering and issuing the Bonds, and initial fees of the Trustee, incident to the acquisition, installation, construction and financing of the Facilities. Section 4.4 Payments from Construction Fund. Payments shall be made. from the Construction Fund by the Trustee upon receipt of a draw request from a City Representative substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B that sets forth the following: (1) the requisition number, (2) the name and address of the person, firm or corporation to whom payment is due or has been made, (3) the amount to be paid, (4) -the purpose to which such payment is to be applied, and (5) that each obligation, item of cost or expense mentioned therein has been properly, incurred, is an item of Project Cost and is a proper charge against the Construction Fund and has not been the basis of any previous withdrawal. Such requisitions may be submitted by facsimile or other electronic means and shall be submitted no more often than twice a month, and the Trustee shall issue its check for each payment required by each such requisition within three Business Days after receipt of said statement. All payments made from the Construction Fund shall be presumed by the Trustee to be made for the purposes certified in said statement, and the Trustee shall not be required to see to the application of any payments made from the Construction Fund or to inquire into the purposes for which withdrawals are being made from the Construction Fund. The Trustee shall not be bound to make an investigation into the facts or matters stated in any Draw Request of the City. The Trustee shall not be responsible for determining whether the funds on hand in the 'Construction Fund are sufficient to complete the Project. The Trustee shall not be responsible to collect lien waivers. None of the funds in the Construction Fund shall be used for any purposes other than the payment or reimbursement of Project Costs and the payment of principal of, premium (if any) on and interest on the Bonds. Section 4.5 Deposit and Investment of Construction Fund Moneys. The Trustee shall invest the moneys on deposit in the Construction Fund at the written request and direction of the City Representative in Qualified Investments. The Trustee may, from,time to time, cause any such investments to be sold or otherwise be converted into cash, whereupon the proceeds derived from such sale or conversion shall be deposited into the Construction Fund. Any interest or -24- profit derived from investments .shall be credited to the Construction Fund. Investments permitted under this Section may be purchased, from the Trustee or from any of its affiliates. No portion of the Construction Fund representing proceeds of the Bonds shall be invested or used in such. 'manner that any of the Bonds would be "arbitrage bonds ". under the Internal Revenue Code and regulations' thereunder. In the absence of written direction delivered to the Trustee from the City, the Trustee shall invest any funds in Qualified Investments. Section 4.6 Application of Balance in Construction Fund. When the Completion Certificate pursuant to the Lease shall have been furnished to the Trustee, any balance in the Construction Fund. (after disbursing any final amount in accordance with a statement from a City Representative) shall be deposited in the Bond Fund. ARTICLE V DISPOSITION OF PLEDGED REVENUES Section 5.1 Bond Fund. The Authority hereby establishes and shall maintain, so long as any of the 'Bonds are outstanding, with the Trustee a separate account to be designated "Public Project Revenue Bond Sinking Fund" (the Bond Fund) into which the Authority and Trustee shall make the following deposits: (a) $ . of the net proceeds of the Series 2014 Bonds to be deposited therein as provided in Section 4.1 hereof, and all Rental Payments by the City pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Lease. (b) . All other moneys received by the Trustee from the City or Authority when accompanied by directions of the City or Authority that such moneys are to be paid into the Bond Fund or used, for purposes for which moneys in the Bond Fund may be used. If the City or Authority so directs, such monies shall be credited against Rental Payments due or to become due. (c) All other moneys required to be deposited in the Bond Fund pursuant to any provision of this .Indenture or the Lease. The moneys and investments in the Bond Fund are irrevocably pledged to and shall be used by the Trustee, from time to time, to the extent required, for the payment of principal of, premium (if any) on and interest on the Bonds, as and when such principal, premium and interest shall "become due and payable. Section 5.2 Investment of Funds in Bond Fund. Any moneys held as a part of the Bond Fund shall be invested or reinvested by the Trustee upon the request and direction of a City Representative in any Qualified Investment. Subject to the foregoing, the type, amount and maturity of Qualified Investments shall conform to the instructions, if any, in the written request. of the City Representative; provided that investments acquired with moneys held in the Bond Fund shall mature no later than the Interest Payment Date upon which such moneys will be needed to pay principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. Investments permitted under this Section may be purchased from the Trustee or from any of its affiliates. Obligations -25- so purchased shall be deemed at all times to be a part of the Bond Fund, unless otherwise provided herein, but may from time-to time be sold or otherwise converted into, cash, whereupon the proceeds derived, from such sale or conversion'shall be credited to the Bond Fund. Any interest accruing on and any profit realized from such investment shall be credited to the Bond Fund. The Trustee shall redeem or sell, at the best. price obtainable, any obligations so purchased, whenever it shall be necessary to do so in order to provide moneys to meet any payment from the Bond Fund. Neither the Trustee nor the Authority shall be liable for any loss resulting from any such investment, nor from failure to preserve rights, against endorsers or other prior parties to instruments evidencing any such investment. Investment of funds pursuant to this Section shall be limited as to amount and yield of investment in such manner that no part of the outstanding Bonds shall be deemed "arbitrage bonds" under the Internal Revenue Code and regulations thereunder. In the absence of written direction delivered to the Trustee from the City, the Trustee shall invest any funds in'Qualified Investments. ARTICLE VI PARTICULAR COVENANTS OF THE AUTHORITY The Authority covenants and agrees, so long as the Bonds shall be outstanding and subject to the limitations on its obligations herein set forth, that: Section 6.1 Payment of Bonds. It will faithfully perform at all times any and all covenants, undertakings, stipulations and provisions contained in this Indenture and the Bond Resolution and in each and every Bond executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder; will pay or cause to be paid, from Rental Payments by the City and other amounts received in respect of the Lease or available under this Indenture, the principal of, premium (if any) on and interest on every Bond issued hereunder on the dates, at the places and in the manner prescribed in the Bonds in any, coin or currency which, on the respective dates of payment of such principal and interest, is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts; and will cause such amounts received to be deposited with the Trustee prior�to -the due date of each installment of principal and interest and prior to the maturity of any Bond, in amounts sufficient to pay such installment; provided, however; that the principal of and interest on any Bond is not and shall not be deemed to represent a debt or pledge the faith or credit of the Authority, the City, the County of Hennepin or the State of Minnesota or grant to the Holder of any Bond any right to have the Authority, the City, the County of Hennepin or the State of Minnesota levy any taxes or appropriate any funds to the payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds, such payment to be made solely and only out of the moneys received pursuant to the Lease and the funds and accounts established and maintained with the Trustee pursuant to the requirements of this Indenture and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds by the Indenture. Section 6.2 Extensions of Payments of Bonds. It shall not directly or indirectly extend or assent to the extension of the maturity of any of the Bonds, or the time of payment of any claims for interest by the purchase or refunding of such Bonds or claims for interest or by any other arrangement; and in case the maturity of any of the Bonds, or the time for payment of any such claims for interest shall be extended, such Bonds or claims for interest shall not be entitled in case of any default hereunder to the benefit of the Indenture or to any payment out of any -26= assets of the Authority or the funds (except funds held in the trust by the Trustee for the payment of particular Bonds.or claims for interest pursuant to this Indenture) held by the Trustee except subject . to the prior payment of the principal of all Bonds issued and outstanding hereunder, the maturity of which Bonds or principal installments has not been extended, and'of such portion of the accrued interest 'on the Bonds as shall not be represented--by such extended claims for interest: Nothing in this Section shall, however, be deemed to limit the right of the Authority to fund or refund at one time all of such Bonds and claims for interest. Section 6.3 Authorization. The Authority is duly authorized under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to create and issue the Bonds, to undertake the acquisition, construction, furnishing and financing of the Facilities, to execute this Indenture and assign and pledge to the Trustee the Trust Estate, including the Rental Payments, and to. make the covenants as herein provided. All necessary action,and proceedings on its part to be taken for the creation and issuance of the Bonds and the execution and delivery of this.Indenture have been duly and effectively taken. Section 6.4 Concerning the Lease. it will cause and permit the Trustee to take such action as may be necessary or advisable to enforce the covenants, terms and conditions of the Lease if such action shall, in the Trustee's discretion, be deemed to be in the best interest of the Authority or the Bondholders. The Authority shall do or cause to be done all things on its part to be performed under the Lease so that the obligations of the City thereunder shall not be impaired or excused. Section 6.5 To Observe All Covenants and Terms -- Limitations on Authority's Obligations. L It will not issue or permit to be issued any Bonds hereunder in any manner other than in accordance with the provisions of this Indenture and the agreements in that behalf herein contained, and will not suffer or permit any Event of Default to occur under this Indenture, but will faithfully observe and perform all the conditions, covenants and requirements hereof. It is expressly agreed that the Authority has no obligation to levy taxes for, or make any advance or payment or incur any expense or liability from its general funds in performing, any of the conditions, covenants or requirements of the.Bonds or this Indenture or from any funds other than revenues and income. received pursuant to the Lease or moneys in the funds and accounts provided for herein.