Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-09-02_COUNCIL MEETING
f.' AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY DAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be . enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item , will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular. Meeting Of August 19, 2014, Closed Meeting of August 19, 2014 And Work Session Of August 19, 2014 B. Receive Payment.Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, /21/2014 TOTAL $1,773,266.74 And Per Pre -List Dated 8/24/204 TOTAL $1,355,786.96 And Purchasing Card Transaction Dated 6/27/14 7/26/2014 TOTAL. $38,950.08 C. Set Date For Canvass Of Municipal. _Election For November 7, 2014. at 5:00 p.m. D. Request. For Purchase — Replace Triple Wave Slide At Adventure Peak E. Request For Purchase — Renovation Of Lower Level Of Adventure Peak F. Authorization To Participate In 2015 -2016 Fuel Consortium G. Resolution No. _ 2014 -88 Approving Joint Powers Agreement With the City of Minneapolis Regarding Utility Services H. Resolution No. 2014 -89 Authorizing Use Of Facsimile Signatures ,By Public Officials I. Resolution No. 2014 -90 Authorizing Investment Agreement J. Request For Purchase — Security Cameras And Building Card Access, Pro -Tec Design, Braemar Athletic Complex K. Request For Purchase — Consulting Services, Park System Master Plan, Confluence, V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. France Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Agenda/Edina City Council September 2, 2014 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after_ City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing speakers must observe the j'ollowing guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING —Temporary Intoxicating On -Sale Liquor License, Church of St. Patrick, 6820 St. Patrick Lane, September 27, 2014 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING — Consider Vacation Of Public Right -of -Way, Portion of West 41 st Street, Resolution No. 2014 -91 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING — Conditional Use Permit, Allow First floor Elevation Of More than One Foot Above Existing Floor, 4603 Annaway Drive, Nicole & Greg Jennings, Resolution No. 2014 -92 (Conditional Use Permit, roll call of three affirmative votes to approve.) D. PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary'Rezoning From POD -I to PUD, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, 3330 West 66th Street, Resolution No. 2014 -93 and Resolution No. 2014 -94 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires roll call of four affirmative votes to approve. Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan, roll call of three affirmative firmative votes to approve.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During . "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues- ,or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't, slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three'"minutes. The Mayor may limit the ..number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of. time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor, or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead,.the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII.. REPO RTS/RECO M MENDATION.S: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) 10:30 p.m. A. Resolution No. 2014-87,Accepting Various Grants & Donations r, Agenda/Edina City Council September 2, 2014 Page 3 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Human Rights & Relations Commission Advisory Communication C. Minutes 1. Edina Transportation Commission, July 17, 2014 2. Energy & Environment Commission, July 10, 2014 3. Planning Commission, July 23, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT Agenda/Edina City Council September 2, 2014 Page 4 AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA —August 19, 2014 V. AUTHORIZE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3944 WEST 49- 1/2 STREET, RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -04 VI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sep 2 Work Session —Grandview Development Partner Interviews Tues Sep 2 Regular Meeting Tues Sep 16 Work Session — Grandview Development Partner Discussion Tues Sep 16 Joint Session With Heritage Preservation Board Tues Sep 16 Regular Meeting Tues Oct 7 Work Session — 2015 Boards /Commission Work Plans Tue Oct 7 Regular Meeting Tues Oct 21 Rep. Keith Ellison Update 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Business Meeting COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. Tree Ordinance Tue Oct 21 Regular Meeting Mon Nov 3 Work Session — TBD Mon Nov. 3 Regular Meeting Tues Nov. 4 GENERAL ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M. Fri Nov 7 Canvass of General Election Results Municipal Offices Tus Nov I I VETERANS' DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Nov 18 Work Session — Conflict of Interest Policy Tues Nov 18 Regular Meeting Thurs Nov 27 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 28 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED City Hall Closed 4:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:45 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 19, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded agenda as revised to add IV.P., Construction and France Store Remodel. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED by Member Brindle, approving the meeting Management Services for Edina Liquor - 50th Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item IV.G., Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -15 France Avenue Lighting, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of August 4, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 7, 2014, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $658,106.32; Police Special Revenue $130.92; Arts and Culture Fund $100.00; Working Capital Fund $125,548.38; Art Center Fund $4,368.95; Golf Dome Fund $1,220.49; Aquatic Center Fund $4,769.71; Golf Course Fund $22,360.57; Ice Arena Fund $48,876.55; Sports Dome Fund $5,866.25; Edinborough Park Fund $6,496.49; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,801.13; Liquor Fund $268,856.73; Utility Fund $41,382.12; Storm Sewer Fund $2,195.69; PSTF Agency Fund $8,595.13 TOTAL $1,203,675.43 and for receipt of payment of claims dated August 14, 2014, and consisting of 36 pages; General Fund $150,587.33; Police Special Revenue $4,193.81; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $443.00; Arts and Culture Fund $119.95; Working Capital Fund $131,546.66; Equipment Replacement Fund $167,560.96; Art Center Fund $3,932.27; Golf Dome Fund $1,405.75; Aquatic Center Fund $17,463.74; Golf Course Fund $25,373.55; Ice Arena Fund $2,822.53; Sports Dome Fund $802,047.95; Edinborough Park Fund $2,455.85; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,860.00; Liquor Fund $219,076.91; Utility Fund $429,104.81; Storm Sewer Fund $7,606.37; Recycling Fund $35,190.09; PSTF Agency Fund $1,786.27; Centennial TIF District $335.50; TOTAL $2.007,913.30 IV.C. Request for Purchase - Fiber to Pamela Park, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Castrejon, Inc. at $42,929.00 IV.D. Request for Purchase - East Parking Lot Van Valkenburg Park, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, Inc. at $75,470.00 IV.E. Accept Traffic Safety Committee Report, July 2, 2014 IV.F. Approve Amendment - Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan M.G. Request for Purchase Award of Bid Contract ENG 14 15 France Avenue Lightin IV.H. Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -I6 2014 Sidewalk Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Standard Sidewalk, Inc. at $369,831.94 IV.I. Approve Memorandum of Understanding with Minnehaha Watershed District IV.J. Approve Agreement with Metropolitan Airport Commission for Video Production Services Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 19, 2014 IV.K. Motion stating the City of Edina does not waive the City's monetary tort liability limits, per Minnesota State Statutes 466.04 Approve LMCIT Tort Liability W r IV.L. Approve Transfer of Administration of Edina Emerald Energy Program to St. Paul Port Authority IV.M. Waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -12 Amending Chapter 2 Concerning Boards & Commissions IV.N. Approve Transfer 2013 General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance IV.O. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Peter Musty, LLC For Consulting Services for Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road Small Area Plan IV.P. Approve Construction Management Services for Edina Liquor — 50th and France Store Remodel Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.G. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT ENG 14-IS FRANCE AVENUE LIGHTING —AWARDED The Council expressed concern that it had not received a streetscape design complete with depictions to assure the elements (i.e., lighting, landscaping, medians, architecture) fit together cohesively. Engineer Millner indicated it was not an issue to defer consideration of this item though it would delay installation for two weeks. Manager Neal indicated staff would provide depictions incorporating the lighting elements into the streetscape. He explained that while the bids were good for two weeks, a change of lighting fixtures would result in the need to rebid the project. Support was expressed for the proposed lighting fixture design subject to receipt of schematics. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving Request for Purchase — Award of Bid — Contract ENG 14 -15 France Avenue Lighting, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Egan Companies at $402,732.75, with the expectation the Council would receive complete streetscape depictions at the next meeting. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. EDINA GIRLS HOCKEY USA HOCKEY AWARD Edina Hockey Association Boardmembers and players introduced themselves. It was announced that the Minnesota District of USA Hockey had awarded the Edina Hockey Association with its Female Honors Award for its commitment to girls' hockey during the 2013 -2014 season. The Council was thanked for its support and providing an additional sheet of ice. The Council congratulated the Edina Hockey Association for receipt of this prestigious recognition. V.B. SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — TOPIC. SPENDING ON PUBLIC ART Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of July opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to spending on public art. Mr. Gilgenbach indicated next month's topic would be community gardens. Barbara La Valleur, Art and Culture Commissioner, thanked the Communications Department for bringing the topic of art to the public and invited all to vote for their favorite sculpture. V.C. 2014 PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS — PRESENTED Mr. Gilgenbach presented the photographs and announced winners of the 2014 Images of Edina Contest. Mayor Hovland presented the awards, congratulated the winners, and thanked all who participated. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT Page 2 l Minutes /Edina City Council /August 19, 2014 Frank Lorenz, 7501 York Avenue South, Unit 720, complimented the work of Edina Detectives who had set in motion action that brought down an international identity theft scheme. Christian Clapp, 5844 Oaklawn Avenue, expressed concern relating to lack of due notice about proposed changes to Pamela Park. Susan Aura, 5900 Oaklawn Avenue, expressed concern relating to the use of artificial turf at Pamela Park. Drew Beson, 5844 Oaklawn Avenue, thanked the Council for its work on behalf of the public and expressed concern relating to the use of artificial turf at Pamela Park. VII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -86 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -86 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION — RATIFIED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, appointing ratifying the appointment of Steve Hobbs to the Planning Commission for a term ending March 1, 2017. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, designating g—the appointment a Planning Commission alternates (1) James Bennett and (2) Scott Hughes. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. FINAL APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED FOR EDINA VETERANS MEMORIAL — GRANTED Manager Neal reviewed the Council's past consideration for constructing a Veteran's Memorial in Utley Park and indication that private funds must be the primary funding agent for the project and secured prior to the City commencing construction. Mr. Neal presented the funding breakdown for the memorial, noting staff had verified that sufficient funding was now available. Veterans Memorial Committee Chair Richard Olson and Lance Elliott, Project Design Engineer, presented a project overview and described design elements. Chair Olson reported on the status of fundraising, indicating that a total of $317,321 had been raised, which qualified for receipt of the State matching grant (statutory allocation) of $225,000. The Council recognized Edina's local legislators who had worked diligently to assure this grant was included in the bonding bill. It was noted the goal of the Veterans Memorial Committee was to dedicate Edina's Veterans Memorial on Memorial Day, 2015. The Council commended the Veterans Memorial Committee for its work, Chair Olson for his leadership, and Mr. Elliott for his volunteerism. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the final design of the Veterans Memorial at Utley Park and authorizing construction to proceed. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 19. 2014 VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES. 1. PARK BOARD, JUNE 10, 2014 AND JULY 8, 2014 2. PLANNING COMMISSION, JULY 9, 2014 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X.A. INDIANOLA /JUANITA SIDEWALK PROJECT — DESIGN REVISED The Council asked questions regarding the proposed sidewalks within the Indianola/Juanita road reconstruction project. Mr. Millner referenced the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Plan, described staffs contact with the Indianola/Juanita neighborhood, and stated he would not recommend sidewalks in that area based on present traffic warrants. The Council discussed the sidewalk project, noting this project was currently under design. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, directing staff to revise the project plans to remove the sidewalk loop from Indianola/Juanita and the two 51st Street stubs. Juanita from 50th Street to 500 feet south of 50th Street will remain in the project area until traffic warrants can be completed and analyzed.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XI.A. POLICY. CONFLICT OF INTEREST — REFERRED TO FUTURE WORK SESSION Mr. Neal explained that in the past, the City had relied on State Statutes for conflict of interest guidelines. Based on the Council's direction at its last meeting, staff drafted a Conflict of Interest Policy using the City of Brainerd's Conflict of Interest Policy as a template. It was noted the Planning Commission had, for some time, been considering whether to adopt a Conflict of Interest Policy. The Council indicated support for a uniform policy addressing conflict of interest. Staff was asked to provide additional information relating to how the draft policy compared to State Statute regulations, case law comparisons, enforceable consequences, preparatory language, and other relevant information. The Council asked staff to inform the Planning Commission that it was working on this policy and directed staff to place this item on a future Work Session agenda for additional discussion. X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 2, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the August 19, 2014, meeting available. Page 4 MINUTES OF THE CLOSED MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 19, 2014 5:09 P.M. Acting Mayor Swenson called the meeting of the Edina City Council to order at 5:09 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Acting Mayor Swenson. Mayor Hovland entered the meeting at 5:11 p.m. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Lindy Crawford, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; and Roger Knutson, City Attorney. SESSION CLOSED Member Bennett Sprag a made a motion, seconded by Member�Sprague i;� to move into closed session per Attorney- Client Privilege regarding the potential acquisition of the real property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson Motion carried. Council gave direction to staff in the matter of the property_ acquisition of the real property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. Member Bennett SIMPRr -an made a motion seconded by Member Swenson Sprague to exit the closed session at 5:41 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 5:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 2, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 19, 2014 5:41 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:41 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; and John Wallin, Finance Director. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the work session was to receive an update on the Blake Road Corridor Study Report and to review the work on the 2015 Budget. BLAKE ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT Tony. Heppelmann, WSB & Associates, Inc., the City of Hopkins' consultant for the Blake Road Corridor Study, presented an update of the study. He noted that the City of Hopkins in conjunction with the - Cities of Edina and St. Louis Park and Hennepin County was conducting a corridor study to identify and plan for transportation improvements needed to support construction of the Southwest Light Rail Transit (SWLRT) line. Mr. Heppelmann reported who has participated in the study and outlined its objections. He outlined the schedule and scope of the study, reported the public involvement to date, presented a summary of alternatives, and described the next steps. 2015 OPERATING BUDGET & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROCESS UPDATE Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the biennial budget process stating that in 2013 a two year General Operating Budget was developed that covers. 2014 -2015. He stated in 2014, the 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).would be developed. Mr. Roggernan outlined the timeline explaining what had taken place since April when the Council held its first session on the process until December when the final budget would be adopted along with the levy set for 2015. Mr. Roggeman reviewed the balances in the City's construction and equipment funds, shared feedback gathered from Speak Up Edina and a survey circulated at the volunteer recognition, reception, gave example of projects and purchases which have been difficult to fund, reviewed the need to find reliable sources of CIP funding, and also explained funds available for construction projects. The Council and staff discussed the General Fund unassigned fund balance and staffs recommendation for these funds. The Council also reviewed the 2014 -2015 operating budget process and levy noting the needed changes. Staff presented their recommended preliminary tax levies for 2015 then discussed with the Council the City's current tax capacity and valuation as well as tax capacity changes anticipated in 2015. Council gave their feedback to staff regarding the preparation of the 2015 -2019 CIP and 2015 tax levies. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 2, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKR2 LOGIS101 105.33 350376 44184800 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 677.15 350374 44287100 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 69.05 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 366.20 350555 44344100 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 146 8/21/2014 319.10 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 350744 44357900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 52.40 350550 1817416 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 89.20 350551 1817417 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 81.20 350552 1817418 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 150 8/21/2014 118.35 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 350739 1817979 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 154.70 CUSTOM STAMP 350740 1817980 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ELECTION 495.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 350616 WO- 951758 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 147 8/21/2014 222.88 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 161 8/21/2014 537.16 COFFEE 350341 1138272 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 537.16 RAMP CLEANING 350632 7070204743 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148 8121/2014 258.00 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 162 8/21/2014 2,530.84 STS PLANNING 350343 23270354.13 -8 04406.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,530.84 TISSUE, TOWELS 00005563 350634 2779949 1646:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 149 8/2112014 598.82 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page- 1 Business Unit 501H S1 StLLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION IMPR 105.33 350376 44184800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 677.15 350374 44287100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 69.05 350375 44287200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 366.20 350555 44344100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 45.00 350743 44344200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 319.10 350744 44357900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110.87 350745 90668000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 217.62 350556 90673500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.910.32 150 8/21/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 25.91 CUSTOM STAMP 350615 IN -30130 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 196.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 350616 WO- 951758 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 222.88 161 8/21/2014 100613 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 258.00 RAMP CLEANING 350632 7070204743 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 258.00 162 8/21/2014 104020 DALCO 598.82 TISSUE, TOWELS 00005563 350634 2779949 1646:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 598.82 163 8/21/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. ' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA - Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6121/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 153 8/2112014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Continued... 2,589.10' 350383 764758 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 98.40 350382 764759 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,538.45 350558 764760 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 190.80 350747 765349 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6,416.75 154 8/21/2014 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 114.65 BAKERY 350491 516999 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 123.49 350492 517239 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - 107.48 350493 517570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 56.07 350494 517942 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 401.69 155 8/21/2014 101483 MENARDS 80.14 BENCH VISE, METAL VANE 00001521 350519 64184 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.14 166 8/21/2014 100906 MT] DISTRIBUTING INC. 77.43 GAS CAP, GAUGE ASSEMBLY 00006221 350522 975104 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.43 157 8121/2014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 133.50 STEEL WEED BARRIERS 00001580 350523 295902 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 133.50 158 8/21/2014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 200.50 REPAIR LEAK 00001602 350369 16798 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 485.20 PLUMBING REPAIRS 00002089 350684 16799 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,236.35 REPAIR LEAK 00001601 350370 16807 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,922.05 159 8/21/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,298.98 VEHICLE REPAIRS 350305 650507 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,312.25 VEHICLE REPAIR 350530 652011 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,530.75 VEHICLE REPAIRS 350304 655531 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,074.20 VEHICLE REPAIR 350531 655620 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,216.18 160 8/2112014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 98.52 FILTER 00005410 350371 4030547 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page- 2 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL FIELD MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL METER REPAIR CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING METER REPAIR EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 160 8/21/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY Continued... 98.52 161 8/21/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 19.52 CONCESSION PRODUCT 350704 39760675 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 21.60- CREDIT 350706 39781971 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 277.63 CONCESSION PRODUCT 350705 40188341 .5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 275.55 162 8/21/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 790.85 350766 368970 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 557.20 350478 369133 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 632.50 350477 369134 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,980.55 385813 8/21/2014 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 410.81 DOOR REPAIR 350610 21408131 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 410.81 385814 8/21/2014 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 605.00 DRIVER SAFETY CLASSES 350338 080714 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 605.00 385815 8121/2014 130442 ABAS, REBECCA 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/25/14 350419 080114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 385816 8/21/2014 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL INC. 2,753.75 JANITORIAL SERVICE 350261 6960529 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,753.75 385817 8/21/2014 129468 ACME TOOLS 868.77 ROTARY HAMMER DRILL 00001600 350487 2787213 5932.6556 TOOLS 868.77 385818 8/21/2014 132508 ADAMS, AMY 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/27/14 350422 080114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 385819 8/2112014 123708 ADVANCED IRRIGATION INC. 1,595.00 IRRIGATION SYSTEM WORK 350611 3268073014 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 3 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL STORM SEWER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No' Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385819 8/21/2014 123708 ,ADVANCED IRRIGATION INC. Continued... ' 1,046.00 IRRIGATION SERVICES 350262 3424072514 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 2,641.00 385820 8/21/2014 133504 AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 2,803.66 ELECTRICAL WORK 00001519 350263 44757 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,803.66 385821 8/21/2014 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 223.69 CO2 350714 31588016 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 223.69 385822 8/2112014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 155.91 COFFEE 350715 35580 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 155.91 385823 8/21/2014 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 207.28 350339 073114, 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 436.64 350339 073114 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 635.74 350339 073114 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 360.80 350339 073114 5421.6201 LAUNDRY. GRILL 73.63 350339 073114 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 115.59 350339 073114 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 180.32 350339 073114 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 2,010.00 385824 8/21/2014 133030 ANCHOR BLOCK COMPANY 2,095.75 GARDEN PARK DUGOUTS 00001448 350264 1- 399950 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 2,095.75 385826 8/21/2014 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 915.75 PAPER 350340 10406445 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 915.75 385826 8/21/2014 119976 AP LAWN - 108.00 WEED SPRAYING 00002091 350612 CTLKPK -0714 5765.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROMENADE EXPENSES 108.00 385827 '8/21/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 55.59- CREDIT 350486 0010918PU 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 491.29 CONCESSION PRODUCT 350716 408080434 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 8/21/2014 102817 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 483.90 BAGS FOR PERMIT CARDS 350265 N344976 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary INSPECTIONS 483.90 8/2112014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385827 8/21/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE Continued... 1,573.64 FOOD 350485 408080468. 5421.5510, COST OF GOODS SOLD 1600.4390.52 660.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 350717 408120100 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 431.82 CONCESSION PRODUCT 350718 408150457 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 385832 505.71 CONCESSION PRODUCT 350719 408150458 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,607.29 7,397.50 385828 8121/2014 350488 131832 ARROW GLOBAL ASSET DISPOSITION INC. 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 435.80 RECYCLE ELECTRONICS 350425 00088539 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 073114 435.80 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 386829 8/2112014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 977.95 8/21/2014 350741 62019 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,237.00 350553 62020 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 75.00 378.50 350342 350554 62021 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER PSTF ADMINISTRATION 871.75 350742 62247 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8/19/2014'10:27:30 Page- 5 Business Unit URILL POOL CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING_ VERNON SELLING 385830 8/21/2014 102817 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY 483.90 BAGS FOR PERMIT CARDS 350265 N344976 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 483.90 385831 812112014 134705 AUNAN, AMY 54.00 KID N' PLAY PROGRAM REFUND 350426 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 54.00 385832 8121/2014 120995 AVR INC. 7,397.50 READY MIX CONCRETE 00001254 350488 073114 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 7,622.25 READY MIX CONCRETE 00001254 350488 073114 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 15,019.75 385833 8/21/2014 100638 BACHMAN'S 75.00 LANDSCAPING CONSULTATION FEE 350342 QUOTE290182 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 75.00 385834 8/21/2014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 19.99 BATTERY 00001605 350613 018 - 346332 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 19.99 385835 8/2112014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 432.00 PIZZA 350720 D281N2468 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/2112014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business.Unit 385835 8/21/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. Continued... 216.00 PIZZA 350721 D28IN2499 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 648.00 385836 8/21/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 954.50 350449 155300 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 954.50 385837 8/21/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 241.00 COFFEE 350614 1189605 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 241.00 385838 8121/2014 134713 BIO TREE 299.00.- FERTILIZATION 350620 77328 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 299.00 385839 8/21/2014 125209 BISEK, KATIE 235.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 350427 081214 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 235.76 385840 8/21/2014 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 11,270.54 BID #1 50TH & FRANCE 350410 #1 6/30/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 67,276.21 BID #1 50TH & FRANCE 350412 #1 7/31/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 53,722.50 BID #4 50TH & FRANCE 350411 #4 6/30/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 178,196.35 13I0#4 50 & FRANCE 350413 #4 7/31/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PAR KING &WAYFINDING 4,028.00 LANNON STONE WALL REPAIR 350266 489 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 314,495.60 385841 8/21/2014 134697 BLOOMINGTON ELECTRIC COMPANY 14,250.00 BID #3 50TH &FRANCE 350418 #3 7/31/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING&WAYFIN DING. 14,250.00 385842 8/21/2014 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL 350617 080114 -2 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 385843 8/21/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 85.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES .00001427 350618 99731 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 66.15 LABELTAPE 350619 99881 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 151.82 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 144.00- CREDIT CITY OF EDINA 925396161 8/1912014 10:27:30 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 852.00 Council Check Register by GL 350623 Page- 7 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary GOLF BALLS 350624 925409217 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 8121/2014 - 8/21/2014 754.50 Check tt Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386844 8121/2014. 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS Continued... 10,000.16 LEGAL COUNSEL 286.00 073114 350746 - 121441 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10,000.16 410.00 350450 121458 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 385850 8/2112014 696.00 105248 CANADA GOOSE PROGRAM, THE 385845. 8/2112014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS GEESE REMOVAL 350429 201415 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 352.07 BRAKE CHAMBER, DIPSTICK 00005527 350344 880248 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 352.07 386861 8/21/2014 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 386846 8/21/2014 104470 - BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 503.45 350379 193.20 GOLF BALLS 350621 1002269673 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,169.85 448.88 GOLF BALLS 350622 1002270205 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 642.08 386847 8/21/2014 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/26/14 350421 080114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 200.00 386848 8/2112014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 144.00- CREDIT 350625 925396161 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 852.00 GOLF BALLS 350623 925397019 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 46.50 GOLF BALLS 350624 925409217 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 754.50 386849 8121/2014 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10,000.16 LEGAL COUNSEL 350428 073114 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 10,000.16 385850 8/2112014 105248 CANADA GOOSE PROGRAM, THE 11,946.00 GEESE REMOVAL 350429 201415 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 11,946.00 386861 8/21/2014 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 503.45 350379 385902 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,169.85 350377 385903 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 35.70 350380 390152 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 51.05 350378 390153 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 220.50 350381 391031 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,980.55 385852 8121/2014 134701 CARLSON, CHRISTOPHER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/.19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8121/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386852 812112014 134701 CARLSON, CHRISTOPHER Continued... 1,425.24 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350430 081314 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,425.24 ' 385853 8/21/2014 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 114.76 UNIFORM PURCHASE 350431 081314 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL' 114.76 i 385854 8/21/2014 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. - 730.69 350626 2892692 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATION_ S 11,059.30 350627 2893032 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 11,789.99 386866 8/21/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK ,98.93 612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911 350432 0056 -8114 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 590.02 612 E01 -0426 350268 0426 -8/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 104.93 612 E23 -0652 GV911 350433 0652 -8/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911- 59.71 952 835 -1161 350269 1161 -8/14 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 157.81 952 285 -2951 350628 2951 -8/14 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 209.07 952 835 -6661 350270 6661 -8/14 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 590.02 612 E12 -6797 350267 6797 -8/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,810.49 386856 812112014 117187_. CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 250.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES 350629 518083 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 'ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 250.00 385867 8/2112014 122084 CITY OF EDINA -UTILITIES 4,997.53 00103426 - 0345052006 350630 345052006 -8/14 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,997.53 385858 8121/2014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 163.84 350557 0138129641 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 163.84 385859 8/21/2014 120433 COMCAST 29.01 8772 10 614 0220686 350723 220686 -8/14 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 24.83 8772 10 614 0023973 350722 23973 -8/14 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 80.11 8772 10 614 0419858 350631 419858 -8114 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADM_ INISTRATION 133.95 - ' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385860 8/21/2014 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT Continued... 200.00- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT -GUST 10135 350272 BRAEMAR GOLF 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COURSE 866.61 CABLE TWINTERNET 350271 CUST 9630 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER LIQUOR 866.62 CABLE TWINTERNET 350271 CUST 9630 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER LIQUOR 866.62 CABLE TWINTERNET 350271 CUST 9630 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER LIQUOR 2,399.85 386861 8/21/2014 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 49,743.10 HOT MIX 350273 140731 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 49,743.10 385862 8/21/2014 134650 CRAWFORD, LINDY 58.11 KEYBOARD AND CASE 350434 REIMBURSE 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.11 386863 8/21/2014 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 69.08 114 - 09855685 -4 350633 7/31/14 7411.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 69.08 386864 8/21/2014 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 892.00 AUG 2014 NEWSLETTER 350345 298859 1628.6575 PRINTING 892.00 385865 8/21/2014 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE 274.00 SOIL 00006267 350489 3880 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 274.00 385866 8/21/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 150.00 PUMP REBUILD 00005560 350346 '926056 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 150.00 385867 8/21/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 556.75 110311893 350490 110311893 -7/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 556.75 385868 8121/2014 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 9 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING STREET RENOVATION ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION 7,995.00 DIAMOND DRUM ASSEMBLY 00002625 350348 802153613 2501.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PACS IS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA r 385872 8121/2014 100049 EHLERS Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1,845.00 TIF REPORTS 350635 65417 9232.6103 8/21/2014 — 8/2112014 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385868 8/21/2014 385873 8/21/2014 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. Continued... 13,525.00 GRIND LAZER 00002624 350347 802153615 2501.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5921.6180 21,520.00 SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,894.53 386869 8/21/2014 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS 386874 8121/2014 100747 ELSMORE SWIM SHOP 36.95'.1 CART PARTS 00006216 350495 910580 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS LIFEGUARD SUITS 36.95 96959 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 385870 8/2112014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. ` 79.80 AD FOR BID 350274 125241 1185.6120 _ ADVERTISING LEGAL 90.44 AD FOR BID 350275 125242 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.24 PUBLISH NOTICE 350276 125243 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 170.24 TIF DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 350277 125244, 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 106.40 NOTICE OF PRIMARY ELECTION 350278 125245 1180.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 320.00 FRANCE AVE AD 350349 126257 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 85.12 PUBLISH NOTICE 350279 127223 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 968.86 NEWSPAPER INSERT 350496 131605 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER _ 968.86 NEWSPAPER INSERT 350496 131605 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 968.87 NEWSPAPER INSERT 350496 131605 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 3,795.83 386871 8/2112014 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 8/1912014 10:27:30 Page - 10 Business Unit PACS IS GOLF CARS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS ELECTION FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING r 385872 8121/2014 100049 EHLERS 1,845.00 TIF REPORTS 350635 65417 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,845.00 385873 8/21/2014 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 2,894.53 PUMP REPAIR 00001497 350497 0053356 -IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,894.53 386874 8121/2014 100747 ELSMORE SWIM SHOP 299.70 LIFEGUARD SUITS 350724 96959 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 299.70 386875 8/21/2014 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 1,838.60 E -82 REPAIRS 350636 75418 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,838.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385876 8/21/2014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 267.05 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003705 350637 1667073 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 217.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003705 350638 1667245 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 484.55 385877 8/21/2014 117483 ENGELE, LEE 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 9/4/14 350725 081514 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150:00 385878 8/21/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 502.05 BRAKE DRUM, BRAKE SHOE KIT 350280 1- 4497460 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 360.15 MOTOR, FAN CONTROLLER 350354 1- 4503735 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ,26.88- CREDIT 350727 1- 4505033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.71- CREDIT 350726 1- 4505034 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.44 CONNECTOR 350351 1- 4505747 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.90 SEALS 350350 1- 4506732 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 230.06 BATTERIES 00005558 350355 1- 201896 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.62 ROTORS, MODULE 350352 69- 147989 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.44 RESISTOR 350353 69- 148120 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 198.77 SENSORS, GASKET KIT 350498 69- 148215 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 172.44 PARTS 350499 69- 148491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,667.28 386879 812112014 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 202.02 AD FOR BID 350281 741724192 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 202.02 385880 8/21/2014 101476 FOOTJOY 67.90 SHOES 350639 5364226 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 78.00 MERCHANDISE 350640 5578299 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 128.02 SHOES 350642 5758136 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 95.44 JACKET 350643 5758773 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.73 MERCHANDISE 350644 5761520 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 68.07 MERCHANDISE 350641 5770577 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 48.06- CREDIT 350646 6508906 - 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 81.36- CREDIT 350645 6990965 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 382.74 386881 8/21/2014 100907 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES 1,972.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 350435 POND EXPANSION 5930.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS STORM SEWER BALANCE SHEET 1,972.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8121/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386881 8/21/2014 100907 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES Continued... 386882 8/21/2014 100919 FREY, MICHAEL 140.91 PETTY CASH 350436 081214 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 223.51 PETTY CASH 350436 081214 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 364.42 386883 8/21/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 58.60 350356 073114 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 98.46 350356 073114 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 164.15 350356 073114 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 234.25 350356 073114 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 240.50 350356 073114 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 76.10 350356 073114 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 872.06 386884 8121/2014 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 624.00 50TH ANNIVERSARY SHIRTS 00006333 350500 87913 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 624.00 385885 8/21/2014 134006 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 5,800.00 GIS 350357 G20 -11198 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 5.800.00 385886 8/21/2014 134712 GOLF MAX 379.51 BALL MARKERS 350647 SI- 150930 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 379.51 386887 8121/2014 101103 GRAINGER 35.36 TOW ROPES 00006331 350502 9505503228 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 137.88 WASP /HORNET SPRAY 00001562 350282 9507543933 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 269.60 NITRILE GLOVES 00001568 350501 9508552594 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 380.34 PAPER PLATES, UTENSILS 00005561 350358 9510856256 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 823.18 386888 8/21/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 735.75 350748 170392 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 74.25 350451 170403 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 491.25 350452 170406 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 98.25 350559 170430 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,399.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385888 8/21/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued... 386889 8/2112014 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 179.40 DIMMER SWITCH 00001576 350359 974144906 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 179.40 385890 8/21/2014 134710 GREATER METRO HOUSING CORP 190.49 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350648 410 MONROE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 190.49 386891 8/21/2014 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 8,683.00 GOLF LESSONS 350503 081314 5401.4602 LESSONS 6,683.00 385892 8/2112014 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 92.40 DIRT /SOD 350283 073114 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,220.86 DIRT /SOD 350283 073114 1318.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,392.00 DIRT /SOD 350283 073114 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 513.00 DIRT /SOD 350283 073114 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 1,306.00 DIRT /SOD 350283 073114 5765.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 448.95 DIRT /SOD 350283 073114, 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 4,973.21 386893 8/21/2014 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD 15.00 SAFETY BOOTS 350284 080514 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 15.00 385894 8/21/2014 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 37.95 LATHS FOR STAKING 350360 9718 01407.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 37.95 LATHS FOR STAKING 350360 9718 01408.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 75.87 LATHS FOR STAKING 350360 9718 01406.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 75.87 LATHS FOR STAKING 350360 9718 01411.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 75.87 LATHS FOR STAKING 350360 9718 01419.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 303.51 385895 8121/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 436.73 CHLORINE 350729.3627622 5311.6545 CHEMICALS 340.79 CHLORINE 350728 3630311 5311.6545 CHEMICALS 777.52 385896 8/21/2014 - 123072 HEALTH PARTNERS 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 13 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GOLF REVENUES SENIOR CITIZENS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL TURF CARE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROMENADE EXPENSES DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN HAWKES NHOOD RECON WARDEN AVE MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 2016 RECON PARKWOOD KNOLLS B POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2,786.70 RADIO FEES CITY OF EDINA 1000048207 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,786.70 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385896 8/2112014 123072 HEALTH PARTNERS Continued... _ 478.01 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350285 ARIANNA BREKKE 1470.4329- AMBULANCE FEES 478.01 385897 8121/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 000382892 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 239.40 BEEF PATTIES 350504 025293 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 239.40 350505 025294 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 350652 54610804 478.80 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 394.58 385898 8/21/2014 350651 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 71.42 9,242.95 EXCESS INCREMENT COLLECTED 350549 081314 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 9,242.95 300.00 LAPTOPS 00004338 350653 385899 8/2112014 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,603.34 LAPTOPS 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 14 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 2,786.70 RADIO FEES 350654 1000048207 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,786.70 385900 8121/2014 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 2,152.40 REUPHOLSTER BENCHES 350286 546280 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,152.40 385901 8121/2014 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 16.00- CREDIT 350650 000382892 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 16.00 SPEAKER BAR 00004339 350649 54595201 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 34.00 LAPTOP ACCESSORIES 00004338 350652 54610804 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 394.58 LAPTOP ACCESSORIES 00004338 350651 54626148 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 71.42 LAPTOPS 00004338 350653 5466625 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 300.00 LAPTOPS 00004338 350653 5466625 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 1,603.34 LAPTOPS 00004338 350653 5466625 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 800.00 LAPTOPS 00004338 350653 5466625 5952.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES RECYCLING 3,203.34 385902 8/21/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 552.50 350385 716053 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 910.50 350749 717200 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 84.00 350560 717201 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 918.00 350386 717524 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,465.00 385903 8121/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 376.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 350655 081114 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE . R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385903 8/21/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS Continued... 376.88 385904 812112014 120683 HUBBARD, BRIAN 154.77 FOOD / PATRICK FUNERAL 350437 081414 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 154.77 385905 812112014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 315.00 350750 21878 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 450.00 350453 21980 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 765.00 385906 8/21/2014. 125031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 39.80 GOLF COURSE AD 350506 1225394 -7/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 39.80 385907 8/21/2014 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 4.79 350656 072514 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 6.37 350656 072514 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 6.46 350656 072514 1322.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 101.12 350656 072514 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 118.29 350656 072514 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 126.43 350656 072514 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 438.10 350656 072514 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 631.54 350656 072514 1644.6556 TOOLS 44.83 350656 072514 4090.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 6.39 350656 072514 5320.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 118.24 350656 072514 5311.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 68.70 350656 072514 5424.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 19.17 350656 072514 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 58.40 .350656 072514 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 16.78 350656 072514 5861.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50.19 350656 072514 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 51.95 350656 072514 5939.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 6.63 350661 ELEC -7/14 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 161.50 350659 EQUIP -7/14 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 9.82 350659 EQUIP. -7/14 4090.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 9.58 350660 FACILIT -7/14 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.65 350660 FACILIT -7114 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 107.46 350660 FACILIT -7/14 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 27.97 350663 FIRE -7114 1495.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 15 l Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL' GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION RANGE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE PARKING RAMP BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check' Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385907 8121/2014 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE Continued... 67.97 350663 FIRE -7/14 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.46 350663 FIRE -7/14 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 14.19 350658 LIQUOR -7114 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 439.99 350657 PARKS -7/14 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 494.74 350657 PARKS -7/14 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.98 350730 STREETS -7/14 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 47.81 350730 STREETS -7114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 195.40 350730 STREETS -7/14 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 398.75 350730 STREETS -7/14 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 129.87 350730 STREETS -7/14 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 20.62 350662 SWMTF -7/14 7411.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,123.14 385908 8/21/2014 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 350507 79300 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 51.50 385909 8121/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 6,662.60 350564 2241804 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,481.00 350561 2241865 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 136.35' 350562 2241866 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 35.62- 350566 2241867 , 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 240.00 350563 2241868 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 41.80 350565 2255011 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 722.80 350508 2262832 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 15,248.93 385910 8121/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 200.12 COUPLERS 00006213 350511 69111369 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 11349.05 FUNGICIDE 00006265 350512 69122596 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 318.34 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001555 350509 69147075 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PAT/ 27.58 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001559 350510 69162520 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 172.69 REPAIR PARTS 00006223 350513 69209175 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,067.78 386913 8121/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 66.20 350387 1913258 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 544.00 350388 1920238 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 160.00 350454 1920239 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,478.11 350580 1923929 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 8/21/2014 = 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385913 8/21/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,334.00 350751 1923930 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 61.91 350581 1923931 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 587.37 350573 1923932 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 586.21 350462 1923933 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,536.58 350752 1923934 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 271.93 350582 1923935 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.41 350583 1923936 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 617.88 350753 1923937 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 170.04 350584 1923938 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 589.92 350572 1923939 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,274.16 350571 1923942 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 51.16 350576 1923943 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,192.71 350574 1923944 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 904.14 350577 1923945 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,138.31 350570 1923946 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,581.33 350575 1923947 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.23 350578 1923948 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,078.71 350579 1923949 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,065.54 350461 1923950 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,391.08 350459 1923951 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,936.62 350460 1923952 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 738.45 350458 1923953! 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,862.87 350569 1923954 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 992.58 350457 1923955 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 94.23 350456 .1923956 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,991.29 350455 1923957 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 150.00 "' 350754 .1924479 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.68- 350567 622995 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.12- 350568 622997 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 100.00- 350758 629212 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.00- 350389 629284 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14.44- 350757 629286 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15.19- 350755 629431 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8.67- 350756 629498, 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.45- 350759 629690, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.67- 350586 629691 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR" VERNON SELLING 10.00- 350588 629693 .5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - VERNON SELLING 20.20- 350585 629858 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10.00- 350587 629859 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING _ R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice.&_Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385913 8/21/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 43,339.55 385914 8/21/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 491.12 UNIFORMS 00003823 ; 350664 251862 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 491.12 _ 385915 8/21/2014 134702 KIPPS HOME IMPROVEMENT, INC - 73.36 PERMIT REFUND 350438 ED132305 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 73.36 - 386916 8/2112014 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC. 282.15 ALLEY COVER 350287 238559 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 282.15 386917 8/21/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 180.56 DWI TOWS 350288 081214 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 180.56 386918 8121/2014 102403 LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE LLC _ - 27.00 SOD 00001530 350289 7166 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF -CARE ' 27.00 386919 8/21/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. - 178.00 PUMICE HAND CLEANER 00001553 350665 9302633744 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 37.19 DRILL BITS 00001561 350291 9302636567 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 12.45 WASHERS 00005553 350514 9302640196 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 227.64 385920 8/21/2014 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 535.38 SAND 350515 RICHAR7 /14 5431.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 535.38 385921 8/21/2014 116675 LIFE LINE INC. 100.00 ANNUAL PROGRAM FEE 350731 LL -5721 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 100.00 386922 8/21/2014 130079 LINK, JOSHUA .184.99 UNIFORM BOOTS 350666 081314 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - - 184.99 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014.,-, 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385923 8121/2014 101466 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER Continued... 1,350.00 PHASE 1 OPERATOR TRAINING 350290 SEAN KLAPPERICK 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,350.00 385924 8/21/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 10.78- CREDIT 350293 - 2145097 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.63- CREDIT 350667 9557 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 182.10 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 350292 5 -14376 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.69 385926 8/21/2014 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 1,000.00 AUDIT 350363 36055 4502.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FAIRVIEW FEE 500.00 AUDIT 350363 36055 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,600.00 AUDIT 350363 36055 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,000.00 AUDIT .350363 36055 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER 5,100.00 385926 8/2112014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 19,563.40 UNLEADED FUEL 350516 799547 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 975.89 GAS 00006266 350517 817326 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,031.21 GAS 00006266 350518 817331 5423.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF CARS 21, 570.50 386927 8/21/2014 118096 M -B COMPANIES INC 27.08 AIR VENT 350362 188007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.08 385928 8/21/2014 134698 MCKNIGHT, DEBORAH 10.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350439 081314 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.00 386929 8121/2014 113941 MEDICA 39.02 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350294 JOHN HAW 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.02 385930 8/21/2014 101987 MENARDS 32.88 FAUCET PARTS 00002090 350668 48681 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 32.88 385931 8/21/2014 122510 MERCHANTS OF GOLF 518.64 PUTTERS 00002092 350669 82311 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 . Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386931 8/21/2014 122510 MERCHANTS OF GOLF Continued... 518.64 385932 8121/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 74.25 LOCKASSEMBLY 00005428 350520 489727 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.25 386933 8/21/2014 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 2,600.00 TFI CERTIFICATION EXAMS 350672 2722 1470.6104 CONFERENCES ,& SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,600.00 386934 8/21/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,053.75 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001603 350364 34764 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,855.00 REPLACE CURB STOP 00001604 350365 34765 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,908.75 385936 8121/2014 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 49.53 CO2, METHAIR 350670 171106313 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 49.53 386936 8/21/2014 117724 MINNEAPOLIS /ST PAUL BUSINESS JOURNAL 196.00 SUBSCRIPTION 350671 2420852 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 196.00 386937 8/21/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 43.52 ADAPTER, COUPLING 00005504 350366 0105977 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.52 385938 8/21/2014 128914. MINUTEMAN PRESS 49.00 POSTERS 00006575 350521 15928 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 49.00 385939 8/21/2014 134703 MJL HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ED130448 ESCROW REFUND 350440 6013 EWING AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS S 2,500.00 386940 8/21/2014 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/28/14 350423 080114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/2112014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385941 8/21/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. - Continued... 324.50 350463, 92688 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 324.50 385942 8/21/2014 104350 NIKE USA INC. 92.72 STAFF SHIRTS 350675 962358094 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.23 STAFF SHIRT 350673 962494012 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.23 STAFF SHIRT 350674 962494013 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 173.18 386943 8/21/2014 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 11,224.00 WINSCRIBE INSTALL LICENSES 350367 IN52591 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11,224.00 386944 8/21/2014 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA 50.00 CARRIE DOMINO 350732 MEMBERSHIP 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50.00 386945 8/21/2014 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1,967.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 350676 080114 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1',967.00 385946 812112014 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 103.05 CASH BOX, GLOVES, PENCILS 350295 721987358001 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103.05 385947 8121/2014 134708 OPTUM 507.15 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND ,, 350677 ABDULKADIR SAAD 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 507.15 386948 8/2112014 124619 OVERHOLT, JAMES 389.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 350678 081414 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 389.76 385949 8/21/2014 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 8/19/201410:27:30 Page- 21 Business Unit YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION DRUG FORFEITURE HUMAN RESOURCES CITY HALL GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL -z TREES & MAINTENANCE 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 350679 58372 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 720.75 386960 8/21/2014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 8,434.97 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 350414 082914 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WARDEN AVE 21,267.51 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 350414 082914 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8121/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount` - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386960 8121/2014 121026: PALDA & SONS INC. Continued... 28,657.94. PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 350414 082914 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 6,541:70. PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 350414 082914 03480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON ' 293,806:27 PARTIAL'PAYMENT NO. 3 350414 082914. 05538.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 107;068.46 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 350414 082914 i 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 465,776.85 386961 8/21/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,234.90 350464 8460904 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 434.49 350760 84609184N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 523.58 350390 8460927 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,192.97 386962 8/21/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 469.70 350465 00631661 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 376.70 350589 01285787 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 472.74 350524 45746770. 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 496.13 350526 45746832 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 500.20 350680 45746845 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 665.97 350525 45746847 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,981.44 385953 8121/2014 134706 PERCOLATERS, THE - 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/31/14 350424 080114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 386954 8/2112014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 111.41 350391 2647979 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 561.18 350761 2651496 5822.5513 -COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 114.32 350593 2651497 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.32 350469 2651498 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.16 350762 2651499 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 429.82 350590 2651500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 287.96 350763 2651501 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING " 2,055.95 350592 2651503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.16 350595 2651504 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,680.94 350591 2651505 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 204.43 350594 2651506 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,539.66 350468 2651507 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 489.91 350466 2651508 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 882.34 350467 2651509 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLIN" R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/21/2014 — 8121/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386954 8/21/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 162.32- 350470 3532607 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,336.24 385965 8/21/2014 100119 PING 594.44 . IRONS SET 350682 12402105 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 357.55 GOLF CLUBS 350681 12420946 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 951.99 385966 8/21/2014 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 359.87 HYDRAULIC HOSE REPAIR 350527 S1956820.001 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 359.87 385967 8/21/2014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 350368 081314 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 385968 8/21/2014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 194.88 NEIGHBORHOOD MAILINGS 350733 081814POSTAGE 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 194.88 385959 8/21/2014 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO. 1,050.00 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00001596 350683 1454 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,050.00 385960 8121/2014 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 140.41 609425 WATER 350734 609425 -7/14 5310.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 28.10 622833 WATER 350735 622833 -7/14 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 168.51 385961 8/21/2014 134707 PROVO, CURT 84.74 OFFICE DEPOT CARTRIDGE 350528 REIMBURSE 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 84.74 385962 8/21/2014 104455 PUPPE, RICHARD 244.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 350296 080614 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 244.96 386963 8/21/2014 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. .823.05 CRS2 350298 4379 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 931.86 CRS2 350297 4413 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385963 8/21/2014 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. Continued... 1,754.91 385964 8/2112014 126321 REACH WITH ME 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 24 Business Unit 1,176.00 KID N' PLAY FACILITATION 350299 21106 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 1,176.00 60.22 CANDY MACHNE SUPPLY 350687 080714 7410.5510 385965 8/21/2014 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 60.22 74,405.52 BID #2 50TH & FRANCE 350415 #2 6/30/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 167,765.25 BID #2 50TH & FRANCE 350416 #2 7/31/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 242,170.77 10.00 GARDEN PLOT #50 REFUND 350441 REFUND 1600.4390.52 385966 8/21/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 10.00 134.88 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 350685 00302038 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 158.86 SOFTENER SALT 00001545 350686 00302823 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 293.74 36.30 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 350688 081514 5120.6406 385967 8121/2014 117807 SAM'S CLUB 49.08 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 350688 P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 60.22 CANDY MACHNE SUPPLY 350687 080714 7410.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD PSTF_ADMINISTRATION 60.22 385968 8/21/2014 134704 SANDBERG, RITA 10.00 GARDEN PLOT #50 REFUND 350441 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.00 386969 8/21/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 36.30 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 350688 081514 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 49.08 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 350688 081514 5110.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 350688 081514 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 111.56 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 350688 081514 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 256.94 386970 8/21/2014 134711 SHEPHERD, CRAIG 321.84 ICE TIME 350689 REFUND 5501.4556 ICE RENTAL ICE ARENA REVENUES 321.84 385971 8121/2014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 63.00 ARCSERVE SUPPORT 350442 B02312658 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 597.00 ARCSERVE SUPPORT 350443 B02312663 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 971.00 ARCSERV SUPPORT 350444 B02312668 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1.631.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 645.00 ALARM SERVICE CITY OF EDINA ALARM SERVICE 1,140.00 385977. 8121/2014 132195 SMALL LOT MN 101.00 Council Check Register by GL 385978 8121/2014 134693 SMITH, JULIA 75.00 REFUND FOR NON USE Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 8/2112014 - 8/2112014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386971 8/21/2014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Continued... 386972 8/21/2014 134694 SIDEWALK SAVERS LLC 7,750.00 REMOVE SIDEWALK TRIP HAZARDS 350300 10020 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7,750.00 385973 8/21/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 60.00 DISPLAY SIGNS 350301 8035 5822.6575 PRINTING 60.00 DISPLAY SIGNS 350301 8035 5842.6575 PRINTING 60.00 DISPLAY SIGNS 350301 8035 5862.6575 PRINTING 180.00 385974 8121/2014 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 291.70 TIME CLOCK RENTAL 350736 13066499 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 291.70 386975 8/2112014 134699 SIMON, WANETTA 91.70 124230 350445 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES REFUND 91.87 131136 350445 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES REFUND 92.44 131109 350445 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES REFUND 92.44 130463 350445 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES REFUND 93.01 130309 350445 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 385976 8/2112014 106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 645.00 ALARM SERVICE 495.00 ALARM SERVICE 1,140.00 385977. 8121/2014 132195 SMALL LOT MN 101.00 101.00 385978 8121/2014 134693 SMITH, JULIA 75.00 REFUND FOR NON USE 75.00 REFUND 350690 80393451 1470.6180 350691 80397417 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8/1912014 10:27:30 Page - 25 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POOL ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 350471 860 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 350302 FIELD RENTAL 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 40.00 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 386982 8121/2014 134700 SPOK INC. Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 107.28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary X0319246H 1400.6151 107.28 8/21/2014 - 8121/2014 385983 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385978 8/21/2014 PLC PROGRAMMING 00001843 134693 SMITH, JULIA 1415 5934.6180 Continued... 300.00 386979 .8/21/2014 100430 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 386984 8/2112014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 166.78 PULLER SET 00005464 350737 ARV/23243829 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3604 166.78 126.00 386980 812112014 386985 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 1,952.63 94.23 350395 1191377 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,451.25 350474 1191919 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 254.28 350475 1191920 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,566.71 350472 1191921 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,041.54 350473 1191922 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 108.75 350394 1191923 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,560.75 350392 1191924 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,738.90 350393 1191925 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 197.25 350596 1192553 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 699.00 350764 1193237 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 284.00- 350396 9038623 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 18, 287.06 385981 8/21/2014 106152 SPAIN, MARK - PW 40.00 SAFETY BOOTS 350303 081114 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION r 40.00 386982 8121/2014 134700 SPOK INC. 107.28 PAGERS 350446 X0319246H 1400.6151 107.28 385983 8121/2014 122465 • SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 300.00 PLC PROGRAMMING 00001843 350692 1415 5934.6180 300.00 386984 8/2112014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 350597 3604 5862.5514 126.00 386985 8121/2014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 94.23 PAINT 350529 081314 5410.6406 94.23 385986, 8/21/2014 102639 STROHMYER, TOM EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION r R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8121/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 385986 8/21/2014 102639 STROHMYER, TOM Continued... 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/26/14 350420 080114 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 385987 8121/2014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 2,054.64 TIRES 00005502 350306 10126939 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.00 TIRES 00005590 350532 10127156 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,244.64 385988 8/21/2014 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 155.20 GOLF BAG 350693 191496 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 155.20 385989 8/21/2014 133163 SUPERIOR PAINTING & DECORATING INC. 5,424.50 BID #5 50TH & FRANCE 350417 #5 7/31/14 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 5,424.50 385990 8/21/2014 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 1,111.45 FUNGICIDE 00006222 350533 10348 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,102.12 FUNGICIDE 00006226 350534 10357 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,213.57 385991 8121/2014 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 400.00 MOVIE RENTAL 350694 DB1957085 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 400.00 385992 8/2112014 130076 TARGET CORPORATION 73,687.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 350447 POND EXPANSION 5930.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS STORM SEWER BALANCE SHEET 73,687.00 385993 8/21/2014 104932 TAYLOR MADE 157:34 MERCHANDISE 350695 30048801 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 157.34 385994 8/21/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 436.00 350536 00772136 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 528.00 350537 00772151 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 452.65 350535 840765 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 161.25 350599 841443 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.65 350600 841444 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,378.90 350598 841447 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 385994 812112014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Continued... 7,012.45 385996 8/21/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 273.50 8/4/14 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 350539 M20714 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111.00 PARK BOARD MEETING 350538 M20727 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 384.50 386996 8121/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 25.15 NOZZLE 00006219 350540 10037519 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.15 386997 8/2112014 128903 TORO NSN 6,405.00 TORO IRRIGATION COMPUTER 350696 SUPPORT 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 6,405.00 385998 8/21/2014 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 270.94 COPIER USAGE 350697 259478691 7410.6575 PRINTING 270.94 385999 8/21/2014 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 7,295.00 REPLACE WATER HEATER 350698 15997 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7,295.00 386000 8/21/2014 103218 TRI -STATE BOBCAT 1,480.00 HYDO SEEDER RENTAL 350307 R21698 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,500.00 HYDO SEEDER RENTAL 350307 R21698 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 3,980.00 386001 8/21/2014 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 500.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 350448 5012115 -8/14 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 500.00 386002 8/21/2014 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 274.48 RAMP DOOR REPAIR 350699 663646 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 274.48 386003 8/2112014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 467.40 SEED 350372 32852 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 467.40 SEED 350372 32852. 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 752.00 ATHLETIC TURF MIXTURE 00001544 350700 33154 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 28 Business Unit LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS PARKADMIN. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PSTF ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES PARKING RAMP SNOW & ICE REMOVAL DISTRIBUTION COUNTRYSIDE PK`PLAYGROUND &PATI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2U14 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/21/2014 — 8121/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386.003 8/21/2014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Continued... 332.50 MULCH PELLETS, STRAW 00001583 350541 33160 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 2,019.30 386004 8/21/2014 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 154.00 JUNE 2014 UNIFORMS 350308 063014 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 3,363.19 JUNE 2014 UNIFORMS 350308 063014 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 7,936.17 JULY 2014 UNIFORMS 350309 073114 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11,453.36 386005 8/21/2014 125032 UNI- SELECT USA 886.33 PARTS 350775 073114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 886.33 386006 8/2112014 133459 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE 64.05 MOWER PARTS 350542 74010 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 64.05 386007 8/2112014 102212 UPBEAT INC 4,860.00 BENCHES 00001343 350701 552129 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 4,860.00 386008 8/21/2014 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 76.69 SHIPPING CHARGES 350543 TRAN: 9810 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 76.69 386009 8121/2014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 1,362.70 TOWELS, LINERS, CUPS, LIDS 350544 319928 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 83.54 CUPS 350545 319928 -01 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,446.24 386010 8/2112614 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,980.00 AUG 2014 SERVICE 350702 31431 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,980.00 386011 8/21/2014 120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350,546 EW687282 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8119/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6121/2014 - 8/21/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386011 8/21/2014 120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Continued... 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - GENERAL MAINTENANCE 29.38. LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING- 00080414 350546 EW687282 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS _ 139.33 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROIUGH OPERATIONS 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 29.38 LAMP AND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414. 350546 EW687282 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 429.38 LAMPAND BATTERY RECYCLING 00080414 350546 EW687282 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 833.13 386012 8/21/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 216.83 STREET LIGHTING PARTS 00001569 350703 8520321 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 216.83 386013 8121/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 351.00 350476 62416 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 171.50 350765 62420 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 522.50 - 386014 8/21/2014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 51.40 BRATS 350707 83480 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 51.40 - 386016 8121/2014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 36.30 350709 0006052 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 67.34 350709 0006052 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 89.42 350709 0006052 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 199.96 350709 0006052 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 225.65 350709 0006052 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 294.32 350709 0006052 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 394.50 350709 0006052 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 406.70 350709 0006052 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 406.70 350709 0006052 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 47.34 350709 0006052 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART C ENTER. BLDG /MAINT 55.34 350709 0006052 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 240.40 350709 0006052 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL'OPERATION 110.46 350709 0006052 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 287.25 350709 0006052 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 321.93 350709 0006052 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 333.77 350709 0006052 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 945.81 350709 0006052 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 55.34 350709 0006052 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCI'" 7Y R55CKk2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 386016 8/21/2014 386016 8/21/2014 Subledger Account Description Continued... RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL LESSONS i 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 31 Business Unit l YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES 386017 8/21/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 350767 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 615.48 8121/2014 - 8/21/2014 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No YORK SELLING 103088 .WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 350603 127.42 5842.5513 350709 0006052 5841.6182 32.39 350708 6954096 5511.6182 4,678.34 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 210.32 134709 WILLE, JOSH 515136 5842.5513 105.00 ADULT GOLF CLASS CANCELATION 350710 REFUND 5401.4602 105.00 515328 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Subledger Account Description Continued... RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL LESSONS i 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 31 Business Unit l YORK OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES 386017 8/21/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,461.92 350767 515072 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 615.48 350601 515074 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,491.44 350603 515075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,372.36 350479 515076 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 210.32 350602 515136 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 233.16 350768 515328 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,384.68 386018 8/21/2014 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 622.77 FUNGICIDE 350711 59628042 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 622.77 386019 8/21/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 213.00 - 350400 1080212610 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,115.73 350399 1080214950 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.15 350398 1080214951 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,386.10 350397 1080214952 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 106.70 350483 1080214953 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,110.92 350484 1080215094 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 606.54 350482 1080215096 5822.5512 COST OF. GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 111.08 350401 1080215098 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,516.77 350481 1080215099 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,423.55 350480 1080215100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 154.64 350402 1080215101 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 183.00 350604 1080215314 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 211.00- 350606 2080048779 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.00- 350607 2080048791 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 75.00- 350608 2080048797 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 21.00- 350609 2080048823 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 115.88- 350605 2080048965 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12,534.30 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 386019 812112014 386020 8/21/2014 386021 8/21/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 570.66 CITY OF EDINA 4,834.69 51- 5888961 -7 9,215.08 Council Check Register by GL 514197645 -8 10,414.30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 51- 5605640 -1 68,032.06 350311 8/21/2014 - 8/21/2014 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 101091 ZIEGLER INC 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 45,984.00 2014 CATERPILLAR 50,677.72 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Grand Total 280.00 350548 1090268347 5420.5514 867.00 350547 1090269136 5421.5514 5,754.05 350405 1090269911 5862.5514 246.00 350406 1090269912 5862.5514 600.00 350404 1090270296 5862.5514 1,980.70 350403, 1090270297 5862.5514 3,292.85 350409 1090271054 5842.5514 462.00 350408 1090271055 5842.5514 64.50 350407 1090271056 5842.5515 4,097.54 350774 1090273358 5862.5514 140.50 350773 1090273359 5862.5515 3,547.25 350769 1090273360 5822.5514 246.00 350771 1090273501 5822.5514 21.50 350770 1090273502 5822.5515 5,446.45 350772 1090273503 5842.5514 386021 8/21/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 570.66 51- 5619094 -8 4,834.69 51- 5888961 -7 9,215.08 51- 6824328 -7 648.96 514197645 -8 10,414.30 51- 6121102 -5 42,348.37 51- 5605640 -1 68,032.06 350311 386022 8/21/2014 122094 XCEL ENERGY 2,706.72 TRANSFORMER DAMAGE REPAIR 2,706.72 422621515 386023 8/21/2014 101091 ZIEGLER INC 4,693.72 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 45,984.00 2014 CATERPILLAR 50,677.72 WELL PUMPS 1,773,266.74 Grand Total Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Page - 32 Business Unit CLUBHOUSE. GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 350314 422440547 1552.6185 LIGHT &POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 350312 422444739 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 350313 422461778 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 350311 422593792 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 350310 422621515 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 350738 423178841 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 350712 1189149701 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 350713 E8644302 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00005172 350373 K8995101 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,750,110.51 R55CKR2 1-0c,,;,101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,773,266.74 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA 8/19/2014 10:27:30 Council Check Register by GL . Page - 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 812112014 — 8/21/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,750,110.51 A/PACH Payment 23,156.23 Total Payments 1,773,266.74 R55CKS2 . LOGIS100 Company 01000 GENERALFUND 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND .05500 . ICE ARENA FUND 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 05950 RECYCLING FUND 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT Report Totals Amount 234,434.94 11,608.42 21,520.00 644,380.20 45,984.00 668.70 55.34 15,746.77 47,455.02 12,980.43 2,824.16 6,039.67 172,198.47 365,674.75 188,479.02 800.00 571.85 1,845.00 1,773,266.74 CITY OF EDINA 8119/2014 10:27:44 Council Check Summary Page - 1 l 8/21/2014 - 8121/2014 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing popicie* and R55CKR2 LOGIS101 VERNON SELLING 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 112.78 COFFEE 351084 Council Check Register by GL 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 107.76 COFFEE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7411.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 220.54 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 163 8/28/2014 550.00 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 351297 AE1064 1556.6104 309.20 ROOT CUTTER BLADES 00001608 350842 0140735 -IN 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 167 8/28/2014 309.20 100638 BACHMAN'S 164 6128/2014 302.10 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 350779 532756 5422.6541 21.20 SHRUB REPLACEMENT 00001595 351160. '1820970 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 135.60 SHRUB REPLACEMENT 00001595 351162 1820972 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 173.20 351161 1820973 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ssn nn 166 8/28/2014 VERNON SELLING 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 112.78 COFFEE 351084 1139005 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 107.76 COFFEE 351083 9858150 7411.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 220.54 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 166 8/28/2014 132408 AUTHENTIC EDGE LLC 550.00 CVI TRAINING 351297 AE1064 1556.6104 550.00 167 8/28/2014 100638 BACHMAN'S 302.10 TREES 00006225 350779 532756 5422.6541 137.71 SHRUB REPLACEMENT 00001595 350778 534125 1470.6406 179.79 SHRUB REPLACEMENT 00001595 350778 534125 1551.6180 619.60 168 8/28/2014 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 97.55 351169 44499500 5862.5512 91.55 351166 44499600 5822.5512 73.10 351167 44499700 5822.5515 36.55 351170 44499800 5862.5515 123.55 351171 44499900 5862.5513 1,045.95 351174 44500000 5842.5513 133.05 351175 44500100 5842.5512 248.14 351173 6472300 5862.5515 53.84 351168 90721000 ': 5822.5515 163.55 351172 90721100 5862.5515 261.04 351176 90721200 5842.5515 2,327.87 169 8/28/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 46.43 MAILERS 351089 WO- 954755 -1 1600.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERALSUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 1 Business Unit SEWER CLEANING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PSTF OCCUPANCY EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 350829 764757 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 876.50 351183 765734 5822.5514 Council Check Register by GL 50TH ST SELLING 4,073.85 350831 765735 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary YORK SELLING 80.00 350830 765736 5842.5515 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 169 8/2812014 765827 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 409.65 Continued... 351182 766330 46.43 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER' YORK SELLING 9,830.80 170 8128/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 175 8/2812014 131651 DELANEY CONSULTING LLC 862.00 PAVEMENT EVALUATION 351090 8006354 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 862.00 CONSULTING FOR STAFF, 350826 1315 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 171 8/28/2014 CONSULTING FOR STAFF 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 1315 5860.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,500.00 275.55 TOUGHBOOK VERIZON CARD 351093 NN58161 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 5,367.50 CISCO FIREWALL PROJECT 351091 NQ56070 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10,729.34 CISCO FIREWALL PROJECT 351092 N063017 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 16,372.39 172 8128/2014 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 813.81 SAFETY VESTS 00003858 351149 155196 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 373.12 GAS MONITOR PARTS 00003855 351020 156980 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,186.93 173 8/28/2014 104020 DALCO 680.84 CAN LINERS, TISSUE, CLEANERS 00009354 351025 2776775 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 308.24 TOWELS 00009354 351026 2781016 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 134.75 5GAL JUGS 00001669 350844 2782224 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,123.83 174 8/28/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- 2 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,842.50 350829 764757 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 876.50 351183 765734 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,073.85 350831 765735 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 80.00 350830 765736 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,477.60 351184 765826 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 70.70 351185 765827 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 409.65 351182 766330 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER' YORK SELLING 9,830.80 175 8/2812014 131651 DELANEY CONSULTING LLC 833.33 CONSULTING FOR STAFF 350826 1315 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 833.33 CONSULTING FOR STAFF, 350826 1315 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 833.34 CONSULTING FOR STAFF 350826 1315 5860.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,500.00 176 8/28/2014 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 8122/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 176 8/28/2014 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY Continued... 64.85 BAKERY 351099 518578 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 136.96 351100 518579 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 100.08 351101 518625 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 301.89 177 8/28/2014 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 7,654.16 E -81 REPAIRS 351028 74817 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7,654.16 178 8128/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 4,964.02 350781 45248 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,602.84 CONDENSING PUMP REPAIRS 350783 45393 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 4,964.02- 350782 45394 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,602.84 179 8/28/2014 124641 GEYEN GROUP 1,042.03 CLEANING SERVICES 351107 23817 5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 1,042.03 180 8/2812014 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 39,319.00 WORKERS COMP PREMIUM 350819 185652 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 39, 319.00 181 812812014 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 297.75 DOOR REPAIRS 351030 D282545 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 297.75 182 8/28/2014 120086 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 3,546.81 AC DRIVE 350854 6711 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 3,546.81 183 8/28/2014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 213.62 TOILET RENTAL 351117 79862 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 213.62 184 8/28/2014 101483 MENARDS 159.09 REBAR, WHEELBARROW 00001598 350864 64685 47078.6710 EOUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE! 47.74 PRUNERS, SHOVEL 00001647. 350865 64786 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 9.98 MURIATIC ACID 00001656 350861 64800 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.97 SAW BLADES 00001658 350862 64856 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 184 8/28/2014 101483 MENARDS Continued... 20.88 STRAPS 00001660 350860 64862 5921.6556 TOOLS 21.40 LUMBER 00001663 350863 64879 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5422.6611 5761.6530 07114.1705.30 01406.1705.30 03479.1705.30 05537.1705.30 04395.1705.30 5720.6530 7411.6511 7411.6511 7411.6511 7411.6511 7411.6406 1553.6585 5421.5510 412.38 FAUCET 351319 52941397.001 5720.6406 412.38 i IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS REPAIR PARTS CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- 4 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING S114 GRIMES AVE SIDEWALK MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 290.06 185 812812014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,255.31 SPRINKLERS 00006229 351126 977373 -00 16.60 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00002086 351127 978057 -00 1.271.91 186 8128/2014 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 80,919.11 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 351081 082914BA -406 150,176.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 351081 082914BA -406 56,384.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 351081 082914BA -406 285,880.72 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 351081 082914BA -406 62,563.71 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 351081 082914BA -406 635,924.46 187 8/28/2014 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,804.30 PLAY STRUCTURE PARTS / MAINT 351317 2475 1,804.30 188 8/28/2014 129486 PAPCO INC. •36.59 CLEANER, PAPER BAGS 351128 87425 40.79 TOWELS 351131 87425 -1 66.67 TISSUE 351130 87455 73.15 DISINFECTANT 351129 87713 308.20 ASH CONTAINERS 351132 87717 525.40 189 8/28/2014 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 59.00 CHAIN TRAY 00005592 350868 3742 59.00 190 8/28/2014 131676 SAINT'S COMMERCIAL FOOD SERVICE 191.25 COOKIES 351135 0085487 -IN 191.25 191 8/28/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 5422.6611 5761.6530 07114.1705.30 01406.1705.30 03479.1705.30 05537.1705.30 04395.1705.30 5720.6530 7411.6511 7411.6511 7411.6511 7411.6511 7411.6406 1553.6585 5421.5510 412.38 FAUCET 351319 52941397.001 5720.6406 412.38 i IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS REPAIR PARTS CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- 4 Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING S114 GRIMES AVE SIDEWALK MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 191 8/28/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES Continued... 192 8/28/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 16.24 GASKET, SEALS 00005529 •350810 16302 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,320.16 VEHICLE REPAIR 351144 655734 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,372.95 VEHICLE REPAIR 351145 655831 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,709.35 193 8/28/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 19.95 FUSE HOLDER, CONNECTIONS 00005594 350811 4413260 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.00 BALL JOINTS 00005594 350812 4436323 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.95 194 8/2812014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 174.05 SIMTCH, STUD, RETAINER 00005589 350813 J190002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 311.61 FUEL PUMP 00006217 351147 0134463 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 2,532.51 MOTOR SERVICE KIT 00005528 351068 0134614 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,018.17 195 8128/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 791.08 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351157 40249547 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 441.87 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351156 40307888' 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,232.95 196 8/28/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 380.40 351266 .369609 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 998.50 351268 369616 -00 5842:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,415.10 351267 369722 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,794.00 386024 8/22/2014 104517 ACKER, RITA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350877 082114 1180.6013 "= SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - 173.06 386026 8/22/2014 131094 BARNES, ABIGAIL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350878 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION: 168.19 386026 8/22/2014 127094 BECKER, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350879 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION ;- 170.63 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8126/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page'- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386026 8/22/2014 127094 BECKER, MARY Continued... 386027 8122/2014 134676 BERTRAND, SHERYL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350880 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386028 8/22/2014 106479 BOEMER, JULIET L. 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350881 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386029 8/22/2014 104580. 'BRADBURY, KATHERINE 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 350882 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 386030 8122/2014 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 250.31 ELECTION JUDGE 350883 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250.31 386031 8/22/2014 106482 BRELLENTHIN, ADELE 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350884 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386032 8/22/2014 121117 BRISCOE, DAVID 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350885 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 - 386033 8/2212014 123152 BRONNER, KATHY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350886 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386034 8/22/2014 106485 BURNETT; JAMES H.. 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350887 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386035 8/22/2014 134677 CALGREN, ROBERT 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350888 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386036 8/22/2014 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350889 D82114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26;;14 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # ' Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386036 8122/2014 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE Continued... 386037 8/2212014 131095 CARDWELL, LINDA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350890 .082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386038 8/2212014 134682 CHATLEAIN, JULIE ANN 26.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350891 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 26.81 386039 8/22/2014 123166 CHRISTIANSEN, MARILYN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350892 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386040 8/22/2014 114404 CIPOLLA, JUDY 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350893 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 386041 8/22/2014 104526 COOKE, EILEEN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350894 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES - ELECTION 173.06 386042 8/22/2014 104527 CRACRAFT, JOHN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350896 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386043 8/22/2014 104528 ,CRACRAFT, MARIAN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350895 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386044 8/22/2014 104529 CREW, COLLEEN 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 350897 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 244.69 386045 8/22/2014 127416 DALE, BYRON 168:19 ELECTION JUDGE 350898 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386046 8/22/2014 127416 DALE, JUDITH 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350899 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA ELECTION Check # Date Amount Supplier./: Explanation 386046, 8/22/2014 Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12.74i6;, DALE, JUDITH 386047 8/22/2014 8122/2014. - 8/28/2014 127088 �DAUTH, DANIEL PO # Doc No 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE Business Unit 173.06 Continued... 386048 8/22/2014 082114 1180.6013 108664 DEBERG, GLORIA ELECTION 350901 247.50 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 350902 247.50 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES -- 386049 8/22/2014 .082114 1180.6013 123168 DEMAREST, AMY ELECTION 350904 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 350905 168.19 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 386050 8/22/2014 106613 DEZELLER, DELPHA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 386051 8/22/2014 104631 DILL, PATRICIA 241.88 ELECTION JUDGE 241.88 386052 8/22/2014 130722 DIMMOCK, JOHN 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 175.50 386053 8/22/2014 130723 DONOVAN, WENDY 241.88 ELECTION JUDGE 241.88 386054 8/22/2014 134678 DRAKE, FRANK 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 386055 8122/2014 123160 DUKE, SONTRUD 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 386066 8/22/2014 134679 DULAS, KIM 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 350906 082114 350907 082114 350908 082114 350909 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 CITY OF EDINA ELECTION 8/26/2014 10:55:15 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES Council Check Register by -GL 1180.6013 Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8122/2014. - 8/28/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 350900 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350901 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES' ELECTION 350902 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350903 .082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350904 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350905 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350906 082114 350907 082114 350908 082114 350909 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation P 386056 8/22/2014 1180.6013 134679 DULAS, KIM 386057 8/22/2014 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 130724 EBERLEIN, EMMA 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 247.50 ELECTION JUDGE O # Doc No Inv No Account No 247.50 Business Unit 386058 8/22/2014 Continued... 130725 EBERLEIN, ERIKA 350911 082114 1180.6013 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 350910 082114 1180.6013 233.44 ELECTION 386069 8/22/2014 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 120646 ELLINGBOE, ANNA 350913 082114 1180.6013 251.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350914 082114 1180.6013 251.06 ELECTION 386060 8/22/2014 116948 FIEDLER, BOB 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 386061 8/22/2014 104634 FINK, PAUL 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 236.25 386062 8/22/2014 127086 FOSSUM, JOHN 253.13 ELECTION JUDGE 253.13 386063 8/22/2014 130726 FULUVAKA, SUZANNE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 386064 8/22/2014 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE 267.19 ELECTION JUDGE 267.19 386065 8/22/2014 116951 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH 255.94 ELECTION JUDGE 255.94 386066 8/22/2014 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE III 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 350915 082114 350916 082114 350917 082114 350918 082114 350919 082114 1180.6013 CITY OF tDINA ELECTION 8/26/2014 10:55:15 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES Council Check Register by GL 1180.6013 Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 O # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 350911 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350910 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350912 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350913 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350914 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350915 082114 350916 082114 350917 082114 350918 082114 350919 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8122/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386066 8/2212014 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE III Continued... 386067 8/22/2014 106566 HAMAN, EUGENE E. 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350920 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239.06 386068 8/22/2014 120269 HANSEN, BRIAN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350921 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386069 8122/2014 120244 HASNUDEEN, BUDDY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350922 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386070 8/22/2014 106576 HELEY, CHERYL 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350923 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 230.63 386071 8/22/2014 127429 HIGGINS, JAMES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350924 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 386072 8/22/2014 134680 HOGLIN, SANDRA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350925 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386073 8/22/2014 130728 HOLST, ALAN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350926 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386074 8/22/2014 105396 HOPF, NANCY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350927 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386075 8/22/2014 117139 HOPPE, JUDY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350928 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 386076 8/22/2014 108573 HUDOBA, TERRI 247.50 ELECTION JUDGE 350929 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 247.50 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 10 Business Unit ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION R55CKR2 L6GIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 8/2212014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description' Business Unit 386076 8/22/2014 108573 HUDOBA, TERRI Continued... 386077 8/2212014 105397 HYKES, MYRA .233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 350930 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 386078 622/2014 134681 JAISLE, CECILIA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350931 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386079 8/22/2014 130730 JELLEN, ROSEMARY 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350932. 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386080 8/2212014 120376 JIWANI, SUZANNE 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350933 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386081 8/22/2014 106698 JOHNSON, ALLEN C. ` 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350936 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386082 8/22/2014 134683 JOHNSON, GRANT 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350934 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 3860813 8/2212014 106600 JOHNSON, SHIRLEY M. 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350935 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386084 8/22/2014 106608 KACHAN, MARY K. 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350937 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386085 8/22/2014 106538 KAPAUN, ANN - 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350938 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386086 8/22/2014 123513 KATZ, DALIA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350939 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 386086 8/22/2014 082114 123513 KATZ, DALIA 386087 8122/2014 350948 134684 KECK, PAUL 1180.6013 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 250.31 ELECTION JUDGE PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 250.31 Business Unit 386088 812212014 Continued... 123176 KELLAMS, LOUISE 350940 082114 1180.6013 26.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350941 082114 1180.6013 26.81 ELECTION 386089 8122/2014 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106641 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 350943 082114 1180.6013 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350944 082114 1180.6013 173.06 ELECTION 386090 8/22/2014 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 105399 KOESTER, MARCIA 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 236.25 . 386091 8/22/2014 106543 KOPP, JANET 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 386092 8/22/2014 106545 KOSTERS, JULIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 386093 8/22/2014 120381 KOUATLI, MARTHA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 386094 8/22/2014 130764 KOUDSI, HANA 26.81, ELECTION JUDGE 26.81 386095 8/22/2014 134685 LABONNE, JUDY 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 386096 8/22/2014 123179 LANDBERG, JAMES 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 173.06 350946 CITY OF EDINA 1180.6013 8/26/2014 10:55:15 ELECTION' Council Check Register by GL 082114 Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 350948 082114 1180.6013 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 ELECTION 350949 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 350940 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350941 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350942 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350943 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350944 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ` ELECTION 350945 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350946 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION' 350947 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 'ELECTION 350948 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 350949 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386096 8/22/2014 123179 .LANDBERG, JAMES Continued... 386097 8/2212014 106550 LANDBERG, MARY 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 350950 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 244.69 386098 8122/2014 123180 LANZ, KAREN 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 350951 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 233.44 386099 8/22/2014 127437 LAPPIN, GERTRUDE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE .350952 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386100 8/22/2014 123523 LINDSAY, SUSAN 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350953 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239.06 386101 8/22/2014 127104 LOEWENBERG, ELLEN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350954 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386102 8/22/2014 127089 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA 26.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350955 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 26.81 386103 8/22/2014 120249 LUCAS, WILLIAM 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350956 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386104 8122/2014 123183 MAEDER, BARBARA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350957 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386105 8/2212014 108574 MAETZOLD, LINDA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350958 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386106 8/22/2014 134686 MALLON, ROBERT 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350959 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- .13 Business Unit ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386106 :8/22/2014 134686 MALLON, ROBERT Continued... 386107 8/22/2014 120386 MAST, BOYD 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350960 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 386108 8122/2014 130768 MAZZARA, PATTI 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 350961 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 233.44 386109 8/22/2014 106686 MCFARLANE, BARBARA 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 350962 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 233.44 386110 8/22/2014 106589 MCGOLDRICK, FRANCIS 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350963 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386111 8/22/2014 123186 MCKUSICK, SUSAN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350964 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386112 8/22/2014 127092 MCMILLAN, JOAN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350965 082114 1180.6013 _ SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386113 8/22/2014 120250 MENZEL, MAWN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350966 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386114 8/22/2014 104548 MERRITT HOLMES, PAT 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350967 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 386115 8/22/2014 116961 MILLER, NANCY 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350968 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239.06 386116 8/22/2014 104551 MONTGOMERY, BETH 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350969 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 227.81 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- 14 Business Unit ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386116 8/22/2014 104551 MONTGOMERY, BETH Continued... 386117 8/22/2014 104552 MOON, JON 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350970 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 170.63 386118 8/22/2014 134687 MURPHY, GREGORY 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350971 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386119 8122/2014 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN 26.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350972 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 26.81 386120 8/22/2014 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 255.94 ELECTION JUDGE 350973 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 255.94 386121 8/22/2014 120254 O'NEILL, ORDELL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350974 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 386122 8/2212014 123194 OWENS, NORMAN 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350975 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239.06 386123 8/22/2014 106631 PAULSON, DARLA J 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350976 .082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386124 8122/2014 123195 PEARCE, WAIN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350977 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 386125 8/22/2014 134688 PFANNENSTEIN, RONALD 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350978 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 386126 8/22/2014 104656 POLLITT, BETTY 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- 15 Business Unit - ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION ELECTION 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350979 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386126 8122/2014 104656 POLLITT, BETTY Continued... 386127 8/22/2014 119667 RA21DLO, TERESA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350980 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386128 8/22/2014 130770 REHM, ERIC 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350981 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386129 8/22/2014 129967 RISSER, JULIE 247.50 ELECTION JUDGE 350982 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 247.50 386130 8/22/2014 104622 ROACH, JENNIFER 250.31 ELECTION JUDGE 350983 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 250.31 386131 8/22/2014 106275 RODGERS, JUDITH 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 350984 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 386132 8/22/2014 127081 RODGERS, WILLIAM - 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350985 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386133 8/22/2014 120260 ROHLF, ROBERT 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350986 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386134 8122/2014 130771 ROSENTHAL- ERICKSON, LUANN 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350987 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 230.63 386135 8/22/2014 130772 ROTHE, CAROL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350988 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386136 8122/2014 123637 RUSH, MILAGROS 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350989 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386136 .8122/2014 123537 RUSH, MILAGROS Continued... 386137 8/22/2014 106587 SCHRAMM, CONSTANCE E. 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350990 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386138 8/22/2014 134689 SCHULTZ, CAROL 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350991 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386139 8/22/2014 134690 SCHWAPPACH, NANCY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350992 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386140 8122/2014 116970 SCHWIEBERT, SARA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350993- = 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386141 8/22/2014 127100 SEDOFF, MARILYN 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 350994 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 386142 8/22/2014 106595 SELID, MARION P. 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350995 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386143 8122/2014 124803 SKELLY, MICHAEL 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 350996 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386144 8/22/2014 123204 SKOY, MARY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350997 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386145. 8122/2014 123205 SKUMATZ, JOANN 166.19 ELECTION JUDGE 350998 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386146 8/22/2014 133175 SMITH, DEL 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 351000 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 386146 8/22/2014 133175 SMITH, DEL 386147 8/22/2014 350999 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 253.13 ELECTION JUDGE 082114 1180.6013 253.13 ELECTION 386148 .8/22/2014 1180.6013 134691 STANTON, MARY ELECTION 351003 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 082114 386149 8122/2014 ELECTION 123208 STEBLAY, VIVIAN 082114 1180.6013 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE, 351006 082114 173.06 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 386150 8/22/2014 082114 131137 STONE, JAN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 173.06 351009 386151 8/22/2014 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 123210 SWEET, PHILOTHEA 168.19 ELECTON JUDGE 168.19 386152 8/22/2014 112754 THORNDYKE, KATY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 386163 8/22/2014 116976 TIGGAS, ANDREA 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 236.25 386154 8/2212014 123645 TURNBULL, JULIE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 386155 8/22/2014 106629 ULVIN, JANET M 255.94 ELECTION JUDGE 255.94 386156 8/22/2014 129679 WALDIN, DEB .168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 168.19 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 350999 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351001 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351002 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351003 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351004 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351005 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351006 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351007 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351008 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 351009 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - R55CKR2 LuGIS101 CITYOF'rDINA 8/26/201410:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386156 8/22/2014 129679 WALDIN, DEB Continued... 386157 8/22/2014 130776 WALLANDER, DONNA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 351010' `082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386158 8/22/2014 106638 WASHBURN, VIRGINIA 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 351011 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 386159 8/22/2014 116981 WEBER, JENNY 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 351012 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 210.94 386160 8/22/2014 123212 WEHRMEISTER, PAUL 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 351013 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 386161 8/22/2014 134692 WEISER, JOHN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 351014 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 386162 8/2212014 130777 WENGER, WAYNE 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE_ 351015 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 386163 8/22/2014 104634 YEE, MARY 258.75 ELECTION JUDGE 351016 082114 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 258.75 386164 .8/28/2014 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 151.64 HOSE, GASKETS, CLAMPS 00005498 350796 1- 860140 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.64 386165. 8/28/2014 129458 ACME TOOLS 235.00 GRINDER 00005629, 350776 2805893 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.99 DRILL BITS 00001676 351050 2813060 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 381.99 386166 8/28/2014 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 109.77 ALARM MONITORING 351017 518624699 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50.75 CITY OF EDINA 62876 1,748.75 Council Check Register by GL 386171 8/28/2014 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 100.00 " 350777 115656 8/22/2014 - 6/28/2014 WINCH 00005568 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386166 8/28/2014 8/28/2014 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 134723 BALLARD, JEFF Continued... 109.77 KID N' PLAY CAMP REFUND 351051 REFUND 386167-.,8/28/2014 54.00 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 386173 8/2812014 118883 BAN -KOE SYSTEMS INC. 267.59 CO2 351292 31593634 5330.6545 CHEMICALS ALARM PANEL 351086 267.59 296.50 386174 8/28/2014 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 386168 8/28/2014 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE GENERAL LABOR CONSULTING 350815 134186 83.45 FOOD 351082 408150486 5421.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,153.62 FOOD 351082 408150486 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 685.24 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351293 408190074 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 686.62 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351295 408210352 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 369.64 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351294 408220559 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,978.57 . 386169 8/28/2014 134727 AREAUX, RAY 98.00 REFUND FOR CLASSES 351296 081814 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 98.00 ' 386170 8/28/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,018.00 351165 62874 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 68000 351163 62875 5842 5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 1553.6180 1553.6530 1600.4390.52 5511.6136 1170.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR. PARTS 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 20 Business Unit FLOWRIDER GRILL GRILL POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONSEDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ICE ARENA REVENUES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, HUMAN RESOURCES 50.75 351164 62876 1,748.75 386171 8/28/2014 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC. 100.00 REPAIR 00005596 350777 115656 345.95 WINCH 00005568 351085 156045 445.95 386172 8/28/2014 134723 BALLARD, JEFF 54.00 KID N' PLAY CAMP REFUND 351051 REFUND 54.00 386173 8/2812014 118883 BAN -KOE SYSTEMS INC. 296.50 ALARM PANEL 351086 75058 296.50 386174 8/28/2014 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 512.00 GENERAL LABOR CONSULTING 350815 134186 512.00 5862.5514 1553.6180 1553.6530 1600.4390.52 5511.6136 1170.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR. PARTS 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 20 Business Unit FLOWRIDER GRILL GRILL POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONSEDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ICE ARENA REVENUES VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, HUMAN RESOURCES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 8/28/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 130922 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 8/26/2014 10:55:15 ` 2,800.00 RETIREMENT GIFT CARDS Council Check Register by GL -ME- 670969 Page- 21 2,800.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 386181 8128/2014 102648 BOOSALIS, DAVID 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386174 8/28/2014 446.48 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD Continued... 386175 8/28/2014 101343 BEHR, JASON BOURGET IMPORTS 53.44 K9 BOARDING 350816 082014 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 53.44 386176 8/28/2014 120517 BEITEL, DAWN CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 239.68 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 351298 082014 5710.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 239.68 351180 390322 5822.5514 386177 8128/2014 6,469.90 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 350828 390323 5842.5514 144.00 PIZZA 351087 D281N2497 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 792.00 PIZZA 351299 D28IN2512 5320.5510 COST_ OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 936.00 386178 8/28/2014 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 9/11/14 351291 082014 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 386179 8/28/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 128.70 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351088 155295 5520 -5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 386180 8/28/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 130922 BI WORLDWIDE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX ` 2,800.00 RETIREMENT GIFT CARDS 351300 -ME- 670969 1556.6406 2,800.00 386181 8128/2014 102648 BOOSALIS, DAVID 446.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 351301 082114 1400.6203 446.48 386182 8/28/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 636.52 351178 121578 5842.5513 636.52 386183 8/28/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 110.85 351179 389539 5430.5510 1,786.90 351180 390322 5822.5514 6,469.90 350828 390323 5842.5514 46.45 350827 394683 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 EP-ENTER INMENT 9/7/14 351289 082014 5710.6136 CITY OF EDINA EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 Council Check Register by GL 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 351304 200650009 -8/14 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 404.14 00082050- 0200650018 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 1551.6189 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386183 8/2812014 00086676 - 0330288022 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5310.6189 SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION Continued... 00105263 - 0335037016 351095 8,414.10 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 896.51 00113607 - 0342163045 351019 386184 8/28/2014 SEWER & WATER 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 87.24 350780 081114 1628.6186 HEAT 250.60 350780 081114 1552.6186 HEAT 393.50 ` 350780 081114 1646.6186 HEAT 364.28 350780 081114 5111.6186 HEAT 31.44 350780 081114 5422.6186 HEAT 48.18 350780 081114 5430.6186 HEAT 124.49 350780 081114 5420.6186 HEAT 3,870.55 350780 081114 5511.6186 HEAT 129.43 350780 081114 5761.6186 HEAT 15.49 350780 081114 5821.6186 HEAT 33.62 350780 081114 5861.6186 HEAT 37.19 350780 081114 5841.6186 HEAT 102.71 350780 081114 5921.6186 HEAT 119.98 350780 081114 5913.6186 HEAT 1,638.46 350780 081114 5911.6186 HEAT 7,247.16 386185 8/2812014 123898 CENTURYLINK 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - . 22 SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION WELL PUMPS 60.01 952 944 -6522 351018 6522 -8/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 60.01 L 386186 8128/2014 100683 CHEMSEARCH 614.16 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 351094 1603187 5511.6136. PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 614.16 386187 8/28/2014 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 200.00 EP-ENTER INMENT 9/7/14 351289 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 386188 8/28/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 794.42 00082050- 0200650009 351304 200650009 -8/14 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 404.14 00082050- 0200650018 351303 200650018 -8/14 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 93.53 00082198 - 0200815001 351305 200815001 -8/14 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 1,001.97 00086676 - 0330288022 351302 330288022 -8/14 5310.6189 SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION 459.02 00105263 - 0335037016 351095 335037016 -8/14 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 896.51 00113607 - 0342163045 351019 342163045 -8/14 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,649.59 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386188 812812014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued... 386189 8/28/2014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 497.28 351181 0128343912 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 497.28 386190 8/28/2014 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 825.99 SEPT 2014 SERIVCE 351021 082114 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 825.99 386191 8128/2014 120433 COMCAST 170.14 8772 10 614 0496856 351096 496856 -8114 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 170.14 386192 8/28/2014 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 28,914.71 HOT MIX 351097 081514 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 28,914.71 386193 8128/2014 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 135.35 FORM TUBE, REBAR 00001659 350843 0115611 -IN 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 135.35 386194 8/2812014 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 831.46 CLAY 00009347 351024 INV000089698 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 658.23 CLAY, ART SUPPLIES 00009352 351022 INV000090210 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 37.45 VACUUM GAUGE 00009349 . 351023 INV000090721 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,527.14 386195 8/28/2014 134650 CRAWFORD, LINDY 14.67 MEETING REFRESHMENTS 351322 082014 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 14.67 386196 8/28/2014 102596 CROWN TROPHY 219.45 PLATE ENGRAVING 351098 5620 2610.6575 PRINTING PUBLICART 219.45 386197 8/28/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 128.58 SOCKET, BATTERY TESTERS 00005454 350797 923482 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.37 HEX BITS, UTILITY KNIFE 00001549 350845 924698 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 118.75 MINI IMPACT WRENCH 00005461 351052 925881 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. 275.63 OXYFUEL TOTE 00005630 351053 929915 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 840.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL CAUSTIC SODA 351306 827001453 -14 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 868.84 8122/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386197 8/28/2014 386200 8/28/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 556.33 12,652.64 386198 8/28/2014 LIGHTS 00001577 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 11134600 1551.6406 26.50 650487671 351102 650487671 -8/14 5510.6575 PRINTING ' 26.50 11138600 1551.6406 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 24 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION 386199 8/2812014 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 840.00 868.84 CAUSTIC SODA 351306 827001453 -14 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 868.84 12,652.64 GYM OPERATIONS /MAINTENANCE 351027 386200 8/28/2014 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,652.64 1.16 LIGHTS 00001577 350846 11134600 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 58.59 LIGHTS 00001587 350847 11138600 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 59.75 351054 AW081214 -14 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT. REPLACEMENT 386201 8/28/2014 106224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 386204 840.00 5K ON 7/17/14 350817 ESPIRITE DE SHE 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POLICE EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL STORM SEWER 840.00 386202 8128/2014 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 12,652.64 GYM OPERATIONS /MAINTENANCE 351027 16889 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,652.64 386203 8/28/2014 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,373.83 SUV CARGO STORAGE 00003077 351054 AW081214 -14 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT. REPLACEMENT 1,373.83 386204 8/28/2014 134661 ESP IT 3,608.00 IT CONSULTING 351103 9791 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,608.00 386205 8/28/2014` 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 15,716.00 MANHOLE LIDS, RINGS 00001249 350848 TT4149 5932.6536 CASTINGS 15, 716.00 386206 8/2812014 134728 ESSO PROPERTIES LLC 100.78 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 351307 5221 56TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 100.78 386207 8/28/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POLICE EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 103.94 CITY OF EDINA 386211 8/28/2014 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary SENSORS 00005598 351059 01431504 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 2,581.25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386207 8/28/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 120.71- CREDIT 351057 1- 4510191 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS LAUNDRY 60.00- CREDIT 351058 1- 4510192 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 92.04 PARTS 351104 1- 4513853 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 66.34 BATTERIES 350799 1- ZO1952 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 189.23 BATTERIES 350798 69- 148585 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS PLANTS, FLOWERS 351108 69.42 BATTERIES 350849 69- 148902 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 188.25 5.38 FUEL CAP 351055 69- 149045 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS .- 8/28/2014 22.98 HALOGEN SEALED BEAMS 351056 69- 149176 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 264.68 PAINT 00005566 351060 9517540457 1553.6406 386208 8/28/2014 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE KEY BOX 00006269 351111 9517540465 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 419.69 COFFEE 351105 60105149 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 419.69 386209 8/28/2014 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 4.03 FASTENERS 00005626 350800 MNTC2125700 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4.03 386210 8/28/2014, 101476 FOOTJOY 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 25 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.94 RAINPANTS 351106 5774595 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF DOME PROGRAM 103.94 386211 8/28/2014 102727 FORCE AMERICA 2,581.25 SENSORS 00005598 351059 01431504 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 2,581.25 386212 8/28/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP RAGS 351109 1006439443 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 15.00 SHOP RAGS 351110 1006462141 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 30.00 386213 8128/2014 123080 GARDENVIEW GREENHOUSE 188.25 PLANTS, FLOWERS 351108 475493 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION 188.25 386214 8/28/2014 101103 GRAINGER 23.94 PAINT 00005566 351060 9517540457 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 36.60 KEY BOX 00006269 351111 9517540465 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.54 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386215 8/28/2014 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC Continued... 312.00 351186 00031602 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 312.00 386216 8/28/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,004.75 351187 170646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.25 351188 170648 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,151.00 386217 8/28/2014 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 335.06 LIGHTING 00005564 350850` 974197701 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 335.06 386218 8/28/2014 133936 HALF PINT HORSE FOUNDATION 750.00 HORSE CAMP 350818 40 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 750.00 386219 8/28/2014 133936 HALF PINT HORSE FOUNDATION 100.00. EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/4/14 351287 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 386220 8/28/2014 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/4/14 351288 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER- EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 386221 812812014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 6,195.90 CHEMICALS 00001246 350801 3630290 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 8,002.92 CHEMICALS 00001250 350852 3631950 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,796.71 CHEMICALS 00001246 350851 3633671 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 340.79 CHLORINE 351308 3633696 5311.6545. CHEMICALS POOL OPERA_ TION 21,336.32 386222 8128/2014 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 307.86 PVC PIPE 00001592 350853 C813488 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 307.86 386223 8/2812014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 191.52 BEEF PATTIES 351112 025302 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 191.52 386224 8/28/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER R55CKR2 LVGIS101 8128/2014 126816 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL SPRINKLER ROTOR 351114 081314 01395.1705.31 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 12.20 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 386228 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386224 8/28/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 417.40 Continued... 351310 785.50 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 351113 2ND HALF 2014 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 11,726.49 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 351113 2ND HALF 2014 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 8/28/2014 1,905.31 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 351113 2ND HALF 2014 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,417.30 201.00 386225 8/28/2014 21986 134729• HER, CHUE AND NAHOKO 420.00 185.94 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 351309 5125 WILLIAM 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 510.00 AVE 22179 5842.5514 185.94. 84.00 386226 8128/2014 22183 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,215.00 1,070.00 350832 717199 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8128/2014 2,488.00 100814 351190 718298 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 113.00 351191 718305 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 350855 1,333.00 5915.6530 351189 718347 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VALVES 4,621.50 351061 351192 718629 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 386227 8128/2014 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 12.20 SPRINKLER ROTOR 351114 081314 01395.1705.31 12.20 386228 8/28/2014 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 417.40 351310 608279828 1554.6188 417.40 386229 8/28/2014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 201.00 351195 21986 5862.5514 420.00 351193 22146 5822.5514 510.00 351196 22179 5842.5514 84.00 351194 22183 5862.5514 1,215.00 386230 8128/2014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 91.75 TUBING 00001594 350855 862307 5915.6530 71.40 VALVES 00001644 351061 862535 5915.6406 163.15 386231 8/28/2014 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES LLC 7,832.31 2014 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 350784 080719 2310.6230 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES TELEPHONE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 27 Business Unit GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 50TH STREET GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING BRAEMAR HILLS B CENT SERV GEN - MIS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT . E911 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8122/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386231 8128/2014 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES LLC Continued... 7,832.31 386232 8/28/2014 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION LLC 104.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 350820 1390 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 104.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 350821 1392 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 208.00 386233 8/28/2014 119808 INTEGRA 27.74 MONTHLY SERVICE 351115 12268572 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.74 386234 8/2812014 132376 INTEGRITY GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC 85.32 SERVER HARD DRIVE 351120 76934 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 186.69 SERVER HARD DRIVE 351119 77191 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 272.01 386236 8/28/2014 104167 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC. 125.00 DUES - JEFF SIEMS 351029 082014 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 386236 8/28/2014 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 49.58 350795 073114 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 60.74 350795 073114 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 128.05 350795 073114 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 192.97 350795 073114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 431.34 386237 8/28/2014 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 416.36 350802 UTILITIES -7/14 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 416.36 386238 8/2812014 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING - 84.00 EQUIPMENT CARDS 00005627 350803 65704 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.00 386239 8/28/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 800.00 CERTIFICATION PROJECT 351116 JJ5482 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 800.00 386240 8/2812014 121076 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 FOAM MARKER 00006227 351118 69220807 5422.6545 Council Check Register by GL 38.55 Page- 29 350857 69253802 47078.6710 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 386244 8/28/2014 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386240 8/28/2014 7,587.55 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 351204 1929312 Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 244.65 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 350856 79779 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 51.50 1929315 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2.32 386241 8/28/2014 1929316, 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 170.04 351226 1929318 2,981.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 350833 2241789 5822.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 2,152.90 2.32 351200 2255042 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 21.50 351199 2255043 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,723.76 28.65 351209 351198 2255045 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,945.85 1929325 351201 2255048 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 351211 39.05 5842.5513 351203 2255049 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1929327 108.00 - COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 351202 2255056 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 555.40 1,254.46 351197 2262903 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 15,832.65 351213 1929330 5842.5512 _ COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 386242 8/28/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 161.00 FOAM MARKER 00006227 351118 69220807 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 38.55 IRRIGATION PART 00001582 350857 69253802 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 199.55 386244 8/28/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 46.87 350834 1925510 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7,587.55 351204 1929312 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 244.65 351225 1929313 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1.16 351208 1929315 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2.32 351224 1929316, 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 170.04 351226 1929318 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .29 351219 1929319 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2.32 351205 1929320 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - 649.94 351227 1929322 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,723.76 351209 1929324 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,212.76 351214 1929325 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,976.16 351211 1929326 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 210.23 351210 1929327 5842.5512 - COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 11,234.44 351207 1929328 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,254.46 351212 1929329 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 33.16 351213 1929330 5842.5512 _ COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 4,047.60 351206 1929331 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,700.56 351223 1929332 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 291.39 351217 1929333 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 3,183.72 351222 1929334 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATI . YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386244 8/28/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 650.04 351216 1929335 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,513.36 351218 1929336 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,054.22 351221 1929337 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,315.96 351215 1929338 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 31.41 351220 1929339 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 598.41 351228 1929727 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 483.44- 351229 631109 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 50,453.34 386246 8/28/2014 131741 JOHNSON, EDWARD 144.29 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350822 4239 ALDEN DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 144.29 386246 8/28/2014 102603 JONAS, LENORE 95.70 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 351031 082014 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 95.70 386247 I 8/28/2014 118427 JUGHEADS 85.