Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-07-15_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2014 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of July I, 2014 And Work Session Of July 1, 2014 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 7/6/2014 TOTAL $ And Per Pre -List Dated, 7/10/2014 TOTAL $ C. New On -Sale Wine and Beer Liquor Licenses, Pie Wild, Inc. dba PizzaRev, 7529 France Avenue D. Request For Purchase — Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal E. Request For Purchase — Award of Bid, Contract ENG 14 -13 Industrial Park Lighting Improvements F. Traffic Safety Report of June 4, 2014 G. Request For Purchase — 2014 Cat 272D Skid loader, Public Works - Streets H. Resolution No. 2014 -80 Approving Public Improvement And Special Assessment Agreements V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Joe Abood, General Manager Braemar Golf Course B. Speak Up Edina Presentation 0 Agenda/Edina City Council July 15, 2014 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Rezoning, Lot Area And Width Variances, Building Coverage Variance And Side Yard Setback Variance, 4923 49th Street, Mathias Mortenson, Resolution No. 2014 -79 VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Student Appointments To Boards and Commissions I. Student Board & Commission Attendance recommendations B. Driving Range And Executive Course Renovation C. Sketch Plan Review, 4121 West 50th Street D. Sketch Plan Review, 7200 France Avenue E. Approve Final Alignment Of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail F. Resolution No. 2014 -76 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Agenda/Edina City Council July 15, 2014 Page 3 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes Human Rights & Relations Commission, May 27, 2014 Planning Commission, June 11, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jul 15 Work Session — Business Meeting/Art & Culture Donations 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jul 29 Filing Opens for Municipal Offices On November General Election CLERK'S OFFICE Mon Aug 4 Work Session —Fred Richards Redesign 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Session With Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Aug 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 5 Night To Unite Thur Aug 7 CANDIDATES INFORMATION SESSION 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 12 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M. Tues Aug 12 Filing Closes for Municipal Offices On November General Election S:00 P.M. CLERK'S OFFICE Tues Aug 19 Work Session —Blake Road Corridor Study /2015 Budget Preview 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Sep I LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sep 2 Work Session — Grandview Development Partner Interviews 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 16 Work Session — Tree Ordinance /HPB Joint Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM _.es Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS !s Oct 7 Work Session — 2015 Boards /Commission Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM ue Oct 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 21 Rep. Keith Ellison Update /Business Meeting 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 1, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. IL ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.E., Request for Purchase, Squad Light Bars; IV.F. Resolution No. 2014 -77, Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement 2014 -2015; IVX Change Order — Contract ENG 14 -4 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements; and, IV.L. Resolution No. 2014 -75 Authorizing Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Grant Application for Pentagon Park South, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of June 17, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 19 2014, and consisting of 40 pages; General Fund $126,452.58; Police Special Revenue $1,740.05; - Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $21,459.70; Arts and Culture Fund $1,000.00; PIR Debt Service Fund $1,941.90; Working Capital Fund $603,377.61; Cando Fund $4,358.00; Art Center Fund $2,861.29; Golf Dome Fund $1,137.41; Aquatic Center Fund $26,233.64; Golf Course Fund $27,585.53; Ice Arena Fund $11,321.09; Edinborough Park Fund $6,308.57; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $17,426.08; Liquor Fund $209,417.81; Utility Fund $588,026.24; Storm Sewer Fund $226,954.60; Recycling Fund $35,190.09; PSTF Agency Fund $2,232.01; Centennial TIF District $1,757.50; Southdale 2 District $26,516.75; Pentagon Park District $44,308.61; TOTAL $1,987,607.06 and for receipt of payment of claims dated June 26, 2014, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $209,877.32; Police Special Revenue $98.93; Arts and Culture Fund $943.31; Working Capital Fund $540,048.84; Equipment Replacement Fund $14,825.88; Art Center Fund $4,984.29; Golf Dome Fund $670.14; Aquatic Center Fund $532.91; Golf Course Fund $37,417.79; Ice Arena Fund $54.68 -; Edinborough Park Fund $911.10; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $9,555.17; Liquor Fund $178,608.53; Utility Fund $33,849.35; Storm Sewer Fund $693.83; PSTF Agency Fund $4,953.67; Centennial TIF District $150.00; TOTAL $1,038,066.38; and, Credit Card Transactions dated April 26, 2014 — May 26, 2014; TOTAL $31,015.83 IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -71 Fiscal Year 2015 -2017 Joint Cooperation Agreement /Community Development Block Grant Renewal IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -72 Authorizing Joint Powers Agreement with the State of Minnesota — Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -74, Appointing Election Judges for August 12, 2014 Primary Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 1, 2014 IV.H. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid Contract ENG 14 -10 2014 Watermain Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northdale Construction Company, Inc. at $933,680.12 IV.I. Approve Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements IV.J. Grant First and Waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -07 Amending Chapter 26 of the Edina City Code Concerning Petty Misdemeanors Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV E. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, SQUAD LIGHT BARS —AWARDED Police Chief Nelson indicated the squad light bars were new generation LED lighting of a better quality than those currently used. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving Request for Purchase, Squad Light Bars, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Emergency Automotive Technologies, at $38,018.80. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -77, APPROVING PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT 2014 -2015 —ADOPTED The Council acknowledged that the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project was an important undertaking to assure preparedness. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -77, Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement 2014 -2015. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.K. CHANGE ORDER — CONTRACT ENG 14 -4 BIRCHCREST B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS — APPROVED Engineer Millner stated staff recommended delaying this project from 2014 to 2015 and that. the contractor had confirmed he was able to keep prices from increasing; however, the contractor had not yet secured that same promise from all of the subcontractors. The Council discussed the terms of the project contract. Manager Neal stated the Council could revisit this in early 2015 to ensure that the prices have not increased from the original bid. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving Change Order ;delaying the project from 2014 to 2015 — Contract ENG 14 -4 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, contingent upon the original bid unit prices remaining the same for 2015. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.L. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -75 AUTHORIZING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION FOR PENTAGON PARK SOUTH —ADOPTED The Council reviewed the language of the resolution and expressed concern relating to the terms for grant repayment should the project not perform within five years. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf assured the Council that DEED had never required repayment of grants because, ultimately, the project achieved its objectives, despite the fact that occasionally it took longer than planned. He explained the terms of the grant agreement between the City and DEED, and the City and the developer. Attorney Knutson indicated that grant subrecipient agreements always included hold harmless language and he Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 1, 2014 would ensure it was included in this agreement as well. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -75 Authorizing Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Grant Application for Pentagon Park South. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF RICHARD STANEK — REPORT RECEIVED Hennepin County Sheriff Stanek updated the Council on Hennepin County Sheriff's Department enforcement and public service activities. He described training provided by Hennepin County for the City's public safety and first responders including the use of Narcan (heroine antidote) in the cases of overdoses to save lives. The Council thanked Sheriff Stanek for his work on behalf of Edina. Vl. COMMUNITY COMMENT Johan Rosenberg, 4511 Oak Drive, expressed concern with the Council's decisions relating to the repurposing of Fred Richards Golf Course that might have been based on an outdated 2006 parks survey. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, expressed concerns relating to the decision that allowed the owner of 5508 Dever Drive, to elevate the front entrance of a new house more than 4.5 feet (from the elevation of the existing split level house entrance) without first obtaining a Conditional Use Permit or a front yard setback variance. Vll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -73 AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL, LP PROJECT) SERIES 2014 —ADOPTED Finance Director Wallin explained this process for issuing conduit bonds was required by State Statute and reminded the Council that the issuance and repayment of these bonds (principle and interest) was solely the responsibility of the developer and not the City. It was noted the paperwork for this sale and issuance of conduit bonds was drafted for the benefit of the City by Dorsey & Whitney. Frank Hogan, Dougherty & Company, stated Yorktown Continental was going through the underwriting process for the project financing with an August closing anticipated. David Dye, Yorktown Continental Limited Partnership, stated the documentation had been reviewed. Mr. Wallin stated the City was only a conduit financer of this project and not be liable for the debt. The City's AAA bond rating and borrowing ability would not be affected. Mr. Wallin explained the City was charging a fee of one -half of 1% to allow Yorktown to use the conduit financing. The Council asked about tenant qualifications relative to income and whether or not a� the H.O.M.E. Program services were being utilized at Yorktown Continently. Mr. Hogan explained the income requirements and stated the project would not use a' H.O.M.E. Program services. Following a brief discussion, Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -73 Authorizing the Sale and Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Yorktown Continental, LP Project), Series 2014; Establishing the Security therefor and Authorizing the Execution of Documents. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT #13 -7PK, PAMELA PARK SHELTER BUILDING —AWARDED Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh stated bids were awarded for the Pamela Park site work and artificial turf on June 3, 2014. The current request for the Pamela Park Shelter with construction proposed to begin the week of July 21, 2014. The shelter should be ready for the 2014 -15 skating season. Ms. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 1, 2014 Kattreh described Pamela Park the proposed designs one a gable roof and one a shed roof. The base bid with a gable roof was $622,363, and the alternate for a shed roof design, including increased energy', efr —. � ficienc—y, was an additional $75,739, Two additional alternates were presented; 1) reclaiming and repaving the parking lot for $77,088; and, 2) fireplace for $29,123. Ms. Kattreh suggested the Council consider reclaiming and repaving of the parking lot, due to the present condition. Ms. Kattreh advised there was a $118,000 project contingency in case problems occurred during construction. The Council discussed the roof design options and related costs. Paul - Kolias, RJM Construction, 701 Washington Avenue North, Minneapolis, responded to questions relating to the two proposed designs and the various alternates. The Council discussed the merits of the various alternates and the two proposed designs. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, awarding the Contracts for the Pamela Park Shelter Building to the subcontractors recommended by RJM Attachment D, dated June 24, 2014 including Bid Alternate #4, shed roof design and west parking lot reclamation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Sprague Motion carried. VII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-76 ADOPTED –ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that, in order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -76 accepting various grants and donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. VIM CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION – HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION – LOCAL SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHT'S IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING. The Council acknowledged that the Commission was requesting action related to local support for human rights implementation and monitoring, and that the deadline for sign -on was July 3, 2014. It was noted that this recommendation had been vetted and approved by the U.S. Council of Mayors. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to authorize Mayor Hovland to sign a letter on behalf of the Council to the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor at the U.S. Department of State urging support of human rights organizations from the federal government and requesting the federal government to engage state and local government stake holders in strengthening and expanding mechanisms to monitor the implementation of human rights as well as to provide the adequate human and financial resources. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. MINUTES: 1. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, MAY 8, 2014 2. EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, MAY 6, 2014 3. VETERAN'S MEMORIAL COMMITTEE, APRIL 18, 2014 4. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, MAY 15, 2014 Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 1, 2014 S. ARTS AND CULTURE MEETING, APRIL 24, 2014 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE— Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XI.A. USE OF FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE Manager Neal provided an update on the repurposing of the Fred Richards Golf Course and the proposal to use it for an equine function. When previously discussed, the Council had identified two key goals: creating a more financially sustainable model; and, to repurpose the property to a use that would increase access for all Edina residents. The Council reviewed its past consideration and agreed that an equine use would not meet either of its two key goals. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, that an equine use, a private use, or a limited ;single scope use were not compatible with the Council's goals for repurposing the Fred Richards Golf Course property and directing staff to continue community engagement throughout the planning process. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:11 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 15, 2014. Video Copy of the July 1, 2014, meeting available. Page 5 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE CLOSED WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 1, 2014 5:06 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:06 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:23 p.m. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; and Roger Knutson, City Attorney. SESSION CLOSED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to move into closed session to discuss potential real estate acquisition 7401 Bush Lake Road at 5:071 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Sprague absent Motion carried. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf informed the Council on the status of the property at 7401 Bush Lake Road. The Council and staff discussed the level of interest, timing and potential use of the property. Council's consensus was to not pursue purchase. ADJOURNMENT Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Bennett to adjourn the closed session at SAS p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 15, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY I, 2014 5:45 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Annie Coyle, City Management Fellow; Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, City Engineer; Scott Neal, City Manager and Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the work session was to review the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Approval Process and Living Streets Implementation. PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY FUND APPROVAL PROCESS City Engineer Millner reviewed the creation of the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. He noted that staff was seeking guidance from the City Council about how to handle as oval of projects that have both a PACS financed sidewalk along with a neighborhood street reconstruction. Mr. Millner presented the Council with four options for consideration when the Council authorizes the construction of sidewalks using the PACS Fund to finance the construction. The Council discussed the various aspects of each option and its consensus was to consider the sidewalk projects at the time of the public hearing for the reconstruction project, but to have two separate votes, o en on the sidewalk and one on the street reconstr o LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION Members of the Living Streets Working Group in attendance included: Jennifer Janovy, Bill McCabe, Ellen Jones, Michael Platterer, Paul Nelson, Paul Thompson and Claudia Carr. Transportation Planner Nolan presented the two chapters from the draft Living Streets Plan: the "Network of Living Streets" which covers the different types of Living Streets and their location, and the "Design Guidelines," which discusses the different Living Streets elements and how they would be applied (including Sidewalk Maps). The Living Street's Plan classified street not only based on function, but also on the character of the street and its adjacent land uses. The Plan includes a new street category called "local connector streets ". Local connector streets would be high - traveled connections between neighborhood, destinations, and higher level streets. They tend to be frequent bike /walk corridors. The Plan, which provides a basic design framework for each street type, will help with the implementation of a multi - modal, sustainable network. The City Council, Living Streets Working Group and staff discussed the Plan's proposed function and implementation and public input. A public meeting will be held later in the year to get public feedback on the plan. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 15, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 58 7/312014 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 429.65 345990 43565800 5862.5512 73.10 345987 43565900 5862.5515 73.10 346206 43566000 5842.5515 291.10 346214 43577900 5862.5513 170.00 346054 43588400 5822.5512 111.00 346215 43591800 5862.5512 505.75 346210 43666800 5842.5513 73.10 346208 43666900 5842.5515 112.50 346209 43667000 5842.5515 247.05 346216 43667200 5862.5512 126.76 346213 43667400 5822.5512 36.55 346212 43667500 5822.5515 32.76- 346443 43678400 5842.5513 430.00 346442 43690000 5822.5513 380.35 345992 6442700 -5862.5515 502.83 346440 6446000 5862.5515 60.00 345991 90344600 5860.6406 321.56 345968 90377100 5862.5515 27.12 345989 90377200 5860.6406 116.98 346205 90377300 5842.5515 153.50 346207 90413600 5842.5515 83.50 346439 90413700 5862.5515 58.26 346441 90413800 5822.6406 153.78 346211 90413900 5822.5515 4,504.78 59 7/3/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 72.07 LAMINATING ROLLS 346170 WO- 942174 -1 5110.6513 57.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 345918 WO- 942236 -1 1170.6406 101.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 345918 WO- 942238 -1 1550.6406 57.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 346149 WO- 942605 -1 1550.6406 288.97 60 7/3/2014 104020 DALCO 240.65 WYPALL, TISSUE 00001454 346063 2759663 1552.6406 240.65 61 7/3/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 421.42 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS - 345960 963621 -01 1642.6406 421.42 I Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERALSUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES r GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 1 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION HUMAN RESOURCES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 61 7/3/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. Continued... 62 702014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 149.50 TIRES 00005320 345967 210121843 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 71.90 TIRES 00005320 346119 210122285 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 186.10- RETURN 346121 210122811 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 394.00 TIRES 00005320 346120 210122956 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 429.30 63 7/3/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY ! 816.34 SOAP, LINERS, TISSUE 00008091 346091 7068 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 561.29 TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS 00002176 346395 7096 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,377.63 64 7/3/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 52.96 CONCESSION PRODUCT 346098 39790161 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 26.01 CONCESSION PRODUCT 346417 39824033 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 19.20 346418 39826431 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 141.19 346420 39826432 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 496.44 346419 39847642 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 735.80 384205 7/3/2014 126153 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 1,235.00 SPORTS DOME /ICE RINK 346166 34046 -1 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,235.00 384206 713/2014 126198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 148.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346311 062714 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 148.96 384207 7/3/2014 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 29.32 HOSE REPAIR 00001327 346052 1- 859256 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS 29.32 384208 7/3/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY e 62.00 345985 1798650 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 102.00 345983 1798652 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 112.80 345984 1799153 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 82.80 346436 1800734 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 80.80 346435 1801239 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 90.00 346437 180618 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page- 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SEI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 713/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # . Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384208 7/3/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY Continued... 530.40 384209 7/3/2014 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 286.00 CONSOLES REPAIR 00001119 345916 37505 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 286.00 364210 7/3/2014 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 87.57 SHOVELS 346312 31462788 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 165.19 CO2 346313 31467217 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 168.09 CO2 346314 31475111 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 420.85 384211 7/3/2014 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 180.00 BIKE BLVD DESIGN 346316 55073 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 900.00 EVALUATION STUDY 346317 55076 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 1,080.00 384212 7/3/2014 106991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 119.42 COFFEE 346315 34705 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 119.42 384213 7/3/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 163.79 CONCESSION PRODUCT 346318 406079060 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,558.67 346319 406090196 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 916.98 346320 406130587 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 288.19 CONCESSION PRODUCT 346325 406170115 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 973.19 346321 406180137 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,771.69 FOOD 345917 406200535 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 156.92 CONCESSION PRODUCT 346324 406200568 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 399.39 CLEANING SUPPLIES 346324 406200588 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,783.48 346322 406230158 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 511.17 346323 406250205 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 260.05 346326 406250206 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 8,783.72 384214 7/312014 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 575.75 KIDDY POOL AUTOFILL REPAIR 346327 42290 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 575.75 384216 7/3/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384215 7/312014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS Continued... 64.60 COFFEE 346328 9973928 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 64.60 384216 7/312014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 415.95 345986 55158 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 904.00 346150 55962 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,240.50 346203 55963 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 685.00 346204 55964 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 30.80 346438 55965 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,276.25 384217 7/3/2014 124499 BACH, MARCIA 60.00 USTA TRAINING COORDINATOR 346053 062414 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 60.00 384218 713/2014 100638 BACHMAN'S 37.92 PLANTS 346135 102888 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 37.92 384219 7/312014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 2,470.50 STORMWATER MGMT 346329 23270354.00 -207 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 2,470.50 384220 7/312014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 55.93 BATTERIES 346330 018- 340067 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 143.76 BATTERIES 346169 018 - 341086 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 199.69 384221 713/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 576.00 PIZZA 346331 D28IN2240 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 288.00 - PIZZA 346333 D28IN2247 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 420.00 PIZZA 346332 D28IN2285 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,284.00 384222 7/3/2014 126139 BERNICK'S 669.40 346217 143886 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 669.40 384223 7/312014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 230.90 COFFEE 346055 1179140 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CON" -,IONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384223 7/3/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 230.90 384224 7/3/2014 122699 BIOLAWN 2,055.43 BLVD WEED CONTROL 346334 72970 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 3,500.00 PARK WEED CONTROL 346335 72971 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 298.00 GRUB CONTROL 346056 74181 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 2,861.00 GRUB CONTROL 346136 74384 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE - 8,714.43 384226 7/3/2014 134447 BLOZIS, KATIE 95.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM CANCELED 346129 REFUND 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 95.00 384226 713/2014 102646 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 21,890.50 JULY 2014 PREMIUMS 346336 LOGOAl -7/14 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 182,268.50 JULY 2014 PREMIUMS 346336 LOGOAl -7/14 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 204,159.00 384227 713/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 7,160.50 WATER TREATMENT RENOVATIONS 345919 0167014 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 7,160.50 384228 7/3/2014 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 1,971.66 BRAKE SHOES 00005383 346337 861787 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 86.06 HUB CAP 00005409 345920 664012 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.90 OIL BATH 00005412 345921 864419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.16 U- JOINT, UNIVERSAL 00005471 346101 865291 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,170.96 364229 7/312014 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 55.00 SANDWICHES FOR ARENA 346336 02376 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA ADMINISTRATION 55.00 384230 7/3/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,291.75 MATERIALS TESTING 346340 B001198 01417.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION HAZELTON RD.IMPROVEMENTS 474.30 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 346339 B001738 01252.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -252 EDINA REALTY.BLDG DEMO 1,766.05 384231 71312014 122074 BUIE, BARB 16.80 PETTY CASH 346481 063014 5760.6235 POSTAGE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384231 7/3/2014 122074 BUIE, BARB Continued... 63.48 PETTY CASH 346481 063014 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 82.57 PETTY CASH 346481 063014 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ` 162.85 384232 7/3/2014 134443 BURNSTEIN, LAWRENCE 91.16 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346057 062414 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 91.16 384233 7/3/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,062.25 345994 349798 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER '` 50TH ST SELLING 34.30 345993 354077 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ 50TH ST SELLING 969.90 346218 354223 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,524.95 346151 354224 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,591.40 384234 7/312014 100678 CARLSON PRINT_ ING CO. 257.00 MOVIE POSTCARDS 346171 00100964 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE _ 257.00 384235 7/3/2014 128923 CAWLEY 621.40 BGC NAME BADGES 346102 V228731 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 33.08 NAME BADGES 346137 V229822 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 654.48 384236 7/3/2014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 385.05 SQUAD PRINTERS 346058 ML92793 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 770.13 SQUAD PRINTERS 00004329 346103 MN58710 .1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,155.18 384237 713/2014 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 32.78 10089900 -4 346174 10089900 -6/14 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 544.61 5546504 -1 346172 5546504 -6/14 1470.6166 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 295.66 5563827 -4 345922 5563827 -6/14 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 347.06 5584304 -9 346344 5584304 -6/14 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.49 5584310 -6 346343 5584310 -6/14 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 52.03 5590919 -6 346342 5590919 -6/14 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 2,084.29 5591458 -4 346173 5591458 -6/14 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 26.52 5596524 -8 346341 5596524 -6/14 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 277.59 8034001 -1 345923 8034001 -6/14 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 572.21 9724639 -1 345924 9724639 -6/14 5511.6186 HEAT. ARENA BLDG INDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 669.12 CITY OF EDINA 384241 7/3/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA -UTILITIES Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346347 113317143 -6/14 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384237 7/3/2014 345929 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 5422.6189 Continued... 97.66 4,248.26 345928 155250018 -6/14 5422.6189 384238 713/2014 232.89 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 346060 170005201 -6/14 1470.6189 1,992.04 346176 2858362 5720.6186 HEAT 345927 173001000 -6/14 1,270.19 SEWER & WATER 346175 2858702 5311.6186 HEAT 00110793 - 0173001001 345926 3,262.23 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER 384239 7/3/2014 57 123898 CENTURYLINK 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 7 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POOL OPERATION 00 952 920.1566 346346 1586 -6/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 66.87 952 922 -2444 346345 2444 -6/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 123.87 384240 7/3/2014 100683 CHEMSEARCH 669.12 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 346059 1534414 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS, FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RANGE GOLF DOME PROGRAM VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION 669.12 384241 7/3/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA -UTILITIES 1,695.31 00077479- 0113317143 346347 113317143 -6/14 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER 3,713.53 00110793- 0155200000 345925 155200000 - 6/14 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 52.86 00110793- 0155250009 345929 155250009 -6114 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 97.66 00110793- 0155250018 345928 155250018 -6/14 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 232.89 00113607 - 0170005201 346060 170005201 -6/14 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER 52.86 00110793 - 0173001000 345927 173001000 -6/14 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER 91.16 00110793 - 0173001001 345926 173001001 -6/14 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER 5,936.27 384242 7/3/2014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 178.24 346219 0118021517 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 178.24 384243 7/3/2014 120433 COMCAST 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 346138 373022 -6114 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80.11 8772 10 614 0419858 346061 419858 -6/14 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 86.88 384244 7/3/2014 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 5,588.99 HOT MIX 346348 061514 5913.6516 BLACKTOP 5,588.99 384246 7/312014 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS, FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RANGE GOLF DOME PROGRAM VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384246 7/3/2014 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. Continued... 58.28 KILN PARTS 346062 INV000089212 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 58.28 384246 7/3/2014 101916 COUNTRY FLAGS 233.00 FLAGS 346352 6646 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 233.00 384247 7/312014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 280.02 CHILI COOKOFF APRONS 346177 25382 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1,172.57 UNIFORMS 346178 28979 5761.6201 LAUNDRY. 1,279.02 UNIFORM SHIRTS 346424 29581 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 3,633.50 UNIFORM JACKETS 346350 29583 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 35.37 HAND STAMPS' - INK PADS 346349 29881 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,400.48 384248 7/3/2014 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 108.00 MAY 2014 WASHES 346351 410778 1553.6238 CAR WASH 108.00 384249 7/312014 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 121,412.50 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 346179 41098• 5550.1705.. CONSTR. IN PROGRESS . 1,021.87 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 346180, 41089 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ' 122,434.37 384260 7/3/2014 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 179.81. RIM, TIRE, VALVE 00005437 346353 163407 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 293.67 WHEEL, TIRE, VALVE 00005437 346354 163408 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 473.48 384261 7/3/2014 134448 DANTHULURI, DURGA 18.00 PARK & REC PROGRAM SWITCH 346130 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM 18.00 384262 7/3/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 458.60 345995 756723 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,196.90 346222 757795 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 931.60 346221 757796 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 68.40 346220 757797 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,261.65 346152 757798 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 97.20 346153 757799 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 8 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELL' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384262 7/3/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Continued... 8,014.35 384263 7/3/2014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 3,164.55 JULY 2014 PREMIUM 346355 061014 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,164.55 384264 7/3/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. — 21.82 GLOVES 00005433 345930 912583 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.71 JACK STANDS 00001322 346064 913140 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.53 384256 713/2014 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 73.09 BAKERY 345931 510817 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 74.82 345932 510820 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 147.91 384256 7/3/2014 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 8,238.10 MAY 2014 SURCHARGE 346065 200370.53060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 8,238.10 384257 7/3/2014 121161 DEX MEDIA 21.40 PHONE LISTING 346067 061614 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.40 PHONE LISTING 346067 061614 5841.6168 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 21.40 PHONE LISTING 346067 061614 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 64.20 384258 7/3/2014. 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 26.50 650487671 346066 650487671 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 26.50 384269 7/312014 101986 DIBBLE, DON 77.80 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346139 062414 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 77.80 384260 7/3/2014 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2;500.00 ED123866 REFUND 346140 6605 PARKWOOD 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS RD 2,500.00 384261 7/3/2014 129079 DRAIN KING INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384261 7/312014 129079 DRAIN KING INC. Continued... 655.00 CLEAR /RESET URINAL DRAINS 346356 91795 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL& ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ADVERTISING OTHER - MUSIC IN EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 655.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 384262 7/3/2014 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 3,234.44 FA2 346357 85967 1314.6517 2,150.28 FA2 346358 86019 1314.6517 11,778.80 FA2 346359 86071 1314.6517 8,584.40 FA2 346360 86121 1314.6517 8,587.48 FA2 346361 86174 1314.6517 34,335.40 384263 .7/3/2014 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 520.00. SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 346131 062614 1621.6103 520.00 384264 7/312014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 320.00 MUSIC IN EDINAAD 346181 112260 2611.6122 320.00 EDINA NEW PHONE APP AD 346141 114366 1130.6122 640.00 384265 7/3/2014 134464 EDELSTEIN, ROBERT 34.59 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346182 5305 64TH ST W 5900.2015 34.59 384266 71312014 122792 EMERGENCY.AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 395.90 SQUAD EQUIPMENT' 346183 RS4104 1400.6215 395.90 384267 °7/3/2014 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 67.00 346223 259 -1272 5862.5515 33.50 345996 W- 979044 5862.5515 100.50 384268 7/312014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 79.20, . OIL 346104 1- 4470943 1553.6530 16.94 LENS CLEANING POLISH 346363 111472057 1553.6530 116.06 BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES 345933 69- 140023 1553.6530 78.03 PUMPASSEMBLY 346364 69- 141370 1553.6530 229.20 BRANDED FRICTION, ROTORS- 345935 69- 141685 1553.6530 20.71 MTC FL2016, FILTER 346362 69- 141704 1553.6530 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL& ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ADVERTISING OTHER - MUSIC IN EDINA ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT 9TION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 67.46 SHOES 346425 5668953 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 67.46 384276 7/3/2014 134414 FREIBERG, KAYE Council Check Register by GL 84.00 ART CLASS REFUND 346184 5286REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 384276 7/3/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 7/3/2014 - 71312014 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT ' Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384268 713/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 97.71 SWAY BAR 345934 69- 141792 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 22.44 SWAY BAR LINK KIT 345936 69- 142382 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 79.20 OIL 346105 69- 142791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 739.49 384269 7/3/2014 122649 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 721.71 FOOD 345937 3135449 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 721.71 384270 71312014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 173.61 METER DIAL 00001363 345938 0082297 -1 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,050.33 METER, T- SPONDERS 00001363 345939 0086030 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,223.94 384271 713/2014 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 249.00 RENEWAL- BOB WILSON 345940 0055850 -2014 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 249.00 384272 713/2014 113987 FISHER, PETER 16.02 ZIP TIES 346068 REIMBURSE 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 34.55 TRAINING SUPPLIES 346068 REIMBURSE 1470.6579 TRAININGAIDS 50.57 384273 7/3/2014 129600 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 120.00 346444 9240 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 120.00 384274 7/3/2014 101476 FOOTJOY 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 11 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE METER REPAIR METER REPAIR ASSESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING 67.46 SHOES 346425 5668953 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 67.46 384276 7/3/2014 134414 FREIBERG, KAYE 84.00 ART CLASS REFUND 346184 5286REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 84.00 384276 7/3/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 268.60 CAMCO 717 SC (5 GALLON PAILS) 00008085 346069 44925 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 268.60 384277 713/2014 101361 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/312014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384277 7/312014 101361. GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC Continued... 1,788.28 BOILER INSPECTION /REPAIR 346365 126486 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,788.28 _ 384278 7/3/2014 106932 GOPROMOS - 407.38 PENCILS 00005332 346366 3965726 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 407.38 384279 713/2014 101103 GRAINGER 60.72 346071 9454998122 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.72 346070 9455454042 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7.64 WIRE BRUSHES 00005327 345944 9460122428 5932.6556 TOOLS GENERAL STORM SEWER 60.72- 346072 9462265811 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 468.18 SOLENOID VALVES 00001267 345945 9464567578 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS ' WATER TREATMENT 482.15 OUTLET BOXES 00005249 345946 9466110872 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.72- 346073 9466110906 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING. MAINTENANCE 318.66 CIGARETTE RECEPTACLES 00005335 346107 9467178563 4090.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ' 17.25 SAFETY GLASSES 00005336 346108 9469111745 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 192.86 OUTLET BOXES 00005436 346109 9469441886 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.60 SAFETY GLASSES 00005337 346106 9469632054 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.83 PLASTIC FORKS 00005337 346106 9469632054 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,600.17 - 384280 7/3/2014 120201 GRANICUS INC. 4,674.60 WEBSTREAMING 346074 55866 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS " 4,674.60 384281 7/3/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 913.50 346224 168137 5862.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 911.25 345997 168138 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 911.25 346225 168529 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 74.25 346445 168636 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,810.25 384282 7/3/2014 121536 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC - 50.00 GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICES 325808 13201 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS s. 50.00 384283 7/312014 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 583.23 STARTUP LAWN IRRIGATION .00001362 345947 141955 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 583.23 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check. Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384283 713/2014 101350. GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. Continued... 384284 7/3/2014 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 125.00 GOLF CLINIC 345942 062314 5401.4601 DRIVING RANGE 128.72 UMBRELLA FOR DECK 345943 062414 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8,575.00 GROUP LESSONS 346367 062714 5401.4602 LESSONS 12,700.00 3RD QTRLY INSTALLMENT 345941 6/19/2013 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF 21,528.72 384286 7/3/2014 100788 H&L MESABI 8,274.22 PLOW BLADES 00005284 346110 91066 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8,274.22 384286 7/3/2014 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD 129.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346368 062514 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 129.99 384287 7/312014 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 213.22 THERMAL ROLLS 346369 126433 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 213.22 384288 7/312014 134465 HARRIS, MARYANN 75.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 346185 REFUND 1600A390.01 PLAYGROUND 75.00 384289 7/312014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 177.12 BEEF PATTIES .345948 025213 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 177.12 384290 7/3/2014 129790 HELBING, ERIN 86.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 281388 020612. 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 86.00 384291 7/3/2014 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 763.20 RADIO FLEET FEE 346370 1000046359 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 763.20 384292 713/2014 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 2,264.39 PCS 00004324 346426 54432278 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,264.39 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page- 13 Business Unit GOLF REVENUES GRILL GOLF REVENUES GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GRILL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384293 7/3/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 919.00 345998 707859 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING . 459.00 345999 706847 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,789.00 346229 709058 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING - 84.00 346228 709059 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,847.00 346227 709060 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,503.70 346226 709451 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING - 8,601.70 384294 7/312014 131632 HOOK, TRAVIS 196.00 DOUBLE PAID FOR SPRING CLASS 307163 REFUND 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 196.00 384295 713/2014. 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 3,534.76 MAIL WATER BILLS 346186 91130 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 577.27 MAIL LATE NOTICES 346187 91166 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 4,112.03 384296 7/3/2014 101146• IMPACT TELECOM 391.31 345949 608262143 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN -MIS 391.31 384297 71312014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 234.00 346001 20431 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 345.00 346000 20505 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,245.00 346230 20620 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 276.00 346447 20644 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 245.00 346446 20645 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING " 2,345.00 384298 7/3/2014 106062 INNOVATIVE GRAPHICS 864.00 T- SHIRTS 346188 39284 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP PARKADMIN. GENERAL 864.00 384299 7/3/2014 104696 INrL SECURITY PRODUCTS 94.23 SIGN POSTS 00001304 345950 3042649 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 94.23 384300 7/312014 131806 IRSA VIDEO 390.00 MIC TRANSMITTER BATTERIES 00001116 346189 1148 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 390.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384300 7/312014 131806 IRSA VIDEO Continued... 384301 7/3/2014 134444 JACK HARNESS CONSTRUCTION 20.80 PERMIT REFUND 346075 ED131600 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 20.80 384302 713/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 1,300.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 346371 JJ5465 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,300.00 384303 71312014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 87.00 345951 2218084 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 9,751.69 346003 2225508 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,066.44 346002 2225510 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,676.73 346482 2225538 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 134.80 346233. 2225539 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,442.09 346450 2225540 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.72- 346234 2225545 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER _ YORK SELLING 11,300.25 346232 2225546 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 119.05 346231 2225547 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 449.40 346448 2225567 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 37,987.73 '. 384304: 71312014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 41.58 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001309 346076 68574163 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 196.62 WEED SPRAYERS 00001320 346078 68602521 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 9.72- RETURN 346077 68608180 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 223.97 WEED CONTROL CHEMICALS 00005338 345952 68661351 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 452.45 384307 7/3/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 201.12 346011 1872881 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 354.73 346012 1872883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 904.68 346013 1872890 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 637.17 346010 1872893 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING •75 346009 1872896 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.24 346008 1872898 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,175.75 346005 1878592 5822.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,312.26 346014 1878593 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS, SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,696.32 346006 1878594 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD-WINE 50TH ST SELLING 25.12 346016 1878595 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384307 7/3/2014 106836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. p Continued... 1,522.22 346017 1878602 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 195.25 346007 1878603 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 598.41 346015 1878604 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 123.00 346004 1878618 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,333.19 346246 1884154 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .84 346235 1884155 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,419.42 346452 1884157 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.36 346239 1884158 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 419.16 346451 1884159 5822.5513 `COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 831.87 346248 1884160 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .19 346256 1884161 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,168.88 346454 1884162 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 453.34 346259 1884163 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 25.12 346258 1884164 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,565.92 346236 1884165 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.99 346237 1884166 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 620.09 346240. 1884167 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 58.24 346241 1884168- 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 84.98 346247 1884170 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,354.10 346252 1884175 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,742.19 346251 1884176 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,537.63 346253 1884177 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR -_YORK SELLING 393.36 346257 1884178 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,268.00 346250 1884179 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 123.00 346249 1884180 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,450.28 346255 1884181 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 129.48 346254 1884183 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLDWIX YORK SELLING 5,541.68 346238 1884185 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,993.80 346245 1884186 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,040.59 346244 1884187 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,163.04 346242 1884188 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,212.32 346243 1884189 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 187.12 346453 1886034 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 48.00- 346020 615521 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 200.50- 346262 615523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 54.42- 346018 620494 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 37.12- 346019 621381 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.24- 346455 622994 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 47.45- 346260 622998 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 713/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384307 7/3/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 4.22- 346261 622999 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 51,497.25 384308 7/3/2014 130789 KATZ, DAVID 285.00 HOMETOWN HEROES ARTICLES 346079 166 -6/14 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 285.00 384309 7/3/2014 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 191.82 INSTALL LOCKS 346080 S1010689 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 10.84 KEYS 346372 51010742 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 202.66 384310 7/3/2014 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 4,770.00 ANNUAL RAMP INSPECTION 345953 5562147 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 4,770.00 384311 713/2014 134419 KING, LARRY 149.87 FLOWER BOX MATERIALS 345954 062314 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 149.87 384312 7/312014 129942 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 325.36 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346081 061914 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 325.36 384313 7/3/2014 134446 KRIEGER, RYAN 98.00 SUMMER CLASSES REFUND 346082 BRAEMAR ARENA 5501.4607 CLASS,REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 98.00 384314 7/312014 121707 KUZNIA, AARON 70.00 MEETING REFRESHMENTS 346373 062614 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 70.00 384316 7/3/2014 133189 LANDMARK BUILDING CONTRACTORS 2,500.00 ED129124 REFUND 346083 5705YORKAVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 384316 7/3/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 506.17 WASHERS, BULBS, SCREWS 00005403 346111 9302524702 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.49 SOCKETS 00005431 346112 9302529390. 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 454.39 FITTINGS, WASHERS 00005415 346375 9302539219 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check'Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384316 7/3/2014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC: Continued... 145.10 TY-RAP 00005415 346374 9302539220 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,150.15 384317 7/3/2014 130014 LIGHTING HOUSE USA INC. 330.00 FIX RELAY SWITCH 346427 -20193 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 330.00 384318 7/3/2014 100868 LOGIS 420.75 IT CONSULTING 346376 38536 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 990.00 2 FACTOR & ENCRPT SERVICE 346376 38536 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 668.25 WIFI PROJECT- GOLF COURSE 346376 38536 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 2,079.00 384319 7/3/2014 112677 M.'AMUNDSON LLP 1,719.27 346456 176767 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,719.27 364320 713/2014 114593 MAAP 85.00 MAPP WORKSHOP - MITZI WICKLUND 346142 AUG 21 & 22 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 85.00 384321 7/312014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 30.52 HUB CAP 00005387 346113 2144377 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,000.91 CLUTCH PAKASSEMBLY 00005468 , 346377 2144398 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.93 12 VOLT COIL 00005472 ` 346114 2144508 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.49 HUB CAP 00005441 346115 2144512 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,154.85 384322 7/312014 134396 MAHAJAN, ISHA 98.00 SUMMER CLASSES REFUND 346084 BRAEMAR ARENA 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 98.00 384323 7/3/2014 134401 MAHLUM, KATIE 75.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 346190 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 75.00 384324 713/2014 131118 MANION, CHARLES JOHN - 442.00 TOURNAMENT CONCESSIONS 346132 062414 4075.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES VANVALKENBURG 442.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 711/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384326 7/3/2014 110795 MASON- CUTTERS Continued... 525.00 SAW CUT ROADWAY 00001370 346378 29842 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 525.00 384326 7/3/2014 113023 MEGGITT TRAINING SYSTEMS INC. 14,738.06 SHOOTING RANGE EQUIPMENT 346379 INV- 0062899 7412.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF RANGE 14,738.06 384327 7/3/2014 101483 MENARDS 164.83 LUMBER, SUPPLIES 00001318 346085 59519 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 623.12 ELECTRICAL CORDS, WORKLIGHTS00001326 346087 59620 1322.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 122.27 LUMBER 00001330 346086 59710 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.97 HEAT SHRINK, LIQUID TAPE 00001345 346380 60243 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 931.19 384328 7/3/2014 132441 METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD 1,666.50 EDINA 911 INSTALLMENT 346381 20009678 -1 2310.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES E911 1,666.50 384329 7/3/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 25.86 PLATE 00005470 346382 489549 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.28 MIRROR 00005440 346363 489569 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION,GEN 75.14 384330 7/3/2014 134420 MILLER, JOHN 120A3 BILLIARD SUPPLIES 345955 061714 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 120.43 384331, 7/3/2014 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 150.00 TRENCH I & II EXAM 346428 2712 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.06 - 384332 7/3/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 795.00 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 345956 34713 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,120.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 00001365 345957 34721 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,325.00 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001368 346384 ' 34724 5913.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,240.00 384333 7/3/2014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 10.69 WINDOW WASHING 345958 928023609 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 10.69 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 364333 7/3/2014 127062. MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. Continued... 384334 7/312014 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 11.0.1 V -BELTS 00001225 345959 1383028 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.01 384336 7/312014 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 HOSPITALITY FEE - CENT LAKES 346088 50026 -2014 5760.6105 - DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 35.00 384336 713/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 567.90 HOSE, FITTINGS, TUBES 00005408 346385 0105327 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 567.90 364337 7/3/2014 102396 MDSE, WILLIAM - 442.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 346133 062614 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES 442.00 ' 384338 713/2014 100916 MUZAK LLC 265.17 MUSIC SERVICES 346089 50844236 5622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 265.17 MUSIC SERVICES 346089 50844236 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 265.17 MUSIC SERVICES 346089 50844236 5862:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 795.51. 384339 7/3/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 547.50 346263 91471 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 547.50 364340 7/3/2014 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC. 90,471.45 SPORTS DOME /ICE RINK 346167 1 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS `. 90,471.45 384341 7/3/2014 134460 NICHOL, EMILY 33.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 346386 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM 33.00 384342 7/312014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 393.02 STEEL TUBE, STRIPS 00005405 346116 291161 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.00 STEEL 00005413 346387 291519 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 507.02 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 20 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET PARKADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No', Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384343 7/3/2014 100927 NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC Continued... 163.70 TEST KIT SUPPLIES 346388 4214 5311.6545 CHEMICALS 163.70 384344 713/2014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 269.60 LIGHTS 00005352 346389 36176 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 269.60 384346 7/3/2014 102662 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 266.00 HAND SOAP 345961 5654436 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 206.00 384346 7/3/2014 133280 O'GARA, LAURIE 200.00 AD COMMISSION 346143 0007 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.00 384347 7/3/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 15.31 CHAIN 00005385 345962 540223 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.75 BOLT 346117 540345 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 86.80 SLINGS 00005417 346390 540757 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 125.10 SLINGS 00005417 346391 540763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 253.96 384348 7/3/2014 134466 OMLIE, JAMES JOSEPH 50.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 346191 INTERN 2611.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 384349 7/312014 129470 PALMER PRINTING 860.00 GOLF SCORECARDS 00002063 346192 141684 -01 5760.6575 PRINTING 860.00 384360 7/3/2014 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 21 Business Unit POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MUSIC IN EDINA CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 558.00 346021 14066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 558.00 384361 7/3/2014 133335 PASSAGES CUSTOM HOMES 2,500.00 ED130968 REFUND 346090 :6204 HILLSIDE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS RD 384362 7/3/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384352 7/3/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 132.50 346022 8453709 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,364.95 346265 8454394 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.25 346266 8454407 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,185.80 346457 8454409 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,97829 346264 8454411 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 78.25- 346458 8454733 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,619.54 384363 7/3/2014 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 977.50 IT CONSULTING 346392 62414002 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 977.50 384354 7/3/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 846.38 345964 00402244 5761.5510 - COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 225.24 345963 00402279 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 422.16 346393 00402293 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 394.60 346023 01285505 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD -MIX VERNON SELLING 673.27 345965 19506768 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS'SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING - 2,561.65 - 384366 7/3/2014 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 3,750.00 MAINTENANCE AT CITY HALL 345966 052814 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 3,750.00 384366 7/3/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 333.55 346026 2619029 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 142.66 346025 2619032 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ., 50TH ST SELLING 790.58 346024 2622773 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING . 154.24 346028 2622774 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 937.12 346027 2622775 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 57.12 346461 2626416 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 113.79 346275 2626417. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 109.68 346271 2626418 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 351.13 346272 2626419 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 645.04 346460 2626420 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,141.21 346268 2626422 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS,SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 346270 2626423 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 650.58 346267 2626424 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,319.42 346269 2626425 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 1,449.73 346274 2626426 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SEI =- R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 7/312014 — 713/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384366 713/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 1,213.66 346276 2626427 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,683.41 346273 2626428 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.62 346277 2626430 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 197.34 346459 2627572 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.57- 346029 3525813 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 11,404.43 384367 7/3/2014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 333.20 346462 21488 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 371.20 346278 24189 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 704.40 384368 7/3/2014 130174 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1,180.00 FIELD PAINT 00001321 346118 INV516390 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,180.00 384369 7/3/2014 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,376.75 PLANT MAINTENANCE 346394 324133 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,376.75 384360 713/2014 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 44.00 345968 520961 -05 -14 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 44.00 384361 7/3/2014 124637 RALPH, ROBERT 988.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 346134 062614 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 988.00 384362 7/312014 104642 RCM'SPECIALTIES INC. 605.43 CRS2 346396 4282 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 605.43 384363 7/3/2014 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 345969 2680000000982 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 150.00 384364 7/3/2014 131069 REFINED REMODELING INC. 2,500.00 ED121991 REFUND 346144 5501 BEARD CT 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384366 7/3/2014 102408_ RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED- Continued... 32.97 JACK 00005388 346122 1927541747 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.97 384366 713/2014 129662 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 15.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 333112 010314 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15.00 384367 7/3/2014 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 109.90 346092 IND002029 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 109.90 384368 71312014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 164.44 ENVELOPES 346397 81843 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 164.44 384369 7/3/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 633.80 SOFTENER SALT 346093 00300682 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 633.80 384370 7/3/2014 124642 RUBIN, LAURA 75.00 PLAYGROUND. PROGRAM REFUND ':346193 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 75.00 384371 7/312014 100986 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO INC 436.28 SERRATED BLADES, DEPTH GAUGES 346398 C66550 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 436.28 384372 7/312014 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 2,095.00 •. SOILAPPLICATION - LEWIS PK 346123 907951543 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 2,095.00 384373 713/2014 133643 SAHARA, RICHARD 1,150.00 APPLICATION FEES REFUND 346194 REFUND 1140.4361 PLANNING FEES PLANNING 1,150.00 384374 7/3/2014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 92.45 SR CENTER SUPPLIES 346145 ACCT #9350 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 92.45 384376 713/7' 100990 SCHARBER & SONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # :: - Doc No; Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384376 7/312014 100990 SCHARBER & SONS Continued... 25.02 BOLTS 00005411 - 34.5970 P49565 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 25.02 384376 7/312014 103479 - SCHULTZ, RYAN 1,127.20 REIMBURSE AIRFARE 319769 071713 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,127.20 384377 7/312014 132294 SCIENCE EXPLORERS INC. 140.00 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 346399 3075 1624.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 140.00 384378 7/3/2014 100996 SEH 1,529.48 BRAEMAR GC WETLANDS 346195 281969 2410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,384.97 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 346401 282131' 01394.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 920.79 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 346401 '282131 05530.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,320.46 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 346401 282131 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 368.06 NORMANDALE STREET RECONS 346401 282131 04390.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION . 120.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 346400 282347 01410.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,348.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES 346400 282347 08060.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 233.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 346400 262347 05502.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 208.66 ANTENNA PROJECTS 345971 262659 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 7,434.58 384379 7/3/2014 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 499.50 JUNE FSA &HRA 346402 008816 -6/14 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 499.50 384380 7/3/2014 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 80.40 OFFICE SIGN 346196 44647REVISED 1554.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 80.40 384381 7/3/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 16.78 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 346403 062714 5110.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 41.16 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 346403 062714 5111.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 57.94 384382 7/3/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 104.64 LIVINGS STREETS POSTERS 346404 7882 01391.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 104.64 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 25 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND NORMANDALE NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON NORMANDALE RECON " CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING WM -502 RAW WATER WELL15 TO WTP GENERAL FUND REVENUES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT LIVING STREETS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 - Check # Date Amount : Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384383 7/3/2014 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. Continued... 88.65 TIME CARDS 346094 13065638 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 88.65 384384 7/3/2014 106739 SNAZA, DAVID 62.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346146 062414 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.99 384386 7/3/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,520.00 346285 1167145 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 617.46 346031 1172468 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,438.50 346032 1173847 5822.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,006.75 346463 1174884 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,968.55 346281 1174885 5822.5512. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 76.35 346279 1174886 5842.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,292.07 346283 1174887 5842.5512 -, COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING - 40.62 346284 1174888 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX- YORK SELLING 2,998.00 346280 1174889 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,686.40 346155 1174890 5862.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,123.94 346282 1174891 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120.50 346154 1174892 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26,889.14 384386 7/312014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 3,056.36 SPRING SALE CATALOGS 346095 EDINA LIQUOR 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 3,056.37 SPRING SALE CATALOGS 346095 EDINA LIQUOR 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 3,056.37 SPRING SALE CATALOGS 346095 EDINA LIQUOR 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 9,169.10 384387 7/3/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 346033 3308 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 239.25 346286 3336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 365.25 384388 7/312014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 74.93 PAINT 345972 062314 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 74.93 384389 7/312014 101016 STREICHERS 1,123.54 AMMO 346197 11093640 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 81.94 MACE 346200 11095214 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEP- =RAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by.lnvoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384389 7/3/2014 101016 STREICHERS Continued... 44.99 HOLSTER 346198 11095502 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 730.86 AMMO 346199 11096184 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,981.33 384390 7/3/2014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 53.50 TIRE DISPOSAL FEE 345973 10126214 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 351.96 TIRES 00005414 345974 10126230 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.75 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005339 346405 10126268 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 481.48 TIRES 00005475 346406 10126334 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 933.69 384391 7/312014 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 713.14 ANNUAL INSPECTIONS 345975 48855 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 713.14 384392 7/3/2014 101766 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 1,167.06 SPORTS DOME /ICE RINK 346168 45994 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET . 1,167.06 384393 7/3/2014 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 500.00 MOVIE RENTAL 346201 DB1936736 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE - 739.00 MOVIE RENTAL 346202 RG1937424 5760.6136 PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKESADMIN EXPENSE 1,239.00 384394 7/3/2014 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 345976 490180 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 40.00 384396 7/312014 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN 134.70 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346407 062414 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 134.70 384396 7/3/2014 104932 TAYLOR MADE 354.90 MERCHANDISE 346430 22310210 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 225.30 MERCHANDISE 346429 22353313 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 367.00- CREDIT 346431 22516059 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 213.20 384397 7/312014 129120 TC RUNNING COMPANY 630.00 UNIFORM SHORTS 346408 3198 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014`-. 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 — 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384397 7/3/2014 129120 TC RUNNING COMPANY Continued... 630.00 384398 713/2014 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC. 1;625.00 REPLACE HANDICAP DOOR MOTOR 346124 21993 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,625.00 384399 7/3/2014 131869 TEKIELA, KATHERINE 40.00 CANCELED CLASS 313618 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 40.00 384400 713/2014 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 334.29 MACHINE REPAIRS 00005432 346125 912.416754 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 334.29 384401 7/3/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,662.90 346034 829786 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 71.20 346287 831246 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,992.32 346156 831247 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,726.42 384402 7/3/2014 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 970.00 OUTREACH PROGRAM 346409 37806 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND 8 THEATER 970.00 384403 713/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 132.40 LATCHING RELAY 346410 3698465 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 43.86 FILTERS 00005410 345977 4013126 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 176.26 384404 713/2014 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 1,070.26 BRIDGE REPAIR 346411 002014001427 10096.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR8 78TH STREET BRIDGE REHAB _ - 1,070.26 BRIDGE REPAIR 346411 002014001427 10099.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR9 GUS YOUNG BRIDGE REHAB 2,140.52 384406 7/312014 129246 TOBROXEN, JENNY 23.40 MILEAGE. REIMBURSEMENT 346412 062114 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 23.40 384406 7/3/2014 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING 9,479.00 PAINT PLAY- STRUCTURE 346413 061614 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERF R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014' - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384406 7/3/2014 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING Continued... 980.00 PAINT SHIP, GUARD CHAIRS 346414 2014 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERATION 10,459.00 384407 713/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 69.00 SMITH TORCH 346127 10028889 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 444.37 WELDING GAS 346126 10030236 1553.6560 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 513.37 384408 7/3/2014 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 896.82 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 346432 51591 5860.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 896.83 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 346432 51591 5820.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 50TH STREET GENERAL 896.83 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 346432 51591 5840.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,690.48 384409 7/3/2014 134463 TRANSAMERICA 99.16 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346433 CHARLOTTE KATZ 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 99.16 384410 71312014 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC. 2,075.00 TAMPER 346415 120341427 -001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,075.00 384411 7/3/2014 134449 US BANK NA TRUSTEE 55.34 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346147 5960 ARBOUR AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 55.34 384412 7/3/2014 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,476.62 GATE VALVE REPLACEMENT 00001366 346128 20242 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 5,476.62 384413 713/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 458.88 LIQUOR BAGS 346148 310327 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 503.43 LIQUOR BAGS 345979 314315 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 78.79 CAN LINERS, UTENSILS 346416 314316 -00 5662.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 586.53 LIQUOR BAGS 346416 314316 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 21.67- CREDIT 345980 314383 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,069.00 CUPS 345978 314862 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 94.82 CAN LINERS 346096 314975 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,769.78 R55CKR2 •LOGIS101 346036 0098881 -IN CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 429.24 346036 Council Check Register by GL 5822.5512 'COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 199.50 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 0100086 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 346289 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Aixount Description 384414 7/3/2014 0101567 -IN 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE" Continued... 402.50 16.83 PVC 00001314 346097 8377135 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 219.20 CORD ENDS 00001314 346097 8377135 1400.6215- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 236.03 384416 7/312014 102218. VINTAGE ONE WINES INC.° MODEL 346422 062714 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 384416 7/3/2014 119454 VINOCOPIA 195.50 346037* 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 30 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 109.75 346036 0098881 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 429.24 346036 0098681 -IN 5822.5512 'COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 199.50 346035 0100086 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 682:50 346289 0100088 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 106.00 346288 0101567 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE" YORK SELLING 402.50 346290 0101516 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,929.49 129489 WADSWORTH, EMMA 384416 7/312014 102218. VINTAGE ONE WINES INC.° MODEL 346422 062714 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' 108.00 195.50 346037* 16616 5822.5513- COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE,. 50TH ST SELLING 171.50 346464 62315 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .50TH ST SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS PSTF FIRE TOWER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 220.00 JR GOLF PROGRAM CANCELLATION 345981 REFUND 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 220.00 384421 7/3/2014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 736.88 DUMPSTER 346099 6926197 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 736.88 384422 7/3/2014 132064, WINDFELDT, STEPHANIE 150.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES 346100 VIDEO SHOOT 5760.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL, S ADMIN EXPENSE.. 367.00 384417 7/3/2014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 43.36 BRATS 346421 79523 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 43.36 384418 7/312014 124969 W. L. HALL COMPANY 78.00 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 346434 33292 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES• 78.00 384419 7/3/2014 129489 WADSWORTH, EMMA 108.00 MODEL 346422 062714 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' 108.00 384420 713/2014 134418 WAGNER, LORI ARENA CONCESSIONS PSTF FIRE TOWER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 220.00 JR GOLF PROGRAM CANCELLATION 345981 REFUND 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 220.00 384421 7/3/2014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 736.88 DUMPSTER 346099 6926197 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 736.88 384422 7/3/2014 132064, WINDFELDT, STEPHANIE 150.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES 346100 VIDEO SHOOT 5760.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL, S ADMIN EXPENSE.. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384422 7/312014 132064 WINDFELDT, STEPHANIE Continued... 150.00 384423 7/312014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE ' 533.90 346038 364374 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 88.00 346039 364693 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 739.55 346465 364978 -00 5842.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,379.80 346291 365087 -00 5862.5513• COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,388.30 346466 365102 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,129.55 384424 7/3/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,899.90 346041 506799 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50THST SELLING 2,289.04 346040 507762 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 813.44 346294 - 507991 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 905.52 346468 508707 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 322.24 346293 508708 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.12 346295 508709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,554.15 346467 508710 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,049.61 346296 508712 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,096.96 346292 508713 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 121.12- 346297 65518 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 218.24- 346298 65663 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,680.62 384426 7/312014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA _ 2,185.60 346042 1080192941 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,803.86 346043 1060192942 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,944.34 346303 1080195966 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 73.15 346158 1080195967 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,758.76 346302 1080195968 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 112.04 346470 1080195969 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,112.40 346301 1080195971 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,030.97 346469 1080195972 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE SOTH ST SELLING 4,347.46 346299 1080195984 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.50 346300 1080195965 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,176.31 346157 1080195986 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.00- 346045 2080041025 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 147.00- 346046 2080041034 5822.5513 , COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.00- 346047 2080044433 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 26.00- 346308 2080044435 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 713/2014 - 7/3/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No. Account No - Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 384426 7/312014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 10.00- 346474 2080044441 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.00- 346307 2080044442 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 24.00- 346473 2080044456 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.00- 346306 2080044466 5862.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD.WINE VERNON SELLING 116.00- 346304 2080044475 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 132.00- 346472 2080044488 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 78.00- 346048 2080044505 5822.5513 COST-,OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 70.00- 346471 2080044519 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 70.00- 346305 2080044546 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30:31- 346044 - 2080046524 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . 50TH ST SELLING 24,868.08 384427 7/312014 124629._ WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 153.30 345982 1090241084 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS'SOLD,BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2,929.67 346049 1090244491 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 174.60 346050 1090244492 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,884.05 346051 1090244493 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 479.20 346310 1090244849 5862.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,889.00 346309 1090244850 5862.5514" COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,961.20 346159 1090245546 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD -BEER YORK SELLING 123.00 346160 1090245547 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 346161 1090245548 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,983.70 346477 1090248360 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER '. VERNON.SELLING 246.00 346476 1090248361 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 346476 1090248362 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON-SELLING 2,231.55 346480 1090248363 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 346.30 346479 1090248364 5822.5514 COST OF, GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,596:50 346478 1090246365 5842.5514 COST OF,GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22,084.07 - 384428 71312014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 10,451.18 51- 6644819 -9 346423 417218565 5720.6185 LIGHT 8 POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 10,451.18 384429 71312014 134464 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC 64,145.56 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346484 CREDIT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET _ 64,145.56 1,034,216.38 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,034,216.38 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/3/2014. _ — 7/3/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,026,217.83 A /PACH Payment 7,998.55 -Total Payments 1,034,216.38 7/1/2014 9:17:15 Page - 33 Business Unit R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7/3/2014 - 7/3/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 335,285.29 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,666.50 02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND - 1,529.48 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 180.00 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 370.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 16,578.10 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 390.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,157.17 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 386.82- 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 28,372.41 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,628.70 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 4,698.39 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 215,307.88 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 19,015.23 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,721.43 05800 LIQUOR FUND 262,677.37 05900 UTILITY FUND 88,945.60 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,846.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 15,295.26 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,164.55 ". Report Totals 1,034,216.38 We confirm to the best of our' knowledge and belief, that these claims . comply in all material -respects °with the requirements; °of the City of Edina purchasing poligieq a9d 7/1/2014 9:17:25 Page - 1 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 66 7/10/2014 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 470.15 346701 43667100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,005.15 346917 43760000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 195.90 346918 43760100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 94.80 346919 6448300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 111.71 346920 90450300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,877.71 66 7/10/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 53.20 SIGNATURE STAMPS 346769 IN -29824 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 52.50 WALL CLOCKS 346496 OE- 357032 -1 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 97.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00004021 346614 WO- 943619 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 203.21 67 7/10/2014 104020 DALCO 276.17 CUPS, TISSUE 00009345 346868 2761708 5111.6511 CLEANING_ SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 114.84 RESTROOM CLEANER _ 00001354 346869 2762894 1552.6406' GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 391.01 68 7/1012014 134466 FUTURE IQ PARTNERS 25,000.00 FILL SAND 346873 166 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 25,000.00 69 7/10/2014 102146 JESSEN PRESS 100.00 LETTERHEAD 346526 42682 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 140.00 LETTERHEAD 346527 42683 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 240.00 70 7/10/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 564.81 CONVERSIONS 00006175 346897 965898 -00 5422.6611' IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 564.81 71 7/10/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 294.93 TOWELS, GLOVES, WIPES 00008093 346648 7108 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 3,829.20 CHAIRS, TABLES, CART 346649 7109 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4,124.13 384430 7/10/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 68.40 346911 1789191 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 88.40 346695 1800568 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 41.60 346694 1800733 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 482.89 CITY OF EDINA 384435 7/10/2014 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346767 37524 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check '# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384430 7/1012014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY Continued... 281.95 38.00 346682 130290 346693 1801240 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50.80 346916 1802232 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 384437 104.40 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 346915 1802233 5842.5515 _ COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 156.40 144.95 346913 1802234 5862.5515; COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1628.6406 90.00 346914 180378B 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 108.00 384438 346912 1803789 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 746.00 752.00 384431 7/10/2014 346663 106476 ACE TRAILER SALES `1556.6200 INSURANCE 215.00 EZ -GATE LIFT 00005421 346766 S033731 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 215.00 384432 7/10/2014 129468 'ACME TOOLS 166.50- CREDIT 346851 2691358 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 WRENCH 00005418 346849 2695944 1553.6556 TOOLS 229.00 IMPACT WRENCH KIT 00005480 346850 2705491 1553.6556 TOOLS 212.50 384433 7/10/2014 121667 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC. 107.00 AED BATTERY 346491 0614 -214 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 107.00 384434 7/10/2014 101166 AHEAD INC 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page- 2 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS 482.89 JACKETS 346613 INVO209627 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES. FIELD MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS EMPLOYEE P- ^ED SERVICES 482.89 384435 7/10/2014 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. 160.00 PHONO CABLE, ANTENNAS 00001336 346767 37524 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 160.00 384436 7110/2014 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 281.95 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 346682 130290 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 281.95 384437 7/10/2014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 144.95 COFFEE 346492 155629 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 144.95 384438 7/1012014 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 752.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 346663 6100000153213 `1556.6200 INSURANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS EMPLOYEE P- ^ED SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 346698 .56721 5842.5514 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 1,003.00 346697 ' 56722 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL 59.95 346700 56723 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346699 56724 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 70.00 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 56725 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384438 7/10/2014 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN Continued... 752.00 384439 7/10/2014 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 663.10 CONCESSION PRODUCT 346493 406270455 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 663.10 384440 7/10/2014 118491 APPLE INC. 578.00 IPAD 00004319 346852 4284643926 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,802.00 IPADS 00004331 346853 4286568145 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,380.00 384441 7/10/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 112.78 COFFEE 346494 1129544 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 349.40 COFFEE 346683 1132181 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 462.18 384442 7/10/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 3 Business Unit. GRILL ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 873.00 346698 .56721 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,003.00 346697 ' 56722 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 59.95 346700 56723 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 101.50 346699 56724 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 70.00 346696 56725 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 384443 7/10/2014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 331.00 DUMPSTER 331.00 384444 7/10/2014 120995 AVR INC. 1,416.62 CONCRETE 11,221.43 CONCRETE 12,638.05 384445 7110/2014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 5,052.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5,052.40 384446 7/10/2014 118965 BCBS OF MN 1,455.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346854 062614 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 346984 063014 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 346984 063014 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 346768 23270354.13 -6 04406.1705.20 346985 DEBORAH 1470.4329 MCKNIGHT CONSULTING DESIGN AMBULANCE FEES 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION IMPR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger . Account Description .384446 7/1012014 118966 BCBS OF MN Continued... 718/2014 13:10:11 Page - 4 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,455.00 INSPECTIONS SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 384447 7/10/2014 134466 BECKLIN & WHITNEY 250.00 ENGINEERING DESIGN 00001371 346495 20140628.2 5913.6103 250.00 384448 7/10/2014 134474 BELLA CUSTOM HOMES 2,500.00 4314 BRANSON ST 346664 ED130247REFUND 1495.4109 2;500.00 384449 7/10/2014 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,231.39 JULY 2014 SERVICES 346855 143054 .7411.6136 1,231.39 384450 7/10/2014 134467 BENNETT, HEATHER 100.00 JR GOLF LESSONS REFUND 346666 070114 5401.4602 150.00 JR GOLF LESSONS REFUND 346665 REFUND 5401.4602 250.00 384461 7/10/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 150.95 COFFEE 346856 1182590 1552.6406 150.95 364462.7/10/2014 122599 BIOLAWN 99.90 WEED SPRAYING 346684 74113 1470.6180 99.90 384453 7/10/2014 125209 BISEK, KATIE 1,482.22 CONFERENCE EXPFENSES 346615 070114 5919.6104... 1,482.22 384464 7/1012014 126268 -. BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL 346857 JUL2014 -2 4095.6103 386.00 384466 7/10/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 45.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 346858 98661 1552.6406 45.66 384456 7110/2014 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 718/2014 13:10:11 Page - 4 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY LESSONS LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAINING 50TH STREET RUBBISH CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CITY OF EDINA 86.43 MOTOR 00005478 Council Check Register by GL 866985 1553.6530 880.05 U- BOLTS,, SPRINGS Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 867329 1553.6530 91.27 DASH PANEL 00005481 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 867721 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384466 7/1012014 31.57 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00005484 Continued... 868335 1553.6530 1,332.06 MOTOR STARTER 00001338 346497 907575376 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,332.06 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 384457 711012014 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC MATERIALS TESTING 346776 8000855 01404.1705.21 49.28- CREDIT 346772 70194574 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 393.99 AMBULANCE. SUPPLIES 00003797 346771 81460695 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 121.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003797 346770 81460696 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 5440.5511 121.56- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 346773 CREDIT 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 5440.5511 345.05 GOLF BALLS 346616 1002253133 384458 711012014 359.24 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 346619 1002254582 5440.5511 121.50 346702 120581 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 384462 7/10/2014 216.50 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 346921 120672 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 244.50 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /15/14 346922 120673 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 384459 7/10/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 86.43 MOTOR 00005478 346777 866985 1553.6530 880.05 U- BOLTS,, SPRINGS 00005424 346776 867329 1553.6530 91.27 DASH PANEL 00005481 346775 867721 1553.6530 187.04 HUB CAPS, HOSE, PIPE 00005484 346774 868155 1553.6530 31.57 HUB CAPS 00005484 346859 868335 1553.6530 1,276.36 384460 7/10/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 6,992.31 MATERIALS TESTING 346776 8000855 01404.1705.21 6,992.31 384461 7/10/2014 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 386.40 GOLF BALLS 346616 1002253131 5440.5511 424.08 GOLF BALLS 346617 1002253132 5440.5511 193.20 GOLF BALLS 346616 1002253133 5440.5511 359.24 GOLF BALLS 346619 1002254582 5440.5511 1,362.92 384462 7/10/2014 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7 /15/14 346487 070114 5760.6136 200.00 384463 7/10/2014 124366 CADY, MELISSA REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONSULTING INSPECTION 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page- 5 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS'_` PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384463 7/1012014 124366 CADY, MELISSA Continued... 52.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 346986 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 52.00 384464 7/10/2014 102149 CALLAWAY'GOLF 364.56 GOLF BALLS 346620 925285745 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 363.50- CREDIT 346623 925294674 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,296.54 MERCHANDISE 346621 925295700 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 389.94 MERCHANDISE 346622 925309037 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,687.54 384466 7/10/2014 130316 CANNON VALLEY SPECIALTIES 42.00 CREW SHIRTS FOR PARADE 346498 # 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 42.00 384466 7/10/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 848.15 346923 358738 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,629.83 346703 358739 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,477.98 . 