- Section 6.6 Liens. The Authority agrees it will not mortgage, sell or otherwise encumber its interests in the Land and Facilities during the term of the Lease, except pursuant to the Lease or as otherwise permitted in the Ground Lease, Lease or this Indenture. ARTICLE VII EVENTS OF DEFAULT; REMEDIES Section 7.1 Events of Default. Each of the following events is hereby defined as, and is declared to be and to constitute, an "Event of Default ": -21- (a) If payment of the principal of, or premium, if any, on any of the Bonds, when the same shall become due and payable, whether at maturity or by proceedings for redemption (by redemption, declaration or otherwise), shall not be made; or (b) If payment of any interest on the Bonds when the same shall become due and payable (in which case interest shall be payable to the extent permitted by law on any overdue installments of interest, in each case at the interest rate borne by the Bonds in respect of which such interest is overdue) shall not be made; or (c) If an Event of Default shall occur and be subsisting under Section 10.1 of the Lease; or (d) If default shall be made in the performance or observance of any other of the covenants, agreement or conditions on the part of the Authority in this Indenture, or in the Bonds contained, and such default shall have continued for a period of thirty days after written notice thereof given to the Authority by the Trustee. Section 7.2 Enforcement of Covenants and Conditions. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default or breach of any of the covenants and conditions of this Indenture, or to protect the Trust Estate, the Trustee, anything herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding and without any request from any Bondholder (subject, however, to the provisions of Section 8.6 hereof), may take such action or actions for the enforcement of its rights and the rights of the Bondholders and the rights of the Authority under the Lease as due diligence, prudence and care would require and to pursue the same with like diligence, prudence and care. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Trustee may, and shall upon the written request of the Holders of not less than twenty -five per centum (25 %) in aggregate principal amount of Outstanding Bonds, by written notice to the Authority, declare the principal of the Bonds to be immediately due and payable, whereupon that portion of the principal of the Bonds thereby coming due and the interest thereon accrued to the date of payment shall, without further action, become and be immediately due and payable, anything in this Indenture or in the Bonds to the contrary notwithstanding. Upon the happening and continuance of an Event of Default, the Trustee may, and shall upon the written request of the Holders of not less than twenty -five per centum (25 %) in aggregate principal amount of outstanding Bonds, proceed forthwith by suit or suits at law or in equity or by any other appropriate remedy to enforce payment of the Bonds, to enforce application to such payment of the funds, revenues and income appropriated thereto by this Indenture and by the Bonds, to enforce rights of the Authority under the Lease, and to enforce any such other appropriate legal or equitable remedy as the Trustee, being advised by counsel, shall deem most effectual to protect and enforce any of its rights or any of the rights of the Bondholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Trustee need not, proceed upon any such written request of the Bondholders, as aforesaid, unless the Bondholders shall have offered to the Trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be incurred therein or thereby. -28- Section 7.3 Application of Moneys. All moneys received by the Trustee pursuant to any right given or action taken under the provisions of this Indenture or the Lease, shall, after payment4of the cost and expenses of the proceedings resulting in the collection of such moneys and of the fees, expenses, liabilities and advances incurred or made by the Trustee, be deposited in the Bond Fund.and all moneys in the Bond Fund- maintained with the Trustee shall be applied . as follows: (a) Unless the principal of all the Bonds shall have become due and payable, all such moneys shall be applied: . First: To the payment to the Bondholders, entitled thereto of all installments of interest then due on the - Bonds, in the order of the maturity of the installments of such interest, and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full any particular installment, then to the payment ratably, according to the amounts due on such installment, to the Bondholders entitled thereto, without any discrimination or privilege; and Second: To the payment to the Bondholders entitled thereto of the unpaid principal of any of the Bonds which shall have become due (other than Bonds called for redemption for "the payment of which moneys are held pursuant to the provisions of this Indenture),, in the order of their due dates, and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full Bonds due on any particular date, then to the payment ratably, according to the amount of principal due on such date, to the Bondholders entitled thereto without any discrimination or privilege. (b) . If the principal of all the Bonds shall have become due, all such moneys shall be applied to the payment of the principal and interest then due and unpaid upon the Bonds, without preference or priority of principal over interest or of interest over principal, or of any installment of interest over any other installment of interest, or of any Bond over any other Bond, ratably, according to the amounts due respectively for. principal and interest, to the Bondholders entitled thereto without any discrimination or privilege. Whenever moneys are to be applied by the Trustee pursuant to the provisions of this Section, such moneys shall be applied by it at such times, and from time to time, as the Trustee shall determine, having due regard to the amount of such moneys available for application and the likelihood of additional moneys becoming available for such application in the future. , Whenever the Trustee shall apply such funds, it shall fix the date (which shall be an Interest Payment Date unless it shall deem I another date more suitable) upon which such application is to be made and upon such date interest on the amounts of principal to be paid on such dates shall cease to accrue. The Trustee shall give such notice as it may deem appropriate of the deposit with it of any such moneys and of the fixing of any such date, and shall not be required to make payment to the Holder of any Bond until such Bond'shall be presented to the Trustee for appropriate endorsement or for cancellation if fully paid. -29- Whenever all Bonds and interest thereon have been paid under the provisions of this Section and all expenses and charges of the Trustee and the Authority have been paid, any balance remaining shall be paid to the persons entitled to receive the same; if no other person shall be entitled thereto, then the balance shall be paid to the City. Section 7.4 Right of Trustee to Act Without Possession of Bonds. All rights of action (including the right to file proof of claim) under this Indenture, the Lease or under any of the Bonds, may be enforced by the Trustee without the possession of any of the Bonds or the production thereof in any trial or other proceeding relating thereto, and any such suitor proceeding instituted by the Trustee shall be brought in its name as Trustee, without the necessity of joining as.plaintiffs or defendants any Holders of the Bonds hereby secured, and any recovery of judgment shall be for the equal benefit of the Holders of the Outstanding Bonds, subject to the provisions of Section 6.02 hereof with respect to extended Bonds and claims for interest. Section 7.5 Power of Maiority of Bondholders. Anything in this Indenture to the contrary notwithstanding, the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of Bonds Outstanding hereunder shall have the right, at any time, by an instrument or instruments in writing executed and delivered to the Trustee, to direct the method and place of conducting all proceedings to be taken under this Indenture and the Lease; provided, that such direction shall not be otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of law and that the Trustee shall be indemnified as provided in Section 8.06. Section 7.6 Limitation on Suits by Bondholders. No Holder of any Bond shall have any right to institute any suit, action or proceeding in equity or at law for the enforcement of this Indenture or for the execution of any trust hereof or for any other remedy hereunder, unless an Event of Default has occurred of which the Trustee has been notified or of which it is deemed to have notice; nor unless the Holders of twenty -five per centum (25 %) in aggregate principal amount of Bonds outstanding hereunder shall have made written request to the Trustee and shall have offered it reasonable opportunity either to proceed to exercise the powers hereinbefore granted or to institute such action, suit or proceeding in its own name; nor unless also they shall have offered to the Trustee indemnity as provided hereinafter; and such notification, request and offer of indemnity are hereby declared in every such case at the option of the Trustee to be conditions precedent to the execution of the powers and trusts of this Indenture, and to any action or cause of action for enforcement or for any other remedy hereunder; it being understood and intended that no one or more Holders of the Bonds shall have any right