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/4/14 351286 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 85.00 3186248 8/28/2014 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 2,016.77 TREE REMOVAL 00001678 351032 4246 VALLEY 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE VIEW 2,016.77 386249 8/28/2014 129699 KAY, MICHAEL 218.13 LANDSCAPE REPAIRS 00001613 351311 REIMBURSE 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 218.13 386250 8/28/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 603.96 00003816 351062 249337 -04 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 603.96 UNIFORMS 00003575 351033 251547 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 260.24 00003575 351034 251547 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 175.56 00003823 351035 251862 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,643.72 386251 8/28/2014 126697 KREFTING, WAYNE 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/11114 351290 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386251 8/28/2014 126597 KREFTING, WAYNE Continued... 386252 8/28/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW CHARGE 350823 081914 2340.4761 OTHER REVENUE - GOVT FUND DWI FORFEITURE 153.74 386253 812812014 124611 LARSCO INC. 974.52 CHEM FEED EQUIPMENT 00003261 350859 3261 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 30.85 VALVES 00001572 350858 3265 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,005.37 386264 8128/2014 .100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 336.15 WASHERS, BITS, BULBS 00005549 350805 9302612378 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355.21 BITS, TERMINALS 00005526 350804 9302649297 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 691.36 . 386256 8/28/2014 128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY INC. 6,178.76 PARK &REC ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 351036 18595 1600.6575 PRINTING PARKADMIN. GENERAL 7,944.24 PARK &REC ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 351036 18595 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 14,123.00 386256 8/28/2014 100858 LOGIS 380.00 350785 38780 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,342.00 350785 38780 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,500.00 350785 38780 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,829.00 350785 38780 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,492.00 350785 38780 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,829.00 350785 38780 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,689.00 350785 38780 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,707.00 350785 38780 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 26,768.00 386257 8/28/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 1,352.58 DIESEL 351121 820287 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,352.58 386268 8/28/2014 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 140.00 PAGING SYSTEM REPAIR 351065 491585 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.00 -. 386259 8/28/2014 122654 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. - R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/2212014 — 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386259 8/28/2014 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC Continued... 178.88 OXYGEN 00003649 351037 09702744 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 178.88 ,- 386260 8/28/2014 134716 MATSON, MARCI 700.00 ABOUT TOWN COLUMNS 350824 081814 1130.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 700.00 386261 8/28/2014 134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 42,431.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 351079 082914 01411.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 7,139.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 351079 082914 04399.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 49,570.37 38626.2 8/28/2014 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 68,884.20 JULY 2014 SAC CHARGES 351323 082514 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 68,884.20 386263 8/28/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 34.88 WIRE ASSEMBLY 00005597 351063' 490352 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.88 386264 8/28/2014 100019 MIDWESTARTFAIRS 77.70 CONSIGNMENT SALES 351038 8503 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 77.70 386265 8/28/2014 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 4,205.88 FINAL PAYMENT 351078 082014A -238 01238.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 4,205.88 386266 8128/2014 134038 MIDWEST CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS LLC 54,314.64 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 351080 080414 01417.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 54,314.64 386267 8/28/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN.SEWER & WATER 2,252.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001615 351122 34769 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,060.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001614 351123 34772 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION ' 3,312.50 i - 386268 8/2812014 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 348.96 PIPE COUPLINGS 00001609 350866 0320788 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS i 371.26 COUPLINGS 00001609 351064 0320796 5923.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF't01NA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 — 8/2812014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386268 8/28/2014 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT Continued... .720.22 386269 8128/2014 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 60.00 NEWSPAPER COUPON. 350806 153075. 5822:6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 60.00 NEWSPAPER COUPON 350806 153075 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 60.00 NEWSPAPER COUPON 350806 153075 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 180.00 386270 8/28/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 194.50 ROLLED STEEL 350787- 0106179 -IN 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 152.50 WELD DOOR ON 27 -392 - 350786 0106180 -IN,- 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 347.00 ' 386271 8/28/2014 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 900.00 WEDDING AD 351125 2014 -35076 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,173.00 WEDDINGAD 351124 2014 -35447 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,073.00 386272 8/28/2014 101608 MSSA 50.00 MEMBERSHIP - SHAWN ANDERSON 351312 2014 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS - 50.00 386273 8/28/2014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 60.07 STROBE LIGHTS 00005487 350807 36509 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 641.40 LIGHTS, BEACONS 351066 36832 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 701.47 - 386274 8/28/2014 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA 250.00 FALL CONFERENCE - C. DOMINO 350788 5390026 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS - 250.00 386275 8/28/2014 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 EAP SERVICES -AUG 2014 351313 3687 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 658.75 386276 8/28/2014 106901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 4,085.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 351039 #1 BGC STUDY 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,085.00 386277 - 8/2812014 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 33 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL _ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE SUPERVISION &.OVERHEAD EQUIPMENT OPERATION -GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN HUMAN RESOURCES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES CLUB HOUSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8122/2014 - 8/28/2014 i Check '# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386277 8/28/2014 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES Continued... 932.10 LANGUAGE LINE - POLICE DEPT- 351314 20OB23024 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 24.69 351315 W14070652 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 24.69 351315 W14070652 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT-SERV GEN - MIS 49.38 351315 W14070652 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.07 351315 W14070652 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 74.31 351315 W14070652 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 172.83 351315 W14070652 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 222.21 351315 W14070652 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 49.38 351315 W14070652 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 24.69 351315 W14070652 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 98.76 351315 W14070652 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 111.12 351315 W14070652 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 111.11 351315 W14070652 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 49.38 351315 W14070652 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.07 351315 W14070652 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 74.07 351315 W14070652 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 49.38 351315 W14070652 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 260.70 351316 W14070657 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 2,476.94 3186278 8/28/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES _ 94.10 BOLTS 00005459 350808 543091 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.67 POLY SLING 00005591 350789 544020 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.77 I ' 386279 8/2812014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 969.07 351232 8461794 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.25 351231 8461805 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 609.30 - 351230 8461814 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,614.62 386280 8/28/2014 121040 PC ADVENTURES INC. 158.00 SECURITY CAMERA REPAIR 350825 9797 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 158.00 386281 8/28/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 396.24 351235 42672001 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 527.08 351234 42672006 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 456.31 351233 45746767 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,379.63 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF tDINA 8/26 014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page - 35 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386281 8/28/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued... 386282 8/28/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 113.25 351239 2654957 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.16 351242 2654958 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 428.76 351236 2654959 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,599.81 351243 2654962 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING 57.16 351245 2654963 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 823.89 351244 2654964 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,333.93 351246 2654965 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING 1,171.40 351238 2654966 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.32 351240 2654967 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,844.43 351241 2654968 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 464.86 351237 2654969 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,952.97 386283 8128/2014 134724 PISANSKY, KARINA 78.00 ART CLASS REFUND 351076 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES - 78.00 386284 - 8/28/2014 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 351318 325271 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ' 2,223.86 386286 8/28/2014 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 480.00 JACKET AND VEST 350790 FRAMED 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 480.00 386286 8/2812014 106152 POWERPLAN 265.70 FORESTRY TOOLS 00001666 350867 P06279 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 265.70 386287 8/28/2014 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 800.00 GPS DATA PLAN 351067 IN200- 1002794 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 800.00 386288 8/28/2014 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 351040 082114 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 500.00 386289 8/28/2014 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 36 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8122/2014 — 8128/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386289 8/28/2014 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. Continued... 892.80 CRS2 351133 4451 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 892.80 386290 812812014 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,148.40 FERTILIZER 00006224 351134 3027754-00 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,148.40 386291 8/28/2014 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS . 2,335.00 TURF CARE 350870 908143637 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,080.00 GRINDING /HAULING WOOD WASTE 350869 908160084 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 4,415.00 386292 8128/2014 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF . 214.05 IPHONE BUTTONS 350809 SH4237 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 214.05 3186293 8/28/2014 118168 SANSIO i 50.00 EMS FAXING 351042 INV -17521 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - 772.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 351041 INV -17673 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL I 822.00 3186294 8/28/2014 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 813.09 QUARTERLY BILLING 350871 8103797493 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 813.09 I 386295 8/2812014 124792 SCHUELLER, JASON 107.87 UNIFORM PURCHASE 351136 081814 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE I 107.87 386296 i 8/28/2014 100995 SEH 3,006.44 GOLF COURSE WETLANDS 351043 284887 2410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND I 3,006.44 I 386297 8/28/2014 134715 SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC. 142.68 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 350791 6330 XERXES AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET - 142.68 386298 8/28/2014 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 84.60 OFFICE SIGN 350792 44816 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 45.00 NAME PLATES 351137 44842 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2,001.75 CITY OF EDINA 1189551 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register by GL 351248 1194245 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1,158.75 351254 1194246 8/22/2014 — 8/28/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386298 8/28/2014 YORK SELLING 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC: Continued... 351255 129.60 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 386299 8/28/2014 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 1194249 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 26.50 HOT DOG BUNS 351138 - 247772 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1194250 5862.5513 26.50 VERNON SELLING 902.25 386300 8/28/2014 1194251 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON.SELLING 2,076.65 144.17 UNIFORM PURCHASE 351139 081514 1301.6201 LAUNDRY COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 144.17 780.50 351247 386301 8/28/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 24,312.91 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 37 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS . GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,001.75 350835 1189551 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,016.41 351248 1194245 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,158.75 351254 1194246 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,595.50 351253 1194247 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,128.48 351255 1194248 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,730.77 351252 1194249 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,919.85 351250 1194250 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 902.25 351251 1194251 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON.SELLING 2,076.65 351249 1194252 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 780.50 351247 "1195540 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24,312.91 386302 8/28/2014 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 1,680.00 141504,505,506,507,508,509 351044 'RECODE LOCKS 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,680.00 386303 8/28/2014 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 378.56 GOLF PENCILS 351142 0000734343 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 378.56 386304 8/28/2014 105387 ST. PAUL LINOLEUM 8 CARPET CO. 5,407.00 FURNISH /INSTALL CARPET 351143 0076305 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 5,407.00 386306 8/28/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 163.75 351257 3626 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 247.75 351256. 3627 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 411.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 38 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger_ Account Description Business Unit 386306 8/28/2014 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT Continued... 201.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 351140 082014 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 201.95 386307 8/2812014 118978 STOTTS, LARRY 70.67 PAINT 351141 ' 081914 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 70.67 386308 8/2812014 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 9.29 BAG PART 351146 186028 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 9.29 386309 8128/2014 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 400.00 MOVIE RENTAL 351045 DB1959634 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 400.00 386310 8/28/2014 113649 TENNIS WEST 5,900.00 REPLACE BASKETBALL HOOPS 351320 14- 007799 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATF 5,900.00 386311 8128/2014 131138 THOMPSON, ELIZA 330.00 THEATER CAMP INSTRUCTION 351077 081814 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 330.00 386312 8/28/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 34.30 351259 00721258 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 150.00- 351262 00772153 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 232.00 351261 842121 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 242.45 351260 842260 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 94.40 351258 842261 5421.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE GRILL 184.20 351263 842849 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 637.35 386313 8/28/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 163.50 ART /CULTURE MEETING MINUTES 351046 M20684 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 163.50 386314 8/28/2014 101474 TITLEIST 660.00 - HATS 351047 2467679 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 660.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Council Check Register by GL Page- 39 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386315 8/28/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. Continued... 432.00 351265 18 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 216.00 351264 183 5862.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 648.00 386316 8/28/2014 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 754.40 FILTERS 351148 0557752 -IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 754.40 386317 8/28/2014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 89.00 SEED MIXTURE 00001651 350872 33190 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 89.00 386318 8/28/2014 103973 ULINE 625.00 TOWEL DISPENSERS 00003874 351048 60750059 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 625.00 386319 812812014 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 815.16 METAL LOCATOR 00001398 350874 421550 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 297.81 ANGLE CUTTER 00001610 350873 423323 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 1,112.97 386320 8/28/2014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 334.90 CUPS, LIDS 351151 319928 -02 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 498.14 LIQUOR BAGS 351150 320240 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 228.98 LIQUOR BAGS 350793 320919 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 1,062.02 386321 8/28/2014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 705.00 TOURNAMENT FLEET,RENTAL 00006322 351152 811140002 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 116.82 BRAKE DRUM /HUB ASSEMBLIES 00006228 351154 811140012 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 392.79. BELT DRIVES 00006228 351153 813140011 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1,214.61 386322 8/28/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 332.04 351071 8456957 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 188.61 ELECTRICAL PART 351155 8508259 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 218.91 ELECTRICAL PARTS, 00001584 350876 8537327 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 110.68 351069 8546950 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 731.22 ELECTRICAL BOXES, COVERS 00001649 350875' 8551654 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 110.68- 351070 CM455575 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #' Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386322 8/28/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY Continued... 332.04- 351073 CM455576 1322.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 386323 8/28/2014 50TH ST SELLING 130839 WALTON'S HOLLOW VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 250.00 9/20/14 EVENT DEPOSIT 351049 4814DEPOSIT 1600.4390.49 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 250.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 386324 8128/2014 130574 WATSON COMPANY 478.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 351158 842585 5520.5510 478.15 386325 8/28/2014 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 93.52 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 351321 082514 1190.6107 191.54 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 351321 082514 1190.6106 285.06 386326 8/28/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,705.74 351270 515982 5842.5513 186.32 351269 515983 5862.5513 1,892.06 386327 8128/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 900.65 350836 1080215095 5822.5513 322.30 351273 1080216333 5862.5513 299.36 351275 1080217769 5862.5512 3,934.73 351276 1080217770 5862.5512 49.15 351278 1080217771 5862.5515 3,396.75 351277 1080217772 5862.5513 645.75 351279 1080217773 5862.5513 1,169.01 351274 1080217834 5822.5512 273.31 351272 1080217837 5842.5512 7,724.16 351271 1080217838 5842.5512 1,240.65 350837 1080217839 5842.5513 i 19, 955.82 386328 8/28/2014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 166.20 351282 1090273329 5430.5514 382.40 351281 1090273504 5421.5514 155.00 351280 1090273505 5421.5514 2,208.50 350838 1090273919 5862.5514 BARNYARD BOOGIE COST OF GOODS SOLD MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page- 40 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS ASSESSING ASSESSING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/22/2014 -- 8/28/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386328 8/28/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 2,839.35 350839 1090274793 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 246.00 350841 1090274794 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 43.00 1350840 1090274795 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5,740.32 351283 1090277271 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 115.50 351284 1090277272 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 11,896.27 - 386329 8/28/2014 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 246.58 MINI GOLF BALLS 00002093 351159 318419 5761.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 246.58 386330 8/28/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 52.69 51- 5276505 -8 350814 423526856 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 98.23 51- 0010025256 -3 350794 423612457 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 150.92 386331 8/28/2014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 253.00 351285 13216 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 253.00 386332 812812014 101091 ZIEGLER INC 251.17 GENERATOR REPAIR 351074 SW050222776 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 297.35 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 351075 SW140140165 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 548.52 1,355,786.96 Grand Total Pa e t 1— t T I ym n ns umen ota s Checks 615,167.09 A/P ACH Payment 740,619.87 Total Payments 1,355,786.96 8/26/2014 10:55:15 Page - 41 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL YORK SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/22/2014 - 8/28/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 278,666.02 ,. 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 7,986.05 02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 3,006.44 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 80,919.11 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 219.45 04006, WORKING CAPITAL FUND 257,291.11 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 19,150.67 05100 ART CENTER FUND 12,146.79 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 206.74 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 4,667.74 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 20,588.74 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 10,374.42 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 6,003.98 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,226.72 05800 LIQUOR FUND 181,636.89 05900 UTILITY FUND 379,060.24 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 85,565.95 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,067.90 i Report Totals 1,355,786.96 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and 8/26/2014 10:55:23 Page - 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account * Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2014/06/30 $50.14 Food JASONS DELI EDINA EDINA MN 1170.6106 * *6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2014/07/03 $42.00 Food JASONS DELI EDINA EDINA MN 1170.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/06/30 $35..23 EATING /DRINKING EDINA GRILL. EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/01 $18.48 EATING /DRINKING MILL VALLEY KITCHEN SAINT LOUIS f MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/11 $56.81 EATING /DRINKING GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/15 $94.52 Data plan SPRINT *WIRELESS 800 - 639 -6111 -KS 1120.6188 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/14 $31.75 EATING /DRINKING EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/16 $39.65 EATING /DRINKING RICE PAPER ASIAN FUSION EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/22 $1,060.00 OFFICE SERVICES ICMA INTERNET 800 - 745 -8780 DC 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/22 $50.11 EATING /DRINKING GOOD EARTH.1 EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *0168 SCOTT NEAL 2014/07/22 $380.70 AIRLINE USAIRWAYS 037742332481 CHICAGO IL 1120.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC2014 /06/25 ($12.62) Food BYERLY`S SSS ST LOUIS PAR MN 1100.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC2014/06/28 $38.97 Cleaning WALDORF NEVENS CLEAN EDINA MN 1120.6406 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC2014/06/27 $40.00 Software VOLGISTICS INC 616 -456 -5388 MI 1120.6105 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC2014/06/30 $69.73 Food, PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/01 $230.69 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/08 $127.66 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1600.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/09 $193.69 Food PINSTRIPES , EDINA MN 1120.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/.11 $34.42 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1120.6406 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/15 $176.41 Food- PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/21 $20.00 Recording fee MN D.VS.SOUTHDALE 152 6, EDINA MN 1120.6406 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014 /07/21 $0.49 Recording fee MN DVS SOUTHDALE15269: KNOXVILLE TN 1120.6406 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC2014 /07/22 $62.50 Stamp NOTARY ROTARY, INC 515 - 309 -1351 IA 1120.6406 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/22 $2.37 Software VOLGISTICS INC 616= 456 -5388 MI 1120.6105 * *2129 HEATHER BRANIC 2014/07/22 $25.00 Registration EDINA CHAMBER OF COMN 952- 8069060 MN 1120.6104 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/06/27= $505.00 CAFR review GOVERNMENT FINANCE 01312- 977 -9700 IL 1160.6103 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/07/03 $18.25 Transaction fee PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -9770 TX 1160.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/07/03 $59.95 Transaction fee -UB PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888- 883 -9770 TX 5902.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/07/03 $19.95 Transaction fee -UB PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888 - 883 -9770 TX 5902.6.155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/07/03 $19.95 Transaction fee PAYFLOW /PAYPAL 888- 883 -9770 TX 1160.6155 * *0176 JOHN WALLIN 2014/07/09 $225.00 PAFR review GOVERNMENT FINANCE 01312 -977 -9700 IL 1160.6103 * *7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2014/07/18 $235.95 Training MNSOCIETYOFCPAS 952 - 831 -2707 MN 1160.6104 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2014/07/07 $6.87 Food TARGET 00013524 CHASKA MN 1185.6406 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2014/07/09 $13.15 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1185.6406 GAPurchasing cards \2014 purchasing card electronic files \2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/25/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT-CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name -City State Account * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2014/07/10 $15.25 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1`185.6406 * *0143 DEB MANGEN 2014/07/24 $13.27 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1185.6406 * "0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/06/261; $31.25 Planner refill FRANKLINCOVEYPRODUCl800 =819 -1812 UT 1190.6406 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/06/30. $500.00 IAAO Conference INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIAI 816- 70:18100 MO 1190.6104 * *01.84 ROBERT WILSON 2014/07/10 $17.00 Food WORLD STREET KITCHEN MINNEAPOLIS MN 1190:6106 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON. 2014/07/09 $10.50 Parking GOVT MPLSPARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN . 1190.6106 * *01'84 ROBERT.WILSON 2014/07/10 $39.79 Food THE LOCAL MINNEAPOLIS MN 1190.6106 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/07/10 $7.75 Parking GOVT MPLSPARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN 1190.6106 * *0184 ROBERT WILSON 2014/07121 $501.80 Subscription D J *WALL ST.JOURNAL 800- 568 -7625 MA 1190.6105 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2014/07/10 $1,915.13 Centennial Fountain EAGLE FOUNTAIN -WORKS 800 -351 -8814 FL 5761.6406 * *2522 BRIAN OLSON 2014/07/11 $772.78 APWA conference UNITED 0162414730665. 800- 932 -2732 TX 1281.6104 * *9180- MILLNER CHAD - 2014/07/03 $265.00 Roadway permits HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC WC 612-5960236 MN 07118.1705.20 * *9180 _ MILLNER CHAD 2014/07/03 $265.00 Roadway permits HENNEPIN.CTY PUBLIC WC612- 5960236 - MN 01423.1705.20 * *9180 MILLNER CHAD 2014/07/03 $265.00 Roadway permits HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC WC612- 5960236 MN 44012.1705.20 * *4882 ANDERSON SHAW 2014/07/10 $207.15 Food PAPA JOHN'S 01256 952- 930 -3569 MN 1647.6103 * *6999. DAN MCMAHON 2014/07/14 ($299.93) Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN 1301.6556 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/26 $423.25 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5921.6530 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/06/27 $2,149.99 Pump NOR "NORTHERN TOOL 800 - 222 -5381 MN 5933.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/07 $18.33 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA 9529229734 MN 5933.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/08 $20.95 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA 9529229734 MN 5933.6406 *_ *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/09. $15.77 Service WALLY'S SERVICE-STA.., MINNEAPOLIS MN 5933.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/11 $16.14 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA MINNEAPOLIS MN 5933.6406 * *7756 _ GARY WELLS 2014/07/14 $295.98 Tools SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5920.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/15 $31.32 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA 9529229734 MN 6933.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/17 $63.04 Service . WALLY'S SERVICE STA MINNEAPOLIS MN 5933.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/18 $45.00 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA MINNEAPOLIS MN 5933.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/21 $235.00 Membership MINNESOTA RURAL WATEf 866 - 9177368 MN 5913.6105 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/22 $241.00 LED light NORTHERN�TOOL EQUIPMI BURNSVILLE MN 5920.6406 * *7756 GARY WELLS 2014/07/22 $101.76. Parts NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMI BURNSVILLE MN1 5933:6530 *'6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/07/01 $41.43 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA MINNEAPOLIS MN 5934.6406 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/07/18 ($99.99) Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN 5915.6406 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/07/18 ($63.42) Disputed transaction JOURNEYS.COM 615- 367 -8374 TN .,:5915.6406 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/07/18 ($225.00) Disputed transaction STONES THROW RECORD! 323-259-8200 CA 5915.6406 * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014/07/21 $63.27 Service WALLY'S SERVICE STA 9529229734 MN 5934.6406 G: \Pur!. Jing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USE3 hasing Card Register.xlsx > 2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description * *6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2014107122 $215.00 Permits * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/06/26 $152.06 Food * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/06/26 $23.59 Propane * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/06/30 ($96.54) Return hard drive * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/07/02 $126.58 Fingerprint- sensor * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/07/06 $119.08 Parking * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/07/09 $109.90 Permits * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/07/17 $855.21 LED bracelet * *2929 DAVID NELSON 2014/07/17 $175.00 Certification * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/26 $91.61 Hotel * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/26 $154.52 Hotel * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/26 $154.52 Hotel * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/26 $150.00 Membership * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/06/26 $250.00 Training * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/07/02 $19.74 Motorcycle fuel * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/07/08 $68.15 Wiper * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/07/08 $125.00 Training * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/07/09 $17.51 Motorcycle fuel * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/07/22 $130.00 Training * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2014/07/22 $186.99 Cabinet * *4334 RYAN SCHULTZ. 2014/07/23 $44.98 Belt case * *8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2014/07/10 $231.45 Trading cards * *8499 CRAIG ESSIG 2014/06/30 $22.91 Textbooks * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/06/26 $20.00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/07/12 $40.00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD .2014/07/16 $144.54 Repair part * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/07/20 $20:00 Data plan * *0927 DARRELL TODD 2014/07/24 $20.00 Data plan * *8102 JEFF BROWN 2014/07/11 $95.00 NEHA Membership * *8102 JEFF BROWN 2014/07/11 $95.00 NEHA Membership * *8102 JEFF BROWN 2014/07/18 $484.00 REHS study guide * *2512 DAVID FISHER 2014/06/25 $148.32 Office supplies * *2512 DAVID FISHER 2014/06/27. $333.00 Mech code books * *2512 DAVID FISHER 2014/06/27 $65.00 IMPC code books Merchant Name City State HENNEPIN CTY PUBLIC WC 612-5960236 MN DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN MICRO CENTER #045 RETA ST LOUIS PAR MN FULCRUM BIOMETRICS LL( 210-3483687 TX PARK,N FLY ONLINE - RESV404- 264 -1000 GA MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF PC 651-4570677 MN 41MPRINT 877- 4467746 WI PAYPAL *IAPE 402 - 935 -7733 CA HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS BAXTER MN THE LODGE AT BRAINERD BAXTER MN THE LODGE AT BRAINERD BAXTER MN NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFIC 800 - 279 -9127 PA ACT *ATOM 877 - 551 -5560 CA SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA' MN FASTENAL COMPANY01 HOPKINS MN ACT *ATOM 877- 551 -5560 CA HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0217 EDINA MN BCA TRAINING EDUCATI01\651- 7931100 MN OFFICE MAX ST. LOUIS PAF MN CHINOOK MEDICAL GEAR 1970-3751241 CO SQ *CHOICE MARKETING, I ASTON PA AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BI WA VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA' 888 - 294 -6804 CA VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPX 888 - 294 -6804 CA WARNERS' STELLIAN HQ 651- 222 -0011 MN VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPX 888 - 294 -6804 CA NEHA 303- 756 -9090 CO NEHA 303 - 756 -9090 CO NEHA 303 - 756 -9090 CO BMK SOLUTIONS CORP 952 - 7463195 MN INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888 - 422 -7233 IL INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888 -422 -7233 IL GAPurchasing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx Account 5913.6260 1400.6406 1400.6406 1400.6160 1400.6160, 1400.6103 1400:6405 1400.6406 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 1400.6107 1400.6406 1400.6104 1400.6107 1400.6104 1400.6406 1400.6610 1470.6406 1470.6104 1470.6188 1470.6188 1470.6530 1470.6188 1470.6188 1490.6105 1490.6105 1490.6104 1495:6406 1495.6405 1495.6405 8/25/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State . Account * *2512 DAVID FISHER 2014/07/24 $28.94 Paper G .'S. DIRECT, INC. 952- 942 -6115 MN 1495.6406 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/27 $191.99 Mirror TRUCKCHAMP.COM 574 - 2621129 IN 1553:6530 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA. X2014 106/26 $299.94 Trailer NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP -M WOODBURY MN 1553.6585 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/27 $11.52 Shipping UPS *1Z19T47B0395023810 800 - 811 =1648 GA 1553.6406 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/06/27 $86.51 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1553.6585 _ * *1996 GUNNAR.KAASA 2014/07/08 ($25.16) Tax refund ROSEDALE CHEVROLET ROSEVILLE MN 1553.6530 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/07/08 $372.14 Ladder rack AMERICAN VAN 732 - 9055900 NJ 1553.6585 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/07/08 $3,195.00 Tracks PROWLER 877- 4776953 IN 1553.6585 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/07/08 $499.00 Tracks PROWLER TRACKS 877 - 4776953 IN 1553.6585 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/07/08 $167.65 Parts CERTIFJT AUTO PARTS -MN 651- 765 -4200 MN 1553.6530 * *1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2014/07/15 -$107.27 Car wash MISTER CAR WASH #601. EDINA MN 1553.6238 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/25 $187.50 Phone charger AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BI WA 1400.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/26 $71.94 HDMI cable AMAZON MKTPL.ACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BI WA 1400.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/06/28 $53.58 Software. APL *APPLE ITUNES STORE 866- 712 -7753 CA 1554.6160 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/01 $121.86 Extension cable M RUGGED MOBILE TECHN 847 - 870 -3805 IL 1400.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014 /07/03 $32.13 Software APL* ITUNES:COM /BILL 866- 712 =7753 CA 1554.6160 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/05 $1.19.00 Case for Kcaron CLAMCASE, LLC 800- 939 -0335 CA 1554:6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/06 $20.00 iPad data - Gilgenbach VZWRLSS"PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014 /07/09, $11.26 PPT remote for FS1 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BI WA 1470.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING- 2014/07/11 $26.96 iPad anti -glare AMAZON.COM AMZN:COM /BI WA 1495.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/14 $21.85 IT supplies AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 1554.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/16 $240.48 Scanner AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI.WA 5902:6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/19 $54.68 Apps for Inspections APL* ITUNES.COM /BILL 866 - 712 -7753 CA 1554.6160 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/22 $9.62 Apps for Ins_ pections APL* ITUNES.COM /BILL 866 - 712 -7753 CA 1554.6160 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014 /07/24 $39.99 .IT supplies AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 1554.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014/07/24 $20.48 IT supplies AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BI WA 1554.6406 * *8753 RYAN BROWNING 2014 /07/24 $207.80 Screwdriver /drill AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN COM /BI WA ,1554.6406 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/06/27 $178.60 Inventory TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5720.551 * *5587 DAWN.BEITEL 2014/06/27 $23.97 Inventory TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5310.6513 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/07/03. $98.08 Inventory TARGET 00000059 BLOOMINGTO MN 5310.5510 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/07/03 $17.08 Inventory TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5310.5510 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/07/18 $97.90 Inventory TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5720.5510 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/07/18 $10.39 Inventory TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5310.5510 * *5587 DAWN BEITEL 2014/07/21 $64.34 Food DQ GRILL &CHILL #41184 EDINA . MN 5310.6406 G: \Pur Ang cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB ,hasing Card Register.xlsx 1 2014 Account Name Date * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/06/27 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/07/01 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/07/03 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/07/03 * *6841 ANN KATTREH 2014/07/22 * *7279 DONNA TILSNER 2014/07/20 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014 /06/25 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /06/25 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/06/25 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /06/26 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/03 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /07/07 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/07 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014107/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/08 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/16 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF2014 /07/16 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/22 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14= 07/26/14 Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account $198.55 OTHER GOPHER SPORT, 507 -444 -1522 MN 1600.6406 $238.92 OTHER GOPHER SPORT 507- 444 -1522 MN 1600.6406 ($182.25) OTHER GOPHER SPORT - OWATONNA MN 1600.6406 $415.07 Fireworks display ULTIMATE EVENTS INC PLYMOUTH MN 1627.6103 $20.00. Data plan = Kattreh VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPK 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1600.6188 $14.79 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 1628.6406 $214.55 4th of July Flag CVSFLAGS COM _ _ 765 -662 -0037 IN 1627.6103 $492.00 Trip fees AIRMAXX TRAMPOLINE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1600.6103 $100.00 Membership UST *USIA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $127.66 Supplies WM SUPERCENTER #1855 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1621.6406 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST"USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 .Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105. $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $20.00 Registration UST *USTA MEMBERSHIP 800 - 9908782 NY 1623.6105 $120.00 Tennis program ACT *USTA TEAMTNS 877 - 243 -8107 CA 1623.6105 $120.00 Tennis program SQ *USTA NORTHERN MINNEAPOLIS MN 1623.6105 $90.00 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651 - 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $51.50 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651 - 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $90.00 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651 - 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $191.50 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651 - 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $141.50 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651 - 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $51.50 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651- 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $51.50 Portables JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651 - 2775912 MN 1621.6406 $176.92 Supplies SPORTS AUTHOR100007047 RICHFIELD MN 1623.6406 $182.28 Supplies SPORTS AUTHOR10000707C MAPLE GROVI MN 1623.6406 $99.00 Program fees CTY OF EAGAN- CASCADE I EAGAN MN 1624.6406 G: \Purchasing cards \2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/25/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account . Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF 2014/07/22 $64.56 Office supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BI WA 1624:6406 * *7130 ERIC BOETTCHEF.2014 /07/23 $210.78 Program supplies ORIENTAL TRADING CO 800 - 228-0475 NE 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /06/25 $822.00 Recycling receptacle UPBEAT 866 - 8328957 -MO 47080.6710 * *6032 KRISTIN. AARSV012014 /06/27 $62.06 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1629.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /06/27 $21.77 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /06/30 $6.42 Cups JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /06/30 $10.72 Sunshade JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/01 $19.29 Supplies OFFICE MAX ST. LOUIS PAF MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/07 $62.84 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/08 $112.00 Program fees SHADY OAK BEACH MINNETONKA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVO12014 /07/10 $44.02 Supplies TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAF MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVOI2014 /07/09 $734.70 .Rental equipment BROADWAY RENTAL 763 - 5331680 MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/09 $25.95 Chalk S &S WORLDWIDE 800- 9373482 CT 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/10 $540.00' Field trip tickets SEALIFE MINNESOTA BLOOMINGTO MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/13 $9;10 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014/07/16 $2.40 WHOLESALE TRADE TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1624.6406 **6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/20 $1.89 EATING /DRINKING YOGURT LAB CALHOUN MINN EAPOLIS:MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSV012014 /07/20 $4.50 EATING /DRINKING BEN AND JERRY'S EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *6032 KRISTIN AARSVO12014 /07/20 $19.98 Food JERRY'S FOODS;OF'ED EDINA MN 1624.6406 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD. 2014/06/27 $96.98 Charger CPO COMMERCE- 800 -714 -0918 CA 1646.6610 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD._ 2014/07/03 $11.00 Car wash MISTER CAR WASH #601 EDINA MN 1646.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/07/02 $99.00 Membership MN NURSERY: LANDSCAPE 555_ 5555555 MN 1643.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/07/04 $204.99 LED light CPO COMMERCE 800 - 714 -0918 CA 1646.6610 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/07/09 $129.90 Training book INTL SOC ARBORICULTURE 217- 355 -9411 IL 1644.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD -2014/07/16 $240.00 Training ACT *UNIVERSITY OF MINN 877 =551= 5560 CA 1646.6103 * *0756 BOB.PRESTRUD 2014/07/17 $120.00. Training ACT *UNIVERSITY OF MINN 877 - 551 -5560 CA 1646.6103 * *0756 BOB-PRESTRUD 2014/07/17 $600.00 Training ACT *UNIVERSITY OF MINN 87;7= 551 -5560 CA -1646.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/07/22 $15.01 Car wash MISTER CAR WASH #601 EDINA MN 1646.6103 * *0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2014/07/21 $134.18 Food SAVOY PIZZA - EDINA MINNEAPOLIS MN 1644.6103 * *2293. JENNIFER BENNE 2014/06/26 $12.99 Software SALES@AIRSQUIRRELS.CC AIR SQUIRREL OH 1130.6410 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/01. $50.00 Advertising FACEBK *5FZN56A532 WWW.FB.MEh CA 2611.6122 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/01 $11.96 Newspaper . THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCU 612- 6734343 MN 1130.6105 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/03 $5.92 Water JERRY'S FOODS OF ED - EDINA MN 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/03 $339.00 Parade banner BANNER CREATIONS INC 612 - 8711015 MN 1130.6406 G: \Pur ,ing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB _.hasing Card Register.xlsx '2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER ,6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City State Account * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/11 $15.00 Parade banner BANNER. CREATIONS INC 612- 8711015 MN 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/03 $10.72 Photoshop software ADOBE SYSTEMS, .INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406: * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/05 $53.63 Creative cloud - Denfel,ADOBE,SYSTEMS, INC. 800- 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014 /07/04 $50.00 Mobile app ads FACEBK *B3XF26A632 WWW.FB.ME /, CA 1130.6122 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/05 $20.00 Data plan - Martin VZWRLSS" PRPAY AUTOPX888- 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/05 $20.00 BUSINESS EXPENS VZWRLSS"PRPAY AUTOP,A' 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/06 $53.63 Creative cloud - Denfel-ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/08 $26.81 Teleprompt app APL* ITUNES.COM /BILL 866 - 712 -7753 CA 1130.6410 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/12 $32.17 Creative cloud - Bisek ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800 - 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/11 $20.00 Data plan - Denfeld VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1130.6160 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/14 $32.17 Creative cloud - Bisek ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800- 833 -6687 WA 1130.6406 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/16 $39.66 App installs FACEBOOK JEZ766W532 WWW.FB.MEh CA 1130.6122 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/16 $10.39 Music in the park ad FACEBOOK JEZ766W532 WWW.FB.MEh CA 2611.6102 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/18 $29.95 Invoicing software 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS, 416 -481 -6946 ON 1130.6103 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/18 $5.00 Spam blocker AKSMT.COM 877 - 273 -3049 CA 1130.6124 * *2293 JENNIFER BENNE 2014/07/22 $20.00 Data plan - Swenson VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPX 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1100.6160 * *8318 TOM SWENSON 2014107124 $165.00 Workshop ACT *UNIVERSITY OF MINN 877 - 551 -5560 CA 5410.6104 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRI D 2014/06/26 $43.84 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 5420.5510 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/28 $69.85 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5410.6513 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/28 $20.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA' 888 - 294 -6804 CA 5440.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/27 $227.35 Golf supplies THE GLOW STORE VICTORIA BC 5424.6406 * *8806' MARY WOOLDRID 2014/06/30 $48.22 Food DQ GRILL &CHILL #41184 EDINA MN 5410.6104 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/08 $57.65 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5410.6513 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/09 $17.15 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5410.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/18 $115.73 Food DQ GRILL &CHILL #41184. EDINA MN 5410.6104 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/18 $19.29 Food DQ GRILL &CHILL #41184 EDINA MN 5410.6104 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/18 $30.42 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5410.6513 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/22 $26.81 Office supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5410.6513 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID2014 /07/23 $21.43 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 5423.6406 * *8806 MARY WOOLDRID 2014/07/22 $25.74 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5410:6513 * *4673 SUSIE MILLER 2014/07/18 $317.84 Stainless table US FOODS CULINARY E AN 763- 2681279 MN 5520.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/26 $70.60 Building supplies GLASS AND MIRROR OUTLI HOPKINS MN 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/07/01 $90.60 Building supplies HIRSHFIELDS /SOUTH DALE EDINA MN 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/06/30 $101.67 Gallery supplies 40VER4.COM 718 - 9322700 NY 5120.6406 GAPurchasing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/25/2014 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER _ 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name City . State Account * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/07/15 $137.28 Building supplies HIRSHFIELDS /SOUTHDALE EDINA MN 5111.6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/07/17 $56.58 Building supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAR. EDINA MN 5119:6406 * *3792 MICHAEL FREY 2014/07/16 $138.63 Craft supplies BLICK ART 800 -447 -1892 EDINA MN 5110.6564 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/27 $40.50 .Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5420.5514 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/06/27 $342.60 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/03 $14.00 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA. MN 5420.5514 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/03 $156.75 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5420.5513. * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/03 $270.00 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07108 $214.77 Vac repair JOHNSTONS SALES AND SI RICHFIELD MN 5420.6530 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/11 $4.65 Inventory LUNDS #3 RICHFIELD MN 5421.5510 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/09 $103.73 Shutter - handles LITTLE BLIND SPOT HOPKINS MN 5424.6406 * *5821. AMY SMITH 2014/07/15 $84.80 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5420.5514 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/15 $208.00 Inventory EDINA - LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5420.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/15 $180.00 ,Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/15 $31.11 Adapter APPLE STORE #R054 EDINA MN 5420.6406 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/17 $49.10 Stamps USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5410.6235 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/18 $395.00 Survey NATIONAL GOLF 561- 7446006 FL 5410.6122 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/23 $226.50 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK :EDINA MN 5420.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/23 $762.00 Inventory EDINA LIQUOR YORK EDINA MN 5421.5513 * *5821 AMY SMITH 2014/07/24 $30.30 Inventory LUNDS #3 RICHFIELD MN 5421.5510 * *9665 SUSAN FAUS 2014/07/02 $30.00 Data plan VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPA 888 - 294 -6804 CA 1600.6188 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014 /07103 $25.75 Meter rental PITNEY BOWES* 800- 228 -1071 CT 5710.6235 * *1282 PATRICIA MCGRA 2014/07/08 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800- 468 =8454 CT 5710.6235 * *0116 TOM_ SHIRLEY 2014/06/26 $155.33 Pesticide PEST MANAGEMENT:SUPP 800- 242 -1211 IL 5761.6540 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07101' $120.00 Workshop ACT *UNIVERSITY OF MINN 877- 551 -5560 CA 5760.6104 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/01 $389.43 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/02 $43.96 Cups AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BI WA 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/03 _ $416.16 Pump BLUE THUMB DISTRIBUTIN1 989 - 921 -3474 MI 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/13 $46.66 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5761.662 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/16 $159.96 Flowers BACHMAN'S INC #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5765.6620 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/18 $165.94 Glass BESSER GLASS AND MIRR(BLOOMINGTO MN 5761.6180 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/18 $62.48 Supplies MENARDS 3021 BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/18 $64.92 Signs DIRT CHEAP SIGNS 512 - 2677446 , TX '5761.6406 * *0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2014/07/22 $81.79 Supplies MENARDS 3297 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 - GAPur.. ,ing cards\2014 purchasing card. electronic files\2014 US2 ,chasing Card Register.xlsx '2014 CITY OF EDINA. CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/27/14- 07/26/14 Account Name Date Amount Description Merchant Name . City State Account * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /07/08 $16.06 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5820.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSA12014 /07/08 $16.06 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSAI2014 /07/08 $16.05 Office supplies OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5860.6513 * *0093 STEVEN GRAUSA12014 /07/11 $21.44 Mouse OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 5840.6513 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/06/25 $16.27 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 7411.6406 * *2223 GREG BRETSON 2014/07/09 $5.59 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST HAIR EDINA MN 7411.6406 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/06/26 $48.41 Food VON HANSONS MEATS & M RICHFIELD MN 7414.6106 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/07/01 $30.00 Email service EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARKET 800 - 5954401 TN 7410.6122 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/07/04 $23.02 Advertising GOOGLE *ADWS510766887, CC @GOGGLE CA 7410.6122 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/07/17 $18.97 Food CUB FOODS #3124 MINNEAPOLIS MN 7414.6106 * *9956 DEB FIELDS 2014/07/24 $19.30 Coffee TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/06/27 $8.05 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/07/14 $14.69 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/07/14 $6.31 Paint THE HOME DEPOT #2845 RICHFIELD MN 7411.6406 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014/07/16 $6.31 Paint THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 * *0025 GERALD KOPLOS 2014107/17 $45.91 Supplies MENARDS 3268 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 $38,950.08 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing popcies,ano GAPurchasing cards\2014 purchasing card electronic files\2014, USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 8/25/2014 l O e]/ V/ 0 v .� • lc con POxATSO • less To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. C. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Set Date For Canvass Of Municipal Election For November 7, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. Action Requested:. -Set a special meeting date of Friday, November 7, 2014 at 5 :00 p.m. to canvass the results of the November :4, 2014 Municipal Election. Information / Background: M.S. 205.185, Subd. 3 requires that between the third and tenth day after an election, the governing body of a city shall canvass the returns and declare the results of the election. Staff recommends the Council set the canvass date for Friday, November 7, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. as the date for this meeting. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and City Council Ow e Agenda Item #: N.D. The Recommended Bid is From: Patty McGrath, General Manager Edinborough Park/Aquatic Center ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: September 2, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — Replace Triple Wave Slide at Adventure Peak Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 21, 2014 Company: On Call Services Recommended Quote or Bid: On Call Services Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $26,300 General Information: This purchase is for the replacement of the triple wave slide at Adventure Peak. This project is an approved CIP project for 2014. The replacement includes removal of existing structure and installation of new framing, mounts, and three compartment fiberglass open slide. For safety, it also includes side curtain containment, a landing pad and a new entrance panel which provides a safety feature. that the current slide does not have. This is one of the most popular events in Adventure Peak because multiple children /adults -can ride at the same time. The triple wave slide is an original feature'to the play structure and is 12 years old. The useful life on most amenities is 10 years, so it has exceeded its life expectancy. Due to its ongoing popularity, the fiberglass on the slide is badly worn in several areas and despite numerous repairs; it is becoming much more difficult to maintain. Last year, Adventure Peak had more than 125,000 paid admissions for children. This does not include adult visitors, as they are free with a paid admission. This triple wave slide is an outstanding feature that easily accommodates the extremely high volume of visitors and provides a thrilling ride for guests of all ages. Due to the highly specialized nature of this construction, there is only one provider to do this type of work and ensure it is compliant with all safety and liability requirements. On Call Services provided a team for the initial installation of Adventure Peak in 2002. The city has maintained a preventative maintenance and service agreement with On Call Services for the past 12 years. On Call Services has completed all major repairs, upgrades and new installations for the play structure. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Attachment: ' On Call Services Proposal for triple wave slide City of Edina ., 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 QR Commercial Construction 1 -800 -549 -5837 Project Management St. Cloud Area (320) 250 -4997 Building Services Fax (763) 856 -0948 27928 145th St. Zimmerman, IVIN 55398 NAME /ADDRESS CITY OF EDINA Edinborough Park. Ship To Adventure peak ESTIMATE DATE ESTIMATE NO. 7/20/2014 401 SIGNATURE P.O. NO. TERMS PROJECT Due on receipt DESCRIPTION QTY TOTAL Indoor Play Construction 26 ;300.00 Remove existing 3 comp fiberglass slide. Install framing and mounts to accommodate new slide. Frame and install entry panel. Colors to be determined See Attachments) Notes: All materials and labor to be ASTM,ADA, and CPSC compliant. Estimated completion time 5 -7 business days. Sectional closing of this area required. CONTACT OCS ASAP UPON APPROVALFOR SCHEDULING TOTAL 0 ®�ML $26,300.00 SIGNATURE R Commercial Construction i -aGb -6.49 -5837 Project Management St. Cloud Area (320) 250 -4997 Building Services Fax (763) 856 -0948 27928 145th St. Zimmerman, MN 55395 NAME /ADDRESS CITY OF EDINA Edinborough Park Ship To Adventure peak ESTIMATE DATE ESTIMATE NO. 7/20/2014 401 SIGNATURE P.O. NO. TERMS PROJECT Due on receipt DESCRIPTION QTY TOTAL Indoor Play Construction 26;300.00 Remove existing 3 comp fiberglass slide. Install franung and mounts to accommodate new slide. Frame and install entry panel. Colors to be determined. See Attachments) Notes: All materials and labor to be ASTM,ADA, and CPSC compliant. Estimated completion time 5 -7 business days. Sectional closing of this area required. CONTACT OCS ASAP UPON APPROVALFOR SCHEDULING TOTAL $26,300.00 SIGNATURE ? �� � � r� � � « y, . 2� ��� «��: «< « � � � y: : � � \ :� - � � 2� � � � � � y ,§.»2 .� y�� y� �� y� � : . : , »� � � \«<� \ 7� �� � � � ° �� � �«,� � ..�� »2� \�� \? m� «?� l� y? d; ^ ©� � 11� O e in ��� �' y0 CORPOIiA� lass To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: IV.E. The Recommended Bid is From: Patty McGrath, General Manager Edinborough Park/Aquatic Center ❑x Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: September 2, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — Renovation of Lower Level of Adventure Peak Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: August 21, 2014 NA Company: On Call Services Recommended Quote or Bid: On Call Services General Information: Amount of Quote or Bid: $18,800 This purchase is for the lower level renovation of Adventure Peak. This project is an approved CIP project for 2014. The renovation includes removal of outdated and worn equipment, installation of three unique types of active /physical events and the protective netting and foam that ensures the safety of those events. Events include two (2) Pogo Hoppers, two (2) Sit/Stand and Spins and two (2) Skywheels, as well as reinforcement of the main entry Moonwalk. These events are in a very high traffic area and provide activities that we do not have in other areas of Adventure Peak. Last year, Adventure Peak had more than 125,000 paid admissions for children who visited. This does not include adult visitors, as they are free with a paid admission. This renovation will appeal to several age groups and draw new visitors and repeat visitors to the park. Adventure Peak is 12 years old and the useful life on most amenities is 10 years. Several nearby communities have developed indoor playgrounds that are not as large as Adventure Peak, but they are newer and this renovation will continue to keep Adventure Peak fresh and exciting. Due to the highly specialized nature of this construction, there is only one provider to do this type of work and ensure it is compliant with all safety and liability requirements. On Call Services provided a team for the initial installation of Adventure Peak in 2002. The city has maintained a preventative maintenance and service agreement with On Call Services for the past 12 years. On Call Services has completed all major repairs, upgrades and new installations for the play structure. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Attachment: Lower level renovation proposal City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 Y 1 Commercial Construction Project Management Building Services IWO St. Closed Area (320) 250 -4997 Fay (763) 856 -0945 August 21, 2014 Proposal for events addition to Adventure peak We propose to fiunish labor and materials to complete the following tasks: 1.) Pogo Hoppers: Remove existing foam and related materials to install (2) Pogo Hopper events (see attachment 1). Includes install new framing ,Tuffnet, and foam to match existing decor. 2.) Sit / Stand and Spins: Remove existing crawl tube and related materials to install (2) sit and spin events (see attachment 2). Includes fi•aining, Tuffnet and matching foam. 3.) Sky Wheels: Install fi•aming to accommodate (2) sky wheel events (see attachment 3). Install foam to match existing decor. 4.) Moonwalk Entry Addition: Manufacture and install a 14' subdeck to the main moonwalk entry. Colors to be selected by Owners. Estimated Completion Tune: 1 week. Sectional closing only ,unit may remain open. A 4- 6 week lead time for manufacture and installation is required. Warranty: Parts and Labor for 90 days from completion. New events to be added to the existing All Inclusive Warranty at no charge. Governing Authority: All materials and methods to be ASTM F1918, ADA, and Consumer Product Safety Commission compliant Costs: $18,880.00 ik O A, O TQ, . MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #. IV. F From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works EEO Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorization to Participate in 2015 -2016 Fuel Consortium Action Requested: Authorize staff to participate in the 2015 -2016 State of Minnesota Fuel Consortium. Information / Background: The City of Edina has participated in the State of Minnesota's Fuel Consortium Purchase Program since 2009, see attached fuel purchasing history. The purpose of the Fuel Consortium Purchase Program is to develop a consistent fuel budget for each budget year. The Fixed Price Fuel Program is similar to the road salt purchasing program, where the City must agree to a certain volume of fuel to be purchased. The City needs to submit our requested amount by September 23, 2014; State of Minnesota will then go out for bids before January. The City in the past few years has committed about 70% of our total volume of fuel to be purchased through this program. The other 30% is purchased through the Daily Rack Price for that particular day. Staff does not recommend purchasing 100% of our budgeted fuel, since the consumption of fuel can vary from year to year based on how many miles driven and also how volatile the fuel market has been. There is also a possibility that the Daily Rack Price could go below the Fixed Price making it more advantageous to purchase at a lower cost when possible. Staff has reviewed the information and recommends that City Council authorize Staff to enter a Contract committing to purchase an amount of fuel similar to that of the 2015 - 2016 program. ATTACHMENTS: I • Memo of August 22, 2014 from State of Minnesota Materials Management Division • Past fuel purchasing history City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 DATE: AUGUST 22, 2014 TO: PERSPECTIVE FUEL CONSORTIUM MEMBERS FROM: JACKIE FINGER — STATE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION RE: FIXED PRICE FUEL PROGRAM FOR 2015 -2016 _ (New Contract Term_ February 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016)' The State will again lead the 2015 -2016 Fixed Price Fuel Program for qualified participants. The qualification requirements are as follows: • Participant must be a CPV member and agree to comply with all terms and conditions of the contract. • Participant must be located in the nine county metropolitan area (Anoka, Carver; Dakota, Hennepin, Scott, Sherburne, Ramsey, Wright and Washington) or as amended. •. The tanks must be owned and maintained by the Participant. • Participant must be able to take either gasoline or diesel fuel in the required product type (135, 610, etc.) and as delivered by the Contract Vendor in quantities of at least 500 gallons per delivery. Participant must take 100 percent of the committed monthly amount at the fixed price contracted on its behalf. • Fill rate must be at least 500 gallons or more. Once final Contracts are executed, the participating agency or entity will be notified of the price and the name of the Contract Vendor. CAREFULLY REVIEW THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION!!! Only those agencies that wish to participate in the Fixed Price Program must complete the fuel questionnaire and return it to my attention 'no later than September 23 20141 AT RESPONSES WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. If you are required to obtain approval by your governing board, plan accordingly. Please be careful to provide accurate information. The Spot Price Program does not require firm quantities to be submitted and the Spot Price Program may be used on an as needed basis by any participants in the Fixed Price Fuel Program if they so choose. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via E -mail (PREFERRED): jackie.finger(cDstate.mn.us or by phone at 651.201.2436 or via fax at 651.297.3996. Thank you. RETURN ORDER FORM NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 23, 2014! FUEL CONSORTIUM — OVERVIEW IMPORTANT NOTE TO CURRENT PARTICIPANTS: The current Contract with Mansfield Oil does not expire until January 31, 2015. Due to market conditions AND the solicitation process, the Fuel Core Team is exploring its pricing options for a new program that will begin on February 1, 2015. To achieve this, participants MUST submit their quantities for the Fixed Price Program NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 23, 2014. FIXED, PRICE. PROGRAM —The agencies participating in the Fixed Price Schedule are required to take 100% of its monthly quantity committed and the Contract Vendor is required to provide 100% of the monthly quantities contracted. iThe program will be for 12 months beginning February 1. 2015, through January 31, 2016 If the original purchaser is unable to take all of the monthly committed gallons, the Contract Vendor will be responsible for contacting other locations participating in the Fixed Price Contract to determine if they are able to take additional gallons. If the Contract Vendor is able to ship the unused gallons from the original participating purchaser to another participating agency, there will be no cost to the original participating agency. If the Spot Price is less than the Fixed Price, participants are not required to take more than the monthly amount they committed to. If the Contract Vendor is unable to ship the unused gallons from the original participating purchaser to another participating agency, they may sell the unused gallons on the open market and either debit or credit the difference in price back to the original participating purchaser based on the open market sell price. If the Contract Vendor is unable to provide all of the monthly committed gallons to a participating member by the due date and time, the participating member may purchase the product on the open market and charge the Contract Vendor for any actual additional costs incurred. [SPOT PRICE PROGRA . In addition to a Fixed Price program, we will include a Spot Price program for Participants to handle extra fuel needs over and above the committed quantities in the Fixed Price program. Only Participants in the Fixed Price program may use the Spot Prices offered by the Contract Vendor. Participants are not required to use the Spot Price program and may use other State Spot Price programs currently in place or may purchase their additional fuel needs independently. If the Contract Vendor is unable to provide the order quantity to a State agency or CPV member by the required due date and time, the State agency or CPV member may purchase the product on the open market and charge the Contract Vendor for any actual additional costs incurred. RETURN ORDER FORM NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 23, 2014. CITY OF EDINA FUEL PURCHASING HISTORY June 26, 2012 YEAR FUEL AVERAGE COST PER GALLON DIESEL UNLEADED GAS DIESEL UNLEADED GAS FIXED I RACK FIXED I RACK 2000 54,378 101,164 Data Not Available 2001 58,549 107,836 Data Not Available 2002 56,669 108,305 Data Not Available 2003 59,522 108,310 Data Not Available 2004 57,021 107,847 Data Not Available 2005 61,985 107,641 Data Not Available 2006 55,968 102,392 Data Not Available 2007 65,059 104,461 Data Not Available 2008 62,986 103,905 Data Not Available 2009 61,450 98,007 $ 1.9442 $ 1.9338 $ 1.4500 $ 1.7552 2010 60,760 91,023 $ 2.2916 $ 2.3271 $ 2.0948 $ 2.1365 2011 58,606 97,046 $ 2.7739 $ 3.2227 $ 2.4758 $ 2.8861 2012 59,180 104,011 $ 3.1341 $ 3.2804 $ 2.6940 $ 2.8495 2013 66,036 90,218 $ 3.1936 $ 3.2643 $ 2.7623 $ 2.8307 2014• 46,998 64,732 $ 3.1390 $ 3.2827 $ 2.6445 $ 2.7489 "Notes: Through August 5, 2014 G: \PW\ADMIN \BUDGETS \Purchasing \Fuel \2015 fuel contract\2014 Fuel Purchasing History - Brian.xlsx $119,469.04 $139,237.62 $162,567.18 $185,476.04 $210,892.57 $147,526.72 Deisel $118,831.84 $141,394.60 $188,869.56 $194,134.07 $215,561.31 $154,280.33 - $637.21 $2,156.98 $26,302.37 $8,658.03 $4,668.75 $6,753.61 $142,110.15 $190,674.98 $240,266.49 $280,205.63 $249,209.18 $171,183.77 Unleaded $172,021.89 $194,470.64 $280,084.46 $296,379.34 $255,380.09 $177,941.79 $29,911.74 $3,795.66 $39,817.97 $16,173.71 $6,170.91 $6,758.02 $29,274.53 $5,952.64 $66,120.35 $24,831.74 $10,839.66 $13,511.63 $150,530.55 �91riA, lA O e vt Cn \''. RYOR�'' \C��So 188P To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. G. From: John Wallin, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -88 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis Regarding Utility Services Action Requested: Approve attached resolution approving the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis Information / Background: Minneapolis sells water and sewer services to customers in Edina. The two cities have never entered into a formal joint powers agreement for this purpose. The Edina's City Attorney prepared joint powers agreements with the City of Edina and the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Richfield. The attached joint powers agreement has been reviewed by the City of Edina's attorney and is similar to the City of St. Louis Park and City of Richfield agreements. This agreement would enable The City of Edina to certify delinquent utilities for The City of Minneapolis as Edina currently does for St. Louis Park and Richfield customers which are located in Edina. The City of Edina does not have any customers in Minneapolis. Attachment: • Resolution 2014 -88 Approving the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis • Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Edina and the City of Minneapolis. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-88 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND AND THE CITY OF EDINA TO ESTABLISH THE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE SALE OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES BY THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS WITHIN EDINA A. WHEREAS, Minneapolis sells utility services, such as water and sewer services to customers in Edina WHEREAS, The Cities wish to provide additional remedies for the collection of charges from customers who live in Edina, but receive one or more utility services from Minneapolis. WHEREAS, Minn. Stat 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting Cities or any similar power. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council approves the Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Edina and the City of Minneapolis. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 2nd day of September, 2014. Attest: Debra. A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA. ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City. Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of - , 20 City Clerk JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND THE CITY OF EDINA THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, a Minnesota home rule charter city, and the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota statutory city, herein after collectively referred to as the "Cities ". RECITALS A. Minneapolis sells utility services, such as water or sanitary sewer services, to customers in Edina. B. The Cities wish to provide additional remedies for the collection of charges from customers who live in Edina, but receive one or more utility services from Minneapolis. C. Minnesota Statutes § 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power. NOW, THEREFORE, the Cities agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE. This Agreement shall establish the responsibilities of the Cities concerning assessment against real property in Edina of utility charges incurred by customers receiving Minneapolis utility services at their Edina property who have not paid their applicable Minneapolis utility bill. 2. SALE OF UTILITY SERVICES. Minneapolis will continue to provide the applicable utility service to customers in Edina in accordance with existing practices and agreements, except as modified herein. Usage of Minneapolis utility services by Edina customers shall be subject to the same usage rules imposed upon Minneapolis residents. 3. BILLING. Minneapolis will bill customers in Edina for utility services Minneapolis provides to customers in Edina. The billing rate will be the Minneapolis rate established for outside city customers. If the customer fails to pay a bill, Minneapolis will notify Edina. Upon receipt of such notification, Edina will certify the unpaid bill to taxes in accordance with Minn. Stat. Chapter 444 or other appropriate authority. Edina shall promptly transmit the proceeds to Minneapolis after they are received in the normal course of property tax settlements. 4. WATER METERS. Minneapolis shall provide water meters at its customary charge for customers in Edina using Minneapolis water. Minneapolis shall also be responsible for any necessary testing and replacement of the meters. 5. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 24 months advance written notice to the other party. FOR THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Dated: , 2014 Approved: Department Head responsible for Contract Monitoring for this contract Countersigned: Finance Officer Designee Approved as to Form By: Assistant City Attorney CITY OF EDINA Dated: 92014 By: James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager To: MAYOR & COUNCIL O e tit �O • ,��'ORPORA"tY'� � 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. H. From: John Wallin Action Finance Director Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -89, Authorizing Use Of Facsimile Signatures By Public Officials Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: The Council must adopt a Resolution authorizing the use of facsimile signatures by the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, etc., or other orders by public funds deposited with the City's banks. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -89 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -89 AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: JAMES B. HOVLAND - Mayor ERIC ROGGEMAN - Treasurer SCOTT H. NEAL - City Manager on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant- checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in Bremer Bank, Crown Bank, Eagle Crest Capital Bank, Fidelity Bank, Fifth Third Bank, First Minnesota Bank, BMO Harris Bank N.A., Merrick Bank North American Banking Company, TCF National Bank, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo Bank and Western Bank be and hereby are approved, and that each of said persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. Attest: Dated: September 2, 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: September 2, 2014 Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -90, Authorizing Investment Agreement Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. �s in Nov �y • ,^'Con lip • 1 ,8ge Agenda Item #: IV. I. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The City's Resolution Authorizing Investment Agreement is used by banks and brokerages to open new accounts such as each time a new bond construction fund is opened. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached for your review. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -90 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED, that Scott H. Neal and /or Eric Roggeman who is /are Officer's of the City of Edina, is /are authorized to enter into agreements or commitments to open, maintain and close accounts with banks, brokers and other financial institutions with which it does business, and are authorized to sign on individual bank and broker accounts and such Officers are further authorized to cancel such authority, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Eric Roggeman and /or Kyle Sawyer is /are authorized to purchase or sell any and all securities as authorized by the City of Edina's Investment Policy, and that the Officer is authorized on behalf of the City of Edina to sign any necessary documentation: to give written or oral instructions with respect to said transactions: to obligate the City for the carrying out of any contract, agreement, or transaction; to pay by check or wire; and to take any and all such actions in the name of and on behalf of said City that would be considered desirable and necessary with respect to said transaction; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bank, broker or other financial institution may rely upon the actions of the Officer as the City of Edina representative that any and all securities purchased are legal and authorized investments under the City's applicable policies and /or statutory requirements. The City of Edina represents that it will provide these applicable policies and /or statutory requirements, and that it will notify the bank, broker or other financial institution of any changes made; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the City of Edina is authorized and directed to certify, under the seal of the City of Edina, to you a true copy of these resolutions and specimen signatures of each and every person empowered by these resolutions; and I FURTHER CERTIFY that said resolution shall be effective September 5, 2014 and continue in full force and effect, until revoked or modified by the Edina City Council and written notice is received by the bank, broker or other financial institution, such notice setting forth a resolution adopted to effect said revocation or modification and authorizing the new signatory and /or person authorized to obligate the City of Edina securities transaction. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 2nd day of September, 2014. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk To: Mayor and Council From: Susie Miller, Braemar Arena General Manager Date: September 2, 2014 Ok e • IMconpo PT`9 • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. j. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Security Cameras and Building Card Access, Pro -Tec Design, Braemar Athletic Complex Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 7, 2014 Company: Pro -Tec Design Bid or Expiration Date: September 5, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $48,436.38 Recommended Quote or Bid: Pro -Tec Design Pro -Tec Design is the sole source vendor for card access and security cameras for the City of Edina. General Information: As a part of the Sports Dome and Outdoor Rink Project we are contracting directly with Pro -Tec Design in an effort to eliminate sales tax and guarantee use of our sole source vendor. The project includes installing card access security for the sports dome, four cameras in the dome that are able to be viewed remotely for staff or directly on the TV monitors in the lobby of the sports dome. This will provide an opportunity for parents to view their children's activity from the lobby of the sports dome. Two of the cameras will have remote zoom and pan options. The outdoor rink will have four cameras that will be viewable remotely for arena staff or on monitors in the lobby of the arena. This system will be expanded in the future to include cameras in the arena. Pro -Tec has installed these cameras and /or card access systems at City Hall, Public Works, Aquatic Center, Arneson Acres and several other park shelter buildings. This project is within budget and is included as part of the,Sports Dome, Outdoor Refrigerated Rink and Arena Renovation Project budget. Attachment: Pro -Tec Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 5005 Cheshire Parkway - Suite #3 - - Minneapolis - MN - 55446 Phone: 763 - 553 -1477 - Fax: 763 - 553 -0204 - Email: solutions @pro - tecdesign.com Sold To: City of Edina Nick Lovejoy 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 United States Phone: (612) 203 -0857 Fax: Email: nlovejoy @EdinaMN.Gov Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink Ship To: City of Edina Nick Lovejoy 7501 Ikola Way Edina, MN 55439 United States Phone: (612) 203 -0857 Fax: Email: nlovejoy @EdinaMN.Gov The following proposal outlines the necessary items for the installation of 10 cameras and 2 card readers with 2 electrically locked'only doors at the new Ice Arena and Sports Dome. The devices will be installed as follows..... Accessory Building Security: 2 indoor cameras mounted in the lobby connected to the switch in the electrical room Accessory Building Card Readers: 2 card readers & 2 electrically controlled doors connected to a new panel in the electrical room. Sports Dome Cameras: 4 exterior cameras connected via coax converters to adjustable poles that will be taken down or left up each year. There will be a coax to ethernet converter device mounted on the pole that will remaing fixed. This is to be patched into another length of cable inside the pole that will also be fixed. From there, it will be patched into the removable camera. Ice Arena Cameras: 4 exterior cameras connected via coax converters and mounted in the ceiling. Lastly, an option has been provided to replace /upgrade a fixed camera on a pole at the Sports Dome with a Pan -Tilt -Zoom camera to allow for greater flexibility of viewing depending on the event taking place. j Date Quote Valid For Unit Price Quote # Rep r Terms 08/07/14 30 days PTDQ10770 -02 Tim Ferrian Net 30 days Line Qty Description Unit Price Ext. Price 1 Accessory Building Security (2 indoor cameras) 2 2 MILESTONE XPROTECT ENTERPRISE CAMERA LICENSE $174.62 $349.24 3 2 MILESTONE 1 -YEAR SUPPORT PMA, XPE ENTERPRISE. 1 CAMERA LICENSE $31.59 $63.18 4 2 CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, INDOOR, 3 -9MM $984.51 $1,969.02 VFL, H.264 /MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT -IN MICROPHONE, 720P 5 2 MOUNT, DROP CEILING, SMOKED, FOR P336/8 SERIES $68.00 $136.00 6 2 MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. $44.40 $88.80 7 1 WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) $52.00. $52.00 8 1 SHIPPING $57.78 $57.78 08/07/14 Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink PTDQ10770 -02 Page 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2 CAD DESIGN SERVICE 8 SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 2 PROJECT MANAGER SubTotal 1 1 1 3 2 4 6 1 1,000 25 500 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 4 1 1 52 7 4 4 36 4 37 4 38 4 39 4 40 4 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 4 4 4 4 100 4 4 1 1 8 4 Accessory Building Card Readers (2 card readers & 2 electrically controlled doors) CONTROLLER PACKAGE, 2 READER, 8 INPUT, 4 OUTPUT POWER SUPPLY, 110VAC TO 27VDC, 5.5AMP, 150WATT, FOR 24VDC LOCKS NETWORK INTERFACE 10 /100BASE- TAUTO- SENSING 12VDC BATTERY, 12V 7.2 AH SEALED LEAD ACID FLEXPASS PROX READER, BLACK ARCH MIDRANGE WIEGAND 26 -BIT REX REQUEST TO EXIT DETECTOR, PIR, SOUNDER, LIGHT GRAY DOOR CONTACT, 1" RECESSED WIDE GAP WIRE LEADS GRAY CABLE, CAT 5E PATCH, VIP 1 OFT YELLOW CABLE, PLENUM, ALL -IN -ONE COMPOSITE. CMP 18/4 NS, 22/3P SH, 22/2 -NS, 22/4 NS INS .008 COMPOSITE ACCESS CONTROL 60C. OD= 0.420 ", YELLOW JACKET RoHS 4EPL1S.41.05. SOLD PER FOOT CABLE, PLENUM, 18/2 STRANDED, PLENUM CABLE. WHITE JACKET. PER FOOT MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) SHIPPING SENIOR INSTALLING TECHNICIAN PROJECT MANAGER - LABOR & MATERIAL SCHEDULING & COORDINATION ENGINEERING SERVICES CAD DESIGN SERVICE SubTotal Sports Dome Cameras (4 exterior cameras connected via coax converters) MILESTONE XPROTECT ENTERPRISE CAMERA LICENSE MILESTONE 1 -YEAR SUPPORT PMA, XPE ENTERPRISE, 1 CAMERA LICENSE CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3 -9MM VFL, H.264 /MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT -IN MICROPHONE, 720P T91A67 POLE MOUNT BRACKET PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P33-VE SERIES DOME CAMERA. ETHERNET AND POE OVER COAX, CAMERA UNIT HIGHWIRE WALL OR CAMERA MOUNTING BRACKET ETHERNET AND POE OVER COAX, BASE UNIT CABLE CAT 5E PATCH, VIP 7FT YELLOW CABLE, CAT 5E CMP PLENUM 24AWG 4PR YELLOW POP -BOX, PER FOOT ENCLOSURE, HINGED, BEIGE, 7"W X 8 "H X 3.5'D BW -986 MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) SHIPPING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAD DESIGN SERVICE $86.16 $86.16 $86.16 $86.16 $1,113.75 $116.57 $222.75 $13.50 $211.01 $67.69 $7.76 $4.84 $0.80 $0.11 $25.20 $70.00 $72.22 $86.16 $86.16 $86.16 $86.16 $174.62 $31.59 $1,119.34 $97.56 $48.29 $250.67 $12.70 $250.67 $3.90 $0.23 $24.86 $44.40 $161.00 $182.22 $86.16 $86.16 $172.32 $172.32 $689.2 $172.3k $3,922.26 $1,113.75 $116.57 $222.75 $40.50 $422.02 $270.76 $46.56 $4.84 $800.00 $55.00 $100.80 $70.00 $72.22 $4,480.32 $603.12 $344.64 $344.64 $9,108.49 $698.48 $126.36 $4,477.36 $390.24 $193.16 $1,002.68 $50.80 $1,002.68 $15.60 $23.00 $99.44 $177.60 $161.00 $182.22 $689.28 $344.64 08/07114 Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink PTDQ10770 -02 Page 2 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 60 SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 8 PROJECT MANAGER SubTotal Ice Arena Cameras (4 exterior cameras connected via coax converters) 4 CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3 -9MM VFL, H.264 /MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT -IN MICROPHONE, 720P 4 PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P33 -VE SERIES DOME CAMERA. 1 CEILING BRACKET. 70 CM / 28 INCH. FOR USE WITH AXIS P55- SERIES, AXIS Q60- SERIES PTZ DOME NETWORK CAMERAS, AXIS P33 SERIES PENDANT KIT, AXIS P33 -VE SERIES PENDANT KIT, AXIS 225 PENDANT KIT AND AXIS 216/P3301 PENDANT KIT. WHITE. 4 ETHERNET AND POE OVER COAX, CAMERA UNIT 4 HIGHWIRE WALL OR CAMERA MOUNTING BRACKET 4 ETHERNET AND POE OVER COAX, BASE UNIT 4 CABLE CAT 5E PATCH, VIP 7FT YELLOW 4 ENCLOSURE, HINGED, BEIGE, 7 "W X 8 "H X 3.5 "D BW -98B 4 MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 1 WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 1 SHIPPING 8 ENGINEERING SERVICES 4 CAD DESIGN SERVICE 60 SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 8 PROJECT MANAGER 2 LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY SubTotal -2 77 -2 78 2 79 8 80 1 81 82 Optional Upgrade from fixed camera to PTZ at pole by Sports Dome CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3 -9MM VFL, H.264 /MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT -IN MICROPHONE, 720P PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P33 -VE SERIES DOME CAMERA. CAMERA, NETWORK, PTZ, 30X ZOOM, 720P, MJPEG /H.264, WDR, IMAGE STABILIZATION, INCLUDED OUTDOOR HIGH POE MIDSPAN INJECTOR, INCLUDES HOUSING. MOUNT EXTRA. RATED FOR -40 DEGREES SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III PROJECT MANAGER SubTotal $86.16 $5,169.60 $86.16 $689.28 $15,493.42 $1,119.34 $48.29 $117.27 $250.67 $12.70 $250.67 $3.90 $24.86 $44.40 $161.00 $182.22 $86.16 $86.16 $86.16 $86.16 $200.00 $1,119.34 $48.29 $3,349.71 $86.16 $86.16 Total $4,477.36 $193.16 $117.27 $1,002.68 $50.80 $1,002.68 $15.60 $99.44 $177.60 $161.00 $182.22 $689.28 $344.64 $5,169.60 $689.28 $400.00 $14,772.61 - $2,238.68 - $96.58 $6,699.42 $689.28 $86.16 $5,139.60 $48,436.38 08/07/14 Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink PTDQ10770 -02 Page 3 Statement of Work 1. Pro -Tec Design to provide and install cameras and card readers as listed using pricing from state contract S- 813(5). 2. PTD to coordinate construction activities with all other parties involved. 3. PTD to warranty work for 1 year from substantial completion. Exclusions 1. City of Edina to provide all servers, workstations, and network switches /connectivity needed for surveillance system. 2. Camera poles and footings by others. 3. Cabling for cameras by others. 4. Conduit rough -in for card readers and cameras by others. 5. 110VAC for powering access control panels by others. Thank you again for giving me the opportunity to provide you with this information. If you should need any further clarification or assistance, don't hesitate to contact me! To proceed with the proposal, please sign the Proposal Acceptance portion of the proposal and return to me. Tim Ferrian 5005 Cheshire Parkway North, Suite 3 Minneapolis, MN 55446 Email tferrian @pro - tecdesign.com Office (763) 231 -8617 Cell (763) 370 -7115 Fax (763) 553 -0204 08/07/14 Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink PTDQ10770 -02 Page 4 1. Pricing is based on the work scope and drawings provided to Pro -Tec Design. 2. 110 VAC is PROVIDED by Others unless otherwise specified. 3. Pricing assumes any existing equipment to be re -used is in good operational order. Additional time and material to repair existing equipment is outside this scope of work. 4. Pricing assumes any existing equipment to be re -used is fully compatible with new equipment in this work scope. Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink City of Edina Nick Lovejoy 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 United States City of Edina Printed Name and Title: Signature: PO# / Reference # (optional): Date: Pro -Tec Design, Inc. Printed Name and Title: Tim Ferrian Director of Sales & Marketing Signature: Date: 08/07/14 Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink PTDQ10770 -02 Page 5 Pro-`d'ec Design, inc" Standard Terms and Conditions 1. No liquidated damages will be due. 2. Protection of our work in place is not Pro -Tec Design's responsibility. 3. We will dispose of debris created by our work into Owner - furnished trash bins or container at the site. 4. We do not accept back charges that have not been previously agreed to by us in writing. 5. Late payments will bear interest at the standard prevailing commercial rate. 6. Unless otherwise specified, you will be billed for 30% of the project total immediately after the receipt of an order (ARO). Prompt payment is required to order parts and cover other costs associated with project start-up. 7. We shall then be paid monthly progress payments for agreed upon milestones on or before the 18th day of each month for the value of our work in place plus materials and equipment designed, manufactured, or suitably stored on or off site by us, including any taxes required by law. All invoices shall be paid "Net 30" to ensure uninterrupted performance of work. Final payment is due 30 days following the completion of the project punchlist. 8. No provisions of this Proposal /Contract shall serve to void our rights under Mechanics' Lien Laws. 9. Nothing in this Proposal/Contract shall be construed to require us to continue performance of work if we do not receive timely payment for properly performed work and suitably stored materials. 10. We retain title to all equipment until installation is complete and reserve the right to retake possession of the same or any part thereof at your cost if default is made by you in any payment. 11. You shall furnish and make available to us at the site reasonable storage and parking facilities, and convenient delivery access to our work. 12. You shall provide uncluttered and safe access for us to perform our work. 13. The schedule of any other contractors involved in this project shall be made in consultation with us, and unless otherwise agreed to, shall provide time for us to perform our work on a 8 -hour day, 40 -hour week basis. This Proposal /Contract does not include provision for our being required to perform overtime work for any reasons unless otherwise stated. An additional charge to the contract shall be made for any mutually agreed upon overtime. 14. We are not responsible for delays or defaults that are occasioned by causes of any kind beyond our control, including but not limited to delays or defaults of Architects, the Owner, the Contractor, any Subcontractors, other third parties, civil disorders, labor disputes, and Acts of God. We shall be entitled to equitable adjustment for delays caused by any Architect, Engineer, Contractor, or Owner. 15. If any drawings, illustrations, or descriptive matter are furnished with this Proposal /Contract, they are approximate and submitted only to show the general style, arrangement, and dimensions of equipment offered. Final as -built drawings and specifications will be provided -to the owner at project completion. 16. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES THAT EXTEND BEYOND PRO -TEC DESIGN'S STATED SPECIFICATIONS, AND ALL IMPLIED AND EXPRESS WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXCLUDED. 17. The Owner shall purchase and maintain all -risk builder's risk insurance upon the full value of the entire work including materials delivered to the job site, which shall include the interests of Pro -Tec Design. 18. In case of dispute, the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees. 19. This Proposal /Contract, including the provisions printed above and any specifications or other provisions attached hereto, when accepted by you and Pro -Tec Design shall constitute the Contract between us, and all prior representations or agreements not incorporated herein are superseded. 20. All work to be done during standard business. hours, Monday through Friday unless otherwise noted or at a schedule that Pro -Tec Design believes will provide the most project continuity. 21. Pro -Tec Design will warranty the labor and materials covered under this quotation for one year from the date of substantial completion provided the Owner is current in their payments to Pro -Tec Design, Inc. Accounts that are not current shall not receive warranty work until said accounts are made current. Pro -Tec Design will respond during normal business hours Monday through Friday. Weekends, Holidays and after hours warranty support will be billable at standard overtime rates. Warranty does not include replacement or repair of equipment damaged by; Misuse, Over or Under Voltage, or "Acts of God" such as lightning or other weather related incidents. Warranty only covers the repair or replacement of any parts supplied by Pro-Tee and any labor and travel to and from the site to execute said repairs for one (1) year from the date the Owner has beneficial use of the system. No warranty is extended to not in contract (NIC) equipment. NIC equipment is defined as any equipment not supplied by Pro -Tec or existing equipment that is re -used. The troubleshooting, repair or replacement of NIC equipment will be provided by Pro -Tec at a time and materials basis. 22. Customer agrees that during the term of this contract and for two years following termination, they will not directly or indirectly solicit for hire nor contract for services any employee or contractor who performs services hereunder without Pro-Tee Design's written consent 23. The design and /or intent of the items listed in this system specification is considered intellectual property and owned by Pro -Tec Design and will not be disclosed to any party other than those intended by Pro -Tec Design, except as required by law. Impermissible disclosure of this design /intent will subject the proprietor to Consultant Fees equivalent of the above listed design /build quotation. All materials are guaranteed to be as specified. Any alterations or deviation written or verbal from the above specifications involving extra costs will be executed and will become an extra charge over and beyond the above quotation. 24. This proposal and any documents associated with it supersede any prior verbal or written information provided. 25. Pro -Tec Design is not an insurer of Customer's risks and exposures. Pro -Tec shall not be liable for any failure to perform under this Agreement due to any "Act of God," "Force Majeure," of an other cause beyond Pro-Tee Design's control. Pro -Tec Design shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused in whole or in part from negligence, fault, or wrongful act of Customer or of any third persons or parties. Services provided under this Agreement are for the sole benefit of the Customer and no rights are, or may be, conferred on any other party as a third -party beneficiary, by transfer or assignment, or otherwise. Pro -Tec Design's total liability is limited to the contract price; as matter of law, this limitation does not apply to fraud, willful inury, or willful violiation of the law. 08/07/14 Braemar Sports Dome & Ice Rink PTDQ10770 -02 Page 6 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: September 2, 2014 4,91A1f� w O e • `1 CORYORt`"t�O • less Agenda Item #: IV.K. The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Consulting Services, Park System Master Plan, Confluence Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: June 27, 2014 Company: Confluence Group Recommended Quote or Bid: Confluence Group General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $94,000 In June, 2014 twenty requests for proposal were mailed to local architects and consulting firms for the Park, Recreation and Trail System Master Plan. Four consulting teams submitted proposals and all were interviewed by the Park Board at the August, 2014 Park Board meeting. Respondents were the Cuningham Group, SRF, SEH and the Confluence Group. Confluence provides landscape architecture, urban design and planning services with offices in Minneapolis, Des Moines, Kansas City, Sioux Falls and Iowa City. Other Confluence Group team members are Pros Consulting (Indianapolis), 292 Design (Minneapolis), Dreambox (Minneapolis) and Barr Engineering (Minneapolis). The Park Board selected the Confluence Group to complete the master plan. The Park Board will be actively engaged throughout the entire master planning process. Other components of the master plan currently in progress are the Community Survey (ETC Institute) and GIS study and inventory (GTG). The community survey results will be presented by Ron Vine on October 20, 2014 and the GIS study will be completed in October 2014. The Confluence and Pros Consulting teams have done dozens of park master /strategic plans and needs assessments throughout the country. Confluence has assembled a team that will provide tremendous value to the city. Staff recommends retaining Confluence for the Edina Park, Recreation and Trail System Master Plan. If approved, work on the master plan will begin in September with the goal of completion in 12 months. City Attorney Knutson has provided a professional services contract which will be executed after receiving City Council approval. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 IZ :PORT / R : C 40MM : NDA'TI®N To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: September 2, 2014 Subject: France Avenue Corridor Improvement Project Action Requested: None. Informational Presentation O `> lit (1) o ���oRroA ,�g0 e Agenda Item #: V. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information x❑ Information / Background: Representatives from LHB will be presenting the elements of the urban design for the referenced project. The urban design includes incorporating elements of landscaping and lighting. The lighting portion of the project will focus on the intersections of 66th St, 70th St, and 76th St and France Ave. The urban design was developed to create an identity to this corridor. We tried to create a streetscape to draw non - motorists to the area, particularly at the enhanced intersections and to begin to create the interface between the public and private realm. We hope by applying the groundwork, that the private realm will follow suit to create areas of activity centered around pedestrians. Attachment: Draft Lighting Illustration showing three lights G:\PW\CENTRALSVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTMCONTRACTS\2014\ENG 14 -15 France Ave Lighting\ADMIN_L- 61 \MISC \Item xx. France Avenue Pedestrian Enhancements Urban Design.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St. • Edina, MN 55424. DRAFT LIGHTING ILLUSTRATION . t, 14 To: Mayor and Council From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Date: September 2, 2014 Agenda Item #. VI. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License — St. Patrick's Catholic Church September 27, 2014 Action Requested: Approve the Temporary Intoxicating On -Sale Liquor License for the Church of St. Patrick's, Oktoberfest. Information / Background: The Church of St. Patrick has applied for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for their "Oktoberfest" event. The event will be held in the on -site social hall and in the adjoining kitchen on September 27, 2014 from 6:15 PM to 10:30 PM. The applicants are eligible for the Liquor. License and have submitted plans to meet the special requirements for a Temporary License under City Code. There have been no problems with prior temporary licenses issued to this facility. The Church of St. Patrick has hired the Edina Police Department to provide security for this event. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 o e • ,4C�RPOB �� • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI. B. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — Consider Vacation of Public Right -of -Way, Portion of West 41st Street, Resolution No. 2014 -91 Action Requested: Approve attached Resolution No. 2014 -91. Information / Background: This request comes from the property owner at 4022 Monterey Avenue. The existing right -of -way (ROW) is 50 -ft wide. The applicant is requesting vacating the northern 30 -ft of the ROW. The City would retain the southern 20 -ft of the 41 n Street ROW for existing and future utility alignments. It would also be available for any potential future trail connections between Monterey Avenue and Natchez Avenue or the Susan Linden Elementary School both located in St. Louis Park. The property owner wants the ability to clean up this area without having to worry about the City installing infrastructure. The area is heavily overgrown with voluntary shrubs and miscellaneous vegetation. The City has a storm sewer pipe located along West 41st Street that connects a storm sewer system located in St. Louis Park, see attached graphic. Staff contacted the private utilities requesting feedback. CenterPoint Energy, Centuryl-ink and Xcel Energy do not object to this vacation. We did not hear from Comcast but their facilities are overhead on power poles. Miscellaneous portions of the West 41 st Street ROW has been vacated to the east of Monterey Avenue, as shown in the attached graphic. The Edina Comprehensive Plan does not indicate future roadways, sidewalk, or trails within the proposed vacation area. Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2014 -91 Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -91 Public Right Of Way Vacation Application with sketches Notice of Public Hearing City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -91 VACATING A PORTION OF WEST 41ST STREET -t f WHEREAS, a petition was received on July ' 10, 2014, from the property owner of 4022 Monterey Avenue who owns the property abutting West�41st Street dedicated in the plat of Minikanda Vista, Third Addition, Morningside, Minnesota, requesting that it be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on September 2, 2014, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the easement is not needed for public purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described right -of -ways are hereby vacated: That part of West 41st Street, being 30 feet in width,. as dedicated in the recorded plat of MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD`ADDITION MORNNGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the southerly extensions of the east and west lines Lot 12, Block 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in' the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the transfer of this property. Dated: September 2, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do he certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at•its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and. as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_ City "Clerk ENGINEERING IYEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov o 952- 826 -0371 -,Fax 952-826-0392 City Of Edina, Minnesota .� o DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION �1 ` 4801 West 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Phone 1 (952) 927 -8861 TDD 1 (952) 826 -0379 Fax 1 (952) 826 -0390 t„ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION Applicant J acs ��, r SG�I e (•Z Print Name Address 4 k� � Ayy nA e / V1.0, (o Street City/State Zip Telephone No. b 2 (O 5 5 Fax No. N � I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 24 -191: Street ❑ Alley ❑ Utility Easement ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Other Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically in a Word documents to the City of Edina City Clerk. DmangenQedinamn.gov): Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? ❑ Yes g No Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing in full detail the area proposed to be vacated. Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data Is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax /D Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Deppriment of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of information submitted in the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Number _ h r /1 ,) r-' Date Initiated Signature 04/21/2014 Amount No. 1001.4391 &nk r-O ot'AA-he HARRY S. JOHNSON LAND SURVEYORS 9063 Lyndole Ave. So. Bloomington, MN. 55420 phone -952- 884 -5341 fox:952- 884 -5344 Certificate of Survey for Jacquelyn Gerhardt N. LINE OF LOT 12, BLOCK 4, ,r-MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE WEST LINE OF LOT 12, BLOCK 4, l` MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD 04`rTADDITION MORNINGSIDE I / I S. LINE OF N. 6.00 FEET OF LOT 12, BLOCK 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD + I • ri% I ADDITION MORNINGSIDE ��� N " E ,/ p E. LINE OF LOT 12, BLOCK 4, % �rJ % %� "� I r MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD `` � W J�� °f ��J� I % ADDITION MORNINGSIDE 80w - N 89'34'33' E 133.80 t i z4,z � % 4 24.2 4 �, // � ♦ I 4Q N, U ^ W I aFY00lP 1.232 SQ. FTN p GYM r J RINT Z J W' 1 80 M L- _ —WI* 13 S 89 35'05' W 133.90 SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF ii'EST 4"S' STREET �' E. LINE OF LOT 12, BLOCK SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF UNIMPROVED MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD _WEST LINE OF LOT 12, _ ADDITION MORNINGSIDE — — — — -- —BLOCK 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD— — — — — — 1 ADDITION MORNINGSIDE 50 VV IL.L.WI VI .J%d%J I I Z nUVI 11\J1 V I I FAI STREET VAICATION PROPERTY DEW 111 AS That part of West 41st Street, being 30 feet in width, as dedicated in the recorded plat of MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the southerly extensions of the east and west lines Lot 12, Block 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCALE: 1' = W General Notes: 1. Bearings shown are assumed.. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROPOSED STREET VACATION Of Date: June 11, 2014 L-- / Thomas Eeliodorff, L.S. M g. No. 23677 HSJ WO.' 2014233 LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: That part of Lot 12, Block 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying ae/th of the north 6.00 feet thereof. GENERAL NOTES: 1. The bearing system used Is assumed. 2. The location of the underground uthitles shown hereon. If any, are approximate only. PURSUANT TO MSA 216D CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT — (612) 454 -0002 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 3. Site area m 7,655 aquae feet a 0.176 acres. 4. This survey was made an the ground. 5. No current title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey, legal description, recorded or unrecorded easements and n'K encumbrances are subject to revision upon receipt of current title work. f.`. S. Elevation datum is based on NAVO 88 data. Bench mark Is located Top of Nail FOUND (AS SH ON SURVEY) IRON evatloOWN n v 888.26 \ I CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision _ and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Iowa of the State of Minnesota. Date: .Wne 11. 2M4 L—�. Th6mas E Hodwff Minn. Reg. No. 236 ' L EGEW ` FJ� ' ROCK _ WALL 11 J' 0,_FOMD Found Property Monument ; Concrete 1 �A Ij Concrete Curb �7 ■ x ■ x 11- Fence —•• Overhead Electric �J. W —..... Underground Electric , — • —w —w— —a Water " Gas x �O1 - - -uic— Sanitary Sewer N -- —ax-- Storm Sewer I[)� O 0 Electric Meter Power Pole 0� ® Catchbasin Z ® Catchbasln ® Air Conditioning Unit 1 � Deciduous Tree (Dla. in In.) i1 0 Sanitary Manhole — — 0 Stem Manhole -- — _ --906— Existing Contour D Existing Spot t� X 934.9 Existing Spot Elevation i CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision _ and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Iowa of the State of Minnesota. Date: .Wne 11. 2M4 L—�. Th6mas E Hodwff Minn. Reg. No. 236 FINISHED FLOOR ELEV- 890.46 F N. &00 FEET OF LOT 12, MINIKAHDA VISTA 30 MORNINGSIDE nom. A CJ t FINISHED FLOOR i i _ ELEV.- 886.26 r i a. ° 1 N 89'34'33" E \rJ CONC. STAIRS I 36.4 X 20 10 0 20 N. LINE OF LOT 12, 4, SCALE IN FEET MINIKANDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDEI 1 9.01G �1 �iRETAINING, 1 m (WALL / FOUND / / ' / 1y j IRON 140.4 _— •538.9'— z "' -'.' HSJ BENCHMARK TOP OF NAIL jtu LfJ �C ' \ ` FJ� ' FINISHED FLOOR ELEV- 890.46 F N. &00 FEET OF LOT 12, MINIKAHDA VISTA 30 MORNINGSIDE nom. A CJ t FINISHED FLOOR i i _ ELEV.- 886.26 r i a. ° 1 N 89'34'33" E \rJ CONC. STAIRS I 36.4 X 20 10 0 20 N. LINE OF LOT 12, 4, SCALE IN FEET MINIKANDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDEI 1 9.01G �1 �iRETAINING, 1 m (WALL / FOUND / / ' / 1y j IRON 140.4 _— •538.9'— z "' -'.' HSJ BENCHMARK TOP OF NAIL jtu LfJ �C FT� o Q . STAIRS` 1. ----38.7__ FL7 - — ; -- 0 ml �• � a;l •O � � ti� 60 �9 fv1.� -- ^£R '*J CHIMNEY —� `79s /i 89'35'05" W 133.86 ° ROCK 1 FOUND_7� WALL ' Q0t -b •0 %A J T A -IC--r STREET �c / UNIMPROVED FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.-888.45 f�++ 996 $ E g1h 0,0- x 9, N y, M Uf v rnaa m o 3 D—i .Srom ; o uNiu`,,n,i,, ��° °m S a, m�:M3 W W N 8Il1sll1%) y ,8. LL CAD R. 2e42=Wr Page 4t\201123AM\ ' IjEY AVENUE C C ' fv1.� -- ^£R '*J CHIMNEY —� `79s /i 89'35'05" W 133.86 ° ROCK 1 FOUND_7� WALL ' Q0t -b •0 %A J T A -IC--r STREET �c / UNIMPROVED FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.-888.45 f�++ 996 $ E g1h 0,0- x 9, N y, M Uf v rnaa m o 3 D—i .Srom ; o uNiu`,,n,i,, ��° °m S a, m�:M3 W W N 8Il1sll1%) y ,8. LL CAD R. 2e42=Wr Page 4t\201123AM\ STREET VACATION PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: That part of West 41st Street, being 30 feet in width, as dedicated in the 'recorded plat of MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the southerly extensions of the east and west lines Lot 12, Block 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SO NO 273 taa tale uls a tlae s ua (ea 7) ° 1:0) ° (96) u tnq vfc TA Y, n nie ues s. ,vi µle (97) is -all ° (74) t a. the . 4 c �- (Se) 6 m (75) 9 m. til � (76) y (ES)O ue tats las t (56) ,ae ,ns m7 • ,us Requeste uJ .y (1,6) f9U I 1 .ae V - - - ---- _ ,». taa• m SO NO 273 taa we M m e tlae ,vi ua (ea 7) ° 1:0) ° me u tnq vfc TA n f+:) ° nie ues s. ,vi ° (03)� n+ the 7 0.') �- ia�ie d vacation. (56) .. we uas las (56) ,ae SO NO 273 I mI 7 T (a7) uo s ,N n a 1„) 127) tN pma� _ (43) ° F 1:6) 2 ° 1 ' t ly 1 r I Note prE aa f39) (a3) (3+) I ,aa tn- ,I Q 41ST , 1. ST W s e ooe a ID .776 .. f -. a Ori7L / F 1 A s� a w x UK N A � I10 ,o g' / t & a WTY OF EDIMA mom; li i I7 ! ill , 8 u UK N A � I10 ,o g' / t & a WTY OF EDIMA mom; li i I7 ! ill , n y a V) y 0 J v Q f N W N ~C / Q / Z �. City of Edina Utilities 0 a o U ri ID m Ni z M .- -r 4 si +e2 T 47-'-- as - 4006 - - -_ - -- 4 -_ ' - 475• r- - - - - -- S S1 +35 i - --- �_ -___ 4 40081 r - - - - -- — — Y Q' a LA- M. aJ Vl TR877.66 ■ I ', 4117; : S1 +63 :101 50 +34 7 1- 4006 ys 4008 - S1 +61 - -y 401.0 T - S1 +13 4012 -Ts So +64 4014 r S0 +12 —y- sl +an i� 4��02Q ;49- Tw9mwp- , 98 -- - ---ra 4022 97 TR872.76 INV868.06 = 867.66 ,40 +49 100 h7,;4' '6 r - - - - -- ;4104 S1 +30 LS1 +32— ' 4108 IQ4 � IS2 +21 TR875�71 - - - -- DPAM X64 r- - - - - -- eo eo 1 4112 i :SO +64 er 1 a i. 4116 gr :SS +49 �`.IS1 +55 STATE OF.MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the .following date August 20, 2014, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States . mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing- Right -of -Way Easement (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records% of.the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to . the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITN SS my hand and Ihe seal of said City this.d� ay of 20 . v dina ity Jerk w9l��j�l. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 , West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the following public right -of -way easement: ; PROPOSED DESCRIPTION That part of West 415` Street; being 30 feet in width, as dedicated in the recorded plat of MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION MORNNGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the southerly extensions of the east and west lines Lot 12, Block 4, MINIKAHDA VISTA 3RD ADDITION, MORNINGSIDE, MINNESOTA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Open space next to 4022 Monterey Avenue.) All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation ,is in -the public interest and should be made shall- be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed, vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes; mains; and-'hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof, vacated to maintain,, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Dated: August 20, 2014 . ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 ' 702824130010 702824130011 702824130012 Robert & Lianne Beyerl Glenn & Dorae S Binder Michael & Megan M Flynn 4169 Monterey Ave 4105, Monterey Ave 4101 Monterey Ave Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 702824130060 702824130061 702824130062 Oriol & Maureen E Valls Andrew Guzman & Susan Dunne- Robert Harriss . 4021 Monterey Ave Guzman 4015 Monterey Ave. Edina, MN 55416 4019 Monterey Ave Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 702824130077 702824130077 702824130078 Diana C Cooper Michael L Miller Kevin B Faus & Kathleen M Robison 4005 Natchez Ave 4014 Monterey Ave 4016 Monterey Ave Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 102824130079 702824130080 - 702824130081 •t Meredith L Anderson Milacnik Jacquelyn.A Gerhardt Independent, Sch Dist #283 23204 Grasst Pine Dr 4022 Monterey Ave 6425 W 33rd St Estero, FL.33928 Edina, MN 55416 Minneapolis, MN 55426 702824130082 702824130083 702824130079 Robert J O'Brien Harris & Jean C Hubers Current Resident 4019 Natchez Ave 4017 Natchez Ave 4020 Monterey Ave Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 Edina, MN 55416 Logis Map Page 1 of 1 tom,, Q Ualti 7 } �„• r -i, Lg7C 1 PIiB Il FlmlFsyhe� l lryvt � Fdlmt � T� li [amm�lt I PA 4 r cL �rrc _ � c :JX�r�nGtry1[.9i= 'rt;e7 -- Jha. _.lid.. i W%�Ifr._° 1 Y.0 i ,Y I 0.t6 I �,... { q I I •rrti lNz1Lk�ErcL1� '- •� J,L -19.a° "lu', NW....I ..I.'.i ._.�'1- -y,17 — {,6_ i'J 14iQ I _I ' • �`•: III" Ip -.I `Itll .;iti�� I i _ I i ? � . '.. IN.e_' .I:�L•' —I Ill) -7,1? !i•L— lifi_- —y,V ... I i \ 1 ' 1 J 01' �l i;! I • " j�y3 1'� I j J'I'• i k.lY ; r—� I to � d'U 1 r : I lw — 'i`�PI�' If , { iilI' ?'IOi. �J 1 Ji r t,a ,ll 7 ji 3r0� II •! t � IUi f r l :,' q _ _ :.I illy — art a . 11 mrt c, ,9 I ter i nit `, E I: �I 01�_. 771 W., Oil J i 4324 , 4V-4,,,A;4,!((; h2 isi. I I !: I I. x1: J�,I i — , �. . J J Ja,l �IT 1gf llt� Oti Ii111:1J1( Jrr 7'I 1�1 I' {.11.19 J r 1211 IJI ,Ill lr - nq xr alit I ' ';{ Jr 1 12 I e'II ii L it + Jt it I ..LP CIS- 1Q i "7 qEA _ PIC � r 421' OD 7: I f Jl', .. : 1II L' ^• ! %e. J7f L i. ., � I _ �i '� I_ t —_j __ � l� 'r-•- ^r- Yrrs.O , _I,;'I'' irf,i http: / /gis.logis.org /10gismap/ 8/20/2014 I o • ,� �RPOPAT�9 0 IB88 .. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Conditional Use Permit to allow a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing floor elevation, 4603 Annaway Drive for Nicole and Greg Jennings, Resolution No. 2014 -92 Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council, Decision — September 9, 2014) The applicants are proposing, to tear down the existing house and construct a new home at 4603 Annaway Drive. A Conditional Use Permit:is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.4 above the existing first floor elevation for the purpose of the low floor, elevation to be at. least 2 feet above the 100 -year flood elevation. (See applicant narrative and plans in the attached Planning Commission staff report.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On August 13, 2014, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014 -92 • Planning Commission minutes, August 13, 2014 • Planning Commission staff report dated August 13, 2014 I w91�.►r RESOLUTION NO. 2014-92 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 4603 ANNAWAY DRIVE FOR NICOLE AND GREG JENNINGS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to tear down and construct a new home at 4924 Annaway Drive. 1.02. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.4 feet above the existing first floor elevation to elevate the home 2 feet above the 100 -year flood plain. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Gunnar Johnson's Second rearrangement Rolling Green, Hennepin County, MN 1.04 On August 13, 2014, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance Section 36 -305. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a new home at 4603 Annaway Drive, subject to. the following conditions: CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov 1,952-927-8861' -,Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-92 Page Two • Survey date stamped June 23, 2014 • Building plans and elevations date stamped June 23, 2014 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments. listed in the Env_ ironmental Engineer's memo dated August 1, 2014. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on September 2, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I. the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk MINUTE SUMMARY OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 13, 2014 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Ill. ROLL Answering the roll Members absent from ro III. APPROVAL Forrest Lee, Ki , Olsen EETING`AGENDA Carr, Platteter, Staunton Commissioner Platteter moved ap va1 of the meeting agenda. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motio ried. IV. APPROVAL OF ONSE T AGENDA Commissioner Carr mov d approval of the ly 9 2014, meeting minutes with one correction. Commissioner Plattet seconded the motio All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMKUNITY COMMENT Chair Staunt asked if anyone would like to speak; N eing none, Commissioner Lee moved to close com unity comment. Commissioner Forrest s onded the motion. All voted aye; public commeritclosed. V/. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. Conditional Use Permit. K. Alexander. 4603 Annaway Drive, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Rothstein reported that Kathryn Alexander has submitted a Conditional Use Permit on behalf of the property owners to increase the first floor elevation 4.4 feet higher than the current first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 4603 Annaway Drive. This property is located on the northernmost edge of Edina in the Rolling Green neighborhood and a portion of the property is located in the floodplain. A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The current home located at 4603 Annaway Drive has a first floor elevation at 889.3 feet above sea level. This neighborhood in Edina is located in a floodplain area, and the currently established floodplain elevation is 889.4. Therefore, the entire basement of the existing home is in the `floodplain. Continuing, Rothstein explained that City Code allows for the issuance of a conditional use permit to increase the first floor elevation of a new home over one foot above the existing home under one of the following circumstances: 1) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100 - year flood elevation, as established by FEMA; 2) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to protect from groundwater intrusion; 3) To elevate the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the state building code, city code, or statutory requirements; Furthermore, a conditional use permit may only be issued if the proposed project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. Rothstein further explained that this property is situated at an elevation. that is currently just above the floodplain. FEMA has submitted draft revisions to the existing floodplain elevation of 889.4 to increase the flood elevation to 891.0. The city has conducted an independent model and disputed the proposed FEMA elevation, suggesting instead a flood elevation of 890.0. Whatever the determination (891 or 890) a portion of this lot would be in the revised floodplain. Therefore, the applicant is seeking to establish a grade „low floor.elevation at 892.0, which would be I (or 2 feet) above the newly established floodplain. City code requires a 2 foot separation between floodplain and lowest floor elevations. Furthermore, :the building code now requires increased minimum ceiling height in basements and a minimum of 12 inch floor. trusses. In staffs analysis, the proposed home fits the character of the neighborhood with regard to height, scale,'and massing. There have been several teardown /re- builds in this neighborhood, the proposed home is below the maximum height restrictions, and the large lots make it easier to meet requirements for lot coverage and setbacks. Therefore, the first floor elevation request meets the eligibility requirements for consideration of a conditional use permit. Planner Rothstein concluded that staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: O Survey date stamped June 23, 2014 O Building plans and elevations date stamped June. 23, 2014 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo dated August 1, 2014. Appearing for the Applicant. K. Alexander, Alexander Design Group, Inc. and Nicole Jennings, property owner. Discussion A discussion ensued on basement ceiling height and if. the building code has a minimum basement ceiling height requirement. Staff reported that the Uniform Building Code stipulates ceiling height at 7 -feet minimum. Applicant Presentation Ms. Alexander reported that the subject lot is low laying in nature and has a drainage easement running through it. Alexander explained the main floor elevation would be 903.7 with the current house main floor at 899.3. Alexander explained the new basement elevation would be at 892, which is I (or-2-feet) above the newly established flood plain. Continuing, Alexander said all setbacks are met; the lot is large and very private. Concluding, Alexander stated the back yard would not be filled and drainage would remain fine with the overall height of the new home 2'8 3/4" below the required building height. Alexander asked for the Commissions support. Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All vote aye; public hearing closed,. Motion Commissioner Carr m' oved Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff' findings and'subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded 'the motion. Commissioner Forrest commented that she feels the proposed ceiling height for the basement is too high; it could be lowered. She did acknowledge the new home when completed does meet the allowable building height. Chair Staunton pointed out the height of the proposed house when completed remains below what's allowed, adding in his opinion the new house fits in well with the neighborhood. Staunton reminded Commissioners that this Conditional Use process is a "left over" from the variance moratorium. Concluding, Staunton stated the Commission may want to revisit this process. Chair Staunton called for the vote; all voted aye; motion carried. S, -0. w9t��r� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Breanne Rothstein, August 13, 2014 Consulting Planner 2014 -11 Recommended Action: Approve a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a new home more than one foot above (4.4 feet total) the existing first floor elevation at the property located at 4603 Annaway Drive. Project Description: Kathryn Alexander has submitted a conditional use permit on behalf of the property owners to.increase the first floor elevation 4.4 feet higher than the current first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 4603 Annaway Drive. This property is located on the northernmost edge of Edina in the Rolling Green neighborhood and a portion of the property is located in the floodplain. INFORMATION & BACKGROUND A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The current home located at 4603 Annaway Drive has a first floor elevation at 889.3 feet above sea level. This neighborhood in Edina is located in a floodplain area, and the currently established floodplain elevation is 889.4. Therefore, the entire basement of the existing home is in the floodplain. Eligibility Requirements for Issuance of.a Conditional Use Permit City Code allows for the issuance of a conditional use permit to increase the first floor elevation of a new home over one foot above the existing home under one of the following circumstances: 1) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by FEMA; 2) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to protect from groundwater intrusion; 3) To elevate the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the state building code, city code, or statutory requirements; Furthermore, a conditional use permit mayonly be issued if.the proposed project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. This property is situated at an elevation that is currently just above the floodplain. FEMA has submitted draft revisions to the existing floodplain elevation of 889.4 to increase the flood elevation to 891.0. The city has conducted an independent model and disputed the proposed. FEMA elevation, suggesting instead an flood elevation of 890.0. Whatever the determination (891 or 890) a portion of this lot would be in the revised floodplain: Therefore, the applicant is seeking to establish a grade, low floor elevation at 892.0, which'would be 1 (or 2 feet) above the newly established floodplain. City code requires a;2 foot separation between floodplain and lowest floor elevations. Furthermore, the building code now requires increased minimum ceiling height in basements and a. minimum of 12 inch floor trusses. In staffs: analysis, the proposed home- -fits -the character of the neighborhood with regard to height, .scale, and massing.. There have been several teardown /re- builds in this neighborhood, the proposed homes is below the maximum height restrictions, and:the.Iarge lots make it easier to meet requirements for lot coverage and setbacks. Therefore, the first floor elevation request meets the eligibility requirements for consideration of a conditional use permit. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Meadowbrook Golf Course in Saint Louis Park. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low- density , residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low- density residential. Westerly: Meadowbrook Golf Course in Saint Louis Park. Existing Site Features The existing 52,140 square foot (1.19 acre) lot is located immediately adjacent to the Meadowbrook Golf Course, and has a tw.o -story, two car, garage on the property. The site is heavily treed in the rear of the lot and serves as a buffer, between the existing home and the clubhouse for the golf course. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low- Density Residential Zoning: R -1, Single- Dwelling District 2 Grading & Drainage The grading must not impact adjacent neighbors. The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments in the attached memo. He has no major concerns with the proposed work. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 36- 305,.the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The proposal for a tear down and rebuild of a new single - family home will not have an impact on governmental facilities or services. A single- family home is a permitted use on the site. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; The proposal to tear down and rebuild a single - family home would not have an impact on traffic or the capacity of the streets serving the property. The use, a single- family home, remains the.same on the property. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; There would be no impact, as the use of the property remains the same as exists today. Increasing the elevation of the proposed home will increase the safety and welfare of the home and its inhabitants by decreasing the flood risk. 4. Will not impede the normal and, orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The proposed .new home would replace an existing home on the site and would not impede future development of other properties in the vicinity. 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and The new home would meet all applicable zoning ordinance requirements. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3 A single - family home is consistent with the low- density residential land use designation within the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance Table PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Does the proposed new home meet the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit with a first floor elevation 4.4 feet higher than the existing home? Staff believes the proposal meets the criteria for a conditional use permit to allow the first floor elevation 4.4 feet higher than the existing home for the following four reasons: 1) The proposed home design elevates the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the city- proposed 100 -year flood elevation of 890.0 (and one foot above the proposed FEMA elevation); 2) The proposed home design elevates the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the state building code with regard to minimum ceiling heights and minimum floor truss size; 3) The proposed home design project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass; 4) The request meets the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, given the following findings: a. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance Section 36 -305. 4 City Standard Proposed Front — Annaway Drive 48 feet 57.4 feet Side -South 17.5 feet (farthest) 20.5 feet Rear— East 25 feet 58 feet Side — North 10 feet 36 feet Building Coverage 25% 10.3% Building Height 40 feet 34 feet PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Does the proposed new home meet the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit with a first floor elevation 4.4 feet higher than the existing home? Staff believes the proposal meets the criteria for a conditional use permit to allow the first floor elevation 4.4 feet higher than the existing home for the following four reasons: 1) The proposed home design elevates the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the city- proposed 100 -year flood elevation of 890.0 (and one foot above the proposed FEMA elevation); 2) The proposed home design elevates the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the state building code with regard to minimum ceiling heights and minimum floor truss size; 3) The proposed home design project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass; 4) The request meets the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, given the following findings: a. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions of the Zoning Ordinance Section 36 -305. 4 b. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. c. The proposal fits the character with this neighborhood. d. The proposal does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; e. The proposal will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; f. The proposal does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; g. The proposal will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; h. The proposal conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and i. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped June 23, 2014 • Building plans and elevations date stamped June 23, 2014 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments. listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo dated August 1, 2014. Deadline for a city decision: September 9, 2014 5 Explanation of Request We are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to raise the main floor of the new house to be more than 1' -0" above that of the existing house. 4603 Annaway is positioned in a low area of Edina. The city is currently in an appeals process with FEMA to determine the new flood plain elevation for this area. It is currently 889.4. FEMA has proposed to change it to 891.0 and the city of Edina is proposing 890.0. Given the low laying nature of this lot and the fact that it has a drainage easement running through it, we are proposing that it would be prudent to raise the main floor of the house so that the basement level of the house stays above the flood plain. With current construction methods of floor trusses and today's ceiling heights, the 12" maximum floor height change code would force the basement floor to be below flood plain. We feel it would be in the best interest of the safety and continued current use of the property to raise the house out of the ground so that the main floor elevation would be 903.7. The current house main floor is at 899.3 so we would be raising the main floor elevation by 4.4' instead of 1' -0 ". This would allow the basement to be at 892.0 In doing so we would still be well within the code parameters for normal building height as measured from average existing grade. We are actually 2' -8 YV below the required building height. If granted, the CUP would in no way affect the general use of the surrounding area or the essential character of the locality. The lot is large and heavily treed. Neighbors are not close or barely visible. The lot is quite private. It would also not affect the health, safety or well -being of the community in any way. It would, however, potentially alleviate wet basement and flooding problems, which #his year, we are all too familiar with. We respectfully ask that you carefully consider this CUP for the safety and well -being of the new family that will be residing there. Thank you in advance for your time and attention to this. =NN `4 ���n�P r V;1 it Jf i' A 30 201 4F-02 4601 4300 Meadowbrook Gol 4616 461.2 4604 460 5 5504 400 5848 24 NIAIT IxNE - -. i 4700 - ' 4701 580 5 4700 4708 4705 el Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 29- 117- 21 -21- 0008 A -T -g: „ - D i Print Date: 8/8/2014 Owner Nicole Jennings Trustee Market Name: Total: Parcel 4603 Annaway Dr Tax Address: Edina, MN 55436 Total: Property Sale Residential Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 1.2 acres Sale Area: 52,345 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A TtiinkGreei! a lie t Parcel 29- 117 -21 -21 -0008 ID: Map Scale: V = 200 ft. N Owner Nicole Jennings Trustee Name: Print Date: 8/8/2014 Parcel 4603 Annaway Dr Address: Edina, MN 55436 Property Residential Type: Home- Homestead stead: This map is a compilation of data from various Parcel 1.2 acres Area: 52,345 sq ft 13 21 .dl�e Map Scale: V = 200 ft. N A -T -B: Print Date: 8/8/2014 Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Sale representation or warranty expressed or Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Sale Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Til+ink- Green' r Ns' _ _�. ±. ...... �f . . . . . . . . . . Parcel 29- 117 -21 -21 -0008 A -T -B: Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N � ID: Print Date: 8/8/2014 Owner Nicole Jennings Trustee Market Name: Total: Parcel 4603 Annaway Dr Tax Address: Edina, MN 55436 Total: Property Sale Residential Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 1.2 acres Sale Area: 52,345 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Tninl. Green! DATE: August 1, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Chad Milner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 4603 Annaway Drive - Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the following ordinance sections: • Chapter 10, Article 4 — Demolition Permit Stormwater and Erosion Control (10 -106 to 10 -1 13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345) • Chapter 10 Article 17 — Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10 -710) • Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2 — Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 — Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department and assumes the provided documents were submitted for building permit review. A more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Land Use /Planning Concerns I. Floodplain fill is insignificant and will be covered by Watershed District permitting process. 2. Variance for floor elevation is justified to lift building low floor above flood elevation. General I. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: www.minnehahacreek.org/ 2. Site survey should follow the standard described in policy SP -005 -B included in the building ep rmit application packet. Street and Curb Gut 3. Application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http://edinam.n.gov/edinafiles/files/City Offices /Public Works/Cu rbCutAppli cation. pdf Sanitary and Water Utilities 4. Show utility connections. Storm Water Utility 5. The subject site front yard drains to subwatershed El-3. capacity is available. 6. The subject site rear yard drains to subwatershed El-25. collection system that drains to the same public system. Downstream public system stormwater This drainage path is through a rear yard storm ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard e Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov 9 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 7. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following links: httls: / /maps.barr.com /edina/ and http: / /edinamn.gov /index.phl2?section = engineering_ water resource. 8. Required storm water and erosion control precautions are described below. Site Storm Water Ordinance Chapter 10, article 4 - Demolition Permits And Building Permits For Single And Two Family Dwelling Units (Sec. 10- 110), states: For a building permit, the applicant must submit stormwater and erosion control plans prepared and signed by a licensed professional engineer. The plans must be approved by the City Engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation. Permit holder must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities may result in sediment laden stormwater runoff entering the inlet. The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must be an integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or obstructions. 9. The following comments apply to the storm water management plan. a. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District standards, if applicable. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 10. The following comments apply to the erosion and sediment control plan: a. Recheck standard notes. Some appear to apply only to commercial or State permitted SWPPP plans. b. Provide erosion and sediment control precautions described under Edina City Code Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345). c. Include provisions for temporary erosion control. (MNDOT 100,1 10, 150 all may be cheaper solution for temp seed, and straw mulch is allowed) d. Identify on the plan the individual responsible for the cleanliness of the site and the maintenance of the erosion and sediment controls. e. Identify pollution prevention techniques that will be used in the case of temporary pumped discharge. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 2014 copyright Alexander Design Group ALEXANDER NJ Jennings Residence -SIGN 3d Model GROUP .Jrj-;",.r4m 'I, ►� lot, CA C C ��`° °. ��� — _ 11111111■ 11.1111111, 1111111, 1111111, � ! 1- 2014 copyright Alexander Design Group ALEXANDER Lit -SIGN 3d Model Rr„ I P Jennings Residence xsvcsifJxs �. p O M+ /DD/rr I u6/41M P ucnhtiun aet s 5 4604 Annaway Drive 2014 copyright Alexander Design Group r , 1 a°� Proposed Home at 4603 Annaway Drive Street Scape ill _ 301_011 4602 Annaway Drive Please Note: These homes are built along a curved roe " the proposed home is seen in straight on elevation . Thetre ghboring homes are seen at true angles to the viewer and are spaced accordingly as the crow flys. REVISIONS ALFiXANDCR NJ Jennings Residence MM /DD/ff REM M 0 LIE-SIGN Street Scape 06/,9/H mpe C GROUP 2 of 8 h4 (1) m7w;371 ELEVATION EAST 310.00! DRAINAGE AND UTSITY EASEMENT ,o I & _ - - - - - - -- - -- Q. I I \\ =' CONTOUR �= b iS7--�,1 �---�,c-- F° - -- - - - - - -�+ f 3 I T- \ App \ ' !! « 69 g I \ \\ \ ` \``,NgCF,� ��OOYFPEELEVATION / ol 1 \ II \ PROPOSED 100YRFPE = 89.0 (FEMA) _ 890.0 (CITY) N 4�15- \# NO PART OF LOT LIES WITHIN - T? +�V>r \ THE EXISTING 100 YRFPE OF 889.4 �\ OR PROPOSED 10OYR FPE OF 890.0 \ k l' EXISTINGO 'fO HOUSE LFf =BDZO #4601 MY-90-17 Gplll MFFE -899.3 X N 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET 40'' = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION. X(998.0)- PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION = DIRECTION SURFACE DRAINAGE COH - CANTILEVERED OVERHANG OHL = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE GFE = GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION TFE - TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION LFE = LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION Jp7� EXIT STING HOUSE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS GARAGE FLOOR = 902.0 MAIN FINSH FLOOR = 903.7 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 902.J(VARIES) LOWEST FLOOR = 892.0 HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE = 5345 SF POOLAR£A 7443 SF (N /C) TOTAL = 5345 SF / 10.3R' 1\ �4� A 1 i Q �Q SCRIPTION LOCK 1, GUNNAR JOHNSON'S REARRANGEMENT ROLLING GREEN, Q Q COUNTY, MN - 4603 ANNAWAY DRIVE PIQ #29- 117 -21 -21 -0008 m Cfl \\ LdT AREA a 52140 SEEN ;�I9�I Ac X 25% = 13035 5F`STRUCTURE- HC ALLOWED SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PE TITLE OR EASEMENT INFORMATIQW _: @t VERIFY ALL SETBACKS WITH CITY n }SVY '111 7 O K '111 7 O e 5 5 or- 8 P II II ---- - - - - --- i __ I – – --- - ------ --- ii ii I I I I ii ii I I I i� +• w >O _ _____ _ _ _ _ _ __ I a" Go I a -- - - - -II rr I AR. �: a � _ I I I amjn II II .I r I II it - - - - - - - i r t / � i w , I II '• I I..o ; r---- - - - - -- e I I I 1 I — - ..... in I I I , I �y I J E ail MAIN LIVCL MOM PLM I a xallARe worrrE I - IIPPER • IB37� R - 3336 TOTAL - 61B1� DEBT &IITE - bT1� BPORf GGURi - 1�09� II fir_— _---- ____JJ 11 11 11 1'- ---- - - - - -- -- ----� I 11 11 II II II II II II ,1 II II Y O II I1 !M It [rv1 y G' ,I ®6701 aim 11 jl S Ga I- II II II 11 tl I • o 11 4✓gL Uppm LEAL KA)m PLAN 9alARE FOOTAGE MAIN - 3586. UPPER - ID33. FM. L 33361 TOi DISH GUE9T JIIITE - bll� BFORf LOURf - 1109• II II II II 11 Y1ll 1 1 ,I 11 0 11 II II I ILL-- II II II II II II II II II I� II I, GAL II II II II II II II II I, II II II 1, .-Il. mdu= I 1 - II II II II II 1, ,1 l----------------- ®.F..o.aFF.rn... �� �_— ___. -_ —_ — _ —_ —_ ��_ ___ TL vR.rurizvmwrurarw,vnersnc �eR.rrus�TM�.... �.e�e��� ------- ______.___\ I __ __ \ '1 \ ruasrcnarERfelatsumrzana wn fm urrnrfnrsrwr .n.vrzvms.snrass muvrmammrts. y��r ,♦ , � \ siwcigrxto.b¢urxrs unu.xrwaumc.wExccs,nauousnuxcr uclusurxrssxaAOer rasorep ww..w.rw.r. 1 ''°°..v'aF° "� , \\ \�= T�1'— � \\` \\ .r�aawrrwwro�E9,c�nr9iauRxomsst �rr� or''Y°'ie>,rrMm nu�iClFm�oswoasese�q Z V ® I1 � \ \\ I 1 II � Ptvles� el A �f /' r \R i I \\ (\ � I•I lfi wurFmFmrFewwc,rFCanrwrcna rwssa mmsmoacr .w.rxscronwxcrora rar ooswcx.uautwme wou'wrt s,onernoaarvmx,xuqurum »ServA, ,Ices Mur,s �..mr.n•� 4s�. �.�e W _ wrs,a�N�Rr;a ` __ ' - ' i i; ,_ii � /;; amrarsv...occvuxrs ''4AM1"°rmswmm�raooaos•.raoro,as muarrumeoa evm�,r.r..rs e,r_xrurooao..FnrarusreEr®, rxtsrrENrw,rvEwov.wmrswc n.. SHEET SET INDEX 1 PIAY �"��°^I°a - ..�wrre.mxu,.aa.rns C G 0 3D 60 ,tom" / ^ "- "s "" sacra. oevcavonrcv SCALE IN FEET PHASE �' "- �_ 1 ,\ /�' ,nr�muxrnioxumsr,ocrMCRnuwuu RuFxzs sarccxsrnucnon �n+�" I, ~ .owrwrt cw+rxwicw vwr witsr..i u�wnrnu<wma, uxwrcrvne. r.wrrr.c.nsxcrcvc.+ca cn ` ` or.vfzwnumu.xwu.msu.oum , nno sacururwx. neuuawwwxLwa rvR Q - "��^''� _� �. —__ —_ ___ '� ___ _S�7'Ir�'— `'�� - - -- ___rYl'1^r — rGEV..xm. y<GasrnuuvuE'u warsx ma ws. iµo a v�uwammw mnuu�xSV n`a ram -wrrsrusuraw omnvsnmx �os nnimrs.ec��ruw<rt �.wncrrvacr.cunes.um r�nm�iw.rumfurwacs uFw[eor ���'��e� /j_�' /J` /J. Q I I El 11111 'soouwmFUmxamvuxcruv. Dams Hater wrrovrunavu Rr.o�vrFUGa. ,ESf I `I -- —� �� �'. ` ��L�xun ». caxsrw. s. cow.uc..c,rx�FCwevmecsa n.warsveF.v.canrw.em, raG rw -uru Z I n I 1 `�� �. li< • �- � \ wm / Ipr \\ aRxsrunrrwxEE,rRro�swo wcra ,w, a ¢c,nrn Rsrt RE rsur.nx,urrunuo worrtnEUUtuw Z O '� ~ ��y \\ _ - � 1 -� I � I W � Yr ' r x.0 a .c anc srp¢rrwu RcOY.EYMCEe swr.scwxRauiuxsrs vuso.cw�wrsenraxs ' L .� Lu E }' a W LEGEND _.'°arw.r.w"°r..r°'g u 66 66 PHASE SCALEINFEET --- -_ 2 •N,'r` E %ISTING PROPOSED �, ®�,� -� Rrv�rR. r „rmrEr,masa „wn=r„E..w<frra.�wn. rmxaaLw- .sRRE9 ro�wsw.<�caxr� wG.aRRE „a a, aw.�.�. as<"w wr'ivEOswsr xoRc 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN o X w tirARr:� Qi .a.r� .�.ra »r,...e....r...o., •� ,. ti %T :';.v SUPPLEMENTAL ESC AND STORMWATER NOTES: ,. aEVnno_'on,w nwRUn, aravEUmormnEns FrnrunTxcRwcoaunnal crnrwr RDESnESCOnsIOLEronsECUmncncc £ssFCn nNr rrpnxER,Enowp9Eraro TlrE wo ^” °i1 G V FEMA FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION wx .amwr,r. / rF�J rwrouarerwrrmn ✓.uomumr,ruwrw. a,v su..crcovnorurru.osrovnvu. xn.0 •sswsar or oaar.cwureorrxmT � v a.ERrr aouwonnr. mIE *o Tx Dn 4EWSTRkILncwc Nl EVSnncpr MVISEXETIMOOPcrwERFLpwRmiTES wEnE nor nrrAL -10 npru EreE nEnnurEnLOVrs ExKrnc unOELEVnnals. vawosEO usiwc SIDEwTw EvA> ISvmxw EASEUENr ua IECRESTORATCrrsIH`OMNtION MOT 9PECFF➢BT ax1ER0x/ssEn NIF.186NULFE SFELFD NI „M EEO MRYIOOrr LOY9EDY9NOM0 (OIIERAAMQt P14LLW UY OF ar.xrr m® ATP w.w,vwnm RwaRo �r9�•• enu. .nwrJ os��~s uo.aoEUwmROFams,mnE , arwuE . ac . tFnrrw.Frv9FEEr 'co sm,a, �,ra• uRFr.wcoam,Rruerr . w,lor �c«Law wkEi9u�oarr9wneDa,.onc nDarEU,r.,oeuFlFxme„ 1n 14 "° w.ar.R tae ro Ep CEK REQRR O'E 3 �E, g a a 59 K Npi FII, q VM{ OJ161RUCigM FEtNE 91CLL0 BE R.� N4A ACCESS UA pRIwErvsrtoCATKK15. _ �ro r .+nrvwn,a CONTRM FENCE DETAIL CONSiROC110N nCCESS PID us fult4 ISE (1) PM" ILLIVAMON 111111 EW-5 Mi- Vto ra Fir; I E=7-n- i 11 1 1 OF 8 + s� 2014 copyright Alexander Design .Group y • 41%, t. *1 1 *. ALEXANDER , DESIGN "; 3d Model p OU p GR Jennings Residence -- - - — - -- -- - - — REVISIONS MM /DD /YY REMARKS 1 o6/19/14 presentation set z 4 5 ����� ■ mom mom m 0 tm '.. w w - i M �. 2014 copyright Alexander Design Group U r REVISIONS ALEXANDER Jennings Residence Mt; °;'4 REMARKS presentation set DESIGN 3 2 DESIGN d Model �. -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- -- ( ,�r' 3 GROUF 4 5 It- °o 46o4 .-Ann-awAy-',Dri*ve Proposed Home at 4603 Annaway Drive 2014 copyright Alexknde:r,,DeOjg 1Gro.up 4602 Annaway Drive Please These homes are built along a curved r:oad.`6 y the proposed home is seen in straight on elevation The-ffeig—hboring homes are seen at true angles to the viewer and are spaced accordingly as the crow flys. ALEXANDER., DESIGN Street ape GROUP . Jennings Residence REVISIONS MM/DD/YY REMARKS i .6/19 /14 street scape 3 41 151 r-4 °o E'A5T:Z20 00 r 9oti� 90 6 f' _r r I I p ,'3NiA�VAGEiI� °:11I9M CASEi�NT 900 \ \�` — _.— — — — — — „AD'l —r_____��_� �_�_� � '`_ -�- - 896 ---1-- D' -..- -- - - - - - - -- % - Q �\ ,o .+ , �1• �-� `\. ` ��� ` A� \� - '-POSSIBLE' FUTURE •. �' 00YFP. I:ELEVAiION vp- \ \ 1 'EXISTING. 100 -YR FPE- =.889.4 J \ : PROPOSED 100YRFPE -891.0 (FEW) Y0 .,(CITY) NO sPART OF LOT -LIES WITHIN THE FX /STING 100 YRFPE ;OF 889.4 OR PROPOSED 100YR .FPF, OF 890.0 N a I G9� EXISTING 9GF HOUSr LF£ =8920 #460 MF£- -9037 G /Fj���e MFFE =899.3 X /\ / / i� — z 4� \ C O,o Os a \ N MVK� Y/Y VJ )MACE 11N ' �� �\ /TFE =901.5 1-4 -- -- - -- 896 -- - '/ Wrl/ i WAL f "— 94 \ Zk- 0 .r.:20 -40 =�80 EXISTING - J HOUSE 61 `.�� - SCALE IN "FEET "BMTING `.SPOT : ELEVATION. ' i°ROPDSED" :QEVA710NS HARDCOVER X(998 OpRO1?OSEOOT:'CLVAiION OA G£ FLOOR -= 902.0 PROPOSED J1IRECTION .SURFAEE' DRABVAGE MAIN .F/N/SH'FLOOR _ :9037 HOUSE = 5345 SF COH :CANTtEVERED `DVERHANG TOP 'OF FOUNDATION = 902.3(VARIFS) PODLAREA 7443 SF (N /C) r .a'DWEST 42,VOR =,Z92.0 L = 5345 S / 10.39 X3HL DVERNEAD if Ti Y .17NE .. .. TOTA F Y GFE ..._.ZARAGE`FJ DOR'.Aa"AnON TFE ` =:, TflP OF: FOUNDATION. ATION SE • ? LOWEST z F1 OR :aEVATION P� i __7 S9�/ 9' i P� 2 l0, W U) D O 2 0 Z F- I I r� M Z_ - W O g M I a� rn oto A Q z� Q Q Q) Q LEGAL DESCRIPTION ')' LOT 2, BLOCK 1, GUNNAR JOHNSON' S SECOND REARRANGEMENT ROLLING GREEN, Q HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN j I ADDRESS - 4603 ANNAWAY DRIVE m 'PI1� #29- 117 -21 -21 -0008 _ LbT AREA = 52140 SR 1 1 ll�J� �tE ' X 25% = 13035 $ `S'TRUCTURE, - HC ALLOWED , � SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PER_ - ` � � TITLE OR EASEMENT INFORMATION -'- � a :.sue VERIFY ALL SETBACKS WITH CITY N 2 l0, W U) D O 2 0 Z F- I I r� M Z_ - W O g M I a� rn oto A Q z� Q Q Q) Q Al IN ■■■s��'� Oil SMAPE FOOTAGE MAIN - 3586* UPPR 183I� FQL E- • TOTAL - - so GUEST SUITE - ens SPORT COURT . W" I i I I I I x I II II II II II II II II II II �r---- - - - - -- J� I I II II II II II II II II II II I II 11 II a1 jI 1L -- ----- °---- - - - --, FF II II II II II II II II II 11 II II I II II 11 II II II II II II II II II -� II II II II II II II II II II II IL------------- -- - L --------------- � II 11 11 11 11 II II 11 11 II Ir 11 II 11 II j� O O jl 11 II 11 II II II 11 II 11 II 11 II II II 1�----------- - - - - -- SOJlARE FOOTAGE MAIN - 3mo UPPER - 032* FAL • TOT Diu$ GUEST SUITE - 61T� SPORT cam -4109 � s1A rIORTArT: nE HxxBRACrDRSwu eERrSPOnsIa<e TGN rEE1LwNGTIHT sE rr3TS PRIORro waaccG9utT.'a+c.n ATDmDIN ro nE TIOTES sHOVMONTHEaR1INHTRAN THHrdHEHNYTE ADIMIONAL RAN& SPEC&I'AnOnsACBETJWS APPLICABLE ro TTQSTN161EGT. TE I d, y � P, C CONTRPCTORSHALREVEYINLL PPTAB'ABIE RENa AND ADOHESSI XWFl1GT5 ORLGUESYMHTHE PROJECT OYMERBREPRESENTATIVE -� -� -- F � N rREEEErNINGCONSTRUCTIQYMHRATIOTS T Rte10POPlM1GERAR.lPN05GPE YlEPLNtPLRtOB7CNNL 0ETAd5XEE15 EFG P THERE 6 ADLSCiFPANCY REGARWNG CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN MULTIPLE AGENCES,711E MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE FOLLOWED. I 1 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET e \ \ H C0.YGOISCNOWTAi'IXE SSSIn FA AilaHWpI ANM TE R0. T THE ELAN ESOOCEM-07R EDSTAIDARO GDEINES FOR TIE THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING clro �fi \ A�Rf/ATFca TRA�aK CWSUB=R XMMNLLO�RIETHEEXACTLiOC CA�°F�E)Vr VWMSBEFGNE \ COMMENCING WOW 9YCORTACT@IG THE NOTIFICATIOICENTEI(GO4ER STATEONEFOR MINNESOTA AT gO04252.114 THE •I.AROrBIfDC.® / � .