384467 7110/2014 129923 CAWLEY 15.78 NAME BADGES 346499 V230746 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 15.78 384468 7/10/2014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 6,715.17 TOUGHPADS 00004318 346861 LV88875 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,825.04 TOUGHPADS 00004317 346860 LV88996 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 150.38 DOCKING STATIONS 00004332 346862 MP64666 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL`` 150.38 DOCKING STATIONS 00004332 346862 MP64666 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 12,840.97 384469 7110/2014 130603 CEDAR RIDGE LANDSCAPING INC. 13,794.59 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 346863 062514 01241.1705.30 CONTRA_ CTOR PAYMENTS A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING 13,794.59 384470 7/10/2014 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 23.82 9546705 -6 346500 9546705 -6/14 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 23.82 384471 7/1012014 123898 CENTURYLINK 123.30 952 831 -0024 346501 0024 -6/14 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC P' ?LDING - R55CKR2 LOGIS101 631.07 CITY OF EDINA 384472 7110/2014 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary SR CENTER PETTY CASH 346989 070814 1628.6406 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 183.98 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384471 7/10/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 55.58 952 929 -0297 346987 0297 -6/14 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 57.00 952 920 -8632 346502 8632 -6/14 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 354.75 952 927 -8861 346988 8861 -6/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 40.44 952 922 -9246 346503 9246 -6/14 1400.6188 TELEPHONE GENERALSUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POSTAGE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7/812014 13:10:11 Page- 7 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS, VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING INSPECTIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONSULTING INSPECTION REPAIR PARTS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 631.07 384472 7110/2014 118580 CITY OF EDINA 183.98 SR CENTER PETTY CASH 346989 070814 1628.6406 183.98 384473 7/10/2014 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 66.66 ABOUT TOWN AD 346779 COM -0297 5862.6122 66.67 ABOUT TOWN AD 346779 COM -0297 5822.6122 66.67 ABOUT TOWN AD 346779 COM -0297 5842.6122 200.00 384474 7/10/2014 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 1,204.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 346685 7114 1495.6103 1,204.00 384476 7/10/2014 106693 CITYSPRINT 17.42 COURIER FEE 346864 32088 1550.6235 17.42 384476 7/10/2014 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 727.87 GAS MONITOR MAINTENANCE 346504 156162 1470.6215 727.87 384477 711012014 134478 CLASSICAL ACTORS ENSEMBLE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/6/14 346990 070714 5760.6136 150.00 384478 7/10/2014 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 606.66 MATERIALS TESTING 346865 P00002958 01404.1705.21 606.66 384479 7/10/2014 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 11.57 KILN PARTS 00009346 346866 INV000089336 5111.6530 11.57 GENERALSUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POSTAGE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7/812014 13:10:11 Page- 7 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS, VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING INSPECTIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CONSULTING INSPECTION REPAIR PARTS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 384486 7/10/2014 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE Council Check Register by GL - 274.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346870 3355 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 274.00 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384480 7/10/2014 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. Continued... 24.60 258.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 346867 7070203772 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 258.00 346705 758625 384481 7/10/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 120638 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 346924 758857 390.72 PRO SHOP GIFT CERTIFICATES 346505 00070557 5410.6575 PRINTING 346707 390.72 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 121.80 384482 7/10/2014 346706 101495 CREATIVE IMAGES ON RIBBON INC. 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8,314.80 207.21 SKATING RIBBONS 346624 9319 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 384488 7/10/2014 207.21 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 384483 7/10/2014 13.39 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 346783 915585 1553.6556 TOOLS 8.58 GREASE SEALS 00005310 346781 163335 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270.00 BRAKEASSEMBLIES 00005420 346780 163439 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 278.58 384484 7/10/2014 134475 D R HORTON 2,500.00 6005 BEARD AVE 346667 ED128023 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2;500.00 384485 7/1012014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 7/812014 13:10:11 Page- 8 Business Unit PARKING RAMP GOLF ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS 4,962.00 QUARTERLY CONTRACT 346626 3012675 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 768.50 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIRS 346627 3012915 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 7,991.00 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIRS 346625 3013162 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS -ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 13,721.50 384486 7/10/2014 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE - 274.00 SOIL 00006255 346870 3355 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 274.00 384487 7110/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 24.60 346704 758624 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,459.90 346705 758625 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,827.85 346924 758857 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,880.65 346707 758858 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 121.80 346706 758859 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8,314.80 384488 7/10/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 13.39 REDUCER SET 00005423 346783 915585 1553.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT .2ATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No, Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384488 7/10/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 111.48 CHAIN PULLER 00005446 346782 916135 1553:6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.87 384489 7/10/2014 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 187.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346628 070114 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 187.04 384490 7/10/2014 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 60.21 BAKERY 346506 511278 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 72.81 346507 511486 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 70.20 346508 511900 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 7120 346509 511901 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 274.42 384491 711012014 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 4,358.53 REFUSE 346991 DT0000830408 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,837.37 REFUSE 346992 DT0000830409 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,082.96 REFUSE 346993 DT0000842525 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 8,278.86 384492 7/10/2014 120696 DRAPER, LAURENE 18.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 346994 070114 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.35 TRAINING EXPENSES 346994 070114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 143.35 384493 7/1012014 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 311.00 MERCHANDISE 346629 520136 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,127.54 346631 521206 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 33.18 346630 521444 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,471.72 384494 7110/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 300.00 CONGRATULATIONS GRADUATE AD 346668 110153 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 58.52 PUBLISH VARIANCES NOTICE 346632 115326 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 42.56 SWPPP MEETING NOTICE 346633 115327 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 234.08 PUBLISH ORD 2014 -06 346634 115328 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 234.08 PUBLISH ORD 2014 -08 346635 115329 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 638.40 PUBLISH ORD 2013 -12 346636 115330 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,507.64 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 384496 7110/2014 130120 EDINA COUNTRY. CLUB Continued... 152.76 BREAKFAST MEETING 346995 004194 -2014 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 152.76 384496 7/10/2014 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 1,592.50 EDINAART FAIR HOURS 346510 070114 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 1,592.50 384497 7/1012014 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 152.75 MANAGEMENT FEE 346871 063014 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 152.75 384498 7/10/2014 126415 EHMILLER, DAVID 143.99 UNIFORM BOOTS 346996 070214 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 143.99 384499 7/10/2014 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 15,000.00 MH RINGS 00001249 346784 TT3010 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 15,000.00 384600 7/10/2014 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 36.00 PROPANE 346997 070214 7411.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTFOCCUPANCY 36.00 - - 384501 7/1012014 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,837.00 JUNE BILLINGS 346785 1459 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,837.00 384602 '7/10/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 169.42 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 346788 1 -4470883 1553:6530, REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.03 TENSIONER 346791 .1 -4473203 1553.6530.7' REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 137.02- CREDIT 346793 1- 4473414 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 61.86 RESISTOR ASSEMBLY, FILTERS 346787 69- 142723 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 382.15 HUB ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE LININGS 346786 69- 142778 1553.6530 -, `' REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.44 BLOWER MOTOR 346789 69- 143147 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 161.57 TENSIONER, FULLY, BELTS 346790 69- 143188 15¢3.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.03 CABLE 346792 69- 143272 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 772.48 384603 7/10/2014 100766 FEDEX 18.06 SHIPPING CHARGE 346512 2- 694 -66138 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEP7 -`IERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384503 7/10/2014 100766 FEDEX Continued... 18.06 384504 7/10/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 7,416.94 METERS, PARTS 00001382 346794 0089304 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR . 106.31 SERVICE CHARGE FOR MAY 00001378 346511 SC5818 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 7,523.25 384605 711012014 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC. 258.91 HOSE GRIPPER 00003825 346686 8423 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 258.91 384506 7/10/2014 119211 FIRSTLAB 164.00 BREATH TESTS 346872 00792037 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 164.00 384607 7110/2014 133686 FISCHER MINING LLC 200.60 FILL SAND 00001383 346795 11323 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 209.78 FILL SAND 00001383 346796 11324 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS r 406.82 FILL SAND 00001383 346797 11325 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 627.98 FILL SAND 00001351 346910 11471 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 1,445.18 384608 7/10/2014 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 598.00 WINDOW CLEANING 346687 2315 -5973 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 598.00 384609 7110/2014 104980 FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 1,165.00 SOFTWARE 00001377 346513 127357 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,165.00 384610 7/10/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP RAGS 346874 1006348827 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.00 SHOP RAGS 346875 1006371590 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 30.00 384611 7/10/2014 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 54.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346998 070214 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 11.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346999 070314 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 49.70 COSTUME SUPPLIES 347000 070814 1132.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE COMMISSION 116.06 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 346638 40814958 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37.50 Council Check Register by GL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP . PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346639 40821776 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 37.50- Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384611 - 7/10/2014 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE Continued... 384612 7/10/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 384616 7110/2014 1,682.14 REPLACED RELIEF VALVES 346637 45097 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,682.14 384613 7110/2014 RAKES 00006258 134480 GAYTEE - PALMER STAINED GLASS 1020189639 5422.6406 - 280.00 REPLACED BROKEN GLASS 347001 060414 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 280.00 384614 7/1012014 384617 7110/2014 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 12 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT INSPECTIONS 1,607.09 MERCHANDISE 346638 40814958 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37.50 346640 40821753 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP . PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 903.85 MERCHANDISE 346639 40821776 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37.50- 346641 RMA4837141 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES - 2,510.94 ' 384616 7/10/2014 121484 GEHA 85.24 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 347002 CLARA RISCHALL 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 85.24 384616 7110/2014 106508 GEMPLER'S INC. 268.00 RAKES 00006258 346876 1020189639 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 268.00 384617 7110/2014 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 57.79 R -91 PHONE 346688 5669762 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 57.79 384618 7/10/2014 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 5.60 POSTAGE - CCR MAILING 346798 070114 5910.6235 POSTAGE 21.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346798 070114 5910.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 27.44 384619 7/1012014 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 2,289.15 JUNE 2014 SERVICE 00001387 346799 111435 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,289.15 384620 7/10/2014 101103 GRAINGER 67.20 MARKING PAINT 00001156 346514 9467562246 5913.6532 PAINT 117.76 ABSORBENT SOCKS 00008094 346877 9469104633 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE'& GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /r- '1JNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount 384520 7/1012014 400.40 22.00 269.60 385.72 32.11 1,294.79 384621 7/10/2014 4,791.00 Supplier / Explanation 101103 GRAINGER HOSE CARTS KEY REEL NITRILE GLOVES GAS CANS NOTICE SIGN 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 346708 168757 346926 168820 346925 168872 384622 7/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. Council Check Register by GL 346515 142259 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 142285 251.55 7/10/2014 - 7/1012014 142291 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 7/10/2014 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES Continued... 00001301 346878 - 9475854643 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 224.88 00005340 346800 9476818951 1301.6406 711012014 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00001352 346801, 9477373576 1646.6406 200.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00001348 346802 9477548516 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 384626 346879, 9479754623 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 346708 168757 346926 168820 346925 168872 384622 7/10/2014 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 294.81 START UP IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001374 346515 142259 777.71 346517 142285 251.55 346516 142291 1,324.07 384523 7/10/2014 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 224.88 BALL TOOLS 346518 52338 224.88 384624 711012014 100008 GRUBE, MIKE - 200.00 GOLF INSTRUCTION 347003 070714 200.00 384626 7/10/2014 130146 H2 GOLF COMPANY LLC 202.75 MERCHANDISE 346642 13308 202.75 384526 7/10/2014 100790 HACH COMPANY 212.01 REAGENTS 00001379 346519 8879091 212.01 384627 7/10/2014 134481 HAGENSON, ANIKA 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 1314.6180 1314.6180 1314.6180 5440.5511 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 13 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE MOWING PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 52.30 DUPLICATE PURCHASE REFUND 347004 SEASON PASS 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 52.30 384628 7/10/2014 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 16,797.84 CITY OF EDINA 384531 7/1012014 Council Check Register by GL • Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary BEEF PATTIES 346523 025227 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 177.12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384528 7/10/2014 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS Continued... 150.00 142.14 THERMAL ROLLS 346520 126710 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 142.14 384629 7110/2014 384633 711012014 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY 21.03 REIMBURSEMENT 346803 FUEL 5932.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 346880 54313064 21.03 GENERAL SUPPLIES 990.00 384530 7/10/2014 54313064 100797 HAWKINS INC. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7/812014 13:10:11 Page - 14 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL STORM SEWER 4,521.28 CHEMICALS 00001246 346522 3609386 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,008.96 CHEMICALS 00001246 346521 3610746 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 8,267.60 CHEMICALS 00001246 346804 3612342 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT GRILL ASSESSING ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PARKADMIN. GENERAL 16,797.84 384531 7/1012014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS • 177.12 BEEF PATTIES 346523 025227 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 177.12 384632 7/10/2014 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 347005 1000046943 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 150.00 384633 711012014 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY 687.16 LAPTOPS 00004315 346880 54313064 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 990.00 LAPTOPS 00004315 346880 54313064 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 63.99 LAPTOP ADAPTER 00004327 346881 54419196 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 377.77 LAPTOPS 00004327 346882 54443789 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 900.00 LAPTOPS 00004327 346882 54443789 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,928.92 384634 7110/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 571.50 346928 710513 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 981.00 346709 710515 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,520.50 346927 710721 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,073.00 384636 7/1012014 134471 HOLMES, KATY 65.00 SAFETY CAMP REFUND 346643 REFUND 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP 65.00 384636 7/1P ° -'4 126816 .HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES GRILL ASSESSING ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PARKADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 346929 2222431 5862.5514 2,910.15 346933 Council Check Register by GL 5822.5514 6,377.25 346930 2225584 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346931 2225588 5842.5514 134.20 346932 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014, 795.45 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384636 7110/2014 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Continued... 18.97 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 346805 061314 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.32 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 346805 061314 1301.6556 TOOLS 117.51 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 346805 061314 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 297.15 PW /ENG SUPPLIES 346805 061314 1646.6556 TOOLS 39.95 PW /ENGSUPPLIES 346805 061314 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 493.90 384637 7/10/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 366.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347006 070114 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 366.80 384638 7/1012014 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 240.55 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 346524 D279332 -IN 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 240.55 384639 7/10/2014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 176.40 BALL CHECK VALVES 00001159 346525 '850873 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 176.40 384640 7110/2014 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES'LLC 8,548.00 E911 CALL HANDLING SYSTEM 346807 080698 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 28,361.00 E911 CALL HANDLING SYSTEM 346806 080699 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 36,909.00 384641 7/10/2014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 51.50 346810 76888 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 51.50 346809 76889 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 346808' 76890 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 213.62 TOILET RENTAL 346528 76904 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 106.87 TOILET RENTAL 346529 76905 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 51.50 346811 77160 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 384642 7/10/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 33.30 346929 2222431 5862.5514 2,910.15 346933 2225576 5822.5514 6,377.25 346930 2225584 5862.5514 9,400.57 346931 2225588 5842.5514 134.20 346932 2225589 5842.5515 795.45 346530 2237741 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page- 15 Business Unit SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION TREES& MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION E911 E911 LITTER REMOVAL LITTER`REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE LITTER REMOVAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by. Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014, - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384642 7/10/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 19,650.92 384643 7110/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 18.01 346815 67701012 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 18.01- 346816 68430380 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 64.13 FERTILIZER 00006178 346884 68574856 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.12 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS 00001334 346813 68671201 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE - 115.38 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS 00001335 346812 68672668 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 16.89- CREDIT 00001335 346814 68685914 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 491.71 . SEVIN, ROUNDUP 00006364 346883 68689966 54216545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 689.45 384646: 7/1012014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. .28 346710 1884156 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS, SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,527.34 346717. 1884169 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,221.88 346712 - 1884182 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,392.49. 346711 1884184 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 360.44 346720 1888207 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,519.64 346715 1888208 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,012.83 346716 1888209 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,331.25 346719 1888213 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 1,034.83 346714 1888214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 884.73 346718 1888215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 94.11 346713 1888216 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 784.00 346946 1888661 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,407.90 346936 1890050 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 510.54 346937. 1890051 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST- SELLING 639.81 346938 1890052 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 282.87 346934 1890053 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,571.59 346947 1890054 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 757.34 346939 1890474 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 329.57 346935 1890475 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6,868.14 346941 1891622 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 948.90 346942 1891623 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS`SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,135.72 346945 1891627 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,279.34 346940 1891628 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE : YORK SELLING 814.46 346944 1891629 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 62.74 346943 1891630 5842.5515 COST OF G_ OODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 39,772.74 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/812014 13:10:11 Council Check Register,by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384546 7/10/2014 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Continued... 66.82 COOLER REPAIR PARTS 00001544 346886 059234 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 103.00 FUSES 00001544 346885. 059243 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 169.82 384547 7/1012014 134470 KATYAL, MAIRE 94.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 346644 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 94.00 384648 7/10/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 503.92 UNIFORMS 00003814 346531 247839 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 115.92 UNIFORMS 00003814 346689 247839 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 619.84 384549 7/10/2014 122516 KOPLOS, GERALD 82.95 AMMO FOR CLASS 347007 070314 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 82.95 384650 7/10/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 255.56 DWI TOW 347008 070714 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 255.56 384661 7/10/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW 347009 070814 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 153.74 384552 7/10/2014 116399 L'HEUREUX, ADAM 59.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346532 060614 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346533 061514 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 128.73 HARD DRIVE 346534 063014 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 220.70 384663 711012014 101792 LUBE -TECH 5,189.17 OIL 00005444 346817 2391281 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS, EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN 5,189.17 384554 7110/2014 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,149.25 346721 176587 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,149.25 384665 7/10/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384566 7/10/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Continued... 896.16 GAS 346888 681380 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 455.17 GAS 346889 681381 5423.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,213.03 DIESEL 00006404 346887 681382 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 12,382.02 DIESEL FUEL 00005430 346818 711684 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14,946.38 384666 7/10/2014 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 356.55 OXYGEN 00003649 346890 09477931 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 356.55 384667 7/10/2014 129169 MBFTE 3,075.00 LICENSING RENEWALS 346690 FIRE FIGHTER 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,075.00 384668 7/1012014 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 450.00 WELL INSPECTIONS 346891 210357 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 450.00 384659 7/10/2014 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 35.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT 347010 070214 1646.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.00 384660 7/1012014 103319 MEDALIST CONCERT BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/16/14 346489 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 384661 7/10/2014 106326 MEDRANO, CHRIS 2,354.00 GOLF INSTRUCTION 347011 070114 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 2,354.00 384662 7/10/2014 101483 MENARDS 269.82 POLY 00001234 346536 59917 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 159.96 TIE UVB BAGS 00001234 346535 59923 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 94.65 ROLLERS, BRUSHES 00006182 346892 60147 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 170.37 TIES, ANCHORS, LUMBER 00001341 346820 60231 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 14.09 PIPE STRAP, HOSE CLAMPS 00001355 346537 60333 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.36 STUDS, NAILS 00001400 346819 60682 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 763.25 384663 7/1f "7'4 100886 METRO SALES INC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384563 7/10/2014 100885 METRO SALES INC Continued... 15,506.65 RICOH MAINTENANCE & USAGE 346645 015007 -6/14 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 15,506.65 384564 7/10/2014 104650 MICRO CENTER - 8.98 PHONE SUPPLIES 00004402 346894 5040707 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 51.96 IT SUPPLIES 00004402 346895 5053805 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 60.94 384566 7/1012014 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 549.95 TOWELS, SOAP, TISSUE, LINERS 00003824 346893 35613 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 549.95 384566 7/10/2014 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 18,915.54 WATER PURCHASE 346896 431 - 0005300 -7/1 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 4 18,915.54 384567 7/10/2014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 21.38 WINDOW WASHING 346538 928025386 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.09 WINDOW WASHING 346539 928025387 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 37.47 384668 7/10/2014 100622 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 14.57 CAPACITOR 00001241 346821 1383520 -00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 14.57 384569 7/10/2014 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 288.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 346540 30299 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 288.00 384570 7/10/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 349.00 TANK, STEEL BANDS 00005477 346822 0105450 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT'OPERATION GEN 349.00 384571 7/10/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 49.00 NIGHT GOLF POSTERS 346541 15724 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 49.00 384572 7/10/2014 126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN 130.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 346823 070214 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGI9101 CITY OF EDINA 7/6/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice& Summary 7/1012014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384672 7/1012014 126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN Continued... 2,390.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 346823 070214 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMERGENCY - RESPONSE TEAM 2,520.00 384673 7/10/2014 103246 MOIR, BILL 541.00 EMERGENCY PLUMBING REPAIR 347012 070714 5311.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION - 541.00 384674 7/10/2014 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 2,403.00 MN GOLFER MAGAZINE AD 346542 2014 -31149 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,403.00 . 384675 7/1012014 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 45.00 CAMERA CLEANING 346543 0623407MTQZ 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 45.00 384676 7/10/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. - 332.50 346948 91568 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 211.00 346949 91579 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - VERNON SELLING 543.50 384677 7110/2014 - 106968 NHA HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING INC. 202.50 WELL CONTROLS 346898 19606616 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS' 202.50 364678 7/10/2014 104360 NIKE USA INC. - 1,198.17 MERCHANDISE 346646 961307318 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,198.17 384679 7/10/2014 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH 129.92 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 346647 070114 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 129.92 384680 7/10/2014 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/13/14 346485 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 75.00 384681 7/10/2014 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 EAP SERVICES -JULY 2014 346669 3662 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 658.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 346724 8454900 -IN 5862.5513 CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 1,083.76 346723 8454901 -IN 5862.5513 Council Check Register by GL VERNON SELLING 912.18 346950 8455325 -IN Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 50TH ST SELLING 92.45 346722 8455367 -IN 5822.5512 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 50TH ST SELLING Check # Date . Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384682 7/10/2014 CL PERFORMANCE 7/15114 121444 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE 070114 Continued... PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 120.00 NOTARY COMMISSION FEE 346899 HEATHER B 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 120.00 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 384683 7/1012014 1,256.59 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 346546 00402299 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 642.48 TOOLS, SLINGS 00001350 346824 541099 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 642.48 346547 00402343 5421.5510 384684 7/1012014 124619 OVERHOLT, JAMES 289.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347013 070214 1644,6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 289.52 384686 7/10/2014 128863 PALLET SERVICE CORPORATION 300.00 PALLETS 00001360 346544 93828 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00 384686 7110/2014 129486 PAPCO INC. 22.50 VACUUM REPAIR 346900 85694 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 95.26 TISSUE, TOWELS 346901 85703 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 117.76 384687 7/10/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 21 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS TREES & MAINTENANCE STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY 363.75 346724 8454900 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,083.76 346723 8454901 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 912.18 346950 8455325 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 92.45 346722 8455367 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,010.51 346951 8455735 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,462.65 384688 7110/2014 126492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 JUNE 2014 FEE 346902 32835729 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES 39.95 384689 7110/2014 124,366 PEARSON, JACK 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/15114 346488 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 250.00 384690 7/10/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,256.59 346546 00402299 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 452.89 346545 00402303 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 663.90 346547 00402343 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/812014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384690 7/10/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued... 819.60 PW OPEN HOUSE 346825 18488764 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 644.70 -, CREDIT 346826 18488777 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,548.28 384691 7/10/2014 134473 PETERSEN, NICHOLAS 64.37 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 346670 063014 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 64.37 384692 711012014 131339 PETROVIC, FRANK 48.46 PUBLIC ART BALLOT BOXES 347014 070714 2610.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 48.46 384593. 7110/2014 100960 PETTY CASH 1.26 346903 070114 1263.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ENVIRONMENT 5.85 346903 070114 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENT SVC PW 6.99 346903 070114 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 14.79 346903 070114 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 26.32 346903 070114 1261.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 54.88 346903 070114 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 98.00 346903 070114 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 16.08 346903 070114 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 68.80 346903 070114 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 114.40 346903 070114 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 14.00 346903 070114 5902.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE UTILITY BILLING -FINANCE 421.37 384594 7110/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE $ SPIRITS 2,040.38 346725 2626415 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 2,633.60 346726 2626429 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE VERNON'SELLING 1,526.46 346728 2629010 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,508.25 346727 2629011 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 477.76 346957 2630149 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 250.66 346959 2630150 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 831.09 346958 2630151 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING' 73.00 346956 2630366 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 112.92 346955 2631076 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 616.31 346952 2631079 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 957.34 346954 2631080 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,362.31 346953 2631081 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,390.08 7/812014 13:10:11 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 181.86 MONITORING 7/01/14 - 9/30/14 346650 12743654 -7/14 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 181.86 14 -12894 384698 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50TH ST SELLING 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING CITY OF EDINA 2,782.50. PLUMBING, RPZ TESTING 00001375 346549 16702 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Council Check Register by GL 2,782.50 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 384699 7110/2014 Council Check Register by- Invoice & Summary 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 272.00 846.53 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014' 2600 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384694 7/10/2014 126936 REINDERS INC. 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 384696 7/10/2014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 134007 PJ TAILORS & CLEANERS 1,420.00 384601 103.00 LAUNDER BLANKETS 346548 1601 1400.6201 LAUNDRY 008370 103.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 63.85 384696 7/10/2014 346692 100968. ,PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 44.89 PEST CONTROL 346904 4265132 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4075.5510 44.89 VANVALKENBURG 63.57 CHEESE, CRACKERS 384697 7/10/2014 9350 103094 PROTECTION ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 7/812014 13:10:11 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 181.86 MONITORING 7/01/14 - 9/30/14 346650 12743654 -7/14 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE 243.00 181.86 14 -12894 384698 7/10/2014 50TH ST SELLING 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 2,782.50. PLUMBING, RPZ TESTING 00001375 346549 16702 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,782.50 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 384699 7110/2014 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 272.00 846.53 TENSIONER 346827 10706 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2600 1120.6105 846.53 ADMINISTRATION 384600 7/10/2014 126936 REINDERS INC. 1,420.00 FERTILIZER 00001339 346828 3026996 -00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 1,420.00 384601 7/10/2014 114.96 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE 243.00 346960 14 -12894 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 243.00 384602 7110/2014 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 272.00 DUES - SCOTT NEAL 347015 2600 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 272.00 384603 7/1012014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 114.96 PLAYGROUND FOOD 346691 008370 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 63.85 ICE MOUNTAIN, SUN CHIPS 346692 009771 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 86.35 HOT DOG BUNS, CANDY 346651 9350 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 63.57 CHEESE, CRACKERS 346652 9350 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 328.73 _ R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 1,986.50 346732 1173848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE; Council Check Register by GL 3,425.00 -- 1173849 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 346737 1176842 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,000.72 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 5842.5512 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384604 7/10/2014 1177217 134472 SAXTON, JENNY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 750.00 Continued... 1177218 5822.5513 104.00 MINI HAWKS PROGRAM REFUND 346653 REFUND 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 104.00 346739 1177220 .5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 384605 7/10/2014 1177221 104161 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,338.50 346734 1177222 5862.5513 577.62 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 346905 8103772226 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 577.62 384606 711012014 100996 SEH 7,877.80 54TH ST BID DOCS & CPS 346829 282132 01416.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 24,165.80 ALDEN PARK STUDY 346830 282134 01412.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 32,043.60 384607 7/10/2014 134469, SEIDENSTRICKER, RUTH 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 346654 070114 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 100.00 384608 7/10/2014- 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 97.83 PAINTAND SUPPLIES 00001313 346550 2730 -3 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.83 384609 .7/10/2014, 120784 SIGN PRO 275.00, MUSIC IN EDINA BANNER 346906 7892 2611.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 275.00 384610 7/10/2014 105739 SNA2A, DAVID 98.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 346831 070114 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 364611 7/1 l2 1 98.97 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 24 Business Unit PARKADMIN. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS MUSIC IN EDINA GENERAL MAINTENANCE 0 0 4 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,986.50 346732 1173848 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE; YORK SELLING 3,425.00 346736 1173849 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11,713.75 346737 1176842 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,000.72 346738 1176843 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,436.25 346733 1176844 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,559.00 346731 1177217 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 750.00 346962 1177218 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,085.17 346730 1177219 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 270.43 346739 1177220 .5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,939.00 346735 1177221 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,338.50 346734 1177222 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SEI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384611 7/10/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS' Continued... 2,743.95 346729, 1177223 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,052.80 346961 1178652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 48, 301.07 384612 7/10/2014 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 7,415.40 3RD QUARTER 346671 201412 1132.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CABLE COMMISSION 7,415.40 384613 7110/2014 130710 SPRING, PAUL 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/17114 346490 070114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 384614 7/10/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 169.23 TOILET REPAIR PARTS 00001347 346832 S2926191.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 169.23 384616 7/10/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 723.33 EDINA-LIQUOR AD 347016 100014627 -06042 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING . 014 723.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 347016 100014627 -06042 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 014 723.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 347016 100014627 -06042 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 014 2,170.00 384616 7/10/2014 100617 STARBRITE WINDOW CLEANING 134.09 WINDOW WASHING 346907 5343 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 134.09 384617 7/10/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 247.75 346963 3371 5862.5514 247.75 384618 7/10/2014 134479 STEPHAN HOME CONSTRUCTION INC. 2,500.00 5700 GROVE ST 347017 ED128719 1495.4109 2,500.00 384619 7/10/2014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 96.28 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 346551 062814 5410.6406 96.28 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2,333.18 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 384623 7/10/2014 121263. THAYER, LARRY, Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 151.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347018 070314 Council Check Register by Invoice& Summary 151.20 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384619 7/10/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 902.00. Continued... 831163 384620 7/10/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 346552 832155 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER . 99.11 CABLES 00005480 346833 1565836 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 130.55 3,138.35 VEHICLE REPAIRS 346834 651300 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,987.40 3,237.46 384626 7/10/2014 384621 7/10/2014 130367 TASC 1,200.00 FITNESS TRAINING 347019 EFD- JUN2014 186.00 MAY 2014 COBRA 346655 IN321686 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 186.00 384626 7/10/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 384622 7/1012014 104932 TAYLOR MADE EDINA LIQUOR AD 346557 2014 - 116152 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 810.44 MERCHANDISE 346656 22352031 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES - 330.06 171.30 346557 346657 22353312 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 550.00 GOLF COURSE & DOME AD 846.25 2014- 126074 346659 22377116 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF COURSE & DOME AD 346555 966.73 5410.6122 346658 22377117 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 461.54- CREDIT 346660 22515074 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TREES & MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMIN' NTION 2,333.18 384623 7/10/2014 121263. THAYER, LARRY, 151.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347018 070314 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 151.20 ' 384624 7110/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 56.00 346554 00772020 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 902.00. 346553 831163 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 811.50 346552 832155 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER . 5,087.35 346741 832988 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 130.55 346740 832992 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6,987.40 384626 7/10/2014 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 1,200.00 FITNESS TRAINING 347019 EFD- JUN2014 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,200.00 384626 7/10/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 346557 2014 - 116152 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 330.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 346557 2014 - 116152 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 330.06 EDINA LIQUOR AD 346557 2014- 116152 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 550.00 GOLF COURSE & DOME AD 346556 2014- 126074 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 550.00 GOLF COURSE & DOME AD 346555 2014- 126075 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER TREES & MAINTENANCE GRILL GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMIN' NTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384626 7/10/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. Continued... - 2,090.00 384627 7/10/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 25.12- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 346836 2880138 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 109.50 SPIDER, RETAINER, FILTER 00005426 346835 4112511 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 84.38 384628 7/10/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 199.43 SHIELD CUP BODY 00005434 346838 10030693 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 329.67 READY PAK, NOZZLE TIPS 00005438 346837 10030744 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 529.10 384629 7/10/2014 123649 TOWMASTER 320.84 HITCH EXTENSION 00005439 346839 359932 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 320.84 384630 7/10/2014 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 3,375.00 FURNISH /INSTALL FENCE 346840 3041034 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,375.00 384631 7/1012014 102176 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO 506.07 HYDRAULIC UNIT REPAIRS 346558 0270502 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 506.07 384632 7110/2014 129734 TSAI, ALBERT 71.00 ART CLASS REFUND 347020 070114 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 71.00 384633 7/1012014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 32.92 BELT 00005474 346841 J188746 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 32.92 384634 7/10/2014 120661 UNITED STATES TREASURY 150.00 2014 PCORI FEES 347021 720 -V 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150.00 384636 7/1012014 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 14.80 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001386 346842 TRAN:7012. 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14.80 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page- 27 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PATHS & HARD SURFACE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger - Account Description 384636 7/1012014 114236 USA BLUE BOOK Contlnued... 678.21 LOCATE FLAGS 00001378 346559 367583 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 678.21 384637 7/10/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO, 31.33 SOAP 346560 314862 -01 5421.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 31.33 384638 7/10/2014 132073 VELNER; TERI 75.00 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND 347022 REFUND 1600.4390.01 75.00 384639 7/10/2014 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 35.02 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 347023 9721603073 5910.6188 33.02 347023 9721603073 5952.6188 33.06 347024 9723320797 _ 5910.6188 33.04 347024 9723320797 5952.6188 20.24- 347025 9725034322 5910.6188 19.16- 347025 9725034322 5952.6188 - .3,032.06 347027 9726214800 1400.6406 95.88 347027 9726214800 5910.6188 140.04 347026 9726738847 1322.6185 140.04 347026 9726738847 1140.6188 283.60 347026 9726738847 1554.6188 457.48 347026 9726738847 1260.6188 890.34 347026 9726738847 1495.6188 1,470.50 347026 9726738847 1470:6188 1,585.06 347026 9726738847 1400.6188 420.16 347026 9726738847 5910.6188 ' 8,609.90 384640 7/10/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY - 78.85 BULBS, RECEPTICAL BOXES 00001315 346561 8377182 1470.6406 33.23 PVC.REPAIR•000PLING . 00001314 346843 8397413. 1322.6406 112.08 384641 7/10/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA 146.50 346742 0098826 -IN 5822.5513 121.75 346743 0101771 -IN 5862.5515 186.50 346964 0101856 -IN 5822.5512 114.50 346965 0101857 -IN 5822.5513 PLAYGROUND TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERALSUPPLIES TELEPHONE LIGHT & POWER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 28 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION GRILL PARKADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) RECYCLING GENERAL (BILLING) RECYCLING GENERAL (BILLING) RECYCLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. GENERAL (BILLING) STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL. PLANNING CENT SERV GEN - MIS ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SEL' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384641 7/10/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA Continued... 5822.5513 5913.6103 1600.4390.02 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 29 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TENNIS PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 569.25 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 384642 7/10/2014 50TH ST SELLING 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 89.75 5862.5512 346966 62333 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 89.75 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 384643 7/10/2014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 1,106.40 LEAK LOCATES 00001376 346562 5142 1,106.40 384644 7/10/2014 134466 WELECZKI, NICOLE 25.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 346661 REFUND 25.00 384646 7/10/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 672.25 346967 365496 -00 617.20 346969 365651 -00 849.45 346968 365652 -00 2,138.90 384646 7/10/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 324.80 346744 101312 2,664.08 346972 509614 1,164.48 346970 509841 3,748.85 346971 509842 7,902.21 384647 7110/2014 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 2,539.83 FUNGICIDE 346908 59498558 2,539.83 384649 7110/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 5,153.00 346761 1080194212 5,303.52 346754 - 1080195965 1,178.12 346751 '1080195970 14,470.63 346760 1080195973 213.75 346753 1080197197 3,780.25 346745 1080197198 227.27 346758 1080197199 495.75 346759 1080197809 5822.5513 5913.6103 1600.4390.02 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 29 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TENNIS PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5431.6545 CHEMICALS DISTRIBUTION PARKADMIN. GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 384649 7/1012014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 5,191.59 346975 1080197985 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 396.60 346750 1080197986 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,736.55 346748 1080197987 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 605.75 346757 1080198046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _ YORK SELLING 2,225.69 346746 1080198645 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 131.89 346756 1080198646 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,120.70 346755 1080198647 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,122.35 346752 1080198649 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,257.49 346749 1080198650 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,528.50 346973 1080199391 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,154.45 346976 1080199392 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,823.55 346974 1080199393 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,858.25 346747 124291 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 64,975.65 " 384660 7110/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 320.00 346564 1090248366 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 125.00 346563 1090248367 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,652.70 346763 1090249121 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER . VERNON SELLING 2,514.00 346977 1090249122 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,881.85 346762 1090250033 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 678.00 346764 1090250034 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 346765 1090250035 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,566.42 346979 1090251764 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.50 346978 1090251765 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,388.72 346982 1090251766 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 123.00 346981 1090251767 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 64.50 346980 1090251768 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX_ 50TH ST SELLING 20,400.19 384,661 7/10/2014 134051 WRASE, PATRICK 133.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 347029 063014 1261.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 134.50 MN BOARD OF AELSLAGID 347028 070114 1261.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 267.78 384663 7110/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 37.36 51- 0194596 -8 346574 417116293 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 29.49 51- 0160483 -1 346577 417117028 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 28.33 51- 0223133 -2 346573 417117896 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 46.83 51- 4420190 -3 346572 417180029 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL C \L R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384653 7/10/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 1,369.81 51- 5107681 -4 346673 417189970 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER 28.87 51- 6050184 -2 346844 417209750 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 68.85 51- 6692497 -0 346568 417220605 1460.6185. LIGHT & POWER 17.27 51- 6541084 -2 346579 417240838 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 40.52 51- 8997917 -7 346570 417247912 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,741.42 51- 9011854-4 346565 417250636 5913.6185 LIGHT& POWER 84.81 51- 9770164 -7 346581 417256372 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 25.42 51- 9770163 -6 346580 417259232 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 84.12 51- 0010166207 -2 346578 417264565 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 790.75 51- 0010060454 -7 346672 417267183 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER 23.98 51- 0010118404 -0 346583 417268394 1322.6185. LIGHT & POWER 40.12 51- 0010103585 -7 346582 417272752 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER 229.53 51- 0193479 -4 346567 417283715 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,315.26 51- 5547446 -1 346680 417369540 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER 177.65 51- 8987646 -8 346576 417416567 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 36.97 51- 8976004 -9 346571 417422847 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 7,235.71 51- 9603061 -0 346681 417428512 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER 148.66 51- 9608462 -5 346566 417431920 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER 27,929.46 51- 4621797 -2 346569 417541955 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 31.46 51- 8102668 -0 346575 417575361 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 545.11 51- 9251919 -0 346584 417588953 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER 441.90 51- 6229265 -9 346674 417617764 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,394.46 51- 6229265 -9 346674 417617764 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER 7,542.41 51- 4827232 -6 346679 417701998 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,753.48 51-5634814-2, 346676 417716434 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 386.72 51- 6046826 -0 346675 417724422 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER 148.87 51- 5938955 -6 346677 417724557 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER 178.59 51- 9337452 -8 346678 417774334 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 29,818.46 514888627 -1 347030 418054535 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 10,849.10 51- 6955679 -8 347031 418112316 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER 96,621.75 384654 7/10/2014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 402.00 346983 13076 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 402.00 384656 7/10/2014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 160.90 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 346662 54060767 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 160.90 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 31 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT AQUATIC WEEDS CIVILIAN DEFENSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM STORM LIFT STATION MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CENT SVC PW BUILDING SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PROMENADE EXPENSES YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION STORM LIFT STATION MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS AQUATIC WEEDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL YORK SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/10/2014 — 7/1012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 384656 7/10/2014 101091 ZIEGLER ING Continued... 455.02 OIL GASKET, 0 -RINGS 00005272 346846 PC001565477 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 52.26 DAMPER 00005419 346847 PC001574682. 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 267 ;93 HOSE, COUPLINGS 00005476 346848 PC001576033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 547.17- CREDIT 346845 PR000136075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 392.22 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 346909 SW050220297 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 620.26 384657 7/10/2014 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/14/14 346486 070114 100.00 760;050.79 Grand Total 5760.6136 Payment Instrument Totals PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER Checks 727,649.92 A/P ACH Payment 32,400.87 Total Payments 760,050.79 7/8/2014 13:10:11 Page - 32 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIP MENTOPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 7/8/2014 13:10:22 Council Check Summary Page- 7/10/2014 - 7/10/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 198,491.15 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 37,318.30 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 323.46 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 63,966.53 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,728.55 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 830.87 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 8,135.71 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,657.27 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 50,164.13 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,670.11 05800 LIQUOR FUND 264,463.68 05900 UTILITY FUND 75,137.65 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 25,231.40 05950 RECYCLING FUND 46.90 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,885.08 Report Totals 760,050.79 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s cind nr^f%nr81 Irww -1—&— .19 1 1 \ K er U rips , 1�A, o e • CORPORA7., BBB - To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. C. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: July 15, 2.014 Information ❑ Subject: New On -Sale Wine & Beer Liquor Licenses Pie Wild, Inc. dba PizzaRev, 7529 France Avenue Action Requested: Motion approving new an On -Sale Wine & Beer Liquor Licenses Pie Wild, Inc. dba PizzaRev, 7529 France Avenue, for the period beginning July 15, 2014 and ending March 31, 2015. Information / Background: Pie Wild, Inc. dba PizzaRev applied for new wine and beer liquor licenses for their new restaurant located at 7529 France Avenue. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. I have attached Sgt. Draper's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for. consideration by the Council. City of Edina • 4.801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE Establishment: Pie Wild Inc. dba: PizzaRev License: On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor On 07/03/14, The Edina Police Department completed an investigation relating to City of Edina application for an Qn -Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. The application was submitted by Pie Wild, Inc. dba: PizzaRev. PizzaRev is a new business to Edina and will operate at 7529 France Ave, Edina, MN 55435. Pie Wild, Inc. was duly formed in the State of Minnesota, and is registered with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Pie Wild, Inc. is active and in good standing in Minnesota. I spoke with Katherine Becker; Becker Law Firm P.A. Ms. Becker represents Pie. Wild,, :Inc. in connection to the. City of Edina's liquor licensing process. Ms. Becker stated Pie Wild; Inc. is aware of the City's requirements with regards to alcohol awareness training for employees. Ms. Becker indicated Pie Wild, Inc. will provide an approved program for PizzaRev staff in accordance with Edina City Code. Owners/Partners/Members PizzaRev / Pie Wild, Inc: Sally Jeanne Wold Edina MN James Michael Schmidt Plymouth MN Mary Jane Twinem Plymouth MN Emily Clark Decker Plymouth MN Kathleen Mary Benning Plymouth MN The owners /partners /members have been investigated and were found to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent Pie Wild, Inc. dba: PizzaRev from obtaining a On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Sgt. Tom Draper # 150 To: Mayor and Council From: Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: 2014 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal oe )o(n \� 18PBB6 AT�O • Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: June 30, 2014 NA Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: I. Software House International - MN State Contract 1. $51,311 #436392 Recommended Quote or Bid: Software House International - MN State Contract # 436392 General Information: This is the second year of a three -year agreement with Microsoft for the licensing of our current (344) Enterprise Software Agreement licenses. This contract allows the City the ability to upgrade operating systems and Office Suite software for these existing desktops and laptops and their replacements as many times as necessary over the life of our three year contract. The City benefits by achieving standardization, software upgrades for the life of the contract, priority Microsoft support, and citywide system compatibility. The Central Services General account will pay for this expenditure. Staff recommends we proceed with this contract. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: July 15, 2014 w9)-- A,r� o e i, , g �y Agenda Item #: IV. E. The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -13 Edina Industrial Park Lighting Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: July 8, 2014 Company: Killmer Electric Co., Inc. LPD Electric Inc. Granite Ledge Electrical Contractors, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Killmer Electric Co., Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: September 8, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $154,912.00 $156,209.75 $160,931.75 $154,912.00 General Information: The Edina Industrial Lighting Project is a plan to replace the street lighting system located within the Edina Industrial Park. There are approximately 64 lights that are in need of replacement within this project area. This includes fixtures, poles, foundations, conduit, and service cabinets. The replacements will be carried out in a series of projects scheduled through 2016. Originally planned for 4 Phases within the 2013 -2017 City of Edina Capital Improvement Plan, $208,000 was established for this project through years 2013 and 2014. The 2013 and 2014 Phases have been combined into a single project for constructability purposes. This first Phase of the project includes 22 of the 64 lights accounting for 34% of the overall project. The Engineers estimate for the first phase of the project was $204,028. The lighting design engineer from SEH, Inc. has reviewed the submitted bids and bidder qualifications and recommends awarding the project to Killmer Electric Co., Inc. In addition, the submitted bids are very competitive and it may be advantageous to add lighting fixtures to the project. SEH and Edina staff will examine the overall system plan and discuss with Killmer Electric the possibility of adding lighting fixtures to this project, within current budget allowances. The existing high pressure sodium cobrahead luminaires operate at 310 watts each. The project will install new poles equipped with LED luminaires that operate at 145 watts each. We will realize a 53% energy savings under normal operating conditions. Maintenance costs associated with the new system will be greatly reduced due to the elimination of regular lamp changes that are characteristic of the old high pressure sodium luminaires. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Killmer Electric Co., Inc. GAPWICENTRAL WMENG DMPROJECTS%CONTRACT51 OMENG 14 -13 Industrial Park Lighting\L60Industrial Park LlghtingXADMIN\MISCNtrm N.E. ENG 14.13 RFP.doos City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 4, 2014 'k O i4 N Agenda Item #: IV. F. Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 4, 2014. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the June 4, 2014 Traffic Safety Committee Report at their June 19 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: • Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 4, 2014 • Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2014 G:\ Engineering \lnfrascruccure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports\2014 \Item IV. F. Traffic Safety Report of June 4, 2014.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Traffic Safety Committee Report Wednesday, June 4, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on April 02. The City Engineer, Police Traffic Supervisor, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Intern, and the Director of Public Works were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 19 Edina Transportation Commission and the July 15 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request to retime pedestrian walk phase at intersection of 77th Street and Burgundy Place (access . drives) This request concerns pedestrian crossing times for crossing 77th Avenue. The current total pedestrian phase is 30 seconds, with 12 seconds a walk sign and 18 seconds as the pedestrian clearance interval. The street from push button to edge of traveled way is 98 feet wide along the crosswalk on the west side of the intersection; the east side is 74 feet. (North side is 68 feet wide and has a 12 second pedestrian clearance time). MNMUTCD 4E.6 Guidance: . • The pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to allow a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk who left the curb or shoulder at the end of the WALKING PERSON (symbolizing WALK) signal indication to travel at a walking speed of 3.5 feet per second, to at least the far side of the traveled way. • When pedestrians who walk„' t gW" , ;_•!�_`'� slower than 3.5 feet per Map: pedestrian crossings at W. 77th Street and Burgundy Place second, or pedestrians who use wheelchairs, routinely use the crosswalk, a walking speed of less than 3.5 feet per second should be considered in determining the pedestrian clearance time. • Except as provided in below, the walk interval should be at least seven seconds in length so that pedestrians will have an adequate opportunity to leave the curb or shoulder before the Traffic Safety report Page 1 of 4 June 4, 2014 e r t When pedestrians who walk„' t gW" , ;_•!�_`'� slower than 3.5 feet per Map: pedestrian crossings at W. 77th Street and Burgundy Place second, or pedestrians who use wheelchairs, routinely use the crosswalk, a walking speed of less than 3.5 feet per second should be considered in determining the pedestrian clearance time. • Except as provided in below, the walk interval should be at least seven seconds in length so that pedestrians will have an adequate opportunity to leave the curb or shoulder before the Traffic Safety report Page 1 of 4 June 4, 2014 pedestrian clearance time begins. OPTION: If pedestrian volumes and characteristics do not require a 7- second walk interval, walk intervals as short as 4 seconds may be used. • The total of the walk interval and the pedestrian clearance time should be sufficient to allow a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk who left the pedestrian detector at the beginning of the WALKING PERSON (symbolizing WALK) signal indication to travel at a speed of 3 feet per second to the far side of the traveled way being crossed. Any additional time that is required to satisfy the conditions of this paragraph should be added to the walk interval. Following the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards, timing should be 5 seconds of WALK and 28 seconds of pedestrian clearance time. After discussion, staff recommends retiming the pedestrian signal to conform with MNMUTCD standards and to avoid a significant negative effect on the traffic flow in the area. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: B1. Request to add "Children At Play" sign at the intersection of Wood End Drive and France Avenue. This request comes from a builder working on a residence on Wood End Drive, concerned for children's safety when he starts hauling the house demolition materials, asked for a "Children At Play" sign to be installed. Neither the national nor the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) recognizes the sign. A state that does recognize the sign is New York, which states that the sign should only be used in areas where children playing in the street would be unexpected. Map: Wood End Drive and France Avenue This road is a cul -de -sac, with no sidewalk, and has several houses with play equipment in their front yards. There is a "No Outlet" sign located on the road, and the road bends to the south soon after the intersection. After discussion, staff recommends denying the request based on the lack of guidance in the the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Minnesota. Photo: Entrance to Wood End Drive from France Avenue Traffic Safety report Page 2 of 4 June 4, 2014 B2. Request to change winter, overnight parking restrictions. This request comes from a resident, who initially made the request at the December 3, 2013 City Council Meeting. The requestor lives on the 4200 block of Grimes Avenue and wishes to repeal the seasonal overnight parking ban and to enhance City authority to prohibit parking in the event of a snowfall. The resident proposed enforcing the ban only on nights when snow is forecasted (i.e. a "snow emergency" declaration). The requestor conducted research and states that overnight on- street parking is a valuable asset and that the ban is "unique among Twin Cities municipalities." He also states that the ban (in particular the 1:OOam time) has a negative effect on social gatherings and is a safety concern. Requestor says that "a guest who has been drinking is poised with a decision between potentially allowing their vehicle to be towed and moving their car while drunk." After discussion, staff recommends denying the request, based on current ease of enforcement and snow removal, as well as the relative difficulty of enforcement in nearby communities that declare snow emergencies. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date: C1. Request to remove "No Pedestrian" pictorial signs from the intersection of 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue, and to install pedestrian signals This request concerns the bus stops on 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue and the pedestrian environment of the intersection. Currently there are near side bus stops, and signs banning pedestrians from crossing the north, south and east approaches. The concern. u_ is that a law- abiding user of transit would be unable to use the bus stops, due to the ban on pedestrian movements. Specifically the north and east approaches were requested to have their signs removed and pedestrian signals installed. The Minnesota Manual on F Uniform Traffic Control Devices, section'.> 26.51, addressing such signs states in the 0 support section that the sign is intended to be used on only one leg of an intersection, in order to provide access. Photo: 77`x' Street and Parklown Avenue, looking west Traffic Safety report Page 3 of 4 June 4, 2014 After discussion, staff recommends further study of the intersection to see how more pedestrian access might affect the level of service of the intersection, and to evaluate this request with others that have been received on this intersection. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. Map of bus stops located at W. 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue D1. Request was made to revise traffic signal timing for northbound France Avenue left turn signal at TH 62. Voicemail was left with requestor, referring her to Hennepin County, who operates the traffic signals at this location. D2. Request was made to EPD to install a red flag on the stop sign at W. 60th Street and Chowen Avenue, due to increased traffic resulting from the Xerxes Avenue bridge closure. Requestor was informed that these measures are typically taken when traffic control changes and not for a temporary condition. D3. A resident called regarding the yield sign located at the southbound ramps onto TH 100 from Vernon Avenue /Eden Avenue. She stated that it is dangerous as motorists often do not yield at that location, where two ramps converge. Her request was forwarded to MnDOT. D4. A resident called with a concern for severe speeding on Mirror Lakes Drive between Hidden Lane and Ayshire Blvd. A speed study was done and results were forwarded to EPD for enforcement. D5. A resident called requesting that the "Disabled Child" signs be removed from the 6300 block of Wilryan Avenue, stating that the resident who had originally requested the signs had recently moved. This was verified, and the signs were removed by public works staff. Traffic Safety report Page 4 of 4 June 4, 2014 DRAFT Edina Transportation Commission June 19, 2014 Minutes Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 4 2014 D -2: Planner Nolan was asked if a comprehensive neighborhood study could be done because of recurrent complaints in the area so that they can identify the problem(s) and find solution(s). Member Spanhake said this would probably be an ideal capstone project for an engineering student. She will check on this and report back. B -1: The issue was referred to the TSC by Cindy Larson, residential redevelopment coordinator. B -2: The attachment was not included in the report. Planner Nolan will rewrite the recommendation for better clarity. C -1: Chair Bass said it is important that they are being careful to balance the level of service for pedestrians and motor vehicles. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Whited to forward the June 4, 2014, report with the attachment and edits for B -2 to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Student Members - None uIFIw L-un la vv uIr," IV, UIUU — IVIIIIUW5 U IVIdV 25 LU14 Member Jan said planner Nolan attended their last meeting. She said they discussed infr/should nd ordinance changes, and on utstanding issue with the sidewalk ordinance change is that a violation wisdemeanor. She recommended t they review the code to see where they can make changes. She said distribute what she's put together far. Living Streets Workin NHome Planner Nolan said they reviecross sections or network of Livin eets and discussed topics and goals for the July 1 City Counce said they also talked about id ti�jrn g people that they can feature to champion Living Streets sin Heroes, for example, engi ering e awar e of a couple residents who were against a sidewalk using it. Planner Nolan was asked if anyone is working on the en str s piece of the Living Streets Policy and he said environmental engineer Ross Bintner is working on it. Communications Committee Member La Force said they discussed: • The new boards and commissions b to determine if they wo participate and he said they agreed that they would use it for more in -d issues; • Getting the message out ab biking on sidewalks; • How they can better coo inate with other departments, for example, th olice's recent bike campaign; • Pedestrian Facilities p is really a Sidewalk Map and therefore should be c ed Sidewalk Map; • Forwarding webs' recommendations to planner Nolan that was suggested las ear. — None. CHAIR AND ROMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member hited said the letter to Ms. Arbelig was completed and ready to be mailed. P�eber Olson noted that City Council approved the Olinger Boulevard bike striping based on the original 4 (4- O 'r1A. _L O To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV. G. The Recommended Bid is From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works ❑ Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: 07/15/2014 Subject: Purchase of a 2014 Cat 272d Skid Steer, Public Works- Street Department. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: 06/26/2014 07/26/2014 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Ziegler Equipment $47,804.00 901 west 94th Street, Minneapolis, MN. 55420 Recommended Quote or Bid: Ziegler Equipment, MN /DOT state bid contract # 71060 General Information: This is a replacement vehicle for 25 -418, an 2002 Case 90XT skid steer that has significant wear and should be replaced. The life of a skid steer in commercial use is 10 years and 25 -418 is 14 years old. The amount of the quote above reflects a $10,000 trade in value for the replacement vehicle. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL w91��1� e.' H�v may° Agenda Item #: IV. H. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: July 15, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -80 Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -80 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements for sanitary sewer and water services for the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas. Information / Background: For the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas, residents were encouraged to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of -way line, as well as their water service line. Some property owners have upgraded their service lines and requested that the extra cost be added to their special assessment. The attached signed agreements and resolution allow us to add the cost immediately as pending assessments. The final total special assessments will not be known until late 2015. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -80 Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements: • One — Morningside B Neighborhood • One — Birchcrest B Neighborhood • One — Todd Park F Neighborhood G:U WICENTRAL SVCS\ENG D11APROf ECTMCONTRACTSUOMENG 14-1 Morningside MADMIN\LEGAUSewer Repairs \Item IV. H. Res. No. 2014 -80 Special Assessment Agreements.dooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -80 APPROVING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS AND PENDING ASSESSEMENTS WHEREAS, at the request of Edina City Engineer, property owners in the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project areas were encouraged to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of -way line, as well as their water service line; and WHEREAS, property owners have upgraded their service lines and requested that the extra cost be added to their special assessment; and WHEREAS, property owners signed a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement allowing the City to add the cost to their special assessment; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements are approved for the following properties: 1. PID 07- 028 -24 -44 -0089, 4303 Eton Place, $2,595.00 2. PID 33- 117 -21 -34 -0031, 6116 Birchcrest Drive, $3,200.00 3. PID 18- 028 -24 -22 -0037, 4650 44`h St. W., $4,150.00 2. The Assessments are deemed pending as of the date this Resolution is approved by the City Council. ADOPTED this 15'h day of July, 2014. Atte Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly' clbpted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 15, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT JUL 1 2014 AND CITY OF EDINA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT PUBLIC, WORKS, AGREEMENT made this �_ day -of c��G 20 /by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Stev n Grant & Jane M Leese, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 084, Block , Subdivision Morningside, having a street address of 4303 Eton Place, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property'). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -1. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Highview Plumbing, Inc., 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor') to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2620 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2620 for the amount of $2,595.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,595.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -1. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -1, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 PROPERTY O74f 2,4m Steven Grant Leese a A�� ne gleese STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument vas acknowledged before me this 7 day of J " y 1 20� by 5 u scam✓ (.eg-se— NOTARY LIC SGREG T AASKQ NOTARY RUBLIC • MINNSSOTIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES,01131118 BY: CITY OF EDINA _►W STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this J day of <'J V Y I 20 ` ! by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Nicholas J & Kimberly S Wand, husband and wife, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot , Block 003, Subdivision Birchcrest, having a street address of 6116 Birchcrest Drive, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14-4. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing, 1424 3`d Street No., Minneapolis, MN 55411, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2610 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 261.0 for the amount of $3,200.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,200.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard a Edina„ Minnesota. 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov• 952- 826 - 0371.• Fax 952 -826 -0392 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF st ) by The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -2- day of , 201 Y, DAVID ESTEBAN CARDENAS NOTARY PUSUC - MINNESOTA MYCOMMISSIONE)PIRES01/31 /2019 CITY OF EDINA /R N STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this P� day of `'��- , 20 i , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and Sally J Bulleit, single person, (the "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Properly Owner is the owner of Lot 10, Block 010, Subdivision Browndale Park, having a street address of 4650 West 44th Street, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14 -7. C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2622 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2622 for the amount of 4150.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,1150.00 against - the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14 -7. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14 -7, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 PROPERTY, OWNER: ally J Ile, it STATE OF MI NESOTA ) COUNTY OF ...Z� 1 (SS. e ftoingin J ae as by o d before me this day of, 204 ' AW NOTARY PUBLIC r� SHARON M. AWSON @NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOrTq �hfcommlrsslr�r��s,�i.�t,aots . CITY OF EDINA BY:' James B. Hovland, 'Mayor t; AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) •(ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Managerof the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:sm • o� /te tq AGENDA ITEM V. A. Joe Abood General Manager Braemar Golf Course [—] No packet data Oral presentation Information coming To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: June "Speak Up, Edina" Report o Le �o • ,�roRPOR/`TE� • 1868 Agenda Item #: V. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Action Requested: Receive report on June 2014 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about conservation incentives Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014 -2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUp.Edina.org. In June 2014, the discussion topic centered on conservation incentives. In this online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • If the City offered a financial incentive for conservation, such as water conservation, solar panels, etc., would you take advantage of such a program? Why or why not? • What types of upgrades should be incented? • Why type of incentive program would you support? For example, low- interest loans, property assessments, rebates or refunds, or something else. • How would you propose such a program be funded? The discussion was open for comments between May 30 and July 3. During that time, 23 comments were made. Additionally, 594 people visited the site 832 times, garnering 2,786 page views. About 45 percent visitors to the site during that period were from Edina (according to their internet provider). The discussion was promoted through various means, including a press release, Facebook, Twitter and NextDoor posts, City Extra messages. Attached are the comments on this topic. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Sneak W. Edina! U • HOM Discussions SijnWM • Ideas • Sievs Email ------ - - - - -- — - -email address... Pascword password... or, 3i Connec Stgn In Like ( Tweet Share aii EI oe • �COlil'(y1t1�1�• r BkiH This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Conservation Incentives The City is interested to find out how the community feels about incentives for conservation. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics wig be compiled and given to the City Council as informational only. 4 Topics 75 Answers Closad 2014-07 View Discussion Topic: Incentives If the City offered financial incentive for conservation, such as water conservation, solar panels, etc., would you take advantage of such a program? Why or why not? 5 Responses 5 Responses � s Joel Stegner 29 days ago It really depends on what program the city wants to offer. I can see that the program might be directed toward homeowners - in other words, the more affluent members of the Edina community - who would have the financial capacity to make a major investment in solar panels. While I once owned a home, I now We in a condo where association fees pick up things hike water and heat. If I turn down the thermostat, it has no direct impact on those fees. I think that you should favor conservation programs that are potentially of benefit to the widest population, particularly on those households on fixed or low incomes that struggle more with their monthly bills. Below PH suggest what those programs might be. 0 Supports comment... !• Reply to Joel Stegner Min Hutchens 27 days ago This should not be about you (Joel, or any one person) wasting as much or little as you want and affecting your cost But rather how to incentive the public to move in a more sustainable way for f rt re generations to live on the planet Here is how I would do it, electricity right now it is cheaper to finance a solar array then pay for coal and nuclear (Xcels energy nine), everyone and your association should have solar. Want to save water, elerni iate lawns and plant perrma- culture, polyculhre plants of food bearing ores, or raise the cost ofwater to increase conservaton quickly the profits could fund other sustainable projects. Incentives for recycling, city wide composting and programs focused on waste reduction, repairing, reusing and ucycing, with cradle to cradle. being the norm for all products sold in Edina- Reduce traffic, focus on bike lanes and non -car forms of transportation, have EV, bus, and alternative fuel mix incentives or as Paris is doing pay people to ride their bikes(health and environmental benefits). Changing behaviors are difficult we have to educate the youth and have them talk their parents in to thirrl®g less about themselves and more about the planet Demonize large houses, and teach about the waste involved with construction and the material loss, and embodied energy of tearing down perfectly good little louses to make gamt wasteful ones, and living with less rather then consuming as match as possible would be a good start 1 Support Joel Stegner 26 days ago I actually agree with mach ofyour agenda long-term. What Pm taldrig about behavior change aimng the most Edina residents possible, particularly directed to those who based on their financial situations are least able to change their lifestyles to live "green" What Edina needs to do are small projects that impact a lot ofpeoplc and are highly visible first, to create an appetite fDr more of what you are talking about 0 Supports ;comment... - - - • . - . Reply to Joel Stegner 'comment... Reply to Tim Hutchens Joel Acker 26 days ago We live in an apartment but would definitely take advantage of any programs that the city could offer that would apply not only to home owners but also to renters living in Edina. 0 Supports comment... - -. _.. -- - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -� I Reply to Joel Acker page Render 16 days ago We'd certainly look at any programs the city would offer. Whether we'd partake in them depends. From the citys standpoint, it seems that it would make sense to offer incentives if there was some relatively direct benefit to the city. For example, if the city can benefit by reducing water usage (because, for example, maybe a new well doesn't need to be built), providing residents with water - conservation benefits makes sense. rd not be as likely to favor incentives that are there for just the general good. Seems We the state and the federal government should cover that 0 Supports comment... Reply to Dave Bender Sign Up Connect .email address.._ - - -_ _ sign Up Participants .. i i Ideas In Action Bike Lanes Edina just hired someone to represent existing residents who are dealing with redevelopment issues ... we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassment Remove bushes on 42nd St. concealing Weber Park Portable 'Path Flooded" Sign at Bredcscn Path Flooded Sign at Bredesen Park Speak Up. Edina! U HOTM • Discussions Sign Id WPM • Surveys EmaO ,emali address... -.:W. . ---- - - - - -- - - - -- Password !password... Or, SiJAMMAVA nnect Sign In Like I_ Tweet Share 9�A' oe ISBN This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SAARE your feedbacks ► POST your ideas( ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Conservation Incentives The City is interested to find out how the community feels about incentives for conservation. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be compiled and given to die City Council as infortrational only. 4 Topics 15 Answers Dosed 2014 -07-04 View Dscrssion Topic: Types ofURgrades What types of upgrades should be invented? 4 Responses 4 Responses t � Joel Stegner 29 days ago I think that one thing that would have energy and reduce our chys carbon blueprint is getting people out of their cars for short trips. This is not possible with the very lutmed number of side walks and bike- fiiendly streets in the city. I live in the Colony, a multi -unit development 2 -3 blocks north of Southdale Shopping Center and east of Fairview Southdale Hospital There is a concentration ofthe fixed income, low income population I mentioned earlier. If one drives through our neighborhood, one will see a few people wanking in the streets, because we have a very incomplete network of sidewalks - and when it comes to major streets (France, 66th and Xerxes/York, a limited number of sidewalks. Particularly in the winter, the only safe way to get to Southdale Shopping Center is by car - so of course, few people walk. Ldkewise, there is no satin way to walk to the hospital Should our local residents be expected to drive 2 -3 blocks and pay to park in a hospital ramp? No. I would suggest that budding a more complete network ofsidewalks so people can walk would be a energy conservative practice in which all our residents would benefit in many ways - the walkers saving money and getting more exercise, the drivers dealing with less congestion because the walkers aren't driving Titre City needs to expand its thinking Another example would be older people on limited incomes who night even require fuel assistance in the winter. Many ofthem live in older lorries that are not adequately insulated or have energy inefficient furnaces and appliances. I believe that the City should focus its efforts on the most needy population - so they are not wasting money they don't have very much of things Ike home heating. Along the same line, energy usage would definitely be reduced ifpeople would use more energy efficient light bums. These light bulbs save money in the long run, but are expensive up front, which means that those with higher incomes are best able to acquire them I believe that Xcel has had special incentive programs for these light bums. The City might want to partner with Xcel to improve access for these bums for its low income residents. What I'm suggesting is that the City should get out of the mindset of providing financial incentives to its most affluent households to save energy, because they are in the best position to afford them on their own, but should focus its effiirts on programs that serve as many people as possible and focus on those who don't have the financial means to make the upfront investments to lower their energy costs. 1 Support Joel Acker 26 days ago I agree with your comiment about not providing financial incentives to the affluent community niity who can afford these things on their own. 0 Supports comment. . ~ I (comment... Joel Acker 26 days ago Reply to Joel Acker Reply to Joel Stegner Electric velficle purchases should be invented. Driving is one of the worst things we do for the environment and for the health of our comity. We five in an apartment near France Avenue and it is sickening the amount of dust that accumulates in our apartment m just one day when we have the windows open. That dust is largely from all the pollution of the traffic on France. The city could begin to offer a program to reduce the costs associated with getting started with an electric vehicle as well as promoting their benefits. Websites like: DrivelfectricMN.org & organizations Ike PhyjnConnect (www.phmbconnectcoraO could help the city to develop such programs. I would highly encourage the city to work with the owners ofthe apartment complexes throughout the city to get them to encourage their residents to look at electric vehicles and to get the budding owners to support plug -m vehicles. I would also target the apartruent building owners to encourage them to conserve energy by doing things Eke replacing older appliances for their residents and other programs. At our complex they are gradually going through the apartments and replacing all the appliances and remodeling the kitchens, bud then they greatly increase the rent Perhaps the city could offer incentive programs to offset the cost for the budding owners ofbuying those appliances so that poorer apartment - dwelling residents won't get hit with the bill. 0 Supports comment... ......... ......... ... ....... ... . ........ . .............................. .._A I Reply to Joel Acker r ffiv-x 15 days ago City of Edina has its Bands full rebuilding the streets and infrastructure of the cor r.mm ity. We lack sidewalks to safely walk (or bicycle) to close by services. Do we need hours of discussion about tax incentives which rn g t duplicate federal and state,progranis7 0 Supports comment... Reply to Kw x Sign Up Connect !email address... Sign Up Participants I N- IN 1 1 Ideas In Action Edina just hired someone to represent existing residents who are dealing with redevelopment iss<nes ... we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassment. Remove bushes on 42nd St. concealing Weber Park Portable 'Path Flooded" Sign at Bredesen' Path Flooded Sim at Bredesen Park Recent Activity Jordan Gn7genbacb answered a Discussion Jordan GAgenbach answered a Discussion Speak Up. Edna! L_J � • Discussions Sign • Feral • Swvevs Email - - - :email address... Password password... or, Segftlah — - -- nnect Slgn In Luce �o Tweet] Share ;oI �o� e e W Q 0 This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on airy of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideasl ► JOIN the discussionl Discussion: Conservation Incentives The City is interested to find out how the community feels about incentives for conservation. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be compiled and given to the City Council as informational only. 4 Topics 15 Answers I Closed 2014-07 -04 View Discussion Topic: How to Provide Incentives What type of incentive program would you support? For example, low - interest loans, property assessments, rebates or refunds, or something else. 4 Responses 4 Responses dod Steener 29 days ago In tems of an improved network of sidewalks in the city, I believe that currently the property owner is assessed directly for sidewalk improvements. Frankly, sidewalks are lice roads - a public service. The individual home or business owner generally isn't the greatest user of the sidewalk, but members of the general public. The disconnected system of sidewalks in Edina essentially farces people to move fromthe sidewalk to the street to the sidewalk to the street to get around the city. As I've observed driving around the city, it is extremely dangerous when people cross major streets in Edna, as crosswalks markings are missing or so worn that they cannot be seen. The city is introducing timed walk signs with stop lights and even when there are crosswalks, drivers do not appear well educated to the rights of walkers. As for the sale of lights, a bask; couponmg system where people get immediate rewards gives the energy aware customer immediate gratification. Rebates essentially are often unused, because of the extra steps involved in using them. Low interest loans really are appropriate if Edina wants only a few of its citizens to pursue conservation in a big way, as have more of its citixns pursue it in smaller ways. Edina can also extend its spending by entering into partnership with energy companies who also have money to spend on conservation. And the city can look at other issues (Ike airplane nose) if it wants to get into home insulation program for low income households - where the insulation can reduce noise levels and hold in the heat. I Support Joel Acker 26 days ago I agree that low - interest loans only benefit a few people in a large way. A program that benefits a large number ofresidents in a smaller way would be much more meaningful 0 Supports comment... lcomment... I I ❑1 Joel Acker 26 days ago Reply to Joel Acker Reply to Joel Stegner Rebates or refunds would be great for programs geared toward apartment building owners. Perhaps the city could offer tax incentives to building owners if they can cut down on their overall resource use. The city could perhaps outline a program where if an entire complex reduces its water, gas or electricity use by a certain threshold within a certain period then they'll receive a specified tax break. Then, building owners will look at how they can influence resident behavior and how they can improve their buildings to qualify for the tax break. And electric vehicle purchase program that gives homeowners a one -year break on their property taxes or a property tax rebate could also be effective, but then you'd need some way for renters to also receive a rebate as well. 0 Supports Joel Stegner 26 days ago I believe in Edina, taxi service is probably predominantly from people's resident to the airport and for the older population to medical and other appointments. The shared car and ride concepts that are in use in major cities could make it possible for some Edina residents with limited need to drive to avoid the cost of owning a car. 0 Supports Speak Up. Edna! Home • Discussions Sign Ideas Wm • Surveys Entail !email address... - Pascword� - - _ -- - — ipassword... or, ft ft" onnec Sign In Like fl (a __ Tweet] Share Ltd 1 11 Vj O •'��bR►'Clli� ^�v • ,sue This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Conservation Incentives The City is interested to find out how the commmmity feels about incentives for conservation Note: The City is not proposing a change at this tine. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be comp0ed and given to the City Council as informational only. 4 Topics 15 Answers Closed 201407-04 View Discussion Topic: Fundin How would you propose such a program be funded? 2 Responses 2 Responses M, Joel Stegner 29 days ago What needs to be avoid would be use of general tax revenues to mostly subsidize high income households that have the financial means to take on major conservation project The City can also avoid expenditures altogether if it modifies its building code standards to require the use ofhigh efficient appliances and building designs that don't waste energy in new construction. For water use, it could change the way it charges for water to have higher costs for households that based on community nor s have very high uses of water - e.g. those houses with lawn watering systems that over water or being poorly designed put a lot of their water into the street and sewer system To the degree possible, the city should partner wkh companies that sell energy or appliances to upgrade the energy/water use efficiency of all households. If these companies can save money through conservation, they may be wilfmg to help fimd I I Support Joel Acker 26 days ago The idea of a tiered water billing system sounds excellent. In some states that is how electricity use is billed, the more you use, the higher your price per kWh Water use could be billed similarly. This would work to encourage conservation since homeowners would know that running their sprinkler system all the time will now cost them more than in the past. The increased water revenue from this program could then be used to pay for other programs, such as electric vehicle incentives or energy efficient appliance purchase incentives. 0 Supports comment... comment... Sign Up _CDrinect jemail address... _ Sign Up Participants Ideas In Action Bike Lanes Reply to Joel Acker - . .. • -4, 1 Reply to Joel Stegner W , Conservation Incentives /� City Staff from City of Edina Should the City provide incentives to homeowners for conservation upgrades? Tell us what you think on Speak Up, Edina as part of our year -long discussion series! http://bit.ly /lnxeZex Shared with City of Edina In General REPLY 8 ' * Bob, Josh and Donna thanked you Jonathon C. from Valley Estates 23 Jun Incentives would be nice for rain gardens, water barrels, compost bins ... sign me up. Thank Remove Sara thanked Jonathon Louise S. from Indian Hills Please explain what °conservation upgrades'" might encompass? Do you mean environmental related activities like erosion control? Habitat planting like native grasses and plants? I thlnkthatyou need to clarify the question to get a valid response. rind, you might consider coordinating the CityAs Incentive program with that of the watershed districts. Yes, itwould be greatforthe Cityto Incentivize residents to be conservation role models. The City could come upwith a short list, maybe 6, conservation practices. Such a list might include a commitment 1. to keep the nearest storm drain free of leaves and debris 2. to stop using herbicides to rid lawns of dandelions forthe sake of native bees, and reducing their lawn fertilizer regime to decrease nitrates In their yards. 