in any manner whatsoever to affect, disturb, or prejudice the lien of this Indenture by his or their action or to enforce any right hereunder except in the manner herein provided, and that all proceedings at law or in equity shall be instituted, had and maintained in the manner herein provided and for the equal benefit of the Holders of all Bonds outstanding hereunder. Nothing in this Indenture contained shall, however, affect or impair the right of any Bondholder, which is absolute and unconditional, to enforce and bring suit for the payment of the principal of and interest on any Bond at and after the maturity thereof to pay the principal of and interest on each of the Bonds issued hereunder to the respective Holders thereof at the time and place in said Bonds expressed, in accordance with the terms of the Bonds. -30- Section 7.7 Waiver by Bondholders. The Trustee, upon the written request of the Holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the Bonds at the time outstanding hereunder, shall waive any Event of,Default hereunder and its consequences, except an Event of Default in the payment of the principal of the Bonds at the -date of maturity specified therein; provided, however, that an Event of Default in the payment of interest on the Bonds shall not be waived unless, prior to such waiver, all arrears of interest and all expenses of the Trustee shall have been paid or shall have been provided for by deposit with the Trustee of a sum sufficient to pay the same. In case of any such waiver, the Authority, the Trustee and the Holders of the Bonds shall be restored to their former positions and rights hereunder respectively. No such waiver shall extend to any subsequent or other Event of Default or impair any right consequent thereon. Section 7.8 Remedies Cumulative Delay Not To Constitute Waiver. No remedy by the terms of this Indenture or the Lease, conferred upon or reserved to the Trustee (or to the Bondholders) is intended to be exclusive of any, other remedy, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to any other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any Event of Default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such Event of Default or acquiescence therein, and every such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. No waiver of any Event of Default hereunder, whether by the Trustee or by the Bondholders, shall extend to or shall affect any subsequent Event of Default or shall impair any rights or remedies consequent thereon. Section 7.9 Restoration of Rights Upon Discontinuance of Proceedings. In case the Trustee or Bondholders shall have proceeded to enforce any right under this Indenture and such proceedings shall have been discontinued or abandoned for any reason, or shall have been determined adversely to the Trustee or the Bondholders, then and in every such case the Authority, the City, the Trustee and the Bondholders shall be restored to their former positions and rights hereunder with respect to the Trust Estate, and all rights, remedies and powers of the Trustee and the Bondholders shall continue as if no such proceedings had been taken. ARTICLE VIII CONCERNING THE TRUSTEE , Section 8.1 Acceptance of Trust and Prudent Performance Thereof. The Trustee, prior to the occurrence of an Event of Default and after the curing of all such Events of Default as may have .occurred, undertakes to perform such duties and only such duties as are specifically set forth in this Indenture. The Trustee shall, during the existence of any such Event of Default which has not been cured, exercise such of the rights and powers vested in it by this Indenture, and use_the same degree of care and skill in their exercise, as a prudent person would exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of his or her own affairs. -31- The Trustee shall not be required to take notice or be deemed to have notice of any Default hereunder, except Default in the deposits or payments specified herein, or failure by the Authority or the City to file with it any of the documents required, or to deposit with it evidence of any insurance policies required hereunder or under the Lease, unless the Trustee shall be specifically notified in writing of such Default by the City, by the Authority or by the Holders of at least twenty -five per centum (25 %) in aggregate principal amount of Bonds outstanding hereunder, and all notices or other instruments required by this Indenture to be delivered to the Trustee must, in order to be effective, be delivered at the office of the Trustee, and in the absence of such notice so delivered, the Trustee may conclusively assume that there is no Default, except as aforesaid. No provision of this Indenture shall be construed to relieve the Trustee from liability for its own negligent action, its own negligent failure to act,. or its own willful misconduct, except that (a) prior to such an Event of Default hereunder, and after the curing of all such Events of Default which may have occurred: exist: (1) the duties and obligations of the Trustee shall be determined solely by the express provisions of this Indenture, and the Trustee shall not be liable except for the performance of such duties and obligations as are specifically set forth in this Indenture, and no implied covenants or obligations shall be read into this Indenture against the Trustee, and (2) in the absence of bad faith on the part of the Trustee, the Trustee may conclusively rely, as to the truth of the statements and to the correctness of the opinions expressed therein, upon any certificate or opinion furnished to the Trustee conforming to the requirements of this Indenture; but in the case of any such certificate or opinion which by any provision hereof is specifically required to be furnished to the Trustee, the Trustee shall be under a duty to examine the same to determine whether or not it conforms in form to the requirements of this Indenture; and (b) at all times, regardless of whether or not any such Event of Default shall (1) the Trustee shall not be liable for any error of judgment made in good faith by a Responsible Officer or Officers of the Trustee unless it shall be proved that the Trustee was negligent in ascertaining the pertinent facts, and (2) the Trustee shall not be liable with respect to any action taken or omitted to be taken by it in good faith in accordance with the direction of the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of all the Bonds at the time outstanding relating to the time, method -and place of conducting any -32- proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee, or exercising any trust or power conferred upon the Trustee under this Indenture. None of the provisions contained in this Indenture shall require the Trustee to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise to incur individual financial liability in the performance -of any of its duties or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers, if it shall have reasonable grounds for believing that repayment of such funds or adequate indemnity against such risk or liability is not reasonably assured to it. Section 8.2 Trustee MU Relv Upon Certain Documents and Opinions. Except as otherwise provided in Section 8.01, (a) the Trustee may rely and shall be protected in acting upon any resolution, certificate, statement, instrument, opinion, report, notice, request, consent, order, bond or other paper or document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties; (b) any request, direction, election, order, certification or demand of the Authority or the City shall be sufficiently evidenced by an instrument signed by an Authority Representative or a City Representative, as the case may be (unless otherwise in this Indenture specifically prescribed), and any resolution of the Authority may be evidenced t6 the Trustee by a copy certified by the Secretary; (c) the Trustee may consult with counsel (who may be counsel for the Authority or the City) and the opinion of such counsel shall be full and complete authorization and protection in respect of any action taken or suffered by it hereunder in good faith and in accordance with the opinion of such counsel; and (d) whenever, in the administration of the trusts of this Indenture, the Trustee shall deem it necessary or desirable that a matter be proved or established prior to taking or suffering any action hereunder, such matter (unless other evidence in respect thereof be herein specifically prescribed) may, in the absence of negligence or bad faith on the part of the.Trustee, be deemed to be conclusively proved and established by a Certificate of the Authority or Certificate of the.City and any such Certificate shall, in the absence of negligence or bad faith on the part of the Trustee, be full warrant to the Trustee for any action taken or suffered by it under the provisions of this Indenture upon the faith thereof. Section 8.3 Trustee Not Responsible for Indenture Statements, Validity. The Trustee shall not be responsible for any recital or:statement herein, or.in the Bonds (except in respect of the certificate of the Trustee endorsed on such Bonds), or for the validity of the execution by the Authority of this Indenture or the validity or execution of the Lease or the Bond Resolution, or of any supplemental instrument, or for the sufficiency of the security of the Bonds issued hereunder or intended to be secured hereby, or for the value or title of any of the Trust Estate, or otherwise as to the maintenance of the security hereof; and the Trustee shall not be bound to ascertain or inquire as to the performance or observance of any covenant, condition or agreement on the part 59111 of the Authority or the City, except as herein set forth, but the Trustee may require of the Authority and the City full information and advice as to the performance of the covenants, conditions and agreements aforesaid and of the condition of the physical property included in the Trust Estate. The Trustee shall not be accountable for the use of any Bonds authenticated or delivered hereunder. Section 8.4 Limits on Duties and Liabilities of Trustee. The permissive right of the Trustee to do things enumerated in this Indenture'shall not be construed as a duty of the Trustee and the Trustee shall be answerable only for its own negligence or willful default. The Trustee shall not be required to give any bond or surety in respect of the execution of the said trusts and powers or otherwise in respect of the premises. Section 8.5 Monte Held in Trust. `Money held by the Trustee hereunder is held in trust but need not be segregated from other funds