�y.egy/ ���\�1 - -AW • FOR ACT° R/ GEES T R YNDWIO MIGHT BE 0CfA510NE0 STN®SQFECE BYHOORHBi FAIMToUACTTlAGTERD FFESSMARANDALL UTLMESBDERG0.M ANDOVBf/0T. 2 THIS EROSION CONTROL RAN REPRESENTS NMI IMUM SUGGESTED SITE CONTROLS THAT ARE RMURED FORTHL9 PROJECT. STAID I J3 0 CONTMCTORSHOULO USE THLR PLAN AND OTHER PLANS FOR REFERENCE AS TO ADDOR REPLACE ADDITIONAL SITE CONINOLSAS REGUNED TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF. THE GENERAL CONTRA TO RSHALL TAKE ALL PREcA Tgrvs NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRICTION FK SES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OCCURRING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 3 THE TTHESNIPP°P DFI)TO(PIAC A ALL REVISIONS AND DCHANGES TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN ANTI PLACE 4 THE CCNTRACTORSHOULDPROVIDE A STORMWATER POLLUTION PFEHENTION PLAN(SIVPPPi WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE I 1• - THIs DMWBNG (EROSION &CONTROL PLAN). THE STANDARD DETARATHE RAN NARRATIVE WE AND OWING PLANS, ATFACHPa3TTS WMUDED IN THE SRETWRKSPECB9CATIONS, PLUS ANDY COWMICRON RELATED PERMITS IA9. NPDES VICINITY MAP PERMIT, NUMDPAL EROSION CONTROL PERMIT. WATERSHED DISTRICT PETUMIT, INCLUDING ALL RULES, REOUIREWNTS AND .•.,• ` / nw,,, ! .\ SCALE NONE STANDARDS)AND ALLSUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ADDTON& DOCUMENTS e& DNEPECTIM LOGS. N \ / / WORK 5C14EWLES RELATED TO &REWORK AND EROSION CONTROL SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE SYRPPANO INCLUDED AS �• PAATOFSWPPPDOCUMENM 3 TFE SN/PPPA♦0 ALL OTHQi51IEWOHU ( EXCAVATING. GRADING OPERATIONS, ETC. REA rf'D. OOWfdENTS MUST BE1G:Pr AT THE SITE M RAIN VEWDUWNG CONSTRUCTION 1�b ! �• /� •" // &. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES(BMPSI AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 7HE CONTRACTOR BXAA OVERSEE TIE INSPECTION &MANTENACO COMPLETED IS APPROVED B ION AUTHORITIES, THE BEGINNING OF - , CONSTRUCTION AND UNTLCONSTRUCTTON IS COMPLt7ED.ISAPPROVED Frr AL AU7xawTffs TXE NGD O OF TERYIHATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE EPA BY IDEA THE OW ENOROPERATORAS APPROVED ON PfieWff. -- ' -. //I - ADDRONASRIPSSH'TLBEIMPLEMEMHID ASOGTATED BY CQNORIOLS AT ROADORONA. COST TIOWNEH THROUGHOUT PHASE 1 r_____�..'— — \ �, 7, E°� °� L� LET UG E HE �T„NGAGENN B ER A REFERTOTHE NPWS PEW AND MUNICIPALITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING NANDLINOff THE ' FOLLOWSNQ - SCUD WAM eg. COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT &CGNORETE M&LI[GS, FLOATING DEBRIS. PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, ' CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION DEBRIS OTHER WASTES HAZARDOUS MATEIAS:aS.OL GASOLINE. PAD4T A ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES TO PREVEM1TB5PLMLLEAKS OROTHERA OR OEGNMGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE GWSE£ONDAAY CONTAINMENT- TO fl PR LEE AND PWORM ANY SITEW'OWC THIS INCLUDES ROCK °NFNTRANCEA CONCRETE WASHING FACILITIES, AND A - - -- — - - -=�� I � . SrA1EDSLTFEAICL ; 'I. AROMIDOLICS I I I 60 `' EASE '2 SCALE IN FEET t ow'�AF'N'mEnDl Nanon¢mE�nrOlrEUs LDa� N4R�F, eaTa,l<aaaro.T,IQFDNN.I.N�,�,1�[ LLADIR ar FTNDe al TIE uRaLaFAlaznEFT�= RIDBATIFU. 4 GOOD 8419 wY BE PAS£D [P TO NFET iW0'.IDIII W'OEFBC .IVNDrEaTRnPEN1TAwHA aAalJrAmlBlraEA. F,*I- 0 - `1 Nn,F1T := r l® SERVICE AREAS. 41� 10. P TEMPCPJARY SEDIMENT BASICS ARE REWIRED OR PANNED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RECOMMEMEED TO CONSULT WITH THE ENGINEER TO T)BWSS BASN MEMATION AID FUNCIIOR RAM SHALLBE RWOPFAATIONABFFORE STIEWORH COMEW NCES. 11. DISTURBED PORTIONS M THE SRE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTMTYHAS STOPPED FOR APERIOD OF SEVEN DAYS OR ' MORE, OR HAS POTENTIAL TO ROBLI E SEDIMENT TO DOWNSTREAM AREAS SHOULD IECOVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPOES PERMIT FEOUREJENTSOR THE MUNICPALITYREQUIRENENT3 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FORDETERMAWG THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION FOR EXPOSED SOIL IN AREAS VOWS CONSTRUCTION �Q�mPM ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED. `\ 12 CONTRACTORS ORSVECCNISEDIMENT PACF0R9 WALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES S FROM \ H 4 TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT WINS. OPERATION OF SEDIMENT BASINS USED FORCONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACTYTO MEET NPDES AND MUNIWALREWNEMEMBATNOADDRIONALCOSTMThE01 :TER 13 Of4STEa OFF-SITE SOB. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SMALL BE PROJECTED FROM EROSION SEDIMENTATION \ THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OFSNPS. STOCKPILE AND BOWROWARE LGCAT°NS SMALL SENOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND Y PERMITTEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH NPOES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (AT A MINIMUM) INCLUDING OFF-WE AREAS AT No \.l'J r _ _ ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 14. TEMPORARYSOIL STOCKPILES SHOULD HAVE SLTFOMOROTHEREFFECTNESEDf /ENTaWrROLS&SHOULD NOTBE • PLACED N AREAS THAT CAN RUNOFFUNCONTROLLEDTO SURFACE WATERS. INCLUDING STORMWATEROONVEYANCES SUCH ASCURB& WTieiSYSTDNS OR CONDUITS& DTOM / s ii ADDITIONAL INLETPROTECTION MFJSUFES SHALL BE IN PLACE ON ALL INSTALLED INUE S UNTIL RNAL STABIL17ATIONS REACHEDAT NO ADDITION& COST TO THE OWNER INLETPROTEvTION DEVICES SHALLBE PROPERLY SECURED AS TO PREVENT MOVEJENTBY SEDIMENT OR WATER INLET PROTECTION WILL Be REWIRED AT ALLOOWM —AM CATCH BASINS BIFM ZW OF TIE PROJECT SITE CONTACTTHE CfTYOF EMIAON USE OFALLOWABLE CBINLET PROTECTION DEVICES V / 1& MEASURES STATE ONTMBEERSPECnONREWNE.EN19 / ALL AEASURS STALED ON THSEflO510N AND SEDWFM CONTROLPIAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ACOMINEfEO PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTILPOW CONDIIONS ARE SATISFIED FOR LEGEND PHASE QFWORKOR IN& STABIWATION OF THE SITE THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ONTHIS PLAN MUST ROUTDIELYINSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DUI@m ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ANDYIIHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN W INCHES IN 24 HOURS. THE DESIGNATED PERSON SHOULD BE FMMMVffH EXISTING PROPOSED \,. .. � PERMU. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HVEAIY ALL APPLICABLE BYPS ARE CONTANEDNAN INSPECTION LOG —THE CT / PROJE. AT AMYBWIM, THE LOG SHOULD MONITOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ALL SToRN DRAIN INLETS AND INLETS IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT LOCATION. ALL SEEDED ME0.9 s m -J N.�.R SLTNR�S rs • /' • VEHICLE TRACKING M SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE o®oae• ucca mm [Ra THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREAS OUTLET STRUCTURES N THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEONENTATION BAS INS 'ma .— oma mia �---+- .swacNm[ • SOURCES OF ESOL9 T Xmsw X ® WASHING AND CON STRU CTION VEHICLE SERVICE FAC ME mom - aNmncmn Ram Pa ros MTxa+ _ wRrTEaTTRFA1mR1A0.1CJ "`6fOmIWaB±N 'V. M1001•T� -_- ..QpNOM1FA9Q1�Re: z2Afa t �yaOLNT�2EpR WOdFD Q - llAe®RORt2i '�P •..ra ®srAeETTaI . .- aeutmmrlyF •� ..yP4 NOTE!k .9Ir4W101 - T�LRLTDLWN� J -. Po/RTFAUISITE NeGILIXI FF>�T,aorgaFWOmLTasmlRmn�NTY. rFHI. TEaFJ�a1eL> EnA ®1RagRmeMmseemDeanowa'Iwm4raaL - F.TZITwmrf NuGFFEeHaYTUmTET;mf FaT7uRE'a3+c>EnmFrA9wrR RaoO m+msens - Sla EROSION CON DETAIL '-' MONSTRUMMM ASS PAD n -T A AnrL 'F . A 1 — —,s A rn^E- .;F�____= .c�r�.r :uY.r: -A JiMw'6lsa M: n1A: Ylza:w,.rat..�'.'9UJ1JLV.at•'Mr SUPPLEMENTAL ESC AND STORMWATER NOTES: L ELEVATION AND DATUM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP. 2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ACCESS FOR ANY WORK EXTENDING BEYOND THE 'FEMAFLOODPLAIN INFORMATION PROPERTYBOUNDARY. SOURCE DATUeA xOm 3. DUE TO THE PROPERTY REPLACING AN EXISTING OWEI.LNG. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTES WERE p�fp@7DxYFAflFiDmeEYATIDaI - .. ®O IDFWIVW=7LOMN(W$()OTPI NGVD ENTIRELOTOUTOFFEMWF10ODPWN NOTANALYZED. NEW STRUCTURE GENERALLY FOLLOWS EJOSTNG OPENING ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED '- :PIDPDSE➢IfD1f64 &R00013EVATON "SEW vvuaiMRRMIYLT/12(PERMNDNR) NAVD NmomaALASOF712D34 CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT ALTER EXISTING SIDE LOT DRAINAGE PATTERNS WITHIN EASEMENT AND . ";P90PO5CNPA?a&wcw2m2PADMRRM 'a CF SURVEYED PROPEATYANDSIDRM PLAN NAVD ASSUM1ESa1'OF DEATH ACROSS FOOTPRINT SETBACK AREAS. •.;,:.. FRDPDEED1rBma 'avNauu�TVCmJammMFDa+. ^ elf .-- M)PEYEOPROPDmANDnDRMPLAN NAVD ASSUMES 0.1'OF DEPTH ACROSS FOOTPRINT 4. IF RESTORATION NFORMATON NOT SPECIFIED BY OWNER, GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN - 14 DAYS USING &ROOT SEED MIX 250 OR COVERED USING WOOD FIBER BLAWET OR MULCH. USE OF ' - STRAWISNOTALLOWED. 5. ALL STOCAMES INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OUTSIDE ANY SLTFENCE LOCATION. B, CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL 41NAL STABILIZATION' 7. PROPOSED CONTOUR GRACES BASED ON SUPPLIED BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY OTHERS. 8. SILT FENCE PLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO FENCES PROVIDE 1FT MN SETBACK 9. WHEN VEHICLE ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED, ORANGE CONSTRUCTION PENCE SHOULD eE RACED OVER ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY LOCATION& ti1[DR RFC.xo'NC ITT IF INN wwmm: LNIe»RPN hn I ;m mnWwxpn man.wmNAsc+[n �nlA le W de CteMe N[peehn zM VeYlmlm [m4ez rtN ua bIa>aptltlwRl, W Y,Itli.M'IYmY WwNO' zM'WSY YRMN• biN[mvlm, •ppwn In 4vamnn Yaklbd, Iv Aq[c o.,., mnmlmm mwAm> Ma wnF[,>.� m MtlnNUY, eRmr, wa nda namb. Nln.ro m mF.[.>, mm. .ne •mmiprm maaW Pmve.arn PPravpmMamRnaDNfa p�awntlan N as emmun[ gaNV mr zn0 >II LHn16 PAR Ievn4unYZ>. er dd Pr[ nYv ,znmzb4vm[wrNNn, FN4N Nnm tiv uN N ep� n zwzbuaa>n epvpwnR ft.. w ,mW,Re, n ecmmx m Apes bm Mariner Professional Services F„y.em Nn.+N.'a o WP n..c ,r,R en4mc.. 2035 Fakva A>TPR[eS P SIZ.2162579 PaSarBa, MN 55113 F 651.210.7775 P vn w w..-.. w..a.,�nfa�maA[ur- Pa.cam SHEET SET INDEX T. ESC AND STORMWATER PLAN Engineer CarltaLt Adam Parker BdamP'�jBErdfler -ps.wRl 651218.70`5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE 1 TYPED OR NAME ADAM T. PARKER DATE 7117N4 REG. NO. 42733 IIIIIIIIII' III_ &III' IIIIIIIIII' Z 15 CL W GM cr- O 0 Z Q O llee- O v 0 r_ O � M z 6F` oW CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DWENBIOLS Oil THE WORK Alm REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY TO ME CONSULTANT BEFORE PROMEDINO, ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNERArm MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE VAOOO 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN C) X W CIJENT: QJ Abrader Design C -Lip z 1 401 Laks Steal Ees[ o d' Wayzata, MN 55391 w !� OU473.OM a wr Asx;nderdedBc p.— a DRAWN CHECKED ATP PLAN APPROVED WORN NST'ECTED 717114 r WORK VERIFIED CAD FILE \ z O q PLAN AN DATE IF BM < [ INRI PLAN FRFDUCED SCALE 5/20114 O OHEO(RENBION FM UPDATE GEIERALEF43SM CONTROL NOTE& rIORTArT: nE HxxBRACrDRSwu eERrSPOnsIa<e TGN rEE1LwNGTIHT sE rr3TS PRIORro waaccG9utT.'a+c.n ATDmDIN ro nE TIOTES sHOVMONTHEaR1INHTRAN THHrdHEHNYTE ADIMIONAL RAN& SPEC&I'AnOnsACBETJWS APPLICABLE ro TTQSTN161EGT. TE I d, y � P, C CONTRPCTORSHALREVEYINLL PPTAB'ABIE RENa AND ADOHESSI XWFl1GT5 ORLGUESYMHTHE PROJECT OYMERBREPRESENTATIVE -� -� -- F � N rREEEErNINGCONSTRUCTIQYMHRATIOTS T Rte10POPlM1GERAR.lPN05GPE YlEPLNtPLRtOB7CNNL 0ETAd5XEE15 EFG P THERE 6 ADLSCiFPANCY REGARWNG CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN MULTIPLE AGENCES,711E MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE FOLLOWED. I I. e clro �fi \ A�Rf/ATFca TRA�aK CWSUB=R XMMNLLO�RIETHEEXACTLiOC CA�°F�E)Vr VWMSBEFGNE \ COMMENCING WOW 9YCORTACT@IG THE NOTIFICATIOICENTEI(GO4ER STATEONEFOR MINNESOTA AT gO04252.114 THE •I.AROrBIfDC.® / � .�y.egy/ ���\�1 - -AW • FOR ACT° R/ GEES T R YNDWIO MIGHT BE 0CfA510NE0 STN®SQFECE BYHOORHBi FAIMToUACTTlAGTERD FFESSMARANDALL UTLMESBDERG0.M ANDOVBf/0T. 2 THIS EROSION CONTROL RAN REPRESENTS NMI IMUM SUGGESTED SITE CONTROLS THAT ARE RMURED FORTHL9 PROJECT. STAID I J3 0 CONTMCTORSHOULO USE THLR PLAN AND OTHER PLANS FOR REFERENCE AS TO ADDOR REPLACE ADDITIONAL SITE CONINOLSAS REGUNED TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF. THE GENERAL CONTRA TO RSHALL TAKE ALL PREcA Tgrvs NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRICTION FK SES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OCCURRING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 3 THE TTHESNIPP°P DFI)TO(PIAC A ALL REVISIONS AND DCHANGES TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN ANTI PLACE 4 THE CCNTRACTORSHOULDPROVIDE A STORMWATER POLLUTION PFEHENTION PLAN(SIVPPPi WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE I 1• - THIs DMWBNG (EROSION &CONTROL PLAN). THE STANDARD DETARATHE RAN NARRATIVE WE AND OWING PLANS, ATFACHPa3TTS WMUDED IN THE SRETWRKSPECB9CATIONS, PLUS ANDY COWMICRON RELATED PERMITS IA9. NPDES VICINITY MAP PERMIT, NUMDPAL EROSION CONTROL PERMIT. WATERSHED DISTRICT PETUMIT, INCLUDING ALL RULES, REOUIREWNTS AND .•.,• ` / nw,,, ! .\ SCALE NONE STANDARDS)AND ALLSUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ADDTON& DOCUMENTS e& DNEPECTIM LOGS. N \ / / WORK 5C14EWLES RELATED TO &REWORK AND EROSION CONTROL SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE SYRPPANO INCLUDED AS �• PAATOFSWPPPDOCUMENM 3 TFE SN/PPPA♦0 ALL OTHQi51IEWOHU ( EXCAVATING. GRADING OPERATIONS, ETC. REA rf'D. OOWfdENTS MUST BE1G:Pr AT THE SITE M RAIN VEWDUWNG CONSTRUCTION 1�b ! �• /� •" // &. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES(BMPSI AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 7HE CONTRACTOR BXAA OVERSEE TIE INSPECTION &MANTENACO COMPLETED IS APPROVED B ION AUTHORITIES, THE BEGINNING OF - , CONSTRUCTION AND UNTLCONSTRUCTTON IS COMPLt7ED.ISAPPROVED Frr AL AU7xawTffs TXE NGD O OF TERYIHATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE EPA BY IDEA THE OW ENOROPERATORAS APPROVED ON PfieWff. -- ' -. //I - ADDRONASRIPSSH'TLBEIMPLEMEMHID ASOGTATED BY CQNORIOLS AT ROADORONA. COST TIOWNEH THROUGHOUT PHASE 1 r_____�..'— — \ �, 7, E°� °� L� LET UG E HE �T„NGAGENN B ER A REFERTOTHE NPWS PEW AND MUNICIPALITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING NANDLINOff THE ' FOLLOWSNQ - SCUD WAM eg. COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT &CGNORETE M&LI[GS, FLOATING DEBRIS. PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, ' CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION DEBRIS OTHER WASTES HAZARDOUS MATEIAS:aS.OL GASOLINE. PAD4T A ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES TO PREVEM1TB5PLMLLEAKS OROTHERA OR OEGNMGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE GWSE£ONDAAY CONTAINMENT- TO fl PR LEE AND PWORM ANY SITEW'OWC THIS INCLUDES ROCK °NFNTRANCEA CONCRETE WASHING FACILITIES, AND A - - -- — - - -=�� I � . SrA1EDSLTFEAICL ; 'I. AROMIDOLICS I I I 60 `' EASE '2 SCALE IN FEET t ow'�AF'N'mEnDl Nanon¢mE�nrOlrEUs LDa� N4R�F, eaTa,l<aaaro.T,IQFDNN.I.N�,�,1�[ LLADIR ar FTNDe al TIE uRaLaFAlaznEFT�= RIDBATIFU. 4 GOOD 8419 wY BE PAS£D [P TO NFET iW0'.IDIII W'OEFBC .IVNDrEaTRnPEN1TAwHA aAalJrAmlBlraEA. F,*I- 0 - `1 Nn,F1T := r l® SERVICE AREAS. 41� 10. P TEMPCPJARY SEDIMENT BASICS ARE REWIRED OR PANNED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RECOMMEMEED TO CONSULT WITH THE ENGINEER TO T)BWSS BASN MEMATION AID FUNCIIOR RAM SHALLBE RWOPFAATIONABFFORE STIEWORH COMEW NCES. 11. DISTURBED PORTIONS M THE SRE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTMTYHAS STOPPED FOR APERIOD OF SEVEN DAYS OR ' MORE, OR HAS POTENTIAL TO ROBLI E SEDIMENT TO DOWNSTREAM AREAS SHOULD IECOVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPOES PERMIT FEOUREJENTSOR THE MUNICPALITYREQUIRENENT3 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FORDETERMAWG THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION FOR EXPOSED SOIL IN AREAS VOWS CONSTRUCTION �Q�mPM ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED. `\ 12 CONTRACTORS ORSVECCNISEDIMENT PACF0R9 WALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES S FROM \ H 4 TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT WINS. OPERATION OF SEDIMENT BASINS USED FORCONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACTYTO MEET NPDES AND MUNIWALREWNEMEMBATNOADDRIONALCOSTMThE01 :TER 13 Of4STEa OFF-SITE SOB. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SMALL BE PROJECTED FROM EROSION SEDIMENTATION \ THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OFSNPS. STOCKPILE AND BOWROWARE LGCAT°NS SMALL SENOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND Y PERMITTEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH NPOES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (AT A MINIMUM) INCLUDING OFF-WE AREAS AT No \.l'J r _ _ ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 14. TEMPORARYSOIL STOCKPILES SHOULD HAVE SLTFOMOROTHEREFFECTNESEDf /ENTaWrROLS&SHOULD NOTBE • PLACED N AREAS THAT CAN RUNOFFUNCONTROLLEDTO SURFACE WATERS. INCLUDING STORMWATEROONVEYANCES SUCH ASCURB& WTieiSYSTDNS OR CONDUITS& DTOM / s ii ADDITIONAL INLETPROTECTION MFJSUFES SHALL BE IN PLACE ON ALL INSTALLED INUE S UNTIL RNAL STABIL17ATIONS REACHEDAT NO ADDITION& COST TO THE OWNER INLETPROTEvTION DEVICES SHALLBE PROPERLY SECURED AS TO PREVENT MOVEJENTBY SEDIMENT OR WATER INLET PROTECTION WILL Be REWIRED AT ALLOOWM —AM CATCH BASINS BIFM ZW OF TIE PROJECT SITE CONTACTTHE CfTYOF EMIAON USE OFALLOWABLE CBINLET PROTECTION DEVICES V / 1& MEASURES STATE ONTMBEERSPECnONREWNE.EN19 / ALL AEASURS STALED ON THSEflO510N AND SEDWFM CONTROLPIAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ACOMINEfEO PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTILPOW CONDIIONS ARE SATISFIED FOR LEGEND PHASE QFWORKOR IN& STABIWATION OF THE SITE THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ONTHIS PLAN MUST ROUTDIELYINSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DUI@m ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ANDYIIHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN W INCHES IN 24 HOURS. THE DESIGNATED PERSON SHOULD BE FMMMVffH EXISTING PROPOSED \,. .. � PERMU. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HVEAIY ALL APPLICABLE BYPS ARE CONTANEDNAN INSPECTION LOG —THE CT / PROJE. AT AMYBWIM, THE LOG SHOULD MONITOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ALL SToRN DRAIN INLETS AND INLETS IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT LOCATION. ALL SEEDED ME0.9 s m -J N.�.R SLTNR�S rs • /' • VEHICLE TRACKING M SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE o®oae• ucca mm [Ra THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREAS OUTLET STRUCTURES N THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEONENTATION BAS INS 'ma .— oma mia �---+- .swacNm[ • SOURCES OF ESOL9 T Xmsw X ® WASHING AND CON STRU CTION VEHICLE SERVICE FAC ME mom - aNmncmn Ram Pa ros MTxa+ _ wRrTEaTTRFA1mR1A0.1CJ "`6fOmIWaB±N 'V. M1001•T� -_- ..QpNOM1FA9Q1�Re: z2Afa t �yaOLNT�2EpR WOdFD Q - llAe®RORt2i '�P •..ra ®srAeETTaI . .- aeutmmrlyF •� ..yP4 NOTE!k .9Ir4W101 - T�LRLTDLWN� J -. Po/RTFAUISITE NeGILIXI FF>�T,aorgaFWOmLTasmlRmn�NTY. rFHI. TEaFJ�a1eL> EnA ®1RagRmeMmseemDeanowa'Iwm4raaL - F.TZITwmrf NuGFFEeHaYTUmTET;mf FaT7uRE'a3+c>EnmFrA9wrR RaoO m+msens - Sla EROSION CON DETAIL '-' MONSTRUMMM ASS PAD n -T A AnrL 'F . A 1 — —,s A rn^E- .;F�____= .c�r�.r :uY.r: -A JiMw'6lsa M: n1A: Ylza:w,.rat..�'.'9UJ1JLV.at•'Mr SUPPLEMENTAL ESC AND STORMWATER NOTES: L ELEVATION AND DATUM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP. 2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ACCESS FOR ANY WORK EXTENDING BEYOND THE 'FEMAFLOODPLAIN INFORMATION PROPERTYBOUNDARY. SOURCE DATUeA xOm 3. DUE TO THE PROPERTY REPLACING AN EXISTING OWEI.LNG. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTES WERE p�fp@7DxYFAflFiDmeEYATIDaI - .. ®O IDFWIVW=7LOMN(W$()OTPI NGVD ENTIRELOTOUTOFFEMWF10ODPWN NOTANALYZED. NEW STRUCTURE GENERALLY FOLLOWS EJOSTNG OPENING ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED '- :PIDPDSE➢IfD1f64 &R00013EVATON "SEW vvuaiMRRMIYLT/12(PERMNDNR) NAVD NmomaALASOF712D34 CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT ALTER EXISTING SIDE LOT DRAINAGE PATTERNS WITHIN EASEMENT AND . ";P90PO5CNPA?a&wcw2m2PADMRRM 'a CF SURVEYED PROPEATYANDSIDRM PLAN NAVD ASSUM1ESa1'OF DEATH ACROSS FOOTPRINT SETBACK AREAS. •.;,:.. FRDPDEED1rBma 'avNauu�TVCmJammMFDa+. ^ elf .-- M)PEYEOPROPDmANDnDRMPLAN NAVD ASSUMES 0.1'OF DEPTH ACROSS FOOTPRINT 4. IF RESTORATION NFORMATON NOT SPECIFIED BY OWNER, GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN - 14 DAYS USING &ROOT SEED MIX 250 OR COVERED USING WOOD FIBER BLAWET OR MULCH. USE OF ' - STRAWISNOTALLOWED. 5. ALL STOCAMES INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OUTSIDE ANY SLTFENCE LOCATION. B, CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL 41NAL STABILIZATION' 7. PROPOSED CONTOUR GRACES BASED ON SUPPLIED BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY OTHERS. 8. SILT FENCE PLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO FENCES PROVIDE 1FT MN SETBACK 9. WHEN VEHICLE ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED, ORANGE CONSTRUCTION PENCE SHOULD eE RACED OVER ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY LOCATION& ti1[DR RFC.xo'NC ITT IF INN wwmm: LNIe»RPN hn I ;m mnWwxpn man.wmNAsc+[n �nlA le W de CteMe N[peehn zM VeYlmlm [m4ez rtN ua bIa>aptltlwRl, W Y,Itli.M'IYmY WwNO' zM'WSY YRMN• biN[mvlm, •ppwn In 4vamnn Yaklbd, Iv Aq[c o.,., mnmlmm mwAm> Ma wnF[,>.� m MtlnNUY, eRmr, wa nda namb. Nln.ro m mF.[.>, mm. .ne •mmiprm maaW Pmve.arn PPravpmMamRnaDNfa p�awntlan N as emmun[ gaNV mr zn0 >II LHn16 PAR Ievn4unYZ>. er dd Pr[ nYv ,znmzb4vm[wrNNn, FN4N Nnm tiv uN N ep� n zwzbuaa>n epvpwnR ft.. w ,mW,Re, n ecmmx m Apes bm Mariner Professional Services F„y.em Nn.+N.'a o WP n..c ,r,R en4mc.. 2035 Fakva A>TPR[eS P SIZ.2162579 PaSarBa, MN 55113 F 651.210.7775 P vn w w..-.. w..a.,�nfa�maA[ur- Pa.cam SHEET SET INDEX T. ESC AND STORMWATER PLAN Engineer CarltaLt Adam Parker BdamP'�jBErdfler -ps.wRl 651218.70`5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE 1 TYPED OR NAME ADAM T. PARKER DATE 7117N4 REG. NO. 42733 IIIIIIIIII' III_ &III' IIIIIIIIII' Z 15 CL W GM cr- O 0 Z Q O llee- O v 0 r_ O � M z 6F` oW CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DWENBIOLS Oil THE WORK Alm REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY TO ME CONSULTANT BEFORE PROMEDINO, ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNERArm MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE VAOOO 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN C) X W CIJENT: QJ Abrader Design C -Lip z 1 401 Laks Steal Ees[ o d' Wayzata, MN 55391 w !� OU473.OM a wr Asx;nderdedBc p.— a DRAWN CHECKED ATP PLAN APPROVED WORN NST'ECTED 717114 r WORK VERIFIED CAD FILE \ z O q PLAN AN DATE IF BM < [ INRI PLAN FRFDUCED SCALE 5/20114 O OHEO(RENBION FM UPDATE DEMOLITION DEBRIS OTHER WASTES HAZARDOUS MATEIAS:aS.OL GASOLINE. PAD4T A ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES TO PREVEM1TB5PLMLLEAKS OROTHERA OR OEGNMGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE GWSE£ONDAAY CONTAINMENT- TO fl PR LEE AND PWORM ANY SITEW'OWC THIS INCLUDES ROCK °NFNTRANCEA CONCRETE WASHING FACILITIES, AND A - - -- — - - -=�� I � . SrA1EDSLTFEAICL ; 'I. AROMIDOLICS I I I 60 `' EASE '2 SCALE IN FEET t ow'�AF'N'mEnDl Nanon¢mE�nrOlrEUs LDa� N4R�F, eaTa,l<aaaro.T,IQFDNN.I.N�,�,1�[ LLADIR ar FTNDe al TIE uRaLaFAlaznEFT�= RIDBATIFU. 4 GOOD 8419 wY BE PAS£D [P TO NFET iW0'.IDIII W'OEFBC .IVNDrEaTRnPEN1TAwHA aAalJrAmlBlraEA. F,*I- 0 - `1 Nn,F1T := r l® SERVICE AREAS. 41� 10. P TEMPCPJARY SEDIMENT BASICS ARE REWIRED OR PANNED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RECOMMEMEED TO CONSULT WITH THE ENGINEER TO T)BWSS BASN MEMATION AID FUNCIIOR RAM SHALLBE RWOPFAATIONABFFORE STIEWORH COMEW NCES. 11. DISTURBED PORTIONS M THE SRE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTMTYHAS STOPPED FOR APERIOD OF SEVEN DAYS OR ' MORE, OR HAS POTENTIAL TO ROBLI E SEDIMENT TO DOWNSTREAM AREAS SHOULD IECOVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPOES PERMIT FEOUREJENTSOR THE MUNICPALITYREQUIRENENT3 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FORDETERMAWG THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION FOR EXPOSED SOIL IN AREAS VOWS CONSTRUCTION �Q�mPM ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED. `\ 12 CONTRACTORS ORSVECCNISEDIMENT PACF0R9 WALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES S FROM \ H 4 TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT WINS. OPERATION OF SEDIMENT BASINS USED FORCONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACTYTO MEET NPDES AND MUNIWALREWNEMEMBATNOADDRIONALCOSTMThE01 :TER 13 Of4STEa OFF-SITE SOB. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SMALL BE PROJECTED FROM EROSION SEDIMENTATION \ THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OFSNPS. STOCKPILE AND BOWROWARE LGCAT°NS SMALL SENOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND Y PERMITTEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH NPOES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (AT A MINIMUM) INCLUDING OFF-WE AREAS AT No \.l'J r _ _ ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 14. TEMPORARYSOIL STOCKPILES SHOULD HAVE SLTFOMOROTHEREFFECTNESEDf /ENTaWrROLS&SHOULD NOTBE • PLACED N AREAS THAT CAN RUNOFFUNCONTROLLEDTO SURFACE WATERS. INCLUDING STORMWATEROONVEYANCES SUCH ASCURB& WTieiSYSTDNS OR CONDUITS& DTOM / s ii ADDITIONAL INLETPROTECTION MFJSUFES SHALL BE IN PLACE ON ALL INSTALLED INUE S UNTIL RNAL STABIL17ATIONS REACHEDAT NO ADDITION& COST TO THE OWNER INLETPROTEvTION DEVICES SHALLBE PROPERLY SECURED AS TO PREVENT MOVEJENTBY SEDIMENT OR WATER INLET PROTECTION WILL Be REWIRED AT ALLOOWM —AM CATCH BASINS BIFM ZW OF TIE PROJECT SITE CONTACTTHE CfTYOF EMIAON USE OFALLOWABLE CBINLET PROTECTION DEVICES V / 1& MEASURES STATE ONTMBEERSPECnONREWNE.EN19 / ALL AEASURS STALED ON THSEflO510N AND SEDWFM CONTROLPIAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ACOMINEfEO PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTILPOW CONDIIONS ARE SATISFIED FOR LEGEND PHASE QFWORKOR IN& STABIWATION OF THE SITE THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ONTHIS PLAN MUST ROUTDIELYINSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DUI@m ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ANDYIIHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN W INCHES IN 24 HOURS. THE DESIGNATED PERSON SHOULD BE FMMMVffH EXISTING PROPOSED \,. .. � PERMU. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HVEAIY ALL APPLICABLE BYPS ARE CONTANEDNAN INSPECTION LOG —THE CT / PROJE. AT AMYBWIM, THE LOG SHOULD MONITOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ALL SToRN DRAIN INLETS AND INLETS IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT LOCATION. ALL SEEDED ME0.9 s m -J N.�.R SLTNR�S rs • /' • VEHICLE TRACKING M SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE o®oae• ucca mm [Ra THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREAS OUTLET STRUCTURES N THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEONENTATION BAS INS 'ma .— oma mia �---+- .swacNm[ • SOURCES OF ESOL9 T Xmsw X ® WASHING AND CON STRU CTION VEHICLE SERVICE FAC ME mom - aNmncmn Ram Pa ros MTxa+ _ wRrTEaTTRFA1mR1A0.1CJ "`6fOmIWaB±N 'V. M1001•T� -_- ..QpNOM1FA9Q1�Re: z2Afa t �yaOLNT�2EpR WOdFD Q - llAe®RORt2i '�P •..ra ®srAeETTaI . .- aeutmmrlyF •� ..yP4 NOTE!k .9Ir4W101 - T�LRLTDLWN� J -. Po/RTFAUISITE NeGILIXI FF>�T,aorgaFWOmLTasmlRmn�NTY. rFHI. TEaFJ�a1eL> EnA ®1RagRmeMmseemDeanowa'Iwm4raaL - F.TZITwmrf NuGFFEeHaYTUmTET;mf FaT7uRE'a3+c>EnmFrA9wrR RaoO m+msens - Sla EROSION CON DETAIL '-' MONSTRUMMM ASS PAD n -T A AnrL 'F . A 1 — —,s A rn^E- .;F�____= .c�r�.r :uY.r: -A JiMw'6lsa M: n1A: Ylza:w,.rat..�'.'9UJ1JLV.at•'Mr SUPPLEMENTAL ESC AND STORMWATER NOTES: L ELEVATION AND DATUM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP. 2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ACCESS FOR ANY WORK EXTENDING BEYOND THE 'FEMAFLOODPLAIN INFORMATION PROPERTYBOUNDARY. SOURCE DATUeA xOm 3. DUE TO THE PROPERTY REPLACING AN EXISTING OWEI.LNG. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTES WERE p�fp@7DxYFAflFiDmeEYATIDaI - .. ®O IDFWIVW=7LOMN(W$()OTPI NGVD ENTIRELOTOUTOFFEMWF10ODPWN NOTANALYZED. NEW STRUCTURE GENERALLY FOLLOWS EJOSTNG OPENING ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED '- :PIDPDSE➢IfD1f64 &R00013EVATON "SEW vvuaiMRRMIYLT/12(PERMNDNR) NAVD NmomaALASOF712D34 CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT ALTER EXISTING SIDE LOT DRAINAGE PATTERNS WITHIN EASEMENT AND . ";P90PO5CNPA?a&wcw2m2PADMRRM 'a CF SURVEYED PROPEATYANDSIDRM PLAN NAVD ASSUM1ESa1'OF DEATH ACROSS FOOTPRINT SETBACK AREAS. •.;,:.. FRDPDEED1rBma 'avNauu�TVCmJammMFDa+. ^ elf .-- M)PEYEOPROPDmANDnDRMPLAN NAVD ASSUMES 0.1'OF DEPTH ACROSS FOOTPRINT 4. IF RESTORATION NFORMATON NOT SPECIFIED BY OWNER, GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN - 14 DAYS USING &ROOT SEED MIX 250 OR COVERED USING WOOD FIBER BLAWET OR MULCH. USE OF ' - STRAWISNOTALLOWED. 5. ALL STOCAMES INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OUTSIDE ANY SLTFENCE LOCATION. B, CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL 41NAL STABILIZATION' 7. PROPOSED CONTOUR GRACES BASED ON SUPPLIED BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY OTHERS. 8. SILT FENCE PLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO FENCES PROVIDE 1FT MN SETBACK 9. WHEN VEHICLE ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED, ORANGE CONSTRUCTION PENCE SHOULD eE RACED OVER ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY LOCATION& ti1[DR RFC.xo'NC ITT IF INN wwmm: LNIe»RPN hn I ;m mnWwxpn man.wmNAsc+[n �nlA le W de CteMe N[peehn zM VeYlmlm [m4ez rtN ua bIa>aptltlwRl, W Y,Itli.M'IYmY WwNO' zM'WSY YRMN• biN[mvlm, •ppwn In 4vamnn Yaklbd, Iv Aq[c o.,., mnmlmm mwAm> Ma wnF[,>.� m MtlnNUY, eRmr, wa nda namb. Nln.ro m mF.[.>, mm. .ne •mmiprm maaW Pmve.arn PPravpmMamRnaDNfa p�awntlan N as emmun[ gaNV mr zn0 >II LHn16 PAR Ievn4unYZ>. er dd Pr[ nYv ,znmzb4vm[wrNNn, FN4N Nnm tiv uN N ep� n zwzbuaa>n epvpwnR ft.. w ,mW,Re, n ecmmx m Apes bm Mariner Professional Services F„y.em Nn.+N.'a o WP n..c ,r,R en4mc.. 2035 Fakva A>TPR[eS P SIZ.2162579 PaSarBa, MN 55113 F 651.210.7775 P vn w w..-.. w..a.,�nfa�maA[ur- Pa.cam SHEET SET INDEX T. ESC AND STORMWATER PLAN Engineer CarltaLt Adam Parker BdamP'�jBErdfler -ps.wRl 651218.70`5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE 1 TYPED OR NAME ADAM T. PARKER DATE 7117N4 REG. NO. 42733 IIIIIIIIII' III_ &III' IIIIIIIIII' Z 15 CL W GM cr- O 0 Z Q O llee- O v 0 r_ O � M z 6F` oW CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DWENBIOLS Oil THE WORK Alm REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY TO ME CONSULTANT BEFORE PROMEDINO, ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNERArm MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE VAOOO 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN C) X W CIJENT: QJ Abrader Design C -Lip z 1 401 Laks Steal Ees[ o d' Wayzata, MN 55391 w !� OU473.OM a wr Asx;nderdedBc p.— a DRAWN CHECKED ATP PLAN APPROVED WORN NST'ECTED 717114 r WORK VERIFIED CAD FILE \ z O q PLAN AN DATE IF BM < [ INRI PLAN FRFDUCED SCALE 5/20114 O OHEO(RENBION FM UPDATE 14. TEMPORARYSOIL STOCKPILES SHOULD HAVE SLTFOMOROTHEREFFECTNESEDf /ENTaWrROLS&SHOULD NOTBE • PLACED N AREAS THAT CAN RUNOFFUNCONTROLLEDTO SURFACE WATERS. INCLUDING STORMWATEROONVEYANCES SUCH ASCURB& WTieiSYSTDNS OR CONDUITS& DTOM / s ii ADDITIONAL INLETPROTECTION MFJSUFES SHALL BE IN PLACE ON ALL INSTALLED INUE S UNTIL RNAL STABIL17ATIONS REACHEDAT NO ADDITION& COST TO THE OWNER INLETPROTEvTION DEVICES SHALLBE PROPERLY SECURED AS TO PREVENT MOVEJENTBY SEDIMENT OR WATER INLET PROTECTION WILL Be REWIRED AT ALLOOWM —AM CATCH BASINS BIFM ZW OF TIE PROJECT SITE CONTACTTHE CfTYOF EMIAON USE OFALLOWABLE CBINLET PROTECTION DEVICES V / 1& MEASURES STATE ONTMBEERSPECnONREWNE.EN19 / ALL AEASURS STALED ON THSEflO510N AND SEDWFM CONTROLPIAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ACOMINEfEO PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTILPOW CONDIIONS ARE SATISFIED FOR LEGEND PHASE QFWORKOR IN& STABIWATION OF THE SITE THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ONTHIS PLAN MUST ROUTDIELYINSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DUI@m ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION ANDYIIHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN W INCHES IN 24 HOURS. THE DESIGNATED PERSON SHOULD BE FMMMVffH EXISTING PROPOSED \,. .. � PERMU. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HVEAIY ALL APPLICABLE BYPS ARE CONTANEDNAN INSPECTION LOG —THE CT / PROJE. AT AMYBWIM, THE LOG SHOULD MONITOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ALL SToRN DRAIN INLETS AND INLETS IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT LOCATION. ALL SEEDED ME0.9 s m -J N.�.R SLTNR�S rs • /' • VEHICLE TRACKING M SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE o®oae• ucca mm [Ra THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREAS OUTLET STRUCTURES N THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEONENTATION BAS INS 'ma .— oma mia �---+- .swacNm[ • SOURCES OF ESOL9 T Xmsw X ® WASHING AND CON STRU CTION VEHICLE SERVICE FAC ME mom - aNmncmn Ram Pa ros MTxa+ _ wRrTEaTTRFA1mR1A0.1CJ "`6fOmIWaB±N 'V. M1001•T� -_- ..QpNOM1FA9Q1�Re: z2Afa t �yaOLNT�2EpR WOdFD Q - llAe®RORt2i '�P •..ra ®srAeETTaI . .- aeutmmrlyF •� ..yP4 NOTE!k .9Ir4W101 - T�LRLTDLWN� J -. Po/RTFAUISITE NeGILIXI FF>�T,aorgaFWOmLTasmlRmn�NTY. rFHI. TEaFJ�a1eL> EnA ®1RagRmeMmseemDeanowa'Iwm4raaL - F.TZITwmrf NuGFFEeHaYTUmTET;mf FaT7uRE'a3+c>EnmFrA9wrR RaoO m+msens - Sla EROSION CON DETAIL '-' MONSTRUMMM ASS PAD n -T A AnrL 'F . A 1 — —,s A rn^E- .;F�____= .c�r�.r :uY.r: -A JiMw'6lsa M: n1A: Ylza:w,.rat..�'.'9UJ1JLV.at•'Mr SUPPLEMENTAL ESC AND STORMWATER NOTES: L ELEVATION AND DATUM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP. 2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ACCESS FOR ANY WORK EXTENDING BEYOND THE 'FEMAFLOODPLAIN INFORMATION PROPERTYBOUNDARY. SOURCE DATUeA xOm 3. DUE TO THE PROPERTY REPLACING AN EXISTING OWEI.LNG. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTES WERE p�fp@7DxYFAflFiDmeEYATIDaI - .. ®O IDFWIVW=7LOMN(W$()OTPI NGVD ENTIRELOTOUTOFFEMWF10ODPWN NOTANALYZED. NEW STRUCTURE GENERALLY FOLLOWS EJOSTNG OPENING ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED '- :PIDPDSE➢IfD1f64 &R00013EVATON "SEW vvuaiMRRMIYLT/12(PERMNDNR) NAVD NmomaALASOF712D34 CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT ALTER EXISTING SIDE LOT DRAINAGE PATTERNS WITHIN EASEMENT AND . ";P90PO5CNPA?a&wcw2m2PADMRRM 'a CF SURVEYED PROPEATYANDSIDRM PLAN NAVD ASSUM1ESa1'OF DEATH ACROSS FOOTPRINT SETBACK AREAS. •.;,:.. FRDPDEED1rBma 'avNauu�TVCmJammMFDa+. ^ elf .-- M)PEYEOPROPDmANDnDRMPLAN NAVD ASSUMES 0.1'OF DEPTH ACROSS FOOTPRINT 4. IF RESTORATION NFORMATON NOT SPECIFIED BY OWNER, GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN - 14 DAYS USING &ROOT SEED MIX 250 OR COVERED USING WOOD FIBER BLAWET OR MULCH. USE OF ' - STRAWISNOTALLOWED. 5. ALL STOCAMES INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OUTSIDE ANY SLTFENCE LOCATION. B, CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL 41NAL STABILIZATION' 7. PROPOSED CONTOUR GRACES BASED ON SUPPLIED BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY OTHERS. 8. SILT FENCE PLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO FENCES PROVIDE 1FT MN SETBACK 9. WHEN VEHICLE ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED, ORANGE CONSTRUCTION PENCE SHOULD eE RACED OVER ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY LOCATION& ti1[DR RFC.xo'NC ITT IF INN wwmm: LNIe»RPN hn I ;m mnWwxpn man.wmNAsc+[n �nlA le W de CteMe N[peehn zM VeYlmlm [m4ez rtN ua bIa>aptltlwRl, W Y,Itli.M'IYmY WwNO' zM'WSY YRMN• biN[mvlm, •ppwn In 4vamnn Yaklbd, Iv Aq[c o.,., mnmlmm mwAm> Ma wnF[,>.� m MtlnNUY, eRmr, wa nda namb. Nln.ro m mF.[.>, mm. .ne •mmiprm maaW Pmve.arn PPravpmMamRnaDNfa p�awntlan N as emmun[ gaNV mr zn0 >II LHn16 PAR Ievn4unYZ>. er dd Pr[ nYv ,znmzb4vm[wrNNn, FN4N Nnm tiv uN N ep� n zwzbuaa>n epvpwnR ft.. w ,mW,Re, n ecmmx m Apes bm Mariner Professional Services F„y.em Nn.+N.'a o WP n..c ,r,R en4mc.. 2035 Fakva A>TPR[eS P SIZ.2162579 PaSarBa, MN 55113 F 651.210.7775 P vn w w..-.. w..a.,�nfa�maA[ur- Pa.cam SHEET SET INDEX T. ESC AND STORMWATER PLAN Engineer CarltaLt Adam Parker BdamP'�jBErdfler -ps.wRl 651218.70`5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE 1 TYPED OR NAME ADAM T. PARKER DATE 7117N4 REG. NO. 42733 IIIIIIIIII' III_ &III' IIIIIIIIII' Z 15 CL W GM cr- O 0 Z Q O llee- O v 0 r_ O � M z 6F` oW CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DWENBIOLS Oil THE WORK Alm REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY TO ME CONSULTANT BEFORE PROMEDINO, ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNERArm MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE VAOOO 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN C) X W CIJENT: QJ Abrader Design C -Lip z 1 401 Laks Steal Ees[ o d' Wayzata, MN 55391 w !� OU473.OM a wr Asx;nderdedBc p.— a DRAWN CHECKED ATP PLAN APPROVED WORN NST'ECTED 717114 r WORK VERIFIED CAD FILE \ z O q PLAN AN DATE IF BM < [ INRI PLAN FRFDUCED SCALE 5/20114 O OHEO(RENBION FM UPDATE ros MTxa+ _ wRrTEaTTRFA1mR1A0.1CJ "`6fOmIWaB±N 'V. M1001•T� -_- ..QpNOM1FA9Q1�Re: z2Afa t �yaOLNT�2EpR WOdFD Q - llAe®RORt2i '�P •..ra ®srAeETTaI . .- aeutmmrlyF •� ..yP4 NOTE!k .9Ir4W101 - T�LRLTDLWN� J -. Po/RTFAUISITE NeGILIXI FF>�T,aorgaFWOmLTasmlRmn�NTY. rFHI. TEaFJ�a1eL> EnA ®1RagRmeMmseemDeanowa'Iwm4raaL - F.TZITwmrf NuGFFEeHaYTUmTET;mf FaT7uRE'a3+c>EnmFrA9wrR RaoO m+msens - Sla EROSION CON DETAIL '-' MONSTRUMMM ASS PAD n -T A AnrL 'F . A 1 — —,s A rn^E- .;F�____= .c�r�.r :uY.r: -A JiMw'6lsa M: n1A: Ylza:w,.rat..�'.'9UJ1JLV.at•'Mr SUPPLEMENTAL ESC AND STORMWATER NOTES: L ELEVATION AND DATUM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP. 2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ACCESS FOR ANY WORK EXTENDING BEYOND THE 'FEMAFLOODPLAIN INFORMATION PROPERTYBOUNDARY. SOURCE DATUeA xOm 3. DUE TO THE PROPERTY REPLACING AN EXISTING OWEI.LNG. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTES WERE p�fp@7DxYFAflFiDmeEYATIDaI - .. ®O IDFWIVW=7LOMN(W$()OTPI NGVD ENTIRELOTOUTOFFEMWF10ODPWN NOTANALYZED. NEW STRUCTURE GENERALLY FOLLOWS EJOSTNG OPENING ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED '- :PIDPDSE➢IfD1f64 &R00013EVATON "SEW vvuaiMRRMIYLT/12(PERMNDNR) NAVD NmomaALASOF712D34 CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT ALTER EXISTING SIDE LOT DRAINAGE PATTERNS WITHIN EASEMENT AND . ";P90PO5CNPA?a&wcw2m2PADMRRM 'a CF SURVEYED PROPEATYANDSIDRM PLAN NAVD ASSUM1ESa1'OF DEATH ACROSS FOOTPRINT SETBACK AREAS. •.;,:.. FRDPDEED1rBma 'avNauu�TVCmJammMFDa+. ^ elf .-- M)PEYEOPROPDmANDnDRMPLAN NAVD ASSUMES 0.1'OF DEPTH ACROSS FOOTPRINT 4. IF RESTORATION NFORMATON NOT SPECIFIED BY OWNER, GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN - 14 DAYS USING &ROOT SEED MIX 250 OR COVERED USING WOOD FIBER BLAWET OR MULCH. USE OF ' - STRAWISNOTALLOWED. 5. ALL STOCAMES INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OUTSIDE ANY SLTFENCE LOCATION. B, CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL 41NAL STABILIZATION' 7. PROPOSED CONTOUR GRACES BASED ON SUPPLIED BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY OTHERS. 8. SILT FENCE PLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO FENCES PROVIDE 1FT MN SETBACK 9. WHEN VEHICLE ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED, ORANGE CONSTRUCTION PENCE SHOULD eE RACED OVER ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY LOCATION& ti1[DR RFC.xo'NC ITT IF INN wwmm: LNIe»RPN hn I ;m mnWwxpn man.wmNAsc+[n �nlA le W de CteMe N[peehn zM VeYlmlm [m4ez rtN ua bIa>aptltlwRl, W Y,Itli.M'IYmY WwNO' zM'WSY YRMN• biN[mvlm, •ppwn In 4vamnn Yaklbd, Iv Aq[c o.,., mnmlmm mwAm> Ma wnF[,>.� m MtlnNUY, eRmr, wa nda namb. Nln.ro m mF.[.>, mm. .ne •mmiprm maaW Pmve.arn PPravpmMamRnaDNfa p�awntlan N as emmun[ gaNV mr zn0 >II LHn16 PAR Ievn4unYZ>. er dd Pr[ nYv ,znmzb4vm[wrNNn, FN4N Nnm tiv uN N ep� n zwzbuaa>n epvpwnR ft.. w ,mW,Re, n ecmmx m Apes bm Mariner Professional Services F„y.em Nn.+N.'a o WP n..c ,r,R en4mc.. 2035 Fakva A>TPR[eS P SIZ.2162579 PaSarBa, MN 55113 F 651.210.7775 P vn w w..-.. w..a.,�nfa�maA[ur- Pa.cam SHEET SET INDEX T. ESC AND STORMWATER PLAN Engineer CarltaLt Adam Parker BdamP'�jBErdfler -ps.wRl 651218.70`5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE 1 TYPED OR NAME ADAM T. PARKER DATE 7117N4 REG. NO. 42733 IIIIIIIIII' III_ &III' IIIIIIIIII' Z 15 CL W GM cr- O 0 Z Q O llee- O v 0 r_ O � M z 6F` oW CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DWENBIOLS Oil THE WORK Alm REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY TO ME CONSULTANT BEFORE PROMEDINO, ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNERArm MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE VAOOO 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN C) X W CIJENT: QJ Abrader Design C -Lip z 1 401 Laks Steal Ees[ o d' Wayzata, MN 55391 w !� OU473.OM a wr Asx;nderdedBc p.— a DRAWN CHECKED ATP PLAN APPROVED WORN NST'ECTED 717114 r WORK VERIFIED CAD FILE \ z O q PLAN AN DATE IF BM < [ INRI PLAN FRFDUCED SCALE 5/20114 O OHEO(RENBION FM UPDATE ti1[DR RFC.xo'NC ITT IF INN wwmm: LNIe»RPN hn I ;m mnWwxpn man.wmNAsc+[n �nlA le W de CteMe N[peehn zM VeYlmlm [m4ez rtN ua bIa>aptltlwRl, W Y,Itli.M'IYmY WwNO' zM'WSY YRMN• biN[mvlm, •ppwn In 4vamnn Yaklbd, Iv Aq[c o.,., mnmlmm mwAm> Ma wnF[,>.� m MtlnNUY, eRmr, wa nda namb. Nln.ro m mF.[.>, mm. .ne •mmiprm maaW Pmve.arn PPravpmMamRnaDNfa p�awntlan N as emmun[ gaNV mr zn0 >II LHn16 PAR Ievn4unYZ>. er dd Pr[ nYv ,znmzb4vm[wrNNn, FN4N Nnm tiv uN N ep� n zwzbuaa>n epvpwnR ft.. w ,mW,Re, n ecmmx m Apes bm Mariner Professional Services F„y.em Nn.+N.'a o WP n..c ,r,R en4mc.. 2035 Fakva A>TPR[eS P SIZ.2162579 PaSarBa, MN 55113 F 651.210.7775 P vn w w..-.. w..a.,�nfa�maA[ur- Pa.cam SHEET SET INDEX T. ESC AND STORMWATER PLAN Engineer CarltaLt Adam Parker BdamP'�jBErdfler -ps.wRl 651218.70`5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE 1 TYPED OR NAME ADAM T. PARKER DATE 7117N4 REG. NO. 42733 IIIIIIIIII' III_ &III' IIIIIIIIII' Z 15 CL W GM cr- O 0 Z Q O llee- O v 0 r_ O � M z 6F` oW CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DWENBIOLS Oil THE WORK Alm REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY TO ME CONSULTANT BEFORE PROMEDINO, ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNERArm MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE VAOOO 4603 ANNAWAY RD EDINA, MN C) X W CIJENT: QJ Abrader Design C -Lip z 1 401 Laks Steal Ees[ o d' Wayzata, MN 55391 w !� OU473.OM a wr Asx;nderdedBc p.— a DRAWN CHECKED ATP PLAN APPROVED WORN NST'ECTED 717114 r WORK VERIFIED CAD FILE \ z O q PLAN AN DATE IF BM < [ INRI PLAN FRFDUCED SCALE 5/20114 O OHEO(RENBION FM UPDATE ma mil IM M Egg� E! w L-- ==Paz=: ,��_� Ws�� -s���e �a5 r AHAA,NDER f j \1_I[ \, \ \UEI, Ill.�ll�A GH��I'P elm EM ...__ �1'llm�noulOmnl � pr �/''���� ® ®� ® ® ®��� Estee AL COPYWSW 2dVA ALNXACOt MUNIOMP ICL �''�� _-qql I XFJO all _�� ®1��r�..�1i1 N M ENE ■ENEM .... LER COPTRIC61T 2CK A AY. _ �u �GsoR; s -. � :oi �� fflc COPTRIC61T 2CK A AY. _ �u Hwy ":ZJ o . P ORP� lass To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: V.I.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ED Discussion Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning from POD -I, to PUD and Preliminary Development Plan, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative; 3330 66'h Street. Res. No. 2014 -93 and Res. No. 2014 -94. Action Requested: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -93, approving the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the following: ➢ To allow affordable housing, in addition to senior housing in the Regional Medical District. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District & Preliminary Development Plan Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -94, approving the Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and approving the Preliminary Development Plan. Planning Commission Recommendation: On August 13, 2014 the Planning Commission recommended the following: 1. Denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow affordable housing in the Regional Medical District. Vote: 3 Ayes, 2 Nays. 2. Approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Regional Medical District that would incorporate language into the Comprehensive Plan that would allow this type of project. The suggestion is to incorporate guidelines that would allow this type of facility. Vote; 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. 3. Approval of preliminary rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1 to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. As a result of the Planning Commission recommendation, staff would offer the following options for the Council to consider: REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Page 2 Nonresiden tial and Mixed Use Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines RM Hospitals, senior housing *, medical and Form -based 12 -80 senior residential and affordable Categories dental offices and clinics, and laboratories design dwelling units per acre. Regional for performing medical or dental research, standards for 12 -80 senior residential and affordable Medical diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical building Floor to Area Ratio - Per current Zoning Medical work, having a direct relationship to the placement, Code: maximum of 1.0 for medical providing of health services. General office massing and office uses. Density for senior housing uses, and affordable housing .* are permitted. street -level and affordable housing shall be based on providing of health services. General office treatment. proximity to hospitals, proximity to low * Senior housing may include: independent living, street -level density uses, utilities capacity, level of assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Pedestrian transit service available, and impact on — Affordable housing shall be as defined by the circulation adjacent roads. Other desired items to and open allow greater density would include: Metropolitan Council. Metropolitan Council. Affordable housing shall require a PUD rezoning, which would include space Below grade parking, provision of park services for residents.• provided for amenities or open space, affordable housing, larger sites. should be sustainable design principles, and provided for provision of public art. Larger sites. Option 2 Nonresiden tial and Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines Mixed Use Categories RM Hospitals, senior housing *, medical and Form -based 12 -80 senior residential and affordable Regional dental offices and clinics, and laboratories design dwelling units per acre. Medical for performing medical or dental research, standards for diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical building Floor to Area Ratio - Per current work, having a direct relationship to the placement, Zoning Code: maximum of 1.0 for providing of health services. General office massing and medical office uses. Density for uses and affordable housing" are permitted. street -level senior housing and specialty housing treatment. shall be based on proximity to ` Senior housing may include: independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Pedestrian circulation hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of ` "Affordable housing shall be as defined by the and open space amenities should be transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, Metropolitan Council. Affordable housing shall require a PUD rezoning, which would include conditions related to provision of supportive services for residents.• provided for provision of park or open space, larger sites. affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Option 3 Page 3 Nonresiden Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines tial and Guidelines Mixed Use Categories Hospitals, senior housing *, medical and Form -based 12 -80 senior residential and affordable RM Hospitals, senior housing *, medical and Form -based 12 -80 senior residential and affordable Regional dental offices and clinics, and laboratories design dwelling units per acre. Medical for performing medical or dental research, standards for Floor to Area Ratio - Per current diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical building Floor to Area Ratio - Per current work, having a direct relationship to the placement, Zoning Code: maximum of 1.0 for providing of health services. General office massing and medical office uses. Density for uses and affordable housing ** with supportive street -level senior housing and specialty housing services * ** are permitted. treatment. shall be based on proximity to * Senior housing may include: independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Pedestrian hospitals, proximity to low density ' Senior housing may include: independent living, circulation uses, utilities capacity, level of identified in the comprehensive plan to serve a assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. and open transit service available, and impact provision of park or open space, ` *Affordable housing shall be as defined by the space on adjacent roads. Other desired larger sites. amenities items to allow greater density would Metropolitan Council. should be include: Below grade parking, `* *Supportive services are services to assist provided for provision of park or open space, residents with maintaining stability in housing and larger sites. affordable housing, sustainable employment. design principles, and provision of public art. Option 4 Nonresiden tial and Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines Mixed Use Categories RM Hospitals, senior housing *, medical and Form -based 12 -80 senior residential and affordable Regional dental offices and clinics, and laboratories design dwelling units per acre. Medical for performing medical or dental research, standards for diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical building Floor to Area Ratio - Per current work, having a direct relationship to the placement, Zoning Code: maximum of 1.0 for providing of health services. General office massing and medical office uses. Density for uses and specialty housing ** with supportive street -level senior housing and specialty housing services * *' are permitted. treatment. shall be based on proximity to Pedestrian hospitals, proximity to low density * Senior housing may include: independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. circulation and open uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact . *Specialty housing may include: a housing need space amenities should be on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, identified in the comprehensive plan to serve a need in the City and also meet development goals provided for provision of park or open space, established in the PUD Ordinance. ** * Supportive services are services to assist larger sites. affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. residents with maintaining stability in housing and employment. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION ! Page 4 ` In addition, the PUD Zoning Ordinance that would be created for the site would specifically regulate the type of use that would be allowed on the site. The PUD Ordinance would be written during the second phase of this review process. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan per the findings and conditions outlined in the attached Resolutions. Information /Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — October 7, 2014) The City Council is asked to consider a redevelopment request of the existing TCF Bank building, located at 333066 th Street by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon). The applicant proposes to remodel and expand the building into 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18 -22) who have experienced homelessness. The size of the units would range from 322 -451 square feet. Each unit would contain a full kitchen and bathroom. The building would contain offices for on -site service providers and property management. There would also be a community area for residents; a fitness area; a computer lab and a laundry room. (See applicant narrative and plans within the attached Planning Commission staff report.) The site is 39,204 square feet in size. The existing bank is 18,179 square feet. The proposed addition would be 10,458 square feet. The building would remain two stories. The remodel of the building would retain the existing brick, and the addition would be brick with metal panels. There would be 19 surface parking stalls. Proof of parking would total 37 total surface stalls. No enclosed parking is proposed. The applicants have indicated in their narrative that 18% of their residents have cars. Beacon anticipates that no more than 12 stalls would be required for residents. The maximum need for staff parking is 6 stalls. Therefore, they believe they would have adequate parking. Residents are expected to utilize the Metro Transit bus service available across the street at Southdale. All of the 39 units would be considered affordable housing, and would apply towards the City and Met Council's goal for affordable housing. The Comprehensive Plan defines the site and area as RM, Regional Medical. The RM allows for senior housing on a case by case basis, however, does not allow other housing. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required. This development proposal is subject to a two -step review process. The first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to allow affordable housing in addition to Senior Housing in the Regional Medical District. (4/5 Vote of the City Council required.) 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan. (3/5 Vote of the City Council required.) REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 5 If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved by the City Council, the following is then-required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to a PUD. 2.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD District. This property is located within an area of the City that is.designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive' Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council did not require a Small Area Plan during the Sketch Plan Review. ATTACHMENTS: O Resolution No. 2014 -93 G Resolution No. 2014 -94 C Planning Commission minutes, August 13, 2014 C Planning Commission staff report dated August 13, 2014 RESOLUTM NO. 2014-93 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THE RMD, REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon), is proposing remodel and expand the existing TCF Bank building at 3330 66th Street, into 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18 -22) who have experienced homelessness. 1.02 The site is 39,204 square feet in size. The existing bank is 18,179 square feet. The proposed addition would be 10,458 square feet. The building would remain two stories. The remodel of the building would retain the existing brick, and the addition would be brick with metal panels. 1.03 There would be 19 surface parking stalls. Proof of parking would total 37 total surface stalls. No enclosed parking is proposed. The applicants have indicated in their narrative that 18% of their residents have cars. Beacon anticipates that no more than 12 stalls would be required for residents. The maximum need for staff parking is 6 stalls. Therefore, they believe they would have adequate parking. Residents are expected to utilize the Metro Transit bus service available across the street at Southdale. 1.04 All of the 39 units would be considered affordable housing, and would apply towards the City and Met Council's goal for affordable housing. 1.05 The Comprehensive Plan defines the site and area as RM, Regional Medical. The RM allows for senior housing on a case by case basis, however, does not allow other housing. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required. 1.06 The specific Comprehensive Plan amendment is to allow affordable housing in addition to Senior Housing in the Regional Medical District. 1.03 On August 23, 2014, the Planning Commission made the following motions: 1: Denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow affordable housing in the Regional Medical District. Vote: 3 Ayes, 2 Nays. 2. Approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Regional Medical that would incorporate language into the Comprehensive Plan that would allow this type of project. The suggestion is to incorporate guidelines that would allow this type of facility. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-93 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following. findings: 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. This project would include 39 new affordable housing units (100% of the projects units) toward that goal. 2. The proposed density of 43 units per acre is reasonable, and within the density range suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 12 -80 units per acre. 3. The RM District allows senior housing currently. The proposed affordable housing project would include units that are small in size generally similar to senior housing; and the residents within the proposed project typically do not drive, similar to senior housing. 4. The proposed affordable housing project would generate less traffic than the existing bank facility. 5. The project would utilize sustainability principles. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Communities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15% energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro Transit; impervious surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special construction material; installing a rain garden for storm water management; and pedestrian oriented design. The project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. c) Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. d) Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-93 Page 3 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Nonresidential and Mixed Use Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines RM Hospitals, senior housing *, medical Form -based 12 -80 senior residential and affordable and dental offices and clinics, and design standards dwelling units per acre. Regional Medical laboratories for performing medical for building or dental research, diagnostic placement, Floor to Area Ratio -Per current Zoning testing, analytical or clinical work, massing and Code: maximum of 1.0 for medical having a direct relationship to the street -level office uses. Density for senior housing providing of health services. treatment. and affordable housing shall be based on General office uses and affordable proximity to hospitals, proximity to low housing are permitted. Pedestrian density uses, utilities capacity, level of circulation and transit service available, and impact on • Senior housing may include: open space adjacent roads. Other desired items to independent living, assisted living, amenities allow greater density would include: memory care, and skilled nursing. should be Below grade parking, provision of park provided for or open space, affordable housing, larger sites. sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-93 Page 4 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I. the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2014-94 PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT -1, to PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMAND AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT_ PLANFOR 3330 66TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative proposes to remodel and expand the building into 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18 -22) who have experienced homelessness. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 3; Southdale Acres, Hennepin County Minnesota 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 2. Preliminary Development Plan. 1.04 On August 13, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. This project would include 39 new affordable housing units toward that goal. 2. The proposed density of 43 units per acre is reasonable, and within the density ran ge suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 12 -80 units per acre. 3. The proposed affordable housing project would generate less traffic than the existing bank facility. 4. The project would utilize sustainability principles. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Comm_ unities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15 °/ one-re, savings; loc-at -- - the -'� "_ _ to make _f Nl t T cit imperyiong o� o o � i CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN:gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-94 Page 2 surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special construction material; installing a rain garden for storm water management; and pedestrian oriented design. 5. Project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. c) Encourage an integrated mix of building,type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. d) Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 20, 2014. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 15, 2014. (See pages A46 -A47.) 5. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to review and approval of the Metropolitan Council on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-94 Page 3 Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on September 2, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF'CITY CLERK I, the undersigned appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk 1. � J Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Beacon lroterfaith Housing.' 3330 q V\ West 66 h Street Planner Presentation Planner Rothstein informed the Commission to consider a redevelopment request of the existing TCF Bank building, located at 3330 66th Street by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon). The applicant proposes to remodel and expand the building into 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults who have experienced homelessness. The size of the units would r e from 322 -451 square feet. Each unit would contain a full kitchen and. room. The building would contain offices for on -site service providers a dperty management. There would also be a community area for reside t`sess area; a computer lab and a laundry room. ;;: Continuing, Rothstein told the Commission' site is 39,204 sq, a .e feet in size. The existing bank is 18, g 179 square feet.. T� rroposed addition W4641,1 be 10,458 square feet. The building would remain two s' o k es. The�'emodel of tf -E- building would retain the existing brick, arthe addition , ©dbe�'rick with metal; .,anels. There would be 19 surface parking` ,s of parg would total 37 total surface stalls. No enclosed parking "is:propq, d. The applicants have indicated in 0 X�, 4 "��p. ��4 �� their narrative that 18 ,ottheir residQs�have,q V,;sB eaco `anticipates that no more than 12 stalls wo aUelbr..e uired for reside:he maxtrnum need for staff parking is 6 stalls. �Tlaerefore;3ley believeh�ey4. oulev�adequate parking. Residents are exp!e a to utiliz he Metro T` ansit bus service available across the street at Southdal6a\ �__ �` All of Me it � oNuld bey`cOssideretl �fifforrdafff housing, and would apply i fe City and��1(et Councils goal f6r,a"ordable housing. Rothstein f a` er explain6d that they, omprehensive Plan defines the site and area , ti \ as RM, Regi`ona Medical. The�RM al�ows for senior housing on a case by case t basis, howeveri oes not allow'other housing. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is req . ired. Rods ein added this development proposal is subject to a two -step review pro. ss he first step in the process is to obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive. Guide Plan Amendment to allow affordable housing in addition to Senior Housing in the Regional Medical District. 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1 Planned Office District -1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan. (3/5 Vote of the City Council required.) If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved. by the City Council, the following is then required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to a PUD. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD District. Rothstein further noted that the property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive OIL or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to,,J@ ning application. ti, However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plafirests with the City Council." The City Council did not require a Small Area PI an:during'`the „Sketch Plan Review. f Planner Rothstein stated staff believes th6 proposed Comprehensi e;:Plan Amendment is reasonable for the site for the following reasogs: A 1. Affordable housing is identif 't a need in lhe.`Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assistthe City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Couri�cil of'p.o iding 212,new affordable housing units by the year 2020. This,project would include 39 new affordable housing units toward 9 that goal. That would,.make up of thetota units in the project. 2. The proposed d' sity'of�43 units per acre i&,feasona�ble, and within the density range sugges 6 in the Comprehensi e..Plan of between 12 -80 units per acre. q<1 3. The RM District allows senior housing currently. The proposed affordable housing project wo ld include units,�that are small. m. size generally similar to senior housing 'and�the residents�withi6416” proposed project typically do not drive, similar tosenior housing \,4The proposed affordable housing project would generate less tra �,b\than the existi ng. bank facility. 4. The project would utilize: sustainability principles. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Comm unitiesCriteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to:4a , 5% energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro Transit; imperviou surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of spe 6'Ja� construction material; installing a rain garden for storm water management; and pedestrian oriented design. 5. Project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. c) Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. d) Incorporate principles.of'sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design; construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. Rothstein explained the housing proposed by Beacon would not have a direct connection to the RM, Regional Medical District. The structure would be located several blocks from the hospital. There would not be a direct tie in to any medical use in the area. . The Regional Medical Zoning District contemplates a.':Ocre minimum lot size. It is intended for larger medical type uses along with senior,housing which benefits from being in close proximity to medical uses: W �`M \P Planner Rothstein concluded that staff reco '.�rnends that the CityCouncil approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amend merit to allow affordable ,4pusing in the RMD District subject to the following findings: 1. Affordable housing is identif ed a a need in Ngl omprehensive Plafi; and the proposed amendment would�"�is the City in ra ting its established affordable �. i housing goal with the Met Coundil .of,pro ding 212 ew affordable housing units by the year.2020. This roject wou�d`include39Yew a ble housing units (100% �pp 1Y \ \� of the projects u ts'toWard that goal.``�`;�� 2. The proposed of 43: units per acre,(s reasonable, and within the density range sugges4ihe ComprehensiPlan of between 12 -80 units per acre. 3. The RM District ahlo . s se or housing c rrently. The proposed affordable housing projec .ould includekn4ts, hatzare smallr'size generally similar to senior hoouus : gn anc ,H' resi en�ts withrmtfi.Np,�roposed project typically do not drive, similar Y to ."senior housing` - �.; 4. Th , ject would ut ltze sustamability principles. Most notable elements include: comp, la; ce with Minhesota C{verlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Commuies Criteria;` "x �'`' utll;zmg the: existing building rather than a tear down; committing t a 15% energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro �,yt e, Transit; imp ious_surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special struction material; installing a rain garden for storm water management; andpde man oriented design. 5. The project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. C) Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. d) Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. Rothstein further recommended the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning and approve the Preliminary Development Plan, based on the following findings: I. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its establishe affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 212 new affordable hobs g?units by the year 2020. This project would include 39 new affordable housing.. units o a�d that goal. k+k 1111 2. The proposed density of 43 units per acre is reasonable, an 1thin the density range suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 12 -80 uni s.< a acre. The proposed gg P �� \.�'�' �� P P affordable housing project would generatele5s traffic than the existing bank facility. 2. The project would utilize sustainability principles. Most notable ele . e . is include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and G'i�ide o the 29Q.1 Enterpi iNCGreen Communities Criteria; utilizing,4-he existing bui d�%g,rather than a tear dow; committing to a 15% energy savings; locatiQgebuilding to make use of Metro Transit; impervious surface would be reduced by 6.M d la�nced landscaping\ making use of special construction material; installing a'` ` n garder�kfor storrri�water management; and pedestrian oriented 3. Project would To a) Promotion.: of a vis incomes; ardabilit of lifecYCle goals and objectives: ommun,ity that is inclusive o a wide range o ages, offers range of housing options for Edina a range of housing options that meet people 's = preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. c);, Encourage'a'.Wlntegrabe" &mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single ,buildings or building groups. d) ']Ineorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of des.'ign, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing Preliminary approval is also'sbject to the following conditions: The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 20, 2014. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 15, 2014. 5. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to review and approval of the Metropolitan Council on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Appearing for the Applicant Lee Blons, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collabo Applicant presentation Ms. Blons addressed the Commission giving a brWRhistor is their first in Edina and Beacon is co laborating wit�di Church. Continuing, Blons reported at�,the 39 studio�a suburban homeless young adults. Blons�aa d1 ,1hey believe She pointed out it is located directly o .bus lir1e;:and is medical. Blons introduced. Carol Lansin of�Faegretiar "d`e Works."��44:_. Ms. Lansing term. Mr. Nelsovit of g the Prp�o -of Parking agreement Road. C n �inuing, Nelso6z' d Hal to create a rn ; �e welcoming sit vegetation plah`e would be at of the building 411 ave a conte VInterfaith. Blons said this munity Lutheran tment unit projectt'would serve :.location of 66 West is terrific. n walking distance of retail and +l 1J. on'•and_ Bart Nelson of Urban y�k' rdablc ";;,Housing isn't a'`vague term it's a recognized gave arbr�efi�descr,•iption of the units, parking stall count and Ison also reported access' to the site would be off Barrie ss \gin = pe(ghe request of the Commission the fence was removed lels`g ,' said a rain garden would be incorporated and the 50 %16tive plantings. Concluding, Nelson said the exterior rare look. Continuing, Ms. Blons a lained`the concept for the project adding their intent is to build .� �r:. relationships between ten ntsSand the neighborhood. The units are independent living with an on -site property manager. She further explained that multiple support services are provided, nutrition, independent living skills, etc., adding their intent is for all residents to have support. Blons reported there will be three full time staff to include overnight staffing. Blons thanked the Commission for their support. Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked if the residents of the building are considered permanent. Ms. Blons responded in the affirmative, adding the "stay" rate is usually six months to three years. Forrest asked how the project is funded. Blons responded that this type of project works backward. Approval is first; funding next. Continuing, Blons said a project like 66 West has diversified funding including private contributions. Forrest questioned age requirements. Blons responded the majority of the tenants are between 18 -21 years. Forrest further asked where the tenants come from. Blons explained that the majority of the tenants come through referrals. Forrest asked the turnover rate. Blons responded that 7 -10 residents move in /out throughout the year. Forrest questioned if the tenant mix will be male, female or both. Blons responded that hadn't been decided yet; however their other buildings service both young men and women. Continuing, Forrest explained she is struggling with amendig" h" Comprehensive Plan to include "affordable" housing in the RM guided area. Ms. -Ls ng told Commissioner Forrest that the Commission has the discretion on policy Commissioner Platteter asked if the tenants arp,,, . quired to sign a l'e'ase. Ms. Blons responded in the affirmative, adding the residents are ex ected to comply with'allrequirements in the lease. She said if a tenant doesn't comply wit 4�4t;e, requirements their lease<<would be terminated, adding staff would guide them to otherhousing,� jf�"appropriate `�`Gommissioner Platteter questioned security /safety. Ms. Blons d.,th: e- entrances are secured entrances with security cameras. Platteter asked bout the daytin is present and access is secured vis Commissioner Platteter said. landscaping added to the�we ;?:'N' added their goal is tq�save as A discussion ensued was ackno (e ged� t It's a resi�ehce i h could b6�' nsidered co Chair Staunton o The following spoke to viewing sting e. "buzzed ndscapirig, += 4 �spond,ed. )urs. Blons said during the day staff he " would like to see additional ould b&Willing to look at that. He discussi:fig the makeup of the proposed housing. It i,.Jiffere t ^from a "regular" apartment building. � ,s € ' i'ncliide everything from nutrition to transition 1 that tfie:>services provided at the proposed residence Comp Plan RM guided area. ng. Sheila Rzepecki, 6617 Normandale Road, addressed the Commission. Ms. Sims, 6433 Barrie Road, addressed the Commission. Mrs. Prince, 7200 York Ave #602, addressed the Commission Rev. Erik Strand, Edina Community Lutheran Church, 5732 Abbott Ave, addressed the Commission. Marilyn Peters, 6429 Barrie Road, addressed the Commission. Bill Davis, 6616 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Commission. Ms. Wood, 6525 Drew Avenue, addressed the Commission. Thomas Stone, Nicollet Square, #404, addressed the Commission. MJ Bauer, 7609 Gleason Road, Addressed the Commission. Pacy Erck, 6315 Colony Way, addressed the Commission. .Mikkel Beckman, Hennepin County, 318 East 38th Street; addressed the Commission Tom Nelson, Kenwood /Lowry Hill neighborhood, addressed the Commission. Robert Hobbins, 4708. Upper Terrace, addressed the 'Commission Carol Truesdell, 9 Woodland Road, addressed the Commission. Pastor Mary Albing, Lutheran Church of Christ the .Redeemer, addressed the Commission. Lynn Truesdell; 9 Woodland Road, addressed the Commission. Jenette Augustson, 5000 Arden Avenue,. addressed the Com ission. Floyd Grabiel, 4817 Wilford Way, addressed the Commission Betsy Cruz, 8109 Dupont Ave., addressed the Commissio Jon Good, 6816 Brittany Road, addressed the Commiso Lisa Netzer, 6024 Timber Trail, addressed the Co mission. Linda Schmitz, 6483 Barrie Road, addressed the - G'p�T mission . Nate Schmeltzer, 132 West 62 "d Street, addre,�ed the Commission.'�4 Maura Schnonbach, 6221 Balder Lane, addresse N, e Commission. Marcia Kermeen 232 Morgan Avenue, address I a Commission. ission. � ' g�� �' . Jennifer Rolfes, 7675 Woodview Court, addressed &Comrraission. Lisa Thompson, 5500 Benton Aven , essed the G m�mission. Rose Minor, 6519. Barrie Road, Step`b ee ., Montessori, �`d�dressed the Commission. Denise, Prior Lake addressed the Com fission ` y Sandy Perzinski, 6519 Bar..ie...Road, Step. Step Montessori, adds ssed the Commission. ` 1\ i '4'x.•4\ \ \i` 2007 West 61 Street 04u,,esskd tthe Co sion Elizabeth Briden, poi 652�arrie M „addressed�the`Commissio� David .Coolaird, 710faetro Boulvard, addressee the Commission. Bob Long,tarkin Hoffmmaddressed the Comission 5100 Dane s ®r-i. a addressedtthGriission`� Father ud`o 820 St. Patrick s Lane addressed the Commission. Adam str Vim, St. Step `s Chus eke - addressed"t a Commission. % p Rhonda40Olson, 5109 Beardwenue`a'ddressed the Commission. ' \`4i Apr; Sullivan •6832 Gleason Road addressed the Commission. Mark Swiggurim' addressed the � 5 ommission. Mark Chamberlin x,004 Bristol�B. d., addressed the Commission.' Geoff Workinger, 5224Xellogg;Aienue, addressed the Commission. Chair Staunton asked if ariyone'else would like to speak, being none Staunton thanked everyone for their input andasked for a motion to close the public hearing. r Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Kilberg commented that he is struggling with the request to PUD as submitted. Kilberg stated he's not convinced this isn't residential creep into a office /commercial neighborhood. Continuing, Kilberg said in his opinion the businesses have valid concerns about the proposed rezoning to PUD to allow housing. Concluding, Commissioner Kilberg reiterated this could be considered reverse creep; commercial to residential, not residential to commercial. Commissioner Carr asked for clarification on the zoning /rezoning. Planner Rothstein explained that currently the property is zoned POD -I, Planned Office District and is guided in the Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) as Regional Medical and earmarked as an area for potential change. The request before the Commission this evening is a Comp Plan Amendment and rezoning to PUD to allow housing other than senior. .a10\ A brief discussion ensued on the recently approved rezoning ::for 6500 France allowing senior housing. It was pointed out that aspects of that�ploject are strictly tied to medical (assisted living; aftercare; hospice) and that coincidesw.ith the Regional Medical guide. The Commission acknowledged the current request:is ;difficult becausewhile the City encourages "affordable housing" there isn't a specific zoniti guide for that and to tie,the "affordable" use to medial may be difficult. Chair Staunton acknowledged this is,,a thriving medical ,areaP \however, the proposed housing does include support services and is�a� cared environm;`ent:` Staunton said in his opinion this use "feels different" from market'rate' lousing. It's an?e'nYironment that helps its residents on different levels. Commissioner'Platteter agreed;:adding this is just the other end t, of the spectrum. The elderly,, need supp 54 tservices'an , so dot ese young adults. ..i`.YY`.. ,.`.4•:`d`::.. eti Commissioner Forrest said the"'r4equest is cr 'thing' interesting iiansion. She pointed out on one hand the City has a mandate to provide affordal .i' housing opportunities; however, the means to provide it are limited" also_ . pointed out:the site isn't zoned RMD its only guided RM ' the�Com Plan ?Z ned and> uided`are.two different thins Continuing, Forrest said the `e nlist tie `a Way to craf _language that:would 'allow this use in the Regional Medicalsitnilar to a senior ::housiiiguse in RM guided areas. Concluding, Forrest also pointed .. out if th\e `,.City stays strictlyb._how'`ai, area is guided there are a number of uses in the area "guided" Qe nal Medical th'k-Aon't meet;the definition. g g Commissioner Carr: said she cai'tsupport the proposal as presented. She stated it's not consistent with the R�e`gional ed caI District Comp Plan guide classification, adding the neighbors in her opini if.. raised valid points, adding this could be considered spot zoning. Chair Staunton said the Commission could eliminate the word affordable and say housing located in an area guided as Regional Medical must include support services. Commissioner Forrest said she agrees, adding her concern is with the word "affordable" adding it's a language thing. Chair Staunton agreed "affordable" housing doesn't solve it; there needs to be a mention of housing linked with care /support services that maintains the values of the Comp Plan and its goal of affordable housing. Commissioner -Carr said whatever the Commission decides, if the Comprehensive Plan is Amended, it's a significant change. She said a change like this may warrant more public input, adding it's clearly not medical related. Chair Staunton pointed out if the sticking point is amending the Comprehensive Plan the Commission should note without an amendment to the Comp Plan the project as proposed can't move forward. Motions Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend ame`'`difiky the Comprehensive Guide Plan based on staff findings and subject to staWonditions. Commenting further, gd��' Platteter stated he doesn't like the use of the W" suggesting that it be changed to "housing with support services ". Motion,fail`ed for lack pf second. Commissioner Carr moved to recomnezdenial of the request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan to allowaffordable housing t a Regional Medical District. Commissioner Forrest secnded tinotion. s; Forrest, Lee, Carr. Nays; Platteter, Stauntog: i,, lotion to deny „ca i d 3 -2 vote `h11' `�� Yl^�> U1 A discussion ensued with some Com �s�sione Ns expressin 4.the opinion that while they support the project their issue is with the word \`" ffor��' as writte in the proposed guide plan amendment. Commissio �rgs id they Tstrugglmg �to find an� appropriate way to approve an amendment to the Cop p s a Pla n; howeverre at a loss in `clarifying their intent. Commissioner Forrest ° kec general in terms. Forresai A Knutson res -o 'ded,the C ..�� `h Council fort eir'consderati Commissi over Forrest., Plan /Region'a� Medical by allow this � e\', pf ro ect tYP nSN\ P 1 motion. Ayes V,%rrest, L Commissioner Platte Planned Office Distric seconded the motion. carried 4 -1. iutso -%if a motion could be made that was more to hav�ie :exact language "on the spot ". Attorney eQ \ ory, adding they can recommend anything to the ed`f&' ecommend amending the Comprehensive Guide orpo'rAing guidelines /goals /requirements that would i�e Regional Medical. Commissioner Lee seconded the 1?latteter. Staunton. Nay; Carr. Motion carried 4 -1. ed to recommend preliminary rezoning from POD -I, PUD, Planned Unit Development. Commissioner Lee ; Platteter, Forrest, Lee, Staunton. Nay; Carr. Motion City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: August 13, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: 333066 th Street (Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative) MEMO, tt,9iN��l''Ir o e,, v � . �O The staff report for this project was included in July 23rd Planning Commission packet. Please refer to that document. Please revise the Comprehensive Plan Amendment language from the previous report to re- locate the "affordable housing" to be separated from the hospital uses as follows: Nonresidential and Mixed Use Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines RM Hospitals, senior housing *, Form -based design 12 -80 senior residential and aff^rrla medical standards for building affordable dwelling units per acre. Regional and dental offices and clinics, placement, massing Medical and laboratories for and street -level Floor to Area Ratio - Per current performing medical or dental treatment. Zoning Code: maximum of 1.0 for research, diagnostic testing, medical office uses. Density for senior analytical or clinical work, Pedestrian circulation housing and affordable housing shall having a direct relationship to and open space be based on proximity to hospitals, the providing of health amenities should be proximity to low density uses, utilities services. General office uses provided for larger capacity, level of transit service and and affordable housing sites. available, and impact on adjacent are permitted. roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, • Senior housing may include: sustainable design principles, and independent living, assisted provision of public art. living, memory care, and skilled nursing. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 w9SN��� A. O e p, 0 H� � �y FLHNP�I��O COO �i ISSION STAFF REPCO�RT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 23, 2013 VI.D. Community Development Director ZlIfF'ORMATIOWfBACKGROUND Project Description The Planning Commission is asked to consider a redevelopment request of the existing TCF Bank building, located at 3330 66th Street by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon). (See property location on pages Al A8.) The applicant proposes to remodel and expand the building into 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18 -22) who have experienced homelessness. The size of the units would range from 322- 451 square feet. Each unit would contain a full kitchen and bathroom. The building would contain offices for on -site service providers and property management. There would also be a community area for residents; a fitness area; a computer lab and a laundry room. (See applicant narrative. and plans on pages A9 —A45.) The site is 39,204 square feet in size. The existing bank is.18,179 square feet. The proposed addition would be 10,458 square feet. The building would remain two stories. The remodel of the building would retain the existing brick, and the addition would be brick with metal panels. (See building renderings on pages A41 —A44.) There would be 19 surface parking stalls. Proof of parking would total 37 total surface stalls. No enclosed parking is proposed. The applicants have indicated in their narrative that 18% of their residents have cars. Beacon anticipates that no more than 12 stalls would be required for residents. The maximum need for staff parking is 6 stalls. Therefore, they believe they would have adequate parking. Residents are expected to utilize the Metro Transit bus service available across the street at Southdale. All of the 39 units would be considered affordable housing, and would apply towards the City and Met Council's goal for affordable housing. The Comprehensive Plan defines the site and area as RM, Regional Medical. The RM allows for senior housing on a case by case basis, however, does not allow other housing. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required. This development proposal is subject to a. two -step review process. The first step in the' process is to. obtain the following approvals: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to allow affordable housing i i :addition to Senior Housing in the Regional Medical District :(4/5 Vote of the City Council required.) 2. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to POD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan. (3/5 Vote of the City Council required.) If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan are approved by the City Council, the following ;is then required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to a PUD. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD District. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A3.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study, prior to planning, application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council did not require a Small Area Plan during the Sketch Plan Review. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office buildings; zoned POD -1, Planned Office District and guided RM, Regional Medical District. Easterly: Multi -story office buildings; zoned POD -1, Planned Office District and guided RM, Regional Medical District. Southerly: Firestone Tire & Southdale; Zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Westerly: Multi -story office buildings; zoned POD -1, Planned Office District and guided RIVE" Regional Medical District. K Existing Site Features The subject property is 39,339 square feet in size, is relatively flat and. contains a two -story TCF Bank. (Seepages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: RM, Regional Medical. (See page A5.) Zoning: POD -1, Planned Office District -1. (See page A6.) Comprehensive Guide Plan /Density As mentioned, the Comprehensive Plan guides this site for RM, Regional Medical Use. The only housing allowed in that district is senior housing. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Guide Plan to allow "affordable housing" in addition to senior housing. The applicant believes that the type of housing proposed is very similar to senior housing, in that the units are very small, and they would generate very little traffic.. - . Below is the proposed language to consider for the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Affordable housing was the term recommended to use during the Sketch Plan Review: Nonresidential and Mixed Use Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines RM. Hospitals, senior housing *, Form -based design 12 -80 senior residential and Regional affordable housing; medical standards for building affordable dwelling units per acre. Medical and dental offices and clinics, placement, massing Floor to Area Ratio - Per current and laboratories for and street -level Zoning Code: maximum of 1.0 for performing medical or dental treatment. medical office uses. Density for senior research, diagnostic testing, Pedestrian circulation housing and affordable housing shall analytical or clinical work, and open space be based on proximity to hospitals, having a direct relationship to amenities should be proximity to low density uses, utilities the providing of health provided for larger capacity, level of transit service services. General office uses' sites. available, and impact on adjacent are permitted. roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below * Senior housing may include: grade parking, provision of park or independent living, assisted open space, affordable housing, living, memory care, and skilled sustainable design principles, and nursing. provision of public art. A case could be made for allowing affordable housing in this location as it would reuse an existing building (sustainability); provide a 100% affordable housing development to help the city achieve its affordable housing goals with the Metropolitan Council; be in close proximity to Metro Transit; be 41 located on a high visibility arterial roadway; and be completely separated from low density residential uses. Additionally, the unit sizes are small and they would generate very little traffic; similar;to senior housing. Allowing affordable housing as an allowed use within the entire RMD, Regional Medical District would: help- the City, of Edina in meeting its goal with the Metropolitan Council of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. However, there are differences between_the proposed project and the project that was allowed for senior housing in the RM District (6500 France). The 6500 France project is located adjacent to the hospital and will provide an,.en,elosed skyway connection to the hospital. Also, part of the facility wil be used for long term stay patients from the hospital. and Twin City.Orthopedic. Therefore, there is a direct connection to the Regional Medical District. The housing proposed by Beacon would not have a direct connection to the RM, Regional Medical District. The structure would be located several blocks from the hospital. There would not be a direct tie in to any medical use in the area. The Regional Medical Zoning District contemplates a 10 acre minimum lot size. It is intended for larger medical type:uses along with senior housing which benefits from being in close proximity to medical uses. Proposed Density of the project would be 43 units per acre; which would be Within the density range currently allowed for senior housing in the.RM, Regional Medical District. The following table demonstrates existing density ranges for high density residential development in Edina. There are a variety of housing types here, from market rate housing to senior affordable housing development. High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre * Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Dur'ham' 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 7-50 York 139 15 n * Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 * 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392. 36 • South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 • The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 69`" & York Apartments 3121 69`x' Street 114 30 * 6500 France — Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar 6725 York 240 52 Senior Housing PUD Rezoning The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this site to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to allow affordable housing on the site. (See attached .draft PUD Ordinance.) Within a PUD District, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent of the PUD. The following is compliance table that demonstrates how the proposed building would comply with the Regional Medical District standards and show residential densities in Edina. The use is currently not allowed in the existing POD -1 or RMD Zoning District. Compliance Table 5 City Standard (POD-1 Planned Office District) Proposed- Front — 66"' Street 35 feet 43 feet (existing) Front — Barrie Road 35 feet 25 feet (existing) 40 feet. (new) Side — North 20 feet 50+ feet Side — east 20 feet 25 feet Building Height 12 stories or 2 stories 5 C' l l: ** Variance Required Per Chapter 36 of the City Code the following are the regulations for a. PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The' purpose of the PUD District is to' provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended- to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the. land, use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that. exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian 6 144 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30 % 30% Floor Area Ratio .50 %Office 77 % ** (1:O RMD District) Density — Comp. Plan 12 -80 units per acre 39 units 43 units per acre Minimum Lot Size. 10 acres (RMD Standard) .9 acres No minimum in the POD District Parking Stalls 1 enclosed space per -unit 19 spaces exposed ** + guest parking (proof -of- parking for 37) 39 units ** Variance Required Per Chapter 36 of the City Code the following are the regulations for a. PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The' purpose of the PUD District is to' provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended- to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the. land, use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that. exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian 6 oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land cruses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; ff. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening, g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The project would meet some of the goals for a PUD as outline above. Those include: o Providing a development that is 100% affordable to assist in the City affordable housing goals with the Met Council. o Improve the efficiency of street by allowing a land use that would generate less traffic than the bank use; and it would eliminate the bank drive - through facility. o Would utilize sustainable design as described in the applicant narrative on page All 3. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Communities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15% energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro Transit; impervious surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special construction material; installing a rain garden for stormwater management; and pedestrian oriented design. The Comprehensive Plan allows senior housing as an allowed land use within the regional medical district. The proposed specialty housing proposal to allow another form of housing that is desirable through a PUD would fit with this site, given its close proximity to the Metro Transit Facility across 66th Street and Southdale Shopping Center. This area would provide employment opportunities VA in close proximity for residents. The site is located on an edge of the Regional Medical District and on an arterial roadway. 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. If City Council amends the Comprehensive Plan to allow affordable housing in addition to senior housing, this site would otherwise be envisioned to allow uses permitted within the Regional Medical District. The Regional Medical Zoning District contemplates a 10 acre minimum lot size. It is intended for larger medical type uses along with senior housing which benefits from being in close proximity to medical uses. The Zoning Ordinance amendment, which follows this staff report, lists the uses that would be allowed on this site. Spack Consulting did a parking analysis that determined that the proposed parking would support the uses proposed, and the traffic generated would actually be less than the previously approved medical office. (See pages A48 -Al 10.) The proposed residential development would generate 20 am peak hour trips and 24 pm peak hour trips. The existing bank generates 45 am peak hour trips and 89 pm peak hour trips. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following; 1. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (9) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposal would not include a mixture of land uses. It would include affordable housing for young adults who have experienced homelessness. Within the overall RMD, Regional Medical District, this project would introduce the potential for another use in the district, and would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. H. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned above, the proposed uses would be for housing that is all affordable. Providing affordable housing and sustainable development are goals within the Comprehensive Plan that this project would accomplish. Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives include: • Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. • Promote lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. • Variety of Buildings Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. • Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The proposed building density would be 43 units per acre and have an FAR of .77. The Floor Area Ratio contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan for Regional Medical is 1.0; however, the current POD -1 Zoning District allows an FAR of .50. The density range allowed for senior housing in the district is up to 80 units per acre. Density in the Comprehensive Plan limits senior housing to 12 -80 dwelling units per acre. Density for senior housing shall be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. 0 The site has adequate utilities capacity; would generate less traffic than an office use; would provide affordable housing; would be a sustainable development; and would take advantage of Metro Transit Availability. Staff believes the density is appropriate for this site.. iv, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The proposed project does closely relate to the already established standards in the POD -1 District, as the existing building is being utilized. Flexibility is requested in regard to parking spaces. For the reasons stated above, staff believes the purpose and intend of the PUD Ordinance is met. Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off of Barrie Road. One drive entrance would be eliminated. (See page Al 9.) Parking Per Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 4, the requirement for multi - family residential parking in a commercial area, is one enclosed space per unit plus additional guest parking as required. Therefore, at minimum a requirement of 39 stalls plus guest parking should be provided. The applicant is proposing 19 surface stalls, with a proof -of parking plan to 37 stalls. Staff has some concern in regard to potential future lack of parking. While the proposed use may be able to get by with the proposed surface parking only, any future conversion of these units for market rate housing would surely be short of parking. A stipulation in a potential PUD Ordinance would be to only allow this type of housing on the site; therefore, any conversion of the units would require a PUD Amendment. Additional parking would be required as part of any PUD Amendment. A parking study was done by Spack Consulting, which concludes that the proposed parking would support the use. (See page A56.) The total demand for parking is anticipated to be 12 spaces. 10 Traffic A traffic study was also done by Spack, which concludes that the existing roadways support the proposed uses. (See traffic study on pages A48 -Al 10.) The proposed use would generate less traffic than the existing bank on the site. The existing use generates 45 trips in the am peak hour and 889 trips in the pm peak hour. The proposed use would generate 20 trips in the am peak hour.and 24 trips in the pm peak hour. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 21 overstory trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The applicant is proposing to plant 24 overstory trees around the perimeter of the site & understory trees and shrubs. (See landscape plan on pages Al and A34 -A35.) A more detailed review of the landscape plan would be done at final development plan. Grading & Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the plans and found them generally acceptable and offered comments. (See pages A46 -A47.) A more detailed review would be done as part of the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. Signage Signage would be allowed per the requirements of the POD -1, Planned Office District within the Zoning Ordinance Amendment for the PUD. (See attached draft Ordinance.) [bike Racks The applicant is -proposing 26 bicycle parking spots and indoor bicycle storage. Outdoor racks would be located in front of the building near the main entrance off the parking lot. (Seepage A19.) PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues o Is the proposed Comprehensive Playa Amendment to allow affordable housing as a permitted use in the RM District reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 11 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the. Comprehensive Plan," and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable.housing goal with the Met Council of:providing 212 new affordable- housing units by the year 2020. This.project would include 39 new affordable housing units toward that goal. That would make up 100% of the total units in the project. 2. The proposed density of 43 units per acre is reasonable, and within the density range suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 12 -80 units ,per acre. 3. The RM District allows senior housing currently. The proposed affordable housing' project would include units that.are small in size generally similar to senior housing; and the residents within the proposed project typically do not drive, similar to senior housing. 4. The.proposed affordable housing project would generate less traffic than the existing bank facility. 5. The project would utilize sustainability principles. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011. Enterprise Green Communities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15 % energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro Transit; impervious surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special construction material; installing a rain garden .for storm water management; and pedestrian oriented design. 6. Project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is.inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and. abilities and offers a wide range of. housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. c) Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings. or building groups. d) Incorporate principles -of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. 12 However, as mentioned earlier, there are differences: between the proposed project and the project that was allowed, for senior housing in the RM District (6500 France). The 6500 France project is located adjacent to the hospital and will provide an enclosed skyway connection to the hospital., Also, part of the facility will be used for long term stay patients from the hospital and Twin City Orthopedic. Therefore, there is a direct connection to the Regional Medical District. The housing proposed by Beacon would not have a direct connection to the RM, Regional Medical District. The structure would be located several blocks from the hospital. There would not be a direct tie in to any medical use in the area. The. Regional Medical Zoning District contemplates a 10 acre minimum lot size. It is intended for larger medical type uses along with senior housing which benefits from being in close proximity to medical uses. Is the proposed rezoning to PUD appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal to rezone the site to PUD is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: The project would meet many of the goals of for a PUD as outline above. Those include: Providing a development that is 100% affordable to assist in the city affordable housing goals with the Met Council. Improve the efficiency of street by allowing -a land use that would generate less traffic than the bank use; and it would eliminate the bank drive- through facility. Would utilize sustainable design as described in the applicant narrative on page A13. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Communities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15% energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro Transit; impervious surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special construction material; installing a rain.garden for stormwater management; and pedestrian oriented design. 2. The Comprehensive Plan allows senior housing as an allowed land use within the regional medical district. The proposed, specialty housing proposal to allow another form of housing that is desirable'through a PUD would fit in well with this site, given its close proximity to the Metro Transit Facility 13 x across 66th Street and S:outhdale Shopping Center. This area could provide employment opportunity in close proximity for residents. The site is located on an edge of the Regional Medical District and on an arterial roadway. 3. The existing roadways and parking lot would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted ,a,traffiic. impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that the traffic generated from the project would not impact the adjacent driveways or intersections. In fact the proposed. uses would actually generate less.traffic than the previously approved medical building. No additional improvements other than those shown on the site plan would be required to accommodate the site redevelopment. (See traffic study on pages A48- A110.) 4. The RUD ensures that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 5. The PUD ensures that this is the only use allowed within the building. Any change in use would require an amendment to the PUD Ordinance. Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to, allow affordable housing in the RMD District. . Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 212 new afford able housing units by the year.2020. This project would include 39 new affordable housing units (100% of the projects units) toward that goal. 2. The proposed density of 43 units per acre is reasonable, and within the density, range.suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 12 -80 units per acre. 3. The RM District allows senior housing currently. The proposed affordable housing project would, include units that are small in size generally similar to senior housing and the residents within the proposed project typically do not drive, similar to`senior housing. 4. The proposed affordable housing project would generate less traffic than the existing bank facility. 14 5. The project would utilize sustainability principles. Most notable elements include: compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green Communities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15% energy savings; locating the building to make use of Metro Transit;. impervious surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced :landscaping; making use of special construction material; installing a rain garden for storm water management; and pedestrian oriented design. 6. The project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan .goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages, incomes, and abilities and offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. C) Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. d) Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of,design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -9, Planned Office District,to Planned Unit Development District & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning and approve the Preliminary Development Plan. Approval is based on the following findings: Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. This project would include 39 new affordable housing units toward that goal. 15 2. The proposed density of 43 units per acre is reasonable,' and.within the density range suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 12 -80. units per acre. 3.. The proposed affordable housing project would generate less traffic than the existing bank.facility. 4. The project would utilize sustainability principles. Most notable elements include:; compliance with Minnesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterprise Green. Communities Criteria; utilizing the existing building rather than a tear down; committing to a 15% energy savings; locating thebuilding to make use.:of -Metro Transit; impervious surface would be reduced by 6.9 %; enhanced landscaping; making use of special construction material installing a rain garden for storm water management; and pedestrian oriented design. 5. Project would meet the following additional. Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Promotion of a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide range of ages,, incomes, and abilities and .offers a wide range of housing options for Edina residents. b) Promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstance at all stages of life. c) Encourage an integrated mix of building type, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. d) Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. Preliminary approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 20, 2014. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative-within the Planning Commission staff report. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 16 j 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 15, 2014. (See pages A46 -A47.) 5. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 8. Final Rezoning.is subject to review and approval of the Metropolitan Council on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Deadline for a city decision: October 15, 2014 17 ORDINANCE NO. 2014- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD -7; PLANNED" UNIT DEVELOPMENT -7 DISTRICT AT 3330 66" STREET The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to rezone the below described property to PUD, Planned Unit Development in accordance with the following: Sec. 36 -494 Planned Unit Development District -7 (PUD -7) — 66, TH West Apartments (a) Legal description: The South 300 feet of Lot 2, as measured along the West line of said lot from the Southwest corner thereof in Block 3, Southdale.Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Certificate of Title No: 361393. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re- development plans received by the City on June , 2014 except as amended. by City Council. Resolution No. 2014 -_, on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: Affordable housing as proposed and described by Beacon Interfaith Housing collaborative in their project description on file in the Office of the Planning Department. Any change in use of the site will require an amendment to this PUD -7 Ordinance. (d) Accessory Uses: None (e) Conditional Uses: None (f) Development Standards. Development standards per the POD -1 Zoning District, except the following: Building Setbacks Front —66th 43 feet Street 25 feet Front - Barrie Road 50 feet 25 feet Side — North Rear—South Building Height 2 stories Maximum Floor .77% Area Ratio (FAR) Building 30% Coverage Parking Stalls 19 surface Proof -of- parking for 37 (g) Signs shall be allowed per the POD -1 standards in Sec.�36 -1714. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon Met Council review and decision on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: 2 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk. James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing,Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk 3 1 _ Raslarxi Park - I . - 1 -TH STkEEf B iSi Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N 'Q ,. ID: .. Print Date: 4/17/2014 Owner Twin City Fed Sav Market Name: Total: Parcel 3330 66Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 -r-71H -�- - Property Type; Commercial-Preferred Sale Price: This map is a compilation of data from various !i4APET'0:CST sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Non- Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular stead: *9m 4(t;. purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. 7� 0.9 acres Sale Lh F,G i?i7 tGl Area: 39,339 sq ft Code: 41 SEAT �• A 11 ink Greed! M I r .` GSTH. TTEE1 oF�T '♦ .. . ' r • .`. I � ,. �PamtlBPark' Yom.' . M .., _ C•lW 6T.F.gY �' 1 �' _, > Irnt_I�ctr Fcx Zz q i 1 _ j eYliH- STFcE( :Cr � � T+- 1 Z - -• -° ) 1?2 Si FEETCi ES7 Z 1 ... .' 71ST -1 FAT YFiI I T Si FSET LC EST �. . ' 3 wun. I r=aEn ! i' e3 . 71 1 ° ♦IFFET iS'Tir ' :r ` is d ltEE(e EST �•: - _ 1 r t , v 11. .. I .3 -, � � • IItiFJ In�1 �••.1L "I: o� a :..�. �-. . _ ., . T1H -,iFAtT r E51 ° I 2 : ,y I4 11I M".I W ViT 1 _ Raslarxi Park - I . - 1 -TH STkEEf B iSi Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N 'Q A -T -B: ID: Print Date: 4/17/2014 Owner Twin City Fed Sav Market Name: Total: Parcel 3330 66Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 -r-71H -�- - Property Type; Commercial-Preferred Sale Price: This map is a compilation of data from various !i4APET'0:CST sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Non- Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular stead: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. 7� 0.9 acres Sale Lh F,G i?i7 tGl Area: 39,339 sq ft Code: -_ A 11 ink Greed! M r .` GSTH. TTEE1 oF�T '♦ .. . ' r • .`. I � i _ _ } O 3 a- Yom.' . M .., _ C•lW 6T.F.gY � WNF 1 _ i 1 j eYliH- STFcE( :Cr � � T+- 1 Z - -• -° ) 1?2 Si FEETCi ES7 Z 1 ... .' 71ST -1 FAT YFiI I T Si FSET LC EST �. . ' 3 wun. I r=aEn ! i' e3 . 71 1 ° ♦IFFET iS'Tir is d ltEE(e EST �•: Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N 29-028-24-24-0030 A -T -B: ID: Print Date: 4/17/2014 Owner Twin City Fed Sav Market Name: Total: Parcel 3330 66Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Type; Commercial-Preferred Sale Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Non- Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular stead: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.9 acres Sale COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 Area: 39,339 sq ft Code: A 11 ink Greed! MR BMW _I r MaL II , f i r ARM a' ka L � 11L C ~ �°• f .e.�y '`,'•' I'.' ''i1Ff p y r' RU OF Lvi t +- ;s - =:Y t• �`�r.� e � .3250 tt _ i Fr�t'M1 ='Fri Iv h V. kv-] rE+'!11` _ -f la C {T_Iil STREETtrrEST _ — r n ' t D e a t � 411712014 - �j-� -- n . Owner Name: Twin City Fed Sav Parcel 3330 66Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial- Preferred Type: Home- Non - Homestead stead: Parcel 0.9 acres Area: 39,339 sq ft +larket Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: )V ;L, is map is a compilation of data from various urces and is furnished "AS IS" with no xesentation or warranty expressed or plied, including fitness of any particular rpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and mpleteness of the information shown. >PYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Wr,:tiGreen! N, i X X ; r; _1425 ; k I R t1 i i f � ���UTHDAIE CEiITFR f Parcel 2 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft . / 29- 028 -24 -24 -0030 A A -T_g: M /N ID: P P n n . Owner Name: Twin City Fed Sav Parcel 3330 66Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial- Preferred Type: Home- Non - Homestead stead: Parcel 0.9 acres Area: 39,339 sq ft +larket Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: )V ;L, is map is a compilation of data from various urces and is furnished "AS IS" with no xesentation or warranty expressed or plied, including fitness of any particular rpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and mpleteness of the information shown. >PYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Wr,:tiGreen! Googte earth feet __- meters - X90 P O e f r ..,for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan t� G City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Date of Aerial Photography: August 2006 Figure 4.4 Conceptual Land Use Framework: Potential Areas of Change rZizr-1 0 0s naazs Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design At 4 -33 Future Land Use Flan with r City of Edina Building Heights ` ! igu Comprehensive Platt Update Southeast Figu Quadrant 2068 ��� � re 4.6B Data Source: URS p 0.5 Miles }Es S� }L i 44TH & FRANCE DETAIL qFE UPPER 50TH & FRANCE DETAIL 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL Legend R-1 Single Dwelling Unk Did- R-2 D.b1. dwelling UnjjDist. PRD-1 Planned Residence Did. City Wilding, PR D-2 PRE-3 SC ed PRD-4 nO-1 Planned C—nnene.1 ML n134 POM Panned office Dist. F01�2 RMD Regional Medal Did. PID Pl.—dlnduI,iAML PUD Plmmee Unit Dist. APD Automobile i,eWng DW, -L. PSR4 Planned Senior Citizen Dist hl[) 4 t4xed De d,pnn,nt Dd. w E + MD�s MDD6 3 NovlanheR 2012' VALLEY VIEW& WOODDALE DETAIL SOUTHDALE DETAIL zoN1uG A� � 11 e- Omzinla I -Jiy da fin M. 50TH & FRANCE DETAIL �,..: � ',d::ti •{ ':�; to .. U LL 0-1 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL AN W 54 FULLERS LL Legend -- HOD -2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less. HOD -3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less. HOD -4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 4 stories or,48 feet, whichever is less. HO D_8 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, whichever is less. HOD -9 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 9 stories or x;08 feet, whichever is less. HO D-1 O Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less. Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, HOD-12 but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less. � Church City Buildings N _ Private School W +E S - P15nriin`g0ept A Public School December, 2013 VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DETAIL u > w w > 0 6 � z W . -. O ¢ Y Lt' J ' t 0 fAIL' L::i...; .... O m �1 !V! W 62ND 1 Z. "i miry i _mow �f. `ten Omzinla I -Jiy da fin M. 50TH & FRANCE DETAIL �,..: � ',d::ti •{ ':�; to .. U LL 0-1 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL AN W 54 FULLERS LL Legend -- HOD -2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less. HOD -3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less. HOD -4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 4 stories or,48 feet, whichever is less. HO D_8 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, whichever is less. HOD -9 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 9 stories or x;08 feet, whichever is less. HO D-1 O Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less. Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, HOD-12 but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less. � Church City Buildings N _ Private School W +E S - P15nriin`g0ept A Public School December, 2013 VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DETAIL u > w w > 0 6 � z W . -. O ¢ Y J�,�^:•�`(r.. -.. J i 0 L::i...; .... O m W 62ND 1 Z. O Nm Oy O S: 4 �l 3— 1 meux. � NORTH — Iv, qx Ei.iEs pmE;xpvax°w= UeA auM. nEsNermV n .— EB 8 0 1800 FT 3600 FT 4; �s✓i m[[ ue[ en v , - —T 1. 1. 11 Ill. I IT. 17 AIL gI 1.4 u— z n�. 4 41. Bl- R \\jv x „uLLSDII e _ R R0. olnd�evd � � b--. �x= f— %'vt z ? � -°�` �RbCC Vyaf� upp'mR A�app $ J 1 p� .11. IT. J. I UE , z� — 4�2 Fm, -, g IT. �11 Ll 71. DMEY HELL ft 11- IT. 17 Nrne 16 'A0 v 52 10, us .111 IT V! IT. nn .. ... ... ..... . . .. ..... Principal Arterial - "A” Minor Arterial "A" Minor Arterial "B" Minor Arterial Collector (Reliever) (Augmenter) City of Edina Roadway Functional Classification 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update . ..... .. Figure 7.5 4 333066 Ih Street, Edina Explanation of Regciest and Description of Project Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon) is seeking an amendment to the coin E,rehensive plan, ptelintinary, zoning approval to PUD and preliniunaiy'developmerit approval at 3330 66`' Street. Beacon builds high quality, affordable housing for families and individuals: We believe housing. is the. foundation for people to create the stability and security we all seek, We believe that well- designed, professionally managed buildings create a win -win for communities and tenants. We believe everyone . deserves to have choices in housing. We believe in home. Out development projects are usuaily undertaken with partners and collaborators in the faith communities. When I a congregation has identified a desire to. create, affordable housing and the capacity to embark on a development project, our staff, with their specialized expertise, collaborate with congregational leaders to make the vision a reality. This model, over our 15 year history, has resulted in the creation of nearly 500 homes. In partnership with Edina Community Lutheran Church, Beacon has entered into a purchase agreement with the owners at 3330 66 Street West and intends to convert the existing building into a residential apartment Building, x`66 West Apartments," that will provide 39 units of -permanent housing for young adults who Have experienced homelessness. We plan to seek. Rinding.fr•om 1Vlunnesota Housing; Hennepin County and several private fiind ng sources to make the units affordable to homeless young adults between the ages of 18 and 22.66 West Apartment's units meet the Met Council definition of affordable rental housing according to the Livable Communities ,oat Construction of these units will apply towards the City's Met Cduncil goal of creating 212 additional affordable housing units in Edina between 2011 and 2020. See the separate attachment detailing the project fatidung structure. 66 West is supportive, affordable housing for young_ adults who have experienced homelessness. The goal is to support the tenants as they learn to live independently and develop their skills to be financially iirdependent— thereby ending the_cycle of homelessness. The building will be staffed by specialists serving homeless young adults'... Our supportive service approach is also designed to create a sense of belonging and place for residents and to foster healthy relationships between youth and caring adults with professional training and skills. The outcome is that that coinrmrnity creates an engaging, safe "Home" environment with ample opportunities for youth to access on -site or in the broader community. Site and Development. Description The project site is bounded by West 66'x' Street to the South, Barrie Road to tine west, and office buildings to the east and north. The site is currently zoned POD and contains a two -story building with a basement. The first floor is being used as a bailk with a drive through facility. The remaining floors are not being. used. The building will contain housing units, as well as office and resident amenities. The building will feature 39 studio units, ranging in size from a net (paint to paint) 322-square. feet to 451 square feet. Each apartment will contain a frill kitchen and bathroom. The building Will contain offices for our -site service providers and property management. There will be a community area for residents, as well as a fitness area, computer lab and laundry room. The site is .9 acres. The project incorporates the entire existing 18,145 square foot building and also R' includes a 10,458 square foot addition. The remodeled building, with the addition, Will Have an l 1�i square, foot building footprint and a total floor area of 28,603 square feet. The building will reliohitiwo stories, plus the existing basement. The design retains the brick on the existing building. r4 eeted �`�� exterior materials on the addition will be brick and metal panels. The updated exterior will complement the sili•i•ounding buildings. The site features two outdoor courtyards and a basketball court as resideirt amenities. The project retains most of the mature trees on the site. Additional garden areas and ornamental trees, including a rain garden, further enhance the existing landscaping: Plantings and a tree for shade will improve the existing bus stop area, turrently just a bench. Additional pedestrian walkways to the public sidewalk are planned. Sustainability. Currently, the building use is limited to one of the three floors due to parking i•equ d•eirient& This p:e9ject maximizes the potential of the .9 acres by repurposing the entire existing building and adding an addition. The development reduces the impervious paving of the site by 6.9%. Beacon delivers buildings that are environmentally sustainable in d'etiga and operation. 66 West will incorporate marry sustainable building elements, outlined in the attachment. Porldng, traffic and transit. The primary entrance is accessed off Barrie Road. The parking lot, as designed, has 19 parking stalls. Landscaping along Barrie Road could be removed and the parking. lot expanded to accommodate an additional 12 spots, should a future user t., quire additional, parking, Tit addition, there is a paved, unstriped area; currently designed as a basketball court; in which d additional spots could be added with minimal site disruption. Thus, the site could contain a total of 37 parl(hig stalls for a futiue use. Beacon has provided funding so that the City of Edina could conduct a parking study to verify the parking needs and determine the impact oil traffic. Beacon believes 19 parking spots would be sufficient to serve the residents; guests and staff. The independent parking study found that in other Beacon buildings that serve a similar population, the rate of parked cars to apartments range between 18% and 306/o. hi the most similar building serving young adults, the rate of parked cars, at. its peak; was 18 %: Thus, conservatively, Beacon would expect no more. tlian 12 parking stalls will be required for residents. In addition; the building has offices for a maximum of 6 staff. There will be no facility vehicles requiring a parking stall. In addition, the project site is located across the street from the Southdale transit hub served by nine bus routes. Also, two high frequency bus routes stop inunediately adjacent to the property — route 6 to Downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota and route 515 to Richfield and Bloomington. Thus, it is expected all residents care utilize public transportation, reducing the dependency on cars. We would also expect that future uses would also take advantage of the proximity to public transportation. Finally, the project includes 26 bicycle parking spots and indoor bicycle storage. The Requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and PUD Rezoning are Consistency with Edina's Land Use and Housing Goals and Policies The site is located in an area designated in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan) as Regional Medical. The Regional Medical category was recently amended to allow senior housing as an allowed land use. We are requesting that the Comprehensive Plan be similarly amended to add "affordable housing I as an allowed land use in the Regional Medical land use category. We are also applying to rezone the site to Planned Unit .Development (PUD), which permits the establishment of rises allowed under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment and rezoning are consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, file Greater Southdale Area Final Land Use and Transportat, n Study Report (Report), and objectives of the City's Zoning Code. ^@ Policies and Objectives for the Greater Southdale Area. The Report states in flip, sion th the "Greater Southdale Area is a place for people to live, work, Play and shop." Tj§;.11%e are a®`i vibrant mix of housing, jobs, commerce, health care, and entertainment." "Develo lf•in ti titer S� ` Me Area can meet the housing needs of Edina with options that may not fit in other loca$ ilPlrswit1irii,,� ty . " (Page 3). The Land Use Plan, as outlined in the Report, "advocates a strong component of mixed -use . in the Southdale Area .... This approach has been taken in order to flexibly address future market . opportunities and to balance traffic generation by mixing land use types and their resulting peak hour traffic characteristics." (page 32). The parcel; 3330 66111 Street West, is slated as "mixed use' in the final Land Use Plan Concept in the report. (page 33). Dire to the importance of the Greater Southdale Area to the City's vitality and welfare, the City Council adopted additional development objectives regarding the Area into the Zoning Code; including the following that specifically support the requested comprehe►isive plan amendment and PUD rezoning: (2) To encourage a range of housing types within the Greater Southdale Area. (3) To encourage a mixed use shopping, living and working environment that meets the needs of residents and visitors and helps mitigate the effects of traffic by reducing vehicle trips and miles by allowing residences in close proximity to employment and services. (8) To allow a density of development that improves the feasibility of mass trans_ it services utilized by residents, shoppers and employees of the Greater Southdale Area. (9) To provide incentives to encourage affordable and life cycle housing. Eduia Zoning Code, Section 36 -5. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Policies. The Comprehensive Plan, which postdates the Report; identifies the project site as Regional Medical. However, it also identifies the Southdale Area as a "potential area of change." Thus, the plan acknowledges that Southdale appears to be an area "where change may occur during the life of this Plan." (Page 4 -30). The Potential Areas of Change were identified "as suitable areas to accommodate additional households and jobs... Because the City is fully developed, additional housing would have to occur through redevelopment" (Page 4 -31). In addition, the .proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning are supported by the following specific Land Use Policies within the Plan: 1. The City will endeavor to accommodate private redevelopment in the Greater Southdale Area . 5. In reviewing development proposals, the City will examine how land use and transportation are integrated to ensure that new development and redevelopment expands rlon- motorized travel options. 7. The City will seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing. 8: The City will grow and develop in a sustainable ►nanner ... . Comprehensive Plan (Page 4 -34). Similarly, an amendment to allow affordable housing in the Regional Medical area is s► of d by the following goal from the Housing Chapter of the Comprelensive Plan: 0 • r • ,J i . 3. Encourage the production of additional affordable housing unisliitieet tli Gds housing needs and, at a minimum, its Metropolitan Council affordable 41A,ing ne�.44* %datiorl�.ft units), v t �I 5. Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a wide mange of ages,,.incomes, and abilities and offers a wide Lange of housing options for Edina's residents. 7. Promote lifecycle housing. to support arange of housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all stages of life. 8. Acknowledge the interrelationship between land use and transportation, and supportthe expansion of existing transportation infrastructure- capacity through. wise land use. Comprehensive Plan (Pages 5 -17 to 5 -18). The proposed plan amendment and PUD rezoning are highly consistent with the City's housing goals, as one of the purposes of the PUD is to encourage a -variety of housing types, including affordable housing. As described above, allowing affordable housing in the Regional Medical category is supported by multiple policies related to land me and housing in the City's plans and zoning code. Further, the, proposed project will be an enhancement to the site and surrounding area and will not hinder other goals for development in the Regional Medical area. The site is located bn the edge of the district. Development opportunities exist at underutilized sites to the North and the East. The project repurposes an existing building, maximizes the potential of the .9 acre site as additional parking would be required for additional housing units or commercial space, and convea•ts a auto - oriented drive- through commercial use into transit - oriented housing use. In addition, adding affordable housing as an allowed use is not dissimilar to the senior housing currently allowed in the Regional Medical category. This supportive housing project contains similar unit sizes, staff space, and common space to a typical senior housing or assisted living facility. The proposed 43 units per acre density is in the middle of the 12 -80 unit density suggested fob• the Regional Medical area, Tine addition of residents will support the diversity of uses, :employment base, and transit service in the Greater Southdale Area and the residents of this project will be well- served by those amenities and opportunities: 1f[ 2. 66 West Sustainable Elements In order to create homes that are durable, healthy and efficient, Minnesota Housing require all funded projects to comply with the Miiuiesota Overlay and Guide to the 2011 Enterpi ise Green Communities Criteria. This guide outlines mandatory and optional sustainable building criteria to include in the project. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon) has committed to implement certain criteria and incorporated the elements or strategies into the building design, The document providing the written commitment is attached. In addition, at the financial closing, Beacon will reaffirm the commitment and certify the building criteria that were included in the consti-action doeiunents. Finally, upon constrLiction completion, Beacom, the architect, and the. general contractor will certify that the elements and strategies were incorporated into the final building. Energy modeling and performance test results are also required to verify energy standard criteria. Below are siginificant strategies of elements that will be included in 66 West through the Green Coininunities program. See the attached certification for a complete list. ® 66 West is a compact development, with 43 13 units per acre. 66 West is within walking distance of many services and Facilities. • The project site is adjacent to public transit stop that totaling neatly 160 stops per day. • 66 West is aii adaptive reuse of an existing building. • At least 50% of the planting will be native species. • The building will have a HERS (home energy rating system) index of at least 85, which is at least 15% more energy efficient than a HERS reference home and consistent with Energy Star compliant homes. • 66 West will install only Energy Star rated appliances and light fixtures. • All of the project's interior paints, primers, and adhesives will meet low VOC standards. • 66. West will install Energy Star, continuous running bait oorn fans exhausted directly to the outdoors. In addition, 66 West will feature the following Green Building strategies. • 66 West will reduce the impervious paving of the existing site by 6.9 %. • The building will feature hard surface flooring in the units. • The pfoject'site will include a rain garden. M O,L t ° • N ^\ 7j �v M Project Name 66 West Apartments ftapfration Name Boacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Project Address ^^ 333066th Street W Organiaal'ion ContestY Sarah Larson Project Stafus' Application Date 5)13/2014 J` METHODS WORKSHEET[ This worksheet identifies how the project learn Infend4 to fricorporate all the Mandatory and adequate number O.Ptlonal Criteria into the' development. worksheet must be flied out and submitted before the conswnlonstathdale. Foraddlfronal information on hose to submOgo to tvvnv greerstaomunbksonMe org/toollJcenifiollon/ Weil on answer provided In the drgp -down menu under Column D ( "How Criterion will be Implemented ") for eadl criterion. Explalp special circumstances or request a waiver using Column E ("If necdssa_ describe de47atlons from Intended approach "). This may include Information on an approach proposed by the projectteam that does not appear as an'optfon fh a drop -down menu. Indfatq where the Criterion references can bra found within the projectdocumenls in Column Find G ( "Criteria Dodimentatfor '). This Krequired for Critledon 1.1b Indlcate the project team member who is responsible for documenting and ensuring the completion of the tritedoon under Columit'W ( Champion). Indicate the number of optional points being pursued by'compfeting Column H ( "Intended Points 1. cell. Complete this document by signing the Green Development Agreement at the bottom of this worksheet. Without the mandatory signatures, this document remains incomplete and the project will not recieve Step 1 Certification. If necessa ry, provide additional Criterla Documentation Ctitoria Item How Criterion will be implemented iniormalionoresplanalion ofallnna live Champion Intended Points approach lometing lMs measure - Local. Measure In Spec page number / plan ect Documents type for locating measure Site Sensitiveseleclion(New Sltefa padoudydeadoped and wigoolbeon pimesofis. onpubile Criteria Documentation 2.1 If necessary, provide aJditlonal NIA Lae.ioih of Spec number /plan 07teria ttem How Criterion will be Implemented information a e'aplanatidn of alternative Champion Intended Points approach lomeeiing this measure ProJectOocuments umerils; for le type forloralingmeasure 1.14 Q rus Development Plan: The prohK in. Is. conducted onewmoce Integrative desfgnanaft(s) Devdopmerat and N/A Architect ' M latgatfve Dedipobeeating(s) submitted 4 Gsesen Development Men se egalrsieatdocwseotahore Inlrasuunure fNeur The prokct Is located on a.11. with — toeabllpg mods• sates, sewers, �rnOevel lP{as prabd suite will create deslgn and construction doamnenlathn 0& Canrtroatlon only. esce4t %w Pr jeclpan.and 1]b Oiteda Docrosetalatin0 - pllarm detaftised apeaT®Gons) luktdhdehdomalfmron fuphroenWon orappopdale FaterpoeGreer CunommitiesfAlerfa 2.2 p lorotedlonud Specifications TOD Architect M 1.2a Universal Desgn [New M ball,. tdbdlandy lncdordpr grid. and meeting The salute tank requirements 0 coast —lion ody) cmrrrmrddey or frs 1:26 Universal Design 15ubstandal osa m"Ou-aifpop.Nd- & INoderate Rehob only) less Chop 1ltoop) 0 0 C1' L3 Corrrpact DevebPnhenl /New Intended Points If necessa ry, provide additional Criterla Documentation Ctitoria Item How Criterion will be implemented iniormalionoresplanalion ofallnna live Champion Intended Points approach lometing lMs measure - Local. Measure In Spec page number / plan ect Documents type for locating measure Site Sensitiveseleclion(New Sltefa padoudydeadoped and wigoolbeon pimesofis. onpubile 2.1 parkland, ancri6ol habitat. on the 20Oye arfloadplah%-9.. dope great- NIA Pi JectManage, M Constm-don Clary) than 19% Connections to Fiis6ng Devdopmerat and Inlrasuunure fNeur The prokct Is located on a.11. with — toeabllpg mods• sates, sewers, Canrtroatlon only. esce4t %w and otherinkashuaam o0hinoicantiguaus )having of has125 %of the 2.2 p lorotedlonud pnrmrrderbordeAngj to gtsGlrg developtent, connected lo the pedestrian N/A PraJeciManagv M ball,. tdbdlandy lncdordpr grid. and meeting The salute tank requirements cmrrrmrddey or frs osa m"Ou-aifpop.Nd- less Chop 1ltoop) C1' L3 Corrrpact DevebPnhenl /New 4333 unitr/acre N/A Project Manager M C=1 on Onl 2.4 Compact Development 43:33 units /acre 6 2S Prosirnllylo seMres Was, SubWhan/Mld- AseTownlooOon: Project is O5- miecalkdlslanceofat least [onswnfony three. or . 1— flewalk distance of et least d. faoTilies N/A Protect Manager M 2.6 Prcservadonofand Accesslo prone anf ywa The ctia olasified asanlhh Srra0r5t Subwban /Mid- STreTawn NIA Protect Manager M en spate Preservatlon of and Access to ' 2.7 Open Space crj'' ,asr 0 Transport Public Route6 has over 90 transit rides per Weekday and ROute SIS has nearly70 c�• ',`ss Ig transit rides per weekday. Both have nearly as many rides on the weekend.A Transportation slop that serves boih routes is direcliyin front ofthe building, el";t •101, Walkable Neighborhoods: 7.9 Connections to Surrounding Provide summary of the project's sidewalk and pathway connections to �\ \ n,Q.� � 0 Neighborhood public spaces, open spaces or adjacent development Smart Sit. location: Passive 2.10 Provide a tiriel narrative that describe passive solar heaHng/coo6nC tactic[ 4 -'j • ?• 0 solar Heating /COOiing T, 211 11rovrn0eld of Adaptive Reuse The project is located an an adaptive reuse site 2 S'te 0 242 Access to Fresb, local Foods Ciiterla Documentation 0 LEED for fielghbe,haod If neceMa ry, proyfde additional Locailan of Measure In Spec page numher /plan 2.13 ' Development certification How Criterion grill be implemented Infornm1fonoreaplamauon ofaltemallve Champion intended Points 0 approach to meeting this measure 13 type for locating measure intended Points Cderh Docmnemallon If necessary,provide addi[ional� Criteria Item Now Criterion will he Implemented inrormation or ei�latatfon ofalternalive Champion Intended Points approach to meeting this measure Location ofMeasure in Spec page numher /plan Project Documents type for locating measure 47 Y/pleeCansevirg Folurec 42 Advanced Water- Conserving Appliances and Fixtures 4.3 Water Reuse ".!aMosend I -TBD I Qrchilkt specloalioas Ciiterla Documentation If neceMa ry, proyfde additional Locailan of Measure In Spec page numher /plan Criteria Item How Criterion grill be implemented Infornm1fonoreaplamauon ofaltemallve Champion intended Points approach to meeting this measure ProJecl Documents type for locating measure 3.1 Environmental Bemediafion SRehaspaned PhazelEnvlronmerrM SlleAsseorrtenl Project Pladsond Spe catlanc TBD PraJect Manager M Erosion and5edlmenta0on The prefect b not simle• tam1yarmrdOdamily (doeestodesorfenerJ new N/A 32. Cenwl(Esrepl /o/Mlglsfres TheprpJectlsankfill nle avithabulldaMearea amalerthanmreaore N/A Project Manager M wills buildable area smaDer lbo t one ove) 13 towlmpactDevelopmenl esvCa Inr,tion Theprq'ectlssubshnUalwrr ddaatecehib N/A Project Manager M 5.16 Standard: Multifamily, 4 1heAfddtKt ortandsapeA fdke lvdupmvlde ®Alfkd hceasplaotOsl Project Plansend N/A M 3A landsapint shoartngalleast W. olshe ate areaagairmk kihadseaping isplardedvdm �' + TBD Architect M Construction Only) aatioeasadapliae Weald - Sptdfiallotu Eflicleol lydgaCmn aodWater TheffittIonsyaepcaillhmorporate a ddp sysl ®lor otk.45AMorlhe \ �� r Project Pfansand 35 Berrse pkaeugbeds, sepawtemrseskapafaod hod ;aCrmesthat actiotes0se - ms TBD Archllep M S.Te MuW1amI1Y,3slories or valves (w each zone toped mpreand waste los; andp ain defayaeseor. q.^ _ 4° :. `• specifialt rr lOD Engineer M lewer(sulistondaland Procddea hrid namithe of lheddCa strateglesandrysteozlhal sviD be c� - • ., Surface Stormsrater 3.6 F7 Implorrentodabd indiaterhe calndYed wlumeofrpter bring retained, 0 Management imrilir.ld. or harvested ao site Standard: Multilafft 4 0 jntentled Points Cderh Docmnemallon If necessary,provide addi[ional� Criteria Item Now Criterion will he Implemented inrormation or ei�latatfon ofalternalive Champion Intended Points approach to meeting this measure Location ofMeasure in Spec page numher /plan Project Documents type for locating measure 47 Y/pleeCansevirg Folurec 42 Advanced Water- Conserving Appliances and Fixtures 4.3 Water Reuse ".!aMosend I -TBD I Qrchilkt specloalioas Criteria Documentation If necessary, prpvlde additional Locallonof Aleasurein Spec page number/ plan Criteria Item How Criterion will be implemented Information or esplanatfen of alternative Champion Intended Points approach to meeting this measure Project Documents type for locating measure BundleS Performance Standard: Single Fn* & Multifamily, The prefect b not simle• tam1yarmrdOdamily (doeestodesorfenerJ new N/A S.2a 3 stories or censlra6en - M lean'(NnvC dructlon geld Bullding Peromsence 5.16 Standard: Multifamily, 4 Theprajedis nollbullHamTyJfom sloiksorroore)nacvmm[ructlms N/A M sladesor MselNew �' + Construction Only) Building Perhnnance \ �� r Standard: Sleek rauft & The PCMeaal4demonzaaleenesgyPNFormanmoto NERS lndeioFBSustng flakit Plans and MethSnlnl S.Te MuW1amI1Y,3slories or anene=modelanda Nome EnegyRaungceuRcrie q.^ _ 4° :. `• specifialt rr lOD Engineer M lewer(sulistondaland c� - • ., Moderate Rehab) Building Portormance Standard: Multilafft 4 ThepraJea is not a mohifam0y frmr stories or morel reMhibsallon N/A M ,ds,2d _- stones or more(Subrtondol - andAfederatenehab) �." Additional Reductions in 5.2 Energy Use 0 Shm aftfeaudgand Coohng Heatinga ndadMgequtpmenlvallbeshedinacewdanmvihhdw ACCA ProJecl Wansand .MD Mechanical 53 Equipment and Ducts ma at Parts) and Siar ASHRAE handbooks Speifiollosu Engineer SA ENERGYSTARApp0aoces The plajecl will Inslau Enegyslal -mLed piothesviadret% dhhavadser% and Project Nan. and TBD AfdriteTt M I&IS otors Sperifiolions Efficient Ughling: Interior S5. Prolecl sWllmdall EnerryStarAdvanced Lighting Packager Protect Plans and Too Electrical E Ineer M Units Allcomposde wood productsvr0l be compliant with California 9 1120 S eclficallans Efficient Lighting: Common ., _ Arearand Emeigency Protect will use ENERGY SfAq- labeled Futures, lEDc,lg Mures vdth Protect Plansand SSb elecbonlc balluts or6etle,or anV aqulwlenthlgh •pedomuna llghling Specifications TOO FlMdol Engineer M U¢Mlrrg all mullJimlN 1... -.xY.. - RsNretand halbf In all mmmoripreSe • ecn gronndconnecledffow. Arryorpot products will meet Green label or Green �• Ploject Pleasant! TBD Architect _ - ' Project willhldall ENERGY VAR qualified nxturasor LEDs (with aminimum , Protect Plansand h�rr� , SSc EfRdanl Lightingi Ealedor ellkigro1451imenr /iraRlegblp�edwith dayllghtsinsorsons.11 -11door m Specifications ThD Electrical Engineer M IbhtEsg v sv EleatrlalYMeter(New - .. PmJed Plansand .. - . S.G. CirirhaNnn andiubsmptld IndhAdaal or submelensWll be Installed In all dwelling units Specifications ThD Electrical Engineer M Rehobnn Il s 5.66 Electricity Melei(Moderoto The project Is new construction or substantial rehab P ed P�ahsadd TBO Mechanlcal 0 Reholx only) exhaust to outdoors operate continuously at 20 cfm S Junta Engineer Exhaust Fans: Bathroom 746 Moderate Rehab only) 0 Exhaust Fans: l0lrhen(Nen, Propidobrief 6I,milve descfibing she types of,aneswable ede}gy iyMim Prolecl Pansand TOD Mechanical M 5.7a Renesiablo {netgy insmlicd andlhe ealmaleil peicenlage of energyil still pravlde for the overall Spedficationr Engineer 0 Rehab only) energy demand of the pr jot El;ofovallalc /Solar Hot 0 5.76 Watts Ready Advanced Metering 6. 5.8 hifrasauctura 0 Irtended Points Criteria Documentation If necessary, provide addilionat Criteria Item How.0heriomWil balmplemented Information or explem0on afalte .tir. ' "measure Champion location of Measure fn Spec pa¢enuinbel /plan Intended Points approach tp meeting this PiajeclDOiymenfs type forWitingmeasure low 16o110CFebasand Micaralcorpabibrand pdmmvdU meet the MPl and eases Sul standards for Psoleciplarisand TOD Architect M M1 pfimm basedaq are 8drovidd bslbeCritabs SpedOalions Ev er/No VOCAdlulmand 6.1 Alladhedea A®rpbrsaBhRale 116B.M.Soolh GoatAlrQuaiilsr Management UldrIct Ataaitand xahafssnimsrnpM1 ®Oh Regulation IL ryoJectPlansand TBD Ardinea M Smiamt noleSl o/theBayAeaft Geaft Mamgssar -2 1alirct (BAAQMD) Spci.aduca; pmjeASmpevelilt ialeaprorldmbr Fall wscomdrncilmsosle projesPbnsivd C �1fPU� 6J planihataudmesmouthpa11mt Mi stilirhWngdebdstan Spiscificadoors TOD GeoealConuaclor M Mara¢aoenl craved delnts la Prosdde a bdefnaralive that lists the materials in the Construction Warta Caaslrodion Waste slm'tien West. 6.4 Management Plan, the %recycled, salvaged or diverted and the suategles to 0 tvla optional doss Rucycling Storage far The pre: will provide a dedicated, permanent, and accessible area for the S 6.5 Multifamily Project collection and slorage ofmaterlals for recycling ProOde a brief narrative &.1summaiizes the building materials made of 0 6.6 Recycled Content Malerlal recyc ad content material 6.7 Regional Material Selection 0 6.9 Certified, Salvaged and 0 Engineered Wood Products Reducing Heat,- Island Effect: 0 690 Rmfrr Reducing i(eal- Island Effect 0 6.91, Paving 3 Intended Paints Criteria Documentation IF necessary, provido additional Criteria Item flow Criterfonsvill be irpplemenled information or explanation of altemativc Champion Intended Paints approach to meeting this measure location of Measure In Spec for lenunA meplan Protecl0ocumenls type for loceling meacuro CmrrpmttaVlood Products Prolecl Plansand '�• 70q Architect M 7.1 that Endrlasv /No Allcomposde wood productsvr0l be compliant with California 9 1120 Specifications Formaldehyde Amissm rt: pad andadheshevWO not be Insra0ed In en"vay; laundry rims,hadr ni% Mldrent Aimmencites,utBlrymom;manymomaof • Ecorbanmentally Preferable gronndconnecledffow. Arryorpot products will meet Green label or Green �• Ploject Pleasant! TBD Architect M 71 Flooring Label Pfui cesli6catiomAnyhard surface flowing products Mll be either , Spednradons h�rr� rrcamh:iDpcarOrdshedharrimad Ova; orincamp0ancesWth she m FloorSmraprogranafteda v sv ', a Environmentally Preferable _ Fs' i 0 7.3 Flooring! Alternative Sources Il s EShamt Few: Baduoorr' The proj ect vA lnslall ENERGTSTAR4abeled continuous bathroom fans that P ed P�ahsadd TBO Mechanlcal M 7Aa (Nero [onswr[ion and Substonlid Rehobon exhaust to outdoors operate continuously at 20 cfm S Junta Engineer Exhaust Fans: Bathroom 746 Moderate Rehab only) 0 Exhaust Fans: l0lrhen(Nen, The projedwOl lmu0 powewrenledf ans or range hoods that exhaust to the Prolecl Pansand TOD Mechanical M 7.Sa Cmsaunlon and Substantial outdoors at an Intermittent vale a1100dns, per ASHRAE 622-2010 Spedficationr Engineer Rehab only) 7.5b Exhaust Fans: latchen 0 (Mnderbte Rehob wt v) Ventllaticin(Nety Thepicifect"ll Install a ventilation system that wIllcalldy, the fresh air Project Plans and Mechanical CAvia Documerdation 7.6a bonny] mdlubstmHof reeulremenls ofASIIRAE6L2 -2010 Location of idermrre in S Specifications TED Engineer M Reh Rrhcibm Building) V Vice p: gectwcmvdlndadeaprmdsimrequbftdmomtradmtoproAde Ventlation(Moderate Rehab BS Mamtal(cit amwr=* fotmeovwartled deaddo the opestloraandmaitenanreollhe P Project Pbnsarrd 7 7BD Po l etM+aCe M .6b on P 1 OPlearce9i NAsytmgw*wVeos ,eghihQ,pft and landscaping. S SpeifnaDons P 0 7.7 Clolha Dryer lShamt Ali clothes dryers will exhaust directly to the outdoors urine rigid -type, duct Project Plans and TOD Mechanical - work S ` 'Acatlons - , - Engineer M All 6mbustlon eaulpmeet VATl be power vented or direct vented and hard- Projed Plans and Mechinlml 7.8 Combustion Equipment - - giredmdEtedatasdllie hsaa0edHauµMaeulsskeyine area pet criteria SpeefitatlonS 7B4 - Englneef M •MaM PrevemlomVsbM Act waste heaterswillbe Installed cwTA catch pans and drainsplped to the Prolecl Nemand Mechanical 7.94 Heaters m'alaorthe rhveV S edficallons TOD [n lrieer M 79b Mold Preveneo"c5unt m AR surfaces In ball rcerrg hliihms, and laundry rooms YAII use materials that Projea Plansand TBD More heableon denabh surfaces S ecl0iatlons ttrack M Mold Preeehilom.Tubapd 79c AB baliaecims w0l haaenonpaper- hood barking materials such as cement - ProjMPlansand 780 it Showerrmlemres boitAillocar canrdbee ore ulvatent Specifications Aichl M Vapor Barrie SlralUes (NewCombuctieij and 7.10 Prcc�ctvdR Mitaeavaporbarrka mdcapillary break under the slab Provided atnewslab ongrde Project Ph urand TBD Archllect M Rehubpro%ctslwTA Specifications oundoRrin Work anfpJ Radon migation (Nov prrdectksebshrAlal of moderate rehab and will test lorradon and Radon mitigation system Will be Installed 7.11 Corobucbm asd5obmonRd Insist pasbre- radonkalmesDneceaary Hnewshb- ongrade arcasandadded Sped itisor Sprrifuallons -MD Archllect M Rehab"*) undesneNhhaemmtunits. Watericalrege(Nes 7.11 ComhuwmawReimb pry- edbvociferate ossubstan0al rehab that is me replacing assemblies Addition will be compliant N/A prgfeds retch K639 aamnNes raped latlasuBeim M coliedo @ln bdrrimdapJ 7.13 Garagetsola0vn The prefers does end baveanaltadiedstorage N/A M lives i dscapecallirrmrlemquba utosaladmiLflao,andjoint Project Plansand 7.16 krlgaled PeslMmargment s Bo&dprool se0bepimMedatalopenirms. Spedfeaticas TOD Arcbilect M teaddale Wmkflactioa 7.15 (9rb4mlfafoadbl dine N/A M Rtfmb ord►j 716 Smakaf-rea0mld -mg The rolect% -At enforce ano- smoking policyg 9 Intended Points osnciver er" ual to tb ara ren -t m v aowq = me company. —,.d pmddea COMA 1. the woperryosnagenmc®rrpmy 1■ FrMdmt'sAdared ma®taidecivateroo b, Themeowlwilladdratteesdeardne produm andsduchdek watmouo11oo0on ofwalershut ails, props use WA Pre)ed manager M syatear aodepecrallem ofa9 appgonces and spedalplumbisq Rcaterer. The propctscopewibrdodea provision regohfag the eantradorto provide ReslderdawnlPrepely an mles� lothepropety manager oe 0erbmldYgleahtra4 operation Project Pleasant! B.3 oderiaacera>ckviisetire0eeo feaiores. The, 7BD fyojetManaeer M Maaagalimdatim ofienttimwiebevideo Speci icatioos taped fe fohveaeferesimlhepraperymanage —a peooide Inforr itionm fairies to prcimore a healtiry ifesme. Project Data Collection acid 8.4 Monitoring System D 0 intended Points 27 Green Development The following signatures provides a written commitment demonstrating that all parties involved in the execution and delivery ofthis Agreement project agree to be accountable to measures and strategies as outlined in application documents. portlon is most easily satisfied by either ai printing the Intended Methods tab and having the various team members fill out and sign their portion or bj using d1eitlal th Enterprise Green Communities CeriGfication, signatures must be provided by at the project manager, architect, and general contractor. If these 3 iignaWres a OATORY SIGNATURES 6/S /2014 AA ofsubmission will be accepted. will not proceed through Step 1 of it ri —ary, provide additional C CAvia Documerdation Criteria Item HoO Criterion will be implemeded i irdormaliogar'explana {icd of illerisg& C Location of idermrre in S Champion Intended Points .appioachio.meeiiri•this measure L Project Dowrrants t type for locating measure Building) V Vice p: gectwcmvdlndadeaprmdsimrequbftdmomtradmtoproAde BS Mamtal(cit amwr=* fotmeovwartled deaddo the opestloraandmaitenanreollhe P Project Pbnsarrd 7 7BD Po l etM+aCe M M P 1 OPlearce9i NAsytmgw*wVeos ,eghihQ,pft and landscaping. S SpeifnaDons P company. —,.d pmddea COMA 1. the woperryosnagenmc®rrpmy 1■ FrMdmt'sAdared ma®taidecivateroo b, Themeowlwilladdratteesdeardne produm andsduchdek watmouo11oo0on ofwalershut ails, props use WA Pre)ed manager M syatear aodepecrallem ofa9 appgonces and spedalplumbisq Rcaterer. The propctscopewibrdodea provision regohfag the eantradorto provide ReslderdawnlPrepely an mles� lothepropety manager oe 0erbmldYgleahtra4 operation Project Pleasant! B.3 oderiaacera>ckviisetire0eeo feaiores. The, 7BD fyojetManaeer M Maaagalimdatim ofienttimwiebevideo Speci icatioos taped fe fohveaeferesimlhepraperymanage —a peooide Inforr itionm fairies to prcimore a healtiry ifesme. Project Data Collection acid 8.4 Monitoring System D 0 intended Points 27 Green Development The following signatures provides a written commitment demonstrating that all parties involved in the execution and delivery ofthis Agreement project agree to be accountable to measures and strategies as outlined in application documents. portlon is most easily satisfied by either ai printing the Intended Methods tab and having the various team members fill out and sign their portion or bj using d1eitlal th Enterprise Green Communities CeriGfication, signatures must be provided by at the project manager, architect, and general contractor. If these 3 iignaWres a OATORY SIGNATURES 6/S /2014 AA ofsubmission will be accepted. will not proceed through Step 1 of 'Project Mpnoger. 9nil, Larson Architect- DMdjj"IandALk tractoj4 C;'.d?IC,�DtfjItTDO Green Building Specialist; EnjineerIMEP]: <Pro'Ado Stjnature[sj of Gredn DdIklopffient Team Mernber(s)> Energyan0for System Specialist: TO 66 West Cost and Financing Information 66 West is an adaptive reuse from an existing bank to 39 residential studio apartments. At this point, the budgeted construction cost is $5,300,000 and the total development cost is $10,080,000. Qn a per unit basis, the construction cost is approximately $136,000 and the development cost is approximately $258,000. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency urges development projects to contain costs. Asa, method to gatige appropriate costs, and as a way to give preference points to projects that contain costs, Minnesota Housing publishes historical averages of other affordable housing developments in Minnesota. As project cost varies based oil location and housing Type, costs are broken down ley category. The average total development cost of new construction for adaptive reuse in the metro area for zero or one bedroom units is $267,930 per unit. 66 West is nearly $10;000 per unit mote cost effective. The bulk of the capital. cost is expected to be covered through tax credit financing. Minnesota Housing awards tax credits on a competitive basis. to developers of non -profit housing, who in turn, sell the credits to a private investor. Private funding and deferred loans from Minnesota Housing and local government units fill the remaining funding gap. The tax credit allocation and defetTed Raiding restricts the rent and income levels. 1 - ,�jay , 4f® .�jo�k,M tf'wf F'+v�y 66 West Apartments 3330 66th 51. West. Edlll BARNS ROAD, 1 I x \ A D a � 7,, I o �� i c1.'61M�i iWe1(m LI Vi T 1 N a i , •''Q�j"�._`,:+rf COLORED r _ +e , .lf f r . VIP SITE PLAN v •' '. �. .... _._....____ ..... _.__.__._. . @Y�. _. .. .rim.\ .._L v��- __.__.._... �" / -' .• LA20C SIlE PL4N - � ' llek- r , P f. ✓f, rw. , m .. y.,.µ n r m 66 West Apartments ''"�N 2 0 2O1 EDINA MN 1 06.10.2014 1 14 -0016 +','o VIEW FROM -�, r_..� �,� � � NORTHWEST 66 West Apartments CONTACTS eaHla[cran.Txn �.�., 0.MMTtwwlriw[t YMw1,Yiw IeowfY. ,000[IIt1 roe:[!!: YH,V[M/OT'wA,[[Y,.Tf IAnK[rYfY rwr „u�w art. nlartw: wlow[no,we wor<x..: .n.,.wc Iww: rr,norec wencws n«w [uwxsr[ .� wecw�rrmw:HSrmaw � .rc rPOa[PIIMEI1n COrf•101: .CIH11AIw nR,® �� .•R[FEI' IwOYNHCYMnIwfnT �'[NIw,lI1 [HPr fH lMl II[HC W: INMIMw HPaWl1Y Iuw,: Tq[IipH f H1A99FB„neCYCYflET [MML ,IWwPYMtfM Site Pian Review Submittal UNIT COUNT VICINITY MAP NOTTO]G E - 9�4wVT — "t 7 io r SITE & BUILDING STATISTICS c BICYCLE PARKING SYMBOLS June 19, 2014 GENERAL NOTES tnwn,an a OGwawMpeawsHlot,of: tAUnn tt,ar rasa. ttafr tutewtt - Tmntaox[r.. ttwfr ,.aata,ae [,- mwr e r,f wtnaw2ux. au aoww�[[ : sre a nnatneu,nla!,ai[� rr�wnrwwa.. avaw�xwtr e Rtyfllrf[R,owm[M n nAwr - aJnreMUn tMla tHr.Yaw a wownr,ml.[cawnw a.r H TCI�I:ET{fwINI WA tnpgr c BICYCLE PARKING SYMBOLS June 19, 2014 GENERAL NOTES wwilr[we,o trw mn MaWiY ftnORRWYITIn nIH l� �TLm IWYIY 66 West Apartments 3330 fifitfi St. West. Ed- UR9A_ r6 ,0z TITLE SHEET /lWk :J�/N.MwIOH[IR�1lE46 Ma:F: H�[RII.aI@pNRSIMf ,fetnnwuYa, � nww.vnev„:exww.. txrTro[ wotnra wiwfl,Pe. �ewari,re[t tMla tHr.Yaw ,WIC! AIMR.v. R. ►,I[ta i!W rAwANo .61R1i! 161M.1e101a `_�MIr[rnPr! RNAMwA[Y,Tglwa.,, Oara:YFII I[.1 .w.; Hlwn[I[r vurw, mnw[la iHO m� wMf l [aa,� rrawntr[ ww- vAwe"PORl4®, [ww; paekuncEwxewVRFin wxarnww,ml �uw,Tnn ww:Hl Mev eHaw¢eae _ _ _ M1�,• �'b � wn r \\nwswrwwfrw XNY: wR®InxoY.eww, YlL wflr M HVws'wIPAw V.Y![' �NnIE - wW, wmtwu SaIIIAe,iwKwlrw,f M910M :nl Ea: xA99!@N R€MY!N r4YF� [BIMw![ Mlaa[s Aw fYa Rs3r<Xa: MTwI[,IR [!wK!