3. to -have a plan to ridtheir properties of buckthorn. 4. to Increase native platings for bird andwildlife 5. to reduce the amount of salt that they put down for ice control. 6. to encourage residents to mentor at least 1 young person in their conservation efforts. Nloney Is not the only thingthat could be usedto Incentivize people. What about a plaque or sign that identifies a home as being part of the'Edina Conservation Corp'? Thank Remove Sara and Reema thanked Louise 23Jun City Staff from City of Edina 24 Jun Louise, Thanks for your comments! Thats a good question about what 'conservation upgrades" encompass. It really could be anything big or small, from switching to CFLs or LED lighting, Installing solar panels, replacing old windows with energy efficient ones, installation of a rain garden, etc. The questions are meant to be open - ended, asking what kinds of activities should be Incented, and to what extent? Should It be offering LED lights for a discounted price? Providing a low Interest loan for a higher cost project? Providing grants to pay for part of other projects? Non - monetary Incentives are another good idea to keep in mind. Thanks forweloh!no in! 23 Jun David F. from Goff Terrace Heights 2a .Jun I don't understand this attempt at environmentalism when the city doesnt enforce state mandated erosion control at construction sites and allows mature trees to be cut down. The city eliminated a ... ;View more Thant; Remove Reema thaned David iAM Josh J. from Broo Niew Heights 2a Jar I think its an interesting idea. I would look at doing more green projects around my house if there was an incentive (other than I knowthey benefit the environment). I think it would be more beneficial to the community as a whole if it focused on exterior applications like rain gardens, native grass plantings, etc. Thank Remove John S. froni The Heights 24 Jur, LA Some homes In E6rna might still have fuel oil furnaces, maybe the City could workvAth the EPAto offer incentives to upgrade to natural gas. I thinkthere might be State money available to even pa} forthe rem%al of oldfuel oil tanks. Itwould be interesting to know how many homes still use fuel oil. Thank Remove Shea H. from Braemar Hills 24 JLr P.ppreaate the attempt at conservation which I'm afan of but David's point is spot on which is the factthatthe government isn"t good at doing It Sounds like another government boondoggle and excuse to, raise taxes. No thanVs. Thank Remove Patricia P. from Chowen- Strachauer Park 24 Jun l'd be all for an incentive Thank Remove of flu • ,MCORPOR K, \ 1888 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion Date: July 15, 2014 Information ❑ Subject• • Public Hearing; Preliminary Rezoning, Lot Area and Width Variances, Building Coverage Variance and Side Yard setback Variance at 3923 49th Street, Mathias Mortenson, Resolution No. 2014 -79. Action Requested: Planning Commission Recommendation: On June 25, 2014 the Planning Commission made a motion to approve the requested rezoning and variances. The motion failed on a 4 -4 Vote. The Planning Commission further recommended approval of the rezoning contingent on the approval of the variances as requested. Vote: 7 Ayes & I Nay. (See attached minutes.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the rezoning and variances per the findings in the Planning Commission staff report and Resolution No. 2014 -79. If the Council wishes to approve the rezoning and variance; authorize staff to draft a resolution approving the rezoning and variances to be brought back at the August 4th Council meeting. Information / Background: Mathias Mortenson is proposing to tear down a single - family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. (See property location on pages AI —A5, and the applicant's plans and narrative on pages A6 -A33 in the Planning Commission Staff Report.) The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ A Preliminary Rezoning from R -I, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; ➢ Building Coverage from 25% to 32 %; and ➢ Side yard setback Variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. The applicant went through a Sketch Plan review with the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the minutes from each review on pages A34 —A37.) In an effort to address some of the concerns raised, the applicant has eliminated one of the drive entrances to the site, and the handicap accessible walkway to sidewalk to the front of the house. This reduced the impervious surface on the lot. (See side by side comparison on page A8 -A9.) The applicant has also slightly reduced the footprint of the structure, City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 eliminated the front yard and side yard setback variances, and the retaining wall setback variance. The mass and scale of the structure architecture of the structure remain generally the same. (See pages A 18—A 19.) The applicant narrative indicates a building coverage variance from 25% to 28 %, however, the patios were not taken into account. City Code requires patios to be included in the building coverage calculation, with a 200 square foot credit. The patios total 648 square feet, therefore, 448 square feet must be added to the building coverage. The building coverage with the 448 square feet added is 32 %. The applicant is proposing to use pervious pavers as part of the patio. While the pervious pavers would assist in site runoff, the city does not have an Ordinance provision to reduce impervious surface requirement with the use of pervious pavers. Variances would still be required for lot coverage even if full credit were given to the pervious pavers. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the June 25, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Memo from the environmental engineer • Planning Commission Staff Report, June 25, 2014 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-79 DENYING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM R -1 TO R -2; LOT AREA AND WIDTH VARAINCES; BUILDING COVERAGE VARIANCES; AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mathias Mortenson is proposing to tear down a single - family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. 1.02 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; 2. Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; 3. Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; 4. Building Coverage from 25% to 32 %0; and 5. Side yard setback Variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. 1.04 On June 25, 2014 the Planning Commission made a motion to approve the requested rezoning and variances failed on a 4 -4 Vote. 1.05 On June 25, 2014, The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning contingent on the approval of the variances as requested. Vote: 7 Ayes & 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The variance criteria are not met. 2.02 There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property owner does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the zoning ordinance. It is not reasonable to deviate from the ordinance requirements when there is nothing unique about the property that justifies the variances. The need for variances is caused by the applicants desire to build such a large two - family dwelling on the site. 2.03 Reasonable use of the property exists with the two -story single family currently located on the property. 2.04 The size of the proposed structure creates the need for the lot coverage variance, and the side yard setback variance. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-79 Page 2 2.05 The City has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage when tearing down a home (single - family home or duplex) and building a new one. 2.06 Proposed building coverage would be nearly triple the building coverage that exists today with the single family home. Section -1 DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the preliminary rezoning; lot area and width variances; building coverage variance and side yard setback variances proposed'at 3923 49th Street are denied. Adopted by the city council' of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 15, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 15, 2014, and as recorded.in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. City Clerk S MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 25, 2014 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call: Scherer, Schro er, Lee, Kilberg, Olsen, rr, Platteter, Forrest Members absent from roll: Halva APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENVA Commissioner Schroeder moved approval of th e Carr seconded the motion. All voted /aye;m n c Chair Staunt on informed the Commisa iter West 49th Street have been continued nning IV. 25, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner A. 6500 France Avenue and C. 3932/34 nission meeting of July 9, 2014. A. Minutes of the RegulapNeeting of the Edina Plan ninILCommission June 11, 2014 Commissioner Lee mov approval of the June 11, 2014, meeting tes. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion All voted aye; motion carried. rX V. Jim and Lori GrotZ 5913 Park Place, addressed the Commission VI. PUBLIC HEARING B. Preliminary Rezoning and Variances. Mathias Mortenson. 3923 West 49th Street, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Appearing for the Applicant Mathias Mortenson Page 1 of 11 Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify the process. Planner Teague responded that the rezoning request is a two -step process; variance is one. ADDlicant Presentation Mr. Mortenson addressed the Commission and explained since the meetings before both the Commission and Council he revised the plans to the greatest extent possible. Mortenson explained the subject site is unique; pointing out it is located next to a 4 -story apartment complex with parking lot, abuts commercial properties to the south and the block the subject site is located on contains mostly R -2 zoned properties (15); not R -1(4) as the subject site is currently zoned. Continuing, Mortenson also noted the subject site is narrow, and is "cradled by a Height Overlay District ", reiterating the subject lot is one of the few in the City with such unusual conditions. Mr. Mortenson further reported that he has two goals which in his opinion align well with the City's housing goals as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Goal #1 is accessibility and Goal #2 is sustainability. Mortenson expanded on those goals. In conclusion Mortensen thanked the Commission for their time reiterating in his opinion this project is a plus for the City. Discussion Commissioner Carr indicated that she has concerns about safety as it relates to the retaining wall. She stated that wall is very high and would be dangerous; especially for children if not adequately secured. Mr. Mortenson responded that his intent would be too screen the wall with a strip of landscaping. Carr stated she believes a fence is also warranted. Mortenson responded he would be receptive to installing a fence as well as landscaping. Commissioner Scherer stated she agrees with Commissioner Carr's comments on the retaining wall and suggested adding a wrought iron fence for safety, adding she believes it would blend well with the landscaping elements. Continuing, Scherer said she wasn't concerned with the lot coverage issue. She stated in her opinion this is a transitional neighborhood and the use of the lot provides buffer to the R- I zoned properties. Scherer asked for clarification on the lower level of the proposed double. Mr. Mortenson explained that the lower level space accommodates the needs of an aging population. He explained that the potential owner is not only interested in living in one of the units because the design lends itself well to "one level" living with multiple levels; it also meets a need not easily found in Edina. Mortenson said all necessities (kitchen, bath, laundry, etc.) would be provided on the ground level and an elevator would connect the below grade parking to the upper two floors. All features on the "main" level would meet ADA requirements with the basement level serving as quarters for in -home care. Commissioners expressed some concern over the internal makeup of the units because there is the potential for "multiple dwellings" because of the interior configuration. Mortenson said his intent and the intent of the owner is to rezone the property to R -2, double dwelling unit district. The intent is not to exceed that; it's not a request for a PRD. Mortenson further stressed the intent is two dwelling units period. Mortenson said the configuration relates well to one level living with the property owner able to have guests and a live -in care giver. Concluding, Mortenson said a neighbor in the area has expressed interest in one of the units. Page 2 of 11 Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Mary Quinlivan, 3922 West 49th Street addressed the Commission and explained that she really likes the aesthetics of the building; especially the front. Quinlivan said in her opinion the two recently constructed doubles are way out of scale for the neighborhood. She acknowledged they are beautiful buildings; however, they are too large with overly exposed garage doors. Concluding, Quinlivan reiterated her support. She likes the look of the building and is impressed with the property owners of sustainability goals. Chair Staunton acknowledged a -mails received on the project. Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the subject; being none, Commissioner Scherer moved to closed the public hearing. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Discussion Commissioner Platteter stated he wasn't opposed to rezoning this site from R- I to R -2, adding to him it makes sense. Platteter said what he struggles with is the lot coverage. Platteter said he just thinks the building as proposed is too large. Commissioner Olsen agreed with the comment from Commissioner Platteter on lot coverage. She further added that she believes the project is honorable, the sustainability element of the project is good; however, she believes it's too large. Commissioner Carr commented she isn't troubled by the lot coverage adding this lot is difficult to work with and she supports the rezoning; it makes sense. Commissioner Scherer reiterated she too is less concerned with lot coverage and is swayed by the unique location of this lot (parking lots on two sides of the lot). Continuing, Scherer said she likes the "look" of the home(s) from the front street; it blends well, especially without the introduction of large garage doors. Commissioner Lee stated she agrees the applicant has great design and sustainability ideas; however, is concerned with the mass of the proposed structure on a lot this size. Lee said she is concerned with drainage; suggesting that the applicant retain a civil engineer to review the drainage. She also said in her opinion the roof pitch is too high, adding there may be other solutions to pursue. Continuing, Lee said she appreciates the unique use of the home(s) and that it responds to the life cycle living as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Concluding, Lee stated she continues to believe if constructed as proposed there is too much "building" on this R- I lot. In response to Commission comments Mr. Mortenson said he would retain both a civil engineer and landscaping architect if the rezoning was approved. He said he worked very hard to keep the lot coverage at a minimum. With respect to building height a certain height is needed to provide the optimum angle for the solar panels. Commissioner Forrest said she has a concern that the height of the building to the east and the potential for height to the south of the subject site may compromise the solar panels. Forrest also Page 3 of 11 stated in her opinion that the size of the proposed building is too much for this R- I lot. Concluding, Forrest stated rezoning the lot to R -2 isn't a problem; the size of the structure is. Chair Staunton asked Mortenson to clarify his reasoning for a two -story structure with basement. Mr. Mortenson explained the proposed layout of the doubles is to provide one level living space with flexibility; achieving life cycle housing. The "main" level provides complete one level living and the flexibility of have guests visit and /or stay and to provide an area for a live -in care provider. Mortenson also reported that square footage is important in providing this flexibility. Commissioner Carr stated this request in any other location would give her pause; however, this lot is unique, reiterating rezoning the lot to R -2 makes good sense. Commissioner Scherer agreed with Carr, adding square footage is important in providing the right balance in living space, adding potential owners do desire space. Commissioner Schroeder questioned why 25% is the magic number. He pointed out no one can really perceive the difference. Schroeder said this proposal could have runoff issues; however, if a Civil Engineer "signs off' on the project as presented he has no issue with the lot coverage variance. Commissioner Lee reiterated it the size of the structure on the lot that's an issue for her. Her concern regards drainage and changing an R- I Lot to an R -2 Lot would impact drainage patterns. Commissioner Staunton reiterated in his opinion the R -2 rezoning is appropriate. He said it appears Mr. Mortenson has responded to the Commission and Council suggestions, adding if drainage issues are satisfied by a Civil Engineer he could support the request as submitted. Motion Commissioner Carr moved variance approval subject to submittal of a fence and landscaping plan that provides safety and minimizes the impact of the retaining wall. Approval is also subject to a civil engineer reviewing and approving a storm water and erosion control management plan and subject to permitting from the Watershed District. Carr further suggested that Mr. Mortenson ensure (in writing) that the lower level space of each unit is considered part of the structure and not an approved separate unit. Carr further moved that variance approval is contingent on final rezoning. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion: Planner Teague clarified that this request is a two -step process that would be heard again by both the Commission and Council for final approvals. Ayes Scherer, Schroeder, Carr and Staunton. Nay, Lee, Olson, Platteter and Forrest. Motion failed 4 -4. Commissioner Carr moved to recommend preliminary rezoning approval contingent on approval of the variances. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Olson, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton. Nay, Lee. Motion to rezone approved 7 -1. Page 4 of 11 A discussion ensued on what would happen if the site was approval and the double wasn't built; would the single family home be nonconforming. Planner Teague explained it would be nonconforming; however, if rebuilt as a single family home it would have to be built exactly as is today. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 7200 France Avenue Planner Teag informed the Commission a request to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop th .51 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue has been made. Teague s 'd the applicant is re esting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existin ice building on the site, d redevelop it with a six and four -story mixed use dev pment project that would in de the following: ➢ 170 unit artment (6 stories) (20% affordable) ➢ 25 units ON ow housing. (4 stories) ➢ 45,500 squa feet of retail space including two r taurants. ➢ A two -level \area d parking ramp. Teague noted the retail spa located on the ance side of the project. Access to the residential po developmen ould be from 72 "d Street. Access to the retail portion ff of Franc venue. The existing vegetation and trees on the f the sit ould remain to provide screening from the residenthe we . To accommodate the request, three aments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — fr 4 store ➢ Housing Density, rom 30 unn ➢ Floor Ar/Rad — from .5 to A rezoning of all the prould then be i Development. to 6 stories. ,Der acre to 50. to PUD, Planned Unit Dean Dovolis DJR Architects and Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Cdkporation. Discussion Commissioner Lee asked what the zoning of the subject site is and if the existing building was non - conforming. Planner Teague responded the subject site is zoned POD, Planned Office District and the building is non - conforming. Teague said the site is proposed to incorporate elements of the mixed use zoning district. Page 5 of 11 DATE: June 25, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Chad Milner —City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 3923 49" Street West — Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the following ordinance sections: • Chapter 10, Article 4 — Demolition Permit Stormwater and Erosion Control (10 -106 to 10 -1 13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345) • Chapter 10 Article 17 — Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10 -710) • Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2 — Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 — Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department and assumes the attached documents were submitted for building permit review. A more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Two high priority comments are in bold. I. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: www.minnehahacreek.org/ 2. Site survey should follow the standard described in policy SP -005 -B included in the building permit application packet. 3. There are 6+ retaining walls in close proximity to the neighboring property to the west. 4'+ wall will require structural engineering. This configuration is atypical for this land use, and represents a hazard to personal safety. Practically, this wall may also require temporary easement or permission from the neighboring property to be constructed. Street and Curb Cut 4. It appears application may utilize existing drive entrance. If application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http: / /edinamn.gov /edinafiles /files /City Offices /Public Works /CurbCutApplication.pdf Sanitary and Water Utilities S. Underground parking ramp and large graded walk out "egress well," are very atypical for this land use. Both excavations lack positive surface drainage. This situation creates undue risk to sanitary infiltration and inflow. These areas should include either positive grade away from the foundation or be connect to drainage system that drains away. 6. Show utility connections. Storm Water Utility ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 7. The subject site front yard drains to 49h Street and is part of subwatershed MHN_71. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited. The downstream system also includes a runoff volume sensitive landlocked basin prone to flooding. 8. The subject site rear and side yard also drains to subwatershed MHS_58. This drainage path is through city property to the south and then to 49 '/2 Street West public system. 9. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following links: https:Hmaps.barr.com /edina/ and http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section= engineering water resource 10. Required storm water and erosion control precautions are described below. Site Storm Water Ordinance Chapter 10, article 4 - Demolition Permits And Building Permits For Single And Two Family Dwelling Units (Sec. 10- 110), states: For a building permit, the applicant must submit stormwater and erosion control plans prepared and signed by a licensed professional engineer. The plans must be approved by the City Engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation. Permit holder must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities may result in sediment laden stormwater runoff entering the inlet. The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must be an integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or obstructions. 11. A storm water management plan signed by a Professional Engineer is required: a. Mitigate increase volume to MHS_71. b. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District standards, if applicable. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 12. A grading and erosion control plan signed by a Professional Engineer is required. c. Provide erosion and sediment control precautions described under Edina City Code Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345). d. Identify on the plan the individual responsible for the cleanliness of the site and the maintenance of the erosion and sediment controls. e. Describe stockpile locations. f. Describe site access and precautions against undue soil compaction. g. Include provisions for temporary erosion control. h. Identify pollution prevention techniques that will be used in the case of temporary pumped discharge. i. Identify pollution prevention techniques that will be used for concrete washout, and hazardous waste storage and handling. j. Provide inlet protection for all storm sewer inlets downstream of the site within one block or as directed by the City. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 w9SN�1r� o� e a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 25, 2014 VI.B. Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Mathias Mortenson is proposing to tear down a single - family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. (See property location on pages Al —A5, and the applicant's plans and narrative on pages A6 -A33.) The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; ➢ Building Coverage from 25% to 32 %; and ➢ Side yard setback Variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. The applicant went through a Sketch Plan review with the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the minutes from eacli review on pages A34 —A37.) In an effort to address some of the concerns raised, the applicant has eliminated one of the drive entrances to the site, and the handicap accessible walkway to sidewalk to the front of the house. This reduced the impervious surface on the lot. (See side by side comparison on page A8 -A9.) The applicant has also slightly reduced the footprint of the structure, eliminated the front yard and side yard setback variances, and the retaining wall setback variance. The mass and scale of the structure architecture of the structure remain generally the same. (See pages Al8 —A19.) The applicant narrative indicates a building coverage variance from 25% to 28 %, however, the patios were not taken into .account. City Code requires patios to be included in the building coverage calculation, with a 200 square foot credit. The patios total 648 square feet, therefore, 448 square feet must be added to the building coverage. The building coverage with the 448 square feet added is 32 %. The applicant is proposing to use pervious pavers as part of the patio. While the pervious pavers would assist in site runoff, the city does not have an Ordinance provision to reduce impervious surface requirement with the use of pervious pavers. Variances would still be required for lot coverage even if full credit were given to the pervious pavers. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A single family home; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Easterly: Apartment building; zoned PRD -4, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Southerly: Vacant property (formerly Edina Realty); zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Guided Mixed Use, MXC. Westerly: A single story double dwelling unit; zoned R -2 Double- Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 8,816 square feet in size, and contains a two -story single family home. The site is elevated above the two- family dwelling to the west. (See pages A3 and A29.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Grading /Drainage /Utilities Low Density Attached Residential R -2, Double- Dwelling District The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans, and identified several concerns. (See memo on page A41.) Should the City Council approve the proposed project, the applicant would be required to address these concerns with revised plans as part of the Final Rezoning application. Please note that the grading plans were not done by a licensed professional engineer. This application predates that current application requirement. If the Planning Commission and /or City Council approve this project, it would be a Preliminary approval. A condition of approval should therefore, be that a grading, drainage and stormwater control plan, done by a licensed professional engineer, be submitted with the final rezoning application to be N considered by the Planning Commission and Council during final consideration. Proposed Floor Plans The plans show a lower level studio within each unit that could easily be designed as additional units within the structure. These two "studios" are separated from the rest of the living units. To access the upper units from these lower studios, a person would have to walk outside or through the garage. (See page A14.) Should the applications be approved, a condition should be added that these not become separate dwelling units. Compliance Table *Variance Required PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Rezoning from R -'l to R -2 is reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single - family and two- family dwellings. (See pages A4 and A22 -A32.) Two dwelling units.are the predominant uses on this block. City Standard (R -2) Proposed Building Setbacks 34.5 feet 15 feet 15 feet 35 feet 35 feet 15 feet 6 inches 5 feet 10 inches* 36 feet Front Side Side Rear Retaining Wall Setback 3 feet 4 feet Lot Width 90 feet 65 feet* Lot Area 15,000 square feet 8,816 square feet* Building Height 30 feet 28 feet Building Coverage 25% 32 %* *Variance Required PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Rezoning from R -'l to R -2 is reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single - family and two- family dwellings. (See pages A4 and A22 -A32.) Two dwelling units.are the predominant uses on this block. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided for Low Density Attached Residential. The proposed duplex would fit that category. Duplexes serve as a transitional land use area between the commercial properties to the south and the single - family residential area to the north. • Are the proposed Variances reasonable for this site? No. Staff believes that the proposed Variances are not reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The combination of all of the requested variances would result in a structure that is too large for this small parcel. 2. The applicant has not adequately addressed the concerns raised by the Planning Commission and the City Council during the sketch plan review of this request. Concern was raised in regard to the home fitting into the neighborhood. The Council stated that the height and lot coverage of the structure should be reduced. While the proposed home has been reduced in size, setback variances have been eliminated, driveways and sidewalks have been eliminated; however, the mass, scale and architecture of the home remains generally the same. The City has traditionally not granted lot coverage variances. No lot coverage variances have been granted for a tear down and rebuild of a single - family home or duplex. Concern was also raised in regard to the retaining walls and safety. The applicant has addressed the issue by eliminating one of the driveways, and moved the retaining wall four feet away from the side lot line. (See page Al2.) 3. The variance criteria are not met. Per state law and the Edina Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? No. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 4 the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the subject property. As demonstrated on page A4, the lot is the smallest lot on the south side of 49th Street. It is similar in size to the lots across the street, which contains single - family homes. However, the proposed home on this small lot would be too large for the site. The size of the proposed structure creates the need for a lot coverage variance, and side yard setback variances. As mentioned above, the city has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage. Therefore, staff believes the proposed home is not reasonable for the size of this small lot. The building coverage for the existing single family home and detached garage in the rear yard is 12 %. The proposed structure would more than double the building coverage for the lot, and far exceed the city code requirement. Reasonable use exists on the property with the existing single family home. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The circumstance of the undersized lot is not unique to this neighborhood. There are several undersized R -1 and R -2 lots on this block. (See page A3 -A4.) c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. The proposed structure is too large for this lot. No setback or lot coverage variances have been granted on any of the lots on this block, on which new duplexes have been built. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed Rezoning and Variances at 3923 49th Street. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The variance criteria are not met. 2. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property owner does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner 5 I prohibited by the zoning ordinance. It is not, reasonable to deviate from the ordinance . requirements when there is nothing unique about the` propert y that justifies the variances. The need for variances is- caused by the applicants _ desire to build such a large two - family dwelling on the site. 3. Reasonable use of the property exists with the two -story single family currently located on the property. 4. The size of the proposed structure creates the need for the lot coverage variance, and the side yard setback variance. 5. The City has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage when tearing down a home (single - family home or duplex) and building a new one. 6. Proposed building coverage would be nearly triple the building coverage that exists today with the single family home. Deadline for a city decision: July 15, 2014 4 45TH ST W _ _ W _ , U.1 _ - I� ? I _ _. 0 49THlST W ( 4 H ST W `_►. a 49 112 ST W _ 5 0TH S T IM S OTH ST W Lul _ 4 51STSTW�' - _. C 'f P::: LU 45 --._— Parcel 18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 A -T -B: ID: Owner Baker Bean Llc Market Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Residential Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft Code: a Map Scale: V = 400 ft. /NN Print Date: 1/14/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A 'Think- Green! 4809 4.51= 4813 4812 48 C, C 4817 4821 4817 M 480 C, 4825 4821 4824 4829 4833 j 4£32 4��_ 4- i 485 4830 - 4837 4836 4837 , 4829 4846 � 4�n 41 484-1 4841 4833 48 50 4845 4844 4845 -- I :W , 3938 , 3'332 _922 4845 4849 483; ' I 5 484 4853 4852 4853 i 4901� ._ 4900 490 4005 - - = 3945 3941 3937 3927 '_ 3923 3901 = 4905 ! 4904 4905 I Ilj 4909 4908 4L-Xj9 4912 4915 24 3948 3944 3936 3930 3918 4916 4917 4916. 4917 4921 4920 4921 49 1/2 ST v,+; 4924 4925 ! 4928 4929 24 24 ?4 4930 i i - 4932 49 33 24 74 3925 4936 4937 _ 4999 �. 4941 �z x 4948 4945 ii 24 41CC 3`31' 3924 ;922 3906 - I ' 3808 i 3724 x ;21'! `i' H ST L4' Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 A -T -B: ID: Print Date: 1/14/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Sale Residential Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Thin", Green! M gym. a!t ..✓��n��`'�+r� 'gin /�gr� d .� - -- -.W, -_ -T IL Parcel 18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 A -T -B: ID: Owner Name: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: Home- stead: Parcel 0.21 acres Area: 9,086 sq ft Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: A3 n Map Scale: 1" = 100 ft. Print Date: 1/14/2014 �i N This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think Green! C) w w a Rl� CD w Z O 1- 49TH ST W 48TH ST W a. w Q W U Z LL LL Legend 0 �w , ® �a Kw W�E S 0.q SEE SEE DETAIL D A IL ��neee T w > Q w U w 51STSTW w <1 1 I __j - cr - Q O ^ry 50th & France Zoning Map City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota �ct i i +e CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY v- W— V— v— V— V— V— I - \ , - V 15' DUCT" IRON PIPE WATERMIN 4 9 T H STR EET \WEST INV 11117.80 -SERVICE INV 1186.1 X 2 / $p 4;� 8 0 10 > > > > > x > — > > > > x > > > 9* V17REOIJ CLAY PIPE ',.594' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N8928'30"E 65.51 (66 PLAT) THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDI\nSION NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING N-1-1 OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. E -896- a97---- e- LEGEND: FOU D IRON MONUMENT SATER AN (AS NOTED) SERVICE UNES FROM CITY OF POWER ROLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR) ANITARY EDINA ENGINEERING DEPT. - NOT FIELD VERIFIED COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL sANIYARY SEWER MANHOLE lot DEClDVOUS,,TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) ---OVERHEAD UTILITY uNt- N ----WFTARY SEWER UNE 11.7 - _�NATURAL GAS LINE UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNE 2 STORY HOUSE #3223 _'-�WOO. —CE IFFE - 899.7 F CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE 2 L 0 V 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE 7.: BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. 3923 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 P.I.D.:18-028-24-14-0027 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 SQ. FT. 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. 79 L R t 'OIL 'A -'D', - 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2-11-2013 7t 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET C, WEST. ELEVATON 887.72 (NGVD) J!.' TRANSFORMER 2.6 HOUSE: 642 SQ. FT GARAGE GARAGE: 456 SO. Fr. CONCRETE: 1,704 SQ. FF. FIFIE - 897.7 TOTAL HARDCOVER: 2,802 SQ. Fr OR 31.5% S-7L�OVER) T A elf Ir 54, 'TI.EVCF . CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report v was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor Under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 59 - - - --W5 - - - - - - - - - -894 2�— SIGNED 65.78 6 T-1. W. V.� N.t., M Pnf..1" piss-w rft P...n. .,r ES5 NORTH UNE OF THE JOB 1 2013005 ISSUED; 2-21-2013 _SOUTHER 177.5 DRAWN W.. Tw�- REV. PREPARED FOR: FEET OF LOT 32 AS MATHIAS MORTENSON MONUMENTED SCALE: I" - 10 FEET 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH VAN NESTE SURVEYING MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55405 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES aS VVILDHURST ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 v S PHONE (952) 686-3055 TOLL-FREE i�� (886) 473-0120 WWW.VANNESTESURVEYING.COM SHEET I OF I 4�' PROJECT INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a new 2 -story double dwelling unit on 49th Street. The location is one block north of 50th and France on a street that predominantly consists of double dwelling units. The lot is currently zoned R -1, thus requiring a re- zoning to R -2. In February, this project was brought before the Planning Commission and the City Council. In addition a draft staff report was completed in March. This re- submission addresses to the greatest extent possible the various issues raised by those three entities. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The property at 3923 49th Street is highly unusual. First, it is a single- family lot situated.on a street that is predominantly double dwellings. More critically, it is adjacent to a high- density 4- story apartment building, two commercial properties,.and one double dwelling unit. This sets it apart from any other lot on 49th Street and, indeed, from most other lots throughout the city. In addition, it is cradled by a Height Overlay District that allows adjacent properties to build up to 48' high. A thorough survey of the city and its Height Overlay Districts (See Attachment A), reveals that there are only eight other residential properties in this situation and that, of those eight,'only two adjoin HOD'S of 48 feet or greater. While those final two are both zoned R -1, neither sits on a street that is predominantly comprised of R -2 lots. In other words; for a variety of. reasons, this lot is an anomaly, completely unique in the city. One other factor may also serve as an extenuating circumstance; and that is the recent purchase by the city of the commercial property to the south. The existing Edina Realty building has since been demolished and an expansion of the nearby parking ramp is currently being considered. While this may not have a direct bearing on how this proposal is evaluated, it does present a very real hardship to the owner, potentially diminishing the value of the property and casting shadows on the rear yard for much of the day. For these reasons, and others, it our hope that the City shares our view that our project's proposed variances ,are justified by the unusual conditions of the site. Finally, we submit two of our primary project.goals which we believe.align well with the City's housing goals as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan: PROJECT GOAL #1: ACCESSIBILITY The owner is seeking to provide a housing type,largely absent from the city's housing stock, one that accommodates the particular needs of an aging population. Although, the owner is driven by an interest in homesteading in one of the: units, the design also coincides perfectly with the city's own interests. According to the Comprehensive Plan "The challenge for the city is to adapt itself as a life cycle community to conform to the needs of a changing population" (13.40), and that change is principally happening to the +65 demographic where growth is expected to exceed 100% by 2030 (CP, p. 24). The proposed development would address exactly this challenge through a number of means: M, IIV1 �P REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF.EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 PROJECT INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a new 2 -story double dwelling unit on 49th Street. The location is one block north of 50th and France on a street that predominantly consists of double dwelling units. The lot is currently zoned R -1, thus requiring a re- zoning to R -2. In February, this project was brought before the Planning Commission and the City Council. In addition a draft staff report was completed in March. This re- submission addresses to the greatest extent possible the various issues raised by those three entities. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The property at 3923 49th Street is highly unusual. First, it is a single- family lot situated.on a street that is predominantly double dwellings. More critically, it is adjacent to a high- density 4- story apartment building, two commercial properties,.and one double dwelling unit. This sets it apart from any other lot on 49th Street and, indeed, from most other lots throughout the city. In addition, it is cradled by a Height Overlay District that allows adjacent properties to build up to 48' high. A thorough survey of the city and its Height Overlay Districts (See Attachment A), reveals that there are only eight other residential properties in this situation and that, of those eight,'only two adjoin HOD'S of 48 feet or greater. While those final two are both zoned R -1, neither sits on a street that is predominantly comprised of R -2 lots. In other words; for a variety of. reasons, this lot is an anomaly, completely unique in the city. One other factor may also serve as an extenuating circumstance; and that is the recent purchase by the city of the commercial property to the south. The existing Edina Realty building has since been demolished and an expansion of the nearby parking ramp is currently being considered. While this may not have a direct bearing on how this proposal is evaluated, it does present a very real hardship to the owner, potentially diminishing the value of the property and casting shadows on the rear yard for much of the day. For these reasons, and others, it our hope that the City shares our view that our project's proposed variances ,are justified by the unusual conditions of the site. Finally, we submit two of our primary project.goals which we believe.align well with the City's housing goals as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan: PROJECT GOAL #1: ACCESSIBILITY The owner is seeking to provide a housing type,largely absent from the city's housing stock, one that accommodates the particular needs of an aging population. Although, the owner is driven by an interest in homesteading in one of the: units, the design also coincides perfectly with the city's own interests. According to the Comprehensive Plan "The challenge for the city is to adapt itself as a life cycle community to conform to the needs of a changing population" (13.40), and that change is principally happening to the +65 demographic where growth is expected to exceed 100% by 2030 (CP, p. 24). The proposed development would address exactly this challenge through a number of means: M, REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 1. All necessities (kitchen, bath, laundry, etc.) would be provided for on a single level 2. An elevator would connect the below grade parking to the upper.two floors 3.. The main bathroom would include ADA accessible fixtures . 4. ADA turning radii and clearances provided where necessary 5. A basement studio that could serve as living quarters for in -home care. PROJECT GOAL #2: SLISTAINABILITY The project aims to achieve the highest standard of sustainability. It will incorporate rooftop solar panels that are expected to supply the entire electrical needs for both units. The building will also employ advanced framing techniques to achieve a 25% reduction in lumber corisumption and 5% increase in energy efficiency. Other more conventional sustainability measures will include high efficiency glazing, permeable pavers, materials with recycled content and low -flow fixtures, among others. REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 RESPONSE TO COUNCIL, COMMISION, PLANNING + NEIGHBORS: Below is a list of the concerns as expressed in the preliminary zoning review as stated in the City Council minutes, February 3, 2014: "(1.) Reconfigure the garages to require one driveway /curb cut and lower impervious surface; (2.) assure safety (guardrail /fence /landscaping) was sufficient along the retaining wall; (3.) refine the building plan to lower lot coverage /building height /hardscape; (4.) assure architectural elements and site components meet the essential character of the existing neighborhood; and, (5.) consider feasibility of repurposing the existing single - family home." 1A. RECONFIGURE GARAGES /PARKING LAYOUT CONCERN: The original design proposed two drives on either side of the lot accessing an underground garage. This raised two concerns: 1. It presented an excessive amount of driveway, asphalt and retaining wall to the street, rendering it distinctly uncharacteristic of the neighborhood 2. It created an 'island' effect that isolated the stretch of yard between the two drives from the fabric of front yards of adjoining residential properties RESPONSE: The East drive has been completely eliminated. This makes the proposed driveway consistent with other double dwelling units on the block. It also allows for more greenspace in the front yard and creates greater continuity with similar nearby front yards. Additionally, it resolves another concern that the stretch of curb between the two originally proposed drives would be too small to accommodate street parking. This is no longer the case. BEFORE AFTER 113. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE + STORMWATER RUNOFF CONCERN: The original design proposed an ADA accessible ramp to the front entry and a two - driveway parking layout that raised concerns regarding: 1. Amount of runoff directed to the city storm system, and 2. The amount of land dedicated to hardscape rather than landscape RESPONSE: Three things have been done to address the concern regarding impervious surface 1. Patio sizes were reduced �1 REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 2. The front entry steps were eliminated, and one 3. One drive was eliminated, Together, this resulted in considerable reductions in impervious surface as illustrated by the below study: EXISTING IMP. SURF. 1356 SF WALKWAY 333 SF _ -1782 SF - ORIGINAL PROPOSAL IMP. SURF. - 924 SF WALKWAY - 404 SF 1 � 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 GARAGE m 0 SF I I I I 1 1326 SF REVISED PROPOSAL IMP. SURF. - 543 SF WALKWAY - 340 SF 1 GARAGE m 0 SF 1 I LI -------------- - TOTAL COVERAGE =` 883 SF This reduction is in addition to other tools used to reduce hardscape and runoff: permeable pavers used at outdoor spaces and a rear -yard raingarden to collect runoff from the roof. 2. RETAINING WALL /SAFETY CONCERN: The retaining walls related to the below -grade drives generated the following concerns: 1. A wall that appeared overly high and /or stark from the street 2. The need for providing a guard rail for safety on one side 3. A sense that it effectively increased the perceived height of the building RESPONSE: Because one of the below grade drives was eliminated, the concern regarding the visual impact of the associated retaining walls has been partially alleviated. Additionally, the retaining walls for the remaining drive have been improved: 1. A stepped or canted wall for one side of the drive presents a softer surface 2. An ivy wall is proposed to cover the rear (or southernmost) wall 3. The exposed retaining walls will be stained or colored concrete so as to provide a warmer, more appealing aesthetic Al REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE-10, 2014 4.. A strip of plantings along one retaining wall will prevent any access to the wall edge. The wall ion the opposite side of the drive was essentially eliminated by manipulating the grading. 3A. SITE COVERAGE + BUILDING INTENSITY. CONCERN: The amount of site coverage was viewed as problematic based largely on two concerns: 1. It represents a higher intensity than is typical for the neighborhood, and 2. It reduces the amount of useable.exterior greenspa,ce. RESPONSE: The total site coverage has been reduced from 28.2% to 27.1 %. This is the most that could be reduced without compromising the goal -of providing an accessible form of single- floor living. We believe that.our site is unusual in a number of regards and that the proposed coverage does not represent an unduly intense amount given the context (see related Zoning Narrative). 3B. BUILDING HEIGHT CONCERN: The concern was that the retaining walls for the parking, together with the gable would render the building overly high for the neighborhood. RESPONSE: The peak of the gable and the elevation of the eave were lowered by one and a half feet. The retaining wall for the side drive was also treated in a way that would make it seem shorter and distinct from the building structure. A EXISTING CHARACTER ..CONCERN: The previous design did not specifically address this concern. The block does not. consist .of.any predominant style. The houses range from small single family bungalows at street level to larger homes atop hills; from simple low -rise, hiproofed duplexes to large, articulated -gable duplexes; and from one- and two -story dwelling units to a four story apartment building. Despite this lack of architectural continuity, there is still a predominant 'feel' to the street which is largely constituted, as in many other city neighborhoods, by a well - developed greenscape consisting of mature shade trees near the street and a variety of hedges, arborvitae, and smaller -scale landscaping near the homes. This revision proposes a landscaping similar to established patterns on the street, consisting of at least one medium -sized trees in the front lawn and smaller -scale shrubbery at the front of the house. S. REPURPOSE EXISTING BUILDING This idea was explored but is challenged by two significant issues: 1.) It is cost - prohibitive, and 2.) It requires a second site on which to situate the house REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 6. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS: NUMBER OF VARIANCES CONCERN: The re- zoning and the proposed design triggered multiple variance requests, suggesting the possibility that the use, or the design, or both were not viable at the site. RESPONSE: A number of moves were made, in addition to those stated above, that have made the building more compliant. 1. The building was shifted four feet to the south to eliminate a need for a rear yard setback 2. The building was shifted five feet to the east to eliminate a need for a side yard setback. This move also was made to be more sensitive to the residence to the west which otherwise may have had some portion of their lawn cast in shadow. Additionally, moving the house closer to the apartment building has no negative effects since there is only a surface level parking lot there. This has been confirmed in discussions with the proprietors of the apartments. 3. The side drive was shifted three feet to the east to eliminate a need for a zero lot line retaining wall. PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN - v - v M- w- w- W -8 6' DUCTILE IRON PIPE WAIERMAIN 49 iTH S TREET\DDIILLii\WEST RIM 894.10 _SERVICE INV 888.1 Scat' h fife s X R o 70 / I 9' NiREWS CL PoPE Q. \ X894/ $ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: eAY N89-28'30'E 65.51 I (66 PLAT) \ ,° /�- -893 THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING l'' =' =' • u'•� = = = = = NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. IH;'. ;6:;m, �DVanYa— .B•i- a =`�'.: �.6- :�- r•G:�'1 -',jam- $_'__"`?- .-ice•. -•. ., g•..•- -895- ___ ____ ____ __ -� - -�� _- "gZ�'•�,.^ - .- ` t. '�.' ^.; ^ ..'. I F(:FN OLI NO IRO' MONUMENT AS NOIID 896— POWER POLE (WITH GUT ANCHOR) - - z a I � d : �.:'•.:• ` -..: •� o COMMUNICATIONS PmI5TP1 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE W I 0 DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) N I I w I I -898- /CIA OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE -D — / 8'98 \ IWATERMAIN Z J ( I - '• "'•'•''' •l;1• ----SANITARY 30 L \ I R'.; 'i•: :i; y SEWER LINE I .. ... _.... r II I �NANRAL OAS LINE MOR '•.• I _� _ I i •_ G /UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE o•'.. 417 >�.;. �. ', EXTERIOR PROPOSED SPACE WITH /oWOOD FENCE F,RE+ DRAIN 1 I PERMEABLE AT o EAD I DUPLEX- NIT WITH I SURFACE, TYP. oat UNDERGROIJ PARKING n • ,' I L i EXISTING BTNMINOUS SURFACE I I c :•' I I( I I I I EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE X PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION / '' •: 11 J I I I e X EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 16" -61/2. 1 = 1 e /g91, EXISTING CONTOUR LINE I I •' 896 — — PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE _ I I �•$�: � a. i •.. `.: •:..• : NOTES: I 15' -61/2° I I 6' -1 ••' ; • 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE 1^ ecsn `''etelle:, BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. T' I EdES wu _IBANSFORUM e =1 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 \ ` — —899- — I I I .,.3 ': ,:,': , =•':.; 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 E \ — —892- — P.I.D.:18 -028 24 -14 -0027 5.BI —894- — — ' ' *.'• •• 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 SO. FT. / Z 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. —896-— 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2 -11 -2013 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW v �/ HEAw show covER CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET IN THIS AREA AT � WEST. ELEVATON = 887.72 (NGVD) T !) TIME OF FIELDWORK j I —897— — - _ vk� -' _ __ ____ _____ - -• - _ - -895 iP�� \896 _ r --89M1 -- N88'49'39 °W 65.78 / qd F NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 - FEET OF LOT 32 AS I PREPARED FOR: p° TIMBER RETAINING WALL NONUMENIED �� MATHIAS MORTENSON I 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH eP'` NEIGHBOR'S PARKING AREA I MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 I 1 I PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN - V— V— V— V — V— V— V V— V— V— V— V---TT{''' V— V— V— V— V— V— V— V— y. 6- DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERMAN� u 49 I TH �iTREETI \YVEST RIM - 694.10 X' _RIM - 867.80 Y - SERVICE INV - 686.1 °„ '� O T O — ) — ) > ) _7) ) > — > > ) ) > X > — ) > — _ 6' VITREOUS CLAY PIPE �i• \�89A' 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N8978'30'E 65.51 I (66 PLAT) \ „o'° �' �s>•— THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION / NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING ' • r' : • : • : • . •. u•.: •.: •.: •.:.•.:.•.: •. " •. NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. :pp.•_: •}. .011:'x- ?®f''� -Qfi:— :�6 �SLIpE ,� fi ,�'' b' � +. i..• �:6 t�•Gr`�<G�i� TO ��:?��•.. LEGEND, •1°4, 9 - _ FOUND IRON MONUMENT / \ \ (AS NOTED) 12, POWER PolE (VA711 GUY ANCHOR) / � ,moo •, : •.: •:' �: 93 I— —898— — — —69B -- I j =.`:.': o COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTIL 7'.'''':•.' ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Id I DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) —897- —697— $ I I OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE > =o" I $ IwATE6an I CONCRETE WALKWAY I I ^,•� 70 FOOT SETBAC • `• M' c II dal 5' -•: "t• :"- -'S4WTARY SEWER LINE •. r.. —� "'_FRENCH OVERHEAD HEAIN ; I • •.: •.: / NATURAL GAS LINE i DArovF>�EAO I d I $ I I ••. / 0 /UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE 0 T .. 2 •, _•• I $ I I I WOOD FENCE 8 8 n I I i EXISTING — MINOUS SURFACE I i PROPOSED TWO. STORY $ I - PATIO DUPLEX UNIT WITH PATIO I UNDERGRWNO PARKING I I I EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE I ®X PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION • /•, II 10.J 6.4 _ 6.4 10.4 I I •' •; ? I s : X EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR LINE $I I I Bob— PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE -•c � I .. � = I 111 1 �) ° o .. \ I'D IouARD /pp8.3 6.3 I 6 9.8 NOTES, 7, T FRENCH DRAIN OR CATCH I ••:. • -:. 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE PIA T I 0 I /' BASIEATss60Wlfl OF —\ P A T 110 ^ •p;EgjRi� BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. :.TRARSaoFwER I ® I ` ( w '"•. 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 30 Fool sETBAac —_ _ _ I ,',3' •:;':; 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA. MN 55410 € \\ 9� I — _889_ _ — — t: •..; �' P.I.D.:18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 �sJ� 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 SO. FT. 5.91 X894 \ ((�94 --t — —891— \ 1 Z.- • :_ 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2 -11 -2013 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW —893— — J I Ia r CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET ' WEST. ELEVATON 887.72 (NGVD) I -� I T I N� 5 AREA AT TVER \ \ \ —F" 894— I ' I TIME OF FIELDWORK / CER7IFlCATION I hereby Certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision \ �W — — _ 995— _ _ / / •,� and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor -�\ — — — — — — under the laws of the state of Minnesota. _ --. -894 // I 9GNED: ' .,, /•_j t'T/ i �✓ � r! -; f�� N88'49'39'W 65.78 - °9d $ T-b W. van N." u W' Pr s 1;8 nd ( NORTH LINE OF THE JOB f 2013005 lssum: 2 -28 -2014 SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET OF LOT 32 AS I DRAWN BM TWVN P.M. PREPARED FOR: ,y" ER RETMNINC WALL MONUNENTm a I $ I er., r. 1` - 10 FEET MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH a NEIGHBOR'S PARXING AREA I VAN NESTE SURVEYING MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 I PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES I 85 WILDHURST ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 V S PHONE (952) 686 -3OS5 TOLL-FREE FAX (668) 473 -0120 WWW.VANNESTESURVEYING.COM SHEET 1 OF 1 A`3 E- L 9: .y s� P m T G<O _ Stic Sp O '3 °uya s� uz1Oxx OHO zucm r��. 5 O $ L�xw7 Diem 3s +O _ 2 t .ipa3y Cy pD a a T DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA. MN ARCHITECT: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 56405 al 2-955-3745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14.9226 RE2OMM 19.06.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 A2.02 r� CP -1 PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVERS T -1 1"x 1" MOSAIC TILE ST -1 BOTTICINO MARBLE SILL AND TRIM. HONED FINISH S-1 STUCCO WITH FINE SAND FINISH. BY MATERIALS WORLD OR APPROVED EQUAL; COLOR: HARVEST GOLD, LIGHT WO-1 VERTICAL CEDAR SIDING; COLOR: MISSION BROWN R -1 THREE -TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE; COLOR:ONTA SP -1 SUNMODULE SOLAR PANEL, SW 250 MONO OR APPROVED EQUAL oware- rora:---- --- .----- . — DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 612-65SZ745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14.229 RE.OIAW 14.9.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST + WEST A4.02 O � 6 CP -1 PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVERS T -1 1 "x 1" MOSAIC TILE �sioev�u�. mar ST -1 BOTTICINO MARBLE SILL AND TRIM. HONED FINISH S -1 STUCCO WITH FINE SAND FINISH. BY MATERIALS WORLD OR APPROVED EQUAL; COLOR: HARVEST GOLD, LIGHT WD-1 VERTICAL CEDAR SIDING; COLOR: MISSION BROWN p R -1 THREE -TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE; COLOR:ONYX SP -1 SUNMODULE SOLAR PANEL, SW 250 MONO OR APPROVED EQUAL DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 61245SZ745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14.0220 REZONING 14.06.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST+ WEST A4.01 APARTMEN DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MAT [AS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 672ZS54745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14.0228 REZONING 14.06.10 RESUBMT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST +WEST A4.03 DOUBLE OWELLING 3927 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT' MAT HIAS MORTENSON 2429 6HERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 6125 -705 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 1402.26 REZONING 14,06.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN EXT. RENDERING LOOKING SOUTHWEST A4.03 old& t: ��0:77w; SnT b , Or DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA. MN ARCHITECT: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN $5405 512455JT45 CONTRACTOR DRAWN BY MHM 14.- RESUBMT KEY PLAN EXT. RENDERING LOOKING NORTHEAST (p�,771'E-L- ^4.06 AI■VA10:1612010: mmip- C� kL�� &"Val 17 IN �n &--sgr. SO ..Ail "MAD, lv� eg I *x 60 1 Y. TT it ppr- 14d 3923 49th Street Edina, MN 3949 49th Street White Oaks Apartment �V. w •M [ � y w t '�• �`. � '��'�• -°a,`E fie. M K 3923 -loch Street Edina. MN A? Awl 41 R t y• c 4 r - -- - .- IL I a 4, d Y C • - ¢ ,`y A �4t,' d 3920 49th Street Edina, MN 3925 49th Street x lu mi dw IL 292349thStreet Edina, MN 3900 49th Street i .fr'. Y 3923 49th Street Edina, MN 3923 49th Street P 7 3923 49th Street Edina, MN 3923 49th Street Edina, MN 39007 49th Street t fl Ir � - *,� 1y i!''.. •4`i). � 'ice. ��, 'J" �".,. �-�'-_ ' r .. � �� � ra°.., •� -. ...•�:7, ` �+�c.,�_ �! I: �41 ...y ) r�„- _..ice..- �f ��J�•�' M lr4jj� • � '`tom �- Or��•- � ° i 1 �� � *� J T'.,`ti+rr "mow-`. � �� � .,•., �� �" ,r "'NNN : .t o?l . roMo w 0 N lip, .64 AA :#jrvJl,4:w WW New Development across street 3923 49th Street Edina, MN Sj ` 761 WMW 3�r r _ w �116- I l lei il",- R -1 »7 R -1 `- PARK PARK -,,\ 1 p�. GOLFCOURSE R -1 - 1 Kri! !' %'a 0 1 A B. Sketch Plan Review — 3923 West 49th Street, Edina, MN Planner Teague informed the Commission they are asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down a single - family home and construct a double dwelling unit at 3923 49`h Street. The property is located adjacent to the 50`h and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the :City of Edina, and east of a four story apartment building. The applicant would seek a Rezoning to R -2 to allow the use; and several Variances. Teague explained that the applicant is proposing an energy efficient building that would include rooftop solar panels, a reduction in lumber costs due to framing' techniques, and a 5% increase in energy efficiency. Teague concluded that the proposedl zoning to R- 2•would be.:consistent with the R -2 zoning to the north and west. As demonstrated on page,A4, there are four sites zoned R- I on 49`h Street West, and thirteen sites zoned R -2. In eral, the duplexes on 49`h Street West serve as a transition of land uses'between the single-family homes to the north, and the commercial. area at 50 and. France.,: Appearing for the ARplicant Mathias Mortenson f Applicant Presentation Mr. Mortenson addressed the'.Comm.ission and explained his client is an empty nester that is ready..to.move out of the house-q'n'd move into a home that includes self - sufficient first floor living to serve their needs as they age. Mortenson also reported an elevator would b'e;added to allow:for access from the below grade parking to the upper floors. Continuing, with graphics" Mortenson pointed out the sustainable elements of the project to include rooftop solar panels, advanced framing techniques, high efficiency glazing, permeable hardscaping, materials with recycled content, low -flow fixtures among others. Concluding, Mortenson said their goal is to be very considerate of the area and built a two -story double home with common entry and underground garage. Mortenson stood for questions. A3 �- Comments Chair Staunton asked Mr. Mortenson how access to the garage is gained. Mr. Mortenson explained that access would be from the front street. Each unit would have its own curb cut, driveway and garage access. Chair Staunton noted that the subject site abuts a commercial area and the City's public ramp and asked about the potential for future expansion or redevelopment. Planner Teague responded there is potential for ramp expansion and the City has also discussed adding an additional level; however, an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be needed to proceed. Mr. Mortenson said that the topography works in their favor.adding he understands if anything is proposed for change on the abutting properties they would be made aware of those changes. Chair Staunton said his one concern was if an additional level was added to the ramp it may block sun from the_ solar panels. Continuing, Staunton stated he certainly understands the rezoning request pointing out that R -2 has been a traditional buffer between commercial and R -I residential. Commissioner Carr commented that sh understands the request to rezone; however, has a concern with the driveway and tFie height of the retaining walls needed for garage access. She asked Mr. Mortenson if he,knows_'the:.height of the retaining walls and what would be needed to support the driveway and access to the garages. Mr. Mortenson responded that he believes'the retaining walls could.be:as'high as 9: %2 -feet with two curb cuts on the lotto access the garages. Continuing, Commissioner Carr noted that the curb cuts on both- .si'des of the:units could create some safety issues especially because of the high retaining,wallsShe said she would hate to see someone fall off those walls..: W- Mortenson responded .that landscaping would be added along with a guard rail to ensuresafety. Mortenson said:he:wants the feel and look of the building to be residential and softened;with landscaping and other elements. Commissioner Potts suggested `that the.applicant meet with City staff to discuss drainage measures between . now and formal application. Potts said at first glance the proposal makes sense with regard`to,the rezoning; however, more specifics are needed especially on drainage to ensure a good project. Mr.;Mortenson said the design team will consider ways to create more permeable driveways,and patio areas and implement other measures to address drainage. Potts further suggested that'at -the time of application that all calculations be correct on lot coverage, setback, etc. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged the sustainable measures implemented for the project; however, pointed out a tear down is harder on the environment than remodel. Continuing, Forrest said she is also concerned with the variances and the lack of outdoor space. Forrest questioned why two units. Mr. Mortenson responded that the client could look at the rationale of a second unit to provide a financial benefit or the client may wish to combine families. Mortenson stated that the request to rezone made sense given the apartment building to the east and multiple double dwelling units on the same block. Mortenson did acknowledge that A315_ the rezoning request would trigger the need for variances; reiterating they felt rezoning to a double made sense. Commissioner Carr stated she agrees the rezoning makes sense; it's a good land use choice; however, she said she continues to be concerned with the two driveways. Carr said it's not only a safety issue for her but an aesthetic issue. She suggested revisiting this concept. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Teague how this area is guided in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague responded the Comp Plan guides this area as low density attached residential. Schroeder commented that it appears the rezoning moves this parcel more into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Continuing, Schroeder said he can support the rezoning; pointing out this parcel is also adjacent to an apartment building and other multiples. Schroeder said his concern is with guest parking and common areas, adding that may need to be revisited. Mr. Mortenson said in this area guest•parking is accommodated on the street or in the driveways. He also noted the near public ramp parking and the adjacent apartment building has a guest lot. Commissioner Carr complemented Mr. Mortenson: Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2014 The Council discussed the report and noted the following: on page E3, the link on Oaklawn Avenue in the Cornelia area was missing, though it was included on the map exhibit; on page 7, Safety, first paragraph, a campaign for driver education /awareness should be added; and, on page 26, the School District should be identified as the program implementation lead within school zones. The Council supported moving forward with short-term improvements not tied to adoption of the Plan such as allowing bicycles on sidewalks with limits on speed, requirement to give right of way to pedestrians in all cases, and not allowing bicycles on posted sidewalks, standardization of crosswalks throughout the City; and, continuing the City's rolling traffic enforcement program. Ms. Kunaw answered questions of the Council relating to components of the report. The Council thanked all who were involved in creation of this report, noting it was a profound work. VIII.B. SKETCH PLAN 3923 49TH STREET — REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request to rezone to R -2 to allow tearing down of a single - family home and construction of a double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. This property was 9,000 square feet and located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area. Proponent Presentation Mathias Mortenson, architect representing the proponent, described the intended environmentally - friendly construction and design that would allow the proponents to age in place as they wanted to remain within this neighborhood. The Council discussed the proposal and asked questions of Messrs. Teague and Mortenson. Mr. Teague advised of the need for a three -foot side yard setback variance for the proposed retaining wall. He stated if the property was zoned R -1 and a tear down /rebuild project, the maximum lot coverage would be 25.5% on this site. The Council offered the following direction: reconfigure the garages to require one driveway /curb cut and lower impervious surface; assure safety (guardrail /fence /landscaping) was sufficient along the retaining wall; refine the building plan to lower lot coverage /building height /hardscape; assure architectural elements and site components meet the essential character of the existing neighborhood; and, consider feasibility of repurposing the existing single - family home. VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -01 — CHAPTER 10 REGARDING RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT ENFORCEMENT — ADOPTED Mr. Teague explained the minor revisions made to Chapter 10 relating to residential redevelopment. The Council discussed the wording and agreed with the following clarifications: Page 1, Section 2.(3), seventh line, should indicate: "...the applicant must provide a detailed plans." Page 2, Section 3.(b), last sentence should be replaced with: "Work is prohibited on Sundays and holidays." Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -01, Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Residential Redevelopment Enforcement, with changes.noted. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Page 3 431' �Ke�c� NItiv\ NPuf0A \ W STREET VIEW - LOOKING SOUTHWEST IWO 07 p PRELIMINARY REVIEW - 3923 49th STREET JANU° 10, 2014 . S�I F-] MATHIAS MORTENSON • 6" 3-5 -3745 PRELIMINARY REVIEW - 3923 49th STREET JANUARY 10, 2014 u' MATHIAS MORTENSON • 612 -655 -3745 Wt51 LLLVA11Vl MATHIAS MORTENSON • 612 -655 -3745 Ca ry, Comments from Ross and I. I'm sure building will have some comments on the wall. 1. Egress well and driveway drain to landlocked areas adjacent to the foundations. It appears that there is no plan for drainage aside from calling out a 'French drain.' These areas should include either positive grade away from the foundation or a drainage system should be included that drains away. 2. It appears there is are drainage and erosion control plans proposed. A registered Civil Engineer should design these two plans. 3. There is a 8' drop near the concrete walk adjacent to the driveway, and adjacent to the patio near the egress well. I believe building code requires a railing for anything over 30- inches. 4. There are 6+ retaining walls directly adjacent to the neighboring property to the west. Any wall over 4' will require structural engineering. This wall will require permission from the neighboring property to be constructed? Thanks, Chad -' Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 8 = 952-826-0318 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 j( 1 cmillnerPEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business A' City Hall - Phone 952 - 833 -9520 Fax 952 -826 -0390 - www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 27, 2014 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director cc: Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief From: David Fisher — Chief Building Official Re: 3923 49th Street — Double Dwelling - Plans Dated February 26, 2014 .MEMO ! o`o �° The Building Department has reviewed the above proposed project with following comments: - Provide a complete building code analysis when the construction plans are submitted to the city for building permits. - Plan could be two family dwelling or four dwellings. Clarify the number of dwellings. - Provide adequate fire department access to the buildings. - Verify height requirements for the indoor accessible parking. - Verify what code building will be used to build the structure, the 2006 IRC or the 2006 IBC. - Verify if accessibility is required. An example if accessibly is required: - Accessible parking indoors and outdoors. - Ramp into dwelling at main entry. - Doors and door widths. - Door hardware. - Accessible route. - Accessible bathrooms and kitchens. - Retaining walls over 4 feet require engineering and a building permit. - Recommend this project has a pre- construction meeting with the design processionals, contractor, the project manager and the city building and fire department staff. Ra, City of Edina - 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Mary E Zarling <maryzar @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:47 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 3923 49th St west rezoning March 29, 2014 To whom it may concern, I am a home owner in the White Oaks addition of Edina and am in opposition to the rezoning of 3923 W. 49th St. Downtown Edina is encroaching on the surrounding neighborhoods. It is an extremely congested area and is faced with less and less green space each season. I see know valid reason to rezone a single family dwelling to a multiple family dwelling except to profit the builder. The White Oaks area is in the midst of suffering from street improvements made to the Country Club area which has led to the demise of neighborhood woodland and wetland areas. In good faith the city should seek to improve past errors in neighborhoods as opposed to increasing populations. Sincerely, Mary Zarling A+3 Jackie H000enakker From: David Cartwright <dmcartwright4 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 6:07 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file 2014.004 To the public hearing commission: I received a "letter seeking opinion of proposed rezoning of 3923 49 st west. l live on 4005 west 48th st and come within the 1000 ft of stated address..I am strongly opposed to tearing down any existing structure to make room for a bigger addition /duplex. There is already too much traffic congestion, am sick of the construction and noise that goes along with these projects. Sincerely, David Cartwright To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL From: Mary Brindle and Joni Bennett Date: July 15th, 2014 w9tN��r� H � � •.. o• �C�FtPOIiP�T� )ago Agenda Item #: VIII. A. Action ER Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Student Board and Commission interviews and recommendations for appointment Action Requested: Adopt recommended appointments. Information / Background: A record number of students - 58 - applied this year for 16 positions. MJ Lamon worked with the students to accommodate work and travel and scheduled interviews for Tuesday, June 10; Thursday, June 12; Wednesday, June 18 and Thursday, June 19. Three students withdrew and two failed to appear as scheduled. We personally interviewed all remaining students (32 rising seniors, 20 rising juniors and one rising sophomore). Board and commission chairs were invited to participate. We are grateful that several were able to help us this year: Ray Meifert, Arts & Culture Commission Chair; Michael Birdman, Heritage Preservation Board Chair; Ryan Weber, HPB member; Jan Seidman, Human Rights & Relations Commission Chair; Dan Gieseke, Park Board Chair; Katherine Bass, Transportation Commission Chair and Paul Nelson, ETC past chair. By ordinance, students are appointed to boards and commissions for one -year terms. Historically, students have served just one term. In the past several years, we found that when the work of a board or commission was particularly complex or a project on which a student was working continued from year to year, reappointment to a second term served both the student and the commission. This year, we worked very hard to balance continuity with opportunity, and are recommending the reappointment of just four students. The board and commission attendance ordinance applies to all board and commission members. During the interviews, we always ask students about their availability and advise them of the importance of regular attendance. However, historically, students have been given more leeway. This year, because the numbers of well - qualified applicants and positions are so mismatched, we are recommending that student attendance be reviewed at the end of December, and that students who have not attended at least 75% of the September to December meetings be replaced with alternates. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 We recommend the appointment of the students listed below to the respective boards and commissions (alternates are in ranked order): Arts & Culture Commission Sophia Munic (senior - reappointment) Jack Ready (junior - reappointment) Alternates - Claire Lindgren (senior), (Jenna) Claire Kramer (senior) Community Health Commission Aditya Mittal (junior - reappointment) Magen Puerzer (senior) Alternates - Matthew Jirsa (senior), Emily Reinke (junior) Energy & Environment Commission Reilly Anderson (senior) Sunaya Padmanabhan (senior) Alternates - Ezra Sergent - Leventhal (senior), Maria Kloiber (junior), Emily Ding (junior) Heritage Preservation Board Joseph Druckman (senior) Peter Otness (junior) Alternates - Drew Sposeep .(senior), Radhika Tandon (junior) Human Rights & Relations Commission Nicole Gates (junior) Katrina Weinert (senior) Alternates - Christina Wagner (senior), Amy Fang (senior) Park- Board — - Asef Chowdhury (senior) Graham Colwell (senior) Alternates - Talia Willmert (junior), William Staunton (junior) Planning Commission Taylor Halva (senior - reappointment) Madison Seeley (junior) Alternates - Aanik Lohani Qunior), Annie Moorhead (senior) Transportation Commission Jack Campbell (senior) Anna Rummel (senior) Alternates - Rosalie Bruns (junior), Talia Willmert (junior) 'PORT RECOMMENDATION O e ,' tr V C • �-CIDttrosif+�`� • lass To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII A I From: Council Member Joni Bennett Action Discussion ❑ Date: July 15th, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Student Board and Commission Attendance Recommendations Action Requested: Adopt recommended record - keeping, reporting and application of attendance requirements. Information / Background: Edina advisory boards and commissions have two types of members, regular and student (City Code Section 2 -80). The. only differences in code between the two types of members are age, length of term, and voting status. Regular members must be adult residents of the city and are appointed for three year terms. Student members must.be residents of the city and enrolled full -time in a secondary school. They are appointed for terms "not to exceed one year per term" (Sec. 2- 81(b)) and are nonvoting members (Sec. 2- 80(b)), Code changes doubling student membership on each board and commission from one to two and making students nonvoting members were adopted in 2010. Edina High School Principal Bruce Locklear requested the changes, stating. in an email "I do believe the experience, in this case, is far greater than the vote." (City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Item No. IV. F., April 20, 2010). In practice, the Council interviews and appoints applicants for regular membership in the early months of each year. It interviews and appoints applicants-for student membership in the summer, with student membership terms beginning in September of each year. Since 2010, the Council has interviewed every applicant for regular and student membership before appointing new members to boards and commissions. Attendance at board and commission meetings has been required by ordinance for decades. The current ordinance is City Code Section 2 -86. The purpose of the requirement is "to assist boards and commissions in fulfilling their purposes and duties and to ensure'that they are not prevented from doing so by the repeated absence of their members." (Sec. 2- 86(a)). The requirement applies to "[a]ny member serving on a board or commission." (Sec. 2- 86(b)). It'prescribes the removal of any board or commission member who fails to attend at least 75% of scheduled meetings in a calendar year or who misses three consecutive meetings. (Sec. 2- 86(b)). During interviews, Council members always ask applicants about their availability and advise them of the attendance requirements. Updated attendance records are included in the minutes of some boards and commissions, making it very easy for members of those boards and commissions to track their own attendance. After the end of each calendar year, an annual report comes to the City Council for its review per Section 2- 86(d). City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Ideally, attendance reporting allows regular members to self- assess the fit between their time, interests and the work of their board or commission. When annual reporting shows that a regular member has not been able or willing to make board and commission service fit into his /her schedule, the vacancy created by the attendance ordinance allows the Council to appoint an applicant whose time and interests are a better fit. Attendance reporting could be as useful for student members, if a few changes were made to the timing and content of attendance reports. First, the minutes of all board and commission meetings should include updated attendance records. Second, annual reports should include all members who served at any time in the calendar year. Most boards and commissions report annual attendance only for those members still serving at the end of the calendar year. This means that each year, annual reports show attendance for student members at fall meetings but not winter, spring and summer meetings. Third, attendance reports should come to the Council before it begins interviews for the next round of appointments. Calendar year reports should come to the Council in early January and an annual report of student attendance should come to the Council in early June. This new report could be drawn from the previous year's annual report (fall attendance) and the current year's minutes (winter and spring attendance). The information would help in evaluating the success of past year appointments and student applications for reappointment. Fourth and last, students who fail to meet attendance requirements in the first part of their terms should be replaced with students who are better able or willing to make board and commission service fit into their schedules. Most student board and commission members have excellent attendance, but a few don't show up regularly even in the first months of their terms. In fall 2010, of 16 student members, eight attended 100% of scheduled meetings and five attended at least 75 %. One attended just one of three scheduled meetings. In fall 2011, of 18 student members, ten attended 100% of scheduled meetings and five attended at least 75 %. One attended just one of four scheduled meetings. In fall 2012, of 16 student members, six attended 100% of scheduled meetings and four others attended at least 75 %. One attended 67% and five attended just 50 %. (One commission did not report student attendance.) Every student who applied this year was appointed; seven had served the previous year and three of them failed attendance. In fall 2013, of 16 student members, six attended 100% of scheduled meetings and seven students attended at least 75 %. One student attended just 50 %. (One commission reported no fall meetings.) Six students were appointed who had served the previous year; one failed attendance. To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Driving Range and Executive Course Renovation O Le v �y Agenda Item #: VIII.B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Action Requested: None. This report is for information only regarding the revised driving range and executive course renovation schedule. Information / Background: The original schedule for the Braemar Driving Range and Executive Course renovation called for construction to begin in early August 2014 with anticipated construction completion by late fall 2014. In April 2014, the city hired Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects to complete the driving range design and develop construction and bidding documents for the renovation. In May, the city hired Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to complete wetland delineations and to provide suggestions for wetland mitigation for this project. SEH is also assisting with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Army Corps of Engineers permitting process. The wet weather in May and June significantly delayed the wetland delineation process. SEH completed the wetland delineation report and submitted the application to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District on June 5, 2014. A site review with Barr Engineering (representing the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District) was conducted on June 24 to verify SEH's delineation report. Verification was delayed because many of the areas on the course were too wet or completely under water. The course was still recovering from flooding rains which occurred in early June and again on June 19. On May 15, 2014, The Army Corps of Engineers issued a Public Notice that the permitting process would take four months to a year, with an average time of eight months. The Special Public Notice is attached. This project will have approximately one acre of impact which would require a Letter of Permission from the Army Corps of Engineers. Based on conversations between SEH and Army Corps of Engineers staff, it is estimated that permitting for this project will take at least four months, which is approximately double the normal processing time. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Although our team has worked very hard for the past several months to receive the necessary approvals and receive authorization to bid the project for 2014 construction, staff is recommending pushing the construction schedule back to late July 2015 for the following reasons: Page 2 I . Delaying the project will allow adequate time to obtain permits from the Watershed District and the Army Corp of Engineers. It would be risky and likely more expensive proceeding with bidding the project unless we have permits in -hand. Starting the project and hoping that the permits are issued in time to complete the work is a risky proposition that could possibly lead to cost overruns, scheduling delays, increased disruption to play and increased Loss of revenue. 2. Delaying the project until 2015 would extend the amount of time between the competitive bidding and actual construction, thereby providing for a more competitive bid environment. Fall is the busiest time for golf course contractors in the Midwest because golf course owners want to start projects after Labor Day when play is down. Experience has proven that bidders in this market will be more competitive for work that starts in July or August than one starting in September or October. Most golf course construction projects in our area go out for bid during the winter and early spring prior to contractors setting their work schedules for the year. Since many contractor schedules are already set, it will be difficult to get favorable pricing so late in the season. 3. If construction starts in September or October of this year, construction would likely be complete in late June or July of 2015 and the course will not be ready for play until the following spring — a 16 to 18 month period. The contractors will be faced with having to complete the project during our rainiest season (spring) and will likely have to contend with dewatering, increased erosion and construction delays. If the project were to begin in mid July 2015 construction should be complete by October I and ready to open for play the following spring. In fact, the driving range could be playable first thing in the spring using mats and the new concrete tee -line. July to October is our driest time of year so the contractor and city should have significantly less concern for added cost or construction delays related to weather. It is possible, but very unlikely, that the Army Corp of Engineers permits would be received by September 2014. 4. Delaying the project would allow us to coordinate the design with the Master Plan Study and the Comprehensive Stormwater Study for Braemar which are both getting started. 5. One of our goals for the new Braemar Par 3 Course is to make the course as friendly as possible for kids and beginning golfers. A major challenge of the project is replacing the impacted wetlands and adding required wetland buffers without further narrowing playing corridors and increasing the difficulty of the course. Delaying the project will provide the opportunity to adequately vet all options with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Army Corps of Engineers, ensuring the best finished product. Proposed revised schedule: July 2014 August- December 2014 January/February 2015 January/February 2015 February 2015 July 15, 2015 Submit permit applications to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Army Corps of Engineers Finalize design and bid package . Obtain permits and request authorization from City Council to bid project Release plans for bidding Select contractor and award project Begin construction REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION October'I, 2015 Complete construction October 2015 -.May 2016 Grow -in and maturation May 1, 2016 Open new driving range — mats only June 1, 2016 New par 3 course open for play Attachments: Army -Corps of Engineers Public Notice Driving Range and Executive Course Plan M US Army, 'Corps of Engineers St Paul. District „Special Public Notice ISSUED: 15 May 2014 CORPS OF ENGINEERS URGES EARLY PLANNING FOR PERMITS ST. PAUL, Minn. - The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, encourages project planners. to carefully plan projects in Minnesota and Wisconsin requiring Corps permits: The Corps of Engineers also reminds planners that the majority of proposed projects and activities in and around waters and wetlands require Corps authorization. The Corps urges planners to submit `permit applications as soon as possible in the planning process. The Corps suggests submitting applications for work in waters or wetlands associated with projects, such as roads, utilities or development, at least one year prior to planned construction. Currently, timeframes for general permit decisions, those with impacts generally less than 0.5 acres are averaging 85 days. Timeframes for individual permit decisions, which include letters of permission, range from 4 months to more than a year, but are currently averaging around 8 months. The district's regulators are working through issues related to sequestration, increased construction, activities in the two states.and other constraints that have significantly impacted the timeframes within which the Corps can process permit applications. These limitations are also affecting timeframes)for other actions, such as . jurisdictional determinations and wetland delineation report reviews. More information, aboutthe Corps,of Engineers' regulatory program in Minnesota and Wisconsin can be found at:.http: / /www.nlvp.usace.army. mil /Miissions /RecaulatorV.aspx: For general permitting questions, please contact (800) 290 -5847, Ext. 5525, or (651) 290 -5525. General regulatory inquires may also be submitted at: mvp -rea- inquiry caa)usace'.armv.mil. The nearly 650 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, employees working at more than 40 sites in five upper- Midwest states serve the American public in the areas of environmental enhancement, navigation, flood damage reduction, water and wetlands regulation, recreation sites and disaster response. Through the Corps' Fiscal Year 2011 $175 million budget, nearly 2,800 non- Corps .jobs.were added to the regional economy as well as $271 million to the national economy. For more information, see www.mvp.usaee.army.mil. WIN ORR WI ■ r. NUM Yi t'� c ,_ t' � �.9a �� � Ali`\\ ��, ` ���1�.. �� '� BMW% 61 6.6xa5o 13 iF "ZS.SO 66,8]5!64 11.1-26: 3�mnv 0d W6 a95d 0. 65350.]84 00tl W;0 A04 d 09 W; 7. 62.SS d 061 .11 15,363.91 0 wi. X-1.1 41.HU1 GO C.— 100 200 � Fr ❑ MM City of Ed a Nft A R=E- N�— 6991 w.mNStree —07009M 20144 Preliminary Driving Range & Executive Course Plan FM a To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Sketch Plan Review— 4121 West 50th Street. Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. w9)� A,f� o e • ,�roRPORA�t� • 1880 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. Action ❑ Discussion N Information ❑ Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two - story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. (See location on pages A I -A3 of the Planning Commission Memo.) The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. (See the applicant narrative and building plans on pages A5 -A15 in the Planning Commission memo.) There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space (4,250 s.f.). The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRDA and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRDA Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. Planning Commission Consideration: On June 25, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) Concerns /issues raised by the Planning Commission included: ➢ Lack of parking. ➢ Introducing office use in the neighborhood could change the character. Access is off a residential street. ➢ What is the public benefit in using a PUD to allow the use? ➢ Concern over the previous use of the space as an office. ATTACHMENTS: Minutes from the June 25, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting Planning Commission Memo, June 25, 2014 Page 2 B. Sketch Plan — 4121 West 50th Street Planner Presentation Planner Teague said the Planning Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two -story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRD -4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. Planner Teague concluded that this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. Appearing for the Applicant Matt Duffy Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if the "uses" are already present on the site. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He said the request would formalize the current use of the building. Commissioner Carr questioned if soundproofing would occur to mitigate noise from the office use. Planner Teague responded he is not certain how that would be handled; pointing out the use already exists. Page 9 of 11 Aoulicant Presentation Mr. Duffy explained that Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and building, adding the current zoning of the site is PRD-4, Planned Residence District -4. Duffy further explained the history of the site and that the owner would like to continue to use the second floor as his office space. He added all units are insulated for noise and the use of the 2nd floor as office space would only occur during the daytime hours. Duffy said there would be no retail customer traffic, reiterating the office use would operate during regular office hours, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. Concluding, Duffy said in 2009 the building was remodeled to accommodate eight residential units with a lower level unit remodeled to accommodate handicap accessibility. Concluding, Duffy noted the property owner resides in the neighborhood and would enjoy having his family and friends stop by for a visit while he is at work in the building. Discussion Commissioner Scherer questioned the number of units. Mr. Duffy responded he believes there will be six units. Chair Staunton said he has a concern that the requested change in use introduces an element in the area that's not typical, adding parking could also present an issue. Staunton acknowledged that the requested change in use makes him a little nervous; pointing out it could be considered "commercial creep ". Staunton suggested engaging the neighborhood to discuss the proposed use. Commissioner Schroeder pointed out that this location isn't commercial and the proposed change in use in his opinion isn't compatible with the nature of Indianola. Commissioner Forrest questioned the applicant on the timing of this request pointing out the renovations occurred a number of years ago. Mr. Duffy responded that the scale of the property owners business is changing and he would like to formally accommodate this change. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged she resides in the neighborhood and did inquire about the use of the residential building as office. Continuing, Forrest pointed out the permitted use of this site is only residential- permitting apartment units; not office, and asked Mr. Duffy how many residents now reside in the building. Mr. Duffy responded he is unaware of the current tenant count; but did acknowledge the nature of the residential tenants is mostly transient. Concluding, Forrest said she is concerned that presently there is a violation of use occurring on this site, adding her main concerns are that at present the building appears deserted and rezoning the site to PUD would be an extension of commercial creep. Forrest stated she would keep an open mind if the rezoning moves forward; however, reiterated she doesn't like the introduction of commercial into this area. Chair Staunton explained to the applicant in a request to rezone a site to PUD there needs to be a community benefit. Staunton said when a formal application is made the applicant needs to Page 10 of 11 address what the benefit to the community would be if this property was rezoned from residential to PUD. Staunton thanked the applicant for his presentation. CITY OF MEMO City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CiVofrdina.com o e v � �O Date: June 25, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 4121 West 50th Street The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to allow a change in use of the existing two -story apartment building at 4121 West 50th Street. (See location on pages Al -A3.) The proposal is to continue the multi - family use on the first floor and lower level, and remodel the second floor into office space. A PUD rezoning is therefore proposed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contains nine residential units. Most units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 bathrooms and are roughly 1,000 square feet in size. The building recently was significantly remodeled. (See the applicant narrative and building plans on pages A5 -A15.) There are no plans to expand or modify the exterior of the building. The proposal would simply be for a remodel of the 2nd floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan would maintain the two residential units in the basement or lower level; maintain the four units on the first floor; and remodel the three units on the third floor into office space (4,250 s.f.). The property is currently zoned Planned Residential District 4, PRD-4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Center. The MXC allows multifamily residential and office space. Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The following would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development to write a specific zoning ordinance for the site to allow the proposed uses. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A4.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO �qZ A. r� �1 n� However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. The following is a compliance table that demonstrates how the proposed building would comply with the PRD -4 standards and show residential densities in Edina. The proposed office use is currently not allowed in the existing PRD -4 Zoning District. Compliance Table * Existing condition * *Variance Required Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. However, the vacant lot to the south, owned by the applicant could however, serve as proof -of- parking if needed. (See page A2.) For now the applicant would continue to maintain this open lot as open space for the neighborhood. (See narrative.) This vacant site however, is zoned and guided for low density residential use. As part of any rezoning application a site plan would have to be provided to show parking stall and drive -aisle circulation. A traffic study would be required to determine impact on the adiacent roadways. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard Proposed (PRD -4) Front — 50th Street 35 feet 30 feet* Front — Indianola 35 feet 25 feet* Side — south 35 feet 40+ feet Side — east 35 feet 20 feet* Building Height 4 stories or 2 stories 48 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 21% Density — Comp. Plan 12 -30 units max 12 units /acre Parking Stalls 1.25 enclosed space +.75 9 enclosed = 11 surface ** (Commercial District) surface spaces per unit 1/200 s.f. for office 25 surface +8 enclosed required * Existing condition * *Variance Required Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. However, the vacant lot to the south, owned by the applicant could however, serve as proof -of- parking if needed. (See page A2.) For now the applicant would continue to maintain this open lot as open space for the neighborhood. (See narrative.) This vacant site however, is zoned and guided for low density residential use. As part of any rezoning application a site plan would have to be provided to show parking stall and drive -aisle circulation. A traffic study would be required to determine impact on the adiacent roadways. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 4907. 49] 6 .4917 '24 3J49 3'M4 L I j4_116 , fit! ?f �3yi5 5►1 E� fl 49: 2 STREETWEST 4909 4QZG 5 — :,l 24 4911 .,490 4 '4925 24, f 4 _ - - 4930 1 2 24 24 3925 49361 4928 492 �+ �. - 24 -4917 4032 3 -�:, 4943 493j'4200, �4. A100 ; q , 3930 3'3Z4 1�4ZZ 3806 4419 443: _ 3402 _..__,.�...�_ .._, .v -.. ..�.�.�..�.._ .K �_� - ST�iEET1VEST' — - - WF 5GTH STREET ST 5G151,i� - I 421 :4201 24 393J :3917 50Cii.w z4 w 3911 uj 5405 5o1 5t7G7 a� 24 -J 'S0�0 201 JI �t }39r 5009 5024 z '4 ' �' I'l, 5011 42150 )5634 5036 .VS03Z :Sb2b 15029 :5026 ' 5015 5040 77. ` 'r I _o 5YC11 530C r 5019, 5044 ,w� Z _-STREET WEST ,� q {- : 01 ^ - LL1 51,. �510Q �� 5101 5.101 5100 ►- X5109 'S1C�S.. 9 ! 5101 5100 :510 -514 �I' *1513s 51'12 6 _ _ i ^51n5 5104 5105 41 i Parcel i Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N A -T -B: ID: Print Date: 6/20/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel ; Tax _ Address: i Total: Property Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale ... Area: Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 , 'A Think Green! 41 �. - 4 a - la 's_ l �+ `4 ' LLj i ax _ w � a Parcel A -T -B: ID: Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel Tax Address: Total: Property Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel Sale Area: Code: 40 e ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan ,.nd LDR -Low Den sitf Re slcleneal OR- Office Resideflfal RM- RegionalMedcal L OAR - L- D—ty An.hed ResldenlMl 0- Office CSP - Open Space and P a,ks MDR - Medium Denally Resdenbal MXC - Mined Use Center PSP. PubfcSemLPUMIc HDR -Hlgn Densely FesNertiM ®GC- CanrruniY ACeyty Center LAH- LimLed Access highway ERC. Neighborhood Commercial I Inctstnal S' I a tlr i rJti 1, dart. ` 1 eI E a 1 , P� a r` o g Ili b °! I 1 I P N A a 4 2 _ 4r ,2C' 0 o f N N54th 9t a` as O D E ws �mrlew La tr L I .i 1 z, ..... ........ .. .... _.�...— —wsu I J Gonion RV, Ci 0 a` Height Limits' o c'. M o 2 Stories: 24' 2 0° 3 Stories: 36' 1. z 4 Stories: 48' e Z ''. "--y lnt - u Podium Height e ^ City of Edina r 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design A3 f I HDR L w 64th st Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Northeast Quadrant Figure 4.6A LN� L 4 -53 for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan Legend: Potential Areas of Change 1, '15 W 39(h St 1- North France Avenue — 2- Neighborhood ConTnercial Nodes 3 c(Imrryj - nity Corrrnerdal Nodes 4- So uthdale A 6 - Commercia6r0eaffice Corridors ir —I W 169 t. y&'J? 4". '11W A '5;'N -, h, , 'i, , - - r.,rR,- WU W RN <0 ffia 19WRO dl, 4 un AM M 65th st 44 Eli 11, HOW W RM M I ] V 00 a RZ-[ R-41 75 V 'j n zi L i 78th-5, W 75,h 5% W 80th st W Figure 4.4 City of Edina Conceptual Land Use Framework: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Potential Areas of Change Date of Aerial Photography: August 2006 F-L-F-L-1-1 0 0.5 miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-33 IT7 APPLI c &N T �f mA- -r) uf 4121 West 501h Street Dromoland, LLC's Proposed Planned United Development Planned Unit Development — Proposed Use Description Dromoland, LLC currently owns the land and the building located at 4121 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (the "Property "). Dromoland, LLC is a wholly -owned subsidiary of EGO Holdings, LLC, a single member LLC owned solely by Edgar Gerald (Jerry) O'Brien. The Property is currently zoned PRD -4. Historically, the building's primary use since Dromoland has owned it has been as a multi -unit residential building with limited professional space on the second floor used as the building's management and leasing office. However, Mr. O'Brien would now like to use the existing second floor space and obtain approval for the second floor use, as may be necessary, for institutional (non - retail) investment management business purposes, resulting in the Planned Unit Development ( "PUD ") proposal that follows. Dromoland's proposed PUD would seek rezoning the Property to a mixed use classification. Such a change would accommodate both the building's current primary use as a multi -unit residential building as well as allow for the use of the existing second floor office space to house a proposed institutional investment business. The proposed PUD would also allow for the repurposing, as necessary, of a portion of the building's second floor that currently includes the building's management /leasing office, a large gathering area, and two fully equipped and rentable residential units. The repurposing would take advantage of the existing configuration and, with minor renovations, allow for the entire second floor space to be used for institutional investing purposes to the extent the entire second floor is needed for such purposes. If not, the two residential units would remain for lease to individual residential tenants. To the extent expansion is someday required, the modest renovations would include converting the two existing residential units into office space by removing non -load bearing walls, and creating walkways between what are now separate units. Such changes would not include any modifications to the exterior of the building. The total square footage of the proposed complete second floor office space would be approximately 4,250 square feet. Unlike many financial service and investment brokerage offices, Dromoland's proposed use will have no retail customer traffic although it-will maintain normal business hours of approximately 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday- Friday, excluding typical bank and exchange holidays. The work hours will co -exist well with the residential uses of the building, because the tenants typically would be gone during the workday when employees would be working in the office. Dromoland anticipates a maximum of 20 employees in the event a full expansion of the second floor is completed for business uses. As for parking, the Property currently can accommodate approximately 19 -20 parking spaces (9 interior and 10 -11 exterior). If further parking is required, Dromoland is willing to explore several options, including, but not limited to, approaching the neighboring church to lease parking spaces in the church's lot as well as looking into similar arrangements with other commercial neighbors. 