except to the extent required by law. The Trustee shall be under no liability for interest on any money received by it hereunder except as otherwise agreed with the Authority or the City. Section 8.6 Obligation of Trustee. The Trustee shall be under no obligation to institute any suit, or to take any proceeding under this Indenture, or to enter any appearance or in any way defend in any suit in which it may be defendant, or to take any steps in the execution of the trusts hereby created or in the enforcement of any rights and powers hereunder, until it shall have reasonable grounds for believing that repayment of all costs and expenses, outlays and counsel fees and other reasonable disbursements in connection therewith and adequate indemnity against all risk and liability is reasonably assured to it; the Trustee may, nevertheless, begin suit, or appear in and defend suit, or do anything else in its judgment proper to be done by it as such Trustee, without assurance of reimbursement or indemnity, and in such case the Trustee shall be reimbursed for all costs and expenses, outlays and counsel fees and other reasonable disbursements properly incurred in connection therewith. If the City shall fail to make such reimbursement, the Trustee may reimburse itself from any moneys in its possession under the provisions of this Indenture and shall be entitled to a preference therefor over any of the Bonds or claims for interest outstanding hereunder. Section 8.7 Notice to Bondholders. The Trustee shall give to the Holders of the Bonds whose names and addresses are known to it written notice of all Events of Default known to the Trustee by virtue of actual knowledge of a Responsible Officer, within sixty (66) days after the occurrence of an Event of Default unless such Event of Default shall have been cured before the giving of such notice; provided that, except in the case of an Event of Default in the payment of principal and interest on any of the Bonds, the Trustee shall be protected in withholding such notice if and so long as its Board of Commissioners, an executive committee or trust default committee or chief executive officer of the Trustee in good faith determines that the withholding of such notice is in the interest of the Bondholders. Section 8.8 Intervention in Judicial Proceedings. In any judicial proceeding to which the Authority or the City is a party and which in the opinion of the Trustee has a substantial bearing on the interest of owners of Bonds issued hereunder, the Trustee may intervene on behalf of , -34- Bondholders and shall do so if requested in writing by the owners of at least twenty -five percent (25 %) in the aggregate principal amount of Bonds. Outstanding hereunder. The rights and obligations of the Trustee under this Section are subject to the approval of the court having jurisdiction in the premises. _ Section 8.9 Further Invesligation by' Trustee. The resolutions, opinions, certificates and other instruments provided for in this Indenture may. -be accepted by the Trustee as conclusive evidence of the facts and conclusions stated therein and shall be in full warrant, protection and authori ty to the Trustee for its actions hereunder; but the Trustee may, in its unrestricted discretion, and shall; if requested in writing so to do by the Holders of not less than twenty -five per centum (25 %) in aggregate principal amount of Bonds Outstanding hereunder, cause to be made such independent investigation as it may- see fit, and in that event may decline to release any property, or pay over cash, or take other ation unless satisfied by such investigation of the truth and accuracy' of the matters so investigated. Section 8.10 Trustee to Retain Financial Records. The Trustee shall retain all financial statements and other reports furnished by the Authority or the City in accordance with this Indenture so long as any of the Bonds shall be Outstanding. I Section 8.11 Compensation of Trustee. All advances, counsel fees and other expenses reasonably made or incurred by. the Trustee in and about the execution of the trust hereby created and reasonable compensation to the Trustee for its services in the premises shall be paid by the City. The compensation of the Trustee shall not be limited to or by any provision of law in regard to the compensation of trustees of an express trust. If not paid by the City, the Trustee shall have a first lien, with right of payment prior to payment on account of interest or principal of any Bond issued hereunder, for reasonable compensation, expenses, advances and counsel fees incurred in and about the execution of the trusts hereby created and exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the Trustee hereunder and the cost and expense incurred in defending against any liability in the premises of any character whatsoever (unless such liability is adjudicated to have resulted from the negligence or willful default of the Trustee). Section 8.12' Trustee May Hold Bonds. The Trustee and its officers and directors may acquire and hold, or become the pledgee of, Bonds and otherwise deal with the Authority or the City in the same'manner and to the same extent and with like effect as though it were not Trustee hereunder. Section 8.13 Appointment of Trustee. There shall at all times be a trustee hereunder which shall be a trust company or bank in good standing organized and doing business under the laws of the United States or any State thereof, authorized under such laws to exercise corporate trust powers, having a combined capital and surplus of at least Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000), and subject to supervision or examination by Federal or State authority. If such association or corporation publishes, reports of condition at least annually, pursuant to law or to the'requirements of any supervising or examining authority above referred to, then for the purposes of this Section the combined capital and. surplus of such association or corporation shall be deemed to be its combined capital and surplus as set forth in its most recent report of -35- condition'so published. In case at any time the Trustee shall cease to be eligible in accordance with the provisions of this Section, and another association or corporation is eligible, the'. he Trustee shall resign immediately in the manner and with the effect specified in Section 8.16 hereof. Section 8.14 Merger of Trustee. Any corporation or association into which the Trustee may be converted or merged, or with which it may be consolidated, or to which it may sell or transfer its trust business and assets as a whole or substantially as a whole, or any corporation or association, resulting from any such conversion, sale, merger, consolidation or transfer to which it is a party, ipso facto; shall be and become successor trustee hereunder and. vested with all of the title to the Trust Estate and all the trusts, powers, discretions, immunities, privileges, and all other matters as was its predecessor, without the execution or filing of any instrument or any further act, deed or conveyance on the part of any of the parties hereto, anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding. Section 8.15 Resignation or Removal of Trustee. The Trustee may resign and be discharged from the trusts created by this Indenture by giving to the Authority and the Bondholders thirty (30) days notice in writing of such resignation, specifying a date when such resignation shall take effect. Such resignation shall take effect on the day specified in such notice, if a successor Trustee has been appointed, or upon such later date as a successor is appointed. Any Trustee hereunder may be_removed at any time -by an instrument or`instruments in wri ting, appointing a successor to the Trustee so removed, filed with the Trustee and executed by either (i) the Authority or (ii) the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the Bonds hereby secured and then Outstanding. Section 8.16 Appointment of Successor Trustee. In case at any time the Trustee shall resign or shall be removed or otherwise shall become incapable of acting, or shall be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or if a receiver of the Trustee or of its property shall be appointed, or if a public supervisory office shall take 'charge or control of the Trustee or of its property or affairs, a vacancy shall forthwith and ipso facto be created in the office of such Trustee hereunder, and a successor may be appointed by either (i) the Authority or (ii) the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the Bonds hereby secured and then Outstanding, by an instrument or instruments in writing filed with the Trustee and executed by such Bondholders, notification thereof being given to the Authority, but in the event the Trustee has been removed by action of the Bondholders, until a new Trustee shall be appointed by the Bondholders as herein` authorized, the Authority may, subject to the provisions hereof, appoint a Trustee to fill such vacancy. After any appointment by the Authority, in the event the Trustee has been removed by action of the Bondholders, the Trustee so appointed shall cause notice of its appointment to be mailed within 30 days of such appointment to the registered Holders of the Bonds, but any new Trustee so appointed by the Authority shall immediately and without further act be superseded by a Trustee appointed in the manner above provided by the Holders of a majority in principal amount of said Bonds whenever such appointment by said Bondholders shall be made. . 