}w �w!R[W: YIHW919w �. �[. . [}tV4 wHfNgH[ENfNOP„/ ETiw!: OFIHI%WW7RgPMw@Ad p€Te614NNt1 �~�. �O� •: .. �0 �. >`• IIrYY,V:IfeM rnwwwtpw[ � Mlawmm� � n ��awfwwrn i ta.lw..,ro.,+• �'w,+ ®r® 1MTYM.KwM1W1Y wwilr[we,o trw mn MaWiY ftnORRWYITIn nIH l� �TLm IWYIY 66 West Apartments 3330 fifitfi St. West. Ed- UR9A_ r6 ,0z TITLE SHEET KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. ALTA SURVEY OF PROFESSIONAL LAN ILI M I 8TWE.tVEYORS BEACON INTER-FAITH HOUSING COLLABR-ATIVE SITE Rm (EXISTING TCF BANK) ,Ira( 3330 WEST 66TH STREET AREA SUMMARY CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA IM I 1;9 VIC NITY MAP S 89.4511 lig (M j __DESCRIPTION LI—T I�E T� W-WNT K . M1.31 w EFFECMA0ATtfEfi1 20.:01. NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B I— TILE WTY C0JPMV TITLE ODM.TMDIT N0. M1931 EffEC11VE DATE FE—ARY 20.2014 ZONING REQUIREMENTS III ID- A 2.z .11 1. k-1 7. < 0 iy- � Iu_ NE P.f K I— I.E.— 'TCF BANK' 333' WEST 66TH STREET (Al AEn v E— —E) NOTES "Ap 9 4 L 2>—m E BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY WEST 66TH STREET Z, Fit rc 4—Z PARKING SUMMARY �7 LEGEND CAT E STATEMENT OF APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS (a vaue say WV.—.., —0 n:, T- ;IONFE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Aar GENERAL NOTES I. o EXIIS1aNO1 INFORMATION TANEH FROM SURVEY BY MEIAPE 2. A SUBSURFACE GCOTEINIM I r NOAT- HAS x01 BEEN C ILETIED PRA Ta PR01Ett COSTRU<TION WILL BE '' wclw:li 10CnNOns of mot' B "I"101 HC CO DmoNI ENGINEER OF AN Y DISCREPANCIES FIGH TO STAR11NG A Ell EN C[ STOW SEWER ON BEING TRANSPORTED 011-51E w M VICONrnOLL[D MANNER CCNINA711NfC — A Di SEOYFM SMq /OR DFBMS ANOEIS GULLY CUNC_ 1, I.L. AREAS DISPLIBED BY CON M WITCH put SrpE lxC is OF PAVING ME 10 BE RESPEREE0 AND EKOETAlEO. M AND /OR ABUNOI ' 1O BC PERFORMIEO m CORpINCE W TTY OF EWN.A AND STATE T. ElSTwCE__ MET1— IN 1N1w MPROUNAIE wCI HIED iTO: pETCIRK.L1[„FP FiroN[, GAS. WCMINTINOt CABLE. GANIANY $TORN SEWER aiOCWATER NNH. CO R TO COTKT 1. MMNR 51AtC ONE CUT. RECOREE BVAToC. d ALL E. BAD UFLITS AND OTHER I IOKMENIS ME r0 RENAM NOTED TED OIIFRMSE.1 D111 "'BING MPROKUEMS�lMDSCMIlIL�SI LTIES TO. PRWD TIE A CAN E C'PENM NO IINNIDM co KR OKR THE TOR OF PPE AS POILOYIS A B' -R WATER u B. 5 11 1 C. I O_ STORM SEMR[R IZ ALL MNE50rA SYMGMN AND NEGUTAHM S. AND STATE OF t0. AEL EXCAVA1i0N5 MUST CDUPLY wrtH Mf REOUIRELUM OF B f . PAM 1D2fi. SUDPANT P 'EXUVA — MD 5 THEHSOLET RESPONSIBILITY OF 1 1TI+E HAT S_ A SHE INLITY SMIiMY SEWER LAND STORK SERNR TAT ILINOES I'D BUILDING. IT, LOCATION IDDRUNATE BIT UNEOCPIN OF cOnxCC110 wrtRHlx TIC. I II1EGYHS ORNITACS TL KRIFY LOUDON SIZE AID[OUANNNIYCOF ALL ROOF 5 URAwS MD UNUTY C EC005. P.. PROWOC BMNCAUES AT —11 AND 510[wAl1t5 PER CITY OF EDNA AND MINES N IT. MWMNN 0 FEET KREICN. MD 10 CEET H RZ...LL MIMPION BEtwffX NATER AND ME PIPES. ITT. AIL PAVEIAM MANOICS EI 11 AGUACENT STREETS TO RE NEST011E0 TO — EMUN C. 11. ERIN W NOT ROUT[ AREAS OF TEMPoRARY SUPPDRT m1EM4. NE CLNrNACHOR IS RESPg19BlE FBI ALL —1 MSS SODS AANO WRL NAME .1N. CONIRCL ONER ME MSGN GF ALL STgPY10, sNR_. BRALwc. MCXIXUCES. EYGVATpN SUPPoRf RMLS. EMECTIONAL BOIBNC. VILER AACZOO, SOE STABIJWXIN AND ONE. MERTHODS X151MG WPOVEKNIS. SEE SPE[RICA11pN5 FBI SUBUITAI RCPMETENTS Z0. IRDRAGE MD PRONE_ OF EuSwO III --I WINCX REND TD BE REUNITED, AND REPLACED CO COISIRUCITON OF` —CI AM THE RESP056EDY M ME BYRACTTOTI. CpEIRKtOE ION PREKNI —E OR MFPI TFEBF R_ MD to REPLACE Al OCM EMENSE. 21. GONIRACIp1 1O RECORD EIDSING CO— AS MEOfD LRTTOGR.•PHS. VIOCO P1g1OCO MAR F¢ID SLFKRNG. ETC.) O ENABLE RC DOL NI EUBUNG CtlWTpNwI SOlmlAT C �A1RL . AREAS IGI HATE POSINK DRA.N.WEiru SRYACT TO C%JSTWO. SEE SPECRIUTDIIS. 22. HOLD 11 Fw OE BY ACIEDO DH CETRIFI �r81 AA REGMSr[REO Iu E,_CER 23. WHERE DCM00CH, EXCAVATION, UNDERPINNING, EPTLEODDM N„ OR HE MM YNI1 vICInOY Of E_BUIC 'I' PRONGC VUILOIx4 SURVEYS AND SEISMIC 21. COIORANOH SX ALL REOUIKO PER4NS PROR TO siL 11TERALS FOR PROPOSED COIS1RUCN0 OR N[PAN OF H NOGMM, AND FREE MOMNDEECI5OUC15 pPEtt FROM 26. WEN PoLES.WDTXf CIMBHIN BRACE 1HDNEN PMC FLO RICAL ZT. WHEN WORgT14 MOJNO Fn w4 UNITES. Lk POLES, POWER POLES. OOT NG�O SHIN. T CPxXC55K SLUFFOENT 5[RE55 SUPPORT POOR lTE CONINACTOR 5 FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR Z[SDAMCCS TPHE THESE UNBERCROUNO FMRRE AN 2 THE SHE —1 PLA TILL BE FRONCER OMIfE CS FACTION AT THE WE OF CONSTNGCTgN f0 ON HOW IN ALL H EOTWETHROPEED OF 1rvE sOE. not ZB. CMESUUST BE liMEn DLW P IRONS ECF MY SVmEY uODUfMS MO /OR ALL SNIPS FRONN TREES MIDTEO WRNIn PROJECT LIARS HALL BE GROUND MO REIOKO IN THEIR ENTIRETY. DI. WASTE MATERIALS INCLUBINC PAKMENT REMTEB DURING 11111V" ASHE.P.IP111 11 AvATED %OTEx 4L 551iA1O DSEGOUE O THE COMNAC1IXV AND SNAL BE IEUOVED EC1 SITE MD DISPOSED 01 FIOPEnLY BY THE OPIN 0.1A .. 32. MAXI TUM CROSS-SLOPES FOR SIDEWALKS AND MA ACCESS Di TE%CEF� 5. SLOPE ALONG NE PA i,DiPAVEL.L NMEIM OR DIRECT " E.G., ERUNALE 0 I1 IN 1 NY. B. MECUATE DR.YNAGE SBLLL BEN aINCD AT ALL TIMES MY SiUIBED DUMIGICONSIXUCHIR SNALLEBE TRESIORED TO THE CONSINUCI OIG STORM TNUNO EIN 5X.41 T m 1Hf AlIOHAL POLLUTANT OI ARM 1LNU.A10N SYSTEM ONHTS) MOUNIMIETHS. 31 THE CONTRUMMI IIII ONDET I;1. AIDEa55WIBLE NAT AN. —C ITTESIBAN AT I IF 1MEA ANON TRAFFIC CONTROL PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1 L PERITETER ER III ID-1E S Sx THE PLAS PRIOR TO EROSION Ip pISTURBNICE NFS. (HAT eN.ES ME HOT u1 AC1__C PERMETENRCONiROL). ACT' 1RANCET Ai EACH POINT wNEEIIx iCq SOEXR 1X1 RE, u 3 END M�P0C1c ENTRANCE ITT LEAST OE FEET NiOB THE 10 ZONE UITNG A GEOTE."LE FABRIC BE THE RLG 1E TO INEV[Nt MIGROHON OF SOR INTO THE NICK 1101 BELOW. REMOVE AAL SOILS AND SE TS TNACIED OR OTNCRMSE a PlBVATE SPA MAY BE OMENED BY N AT CITY MY NIf 6 CO, 1 WNmAAI. SWCCPNID OunEDTTXRWGHOUT NNE DURGUN OF THE CONgRILICHONT AND DONE IN A MANILI TO PREKHT DUST BEING B INLETS BACK RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE CISNRBED INCAS. CATCH GAIN w50R15 OR OO Ett =E1 RIA BYfBLLES ORTPL lCN EAB wNM'ED FCRAifS fARENNOT FROU ALLOWED I H— PSOCNP¢ . NO FEET EVEN BTS, DST B IHEOSUOCNVILCSRBY 1NC III LINE THAI 5 ZOR D1 MEANS. C iRCAT UL SrOCNNLES BY PLSCING SM1r GANGERS MOOND THE i'ATIONAIY STOCRP1lFS LOUTEB Oil PA RFA.'S STPBESNO LE55 THAN PRO FEET [NOU TH ANULE /GUTTER LNE ANp SHALL Bf COKREO R LEFT u THAN N ry R 6. uN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEOMINT CGNTROL OENCES IN I AN MA" sPECT EE RAY E OSON rA CCVTCCS ON DkL1 BASIS AID RE CE DAMAGED. IN NCI PO EROSION COMROL OEVLCESI "ETITELF HAVE UNDERGONE EnNAL GNZ ICE AHB 1-1 CALL WXICX AYVMaN51CfROSIOr�WE TO NUN" u5E SEED AND N MO /OR 50 GREfnNSBCEN MPLCAl10I DOF GBKL SBASE ONMEM 10 BE pav U I R u n EROSION SION PO T NTAL. B. RE HE ALL TEMPORARY, SYTHRI SIRUCNIUL. nOn- BIOOELNDMLE EROSIDI ANON SEUn51fNMT CONTROL DE 05R AR ESTABUSnMENNTWFlNAI STABILZANOn HfO OF THIS REMOVAL 15 TOX ES`IAF D COVER OKR EXTpsED AEA S 9. uI ED CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANTS ME 1HE BTED CONCRETE N wC /lNUHOUTI LOCATIONS L UH AYS OI INTOAMY P.B OR1EPPoVAIENB�ORH OPNNN CONVEYOHCE. COMPUCSOwNSinuPd n[oP A CONCRETE WASHOUT UMMST E OISHE TIUT P 10. CON BC10R5 OPPNOVIDE Lw MO OETNLS FOAL ALA PNCPOSED AIERNATE TYPE SDENC . 11. U1 EROSION CONTROL ELEIENTS EME TEUPORMY. CONTRAGION TO ART 11 LANI HITALL 111 CONTROL ELEMENTS PM ON CmNSavcNDN uraH coNPLn1oI of FINAL PAVING AIDOrUNF ESIIBLSHMEIT $1C 12. CH05111 CO N4 NNE PENTAITER OF THE, rtE E %UVA ro ILER0 GIN COTRO PLACED BE PMC IT ODES _ CONTRROL mu w'orz'IRiAMD N i5 THE RETURN llaYNTUEFNTGE�t OF R1ApR :MIT uF CITY OO SIANOARDS. LLO Oil PLANS FOR THE FS AND[BCNIND iNC BCRH OF C I fu5f CURB ALs u$ ROAD 15 10 ALL BE SOLELY BY THE COMPACTSOLELY OR. SEE GO ILSL MO SPECmC�gnS. 1 0 10 P AND /OR M OIu MHE IEwcnRSSCUR ST CL EA D"I" sFEW AN /.I LOCemI A1i10 T1s5iL Y 14. CONTRAOOR TO ONIN, PROVTpE TEMPORARY SEED MD MULCH On ALL L RYC sE LBS PER ACRE AND IGOD MULCH FIBER AT It CARS PER LOGO ASF. bO I5. STRAwRALES ME 101 ALLOWED OH SHE In ANY CMACRV. r. . 11 ^• e LEGEND MM STTIH O FxISTInc 510RN NARNGLE f.NH ❑ EXISHH. ELECTRIC MANHOLE fD ® EXISTw4 CATCH BASIN CD �/ EXSTwc GATLX BASIN FN o E—D FILE NXDRUAC vv © Exrs1wG WATER VAY1 ET EM U`C flFt1RIC IMANSIDIIIII LP 0 EXISTING 1I01 POLE BE 0 EXISOC BB—B UGIT GIN © Exmwc GAS M.EI TP. QT E—D TELEPHONE FUSER _b 1XI}IRIFi SILK —FIE— EXSTwC VIDERLRMwD ELEOPIC —OH— EXSTwC 0v,_ URImA UUE —SS— FISTING SANRNrt SEMI LANE —ST— TRINN4 SDI. SEWER UNE —1/— Ex15TIN0 WATER MAIN OR SERMC[ —FD— E%ISINC UISEICIWnO 1IBEIOPH1 —G— G% N, LAS Man DI SE , - - — MUTMITY UNE 25R PROPOSED CONFOUR +m PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION Hf DENOTES SURFACE DPanAGE PROPOSED SIAGNT LINE ® PROPOSED STANf MAII PROPOSED .-.IN © PROPOSED CATCH —,I 0 1ROPOSCO uANN01E • PROPOSCD DOwNSPoIR DO PROPOSED vUK < PROPOSED EIRE DEPANNAfNT CONNECTION ® PROPOSED RE1aNINC WALL SIT B / •lJ,(` %Yi PROPOSED BRUUun M.HI PAVNG PROPOS(D CONCR[rC PANNE PROPOSED CONCRETE 510EWAK ` PIpPDSED 10x51RUCO01% CXINMCE i - %%\11 elt PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 . 4'. . f O a� gs'r1� O -�1��■ R � � z nEMmE mluwxous PAVEYEM 66 West Apartments ameem sti wel. Edna Swat ME M11111,11.1. m r�� "bra ® 17'\SITEI DEMOLITION PU zo o zn 40' w i 4'. . f 1. flEMOVE COXCPEIE CMB MN GURNi � � z nEMmE mluwxous PAVEYEM ` 1 flEYDVE COXCREIE PAVpI[M X. REMM SEGMMM. RETMNMO wN1 9. REMOVE SIGN MID 665E ' �4� - . -,{ D. flENOK LLdl POLE N+D E 7. RENDS RRE[ aND SRY1m B. REMOVE CMI - 5UPPOM P0919. MID FDOENGS 9. REMOVE iRASN ENttASURE MIO FOOTINGS UW�ANVSCI. +:��r 2 ? 10. RE- BME RK a 11. REMOVE PNEUMRIC WBE IMIUSIRUG RE /1 12. RE•IOVE XMID MLXO yf $� U. REMOVE TELLER NM:XINES MID BOE1IA09 IV. REMOVE F POLE MID 615E 15. REMOVE DMIR'SICN MID FEE—, NWNEVau; 1u1 Mlm ' R1219ULTPM PIERCE PINI Or 1. wGMr PM2NDR ro ivu OEPM •g/ 11. RE- BENCH MID CONCRETE PM ASSOCIATES PNELIMINANY NOT FOP z 9� o FE F 0' Y R =1 &a I \ TO •. a " SME STREET �`.�`t ' r" EM LITTON -- - -.......- .. ... _...._. __ _ • R ---- a -. ....- _- •= PLAN ., PRELIMINA r -za NOT FOR comsTBUCTiON ' iwalNL ROeR COHSwa1Ca rzo¢.wara ve.aies u e , rrricu. s¢ oou[ /ccaa fl 66 West Apartments xwa UwME UnEiA 9 •I �•._, F m i PIERCE PIN[ $ S O —° A550GATES Ld ��� •• �' i i ' PNEMMINARY� „1 NOT FOH es: rvT.ea_so .. ' 6'. - -i cwaTmtt,T rrta cxrveow seas 9�d .Ml -0 m • d I umru masm, wmw. evxar w •� swrrs �nry oA sr¢vca, [rwcu. s . `aarus ee[i ermrtcrmx a u,_ [:va s¢ e1�i ew � easlxs enem[ u.w ,arc[wr [w rUn „ ^ O .°., a " ' n `•��S WEST 66TH STREET _ J GRADING, AN- v� 'r �� .DRAINAGE m o�,:<r ° °• ,�•• h EROSION CONTROL PLA �ww GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN „•�� PRELIMINARY NOT C30( za 0 x0 40• w .p FOR CONSTRUCTION y R PDILIRgM PREVENTION EFFORTS DURING, PROECT mN151M1CITOX K R CONTRDL SCR Ilm R ON ME SITE AND PREWrt THEM RRJ LEUMB THE PROSE SHE — FmNINO ro SIARFµE HE PURPOSE OP MIS $ R K TO PRRRE CUM[TJNES FOR ARRMIIG I- GOµ THE SRPPP GOT MIY, ME BUW NS ro THE MULURON CONROL MESUES BEING URLIIm. IECT GON45R TI STx THE CON om E A NEW MU—MG7 N41G COI�LLX. PMORG LOT, Olm ON MN E—D SITE — A BNM N .— Mee05pTq. HMCES TO CORNEIJA. WE - MIS WE IS IDEx11Nm AS M IMPARm WATER ON ST FOR NUIRKNr /ERRIPH —N! BIIXARGLL INDICATORS. AEAEOUMED TO BE TREATE D M PORE OF ME NOES PERNN. -N /A ITaNNNA w ME PROTECT E BITER DISCI MGE K NET MMCTPATED TO WP ANT E THE FOLLOLRm: - OUTSTMMNO ESMMCE — OUSTERS. TRRQ wAFRS. wnUAms. fJLCNSOUS FERS. PRR[fl11ES LISTED BY ME —m. ERSTR OF HKTIN C RACES R ARCNµQACCµ SUES [ PRWCCT STRUPRATCR —ARGE K XE OUBROT TO wP1EwL EGIILAIMII DE TO ANT OP ME 'eMDMNo: ME RWIR " CCONTUMI ME PERMOTEE(S) M TO NTIED BY ME RUES PERIL. E PESPOH4ME RR 8 R -SE RRLEMEINMON E ME -- NCLUDING ME AOTMTIES OF AL E ME CORMLTON(S SRCRNIIVCI0TI5. . EMSION OR SHAG RIND S A PENT CONB OL UPS TO (E Am EIRFMNCm R A D NMITRCx R EMS ION PREVflRKN AND SmMEIII VPPP. SUPS ITT OvERS[E ILL MSTNUnOH AND NNNT[NAEE OF BOPS AND IINIEENTATON OF ME SLURP. CONDUCT SNNL PRRAE PERSONS OF IfiXTRING ME 1RMM6 FOR MID E ME NPES PRUf TO CONDUCT INSPELTR MD NNN E NLFROSR PREVRTION ANp ERNEIII mN1aR UPS IN wmRDMCE IwM M RENRENENR OF THE —N. ONE OF 'WE IHONMWL(S MUE E AvALABLL M ONSE RTSPECT10n P-M ]2 HOURS UPON REINVEST BY MPC0. R SHALL PROWOE C pOCUIIFxiATOx TR.THESE IN —Uµ(S) AS REQUIRED E ME NPEES PERIT. TINS —.No DOCUMENTATION. SNN.L BE RECORDED IN OR RIM THE TRPPP BEFORE ME SORT OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS ME PERSONNEL FOR ME PROJECT HAVE BEEN DCERUNED. DOCUMENTATION SMNL RUPEE E PERSMIEL A50NiED WRH THE PRMEE THAT ME REQUIRED TO BE TRUMID PER PMr III.FFI THE THE PERMIT. a.2. MUTES E 1RAMN0 MD DINE OF INSTRUER Ax0 ENTRY PRRADIE —No. 4p. CONTENT OF TRMRNG COUEE OR WORKSHOP RRUOINC THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRANIIO . FOLLOWNC RML STABMGTLR MIT ME TERYINMON E COVERAGE FOR ME IRMS PERMO. ME ,MER IKUiFRW ECI..EDD 1TO�RRURS LONG TERM OT4R— AND —EMNCE (0 ! M) OF THE PERMNEM STRN E FRLRYING STRING WTERLA MPLY TO THE DESK OF SRLMURER TREAMUGI FµwNES. H/A • RB EN', N/A = ET SCRENTATRI S SINS: N/A PERMANENT IOLIM WFLTMRON : RNMUM E 0338 CURC UET E NETMTMN WLWE PERUMENT REARµ PONDS: N/A µTEMU1ME IXMEM' N/A E FOLLOWING SCOUENE DESERNT M GEIIRAL ME WOOL On ME STE: FJ)ENTMCLOR STUN VERPL' MAT 011 PERMITS DIVE BEEN OEMXm — /OR 0 KCNTRUICTOR MM PERT RMIT£iE NSPECTOIS, RECORD REEPNO AND RECORD RETENTION IN CONTR K SHALL IXSTµL AL MUMETER µ1D DEN- CMDIENT ERGSR CONROL Alm EEOWEH SDNMOL BEST NMMEMENT PRMIICES (BARS). CONSTRUCTION mMMES MD INLET PROTECT ION ENCES PRIOR TO SITE CRµING, IX-MIM, SGMAUNG R DROURIND EXISTING W"""" C' CLMMCIOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING, EIN —IRON, BRCHPIIMG MRH IN ACCOMME WORN ST1I"I— "U"" PREVENTION PLW (SWPPP). CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTAL INSECT. MONITOR MD MASON TEMPORMY MG PERMANENT EROSION CONTRACTOR SHML REMOME EDUQIN CONTROL DEYM:LT PRIOR TO 5Uw1If1Pm NOTICE R RESUMPTION (NOT). BOLT nOTEE OF 1p00Mlmx TO HRCA NIIMI 00 DAYS OP fmµ STIBILIGnR. reNSlnuReN D iRlD PER�mnmRTe ML TEND EWHOOW EMFlXT9 SMML BE LUTIOPEO M MCgJSANCE TWIN . EOUmRENK E ME HPDES PEI1MR LAID STOMRUIR POLLUTION PREVENTIOX RANI (SNOOP). 4 NEIENf ME SwPPP IJm PRDVOE RIPS MDMFIFD N ME SwPR N M ME CQ R Alm RR'IiONµ VAINER, B. ME mNTMLTR SHAM RS. ro ORMOL SE WNDI E TO W—E AD /S�PPIEMETR ERa90N _IM DC U NCO s o MT CO DED NUSIRES W OF E R I RITE PRDTECnR CAP DIsnmem s0as MD wmuAE MEwmox E SEDIUFNT TRAHSVOM orF -sFIE ME FOLLOMMG STORM -TOT POLLUTION PEVEw10N CONSTRUCTION ACIMiT EI[m EOUAEREx1S SRAM E NRNISHOD E THE COHTRMTR. COMRACRN SHNL BE RES. SIBIE FOR THE FOLLOERC EROSION PIINENTION PRAOTRES: ME C-WmCI0N -- A VEGETATIVEVE COVER, UM. E AT EIOEMTVESBLE°TITIE UOMRK MGS NMMO [ DISTURBED RUST BE DEL TEO ON THE SITE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. B. STMILUETON ON ALL EXPOSED SOULS MUST BE INNUTED MMERMON MENEVR CONSINCMN AR— HM'PRMMENTLY OR TEMPOPPBILYOU M On MY MMION OF ME SITE AND M. NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EREEDMO 7 Ey A�SISsuEy AL SIS.' (NFL Q"LISY INCLUDING EOCXPIIES BIM SIGNIRGNT SILT, MT OR OENRC COMPONENTS: — URANON MUST E COMPLETED MKIN T ry, RRM C. INMAE NORLW. WETTED PERMEIER E MY TENPRUIIY ON PERUMEIII DIDSWE RR T OTI IS TER FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE R RIVERS WATER MOUND A SNE MUST E STMTwI[0 BY CON I E OOR WITHIN 200 FEET FNRI ME PROPERTY EDGE R THOU THE POINT E DISCNME TO ._ E WATER YNNMG N HOURS OF CONNECTING 10 A SUTUXE INTER TEMPGRMTT OR w HOURS R.COIMECRG LO A,SUIU'MEawlfAn w: COL wILLIa M.. IL —LIEU TAHIN N TO E MEN TTo N,CRFASE SEDUEM REM. UMILMESiNRLTWJ�mN�VONIF�116� . MEIN ME SITE CNIfRMfR MUST EwIE VROULY DI54PMOH DEVOTES F NEMSMY TO PREIRKNI ORSIGH MEH1 DUECTING STOTWFOifGI TO VEGETAm MGT. O, FsmVCrn rnNTRn mtNWt OR SMALL BE RESPmKHQE NR THE IBLLDmNO SE011¢l r CONTROL PRMCCES A mnEMRR OUST NSTµL ILL OCRX GRADEIG! PERARIm CONTROLS. BEFOE — R GMDEHT DKTIAmMCE BEDMS. CONIMCRR STULLL. MMNWN PEERS.— CONTRA R ROIL TOOL STM0IEMIRI NAS BEQI fSTNILISIm. - 6 STE[PR I. M RRD010'N UCNGM 01 S 2R ON LESSON l0 LWf NL 510Pm E 1lIV OR C. F OOTM CRMIEM SEIDI@Q CONTROLS ARE OVETIIAADm. TIE COMORCiON MUST THST- ADDn10NA UPL ENT IERMEM CONTROL P—I— ON —UM— BUDS TO EMUMATE D.EALOwWG ME SWPPP MUST BE —RED TO IDENTIFY MOM —I— PRARICES. D. RUING AND MST —COLON OF SEDIMENT CONTROL ITMCES CM E MAUSTED BY CONTRACTOR TO MCOMUSIM SHONT-IENM ACTWITES SUCH AS CLEWING MIT CRUBBMG GR V ,H PMSwL OWL' SNRNNMC- -TERM MIMfY MUST E COMPLETED AS OUICHLY AS POSSIBLE Mm ME SEOwRI CONTROL CS MUST E INSTALLED IMMEDNMLY AFTER THE —TY IS COLRLETEO AND IN ALL CASES PRIOR TO THE KENT PRECIPRARON EVENT. E A STORM SETTER INLETS AND OUTLETS — BE PROTECTED BY CGMRACTOR MM MMDPGATE TIMPS LNG THE MINN. THESE PRKTES Sx REUNH IN PIAE UNTIL ME POTENTOL SOURCES FOR DISCHMDING SEDIMENT 10 INLETS HAVE BEEN STMIUZED BY CONRUROR, F SOUL STOCKPILES SIC HALL 1X01 BE P—ED RLSRFACE WATERS ORESTOTORM UDENRCO CES: NL SNALL RE PRROOTECTED By C�MKIOR IABT 01COMER OF MUULLCH. PEROSION NxIFOL w15 OHRPLASTIC SHOOING. G. COMNClRi 5HAL MPIENFNT YEA4REB 10 COHMOL VER[IE 18L10NG OFF SOLE R.C. mUNNENT STEM OUST BE RKINLFD. BT 11—R ro IMmOEE IOUWCimlc TILaMESTL CO;IR —R 5MLL ip— EEEr SLEEPMG AS HEEES".MY R BNIS AE NOT NIERIATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FIRM BERIG TMCNED ONTO ME STREET. SI_L CONTRICTOR TIO)1 GSxs M ERRm E ME I4wnT. I. CUHNIMTR ROUTE 4a COYPACRON �PRE59MF`�RR50a, U `YNEFATKILR MC E CRJPACGm. J. ME CU RUCTOR MUST PRESCRVE A 50 FORT N MNL BUFFER OR RO— REWHOMT SERPENT UCLRUIDRDISMD STIMRRWM'AER MTURNS TO ME SLBRI "NOR ATER. FEET E ME PROPEn UKTURBAIIE k IF POLYMERS. ROCCULANTS, R OTHER SEDIENTAnoN TRGIMEM CHETBCa: R M USED ON STS. Tl CLHMT LTR MUST COMPLY MM ME FMJDInne RERPE CxCEETJ ULi AmmON 11. —LINE 0L1AfA�na�i+r �ta0� S°E1fwr�IxLRVLRE M�iwJmTD IN, FOR ME SWCIT STRWWATR K MEOTED 10 A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM WREN µCOWS ETIN— E THE MC PRIOR TO DISCHMGE RmICALS MUST E SEJECRD — ME MPPOPRUTRY SURE, TO ME TYPES E SORS I To BE MPOSE DUMN, CRSRUOTIRL CHDR4T MUST BE USES IN ACCCPOOxE E O�E5PE Y M SU Gax µm SEDIMENT R V9GNEURCCARR PP DD B T I- luTUCTRER CCOOMTRACTOR SDLL E RESPONSIBLE FOR ME FOLLOWING —RUNG REQUIREMENTS: A a NIRN� O" DE -THING AGTVMES TINT DIVE SERUMT -UOM OISGHMCE WATER MUST BE ED INTO A TEMPGRMY OR PERMMEE SERMENTATION BASIN NONEVER POSSOIL OTHERWISE O MMM T BE L DISCHARGED THROUGH SOME FORM OF EE m ENE" PRMNCE (UP) W T FROM LGwHO ME SITE PMR 10 pISR - ME CON= SNNE PEMORM A wSUAL TEST TO ENSUE MEOUATE THE EM IS ,PENNED IN THE BASIN OR BLIP MR APTLY MEm01ML TH LINT M EENMER 10 ENSURE OEOwIE TRGMEM. B. ME CRITMER SULL OISCNMCE WATER RR DEWATEMNO IN A MMNER 1HM DOES NOT —SE UKMCE CONDMON£ THE S T DISCXMCE WATER ULL BE GRI_SED OVER M ACCEPTED —11 DISSUAMN MFASNE AJm NOT —RSRY AFFECT THE ECEMNO — OR DORNSTREAM UJmORNERS R VEIWNOS. L F COEWWTOR K USOm FLTBLS MM BM—SH WATER. ERIE COEMCTOR SHNU. HNL ME BADIIwASN RIMER -. POM E M0 6V0NOMIMVATNww RR�IIxTO ME SITE IN AI- E TM 06 ORES rlor GIIE RDSON. - S mNTMCfR 9WL BE ESPONSNIE FR PEIIm— ME mlLowwc ursErnaK ATm NANTEIUNCE MRG DISPfLnONS FV0 mOSMN PRfv[N1MN MD SIDMENT CRIROL BIAS TINT ME XOTHHAN. ILL XONNnCiIOW1 BLM9 MUST E REPAMm, AFPI. ID. OR SUPPLUIRIED MM FUNCiMIµ BNPS —1 21 HOURS LATER PS— OR BTHERBTSE IN ACCOROME MM ME H PEME RFNRR"'ENTS. ME COxntLLTR S— µS0 MALE MY wRIRµ ROSIER OL .—RM OCRm x[ESSMY BY MMA MTIOI 24 HOURS E IT E FRO- — B. ME Co RRACTpR MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT ME SITE ONCE EVERY ) DAIS DURING MM£ COITPUCTSM LAID RmIIN 3a HORS ATER A RAINFALL EvEM GRG1R MM O_T INCHES IN 21 O O£ IN C. PIER IIGSPOI P MO RNEBINLE CpNWCTEO SRPP CON ON MUSE BE MERGED F IONTRAC MD RETONFD MM ME NWNM Or COn1MCi0R. CTOR'S ECE MIST S VMPLLTEO BY CONTRACTOR M COHmRLWICE WITH NPEES PERNII. COMRACTOBS ECROS MUST 0. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION. NAME E PERSON CONDUCTING INSPECONH. FINDING OF INSPECTION INCLUMNO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COFGDGYTS ACRR. LS OF CORRER4E ACTION TMEN (DATE TINE. PARTY CONPLEFRG THAI GE ALTIwfIES). °. ,ATE AND MOUNT OF RMHFAL CRGTER MAN 0.4 VICxES M 3a HOUILS. I. IF AMY . RNTSCHMTE IS OBSERVED TO E O(CRRINO DURING THE OISPErnR, A RECORD R . HE RRCRtt FROM —C. THEE IS A DKCHMGE MUST E MME. MD ME fDICE sHALL BE DESCTIBED (COLOR, O� FLOATING, SEYLEO, OR SLISJRTMFD SORB, MN, OIL STEEn. AMR OMM OIDICaMui) HEOGUPHED. O. OEUNEIQP110N E CxMCES HME ro RWPR. P C. ONCE YOMNR THEE MWENS9 SN +MLSTRE - PE�CTEDKfttYCRR�ACT. FOR LNMANw IPET —ED To OOO OF U MD RUIN N MMI E ME SPRING RUDIFF R PRIDED TO LOUGING CO.,MN -,,, mNDxNG ALAI• DINER STOPPAGE, N RCIEVER COMES MUST. E TILE CONTPICTRX IS ESPMO'MIE FINE ME vISPEOTmM AJM IMMH]IArE OP BuPS IJIOL MOMR EMO , SNUU CESU2 R ME PROTECT M UNDOWME MEN. STABIIIAMN AND M SEEN HOT N,S D TO ME MP- P. ALL EROSION CONTROL YGTURE9 ROTE E NSTAMID AHm MMNTANED BY CDxRUCGMI MCROMO 700 ME OCULS INRUDED IN ME CON —GROIN DpNLEHR MIT IN ACCRmME MM 1. DIRT ww16ACNnERS nECRm GHS. AL NR MITER µ IMPS THUS E —ED R REPIAFED MTHW to HR11I5 E RSCOKE, R M SRN AS i18D CONMNDIIS .W DM. 0. oNTYRUC3R�tTIN IT - BECOME �E xOTI FLxEIIONA. �EIHE SFERRUM OE,uLFF THE DGXT E ME —CE. COxiRµTOB — REPAJR R MIMCE EVES RUT IS WFUN — BY ME ER OF THE MCNT BUSHES DAY MR OISmSSE. R iNREMTER M SOON M REID CONOx10NS PLR. EIMORMY AND PFHIIAJIENT Sm1E11TATION ISMS MUST BE DRMNED AMID SEOMENT 'RMOVm W C MRUCTR ONCE THE SEOMRI COUEnC0 RETCHES ONE HAJF THE STORME —ME RM 72 HOUa5 OF OKCOVLRr, OR AS SOON AS QEm CaNWK)HS PLOW. C MIT R SIMRIm'BY CO iaµTOR M'ENW]TCwTS or DISCGVETITEY INCLUDING �DEELTM MUESTOHI. SEWER SEDIMENT DEPOSITS. ME COEMLTHI SHML E RESPONSIBLE FOR OETUNNG ILL PRIME REQUIRED, IF NECESSMY. FOR SUCH SEDIMENT REAIOVµ .. J. CONTNACl . SHNL BE RES-51BLE FOR MERINO ..No PAVES ERIFT—S RFAN BF ERLIENT. CENSMUC SM ENINMLES SMLL BE CHEERED DALY E CONIRCTOR. B THE EHIRMCE BECOMES CONTRURUCTOOL STRREMr511FMWC N - FROM THE CCG smRUDErDH CHTIMHCN SIVU BEULTTE ECXEO DALT BY mNTROAOR RR OFF 11 SEGMENT 1RM110 TIRO PAVES SURFACES. TIES AfffAS DILL BE SWEPT SLUR OF DISCOVER. COMRMTOR S EIREND SRWEEPUm TO ME CNEYm or ANY IN 2 SEDWBO 1MCRXG NMI ORUOS OFF -SUE R CONQUER SHALL E RESPON E ro REROVE ANT OFF -SITE SEDIMENT --NS M A MMHNER MD A A {REOUSICT SUFFICIENT TO MINMRE OFF -SE WPACTS. EDMDn mom RCDIXO N RI -1 Is 11LOM TMC ovR E INNLRATUI/mMm— ME, CONTACT INFORMATION SEDIMENT ALY]wUATm OVFA TNi1L1TiATION /HLIRµNM4LRT E EMR/EO E CONRMTR. M. cDxaLw OR SILL moTECr MRLTwmoX/RLTRw]mn ARC+s'm scoNcHmAnpN Nm OWNER d[ LONG -TERM MAINTENANCE InO1TDUm S'D cwlnMU`xTN:c TOP 'EwVPa'R's uEIMOACIRiwxM,vCID TTHE90— NMST BECC aFEMIT LpM1" °Xi NARHm SD THAT xTAVt. CONSIRUCTIRI EOURYEM W61 NET CO, THE SOIL �� PCE x. u1sPECTIRS Lw BE 41EPENDED GUE ro FMEEN Rmtrtm RHmTHOHK M.nI. FIRST RuxRF OCCURS R comNUnmH —FROM E °,NIL TFUM�E: CENTIMETER SHAt BE FOR FOR -I LflRTITHD ME FOLLOWING POLLOTION PET£HORG °¢NT 'rt'`s` CONTRACTOR ME A 'E COMMCTOR SNµL RNRZE ME IXP0SURC E AL PRODUCTS, MTDRULS. AND VUSTES FROu PIER MMM AIAY B[ A SOUNE OF IGNIMHMR TO S10RUWRER OR ME NOT DESIGNED TO BE —Z". STOPUwAFA. . B. BUILDING PRODUCTS TINT MAY LEACH MLLUTUFFS MUST BE UNDER CWER (PLABIIC SNEmNG. mHIR[sS:PRSON TEMPORMY RDGM ETC.) TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTAQS OR PROTEOT0 BY A SMLM, EFFEETTE DIEMS R9CNEO TD MNIMRE CONTAOT MM BIOPMWATER. 1fRMMHf: C. PESRCIDES. HEImICHIM INSECTICIDES. FERRUZERS, TRG'ENT CHEMICALS, MD UN ,E FEU- MATORLS MUST BE UNDER CWER (PIASNC SHERNC, TWPORMI' RODf3, Frc.) 1D PREVENT THE X CONiA.CT YDM STP0.RLMNNMi[Sn OR PROTECTED E A SIIAILMY EFFECmE uwK D[sIRXEO io ulxaxze CONTRACTOR'S ONSITE REPRESENTATIVE D. IPL.Hr UsmSTEipA NEIFIE IATE. (INCLUDING IL, DIESEL !EL MVNE, HIDMULIC iLUE, WJma55; E PREDMCIS. WOOD PRESEgvAOKS, wpmYES. CUPoxG COMPR— MD DIMS) MUST BE SIRED IN SEMED GRINNERS TO PEVfM SINUS. LENTS R App f5S STI R CENtt� DISPOSE OFF N,EEU pTWi wO1EEM LS�TUCUOENPBi YnM—NELG STµE IROImI)y ',� I— L SDR WINE MUST BE STORED, CDILECED, AND DISPOSED M CRIPLLNEE WIfN AL STAE ELM: EOUIEUUNIS. F. POMMLE TGREIS NUS! E PBSRmxm So TINT THEY ME BEEUEE Am waL NOT BE RIPPED OLIX SANONT' MSE NUS! BE DKPOSER E IN —RMNCE MM ALL STAE MMSRW NTT SHALL TAxP RFASOxARE STEM TO PREVENT ME .—CE OF SPEIID OR EGEONRICIp115N NS R[PRES[MANE STULL E L LEAH® CXf10G15, MCLUDIXG FLIER )ROY NL DIEM WIERE CNFUCAS R FUR DILL E LOMDD K[PI w ME CDHSTJwORMG DB UNLE THE CRITMCIpR YLpT COXDUn NFMNG IN A COMNNm AEA UNlF55 OIFTA51BlE T iNK IMOwUiMH SIIJL AL50 B[ PROwDED ro ME ME COxTRM100 MUST MRJE ODEOwTE wAILABIE AT AIL 1Mfs TO [LENT uP NM CML FIGGIE[A DKDI WIGNE, IlA1FmA1.5 AFm 1NA M MPR sRNJES ORE OMOAIE VMD' —"—1 K MMIABLE !OR EIOVRwp ED DIFR wNS. r ML SMLIS uIA E CIEANIm E ED EPRO[D M MCOPDMCE wlTx STATE MRMFM£ DRr CIEM R uEU1MES SHNL E LIED WHIRS POSEFIF. K COUNP —D ON THEE R0.1EE 9TG RLMOFF FNO� -S MIME MEA -R[°COMµ6.B IN A uEDIMEI11 WIN OR OTHER SU— UFLCINE CONTROLS MO WATE FOUR ME WASENG ALTMD' ST E PROPERLY RSPOSm E. ME CONT PACCO TINT PRR[EY uE AAm STOUR SOAPS, DnERCENTS. R.SOWFNTS. rv0 [xGWE EREASQGIT IS Al10ED Ox50E C ME CE, MIST PROVIDE UFEnWE COmEIMMEE FOR ALL UEUIT A!m SOLID WASTES _ER BY wASnwr aPEMTENS (c,xnmTe. sTlJtta, PMNT, MR. NELUSE OB£ OUTLAND COMPOUNDS, MD Oixpt CTNSMUrnON I.IATRMLS) aMTED TD ME PI✓DIECT CONSTRUCTION •' DESIGN, No WASxoR wM s MUSE coNTAn ME RoRD, AND THE Cp=.ENr MUST E DOUG EAT, SWDTB•M1ST[S MUST BESDISPOSED F PROPEEYHMp°N CE CDM WE CEBIRK µL NPCA _ • " RULES. A SIGN MUTE E MSTNLEU —CENT 10 Ewx Wg5H00oNACIUTY LNAi REOUIES SITE PERSONNEL R 10 WMZE PROPER FMULTIES FOR DSM— OF CRETE AND OTHER Wa4RUT eaClmnNn E5. ]. EINµ sTgaRl .• '�1�1 I. THE WCO eRACIR S— ENSURE FINN. STURLRATION O! ME 9TE FMµ S MILEER UT REQUIRES THE 4 AA IN— OF ]0 OL411M1 THE E...I IERNOYS SUN— TUS BEEN .LOMB EL AMRIUpMG STOHUIMON E All TIMES MD Swart { B. R 9ULL ENSURE TOLL PERMMEIQ STOOL FEN TRG1uEM SYSTEMS ARE - RIltTEO N ACCGTIpME MM ME EOMREMENTS E ME NPES PRMR Y L C CMT SOUL ERNE ALL mJPORMO SYxMCIC MD STMUCRRIAL MESS 0. COMIUCTGR SNNL NU AL SEMENTS Wca IA EO w BASIN. PFwNNI "' '•Ara + ELdm aVANAMm AR RFTFNnOx 4 -ME COMPMmR SxNl uNR ME SxPPP, .—D ML CERE1CAlES. RFPa015, ECCROS R OTHER B ]]]B W E6Eh BT NEWEST FOR 11 MEWMROIi CAF THE PENT Fm1 OR tiNfE YEAaL S�FOLL00 C nQ IMBUBUm/110.L 10 iIg CAS p '(_ -S'.. - f�!I NL NE OF TERWURRG. -ME RHIRACTOR SXNL UME ME RESPONSIBLE PERSON, TRUED M EOUOED E MCI PERMIT, v A ARJDLE R SITE NN— TJ HOURS LINEN REE ESTED BY ME RSPCA FOR M ONSHE --TOR H. NINE CDNiMLTOR LUST MEOW ACCEBS M REQUIRED E STATE RECWTUMS MR RmESTNTAT— OF ^ - JU1wJN4nln E MP" R ANT MEMBER MEEOI W.EN M ORRm E R. TO ENTER UPON THE PROJECT SITE FOR ME PURPOSE OBTmMKG INFRwRMC EMINUTIDN OP RECORDS OR CROUCRO SURVEY OR INVCSTIDA00N5. w � = I NPERMO EETNUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TRMIwimN (NOT) TRHN OD DAIS IF ONE ON MORE OF THE FOLLOWMO CONDITIONS DIVE BEEN MC: 1' a M VERE cwpulc HE RE.— o uL TEMPOLURes.—R..M ENE FOR 9 SIILL]T' FFEETICICEE.. M SITE LOCATION MAP 2. iWµ EfM¢1GNOXAT --ED µt PDRNWI OF ME SE RMT — NOT ACMNED n0I 10 SWOT -ME PER NMUST AMEMO ME B—P M NECESSMY TO TRUE MRMRNA. IMMUREMENT, SM,N AS OMOm BUR. .—ED IG mRECT PROOL�S --. R —LESS NDAROns - wMTnDWN- mEREI T. RETIE 6 A CHINE IN R9R. CONSTRUCTION ON N. R[MR E. R ECR. MCL PIF.ED OR SEASONµ rMmonRw .ailA¢vMMrtTE 4 aNMEnsNRINH:E IGSPErnR K REauwm mmux.xa HmurK + 'ACREAGE SUMMARY wrN MwNWGUS „mss y"Pi 2INSP[CTS R NVECIRR, BY SITE OPEMTORS, LOCAL. STATE R imCPAI 6SIDIAL4 INM('AlE lle^' SITUP K NE ER[CTNL AAE . AyEs 1 MUME EWPR IS NET ACHRVIW THE CENEML OBJ6TNE5 E CRPRRLINO POLLEANTS R RE sTwNL)S' I CRSSRENT — THE TORUS AND ED—. S OP MS PRYIT. a. NE UPC+ O[IEWONFN TUT DKCNARE uA r•.,a R CONQINBW[ ro NR -AMAIOI�G�� MPUCAiLE wAIR OLLUIIY STAImARO$ OR ME Ew14P IDES NOT MORPORAlEa116.TE01M¢NMIS� RELATED To M APPREMED r MANUDU IM- Law (TwL), SOCIA710N I HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP �w As) - THIS ERINUTER PGLLIITMx PNEVEIITEN Ixw was RR•IE� TRAnm AC RpMCE MM ME PRMIPS TMININO REORREMENTB FOq..NI(P OF SwRPS. IN U REPAmxa MS —P: : j +s av EST MATED P QUANTITIES \ E�YEl.D)LYE ice: �MYIy LEERiuLh7 yNxIY9,LrCyrF Bnny S i \\ H— CMONER, P.E. RAE R THAMNC /CEROFICARON: SEPIENOER 1-14 301] 1 FREE REAM �)S PIERCE PRO AND ASSOCIATES PROGRM; UNIVERSITY OF RNNESEA _ Ox FNTIIWt[ R NMNOPERCEPIIHCR ESON OF CONSTRIICTIUH SWPPP )N- SST -IDII LOCAMN: MDR HILLS, MIT MSTflUCOR: JUHN CHMMON sIWACOMPR BWNC R BY I MIT ROECRR a TEAM ENr—DM IXNMTIDX: 301] - I, 1 X} �•) NINE DuNITQESAEmR UEOMNmXµ PURPOSED RAY. CONTMAOR SRLLL nNE1EIwu¢ i1XEN56VE'3 THE EKMI ... T.L.Olm FOR 66 West Apartments 3=N81 "SE M'ee1 EC. I I ! I MI TAP CESTXD la• pm WAmWDI AND wefN1 Nm 6• D9 IwE St]MC£ AND POST I - wNGTDP vAIVE, SEE DEIAR a /C600. . '. .. i I 1 - I � z - mm "o x• carom WA)m smn¢ Pro alecwu, wmnwo Puxs, rmn wav E..cr iDGTmn I AI AND sac. p]S1P1a Y SEPNM TO 9E USID MR -RC WA1EA SVPRY. $FE ISOWDGV. I I ` - � .¢urns Oe51wG A• sunwrt StIMfE Arm ws]AU nm a• Pve sAlaaPr s)mn¢ N I s� ExRlDO C PYC DN - Nix.]x, Nm a• PVC wV . B)x28 I. _ .. ; B '+ w5TN1 y li. e• PVC mR -2e SAMOP! SElCP AT I.xei 1. I b. iN.VI 9• Pvt SANNAM wv . 0]]S2 M00IIUiE�E11ICf IDGIIOx AND ervmr NiN IIIExuaUx - a ). wSTALL ATPeW OIIA01 w WEGaN NELL 101 . B]L•, wV - Bl).00. 4E DETAIL B /C6T0 O.. 6 w5TN1 xp V e• PVC $lalw SCMfl1 AT ILW UNE/AN.5 � � 9.. aRTALLAlPNN1 DNaI w WVOpN NEIL. PY . Hxe3 wI . 879.)1, � DEiw 9/C60a .............. °o. wsou Ix] a PC swo sENm AT IDDi swsrlLL 2Y. muFlm Nri0PLA41 DPAw gi MIII SaIID 110. Pro . 9M.z, wV . MM. ;lrP • e)sse. sa sxECl c9DZ _ z. V c we sra1N smm AT I.DOS - w�AW.r�lwe"W`) ' 7 � I QI wumm rmaPUir m.N BlsIIl rmm swm w. Iml eBl3. Dry . milo. p I[FL u we' : me.lo. s¢ sxar caaz. Si I I v • Corela] I °N°av� PnIST 1� a" .un` "PE a "Dm mao` smcwu` PIERCE PINI $ Is. caa owu r¢w Norm wrmr D+rD nm�nc Gml eASVI $ O[ i wP . , ASSOCIATES, I �mwmm Li19 _ 4 PNEVMINMY:Z - mD , NOT FOII t I , � �n CONSIpUCIION .. IIF y€ Ij��jl $8 s I e ] °Ael 0 0. PWEST 66TH STREET y,9. unury PLAN ' wm �IvUTILiT PLAN N, PRELIMINARY C46( ® _ r NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION o xV 40' uxueLE ama, uArcx msnxc smF u+o ¢FWIIpN anon Rcxr -m -war AxCR cope Mo Gmf SFF pETaL s /Cfiol Fn: IX11vflYpT MRpH, SFE pEfaL 5 /Capp IMS —EM. — DML 1 /Capp M $IDMAW, SEE DML J /CFpo Ea FFYFLn'NT. SEE DU p /Capp xosC4PM. —S fpR axE RRLIf AEfl'E LUCPnoxe c.Lm spRroixc. r rELL.W ¢FORT FuM, ttwrx eai cpuM MRwwc..• rmnE FFOVT FaM Jaa.. MDOl SEE MML 7 /CM Jaw. -N. SEE pEfat a /Ce ALW —P. eEE pFfaL 6/Calp AULnIAa. FON muR p¢MS ApSfi�N. FOA lwxpaR wELL A r l , mom .r ®PAVING EVAN PRELUMINA Y NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION zn XRH SPEL. .— (OR WOOD) POST OR Sf E THRILL °� DY CAL49RATIOx' 6Y ACCEPTED DESIGN PPACTICES F—C A HDRUE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS SBi FENCE —E EOUALES z R.FOR a EVENT TRd BACNFlLL V6M Fr TAWED NAIVHN. SOIL 1. 9R.i FENEES ON WOU SXOUID BE ED TO UP UI OPPOSED f0 OP AD III ROW M DDI A DI FLOW cwxm amass 11¢ Eros lO1U A MW AN OONS1RUmE0 ND RIlR - - nH� P z. IRSURIFl1 1H`H IIII ILNRE 11" 111 1 OF FENCE. I_ Rro R NAXE TXE —a.--.E 0 -YFM P— STORM RUNOFF. NANML SOIL 'T xmE+ MT FENLE Sl N FOLLOW - , I �E Ill RUXOFF IS TO RE STORED M INS RE THE YAMNLIM SLOFE lIIiOTX BCXWD f10 fa SECN ]66fi. ME FMCS OmS NOT [XCFEO 1HE FILURE 1 Mx:N. ORST —VIOLA FOR SILT FENCE - F1Gr10N5 SNOWN IN TAME 1. - TALE I NAIDUUM SLOPE LENGTH AND SLOPE FOR WHICH s T: FENCE IS APPIECNIE ' . RY CN.CULAnON DY CAL49RATIOx' 6Y ACCEPTED DESIGN PPACTICES H V PE PCIRCCNf SBi FENCE —E EOUALES z R.FOR a EVENT SILT.fE2GE STOPILE COUALS E R FOR A 2 -YEAR EVENT tli.] R FOR A 100 -YEM EVEIII M�/ATMWE SLOPE M SEWER O DRNN ' OO R BDI 29 Rro R ;N� >8 R ATRIUM WITH ELBOW 1 125 R 15 R 20:1 5% 60 R IN R 1' 50 R I7:1 6% 61 R 150 FT 50 R - 12.5:1 BR 50 R 112 R 5a R TOR Do R s0 -ZS R A R 25_12 R 2SR Ib R ]0 R 19 R }1 3]R 12 R 22 FT IS R 21 AR 6 R HEAVY DUTY. SILT FENCE DETAIL 60 - No sTa.E s4!s!� IRIPENED It— ""E` AT DIE DSCREDON OF TNE 1/3 OF 2/3 or LED E, - I 1COIR LOG \(•ROrt/ �Xp "fit NO xal.L 2• WASHED /LOIIMIE 12' 1XRYf O�O�� MINWUN GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ENTRANCE fi ND SFx[ 1. OIL ASORBEM PUM St— BE RIBIWIR) AM RE PACED . 2. E INNER ASy`MURPALNRED BY a• PRen :t'rt :+e AEDUNNEW GTCHB SW EROSION CONOIDL INSERT IrtT o0 OR ] PNWUCT W BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FR04 INGI EER. i21CB INSERT EROSION CONTROL 60 No SCND L H rrc`a`EAREUENTS {I DA Ex fi TE v DVE Box B•_U• �- •O• . I N0. b ROUIN BASE 5 ox SHAFT BURRO BOX UNDISNRDED SoD.�LrI -* 9�acH POST INDICATOR VALVE a No sI- Nos Auns oF—D ElDR ullni'11. uv. SLOPE TOLPUX ' X" S-O =E TO pXNN rou.P- D'So. NUa BRAD1 MSER PIPE TH AS REQUIRED) OR APPROVED M SEWER O DRNN AUD DRUN PIPE USICD AND ONFXTED ~GRATE ATRIUM WITH ELBOW 60 NO SME \ a.PLES Iaiw�wED Un;�i Lj .C'/ . IFN6VERSE SEWS \ /�• \`j/ �� fI.NRNfT NAT[iW. 7- wE LE, AT 1rA.sr b' Axo �YYY' / /// �•� m��WSFrIED TIOIDRd. . INJNNN SPNXNI OF 20' Y MAi � i NWWw SFA4s:( w�i Nfl I[M1L NVST AT END BL SLOPE —LES A} LEAST b' LAID SECURE BLNIRR ST6O FlESDImSER1FD' RWd NATPUES m 20` STPPIES NSOm 20' - NADINY SPACWC m 00' APAI 1HR000H i12 xOTES: APART 1. 5:1 AND LQNDIIIL RB— O eR GTEOORY .- CO[oNUF 23FFOR s1OPf5 4NGTp1 r1Wi 4DE5 Ar0 2S FOR OF SU URAINAS RU,R AND RDNOWO 5— NM � LORI' T -SIMW zs FOR ICE SLOPES 1F55 DMN 5:1 PER NNroT SPEC. SECII0IR 2. AlE P[A MNOm SPEC. SLCtMN 2115 �1EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET 60 1WO REED EAmx , POVND fAMC� a OCRs BEARING AREA OF BLOCK IN sO. Fr. g�NO uiO °� . so KENO Xr 6EM1 � :w =- to' am 2 9.2 7, 1. COND1AOfOR MAY PROWDE LCGWC ]OM R�iSSBUeR A4 AN STERNA . CRE2 HRUS B D X5. 11E MMOXIN — "' Ma 1�Y nTYPICAL THRUSTNBLOCK. ^DELAIL 60 No SCNE ��ATRnw PoLYOLEF u mu�iwrrEUV. J li ' PE TO DR S6OPE TD &M . _ _-N�- CO1PpcTEO sOIL y A POIE ( . PEE..U..) OR APPROVED g E Os sAxrtARr sE\xR AO DMUx ',T=' E W APPR0.�ED CWNALFNI SORER AVD DRNN PIPE CRUSHED ARD roMPAETm PRELIMINARY DATRIUM GRATE WITH TEE cs No snaE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 66 West Apartrnents ]SW B61N SL Weal. EIDOR .. U—. AWOiVN1A 1111 �1'!»re1 OON9ULTUYF PIERCE PINT & A550CIATE5 PRELNIINMT NOT FOR CONSTfROCT1ON ' 10N� At CIVIL DETAILS C60( ce0f V dnIYNOUS BamNO cOURJF NINDIN 2360, (SPNWBJTOB) 22' &N OUS PIF/IaNC CWT(SE vw (srrawwae) �PBIERIIUIlWS 2 COAT '9' C018ALTm tt. SS PoSE (IOOY (aVSMm) TBmOi JIJO. _T I LEOiECIUN-�- ¢.OXOD FADE PCA - WCLL PEPOPr BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL ' wPnANO cENErrr � , 9' CUNPACICD CLASS s �(1 �cPUSi¢n m couPAClm suncPABE IaER Ll'ATECNWCAL REPORr NOTES: PROwOE CONmALnON JONIS AT IE as .... l eorx ollELnoxs r2 RETE PAVEMENT a9ASVa]n � CUPO NN WrrOl -- - - -- r nAOUS -' BACN 01' 01 r 1 .mfrs \ r ( `.Lnmm�cow Pnrvcrz xnu L .=TC -ut LAYOUT Q `\ uµl�nnaADVnr 1'ATII OOULevmo. / I' ' s e w [slRlmso Eara SECTION THRU WALK 2 wHFN POS�IE. PnDaIE A TEAR PAM o< TPAKL MDE PEO[SITdW A OP CURB Roo MAT 4- X 4 PCUINLLY MT A' Y A' WRL µLOW YAallgiy5 NNEE SIGINLS, CAHaalS, A, 0 NN &W W OF oR OTVrePwaw. ovs'ia�isii An[ A[[ax[D w THE Rua DP PAIN z PI.Y.E TAE OEIC— eAneslG Umr¢Arm OOlGS) AT TxE BA OF NPB. N'HDI lIE • murnnall -. N` *W} r a� Ere am "L+\Au u.°'E NQTLSE +� r nnwlnm w Lac rLUW atn Pumrmr or .n+N Aln DIr WW6 all (vWilrONwl IY DTRYEWnYa O IR• f3fNIEWII aNE In' NID9RS0 ,YLI CURD RETURN, HALF PLAN CONCRETE (2' VAMID AGGREGATE CONCRETE rIIALN unWnUl, nK]Ir0 u La Dsomm cn01 BLVD. rATT 9' WALIt,) f OIIIWIC ANGO ARS Pmµ[D lL`AMRY). . DNKDAY P.1M01r AT 110 R I1V. (-I-) Q rRAt�. _ wNNYIud,W119 1' wlnitNO l+P Oj WTtXIYIWAYt WnNIYAYqcWuLU (0. 11 ., Co.-) N- to us WWKWTf4 aao rT.m. norE� l/r m am'aul, ' Lnmsx nA'AU w as — s sw TAM TADYCEM 9OE TIµ% Is A pµIX COLg1 (TRn OP LA+» wxF rNE A,v.¢.n smLwuN W A USM FAY Clu,m COLOR. rA [plDlYlY PAw n . . •. relx:e. Pwr nUuDm (D ss ruo iNnir rc 1mD 3uA 1". ImAUJ SEC110N A -A � ui`NOt m vY 50-' FUIn'n�ol x AN'G cE uE OPT Ct��nwuma[m 'APRON CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE TROWELED ufrnamNr ArpwA wro W AND MATCH EXISTING DRIYEIYAY PATTERN. OTHER AINI new rL ARW, up01 NMIaIWe 18YIWR CONCRETE NEWT JOINT JOINTS SHALL MATCH 1HE D lIR FYKfe NCUlaurc imlX On GOI ,.�IpE pF 4'IY DRM1£mT EXISTING DRIVEWAY JOINT Ppl'1EHN ARID STYLE. Q a - AKDtnE '� vRU[[�Llvluiv�m YIAU IIAK E w -11 J uABC WID OE f11 ,7w �,;; CITY OF EDINA rwi °-'•� ENGINEERING PSI OVISE uensLO: STAHDAflO PLATE `e I-.Y -I. A & PUBLJC s)�J.+y' WDRKS 6NQ ,G DEPTS. _ MOKIn r. 410 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON C60 NO SCALE ErNallOUS " G ARD r • 2' a' AGCR-TE O. SE SEE AYWL PI/N J' R 1 GMOE nR 9LOPf PIN S—G PVN CONCRETE (�1CURB & GUTTER (B612� C60 xo scuE w 1 /A' /R. SLOPE NON- nEO1i91tLID �tDHCREI[ wALN y ��ODPACTED LPUnRAA 845E PlCTD SuBGRAD[ SECTIO Jn- 3 TAEµ JaM RLI£A - D�ADiN�" - F TO - CONTRACTON JOINT E %PANCION �IONT µ 5' O.a WIRNUU ni 30' OL. WYNII )CONCRETE WALK & JOINT DETAILS C60 No SCALE wxlrt sTma HC PARKING SYMBOL C60f xD star TO E S NOUTES lc TO suT[ slnures SEE DRM ctuTfO vAH KgSSIBIf 4:�� LMG E IECDIO um IaonDER 0 2 �WLYIr OV3 ,,`` CrluPoSmi I THE `� SS� W V son B'a 13Y` - _ A SEE PUN wAUt, Ag•_j• 1� rn�' STPw K r '1 Nu[ Y [AAAI[TER CONCRETE TOI—G - - uUTmisi�D�m AND ro %)ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL BRAIN GARDEN 1 NO S E C60 NO SCµ A, n0 E BACN 01' ro a-L, - TNE AWEIW<r6 D15ABfR6 ALT NuRY nllx Tay SIAmMp PU C85 APE 11[PYxCD TO � O 1. Y3NCl1 PCTrlalEp Wln f4IFn u.ATEiYE AAanO iPOM a— 2 wHFN POS�IE. PnDaIE A TEAR PAM o< TPAKL MDE PEO[SITdW A OP CURB Roo MAT 4- X 4 PCUINLLY MT A' Y A' WRL µLOW YAallgiy5 NNEE SIGINLS, CAHaalS, A, 0 NN &W W OF oR OTVrePwaw. ovs'ia�isii An[ A[[ax[D w THE Rua DP PAIN z PI.Y.E TAE OEIC— eAneslG Umr¢Arm OOlGS) AT TxE BA OF NPB. N'HDI lIE -csY of IN D� crAalE swu eE xum aDPoreo rD rxL iNE eFASXE Dln¢ uQ ,A- • . N•OVP. A ADA NOVaQD TNWCON DN¢ µEA Sxµ1 BE OPEpIOx 6 iMYR µA SxALL CONTRAST —A.LY MM 1NE ADLLDO WµWNG naACL E FNME 1PUxCATED O" ARU DOME SI7F DOME SPACING m swu DE A ucxr (LNAY F BurO coLDN wTWN ©PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP TAM TADYCEM 9OE TIµ% Is A pµIX COLg1 (TRn OP LA+» wxF rNE A,v.¢.n smLwuN W A USM FAY Clu,m COLOR. Cho NO SCALE wxlrt sTma HC PARKING SYMBOL C60f xD star TO E S NOUTES lc TO suT[ slnures SEE DRM ctuTfO vAH KgSSIBIf 4:�� LMG E IECDIO um IaonDER 0 2 �WLYIr OV3 ,,`` CrluPoSmi I THE `� SS� W V son B'a 13Y` - _ A SEE PUN wAUt, Ag•_j• 1� rn�' STPw K r '1 Nu[ Y [AAAI[TER CONCRETE TOI—G - - uUTmisi�D�m AND ro %)ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL BRAIN GARDEN 1 NO S E C60 NO SCµ NYLOPLAST. DRAIN BASIN WITH SOLID COVER - (1,2) INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRON MATERIAL 313OVEROMAVE r� BUFORD,GA30111,• p7 PNN D'NI.4.Q . NylO sfTECHNICAL FRAME & COVER TO MATCH BASIN O.D. PROJECTNOJNIWE TITLE GRAN BASNYA7H IDLED pNCNSPECN ITHSOL ETALL CONTANEDHEREN ,ORMANUFACRIREOFAINY ARRCLEHMEFROM ,FORTHEDISCLOSUREMMHEAS PERMISSION FROMPTBYSPECIFIC WWITEN PERMISSION FROM NYLDPIASi. omlamtwAT DATE 11410 18' MIN V40TH GUIDELINE DWOSRE- . A SCALE 1:40 .SHEET. 10F1 8' MIN THICIMESS GUIDELME MINIMUM PINE BURIAL DEPTH PER PIPE (3) VARABLE INVERT HEIGHTS MANUFACTURER RAN ' AVAILABLE (ACCORDING TO N A 7) TRAFFIC LOADS: CONCRETE SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR PLANSRAKE OFF) (MIN. MANUFACTURING GUIDELINE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL CONCRETE SLAB MUST BE - RED. SAME AS MIN. SUMP) DESIGNED TAIONG IMO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOL CONDITIONS, - 960' TRAFFIC LOADING, B OTHER APPLICABLE DESIGN FACTORS ACCOffOINGTO SEE DRAWING NO. 7D01- 110411 FOR NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION. PLANS zow _ - (3) VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH - RATING ACCORDING TO PLANS L S - 0 _ (E MIN.ON 10' N 30' - - 4 VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUiLETADAPTERB O 4'M IN ON 8' -24' - BASED ON MANUFACTURING RED.)• AVAI ABLE.4' -30' FOR CORRUGATED HOPE 6' MIN ON 30' _ -_ (ADS N- 12MMCOR DUAL WALL, ADSMANCOR SINGLE WALL). N-12 HP, PVC SEWER (M SDR 39 Jfi PVC DWV(EX SCH 40), PVC C900005, a CORRUGATED B RIBBED PVC THE BACIffILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETINGTHE REQUIREMENTS OF CUSS O WATERTIGHT JOINT MATERULLAS DEFINED M ASTM D2321. BEDDING 8 BACKFILL FOR - - - (CORRUGATED HOPE SHOWN) SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED 8 COMPACTED B`- 30' UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. 1 - B' -3P SOLID COVERS SHALL BE DUCTILE RON PERASTMASM GRADE 765904. 2 - 1T -30' FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE WON PERASTMA535GME706M W S UrSOUDCOVERS FR DIRECILYONTO DRAW BASINS WITITHEUSE OF APVCBOOYTOP. BEE DRAWING N0.7001- 11DM3- 3 - DRAIN BASIN TO BECUS70M MPNUFACRIREDAOCOROWGTOPLAN DETAILS. RISERSARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER54• DUETO SHIPPMG RESECTIONS. SEE DRAWING NO. TW141MM 4 - DRAMAGECONNECTION STUBJ01N7TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORMTO ASTM M212 FOR CORIWGATED HOPE (ADS 11- 124MOOR DUAL WALL(. ADAPTERS CAN MOUNTED ' 5 - ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0' 1D 350': TD DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001410M2 B - 12'- 3TSOUD COVERS SHALL MEET H-20 LOAD RATING. . . 7 - B'a16'SOLD COVERS ARE RATED FOR UGHTDUIYAPPUCA71ONS ON-Y. NO CONCRETE COLLAR NEEDED FOR LICHT DLTrY RATING. THIS PRINT DISCLOSES WLIECTMAT7ERM WHICH NYLOPlASTHASPROPRIETARYWGHM .TIIERECEPT ORPOSSESSION OFTHI9 PRINT DOES NOTCIN4ER. TRANSFER OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN OR INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN - REPRODUCTION OFTIDS PRITr ORANYNFORMATION DRAWNBY EBC DATE 9.1447 MATERIAL 313OVEROMAVE r� BUFORD,GA30111,• p7 PNN D'NI.4.Q . NylO sfTECHNICAL REVNSMBY EBC PROJECTNOJNIWE TITLE GRAN BASNYA7H IDLED pNCNSPECN ITHSOL ETALL CONTANEDHEREN ,ORMANUFACRIREOFAINY ARRCLEHMEFROM ,FORTHEDISCLOSUREMMHEAS PERMISSION FROMPTBYSPECIFIC WWITEN PERMISSION FROM NYLDPIASi. omlamtwAT DATE 11410 DWOSRE- . A SCALE 1:40 .SHEET. 10F1 DWO NO: - iC01. 116293 REV B' 66 West Apartments atTO Sanaww.Em® U MAN Lili;^ PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION d� " cl— l� CIVIL DETAILS PRELIMINARY 060: NOT FOH OONSTAUCTtON Y COMMERCIAL z STORE COMMERCIAL 1 STERY i stom ' ,VMeMsTFEk, MR, AREA RR RAN - \ `� �•�� SOUTHDALE CENTER .`� ULTIFAMI HOUSING BMW IULTIFAMII Y HOUSING z eiom ..COMMERCIAL asTcm i COMMERCIAL PLAN t-u W MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STO t 66 West Apartments = -Mb M. W.A Emma V — Fuse COMMERCIAL 2 STORY ARCHITECTUR SrrE PLAN LA1 0( L'u-4 BARRIE ROAD Mom WE MUM a mi------- ------ ------- 0 mmaoEamroloxw W&F t-u W MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STO t 66 West Apartments = -Mb M. W.A Emma V — Fuse COMMERCIAL 2 STORY ARCHITECTUR SrrE PLAN LA1 0( L'u-4 SECTION AT WEST WINDOW WELL lQ LANDSCAPE SECTIONS -86.5 SECTION AT SOUTH PATIO TO CITY SIDEWALK �1 LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANTING DETAILS 66 West Apartments avo emn s. wnt Fss�a uwe�eraraos;: �: fbNO TPM Green 0 0� SNBNp0FYLL1Y PLANTING /SITE PLAN L3®® waw urtoen nwe sc �O cnn @) RAM GARDEN PLANTING DETAIL N L 0. !, MOVALS/PRESERVATON PLAN 66 West Apartments 9330 SM St.W 1.E I^ MA�iw esa, �u v CwanLTANf PLANT REMOVA4 PRESERVATION PLAN L301 A001.1 - SUBLEVEL 1 GENERAL NOTES: �. n. +umara•rmwmwwa.�roanaerr�rcn•.nm wrxman •r wme3a wa uE ro mnouc a wai a onoeeanvmmawaremmnm�euwwa � Flare Mrv�4Y/1H�in�e' I�MttW 1rwYign.wl�1M � Mrnp Mm � - ...•yp1�gM1FO !. aMK�anOl ,Y/nuO.vFwtlwLmentEfi�tb� � e �IFX906C041IAEM6�ffpN I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I�A Od80V! I ___J'_____ �\ 66 West Apartments 3MO 661h St. MsL E&,, 7 Ei PFELIMINAFY '� NOTFON �CO_NSTHULTIONj SUBLEVEL PLAN A001 GENERAL NOTES: 66 West Apartments t WfMWNOnwmvueucman�rKays(uuM M. fiRih SL West Edon x MOO�wlremm�wxvwu DWapOISYO �006mmI1Ep�E 6 nw! a EIIFI0N19ViifmlYO IDE0i1�60fgXNpOimP x �MINis1N.m�EICROM mlRRxwo MnM _ � M1Mime�CR1VO 1PiF9�1URn i. .vE TIEe.�E WF9011OeQ10rto ---_------------------------------------------------------ - - - --- — NW�OW11FOrR — – – — – – — – – — – – . otmB0000uM[m �¢aaN � . nROM.atl 001 - u I�\ uwa�ouirm svoi awxoa a o - UP�d owuuwtt • '. ornv ana apsics ants i IF_II__ J II -. n . r .ui • .. � '_II�p� L n�,.n �J�9���II _f�Il�- . ` 1�1(!rI ! Ilf. I�� —�� R P. NN LPL 1 PLAN ----------------------------------- -- --------- -------------- - -- --- --- h -� -- " J \a Al 01 �LEVELiPWV ., ., i GENERAL NOTES: �. uumnn•imwa.wune . oana°.o : vw.nca ° O�m�sMnUm OflavnnETOmnva°FVwuu �. a�noor�ea°wnua1p �.u.nvae6osocawnwm ° �w�'vnwnm0em me�'"irio�'reewra�r+awva ° wnn��. �i 'wmo°V°'nu:iv�ao °m�Mro�m e. nmmncauuxemrrmuaw 1— k 66 West Apartments 3M 66th 51. W°sL Ed \tl LEVEL 2 PLAN Al O6 0 ®TPE A UNIT - TYPE W UNIT NOTES: KEYNOTES: J iwicAL UNT - ENLARGED UNIT PLANS A151 �W- I EXISTING BRICK METAL PANEL - VERTICAL I VINYL DOUBLEHLING WINDOW al DARK BRICK 66 West Apartments — 60111.^.'. Weal, Eft. II NOT FOR EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS A30C woi METAL PANEL • HORIZONTAL 66 West Apartments — 60111.^.'. Weal, Eft. II NOT FOR EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS A30C �SOy ELEVATION ELEVATION Z— -- 66 West Apartments 3330 6611, St. West. Edina URB�NVlf ®FF.;.., BUILDING ELEVATIONS ELEVATION FAST ELEVATION 66 West Apartments 3336 661h Sl. WIlt, Edill NOTFOR ... ...... BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDING "A 66 West Apartments MO 66th St. West, Edina J� ly- tz BUILDING PERSPECTIVE 66 West Apartments 3aio eem s1 weal, same —T.T 3-7 M- MY —.2 —.Y�a r I., b. 4,y L2 }.l b. .—J t12 b., b.. 1. 1,, b., b.. I., I.,, L. L, N., 16 b., b... b.. 1,1 1*1 1,1 1,7 ➢,1 1,. :.1 U Tn!� NA S.l 1.1 1.. S.7 I.. M b.. b:: b.s S.I V . b.. . 2 .- Llr--- %.. I.. b. ' b., I.. S.. 4., k.a . b.. b., b.a O.s - lt.2 1.1 1.. P.7 L -LJ : ki . L7 L . . .. 7 li4 L 2: b. I. a.a b.4 b.4 b.. b., i.x I.. l.a I.. ➢ A L. b.4b.. ..6 a.. a.b a.. ..a 4 SITE LIGHTING PLAN WITH PHOTOMETRICS Ile LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE Q V Up a- SITE LIGHTING al— Z PLAN WITH --I TILT PHOTOMETRIC --Imm E—L-1c DATE: July 15, 2014 T®: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: Chad Millner —City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 3330 66th Street West — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. I. City Standard Plates available here: http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section= construction standards 2. A separate permit is required from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District: www.ninemilecreek.org Survey 3. No comments. Soils 4. Submit soils, soil boring and geotechnical report. Details 5. No comments Traffic and Street 6. A traffic study has been reviewed and shows no undue burden on the transportation network. 7. Show replacement of brick sidewalk with salvaged or like for utility service crossing location. 8. Show replacement of concrete sidewalk with like for utility service crossing location. 9. Commercial entrance should follow standard plate 400 and 410. Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Verify location, and remove moribund water service on southwest property corner to main if it exists. Storm Water Utility 11. Provide hydraulic and hydrology calculations that meet Nine Mile Creek Watershed District standards. Capacity is available in public stormwater system from NC -I I I subwatershed, downstream of project. 12. Provide copies of maintenance agreement for private stormwater systems. 13. A revised SAC unit determination will be required at building permit application. 14. Provide drainage outlet from raingarden. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 15. No comments. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov a 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 �'0�1, nk�1611�;5%1� Other Agency Coordination 16. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits may be required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, MInnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 ��7 D 1 EDINA (C 1-,� H66th 51� W661h Si •� i � « � 1 ! 1 i 11J10thS1 I '.'dl. Y' �• - FIN ri. �k�GGlt� y Executive Summary Background. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon) is proposing to develop a 39 unit apartment building at the site of an existing TCF Bank located northeast of the 66th Street/Barrie Road intersection in Edina, MN. The purpose of this study is to determine if transportation improvements are needed to accommodate the proposed building and to ensure there will be adequate parking available on site after the apartment building is fully occupied. Results: The traffic impacts of the proposed apartment building on the study intersections were analyzed in the 2015 build -out conditions. The principal findings are: i. The forecast traffic from the proposed development will have little impact on the operations of the study intersections. ii. All study intersections will operate acceptably through the 2015 build -out scenarios. iii. The proposed 19 unit parking lot is forecast to be adequate for the 66 West Apartment building. Recommendations: Other than the proposed changes of closing the east leg of the existing site southern driveway and converting the northern driveway to a full access intersection, no modifications are needed to be made by the developer to the study intersections. Traffic Impact Study i q 66 West Apartments �� 1 TACKLE OP CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..:::............. 2. Proposed Development: ............................................................ I 3. Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions .... ............................... 2 4. Projected Traffic .............. .:.:.................... ............................... 3 ff 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis for 2034 Scenarios ........... 5 6. Parking Analysis.::. : :.:....::..... .... 5 i. Conclusions and Recommendations...:: ... ..................:.:.......... 6 8. A pp endix......... LIST OF TABLES Table 1 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)' ....... ..............................3 Table 2 — 2015 Build Level of Service (LOS), ..................... ..............................5 Table 3 — Existing Parking Lot Counts ................................ ..............................6 Traffic Impact Study 66 West Apartments 1. Introduction a. Purpose of Study Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon) is proposing to develop a 39 unit apartment building at the site of an existing TCF Bank located northeast of the 66th Street/Barrie Road intersection in Edina, MN. The purpose of this study is to determine if transportation improvements are needed to accommodate the proposed building and to ensure there will be adequate parking available on site after the apartment building is fully occupied. b. Study Objectives The objectives of this study are: i. Document how the study intersections currently operate. ii. Forecast the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. iii. Determine how the study intersections will operate in the year 2015 with development traffic. iv. - Determine if there will be adequate parking on site when the apartment is fully occupied. v. Recommend improvements, if needed. The study intersections are: i. 66th Street/Barrie Road ii. Barrie Road /Existing Southern Site Access iii. Barrie Road /Existing Northern Site Access 2. Proposed Development a. Site Location The site is located north of the Southdale Shopping Center on the northeast corner of the 66th Street/Barrie Road intersection in Edina, MN (see Figure 1 in the Appendix). b. Land Use Intensity and Development Timing The proposed site will have 39 apartment units. The site is currently being used as a TCF Bank with a drive through. The existing bank building will be remodeled and an addition will be constructed to make up the apartment building. Site access will be via the Barrie Road /Existing Northern Site Access intersection. The Existing Southern Site Access east leg will be removed as part of the development. The site is proposed to have a 19 stall parking lot. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2 in the Appendix. Traffic Impact Study 1 66 West Apartments A5'1 5'1 For the purposes of this study, the development.is anticipated to be built and fully occupied by the year 2015. 3. Analysis of EAsting Traffic Conditions a. Transportation Network Characteristics 66th Street West is also Hennepin County State Aid Highway 53. It is a divided road with five lanes (three westbound 'and two eastbound) and a 35 mph speed limit near the site. According to MnDOT it has. an average of 16,000 vehicles per day using it near the site. Barrie Road is a local Edina road. It is a two lane, undivided road with a 30 mph speed limit near the site. All of the study intersections are two -way stop controlled with stop signs on the minor approaches. The 66th Street/Barrie Road intersection is a 3/ intersection restricting vehicles from making left turns or through movements from Barrie Road. Existing traffic control and travel lanes are ..shown in Figure 3 in the Appendix for each study intersection. b. Traffic Volumes Intersection video was collected at each of the study intersections under normal weekday conditions in June 2014 when there was clear weather. Using these videos, turning movement counts were collected from 6:30 to 9:30 a.m. and from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. at the three existing study intersections. The peak hours for each intersection were found to be- 0 66th Street/Barrie Road: 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. and 4:15 to 5:15 p.m. Barrie Road /Existing Southern Site Access: 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Barrie Road /Existing Northern Site Access: 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The turning movement count data from the counts are contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. Traffic Impact Study 2 66 West Apartments c. Level of Service LOS - °— An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Intersections are assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS Los c " A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is typically considered acceptable in the .. Twin Cities region. Individual movements are also LOS o= Accepta`bte ' assigned LOS grades. One or more individual t �0„ ;:r'1 movements typically operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. y The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall LOS F = Unaccepfa'bt® intersection operation, not individual movements. 3 The LOS results for the existing study hours are shown in Table 1. These are based on the existing Source: city of traffic control and lane configurations as shown in San Jose, CA Figure 3 in the Appendix. The existing turning movement volumes from the Appendix were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 using VISTROTM software. The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. The study intersections currently operate acceptably at LOS A or better with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Table 1 – Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)' 66th St/Barrie Rd A c A b Barrie Rd/Existing Southern Site Access A b A b Barrie Rd /Existing Northern Site Access A (a) A (b)_ 'The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. The second letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. 4. Projected Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the development site based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Traffic Impact Study 3 45� 66 West Apartments Edition. Based on Land Use Code 220, the 39 unit apartment building will generate: 0 130 vehicles entering and 130 vehicles exiting the subdivision per day 0 4.vehicles entering and 16 vehicles exiting the .subdivision in the a.m. peak:hour 0 16 vehicles entering and 8 vehicles exiting the subdivision in the p.m...peak hour A trip distribution pattern was developed for. the generated traffic to and from the site. This pattern is based.,on existing traffic counts as well as taking into account site access -and access to the regional transportation system. The trip distribution pattern is: 0 35% to the West on 66th Street 0 25% from the -west on 66th Street 0 65% to the north on Barrie Road 0 35% from the north on Barrie Road 0 40% from the east on 66th Street The traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the area roadways per this distribution pattern. Since the 66 West Apartments will be taking over the site of the existing TCF.Bank, the existing traffic to and from the bank was deleted from the network for the future Build scenarios. oe Non -site Traffic Forecasting Since the site is expected to be built and fully occupied in 2015, a background growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes to represent future traffic. The MnDOT State Aid office has a 20 year growth rate projection for Hennepin County of 10 %. This means that 20 years from now, MnDOT projects traffic in the area will be 10% higher than current volumes. This leads to an annual growth rate of 0.5 %. This growth rate of 0.5% was applied to existing traffic on the network. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2015 Build Scenarios by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development to the existing traffic with the 0.5% growth rate applied and subtracting out the existing TCF Bank traffic. The resultant 2015 Build peak hour forecasts are shown in the Appendix under the capacity analysis section for each scenario. Traffic impact Study 4 66 West Apartments 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis for 2034 Scenarios a. Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2015 Scenario study hours are shown in Table 2. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations at the study intersections with the deletion of the east leg of the Barrie Road /Existing Southern Site Access (named Barrie Road /Southern Driveway in Table 2) and the conversion of the northern site access to a full access intersection (named Barrie Road /66 West Site Access in Table 2). The lane configurations used can be seen in the capacity analysis section of the Appendix for the Build scenarios. The forecast turning movement volumes for the 2015 peak hour scenarios as shown in the Appendix were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done in accordance with the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual using VISTROTM software. The complete LOS calculations, which include queue lengths and grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. Table 2 — 2015 Build Level of Service (LOS)' 66th St/Barrie Rd A c A b Barrie Rd /Southern Driveway A b A b Barrie Rd /66 West Site Access A (a) A (a) 'The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. The second letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. Comparing the results from Table 2 to Table 1, the LOS results are forecast to not get any worse with the conversion of the existing bank site to the 66 West Apartments. The northern driveway intersection actually improves with the conversion to the 66 West Apartments because the existing bank is generating more traffic than the apartment is forecast to. No additional improvements or modifications are needed to accommodate traffic from the 66 West Apartments. 6. Parking Analysis a. Existing Parking Counts The 66 West Apartment building is proposing a 19 stall parking lot for its 39 unit building. Typically this would be considered not enough parking for a building of its size, but the 66 West Apartments is housing for young adults who have experienced homelessness. Because of this, the parking demand is likely to be lower than most apartment buildings since vehicle ownership rates are expected to be lower at 66 West than a typical suburban apartment building. Traffic Impact Study 5 /1� F- 66 West Apartments In order to determine how much parking can be expected at the 66 West Apartments, parking lot counts were conducted at three similar sites in Minneapolis that are also managed by Beacon. The three sites were: ® Nicollet Square: 3700 Nicollet Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN ® Lydia Apartments: 1920 LaSalle Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN ® Cedar View: 3146 Cedar Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN The number of vehicles in each of these parking lots was counted after 10:00 p.m. every day for a week in June of 2014. The highest number of parked vehicles at each lot can be seen in Table 3. Full parking counts can be seen in Figure 4 in the Appendix. Table 3 — Existing Parking Lot Counts b. Projected 66 West Apartments Parking Looking at Table 3, it can be seen that the maximum parking space to apartment unit demand is 0.3. For the 39 units at the 66 West Apartments, that leads to 12 parking spaces needed. Since the proposed parking lot includes 19 parking spaces, there will be adequate parking on site. 7. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic and parking impacts of the proposed apartment building on the study intersections were analyzed in the 2015 build -out conditions. The principal findings are: i. The forecast traffic from the proposed development will have little impact on the operations of the study intersections. ii. All study intersections will operate acceptably through the 2015 build -out scenarios. iii. The proposed 19 unit parking lot is forecast to be adequate for the 66 West Apartment building. Other than the proposed changes of closing the east leg of the existing site southern driveway and converting the northern driveway to a full access intersection, no modifications are needed to be made by the developer to the study intersections. Traffic Impact Study 6 �� 66 West Apartments 8. Appendix. A. Figures 9 -4 B. Traffic Counts C. Capacity Analysis Backup AM Existing PM Existing C AM 2015 Build - - O PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study 7 66 West Apartments Appendix A - Figures Eck DY COMPANY Rgure I Location MaDs UJI North No Scale Study Area ite Location I Traffic Impact Study y Al 66 West Apartments r P 6'U',th\-,7 WWI ci Y 41 -k- F Rgure I Location MaDs UJI North No Scale Study Area ite Location I Traffic Impact Study y Al 66 West Apartments Appendix A - Figures ck Figure 2 Concept Plan wry ='�' XC4Y -ter ti dzE7"i��t '�} C, _ �. -e = �- �1_� q k', '1 .-. 1`' 7 ,G `S�. l��•-rE lr., ry tkp It � ` i. >n z t� 1p_p�_ 1 0 >" `tc�r>,� � �"a i.�! u`-4' Il � i ► It�i i �-+. '•. t .+'[3=a [±yyry +sr •f, $- i j S �, t���°qC�. e - _ ! iR kkJ %�' -�, e•` +_ a�j� ;r it ..S ,u�' ` , ^,R I �,•/ FI-F J �! iCt F'Y£Y h°.1,3.or_ F' c tif, �- Na� , L?f o s PA� la����1 rG. � `Y 9.a' e l .' � S � 1✓��_� �J r� r•. ��, P..gti x,. � �""•�' �s"_iE] '��+iS t i Zi .__ L'ts�J`.�- -�_a, �� '�,., �;'"'rF�a- 4,-�s�••-`�4l717 `" 1.5.%r.'�f �Fe'••a �«At���".' -y ®' .°+4 +IS �, I ' 4 � �€, •' V— „_ �. � r• ,3��� .sue c j 1 H �i r+ � +FYj�R`�� ` .tt!(dt q+�, it�z�.i` Si{ 4,�St� ` '�5• 6�S�.5�.� C 'I{ 3 �f�er,,,,,.�� t t � �j��r�. �rd�, � � y. I T�snsd5l�'ion�r ` Eji• *�?�'�� t�;S s -7.r .�Id l 2 .r r Z _�. .. r +�;� dLi' ' � �a� •u r_. :. 4+"+1' � It �30�_.`.1S. I. .'t -V _--:a' .:.:1. _._.. — --!`sl 66 WestApartrnents YIIt76Gt7 E7't l.i t•n! CI :S.ibt. I tM0t5 ;.�.•...•'•.•,.. ....,•_ '.+T'iE [DCFTION Traffic Impact Study A2 66 West Apartments Appendix A m f=igures S. ack Existing Lanes & Traffic dointrol PLi---�,-,TR:A'FFlC STUDY COMPANY - Traffic Impact Study A3 0 66 West Apartments Appendix A - Figures S k Figure 4 Ri�_ _::� Existin Parkin Data Tt AFfIC STUDY COMPANY g g Occuoied Vehicles (counted after 10pm) Date 7 Beacon Counts Spack Consulting Counts Lydia Apartments Nicollet Square Cedar View Lydia Apartments Nicollet Square Cedar View Monday 6/9/2014 7 7 3 7 5 3 Tuesday 6/10/2014 6 7 3 -- -- -- Wednesday 6/11/2014 5 6 3 -- -- -- Thursday 6/12/2014 6 7 3 5* 9* 3* Friday 6/13/2014 5 7 3 - -- - Saturday 6/14/2014 5 10 2 -- -- -- Sunday 6/15/2014 5 1 2 3 -- -- -- Maximum 7 10 3 *At 11 am Number of Units 40 42 10 Max Parking Demand 0.18 0.24 0.30 Traffic Impact Study A4 66 West Apartments A4► Traffic Data Inc Appendix B - Traffic Counts 1 �1Q ItArUCFAUIIIG PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1 - Barrie Rd & 66th St, 6- 10 714, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Start Date : 6110/2014 Edina, MN Page No : 1 09:00 AM 0 0- 0 19 2 21 0 0 164 09:15 AM I 0 0 0 26 2 28 0 0 148 Total 0 0 0 45 4 49 0 0 312 03:30 PM 0 0 0 26 4 30 0 0 166 03:45 PM I 0 0 0 25 3 28 I 0 0 211 Total 0 0 0 51 7 58 0 0 377 04:00 PM 0 1 0 28 2 31 0 0 172 04:15 PM 0- 0 0 22 3 25 0 0 193 04:30 PM 0 0 0 24 4 2B - 0 0- 171 04:45 PM 0- 0 - 0 20 0 20 0 0 231 Total 0 1 0 94 9 104 0 0 767 05:00 PM 0 1 0 28 1 30 0 0 225 05:15 PM 0 1 0 22 3 26 0 0 188 05:30 PM 0 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 196 05:45 PM 0 0 0 18 4 22 0 0 204 Total 0 .2 0 85 9 96 1 0 0 813 06:00 PM 0 1 0 10 5 16 0 0 176 06:15 PM 0 1 0 8 3 12 0 0 166 Grand Total 0 - 11 - 0 389 60 460 1 0 4779 Apprch % 0 2.4 0 84.6 13 0 0 90.3 Total % 0 0.1 0 4 0.6 4.7 0 0 49.1 Cars + 0 11 - 0 383 46 440 1 0 4651 Cars+ 0 100 0 -98.5 76.7 95.7 100 0 97.3 Trucks 0 0 0 1 6 14 20 0 0 128 Trucks 0 0 0 1.5 23.3 4.3 0 0 2.7 0 a 119 320 16 0 164 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 11 191 0 0 102 I 294 .32 0 344 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 .197 0 0 221 - 614 221 443 22 0 233 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- "0 19 248 0 0 267 I 528 39 1 - 417 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35 459 0 0 496 971 18 3 193' 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 238 0 0 250 474 26 0 219 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 16 236 0 3 255 499 11 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 242 0 1 257 467 27 0 258 0 0 0 0 1. 1 0 9 226 0- 0 235 514 82 3 852 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 49 942 0 4 997 1954 19 1 245 0 0 0 0 1 - 1 1 1. 9 244 0 1 255 531 33 1 222 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 15 226 0 0 241 489 15 0 '211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 230 0 1 238 467 25 1 '230 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 228 0 0 238 490 92 3 908 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 40 928 0 2 972 1 1977 13 1 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 205 0 0 210 416 13 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 185 0 0 193 384 501 13 5294 0 0 0 0 3 3 10 251 3717 0 8 3986 9743 9.5 0.2 0 0 0 0 100 0.3 6.3 93.3 0 0.2 5.1 0.1 54.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 2.6 38.2 0 0.1 40.9 492 13 5157 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 247 3710 0 6 3973 9570 98.2 100 97.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 98.4 99.8 0 75 99.7 98.2 9 0 137 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 4 7 0 2 13 173 1.8 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 1.6 0.2 0 25 0.3 1.8 Traffic Impact Study B1 66 West Apartments A( a Barrie Rd 66th St Barrie Rd 66th St Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time UTm Left Thru Right Peds' App.TOwi UTrn Left Thru Ri ht Peds App.Towl UTm Left Thru Ri ht Peds App.Tawl UTrn Left Thru Right Peds App.Tolal Int. Total 06:30 AM 0 0 . 0 2 1 3 0 0 96 13 1 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 4 36 0 0 40 153 06:45 AM 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 132 - 22 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 56 0 0 61 222 Total 0 0 0 9 1 10 0 0 228 35 1 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 92 0 0 101 375 07:00 AM 0 2 0 5 2 9 0 0 138 11 1 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 60 0 0 70 229 07:15 AM 0 0 0 5 4 9 0 0 239 19 0 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 82 0 0 94 361 07:30 AM 0 0 0 9 4' 13 1 0 288 28 0 317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 - 88 0 0 95 425 07:45 AM 0 0 0 15 fi 21 0 0 293 35 0 328 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 15 82 0 0 98 448 Total 1 0 2 0 34 16 52 1 1 0 958 93 1 1053 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 44 312 0 0 357 1463 0 0 AM 0 2 0 9 - 1 12 0 0 282 23 0 305 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 12 89 0 1 102 419 08:15 AM 0 1 _ 0 9 0 10 0 0 246 27 2 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 100 0 0 109 394 08:30 AM 0 0 0 18 2 20 0 0 234 26 1 261 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 110 0 0 118 399 08:45 AM 0 1 0 17 3 21 0 0 220 26 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 98 0 1 110 377 Total 1 0 4 0 53 6 63 1 0 0 982 102 3 1087 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 38 397 0 2 439 1 1589 09:00 AM 0 0- 0 19 2 21 0 0 164 09:15 AM I 0 0 0 26 2 28 0 0 148 Total 0 0 0 45 4 49 0 0 312 03:30 PM 0 0 0 26 4 30 0 0 166 03:45 PM I 0 0 0 25 3 28 I 0 0 211 Total 0 0 0 51 7 58 0 0 377 04:00 PM 0 1 0 28 2 31 0 0 172 04:15 PM 0- 0 0 22 3 25 0 0 193 04:30 PM 0 0 0 24 4 2B - 0 0- 171 04:45 PM 0- 0 - 0 20 0 20 0 0 231 Total 0 1 0 94 9 104 0 0 767 05:00 PM 0 1 0 28 1 30 0 0 225 05:15 PM 0 1 0 22 3 26 0 0 188 05:30 PM 0 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 196 05:45 PM 0 0 0 18 4 22 0 0 204 Total 0 .2 0 85 9 96 1 0 0 813 06:00 PM 0 1 0 10 5 16 0 0 176 06:15 PM 0 1 0 8 3 12 0 0 166 Grand Total 0 - 11 - 0 389 60 460 1 0 4779 Apprch % 0 2.4 0 84.6 13 0 0 90.3 Total % 0 0.1 0 4 0.6 4.7 0 0 49.1 Cars + 0 11 - 0 383 46 440 1 0 4651 Cars+ 0 100 0 -98.5 76.7 95.7 100 0 97.3 Trucks 0 0 0 1 6 14 20 0 0 128 Trucks 0 0 0 1.5 23.3 4.3 0 0 2.7 0 a 119 320 16 0 164 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 11 191 0 0 102 I 294 .32 0 344 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 .197 0 0 221 - 614 221 443 22 0 233 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- "0 19 248 0 0 267 I 528 39 1 - 417 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35 459 0 0 496 971 18 3 193' 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 238 0 0 250 474 26 0 219 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 16 236 0 3 255 499 11 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 242 0 1 257 467 27 0 258 0 0 0 0 1. 1 0 9 226 0- 0 235 514 82 3 852 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 49 942 0 4 997 1954 19 1 245 0 0 0 0 1 - 1 1 1. 9 244 0 1 255 531 33 1 222 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 15 226 0 0 241 489 15 0 '211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 230 0 1 238 467 25 1 '230 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 228 0 0 238 490 92 3 908 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 40 928 0 2 972 1 1977 13 1 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 205 0 0 210 416 13 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 185 0 0 193 384 501 13 5294 0 0 0 0 3 3 10 251 3717 0 8 3986 9743 9.5 0.2 0 0 0 0 100 0.3 6.3 93.3 0 0.2 5.1 0.1 54.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 2.6 38.2 0 0.1 40.9 492 13 5157 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 247 3710 0 6 3973 9570 98.2 100 97.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 98.4 99.8 0 75 99.7 98.2 9 0 137 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 4 7 0 2 13 173 1.8 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 1.6 0.2 0 25 0.3 1.8 Traffic Impact Study B1 66 West Apartments A( a ©❑o�o .Traffic Data Inc Appendix B'- Traffic Counts CJg it�Fi rlAil H(, PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1 - Barrie Rd & 66th St, 6- 10 -14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Start Date : 6/10/2014 Edina, MN Page No : 2 Traffic Impact Study Barrie Rd o O I \c S�OO 739 - '440 1179 p / 3 20 33 p o V O p O� 0 363 01.111 01 46 36 0 V Right Thru Left UTrn Peds may?° North 2 y`r 2 6/1020140 330AM m n n —► 6/10/2014 06:15 PM �s N – cer9 Trucks C a 1 I F� RTaht Peds 1 s 0 0 0 0 0 O o0 0 0 0 0 3 3 ae/ O Q � 3 � 3 Out In Total B2 �G3 66 West Apartments on ���1��0� ®�� ��� Appendix B - Traffic Counts w IAf, PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park; MN 55416 File Name : 1 - Barrie Rd & 66th St, 6- 10 7-14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Start Date : 6/10/2014 Edina, MN Page No : 3 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:45 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM Barrie Rd 0 0 22 3 66th St 0 0 193 26 Barrie Rd 219 0 0 0 66th St 0`- 0, 0. -� 16 Southbound 0 3 255 499 Westbound 0 0 0 24 Northbound 28 0 0 171 Eastbound 0 182 0 Start Time I UTrn I Left I Thrul Right I Peds I App. Total UTrn I Left I Thru Right I Peds I APP. T1111 UTrn Left Thru I Right I Peds App.Tolal UTrn Left Thru I Right Peds App. Tolal Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 AM to 12:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 231 27 0 258 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 226 0 0 235 - Peak Hour. for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 1 0 28 1 30 0 0 225 19 1 245 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 07:30 AM 0 0 0 9 4 13 1 0 288 28 0 317 0 0 0 0 1 .0 0. 0 7 88 0 0 95 425 07:45 AM 0 0 0 15 6 21 0 0 293 35 0 328 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 15 B2 0 0 98 448 08:00 AM 0 2 0 9 1 12 0 0 282 23 0 305 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 89 0 1 102' 419 08:15 AM 0 1 0 9 0 10 0 0 246 27 2 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 100 0 0 109 394 Total Volume 0 3 0 42 11 56 1 0 1109 113 2 1225 - 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 43 359 0 1 404 1686 %ADP. Total 0 5.4 0 75 19.6 0.1 0 90.5 9.2 0.2- 0 0 0 0 100 0.2 10.6 88.9 0 0.2 PHF 1 .000 .375 .000 .700 .458 .667 .250 .000 .946 .807 .250 .934 .000 .000 .000 .000- .250 .250 .250 .717 .898 .000 .250 .927 .941 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:45 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 0 0 22 3 25 0 0 193 26 0 219 0 0 0 0 0`- 0, 0. -� 16 236 0 3 255 499 04:30 PM 0 0 0 24 4 28 0 0 171 11 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 242 0 1 257 467 04`.45 PM 0 0 0 20 0_ 20 0 0 231 27 0 258 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 226 0 0 235 514 05:00 PM 0 1 0 28 1 30 0 0 225 19 1 245 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 244 0 1 255 531 Total Volume 0 1 0 94 8 103 0 0 820 83 1 904 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 47 948 0 5 1002 2011 % Apo. Total . 0 1 0 91.3 7.8 0 0 90.7 9.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 100 0.2 4.7 94.6 0 0.5 - PHF .000 .250 .000 .839 .500 .858 .000 .000 .887 .769 .250 .876 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .500 .734 :971 .000 .417 .975 .947 Traffic Impact Study B3 66 West Apartments rao❑ rt�r'li o�tEgo rtAff f PAM Ego Barrie Rd & Southern Site Access Edina, MN 1 Traffic Data Inc Appendix B - Traffic Counts PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 2 Barrie Rd & Southern Driveways, 6- 10 -14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 2 Start Date : 6/10/2014 Page No : 1 08:00 AM 0 2 Barrie Rd Southbound 1 0 12'.- 0 Driveway Westbound 0 0 0 Barrie Rd Northbound 0 12 22 1 Driveway Eastbound 35 0 0 StartTlme UT. Left Thru Right Peds App.T.W UTrn Left Thru Right Peds App. TOM] UTrn Left Thru Right Peds App.-row UTrn Left Thru I Right I Peds App.T.W Int. Total 06:30 AM 0 - 0 2 0 D -20 1 0' : -0 - 0 -1 1 0 6 10 1 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06:45 AM - 0 1 _ _ 7 0 0 8' 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18 1 0 27 0 1 0 0 0 1 36 Total 0 1 9 0 0 10 18 0 D 0 0 1 1 0 14 28 2 0 44 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 55 07:00 AM 0 0 7 0 T 68' 0. 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 11 i 0 21 0 0 0 0" 0 0- '30 07:15"AM 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 D D 0 0 10 19 2 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 37. 07:30 AM 0 0 9 0 01. 9 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 8. 25 2 0 35 0 0 0. 0 1 1 47 07:45 AM D 0 13 . 0 ' 1 L 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 33 3 0, 50 0 1 0 2 1 4 68 Total 0 0 34 1 2 37 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 41 88 8 0 137 0 1 0 2 2 5 182 08:00 AM 0 2 9 1 0 12'.- 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 1 0 35 0 0 0 2 0 2 49 08:15 AM 0 2 9 0 2 13 0 11 0 - 1 0 1. 0 12 22 2 1 37 D 0 0 1 0 1 52 08:30 AM 0 2 17 2 ,1 22 0 00 0 1 1 2 0 9 23 0 0 32 0 2 0 1 0 3 59 08:45 AM 0 0 18 3 '�0• 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 13 21 3 0 37 0 3 0 0 D 3 61 - Total 0 6 53 6 3;' 68' 0 0 0 2 1 3 1 0 46 88 6 1 - 141 1 0 5 0 4 0 9 1 221.,. 0430 PM 0 4 14 0 0 18 0 2 1 3 2 8 0 4 16 4 1 I 0 5 0 8 2 15 66 09:705 AM I 0 5 22 1 0 28I 0 3. 0 1 2 6I 0 4 19 4 0 27 0 4 0 .1 0, 5I 66 Total 1 0 6 37 2 0 45 0 5 0 1 3 9 0 11 33 11' 0 55 0 5 0 3 0 8 117 Traffic Impact Study B4 bb vvest Apartments AGE I - I 3 14 I 0345 PM I 0 4 19 1 0 24 I 0 3 0 2 2 7 0 8 27 6 1 42 0 1 0 3 0 77 Total 0 "L9 34 2 0 45 0 5 0 2 2 9 1 0 10 51 13 2 76 0 5 0 12 0 17 147 04:00 PM 0 3 21 0 0 24 0 2 0 6 1! 9 0 4 17 8 0 29 0 5 0 6 0 11 73 04:15 PM 0 5 13 2 0 20 0 5 0 1 0 6 0 4 29 9 0 42 0 1 2 4 0 7 75 0430 PM 0 4 14 0 0 18 0 2 1 3 2 8 0 4 16 4 1 25 0 5 0 8 2 15 66 04:45 PM 0 5. 15 0 0 20 0 2 0 4 0 6 0- 5 26 5 0 36 0 2 0 3 1 6 68 Total 0 17 63 2 0 82 0 11 1 14 3 29 1 0 17 88 26 1 132 0 13 2 - -21 3 39 1 282 05:00 PM 0. 7 22 1 0 30 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 2 22 4 1 29 0 7 1 5 1 14 78 05:15 PM 0 4 17 0 0 21 0 4 0 5 3 12 ., 0 12 30 6. 1 49 0 4 0 2 1 7 89 14 05:30 PM 0 0 1. 0 15 0 1 0 1 5 7 0 4 15 3 0 22 0 0 0 2 2 4 46 05:45 PM' 0 2 15 0 0 17' 0 2 0 1 2 5 0 1 28 5 1 35 0 0 0 1 2 3 60 Total 0 - 13 68 2 0 83 0 9 0 10 10 29 0 19 95 18 3 135 1 0 11 1 10 6 28 275 06:00 PM 0 2 7 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 4 5 0 1 15 2 0 18 0 0 0 3 0 3 35 06:15 PM 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 3 4 0 0 18 3 0 21 0 0 0 0 2 2 36 Grand Total 0 54 314 15 5 388 0 31 1 30 30 92 0 159 504 89 7 759 0 41 3 55 13 112 1351 Apprch % 0 13.9 80.9 3.9 - 1.3 0 33.7 1.1 32.6 32.6 0 20.9 66.4 11.7 0.9 0 36.6 2.7 49.1 - 11.6 Total % - 0 4' 23.2 1.1 0.4- 28.7 0 2.3 0.1 2.2 2.2 6.8 0 11.8 37.3 6.6 0.5 56.2 0 3 0.2 4.1 1 8.3 Cars + 0 54 314 14 4 386 0 - 31 1 30 27 89 0 158 504 89 6 757 . 0 39 3 54 13 . 109' 1341 Cars + 0 100 100 93.3 80 99.5 0 100 - 100 100 90 96.7 0 99.4 100 100 85.7 -1 99.7 -. 0 95.1 100 98.2 100 97.3 99.3 Trucks 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 3 10 Trucks 0 0 0 6.7 20. 0.5 0 0 0 . 0 10 3.3 0 0.6 0 0 14.3 0.3 0 4.9 0 1.8 0 2.7 0.7 Traffic Impact Study B4 bb vvest Apartments AGE ! III Barrie Rd & Southern Site Access Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study Traffic Data Inc Appendix B - Traffic Counts PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 . File Name : 2 - Barrie Rd & Southern Driveways, 6- 10 -14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 2 Start Date : 6/10/2014 Page No :2 \o 0 0 \ I Q Barrie 21 qo`a \ \ \ \VIIII Out I Tota 386 573 3 959 0 14 - 314 54 0 4 1 0 0 0 p r 5 3 0 O, Right Thru Left UTr Pe& w� Nom oO J o 6/102014 063 0 AM _ ' 6/102014 06:15 PM o` Cam + c C i Trucks v UTrn Left Thm Riaht o� o T r e � 0 158 504 89 6 0 l�m` O 0 1 0 0 1 r' 1 01 1591 5041 Bel 71 o Tor 399 757 1156 � _ dr 1 2 3 O 59 9 Out In Tatal 135 66 West Apartments a u. O ❑ U1 p UAW( IATI Ill. Barrie Rd & Southern Site Access Edina, MN Traffic Data Mc Appendix B - Traffic Counts PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 2 - Barrie Rd & Southern Driveways, 6- 10 7-14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 2 Start Date : 6/10/2014 Page No : 3 _ Peak Hour Analysis From 12:45 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 D4:30 PM 0 Barrie Rd y14 0 0 18 Driveway 2 1 3 2 Barrie Rd 0 4 16 4 Driveway 25 0 5 0 8 Southbound 15 66 04:45 PM 0 Westbound 15 0 0 20 Northbound 2 0 4 0 Eastbound - 0 5 26 Start Time I UTm I Left I Thru I Right I Peds App.Taal UTm 'Left Thru Right Peds App.Tcw UTrn I Left I Thru L Right I Peds I App.Tow UTrn Left Thru Right Peds App.TOiai int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 AM to 12:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 5 0 2 22 4 1 29 0 7 1 5 1 14 78 . 0 4 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:30 AM 21 0 4 0 5 3 12 0 12 30 -- 6 1 49 0 4 0 2 1 08:30 AM 0 2 17 2 1 22- 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 9 23 0 0 32 0 2 0 1 0 3 59 D8:45 AM 0 -0 18 3 0 21 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 13 21 3 0 37 0 3 0 0 0 3 61 09:00 AM 0 1 15 1 0 17 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 7 14 7 0 28 0 1 0 2 0 3 51 09:15 AM 0 5 22 1 0 28 0 3 0 1 2 6 0 4 19 4 0 27 0 4 0 1 0 - 5 66 Total Volume 0 8 72 7 1 88 0 5 0 2 4 11 0 33 77 14 0 124 0 10 0 4- 0 14 237 App. Total 0 9.1 81.8 8 1.1 0 45.5 0 18.2 36.4 0 26.6 62.1 11.3 0 0 71.4 0 28.6 0 PHF .000 .400 .818 .583 .250 .786 .000 .417 .000 .500 .500 .458 .000 .635 .837 .500 .000 .836 .000 .625 .000 .500 .000 .700 .898 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:45 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 D4:30 PM 0 4 y14 0 0 18 0 2 1 3 2 8 0 4 16 4 1 25 0 5 0 8 2 15 66 04:45 PM 0 5 15 0 0 20 0 2 0 4 0 6 - 0 5 26 5 0 36 0 2 0 -3 1 6 68 05:00 PM 0 7 22 1 0 30 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 2 22 4 1 29 0 7 1 5 1 14 78 05:15 PM 0 4 17 0 0 21 0 4 0 5 3 12 0 12 30 -- 6 1 49 0 4 0 2 1 7 89 Total Volume 0 20 68 1 0 89 0 10 1 15 5 31 0 23 94 19 3 139 0 18 1 18 5 42 301 App. Total 0 22.5 76.4 1.1 0 0 32.3 3.2 48.4 16.1 0 16.5 67.6 13.7 2.2 0 42.9 2.4 42.9 11.9 - PHF .000 .714 .773 .250 .000 .742 .000 .625 .250 .750 .417 .646 .000 .479 .783 .792 .750 .709 .000 .643 .250 .563 .625 .700 .846 Traffic Impact Study B6 I I �� 66 West Apartments . OpUO� Q tetdF f PAII IBf Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Edina, MN Traffic Data Inc Appendix B - Traffic Counts PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 3 - Barrie Rd & Northern Driveway, 6- 10 -14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 3 Start Date :,6/10/2014 Page No : 1 09:75 AM I 0 0 24 0 0 24 I 0 4 0 4 0 a I 0 0 24 0 - 0 24 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 56 Total 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 6 0 5 0 11 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 Barrie Rd I Driveway Barrie Rd I I tl I Southbound I 0 0 22 0 Westbound 22 0 2 Northbound 5 0 7 0 Eastbound 30 0 0 - Start Time UTrn . Left Thru Right Peds App. T.W UTrn Left Th. Right Peds App. T.W UTrn Left Thru Right Peds App. Tdai . UTm Left Thru Ri ht Peds App. Talal Int. Total 06:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0' 0 0 12 06:45 AM 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0- 1 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 19 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Total 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 29 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0' 40 07:00 AM' 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 1 - 0 0 0 1 0 0- 11 0' 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 07:15 AM 0 o 5 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 07:30 AM 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 25 0 0- 25 D 0 0 0 0 0 35 07A5 AM D 0 12 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 0 34 0 0 0' 0 0 0 47 Total 1 0 0 31 0 0 31 0 4 0 2 0.. 6 0 0 69 0 0 89 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 126 08:00 AM 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 08:15 AM 0 0 10 0 0 10 D 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 08:30 AM 0 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 08A5AM 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 4" Total 0 0 62 0 0 62 1 0 3 0 7 0 10 1 0 0 95 0 0 95 1 0 0 0- 0 0 0 1 1r 09:75 AM I 0 0 24 0 0 24 I 0 4 0 4 0 a I 0 0 24 0 - 0 24 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 56 Total 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 6 0 5 0 11 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 Traffic Impact Study B7 66 West Apartments �G� I I I tl I 03 :45 PM I 0 0 22 0 0 22 0 2 0 5 0 7 0 0 30 0 0 .30 0 0 0 0 0 O 59 Total 0 0 41 0 0 41 0 4 0 6 0 10 0 0 58 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 04:00 PM 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 04:15 PM 0 0 i6 0 0 16 0 4 0 1 0 5 0 0 31 0 0 31 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 04:30 PM 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 5 0 2 0 7 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 04:45 PM 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 032 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Total 1 0 0 64 0 0 64 1 0 18 0 3 0 21 1 0 0 115 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 200 05:00 PM 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 6 0 3 0 9 0 0 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 05:15 PM 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 05:30 PM 0 0 14 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 05A5 PM 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 29 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Total I 0 0 72 0 0 72 1 0 11 0 7 0 18 1 0 0 116 0 0 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 206 06:00 PM 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 06:15 PM 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Grand Total 0 0 337 0 0 337 0 46 0 35 0 81 0 0 575 0 0 575 0 0 0 0 0 0 993 Apprch % 0 0 100 0 0 0 56.8 0 43.2 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 33.9 0 0 33.9 0 4.6 0 3.5 0 8.2 0 0 57.9 0 0 57.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 cam + 0 0 337 0 0 337 0 46 0 35 0 81 0 0 575 0 0 575 0 0 0 0 0 0 993 % Cars + 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Trucks 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Trucks 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 Traffic Impact Study B7 66 West Apartments �G� 0 t7O D Ego rrar► cmi W. Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Edina, MN Traffic Impact Study Traffic Data Mc Appendix B - Traffic Counts PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 3 - Barrie Rd & Northern Driveway, 6- 10 -14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm Site Code : 3 Start Date 6/10/2014 Page No 2 Barrie Rd o� Out In Total 610 337 947 0 0 0 0 6101 i 0 Oo p 0 337 0 0 0 Q. 0 0 0 0 p 3 0 Right Thru Left UTr Peds F. Ui? °� North ~2 6/10/2014 06:30 AM � ooaL Cars+ C o� �� Trucks rj � c � 000,� vo o a < UTrn Left T eds Oy, 0 0 575 0 0 X03♦ 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 (11 01 � p I Ao � 383 575 958 J iii 0 5 5 O Out In Total B8 ,�69 66 West Apartments Ego rtu"1r'i airs W. Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Edina', MN Barrie Rd Southbound Start Time I UTm I Left I Thru I Right I Pe Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 AM to 12:30 PM -Peak 1 Traffic Data Mc Appendix B - Traffic Counts PO Box 16296 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 3 - Barrie Rd & Northern Driveway, 6- 10 -14, 630- 930am, 330 -630pm .Site Code : 3 Start Date : 6/10/2014 Page No : 3 Driveway Barrie Rd Jestbound Northbound Eastbound 1m I Right I Peds I App.T.te I UTrn I Left I Thru I Right I Peds .I App.Total I UTm I Left I Thru I Right I Peds I App. Totai I Int. Total AM 0 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 _08:30 08:45 AM 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 09:00 AM 0 0 15 0- 0 15 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 09:15 AM 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 Total Volume 0 0 79' 0 0 79 0 8 0 8 0 16 0 0 89 0 0 89 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 %A . Total 0'' 0 100 0 0 0 50 0 50 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .823 .000 .000 .823 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .856 .000 .000 .856 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 ,.000 .821 Peak Hour Analysis From 12:45 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:30 PM 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 5 0 2 0 7 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04:45 PM 0 0 16 0 0 16' 0 4 0 0 0 4 0• 0 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 6 0 3 0 9 0 0 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:' 05:15 PM 0 0 19 0 0 19 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0• 39 0. 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 Total Volume 0 0 72 0 0 72 0 17 0 6 0 23 0 0 127 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 73.9 0 26.1 0 0 0 100 0' ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .750 .000 .000 .750 .000 .708 .000 .500 .000 .639 .000 .000 .814 .000 .000 .814- .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .854 Traffic Impact Study B9 A76 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with \ /Pminn 9 nn -nR Vistro File: C: \... \66 West.vistropdb Report File: C: \...\AM Existing.pdf 66 West Apartments Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 1: AM Existing 6/18/2014 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s /veh) LOS 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Two -way stop HCM2010 SBR 0.118 15.5 C 2 Barrie Rd &Southern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 EBT 0.000 11.0 B Access 3 Barrie Rd &`Northern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 WBL 0.011 9.6 A Access V /C, Delay, LOS: For two -way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value; for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C1 66 West Apartments Appendix C e Capacify Analysis Backup Generated with mU S p a C k Version 2.00 -06 I� Intersection Level Of Service Report #1: Barrie Rd & 66th St Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 15.5 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: C Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c):. 0.118 Intersection Setup Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 66th St 42 44 66th St 1109 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Eastbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Confguration 3.00 r► u 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Movement Left 0 0 Right Left 0 0 Thru Thru 0 0 Right ,Lane Width [ft] 12.00 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 0 100.00 125.00 42 44 100.00 1o0.00 113 Peak Hour Factor 100.00 Speed [mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 35.00 1.0000 1.0000 35.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 0 11 0.00 98 301 0.00 Total Analysis Volume [ veh/h] Crosswalk 46 yes 390 1205 no Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 11 no 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd 66th St 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 0 42 44 359 1109 113 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In- Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [ veh[h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 42 44 359 1109 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 0 11 12 98 301 31 Total Analysis Volume [ veh/h] 0 46 48 390 1205 123 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 11 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles /h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C2 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with O a c k Version 2.00 -06 Intersection Settings Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio Priority. Scheme Stop: Free Free 0A1.`. 0.00 Flared Lane 0.00 15.46 12.96 0.00 0.00 Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 B A Two -Stage Gap Acceptance no 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.40 0.32 Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.00 0A1.`. 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0.00 15.46 12.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.40 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th- Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 9.94 7.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 15.46 1.42 0.00 Approach LOS C A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 0.74 Intersection LOS C 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C3 �73 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with ' = SDack Version 2.00 -06 ' Intersection Level Of Service Report #2: Barrie Rd & Southern Site Access Control Type: Two -way stop Analysis Method: HCM2010 Analysis Period: 15 minutes Intersection Setup Delay (sec / veh): 11.0 Level Of Service: B Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.000 Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Driveway Barrie Rd 33 77 Driveway 8 1 72 Driveway 10 Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration 1.0000 + 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Ton Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Speed [mph] 0 30.00 0 0 30.00 0 0 30.00 0 0 30.00 0 Grade [ %] 0 0.00 1 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 Crosswalk 0 yes 0 0 yes 0 0 yes 0 0 yes 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Driveway Base Volume Input [ veh/h] 33 77 14 8 1 72 7 10 0 4 5 0 2 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Ton Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh /h] 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 33 77 14 8 72 7 10 0 4 5 0 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 1 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 9 21 4 2 20 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 36 84 15 9 78 8 11 0 4 5 0 2 Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 0 1 0 4 Bicycle Volume [bicycles /h] 0 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C4 66 West Apartments Appendix C Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with I IJ j,. ' o S jj'''''�' a C k Version 2.00 -06' WI Intersection Settirigs Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop 0.00 Flared Lane 0.02 0.00 no no 0.00 Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0' 0 7.45 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance: '0.00 10.50. no no 10.51 Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0 A Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 1 0.00 0.02 0.00 O.Od 0.01 0.00 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 7.45 0,00 .0.00 7.45 0.00 '0.00 10.50. 11.02 8.80 -. 10.51 10.94 8.83 Movement LOS A A A A A A B B A. B B A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.30 FO.30 0.30 0.21 021 0.21 0.06 OA6 0.06 d,03 0.03. 0.03 95th - Percentile -Queue Length [ft] 7.38 7.38 7.38 5.15 5.15 5.15. 1.58 1.58 1.58 0.73 0.73 0.73 d_A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 1.99 0.71 10:05 10.03 Approach LOS A A B B d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 2.21 Intersection LOS B 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C5 h75- 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with S jlO a C Version 2.00 -06 Intersection Level Of Service Report #3: Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Control Type: Two -way stop Analysis Method: HCM2010 Analysis Period: 15 minutes Intersection Setup Delay (sec / veh): 9.6 Level Of Service: A Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.011 Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] Barrie Rd 0 0 Driveway 8 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Northbound 1.0000 1.0000 Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Configuration 3.00 i 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate i 1.00 1.00 1.00 or 1.00 Turning Movement Thru 0 0 Right Left 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] Thru Left 0 0 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 100.00 100.00 0 79 100.00 100.00 Peak Hour Factor, 0.9200 100.00 Speed [mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 30.00 1.0000 1.0000 30.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 0.00 0 0 0.00 2 2 0.00 97 Crosswalk 0 yes 9 9 yes 0 0 yes Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] 89 0 0 79 8 8 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 89 0 0 79 8 8 Peak Hour Factor, 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 24 0 0 21 2 2 Total Analysis Volume [ veh/h] 97 0 0 86 9 9 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C6 76 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with S a C k I Version 2.00 -06 I` Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Flared Lane 0.01 0.01 no Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 8.85 Movement LOS no Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 8.85 Movement LOS A A A A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 95th- Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 1.58 d A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 0.00 0.00 9.21 Approach LOS A A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 0.82 Intersection LOS A 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C7 k77 66 West Apartments Appendix.0 v Capacity Analysis Backup , Generated with M.j U' o Sr)ack Version 2.00 -06 nnp ( nnfinuratinn;ani Traffic Cnntrnl DJ �I- c � 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic.impact Study c8 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with Il S a c k Version 2:00 -06 ^�� ^ y "C 44 113 359 a — 1109 10 J _ 2 —v r— 0 q � 5 66 West Apartments Scenario 1: 1: AM Existing Traffic Impact Study C9 J 1 W, g B 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with E; D' a C k Version 2.00 -06 '° Vistro File: C: \... \66 West.vistropdb Report File: C: \... \PM Existing.pdf 66 West Apartments Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 3: PM Existing 6/18/2014 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s /veh) LOS 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Two -way stop HCM2010 SBR 0.200 13.8 B 2 Barrie Rd & Southern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 EBT 0.002 11.4 B Access 3 Barrie Rd & Northern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 WBL 0.023 9.8 A Access V /C, Delay, LOS: For two -way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value; for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C10 66 West Apartments gd Generated with' M JE Version 2.00 -06 Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup Appendix C Capacity Analysis Backup Suck Intersection Level Of Service Report #1: Barrie Rd & 66th St . Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 13.8 HCM2010 Level Of Service: B 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.200 Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 66th St 94 49 66th St 820 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Eastbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Configuration 3.00 IF► II 3.00 3.00 �q 9 1.00 1.00 1.00 I i► 1.00 Turning Movement Left 0 0 Right Left 0 0 Thru Thru 0 0 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 0 100,00 _125.00 94 49 100.00 100.00 83 Peak Hour Factor 100:00 Speed (mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 35.00 1.0000 1.0000 35.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 0 26 0.00 258 223 0.00 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] Crosswalk 102 yes 1030 891 no Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 8 no 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd 66th St 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 0 94 49 948 820 83 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh[h] 0 94 49 948 820 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 26 .13 258 223 23 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 102 53 1030 891 90 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 8 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles /h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study �V 1 66 West Apartments Appendix C ® Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with :snack Version 2.00 -06 1 Intersection Settings Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio Priority Scheme Stop Free Free 0.01 0.00 Flared Lane 0.00 13.80 10.71 0.00 0.00 Storage Area [veh] 0 0 ` 0 . B A Two -Stage Gap Acceptance no 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.74 0.25 Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.20 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.00 ' <d_M, Delay for Movement'[s /veh] 0.00 13.80 10.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B B A A A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.74 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th - Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 18.45 6.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 13.80 0.52 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 0.91 Intersection LOS B 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C12 66 West Apartments : Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with Version 2.00 -06 E Intersectlon Level Of Service Report #2: Barrie Rd &Southern Site Access Control Type:. Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 11.4 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: B Analysis Period: 15`minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.002 Intersection Setup Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Driveway Barrie Rd 23 94 Driveway 20 68 Driveway 18 Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 . 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 70 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Speed [mph] 0 30.00 0 0 30.00 0 0 30.00 0 0 30.00 0 Grade [ %] 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 Crosswalk 0 yes 0 0 yes 0 0 yes 0 0 yes 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] 23 94 1 19 20 68 1 1 18 1 1 18 10 1 15 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site- Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [yeh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips;[veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 23 94 19 1 20 68 1 18 1 18 10 1 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 1 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 26 5 5 18 0 5 0 1 5 3 0 4 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 25 102 21 22 74 1 20 1 1 1 20 11 1 16 Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 3 0 5 5 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C13 66 West Apartments ��3 Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with mm a c k Version 2.00 -06 I ^� Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop Flared Lane 0.00 0.03 no no Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 0.00 7.53 no no Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 7.43 0,00 0.00 7.53 0.00 0.00 11.04 11.45 9.00 11.03 11.27 9.06 Movement LOS A A A A A A B B A B B A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 95th - Percentile Queue Length [ft] 8.17 1 8.17 8.17 5.39 5.39 5.39 4.31 4.31 4.31 2.86 2.86 2.86 d_A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 1.26 1.71 10.06 9.91 Approach LOS A A B A d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh) 3.32 Intersection LOS B 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C14 �G L'_ 66 West Apartments Appendix C m Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with SDack Version 2.00 -06� ••µ• Intersection Level Of Service Report #3: Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.8 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: A Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.023 Intersection Setup Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd . Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] Barrie Rd 0 0 Driveway 17 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Northbound 1.0000 1.0000 Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Configuration 3,00 ,- 1 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 S r II 1.00 Turning Movement Thru 0 0 Right Left 0 0 Thru Left 0 0 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 12.60 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 0 100.00 100.00 0 0 100.00 100.00 6 Peak Hour Factor 100.00 Speed [mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 30.00 1.0000 1.0000 30.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 35 0 0.00 20 5 0.00 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] Crosswalk 0 yes 78 18 yes Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 0 yes 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] 127 0 0 72 17 6 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles. Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3,00 ,- 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 127 0 0 72 17 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 OtherAdjustmentFactor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 35 0 0 20 5 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 138 0 0 78 18 7 Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles /h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C15 lk 1 66 West Apartments Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Flared Lane 0.02 0.01 no Storage'Area [veh] - 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 9.11 Movement LOS no Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 Movement; Approach, i£ Intersection Results VIC, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.82 9.11 Movement LOS A A A A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 95th - Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 .0.00 2.40 2.40 d A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 0.00 0.00 9.62 Approach LOS A A A Intersection Delay [s /veh] 1.00 Intersection LOS A 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C16 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control a *m, I .... ....... l 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study o � 'r v C17 1 66 West Apartments Appendix C Capacity..Analysis Backup Generated with.}lf' o a c Version 2.00 -06 �k ' Traffic Vnlume - Base Volume 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C18 ��� 66 West Apartments .� 49 J 18 15 6 948 + )8210 1 18 � 10 17 � NOi r� r 66 West Apartments Scenario 3: 3: PM Existing Traffic Impact Study C18 ��� 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with S a C k Version 2.00 -06 66 West Apartments Vistro File: C: \... \66 West.vistropdb Scenario 2: AM 2015 Build Report File: C: \...WM 2015 Build.pdf 6/18/2014 Intersection Analysis Summary - ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s /veh) LOS' 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Two -way stop HCM2010 SBR 0.098 15,3 C 2 Barrie Rd &Southern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 EBL 0.015 10.1 B Access 3 Barrie Rd &.Northern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 WBL 0.009 9.5 A Access V /C, Delay, LOS: For two -way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value; for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 66 West Apartments S Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C19 66 West Apartments Appendix C e Capacity.Analysis Backup , Generated with a L' k Version 2.00 -06 Intersection Level Of Service Report #1: Barrie Rd & 66th St Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 15.3 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: C Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.098 Intersection Setup Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 66th St 42 44 66th St 1109 Approach. Base Volume Adjustment Factor Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Eastbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Configuration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Movement Left 0 0 Right Left 0 0 Thru Thru 6 1 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 1 -5 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0, 0 100.00 125.00 35 40 100.00 100.00 107 Peak Hour Factor. 100.00 Speed [mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 35.00 1.0000 1.0000 35.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 0 10 0.00 99 304 0.00 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] Crosswalk 38 yes = 395 1217 no Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 11 no 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd 66th St 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 0 42 44 359 1109 113 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site- Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 6 1 0 0 2 Diverted Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 -13 -5 0 0 -9 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0, 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 0 35 40 363 1120 107 Peak Hour Factor. 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume-[veh /h] 0 10 11 99 304 29 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 0 38 43 395 1217 116 Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 11 0 0 Bicycle Volume (bicycles/h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C20 „ 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with pa c k Version 2.00 -06 h Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance no '- Movement LOS Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results WC, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0.00 15.27 12.91 0.00 0.00 O.DO '- Movement LOS C B A A A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.32 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th- Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 8.07 7.05 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 d A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 15.27 1.27 0.00 Approach LOS C A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 0.63 Intersection LOS C 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C21� I 66 West Apartments Inter5e6tion.1 -evel Of Service Report #2: Barrie'Rd &Southern Site Access Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): Intersection Setup 10.1 B 0.015 . Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Barrie Rd 33 77 Driveway 7 Approach 4 Northbound 1.0000 Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Eastbound 1.0000 Lane Configuration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 Turning Movement Left 1.01 1.01 Thru Thru 0 Right Left 0 0 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00, - 0 12.00 12.00 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 Other Volume [veh /h] -100.00 100.00 0 100.00 100.00 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 100.00 Speed [mph] 71 30.00 10 30.00 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 Grade [ %] 0.9200 0.00 Other Adjustment Factor 0.00 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 1.0000 Crosswalk Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] yes 22 yes 2 3 yes Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] 33 77 72 7 10 4 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 3 6 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 -8 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 33 81 71 7 10 4 , Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 9 . 22 19 2 3 1 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 36 88 77 8 11 4 Pedestrian Volume,[ped /h] , 0 1 0 Bicycle Volume,[bicycles /h] 0 s 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C22 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis. Backup Generated with s ll' © S lo a c k Version 2.00 -06 Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Flared Lane 0.02 0.00 no Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 8.78 Movement LOS no Number of Storage Spaces in Median r 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement, [s /veh] 7.45 0.00 0,00 0.00 10.06 8.78 Movement LOS A A A A B A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 95th - Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.72 6.72 0.00 0.00 1.47 1.47 d_A, Approach Delay [s /veh] 2.16 0.001. 9.72 Approach LOS A A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 1.85 Intersection LOS B 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C23 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity. Analysis Backup Generated) with S p" a C k Version 2.00 -06 OEM Intersection Level Of Service Report #3: Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.5 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: A Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (V /c): 0.009 Intersection Setuo Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] Barrie Rd 0 0 Driveway 8 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Northbound 1.0000 1.0000 Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Configuration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Movement Thru In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 Right Left 0 Thru Left Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 6 10 12.00 12.00 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 .. Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 -8 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100A0 0 0 100.00 100.00 0 100.00 100.00 88 3 100.00 Speed [mph] 6 30.00 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 0.00 1 Crosswalk 20 yes 3 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] yes 3 1 yes 7 Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh /h] 89 0 0 79 8 8 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 3 1 0 6 10 Diverted Trips [ veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 2 0 0 -8 -8 -8 Other Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 88 3 1 72 6 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 24 1 0 20 2 3 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 96 3 1 78 7 11 Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/hl 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C24 A 9 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with jj�' Version 2.00 -06 "" "���" Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Flared Lane 0.01 0.01 no Storage'Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 8:85 Movement LOS no Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 6 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0.00 6.00 7.42 0.00 9.53 8:85 Movement LOS A A A A A. A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.06 95th - Percentile; Queue Length.[ft] 0.00. 0:00 ` 4.20 4.20 1.54 1.54 d_A; Approach Delay [s /veh] 0.00 0.09 9.11 Approach LOS A A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] _ 0.87 IntersectioA'LOS A 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C25 Aq� 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with m S r) a �k Version 2.00 -06 Lane Confpuration and Traffic Control . (D 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study J� 0 >- C26 K 66 West Apartments Appendix C e Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with S jr) a c k Version 2.00 -06 '^�M Traffic Volume - Base Volume. � J � -4 1N 44 113 10 359 ti — 1109 4 Z S I Cl)r 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study 0 Y 8 8 Wo /W C27 Aql� 66 West Apartments Appendix C o Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with }U�o a c k Version 2.00 -06 n -4 ~ -7 0 �—► �— 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study �1 0 J 0 �T O [n � oo 2 2 1� N W C28 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with U' o Version 2.00 -06 �' '^ Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume 10 40 107 6 0 10 6 CD 66 West Apartments Scenario 2: 2: AM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C29 Aq 1 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with = S p U c k Version 2.00 -06 'mom Vistro File: C: \... \66 West.vistropdb Report File: C: \... \PM 2015 Build.pdf 66 West Apartments Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 4: PM 2015 Build 6/18/2014 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s /veh) LOS 1 Barrie Rd & 66th St Two -way stop HCM2010 SBR 0.151 13.3 B 2 Barrie Rd & Southern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 EBL 0.027 10.1 B Access 3 Barrie Rd & Northern Site Two -way stop HCM2010 WBL 0.004 9.6 A Access V /C, Delay, LOS: For two -way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value; for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C30 � (O 6 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis backup Generated with IWOM U' o Version 2.00 -06 Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup Intersection Level Of Service Report - #1: Barrie Rd & 66th St Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): HCM2010 Level Of Service: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c) 13.3 B 0.151 E-ads• Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 66th St 94 49 66th St 820 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Eastbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 3.00 Lane Configuration 3.00 r 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1:00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Movement Left 0 0 Right Left 0 I Thru Thru 3 4 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 Diverted Trips [ veh/h] 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 - 12.00. 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 1. -6 0 0 0 Other Volume [ veh/h] 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 0 100.00 125.00 71 47 100.00 100.00 77 Peak Hour Factor 100.00 Speed [mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 35.00 1.0000 1.0000 35.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 0 19 0.00 260 225 0.00 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] Crosswalk 77 yes 1040 900 no Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 8 no 0 Volumes Name Barrie Rd 66th St 66th St Base Volume Input [veh /h] 0 94 49 948 820 83 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1:00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 In- Process Volume [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [ veh/h] 0 3 4 0 0 6 Diverted Trips [ veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] 0 -27 -6 0 0 -13 Other Volume [ veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 0 71 47 957 828 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 19 13 260 225 21 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 0 77 51 1040 900 84 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 8 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C31 4r ® C r/ 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with Intersection Settings 0 Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance no Movement LOS Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.15 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0,00 13.32 10.71 0.00 0,00 0.00 Movement LOS B B A A A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th - Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 13.22 6.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [slveh] 13.32 0.50 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 0.73 Intersection LOS B 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C32 � 0 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Barrie Rd Generated with S p a C k Version 2.00 -06 "* Intersection Level Of Service Report 68 #2: Barrie Rd & Southern Site Access 18 Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 10.1 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: B Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.027 Intersection Setup 1.0000 Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [ veh/h] . Barrie Rd 94 68 Driveway 18 Approach Base Volume Adjustment Factor Northbound 1.0000 1.0000 Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Eastbound 3.00 Lane Configuration► 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Movement Left 0 0 Thru Thru 0 0 Right Left 10 3 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 Diverted Trips [v'eh /h] 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 12.00 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 -17 6 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0. Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 0 0 100.00 100A0 105 55 100.00 100.00 18 Peak Hour Factor 100.00 Speed [mph] 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 0.9200 30.00 1.0000 1.0000 30.00 1.0000 Grade [ %] 1.0000 0.00 6 29 0.00 0 5 0.00 Total Analysis Volume [ veh/h] Crosswalk 114 yes 1 20 yes Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3 yes 5 Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [ veh/h] . 23 94 68 1 18 18 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 In- Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site- Generated Trips [ veh/h] 0 10 3 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [v'eh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 -17 6 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Houdy Volume [veh /h] 23 105 55 1 18 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15- Minute Volume [veh /h] 6 29 15 0 5 5 Total Analysis Volume [ veh/h] 25 114 60 1 20 20 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3 0 5 Bicycle Volume [bicycles /h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C33 X103 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with om SDack Version 2.00 -06 " """ ", INF N Intersection Settings Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Flared Lane 0.03 0.02 no Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 8.87 Movement LOS no Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 d_M, Delay for Movement [ s/veh] 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.08 8.87 Movement LOS A A A A B A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 95th - Percentile Queue Length [ft] 7.52 7.52 0.00 0.00 3.72 3.72 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.33 0.00 9.47 Approach LOS A A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 2.35 Intersection LOS B 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C34 A(ot 66 West Apartments Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with . S �e a c k Version 2.00 -06 Intersection Level Of Service Report #3: Barrie Rd & Northern Site Access Control Type: Two -way stop Delay (sec / veh): 9.6 Analysis Method: HCM2010 Level Of Service: A Analysis Period: 15 minutes Volume to Capacity (v /c): 0.004 Intersection Setup Name Barrie Rd 'Barrie Rd Driveway Barrie Rd 127 0 Driveway 72 Approach 6 Northbound 1.0000 Southbound 1.0000 1.0000 Westbound 1.0000 Lane Configuration' 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 Turning Movement Thru 1.01 1.01 Right . Left 0 Thru . Left 0 0 Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 6 0 12.00 12.00 Diverted Trips [veh /h]_ 12.00 12.00. 0 0 12.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -15 0 0 Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 -6 Other Volume [veh/h] 100.00 100.00 0 100.00 100,00 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 100.00 Speed [mph] 6 30.00 3 30.00 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 30.00 0.9200 Grade [ %] 0.9200 0.00 Other Adjustment Factor 0.00 1.0000 1.0006 0.00 1.0000 Crosswalk Total -15-Minute Volume [veh /h] yes 3 yes 14 1 yes Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] Volumes Name Barrie Rd Barrie Rd Driveway Base Volume Input [veh/h] 127 0 0 72 17 6 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [ %] 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Growth Rate 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 In- Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site - Generated Trips [veh /h] 0 10 6 0 3 5 Diverted Trips [veh /h]_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh /h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh /h] -15 0 0 -20 -17 -6 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh /h] 113 10 6 53 3 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0006 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total -15-Minute Volume [veh /h] 31 3 2 14 1 1 Total Analysis Volume [veh /h] 123 11 7 58 3 5 Pedestrian Volume [ped /h] 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles /h] 0 0 0 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C35 66 West Apartments 41015' Intersection Settings 0 f i Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Flared Lane 0.00 0.01 no Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 Two -Stage Gap Acceptance 8.96 Movement LOS no Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V /C,. Movement VIC Ratio:., :0.00 0.00 0:00 6.00 ' 0.00 0.01 d_M, Delay for Movement [s /veh] 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 ' 9.64 '; 8.96 Movement LOS A A A A A. A 95th - Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.03 95th- Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 3.53 3.53 0.70 0.70 d_A, Approach Delay[s /veh] 0.00 0.81 9.21 Approach LOS A A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s /veh] 0.61 Intersection LOS A 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C36 'Q 66 West Apartments �Io�" Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with m !' o S p a e k Version 2.00 -06 Lane Configuration and.Traffic Control, O 0 c� 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C37 66 West Apartments 4(07 Appendix C ® Capacity Analysis. Backup Generated with ® Q Version.2.00 -06* 49 k— 83 948 = — 820 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C38 4'O � 66 West Apartments • Appendix C o Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with p' oo S p a C:k Version 2.00 -06 '� Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips N O A -2 ` -7 0 J ► — 0 0 +1� I O � 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study l V ! N p7 tttJJJ IlO ■ eII � -14 � o C39 4101 66 West Apartments Appendix Q. Capacity Analysis Backup Generated with S r) a e k Version 2.00 -06 _ '° M MP Trnffir. \ /nli imp - R iti Grp Tntnl \ /nlilmp D-�47 77 957 — 828 66 West Apartments Scenario 4: 4: PM 2015 Build Traffic Impact Study C40 5 3 1 r i C O c A(P. 66 West Apartments MINUTES OF THE RE ULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION h CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA '' CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 23, 2014 r" 7:00 PM V I. CALL TO ORDER s` II. ROLL CALL `A Answering the roll call were: Schroder, Olsen, Kilbero'H' alva, Lee, Carr, Forrest, Potts Members absent from roll: Staunton, Serer, Plat%eter 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner _Carr moved approval ofilthe Apr` 23, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye;¢riiotion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CPNSENT AGENDA: `l;. A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Plan�ing Commission March 12, 2014 Commissioner Carmoved approval of the April 9, 2014, meetrt minutes. Commissioner Olson seconded the m ion. Acting Chair Potts requested a change to the minutes regarding his participation rfxthe vote on the Xerxes/York project. All voted aye,timotion carried. Y V. G`OMMUNITY COMMENT % A'VStaunton asked if anyone would like to speak; being none, Commissir Carr moved to close munity comment. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. All votedNae; public comment VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review — 66th West Apartment for Beacon Interfaith Housing, 3360 West 66th Street Page 1 of 11 r I 16.1 Planner Presentation Planner Teague.reported that the Planning Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan. request to remodel and expand the existing TCF Bank building, located at 3330 66th Street. The applicant proposes to remodel and expand the building into 39:dnits of small studio apartments for young adults who have experienced homelessness. The size of the units would range from 355 -456 square feet. Each unit would contain a full kitchen and =_ bathroom. The building would contain offices for on- site service providers and property management. There would also be a community area for residents; a fitness area; a computer lab and a laundry room. Teague explained that the site is 39,204 square feet in size. The existing bank is 18,179 square feet. The:proposed addition would'be 11,888 square feet. The building would remain two stories. The remodel of the building would retain the existing brick, and the addition would be brick with metal panels. Teague noted there would be 25 surface parking stalls. No enclosed parking is proposed. The applicants have indicated in their narrative that. 16% of their residents would have cars. In similar Beacon projects in other cities, 7% of their residents have cars. Therefore, they believe they would have adequate parking. They would anticipate about 8 parking stalls needed for residents and 6 for staff. Residents are expected to utilize the Metro Transit bus service available across the street at Southdale Center. Teague stated a parking and traffic study would be completed with a formal development application. Continuing, Teague said all of the 39 units would be considered affordable housing, and would apply towards the City and Met Council's goal for affordable housing. The Comprehensive Plan defines the site and area as RM, Regional Medical. The RM allows for senior housing on a case by case basis, however, does not allow other housing. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be required. Teague said to accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. A Rezoning from POD- I, Planned Office District- I, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. 2. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to allow housing other than Senior Housing in the Regional Medical District. Teague pointed out this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. Page 1 of 11 The Comprehensive Plan was amended to. allow senior housing in the RM District adjacent to.the Fairview Southdale Hospital, as part of the 6500 France project. If the project is found to be acceptable, this definition could be expanded for "specialty housing" as deemed appropriate by the City Council, when specific goals of the Comprehensive Plan are achieved. Consideration for housing in the RM District and at higher densities includes: proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. Concluding, Teague stated ,a case could be made for allowing specialty housing in this q. location as it would 'reuse an existing building (sustainability); provide a 100% affordable housing development; be in close proximity to Metro Transit; be located on a high visibility arterial roadway; and be completely separated from low density residential. Traffic impacts, further consideration of sustainable design and public art would be considered with a formal application. Appearing for the Applicant Lee Blons, Beacon Interfaith Discussion Commissioner Carr asked Planner Teague where the concept of "specialty housing" derived from. Planner Teague responded it's a term he suggested to allow flexibility and "use" limits., Continuing, Carr also observed parking is at odds with the ordinance; however, she believes it can be resolved. Commissioner Forrest questioned if the zoning classification and comprehensive guide plan are at odds in this location. Planner Teague responded yes and no. He explained that the zoning classification for this property is POD -1; Planned Office District and it is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Regional Medical. Office use and senior housing is permitted in Regional Medical; however, housing is not permitted in the POD -I, Planned Office District. Acting Chair Potts commented that for the applicant to achieve this proposal the land use needs modification. Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if the Comprehensive Plan references affordable housing. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He explained the Met Council has established for Edina an "affordable housing" goal of adding 212 affordable housing units by 2020. Page 3 of 11 r Applicant Presentation Ms. Blons addressed the Commission and gave a brief description of their mission statement and their effort in securing affordable housing for homeless teens. Blons explained that they believe the 66`' Street location is excellent and they are using the concept model from their Nicollet Square development for this project. Blons reported that the site is .9 acres and will incorporate the entire existing 18,179 square foot building to include an 11,888 square foot addition to accommodate the 39 proposed housing units. Blons told the Commission non - profits tend to work backwards they secure the approvals first and then the funding. Continuing, Blons said their emphasis is on providing safe living accommodations so teens can focus on their education and employment. Blons pointed out the 66 West location is excellent; it's located near multiple employment opportunities and is directly across from mass transit. Concluding, Blons introduced Bart Nelson, Urban Works to speak on the architectural components of the project. Bart Nelson gave a power point presentation highlighting aspects of the project to include parking and proposed landscaping and screening features. Continued Discussion Commissioner Carr told the Commission she thinks the building renovations and new addition are well done. She further asked Mr. Nelson if bike racks are proposed for the site. Mr. Nelson responded in the affirmative. Continuing, Carr asked if materials for the proposed fence have been chosen. Mr. Nelson said the materials for the fence haven't been finalized; however, he believes they may go with a cedar fence. Commissioner Forrest stated she has a concern with regard to the proposed fence on the buildings south side. Forrest explained that a redevelopment goal of the Planning Commission (where appropriate) is to provide a pedestrian experience by engaging the building and street. She observed if a tall fence is placed in this area the site would be "cut off' from the streetscape. Acting Chair Potts said in his opinion this redevelopment proposal is intriguing not only for its proposed land use but for reuse of the building instead of teardown rebuild. Potts added if the project proceeds as proposed he would suggest that the applicant consider other sustainable strategies with regard to the building. Concluding, Potts further suggested that the applicant work with City staff on finding the "right" parking number and if appropriate develop a proof of parking agreement to ensure adequate greenspace. Commissioner Schroeder commented that he agrees a proof of parking agreement would work well for this site, adding he believes if a proof of parking agreement were drafted and the need arose for more parking the site could yield more parking spaces. Schroeder further stated in his opinion the two access points on Barrie Road are not needed; one is Page 4 of 11 AA adequate. Continuing, Schroeder agreed with the comments from Commissioner Forrest on engaging the street. He said the Commission has been working hard on the relationship between building to street and in this situation he believes more work could be done to accomplish that interaction.. He further suggested that simple changes be made to the facade along West 66th Street to make it more inviting. Schroeder said he appreciates the desire for a fence, but suggested: redesign of the front outdoor area to ensure street engagement while affording a buffer area. This would achieve the Commission's work�on living streets. Concluding Schroeder said he likes this proposal but stated he's not sure if this request brings the site to its highest potential. He noted no one knows how far the RMD zoning district may expand and if this site is eliminated from that potential some things are lost and some gained; whichever way'the redevelopment precedes that point should be kept in mind. Commissioner Lee asked Mr. Nelson if there are windows proposed for the basement level. Mr. Nelson responded in the affirmative. He pointed out each studio apartment would have a window and there would be a window in the common area for a total of four. Continuing, Commissioner Lee said she agrees with past comments that the south elevation needs more attention; either through landscaping or architectural features. Concluding, Lee asked how many outdoor gathering areas are proposed. Nelson responded "outdoor gathering" areas are proposed on the north and south side of the building. Nelson indicated the development team would re- review landscaping and screening to soften the site and engage the streetscape on the south elevation. Commissioner Kilberg asked if Beacon contacted neighboring property owners. Ms. Larson responded Beacon has outreached to neighboring business owners and those conversations will continue as the project proceeds. She also noted Fairview Southdale Hospital is supportive. Acting Chair Potts asked Ms. Blons to explain the "moving in and moving out" process the teens go through. Ms. Larson explained that the goal of Beacon is to "catch" the teens as early as possible. When a teen moves in a rent is established and each year the rent goes up until the teen(s) is ready to move out. Throughout their stay the teens are provided with services that counsel them on work skills, school and independence after they leave Beacon. Acting Chair Potts thanked the applicants for their presentation and stated in summary the City needs to be mindful of the master planning of the area in their decision making process; however, the project as presented is intriguing, adding density without an increase in traffic and providing affordable safe housing for teens. Both are goals of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. Page 5 of 11 M� f Min esLEdina City Council[May 20.2014 noted th when,a PUD request comes forward, there would be a presumption of the underlying zoning district requ ements. It was acknowled d that the Council had an understanding that at some point in time, it w d consider a broader application f PUDs. Concern was expressed that no such understanding was ted in the public record, this was being onsidered in response to a single development'request and ch a radical change „ .. should have included blic notice and opportunity for comment. Mr. Te ue stated the .Plashing Commission would.be dev oping guidelines and specifics relating to sustaina ity. Mayor Hovland opened the puxc hearing at 8:05 p.m. Public.Testimony . Carol Lansing, legal counsel for Lenna Corporation, address the Council. Steven Schwab, 6740 Washburn Avenue Richfield, dressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded ember Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson; And Motion carried. .. The Co/nn indicated support for ho ing this discussi now as there had been several years' experience with Pd this review should ave occurred regardl s of the Lennar project. It was pointed out that Edina ever been known s a City that lacked flexib 'ty but had been known for its flexibility in considthe needs of d elopers: Concern was expres d with lack of public notice and that the amendwould result' changing the character of the.comm nity too quickly, not providing balance or encourpublic tru Member Swenson made a motion to rant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2014 -1Ordina ce Amendment Regarding Planned Unit Deve pment Applicability in an R -1, R -2, and PRistric . Member Brindle seconded the motion. RollcaAyes: , Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: tt Motio ed. COMMUNITY COMMENT Solberg, 4508 Moorland Avenue, voiced his concerns and that of several r 'sidents relating to the ty of Btowndale Bridge and requested extension of a centerline. Vlll. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VIILA. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED — 3330 66' STREET Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the sketch plan to remodel and expand the existing TCF Bank building at 3330 66th Street into 39 uhits.of small (355 to 456 square feet) studio apartments for young adults experiencing homelessness. In addition, the ,building would contain offices for on -site service providers, property management, a community area; fitness area, computer lab, and laundry room. Mr. Teague indicated that to accommodate this request, it would require a rezoning from POD -I, Planned Office District -I to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to allow housing other than Senior Housing in the Regional Medical District. He presented the site plan, issues identified, and stated the Planning Commission considered this sketch plan at its April 23, 2014, meeting. Proponent Presentation Lee Blons, Executive Director of Beacon Interfaith Collaborative, presented their mission statement and indicated they currently had 500 apartments in 15 buildings under management. Ms. Blons presented the Page 4 M Minutes /Edina City Council /May 20, 2014 concept model to secure affordable housing with integrated services and adult guidance for homeless teens. (18-19 year olds). She estimated that in the;area of Edina, there were 250 to 300 young people in. need of this type of housing and the requested 39 units was based on available funding. The Council asked questions of Ms. Blons who assured the Council that they were committed to being the best landlord in Edina "'and if necessary, 24 -hour staffing would be provided. She stated Lydia Apartments, built for chronically homeless adults with mental health and chemical dependent issues, provided 24 -hour services and she would check whether any of their other buildings provided 24 -hour service. Ms. Blons stated this would not be a shelter or drop -in facility. She answered questions of the Council related to Beacon's services and programming to successfully move young adults into the community. Sarah Larson, Project Manager with Beacon, indicated the total development cost was estimated to be over $10 million with an estimated per unit cost of $250,000. It was noted that this estimated cost was similar to that of Nicollet Square (42 units) and most other projects submitted to Minnesota Housing. Ms. Blons assured the Council that this would be quality housing of which Edina would be proud. With regard to financing, she indicated they,would address cost containment and.were required to acquire a site prior to obtaining financing. Beacon believed there had been a high level of support for this Edina location. Bart Nelson, Urban Works Architecture, displayed the location map, pointing out the abundance of parking, bus stops, and close proximity to the transit station. He described elements of the plan and how this. project would meet the City's sustainability objectives. Ms. Larson indicated the funding for this project required compliance with the standards of Minnesota Green Communities which included exceeding the State's energy standard by 15 %. Following discussion of the 3330 66th Street sketch plan, the Council offered the following comments: creating an integrated streetscape and integrated fence design; change in topography to create more daylight into the three lower -level studios; providing, proof of parking to address parking shortage; providing for outdoor bicycle parking; providing indoor bicycle storage during the off season; designing articulated building.surfaces; exceeding State energy guidelines; consideration of affordable housing rather ha tn specialty housing so the City had a higher level of control; and, providing best practice relating to 24- hour service. , The Council expressed support for having this use in Edina, adaptive use of this site that was in close proximity to transportation, and meeting the School District's and City's core value of not leaving anyone behind. The Council indicated that a Small Area Plan was not needed in this instance as it was a good interim use and allowed the area to develop organically over time. Ms. Blons stated they had been in conversation with the neighborhood and received a good response. The Council encouraged the proponent to continue working with the neighborhood to address their concerns. VULB. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED —7134 YORK AVENUE Mr. Teague presented the sketch plan to uild a four -sto uilding with 100 units (70 units of senior housing with services and 30 memory care %te of sisted living west of the Yorktown Continental Senior Living Apartments at 7151 York Avenu fisting site was 5.85 acres in size with a density of 45 units per acre. With the proposed addition of its, this density would increase to 64 units per acre. Mr. Teague reviewed the Council's past c sideration or a 76 -unit senior housing project. He displayed the site plan, noting its orientation a g York Avenue, urface and underground parking. It was noted that while the Comprehensive Pla escribed High Densit Residential as 12 -30 units per acre, density for senior housing might be incre ed. Mr. Teague presente site conditions that could be considered for higher density in this insta e: It was noted the Planning C mission considered this sketch plan at its April 23, 2014, meeting. a Council asked questions of Mr. Tea a relating to site plan revisions since the Planning Commission's consideration. Page 5 Ad, " Mr. James Hovland, Mayor Ms. Jon! Bennett, City Council Member Ms. Mary. Brindle, City.Council Member Mr. John Sprague, City Council Member Ms. Ann Swenson, City Council Member Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50`x' St. Edina, MN 55424 August 19, 2014 Re: Letter opposing rezoning the Regional Medical area Dear Council Members, After attending the City Planning meeting on August 13, 2014,1 left with many unanswered questions. Primarily, how does providing "supportive" service i.e.: money management, employment coaching and help with job internships remotely fit in with medical services? It appears this project is being pushed through without thorough planning and true fiduciary responsibility. Dozens of public meetings have been held in major cities to create affordable housing. Who has researched best practices used around the country that provide clear, measureable outcomes to curb homelessness? While the apartments would apply toward 39 affordable housing units in the city, have you considered the revenue in property taxes lost in a premier Regional Medical area? While Beacon has worked on this project for years, has the city engaged citizens (Tom Nelson, a real estate agent has offered his assistance) to find a neighborhood for this project? More space availability at a much lesser cost would be beneficial. Sustainability of 66"' West is over 8&6 dependent on.government funding while less than 20% is private donations. 1 listened to how important the neighbors are to homeless young people. I agree. The 66v' West proposal does not offer neighborhood support. From 8PM to 8AM there will be a front desk worker opening the door. There are no citizens nearby to help, guide and hold them accountable for unacceptable behaviors on the grounds and surrounding areas. Teenagers make poor decisions. Homeless young adults according to Beacon are victims. Keep. in mind, many victims become perpetrators. Mental Illness, addiction and physical /sexual abuse issues will arise. While there is a no drug/alcohol policy included in the lease, who is ultimately responsible for infractions? Look at dorm rooms and the risky behaviors that occur. At least there are Resident Assistants and a Head Resident living with the young people. It takes a neighborhood community to support and sometimes provide tough love to nurture productive members of our society. Look at the police reports and you do the math regarding monthly calls to 3710 Nicollet Ave. Interview all their neighbors to ascertain their concerns. Look at the facts, not the emotional aspect. Respectfully, Terri Merz 6525 Barrie Rd Edina, MN 55435 Susan and Harris McCarty 6324 Barrie Road M Edina, MN 55425 August 16, 2014 Edina Mayor James Hovland City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, Ann Swenson We were very disappointed in the 3/13/14 city council meeting that was set up to discuss a zoning change, from a commercially zoned building space to a housing for homeless youth complex. We were disappointed to find out how little advance notice.was given to members of the Immediate community who would be actually impacted by the project, vs. individuals from the religious organization who support it, yet have no ties to the neighborhood. It was quite obvious that Individuals associated with Beacon Faith group supporting the project were given months to prepare for the meeting, whereas business and property owners adjacent to the project had less than a few weeks to prepare for the rezoning meeting. Although this location may benefit the youth for its unskilled, low paying, job opportunities at Southdale Mall, this is hardly an appropriate location for this project. This proposed housing project will negatively impact the community. It will lower property values, and potentially put residents safety at risk. It may also discourage future commercial development In the area due to the stigma attached to the project. This community houses a number of vulnerable adults. Step by Step Montessori school is right next door to the proposed project. The Colony of Edina, which was initially built as a 55+ housing apartment complex, continues to house a large community of retired senior citizens, as do other housing complexes on York Avenue. The Heritage of Edina, which is less than 2 blocks from the proposed project, houses vulnerable adults in their assisted living, nursing care, and their new special needs Eric's Ranch buildings. The Edina Care Center and Southdale hospital are just a block from the proposed site. Several healthcare specialty facilities also adjoin the proposed site, Please keep this site zoned for commercial use only, and continue to support bringing in more healthcare based facilities to our neighborhood to meet the needs of area residents. Thank you. Susan and Harris McCarty Cary Teague From: Rich Colestock <rec6613. @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 11:58 AM To: Cary Teague; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle ( Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Paula. Colestock Subject: Planning Commission and City Council - Project 66 West City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council Members: I attended the planning commission hearing last night after recently learning of a plan to convert the TCF building on 66th Street into a low income housing facility for homeless young adults. Although, I did not stay until the end of the public comment section of the meeting (if was getting late and repetitive), I'm interested in the outcome and the decision made by the planning commission. I am currently neither for nor against the proposed use of the TCF site, but do believe the argument presented by the applicants and the vast (and overwhelming) number of supporters they brought to the meeting last night was somewhat myopic in its approach. No one can rationally argue against the mission of providing affordable housing opportunities to those who truly need help. However strong our zeal is to help those in need, there are other stake holders and issues in this situation that need and deserve to be considered before a decision is made to re -zone the property in question. I think most people would support the re- zoning effort when and' if'the issues of economic impact, personal security, and future use possibilities are publicly addressed with real data and statistics based on how these types of projects affect the surrounding neighbors and businesses. The legal, technical and moral obligation aspects were well (enough) covered last night, but there were some aspects that were left uncovered as well (at least in the time I was there): 1. What are the future use possibilities for this property: once it is re- zoned? Is it possible that it could be converted to other uses such as a half -way house to help transition criminals back to society (or other non- desirable uses). What is the law here? How do we protect against unintended or undesired use in the future? 2. What kind of safe guards will be in place to ensure drug and alcohol use will be monitored and controlled (considering the target market for tenants includes those under 21). Is it legally possible to do this? 3. What are the real crime or police statistics (base line and post implementation) for similar projects both here and in other cities around the country - not just this for this applicant. We heard two sets of numbers last night from two biased sources. 4. How do we think it will impact nearby businesses that could be in social conflict with the sites proposed usage? The day care business behind the property comes to mind. I can honestly say that given a range of comparable choices, I would not choose to put my -young child or infant in a day care facility in such close proximity to low income housing - not because bad people necessarily live there, but because of the perceived risk. What about the residential properties behind 66 West? How will 66 West impact vacancy rates (in rentals), and property resale values because perspective renters and buyers may choose other options due to the ,)roximity of 66 West? 5. Several times, it was quoted: that this is the best site in Edina for this kind of facility, but other, considered, sites were not discussed. What were those other sites and why are they inferior to this one? These are pretty bas ic and rational questions and I'm sure have been considered. If all of these have been researched and answered by the city and the planning commission, then please be transparent with the community and share that information. In summary, I believe the City of :Edina has an obligation to socialize this project with residents and business owners a bit more, and take a full 360 degree: view of it before -taking.action (either up or down). Assurances. from the applicant and its supporters I are not enough to convince me (and surely others) that the positive impact of 66 West will outweigh the potential and possibly longer term negative impact to the surrounding community. Thanks Rich Colestock 6613 Southcrest Drive Edina, MN 2 Cary 'Teague From: Dave Nichols <nicholsedina @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:12 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Planning Commission Subject: Beacon Housing proposal on 66th Street Please share this comment with the members of the Planning Commission. The proposal to transform the current TCF site into housing for homeless youth has our support. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative has established itself as an innovative project and program at 38th and Nicollet. Young people, many who have aged out of foster care, need a supportive environment to begin to build a useful and productive life. Young people who have come through the 38th project have spoken about the importance of having their own space for which they are responsible and the availability of services that assist them with the issues they have faced and are currently facing. The TCF site is close to the bus line and there are starter jobs within walking distance. Giving these young people a hand up to become productive adults adds value to the Edina/Richfield communities. This project will be done well and is a critical part of the effort to ending homelessness. Suann and Dave Nichols 6566 France Avenue S. #303 Edina, MN 55435 1 EDINA EAST LLC c% Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis MN 55401 August 12, 2014 Via email to: Kevin Staunton, Chair, Edina Planning Commission & Members of the Edina Planning Commission RE: Opposition to Request for Re- Zoning & Amendment to Comprehensive Plan TCF .Bank Building — ("Subject Site") 3330 West 66`h Sheet, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mr. Staunton & Members of the Commission: This letter is a supplement to our letter to the Planning Commission dated July 21, 2014 and our letter to the City Council dated May 19`h, 2014 copies of which are attached. We own the property immediately east of the Subject Site at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building"). We will be at the public hearing tomorrow evening to speak. In addition to the information in our letters we ask you to consider three (3) things: • First, we fully understand and support the need for supportive housing for young adults.. In the Minneapolis residential neighborhood where my family lives, we are financial contributors to a facility blocks from our home. I drive by it on my way to work and our daughters and their friends pedal by it on their way to Sebastian Joe's for ice cream. • Second, we have been commercial real estate investors and developers in Edina and in this neighborhood for three generations. We choose to invest in part because as one of you noted at the last meeting, "Great cities were built with plans in mind." Edina planners and leaders do not make reactive decisions or engage in hurried "spot zoning" to placate non - conforming projects. They listen to the sentiment and plan smartly —the expansion of the Regional Medical District in the Comp Plan is a perfect example. Third, does this request represent the best effort of the City to facilitate the need for supportive housing projects? Has there been, as Chairman Staunton remarked, "Structured conversation ... that involves the public ?" Are the use and its rules clear? Is just 39 units on a site that costs nearly 2.5 times that of comparable housing sites in the Southdale area and requires complete rezoning, multiple variances and an amendment to the Comp Plan the best that can be done? Could better planning lead to doubling or tripling the opportunities to build supportive facilities in Edina without the need for such complicated land use changes? We urge the Commission to deny the proposed requests and seek alternative locations. We would look forward to voluntarily being part of working with the City and the developer to pursue more suitable sites. Very truly yours, EDINA EAST LLC Thomas M. Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members cc: Mayor Hovland, Scott Neal, and Cary Teague EDINA EAST LLC c % :Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis MN 55401 July 21, 2014 Via email to: Kevin Staunton, Chair, Edina Planning Commission & Members of the Edina Planning Commission RE: Proposed Redevelopment Plan by Beacon Interfaith Housing Opposition to.Request for Re- Zoning & Amendment to Comprehensive Plan TCF Bank Building — ( "Subject Site ") 3330 West 66`h Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mr. Staunton & Members of the Commission: We own the property immediately east at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building "), which we purchased from the tax - exempt American Cancer Society and redeveloped for medical and commercial use. Both our property and the Subject Site are located within the City of Edina's prized and consistently growing Regional Medical District (the "RMD "). This district was expanded as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and we oppose re- zoning and/or amending the. Comp Plan to allow for any non - conforming use that will dilute the full potential of its intended zoning allowances. The RMD allows for up to 12 stories of height to accommodate a variety of intense uses that have synergy with its long standing anchor, Fairview Southdale Hospital, and its ever expanding volume of surgery centers, medical office space, clinics, laboratories, general office and other supportive commercial uses. The district was expanded in 2008 because it represents an important part of Edina's current and future reputation as a nationally recognized top tier community with the ability to attract the type of uses afforded by having a thriving RMD across the street from regional mall. In line with the goals of the expanded RMD, significant capital was invested to re- purpose our Edina East Building by ownership and our tenants, Dermatology Specialists, PA and Peoples Bank of Commerce. The magnitude of use was increased, the property was added back to Edina's commercial property tax rolls and it is now a viable component of the RMD. The same is occurring with the recent construction of the Twin Cities Orthopedics Building, the $42 million expansion of Fairview Southdale Hospital, the 60,000 square foot addition by IRET to Southdale Medical and Mount Development's 6500 France Senior Housing project. Other capable developers have footholds near the Subject Site with United Properties owning the Southdale Place Building and parking lot immediately west and Ryan Companies now managing the two buildings on the underdeveloped 5.67 acre site one parcel east at the comer of 66h and York. Mr. Kevin Staunton City of Edina Planning Commission July 21, 2014 Page 2 Guiding responsible commercial development has been a cornerstone of intelligent City leadership creating "win - wins" for developers, citizens and the City. Changing current law to allow the proposed development would be a "win" fora single, non - conforming project, but a confusing "lose" for the RMD and its owners who have based their planning and investments on the wishes the City of Edina outlined in its Comprehensive.Plan as the highest, and best use for the Subject Site. Once the laws are.changed they will be difficult, if not impossible to reverse for a completed project likely subject to 30 plus year affordable housing financing. We urge the Planning Commission, City Council and City . Planners to use their expertise to seek "win -win" alternatives fo'r the Beacon concept rather than rush through- substantial, "one -off' modifications on an expensive site in the middle of the RMD at agateway comer to one of only two north -south arteries through the RMD (Barrie Road). Randomly carving out this site this could have a negative effect on larger re- developments that may involve assembly of parcels and/or require these comers for best access and visibility. We note that Beacon's willingness and ability to pay more than double the most recent comparable multi - family land cost per unit (Subject Site: $2.3 million/39 units = $59,000 /unit vs. 7200 France site: $5.5 million/195 units = $28,200 /unit) will greatly expand the pool of potential alternatives. We have met with the Beacon representatives, toured their inspiring projects and are aware of the well intended populist sentiment garnered at church gatherings and through pre - printed supportive post card signings. It is clear that there is citizen support for a Beacon project in Edina so why shouldn't it be located where it can offer a "win -win" for those-served by the concept without compromising the potential of the expanded Regional Medical District? We request the that the Planning Commission and City Council deny the requests for rezoning and a Comp Plan amendment and continue to work with the developer to seek alternatives so the concept can move forward. Very truly yours, EDINA EAST LLC Thomas M. Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members CC Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Cary Teague, Edina Community Development Director EDINA EAST LLC c %.Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis AN 55401 May 19, 2014 Via email to: Mayor Jim Hovland & Members of the Edina City Council RE: Tuesday, May 20th Council Meeting Proposed Redevelopment Plan — Sketch Plan Review TCF Bank Building — ( "Subject Site ") 3330 West 66th Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mayor Hovland & Members of the Council: We own the property immediately east at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building "), which we purchased from the tax - exempt American Cancer Society in 2004 and redeveloped for medical and commercial use in 2006. Both our property and the Subject Site are located within the City of Edina's prized and consistently growing Regional Medical District (the "RMD "). Significant capital was invested tore- purpose the Edina East Building by ownership and our tenants, Dermatology Specialists, PA and Peoples Bank of Commerce. The magnitude of use was increased, the property was added back to Edina's commercial property tax rolls and it is now a viable component the RMD. These efforts in 2006 were only an initial step toward realizing the full re- development potential afforded by the zoning guidelines of the RMD as part of the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The guidelines allow for up to 12 stories of height to accommodate a variety of intense uses that have synergy with the RMD's long standing anchor, Fairview Southdale Hospital and its ever expanding volume of surgery centers, medical office space, clinics, laboratories, general pffice and other supportive commercial uses. The district is zoned this way because represents an important part of Edina's current and future reputation as a nationally recognized top tier community with the ability to attract the type of uses afforded by having a thriving RMD across the street from regional mall. We oppose amending the Comprehensive Plan to allow for any non - confirming use that will dilute the full potential of the RMD's zoning allowances. In particular we object because the Subject Site represents a small, but centrally located primary comer on one of only two north -south arteries through the RMD (Barrie Road). Allowing for a_small, Mayor Hovland Members of Edina City Council May 19, 2014, Page 2 non - conforming use on a key corner could.negatively affect larger re- developments. that may involve assembly of parcels and/or require these corners for proper: access and visibility. We further oppose as the City has an abundance of other districts where it could accommodate the proposed use where all involved could gain from its intended benefits without having to compromise. the benefits of an important site within a thriving, well planned and dedicated Regional Medical District. We hope that the City can work with-the developer to identify these locations and that their project can continue to move forward. Very truly yours, EDINA EAST LLC 1 Thomas M. Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members CC Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Carey Teague, Edina Community Development Director August 12, 2014 Chairman Kevin Staunton & Planning Commission Members City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Re- zoning of 3330 W. 6e Street Dear Mr. Chair and Planning Commission Members: We are Step By Step Montessori Schools. We are one of the. largest Montessori School organizations in the United States. We operate 8 Montessori Schools and Child Care Centers in the Twin Cities and serve about 1200 children. We are not a "big business" or a franchise; we are a small, locally owned and operated school. We operate a location for the residents of Edina at 6519 Barrie Road. Step By Step has been in this location. for 23 years and under prior ownership a Montessori School has served the residents of Edina in this location since 1973. Step By Step has owned the building since 1993. We invested in the area when many would not and we have continued to make significant investment in the area to ensure that residents have an exceptional school to bring their young children. When deciding to invest in the area much of our decision was predicated on the zoning laws in the area, typically we do not operate our centers in residentially zoned areas. At that time we felt very comfortable making our investment based on the stated direction by the city of Edina. Currently we serve approximately 150 children age six weeks through six years in this location. Approximately 88 of those children and their families are current residents of Edina. Over the years we've prepared thousands of children in. Edina for a lifetime love of learning. We have become a trusted partner for providing high quality early education for the children in the community. We submitted a letter to the City. of Edina on June 91' regarding our concerns for the Beacon Project. Unfortunately I did not see that letter included or the other letters of opposition we know have been submitted to the city in your staff reports for the July 23`d Planning Commission meeting. What I did see was some pre- printed post cards with some names of people who may or may not be residents of Edina supporting the project. I'm sure you appreciate filling out a pre- printed card after church on Sunday supporting a project that will in no way impact you personally is certainly different then the letter that I am writing to you today. We were concerned at the City Council Sketch Plan'review on May 206' that several council members voiced, on the public record, such strong support for the project prior to hearing, form the planning commission. We were also concerned that on June 3"1 the City Council approved submission of the funding request to the state without having completed the re- zoning process. It appears that certain members of the city staff and the City Council is obviously biased towards the success of this project without regard to the desires of the people most impacted by Beacon's Administration office: 4355 Highway 169 O Plymouth, NIN 55442 C 763- 557 -6777 School Loc dons: Edina- Southdale o Brooklyn Part: 0 Chaska a Corcoran 0 AMaple Crutr o 11Iyr10uth 0 St. Anthony1I nzata l,iiclgt:dalc Planning Commission Aug 12, 2014 Page 2 presence, their potential neighbors. We'll reiterate our concerns since they are quite troubling to me and my fellow neighbors. SUPPORTIVE HOUSING GROUP HOME Quite simply this project is a supportive group home. The teenagers and young adults living in this supportive housing project receives tax-payer funded subsidies and they receive many on -site support services including some form of counseling. To me this implies this is a supporting housing group home; what this project is not is affordable housing. The cost per apartment is approximately $250,000. There are many people living in homes that cost less than just one 375 square foot apartment. Just so you have a frame of reference at this cost it implies that a.2000 sq, foot home would cost $1.35M. Couldn't this money be put to better use in a more affordable location to help more than just 39 young people? CRIME AND CHILDREN ARE NOT COMPATIBLE We are responsible for the safety and security of over 150 children every week day from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm. Our own investigation into the other Minneapolis based Beacon properties show some concerning information regarding the number of police visits to their properties. I've included those police reports for your review. Table 1 is a summary of the number of calls to the various addresses over the last 24 months. What this information shows is there is an average of 14 police visits to the average Beacon property per month. That's one every other day. Our school has called the police twice in 24 months (a false fire alarm and suspicious car). The Colony townhomes area had 63 calls over the same time period, that's 2.75 calls per month. What that means is, based on the average Beacon property, we can expect an approximate 418% increase in criminal activity in the area once the project is complete. This seems like an excessive number of calls and leaves us with lots of unanswered questions regarding the impact to the children in our program. What Beacon will lead you to believe is the calls are for fairly innocuous events and that the calls just originate at the Beacon addresses and it's not the residents causing the problems. The calls range from fights, assaults, domestic abuse, theft, burglary and property damage or in other words criminal activity. The bottom line is the police were called to the address and you don't know if the issue was due to a Beacon resident or not. We are merely pointing out the facts provided by the Minneapolis Police Department. As we have stated before we believe crime and children are not compatible. You say you want to help the 39 teenagers with this project? I'm hopeful you have taken into consideration all the unintended consequences associated with this project and that they are completely understood? Number of Beacon o F Apts Properties, .. N F Avg Calls 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 r°+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 x 1 2 3 4 5 6 r°4 Grand Total Per Month 19 1926 3rd Ase Sotah 1 2 3 3 7 1 5 22 3 10 10 4 4 7 7 2. 3 5 2 57 :::s 7 2 13 92 4.4 .; 30 11S 54thSpeet Fast 1 3 1, 3 1 9 1 1 1 2 2. 2 9'; 3 2 1 6 24 1.7 , 35 1501 Ha%Amme Ave 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 `1 . 1 3 3 8 19 1.7 :. 21 1801 1st A,e Somh 3 2 4 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2. 3 15 1 3 2 6 32 1.8 40 . 1920Lasall:A%e ::. 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 5 12 l 1 2 15 1.7 10 3146 Cedes' ANT 3 2 1 1 3 2 12 1 4 3 2 4 14 .,1 4 2 2 9 35 P. 40 3710,NoletAve .: 1 5 3 2 6 4 21 2, 3 2 1 4. 2 1 6 21 2 4 3 11 4 2 26 68 3.4, 12 3806 3rd Ave Sotah 1 l 1 3 3 1 6 1.5 42 . 5360 Rnerview Road 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 2, 4 9 1,3 30 951Loly Ave NE 4 4 3 1 1 13 2 2 4 2 6 3 5 4 1 3 5 37 2 2 3 7 57 3.0 Grand Total 1 18 19 12 17 12 14 93 10 1622 9 15 18 20 15 5 11 24 15 180 6 16 14 25 15 8 84 357 14.3 Table 1 Planning Commission Aug 12, 2014 Page 3 NEGATIVE PARKING IMPACTS This area has struggled with parking for a number of years. Rezoning will only add to the congestion and further exasperate a difficult situation. When events are held at our school many, times there is not enough parking for parents, grandparents and other visitors. The congestion in the area presents a safety concern for young mothers and their children during drop off and pick up time. Our parents walk through these parking lots with their young children and our children play on playgrounds adjacent to their parking lots. I not the traffic report in your staff information. What that report did not review was the flow of traffic within the various parking lots. This is the area of concern we have, not the amount of traffic on surface streets. Our parking lot is located less than 120 feet from the proposed Beacon parking lot. Has the commission requested a parking study be completed of the immediate area to understand the specific impact this project may present to existing people and businesses in the area. ZONING INTEGRITY & RE- ZONING PROCESS As we mentioned above, this project is a supportive group home, not affordable housing. Once you start down a path to all oy✓ rezoning for this type of project you can no longer maintain the integrity of any, other zoning that exists in the city. 'We have invested substantially in this property over the last 23 years. This includes paying over $600,0001n property taxes. We have a number of planned renovation projects approaching $100,000 which may need to be placed on hold pending the direction of this project and the potential- impact to our school. Just to provide you a frame of reference, our school is located Northeast of the TCF Bank building approximately 100 yards from the middle of the current TCF Bank parking lotto our frorit. door, our lot line is within 100 feet of the lot line of the current bank. We noticed that an initial. public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 1000 yards of the proposed project on July 11'h, we never received such notice. We also noticed on the various layouts for the project submitted to the city that we were not included as being an adjacent property on any of the documentation. The staff report also does not list us as an adjacent property owner. It appears that we are purposefully being excluded from participating in the conversation regarding this re- zoning. This leads me to believe that Beacon also believes there is an incompatibility in the neighborhood. Some other facts regarding the communication for this project; Ms. Blons has stated publically that she reached out to many of the neighbors in the area and they are supportive of the project. Ms. Blons only reached out to Step By Step Montessori after we submitted our opposition letter to the City, she has still not reached out to her closest neighbors. All of the adjacent property owners are opposed to this project. The question remains would our neighbors even know about this project if they hadn't read about it in the paper? Ms. Blons spoke so passionately about how transparent their organization is but we feel quite the opposite. When meeting with Ms. Blons there was no conversation about how we could work together to assimilate their organization into the neighborhood, Beacon was not interested in hearing about any of the concerns we had or working to address those concerns. We attended the open house informing people about this project sponsored by Beacon Interfaith what we heard was Beacon was a very good property manager, but even as a good property' manager Beacon cannot tell us the types of backgrounds of the residents we could expect to live in the area. Most professional property management organizations run criminal background checks on all their tenants and Beacon said they do not. They couldn't guarantee us there would be 240 supervision of the teenagers living in this complex, a concern even Ms. Bennett (Edina City Council) has regarding the project. Ms. Blons also mentioned during a meeting that she had .worked closely with the city planning staff during site Planning Commission Aug 1.2; 2014 Page .4 selection. There appears to be a pattern of deception regarding this project. I only hope this is an oversight and not some attempt to influence this - process. ALTERNATIVE SITES I have personally visited 5 Beacon sites in the Minneapolis area. I wanted to see what we could expect from the organization. What I saw were complexes that fit into their surrounding.communitie's.. They were completely appropriate for residents as.wel.l as their neighbors., I wish I could say, the -same fok the project at 3330 W 60'. Street. Ms. Blons mentioned that she worked with the ciy planning staff for 2 years to find a suitable site and there was nothing else available in the city. of Edina. I took some time and am offering some alternative,sites which may be more suited for a project.like.this, sites that are most likely more affordable, allowing more young adults to be served while accomplishing the same .objective. 5146 Eden Ave North, the site of the old Edina Public Works, plenty. of land, close to jobs_ and transportation. 4113 50' St W (Edina Community Lutheran Church) this 4.13 acre lot could surely spare the .99 acres needed for the building. The Fred Richards Golf Course, is,adjacent to existing multi- family complexes, close to' transportation and jobs. In conclusion we urge the commission to deny any request to rezone the property, located at 3330 66t.' Street West (currently TCF Bank). Step, By Step Montessori is more than a property managemeint company, we,deal with a family's most precious assets, their children. Many prospective parents hear that a project like the proposed one is coming to the area and their imaginations conjure up all kind's of scenarios of how their children will be impacted, mainly adversely impacted, whether realistic or not does not matter. We have already had a couple comments from prospective parents asking if£we.were aware of the project. Needless to say they did not enroll their children at just the mention of someone running a facility for teens in the area. In conclusion, we certainly applaud your leadership in trying to support teens in transition and for finding an 'Appropriate site where everyone in the community can embrace these young adults and support them as they work to become self - sufficient adults. Sincerely, Rose Minor President Step By Step Montessori Schools 6519 Barrie Road .Edina, MN 55435 763 -557 -6777 CC: Cary Teague, cteagne@EdinaMN.gov y Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612):673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6/27/2014 Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Call count: 32 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 18011 AV S Date /time Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. 7/4/2012 10:52:42 PM Assault in Progress All OK 12- 206903 B2 7/6/2012 2:47:00 AM Sound of Shots Fired 12- 208365 7/7/2012 10:47:47 PM Sound of Shots Fired Cancel 12- 210436 8/21/2012 8:12:29 PM Down Outside -One Cancel 12- 264341 8/26/2012 1:10:28 AM Disturbance Unfounded 12- 269461 9/4/2012 12:36:00 AM Attempted Suicide Assist 12- 279864 9/7/2012 3:03:16 AM Music -Loud 12- 283501 9/19201211:20:16PM Loud Party Advised 12- 293747 9/16/2012 9:10:33 PM Damage Property-In Progress Report 12- 294709 B2 10/24/2012 5:01:06 PM Unwanted Person Sent 12- 335329 11/9/2012 12:24:34 AM Disturbance 12- 349930 1/22/2013 1:40:09 AM Assist Fire Personnel Assist 13- 019680 16 2/12/2013 9:16:08 PM Traffic Law Enforcement Advised 13- 041346 3/21/2013 2:09:43 AM Sound of Shots Fired Information 13- 082963 4/22/2013 2:10:22 PM ' Traffic Law Enforcement Advised 13- 121456 5/5/2013 10:10:17 PM Suspected Prostitute Gone on Arrival 13- 137801 6/11/2013 8:35:17•AM Disturbance 13- 182912 7/13/2013 8:27:25 PM Unwanted Person Information 13- 225128 7/16/2013 1:19:25 PM Check the Welfare All OK 13- 228351 33 9/17/2013 11:45:58 AM Property Damage/Hit & Run Gone on Arrival 13- 307446 9/36/2013 2:47:03 AM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Unable to Locate 13- 322465 B2 10/2/2013 5:20:48 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Transport 13- 325666 35 10/21/2013 10:12:08 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Transport 13- 350674 12 . 11/3/2013 5:48:36 PM Check the Welfare Unfounded 13- 366533 16 111912013 8:48:06 PM Down Outside-One Transport 13- 374145 11/22/2013 1:45:21 AM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Booking 13- 388922 B2 4/11/2014 5:27:22 AM Explosion Unfounded 14- 116303 5/3/201410:39:33 PM Neiglibor'Trouble Advised 14- 145399 13 5/4/2014 9:26:19 PM Attempt Pick -Up Booking 14- 146532 11 5/19/201410:22:58 PM Check the Welfare All OK 14- 166011 11 6/16/2014 9:00:53 AM Theft - Report Only Report 14- 204168 13 6/21/201412:24:54 PM Drunk/Intoxicated Person Transport 14- 211804 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management -Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave.,. Minneapolis, MN 55406 . (612) 673- 3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6127/2014" Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Call count: 57 Pet 2 ADDRESS: 951 LOWRX AV NE Dateltime Problem Disposition Case # Apt/Mr. 7/1/2012 5:53 :13,PM Silent Alarm False 12- 203075 7/10/2012 5:20:11 PM Check the Welfare No Service 12- 213471 104 7/14/201211:55:41 PM Disturbance Advised 12- 218978 7/15/2012 10:23:11 AM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Advised 12- 219425 103 8/7/2012 7:16 :05 PM Suspicious Person Gone on Arrival 12- 247251 103 8/17/2012 9:17:28 AM Theft - Report Only Report 12- 259048 8/19/20121:00:02 AM Disturbance Gone on Arrival 12- 261442 8/27/201211:13:17 PM Holdup Alarm Assist 12- 271449 10/5/20121:05:33 PM Unwanted Person Unfounded 12- 314585 306 10/12/20127:45:34 PM Panic Alarm All OK 12- 322273 10/31/20121:42:32 PM Suspicious Person Information 12- 341959 306 11/17/20121:27:44 AM Music -Loud All Quiet 12- 357642 12116/20124:24:33 PM Domestic Assist 12- 385139 206 1/1/2013 4:03:21 AM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Booking 13- 000343 303 1/28/201318:07:03 AM Missing Person Advised 13- 025625 116 1/28/2013 6:27:30 PM Domestic Advised 13- 026101 116 2/1/2013 5:49:47 PM Missing Person Report 13- 030244 2/23/2013 12:51.26 PM TrafFic1aw Enforcement All OK 13- 053136 3/3/2013 3:22:13 PM Check the Welfare All OK 13- 062682 302 3/7/2013 12:18:41 PM Assist Other Agency Assist 13- 066902 3/31/2013,5:42:51 AM Disturbance Cancel 13- 095093 3/31/2013 5.47:33 AM Suspicious Vehicle Booking 13- 095094 4/21/2013 12:56:46 AM Unknown Trouble • Advised 13- 119970 4/29/2013 9:50:52 PM Domestic Abuse Report Only Advised 13- 130878 103 5/7/2013 10 :50:37 PM Threats Report 13440525 305 5/9/2013 3:56:20 AM Disturbance All Quiet 13- 142024 5/13/2013 11:50:59 PM Damage Property -In Progress Transport 13;147747 5/16/2013 12:46:39 AM Loud Party Advised 13- 150389 302 5/22/2013 2:28:46 AM Disturbance Advised _ 13- 157801 3 FLR 5/26/2013 1:20:11 AM Disturbance All OK 13- 163085 302 6/1/2013 2:08:10 AM Music -Loud 13- 170286 6/19/2013 5:28 :14 PM Robbery'ofPerson No Service 13- 193961 6/26/2013 1:34:32 PM Disturbance Advised 13- 203103 302 7/2/2013 6:42:48 PM Recover Vehicle Report 13- 211191 7/19/2013 9:03:05•PM Silent Alarm All OK 13- 233086 7/20/2013 2:03:40 AM Fight 13- 233486 7/20/2013 2:07:02 AM Fight Sent 13- 233491 7/23/2013 6:09:34 PM Theft - Report Only Report 13- 237679 Page 1 of 2 Pct 2 ADDRESS: 951 LOWRY AV NE Datettime Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Flr. 8/12/2013 5:11:02 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Assist 13- 263179 206 8/14/2013 11:31:07 PM Disturbance Gone. on Arrival 13- 266187 8/25/2013 8:50:01 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Sent 13- 279901 8/31/2013 10:26:10 PM Disturbance Advised 13- 287503 9/30/2013 8:15:09 PM Parking Problem Inservice 13- 323274 10/11/2013 2:24:51 PM Disturbance Sent 13- 337567 10/28/2013 6:45:24 AM Check the Welfare All OK 13- 358335 206 10/28/2013 9:48:16 PM Domestic Advised 13- 359157 312 11/1/2013 10:42:18 PM Disturbance Transport 13- 364288 312 11/2/2013 9:12:20 PM Burglary Dwing In Progress Unfounded 13- 365477 112 11/8/2013 9:55:47 AM Audible Business Alarm 13- 372261 11/26/2013 3:01:12 PM Domestic Abuse Report Only Report 13- 394216 1/7/201411:42:04 PM Suspicious Person Assist 14- 007170 1/9/2014 11:42:11 AM Theft - Report Only 14- 008530 203 219/2014 3:11:41 PM Receive Information Information 14- 043203 103 2/18/2014 9:48:01 PM Domestic Transport 14- 053731 4115/2014 10:53:18 PM Check the Welfare Assist 14- 135439 303 4/29/2014 11:42:23 AM Damage Property-In Progress Tagged •14- 139428 4/29/2014 11:43:56 AM Damage Property-In Progress Cancel 14- 139430 103 Page 2 of 2 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Pct 3 ADDRESS: 3146 CEDAR AV Date/time 7/19/2012 7:16:17 AM 7/19/2012 7:16:21 AM 7/20/201211:01:19 PM 8/17/2012 4:46:01 PM 8/2512012 6:03:30 PM 9/12/20121:10:48 AM 10/30/2012 6:32:34 PM 11/18/2012 6:41:42 PM 11/28/201210:16:51 PM 11/29/20121:58:10 PM 12/14/2012 7:25:44 PM 12/25/2012 3:58:26 PM 1/10/2013 10:10:25 PM 1/12/2013 10:34:11 AM 7/24/2013 6:40:31 PM 7/24/2013 6:40:33 PM 7/24/2013 7:16:01 PM 7/24/2013 8:06:39 PM 8/8/2013 5:31:05 PM 8/12/2013 1:40:56 PM 8/12/2013 3:47:03 PM 11!13/2013 1:09:42 PM 12/2/2013 9:54:13 PM 12/28/2013 2:22:07 AM 12/29/2013 3:20:14 PM 12/29/2013 4:34:32 PM 1/3/2014 12:12:10 AM 2/2/2014 5:42:35 PM 2!2/2014 6:47:30 PM 2/10/201411:00:36 AM 2/17/2014 11:03:47 AM 4/28/2014 6:16:04 PM 4/29/2014 12:59:37 AM 5/2/2014 9:47:12 PM 5/14/201410:47:51 PM Problem Unwanted Person Domestic Domestic Abuse -In Progress Check the Welfare Recover Vehicle Unwanted Person Domestic Abuse -In Progress Domestic Domestic Abuse -In Progress Domestic Abuse -In Progress Robbery of Person Attempted Suicide Music -Loud Domestic Abuse Report Only Domestic Abuse -In Progress Assault in Progress Disturbance Unwanted Person Unwanted Person Domestic Domestic Abuse -In Progress Check the Welfare Loud Party Domestic Neighbor Trouble Neighbor Trouble Music -Loud Neighbor Trouble Neighbor Trouble Threats Fight Domestic Check the Welfare Unwanted Person Emotionally Disturb Person Disposition Cancel All OK Report Unable to Locate Unable to Locate Advised Advised Gone on Arrival Report Booking Report Gone on Arrival Advised Report Cancel Advised All OK Booking Advised Booking Report Advised Advised No Service Advised Advised Assist Advised Advised Information Advised All OK Gone on Arrival Report Run date: 6127/2014 Call count: 35 Case # 12- 223865 12- 223866 12- 226065 12- 259477 12- 268918 12- 289132 12- 341240 12- 359182 12- 368416 12- 368918 12- 383349 12- 392729 13- 009285 13- 010733 13- 239122 13- 239124 13- 239154 13- 239224 13- 258247 13- 262976 13- 263103 13- 390683 13-401378 13-428957 13- 430384 13- 430411 14- 002320 14- 035156 14- 035221 14- 044048 14- 052107 14- 138630 14- 139081 14- 143955 14- 159781 Apt./Fir. 1 202 202 201 201 103 201 201 201 203 2 104 206 104 104 201 104 104 104 2 102 201 Page i of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 671-3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 115 54 ST E Date /time Problem . Disposition 7/2/2012 11:43:59 AM Check the Welfare No Service 8/14/2012 12:05:05 PM Unknown Trouble Assist 8/20/2012 5:59:34 PM Unknown Trouble 311 8/31/2012 2:53:40 AM Notification No Service 9/18/2012 7:19:14 AM Miscellaneous Report 10/11/2012 4:06:16 PM Theft - Report Only Report 10/11/2012 5:12:10 PM Burglary Dwing - Report Report 10/26/2012 12:14:00 AM Theft - Report Only Advised 12/14/2012 8:30:17 PM Assist Fire Personnel No Service 2/19/2013 10:28:41 PM Theft - Report Only Report 3/9/2013 11:17:34 PM Loud Party Advised 5/26/2013 12:30:44i PM. Property Damage Accident Report 6/22/2013 10:45:02 PM -Miscellaneous Advised 6/2212013 1125:49 PM Silent Alarm False 8/142013 7:07:00 PM Miscellaneous 8/20/2013 10:23:03 AM.. Suspicious Person Booking 1- 1/21/2013 6:20:21 PM Property Damage/Hit & Run Report 11/23/2013 11:17:36 AM Domestic Advised 3/10/2014 10:0659 AM Burglary Biz - In Progress Report 3/10/2014 9:05:08 PM Unknown Trouble All OK 3/16/2014 5:17:36 PM Holdup Alarm False 4/5/2014 7:58:30 PM Panic Alarm False 4/7/2014 4:34:51 AM Suspicious Vehicle Gone on Arrival 6/24/2014 2:04:55 PM Theft - Report Only Report Run date: 6/27/2014 Call count: 24 Case # Apt. /Flr. 12- 203830 203 12- 255256 201 12- 263069 311 12- 275210 10 12- 295955 12- 320989 311 12- 321046 12- 336662 207 12- 383418 304 13- 049102 309 13- 070000 13- 163491 137198572 203 13- 198647 13- 265854 201 13- 272825 13- 388407 13- 390595 306 14- 076091 14- 076869 303 14- 084227 14- 109113 14- 110763 14- 215898 Page 1 of I Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3.000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6 /26/2014 Pct 4 ADDRESS: 1808 EMERSON AV N Date /time 7/17/26121:52:08 AM 8/29/2012 6:21:47 PM ` 12/6/2012 9:36:21 PM 6/8/2013 5:41:41 PM 6/17/2013 12:05:14 PM 7/15/2013 7:56:02 PM, 7116/2013 8:43:07 AM 7/16/2013 10:11:48 AM 8/29/2013 4:01:10 PM 11/5/2013 10:53:02 AM- 11/27/2013 11:34:38 AM 12/28/2013 10:37:46 PM 1/30/2014 8:39:27 PM 2/3/201411:21:25 AM 3/27/2014 3:39:40 PM 5/5/2014 2:21:42 PM 5/22/2014 4:54:29 PM 6/4/2014 7:20:37 PM Problem Audible Business Alarm Audible Business Alarm Suspicious Person Audible Business Alarm Disturbance Retrieve Prop/Dom Situation Emotionally Disturb Person Emotionally Disturb Person Assault in Progress Miscellaneous Assault in Progress Audible Business Alarm Audible Business Alarm Suspicious Vehicle Unknown Trouble Miscellaneous Assault in Progress Audible Business Alarm Run date: 6/27/2014 Call count: 18 Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. False 12- 221250 False 12- 273465 Assist 12- 376148 All OK 13- 179821 13- 190880 13- 227495 No Service 13- 228072 All OK 13- 228156 Gone on Arrival 13- 284320 Advised 13- 368559 Gone on Arrival 13- 395205 Secured 13- 429196 All OK 14- 031742 . All OK 14-035861 All OK 14- 097576 Information 14- 147336 Gone on Arrival 14- 169788 False 14- 188417 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic. Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6/27/2014 Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Call count: 92 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 1926 3 AV S Date/time Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. 6/26/20121:37:29 AM Domestic Report 12496272 26 7/1/2012 10:19:37 AM Burglary Dwing In Progress Report 12- 202763 1 7/8/201212:05:14 PM Check the Welfare 12- 211045 8/17/2012 2:25:22 PM Person with a Weapon Booking 12- 259353 25 8/18/2012 12:46:42 AM Disturbance All OK 12- 260153 3 8/22/201210:10:57 PM Disturbance Cancel 12- 265580 9/10/2012 5:35:32 PM Disturbance All Quiet 12- 287600 3 9/16/2012 4:30:47 AM Poss Personal Injury Acc Assist . 12- 294083 9118/2012 2:44:06 PM Unknown Trouble Unfounded 12- 296356 10/9/2012 12 :32:14 PM Domestic Advised 12- 318564 10/9/2012 10:37:23 PM Down Outside -One Transport 12- 319144 10/14/2012 3:04:42 PM Unknown Trouble Assist 12- 324270 10 /15/2012 7:50:08 PM Threats Advised 12- 325408 1 10/17/2012.9:37:17 PM Poss Personal Injury Acc Cancel 12- 327699 10/29/2012 2:58:23 AM Burglary Dwing - Report Report 12- 339703 1 I0/29/2012 6 :52:33 AM Recover Property . Information 12- 339740 1 11/15/2012 11:15:06 AM Domestic Report 12- 355935 22 12/5%1012 7:19:49 PM Unknown Trouble No Service 12- 375014 25 12/9/2012.8:07:54 AM Trespass in Boarded Dwell No Service 12- 378598 4 12/22/2012 5:17:54 PM Domestic Information 12- 390826 4 12/22/2012 8:09:27 PM Domestic Abuse Report Only Information 12- 390929 4 1222/2012 9:18:17 PM Unknown Trouble Booking 12- 390985 4 1/132013 4:51:20 PM Disturbance All OK 13- 011772 1/172013 1:15:42 PM Disturbance Advised 13- 015399 21 1252013 7:22:15 PM Domestic Abuse -In Progress No Service 13- 023257 6 127/2013 11:53:37 AM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Booking 13- 025062 6 1/27/2013 5:49:48 PM Disturbance Unfounded 13- 025254 25 1/302013 3:56:12 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Assist. 13- 028077 21 222013 3:10:33 AM Damage Property-In Progress Gone on Arrival 13- 030753 22/2013 12:36:19 PM Burglary Dwing - Report Report 13- 031008 5 2/162013 7:43:03 PM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Advised 13- 045775 3 2/172013 8:04:30 PM Suspicious Person All OK 13- 046837 2202013 10:51:34 PM Domestic Abuse-In Progress Report 13- 050288 6 2212013 7:35:42 PM Disturbance Advised 13- 051261 21 2/232013 12:31:08 PM Domestic Sent 13- 053116 3 2232013 7:40:24 PM Disturbance Advised 13- 053551 21 2/242013 12:27:22 AM Fight Advised 13- 053863 21 2272013 10:37:12 AM Tenant Trouble Information 13- 057441 21 Page 1 of 3 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 1926 3 AV S Date/time 3/1/2013 10:49:49 PM 3/3/2013 2:56:08 AM 3/,8/20131:16:05 PM 3%12/2013 5:23:18 PM 3/17/2013 4:16:37 AM 3/2012013 5:28:20 PM 3/21/2013 2:31:15 PM 3/22/2013 4:22:58 PM 3/22/2013 9:49:15 PM 3/25/2013 5:15:06 PM 414/2013 5:53:42 PM 4/4/2013 9:36:41 PM 4/10/2013 1:22:18 PM 4/10/2013 3:19:58 PM, 5/1/2013 2:25:54 Pk 5/16/2013 12:51:47 PM 5/18/2013 10:58:03 PM 5/242013 1:38:52 PM 6/19/2013 6:10:31 PM 6/212013 9:13:57 PM 6/212013 9:41:52 PM 6252013 6:06:42 PM 6/252013 6:48:05 PM 6292013 10:02:09 PM 6/30/2013 8:21:31 AM 7/12013 4:12:46 AM 7/62013 5:35:11 PM 7/122013 7:48:36 PM 7/132013 2:12:32 AM 7/13/2013 10:07:56 PM 7/182013.6:55:25 AM V M013'3:39:51 PM 8/8/2013 9:02:08 PM 8/222013 2:29:39 AM 10%9/2013 12:49:16 AM 10/15 /2013 9:18:49 PM 10/18 /2013 12:09:41 AM 11/6/2013 2:41:42 PM 11 /27 /2013 1:46:33 PM 12/122013 11:56:03 AM 12272013 10:14:34 AM 2/42014 9:29:30 AM 220201410:35:28 PM 2211/2014 11:44:04 PM 222/2014 12:08:23 AM 3/13/2014 9:04:40 AM 3/13/2014 6:30:08 PM 3/16 /2014 3:14 :47 PM 3/16/2014 5:40:58 PM Problem Suspicious Person Disturbance Disturbance Neighbor Trouble Music -Loud Check the Welfare Disturbance Neighbor.Trouble Disturbance Check the Welfare Check the Welfare Check the Welfare Unwanted Person Unwanted Person Emotionally Disturb Person Domestic Unwanted Person Unwanted Person Domestic Disturbance Unwanted Person Domestic Domestic Assist Fire Personnel Retrieve Prop/Dom Situation Property Damage/Hit & Run Domestic Unwanted Person Domestic Domestic Down Outside -One Domestic Abuse -In Progress Unwanted Person Theft Disturbance Assault in Progress Check the Welfare Unknown Trouble Domestic Abuse -In Progress Retrieve Prop/Dom Situation Domestic Threats Assist EMS Personnel Unwanted Person Suspicious Person Check the Welfare Check the Welfare Suspicious Person Suspicious Person Disposition Gone on Arrival All Quiet Gone on Arrival Advised Advised Information Advised Advised Advised No Service Unfounded Unable to Locate Transport Detox Assist Sent No Service Sent Sent Advised Sent. Cancel Advised Assist No Service Sent Transport Gone on Arrival Transport All OK Booking Advised Gone on Arrival Assist Booking Unable to Locate No Service Report' All OK Information Assist Advised Advised Assist Information Gone on Arrival Assist Case # Apt./Fir. 13- 060780 13- 062315 31 13- 068198 3 13- 073030 M 13- 078735 3 13- 082336. 21 13- 083434 3 13- 084797 13- 085208 3 13- 088201 21 13- 100370 13- 100626 13- 107557 13- 107700 3 13- 132834 ,13- 150857 3 .13- 154071 3 13- 161134 3 13- 194015 3 13- 196973 3 13- 197027 3 13- 202115 3 13- 202166 13- 207650 3 13- 208201 3 13- 209248 32 13- 215949 3 13- 223753 3 13- 224251 13- 225248 3 13- 230844 13- 234007 3 13- 258482 03 or 104 13- 275180 13- 333994 13- 343223 13- 346027 3 13- 369898 202 13- 395300 31 13 -011747 13 427942 31 14- 036854 24 14- 055926 23 14 -057034 34 14-057064 14- 079859 34 14- 080424 22 14- 084137 2 14- 084255 Page 2 of 3 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 1926 3 AV S Date /time 3/16/201410:34:36 PM 3/17/2014 6:05:13 PM 3/19/201411:45:45 PM 4/10/2014 9:53:12:PM 4/2712014 11:22:37 PM Problem Dead Person Check the Welfare Fight Threats Check the Welfare Disposition Case # Apt./Flr. Report 14- 084553 All OK 14- 085418 22 Sent 14- 088114 3 Advised 14- 115938 24 All OK 14- 137935 SEMENT Page 3 of 3 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3.000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6127/2014 Date range- 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Call count: 19 Pct 1. ADDRESS: 1501 HAWTHORNE AV Date/time Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. 7/12/2012 6:17:18 PM Theft - Report Only Report 12- 216117 7/13/2012 3:27:59 PM Check the Welfare Gone on Arrival 12- 217185 101 7/13/2012 7:51:10 PM Check the Welfare All OK 12- 217433 101 7/16/2012 6:01:06 PM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Advised 12- 220771 3/9/2013 2:01:39 AM Suspicious Person No Service 13- 069026 6/10/2013 2:07:08 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Assist 13- 181895 200 6/22/2013 3:52:27 PM Disturbance Gone on Arrival 13- 198028 7/19/2013 2:07:33 PM Recover Property Report 13- 232601 3 . 9/22/2013 5:35:17 PM Attempted Suicide Assist 13- 313616 10/11/2013 12:29:44 PM Domestic Abuse -In Progress Assist _ 13- 337412 12/2/2013 2:49:10 PM Assist EMS Personnel All OK 13- 400910 104 1/1/201411:32:41 PM Check the Welfare No Service 14- 001186 2/10/2014 11:41:19 AM Property Damage Accident Cancel 14- 044080 4112/2014 2:48:48 AM Prowler All OK 14- 117826 4/25/201410:13:33 AM Unwanted Person 14- 134515 200 4/29/2014 7:48:15 PM Mysterious Disappearance Report 14- 139871 5/14/2014 5:11:43 PM Attempted Suicide Assist 14- 159344 5/15/201412:37:00 PM Down Outside -One Assist 14- 160352 5/29/2014 7:30:21 AM Unknown Trouble Advised 14- 179258 200 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department' Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Miuneapolis,'MN 55406 (612) 673 - 3082. CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6/27/2014 Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Call count: 16 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 1920 LASALLE AV Date /time Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. 12/13/2012 6:44:25 PM Sound of Shots Fired Assist 12- 382257 1/7/2013 11:15:55 PM Threats Advised 13- 006539, 1/31/2013 7:14:26 PM Threats Advised 13- 029345 205 3/9/2013 11:13:24 AM Property . Damage Accident Report 13- 069312 5125/2013 9:37:49 PM Sound of Shots Fired Cancel 13- 162815 6/16/2013 10:52:12 PM Fight Booking 13- 190401 201 6/19/20I3 12:38:40 AM Check the Welfare All OK 13- 193116 107 7/8/2013 12:25:44 PM Walk Through a Building Information 13- 217865 11/2/20i3 11:58:09 PM Disturbance Gone on Arrival 13- 365755 11/4/2013 6:15:14 PM Music -Loud Advised 13- 367736 11/15/2013 1:31:29 PM Dead Person Report 13- 380751 11/16/2013 10:22:23 AM Miscellaneous Information 13- 381925 11/27/201311:17:11 AM Check the Welfare All OK 13- 395185 307 3/20!2014 5:41:28 PM Threats Report 14- 088864 5110014 3:34:10 PM Check the Welfare All OK 14- 164495 Page 1 of 1 Ainneapolis Police Department Strategic Information. Crime Management Division 3000 Minneliaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612)673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Date range: 6/25/2012 through•6 /2612014.... Yet 5 ADDRESS: 3710 NICOLLET AV Date /time 7/25/2012 12:00:59 PM 8/14/2012 9:16:35 PM 8/29/201210:16:57 AM 8/29/2012 11:06:01 AM 8/29/1012 12:52 :48 PM 9/8/2012 3:45:51 AM 10/15/2012.6:32:12 PM 12/6/2012 12:32:00 AM 12/9/2012 5:33:43 PM 12/9/2012 5:34:39 PM .12/10/2012 12:24:32 PM 1/27/2013 1:40:00 AM 2116/2013 7:23:17 PM 3/2/2013 9:18:54 AM 3/4/2013 3:51:51 PM 3/7/2013 10:41:16 PM 4/2/2013 2:59:51 PM 4/10/2013 6:37:51 PM 5/26/2013 12:36:31 AM 8%8/2013 6:58:32 PM 10/1/2013 5:54:36 PM 10/3/2013 1:04:02 AM 12/10/2013 1:11:17 PM 12/21/2013 9:30:00 PM 12/29/2013 2:21:08 AM 12/29/2013 3:01:13 AM 1/31/20141:01:04 PM 2/3/2014 7:24:52 AM 2/17/2014 4:56:45 AM 2/17/2014 5 ;04:06AM 3/112014 2:27:04 PM 3/72014 2:46:29 AM 4/5/1014 11:38:18 PM 4/82014 10:59:53 PM 4/9201410:41:51 PM 4/11/2014 7:47:36 PM 4/152014 3:38:46 AM 4/172014 2:30:46 PM Problem Domestic Assault Report Only Miscell aneous Attempt Pick-Up Suspicious Person Damage Property-In Progress Domestic . Suspicious Person Unknown Trouble Domestic Abuse Report Only Domestic Abuse -In Progress Assault in Progress Domestic Abuse -In Progress Miscellaneous Suspicious Vehicle Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Neighbor Trouble Fight Domestic Abuse -In Progress Assault in Progress Burglary Biz - In Progress Domestic Customer Trouble Person with a Gun Suspicious Vehicle Tenant Trouble Unwanted Person Unwanted Person Unwanted Person Domestic Assault 6port Only Domestic Abuse -In Progress Domestic Abuse Report Only Domestic Theft - Report Only Domestic Property Damage/Hit & Run Disposition Advised Cancel Inservice Cancel Information Advised Sent Cancel Report Advised Transport Refused Advised Information Report Advised Assist Assist Advised False Sent Report Assist Report Sent Gone on Arrival Sent Gone on Arrival Report , Refused Information Advised Report All OK Gone on Arrival Run date: 6 /27/2014 Call count:145 Case # Apt./Flr. 12- 231081 320 12- 255927 219 12- 272944 12- 272991' 12- 273107 12- 284956 12- 325346 205 12- 375275 12- 378890 12- 378892 205 12- 379415 205 13- 024788 13- 045750 13- 061258 13- 063679 13- 067593 13- 097543 13- 107906 302 13- 163037 13- 258355 304 13- 324359 207 13- 326182 13- 409692 211 13- 422822 13 -430014 13- 430045 14- 032484 312 14- 035703 14- 051938. 14- 051940 14- 065652 306 14- 072326 14- 109432 308 14- 11319.1 306 14- 114559 14- 117235 310 14- 121441 306 14- 124563 Page 1 of 2 Case # Apt./Fir. 14-1j,0064 202 14- 140052 14-15.6347 14-173728 14-196827 213 14-202553 'Page 2 of 2 Pet 5 ADDRESS: 3710 NICOLLET AV Date/time Problem Disposition 4t21/2014 7:58:17 PM Assault in Progress -��2 Gone on Arrival 4/.22/2014 5:58:41 PM Theft Advised 4/29/12014 10:21:05 PM Fight Gone on Arrival 5/12/201410 :44:02 AM Damage Property-Rpt Only Report 5/25/2014 3:29:21 AM Unknown Trouble Sent 6/10/2014 9:36:33 PM Recover Property Assist 6/14/2014 10:13:24 PM Disturbance All OK Case # Apt./Fir. 14-1j,0064 202 14- 140052 14-15.6347 14-173728 14-196827 213 14-202553 'Page 2 of 2 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic' Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6/27/2014 Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/20014 Call count: 8 Pct 5 ADDRESS: 2216 CLINTON AV Date /time Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. 11/25/2012 3:05:42 AM Theft Assist 12- 365019 2/3/2013 4:39:09 PM Property Damage/Hit & Run Gone on Arrival 13- 032122 4 8/20/2013 3:39:23 AM Domestic with Weapons Advised 13- 272589 4 8/20/2013 9:01 :49 PM Domestic Advised 13- 273550 4 121412013 7:43:37 AM Damage Property -Rpt Only Report 13AO2890 4/13/2014 4:56:25 PM Domestic with Weapons Advised 14 -1 19632 5DVU2 4/18/2014 4:34:00 PM Assault in Progress Advised 14- 126068 2 5/13/2014 3:28:08 PM Retrieve Prop/Dom-Situation Assist 14- 157984 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Cringe Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, NN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6/27/2014 Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 can count: 15 Pct -5 ADDRESS: 2220 CLINTON AV Date /time Problem Disposition 8/15/2012 11:25:37 AM ' Traffic Law Enforcement Tagged 9/17/2012 4:5827 PM Property Damage/11it & Run Report 9/18/2012 11:28:36 AM Auto Theft Report 10/17/2012 9:19:08 PM Traffic Law Enforcement Advised 11/23/2012 7:25:45 AM Emotionally Disturb Person Transport 11/23/201210:34:03 AM Domestic Advised I U23/201211:14:00 PM. Domestic No Service 11/24/2012 2:23:12 AM Unknown Trouble Transport 1 V24/2012 2:21:55 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Advised 8/13/2013 9:28:31 AM Auto Theft Report 12/4/2013 8:28:07 AM Damage Property -Rpt Only Report 1/25/201410:18:16 PM Down Outside -One w/Fire Transport 2/15/2014 10:22:48 PM Domestic Abuse Report Only Report 3/20/2014 7:51:54 PM Parking Problem Inservice 5/26/201411:14:58 PM Domestic Transport Case # Apt./Fir. 12- 256524 12- 295418 12- 296144 5 12- 327680 12- 363235 4 12- 363308 4 12- 363843 12- 364025 4 12- 364345 4 13- 263997 1 13- 402910 14- 026799 14- 050533 14- 089004 14- 175962 5 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Run date: 6/27/2014 Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Call count: 9 Pct 3 ADDRESS: 5360 RIVERVIEW RD Date/time Problem Disposition Case # Apt./Fir. 1/27/2013 10:53:42 PM Check the Welfare Cancel 13- 025436 3/28/2013 12:59:23 PM Check the Welfare No Service 13- 091610 9/25/2013 5:07:09 PM Check the Welfare 13- 316932 208 1219/2013 8:38:52 PM Emotionally Disturb Person Report 131309023 313 12/30/2013 8:48:20 PM Suspicious Person Unable to Locate 13- 431623 206 2/12/2014 8:37:30 PM Neighbor Trouble Advised 14- 046820 4/13/2014 10:13:18 AM Domestic Advised 14- 119350 107 5/8/2014 3:43:07 PM Check the Welfare Advised 14- 151462 315 5/21/2014 9:22:01 PM Check the Welfare All OK 14- 168791 208 Page 1 of 1 Minneapolis Police Department Strategic Information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 673 -3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT Date range: 6/25/2012 through 6/26/2014 Pct 3 ADDRESS: 3806 3 AV S Date /time 5/22/2013 10:45:56 PM 6/17/2013 9:59:02 AM 11/2812013 1:02:49 PM 6/12/2014 11:54:20 AM 6/12/2014 11:54:56 AM 6/20/2014 4:31:23 PM Problem Disturbance Domestic Abuse Report Only Domestic Domestic Abuse -In Progress Domestic Abuse -In Progress Check the Welfare Disposition Gone on Arrival Report Advised Advised Cancel All OK Run date: 6/27/2014 Call count: 6 Case # Apt./Flr. 13- 158916 B 13- 190784 A 13- 396396 B 14- 198960 B 14- 198962 B 14- 210517 B Page 1 of 1 Jackie H®ogenakker From: Stephanie Christensen <chris402 @umn.edu> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 3:34. PM 'To, Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Opposition of Rezoning 3330 W. 66th Street, Edina Dear Members of the Edina City Council: I am writing in response to the news of a potential "temporary" youth housing that is being proposed in the neighborhood that I have lived in since 2006. I am opposed to this initiative as I feel that the targeted population is unstable. I am sad that many of these teenagers did not have the same upbringing that I had and that some of them are plagued with mental illness. I feel that although this sounds like a great proposition in theory; I think that we all need to realize that sociology studies have shown that many individuals like this, unfortunately, find refuge in reverting back to what they were accustomed to. I think that there will be an increase in crime in this area. When I initially moved here, I spoke with an Edina police officer who informed me that this is a safe neighborhood as the only calls they needed to respond to were medical in nature. I suspect, in contrast, these statistics will change rather quickly due to the vulnerability of these individuals in bringing drugs, violence, and other mechanisms that helped them with survival. Our current neighborhood demographics consist of a high percentage of people who are ages 55 +. Many of these people have set routines and are comfortable with walking freely in the neighborhood for exercise OR with either taking the bus, walking to complete their errands, or getting to their car without having a concern of FEAR. My husband and I are much younger and enjoy the liberty of knowing that we live in one of the safest neighborhoods in the Twin Cities. I disagree with the proposition that has been made that these teenagers will be able to get a job quickly, and to make assumptions that the vendors at Southdale Shopping Center will be able to have positions. Most companies, large and small, require background checks and references. Most entry level jobs have a high turnover rate; thus, will this population who will be potentially living independently be able to keep a steady job? I appreciate your time with reading my opposition to this proposed temporary teenage youth housing project. I '4ope that you will take these factors into consideration in making this critical decision. Now is the time to Ireason with judgment; as, unfortunately, if this comes to fruition, it will not be as easy to reverse -the actions made. Regards, Stephanie C. Batt, MBA Memo: Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN To whom it may concern: I would like to voice my opinion opposing this project at the above stated address. While it is tragic that these young adults. have experienced, homelessness, I believe that in moving forward with this project we are allowing a group of high risk individuals closer into our community. These people through the experiences that they have had are more likely to have been exposed to drugs, alcohol, and crime as a means to survive. I am not naive'enough to believe that we don't have any of those things in this community, but now we are going to build a house to hold individuals who are more likely to turn to those options in the event that life doesn't not turn out how they would expect it to for them. Also these individuals are more likely to have been abused or have mental health problems which is also something that they would pass on to another individual given the wrong opportunity. Life on the streets is definitely something that I would not wish upon anyone, but they have experienced this and cannot have gotten through this unscathed. There are bound to be repercussions pertaining to the mental stability of these individuals, which can in turn bring about a negative impact on our community. In summation, l am not in support of this project as I believe that the risks for bringing these individuals into our community are too high of a price to pay. While a certain percentage of them are bound to make it and be assets to the community, I believe that too many of them will turn to the things that helped them survive life on the streets as a means to overcome current hardships because it is the thing that they know the best and would be the easiest option for them to get through something that is frustrating them. Regards, Chris Batt 6400 York Ave S #204 Edina, MN 55435 �Ix tackle Hoogenakker From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 8:21 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: I support 66 West Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952- 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I Cell 952 - 826 -0236 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 7' cteaaue(DEdinaMN:gov I www.EtlinaMN.Qov /Planninn ...For Living, Learning,:,RWi ing Families & Doing Business From: Nick Pearce [mailto:nickjp6Ca@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 11:13 AM To: Edina IMail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague@edinarealty.com; swensonannl@gmail.com Cc: Cary Teague Subject: I support 66 West Hello - I am writing to indicate my FULL SUPPORT of the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative "66 West" project in Edina. Providing housing to homeless youth is of critical importance in our community. Beyond the moral imperative, there are great benefits to be reaped by helping disadvantaged young citizens become productive members of our society. And, as your research on the matter has certainly shown, the perceived negative aspects of this kind of project, such as an increase in crime, seldom become a reality. In fact, crime will often go down as the stress of homelessness that can lead to crime has been mitigated. I hope you all will vote in favor of this project should it reach the city council. Best Regards and thank you for your dedication to the City of Edina! Nick and Sara Pearce 4367 Thielen Avenue Edina, MN 55436 1 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Amy Tuchenhagen <amythagen @netscape.net> Sent: Monday, August 11, 20141:59 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Beacon Interfaith Housing project Hello, I have a question for the planning commission regarding the Beacon project on 66th St. I support this project as it seems there are good guidelines in place to make it successful. ,My question is what happens when and if the Beacon project vacates this building at some point down the line. 1Nill it still be zoned for a similar group to move in? What guidelines will be in place to be sure another responsible group takes over, and not a group with less stringent guidelines and support? My husband and I are nearby residential property owners and we are concerned about this. Thank you,' Amy Tuchenhagen home: 952- 932 -7292 cell: 612-4184359 1 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Cary Teague Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 8:19 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW:.homeless housing Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952- 826 -03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteague @EdinaMN.pov www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dede Darling fmailto:dxbell @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 201410:49 PM To; Cary Teague Subject: homeless housing I am strongly not in favor of this project. How many Edina homeless youths will this proposed project house and who is paying the 10 million after some churches have paid in a meager $80,000 Dede Darling Jackie Hoogenakker From: Mary Hogan <maryh0074 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:03 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Housing project To whom it may concern, I am opposed to the development of the TCF property into a housing unit for the young and homeless. I live just a block and a half away in a Colony townhouse. I often walk and bike that road many times a week. This has always been a quiet complex and I feel very safe here. I feel this project could not only bring more car traffic, but also young, troubled adults walking the area. A four story building does not fit well in that space. Please vote this project down. Concerned resident, Mary Hogan Mary Hogan Sent from my Wad 1 - S- 1- G�►�..��L =- - -- - -- - - - -- - - OZOPA ti olo�Q�� , t 6 -�� `� V� ON6 i� a�c� August 10, 2014 Edina City Council 4801 W. 5oth Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Friends, I heartily support the 66,West project to provide housing and services to homeless youth, In fact, I'm startled and ,a little embarrassed to learn of mean - spirited opposition to such a transparently worthy undertaking, While I'm at it, I urge you to consider mandating a percentage of new housing. developments as "affordable," Other places do it to achieve both diversity .'and equity, So should we, (Please correct me if that's, already being done. But news reports concerning. the several large;developments'near Southdale and Byerly's don't mention such set - ,asides And it's obviously not a policy.being implemented ;just down the block from me, between.MornIngside. Read and Lyt.tel Street, where -one large structure is. soon to be-replaced by seven architect - designed, "high- end" homes,) best ishe , Sainford an 4400 Morningside Rd Edina, MN 55.416 952 925 -5738 cc Edina P-lannir-A Commission SUNDAY, AUGUST 10, 2014 • STAR TRIBUNE • METRO o B3 Edina Biel S homeless S oust The $10 million project for 9 at -risk youths has generated hundreds of e- mails, letters. $y BELLY SMITH kellysmith@a starWbune.com Plans for homeless youth apart- ments in Edina are pitting churches and hundreds of parishioners against some businesses and resi- dents who think"the project isn't the right fit for the Southdale area and could increase crime in the suburb. On Wednesday hundreds ofsup- porters and opponents are expected to pack the city's Planning Commis- sion to discuss the $10 million proj- ect called 66 West. It would be the first apartment building for home- less youths in the western suburbs, estimated to number about 250. "I'm confident we have the right project intherightplace," saidAnne Mavity, directorofnewprojects for Beacon Interfaith Housing Collab- orative, the St. Paul organization behind the project. ' We think this project is ready to go." For the past two years, local churches have been working with Beacon Interfaith to convert a TCF Bank building off W. 66th Street into the 39 -unit apartment building, which would have space for coun- selors to help homeless youths fm- ish school and find jobs. In July, more than 170 supporters rallied for the project outside City Hallbefore aPlanning commission meeting. But the project was tabled . to give businesses and community members more notice. On Wednes- day, the Planning Commission is expected to vote on rezoning and changing the city's comprehensive planto allowthe building— the first formal step in a lengthy process. Community Development Direc- tor CaryTeague saidthe cityrecom- mends support for 66 West, citing a Beacon project in Minneapolis that is "well-done and well- run:' Plus, he said, one of Edina's goals is to . vide more affordable housing. So far, city leaders have gotten hundreds of letters and a -mails on the project, mostly .in support. But a nearby business told the city it's concerned that Beacon's two-story building isn't the right fit for the dense commercial and medi- cal area of Southdale, which allows for buildings as tall as 12 stories. Sev- IF YOU 00 What: Edina Planning Commission When: 7 p m Wednesday Where: City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina eral residents said they were con- cerned that the building didn't fit in that area of Edina and that bringing homeless youth to the community could increase crime and illegal drugs while decreasing homeown- ers' property values. While Mavity said she under- stands the concerns, she said the building will help homeless youths, which increased in Hen- nepin County suburbs by 27 per- cent between 2005 and 2011. The estimate of 250 homeless youths counts those in the Bloomington - Richfleld -Edina area.:. "There's not a lot of affordable housing in Edina,. so .there's not experience :with this,'.' she said. "But it's a ' Positive . contribution to the communityopposed to thefears and concerns that may rise in peo- ple's minds;' After two years of Planning and looking at many other sites, Mavity said the bank building, at 3330 W. 66th St., is the perfect location for the apartments because it's across the street from a Metro 'I'ramsit bus stop and is in the midst of many nearby entry-level jobs that could provide employment. Beacon would expand the build- ing for 39 studio apartments, each between 355 and 456 square feet. It would also have offices, a com- munity area for residents, a fitness room, a computer lab and laundry. Edina Community Lutheran Churchhas committed $80,000 and considerable staff and pariShioner time toward the $10 million project. Several other churches in Richfield and Edina are also supporting it. "It's really powerful to watch the community come together," said Mavity, a member of the St. Louis Park City Council. "You rarely get that kind of passion in support of something." Ifthe Planning Commissionrec- ommends approval of the rezoning and comprehensive plan changes, the Plans are expected to go to the City Council for a vote next month. Kelly Smith • 612- 673 -4141 TWitter. @kellystryb ®� Edina C . Lutheran Church 4113 West Fifty - Fourth Street, Edina, Minnesota 55,424 -1432 Phone: 952.926.3808 o Fax: 952.920.4418 o www.ecic.org August 11, 2014 My name is Lauren Morse - Wendt, I live in St. Paul, but I am a Diaconal Minister serving Edina Community Lutheran Church at 4113 W. 54th Street in Edina. Over the past 3 years, our congregation has passionately delved into hearing the stories of youth experiencing homelessness in our community. I'd like to take a moment to give you a snapshot of the reality of youth homelessness in our neighborhood. This is the story of "Joe ": he is a conglomeration of dozens of stories we've heard. Joe is an 18 year old who grew up in Edina. His parents are divorced and he grew up with his mom, who struggled with chemical dependency. Joe made his way through high school, but around the time of graduation his mom said it was time. for her to find a new place. Joe felt that it would be healthiest for him to not follow her; and instead chose to stay in the community that he knew best with friends nearby. He knew he couldn't afford Edina apartments with his part time deli job, so he began staying with friends for two weeks at a time. He could always tell when their parents were ready for him to move on. When fall arrived, his friends began leaving for college and he knew he was a bigger burden on those family's homes. He started to spend more nights on metro buses. He was afraid of the overcrowded.downtown shelters for adults with real street experience. As classes began at Normandale Community College, he realized he had missed the deadline. He still planned to enroll, but didn't know how to apply for financial aid, get transportation to school, or get enough money for food now that he wasn't eating at friends' homes anymore. What Joe needed was a - supportive community to teach him these life skills and help him become a self - sufficient, stable adult who could thrive in the community he loved. What Joe needed, was 66 West. As our congregation has worked towards the dream of 66 West, we've shared stories like Joe's with thousands of people. We've given presentations to Edina faith communities, neighborhood associations, civic groups, senior clubs, the general public, schools, corporations, government leaders, and individuals who reside, work, or worship in Edina. The response, I am proud to say, has been overwhelmingly positive. You may know that the City Council has received over 400 emails or postcards supporting the building of 66 West on this site. We have been formally: endorsed by several faith communities as well as the Edina Challenge Initiative as a necessary and worthy project in our community. These letters and endorsements are just a fraction of the supporters in Edina who believe that affordable housing belongs here. I understand that some concerns have been voiced over whether this is the "highest and best use" for this site. I strongly believe that it is. If "highest and best use" is only a capital term, determined by how much property tax revenue is accrued ... then affordable housing will never, ever be the highest and best use for any site. However, if we consider the long term benefit of providing safe, stable housing for our youth who go on to be self - sufficient, successful adults, then it most certainly is. What better use for our land is there than transforming lives? Edina has long shown a commitment to considering far more factors than just revenue when considering highest and best use. After all, we wouldn't have the excellent parks, libraries, or schools already in our community if it were only about immediate revenue. I believe Edina will again make the long -term best choice by seeing the great benefit of affordable housing through 66 West. We in Edina have a chance to be regional leaders by choosing affordable housing as a highest and best use for our land. Thank you for your own deep commitment to the present and the future of our community and ask you to support the approval of buildinga home for Joe and so many others in our community., Sincerely, Lauren Morse -Wendt - *1W �1 Jackie Hoogernakker From: Kathy J. Dahl <kdahl @bestlaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 201411:52 AM To: Jackie'Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2014.008 - Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative I live at the Colony at Edina on Barrie Road. While I appreciate the altruistic attempts of organizations to help people, I do not support the proposed complex for homeless young adults and I do not believe it is in the best interest of my neighborhood to rezone the TCF Bank property to allow the building of a homeless shelter. I am very concerned that rezoning the area and putting in this shelter will adversely affect my propert y values, my ability to sell my property and adversely affect the security of my neighborhood. I therefore request that the Planning Commission not approve the rezoning of the TCF Bank property. Please put the well - being of the current residents and taxpayers of my neighborhood above the wants of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. Kathryn Dahl 6301 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hooaenakker From' Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:43 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Can I read a statement on Wed. 8/13/14 at 7 PM? Hi Jackie, Can you assist this person ?? Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ( 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 It `d Ibiunno(cDEdinaMN.-gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Gary Moses [mailto:garymari @ aol.com] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:28 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Can I read a statement on Wed. 8/13/14 at 7 PM? Thank you. I would like to read a statement at the hearing on Wednesday, August 13, 2014, at 7:00 pm Is there any possibility that this could happen? Thank you, Marilyn Peters - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Edina Mail <mail(cD_EdinaMN.gov> To: 'Gary Moses' <garvmari(cDaol.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 11, 201,4 10:13 am Subject: RE: I AM AGAINST Proposed Young Adult Apartment at 3330 W. 66th Street, Edina Dear Marilyn, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. have forwarded, your message to the Mayor Hovland. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoAEdinaMN.eov I www.EdinaMN.gov •. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &Doing Business From: Gary Moses fmailto:garymariaaol.coml Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 4:24 PM To: Edina Mail; ionibennett12(a)comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); ioshprague(a).edinarealty.com; swensonannl CcD-gmail.com Subject: I AM AGAINST Proposed Young Adult Apartment at 3330 W..6.6th Street, Edina 1 live in the neighborhood where there is a proposed " Young Adult Apartment " at 3330 W. 66th Street, Edina, MN. I AM TOTALLY AGAINST THIS PROPOSED APARTMENT! I am Legally Blind, and have felt safe walking in my neighborhood. I cannot drive, so I must walk. I have felt safe in the past. With the influx of new people. in the neighborhood_, I will feel more at risk. I bought a property in this neighborhood because it was safe. There is .a Montessori School right behind the proposed Young Adult Apartment. They say the Young Adult apartment will have Security Service, what about us? We don't have security service! This proposed Apartment will bring in young people from all walks and it is right across the street from Southdale. How convenient for shoplifting, grabbing purses, etc. The initial young adults will be very well screened BUT as time goes on rules -'often become relaxed. Whether these "Young. Adults" come from stable homes or are homeless. Many Young Adults are notmature enough to handle the.responsibility of saying NO to other Young Adults who bring in bad elements of life, such as, drugs, etc. We start with 39 Studio apartments, 39 people, and THEN some will invite in friends to stay with them and soon we have 50 people. Haven't we learned our lesson, too much of the same is just not a good thing. Look at low income housing projects in all cities. The people who propose this apartment DO NOT,live in the neighborhood! It they want an apartment building for young adults let them put it on the church grounds. "Edina Community Lutheran Church" at 4113 W. 54th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55424 The votes: 1. Marilyn Peters - AGAINST 2. Edina Community Lutheran Church & Beacon Interfaith Collaborative -- Support the proposed Young Adult Apartment (They rally many of their congregation but they should only count as ONE VOTE! a GROUP OF ONE.) Young Adults no matter what race, color, or creed, in a group together, can just spell trouble. Signed, Marilyn L. Peters (941) 840 -4034 2 Jackie Hoogenakker 'rom: Kevin Staunton <kevin @stauntonlaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 9:34 AM To: Cary Teague; Breanne Rothstein; Breanne Rothstein; Jackie Hoogenakker; Roger Knutson Subject: Re: Rezoning of TCF property at 66th street and Barrie Road We should double -check on when they actually were sent notice. On 8/13/14, 8:19 AM, "Cary Teague" <cteague @EdinaMN.eov> wrote: >Sent from my iPhone >Begin forwarded message: >From: Carol Jetzer < gm109 @aol.com<mailto:gm109 @aol.com>> >Date: August 12, 2014 at 9:37:01 PM CDT >To: <cteague EdinaMN. gov <mailto:cteague @EdinaMN.gov>> > Subject: Rezoning of TCF property at 66th street and Barrie Road >Dear Cary >I represent Occupational Medicine Consultants @ 6515 Barrie Road. >Attached to this email is a letter from their practice manager opposing >the current plan for rezoning of the TCF Bank property. They have >offered a suggestion for continuity of the medical campus zoning which >is addressed herein... Because they received no notification of this >issue until 5 August, they have not had time to develop a formal >proposal document. >We request a continuance /tabling of this project until all parties have >had the opportunity to present opinions and potential options. >Thank you >E Crayne 1 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE CONSULTANTS, LTD 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 T0: City of Edina August 11, 2014 Planning Commission RE: proposed rezoning of property @ 66th Street and Barrie Road, Edina Occupational Medicine Consultants has been in practice on Barrie Road since 1988. Our original office was in the 6500 Building. In;the.mid 1990s we contracted with Pine Hurst Properties to lease our present building at 6515 Barrie.' The building was at that time a vacant, empty shell. We planned and developed the building for our medical practice and the current tenant Nova Care Physical Therapy with build out expenses totaling around $350,000 for both units. 'Zoning was then.and.is currently for medical facilities /practices. We subsequently purchased'the building from Pine Hurst Properties for.$J' :56 million. Our tax base has steadily increased over the years,from an approximate $32,000 per year in 2000 to over $62,000 this year. This we are told is based upon the zoning requirements. We, as neighbors to TCF Bank were unaware that the building was for sale. We, until two weeks ago when we received a letter from the City Planning Committee were uninformed regarding the pending sale of the property and were unaware of the proposal for rezoning. With the significant investment in our property at 6515 Barrie and a stable patient base since 1988 would find it extremely'difficult to move. We cannot justify nor condone the proposed rezoning. An additional concern is parking as we must accommodate a specific number of parking spaces for our patients because Nova Care sees Medicare patients and there are specific requirements. We would propose that council would entertain continuing the present zoning and discuss with us a proposal to purchase the TCF Bank property and develop it into a Senior Citizen Day Care facility. Such a facility would be ideal for this location with proximity to a majority of Fairview physician groups, and supportive care such as Nova Care Physical Therapy, Fairview Oncology, Ophthalmology practices, dental,and skin care services all of which are 'Senior Citizen' issues. Family members could bring their senior to the facility en- route to work and pick them up at end of day. The facility would transport to medical appointments and return the Senior to the Day Care Center where they could rest, relax, play cards and have`peer and staff social interaction so vital to the health of the aging mind. Because we did not receive notification of the current proposal by the planning commission until two weeks ago, we have not had time to develop a formal plan /proposal for consideration. We would request the current housing plan be temporarily placed on hold to permit time for us to make a proper formal presentation to council. Thank you for your consideration. Carol R Jetzer RN Practice Manager Occupational Medicine Consultants, Ltd @ 6515 Barrie Road, Edina 612 - 327 -4926 ONC Occupational Medicine Consultants 6515 Barrie Rd Edina, MN 55434 Date Name Signature Address 1 g .19 f I� fb Hnua t�sr s rr, e gz X101 f-I N s ia5 2 'e 1(0 3 I � �to'F►��i , (N � J 4 1 �e.ihav E5�. L 5 0451 e rn 6 ftfNA Sd nti� i5`l vi CC LO 05 �d,h� �Mn; 5 8 9 qjZ1l 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Date Name Signature Address %Am rA &A -P ZIA,- or,? earru Minneapolis Police Department�� StFategic Information Crime Management D1v1s1on 3000 Minnehaha Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) -673 =3082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT BY BLO(:IC% / Run date: 5!23!2014 Date range:. 1/112012 through 5/22/2014 Call count: 170 Pct 5 3700 BLOCK OF NICOLLE"1' Date/time - Address - .Problem Disposition CaseP ApIJFlr. 7124/21112 5:5242 PM 3700 NICOLLE'I' AV °Miscellaneous Information 12.230241. 1126/3013 5:44:09 PM 3700 NICOI.I.F.T AV Walk Through a Building. All OK 13.02603 2/1212013 12:03`.35 PM 3700 NICULLET AV - On Site - 13.040705 3/1/2013 4:53:19 PM 3700 NICULLET AV Then :. Report - 13.060319 3/27/2013 9:13:41 AM 3700 NICOLLET AV Property Damage Accident Tagged 13.0901(.7 1 2/21201 3 4:57:00 AM 3700 NICULLET AV Burglary Business • Report Heport 13.400558 I:V2420I3 3'3U:64 AM 3700 NICULLET AV Check the Welfare - Repoli 13.425135 105 11l5/2014 8 :41:17 PM 3700 NIC'OLLLT AV Suspicious Person. Sent 14- 015532 2/621114 8:27:42 AM 3700 NICOLLLT AV Business Check , 14- 039096 . 21232014 4.10:49 PM 3700 NICULLET AV Parking Problem Inservice 14.058786 4/420136:09:IIAM 3701 NICOLLFT AV Check the Wclfuc 13- 100116 202 S/72oi 2 &S LOU AM - .1701 NICOLI.F.T AV - Burglary Giving In Progress Assist 12-137181 7/252012 12:02:52 AM 3701 NICOLI AT AV Suspicious Person . - Reprimand/Releasc 1.2.230676 20-0/2013 11:47:17 PM 3701 NICOLLE'l AV - Audible Business Alarm False 13- 050345 6/120119:09:16 AM 3701NICOL.LETAV property Damage Accident Advised - 13. 170533 1 +21)2013 747:32 PM 3706 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Vehicle Report 13-0'9239 1292013 7.48:12 YM 3700 NICOILET AV Suspicious' Person Report 1.3.02724U 7/102013 134,09 PM 3706 NICOI.IHr AV Suspicious Person Inrmination 13.220614 VU-1014 10:01:15 AM 3700 NICOLLIE f AV Property Damage/Hit & Run No Service 14 -019179 11 ^7.43 PM 3706 NICOLLET AV Suspicious Vehicle All OK 4- 084610 .3/16t7_014 12112012 153.51) PM 3710 NICOL IXT AV Neighbor Trouble Assist I2-D19887 320 1'232012 4:56:07 AM 3710 NICULLET AV Attempted Suieidc Report 12.0..1313 :05 2192U129.38:34.PM 3710NICOLL.E1'nV UnknovmTrouble Assist 12- 039478 3 /II /2U12c,18:11 PM 3710 NICOI.I.L "r AV Unknown Troub!e Booking 12 -071264 4/42012 2:12.41 AM 37 11) NICOLLET AV Suspicious Person - Booking 12-100047 4/4)70117:0:34 AM 3710 Nl( :OLLC'I' AV Check the Welfare information 12-100122 102 4/132012 4:56:10 PM 3710 NICOLI.I:I' AV Assault in Progress Advised 12-1 10'_7'_ i 5212012 1:18:30 AM 3710 LJICUI.I.F:1' AV Suspicious Person Report p 12. 153227 6/152 012 2:30:50 AM L 37 H) NICO LF.T AV Assault in Progress Report 12•.182996 300 725/2012 12:00:59 PM 3710 NICOLLF•T AV Domestic Advised I2- 231081 3_U 81142012' >' 16:35 PM ?710 NIC'L`I.LET AV Assaufi Report Only Cana:) 1 ^_•25592? 219 8(292U1zz 1016:57AM 3710N!C'OLLI.TAV Miscellarunlus Inscvicc 12-272944 8!292012 11:04.01 AM 3710NICOI.I.F:'rAV Attempt Pick -Up 12- 272991 8!19/2012 12:52:48 PM 3710 NIC'OI.I.F.T AV Suspicious Person Camxl 12. 273107 9/002012 3:45.51 AM 3710 NI('L`I.I.F.T AV Damage Propert)•-111 Progress Information 12- 284056 10115P-0126.32:12 PM 3710 NICOLLLT AV Domestic Advised 12. 325346 12- 375275 205 12/6/2013 12.3200 AM 3710 NI('OLLE'1' AV Suspicious Person Sent 1'--3788`''() 122192012 5:33:43 PM 3710 NIC'OLLET AV Unknovm Trouble Crurcel 12- 378%'72 . 205 i 1 2192012 S 34:,19 PM � 1710 NIC'OI.LL 1' AV Domestic Abu. Repun Only Report 12- 379415 205 I211(Y•412 13:2432 PM 37 10 NICULLET AV Domestic Abuse -In Progress Advised 1/272013 1:40:(1) AM 3710 NICULLET AV Assault in progress Transport 1.1- 024788 2/162013 7:23:17 PM 3710 NICOLLET AV Domestic Abuse -In Progress Refused I3- 045750 3)22013 9:18:54 AM 3710 NICOLLH.T AV Miscc!lanLous Advised 13- 061258 3 ;427)13 3:51:51 PM 37I0 NICOLI.F"r AV Suspicious Vehicle 13- 063679 3/72013 10:41 16 PM 3710 NiCOIJAT AV Miscellaneous Information 13-067593 _ -7 4/- '21201.1 _:S'):51 PM 3710 NICOLLUT AV Misccllaneous Report 13.097543 13- 107iH)G 302 � / 4/102013 6;37:51 PM 37I0 NICOLLHT AV NeighborTrouble Advised 13.163037 56/201-3 I :36:31 AM 3710 NICULLET AV Fight Assist 13.258155 304 ' + 6rxn_o13 nsa :3_ PM 37I0 NI(%)LLF1' AV Domestic Abusoln Progress Assist _ ° 10/12013 5:54:.16 PM 3710 NICULLET AV Assault in Progress 13- 324359. 207 - 10/32013 1-04:02 AM 1710 NIC'OLLET AV Hurglary Biz • In Progress False False I]- 32618'_ - 1- - 12 /I(l/!Ol.l 1.11.171'M 3710 PI IC'ULLIi'I' AV Domestic Sent I3- 409642 �� 21 I ' �2ri h....IP_U!.19:3U:W PM 3711) NIC OLLET AV Customer Trouble Report �� 13.4_-8__ 1?292U 13 2.21'08 AM 3710 NICOL LF f AV Person with a Gun Assist 13.410014 13- 130045 _ '2 < 1212 )/'U133:Di:I3 AM ?710 NWOLL Lrr AV Suspicious Vehicle Report 312 _ 1/.1112014 1:01:04 PM 1710 NI('Oi.LE'f AV Tenant Trouble 14- U32484 0 7 i AM /1201 a 7..4:5 37IU NICOI. CT AV Unwanted Pcrsun Sent 14- 035703 _ '!1720:4 4:56:45 AM 3710 NICOLLET AV Unwanted Person Gone c1) Arrival 19•DSI938 14- 051940 721172014 5'04:00 1)M 37I0 NICULLET AV Unveamcd Person Sent 19.11652152 306 i 3/12014 2`27:04 PM .1710 NIC'UI.I.FT AV Domestic Gone urt Arrival 2.46.29 AM 3710 NICOI.I.Irr AV Assault Report Only Report 14- 072326 3172014 4 /5201 a I 1 38:18 YM 3710 NICOLI.L•"1' AV Domestic Abusc-In Progress Refused 14409437 308 306 4/8/2014 10:59:53 PM 3710 NICOLI ET AV Domestic Abuse Report Only Information 14 -I 13191 It41:51 PM 2 k 37IU NIC'OIJ.E T AV Domestic Advised IA•114554 41)014 747.10 PM 3710 N1C'OLLIiT AV 'I'heR • Report Only Roper, 14- II)'`3S .110 4/112014 alU20W338.4GAM 37i0N1('OL.LI:I'AV Domestic All OK 14.1 ?1441 306 . 4%172014 2:30746 PM .1710 NICOUXT AV Proporty, Damage/11il & Run Gone urt Arrivul 14.124563 _ 371UN1('OLLL•'I'AV Assault inProgrea UuncunArrival 14-131064 4r12U147.58.17PM 4r-2/1-014 5.58.41 1`14 371(1NICOLLETAV ')'hell Advised 14- 1317_43 202 Page 1 nr3 Pct 5 3700 I31,OCIC OF NICO!.1.1: 1' Case AptJFlr. Uatdrin+e Address Problem Disposition Oone on Arrival 14. 140052 4/!9/_01410 :21:05 PM 3710NICOLIX,r AV F7gM Uamage Propeny-Rpt Only Report 14- 156347 5/12x2014 10'44:02 AM 3710 NICOLI.F T AV Unwanted Person Tagged 12.392650 11:39:36 AM 3711 NIC'OI.I.F.T AV Advised 12.237211 .J25nol2 > 8 /15!!013.8 37.011 I M 1714 NICi)I.I.LT AV Disturbance All OK 12.303089 924/2012 1 1 19:16 PM 3716 NIC'OLIET AV Suspicious Person P Property Uamants71it 8c Run Report 12- 153570 SP_ I n012 11'09.50 AM 3717 NICOLLCT AV Theft . Report O+dy Report 12- 340653 t 0/302(12 12:05.04 PM 3717 NICOLLCr AV Fight Transport 14.15322(7 0 5/9/_014 IU:37 _I PM 3717 N IC'OLLET AV Damage Ptupeny -In progress Gonc on An 13 181006 G/9n013 604:01 PM 3719 Nl <'ULLt: l' AV Hurgl. Owing Report pry 3' P Report 13.366!61) 111312011 113? 19 AM 3734 NIC'OLLLT AV Burglar Report 12- 054622 ?J34n012 8:05.12 PM 3725 NICOIAXIT AV Rcpon Burglary Owing -Re Report No 12 123119 OWN 424201_ 8'176.19 PM 3725 NIC01.1.IzT AV s Person Suspicious Person rmat o Infocmabon 12.734622 5/4n012 10.34:18 PM 3725 NICOLLCT AV Ahuse Report Only No Service 12.76 }849 5'30!2012 10:26'33 AM 3725 NIC'OLI.L -r AV Auto Theft Auto TheR No Service 12- 165132 5/31n012 1239:31 PM 3725 NICOLLCT AV 3725 NICOLL.F.T AV Burglary Owing- Report Report 12- 166699 611 1201? 8:75:58 PM 6!1201? 6.51 tR PM 3735 NIVO7.I.E'r AV Auto Theft Assisl Oumi on Arrival 12.1691'49 12.176092 LIPS 6NnUl1 I t.a7:29 AM 3725 NICOLLE'I' AV Unwanted Person Sent 11.2116 38 7/10n01_ 8:00:30 PM 3725 NICOL.LLT AV Customer Trouble Burglary Owing Ropun Rc rimond/Reicase P 12•'_19636 7;11/2012 4.00:49 PM 3725 N1C'OI.l. r AV 12- 225755 7n02012 6:59:07 PM 3725 NIC'OLLET AV Burglary Dwing. Report Booking 12- 251840 2 8/112012 1:51: 24 PM 3775 NICOLLCT AV Burglary Dwing In Progress Rrpon 12-1-51888 8/I 112012 2 47.51 PM 1725 NICOLLCT AV BuP3la y Dwing !n Progress No Service 11 :67:)00 SP012612 4.58:45 PM 3725 NICOI.I.CT AV Attempt Pick -UP Burglary Uwing In Progress All OK 12.263909 8n1/2012 1:51:5'_ Phi ,1725 N1COI.I.F.T AV Attempt PtcY,•llp Report 12 -264118 8 /2280 1= 8:09:13 AM 3725 NICOLL.Lr AV 72.267667 3/!412012 4'54.40 Pht 1725 NICOI.I.I,. r AV Theft Suspicious Vehicle Cancel Cancel 12.289389 7/Ip_2U12 11:(X):27 AM 3725 NI('OI.L.I :I' AV Attempt Pick -Ilp Gone on Arrival 12.3116915 9N8A0I2 5:41) 31 I'M 3775 NI('OLL.RT AV Burglary Uwing Iii Progress Gone on Arrival I2• 309003 'i/3Ul2UI2 10.07 31 AM ,7725 NICOI.t.ET AV Gonc on Arrival 12- 312888 1013/_[711 IU:34.36I'M 3725 NI('OLI.EI' AV -L' Prowler rmspass in Boarded Dwell Assn 12•}25351 10/152012 6:45:29 PM 3725 NICOl.LL• AV Burglary Biz - In Progress All OK 12.336234 IO n52012 3 33:24 PM 3725 NICOL.LET AV Cancel 14.153051 5192o148:5(:26PM 3725NICOLLVI'AV kid Trouble Gone onArrsv4l 14- 158117 5/13n014 5:10:27 PM 3725 NI(OLLL•T AV Disturbance t Report 12'190106 OWN 6/212012 9'01:40 AM 3726 NICOL.I.Er AV Threats Gone Arrival 13-251174 ON 8/3/2011 329:50 AM 1726 NICOI.I.F.T AV Unwanted Person Dama3c Properry -In Progress Report 13-251193 NUN 8/.3/201.7 4 47: ^_3 AM 3126 NICOLL.E'r AV Property Dainag&4it & Rut- Relwn 12.01F230 1/17n012 8 !3 01 AM 3 ?28 NIC'OLLL'T AV TheR - Report Only Report 12. 149026 5/17!2012 1'32 (W Pkt 3733 NIC'01AX'T AV Suspicious Person Sent 12- 167912 6 /1_01 _ 7.50'57 PM 3733 NICOW.ET AV Retrieve Prop'Dnm Situation Refused 17063539 3/4n012 6 39'25 PM 3716 Nl('OLLI :I' AV 12- 019994 1212UI2 351.54 FM 3740 NIC0I.I.F.T AV Theft Suspicious Vehicle 0� Towed 12-2 47990 8/8/2012 10:12.44 AM 3740 NICOLL.ET AV Suspicious Vehicle Sent 12. 261259 8(182012 10.53:41 1'M .7740 NICOLLCT AV Setrieveus Vehielr All OK 13. 1131425 ?/4n(f 17 1- 377:11 AM 3740 NICOL.I.F.T AV Pro Dimt Retrieve 1>' Advised 13.098761 � 4/32011 1-20:40 PM 3740 NI('ULLET AV. Building Walk lltrotigh n Building T 13.305549 Q-54:02 o (./21121713 >'S9:0_AM 3740 NIC'OLIXT AV Customer Trouble Advised Advised I1 -019113 ., v I _/14n013 _:41.25 PM 3740NIC'ULIxTAV Customer Trouble 13414208 I ?/1420134:06:15 PM 3740 NICOI.LLT AV Music -Loud A1lvised 12- 021175 12?2(711 10;58:53 PM 3743 NICOLI.LT AV Domestic Abuse Report Only Report 7 ?•)51467 3 ?I21n012 6 57,17 PM 3743 N ICOI.I.ET AV Burglary Report 1''- 176261 616. ^_01217:04'36 AM 3743 NICOLIXT AV Business Alarm Business Alum Rll 12-251562 8/1(12013 4:08:1^_ AM 3743 NICOIJ,tel' AV All O 13- 266781 1 8(212012 9:18:44 PM 3743 NICOLLI:I' AV Domestic Audible is e False 13- 185731 WI31201310:58:29AM 3743NICOI.I.F.TAV SuscBaVehicAlarm Suspicious Vehicle Advised 13- 138496 1:13 :_4 AM 3747 NICOI.I.Ef AV Robbery of Person Assist 13411454 1InW2013 1''120/3011 8:19.41 PM 7743 NICOI.LET AV ry Report 12 -0 8800)1 3, ^_SnUl2 2:2'):40 PM 3145 NICOL.LET AV Theft Damage PropenyRpt Only Repun I2- 101.180 4/512012 9.45:01 AM 3745 NICOLL ET AV Recover Property Report 14- 147024 5/51'_016 9:17.18 AM .1745 NI('OI.LF'r AV All UR 12- 111366 423207: 8:44:14 PM 3149 NICOI.I.I•: ' Av Unsecure liu)mess 'fa • •ed Tagged 17- 016139 4 ! /I8 /2o133•Ul•SoAM 3751NI('Ol.l.i*.rAV Assault inPrngress Theft - RsportOnly Report 13- 195(I(7) 6t2fu 2013 12-18:2-1 PM 3751NICOLI.C1'AV Cancel 12•W I I6. 1/I I /2UI? 5.06 19 PM 1756 NIC'OL.IAT AV Fight Unwanted Person Sent 12. 151988 5/1 9r-012 8'00.14 I'M 1756 NIC'OLLL"I' AV Walk Through a Budding All ()k 12.2176757 7/4,'2012 9.1 I:IC I'M 3756 NIC'UL.I.E r AV 12.25582.7 BIIxnUI_ 8'00:14 PM 3756 NIC'OLLL"I' AV Miscellaneous Advised 13.061408 1/ ; ^2011 12:x'/•11 PM 37S6 Nlc()I.I.LtT AV Suspicious Person Crone on Arrival 13.148561 n :1 5/14017 5:}00 PM 1756 NIC'OLIEr AV Unwanted Person Audible Business Alarm Cancel 13.211692 7/1n011 4:19:24 AM 3756 NICOI.I.ET AV Audible Business Alarm Report 13•248380 &'In017 4:49:52 AN! 7756 NI('0I.1.F'r AV 'I'hrcats Advised 73= 268291 811002013 3:50:4'_ PM 3756NICOLLG7 AV Rubbery of Biz In Progress Report 11. 409063 12/96(713 1:01 PM 1756 NIC'OLIX f AV Audible Business Alarm All Uk 13.416180 4 12/16/2UI3418'l11 PM 1756 NICOI.I.F.T AV Audible Dimness Alarm F'615e 1,1- 4I664h 1 ?11629! 3 8:13:56 PM 7756 NlC'Ul.1.E'I' AV Audible Business Alunn False 13.417089 12/176013 6:06 21 ANI 3736 NIC'OLLET AV Audible Business Alarm False 13.418.775 12/ t 860 136:25:16 AM 3756 N1('OL.L.I:I' AV Audible Btuineis Alum Assist 7 }.420461 1'_119 /_UI311:12'll I'M 3756NI('Ol.Li51'AV Page 2 01`3 7. =.:.(a c, x .,,...�s 1 ra r-!• °"' - "�" JT ,' f "� - 'f % : -c -^� n T dl y{ $ r. . - Lee Blons, execubve director.of Beacon nterfaith Housrng Colfaboratrve, addresses the cmwd ouis de EdrniCity hail, Wednesday, July 23, after, a;public;heanng for Beacon's proposed 6t West.prolect was t6led, by the Planning Commission due to.:a computer error. Edina Community Lutiierari Church is the lead cangrngation partnering Wb Beacon fo pro - vide aparimerrts fd young adults liih have experienced homelessness: (Subrniited photo) ten� H-,: U tall of to . t % Young adult s a io apa �tments, sup Commission meeting. , services and 24 -hour However, the Edina h US I rt Set security, : modeled ., aft er Planning Departmen[ re- r . Beacons r'.icollet Square nerved several complaints t.0 r,1�1u � . 3 building* in ' Minn eagvhs that pierties to the east 66 , V1%est wont be a drop- of a 6ti West property hearing in homeless „shelter; and didn't receive notice of residents �y�} w through the public hearing., " tch m, used o COM- illy I.kA @C an � application process, A gh do � ag 3? re a lease and pay rent purer : - . �egerate o pub c notice AEWSPAPE33,$ The site was chosen of ...t ter properties were-con caused some within 1,000. Supporters of 66 West: sidered in St. Louis Pazk, properties i Apartments rallied on the Edina and Bloomington:' feet of the 'site to. not steps of :Edina City Hzl} The sit was chosen based receive mailed notices last week .after .a coin- on its proximity to: jobs Planning Director Cary pater problem caiised.the and transit:.for residents, Teague told the P}annin0. project's public hearing to and. a _proposal was first Cariimission be postponed to Wednes- viewed by the Edina City The Planning, Depart- day, Aug 13. Council. in a sketch plan .ment typically hears com- 66 West is proposed to review in May. plaints from residents provide housing to south- The : Planning Coin that they didn't receive west suburban young mission was scheduled a public bearing notice, ; adults _who ha4e.;experi- toehold a public hearing but when.the cit3± checks enced namelessness, in a .Wednesday; July 23, on the list, the rodent did partnership between Edi- a Comprehensive Plan receive a notice : How Comm .:;ity Lutheran amendment and rezon- ever, this time, when they na Church and' Beacon 'In- mg request for the pro - checked the list, they . ,.. . terfaith Housing. Collab posed 66 West property, found addresses missing, orative which curren has an Teague told the Sun Cur- The proposed two- Hennepin TCF Bank build -. rent. The department had story. building at . 3330 in.- on the site. About. Hennepin County print a W 66th St. in Edina is 170 people attended BBB - TO PAGE 9 expected to include 34 the July 23 Planning Crime in the Colony &Towers area set to increase 418% How will that impact your safety and your property value? ASSAULTS, BURGLARY, PROPERTY DAMAGE, FIGHTS, ETC. A new housing project for teenagers and young adults experiencing homelessness is currently planned for the existing TCF Bank Building (red X). This project is being run by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. Currently the is no plan for 240 supervision of these teenagers. On average at the existing Minneapolis Beacon housing sites police visits average 14 visits per month. That's one police visit every other day. And we're not talking about minor offenses as Beacon would lead you to believe. Don't let this happen to your neighborhood, plan to attend the first public meeting. August 130 7Pry 6r 1N a- C hr L� !1 J If you cannot attend the meeting email your concerns to the Mayor and the City Council (email listed below) or call City Manager, Scott Neal at 952 - 927 -8866 to voice your concern. mail0DEdinaMN.eov ionibennettl2 @comcast.net mbrindleCcDcomcast.net a oshsoraeueCDedinarealty.com swensonannlCDgmail.com Make your voice heard! _ &E SEE aai-i i ousl Baring notice: not Mailed 'romm FAU 9 list of addresses that shouldhave received a public bearing notice.and "the magni,. tude of it was greatec.than we thought;" he said'. Due toa. that's taff.recommended the Planning Commission table the pub lip hearing,. The Plaruatng Commission could legal. „ly proceed .with; the hearing because the Styr made `a good faith effort" to mail the notices, but it'would:open up the city tct'challenges because the hearing wasn't properly noticed; he said. Planning ;Commission unam mousir approved postponing the pub-. hearing until .its:meeting. At 7 p.m. esday;. Aug. 13 at Edina City Hall,- If ffie Planning Commission takes action on'. the ,proposal, : it. will: likely be' on . the Edina :City Council's Sept .2 agenda. The. city: will' use Hennepin County.'s computer program . to mail , out notices until the program is.fixed :And'the city is comforldble.that there aren't any errors, Teague said. "We cannot apologize enough for the. oversight," Teague said at the meeting. Planning' Commission Chair Kevin Staunton also apologized, saying, 991' waist to start by saying I've expressed my disappointment to (Teague) as well as to the city manager. It strikes me as the kind of stuff that we at the city ought to do right, which is send out mailed notice for hearings like this." Given the unusual circumstances, the Rev. Eric Strand of Edina Community Lutheran Church was allowed to make a statement following the Planning Com- mission's decision. Strand said the au- dience would like to: speak, but under- stands the Planning Commission has a Process to follow. They're eager to return Aug. 13, he, said, thanking the commis- sion for considering the proposal, "The project is an opportunity for Edi- na to once again express its values and its commitment to each other and to the city and to the future we share together," hp cU;A JoAnne Knutson "of Good Samaritan United Methodist Church in Edina holds a sign with signatures of 66 West supporters in the rally Wednesday, July 23, at Edina City Hall. (Sub- mitted photo) let Square's urban aocation shouldn't be used for comparing _crime, but instead Lincoln Place in Eagan is comparable because it serves a population similar to that proposed at 66.WesL According to the letter, Eagan: police say the calls to Lincoln Place aren't different than the.calls expected from other apartment buildings. The Planning Commission was asked by Beacon to open the public bearing. and then continue it Aug. 13 to. allow audience members in attendance July 23 to speak on the matter. Planning Commissioner Claudia Carr The audience then gathered on city said people would beat a &-- age if .tail's steps`to hear about the project from they weren't in attendance at , my 23 66 West organizers .A 19- year -old Nicol- let Square resident also spoke about how meeting and didn't hear the projecvprew Potation. However, Commissioner Ar- the .housing has helped him, including lane Forrest pointed out that anyone can wateh the video of.the Planning Com- becoming the first iii'.Iiis family to attend eo]lege . mission's meeting. ` .The council has received. email-, letters, Staunton said he appreciated that peo- , ple wanted to speak inthepublic hearing,. petitions and postcards in support of the prcject'tn recent m ?ntbs from residents but that- everyone on both sides should And coingregations, L�rditta,,,�V(i g po_; b nalie `hs l�ichfield Bltidniiiigfon, Prat n1� fx►t rests affairness; a .. -Eden .. ne; Wayzata,. Minnetonka and St,. Louis' Park. want everyone hate," he,satd In making the: motion : to. table the However, concerns have also been public` hearing, :Planning Conunissioner Mike Platterer thanked 'everyone for: at- rdised regarding whether the building's residentswould cause public safety prob -, ' tending -the:. meeting. Iv was- "unfortu- lems in the area, with ,a nearby business nate" and he said he was only making the sending to,the council in June a list of Sl .motion because.it was the right thing to do since people weren't notified. police calls made .from Nicollet Square's address in a 21 -month period. ;: people. attending July23;.who can't at- ECLC task force metiiber Bernie Bea- tend theAug.13meeting can either email ver countered with a letter to the council_ their- statements to the city or have .their 3- minute statement read by someone else pointing out that police calls don't ind�- rate whether it involved:a Nicollet Square during the Aug.- 13:public hearing: , -resident and that the alleged crime may have occurred outside . the building with Contact Lisa . Karzke at lisa.kaezke@ ' Nicollet Square staff reporting. it to. po- ..@EdinaSunC'urrent ecm- incconr ;ar follow ; her an .; Twitter U& The letter also explains that Nicol- , .' New to Cleve,, ih '�a . New 9- N99eh . e! . NewTecicheiS.9- Clv�eov 1'rivat'e /Ghoup Music Classes):...- Pwd a irip +0 wor qi' a -- Disney World! rl ; ntion Perirvxx °lice - O�, L7r:a� HaA. W,4 T ol1U1' Cleve : Pal4or ring. qtr# 10824 Nvr•t�ndde'$Ivd., 952 -'3. Mp k Ja7 �I ADVANCED M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN, M.D., FAAD DERMATOLOGY & MEDICAL DIRECTOR \ COSMETIC MELISSA WATERMAN, PA -C 1LNSTITUTE, t�. DENISE BARNHARDT, PA -C COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY August 11, 2014 Cary Teague - Community Development Director Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St Re: Proposed Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project: 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Dear Mr. Teague: Please find attached a petition with over 150+ signatures of patients and customers of our clinics, Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute and Advanced Skin Therapeutics, who are in opposition to the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning of 3330 West 66th Street which is required for Beacon's proposed supportive housing project. These signatures are from patients and customers who actively come to our clinic who wish to voice their concern about placing a supportive housing development in a medically zoned area right next door to our facility. These are not just random signatures from community members who are supporting a cause, who are often unaware of all the potential repercussions of the proposed rezoning. Also enclosed are 72# postcards from our clinics' patients and customers in opposition to the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning. We wish to provide the Planning Commission with further information regarding the negative economic impact and financial hardships for our clinics' business and operations which will be caused if the Beacon supportive housing proposal goes forward. We purchased our building for $1,015,000 in 1997. We then paid for an initial build out at $650,000 and a phase 2 build out at $350,000. Since 1997, we have paid $541,000 in property taxes on our building to Hennepin County. Thus, our total property investment within the Regional Medical District is currently over $2.5 million. These figures do not include any furnishings or equipment. We have been planning a proposed building renovation valued at $150,000. However, we have been forced to put this renovation on hold due to the potential re- zoning of 3330 West 66th Street. We are very concerned that if this property, at such close proximity, is re -zoned to allow supportive housing in the Regional Medical District, our business will suffer due to the loss of patients and we will be unable to go forward with the addition. If the proposal continues, we CHASKA MAIN OFFICE SHAKOPEE 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 6525 BARRIE ROAD ° EDINA, MN 55435 1515 ST. FRANCIS AVENUE #250 CHASKA, MN 55318 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-915-6000 FAx:952- 915 -6100 .- Date Name Signature Address L -� i[Ykae -ii 'KV ol C��. � 3- A(o(A L ► 12� ., 13k Ub Ll�. P` Date Name SignIure Address M 0 A Sl � Lei il �4y /IoJ k:�A—,,-U— YIx—) - 3 ve-L o�c�� �Y� \ r Y. Ar ; �u� °�f� �s - .� sp �,�I�1 Ik ;i Ak L ♦ � P Date Name Signature Address -7/ j(r1Gl` , r t 6,rK be - Q�C, (v 1 $ I I f TWIN+ I'�'�'�/L��'I� LG �✓�Wl �L S a t 'v r1 , Q` Date Name Signature Address ? /cl, `1/ 1'- ;��'� c �y C �t a� `� (J'(8 1544 v6x j f GEC �c �/je for fa, ��? 43 s - %� 7/� q� JvL &41 (2- Vpih 10 &/40 ell IA —d3 y -Q' GG `rt G�� \ ills Ll ���8' a t 'r Signature �.. � -�li: �� tom. I ►� " �/�'�:��f.'A =is ��JWi-"aiYy �. '� �; agm Imp.J ■ a t 'r Date Name Sign �trire Address /V/- zyle 44,w iL�J �t(o Z (`�~� I( r r ILLcc tjle LCIL-� I ! EL T--Z- / L1 4 h2 I 8,aAnk a a Date Name Signature Address �" �` �/� -�-- ��►tic �f �� �l c�� (�:. r ice- / Zvi T�l�l IM , �� YS a er �" �al.�t /mil 3 pro AA r 1. C IPf 4% r e 7 oZ°r..1 Lj IQ CA vy ► � `�``" � A-0. 6Mk � f 2� �{ (c� �c vlr� x . 37o �r�. rW►--e MV -r-e- rT2 q- '/ VOW F, r�(Cc�(,� 11wS'U t jr,' rivc A 3 �c Q✓ A4 Ai (NIT V r_ �c RV! A) A-'X7,J P" <<-(- D l 6>1 t r 9 F. III � `G a Address WNMI rI lill A r ra M. Mw 4 1 Lo % %a i I Im 611 , . 1 so I., - .. / 'W/,W/, ffm � _I_� I,1 / -m f ti-ir-if /A �Aw ,� P U r .�� -F�I i / l 't W-i �� ■ ■ t r 9 F. III � `G a Signature WHAWIMUMIX MeMlo -' MA- Rq A l L/ ME A,- / I ' W/..Awj 1 111 M ffl- W-1 a NO -1 M 4 RAJ . . . . . . . . • - Iffiro: �l IN I, M, M., lar'm'/ 3, MMON I � I U1, w1a WIFEMEMP .�I�_ r mrarIM-0 M�IIVIMA "mi'm -2. "",/TM �/ �� ill,, �� r •r �' r Lee MIN r� r / a � P Signature Address r OrN Date Name Signature Address r lc"-rlL)fj 633 V, he ci) A C-0 SI! w 1/a 9 / 3A SbAckl ems. ��'l on. "- �,erclz ; fiw , Ain)m V7/ `j 3c) la� -e►� 96 4sx�� lbl hi( L1flDft&jlly ti 4 jlk 4� V90 / Yo (/a AL L 7 J ` - .3Z xk S-E , -e 67 x�.cs��,� X1 W L —L�. ,,d c,L 7 / y /4I'l 4 L y A /�/ !0 /yf ,Lp b I Lf � �-1 26A - - Signa - �A / I ME� I�' I / � / � �. � 11 KPIP.001" 0 ® q 2 MMON4,20�M_ MEMO err ',� ,1/ "M WA RIA FA RVA, ff mim 1! ■ a t i• We need your support, so please sign our petition to prevent rezoning: Date Name Signature Address L2C�� �:ci 1e4 3� C✓i !}v� �rstLi N5,sLi t � LL c is D q � —I {L� q, A, �' Alv& G e..5 e.. �. .,Q, �37�v �x ��� ,, G'%cc -,BIZ �S S- e...'1 /%'l S—e,3 / ;4' &chi ut.v✓ Af, At'Lf j �f 4 ` &t7A--,A -C s UANkJ ool A All, 644ex—., bt e �iY 3KS P�r -001ob'e'u, iM, I i� iv, k) CA Veit -'qjVIV;1;4 M11) 1 � ✓ (� 44 169 Ccj 5( CtLk— L A..� -V f% //X t'lGl Swvlu 5 J� A� -37 NJ4 C), a - o; - ez �� Si, Apt 36-3-3 I Lz, I't L qud t i�c��� 6- ' r ►v ✓� - >I A 14 August 11, 2014 Page 2 would not be able to continue to invest in the City of Edina due to economic concerns associated with such a drastic change and erosion of the Regional Medical District. We are not alone in our concerns and several other neighboring landowners have also expressed concerns regarding the negative economic impact of allowing supportive housing in the Regional Medical District. If the Beacon project is allowed to proceed, the integrity of the Regional Medical District will be impaired and future investments such as ours will be discouraged. For the above reasons, we respectfully request that you recommend denial of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning required for Beacon's supportive housing proposal. In doing so, you will confum the City's dedication to a premier medical district in the State and solidify future investments for the Regional Medical District and City of Edina as a whole. Sincerely, M.E. Bri eaMD CEO &Medical Director ' cBride res ent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA ldvananc ed Skin Therapeutics 6525 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952 -915 -6000 Enclosure 4838 - 1564 -0092, v. 1 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 1 Larkin Hoffi ATTORNEYS August 12, 2014 Commission Chair Kevin Staunton Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Vice Chair Michael Platterer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Claudia Carr Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Arlene Forrest Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Susan Lee Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren I.ta- 1500 Wells _Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952. 835.3800 FAX: 952- 896.3333 WEB: www.larkinhoffinaII.com Commission Member Jo Ann Olsen Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Ken Potts Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Nancy Scherer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Michael Schroeder Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Re: Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project, 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN (the "Project ") Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Our File No. 23193 -02 Dear Chair Staunton and Planning Commission Members: We represent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, P.A. and Advanced Skin Therapeutics. While we applaud and support the City's commitment to finding a site in Edina for supportive housing for homeless teens, we are concerned that the City's efforts to support the Project at the proposed location have: 1) resulted in several procedural and legal errors, which continue to mount as the Project is rapidly pushed forward; and 2) disregarded the concerns of existing long -time landowners' who have invested significant resources in the area. The choice of location must be Edina Planning Commission Page 2 carefully selected instead of forcing this Project into a location that will cause significant problems for adjacent landowners, the district at large, and the City as a whole. This letter supplements our previous letter dated July 22, 2014 (Exhibit 1) as well as the attached adjacent landowners' letters (Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). In addition to the previously addressed issues, there are several additional legal concerns that the Planning Commission and the City Council should consider. 1. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cannot Take Effect Untillt.Is Approved By The City Council, Given A 60 -Day Review Period And Approval By The Me, tropolitan Council. Under Minnesota Statute, the City cannot implement any measures that would allow development or re- zoning in a manner which conflicts with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Any changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council'`before the proposed amendment can go into effect and before any re- zoning can be allowed. Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan must first be properly amended, then, and only then, can the City. Council consider re- zoning. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.355 and Minn. Stat. § 473.864(2), the City Council must submit any amendment to a City's Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review. Minn. Stat. § 473.854 grants the Metropolitan Council the authority to "adopt guidelines and procedures" relating to Comprehensive Plan amendments. This procedure is specifically required when there is a need to change a land use designation to allow a proposed development. (see Metropolitan Council_ Local Planning Handbook, Exhibit 7). Before submitting the amendment to ,the Metropolitan Council for review, the City is required to obtain Planning Commission and City Council approval and provide adjacent governmental units and affected school districts up to 60 days to review and comment on the amendment. Only upon completion of those steps may the City submit a proposed amendment for review to the Metropolitan Council. Once submitted, the Metropolitan Council has 60'to 120 days to review the application for compatibility and conformity with the metropolitan system plans. Minn. Stat. § 473.175. The City must receive approval from the Metropolitan Council before the City can effect any changes. Id. The City has not yet followed, or indicated that it intends to follow, this required procedure for the proposed amendment. Under state law, the City Council must first approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment by a-.2/3 majority vote following a hearing with proper notice. The City Council must then provide the 60 review period. After the review period, the City Council must submit the amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review. Only if the Metropolitan Council approves the amendment, can the City consider re- zoning the parcel for the Project. The City cannot bypass state mandated requirements to amend the Comprehensive Plan or enact any action that conflicts with the existing Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Proposed Re- Zoning Cannot Be Considered Until The City's Comprehensive Plan Has Seen Properly Amended. Minn. Stat. § 473.865 confirms that "[a] local'governmental unit shall not adopt any official control or fiscal device which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan or which permits activity in conflict Edina Planning Commission Page 3 with metropolitan system plans." Minn. Stat. § 473.852 defines "official controls" to include zoning ordinances. The proposed re- zoning for the Project is an official control in direct contradiction to the City's Comprehensive Plan and cannot be considered until the City follows the state - mandated procedures to amend the Comprehensive Plan as described above. An approval to re -zone for the Project in conflict with the City's current Comprehensive Plan and prior to the proper approval of the proposed amendment violates Minnesota law. The City cannot simultaneously pass a Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning proposal for the Project as the re- zoning conflicts with the existing Comprehensive Plan. Instead, the Comprehensive Plan amendment must be completed and take effect prior to the consideration of a re- zoning proposal. The Planning Commission should not recommend approval of the re- zoning required for the Project as the re- zoning proposal is in conflict with the City's current Comprehensive Plan and would be in violation-of Minnesota law. 3. The Proposed Re- Zoning Does Not Meet The City Code's Re- Zoning Requirements. The. City Code sets forth factors to be considered by the Commission in determining whether to recommend re- zoning. Section 36 -216 of the Code provides that the Commission must make a favorable finding that the proposed re- zoning: (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan; (2) Is consistent with the preliminary site plan as approved and modified by the council and contains the council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the final site plan; (3) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; (4) Will not result in an overly intensive land use; (5) Will not result in undue traffic -congestion or traffic hazards; (6) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and (7) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features Proper application and consideration of these factors requires a denial of the proposed re- zoning for the Project. a. The proposed re- zoning is in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed re- zoning for the Project is clearly in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the land on which the Project would be located as the Regional Medical District. The Regional Medical District is required to be used for medical - related and Edina Planning Commission Page 4 senior housing uses. The proposed use is supportive housing for homeless teens which does not remotely relate to the designated uses. b. The proposed re- zoning will be detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposed re-zoning for the Project will. allow a supportive housing project in the - Regional Medical District. This will cause an erosion of the State's premier medical district, loss of local investment, discouragement of future investments, and a decreased tax base. Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, a prime medical facility in Minnesota, has already delayed a $150,000 expansion project due to the anticipated effects if the proposed re- zoning is approved. Further detrimental impacts to surrounding property owners are detailed in our letter dated July. 22, 2014 as well as adjacent landowner letters. (Exhibits 1-6). C. The =wosed re- zoning will result in undue traffic congestion and traffic hazards. The proposed re- zoning for the Project will result in significant traffic congestion and traffic hazards in the area While it has been contended that the traffic and parking will not be negatively impacted, the SPACK study inadequately addresses the situation. The comparison to Beacon's Minneapolis projects is inadequate to predict the traffic -and parking effects of Beacon's Edina proposal. Additionally, the location on a centrally located primary comer on one of only two north - south arteries through the Regional Medical District will cause traffic congestion and issues with access and visibility. Further, the Project requires a parking variance of 19 spaces. The deficiency in the proposed parking, along with a lack of on= street parking, will create a conflict with neighboring properties, who maintain parking for customers and employees. d. The proposed re- zoning does not conform to the Code. The proposed re- zoning to include a supportive housing project in the Regional Medical District does not conform to the provisions of Chapter 36 of the City Code or other applicable provisions such as those governing the implementation of a Planned Development Unit ( "PUD "), as discussed below. The proposed re- zoning is also inconsistent with the Regional Medical District and the Comprehensive Plan generally, as discussed above. e. The proposed re- zoning does not provide a proper relationship between the proposed improvements and existing structures. The proposed re- zoning required for the Project does not maintain a proper relationship with the existing structures in the Regional Medical District. Supportive housing is not a permitted use within this district devoted to health- related'uses. Even with an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, supportive housing would detrinmentally affect the existing surrounding businesses which located in the area. to be -part of a premier medical office center. Eroding the purpose of the District erodes the integrity, of the District. The proposed re- zoning for the Project fails to meet the requirements of the City Code. Therefore, the Commission should not recommend approval to the City Council. Edina Planning Commission Page 5 4. The Proposed Re- Zoning Does Not, Meet The City's PUD Requirements. The City Code sets out specific requirements and considerations in zoning a Planned Unit Development ( "PUD "). Section 36 -254 of the Code makes clear that to be eligible for a PUD all development should be in compliance with the following: (1) Where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one land use in the comprehensive plan, the city may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the city council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this chapter and the comprehensive; plan; (2) Any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted, provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this chapter and the comprehensive plan; (3) Permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the comprehensive plan; and (4) The setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but maybe departed from to. accomplish the purpose and intent described in subsection (b)(1) of this section. The proposed re- zoning required for the Project fails to meet these requirements. e-P It is clear that despite how the Project has been characterized, it is.the development of supportive housing. The PUD proposed language does not include a supportive housing use. Instead, the proposed PUD simply requests use for affordable housing. In order to properly zone this property for the proposed use, the proposed PUD would need to allow multi - family use, affordable housing use, and supportive housing use. Even if the PUD is considered to. involve a single land use type, neither the applicable supportive housing nor the misleading affordable housing use is consistent with the objectives of Chapter 36 or. the Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed parking setback regulations, building coverage and floor area do not conform to the most closely related conventional zoning district. The Project does not comply with the parking requirements, setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratios of the most closely related conventional zoning district. In addition, the Project fails to meet the parking requirements for the District, requiring a 19 -stall variance. The Project would also need floor area ratio variance. The proposed PUD does not meet the City's requirements and, as such, should not be approved. Edina Planning Commission Page 6 5. The Proposed Re- Zoning Does Not Conform. To The Purpose And Intent Of PUDs. Section 36 -253 of the City Code confirms that the, purpose and intent of PUDs is to include most or all of the following: (1) Provide for the establishment of planned unit development (PUD) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan; (2) Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety; comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the city; (3) Provide for variations to the strict application,of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design` elements that exceed the:city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian- oriented design and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; (4) Ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; (5) Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; (6) Preserve and enhance site characteristics, including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views and screening; (7) Allow fornmixing of land uses within a development; (8) Encourage a variety of housing types, including affordable housing; and (9) Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The Project does not meet all, or even most, of these stated purposes. It fails to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Instead, the Project is in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan and is incompatible; with, surrounding land uses. In addition, the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is inconsistent with the vision and goals of, the Comprehensive Plan, including effective and valued city services, a balance of land uses, and a livable environment with premier schools and safe streets. Instead of supporting Edina Edina Planning Commission Page 7 Public Schools and maintaining,an exemplary public education system for the community, the Project has completely disregarded the Montessori school located less than 300 feet away. The Project also does not promote or protect the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, or general welfare of the City. Instead, expanding the scope of the Regional Medical District will discourage investments in the City thereby reducing the economic viability and general welfare of the City. In addition, increased crime will likely follow the Project. (See commentary from Step by Step Montessori Schools and Minneapolis Police Call Log for service at Beacon's 3710 Nicollet Ave. location, Exhibit 3). Clearly, this will negatively impact the health, safety, and comfort of owners and users of the Regional Medical District. Finally, the intent to maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities will be diminished. The Project requires a parking variance due to the lack of off -street parking. At the same time, traffic will increase due to the addition of multi - family supportive housing. The intent and purposes of PUDs are not furthered by the Project. Therefore, approval should not be recommended. 6. Approving The Requested Re- Zoning Would Constitute Spot - Zoning In Violation Of Minnesota Law. ' Minnesota courts have consistently ruled that spot - zoning to benefit a specific project to the detriment of others is prohibited. The Minnesota Supreme Court has determined that the biggest problem with zoning a planned development on a relatively small tract is the possibility of spot - zoning. The court defined spot - zoning.as "reclassification of a small area of land in a manner that is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood for the benefit of the property owner and to the detriment of others." Amcom Corp. v. Eagon, 348 N.W.2d 66, 73 n.6 (Minn. 1984). The Minnesota Court of Appeals explained that spot - zoning is "zoning changes ... which establish muse classification inconsistent with surrounding uses and create an island of nonconforming use within a larger zoned district." Watam Twp. Citizen Alliance v. Benton Cnty. Bd. of Commis, 728 N.W.2d 82, 91 (Minn. App. 2007). The American Law Reports ( "ALR ") provides the following factors to be considered in determining illegal spot- zoning: Mhether the zoning of the parcel in question is in accordance with a comprehensive plan; whether the zoning of the subject parcel is compatible with the uses in the surrounding area; and whether the zoning of the subject property serves the public welfare or merely confers a discriminatory benefit on the owner of the property. Determination Whether Zoning or Rezoning of a Particular Parcel Constitutes Snot Zoning, 73 A.L.R. 5th 223. The proposed re- zoning from Planned Office District -1 to a Planned Development Unit for the specific benefit of the Project and to the detriment of the surrounding property owners would violate Minnesota's prohibition of spot- zoning. First, the parcel to be re -zoned is a small plot of land 39,204 square feet in size. Re- zoning the parcel to allow for the addition of a supportive housing project is not compatible with the surrounding Regional Medical District. The proposed classification would create an island of nonconforming use within the larger Regional Medical District. Edina Planning Commission Page 8 In addition, the Regional Medical District is a premier medical district in the state. This re- zoning would erode the integrity of the district, negatively impact ongoing investments, discourage future investments, diminish the tax base, cause significant parking and traffic issues, and open the door for additional housing units changing the very nature of the Regional Medical District: The landowners .within the Regional: Medical District confirm that the proposal' is mconipatible with their use" the surrounding property. (Exhibits' 1 -5). The re- zoning would be entirely for the benefit of the property owner and to the detriment of others. Further, the proposed zoning does not serve the public welfare. As investment in the Regional Medical District is discouraged, the'stability of the area and numerous employment opportunities will be lost. At the same time, increased crime will likely follow the Project. Clearly, re- zoning this small area solely for the benefit of this inconsistent use and to the detriment of the surrounding consistent uses constitutes illegal spot - zoning and should not be approved. 7. The City's Continued Efforts To Make This Square Peg Fit Into A Round Hole Demonstrates That The Decision Is Arbitrary. a. City Staff has consistently used an incorrect definition of the Project to justify approval, The Beacon application itself confirms that the Project is a supportive housing project, not just an affordable housing Project as staff reports have repeatedly stated. In its explanation, the application uses the terms "supportive service" and "supportive, affordable housing." Yet, the City Staff in its reports and commentary refer to the Project as "affordable housing" and "39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18 -22) who have experienced homelessness." A supportive housing project is dramatically different than an affordable housing option for young adults who have experienced homelessness, and it has a significantly different effect on adjacent landowners. The State of Minnesota as well as many surrounding cities have experienced and understand this difference and accordingly apply stringent licensing requirements and zoning restrictions on supportive housing which are not applicable to standard affordable housing. b. City Staff has rushed this project forward to receive State and Metropolitan Council Funding. City Staff recommended the Project for Metropolitan Council funding prior to even submitting it to the Planning Commission for approval. In fact, in its submission for Metropolitan Council funding, the Staff also mislabels the proposed re- zoning, failing once again to describe the Project as supportive housing. (Exhibit 8). The City Staff s effort to rush this Project forward for approval has resulted in the failure to follow proper state - mandated procedures for re- zoning. In attempting to rush the process in order to make the Project eligible for State and Metropolitan Council fanding,the City Staff combined the re- zoning request and proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment in violation of Minnesota Law. For all the reasons set forth herein and in our letter dated July 22, 2014 (Exhibit 1), and due to the many legal and procedural errors that have been made thus far in this requested re- zoning for the Project, we request that the Planning Commission deny Beacon's request to re -zone the parcel for Edina Planning Commission Page 9 the Project. If the Commission is poised to recommend approval, we request that the Commission postpone a decision until it can adequately address and alleviate the many legal and procedural errors that have tainted the re- zoning process. Absent correction, these irregularities constitute a denial of due process rights guaranteed to neighboring properties and sufficient legal grounds to invalidate any recommendation or approval of the proposed re- zoning for the Project. Sincerely, G� Robert C. Long, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & ntd. Direct Dial: 952- 896 -3232 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1779 Email: rlonp(@larkinhoffman.com 4835 - 5415 -2220, v. 2 Larkin Hoffman ATT O RNEYS July 22, 2014 Commission Chair Kevin Staunton Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Vice Chair Michael Platterer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Claudia Carr Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Arlene Forrest Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Susan Lee Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Exhibit 1 Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952.835 -3800 PAX: 952- 89633�3�3 WEB: wwwlarldnhoffman.com Commission Member Jo Ann Olsen Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Ken Potts Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Nancy Scherer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN,' 55424 Commission Member Michael Schroeder Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Re: Proposed Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project: 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Our File No. 23193 -02 Dear Chair Staunton and Planning Commission Members: We represent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, P.A. ( "ADCI ") and Advanced Skin Therapeutics, both of which are adjacent property owners to the proposed supportive housing project for homeless teens at 3330 West 66th Street in Edina. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative ( "Beacon ") has requested an amendment to Edina's Comprehensive Plan and the rezoning of 3330 66th Street West to allow for a proposed multi- Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 2 family, supportive housing project for homeless teens. We submit this letter in opposition to Beacon's requested amendments. We applaud and support the City's goal of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. We-also support the City,'s search for a suitable location for a supportive housing project for homeless teens in the City of.Edina. However, as outlined below, there are serious. concerns and reasons to oppose the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and re- zoning needed for the project to be built at 3330 66th Street West. Beacon's proposed housing project has been identified by the applicant as simply an affordable housing apartment building for homeless teens or as the Planning Commission's Hearing Notice states, "39 units of small studio apartments." In reality, this is a multi- family supportive housing project for homeless teems that is subject to the state and local regulatory and licensing requirements governing lodging establishments offering supportive services. The.proposed amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and rezoning request raise several separate legal and policy issues that warrant the City's attention and should compel the Planning Commission to recommend denial of the requested Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments needed for the proposed Beacon project. 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Beacon's request to rezone 3330 66th Street West for their supportive housing project requires an amendment to Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the City's Zoning Code have several legal problems. a. Vague Definition of Affordable Housing . The first legal issue is in the language of the proposed amendment including a change in the Comprehensive Plan to allow. for "affordable housing" in the Regional Medical District without clearly defining what constitutes "affordable housing." This vague and unclear definition of "affordable housing" will raise future legal challenges for the Planning Commission and the City in addressing future proposals for affordable supportive housing projects within the City. Lacking a clear definition of "affordable housing" and, without a clearer definition of "supportive housing" in the City Code, future applicants will be able to take advantage of this broad, vague definition of affordable housing and propose any kind of affordable supportive housing projects anywhere in the Medical District or elsewhere in the City zoned for multi - family housing. If the Regional Nledical' District is re -zoned to allow for multi - family affordable supportive housing, the City will -be unable to limit other similar proposals in the future such as multi - family supportive housing that is not for homeless teens but instead, for homeless adults or other special needs groups requiring "supportive services." Once the City makes an exception for the Beacon supportive housing'project, it will be unable to deny proposals for other similar supportive housing projects elsewhere in the City. Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 3 b. The Beacon Project is a Lodging Establishment with Supportive Services The next issue lies in the divide, between what the project has been labeled by Beacon and its actual use and operation. While Beacon labels the proposal as an affordable 39 -unit apartment building for homeless teens, it also explains in its Explanation of Request and Description of Project that the housing is to be a supportive housing project that provides supportive services to homeless teens. Beacon states the project: is supportive, affordable.housing for young adults who have experienced homelessness. The goal is to support the tenants as they learn to live independently and develop their skills to be financially independent thereby ending the cycle of homelessness. The building will be staffed by specialists serving homeless young adults. Our supportive service approach Lis also designed to create a sense of belonging and place for residents and to foster healthy relationships between youth and caring adults with professional training and skills. This definition is not only.in the Explanation of Request and Description but incorporated by reference into. the proposed zoning ordinance amendment § 36- 494(c) as set forth in the Planning Commission staff report. Despite the misleading label of an affordable housing project, the proposal is actually a "Lodging Establishment" that provides "supportive services" to young adults as defined in the Edina City Code ( "City Code ") and Minnesota Statutes, and as such is subject to those regulatory and licensing requirements. The City Code makes clear that Minnesota Statutes § §157.15 and 157.17 are incorporated by reference. See City Code, § 20 -387. Additionally, City Code, § 20 -384 states that a " [h]otel, lodging establishment and boarding establishment are as defined in Minn. Stats. § 157.15." Therefore, Minn. Stat. §§ 157.15 and 157.17 have been made a part of the City Code itself. Minn. Stat. § 157.15(8) defines a lodging establishment as: [A] building, structure, enclosure, or any part thereof used as, maintained as, advertised as, or held out to be a place where sleeping accommodations are furnished to the public as regular roomers, for periods of one week or more, and having five or more beds to let to the public. The Beacon proposal involves 39 separate units for rent to young adults from the public as regular roomers who are seeking long -term permanent housing elsewhere as they end their homelessness. A lodging establishment is distinguished from a hotel or motel where accommodations are for periods of less than week. Minn. Stat. § 157.15(7). Applying the details of the Beacon project to the statute results in a clear understanding that it is a lodging establishment. Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 4 The next applicable statute is Minn. Stat, § 157.17(1) which defines "supportive services" as follows: Supportive services means the provision of supervision and minimal assistance with independent living skills`such`as social and recreational opportunities, assistance with 'transportation, arranging for meetings and appointments, and arranging for medical and social services. Supportive services also include providing reminders to residents to take medications that are self- administered or providing storage for medications if requested. By Beacon's own admission, this is an affordable housing project providing "supportive services" to homeless teens:; According to the Explanation, 6f,Request and Description of Project, the Beacon building will "be staffed by specialists serving homeless young adults." The goal is to "support the tenants as they learn to live independently and develop their skills to be financially independent." The project will have a "supportive service approach." Again, a reasonable application of the facts to the law leads to the conclusion that the Beacon project provides "supportive services." As a lodging establishment providing supportive services, the project requires a license to operate pursuant to City Code, § 20- 385.and Minn. Stat. § 157.17. Even if the proposal did not provide supportive services, it would still require a license as a lodging establishment under Code, § 20 -385. A lodging establishment providing supportive services is very different than simply an affordable housing apartment building for homeless teens. That is why the State of Minnesota and City of Edina, along with other neighboring cities; have imposed strict licensing and zoning requirements on lodging establishments and other housing establishments providing supportive services. The applicant's. label of the project as simply affordable housing for homeless teens is very misleading and it is crucial that this lodging establishment providing supportive services be treated under the City Code and State law for what it is rather than the label an applicant uses. C. Inconsistency Within the Ciky Code Another legal concern associated with the Beacon proposal is the inconsistency within the City Code as it relates to-these larger supportive housing projects. City Code, § 20 -384 defines a boarding and lodging establishment as "an establishment which includes boarding and lodging for five or more regular boarders, but no more than ten regular boarders, for periods of one week or more." But, within the exact same section, the Code states that " f hotel, lodging establishment and boarding establishment are defined in Minn.`Stats. § 157.15." Furthermore, Code, '§ 20- 387 specifically incorporates by reference the State of Minnesota definition of a lodging. establishment found in Minn. Stat. § 157.15, which contains no upper limit on the number of boarders. The City Code is inconsistent and in conflict with the State statutes in this area and amendments to the City Code should be made to address these inconsistencies and conflicts. Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 5 Before the City grants a request for amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and City Code allowing for a lodging establishment that provides supportive services in the Medical District, it should take a step back and consider the consequences. The City Code should be clarified to identify what specifications identify a lodging establishment, supportive services housing project, group home, or other similar type of supportive housing project. Amending the Comprehensive Plan for an applicant prior to these clarifications within the City Code will inhibit the City's ability to address these needed zoning changes. d. Bad Zoning Precedent for the City If the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and re- zoning is approved, it will be legally impossible for the City to distinguish this current Beacon supportive housing project from other future supportive housing projects such as those intended for homeless adult males,, or other adults'requiring supportive services such as chemical dependency or mental health services. 'The City is not able to rezone a location for a type of supportive services for a group that they agree with but then refuse to rezone a location for a type of supportive service or population group with which they disagree. e. Needed Changes to the City's Zoning Code Cities in the metropolitan area have dealt with similar proposed supportive housing projects and have found that certain special zoning and regulations are appropriate and necessary for these types of supportive housing projects, which differ substantially and are treated differently from regular affordable housing projects which do not provide on -site supportive services. Cities such as Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park specifically define these - projects that provide supportive services and,each city lays out zoning requirements for the °operation and location of such supportive housing projects. The City of Minneapolis; for example, adopted requirements in Chapter 536 defining supportive housing projects, like Beacon's, as community residential facilities or supportive housing . projects. (See attached Minneapolis Zoning Ordinance.) Minneapolis determined strict zoning requirements limiting the zones in which community residential facilities or supportive housing may be developed. Minneapolis further imposes licensing requirements and distance requirements from other supportive housing or community residential facilities. The Edina City Code should be updated to include new provisions governing the zoning and siting of larger community residential facilities and supportive housing projects'like Beacon's before any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or City Code are adopted allowing such supportive housing projects in areas of the City where they were previously not allowed, such as the Medical District. 2. MORATORIUM ON LAND USE CHANGES FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROJECTS Since the City Code does not adequately address the zoning distinctions and definitions of supportive housing projects and lodging establishments, we propose that the City adopt a moratorium on land use changes related to supportive housing projects, including the current Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 6 Beacon proposal; so. as to consider the inconsistencies of Edina's City Code and fashion regulations that best serve the needs of Edina by adopting some of the zoning provisions being used by-neighboring cities to regulategroup homes, community residential facilities, supportive housing'p;ojects and'lodging establishments. CONCLUSION For all the reasons'stated above, we respectfully request the Edina Planning Commission to deny Beacon's request for an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and re- zoning for the property at 3330 West 66th Street. We further recommend that the Planning Commission and the City establish amoratorium on future land use changes relating'to supportive` housing projects until the City's Zoning Code can be studied'and updated to better address these types of special supportive Rousing projects. Sincerely, C Robert C. Long, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lind en Ltd. Direct Dial: 952- 896 -3232 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1779 Email: rlone @larkinhoffman.com 481947244412, v. I 3) SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REGARDING CRY'S AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING (536.10 -201 Purpose. Specific development standards are established to provide supplemental regulations to address the unique characteristics of certain land uses. [536.10] Specific development standards. The uses .listed below are subject to the following specific development standards,.in addition to all other applicable regulations: A) Community residential facility , I. The use "shall be located at least one - fourth (1/4) mile from all existing community residential facilities. 2. On -site services shall be for residents of the facility only, except where part of a regimen of scheduled post - residential treatment. 3. To the extent practical, all new construction or additions to existing buildings shall be compatible with the scale and !character of the surroundings, and exterior building materials shall be harmonious with other buildings in the neighborhood. 4. An appropriate transition area between the use and adjacent property shall be provided by landscaping, screening, and other site improvements consistent with the character of the neighborhood. 5. The operator shall submit a management plan for the facility and a floor plan showing sleeping areas, emergency exits and bathrooms. [536.20] B) Supportive housing 1. Supportive housing shall be located at least one - fourth ( 1/4) mile from all existing supportive housing and from all of the following uses, except in the 134H Overlay District: • Community correctional facility. • Community residential facility. • Inebriate housing. • Motel. Overnight shelter. 2. The maximum number of persons served shall not exceed thirty-two (32), except in the B4H Overlay District. 3. On -site services shall be for residents of the facility only, except where part of a regimen of scheduled post - residential 'treatment. 4. To the extent practical, all new construction or additions'to existing buildings shall be compatible with the scale and character of the surroundings, and exterior building materials shall be harmonious with other. buildings in the neighborhood. 5. An appropriate transition area between the use and adjacent property shall be provided by landscaping, screening, and other site improvements consistent with the character of the neighborhood. 6. The operator shall submit a management plan for the facility and a floor plan showing sleeping areas, emergency exits and bathrooms. [536.20] 4) FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS APPLICABLE TO SUCH USES 15253001 Purpose of conditional use permits. A conditional use permit (C.U.P.) allows the city to review uses, which because of their unique characteristics, cannot be permitted as of right in a particular zoning district, but which may be allowed upon showing that such use in a specified location will comply with all of the conditions and standards of this zoning ordinance. [525.300] Required fincMo for conditional use permits. The city planning commission shall make each of the following findings before granting a conditional use permit: I. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare. 2. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for .uses permitted in the district. 3. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, necessary facilities or other measures, have been or will be provided. 4. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 5. The conditional use is, consistent with the applicable policies of the, comprehensive plan. 6: The conditional-use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. [525.340] 5) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE LAND,USE APPROVAL PROCESS 1. Applicants must be aware variances to the '/4 mile spacing requirement,(the development standards of. section 536 EXIST ONLY IN THE CASE OF RELOCATION of an existing facility, resulting in a greater degree of conformance with the %, mile spacing standard. 2. The applicant bears the responsibility for ensuring the '/4 mile requirement has been met via the following methods: a) Research by the applicant b) City records c) the map of existing facilities. 3 May l5, 2014 Exhibit 2 M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN. M.D.. FAAD MEDICAL DIRfrnw MELISSA WATERMAN. PA-C DENISE BARNHARDT. PA-C COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY Mayor Hovland & City Councilmembers City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Strengthening the Edina Regional Medical District Dear Mayor and Councihnembers: We are writing this letter on behalf of the medical office property owners and tenants of the area north of 66th Street West and East of France Avenue in the City of Edina, known as the Edina Regional Medical District. We are proud to be a part of one of the premier medical office districts in the entire State of Minnesota, and, as a group and individually, we have spent considerable resources to locate, build, and expand our businesses in this district.. We hope that the City will continue to encourage this type of development and protect the investments that we have made in the community, and further attract new investments to the Edina Regional Medical District. In light of this, we strongly encourage the City to strengthen and protect the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District and deny any request to rezone the property, located at 3330 66th Street West (formerly TCF Bank), to allow a lower- density multi- family development. Premier Regional Medical District The Edina Regional Medical District is one of the premier medical districts in the state. The City has a history of supporting this district where medical and dental offices and clinics, laboratories, and other health service- related businesses can thrive. The City's commitment has helped to attract a range of health services - related businesses to the area. With. every one of these businesses comes a significant investment in building and staffing our offices and clinics. We attract an educated, highly -paid workforce, many of whom establish roots in the City and make Edina their home. Our investments have, in turn, attracted further investments into the district, as other businesses seek to take advantage of the central medical office location, suitable infrastructure, and nearby amenities. We appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the Edina Regional Medical District. Opposed to Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezoning If the proposed residential project proceeds, it would require a rezoning of the property and an amendment to change the City's policy set forth in the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We strongly oppose any change that would erode the zoning integrity of this district, negatively impact ongoing investments CHASKA 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 CHASKA, MN 55318 MAIN OFFICE 6525 BARRIE ROAD' EDINA, MN 55435 PHONE: 952-915-6000 FAX: 952-915-6100 SHAKOPEE 1515 ST. FRANCIs AvENuE #250 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Ir �r.�� ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY BL COSMETIC INsrITuTE, P.A. May l5, 2014 Exhibit 2 M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN. M.D.. FAAD MEDICAL DIRfrnw MELISSA WATERMAN. PA-C DENISE BARNHARDT. PA-C COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY Mayor Hovland & City Councilmembers City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Strengthening the Edina Regional Medical District Dear Mayor and Councihnembers: We are writing this letter on behalf of the medical office property owners and tenants of the area north of 66th Street West and East of France Avenue in the City of Edina, known as the Edina Regional Medical District. We are proud to be a part of one of the premier medical office districts in the entire State of Minnesota, and, as a group and individually, we have spent considerable resources to locate, build, and expand our businesses in this district.. We hope that the City will continue to encourage this type of development and protect the investments that we have made in the community, and further attract new investments to the Edina Regional Medical District. In light of this, we strongly encourage the City to strengthen and protect the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District and deny any request to rezone the property, located at 3330 66th Street West (formerly TCF Bank), to allow a lower- density multi- family development. Premier Regional Medical District The Edina Regional Medical District is one of the premier medical districts in the state. The City has a history of supporting this district where medical and dental offices and clinics, laboratories, and other health service- related businesses can thrive. The City's commitment has helped to attract a range of health services - related businesses to the area. With. every one of these businesses comes a significant investment in building and staffing our offices and clinics. We attract an educated, highly -paid workforce, many of whom establish roots in the City and make Edina their home. Our investments have, in turn, attracted further investments into the district, as other businesses seek to take advantage of the central medical office location, suitable infrastructure, and nearby amenities. We appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the Edina Regional Medical District. Opposed to Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezoning If the proposed residential project proceeds, it would require a rezoning of the property and an amendment to change the City's policy set forth in the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We strongly oppose any change that would erode the zoning integrity of this district, negatively impact ongoing investments CHASKA 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 CHASKA, MN 55318 MAIN OFFICE 6525 BARRIE ROAD' EDINA, MN 55435 PHONE: 952-915-6000 FAX: 952-915-6100 SHAKOPEE 1515 ST. FRANCIs AvENuE #250 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Mayor & Councilmembers May 15, 2014 Page,2; -that we >iave made in "this medical office district, aad:d�soourage future from other medical offices that would otherwise locate in the community: If the Comprehensive Plan is amended to allow lower - density multi- family residential uses, such as the proposed housing project, it would permit any type of lower- density. multi- family residential development to occur in the Edina Regional Medical District In light of the current development pressures, this slippery slope could quickly attract further lower- density multi - family residential development, and eventually'eliminate the significance of the Edina Regional Medical District; thus, discouraging future growth and investment in the area from the medical industry. . Approval Would Discourage Future Investment A rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow the proposed lower - density multi- family development would destabilize and create zoning uncertainty in the Edina Regional Medical District. The Comprehensive Plan is a policy document that we, as medical offrce building owners and tenants, have relied upon to guide and protect the integrity of the City's vision for this medical district. Changing the Comprehensive Plan to cater to the pressures of added lower - density multi- family development in the. City wouldhave a chilling effect on future investment in the Edina Regional Medical District. It would send a message that the City has abandoned the vision of making the area a premier medical office center, in favor of attracting lower- density multi - family development. The prosperity of the businesses in the Edina Regional Medical District requires confidence that encourages, growth and investment, and approving this development would raise significant concerns and discourage future investment by the medical industry in the district. Loss of Properly Tax Base Due to Rezoning As property owners and business taxpayers in the City, we are concerned that any rezoning from commercial to residential districts would erode the tax base and decrease revenues for the City. The inevitable outcome would be that the deficit would fall upon us, the existing taxpayers, to make up the difference. This would be a bad precedent. Other cities have seen the impacts of an eroding tax base and gone to great lengths to preserve existing businesses and`business districts. We feel strongly thatthe City should protect the Edina Regional Medical Center DisIrict and any action to rezone a portion of this district would be the beginning of a downward trend. Moreover, there are numerous sufficient areas zoned as multi - family in the city that would allow the proposed residential development to proceed without damaging the integrity of the district and the commercial tax base. We encourage the City to work with the developer to find an appropriate location already zoned and guided for such residential development. Detrimental Parking and Traffic Impacts of Proposed Development We also strongly oppose any development that could not meet the requirements of the City's Ordinances: As it is currently proposed;" thetuilding would nearly double in size and eliminate existing surface parking. Despite the creation d39 new dwelling units, there would only be 25 surface parking stalls on site. The proposed parking is not nearly enough to accommodate the overflow for botb the residents and Mayor & Councilmembers May 15, 2014 Page 3 visitors. This will increase traffic and, with no o6- street parking in the vicinity, it will create conflict with neighboring properties, who maintain parking for customers and employees. We strongly encourage you to strengthen the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District as a premier regional medical destination and deny any request to amend the City's existing policy to allow lower - density multi- family residential development in the district. We have made significant investments to establish and build our businesses in this district in reliance on the City's commitment to preserving the area's medical- centric character. Any decision to amend the City's'Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property for residential development would be a reversal of course and put future investment in this district in 4uestion. Sincerely, t M.E. Briden, MD CEO & M dical Director Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA 6525 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 Tony Davis, Clinic Administrator Dermatology Specialists, PA 3316 West. 66th Street #200 Edina, MN 55435 952- 920 -3808 Thomas M. Keane, DDS, Owner Esthesia Oral Surgery Care PA 3400 West 66th Street #270 Edina, M14 55435 952- 920 -3844 Jim McBride, President Advanced Skin Therapeutics 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 McBride Properties 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 r Thomas ]etzer, MD, Owner/President Occupational Medicine Consultants 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 920 -5663 Carol Jetzer, Owner/President Nikki Potter, Communications Rel. Director Employee Health Assessment Professional Services Chiropractic Health & Wellness Association 3400 W. 66th Street # 128 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 952- 835 -6750 952- 920 -5663 CC: Sen. Melissa Franzen 651- 296 -6238 sen.melisa.franzen@senate.mn Rep. Paul Rosenthal 651- 296 -7803 rep.padl.rosentbal@house.mn Rep. Ron Erhardt 651- 2964363 rep.ron.erhardt@house.mn City. of Minneapolis Community Planning &'Economic Development Planning Division 250 South 4tb Street, Room 300 Minneapolis MN 55415 -1316 612 - 673 -3000 COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL FACILITY / SUPPORTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 1) DEFINITIONS FROM THE NIINNEAPOLIS ZONING ORDINANCE. A) Community residential facility. A facility where one. (l) or more'persons reside on a twenty -four (24) hour per day basis under the care and supervision of a program licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS). Community residential facilities shall not include facilities that are also eligible for licensure by the Minnesota Department,of Corrections (DOC). Note: the use is commonly referred to as a' "CRF ". [520.160] 13) &Mortive housing: A facility that provides housing for twenty-four (24) hours per day and programs or services designed to assist . residents with improving daily living skills, securing employment or obtaining permanent housing. It does not include: • Senior housing with services designed specifically to serve the needs of aging residents. • Inebriate housing. • Any facility licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS), Department of Health (DOH) or Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC). • Any other county, state or federal community correctional facility. • Fraternities, sororities or other student housing. • Any facility owned, leased or operated by the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority (MPHA). • The use of one (1) dweiiing unit on one (1) zoning lot which meets the occupancy requirements of the zoning district in which it is located. [520.160] 2) USES ALLOWED IN THE ZONING DISTRICTS, GENERALLY. A) A Community Residential- Factk (CR.177 serving six (6) or fewer persons is: permitted in all the Residence Districts (R1, R1A, R2, 11213, R3 -R6), all the Office- Residence Districts (OR1 -2 -3), and all the Commercial Districts (CI -2, C3A, C3S, C4). [546.30, 547.30, 548.30] A CRF serving seven to sixteen (7 -16) is a conditional use in the R3, R4, R5, and R6 Districts, all the Office - Residence Districts (OR1 -2 -3), and all the Commercial Districts (C1 -2, C3A, C3S, C4). [546.30, 547.30, 548.30] A CRF serving seventeen to thirty-two (17 -32) is a conditional use in the R4 -R6 Districts, the OR2 and OR3 Districts, and the C2, C3A, C3S, and C4 Districts. [546.30, 547.30, 548.30] A CRF serving seven to thirty-two persons (7 -32) is a conditional use in all Downtown zoning districts.. (549.30) A CRF is prohibited in all the Industrial districts. (550.30) B) LupDortive Housing is a conditional use in the R4 -R6 Districts, the OR2 and OR3 Office- Residence Districts, the C2 and C4 Commercial Districts, and all Downtown Districts. [546.30, 547.30, 548.30, 549.30] Attention: If you need otherdisability related accommodations, such as a sign language interpreter, accessible meeting site, or materials in alternative format, please contact 612- 673 -2162 (673 -2157 T'1'YNOICE) at least five days prior to the meeting. If you want help translating this information, call — "mong — Ceeb toom. Yog koj xay.tau kev pab txhais cov xov no ran koj dawb, hu 612- 673 -2800; Spanish - Atencian. Si desea recibir asistencia gratuita para traducir esta informaci6n, llama 612- 673 -2700; Somali - Ogow. Haddii aad dooneyso in lagaa kaalmeeyo tarjamadda macluumaadkani oo lacag la' sari wac 612- 673 -3500. Revlsed May 2010 rp . Exhibit 3 June 4, 2014 , Mayor Hovland and City Councihmembers City of Edina 48,01 W. 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Re- zoning of 3360 W. 6611 Street Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: We are Step By Step Montessori Schools. We are one of the largest M ontessmi School organizations in the. United States. We operate 8 Montessori Schools and Child Care Centers in. the T*:ia Cities and serve about 1200 children. We are not a frartchise; we are locally owned and operated. - We operate a location for the residents of Edina at 6519 Barrre Rotul: Step By Step has been in this location° for 22 . M and under prior ownership a Montessori School has served the residents of Edina in this location since 19973. Step By Step has owned the building since 1993, we invested in the area vhen many would not and *t have continued to make significant investment in the_area.to ensure that residents.have an exceptional school to bring their young children. When deciding to invest in the area much of our decision was predicated on the zoning:laws in the.area, typically we do not operate our centers in residentially zoned areas. At that time we felt very comfortable making our investment based on the stated direction by the city of Edina. Currently we serve approximately 150 children age six weeks through-six years in this location. Approximately 88 of those children and 'their families are current residents of Edina. Over the years we've prepared thousands of children in Edina for a, lifetime love of learning. We have become a trusted, partner for providing high quality early education for the children in the community. For decades we have watched the growth and improvement of this area, largely due to the city's focus on maintaining a regional medical district. We hope you and the City Council will continue to place a premium on maintaining the integrity of this medical district. We urge the council to deny any request to rezone the property, located at 3360 6611 Street West (currently TCF Bank), to allow for a multi= family supportive housing project for displaced young adults. Just to provide you a frame ofreference, our school is located Northeast of the TCF Bank building, approximately 100 yards from the middle of the current TCF Batik parking lot to our front door. We aro opposed to the rezoning for the number of issues this presents to the existing members of the community, The obvious one is parking. There are already severe limitations in parking and changing the zoning to allow for a -residence will only exasperate the problem. Our experience shows that parking is always an issue, especially when working with an existing footprint; please do not underestimate the increased traf fie brought to this small area by this project no matter what kind of estimates am provided; estimates are usually wrong. Secondly, being a business owner and taxpayer in the city of Edina for over 22 years we. are concerned about the rezoning from commercial to residential districts. Ultimately this erodes the tax base in the city and decreases revenues for tho City. Eventually this inevitable shortfall will fall to the existing taxpayers to shoulder the burden of the dministrstion affice: 4355 Highway 169 • Plymouth, MN 55442 • 763- 557 -6777 School Locations: Edina- Southdale • Brooklyn Park • Chaska • Corcoran • Maple Grove • Plvinouth • St. Anthony • 4 .wata- Ridgedale Mayor & `Councilmembers June 4; 2014 Page 2 . difference. Finally, we are also concerned about'the new uses and incompatibility this new zoning presents to child care centers. We feel this is completely incompatible with current zoning. Ms. Blons has stated this project will be similar to their existing housing project located on 3710 Nicollet Ave. Based on Minneapolis Police reports there were 51 responses byMpls -Police over a 21 month period at this address. Calls ranging from fights, assaults, domestic abuse," person with a gun, theft, property damage, etc. I've attached a copy of this report for your information. This seems like an excessive number of calls and leaves us with lots of unanswered questions regarding the impact to the children in our pro gram and the impact this has on prospective parents wishing to enroll their children in our program. We attended the City �Council meeting on May 201'. It was somewhat surprising to hear many in the council voicing such strong support during a sketch plan meeting. It certainly sounds like the council's approval is just a foregone conclusion�a id the public's input would merely be a formality. I was also very surprised to hear Ms. Blons talk with such conviction that she had talked to her neighbors regarding the project. We were equally disappointed at the public comments from Beacon Interfaith on reaching out to neighbors and members of the community. We have received no such communication so it appears Beacon is already cutting corners in this process. Where else can we expect them to cut corners? Step By Step deals with a family's most precious assets. Many prospective parents hear that a project like the proposed one is coming to the area and their imaginations conjure up all kinds of scenarios of how their children will be impacted, mainly adversely impacted, whether realistic or not does not matter. We have already had a couple comments from prospective parents asking if we were aware of the project. Needless to say they did not enrol l,their children at just the mention of someone running a supervised facility for teens in the area. We remain opposed to the rezoning of this area outlined above; we were shocked and appalled to hear -that a facility serving young adults would not be supervised 24x7 especially after receiving the police report. We certainly applaud your leadership in ttrying to support teens in transition and for finding an appropriate site where everyone in the community can embrace these young adults and support them -as they work to become self - sufficient adults. Sincerely, Ro Minor President Step By Step Montessori Schools 6519 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 763 -557 -6777 CC: Sen. Melissa Franzen 651- 296 -6238 sen melissa franzenna.senate.mn Rep. Paul Rosenthal 651- 296 -7803 e��aul rosenthal(a�ouse.nm Rep: Ron Erhardt 651- 296 -4363 Xep ron erhardtQhouse.mn Pet S 3700 BLOCK OF NICOLLErr patclame 1242012 5.52'42 PM 1288013 5:44:09 PM 2/122013 12:0333 PM 3/1/2013 4:53:09 PM 31278013 9:13:41 AM I V IJM13 4:3710 AM nriwul3 3'30:09 AM 11132014 8:41:17 PM +762014 8:27:42 AM 21'38014 4.10.49 PM .4W2012 6:00:11 AM 5/112012 6:51.00 AM 7121 01212:0252 AM 2129'973 11:4777 PM 61112013 90916 AM 1/292013 7'47.^3 PM . WNW13 7'48:12 PM 7/102113 1.3419 PM 7/62014 1001: 1S AM W IAM14 1147,43 PM 12MMIJ 4 :56:07 AM 2192012 9.38:34 PM 3/1380129.18:11 PM 4148012 2:12:41 AM 442012 71W.34 AM 4113120124:56:10 PM 5ri12012 1 :18:30 AM 61158013 2'36.30 AM 71151912 1210539 PM an4/1p12 9.16:33 PM 689191: 10.1657 AM 8 2 9191 2 11'.06,01 AM 6/291MI2 12:52'98 PM 91&7012 3-43.51 AM IWI320126J2:12PM 1 ZWM12 12 :12.00 AM 121 -3D12 3'.37:43 FM 12191912 $ 34:39 PM iwor= 1224.32 PM 3271.1013 1:40:09 AM 7/1624113 7:!3:17 PM 31,42013 9:16:54 AM 3/4120132:5151 PM 3111_013 10:41:16 PM 4171913 239'31 PM 4II042Di3 337:51 PM SI261913124101 AM 8/8/2013 658:32 PM IWI12013 3:54:36 PM 1!172013 1'04:02 AM 12/1092013 1.11.17 PM 12212013 9:3009 PM 1'239201 3 221 16 AM 122'013 3:01:1? AM JAIM14 1:01:04 PM 2/31.1014 7.24:32 AM :!178014 4:361t5 061 21172014 51406 AM 316/914 2m.