1 A5'- The Building In 2009, Dromoland remodeled both the exterior and interior of the 1950s Georgian multifamily building. The exterior faeade was enhanced with the addition of a front porch including white columns and a functional balcony on the second floor. Inside, the building was completely renovated into eight residential units. Most of the units have two bedrooms and 1 % bathrooms. The lower level unit recently was renovated into a handicap accessible unit, including a walk -out patio. Since the renovation, the building has been used as temporary housing for Edina residents who typically are remodeling their permanent homes, executive transfers searching for homes, or, in one recent situation, by a family renovating their home to accommodate accessibility needs of their son who suffered a debilitating sports injury. During the extensive 2009 renovation of the Property, great care was taken to promote energy efficiency, accessibility and reuse and repurposing of the existing building. The remodel included energy efficient appliances and windows, LED lighting, and abundant natural light that was maximized by the building's enhanced design. In fact, the design work was so meticulous that it won the 2010 ROMA design award from the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (details at: http: / /www.stonehearthremodeling .com/awards.html). Civic Involvement As long -time residents of Edina, Mr. O'Brien and his wife, Lisa, are actively involved in the community. From sponsoring Edina events and projects to hosting numerous neighborhood events for residents, the O'Briens are inextricably intertwined in the community. In addition to the O'Briens' city involvement, the O'Briens host many community gatherings where neighbors have a chance to meet and interact with local, state and national policymakers. Similarly, the O'Briens are long -time financial supporters, board members and volunteers with Greater Minneapolis United Way; Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery; Edina Public School District; Minnesota Community Foundation &_ St. Paul Foundation; University of Minnesota Weisman Museum of Art; and are dependable contributors to the Edina Community Foundation and Edina Ed Fund. Mr. O'Brien's Backl1round Mr. O'Brien has lived in the Twin Cities for more than 20 years and in Edina since 1995. Mr. O'Brien was recruited to the area by Cargill where he worked in its financial businesses for 17 years. Mr. O'Brien left Cargill with the goal of creating a new company, in partnership with Warren Staley (retired CEO and Chair of Cargill and an Edina homeowner for decades). Since leaving Cargill, Mr. O'Brien has managed investments for himself and Mr. Staley, but was limited by a non - compete from managing third party capital. Mr. O'Brien has fully satisfied the terms of his non - compete and now has the opportunity to expand his investment activity to include managing investments for select institutional investors (e.g. college endowment, state retirement plans, family offices). 2 Neighborhood Amenity Dromoland also owns the vacant lot adjacent and behind the Property. The vacant lot is currently used as neighborhood green space. The lot is zoned for a single - family residence, although Dromoland has converted the lot into a T -ball field for use by the building's tenants and neighborhood children (by invitation) and as a neighborhood amenity. The field was recently resurfaced with new infield dirt and re- seeded for use this summer. For the foreseeable future, Dromoland plans to keep the T -ball field as is. Neighborhood Discussions about Proposed Use In preparation for the anticipated PUD rezoning request, Mr. O'Brien has spoken to several neighbors about his proposed use. To date, Mr. O'Brien's proposed use has been well- received and Mr. O'Brien is not aware of any negative comments. Personal Reasons for Proposed Use On a personal level, Mr. O'Brien wants to use this existing space because he lives in the neighborhood, his mother -in -law resides in the condominiums next door to the Property (the Henley), and he enjoys having his family and friends pop -in to visit while walking around 50`h & France. MMB: 4811- 3004 -6235, v. I 3 Al Y,, .,.., . EDENDERRY OF ED1NA ring ROMA award - winning design modeled in .assical style, Edenderry of Edina features high executive apartment units that accentuate :able" lifestyle while allowing short driving dis- s within the entire Minneapolis /St. Paul region. .ed near Edina's 50th and France entertainment ct, this exclusive living opportunity will make eel right at home and part of the community. w EDENDERRY \ OF EDINA The Edenderry of Edina uniquely offers premium, well- appointed apartments that are within walking distance to shops, restaurants, grocery and enter- tainment establishments. 0 oi�. i The timeless ideals of order, symmetry and grace are reflected throughout the propert Every Edenderry of Edina unit enjoys: Located in the heart of historic Edina you to custornize the right lease to fit • 2 Bedroom, 1' /z Bath • Award Winning Design i 3 ` Minnesota, living in comfort and luxury has never been more accessible. • In -unit Laundry • Abundance of Natural Light Fully-furnished or va"int Short Term, 1,ong Term, orSeasonal • ±1,000 square feet • Spacious Grounds e7� Kids or Dog Friend]\ • Granite Countertops • Walking Distance to Shops Lim Ordinatio I Symmetria I Eurythmia Outdoor • Hardwood Floors • Edina School District Order Symmetry Grace Supplemental Storage Lockers • LG Appliances • Heated Parking Option ,ihil,il,lh�hili,. ,i ,1,��,�I_'.hil �hilsihif,il j1.= i1�1n1= 1c11�11 'cr1�,�1- 1:'�hlh�hil -p�_, _�hlhlhl� 1�= 1��= 1J�_ J1JJ- 1J�1�l- jCl^lJ�= 1��_'�l- l�= 1J�= 1�_1�! �JJ�JJ�JJ Riltl Unit300 Personal Office INTERIOR PHOTOS OF EDENDERRY OF EDINA, UNIT 300 xi to Unit 300 1 Unit 300, SeatingArea i.00 Balm"m AO AL O' x 41 �J -7. C85 FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE REFERENCED TO A BENCHMARK AS NOTED. ON SHEET 7 OF 2 LC.E. - DENOTES.LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT C.E. - DENOTES COMMON ELEMENT 11 W °D fw.D� NYMr ,- [�. W d [uDFM rrp°wf , . [se arcs q r. •1 MIMI CIC NUMBER 1935 .A CONDOMINIUM THE EDENDERRY OF EDINA CIC PLAT UNIT !00 �� [rnuDU a[Ker UNIT 100 • II� i f UNIi' 101 % he ,r r •--- -• l� (NO SCALE �loe uxr wn° .nwy .lDruxnrrnYO�� ^ 1I GARAGE UNIT. ruvu �sein•vn. ° �DJ J Gd '�• �II /"'I �"``5 ~ - -� GARAGE _UNR 6 q y, I gu•: ;,'c`n:+... . 1t 9g9!79f' �'Y1� cawar UNIT 102 ' BASEMENT " lul"•'c urK w: ruulxr D alY°r A wrte raa� umn c ear.• m w.•+. I,�trD+r r `i..ra awm nowt D sc mw a I SECOND FLOOR he ,r DETAIL B (NO SCALE �za', I CAReCN UNIT rAU: •I i , IS.T��J .lDruxnrrnYO�� ^ 1I GARAGE UNIT. ruvu �sein•vn. ° '�• �II /"'I �"``5 ~ - -� GARAGE _UNR 6 q y, I gu•: ;,'c`n:+... 1 �'Y1� cawar UNIT 102 ' -flJJ �, ... - ,�wuaci D .F.�` u.°i°t, E uNrr 200 I P ry �Ii�T rea. Ourr 9104 11+I I� i.auu �.,,�• -.i -� FIRST FLOOR ktLt3 > I _J.' -aus rwriew Yi L,°Mmvmm.aawVu UNIT 2�00 UN7T.e01 t SECOND FLOOR DETAIL A DETAIL B (NO SCALE (NO SCALE) I CAReCN UNIT rAU: •I i , IS.T��J urny WIIi w°"P.c unao 'B uaw°°a�u�.•r ••• S ^• • u.w�wrym wnrer e GARAGE UNIT. ruvu �sein•vn. ° '�• �II /"'I �"``5 ~ - -� GARAGE _UNR 6 q y, I gu•: ;,'c`n:+... 1 �'Y1� cawar UNIT 102 ' � �, ... - ,�wuaci D .F.�` u.°i°t, P ry �Ii�T rea. . w � i.auu �.,,�• -.i -� GARAGE smD.rc,Da,m �-uwm ca•a nlrar a Ewa tD • Declarant may subdivide, combino or, convert units Into additional units. common elements or limited common olamenta. - - �) Carlson rAnressloRil anvlcss w.vr ° s •• slrtrr° SU a- 5-- LL- 9-0" OFFICIAL Fit. SITE PLAN CIC NUMBER 1935 C&Ww oef pu 4m A CONDOMMUM am= avmmXa[f THE EDENDERRY OF EDINA . - Wib1TS YOUiB o>edt YoCNVIR CIC PLAT tun0101 gsrNB cmjmRm >a . rm +nu - mmm Ebs11X° LO ". mm E udo; VfALL - C mml, OLY°JT LAG - OMM U.= °oa= mm+r em - coon tcuw i anmlr E* S i 5 0 T H S T R E E i ° wu' ore vw° of .114 arS1LB tSlS 4 Uia °'r�nt� t aab� °or �1 bti +�dna tiro 4f. —lei go la, •1 w t mE a w im d. °ma t. ^SWM6 IS! A000W ,o ,w1M[araE3' aW Uwl ,hb.[tC pIH AM' em _ae,.lj depkt• a Siwm•Ipfn .•.A•d by ll V_ta swwlt Sdnlm f,a)Zrtm 7 M IP•i 1 •N s ddJ UM.fO toed >m`•in �� tw Ian a Ur 9ku.af elknaa,a Bead we 'y dnEm ►J.rRwj,@3FY 20-65. .. �? tbemaf R Wl.d. L•nd t w—. WIT. I,~ 46161 eLXaoffat, • ••�.�etr ,• xr— =- sue'-"" J a . v.]' .S -f . .1 ®_ ` \�• ISWtt 611lEfwRSft . fw Eareee'ne welwnad m aefnee4dem baler• m• we 3Hh d•Y M mnmmt C,-, ro..A py 16ema. R wal. �7 I - Lud Snwyv. YNnne,o Uwe•r rla a°16,. - �y"�•St' ;` 'Wirr��tiVrJ%: • ' ° 1 . s'. Y•w- .Aaeeyt�l ee•ht . IGm.dom Yr Con W[m GoIV• �)S.,• g ,�'re\ I -• LJ $ref t \' Su skw tt or S S,Yf,E rai wn aYpq°XS. �"�' nrnn 1 w�n�m{.p� m.�sYanuw:we wl� uv wui enaiM m°ectM�nkd �mn +er a malai Irvgwai yaye�.ryy ! I 33 'e�i� � - w um• mYrn.m�ia.1e11vpj a.wnaa n.a not. �� a i tl w_Inn I? oaJW.di!<fa3/d.� wet <C LJ I atl b � iil',i \'i.i i" •if'iiiiivi v . , , [j U YA_ �Bf uumus9 eawra ELah uw�mata txae. Xvmba tWOL i . J r A J �i 140.00 4 e0nln or Au _. far. �•. �•-�= •..— �• �� 1M ipypbp NNVrmM ss m/nwletrN W6n nu dd! �\,ltl'da1 nt bidlMfMbelr . t°� by Ihb+ d wYX /CKb. 4..Vob.♦ab 1/ ' .O Itld. Vw•d•1b.7rA67. I ,pros PnWkr ACf1Ot�G1/1_ CNnlA Ilirm•Ya10 (�; A . Y.A 1611- • ',]nf f V IVIIf \!.Gnu Va.lJ Yr {phn}e.tpq [•pVm A �O4A T- L- I I I It as tr GYSOG XeendpN Camlp Yb•Ua1a itw em mat bee w.n I"" •ea, append mM1 „ty„ tl•Y of xiC9- L7 nmbin n. IhdlM1 ,I.mNh aywiY S•'Maa cuawA eC 7w wit or.. wmamr AT Sourmir vulu G DDlOW 3 AM TO WO VOCE a Milk A=M a ° "ea•°_-- �^-'— '•' - -'- (UAOtwrt IX WV WM BMW AM 2AD)OA. .. ♦♦♦ AYRaL. aRwotta - 68A14 rw Q1M1V.d t100 -mamm � ew� wuc w srsr �J Carlson e6n�°, se� r�°°iaa° eoAVO1o_ nee a u am a.tfn tRdiEAe t ' fROEE36I0NAL SERVICES awna�h•oawuaa•sra.e eJ' 1EEI 1 or ..6TIS WM4� ON BASE MIEN'T ---------- ---------- ------------ amp-- ...... ........ . .... .................. ... MAN e 1. VA ONT, 204. sv YP vam 3 tt is j _0 I-A , " �u- /11-3 y.o-v, 6, wa m op M Bu E R... 19 357- NDOMINNIUM )ERRY OF EDINA IC PLAT , M. mar *M-ft W, V, mon I f Wit. 10 .............. mr- y mp tl"gP MeWl"i MOON'S ' 1v %W., WO om �'lxvmam—mwr Ir.-ow—'s nx-ft wa-"!w ?Bmv Our M , �-v o —'a 'a SECO',NTD FlOOR D ETAM A 0 CA- ). DETA 1, IN - mp -Al RWIP SECO',NTD FlOOR D ETAM A 0 CA- ). DETA 1, IN - WlCi#19 � 4 SITE- PLAN CIC .1,,. U -M E R 1-935 CAMW W fiY.t. MGNVAICrIT. A CONDOMINIUM � � Tf"zNOCiSI fIYQ lt` �f �iEr '��`�J '��'''(j�'OF- - w . �7pfOT4S f01A I![Oi! Mo►iUl1ENT THE DE..i ,il ER.RY DINI r CENOTf CIC PST. asmzraaw - MOTES fAstRfi to PT. CLOW fAM-1G -.VM L -• 0=014T B"E"T O A L p4iN ms LW IM C(Allial ELWNT f £, I#flld[E9 COd1AH3a T (w it tit �df 315t9- fCx� r r 1r: a .,.. ► 1 .: f R s. x., f rnnm :• �.,.YY ,..x w- 14Q.f](t ,.....� ........� a..........._.a _ STAT 1. >`$2. ".�44 -.„• ' t �pWYf�,�tl �714�tf '+. " '!= `°�'�eA§ ""§, It^. 'rY .. . .Jgl�3` Gd .6p . b L =d Y 0) � s lu _ `"f .s7 f f: i Bri f1 �.! V4z§,, .t .FVI;.tj„7J )Ls'1 v. ... +{ ILI r4 L, t. 1 ?J89AAI�rxscarrsxiiz�ai q Pa 1 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community. Development Director Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Sketch Plan Review — 7200 France Avenue Action Requested: Provide non- binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Agenda Item #: VIII.D. Action ❑ Discussion Information ❑ 100)) Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 3.51 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue. (See property location on pages AI —A3'in the Planning Commission Memo.) The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a`six and four -story mixed use development project that would include the following: 170 unit apartment (6 stories) (20% affordable) ➢ 25 units of row housing. (4 stories) 45,500 square feet of'retail space including two restaurants. ➢ A two - level underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France side of the project. Access to the residential portion of the development would be from 72nd Street. Access to the retail portion would be off of France Avenue. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to. provide screening from the residential area to the west. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages.A4 -A24.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height - from 4 stories to .6 stories. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.88. A rezoning of all the property would then be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Planning Commission Consideration: On June 25, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. See attached minutes.) Concerns /issues raised by the Planning Commission included: ➢ Traffic concern. Cut through traffic into the residential neighborhood to the'. west & the right slip lane off of France. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 J Too much "mass" on the street. No podium height is used as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. ➢ Uses were generally ok. Some had concern over density and height, other were ok with it. Height — 6 stories vs. 4. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the June 25, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Revised Narrative Dated June 23, 2014 . m. Planning Commission Memo, June 25, 2014 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 210, Union Plaza, Minneapolis, MN 55401 T. 612.676.2700 F: 612.676.2796 www.djr- inc.com une 16 201 — Updated June 23, 2014 Cary Teague, Planning Director Planning Department Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Project: Mixed -Use Redevelopment Location: 7200 France Avenue South Subject: Sketch Plan Narrative Proposed Redevelopment: This presentation for Sketch Plan Review is a conceptual design for the redevelopment of the site at 7200 France Avenue South. The proposal is to demolish the existing office building and associated parking and construct a mixed -use redevelopment of approximately 480,000 SF with site improvements and including garage area. The proposed project includes approximately 195 residential units, 26,500 SF of restaurant/retail /office space, and approximately 570 parking spaces. City and Neighborhood Betterment: The proposed redevelopment of this parcel from office to residential and retail uses will benefit the city and area surrounding the project in the following ways: • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial and office sectors (80 %/20% split of market rate to affordable housing) • Provide convenient retail /commercial uses for the area. • Locates parking within building creating better visual environment for vehicular and pedestrian traffic around the site • Improve the site with more vibrant uses and an attractive building • Create a greener and more environmentally friendly development improving storm water rates through retained green space, green roofs and rain gardens. • Alternative energy options including photovoltaics are being pursued to lower the projects carbon footprint. • Sustainable design strategies will be incorporated into the project such as efficient lighting, mechanical systems, and rainwater harvesting for irrigation. • Detailed and landscaped plaza courtyard beautifying the 72 "d Street edge and internal courtyard. • Provides small scale neighborhood serving retail. • Add new businesses to the Edina tax base. 7200 France Avenue South — Sketch Plan Review Narrative PUD / Zoning: The project proposes to change the zoning of the site from POD -1 to a PUD using the MDD -6 as a basis for the zoning entitlements. The application for a PUD is based largely around a desire to develop a more pedestrian friendly development, a mixture of uses and a greater density for the site. The proposed building will enclose the vast majority of parking below grade and maintain a 60' -0" setback and existing vegetative buffer from the residential neighborhood to the west. In addition, the site is structured to keep the higher height and density toward France Avenue with the lowest height toward the residential neighborhood. The effective site size is 3.18 acres (138,650 SF). The proposed development not including garage space is approximately 261,000 GSF for a proposed FAR of 1.88. The overall density of the site is largely mitigated by the stepping down of the height from France Avenue to the west toward the single family housing. The landscaped courtyard in the center off of 72nd street also scales the building to the neighborhood and provides a welcoming entry to residential visitors and the neighborhood. Comprehensive Plan / Greater Southdale Area Land Use and Parking Final Report The current comprehensive plan has recommended office and high density residential uses for this site area and neighborhood from 69th street south to Parklawn (Edge West District) in the Greater Southdale Area Land Use report. In addition, the site is within the Southdale area of mixed -use region around the mall in the character defining areas in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is in keeping with that high density housing concept while keeping the commercial aspects open to office, retail or restaurant uses. We believe the redevelopment of this site would be an improvement for the city and one that will enhance not only the character of the area, but also the city itself. Sincerely, Sheldon Berg, AIA Principal Cc: Adam Seraphine, NHH Properties Lori Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation 7200 France Avenue South - Sketch Plan Narrative.doc 4 A discussion ensued on what would happen if the site was approval and the double wasn't built; would the single family home be nonconforming. Planner Teague explained it would be nonconforming; however, if rebuilt as a single, family home it would have to be built exactly as is today. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 7200 France Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission a request to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 3.5.1 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue has been made. - Teague said the applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a six and four -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 170 unit apartment (6 stories) (20% affordable) ➢ 25 units of row housing. (4 stories) ➢ 45,500 square feet of retail space including two restaurants. A two -level underground parking ramp. Teague noted the retail space would be located on the France side of the project. Access to -the'residential portion of the development would be from 72nd Street. Access to. the retail portion would be off of France Avenue. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories to 6 stories. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.88. A rezoning of all the property would then be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis DJR Architects and Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation. Discussion Commissioner Lee asked what the zoning of the subject site is and if the existing building was non - conforming. Planner Teague responded the subject site is zoned POD, Planned Office District and the building is non - conforming. Teague said the site is proposed to incorporate elements of the mixed use zoning district. Page 5 of 11 Applicant Presentation Mr. Dovolis addressed the Commission and explained in his opinion the geometry of the site works well with the proposed redevelopment. Dovolis explained the goal is to create a gracious entry off of France Avenue that would be an improvement for the City and will enhance the - character of the neighborhood. Dovolis pointed out the mixed, use aspects of the proposed redevelopment would provide the following: 0 The proposed building will replace an existing building with paved surface parking lot. 0 26,500 square-feet' of retail /office space. 0 195 residential housing u nit s'to include an affordable housing element (20 %). 0. 570 parking spaces'. 0 Majority of the parking spaces would be located within the building (underground) creating abetter visual environment. 0 Maintain and enhance green space area to the vest. • Development of roof deck(s), green space and" rain gardens. 0 Commercial traffic off France Avenue. 0 Residential traffic off West 72nd Stree.t • Improvement of storm water rates. 0 Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Dovolis concluded in his opinion the proposed redevelopment would be a nice evolution along France Avenue providing both housing and retail. Dovolis introduced Laurie Boisclair to further . speak to the affordable housing element of the project. Ms. Boisclair explained that there is an 80%/20% split of market rate to. affordable housing. Boisclair said a survey found that the pay rate of those qualifying for "affordable" housing make between $18.00- $25.00 per hour. Discussion With respect to the affordable housing element Commission Scherer asked when the units "turn- over" will the affordability component also carryover. Ms. Boisclair responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest asked if a square footage per unit was established. Ms. Boisclair responded that she believes a one bedroom unit would be roughly 800 square feet. Unit size would increase thereafter. Chair Staunton asked if the proposed townhomes are vertical. Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Kilberg commented that he appreciates the step down element of the building and that special attention was paid to retaining the landscaped buffer on the west. Kilberg said in his opinion the proposal as presented does a good job of balancing density and height. Kilberg acknowledged that the area was designated in the Comprehensive Plan as four stories; however, at first look the proposal appears promising to him. Concluding, Kilberg encouraged the development team to pay special attention to finding traffic solutions pointing out this area is heavily travelled. Page 6 of 11 Commissioner Lee said she finds the proposal interesting and exciting; however does have concerns with traffic. She added it has been her experience that the speed of traffic along this stretch of France Avenue is high and suggested the addition of turn lanes and broadening the zone along France Avenue. Mr. Dovolis agreed traffic needs to be carefully considered adding the project introduces a "slip lane" that is needed to guide and calm traffic into the site. Continuing, Lee questioned why six stories are needed. Dovolis said height is needed to afford the underground parking. He said the proposed density allows amenities and improves the aesthetics of the site by locating the majority of parking underground. Dovolis acknowledged there is a balance of density to use. Commissioner Platteter said he also finds this an interesting project. He further suggested when formal application is made that the applicant provide materials indicating building heights in the surrounding area. Platteter added he is also concerned with the slip lane and ramp access /valet parking. Continuing, Platteter said he appreciates the podium height; however there may be too much height on France Avenue. Platteter stated he's not opposed to six stories; however much depends on where those six stores are located. Commissioner Carr said she too is interested in the proposal; however, finds the building mass along France Avenue too much. Carr suggested more articulation in building wall through colors or angles. Continuing, Carr asked where guest parking was located. Mr. Dovolis responded that guest parking would be in the underground garage, adding there are also a few "short term" parking spaces at grade. Commissioner Carr asked if bike racks are provided. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Olsen acknowledged the mix of uses; however, said she was struggling with the density, building mass and traffic. Olsen said in her opinion much hinges on the traffic study and what it reveals. She also said the development team needs to work carefully with a traffic engineer and with the County. Concluding, Olsen suggested a more straight connectivity and the addition of a traffic signal. Mr. Dovolis responded they are working with a traffic engineer and are looking at introducing a curb less design will bollards. Dovolis said they are trying to achieve a different effect with this redevelopment. Continuing, Dovolis said he would continue to focus on traffic and the pedestrian mix with the hopes of "enhancing this area ". Dovolis said he was also considering tying the project with the open space to the north by developing a playground /public area that would benefit not only the residents of the building but the City. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged sustainability aspects of the project; however asked the applicant to provide a more detailed and" measurable plan prior to formal application. Commissioner Schroeder said at this time he doesn't have an issue with the mix of uses or density; however, does have a concern that future residents of the building will cut through the neighborhood to go north /west. Schroeder pointed out a residential neighborhood and school are located to the north and west of the subject site and special attention needs to be paid to the potential for cut through traffic. Continuing, Schroeder said he also has a concern with traffic maneuvering and traffic movements from both France and West 72nd Street. Schroeder acknowledged while the project has much to like about it he believes traffic will be the major drawback. Schroeder said he was supportive of connecting the open space to the north with the project as a playground /public space; however, believes that area may be "open space" to Page 7 of 11 filter storm water for the neighborhood. Concluding, Schroder said the architecture is good, but the access points are difficult. Chair Staunton stated he echo's comments from other Commissioners, adding he likes the mixed use aspect of the project but believes there are some challenges with circulation; acknowledging that the mixed use concept does spread out the traffic. Continuing, Staunton said he was not alarmed by the height; however, there was a reason the Comprehensive Plan deliberately guided this area for no more than four stories. Staunton acknowledged at the time the Comprehensive Plan was revised the City was operating on the premise that four stories west of France Avenue was best. Staunton said in this instance the Commission and Council need to figure out if this is still the case and what this area of Edina can handle. Concluding, Staunton said he's not opposed to the redevelopment plan; it has promise; however, the City needs to be sure this type of density can be handled in this area. Chair Staunton thanked Mr. Dovolis and Ms. Boisclair for their presentation, adding he looks forward to the formal application. Page 8 of 11 City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: June 25, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 7200 France Avenue MEMO w9iN�1r.'L o J � �O The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 3.51 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue. (See property location on pages Al A3.) The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a six and four -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 170 unit apartment (6 stories) (20% affordable) ➢ 25 units of row housing. (4 stories) ➢ 45,500 square feet of retail space including two restaurants. ➢ A two -level underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France side of the project. Access to the residential portion of the development would be from 72nd Street. Access to the retail portion would be off of France Avenue. The existing vegetation,and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 -A24.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories to 6 stories. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.88. A rezoning of all the property would then be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO wq�N�, A ok e ., J 0 The compliance table below demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the current zoning of POD -1, Planned Office District - 1: * Variance or would require change to PUD The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current use of the site. However, the proposed density is significant, and nearly triples the density allowed on site per the existing Zoning. The recently approved senior housing project at 6500 France Avenue and the Lennar project are the only projects over 50 units per acre. See the table on the following page. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — France Avenue 80 feet 35 +1- feet* Front — 72nd Street 80 feet 25 +1- feet* Side — South 80 feet 9 -35 feet* Rear — West 46 feet 60 feet Building Height Four stories and Six Stories & 80 48 feet feet* Maximum Floor Area .5% 1.88 %* Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 200 — retail 202 spaces 357 enclosed 375 stalls enclosed (residential) Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance or would require change to PUD The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current use of the site. However, the proposed density is significant, and nearly triples the density allowed on site per the existing Zoning. The recently approved senior housing project at 6500 France Avenue and the Lennar project are the only projects over 50 units per acre. See the table on the following page. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 High.Density Development in Edina MEMO w91N�11'� o e�.r O •�M1Yb S6�• Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza . Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn -100 42 The:Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France - Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar 6725 York 240 52 7200 France Project — Proposed 7200 France 195 50 TRAFFIC /SITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. The applicant is proposing a right -in and right -out access on France Avenue, and a full access off 72nd Street. Access to the underground ramps would be off of both France Avenue (for the retail uses) and 72 "d Street (for the housing.) Valet parking is also proposed on France Avenue with a right in and right out. This is an existing condition, but would still need County approval given the increase in the use proposed for the site. MEMO w9SN�1r� o e AFFORDABLE HOUSING The applicant is proposing 20% of the units for affordable housing as part of this project. That would be 39 units towards the City's goal of 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020 with the Met Council. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN As indicated in the project narrative, the applicant is pledging this project to include sustainable design principles. (See page A4.) The applicant has also mentioned the use of solar panels on the roof. COMMPREHENSIVE PLAN This property is located in the OR, Office Residential District in the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan indicates that there are no existing examples of the intended uses for this district within the City. Primary uses are offices, attached or multi - family housing; secondary uses include limited retail and service uses (no big box). "Vertical mixed -use is encouraged and may be required for larger sites." Development guidelines include upgrading existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment, encourage structured parking. This project meets the goals of vertical mixed -use, improved building appearance, improved pedestrian environment, and provides underground parking. Project would also help meet the city's affordable housing goals. PUD The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO o e S 0 c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposed project would incorporate most of the items noted above. Most notably would be the provision of affordable housing, high quality building design, sustainable principles, mixed use, pedestrian oriented design, and transitional building height to the lower density residential area to the west. The applicant has also indicated a willingness to provide a sidewalk connection and playground equipment to the city owned green space on Bristol Boulevard. (Seepages Al -A3.) Additionally, public art is contemplated on the corner of 72nd and France. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 ------- -_ J E I -- 012 �' 7013 70121u 7008 �I AVELLE R--1 E D 7001 _-_ , /0'lE' 7017 7016 ` 7014 4-'C'C' `71GC 7101 � _ 7010 N1AVELLE DRIVE 7104 7105- 7108 "; 7104''102 7101 7100 4001 w 71 G4, (7101 1057104a L-- Y ' 7101 7110 4aaa 7 _ 7108 ;L 7109'7108 _ 116 ?117 J cL f _ _ ``} HAZELTON ROAD 7120 7121 7112 71117112 - — - _. - ..-- -- W 71241 7125711E1 71177116 { - --- � __ s ._ 7128 '�� 7129 7120 W 7121 7120.vt- -7121 7120 7126 f . : 17� 7132 7133171241- 7125 7124 °n 17125 7124 1 I 7171 J :71297128 f 71=6 71 =-7 71261' 71247128 :. i � - u TREET ".VEST 7 2 �— � i7200 7201 7200 1 7201', i x7201; 24 7204 7205 i `{7205; �'" ' 720 7200-- - -r _ !' 17208 7207 II w 7207 l,r'j ' 7209 1 _ _ -�- 7212 7211 - 721 7235 6 7215, 7250 7220i- + 7300 - -- - 7219 17224 -- 7_301 7320 f- 713 [8 r 7 -12 0 _I j1 3621 1-n M 7,16 7333 _`, I �4 �-x7320' i" 7340 cz: 17' -� 7360 - 7;73 Parcel 31- 028 -24 -14 -0001 ID: Owner Name: Parcel 7200 France Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel 3.51 acres Area: 152,751 sq ft A -T -B: Torrens Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. Print Date: 6/19/2014 3501 4 7000 3650 3655 1 13301 7230 _1 i�6 . -''i, , - -a e4 F� J This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Thin6 Green! n� 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 210, Union Plaza, Minneapolis, MN 55401 T. 612.676.2700 F: 612.676.2796 www.djr - inc.com June 16 2014 Cary Teague, Planning Director Planning Department Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Project: Mixed -Use Redevelopment 4. Location: 7200 France Avenue South Subject: Sketch Plan Narrative Proposed Redevelopment: This presentation for Sketch Plan Review is a conceptual design for the redevelopment of the site at 7200 France Avenue South. The proposal is to demolish the existing office building and associated parking and construct a mixed -use redevelopment of approximately 480,000 SF with site improvements and including garage area. The proposed project includes approximately 195 residential units, 26,500 SF of restaurant/retail /office space, and approximately 570 parking spaces. City and Neighborhood Betterment: The proposed redevelopment of this parcel from office to residential and retail uses will benefit the city and area surrounding the project in the following ways: • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial and office sectors (80 %/20% split of market rate to affordable housing) • Provide convenient retail and office uses in the area. • Locates parking within building creating better visual environment for vehicular and pedestrian traffic around the site • Improve the site with more vibrant uses and an attractive building • Create a greener and more environmentally friendly development improving storm water rates through retained green space, green roofs and rain gardens. • Alternative energy options including photovoltaics are being pursued to lower the projects carbon footprint. • Provides small scale neighborhood serving retail. • Add new businesses to the Edina tax base. PUD / Zoning: The project proposes to change the zoning of the site from POD -1 to a PUD using the MDD -6 as a basis for the zoning entitlements. The application for a PUD is based largely around a desire to develop a more pedestrian friendly development, a mixture of uses and a greater density for the site. The proposed building will enclose the vast majority of parking below grade and maintain a 60' -0" setback and existing vegetative buffer from the residential neighborhood to the west. In addition, the site is structured to keep the higher height and density toward France Avenue with the lowest height toward the residential neighborhood. 41� 7200 France Avenue South — Sketch Plan Review Narrative Comprehensive Plan / Greater Southdale Area Land Use and Parking Final Report The current comprehensive plan has recommended office and high density residential uses for this site area and neighborhood from 69th street south to Parklawn (Edge West District) in the Greater Southdale Area Land Use report. In addition, the site is within the Southdale area of mixed -use region around the mall in the character defining areas in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is in keeping with that high density housing concept while keeping the commercial aspects open to office, retail or restaurant uses. The current site size is 3.51 acres (152,751 SF). The proposed development not including garage space is approximately 193,000 SF for a proposed FAR of 1.26. We believe the redevelopment of this site would be an improvement for the city and one that will enhance not only the character of the area, but also the city itself. Sincerely, Sheldon Berg, AIA Principal Cc: Adam Seraphine, NHH Properties Lori Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation 7200 France Avenue South - Sketch Plan Narrative.doc 2 AS- 7200 France Ave S NHH PROPERTIES ' DESIGN : BUILD : MANAGE DJ R APCHITECTURE INC. Site Specifications Dimensions 520.01 X 325.01 Sq Ft 169,008.45 Acres 3.88 Current Site Plan 3 -Story Office Building 135 Surface Level Parking Spaces to the rear of the building w � ,11 9 .4C q I/a BOISCLAIk G0RPt1RA*1 1 u r ''4 r ,P �' °� 4 � 80'"r: ` _ ' � � � � �.- �t�y��� '��a � ��t:� - 46' *d 3`•� - ,rj:w � } p � k � ��, _ ,�.� � to Via. � `� r •� - -.;.. _ 35' \ �4� w r IVI�•�.+, -'•! �t.✓ "'���� -•� - - .r _i yrr� `�' :��}}t_ � AMC F � -. � - ., r June 11, 2014 Sketch Rendering DJR .'' 4�.--2' /j�(����■ _111 _ i� �_ _; ��' � _ :lf� +_� _ u ;' i�_ ��������i • M' r41 � w 1 `s .fill � 1 ,01 'L i � � •A�!� yL�• t�'�b, a� ��+ y i �� wr� � r �`f � � �.. I� F� a ��I i il�'� �,I�S� ;i 1 �r l 4Aaf'I — '�13 .��i....�. .�.! -�� ��.'�. -�! �� J '' � .�. '�o�_-';�ff.+,i"�•,�� /A /✓c- =–s� rr ' =xa3.. z� ��_ �. iuj� . h'.'�7�r _ � `A'� rN %� . =:cam - _✓ . "%��� June 11, 2014 Sketch Rendering DJR PJ2CHIl LCT Wtt: IN(:. 4, la June 11, 2014 Sketch Rendering DJR ARCfIRECTLNtE INC. ell to I 4, la June 11, 2014 Sketch Rendering DJR ARCfIRECTLNtE INC. STFTRA K7�, 9' SETBACK 90' SETBACK DJR ARCHfIL-GIURE' INC. 7200 France Ave S NHH PROPERTIES DESIGN : BUILD: MANAGE Mixed-Use Development BOISCLAILION -1C, C r R P 0 R A I D.J R ARCHITECTURE INC. NHH PROPERTIES DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJR ARCI 11-1 ECTURE. INC. Project Program Summary Uses 170 Luxury Apartments 25 R6w Homes Retail /Restaurant (incl 3,000 mezz) Program Subtotal Parking Grand Total Project Parking Summary Use 170 Apartments 25 Townhomes Use Area (GSF, Incl stairs, elevators, etc) 151,000 SF r 42,600 SF J Q/� `� e 26,500 SF 220,100 3 `I J fl 0 1.41 204,400 SF on 2 levels 424,500 SF Parking Requirement 1.75 per unit (.75 "open ") 2 per unit FA Total Required Total Provided 307 325 50 50 26,500 SF Retail Space - (1) 7,500 Restaurant + 8 per 1,000 SF for retail. Restaurant = 1 per 3 seats + 175/3 = 59 + 25 staff + 19,000 SF Retail 1 per employee no major shift 116 retail = 200 202 557 577* Parking requirements per: Ch 36, Art Xll, Supplementary Dis Regs, Div. 3 - Parking Circulation - Subdivision II Parking Space Parking space size requirement: 8 1/2 x 18 w/24' -0" drive aisle *577 spaces on (2) gargage levels incl 22 spaces on plaza level. �l S /'BO 1� I f1CLlA fI� Row Homes 4 t .. NHH PROPERTIES DJR DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE ARCHITECTURE INC. Site Specifications Dimensions 520.01 X 325.01 Sq Ft 169,008.45 Acres 3.88 a i t /7al3 O' I IF a I If In BQISCLAIk v Courtyard NHH PROPERTIES DJR . • . � DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE ARCHITECTURE INC. r Rendered Man NHH PROPERTIES ' DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. Mezzanine ROW HOUSE TYPE RESIDENTIAL -1 BOISCLAIk ( ; r) N P) R A I I 2nd Floor RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS BOISCLAlk � 3rd Floor / - L.- .- -. NHH PROPERTIES ' DESIGN : BUILD: MANAGE DJR ' -~ <� Parking Lv t i LLLNS N1�.- I- I�H±ItI -I Lill LLLNS N1�.- I- I�H±ItI -I BOISCLAIk C 0 R P 0 R A I I (] I t t 1 t t t s ' t i t RAMP UP " t FRANCE Al 1 BOISCLAIk C 0 R P 0 R A I I (] Parking LvL F2 -C NHH PROPERTIES ' DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC- O e t` Cn e'N�nRPOiW'��9 e IHHH To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. E. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: July 15, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Final Alignment of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Action Requested: Approve the final alignment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Information / Background: The Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) will present the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail ( NMCRT) final alignment to the City Council. This information was presented to both the Edina Park Board and Edina Transportation Commission. Both commissions recommended approval. Please recall that on Dec. 7, 2010, the council approved the trail alignment with the understanding that the final design shall minimize property impacts and be subject to council's approval. The NMCRT portion of the December 7, 2010 council meeting minutes is attached. TRPD has secured $6 million in Federal and State Legacy Grants for the East Segment (east of Tracy Ave.) and is currently seeking federal funds for the West Segment. TRPD has decided to design and construct the trail as one project instead of independently. This approach is estimated to save over 10% in project costs. The entire project is expected to cost $22 million. TRPD has the following timeline for this project: • City Council Review /Approval of Final Trail Design /Alignment July 15, 2014 • Preliminary Engineering Complete September 2014 • Construction Documents December 2014 • Regional Trail Agreement with City Fall 2014 • Out to Bid January 2015 • Construction Begins Early 2015 • Construction Completed Early 2017 • Trail Opens Spring 2017 Attachments: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Edina Alignment Maps Edina Transportation Commission Jun. 19, 2014 Draft Minutes Portion of the December 7, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes G: \PW \INFRAS \AGENCIES \THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT\Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail \City Council R&R \Item VIII. E. Nine Mile Creek Trail City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Contact Information Ownership Group Lori Boisclair Boisclair Corporation 3033 Excelsion Blvd, Suite 215 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Ph: 952.905.2448 Fx: 952.922.3071 lboisclair fdboisclaircorporation.com BoisclairCorporation.com Adam Seraphine NHH Properties 317 2nd Ave S. Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.616.5801 Fx: 952.400.5611 adamfdnhhproperties.com AdamSeraphine.com Project Architect Dean Dovolis DJR Architecture 333 Washington Ave N. Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612.817.0313 Fx: 612.676.2798 ddovolisfddjr- inc.com djr- inc.com NHH PROPERTIES BOISCLAIR DJ R DESIGN': BUILD :'MANAGE,-.' ARCHITECTURE INC. LEGEND -r4ft:Gm PCC.C"L M- &wr 0. ( — pfl: t— # WM WICCL UWF.0 -2n MPO" I'lirceRivers SEHPARK ills 1910 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRCT - NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL X SEGMENT C2-A FILE NO HWY62TO 27099 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL '� '.� -a ,.�� ;r� -�" - i - •-. .. ... � _ l413 H\h}62 rp -IR 1C • � L � '�ti T � `t� -� • .'� ' 4... .. a �.�.. �a..� �, � ,� •�. .t vim' ..��� • /•' i1'ir i i r c 4� � ti • y o (All ] r�- 58001 '`•'a as S ST W ®UA as� fiwa &704 581 •.,,�:.b' ,,.« • : -'�• 581 A y ,� � y,� ',t - _ �Sg AL GRACE TER . • r •• - i f� THREE RIVERS PARK SEGMENT C2 -6 FILE N0. / 1 DISTRICT — NINE MILE EDINA HIGH SCHOOL DATE: SHEET /zreeRivers 127099 YAMA 1 /111N1�1 CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL TO TRACY AVE 6/10/14 9/22 F o\s U — \n 2-9- PLE —S a-s 6/10/2011 ii 44 OZ M ti r s'C �= ♦ ao 1,7, 71f.,. oif s (� 171 - - s ' �' 4 7 • - • /' ��'� ' ` `ah - [s' z r �z •'Rrl"�r . �' �i z IS (�� � #�� s - � -� .,�� -� � �_♦ - .,!%5� .0 log Hwirwp�Y� 3� .1',:; -ter -- � �� i � -� . w r `�• _ s � METRO BLV Q`� O1 M mWr. HIGHWAY 100 r=i O - �' s -. - ,• ,T' �....,.�, _p..r,. NB NWYIj00�Tp:pTH ST W NORMANDALE RD ' �• - - -?^ _ 1 _� e wj I*• F �f �M ' 77 A 11WRpoll IN Lamm, M�.' LEGEND N 1.0 % it Is I If! 2W THREE RIVERS PARK FILE NO. 127 SEGMENT D2-A 127099 DISTRICT - NNE hALE FWY 100 AT LAKE Threeffivers DATE: I SHEET CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL EDINA 5/10/14 1 17/22 SEH .19_\- �-n�_rx.�u 1pL1 s�,�4 .► @".� .v�r� ra8,'S "'oaa'oxs�atrazl tea 4 pSEr i1r� �, "� C � a y / 1 �� rv. - ��, • l• ; ate; *. ,;.. i. - .mfr,i i i„ L vS• !..j f 4 ,■73'" '' f z- 1 ./ .}... iky IA ��4'g5yQ'0• r ry �I � ^r1r• i "yrA,.'y .!^.tli r T' � � 7 �•�1 r�A �I �. Ilk 1 �w� !NC ��v, -•sr w `. Q -c. sr��_ays.:1 VIVO: Eav �� M ' _ _ Ff� �' �• �4 Comm < -i y. p 71 [..{ f.r� a5a a` ,.. -. 15• �!{ Y♦ ri i ✓�_..•�.� 15'�y.�. _ r- r•'t l�; a '^ 741e:, 1 � � � -' T � ...� 7 'a.- 01: FRED i� IUTH AVL END •w `, '�' •■c�► ;M• i 1 C •'.. r . i �' _ - = -tttir t ' n+OrOGCU KUdUL wacrW'E M1 �. r r r 1 F T .' . .iK f . #• a, i� Y�J -.I. e,. ' a ..� i I' • -pi r � Iclr tr cLwn nrarxlr �_ �F � f 1 �Jf � _ , �.w �►..r- •s.n.I. �•' IC7r1+`rC.tlCl041ncT 47J mCFLm _ ' � r , - _ 'i �.�rrr■ 1 • ♦.Y M .�� .i*'7J� , / 1^ THREE RIVERS PARK SECANT D2-8 FILE N0. 1: • ThreeRiverS DISTRICT — NNE MILE LAKE EDNA TO . ........... CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL FRANCE AVE DATE: SHEET I S _110/14 19/22 FINEr Nil ! N T GALLA LR Dli � R Ir 4 ~. 1 1 r nee. JII I, I 11111rMINM' �.. • � • = n � .s �' ' 1 H ST N'. Y •' Y g rlri 1 .I pit INFO yY i t LEGEND COWL= ML NY14lU K(aNLL •.IK TILL � OfY a FWN YIL tlifY 1 . � •, /� 4 o N� •� y NY S Y t+, R Ir 4 ~. 1 1 I, r.- 1 11111rMINM' �.. ,IwMI h Ii I " "� • = n � �' H ST PARKLAWT AVE _ a} THREE RIVERS PARK � I hreeRivers J,v DISTRICT - NINE MILE SEH VARk,11151MI1:1 , ,,,.o CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL "I 74TH ST W N 6 Z 3 .Q=%XvlcN I w, a, v I FILE N0. FRANCE AVE SOUTH 127099 TO DATE: SHEET XFRXFR AVF RCAI RH /70 /t4 2t /12 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7, 2010 the Council would take formal action on the budget and meeting and accept writte until that date SERVICE OF COUNCIL MEMBER H or Hovland described the selfless service of Member Scot , o in his term in office would end after t e The Members and ce responded with a round of applause. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — NINE MILE REGIONAL TRAIL CREEK -BASED ALIGNMENT APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mayor Hovland made an opening statement on issues related to the proposed Nine Mile Regional Trail, acknowledging there were opinions both in support of and against a creek -based alignment. He indicated the Council would respectfully listen to resident's testimony and act with integrity. Park and Recreation Director Keprios provided a presentation detailing the historical background and consideration of the Nine Mile Regional Trail. He advised of the benefits of the proposed walking /biking trail, which would be at the expense of the Three Rivers Park District. Mr. Keprios then presented the rationale used by the Parks Board to formulate its recommendation to approve a creek -based route for the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail subject to five restrictions and conditions. He presented the timeline for the trail project should it be approved by the Council, noting the City would have the opportunity for input during the construction document phase. Mr. Keprios thanked all residents and Commissions that provided input and Three Rivers Park District staff for their responsiveness and professionalism during this process. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Public Testimony Aliya Johnson, 5844 St. Johns Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Ted McKlveen, 5261 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Matt Rock, 4515 Casco Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Austyn Blair Neuman -Shaw, 4238 Grimes Avenue S., addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Craig Zachman, 6624 Limerick Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to 'a creek -based trail. Bob Schwartzbauer, 6107 Waterford Court, addressed the Council in opposition to a Segment 3 road - based trail. Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Richard Johnson, 5700 Tucker Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Nancy Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, addressed the Council in support of constructing a barrier in the western side of Segment 19. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7, 2010 Mike Platterer, 4304 Branson Street, representing the Edina Energy and Environmental Commission, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Ken Kadash, 6110 Waterford Court, addressed the Council in opposition to a Segment 3 road -based trail. Harvey Johnson, 5505 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail and submitted a survey of 750 residents also in opposition. Andrew Heyer, 5717 Deville Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Greg Frey, 6021 Killarney Lane S., addressed the Council in opposition to a trail. Jeff Werbalowsky, 6000 Fox Meadow Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Robert Lubar, 6619 Londonderry Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail and submitted a petition of 160 signatures in opposition. Tom La Force, 5901 Tingdale Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Paul Ratelle, 5521 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Jessica Hulbert, 4601 Park Commons Drive, former resident, addressed the Council in support of a creek - based trail. Loren Vorlicky, 7060 Cahill, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Pat Corcoran, 4121 Monterey Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. James Hildebrand, 6808 Brook Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Diane Fansler -Wald, 5709 West 66`h Street, addressed the Council in support of an off -road trail and opposition to road based trail in Segment 7. Brad Scaeppi, 4600 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. David Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Dan Atkins, 6812 Chapel Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Jan Moe, 6519 Creek Drive, addressed the Council regarding trail adjacent property values. Mary Lilja, 5809 McGuire Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Mary Ross, 312 Harrison, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Katherine Bass, 6917 Gleason Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Bjorn Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Lori Richman, 5828 Ewing Avenue S., addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7, 2010 Tami Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Vasanti Mudkanna, 5717 Deville Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Fritz Corrigan, 6509 Biscayne Boulevard, addressed the Council in opposition to a trail. Craig Jarvinen, 4351 Parkview Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. James Moe, 6519 Creek Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Carl Follstad, 5709 Bernard Place, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Pam Johnson, 5505 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to the lack of process. Peter Kelley, 4020 Inglewood Avenue, representing the Bike Edina Task Force, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Dan Peterson, 6520 Creek Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Raymond O'Connell, 4612 Valley View Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Marilyn Reilly, 6600 Londonderry Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Pat Fletcher, 5137 Halifax Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. James Peterson, 6520 Creek Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Laurie Chapman, 6420 Aspen Road, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Carl Gulbronson, 7200 York Avenue, addressed the Council in support of creek based trail. David Gepner, 6845 Penn Avenue, Richfield resident, addressed the Council in support of a regional trail. Pat Teynor, 5525 Malibou Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Diane Plunkett- Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Alice Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Judith Martin, 5232 West 70th Street, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked Three Rivers Park District representatives to address questions raised during public testimony. Jonathan Vlaming, Three Rivers Park District, described their public safety division and patrols Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7, 2010 conducted on an irregular schedule. The trails would close November 15 through March 31 unless the City wanted the trails to remain open and took responsibility for maintenance. Cris Gears, Three Rivers Park District Superintendent, clarified the Council was being asked to select a trail route with the understanding that construction would be several years into the future. If approved, the District would work closely with the City in creating the construction plans and would obtain all funding from various agencies including the District's tax revenues by issuing bonds. He advised that Legacy Funds were available for trails of regional or State significance. He assured the Council that if approved there would be no special assessment against Edina properties and the District would not enter into an agreement binding the City to construction of the trail or to grant easements until the final alignment was agreed to and all funding was in place. Mr. Gears advised that the Park District had no intention to require parking construction and any parking solution would be done in full cooperation with the city. Mr. Vlaming indicated the next grant funding cycle would be March through June, 2011, and if successful in obtaining grants, construction would be in 2015 and 2016. Boe Carlson, Three Rivers Park District, addressed homes that were in close proximity to the trail, and assured the Council the District would work closely with the City and residents, on a one -on -one basis, to determine an acceptable proximity threshold and how the trail would be implemented to minimize impact through vegetation and physical materials. He explained that some cities permit a "patchwork" solution while others preferred a uniform aesthetic. Should a dispute over buffering arise, the Park District would work with the property owner to resolve the issue and had, in some cases, removed fences when the property owners felt they were no longer necessary. The Council asked whether the Park District would provide screening if the house was located 150 feet from the trail. Mr. Carlson stated the Park District would work closely with the City to identify those "pinch points," determine the threshold, and look at all considerations. In addition, neighborhood design meetings would be scheduled during the development process to identify those issues at the front end so such locations were known prior to the final design stage. With regard to public safety, Mr. Carlson indicated the Park District had over 100 miles of regional trail through Hennepin County that experienced two million annual visitors. Predominantly, conflicts were user related versus public safety instances. It was noted that Park District publi safety officers patrol the trail system and the District was on the Hennepin County 911 system so it recei ed calls at the same time and responded immediately. The Council asked whether an agreement had been reached, on a preliminary basis, regarding construction of a sound protective fence along the north bound ramp to TH100. Mr. Vlaming stated the sound barrier wall had been discussed for over two years and the City could require a reasonable sound wall or fence barrier as a condition in the Cooperative Trail Agreement. However, it would be preferable if all neighbors along that stretch were in agreement and it appears that was already the case. Mr. Vlaming addressed the boardwalk design, describing it to be 12 feet wide and of varied height determined by a technical team but was generally three feet above flowing water, similar in appearance to Luce Line boardwalks. The Park District was still considering surfacing options and had hired a sound engineer to gather data on the level of sound generated. The Park District would remove debris if on the boardwalk. It was noted that residents had cleaned debris after high water events. Mr. Gears reaffirmed that the Three Rivers Park District would not construct any regional trail that does not meet the City's needs and approval. The consideration tonight was approval of a trail corridor and concerns expressed would be addressed during the design process. Mr. Vlaming stated the Park District had provided a fact sheet regarding how trails influence property values that cited analysis of a study Page 5 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /December 7.2010 prepared for Hennepin County Public Works involving four regional trails. It was generally found there was a bonus to the property that increased as the home neared the trail. Clara Schlichting, Planner with Bonestroo, addressed the Council's questions regarding the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). She explained Bonestroo had conducted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) which determined there were environmental effects but none significant enough to warrant the preparation of an EIS. The EAW was voluntary and found existing corridor conditions had been significantly impacted over time by residential construction, storm water practices, lawn chemicals and removal of natural vegetation. Issues determined would be subject to ongoing regulatory authority and dealt with during the design process. The EAW and record of decision also recognized several mitigation strategies to minimize impact on heritage mature trees. Ms. Schlichting advised the Three Rivers Park District had a history of mitigating and replacing trees in close proximity or where a larger tree was removed. The Council questioned the issue of liability should an injury occur on the trail. Attorney Knutson explained it was a nonissue if there was no negligence and, in any event, the trail would be owned by Three Rivers Park District, not the City. With regard to the comment about "form over function" and consideration of other segments deemed to have merit, Mr. Keprios explained that the consulting firms had identified several different routes but the route under consideration was felt to be the most beneficial and likely -to -be -used alignment. He advised that should the City want to consider alternate routes, it would be at the City's expense. Mr. Keprios noted the Three Rivers Park District had also studied the Canadian Pacific rail line for over a year but would need the cooperation of Canadian Pacific Railway to make that happen and so it was on the longer - term drawing board. Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Watershed District Administrator, explained how the Nine Mile Creek restoration project would interface and coordinate with simultaneous construction activities of the proposed trail to minimize disturbance. Mr. Bigalke stated that cost savings were possible should the same contractor be used for some of both restoration and trail work. It was noted the Creek restoration project would result in a more efficient system to move flood waters and create an ecologically sound amenity for the City, residents, and wildlife. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve a creek -based route for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail with the following restrictions and conditions: 1. Keep the trail on the south side of Walnut Ridge Park. 2. That Three Rivers Park District makes all reasonable efforts in the engineering /design phase to minimize boardwalk noise and height. 3. That Three Rivers Park District offers to provide homeowners with principle residences adjacent to the proposed regional trail edge the option to have buffers where reasonable and at Three River's expense. Buffer options are fencing or vegetative screening (trees, shrubs). 4. That Three Rivers Park District take reasonable steps to minimize the amount of boardwalks in the complex balancing act that also attempts to minimize the impact on the environment (wetlands, water quality, and vegetation). S. Place a time limit deadline on the easements offered to Three Rivers Park District to complete the project within a reasonable time frame. A reasonable time limit should be negotiated with Three Rivers Park District and that language should be included in the easement agreement. 6. That the final design shall minimize property impacts and be subject to Council approval. 7. That a reasonable sound wall be constructed for Segment 19 that was satisfactory to the City. Page 6 S Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 The Council• discussed that this project would involve -phased construction and funding cycles so• more information was needed to determine a reasonable timeframe when easements should be returned to the City if the trail was not constructed. ' The Council agreed that the Jntention was clear in the self imposed condition by the Park District that a reasonable time limit would be negotiated and that language would be included in the easement agreement. '. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — 2011 LIQUOR LICENSE FEES Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered p ed n file. Cit lerk Mangen explained Minnesota Statutes require the City to hold a public he g after 30 -day notice license holders of its intention to raise liquor license fees. She presented t 011 liquor license fees, no 'that the 3.2 Beer on and off sale and temporary 3.2 beer lice s were the only fees proposed t e increased. Ms. Mangen advised that licensed beverage cater icenses.were granted by the State of esota,Public Safety Department and not individual cities. Mayor Hovland ope d the public hearing at 10:44 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comet Member Swenson made a moti seconded by Mem r Brindle, to close the public'hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, S son, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — 2011 ONE TON F450 D TRUCK — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded ,.' ember Swenson awarding-the bid for 2011 one -ton F450 Ford truck, Park Maintenance Depart t, to a recommended low bidder, Midway Ford Fleet Sales at $35,175.38. Motion carried on rollcall vote — fi ayes. *AWARD OF BID — ONE FIRE GINE PUMPER— GENE L SAFETY FIRE APPARATUS ROSENBAUER) Motion made by Member B nett and seconded by Mem Swenson awarding the bid for one fire engine /pumper, for,the E a Fire Department, to the recom nded low bidder, General Safety Fire Apparatus (Rosen bauer) 92;003.00 Motion carried on rol A Il vote —five ayes. *AWARD OF BID THREE SPORT UTILITY SUPPORT VEHICLES POLAR CHEVROLET — FIRE DEPARTMENT Motio/ION ember Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awardi the bid 'for three sport utility icles for the Fire Department to the recommended low bid Polar Chevrolet at $102,7 Moti rollcall vote -five ayes. RESOL 2010 -116 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayo\Resoluti that ' order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopteap oved by four favorable votes of the'Council accepting the donations. Member moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -116 accepting various donations.. Member Swensn r onded the motion. Rollcall: Page 7 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM JUNE 19, 2014 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Olson, Spanhake, and Whited. ABSENT Members Sierks, Van Dyke. ' LtP�VAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion we by member LaForce and seconded by member Jano ove the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Motion was made by me anovy and seconded by 15, 2014. All vote . Motion carried. C NITY COMMENT— None. ar-Boettge to approve the amended minutes of May REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Final Alignment Update Mr. Eric Nelson and Mr. Jonathan Vlaming from Three Rivers Park District sought approval for Edina's segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail final alignment. Mr. Nelson said the alignment is the same as was presented on Apr. 17 with more definitive details worked'out along the route 'as follow: • The trail will be a sidewall�on Smetana until it is reconstructed and a bike lane will be added; • They are in discussion with,the County on the Gleason Rd segment where the County has a designated 5 -ft shoulder for a bike lane; they are proposing a multi -use trail on the east side of Gleason; • In Bredesen Park, the existing trail will be widened to 10 -ft and become a two -way, currently a one -way trail; • The school board approved the alignment that runs on district property after changes were made so the ski trail would not be impacted; ' • They are in discussion with City staff about ways to make the intersection at Tracy Ave and Valley View Rd safer; • At 70th St by the railroad crossing, they are going to have an underpass under 70th because of flooding concerns and are in discussion with City staff regarding use of a piece of City -owned land; • They are in discussion with MNDOT staff to put the trail in their right -of -way on the eastside of TH -100; • From MNDOT's right -of -way, the trail meanders behind Burgundy Place (working with owners for an easement) and along the edge of Fred Richards Golf Course to Parklawn (in 2016 Parklawn is scheduled to be reconstructed similar to Gallagher Dr); • 77 property owners along the trail were surveyed regarding screening and to date, 32 responded and they've selected all the options available from no screening, vegetation, chain link or wood fence; no single option was selected more than another. During discussion, they were asked how property values are affected by a nearby trail and Mr. Warning said studies show that property values are not reduced and realtors will often refer to the nearby trail as a selling point. Regarding parking, they said they are going to wait and address this based on needs, same as they did with the Dakota Rail Trail. Approvals to date include Park Board (6/10) and School Board (6/16) and they plan to present to City Council on 7/1. Preliminary design will begin in the fall with final design completed in the winter. Construction on the east half is expected to begin in 2015 and the entire trail completed by 2017. Total project cost is $20M and secured funds to date include a $6.2M grant, plus Three Rivers District's contribution of $8M. They are confident that they will be approved for federal funds for the rest of the project when application opens this fall. Mr. Vlaming said the board will decide later on if the project is built in stages or if they'll need to pledge money to build it all at once. Contact for the project is Jason McGrew King, 763 - 559 -6779 or JMcGrew; Kine threeriversparkdistrict.ore. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by mem'berJanovy to approve the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail alignment with the understanding that it could change as the property that is now Fred Richards Golf Course is redeveloped. All voted aye. Motion carried. iscussion with Edina Public Works Director , Mr. Olson described the public works department as multi- faceted with divisions that include ele c, HVAC, facilities, u 'es, asphalt and concrete streets, parks maintenance, etc. He said the streets divisio ew is responsible for g mill and overlays, pothole repairs;. concrete street repairs and also assis h bike lane striping. He said all employee low snow and their biggest challenge this past winter where saw two distinct winters. He said their go s to have the streets plowed within 6 =8 hours of a snow f ut sidewalks can take up to two days. In addition to stye maintenance, they also maintain approximately 4 hletic fields, lift stations, sanitary and storm sewers; Ovate ains, etc. Mr. Olson said public works workcloseIV . the engineering depar ent on things like mill and overlay, bike lane striping, and they recently drafted a new cross i Ik standard; he nked the ETC for their input on the crosswalk standard. . Mr. Olson was asked how public works, respond to den uestions and concerns and he said questions or concerns can come to the department via the site's 'Repor Problem' or the new'Edina To Go' mobile application. He said these are tied directly heir work order syst . There is also an FAQ online. He said everything they do is about quality public service he welcomes feedback and ut. Mr. Olson was asked how the ecide when to repair or not to repair a pothole . said this is a delicate balance because in the winter m ,5ptfs the asphalt mixes does not stay very long which mean ultiple applications. Chair Bass said w' the Living Streets Policy they are trying to meet the needs of all residents, ding non - drivers, /Mr. outes to School plan was just approved by City Council. She asked if sidewalk plow1n prioritized said they are not because they only plow County and State Aid streets. He said the France e xample, has to be plowed multiple times because the City plows and the County puts the sno ack the street. He said because of this, they prefer boulevard style sidewalks where they have so said they have four 5 -ft wide sidewalk plows ($110,000 per plow). 2 to] . 905 10A I NO 97 10� ``41�17r v ,CORPOAASfe. ' BBB To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. F. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion, ❑ Date: July 15, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -77 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -77 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -77 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a .resolution_ of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following, listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Edina Public Works Department: Edina Garden Council $2,300 Dated: July 15, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Flowers For Edina Veterans Memorial & Arneson Park James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 15, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of l City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. w91N�,1� H� '� y v � • ,NCORPO"', • 1886 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ William S. Goldenberg 25 Woodland Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 952- 927 -6097 hlcgoldynQaol.com July 1, 2014 Mr. Scott Neal, City Manager City of Edina 4.801 West 50 "' Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Reconstruction of Woodland Road Dear Mr. Neal: I want to "second" everything written to you by my next door neighbor, Bob Christianson, in his'letters to you on both June 13 `and June 29, 2014. Each year, the condition of the street gets worse. This year, between the tremendous amount of rain and normal sprinkling of the lawns, the street,ih front of our house has never been dry and the pot holes have never been so large or- so deep. If your reply to Bob's first letter is the final word for this year, I propose that the real estate taxes for every home on Woodland Road be reduced by $2000 per year until.the street is rebuilt. .That is the approximate price of the new set of tires we each have to buy for our two automobiles every year do to the inexcusable condition of Woodland Road. Yours very truly, William S. Goldenberg Cc: Mayor amPC Hove and, Robert J. Christianson, Dr. Stephen.Sundberg, Thomas Halvorson, Richard Jensen, Dr. Donald Lewin, B. J. Turner and Carl Geisz Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Public Information Meeting and Open House Lake Harriet Area Regional Sewer Rehabilitation Project Wednesday, July 9, 2014 — 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. Pershing Recreation Center, 3523 W. 48th St., Minneapolis Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), operator of the metro -area wastewater collection and treatment system, will hold a public information meeting and open house to discuss upcoming rehabilitation work on aging and deteriorating regional sanitary sewers in the Lynnhurst and Fulton Neighborhoods of Minneapolis. The project also will affect a small portion of the northeastern part of Edina. I Public Information Meeting and Open House Details: Time/Date: 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 9, 2014 Location: Pershing Recreation Center, 3523 W. 48"' St. (corner of 481h St. and Chowen Ave.) Format: A formal presentation and question- and - answer session will begin at 6:45 p.m. The remainder of the time will be an open house format. MCES staff and consultants will use maps to show where work on the regional sanitary sewers will be done, will describe how and when the work will take place, and will discuss potential impacts and efforts to mitigate the impacts. Where and When Will the Work Take Place? Regional sewer rehabilitation project areas are located as follows (see enclosed map): • Along Knox Ave. — from just north of 50'" St. to 51 n St.: June to August 2014. • West of Lake Harriet — portions of 47"' St. (west of Washburn Ave.), portions of 48"', 49th and 50' Sts., and portions of York, Zenith, Drew and France Aves.: July to September 2014. • Along and near Lake Harriet — 47h St. east of Washburn Ave., Lake Harriet Pkwy. from 47th St. to Knox Ave., and Knox Ave. from Lake Harriet Pkwy. to just north of 50th St: December 2014 to February 2015. • Along Minnehaha Creek from Knox Ave. to Girard Ave.: December 2014 to February 2015. Regional sewer replacement project areas are located as follows (see enclosed map): • 47h St. from Washburn Ave. to the alley to the alley between Washburn and Vincent Aves.: November 2014 • 49th St. from Chowen Ave. to the alley between Chowen and Drew Aves.: December 2014 How Will the Work Be Done? Both the sewer replacement and the sewer rehabilitation work will require diversion of wastewater through temporary pipes that generally will be above ground, but they will be buried at driveway entrances and roadway crossings. Except as allowed by the Minneapolis Traffic Department, these temporary sewer pipes will not block any roadways. Small excavations will be needed at all maintenance holes and at several additional locations for the temporary sewer pipes. The sewer replacement work on small sections of 47th St. and 49`h St. will Involve excavation and removal of the old sewer pipe and maintenance holes, installation of new support piling, installation of new sewer pipes and maintenance holes, and restoration of affected street, sidewalk and landscape areas. The affected sections of these streets will need to close while the work is taking place. WTROPOLITAN Legend I " - 1- MN i CIPP Lined � I've g C 1 Wasfaat _ - N BmMwaod iq P e. I " c 4 Q " • I -MNa44 elrveluree - -' Facts A _ -_- Neighborhood L4nft a Linden Hills '�,Eaeamonte ' - � ' - - ._r._._ Overall Length = 14,400 feet 1 300 feet `[ Lake Harriet Area Regional Sewer Rehabilitation Protect Brown — Caldwell Number of MHs = 97 Inch Pipe Sizes = 9" - 40" W ath st Pipe and MH Rcplacatnunt g ' 1 MNa 4a Lake Harriet ! � --- -- --- ------ - - -- - - ; � / Y W'. - WOW& - - Wlaer St Q \ ' }etN \._ ��_` -.... _. _- yam•- �..e . , WISth St Pipe and MH Replacefnant •� P- ..h1n9 Parts i jj N - i W49th St - i WISM Sf W IWh St " Q S ! Q Lynnhurst i Fulton " Q g e S Q waterst 8 3 I Q N Qc ws e i a S sarm.stw Legend c " W 6W St v " 1- MN 3 u CIPP Lined � I've g C 1 waardst M.E. Interwplon BmMwaod iq P e. I " c 4 Q " • I -MNa44 elrveluree - -' _ -_- Neighborhood L4nft - '�,Eaeamonte ' - � • °�- •_._._._._._._._. W6rN et .- ._._.- _____�_,,,.,_. -------- .- •--- .-- _-- .- ..--- �.�_•_�_ - - ._r._._ ._._.__�_._._._._._._._._._._._ `[ Lake Harriet Area Regional Sewer Rehabilitation Protect Brown — Caldwell p1Lo Ir0 tAN Heather Braniain From: kimcheedavis @comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 11:28 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West To: Mayor Hovland Edina City Council Members RE: 66 West, affordable housing for young adults in Edina We are long time residents of Edina. Meredith grew up here, graduated from Edina High school, and she and I have lived here since 1992. I am a child /adolescent/ adult psychiatrist who has had an office on Drew Avenue, and 65th street in Edina since approximately 1995. We are members of Edina Community Lutheran Church. Through my work as a psychiatrist, and through Meredith's work in education, most recently Principal of a middle school, we are familiar with challenges faced by youth. Our youth face challenges of abuse, drug use, neglect. We are also well aware of the challenge and problems of homelessness. Older adolescents /young adults who have no place to call 'home', are moving from 'friends' house to house, or sleeping in our parks, etc. As an early morning dog walker at Rosland Park, I have observed people sleeping on benches and tents and tarps in the wooded areas. These folks are very vulnerable, and it is our responsibility as citizens to address this and provide services and security for them when possible. Having lived and worked very near to the Southdale area, we are well aware of the advantages of this location, with access to health care, transportation and job opportunities. We firmly believe that all communities, Edina included, need to 'step up' and work at providing affordable housing for young people. It will clearly benefit them, and thus the larger community, us. We strongly encourage the City of Edina and its leadership to support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. I have spoken with a number of my colleagues in the Drew Office, and they are supportive as well. Thank you for taking on this wonderful opportunity Sincerely, William and Meredith Davis 6616 Cornelia Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 Heather Branigin From: Michele Home <janethuyl @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 20141:23 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West To Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council My name is Michele Steinke and I am a resident of Edina (4825 Rutledge Av). I am a member of Colonial Church and my children attend SouthView Middle school and the High School. Our family has.volunteered often with Families Moving Forward at our church. Families from around the twin cities who experience homelessness are able to stay together by living week to week in congregations. We have witnessed the strength of these families who often.fall out of secure housing by no fault of .their own. And we have seen the dignity that comes as they receive the help they need to get back onAheir feet. My husband and I worked at a treatment center in Colorado for at risk teens. Many of these teens left stable (or unstable) housingas a result of abuse and neglect. It was healthier for them to be out of a house than in the environment they were in. Most of these teens would couch hop as long as they were able, but without support and guidance, the street life would often lead to criminal acts either perpetrated by or against these youth. Having a place for teens to get the help they need and learn the skills they need to live on'their own not only is a just thing to do, but it will help in the long run to not perpetuate the cycle of abuse, addiction and crime. I am proud that 66 West is the location Beacon is looking at and agree the area it is in will be ideal for'housing, jobs and transportation. I'm proud that Edina can offer the kind of support needed in the southwest metro for kids facing horrible situations - and be a place of hope and opportunity for them. As a member, of Colonial.Church, I was extremely disappointed in our recent land sale and development to a for profit organization with no support from the city to increase affordable housing. Edina is a great community to live in, a first ring suburb with excellent schools, job opportunities in retail, food industry, health care, education, etc. I love the diversity that has grown in Edina and feel our community is on the cutting edge to be a place of opportunity not only for the wealthy and. educated, butfor the immigrant, the low income senior, and now, the teens who need.a place to call home so they can move forward as productive members of our society. I ask that you support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. Thank you. Sincerely, Michele Steinke 952- 922 -3944 Sent from my iPad Heather Branigin From: Huppert, Sheri < Sheri.Huppert@courts.state.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 2:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West -- Affordable Housing in Edina Good Afternoon, Mayor Hovland: My name is Sheri Huppert, and my husband Boyd and I have been fortunate to live in Edina the past 18 years. We purchased a cape cod at 5600 Bernard Place in Edina. Boyd got a job at KARE -11 and we moved from Milwaukee. We had heard of the excellent schools in Edina and decided to buy a house in this community to raise our sons. I was a bit reluctant to move here, as Edina has a reputation of residents who are smug about their wealth. Yet, we have found our neighbors to be caring and kind people. I am writing in support of the 66 West Affordable Housing Development. Please consider changing the zoning laws to support this project. 66 West is a wonderful location as it is close to jobs at Southdale and Metro Transit Bus Service. My church, Christ the King, has been active with Beacon in promoting 66 West. Last year, I heard a young woman speak at a Beacon meeting. She told of running away from an abusive home and still attended Edina High School. She went to Southdale Food Court and worked on homework till closing. Then she boarded a Metro Transit bus and tried to sleep during the evening hours. Everything she owned was shoved into a backpack. It broke my heart to hear of a child alone in this world with no one offering support and love. Yet, couldn't we be the people who support and love these young adults? Our children have every opportunity in the world because they were lucky enough to be born to parents who can provide for all their needs. Can we sleep at night, knowing these teenagers are out on the streets? Yes, we are a community known as smug Cake Eaters. But, lets show everyone in the Twin Cities our generous Edina hearts and support 66 West. Thank you for all you do in our community. With gratitude, Sheri Huppert Government Documents Librarian Minnesota State Law Library 651- 296 -8043 Email: sheri.huppert @courts.state.mn.us Heather Branigin . From: WinnieandSteve Martin <martins6012 @9,mail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014.6:00 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Ann Kattreh; Susan Faus; Scott Neal Subject: Council Mtg. 7/1 Follow up My name is Winnie Martin and I was at the meeting on 7/1 when you and Manager Neal discussed the Equine Proposal. I am a resident of Edina and one of the "people" behind the Equine Proposal. First, I feel badly that this idea was never vetted, in person, over a formal process to our Council. The importance for you to understand with complete clarity to.move forward with discussion should•have been addressed prior to your 7/1 decision. I feel like we tried, but clearly we didn't try hard enough Second, as a resident of Edina, and for the record not a horseback rider, I wanted to clarify a few points. It's after the fact, but I feel it important, nonetheless. Member Bennett - to your, point about the gentleman who wore the Save the Fred hat and wanted his family to be able to use this space .... his daughter would have been able to sign up for riding lessons, hayrides and volunteer opportunities for therapeutic riding. She could have used this for after school riding, or summer camp. Member Brindle - to your point that we wanted to use public land for private enterprise.... there was discussion early on that Community Lessons could be. showcased as riding "shows," or there could be some involvement on behalf on the Minnesota Jumpers Association to showcase the sport to raise money to support the not -for- profit venture side of this, We Can Ride, and potentially Erik's Ranch. Somehow this turned into "trailers of 400 ormore every weekend in our backyard. This couldn't be further from our vision. Our Edina Public School Autism rates are soaring and our disabled population in our community is underserved. This would have been a unique opportunity•to serve our population, and showcase our community for taking care of it's future residents and families. Member. Swenson - to your point about keeping the park for full residential use .... we couldn't agree more. We continue to have a broader vision for the park; therapeutic riding, community riding, urban farm, multi- seasonal trails, park pavilions and picnic areas, green space /green protection from impending Pentagon Park and for the neighbors, mini soccer fields (like the ones at Chowen - elementary play fields, not game athletic fields) and situationally located play areas in each quadrant .....just to name a few. Member Sprague - to your point about multi-use and natural beauty please see my comments above for Member Swenson, but in regards to natural beauty: This plan was for a state of the art, "Kentucky blue grass preserving," beautiful property. The, residents of Edina would expect nothing less, and our vision was of something beautiful, as well as useful. . Mayor Hovland - to your point about what is the best use of this property? Take your time and do this right. You hit the nail on the head. The importance to look beyond Edina for this land is essential. Our models and proposals were based on other communities and other repurpose projects. We modeled our Equine model after numerous Golf Course Repurpose and Urban Projects...... many of which I have sent you by email. In retrospect, I should have shown you, and all members, in person. Thank you for your service and for your time. I will speak for myself and for many other We Can Ride Volunteers in Edina when I say we are truly sorry for not clarifying our vision and working with you as a team, as a, group, more closely. Our efforts have_ been,to not only gain momentum for our cause, but to reach out for more community- involvement. We:put together '& survey that we continue to receive feedback through in efforts to help provide more information to you, and the City. http: / /wecanrideiiiedina.or survey s /ind6x.php /272436/lang-en We all live herein Edina and truly want what is best for Edina. Winne Martin www.weeanrideinedina.org https:// www .facebook.com/wecanrideinedina . z Heather. Branigin From: dacool @comcast.net Sent: Thursday, July 03, 201412:26 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Support for 66West: Affordable Housing for Young Adults in Edina To Mayor Hovland and Members of Edina City Council: My name is David Couillard, and Hive at Creekside Condominiums on 7100 Metro Blvd. in Edina. I am writing in support of Beacon Interfaith Housing Cooperative's proposal to build "66 West Apartments" at 33 West 66th Street, to provide housing for 39 young people experiencing homelessness in Edina and other nearby suburbs. Social workers from Hennepin County and various other organizations estimate that 200 -300 young adults between the ages of 18 -22 from'the southwest suburbs experience homelessness at any given time. When they find themselves homeless, it is usually because leaving home seems safer than staying with their family. Reasons may include parental violence, drug or alcohol abuse (by young people, their parents, or both), intolerance of a child's sexual orientation, or significant financial problems causing family stress: The purpose of 66 West is not to serve as a homeless shelter, but to be an affordable apartment building designed for long-term, tenants focused on their education and careers. Tenants must sign a lease, pay rent, and follow property management rules. Applicant screening will include criminal background checks. The 66 West apartments will have the basic rules of all apartment buildings regarding noise (keep music volume down), garbage disposal, and cleanliness. Smoking, taking drugs, and drinking alcohol will not be allowed in the building. Tenants who do not meet the. expectations and community guidelines may be asked to leave. Beacon has successfully created supportive housing for young adults at Nicollet Square in the Kingfield neighborhood of South Minneapolis using a similar model. Tenants are successfully achieving educational and career goals and move into stable housing after a year or two there. The Kingfield Neighborhood Association is a strong supporter of Nicollet Square. I have participated in Beacon's "Families Moving -Forward" program, when my congregation, Richfield United Methodist Church, hosted several homeless families. I was impressed by Beacon's stress on helping families become self - sufficient rather than just providing food and shelter to meet their immediate crisis. I would be proud to have the City of Edina approve Beacon's 66 West project, and help our community's young people grow into responsible citizens with support when they need it the most. I urge you to approve the 66 West proposal when it comes before the Edina City Council on August 4, 2014. Sincerely, David T. Couillard Heather Branigin From: Bill McCarthy <mccarthy @minneapolisunions.org> Sent: 'Thursday, July 03, 2014.2:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Meeting Request Mayor Hovland, I am requesting a meeting with you to discuss various construction projects in your City.. Representatives of the Laborers Union and myself will be available to meet at your convenience. I look forward to meeting with you. Bill William McCarthy President Minneapolis Regional Labor Federation, AFL -CIO 312 Central Ave. S.E. Suite 542 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612) 379 -4206 (612) 267 -0028 Cell www.minneapolisunions.org i Heather. Braniain From: Kurt <fromkurt@live.c6m> Sent: Friday, July 04, 201411:56 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: To: Mayor James Hovland Just as there is an Edina Police Chaplain, there should be an Edina Fire /Ambulance Therapy Dog. The dog could live in the fire station. Different people need different kinds of comforting. 1 Heather°Braniain From: Jan Mattox <janmattox @earthlink.net> sent: Saturday, July 05 2014 11:44 AM To: Edina Mail cc: Dylan Subject: 66 West advocacy, Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council: My name is Jan Mattox. I have been a resident of Richfield since 1964 and am still residing in my home at 7114 Knox Avenue South. I was a teacher in the Richfield Schools for many years. I have been an active member of Plymouth Congregational Church since 1970,and have been involved with Lydia Apartments since it was founded 10 years ago by the Plymouth Neighborhood Foundation which is now Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. When my husband and I moved into Richfield, young professionals moved into their first homes here and.left after a few years. Today that is not the case. Over the years, the whole structure of the suburb has changed: 'I've watched it happen in my neighborhood and was certainly made aware of the change in the school system over the years. Coming from a stable, safe home environment, our three children all graduated from the Richfield Schools and have gone on to become very productive members of society, all of them receiving a college education. At that time, this was the expectation. As I have talked with teachers presently in the system,'through the years the climate has definitely changed. Many young people now live in situations that make the future, as well as present day living, very uncertain. For this reason, I am supportive of 66 West. I think it will benefit young adults and meet an important need in this area. I am excited about the location because of its nearness to job opportunities, transportation and services that can be used by the young people in order to facilitate success. I sincerely hope that Edina and its leadership will support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. Sincerely, Jan Mattox, Richfield resident since 1964 and former sixth grade teacher. 1 Heather Braniain From: Louis G. DeMars <lou @louisdemars.com> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 8:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 7100 Metro Blvd Hello Council members. I live at 7100 Metro Blvd along with about 170 other people. I have been asked by one of our codo association board members to get to the facts regarding the Three River Park District plan to building a long ago planned bicycletwalking trail along our property line on 70th street and Metro, Blvd. I did meet with staff from the park district last week to confirm their plan. It is. my understanding that the Edina City council needs to vote yet on something but I don't know what that is. It also is my understanding that in order to build this trail our association needs to grant an easement to make the trail a reality. I have only been here for four years and have not been notified of any meeting by the park district or the Edina City council. We are asking for a meeting with the, appropriate staff or elected officials or both to understand why the current plan is being implemented, when it was approved and when were notices sent to affected property owners. We are not happy with the current plan and understand that the trail is going to be built but we need to find out what the alternative plans are that would least affect our property. . Additionally we believe the plan is a dangerous plan with over 120 residences going and coming every day right over the trail. We also have many visitors who would be crossing the trail. Early in the morn ing:'and after ,4 PM Metro blvd is.very crowded with people either coming to work or going home. Put thaftogether with the people using the day care. center across the street and the vehicles leaving the Regis corporation parking lot we will have an unmanageable traffic issue to contend with in addition to any bicyclers using the trail. Before the wrong facts get out that may cause further confusion please contact me so that we can get the: facts correct and resolve our concerns. Thank you, Lou DeMars DeMars Consulting 7100 Metro Blvd #212 Edina, MN 55439 lou@louisdemars.com 612- 968 -0720 DEDICATED TO PUBLIC SAFETY RICHARD W. STANEK HENNEPIN Coumy SimwFF July 2, 2014 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55428 Dear Mayor Hovland: Thank you for including me on the agenda at the July 1, 2014, meeting of the Edina City Council. The cities within Hennepin County are all unique in their respective public safety needs and challenges, and the time I spent at this meeting allowed me to hear first -hand about your great city. I truly valued the opportunity to speak with your Council directly about the partnership between the Sheriffs Office and the Edina Police Department. Thank you for your on -going commitment and support of public safety. In the future, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 612.348.2347 or rich.stanekCa hennepin.us. !k Hennepin County Sheriff c� Heather Branigin From: Lawrence Swandby <swanlaw0l @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, July 07, 201412:26 PM To: James Hovland; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinareality.com; swensonannl @gmail:com Cc: Chad Millner, Toby Muse Subject: Arden Park D Neighborhood 2015 Roadway Reconstruction Attachments: Letter to Millner, City Engineer.pdf Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Preliminary to any vote to be taken on any recommendations by the Engineering Department, I write to express my interest and concerns regarding the 2015 Road Construction in my Arden Park neighborhood. I enclose my letter of June 18, 2014 to Mr. Chad Millner Director of Engineering, for your easy reference. I believe that.sidewalks on Juanita and or Indianola are neither necessary nor useful to the implementation of the adopted Living Streets Policy. To include them in the Reconstruction design would be a total waste of the PACS Fund for the following reasons(more detail in letter to Millner): 1. The PACS Fund would be put to much better use for sidewalks in other high risk areas such as near schools and heavy traffic areas. ( E.g. The Halifax avenue sidewalk was necessary). I see•no reason to dissipate the Fund when its assets are better spent elsewhere. 2. Both Juanita and Indianola have a very light volume of traffic. Neither are "Connector Streets." 3. None of the residents I have talked to wish sidewalks on either Juanita or Indianola. And indeed, most like myself, are adamantly opposed to including them. 4. There are virtually no safety concerns regarding pedestrians or bikers on Juanita 'or Indianola. I feel completely safe when walking and so do my neighbors: 5. Sidewalks would change the character of this delightful,. extremely well maintained - iconic Edina neighborhood by subtracting_ from the landscaping of very small lot sizes (compared to many Edina lots) and generally engendering amore closed in rather than open space feeling. I hope that the Council will give every consideration to the opinions of the majority of the residents on Juanita and Indianola and consider the above points together with any other objections made by "your constituents on Juanita and Indianola when taking a final vote on the design of the Arden Park neighborhood regarding the inclusion of sidewalks on Juanita or Indianola Avenues' Good representative government includes exceptions to general policy for those most affected by specific proposals. I look forward to any replies you wish to write. Sincerely yours, Lawrence L. Swandby Attorney at Law 952- 926 -1078 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Millner, I write as a property owner in the Arden Park D Neighborhood. Enclosed is the Resident Questionnaire requested by June 20, 2014. It appears to me from the material recently sent that the Project Area planners assume that sidewalks are necessary not only on the Connector Streets but also on the Local Street Types. I believe that the use of the PACS Fund would be a waste of the Fund's money if sidewalks were included on Juanita, and Indianola Avenues as well as 51st Streets. Traffic is minimal and pedestrian safety is not an issue. Sidewalks would change the lovely character of this delightful 1940's neighborhood. I also note the lot sizes are much smaller than Arden, Minnehaha and Bruce causing inconvenience Additionally if Arden is a Connector Street, so also should Bruce be so designated since many autos cut through Bruce to reach 52nd street before the drivers even reach Arden. And if sidewalks are included on the above, is little Georgas, dead end or not, to be left alone between France and all the other streets? Now, I appreciate that the City following many US city trends has adopted the Living Streets Policy. However, no Policy should be implemented without room for exceptions. It is the "exception" concept rather than the "cookie cutter' plan of governance that makes Edina an exceptional place to live. Although residents are not assessed for sidewalks, they still end up paying for them by paying into the PACS. I therefore hope you will follow the desires of the majority of the residents on Juanita Avenue by not including sidewalks on Juanita Avenue in the 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Plan feasibility report at the public hearing in December. Regards, Lawrence L. Swandby Attorney at Law 5124 Juanita Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 952 - 926 71078 June 18, 2014 cc Mr. Toby Muse, SEH Project Manager Heather Branigin From: Morse- Wendt, Lauren <lmorsewendt @edc.org> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 4:34 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Letter in Support of 66 West Apartments Dear Edina City Council, As a staff, member of Edina Community Lutheran Church and liaison to our Housing Task Force, I write on behalf of many when.l encourage you to support the building of 66 West Apartments. Over the past three years, I have witnessed a 1. groundswell'of support from across Edina and.neighboring suburbs in support of this work. Our own congregation of 750 members is'fully behind the project with both our time and our finances.I We have made:presentations to thousands of people gathered faith communities, civic groups, neighborhood- associations, and condo buildings. The response .-has been overwhelmingly positive: people in Edina recognize the deep need to support young people on their own and believe Edina;is the right leader to provide the,.first housing for formerly homeless youth in the westemsuburbs. Edina has a wonderful reputation for being an attractive community that supports and nurtures youth and affirming 66 West Apartments is another excellent opportunity to live out that value. ECLC's Housing Task Force is thrilled with the property we have found in the. Southdale area. It is ideally located for access to the: jobs that each resident will be matched with shortly after moving in as well as perfectly situated for . transportation to those jobs and other educational opportunities. Having visited Nicollet Square,,amodel fo'r our own building, many times, I can attest to what a good neighbor 66 West will be. And, in addition to being a.good neighbor,'the 39 studio apartments at 66 West can help Edina meet the affordable housing goals it has struggled to meet in the past. Please support'the necessary zoning changes to allow 66 West Apartments to be built into an apartment building that will reflect the value of supporting our young people that we have always known Edina to have. Thank you for your service and your careful consideration of this project. Lauren Morse -Wendt Lauren Morse - Wendt, Diaconal Minister Mission and Ministry Developer Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113.W. 54'" Street, Edina, MN 55424 (952) 926 -3808 "Like" ECLC on Facebook at www.facebook.com /edinacomm Heather Branigin From: laurieb @tcq.net Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 5:16 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am writing to express my support the the proposed development of housing for homeless youth. I believe that the location will be convenient for youth needing transportation and will provide an ongoing labor source for the many businesses in the area. Thank you for your support. Heather Branigin From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail:com> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 9:58'.PM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Joni Bennett; ann Swenson; Cary Teague; Scott- Neal Subject: new development 72nd st Dear City Officials, Yet again we have heard of a developer meeting with the planning commission asking for several EXTREMELY ALARMING variances �.( from 4'to 6 stories :from 30 to 50 units per acre; and floor area ratio from .5 to 1.41 giving 57o Park*' spaces.to 195 residential units and commercial space!!!!!!) to construct a MONSTROUS high <density apartment development at the SW corner of France and 72nd street!!!! My gosh have you seen'the ".drawing? That development belongs NO WHERE NEAR residential homes! It is unconscionable for the city to allow this typeof proposal to advance as far as it has and cause such fear and anxiety among.the local homeowners!!! The neighborhood.feels itis at war with the developers and'that the city is catering to developers and giving them the impression that they can have what they ask for and that our zoning is just merely a suggestion, easily changed and not enforced. PLEASE ! ! ! ! Can we give homeowners some peace of mind that we are not at the mercy of developers? Can you please send out the message loud and clear to developers not to even THINK of giving a presentation that goes against our zoning rules? Why bother ever having zoning regulations if you are willing to view proposals that so blatantly go against them? Has anyone given any consideration to the. immediate neighborhood in relation to how our traffic will be negatively impacted by 570 or more vehicles cutting through on Cornelia Drive right past Cornelia Elementary School to get to 72nd Street? Local homeowners already` struggle to exit our neighborhood via 72nd street because of already heavy, traffic on France! We have limited exit and entrance routes to our neighborhood. as you should well know by now and it is dangerous to cause more congestion this way! Furthermore, any, additional apartment housing should be extremely well studied as to how it will affect'our public school enrollment! How much, if any, planning has the.city conducted with the Edina School District officials to determine the number of students our buildings SHOULD hold? Is anyone paying attention to how crowded our schools,are and realizing we cannot add on to the high school and therefore we need to start with that number, and then determine how many students our middle schools can feed into our limited high school space and from that number determine how we need to limit the number of elementary students we enroll and from that determine how many apartment units we can allow to be built because even if they are intended for older people now, you better look ahead many many years when those buildings will no longer be new and will be more attractive to families with children! It is such an insult to our homeowners to have to constantly live on high alert to discover these proposals and fight fight fight! We just want to be able to have a city that will protect homeowners so we don't constantly have to reevaluate if we need to move!' Several developers have tried to scare the city planners and council into accepting their proposals by threatening that they will walk away if they don't get what they want. Let them walk! The Sunrise development is one example where someone came in with a better proposal for the neighborhood and we should be patient and wait for people like that to move in. Come on! We need to be strong against developers. Patience. Let's not;waste our time entertaining developers whose proposals give homeowners ulcers! We will fight against what we strongly feel is bad for our neighborhood and it will only cause more division on top of what the Fred issue has already caused. I sure hope you all can see this is a poor idea at an even poorer time. If any one of you would not like to have your house next to a development like this, you should not put us in same position! Very frustrated, Marie Sullivan and many, many neighbors. f Heather <Braniain From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 07; 201410:17 PM Toc F Edina Mail Subject 72nd St. development Attachments: 72 st development.docx Dear Planning Commission Members, Please read my attached letter pertaining to the proposed development on the SW corner of 72nd and France. Thank you. Sincerely, SE Edina resident Marie Sullivan Dear City Officials, Yet again we have heard of a developer meeting with the planning commission asking for several EXTREMELY, ALARMING variances ( from 4 to 6 stories, from 3o to 50 units per acre, and floor area ratio from .5 to 1.41 giving 570 parking spaces t0;195 residential units and commercial space!!!!!!) to construct a MONSTROUS high density apartment development at the SW corner of France and 72nd street!!!! My gosh have you seen the drawing? That development belongs NO WHERE NEAR residential homes! It is unconscionable for the city to allow this type of proposal to advance as far as it has and cause such fear and anxiety among the local homeowners!!!, The neighborhood feels it is at war with the developers and that the city is catering to developers and giving them the impression that they can have what they ask for and that our zoning is just merely a suggestion, easily changed and not enforced. PLEASE!!!! Can we give homeowners some peace of mind that we are not at the mercy of developers? Can you please send out the message loud and clear to developers not to even THINK of giving a presentation that goes against our zoning rules? Why bother ever, having zoning regulations if you are willing to view proposals that so blatantly go against them? Has anyone given any consideration to the immediate neighborhood in relation to how our traffic will be negatively impacted by 570 or more vehicles cutting through on Cornelia Drive right past Cornelia Elementary School to get to 72nd Street? Local homeowners already struggle to exit our neighborhood via 72nd street because of already heavy traffic on France! We have limited exit and entrance routes to our neighborhood as you should well know by now and it is dangerous to cause more congestion this way! Furthermore, any additional apartment housing should be extremely well studied as to how it will affect our public school enrollment! How much, if any, planning has the city conducted with the Edina School District officials to determine the number of students our buildings SHOULD hold? Is anyone paying attention to how crowded our schools are and realizing we cannot add on to the high school and therefore we need to start with that number and then determine how many students our middle schools can feed into our limited high school space and from that number determine how we need to limit the number of elementary students we enroll and from that determine how many apartment units we can allow to be built because even if they are intended for older people now, you better look ahead many many years when those buildings will no longer be new and will be more attractive to families with children! It is such an insult to our homeowners to have to constantly live on high alert to discover these proposals and fight fight fight! We just want to be able to have a city that will protect homeowners so we don't constantly have to reevaluate if we need to move! Several developers have tried to scare the city planners and council into accepting their proposals by threatening that they will walk away if they don't get what they want. Let . them walk! The Sunrise development is.one example -where someone came in with a better proposal for the neighborhood and we should be patient and wait for people like that to move in. Come on! We need to be strong against developers. Patience. Let's not waste our time entertaining developers whose:proposals'give homeowners ulcers! We will fight against what we strongly feel is bad for our neighborhood and it will only cause more division on top` of what the Fred issue has already caused. I sure hope you all can see this is a poor idea at an even poorer time. If any one of you would not like to have your house next to a development like this, you should:not put us in same position! Very,frustrated, Marie Sullivan and many; many neighbors. Heather Branigin From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 07,2014 11:05 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Cary Teague; Scott Neal; Joni Bennett; ann swenson Subject: more on 72nd St. development Dear City Officials, Council Members and Planning Committee Members, I just have to add something more, about the 72nd and France development proposal. People who moved into the Cornelia neighborhood did so because they highly valued Edina schools, loved the Fred Richards Golf course, liked the relatively easy commute to downtown, and felt the area had a suburban feel to it. Now however, Cornelia Elementary has been "dumbed" down in the last ten years, the Fred is going away, airplane and traffic noise and congestion have greatly increased, and the city is pushing for tall, dense developments which add more congestion and are converting our suburb to an urban area. I hope you realize that if, on top of all the other things which are making the Cornelia area less desirable to home owners, you allow too much density to encroach too closely to Cornelia neighborhood:homes, people who tend to have enough disposable income to keep their homes in good repair:will choose elsewhere to live. Property values will go down and the neighborhood is very likely to head into disrepair. I hope you will take this very probable situation seriously because current residents are feeling this way. It is no fun to live in a neighborhood that feels it is going downhill. Marie Heather Branigin From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday; July 07, 201411:34 PM To: Edina Mail cc: Mary , Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Cary Teague; Scott Neal; Joni Bennett; ann swenson Subject: 72rid development I would also like to draw your attention to something on the artists drawing of the proposed development. They intentionally oriented both carson 72nd street to look as though they are traveling in the same direction to make it appear as though that road.has two lanes going one- direction., They clearly realized how overly large their development would look next to the smaller, two - directional normal city street that currently exists! 