36- If, in a proper cased no timely appointment of a successor Trustee shall be made pursuant to the foregoing provisions the Holder of any Bond hereby secured or, any, retiring Trustee may apply to any court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor trustee. Said court may thereupon, after such notice, if any, as, such court may deem proper and prescribe, appoint a successor trustee. Section 8.17 Transfer of Rights and Property to Successor Trustee. Every successor trustee appointed hereunder shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to its predecessor and also to the Authority an instrument in writing accepting such appointment hereunder, and thereupon such successor; without any further act, deed or conveyance, shall become fullyvested with all the estates, properties, rights,.powers, trusts, duties and obligations of its predecessor; but such predecessor shall, nevertheless, on the written request of the Authority or of its successor execute and deliver an instrument transferring to such successor all the estate, properties; rights, powers and trusts. of such predecessor hereunder, and every predecessor trustee shall deliver all securities and moneys held:by'it as Trustee hereunder to its successor. Should any assignment, conveyance or instrument'in writing from the Authority be required by any successor trustee for more fully and certainly vesting in such successor trustee the estates, rights, powers and duties hereby vested or intended to be vested in the predecessor trustee; any and all such assignments, conveyances and instruments in writing shall, on request, be executed, acknowledged and delivered by the Authority. The resignation. of any Trustee and the instrument or instruments removing any Trustee and appointing a sucessor hereunder, together with all assignments, conveyances and other instruments provided for in this Article shall, at the expense of the City, be forthwith filed and/or recorded by the successor trustee in each recording office where the Indenture shall have been filed and/or recorded. Section 8.18 Appointment of Successor or Alternate Paying Agents. In the event the initial Trustee shall also have been appointed paying agent for the Series 2014 Bonds or for any Additional Bonds, a successor Trustee shall become successor paying agent with respect to such Bonds unless otherwise provided in the instrument appointing such successor Trustee. If any paying agent other than the initial Trustee shall resign or become incapable of.. acting, or shall be removed under a supplemental indenture entered into pursuant to the terms hereof, the Trustee may appoint a successor paying _agent which is a bank or trust company qualified to act as paying agent under the laws of the State of Minnesota and which is willing to accept the. office on reasonable and customary terms approved by an Authority Representative. The Trustee may appoint successor paying, agents. "Paying agent" as used in this Section refers to the bank or trust company named in the form of Bond provided for the Series 2014 Bonds in the recitals hereof, or provided for Additional Bonds in a supplemental indenture, where principal of and interest on Bonds may be paid.` ARTICLE IX CONCERNING THE BONDHOLDERS Section 9.1 Execution of Instruments by Bondholders. Any, request, direction, consent or other instrument in writing required by this Indenture to be signed or executed by Bondholders may be in any number of concurrent instruments of similar tenor and may be signed -37- or executed by su& Bondholders in person or by agent duly appointed by an instrument in writing. Proof of the execution of any such instrument and of the ownership of Bonds shall be sufficient for any purpose of this Indenture and shall be conclusive in favor of the Trustee with regard to any action taken by it under such instrument if made in the - following manner: (a) The fact and date of the execution by any person of any such instrument may be proved by the certificate of any officer in any jurisdiction who, by the laws thereof, has power to take acknowledgments of deeds to be recorded within such jurisdiction, to the effect that the person signing such instrument acknowledged to him the execution thereof, or by an, affidavit of a witness to such execution. (b) The ownership of Bonds shall be proved by the registration books kept under the provisions of this Indenture. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed as limiting the Trustee to the proof above specified, it being intended that the Trustee may accept any other evidence of the matters herein stated which to it may seem sufficient. Section 9.2 Waiver of Notice. Any notice or other communication required by this Indenture to be given by delivery, publication or otherwise to the Bondholders or any one or more thereof may be waived, at any time before such notice or communication is so required to be given, by a writing ,mailed or delivered to the Trustee by the Holder or Holders of all of the Bonds entitled 'to such notice or communication. Section 9.3 Determination of Bondholder Concurrence. In determining whether the Holders of 'the requisite aggregate principal amount of Bonds have concurred in any demand, request, direction, consent or waiver under this Indenture, Bonds which are owned by the Authority or the City shall be disregarded and deemed not to be Outstanding for the purpose of any such determination; provided, that for the purpose of determining whether the Trustee shall be protected in relying on any such demand, request, direction, consent or waiver only Bonds which the Trustee knows to be so owned shall be disregarded. Bonds so owned which have been pledged in good faith may be regarded as Outstanding for the purposes of this Section if the pledgee shall establish to the satisfaction of the Trustee the pledgee's right to vote such Bonds and that the pledgee is not a person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under common control with the Authority or the City. In case of a dispute as to such right, any decision by the Trustee taken upon the advice of counsel shall be full protection to the Trustee. Section 9.4 Bondholders' Meeting. A meeting of the Bondholders maybe called at any time and from time to time for any of the following purposes: (1) to give any notice to the Authority or to the Trustee, or to give any direction to the Trustee, or to make any request of the Trustee, or to consent to the waiving of any Event of Default hereunder and its consequences, .or to take any other action authorized to be taken by Bondholders pursuant to any of the provisions of Article VII hereof; -38- (2) to remove the Trustee or appoint a successor Trustee pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII hereof; (3) subject t6Article XI hereof, to consent to the execution of an indenture or indentures supplemental hereto; (4) subject to Article XII, hereof, to consent to any amendment of the, Lease or to any instrument 'supplemental to the Lease; or . (5) to take any other action authorized to betaken by or on behalf of the Holders of any percentage of the Outstanding Bonds under any other provisions of this Indenture or under applicable law. Any Bondholders' meeting may be called and held as follows: (a) A meeting of Bondholders may be held at such place within the City where the Trustee has its principal office as the Trustee or, in case of its failure to act, the Authority, or Bondholders calling the meeting shall prescribe. (b) Notice of every meeting of Bondholders, setting forth the time and place of such meeting and in general terms the action proposed to be taken at such meeting, shall be mailed, postage prepaid, not less than 20 nor more than 180. days prior to the date fixed for the meeting, to each owner of Bonds. Any failure of the Trustee to mail such notice, or any defect therein shall not, however, in any way impair or affect the validity of,any such meeting. (c) In case at any time the Authority, pursuant to a resolution, or the Holders of at least ten percent (10 %) in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding, shalf have requested the Trustee to call a meeting of the Bondholders, by written request setting forth in reasonable detail the action proposed to be taken at the meeting, and the Trustee shall not have given the notice of such meeting within 20 days after receipt of such request, then the Authority or the Holders of Bonds in the amount above specified may call such meeting to take any action authorized in this Section by giving notice thereof as provided in paragraph (b) of this Section. (d) Only a Holder of one or more Bonds or a person appointed as proxy by an instrument in writing of such Holder shall be entitled to vote at or to participate with their counsel and the representatives of the Trustee and the Authority in such meeting. Each Holder shall be entitled to one vote for each $5,000 in principal amount of Outstanding Bonds held. (e) The Trustee or, in case of its failure to act, the Authority, or Bondholders calling or requesting the meeting, may make such reasonable regulations as it may deem advisable for any meeting of Bondholders in regard to proof of the holding of Bonds and of the appointment of proxies and in regard to the appointment and duties of inspectors of -39- votes, the submission and examination of proxies, certificates and other evidence of the right to vote, and such other matters concerning the conduct of the meeting as it shall deem appropriate. (f) At any meeting of Bondholders, the presence of persons owning Bonds in an aggregate principal amount sufficient under the appropriate provision of this Indenture to take action upon the business for the transaction of which such meeting was called shall constitute a quorum. Any meeting of Bondholders duly called pursuant to this Section may be adjourned from time to time by vote of the Holders (or proxies for the Holders) of a majority of the Bonds represented at the meeting and entitled to vote, whether or not a quorum shall be present; and the meeting may be held as so adjourned without further notice. (g) The vote upon any resolution submitted to any meeting of Bondholders shall be by written ballots on which shall be subscribed the signatures of the Holders of Bonds or of their representatives by proxy and the serial number or numbers of the Bonds held or represented by them. The chair of the meeting shall appoint two inspectors of votes who shall count all votes cast at the meeting for or against any resolution and who shall make and file with the secretary -of the meeting their verified written reports in duplicate of all votes cast at the meeting. A record, at least in duplicate, of the proceedings of each meeting of Bondholders shall be prepared by the secretary of the meeting and there shall be attached to said record the original reports of the inspectors of votes on any vote by ballot taken thereat and affidavits by one or more persons having knowledge of the facts setting forth a copy of the notice of the meeting and showing that said notice was mailed as provided in paragraph (b) hereof. Each copy shall be signed and verified by the affidavits of the chair and secretary of the meeting and one such copy shall be delivered to the Authority and one copy to the Trustee to be preserved by the Trustee, the latter to have attached thereto the ballots voted at the meeting. Any record so signed and verified shall be conclusive evidence of the matters therein stated. Section 9.5 Revocation by Bondholders. At any time prior to (but not after) the evidencing to the Trustee of the taking of any action by the Holders of the percentage in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds specified