-04 PM 3nr,014 2.46.29 AM 482014 1139:18 FM 4AM14 1059:53 PM 41-3014 1841:51 PM 4/UrD14 7'47-16 FM 411:,,Wl4 3 38.46 AM 41172014 2:3046 PM 4212014 7.58.17 FM 42'12014 S.SS:41 PM Minneapolis Police Department Strattee information Crime Management Division 3000 Minnehaba Avg., Minneapolis, MN155406 (61Z) 6733082 CALLS FOR SERVICE REPORT BY BLOCK Date range: 1/112012 through $/222014 Addan Problem Oltposidoe 37W HILXAI sT AV Miizdlaneous Iuforus1 an 1700NICOIAdiTAV walk Through aBuildmg All OK 3700NICULLETAV On Site 3700NICOLLbTAV Then Repot 3700 NICOLLET AV Property Oarnap AMW-. Tagaw 3700 NICOUJT AV B alftly Business • Report Rrya1 37WNICOLLLTAV Clwk the Wc115ro Report 3700NICOLLLTAY Suspiewwpason Sumo 3700NICOLLUrAV BtlsinetsCllak 3709 NK•OLLET AV Parking Problem Inservioe 3701NIC01.1.IiT AV CbcckdwWdfam 3701 MCOUJ:T AV Bu%lwy Dwing in Progress Asses 37alN1COgA.F.TAV StspiciosPwon RepnaoWitclease 3701 NIC'UU1q AV Audible Business Alarm False 3701 NICOLt ET AV Properly Damup Aecldera Advised 3705 NICOW T AV Swptmlt4s vehicle Repon )no NICOIAXTAV swPiesasPerson Repon 3706 NICo ILET AV Swpierous Person inromouo 3706 NICOLLbT AV Propeny [bangdNit & Res No Service Run date: 583/2014 4%11 count: 170 Case 12.230241 13426035 13.040705 13.060319 13.090101 12�4WS58 13423133 14-011372 14-ONM 14433/86 12. 100116 12.137181 12.210676 I"5M45 13.171533 13-037+39 134Ls7240 13.230014 14 -MI79 APLMT. 103 203 3710NI000.ETAV Neighbor Troublt - AIVA ta.urraor 12-0:1313 - 20 3710NICOLI.ET,AV AtWWcdSuir"de Report 12-039478 3710 NICOLLEI' AV Utdutown Trouble A33151 12-071261 3710 NICOLLUT AV UnknM TMv.c Booking 12.1007 3710 NICOLLET A Saieiv Pero Bcoki% Iolormaiol 12.100127 202 3710NIC0LLErAV Chat she welfare Advised 12.110=1) 3710NICOU"AV Assault 3o Progress 12.153227 37IONICOUlYAV • SuspiciwnPam R4pun IT 182996 306 3710NIMAETAV AsaaltinI'Ma s Repeat Advised 12.231081 3:0 3710NICOLLETAV Domestic 12•:35927 219 ?710NICOLLLTAV Assault RcP- 0* Coned 12- 27:944 3710MCULLETAV mbctnw mua Iroavice 124132991 3710 NICUI.LF:'r AV Auempt Pick -UP 12.273107 3710NICOIA=AV )7t0N=iAF.TAV Suspicious Paso DsnapPrOPUTInrvagws Coned Information 12- 284056. 3710NICOLWTAV Domestic Advised 12. 335246 m375275 205 3710 NICOLLLrf AV Suspicious I'Mon Seat Canal 12- 378690 3710t41C0I.LETAV Unkn9vnTrouble Da"ie Ahm Report Only Report 12.3788OA 203 1710 N100I. L'1' AV 7710 NICOLLET AV Dom4ade Abuse-In Proven Advised' 12-379415 205 3710 NIC )LW AV Assauh in Progress TrospOn 13024788 - 13-093750 3710'NICOI.I.FTAV DamwsiaAbWInProgress Relimd 13.063258 / 3710 NICULLbT AV Mistellawomt Advised 134*7593 / 3710 WOLU•T AV Suspicious Vehicle 134167593 37IO NICOf.I.F.T AV Mitcdlanww 1349730 3710 NIC•OUW AV Miscdlsm0w RcPQnmwo Report Advised 13.107406 202 �f' / 3710 NICOLUTT AV Na8hb9rTr0ubk Aas�i 13.167031 153737 3710 NICOIA.F.T AV lion Assisi 13 709 3710 Nlcx LLET AV Domestic Abuso-lo Pro"" Advsod 13 729371 207 3710 HI(vi UT AV Assault m P166vess Palle 13.326182 TIIQNI(U6.FTAV Do111ary Bis • In Iko8resl 1340967_ 211 3710NK'OI.I.FrAV Domestic ScM Report 13.42:822 )710 KIMIA.RT AV (lstmmcrTroublo 13-410014 S710NICULI.hTAV PersonvfilhaGo Asa[ 31-13013143 ?710 hjtX)LL bT AV Su*ock sc Vehicle Repon 14 -031484 313 17loN1('UTA.LrrAV Taw"Troublo &hn 14.035707 7710 NICOIA.GT AV Unwamed Parson Gone o, Amval 14 -WI936 3710NirOIJ. TAV ti..c1tcdPtoon 19:031940 371UNiCOIAkTAV - UnwalaedParao Sent Oors on An3ra1 19.065052 706 3710N3C0IAFrAV Domeld0 Assault Rq=Ordy Repo 14477326 3710NICOUFrAV DomesticAbne•InPW,an Refused 14.109433 308 3710NIC01.Mr" 371UNICOU.F.TAV Domanc Abuse ReponOMY Information 14.117191 14.114559 306 3710NICOIJ.br" D0mesm Advised Report 14. 117'33 310 3710N1COI.41•TAV 'R4P°n�y All OK 14•3°_1441 306 3710NK'0IAJT. AY DDm0.sttc Ptopary,l)yrs3e/NdllRus Gone an Arrival 14.124563 3710NIWIA.ETAV Amuh m PmVvz Gone w1 Arrival 14.130269 3710NICOLLLITAV Adrisrd 14'131243 N.P. 371UNICOLIF•TAV Theft Page I nf3 pets 3700 BLOCK OF NICOU T Datdd= 4/29/201410:21: 05 PM 5112r- U141044:02AM Address 3710NICOJJ:TAV 3710NICOIJJ -TAV Problem Fs-* � llaeogePnsperty- RptOnly Disposiden Gone an Arrival Ry1on CWwB 14.140053 14456347 ApLfflr. 112113 .36 AM 3711 NI('OIJ.Fr AV Unwaned Peron - 4a86ed 12. 392650 8/1!%1 8 37.011 PM 3714 NICOLLET AV Dlmolunce Adv ud 12-037211 9/24/201211 29:16IMA 3716 NICOLLET AV Suepiaoot Person AB OR 12. 303089 5411201211.09.50AM 3717 NICOU.LT AV Properly thmax4la & Rear 'Report I: IS3S70 laria i1 12:13.04 PM 3717 NIVO Uri AV 1'wn • Report Only Report 12.34D8L S/9f3)1410.37-21IM 3717N1CULLhTAV Fight 'Transport 14•1Sirk) OIe=3 6:04:01 PM - 3719 N1C JU.LT AV Damage Peopeny -In Pm.-mn Oonr on Anival 13 181006 11/32013 11.22 10 AM 3724 NIC'OLLBT AV RuryLvy, Owing- Repro Repan 13-366260 2f2k()13 8:05.12 PM • 3725 NICOi.LF.7' AV Oeerdme•Aceidental IF.) Ripon 12. 054671 4/14/1012 8 0 6'19IM .` 3725NICOIJJTAV BrnghlyDwlag -Rep- NoSeence 12.123119 DWN )432012 1434:11 PM ' 3733 NICOLLET AV Saspktam Peneo - Orientation 12 -134622 00/3)I211k2A•33 AM 3725 NICOLI.IT AV Domestic Ali= Report Only No Savice 12. 163840 01201212.3931 PM 3725NR'OLI.E1'AV ArdoT6eR NoServtee 12. 165132 6112012 B:)SSB PM 3723 NtCOLLRT AV Bmglery Ow1ag- Ripon Repim 12. 166699 64/!0176.5.138 PM 3773 NICOIJ.TAV Ades Theo AssW )2.169209 6N2012 11.47:29 AM 3723 NICOLLBI' AV Unwanted Person Dona _on Arrival 12.176092 tips 7/10M12 &•00:70 PM 3723 NICOLL67 AV CuaomuTrou6k Sens 12.213638 7311/20124.4049PM 3715NICOlJ.RTAV BtaghryDwleg•Rq- ReprtmcnPRelwe 12414636 .7320/2012 6:59.07 PM 3725 NICOI.LET AV Ourghuy Dwing- Rep- 12.225733 8/1113012 1:31.34 PM 3725 NICOLLET AV U4mi Dwine Ia Pr93- Oook)ng 12-251840 2 8/112012 2 47.71 PM 3723 NICOI.IJ'T AV 13saglmy owing in Progress Rep- 13 251888 820012 4.58:45 PM 3725 NI('OIJ.ET AV A0a6y4 Pkk.Up Ne Service: 12. 263000 8/_'12012I.S1:32Phi 3725 NICOLLET AV OurglesyDutiesInProgress All OK 12.263YW 8/11/101: *ft. 13 AM 1725 NICOLISr AV Attmipl PICIAIp Report 12-464778 LP-MM124-54.40 PM 3725 N1('OI.U:r AV 711CI1 . Report 12. 267667 W=2012 I I IW? AM 1725 NIC'OI.Ui1' AV Suipkim. VAU. Cancel 12. 289389 WIL106125:4031PM 377SNIC'OLLRTAV Attempt Pick -tip Gone an Arrival 12. 306913 9302012 10.07 33 AM 37+3 NICOLLPr AV SsrBlary D+Mg In Proven Corm an Arrival I1- 309003 10= 1210:34.36 PM 372swiew.h'TAV Prowler; DmmmAcrivd `12.3129811 10/IS/m126:4529PM 3725NI(MULTAV Treste=inBaardcdDwell Assess 12.323351 10*MI23.33:24 PM 3725 NICOLLETAV Paghry Bk - In Progress All OR 12. 336234 3AfAI4M.26PM 372SNICOLLETAV KmTta6k Culeel 114S3652 510P.014 5:10.27 PM 3725 NIC:OUZT AV Daub aKe Gone an Arrived 14.158117 621=129 IAOAM 3726NICOLLETAV Throat _ Report 12.19= OWN 8/)2213 329:50 AM 3726 NICOIJ.RT AV Umraided Perrin Ooe`e an Arrival 13-25104. ON 8232013 4 41:23 AM 3726 NICOLLL -7 AV De mogo Properq.In Progress Report 13.231198 A/ ON wimilll_113 III AM 3728NIC'OLI.LTAV Pimply, Dumge/lib&Run Repine 120782]0 3/1120131.3206 PM 3733 NICOI.LLT AV 11th -Repen Only Report 12449026 63)2012 7.37S7 Pk1 3733 NICOLLET AV Suspkiom Pawn Sent 12.167913 3/420t36"I'M 37)6N1('OLUd7'AV Retrieve PmprpomSit"Won Releacd 17. 101529 121/20123.51:54 PM 3740NI(OI.IJTAV Then Inraraanon 12-019994 8/8201210:1244 AM 3740 NICOI.l.F:7' AV Suspicions Vehide Towed 12. 247090 8/1820121033:41 PM 3740 NIC'OLLLrT AV Suspicious Vdude Sera 12.261259 214R01112.3tk11AM )740NtMIITAV SuspiciousVeNde All OR I3. 11)2425 4f3MI)I'16:40PM 3740N1COLLETAV ReakveProp MoenSam Wn Advised 13.048761 N2113313 0.34:20 AM 3740 NICOIAXT AV Walt 11ross1 a BuBding. liaance 13.205540 12/14/2013 2:41.23 PM 3740 NIC )LET AV Customer Trouble Advised 13414213 12/14=3496:23PM 3740MICOLLLTAV Customer Trouble 13414208 I/rJ2012 16kS$S3 PM 3743 NIC'OIAXTAV Musiol'ood Advsss) 12-031175 2r -%)M12 6.57• I7 PM 3743 NICY)IJ.ET AV Domestic Abuse Report OrJY Report 12-053467 3 2164012 40136 AM 3743 NICO.I.ET AV Bur*g Susinas - Repeat Repon 12.136761 8/1120121:08:12 AM 3743 NI('OLLICI' AV Audible Buskmss Alvan Report 1 2- -5 1 562 82320129:18:44 PM 3743 NICOLLL'r AV Domestic All 09 12.266781 3 611320131&.51129AM 374)NICOIJ.F.TAV Audible Sureness Ahom Falw 13•IBS731 101121101 3 1 33 24 AM 3743 NK'OLLET AV Susp)elom Vebiele Advised I3- 338490 1 7/10201 3 8:19.43 PM 170 NIC'OI.LET AV Robbery of Pawn Asslsl 13421454 , 3/'.3/_'012 299:40 PM YUS NICOLLET AV 1W Report 12 -088901 4/11x)12 9.45:07 AM . 3745 NICOLLh' I' AV Dsmsge Properq•Rp Osdy Reptm 12.101380 315)''314 9•.17.18 AM .1745 NICOLLIT AV Rtmver No" Report W147024 42)20128.44:14 PM 3749NIL'OLIJTI'AV Unsecure Business Alt OR 12-121886 118!211113 -01 -%AM 3731NICOLLtrrAV Assault inPrelpess Togged 13416110 4 6802013 s_ts, PM 3731 NICDLLISr AV TWA -Ripon Only Repose 13.103000 V11411112S.06.19PM 1756NICOLI.F.'rAV F7lft 0-1 12-041162 7319130120,00.14I'M 37S6NtC'OLLL+TAV UnwoaledPerson San 12.151988 714.12D 12 9.11:10 PM 3756 NIC(3LIJTr AV Wdk llwugh a Balding AD OK 11406797 8/142012 8.OIC16 PM 3756 NICOLLE-r AV Mumbeecous 12.35827 32'1013 12:4797 PM 3756 NICOLLCTr AV Smi iektm Pawn Advisor) 13461408 3/142013 5:30:10 PM 3756 NIC'OLIjfr AV Umeemed Pawn Oaea on Aaival 13. 148361 7 IM134:19-34AM 3756NIC'OLIZTAV AudlbteBushMssAlarm Cmied 17.211692 &I20134:49:51-AM 17S6NIC'0IJJTAV Audible Business ALum Report 13.248380 8/1612O133:W.43PM 3756HICOLLL'IAV Threats - Advised 13.268201 12PM20139:21:01 PM 3736NI('OIJ.Ii AV Robbery ofDix NProsrm Rep- 13409067 12116n_01341801PM 3756NIC'OUJ -"rAV Audible Business Alarm 411 OR 13416380 1731620138:13:SAPM 3756NIC'OI.I.FTAV AmlbleOwu sAlum Fribi 13416646 12/1720136:0621Ahl 37561,1ICOURfAV Audible fleetness Alonn Pulse 13417089 I'JI820136:25:16AM 3756NIC'06IliTAV Audible Business Alarm False 13. 418375 IVIOP-00 11 :12•II PM 17S6NI('OLLLrI'AV Audible OminenAlarm Assist 13.420461 Pa8e2af3 3 � CIO [ a8ud IM81•Cl. NO BV crowd "aldmS AV J3TIOJIN RILE Wd CG161I 91WIllo C90[9t• ►1 Irawvue woo ul8ld AV.1.3110JIN t9LC Wv M•iAI 01OU6115 OEM PH tra!MV —+ad AV 19TI06)W TALC WV 1!'65 1 1,101%9 11, ZlIfp0• ►1 mpJ uualy aaAsa8 DrLvnv AV 331'10J!N WLC WY 90'.80:01 I'loul 14 LCelWbI "I"wt!!u! UOIMWJa!aap»y AVJ3T10JIN09LC wvu•lo'Iplorrtn 9L►ol►•[I "gall dn-• ldO-uv.. AVJ3•t'11L)IN69LC waR1,•RC•L[lumim W96[•CI 4011V 'wary am me awry AV J9T10.)IN WLC lVd CI'6C 9 CIOTMl I B&CI81 -CI lemuvaodro0 mum Paimun AV13'110JINWE WV1,0-aptlC10'MIA IKLII•LI IawaJ - J-ai0.agstv—u AV.L•1.1•IOJIN14LC wV of. Molcla 61/1, 9115601[1 tun LO" Pauraw0 AV J3'1100IN 09LE Wd D.K.2 C10&= IIZLBCO-C I uodoy aadlaid ul -219 tia1t'n0 AV.13110alN 1,9LC WY fs:MR CIO'o101r MOM( $SPA WAIV UMMS o!0!PRV AV J3T10JIN WE Wv IV-99 B E1Ou0Ul l 1,1680[•£1 - Alai Oualvaxumyal%pnv AVJ- TrIf)JIN"L( wV611611-►EIOtMCM OL'C161'LI oRM "V t8 a14pnv AVMM03INKLC IVV II mm riukU9 B[C►p0•EI Arad tayvampaoKgmv AVJ- TrIOJIN69LC wVSwo► :EIElow1r ompl-pl pgwuow60 apnpAwnalclmS AVMIMINKLC I'va WOO I I Momis L60L ►I•►1 Y011V 4a0 —i; Av11T106)IN991C Wd 9bE[OI I'IOZW; a06Et -pl No [IV iaa9.)ox4mO AVABIICAJ1N95LC WV9SIO :L11,10E/M MOKI-1,1 amrcwqul dWO-JaN-gnu AV"rIOJIN9CL► wdSWRZLHUM1.1 floba"1 K* IaauaLmSW3>s'av AVJ3T10JIN95L[ Wd65l6GB►10C192 [166!0.1,1 Iaaula aPe1nSP3lOually AV.L3;rWIN99LE WdOCS('B►IOi19JL 19LSY►-[I *40 NY vaumt?+a9 AVJ3TIW11415LC wd0E'850t[IOUI+fl -jLdlldV Ia4) ueplao&16 mal9aad a>'+PPV •w%gla0 .1 TIO0IN.40 A:)0'18 OOLf 9 131 Exhibit 4 EDINA EAST LLC c% Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis MN 55401 May 19, 2014 Via email to: Mayor Jim Hovland & Members of the Edina City Council RE: Tuesday, May 20'h' Council Meeting Proposed Redevelopment Plan — Sketch Plan Review TCF Bank Building — ( "Subject Site ") 3330 West 66" Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mayor Hovland & Members of the Council: We own the property immediately east at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building "), which we purchased from the tax - exempt American Cancer Society in 2004 and redeveloped for medical and commercial use in 2006. Both our property and the Subject Site are located within the City of Edina's prized and consistently growing Regional Medical District (the "RMD"), Significant capital was invested to re- purpose the Edina East Building by ownership and our tenants, Dermatology Specialists, PA and Peoples Bank of Commerce. The magnitude of use was increased, the property was added back to Edina's commercial property tax rolls and it is now a viable component the RMD. These efforts in 2006 were only an initial step toward realizing the full re- development potential afforded by the zoning guidelines of the RMD as part of the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan. 'The guidelines allow for up to 12 stories of height to accommodate a variety of intense uses that have synergy with the RMD's long standing anchor, Fairview Southdale Hospital and its ever expanding volume of surgery centers, medical office space, clinics, laboratories, general office and other supportive commercial uses. The district is zoned this ,way. because represents.an important part of Edina's current and future reputation as a nationally recognized top tier community with.the. ability to attract the type of uses afforded by having a thriving RMD across the street from regional mall. We oppose amending the Comprehensive Plan to allow for any non- confuming.use that will, dilute the full potential of the RMD's zoning allowances. In particular we object because the Subject Site represents a small, but centrally located primary comer on one of only two north -south arteries through the RMD (Barrie Road). Allowing for a small, Mayor Hovland Members of Edina. City Council_ May 19, 2014 Page 2 non - conforming use on a key corner could negatively affect larger re- developments that may involve assembly of parcels and/or require these corners for proper access and visibility. We further oppose as the City has an abundance of other districts where it could accommodate the proposed use where all involved could gain from its intended benefits without having to compromise the benefits of an important site within a thriving, well planned and dedicated Regional Medical District. We hope that the City can work with the developer to identify these locations and that their project can continue to move forward. very truly yours, EDINA EAST LLC Thomas M. Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members CC Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Carey Teague, Edina Community Development Director T` 7 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY & COSMETIC INSTITUTE RA Exhibit 5 NJ. ELIZABiFrH BRIDE:. NI.D.. FA AD ,Maxi t. DIRF7 Wit MELISSA WATERMAN. PA -C DENISE BARNHARD I'. PA -C - COMI'MiENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY July 18, 2014 Planning Commission Chair Kevin Staunton and Commission Members Edina Planning Commission 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Re: Planning Commission Hearing: Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project Proposal for 3330 West 66th Stmt Dear Chair Staunton and Commission Members: We are filing this letter in opposition to the Beacon Interfaith proposal for a supportive housing project for homeless teens at 3330 West 66th Street in Edina and to request an opportunity to voice our opinion at the July 23 Planning Commission .Hearing. We are writing this letter on behalf of several of the medical office property owners and tenants of the area north of 66th Street West and East of France Avenue in the City of Edina, known as the Edina Regional Medical District. We are proud to be a part of one of the premier medical office districts',in the entire State of Minnesota and, as a group and individually, we; have spent considerable resources to locate, build, and expand our businesses in this district. We hope that the City will continue to encourage this type of medical office development and °protect the investments that we have made in the community, and further attract new investments .to.the Edina Regional Medical District. In light of this, we strongly encourage the City to strengthen and protect the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District and deny any request to amend the city's comprehensive plan and rezone the property, looted at 3330 West 66th Street (formerly TCF Bank), to allow a multi - family supportive housing development. Premier Regional Medical District The Edina Regional Medical District is one of the premier medical districts in the state. The City has a history of supporting this district where medical and dental offices and dinics, ,laboratories, and other health service - related businesses can thrive. The City's commitment has helped to attract a range of health services- related businesses to the area. With every one of these . businesses comes a signMeant investment in building and staffing our offices and clinics. We attract an educated, highly -paid workforce, many of whom establish roots in the City and make, Edina their home. Our investments have, in turn, attracted further investments into the district, as other businesses seek to take advantage of the central medical office location, suitable infrastructure, and nearby. amenities. We appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the Edina Regional Medical District. CHASKA MAIN OFFICF SHAKOPEF 1 [ 1 HUNCFRTMARK ROAD #220 6525 BARRIE Roan • EDINA, MN 55435 1515 ST. FRANCIS Amu #256 CIIASKA, MN 55318 PI { SHAICOPEE, MN SS55.379 A!lE:9S2- 915.6000 FAx:952- 915 -6100 Chair and Planning Commission Members July 19, 2014 Page 2 Owmed to Comarehensive Plan Amendment/Rezonin If the proposed residential project proceeds, it would require a rezoning of the property and an amendment to change the City's policy set forth in the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We strongly oppose any change that would erode the zoning integrity of this district, negatively impact .ongoing_ investments that we have made in this medical office district, and discourage future investments in our properties and other medical offices that would otherwise locate in the community. If the Comprehensive Plan is amended to allow multifamily supportive housing residential uses, such as the proposed housing project, it would permit any type of multi- family supportive housing residential development to occur in the Edina Regional Medical District In light of the current development pressures, this slippery slope could quickly attract further multi- family supportive housing residential developments, and eventually eliminate the significance of the Edina:Regional Medical District; thus, discouraging future growth and investment in the area from the medical, industry. Anoroval Would Discourage Future Investment A rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow the proposed multi family supportive housing development would destabilize and create zoning uncertainty in the Edina Regional Medical District. The Comprehensive Plan is a policy document that we, as medical office building;owners and tenants, have'relied upon to guide and protect the integrity of the City's vision for "this,medical district. Ch, tinging the. Comprehensive Plan 'to allow, excepfions,,fa certain types of multi- family supportive housing developments in the City would have a`chilling effect on future investment in the Edina Regional, Medical District. It would send a message that thbtity has abandoned the vision of making the. area a premier. medical office center, • in favor of attracting mufti- family supportive housing developments. The prosperity of the businesses in. the Edina Regional Medical District requires confidence that encourages growth and Investment, and approving this developmentwould raise significant concerns and discourage future investment by the medical industry in the district Loss of Prooefi► Tax Base Due to Rezonina As property owners and business taxpayers in the City, we are concerned that any rezoning from commercial to low- density or supportive housing: residential properties would erode the tax base and decrease revenues for the City. The inevitable outcome would be that the deficit would fall upon us, the existing taxpayers, to makeup the difference. This would be a bad precedent. Other cities have seen.the impacts of an eroding tax base and gone to-great lengths to preserve existing businesses and business districts. We feel strongly that the City should protect the Edina Regional Medical Center District and any action to rezone a portion of this district would be the beginning of a downward trend. Moreover, there are numerous sufficient areas zoned as multi - family in the city that would allow the proposed supportive housing development to proceed without damaging the integrity of the district and the commercial tax base. We encourage the City to work with the developer to find an appropriate location already zoned and guided for such multi - family residential. development. Chair and Planning Commission Members July 19, 2014 Page 3 Detrimental Parking and Traffic Impacts of Proposed Development We also strongly oppose any development that would not meet the requirements of the City's Ordinances. As it is currently proposed, the building would nearly double in size and eliminate existing surface parking. Despite the creation of 39 new dwelling units, there would only be 25 surface parking stalls on site. The proposed parking is not nearly enough to accommodate the overflow for both the residents and visitors. This will increase traffic and, with no on- street parking in the vicinity, it will create conflict with neighboring properties, who maintain parking for customers and employees. Not a Financially Viable Cost Effective or Sustainable Protect We also believe that a $10 million project cost for 39 units of supportive housing, which comes out to $256,410 per unit or $732 per square foot per unit, will make this project unable to get financing from traditional private and public sources, and so the project will never get built. The City will have then created a significant new zoning change to allow for a supportive and multi- family housing project that will never be completed. The new zoning change will then allow any other future supportive or multi - family housing project to get built in the Edina Regional Medical District.. We strongly encourage you to strengthen the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District as a premier regional medical destination and deny any request to amend the City's comprehensive plan and zoning code to allow multifamily supportive housing residential development in the district. We have made significant investments to establish and build our businesses in this district in reliance on the City's commitment to preserving the area's medical office character. Any decision to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property for residential multi family supportive housing development would be a reversal of course and put future investment in this district in question. Sincerely, L,4 A1 I M.E. Briden, MD CEO & Medical Director Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA 6525 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952 - 915 -6000 �v JI ecBride, es A ced Skin Therap utics 6515 Barrie Road Edina, 'MN 55435 952 - 915 -6000 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY & COSMETIC irsr TvrF, P.A. August 11, 2014 Exhibit 6 NI. EUZARM BR1 DEN. M.D.. FAAD Mvnru. Morita MI:IISSA WATERMAN. RA-C DMSF. BARNHARDT. PA.0 COMPREHENSM MEDlcm, SURGICAL AND COSMETIC; DERM' ATOLOGY Cary Teague Community Development Director Edina City Hall 4801 W. 501h St Re: Proposed Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housirig Project: 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Dear Mr. Teague: Please find attached a petition with over 150+ signatures of patients and customers of our clinics, Advanced De7matology & Cosmetic Institute and Advanced Skin Therapeutics, who are in opposition to the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning of 3330 West 66th Street which is required for Beacon's proposed supportive housing project. These signatures are from patients and customers who actively come to our clinic who wish to voice their concern about placing a supportive housing developmentin�a medically zoned area right next door to our facility. These are not just random signatures from community members who are supporting a cause, who are often unaware of all the potential repercussions of the proposed rezoning. Also enclosed are 72tpostcards from our clinics' patients and customers in opposition to the proposed ,Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning. We wish to provide the Planning Commission with further information regardmg the negative economic impact and financial hardships for our clinics' business and operations which will be caused if the Beacon supportive housing proposal goes Forward. We purchased our building for $1,015,000 in 1997. We then paid'for an initial build out at $650,000 and a phase 2 build out at $350,000. Since 1997, we have paid $541,000 in property taxes on ourbuilding to Hennepin County: Thus, our total property.invwhnent within the Regional Medical District is- currently over $2.5 million. These figures do not include any furnishings or equipment.. We have been planning a proposed building renovation valued at $150,000. However, we have been forced to put this renovation on hold due to the potential re- zoning of,3330 West 66th Street We are very concerned that if this property, at such close proximity; is re -zoned to allow supportive housing in the Regional Medical District, our business will suffer due to the loss of patients and we will be unable to go forward with the addition. If the proposal continues, we CHASKA- MAIN OMCE SHAKOPEE 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 6525 BARRY Row • EDINA, MN 55435 1515 ST. FRANCU AvENVE #250 CHASKA, MN 55318 SHAxoPEE, MN 55379 No,--m:952 -915 -6000 FAx:952.915 -6100 LE August 11, 2014 Page 2 would not be able to continue to invest in the City of Mna due to economic concerns associated with such a drastic change and erosion of the Regional Medical District We are not alone in our concerns and several other neighboring landowners have also expressed concerns regaining the negative economic impact of allowing supportive housing -in the Regional Medical District If the Beacon project is allowed to proceed, the integrity of the Regional Medical District. will be impaired and future investments such as ours will be discouraged For the above reasons, we respectfWly request that you recommend denial of the proposed Comprehensive Plan went and rye- zoning required for Beacon's supportive housing proposal. In doing so, you will confirm the City's dedication to a premier medical district in the State and solidify future investments for the RegionalMedical District and City of Edina as a whole. Sincerely, 4 M.E. Bri eMn MD CEO & Medical Director cBride, dent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA Advanced Skin Therapeutics 6525 Barrie Road 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 952- 915 -6000 Enclosure �c Exhibit 7 Comprehensive Plan Amendment sus 4� Metropolitan Council May 2011 This guide was developed to streamline the comprehensive plan amendment submittal process by providing instructions and applicable guidelines and policies in one location. The comprehensive plan amendment guide and form are available in digital format online: http• / /www metrocouncil o[g/i)lannin4 /assistance /resources htm Contents Steps to Take Before Submitting an Amendment for Review ............................... .::............................ 2 ContentRequirements ............................. .............. ............................... ........................... 3 Howto Submit the Amendment .............................................. ............................... ..................... 3 ReviewTimeline ........................................................................................... ............................... 4 AdministrativeReview of Certain Plan Amendments ............................................ ..............................4 MetropoUtan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guide 1 2 Comprehensive Plan.Amendment Submittal instructions If a municipality changes any part of chapter of its comprehensive plan, it must submit the comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review. Municipalities amend their comprehensive plans for various reasons, including: • Changes resulting from Interim planning activities • Changes to a land use guiding to allow a proposed development • Routine update of a public facilities element • Text amendment to revise a policy or land use category • Route update to incorporate new Information If you need assistance about whether a comprehensive plan amendment is needed or assistance completing any part of the comprehensive plan amendment form or procedures, contact the Metropolitan Council's Sector Representative assigned to your municipality for further information. Consult the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook for detailed Information about the review criteria used once comprehensive plan amendments have been submitted for review. Steps to Take Before Submitting an Amendment for Review Before a municipality submits a comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review, it must take the following steps: • Planning Commission approval • Local governing body approval (but not final adoption) • Adjacent governmental units and affected school districts review Adjacent Review Period The municipality must allow adjacent governments, affected special districts, and affected school districts up to 60 days to review the comprehensive plan amendment. This waiting period allows interested parties to review and comment on the amendment before Metropolitan Council review. Adjacent Review Period Waiver, The Council may prescribe a shorter review and comment period for "minor plan amendments," or may waive the review and comment period if a minor plan amendment involves lands that are not contiguous to other local governmental units. A local community may waive the adjacent review and comment period for a minor plan amendment if all of the following are met 1. The amendment involves a site of 40 acres or less; 2. The amendment does not change the community's growth This comprehensive plan amendment guide and form are available in digital format online: http://www.metrocound I.org /ola nni na /assistance /resourc es.htm .Sector Reptis�ntatiues:: jftizz"w.metrou ::rnu" ` F m plannindlatsistance/s een Review' Criteria 'In the Local Planning - Handpoek: - . : . . . httg-.j/www.metrocouncii.orci/plannI n9 /LPH /LPHSect1.odf #oaae14 'tnar Plan Arrardinents :1Kirii'':: stint:. �k73.858, 5ubd. 2 Adjacent Review Waiver Criteria It Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guide 1 3 forecasts for 2010 -2030 or the TAZ allocations; and 3. The amendment site is either: a. More than one quarter (1/4) of a mile from an adjacent jurisdiction, or b. Beyond the distance or area which the community's adopted ordinances require notice to adjacent or affected property owners, whichever distance is less. A local community may also waive the adjacent review and comment ..period for a text change whose cumulative impacts meet the criteria described above. Communities should consult with Council staff to determine If an amendment is a `minor" one for which the Council might waive the review and comment by adjacent jurisdictions. Content Requirements Submit the completed comprehensive plan amendment form (a part of this guide) and the following information for each comprehensive plan amendment: 1. Color maps showing the following (8.5x11 or 11x17): a. General location of proposed changes b. Current planned land use and proposed planned land use c. Current and proposed sewer staging changes d. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System, if available 2. Staff report to planning commission or local governing body 3. Other relevant information related to the amendment How to Submit the Amendment The Metropolitan Council encourages submission of planning documents in a digital format because It reduces the number of paper copies required. To submit a comprehensive plan amendment in electronic format, mail the CD with the complete electronic document and one hard copy to the Reviews Coordinator. The Council's official review does not start until both the electronic and paper versions of the amendment materials are received and the guidelines below are followed: 1. The electronic copy is organized as one unified document. For example, "CityNameProjectCPA.pdf is acceptable versus numerous separate flies of reports, figures, and maps. 2. The CPA submittal form and any background information are included at the beginning of the electronic submittal. 3. The electronic copy and the paper copy are exactly the same. To submit paper copies only, mail the comprehensive plan amendment materials and related documents to the Metropolitan Council's Review Coordinator as follows: • Comprehensive plan amendment: Three (3) paper copies • Surface water management plan, water supply plan, comprehensive sewer plan, CA/MNRRA plans: Two (2) copies :.0 �f:�_5 ? ?,f.,iyd rr�'4:�•`.SriC'• iz.' ff`yi:? '�y. S.:E i;?;3s. Ei •'?a.. CPA Submittal Checklist • Completed CPA Submittal Form • Staff report regarding CPA • Other relevant Information related to the CPA And -the following color maps: O General'location of CPA M 'Current planned land use Q Proposed.; planned land use Wn ' Mail SUbmittais to: Reviews .Coordinator Metropolitan Council '390 North Robert Street. :St.' Paul;: MN 55101-1805 The official review process begins only after the Metropolitan Council receives the paper copies of the official submittal. At Metropolitan Council Review Timeline The timeline for review of a comprehensive plan amendment is as follows: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guide 14 •60 days prior to submitting amendment to the Council for review .Satisfaction of this requirement is one of the criteria for determining whether an applclation is complete for review •60 days upon. determination by the Council that the application is complete for review *An additional 60 days if needed *Beyond 120 days if agreed to by the municipality Administrative Review of Certain Plan Amendments The Metropolitan Council has adopted guidelines for administratively reviewing Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The Council authorized the Regional Administrator or designee to administratively review minor comprehensive plan amendments, and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) General Manager to administratively review local water management and water supply plan amendments, provided that they meet the criteria outlined below. Administrative review typically occurs 30 days after receiving a complete comprehensive plan amendment submittal. For All Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Local Water Management, and Local Water Supply Plan Amendments: The community must show that it has addressed or is committed to address through a resolution any outstanding issues with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update or other Council actions. Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendments must satisfy all of the following: 1. Meet the submittal requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act for content or be determined to be complete for review by the Council. 2. Be consistent with local applicable controls or the jurisdictions supplies evidence that the local controls will be modified to be consistent with the proposed amendment. 3. Be within 5 percent of the Council's forecasts. 4. Conform to the regional systems plans. Administrative review typically occurs 30 days after receiving a complete plan amendment submittal. The. Metropolitan C.ouncil adopted - r�tr{gib irk ;`to:`tle�Attt'i'ifriistative *: evereinc � ldelira>;s tin 3uly :2i ,. 20:10 .258.. 44' Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Guide 1 5 S. Be consistent with the MUSA guidelines if residential units are proposed. 6. Be consistent with the Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework. 7. Be consistent with the Council's housing policies. 8. Be compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. 9. If an adjacent jurisdiction is potentially impacted by the amendment, the Council has received documentation that the adjacent jurisdiction has been notified. 10. Propose a land use change of a size less than 80 acres, unless the land use change is for Agricultural Preserves enrollment. 11. Propose a land use change that will result in less than 100 housing units. 12. Or propose a land use change to guide land at no more than one unit per 40 acres to meet the requirements of the Agricultural Preserves Program (Minn. Stat. Ch. 473H) 13. Does not have the potential for a cumulative impact. Local Water Management and Local Water Supply Plan Amendments Local water management plans that are submitted as comprehensive plan amendments may be reviewed administratively If they meeting all of the following conditions: 1. The plan conforms to Council policy plans and regional systems plans. 2. The plan does not present a substantial departure from regional plans or present a substantial impact on regional systems. 3. The plan includes ordinances or refers to adopted ordinances as identified in the Council's 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan to aid in plan Implementation. 4. The plan includes all required elements of local water management plans as outlined in the 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Local water supply plans that are submitted as comprehensive plan amendments may be reviewed administratively if they meet all of the following conditions: 1. The plan is consistent with Council policy plans. 2. The plan is not proposing new wells in the Mt. Simon Hinckley aquifer. 3. The plan is not proposing interconnection with other communities as the main source of water for the community. 4. The plan is not proposing a residential gallons /capita /day of more than 100 gpcd. 5. The plan includes all required elements of a local water supply plan as outlined in the 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. 6. The community does not have any known significant contamination problems with their water supply source. If you think that the administrative review process may be appropriate for your comprehensive plan amendment, contact your Sector Representative to determine how to proceed. Exhibit R To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #k VIII. D. Froth: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: June 3, 2014 ; information 11 Subject Consider Metropolitan Council Livable Community grant award — 66 West Apartments by Beacon Action Requested:, Authorize the City Manager to acknowledge the receptivity of Metropolitan Council Livable Community Account (LCA) funding to assist the development of affordable housing potentially located at 3330 West 66th Street. Information / Background: On May 20, 2014, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative presented their concept to develop new transitional housing for formerly homeless young adults at 3330 West 66th Street (at Barrie Road). This concept requires several changes to Edina's zoning code and Comprehensive Plan. The City has made no decision about the appropriateness of the potential changes and at this time has no official position on the potential project Keeping in mind the authority of the City to either approve or deny requested changes to local ordinances and laws, the City is also aware that it can be very difficult to finance affordably- priced housing units. Such projects typically require funding from a number of different sources; and each source typically operates under unique criteria and schedules. The Metropolitan Council, through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency "Super RFP" process, makes grant funding available -for new affordable housing using their Livable Communities Account (LCA). The Super RFP is a highly: competitive funding application that is only available once per year. It can often take several application cycles before an award is made to a project New developments located In municipalities that participate in the Met Council LCA programs are eligible to receive a grant. The intention of the funding stream is to help municipalities meet their negotiated LCA housing goals. The City of Edina previously approved Resolution 2010 -71 to remain an active participant in the LCA program in order to achieve the shared goal of 138 -212 new affordably- priced housing units in Edina from 2011 to 2020. Beacon anticipates. moving forward in their pursuit of development approvals for the 3330 West 66th Street location In a, manner responsive to the comments and concerns voiced at the May 20, 2014 sketch plan review. Despite their pending zoning application, Beacon also intends to submit a Super RFP application to satisfy the June ,10,:2014 deadline. If successful, the LCA award would be one of several funding sources necessary to,satisfy- the. capital construction budget. LCA.program rules award the grant to the City of Edina who then would enter into a sub- recipient grant agreement with the ,developer. City of Edina - 4861 W. 501h St - Edina, MNr 55424 The City is requested to demonstrate its.willingness to accept an LCA grant if the application is successful. Willingness to accept an LCA grant..in no way binds the City to approve regulatory or legislative changes to accommodate the proposed transitional housing development at the proposed language. Any LCA funding award would be contingent on final land use approvals. Staff recommends that the City express its receptivity and willingness to accept LCA funds. This show of receptivity is consistent with Resolution 2010 -71 and would allow the developer to pursue site approvals and'financing commitments concurrently. In the event that the City grants regulatory approvals, concurrent efforts would expedite delivery of the finished project Attachments: LCA Receptivity to Award form Jackie Hoogenakker From: Koelmel, Dana <Dana.Koelmel @va.gov> Sent: Friday, July 18, 201412:55 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Teenage Homeless Facility Attachments: City of Edina.doc To the city of Edina, Attached is my letter regarding the proposed planning for the homeless teen shelter in Edina. If this attachment cannot be opened please let me know, I will then send the letter by postal mail. Thank you. Davia. Koh Program Support Assistant Minneapolis VA Health Care System (MVAHCS) Pharmacy Service 119 phone: 612 -467 -2040 email: Dana. Koelmela-va.pov TA 49 _ 111411!II DATE: July 18, 2014 FROM: Dana Koelmel SUBJ: Lot 2 Block 3 Southdale Acres Public Hearing Notice case file 2014.008 TO: City of Edina Planning Department My name is Dana Koelmel and I am a homeowner at the Colony of Edina 6328 Colony Way. I. have been hearing many negative responses to the proposed Interfaith Housing Collaborative and feel that homeowners and business around this area must be educated clearly about what this housing is for. My husband have been active with Urban Homeworks and habitat for humanity through our church St. John's Episcopal in Minneapolis so we are aware of the need for homes and facilities like this that are sponsored through different churches. I am not against this facility. being built because this will give the teenagers a safe place to be if they are not able to be at the home where their parents or other family members. This will give the teenager a place to call home especially if they are working. The teens need encouragement and safety to become an adult citizen. This issue is bothering me because society seems to place a cap on the word "homeless" thinking that homeless citizens pose a threat and danger to society. Rumors have been going around the complex I live in (Colony at Edina) that juvenile delinquents are going to live there and that is not true. As an employee at the Minneapolis VA Medical center we see veterans returning from their tour of duty only to become homeless and these are men and women who served our country in the military. Over the years facilities such as nursing homes and group homes have been downgraded by society and are feared by homeowners. Many years ago citizens with downs syndrome, autism and seizure disorders were sent to medical institutes and not give a chance to work and live as normal a life as possible in society. am diagnosed with seizure disorder otherwise known as Epilepsy I have been discriminated against and I feel . that is what we are doing with homeless teens. I want to see the homeless teens in a facility they feel safe with rules and regulations rather than trying to live on the streets begging for money and possibly get hooked into drugs or even gangs. I have seen several teenagers begging for money at Southdale mall. At first it startled me to see the teenagers in this southwest suburb, but it opened my eyes that homelessness is happening everywhere and we need to help. If the community could get testimonials from adults or other teens that lived in a homeless facility and explain how the shelters gave them a chance at life this could help to clear up this terrible misjudgment that so many citizens are giving this•Mcility. Sincerely, Dana Koelmel R Cary Teague From: Lynette Lamb <llamb @macalester.edu> Sent: Friday, July 25, 201412:12 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 66 West project July 25, 2014 Cary Teague Edina Community Development Director Dear Mr. Teague: I am a longtime:member of Edina Community Lutheran Church, one of the partners promoting 66 West, and I also was one of the 170 people supporting that project who came to your meeting last Wednesday night. All of us were very disappointed to be turned away that night, and to be honest it really felt like last - minute political maneuvering rather than a sincere mistake. I hope you'll prove me wrong. I am writing you today to urge your support for this proposed affordable housing development designed for 3330 W. 66th Street. Today there are many homeless young people in the southwestern suburbs, kids with`no place to go. My daughter, who attends Perpich Arts High School in Golden Valley, knows of several felloW students =some from Edina —who are living in their cars or on their friends' couches because for various 'reasons they've .been forced to leave their homes. I know there are more kids — attending, Edina, Eden Prairie, and Hopkins High School, among others —that are in the same dire situation. These kids need a safe place to live, a place where they can receive. the kind of educational and vocational support provided by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative =the nonprofit that would run 66 West. This particular location, near jobs and mass transit, is a perfect one for this small youth housing development. i Edina, as you may know, doesn't enjoy the most stellar reputation for welcoming all citizens, regardless of financial means. As the Edina community development director, I'm sure you care about the welfare of all members of your community and surrounding ones — especially the young people. I hope you and your colleagues will step up to support this important initiative in Edina. Sincerely, Lynette Lamb ...� July 27, 2014 Cary Teague Community Development Director Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50t' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Teague, Along with 170 fellow citizens who turned out in support of the 66 West Supportive Teen Housing project, I was present in the Edina Council City Chambers this past Wednesday, July 23 when it was decided to re- schedule this public hearing on the project to August 13 because of an administrative error on the City's part. I came prepared to'give testimony in support of 66 West Supportive Teen Housing project to the Edina Planning Commission. Thankfully, Planning Commission member, Susan Lee, recornmended that those of us who came prepared to give testimony in support of the project, but cannot participate at the public hearing of August 13, 2014 be given the opportunity to ensure our concerns became.part of the public record. We were asked to send our testimony to you as Edina's Director of Community Planning. The . Commission voted "yes" to this recommendation. Acting in good faith, I have enclosed my prepared testimony believing you will make this available for each City Planning Commission member to read before a vote is taken on August 13. Sincerely, Cathleen R. Godsall, LSW 5601 Johnson Dr-. Edina, Mfg 55436 Enclosure: 66 West Supportive Teen Housing Testimony from Cathleen R. Godsall Good evening members of the Edina Planning Commission, Thank you for your commitment to public service and most especially thank you for the time you have spent as you thoughtfully consider making affordable, supportive housing for homeless teens in our western suburbs a priority! While our state legislative support of this issue is reflected in the passing of a funding bill that Funnels $100 million for affordable housing to all parts of Minnesota, our local suburban community is where we all have to come together to make this a reality and make a difference in the lives of our next generation. The 66th West Apartments Supportive Dousing project focuses on teens ( 18-21 y /o) who find thennselves needing safe, affordable housing while they work and stay in school in order to become productive adult citizens. For 22 years our family has enjoyed the blessings of a living in the safe,, welcoming, educationally progressive community of Edina. I realize that my 25 and 26 y/o adulL.children would have been at a significant loss to build their- emerging professional lives without a supportive functioning family, safe housing and access to good schooling in their teen years. As a concerned neighbor, I. believe the 66th Vilest Apartments Supportive Housing project is needed and attainablel As a licensed social worker I know what a challenge affordable, accessible,. safe housing is for those 200 homeless teens in our west suburbs on any given day. Being able to help my fellow citizens enjoy the safety and comfort of a home and access to good school systems matters deeply to me. Affordable, safe housing is the foundation for keeping our communities stay vibrant and healthy! As a member of the Outreach committee at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, I have come to trust that Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative's well established record in developing affordable, supportive housing makes partnering with them the correct path to take in order to successfully provide safe, affordable, supportive teen housing in our suburbs. I ask for your support in achieving this goal and towards achieving Edina's goals of providing affordable housing. Cathleen R. Godsall, LSW 5601 Johnson Dr. Edina, MN 55436 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director City Of Edina, 4501 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Teague: was at the Planning Commission Meeting on Wednesday, July 23 and prepared to speak in favor of 66 West Apartments. Circumstances required that meeting be postponed until Wednesday, August 13. 1 am having a medical procedure August 5 and will still be in recovery and unable to attend the postponed meeting on August 13. Enclos_ ed are 10 copies of my statement that I would have read in favor of 66. West Apartments on July 23., Please forward 1 copy each to the members of the Edina Planning Commission. Thank you. William Bale, 5516 Vernon Avenue S., Edina A resident of Edina since 1960. Phone: 952- 920 -7338 i To all members of the Edina Planning Commissj July 30, 2014 From: William Bale, 5516 Vernon Avenue S, Edina, A resident of Edina since 1960. This is the statement I intended to make at the July 23 Planning Commission meeting, and am now submitting it in writing due to a medical procedure that will keep me from attending the August 13 re- scheduled hearing for 66 West Supportive Teen Housing project. Beacon Interfaith's successful plan for homeless youth is based on three components. First: a signed lease containing rules. Second: a requirement to work at a paying job and pay rent., Third: Transition counselors on site. This three part program of rules, work requirement and counseling are all designed to improve self - worth, to teach the basic aspects of money management, to create a history of steady employment, to educate as to food nutrition and hygiene and to develop confidence in one's ability to leave 66 West and strike out on his or her own. This is not a "flop- house ". This is not static storage of young people sitting around all day. This-is a dynamic operation. Beacon's three part program is so successful and dynamic at its youth apartments at 37th and Nicollet that the average stay is just 18 months. Applying that same program to 66 West, 130 young adults could graduate to the outside world during the.first 5 years of operation. So what would you calla facility that takes in homeless youth, uses a three part program to stabilize their lives, and sends them out into the world? This project is more than an apartment building. Its not a hotel, or a rooming house. It has some aspects of a prep school, but'to call it a prep school would mislead people into thinking these are fortunate youth from fortunate families. When I went to college, I had to agree to live by certain rules, I worked at a paying job to help pay the rent (it was called tuition), and I had transition counselors. Based on my experience I think this project could be called a junior college for homeless youth. A junior college offers education to those who might want to go on to college or might want to apply for certain type jobs. And I like the idea that the first junior college for homeless youth for the, suburbs will be in Edina. Please Approve This Project. Thank you. William Bale W41 Jackie Hoogenakker From: John Marshall <jmarsha1128 @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 3:37 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file 2014.008 Good morning, This relates to the recently proposal to convert the existing building at 3330 W .'66th Street into a 39 unit building to provide accommodation forfiomeless young adults. My wife and I have lived in the Colony for over twenty years and we are strongly against this proposal - a position that, we believe, is shared by other residents to whom we have spoken. Our reasons are :- 1. This project, if it were implemented, would not be a good fit for this area, given the existing buildings and businesses in the area and would be totally out of synch with its demographics and surroundings. 2. The characteristics of this area do not, in our view, provide the employment opportunities and recreational /social activities which the occupants of such a building would require or wish for. 3. We see no potential benefit to the City or its residents resulting from this kind of facility in the proposed location. 4. The proposed area is already very busy and heavily- trafficked - this proposal, if implemented, would'only serve to exacerbate an already difficult situation, 5.1 do not know what the impact of this project might be for Edina's city's budget, plus or minus. However, if this project, if approved, would almost certainly generate extra expenses to be met from our city's budget, to be set off set off against any greater ratable income, if any. This is an important factor to be considered. Whilst we have every sympathy for homeless young people and certainly support anything that might be done to improve their situation we do not think that the proposal that is being put forward is, in its currently - proposed location, in the best interests of the City of Edina, its residents in this area and for the young people themselves. Thank you for your mailing on this subject, Sincerely, John Marshall 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Gary Moses <garymari @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 2:03 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: CASE FILE: 2014:008 - REZONING OF 3330 W. 66th St., Edina, MN This in reference to the proposal to rezone the present TCF building at 3330 W. 66th Street (northeast corner of 66th and Barrie Road), Edina, MN to allow housing for young adults. I stand totally against this rezoning proposal. Why? - -I am a 70 year old woman who lives on Barrie Road, no more than a block and a half north of the proposed site. - - -I,am physically impaired, being legally blind (Renitis Pigmatosa, a degenerative eye disease, and have limited sight). While restrictive, I still enjoy_walking in what I have found to be, thus far, a safe neighborhood. - - -Most people are able to avoid areas of risk by easily detouring around them. Meanwhile,'because of my sight limitation which doesn't allow me to drive, I must walk to my destinations using more direct paths, which includes walking by the proposed site when going to local doctors appointments and Southdale. -- -When we purchased our property several years ago, we focused on a safe neighborhood... this proposal would take away a primary goal which we thought we had achieved. - -Risk must be a concern. Even what might be assumed to be moderate risk is too much for this area... There is a Montessori School right behind this proposed Young Adult Apartment. They say the Young Adult apartment will have Security Service; however, how does that helps us? - -These young adults are selected from the homeless. What level of maturity and behavior can we expect ?. Even young adults from normal, stable homes, lack the maturity that comes with age. Young, formerly homeless people living in one group ... where are the mature adults to provide necessary guidance? -- -There is likelyhood that at least some of the residents will bring to their new home other young people to live varying periods of time, people who lack the screening of the original occupants - -The people who propose this apartment do not live in the neighborhood! Should they want an apartment building for young adults, they might consider building same on the church grounds, namely Edina Community Lutheran Church at 4113 W. 54th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55424... or the property of any other church supporter. 1. Marilyn Peters, who lives here - AGAINST 2. Edina Community Lutheran Church & Beacon Interfaith Collaborative ... those that don't live here: FOR In summary, young adults housed in a group, no matter what race, color, or creed OR no matter what are meant to fulfill good intentions, simply raise too many significant risks and concerns for those of us who would be forced to live as neighbors. Signed, Marilyn L. Peters (941) 840 -4034 P.S. I will attend the hearing and would like to give testimony AGAINST the proposal. y; i y� MS. d10lla EBtufl1Cll -� 6450 York Ave. S Apt 309 Edina, MN 55435 C) Nit, � -V4 - Q M3. Duna Hiltwten 6450 York Ave: S Apt. 309 `Edina, M1V 55435 �� 1 Marilyn L. Peters Barrie Road, Edina, Mn. 55435 Cell: (941) 840 -4034 CASE FILE: 2014:008 -- Rezoning of 3330 W. 66t' Street, Edina, MN This is in reference to the proposal to rezone the present. TCF building at 3330 W. 66th Street (northeast corner of 66th and Barrie Road), Edina, MN to. allow housing for young adults. I stared totally against this rezoning proposal. Why? - - -I am a 70 year old woman who lives on Barrie Road, no more than a block and a half north of the proposed site. - -I am physically impaired, being legally blind (Renitis. Pigmatosa, a degenerative eye disease, and have limited sight). While restrictive, I still erijoy walking in what I have found to be, thus far, a safe neighborhood. -- -Most people are able to avoid areas of risk by easily detouring around them. Meanwhile, because of my sight limitation which doesn't allow me to drive, I must walk to my destinations using more direct paths, which includes walking by the proposed site when going to local doctors appointments and Southdale. - --When we purchased our property several years ago, we focused on a safe neighborhood.... this proposal would take away a primary goal which we thought we had achieved. - -Risk must be a concern. Even what might be assumed to be moderate risk is too much for this area... There is a Montessori School right behind this proposed Young Adult Apartment. They say the Young Adult apartment will have Security Service; however, how does that helps us? -- -These young adults are selected from the homeless. What level of maturity and behavior can we expect? Even young adults from normal, stable homes, lack the maturity that comes with age. Young, formerly homeless people living in one group ... where are the mature adults to provide . necessary guidance? - -There is likelihood that at least some of the residents will bring to their new home other young people to live varying periods of time, .people who lack the screening of the original occupants. - - -The people who propose this apartment do not live in the neighborhood! Should they want an apartment building for young adults, they might consider building same on the church grounds, namely Edina Community Lutheran Church at 4113 W. 54th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55424... or the property of any other church supporter. OR 1. Marilyn Peters, who lives here - AGAINST 2. Edina Community Lutheran Church & Beacon Interfaith Collaborative... those that don't live here: FOR In summary, young adults housed in a group, no matter what race, color, or creed OR no matter what are meant to fulfill good intentions, simply raise too many significant risks and concerns for those of us who would be forced to live as neighbors. Signed, r Marilyn L. Peters (941) 540 -4034 P.S. I will attend the hearing and would like to give testimony AGAINST the proposal. - -. . 74, vn - - J-17....-i - .- .fir ._. 19 �� Jackie Hoogenakker From: Aase May <aasem @earthlink.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 06,,2014 7:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: rezoning 3330 W 66th st Hi, I am wondering if there will be any supervision on a regular and.long term basis. We are talking of young, formerly homeless people with probably for the most:part very little experience in how to live in and take care of an apartment. I have done a bit of rental, and it is surprising how ignorant a lot of people are in taking care of a place, even how to change a light bulb. So, unless there is supervision, I am against it. If well run, it is a nice idea that might workout Aase May 6421 Colony Way 2B 1 LN Jackie. Hoogenakker From: Joel Stegner <joel.r.stegner @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 7:41 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 3430 West 66th Street property I have read a lot about the need for transitional housing for young adults and think the "proposal would be an ideal location for such a property. The block north of 66th between York /Xerxes is commercial, and this kind of group housing would fit nicely. It is just across the street.from Southdale Shopping Center, close 'to grocery stores, pharmacies and Target and well placed near east west bus and an express bus to downtown, which means residents without a.reliable car could easily get downtown or jto obs in the Southdale'area. This group is likely to more healthcare needs than average young adults, with the many services available within walking distance. I walk to virtually all-my appointments, and find it very convenient. I would anticipate some will object out of fear to the idea of having young previously. homeless adults in their neighborhood claiming some potential impact on housing values. I really don't think residents of this facility will have much reason to venture into the neighborhood. Frankly, it is better for Edina to cultivate an image of being accepting of economic diversity, to break the old cake eater image. This project would never be accepted in a high income residential neighborhood, but it works perfectly for the location it is proposed to be located. Joel Stegner 6312 Barrie Road 1C, Edina, MN 55435 i I Jackie -Hoogenakker From: Georgia Kaiser <georgiakaiser @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August.05, 201411:30 AM. To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 3330 West 66th St, Edina 0 Re: Rezoning for Beacon Interfaith housing I am totally in favor of the rezoning of 3330 W. 66th St for. 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults who have experienced homelessness. Georgia Kaiser i Jackie Hoogenakkea' From: Phyllis Seichrist, <phyllis.seichrist @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 04, 201410:49 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker .Subject: planning dept am in support of allowing housing for young homeless adults. There are those in my building who are apprehensive but frankly they are apprehensive about many things. I live at 6450 York Ave. i r .. BOARD OF DIRECTORS SAN ASATO BRAD BEARD BERNIE BEAVER PETER DAHL RON ERHARDT SCOT HOUSH JAMES HOVLAND =EVEN MCDONALD STRENGTHENING O U R C O M M U N I T Y Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: 66 West Apartments Dear Commission Members: August 1, 2014 We are writing on behalf of the Edina 'Challenge Team to request your approval of the request by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and Edina Community Lutheran Church for supportive housing for youth and young adults at West 661h Street in Edina. The Edina Challenge is an initiative of the Edina Community Foundation that involves collaboration among the following community organizations and grant - makers working together to maximize our collective effectiveness in enabling youth in poverty to participate in the community, educational, and recreational programs that lead to success in adult life: PAUL MOOTY Connecting With Kids Edina Community Foundation RICHARD O LS O N Edina Community Lutheran Church Edina Education Fund Edina GiveAndGo Edina Morningside Rotary Club BRENDA QUAYE Edina Park & Recreation Department Edina Public Schools EPS Community Education Services Edina Resource Center MAMIE SEGALL Oasis for Youth Questscope /One20ne MAXINE WALLIN Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church Southdale YMCA This Edina Challenge Team identified housing as one of the. top. five priorities for EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR helping Edina youth in need develop to be healthy, productive adults, and it has DICK C ROC KETT endorsed this initiative as an important step toward that goal. We request your approval of this project and look forward to having the community DEVELOPMENT OFFICER benefit from the initiative by these organizations to meet the needs of homeless youth MARSHA BUCHOK in our community. Sincerely, Dick Crockett Executive Director Mamie Segall Edina Challenge Chair 5280 GRANDVIEW SQUARE , EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 • (952) 833 -9573 • FAX: (952) 833 -9575 edfoundation @ci.edina.mn.us www .edinacommunityfoundation.org Jackie Ho ogenakker From: Ruth <ruth @ruthlordan.com> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 201410:29 AM To: Jackie, Hoogenakker Subject: 2014.008 Thank you for reading this. As a senior citizen who has lived 16 years in the vicinity of the proposed Beacon Interfaith housing Collaborative I am extremely upset at having this project in my proximity. I am unable to attend the meeting as I work evenings..First,.this is within walking distance of my-home and that raises major security issues in and of itself. Even if these young-adults mean to live right, we,are all human and they can make mistakes. I cannot afford robbery, at this time in my life. Second, I have read and studied the Churches website. These are well meaning but naive people „from the laid off General Mills exec to the failed rock star musical director. I get it that they need to make a living and a life -we all do, and this is a noble, well meaning pursuit, but these people do not know what they are getting into. ,Faith is fine - house them next to you and have faith that they will not endanger your safety. I am not even addressing the effect on property values. I will have to install much better security at a significant cost to me and significantly .up.my insurance -who will pay for that? And,:what will this do to insurance rates - obviously raise theml.Unlike these well meaning church folk, I grew up in a tough location and understand what troubled youth go thru from first hand exposure.. Will there be competent supervision? And by competent I mean,people who do not get fooled by their belief-in the goodness of all mankind and people trained specifically in the justice system. "Jesus ain't gonna fix this” -if that worked Israel would not have the turmoil it has today., Will my taxes have to pay for that? how about drug testing and weapons checks? There are good and bad acting people in all social strata and demographic categories, but this is extremely high risk and inviting trouble.. I hope I am wrong, but experience telis me I am right. Sincerely, Ruth Lordan..... ®® Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West Fifty- Fourth Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1432 Phone: 952.926.3808 ® Fax: 952.920.441$ www.eci,c.org June 2, 2014 Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative 2610 University Avenue West, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 Dear Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, The congregation of Edina Community Lutheran Church is grateful for our strong partnership as we Work together to create housing for homeless youth in the southwest suburbs. Over the past several years, our congregation has grown increasingly passionate about meeting the growing need to Provide safe, stable housing for youth on their own. As a community of faith, we believe that all Children of God deserve a safe, stable place to call their own. We believe 66 West Apartments at 3330 W. 66" Street in Edina could become exactly that place. Founded in 1948, Edina Community'Lutheran Church (ECK) is an open, energetic and inclusive congregation of over 750 members with an historical emphasis on social justice. ECLC is a community that has discerned a mission to respond to God's call for justice. We believe that to follow this mission, we must be advgcates for everyone in our community, especially for the most vulnerable. Today, this congregation is proud to work with you financially through a significant gift of $80,000 from our Capital Campaign, with the significant time and energy of our Housing Task Force and staff, through advocacy to our civic leaders, and through educating our community about the need for this housing. We are committed to remaining strong partners once residents move in as well. We believe 3330 W. 66th Street in Edina is an ideal location for supportive housing for youth and looking forward to obtaining the necessary funding to create housing that changes lives there. Sincerely, Lauren Morse- Wendt, Diaconal Minister The Rev. Erik Strand, Pas �,,R; ID t i Richfield United Methodist Church MayorArn Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 W: 5P Street Edina, MN 554m \ The Honorable Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of lifta City Council, On behalf of Richfield United Methoodist Church we write in support of the developmeritat 3330 West 66th Street. Having Ipokea into the issue of homeless youti'in tho metro, we feel strongly that providing safe and appropriate housing four young adults and youth is a critical neefl. Richfield UMC has active members who live in Richfield; Edina; South Minnespotis and numerous :suburbs in the Southwost metro area. We have long been engaged in justice issues on behalf of those in need. Vile were one of the orjglnai twelve congregations who carne together to create Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People. Richfield has been in partnership with Beacon for some fine now, and we feel blessed to be in community with Edina Community Church and other faith compriunifles who are committed to the creation of communities in which all people have access to the most basic of human needs. Surely our youth and young adults need safe and affordable places in which to live and create a future. We ask that you support the project and write to let you know that we stand.as community partners with you as you move-into this exciting and innovative project to enhance the lives of young people in our area. Thank you for your support. Si ely, .0 Rev. Elizabeth Macaulay Lead Pastor Sue Restemayer, Administrative Council Chair Pastor: Elizabeth Macaulay 5835 Lyndale Ave. South - Minneapolis, MN 55419 Phone: (612) 861 -6086 o Fax: (612) 861 -6332 - E -mail: RUM CQrichfieldumc.ora 9 A (fk.wol L S�oeB June 6, 2014 Commissioner Mary Tingerthal Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Commissioner Tingerthal, 5421 France Avenue.South Edina, MN 55410 Mark Sliockey, SenlorPastor Norm Ruthenbeck, WAT0tlon. Pastor Faith Rattef CgrlimunityOutreach Director Tosca Gr/mm, Early Childhood Director AmySolie, Assistant Early Eirildhovd Director Jean Mattel Mln1stry Operations Director Joan Harper, Hospitality Coordinator St. Peter's is a congregation that has served Edina since 1929. Being on a bus route; we see a Mir number of homeless individuals who stop io for assistance. We see the need. Homelessness affects h6t just adults but a growing number of youth as well. Through the years we have been involved with Source, another ministry that works with youth homeless in Minneapolis and are thrilled with their success. Now we have an opportunity to meet that need locally and hopefully help keep young people from the grip of human trafficking and drug marketing: I'm writing to express support for the advance work and proposal of the 66 West Apartments project in Edina by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. Beacon has'successfully developing affordable housing. The Edina area would, be a great setting since so many opportunities- and partnerships exist in the Southdale area including transportation and jobs. The community is very supportive of those who are troubled in our midst and'new efforts have increased our ability to provide more services to homeless youth to make sure their future is promising. Support from Minnesota Housing would help to provide a supportive housing development for homeless youth in Edina and urge you to assist Beacon in any way possible to make this a reality in our community. Our congregation stands ready to help as we are able. Thank you fqr your service to Minnesota, CJames Ravell t ent o� Cn� t 6 www.stpetersedinaorg o info @stpetersedina.org o Phone: 952.927 8400 o Fax. • 952.926.6545 114inatity,Council 4801 W. SO' Street Edina, MN 55424 RE; Yes to 66 West AB May 15, 2014 Dear Council Members, We are writing on behalf of the social Justice Commission of the Church of St. Pafrick in Edina to express our Qnthuslastic support for the 66 West Apartments, project. The mission of our Social Justice Commission is to act-with and through St. Pat rick's..parishloners to conduct-various outreach ministries that directly support the poor and disadvantaged in our soclety and to engage in advocacy in support of initiatives that will provide pathways out of poverty or otherwise athleve the common good. in the course of our work, we have become increasingly aware of the extent of homelessness in our community and of the tremendous. social cost that attends this issue. Having heard a bit about an effort to address the growing numbers of homeless youth in Edina and the western suburbs, we met as a Commission with representatives of Beacon interfaith Housing Collaboration and Edina Lutheran community Church to learn more about the fib West Apartments project and to address a number of questions and concerns we had. We'emerged from that meeting very impressed with the, careful thought that has gone into this planned housing project and the services to be provided to residents to help them move beyond their current circumstances to become valued, contributing members of the community. We heartily endorse this project for Edina and hope that you will support it. This presents a great. opportunity for the City of Edina to exercise leadership on the issue of youth homelessness and to help to remedy its consequences for the community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, - Pr. Tim Rudol 'I Pastor Cc: MayorJim Hovland O> rto of 0aint Patti 6820 Saint Patrick's Lane Edina, Minnesota 55439 -1631 Phone.952 =941 -3164 Fax 952 - 941 -7371 May 16, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 W: 60th Si. Edina, MN 55424 The Honorable Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council, As you Weil know, Colonial Church of Edina recently spearheaded a building project of our own; The Waters of Edina. l am writing to share from that experience and how it has strengthened our support for the development of youth housing at 3330 West 66th Street. Colonial Church knows first hand there are obstacles in bringing .a housing project to fruition and we were deeply disappointed we weren't able to negotiate for more affordable units for Edina's seniors living in The Waters. The 66 West Apartments are an opportunity to provide housing for Edina's youth and it is a project that Colonial Church wholehearted supports. While it may be easy in Edina to not notice youth homelessness, once you become aware of the issue, it becomes impossible not to want to provide a solution. Providing a solution requires a strong partner, and this project has that in the Beacon Interfaith Housino'Collaborative. Colonial Church has a long I and deep relationship with-Beacon and can speak for their professionalism, dedication, and expertise in affordable housing. A person only has to tour one of their many successful projects — particularly the Nicoliet Square site — and it is evident that the 66 West Apartments will be a positive addition to the Edina community. Despite the past challenges, most people now believe The Waters is an incredible asset to our community. As the inevitable challenges arise with the 66 West Apartments, I encourage you to stand strong and do the right thing, which Is to provide Edina's homeless youth with safe and professionally managed housing on a site that also gives them access to much - needed jobs and transportation. Thank you so much for considering this important project. Respectfully, Vizce` i - 7 Brian Jones Minister of Mis , Colonial Church of Edina 952.925.2711 6200 COLONIAL WAY I EDINA, MINNESOTA 65436 PHONE ADDRESS 1W. COLON IAL .QkId k0A t From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 05/06/2014 12:21 #131 P.001/009 May 5, 2014 The Honorable Ani Hovland, Mayor of.the City of Edina Ms. Jonl Bennet, Edina City Council, Member Ms, Mary Brindle, Edina City CounclLmetnber Mr. Josh Sprague, Edina City Council Member Ms. Ann Swenson, Edina City Council Member 4801 West 50.th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE; 66 West Apartments EPISCOPAL CHURCH SCAlPiUA4 mwmuN kEtsoN On behalf of parishioners at St. Stephens Episcopal Church in Edina, I am writing to express support for the proposed 66 West Apartments, Which will provide much- needed affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. Our congregation rec0tly started an intentional journey to better understand the Issue of youth homelessness and its root causes in our own neighborhood. We learned that youth homelessness is largely invisible in the suburbs. Yet; teachers, high school counselors, school board members, librarlans, YMCA staff, and drop -in center volunteers serving homeless youth from Edina and surrounding suburbs know this issue well and have made us aware of this pressing need. Edina has the resources and community'passlon to.create a network of support that will launch these young people into successful futures. The location in the Southdale area will provide youth safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We have partnered with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative to mentor families facing - ,homelessness. We know the professionalism of Beacon's staff and the organization's commitment and 'expertise in developing supportive housing that will be an asset to our community. The issue of youth homelessness In our neighborhood has quickly captured the hearts of many members of St. Stephen's, as evidenced by the signed petition attached. We urge you to work with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the project proposed 66 West Apartments. 6Re ek you for your support, v. . Rena Turnham Deacon, St Stephen's Episcopal Church -Edina Deepening our faith and 4439 West 50th Street is Edina, MN 55424 bringing others to Christ (952) 920 -0595 P wwwststephens.com From:-ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 05/06/2014 12:22 #131 P.0021009 April, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4891 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 We are parishioners at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. We are signing this petition to express support for the proposed development of 66 West Apartments to provide much- tieedO affordable housing for homelessyputh and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have become aware that youth homelessness is largely invisible in thesuburbs, yet thete is'a pressing need to address this issue. Edina has the resources and. community passionta create a network of support that will Iaun..ch these young people into successful futures. The location in'the S6uthdale areaavlll:provideyuuth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West cVt���jC r �1yeR ♦ail :� I r r r r From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 April, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 554.24 05/06/2014 12:23 #131 P.003/009 We are parishioners at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. We are signing -this petition to express support for the proposed development of 66 West Apartments to provide muchkneeded affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have become aware that youth homelessness is largely invisible in the suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this issue. Edina has the resources and community passion to create a network of support that will launch these young people into successful futures. The location In the Southdale area will provide youth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West Apartments. C, r 7. i, f ' frovST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 April, 2014. Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 05/06/2014 12:23 M1 P.0041009 We are parishioners at St: Stephen's Episcopal Church it Edina. We are signing this petition to express support for the proposed development of 66 West Apartments to provide much = needed affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have becoMe aware that youth homelessness is. largely Invisible in the suburbs, .yet there is a pressing need to address this issue: Edina has the resources and community passion to create a network of,support that will launch these young people into successful futures. The location in the Southdale area will provide youth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon Interfaith Housing:Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West Apartments. A d, �//j /' f134 a?- 1, �- A Its From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 April, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4802 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 05/06/2014 12:23 #131 P.0031009 We are parishioners at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. We are:signingthis petition to 0Xpress support for the proposed .development of 66 West Apartments to provide much - ,needed affordable housing for homeless youth and yourig adults in tfie southwest suburbs. We have become aware that youth homelessness is largely ihvisibie inthe suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this issue. Edina has the resources and community passion to create a network of support -that will launch these young people into successful futures. The location in the South.dale area will provide youth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employees, and 'Multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work.with Beacon interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West Apartments. 4� 1 E� 8 ne .df�Y From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 April, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 05/06/2014 12:23 #131 P.004 /009 We are parishioners at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. We are signing this petition to express support for the proposed development of 66 West Apartments to provide much- needed affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have becofne aWare. that youth homelessness is.largely invisible in the suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this issue: Edina has the resources and community passion to create a network of support that will launch these young people Into successful futures. The location in the Southdale area will provide youth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West Apartments. A e U 45 1. e r From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 April, 3014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 0510612014 12:24 #131 P.0051009 We are parishioners.at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina, We are signing this petition to express support for the proposed development of 66 West Apartments to provide much - needed affordable hogs lhgfor homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have become aware that youth homelessness is largely invisible in the suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this issue. Edina has the resources and community passion to create a network of support that will launch these young people into successful futures. The location in the Southdale area will provide youth With safe housing, access to first jots with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with 9eacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed. 6.6 West Apartments. NA4 . _,P_Vq " From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH April, 2014 9529201929 Mayor Jim Hoviarid and Members of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 05/06/2014 12:24 #131 P.006f;009 We are parishioners at St.. Stephen's Episcopal Church in £Mina. We are signing this petition to express support for the proposed developmr nt of 66 West Apartments to provide much - needed affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have become eware that youth homelessness is largely invisible in the suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this Issue. Edina has the resourcesand comimuriity passion to create a network of support that will . launch these young people into successful futures. The location In the Southdale area will provide youth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers; and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and a.pprave the proposed 66 West Apartments: l 061114,6 xwotl�m 46"'": Ptvv"-fl- otA ��� From:ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 05/06/2014 12:25 #131 P.007 /009 April, 2014. Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 We are. parishioners at St, Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. We are signing this petition to express support for the proposed development of 66 West Apartments to provide much - needed affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults inthe southwest suburbs. We have become aware that youth homelessness is largely invisible In the suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this Issue. Edina has the. resources and community passion to create .a network of support that will. launch these young people into sudcessful futures. The location in the Southdale area will provide youth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon Interfaith .Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West Apartments. ice, L. e I.-o„. L51 I 9 LkA. C From:ST STEPHEN EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 April, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edina City.Council 4801 West 50th Street Edirta, MN 55424 05/0612014 12:25 #131 P.000909. We are parishioners at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, in Edina. We are signing this petitio.n'to ekpress support for the;proposed :development of 66 West Apartments to provide much- needed affordable housing for homeless youth and young adults in the southwest suburbs. We have become aware that.youth homelessness is largely invisible in the suburbs, yet there is a pressing need to address this issue, Edina -has the resources and community passion to ereate•a network of support that will launch these young people Into successful futures. The location. in the Southdale area will provideyouth with safe h, ousfng, .aceess to 4ira jobs with many employers, and multiple means of'public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacom interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West .Apartments. N rill From'-"ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 9529201929 05/06/2014 12126 #131 P.009/009 April, 2014 Mayor Jim Hovland and Members of Edine. City Council 4841 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 We are parishioners at.St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Edina. We are signing this petitlan to express support for the proposed de v. elopWignt of 66 West Ap4ttroo6ts to provide much - needed affordable housing for Homeless youth and yo%--jng adults in the southwest suburbs. We have become aware that youth homelessness is largely invisible In the suburbs;.yet there is a pressing need to address this issue. Edina has the resources:and community passion to create a network of support that will launch these young people into successful futures. The location in the Southdole.area will provideyouth with safe housing, access to first jobs with many employers, and multiple means of public transportation. We urge you to work with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and approve the proposed 66 West Apartments. ,. r Y 1 r �y ell, f S 5�,:. 1, Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it i's estimated that Between 200 and 306 youth ace homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County, 66 West is affordable and. supportive housing which will serve approximately' 39 youth and young adults. Please help sub"an youth experiencing homelessness }iy supporting this project. Z Sincerely, Address :<d '7 5- Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing tivbich will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name GG Address °7 Zoo /G i2%. , A V Z . -m-l&O2-:- Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 9gs I. postage required n x.49 Hostage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The .city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Tlrt( " "Mv :1U61 Sincerely, Name } 't � x;1/1 VI (j.� �t i � ` � �, F i ��$A..��:� , Address .6i Lq V(S Vy. . GY1 N i Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help .suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, 1 Name `�`� A' 51-� Qh c� Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 Vilest 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 �IN ;49 postage required sqg postage required Al uo ��i a o• �s d r s Dear Edina City Councihnember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth And young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting-this project. Sincerely, Name . 01 ROWOL4 Address CAIna/ MN 5546 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name P�.v Address 1-.( `7 O R 1JL e v✓ i - �-&.0 Q Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Sheet Edina, MN 554,24 Edina City Council` . 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 a a %" P - v -- �.� N °.49 postage required 6,49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember5 The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing' Which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburbad youth experiencing Homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, j� Name I &M Address 2 � �� � (9 (9 "2 Dear Edina City Councilmember; The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. on any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth, are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Edina City Council 4801 West -50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina n Erb ,ors ° ;.49 ppstage required 5.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmembor, The city of Edina 0an h0p young people find stable housing ELqd end homelessness. On any given night, -it n ght,,# is estimated that between 200 and 300you .youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin C - ounty. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please. help sulbrurlban youth experiencing homelessness by supp o*rtin pr9jec t & . Pee I'% r-q, e. 'I ex Of Eatr Iva f%r-i's V ef SincerNly, al (AM coat �..e tv.LM 'vI here - R Ir Name KICAIM-1 &I PDULS�q Address /18 7 t Ave - S, N De IZ AS MM SS 3 y3 -7 6Sq Dear Edina City CouncilmeMbet The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the Subiu-b5 of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban Youth exPeldeneing homelessness by supporting AAs 'ect. pro) Sincerely, Name 4. VA Address Edina City C-QuOpill 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th--Street Edina, MN 55424 0E. �("Ie t J t. zuvxra USA I forever s49 postage required Dear Edina City Couucihnember, The city of Edina .can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given nigbtit is estimated that between 20:0 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, r 1� n ,, ,� Name V/ V ,Address �5� J � �Jo v�N Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth axe homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sing rely, Name -PM &U a-eje `{" Y Address It�it���r lq1 &-di/)�l RA) 'J�57 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 . Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 L'I L.y 11 °.49 postage required n CALMMULA USA Iforever Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given tight, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults �t Please help suburban youth experiencing (J Homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 1/ o Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelles}spne�s�Js/ by supporting this project. 7incerely,1z22e. Name C� '� e Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina; MN 55424 e,�yg I postage, lequired I I 9.49 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street _ Edina, MN 5542 dU L Dear Edina City. Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estim4tod that between 200 and 300 youth are homeiesiq in the suburbs of Ueni•►epin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please lielp suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name J 2 Address < 17 �� G x' Dear Edina City Councilmeiuber, Vt The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 360 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please Help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, �f2 Name Q Address '083A Ea,,A✓a) *'V 53-3/3 J Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55A-24 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 CC L 1 $40 posteao tequire4 s.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councihnemberi postage required The city of Edina can help young. people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given nigbt; it is estimated that between 200 apd 30Q youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin, County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please. help s-ubtiuban youth experiencing ' ,homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name: (2- .c Edina; MN 55424 �. Address�� ' Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, , Edina City Counc�l � , 4801 -� Name � t � Edina, Address s49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city. of Edina can help youi.ig.people find stable housing and end homelessness. Or► any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 360 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin Coutity. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approxmately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name -' � Edina, MN 55424 Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin . County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing . which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name (i, h �r5`�� (?�.t �eand vs Address L�d0 J'I ln a,-/'C L Dr tl G Eck,,) 6z 1'n rl l ) Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 _ �m U9 postage required 5.49 postage required Dear Edina City Couincilmembei, The city I y of Ediwoaa' help young pe9ple'find stable housing and end homelessness. On , any given night, it-is estimat68 thatb.etween.2'00 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 Vest is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 YQnth and Young adults- Please help sulwhan xP youth experiencing homelessness by s4pportW9 this project: Sincerely, Name Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage inquired 5.49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessneds. On any given.night, it ie estimated that between 200 and 360 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 *b9t is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approidmady 39 youth and young adults. Please- help g4urban youth experiencing vo hoinelesoness by, supporting this projecti, 10 '1r Sincerely, E y Co 4801 West 50t tre Name Edina, MN 554 AJ XVI Address 9.49 Dear Edina City Councihnember, Postage re4pIred The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and .end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and-300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepizr County. fib West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. / Sincerely Edina Cit y Council 4001 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address 9.48 Dear Edina City Councilmember, Postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424��`���' Dear Edina City Councilmabber, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that .between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive- housing wbjrh'will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban yotLdi p"erleacing h6 esisness b supporting this project, Z Z3 Name C74 AddresaJ�' �d Dear Edina City Councilmembor, The city of Edina can help young people fiftd stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address qI bq No V( Edina City Council' 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4901 West 50th-Street CIO Edina, MN 55424 PAO 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina pan help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is. affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults: Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness- by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Ce ( Address�� (, �c 1, �l Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable. and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, 100, 7k,m f,aY, Name Address 0�-�n rf`���� Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina-City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 qtr % 5.49 postage reg�rrea 6.49 postago regdtred Dear Edina City Councihnember, The city, of Edina cao help young people find stable housing and end Homelessness. On any eviqn night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West' is affordable and supportive'housing. which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness lby supportingibis project. Sincerely, Name Address Y7 3 a Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can Help young people find stable housing and end homelessness; On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban yon nih?expeizencing homelessness by supporting!M& project. Sincerely, Name Address 1 . /t. 6� N Edina City Council 4,801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 " c 1r;, ;,3 $A9 postage required r $.49 posca�e tequitesl Deax Edina City Councihnember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County 65 West is affo> dable and supportive hoiis' which will serve approximately 39 youth and ygg adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppor&g this project. Sincerely, Name rt�� i Address 6-11 1- '� VZS. Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. bb West is affordable and suppoi.�tivo housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, ; -- -," Name/// tr3 Address n AIN 59 0 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage required .I '.49 postage required Edina City Council t `� 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424�,� 1il- The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. on any given night, it is estimated.that between20U and, 300 youth are homeless in the.suburbs of Hennepin , County. 66 West is affordable and suppol dye housing . whi&will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults, Please help suburban youth experiencing hoomelgssness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City. Council 4801 West 50th Street Name �j 1/-C �?% Edina, MN 55424 Address Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless.in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this, project. Sincerely, 1' a Name Address nw _ n Al s 4s postege required k48 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 5001 Street Edina, MN 55424 VI -V 1A \ „y Dear Edina, . City Councilmembei, The city of E&a can help young people find stable housing" and end Homelessness: On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and -300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County, 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately. 39 youth and you. fig adults, Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppoiLling,thiproject. r , Sincerely, Name "�Y"" it /l.a — Ley" Address ' /2-- (.tJ Dear- Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On anygiven night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name VC) Address d q cN1 V-� 5.1 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 %49 postage required 5.48 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 5542, q . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help }young people find stable hopsing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County.. 66 West is affordable and suppoi'iive housing which wall serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help submbau youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project: Sincerely, Name1Wt�� 1 Address 7 VZ S3 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County: 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please Help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name s �� (/U l f e exx - Address 60� �L,,c, A 3 i� 4- Z - 92-7 -6° `7 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 554,24,",V=.0 env 'we TO OIX •_ r' $.49 postage required I �J x.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On atiy given night, it is estimated that between.200 and 300 youth are homeless hi the suburbs of Hennepin County. 06 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing howelessriess by supporting this project. ,r t f� Since -, �, Name I AU �r1 Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Edina City Council W1 West 50th Street Edits, MN 55424 Ly 5.49 postage requiPed 5.49 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 sys,* B w 0XI JA o y r. •'t ,y � 1 5.49 Dear Edina City Councibnember, po 9a. requiied The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night,.it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 Wiest is affordable and supportive housing which, will serve 4pproxanately 39 youth and -young adults. Please help. sg6burbau -youth experiencing homelessness Iy supporhug this projeeL Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50.th Street Name f .�o- 1r.r+2i - Edna, MN 55424 Addi-ess 5.48 Dear Edina City Councilmembe, posse required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youdft experiencing homelessness by suppoilhig this project. Sincere, r Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street %�•� �'�!W'YV• R.tf - Narne .1 ' Edina, MN 55424 .. ,..a� Address 71� Dear. Ei dina City Council member, The city of Edina can help young people faid stable housing and end homelesmess. On any given night, it is estimated that.bdhyeen 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the s6b.urbs,,of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth exImdencing homelessness by supporting this project. A . . . ';�e - W^". X"V - Iq O�9 a�j a . ente, Name &owu 907v? &'h l Address .1041.01 a NW 91Z -, A2 V A IN A� &"'k Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County: 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve, approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 West 501 Street Edina, MN 55424 Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this pro qr.—.- 6 ^ t5v Sincerely, Edina City'Cdunu 4801 West 56th Street Name � Address Edina, MN 55424 postage required s A9 postage requited '8,49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, noscase requ[red The, city of Edina cair help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On anygiven night; it is ;estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Remiepin County. 66 West 3s affordable and suppoilive housing which will serve approximately N youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing . homelessness by suppo rting. this project. ncerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address Aw 16(a 9 849 Dear Edina City Councibnember, p °5t�9a r°quired The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, . Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street h Name Edina, MN 55424 A. 1� T Addres 1 'I, i Y• Dear Edina City Councihnember, Nei tr(1wr . �_ postage required %i2 c*r'it,��1l ICJ The city of Edina can help young people �le� Housing and end homelessness.: On any given night, it is estimated that betwedfi 200 cr R and 300 youth are homeless in the stzliuibs iof HennepinZ ' County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing 'd.yyzu -� which will serve approximately 39 youth and yomig a Its: ,./' ka� Please help suburban youtli experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name )ate C()OAJ Address S.& Dear Edina City Councihuember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth . are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburbant youth experienemg homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 22.•wv 6IZ Edina .City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council N ,a OV 4801 West 50th Street a I Ok Edina, NN 55424 S l 1i3' bqg postage neyuired F Dear Edina City Councilmember, The. city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that betryeen 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 60 West is affordable and supportive housing which. will serve approximately 39 youth and youfig adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely J : -73 -,&� GL Ediita City Council �J 4801 West 50th Sweet Name Edina, MN 55424 Address y �' Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Ate- Edina, MN 55424 Address oa- e�� r�. •�ti 1q „0 �Usa+^•� c�,� �j� /4 - �a!J --a+ ®��,/ r .',` ;b r� � . fib, ,N.si.:., t- nr�usi CJ2. �i�hA/r..�;`d.o .� ��1�°�`�.' '4/�'•+�' �-�y _ r $.A9 postage required postage requrrea Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help youtig people End stable housing and end homelessness On anygiven rright, it is estimated that between 900 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hemepki County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve appro3dmately 39 youth and young adults. Please help subiwban youth experiencing homelessness hysuppax-9ng this project., 9 Address ' & e—� ( Dear Edina City Councilmembex, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given ijightb it is egimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs, of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve appi-oidmately 39 youth and young adults. Please help imburlmn youth expeziencing homelessness by supporfing this project.. Edina Q4 Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 I Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Ed' a, MN 5542JL�-r--`� Address M9 PDA"s required postage required Y Dea? Edina City Counciltnember, The city of Edina can h6lp young people fund stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 3()o -youth are Homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which wM serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please hells suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting ibis project.' Sincerely; (J �/ Name Co 7 /1 G O/ , S Address y Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. PIme help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 's-/, gd�YZa l Y r ✓��I'Y�- GGCI�C� Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, HN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, RN 55424 $.49 postage required 8.49 postage required i 693 Dear Edina City Councihnember, Pe 9B requUed The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness, on any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please Delp subiwbair youth experiencing homelessness by Ouppoz ffMg this project. Sincerely, Edina City Cowicil 4801 Nest 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address ` `zl' Dear Edina City Councilmember, postaya requmed The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing.and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless: in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will sei`ve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address f Edina City Council 4$01 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 C' 4 1 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city. of Edina can help your% people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any givprt night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please, help subiw1ban youth. experiencing homelessness by sqpp6Atg this project.. Sincerely, 'Name Addis A I Nor Edina City Council 4801 %st 50th Stieet Edina, MIN 55424 Dear Edina City Coundflinember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated, that between 200 and -300youth are homeless in. the suburbs of Hennepin County 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppoirr"aig this project. Sincerely, I(ame J Address Edina City Council ncil 4801 West 510fiStreet Edina, MN 55424 T%\ 011 9 rp P.49 'Oslhge required postage required $.49 Dear Edina City Councigmember, onstage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. on any given night, it is estfatod that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin . County. 66 West is affordable and suppoitive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth . and yotu g adults, please help suburban youth experienchig homelessness by supporting this project. . A/ ]XIO - Edina City Council Sincerely, r ar& 5/6 CC// Q (� 4801 West 50ih:Stieet Name 6"10 Al �. TGY- Edina MN 55424 Addressa27S��3v��L :49 Dear Edina. City Councilmembel; po5ta9B rgquired The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. Qn any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66,West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth'and young adults. Please help suburban youth expei3encing h¢elessness by supgor`ting this project.. Sincerely,� Edina.City Council 4$01 West 50th $t> eet Name Edina MN 55.424 Address' r, Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city dtf-diba can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that Wween 200 and 3M Youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve. approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project, Sincerely, Name VLL+k kCWy LAACCAe—f- Address (0127<1 -<KOI[ �6 00— (OR Oe nee d VIc44e15 -or Dear Edina City Councilmernber, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County, 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing Homelessness by supportirig this project. Sincerely, Name 541 ( /4 1L4 ) 1�1 V, 0,46'. , 11 ` CtA Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424, Au3t4 s r r sr Edina City Coun.4" 4801 West 50th: $fieet Edina, MN 65& C. postage required required r• Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is .estimated that between 200 and 300.youtli are hoitteless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessnesk by supporting #his project Sincerely, k�i P Name ItddressQ� . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which wall serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address IE% 11VO91 A W _ZiWZ A 70 �zr /C * -, Edna City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 B.A9 postage required �A9 P�80 required r- Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city of Edina can help le di young people find stab X1. ' housing and end homelessiness. , On any given. night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburb's of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults, Pleas'p help salowl )an youth experiencing V honiele.ssnesq by su poldinst this project. Sincerely, Name Address 4-19041,193, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 554,24 %49 pdstaga reqtfired Dear Edina City Councihneibber, o to en,- o J f;2,A f-M a housing and end homelessness. Chit d -agz On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth. are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin &V-4 County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve ,approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suhurlmn youth experiendug Homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name ga'd4u,.Iva, wa�2�1 Address 96112 0.3 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th, Street Edina, MN 55424, r r: Dear Edina. City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end: homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are hoinele�s in the suburbs of.Hemnepisz Comity, 66 West is affordable'and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Most help subiirliau youth expel eneing homelessness by sWpoi ing this projeet. Sincerely, /--�m lr� 7yL�Q Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name fjr;G, ., Edua, MN 5542 s� ✓jr Dear Edina City Couneilmember, �r The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive houimi g which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expeixeneing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, ')AO A% 16 Name Address eJ �a�� Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 i N i�- V . $.49 postage Yequlred s.48 postago �equifed 6.49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On,any giver yi ight it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve. approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburljan youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. t Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name1 Edina, MN ,55424 Address G $ X0 kZ6- C i 6.49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city, of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness, On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, el J} Edina City. Council 4801 West 50th Street Name C� �� Edina, MN 55424 Address _ r Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness, Op any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are. Homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults- Please help suburban.youth experleuciug homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Alt" �1 ilv Name Address �q ✓V 4d' L' e MIS Dear Edina City Councihnember; The city of Edina can help young people find stable. housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help saburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Nam IRX194 (081 '* .t EdinkL City Council 4861 West 50th Street Edina, UN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 5.49 postage required 5.49 postage required r , Y_ Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city Q£ Edina can help youtig people find stable housing and end homelessness: On-any given night; it is estimated that between 200. . and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please Help suburban youth experiencing Homelessuesa by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name �{ Edina, MN 55424 l�'� Address q 6 c Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth ore homeless in the suburbs'of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Since Name Address C, JV4y Z,14 C4w-G7 e n,1� A 4) 5�_YL/ $.a9 poslege required M9 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 * •� ®� 5 r s.49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage requireif The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 -youth are homeless in the suburbs. of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing i4hich will serve apprmimately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expeidencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address l °49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage iequired The city of Edina can'help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve appropdmately 39 youth and young adults. Please help subuiban•youth experiencing homelessness by supporting 04s project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street 1d Name Edina, MN 55424 Address PF The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end, homelessness. 1 On any'-given night, it is estimated that between 200 and, i300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin Couiity. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help subuibnn youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address I Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing. which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Lwbbi .� j-r t` f''Yn Q \+ e 1r Address 100 010` iY► \A �- 6,49 posfage required +:r Edina City Council 4801 West 50th$treet Edina, MN 55424 4 6.49 pottage required Edina .City Council" . 4801 West 50th Street:, '�O e Edina, MN 55424 t. a Dear Edina City Councilinember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On qoy.given night, it is estimated that betwebii 200 and 300 youth are homeless in th 00 ' oss in -e suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable -and supportive housing iirbieh will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness .])y supporting this project. Sincerely, Name rr" el f r f Address 600 r kow-pi q /Avc, C,A,I" LAL--ar, C��vk Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city, of Edina can help young people find stab_ le housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address &t O� C (rv"en 0 t,-q / (%W C tI'ALX!' . , c h Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 - Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55.424 postage required postage required CIO I\Y Dear Edina City, Councilmember, The city of Edina can help youn g people fuid stable . 7 Housing and end homelessness. Qn,afty given night; it it estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, A Name t i.1 CN LI a'vot5 Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable homing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately. 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppo this project. Sincerely, Name 111,4,4, /(.j — . 50-1 Address 1?'6f �i'W IAR6 MWOV-,14 1-k'allyl Edipa, City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 Wrist 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Cv 'N-N- S.49 postage required M9 postage re4t6ed P- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people, find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and WO'youth are'homeless; in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable . and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young. adults. PWse help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 W6st 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address C) e 41 Oz -m Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young peoplafind stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. .66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults.. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 1 1.,eze IA9' Edina City Council,.. ee 4801 West 50th Stet Edina, TVIN 5542 t QD� postage I 5.49 postage required Dear Edina. City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, �p G Name 9 Address CC�L Dear Edina City Councilmember, Ile city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any .given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help ,suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Namei_l��I Addressy�,y'�J, /'��,i,�• �t Edina City Council 4801 West 50t1i Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Cou�ri�i3 4801 V ""g h Stree \" Edi %1T 554S4% ®.49 postage required *.49 postage required 51 Dear Edina. (city Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this pkoject. j Y F Sincerely; ,�, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name �� j.,� Edina, MN 55424 Address (aaA V Dear- Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Henrtepmi i County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expeizencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, J• �' J U �� 0 �1 V c -41 Edina City. Council 4801 West 50th Street Name . J AS�,� Edina, MN 55424 Address z-cy z- Sl Uo I of 'A it �r1ey� p✓ �;�rIQ I��i, 1 6.49 postage. required 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmemberi The "city of Edina can help young people find stable 'housing and eiid Winelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that betwpbri 200 and 300 Youth are bomeldss in the suburbs of H epin enn Cotuity. 66)W�est is affordable and supportive iousing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth exp enonciing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, -- I Address 7 CA Dear. Edina City Councilmember, The city of . Edina can help young people find stable- housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that betiveen 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address �r J El Edina City Couftcfl 4861 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 554241, §31 postage required °.49 postage required V- s.99 Dear Edina City Councihnember, Pnsiage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and goo youth ate liomeloss in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sintered �Z{'�- �`'� Edina City Council y� 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address °.49 Dear Edina City Councilmember, Postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council Name M. -A41t Address 7-I[ C60.4 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 re, Dear Edina. City Councilmeinber, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end howelcissness. On any given night, it ie estimated that between 200, aod 360 youth are boiftelok; in the suburbs of Henn, epin County. 66 West is affordable, mid supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth an adults. young Please help:quhurba-a youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincer Name .5�yl ko 14 PA 0- Address Yo I leum C Dear Edin'a City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and $00 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please lielp suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name iod Address., t.A � M# S-�;V Arm t Edina City. Council, 4801 West 50th•Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street.,."..'.' N E (fin a, MN 55424 q PQ-5two fequlr4d k49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that•beWeen 200 and 30.0 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66.Wbst is affordable and supportive housing, which will serve approxiinately 30 youth and young adults. Please help snbmban youth expehiencing lhomelesmess by supporting d& project. Sincerely, Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expehzencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, X . *46- Name - Address 7rY s� Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 554,24 sqg RkStage required s.A9 paslage required Edina City Council I 4801 West 50th Street-.,-, Edina, MN 55424 k" Dear Edina City CouncilmeMber, The . city of Edina can help young people find stable housing,and end honaelmness. On any given" might, it is estimated that bavken. 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin Coiwty. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximate,4 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, 14ame Lf 0 Address & � gi. 1?LIM e- Dear Edina City C . ouncilinember, The city, of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homdessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homelep in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expeldeneing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address LF-)V/52- leum e. JAY vrtil iJ A,, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 POW90 required 8.49 required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Stkeei-',' Edina, MN 554264-�'. r: Dear Edina City Councilm6mber, The city of Edina can help young people find. stable . housing and end homelessness; On aq given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the - suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppor ing tliis project. Sincerely, Pa. I OJ a, .'W Address waA6 K,.. .riA .fir: S , Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth axe homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affoa:dable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name .A,ddress -e lev M e, t� Edina City Council 4.801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 848 pos�ege rogpTred MO postage required Edina Ci ty Council �� ".. 4301 West 50th Street ; Edina, MN 5542. W Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable . housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between .200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin Counts. 66. West is affordable and suppoitive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please hop, sulnnrban youdi ever eneibg homelessness liy suppokiutg this project. Address Kunne Dear Edina City Councihmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it its. estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County, 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 30 youth and young adults. Pleases help suburban youth experiencing lttomelessness by suppoining this project. Sincerely, 0 NA.�3M1�- r� . Address Edina City. Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 449 postage required CAD postage Fequl�ed f' Edina City Council " 4801 West 50th Strp�t Edina, MN 5542,4":', yW l J•� f s D.eax Edina City Couricilmember, 113 city of Edina can help young people find. Stable . housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 arid- 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County: 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve- approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburb= youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, j/ Name P �1 �t `� l 1 , d i Address Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city of Edina cam help young people find stable housing and end Homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 30D youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this pxoject. $inoerely, l ].Name Address %fl l -���di `, /add f%i in n. . _ / . Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424. . e,49 postase required x.49 hostage required Y. Dear,E dina City Coun6lmembex, The city of Edina can help young people find .stable . housing and end homelessness. M9 postage required On any given mgh.4 it is estililated that between 200 . and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin Couilty. 66 West is affordable. and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and yodfigadults. please help, mAurlban youth experienc* howelessapsp by Onpportfi* this project Sincerely, Edi►a Qity CouA0.1 4801 West 50th Stieet Name Edina, MN 55424 Address 7-V7 Dear Ediiia. City Councilmeffibea; i.49 POW required The city of Edina canhelp young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve appioximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, f Edina City Council 'A 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MW 554,24, Address 14V Dear Edina City- Councilinember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youdi are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 64 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please lielp suburban youth experiencing lwmelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, `- "-��'''�� Edina City. Council 48.01 West 50th Street NameC. Edina, MN 55.4,24 Address Dear Edina City Councilmeinber, The city of Edina can help young people fiiA stable housing and o4cl homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 mid 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs o£ Hennepin County,` 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting dire project. c�L1� a�LV� �.,.]h, r��2GS W \\\ f�%�\ 1 � �i.�Qi1{�h��l W I � Edina City Council Sincerely, r Q,nn��g5 4801 West 50th Street Name J Edina, MN 55424 Address ,r fry an��c,S aqg postage required 6.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help y6un.g people find. stable housing and end homelessness. op any given night,, it is estimated that between 2M and 300 youth are hoin6less in the suburbs of Hennepin county. 66 West is affordable and suppottive housing wbif.h will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help wburbau youth experiencing howelessne.or, by supporting this project. rb,12- 77r_—_ 1 AO W11 57, 4X sinceitlyj Name 5'�i'k4llf /IWO srsl�'WAF Address 7 -7 1 14'v I- Rils7s c-q 2- ci 3 t=f LF MO 1, Dear Edina City Councibnember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and $00 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County, 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help sub-grhan youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address J I A� 11. —i,4,d.An I i Edifia City Gbuncil. 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 554-24 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 . V, S as postage rd4uffed t49 required li L) Dear Edina City Councilmember, The Ofty of Edin4.caini help young people find stable housing and end homelessness, On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homoless in the suburbs. of Hennepin County. 66 West 19 affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppordug this project. Sincerely, Name xg Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina"can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. Oil any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless u1i the suburbs of Hennepin Couiity. 66 Men is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address 9/4 AA A "'A' . Edina City Council 4901 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 rJ postage required ;.49 postage required W Dear Edina City Councilureniber, The city of Ediuia can help young people find stable Housing and end homelessness. Qn any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are lionieless in the suburbs of.Hennepin County, 66 West is affordAle and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. i1 Sincerely, � t b,. �X r e.y Edina City Cgwreil 1 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424. Address [ a �*- _ � 1 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that Between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project, a �zr Sincerely, Name _,I�AAr R c. Address l�v/vi. a qc� postage required Edina City Council. 4,801, West 5001 Street Edina, MN 55424 r �. Dear Edina City Councilmembei, The city of Edina can help. youngpsoplefind stable Housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 Nest is a4ordWe and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting; this project. Sincerely, Name (� Address a- yip s'ya 7 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. Oxi any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth axe homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County: 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supportang this Project. Sincerely, Name &J� IfNt Address 57001 OIVV (s • 1 -4� Edina City Council 48.01 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required =A9 poslagp required r •. a Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ' < • • C Dear Edina City Councilinenilb en, The city of Edina can help young people fwd stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is . estimated that between and 300 youth aro homeless in the subt#IP of Hennepin Comity. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults.. Please help xiburban youth experiencing homelessness, by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address br l�f � Dear Edina City Councilmembea; The city. of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any., given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless . in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve, appmdmatel:y 39 youth and young adults. Please help-ouburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name V-e -7 2, Address 0 Lf �c�AA �--- Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage requtFed k, 016 P4114M6 Edina City Cou jAep 4801 West 5Qdx..s -treet CD Edina, lV )54,24 V postage r, Dear Edina City Councilmeniber, postase required The city of Edina can help young people find stable Housing and end homelessness. On any given night it, estimated that between. 200 is and 300 youth are homeless in the sqbuibg of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable Od supportive, hotsing which will serve approidmatbly 39 youth and young adults. Please help gatirban youth exPePiencing homelessness by suppolting this project. Sincerely). Edina City Council 4801. West 50th Street N :e Edina, MN 55.424 Address m P,,11d 4) 1-4 Dear Edina City Councilmember, rnquircd The city of Edina can help young people find stable Housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that beLlycez) 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help mhurban youth experiencing homelessness by supporling this project. Sincerely, Name rn rnao fi d Address ?- nrm w3 2.0 pl�hA'C14 Ma 65 'f7-3 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street 0 Edina, MN 55424 Ti r. Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On, any given aught, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the subiubs.of Hennepin County. 66. West is affordable and supportive housing w. kch will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Pleaag help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by suppoi -tang tliio projeet- Sincerely, Name ! % Address Edina City Council 4,$01 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 04b . postage required Dear Edina City Councilmembor, . ao wee required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing honxelessnesa by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name eg � Edina, MN 55424 Address 9 ,v6d A4 e, Dear Edina City Councilmeniber, Vie city of Edina can help young people find stable h9us'mg and end homelessness. Ore any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supoTtivahousing -which will serve approximately-39 youth and young adults. Pleas6 help suburban youth experiencing hoirnelessness by suppor6ng this project. VO Sincerdy, it Edina City C . Council 4801 West 50th Street Name J)L-C&ON Edina, MN 55424 Address Dq 6\4 a 6 AV L M (2LS V%A Dear Edina City Councilmernber, The city of Edina can. hel p young people find stable - housing and end Homelessness. on any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expeAencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address Edina City Council 9.01 'West 50th Street' Edina, MW 55424 postage postage required sag postage required M9 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, Tl a city of Edna, can help young people find stable- housing Od end homelessness. On any given nightJi is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approo irately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by eupporting.this project. Sincerely, Edina City Caiincil i 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424, Address -.�°--7 1 A v 0 M C' Dear Edina City Councilmembei; The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On airy given`uight, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth we homeless 4n the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approxiiiately 39, youth and young adults. Please help saaliu>:ban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, j Edina City Council 4801 West 50th`Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address ' 5' jO `�i f15 2* A- 55 �- 1q • 1) MG sag postage required M9 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city, of Edina qui help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. $:49 poslege required Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by - supporting this- project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name,'— Edina, MN 55424 GI %4 vt2 fi,LK, A AJ S S (/'N 1)AA.,C, Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable .housing and eud homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 And 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth .experiencing Uomelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, B� Name Svc?. AL, k I< - r r� Address '3 G l ZO L� = . Vv^ t Y . t.y Edu1a City �ebh. cil 4801 Weftlith St Edin4 'i(55 �1 y °.49 postage requhd OAt 4 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of'Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. Ora any given fight, it is estimated $stbetween 200 and $QO yotith are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 6f West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve appioffimately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this, project.. Sincerely, Name Address 2r I (bla kft -e 5WjPAM 24 Dear Edina City Councihnember, The city of Edina can Help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, nA GO Cr 3 Name l Address S LFi Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 i 8.48 postage required f l' 5.49 postage required Edina City Cour W 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424` ' `yh N �. b�lc ve i taffiler p.cr&ri�, L S�F , I o ���d, i��rc d Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessneps. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in.the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 89 youth and young. adults. Please Delp sub ban youth experiencing homelessness y snppoi�ling thi$ ,project. t4 tit W 4r 1l- i S e� °Ch� l • 't/y �r-� dLkA uVlT-I) r'R.Q_,A'S C' .1n.ca�w2. f ceLS-C RJR Since ely, Name to %v by I r--L Caro o"—.S Address il�WC , `w a ti s Sl- -, IN-& 16 1-kN Wit'°% Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city` of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hen pepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, I Name ) Y U IACk \ Address 15DM AjAitt 1,2k Mim*Va,M 5� Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina; MN 55424 SA9 postage required 5,49 postage required ,c Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Streef, Edina, MN 55424` Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 3,00 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing Homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name, --'7j Address9/ ✓(C�e . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young: people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless iii the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting tide project. Sincerely, bt44' 1 '� Name WSPV Address °� � � APCs Old 6, " o�J Edina City Council 4801 West 50th. Street Edina, MN 55424 M9 postage required M9 postage required t Edina City Council, 4801 West 50th Edina, MN 554 _; tia . Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people And stable housing and end h9melessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County: 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth exgi an" ending homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 aid '300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street N , Edina, MN 55424 Address 1 t'1nVVV 6VI 6,49 postage required 8.49 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, required The city of Edina can'lielp young people find stable housing And end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that hetive&'200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66Westis affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expe►iencing homelessness by suppordm fl& project. Sincerely, Edina City Council. 4891 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 65424 4Lo Address '55 Dear Edina City Councilmember, T n The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing . and end bomdessnes§. On any given night, it is estimated that beween 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs,,of Hennepin County and supportive housing .,.66 West is affordable which will serve approximatel Y '4 39 outh Td young adults. x; suhwr youth �K-S. P �al' V2 hi)melessness by-supporting ffis i r""ee t*. u- aft y� Sincerely, Clio Name 5611f7 0 — /-"' 0 Z Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th sq,'&t % Edina, MN 55+91.. X U.A I forever Dear Edina City CQuncihiietnber, The city of Edina. can Help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated.that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth ea1`pe>denciu19 homelessness by suppoifing this poject. Sincerely, "me Address. Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 33 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth exiuexiencing homelessness by suppoiith* this project. Sincei'� Name Address Z `i 7. C� mu F ��C� t� G�r�i =•,L �Ll�c^-�J y I,,s'6�r�� •'+ •C Vk �31.�.. e LEA r /. ,..U- V AM. *-� i%, W 1%cL e) Edina City Council 480.1 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55924 j :49 postage requl&d $.49 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 N ; '1 ?49 Dear.. Edina City Councilmember, p °stage req�lred The city: of Edina cap help young people find stable housing And end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the sabuibs of Hennepin County: 66. Vest is affordable and supportive housing which will serve. approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing ; homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 48.01 West 50th Street v53 7 L� Edina, MN 55424 Name R. r Address a"O a �y�d 649 Dear Edina City. Councilmember, 1 _ postage V + r, r f regLired The city of Edina can help young people find.stable �dU housing and end hoiinelessness. v (2,-, . Jyk On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 t� i � f and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing n� f which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. 0� �, C b,1 -415-e-, kp ' Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project: �.r• `� Sincerely, Edina City Council . � 4801 W est 50th Steen Name Edina, MN 554; Address 4 3 SLpPA N Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. 011 any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth aie homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 60 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help mkirban youth experiencing lro n ig ]b suppoining this project. Y%n%A�',A 6A .;4A)o R V-44 Sincerely, &94,s. _ k4 vO Ii Z'OP0, . Tj-n4 W\A Name L'Mc- Address a,( ✓/)ATANOU'\-N C14 VOLLrl I MIJ cvj6 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help -young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On apy given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which Na serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Edina City Council 4801 Werq 50th Street Edina, UN 55424 Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness 7b this rT.',e,c,t-. !n:5,por" T e r.JIAOL _4 LA U1 Re bi k e- Edina City Council 4 801 West 50th Street. Name , NI MN 55424 Ni Address � / J -- a ltl x 6 Ile postago required postage required Dear Edina City Coun4member, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness: On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and .300 youth are homeless in the'suburbs.of Hennepin County: �b West is affordable acid supportive housing wluch WM serve .approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessitiess by supporting this project. Sincerely parmae Address_ L Vlow 2 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young peopkAnd stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 360 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which wall serve appiudmately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely; W (J X' A14L �Gt tt/ Name huorit P, bah Io'pr Address ) U S `j,� f ` d rpl) AU-G S ` 160YA N r4�� Edina. City. Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina; =VIN 55424 °.49 postage required •.49 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 a) ` ,•�, (; r , r Dear Edina City Cbuncilmember, The city of'!Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On my given night, it Is- estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help :suburban youth eVeideneing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name • �rAddress f� �Af %� D• Edina City Councilinember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housingatid end homelessness. On any even night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable, and supportive, housing which -,a serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth expeiiencing hoMelessness by MPPorting this Project- tit t Sincerely, Name Address N Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4.801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 postage required required Dew Edina City Councilinember, required . The city of Edina eah help young people find stable housing and eild homelessness. On I any given W&, it is'egfimated that bet.We6n 200 Youth and 300 are hofne.less in-the suburbs of Hennepin . County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve apprqjdmately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suhurban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, 44 AJ IdV- Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address "'f Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina:'can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given Might, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 . youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and.su' pportive. housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, a��-4"Vt- - Name Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55 6.49 postage i-40i"d Dear Edina City Couneilmember, The city. of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On:any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Moe help suburban youth experiencing homelessness "by supporting this project. LO Sincerely, Name CL, 4L'4-0�� Address f , �`to W?i`1 ) L ) o Dear. Edina City Councilmember, The city. of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youtli experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, vdh Name ` Address ` Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City. Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 $ 4Q postage reg6lred X49 postage requhd icy Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edna can help young people- find stable housing and end homelessness. On any givennight, -it is estimated that between 200 and 30Q youth are homeless iii the suburbs of Hennepin County. 6'6 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve appwximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Name te-�k— /' Address 1 -771d Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County, 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name, e- 8 -0-r Address Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 8.49 postage roqulUed i,49 postage required Dear Edina City Councihmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given.night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting tLis. project: Sincerely, Name b", E 4 ili tnn r Address 6u A1-eK Dear Edina City Councilmemben The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name IINLY4 Address 13 xNlNOUt�) 41'r — sl,? 1 94q - +P 5.49 postage required Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 $A9 postage required Edina City Council 4$01 West 50th Street _ Edina, N1N.55424�, L> c, t7r 8.99 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable Housing and ehd homelessness. 8.49 postage required On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66, West is affordable -and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help w1urban youth experiencing , homelessness by supporting this project, Sincerely, �,�I Edina.City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name Edina, MN 55424 Address 3q 17 L� ii✓ �° ?L-�' 1,4.r )'9/o-�- /-Z7/d Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 acid 300 youth ate homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name' , j �p�inemn Edina, MN 55424 Address i ''((i101rn0.6 Ave 5 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The oity of Edina can help young people find stable liousing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are Homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin Gduxity. 66 West is affordable and supportive sousing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suhvrhan youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address.: f Detu Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. ]Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address l Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Ediha,1VIN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 I , Cot ►n • L i x.99 postage required Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people And stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is .estimated thot between -200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Herinep n County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban YOU& experiencing homelessness by suipporting this project: Sincerely, Name 1fI_C , e f. l�coL<c iii Address %/ao Me-I"--' ��o'l f -r-1s- Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and,end homelessness. On any given ini&, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin . County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and;young adults. PIeas.e help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name,, l� s ` � Ud Address '�% Edina City Council 4.801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50* Street Edina, MN 55424 M9 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young poople find stable- housing. and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. i ' Please help suburban youth expetiendmg this homelessness by supporting,. - project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 480.1 West 50th -Street Edina, MN 554 N4me R ►1-� C 11 t I 4,2 Address rf V IF' L) f, '51 'lei 15 If6f, Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required A The city of Edina can help young people find stable P housing and end homelessness. ANI i� On any given. night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin V County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing -which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help su]burban youth experiencing hom. esepess; by supporting i rojec . Sincerely, U4V Edina City Council - 4801 West 50th Street Nam r--- Edina, MN 55424 e t CII-eA+ Oec Address . Dear Edina City Councilmember, postagip requlied The city of Edina can help young people find stable 4ousin-g and end hoi*lessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 Youth are homela$ in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and stipport-iMb housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help gAurban youth expetiencing homelessness by SUPPO IMI pro-JecL A Z /76 / I I ' - ) g, 6W, Sincerely, Edina City Council 48 West .01 50th Street Name Vina, MN 55424 Address '.40 Dear Edina City Councilmember, p9sIgge required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. Or, any givdri night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 Youth and Young adults. Please help Suburban Youth exPerieuel'[119 homelessness by suppoi-ting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name s 2 -&&e Edina, MN 554-24 Address #Woe) ZA)UJIZII-I-ce Dear Edina City Cotuicilmember, The city of Edina can held young people find stable housing and er-d bomolessness. On any given rugbt, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless iri the.suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. 2.r Sincerely, 11Tamr; '� - _ Address 6 ��- YM4 , Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated thatbetiveen 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburbau youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, f �-J ' Name .Address ;�' � a, � / Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage required 6.49 postage required s49 l Dear Edina City Councilmember, Postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is esti 4ted that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in thesuburbs.of Hennepin Countyy, 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban you experiencing � homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Couneil 4801 West 50th Street Name 17 d Sch wk Edina, MN 55424 Address .3%5 %49 Dear Edina City .Councilmember, postage tequifed The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any .given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will seine approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this pro' t. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Nair / Edina, MN 55424 u, Address Dear Edina City Couricilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any:given night; it is. estimated that between 200 and 3.00 youth are homeless in the suburbs of lennepin County. 06 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerelyi Name <`�1 Address SS Dear Edina City Councilmemb , 47"e is � i /tw*7, * iZ's The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, �G Name t �r'G�`1 '�14. �. Address�� _ Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 6.49 postage iequlred 6.49 postage 2quired Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 A�. M9 Dear Edina City Councilmember, postage required The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessiiess. On arty given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 306 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepm County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will .serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing Homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina City Council 4 ;801 West 50th Street Name /'/C cj ' As 'Tlri_ C- Edina, MN 55424 j�� C9Q te) (u— 14 'I7 A d C Address e %,✓ %� S �' �y3 ei 9 / Bear Edina City Councilmember, postage • regulred The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth ,are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 99 youth and young adults. Please help subburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, , " Z'7n. Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name To -7 11 13Y b 01 Edina, MN 55424 �pEE` c�� Address `7.3oZ Lv� s`�' S %u�r� r /Sc h,I q P2 IV S L 1' 66 West Apartments Site Plan Review Submittal June 19, 2014 UNIT COUNT VICINITY MAP _ WIT TYPE SUBLEVEL. LEVEL LEVEL 1 uNIr TYPE TOTAL NOT TO SCALF Gi SIQOD a 1s 19 � �i 6rW LOo SITE 9 to 20 i CONTACTS D�VELOPER/CUENT CONTRACTOR - TBD AHCHITEC FAR. DIAL ENGINEER NAME BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING NAME: COMPANY / FIRM NAME HERE NAME. URBANWORKS ARCHITECTUE LLC NAME PIERCE PINT a ASSOCIATES, INC BBB - B COLIAB0f94TIVE CONTACT: CONTACT NAME HERE CONTACT. TOO ELKINS CONTACT LEAN GPRDNER CONTACT LEE BLONS CONTACT NAME HERE DAVID HAALAND Sheet—an appears RAH SA [ARSON ADDRESS: ADDRESS LINE 1 ADDRESS' 901 N 3RD. ST ADDRESS 9298 CENTRAL AVE NE SUITE 202 ADDRESS 26101INIVERSfIY AVENUE WEST AODfESS UNE2 SURE 145 BLNNE, MN S &431 (top d perapw . cite, W) SAINT PAUL, MN 55111 PHONE No PHONE NO. HERE P HONE No 612155.3100 PHONE No 163 537.1311 PF04E No 651 7884260 FAX No'. FAX NO HERE FAX No 612/553199 FAX No 163 637 -1351 FAX No 651 - 789 4288 E MAIL E MAIL HERE E -MNL DIVd1AND@URBAN WORKS COM E MAR KEVIN(WERCEPINI COM E MAIL St AASONpBEACONINTERFAITH ORG WALL FINISH TAG I <SHT41 2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MEP ENGINEERS INTERIOR DESIGNER NAME STUDIO GREEN LANOSC! PE NAME: BKBM ENGINEERS, S, INC NAME. STEEN ENGINEERING INC NAME 02 GROUP NORTH ARCHITECTURE INC CONTACT: JOHN TIMM CONTACT MARK BRENG.IAN CONTACT- GERRY EWALD CONTACT BILL DELAFEY 8113E -'WWI Bees KURT SMITH . I ADDRESS 1618 KELLY DRIVE ADDRESS: SIM BROOKLYN BOULEVARD ADDRESS 5830 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH ADDRESS. 901 N SRD. ST GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55827 �jLFi1 �- MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5&426 CRYSTAL. MN 56129 BUTS 115 PHONE No 81215&3181 PHONE No 7614/30120 PHONE No 763 - 5854782 PHONE No 812 -156 -3100 FAX No 8124563198 FAX No, 7614/30121 FAX No FAX No 61215&3199 E MAIL STUDIOGREENLA@COMCAST NET E -MAIL JTMM@BKBM CON E MAIL KURTSM@STEENENG COM E AW L GERRYE@G2GROIP MN COM HWE _ SITE & BUILDING STATISTICS A SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE 39,356, 10 9035 ACRE) B GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. LEVEL TWO 11 -114 If C PERCENT OF SITE COVERAGE a %SITE COVERAGE . 28.71c FLOORARIEARATIO FAR. 057 D DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE 39UNITS /90 ACRE= 43 UNITS PER ACRE E PERCENT PERVIOUS SITE AREA 11,011111 119%PERVIOUI F ELEVATION ABOVE MEW SEA LEVEL. LEVEL / = BBB - B G. HEIGHT OF ROOF ABOVE GRADE 22 - 0' H TOTAL NET LEASABLE AREA a J 13,072 W PARKING STALLS CURRENT DESIGN FUTURE PROOF OF STALL TYPE PAPoONG PMiONG HIC P.- I* so 1 1 92WII 3411 1e m Cara 1 19 37 BICYCLE PARKING I BICYCLE P/WONO j TMAJ 1 20 SYMBOLS EDINA MN MAIL Ti GENERAL NOTES I DO NOT SCALE DRAIWNGS 2 SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND SHALL REVIEW THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO FAIIL.IAR12E THEMSELVES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE SCOPE OF THE WORK PRIOR COMMENCEMENT OF WORK DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOP CIARIFICATION 3 BUILDING TO BE SPRINKL ED REF NO SECTION MARKER � PRIMARY ELEVATION MARKER ROOM NAME ROOM M NAME ROOM TAG SHT a J III SedKn itlaaBlraaon Sheet—an appears C. canetn,alm SECONDARY ELEVATION MARKER (top d perapw . cite, W) �T'l. CEILING TAG REY 1 REVISION MARKER �`` ELEVATION MARKER WALL FINISH TAG I <SHT41 2 - -WWI Elevetlanitlen9licaLlm MAn -� - _ Ma1M6l Shoat vRlae a[avacon appears NORTH FIN - W" Rk, e 3 8113E -'WWI Bees . I NORTH MARKER -Well Mauloal0 REF. / 110 FLOOR FINISH TAG �jLFi1 �- DETA11 MARKER — - SURFER ? -_ �tlbr MW41N -_ _ � Fl7iFTN - �Rm Tl' Daei OenUhoehm. Sheet v we oeleli 1p 11 .. DOOR # DOOR MARKER I. _ _ co ca,arudKn WOW WINDOWMARKER lOr FL OOR TRANSITION TAG s blbor MIR w 1 Slblbor Metenal 2 DETAIL MARKER KEY KEYNOTE Iedalas Waal rea DOW co Ltoaaon SKael W e tlaWi appears �;. - KEY / 10Y MATERIAL I9:Y71I3TE 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBANWORNS 901 NORTH THIRD STMT, SLATE 185 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 86101 OONBULTANT REVKHONB A 0c4 D.41glm DATE OL19MI4 DRAVVN BY AS OHECKED BY ON KEYNNI TITLE SHEET G001 mPVy1 m M13 w ramm 1,C KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. ALTA SURVEY OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 721 OLD B30HWAY 6 N.W. Nell BRIGHTON, MmEsOTA 55112 � � .iw swALS xo Rcr 661- 691 -0361 BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING PAIL 681- e01p --le eae.u: tamparepro- ..a.l w...kempenurveYe.rnm Nroa.owirz snilx COLLABRATIVE SITE soTA OFPARrxFNr SECTION 29, T28N. F _ = +• RATEAri","'iiiE�werA1K„r� _ I ■ IL( Vii' ( EXISTING TCF BANK) OavATKw: sorA�.�ra AxerarrAadi STAnd 1 ar RA457'920W' E 6 2N M lmr„ 3330 WEST 66TH STREET xlgiwAY 0AV exAw rm (NAVO ®1 C(N1pU1 erIFRVAL_, rmT 4 z, :'.. es CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AREA SUMMARY SUBJECT PROPERTY 39.356 SO. FT. OR 0.9035 ACRES / I..I .: / 1„1fEDTA OPMrIWNT Nd O 1 / P, _ANnaRTAtKN serve en Tow D• AM . (x.wws I webs ry0� N�' g,6 LLC idiwee ��2R¶ES B P 1a 1g, �pW f 4 P`VI�N I D E 9 VICINITY MAP wee a ,��/ (NO SCALE) .. ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING r RX xAA I ryiC% 8525 BARRIE ROAD OEV ee.- Jllr- " ..� - S 89'45'1 1 . 8 (M 6 FOLW _ m2. -f 11r .a a D.b o"e •• e 12 3330 WEST 66TH STREET (FRONT) i ." .•..... %: - eeA+ ' re, NA MINNESOTA INNESOTA .` - ° •a rear' - el JI• AM F1 amA'R CANpP _Ao R (,mwU � ex .. W. • a a - - ~ - T'� e., 7s LEGAL DESCRIPTION . n nea se .s ee a STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY ><epTy 10X caxge:rt 7 �uwG °oiaKii,L. IS TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 501931 -, e�.s. ° A f 0 Tm se [ :8 psv her U•TQIFP ��� ` �{ y' TL • Y s, r i, e� I.�r{\ s _NT n.I. 1. IsglLgiu•e. 14) EFFECTIVE DATE' FEBRUARY 20, 2014 , x rt.. x�. V The Swm 300 feet of Lot 2. as m .,ed dmg Ne Ly Kd 4K TI O 1 I - Weel IMe of .old lot from the soutn...I comer thereof n Block 3. Swlhdole Acrn. Hennepn Cwnt,, Minnesota DRIYE-THRU TELLER LANES• else • • 3330 WEST 66TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA .. { ' ' 2+ - -MZS u Teel W - -� 14. _ eF ;� J 4 • cckm J . NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B ' IIM.I c I� 4 ' �rnY eeia STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 501931 sexes e6xr!•• P Tm'b v,� " _ a7 g xx EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2014 ZONING REQUIREMENTS • I, e� ,o S .