1 Heather Braniain From: Christine" art <chart@capsh.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 7:49 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartments Hello, My name is Christine Hart, and I am a Community Developer with Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin I have been working closely with the 66 West Apartments project for the past year because I have met too many youth experiencing homelessness in the West Metro who can benefit from 6 development such as this. It is outrageous that there are currently no supportive housing developments in suburban Hennepin County servicing homeless youth. We can continue providing.immediate services, but without a long -term solution, nothing will change. 66 West Apartments is the beacon of hope our community needs. I, along with many of your constituents, will; be following the July 23 and August Edina City Council hearings. I hope that as you continue to understand the extent of youth homelessness in our community, the city council will unanimously approve 66 West Apartments. With gratitude, Christine Christine Hart Community` Developer Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin 8800 Highway 7, #40i St. Louis Park,- -MN 55426 952- 697 -1.325 ext. 264 chart@capsh.org 1 Heather Branigin From: The Youngbloods <lpy -kwy @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:44 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West Attachments: Larry.vcf To Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council: My name is Katherine Youngblood. I live in Edina at 5275 Grandview Square. My husband and I have lived in Edina since 1975 and our three sons graduated from Edina West High School. We attend church in downtown Minneapolis (Westminster) and through this connection I became very interested in the big problem of homelessness and youth. Nicollet Square, at 37th and Nicollet Avenue, has proven to be remarkably successful in providing safety and stability for young people enabling them to get going on a useful, productive, life. Now Edina has the opportunity to set an example for other suburban communities by taking a lead on ending homelessness in the suburbs. I was delighted to learn that there is an ideal location for this effort in the Southdale area. It only makes sense to have transportation, jobs and services nearby. What has impressed me the most about Nicollet Square is how responsible and motivated the young people have become now that they feel stable and secure. Edina should be proud to have the opportunity to offer this same kind affordable housing in our community and, of course, 39 apartments does help the city to meet our affordable housing goals. It is extremely important that the leadership of our city realize this critical need, support the zoning changes necessary, and communicate that support to our citizens. Let's make 66 West a reality[ Sincerely, Katherine Youngblood Heather_Branigin From: Jackie Sullivan <sullivan6832 @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 201411:10 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cary Teague Subject: Support for 66 West Apartments - 3330 West 66th Street, Edina Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, and Planning Commission Members: I write to voice my support for 66 West Apartments, the affordable housing development for,,youth experiencing homelessness proposed by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, to be located at 3330 West 66th Street, Edina. In a recent article in the Edina Sun Current, Arnold Bigbee, co -chair of the Edina HRRC's Community Outreach Workgoup; is quoted as follows: "Edina is committed to providing a welcoming community where everyone can thrive. We want to hear about individual, legal, political, societal, and cultural. experiences. (We hope to) build a better`Edina that promotes and encourages positive change. The article notes community conversations' to identify areas where Edina.succeeds as a supportive community as well as areas in which the city could improve. I believe Edina succeeds in supporting many youth in our community — but, it does not adequately support all youth. Affordable, supportive housing for young people 18 -22 years old who have graduated from foster care or determined they need to leave a'dysfunctional and conflicted home environment is not currently available in Edina or nearby suburbs. Unfortunately, the ability to serve these youth antl help them thrive is too often overlooked, perhaps because Edina citizens do not recognize youth facing•these issues are part of the Edina community. In.fact, they,are. I ask you to approve the rezoning required for Beacon's development to move forward.. Edina's commitment to being a supportive community is widely recognized. Youth who will live at 66 West Apartments are our youth, an they deserve our support and an opportunity to thrive. The location across from Southdale provides public transportation`and�entry level employment, both of which,are essential to positive change in'the lives.of these' young: people: I am a`member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. My faith plays an important role in my commitment to this project. To me, addressing the needs of homeless young people is the "highest and best use" of.this property. If not here, where? What community has better resources than Edina to provide leadership in creating supportive housing for all of our youth? Thank you for your consideration, Jackie Sullivan 6832 Gleason Road Edina, MN 55439 Heather Branigin From: Robert Hobbins <hobbins.robert@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 201411:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Affordable Youth Housing Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members, As a 30 year resident of Edina at 4708 Upper Terrace, I am writing to urge you to support this important project with the variances and permits required to establish this facility for homeless youth. The need is great, the location is ideal, and Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative has a proven track record as a very responsible operator of such facilities. I recently visited the Nicollet Square facility operated by Beacon in Minneapolis. I was very impressed with the quality of the facility, the value of the support services provided to its residents (including rapid job placement), and the success rate they enjoy in getting their tenants back on their feet and progressing with the jobs and education needed to become a successful contributor to the community. I also had a chance encounter with a resident of that neighborhood who reported that there had been no problems experienced in the neighborhood with the Nicollet Square tenants and that the local community was quite supportive of the facility. I suspect that you will hear expressions of fear from those who live or work near the proposed site, based on the supposition that this housing facility will bring in "undesirable elements." The reality is that these homeless youth have been and will continue to be present in the area as it is, roaming from the Southdale Food Court to the YMCA to the Southdale Library to get out of the elements as best they can. It will be far better for them and for us to provide them access to safe and affordable shelter, to valuable support services to assist them with occupational and education needs, and to a managed environment than it would be to simply leave them to their own devices. Thank you for your attention and for your anticipated support. Robert L. Hobbins Heather Branigin From: Lonni Skrentner <lonni.skrentner @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014.11:56 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor and City Council, I'm writing to express my full support for the establishment of the 66.West Apartments which will serve as tiahsitionalr housing for Homeless teens. Many faith congregations are supporting this effort. Changing the zoning makes sense since there are other apartments and condos in the area, and it is a perfect area - with public transport and a fair number of entry level job positions in the Southdale`area -for this effort to succeed. Teens needing education will be able to access the Richfield and. Edina Public Schools, as well as on -line options. The Southdale Library is within walking distance. Thank you for considering this matter. Lonni Skrentner Retired Edina High School Teacher Former School Board Member r,, 1 Heather Branigin . From: Mary Albing <lccr @me.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08,2014 12:39 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West, . Friends, I am a local pastor interested in affordable housing for all, ages, but especially for our homelessyouuth in this community. I lead a congregation on Penn Ave, just_;a•few blocks from Edina -and a significant number of our members live and work inAhe southwest metro and suburbs. Our family has had the experience of temporarily'housing a young man _(not a relative) who is finishing college. He has lived with us for eight months. He would have been homeless, even though he had been working 60 hours a week. He could not afford to repay.his student loans, work, stay in school and also pay his living expenses, including more than $700 per month for housing, so he opted -to "couch surf." He doesn't own a car. He doesn't waste money. He was staying at friends' houses as long as they or their parents would tolerate, him and then he'd move on. His parents live in the Fargo- Moorhead area, but cannot help financially, and no other family lives-in the Twin Cities, where he is only three classes shy of an applied economics degree at the University of MN. He was so desperate to finish his degree that he was willing to be homeless. He is a motivated guy just trying to make ends meet, get a decent job and get on with life. Unfortunately, his homelessness is not unique. One of our members helps veterans at MCTC. Last winter, 14% of their students were homeless. One of our members is a guidance counselor at Southwest High School. They estimate that more than 10% of their students are effectively homeless at any given time, including "couch surfers," because their home situations are intolerable or even dangerous. When a young adult is trying to find a place to rest his 'or her head, it's hard to manage other parts of life. For me and my family this is not a political issue. It is a moral issue. My faith says that my response to my neighbor,' especially one in need, 'is, my response to God. Fortunately, Beacon has a track record of developing projects that not only house homeless kids but help them become independent citizens. You can visit those other sites, as many of our member have, if you have questions about what the development might do to the neighborhood. You are in.the unique position of being able to help put dozens of young people on a better and safer path at an ideal location, near jobs, transportation and services. Please support 66 West. Faithfully, Rev. Mary Albing Lutheran Church of Christ the Redeemer 5440 Penn Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55419 PastorCcD_lccronpenn'.org :_, Heather Branigin From: Sunny Carlson <carlsonsunny19 @gmail.com> Sent~ Tuesday, July 08, 201412:40 PM: To: Edina Mail Cc: ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org Subje&. New Housing for formerly. Homeless in Edina I wanted to voice my support for the proposed solution to youth homelessness in the suburbs that is being proposed by 66 West Apartments. Having worked with homeless folks in the past, I know how critical it is to have affordable housing. Living right in Edina (at Yorktown Continental), I know that it is valuable to have affordable housing for seniors ... and it should be valuable to have affordable housing for everyone. Diversity makes a community rich in so many ways. I am active at Yorktown, leading the weekly Bible Study group, volunteering at Resident Association events and working to make our community "home ". I never go to bed at night without remembering the fondest wish of the homeless people that I worked with .... that they would have a pillow of their own.These are basic building blocks to a fruitful future that we should all be working towards. 66 West Apartments is a good thing for everyone in Edina to get behind and wholeheartedly support and many other residents here at Yorktown do so as well. Sincerely, Sonya (Sunny) Carlson Lenzo phone 952- 564 -7851 7151 York Ave. So. Apt 508 Edina, MN 55435 http : / /www.yorktownactivities.com Heather Branigin From: Ed Zantek• <fasteddiezl @hotrnail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July,08,' 20141:31 PM' To Edina Mail' Subject: Bedesen Park D road project, Mayor and council members, I am writing to complain about the lack of work. being performed on our street project. Toady is July 8, a. beautiful day, nothing being done., Ditto yesterday. ,Many fine days, and even weeks have passed with little progress..I understand that unexpected problems were discovered, but that is more reason to be working on these days when it is possible. Many of my neighbors are as upset as I am by the lack of progress. Best regards, Ed Zantek 5916 Tamarac Ave. Heather Branigin From: malostad@aol.com. Sent: Tuesday, July,08, 2014 "2:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: safe housing for homeless youth Greetings! My name is Catherine Malotky and I am a member of Edina Community Lutheran Church in Edina. I am supporting 66 West. Why? When I began my professional career, I was a high school teacher. I remember clearly a student of mine who lost both of her parents during her junior year. What was she going to do? Having a place where she could live safely and in a supportive environment meant everything to her. Thankfully, she was able to find an apartment, and she had a supportive extended family. I know not all kids have family assets like that to count on. 66 West is one way to fill in that gap, important in the short- term, but equally important in the longer term, so kids challenged by homelessness can land and learn and grow into contributing adults. Please support 66 West. It's too important. Sincerely, The Rev. Catherine Malotky 1 Heather Braniain From: Andrea.R.Scott @wellsfargo.com Sent:. Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Hello, I'm one of the homeowners affected by the sewer back -up on June 19, 2014. Is the City Council taking action to correct the problem that caused the back -up? Thank you. Andrea ,P- Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.7o8.6536 1 Heather Branigin From: Stephen Yanda <yandasr @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:16 PM To: Edina Mail; Bob Hobbins, Maura Schnorbach Subject: 66 West Mr Mayor and Council Members, I have attached a letter from Bob Hobbins that you should have already seen ! I went with Bob and another Edina resident, Maura Schnorbach, to Nicollet Square and I want to assure you that his note is accurate and summarizes my feelings as well. I wopuld simply add that in my judgement it is time for a project like 66 West in Edina ! ! ! ! I am sure all of you will support 66 West ! Thank you ! Steve Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members, As a 30 year resident of Edina at 4708 Upper Terrace, I am writing to urge you to support this important project with the variances and'permits required to establish this facility for homeless youth. The need is great, the location is ideal, and Beacon Interfaith Housing.Collaborative has a proven track record as a very responsible operator of such facilities. I recently visited the Nicollet Square facility operated by Beacon in Minneapolis. I was very impressed with the quality of the facility, the value of the support services provided to its residents (including rapid job placement), and the success rate they enjoy in gett ng their tenants back on their feet and progressing with the jobs and education needed to become a. successful contributor to the community. I also had a chance encounter with a resident of that neighborhood who reported that there had been no problems experienced in the neighborhood with the Nicollet Square tenants and that the local community was quite supportive of the facility. I suspect,that you will hear expressions of fear from those who live or work near the proposed site, based on the supposition that this housing facilitywill bring in "undesirable elements." The reality is that these homeless youth have been and will continue to be present in th6 b' rea as. it is',- roaming from the Southdale Food Court to the YMCA to the Southdale Library to get out of the elements as best they can. It will be far better for them and for us to provide them access to safe and affordable shelter, to valuable support services to assist;them with occupational and education needs, and to a managed environment than it would be to simply leave them to their own devices. Thank you for your attention and for your anticipated support. Robert L. Hobbins Steve Yanda - Edina resident since 1955 6008 Leslee Lane yandasr@grnail.com cell 651- 216 -0652 r Heather Braniain From: Andrea.R.Scott@wellsfargo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:58 PM To: jhovland @krausehovland.com Cc: Brian Olson; Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: RE: Edina City Council Thank you,. James. It's not so much an inquiry as it is a. request for funding from the Edina City Council to correct the problem. As you can imagine, this type of situation negatively impacts property value. Furthermore, I'm hesitant to repair my basement without assurance that the City is taking appropriate steps to correot.the problem. Bottom line: I'd like my request to remain with the City Council and not be passed off to the City Manager and the City Public Works Director. Thank you. Andrea Scott ,. 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN, 55436 612.708.6536 From: James Hovland rmailto :jhovland @krausehovland.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 20143:44 PM Tot Scott, Andrea R. cc: grian'Olson; Scott Neal Subject: FW:'Edina City Council a Andrea, thanks for the email. .I am.including the City Manager and the City Public Works Director on this email as I think they will be better able to answer your inquiry. Sorry to hear you had that problem. A lot of work to do as a result of that type of backup into your home. James B. Hovland, Esquire KRAUSE & HOVLAND, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 ihovland@krausehovland.com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 From: Lynette Biunno rmailto:lbiunno*EdinaMN.govl On Behalf Of Edina Mail - Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2614 3:37 PM Subject: FW: Edina City Council Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 828 -0389 IbiunnoOEdinaMN"aov I www.EdinaMN.nov ;f ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &" Doing Business 1 From: Andrea. R.Scott@)wellsfaroo.com f mailto: Andrea .R.Scott(a)wellsfargo.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:10 PM To: Edina Mail I - Subject: Edina City Council Hello, I'm one of the homeowners affected by the sewer back -up on June 19, 2014. Is the City Council taking action to correct the problem that caused the back -up? Thank you. Andrea R. Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.768.6536 Heather Branigin From: Maura Schnorbach <mschnorbach @stpatrick - edina.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 4:29 PM To: Stephen Yanda; Edina Mail; Bob Robbins Cc: Imorsewendt @ecic.org; Allison Johnson Subject: RE: 66 West Steve, Thank you for weighing in on this important decision! Steve Yanda and Bob Hobbins are not only residents of Edina, but both men are leaders on the St. Patrick's Social Justice Commission. Both men are also very successful businessmen and are widely respected not only in Edina, but in the broader Twin Cities community. I am fortunate that I have had an opportunity to work with both of them. I highly value their opinions and frequently seek out their thoughts on issues related to Social Justice at St. Patrick's Church. We are very careful about agencies that we align ourselves with for projects. We review track records, reputations, etc. In the Office of Social Justice, we are passionate advocates of affordable housing, but realize that it is not only critical to have passion, but the ability to deliver services. Beacon Interfaith Ministries is not only capable, but has a proven track record with over 500 units of affordable housing in the Twin Citiesl Steve, Bob and I attended presentations regarding this project and felt it was worthy of support from our Social Justice Commission, but also our church too! We also reviewed 66 West with the Social Justice Office of Catholic Charities, a champion of Social Justice and a thought leader on poverty in the Twin Cities! They also endorsed this project! Our Pastor, Fr. Tim Rudolph! and our Social Justice Commission were in unanimous agreement that the time was, "now" to move forward on endorsing this project. Unfortunately, poverty is on the rise. We are no strangers to it in the suburbs. VEAP, one of our partner ministries has said that requests have increased significantly during the last year. St. Patrick's collected almost 3,000 pounds of groceries for VEAP during 2013 -2014. All of the groceries are being distributed to neighbors in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Throughout the year I also receive desperate calls from people who are in danger of being evicted. Some are members of our parish, some are not. I responded to one last week. Holiday weeks are always tough! The call was from a young mother who had three children under the age of five including a newborn. We had less than 24 hours to come up with the funds to cover her rent, because the sheriff was scheduled to evict her the following day at noon. Pleading with me to keep her family off the street, we quickly moved into action. By a miracle we had the funds, a person to prepare the check and one of our signers. These calls keep me awake at night! I realize how precarious the line is for so many people that reach out to us in desperation. Last week, I said to our Pastor, Fr. Tim Rudolphi that our team did amazing work. We bought this family some time to regroup. Unexpected bed rest for several weeks required the mother to miss work. She had no safety net. Beacon Interfaith Ministries is trying to build a safety net for young adults between the ages of 18 -22. This is the time of life that many young people are going away to college and dreaming of a big future! Investing in young adults who are motivated, but need a chance is what this project is all about. Young adults need a safe place to plan their futures, to secure a job and to receive long over -due support! This is a game changer! We are confident that you will join us, Beacon Interfaith Ministries, Edina Community Lutheran Church and all of the other congregations in saying, "yes" to our young people who need us to believe in their dreams too! Building a home, builds a life! I am grateful that you are undertaking careful consideration of this project. I know that you will become supporters of the project like Bob Hobbins, Steve Yanda and all of the supporters of 66 West! Best, Maura Schnorbach Social Justice Coordinator Saint Patrick's Catholic Church (952)941 -3164, ext.142 mschnorbach @stpatrick- edina.org From: Stephen Yanda [mailto:yandasr @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:16 PM To mail @edinamn.gov; Bob Hobbins; Maura Schnorbach Subject: 66 West Mr Mayor and Council Members, I have attached a letter from Bob Hobbins that you should have already seen ! I went with Bob and another Edina resident, Maura Schnorbach, to Nicollet Square and I want to assure you that his note is accurate and summarizes my feelings as well. I wopuld simply add that in my judgement it is time -for a project like 66 Westin Edina ! ! ! ! lam sure all of you will support 66 West ! Thank you ! Steve Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members, As a 30 year resident of Edina at 4708 Upper Terrace, I am writing to urge you to support this important project with the variances and permits required to establish this facility for homeless youth. The need is great, the location is ideal, and Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative has a proven track record as a very responsible operator of such facilities. I recently visited the Nicollet Square facility operated by Beacon in Minneapolis.. I was very impressed with the quality of the facility, the value of the support services provided to its residents (including rapid job placement), and the success rate they enjoy in getting their tenants back on their feet and progressing with the jobs and education needed to become a successful contributor to the community. I also had a chance encounter with a resident of that neighborhood who reported that there had been no problems experienced in the neighborhood with the Nicollet Square tenants and that the local community was quite supportive of the facility. I suspect that you will hear expressions of fear from.those who live or work near the proposed site, based on the supposition that this housing facility will bring in "undesirable elements." The reality is that these homeless youth have been and will continue to be present in the area as;it is, roaming from the Southdale Food Court to the YMCA to the Southdale Library to get out of the elements as best they can. It will be far better for them and for us to provide them access to safe and affordable shelter, to valuable support services to assist them with occupational and education needs, and to a managed environment than it would be to simply leave them to their own devices. Thank you for your attention and for your anticipated support. Robert L. Hobbins Steve Yanda - Edina resident since 1955 6008 Leslee Lane Xandasr@gmail.com cell 651 -2'16 -0652. 3 Heather Branigin From: Jessica Cook <cooksfour@c`omcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 7:09 PM To: Edina Mail. Subject: Supportive: Youth Housing Hello, I am writing to let you know I support the proposed housing for homeless youth'on 66th Street. I have toured Beacon Interfaith's youth housing development on Nicollet in Minneapolis and' it was safe, secure, attractive, and quality housing for a vulnerable and important population. I personally know two homelessyoung men, scholars and athletes in our community, who for personal reasons have been unable to live with parents or guardians. Friends' parents took them in, but if there had not been a place for them to go they could have been at risk. It's not very visible in our community, but homelessness among youth is happening. I support community efforts to provide safe and supportive housing to our young people. Thank you for your consideration. Jessica Cook 5408 Glengarry Parkway Edina, MN 55436 1 Heather Branigin From: James Hovland <jhovland @krausehovland.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:32 PM To: Andrea.R.Scott@welIsfargo.com Cc: Brian Olson; Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: RE: Edina City Council Andrea, this is potentially an insurance coverage issue for the City but only if there is proven negligence on the part of the City. It might also be covered by your homeowner's insurance if you have sewer backup coverage. I do not know the factual circumstances of your case but the matter will not be handled by the Council but by the City's insurer, if you decide to make a claim. I think either Mr. Olson or Mr. Neal can direct you on how to file a claim if you decide to do so. The City's insurance carrier will then investigate to determine if the City was negligent in maintaining its system and if so, whether its negligence caused your sewer backup problem. Feel free to stay in touch on this issue if you so desire. James B. Hovland, Esquire KRAUSE & HOVLAND, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 ihovlandPkrausehoviand.com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 From: Andrea.R.Scott0)wellsfargo.com [ mailto :Andrea.R.Scott(&wellsfargo.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:58 PM To: James Hovland Cc: bolson @EdinaMN.gov; sneal (dedinamn.gov; mail@)EdinaMN.gov Subject: RE: Edina City Council Thank you, James. It's not so much an inquiry as it is a request for funding from the Edina City Council to correct the problem. As you can imagine, this type of situation negatively impacts property value. Furthermore, I'm hesitant to repair my basement without assurance that the City is taking appropriate steps to correct the problem. Bottom line: I'd like my requestto remain with the City Council and not be passed off to the City Manager and the City Public Works Director. Thank you. Andrea Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.708.6536 From: James Hovland f mailto :jhoviand(&krausehovland.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:44 PM To: Scott, Andrea R. Cc: Brian Olson; Scott Neal Subject: FW: Edina City Council Andrea, thanks for the email. I am including the City Manager and the City Public Works Director on this email as I think they will be better able to answer your inquiry. Sorry to hear you had that problem. A lot of work to do as a result of that type of backup into your home. James B. Hovland, Esquire KRAUSE & HOVLAND, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue. Minneapolis, MN 55403 ihoviand@krausehovland.com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 From: Lynette Biunno [mAft:lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:37 PM Subject: FAN: Edina City Council v ` "Fc Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-92748611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(&EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov s ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Andrea. R.Scott(alwellsfargo.com [mailto: Andrea. R.Scott(alwellsfargo.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Hello, I'm one of the homeowners affected by the sewer back -up on June 19, 2014. Is the City Council taking action_ to correct the problem that caused the back -up? Thank you. Andrea R. Scott 6604 Londonderry. Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.708.6536 Heather. Branigin From: Tom Miller <tom @temillerdevelopment.com> Sent: Wednesday, July'09, 2014 7:34 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org; Sarah Mollet (SMollet @beaconinterfaith.org); dbonlender @beaconinterfaith.org; Bernie Beaver (Bbeaver44 @gmail.com) Subject: 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor Hovland & City Council Members, I live in Edina at 5000 France Ave S., # 36 , also, I own and develop Real Estate, primarily apartments. Recently I have become award of the 39 unit apartment development at 3330 W 66th Street in Edina for youth by Interfaith . I am in favor of this development and feel it is needed in the Edina area, the use is appropriate for the location, near a bus line and jobs for consumers. Please approve the request from the Interfaith organization . Thank You Tom Miller 1 Heather Branigin From: Andrea.R.Scott@wellsfargo.com Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:59 AM To: jhovland @krausehovland.com Cc: Brian Olson; Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: RE: Edina City Council James, I think there may have been a miscommunication. I understand my insurance options and have handled my claim with my insurance provider already. My concern is that Edina's sanitary sewer system cannot handle a large influx of water without it backing up into homes. I believe the city had the same problem in 1985 and 1987 as well. I'm looking for action from the city to prevent the problem from occurring in the future. It is my understanding that funding to correct the sanitary sewer problem is something that the City Council has control over. Let me know if I've misunderstood the process. Thank you. Andrea Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.708.6536 From: James Hovland rmailto :jhovland @krausehovland.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:32 PM To: Scott, Andrea R. . Cc: bolson @EdinaMN.gov; sneal @edinamn.gov; mail @Edi6aMN.gov Subject, RE: Edina City Council Andrea, this is potentially an insurance coverage issue for the City but only if there is proven negligence on the part of the City. It might also be covered by your homeowner's insurance if you have sewer backup coverage. I do not know the factual circumstances of your case but the matter will not be handled by the Council'but by the City's insurer, if you decide to make a claim. I think either Mr. Olson or Mr. Neal can direct you on how to file a claim if you decide to do so. The City's insurance carrier will then investigate to determine if the City was negligent in maintaining its system and if so, whether its negligence caused your sewer backup problem. Feel free to stay in touch on this issue if you so desire. James B. Hovland, Esquire KRAUSE & HOVLAND, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 jhovland @krausehovland.com Phone: (612) 874-8550 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 From: Andrea.R. Scott@wellsfargo.com r mailto :Andrea.R.Scott@wellsfargo.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:58 PM 1 To: James Hovland Cc: bolson(aEdinaMN.gov; sneaWedinamn.gov; mail @EdinaMN.gov Subject: RE: Edina City Council Thank you, James. It's not so much an inquiry as it is a request for funding from the Edina City Council to correct the problem. As you can imagine, this type of situation negatively impa66; zvperty value. Furthermoke, I'm hesitant to repair my basement without assurance that the City is taking appropriate steps to correct the problem. gottom line:. I'd like my request to remain with the. City Council and not be passed off to the City Manager and the City Public Works Director. Thank you. Andrea Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.708.6536 From: James Hovland f mailto :jhovland @krausehovland.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:4410M To:.Soott, Andrea R. Cc: Brian Olson; Scott Neal Subject: FW: Edina City Council Andrea, thanks for the email. I am including the City Manager and the City Public Works Director on this email as I think they will be better able to answer your inquiry. Sorry to hear you had that problem. A lot of work to do as a result of that type of backup into your home. James B. Hovland, Esquire KRAUSE & HOVLAND, Chartered 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403"- - ihovland @krausehovland . com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 From: Lynette Biunno f mailto:lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov] On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent:. Tuesday, July 08;,2014 3:37 PM Subject: FW: Edina City Council Lynette Biunno, Receptionist o a 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ib16nno9 dinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN:6ov` ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Fr6m: Andrea.R.Scott(dwellsfargo.com fmailto :Andrea.R.Scott @wellsfargo.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Hello, I'm one of the homeowners affected by the sewer back -up on June, 19, 2014. Is the City Council taking action to correct the problem that caused the back -up? 2 Thank you. Andrea R Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612.708.6586 3 Heather Branigin From: sharon hall <halls329 @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:33 AM To: Edina Mail' Subject: Support of 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, I am a long time member of Richfield United Methodist Church and strong supporter of affordable housing for ALL and particularly the opportunity to provide housing for young adults in the southwest suburbs. Although I do not live in Edina,"my church has members who do and'tI hey report having seen first hand young adults struggle with homelessness. As a member of the Social Justice and Outreach committee at my church I have had an opportunity to visit Nicollet Square; in Minneapolis . and now l am even more excited by the possibilities for similar housing in Edina. Southdale' is the ideal location for this kind of housing as it is close to jobs, transportation and services. This project will help Edina in its efforts to meet city affordable housing goals with 39 affordable apartments for young people. . The city of Edina and its leadership should support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. Housing for young adults in Edina will benefit all of the southwest metro suburbs and meet an important need. It's the right thing to do and should be important to all of us. Sharon Hall 401 E. Burnsville Pkwy Burnsville, Mn. 55337 Heather: Braniain From: M.J. Bauer <mjbauer8495 @aol.com> Sent Wednesday, July 09, 201411:32 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: Beacon Housing Project for Homeless Young Adults I was so grateful to recently hear about the proposed site in Edina for homeless youth. I am a 30+ year Edina resident who has benefitted from all the privileges that come with being a white, upper middle class, well educated and financially secure individual. I am also very involved in work for the poor and disenfranchised. In my volunteer work I see young adults that are separated from their families or age out of foster care and lack the support system and resources to make it on their own. I am proud that the City of Edina is looking at being part of the solution. M.J. Bauer 7609 Gleason Road Edina MN 55439 1 • a g� i Heather Branigin From: Patty Schulz <PattyS @veap.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 09,2014 1*40 PM To: Edinailvlail Cc: Pamela Page Subject VEAP golf benefit Importance: High Hi Mayor Hovland, I left.a message for you yesterday but thought I would follow.up with an email. We have a couple of spots in our golf tournament and wondering if you would be interested in joining us as our guest? As l said, we have a couple of spots so if you wanted to bring a friend you are welcome to do so. Here are the details: Monday, July 14 @,Minnesota Valley Country Club Check in, lunch buffet, driving range, putting green, silent auction open at 11:00 a.m. Shotgun start at 12:30 p.m. Social hour.and silent auction at 5:30 p.m. with dinner to follow. Please let me know if you are able to join us —we certainly hope so! Patty Patty Schulz Advancement Directo1_1 Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People 19600 Aldrich Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 1 (ph) 952.955.8310 1 (f) 952.881.8322 VEAP has moved! We are now located at 9600 Aldrich Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55420. Please update your records. 1 Name: . �. �� � Address: 10 � ��• Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless, in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: 1' + J UPS/ �� 1 / 9rlps r F f Address: MA) 166-77L{3 Congregation: 1 qg r2qq aF fltf JI u,3 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincere 13 Edina City Council, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 pustege required S.as postage required Name: t6kg-7(lL.Pqd Address: / � �21p c d ����� Con ation:,g� Dear Edina City Council:member, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated.that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in- the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is afford.able';and supportive housing which will serve approximately39.youth,and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, �v Name: 1z t� �1 ��-1 Opp =.as postage rr' required Address: J � � �2 %� e s a'-1' v e- M1n n ecCP0 (A S nn fi -5-5-}/ o Congregation: H� Dear Edina ity Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, _ Name: 4 t GuryI v eL5orl Address: l ;7 W Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300'youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, ` ✓� fj _ Name: l Address: Congregation: � �L—Q- ft z� C S Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage ►equ§ed 5.49 postage required Name: Address:. , p, f, s, A/ V Congregation: sh;e l'h e dh // �l S Dear Edina City.Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end:homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing. which will serve approximately 39 youth and young'adults. Edina City. Council 4801 West.50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: !' Addres ,y s: %� , Congregation:C �� 1. Jhe. Dear Edina City Councihnember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 5.49 postage required Name: T A UL jj 6 H S�C lc., S.as postage Address: �d Aijlp VeU27, M'I Congregation: S o f D ,� , N i l� S a Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: // required Address: Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Name: - X 0-f +)1 Address: Congregati U"�'� Dear Edina City Councilinember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any.given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: �Q Address: la 1 d - c n � N+. et✓ Congregation: '5 �''J S Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help_ suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina., MN 55424 °.49 postage required $.49 Po�9e required Name: Address: Congregation: j Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable I housing and end homelessness. Ifle OX/ On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, A)J� ff KAgq� Name: Address: 1 S 1013 Congregation: 0�- � Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, / Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 8.49 postage regrrired 8.49 postage . required Name: Address: •�` - �'' Congregation: 0 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. OJ\ v.0 \Q On any given night,, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: S Address: � (AM4 a �l�MA , M Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing'-and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincereiyl�l � Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 6.49 postage required Name: Jo—� kc I Address: Congregation: C LILJi Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve. approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please, help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,. Name: fle E� Address: L CJ i . Cyi cs Congregation: AA A CORA) Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,, y� a Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 C �X[ Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage s.49 postage �eq�tred Name: jqd Address: 4 Q 1 7 L� s,E- �ILO�., cA o M i a.1 GTi2, AJ Congregation: Dear Edina City. Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, 4-, ty Name: `�D� CI- SLksa'1 use Address: �q °area Z8� I Yvlar�oN' � �o�ev�ll,�., M6� 55 113 Congregation: Edi V1Gl cOVYIYYttA,Y1 1 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, P Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Name:�� Address: Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely,`. , t '! Name; L.Gr�� Address: Congregation: '<!�5 4W . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West .50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 B.as POSidgO IBQUtr9d 9.49 POSiBgB f000R6d Name: tJ Address: � U Congregation: Dear Edina City. Councilmember, The city` of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300, youth;are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing Which will serve, approximately 39 youth and young adults.. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: % (.i %1 J h G VV Address: d 74 L&K `)i-' lk 3l !� Congregation: Cl- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 _youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is, affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street ,Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 °.49 Postage required postage required Name: Address: G 144 ✓t D A Vr S 2GL f �i c 7 a- W Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 . and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: Address: Congregation: CO/A0. ed #R6(AI f X Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban pufli experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessn y p this roject. Sincerely' ipg- A 6407- /fODIVOW � ,0'51/9 h/ /�1LICn Ofils% 1 ) I / / /Jl�I�IiC s.as postage requ'ved 5.49 postage required Name: Morq� Address: '31 Lf'I I ng �e�vva� Congregation: .Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are' homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please 'help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: Address: 200 7 Congregation: ZAA Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, � C �G /�`_/ Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 [•.49 -P �Be q a.as postage Name: Roy, Address: 01 T�►c,J d 4 , MN sus -Z3 Congregation: Cgyyr' kmyl Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 And 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: le Address: Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Congregation: l Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults.. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage required s.49 Postage required Name: A a- l D!�qld Address: 4 rv�rk.oi.. � Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name:�„� Address: q" Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name:v 1 Address: I/ do rr f Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, `f—. I-loll JA-1 Address: �o' /V Oda PA) ST4% Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The "city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County: 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please'help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Since ° Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 t1iM i M !R53 S.as postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 �ri�' lllrrr�rr�tr »���r��}iir}rllrr��rlrl�; ,thtrltrr�u+rrli.rii June 29, 2014 Mayor James Hovland City Mgr. Scott Neal We have lived in our present'home for 51 years and I have lived within 2.blocks of here for almost 80 years. Even during the rains of 1987,1 have not had standing water in the back yard like I have now. With the construction of new garages on the back of their lots, they trap the water in our yard. The home just to the north of me has 80% of their drainage toward me. Their home, cement driveway, and garage all drain my way. All of the lots behind me drain my way where it is now trapped. Several homes to the south have sump pumps and drainage that drain to the rear of the lots and then drain toward me, The new home at 5841 St. Johns sump drains toward me. realize that this year we have had a lot of rain , but this problem has been bad for the last few years, and getting worse. I wouldlike the City of Edina to check on our problem and come up with a solution. Pictures: Last year flooding This year flooding New garages to our north Frank Wellman 952 - 922 -0170 5828 Fairfax Av. S ��: , , e`i- 4M1 _ � - v+r7q ''f . � ' `�' - � y —� � - _ . - L. a. - - _ * : _ -- ,`. ' � - �.. i _ � �� yip �rt� ;° -.n.y- ,t,. i .. s � -o C -_ l� rt. 1 �, 'y. 1 i •.Y -' 1: � � . �� �:� �- d ' .. _' �' h " � � � r- - - (�+� , a ' ' �- ^_ � _ � P '� ' a, �1 &,�.�: it _ �•'r! _ —'�` �, � `� � , r _ _ _, � � ti + ,,,_ d \ '.L � � � ; ' `, HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN m July 9, 2014 Dear Friend of HRC: On behalf of the Twin Cities Human Rights Campaign (HRC), we invite you to become a member of the Honorary Committee for the 25th Annual Twin Cities HRC Dinner on Saturday, September 6s', at the Minneapolis Convention Center. We are anticipating 1,000+ HRC members and supporters to join us to make this year's theme — "Evolve — Help Make History!" — both a celebration of our victories across the country this past year, as well as a call to action as we continue our work for full equality on many fronts, both locally and across the globe. We have much to celebrate! We are proud that 11 states have legalized marriage equality since the start of 2013. Currently, 44 percent of the U.S. population lives in states with marriage equality. We have seen legal and legislative victories across the country, with Houston passing an LGBT - inclusive equal rights ordinance and marriage equality lawsuits seeing consistent victories at all levels of the judicial system. Closer to home, Minneapolis scored a perfect 100 and St. Paul scored a 96 on HRC's Municipal Equality Index — a measurement of how many cities can, and do, support the LGBT people who live and work there, even where states and the federal government have failed to do so. There is still work to be done to ensure all people are treated with dignity, both at home and abroad. HRC continues to work to pass the Employment Non - Discrimination Act (ENDA), to protect students from bullying and harassment, to ensure equal access to healthcare, and to strive for inclusive immigration reform. HRC also advocates for LGBT rights and protections internationally, as recent events in Russia and Uganda have clearly demonstrated the need for work and service abroad. Joining the Honorary Committee lends your name to the list of high - profile HRC supporters who work to ensure their communities value the equal treatment of LGBT people everywhere. Becoming an Honorary Committee member is simple. We ask only that you purchase a dinner ticket (www.twincitiesdinner.org) and lend us the use of your name for the evening to promote LGBT equality. We also invite you to attend the VIP Reception at no extra cost, and mingle with fellow Honorary Committee members, corporate sponsors, and other HRC supporters. The VIP reception is from 5:00 to 6:00 pm with dinner following at 7:30 pm. To confirm your acceptance, sponsor a table, purchase additional tickets, or for any other questions, please contact Joshua Crosson at (202) 957 -2677 or joshuacrossont7a gmail.com. Please ensure your tickets are purchased by our program deadline of August 4, 2014. Thank you for your support of HRC! Sincerely, Tal Anderson and Alicia Schwarz 2014 HRC Twin Cities Dinner Co- chairs The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest non - profit advocacy organization working to ensure basic equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender citizens. With more than 700,000 members from all walks of life, HRC's mission is, in part: "... to ensure that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans can be open, honest and safe at home, at work, and in the community. " PO Box 377.1 \linneapolis, NIN 554031 webwww.twincifie- .d IRC.org Heather Branigin From: Ann Swenson <swensonann1 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 2:11 PM To: Edina Mail' Cc: Scott Neal Subject: Re: Edina City Council Andrea, we continue to work with the sewer capacity system that we share with many of our other cities located within the Met Council, district. The rain and flooding we just experienced caused back ups in all our surrounding communities too. We have worked hard the last ten years eliminating rain water from getting in'the sewer pipes. I.e. Sump pumps in private homes discharging into floor drains etc. This helps us keep more capacity for sewer water. A rain fall over the 100 year flood amount unfortunately overwhelmed our capacity. You can apply for an insurance claim from our city insurance. Traditionally this has not been covered. We switched companies July 1. The new policy sometimes will cover these claims. If you read our quarterly magazine this spring we encouraged all residents to add a sewer back up rider to their home policies. I know all this is not the answer you want. Ann Swenson council Sent from my iPad On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Edina Mail <mailna EdinaMN. ov> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist eOO l . 1 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 <nll g IbiunnoAZ-bEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Andrea.R.Scott@wellsfargo.com [ mailto :Andrea.R.Scott@wellsfargo.coml Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Hello, I'm one of the homeowners affected by the sewer back-up on June 19, 2014. Is the City Council taking action to correct the problem that caused the back -up? Thank you. Andrea R. Scott 6604 Londonderry Drive Edina, MN 55436 612. 708.6536 Heather Braniain From: Ann Swenson <swensonann1 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday_, July 09,-2014 2:12 PM To3 Edina Mail Subjects Re: Bedesen Park D road project, - Ed, I have. asked Scott Neal to look. into the slowness of this project. Ann Swenson Sent from my iPad ; On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Edina Mail <mail(a EdinaMN. og_v> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist e001. 1 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax'952- 826 -0389 <una g g Ibiunno EdInaMN.00v I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ed Zantek fmailto:fasteddiezl @ hotmall.com1 Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 1:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Bedesen Park D road project, Mayor and council members, am" writing to complain about the lack of work being performed on our street project. Toady,is July 8, a beautiful day, nothing being done. Ditto yesterday. Many fine days, and even weeks have passed with little progress. I understand that unexpected problems were discovered, but that is more reason to be working on these days when it is possible. Many of my neighbors are as upset as I am by the lack of progress. Best regards, Ed Zantek 5916 Tamarac Ave. i Heather Branigin From: Mary Rogers <minnesotamaryann @gmail.com> - Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 5:28 PM'- To: Edina Mail Subject: Homeless youth From: Mary Rogers, retired psychologist and college teacher Address: 4360 Brookside Ct., # 317, Edina, MN 55436 (formerly a Morningside resident for 40 years). Email: mmnesotamaryann@wnail.com Phone: 952- 927 =8168 Church Affiliation: Edina- Morningside Community Church I am writing in support of the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative's proposal to establish housing for young adults who are without a home at 3330 West 66th St. I have know friends of my children who were in difficult or desperate family situations where they needed or were kicked out of their home and did not have the maturity or skills to figure out how to make it on their own. I understand that in addition to housing, other services would be provided to help them with counseling, employment and other needs. I hope that Edina will be supportive of this effort as I understand they need approval from the City of Edina. Thank you, Mary Rogers i Heather. Braniain From: Andrea.R.Scott @wellsfargo.com Sena Thursday, July 10; 2014.8:36 AM To: Lynette_ Biunno Subject: RE: sewer back -up Thank you for your response. I will reach out to Cassi McMayor regarding a claim, but I am truly interested in prevention and ensuring that (if it is within the City Council's power) funding is being allocated to improving the sanitary sewer system so these back -ups can be avoided in the future. In my discussions with the utility department; it seems that my home will always be affected in these types of rain storms because I happen. to have the lowest'foundation on the street. So I'm left with no recourse to prevent future damage except to ask the'city to improve the sanitary sewer system. I have been communicating with James Hovland about this as well. Andrea Scott 612.708.6536 From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunno@EdinaMN.dovl Sent: Wednesday, July 09; 2014 2 :42 PM To: Scott, Andrea R. Subject: sewer back -up Andrea, we continue to work with the sewer capacity system that we share with many of our other cities located with in the Met Council district. The rain and flooding we just experienced caused back ups in all our surrounding communities too. We have worked hard the last ten years eliminating rain water from getting in the sewer pipes. I.e. Sump pumps in private homes discharging into floor drains etc. This helps us keep more capacity for sewer water. A rain fall over the 100 year flood amount unfortunately overwhelmed our capacity. You can apply for an insurance claim from our city insurance. Traditionally this has not been covered. We switched companies July 1. The new policy sometimes will cover these claims. If you read our quarterly magazine this spring we encouraged all residents to add a sewer back up rider to their home policies. I know all this is not the answer you want. Ann Swenson council Sent from my Wad t Heather Braniain From:. ' Louise Waddick <lawaddick @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West.Apts Mayor and City Council members, I am in favor of Edina supporting the establishment of housing:for homeless youth. Having safe and stable housing, something that I take for granted, is essential for anyone to succeed in life, especially when you are. young. With our wealth in Edina I believe that we have a responsibility to those less fortunate. We all do better when we all do better. Please support this housing, thank you, Louann Waddick LouAnn Waddick lawaddickOemail.com 5304 Blake Rd.So. Edina, MN 55436 cell: 612 - 715-3158 home: 952 - 935-2596 1 From: Willie Anderson [mailto:willie @crowmmn.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 09,'2014 4:31 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: RE: The City of Edina wants to hear from YOU[ yJennifer, I could.fill:this_survey out, -but I would just be checking all the boxes that give the highest praise to the build ing'department. We are primarily a residential contractor and have done dozens of projects in Edina. We`appreciate the corporative style that Edina has with us to provide the best possible service and product for our customers the residents of Edina. Thank you, Willie Anderson The Crown Construction Company, Inc. willie@crowmmn.com 612 - 868 -1899 fax - 763 - 521 -4123 Name: .49 Address: Congregation: im . Dear Edina City Councilmember, e ^ ex ot-to-6q yvr�yhav+,a l� The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name:� Cf2 6.as postage Address: �' ' Ave, . required CAI Virt ssc� Congregation: VL q- CLI9011vnuA f+ CLJAer-a -n Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, �I� )q� Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estiniated.that between'200 ' and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin .County, 66 West is, affordable and supportive housing which.will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 1 G 4801 West 50th Street Name ` pp Edina, MN 55424 Address 7 G a postage required le Name: ark d- postage Address: S S 8 L' C 6-r 6L,?__ regr,ired Congregation: �- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: �lC I Address: LA-0t sSyZ y Congregation: F— C— Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely Name: Address: Congregation:: .elCL,(2, Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerelv. 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage req�Red Name: � 0"Alf "�L-' Address:'`' Congregation: C Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and'end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. .66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, H Name: ���1►`- AJeL0Y\ Address: .Z ff' /M Al Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it, is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th 1 Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage required a.as postage requ'ved Name: J i &g p eve . Address: 577 t'3 'Wr— Ac"C- 'Ct.W-c, w,ry sS�l� Congregation: Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end home essness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, J I Name: eaMdIOL Address: qqo f Congregation: , CDrn�vtuvi, Cam[ Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Postage required Name: kUii�i lr1 dGlf . Address: g46q PhifbMOK Laii�. rdihe Congregation: t=dl V U COVIM 1/iV11 Wf V P414 C kuvz k Dear Edina City Councilmembei, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing'and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between>200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive -housing .which will serve approximately 39 youth and young:adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name: Al e7 4+ Q Address: !0 ® Congregation: LQ, Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 6.49 poste required Heather Braniain From:. Caitlyn Winchell <caitlynwinchell @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 3_:09 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @BeaconInterFaith.org Subject: 66 West Dear Edina City Council, I am writing you to show my support of the new 66 West, affordable housing project for youth in Edina. Homelessness among our youth -is a prominant problem that Beacon Interfaith,Housing is willing to tackle, we just need your support to make it happen. I've been a resident of South Minneapolis and continue to'be part of the community through Lutheran Church of Christ the Redeemer. This project has the ability to improve the quality of life for at risk youth, as well as contribute to the Edina and surrounding communities. The area provides ample opportunity, for these young people to be successful, but we need your support to give them the ability to thrive. A stable, safe home is the foundation young people need to .become successful. Please support the zoning changes to make this project a reality, and invest in the future of Edina. Thank you for your consideration, Caitlyn Winchell i Heather Braniain From: Andrea.R.Scott @wellsfargo.com Sent: Tliursday, July 10, 2014 3:53 PM To• Lynette Biunno Subject: RE: sewer back -up I'd like to attend the meeting. Would you please provide me the information for the meeting? Location and time? Thank you. From: Lynette Biunno rmallto:lbiunno @EdinaMN.govl Sent: Thursday "July 10, 2014,2:37 PM To: Scott, Andrea R. Subject: FW sewer back -up We are continuing to work to lessen the "I and I That term is the separation of storm /ground water from sewer water. I will bring the subject up next Tuesday at the council meeting. Ann Sent from my Pad From: Ann Swenson rmallto:swensonanni @gmail.coml Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:21 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Re: sewer back -up We are continuing to work to lessen the "I and I " . That term is the separation of storm /ground water from sewer water. I will bring the subject up next Tuesday at the council meeting. Ann Sent from my Pad On Jul 10, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Lynette Biunno <Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist <ima e001. jf> 952.-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 g g Ibiunno(&EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN:aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Andrea.R.Scott@wellsfargo.com rmailto: Andrea.R.ScottCa>wellsfargo.coml Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 8:36 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: RE: sewer back -up Thank you for your response. I will reach out to Cassi McMayor regarding a claim, but I am truly. interested in prevention and ensuring that (if it is within the City Council's power) funding is being allocated to improving the sanitary sewer system so these bac' ups can be avoided in the future. In my discussions with the utility department, it seems that my home.will always be affected in these types of rain storms because I happen to have the lowest foundation on.the,street.. So I'm left with no recourse to prevent future damage except to ask the city to improve the sanitary sewer system. I have been communicating with James Hovland about this 'aswell. Andrea Scott 612.708.6536 From: Lynette Biunno lmailto:lbiunnoC@EdinaMN.gov] � Sent: Wednesday; July 09, 2014 2:42 PM To: Scott, Andrea R. Subject: sewer back -up Andrea, we continue to work with the sewer capacity system that we share with many of our other cities located within the Met Council district. The rain and flooding we just experienced caused back ups in all our surrounding communities too. We have worked hard the last ten years eliminating rain water from getting in the sewer pipes. I.e. Sump pumps in private homes discharging into floor drains etc. This helps us keep more capacity for sewer water. A rain fall over the 100 year flood amount unfortunately overwhelmed our capacity. You can apply for an insurance claim from our city insurance. Traditionally this has not been covered. We switched companies July 1. The new policy sometimes will cover these claims. If you read our quarterly magazine this spring we encouraged all residents to add a sewer back up rider to their home policies. I know all this is not the answer you want. Ann Swenson council Sent from my iPad Heather Branigin From: Nancy Gooch <nancy.gooch @gmail:com> ' Sent: Thursday July 10, 2014 7:23 PM To: Edina Ma,.l Subject: 66 West Apartments Mayor and Council, As <a former resident of Edina and current Minnetonka' resident I recognize the need for affordable and supportive housing for homeless young adults in, our southwest suburbs. The Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative has a wonderful plan toprovide that housing, but they need your support. Please approve the 66 West project. Nancy Gooch 5998 Chasewood Pkwy #204 Minnetonka, MN 55343 i Heather Braniain From: dmiller <deanne.miller @gmail.com> Sent Friday, July 11, 20149:46 AM To: Ann Kattreh; Edina Mail Subject: The Fred I work in the evening so I wasn't able to join the "walk through" with the design team ... if it is possible could someone forward these links to them - thank you. for flexibility New Haven has great ideas - http : / /www.ditvofnewhaven.com/Parks /outdooradventure / and Hartford - http: / /www.riverfront.org/ recreation- projzrams /riverfront- adventure -prolzrarn this park is my favorite - it wouldn't compete with - as much as compliment Centennial lakes and,;. Arneson Acres - thus completing a loop of south Edina parks - http: / /www.& a&.org/sister- cities -park finally, Leawood,has good financial ideas - htti)://www.leawood.orgZparks/challengecourse.asl? 1 July 9, 2014 Edina City Council Lq %a I W SD+k S } - d ; nc,, rn 1l 55 y ay n a.'I D r -a- Cry to S We the undersigned are residents of Yorktown Continental Apartments. We wish to speak out in support of the building of 66 West Apartments. We are well aware of the importance of stable, affordable, safe housing for the elderly ... and it should be available for people of all ages in Edina. Many of us are active in our churches or in other volunteer organizations in and around Edina. We believe that Edina is a great community ...and that Edina could offer the residents of 66 West a lot and that they in turn could bring a lot to Edina. Communities that are diverse are rich in so many ways. Thank you for hearing our voices. r va - 1 n V f2 r6 (. ,fin -4k �'^ c Heather Braniain From: dmiller <deanne.miller@gmail.com. > Sent Friday, July 11, 2014 9:58 AM To: :Ann Kattreh; Edina Mail Subject Re: The Fred I attached the wrong link to Leawood - it should be to the city park -- sorry - On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:52 AM, dmiller <deanne.miller@gmail.com> wrote: I forgot to mention v/v the sister - cities park .- the children's discovery nature trail and boat pond you can wade in, along with a fountain and splash pad seem ideal for that setting - and we have nothing like that in the area ... thank you very much. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, dmiller <deanne.millerg&UI il.com> wrote: I work in the evening so I wasn't able to join the "walk through" with the design team ... if it'is possible could someone forward these links to them - thank you. for flexibility New Haven has great ideas - hqp:// www. cityofnewhaven .com/Parks /outdooradventure/ and Hartford - http: / /www. riverfront.org/recreation -pro Qrams /riverfront- adventure- program this park'is my favorite - it wouldn't compete with - as much as compliment Centennial lakes and Arneson Acres - thus completing.a loop of south Edina parks - httv://www.ccdi)arks.orv,Jsister-cities:p finally, Leawood has good financial ideas - httv:// www. lawood .orgiparks /chaflengecourse.g§px 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 15, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. �91N�11� ow e • I�CORPORP`T�O • 1886 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. r City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 My name is Lori Grotz and I have lived at 5513 Park Place for 35 years. ¢ . Could you please help us understand.the implications of Mr. Knutson's decision that the owner of 5508 Dever Drive does not need a Conditional Use Permit to elevate their front entry more than 4.5 feet above the existing front entry elevation on their split level house ? I understand there will be 3 front entries: the garage entry, a sliding glass door entry (to get around code requirements) and the main entry at an elevation,more than 4,5 feet higher than the old entrance elevation. With a garage that will hold 5 vehicles and a house with 3 front entries, in the future, is this property going to be turned into a duplex or a triplex which would not be in the character of the neighborhood. Does the homeowner plan to operate his manufacturing business out of this home ? (He based his business out of his previous home at 5301 Humboldt) With Mr. Knutson's interpretation of Zoning Code 36 -439 subpart 7,1 could say the garage entry is from where you could measure the existing front entry elevation. We ask that the ambiguous Zoning Code 36-439 be reviewed and corrected immediately by the Council. We believe the code as written does not reflect the intention of the City Council. Homeowners and builders will continue to circumvent the code. Mr. Knutson also over ruled the Planning Department and stated that 5508 Dever Drive does not require a front yard setback variance. With the plans as submitted, we believe Mr. Knutson is in error. We would like to. see his calculations. We would like to appeal Mr. Knutson's decision that a C.UP and front yard'setback variance are not needed at 5508 Dever Drive. To whom and how do we appeal? We also request that no building permit be issued until these issues in Section 36 -439 and our appeals have been addressed. Not every'home fits on every lot. Please respond in writing to our requests; thank you in advance for your time service. L all \\ Y 01,/ 6/30/2014 Municode Sec. 36- 439.,Special requirements. T • -& 1 4Y .�, A4 In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter,'the following special requirements shall -apply in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1): (1) Special setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. a• Established front street setback. When more than 25 percent of the'lots on one side of a street- between street intersections, on one side of a street that ends in a cul -de -sac, or on one side of a dead -end street, are occupied by dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows: 1 If there is an existing dwelling unit on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot, the front street setback requirement shall be the same as the front street setback of the dwelling unit on the abutting lot: 2. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lots. 3• In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all dwelling units on the same side of that street. b• Side street setback. The required side street setback shall be increased to that required ,for a front street setback where there is. an adjoining interior lot facing on the same street. The required side street setback for a garage shall be increased to 20 feet if the'garage opening faces the side street. C. Interior side yard setback. The 'required interior side yard setback shall be increased by six inches for each foot the building height exceeds 15 feet. For purposes of this subsection, building height shall be the height of that side of the building adjoining the side' lot line-,'and shall be measured from the average proposed elevation of the ground along and on the side of the building adjoining the side lot line to the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a Mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch -type roof, to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof, or to the top of a cornice of a hip roof. d• Rear yard setback, interior.lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then, for setback purposes, the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to aline drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. e• Rear yard setback, corner lots required to maintain two front street setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to'be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. .- ___, -_:- _ _.n�o. r, „ tin— IFir'7RHT4A Pon iwcf- hffa5% 3a% 2f% 2flibrary .municode.com%2fHTM1_ %9f1 .5157 ° /2fiatPl4 %9f5PR1_ADF_- V3 6/30/2014 Municode f. Through lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. 9• Accessory buildings and structures used for dwelling purposes. Subject to the requirements of subsection (2) of this section, if any accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), or if any addition to, or expansion of, (including, without limitation, an additional story) an accessory building or structure (including, without limitation, garages), is used or intended for use, in whole or in part, for residential occupancy, then such accessory building or structure or such addition or expansion shall comply with all of the minimum setback requirements for a single dwelling unit building. (2) One dwelling unit per single dwelling unit lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to chapter 32. (3) Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above. The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for purposes of this subsection. (4) Minimum building width. No more than 30 percent of the length, in the aggregate, of a single dwelling unit building shall measure less than 18 feet in width, as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. (5) Parking ramps prohibited. No parking ramp shall be constructed in the R -1 district. (6) Temporary retail sales of evergreen products from conditional use properties. The city manager may grant a permit for temporary retail sales of evergreen products, if: a• The owner of the property or other nonprofit group approved by the owner conducts the sale. b. The duration of the sale does not exceed 45 consecutive days and does not start before November 15 in any year. C. The sale area is located in a suitable off - street location that does not interfere with traffic circulation on the site or obstruct parking spaces needed by the principal use on the site. d. The sale area is not located within 200 feet of a property zoned and used for residential occupancy. e. The hours of operation do not extend beyond 10:00 p.m. f• Signage is limited to one sign per street frontage with an aggregate sign area not exceeding 100 square feet. (7) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of, eAsting - single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split level dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. Subject to section 36- 434(9), the first floor elevation may be increased more than one foot. The provisions of this subsection shall apply to all single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units, including units in the h Floodplain Overlay District. Any deviation from the requirements of this subsection shall require a variance. / 9 Cot1e !.9.92, § 350.11(7); Ord. rro. 2013 -7: § 4. 8 -5 -2013) • _ -�- - - -i__: , nti— pr re„ rm_ 1FtJJ;7RHTM Rea uesY— MtDs% 3a% 2i% 2flibrar v. munlcode. eom% 2FHTML %2i'15157%2flewI4 %2fSPBLADE... 213 f ' Lori Grotz o - - From: Jackie Hoogenakker- <JHoogenakker @EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:52 PM To: lori @lorigrotz.com Subject: FW: 5508 Dever, elevation two front entrances Jackie Hoogenakker, Administrative Support Specialist L1 952 - 826 -0465 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 JHoogenakker@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Roger Knutson (mailto:RKnutson @ck- law.com] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 12:16 PM To: Kris Aaker Subject: RE: 5508 Dever, elevation two front entrances. Kris - please call me to discuss, 651 - 234 -6215. Ay � I;assume, based upon the material I was given: (1) the front entry elevation of the tear down was 890.8, and (2) the home was a "split level dwelling." City Code section 3 6-43 9 provides "...the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the "front entry elevation of the home that was torn down." The term "entry level' is not defined in the City Code. The plain meaning of the term is that it is the level or elevation at which you can enter the dwelling. The term "first floor" is not defined in the City Code but the terms "story" and "half story" are defined terms. The Code also provides that "floors not meeting the definition f of half story] shall be deemed a story." The City Code defines "story" to mean "Story means that portion of a building included between the surface of any floor and the surface of the floor next above, or if there is not a floor above, the space between the floor and the ceiling above. A basement with more than 50 percent of its exterior wall area located entirely below the proposed ground elevation adjoin' ing the basement shall not be counted as a story." The term "split level dwelling "4s defined in the City Code as "a dwelling that has two or three short sets of stairs, and two to four levels. The front entry is on a middle floor between two floors. The front door opens in a foyer or entry area located in a wing off the main house. From the front entry, a short flight of stairs leads up to the top floor and another short flight leads down." City Code Section 36 -439 requires that the first floor "or" entry level elevation, not both, be more than one foot above the entry level elevation of the home that was removed. The proposed home has an "entry level elevation" at 890.33 which is lower than the elevation of the tear down. Any ambiguity in the meaning of the zoning ordinance is resolved in favor of what the property owner proposed to do. Frank's Nursery Sales Inc. v. City of Roseville. 295 N.W.2d 604, 608 (Minn. 1980). To be effective, any restriction on land use must be clearly expressed. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen. 342 N.W.2d 335,340 (Minn. 1984). Based upon the facts which I assuming, my conclusion is that a variance or CUP is not required. From: Kris Aaker [mailto:KAaker @EdinaMN.gov] Sent. Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:17 PM To: Roger Knutson Subject FW: 5508 Dever, elevation two front entrances Roger, Would you please comment on this proposal? Thank you, Kris Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Q 952-826-04611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 KAaker(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov/PIanning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 8z Doing Business From: Richard Sahara [ mailto •rsahara(cbclearstonetech.com] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 8:30 PM To: Cary Teague Cc, Kris Aaker; Lydia Ong Subject: 5508 Dever, elevation two front entrances Hi Cary and Kris, During the meeting on Wednesday, one idea that was floated up is to have two entrances to 5508 Dever to address elevation issue. The attached file describes the proposal. We will be preparing the CUP/Variance also. Thanks, Richard Heather Branigin ati,d From: Sue Rofidal <suerofidal2 @c6mcast:net> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 8:23 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 72nd and France Avenue To Mr. Teague and The Planning Committee, It is with great concern that I send you this email..OUR AREA NEEDS NO MORE TRAFFIC!!!! All of this .new building is "way over the top" : The proposed apartment, retail and row houses planned for 7200 France will:greatly increase traffic and send cars into the neighborhood, including near by Cornelia school. What happened to our Comprehensive.Plan allowing for only 4 story buildings ?? What good is this if we continually change these height limits as we did for The Westin, One Southdale Place, Birofka Furniture and I would imagine the new buildings at Byerlys ? This is a residential area, not a high rise area. PLEASE DO NOT APPROVE THIS!!!! Just because the developer probably paid too much for this property, don't punish the residents,in the area with a very dense, overly populated property. PLEASE STOP THIS CRAZINESS 'NOWIII Thank You, Sue Rofidal 7125 Bristol Boulevard i Heather Braniain From: Jack Rice <di ecompany @aol.com> Sent: Friday, July.,11, 201411:32 AM To: James Hovland; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague@edinarealty.com; Swenson Ann Cc:' Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague Subject 3922 West 49th Street Dear Mayor and Council members: We will be unable to. attend the July 15, 2014 council meeting and include our written comments in support of the proposed Mortenson development at 3922 W. 49t' Street. We live at 4001 W. 49ffi Street, four houses to the West of the subject property. We have no objection to rezoning the property. from R -1 to R -2. Our home is R2 as is almost.the whole south side of West 4.9 Street from France Avenue to Maple Road and about one half of the north side of West 49t` Street from France to Townes Road. Our home is on a lot that was redeveloped from an existing R -2 double bungalow in 2006. This year, 3929 West 49th Street was completed as a redeveloped R -2 double unit and 3932 West 49h Street (an existing double) has been approved for demolition and plans submitted for redevelopment. The property is bordered on the east by a four story apartment building, on the south by commercial property fronting on W 49 'h Street and on the west by R -2. It seems that the request to rezone R -2 is reasonable under the circumstances. We understand the proposed plan Would require a 2.5% variance for lot coverage if the council agrees with the rezoning to R -2. That also seems reasonable. In summary we support Mr. Mortenson's proposed development. We know of no neighborhood objection. Our opinion is the R -2 zoning is appropriate for the. site and that redevelopment of this property would be beneficial to the neighborhood. Thank you, Jack & Ede Rice 952- 927 -8372 1 Heather Branigin From: jsriesterer @comcast.net Sent: Friday, July 11, 20145:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contac# Us form submission Name: Jim Riesterer Organization: Website: Address 1: 6900 Mark Terrace Drive Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55439 Email: isriesterer@comcast.net Phone: 952- 829 -7212 Referrer: google Message: Summer is finally in full swing and more and more people are out walking and biking. Unfortunately, each time they do, they risk injury and death while walking along Valley View Road between Braemar park and Gleason road. In the past year, if anything cars are going faster endangering the many walkers and bikers who must use the roadway due to the lack of sidewalks. It is particularly bad from 3 =6:30 p.m. on weekdays and anytime there is an event at Braemar arena or fields. There are a number of small steps that could be taken to help significantly increase public safety: 1. Add additional speed limit signs - look to the "redesigned" 70th street for a model where there are at least 6 in a one mile stretch of street. Currently there are only two speed limit signs and they are all but obscured by shrubbery and easily missed 2. Paint the 30 MPH limit on the pavement to ensure visibility of the speed limit - given the forested nature of the lower end of the road people think they are driving on a country road 3. Add at least 2 4 -way stop signs - look to Gleason Road between Valley View and Braemar for a model where this was implemented for safety.'The blind curve at Dakota Trail and Valley View is particularly treacherous and I've personally had to jump out of the way while walking the dog on several occasions as cars come roaring up the hill. 4. Aggressively enforce the speed limit for a time (probably not practical) 5. if none of the above, reduce our property tax assessment significantly - perhaps by 50% - in line with houses fronting I -35 or Hwy 62 where there is similar fast moving traffic! I look forward to your response. Jim Riesterer 6900 Mark Terrace Drive Edina 1 Heather Braniqin From: Dr. Mark Weisberg <weispsymus@earthlink.net> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 201412:16 AM To: ; Edina Mail Subject: FOR CITY COUNCIL: Alteration of bike trail. 9.. Mile Creek- July 15 vote Importance: High Hello, I am writing to express my concern about the proposed changes to the placement of the 9 Mile Creek bike trail near Cahill Rd, and to` ask that the bike path be re- directed back to it's originally proposed position, 40 feet north of the creek. I live at 6605 Cahill Rd, Edina 55439. M_ ine is one of the homes backing on to 9 Mile Creek. 1.1have been aware that a bike path is planned tq be,extended along 9 Mile Creek, and markers were set for that previously. I am writing because the markers for,the proposed trail have been changed to be much closer to the creek than previously planned. This apparently happened at a City Council meeting in late May. After talking to Eric Nelson with the Three Rivers Park District office, l found out that this change occurred because 3 homeowners on the other side of the creek protested, and had the.trail markers moved closer to the creek - and t :here'fore in plain view of my home as well'as the 2 homes to the West of mine. This not only compromises our privacy but could affect our property values as well. The other 2 homeowners and I voiced our concern to'Eric Nelson. I also called and left phone messages for several city council members (Ann Swenson, Josh Sprague, Mary Brindle). Mr Sprague encouraged me to send this email message as well. For the sake of fairness, the other homeowners on the South side of the creek (on Cahill Rd) and I ask that the trail be brought back to its original proposed location further North of the creek. Also, Eric Nelson said that it was also possible to plant trees South of the proposed trail, to provide more privacy for us. We would ask for this as well. Thank you for your attention to this. Sincerely, Dr'Mark Weisberg 612 =520 -9159 Then, around Memorial Day weekend 1 Heather Braniain From: Rena Turnham <turnhani @bitstream.net> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 8:12 AM To: Edina Mail ' Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org; ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org; Jackie Sullivan; 'Tom Gehlsen' Subjects Support for 66 West Apartments! Dear Mayor Hovland, City'.- Council Members, and Planning Commission Members: I am writing to you as a clergy person serving in Edina to raise my voice with those that support 66 West Apartments. I ask you to please consider the impact you can have on young people and this community. For years I have come to know and respect Edina's ability to create and maintain great schools and engaged vibrant neighborhoods. It is time for Edina to take this same leadership stance in creating space for our youth to have the kind of start to their lives that Edina is known for. As city officials and community leaders you have the power to, clear the pathway to help create affordable, supportive housing foe, young people Who have graduated from foster care or have determined they need to leave a dysfunctional and conflicted home environment. This is not currently available in Edina or nearby suburbs. And 66 West is an ideal location as it is close to jobs, transportation and services. Local homeless youth feel alone, discarded, and ashamed and the last thing they want to do is to draw attention to themselves. And that's why others Like myself have come forward to advocate for them. I have personally known kids in my own local community of Orono that have found themselves homeless. It happens. And it happens in our communities. Communities where there is more than enough for all. have already sent a letter to you all last -month with a petition signed by some of our parish members. From that you can see that we believe that Youth Housing in Edina Matters! Please:j:oin.me and countless others that stand for those that can't stand for themselves... for the good of the entire community. Please help to continue to create the kind of community that Edina prides itself on being by supporting the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a rea I ity. Thank you for your consideration, The Rev. Rena Turnham Deacon, St. Stephen's Episcopal Church , Edina 2 Heather Branigin From: john schlobohm <johnboyinslp @hotmail.com> Sent Saturday, July 12, 2014 12:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West - affordable housing project Dear Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council, My name is John Schlobohm. I am an Edina resident and am a member at Lutheran Church of Christ the Redeemer (5440 Penn Ave S, Mpls). I am also a supporter of the 66 West affordable housing project. 'My church has made an initiative this year to learn more about youth homelessness and to take action to help stop it.' It has been a shocking reality to learn that so many kids do not have homes or are not welcome in their own home, to no fault of their own. It's even more shocking to realize that this is happening in our own local neighborhoods. I am a supporter of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and hope the city of Edina will move forward with helping 39 young people get off the streets and have a place they can call home - a place to feel safe and comfortable. I feel strongly that the city of Edina and its leadership should support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. Sincerely, John Schlobohm Nine Mile Village resident Edina, MN 1 Heather Branigin From: Bob Rofidal <broldal @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 20141:43 PM 70: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 france Dear. Cary: The recent developments near Southdale and Byerly's are reason for great concern. We do not know the impact of traffic and,now a six story building is being proposed at 7200 France. The Comprehensive Plan calls for four stories and in addition, the housing density is off along with the floor,ratio. It is too big and it will create huge traffic problems. People now go south on Cornelia past a school and east on 72nd to avoid the light at France and 70th. This will make it worse. We need more time for study especially if they can't follow the Comprehensive Plan.' Sincerely, Robert E.Rofidal 7125 Bristol Blvd Edina, MN 55435 -4109 952 - 927 -8594 1 Heather Braniain From: Paul Hughes Sr: <paul.sr @peoplehelpinc.com> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 4:17 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Planning Commisssioners Attachments: Edina Plannning Commion.docx Dear Cary: Please provide this a copy of this letter to each member of the planning commission prior to Tuesday 7 /15th meeting. Thank You Paul Hughes, Sr. People Help, Inc. 612 760 5461 cell 800 444 9077 Helping People Grow... Professionally@ 1 July 11, 2014 Comments for Planning Commission Members: RE: DJ Architecture, Boisclair & NHH Properties Proposal Dear Commission Members, I am a concerned resident of Edina & have witnessed the commission's past & present protocol in administering decision= making regarding applications such as the one submitted by the above named partners, having been a resident for 35 plus years. My: concerns centers around a combination of: • What is the motivation on the part of both the partners submitting the proposal, and the Planning Commission's:'true concern' for the City of Edina's growth in conjunction with the consequences of interrupting and changing the present quality of living conditions at this physical location? • The Planning Commissions precedent pattern of 'Decide first & justify later' regarding projects submission and approvals. • What are the ultimate consequences of approval or not. Motivations: One could presume that ultimately (even though it would most probably be denied) economics in revenuefor the partners and,additional tax base for the City has to be a part of the underlying motivation for any approval. My sense is that no members of the partnership or perhaps the commission members live in the immediate area that would be affected by approving this proposal. That in of itself is a, major concern! Is one of the commission's motivational factors to bring more traffic flow to this 7200 France Ave location? Because, the compounding traffic flow problems on France Avenue and the Southdale shopping area have done;nothing to enhance the day -to -day citizens ability to experience reasonable mobility.in this neighborhood. Now add 195 units of living quarters multiplied by simply'one car' per resident of this apartment & retail project and what have you done to the actual car count moving in and around this location? The combination of all traffic flowing north & southbound on France Ave. at 72nd is already an extended parking lot. If southbound vehicles can only turn right into the 'retail' complex then watch out for all of the rear - ending heading southbound at 72nd street. The city planners already disposed of one's ability to turn left onto France Ave heading north from 72nd street, now add to the traffic flow impeding factors of the number of vehicles from the proposed apartments who would be turning right out of the proposed, complex onto 72nd heading east and a cumbersome problem will have grown to a significant traffic problem. 1 Can you even envision;the,traffic,turmoil you'll,: create just trying to make a right -hand turn onto France Ave? Thus the next'option is for the potential apartment resident to turn- left onto 72nd and clog up all the remaining side streets attempting to get to France Ave. or Hwy 100 heading northbound /southbound or even to Southdale. . Next I ask why would a proposal presented to this commission immediately ask for the commission to avoid compliance with already established city building codes. (six stories in height; housing density criteria; and floor area ratio's)? Did they not due their own due diligence on this proposal upfront or is their strategy to present asking for considerations - expecting to be turned down by the commission only to be::informed by this commission to 'modify' their proposal and resubmit hoping the resubmitting would garner a sense of favoritism from the commission for'showing a sense of collaboration'? Hopefully, you'll excuse my cynicism but members of this commission know how things get done within the political arena of city government and so do those making this proposal! It is typically us residents who are the last to know and are forced to live with the consequences of others decisions. Planning Commission precedents:' On numerous occasions over the years as an Edina resident I have participated in the planning commissions protocol and process with proposal such as the one referenced within this letter. I have witnessed time and time again wherein residents have not been allowed -to be a part of the commission thinking& planning agenda's 'until the project, considerations has moved beyond the desires of those residents most affected by decisions from the commission. This'commission owes the most affected residents of any consideration by this commission to be 'partners' from start to finish. That means the moment a thought jumps into the commissioner head from any suggested third party of what things should come to pass - residents should be notified and `present in all communications regarding any considerations, period! If this commission wants to achieve'buy -in' from the residents they should also allow two randomly selected residents who would be most affected by their decisions to be involved & participating at every single meeting regarding potential proposals. My concern is that often the members of the commission are only'indirectly' affected with the consequences of their decision because they live some where in Edina, not at the place of the proposition consideration. I am amazed how frequently that the residents are left out of the communication process regarding planning commission meetings until the 'commission deems they can have enough documentation protocol in place' to control residents input or objection commentary. 2 This process where' 'ithe residents are informed of a vital. meeting regarding propositions 15 minutes prior to the meeting only displaysto, me a lack of inclusion on the part of the commission. Perhaps the fear is the proposition would not warrant sponsorship by the residents therefore the commission wants to eliminate any pushbacks until they can get legs-to the- proposition justified We residents should be tuned into everything you commissioners are tuned into and at the same time you are made aware of upcoming scenarios. We should have your calendars published excluding of course your personal affairs.. But when is comes to our city affairs, we should be in the know. That way we could build the level of trust and confidence that your responsibiliti es & accountabilities to us resident taxpayers will be fulfilled. Ultimate consequences This proposal under consideration will not;serve the city of Edina! It will put money in the pockets of those proposing and.build up the city's coffers with more tax dollars. It will display a lack of commonsense regarding an already overburdened traffic problem on France Ave. It will ask you commissioners to make an exception to a city codes that are unnecessary. I thought you were placed in these positions to 'protect the integrity of the . Edina. community standards', not modify them to outside interests. Not approving this proposal will bring back much of the confidence residents have lost in this commission's decision making of the past. jamming it down our throats even though we disapprove of it will display another act of government arrogance to the wishes of the people most affected. And you all are aware of the present level of confidence that is lacking in government agencies and continues to erode daily in this State and Country. Don't add to that erosion process, please! Sincerely, Paul B. Hughes 3 Heather Branigin From: Cathleen Godsall <cgodsall @live.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:20'AM To: Edina Mail Subject: In support of 66th West Supportive Teen Housing Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson, Thank you for your continued commitment to public service and most especially thank you for the time you have spent as you thoughtfully consider making affordable, supportive housing for homeless teens in our western suburbs a- priority! While our state legislative support of this issue is reflected in the passing of a funding bill that funnels $100 million for affordable housing to all parts of Minnesota, our local suburban community is where we all have to come together to make this a reality and make a difference in the lives of our next generation. The 66th West Supportive housing project focuses on teens ( 18 -21. y /o) who find themselves needing safe, affordable housing while they work and stay in school in order to become productive adult citizens. For 22 years our family has enjoyed the blessings of a living in the safe, welcoming, educationally progressive community of Edina. I realize that my 25 and 26 y/o children would have been at a loss to build their emerging professional lives without a supportive functioning family, safe housing and access to good schooling in their teen years. As a concerned neighbor, I believe this 66th West Supportive housing project is needed and attainable! As a social worker I know what a challenge affordable, accessible, safe housing is for so many. Being able to help my fellow citizens enjoy the safety and comfort of a home and access to good school systems matters deeply to one. Affordable, safe housing is the foundation for keeping our communities stay vibrant and healthy! As a member of the Outreach committee at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, I have come to trust that Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative's well established record in developing affordable, supportive housing makes partnering with them the correct path to take in order to successfully provide safe, affordable, supportive teen housing ui our suburbs. I. ask for your support in achieving this goal. Sincerely, Cathleen R. Godsall, LSW 5601 Johnson Dr. Edina, MN 55436 Heather Branigin From: betty ann wiens <w.bettyann @gmail,com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 201412:24'PM To: Edina Mail C -i• Ibions @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West Apartments Hello - This is to inform you of our strong support for the 66 West Apartments project. I have long been a supporter of the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and have toured and followed the progress of many of their endeavors. I am always greatly impressed by the quality of- their,knowledge of thedemographics of an area, - thorough planning process as well as actual construction and completion of a project. In every instance their projects have been an asset to the neighborhoods and have provided a much needed resource for the clientele they serve. Edina and the western suburbs are not immune to problems of homelessness, abuse, etc. There is a need for this type of housing. I hope we step up to the plate and support the 66 West Apartments. Sincerely, Cornie and Betty Ann Wiens 4929 Green Farms Circle Edina, MN 55436 1 Heather Bra. gin From: Jane Dosedel <jdosedel22 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 12:57 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: DBonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West Mayor Hovland and City Council: My name is Jane Dosedel 4370 Brookside Ct #303 Edina 55436 I am writing to show my support for 66 West. I am in favor of this project because I believe that it is very difficult for young adults to find a place to live that they can afford. The economy has shown job growth, but there must be housing available that is affordable. The Southdale area is the perfect area for this project. It has transportation available and could serve many southwest communities. ask your careful consideration of this project. Sincerely, Jane Dosedel i Heather Branigin From: suekrachko @hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 3:50 PM, To: Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Follow Up Flag: Follow up'` Flag Status: Flagged Name: Susan Rachko Organization: Edina resident Website:. Address 1: 7465 West Shore Dr. Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55435 Email: suekrachkoa,hoimail.com Phone: 952- 920 -9222 Referrer: someone—in—the—neighborhood Message: Very disturbed to hear and see the six -story France Ave. rental/retail project and its size.My husband and I are extremely sad to see the Fred close and now you have added insult to injury by planning this monster of a project.Our neighborhood is already conjested and now it's only going to get worse. Really, are you serious? .Heather Branigin From: suekrachko @hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 4:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Susan Rachko Organization: Edina resident Website: Address 1: 7465 West Shore Dr. Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55435 Email: suekrachko@hotmail.com Phone: 952- 920 -9222 Referrer: Message: I just found out recently that the Fred Richards manager,Jeff, will no longer have a job once the golf course is closed. From what I have been told, he has not even been offered a job within the city. After 20 plus years of loyal service I say, "shame on you ". I have had direct contact with for several years since our home is adjacent to the course and he has been a delight. Why would you want to have someone with such great work ethic leave. Don't want to hear that it's a budget issue since I am sure you could utilize him at Braemar. The city just continues to frustrate me. Bad enough we lose a golf course that with alittle advertising and promoting could do better especially now with so many city courses closed because of flooding but compound the issue with terminating a productive and delightful gentleman. Heather Branigin From: Allison Sneller <allisonpirri @hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 4:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Concerned! Dear Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council - It is with grave concern that.l contact you in regards to the proposed *massive* development at 72nd,and France.. Having seen the artist's rendering of the proposed. property, I am stunned that this is even under consideration by the Edina Planning Commission. -The fact that this literally abuts a large residential neighborhood is more than enough reason to dismiss this outrageous proposal. Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, this project would have a tremendous adverse effect on the very..nearby Cornelia Elementary. Are you aware of the number of children who walk to school along 72nd St.? Or the number of school buses (from the elementary, middle and high schools) that traverse 72nd St. in the morning and afternoon? 'Or the fact that our South Cornelia neighborhood provides little to no "exit" options for cars trying to depart,this colossal monstrosity? In fact, the primary exit from the neighborhood would be directly in front of the elementary school? Or the limited access to and from France Ave at 72nd St.? I am also curious as to why such a proposal is even under consideration, given its gross violation of the city's own comprehensive plan. I am also wondering how this possibly fits into the living streets initiative the city is supposedly undertaking. I trust you will share my serious concerns — as well as those of my many neighbors -- at the City Council meeting on Tuesday, July 15th, as well as with your colleagues on the Planning Commission. This is not an appropriate development for this sitel We moved to Edina trusting that the city would look out for the best interests of its residents, not the pocketbooks of developers. Sincerely, All Sneller 7208 Cornelia .Dr. 952-406-8021". Heather Branigin From: Kathy <oconnellgang @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 7:06 PM To Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: France and 72nd st development To city council members, Please see my enclosed email to Cary Teague. At the upcoming city council meeting, could you please discuss and address the concerns I have outlined below? Thanks, Tom O'Connell Begin forwarded message: From: Kathy <oconnellgang(a,comcast.net> Date: July 13, 2014 at 6:48:56 PM CDT �To: "cteague(a edinamn.gov" <cteague(n edinamn.gov> Cc: Tom O'Connell <tom.oconnellQecolab.com> Subject: France and 72nd st development Cary, My name is Tom O'Connell, and I live in the Cornelia neighborhood. I saw an article on the proposed 6 story mixed use development at France and 72nd. I am strongly against the proposed development for the following reasons. 1) The height and size of this project for this parcel of land is extremely outsized and out of character for the neighborhood. 6 stories will be overwhelming the neighboring houses, and overshadow the whole neighborhood. 2) The density (30 units per acre) of the project is almost double the city limits of 50 units per acre and the floor ratio of 1.41 almost triples the city limits of 0.5. Not only would this building be out of place for a primarily: single family home neighborhood, it is out of place for anywhere in Edina. 3) The intersection of France and 72nd is already a busy intersection. So much so, that the city recently restricted traffic leaving 72nd to right turns only onto France. The placement of this building's primary drive would force all of the north bound traffic back through the neighborhood. There is no other way out. I frequently walk that intersection, and it is already a tough walk. I couldn't imagine what it will be like with all the added traffic, not to mention the restaurant and retail traffic. That is also already the main street for all southbound traffic coming out of the neighborhood. How will this be addressed? 4) 195 new housing units will add a countless increase to the educational system. Has there been a projection to the increased head count to Cornelia elementary school? The school is building new classrooms due to lack of enough space to meet the current needs of the school. This additional stress will not only tax :the, classrooms, but the common spaces, which haven't been increased to accommodate the current new classrooms. How will this be addressed? Please present this to the city council on Tuesday July 15, and forward this email on to the planning commission. Sincerely, Tom O'Connell 7333 Oaklawn Ave 952- 649 -7125 Heather Branigin From: Katie Mader Halcrow <katiemader @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:18 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcastnet; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Cary Teague Cc: Casey Halcrow; Katie Mader Subject: Concerns about 72nd & France Development Dear Mr. Teague, Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members, My husband and I live at 7313 Cornelia Drive (one block south of 72nd & Cornelia). As a resident very "near to the proposed- development of the property on the corner of 72nd and France, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposal as it currently stands. At first when I heard there was a 6 -story complex proposed at 72nd and France, I thought there must have'been some mistake. To ascertain exactly what this project would entail, I immediately watched the video of the City of Edina's Edina Planning Commission meeting on June 25th, 2014! While the . idea`of 100 %underground parking, the incorporation of green principles, and the promised,20% affordable housing all sound positive, I am greatly concerned about this project and the precedent this sets for other areas abutting residential, single- family homes in the city. I'have some major concerns: 1. Them ass and density of7the development. a. Current Comprehensive Plan states that there will not be Building Heights higher than 4 stories..This proposed development is.6 stories'— a 50% increase on current regulations. As Susan Lee stated, six stories have been approved near the Southdale area — but that area is not in proximity to any.residential building. This kind of development is unprecedented on the west_ side of France — in particular because of the residential. neighborhood to which this proposal is adjacent. b. Current Comprehensive Plan states that there will not be Building Density more than 30 units per acre (very recently, this was only 16 units per acre); this proposed development is 50 — a 66% increase on current regulations and over 200% increase on previous regulations. c. Current Comprehensive Plan states that the Floor Area Ratio will not be more than .5; the proposal is for 1.88 —an over 275% increase. Why do we have regulations in the Comprehensive Plan if these regulations can be so significantly changed for any given development? 2. Traffic congestion (due in large part to the proposed building density and floor area ratio). a. There is already a huge mixed -use area under construction across the street at Byerly's, which will add significantly to traffic congestion .on France. This was a major concern with that project when it was proposed for development. The. idea of putting a - what seems to be - even larger and more dense multi -use building with almost 200 units as well as restaurants and retail will continue this issue on France as well. b. In addition, as Michael Schroeder noted, residents who will now be living in the complex (at minimum around 200 cars - more likely 300 +) who desire to go north or west will go down 72nd to Cornelia. This will turn the street in front of Cornelia Elementary School into a thoroughfare, making the area less safe for children walking to and from the school. A grassy median will do nothing to stem this traffic. Indeed, if the developer were to begin to adequately address this concern, Cornelia Drive would be dead -ended at Lynmar Lane, splitting the road in two. This would allow current neighborhood residents to turn left and go to the stoplight at Hazelton to access France and the influx of new residence would be funneled back onto France Avenue from 72nd ensuring that the school area would remain low- traffic and safe. The developer mentioned that Sunrise senior residence as a comparable site to the new development in terms of a multi -unit residential property in the area. I am sure I do not have to point this out to the Council or Commission, but there is a large difference between the traffic density incurred by the Sunrise senior residence and the proposed site development with its 200+ units of development. When my husband and I moved into the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina in 2011, we chose our home in large part due to the location's quiet neighborhood. We felt that Edina, with its Comprehensive Plan, would protect us from this exact type of development, which - as it stands - would likely lead to decreased real- estate values, severely increased traffic, and a substantially un- residential back -yard view. It is my hope that the consequences of this project will be considered and the project will be significantly modified (in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan) to protect all Edina residents from significantly changes to their neighborhood landscapes. Thank you very much for your time and your service to our city, Katie & Casey Halcrow katiemader(cD-gmail.com casey.halcrow(a)-gmail.com 952 - 994 -0631 Heather Braniain From: Bob Rofidal <brofidal @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 7200 France Hi Jim, we spent five years working on a Comprehensive Plan. We should follow it. 6 floors is too big. Bob Rofidal 1 Heather Braniain From: Stephen Lukasewy¢ <Iuka0009 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 10:52 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave & 72nd Project Dear Mr Teague, My name is Stephen Lukasewycz, I am an Edina resident in the Cornelia neighborhood. My wife Christina and I have three children (two going to Cornelia elementary this year) and overall we have been quite happy with decision to move this area of Edina. a One of my neighbors brought to my attention a massive apartment building project recently presented to the Edina Planning Commission. I have two concerns regarding this- project: 1) The numbers are staggering, rental units; 45,000 square feet 25 row homes. 2 restaurants. This project is too big for the lot, and too big for the neighborhood. The France Ave corridor is already congested and much of the apartment building construction in the area is not even completed. 72nd and the adjoining side streets were never intended for such high housing density. Similarly, Cornelia elementary, is not prepared for such a massive expansion of the student base. 2) Lack of communication regarding City planning. I learned of this project only through discussions with my neighbors, who themselves learned of the project serendipitously. Like all my neighbors, I am heavily invested in Cornelia and I would expect that my city government would inform my neighbors and me in the planning stages of 'such a large and potentially neighborhood - changing project. Please present this letter to the City Council at the Tuesday, July 15th meeting and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Stephen Lukasewycz, MD 4428 Gilford Drive Edina, MN 55435 763 - 229 -7191 1 Heather Branigin From: Angie Buyse <iseauski @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13,2014'10:54 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Avenue site Dear Mr. Teague: I am an Edina resident and live in the Cornelia neighborhood. I am shocked by the amount of apartments going up around Southdale and the surrounding area, and now have been informed of another attempt by a developer requesting permission for a project that far exceeds the City's Comprehensive Plan _for that area. I wanted to write and let you know that both my husband and I are completely AGAINST allowing this project to take place. It is too big, too dense, and will cause'too much traffic to an area that is already overly congested... plus, it exceeds the height, density; and f loor'area allowed for the area. Please present my. email to the City Council prior to the meeting on Tuesday July 15, and please forward this message to the Planning Commission. Thank you! Angie & David Buyse 4729 Hibiscus Avenue IseaUski@wnail.com i Heather Braniain From: Nancy <nrystrom @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 11:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Project at France Ave and 72nd Street Dear Mr. Teague: I am: an Edina resident iri;.the: Cornelia area. I am very concerned about the proposed mixed -use development at France Avenue and 72 ".d Street. This project is too big for the space and:is inappropriate for the neighborhood., France Avenue is already overburdened'and traffic will be worse with other projects being built. We do not need another' project that will exacerbate the situation. I understand that the city would need to amend its comprehensive plan to allow..for the proposed housing density and building height, as well as floor area ratio. That does not makesense given the current buildings and uses in the area, as well as those buildings in the construction process. Please share my deep concerns with the City Council and with the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Nancy Rystrom Edina Resident 1 Heather Branigin From: Cheryl Cooper <sidderbug @yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 201410:45 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave. and W. 72nd St. Development Dear Mr.Teague, > Our city council should be looking out for the best interests of our residents and neighborhoods, not an over zealous developer! This project is much too big for the space, is inappropriate for my or any- :residential neighborhood, and will add-far.too much traffic to an already overburdened France Avenue as well as my neighborhood with our elementary school where my grandchildren attend, near by. This project, involving a partnership of DJR`Architecture, Boisclair Corp.. and NHH Properties far exceeds the City's Comprehensive Plan. As a an extremely concerned resident of Edina, I explore you to please present my email to the Council this Tuesday, July 15, 1214 and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. We do not want this type of massive complex in our residential neighborhood! Sincerely, Cheryl Cooper Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Braniain From: Yanan Yang,< ya ng36998@yahoo.com > Sent: Sunday, July 13,201410:30 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six -Story France Ave - 72nd street rental /retail project in Edina Dear Cary, My name is Yanan Yang.and we li.ve'on 7216 Oaklawn Ave for over 18 years. We just got a notice that that is a rental /retail project plan on France ave "and'72nd street. Based on the info. we got, we really think this project is too, big for the space, is inappropriate fora residentiaFfieighborhood; and will add too much traffic to an already.overburdene.d France Ave: Please help us to stop this plan'ASAP'and we will also attend the council meeting this Tuesday to against this plan. Thank you Yanan Yang 1 Heather Branigin From: Julie Chamberlain <juliecchamberlain @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 10:19 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Opposition to 7200 France Proposal Mr. Teague, My name is Julie Chamberlain; I am an Edina resident in the Cornelia neighborhood. I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposal for a 6 -story tall complex @ 7200 France Ave. The proposed project is grossly oversized for the space and would greatly add to the congestion of the whole France Avenue area, and increase the amount of traffic on neighborhood streets (72nd, Cornelia Drive - including right by Cornelia Elementary School, etc). This project does not fit well within the residential side of France Avenue and I do not see any benefits for the neighborhood and community. I ask that my email be presented to the Council on Tuesday evening, in opposition to the proposed project. Thank you; Julie Chamberlain Heather Branigin From: Gary Cooper <garycooper86 @yahoo.com> Sent:. Sunday', July 13, 2014 10:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Avenue rental /retail project Sir We live about two blocks or less from this location and chose to live here based on the quiet of our neighborhood with the: opens pace and across the street. This project would transform our neighborhood. We will already have to deal with the changes that our occurring on France Avenue to the traffic changes. This,building if built will be inappropriate for a residential area that is serene on most days. It will be too large for the area and will bring in more street congestion in the nearby area. The city approved an loverhaul on 70th Street to alleviate crowding on the street and relieve traffic in the area of Cornelia School. We urge you to do your best to keep our area the quiet and safe place that it is. Very Respectfully Gary Cooper Heather Braniain From: Nancy Thorvilson cnkthorvilson @grnail.corn> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:56 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Edina Mail Subject: NHH Properties proposal for 7200 France Avenue Dear Mr. Teague, Mayor Hovland and City Council members, I am extremely dismayed by the direction in which the Edina Planning Commission appears to be moving with its recent emphasis on expanding housing density in the southeast corner of the city. My parents purchased their house in the South Garden Addition in 1965, and I purchased it from them in 2004. Current traffic in this area is horrendous. Midday transit times on France Avenue from the Crosstown to 494 can take upwards of 15 -20 minutes. In that 16 block stretch there are about 15 -17 semaphores. With the recent addition of nearly 1000 dwelling units in the Greater Southdale area, one can add at least 6000 -8000 additional vehicles to the traffic mix. There are also considerations for adding more residential units to the Pentagon office area, which al ready has traffic problems. And now an additional 195 units are proposed for 7200 France Avenue! There are multiple reasons why this site is TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE for residential use, particularly at this density of 50 units per acre. - France Avenue itself from MN 62 to 82nd Street has NO RESIDENCES. This is because it is a major arterial street and is for business use. Sheer noise and inconvenience of egress /ingress would make it an undesirable location. If the proposed use is for low -cost housing, this undesirableness is an insult to any potential residents. Adding another 2000+ vehicles daily ( residents and retail customers) to 72nd Street will incredibly inconvenience South Garden Addition residents. There are only a few streets that allow ingress /egress - 72nd Street /Hazelton Road, Cornelia Drive, Wooddale Avenue; West Shore Drive, and the frontage road on MN 100. Of course, another semaphore at 72nd Street and France Avenue could be added this would definitely make this one of the most semaphore -dense stretches in the metro area. The water problem in the lower parking lot has always been there since the site was initially developed after the gravel pits were closed. Is filling the property going to be considered? And what about mitigation? The sheer massiveness of the complex, particularly height, is unacceptable. There is nothing this massive on the west side of France between 76th Street and 68th Street, and there are ADJACENT residences to this site. If the developer states that they cannot afford the development without the density, THAT IS NOT THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION'S PROBLEM! Furthermore, extremely high density use, whether it be residential or business, is actually counterproductive to good planning. Although ostensibly it would appear to result in increased tax revenues, it also requires more expenditures for infrastructure and personnel. At densities this high, there will be more police and fire calls, requiring additional personnel on ALL shifts. I would urge the Planning Commission to rethink their approval of this project. Mixed retail/commercial use is entirely appropriate - residential use is NOT. I believe the city council should also be unwilling to proceed with this project at this time. Sincerely yours, 1 Nancy K Thorvilson, MD Heather Branigin Front Oliver Thoenen <sistnix @yahoo.com> .Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:39 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Letter from Edina resident regarding proposed development at 72nd & France Avenue Dear Mr. Teague, I am forwarding a letter from my mother, Marjorie Thoenen - an Edina resident - at her request and for, your- consideration. Quote: 'With regard to the proposed development at 72n& Street and France Avenue, the project is too dense for the space, inappropriate for the neighborhood, and would overburden 72nd Street." "Please present a copy of this letter to the Council on Tuesday, and forward; a copy to the planning commission." "Thank you. Marjorie Thoenen (7203 Bristol Circle, Edina, MN 55435)." Unquote. Oliver Thoenen i Heather Branigin From: Sue Soule <sulb3so @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:26 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed six -story complex at 72nd and France PLEASE FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dear Mr. Teague: I would like to say that this latest proposal is unbelievable but, unfortunately, it is part of an ugly pattern of total disregard for the residents of this area and its history. Has anyone on the City Council or Planning Commission read the Comprehensive Plan lately? Or the traffic study on which they based the changes to France Avenue which stated that traffic was already at level E, which does not stand for excellent but quite the opposite? The proposed project at 72nd and France would be laughable in its effrontery were it not for the fact that our city, leaders are,taking it seriously.It exceeds current density, height and floor area ratios. In the words of former Edina Planning Commissioner Julie Risser in regard to a previous development proposal: "I think it will leave many residents of Edina wondering what their city code means. Is it something that will be there next week or next month? This is something we should honor." Lest you think we're being petty, during the time my husband and I have been tax - paying residents of Edina, there have been: Expansions ,of.Southdale Expansions of Galleria Expansions of Fairview Southdale and nearby medical buildings and new medical buildings Centennial Lakes retail, housing and five office buildings The Westin Hotel and condo. high -rise The apartment building at 69th and York The One Southdale complex The three buildings on the Byerly's property The in- process Wickes /Borofka site The City Council has adopted "density" as a community value, but I would like to see what would happen if that were put to a city referendum. The Edina residents I know did not move here because they wanted to be downtown, Uptown or Eden Prairie East. They wanted quiet residential neighborhoods with good. schools and parks. I think this area of Edina has borne more than its share of growth. If the city commissioner and council.members want to ride roughshod over character, codes and comprehensive plan, then let's spread the wealth around. Let's put an 18 -story high -rise on the old public works site and put a housing development around Bredesen Park. I thought our City Council was supposed #o represent our residents, not every developer that comes courting. Sincerely, Susan..Soule and Gary Soule West Shore Drive 2 Heather Branigin From: Robert Hodges <roberthodges5802 @msn.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:24'PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 6 Story France Ave Rental /Retail Project - France and 72nd Mr Teague, Please pass this e-mail on to the City council for Tuesday evenings' meeting as well as the planning commission. My wife and I own property at 7404 Oaklawn Ave, Edina, MN 55435. My wife and l are broth disappointed with the recent news of this rental and retail project proposal at the corner of France Ave and 72nd St. The total number of units + retail space will over burden this portion of France Ave which is already going to see a large influx of people and traffic with the new high rise going up across the street'at Byerlys. We are asking that this project is removed from further consideration. Sincerely, Robert and Kathy Hodges ph# 952- 835 -5802 Heather Branigin From• Upender <kaul us @yahoo.com> Sent:.. Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Six Story France Ave Rental /Retail Dear Mr, Cary Teague, I am a resident of edina and live at 7313 Glouchester Dr, Edina for the past ten years. I have been informed that there is a proposal to build a six story complex on' France & 72 nd street. I as a resident of the area want to voice "my concern that this development is inappropriate and too big for the space.,,lt will increase traffic and cause issue due to heavy traffic to nearby Cornelia elementary, school. As a Tax payer and Citizen,,.) urge you that the city, council looks after, the interests of its residents and neighborhoods, and not an overzealous developer. I :would request you to present this view to the on Tuesday July 15th meeting and also forward;this to the Planning Commission. J Thanking you Upender Nazir 7313 Glouchester Dr Edina MN - 55435 1 Heather Branigin From: Susan Petrosky <susan_p @ix.netcom.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:17 PM To: Cary Teague; Mark Petrosky; Kimberly Subject: Six -story complex on France Mr. Teague: I received a flier this afternoon regarding a proposed plan by,.a developer to construct an apartment /retail complex at France and 72nd. I live on Oaklawn which is six blocks away, and I feel the plan is very poorly suited for this location for several reasons. 1. Traffic is a problem on France during rush hours and on Saturdays. These dense population complexes will make the problem worse. There are eight fairly new complexes already built or proposed for the area. There will be two new apartment complexes at Byerlys, the Westin, the complex behind CVS, Southdale residential complex, the complex to be built where Wickes was, the apartments behind the funeral home, and the Cedars of Edina. There are big complexes on York. When there is a funeral at the Cremation Society, parking is congested on the street. France Avenue lanes are being narrowed for bike and pedestrians. Why add more traffic to congestion and extra dangers. 2. Cornelia school will be overwhelmed with students. 3. Cars run through the stop signs in the neighborhood now. The children walking to and from school will be put at a higher risk. Police have told us that the intersection at 72nd and Claremore is one of the worst in Edina for stop sign running. 4. Creating jump around shopping from mixed use complexes will make driving frustrating. 5. The developer and the planning commission are driven by proposed revenue. 6. Edina is losing its prestigious reputation and becoming "CementCity." The rain water, will run 'off into overwhelmed sewer systems. The city infrastructure will need to be updated at a cost to taxpayers. 7. A quality of life will be lost. Edina prides itself with good schools, parks, and friendly residential neighborhoods. People who already live in the areas west.of France will consider moving to get out of congestion and Edina. Please present my letter to the City Council and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. SusanPetrosky 7204 Oaklawn Edina, MN. 55435 Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Branigin From: Wattson, Erica < Erica.Wattson @edinaschools.org> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:16 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Opposed to france avenue development Dear Cary, My family lives on Larkspur Lane, and the proposed apartment building on 72nd and France would affect my family in negative way. My two children are 9 and 11 years old -and LOVE to ride their bikes around Edina. We already have problems of people speeding down 70th, but we.don't need hundreds of people cutting through our back neighborhood racing to cut through where children can play safe in streets right now. I fear the amount of traffic that it will bring through our streets. This will make it unsafe for our children. This project is also too large for this space, it is not conducive to making this a neighborhood community where we know our neighbors and our neighbors are committed to our city. If you would like to talk to me please email or call me at: Erica Wattson 4904 Larkspur Lane Edina, MN 55435 Erica Wattson Advanced Academic Specialist Young Scholar Specialist Math Olympiad Coach Highlands Elementary School Edina Public Schools 952.848.4567 (direct) Erica.Wattson edinaschools.ore 1 Heather .Branign From: Carolyn Dahl <CarolynCDahl @msn.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:07 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Development at France and West 72nd Cary - I am very opposed to the proposed development at France Avenue and West 72nd. I have been a home owner in the neighborhood for 24 years. This project is too big and is inappropriate for a `residential neighborhood.This, proposed building would add too much traffic .to an already busy street. I have started to avoid France Avenue whenever I can because of all the traffic. There are already new apartment buildings being built within a few blocks of this corner. Why do we need another apartment building? There is anew apartment building at the corner of 69th and York (on Southdale parkinglot) and a new apartment building to be built on Byerly's property. There is an apartment building that was built just a fewyears ago behind CVS on York. The proposal is for a 6 story building and would require the city to amend its comprehensive, plan. I believe that that plan is in place for a reason. Please stick to the plan! Please present my email to the Council on Tuesday and,please forward a copy to the Planning Committee. Thank you, Carolyn Dahl 6840 Point Drive 1 Heather Branigin From: Lynn Swon <swonlynnr @aol.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:00 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: New development proposed for France and 72nd Cary - I was stunned to learn of the new development proposed for 72nd and France. The size is way out of proportion to the surrounding property and far exceeds Edina's comprehensive plan. This complex will add an enormous amount of traffic to an already very crowded France Avenue. It looks like Edina is trying to become Minneapolis. Let Minneapolis be Minneapolis and Edina be Edina. Adding density to Edina's housing is not what the citizens want. Developments such as this put Edina at risk of becoming a much less attractive place to live. This hurts housing values and the long -term viability of Edina as a great place to live. Please listen to the residents (voters) of Edina and stop this development. Please present this email to the City Council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you. Lynn Swon Heather Braniain From: ChadNSmith @eaton.com Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:44 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six Story France Ave Hello Mr. Teague This project is too big for this residential area. We already have two large apartment buildings going up across the street. France Ave. can barely handle the current congestion, especially at the 72nd intersection. Please present my email to the Council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the planning commission. Thanks Chad Smith 7017 Bristol Blvd Edina, MN 55435 1 ,Heather Branigin From: Sophie Moser <moser.sophie @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:42 PM To: Cary Teague Cc:. moserkr @yahoo.com Subject: Questions Regarding Proposed Mixed Use Development at 7200 France Ave Good Evening, My husband and I live at 7133 •Cornelia Dr with our two children, and we recently became aware of the proposed mixed use ;development at 7200 France Ave. We have done as much research as we can via the Internet, an& we have some concerns regarding this proposed development that we would like expressed to both the Planning Commission as well as the City Council. There are already three new apartment buildings going into this area (one near Southdale, Lennar Project (6725 York Ave Sy';.kd.one:in the Byerly's redevelopment) as well as a.proposed senior housing development at 6500 France Ave. This is a significant amount of new high density residential development in close proximity, especially given that both the senior housing project at 6500 France Avenue and the Lennar.project,have. densities of 50 units per acre, which is a significant increase over the Edina standard 30 units per acre. This project would be the`third exception to Edina's Comprehensive Plan in a very short amount of time. Our concerns are twofold: 1) Have you studied the impact of the all of the additional residential units on traffic in the area? France Ave is busy and Cornelia School generates significant traffic on 70th, 72nd,. and Cornelia. Hazelton can also be very busy due to Sunrise and funeral home. ' Until recently we were able to use 72nd to turn both left and. right onto France, but that is now impossible due to the creating of a left hand turn lane on France. We have tried to use Hazelton, but it feels unsafe due to the parking that frequently occurs on both sides of the street. Oftentimes, there is only enough room with cars on both sides of the street to allow for one lane of traffic, and cars frequently go fast through there. Added traffic is only going to increase this safety concern as Hazelton is one of the few ways to go north on to France in the neighborhood. 2) Have you studied the capacity of Cornelia Elementary given the sudden increase in population due to the apartment developments? This is an abrupt population change:in the neighborhood that could bring anumber of school -age children especially given the affordable housing component of the plan. School age population changes are usually gradual that school districts can plan for unlike this change which brings a number of units online in a short amount of time. Cornelia Elementary school is already space constraints; the school is already adding onto the building to accommodate full -day kindergarten. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the meeting to express my concerns if the opportunity would allow. If you have any questions, please contact me on my cell phone at 202 - 725 -5950. Thank you, Sophie and Keith Moser Heather. Branigin From: Michael Kirch <mwkirch2000 @yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:36 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development at 72nd and France Ave Cary K. Teague, AICP Community Development Director Dear Mr. Teague, As residents of the South Cornelia neighborhood, we would like to officially register our opposition over the proposed mixed -use development currently in discussion for 72nd and France Ave. There are several reasons why we believe this project must not go forward: 1. The plan has the potential to create nightmare traffic issues along France Avenue. Every summer we have lived inr our neighborhood there have been significant construction projects along Fran_ ce Aven'ue. These construction projects result in delays and_ aggravation. 2. France Avenue is not large enough, to support the additional traffic that such a large development, Would create. There are already units planned for the former Byerly's across the street from this proposed development as well as the new development at One Southdale just two blocks. away. These projects are distinct from another development plan currently being prepared -for our'southern border. We are concerned our residential area will exceed an optimal level of saturation. I. The proposed development is dependent upon the city amending its comprehensive plan in several ways. These amendments include changing the four story limit, allowing for increased housing density and approving an increased floor area ration. As a residents of Edina, we expect for the city to hold.to its current plans. The limits in the current plan represent important safeguards to quality of life issues and-help to guard against overdevelopment. We purchased our home in this area of Edina for specific, reasons, and this overdevelopment jeopardizes the quality of life we currently maintain as well as our property value. 4. The encroaching overdevelopment of France Avenue is detrimental to the residential community of South Cornelia. The cities current plans to create distinct 1 and community- focused neighborhoods is undercut by the consideration of such massive, faceless, residential projects. We ask that our email be presented to the Edina City Council on Tuesday and forwarded to the Planning Commission. We will continue to monitor this issue closely. Sincerely, Michael Kirch and Brad Wallenberg 4504 Belvidere Lane Edina, MN 55435 mwkirch2000(&-yahoo.com bradwallenberg(cr-yahoo.com Heather Branigin From: Shawn Oldham <shawnoldham @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:29 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: URGENT- Six Story France Avenue rental /retail project - SAFETY CONCERNS Hello Cary, Today I became aware of a potential project for a massive six story rental/retail complex at the corner of France and 72nd street. This project has me deeply concerned. I believe it would be a, significant safety risk to the children in the neighborhood and have an overall negative impact on the families in the neighborhood. Key Concerns: • Safety risk to the neighborhood children due to increased traffic • Safety risk to the children attending Cornelia Elementary School (located blocks from the site) • Proposed project is to big for the space and doesn't align to the comprehensive plan. • Moving from 4 story buildings to 6 story buildings • Housing density increase from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre • Floor area ratio from 0.5 to 1.41 • It's inappropriate for a residential neighborhod • Will add to much traffic to an already overburdened France Avenue I ask you to present these concerns to the Council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. As you weigh my communication and concerns, please keep in mind this is the first time I've communicated with a govemement organization. I've been moved to speak up since moving this project forward will have a dramatically negative impact- on my family along with my neighbors. I'd ask you to personally help block the project moving forward and look out for the best interests of the neighborhood. Kind Regards, Shawn Oldham Heather Branigin From• . jwang0072 @gmaii.com Sent Sen Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:26 PM To: Cary.Teague Subject: 6 story. France rental retail project. Hi Cary . I am 6-'residence of 7324 Oaklawn. I am voicing my concern on another large development in the Cornelious neighborhood. I plan to attend Tuesdays council meeting. Jerry Heather Braniain From: Judy Turner <judyturner2004 @ yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:20 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: PROPOSED SIX STORY COMPLEX AT 72ND AND FRANCE This has to be the worst use of that property...... You have apartments behind and to the south of that complex,. with people moving in and out and in and out causing traffic behind Glouchester Drive. I think with the apartments going up at Southdale and the apartments going up across the street at Byerlys, why in the world would we need more apartments and retail ? ?? With the traffic on France and 72nd now so screwed up by not being able"to turn north on to France, and the left turn on to 72nd street that is so poorly marked how do you think this would not affect the traffic? I would like you to have a good look at that left turn on to 72nd street. The sign "Left lane must turn left" you are almost on top of the sign when you turn..... know where does it say 72nd street, just a yellow sigh with dots on it, I have almost missed that turn and I have seen so many drivers swerve as they were in the lane and had to get out, or they had to swerve to get into the turn; I believe it is very, dangerous. I have called the the street works dept, but no calls back and it seems tome that no one cares. I would really like to talk to someone about that arealt is very dangerous. This complex looks like the horrendous mess the City of Wayzata made of their downtown with "Folkstone" what a mess that is, a woman was hit with in the complex because of the traffic within the area , had to have both legs amputated and than died, I don't thing Edina needs anything,more now. lets get the app'ts at Southdale rented, the app'ts ( condos) at Byerlys sold, Lets get the rest of the Weston sold and then maybe think of more but the city council is gong nuts, growing the city is on thing but this is definitely outrageous. Please read this email at the City Council Meeting on 7/15. The people need to be heard about this mess. Please forward this to the Planning Commission also_ Sincerely, Judy Turner 7319 Glouchester Drive, Edina, 952820-0505 Judy Turner Judvturner2004@vahoo.com 1 Heather Branigin From: Katie Mader Halcrow <katiemader @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:18 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Cary Teague Cc: Casey Halcrow, Katie Mader Subject: Concerns about 72nd & France Development Dear Mr. Teague, Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members, My husband and I live at 7313 Cornelia Drive (one block south of 72nd & Cornelia). As a resident very near to the proposed development of the property on the corner of 72nd and France, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposal as it currently stands. At first when I heard there was a 6 -story complex proposed at 72nd and France, I thought there must have been some mistake. To ascertain exactly what this project would entail, I immediately watched the video of the City of Edina's Edina Planning Commission meeting on June 25th, 2014. While the idea of 100% underground parking, the incorporation of green principles, and the promised 20% affordable housing .all sound positive, I am greatly concerned about this project and the precedent this sets for other areas abutting residential, single - family homes in the city. I have some major concerns: 1. The mass and density of the development. a. Current Comprehensive Plan states that there will not be Building Heights higher than 4 stories. This proposed development is 6 stories = a 50% increase on current regulations. As Susan Lee stated, six stories have been approved near the Southdale area — but that area is not in proximity to any residential building. This kind of development is unprecedented on the west side of France — in particular because of the residential neighborhood to which this proposal is adjacent. b. Current Comprehensive Plan states that there will not be Building Density more than 30 units per acre (very recently, this was only 16 units per acre); this. proposed development is 50 — a 66% increase on current regulations and over 200% increase on previous regulations. c. Current Comprehensive Plan states that the Floor Area Ratio will not be more than .5; the proposal is for 1.88 —an over 275% increase. Why do we have regulations in the Comprehensive Plan if these regulations can be so significantly changed for any given development? 2. Traffic congestion (due in large part to the proposed building density and floor area ratio). a. There is already a huge mixed -use area under construction across the street at Byerly's, which will add significantly to traffic congestion on France. This was a major concern with that project when it was proposed for development. The idea of putting a - what seems to be - even larger and 'more dense multi -use building with almost 200 units as well as restaurants and retail will continue this issue on France as well. b. In addition, as Michael Schroeder rnoted, residents who will now be living in the complex (at minimum around 200 cars — more: likely, 300 +).who desire to go north or west will go down 72nd to Cornelia: This will turn the 'street in front of Cornelia Elementary School into a thoroughfare, making the'area less safe for children walking to and from the school. A grassy median;will do nothing to stem this traffic. Indeed, if the developer were to begin to adequately address this concern, Cornelia Drive would be dead -ended at Lynmar,Lane, splitting the. road in two. This would allow current neighborhood residents to turn left'and go to the stoplight at Hazelton to access France and the influx of new residence would be funneled back onto France Avenue from 72nd ensuring that'the school area would remain low- traffic and safe. The developer mentioned that Sunrise senior residence as a comparable site to the new development in terms of a multi -unit residential property in the area. I am sure'"I do not have to point this out to the Council: or Commission, but there is a large difference between the traffic density incurred by the Sunrise, senior residence and the proposed site development with its 200+ units of development. When:my husband and I moved into the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina in 2011, we chose our home in large.,part due to the location's quiet neighborhood: We felt that Edina, with its Comprehensive Plan, would protect us from this exact type of development, which — as it stands — would likely lead to decreased real- estate values, severely increased traffic, and a substantially un- residential back -yard view. It is my hope that the consequences of this project will be considered and the project will be significantly modified (in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan) to protect all Edina residents from significantly changes to their neighborhood landscapes. Thank you very much for your time and your service to our city, Katie & Casey Halcrow katiemaderO- gmail.com cases. halcrow(c_gmail.com 952 - 994 -0631 Heather Branigin From: Cosette DeCesare <cosettedecesare @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 7:33 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed 72nd and France Ave project Dear Mr Teague, I am writing to you in regards to the proposed rental /retail project for the area at W 72nd and France Ave. I am strongly against this development. My God! It's way too large for this space and it will dramatically increase traffic near the elementary school. My husband and I deliberately spent our hard earned money on a home In the suburbs. if we had desired a more urban feel, we would have sought that out. We did not. I am frustrated that Edina is going along with the "New Urbanization" movement. It is perfectly ok for adults to choose the kind of environment in which they want to live. City governments, including Edina's, need to pay more attention to the desires of their residents and not those of the progressive new urban movement. This movement wants us all living on top of one another, riding bikes or taking mass transit to work, and walking to the grocery store. Think Uptown (or soviet style block housing). This living situation is fine for people who so choose. It's not what I chose. So, please-tell the powers that be to stop trying to force it upon me. Sincerely, Cosette DeCesare 7433 West Shore Drive Edina MN 55435 Please present my email to the city council on Tuesday the 15th and forward this email to the Planning Commission. My husband and I Sent from my iPhone Heather Braniain From: Lee Doucette <Idoucette7213 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 7:24 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - 7200 FRANCE To whom it may-concern, With the 232 apartments, going up at Southdale and 193 apartments starting to be constructed at Bylery's'my question to the City of Edina (both elected and appointed office holders) is do we really need an additional 195 apartments (plus commercial) at 7200 France? If the latest development is approved it would mean a total of 620 apartments (with all the people and vehicles that involves) will be added along four blocks of France Avenue. Additional tax revenues may be tempting, but with what is already under construction when will enough be enough? We would urge that the proposal be denied or at least significantly downsized. Lee and Vivian Doucette 7213 West Shore Drive Edina 55435 1 Heather Branigin From: Betty Dalasta <dalasta @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 20146:52 PM To: Cary . Teague Subject: six story France Ave rental /retail project 7200 France`Ave To; Cary K. Teague, AICP, Community Development Director From: Gary and Betty Dalasta!: 7301 Cornelia Drive Edina, Mn 55435 Re: Inappropriate six -story rental /retail: project at 7200 France Avenue, Edina, MN Please assess /study traffic flow in the vicinity of 7200 France Avenue before giving any further consideration to this inappropriate project. With the new Byerlys store and two new apartment buildings in the process of construction directly across the street, this area would become more congested than the current traffic overload in this area. The increase of traffic from this new construction would affect the entire neighborhood west of France and 72nd. The safety of children must be considered because obviously traffic from the new rental /retail project would need to use Cornelia Drive since France Avenue is already overloaded. We have a neighborhood school and park /playground area that would be adversely affected with the"construction of this project. We have had enough of developers creating massive traffic flow, problems in our, neighborhoods. Stop this nonsense. I Enough is enough. Please present our email to the Edina Planning Commission and to the City Council in hopes that our elected officials will take into consideration the existing traffic congestion in our area and how adversely this new project will affect so many of us. How would this project benefit our neighborhood? Is this project in the best interests of the residents? Or is this project of benefit to developers? Think hard before going forward with this construction. It just does not make sense on so many levels. Do you have our backs or are your backs getting scratched by developers? Thank you for considerations given to veto this project. 1 Heather Branigin From: Kathy <oconnellganggcomcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 6:49 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Tom O'Connell Subject: France and 72nd st development Ca ry, My name is Tom O'Connell, and I live in the Cornelia neighborhood. I saw an article on the proposed 6 story mixed use development at France and 72nd. I am strongly against the proposed development for the following reasons. 1) The height and size of this project for this parcel of land is extremely outsized and out of character for the neighborhood. 6 stories will be overwhelming-the neighboring houses, and overshadow.the whole neighborhood. 2) The density (30 units per acre) of the project is almost double the city limits of 50 units per acre and the floor ratio of 1.41 almost triples the city limits of 0.5. Not only would this building be out of place for a primarily single family home neighborhood, it is out of place for anywhere in Edina. 3) The intersection of France and 72nd is already a busy intersection. So much so, that the city recently restricted traffic leaving 72nd to right turns only onto France. The placement of this building's primary drive would force all of the north bound traffic back through the neighborhood. There is no other way out. I frequently walk that intersection, and it is already a tough walk. I couldn't imagine what it will be like with all the added traffic, not to mention the restaurant and retail traffic. That is also already the main street for all southbound traffic coming out of the neighborhood. How will this .be addressed? 4)195 new housing units will add a countless increase to the educational system. Has there been a projection to the increased head count to Cornelia elementary school? The school is building new classrooms due to lack of enough space to meet, he current needs of the school. This additional stress will not only tax the classrooms, but the common spaces, which ;haven't been increased to accommodate the current new classrooms. How will this be addressed? Please, present this to the city council on Tuesday July 15, and forward this email on to the planning commission. Sincerely, Tom O'Connell 7333 Oaklawn Ave 952 - 649 -7125 Heather Branigin From: Casey Halcrow <casey.halcrow @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 5:33 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave 6 -Store Rental 77 Dear Mr. Teague, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development of the property on the corner of 72nd and France. I would like this letter and my opinion to be represented at the upcoming City Council,meeting, as work will prevent me from being present personally. Further; I would like a copy of this letter forwarded to the planning commission. My wife and I moved into the- . Cornelia neighborhood of Edina in April, 2010. We chose Edina, and this location, for several reasons. Among these were the quaintness` and quiet neighborhood feel of the area. It is near the Southdale area, but, at the same time, seems far away from any excessive urban development. Further, we:felt that Edina, with its Comprehensive Plan, would, protect us from this exact type of development! With the already overly -dense development in the Byerly's area, we feel this type of development is contrary to the overall plan for Edina's development and contrary to our desires as homeowners. Put simply, the discovery of:this development for us has changed our mindset from owning a home that we could happily retire in to potentially having to place our house on the market for sale. It is our fear that this type of "urban development" inside the'city of Edina will change the quaint, family - oriented, residential feel of (this part of) Edina, and, further, will make locations such as ours much less desirable. Overnight, we will be faced ` with decreased real- estate values, severely increased traffic, and a massive 6 -5tory complex staring at us in our backyard. If this development reaches a stage where it looks inevitable, we will be faeed will the frustrating reality of probably have to sell our home. It -is especially frustrating to consider that this is even possible, especially given that we "chose" Edina, when, in hindsight, Minnetonka, Wayzata, or Eden Prairie might have been the wiser choice. It is my hope that the consequences of this project will be considered and the'project will be stopped, or severely modified (in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan) before families like ours are forced to reconsider our choice of where to live. Sincerely, Casey Halcrow 7313 Cornelia Dr, Edina, MN 55435 Heather Braniain From: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 5:25 PM To. Cary Teague Subject: 72nd and FRANCE TO: Cary K. Teague, AICP, Community Development Director Members of the Edina City Council Members of the Edina Planning Commission My goodnessl What are you all thinking? Seventy - second Street should be a gentle, welcoming entrance to the basically single - family Cornelia neighborhood. It should not have a monolith, taller than anything currently on the west side of France between 62 and 494. You need to amend the Comprehensive Plan to allow six stories? Clue #1- NO You need to amend the Comprehensive Plan to increase the density to 50 units per acre? Clue #2 - NO You need to amend the Comprehensive Plan to increase the floor area ratio to 1.41? Clue #3 - NO Don't make me go on about access and traffic patterns, how our streets were designed to not go through to the multiple- family units to the south, how we don't need more people cutting off the corner at 70th and France through our neighborhood, how now we can only go south from 72nd and France. Or, if I'm looking for a "luxury apartment complex," am I going to consider one with low- income housing right across the courtyard? Really? And the greenspace /courtyard needs to be along 72nd Street, not hidden behind walls. In my opinion the whole proposed project needs to be re- designed, not just brought down to three or four stories to - comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Sincerely, Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. 952 - 835 -9755 islandbreezes9 @Rmail.com 1 Heather Braniain From: Marie. Sullivan <mariesullivan87 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 5:21 PM To: Cary Teague i. Subject: France/72nd development Dear Mr. Teague, I am asking that you please forward the email I sent you on July 7th to all the members of the Planning commission as well as the; city council. I am unable to attend_ the July i5th'meeting,so would like my email to stand in for me as a resident strongly opposed to this development. Thank you. Marie Sullivan 4512 Hibiscus Ave.. 1 Heather Branigin From: Shirley Doyle <doyle002 @dmn.edu> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 5:11 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 6 story France Ave rental /retain project Please add our names to the neighbor citizens concerned about this project. We agree with many of our neighbors that this project is too big for the space and will have an adverse affect on an overly- crowded France Ave. Please share our concerns at the Council meeting this Tuesday and with the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Shirley and Timothy Doyle 4445 Andover Rd Edina 55435 1 Heather Braniqin From: Mark Manfred <markjulie44 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13,,2014 5:04 PM To: , Cary Teague Subject: France development Mr. Teague, This email addresses the 72nd & France development. As a home owner in the Cornelia area .) am strongly against this development. It is way, way too large. We already have too many high density projects under construction for this area. Also, the Cornelia area already has our share of low income housing. Please discontinue this project or severely decrease the size. Julie Manfred, - 4445 Dunham Dr. 1 Heather Branigin From: John.Budd <johnwbudd @yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 4:59 PM To: Cary Teague Subject:. 7200 France Ave project Dear Mr. Teague, As a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood, I am writing to express my strong. objections to the proposed development at 7200 France Avenue. This, is an,excessively large development for a small space'adjacent.to our neighborhood and its school. Traffic on France Avenue is particularly bad throughout the week;and I shudder to think how this will make it even worse, which will further cause moretraffic to seek alternative routes through our neighborhood. And what about additional strains on our water and sewage.systems? Moreover, its hard to see how its responsible to approve plans at this time. Apartments are being constructed at the SE comer of Southdale and right across the street fro m,7200 France (Byerlys redevelopment). And France Avenue is being narrowed and reconfigured. At a minimum, these developments should be completed so that we can observe the actual influences on traffic and other resources before planning is allowed to proceed on another high - density project..; Fask you to convey my objections to the Planning Commission and to the City Council. As a resident, its extremely frustrating to watch these developments and the worsening traffic and strain on our neighborhood resources. I hope that moving forward, the Planning Commission and the City Council will re- double their efforts to listen to the residents. After all, it is us that those bodies should be representing. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, John Budd 4417 Fondell Dr Edina Heather Braniain From: Dennis Fernkes <fern7313 @scc.net> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 4:46 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six -story France Avenue rental /retail project Cary, I am requesting that the Six -story France Avenue•rental /retail project being proposed at.72nd and France be rejected. This location cannot handle the traffic and density,of this site. Residents to the west;need'th1s 72nd'street access to France Avenue because we are`pretty much :locked in with very few.other options. Also; :the scale of the development does not properly fit there. Thank youefor,your consideration, Dennis Fernkes - Sent from my Wad. Heather, Branigin From: Popehn, John <JPopehn @HL.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 4:23 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 72nd and France Project Cary, I'm a resident in the Cornelia neighborhood and wanted to let you know:that the proposed 72nd and France project appears to me to be way too large, denseand generally inappropriate forthe area selected. This intersection (particularly the east side) is already overburdened with heavy traffic, retail, and new apartments and the proposed project vastly;exceeds the the City's comprehensive plan in terms of density (over 66% in excess of the current limit). Why would the .city grant an allowance for a project that proposes to do exactly what the limits were intended: to avoid? Not to mentionthis project would be less than 1500 feet from an elementary school playground, which creates a number of additional concerns. We are on the cusp of another economic bubble yet we're seriously considering the allowance of a project that plans to flood a residential area with additional housing and retail capacity before analyzing the impact of the massive unfinished project currently underway on the other side of the street? Please present my email to the city council on Tuesday and please forward my email to the planning commission. Thanks and have a great weekend. John Popehn Please consider the environment before printing. This e-mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient, or an intended recipient's authorized agent, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message or any attachments is strictly prohibited..lf you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail message and any attachments from your computer system. 1 Heather Branigin From: Warner <pdwl @aol.com> Sent:. Sunday, July 13, 2014 3:32 PM „ To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France ram completely opposed to the potential development at 7200 France. Not appropriate at all. The "trip ends" that would be generated by a proposal like this would'completely ruin traffic flow on France. In addition, we have way too much retail;in the area already. Please include my email to the city council and.copy it to the planning;commission. Peter Warner 4445 Fondell drive 952 - 927 -6217 Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Braniain From: Allison Sneller <allisonpirri @hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday,July 13, 2014 3 :22 PM To: Cary Teague Subject Concerned! Dear Mr. Teague -- It is with grave concern that I contact you In regards to the proposed *massive* development at 72nd and France. Having seen the artist's rendering of the proposed property, I am stunned that this is even under consideration by the Edina Planning Commission. The fact that this literally abuts a" large residential neighborhood is more than enough reason to dismiss this outrageousaproposal." Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, this project v'ould have a tremendous adverse effect on-.the very nearby o Cornelia Elementary. Are you aware of the number of children who walk to school along 72nd St.? Or the number of school buses (from the elementary, middle and high schools) that traverse 72nd St. in `the'morning and afternoon? Or the fact that our South Cornelia neighborhood provides little to no "exit options for cars trying to depart this colossal monstrosity? In fact, the primary exit from the neighborhood would be directly in front of the elementary school? Or the limited access to and from France Ave at 72nd St.? I am also curious as to why such a proposal is even under consideration, given its gross violation of the city's own " comprehensive plan. I trust you will share my serious concerns -- as well as those of my many neighbors -- at the City Council meeting on Tuesday, July 15th, as well as with your colleagues on the Planning Commission. This is not an appropriate development for this site! We moved to Edina trusting that the city would lookout for the best interests of its residents, not the pocketbooks of developers. Sincerely, Allison Sneller 7208 Cornelia Dr. 952 - 406 -8021 Heather Branigin From: Ashley Eastman <ashley- larson @bethel.edu> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 3:03 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Regarding 6 Story France Ave Rental Mr. Teague, We were just informed about the proposal for the 6 -story France Avenue rental property at 7200 France Avenue. As a homeowner in this area, I feel compelled to speak out against this project. My husband and I have two children and live directly across from Cornelia Elementary School. We believe that this project is too big for the allotted space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood, and will add too much traffic to an already overburdened France Ave and our neighborhood with the nearby elementary school. There are multiple apartment complexes going up in this area and we certainly do not need another. We believe that our city council should be looking out for the best interests of its residents and neighborhood and not the developers. If a project like this went through, it would adversely affect the likelihood of our family staying in the Cornelia neighborhood. As we will not be able to make it to the council meeting on Tuesday night, we would be very appreciative if our voice was represented. Thank you for your time on this matter. Steve and Ashley Eastman 7117 Cornelia Drive Edina MN 55435 Heather Bra nigin From: Darla Paulson <djpaulson005 @gmaii.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 2:31 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France and 72nd Development Proposal Mr. Teague -- I have.just recently become aware of a massive development proposal at France and 72nd. This monstrosity would surely impinge on the residential neighborhood at the very door of the development. This plan to way too big for the space and actually presents drive -in roads on 72nd! We have already been asked to endure a massive project on France and Hazelton and surely don't want another one within a block of where families live. Not only will the development be unsightly in our residential. neighborhood, but the size and scope is intimidating! The surge of traffic will be a hazard to our children and neighbors who walk their dogs, bicycle, push baby buggies, etc. along 72nd Street. Cornelia Elementary is just around the corner!! I would appreciate your presenting my e-mail to the Council onTuesday and please forward a copy to the Planning Commission. I am unable to attend the Council Meeting, but hope my concerns will be considered. Thank you for your consideration. Darla J. Paulson 7212 Glouchester Dr. Edina, MN 55435 1 Heather Branigin From: Kirby Schulberg, <kirbyschulberg @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July;13, 20141:59 PM, . To: Cary Teague' Subject: No High Density housing a0.200 France Ave! Mr. Teague, We would like, to voice our opposition to, the proposed high density rental /retail project for 7200 France Avenue. This proposal is too big for a residential neighborhood, and will add too much traffic and congestion to our neighborhood. The variances to the comprehensive plan for Edina are too numerous and would have a high negative impact on the quality of life in this residential area. Please present our email to the Council on Tuesday July 15th and please forward this email to the Planning Commission. Please, please work for a better, smaller, less dense use of this space. Many thanks, Steve and Kirby Schulberg 4421 Fondell Dr Edina, MN 55435 1 Heather Braniain From: Michael Ebnet <alsuperwriter @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 1:52 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six story development on France Ave at 72nd Mr. Teague, The proposed development at France -.and 72nd is way too big for the site. It will increase traffic beyond what France Avenue can handle and will send additional traffic into the adjacent neighborhood. The monstrous height will loom over the neighborhood and I believe will cause a taking, sending home values down. I also believe that the neighborhood will sue over this and' it will prove costly to the city. Please present this email and convey my concern at the Tuesday meeting, which I cannot attend, and please forward to the planning commission. Along with the demise of Fred Richards this proposal is a slap in the face. I see no benefit to the neighborhood south of 70th, indeed for anyone south of crosstown and east of 100. Thank you, Michael Ebnet 4501 Claremore Court Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: John Traul <johntraul @hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 10:42 PM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Subject: FW: Attractive Nuisance 7120 Mark Terrace Dr. From: iohntraul @hotmail.com To: tschmitz @edinamn.pov; dfisher @edinamn.eov; ibrown @edinamn.gov CC: ihoveland @edinamn.gov; mbrindle @edinamn.go aswenson @edinamn.sov, isprague@edinamn.gov; stephen.a.readv @gmail.com Subject: Attractive Nuisance 7120 Mark Terrace Dr. Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:33:35 -0500 Gentlemen, The Edina Police were at the house next door to me today, Sunday July 13, investigating a break -in, tresspasser /intruder living in the abandoned house at 7120 Mark Terrace Dr. The Edina Police officer said I should contact you regarding this property. It has been abandoned for 3+ years, the absentee land owner moved out of state. The exterior continues to deteriorate with crumbling, broken and loose plaster stucco. The front porch, rear deck etc. are deteriorating, broken and rotten. Window casings are rotting due to lack of paint /maintenance. Rear windows have been broken out and boarded up to keep people out of the house. Weeds lining the drive, in front of the house and in side yard are 2 to 5 ft. in height. Landscape timbers /retaining walls holding up the driveway and back yard are rotting. The asphalt drive is crumbling and has weeds growing in it. It is attracting non - neighborhood youth who have been on the roof of the dwelling. Pot busts have been made in front of this property since it has been abandoned. Not only is this property an attractive nuisance for those looking for a place for illegal activity, it is an environmental /health issue due to the unkept grounds, and is seriously eroding the property values of the other homes in the neighborhood. I have never seen another house in Edina that is in this state of disrepair. I can not tell you how many people, when passing by this property, will stop and ask "why isn't the city doing something about this ?" I am asking the City of Edina to inspect this property and use whatever codes are applicable to have the land owner bring this property up to the City of Edina code. Thank you. John Traul 7116 Mark Terrace Drive Edina, MN 55439 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Paul McElrath [mailto:pwmcelrath @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:12 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: NO to 72nd and France Rental) Retail Complex ! Dear Cary Teague: Now I am not one of those over reactionary type of people and] do like Edina to proper and increase our tax base, BUT Please Please Please do not let this monster of a housing complex be built on 72nd and France. I graduated from Edina and have 29.years as an adult invested in Edina, so I do have Edina history. Living in the area of this proposed complex, I know all to well how congested the area on France is getting. Now with the Byerly's housing complex going up and the fact 72nd is now a right turn on to France now, this area is just too crowded. So,:please don't let a few Mpls developers ruin OUR EDINA just to make them money. Please do not allow the City to amend Edina's comprehensive plan for this MONSTER. Please pass on my concerns to the City Counsel meeting this coming Tuesday. Thank You: Paul McElrath 4508 Gilford Drive Edina, MN 55435 - - - -- Original Message--- From: Manish Virmani lmailto-.manish virmani(caamail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:25 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re:,Concern regarding proposed development on 72nd St & France Ave An additional request - could you please present my email to the City Council on Tuesday, and forward a copy to the Planning Commission? I will attend the Council:Meeting on Tuesday as well. Thank you! On Jul 14, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Manish Virmani <manish.virmaniC3Dgmail.com> wrote: > Hello Mr. Teague: > d, > I recently found out about the proposed, development 'at the intersection of 72nd St. and France Ave., and I was really excited to hear about it. I elt that the.city was moving,in the,right direction with the development focus. However, as I learned more -about the details of the project, I found a few areas to be quite troubling: > 1. Housing density is too high for such a neighborhood. > 2. The traffic situation on 72nd Street is already becoming a challenge with no left turn allowed on France Ave, so everyone has to go through Lynmar Lane to Hazelton, which by the way is so congested because of everyone visiting the funeral home (Cremation Society of Minnesota) parking on the street. Any additional traffic will result in significant difficulty for all residents. > > 3. Consequential losses - Residents of this neighborhood such as ourselves selected to live in this area because of the quietness it offers. A significant increase in residential density will definitely result in reduced privacy, and consequently, home values. > 4. Appearance - With the Byerly's development as well as this proposed project,.the area is going to appear /become more "commercial" than it should be. > Given these factors, I would like to request that this project be altered to allow for reduced housing density and consequent impact. Thank you. > Sincerely, > Manish Virrriani > 7312 Glouchester Drive, > Edina, MN 55435 > Ph: 612 - 325 -4103 From: Anne Marie Plante [ mailto:poppvplantealomail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 5:46 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 72nd / France Avenue Rental Development Dear Mr, Teague: As a homeowner on west 70th Street, I am strongly opposed to the proposed apartment / commercial development on 72nd and France. The traffic volume on West 70th from Highway 100 to France is already back to pre- renovation levels. This decision; along with the already over -built Southdale area, is contributing to a radical, negative change in the character of this part of the city. To all appearances, there is collusion on a grand scale among the developers and`certain members of the City Council, since residents of the zone between France and Highway 100 have not been properly apprised of this latest development. This development would most especially impact a residential neighborhood with an elementary school on an already dangerous, overburdened thoroughfare. I look forward to your response to these concerns, and request that you present this messae to the City Council and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you, Anne Marie Plante 4801 West 70th Street From: Leo Sioris rmailto:lsiorisnsafetycall.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 6:43 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: opposition to development Dear Mr. Teague, I recently (only yesterday) learned of a new development proposed in my Cornelia neighborhood located at 72n, and France. My Wifd`and 1 are vehemently opposed to this development. It is totally inappropriate for our small Cornelia neighborhood.,,There is.no doubt it would add a bottle neck to traffic at that exit from our neighborhood, the only convenient one;onto France Ave, and it would increase traffic to`near by Cornelia elementary school to access Hwy 100, etc. This type of development'does not belong on that site. Furthermore, with all the other. high density building occurring along the France ave corridor, it has gotten very difficult to traverse France Ave today. I encourage you and the City Council<to put the Interests of our citizens and neighborhoods before that of developers. The sanctity of our neighborhoods and'schools needs to be preserved as does our overall quality of life in Edina. Please say no to this project or any like'it on that site, it'does not belong there. Thank you, Leo and Cheryl Sioris 7337 Oaklawn Ave So. PS, please present this email to the City Council for review Tuesday and forward a copy to the planning commission. Heather Braniain From Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:18 AM To: Deb Mangen; Heather Branigin Subject: FW: Rental /retail project at 72 & France I have been a homeowner on West Shore Drive for the past 30 years and have watched the the changes that have and are taking place in the Southdale area. We went through the change of 70th to attempt to return it to a city street and reduce traffic by imposing a 25 mph.speed limit. Than we introduce more traffic by adding more density with multiple housing units at Southdale and at Byerlys and now this proposed project which will add more density and traffic to an already over burdened France Avenue at the same time we are spending a ton of taxpayer money to make France Avenue more pedestrian friendly. Makes no sense to me! I would encourage the planning commission to reject this project for a less intrusive project. Regards, Larry Buechler Sent from my iPad 1 From: Wayne Vander Vort fmailto•wvandervortaisurtec.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:07 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: James Hovland; KStaunton(@EdinaMN.gov Subject: Opposition to 7200 France Avenue Project Importance: High Cary K. Teague, AICP „ Community Development Director City of`Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina; MN 55424 Cary: We are long term residents of Edina and live at the address listed below. We are sending you this e-mail in our written opposition to the proposed development at 7200 France Avenue, Edina, MN, which.proposes: ➢ 170 unit apartment (6 stories) ➢ 25 units of row housing (4 stories) ➢ 45,500 square. feet of rental space including two restaurants ➢ A two -level underground parking ramp In addition, we respectfully request denial of the following requests of the developer: ➢ Building Height -- -from 4 stories to 6 stories ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50 ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.41 We also request the Planning Commission and City Council oppose any rezoning of the subject property with respect to the PUD, Planned Unit Development requested by the developer.. our opposition is based upon many factors, including but' not limited to, the unreasonable and excessive density requests of the developer for this project and the obvious creation of additional traffic congestion on north and south lanes of France Avenue and 72 "d Street. Both France Avenue and 72nd Street are already over burden with current traffic, even without the Bylery's Project being completed. The completion and future occupancy of the -Bylery's Apartments will create the maximum "traffic count" for France Avenue. In our opinion there would be a serious and dangerous traffic safety issue with this proposed development and the requested right —in and right -out on France Avenue and full access off 72nd Street into the proposed Project with the new left turn lane off of North France,Avenue unto 72nd Street. It should be noted that many neighbors living in this area currently use 72nd Street' to access France Avenue. Furthermore, it is only reasonable to assume that tenants and users of this proposed development would access 72 "d Street and drive through our neighborhood to access 70th Street and Highway 100 thereby creating increased traffic within the neighborhood and thereby creating potentially dangerous conditions for the neighbors and students attending Cornelia School and'the multitude of activities on and about the playing fields on the Cornelia campus /fields, i.e. baseball activities, skating and hockey rinks, general playgrounds, et cetera. This.proposed project would have an adverse impact on our entire neighborhood and should be denied Respectfully submitted: Wayne and Nancy Wayne and Nancy Vander Vort 4525 Giford Drive Edina, MN 55435 wvandervorta- isurtec.com wvandervortC�comcast. net From:;Sarah Way f_mailto:sarahw&(@gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:31 AM To: Cary Teague; Subject: Proposal for 7200 France Ave Mr. Teague, I'd like to voice my distress regarding the potential 6 story building project at 7200 France Ave. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood and both of my children attend the elementary school which is only a few blocks from the proposed renovation. I fully support redeveloping that property in a method consistent with the surrounding neighborhood, but feel that the extremely large proposed rental /retail project is completely inappropriate for several reasons. It will add to the already congested traffic area of France Ave and will increase the traffic down 70th St. The elementary school is located right off of 70th and I already have a terribie'wait picking up the kids after work as there are incredibly Tong traffic backups on this (residential!) street during the after work rush hour. The street just can't handle any more traffic without becoming a larger road and really destroying the personality of the neighborhood. It will increase the "stranger danger" in the neighborhood which I view as a safety concern for the neighborhood kids and the elementary school. Right now the only people in the neighborhood are people who live there and have a vested interest in keeping it safe for our kids. With such a large rental/retail space right at the edge, many strangers will be passing (on foot, or by vehicle to avoid the congestion on 70th and France) through our residential streets and I'm distressed about what that means as my children are nearing the age where they ought to be able to bike to their friend's houses independently. We moved to the area because it was so family friendly, but with all the new construction in such a short time (Byerly's area, Fred Richards area, and now this project which doesn't even adhere to the city's comprehensive plan), it feeN like Edina is selling out the Cornelia neighborhood and isn't looking out for the best interests of those of us who live there. Please don't let this project move forward without drastically scaling back the proposal! Sarah Way 4705 Aspasia Circle From: Chris Rofidal (mailto:crofidal @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:35 AM To: James Hovland; jonibennettl2@comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); aoshsoraeue @edinarealtv.com: swensonannl @smail.com Cc: Cary Teague; Scott H. Neal Subject: Sketch Review 7200 France Mayor Hovland, Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson- I hope you will take deep look at the sketch plan for 7200 France and recognize that we need to slow down on creating more density in that area. There are so many projects underway on France that I would think it would be hard to have accurate traffic counts & density figures with so much under development. Further, the fact that the Comp Plan needs to be amended to accommodate this massive scale should tell you we are over building. I grew up within 2 blocks of that site and it causes me concern that'we are going to add more traffic into the Cornelia neighborhood. The roundabouts on 70th Street have greatly increased cut - through traffic already. I am for responsible re- dedelvopemt that minimizes the impact to the homes abutting this project. This project at first glance is way to large for that corner and needs to be scaled back. Please ask tough questions and give the developer some guidance on what we as community have agreed upon via the Comp Plan. We spent years developing the Comp Plan and we need to stop amending it every time to accommodate the "next project". Thanks for your time and service. Chris Rofidal 5037 West 56th Street Edina, MN 55436 From: Patty Tmailto•pastana68 @gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:36 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France projet Mr. Teague, I am writing to let you my concerns and opposition to the proposed project at 7200 France. The project is too big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood with the nearby Cornelia Elem school, and will add more traffic to the already crowded France Ave. Please listen to the residents and stop this project. Sincerely, Patty Stang From: Kathy Hurd fmailto :kathy.hurd @widowshope.orol Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:44 AM TO: Cary Teague Subject: Building on 72nd and France Dear Mr. Teague, I cannot tell you saddened I am that the city of Edina feels the need to have yet another rental/retail project within it's city,limits with affordable housing in it. At the present time we have construction join on at 3'major crossroads, in this area alone. I have just recently moved to Edina three years ago: France Avenue has had construction EVERY SINGLE YEAR since, I have been here. Now the city feels it needs to do this again. I chose to move to Edina because of the wonderful neighborhoods. They have people that have what I call "Pride of ownership." They maintain the property, they care about where they live and they area around it. The small neighborhoods within a neighborhood, the quaintness of them. The big trees and families living in the area for years. This will be taken away with yet another rental unit. My current home backs up against Cedars of Edina. No matter what you say there will be noise, mess and chaos from this structure. Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday mourning before 7 a.m. a tractor brings a train of waste bins over to the conner where my home sits. Then a couple of large dumpsters empty the train of bins that have been hauled over from another part of the property. After they have been emptied someone then comes and pulls them away and puts them all back. Please note I said before 7:00 a.m. Last summer I had a man that would sit in the corner by my home and drink all night and talk to himself, this year its the teenagers. That is just the noise, there is constantly garbage in my yard, and there is a fence and pine trees behind me. I was told when I moved in that the owner of the Cedars complex would work with us adding more trees to help with noise and mess. I'm still waiting for his return call.....oh yea I called him last year. As I am sitting here writing this letter it seems ironic to me that while I am opposing a developer that would allow him to build a complex that is two stories higher then code, have 50 units per acre, 20 more then code, and the floor area 1.41, up from 0.6, here I am in my wanting to make a deck SMALLER and have been told that I need to get a survey because they are not sure I am within my property lines. The surgery map I have that was signed by an employee for the city of Edina clearly shows I am within the guidelines. I have not touched on many of the other reason I feel that this project is not appropriate. The first being that there is already the Metro Blvd. Project that is touching this same neighborhood on the other side. With at least 10 different buildings that have. affordable housing, and now the new project will add more luxury. This area is already full of retail stores that are not being used, take,a look at Southdale. Lastly there is also many apartment units in the area that.have been sitting empty for a while. The Westin Project alone still has many condo's that are empty, and who wants to live in a new building in a unit and look at Southdale Mall across the parking lot? I still have not touched on the most important part of this project and that is the children that live in this area. We have families that care about each other and the children do play outside and go to the school yard and play baseball and hockey. If this project happens the integrity of our small town neighborhood feel goes with it That is what made Edina Edina and why people come to this city and want to raise their families here and why they bring their grandchildren to the 4th of July parade. It is not about more apartments and retail. How many more coffee shops and Chinese restaurants do we need. Trust me I LOVE Red Pepper. The builders can promise they will do everything ...... trust me as someone who has been told this by another owner it does not happen. Unfortunately I cannot attend your meeting tomorrow night as Tuesday is my night at work in the Galleria. For this reason I ask that you read this email to the leaders of your group. Thank you for your time. Kathy Hurd From: melinda emerson [mailto:melindaiemerson @ gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:45 AM To:, Cary Teague Subject: Development at 7200 France Dear Cary, I am contacting you to oppose the proposed development at 7200 France Ave. My family resides at 7124 Heathterton Trl and we, are very. concerned about the increased traffic that will result from a development this size., When we made the decision to purchase our house we did so because we noted the minimal traffic that is on 72nd street. We have two young boys (9 months and 3 years) and we value the quiet neighborhood. I'm also concerned about the increased traffic on France Avenue that this construction may cause. -We like to walk to Centennial Lakes, but the sidewalk configuration and traffic is already becoming a deterrent. The West side sidewalk of the block between 72nd Street and Gallagher is right next to the street. It is scary to walk with my children and dogs right next to cars zooming past at 40+ mph. This new development will only increase my concern with this part of the street. This development seems to counter the rest of the work being done to improve the street for pedestrians. Please forward my concerns to the Planning Commission and share it at the council meeting on Tuesday. Thank you, Melinda Emerson From: John Wright [mailto:jsw0710C & amall.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014`8:46 AM To: Cary Teague; Kayla Wright Subject: Development at 72nd and France This email is written in opposition to the apartment/condo development planned for the office building space at 72nd and France. This would g`r.eatly affect traffic flow in the neighborhood. Any.resident at the apartment complex,,potentially —200 with the proposed increase in size from theoriginal development pitched to the City Council, wanting to travel north: on: France would have to first drive east on 72nd, as there is no left turn option at 72nd and .France. Those wanti ng to get to Hwy 1'00 would then likely go to Cornelia Drive and then to 70th. This is right by Cornelia Elementary. I can't see how increasing traffic around an elementary school is good. Regards, John S Wright From: Emily Christie fmallto :emilym.christie(d)gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:41AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development at 72nd and France Dear Cary, I am a resident of the South Cornelia neighborhood, and we are directly impacted by.the proposed development at 72nd and France that will be considered at the next meeting. My family moved here with some small objections because of the office building in that location, but the idea that the proposed building would be so high in density, on a VERY challenging street for traffic already, exceed existing zoning for height, and right on a main access road for Cornelia school, all makes me concerned that the development of this space as proposed is not in the best interest of my children's safety. I am concerned that our neighborhood, which most people who are not from here know nothing about, will get increased scrutiny from people who are passing through. Having lived near the lakes in South Minneapolis, we were victim to repeated occurrences of petty crime, and that has thankfully been non - existent here. The developments of this kind, on York Avenue have significantly higher crime rates than Cornelia, Pm not impressed that the developer has thought this through very carefully. Many thanks for your consideration, Emily Christie 7316 Cornelia Dr. - -- Original Message= From: Ruth and Lewis Marshall [mailto:mars7101 @comcast.netl Sent:. Monday, July 14, 2014 8:56 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 72nd and France. Hi Mr Teague, I live at'7101 Cornelia Drive, across from Cornelia school. Yesterday I learned of a proposed building at 72nd and.France Ave. From what I see it i0nappropriate, for the neighborhood to bring that much more traffic here. France Ave is already. congested. I would guess quite a bit of traffic from that building would go West on 72ndId Cornelia Drive, and North, to 70th St., From.there the traffic would head west to Highway 100. This is a residential.neighborhoodwith an elementary school on Cornelia Drive. The neighborhood; the parents, of the children at Cornelia school, and I would be very displeased if this building and the increased traffic it would bring, were approved. Lewis and Ruth Marshall I From:. David J Melroe [mailto:dmelroeC@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:59 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave Apartment project Mr. Teague My wife Jane and myself David Melroe, 7120 West Shore Drive, are opposed to the proposed apartment project on 7200 France avenue. It will be another congested eyesore on a street that is already too congested. It will also subtract the peaceful quality from the established neighborhood that we live in. Sincerely David Melroe From: Sara Peyton [mailto•sara c.pg on gmail.corn Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014,9:15 AM To: Cary Teague Subject:, Six-story France Avenue rental /retail project Hello Cary, I am writing this email to let you know thatI am opposed to this project. It is too big for the space, is inappropriate for residential neighborhood, and will add too much traffic to an already overburdened France Avenue and.our neighborhood with its nearby elementary school. Our neighborhood will also be used as'a cut through to access Hwy 100 by anyone living in this new development (should it go through), as it is now only possible to exit our neighborhood onto France going South. In addition, I do not believe the: city of Edina is taking into account the many other high density housing building going up, and all will impact the streets and `stores. -Apts across from Westin (behind Southdale) -Apts going in where the old Byerly's is located - Condos, going in behind Cub foods -Now this newest proposal I believe the pedestrian friendly France Ave road changes being made currently were based on a 2009 road study. It is now 2014, and all empty retail spaces are full, a new Whole Foods, Home Goods, Starbucks, Trader Joe's along France Avenue all came into existence after this study. Lets not turn Cornelia neighborhood into one that is "undesirable" due to the overcrowding from additional high density living/apts. on the roads and in the shops. Please present my email to the Council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Regards, Sara Peyton 7208 Glouchester Drive Edina, MN 55435 (952) 913 -2479 From: A All Animal Control of Minneapolis /St. Paul rmailto :msp @aallanimalcontrol.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 20149:28 AM To,,: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed NHH Properties Development. Dear Community Development Director Teague, I was recently made aware of a proposed development for the corners of France Ave. & W 72nd St. in Edina. I am strongly opposed to this development as it's currently configured. The current configuration is.far to`dense and massive to be set immediately against and in a residential neighborhood. I am not against appropriate or practical development in Edina, but this is neither appropriate, nor practical for the area and neighborhoods adjacent to it. Please send this plan back to DJR Architecture, Boisclair Corp,and NHH Properties and request a significant lX scaled down and appropriately altered version for any development on this block(s). Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Scott Scott Buzby 7409 West Shore Dr. Edina, MN 55435: Scott,Buzby President . AAA Certified Wildlife Management Professional Professional Bat Excluders F] Certified Bird Control Specialists A All Animal Control of Minneapolis /St. Paul 612.7, 66.9215 MSPC�aallanimalcontrol.com www.aallanimalcontrol.com Heather Braniain From: dmlafontaine @comcast.net Sent:.. Monday, July 14,-2014 9:25 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West project Honorable Mayor and City Council I believe it's very important to help::youth get a good start in life. For this to happen they need stable housing and an education. We, f ave. many "programs for "at- risk" toddlers, help for elementary students Who are struggling or bit of homeless families. There is little available for homeless youth 99 9 p' once they're on. their own. This housing pro ect with the su ort dimension will of a longVay to helping homeless youth become, secure, productive adults. All the. resources and job opportunities in the area make the proposed location perfect. Please support this project.` Diane, LaFontaine 7250 York Ave S #207 Edina, MN 55435 St. Luke's Lutheran Church, Bloomington 1 Heather Braniain From: Teague Sent:. Monday, July 14, 2014 9:57 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: 7200 France Project Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952 - 826 -0460 i Fax 952-826-03891 Cell 952 -626 -0236 4801 W. 50th St. i Edina, MN 55424 Y cteaoue0- EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: George Rea Sr [mailto:aeorgereasrOcimail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:52 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Terri Rea; 13ulie Rea home Subject: 7200 France Project TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL Enough Density. Enough Traffic.This totally exceeds Edinas "comprehensive plan". Is our city council really entertainig this? Add this to the Southdale project and where do we stop? Please convey my concerns to them. People move here to join our schools! Between the 195 rentals with one or two cars each and 45,000 sf of retail,how many additional cars does that translate to? Drive down 70th street at rush hour - Bikers will pass you - France Ave is overburdened - How much is too much! See you at tomorrows meeting. Thanks George Rea 4400 Dunham Drive Edina 1 From: Christy Lukasewycz fmailto:christyluka (cbyahoo.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:45 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave rental /retail project Dear Mr Teague, My name is Christy Lukasewycz, I am an Edina resident in the Cornelia neighborhood. My husband and I have three children (two going to Cornelia elementary this year) and overall we have been quite happy with decision to move this area of Edina. One of my neighbors brought to my attention a massive apartment building project recently presented to the Edina Planning Commission. I have two concerns regarding this project: 1) The numbers are staggering; 195 rental units; 45,000 square feet, 25 row homes. 2 restaurants. This project is too big for the lot, and too big for the neighborhood. The France Ave corridor is already congested and much of the apartment building construction in the area is not even completed. 72nd and the adjoining side streets were never intended for such high housing density. Similarly, Cornelia elementary, is not prepared for such a massive expansion of the student base. 2) Lack of communication regarding City planning. I learned of this project only through discussions with my neighbors, who themselves learned of the project serendipitously. Like all my neighbors, I am heavily invested in Cornelia and I would expect that my city government would inform my neighbors and me in the planning stages of such a large and potentially neighborhood- changing project. Please present this letter to the City Council at the Tuesday, July 15th meeting and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Christy Lukasewycz 4428 Gilford Drive Edina, MN 55435 763 - 229 -7192 From: Carly. Broderick [ mailto :Carly.Broderick @target.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:25 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Carly.Broderick Subject: I'm concerned about the France Ave /72nd St proposal Dear Cary — I recently read about the proposal for replacing a France Ave /72nd St office building with a large apartment and retail complex. The proposal is wrong for Edina — it's FAR too big for the space, inappropriate to place so close to a residential neighborhood (especially with the work happening over at Fred Richards golf course and Pentagon Park, on the other side of the neighborhood), will add far too much traffic to an already overburdened France Ave — and our neighborhood, including Cornelia Elementary School. Please plan to present my email — and concerns —to the City Council tomorrow, Tuesday, July 15th. I'd also appreciate you forwarding my email on to the Planning Commission. This project absolutely cannot proceed in the manner being proposed. It is the wrong thing to do for the surrounding residential neighborhoods. I trust you and others on the Council will take my concerns seriously as a resident. Sincerely, Carly Broderick 4405 Ellsworth Drive, Edina Carly Broderick Director I Toys and Sporting Goods I OTarget 1 1000 Nicollet Mall TPS 2452 1 Minneapolis, MN 55403 1611696.8453 (ph) — Original Message — From: Rickluther [mailto:rickluther @ aol.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:17 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Mr. Teague: I believe that the development being proposed for 7200 France Ave. is much too large for the area and will present a serious traffic and density problem. Please ask the planning commission to deny this project. Thank you. R.K. Luther Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:58 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject FW: France Avenue Project Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina; MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I' Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteague@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.Rov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families& Doing Business - = - -- Original Message--- - From: Jame's Hield [mailto:idhield @gmail:com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:44 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Avenue Project Cary, I am contacting you to express concern for the proposed commercial development at the corner of France Ave and 72nd St. I would like to add my voice to those who see this new development as too large for the area, which is already a very high traffic and congested zone. I support continued smart commercial development in Edina and think that the city has done a pretty good job over the years balancing the needs of businesses and neighborhoods. However, the area around Southdale and south on France to Hwy 494 is fast becoming over -built in my opinion. I live near 70th and Hwy 100 and just running simple errands to this area has become more of a chore, even without.the . current construction. Falso think projects of this scale;and height change the character of the community; you just need to look at downtown Wayzata and see what a major change the new Presbyterian Homes complex has done to the east end of that community. This is a good example of overbuilding, and I hope the City Council will require the developers to go back and re -think this project so the scale is appropriate given the level of activity that already exists around France and 72nd. Thank you for conveying my thoughts at the July 15 City Council meeting. Jim Hield 1 Heather Braniain From: Wayne Vander Vort <wvandervort@isurtec.com> Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 10:03 AM To: Ann Kattreh cc:. James Hovland Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Ann: You have undoubtedly read or heard (see below) that two: Minneapolis Golf Courses, i.e. Hiawatha and Meadowbrook have been closed for the balance of 2014 and perhaps a good portion of 2015 if re- seeding is required. The unfortunate damage and flooding to Hiawatha and Meadowbrook presents a great marketing opportunity of attracting many of these golfers to use Fred Richards.,and Braemar for the balance of. FY 2014 and FY.2015. With minimum effort, a reasonable :percentage of these new users to FR and Braemancould be retained as.future regular golfers at FR and Braemar, i.e. leagues, youth programs, seniors, regular players, and thereby be a financial benefit. These events present an opportunity for reconsideration by the Park and Rec Department and City Council keeping FR open for FY 2015 season. I. respectfully request your consideration as well as the City Council. Wayne Wayne Vander Vort 4525 Gilford Drive Edina, MN 55435 Email: wva ndervort(cD-com cast. net Email: wvandervort(aD-isurtec.com MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Minnesota continues to wrestle with the damage -being caused by flood waters. And that includes some popular Minneapolis Park Board golf courses. Two of those courses. remain closed and unplayable. The Hiawatha Golf Course and Meadowbrook Golf Course have been inundated by the overflowing Minnehaha Creek. "It was - raining so hard that you just couldn't imagine, and we knew that dike was not going to be able to hold it out there," said Paul Schmidt, of Meadowbrook. 1 On a Thursday that should be brimming with golfers, Schmidt drives the only cart on the course. He's been taking calls since last week, when Meadowbrook was overrun by flood waters. People are looking for tee times, and he's telling them to wait until August. There's so much water on the course, it's tough to get from hole to hole: Crews are using a rowboat in some places. Course superintendent Scott Nelson says it won't get better until the swollen Minnehaha Creek recedes. "The timetable is up in the air," Nelson said, "but the old saying is we're going day by day, and that's exactly what we're doing." Over at the flooded Hiawatha course, some practice areas remain open. But tournaments and leagues are being moved to other courses, if they can find room. "They're disappointed, but they're very understanding," said Dan Stoneburg, the course manager, "and we're hopeful we can get back to where we were, before it flooded out." Yet even when the water goes, damage will remain. And if the water wanes too much, it would cook and kill the grass.. . "It's a beautiful course, beautifully laid out," Stoneburg said, "but to see it go to hell like this, pardon my French, but it's gone." The closure is costing both courses thousands of dollars in revenue each day. The courses are also still paying crews to maintain the greens and fairways that are still dry. Three other park board courses are completely re- opened: Wirth, Gross and Columbia. MINNEAPOLIS — Two Minneapolis golf courses will likely not open. for the remainder of the season. "It's . pretty sad," admits Sara Ackmann, Director of Golf for Minneapolis Park and Recreation. "You want to hear golfers, but it's just quiet right now." Both Meadowbrook Golf Course and Hiawatha Golf Course continue dealing, with flood damage and standing water after historic June rains. The two courses r neighbor the swollen Minnehaha :Creek.. "If the whole season `is a wash between the two courses, we're looking at $900 to $1 million losses in .revenue alone," says Ackmann. It means the term 'in the hole' has a darker definition. "We will have to shift funds around, ",she says. "We are also putting together estimates for FEMA." How much damage there . is remains a mystery. at Meadowbrook as floodwaters refuse to recede. City officials say it could- be two to three more weeks. The city's, three other courses, Wirth, Gross,'and Columbia, remain open. 'We hope people utilize them," says Ackmann. 'We hope to reseed as soon as possible and start preparing for next year." Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 10:33 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: 72nd and France Ave. proposed development Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteaeue@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - -- Original Message---- - From: David /Karen Carlson Imailto:kcarl @iphouse.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:07 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Josh Sprague; lonibenettl2tMcomcast.net Subject: 72nd and France Ave. proposed development Dear Mr. Teague: We are 40 plus year residents of the Cornelia neighborhood in Edina. While we have viewed the increasing high density housing in the Southdale and France Avenue areas with some anxiety, the developments to date have shown an appropriate level of scale for their site. In marked contrast, the proposed development at France and 72nd street truly overwhelms a relatively small space, creating an absolute monstrosity. Additionally, the sketch we've seen shows the development encroaching on single family residences. Further, from the illustration, it appears that traffic congestion in this vicinity would be increased further, with particular concern for W. 72nd street (which is a neighborhood street). Accessing south -bound France Avenue from 72nd Street at present can be something of a challenge at times. This development in its present form is totally inappropriate and unacceptable for this neighborhood. It needs to be scaled back, way - way- way back before it should be even considered. A great deal of discussion, time and effort was expended a few years ago in creating the Edina comprehensive plan. To have to amend this plan every time a new developer comes along just seems like hypocrisy. We expect more from our city leaders and planners. Listen up! Please forward a copy of this e-mail to the council members not included in this e-mail, and to members of the Planning Commission. Thank you. David and Karen Carlson 4713 Aspasia Circle Edina, MN 55435 Heather Braniain From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14,2014.10:33 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: France Ave rental /retail project Cary Teague, Community Development Director. 