in this Indenture in connection with such action, any Holder of a Bond may, by filing written notice with the Trustee at its principal office, revoke any consent given by such Holder or the predecessor Holder of such Bond. Except as aforesaid, any such consent given by the Holder of any Bond shall be conclusive and binding upon such Holder and upon all future Holders and owners of such Bond and of any Bond issued in exchange therefor or in lieu thereof, irrespective of whether or not any notation in regard thereto is made upon such Bond. Any action taken by the Holders of the percentage in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds specified in this Indenture in connection with such action shall be conclusively binding upon the Authority, the Trustee and the Holders of all the Bonds. -40- ARTICLE X PAYMENT, DEFEASANCE AND RELEASE Section 10.1 Payment and Discharge of Indenture. If the Authority, its successors or assigns, shall (a) pay or cause to be paid the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds at the time and in the manner stipulated therein and herein, or (b) provide for the payment of principal and premium, if any, of the Bonds and interest thereon by depositing with the Trustee at or at any time before maturity amounts sufficient either in cash or in government securities of the type permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subd. 8, the principal and interest on which when due and payable and without consideration of any, reinvestment thereof, shall be sufficient to pay the entire amount due or to become due thereon for principal and premium, if any, and interest to maturity of all said Bonds Outstanding, or (c) deliver to the Trustee (1) proof satisfactory to the Trustee that notice of redemption of all of the Outstanding callable Bonds not surrendered or to be surrendered to it for cancellation has been given or waived as provided in Article III hereof, or that arrangements satisfactory to the Trustee have been made insuring that such notice will be given or waived, or (2) a written instrument executed by the Authority under its official seal and expressed to be irrevocable, authorizing the Trustee to give such notice for and on behalf of the Authority, or (3) file with'the Trustee a waiver of such notice of redemption signed by the Holders of all of such Outstanding Bonds, and in any such case, deposit with the Trustee before the date on which such Bonds are to be redeemed, as provided in said Article III, the entire amount of the redemption price, including accrued interest, and premium, if any, either in cash or in government securities of the type permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subd. 8, in such aggregate face amount, bearing interest at such rates and maturing at such dates as shall be sufficient to provide for the payment of such redemption price on the date such Bonds are to be redeemed, and on such prior dates when principal of and interest on the Outstanding Bonds is due and payable, or (d) surrender to the Trustee for cancellation all Bonds for which payment is not so provided, and shall also pay all other sums due and payable hereunder by the Authority, then and in that case, all the Trust Estate shall revert to the Authority and the City as their interests may appear, and the entire estate, right, title and interest of the Trustee and of the owners of the Bonds shall.thereupon cease, determine and become void; and the Trustee in such case, upon the cancellation of all Bonds for the payment of which cash or securities shall not have been deposited in accordance with the provisions of this Indenture, shall, upon receipt of a written request of the Authority, and at its cost and expense; execute to the Authority, or its order, proper instruments acknowledging satisfaction of this Indenture and surrender to the -41- Authority and the City, as their interests appear, all cash and deposited securities, if any (other than cash or securities -for the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon), which shall then be held hereunder as a part of the Trust Estate. In case of any discharge of the lien of the Indenture pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) above, there shall be submitted to the Trustee (i) an'Opinion of Counsel, which opinion may be based upon a ruling or rulings of the Internal Revenue Service, to the effect that the interest on the Bonds.being discharged will not become includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes, notwithstanding the discharge of the Indenture, and that all requirements of the Lease and Indenture for the defeasance of the Bonds have been complied with and (ii) a report in form and substance acceptable to the Trustee of an independent accountant acceptable to the.Trustee to the effect that the payment when due of the principal of and the interest on the government securities of the type permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subd. 8; deposited with the Trustee will provide, together with any other moneys which shall have been deposited with the Trustee for such purpose, sufficient moneys to pay all principal and interest on the Outstanding Bonds when due. Nothing contained in this Section 10.1 shall be construed to prohibit the defeasance of one or more, but not all, series of Bonds by any of the methods set forth in clauses (a), (b), (c) or (d) above, as the same would apply to the particular series of Bonds being discharged. Section 10.2 Bonds Deemed Not Outstanding After Deposits. When there shall have been deposited at any time with the Trustee in trust for the purpose, cash or government securities of the type permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, subd. 8, the principal and interest on which shall be sufficient to pay the principal of any Bonds when the same become due, either at maturity or otherwise, or at the date fixed for the redemption thereof and to pay all interest with respect thereto at the due dates for such interest or to the date fixed for redemption, for the use and benefit of the Holders thereof, then upon such deposit all such Bonds shall cease to be entitled to any lien, benefit or security of this Indenture except the right to receive the funds so deposited, and such Bonds shall be deemed not to be Outstanding hereunder; and it shall be the duty of the Trustee to hold the cash and securities so deposited for the benefit of the Holders of such Bonds, and from and after such date, redemption date or maturity, interest on such Bonds thereof called for redemption shall cease to accrue. Section 10.3 Unclaimed Money to be Returned. Any moneys deposited with the Trustee pursuant to the terms of this Indenture, for the payment or redemption of Bonds, and the payment of interest and redemption premium with respect thereto, and remaining unclaimed by the Holders of the Bonds for a period of two years and eleven months after the due date or the date fixed for redemption of the same, as the case may be, shall, upon the written request of the Authority, and if the Authority or any successor to the obligations of the Authority under this Indenture and the Bonds shall not at the time, to the knowledge of the Trustee, be in default with respect to any of the terms and conditions contained in the Indenture or in the Bonds, be paid to the Authority, and such Holders of the Bonds shall thereafter look only to the Authority, for payment and then only to the extent of the amounts so received without interest thereon. -42- ARTICLE XI SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURES Section 11.1 P=oses for Which Supplemental Indentures May be Executed. The Authority, upon resolution,-and the Trustee fr om time to time and at any time, subject to the conditions and restrictions in this Indenture contained, may enter into such indentures supplemental hereto as may or shall by them be deemed necessary or desirable without the consent of any Bondholder'for any one or more ofthe following purposes: (a) To correct the description of any property hereby pledged or intended so to be, or to assign, convey, pledge or transfer and set over unto the Trustee, subject to such liens or other encumbrances as shall be therein specifically described, additional ' property,or properties of the Authority or the City for the equal and proportional benefit and security of the Holders and owners of all Bonds at any time issued and Outstanding under this Indenture, subject, however, to the provisions hereinabove set forth with respect to extended Bonds; (b) To add to the covenants and. agreements of the Authority in this Indenture contained other covenants and agreements thereafter to be observed, or to surrender any right or power reserved to or conferred upon the Authority or to or upon any successor; (c) To evidence the succession or successive successions of any other department, agency, body or corporation to the Authority and the assumption by such successor of the covenants, agreements and obligations of the Authority in the Bonds hereby secured and in this Indenture and in any and every supplemental indenture contained or the succession, removal or appointment of any trustee or paying agent hereunder; (d) To cure any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any provision contained herein or in any supplemental indentures which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provision contained herein or in any supplemental indenture, or to make such other provisions in regard to matters or questions arising under this Indenture or any supplemental indenture as the Authority may deem necessary or desirable and which shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of this Indenture or any supplemental indenture and which shall not impair the security of the same; (e) To modify, eliminate and/or add to the provisions of this Indenture to such extent as shall be necessary to effect the qualification of this Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as then amended, or under any similar Federal statute . hereafter enacted, and to add to this Indenture such other provisions as may be expressly, permitted by said Trust Indenture Act of 1939, excluding, however, the provisions referred to in Section 316(a)(2) of said Trust Indenture Act of 1939; and (f) To provide for the issuance of Additional Bonds pursuant to this Indenture. -43- Section 11.2 Execution of Supplemental Indenture. The Trustee is authorized to join with the Authority in the execution of any such supplemental indenture; to make. the further agreements and stipulations'which may be therein contained, and accept the conveyance, transfer and