� 12 Tmcl marked by judicial lendmorks as sI m plat, ZONED POD -1: PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT -1 W.n - m A e n I F �• w (shown ae recHof MM aIXI thew bjxl property Wt no judicd Imdmorks isl the bject property. SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR 40 PEOPLE IS NOT A PERMITTED $^ e -- {A .. 3 13 Subject to Me 11x1 of the ordnance of the City of NOR A CONDITIONAL USE. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REZONED TO ACCOMMODATE THE PLANNED FUTURE USE. e irllM ea L I1 Lyw A c � " Echo rNotIw to subdivision thereof. a copy of which ordnance le of record N Book 641 of Mlacellansws LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS ARE NOT MENTIONED IN THE CODE FOR POD -I DISTRICT. Se eeee 7 �f a y o ee.5o • ' 6ZONING 19 G• yy •E y�y Rx der of page 45 (Mown as rxltd) AHects sbject pr ww t y m d is blnket n nature MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: 301 OF THE TRACT MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIP. 0.51 OF THE TRACT _ a �y-- � I.. 3 .:8 j '� ' I' a ,Y ASR iL - II bL„ [1 „K?i�'TT .Tj� a 8 so 14. Agm-mt between Coopseative Poww Assxiatim and TwN Cltin Federd SaV,9s and Lom Asso,l tim dated July 17, 1961, filed July 20, 1981 m Dowment No 14 J146 BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: [Ij�17 TI i LJ.• {j m's' I • I `� .. �- = ANxls aubjxt property and b plotted and Mown hereon. FRONT STREET: 35 FEET- SIDE STREET: 35 FEET' _ OP`v t ' yy�j S�eT t. Y0. l Lo x 15 Thls document Is not survey Ns.ted. INTERIOR SIDE 20 FEET- A�� v 2 A . �,, �¢ 0 16 VMoseh by City of Dow doled 42 B, 21107, filed March 8, 2007 Dowment No. 4364254. REAR YARD 20 FEET- e.e •, O ; w € .e as Affects subject property and b not Plottetle. • 1 ".• �O g` .� ,I , OR THE BUILDING HEIGHT. IF GREATER. (BUILDING (BUILDING IS APPROXIMATELY 26 FEET TALL) • N �3 tl �(ee.:ee xmial n8 •. •e PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Lor 2 ELI Tel - ®wr EeaM v snn s TWENTY- ElG4fT (28) PARKING SPACES PER VARIANCE DOCUMENT NO. 4364254 (SCHEDULE B, ITEM 16). LJJ I .� se, �/�/�// e I OQ NOTE: THE CITY MAY OPT TO REZONE THIS LOT UNDER ME PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, IF SO, THE UNDERLYING SETBACKS WOULD CONTROL. OR THE CITY Q ° '(MJ ' � COULD REZONE THE PROPERTY TO BE PRO -4 PANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -4 TO ACCOMMODATE THE FUTURE • Apt w Z e' Asx a np >< PLANNED USE AS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR YOUTH. ME PRO -4 REGULATIONS ARE LISTED BELOW. ?«r -see" e1Aq i •NA„E CIS PRD-Y. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ® here N CURB ' .OTE_ xNamALHNFNt .LONG RAarYRT uxr IS POe UrU01 m J ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ARE A PERMITTED USE. 1 rwS pRppll ten sr AM aF iA,AKT fJEY. EF, f1AY. N j AS Aad-1 wfXX10m A5 , 1- 14) N ..y,M. tsacwlA .. �rtM �., � € w REQUIRED LOT AREA: 2,900 S0. FT_ PER DWELUNG UNIT I MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: 301 OF LOT AREA $ I I • BUILDING SETBACKS: • 6C E • 'it. w FRONT STREET: 35 FEET esim Mtm [i A "TCF BANK" i see •f xleos, �sTw 3n SIDE STREET: 35 FEET INTERIOR SIDE: 35 FEET 1 3330 WEST 66TH STREET _ Y : 3- . REAR YARD: 35 FEET 25• ONE -STORY BRICK BANK BUILDING tl o I BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA. 6,057 50. FT (AS PER CITY OF EDINA ZONING CODE) _ 5 PID! 29- 028 -24-24- 0030 os NOTES It 491e ,$ wev. 1 Tiers SURAN WAt m4KKnD 1M A UMA RCS I= WTAL STI11 N AND YMTIt �x'RF IXOR s %PS na ILKA 6 -14 DRS SKrIM. aplinolaa'NeO1w nw`"iaur ro s�TO°r wwn uru"c: A"r L.ASLwm _ ax.m w'� BEw.� wcMc �� raA d P,IIAxrF eN. er.0 °� • .a4 •. 9 °Zpp V R�. LTCV. eee.s, ruv. nzu la ar r.11 ,vl F s a awe m7Aias Der WAS LN Z On=R1ss=Nmm. xus,am 8 p r..s, $ ® zsn o e, � .x .. nmN rs No aesuv.elc Lvaaa or a,KTLxi6 w ewwL _S Ij ex.ss _ ®w'"'v mw1TlPOie itwpuul w"o"me.cei gia''ru -AA. m N.TAS egmw„G m w A.Is a01°� � � -D ;jn""mML N A � ANA mF la nif YrWIDK xA for s Ururr �OUrt aK- .rs wrrrtD B, +rs w rT ,y r. b�MM± sETBA« Dwes1 �� IN - RVL_NLy - nAO -') IM.I n I seer n l _ . orqurto wslc laixa wA,c. rRrerR.r wA eARRK RoAO. wxx z AUf UC[wv a•, RvcT ' mfg 5 [\AW4E Y MM WMia AqA, eUIUxG Nv e,+: N fIID = M, ,7. .... ATaxr eax,xS 9 xANDAxaLS N STRmr NWT K wAY 1116 OMER CMYfrED npT1 rR a - weeam wMODBO v TAB[ r� a'OxIRaNINa AMSdODdi. s fro DeBnvAelc x a waxr sTem m sawNK I Rrplf 9NN sky eourN I,E I . . r cagiswwt ,R.ucliar a AEr.ws ee+.b st'.s "� ' _ sdL RLS,� cs srz usE As . saro w.srz ous, wio w " x { pJ:Y.. eep.lx.., sA°�,wv wurXi fe. eeD.>: en 's. s ml.le As sea - _ y�� N 89' 12 W 1 1.21 M 6 STREET (REAR> 3330 WEST y EDINA. MI MINNESOTA d �K,a 1A„ sa.N K„ New srt R.w d Nfr 1rK pDf„w srArz arc -cAU7 LR ,ggKF - .. ' A•egF ens+ IF mm eeo. RM d: - u' sea n ea sr e°,°14 s sea lo' RGB.! enu BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY 1n •Ig - FOOTPRINT OF BUILDING- 6,057 SO. FT. AREA OF FRONT PATIO. 295 SO. FT. Wft p° - AREA OF REAR PAT10- 233 SO. FT. .. X TOTAL BUILDING AREA- 6,585 SO. FT. xeeO.JS (16 7% OF LOT AREA) sT YnaXilcR A ,. w 6eo -er sj ®w- +�I or R WEST 66TH STREET _ i'- DRIVE THRU CANOPY AREA- 1,396 SO. "T. a =m« _�:: m ; n s.:w�� (NOT INCLUDED IN BUILDING COVERAGE) � m - e� E „w l - Ix - " N 89'4512 - W 1493.10 a e1ysT 5 69'4512' E 1136.0i T esLO4 IZO' T -OF -WAY - - - my e�T?4egs M (65• NORM - 55 TN) x eZ'„" y, n V v'so xewA 1'v er4.ep [- s xeete+ xv BITUMINOUS ROAD r INY e°�s "pe xem.xe r -w b uA,z PARKING SUMMARY ss - c ' b ss a ss a 4r ev ss ^mss . w 26 STANDARD SPACES -- - -- -�� 2 HANDICAP SPACES 28 TOTAL PARKING SPACES . .. PREPARED FOR f ._. SARAH • .. ce - BEACONLNTERFAITHCIHOUSING COLLABORATIVE - 2610 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 100 _ SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 OFFICE: 651 -789 -6260 EXT. 206 LEGEND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE -SS- sw1AAr sEw[R LN[ s'"0 sA T""` x""N To: Beocm mtwrolth Hwsing Cdloto -tim STATEMENT OF APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS arc s»N0 smlx MANxa[ -sT- WA_ St.wmt Title Guormty Compmy and Lmd Title. Inc ;is agent: PUBLIC SIDEWALK ENCROACHES ONTO SUBJECT PROPERTY A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 3.56 FEET WITHOUT THE BENEFIT twQ rF1ER1(„F uAreiaT -w- M6P xAN Ge mrvKF AINN OF AN APPARENT EASEMENT. ce cArw eA5„ -o- oAS YAM pR _eOt =, is to certlity thot this mop or plat and the wniey m which it I. hosed BUILDING ENCROACHES INTO SIDE STREET SETBACK A ® a ® IA- s- �m 1RAR1p peccTaN made M eddmc. with Me 2011 Minimum Stmdard Detal Req It enls of ALTA /ACSM Lmd Title Surveys, jointly estobliMad d adopted by ALTA nd MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 9.6 FEET. w 0 wTn vALVT NSPS, and Includes hems 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 7(a). 7(b)(I)• 7(a), 8, 9, 11(.), ev 0 GAS -W pLNOT9 61UMw5 -A,ow. N. 14, 16, 17 and 18 of Toble A thereof. The field wo.4 was completed m 31. FLOOD ZONE O _cTNC n xsaR cA owm6 aglo F c sA.AaNC Mmoth 2014. SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES 'MTHIN FLOOD ZONE 'X• DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.21 0 W„wxii AO„, Dote: APRIL tl, zou •+ KE •',.; +(` (AREAS ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOOPLAIN) ACCORDING TO THE R 0 Rom uaT Cd016 OMOlvax IN) ..... _nipF ••. 9 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD w ® DpuR.a a mis sLwvxr c,tuc Farzi[ '. D PROFES"k INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 27053C0 364E, DATED SEPTEMBER 2. 2004, HENNEPIN m m Riga TCF BANK PLYON SIGN JZ sK„ Oil Mark D. Kemper, Profess Land Surveyor LjM10501NEYDR COUNTY, MINNESOTA orcDnx 3330 WEST 66TH STREET ❑x aw cONgTIONNC uMr mxorts B, sw li in' -.1. Rsgistretlm No. 1841 1M07 EDINA, MINNESOTA °eD r`° Kemper k Ate- leles. Inc. 721 Old Hwy 61 New Brighten, Minnesota 55112 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY �L�L yP PAme: 651- 631 -0351 MI ^' FaN: 851 -631 -8805 w16e ,4ab (T4pJ6pea) kelnpel0mmpersurveys.com GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY KEMPER AND ASSOCIATES, DATED APRIL 11, 2014. 2. A SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION RAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT TO DATE, BUT WILL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DIRT AND /OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF -SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLED MANNER. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND /OR DEBRIS AND IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL. 5. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING ARE TO BE RESTORED AND REVEGETATED. 6. ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION AND /OR ABANDONMENT TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS. 7, EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS. CABLE N, COMPUTER CABLE, FIBER OPTIC CABLE, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT THE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL BEFORE EXCAVATING. S. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN EXPENSE. 10. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE TOP OF PIPE AS FOLLOWS: A. 8' OVER WATER MAIN B. 5' OVER SANITARY SEWER C. V OVER STORM SEWER 12. ALL WORK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS. 13. ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR. PART 1926, SUBPART P -EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 14. SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES TO WITHIN FIVE FEET OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH OF CONNECTION WITHIN BUILDING. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS TO VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND QUANTITY OF ALL ROOF DRAINS AND UTILITY CONNECTIONS. 16. PROVIDE BARRICADES AT STREETS AND SIDEWALKS PER CITY OF EDINA AND MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. 17. MAINTAIN 3 FEET VERTICAL AND 10 FEET HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER PIPES. 18. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHIN ADJACENT STREETS TO BE RESTORED TO MATCH EXISTING. 19. DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE AREAS OF TEMPORARY SUPPORT SYSTEMS. THE CONTRACTOR 5 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MEANS AND METHODS AND WILL HAVE TOTAL CONTROL OVER THE TYPES AND DESIGN OF ALL SHORING, SHEETING, BRACING, ANCHORAGES, EXCAVATION SUPPORT WALLS. DIRECTIONAL BORING, AUGER JACKING, SOIL STABILIZATION AND OTHER METHODS OF PROTECTING EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. 20. STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF EXISTING SITE FEATURES WHICH NEED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DAMAGE OR THEFT OF THESE ITEMS AND TO REPLACE AT OWN EXPENSE. 21. CONTRACTOR TO RECORD EXISTING CONDITIONS AS NEEDED (PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEO PHOTOGRAPHY, FIELD SURVEYING. ETC.) TO ENABLE RECONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EXIS71NG CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR TO DOCUMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS SO THAT RECONSTRUCTED AREAS WILL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SIMILAR TO EXISTING. SEE SPECIFICATIONS, 22. ANY REDESIGN OF DEMOLISHED STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WILL NEED TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. 23. WHERE DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION, UNDERPINNING, PILE DRIVING OR SIMILAR WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED ADJACENT TO OR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE BUILDING SURVEYS AND SEISMIC MONITORING. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 25. ALL MATERIALS FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR OF EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE NEW PRODUCTS DIRECT FROM THE FACTORY AND FREE FROM DEFECTS. 26. WHEN WORKING AROUND EXISTING TELEPHONE OR ELECTRICAL POLES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRACE THE POLE FOR SUPPORT. 27. WHEN WORKING AROUND EXISTING UTILITIES. LIGHT POLES, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, TELEPHONE OR POWER POLES. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPPORT OR BRACING TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE STRESS ON THE PIPING. THE CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES CAUSED BY FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE THESE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. 28. CARD FILES OF THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION FOR STAKING PURPOSES. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCES TO TYPICAL LAYOUT OF THE SITE. NOT ALL SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED. 29. CARE MUST BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION TO PROTECT ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS AND /OR PROPERTY IRONS. 30. ALL STUMPS FROM TREES REMOVED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE GROUND AND REMOVED IN THEIR ENTIRETY. 31. WASTE MATERIALS INCLUDING PAVEMENT REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, WASTE PIPING AND SUPPLIES, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL SMALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT SITE AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 32. MAXIMUM CROSS- SLOPES FOR SIDEWALKS AND ADA ACCESS ROUTES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.007[. ADA SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.00X SLOPE ALONG THE PATH OF TRAVEL. 33. CONTRACTOR SMALL NOT BLOCK DRAINAGE FROM OR DIRECT EXCESS DRAINAGE ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY. 34. ADEQUATE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND ANY DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SMALL BE RESTORED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNING AUTHORITY. ALL CONSTRUCTION STORM RUNOFF SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REQUIREMENTS. 35. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS. ACCESSIBLE AND SAFE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY THAT MEETS ADA AND MINNESOTA MUTCD STANDARDS IF WORKING IN A SIDEWALK AREA AND TRAFFIC CONTROL PER MINNESOTA MUTCD REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF -WAY. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBANCE OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. (HAY BALES ARE NOT AN ACCEPTABLE PERIMETER CONTROL). 2. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT EACH POINT WHERE VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. USE 2 INCH OR GREATER DIAMETER ROCK IN A LAYER AT LEAST 12 INCHES THICK ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE. EXTEND THE ROCK ENTRANCE AT LEAST 50 FEET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE USING A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH THE AGGREGATE TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF SOIL INTO THE ROCK FROM BELOW. 3. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. REMOVAL SWILL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING OCCURS AND MAY BE ORDERED BY CITY INSPECTORS AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS. CATCH BASIN INSERTS OR OTHER APPROVED PRODUCTS ARE REQUIRED IN UNDISTURBED AREAS THAT MAY RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA. MAY BALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION. 5. LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN TWO FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE /GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS. 6. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. 7. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS WHICH HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL GRADING, AND ALL AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN, WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 7 -14 DAYS. USE SEED AND MULCH. EROSION CONTROL FATTING, AND /OR SODDING AND STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS. AN EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON AREAS TO BE PAVED IS RECOMMENDED TO MINIMIZE EROSION POTENTIAL. 8. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY, SYNTHETIC, STRUCTURAL. NON - BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT. FINAL STABILIZATION FOR PURPOSES OF THIS REMOVAL IS 70% ESTABLISHED COVER OVER EXPOSED AREA. 9. READY MIXED CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANTS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. ALL CONCRETE RELATED PRODUCTION, CLEANING AND MIXING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE IN THE DESIGNATED CONCRETE MIXING/WASHOUT LOCATIONS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE MAY WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STORM DRAIN CONVEYANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL SET UP A CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA ONSITE THAT COMPLIES WITH MPG REQUIREMENTS. 10. CHANGES TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION AND DETAILS FOR ALL PROPOSED ALTERNATE TYPE DEVICES. 11. ALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS ARE TEMPORARY. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION WRING CONSTRUCTION AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL PAVING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT . 12. EROSION CONTROL SMALL BE PLACED ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE EXCAVATION. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED SO IT DOES NOT DISTURB THE EXISTING PAVEMENT OR DRIVE LANES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. MANY METHODS OF EROSION CONTROL WILL WORK AND IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSTALL THE MEASURE MOST APPROPRIATE TO THE SITE CONDITIONS AND THAT WHICH MEETS THE CITY OF HUDSON STANDARDS. GRAPHICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR CLARITY BUT SMALL BE PLACED IN THE MOST APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD AND BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUMINOUS ROAD IS TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGED CURB AND GUTTER OR ROADWAY WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND PAID FOR SOLELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. SEE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. CONTRAC70R TO PREVENT DIRT AND /OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF -SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLED MANNER. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND /OR DEBRIS AND IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL. 14. CONTRACTOR 70 PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH ON ALL NON -PAVED AREAS WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETED. SEED WITH ANNUAL RYE SEED AT 60 LOS PER ACRE AND WOOD MULCH FIBER AT 45 LBS PER 1,000 SF. 15. STRAWBALES ARE NOT ALLOWED ON SITE IN ANY CAPACITY. LEGEND SSMH O EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE STMH O EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EMH ❑ EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE CB ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN CB EXISTING CATCH BASIN EH EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT W V ® EXISTING WATER VALVE ET EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LP 0 EXISTING LIGHT POLE BL 0 EXISTING BOLLARD LIGHT GM © EXISTING GAS METER TR ❑T EXISTING TELEPHONE RISER 7 EXISTING SIGN - UE - EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -OH- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE -SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE -ST- EXISTING STORM SEWER LINE -W- EXISTING WATER MAIN OR SERVICE -FO- EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBEROPTIC _G- EXISTING GAS MAIN OR SERVICE - - PROPERTY LINE 254 PROPOSED CONTOUR t$ PROPOSED SP07 ELEVATION 4*-- DENOTES SURFACE DRAINAGE - - - - - PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE ® PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN O PROPOSED MANHOLE DS PROPOSED DOWNSPOUT N PROPOSED VALVE < PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ® PROPOSED RETAINING WALL �- - - - -- SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL AT CB /NTH PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVING D PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 66 West Apartments 3330 661h St. West. Edina URBANWORKS W7 NORM THIRD STREET. SUITE 146 MNNEAPOUS. AIN 55401 612.455.310D CONSULTANT PIERCE PINI & A550CIATES sRYIMIA�EE1111F I1t 1Ui1t� Rug >N1c1m.m� 1om.w PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 06.16.2014 PROECT • 1+021 PHASE XXX DRAWN BY DIK CHOCKED BY KTG NOTES AND LEGEND C100 w„"0 XW a ue.wea.a vm.. &-m-0 c ',I S i 11t M ' Q Q N• r a J • zz .s" MR. I` C � 1i� O ✓ ,. KEY NOTES 1. REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 2. REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 3. REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4. REMOVE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL 5. REMOVE SIGN AND BASE 6. REMOVE LIGHT POLE AND BASE 7. REMOVE TREE AND STUMP S. REMOVE CANOPY, SUPPORT POSTS. AND FOOTINGS 9. REMOVE TRASH ENCLOSURE AND FOOTINGS 10. REMOVE BIKE RACK 11. REMOVE PNEUMATIC TUBE INFRASTRUCTURE 12. REMOVE HAND RAILING 13. REMOVE TELLER MACHINES AND BOLLARDS 14. REMOVE FLAG POLE AND BASE 15. REMOVE BANK SIGN AND FOOTINGS 16. SAWCUT PAVEMENT TO FULL DEPTH 17. REMOVE BENCH AND CONCRETE PAD ®Z eeasc s i� o� — — — — 1 — + 76.23 sw C. w w �K„A s�ocw. w w w w w w e"mc. m(wo diKAw.h " " . ,.. " _ > ,.. APO �� �aa s � � N •,5. .�. a>9�s I ". "maw, 0 0 I WEST 66TH STREET I RI :7 wwn n cw s PccwP „sss s -w p 5S -SS NORTH ® SITE DEMOLITION PLAN 20 ' - 0 20' 40' 1. 1 20' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 66 West Apartments 333088th St. West. Edina 1� I� O URBANWORKS sot NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 146 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 564M 812.455 S1m CONSULTANT PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATE5 stFNINL �N:UIfEM �wc as i ,pmm.+m lO ®.NM PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS • DM Deml dbl DATE 06.16.2014 PROJECT / 14@1 PHASE 100( DRAWN BY DTK CH7BDKED BY KTG SITE DEMOLITION PLAN L:7 C200 —v t o aD w�AVYm..- eaz. W2 -•, I I ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING I 66 West 6525 BARRIE ROAD J�•]T Apartments a 4 FBez..6 B,z,I r— 3330 IBM St. West, Edina tR 02.02 ° 0.3,, _ �._._. _.�.�.._...._ a..B BB2. j P w o .BBe INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION— ENTRANCE AT ALL LOCATIONS I ae x .mil E WHERE WORK VEHICLES EXIT SITE, TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL 5 /C600 INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL eez -.�• I / „� AROUND PROJECT LIMITS, TYPICAL, xe0•.as " I SEE DETAILS 1 /C600 AND 4/C600 1 76 2. � 'xBB06i URBANWORKS F I wE f.'" — S II S • Bz SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR TREE e62. e..BS es, g easo,eaa se B6 °°s 6i Bs. PROTECTION FENCING AND DETAILS, e01 NORTH nnRO SmffT. StalE 1^6 d - TWICAL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 65401 r i 612.45531GD 71 FFE = 886.5 �— LFE = 675.5 = xBezn 8 CONSULTANT D i �; i PIERCE PINI & O i i -.73 �B ASSOCIATES i EI REN I RAIN GARDEN, !� j SEE DETAIL z4Mn',a I PRELIMINARY e Q I� m NOT FOR .22 j s ° '' CONSTRUCTION I� e MATCH I XISTING CUB AND SI EWALK C E AND U ITS OF REMOVALS, g T TYPI 6 ti, FFE =86.50 w o REVtSXX4 41III e i AI� s Dery D..". 6 I < ° inv 826,!9 n -5 o ba�B '• I MB °EB B,— - 7 FFE 686.5 ° iB RETA11 ING -_ LFE = 875.5 B s TOP= NNN���BBBY. -86.50 SOT. SOT =978. S FFE -86.50 mi6 o I xsao ,eoz� w i IY`TGyz'2h- BB -1.tlAg EB t7'� 00 DATE 06.16.2014 CONSTRUCT NEW R• 14)m V� -- -_ EXTERIOR STAIRS jLD - 3 RISERS O 6' EACH DRAWN BY DPI CHECKED BY KTG i �, xoea.os ._.._.. .._.._,I ..J ee n — L/� M1/ w BB • ,.{ w B— 5DEI w BBC. 1 CB v BeI6.66 nE BeeO. B Biu B,B,B INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON L SLOPES 4MAV OR STEEPER, TYPICAL, �SSfifififi 55 sINSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL CATCH SEE C600 mv\ '4,1 BASINS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO WORK s xeeO B, I eeoSITE, TYPICAL. SEE DETAIL 2 /C600 0 0– WEST 66TH STREET GRADING, > BBB B�M BBB B. eB BB BB, my 8,021 I a .m B BB E -- - - - � - - - -- -- - - — — - -- -,ice -d 6 EROSION r51� w .71 ;og„ x88062 a ;e0lB 8802, CONTROL PLAN s Bs s BB .s, ° ( Bin ss ss B° BBS ]B E -w p NORTH GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PRELIMINARY C300 ® c3oo 1._20, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 20' 40' 60' �rNeozw BrMr,re,e 4ww.uc PREVENTION PLAN ( SWPPP) IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)ISTATE (NPDES)/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (SOS) CONSTRUCTION THE PROJECT. THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPG). THE GOAL OF POLLUTION PREVENTION EFFORTS DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION IS TO CONTROL SOIL AND POLLUTANTS ON THE SITE AND PREVENT THEM FROM LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE AND FLOWING TO SURFACE WATERS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SWPPP IS TO PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR ACHIEVING THAT GOAL. THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE AND UPDATED AS NECESSARY DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION TO KEEP IT CURRENT WITH ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THE POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES BEING UTILIZED. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MULTI -UNIT LANG COMPLEX, PARKING LOT, AND SIDEWALKS ON AN EXISTING SITE WITH A BANK IN EDINA. MINNESOTA. PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN IS NOT REQUIRED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BECAUSE THERE WILL BE A REDUCTION IN IMPERVIOUS AREA TO THE SITE AS A RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. THIS PROJECT IS NOT REOUIRED TO MEET THE MPG PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE THE DISTURBED AREA IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND THE INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE. -THIS PROJECT DISCHARGES TO CORNELIA LAKE - THIS LAKE IS IDENTIFIED AS AN IMPAIRED WATER ON THE MPG'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST FOR NUTRIENT/EUTRIPHOCATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS. THESE IMPAIRMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE TREATED AS PART OF THE NPDES PERMIT. -N /A DRINKING WATER SUPPLY ANAL M NT R A- -N/A THE PROJECT STORMWATER DISCHARGE IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO IMPACT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: - OUTSTANDING RESOURCE VALUE WATERS, TROUT WATERS, WETLANDS, CALCAREOUS FENS. PROPERTIES LISTED BY THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES THE PROJECT STORMWATER DISCHARGE IS NOT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL REGULATION DUE TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: -OTHER FORM/LL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPPI IMPLEMENTATION R SPONSIBI M S• 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON -SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION f R TH I I N TRAINING 0 ESE INDIVIDUAL (S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH )THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER PART III, F.1 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT. THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. THE FOLLOWING SIZING CRITERIA APPLY TO THE DESIGN OF STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES. N/A INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE OR NOT CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. 1. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS: N/A 2. PERMANENT WET SEDIMENTATION BASINS: N/A 3. PERMANENT INFILTRATION /FILTRATION : MINIMUM OF 3,226 CUBIC FEET OF INFILTRATION VOLUME 4. PERMANENT REGIONAL PONDS: N/A 5. ALTERNATIVE METHODS: N/A THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE DESCRIBES, IN GENERAL, THE WORK ON THE SITE: I. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED AND /OR OBTAIN THE NECESSARY PERMITS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE INSPECTIONS, RECORD KEEPING AND RECORD RETENTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMITS. 3. CONTRACTOR SMALL INSTALL ALL PERIMETER AND DOWN- GRADIENT EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BLIPS). CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PRIOR TO SITE GRADING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING OR DISTURBING EXISTING VEGETATIVE COVER. t. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ( SWPPP). 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MONITOR AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMPS AS SHOWN ON PLANS & IN CONFORMANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT, CONTINUOUSLY DURING THE WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOILS NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS THAT ARE NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. 7. CONTRACTOR SWILL PERFORM SITE RESTORATION ACTIVITIES FOR PERMANENT VEGETATIVE ESTABLISHMENT. S. CONTRACTOR SMALL REMOVE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT). 2. SUBMIT NOTICE OF TERMINATION TO MPCA WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FINAL STABILIZATION. I. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS: ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SMALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORNWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ( SWPPP). A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF -SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: A THE CONTRACTOR SHILL ATTEMPT TO PHASE ALL WORK TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND MAINTAIN VEGETATIVE COVER TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED ON THE SITE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. B. STABILIZATION ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION ACTNRY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7 CALENDAR DAYS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES WITH SIGNIFICANT SILT. CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS. C. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH THAT DRAINS WATER FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND A SITE MUST BE STABILIZED BY CONTRACTOR WITHIN 200 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCH SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED UNTIL THEY ARE NO LONGER USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, AFTER WHICH TNFY MIM PF STAPTI 17Fn WrtNIN IA NnI IRS D. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. E. THE CONTRACTOR MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS OF THE SITE IN ORDER TO INCREASE SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND MAXIMIZE INFILTRATION UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST UTILIZE VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES IF NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION WHEN DIRECTING STORMWATER TO VEGETATED AREAS. 3. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: A CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROLS BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT DISTURBANCE BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PERIMETER CONTROLS UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GRADING AND BMP INSTALLATION TO LIMIT ALL SLOPES OF 3HAV OR STEEPER TO AN UNBROKEN LENGTH OF 75 FEET OR LESS. C. IF DOWN GRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE OVERLOADING. THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESES ADDITIONAL PRACTICES. D. TIMING AND INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES CAN BE ADJUSTED BY CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT -TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING AND GRUBBING OR VEHICLE PASSAGE. ANY SHORT -TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY 5 COMPLETED AND IN ALL CASES PRIOR TO THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT. E. ALL STORM SEWER INLETS AND OUTLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CONTRACTOR WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING THE WORK. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE POTENTIAL SOURCES FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT TO INLETS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED BY CONTRACTOR. F. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS. SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. ALL SOIL STOCKPILES THAT REMAIN UNDISTURBED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN 7 DAYS SWILL BE PROTECTED BY CONTRACTOR WITH COVER OF MULCH, EROSION CONTROL AMTS, OR PLASTIC SHEETING. G. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING OFF SITE. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE TRACKING FROM SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STREET SWEEPING AS NECESSARY IF BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. H. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT. I. CONTRACTOR MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOPSOIL. UNLESS INFEASIBLE. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. J. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR PROVIDE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. K. IF POLYMERS. FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS ARE USED ON SITE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS. a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE TREATMENT. CHEMICALS MAY ONLY BE APPLIED WHERE TREATED STORMWATER IS DIRECTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. D. CHEMICALS MUST BE SELECTED THAT ARE APPROPRIATELY SUITED TO THE TYPES OF SOILS LIKELY TO BE EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CHEMICALS MUST BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. AND WITH DOSING SPECIFICATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. 4. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS: A CONTRACTOR'S DEWATERING ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE SEDIMENT-LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED INTO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE, OTHERWISE R MUST BE DISCHARGED THROUGH SOME FORM OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) BY CONTRACTOR TO LIMIT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE. PRIOR TO DISCHARGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A VISUAL TEST TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT IS OBTAINED IN THE BASIN OR BMP AND APPLY ADDITIONAL TREATMENT AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCHARGE WATER FROM DEWATERING IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS. THE DISCHARGE WATER SHALL BE DISPERSED OVER AN ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURE AND NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. C. IF CONTRACTOR IS USING FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL. RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. S. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE: A. WHEN INSPECTIONS FIND EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS THAT ARE NONFUNCTIONAL, ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY OR OTHERWISE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PLACE ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DEEMED NECESSARY BY MPCA WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM MPCA. B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE SITE ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. C. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING BY CONTRACTOR AND RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP BY CONTRACTOR. MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR IN CONFORMANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR'S RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: a. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION. D. NAME OF PERSON CONDUCTING INSPECTION. c. FINDING OF INSPECTION INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION. 0. DETAILS OF CORRECTIVE ACTON TAKEN (DATE. TIME. PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES). e. DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. I. IF ANY DISCHARGE IS OBSERVED TO BE OCCURRING DURING THE INSPECTION, A RECORD OF ALL POINTS OF THE PROPERTY FROM WHICH THERE IS A DISCHARGE MUST BE MADE, AND THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE DESCRIBED (COLOR, ODOR, FLOATING, SETTLED, OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER INDICATORS) AND PHOTOGRAPHED. p. DOCUMENTATION OF CHANGES MADE TO SWPPP. D. IN AREAS OF PROJECT WHERE FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE A MONTH. THESE AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY CONTRACTOR FOR MINIMUM PERIOD OF 12 NON -WINTER MONTHS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF FIRST SPRING RUNOFF OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING ANY WINTER STOPPAGE, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. E. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE, OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABUUTION AND AN NOT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. F. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED BY CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO THE DEVILS INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW. G. ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN THEY BECOME NON - FUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE -HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE DEVICE THAT IS NONFUNCTIONAL BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW. M. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR ONCE THE SEDIMENT COLLECTED REACHES ONE HALF THE STORAGE VOLUME WITH 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW. I. ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITS WITHIN SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES MUST BE REMOVED AND RESTABILIZED BY CONTRACTOR WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY, INCLUDING DELTAS AND STORM SEWER SEDIMENT DEPOSITS. THE CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED, IF NECESSARY, FOR SUCH SEDIMENT REMOVAL. J. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING EXISTING PAVED SURFACES CLEAN OF SEDIMENT. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE CHECKED DAILY BY CONTRACTOR. IF THE ENTRANCE BECOMES INUNDATED WITH SEDIMENT, THE ENTRANCE WILL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED AS APPROPRIATE BY CONTRACTOR. STREETS LEADING TO AND FROM THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE CHECKED DAILY BY CONTRACTOR FOR OFF -SITE SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. THESE AREAS WILL BE SWEPT CLEAN OF ANY TRACKED MATERIALS BY CONTRACTOR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. CONTRACTOR SWILL EXTEND SWEEPING TO THE EXTREMITY OF ANY SEDIMENT TRACKING THAT OCCURS OFF -SITE. K. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE ANY OFF -SITE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE OFF -STFE IMPACTS. L. ALL INFILTRATION /FILTRATION AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED BY CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION IS ACCUMULATING OVER THE INFILTRATION /FILTRATION AREA. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED OVER INFILTRATION /FILTRATION MUST BE REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR. M. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT INFILTRATION /FILTRATION AREAS FROM SEDIMENTATION AND OVER - COMPACTION. DURING EXCAVATION, SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE UTILIZED BY CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND THE AREA MUST BE STAKED OFF AND MARKED SO THAT HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WILL NOT COMPACT THE SOIL. N. INSPECTIONS CAN BE SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS UNTIL FIRST RUNOFF OCCURS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES RESUME. 6. POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE: A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF ALL PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, AND WASTES FROM STORMWATER WHICH MAY BE A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE NOT DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. B. BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT MAY LEACH POLLUTANTS MUST BE UNDER COVER (PLASTIC SHEETING, TEMPORARY ROOFS, ETC.) TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS OR PROTECTED BY A SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. C. PESTICIDES. HERBICIDES. INSECTICIDES. FERTILIZERS. TREATMENT CHEMICALS. AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER (PLASTIC SHEETING, TEMPORARY ROOFS, ETC.) TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS OR PROTECTED BY A SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. D. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. TOXIC WASTE. (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL. GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM -BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) MUST BE STORED W SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL STATE REQUIREMENTS. E. SOLID WASTE MUST BE STORED. COLLECTED, AND DISPOSED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL STATE REOUIREMENTS. F. PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT BE TIPPED OVER. SANITARY WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE REQUIREMENTS. G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ALL AREAS WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONDUCT FUELING IN A CONTAINED AREA UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD 6 AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. ALL SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP AND REPORTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS. DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES SHALL BE USED WHERE POSSIBLE. H. THE CONTRACTOR MUST LIMIT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING TO A DEFINED AREA WHEN COMPLETED ON THE PROJECT SITE. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA MUST BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ONSITE. I. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. NO WASH W MAY CONTACT THE GROUND AND THE CONTAINMENT MUST BE WASHOUT WASTES CO E DESIGNED SO THAT R DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL MPG RULES. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY THAT REQUIRES SITE PERSONNEL TO UTILIZE PROPER FACILITIES FOR DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES. 7. FINAL STABILIZATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING: A ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE AND A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70% OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. INCLUDING STABIUZATON OF ALL DITCHES AND SWALES. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ARE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC AND STRUCTURAL BMPS. D. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENTS FROM STORM WATER CONVEYANCES AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY BASINS. RECORD AVALABLITY AND RETENTION: -THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE SWPPP. INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, REPORTS. RECORDS, OR OTHER INFORMATION OF THE PERMIT, AVAILABLE TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL OFFICIALS WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PERMIT AND FOR THREE YEARS FOLLOWING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. -THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE RESPONSIBLE PERSON, TRAINED AS REQUIRED BY THIS PERMIT, AVAILABLE ON SITE WITHIN 72 HOURS WHEN REQUESTED BY THE MPG FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION. INSPECTION AND ENTRY: -THE CONTRACTOR MUST ALLOW ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MPCA OR ANY MEMBER THEREOF WHEN AUTHORIZED BY IT. TO ENTER UPON THE PROJECT SIZE FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING INFORMATION, EXAMINATION OF RECORDS, OR CONDUCTING SURVEYS OR INVESTIGATIONS. NOTICE OF TERMINATION: - PERMITTEE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS IF ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: 1. FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES SUCH AS SILT FENCE. 2. ANOTHER OWNER HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OVER ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION. CHANGES TO SWPPP -THE PERMITTEE MUST AMEND THE SWPPP AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS, DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER; 1. THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION OR MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAVE SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE. INSPECTION IS REQUIRED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN ONE -HALF INCH. 2. INSPECTION OR INVESTIGATION BY SITE OPERATORS, LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE. 3. THE SWPPP IS NOT ACHIEVING THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT. 4. THE MPCA DETERMINES THAT DISCHARGE MAY CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO NON- ATTAINMENT OF ANY APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OR THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCORPORATE THE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL). SWPPP CERTIFICATION: - THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WAS PREPARED BY INDIVIDUAL(S) TRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERMIT'S TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION OF SWPPPS. INDIVIDUAL(S) PREPARING THIS SWPPP: PREPARED BY KEVIN GARDNER. P.E. TRAINING /CERTIFICATION: DATE OF TRAINING /CERTIFICATION: SEPTEMBER 16 -17, 2013 PIERCE PINI AND ASSOCIATES PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA KEVINOPIERCEPINLCOM DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPP 763 -537 -1311 LOCATION: ARDEN HILLS. MN 62PASIC "., INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN ' •f '7J CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION: 2017 CONTACT INFORMATION OWNER & LONG TERM MAINTENANCE CONTACT PERSON: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR BUSINESS: X CONTACT PERSON: X ADDRESS: X X TELEPHONE: X EMAIL: X CONTRACTOR'S ONSITE REPRESENTATIVE BUSINESS: CONTACT PERSON: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: NOTE: CONTRACTOR'S ONSITE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE COMPLETED ON THE PLAN SET KEPT IN THE CONSTRUCTION TRAILER. THIS INFORMATION SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER AND CARL ENGINEER. . r A -j 5�1- flACFIAUEq �PPFK. I I. _...: „t. 0.57 ACRES EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.33 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 62PASIC "., 098ow tQV717H _ ' •f '7J INLET PROTECTION 67 R 0ge Da:: I 1Y . '6RDNannle Ffoapllalj� 1 ^ I� i 3330 W 66th St 1 S f 61 $$BleCenler I SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE ACREAGE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA 0.90 ACRES EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.57 ACRES EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.33 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.52 ACRES PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.38 ACRES SOIL ASSOCIATION HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP SILTY SAND B/C ESTIMATED BMP OUANTITIES SILT FENCE 835 LF WE PROTECTION FENCING 900 LF ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 75 CY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 400 SY CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 1 EACH INLET PROTECTION 8 EACH SEED MULCH 0.4 ACRES NOTE: OUAWTTIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT OUANTMES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELY ON THESE QUANTITIES FOR THEIR BID AND CARL ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR COST ESTIMATES OR ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 66 West Apartments 3330 66171 St. West, Edina URBANWORKS SDI NORTH THIRD STREET. SUITE 146 NNNENPOUS, MN 55401 512.466.3100 CONSULTANT PIERCE PINI ASSOCIATES 4soalmNwlaeArenx we.w OG PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE PROJECT • PHASE DRANRJ 13Y CHECKED BY 06.16.2014 14-021 XXX DA( KTG STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C301 IIwNN o X11] wwe.nAaswaom.. uc ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING 6525 BARRIE ROAD I I I r3l A I I ! °I L 18 6 9 .s, ryp1II� � I,B a U F 3 I Q I I I I I ®a aBD.9B LLj I n I I ; e Q Ml IT I I{`i'ty — t \IA1t6 1. WET TAP EXISTING 10" DIP WATERMAIN AND INSTALL NEW 6" DIP FIRE SERVICE AND POST INDICATOR VALVE, SEE DETAIL 6 /C600. 2. EXISTING 2' COPPER WATER SERVICE PER ORIGINAL BUILDING PLANS, FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATI AND SIZE. EXISTING 2" SERVICE TO BE USED FOR DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY. SEE MECHANICAL. 3. REMOVE EXISTING 4' SANITARY SERVICE AND INSTALL NEW 6' PVC SANITARY SERVICE 4. EXISTING 8' PVC INV = 872.77, NEW 6' PVC INV - 872.86 5. INSTALL 55 LF 6' PVC SDR -26 SANITARY SEWER AT 1.20% 6. NEW 6' PVC SANITARY INV = 873.52, COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANIC 7. INSTALL ATRIUM DRAIN IN WINDOW WELL. RIM - 878.5. INV - 877.00, SEE DETAIL B/C600 B. INSTALL 29 LF 8' PVC STORM SEWER AT 1.00% 9. INSTALL ATRIUM DRAIN IN WINDOW WELL. RIM _ 878.5, INV _ 876.71, SEE DETAIL 9/C600 10. INSTALL 12 LF 8' PVC STORM SEWER AT 1.00% 11. INSTALL 24' DIAMETER NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN WITH SOLID LID. RIM _ 884.2. INV _ 876.59. SUMP - 875.59. SEE SHEET C602. 12. INSTALL 49 LF S' PVC STORM SEWER AT 1.00% 13. INSTALL 24' DIAMETER NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN WITH SOLID LID. RIM _ 883.3, INV - 876.10, SUMP _ 875.10. SEE SHEET 0602. 14. INSTALL 30 LF 8' PVC STORM SEWER AT 1.00%. BORE OR JACK PIPE UNDER BRICK SIDEWALK EXISTI NG SIDEWALK TO REMAIN OPEN DURING CONSTRUCTION. 15. CORE DRILL NEW NORTH INVERT INTO EXISTING CATCH BASIN. INV _ 875.80. m'� ZTo� �3 L y 5/ w w III 9DEW w w w w w w ,J 50EW.1. lvEr+wv�vn r G 1-1 ry ALL)E' LPO conrnE,E nvBpu D.° B >D.sb s 005,0 15 I o O,M WEST 66TH STREET 11 BE, snm a , alp BBD,. Alw BBD B. �B� B75T, B r .60 E- ' Nwv BsS39 E -w 5 S—J ss SSrvv/ ss ss 55 s5 EP SS BB �ss NORTH ® 40 UTILITY PLAN r -2o' 0 20' 40' 60• PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina URBANWORKS 001 NORTH THIRD STET, SURE 146 MINNEAPOU9,MN 55401 812456.9100 CON&1LTANT PIERCE PINI & A550CIATE5 4sopmEaAVEicanBm a44c�aa1 wtv.� PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CON$iAUCT10N REVISIONS 0 ON. D..dpbm DATE 66.16.2614 PROJECT 14@1 PHASE XXX DRAWN BY WX CHECKED BY KTG UTILITY PLAN C400 aeor�pW O mll erue.nenaAiw.n.. uc ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING 6525 BARRIE ROAD ♦ 1 © _ - -- r 4 ^ ♦ nv�ir• �0' '��i'i�`�°6, I 3 4 5 9 10 1) 1. SURMOUNTABLE CURB. MATCH EXISTING STYLE AND ELEVATION WITHIN RIGHT —OF —WAY 14 11 ~ § 2. 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL 3/C601 0 2 3. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON, SEE DETAIL 5 /C6C0 4. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL 1 /C600 _nFKTw — a S. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE DETAIL 4 /C600 _ 4 61 CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL 2 /C600 6 7 - 15 7. SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR BIKE RACK SLEEVE LOCATIONS a a F I 8. PARKING LOT STRIPING. 4- YELLOW EPDXY PAINT, TYPICAL 9. BASKETBALL COURT STRIPING, 4' WHITE EPDXY PAINT � P 5 10. ADA PARKING SYMBOL, SEE DETAIL 7 /C600 jII" �P to J 11. ADA PARKING SIGN, SEE DETAIL 8 /C600 C i 12. TAPER CURB FLUSH WITH DRIVEWAY APRON Q ^� O 13. EXTERIOR STAIRS, SEE LANDSCAPING 14. PEDESTRIAN RAMP, SEE DETAIL 5 /C600 I 5 w I Q `max eeaee s 15. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR STAIR DETAILS 16. SEE LANDSCAPING FOR WINDOW WELL MATERIAL ELI Q $ m I Om %B0 54 N: O ,a 8 wv e�c.JZ x -s w0 4 56� i 55 JunPEa baas6, 6 I 18 I ,x,.acx i LL ®� 57126, sq5 QOM 6,626x6 e "h 1 o22' ELI �g 5 s n M x wO �5 13 l ,s " _ _ _ _ w ` w - (vfwnF so cwaS. w ' w n - - - w w w x cn s.ocwel. / v0 -177 nvnw � I s7 B 0 eeoo,x. WEST 66TH STREET -1 a,s.z x save / w d i � A x o ( m.nss b NORTH � PRELIMINARY ® PAVING PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 50 1"-20' 0 20' 40' 60' 66 West Apartments 3330 68th St. Wag, Edina uweas 901 NORTH THIRD STREET. SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 012.455.310D )NBULTAINT PIERCE PINI & A550CIATE5 smmvaAl2aea�na s.uclw ■01 ,NNJen,m >v.,r PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISKX4S i DM Do-"m DRAWN BY DX CHECKED BY KTG PAVING PLAN mox4M 0 C500 WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT, BY CALCULATION ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH BY ACCEPTED DESIGN PRACTICES WITH HOG RINGS, PER MNDOT PERCENT SPEC. SECTION 3686 81. SILT FENCE STORAGE EQUALS 2 FT FOR A 2 -YEAR EVENT OR 3 FT FOR A 100 -YEAR EVENT METAL (OR WOOD) SILT FENCE 100:1 POSE OR STAKE FABRIC I 400 FT FABRIC ANCHORAGE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS TRENCH BACKFILL 50:1 WITH TAMPED 1. SILT FENCES SHOULD BE INSTALLED ON NATURAL SOIL THE CONTOUR (AS OPPOSED TO UP AND 25:1 DOWN A HILL) AND CONSTRUCTED SO DIRECTION OF THAT ROW CANNOT BYPASS THE ENDS. RUNOFF FLOW IMF 2. ENSURE THAT THE DRAINAGE AREA IS NO 5% GREATER THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FT OF 180 FT FENCE. 6- 6' 3. MAKE THE FENCE STABLE FOR THE -_ - - MIN 10 -YEAR PEN( STORM RUNOFF. NATURAL SOIL -_TT 4. WHERE ALL RUNOFF IS TO BE STORED B% BEHIND THE SILT FENCE. ENSURE THAT NOTE: S F SILT FENCE SHALL FOLLOW THE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH BEHIND MILT SPEC. SECTION 3886. THE FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED THE 40 FT SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN N TABLE 1, FIGURE 1 TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE 5:1 TABLE 1 MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH AND SLOPE FOR WHICH SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE DETAIL C60 NO SCALE 10' MIN LENGTH INSTALL SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ( MNDOT TYPE 6). COIR LOG 6' -7' EQUIVALENT MATERIAL MAY BE MINIMUM DNMETER \ SUBSTITUTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER. STAKE DRIVEN THROUGH LOG 1/3 OF MESH 2/3 OF LOG 4 COIR LOG (jQ NO SCALE s GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 60 NO SCALE INSERT I` * OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SHALL 811 PLACED IN THE POUCH ON THE BOTTOM. ATTACH PILLOW TO TETHER LOOP CATCHBA.SIN MANHOLE 1. OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SMALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WHEN NEAR SATURATION. 2. USE DANDY BAG 110 AS MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS. INC. 3. AN EGUIVALENT CATCHBASIN EROSION CONTROL INSERT METHOD OR PRODUCT MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER. K_2- CB INSERT EROSION CONTROL C60 NO SCALE BY CALCULATION BY CALCULATION BY ACCEPTED DESIGN PRACTICES SLOPE H:V PERCENT SILT FENCE STORAGE EOUALES 2 FT FOR A 100 -YEAR EVENT SILT FENCE STORAGE EQUALS 2 FT FOR A 2 -YEAR EVENT OR 3 FT FOR A 100 -YEAR EVENT MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH 100:1 1% 400 FT 900 FT 100 FT 50:1 2% 200 FT 450 FT 75 FT 25:1 4% 100 FT 225 FT 75 FT 20:1 5% 80 FT 180 FT 75 -50 FT 17:1 6% 67 FT 150 FT 50 FT 12.5:1 B% 50 FT 112 FT 50 FT 10:1 10% 40 FT 90 FT 50 -25 FT 5:1 20% 20 FT 45 FT 25 -15 FT 4:1 25% 16 FT 36 FT 15 FT 3:1 33% 12 FT 27 FT 15 FT 2:1 50% 8 FT 18 FT 15 FT HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE DETAIL C60 NO SCALE 10' MIN LENGTH INSTALL SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ( MNDOT TYPE 6). COIR LOG 6' -7' EQUIVALENT MATERIAL MAY BE MINIMUM DNMETER \ SUBSTITUTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER. STAKE DRIVEN THROUGH LOG 1/3 OF MESH 2/3 OF LOG 4 COIR LOG (jQ NO SCALE s GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 60 NO SCALE INSERT I` * OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SHALL 811 PLACED IN THE POUCH ON THE BOTTOM. ATTACH PILLOW TO TETHER LOOP CATCHBA.SIN MANHOLE 1. OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SMALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WHEN NEAR SATURATION. 2. USE DANDY BAG 110 AS MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS. INC. 3. AN EGUIVALENT CATCHBASIN EROSION CONTROL INSERT METHOD OR PRODUCT MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER. K_2- CB INSERT EROSION CONTROL C60 NO SCALE UNDISTURBED SOIL -1 1 11 I BLOCK -�- -POST INDICATOR INDICATOR VALVE VALVE PER CITY NO SCALE REQUIREMENTS SLOPE TO DRAIN 0.9 �I II II C AGATE VALVE BOX 8' -0' 1.1 EXTENDED 3 PIECE p: 'G' BOX NO. 6 ROUND BASE. 5 1/4' SHAFT -I SEWER AND DRAIN RISER PIPE BUFFALO BOX 1� I�NDS (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) OR APPROVED IZ 6.1 EQUIVALENT 10' NDS SANITARY SEWER AND DRAIN 9.5 5.2 12' ELBOW OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 13.7 7.4 AGATE VALVE SEWER AND DRAIN PIPE TIE VALVE TO TEE ON MAIN WITH (2) 3/4' DWAETER TIE RODS UNDISTURBED SOIL -1 1 11 I BLOCK e POST INDICATOR VALVE (Q NO SCALE NDS ATRIUM POLYOLEFIN GRATE WITH U.V. SLOPE TO DRAIN 0.9 INHIBITORS OR APPROVED EOUILALENT SLOPE TO DRAIN AI-- 1.1 - COMPACTED 501E 1L�L ��11_II Tm� 6' -I SEWER AND DRAIN RISER PIPE u 1.9 I�NDS (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) OR APPROVED 4.3 6.1 EQUIVALENT 10' NDS SANITARY SEWER AND DRAIN 9.5 5.2 12' ELBOW OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 13.7 7.4 SEWER AND DRAIN PIPE s ATRIUM GRATE WITH ELBOW C60 NO SCALE EXTEND MATERIAL ABOUT 40' ON TOP OF THE GROUND AND RANDOMLY INSERT STAPLES THROUGH THE MATERIAL ABOUT 20/ APART -*`/ STAPLES AT 3' O.0 STAPLES MUST BE INSERTED THROUGH OVERLAP MATERIAL TRANSVERSE SEAMS: - BLANKET MATERIAL MUST OVERLAP AT LEAST 6' AND STAPLES INSERTED THROUGH BOTH FABRICS AT A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 20' APART LONGITUDINAL RIAL SEMIS: ;r i BLANKET MATE MUST AT END OF SLOPE OVERLAP AT LEAST 6' AND SECURE BLANKET STAPLES INSERTED THROUGH MATERIAL BY INSERTING BOTH FABRICS AT A STAPLES ABOUT 20' MAXIMUM SPACING OF 40' APART THROUGH THE NOTES: APART FABRIC 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO BE CATEGORY 4- COCONUT 2S FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1 AND SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ALL DRAINAGE SWALES AND PONDING AREAS AND CATEGORY 2 -STRAW 2S FOR ALL SLOPES LESS THAN 5:1 PER MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 3885. 2. INSTALL PER AINDOT SPEC. SECTION 2575 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET C( NO SCALE 3000 psi O 28 DAYS BEARING AREA OF BLOCK IN SO. FT. FITTING SIZE TEE & END 90 BEND 45* BEND 3' 0.6 0.9 0.5 4' 1.1 1.5 0.8 6' 2.4 3.4 1.9 8' 4.3 6.1 3.3 10' 6.7 9.5 5.2 12' 9.7 13.7 7.4 NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR MAY PROVIDE 'MEGALUG' JOINT RESTRAINT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS. TIE MINIMUM 3 JOINTS EACH SIDE OF FITTING. 71TYPICAL THRUST BLOCK DETAIL !29V NO SCALE 9 ATRIUM GRATE WITH TEE fjQ NO SCALE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West. Edina UREiANWORKS 901 NORTH THIRD STREET. SUITE 146 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 912.466.9100 CONSULTANT PIERCE PIN & ASSOCIATES 4s avEw �eme4u 11a1om.mi lluuemr.ml PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REMCNS Dms Dea.W. DATE 06.15.2M4 PROJECT • 14421 PHASE XXX DRAWN BY DIK CI-IECKED BY KTG CIVIL DETAILS C600 mlmp4 o mu glaenwb wwem. uc NDS ATRIUM POLYOLEFIN GRATE WITH V.V. SLOPE TO _DRAIN INHIBITORS OR APPROVED EOUILALENT SLOPE TO DRAIN - - SOIL - -1 -NOS SEWER AND DRAIN RISER PIPE W --r-COMPACTED - (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT DS SANITARY SEWER AND DRAIN E OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SEWER AMD DRAIN PIPE 9 ATRIUM GRATE WITH TEE fjQ NO SCALE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West. Edina UREiANWORKS 901 NORTH THIRD STREET. SUITE 146 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 912.466.9100 CONSULTANT PIERCE PIN & ASSOCIATES 4s avEw �eme4u 11a1om.mi lluuemr.ml PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REMCNS Dms Dea.W. DATE 06.15.2M4 PROJECT • 14421 PHASE XXX DRAWN BY DIK CI-IECKED BY KTG CIVIL DETAILS C600 mlmp4 o mu glaenwb wwem. uc 2" BITUMINOUS BINDING COURSE MNDOT 2360, (SPNW8330B) -2' BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MNDOT 2360 (SPWEA3409) �&TUMINOUS TACK COAT 6' COMPACTED CUSS 5 PER MNDOT 2357 BASE (1008 CRUSHED) MNDOT 3138 F' COMPACTED SUBGRADE PERT GE07ECHNICAL REPORT C'*�BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL C60 NO SCALE CONCRETE WALK LAYOUT WITH BOULEVARD. 4" 4" CLASS a OR APPROVED EQUAL 0" 7' UNREINFORCED ' . . • . . . PORTLAND CEMENT , CONCRETE SLAB 6' COMPACTED CLASS 5 BASE (100% CRUSHED MNDOT 3138 III III- �l III_III III„ 11�F71iF-,=� COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NOTES: PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' O.C. MAX. IN BOTH DIRECTIONS 2 CONCRETE PAVEMENT C6O NO SCALE O�RI ,1�3�:. � SEE PLANS FOR PLACEMENT OF MAIK AND 1' ROUNDED UP DIMENSIONS FOR CONSMUICTIOH OF DRIVEWAYS CURB RETURN, HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE 1D 1/2' EXPANSION JOINT. 1/2- PREFORMED JOINT (2' EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE FBlIIR MATERIAL AASHTO M 213 MEW6ED WHEN BLVD. WITH 5' WALK.) 2 CONCRETE AREAS ARE POURED SEPARATELY). DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT O 1/2' EXPANSION JOINTS AT 160 FT. TYP. (APPROX) MAXIMUM INTERVALS. 1' ROUNDED LIP LASLOPE �� 10% MAX % S1OPE 3 MATCH NPIACE DRIVEWAY THICKNESS (0' MOL ON 0ONCRETQ (4 MIN. ON BR. DRIVEWAYS). 0.06 FT./fT. SLOPE'_ 1 _____ _ 114" R J,--- n M © VA SIDEWALK, e' CONCKEIE PAVED TO THE BACK OF SIDEWALK 9 PAID FOR AS W ATE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT. P . 7• 6 SEE MNDOT STANDARD PRATE 7030 FOR PED RAMP DETAILS O O'CONC PVMT SEE PLANS FOR PLACEMENT FORM D NE PRODUCE O APPROXIMATELY PANELS MAX AREA SECTION A -A OF 04 $s.). REQUIRED O SEE STD. PLATE 400 FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS *APRON CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE TROWELED eQ FOR RETROFITTED APRON, STREET MUST BE SAWED ter ION. OUT FROM NEW APRON AND PATCHED WTH A PLANT AND MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY PATTERN. OTHER MIXED BITUMINOUS MDrRIRE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY JOINT PATTERN AND STYLE. EL 0 THE FCST PAN OF SIDEWALK ON EACH SIDE OF ANY DRIVEWAY O SHALL BE W CONCRETE PAVFAONT. BIT DRIVEWAYS SHALL HAVE B' Or MASS 5 BASE AND BE PLACED IN TWO 2" LIFTS 14 n.,y CITY OF EDINA CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON REVISED: O�� T �� e m E& INEERIING D CONC A STANDARD a���� WORKS 410 PLATE qa "' DEPTS. AP OVED: On ENOREE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON C60 NO SCALE BITUMINOUS PAVING AND 12' 2' 6' AGGREGATE BASE. SEE 1 /2.1 PAVING PLAN 3' R GRAI � 1/2' R - io ? . O Cl, �• 1 1 3 SLOPE PER GRADING PLAN- CONCRETE %iCURB & GUTTER (B612) C6O NO SCALE A, PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP 11" (TYP )1 507, -655 OF L# BASE DIAMETER /d' ') "® ME SPACING PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMF WALK WIDTH PER PLAN 1 /4' /FT. SLOPE ON- REINFORCED CONCRETE WALK COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE OMPACTED SUBGRADE SECTION 1/4-R 1/4'R TYPICAL = TYPICAL 3 JOINT FILLER FULL DEPTH SAWC OF WALK OR TOOL CONTRACTION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT AT 5. O.C. MAXIMUM AT 20' O.C. MAXIMUM 4 CONCRETE WALK & JOINT DETAILS \C 6O NO SCALE NOTE: TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). ALL STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THIS STANDARD PLATE. 1. f INCH PERFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M213. 2. WHEN POSSIBLE, PROVIDE A CLEAR PATH OF TRAVEL 4' -0' WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4' X 4' WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. NO SIGNALS. SIGNS. CABINETS. OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS ARE ALLOWED IN THE RAMP OF PATH OF TRAVEL 3. PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS (TRUNCATED DOMES) AT THE BACK OF CURB. WHEN THE DETECTABLE SHALL BE HAND FORMED TO FILL THE GAP. 4. ADA REOUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2' -0' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT (GRAY OR BUFF) COLOR WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A DARK COLOR (RED OR DARK GRAY) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO STATE STATUTES SEE SIGN B DETAIL DESIGNATED VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL SIGNS: BLUE WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER ON ON BLUE BACKGROUND, WHITE — REFLEC70RIZED WHITE PARKING METAL SIGN TO -VEHICLE ID MATCH SIGN ABOVE BLUE REQUIRED 2' GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE T•_n• W TO SM FM FOR VIOLATION 1 0'1:12' vMK ALCSHE ` I I CONCRETE WALK. I SEE PLAN �- C I `• 18.6' 1 X12' DIAMETER CONCRETE FOOTING SIGN DETAIL I � II I I LJ r e ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL C6O1 NO SCALE GRASS - BUFFER STRIP , SYMBOL s� 7 HC PARKING SYMBOL C!O1 NO SCALE 'LANTING PER PLAN PLANTING MEDIUM /INFILTRATION MEDIUM SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN SAND, 30% COMPOST MIXTURE. WELL BLENDED, SEE SPECIFICATIONS SLOPE 1 ' 3: MA% i V AC ,N C4TV1Y UNDISTURBED AND III III III' UNDISTU TED INSITU SOIL ig"'\RAIN GARDEN C60 NO SCALE 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina URBANWORKS SDI NORTH THIRD STREET. SUITE 146 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 66401 612.466.3100 CONSULTANT PIERCE PINI 8z ASSOCIATES 4smnxa.relcrMlem MIME1w Mel 1610 ®,IN, fY1M®.1L1 PRIEUMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISK)NS 4 Dft D..". DATE 06.162014 PROJECT • 14-021 PHASE XXX DRAVVN BY DM OHEC(ED BY KTG CIVIL DETAILS tr C601 m01�A4 G Alt b/ U�NCb4dY�n NL NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN WITH SOLID COVER (1, 2) INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRON FRAME & COVER TO MATCH BASIN O.D. MINIMUM PIPE BURIAL DEPTH PER PIPE w (3) VARIABLE INVERT HEIGHTS MANUFACTURER MATERIAL AVAILABLE (ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDATION DATE 8.14.07 PLANSITAKE OFF) (MIN. MANUFACTURING (5) ADAPTER www [glad -w ct REQ. SAME AS MIN. SUMP) ANGLES TITLE REPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATION VARIABLE 0' - 3% CONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ACCORDING TO r& PLANS (4) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET ADAPTERS AVAILABLE: 4' - 30' FOR CORRUGATED HOPE (ADS N- 12NiANCOR DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCOR SINGLE WALL), N -12 HP, PVC SEWER (EX SDR 35), PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40), PVC C900/C905, CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVC WATERTIGHT JOINT (CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN) 1 - 8' - 30' SOLID COVERS SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 7050-05. 2 - '12. - 30' FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 705-05 0. 8' 810' SOLID COVERS FIT DIRECTLY ONTO DRAIN BASINS WITH THE USE OF A PVC BODY TOP. SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-11D-045. 3 - DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS. RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84' DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. SEE DRAWING NO. 7001- 110-065. 4 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N- 120UWCOR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP, & PVC SEWER (4' - 241. 5 - ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0' TO 360'. TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-012. 6 - 12"- 30' SOLID COVERS SHALL MEET H-20 LOAD RATING. 7 - 8'& 10' SOLID COVERS ARE RATED FOR LIGHT DUTY APPLICATIONS ONLY; NO CONCRETE COLLAR NEEDED FOR LIGHT DUTY RATING. 8--30- 18' MIN WIDTH GUIDELINE 8' MIN THICKNESS GUIDELINE (6, 7) TRAFFIC LOADS: CONCRETE SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR GUIDELINE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL CONCRETE SLAB MUST BE DESIGNED TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS, TRAFFIC LOADING, & OTHER APPLICABLE DESIGN FACTORS. SEE DRAWING NO. 70DI- 110.111 FOR NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION. (3) VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH ACCORDING TO PLANS (6' MIN. ON 8' - 24',10' MIN. ON 30' 4' MIN ON 8'- 24' BASED ON MANUFACTURING REQ.) 6' MIN ON 30' THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS II MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICH NYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPT DRAWN BY EBC MATERIAL 3130 VERONA AVE BUFORD, GA 30518 OR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER, TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN OR DATE 8.14.07 PHN FAX � ) 932 -2480 Nylo last' TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN www [glad -w ct REVISED BY EBC PROJECT NOJNANE TITLE REPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS DATE 3-%10 DRAIN BASIN WITH SOLID COVER QUICK SPEC INSTALLATION DETAIL IS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST. owlo NnORAST 1 DWG SDI A I SCALE 1:40 SHEET I GF 1 1 DWG NO. 7001 - 110.288 REV B 66 West Apartments 3330 68th St. West, Edina UR13ANWORKS 001 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 146 IANNEnPOOS,.M %W 0124ai.31W CONSUITAM PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES ®m .�K-- KME,e T!M PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV00148 Date DWMWm DATE 0e.15.m14 PROJECT* 14021 PHASE loac DRAWN BY Dl( CHECKED BV KTG CIVIL DETAILS PRELIMINARY C602 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WEST 66TH STREET 2 STORY WEST 65TH STREET FAMILY ISING 'ORY SOUTHDALE CENTER MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STORY MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STORY I_ MULTIFAMILY HOUSING ^ 2 STORY W Q Uo 9 COMMERCIAL U 6 STORY F o w � I COMMERCIAL I 3 STORY COMMERCIAL ESIDENTIA 2 SOoRY � z sroar -J WEST 66TH STREET AUTO REPAIR SHOP 1 STORY �o 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina UReaNWORKS 901 NORM THIRD STREET' SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 65101 812.466.3100 CONSULTANT REVISIONS DATE 06.192014 PROJECT I 140016 PHASE SM RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY 143 CFIECK:D BY ON AREA SITE PLAN � LA000 AREA SrrE PLAN 11000 1' _ w_v aa474 O Al] 6Y lY6NY/Ylot 4nNl0n u[ COMMERCIAL 2 STORY Q c Lu C N O COMMERCIAL sroRY OMMERCI L 1 sroRY COMMERCIAL 4 STORY COMMERCIA 1 STORY SOUTHDALE CENTER MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STORY MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STORY I_ MULTIFAMILY HOUSING ^ 2 STORY W Q Uo 9 COMMERCIAL U 6 STORY F o w � I COMMERCIAL I 3 STORY COMMERCIAL ESIDENTIA 2 SOoRY � z sroar -J WEST 66TH STREET AUTO REPAIR SHOP 1 STORY �o 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina UReaNWORKS 901 NORM THIRD STREET' SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 65101 812.466.3100 CONSULTANT REVISIONS DATE 06.192014 PROJECT I 140016 PHASE SM RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY 143 CFIECK:D BY ON AREA SITE PLAN � LA000 AREA SrrE PLAN 11000 1' _ w_v aa474 O Al] 6Y lY6NY/Ylot 4nNl0n u[ LU LU cr U) H CID (n II.I BARRIE ROAD BARRIE ROAD E)asnNG U71LRY EDOSRNG TRANSFORMER W LU cc H H LU W G COMMERCIAL 2 STORY 3119 WESTS9M SnEET MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STORY 8525 BARRIE ROAD 66 West Apartments 3330 6871 St. West, Edina URBANWORKS 901 NORM THIRD SKEET, SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 9124655100 )NSULTANT REVISIONS • Do. De -ptbn DATE 0&192014 PR0.JECT • 14-001& PHASE SITE RAN REVIEW V- !® CHECKED BY ON • -- EMSTING I AND NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK - \ - — — _ _ — _ _� 24,6 FREE STANDING SIGN - - --n • DASHED ONES REPRESENT PROOF H - T „' IIUJJI OF PARKING (37 EY19TMG - - BUS STOP - - AREA WELL - - BICYCLE PARKING ISBIKES STALLS TOTAL MAIN ENTRY § CANOPY TREWS'`— •. GW1. C 1I E%ISTING 2 STORY 1�I ri BUILDING ��c 19 PARKING L�`'il =l;! • EXISTING _ y HOOF Ar ACCESS h OVERRUN r-------, NEW 2 STORY — BICYCLE PARKING ..Lind.( r,r, r, BUILDING 10BIKES - iLJLJ L L J EP \ t5 I yl m s` MECTiANIf?L ROOF PAVERS I 19'fi TYP \ _ _ _ _ _ UNIT _J L___!. I SCRFENMG MECWVSCALIMRSCRED” I I EXISTING MECH UNITS ENCLOSED TRASH WITH _ E)JSTING EGRESS TO REMAIN ROOF - - EXISTING POUTED IN RACE 436 CONCRETE RETAKING WALL _ / )4 T / 95-0 / G IN PLACE Q 3W P CONCRETE RETAINING WALL W LU cc H H LU W G COMMERCIAL 2 STORY 3119 WESTS9M SnEET MEDICAL OFFICE 1 STORY 8525 BARRIE ROAD 66 West Apartments 3330 6871 St. West, Edina URBANWORKS 901 NORM THIRD SKEET, SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 9124655100 )NSULTANT REVISIONS • Do. De -ptbn DATE 0&192014 PR0.JECT • 14-001& PHASE SITE RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY !® CHECKED BY ON ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN LA100 e s Ilr u ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN LA700 I 1' - 206 �Tro• o m3T 4 um.Irel• Aimmn uc SRE PLAN 1A400 Ir -1•u 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBAN !K`^ 901 NORM TFiO ST:EEf, SIRE 145 MINNEAPOUS, MN 56101 612 Kb.3100 OONeULTAM REVISION$ DO. 09- OIp1I90 DATE D6.19.h115 PROJECT• 1f0015 PFVM SITE PINY 9EVIEW DMWN 9T AG OHEOIEO BY ON COLORED SITE PLAN L -300 IF THE ING—E CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCIEVES ANY DEDIDENCIES W THE PLANT SDECTIa6. SOL CONOTTIONS OR ANY OTHER WE SIZE CONORgN 1AHCH MIGHT NECATMLY ARE[T PUNT ESTABLISHMENT. SURI OR GU TEE. HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES 10 THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHDECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT ANO /oR INEGLU1aN 2N BALL Ell M I �a1 PLANTING DETAILS Esp NRS EE ON BxNUB AT aI - — Ow�iRE1 GGRRAFE BAROTf. DRHUH HIED) —E s.®oED IMRD«DDO 1 IIIER: 15EvINIP`AREU HOOF EDGES AT IOV OF BeU B.- BE CLI, W O/) a BURNT. ODEaW1ABlE MARRA BF NTALLY RMOVLO. ED /DAAIFOE —11 IRem I eGNADI DR SDI RD TO BSA lu GRIN. RBI YC PRIPN 10 PUNTING Lfx.: DOUflF SMEOaO UNDAOIII LL AWAY IRLW FRUNV TAR FAUCET — TOPSOIL 6 M'.N FES Al TER OF SAIL SHALL BE CUT. MOIL TW I/J a BJRJ?. ML x I BI TD BETN.OABIF NALLRN TULr IILMOLEO 'q ORRAEL Sl uv1URC, Dlslur�.D sewr2R ON 86.5 SECTION AT WEST WINDOW WELL SECTION AT SOUTH PATIO TO CITY SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE SECTIONS LtoD 1' - 10-0 LANDSCAPE PLAN r - 204r 66 West Apartments 3330 6881 Si. Wes[, Edina URBANWORKS 901 NORTH THIRD SRiffT, SURE M MINNERPOUS, MN 65401 012.456.3100 CONSULTANT ®l Green .ANION CALL A9C11 TE�CT iIYk REVRagNB • DOW DoCdpbm DATE 06.162011 PROJECT • 11OD16 PHASE STILE RAN RIEVM DRI BY SO OHI BY BID PLANTING/SITE PLAN L300 Oo1+Lm4o mUl0 uM.laRlla Aa+lem.a Lac -. a001g1S u MNaaN FPL[S BTA%E (OARR 5 v TED) PUMNTINGB PRIOR i0 —TING FOR REVIEW BY IANOSUFE CHUECI T AREAS DISTURBED Br CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SOD OR HOC MVLCH AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS W/ COMMERCML WEED BARRIER FREES oN GRASS TO ECEM A MULCH O DRIPLINE MULCH Aw WOOD M H IO YBE RDOUBLE SHREDDED I HARDWOODS NATURAL COLOR PLANT SCHEDULE SUPERCEEDS PLAN FOR ALL PLANT ODUTRINES LL TREES HEAR GROUND AREAS OR SIDE11— i0 HAVE CROWN LIMBED UP r0 B' -o" AE10VE cgouxD AN APPROVgIATELr SHAPED cRw:N SEE SPECIDCATIOry FOR PLANTING AND TOP SOIL REQUIREMENTS DRAMNALE AND PEPCOUTIOIN TEST TO BE DONE PRIOR TO PLANTING PERFORM TEST ASP AFTER BUILDING IS BMHRLLED AND GRADE IS ESTABLISIED CONTRACTOR TO PRONDE SPLASH BLOCKS AT EACH HOSEBIB AND AT EACH DAYLIT DOWNSPOUT THAT OT OPEN ON TO FAKED SURFACE, DISPERSE WATER TO TO MI OTHE EROSION PRIOR 10 PVJNTING. OWNER AND CONTRACTOR TO DEFINE IN WRITING TRANSFER DI OF EACH PLANTING TO MMNT N CONSISTANT CARE OF PLNTINGS 4ND SODNDURNTG PLANT ESTABUSHMEM.N 1TWP IS1KLL/.I� RY SIV. AAO TREE LUAC TW.TA Idl[WIF fgrt 9ln 2G' ® SB 2 NATHAN BODAGE SEAT — UAP idix MALANCNEl I GPANEFL ANTUMN SIT E IYITFIAA ONMlt0d.6f 2 S" W pLA19A IA5 VAN, wWl5 lMP LW B X.I,UOS A MRGNIEN SHRUBS ONYd MHT� [IIORMJS (9wA[IIIS Bx PAARf BUSH OON[YANxIE 5 ON l®MU IMImV, R SPOgA 2 OA FDLD 1OL' Aa 5 CM IK A,, 'RUWSA COL, A RRIG TION SYSTEM i0 BE Iry STALLED 01 ALL SIDES of BLDG RIPAIRRIGATION i0 B USED ON SHNUB BEDS, SPRAT HIADS 10 BE USED ON -A N ARFAS. RNNE SENSORS AND WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ARE TO BEWUSED THROUGHOUT SYSTEM q EPAU 2 CNI 1EPREA ,� Ma I— 1' ® "RUS CHININBS 1.1- ;1� R MULCH IN MAINTENANCE STRIP TO BE I I /2" RNER POCK O J" N',N DEPTH OKR COMMERCIK WEED CONTROL FABRIC. COMMERCIAL — EDGER TYPNMNMIS FOLLOW P—THO GETALS FOR ALL PLANTINGS ONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTIONLB CONTRACTOR TO ERECT SNOW FENCE AT DRIP LINE NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS IN BOULEVARD DURING CONSTRUCTION 'GREEN GARRET MF IT an TLUESTEM I C1n y�gNMM —, �— IF THE ING—E CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCIEVES ANY DEDIDENCIES W THE PLANT SDECTIa6. SOL CONOTTIONS OR ANY OTHER WE SIZE CONORgN 1AHCH MIGHT NECATMLY ARE[T PUNT ESTABLISHMENT. SURI OR GU TEE. HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES 10 THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHDECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT ANO /oR INEGLU1aN 2N BALL Ell M I �a1 PLANTING DETAILS Esp NRS EE ON BxNUB AT aI - — Ow�iRE1 GGRRAFE BAROTf. DRHUH HIED) —E s.®oED IMRD«DDO 1 IIIER: 15EvINIP`AREU HOOF EDGES AT IOV OF BeU B.- BE CLI, W O/) a BURNT. ODEaW1ABlE MARRA BF NTALLY RMOVLO. ED /DAAIFOE —11 IRem I eGNADI DR SDI RD TO BSA lu GRIN. RBI YC PRIPN 10 PUNTING Lfx.: DOUflF SMEOaO UNDAOIII LL AWAY IRLW FRUNV TAR FAUCET — TOPSOIL 6 M'.N FES Al TER OF SAIL SHALL BE CUT. MOIL TW I/J a BJRJ?. ML x I BI TD BETN.OABIF NALLRN TULr IILMOLEO 'q ORRAEL Sl uv1URC, Dlslur�.D sewr2R ON 86.5 SECTION AT WEST WINDOW WELL SECTION AT SOUTH PATIO TO CITY SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE SECTIONS LtoD 1' - 10-0 LANDSCAPE PLAN r - 204r 66 West Apartments 3330 6881 Si. Wes[, Edina URBANWORKS 901 NORTH THIRD SRiffT, SURE M MINNERPOUS, MN 65401 012.456.3100 CONSULTANT ®l Green .ANION CALL A9C11 TE�CT iIYk REVRagNB • DOW DoCdpbm DATE 06.162011 PROJECT • 11OD16 PHASE STILE RAN RIEVM DRI BY SO OHI BY BID PLANTING/SITE PLAN L300 Oo1+Lm4o mUl0 uM.laRlla Aa+lem.a Lac -. RAIN CARDEN .P PLANTING SCHEDULE: ao�eTrsTeaw� wX �Tn� ao m � m �i�1Z1�aMmom � oom �i�i� dIWWI ice w rmmmz �i ®ice RAIN GARDEN PLANTING DETAIL T• - Ta-a cnn O 2 REMOVALS/PRESERVATION PLAN 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. Wes[, Edina .—. URBANWORKS 001 NORTH THIRD STREET. SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 012.466.9100 CONSULTANT 1 Green I.A NI,lCAI "- A.t:ll1'Tal' UPA REVISIONS Dam DaeapOm DATE OSISZON PROJECT • 140016 PHASE SITE PLAN OEVSW DRAWN BY SD CHECKED BY Tb PLANT REMOVAL/ PRESERVATION PLAN L301 mpp.Omu p uAaawoawa4.mn uc ,3 STUDIO STUDIO I STUDIO MAIM I SF CU TY DONATION CLOSET _ Mw CI IRCLULATION PERS. II ATTIC BELONG, STOCK CLOSET e,e I'lo F I1,0Y WORKOUT ROOMS MECHANICAL "" WATER SERVICE GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALL S. DIMENSIONS AT LINT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERUNE OF WALLS 4, EXTEND ALL SHAM TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHNG OR TOP OF ROOF PENEMTONS WHERE APPLICABLE 6. ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS ARE TYPE V3, VSA, AND VII IHR FIRE RATING. WRH ACOUSTIC RATING B. ALL RESIDENTIAL CORIIDOR WALLS ARE TYPE Wa 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED T. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8. MAI LAIN B -Y MIN. AND BB MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AE/ S INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROODE 7-2 MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT B DIMENSIONS @ CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMU -- ----- --- ------ ---- --- --- -- -- - -- I I I I I I I ELEV EQUIP —R Iws L �I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina _,AL6._- URBANWORKS 901 NORM THIRD STREET, SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 912465.310D CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY NOTIFOR • • REVISIONS • Doe DexMIllo0 GATE 06192014 PROJECT • 14-0016 PHASE STE PLAN REVIEW DRAWN BY AG CFE I3Y OR SUBLEVEL PLAN A001 AOO1.1 - SUBLEVEL 1 PLAN l AD01 ,AY - rvv I mPNI•e o TRELLSABOVE 0 0 0 GRILLING AREA \ OFFICE !alms O O OFFICE GENERAL NOTES: 1 DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENIEFILJNE OF WALL S. DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLWE OF WALLS 4 D(TEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 5 ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS ARE TYPE VS, VSA AND Val 1 HR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6 ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ARE TYPE Wa 1 HR FIRE RATING, W17H ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7, ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED B. MAINTAIN B -P MPH. AND BS MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS. ALL OTHER PARONG AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7 -7 MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT — — — I DIMENSIONS 0 CMU ARE TO FACE OF CIVIL FREE STANDING SIGN -. AREA WELL BICYCLE PARTING - \ - - LINE OF 16 BIKES ...._..... ........... .._.._... .._......_ ..._....... .. :....J r CANOPYABOVE MAIN ENTRY UP - -) 0 U� COMMUNITY I PROP. ROOM MGMT - IAI lms l3l I Ilos o °q DN- - - -- -- STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO S Itelmlc Helms n�lms nllms llzlms - ->' OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE tNltlas till alas e.Tlens CIRCULATION CIRCULATION Ions PU8JCAFff L�UU (SCULPTURE) { Y✓l COMP. LAB STAIR G Ilalas i l Inl L---JL7-j STU Ble PROJECT• STUDIO Calms STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO MID STUDIO tmlmeF t¢Ims Imlmri lmlms � ®Ims Halms Wilmer DRAVVN BY '- BICYCLE PARKING 10 BIDS 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina URBAN WORKS 9)1 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145 MINNE POUS, LAN 55401 612.455.5700 3ULTANT REVISIONS DALE Dew". DATE 66.197914 PROJECT• 140016 8018E SITE RAN REVIEW DRAVVN BY AS CHECKED BY DH LEVEL 1 PLAN r Al 01 1 PLAN AIM Iff 1--T leeeHApe O LL9 bN uneAV b Ma1sM u[ TRELLIS - BELOW 1 LEVEL 2 PLAN 7T —V-17 GENERAL NOTES: 1 DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 2, DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERUNE OF WALL 3. DIMENS IONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CEN"ERUNE OF WALLS 1 EMEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 5. ALL RESIDENTIAL DEMISING WALLS ARE TYPE V3, V3A AND Ve iHR FIRE RATING, WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6. ALL RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ARE TYPE Wa 1 HR FIRE RATING, 4WTH ACOUSTIC RATING - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 7. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED e. MAINTAIN 6' -2- MN. AND 64' MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARIUNG AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARI9NG AREAS SHALL PROVIDE T' -2' MIN CLEAR HEIGHT B DIMENSIONS @ CMU ARE TO FACE OF CMU 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina URBANWORKS 901 NORM THIRD STREET. SUITE 145 MINNEAPOIS, MN 55101 912.165.3190 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS DATE 06.192011 PROJECT 0 14-0016 PHASE SITE PLAN REVIEW DRAWN BY AG CHECKED BY DH LEVEL 2 PLAN A102 TYPE A UNIT A161 , . Ta i l 12-9' :_ ....... . . ... . .BEDROOM 6 USING ROOM . BATHROOM TYPICAL UNIT A151 1H' - 1'4T GENERAL NOTES: 1. REFER TO MoD FOR TYPICAL 'ACCESSIBLE' CODES AND CLEARANCES REQUIRED 2. INSTALL GRAB BAR BLOCKING AT ALL UNITS (REFER 70 SHEET FOW FOR DETAILS) 3 WITHIN UNITS, ALL WALLS ARE -AS' YJLNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1. HVAC RETURN LOCATED IN WALL REFER TO MECHANICAL FOR DEAALI 5. NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS 6 PROVIDE FLOORING MID BASE AT REFRIGERATOR AND RANGE LOCATIONS 7. GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT AT S O UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE B PROVIDE NON - COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS IN RETURN PLENUMS WALLS AND SOFFTn 9 REFER TO RDW FOR ALL MOUNYNG HEIGHTS (LIGHT SWITCHES, OUTLETS, THERMOSTATS, ENMROMENTAL CONTROLS, KEYNOTED ITEMS. ETC); NOTE REQUIRED VARIATIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE AND TYPE W UNITS 10 NOTE THAT SM. ELEVATIONS MAY BE REVERSED (MIRRORED) FROM ENLARGED UNIT ELEVATIONS SHOWN: REFER TO ACTUAL UNIT PANS FOR LOCATIONS. 11. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION IN WALLS AT BATHROOM, LAUNDRY, BEDROOMS AND IN ANY FURRING WALL THAT IS AD ACENT TO A DUCT RISER OR MECHANICAL UNIT. 12. DIMENSIONS AT PARTY WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE, DIMENSIONS WITHIN UNITS ARE TO FACE OF WALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TYPE III UNIT NOTES: 1. PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR GRAB BARS IN ALL TYPE'A UNITS 2, PROVIDE AND INSTALL SHOWER OR TUBSHOWER SEATS IN ALL TYPE 'A UNITS. 3. PROVIDE TOILET TANK FLUSH CONTROL ON SIDE AWAY FROM WALL, TYP, 4, AT ROLL -UNDER SINKS WITH FRONT APPROACH, INSULATE PIPES: OPTION TO RELOCATE SINK TRAP IN AREA BEYOND REQUIRED KNEE CLEARANCES 5- PROVIDE FLOORING MID BASE AT ROLL41NDER SINKS 9- PROVIDE SWITCH FOR KITCHEN DI RUST IN FACE OF CABINET KEYNOTES: 66 West Apartments 3330 66M St. West, Edina _,AL6._- YRBANWORKS 901 NORM THIRD STREET, SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 912.4659100 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS • DMe D.-Wm DATE 06.191014 PROJECT • 14-0016 PHASE SM RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY MB QHECI® BY DH ENLARGED UNIT PLANS A151 moM/AO 211f 4UISNbbiY•Ibmn uc DUSTING ERCK CHIMNEY TO REMAIN; METAL CORNICE CLAD IN NEW MATERIAL is - DUSTING ROOF TO BE REMOVED AND PREPPED FOR NEW ROOF - b E705nNG ELEVATOR / - OVERRUN TO REMAIN; PATCH AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY EXISTING BUILDING - -- NEW BUILDING \ $I --------- I iMEq� IM" IMECq I J I UNIT UNIT UNIT 1 -'T 1 L---------- {-{--- - - - - -� -------------- -� i t - I I -i- I - -1 i f ? H I i� i - f' I =� f - -' -r� �� i itii+ { -i- -f I MECHANICAL UNIT SCREENING �MECr1 _'+ \ _ MEG1 MECH I I I ROOF PAVERS :M" �y UNIT I UNIT j i I UNIT I I UNIT I j L__ __ _________ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _J L---------- -J�'-. MECHANICAL UNIT SCREENING APPRC%IMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING ROOF ACCESS; REPAIR AND REINFORCE STRUCTURE TO RECEIVE NEW ROOF METAL CORNICE ROOF PLAN IN - r0• 9 HIGH PARAPET WALLS ROOF ACCESS FROM NEW STAIR 66 West Apartments 3330 Nth S1. Wes, Edina NRBANWORK8 901 NORM THIRD STREU. SUITE 145 MNNEAPOUS, MN 66101 912.466.9100 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY NOT •• CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS • DM DesaheleA 0117E 06195119 PROJECT • 140016 811119E SITE RAN REVIEW ROOF PLAN A201 aA.v ALUMINUM TRELLIS EXISTING BRICK T23 - WPM AWL Colonial Red PVDF 24W METAL PANEL - HORIZONTAL r> VINYL DOUBLEHUNG WINDOW 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBAN 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUnE 145 MINNEAPOUS. MN 55401 612 466.3100 CONSULTANT REVISIONS s one o.sma�o� DATE 0619.X014 PROJECT s 140016 PHASE 4TE RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY aN CHECKED I3V DH EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS I� , •J �nI/.O IDu p un.rwar Aa..mn u[ T23- WA Terra Cotta PVDF 23 9a T13 -A - tIVaN M Metallic Sliver PVDF 24 ga METAL PANEL - VERTICAL r> VINYL DOUBLEHUNG WINDOW 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBAN 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUnE 145 MINNEAPOUS. MN 55401 612 466.3100 CONSULTANT REVISIONS s one o.sma�o� DATE 0619.X014 PROJECT s 140016 PHASE 4TE RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY aN CHECKED I3V DH EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS I� , •J �nI/.O IDu p un.rwar Aa..mn u[ T23- WA Terra Cotta PVDF 23 9a T23 - W.N IN Copper Penny PVOF 24 ga r> VINYL DOUBLEHUNG WINDOW 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBAN 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUnE 145 MINNEAPOUS. MN 55401 612 466.3100 CONSULTANT REVISIONS s one o.sma�o� DATE 0619.X014 PROJECT s 140016 PHASE 4TE RAN REVIEW DRAWN BY aN CHECKED I3V DH EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS I� , •J �nI/.O IDu p un.rwar Aa..mn u[ HORIZONTAL. META_ PANEL VERTICAL METAL PANEL METAL CORNICE AI 1MNDOWS FACE BFKX W WEST ELEVATION A3D1 17 = 1 O' VERTICAL META. PANEL:.. . METAL CORNICE EJDSTMIG BUN DING TFELLIS DIMENSIONAL BULLING SIGNAGE TOTAL AREA TO BE LESS THAN M SO FT © SOUTH ELEVATION A301 +z -+a INTI '(tN 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBAN 901 NORTH THRD STREET, SUITE 115 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55101 612 455.3100 CONSULTANT RENBIONS _ _ ♦ DNA OMMUIpIIeLi DIMENSIONAL BUlDINO SIGNAGE TOTAL AIEATO BE LESS THAN 50 SO Fl .- EXSTINGBUM.DING VERTICAL METAL PANEL _j. -i_� DATE D6.19 2011 PRC.ECT I 110016 PHASE SITE RAN REVIEW DRAWN 9Y llN CHECKED BY DN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A301 a C m13 a-- I I 'ANY] . WINDOWS ENTRY CANOPY - METAL CORNICE VERTICAL METAL PANEL FACE BRIO( EXISTING BUILDING HORIZONTAL MEIN PANEI METAL CORNICE M NORTH ELEVATION A302 17 - T 0' VERTICAL . METAL PANEL EXISTING BUILDING VERTICAL META. PANEL. HORIZONTAL. METAL PANEL FACE BRICK METAL CORNICE VINYL. WINDOWS n EAST ELEVATION A302 17 - 1 V — — 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St West, Edina URBAN..ax;1c._. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 115 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612/663100 CONSULTANT DATE 06191011 PRO.E=• 140016 PHASE SITE PLAN REVIEW ORAVM T' M Ol- O NY 011 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A302 �aN+M� L n�: t q �nnnwu yvwvurt I C BUILDING PERSPECTIVE FROM NORTH 66 West Apartments 3330 66th St. West, Edina URBAN - aasFan t 901 NORTH THM STREET, SURE 115 MiNhEAPOUS, MN 55101 612156.7100 CONMJLTAW PENBIONB # OIU OuoloOm -- — DATE 06.19.2011 PROJECT / J+-0016 PFIAE RTE NT PI REVIEW ORAIMN BY M CTIEOIED BY di BUILDING PERSPECTIVE A351 b.3 - .I- -- b- 1--3.i —b.-l— �.i 6b wesL Apartments MWMEAKM MN 554M pEy Mo Ode Once DATE 06.12=4 PRQrf 0 i UW100140 PHASE POR 0RAWN By SOW CHECKED 9Y UMC REPORT RECOMMENDATION ,o 0 • .1 CORPOP-xv SID • lase To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item Vill'. A. From: Debra Mangen Action 0 City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information El. Subject: Resolution No. 2014-87 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014-87 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 f RESOLUTION NO. 2014-87 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Park Department: Edina Community Foundation $300.00 Barnyard Boogie. Expenses Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Prevention Fund Dated: September 2, 2014 Attest: $613.00 Night to Unite Expenses Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City'Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said.Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 2, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 -o • POVIN, 1888 • : Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Mr. James Hovland, Mayor Ms. Joni Bennett, City Council Member Ms. Mary Brindle, City Council Member Mr. John Sprague, City Council Member Ms. Ann Swenson, City Council Member Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50`h St. Edina, MN 55424 August 19, 2014 Re: Letter opposing rezoning the Regional Medical area Dear Council Members, After attending the City Planning meeting on August 13, 2014,1 left with many unanswered questions. Primarily, how does providing "supportive" service i.e.: money management, employment coaching and help with job internships remotely fit in with medical services? It appears this project is being pushed through without thorough planning and true fiduciary responsibility. Dozens of public meetings have been held in major cities to create affordable housing. Who has researched best practices used around the country that provide clear, measureable outcomes to curb homelessness? While the apartments would apply toward 39 affordable housing units in the city, have you considered the revenue in property taxes lost in a premier Regional Medical area? While Beacon has worked on this project for years, has the city engaged citizens (Tom Nelson, a real estate agent has offered his assistance) to find a neighborhood for this project? More space availability at a much lesser cost would be beneficial. Sustainability of 66`h West is over 80% dependent on government funding while less than 20% is private donations. I listened.to how important the neighbors are to homeless young people. I agree. The 66`h West proposal does not offer neighborhood support. From 8PM to 8AM there will be a front desk worker opening the door. There are no citizens nearby to help, guide and, hold them accountable for unacceptable behaviors on the grounds and surrounding areas. Teenagers make poor decisions. Homeless young adults according to Beacon are victims. Keep in mind, many victims become perpetrators. Mental illness, addiction and physical /sexual abuse issues will arise. While there is a no drug /alcohol policy included in the lease, who is ultimately responsible for Infractions? Look at dorm rooms and the risky behaviors that occur. At least there are Resident Assistants and a Head Resident living with the young people. It takes a neighborhood community to support and sometimes provide tough love to nurture productive members of our society. Look at the police reports and you do the math regarding monthly calls to 3710 Nicollet Ave. Interview all their neighbors to ascertain their concerns. Look at the facts, not the emotional aspect. Respectfully, Terri Merz 6525 Barrie Rd Edina, MN 55435 Heather Branigin From: Todd Olson <todd @metrocitiesmn.org> Sent: Monday, August 11,.2014 2:30 PM To: Todd Olson Cc: Laurie Jennings; Patricia Nauman; Charlie Vander Aarde Subject: 2014 Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Members Attachments: meeting 2 packet (final draft).pdf To: Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Members From: Todd Olson Attached are the materials, for our second Transportation and General Government Policy Committee meeting, next Monday, August 18th, from 11:00 —1:30 at the LMC Building located at 145 University Ave W in St. Paul 55103. We will be hearing from Ali Elhassan, The Water Supply Planning Manager at the Metropolitan Council on water supply issues in the metropolitan area from 11:00- 12:00. Parking is available in the lot located on the west side of the building. Make sure you sign in with the LMC front desk when you arrive. Please take the time to read through the policies before the meeting. Please come with your ideas and suggestions. We will provide Subway again or feel free to bring your own lunch. The remaining committee schedule is as follows: Monday, August 18 11:00 -1:30 Monday, September 8 11:00 -1:30 August 11, 2014 TO: Transportation & General Government Policy Committee Members FROM: Scott Lund, Committee Chair and Mayor of Fridley SUBJECT: Meeting Notice: and Agenda - Monday, August 18,2014 11:00 a.m. —1:30 p.m. Attached are the materials for the second Transportation and General Government Policy Committee meeting, next Monday, August 18th, from 11:00 am -1:30 pm, at the LMC Building located at 145 University Ave W in Su Paul 55103. Parking is available yin the lot located on the west side of.the building. Make sure you sign in with the LMC front desk when you arrive. Please take the time to read through the policies before the meeting and come with your ideas and suggestions. We will provide Subway lunches for committee members again. Monday, August 18, 2014 Transportation and General Government Policy Committee AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. Adopt minutes. 3. SPEAKER:Ali Elhassan, Metropolitan Council Environment Services, regarding overview of MCES' work on water supply 4. Discussion of potential policy modifications and new policies. 5. Other business. 6. Adjourn. (1:30 p.m.) Transportation and General Government Committee Monday, July 14, 2014 Minutes The meeting was called to order by Chair Lund at 11:05 a.m. Present: Steve Albrecht, Susan Amtz, Michelle Beaulieu, Joni Bennet, Brooke Bordson, Bob Cardinal, Scott Cordes, Steve Elkins, Anne Finn, Mary Gaasch, Gary Hansen, Katie Knutson, Denny Laufenburger, Lorrie Louder, Scott Lund (Chair), Mark Maloney, Loren Olson, Gene Ranieri, Michael Ridley, Dan Ryan, Sue Sanger, Steve Schmidt, Dick Swanson, Kevin Watson, Ady Wickstrom, Susan Young Chair Lund welcomed committee members and asked everyone to introduce themselves. Ms. Nauman went over the policy development process with the committee. Mr. Olson provided a legislative recap, noting the shorter duration of the session, various pieces of legislation around street improvement districts, groundwater, and fire sprinklers. Mr. Maloney asked whether we were back to "ground zero' with respect to street improvement districts. Mr. Olson said that we are essentially having to start the process fresh in 2015. Mr. Olson provided an update of Metro Cities' General Government policies and applicable legislative activity. Ms. Arntz noted additional legislation with respect to policy 2 -0 passed this year, stating that the new law requiring cities to post financial filings on their web sites. Ms. Sanger asked about anew issue related to Comcast and the new merger, and the complication with the transfer of cable franchise to companies around specific timelines, when the companies don't yet exist. She suggested we may need legislative assistance with this issue. Mr. Ryan asked about extending the Clean Air Act to e- cigarettes. Ms. Knutson asked about a policy around supporting funding for emerald ash borer. Mr. Olson stated that staff has been discussing the need for a more comprehensive water policy for Metro Cities. Discussion followed. Mr. Olson provided a brief review of Metro Cities' Transportation related policies. Discussion followed regarding the underfunding of transportation. Mr. Elkins noted that MNDOT underfunds arterials and that they have admitted these are underfunded. The committee discussed around local tools like street improvement districts. Ms. Louder asked about the TED fund versus the Corridors of Commerce; Mr. Olson explained the key differences between the two. Ms. Sanger noted that several. committee members are on the TAB and that last year, TAB members were asked to approve a selection of Corridors of Commerce routes for certain projects but had no input into the decision making beforehand. A second issue she raised was around the fact that electric cars pay less in gas taxes and the issue of finding equitable ways to pay for transportation funding needs to be paid from these vehicles.A third issue she'raised for committee consideration was to suggest that Metro Cities should rescind its support or be silent around supporting the ability to discuss the Dan Patch line; there are many issues already with freight and rail. Mr. Olson clarified Metro Cities' position in that our support is to lift the gag, but.does not go further around support for a line. Ms. Wickstrom noted the broader issues around rail traffic and safety.. If we have a policy, we should discuss the issue more broadly. Further discussion followed. Ms. Young noted that metro area cities need to band together around these issues; there are many underground issues, safety issues, issues that transcend city boundaries, etc., to address. Ms. Hamann Roland suggested we should seek the new technologies for monitoring, etc. Mr. Swanson stated that the state needs to take responsibility for their facilities when streets are being re- constructed. He stated that the state generates traffic but does not take enough responsibility and cities therefore end up bearing the costs. Ms. Young said as the metro area grows, there are issues with borders, and the use of transit. She noted that it is difficult for Forest Lake residents to get buses that go across county lines and vice versa, and that businesses serve both areas and residents that live within and outside of. metro lines. These are "edge" transit issues that require cooperation and discussion. Ms. Young noted the issue of speed limits in her community and the fact that gravel roads still have 55 MPH limits. She would like to see local control around speed limits. Ms. Knutson asked-about transportation and street improvement districts and noted the city is facing shortfalls, and that cities need a new infusion of resources. Mr. Olson discussed the potential need for a more comprehensive water policy for the organization. He said the issue of water is at the forefront of regional and state discussions, and that Metro Cities needs to consider how it should weigh in with respect to these issues that are surfacing at the Capitol and Met Council, as well as at the DNR and other agencies. Discussion followed. Mr. Maloney noted that this is a big issue with many different agencies, task'forces, etc., and that we want to make sure that agencies are not contradicting each other and that there is a clarification of roles. Mr. Watson noted the need for a clarification of the issues, and the importance of maintaining local control. Ms. Bennett noted that many of these issues transcend. city boundaries; aquifers are not based on city boundaries for example. We need a regional approach. Ms. Arntz noted the importance of clarity; how do we make the decisions that need to be made? How deep should our policies go? Mr. Albrecht noted that one size does not fit all and that this must be reflected in our policies. We should not be too specific but should help to take leadership on these issues as we are key stakeholders. Mr. Maloney asked about the Met Council's role; discussion followed. Staff will bring further information to the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 12:50 p.m. r 4 Agenda Item 4 August 11, 2014 TO: Transportation and General Government Policy Committee FROM: Todd Olson, Metro Cities Staff RE: Items for Discussion at August Meeting At our first meeting, the policy committee discussed at length a number of potential edits for the committee to consider on several policies, and some potential new policies, for which staff has drafted language for your review and consideration. The committee did not adopt any policies at the first meeting. Staff recommends adoption of the following General Government policies without changes: 2 -A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority 2 -B City Enterprise Activities 2 -C Firearms on City Property 2 -D 911 Telephone Tax 2 -E 800 MHz Radio System 2 -17 Building Codes 2 -H Residential Care Facilities 24 Housing Ordinance Enforcement 2 -K Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact 2 -L Dangerous Substance Regulation 2 -M Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority 2 -N Organized Waste Collection 2 -0 Election Administration Costs 2 -P Utility Franchise Fees, Accountability and Cost Transparency The following policies include new policies or amendments for consideration by the committee: 2 -G Administrative Fines — amendment drafted eliminate outdated references 2 -I Annexation — amendment drafted to eliminate outdated references 2 -Q Water Supply (New policy) - Staff drafted a new policy to reflect the discussion by the committee at the July meeting. The new policy speaks to support for the removal of barriers to wastewater re -use, improved inter - agency coordination, clarifying the roles of local, regional and state governments with respect to water, streamlining and consolidating permit approval processes and the availability of statewide resources to plan for and ensure the future sustainability of water supply in the metropolitan area. Staff recommends adoption of the following Transportation policies without changes: 5 -E Highway Turnbacks & Funding 5 -G Photo Enforcement of Traffic Laws 5 -H Airport Noise Mitigation 5 -I Cities Under 5,000 Population 54 County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula 5 -K Municipal Input /Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads 5 -L Plat Authority 5 -0 Transit Taxing District 5 -P Complete Streets The following policies include amendments for consideration by the committee: 5 -A Transportation Funding — amendment drafted to clean up language and to further emphasize the importance of the role of the municipal system in transportation needs 5 -B Regional Transit System — amendment'drafted to eliminate outdated references and to express support for the Met Council to address transit issues for cities on the border of the metropolitan area 5 -C Transit Financing — amendment drafted to more clearly express support for the expansion of regular route service 5 -0 Street Improvement Districts —amendment drafted to more plearly state that. all properties should pay to maintain and improve streets 5 -F "3C" Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials' Role — amendment drafted to eliminate outdated references and express the importance of local official participation in planning and prioritization decisions 5 -M City Speed Limit Control — amendment drafted to support allowing cities to decrease speed limits on roads with changing characteristics that are not yet sufficient to justify a reduction through a speed study 5 -N MnDOT Maintenance Budget — amendment drafted to include right -of -way and sound walls as infrastructure that needs to be maintained by MNDoT We have also invited speakers from the Met Council on water supply and transportation planning over the next two meetings, and the committee can use this information to help develop its recommendations for the 2015 Transportation and General Government legislative policies. 6 1 General Government (2014) 2 3 2 -A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority 4 5 Metro Cities opposes statutory changes that erode local control and authority or create 6 additional mandated tasks requiring new or added local costs without a corresponding 7 state appropriation or funding mechanism. Metro Cities believes that zoning decisions 8 should be made at the local level. Metro Cities supports legislation that gives local officials 9 greater authority and discretion to approve variances in order to remain flexible in 10 response to the unique land use needs of their own community. 11 12 New unfimded mandates potentially cause increased property taxes which impede cities' ability 13 to fund traditional service needs. To allow for greater collaboration and flexibility in providing 14 local services, Metro Cities also encourages the removal of barriers or hurdles to cooperation and 15 coordination between cities and other units of government or entities. Metro Cities supports 16 local decision - making authority. 17 18 2 -B City Enterprise Activities 19 20 Creation of an enterprise operation allows a city to provide the desired service while maintaining 21 financial and management control. The state should refrain from infringing on this ability to 22 provide and control services for the benefit of community residents. 23 24 Metro Cities supports cities having authority to establish city enterprise operations in 25 response to community needs, local preferences, state mandates or to ensure residents' 26 quality of life. 27 28 2 -C Firearms on City Property 29 30 Cities should be allowed to prohibit handguns and other weapons in city -owned buildings, 31 facilities and parks. This would allow locally elected officials to determine whether to allow 32 permit - holders to bring guns into municipal buildings, liquor stores, city council chambers and 33 city sponsored youth activities. It is not Metro Cities' intention for cities to have the authority to 34 prohibit legal weapons in parking lots, on city streets, city sidewalks or on locally approved 35 hunting land. 36 37 Metro Cities supports local control to allow or prohibit handguns and other weapons on 38 city-owned property. 39 40 2 -D 911 Telephone Tax 41 42 Public safety answering points (PSAPs) must be able to continue to rely on state 911 revenues to 43 pay for upgrades and modifications to local 911 systems, maintenance and operational support, 44 and dispatcher training. 45 I Metro Cities supports state funding for the technology and training needed to provide the 2 number and' location of wireless and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) calls to 911 on 3 computer screens and transmit that data to police, fire and first responders. 4 5 1-E 800 M11z Radio System 6 7 Metro Cities urges the Legislature to provide cities with the financial means to obtain required 8 infrastructure and subscriber equipment (portable and mobile radios) as well as provide funding 9 for operating costs, since the prime purpose of this system is to allow public safety agencies and 10 other units of government the ability to communicate effectively. 11 12 Metro Cities supports the work of the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (previously 13 the Metropolitan Radio Board) in implementing and maintaining the 800 MHz radio 14 system, as_g lon as cities are not forced to modify their current systems or become a part of 15 the 800 MHzl2adio'System unless they so choose. 16 17 2 -F Building Codes 18 19 Thousands of new housing units are constructed annually in the metro area. Structural and water 20 intrusion problems have surfaced in many houses and commercial buildings built in the last 20 21 years. These.problems have resulted in dissatisfied homeowners and conflicts among the state, 22 builders and'cities. 23 24 Metro Cities supports an equitable distribution of fees from.the Construction Code Fund, 25 with proportional distribution based on the area of enforcement where the fees were 26 received. Metro Cities farther supports a joint effort by the state; cities and builders to 27 collectively identify appropriate uses for the fund, including education, analysis of new 28 materials and construction techniques, building code updating,,building..inspector training, 29 and development of performance standards and identification of construction "best 30 practices." 31 32 Metro Cities supports including the International Green Construction Code as an `optional 33 appendix' to the State Building Code to allow cities to utilize appropriate parts of those 34 guidelines in their communities. Metro Cities also supports adopting the international 35 energy conservation code to the state building code without amendments. Metro Cities does 36 not support legislative solutions that fail to recognize the interrelationships among builders, 37 state building codes and cities. Metro Cities supports efforts to increase awareness of the 38 potential impacts and benefits of requiring sprinklers in new homes and townhouses, and 39 supports disc'. iscussion and the dissemination of information around these impacts via the 40 code adoption process through the Department of Labor and Industry. 41 42 2 -G Administrative Fines 43 44 Traditional methods of citation, enforcement and prosecution have met with increasing costs to 45 local units of government. The use of administrative fines is a tool to moderate those costs. 46 Metro Cities suppeAed empmsien e support s the administrative fine authori ty, enaeted in 2 , 8 1 rg anted to allow cities to issue administrative fines .for-defined local traffic offenses, but supports 2 further modifications are nesessaf.to enhance the workability of the authority. Metro Cities 3 continues to support all cities' authority to use administrative fines for�regulatory ordinances, 4 such as building codes, zoning codes, health codes, and public safety and nuisance ordinances. 5 6 Metro Cities supports the use of city administrative fines, at a minimum, for regulatory 7 matters that are not duplicative of misdemeanor or higher level state traffic and criminal 8 offenses. Metro Cities also endorses a fair hearing process before a disinterested third 9 party. 10 11 2 -H Residential Care Facilities 12 13 Sufficient funding and oversight is needed to ensure that residents living_ in residential care 14 facilities have appropriate care and supervision, and that neighborhoods are not 15 disproportionately - impacted by high concentrations of residential care facilities. Under current 16 law, operators of certain residential care facilities are not required to notify cities when they 17 intend to purchase single- family housing for this purpose. Cities do not have the authority to 18 regulate the locations of group homes and residential care facilities. Cities have reasonable 19 concerns about high concentrations of these facilities in residential neighborhoods, and 20 additional traffic and service deliveries surrounding these facilities when they are grouped 21 closely together. Municipalities recognize and support the services residential care facilities 22 provide. However, cities also have an interest in preserving balance between group homes and 23 other uses in residential neighborhoods. 24 25 Providers applying to operate-residential care facilities should be required to notify the city when 26 applying for licensure so as to be informed of local ordinance requirements as a part of the 27 application process. 28 29 Licensing agencies should be required to notify the city of properties receiving licensure to be 30 operated as residential care facilities. 31 32 Metro Cities supports statutory modifications to require licensed agencies. and licensed 33 providers that operate residential care facilities to notify the city of properties being 34 operated as residential care facilities. Metro Cities also supports the establishment of non - 35 concentration standards, similar to those allowed for the core cities, for residential care 36 facilities to prevent clustering and require the appropriate county agencies to enforce these 37 rules. 38 39 2 -I Annexation 40 41 A 2006 Munkipal Boundary Adjustmens-T-a-dr. Feree was 6haiged with developing 42 43 beftef eeramunie&e and jointly plan petential aftneitatieftsr .Attempts have,been made in recent 44 years to reduce tensions between cities and townships around annexations. A Municipal 45 Boundary Adjustment Task Force, whose work was published in 2009, worked to develop 46 recommendations regarding best practices annexation training for city and township officials to 9 1 better communicate and iointly plan potential annexations. While the task force was able to 2 define the differences between cities and townships on the issue of annexation, no significant 3 advancements were made in creating best practices. 4. 5 Metro Cities supports,continued legislative efl'orts,,to develop recommendations regarding 6 best practices annexation - training for city and township officials to better communicate 7 and ,jointly plan potential annexations. Further, Metro Cities',supports substantive changes 8 to the state's annexation laws that will lead to better land -use planning, energy 9 conservation, greater environmental protection, fairer tax bases, and;'fewee conflicts 10 between townships, and cities. Metro Cities also supports technical annexation changes that 11 have been agreed to by cities and townships. 12 13 24 Housing Ordinance Enforcement . 14 15 In 2008, the Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled in Morris v. Sax that certain provisions of the 16 city of Morris' rental housing code were invalid because there were subjects dealt with under the 17 state building code and the city was attempting to regulate these areas "differently from.the state 18 building code." Minnesota Statutes section 1613.6s subdivision 1 states: 19 20 "The state building code applies statewide and supersedes the building code of any municipality. 21 A municipality must not by ordinance or through development agreement require building code 22 provisions regulating components or systems of any residential structure that are different from 23 any provision of the state building code." 24 25 Metro Cities supports the ability of cities to enforce all housing codes passed by. a local 26 municipality to maintain its housing stock. 27 28 2 -K Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact 29 30 Many issues including, but not limited to, the implementation of a metropolitan area 31 groundwater monitoring network, emerald ash borer eradication and the cleanup of storm -water 32 retention ponds, come,with significant local costs, and have impacts that reach beyond municipal 33 boundaries. 34 35 Metro Cities supports the availability of statewide; funding sources to address local issues 36 that have regional or statewide significance. Metro'Cities opposes the requirement.of 37 enacting ordinances more restrictive than state law in exchange for access to these funds. 38 39 2 -L Dangerous Substance Regulation 40 41 In metropolitan regions where most cities share - boundary, lines with other cities, local bans of 42 dangerous products and substances do not eliminate access to these products unless all cities take 43 the same regulatory action. 44 45 In circumstances where there is broad local support for a ban and any regulatory issues under 46 consideration are regional or statewide in nature, as evidenced by recent synthetic marijuana and 10 analog drug situations, Metro Cities supports statewide regulation and prohibition of products or substances found to present a danger to anyone who uses them. 4 2-M Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority 5 6 Cities are authorized to enact ordinances that disallow the placeiierit of private wells within city 7 limits to ensure both water safety and availability for residents arid- businesses. Municipal water 8 systems are financially dependent upon users to operate and maintain the system. A loss of 9 significant rate payers as a result of unregulated private well drilling would economically 10 destabilize water systems and could lead to contamination of the water supply. 11 12 Metro Cities supports current law authorizing cities to regulate and prohibit the placement 13 of. private wells within. municipal utility service boundaries and opposes any attempt to 14 remove or alter that authority. 15 16 2 -N Organized Waste Collection 17 18 Cities over 1,000 in population are required by law to ensure all residents have solid waste 19 collection available to them. A city can meet the statutory requirement by licensing haulers to 20 operate in an open collection system, authorize city employees to collect waste, or implement 21 organized collection through'one or multiple haulers to increase efficiency, reduce truck traffic 22 and control costs to residents. 23 24 Metro Cities supports new laws enacted during the 2013 legislative session to streamline 25 statutory requirements to allow cities to work with existing hanlers to achieve the benefits 26 of organized.collection or investigate the merits of organized collection without the . 27 pressure of a rigid timeline and requirement.to•pass `an intent to organize' at.the beginning 28 of the discussion process. Metro Cities opposes any legislation that would further. increase 29 the cost,0- flurther complicate the process cities are required to follow to organize waste 30 collection for prohibit cities from 'implementing or using organized waste collection. 31 32 2 -0 Election Administration Costs 33 34 Cities playa critical role in managing and ensuring the integrity.of elections. Any changes made 35 to election laws to implement a voter ID requirement should not place undue financial or 36 administrative burdens on local governments. Any additional costs brought on by election law 37 changes should be the responsibility of the state. 38 39 Metro Cities also supports the adoption of legislation to establish early voting as an 40 alternative to no excuse absentee voting. Early voting has been proven to be a cost effective 41 and efficient process, in other states by reducing the burdensome administrative mandates 42 as required for absentee ballots. 43 44 2 -P Utility Franchise Fees, Accountability and Cost Transparency 45 46 Minnesota cities are authorized by Minnesota statutes M.S. 216B and 301B.01 to require a 11 1 public utility (gas or electric) that provides services to the city or occupies the public right of 2 way within a city to obtain a franchise. Several metro area cities have entered into such 3 agreements which require that the utility pay a fee to help offset the costs of maintaining the 4 right of way. 5 6 Cities are also adopting energy policies that often result in the use of renewable energy resources 7 to light or heat public facilities. Policies and programs have also been instituted in, cooperation 8 with the public utility franchisee to,increase energy efficiency for all users. Cities also contract at 9 city expense with public utilities to "underground" wires. 10 11 The State of Minnesota has.also adopted legislation that requires energy companies to provide 12 more of its electric energy from renewable sources. The specific amounts vary by type of utility. 13 14 Metro Cities supports: 15 16 State policies adopted by legislation or through rules of. the Pub_ lic Utility Commission that 17 provide cities with the authority to include city energy policies and priorities in a franchise 18 or similar agreement with a franchisee. 19 20 Greater accountability and transparency for city paid costs associated with underground 21 utility and similar work performed by electric utilities as part of a local project. 22 2 -0 WATER SUPPLY 4NEW POLICY) ' 23 Municipal water suppliers are .charged with meeting the water. supply needs of their. communities 24 and attempt to do so with safe.'reliable and cost effective systems that are. sustainable both for 25 established cities and for all future erowth. 26 The lavers of available groundwater in the metropolitan area cross municipal boundaries and 27 therefore requires a coordinated regional approach to planning for its future availability. 28 Currently, approximately 75% of municipal water supply in the metropolitan area comes from 29 groundwater. Metropolitan Council projections predict declines in aquifer availability due to 30 population growth estimates and current use strategies. However, the current water supply in the 31 region is abundant and there is no data sukusting we are in danger of widespread water 32 shortages in the region. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 how much water can be sustainable drawn from the gggifers and what effect increases in re -use, conservation and recharge can have on the sustainability and availability of both groundwater and surface water. Many of these strategies cross agency jurisdictions and will require improved coordination and cooperation. 40 Municipal water suppliers have made significant infrastructure investments in their systems 41 based on calculated water availability and DNk permits. Proposals to reduce the reliance on 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 groundwater by switching municipal water systems from groundwater to surface water supplies will come with significant costs. The outcomes and benefits of re- balancing the mix of groundwater and surface water use for specific municipalities and the region must be identifiable before any projects are undertaken. The sustainability of our water supply is an issue of regional and statewide' significance:and the containment. The metropolitan region must consider the effects of groundwater use beyond the borders of the metropolitan area`on:the region's groundwater availability and the cost of treating contaminants in surface water that comes into the metropolitan area for use. Metro Cities supports the removal of barriers to wastewater re -use, improved inter- agency coordination, clarifying the roles of local, regional and state governments with respect to water, streamlining and consolidating permit approval processes and the availability of statewide resources .to plan for and ensure the future sustainability of water supply in the metropolitan area. 13 I Transportation (2014) 2 3 5-A Transportation Funding 4 5 A comprehensive transportation system is vital in planning for and meeting the physical, social 6 and economic needs-6f our state and metropolitan region. Adequate and ?stable sources of 7 funding.are necessarv:to ensure the development and maintenance of a high quality_ efficient and 8 safe tr ansportation system that can meet these needs, an d will position the state and region to be 9 economically competitive in the years ahead. 10 11 Under the current financing structure, transportation needs in the metropolitan region continue to 12 be severely inadequate and underfunded. Our transportation funding system relies lily 13 primarily _on the gas tax for roads and the motor vehicle sales tax (MUST) for'transit. 14 Automobiles are becoming more fuel, efficient and MVST receipts continue to lag behind 15 projections, resulting in funding levels that continually fail to meet demand. 16 17 Transportation funding and planning must be a high priority for state, regional!and local 18 poligMakers so: that the transportation system can sufficiently meet the needs 'of the state's 19 residents and businesses and its projected population r Funding.and planning for our 20 regional and statewide systems must be coordinated at the federal, state, regional and local levels 21 to optimally achieve long term needs and goals. We must maximize existing -resen-wirsees aafi" 22 1 mere suffleient and equkable trmspeFWien fiamaing is put in plase. _ 23 Feseurses. 24 .25 In addition, cities lack adequate tools and resources for the maintenance and improvement of the 26 ai.Ahe ity te use addifienal teels municipal systems, with resources restricted to property taxes 27 and special assessments. It is imperative that alternative revenue generating authority be granted 28 to municipalities for this purpose to relieve the burden on the property tax system. 29 30 Metro Cities strongly supports stable and sufficient statewide transportation funding and 31 local tools to meet the, long term transportation system needs of the region and local 32 municipal systems. Metro Cities also supports state financial assistance, as well as 33 innovations in design and construction, to offset the impacts of regional transportation 34 construction projects on local communities and businesses. 35 36 5 -B Regional Transit System 37 38 The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area needs a multi -modal regional transit system as part of a 39 comprehensive transportation strategy that serves both commuters and the transit dependent. The 40 transit system should be composed of a mix of HOV lanes, Bus Rapid Transit, express and 41 regular route bus service, exclusive transit ways; light rail transit and commuter rail corridors 42 designed to connect residential,'employment, retail and entertainment centers. The system should 43 be regularly monitored and adjusted-to ensure that routes of service correspond to the region's 44 changing travel patterns. 45 46 Metro Cities StFOBgty SUPPOFted the % eent sales ta* passed by the 2008 Legislature. This 14 1 2 . Metro Cities opposes using the 3 currently dedicated Metropolitan Transportation Area sales tax proceeds to further 4 subsidize funding for Metro Transit and suburban transit providers that are the 5 responsibility of the Legislature and Metropolitan Council. Any increase to the sales tax 6 already dedicated to transit should be used to benefit the transit system as a whole. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Metro Cities is also opposed to legislative or Metropolitan Council directives that constrain the ability of metropolitan transit providers to provide a full range of transit services, including reverse commute routes, suburb - to-suburb routes,Iransit hub feeder services or new, experimental services that may show a low rate of operating cost recovery from the fare box. In the interest of including all potential options in the pursuit of a regionally balanced transit system, Metro Cities supports the repeal of the law passed in 2002 which imposed a gag order on the Dan Patch Commuter Rail Line. Current congestion levels and forecasted population growth require a stable, reliable and growing source of revenue for transit construction and operations so that our metropolitan region can adequately and strategically meet its transportation needs to remain economically competitive. Metro Cities supports an effective, efficient and comprehensive regional transit system as an invaluable component in meeting the multimodal transportation needs of the metropolitan region and to the region's economic vibrancy and quality of life. Metro. Cities supports a regional governance structure that can ensure a measurably reliable 3 and efficient system that recognizes the diverse transit needs of our region and addresses the funding needs for all components of the system. Metro Cities also recognizes boundaries of the region. 33 34 5 -C Transit Financing 35 36 The Twin Cities metropolitan area is served by a regional transit system that is expanding to 37 include rail transit and dedicated busways. Any operating subsidies necessary to support this 38 system should come from a regional or statewide funding source. The property taxpayers of 39 individual cities and.counties should not be required to fund the operation of specific transit lines 40 or routes of service within this regional system. MVST revenue projections have not been 41 reliable and the Legislature has repeatedly reduced general fund support for Metropolitan 42 Transit. As a result the regional transit providers continue to operate at a funding deficit. 43 44 Shifting demographics in the metropolitan region will mean increased demand for transit 45 in areas with and without current transit service. Metro Cities supports stable and growing 46 revenue sources to fund the operating budget for all 'regional transit providers at a level 15 1 sufficient to meet the growing operational and capital transit needs of the region and to 2 expand the system to areas" that currently have little or no transit options. 3 4 _ Metro Cities supports,an:increase in the regional sales tax to fund the expansion of rezular 5 route service, the continuing capital expenses and expanded operational needs of the 6 metropolitan transit system if the increase is accompanied by sufficient local controls over 7 the collection and expenditure of the new revenue and geographic balance is maintained in 8 the expansion of service to allow cities to appropriately plan for growth in population and 9 service "needs along new and expanded transit service. Metro Cities opposes diversions of 10 the, uses of this tax for any other purposes. 11 12 5 -D Street Improvement Districts 13 14 Funding sources for local transportation projects are limited to the use of Municipal State Aid 15 (MSA), property taxes and special assessments, and cities under 5,000 in population are not 16 eligible for MSA. With increasing pressures on city budgets and limited tools and resources, 17 cities are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain aging streets. 18 19 Street improvement districts allow cities in developed and developing areas to fund new 20 construction as well as reconstruction and maintenance efforts. 21 22 The street,improvement district is designed to allow cities, through the use of a fair and objective 23 fee structure, to create a district or districts within the city where fees will be raised on all 24 properties in the district, and that must be spent within the boundaries of the district. Street 25 improvement districts would also aid cities under 5.,000, giving them an alternative to the 26 property tax system and special assessments. 27 28 Metro Cities supports the authority of local units of government to establish street 29 improvement districts. Metro Cities also supports changes to special assessment laws to 30 make assessing state -owned property a more predictable process with uniformity in the 31 payment of assessments across the state. 32 33 5-E Highway Turnbacks & Funding 34 35 Cities do not have the financial capacity, other than significant property tax increases, to absorb 36 the additional roadway responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing municipal 37 tumback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turnbacks. 38 39 Metro Cities supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads on a phased basis 40 using functional classifications.and other appropriate criteria subject to a corresponding 41 mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and continued maintenance. 42 43 Metro Cities does not support the wholesale turnback of county or ' state roads without the 44 consent of municipality and the total cost, agreed to by the municiality, being reimbursed 45 to the city in a timely manner. 46 . WR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 54 "3C" Transportation Planning Process: Elected,Officials' Role The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) was developed.to:meet federal requirements, designating the Metropolitan Council as the organizationi , is-responsible for a continuous, comprehensive and cooperative (3C) transportation planning' lanning`process to allocate federal funds among metropolitan area projects. Input from local officials is an important element in the planning and prioritization of transportation investments in the region. Metro Cities supports continuation of the TAB with a majority of locally elected officials as members and participating in the process. 5 -G Photo Enforcement of Traffic Laws Enforcement of traffic laws with cameras has been demonstrated to improve driver compliance and safety. Metro Cities supports the use of photo enforcement technology. 5 -H Airport Noise Mitigation The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and the state should seek long -term solutions to fund the full mitigation package as adopted in 1996 for all homes in the 64 -60 DNL impact area. Noise abatement efforts should be paid for by fees and charges collected from airport users, as well as state'and federal funds. Furthermore, unless mitigation funding is provided, Metro Cities opposes any legislation that requires a property owner to disclose those properties that lie within 64-60 DNL noise contours. Acknowledging that the communities closest to MSP and reliever airports are significantly impacted by noise, traffic, and other numerous expansion - related issues: Metro Cities supports the broad goal of providing MSP - impacted communities greater representation on the MAC. Metro Cities wants to encourage continued communication between the MAC commissioners and the cities they represent. Balancing the needs of MAC, the business community and airport host cities and their residents requires open communication, planning and coordination. Cities must be viewed as partners with the MAC in resolving the differences that arise out of airport projects and the development of adjacent parcels. Regular contact between the MAC and cities throughout the project proposal process will enhance communication and problem solving. Metro Cities supports noise abatement programs and expenditures to minimize the impacts of AMC operated facilities on neighboring communities. The MAC should determine the design and geographic reach of these programs only, after a thorough public input process that considers the priorities and concerns of impacted cities and their residents. 17 1 5-I Cities Under 5,000 Population 2 3 Cities under 5,000 in population do not directly receive any non - property tax funds for collector 4 and arterial_ streets. Current CO r,.gtate Aid Highway (CSAH) distributions to metropolitan 5 counties are inadequate, to provide - forthe needs of smaller cities in the metropolitan area. 6 Possible funding sources include the five- percent set -aside account in the Highway User Tax 7 Distribution Fund, modification to county municipal accounts, street improvement districts, 8 and/or state general funds. 9 10 Metro Cities supports establishing criteria, such as the number of average daily trips, to 11 provide funding qualifications and a distribution method, in a,small.city local road 12 improvement program. 13 14 54 County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula 15 16 Even with the additional resources provided in 2008 by the Legislature through the 17 transportation finance bill, significant needs remain in the metro area CSAH system. The 18 additional revenue for the CSAH system will result in more projects being completed faster, 19 however, greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in cost sharing 20 activities, encumbering an already over - burdened local funding system. When the alternative is 21 not building or maintaining roads, cities bear not only the costs of their local systems but also 22 pay upward of fifty percent of county.road projects. Metro Cities supports special or additional 23 funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost participation in county road projects. 24 25 CSAH eligible roads were designated by county engineers in 1956 and although only 10% of the 26 CSAH roads are in the metro area, they account for nearly 50% of the vehicle miles traveled. 27 The new CSAH formula passed by the Legislature in 2008 increased the amount of CSAH 28 funding for the metropolitan area only from 18% in 2007 to 21% in 2011. The new formula will 29 better account for needs in the Metropolitan Area, but the new formula must only serve as is a 30 first step in providing additional resources for the Metropolitan Area. 31 32 Metro Cities supports a new CSAH formula more equitably designed to fund the needs of 33 our metropolitan region. 34 35 5 -K Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads 36 37 Minnesota Statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to submit 38 detailed plans with city cost estimates at a point one and a half to two years prior to bid letting, at 39 which time public hearings are held for citizen /business/municipal input. If MnDOT does not 40 concur with requested changes, it may appeal. Currently, that process would take a maximum of 41 three and a half months and the results of the appeals board are binding on both the city and 42 MnDOT. 43 Metro Cities opposes changes.to current statutes that would allow.MnDOT to disregard the 44 appeals board ruling for state Funk highways. Such_a change would significantly minimize 45 MnDOT's need.to negotiate -iq '-good faith with cities for appropriate, project access and 46 alignment, and would render the public hearing and appeals process meaningless. Metro 18 1 Cities also opposes the elimination of the county road municipal consent and appeal 2 process for these reasons. 3 4 5 -L Plat Authority 5 6 Current law grants counties review and comment authority for access and drainage issues for city 7 plats abutting county roads. 8 9 Metro Cities opposes any statutory change that would grant counties veto power or that 10 would shorten the 120 -day review and permit process time. 11 12 5 -M City Speed Limit Control 13 Cities are moving to incorporate multiple modes of transportation within existing right of way 14 through local Complete Streets policies on residential roads where traffic safety also affects 15 pedestrians and users of alternative transportation modes. Metro Cities supports design 16 standards that result in slower speeds on local roads. Any statutory speed limit change 17 must be uniform and provide adequate state funding for education and enforcement to 18 r ensure public awareness and compliance. 19 20 At cities' or counties' discretion, Metro Cities also supports a year round reduction of speed 21 limits within 500 feet of any city or county parks and schools or on roads whose characteristics 22 are becoming more residential or developed but will not vet justify a reduction under a MNDoT 23 sanctioned, speed study. . 24 25 5 -N MnDOT Maintenance Budget 26 27 The state has abrogated its responsibility for maintaining major roads throughout the state by 28 requiring, through omission, that cities bear the burden of maintenance on major state: roads. 29 Cities should be, compensated equitably for providing a service that traditionally has been borne 30 by the „state. MnDOT should also be required to meet standards adopted by cities through local. 31 ordinances or reimburse cities for labor, equipment and material used on the state's behalf to 32 improve public safety or meet local standards. 33 34 Metro Cities supports MnDOT taking full responsibility for maintaining state owned 35 infrastructure and aronerty, includine sound walls and right of way, within city limits. 36 37 5 -0 Transit Taxing District 38 39 The transit taxing district, which funds the capital cost of transit service in the Metropolitan Area 40 . through the property tax system, is inequitable. Because the boundaries of the transit taxing 41 district do not correspond with any rational service line nor is being within the boundaries a 42 guarantee to receive service, cities in the taxing district or out of the taxing district are 43. contributing unequally to the transit service in the Metropolitan Area This inequity should be 44 corrected. 45 46 Metro Cities supports a stable revenue source to fund both the capital and operating -costs 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 for transit at the Metropolitan Council. However, Metro Cities does not support the expansion of the transit taxing district without a corresponding increase in service and an overall increase in operational funds. To do so would create additional property taxes without a corresponding benefit. 5 -P . Complete Streets A complete street may include: sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes, comfortable and, accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes and more. A complete street in a rural area will differ from a complete street:in a highly urban area, but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road. Metro Cities supports options in state design guidelines for streets that would give cities greater flexibility to: • safely accommodate all modes of travel • address storm water needs • ensure livability in the appropriate context for each city. However, Metro Cities opposes state imposed mandates that would increase street infrastructure improvement costs in locations and instances where providing access for alternative modes including cycling and walking are deemed unnecessary or inappropriate as determined by local jurisdictions. 20 August 20, 2014 Mayor James Hovland & City Council Members 4801 W. 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am an Edina resident who attended the Edina Planning Commission meeting August 13, 2014. 1 was appalled at the events of the evening and feel compelled to express my concerns to you. As one speaker so succinctly stated` (after 3+ hours of public comment regarding the proposed 66 West), this meeting was not about who lives in Edina, who, raised their family in Edina, or even homeless adolescents: The purpose of this meeting was for the Planning Commission to examine the zoning codes currentlyin place relative to a request for re- zoning and changes to the existing Comprehensive Plan. I would encourage each of you to view the Planning'Commission meeting videotape relating to this topic, as I believe it clearly'demonstrates the significant "confusion experienced by,the members of the Commission around various aspects of the issues at hand. Earlier in the evening, Chairman Staunton made a comment along the line of "let's get this. done so we can send it on to the City Council for approval" - completely inappropriate, having been made' before all concerns from the Commission members had been expressed and addressed. A proposal to recommend approval of the, re- zoning request was voted on and FAILED. That should have been the end of this discussion. It wasn't, and Chairman Staunton, clearly biased toward allowing Beacon Interfaith to locate a multi -unit housing development into an area designated as a Regional Medical District, continued to push for it. The Commission members had tremendous difficulty even articulating the wording for a second vote — which shouldn't have taken place - and which appeared to be rendered under duress. I urge each of you to deny the request for re- zoning of this property, and to accept Tom Nelson's offer of assistance in finding a more appropriate and suitable location for this worthy incerely, York Avenue South #3115 Y MN 55435 Mayor Betsy Hodges 350 South 5m Street— Room 331 Minneapolis, MN 55415 -1383 Office 612 673 -2100 Betsv.hodges0minneaoolismn.00v August 21, 2014 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Mayor Jeff Jacobs City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: Proposed Sale of Minneapolis -Owned Land at 40a` and France Dear Mayor Hovland and Mayor Jacobs, In 2012, City of Minneapolis staff initiated discussions with your City Managers City Council about our intention to sell the 15 acre parcel at 40th St West and France Ave South. Barbara A. Johnson Our position, as consistently communicated to your respective City Managers, is City Council President Minneapolis is willing to sell the property at fair market value and that we would Council Member, Fourth Ward like to offer our neighboring cities the first opportunity to acquire. 350 South 5th Street— Room 307 Minneapolis MN 55415 -1383 Office 612 673 -2204 Fax 612 673-3940 TTY 612 673.2157 barbara .lohnson(&minne6aoismn.aov port City Information and Services www.d.minneapois.mmus Affirmative Action Employer To facilitate the discussion; Minneapolis staff obtained a boundary survey, soil borings and geo- technical data. This information has been provided to your staff. It is our understanding the underlying zoning is residential and the appraisal is based on that intended use. While there have been several meetings between our representatives the past two years, these meetings have not led to an agreed upon outcome and we have not received an offer to date. Minneapolis intends to move forward with selling the site. We are asking that this issue be given proper attention and we are requesting that we receive written offers that are reflective of fair market value by November 14, 2014, with closing planned by December 31, 2014. We remain hopeful that an amicable agreement can be reached. The lead staff person for Minneapolis is Greg Goeke, Director of Property Services, who has worked with your staff to date. Sincerely, ! �' " J j B, tsy Hodg s, Mayo Barbara Johnson, Council President cc: Kevin Reich, Chair of Transportation & Public Works Committee Linea Palmisano, Vice Chair of Transportation & Public Works Committee Kevin Carpenter, Chief Financial Officer Steve Kotke, City Engineer From: nathalie(cbtkdg.net [mailto:nathalie @tkda.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 2Q 2014 10:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us "form submission Name: Nathalie Shanstrom Organization: Kestrel Design Group Website: Address 1: 7109 Ohms Lane Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55439 Email: nathalie@tkdg net Phone: 952 928 -9600 Referrer: google. Message: I get off Highway 100 at the 70th Street exit every day and really enjoy the plantings in the median that were planted in the past few years (the hawthorn trees and native grasses). I think that is my favorite median i have seen anywhere. It really captures the regional identity of this area. I also love that. the grasses are left in place through the winter and not cut back until the spring. Winter is so long, it is such a nice visual relief to see the dormant native grasses along that median through the winter. Thank you IYN4 I 74��aj (A�Zoi�tGv o�f/� /` �zr�Ji a- nacme - v6ie. �, } 0 �40 Gladys Erlandson 6450 York Ave S Apt 4 g Edina MN 55435-2380 Heather Branigin From Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Sue Neuhart <sueneuhart@comcast.net> Tuesday, August 19, 2014 2:29 PM Edina Mail Walk with friends photo.JPG; ATTOOOOI.txt 1 2 KA % t J � J4r M1 yM ,g f' % t J � J4r M1 E f' Heather Branigin From: katherine thomson <kk.thomson1 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: backyard chickens ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: katherine thomson <kk.thomsonl@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM Subject: backyard chickens To: swensonannl@uWl.com Sorry Ann, I accidentally hit send before I finished my email... Bottom line, these chickens have been an overall terrible experience to live in close proximity to. 1. They are attracting foxes /coyotes at a rate that we have never seen before. The fox/coyote seems to know where there is a steady flow of chicken dinner. The sounds of birds being eaten/feathers all over our lawn is disgusting and disturbing. The fox/coyote even scaled my 6 ft privacy fence in front of my eyes the other day. I am concerned about my dog's safety in an enclosed back yard. Now, we see the fox/coyote (not sure which one is terrorizing our neighborhood) on a daily basis. Our neighbors are currently on our 4th batch of chickens... the first set were all roosters, the other three sets have all been dinner to the fox/coyote. My neighbor's have lost 3 of their cats due to the coyote in the past 30 days... the chickens have attracted these animals on a steady basis. My husband even said that the fox/coyote (I need to get out an animal identification book) had a small dog pinned up against our front door in early July that he rescued when he got home from work one day. 2. While my neighbors do keep their coops clean, they do smell. Anytime a strong north wind is blowing, we can smell them. It is not pleasant. The subdivided lots in Edina are too small for the most part to house chickens. I can't even imagine if someone in country club decided to keep chickens on those tiny tiny lots. 3. Even hens are not "silent ". They are nothing like the Rooster's morning alarm clock at 4a... but they have a sort of noise that they make when they are laying eggs. 4. When our neighbors let their chickens out to get some exercise, they end up in my lawn eating my boxwoods and scratching up my green lawn. It is not like an invisible fence will contain a chicken... no fence will for that matter, as they have been known to be found in our back lawn over our privacy fence and then we have to shoo them back over (they fly). 5. As far as the bees go, as someone who is highly allergic, this one terrifies me the most. While chickens are annoying, bees are life threatening tome. I don't want to end up 'dead' because my chicken raising neighbors have decided to become beekeepers with 300+ bees as well... It would change the way that I use my property, and that is not fair. We had a honey bee hive in our norway pine at the back of our property this spring, and we paid $400 to have it removed, as I could not be outside and feel safe. The honey bees fed off of my flowers and meyer lemon trees that surround our pool/landscaping constantly. They don't understand "no fly zones" much like chickens don't understand property lines. Like I said, the lot sizes are just to small to house livestockibees without making a neighbors life less peaceful. I get the current craze for a bucolic life in this busy world. Don't we all want to escape to the lake for the entire summer? I just wonder why so many chickens, end up in rescue situations every year. Seems to me, that we "urban hipsters" have perhaps bitten off more. than we can chew. I forsee a huge rise in calls to animal control over allowing these animals to dwell on 55 x 120 ft lots with such close proximity to another residence. Just my 2 cents... I spoke with Tim at animal control today, as I have "had it" with my neighbors chickens. He suggested that I contact my council members regarding these chickens and my experience. Best, Katherine (KK Strand) 2 Heather Branigin From: K B Montgomery <kmschoolmail, @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: Grandview Hi Lynette, Could you kindly forward copies of this letter to the City Council as well as the members of the Grandview CAT? Thank you much, Kim K B Montgomery kmschoolmail(&aol.com - - - -- Original Message--- - From: K B Montgomery <kmschoolmail(cD_aol.com> To: sneal <sneal cCaedinamn.gov> Cc: mail <mail(cD_edinamn.gov> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 3:27 pm Subject: Grandview Hi Scott, I wanted to follow up with you on the progress of GraandView. Now that the response period (for the RFI's) has closed, I understand that there will be a winnowing process to narrow the respondents to 2 to 4 candidates. As you know, the original process for.this CAT as described by Bill Neuendorf in the April 2013 work session and approved by the Council was for the CAT to review and weigh in on all of the respondents, in other words, to be involved in the selection of the RFI candidates. This was also affirmed by the Council in September 2013, when the Council made clear that they wanted the CAT to review RFI responses and make a recommendation to the Council. Given that the CAT has been disbanded and the original process dismantled, I have the following questions: 1. Who wil I be responsible for reviewing the RFI responses? 2. Who will be given access to the RFI responses? Bill Neuendorf has stated that the City intends to post all responses to the RFI on the Grandview webpage early in the week of August 18. Is that still the intention? 3. With uses for the 5146 Eden Avenue undefined, what criteria will be used to narrow the field? How will the City ensure that the developers who are advanced to the next step of the process will be the 'right fit for the project if the uses are not first defined? 4. Will members of the public have an opportunity to be involved in the process? If yes, who? 5. Will members of the second CAT be invited to participate in the process given their knowledge of GrandView and the time contributed to the process? 6. Both CAT members supporting (2 members) and opposing a development partner (6 members) called for a process to define community /public uses of 5146 Eden Avenue. What, if anything, has bee done to respond to their requests ?^ As you know, I first became involved in the Grandview process when I learned of the. proposed land swap that had happened without an open and involved citizen process. 'If, after 3 years of City process and countless citizen hours, the decision making again moves behind closed-doors, band many others in the community who care about public land will publicly voice our concerns. Thank you for your time and attention, as always. I hope you are well. Kim K B Montgomery Citizens for a Better GrandView 2 Heather Branigin From: Bryan A Lopez <Bryan.Lopez @hennepin.us> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:53 PM To: Alan Madsen (amadsen @maplegrovemn.gov); Anne Norris (anne.norris @crystalmn.gov); annitas @ci.hanover.mn.us; ArMand Nelson (mayornelson @comcast.net); bethk @homelinemn.org; bma rtens@ci.corco ran. m n.us; stboni @visi.coml; bheitkamp @ci.champlin.mn.us, bgadow @wayzata.org; Bryan Hartman (bha rtman@ Bloomington M N.gov); byron.laher @ceap.com; director @icafoodshelf.org; cboganey @ci.brooklyn - center.mn.us; Dan Madsen; dtolsma @ci.spring - park.mn.us; DanaYoung @mchsi.coml; dcallister @plymouthmn.gov, Deb Taylor (d.taylor @seniorcommunity.org); d.waletzko @seniorcommunity.org; Doug Grout (dgrout @ci.bloomington.mn.us); Doug Reeder(dreeder @ci.osseo.mn.us); Dusty Finke (dusty.finke @medina.mn.us); edurbin @eminnetonka.com; Elizabeth Weir (elizabeth .weir @ci.medina.mn.us); emax33721 @aol.com; Gary Keifenheim ( gkeifenheim @thefamilypartnership.org); George Selman (thirdwardgeorge @aol.com); Geralyn Barone (gbarone @eminnetonka.com); Ginny Nylen (gnylen @maplegrovemn.gov); guskarpas @mchsi.com; Heidi Nelson (hnelson @wayzata.org); helenchargo @sojournerproject.org; Jackie Olafson (Jackie @STEPslp.org); James Hovland, jamie .verbrugge @brooklynpark.org; Janet Jeremiah (jeremiah @edenpraide.org); Janet Lindbo Glindbo @homeswithinreach.org); Jeanne Karschnia Ukarschnia @edenprairie.org); Jeff Kulaszewiez abarnes @plymouthmn.gov); Jeff Sargent asargent @ci.new - hope.mn.us); Jeffrey Lunde Oeff.lunde @brooklynpark.org); jennifer.racho @capiusa.org; Jerome Faust (ferry.faust @ ci.saint - anthony.mn.us); Jesse Anderson Canderson@ci.brooklyn- center.mn.us); Jessica Loftus Oloftus @ci.orono.mn.us); Jim Barnes obarnes @plymouthmn.gov); jkohlmann @cityoftonkabay.net; jcox @ci.champlin.mn.us; John Sutter Uohn.sutter @crystalmn.gov); Joyce Repya; Judy Elling (Judy @resourcewestorg); Julie Deshler Qulie.deshler @crystalmn.gov); kandishanson @cityofmound.com; kbarton @cityofrichfield.org; Kate Frerich (kfrerich @treehouseyouth.org); Kathi Hemken (khemken @ci.new- hope.mn.us); Kenneth Guenthner (genera l@ci.corcora n.mn. us); Kevin Locke (klocke @stlouispark.org); Kevin Rebman (krebman @anovelplace.com); Kim Berggren (kim.berggren @brooklynpark.org); kmcdonald @ci.new - hope.mn.us; kluger @ci.excelsior.mn.us; LaDonna Hoy (Ihoy @IOCP.org); executivedirector @wecan- help.org; Lili McMillan (Imcmillan @ci.orono.mn.us); mglick @ci.robbinsdale.mn.us; mharris @capsh.org; Mark Bernhardson ( mbernhardson @ci.bloomington.mn.us); Mark Casey (markcasey @ci.saint- anthony.mn.us); Mark Grimes (Mg rim es@goldenva I leymn.gov); Mark Hanus (mahanus @frontiernetnet); Mark Steffenson (msteffenson @maplegrovemn.gov); Mark Thorson (mthorson @BloomingtonMN.gov); Mamey Olson (molson @stlouispark.org); marvdjohnson @gmail.com; mschneider @ci.loretto.mn.us; Matt Bower (matthew .bower @minneapolismn.gov); Matthew Ides ( matthew:ides @brooklynpark:org); Michele Schnitker (mschnitker @stlouispark.org); Mike Barone (mberone @ci.minnetrista.mn.us); Mike Mornson (mmornson @hopkinsmn.com); Molly Greenman (mgreenman @thefamilypartnership.org); mkoivumaki @edenprairie.org; nholden @iocp.org; Nancy Pauly (nancy.pauly @gmail.com); Nancy Tyra- Lukens (lukens @edenpraide.org); NW Hennepin Human Services Council (info @nwhhsc,org); Pat Smith (psmith @ci.excelsior.mn.us); Patrick Peters (patrick.peters @ crystalmn.gov); PauI.aasen @minneapolis.mn.gov; Paul Murphy ( information @familyhopeservices.org); Paula 'Dom (pdorn @plymouthmn.gov); Rdodge @ci.orono.mn.us; Rick Getschow (rgetschow@edenprairie:org); rpea rson@ci. rob bi nsdale.mn.us, Riley Grams To: (rgrams @ci.osseo.mn:us); Roger Hackbarth (rhackbarth @mapleplain.com); sborders @cityofdaytommn.coml; Scott Johnson (Scott.Johnson @ci.medina.mn.us); Scott H. Neal; Scott Weske (sweske @longlakemn.gov); Scott Zerby (szerby @ci.shorewood:mn.us); Spencer Agnew (sagnew @plymouthmn.gov); Stacy Unowsky (sunowsky @hopkinsmn.com); Steve Juetten (sjuetten @plymouthmn.gov); Steve Schmidgall ( sschmidgall @goidenvalleymn.gov); sstahmer @ci.rogers.mn.us; Steven Devich Ostark @cityofrichfield.org), Sue Gallus (s.gallus @seniorcommunity.org); Sue Sandahl (ssandahl @cityofrichfield.org); Sue Santa (susansanta @aol.com); Susan Hoyt (shoyt @ci.greenfield.mn.us); sgriffin @ci.minnetonka- beach.mn.usl; Terry Schneider (tschneider @eminnetonka.com); Tessia Melvin; Thomas Shaver (tom.shaver @opus- group.com); Tia Henry- Johnson (reap @isd.net); Tim Hultmann (tultmann @longlakemn.gov); Tim McNeil (tmcneil @cityofdaytommn.com); Tim Willson ( mayorwillsori @ci.brooklyn- center.mn.us); Todd Bartels (toddb @hanovereda.com); Tom Burt (tburt @goldenvalleymn.gov); tharmening @stlouispark.org; thirsch @ci.independence.mn.us; wlewin @ci.spring- park.mn.us; Wendy Webster (wwebster @stanthony.k12.mn.us); William Joynes (bjoynes @ci.shorewood.mn.us) Cc: Margo Geffen; Catherine M Gold Subject: Hennepin County Consortium Consolidated,Plan Survey All: Hennepin County's Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit invites you to complete the following survey regarding the Hennepin County Consortium Consolidated Plan for 2015 -2019. This survey is a critical part of identifying needs in Suburban Hennepin County which could be addressed through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding. Your input will contribute to formulating strategies as part of the consolidated planning process; we ask you please contribute your expertise of your locale by FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, . 2014. Survey Link: https:// www .surveymonk6y.com /s /HennepinCty ConPlan Feel free to extend any comments and questions.our way: Margo Geffen Manager, Housing Development and Finance I Margo.Geffen @hennepin.us Cathy Gold Administrative Assistant I Catherine.Gold @hennepin.us Thank you in advance, Bryan A Lopez Planning Intern Housing, Community Works and Transit I Hennepin County Public Works Bryan. Lopez@henneoin.us Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of;the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Heather Branigin From: Johnson, Aya <Aya.Johnson @mail.house.