4801 W. 50th St. -1 Edina, MN 55424 952= 826 -0460 1 Fax 952426 -03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteaeue@EdinaMN.sov www.EdinaMNgov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Valerie Eckstein [mailto:vaierie eckstein@yahoo.coml Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 10:16 AM To: Cary Teague. Subject: France Ave rental /retail project Mr. Teague, This project Is too.big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood and will add too much traffic to an already overburdened'France"Avenue. Cornelia Elementary is'our neighborhood school and we firmly object to the project's close proximity to the school. Please DO NOT allow a project of this size and scale. Thank you, Valerie Eckstein 7213 Monardo Lane 1 Heather. Braniciin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014,10;34 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: 7200 France Avenue Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina,.MN 55424 952 - 826 - 0460.1 .Fax 952= 826 -03891 Cell 952 =826 70236 cteaeue EdinaMN.kov I www.EdinaMN.g,ov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - -- Original Message--- - From: Laura Berzinski [mailto:berzinski @comcast.netl Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:33 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Avenue Dear Mr. Teaque: Asa resident of the Cornelia area, I am concerned over the proposed development at 7200 France Ave. This proposed six story development is not in keeping with the City's comprehensive plan and is massive for the existing space. It would add too much traffic to the already congested France Avenue. Traffic would also be added to 70th Street which backs up several times a day and to Cornelia Drive past the elementary school. I am also concerned about neighboring residents. This development would infringe upon their privacy and views, would leave them feeing boxed in by buildings, and would add noise,and restaurant smells. This development is just too big for the space and is not appropriate for an existing residential neighborhood. Please do make allowances to existing city codes for this development. Thank you for your time, Laura Berzinski 7416 Kellogg Ave. 1 Heather. Branigin.. From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 10 :34 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Building project �.., Cary Teague, Community Development Director dQ s 952 - 828- 04601,Fax '952-826-0389 I Cell 952 - 826 -0238 4861 w. 50th st I Edina, MN 55424 deaoueO- EdinaMN.00v I www.EdinaMN.aov/Plannin.q ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Sophie Stoneking fmailto :sophiestoneking@amail.com� Sent: Monday, July 14,"2014 10:33 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: Building project Hi my name is Sophie Stoneking, I moved here from NY about 2 years ago and my husband grew up in Edina Cornelia neighborhood. We have three children. Two attending Cornelia elementary. I recently heard about the massive building projects being presented to the Edina Planning Commission and I am concerned if it is passed: 1. Though the city feel and the convenience is what I love about Cornelia neighborhood it is -also the balance of houses and suburban feel. To build such a massive building visible tahomes in that neighborhood destroys this balance. 2. There are way too many apartment building construction projects already in the area. Many not even completed. Vacant apartments may not be good for the neighborhood but filled apartments just means . overcrowding: Our elementary school is not prepared for this. Is the future of Cornelia Edina to become a haven for apartment buildings whilst other Edina neighborhoods get built up with beautiful homes and quiet streets? I love Cornelia. I love the fact that. it's a convenient and growing neighborhood but not an overcrowded neighborhood consumed by massive apartment buildings. Please keep a balance and present this letter to the City Council at the Tuesday, July 15th meeting and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Yours Truly, Pat and Sophie Stoneking, Esq. 6628 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 612 - 226 -6955 Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July_ 14, 201410:34 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: 72nd and France Proposal Cary Teague, Community Development Director ,• ;�'a 952- 826 -0460 I Fax 952- 826 -03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 4801 W: 50tii st. I Edina, MN 55424' s yam. cieaaueAEdinaMN.aov l www EdinaMN.aov/Plannina ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business. From: 1Mary Ellen Chamberlain fmailto •maryellenchamberlain @gmail.com1 Sent: Monday, July °14; 2014 10:31 AM To:_,,Cary Teague Subject: 72nd and France Proposal Dear Mr. Teague, As a 26 year resident of the Cornelia neighborhood, I am stunned that the city would even consider such a proposal for this property. We need to be PROTECTING this neighborhood, not bring in cut - through traffic, Anyone'who lives here knows that cars would avoid France Avenue, and going west would cut through the neighborhood streets. We have an elementary SCHOOL with lots of children WALKING. I work as a Substitute teacher for Edina,and know this reality. Please work FOR US, and not some developer. This project is not acceptable. I look forward to seeing how the city works to protect its residents best interests. Sincerely, Mary Ellen Chamberlain 7004 Bristol Blvd. Edina 55435 1 Heather Braniain From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 10:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Regarding Six -Story France Avenue rental /retail project surfaces in Edina ,p`�1DCary Teague, Community�Development Director Jq. 952- 826 -04601 Fax 952 -826 -03891 Cell 952 -826 -0236 4801 W. 50th-St. I Edina, MN'55424 5 cteaoue(ZDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov /Planning For Living, Learning, Raising Families& Doing Business From: Segundina Canilla rmailto:segundinac @yahoo.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:27 AM To:_ Cary Teague Subject: Regarding Six -Story France Avenue rentaVretail project surfaces in Edina Good morning. We got a copy about the above project. We are one of the Edina residents that agree that this project is too big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood and will add too much traffic to the already overburdened France Avenue and our neighborhood with its nearby elementary.school. ,In our opinion, the France Avenue road repairs have only been doing patches for years now, and the traffic will make_ the road worse. Also, in our opinion, it will change the safe feeling in the neighborhood. It opens up and will over burden the population in the neighborhood as well as that of the neighborhood elementary school. Thank you. From concerned Edina Residents. I From: Harvey Turner fmailto:hlt2nd @gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:35 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: OPPOSITION TO: Sketch Plan for contemplated project at 7200 France Ave. Dear Mr. Teague: It is my professional recommendation that there is absolutely no reason for the City of Edina to amend its Comprehensive Plan or significantly alter the existing floor area ratio (FAR) regulating use of the property at 7200 France Ave. For this particular; parcel, the Plan as it is currently written is spot on. I offer. my recommendation bas ed on the following conclusions:' 1. IT IS 'IMPERATIVE TO: PROTECT THE NEIGHBORHOODS: The HIGH QUALITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS of different price ranges and the people who choose to ,live m, :Edina beget our outstanding schools. In turn, these two facilitate demand for the remaining development (office, retail, service uses such as health care, etc.) and ensure that these uses will also be of high quality. By protecting the residential neighborhoods, the City can be assured that single and low density multifamily housing will remain viable and that the strong tax base they provide will self regenerate over time. 2. NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON TO EVER GROSSLY OVERBUILD A SITE: There are and will always continue to be a plethora of redevelopment opportunities in the City of Edina that will, if executed properly, refresh the city and enhance its tax base. The quality and the character of Edina need not be prostituted by approving a contemplated project that is too tall or too dense for the site. The amount of development the City can absorb is not unlimited from either a market and/ora functional perspective. The Comprehensive (Master) Plan and supporting, studies (economic and traffic for example) are suppose to recognize this fact and "regulate" accordingly. 3. INDIVIDUAL INTEREST vs. THAT OF THE COMMUNITY: The City has a statutory responsibility to be objective when weighing the interest of individuals one against another or a particular individual's interest against that of the greater good of the community. Regarding the property at 7200 France, I can think of several larger parcels in close proximity that are or shortly will be candidates for redevelopment (the Macy's site, Brandon Square, Yorktown Mall); and each of these can better and more appropriately accommodate higher density. The City should never be complicit and make a development mistake when either an owner over prices a piece property and/or a developer attempts to maximize profits by overbuilding. I want to thank you again for the opportunity to sit and talk with you from an urban design perspective about the existing situation and the redevelopment potential along the west side of France from 69th to 76th Street. Since our talk last week I have taken the time to drive and on two separate occasions park and observe the area. I am resolute with my opinion: that the eastern gateway to the Cornelia Neighborhood (72nd Street) must be protected; and that south of Gallagher Dr. the height of future buildings (all currently 4 stories or less) and therefore the density of development can be increased slightly. I would still not recommend introducing retail on the west side of the street. The entrance /exit requirements for the number of trips retail uses need to generate to be successful will undoubtedly lower the level of service at existing intersections; plus, each additional curb cut is in affect a partial intersection and will further impede traffic flow. There will be other opportunities for enhanced retail between France and York/Xerxes that will have less of a direct impact on traffic. Per your directions, I am submitting this e-mail so that you can print copies and put it before the Mayor and members of the City Council at their upcoming meeting this Tuesday. Please remember that I will always be willing to assist, as I have in the past, in whatever investigative and/or advisory capacity the City might deem appropriate. Edina is a wonderful place to reside and, like you, I want it to continue to be the best it can be. Respectfully yours, Harvey L. Turner Director of Planning and Campus Development, Retired University of Minnesota Resident: 7315 Glouchester Drive Edina MN. 55435 (952) 835 -9755 From: Kristi Nasby [ma i Ito: knasby@comcast. net ] Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:37 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six -story project Cary, It was recently seen in Minneapolis /St.Paul Business Journal a rental /retail project that is be proposed on France and 72nd street. I'm am VERY opposed to this project and believe it is ridiculous that it is even being considered in Edina. This City council needs to start looking at the best interest of its residents and neighbors who have been in this area for many many years and not these continuous developers who want to make money. This proposed project is ridiculous and should have no consideration. This is way too large of a project for this area in addition to inappropriate for this neighborhood. France Avenue is already overburdened with its traffic and the Byerly's living sight and the one on the Southeast corner of Southdale are not even involved yet! I don't believe an accurate traffic study has been done when these projects have been considered or approved. Our traffic in this area is getting out of hand. Please turn down this proposal and side with us neighbors for once! Thank you, Kristi Nasby 7408 West Shore Drive Sent from my iPhone From: Jean Mills fmailto: Mean mn@gmail.corn Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:37 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: proposed project on 72nd and France Dear Mr. Teague, We live close to the proposed new retail/rental project on 72nd and France. Does Edina REALLY need a project this size in this space? This abuts residential areas that obviously would be affected adversely, by this development. It's already difficult to walk and bike in the area, and this certainly wouldn.'.t make it any more friendly. And as for more' luxury" apartments in the area, hasn't the city encroached on enough space from the "regular" people to provide luxury living? Where in Edina can middle class people live ?. I would be interested in knowing what "affordable, housing" means. Where in the city can the people who work in all the retail and service jobs live? Please do not push through another ugly, huge, building in a city that values home ownership and green space. Thank you. Jean Mills 612 - 986 -8217 - - -- Original Message--- - From: Connelly [ mailto:connellyi @earthlink.netl Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:51 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Planned development for France Avenue and 72nd' Hello Cary, This is John Connelly, 7309 West Shore Drive, Edina, MN. I'was informed about a development being proposed by Boisclair Corp. for the site'above. •- o Although I am not aware of all the details related.to this project, I am concerned about the density and redevelopment plan for the land. It appears that there is a high concentration:of rental involved which would impact the area in many ways. It also appears that would involve amending a comp plan for the it and surrounding area. i would like to hear about the compelling reasons for this project being approved that would involve the areas of: traffic, property taxes, zoning, school, and residual value to the surrounding businesses. Thanks. John Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014:10:53 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject:, FW: Proposed 7200 France Avenue Project Attachments: edina 071414,pdf Cary Teague, Community Development Director r� 952- 826 -04601 Fax 952- 826 -0389 1 Cell 952- 826 -0236 ' 0 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 cteague(cDEdlnaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning :..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Robert Kellermeier [ malito :rkellermeier(abhotmall.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:53 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed 7200 France Avenue Project. Mr. Teague: Please see attached letter Robert A. Kellermeier Attorney at Law Kellermeier Law, P.A. 3800 American Blvd. W. Northland Plaza Suite 1500 Bloomington; MN 55431 Phone: 952 - 820 -1155 Fax: 952- 921 -5801 IMPORTANT: This transmission from the law firm of Kellermeier Law, P.A. ( "Kellermeier Law ") may contain information which is privileged, confidential and protected by the attorney- client or attorney work product privileges. Any content including documents, attachments, links or other writings are for the sole use of.the intended recipient, and other use is prohibited without express written approval by Kellermeier Law. If you are not the addressee, or if you have received this transmission in error, note that'any use of this information, including but not limited to disclosure, copying, reading, distribution, dissemination, transmittal, or re- transmittal is prohibited, and may be a violation of law under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510 -2521. Please destroy the information and notify Kellermeier Law immediately at our telephone number (952) 820 -1155. Robert & Janice Kellermeier 7201 Glouchester Drive Edina, MN 55435 _..................... .... ... July 14, 2014 City of Edina Attn: Cary K. Teague Community Development Director cteaeue@edinamn.gov RE: Proposed 7200 France Avenue Project Dear Mr. Teague: We have been residents of Edina for the past 18 years residing at 7201 Glouchester Drive which . is about 4 blocks from the proposed 7200 France Avenue Project. From the limited information that we have about the proposed project we adamantly oppose the project. It is our understanding that the proposed project requires at least three amendments .to the Edina Comprehensive Plan. The homes In this area and the owner of 7200 France are governed by and rely on the City Comprehensive Plan and all other zoning. and city restrictions. This project should not be allowed to circumvent these restrictions to the detriment of, the residential neighborhood. This project is too.large for our neighborhood which is already stressed with traffic especially on 72nd Street. Many cars traveling to the retail and office areas on France Avenue cut through our neighborhood as there are very few access roads. Adding a huge project like this would dramatically and negatively impact our neighborhood. Please reject this project. Thank you. Sincerel Robert & Janice Kellermeler From:, Steve Eastman fmailto :eric- eastmanabethei.edu1 Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:49 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Avenue Project Hi Mr. Teague, We were just informed that there is a proposal to put up a six story rental right off of France Avenue near the Cornelia neighborhood. I'm sending this email in hopes that our voices can be heard. There are already multiple apartment complexes going up in the area and France Avenue is already way too, overcrowded. We pay a premium to live in Edina and putting up large apartment complexes with affordable housing will only increase congestion and decrease the living standards for our area. We have a young family, live directly across from Cornelia elementary school and enjoy our neighborhood but projects like these will increase the likelihood that we will move out of the Cornelia area in the near future. Thank you for your consideration in this matter and please forward a copy of this email to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Steve Eastman 7117 Cornelia Drive Heather Braniciin From: Robert Leslie <quokka.leslie @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:57 AM To:: Edina Mail Subject:. Planned construction at 7200 France, Edina. On July 9th there was a Planning Commission meeting, open to the public, to discuss a proposed multi-use building at 720 France Ave. Unfortunately, I have been out of the state and was unable to attend the meeting. Iwo . uld however appreciate the opportunity to express my opinion about the proposed building. I have no objection to the building being built to the current Edina comprehensive plan. I strongly object though to the proposed amendments.. Other developers have managed I to, profit while staying within the current plan and I 'am certain these developers also have a fall back plan if they are denied the requested changes to the .city's current plan. France is rapidly becoming an over developed thoroughfare wWconsiderable traffic congestion. This "can only become worse if developers find that they can increase the density on their building plans. My comment is let the developers build, but only if they build within the city's current comprehensive plan. Robert H. Leslie 7309 Glouchester Drive, Edina, Minnesota 55435 Ph. 952 893 1868. E. Quokka.Leslie@gmail.com i - -- Original Message---- - From: Bernadette Daly [mal Ito: bndaly60Cawahoo.coml Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 10:58 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Avenue project Dear Mr.Teague, The six -story France Avenue rental /retail project proposed for the corner of France and 72nd street is.- too massive for the space and unsuitable for the neighborhood. It will add too much traffic to an already busy France Avenue and will cause a huge problem:in the traffic flow of 72nd street. A friend who resides in Bristol Circle, who does not have access to a computer, is very concerned about the immensity of the proposed project and how it will impact her property which is directly behind this site. I am writing this partly on her behalf and also because I live in the neighborhood. Luse 72nd street virtually every day for access to France Avenue. May I ask you to present my email to the council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Bernadette Daly. 4521 Sed u m Lane. Edina. MN 55435. Heather Braniqin From: Cary Teague , Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 11:12 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: 7200 France Ave. So. Property Attachments: 7200France:pdf Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952- 826 -04601 Fax 952- 826 -03691 Cell 952 - 826 -M6 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina „MN 55424 cteague CM-EdinaMN.govIwww.EdinaMN.gov /Planning a ...For Living, Learning, Raising FamMes & Doing Business From: RogerToyGuy aol.com (mailto:RogerToyGuy aol.com] Sent:. Monday, July 14, 2014 11:04 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: joshspr6guEi@edinarealty.com Subject: 7200 France Ave. So. Properly Cary Teague Attached is the flier what was left on our front door last night. This is the first time we have heard of this proposal. We have lived at 7129 Cornelia Drive:for 48 years. When we moved in the Site of the proposed development at 72nd & France was a sandpit. Then the present Office Bldg. was built. This proposed development is too massive for the neighborhood and will affect our property values, increase the already busy traffic flow down Cornelia Drive past Cornelia School, etc. WE ARE AGAINST IT !!I!! Pat & Roger Harmon 7129 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN '55435 Tel: 952 - 926 -9500 1 Urgent Notice! ! ! The plan below has already been presented to the Edina Planning Commission at their June 25, 2014 meeting, and received an encouraging response. Now the developer is planning to present this sketch plan to the City Council next Tuesday, July 15. Note the massive density of this project and how far it exceeds the City's Comprehensive Plan! • It! I s critical that we contact the City. by Monday July 14. Emails can be sent to Cary K Teague, AICP, Community Development Director; at cteaaugftdinamn.gov; Let :him know that this project is too big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood, and will add too much traffic to an already overburdened France Avenue and our neighborhood with its nearby elementary school. Ask Mr. Teague to present your emall to the Council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. He needs to hear from 100 of us by Monday afternoon. • Plan to attend the Council Meeting on Tuesday, July 1$ at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. We may not have the opportunity to speak at this meeting, however, our presence will be critical to let the Council know that ,we'do not want this type of massive complex in our residential neighborhood. We need at least 100 people to attend this meetingl Our City Council should be looking out for the best, interests of its residents and neighborhoods; not an overzealous developer! Six -story France Avenue rental/retail project surfaces in Edina Minneapolis / St Paul Business Joumal- Jun 25,. 2014, 2:46pm CDT 45 A partnership of DJR Architecture, Boisclair Corp. and NHH Properties has proposed replacing a France Avenue office building with an apartment and retail project.. The mixed -use development would have 195 rental units and 45,000 square feet of retail on the 3.9 acre site at 7200 France Ave. The Edina Planning Commission will discuss the proposal Wednesday night. Click here to see the agenda and download the plan. The six -story complex would have 170 luxury apartments, 25 row homes, two levels of underground parking, two restaurants and a courtyard, according to the;city's summary. Affordable- housing would make up 20 percent of the units, The Planning Commission will hold a. "sketch plan review" of the project and give feedback on the plan in the first step in the city's development-process, The city would need to amend its comprehensive plan to allow the six -story building (up from the current four- stories allowed), the housing density of 50 units per acre (up from 30) and the floor area ratio to 1.41 (up from 0.5 allowed on the site today). The ownership group identified in the city's summary of the project are Lori Boisclair of Minneapolis -based Boisclair Corp., Adam Seraphine of Minneapolis -based NHH Properties and Dean Dovolis of Minneapolis -based DJR Architecture. Sam Black, senior reporter, covers real estate, manufacturing and economic development. - - -- Original Message-- - From: Melody Sledz [mailto:melodVsledz @smail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 201411:05 AM to: Cary Teague Subject:'6 -Story rental /retail project in residential Edina,- 72nd and France Ave We.residents of the Cornelia area of .Edina are shocked and appalled.at the, massive rental project under consideratiomat 72nd and France Ave in our very residential neighborhood! These plans are, much too big for the space and zoning laws, extremely inappropriate for.our elementary- school neighborhood, and much too taxing for an already overburdened France Avenue. It's enough that we're already losing our wonderful neighborhood golf course to development and seeing huge rental,overbuilding of the Southdale/ Galleria/ Byerly's areas near us. This is getting crazy! And slightly ironic, in light of the Edina Council's concern with current tear down/ build up housing mentalities. If more rentals are really, truly needed, what about expanding or building on existing Parklawn Avenue, in what is already a rental area? Please look out for your own Edina neighborhoods' interests instead of the pressure of an overzealous developer. Thank you! Melody Sledz, 7321 Cornelia Drive k From: Sheri Kalb rmailto:sherikalb(&grnaiLcoml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:15 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development of France Ave /72nd We are opposed to the proposed six -story rental/retail project for the corner of France Ave and 72nd. This project is too physically overwhelming for the space, it is inappropriate for.our residential neighborhood, it will-overburden-an already overburdened France Avenue, it is too dense and will bring too much traffic to the Cornelia Elementary School neighborhood, and it is just not the right fit for that location. Moreover, it far-exceeds the City's Comprehensive Plan. We are dismayed at and frustrated,by. the chaos and congestion brought on already by the recent projects in the France Avenue /Southdale area. This new project as proposed is not beneficial to this area. It would need to be scaled back at least 50% to be considered at any point logical for the space. ` We are urging you to bring our concerns to the City Council on Tuesday, July 15 as well as forwarding this email 'on to the Planning Commission before Wednesday's meeting. Thank you for considering our concerns and representing us as our Community Development Director. Sheri and Bill Kalb 4.425 Gilford Drive 952- 929 -5182 From: Jeff Jonswold f mailto•jjonswold(&btodev.com1 Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:15 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Avenue Mr. Teague, I am a home owner at 7320 Cornelia Drive and I am contacting you regarding the proposed development at 7200 France Avenue. If the concept drawing I saw is what the City is considering I am in strong opposition to this development. A six story mixed use project is way beyond the scope of an acceptable development for this site. I recognize that the existing improvements on the site are an under- development but a development of 195 rental units and 45,000 square feet of retail is not, in my opinion, an acceptable option for this site. The traffic that a re- development of this site is going to generate is going to have the potential to dramatically impact the traffic flow and intensity around Cornelia School. Many vehicles coming down 70th Street already bypass the France /7& Street intersection by diverting past the school to 72nd Street and a residential /retail project of the scale proposed will only increase this pattern. The City cannot ignore the children for the benefit of the developer. If I am not mistaken, the recent enhancements /changes on 70"' Street were intended to improve the safety considerations of the children in the neighborhood and those using the school grounds and park. This proposed development seems to fly in the face of the reason for making these improvements /changes to 70"' Street. . I am quite surprised that the City would allow a project of this size to even get to this point of being under consideration. In my opinion, if the City officials are doing their jobs and balancing the needs of new development with neighborhoods interests, they should have clearly informed the developer at the very beginning that a project of this size was not appropriate for this site. If I understand other recent housing projects approved by the City they did not come close to requiring the amendments /variances that this proposal will need. I don't believe there was any requirement for retail at the Sherman project at the Southdale Mall where retail would seem to make much more sense. The Byerly's site only has 32,000 square feet of retail with 234 rental units (138 SF /unit), yet the City will still consider allowing 45,000 square feet of new retail to a site proposed for 195 new units (230 SF /unit) that backs up to a residential neighborhood. I understand the City allowing taller buildings at Southdale Mail and on the Byerly's site (the east side of France) but it seems to me that as you transition across France Avenue towards the residential neighborhoods that maintaining the City's four story limit should be maintained. Thank you for accepting my comments and concerns and please count me, and my wife, as being strongly opposed to the new development as proposed for the site at 7200 France Avenue. Heather Branigin From: Robert Leslie <quokka.leslie @gmail com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 201411:22 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed 6 story rental /retail project at 7200 France Ave, I was unable to attend the public planning meeting, on July 9th, to discuss the proposed multi -use building at 7200 France, because I was out of the state. I am not opposed to construction on that site, but I believe it should be kept within the. current City Comprehensive Plan. Other developers on France have managed to stay within the 4 floor limit and housing density of 50 units per acre. I see no. reason for this to be varied. Increasing the allowed density on France, for one developer, would open the flood gates to further dense development, and France which is becoming a traffic nightmare could only become much worse. Thank you. Yvonne Leslie 7309 Glouchester Drive, Edina, Minnesota 55435 Ph. 952 893 1868. E. Quokka.Leslie@gmail.com 1 From: Pat Swanson fmailto_pswansoni comcast.netl Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:21 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Retail /Rental development at 72nd and France Dear Mr Teague, I am very concerned about the proposed rental/retail building in the area at France Avenue and 72nd St. It seems way to large for the space. That area is already congested with traffic and the proposed development would increase that. I live on Heatherton Trail and people already cut through the neighborhoods and near the school to avoid the intersection at France and 70th. We just can't have this keep spilling into the neighborhoods. We are supposedly working on France Ave this summer to make it more convenient and more safe for walkers in the area. A busy retail /rental development is not going to help the safety factor. Please present this to the Council and also forward a copy to the Planning Commission. I plan to attend the meeting on Tuesday to show my support against this development. Thank you, Pat Swanson From: TC- Teasdale,: Nancy [mailto: Nancy .TC- Teasdale(dotsuka- us.coml Sent: Monday, July 14;2014 11:21 `AM To: Cary Teague _ Subject: Sic story France Ave Rental /retail project Dear Cary: I see there is a proposal to, put up a six story retail /rental project at the corner of 72 "d and France Ave, adding 195 more rental units, 45;000 square feet of retail and density to.an already overbuilt corner with the Byerly's and other redevelopment projects ongoing:. First, why would Edina be interested in starting to look like the awful.Eden Prairie area where they have built these monstrosities of buildings directly on top of the road so you feel like you are in a tunnel and secondly, why.do we want to add all of that density along with the already known additional density that will be created when all of the project below are completed: • New apartments /retail at the Byerly's location • New apartment /retails at the Southdale shopping center • New apartments /retail at the old Wickes location • New Fred Richards development hotel /retail /apartments • And who knows where else there are "plans" we aren't aware of ? ?? In addition, there already is a supposed need to have a more pedestrian friendly France Ave, now the plans to squeeze in a huge new complex with 100's of more cars, that doesn't meet the current building requirements of the city, it just doesn't make sense tome. With the narrowing of the France Ave road in this area, adding more traffic to France and 72 "d, it seems like a disaster waiting to happen. Where is the.consideration for safety of the residents? What is nice about Edina, it has had height restrictions for buildings fora reason and now it seems like that is being tossed out the window. Please don't allow the new city planner and staff to approve this kind of overdevelopment. There are already too many unknown (safety, traffic) issues with all of the above redevelopment efforts underway, in a very small area of the city that will have an enormous impact on our city, we don't need another monstrosity at the corner of 72nd and France. Best regards, Nancy Nancy J. Teasdale Regulatory Affairs Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. Edina, MN 55435 612- 237 -1026 Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 11:28 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: (no subject) Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952 -826 -04601 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 952 -826 -0236 4801 W. 50th St.1 Edina, MN 55424 cteague(ZDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdlnaMN.aov /Plannlna Mr" ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: JwrmbucWaol.com [mailto:JwrmbucWaol.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:23 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: (no subject) I think the six -story France Avenue project is not in keeping with this section of Edina and will add to traffic problems on France Avenue. Please decline the proposal Thanks. .Bill Buckley From: K. Norton [mailto:kajnorton @gmail.corn Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:23 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: 6 story France Avenue project I would like you to forward this email to the Planning Commission and present my email to the City Council on Tuesday. I am not attending the Council meeting as it is the All -Star game night, sigh. Kristine.Norton On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:42 AM, K. Norton <kajnorton ail.com> wrote: My husband and I are NOT supportive of this proposed rental /retail project that will be discussed at the City Council meeting. The project is too big, tall, and intense for our part of the City. Please do NOT support this project! I understand that it'does NOT fit the comprehensive plan for this part of the City of Edina. To change this plan would NOT be good for the City of Edina. Sincerely, Kristine arid. Keith Norton 7007 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 952- 200 -1451 or 952- 920 -6548 - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Dan Petrosky [mailto:d petros@ix.netcom.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:30 AM To: Cary Teague Subject :, ,.PROPOSED RENTAL/RETAIL PROJECT AT FRANCE AND 72ND. Mr. Teague Here are my comments reference the proposed rental /retail facility at France and 72nd. I.have also included these comments in a Word document and a pdf file: I hope my concerns can be shared with the planning commission. Dan Petrosky July 14, 2014 Daniel S. Petrosky 7204 Oaklawn Ave Edina MN 55435 cell 612 839 6890 Dear Mr. Teague Within the past few days someone left a message at our front door describing the proposed Rental /Retail Project proposed for the Southwest corner of France Avenue and 72nd Street. .It is quite obvious that this notice did not come from the City of Edina or the Planning Commission. My first reaction is to question why we not notified by the city first. My family has lived near the intersection of Oaklawn Ave and 72nd Street — Claremore Drive since 1985. Ever since we moved to this location the intersections of 72nd and Oaklawn Avenue and 72nd and Cornelia have experienced a significant amount of traffic that completely ignores the Stop signs. An Edina Police Officer told the that in his judgement these we the two worst intersections in the city. Since moving here traffic has dramatically increased. This seems to be the result of two developments. The retail business along France Avenue has increased over the years. Also, the resurfacing and reduction of the speed limit on 70th Street to 25 MPH. It is not unusual to see bumper to bumper traffic on both of these streets during the day, particularly during evening rush hour. A number of drivers heading East on 70th and South on France, or North on France and West on 70th have learned there is a simple way to avoid three traffic signal. The signals are at Cornelia and 70th; France and 70th and Hazelton and France. By cutting over 72nd Street and Claremore Drive an increasing number ofdrivers have learned to avoid these signals. By building the proposed high volume rental unit will increase the problem. We bought our home from the original owners. Recently our son bought a home from the original owner on Claremore Drive. This trend has resulted in a number of younger families in the area. Asa direct result there are far more bicycles, runners, walkers, including many that are pushing baby strollers on our streets. It should also be kept in mind that Claremore, 72nd Street and Cornelia border the city park adjacent to Cornelia School. It should also be kept in mind the Cornelia School is undergoing an expansion project. All of these factors will -be placed under increase danger by increasing the traffic in this area. I am definitely opposed to the. construction of this facility due to the increase danger to our neighborhood and a likely decrease in our property value. I have also.learned the occupants of rental property do not participate in the local community. Mr. Teague I hope my comments can be shared with the planning committee. Dan Petrosky Heather Branigin From: Teague Sent Sen Monday, July 14, 201412:24 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: PROPOSED RENTAL/RETAIL PROJECT AT FRANCE AND 72ND. Attachments: BUILDING.doc, BUILDING.pdf Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952-826-03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteague EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - -- Original Message--- - From: Dan Petrosky [mailto:d r)etros @ix.netcom.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 201411:30 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: PROPOSED RENTAL/RETAIL PROJECT AT FRANCE AND 72ND. Mr. Teague Here are my comments reference the proposed rental /retail facility at France and 72nd. I have also included these comments in a Word document and a pdf file. hope my concerns can be shared with the planning commission. Dan Petrosky July 14, 2014 Daniel S. Petrosky 7204 Oaklawn Ave Edina MN 55435 cell 612 839 6890 Dear Mr. Teague Within the past few days someone left a message at our front door describing the proposed Rental /Retail Project proposed for the Southwest corner of France Avenue and 72nd Street. It is quite obvious that this notice did not.come from the City of Edina or the Planning Commission. My first reaction is to question why we not notified by the city first. My family has lived near the intersection of Oaklawn Ave and 72nd Street — Claremore Drive since 1985. Ever since we moved to this location the intersections of 72nd and Oaklawn Avenue and 72nd and Cornelia have experienced a significant amount of traffic that completely ignores the Stop signs. An Edina Police Officer told me that in his judgement these we the two worst intersections in the city. Since moving here traffic has dramatically increased. This seems to be the result of two developments. The retail business along France Avenue has increased over the years. Also, the resurfacing and reduction of the speed limit on 70th Street to 25 MPH. It is not unusual to see bumper to bumper traffic on both of these streets during the day, particularly. during evening rush hour. A number of drivers heading Easton 70th and South on France, or North on France and West on 70th have learned there is a simple way to avoid three traffic signal. The signals are at Cornelia and 70th, France and 70th and Hazelton and•France. By cutting over 72nd Street and Claremore Drive an increasing number of drivers have learned to avoid these signals. By building the proposed high volume rental unit will increase the problem.., We bought our home'from the original owners. Recently our son bought a home from the original owner on Claremore Drive. This trend has resulted in a number of younger families in the area., As a direct result there are far more bicycles, runners, walkers, including many thataare.pushing baby,strollers on our streets. It should also be kept in mind that Claremore,, 72nd Street and Cornelia border the city park adjacent to Cornelia School. It should also be kept in mind the Cornelia'School is-undergoing an expansion project. - All,of:.these.factors will be placed under increase danger by increasing the traffic in this area. I am definitely opposed to the construction of this facility due to the increase - danger to our neighborhood and a likely decrease in our property value. I have also learned the occupants of rental property do not participate in the local community. Mr. Teague I hope my comments can be shared with the planning committee. Dan Petrosky 2 July 14, 2014 Daniel S. Petrosky 7204 Oaklawn Ave Edina MN 55435 cell 612 839 6890 Dear Mr. Teague Within the past few days someone left a message at our front door describing the proposed Rental /Retail Project proposed for the Southwest corner of France Avenue and 72nd Street. It is quite obvious that this notice did not come from the City of Edina or the Planning Commission. My first reaction is to question why we not notified by the city first. My family has lived near the intersection of Oaklawn Ave and 72 "d Street —Claremore Drive since 1985. Ever since we moved to this location the intersections of 72 "d and Oaklawn Avenue and 72 "d and Cornelia have experienced a significant amount of traffic that completely ignores the Stop signs. An Edina Police Officer told me that in his judgement these we the two worst intersections in the city. Since moving here traffic has dramatically increased. This seems to be the result of two developments. The retail business along France Avenue has increased over the years. Also, the resurfacing and reduction of the speed limit on 70`h Street to 25 MPH. It is not unusual to see bumper to bumper traffic on both of these streets during the day, particularly during evening rush hour. A number of drivers heading East on 70"' and South on France, or North on France and West on 70`h have learned there is a simple way to avoid three traffic signal. The signals are at Cornelia and 70"', France and 70"' and Hazelton and France. By cutting over 72nd Street and Claremore Drive an increasing number of drivers have learned to avoid these signals. By building the proposed high volume rental unit will increase the problem. We bought our home from the original owners. Recently our son bought a home from the original owner on Claremore Drive. This trend has resulted in a number of younger families in the area. As a direct result there are far more bicycles, runners, walkers, including many that are pushing baby strollers on our streets. It should also be kept in. mind that Claremore, 72nd Street and Cornelia border the city park adjacent to Cornelia School. It should also be kept in mind the Cornelia School is undergoing an expansion. project. All of these factors will be placed under increase danger by increasing the traffic in this area. I am definitely opposed to the construction of this facility due to the increase danger to our neighborhood and a likely decrease in our property value. I have also learned the occupants of rental property do not participate in the local community. Mr. Teague I hope my comments can be shared with the planning committee Dan Petrosky d _petros @ix.netcom.com From 'Bill Helgeson T_mailto:bill steelfabusa.com_1 Sent:,MondaV July 14, 201'4 11:30 AM Toi Cary Teague Cc: Lhelgeso(aagmail.com; 'Andrew Helgeson' Subject: 7200 France proposal We live at 7128 Lynmar Lane which-appears to be the closest residence to the proposed development at 7200 France Avenue. We object to this development in many ways: Already the Sunrise building across the street is 3 stories high and' significantly blocks the horiion to the east. The new apartments near the new Byerlys will be so tall as'to seriously exacerbate that issue and this proposal at 7200 France will choke off the sun until :midday.The ;immense increase in traffic, decrease in air quality, diminished neighborhood peace and quiet and negative Influence on our property value (not -what you tell us for your taxation) are all objections that we strongly voice. There should be no more waivers as they have become too common. This area has had enough construction and development close by and this new proposal is a most direct hit to the residential constituents of the Cornelia area. Please share this e-mail with the city council at their meeting on Tuesday, July 15. Sincerely, William and Lydia Helgeson Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 12:25 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: STOP 6 -story Monstrosity.on France and 72nd! Attachments: photo. lJPG;.ATT00001.txt photo 2.JPG; ATT00002.txt Carry Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952-826-0460,1 Fax 952 - 826 - 0389,1 Cell 952- 826 -0236 cteague@EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - -- Original Message--- - From: Johnson, Neil J I'mai Ito: Nei l.J .Johnson@ Health Partners.Com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 201411:36 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: STOP 6 -story Monstrosity on France and 72ndl I am sending this email to inform the City Council that our neighborhood is unanimously against this project, yet there may not be a huge showing on Tuesday. After receiving a flyer on Sunday I was appalled that this is even being considered! I, like many, cannot attend the Tuesday night meeting due to work but are very opposed to this project! I figured many were in my situation and felt the same way. In one hour this is how many signatures I got to stop the construction! Please listen to the people of Edina-.and do not build this monstrosity in our neighborhood. There are many.reasons everyone opposes this project including 1) increased traffic around children and a school, 2) increased crime around children and school, 3) outside the bounds of the Comprehensive Plan, 4) saturation of multiple apartment building in this area;already (by Byerlys, at Southdale, at Borofkas furniture, and by YMCA), 5) saturation leading to low quality units, 6) worry that apartment growth is occurring during boom cycle and bust cycle will lead to increased crime and depreciation of home values, 7) many children use sidewalk near intersection to go to school and play at playground, 8) depreciation of single home values, 9) lead to overcrowding.of schools and many more reasons that the community has described. The 24 below would like to stop this project. I would recommend we have a community discussion at a City Council meeting in the future when many of us can plan and,schedule to attend the meeting so we,may have our voice be heard. Many of us cannot attend with such little notice. Neil and Marie Johnson 612 - 709 -9090 cell This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact the sender. Disclaimer R001.0 From: K. Norton fmailto:kajnorton(alamail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 201411:43 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 6 story France Avenue project My husband and I are NOT supportive of this proposed rental/retail project that will be discussed at the City Council meeting. The project is too big, tall, and intense for our part of the City. Please do NOT support this project! I understand that it does NOT fit the comprehensive plan for this part of the City of Edina. To change this plan would NOT be good for the City of Edina. Sincerely, Kristine and Keith Norton 7007 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 952- 200 -1451 or 952- 920 -6548 From:. Mark Manfred [mailt6:mar1qulie44 gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:18 PM To: Cary Teague " Subject: France Avenue Development Dear Ms. Teague I'm an Edina resident who is concerned about the size and nature of the proposed redevelopment building at 72nd and France. The proposed 195 rental units is too much for an area that already has, so rental units. I'm also concerned that low income rentals seem to be disproportionately located in th4 SE quadrant of Edina. Mark Manfred - -- Original Message--- - From: Cindy Castle; [mailto:cindy ahotocastlexom] Sent:.Monday, July 14, 2014 12:12 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six =story France Avenue rental /retail project - Oppose Please present my objection to the Council that I oppose the proposed project. I believe it.is an inappropriate project for the neighborhood, and will add to traffic issues In the neighborhood. Traffic is already a burden in our neighborhood and this project-will only add to the traffic. Sincerely, Cindy Castle 7300 Wooddale Ave Edina, MN 55435 Heather Branigin From• . Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:27 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject, FW: The proposed, mixed use development for 7200 France Avenue Attachments: Development on 7200 France Avenue.pdf Cary Teague, Community Development Director . } t1�, 952- 826 -04601 Fax 952 - 826-03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236' 7 4801 W. 50th 5t. I Edina; MN 55424 cteaaueCaDEdlnaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov/Planninc Larnin g..Raisin Families & Do' Busine ss ss ... For Livin g, From: RICHARD E STEIN Finailto:rsteln8@)msn.com1 Sent: Monday, July 14, 201412:05 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: The proposed, mixed use development for 72WFrance Avenue Dear Cary K Teague, Attached is our letter of objections for the proposed development for. 7200 France. Sincerely, Richard Stein and Marianne Rother rstein8ernsn.com , 952 - 567 -1284 1 Dear Cary K Teague Re: The proposed, mixed use development for 7200 France Avenue We object to the plans for the following reasons: • The 6 story height of the structures as the west of France exceeds current use and does not fit in the comprehensive plan. A likely result is that the height will shadow the homes in the vicinity. • The housing density exceeds current use and does not fit the comprehensive plan. Many probable results will occur such as increased noise, increased traffic and demand on local resources that currently don't exist. • The plan was intended to develop property with this density and height within France and York and Avenue. West of York Avenue is intended to be lower height, lower density housing, smaller mixed use and single family dwellings. • The impact of increased traffic on the local neighborhoods will be objectionable, particularly 72 "d Street, which has family homes, sidewalks for walking and a local primary school. • The level of noise will increase which is not conducive to living in a residential neighborhood In the Immediate vicinity. In our opinion, the implementation of Edina's Comprehensive Plan has not addressed the increased sound, thus far and this 6 story project does not either. I believe the city has received complaints regarding noise from residents. • The inclusion of a restaurant will increase the noise, traffic and parking in the neighborhood. We understand that population growth is a natural consequence that Edina must plan for, but the impacts of the development on the current population must be considered. We have experienced development in the area, since we moved to Edina 20 years ago, and we continue to endure the impacts that have occurred. Edina must do more to implement plans to protect the current families that live in the neighborhoods that are impacted by development. Please consider these objections in the decision of the development. Sincerely, Marianne Rother and Richard Stein 7016 Bristol Blvd. 952 - 567 -1284 - - - -- Original :Message - - - -- From: Ladislaus Sledz Finailto:Iad sled z @smail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 261411:52 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave rental/ retail development plan I am writing to you because I am disturbed and upset to hear about the massive rental and retail project under consideration at 72nd and France Ave., in the midst of,our very residential neighborhoodl These plans strike me (and I hope you all as well) to be much too big for the. space and zoning laws, inappropriate for our elementary- school neighborhood, and; much to taxing for an already overburdened France Avenue. Traffic would become overwhelming along 72nd Street, which already gets clogged with school buses and cars during pickup and drop off times. It's depressing enough that we're already losing our beloved Fred Richards golf course to development, and seeing huge rental overbuilding of the Southdale/ Galleria/ Byerly':s areas near us. This all seems to be getting out of control, and not in keeping with the Edina Council's concern with current tear down/ build up mentalities when it comes to residential homes. If you believe that more rentals are really needed, what about expanding on, or building in an already rental area, like along Parklawn Avenue? Please look out for your own Edina neighborhoods' interests, and resist the pressure of an overzealous developer. Thanks. Lad Sledz, 7321 Cornelia Drive. From: Dale Johnson fmailto:didolphinsCa gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:32 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Strongly opposed to proposed development at 72nd and France Dear Mr. Teague, I am very concerned about the proposed development at 72"d and France. I live on Mavelle Drive near Cornelia school, and having such a large development there would significantly increase the traffic through the residential neighborhood and school zone as many people would cut through to try to avoid the traffic on France Avenue, which is already congested. A couple streets near Cornelia have sidewalks, but most do not, so the safety of kids walking to school would also be compromised, especially in winter. Before Sunrise was built across the street, a larger development was proposed that also would have jeopardized safety in the area, but that was not approved. Sunrise does not generate a significant amount of traffic. The location of this new, much larger proposed development simply does not make sense, and I am strongly opposed to it. Please present this to the Council tomorrow and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you. Dale Johnson From: A. Lynn Misselt [mailto:lymmisselt (agmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:39 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development at 7200 France Ave Dear Mr. Teague, We only recently learned about the proposed development. at 7200 France Ave, which is to be introduced before the Edina Planning Commission and City Council. As long -time residents in the affected neighborhood we know the importance of balancing desire for growth and re- development with needs for efficient traffic management and safety. We join with other neighbors in asking that you and the Council assure that', any approved development be fully consistent with the existing comprehensive plan. Development and related congestion seem to be advancing very rapidly. Approved redevelopment of Byerly's and the related housing projects, the Southdale housing project, and the expected high rise project on Xerxes will all heavily impact traffic and access .to /from the surrounding neighborhoods. Congestion and delays in the Southdale area are already significant even before taking the full hit of these projects. It's very hard to imagine how a project of the size and density proposed at 7200 France can also be absorbed— especially for those of us who depend on access to the intersection at 72nd and France. We are also concerned about the traffic and parking effects for proposed changes to the Fred Richards golf area. We have already had a LOT of redevelopment affecting our neighborhood. We will be monitoring this proposal and the Council's handling of it closely. Regards, Alvin and Christine Misselt 4425 Dunham Drive Edina, MN 55435 From: Dale Johnson fmailto:djdolphinyCbcimail.corn Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:32 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Strongly opposed to proposed development. at 72nd and France Dear Mr. Teague, I ain very concerned about the proposed development at 72nd and'France. I live on Mayelle Drive near Cornelia school, and having such a'large development there would significantly increase the traffic through the residential neighborhood.and school'zone as many people would cut through to try to avoid the traffic on France Avenue, which is already congested. A couple streets near Cornelia have. sidewalks, but most do not, so the safety of kids walking to school would also be compromised, especially in winter. Before Sunrise was built across the street, a larger development was proposed that also would have jeopardized safety in`the area, but that was not approved. Sunrise does not generate a significant amount of traffic. The location of this new,, much, larger proposed development simply'does not make. sense, and I am strongly opposed to it., Please present this to the Council tomorrow and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you. Dale Johnson From: Maureen Wong [mailto:mwong(ddisplaysales.com Sent :' Monday, July 14, 201412:44 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 72nd -and France Greetings Cary, I am offering our feedback as a residents on 72nd St. to the France Ave. project. 72nd street is a residential street. This road will not support the traffic this massive complex will bring. It appears that a major entrance is on 72nd St. Already cars and trucks travel too fast along 72nd St., day and night — we know because we sleep approximately 9 =10 yards from the curb of 72nd St. Traffic would increase exponentially on this street, with an Elementary School just a few blocks away. It won't be safe for children walking to school. The project boasts a density of population in a very small parcel of land which is extremely disturbing and alarming to me to say nothing of:the traffic retail businesses will bring. We respectfully request this project be re- considered. It is out of place at this location. There are several brand new residential buildings in the area and we have not yet realized the extra traffic they will bring. I suggest we wait about 10 years to see how they work out before considering this project. And then it should be scaled way back, keeping it at a limit of stories and other current requirements regarding density of population. Please consider Edina residents and the daily stress a project like this will bring. Sincerely, Maureen & Kathleen Wong 7128 Bristol Blvd. Edina, MN. 55435 952 927 008'9 - - -- Original Message---- - From: David Scott [mailto•dozuni0cox.net] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 12:44 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six story Project on 72nd st & France Av Dear Sir: I have lived in my home at 7124 Bristol Bvd in Edina since August of 1965.1 am less than three blocks from the proposed project on France Av & 72nd st. The density of,the proposed project is way' beyond what the area can support. The traffic in the area is already at a very high level.& people are already constantly cutting through my neighborhood to avoid the congestion on'France ay. I can't imagine what it will be like if you allow this proposed project to go forward. Please do not allow for the variance that is required to build this six story building & put a break on destroying our lovely neighborhood. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Regards, Cletus F Dozark 6 Heather Branigin From: Tom Terwilliger < TTerwilliger @buffalowildwings.com >. Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:34 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Scott H..Neal; KStaunton @EdinaMN.gov Subject: 7200 France Ave. Dear Cary: This email is to express my wife and my disagreement with the proposed six story development at 7200 France Ave. I grew up in the Cornelia neighborhood and returned 'as an adult with my wife where we have lived for the past 20 years raising our six children. I mention this because we are familiar with`the site and the traffic patterns in the Cornelia neighborhood. We believe that the current building is outdated and does not fully utilize the site and that therefore the redevelopment of the, site would be positive. However, we completely oppose the size and density of what is being proposed. Without question the vast majority of ingress and egress traffic for Hwy 100 would cut through the Cornelia neighborhood regardless of the time of day or what efforts were made to encourage traffic immediately onto France Ave. Most likely the traffic would involve 72nd & Cornelia Dr. to and from 701h St. I understand that this is no different today with the current office building: However, underthe proposed plan the amount of traffic would increase greatly from the current use orfrom what the 2008 Comp plan allows for on the site. we also have concerns on how this development could potentially effect the size of Cornelia Elementary School; particularly as other housing developments are already planned or under construction in the area. With the above said I admit that neither my wife or I have taken the time yet to fully educate ourselves on this issue and development but at this time we strongly oppose the proposed development as it is presently being proposed. Respectfully, Tom & Michelle Terwilliger. 7421 Kellogg Ave. Edina, MN 942 - 842 -8109 1 - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Geeta Dash [mailto•larsondash @comcast.netl Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 2:08 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Ave rental /retail project proposal PLEASE FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Dear Mr. Teague, We strongly oppose consideration of the proposal for a six -story rental /retail project at 7200 France Ave. The huge development would disrupt the quality of the nearby quiet neighborhood, school and park, which are attractions for moving to this part of Edina. Traffic would increase on an already overburdened France Avenue. I feel I take my life in my hands each time I try to ride my bicycle across France at Hazelton Road during work hours. For children, this issue is even more critical. The proposal exceeds city requirements for limited building height, housing density and floor area ratio, which were put in place for important reasons. Consideration of this proposal undermines the confidence Edina residents have in our City Council. Sincerely, Geeta Dash and Eric Larson West Shore Drive From: Johnson, Janet R [mailto•ianet.rovick.iohnson @ delta.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:43 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Retail/Rental Development at 72nd and France Dear Mr. Teague, I am extremely concerned about the Retail /Rental project planned for 72, and France. This project is way too large for the space and inappropriate for our residential neighborhood. We fought a similar type of project before Sunrise was built when a developer wanted 2 large office buildings to occupy that space (which pale in comparison to the size of the new:proposed development). Many neighbors, including myself, voiced our concerns about increased traffic congestion cutting through our neighborhood and the impact that would have "on Cornelia Elementary school. I do not feel that we need more apartments, luxury or not, in this area of Edina when there are numerous apartments along Parklawn and York Avenues, recently built ones over by CVS, Cornelia Place on W. 65a', and they are now building ones on the Southdale property. I don't want this area of Edina to become a transient neighborhood that is becoming over -run with apartments. I AM DEFINITELY OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECTM Please present this to the Council tomorrow and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you.- Janet Rovick Johnson From: TDOMEYER(a)comc6st. net. fmailto•TDOMEYERCcacomcast.net1 Sent: Monday, July 14, 20141:41 PM To- Cary Teague CC: Tracey Mankowski; Mankowski, Jeff Subject: six story France Ave rental /retail project Cary, I would like to let you know that as a resident of Edina, living on Cornelia Drive, I OPPOSE the building of a 6:story rental/retail project on 72nd & France Ave. This is.a massive project that exceeds many building codes in place for Edina. It is too big for the space and too close and inappropriate for residential neighborhood. Proposed 6 stories when only 4.are currently allowed! Density of 50 units /acre when only 30 units /acre are currently allowed! Floor area ratio of 1-41 When .5 is- currently allowed! - This project is TOO BIG and TOO CLOSE to residential Edina and to the Cornelia Elementary School I live on Cornelia Drive, across from the elementary school. The traffic on our street has increased considerably since I move here in 2000. This increase in traffic is due to the massive amount of new retail and housing complex's that have been built in Edina on or near France Ave. This area is becoming more and more congested "with traffic and the cut thru for those who want to avoid some of this traffic is Cornelia Drive!! If this oversized project is allowed, it will congest things even more and the traffic will increase. This is not safe for our neighborhood or Cornelia Elementary School children! Edina residents did not move to Edina to be swallowed up by high rises, traffic, office buildings and being in a big city. If we wanted that, we would have moved downtown. We moved here for the small town feel but within short drive of.downtown. My expectation from you is that you present my email the council on Tuesday, July 15th and that you forward a ,copy of my email to the Planning Commission. Thank you for your assistance and regards, Tracey Mankowski 7105 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN From: Tom Terwilliger f_mailto:TTerwilliger buffalowildwinas.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014. 1:34 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Edina Mail; ionibennett12(&comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); ioshsprague( edinarealty com; swensonannl(a)gmail.com; Scott H.. Neal; KStaunton@EdinaMN.gov _ Subject: 7200 France Ave. Dear Cary: This email is to express my wife and my disagreement with the proposed six story development at 7200 France Ave. I grew up in the Cornelia neighborhood and returned as an adult with my wife where we have lived for the past 20 years raising our six children. I mention this because we are familiar with the site and the traffic patterns in the Cornelia neighborhood. We believe that the current building is outdated and does not fully utilize the site and that therefore the redevelopment of the site would be positive. However, We completely oppose the size and density of what is being proposed. Without question the vast majority of ingress and egress traffic for Hwy 100 would cut through the Cornelia neighborhood regardless of the time of day or what efforts were made to encourage traffic immediately onto France Ave. Most likely the traffic would involve 72 "d & Cornelia Dr. to and from 70"' St. I understand that this is no different today with the current office building. However, under the proposed plan the amount of traffic would increase greatly from the current use or from what the 2008 Comp plan allows for on the site. We also have concerns on how this development could potentially effect the size of Cornelia Elementary School, particularly as other housing developments are already planned or under construction in the area. With the above said I admit that neither my wife or .I have taken the time yet to fully educate ourselves on this issue and.development but at this time we strongly oppose the proposed development as it is presently being proposed. Respectfully, Tom & Michelle Terwilliger 7421 Kellogg Ave. Edina, MN 942 -842 -8109 From: Johnson, Seth H rmailto:siohnson cbburnet.com Sent: Monday, July 14, 2.014 1:27 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Six.Story- Building at 72nd•& France Cary K. Teague, My wife and I are not inafavor this proposed development. The City Council seems to be exceeding building codes_and zoning laws to favor larger and.larger projects.to the detriment of the.-residential neighborhoods. This project will create massive traffic increases throughout the Cornelia neighborhood as there are only, a, few ways of ingress and egress. Also, building height and density `needs to conform with current`laws to help mitigate a negative impact to the neighborhood:'` There are already several other new projects "close to 72nd & France (Byerly's & 60th & York) that will substantially increase traffic. We, are against this project as proposed. Please share my email at the city council meeting Tuesday 7/15 & forward a copy to the planning commission. Respectfully, Seth H. & Cecily T. Johnson 7121 Heatherton Trail Edina, MN 55435 From: Melanie Berg [mailto:jebergfamily @ q.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:07 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: NO to New Development on 72nd and France Dear Mr Teague: Please, please, please, share our'opinion with the City Council: Vote NO to anew building at 72"d and France. We still haven't recovered from the monstrosity Westin hi -rise ... what is happening to our beautiful suburb? Is there no end to this madness? France Ave. is already a disaster traffic wise, this will`add substantially to that,burden. A tall building there will negatively impact the view, Cornelia Elementary School, the neighboring streets and frankly the entire city. The city of Edina does not need more multiple dwelling housing in this area. The Byerly's retail and, housing project across the street is enough already. Resulting Congestion is just too much,like a big city, not our quaint suburb we know and love. PLEASE! No more! Sincerely, Melanie Berg 7417 W Shore Dr Edina 565435 - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Sandy ,fmailto:sandrewl2(@aol.coml Sent: Monday, July 14,:201412:58 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Project at 72nd and France We have been reviewing information about'the proposed project`at72nd and France. -We live at 4433 Ellsworth Drive in Edina. We are very concerned about the size, density and location of the proposed project.. It is incompatible with the existing'neghborhood. The'size will further stress the already inadequate infrastructure in the area. Traffic along; France Avenue is already too great. A high density project like this will also make it more difficult for `pedestrians to safely cross France. The height of the proposed project is too great considering that it borders a residential area. Our bottom line is that we do not want to see this proposed project approved in its current form. Please read this email to the City Council at the upcoming meeting on this project. Thank you! John and Sandy Carlson (952) 926 -0545 Sent from my iPhone From: glen whitesell rmailto :dgwhitesell@comcast.netl Sent: Monday, July. 14, 2014 2:16 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: joshsprag_ue@)edinarealty.com Subject: 7200 France project Mr. Cary Teague, AICP As 39 year residents of the South Cornelia neighborhood, we may be'typical Edina constituents -who take pride in developing a thriving, quality community. 1 am a retired corporate real estate professional with degrees in architecture and business. As such, I can see both sides of this proposal. I don't like it. Please do not encourage this development proposal any further. I believe there has been inadequate consideration of the impact on the community by the developers. I have yet to find a similar high density development anywhere near a residential area like ours. Please provide this to the full council as well as the Planning Commission. Thank you, Glen Whitesell 7116 Heatherton Trail See Attached: RE: 7200 France proposal ■ Site size and, lot lines? The north lot line of this site is in the center of 72 "d. Code states that setbacks are from either the lot line or public right of way. So ... the developer has used the center of the street (the lot line) to define the north setback. For a 35 foot setback, that leaves only 5 feet curb to building (80' facade). They also show the eastern setback as 90' from some point on France Avenue. According to HC survey, the east property line is at the curb. They have noted 48' from the curb. ■ Height, density and use. I agree with the basic concept of apartments or apartments and office. Retail and restaurants are questionable on this side of France Avenue due to access. I often enter our area by coming from the north, turning right on 72 "d Even with my turn signal on for a block, the 40 mph traffic is pressing. 7200 France Avenue Proposal 1 July 14, 2014 Our current neighborhood (South Cornelia) has 482 residential parcels. Adding 195 units is a 40% increase within a relatively small area. The height is the greatest issue. This is an "edge area" on the comprehensive plan which is to buffer the higher density to the east from the residential to the west. This project appears more as a "wall" than a buffer. It feels more urban than what should abut single - family areas. The green -space enclosed within the "U" only benefits the development. With six stories on the South and East, it would lack the required sunlight to grow reasonable greenery. Here are similar buildings but are only four stories and are in more concentrated urban areas. Due to narrow urban setbacks, these are also massive in their settings. Excelsior & Grand Project (4 stories) Imagine it 2 stories taller! 7200 France Avenue Proposal July 14, 2014 Lyndale & 76th (only four stories) could not find any six -story developments in or near a single - family neighborhood. Please do not allow this project to proceed as designed. Edina has a history of choosing quality over quantity. Architects need to be challenged to match and improve the environment of the area, not diminish it. You have heard it before... paper does not refuse ink. Please choose wisely on our behalf. Thank you Glen and Sharon Whitesell 7116 Heatherton Trail South Cornelia Neighborhood 7200 France Avenue Proposal 3 July 14, 2 014 From: Jack Rice rmaiito.ricecompany @ aol.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 11:32 AM To: James Hovland; jonibennettQ2 bcomcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsgrauue(a)edinareaity.com; Swenson Ann Cc: Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague Subject: 3922 West 49th Street Dear Mayor and Council members: We will be unable to attend the July 15, 2014 council meeting and include our written comments in support of the proposed Mortenson development at 3922 W. 49`' Street. We live at 4001 W. 49th Street, four houses to the west of the subject property. We have no objection to rezoning the property from R -1 to R -2. Our home is R -2 as is almost the whole south side of West 49th Street from France Avenue to Maple Road and about one half of the north side of West 49th Street from France to Townes Road. Our home is on a lot that was redeveloped from an existing R -2 double bungalow in 2006. This year, 3929 West 49th Street was completed as a redeveloped R -2 double unit and 3932 West 49' Street (an existing double) has been approved for demolition and plans submitted for redevelopment. The property is bordered on the east by a four story apartment building, on the south by commercial property fronting on W 49 1/2 Street and on the west by R -2. It seems that the request to rezone R -2 is reasonable under the circumstances. We understand the proposed plan would require a 2.5% variance for lot coverage if the council agrees with the rezoning to R -2. That also seems reasonable. In summary we support Mr. Mortenson's proposed development. We know of no neighborhood objection. Our opinion is the R -2 zoning is appropriate for the site and that redevelopment of this property would be beneficial to the neighborhood. Thank you, Jack & Ede Rice 952- 927 -8372 Heather Branigin From: Melody Sledz <melodysledz @gmail.com> Sent Monday, July 14, 2014 3:09 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcastnet; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com Subject 6 -Story rental /retail project in residential Edina - 72nd and France Ave - please oppose!! Begin forwarded message: From: Melody Sledz <melodysledza_gmail.com> Subject: 6 -Story rental /retail project in residential Edina - 72nd and France Ave Date: July 14, 2014 at 11:04:40 AM CDT To: cteaque(Medinamn.gov We residents of the Cornelia area of Edina are shocked and appalled at the massive rental project under consideration at 72nd and France Ave in our very residential neighborhood! These plans are much too big for the space and zoning laws, extremely inappropriate for our elementary- school neighborhood, and much too taxing for an already overburdened France Avenue. It's enough that we're already losing our wonderful neighborhood golf course to development and seeing huge rental overbuilding of the Southdale/ Galleria/ Byerly's areas near us. This is getting crazy! And slightly ironic, in light of the Edina Council's concern with current tear down/ build up housing mentalities. If more rentals are really, truly needed, what about expanding or building on existing Parklawn Avenue, in what is already a rental area? Please look out for your own Edina neighborhoods' interests instead of the pressure of an overzealous developer. Thank you! Melody Sledz, 7321 Cornelia Drive Heather. Braniain From: Dan Kelley <kellot @aol.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:54 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland: My wife Lilyan and I have lived in Edina for 37 years, first on Lakeview Drive and for the past 20+ years on Woodland Circle, and we have always supported the government and planning of the city. I am writing to ask your support of the 66 West Affordable Housing Development. Please consider approving a change in the zoning laws to support this project. 66 West is a perfect location -- it is close to jobs at Southdale and Metro Transit Bus Service, both important factors for the-residents, and it is removed from residential neighborhoods, which I'm,sure will be a consideration:: My church, Christ the King; has, been active in working to alleviate homelessness and we'll work with special passion for fruition of the 66 West project to help homeless children in the suburbs. When our children were growing up in Edina they were fortunate.to have a happy and supportive home. We — and all Edina families = should 'do everything we can to help children who are less fortunate and provide a safe home for them. We hope you'll agree as you consider this important project Thank you for all you do for our community. 1 Heather Branigin From: John Dolejsi <JDolejsi @CareMinders.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:11 PM To: Cary Teague, Edina Mail Cc: marydolejs @aol.com Subject: Re: 7200 France Ave redevelopment project My wife and I are 28 year residents of the Edina Cornelia community. We have raised 4 children in this area at 7216 Cornelia Drive. We have started several businesses in Edina including one that was located at 7200 France Ave building for years. We are VERY opposed to the massive scale of this project and the impact on the safety and character of our community. The density, size and types of use will generate a massive increase in traffic and put all of our children at risk. How many casualties and fatalities would this increased traffic cause in the closely situated elementary school, church, residential are and at France Ave which is already overwhelmed in this area. The city went thru this same problem with a far more modest proposal directly across 72nd Street which was 1/2 the size of this proposal and it was scaled back in size and traffic impact to the Sunrise Building. The Byerly's project will be increasing local traffic shortly. Perhaps this massive proposal is intended to push so far that a significant scale back is what the developers already expect. We strongly request keeping the current Cities Comprehensive Plan unaltered. Including the 4 story maximum height, housing density maximum of 30/ acre and floor area ratio of 0.5. Please keep us safe and let us maintain a quality of life Edina has stood for. Please read this email at tomorrows City Council meeting on this matter. John and Mary Dolejsi 7216 Cornelia Drive Edina Cell 612.845.5845 From: Stan Zahorsky r mailto :szahorsky(&zahorskylaw.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:27 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: twincities*bizjournals.com; lisa.kacczke ecm- inc.com Subject: Opposition to Six -Story. France Avenue Rental /Retail Project Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina Mr. Teague: I specifically request that before the, Tuesday, July 15, 2014 Council Meeting you present this email to the members of the Edina City Council and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. My wife; Jan, and I have been residents of Edina since 1986 and currently reside at 7129 Bristol Blvd. have been the owner of a business located in Edina since 1984. We would be directly and adversely affected by the proposed six -story rental /retail project that is proposed,for 72nd St. and France Avenue. The City has already approved development projects and undertaken street revisions that contribute to congestion in the corridor between Hwy 62 and 1-494 and Hwy 100 and York Avenue South.You have already approved apartmenticondo projects in the Southdale parking lot, the Galleria Residences and Hotel, and the Byerly's apartment and condo development at 72nd St. and France Avenue. These developments have and will continue to increase traffic congestion for all residents living, working and /or shopping in this area of Edina. This congestion is further exacerbated by the apartment/condo developments planned or already existing on the east side of York Avenue. Additionally, the City of Edina has exacerbated the traffic congestion with its changes to the streets of 70th Street, France Avenue, and Haelton Road. This increased vehicle traffic must be routed some place, and by decreasing lanes that move the vehicles through the area and installing other impediments to ingress and egress, you are making this area of Edina less safe and more hostile to residents and visitors-in this area. It is my understanding that there have already been three accidents at the roundabout on 70th St. west of France Avenue. I have found that it is much more difficult to enter onto. 70th St. in the afternoon from the area west of France Avenue to Cornelia Drive and have almost been hit several times by cars approaching from the east at Bristol Blvd. The-City expects its citizens to live by the rules that it establishes. That goes all of the way from obeying traffic laws to zone regulations. Now, the City of Edina is seeking to exempt the project owners from the zoning regulations at 72nd and.France. A project with 170 luxury apartments.and 25 row houses, along with retail and parking, is a huge complex for this area. The City acknowledges that it is a big project by proposing to amend the comprehensive plan to allow for a six -story building: which is two stories more than currently allowed, increasing the housing density from 30 units to-50 units per acre, and changing the floor area ratio from 0.5 up to 1.41. This project with increase traffic through the neighborhood via 72nd St. past Cornelia Elementary School (thereby' increasing the danger to elementary-school children) or other side streets where-children .play. It will also substantially add to the. congestion of France Avenue which is already being made' worse by reducing the number of,lanes on a very main artery into and out of the area. Further, this project is incompatible with the comprehensive plan. Throughout Edina the City has expended large sums of money to create bicycle lanes and to make the streets more "pedestrian friendly," but this project increases traffic in the neighborhood which is the antithesis of -the use of the neighborhood streets by pedestrians, bicyclists, and children. This development will adversely affect my property values and my enjoyment of life without compensation. As a lawyer, homeowner, Edina businessman, and member of an Edina family, I believe the approval of any project in which the comprehensive plan must be changed before the project can proceed would be a taking of my property without just compensation and a violation of one :of the most F sacred. constitutional, rights which is afforded my family and „me as a. resident and citizen of Edina and the United States. Since my backyard faces this complex; it appears from the proposed,picture of the project that the tenants /owners of the upper, stories of the complex. will have a line of sight into my back yard and windows. I find this to be an invasion of privacy . that adversely affects the use of my back yard and decreases the value-of my home when Iseli it.. Henoe l strongly oppose `both this- project and-any revision to the,comprehensive plan-that would allow . . the project to proceed: Although 1 do not have personal knowledge, except through antidotes told by neighbors that I trust, I was informed that when City Hall was called to ascertain information from City employees to learn about the project, the. responses were evasive and less than forthright. Since employees and elected, officials are public servants, serving for the benefit of their. citizens, I find that such behavior to be unworthy of bseputable community and believe that such actions-by employees and elected officials, should cease. Stan and. Jan Zahorsky ; 7129 Bristol Blvd Edina,�MN 55435 Heather Braniain From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:30 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Please stop the 6 story rental development Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 I Fax 952- 826 0891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteasue @EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.eov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Marie Johnson [mailto:saumson @gmail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:22 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Please stop the 6 story rental development Hi Cary, I live less than a half mile from the proposed development at 72nd and France. We are already have a busy corner at Cornelia and 72nd and putting in 195 units in our neighborhood will only increase this traffic. We already have developments being built by Byerly's, in southdale parking lot, and two others along York. I would like to see something much smaller that fits in with the rest of France avenue. We live in asafe and quiet'neighborhood and it's the main reason we moved here 2 years ago. Please don't over crowd our neighborhood or build something that doesn't fit with the style of our neighborhood. Thank you, Marie Johnson 1 From: Marls Chamberlain fmailto:beetlebug00@gmaii.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:19 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Av. Dear Mr. Teague, I am writing to you about the proposed rental /retail project at 7200 France Avenue, and ask that you forward these comment to the Edina Planning Commission and the Edina City Council. In my opinion, the current six story proposal by DJR Architecture, Boisclair Corp. and NHH Properties is way too massive for the site, and this type of commercial development does not belong at the entrance to a residential neighborhood. It wasn't that many years ago that a Comprehensive Plan was created for our City, a plan that looked at the big picture to guide future redevelopment so that we ended up with a well orchestrated result. Unfortunately, it seems that recently the City has been all too quick to abandon the Comprehensive Plan in favor of doing piece meal projects, as demonstrated by their recent approval of a six story building on York Avenue where the Comprehensive Plan limited the height to four stories. On the heels of that abandonment of the Comprehensive Plan, we now have another developer asking for the same variance to the four story height limit, only this time the proposed project is adjacent to an Edina neighborhood and just blocks from an elementary school. It is also no secret that the traffic on France Avenue has been at over - capacity levels for years, and the current reconstruction to narrow the driving lanes in favor of adding bike lanes will not help that situation. As we were told by the City when W. 70th Street was recently reconstructed, narrowing the lanes will have a calming effect on traffic which will help to slow it down. Well, we don't need to slow the traffic down on France Av. any more than it already is, we need to move the traffic out of there. Putting a project of this magnitude along this stretch of France Av. will only exacerbate the current situation. I would also like to remind you, the Planning Commission, and the City Council of the history of the 7100 block of France Av., just to the north of this proposed project, as I don't believe any of you held your current positions at that time. Back in the late 1990's, The Lutheran Church of the Master owned this property when they closed their doors. A developer wanted to replace the church with a four story office building, but this plan was rejected, in large part due to neighborhood concerns of the increased traffic that would be added to our residential streets. The City seemed to be much more sensitive to the character of our neighborhoods back then, and the City Planner at the time told me that even though current zoning allowed for four stories on the site, they weren't interested in maximizing the site, and only wanted it to be three stories. The result was the developer withdrew his offer on the property, which was then purchased by Sunrise, and a very attractive residential facility that is a nice fit with our neighborhood was built. I ask that the City respond in a similar fashion now in 2014. Before giving serious consideration to the proposal before you, give serious consideration to how you would like to see the site redeveloped, and how that fits in with the overall Comprehensive Plan and the neighborhood. Given the fact that there is already a two story office building on the site, what can.be.put there that will add minimal, if any, traffic to France Av. and the neighborhood streets? The City says they want more affordable housing even as they allow affordable houses to be torn down and replaced with more expensivel homes, and there must be well over,2000 rental units.either already available today.or under construction within a 1 -1/2 mile radius of this'property. '-Why not consider a Town Home development where young families could actually purchase as a starter home in Edina rather than rent? .Make it a nice development where they could have their'own lawnand garden space. Don't go for maximum density, go for maximum quality of.life. A good redevelopment option for this site will surface at some time, but this current proposal, even if it get's scaled down to four stories, is not it.. Mark Chamberlain. Edina, MN Heather Branigin From• • Barb Halloran <barbhalloran @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Avenue rental /retail project Dear Mr. Teague, I am writing to express my complete disapproval of the proposed plan to build a six -story rental /retail project in our Cornelia area. I have lived in my house on Belvidere Lane for 40 years, raising my family in this fine neighborhood. The project to build a massive apartment complex with retail businesses is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood on our side of France Avenue. Our area is being inundated with car and bus traffic due to the numerous apartment and retail developments that have been or are being built in and around Southdale. This proposed project is the most invasive to us since it will directly impact our ability to move onto France Avenue or, conversely, have access to our neighborhood. Please present my email to the Edina Council on Tuesday, July 15. In the past 40 years, my perception of our city councils has been positive ... one that looks out for the best interests of its residents, keeping our neighborhoods vibrant and livable. continue protect the interests of its residents. Barbara Halloran I'm hopeful that the planning commission and city council will Heather Braniain From: Kari Hailing <hallingfamily @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:16 PM To; Cary Teague. Subject: Potential apartment project? Dear Mr Teague, MY-name is Kari Hailing, I am an Edina resident in the Cornelia neighborhood. My husband Hart and I have 4 children that have gone through Cornelia Elementary and 3 of our children are still in the school system in Edina. One of my neighbors brought to my attention a massive apartment building project recently presented to the Edina Planning Commission. I have two concerns regarding this project: 1) The numbers are staggering; 195 rental units; 45,000 square feet, 25 row homes. -2 restaurants. This project is too big for the lot, and too big for the neighborhood. The France Ave corridor is already congested and much of the apartment building construction in the area is not even completed. 72nd and the adjoining side streets were never intended for such high housing density. Similarly, Cornelia elementary, is not prepared for such a massive expansion of the student base. 2) Lack of communication regarding City_p_I_annin . I learned of this project only through discussions with my neighbors, who themselves learned of the project serendipitously. Like' all my neighbors, I am heavily invested in Cornelia and I would expect that my city government would inform my neighbors and me in the planning stages of such a large and potentially neighborhood- changing project. Please present this letter to the City Council at the Tuesday, July 15th meeting and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Sincerely, God bless, Kari:) i Heather Branigin From: gchrich @comcast.net Sent: Monclay; lulyJ4, 2014 4:16 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: SIX story enlargement of commercial project 720.0 France Please consider the homeowners who love our neighbor.and love living in Edina. Whereas the Sunrise development was willing to ..keep the;image of the neighborhood and listened to the residents as their neighbors, we feel it is very inconsiderate for Edina Planning Commission knows how therres dents felt at thft mrules on this mixed used project. The e-and yet after that community input to even consider the very significant amendments .this builder wants for profit from this area is purely selfish 1. Edina has a reputation for not being highly commerical with lots of tall buildings that add huge percentages of traffic and polution. We must stop changing the image of our community. 2. Why would Edina decide the allow this builder to go beyond the 4 story city, plan, especially directly in a residential area? Would y..ou,allow this a couple blocks from your home? Would you be concerned about not only the view but the value of your home for resale? We are near a school and now the people who want a home near the school will reconsider the traffic and the °lack of residential feel to the neighborhood. 3. Why would the city also allow a proposal for so many residents which is almost double the allowed previously from 30units to 50units per acre. ....Floor area ratio allowed from .5 to this at 1.41. 4. France avenue is already a'challenge.for the_number of cars, and'of course more pollution. The roads now does not handle it well as your try to turn onto france from 7200. Lots of walkers of all ages walk to Byerlys and just love walking our neighborhood. More cars ...more traffic ... more problems. 5. These situations arise with so little notice the average working family gets a flier with first knowledge of this and then it is already tight notice to appear somewhere or to find a quick moment to email in time. This feels very, inappropriate to treat the loyal taxpayers this way. Please stop further consideration,of,this project until the plan is revised to be fair to the residents..... and please expect those who wish to profit from the Edina address to stay-within NOT exceed the City Comprehensive Plan. Like many people it is too short of notice to show up at your Council Meeting tomorrow. Please consider this email as my presence to express by sincere disappointment of the lack of loyalty from .the city to the residents who'pay the price to live here in a safe and happy neighborhood in a suburban not urban environment This is being sent at 4:07 pm I am in hopesAt'will be read and put in whatever tally you may be keeping against the project in its present proposal. Richardson family• Heather Branigin From: Joypen Walters <joybenwalters@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 20144:13 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Development at 72 & France I We have just become aware of a proposed development at the SW corner of 72nd & France. Is increased density the only game in town and why should there be a project like this with 6 stories shadowing homes behind it and retail shops creating more traffic . just two blocks from an elementary school? We all know there are luxury apartments being built- directly across France Ave. and also on 69th St. Family homes are.still in demand in residential areas in Edina such as ours and we do not want their value diminished. Thank you for your consideration. Ben and Joyce Walters ......... 7317 Wooddale Ave.; Edina, MN 9 r 1 Heather Branigin From: nsourova @aol.com Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:11 PM Tc: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Rental /Relail Project at France and W 72nd Street Dear Mr. Teague, From recent publication in Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal we've learned that Edina City is reviewing a project to build new six -story rental /retail building in the intersection of France Ave and W. 72 Street - in lieu of the office building that currently occupies this lot. While we support development of Edina and understand that SW corner of the city is an easiest and therefore most attractive location for new constructions, we have serious reservations regarding the scale of the proposed project. From the article and additional research we understand that the proposed new construction will require to make more change to the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan (e.g., increase max height of the building; increase housing density). The location chosen by developers (France and 72nd) seems very tight for such big construction. Added to the new apartment building, which is already under construction next to Byerly's grocery store (straight across France Ave. from 72nd Street), this 6 -story apartment will create a tremendous burden on both infrastructure of the area and life condition of the existing residential neighborhood. We understand City Council's responsibility to maintain and improve the City where we live and which we love. For that you need money. However we voice our concerns about decisions that, though bring additional income to the city will considerable deteriorate living conditions of existing residential neighborhood. Suggestions for your consideration: 1. Spread out from new residential buildings, including the one that is already under construction next to Byerly's 2. Consider using a lot occupied by office buildings further to the South on France and not so close to the existing residential area and route to the Cornelia School 3. Limit height of all new buildings (including the one in question) located close to residential neighborhoods, to max 4 stories 4. Limit housing density with the one, already approved and included into the City Comprehensive Plan (50 units per acre) 5. Please be careful with accommodation of developers' requests and needs at the expense of current residents. While considering any decision that the elected position authorizes you to make, please subscribe to the idea of treating the existing residents with respect to their needs and looking for their best interests. Please try to limit your decisions with those that do not cause harm to us, Edina residents. Please include this email into materials that will be presented to The City Council tomorrow, July 15, 2014. 1 Sincerely, Dan Wise Natasha Sourova 4436 Dunham Drive - Edina, MN 55435 Tel: 952- 832 -0696 z Heather Braniain M From: F Hanson <felhanson @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 14; 2014 4:11 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed multi -story structure at 72nd & France I am emailing to voice my concern regarding this new redevelopment project on the corner of 72nd and France. As a neighbor living on the southern part of West Shore.Drive; I frequently use 72nd to exit the neighborhood. This size of this development seems complete, y:':unrealistic for the neighborhood. The amount of traffic in general, and cut -thro traffic in particular, is .a great concern for the area. I trust a project of this size on this corner will never receive city council approval. Felicity Hanson 7457 West Shore Drive 1 .Heather Branigin From: John Dolejsi <JDolejsi @CareMinders.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:11.13M To: Cary Teague; Edina Mail Cc: marydolejs @aol.com Subject: Re: 7200 France Ave redevelopment project My wife and I are 28 year residents of the Edina Cornelia community. We have raised 4 children in this area at 7216 Cornelia Drive. We have started several businesses in Edina including one that was located at 7200 France Ave building for years. We are VERY opposed to the massive scale of this project and the impact on the safety and character of our�community. The density, size and types of use will generate a massive increase in traffic and put all.of our children at risk. How many casualties and fatalities would this increased traffic cause in the closely situated elementary school, church, residential are and at France Ave which is already overwhelmed in this area. The city went thru this same problem with a far more modest proposal directly across 72nd Street which was 1/2 the size of this proposal and it was scaled back in size and traffic impact to the Sunrise Building. The Byerly's project will be increasing local traffic shortly. Perhaps this massive proposal is intended to push so far that a. significant scale back is what the developers already expect. We strongly request keeping the current Cities Comprehensive Plan unaltered. Including the 4 story maximum height, housing density maximum of 30/ acre and floor area ratio of 0.5. Please keep us safe and let.us maintain a quality of life.Edina has stood for. Please read this email at tomorrows City Council meeting on this matter.. John and Mary Dolejsi 7216 Cornelia Drive Edina Cell 612.845.5845 Heather Branigin From: Joe Dalsin <jdalsin @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed project at 7200 France Ave. Dear Cary Teague, I am very concerned with the proposed project at 7200 France Ave for a 6 stories apartment complex. I'm a home owner in the Cornelia neighborhood. This project appears to be much too large and will have an adverse impact on our neighborhood. The traffic on 70th and other streets around Cornelia elementary school is already too high. Adding 195 rental units to this area is not appropriate or safe for the school children that walk to school nearby. I'm also very displeased to see that the city council is entertaining this proposal. It violates a number of provisions in the Edina comprehensive plan. Not only is the density of the project inappropriate for the area but height of 6 stories does not fit with the existing structures in the area. Another concern is the entrance on to France Ave from 72nd The recent reconfiguration of that intersection allows one to turn south onto fiance from 72. Northbound traffic to France from 72nd will have to route through the residential neighborhood. Overall this project is much too large and is not remotely scaled like anything else in the immediate area. As a resident of Edina and the Cornelia neighborhood I oppose this project as planned and request greater transparency and full public comment before the city approves this project any further. Sincerely, Joe Dalsin 7312 Wooddale Ave S Edina, MN 55435 612- 964 -2285 Heather Braniain From: Mathews <srmathew015 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:05 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 6 story rental/retail proposal Cary, Please present my email to the council and forward a copy to the planning commission. Your plan for a 6 story'rentaUretail project on 72nd,andFrance is terrible. The project is too dense and would create way too much traffic for our residential. area . I cart believe you would even consider this plan . We have enough retail and rental. In our area already Sue Mathews 7404 West Shore Drive Edina Sent from my iPhone 1 From: Kayla Wright [mailto:kaylamlw @ aol.