assignment of any property thereunder, but the Trustee shall not be obligated to enter into any such supplemental indenture which affects its rights, duties or immunities under this Indenture. Section 11.3 Discretion of Trustee. In each and every case provided for in this Article (other than a supplemental indenture approved by the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds pursuant to Section 11.4 hereof), the Trustee shall be entitled to exercise its unrestricted discretion in determining whether or not any proposed supplemental indenture or any term or provisions therein contained is necessary or desirable, having in view the needs of the Authority and the respective rights and interests of the Holders of Bonds theretofore issued hereunder; and the Trustee shall be under no responsibility or liability to the Authority or to the City or to any Holder of any Bond, or to anyone whatever, for any act or thing which it may do or decline to do in good faith subject to the provisions of this Article, in the exercise of such discretion. Section 11.4 Modification of Indenture with Consent of Bondholders. Subject to the terms and provisions contained in this Section, the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding shall have the right, from time to time, to consent to and approve the execution by the Authority and the Trustee of such indenture or indentures supplemental hereto as shall be deemed necessary or desirable by the Authority for the purpose of modifying, altering, amending, adding to or rescinding in any particular, any of the terms or provisions contained in this Indenture or in any supplemental indenture; provided, however, that, notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture, nothing herein contained shall permit or be construed as permitting, without the consent of the Holders of all Outstanding Bonds affected thereby, (a) an extension of the maturity of any Bond issued hereunder, or (b) a reduction in the principal amount of any Bond or the redemption premium or the rate of interest thereon, or (c) the creation of a lien upon or a pledge of revenues ranking prior to or on a parity with the lien or pledge created by this Indenture, or (d) a preference or priority of any Bond or Bonds over any other Bond or Bonds, or (e) a reduction in the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds required to consent to supplemental indentures or amendments to the Lease, or (f) a reduction in the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds required to waive an Event of Default. Whenever the Authority shall deliver to the Trustee a resolution of Bondholders adopted at a Bondholders' meeting approved by, or an instrument or instruments purporting to be executed by, the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding, which resolution or instrument or instruments shall refer to the proposed supplemental indenture and shall specifically consent to and approve the execution thereof, thereupon, the Authority and the Trustee may execute such supplemental indenture without liability or responsibility to any Holder of any Bond, whether or not such Holder shall have consented thereto. -44- If the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds outstanding at the time of the execution of such supplemental indenture shall have consented to and approved the execution thereof as herein provided, no Holder of any Bond shall have any right to object to the execution of such supplemental indenture, or to�objOct to any of the terms and provisions contained therein or the operation thereof, or in any manner to question the propriety of the execution thereof, or to. enjoin or restrain the Trustee or the Authority from executing the same or from taking any action pursuant to the provisions thereof. Section 11.5 Supplemental Indentures to be Part of Indenture. Any supplemental indenture executed in accordance with any of the provisions of this Article shall'thereafter form a part of this Indenture; and all the terms and conditions contained in any such supplemental indenture as to any provisions authorized to be contained therein shall be and be deemed to be part of the terms and conditions of this Indenture for any and all purposes, and the respective rights, duties and obligations under this Indenture of the Authority, the Trustee and all Holders of Bonds then Outstanding shall thereafter be determined, exercised and enforced hereunder, subject in all respects to such modifications and amendments. If deemed necessary or desirable by the Trustee, reference to any such supplemental indenture or any of such terms or conditions thereof may be set forth in reasonable and customary manner in the text of the Bonds or in a legend stamped on the Bonds. Section 11.6 Rights of City Unaffected. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, a supplemental indenture under this Article XI which adversely affects the rights of the City under the Lease, so long as the Lease is in effect, shall not become effective unless and until the City consents to the execution and delivery of such supplemental indenture. The Trustee shall cause notice of the proposed execution and delivery of any such supplemental indenture to the execution and delivery of which the City has not already consented, together with a copy of the proposed supplemental indenture, to be mailed to the City at least 30 days prior to the proposed date of execution and delivery of any such supplemental indenture. Section 11.7 Rights of Authority. The Authority has no duty or obligation to consent to any supplemental indenture or other instrument amending the terms hereof and may, at the expense of the City, request and.receive an opinion of such counsel as the Authority may select in connection with any matter relating to a proposed amendment to this Indenture. Section 11.8 Notice to Rating Agencies. The Authority will send by certified mail, or overnight delivery service, to any rating agency then maintaining a rating on the Bonds, a copy of any proposed supplemental indenture not less than 20 Business Days prior to its proposed execution or adoption. ARTICLE XII AMENDMENTS TO THE LEASE Section 12.1 Amendments to the Lease Not Requiring Consent of Bondholders. The Authority, the City and the Trustee may, without the consent of or notice to the Bondholders, consent to any amendment, change or modification of the Lease as may be required (i) by the -45- provisions of the Lease and this Indenture, (ii) in connection with the issuance of Additional Bonds as provided herein, (iii) in connection with the financing of any additions or expansions of the Facilities, so long as such amendments do not affect the obligation of the City to make Rental Payments as they become due and payable, (iv) for the purpose of curing any ambiguity or formal defect or omission, or (v) in connection with any other change therein which, in the judgment of the. Trustee, is not to the prejudice of the Trustee or the Holders of the Bonds. Section 12.2 Amendments to Lease Requiring Consent of Bondholders:. Except. for the amendments, changes or modifications as provided in Section 12.1 hereof, neither the Authority nor the Trustee shall consent to any other amendment, change or modification of the Lease without the written approval or consent of the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds at the time Outstanding given and procured as in this Section provided; provided, however, that no such amendment, change or modification shall ever affect the obligation of the City to make Rental Payments as they become due and payable. If the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds Outstanding hereunder at the time of the execution of any such amendment, change or modification shall have consented to and approved the execution thereof as herein provided, no Holder of any Bond, shall have any right to object to any of the terms and provisions contained therein, or in the operaion thereof, or in any manner to question the propriety of the execution thereof, or to enjoin or restrain the Trustee, the Authority or the City from executing the same or from taking any action pursuant to the provisions thereof. Section 12.3 Rights of Authority. The Authority has no duty or obligation to consent to any proposed amendment to'the Lease and may, at the expense of the City, request and receive an opinion of such counsel as the Authority may select in connection with any matter relating to a proposed amendment to the Lease. Section 12.4 Notice to Rating Agencies. The Authority will send by certified mail, or overnight delivery service, to any rating agency then maintaining a rating on the Bonds, a copy of any proposed amendment to the Lease not less than 20 Business Days prior to its proposed execution or adoption. ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS Section 13.1 Rights in Authority are Held Solely for Benefit of Bondholders. All rights, title and interest created in the Authority pursuant to the Lease are held by the Authority solely for the benefit of the Owners of the Bonds issued pursuant to this Indenture, and are not created in the Authority in its individual capacity or for its own account or benefit for any reason whatsoever. All such rights, title and interest have been irrevocably and absolutely assigned and conveyed in their entirety to the Trustee for the benefit of the Owners of the Bonds issued pursuant to this Indenture. Section 13.2. Covenants of Authority Bind Successors and Assigns. All the covenants, stipulations, promises and agreements in this Indenture contained, by or in behalf of the -46- Authority, shall bind and inure to the benefit of its successors and assigns, whether so expressed or not. Section 13.3 °Immunity.of Officers. No recourse for the payment of any part of the principal of or interest on any Bond.or for the satisfaction of any liability arising from, founded upon or existing -by reason of the issue, purchase or ownership of the Bonds shall be had against any officer, member or agent of the Board of Commissioners of the Authority, the Authority, the City or the State of Minnesota, as such,. all such liability being hereby expressly released and waived as a condition of and as a part of the consideration for the execution of this Indenture and the issuance of the Bonds. Section 13:4 No Benefits to Outside Parties. Nothing in this Indenture, express or implied, is intended or shall be construed to confer upon or to give to any person or corporation, other than the City, the parties hereto . and the Holders of the Bonds issued hereunder, any right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Indenture or covenant, condition or stipulation thereof; and the covenants, stipulations and agreements in this Indenture contained are and shall be for sole and exclusive benefit of the City, the parties hereto, their successors; and the Holders of the Bonds. Section 13.5 Separability of Indenture Provisions. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Indenture or in the Bonds shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity; illegality or uinenforceability shall not affect any other provisions of this Indenture, but this Indenture shall be construed as if such invalid or illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. Section 13.6 Execution of Indenture in Counterparts. This Indenture may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Section 13.7 Headings Not Controlling. The headings of the several Articles and Sections hereof are inserted for the convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof. Section 13.8 Notices etc to Trustee Authority and City. Any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent of.Bondholders or other document provided or permitted by this Indenture shall be sufficient for any purpose under this Indenture or the Lease, when mailed by first class mail (except as otherwise provided in this Indenture) (with a copy to the other part ies) at the following addresses (or such other address as may be provided by any party by notice) and shall be deemed to be effective upon receipt: To the Trustee: U.S. Bank National Association 60 Livingston Avenue Saint Paul, Minnesota 55107 -2292 Attn: Corporate Trust Department -47- To the Authority: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: Executive Director To the City: City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: City Manager -48- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment. Authority , by its Board of Commissioners, has caused this Indenture to be signed in its name by its Chair and Secretary, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, to evidence its acceptance of the trust hereby created, has caused this Indenture to be signed in its name by an authorized officer of the Trustee, all as of the day and year first above written. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Chair Attest Secretary U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By Its -49- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. HENNEPIN COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on July _, 2014, by James Hovland, and Ann Swenson, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Minnesota, a Minnesota political subdivision, on behalf of the political subdivision. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. RAMSEY COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on July , 2014, by , the Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of such association. Notary Public -50- EXHIBIT A The real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: A -1 EXHIBIT B DRAW REQUEST NO. PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2014 (ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LEASE OBLIGATIONS) The undersigned, a duly authorized City Representative pursuant to that certain Trust Indenture (Recreational Facilities), dated as of July 1, 2014 (the "Indenture "), between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Minnesota and U.S. Bank National Association (the "Trustee ") hereby requests and directs the Trustee to make the disbursements to the persons and in the amounts set forth below from the Construction Fund pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.4 of the Indenture: Purpose of payee Work Performed Amount The undersigned certifies to the Trustee that each obligation, item of cost or expense mentioned above has been properly incurred, is an item of Project Cost and is a proper charge against the Construction Fund and has not been the basis of any previous withdrawal. The amount to be paid or which has been paid is correct and accurate and the City has and will maintain in its possession evidence of the same whether by invoice, statement for services or otherwise. Dated: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA M-1 City Representative To: Members of Edina _Housing and Redevelopment Authority From: Brian E Olson, PE, Director of Public Works 3,60 Date: June IT 2014 11:% a, lit � 9�1r�� o Fe t4 in Agenda Item #: HRA A The Recommended Bid is M Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid, Contract 3, Improvement P -23, 50th & France District Parking & Wayfinding Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: June 5, 2014 June 5, 2014 Company: Bid Package 3 Bloomington Electric Company Premier Electrical Corporation Choice Electric, Inc. Preferred Electric Amount of Quote or Bid: $387,900.00 $396,250.00 $408,000.00 $461,530.00 r- Recommended Quote or Bid: Bid Package 3 Bloomington Electric Company $387,900.00 General Information: On August 20, 2013 City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility Study for the 50th & France Parking and way finding Improvement Project, Edina Improvement no.P -23: This report was completed and prepared and presented on January 21, 2014 by Kimly -Horn and Associates. Project P -23 was approved on March 4,2014. This project includes the 3 Parking Ramp Facilities Located in the 50th and France Business District, that are owned and maintained by the City. The project involves a Way finding System on the four main entrances into the District, along with a streetscape improvements. The Project also includes both structural restoration and painting of each ramp. A fifth contract will be for parking ramp light fixture replacement and that bid has been postponed until June 5th. We anticipate that contract to be awarded on the June 17t City Council agenda. The project was bid with five bid packages because the Project Management Team determined the city would likely benefit.by the project being delivered in separate bid packages, because that approach, given a low -bid selection process, tends to select more experienced contractors for the specialty work. Bloomington Electric Company was the low bidder on Contract 3 for the Parking Structure Lighting Replacement. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Page 2 This project cost will be borne by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Considering the bid unit prices, we are anticipating a savings of $162,100.00. The final special assessments will be calculated prior to the final assessment hearing in 2015. Staff recommends awarding Bid Package 3 to Bloomington Electric Company; City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Kim ley > »Horn June 10, 2014 Mr. Brian Olson, P.E. Public Works Director City of Edina Public Works Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 RE: Recommendation of Bids 50th & France District Improvements Edina-Improvement No. P -23 Bid Package #3 — Parking Structure Lighting Replacement Dear Mr. Olson: On Thursday, June 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, bids were received on the 50`" & France District Improvements project, Edina Improvement No. P -23, Bid Package #3. The 50'' &France District Improvements project is being delivered in five bid packages, four of which were opened on Thursday,. May 22, 2014. The Project Management Team determined the city would likely benefit by the project being delivered in separate bid packages, because that approach, given a low -bid selection process, tends to select more experienced contractors for the specialty. work. Bids were. received on Bid Package #3 from four (4) contractors as follows: Bid Package #3 — Parking Structure. Lighting Improvements Contractor Base:Bid Amount Bloomington Electric Company $387,900:00 Premier. Electrical Corporation $396,250.00 Choice Electric, Inc. $408,000.00 Preferred Electric, Inc. $461,530.00 Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost $550,000.00 All. bids were submitted with proper guarantees in the amount of five percent (5 %) of the to bid as required by the Project Manual. All bids.acknowledged the two (2) addenda that were prepared for the Bid Package #3 project. The low Base Bid is approximately 30 percent (30 %) less than the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost, No errors were found the in the preparations of their bids. A copy of the bid tabulation -foe the project is enclosed for your information. Bloomington Electric Company was the low bidder with a bid in the amount of $387,900.00. kimley- horn.com 1r2 550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 67576-75 97 Kodey *Horn Recommendation of Award Page 2 In our review,of the contractor's bids and additional discussion after the bidswere opened, we believe that Bloomington Electric Company are qualified and,capable of completing the work included. as part of Bid Package #3. Our electrical engineering sub - consultant has a positive history working with the Contractor. Taking. Bid,Package #3 in context with the other four bid packages (summarized in my May 28, 2014 Recommendation of Award letter), the bids total $2,992,030 for the five bid packages, compared to an engineer's opinion of probable cost of $3,635,000. See below for a`table summarizing the information for the five bid packages. Low Bid Opinion Over /(Under) Bid Package 1 $447,688 $325,000 $122,688 38% Bid Package 2 $863,000 $1,100,000 ($237;000) (22 %) Bid Package 3 $387,900 $550,000 ($162,100) (30 %) Bid Package 4 $1,089,045 $910,000 $179,045 16 % Bid Package 5 $204,397 $750,000 ($545,603) (73 %) $21992,030 $3,635,000 ^ ($642,970) (1.8 %) Please contact me at (651) 643 7-0451 or dan.coyleCa.kimley- horn.com if you have any, questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, Daniel J. Co P.E. Project Manager Enclosure. Bid Tabulation kimley- horn.¢om 2550 Uni ;ersity Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 419,7 Bo TABULATION CmtncC P-23 CRY OF MNA r*. 0TH & FRANCE OL87RICT IMPROVEMENTS BID PACKAGE N • PARIONG STRUCTURE LIGHTING REPLACEMENT KRA Jab Na: t101107005 ENGINEERS ESTIMATE BLOOMINGTON ELECTRIC CONPANY PREMIER ELECTRICAL CORPORATION CHOICE ELECTRIC. INC. PREFERRED ELECTRIC. INC. Bun Ne. It3m DaxrlPibR sc IINI I3us10ti UM R1q AmoWB UNt M" Am00N URII PA" AmolOB Ndt P11cs Amaml IA18 Prke Anrolml I BID PACKAGE0 PARIONG STRUCTURE UOHTINO REPLACEMENT - LUMP am 1 8880.0W.W ! 550imm 1 387.=10 $ 387AW.W f 30&250.= 1 300250.0 3 4",WO.O T 408.00090 $ . 4BI610 W E 4MST0.0 IND SUMMARY Am A-0 Amax! Am—Il Amamt CONTRACTAMOUNT 5 550.0O.W 7 W,M.W 7 .W & 40&OWW 1 al- =.W W.IA— .tI,f87O 1 680,"0.= 8 387.100.00 1. 30141exo ! 403,000.00 3 481,0"AO