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:58 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Development at 72nd and France This email is written in opposition to the apartment/condo development planned for the office building space at 72nd and France. As It Is, the increase in Apartment /Condo dwellings in the immediate Southdale area is going to put too much of a burden on the France /Xerxes /66th /Hazelton area. Additionally, the proposed building that is going Into effect in the Pentagon business park is Immense. The additional OVERAGE of expected apartment/condos proposed for the 72nd and France space is, in my opinion, not necessary and will directly effect the safety of our Cornelia neighborhood. Just having this complex built changes the make -up of our quiet and well- connected community. Our neighbors chose the Cornelia area for: Quiet and family friendly atmosphere and amenities Child safe streets with limited traffic and easy access to the Cornelia Parks and streets Family atmosphere that directly impacts participation in our children's school, which in turn, enhances our student experience. At the very least: This would greatly affect traffic flow in the neighborhood. Any resident at the apartment complex, potentially —200 with the proposed increase in size from the original development pitched to the City Council, wanting to travel north on France would have to first drive east on 72nd, as there is no left turn option at 72nd and France. Those wanting to get to Hwy 100 would then likely go to Cornelia Drive and then to 70th. This is right by Cornelia Elementary. This proposed building AND increase is in NO WAY beneficial for the residence of our Cornelia neighborhood. Regards, Kayla M. Wright 7309 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 952 - 426 -1377 Kayla Wright 6.12-396-1848 Heather Branigin From: Sue-Soule <sulb3so @comcast.net> Sent Monday, July 14, 2014 3:57 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: FW: Proposed six -story complex at 72nd and France Dear Mr. Teague, I am resubmitting the letter below as several people who have seen it have asked if their names could be added in support. Thank you, Sue Soule From: Sue Soule rmailto:suMso(ftomcast. net l Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 9:26 PM To: 'cteague @edinamn.gov' Subject: Proposed six -story complex at 72nd and France PLEASE FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dear Mr. Teague: I would like to say that this latest proposal is unbelievable but, unfortunately, it is part of an ugly pattern of total disregard for the residents of this area and its history. Has anyone on the City Council or Planning Commission read the Comprehensive Plan lately? Or the traffic study on which they based the changes to France Avenue which stated that traffic was already at level E, which does not stand for excellent but quite the opposite? The proposed project at 72nd and France would be laughable in its effrontery were it not for the fact that our city leaders are taking it seriously. It exceeds current density, height and floor area ratio restrictions. In the words of former Edina Planning Commissioner Julie Risser in regard to a previous development proposal: "I think it will leave many residents of Edina wondering what their city code means.. Is it something that will be there next week or next month? This is something we should honor." Lest you think we're being petty, during the time my husband and I have been tax- paying residents of Edina, there have been: Expansions of Southdale Expansions.of Galleria Expansions of Fairview Southdale and nearby medical buildings and new medical buildings Centennial Lakes retail, housing and five office buildings The Westin Hotel and condo high -rise The apartment building at 69th and York The One Southdale complex The three buildings on the Byerly's property The in- process Wickes /Borofka site The City Council has adopted "density" as a community value, but I would like to see what would happen if that were put to a city referendum. The Edina residents I know did not move here because they wanted to be downtown, Uptown or Eden Prairie East. They wanted quiet residential neighborhoods with good schools and parks. I think this area of Edina has borne more than its share of growth. If the city commissioners and council members want to ride roughshod over character, codes and comprehensive plan, then let's spread the wealth around. Let's put an 18 -story high -rise on the old public works site and put a housing development around Bredesen Park. I thought our City Council was supposed to represent our residents, not every developer that comes courting. Sincerely, Susan Soule and Gary Soule West Shore Drive Susan Jean Smith 7308 West Shore Drive Beverly Moore 7304 West Shore Drive Al Corcoran 7316 West Shore Drive Richard and Betty Johnson 7328 West Shore Drive Sally Scheefe and John Walters 7200 York Avenue South Lisa Schunn 7320 West Shore Drive Alice Scheefe 1002 Coventry Place Susan Scheefe 709 Coventry Lane Heather Branigin . From: srbinius @comcast:net Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:46 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Project at France Avenue and 72nd Street We want to express our concern to the City Council and Edina Planning Commission over the proposed development at France Avenue and 72nd Street. It will add a good deal of traffic to both France Avenue and 72nd-Street. This would not only be a disruption for the residents closest to the project but, more importantly, a safety concern for the children at the Cornelia school close by. The rental /retail development may be acceptable but the massive size of it is not. The most disturbing aspect of this proposal is that the Edina Planning Commission has.given a positive response to it. We understand it is considerably larger than is allowed in the comprehensive plan that the City has in place. We have been impressed by how dedicated Edina seems to be in preserving the quality of life here yet it appears that the developer is pulling strings,to make a big profit and the City now doesn't care quite so much about its plan or the quality of life of its residents. If this project goes forward, please limit its size to an attractive and reasonable size for the neighborhood. David and Shirley Binius 4432 Ellsworth Drive Edina N Heather Braniqin From: Chris Victorsen < cherishedstitches @earthlink:net> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:46 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Dear Mr. Teague, S NO writing'to you today to express our opposition to the proposed project at 7200 Frande Ave. The propposed project is too big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential area and will add too much traffic to an overburdened France Ave and to residential streets.which,also connect to an .elementary school. This project also far exceeds what is allowed according to Edina's Comprehensive Plan. Please let the City Council know of opposition to this massive project by presenting this email to the Council on 7/15 and forwarding a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you, Christine AVictorsen 7213 Corneliabrive 1 Heather Braniain From: Linda Conley <lindalconley @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:36 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 72nd and France project I am writing to voice my opinion that this project will ruin our neighborhood and cause even more congestion than we already deal with on France. Now you propose on the corner of France and 72nd? Those of us.who live near this intersection should consider moving away if this goes through. How much more do businesses and rental properties have to encroach on homes in a so far quiet neighborhood? This is not progress. Thank you for listening and taking action, Linda Conley 7311 Glouchester Dr. 1 Heather Braniain From: Bette Anderson <betteanderson @yahoo,com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:08 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Avenue Rental/Retail Project - 72nd & France Mr. Teague, I am a,resident of Edina and reside in a neighborhood west of France Avenue and just south of West 70th Street on Poppy Lane. ,This email wiltserve as my firm objection to the proposed 72nd & France rental /retail " project. I first learned of the 72nd & France rental /retail project just yesterday from a neighbor.. Needless to -say, I was appalled by,the' immensity, intrusiveness and inappropriateness relative to the surrounding neighborhoods. It will create undue. traffic .problems on an already overburdened France Avenue as well as creating additional"_;. travel difficulty for the neighborhood residents, not to mention potential attendant problems such as noise, private property violations, criminal activity, etc. This project is also in very close proximity to an elementary school which has been couched within a peaceful, stable neighborhood environment which would undoubtedly be fundamentally altered by the proposed project. The safety and protection of the children should be of primary importance and should be the number one consideration in the decision - making process regarding this mammoth, overly ambitious project. I -would ask that my email be presented to the City Council on Tuesday with a copy forwarded to the Planning Commission. Thank you for your attention and consideration. Bette Anderson 4936 Poppy Lane Edina, MN 55435 952- 486 -8834 Heather Branigin From: Gary Hudson <ghudson4034 @gmaii.com> Sent: Monday, July 14,12014 3:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Please present my,e -mail to City Council regarding my opposition to 72nd & France project Dear Mr. Teague, My name is Gary A. Hudson, 4512 Belvidere Lane, Edina, MN 55435 =4034. My phone is 952 -929- 0634 ghudson4034@gmail.com I use 72nd daily as I turn off France at 72nd and head west to reach Belvidere Lane. Traffic is already very heavy on France. Daily I turn off France from the north bound lane, using the left turn lane, and turning across southbound traffic on France when oncoming vehicles are not present. Without the proposed project, traffic is already heavy and waiting is involved to cross over France onto 72nd. I viewed the presentation of this project before the Planning Committee. I am opposed to this oversized six story project of 195 apartments and two restaurants. I am opposed to amendments to the comprehensive plan, including the increased housing density. I am absolutely opposed to the massive six story structure that is proposed. It will add greatly to the already increasing traffic on France (and 72nd) because of so,many proposed additional residents and two commercial enterprises, the restaurants. There are already so many condo and apartment buildings being constructed, in the vicinity of France and York. Some have not yet started construction. Residents for these structures are going to add greatly to the traffic in the area. Already far too much density has been approved. The impact on traffic'of all these new residents is unknown at this time. Certainly we do not need 195 more units, plus the added traffic from two new restaurants on the west side of France Avenue. We do not need all this, plus a massive building intruding into the west.on residential ;72nd Street. I ask the City Council to refuse amending the Comprehensive Plan for this huge structure. It is time that the City Council realize that already too much density has been approved. The Council should decide in favor of what is in the best interests of residents and neighborhoods instead of deciding in favor of an overzealous developer. I thank you and the City Council for considering and recognizing my opposition to this project that is inappropriate for the neighborhood west of France Avenue. Gary A. Hudson Heather Branigin From: Sally Stoutenburgh <sallystout @centurylink.net> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:04 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposal for 7200 France Avenue Dear Director, I find it appalling that the Planning Commission would give an encouraging response to the proposed monstrosity being considered at the corner of72 "d and France Avenue. Has the City's tax revenue become more important than the citizen's quality of life? They should build this in a community that has more open spaces and fewer congested roads. The last time a proposal this far outside the regulations was approved, it ended in a lawsuif-and the City of Edina lost. Nobody wants to go down that road again. Thank you, Sally Stoutenburgh 7449 W Shore Dr Edina, MN 55435 Q This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. . 1 Heather Branigin From: Ryan Siemers Photo +Design <rps @ryansiemers.com> sent: Monday,_ July 14, 2014 3:00 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: W72nd and France Community development Dir. Cary Teague, I'm a local resident, architectural designer, filmmaker, and photographer. Apparently I need to be paying more attention to what's happening with local development. I received an urgent notice today from a concerned citizen about the proposed development and France Avenue at 72nd. I have to agree that I'm a little concerned about the scale of this development. That isn't to say that it couldn't be successful for both the city of you Edina and the residents. There really three concerns that I have. The scale, the traffic pattern, and the use. I do like the reduction in scale as the building moves west into the residential neighborhood. However I feel as though the development is trying to push the boundaries a little bit too far for the west side of the street. On the plus side, I like that the design is presumably making the best use of the dramatic grade change that already existing (for underground parking that would meet the capacity needed for any retail and residential needs). I do believe that IF this_ project wants to have six stories, it should be limited to France Avenue and drop down as soon as it turns to the west. Perhaps the exception of that would be the corner of France and 72nd until it meets the curb cut. I am concerned that they may not be going far enough to limit traffic going to the west on 72nd. It is a busy(ish) collector road at the moment and I can easily imagine residents taking 72nd to Cornelia over to 70th to get to hwy 100. That traffic needs to be directed to flow on France. I would suggest One way in and out of the parking lot, with a right turn only median to dissuade use of 72nd as a route for commuters. I'm concerned about more temporary (apartment) housing in this district - of Edina. 'Pd be more in support of this project if it were more condominiums then apartments. With the developments going up on the Byerly's site I feel as though we need to balance permanent versus apartment housing. Additionally, condominium residents bring more of a sense of personal and community investment that I think would be needed by the time this goes in. Certainly more than 13% of this current development. Lastly I am thrilled that they are dedicating 20% of their units to affordable housing! I'd hope to see a good mix of unit sizes. Perhaps something like 1/4. studios, 1/4 one BR, 1/4 two BR and 1/4 three BR. We defmitely don't have enough 2 and 3 BR units in this area to support working class families. I'd like to attend tomorrow evening's city hall meeting, however Pll be currently on a photo shoot. I will however look forward to seeing what the results were from the evening's meeting. Sincerely, Ryan Siemers ASMP I Associate AIA I. LEED AP Filmmaker I-� Photographer I Designer 0. 612- 246 -4627. M. 612 -386 -7457 . E. r�s(�.iyansiemers.com W. ryansiemers.com 12 Long' Lake Rd. Suite. 17B St. Paul. -;MN 55115 Sent from my Whone Heather Branigin From: Kathy'Diaby. <KDiaby @tdhcd.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 2:59 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed 6 -story development at France and 72nd Dear,Mr. Teague, As a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood, I am very concerned about the proposed six -story rental /retail project at France and 72 "d: This project is too big for the space; i I inappropriate for a residential neighborhood and will add too much traffic to an already congested France Avenue. The - density and height of this project far exceed the City's comprehensive plan. Our City Council should be looking out for the interests of its residents and not some overzealous developer. Haven't they learned their lesson with the repurposing.of the Fred Rich ards;Golf Course? They need to start acting on our behalf or there will be no re- elections. Kathy Diaby I Managing Partner MOW Hell* g Y 600 Hi Highway 169 Suite 1960) Minneapolis) MN) 55426 Ii+on Direct- (763) 358 -4503 Fax: (763) 354 -7045 (Main: (763)545 -2353 �t7odg� irk tRs &,Actors. www.tdhcd.com Click Here for Personal and Company Profiles "Relationship Driven" The information contained in this a -mail rnessage is privileged and confidential infor,rration Intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the Intended recipient., you are hereby on notice that you are in possession of confidential and privileged irrfonnation. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us Immediately. This notice is required by IRS Circular 230, which regulates written communications about federal tax matters between tax advisors and their clients. To the extent the preceding correspondence and or any attachment is a written tax advice communication, it is not a full "covered opinion ". Accordingly, this advice is not intended and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be Imposed by the IRS. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email message, including attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 -2521, and forthe sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender by phone or reply via email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. 1 - - -- Original Message---- - From: Peterson, Jason Imailto•iason petersonCa)metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 2:51 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Hello Cary, I hope you are having a good day. I've been following the Fred Richards redevelopment but somehow missed 7200 France rezoning until this week. I see it has a pledge of 39 affordable units out of the 212 total for the city and was wondering how many units were included in the developments in the NW corner of York and 69th (Southdale Parking Lot) and the SE corner of Hazelton and France (Byerly's Redevelopment)? Second, as an SE Edina Resident I also wanted to go on record as voting for shorter buildings and better traffic patterns through the city. Whatever the driving force has been behind the numerous zoning variances on height restrictions over the past few years, especially the upcoming 7200 France I am opposed. Aside from the skyline changes, France (South of 69th) has,always served as a nice separator between high paced commercial and taller buildings and the quaint residential neighborhood of Cornelia. I would vote for keeping the development to a 4 story maximum please. And trying to get in and out of Byerly's from the west (aside from the construction) has become incredibly difficult. Cornelia seems to be the elementary school that is the home for the rental market portion of Edina. Kind of some ramblings but I wanted to be added to the list of those who oppose this rampant overdevelopment of SE Edina. Thanks, Hope to see you tomorrow at the Council Meeting, Jason From: William Togstad I'mailto:wtogstad @ comcast.netl Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 2:38 PM, To: Cary Teague Subject: Six -story France Avenus rental /retail project in Edina Dear Cary As a 30 year residents of Edina, my wife Ruth and I strongly object to a project of this magnitude being placed at France Avenue and West 72nd Street. If a project of this scale is allowed to go forward in will end up hurting Edina for years to come. The problems may not occur right away, but anyone who has traveled extensively in the US knows full well what the 2007 -2012 real estate crash did to local communities across the Southwest US, parts of California and much of Florida. Any developer can always be counted on to respond to artificially low interest rates as a means of leveraging their capital for even greater inflation adjusted real returns on building projects; the economic viability or lack of it simply is of no concern to them. Moreover, the ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) currently being pursued"by the Federal Reserve is little more than a desperate attempt to rescue a Weak economy. The banks in China have been doing the same thing and the result has been historic overbuilding in China and high vacancy rates as shown on a recent 60 minutes television program. Anyone with any financial sense at all can see what will happen when this latest artificial real estate boom busts. The community will have record high vacancies and what amounts of a real estate white; elephant on their hands will little to no property tax returns for local schools. We beg you to not drag our community into this property boom that is being fueled by little more than ill- advised speculation. We are retired now and still support the school system. However, we are mobile at this point and we may consider relocating entirely given the overbuilding. that we see taking place. Bill and Ruth Togstad 4908 Aspasia Lane Edina, MN . E I From:.blairchristie fmailto :blairsc(abgooglemail.coml Sent:' Monday, July 14, 2014 4:34 PM To: Cary Teague. Subject: 72nd and France Development I am a resident of 7316 Cornelia drive in Edina. A flyer was dropped off at our doorstep detailing the development of 72nd and France area. I found this concerning. .,Mostly I'm concerned with the added burden to the infrastructure. I understand the elementary school nearby is beyond overflowing, and traffic on'France and the area is concerning on a good day. I would like to voice my opinion that if facts are as stated in this flyer, I am opposed to this new development being 6 stories, the occupancy and number of units and various other details. Thanks, Blair Christie 7316 Cornelia Drive_ Edina, MN 55435 Heather Braniain From: Ruth McIntyre <irmcintyre @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:28 PM To: josh @joshsprague.com; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Proposed 7200 France Ave Development Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are deeply concerned about the development proposal for the 7200 France Avenue site. We do not support the proposed development because of the impact that it will have on the Comelia neighborhood to the west, and the impact it will have on the traffic on France Ave. Concerns that we have about.this proposal: 1. Height: The increased height will not fit with the neighborhood to the west. The current property keeps the height next to France Ave. and it isn't as high as this development proposes. With Byerly's new development encroaching close to France Avenue, and this proposed development being so high close to France Avenue, it will not be long before we are driving through a canyon of high rises along France Avenue. 2. Landscaping: We fear that the mature trees on the west of the property and the lilac bushes to the north will be lost in the development further exposing the rest of the neighborhood to the density. Also, we note that virtually none of the developments in the Southdale/Hazelton area in the last few years have come close to planting the number of trees around the developments that were shown in the plan/pictures. We feel that we have been misled in many instances. We as a city must insist that any new development be provided with an adequate number of trees, not just saplings, to.fit in with our community: one of the things that most impressed me as a newcomer to Edina was the number of mature trees along 700' Street. We should vigorously promote the use of trees and plants in landscaping around new developments, and not let developers off the landscaping hook lightly. 3. Density and traffic: The increased density will cause worsening traffic issues and noise for the neighborhood and France Avenue. The main entry into the proposed development is off 72°d Street, which means that the traffic will inevitably:' spill into the South Cornelia neighborhood and will potentially cause safety issues for children and those of us who walk the neighborhood. We often see cars speeding on 72nd Street, and this problem will only get worse with increased traffic on it: The proposed development will also increase the traffic on France Avenue, which is already overburdened. In addition, the space for car parking at the restaurants on France Avenue seems inadequate. The entry to the parking is too close to the intersection of France and 72nd, and runs the risk of backing up into the intersection. 4. Stormwater: The property is low and during times of heavy rain you can see water flooding the southwest comer of the parking lot. It may be difficult to drain or control the water runoff. Right now it is a parking lot. As it stands, there is minimal damage when it floods because there are no structures there. The placement of structures to the low lying areas will not only expose the structures to the risk of flood but will also exacerbate the problem of flooding. 5. Sewer: More density puts more waste into the sewer system. We are concerned that the sewer system is not made to support this increased residential density. 6. Restaurants: Restaurants at this site are not in character with this part of the neighborhood. We have wonderful restaurant choices on the east side of France Ave. and there is no need to have them encroaching into the Cornelia neighborhood. Restaurants will bring traffic and noise, including noise from background music outdoors and trash pickup services, and will increase the amount of light impinging on the neighborhood at night. What is worse, the restaurant noise and traffic will occur in the evening hours, when families are more likely to the walking the neighborhood and at times when people are trying to sleep. 7. Property values of neighboring houses: It is 'impossible to conceive that the values of the houses in the immediate . vicinity of the proposed site will not fall if the proposed development goes ahead. Nobody wants-.to..lose the privacy of their backyard to a multi -story development across the'backyard fence,'_ While:the current site will not win any prizes for its aesthetics, the density of the proposed project will overpower the east end of 72nd Street and will make the properties close to it less desirable. 8. The proposal requires too many zoning changes: The proposed project does not meet setback requirements, height requirements, housing density requirements or floor area requirements. That the developer has proposed a project that requires so many zoning changes suggests to us that they have no interest in maintaining the neighborhood, and have no regard for those in the'neighborhood whom it will affect. The city should deny permission for this project based on the proposed increased density alone. 9. School overcrowding: Cornelia Elementary is already overcrowded as it is, compared to other elementary schools in Edina,.and will have to absorb children,not only from this proposed development but also from the apartments in the new Byerly's development. We are concerned that this increase in student population will adversely affect the school. For these reasons, the City should reject the proposed development for.this site. Please listen to your constituents in this matter, for it is they who will sustain Edina as a great city to live and it is they who should be guiding the development of the city. Cordially, Ruth McIntyre Iain McIntyre 2 Heather Branigin From: Hein de Hoog <hein @manufacturingsales,com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:32 PM To: Cary Teague; Edina Mail; jonibennetl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: 72nd and France developement Ladies and Gentleman, I want to weigh in on the development that is being discussed at 72 "d and France. I have no interest in nor believe citizens have the right to stop a development just because they don't like it in their neighborhood. That being said, I don't like the proposed development at 72nd and France. I also believe variances should be issued under certain circumstances. Extreme hardship or should a zoning law be changed AFTER someone owning property and bought it for a certain intention that they will no longer be able to do. Also perhaps for small issues such as a higher fence,-should someone have a neighbor they'can't get along with. Or perhaps the size of a home, should many of the other homes in:the neighborhood or block be oversized. Etc. Sq my point is this; I don't believe we:can stop someone from buying the property at 72"d.and France and developing it to whatever the CURRENT law allows them to do. And, if they want to move a building 3 feet closer to a lot line in order to obtain a certain configuration, or some other insignificant variance, then issue it. However, DO NOT allow major changes to the sight unless the neighborhood stands behind it. If I read the propaganda correctly, then the developer is looking to add two stories to the building, a fifty percent increase from current zoning and more units per acre etc. etc. Please hold the developer to what the current - zoning standards are; .This is owed to the neighborhood. I can go on for along time about traffic to. the area, through the neigh borhood,,.home values etc etc again. Please, do the right and fairthirig. Hein de Hoog Property owner in the 72nd and France area Heather Branigin From: Katie Hardy <kdhardy40 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday,July 14, 2014 8:23 PM to: Edina Mail Subject: support for 66 West project I urge you to approve the zoning changes necessary to make it possible for Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative to build and provide housing for young adults experiencing homelessness in Edina and other Southwest communities. 3330 W. 66th St. is an ideal location for this facility as it is close to public transportation and many job opportunities close by. 66 West is a brilliant concept of concern and care for young adults who have lost their way. I am a resident of Edina, and a member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, one of the co- sponsors of this project. It would create an opportunity for the City of Edina to show forward thinking,and leadership;. sincerely, Katharine D. Hardy 1 Heather Braniqin From: Laurits Nielsen <Inielsen0427 @yahoo.cbm> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:28 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: dbonlender @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: 66 West Housing Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, My wife, Rev, Mary Ellen Nielsen and I, Rev. Laurits Nielsen, write to.you in support of Beacon Interfaith Housing's 66 West project. We are retired United Methodist Clergy who are member of Good Samaritan United Methodist Church of Edina and live in Golden Valley at 24 Maddaus Lane, Golden Valley, MN. I have been a part of supportive housing for those in need since 1993. _ 1 was a part of Simpson Housing Services as a board member and participanf in volunteering for 20 years.,, IAnow the part that such housing can play in the rebuilding of a life. I also know of the heartbreak of young persons forced on the streets during-their teen years. These people become vulnerable to violence and trafficing. Often homelessness for the young comes from conflict around many things in the home that suddenly turns inhospitable -- coming out-in orientation, excessive drinking or drugs by family members and other pressures. The most important thing a community can do is to provide a place for education and maturation to continue until the person is able to support themselves. At this time in the western and southwestern suburbs of Minneapolis there is a lack of such supportive community. Therefore, we urge that you support Beacon Interfaith Housing in their endeavor to provide 'a place for homeless teens that is near jobs, school, transportation, and away from a residential area that may object to their presence. Respectufully, Rev Laurits Nielsen 1 Heather Braniciin From: Mike Welb'aum <mwelbaum @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:59 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Inappropriate Development - France at 72nd Cary K. Teague, Community Development Manager Cc: Mayor Jim Hovland Dear Cary Teague, I am not 6ble.to attend the council meeting of July 15, 2014, but want to express both alarm and opposition to the inappropriate rental /retail project, 72nd and France. i Alarm due to lack of 'community involvement and,notification Opposition due to extreme departure from comprehensive plan Neighborhood tinkering to accommodate planned and agreed -to development can be affirming and constructive. Re- structuring. neighborhoods to satisfy selfish perspectives of future density needs violates the very foundation of a currently-healthy neighborhood; it will not contribute to Edina's unique role in the metropolitan area. Do not permit the plans to proceed. Mike Welbaum 7232 Monardo Lane Edina, Minnesota, 55435 1 Heather:,Branigin, From Gwen Budd <gwbudd @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 10:48, PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development of 7200 France Dear members of the City Council, I am a resident of the Cornelia, neighborhood and just became aware'of the proposed re- development of 7200 France from a letter to the editor in the July 10th edition of the Sun. Current. I then watched the Planning Commision video of the Sketch Plan- review;for this project to learn more.Here are my concerns: Increased "Traffic:: l agree with Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder that traffic congestion, unsafe maneuvers (cutting across 3 lanes of traffic and /or U turns), and increased-traffic through the neighborhood and by Cornelia school will be a problem: I am already concerned about increased traffic from the addition of 246 apartments at the Byerly's site across the street from 7200 France, without adding traffic from,another 170 apartments and 25 town homes. There will also be increased traffic in the Southdale area from the addition of 232 units at One Southdale Place and the 242 units approved for the former Wickes Furniture site. A traffic study at this point will be very misleading because it will not reflect the increased traffic that will result from the 720 apartment units that have already been approved for construction in the Southdale area. Density: I understand that the 2008 Comprehensive Plan encourages mixed office and residential uses for this area, but this project goes beyond the height and density- standards currently in place and would require three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in terms of increased building height, increased density and increased floor area ratio. This project would also required rezoning. Commissioner Kevin Stanton pointed out that a building height of 6 stories is more than the Comprehensive Plan envisioned for the "shoulder" of the Southdale area. What value does the Comprehensive Plan have if we are not going to follow it? Sewer Capacity: Edina's 2008 Comprehensive Plan indicates that a higher density of residential and commercial development in the Southdale area will result in increased sanitary sewer flows, which may then require significant trunk line upgrades. Does Edina have sufficient sewer capacity? Schools: What is the projected increase for Edina Schools from all these additional residential units? While the project does have some nice features such as 39 units of affordable housing and underground parking, in my opinion it is too dense for the site. Thank you, Gwen Budd Heather Branigin From: Bill Bale <w.bale @yahoo.com> Sent Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:16 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartments /Beacon Interfaith To the Mayor of Edina and all Edina City Council Members From William Bale,5516 Vernon Avenue S, Edina, a resident of Edina since 1960. Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members Joni Bennett,Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson I support 66 West Apartments and Beacon Interfaith in their effort to secure approval for the construction and operation of a 39 unit apartment building for homeless youth. Over a period of 5 years operation, this facility will serve 130 youth. That is because Beacon has a program involving rules, work requirements and counseling that, on average, prepares a resident youth for unassisted living outside this facility 18 months after entering this facility. These are the results being obtained at Beacon's homeless youth apartments at 37th and Nicollet, which I learned when I personally toured that facility. That is a dynamic youth program. So you are not being asked to approve a building for static resident housing for homeless youth. Nor is this a "flop house for aimless, wandering youth. Beacon is an interfaith apartment developer. It has a proven track record of counseling and graduating young people to live a respectful, productive life at the rate of 39 souls every 18 months. And that is an amazing 130 souls every 5 years. Please approve this project. Thank you. - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Paul Felipe [rnailto:6ffeli6e@mac.com Sent: Monday, July 14, 201410:49 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Not in favor of proposed France Ave./W.72nd rental /retail project Good Evening Cary, 1'. wanted to write to voice our families many concerns with this impending project. As current residents of the Lake Edina area we feel that we would be impacted greatly with this possible addition. We can currently see all of the delays with construction and roadwork on this area of France, and with the new additions near Byerly's'and the Southdale area we can't even imagine how horrible more retail and housing will add to everythingi This project is far to big for the space, and will only create,future _ problems for we, the existing residents. We hope that you reconsider this project and help our area of Edina maintain it's current level of somewhat manageable congestion ............ the area just can't support anymore l Please forward a copy of this email to the planning commission, as well as present it to the Council the evening of 7/15/2014 @7pm. Respectfully Paul F. Felipe Blaine C. Caton. 4813 Hibiscus Avenue Edina, MN 55435 Sent from my, iPad PauI.F. Felipe From: Gwen Budd fmailto:gwbudd(a yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:48 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development of 7200 France Dear members of the City Council, I am a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood and just became aware of the proposed re- development of 7200 France from a letter to the editor in the July 10th edition of the Sun Current. I then watched the Planning Commision video of the Sketch Plan review for this project to:learn more.Here are my concerns: Increased. Traffic: I agree with Planning Commissioner Michael Schroeder that traffic congestion, unsafe maneuvers (cutting across 3 lanes of traffic and /or U turns), and Increased traffic through the neighborhood and by Cornelia school-will problem. I am already concerned about increased traffic from.the addition of 246 apartments.at --the Byerly's site,across the streeItfrom 7200 France, without adding traffic from another 170 apartments and 25 town homes. There will also be increased traffic in the Southdale area from the addition of 232 units at One Southdale Place and the 242 units approved for the former Wickes kFumiture site. A traffic study at this point will tie very misleading,because it will not reflect the increased traffic that will result from,the 720 apartmentunits that have already been approved for construction in the Southdale area. Density: I understand that the 2008 Comprehensive Plan encourages mixed office and residential uses for this area, but this project goes beyond the height and'density standards currently in place: and would require three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in terms of increased building height, .iricreased density and increased floor area ratio. This project would also required rezoning. Commissioner Kevin Stanton pointed out that a building height of 6 stories is more than the Comprehensive Plan envisioned for the "shoulder" of the Southdale area. What value does the Comprehensive Plan have if we are not going to follow it? Sewer Capacity: Edina's 2008 Comprehensive Plan indicates that a higher density of residential and commercial development in the Southdale area will result in increased sanitary sewer flows, which may then require'significant trunk line upgrades. Does Edina have sufficient sewer capacity? Schools: What is the projected increase for Edina Schools from all these additional residential units? While the project does have some nice features such as 39 units of affordable housing and underground parking, in my opinion it is too dense for the site. Thank you, Gwen Budd From: Paige Norwood Finailtopaige d norwood@hotmail com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:28 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Avenue apartment project Dear Cary, We are writing to you regarding 7200 France Avenue apartment /retail project proposed by DJR Arch itectu re/Boiscl air Corp /NHH Properties. As a member of the community with a young family (3 kids and growing), we feel it is inappropriate for our quiet and personal..residential neighborhood. Currently,.there are already three large apartment complexes under planning or development in the neighborhood. The France avenue commercial infrastructure and the surrounding neighborhood roadways are maxed out. The thought of adding still another residential development project of any scale is simply untenable. We do not support the construction of additional multi -unit residence at the at the 7200 France Ave site. Please present our concerns to the Council on Tuesday and also forward a copy of this email to the Planning Commission. Regards, Andrew & Paige Misselt 7104 Heatherton Trail Edina MN 55435 Heather Branigin From: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:23 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: proposed redevelopment for France & 72nd Cary Teague, Community Development Director. 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 952- 826 -0236 cteaeue EdinaMN.eov www.EdinaMN.gov /PIanhine ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Jean Holm (mailto:iholm921 @email.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:55 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: proposed redevelopment for France & 72nd Dear Cary, I am writing in opposition of the proposed development on France & 72nd St. I live just west of France Ave and have for the past 20 years. This area is already so congested and my little Belvidere Lane is already a pass through for people wanting to get to France Ave from Hwy 100 without driving on 70th.. I can't even comprehend the traffic issues this will cause and with all the apartments already in the area and more to come on the Southdale property! just don't understand the need for such major developments. Please, I ask for your reconsideration. I thank you for your time. Jean Holm Sent from my Wad 1 From: maureen glover fmalito :maureenlglover(ag_mail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 9:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Rental Project at 7200 France Ave: Mr. Teague, My husband and I live at 4440 Claremore Drive. We are extremely, concerned about the size of the rental project planned for 7200 France Ave which is at the end of our street. We have lived here since 1995. We moved here from a neighborhood we loved in South Minneapolis because we were directly located in extremely noisy flight.paths of MSP airport that became intolerable. We chose this neighborhood because it was a beautiful and quiet residential neighborhood to raise our children in and we are now looking.forward to enjoying many years here in our retirement. We continually work on our house, our yard and our gardens because we love to spend time here. We enjoy the close proximity to businesses, parks and restaurants in the Southdale area. We were relieved when the plans to make 70th Street a major thoroughfare in the middle of our residential neighborhood were changed to accomodate the wishes- and needs of the homeowners and the elementary school which is also on our street. The Cornelia neighborhood is already bordered just a block south of 72nd Ave with numerous large apartment complexes and businesses. We feel the size of this high density living project will negatively impact the quality of life and values of homes in our immediate neighborhood. The traffic alone on our residential street will be devastating to our community. To me, a project of this size on such a small parcel of land only reflects greed and prosperity for land owners and developers at the expense of the quality of life of the residents of this established residential area Their is an apartment building on the other side of Sunrise Estates that fits in aesthetically with the homes in the area. It is an appropriate size building for the space it occupies so it blends in with the neighborhood. I do not support this ostentatious crowding of "luxury" apartments and businesses in our community. We are extremely concerned and disappointed to hear that this is even being considered. Your consideration is appreciated. Maureen Glover - - - -- Original Message---- - From: MWB Gmail [mailto:brummmw @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:19 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Project to big The proposed project at France and 72nd is too big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood , and will add too much traffic to the already overburdened France avenue and our neighborhood with its nearby elementary school. Please present my email to the Council on(Tuesday and forward a copy to the planning Commission Thank you Matt Brumm E M - - -- Original Message--- - From: Lori Gmail [mailto:bgrebil @email.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:00 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France ave project My husband and I feel very strongly that if this project has to proceed then it definitely should be limited to four stories. Please present this email to the council tomorrow night and forward it to the planning commission. Sincerely, Lori and Bill Prebil 4504 Claremore court Sent from my iPhone Heather Branigin From: Connie Dosen <dosen08l2 @.aol.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:56 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six Story France Ave. Rental Attn. Mr. Teague - -This project (Six Story France Ave. Rental) is too big for the space, is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood, and will add to an'already overburdened France`Ave`. and our neighborhood with Cornelia Elementary School so close by. Please present this e-mail to the Council on Tuesday and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. Thank you, Mrs. Don Dosen- -7036 Kellogg Ave. So. -- Edina, MN 55435 -4141 i Heather.,Branigin From: P R EVANS <zevans4 @msn.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:37 PM To. Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France project " Dear Mr Teague, We have.lived at 7111 Heatherton Trail for almost 24 years. We have recently heard ( from neighbors, not the city which is disconcerting) that a proposal has been made regarding the building of a massive apartment /retail project at 7200 France Avenue. We are strongly opposed to this. The sca "le of this is way too large for our residential neighborhood . We are aware that the city would have to amend its comprehensive plan in terms of building height, housing density and floor area ratio. This is not acceptable for the neighborhood. The Cornelia neigh borhoodis a strong community centered around Cornelia Elementary School which is only a few blocks from the proposed development. The safety concerns are obvious. Seventeen children live on our block alone. There has never been an motor vehicle accident involving a child on our street ( nor any other type of accident) in the 23+ years we have lived here. The cut - though traffic this project would create would jeopardize the safety of our children, the students at Cornelia Elementary, as well as all residents. The Cornelia neighborhood, which is a very connected, close neighborhood would clearly be negatively impacted in a number'of ways, likely in ways the City planners are unable to anticipate at this time: Proceeding with this project is foresighted and not in the best interests of the neighborhood community. Please strongly consider these issues and input from your residents and constituents as -you make your decisions. Please present this e-mail to the Council at the Tuesday meeting (July 15th) and forward a copy to the Planning Commission. 'Sincerely, Patricia Evans and Paul Zelubowski 7111 Heatherton Trail Edina Sent from my iPad Heather Branigin From: Hein de Hoog <hein @manufacturingsales.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:32 PM To: Cary Teague; Edina Mail; jonibennetl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: 72nd and France developement Ladies and Gentleman, I want to weigh in on the development that is being discussed at 72nd and France. I have no interest in nor believe citizens have the right to stop a development just because they don't like it in their neighborhood. That being said, I don't like the proposed development at 72nd and France. I also believe variances should be issued under certain circumstances. Extreme hardship or should a zoning law be changed AFTER someone owning property and bought it for a certain intention that they will no longer be able to do. Also perhaps for small issues such as a higher fence, should someone have a neighbor they can't get along with. Or perhaps the size of a home, should many of the other homes in the neighborhood or block be oversized. Etc. So my point is this; I don't believe we can stop someone from buying the property at 72nd and France and developing it to whatever the CURRENT law allows them to do. And, if they want to move a building 3 feet closer to a lot line in order to obtain a certain configuration, or some other insignificant variance, then issue it. However, DO NOT allow major changes to the sight unless the neighborhood stands behind it. If I read the propaganda correctly, then the developer is looking to add two stories to the building, a fifty percent increase from current zoning and more units per acre etc. etc. Please hold the developer to what the current zoning standards are. This is owed to the neighborhood. I can go on for a long time about traffic to the area, through the neighborhood, home values etc etc again. Please, do the right and fair thing. Hein de Hoog Property owner in the 72nd and France area Heather Branigin From: Ruth McIntyre <irmdhtyre @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 14,2014 7:21 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed 7200 Frarice Ave Development Dear Mr. Teague: We are deeply concerned about the development proposal for the 7200 France Avenue site. We do not support the proposed development because of the impact that it will have on the Cornelia neighborhood to the west, and the impact it will have on the traffic on France Ave. Concerns that we have about this proposal: 1. Height: The increased height will not fit with the neighborhood to the west. The.current property keeps the height next to France Ave. and it isn't as high as this development proposes. With Byerly's new development encroaching close to France Avenue, and this proposed development being so high close to France Avenue, it will not be long before we are driving through a canyon of high rises along France Avenue. 2. Landscaping: We fear that the mature trees on the west of the property and the lilac bushes .to the north will be lost in the development further exposing the rest of the neighborhood to the density. Also, we note that virtually none of the developments in the Southdale/Hazelton area in the last few years have come close to planting the number of trees around the developments that were shown in the plan/pictures. We feel that we have been misled in many instances. We as a city must insist that any new development be provided with an adequate number of trees, not just saplings, to fit in with our community: one of the things that most impressed me as a newcomer to Edina'was the number of mature trees along 7& Street. We should vigorously promote the use of trees and plants in landscaping around new developments, and not let developers off the landscaping hook lightly. 3. Density and traffic: The increased density will cause worsening traffic issues and noise for the neighborhood and France Avenue. The main entry into the proposed development is off 72"d Street, which means that the traffic will inevitably spill into the South Cornelia neighborhood and will potentially cause safety issues for children and those of us who walk the neighborhood. We often see cars speeding on 72 °d Street, and. this problem will only get worse with increased traffic on it. The proposed development will also increase the traffic on France Avenue, which is already overburdened. In addition, the space for car parking at the restaurants on France Avenue seems inadequate. The entry to the parking is too close to the intersection of France and 72nd, and runs the risk of backing up into the intersection. 4. Stormwater: The property is low and during times of heavy rain you can see water flooding the southwest corner of the parking lot. It may be difficult to drain or control the water runoff. Right now it is a parking lot. As it stands, there is minimal damage when it floods because there are no structures there. The placement of structures to the low lying areas will not only expose the structures to the risk of flood but will also exacerbate the problem of flooding. 5. Sewer: More density puts more waste into the sewer system. We are concerned that the sewer system is not made to support this increased residential density. 6. Restaurants: Restaurants at this site are not in character with this part of the neighborhood. We have wonderful restaurant choices on the east side of France Ave. and there is no need to have them encroaching into the Cornelia neighborhood. Restaurants will bring traffic and noise, including noise from background music outdoors and trash pickup services, and will increase the amount of light impinging on the neighborhood at night. What is worse, the restaurant noise and traffic will occur in the evening hours, when families are more likely to the walking the neighborhood and at times when people are trying to sleep. 7. Property values of neighboring houses: It is impossible to conceive that the values of the houses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site will not fall if the proposed development goes ahead. Nobody wants to lose the privacy of their backyard to a multi -story development across the backyard fence. While the current site will not win any prizes for its aesthetics, the density of the proposed project will overpower the east end of 72nd Street and will make the properties close to it less desirable. 8. The proposal requires too many zoning changes: The proposed project does not meet setback requirements, height requirements, housing density requirements or floor area requirements. That the developer has proposed a project that requires so many zoning changes suggests to us that they have no interest in maintaining the neighborhood, and have no regard for those in the neighborhood whom it will affect. The city should deny permission for this project based on the proposed increased density alone. 9. School overcrowding: Cornelia Elementary is already overcrowded as it is, compared to other elementary schools in Edina, and will have to absorb children not only from this proposed development but also from the apartments in the new Byerly's development. We are concerned that this increase in student population will adversely affect the school. For these reasons, the City should reject the proposed development for this site. Please listen to your constituents in this matter, for it is they who will sustain Edina as a great city to live and it is they who should be guiding the development of the city. Cordially, Ruth McIntyre Iain McIntyre Heather. Branigin From: Grady St. Dennis <stdennis @gustavus'.edu> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Sketch plan for 7200 France Ave property Dear Mr. Teague, The purpose,•of this note is to voice our serious concern regarding what is being considered for the 7200 France Avenue property. We respect you'and appreciate your service to our city. We -ask that you please present this email to the Edina City Council tomorrow night and forward to the Planning Commission. The 7200 France Avenue parcel of land is not a proper location for such a massive complex and would require amending the existing comprehensive plan in ways that would not be beneficial for our Cornelia neighborhood. As a home owner in a neighborhood that'would be directly impacted by such';'development, we are disappointed to not have been notified in any way by our city that such-planning was under consideration, regardless of where in that process the consideration might be. Transparency is an important part of this civic relationship. There are alreadytoo many new high density construction projects underway in our neighborhood of which the actual impact upon area traffic and water /sewer demands are unknown. Even without taking the existing concerns into account, the proposed project is just too much and plainly demands more than the parcel of land and surrounding neighborhood can handle. Thank you for listening to our concerns. Sincerely, Grady & Angie St. Dennis 7005 Bristol Boulevard Edina, MN Heather Branigin From: Elizabeth Sarles <Elizabeth.Sarles @genmills.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:04 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: lien.sades @usbank.com; Elizabeth Sarles Subject: 7200 France Avenue Project Hello Mr. Teague — We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed mixed -use development project that will be built in our neighborhood. Two years ago, my husband and I choose Edina, and specifically the Cornelia neighborhood, as the place where we were going to buy our first home and raise our newly expanding family. The location was ideal for us as we are looking forward to sending our children to Cornelia elementary and the general peacefulness of the neighborhood. We also chose this location for the added bonus of the close proximity of the shops along France Avenue. While we are only a mile away from the Galleria, Southdale and myriad of restaurants, our neighborhood still maintains its peacefulness. That will no longer be the case if the proposal to build this development moves forward as it is located directly in our neighborhood. With a new apartment complex also being constructed across the, street at Byerly's, I simply do not understand how those potentially approving this complex would not think about the additional massive amount of traffic and congestion that will be added to our neighborhood and France Avenue. It is simply unacceptable. This is an inappropriate plan for a residential neighborhood. Please take our neighborhood into consideration when discussing these plans and consider looking out for the best interest of your current residents. We would appreciate you presenting our email and wishes to the council on Tuesday evening and please forward a copy of this email to the Planning Commission. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Lien & Elizabeth Sarles Heather Branigin From: Colleen Wolfe <colieenwolfe5 @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 5:54 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Wolfe, Willie Subject: 72nd Multi Use Development plan Dear Cary Teague - I am a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood in Edina and have heard of the proposed purchase and intent to re- develop the property on France Avenue at 72nd Street. The comprehensive plan would need to be amended to allow more than four stories, housing density from 30 units an acre to 50 and the floor -area ratio of 1.41 increased from today's 0.5. I live near the property location as well as the recent Byerlys' redevelopment, and I object to the density in each case. The congestion already experienced in foot and car traffic is already over its limits with out this unnecessary complex. We purchased in Cornelia for a quiet neighborhood where families can walk, bike; run, go to school with little traffic as experienced in the northern parts of Edina between France and HWY 100. This is not what I would like for my neighborhood. Adding another large brick and motor project is too invasive for a residential neighborhood in Edina that is tolerating the large projects as Southdale and Byerlys. I am not sure how this fits: into the a original Comprehensive Plan. This plan does not fit into the plan as I understand the original to be written. The types of residences that they both suggest are desirable and needed, but to densely populate an undersized property (72nd and France) "for such' a''complex mix of housing and the accompanying traffic represents a poor choice for this location. I will be attending Wednesday night meeting and look forward to support in denying this type of plan in my neighborhood. Colleen T. Wolfe, 4408 Gilford Drive 952- 250 -6669 . -1 Heather Branigin From: Sent To: Subject: Attachments: Dear Director Cary Teague, Benjamin Hackel <benhackel @gmail.com> Monday, July 14, 2014 5:31 PM Cary Teague 7200 France Avenue Development. Proposal 7200 France Avenue.pdf am a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina. I recently became aware of a proposed development at 7200 France Avenue. Several elements of the proposed plan cause me significant concern. The development would be visually` imposing; invasive to the strong residential neighborhood, and generate problematic vehicular traffic scenarios. .I _can appreciate the benefits of redevelopment, but these are outweighed by significant disadvantages resulting from the scale sand location of this particular project. I: believe that substantial modifications — or rejection — of the proposal are in the best interests of the city of Edina. My wife and I opted to move our family to our current.home because of the friendly, welcoming neighborhood ,feel sand the quality and proximity of Cornelia Elementary.'We appreciate the relative proximity of the entertainment and commercial options east of France Avenue, but we greatly value its delineated' separation from our neighborhood. The proposed project negatively impacts our neighborhood. The restrictions of 30 units per acre and 0.5 FAR were set for good. reason. The proposed plan does not merely break these restrictions; it grossly. exceeds them (50 and '1.4 or 1.3. depending on parking considerations). This dense population has an obvious motive that is, not consistet with the.. broad-, patient intentions of the Comprehensive Plan. While restrictions should always be considered in a context- dependent manner that allows exceptions as appropriate, variance does not seem consistent with the city's stated goals in this case. This projeCtr is directly contrary to the first objective, of the Comprehensive Plan;, "Maintain strong residential neighborhoods" and Land Use Goal 1 "Protect and preserve the essential character of existing residential neighborhoods." The impact of such a tall (80', six -story) structure hinders the neighborhood feel, especially at a common entrance to the neighborhood from points south and east. It also misses the mark on Land Use Goal 4: "Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character." The proposed project eliminates the transition zone between the single- family home Cornelia neighborhood and the commercial and commercial residential development east of France Avenue. It extends the vertical, large -scale redevelopment east of France Avenue to literal adjacency with single - family homes in the Cornelia neighborhood. The 'development guidelines' for future high - density residential (Comp. Plan 4 -27) are: "Provide incentives for updating older multifamily buildings" and "Work to create an attractive, pedestrian - friendly street edge and provide convenient access to transit, schools, parks, and other community destinations." Clearly this demolition and build project does not meet the first guideline. The second guideline seems to fail in pedestrian friendly design, as highlighted by guidelines in Community�Activity "Centers; "Buildings should beplaced in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale.. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back" from street." The'six -story, 80' front does not feel pedestrian scale. The 10' upper story step back is a minor aid, not a remedy to the imposing scale for pedestrians. A 'step down' is present at the western boundary but remains at an imposing 35' -46' (with 80' very near the southwest corner). Moreover, the Plan guides "More stringent design standards for buildings >5 stories ", which do not seem - have been imposed. The traffic situation in this area on France Avenue is already congested. The addition of these housing units and .retail — with seemingly insufficient entry and exit points based on the current plans — will exacerbate the problem. In particular, vehicles desiring to head northward from the site could (1) initially head southbound on France and determine a safe and efficient-approach to reverse course or, alternatively, could head west on 72nd to (2) Lynmar Lane then Hazelton Drive followed by a left onto France; or (3) Cornelia Drive to 70th Street to, for example Hwy. 100. Option 1 suggests a dangerous amount of U -turn or turnaround traffic. The latter two greatly increase traffic in the residential neighborhoods west of the development; in particular, the increased vehicular traffic on Cornelia Drive past the elementary school would be a dangerous change in traffic patterns especially during the coincident morning commute and arrival of schoolchildren. I appreciate that such a development also has benefits for the city in regards to tax revenue and addition of affordable housing. ,There are numerous ways to successfully achieve such goals while adhering to an evolving Comprehensive Plan that the city, rightfully, prides itself on and has benefitted greatly from. The proposed project-does not represent a successful merger of the collective objectives. Sincerely, Benjamin Hackel Heather Braniain From � Eva Lockhart <Eva.Lockhart@mpKAl2.mn.us> Sent: Monday, July14, 2014 5:20 PM, To: Cary Teague Cc: Cary Teague Subject ..mixed use development proposal on France Ave. Importance: High Dear Planning Commission for the City of Edina and Mr. Teague: On behalf of all four adults living on Fondell Drive In Edina, I would like -to voice our collective dismay, concerning the- mixed-use. project proposed for 72nd street and France Avenue.here in Edina. I have been a tax payer and home owner in this section of Edina for the past twenty years arnd'specifically purchased my home "because of the excellent elementary school: (Cornelia) nearby, within walking distance of My. home, as well,as the quiet stability of the neighborhood, its safety and'the many wonderful'perks and "trails within walking distance of my home. If you lived on my street you would see countless people walking with strollers, wlth.their dogs, riding bikes with their children and you could easily stroll to Fred Richards to play golf,-to Arneson Acres to see the lovely gardens, to Lake Cornelia for a picnic and to the large park and pool area nearby as ,well. Yes, retail space also surrounds us, all along France Avenue, all along 70th street between France and York Avenues, at the Galleria, the Rue de France shops, at Target, the mall across from Target'and at the large Southdale complex and at Byerlys, which is also expanding to include apartments. Additional °apartment buildings are also going up adjacent to Southdale and will be going up across the street on York Avenue as well. Yet suddenly a developer has decided that our neighborhood too- -a purely residential neighborhood with an elementary school and a care facility. for the elderly, now needs a giant retail and apartment complex as well! This is ridiculous and represents over -kill and an extreme over.- saturation of thisportion of Edina:. The traffic along France Avenue Is already incredibly busy; we know that many people will attempt to cut through our neighborhood In' order to gain faster access to 70th street and thereby to highways 62 or 100 in order to avoid the increased congestion on France Avenue. If this project Is allowed hundreds of additional vehicles will be on France every day and many of those will drive through our neighborhood, endangering children and adults in what has been a quiet, peaceful and stable neighborhood. Property values will also be affected by the noise of construction, the looming sic story buildings that are proposed and by the increased traffic, dangers and congestion that will result We, in our neighborhood, are,already concerned about the increased traffic resulting fromthe apartments already being built next to Byerys and next to-Southdale. Just where will all the traffic from people living in these buildings go? Down streets where children play, where they walk to and from school and along, "cut- through" streets in an all - residential neighborhood that DOES NOT need further retail nor giant, light- blocking apartment buildingsl There is absolutely no need for such a giant project, for amendments to our four story law, for additional amendments increasing density and the like. Our Council MUST represents the needs and beliefs and the quality of life for Its citizens and home - owners and not the desires of over - zealous developers! We expect that this email, with our and our neighbors',objections, will be given to the planning commission and to the Council at Tuesday's meeting on July 15th. Please feel free to contact us as well at 952 - 212 -4169. Thank you! Eva Lockhart, Sarah Lockhart and Jennifer Lockhart and Nancy Jacobson Residents of Fondell Drive, Edina Heather Branigin From: Sue Nelson <suenelson9 @aol.com> Sent Monday; July 14, 2014 5:01 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France avenue retail project Dear Mr. Teague: My husband and I have owned a home at 7200 Cornelia Dr for over 28 years. It has recently been brought to out attention that City of Edina is considering allowing a 6 story rental retail project be built on 72nd and France. We are absolutely OPPOSED to the project. In the past few years several projects have been allowed to be built that have done nothing for the neighborhood streets to be clogged with traffic!! With 70th street being so congested that you have to wait several lights to proceed,',through the intersection at 70th and Cornelia.... then you have the ridiculous roundabouts 111 Let me list a few things that have added to traffic congestion in he area Whole foods addition Shopping area that houses five guys, potbelly, the container store. Never enough parking, people parking in the macys parking lot and walking across, adding to safety concerns, and long lines trying to exit.the area. This has been made worse because of the median built so that you can not exit byerlys to the south except through this intersection. With the addition of the housing complex and the new building to the east of byerlys you have already in traffic br- beyond an acceptable level The funeral home at the intersection of hazelton and France blocks access Wall roads every time there is a large funeral This is just a short list of projects. To pile another large scale project on top of those already under construction, would conjest our streets, and devalue our homes. Please do NOT allow this project to go any further!! I would ask that you present this email to the city council, and forward citizens concerns.on this development to the city Planning Commission. Sincerely Sue and Mike Nelson 7200 Cornelia Dr. From: Pat Shideman fmailtopshidemarift nail.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:41 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Six story France Avenue rental /retail Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Pat Shideman <pshideman gmail.com> Date: July 14, 2014 at 2:41:23 PM CDT To: "ctea ue@edinamm.gov" <cteaQue edinamm. ov> Subject: Six story France Avenue rental/retail This massive project is too big for the space and is inappropriate for a residential neighborhood. France Avenue is overburdened now and the increase in traffic will adversely impact our neighborhood and elementary school. We feel our City Council should look out for the best interests of its residents and neighborhoods, not the developer. Pat and Jeff Shideman Glouchester Drive Sent from my iPhone Heather Braniain From: Cary Teague Sent Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:29 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW:'72nd and France Development x Cary Teague, Community Development Director ga 952- 826 -0460 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 1 Cell 952- 826 0236 4 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 cteaaueCdzEdinaMN.aov l www. Edina MN.gov1Plannina ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: blair christie fmailto :tilairsc(cigoocilemail.coml Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:34 PM To: Cary Teague ,. Subject: 72nd and France Development I am a resident of 7316 Cornelia drive in Edina. A flyer was dropped off at our doorstep detailing the development of 72nd and France area. I found this concerning. Mostly I'm concerned with the added burden to the infrastructure. I understand the elementary school nearby is beyond overflowing, and traffic on France and the area is concerning on a good day. I would like to voice my opinion that if facts are as stated in this flyer, I am opposed to this new development being 6 stories, the occupancy and number of units and various other details. Thanks, Blair Christie 7316 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 i From: Robert fmailto:robertstout @ centurylink.net] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 2:42 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed NHH Properties development Dear Director Teague, This message is to inform you that I am strongly opposed to the current proposed'development of 7200 France Avenue. I do not oppose redevelopment within. the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal far exceeds the plan on many levels. I am very disappointed that the planning commission failed to reference. the Comprehensive Plan in allowing the "sketch plan" to.move''oh'to the City Council. The planning commission has thereby failed to protect the residents. ..The current configuration. is perfectly designed as an anchor for a large undeveloped location hot a fully'bu.ilt suburban residential area. I frequently use 72nd to exit my neighborhood so I'm well aware of the intersection. I cannot stress strongly enough the traffic congestion this proposal would create for the residents south of 70th street between France Ave. and Hwy 100 (especially adjacent and nearby home owners). I won't list off the "what ifs" at this time, but simple logic says they are many and they are major. The developer should be told to reconfigure the proposal to be in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. We spent quite a large amount of tax dollars putting together this plan and as a taxpayer, I expect everyone involved to abide by it! Thank you, Robert Stoutenburgh 7449 W Shore Dr Edina, MN 55435 THE WESTIN EDINA GALLERIA 3201 Galleria, Edina, MN 55435 United States T 952.567.5000 F 952.567.5010 westin.com/edinagalleria July, 8, 2014 Dear Officials and Members: Recently I was invited to listen to Lauren Morse - Wendt, Diaconal Minister, speak to our condominium owners here in Edina regarding youth homelessness and Edina jobs. The homeless youth issue was sad to hear. Their plight and need for a place to call home is important. The 66 West Project sounds like the answer. I was inspired for what the future might hold for some of these youths. The project being considered is worthy and fulfilling on many levels. The 66 West project should not be passed over. It is vital because our youths are our future. 66 West could be a great place to live and an asset to the community. The location is perfect because it would fit into the surroundings very well. WESTIN' HOTELS & RESORTS Edina would be a great location for housing for homeless youth to happen and the specific location at 3330 W. 66th near Southdale Mall and the Westin hotel nearby is ideal. There are many job opportunities and great transportation access. Speaking personally I would like to see 66 West become a reality for homeless youth and for the benefit of local businesses. Totally a win win combination. Sincerely, Sharon Sullivan Director of Human Resources The Westin Edina Gallena Is independently owned by Gnllcria Hotel, LLG and operated by Wischermann Partners under license Issued by Nest in Hotel Management. L.P. From: john thomas [mailto:"ex(ftmail coml On Behalf Of John C. Thomas Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:31 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Bolsclair corp /proposed building I have just received information regarding the proposed new building for 72nd and France Ave. The proposed rendering that appeared in the Mpls/St Paul Business journal shows a development that is out of sync with other buildings on France Avenue. It is much too large for the property. I assume the Developers proposed a plan knowing that the development is much larger than is needed or the surrounding area can absorb with the idea that the Commission would approve something a bit smaller but still larger than what makes the most architectural sense. Edina is a seperate and distinct community but the proposal looks like it is more appropriate for St Louis Park or the northern suburbs. I am aware that the Commission will approve something but would request that the Commission not approve the current proposal and request a scaled down version, if at all needed. Something smaller with more green space and less traffic would be better than the current proposal. Perhaps the Developers could relocate this project to,a Los Angeles suburb where it would fit in better. Please forward this to the Commission as my opposition to the proposal. Thanks John C. Thomas 7206 Bristol Circle Edina, 55435 612/812/2366 From: jacklyn eastman [mailto :jacklynseastman @gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:10 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Building Dear Cary, I was just alerted by my. son who lives on Cornelia Drive about the proposed apartment building for 7200 France Ave So. I hope you will pass my thoughts along to the City Council for me. I was raised in Edina, I raised my kids' iii Edina, and my oldest son currently lives in Edina. WE LOVE EDINA. We love.Edina because it is not like any other-community. It has been a well - planned community like no other and it is just that - a community. People tend to stay in Edina and THERE IS REASON FOR THAT. I cannot believe the traffic nightmare on France Ave created for bikers WHO DO NOT LIVE IN EDINA. To add another apartment building with 195 rental units is ridiculous. There are already huge complexes going up right by Southdale. I LOVE EDINA - and I actually avoid that area altogether now:because of the traffic. This project is going to spoil our community. The city council is taking away what makes Edina GREAT - away from us. Why do you think Edina has consistently maintained our home values when other communities have NOT? Because we do, things different. I wonder which people who are part of this decision making process have something to gain by this ?? Do these people have kids in Edina? Affordable housing will bring more students into the schools that are already packed full. For the first time in Edina history open enrollment is closed to other communities. Why is it that the people in the Linden Hills area of Minneapolis can stop building projects from being over 3 stories? I guess their city council members listen to them. This is OUR COMMUNITY. It is not a city. Please do not let this happen. What has worked in the past - works. Jackie Eastman 6216 Parkwood Rd. Edina, MN Heather Branigin From: Lisa Taylor <1123065 @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 201410:34 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Housing for Homeless Youth To Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members: My name is Lisa Taylor. I am a member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church and formerly a 33 year resident of Edina. I am writing to urge you to support the proposed 66 West housing project. St. Stephen's has always had a strong commitment to youth and when I became aware of the scope of youth in the community who are aging out of foster care or who are couch - hopping to avoid issues at home over which they have no control, I realized that this is an issue that we, as a community, need to address. Simultaneously, my 15 year old grandson told me "this is the most critical hidden issue that we have in our community" The Southdale area is an ideal location with the employment opportunities and the availability of public transportation. I think that it is important to understand that these are youth who WANT to complete their educations and be employed as contributing citizens. We owe it to them to help them realize these very attainable goals. Thank you for your attention to this issue. Please support the zoning changes necessary to make 66 West a reality. Sincerely, Lisa Taylor r From: Jon Hall fmailto:jhall.fceCai)gmaii.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:43 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Six story France Ave Project Dear Mr. Teague, The proposed project on France Ave and 72 street certainly does not in the interest of Edina residents in that area not to mention the increased traffic to a nearby neighbor hood school. Jon Hall 7200 Bristo Circle 952- 200 -9545 From: Vladimir Sverak fmailto•sveraKbmath.umn.edul Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:34 AM To: Cary.Teague Subject: France @ 72nd project Dear ,Mr. Teague, 2- and._my wife recently leaned about the proposed development at France & 72nd Street. In our opinion, a six -story building with so many apartments would be too much. The area cannot accommodate so much density without significant . adverse effects .(traffic congestion etc). The development in the area should be,kept at a reasonable level, such,as, for example, at 50th a France, where a six -story building would surely be out of the question. The area .at 72nd and France should be' treated similarly. Sincerely, V. Sverak 4416 Fondell Drive - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Cathleen Campbell [mailto:cathvlc @ mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11 :58 AM To: Cary Teague; jhovland@krausehovland.com Subject: Re: France at 72nd St Deelopement On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Cathleen Campbell wrote: > On Jul 15, 2014, at 11 :33 AM, Cathleen Campbell wrote: >> Hello Cary Teague Scott Neal,and members of the planing commission, >> I am a Cornelia resident of 38 years. Cornelia is a neighborhood of >> many, many longtime residents -as well a neighborhood and school >> district representing many ethnicities. We are not "just" a >> neighborhood of starter homes where people get their foot in the door to EDINA Schools and then soon move up and out. We stay and love the proximity of everything this part of Edina has to offer including the close proximity to major highways. We also love being close to Byerly's our grocer of 40 years which so many of us now feel will be difficult to navigate in and around because of the planned density and will also add so many traffic juxtapositions for France Avenue, which is everyones thoroughfare. >> Likewise'on the matter of redevelopment of the corner of.France at >> 72nd Street please plan wisely; this is a gateway Into and out of our >> neighborhood, it is a very fragile traffic site as we now have many cars cutting through the area from 70th St.' at higher speeds along Cornelia Drive where the school bus driveways, pedestrian, and drop off traffic must navigate this excess. We therefore fear the fate of the intersection at 72nd and France with any increased development.ofthat corner. Even if the ingress and egress is shifted to France it will endanger moving traffic that will necessarily slow to enter` or seek to exit. >> To my surprise I have focused only on traffic and navigating a >> difficult situation when I object to so many other factors: Let's not alter our COMPREHENSIVE PLAN because the builder feels,the numbers >> can be made to work for them. This should be maintained as low level transitional to residential commercial. Keep greater density on the other side of France, or better yet where there is already a development with the correct zoning and let's not be dense about first level retail- the area is already retail heaven, all of this new square footage threatens to become on going "for rent or lease" parcels, adding to the statistic for failed businesses . Please give neighbor like scrutiny to this project, 7201 Bristol Circle Cathleen Campbell, From: Imishaw(acomcast.net [mailto•Imishaw6comcast.net"I Sent:. Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:41 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Opposition to 72 and France proposal Ms. Teague, We are definitely opposed to this massive mixed housing /retail development. We need to concentrate on keeping the neighborhoods. true neighborhoods and preserve the Edina family and neighborhood environment that we have. Don ' t we have enough complexes nou h of these already with the Southdale,`Byerlyss and p Wicks furniture developments? Are all area apartment complexs at full occupancy? Please represent our community in opposing this newest development. Leroy and Mary Shaw From: jmpet:ersen4(&aol:com fmailto:jmpetersen4@)aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France and 72nd project Cary, I am not in favor of the size and density of this project and opposed to the traffic pattern this would propose. I plan on attending the meeting tonight. Please forward to the Planning Commission. Can't Wait.to see the amends needed for the Fred / Office border project. Thank you, Jim Petersen 7401 Kellogg Avenue 612 - 597 -0039 Lake Edina Park Path - No Fred closing - No / _ • � q / s•- ... - Z- .GLi- ri�. "Y - r �.-''z i ,y .may Vii, $ �y 0,.3 t & J� _ ... .,: 'S 49 #SLiC7„99_"�^e :T:,SL..ir,.y'`I. :. - v� e Name: 2— 7 0 14 x: L -1 .,PH 2.1. Address: Congregation: Dear Edina. City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable - housing.and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults.. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Please help suburban youth experiencing Edina, MN 55424 homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, 11lll' ill' i' llsq,;: i Ill ' i'i- Jill 1iii l 11111i11J. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS &RELATIONS COMMISSION. May 27, 2014 7:00pm Community Room - City Hall CALL TO ORDER Chair,Seidman called meeting to orderat 7:00pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Arsenault,, Bigbee, Haeg, Kennedy, Sanders, Seidman, and Winnick. 'Staff present: MJ'Lamon, Staff Liaison, and Annie Coyle, City Management Fellow. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to approve the meeting agenda of May 27, 2014; motion seconded by Commissioner Kennedy. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES Chair Seidman was added to roll call. Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee and seconded by Commissioner Winnick to approve the minutes. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Bias Offense Response Plan Commissioner Winnick provided a background summary of the Bias Offense Response Plan. It was originally adopted in 1997 and has been updated 3 times since. There is no record of the plan ever being utiliied. Commissioners reviewed the Southview Middle School incident. from August 11th, 2013. At that time, Mayor Hovland issued a press release and requested .HRRC to take a census of response to bias offenses from every City Department; Commissioners also reviewed a'memo from City Manager Neal to department heads instigating HRRC's interviews with different departments. Members Bigbee, Winnick and /or Siedman met with representatives of each City Department. Reports are attached to these minutes. Commissioner Carter arrived at 7:08pm. Changes to the plan were discussed: 1. Amendment to department survey page 19 change "FROM STEVE" to Note: Commissioner Winnick provided detailed review of Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan DRAFT which included Appendix A'(2013. Minnesota. State Statute 611A.79), Appendix B (Community Resources Network), and Edina Police Department Informed Consent. 2. The following amendments were recommended: 1. Page 1, under.partnership: Add local in front of community partners. "Local community pactnersare identified on....." 2. Page 2, 1. Mn. Changed to Minn. 3. Page 2, 1. The police department slall.riotify the City manager and the HRRC chair upon receipt of a substantiated`report.of an event or, incident which may constitute of a bias offense under Minn. state statute. 4. Page 1, under partnership: add Community Resources Network after Appendix B. 5. Page 2, 11. Sponsor trainings, education, and public informationAo promote the understanding... Motion was made by Commissioner Winnick to approve. Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan with recommended amendments. Commissioner Arseneault made a motion to table current motion, make recommended amendments and ask all Commissioners to send changes or edits to the Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan to Commissioner Winnick. Commissioner Winnick will compile changes to The Plan and bring back to June meeting to approve prior to going to City Council. Commissioner Winnick made an amendment to his original motion that in addition to the plan, commissioners will review resolutions drafted by Winnick and provide feedback so the package can be presented at June 2014 meeting. Motion second by Commissioner Sanders. Motion carried. City Staff will inform Manager Neal about delay in Bias Offense Plan. Bias Offense Response and Prevention subcommittee has a meeting schedule on June 2nd with the Police Chief and Manager Neal. City Staff will send out current DRAFT of The Plan and requested edits be sent to liaison for Commissioner Winnick to. compile. B. Days of Remembrance Chair Seidman provided brief summary of Days of Remembrance and Genocide Awareness events held in April 2014. HRRC held 3 events. The City Council approved Holocaust recognition as an annual observance. Genocide Awareness was not approved by City Council, but in April of 2014, Gov. Dayton dedicated every April in Minnesota to be known as Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month. April was chosen because there are 6 different genocides that have their official dates of memorialization in April. Motion made by Commissioner Kennedy to write Genocide Awareness proclamation in perpetuity. Commissioners brought forward the idea of creating a proclamation that was more inclusive. Chair Seidman suggested to move this topic for discussion to June 2014 meeting. Days of Remembrance proclamation signed by Mayor Hovland will be provided in June meeting packet for commission review. Commissioner Arseneault made motion to table the Genocide Awareness proclamation. Commissioner Bigbee second. Motion passed. Chair Seidman reminded commissioners to come to the meeting next month with ideas on what the HRRC may want to observe. C. Review Committee and Working Group Definitions. Chair Seidman reviewed the subcommittee working group chart. Commissioner Davis offered to join the Tom Oye sub - committee. Winnick remains the Chair of that subcommittee. Commissioner Carter asked to be added to the nominating committee. Commissioner Sanders will be added to the Special Needs Awareness Sub - Committee. There was a request to add the Special Needs Awareness to the June 2014 meeting agenda to discuss potential ideas for the initiative. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. VIII. CHAIR, COMMISSION MEMBER, AND STUDENT COMMENTS A. Chair Comments Commissioners decided there would not be time for a guest speaker in June. June 2014's agenda will include Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan, Special Needs, Genocide Awareness /DOR Proclamation, and review of the 2014 work plan. Additionally, Commissioners will make a list of items to present to City Council and discuss commission members that can champion initiatives. Commissioner Kennedy expressed interest in the Human Rights City initiative. She will follow up with Commissioner Harrington to coordinate presentation to City Council on August 4th (work session). Commissioner Winnick will draft a letter for Seidman to sign in sympathy of Fred Baron's death. Commissioner Kennedy shared that the MN State Bar Association passed a conflict free resolution which is the same resolution that the City of Edina endorses. The MN Bar Association is the first Bar Association to do so. Commissioner Bigbee is planning on attending the Islamic Perspective information session. IX. STAFF COMMENTS None. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee to adjourn the May 27th, 2014 meeting of the Human Rights and Relations Commission; motion was second by Commissioner Kennedy. Motion carried. Adjournment at 9:27 pm. Respectfully submitted, MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison Minutes approved by HRRC June 24, 2014 Jan Seidman, HRRC Chair 7 r :' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE L 1, 201.4 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER I1. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call: Scherer, Lee. Olson, Halva, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton Members absent from roll: Schroeder 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Carr moved approval of the June 11, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission May 14, 2014 Commissioner Carr moved approval of the May 14, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No community comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARING A. Variance. Stojmenovic. 5501. France Avenue, Edina, MN. Staff Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the 1.3 -foot side street, 10.3 -foot rear yard setback and a-5 -foot front yard setback variance to allow a garage and second floor addition to a home located in the southeast corner of France Ave. and West 55th Street. The owners are requesting variances to allow additions to the home at the same nonconforming front and rear yard setback as existing and add a garage west of the home that will be 13.7 feet from the lot line adjacent to France Ave. instead of the 15 foot setback as is required. The project is a major remodel and addition to an existing nonconforming single family home. All of the improvements will match the existing setbacks with the exception of setback from France Ave. to provide for a garage. Page 1 of 8 Aaker reported that the property has a number of challenges including that it is a corner lot requiring deeper setbacks to both streets; the 'existing structure is nonconforming regarding both front and rear yard setback which can be attributed to the shallow lot,depth of 84 feet, (minimum lot depth per ordinance is 120 feet),and'the lot is.quite_small at 6,720 square feet in area. Aaker explained that the required setback from West 55th Street is established by the front yard setback 'of the home to the east located at 3809 West 55th. Street which is located approximately 33 feet from the' lot line adjacent to West 55th Street. The:neighbor's home was built in 1982, (much later than the year built.of the subject home). The subject home is located 28.1 `feet from West 55th Street and pre - dates all of the surrounding homes. The structure that is now a dwelling unit was originally built as a church. No garage had been necessary at the time of construction since it was built as a church and no garage has ever been'located on -site. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum two car garage per single dwelling unit. The challenge has been finding a suitable location on the property that allows access from the street. Access cannot' be accomplished from France Ave. since it is a busy county road, so the property must gain access from West 55th Street. The Engineering Department has approved access from'West 55th Street as indicated in an attached e-mail. The subject home has had no improvements and few permits for maintenance indicated in the building file and had been rental property for many years. The proposed improvements and additions would bring the home up to current building code standards and provide needed living space and a garage for the owner's family. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a) The practical difficult is caused by the location of the existing home. b) The encroachments into the setback continue existing nonconforming setbacks that were established when the original structure was built on the property. c) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing home relative to the orientation of surrounding homes. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition: 1. The home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped, April 30, 2014. Appearing for the Applicant Aleksander and Erin Stojmenovic, property owners Discussion Commissioner Carr asked Planner Aaker if there was a sidewalk on France Avenue. Planner Aaker responded there is no sidewalk. Carr asked if a sidewalk could be build. Aaker responded in the affirmative. Carr asked where the new garage entrance would be. Aaker responded on West 55th Street. Page 2 of 8 Applicant Comments Mr. Stojmenovic told the Commission he was very happy to be in Edina, adding he loves the City and schools. Stojmenovic stated he believes the proposed addition and alteration to the existing home will bean, improvement not only for him but for the neighborhood. He, further added it was important to him to be, considerate of the neighbors. Concluding, Stojmenovic said he has neighborhood support for the project. . Discussion Chair Staunton acknowledged neighborhood support correspondence and stated in his opinion this is a good project. Commissioner Lee commented in her.opinion this is algood solution, adding it's a perfect example of taking into consideration building mass and working with the site and neighborhood. Lee said the roof treatment pulls the house back from the street, reiterating the entire project makes good use of the site. Lee complimented the property owners on their project. Public Hearing Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak to the issue, being none; Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All vote aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Scherer stated she likes the project, adding she is a huge fan of garages and this proposal brings the house into compliance with the City's2 -stall garage requirement. Concluding, Scherer said she appreciates all that was done to minimize the impact of the addition. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Variance. Whiteman. 3932/34 West.49th Street, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Aaker presented the staff report concluding that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with existing conditions. 3) The imposed lot area does not allow redevelopment of the property without the benefit of a variance or a zone change. Page 3 of 8 1 Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: 1)' Subject to staff approval, the site must be<developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions: Survey date stamped:.May 29, 2014 and building plans and elevations date stamped: May I, 2014. Auoearing for the Applicant Paul Whiteman, applicant Discussion Commissioner Carr asked for variance clarification. Planner Aaker explained that the variances requested are for lot width and lot area. ,She informed the Commission when 'platted the lot met code; however, the City amended the Ordinance to now.require a lot width of 90 -feet and a lot area of 15.000 square feet. The double proposed for the lot meets all other zoning ordinance requirements. Commissioner Lee asked Planner Aaker if this would be a complete teardown. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative. . Commissioner Platteter referred to the survey and questioned "where the rest of the survey was ".` Continuing, Platteter said if he reads the survey correctly required information wasn't provided and the survey was not signed by a licensed professional engineer; also required by Code. Planner Aaker explained the survey Platteter referred to is required at the building permit stage, adding the variance request is for lot area and lot width; not the structure; reiterating the proposed building meets code requirements. A discussion ensued with Commissioners of the opinion since a variance is required the Commission has the right to view the plans for the proposed house and to see a survey indicating house placement, and water management plan including grading, drainage, etc. Commissioners stressed that in their opinion the plans presented fall short of what's needed to make an educated decision. Chair Staunton asked Commissioners if they believe the variance request should be continued to allow the applicant time to.provide adequate building and drainage plans. Commissioners agreed that it's a good idea to continue the variance request until the; next meeting suggesting the following: • Provide a survey. (Storm water maintenance) signed by a licensed professional engineer. • Consider one driveway vs. two as proposed. • Consider using pervious materials for the driveway(s). • Consider massing; the schematic of the home appears large; suggesting that the applicant pull the house back because as presented the building feels like it is looming over the rest of the area. • Focus on drainage and provide further information on the survey to include drainage, soil removal, soil addition; etc. • Acknowledge that the building plans presented are inadequate with the suggestion that the applicant consider adding some form of architectural relief on the large building wall. Page 4 of 8 • Consider rezoning the property to R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District noting there are single dwelling unit lots in the neighborhood. • Acknowledge that low density residential has been applied throughout the City as a buffer for the R- I Single Dwelling unit district. Further discussion continued with Commissioners agreeing that although the request is for a lot width and lot area variance more detail is needed on both the survey (civil) and building plans before the Commission can act on the requested variance. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to continue the variance until the next meeting of the Planning Commission on June 25, 2014 to allow the applicant time to present a more detailed survey and consider amending the design to include sidewall articulation and one driveway (if driveways remain at two consider pavers etc.) Commissioner Scherer . seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Residential Density for Mixed Use Areas Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that as a result of the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Lennar project, the Metropolitan Council requested that the City establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each District. Teague explained that Floor Area Ratio (FAR) alone cannot be used to determine densities. Teague presented a Resolution approving Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding residential density for mixed use areas and asked the Commissioners for their comments. Concluding, Teague reported that the Metropolitan Council is aware of the inconsistencies in the density ranges in Edina's Comprehensive Plan and that the City is actively working on a solution to amend the Plan to better reflect the intent. Discussion A discussion ensued acknowledging the need to amend the density ranges; noting currently in the City's most intense districts the density guidelines are less than that of the low density residential category. It was further discussed as the density guidelines are reviewed and amended there may be impact on current projects (Byerly's) and future projects (Grandview). Commissioners raised the following issues: Page 5 of 8 • Are the proposed changes in the density guidelines for OR, MXC, RM and CAC high enough; or should they be increased • Consider not having a minimum instead of 12 -75 require 0 -75, etc.; noting that in some cities 0 is the starting point or there is no limit. Continuing it was observed in some of Edina's small commercial nodes where redevelopment could happen a proposal may work better with less residential units than the minimum would allow. It was also noted that having a minimum would encourage the development of housing. • It was suggested that a sentence be added above the Future Land Use Categories table that indicates "when residential development is proposed in a mixed use district, the residential density range shall apply, in addition to the FAR requirement. Residential development is not required in mixed use areas. Chair Staunton referred to correspondence from Scott Takenoff, Pentagon Revival and asked if anyone was present to speak to the issue, being none Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. The discussion continued with Commissioners noting that in 2015 the City will begin the Comprehensive Plan revision process and at that time more thought and time could be put into the decision making process on density guidelines. A number of Commissioners felt that amending the ranges at this time without more discussion wouldn't be prudent; acknowledging that any changes to the density ranges would have major development consequences. It was further suggested that the Commission consider acting on what was presented by staff. Chair Staunton commented after further thought he would agree that more discussion and thought is warranted in making density decisions and asked Planner Teague how he arrived at the density ranges proposed in the resolution. Planner Teague responded that he arrived at those numbers staying consistent with the City's already established high density residential range, and incorporating density ranges that are consistent with existing development within those districts. Commissioner Platteter said in his opinion that the suggested changes to increase density guidelines this evening are reasonable; however, he understands the feelings of other Commissioners that more thought and discussion on these changes needs to take place. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend approval of the proposed Resolution approving Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding residential density for mixed use areas, building height, floor area ratio and land use in its entirety as presented by staff. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest asked for an amendment to the motion to be placed before the Future Land Use Categories table to read "when residential development is proposed in a mixed use Page 6 of 8 district, the residential density range shall apply, in addition to the FAR requirement. Residential development is not required in mixed use areas. Commissioners Platteter and Scherer accepted that amendment. All voted aye; motion "carried. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Work Plan Chair Staunton noted its half way through the year and the Commission needs to "touch base" with its work plan. Staunton commented that sometime.in September the Commission will meet with the.City Council, adding it would be nice to have a rough draft of the 2,015 Work Plan. Staunton asked Commissioners for their comments. Commissioner Carr said she would like to reiterate her priority on lighting, adding light - pollution is an issue that needs to be addressed especially since the City is experiencing multiple developments and redevelopments. Carr suggested that staff contact other cities to find out "What's out there" vs. the City's current ordinance on lighting. Teague reported he has gathered background information on the issue and would place lighting on the next Planning Commission agenda for further discussion. Chair Staunton noted lighting/noise is an ordinance on the list for "review" with three other items; sign plan, parking regulations and unit size for senior housing. Staunton asked if the Commission thinks these ordinance issues should continue into 2015. Planner Teague responded that ordinance issues are large undertakings and may need to be extended into 2015. Commissioners agreed; however wondered if senior housing unit size could be addressed more quickly administratively. The Sign Plan Ordinance and parking regulations /Proof of Parking could be considered. at the end of the year or next. The Commission continued discussing policy recommendations. Chair Staunton noted that Commissioner Platteter has already been working on the mid -term comp plan, adding the tree ordinance is also in the process; however, hasn't been formally adopted ( a work session scheduled for August). A discussion ensued on the needs of the 2014 Work Plan acknowledging more work needs to be accomplished. A work session was discussed with Planner Teague "telling Commissioners he would advise them on the date(s). It was further suggested that the work session be held prior to a Planning Commission meeting (5:00 PM). Teague said he would coordinate the date with Commissioners and get back with them. Continuing, the discussion Commissioners Page 7 of 8 acknowledged the start of the Wooddale Valley View Small Area plan; noting "small area plan" was an item on the 2014 Work Plan that was earmarked to continue into 2015. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Staunton reported that Commissioner Potts resigned his seat on the Planning Commission and read for Commissioners a letter of resignation from Potts. Commissioner Carr reported on Living Streets and also informed the Commission Paul Thompson with the Energy and Environment Commission is hosting a walk on July 4`h on "Edina Deeper Shade of Green for those who want to participate. Commissioners Forrest and Lee reported that there are members of the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan team. She reported a kickoff meeting would be held at the Edina Senior Center on June 18`h 6:30 pm. Forrest said all are invited to attend this meeting. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported the next planning commission meeting will be sizeable; including the rezoning of the single dwelling unit into a double dwelling unit on West 496 Street XI. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Lee moved adjournment at 9:20 PM. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. 'V Page 8 of 8