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 5:26 PM Subject: REMINDER: August 27, 2014 GSA Stakeholder Meeting Immigration Office Move Attachments: Aug27 StPaul Stakeholder invitation.doc.pdf This is a friendly reminder about next week's stakeholder meeting about the new location of the USCIS office. Make sure to RSVP by Friday. August 22 directly to USCIS at 0utreach.SPM @uscis.dhs.aov. Aya Johnson Community Representative Office of Congressman Keith Ellison (MN -05) 2100 Plymouth Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55411 Office: (612) 522 -1212 E -mail: aya.iohnson @mail.house.gov Website: www.ellison.house.iov From: Johnson, Aya Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:43 PM Subject: FW: August 27, 2014 GSA Stakeholder Meeting Greetings! As you may recall, the General Services Administration (GSA) reversed their decision to move the local United States Citizenship and Immigration Services office from a central location to a location away from public transportation. Congressman. Ellison, other members of the federal delegation and many state and local elected officials called on GSA to stop the move and work with local stakeholders to find a better location for our constituents. GSA plans.to have a stakeholder meeting about the relocation of the USCIS St. Paul Field Office. Many people informed me that they previously did not receive these notifications, so I am flagging this one. Please make sure to RSVP. directly with USCIS at Outreach.SPM @uscis.dhs.gov by August 22. Make sure to share this information with anyone who may be interested in attending. Warm regards, Aya Johnson Community Representative Office of Congressman Keith Ellison. (M N-05) 2100 Plymouth Ave North Minneapolis; MN 55411 Office: (612) 522 -1212 E -mail: ava.iohnson @mail.house.gov Website: www.ellison.house.gov From: Goudge, Laurie A [mailto:Laurle.A.Goudge(c uscis.dhs.gov] Sent: Monday, August-11, 2014 3:42 PM Subject: August 27, 2014 GSA Stakeholder Meeting To all — Please see the attached invitation to the GSA stakeholder meeting for August 27, 2014. Thank you, Leslie D. Tritten Field Office Director St. Paul Field Office U.S. Department of Homeland security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 2901 Metro Drive, Ste., 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 e�,ri�ry6N U.S. Citizenship to( and Immigration �,NJ,�� °) Services August 1.1, 2014 Dear Stakeholder: You are invited to a follow -up meeting with representatives.from the General. Services Administration (GSA) to talk about the new USCIS St. Paul Field'Office. This meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 27 at 3:30 Central Time at the Warren E. Burger US Courthouse & Federal Building located at 316 Robert Street N, St Paul, MN. We will gather in the jury assembly room, which is located immediately after passing through security on the first floor. If you plan to participate, please provide your full name and the organization you represent to USCIS via email at Outreach.SPM .uscis.dhs.gov by noon on August 22, 2014. I hope you will be able to join the discussion and look forward to hearing from you. Since ly, Leslie Tritten St. Paul Field Office Director www.uscis.gov Heather Branigin From: M.J. Bauer <mjbauer8495 @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9 :27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 Street West Please support the 66th street project. I am a lifetime Edina resident. My Husband and 1 live at 7609 Gleason Road, we raised 2 children in Edina. There are hundreds of Homeless youth in the western suburbs every night. beacon Interfaith is a superb partner with a proven track record in Homeless Youth Housing and support services. I have visited'tlieir4.Nieollet _Property and found it to be attractive and well run with grateful young people leading busy and productive lives,'going to school and work. Let's find a way to get this done and make a big step forward on Edina's commitment to Affordable housing M.J. Bauer Heather Branigin From:. Kay Bochert <kbochert@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:20 AM . To: Edina Mail ry Cc: Mike; Allison Johnson Subject: 66 West As you know from!your tour of Nicollet Square, Beacon is a very reliable landlord. Their program for teens will be for those who want to make 'a change and live a productive life. They will not sabotage their chances with vandalism or violence. These are young people like those who live in Edina, but were not lucky enough to have parents with a stable home and resources, we in Edina had. This is their chance. Thank you for voting for a wonderful housing program which will benefit our city. Thank you for voting for these young people who are our future, Edina's future. Kay and Mike Bochert Residents of Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: Mike Manhard <mike @mesh- mn.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:36 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please support 66 West for homeless youth Mayor Hovland. Greetings. As a resident of Edina, I wanted to send a note to ask for your support for the youth supportive housing project being proposed for 66 West. As the executive director of a nonprofit whose sole mission is to end homelessness, I want to stress how development like this is vital to meeting the needs of youth in our community who are experiencing homelessness. Resources for unaccompanied youth and young adults are extremely insufficient in our metro area. I am thrilled that Edina has the opportunity to step up and be a vital partner in meeting the needs of homeless youth in our community. Please help lead Edina in this role. I have long worked as partner with the developer, Beacon Interfaith. Lee Blons and her program are solid and have proven to be extremely valued community partners in the places where their housing has been developed. This projects access to transportation, groceries, jobs, medical clinics, library, the YMCA —this location is truly ideal. I ask for your support for the project on September 2 "d. Danielle and I hope to be in attendance on 9/2 (as we were 8/14) to voice our support. If you have any concerns about the project that I could help address, I would love to talk. Thanks so much for your service to the community. Thanks and take care. Mike Manhard 6709 Normandale Road Edina MN 55435 612 - 750 -1474 Mike Manhard Executive Director Metro -wide Engagement on Shelter & Housing (MESH) 740 East 17th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Cell -612- 750 -1474 Fax - 612 - 375 -9105 Heather Braniain From: tpaulson @1992ventures.com Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:42 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Dear Mayor and Council Members, I'm writing today to thank you for your recent vote to remove Indianola Ave, Juanita Ave, and W 51st Street from the proposed sidewalk plan. Thank you! Respectfully, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Avenue 1 Heather Branigin From: Julie Baker <djbaker2 @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:21 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: To Jim Hovland In Support of 66 West Hi Jim: Greetings!. I hope you've had a nice summer. It is hard to believe it has just been a few months since I saw you at the City Volunteer Awards ceremony at Braemar Clubhouse. The Edina High School student I attended with, Danzhen Lajia, is preparing to head off to Mankato State as I write this. And Doug and I are dropping our youngest off at college today. Signs of fall for sure. I am emailing today to let you know that I am a strong supporter of the 66 West development and to urge you to vote in favor when it comes before City Council on September 2nd. I first learned about the project at St. Stephen's Church, where I am a member and serve on the governing board. But my support stems from my personal experience working with students at Edina High School. That is how I met Danzhen, and how I have met a number of other students whose housing is precarious at best. These kids stay variously'with aunts and uncles and grandparents, and on friends' couches. They are doing their best to finish high school, but what then? One young woman I know of — an,Edina High School graduate — is working at Target. Her mother is an alcoholic and has unstable housing herself, so this young woman is on her own. She struggled to find an affordable apartment close to public transportation. Further it was virtually impossible for her to save enough money to pay a deposit and a month's rent while she was paying a nightly rate to live at a motel. Finally, she moved in with one of the EHS parent volunteers for several months to save some money. She ended up getting some assistance from a Minneapolis housing program that places young people with families until they can get their feet on the ground. Her story may have a happy ending. But there are others like her who may not be, so "lucky." We need 66 West to help young people like her — people who are hard working and need a helping hand to get their feet on the ground. And I firmly believe Edina will be a better community when we do that. I understand opponents' concerns, but I think there is ample evidence from other places where similar projects have been located to suggest we can make this work. Thanks for taking the time to read this email and for your consideration. If you think it would be beneficial, I would be happy to share this email with other council members. Just let me know. And thanks too for your service to Edina. We appreciate all you are doing for our city. Julie Baker Heather Branigin ` From: Christine Ott <extramileamericafoundation @yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:44 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Extra Mile Day in Edina Dear Lynette, Thank you for talking with me for a moment this morning and for passing on this information to the Mayor and, City Clerk. Last year, 444 inspirational mayors and city leaders stood up and jointly recognized November 1, 2013, as Extra Mile Day... a day to recognize the people and organizations who are creatingpositive change in our communities through their extra mile efforts in volunteerism and service. Proudly, we hold up Edina as a 2013 Extra Mile Day city, and we hope that you will join the mission again by making the.prodamaiion in 2014. (Proclamation language is at the.end of this email) This year, our mission continues ... and builds. Supported by a volunteer staff, Extra Mile America. (www.ExtraMileAmerica.ojg) is unwavering in its commitment to remind individuals and organizations that creating positive change is not just a water cooler topic, but it is unselfishly tied to go- the -extra -mile action. We continue to be an organization that casts a bright light on the "Extra Mile Heroes" and change - makers who surround us and who continue to give their best. Started in 2009 by Founder Shawn Anderson's vision that one person CAN make a difference, Extra Mile Day has grown from 23 participating cities in its inaugural year (2009) ... to an awesome goal of 500 cities this year. Whether it is one elected official or one non - elected government employee, whether it is one citizen or. one business with 1,000 amazing people, ONE does make a difference: By declaring November 1, 2014; Extra Mile Day, your city continues to be 'a part of this nationwide movement. Will you join us again this year and proclaim November 1 as Extra Mile Day? If the Mayor would like to do something beyond a proclamation, we have two options: 1) Submit names of local "Extra Mile Heroes." In addition to a November 1 declaration, submit 1 -5 names of amazing extra mile people and/or organizations that are making significant contributions to your city. These people /organizations will be included on our website with their specific contribution, and their names will be sent to the White House as extra - mile change makers whose service truly stands out and deserves to be recognized. 2) Submit a quote from your Mayor. In addition to a November 1 declaration, your Mayor's quote of what it personally means to "go the extra mile" will be highlighted on our website and shared with your local media. We are looking forward to your city once again leading the way, and if there is anything we can do to help you plan something special, we are happy to jump forward with our best effort on your behalf. Can we confirm you as a November 1, 2014, Extra Mile Day city? We look forward to "going the extra mile" with you again! Christine Christine Ott Christine@L-'xtraMileAmerica..ori 310 - 619 -3205 Here is sample wording: WHEREAS, (city, state) is a community which acknowledges that a special vibrancy exists within the entire community when its individual citizens collectively "go the extra-mile" in personal effort, voltuiteerism, and service;.and WHEREAS;,(city, state) is a community which encourages its citizens to maximize their personal contribution to the community. by giving of themselves wholeheartedly and with total effort, commitment; and conviction to their individual ambitions, family, friends, and community; and WHEREAS, (city, state) is a community which chooses to shine a light on.aud celebrate individuals and organizations within its community who "go the extra mile" in order to make a difference and li$ up Bellow members of their community; and WHEREAS, (city, state) acknowledges the mission of Extra Mile America to create 500 Extra Mile cities in America and is proud to support "Extra Mile Day" on November 1, 2014. NOW THEREFORE, 1, Mayor of (city, state) do hereby proclaim November 1, 2014 to be Extra Mile Day. I urge each individual in the community to take time on this day to not only "go the extra mile" in his or her own life, but to also acknowledge all those who are inspirational in their efforts and commitment to make their organizations, families, community, country, or world a better place. * Proclamations can be scanned and emailed to Christine( FxtraMileArnerica.org or mailed to 5034 Runway Drive, Fair Oaks, CA 95628. Christine Ott Director of Media and Public Outreach 310 - 619 -3205 Christine(MxtraMileAmerica. org 2 Heather Branigin From: Samuel.Rahamim < mayors= everytown .org @mail360.us2:mcsv.net> on behalf of Samuel Rahamim < mayors @everytown.org> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 10:48 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please join us Dear Mayor Hovland, Two years ago, my father was killed along with five of his co- workers when a former employee went on a murderous rampage at Accent Signage, our family business. I'm writing to ask you to become a member of Mayors. Against (legal Guns, which is a program of Everytown for Gun Safety and stand up for common- sense, life saving laws to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and other dangerous people. Today I work as a Field Assistant for Everytown for Gun Safety here in Minnesota. This advocacy work is deeply personal to me. It's a way for me to honor my father's legacy. To build support for this movement; I often reach out to fellow Minnesotans who have been affected by gun violence and to be there for them if they decide to share their stories. In the years since my father was killed, I've found that sharing my experiences allows others to grasp in a more personal way the pain that pervades too many cities and towns in this country. I know that by sharing our stories, we can inspire others to take action. It is in that spirit of inspiring action that I'm reaching out to you today. It means a great deal to myself and other gun violence survivors that more than 1,000 current and former mayors all over Minnesota and across America have added their voices to this movement. Mayors Against Illegal Guns is now a program of Everytown for Gun Safety, which is the largest gun violence prevention organization in the country and being a member of Mayors- Against Illegal Guns will give you a national voice on this issue and the opportunity to meet 1 and learn from our staff and from other mayors. To join, you only need to print, sign and return our statement of principles, available here. You can return it by email at mayors everytown.ora, by fax at 917 - 410 -6932 or mail it to: Mayors Against Illegal Guns MN 2751 Hennepin Avenue South, Suite 262 Minneapolis, MN 55408 Mayors are the ones who receive a call when a cop is shot or a child is killed by gun violence. I hope you will consider being a leader on this issue by speaking out and joining this coalition. Thanks for your time today. Together — and with your courage and leadership — we can help reduce gun violence. Sincerely, Samuel 0 0 O'l, 0 Everytown Facebook Twitter YouTube 2 Heather Branigin From: Tom Geng <gengt @aol.com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 11:44 AM To : tfurlong @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; PaulSkrede @mchsi.com; Edina Mail; mgaylord @ci.excelsior.mn.us; shams @goldenvalleymn.gov, dkind100 @gmail.com; emax33721 @aol.com; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; thultmann @longlakemn.gov, jeff.pederson @ci.medina.mn.us, betsy.hodges @minneapolis.gov; tschneider @eminnetonka.com; ahunt @ci.minnetrista.mn.us, Imcmillan @ci.orono.mn.us; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov; dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; szerby @ci.shorewood.mn.us; seinhardt @ci: spring- park.mn.us; jjacobs1956 @yahoo.com; AnneMavitySLP @comcast.net; gerryd @terradek.com; toconnor @ci.victoria.mn.us; cjohnson @ci.watertown.mn.us; kenwi I lcox@wayzata.org; jdoak.woodland @hotmail.com Subject: MCWD - Webcast/Broadcast of Public Meetings Attachments: Spring_Park_8- 20- 14.pdf Dear Mayors, I thought you would be interested to learn that Spring Park has become the sixth city in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to formally call upon the MCWD Board of Managers to broadcast its public meetings. Attached is a copy of the letter from Spring Park Mayor Reinhardt issued this week. If you, your Council or your staff`have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Tom Thomas W. Geng 4530 Enchanted Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55364 (612) 275 -6776 1 On Gdl§g Minnetonka August 20, 2014 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers Attn: James Spartz 15320 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 Dear Mr. Spartz and Managers, The City of Spring Park is requesting that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers begin broadcasting your regular board meetings via on -line web streaming and /or local community access cable. The Spring Park City Council feels there is a significant benefit to our residents and other communities within the watershed to have the ability to watch the board deliberations, discussions, and ultimately the decisions made by the board. The MCWD is inherently involved in many issues of importance to our community including water quality, surface water management, and AIS management. Having a broader and more convenient access to your meetings.is Important for the education of our residents and decision makers. Many Lake Minnetonka cities are members of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission (LMCC). The LMCC is an affordable and immediate option available to the MCWD: Regardless of the vendor you select, we feel it is an important part of government transparency to broadcast your board meetings. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, -Om' Sarah Reinhardt, Mayor Ci of rinSG rk 4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384 -9711 (952) 471 -9051 FAX (952) 471 -9160 Heather Braniain From: Lori Grotz <lori @lorigrotz.com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:34 PM To: Patrick Frimat, 'Tara Frimat' Cc: David Fisher, bwisner @minnehahacreek.org; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Joni bennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; sweiisonannl @'gnail.com, Cary Teague; Cindy Larson; Breanne Rothstein Subject: Can't get copies of surveys for 5508 Dever Dr Hi Patrick & Tara, We received our notice about the neighborhood teardown meeting for 5508 Dever Drive in the mail today, but see the email below about the change of date to Sept 2. I don't understand how Cary Teague can state in the email below that the house at 5508 Dever Drive can be torn down, when we don't know if the City has yet received accurate surveys and a working storm water management plan. It has been over 9 months since surveys /storm water, management plans were.first submitted. Jim stopped at Planning at least two times this week to attempt to get copies' of the 5th set of surveys and the storm water management plan by Advance Surveying and Engineering. He had time to briefly look at the surveys but was not allowed to obtain copies. It was something about Planning still reviewing the Information and the documents had not yet been booked in. The last time Jim was told to come back in a week. After you, Jim, and I met with Cary Teague and Ross Bintner at City Hall on July 8th, we were told by Cary that we would be notified when another set of surveys and storm water management plans came in. If the house is torn down before an accurate existing site conditions survey, proposed site conditions survey, and storm water management plan is on record, important information can disappear, like it never existed. We have been waiting for accurate surveys and storm water management plans FOR OVER 9 MONTHS. Since we have found so many inaccuracies, deficiencies, and omissions (not found by staff) in the previously submitted existing site conditions surveys, proposed conditions surveys; and storm water management plans, I am wondering if the owner is pushing for fast demolition before we can review plans again. The house cannot be torn down until all of the Edina survey requirements and the requirements of the MSBC/ IRC, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have been fulfilled. In my opinion, this doesn't pass the smell test. Lori - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:29 AM To: Cindy Larson;'Andrew Brown' Cc: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; James Grotz; lori @lorigrotz.com; Joni ben nettl2@comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: RE: Neighborhood Construction Meetings The builder has informed staff that they will be rescheduling this meeting to Tuesday September 2nd. A new notice will be sent out. The new home that is currently proposed for this lot requires a front street and a rear yard setback variance. The builder and new home owner have been notified that they would need variances for the project as proposed. At this time we are not sure if they will look at trying to move the home around on the site to meet setbacks, or move forward with the current plan and try for variances? No building permits will be issued for a new home on the site as the house is currently proposed, due to the setback issue. However, the homeowner could proceed with the demolition of the existing home, if they choose. Cary Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 952- 826 -0236 cteague @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing:Business - - -- Original, Message--- - From: Cindy Larson Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:01 AM To: 'Andrew Brown' Cc: Cary Teague; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; James Grotz; lori @lorigrotz.com; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: RE: Neighborhood Construction Meetings Good morning Andy, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I have a call into Mark Schaefer with Landmark to discuss this with him so he can re- schedule the meeting on a day other than a holiday. City Code does not restrict on time of day that the neighborhood informational meeting is held. There have been complaints about meetings being held during the day due to work schedules as well as in the evening due to sporting events, church commitments, etc. Please stay tuned for an updated meeting date for this project. Sincerely, Cindy Larson, Residential Redevelopment Coordinator 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952-833-95211 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 CLarson @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning;.. For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Andrew Brown [mailto:andrew.r.brown @att.net] Sent: Thursday, August. 21, 2014 5:07 PM To: Cary Teague; Cindy Larson; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; James Grotz; lori @lorigrotz.com; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl@gmail.com Subject: Neighborhood. Construction Meetings Don't think it's right that neighborhood construction meetings are allowed to take place on National Holidays or during work hours. How is anybody supposed to make this freaking meeting. I work hard to stay in Ed! ra.'This is complete BS Andy Heather Bran igin From: Anne Mavity <AMavity @beaconinterfaith.org> Sent: Friday, August 22, 20141:37 PM To: Edina Mail; jhovland @krausehovland.com Cc: Lee Blons Subject: 66 West clarifications Dear Jim, Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of 66 West, the 39 -unit apartment buildingafor suburban youth experiencing homelessness, that will be on the Council's agenda on .Tuesday, September 2 "d A number of issues have been raised recently, at the Planning Commission meeting and in letters submitted to the city, to which we would like the opportunity to respond and provide some clarity. Beacon's Executive Director Lee Blons will be out of the office this coming week and as the recently hired Director of New Projects, I'll look forward to personally following up with you next week to further clarify any questions you might have. Why this site? Beacon is a professional�housing developer with expertise in identifying and acquiring appropriate sites and buildings: Beacon hired a commercial real estate broker to assist in this search. Beacon met with Edina, city staff and council members to request advice about a good location in general as well as ideas about specific sites. As °you know, the, majority of Edina is zoned for single family homes. There is not much area zoned for multi- family''development. So we knew that to be able to create multi - family housing it would be likely that we would :need to ask the City Council to rezone. We felt that the Greater Southdale Area was the best location toaseek a site for several reasons' '. First, this -area provides entry- level, jobs, access. to public transit, and already has other multi- family housing development interwoven into the business /retail developments. Second, the greater Southdale area is also mentioned in the comprehensive plan: "Development in the Greater Southdale Area can meet the housing needs of Edina with options that may not fit in other locations within the city." (Greater Southdale Area Final Land Use and Transportation Study). Third, based on the needs of our tenants, this area provides access to jobs, services and transit that can be'easily accessed. Beacon selected this site after almost 18 months of conducting a thorough and methodical site search. We did look at a number of other sites. Initially, we were very excited about the former Best Buy site at the corner of York and 66th; only to find out that despite a sign that said "for sale" that it was only "for lease ". We Went' the extra mile and had our former board chair making calls and were notable to interest the owner in entertaining an offer on the property. We made an offer on another site on Ohms Lane that was turned down. We clearly were not in the ball park since they didn't even counter our offer. That property was zoned Planned Industrial and would have required the city to rezone as well. It•would also have isolated our tenants from the community. One of our major concerns on that site was that there were no sidewalks for our tenants to walk on from the closest bus stop that was 4.blocks away from the front door. We followed up all the leads given to us including the suggestion that there might be undeveloped land near the Southdale Y but we learned that there was no available land for development. We believe that this site is an appropriate site from the perspective of the city' s policies and guidance, as well as a great location for the tenants. It is integrated into an area that has a mix of uses; within three blocks there are offices, multi - family housing and retail. The density that we are proposing fits with the variety of density currently in use in this area; which varies from one story buildings to 18 story buildings within a few blocks. Cost and financing With nearly 500_ -units of housing that we currently own and operate, we are sophist icated'purchasers of property and understand the value of the property that we are acquiring. This property would be too expensive if we planned to tear down the existing building. We did not make our offer until we determined that we could convert the building into housing. Our project is small because of the limits of available; public funding. We cannot add units to bring down the cost per unit. Also, the current real estate market did not include .very many small parcels and a survey of purchase prices of commercial parcels' of similar size to our site show a similar cost per square foot to this site and that larger parcels have a lower cost per square foot.,So the comparison of $59,000 per unit for "our site" to $29,000 per unit for "other sites ", which are larger and able to spread cost-over more units, is an oranges to apples comparison. We do develop quality housing of affordable rents. We do not develop cheap housing. Public funders of affordable_ , housing expect a high level of quality and durability to safeguard the public's investment. Ensuring the development includes industry standards of quality design and construction now, will lower the operating and capital costs over the life of the public's. investment - the funders know this well from their experience over many years of funding affordable housing. Our total development cost, is on par with the development occurring in Edina like Lennar and One Southdale Place. We realize that there can .be some "sticker shock" about the cost of affordable housing development but this is not unique to this site or unique to Beacon. We will be scrutinized by our public funders to ensure that we are good stewards of the funds invested in this development. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has determined that the average Low Income Housing Tax Credit project in the Twin Cities costs $34,000 per unit higher than non -tax credit projects. We are working with our public. funders and the industry on cost containment strategies but we want to assure you that the cost of . this particular site is not an issue. Why now? Having spent the time to ensure that we have the right project at the right site, we have now applied for funding from our public funding partners. As you may know, developing affordable housing turns the development rules on their head, by first requiring site control and designing a project, prior to when financing is secured. Each June, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) solicits applications for.funding.and this year, the MHFA has an additional $100 million for affordable housing, that has not been available in past years, making it an especially timely application year. A funding request for 66 West was submitted this year to MHFA and our application is specific to this site. Changing sites would disqualify our application. Any delays in the project will require us to wait until the following June 2015 to re -apply as this opportunity only occurs once annually. We take our site selection seriously: Beacon and it's collaborative of congregations in Edina have already invested over $100,000 in this project and this site, much; of which would be lost if this project does not proceed. Creating a safe and welcoming. place for our tenants and neighbors Beacon is committed to ensuring a safe "place for our tenants and our neighbors._ We will have. professional on -site property management with high -tech key card entry and security cameras. We are committed to providing the level of staffing to ensure a positive environment for our tenants and neighbors, including overnight staffing. We are very concerned about the portrayal of our properties as unsafe by Step by Step. Their statement, " What this information shows is that there is an average of 14 police visits to the average Beacon property each month" ,is highly inaccurate and borders on the libelous. The information that their own letter contains shows that there is an average of 14 "91.1" calls (not police visits) for 10 properties; in other words, an average of 1.4 "911" calls per property which is significantly less than the 2.75 calls per month that they cite for the Colony. The averages that are listed individually for each property -are•also in error. All of the call totals should have been divided by 24 months to get the accurate. "per month" average. However, they greatly exaggerated the averages by removing the months with no calls from the average. For example, Third Avenue Townhomes had 6 phone calls in 24,months which they inaccurately calculated as 1.5 calls per month on average — rather than 1 call everyA months.which is the actual rate. When calculated correctly Nicollet Square averaged .2.8 "911" calls per, month- virtually the same as The Colony. As Lee Blons has discussed previously, "911" calls must be put in context and are not always a reflection on the behavior of our tenants. They can reflect on issues within the broader neighborhood in which our properties are located. If there is an issue with the behavior of a tenant, we believe the appropriate evaluation of a landlord is based on the responsiveness of the landlord and we have a good reputation with the neighborhood associations and the Minneapolis Police Department to take appropriate action. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify these issues. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly with any questions at 952- 913 -1108. Do- note that Lee Blons will be out of town until September 2 "d Sincerely, Anne. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative I Anne Mavity Director of New Projects I office: 651. 78.9 6260 eat. 220 ce11 :952- 913 -11081 2610 Univer.01), Avenue Rest, Suite 100. St. Paul, AN 55114 1 www. beaconinterfaidi org Heather Branigin From: Patrick Frimat < Patrick .FRIMAT @rsivideotech.eom> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 2:00 PM To: Lori Grotz; 'Tara Frimat' Cc: David Fisher, bwisner @minnehahacreek.org; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com, Cary Teague; Cindy Larson; Breanne Rothstein Subject: RE: Can't get copies of surveys for 5508 Dever Dr If the builder and homeowner have been informed that their plan would not be approved as is and that they will need variances for front and back set back, they may think twice before proceeding with demolition... But if they want to turn the corner lot into a park for neighbors to enjoy.... Patrick Frimat - - -- Original Message-- - From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori @lorigrotz.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 201412:34 PM To: Patrick Frimat; 'Tara Frimat' Cc: dfisher @edinamn.gov; bwisner @minnehahacreek.org; sneal @edinamn.gov; jhovland @edinamn.gov; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; mbrindle @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; cteague @edinamn.gov; clarson @edinamn.gov; brothstein @edinamn.gov Subject: Can't get copies of surveys for 5508 Dever Dr Hi Patrick & Tara, We received our notice about the neighborhood teardown meeting for 5508 Dever Drive in the mail today, but see the email below about the change of date to Sept 2. I don't understand how Cary Teague can state in the email below that the house at 5508 Dever Drive can be torn down, when we don't know if the City has yet received accurate surveys and a working storm water management plan. It has been over 9 months since surveys /storm water management plans were first submitted. Jim stopped at Planning at least two times this week to attempt to get copies of the 5th set of surveys and the storm water management plan by Advance Surveying and Engineering. He had time to briefly look at the surveys but was not allowed to obtain copies. It was something about Planning still reviewing the information and the documents had not yet been booked in. The,' last time Jim was told to come back in a week. After you, Jim, and I met with Cary Teague and Ross Bintner at City Hall on July 8th, we were, told by Cary that we would be notified when another set of surveys and storm water management plans came in. If the house is torn down before an accurate existing site conditions survey, proposed site conditions survey, and storm water management plan is on record, important information can disappear, like it never existed. We have been waiting for accurate surveys and storm water management plans FOR OVER 9 MONTHS. Since we have found so many inaccuracies, deficiencies, and omissions (not found by staff) in the previously submitted existing site conditions surveys, proposed conditions surveys, and storm water management plans, I am wondering if the owner is pushing for fast demolition before we can review plans again. The house cannot be torn down until,all of the Edina survey requirements and the requirements of the MSBC/ IRC, and the MInnehaha Creek Watershed District'have been fulfilled. 1 In my opinion, this doesn't pass the smell test. Lori - = - -- Original Message---- - From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Friday, August 22,20149:29 AM To: Cindy Larson; 'AndrewBrowri' Cc: Scott H. Neal; JamesHovland; James Grotz; loci @lorigrotz.com; Jonibennettl2@comcast. net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @'edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: RE: Neighborhood Construction Meetings The builder has informed staff that they will be rescheduling this meeting to Tuesday September 2nd. A new notice will be sent out. The new home that is currently proposed for this lot requires a front street and a rear yard setback variance. The builder and new home owner have been notified that they would need variances for the project as proposed. At this time we are not sure if they will look at trying to move the home around on the site to meet setbacks, or move forward with the current plan and try for variances? No building permits will be issued for a new home on the site as the house is currently proposed, due to the setback issue. However, the homeowner could proceed with the demolition of the existing home, if they choose. Cary Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952- 826 -0460 1 Fax 952-826-03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 cteague @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - -- Original Message- - From: Cindy Larson Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:01 AM To: 'Andrew Brown' Cc: Cary Teague; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; James Grotz; lori @lorigrotz.com; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: RE: Neighborhood Construction Meetings Good morning Andy, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I have a call into Mark Schaefer with Landmark to discuss this with him so he can re- schedule the meeting on a day other than a holiday. City Code does not restrict on time of day that the neighborhood informational meeting is held. There have been complaints about meetings being held during the day due to work schedules as well as in the evening due to sporting events, church commitments, etc. Please stay tuned for an updated meeting date for this project. Sincerely, Cindy Larson, Residential Redevelopment Coordinator 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN.55424 952-833-95211 Fax 952- 826 -0389 CLarson @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Andrew Brown,.[mailto:andrew.r.brown @att.net) Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:07 PM To: Cary Teague; Cindy Larson; Scott H Neal; James Hovland; James Grotz; lori @lorigrotz:coml Jonibennettl2 @comcast:net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Neighborhood Construction Meetings - Don't think it's right that neighborhood construction meetings are allowed to take place on National Holidays or during work hours. How is anybody supposed to make this freaking meeting. I work-hard to stay in Edina. This is complete BS Andy 3 Heather Branigin From: Jean Coltz <iean.coltz @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 2:13` PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Questions Concerning Proposal for Rezoning 333066th St. West- Friday, August 22, 2014 To: The Planning Commission and Members of the City Council As a one. -time resident of Edina for 30 years - -my career, working with troubled youth, spanning three and half decades --I am understandably drawn to the issue of rezoning the TCF Bank property at 3330 66th St. West. Question 1': 2 In my viewing of a'rrieeting with the City Council (Lee Blons presenting), the council asked a number of relevant questions concerning the aesthetics of the proposed site. However, I did not see any attention given to the specificity of the internal program at all: restrictions (all temporary- rental - living residences in Edina do state them within their leases), expectations and goals. I would think a handbook, not only given to each resident, but reviewed as an orientation -would serve as the foundation to attaining success. Question 2: The operative goal seems to be that every resident will be either attending school, working or both. However, in examining a page on the Beacon Interfaith website, which has now been deleted, there was a chart profiling the Lydia Apartment residents (located on Lasalle). The bottom 2 categories took me aback; (1) 100% of the residents are Mentally Ill and (2) 75 % have a criminal background. My question is this: Guesstimating the population makeup of your proposed residence in Edina, how would that Lydia profile compare in these 2 areas? Question 3: The Edina Liquor Store is only 2 1/2 blocks away. Your proposal states that resident ages :will span from 17 years of age to those in their early twenties. Since your population will include legal and under age drinking ages, specifically how will you control the intake of alcohol on the premises to those who might 'party' and are underage? Will alcohol use be restricted on the premises? I address this as a 21 year former resident in a high density building in Edina. As a daily stairwell walker for exercise, I had the experience of coming upon under age drinkers who would 'party' quietly at night with a bottle of whiskey in 'a stairwell, letting in their friends from the neighborhood by strapping flat the back door security latch with multiple layers of strapping tape. Question 4: Since illegal substances have become a factor in our culture, what policy will be in place and enforced in regard to both usage and marketing of those drugs? Question 5: It is my understanding that Beacon Interfaith does not manage the properties that they acquire; companies such as Common Bond serve in that capacity. If this is the case, why aren't we,hearing the voices from the eventual management company? Speaking with the everyday people who will be in charge is, I believe, is not only important, but essential. Thank You,. J. L. Coltz Heather Braniain From: jean coltz <jean.coltz @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 36.08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: BEACON chart (now deleted) Attention: Deb Could you kindly attach this to my letter of concern sent just moments ago? It is important. Thank You. J. L. Coltz Sent from my Wad Begin forwarded message: From: jean coltz <iean.coltz@gmail.com> Date: August 18, 2014 2:35:15 PM CDT To: jean coltz <jean.coltz @gmail.com> Subject: BEACON PROFILE OF RESIDENTS httn:// www. beaconinterfaith .org/sites /default/filesBeacoii Newsletter %2017all %202013 WEBx Sent from my Wad i Heather Branigin From: Jean Coltz <jean.coltz @gmail:com> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 12:40 PM To: Edina.Mail Subject: CORRECTION TO MY LETTER SENT 8 -22 -2014 8 -24 -2014 TO: The Planning Commission and The City Council: My Question 2, Lines 3 and 4 stated, in reference to the Lydia Apartments, which were featured by BEACON on their website this May -- now deleted 100% of the residents are mentally ill ". That statement is incorrect and should have read (as their chart reads) "100% have a a Disability of any- kind* *-Disabilities include mental illness, alcohol or drug abuse, HIV/AIDS." THANK YOU! J.L. COLTZ 1 Heather Branigin From: Mindy Ahler <mindy @coolplanetmn.org> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:25. AM To: Edina Mail; Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; cmilner @edinamn.gov; Scott H. Neal Subject: Acres DuBois concern - we need more public input Dear City Council and City Staff, In talking with my neighbors more questions and concerns have come to light in the development of Acres DuBois in the Morningside neighborhood. I have heard unconfirmed rumors that the plan might be approved by the city without further public input. I attended one of the public meetings with City Homes and I appreciated meeting those involved with the project, their forward thinking and their concern to do what is best for the neighborhood in this development. To truly find the, solution that is best for the neighborhood (and provide a model of best practices for development in Edina) I believe that a public hearing is necessary before approval of this plan. Conversations before the approval of the plan must include the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and water management experts. I'm sure there are other cities that could also provide suggestions from their experience managing water in development. It is critical that we get this development right and properly manage the storm water runoff to prevent disastrous and costly consequences to neighboring homes and to properly manage the adjoining public property. Edina is known as a leader in so many ways - this is an opportunity to show our leadership in storm water management and the best way to redevelop Edina that strengthens our neighborhoods and builds community. Please require a public hearing with water management experts before approval of the Acres DuBois project. Thank you for your continued hard work for the City of Edina that makes this community a great place to live! Mindy Ahler Co- Director, Cool Planet mindva.coolnlanetmn.or www.coolnlanetmn.ora (o /h) 952- 920 -1547 Heather Braniain From: David Braden <dbbraden @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Council Members, My husband and I have lived in Edina for nearly.30 years and recently moved from the Brookview Heights neighborhood to a townhouse at CoventrV ,Lakes. We love the city and all of the wonderful amenities we have enjoyed over the past three decades. It would be a credit to Edina to welcome others such as the young adults who would live at 66 West. We are not affiliated with the group or churches sponsoring the project but are writing independently to encourage you to vote in support of 66 West. Ann and David Braden 616 Coventry Lane Edina, MN 55435 1 Heather Branigin From: Tom Geng <gengt @aol.com >, Sent: Saturday, August 23, 201411:50 AM To: wcbushnell @frontiernet.net; prechelbacher @msn.com; erdahl @spacestar.net; lekelee @aol.com; Tfbaltutis @gmail.com; prisbue6 @gmail.com; slivcadson @usinternet.com; tcasey @frontiernet.net, kingslynn25 @yahoo.com; dovolis @cs.umn.edu; kgothberg @msn.com; lucymilt @msn.com; h20 ,Johnson @hotmail.com; mkjol @kjolhaugenv.com; jlofgren @cahillswift.com; richardmanser @icloud.com; srmohn @comcast.net; dmoltmans @comcast.net; mto @umn.edu; mrosenberg @advanceins.com; nw @weberarchitects.com Cc: tfurlong@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us;.PauISkrede @mchsi.com; Edina Mail; mgaylord @ci.excelsior.mn.us; sharris @goldenvalleymn.gov, dkind100 @gmail.com; emax33721 @aol.com; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; thultmann @longlakemn.gov, jeff.pederson @ci.medina.mn.us; betsy.hodges @minneapolis,gov, tschneider @eminnetonka.com; ahunt @ci.minnetrista.mn.us; lmcmillan @ci.orono,mn.us; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov; dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; szerby @ci.shorewood.mn.us; srei nhardt@ ci.sp ring- pa rk.mn. us; rick @rgvisions,com; jjacobs1956 @yahoo.com; AnneMavitySLP @comcast.net; gerryd @terradek.com; toconnor @ci.victoria.mn.us; cjohnson @ci.watertown.mn.us; kenwillcox@wayzata.org;idoak.woodland@hotmail.com Subject: MCWD Transparency, Openess and Accountability - LMCC Attachments: 2012_Lundberg- Mamayek_emails.pdf Mr. Bill Bushnell, Chair Ms. Peter Rechelbacher, Vice Chair Mr. Jerry Ciardelli, Treasurer Ms. Lee Keeley, Secretary All Members MCWD Citizens Advisory Committee Dear CAC Officers and Members: I am,compelled to bring another misrepresentation. of material fact made by MCWD President White in both versions of President White's now- withdrawn Op-Ed to the Sun Sailor and Sun Current newspapers. As you will recall, President White withdrew that Op-Ed from both newspapers after Michael Osterholm, Ph.D. and Eric Evenson- Marden brought to her attention the fact that she had made a number of misrepresentations of law and fact, some of which were clearly defamatory in nature. In both versions of her Op -Ed, President White asserted, in relevant part, as follows: "Speaking of transparency, the District has a long- standing commitment to openness and accountability in its meetings... The financial implications of expanding video recording to board meetings, which would require an investment in additional equipment, professional services and staff time, is under consideration. R5710. -ARuo tac tf mote viwe.are not4av ar In the context of her Op -Ed, the clear implication of President White's highlighted assertion is that, historically, there has been no interest in televising MCWD Board meetings to MCWD communities. Having doubts about the truth of this asserted "fact," former Senator Gen Olson dropped in on the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission ( "LMCC ") on August 18, 2014. Contrary to the implication of Present White's. assertion, Senator Olson learned from LMCC staff that the LMCC had in fact contacted the MCWD several years ago with a proposal for the LMCC to televise recordings of the public meetings of the MCWD Board of Managers. Senator Olson suggested I investigate this matter further. Yesterday, as reflected in the email below, I spoke with LMCC Operations Manager Jim Lundberg, who confirmed that he had discussions with MCWD Communications Director Telly Mamayek in November and December 2012 about the LMCC's proposal to televise MCWD public meetings. Operations Manager Lundberg also sent me the attached emails which confirm that he met with MCWD Communications Director Mamayek on December 3, 2012 at the Shorewood City Hall to discuss this proposal. Significantly, President White has been avMCWD Manager since March 2012. Consequently; President White either knew, or reasonably should have known, that her assertion about the alleged lack of interest in televising MCWD Board meetings was untrue. Now, in all fairness to President White, the LMCC is not a "local cable station." Rather, "[t]he Lake Minnetonka . Communications Commission (LMCC) is an agency formed by a Joint Powers Agreement between 12 area' communities, whose purpose is to oversee the franchise agreement with the cable operator, currently Mediacom, and to promote awareness and use of community television." http: / /www.Imcc- tv.org /about- Imcc.htmi Nevertheless, in the context of President White's now - discredited and withdrawn Op -Ed, I submit this is a distinction without a difference. I further submit this is yet another example of the controlling majority of -the MCWD Board to play fast and loose with the legal and factual aspects of the truth and the historical record in an effort to justify the controlling majority's votes and actions. I respectfully urge the CAC to consider, discuss and, if appropriate, make an appropriate recommendation to the Board of Managers regarding President White's assertion of "fact' as part of the CAC's statutory duty under Minnesota Statute §103D.331, Subd. 1a (https: / /www.revisor.mn.aov /statutes / ?id= 103D.331) to: "(4) consider issues pertinent to the functions and purposes of the watershed district; (5) review and comment on reports, minutes, activities, and proposed projects of the managers; and (6) report to the managers the general content of advisory committee meetings and resulting recommendations." Very. truly yours, Thomas W: Geng 4530 Enchanted Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55364 - -- Original Message From: Jim Lundberg <jim @lmcc- tv.org> To: 'Tom Geng' <gengt @aol.com> Sent: Fri, Aug 22, 201410:25 am . Subject- RE: MCWD - LMCC Mr. Geng, By now, you should have received any and all of the a -mails that reference my 12/3112 meeting With MCWD Communications Director Telly Mamayek. At our meeting, I offered the MCWD a means of broadcasting their meetings on our Government Channel 20. Ms. Mamayek noted that they would be moving from their Deephaven location to a new office in Minnetonka. That she hoped they would be outfitting their new facility with similar recording capabilities as the City of Shorewood and that once they did, she was hopeful that the LMCC would be contacted to begin airing their meetings. I never heard back from Telly after that and the LMCC experienced a very tumultuous 2013 and I did not get a chance to follow up with her regarding the status of broadcasting these meetings. Jim Lundberg Operations Manager LMCC From: Tom Geng [mailto;Qengt(Daol.coml Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 8:58 AM To: jim(a)-lmcc- tv.orq Subject: Fwd: MCWD - LMCC Jim, Thank you for taking my call this morning. It is my understanding from.our conversation that the LMCC approached the MCWD in 2012 with a proposal to broadcast recordings of the MCWD's. public meetings of its Board of Managers,, and that you met with MCWD Communications Director Telly Mamayek in December 2012 to discuss the LMCC's proposal. ' Would you please,forward to me a copy of the emails you have confirming that you met with Ms. Mamayek in December 2012? Would you also briefly describe what happened to this proposal? Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Please feel free to call if I can ever be of assistance to you or the LMCC. Tom Thomas W. Geng 4530 Enchanted Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55364 (61 2)275-6776 - -- Original Message-- - From: Gen Olson <gen.olsong- )frontier.com> To: Tom Geng <gengtOaol.com> Cc: szerby <szerbyAg mail. com >; scott <scottOgamersdigital.com >; dsiakel <dsiakeI4,)gmail.com >; dkind100 <dkind1000__gmail.com >; PaulSkrede <PaulSkredeOmchsi.com >; marvdjohnson <marvdiohnson0_gmail.com >; ahunt <ahunt(&ci.minnetrista.mn.us> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 9:32 am Subject: Re: MCWD - LMCC Tom, LMCC is a public access channel as I was reminded in my conversation at their office. They will broadcast any MCWD recorded meetings.. provided to them. If MCWD has the equipment, a volunteer could operate it. What extra costs would need to be incurred? There is no charge for the broadcasting to the people in the cities they cover whether those city councils use their.service or not. Thanks for pursuing this further. Gen Sent from my iPhone C7 - Mai Monda tin From lmiqndberg.;-jh� ' Subject FftMondaftmeeUng- Date: Fri. APO -22, 2014.9,45 bir � �f 1 ���� ^°�=^ °^~. .... ,` Scut. Mon* Pe�r.03.2611,12646PM ' " I'm on my wayl ' Sent fnOmnmyPhone ^ - rm� Nov 30,1012 at 9:41: � - "Jim - W Telly, | _ See,you `thmng: Jim tundbarg Operation s Man ager - - ._) -' ' Tot Julle Moore; finalmo�tv.pre Subject. MandaVsIneetibg HiJuria Xt_�U a�^,, 1/1 _-='--�_-�-----_--_---�-_ _-__-_ _-_ ___-��-__--___----"=-'�-_ —__`_-- ' th6etiAg. Page: 2 pf'2 I'M hoping W6. can move.Opq4 pm, meeting qt!Shorevf.. J City ,Hall on Monday, Dec 3: to pm a me Please 14 me" know if that for you_ if not.] t kp.ow: Yo4f avail ON Ity later in the weak' ilrb pretty .bboki d on Wedne . SQ1 . Y,-:b . ut, I'm ble, . rest e wok::: Thanks, Telly - Telly MaWayvi; 11 Coin mun"tions Director Nfinne,fi.aha`C-reek. Watershed: .District: Dirw 952,64,1.4509 11 Cell 0615043.6121 18202 Minnetonka Blvd,= Deephowen, MN 55391 ��wwxiliqfiehy —hacmek.2M us/ AM .4S bidil/Pt"in kssage 8/23/2014 FW: Last Night's Meeting and MCWD Meetin on Monday Page t of 2 From: Jim Lundberg:. {pm @ImCe- ty.org� To ;genM<gengtQaolcom> Subjeci:.FVV: Last Night's Meeting and:MCWD- Meeting on Monday; Date..FO, Aug. 22, 2014 9:45 am' From Odc Moore [n�ailto JMaa��?ci:slioreivon�mn�vs] Sent: Tuesday, November 27,-2012 02 P1VI To :7im Lundberg Subject: RE: Last Nigtat's Meeting and.Iv1CWD Mee tingon Monday New location will be by the Marsh on lVinnetonka.Blvd, i think it #s supposed, to be spring that they move., but I' Can't remember fdr sure: From. Jim.Lundberg malt :'i c IDjcc- ty.orQ]: Sent: Tuesday, November 27,2012.11 59 A1V( To: Julie Moore. $ub,ect; RE: Last Night's Meeting and MCWD Meeting on Monday l'illook at your.system fora headphone solution on.Mori y. l Think 1 canApke an:.audio,out off the back of the dvd recorders:: Not sure what audio port`.yau are Geeing on the f rout of a deck but will look at that.as well, Discussions with the MCW.D are prelirninary If itisn't too far, we would be willing to go into Minnetonka as the water stied I district does affect :a number of our LMCC cities. At this point, they are just; exploring the possibit'ity_ They haven't been given approval; yet from their°board. Jim Lundberg Operations Manager LMCC (952)4.7:1 -7.125 x1Q4 From: JulieMoore retail to: .iMootena.ci,sliorewood.nin.us] Sent: Tuesday; Novem er 27; 20121 1;53 AM To: Jim Lundberg: Subject: RE: Last Night's Meeting and MCWD Meeting.on.Monday: hops l /mailiabl.com/3871I..;-Ill/" ao1- b /en -us /m ail/PrintMessage.as... 8/23/2014 FW Last Night's Meeting and MCWD Meeting on Monday Page 2 of 2 I. had already tested and knew. It'wprl; d- .earr:said she would commCmicate with Pat's4 I didn't leave a.ngte. Guess.( should'have left him a note I didn t realize we,:couldn't °get sound through the headphones. I went and looked and is there a, way .to get some sort of audio headphaheoff of a I]1(R? There is no jack for the. headphones of earbuds .,. any :way something, could come off °of the audlojacR on;the front ?' Yes —Telly wants a tour, They are moving their: offices to: Minnetonka, 'so you might wa. ntao make sure you get dates on that unless you.would still record once the : n:Minnet .n . ust so-you don'twaste your tinie!).'1'm. not sure. .how that:works for you guys: From: Jim: Lundberg,[naiiro:jlm lnicc-tv.Qm Sent : -Tuesday, N4vembor27, 2012' 9 50.AM- To: Julie.Moore Subject: Last Night's Meeting and MCWD Meeting.onMonday Hi Julie, Got a call;from Pat last night. He was concernedthat there,would be no'audio;on1he recording.of last night's meetings,.) had him run a' quick ,test on a dvd, finalize it'and then play it in the dvd: playas to verify audio. Audio was there so there was no Inue2i The meetings recorded fine.. I.:spoke with Telly dm, the MCWD, yesterday They are; considering .haying us re_ cord and, Olt their meetings. She mentioned that site was meeting with you next Monday afternoon 2pm. She asked if t meet be available as well and l told heel could'make the meeting. Sounds like „she just wants to tour yourchambers and ask questions regarding your:system and the LMCC. I'll take a look at your system then. to see if therg:'is another means of monitoring the -audio until'after the'.. meeting:on 12110. If not, we maflust have..to tape it without monitoring: capabilities. Not:a_great solution but:'at least itworked fast night: Your thoughts? Jim;;Lundberg: Operations Manager LMCC (052)4 1- 1125.x104. https: // mail aol.com /3871 1 -11 x /aol -b %emus /mail/Pr PSs.age.as.., 8/23/2014 FW- Last Nilkht'sMeeong.and MCWD Meet ngon Monday Page Vof 2 From.: Jim Lund.hOrq!1iM@lmc.d-tv.org:?_ To:. gengt <gengt@aoi.com> Subject: F.W: Last (Might's Meeting and MCWD Meeting bri.MoncI4. Fri, Aug 22, 2014:.0:45 am - From.jullic moore LnjammormcAnciAtio oodimnal At: TdOd4y, Ndvdth,bd 27, 201211 .53 AM; To i Jinn t1m. eag Su6ject: RE: Lbst Nios Meetin . and MDWOM&COng. on Mond AY: 'I had already tested and knew it worked—Jean, seildi.she would communicate With Pat Sol didn't l,eaVe . a note.. Guess. I should, �have .left him a note. I didn't realize we c . oulcln't:get sound through the.headphones. Ivent and looked and is there a wa �to get some sort of audilo,heatip Y_ headphone off cif. a DVR? There .1s%hojack for the headphones or. ear- buds any way could come offo . f the audio jack on the front? Ydii,—Telly Wants ;a tour. They :.9re:nov1hg their offices to Mi netorka 1,80 YOU M gh. t want to ma k e sure :you dWs.orl that unless-youwould still record r once.: they are 1n:M1hnetonka:Oust;, so you don't:wastp: your Ume!). I'mz not .swre. how 1h, atworks . . lor yq4 qu.yql. Spnt:. Tuesday; :i.Novernber 2 7, . 21)12 9;50 AM, To: Allic Moore ...... Subject:, Lost Nigbes Mecting and MCWD Micting on Monday. Got aca: 11. from Pit last night. He:iwas con,66rnedthat1horewould be no aqftbn the :recording of last.night's meetings, j had him. run. aquick test on-a dlvd, flie ita fin-. I em A nd h play It in: the 4vO player to.. verlfy.audio. Audio was thereso there was no Issue The meefts recorded fine. re , I spoke:Wlth Telly:from: the MCWD yesterday, They a considering having ante d I th meetings: Bir., . air She mentioned that she was meeting with You next :Monday _afternoon 2prn. '.Slie asked .tf1:me-et_be avallable as Welland I told her i could make the -meeting. Sounds like AejUst Wants -to tour, your chamber's and ask questions regarding your system, and the LMCC. 11 take.a look at your,:sy$tpft-then, to sesifthere is another means; of.moriltoring,the audio until after the meeting -�. on. UJI0. It not; we may just have to tape it without monitoring capabilities. Not. a great solution taut at 'least: it worked 1pstrilljOt, httpsi/./tna,il..ao,t..cocci /38711 -1 1 I/dol-6/on-us/mail/PrAntA46 . ssage.n... 8/23/2014 FW: Last Night's Meeting and MCWD Meeting on Monday Page 2 of 2 Your thoughts? Jim Lundberg Operations Manager LMCC (952)471- 7125 x104 https : / /mail.aol.com/ 3871. 1 -113 / aol- 6 /en- us /mail/PrintMessage.as... 8/23/2014 Heather Branigin From: Tom Geng <gengt @aol.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 12:21 PM To: wcbushnell @frontiernet.net; prechelbacher @msn.com; erdahl @spacestar.net, lekelee @aol.com; Tfbaltutis @gmail.com; prisbue6 @gmail.com; slivcarlson @usinternet.com; tcasey @frontiernet .net; kingslynn25 @yahoo.com; dovolis @cs.umn.edu; kgothberg @msn.com; lucymilt @msn.com; h20 ,johnson @hotmail.com; mkjol @kjolhaugenv.com; jlofgren @cahillswift.com; dchardmanser @icloud.com; srmohn @comcast.net; dmoltmans @comcast.net, mto @umn.edu; mrosenberg @advanceins.com; nw @weberarchitects.com Cc: tfurlong @ci.chanhassen.mn.us, PauISkrede @mchsi.com; Edina Mail; mgeylord @ci.excelsior.mn.us; sharris @goldenvalleymn.gov; dkind100 @gmail.com; emax33721 @aol.com; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; thultmann @longlakemn.gov, jeff.pederson @ci.medina.mmus; betsy.hodges @minneapolis.gov,, tschneider @eminnetonka.com; ahunt @ci.minnetrist&mn.us; Imcmijlan @ci.orono.mn.us; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov; dgoettel @cityofrichfi.eld.org; szerby @ci.shorewood.mn.us; sreinhardt @ci. spring -park mn.us, rick @rgvisions.com; jjacobs1956 @yahoo.com; AnneMavitySLP @comcast.net; gerryd @terradek.com; toconnor @ci.victoria.mn.us, cjohnson @ci.watertown.mn.us; kenwillcoxCcbwayzata.org;jdoak.woodland@hotmaii.com Subject: MCWD - Failure to Timely Make Meeting Minutes Available Mr. Bill Bushnell, Chair Ms. Peter Rechelbacher, Vice Chair Mr. Jerry Ciardelli, Treasurer Ms. Lee Keeley, Secretary All Members MCWD Citizens Advisory Committee Dear CAC Officers and Members: In both versions of her now - discredited and withdrawn Op -Ed, President White asserted, in relevant part, as follows: "Speaking of transparency, the District has a long - standing commitment to openness and accountability in its meetings. Agendas, meeting materials and minutes are posted in a timely fashion on the'District's website." It appears from visiting the District's website this morning that President White's concept of "timeliness" is at odds with any reasonable person's concept of timeliness. As of 12:00 p.m. this. afternoon, the District has no minutes from any Board meetings conducted after June 26, 2014. hLtp://minnehahacreek.org/minutes In addition, the District's website contains agendas, but no minutes, from the following other 2014 meetings conducted before June 26, 2014: Board Meetings • June 12, 2014; and • January 30, 2014 Board Committee Meetings • June 19, 2014 (Policy and Planning Committee); • April 30, 2014 (Policy and Planning Committee); • April 3, 2014 (Operations and Program Committee); • March 20, 2014 (Policy and Planning Committee); • March 6, 2014 _(Operations and Program Committee); • February 20, 2014 (Policy and Planning Committee); • February 6, 2014 (Operations and Programs Committee); and • January 16, 2014 ((Policy and Planning Committee). Moreover, the only minutes from 2014 CAC meetings are those from January 16, February 12 and June 18. http : / /www.minnehahaereek.org/eac- minutes/ At the very least, one would think that President White would visit the District's website before making assertions of fact about the timely availability of meeting minutes. I submit this is yet another example of President White's proclivity for asserting "facts" that are contrary to the record. I therefore respectfully urge the CAC to consider, discuss and, if appropriate, make an appropriate recommendation to the Board.of Managers regarding: • The MCWD's failure to timely make all approved meeting minutes available on its website; and • President White's erroneous assertion that the District "timely" posts all meeting minutes on its website. These matters, I submit, clearly fall under the CAC's statutory duty pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 103D.331, Subd. la(https://www.revisor.mn.pov/statutesl?id=103D.33 I) to: "(4) consider issues pertinent to the functions and purposes of the watershed district; (5) review and comment on reports, minutes, activities, and proposed projects of the managers; and (6) report to the managers the general content of advisory committee meetings-and resulting recommendations." Very truly yours, Thomas W. Geng 4530 Enchanted Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55364 (612) 275 -6776 Heather Branigin From: Judith Andersen <judyandy @comcast.net> Sent Saturday, August 23, 2014 5:00 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague@edinarealty.com; Edina Mail Subject: 66th Street Proct for'Homeless Youth We wish to let you, as a city council member,, know that we are strongly in favor of establishing the apartments for homeless youth at the 66th St site in Edina. It is the right thing to do for the young people -who need our help and for the city of Edina which needs to offer affordable housing and services for this population. Thanks in advance for a positive vote. Kay Larsen and Judy Andersen 6313 Halifax Ave South Edina, MN 55424 1 Heather Braniain From: Claire Dempsey <dempseymn @aol.com> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 201412:54 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail:com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcastnet,.joshsprague@edinarealty.com Subject: 66 West Housing - please vote. YES Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I have lived in Edina for 19 years with my husband and our three children. I ask you each to vote YES on the question of 66 West Housing for homeless teens. What an opportunity we have to do good in our community and help these young people continue on a positive path for their life. The proposed location is perfect — near jobs, transportation, and many potential places of employment. The need is great — it is hard to believe that there are homeless teens in this part of the metropolitan area, but there are. Our capacity is huge as a COMMUNITY to make a difference and share our abundant resources and volunteer spirit with these emerging adults that will in turn contribute back to our community as they grow up. So, please vote yes.. It will make a positive difference in so many ways for Edina. Thank you for your consideration, Claire Dempsey 4624 Browndale Ave Edina MN 55424 dempseymnCc)-aol.com Heather Branigin From: Dave Horan <davehoran03 @gmaii.com> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 20143`.24 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66th st youth shelter Mayor Hovland - We wish to let you know that we are strong supporters of the: youth homeless shelter project on 66th street. This is something our city.needs to do to put our money where our mouth has been. This is something we can truly be proud of along with so much else this city does well. Thank you for your continued service to this city. Dave and Michelle Moran 4215 Lynn Ave Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Branigin From: Ward <wgodsall @live.com> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 8:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Support for the 66 West Project Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Swenson, Brindle, Bennett, and Sprague: This letter is in support of the 66 West Project, that is being proposed for the Southdale area, to provide affordable, supportive housing for homeless teens. As a parent who, has lived in Edina for 21 years and raised and educated two children in our public schools, I have been very grateful for the services that the city provides for our youth. However, as difficult as it is to accept, all of our children are not "above average ", and some of the youth in the Western Suburbs have not been successful, for various reasons. As a community, we have the opportunity to reach out to these people and give them a second chance, by providing a healthy, safe and nurturing environment, enabling them to get back on track in their growing process. We should take advantage of this opportunity to support these youth with a program such as this, which has been proven to work in other neighborhoods. The decision in front of the council is apparently one of zoning. This area is zoned for regional medical services. I have practiced medicine for 30 years, the last 21 here in Edina, both at Fairview Southdale Hospital and now with Allina Health at 7500 France Avenue. The paradigm for medicine is shifting from managing illness to promoting health. Both Allina and Fairview have focused on this idea with branding changes — Allina changed its name from Allina Hospitals and Clinics to Allina Health, recognizing the importance of its mission as a promoter of health. The longer one is in medicine, the more one realizes how much of the "illness" we see is based in social and psychological problems rather than purely medical ones. Maintaining the health of our youth, which is key to the future of the community, will be aided significantly by providing a healthy and nurturing environment for those youth who are at risk for the social and psychological problems which will result in medical problems. In that sense, this project would fit with the medical zoning of the Southdale area. Every society will be judged by how it cares for its disadvantaged members, its widows and orphans. As a community, Edina should extend care to its members who need this help, thereby strengthening the community in the future. For these reasons, I urge you to approve this proposal so that it can move forward. Sincerely, J. Ward Godsall, MD 5601 Johnson Drive Edina, AV 55436 Heather Braniain From: ellyrw @aol.com Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 9:49 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Teen Supportive Housing; Project Dear Council Members - -I am a longtime Edina resident, and I am writing to urge your support for the 66 West Teen Supportive Housing Project. Although teen homelessness is,sometimes invisible, we know it exists in Edina and other southwest suburbs, and these young people need help and support to become productive members of society. I am concemed that even though there has been a stated commitment to having affordable housing in Edina, we have very few affordable units, and I believe we need to increase ,that number. Supporting the 66 West Teen Project is a wonderful way to do that. -I believe the proposed site is an excellent spot for this project and that the "project is well planned. As with other similar projects by the people proposing this project, I feel confident it will be very successful and well run. I hope you will vote "yes" for this project on September 2nd. Eleanor Wagner, 5529 Vemon Ave. South, Edina, MN i Heather Braniain From: Stephanie A Tesch <stephanie.tesch @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 25, 201411:38 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: City Council: proposed Youth Housing project Dear Council, Please give your approval to the proposed housing project for homeless youth, to be constructed near Southdale. The city does a great deal to promote the welfare of affluent children through sports facilities, rec programs and more. Teenagers on their own deserve support, too, especially at such a crucial point in their lives. Not.every young person has family that cares or can help. The proposed location seems ideal, next to businesses that can offer employment Transportation is a huge barrier for young people. Please show that Edina cares) Thank you, Stephanie Tesch 5605 Johnson Drive Edina Heather Branigin From: Cathleen Godsall <cgodsall @live.com> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 12:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please Vote Yes to Support 66 West Apts Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council members: Swenson, Brindle, Bennett, and Sprague, This is the third letter I have written to you all over the course of the past 6 months in support of the 66 West teen supportive apartment project scheduled for your final review and hopefully "super- majority" approval at the September 2, 2014 City Council public hearing. As a licensed social worker who has had to deal professionally with the challenges of access to affordable housing and the reasons for homelessness, I was still shaken to realize the magnitude of teen homelessness in our southwest suburban communities- -where on any given night 200+ teens are experiencing the anxiety and safety issues of homelessness. During these past 6 months I have immersed myself in learning and sharing with others the details of the 66 West Apartments supportive housing project for 18 -22 year olds who through no -fault of their own, find themselves struggling to survive and meet their daily needs while trying to mature into adulthood - - -- without a home that can provide safety and stability. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and our area churches' 18 month "logistical research journey" have identified a solid location for this supportive housing project across from Southdale with access to entry - level jobs, mass transit to get to jobs and school as well as being a safe neighborhood to call home. The discussion at the Planning Commission about these apartments fitting into the comprehensive zoning plan as a medical district seems to fit nicely when one views medical care progressively, as healthcare, which is much more comprehensive than traditional medical services. A community that offers multi- faceted health and wellness services is a community that is healthy physically, mentally and spiritually. Edina can be that community for these teens! (These teens would be screened as appropriate and "learning- ready" to capitalize on the benefits of the supportive services the apartments offer to help them mature into self - sufficient citizens). Lastly, I believe safety is of utmost importance to our planners for both the teen residents and their neighbors, in order to make this endeavor successful. Please refer to the detailed e-mail you were each sent on August 22 from Anne Mavity, Beacon's Director of New Projects, in which she describes the safety measures that are built into the plan and clarifies the mathematical errors in the 911 call statistics that the Montessori school presented at the City Planning Commission public hearing on August 13. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration to this request to vote to approve 66 West Teen supportive housing apartments. Together we can make our communities accessible to all our neighbors, no matter what their needs! Sincerely, Cathleen Godsall, LSW 5601 Johnson Drive Edina, MN 55436 Heather Brani gin From: Deb Grossfield <debgrossfield @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 4:26 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Morningside, Development Dear Mayor Hoveland, We've met several times and I've. supported you with yard signs, humble cash, & my good recommendation. I think you've been doing:a wonderful job. I'm writing to you today with the hope that you'll turn__ your -attention to our neighborhood regarding an important issue. I live on 42nd Street in Morningside and am concerned about the plan to change the drainage system in my neighborhood. While this change may not affect my home, there is a serious risk that it will affect many of my neighbors. I'm also concerned that the developer involved has created a division between Morningside neighbors that has upset the friendly environment we are known for. I've spoken with several neighbors and we'd like this development to stick with the originally proposed drainage system for reasons I've'outlined below. Please slow down this development and allow the neighborhood to get enough information to understand the risks involved. We'd also like another public meeting to discuss the plan. In addition, the risks & design problems involving drainage is so complicated, it would be wrong to have such a meeting without a truly knowledgeable advocate for the neighborhood. A commercial developer cannot be expected to properly educate our homeowners about these decisions. Please read the following and let me know your thoughts. Sincerely, Deb Grossfield 4406 West 42nd Street Edina, MN 55416 1 1) The developer has an option that was already approved that would mean quite a bit of excavation on their private land. This option allows for a'duplicate drainage system (which we currently have) and improves upon1hat system.It could mean cutting down trees but the number of trees is within the discretion of the developer. They could choose new drainage chamber routes with any number of trees. They could also plant trees to replace any trees they 'cut down. 2) The developer initiated a petition with the folks that live at the top of the hill with the goal of saving more trees by changing the already approved drainage system plan to a 2 "d option. Since they can already choose to cut down very few trees, this petition was misleading and unfortunately pits the homeowners at the top of the hill against those at the bottom. 3) The 2nd drainage option is to change the already working double drainage system into one drainage system. This drainage change has uncertain basement flooding consequences for those that live at the bottom of the hill. This option would move the excavation from the private land at the top of the hill to public,land at the bottom of the hill. It shifts the.risk_& responsibility from private land to public.:This option would benefit the developer but would not benefit the neighborhood as a whole. 4) Another problem with the 2nd option for drainage is that the neighborhood will not be able to plant trees on the changed public land. Trees would interfere with the drainage system land the drainage system will interfere with the growth of trees. While the developer has mentioned putting a soccer field on this public land, the promise of a soccer field is not a good trade for the option of future trees. 5) There has:also- been talk about reducirg;,the risk of flood for homeowners at the bottom of the hill with shifting .the drainage to a pond -near: 420 Street & France. This pond is already overloaded with drainage and, many of the basements near there already have flooding issues. Debra Grossfield Comptroller debszrossfield@jzmail.com 952.926.7709 Office/Home 612.616.5705 Mobile 2' Heather Braniain From: Robert Hobbins <hobbins.robert@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 25, 201410:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members, Imagine in your mind's eye an otherwise welcoming, caring community that has posted at its municipal boundaries signs reading, "Those seeking affordable housing are not welcome" and "Those wishing to develop affordable housing need not apply." That would be shocking, wouldn't it? Yet, gas a result of our dismal record in providing affordable housing, that is essentially what we in the City of Edina have done. As a community, we have raised to an art form the matter of finding reasons to reject affordable housing proposals. The process begins by indulging the dubious assumption that anyone in need of affordable housing must present a serious risk of criminal behavior. From this basic assumption, we proceed to create a pervasive climate of-fear and stigma around the persons to whom such housing might be provided -- whether it be youth, single parent families, or even the elderly. For good measure, we seek out supportive "data," erroneously equating 911 calls with police action and misinterpreting (or even misstating) facts to support a predetermined conclusion. This predictably results in a groundswell of opposition, however misinformed, that is sufficient to kill most initiatives. Lest there be any lingering doubt about the outcome, however, there is plenty-left in the playbook. There is the tried and true "kill it with kindness" approach. The script for this tactic goes something like this: "This is a great idea. We support the concept. It is just that this is not the right place. There just has to be abetter place somewhere else. If you can find that other place, we're behind you 1,000 %." The genius of this tactic is that it can always be clothed in terms to �be. found in the comprehensive plan or the zoning ordinances, lending a veneer of civility to what is actually the"classic "not in my backyard" response. What goes unnoticed is: (1) that the comprehensive plan expressly embraces the expansion of affordable housing as one of its professed goals, (2) that both the planning commission and the city council are vested by that plan with discretion to depart from its terms to achieve other civic goals(see, e.g.,6500 France Project), and (3) that neither the plan nor the zoning ordinances designate any specific area for affordable housing, leaving no place for such proposals to call "home" in either document. This last fact can easily be perverted into finding a basis in the plan and/or the zoning ordinances for rejecting any affordable housing proposal in any location within the City without fear of stumbling over any conflicting terms in either source. If all else fails, there remains the old stand -by of delay, based on the assertion that more public discussion is needed, that, more time should be taken to explore alternative locations, etc., etc., etc. In the meantime, options to purchase - expire, handing opportunities are missed, costs mount, and most proposals will die a natural death, giving the City yet another credible basis to deny any accountability. No one doubts for a moment the Council's ability to reject this proposal to create. an affordable housing opportunity with supportive services for homeless youth. Our community track record on affordable housing leaves no question of that. I.appeal to you to seize this opportunity -- with a reliable and proven developer, a proposed site in the very locale now frequented by our homeless youth, and a demonstrable need -- to begin to take down those virtual signs at our community borders and to finally live up to our professed commitment to provide affordable housing in our City. I appeal to you to accept and adopt the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Please give us all something we can at last be proud of on this front. Thank you. Robert L. Hobbins 4,708 Upper, Terrace Edina, MN 55435 Church of St. Patrick z Heather Branigin From: Lili McMillan <LMcmillan @ci.orono.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 20148:54 AM To: Debra Kind; Tom Geng Cc: ahunt @ci.minnetrista.mn.us; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; Paul Skrede; Scott Zerby; tfurlong @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; Edina Mail; Mark Gaylord; sharris@goldenvalleymn.gov; emax33721 @aol.com; thultmann @longlakerrin.gov; jeff.pedersori @ci.medina.mn.us; betsy.hodges @minneapolis.gov; Terry Schneider; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov; dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; sreinhardt @ci. spring - park.mn.us; jjacobs1956 @yahoo.com; AnneMavitySLP @comcast.net; Gerry De La Vega; toconnor @ci.victoria.mn.us; cjohnson @,c i.watertown.mn.us; Ken Willcox; Jim Doak; gen.olson @frontier.com; woody@woodylove.com; Jan Callison Subject Orono Letter to MCWD Attachments: MCWD Letter.pdf The Orono City Council approved 4 -0 the attached letter to be sent to the MCWD regarding broadcasting of their monthly meetings. Lili McMillan Mayor • City of Orono, Minnesota 612 - 840 -8484 MCWD Board of Managers clo Executive Director Jeff Spartz 15320 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 To the MCWD Board of Managers: CITY OF ORONO Street Address: MaNing Address: 1 Telephone (952) 249 -4600 2750 Kelley Parkway :?i P.O. Box 66 I Fax {952) 249 -4616 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.d.orono.mmus s, August 25, 2014 The MCWD is intrinsically involved with so many issues of importance to our community including water quality, surface water management, land use permitting and the control of aquatic invasive species. The ability to easily view the discussions, debates and decisions that are made on these issues is critical to the understanding and education of our residents and decision - makers. Due to this importance, the Orono City Council requests the Board of Managers immediately consider broadcasting the Board's regular monthly meetings for its constituents. In an effort to provide transparency and easy access to decision - making, most of the cities in the watershed district videotape and provide convenient viewing of their council meetings. This is becoming standard in promoting government accountability and building public trust. With its significant impact on residential and economic activities, the MCWD should join with its member cities in utilizing this digital technology to be as transparent as possible in its operations. We would be glad to share our knowledge gained in recently updating our website to handle videotaping, live streaming and web streaming of our meetings. Please feel free to speak with our city administrator, Jessica Loftus, if you would like to learn more details of our system. We thank you in advance for your consideration of this request and look forward to hearing your discussion on this issue at an upcoming MCWD board meeting. Sincerely, Mayor Lili McMillan On behalf of the Orono City Council. Heather Branigin From: Tom Geng <gengt @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:15 AM To: LMcmillan @ci.orono.mn.us; dkind100 @gmail.com Cc: ahunt @ci.minnetrista.mn.us; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; PauISkrede @mchsi.com; szerby @ci.shorewood.mn.us; tfurlong @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; Edina Mail; mgaylord @ci.excelsior.mn.us; sharris @goldenvalleymn.gov; emax33721 @aol.com; thultmann @longlakemn.gov, jeff.pederson @ci.medina.mn.us; betsy.hodges @minneapolis.gov; tchneider @eminnetonka.com; kslavik @plymouthmn.gov, dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; sreinhardt@ci.spring- park.mn.us, jjacobsl956 @yahoo.com; AnneMavitySLP @comcast.net; gerryd @terradek.com; toconnor @ci.victoria.mn.us; cjohnson @ci.watertown.mn.us; kenwillcox @wayzata.org; jdoak.woodland @hotmail.com; gen.olson @frontier.com; woody @woodylove.com; jan.callison @co.hennepin.mn.us Subject: Re: Orono Letter to MCWD Dear Mayor McMillan, Thank you very much for your timely email this morning. Orono has now become the seventh city in the District (joining Deephaven, Greenwood ,Independence, Minnestrista, Shorewood, and Spring Park) to call upon the MCWD to broadcast or webcast its public meetings. In light of the fact that that MCWD is currently considering the amount of its tax levy increase for 2015, the need for greater openness, transparency and accountability by the MCWD Board of Managers in the way conducts itself has never been greater. Very truly yours, Thomas W. Geng 4530 Enchanted Drive Shorewood, Minnesota 55345 (612) 275 -6776 - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Lili McMillan <LMcmillan(aD-ci.orono.mn.us> To: Debra Kind <dkind100(cD-gmail.com >; Tom Geng <gengt -) aol.com> Cc: ahunt <ahunt(cD-ci.minnetrista.mn.us >; marvdjohnson <marvdiohnson(aD-gmail.com >; Paul Skrede <PaulSkrede(a)-mchsi.com >: Scott Zerby <szerbv(cD-ci.shorewood.mn.us >; tfurlong < tfurlong (oci.chanhassen.mn.us >; mail <mail(ZD,EdinaMN.gov >; Mark Gaylord <mgavlord(cD-ci.excelsior.mn.us >; sharris <sharris cD-goldenvallevmn.gov >; emax33721 <emax33721 a- a6Lcom >; thultmann <thultmann(aD-IonQlakemn.goy>; jeff.pederson < Leff .pedersonCcDci.medina.mn.us >; betsy.hodges < betsy .hodges(aDminneapolis.gov >; Terry Schneider <tschneider(a).eminnetonka.com >; kslavik <kslavikCcD-plymouthmn.gov >; dgoettel < dgoettel (a)_cityofrichfield.orq >; sreinhardt <s rein hardtCcD-ci :spring- park.mn.us >; jjacobs1956 <liacobs1956(cD-yahoo.com >; AnneMavitySLP <AnneMavitVSLP(a)-comcast.net >; Gerry De La Vega <gerryd(CDterradek.com >; toconnor <toconnor(aD-ci.victoria.mn.us >; cjohnson < ciohnson(a)_ci.watertown.mn.us >; Ken Willcox <kenwiIIcox(cDWayzata.org >; Jim Doak <idoak.woodlandicDhotmail.com >; gen.olson <.qen.olson(cD-frontier.com >; woody <woody(cDwoodylove.com >; Jan Callison <jan.callisonO -co. hennepin. mn.us> Sent: Tue, Aug 26, 2014 8:53 am Subject: Orono Letter to MCWD The Orono City Council approved 4 -0 the attached letter to be sent to the MCWD regarding broadcasting of their monthly meetings. Lili McMillan Mayor Y City of Orono, Minnesota 612 - 840 -8484 Heather Branigin From: Allison Johnson zAJohnson @beaconi6terfaith.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:18 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: support for 66.West Attachments: Support 66 West Endorsements.pdf Members of the Edina City Council: The attached are messages of support for the 66 West Development. Members of the community signed an online petition at hftps'.i/beaconinteirfafth.wufoo.com/forms/i-support-66-west/ with messages to you as city leaders in favor of supportive housing for young adults near Southdale. Their names, addresses and contact information are included along With their comments. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative I Allison Johnson Congregational Partnership Organizer 1 651. 789 6260 ert. 214 1 2610 Liniversity Avenue if'est. Suite 1 DO, St. Parrl, ,k.f,'V 551141 www. beaconinte& aith. org 1 I would welcome supportive housing for young adults in Edina, and I ask Edina city leadership to do the same! Name " Judith Semsch Please share a few words about why you We lived in Edina for 30 years and have been members of St. endorse this project. * Stephen's Episcopal church for most of that time. We are passionate about housing and especially for youth. We took our god- daughter in for a couple of weeks, until she realized that being home with her mom was better than not having a bed. Her first Inclination was that it would be cool to live on the streets.... how scary for a lovely 15 year old girl. We need alternatives for those youth who do not have good parents. Name* Jay Rudl I would welcome supportive housing for young adults in Edina, and I ask Edina city leadership to do the same! I grew up In Edina, and spent a large part of my adulthood living there. I still shop, attend church and go to restaurants in my hometown, and keep abreast of Edina sports and activities. I find it ludicrous and astonishing that anyone would believe that providing affordable housing in Edina would in any way "threaten" the community, Its standards /values, or business potential. I find it egregious that, in every community (Edina included,) local businesses knee -jerk assume that the presence of affordable housing for vulnerable persons (of any description) or group homes for disabled persons, in some way would "harm" business or business prospects. Maintaining homeless citizens homeless has been shown to cost over $100K /year EACH, while helping them become "homed" costs less than $20K /year. These are costs we ALL share, across the board, and do not land solely or even primarily on the backs of local business owners. EVERY community has to permit affordable housing, so that the difficulties faced by lower- income persons are not concentrated, that is, "ghetto - ized," Into segregated areas where those problems multiply. I would welcome supportive housing for young adults in Edina, and I ask Edina city leadership to do the samel Integrating citizens who are have reason to be struggling In life, into our healthy communities, Is the best way to give them - and us - a chance at safety, sanity and access to prosperity. "Kicking" those who are already unwilling victims while they are down serves no purpose. Support this initiative to help abused and victimized homeless youngsters to a place of safety! Thank you! 0 J Heather.Braniain. From: Mary Tomback <mktomback @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Youth Housing Mayor Hovland and members of the City Council, I am writing in strong, enthusiastic support of the proposed youth housing facility at 66 West. I am an active member of St. Stephen's Episcopal church and have diligently helped rally support for this project among St. Stephen's parishioners, most of whom are Edina residents. I reside in St. Louis Park, and no doubt many teens and young adults in my community as well as Edina's and others in the west metro will benefit from this facility. I am personally aware of the challenges homeless youth face. During the 2013 -2014 school year, my parents took in a homeless 18 year old (Derek) struggling to complete high school. His father was a drug dealer evading arrest; his mother abandoned:him repeatedly. Derek couch hopped and slept in his car. He worked throughout the school year, most nights until 12 am, bussing tables at a Mexican restaurant. The $700 he had managed to save from that job was stolen by one of the people who let him crash on her couch. My mother was one of his high school teachers. She and my dad let him move into their spare bedroom. For the first time in years, he had regular meals, a bed of his own, and some help with transportation when his car broke down (which happened often). My mom helped him coordinate with city agencies and school officials to apply for college, financial aid, and scholarships. This past year, Derek moved into his dorm at a local university, majoring in nursing. Derek would likely not have gone to college (and perhaps not even graduate high school) if it wasn't for the stability and assistance he received during,his last year in high school. Too many young people have had such stability taken away from them, through no fault of their own. We have an opportunity to return that to them so they can get their lives on track, and this proposed site in Edina in uniquely suited to offer these young adults the BEST possible chance for success. We ALL benefit by helping these young people become contributing, successful members of our society. I am so proud to be part of Edina's community -- through our church, our many close friends who are Edina residents, and all of the many businesses and restaurants we are loyal to in Edina - - and I would be incredibly proud to know that Edina chose to be part of the solution to the problem of youth homelessness, rather than a contributor of it. Please don't turn your backs on these kids. Respectfully, Mary K. Tomback Heather Branigin From: laurieb @tcq.net Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 20141:36 PM To: Edina Mail Dear decision makers, f am an Edina resident, senior, -and concerned citizen. I respectfully request that you vote to approve the 66 West development. This: development is consistent with the long range plan to add affordable housing. I understand and respect individuals concerns about changes ;within their neighborhoods. It is normal to fear change and to see change as a loss. I trust that we as a community along with Beacon will be able to provide the jobs, homes and support that future young residents need to become productive adults in our community and society. This is an opportunity for us to show that we are indeed a community who care about all youth. Respectfully, Laurel Bruno 7244 York Ave So Edina, MN 55435 �,aule,B 1 Heather Braniain From: Lambert, Anna Mae <AnnaMaeLambert@edinarealty.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Teen housing project Dear City Counal Members, Please, please support this wonderful opportunity to help our young "homeless" citizens with housing so they can experience stable, comfortable, home life at a, reasonable cost. These young people are eager to work hard, be responsible citizens, go to school ..... start a new life! We need to give them a chance!!!! Doug & Anna Mae Lambert 1 Heather Branigin From: bettyworkinger @aol.com Sent, Tuesday, August 26,, 2014 4:56 PM To: Edina Mail Subjects 66 West Please vote yes, Jim. The kids who will live there are kids who will have shown that they have goals to make something of their lives. They are not trouble makers - just good kids who need a leg up. thanks, Betty Workinger 1 Heather Braniain From: Jane Dosedel <jdosedel22 @comcastnet> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 7:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West live at 4370 Brookside Ct Edina I support the 66West housing and hope you will. Jane Dosedel 1 Heather Branigin From: DK0777 <dko777 @comcastnet> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:53 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: The Fred Good Morning Mr. Mayor, The golf season is starting to wind down and soon, unless there is a change in the position of City Gov., The Fred will close down. We have had a summer of many comments around our fair city regarding repurposing. You have been a " "lone voice in the wilderness" regarding this issue. You have told everyone to slow down and do this right! Just want to tell you I appreciate your stand on The Fred—Thank You Very Much! Next spring two things will happen: 1. Nine ((9) beautiful "greens" will turn to weeds. 2. The Juniors and Seniors who played there at an affordable fee, will leave the city and play elsewhere. It's sad! Duaine Olson 7601 Edinborough Way #6301 Edina, Mn. 612 - 201 -3487 dko777@comcast.net 1 Heather Branigin From: Helen Wood <hwood.md @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please Support 66 West Apartments My name is Helen Wood. My business address is 6525 Drew Ave South in Edina, I am a member of Edina Community Lutheran Church Youth Housing Task Force, a resident of Edina, and also a former Step by Step Montessori Parent as my child now attends our local Edina neighborhood school. Although the groundswell of community support for.this project is inspiring, the lack of appropriate sites for this project is equally uninspiring. As a member of the ECLC Youth Housing Task Force I would like to the City Council to know that we would have loved to have built this project on a site that the city has zoned for supported housing. As no such zoning exists, we have had to make the best of the current situation and proceed with faith, hope, research, and reason to create this opportunity. The search for this site has taken over a year, and we have considered several alternatives. I believe that we have done our due diligence in site selection and have balanced the interests of our neighbors and community by presenting the best option. Now is the time to move forward. The opportunity cost of not proceeding is too great. As a local business owner, I believe that this project will be an asset to our community — the beautiful building will be an attractive visual presence on 6601 Street. Having residents there will reduce potential for crime as there will be fewer unoccupied office buildings on evenings and weekends. As an Edina resident, I would like to reassure the City Council that the 66 West Apartment Project is congruent with the values of the community of Edina which include providing a strong foundation for youth to achieve their goals. As a former Step by Step Montessori parent, I would like to reassure the City Council that the 66 West Apartment Project is congruent with the values and mission of Montessori schools - providing a solid foundation to young people — cultivating independent thought, empathy for others, social ease, and confidence. Please support the 66 West Apartments Project. It will restore housing and hope for homeless young adults. Edina is a great community and has a lot of resources for.children and families including early childhood education, before and after school programs, wonderful public schools and communities of faith, neighbors, libraries, and parks. Unfortunately there are still young adults who do not have stable housing. While providing affordable housing may be a goal that many can agree on, we cannot afford to outsource this issue any longer. We have the community support, commitment and resources locally to do this now. By adding this resource to our community we will increase the vitality and health of our community and decrease crime as more basic needs are met. Many who grow up in Edina return here to share it with their children. It is my hope that those young adults who benefit from these apartments will consider doing this as well. Helen Wood Edina Business Owner, resident, and parent. Heather Braniain From: Melanie A. Stratmoen <Mela hie' ;Stratmoen @ hen nepin.us> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:36`AM To: Valerie M. Hutchinson Cc: Margo Geffen; Abby Shafer; Catherine M Gold; Kevin D Dockry Subject: 2013 Consolidated'Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Public Comment /Public Hearing Importance: High A draft of the 2013 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report`on suburban Hennepin County housing and community development programs, funded through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is available for. public-comment. Written comments must be submitted by September 12,.2014 to Hennepin County, Housing, Community Works and Transit, 701 4th Avenue South, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55415. The CAPER reports on the Hennepin County Consortium's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) program activities during the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014. CDBG, HOME and -ESG funds are used for housing, community development, and.public service activities that principally benefit low- and moderate- income persons. The 2013 CAPER will be available for review at the information desk at the Hennepin County Libraries (Ridgedale, Southdale and Brooklyn Center). The report is also available by contacting the Hennepin County Housing, Community Works & Traansit Department at 612-348-9260., The CAPER is available on the Hennepin County website at www.hennebin.us /CAPER. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), this material is also available in alternative forms. Please call 612 - 348 -9260 (voice). The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has established a public hearing before the Public Works, Energy and Environment Committee on Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at 1:30 p.m., or as -soon thereafter as practicable, in the Hennepin County Commissioner Board Room (A -2400) at the Hennepin County Government Center, 300 South Sixth Street, in Minneapolis, for the purpose of providing public comment on the overall progress in implementing the goals of the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan for the Hennepin County Consortium. The hearing provides an opportunity for citizens to comment on the overall program performance and the consolidated plan program goals and priorities. Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attomey -client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other -use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Heather Braniain From: Martinez, Gene < martinezgene @arcgreatertwincities.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 27,2014 10:316 AM Y. Subject: RE: Publicity for The Arc Home Visit on Monday October 6 from 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM - 7221 Tara Road, Edina 55439 Attachments: Home . VIsit District 49 Postcard October 2014.pdf; Home Visit Hulbert Release Oct 2014.dooc .. Dear Elected Officials, We hope to see you at the Arc Home Visit on Monday, October 6 from 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM at the home of Alice and John Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, Edina, 55439. If you have questions or have not sent your RSVP, contact Gene Martinez at genemartinez@thearcgtc.org or 952 - 915 -3615. We are looking forward to this gathering on October 6 where issues of concern to the disability community will be discussed. Attached is publicity for the event. Thanks! Gene Gene Martinez Senior Public Policy Advocate The Arc Greater Twin Cities 2446 University Avenue West, Suite 110 St. Paul, MN 55114 952 -915 -3615 (Office) 952- 920 -1480 (Fax) Renemartinez@thearcetc. or$ Achieve with Us.... Ask me howl Explore housing options for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities at Creative Housing: 'Bringing the Pieces Together. This information- packed conference will be on Saturday, Sept. 20, from 8:30 a.m. - 4.p.m. at the Holiday Inn, 2201 Burns Ave., St. Paul. Click Creative Housing Conference to register or get more details. The Arc. u; ems, vjvA Greater Twin Cities WIFE VISIT WITH YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS Achieve Share your story - educate your state and local representatives Monday, October 6, 2014 1 6:30 8:00 p.m. Hosted by Alice & John Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, Edina Minnesota's 2015 legislative session is on the horizon, and our elected officials need to know about the concerns of their constituents with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families. The Arc Greater Twin Cities Invites you to educate representatives from Senate District 49 about issues that matter to you! This Arc Home Visit is an opportunity to tell your story and offer your perspective on' transportation, special . education, Consumer Directed Community Supports, county case management services, Medical Assistance, state budget issues impacting Hennepin County and more. This event is free, but your RSVP is requested. Elected officials invited: Sen. Melisa Franzen, Rep. Ron Erhardt, Rep. Paul Rosenthal, Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Callison, Edina Mayor James Hovland, Edina City Council Members Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson, Edina School Board Members Randy Meyer, Cathy Cella, Regina Neville, Leny Wallen- Friedman, Sarah Patzloff, David Goldstein and Lisa O'Brien, Metropolitan Council Member Steve Elkins and House Candidates Dario Anselmo and Barb Sutter. To register, email peterfricke @thearcgtc.org or call (952) 915 -3631 by Friday, October 3 www.arcgreatertwincities.org Heather Braniain From: Luke Appert <luke.appert @cushwakenm.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 11:41 AM To: Edina Mail; 'swensonannl @gmail.com'; Mary Brindle (Comcast); 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net'; joshsprague @edinarealty.com' Cc: Jon Rausch Subject: 66 West Project. Attachments: SKMBT_C554e14082711450.pdf After speaking with Beacon's staff, we understand. there may be some additional questions regarding the Edina market as well as the site for the 66 West project. Please see the attached letter. We are available to discuss further if you have additional questions or concerns. ; Thank you, Luke Please Visit Our New Team Website www.landmnwi.com Luke Appert Land Brokerage Services 3500 American Blvd W - #200 Minneapolis, MN 55431 P 952 - 893 -8238 C 651 - 315 -6641 F 952- 835 -8849 E Iuke.appertCa)_cushwa ken m.com www.cushwakenm.com WAKEF ELM Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this email. 11�14CUSHMANS I NoRTHMARQ iG,8 ►. WAKEFIELDe To Whom. It May Cont,ern: 3500 American Blvd. W., Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55431 952:831.1000 cushwakenm.com We wanted to suminarize our thoughts as;it relates to the Edina. land market as well. as our efforts to find a site onbehalf of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. We are the land acquisition specialists at Cushman & Wakefield./NorthMarq for the Twin Cities real estate market and have a combined 20 years of experience. We have represented. numerous clients within the City of Edina and we understand theland /development.market well. In June 2013, after Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative had searched for over S.bcmonths, we were hired to assist with site acquisition.. We had. recently analyzed the Edina market for multiple clients in need of land sites within Edina. In addition, we had recently represented a bank in the search.for a new site within the Edina City limits. We were ultimately able to find a land lease for them, at an extremely high price (higher than what Beacon was able to pay). In our opinion; Edina is an expensive market with very little opportunity for most uses. Currently, Numerous Users and Developers are looking for sites within the Edina area and not finding willing Sellers.. Edina, in our opinion,. is one °_of 4 most.difficult and expensive micro.markets within. the Twin. Cities metro. The others are the 494: strips, 394 strip from MPLS to 494, and Minneapolis CBD. (Uptown is also tough and expensive for housing). Finding.Beacon Interfaith a site within budget wasnearly a "miracle" and a task that we did not think possible:at the out -set. Iii our opinion, this is the perfect marriage between Buyer and Seller. Beacon's ability to re -use a ighif cant portion of the existing infrastructure is what makes this development work. It is very clear that this IS NOT a land purchase but a. specialized conversation. We did an in depth market search of Edina whenwe began working with Beacon. After understanding the search criteria and budget, we encouraged Beacon to.look outside the City of Edina due to lack of options within the search area.and.budget. Edina;is a very strong market and one that is not easily penetrated. Beacon Interfaith directed us to not only look_ for vacant development sites and re- development sites .(which.do not exist within budget) but also look for anything within the search parameters hat could be acquired for a conversion. We contacted numerous. existing apartment owners with the hopes of converting the use to affordable housing. We found no willing Sellers, We looked at industrial conversions as well. Land prices.in Edina are at all -time highs today and there is a lack of vacant land opportunities. We are currently representing two market rate developers looking for development opportunities in Edina; but we haven't been able to find any opportunity for them, despite searching for over one year. After, countless calls and analysis, we. were able to locate a vacant .industrial property on Ohms Lane that the owner was potentially willing.to sell. We submitted an offer. and ultimately could not come to terms. In addition, informal conversations with the service provider and City leaders indicated that the industrial area of Edina was not the preferred location for the project. CUSHMAN1 & I N ORTH MARQ 3500 Ametican Blvd. w., Suite 200 WAKEFIELD, Minneapolis MN 55431 952:831.1000 cushwakenin.com We continued to call on properties that were not on the-market. looking for any opportunity, including existing multi - family properties. We located two contiguous commercial properties.on Xerxes that had potential. The combined lot size of the two:-parcels was. just over a half acre (smaller than the TCF site). Selleuexpectation for the sites :exceeded the price of the TCF property: and Beacon could not:utilize <any.of the existing improvements. This was a very common theme. throughout conversation with; .many Edina property owners. In February 2014, we were able to get some traction on the TCF. property.. The property was not being openly marketed for sale but TCF indicated a willingness to sell the site. We had previously toured the property with another Bank client. Given TCPs requested price, the deal would only work:if Beacon could re -use the existing building. After determining that the building could be converted we were able to come to an agreement for the acquisition of the property. . In nearly all real estate transactions you either get value for the existing. improvements or value forVie'land, not both. In this extremely rare transaction, there is value in:both the existing vertical improvements and the land. Both the Buyer and Seller benefit from a strong land value while also; receiving additional value for the existing improvements. In our combined twenty year careers, we haveyet to see a. situation as unique as this transaction. If Beacon were unable to re-use the existing building, the economics of the transaction would not have worked. We can't think of another transaction similar to this situation where an existing. building. is converted into a different use while still. allowing for an expansion. It truly is a win -win scenario and one that Beacon could not duplicate elsewhere in Edina. We continue to: look..-in Edina on behalf of our other clients. If you are aware of any development Ire- development:opportunity please let:us know as, we have willing and eager buyers. We are available: to discuss further if needed. Sincerely, Luke. Appert Cushman & Wakefield/NorthMarq 952.893.8238 luke.appertCcushwakenm.com. Jon Bausch Cushman & .Wakefield/NordiMarq. 951893:8251 ion:rausch(,�cushwaketun:coin Heather Bramain From: Kim Andrews <kim @safechoicesecurity.com> Sent `Wednesday, August 27, 2014 -2:16 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: joni6ennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary-Brindle (Comcast) joshsprague @edinarealty.com; awensonannl @gmeil.com _ Subject: Minnesota's Safest Cities —Edina #16 Attachments: Safest- Cities - Award- Badge- MN.png Good Afternoon!. I just wanted to let you all know that Edina, MN has been selected as the #16 city on our list of Minnesota's Safest Cities! Congratulations! To ensure the accuracy of our rankings, we compared crime statistics (including both property and violent crimes) of over 300 cities in Minnesota to determine our list of the safest cities. Edina, MN should be very proud to have made it to the top of our list! Check out Edina's.listing and the full list of Minnesota's safest cities here: htto:/ /www.safechoicesecuritv.com/bloa /safest- cities- minnesota/ Thank you for helping to provide your residents with a safe and beautiful city to live in. Feel free to show ,off the award and badge (attached) on your website or social media channels to let future and current residents know about the city's high safety ratings! We have included an, easy to embed code at the bottom of the list if you want to show off your award! Thanks, Kim Andrews Community I Relations Coordinator Safe Choice Security 1 w IV z J. t io J _ i F t. 'F� rry Ic O . _ • Heather Branigin From: Edina Student Council <edinastudentcouncil @gmail.com> Sent Wednesday, August 27,2014 2:54 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Homecoming Parade 2014 Hello Mr. Mayor, This is Anna Cerf from Student Council. As you know our homecoming parade is scheduled for Friday, September 12th at 4:30. We would love if you were able to attend. We are asking participants to arrive at the tennis /pool parking lot off ZOth street at 3:45. Per usual, you would have your own convertible! If you have any questions feel free to e-mail me back. Thanks, Anna Cerf Edina Student Council 1 Heather Branigin From: Sarah "Sal' or Tom Hussian < hussianth@comcast. net> Sent: Wednesday, August 27,2014 2:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Support for 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor and fellow City Council members, I am writing to express my support of the zoning approval for the 66 West Apartments. As an Edina resident, a mother of EHS students, and a mental health therapist I feel our community has a great opportunity to serve our homeless youth. The location and easy: access to employment opportunities is a plus. I work with at risk youth and am aware of the issue of homelessness in suburban teens. Living independently is the answer for many and this programwill provide stability. Many of them currently "couch surf' which is unsafe and gets in the way of their goals. Our community is prospering and the 66 West Apartments is a way we can give back! It will show that we are following through with Edina's "affordable housing" goal and encouraging diversity. Thank you, Sarah B. Hussian 5213 Doncaster Way Edina, MN. 55436 Heather Branigin From: Maura Schnorbach <mschnorbach @stpatrick - edina.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Hello Mayor Hovland and City Council members, Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of 66 West Apartments. I urge you to vote, "Yes 1" to the variance to allow the project to be approved. I also urge you to vote, "Yesl" again to approve Beacon Interfaith Ministries to develop the projectl St. Patrick's Office of Social Justice believes this is a, "highest and best" use of the property. It will support the vision created by Edina in its 20/20 plan. We believe that it will:be a community asset and bring value to our community. The Southdale business sector is a vibrant area with an excellent mix of restaurants, retail, and access to mass transportation. It has also developed a reputation for quality professional services from medical to dental and with cutting edge rehabilitation in the medical district. These businesses need committed, reliable employees to continue to be successful! 66 West will have ambitious, entry-level workers who will live nearby. They will want to be a part of our flourishing business community. Why this quadrant ?, Limited available commercial property in Edina dramatically narrowed the scope of the search to approximately 10% of Edina. After an exhaustive search for 18 months, Beacon and Edina Community Lutheran Church found a site with a commercial real estate broker. They presented a proposal and worked with city staff to meet all of the requirements. They have demonstrated a strong commitment to building community support. This is reflected by over 200 individuals that have shown up at the two scheduled City Planning Commission meetings to support the project. This group represents a wide cross section of our community including congregations, business owners and neighbors. Beacon and ECLC have demonstrated a willingness to alleviate concerns about crime, property values, etc. by holding public meetings. I became familiar with the project by attending an Open House that was hosted by Colonial Church of Edina. I was inspired by the passion and commitment of Edina Community Lutheran Church and Beacon. I attended the meeting with two of our Social Justice Commissioners at St. Patrick's. We were all impressed by their beautiful architectural drawings of 66 West, quality construction plans and success with past projects. Beacon has built over 500 units of affordable housing in the Twin Cities. fwas also deeply moved by the stories of hardship that homeless and precariously housed young adults face. It is not only difficult day to day, trying to find a place to stay, but young adults are also vulnerable to violence, sexual assault, and often become victims of crime. This is something I didn't hear about at our last public meeting. Even though several people spoke passionately about, "crime." What I didn't hear about is our concern for these kids, because the truth is if you are 18, you are still young and vulnerable. No one mentioned sex trafficking. This is the number one crime in the world. By all media accounts, it is a billion dollar industry. Young adults who are on the streets without protection or a home, often become used by predators. This criminal activity is not limited to the inner city. When confronted with all of these issues, the natural instinct in a Social Justice Office is to say, "yes" immediately to a project like this. But, as I have shared previously in correspondence to you, we spent six months doing our, "due diligence" by visiting Nicollet Square, meeting with one of the residents, and speaking with members of the staff. After our tour, we enjoyed a delicious lunch at the Butter Bakery. They employ four young people from Nicollet Square. We were impressed with the delicious food, service and great, "vibe "... It is a stylish restaurant in South Minneapolisl I would have never known that they were employing previously homeless young adults if I had not heard about it on our tour! I can say after our tour and lunch, we were more enthusiastic! We knew this is something our parish would be proud to be a part of] We still had lots of questions which Beacon promptly answeredl We invited them to speak at our Social Justice meeting. Our Pastor, Fr. Tim also joined us. They obliged us and spent a couple of hours answering questions. We were all impressed and by consensus voted to support the-project. It was unanimousl In a parish of our size, we also needed to have approval from our Pastor, Fr. Tim. He e nth usiastically'supported it too! Next, we went to Catholic Charities Office of Social Justice to seek their approval to write a letter of endorsement. As you can see there are many steps involved with our process. At every step, we received excellent feedback about the quality projects, diligence in screening tenants, operation of the properties, quality of the programs, etc. As you may be aware, Catholic Charities is one of the most dynamic and engaged, agencies in the Twin Cities on issues related to poverty and affordable housing. When we received their recommendation to move forward, we knew we had another, "green light"... - I can honestly say, that the longer I have been involved with supporting the project, the more I have admired the team of people who is working so hard to build this project. They care about doing it, "right." And, they are doing it for all of the "right" reasons. This doesn't always happen. I think this project represents the best of what we can be as a community. Witnessing so many congregations and Individuals coming together to create something new, and visionary is incredible. I believe that the time is now! I urge you to vote for 66 West! Thank you for your consideration! Best, Maura Schnorbach Social Justice Coordinator Saint Patrick's Catholic Church (952)941 -3164, ext.142 mschnorbach @stpatrick- edina.ore Home address in Edina: 6221 Balder Lane, Edina, MN 55439 2 Heather Braniain From: ultan001 @umn.edu Sent Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Project 66 It is our responsibility as citizens to aid and work for those less privileged and supporting the 66th St. Apartments for the under served homeless and hungry children is a must for our community. Lets join together to increase health and vitality to our community and decrease temptation for crime by offering these folks a decent, clean and healthy place to live and build their lives. Roslye Ultan Edina Resident uftanOO1@.umn.edu 1 J Heather Braniain From: Kay Erickson <kerickson @visi.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please support 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland, I am ,a resident of the western suburbs and support the 66 West project. We fii•st:learned about teen homelessness when my children were in high school and knew kids who were not able to live at home. Other than couch surfing, there was nowhere for them to go in the western,suburbs. There is still nowhere for them to go. The proposed location for 66 West is near transportation and jobs. The project provides ongoing help for young people as they finish schooling and learn to live on their own. The western suburbs are not immune from problems and poverty. There are many reasons kids cannot stay at home. It's time to provide the help they need and get them off the streets and into stable housing so they can have healthy, productive lives. Kay Erickson 27930 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 1 Heather Branigin From: Jen Augustson <jen:augustson @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 201410:35 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: \ Council Members - West 66 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members ' I am excited to attend the hearing on 66 West on September . 2nd. This :Wsuch an important opportunity for Edina. I think it is helpful to consider what the city of Golden Valley' learned in reversing their denial of a treatment facility.for children - http:/ /www.startribune ;com/ opinion /editorials /246431811.html. (copied and pasted below). I know Mayor Shep Harris from graduate school, and I'm 'sure he was trying to do the right thing, but ended up with the wrong outcome and needed to correct course. I'm hoping.Eoina's path, will be less rocky and roundabout. I have visited Beacon's sister facility, Nicollet Square. It is a clean, secure, beautiful apartment building with motivated young adults trying to get their lives started. Unfortunately, there are youth in our community today who do not have a place to call home. But we have the right place at the right time with the right partner — Beacon Interfaith Housing - to address this need. Please support 66 West. Thanks! Jen Augustson 5000 Arden Ave Edina 55424 How Golden Valley officials earned their city its 'black eye' • Article by: ;Editorial Board • Star Tribune • February 20, 2014 - 6:39 PM There were welcome calls at Tuesday's Golden Valley City Council meeting for "facilitative discussion"— including facts and public education about mental illness. The problem is that the council's newfound sensitivity came after. a three- member majority that included Mayor Shep Harris.. effectively ran out of town a developer who had planned to turn an aging building into a day - treatment center for school -aged children. The center would have served those who have a range of mental health disorders such as depression, autism, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or trauma caused by abuse. The developer's proposed tenant: LifeSpan, a respected Minnesota company that already runs centers in Shoreview and Burnsville. At a Feb. 5 meeting, Harris and - Council Members Joanie Clausen and Larry Fonnest voted to deny a conditional -use permit for LifeSpan on a property zoned for mixed -use development, despite a unanimous recommendation for approval by a planning commission. The center would have had kids on site from 8 a.m, to 2 p.m. on weekdays. Had the officials sought out facts instead of swallowing the unvetted information presented by a small, hysterical group of nearby homeowners, they would not have found themselves belatedly scrambling this week to undo an ignominious chapter in the city's otherwise proud history. The council voted unanimously on Tuesday to rescind its previous vote. But the Twin Cities developer already had announced it was looking elsewhere. The hardworking crew at King Pin Transmission would have been happy to help anyone who reached out for information. Owner Curt DeLange has shared a building with LifeSpan's Shoreview facility for years. "There's been no problems with LifeSpan. No problems at all; ".said DeLange, whose father owns the building. He added that the kids are respectful and that there's never been any vandalism of the vehicles parked outside awaiting repairs or pickup. As for the Golden Valley homeowners' contention that the proposed facility was different from the other two because it's close to nearby homes, DeLange laughed and said: "Stick your neck out the door." A sprawling apartment complex is within easy view, and within a five - minute, walk of.the_Shoreview building is a neighborhood of single - family. homes. It's also worth noting that LlfeSpan's Burnsville facility shares a building with a Grand Slam kids' recreation facility and that it's close to a day -care center and the southern. suburb's "Heart of the City" development. Calls to these two cities' law enforcement agencies also.would have, provided, context for city leaders to more accurately assess homeowner's fears that kids "escaping" from the school would do harm. There have been no home invasions by LifeSpan students, according to the agencies. Nor do records indicate that nearby residents or business owners have been threatened or harmed. Nor are police contacts cited. by Golden Valley residents prima facie evidence that someone outside the facilities had been harmed. Law enforcement may have been called 'to LifeSpan when a child needed'to be hospitalized, for example. Homeowners were also frightened by "emotional breakdown' calls attributed to LifeSpan. However, these calls are among the most common requests.law enforcement.agencies get in any community because mental Illness is so common. It's disturbing thatan editorial writer was the one presenting this information this week to Hams, who should been informed before he cast his first vote. In an interview, Harris said City Council members deserved credit for apologizing and rescinding the vote. Harris also fretted about the media giving his city a "black eye." The reality is that Harris and his two colleagues tarnished the city's reputation with their lack of leadership and stunning initial' insensitivity. They didn't scrutinize the information presented by opponents at the Feb. 5 hearing. Worse, they allowed residents to equate children in treatment with criminals. Harris, who was in charge, let a homeowner with the loudest'voice in the room take control of the hearing and carry the day. Other communities in Minnesota have poorly handled proposed treatment facilities. The shameful opposition in Orono in 2010 to an eating- disorder program still raises questions about values in that community. One Golden Valley council supporter pointed out this week that the vote to rescind means his community isn't another Orono. That's not saying much, but rescinding the vote is indeed a worthy step. However, Hams and the council also need to personally make sure the project works. The mayor should quit blaming the controversy on LifeSpan and the Minnesota chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness. Harris, 41, is a first -term mayor with ambition and potential. Assuming responsibility for this situation and straightening it out with sincerity, goodwill and hard work will only enhance his future, not diminish it. ® 2014 Star Tribune Heather Branigin From: Jackie Prince <j.m.prince @earthlink.net> Sent: Thursday, °August 28,2014 8:25'AM' To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcastnet;joshsprague@edinarealty.com Subject: 66 West Dear Mr. Mayor and members of the Edina City Council, I was interested to see the map of the Regional Medical District and hear the discussion at the recent Planning Commission meeting. It appears to me that, despite its Comprehensive Plan designation, this area functions well as a mixed -use area: the Montessori School, the Colony and other senior:housing have been there for decades and every indication is they will remain. As the school has pointed out, they are less than 150 feet from the TCF property: 66 West will hardly be an island. With the approval of the assisted living building on France, the mixed -use character of the area is validated and extended. A development area focused on medical but with other compatible uses is a sustainable design, I believe. 66 West is certainly a compatible use: area businesses, Including the hospital, need dependable workers for entry-level jobs. These young people need the jobs to find their career paths. They will be responsible employees: not only are they coached,''but also they have to pay rent. They will need the proximity to a transportation hub to get to post- secondary educational institutions. I sincerely hope you will see your way clear to approve the necessary changes to the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance to enable 66 West to be built. We as a city will never have a better opportunity nor a better location to build quality affordable housing units. More importantly, this building will allow our homeless young people to become successful Edina citizens. With many thanks for all you do for our.city, Jackie Prince' 7200 York.Ave S. #602 P.S. By far the overriding concern of my neighbors at York Plaza Condominiums is the effect of all the current building on traffic in this area. A project whose residents really will walk and bike and use public transportation will be applauded! 1 k� d 2 7 �) 20 +/-/- l CLSO, rA6L C'v e-s rn l� s � 64t, -6 who r "er cl'k5-1 r ads �. l Now. a[ So ItA G, s -(-D 0',,i �"` oGLn* Z0 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY & COSMETIC INSTITUTE, PA. August 26, 2014 M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN, M.D., FAAD MEDICAL Dnu:cron MELISSA WATERMAN, PA -C DENISE BARNHARDT, PA -C COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY Mayor Hovland & City Council Members City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Re: City Council: Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project Proposal for 3330 West 66th Street Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are writing this letter to reiterate our previously stated opposition to the Beacon Interfaith proposal for a supportive housing project for homeless teens at 3330 West 66th Street in Edina, located in the Edina Regional Medical District. We have previously voiced our significant concerns about the Beacon project on multiple occasions, including letters of opposition, dated May 15, 2014, and July 18, 2014, both attached. Additionally, on August 11, 2014, we provided staff with a petition with more than 150 signatures of patients and customers of Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute and Advanced Skin Therapeutics, expressing opposition to the Beacon supportive housing project. As we have described in detail in the attached letters, we strongly believe that adopting a comprehensive plan amendment to permit a supportive housing project is bad public policy in one of the state's premier medical districts. The proposed changes would erode the significance of the Regional Medical District by allowing the introduction of land uses that are wholly unrelated to the purpose of the district. Approving the project would send a clear message to business owners, property owners, and medical clinics in the Regional Medical District that the City is indifferent to the ongoing viability of the district. This would have an injurious impact on the economic viability of investments in the district and discourage future investment. As our July 18, 2014 letter points out, the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning has already caused us to put on hold an additional $150,000 investment into our property above and beyond more than $2,000,000 we have already invested. The proposed project would also require a significant deviation from off - street parking requirements that would exacerbate an already strained parking situation in the district and negatively impact our business and clinic operations. CHASKA MAIN OFFICE SHAKOPEE 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 6525 BARRIE ROAD - EDINA, MN 55435 1515 ST. FRANCIS AVENUE #250 CHASKA, MN 55318 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PHONE: 952-915-6000 FAX: 952-915-6100 Mayor Hovland & City Council Members August 26, 2014 Page 2 It is apparent that the City is going to greatlengths to help the Beacon project locate in Edina, but we encourage you to not abandon the Edina Regional Medical District and make such incompatible zoning changes. As-au 'alternafive to the proposed location, we ask that the City Council provide direction to City staff to work with Beacon to look at other possible sites for their worthy development. We know that a prominent real estate developer, Tom Nelson, has offered his expertise in assessing several alternative sites and our attorney, Bob Long has offered his lobbying,expertise to assist also. Possible alternative sites should include the City - owned former public works `site which could integrate the proposed project into the development which is being called "Crlandview District." The site presents an opportunity for the City to integrate the proposed project into a mixed -use setting with ample transit. Other possible sites would include the acreage next to Edina Community Lutheran church on 54th Street near the France Ave bus lines, and possibly the State Farm property, on 65th and Xerxes. The introduction of supportive housing to our community is very important and deserves a thoughtful and deliberate analysis, and not the rushed approach that the City has taken to date. We strongly urge you to deny the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning. Sincerely, M.E. Bn en, MD 4CEUO &Medical Director Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA 6525 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 4817 -3340 -9565, v. L J es J. McBride, President' Advanced Skin Therapeutics_ 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 May 15, 2014 Exhibit 2 M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN. M.D.. FAAD MEDICAL DIUMV MEUSSA WATERMAN. PA-C DENISE BARNHARDT. PA -C COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND CosmuiC DmmATOLOGY Mayor Hovland at City Councilmembers- City ofEdina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Strengthening the Edina-RegioniUMedical District Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: We are writing this letter on behalf of the medical office property owners and tenants of the area north of 66th Street West and East of France Avenue "'the City of Edina, known as the Edina Regional Medical District. We are proud to be a part of one of the premier medical office districts in the entire State of Minnesota a4 at and individually, we have spent considerable resources to locate, build, and expand our businesses in this district.. We hope that the City will contlnue to encourage this type of development and protect the inyestments that we have made in the community, and furthei attract new investments to,the Edina Regional Medical District. In light ofthis, we strongly encourage the City to strengthen and.prow the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District and deny any request to rezone the property, loaated'at 3330 66th Street West (formerly TCF Bank), to allow a lowerA=e 1ty multi- family development. Premier Regional Medical Distri The Edina Regional'Medical District is one of the premier medical districts in the state. The City has a history of supporting this district where medical and dental offices and clinics, laboratories, and other health service-related businesses can thrive. The City's commitment has helped to attract a range of health services- related businesses to the area. With every one of these businesses comes a significant investment in. building and staffiug our offices and clinics. We attract an educated, highly -paid workforce, many of whom establish roots in the City and make Edam their home. Our investments have, in turn, attracted further investments into-the district, as other businesses seek to take advantage of the central medical office location, suitable infrastructure, and nearby amenities. We appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the Edina Regional Medical District. OQposed to Comprehensive Plan AmendmgMftzonin „ g If the proposed residential project proceeds, it would require a rezoning of the property and an amendment to change the City's policy set fortis in the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We strongly oppose any change that would erode the zoning integrity of this district, negatively impact ongoing investments CHASKA 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 CHASKA, MN 55318 M#,w OFFICE 6525 SARRIF. ROAD - EDINA, MN 55435 PHoNE, 952 -915 -6000 FAX: 952- 915 -6100 SHAxoPEE 1515 ST. FRANcis AVENUE #250 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY & COSMETIC I, j INSTIT TE, P.A. May 15, 2014 Exhibit 2 M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN. M.D.. FAAD MEDICAL DIUMV MEUSSA WATERMAN. PA-C DENISE BARNHARDT. PA -C COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND CosmuiC DmmATOLOGY Mayor Hovland at City Councilmembers- City ofEdina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Strengthening the Edina-RegioniUMedical District Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: We are writing this letter on behalf of the medical office property owners and tenants of the area north of 66th Street West and East of France Avenue "'the City of Edina, known as the Edina Regional Medical District. We are proud to be a part of one of the premier medical office districts in the entire State of Minnesota a4 at and individually, we have spent considerable resources to locate, build, and expand our businesses in this district.. We hope that the City will contlnue to encourage this type of development and protect the inyestments that we have made in the community, and furthei attract new investments to,the Edina Regional Medical District. In light ofthis, we strongly encourage the City to strengthen and.prow the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District and deny any request to rezone the property, loaated'at 3330 66th Street West (formerly TCF Bank), to allow a lowerA=e 1ty multi- family development. Premier Regional Medical Distri The Edina Regional'Medical District is one of the premier medical districts in the state. The City has a history of supporting this district where medical and dental offices and clinics, laboratories, and other health service-related businesses can thrive. The City's commitment has helped to attract a range of health services- related businesses to the area. With every one of these businesses comes a significant investment in. building and staffiug our offices and clinics. We attract an educated, highly -paid workforce, many of whom establish roots in the City and make Edam their home. Our investments have, in turn, attracted further investments into-the district, as other businesses seek to take advantage of the central medical office location, suitable infrastructure, and nearby amenities. We appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the Edina Regional Medical District. OQposed to Comprehensive Plan AmendmgMftzonin „ g If the proposed residential project proceeds, it would require a rezoning of the property and an amendment to change the City's policy set fortis in the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We strongly oppose any change that would erode the zoning integrity of this district, negatively impact ongoing investments CHASKA 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 CHASKA, MN 55318 M#,w OFFICE 6525 SARRIF. ROAD - EDINA, MN 55435 PHoNE, 952 -915 -6000 FAX: 952- 915 -6100 SHAxoPEE 1515 ST. FRANcis AVENUE #250 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Mayor & Councilmemliers May 15, 2014 Page 2 that we have made in this medical office district, and-discourage future investments from other medical offices that would otherwise locate in the community, If the Comprehensive Plan is amended to allow lower - density multi -family residential uses, such as the proposed housing project, it would permit any type of lower- density multi-family residential development to,occur in the Edina Regional Medical District. In light of the current development pressures, this slippery slope could quickly attract further lower - density multi - family residential development, and eve itually eWninate the significance of the Edina Regional Medical District; thus, discouraging future'growth and investrn' in the area from'the medical industry. . Approval Would Discourage Future lnvestment A rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amapdment to.allow the proposed lower - density multi- fancily development would destabilize and create zoning uncertainty is the Edina Regional Medical, District. The Comprehensive Plan is a jjolicy document that we, as inedlcal office;building owners and tenants, have relied upon to guide and protect the integrity, of the City's vitionfor this medical district Changing the Comprehensive Plan to cater to the pressures of added lower- density multi- family development in the City would'have a chilling effect on future investment in the Edina Regional Medical District. It would send a message that the City has abandoned the vision of making the area a premier medical ,office center, in favor of attracting lower - density multi- family development. The prosperity, of the businesses. in the Edina Regional Medical District requires confidence that encourages growth "and investment, and approving. this development would raise significant concerns and discourage future investment by the medical industry in the district 14ss of Proo ty Tax Base Due to Rezoning As property owners and business taxpayers in the City, we are concerned that any rezoning from commercial to residential districts would erode the tax base and decrease revenues for the City. The inevitable outcome would be that the deficit would fall upon us, the existing taxpayers, to make up the difference. This would be a bad precedent. Other cities have seen the impacts of an eroding tax base and gone to great lc ngths to preserve existing businesses.and business districts, We-feel strongly that the City should proteet,the Edina Regional Medir -0 Center District and any action to rezone a portion of this district would be the beginning of a downwrre'•. trend. Moreover, them are numerous sufficient areas zone as multi- fhmily in the city. that would allow the proposed residential development to proceed without damaging the integrity of the district and the commercial tax base. We encourage the City to work with the developer to find an appropriate location already tuned and guided for such residential development. trimental Parking and- TraftImnacts of P nosed Develonme We also strongly oppose any development that could not meet the requirements of the City's Ordinances. As it is currently proposed, the building would nearly ;double in size and eliminate existing surface parking. Despite the creation of 39 new dwelling'r nits, there would only be 25 surface parking stalls.on site. The proposed parking is not nearly enough'to accommodate the overflow for both the residents and Mayor& Councilmembers May 15, 2014 Page 3 visitors. This will increase traffic and, with no on -stmt parking in die vicinity; it will create conflict with neighboring properties, who maintain parking for customers and employees. We strongly encourage you to strengthen the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District as a premier regional medical destination and decry any request to amend the City's existing policy to allow. lower- density multi-family residential development in the district. We have made 'significant investrneits to establish and build our businesses in this district in reliance on the City's commitment to preserving the area's medical-centric character. Any decision to amend.the City's Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property for residential development would be a reversal of course and put future investment in this district in question. Sincerely, M.E. Bdden, MD CEO & M ical Director Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA 6525 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 Tony Davis, Clinic Administrator Dermatology Specialists, PA 3316 West. 66th Street #200 Edina, MN 55435 952- 920 - 3808 Thomas M. Keane, DDS, Owner Esthesia Oral Surgery Care PA 3400 West 66th Street #270 Edina, MN 55435 952- 920 -3844 Jim McBnde, President' " Advanced Skin Therapeutics 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952 - 915 -6000 McBride Properties 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 915 -6000 Thomas Jetzer, MD, Owner/President Occupational Medicine Consultants 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952 -920 -5663 Carol Jetzer, Owner/President Nikki Potter, Communications Rel. Director Employee Health Assessment Professional Services Chiropractic Health & Wellness Association 3400 W. 66th Street #128 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 Edina, MN 55435 952- 835 -6750 952- 920 -5663 CC: Sen. Melissa Franzen 651- 296 -6238 sen.melisa.franzen@seaate.mn Rep. Paul Rosenthal 651- 296 -7803 rep.pWl.rosentl al@house -mn Rep. Ron Erhardt 651 - 2964363 rep.ron.erhardt@►ause.mn ADVANCED ]DERMATOLOGY & COSMETIC Tce" 1 t r INSTITUTE, P.A. Exhibit 5 M. ELIZABETH BRIDEN, MD.. F.AAD N11:wr:,i. Diuw rtut MFUSSA WATERNIAN, PA-C DENSE BARNIIARDT. PA -C COMPREHFiNM E MEDICAL, SURGICAL ANU COSMETIC DERALITOLOGY July 18, 2014 Planning' Commission Chair Wn Staunton and CommissionVembers Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN ' 55424 Re: Planning Commission Hearing: Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project Proposal for 3330 West 66th Street Dear Chair Staunton and Commission Members: We are filing this letter in opposition to the Beacon Interfaith proposal for a supportive housing project for homeless teens at 3330 West 66th Street in Edina and to request an opportunity to voice our opinion at the July 23 Planning Commission Hearing. We are writing this letter on behalf of several of the medical office property owners and tenants of the area north of 66th Street West and East of France Avenue in the City of Edina, known as the Edina Regional Medical District. We are proud to be a part of one of the premier medical office districts In the entire State of Minnesota and, as a group and individually, we have spent considerable resources-to locate, build, and expand our businesses in this district. We hope that the City will continue to encourage this type of medical office development and protect the investments that we have made in the community, and further attract new investments to the Edina Regional Medical District. In fight of this, we strongly encourage the City to strengthen and protect the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District and deny any request to amend the city's comprehensive plan and rezone the property, located at 3330 West 66th Sheet (formerly TCF Bank), to allow a multi- family supportive housing development Premier Refatonal Medical District The Edina Regional Medical District is one of the premier medical districts in the state. The City has a history of supporting this district when: medical and dental offices and clinics, laboratories, and other health service - related businesses can thrive. The City's commitment has.helped to attract a range of health services- related businesses to the area. With every one of these businesses comes 'a significant investment in building and staffing our offices and clinics. We attract an educated, highly -paid workfonre, many of whom establish mots in the City and make Edina their home. Our investments have, in turn, attracted further investments into the district as other businesses seek to take advantage of the central medical office location, suitable infrastructure, and nearby amenities. We appreciate the opportunity to be a part of the Edina Regional Medical District. CHASKA MAIN OITICE SHARUPEF. 111 HUNDERTMARK ROAD #220 6525 BARRIE RoAn ■ EuiNA, MN 55435 1515 ST. FRANCIs AYENt;L #250 CHASKA, MN 55318 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 Pluove:952- 915.6000 FAxC:952- 915 -6100 Chair and Planning Commission Members July 19, 2014 Page 2 Opposed to s ComQrehe�r iv_e Plan Amendment/Rezoni If the proposed residential project proceeds, it would require a rezoning of the property and an amendment to change the City's policy set forth in the Edina Comprehensive Plan. We strongly oppose any change that would erode the zoning integrity of this district, negatively impact ongoing investments that we have made in this medical office district, and discourage future investments in our properties and other medical offices that would otherwise locate In the community. If the Comprehensive Plan is amended to allow multi - family supportive housing residential uses, such as the proposed housing project, if would permit any type of multi- family supportive housing residential development to occur in the Edna Regional Medical District. In light of the current development pressures, this slippery slope could quickly attract further multi- - family supportive housing residential developments, and eventually eliminate the significance of the Edina Regional Medical District; thus, discouraging future growth and investment In the area from the medical industry. Approval Would Discourage Future Investment A rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow the proposed multi family supportive housing development would destabilize and create zoning uncertainty In the Edina Regional Medical District The Comprehensive Plan is a policy document that we, as medical office building owners and tenants, have relied upon to guide and protect the integrity of the City's vision for this medical district. Changing the Comprehensive Plan to allow exceptions for certain types of multi- family supportive housing developments in the City would have a chilling effect on future investment in the Edina Regional Medical District. It would send a message that the City has abandoned the vision of making the area a premier medical office center, in favor of attracting multifamily supportive housing developments. The prosperity of the businesses in the Edina Regional Medical District requires confidence that encourages growth and Investment, and approving this development would raise significant concerns and discourage future investment by the medical industry in the district. Loss of Property Tax Base Due to Rezoning As property owners and business taxpayers in the City, we are concerned that any rezoning from commercial to low- density or supportive housing residential properties would erode the tax base and decrease revenues for the City. The inevitable outcome would be that the deficit would fall upon us, the existing taxpayers, to make up the difference. This would be a bad precedent. Other cities have seen the impacts of an eroding tax base and gone to great lengths to preserve existing businesses and business districts. We feel strongly that the City should protect the Edina Regional Medical Center District and any action to rezone a portion of this district would be the beginning of a downward trend. Moreover, there are numerous sufficient areas zoned as multi- family in the city that would allow the proposed supportive housing development to proceed without damaging the Integrity of the district and the commercial tax base. We encourage the City to work with the developer to find an appropriate location already zoned and guided for such multifamily residential development. Chair and Planning Commission Members July 19, 2014 Page 3 Detrimental Parking and Traffic impacts of Proposed Development We alsoVrongly oppose any development that would not meet the requirements of the City's Ordinances. As it is currently proposed,.the building would nearly double in size and eliminate eAsting surface parking Despite the creation of 39 new dwelling units, there would onlybe 25 surface parking stalls on site. The proposed parking is not neatly enough to accommodate the overflow for both the residents and visitors: This will increase traffic and, with no on- street parking in the vicinity, it will create conflict with neighboring properties, who maintain parldng for customers and employees. Not a financially Vable.'Cost Effective or Sustainable Prolect We also believe that a $10 million project cost for 39 units of supportive housing, which comes out to $256,410 per unit or $732 per square foot per unit, will make this project unable 4o get financing from traditional private and public sources, and so the project will never-get buifl. The City will have then created a significant new zoning change to allow for a supportive and multi- family housing project that will never be completed. The new zoning,change will then allow any future other supportive or muk6-family lousing project to get built In the Edina Regional Medical District. We strongly encourage you'to strengthen the integrity of the Edina Regional Medical District as a premier regional medical destination and.deny any request to amend the City's comprehensive plan and zoning code to allow multi family supportive housing residential development in the district. We have made significant;investments to establish and build our businesses in this district in reliance on the City's commitment to pneserving the area's medical office character. Any decision to amend the City's - Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property for residential multi - family supportive housing development would be a reversal of course and put future inveibnent'in this district in question:. Sincerely, , M:E. Briden MD CEO & Medical Director Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute PA 6525 Banks Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 815 -6000 Ji cBride, sl er�f A anted Skin Therapeutics 6515 Barrie Road Edina, MN 55435 952 - 915 -6000 Heather Braniain From: Ronald Molony <molony.ron @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:37 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Housing for Homeless"Youth Dear Mayor and City Council, I urge you to APPROVE the proposal to develop affordable housing for homeless teens. Youth are our future, and its our community responsibility to provide options for young people who have no family support. Thank you, Ronald Molony, MD 5605 Johnson Drive Edina 1 Heather Braniain From: Nick Pearce <nickjp6 @gmail.com> Sent: - Thursday, August 28, 20146:47 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague@edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Cary Teague Subject: I SUPPORT 66 West Apartments! Hello - I am writing to indicate my FULL SUPPORT of the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative "66 West. Apartments" project in Edina. I hope you wiU vote in favor of the proposed zoning change on September 2nd. Best Regards and thank you for your dedication to the City of Edina! Nick and Sara Pearce 4367 Thielen Avenue Edina, MN 55436 i H August 28, 2014 To: Dave Fisher, Edina Building Official Please enter this into the public record CC: Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Mayor Hovland Ross Bintner P.E. — Environmental Engineer Council Members: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague Chad Milner —City Engineer Swenson From: Jim & Lori Grotz Brandon Wisner, MCWD 5513 Park Place Edina, Mn 55424 RE: 5509 Park Place — Permit 133045 Dear Dave, We are writing to state our concern that construction planned for the lot adjacent to ours will increase storm water drainage to our property. We have read Ross Bintner's August 5, 2014 report on 5509 Park Place, Permit 133045 and have some concerns and comments. From the Edina Survey /Site Plan Requirements MSBC 1300.0130 Policy SP- 005 -13, Ross found deficiencies or missing items for: • A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed. * Note -We have been told by the Watershed that an application was made but rejected as it was incomplete. • #10.4 Lowest point of entry of'proposed and existing construction (show proposed egress window wells). • #11 Placement and method of :erosion control, including construction entrance location. • #12 Arrows indicating direction of existing and proposed drainage. We have found some additional Policy SP -005 -8 deficiencies that we believe should be properly reviewed during a site visit by an Edina Engineer, who as a licensed Engineer, has the proper expertise to review these issues: • 1. Property lines showing monument locations. — No benchmark shown on: 1. Certificate of Survey Existing 140368 2014 07 29 A JP; 2. Certificate of Survey Proposed 140368 2014 07 26 A JP; 3. Storm Water Management and erosion Control Plan 140368 201407 27 A JP • 6. Locations and dimensions of all EXISTING building /structures on the lot. The following are not shown: 1. Telephone pole in the backyard. 2. Catch Basin /Drain Tile located near SE corner of house. 3. Five buried roof drains tiled to direct water to Park Place. 4. Two Sump Pumps with drains tiled to catch basin or separate drain tile and then to Park'Place. 5. A.second „set of steps in a backyard'storne.retaining wall. 6. A smaller retaining wall in the backyard.is not shown. 7. A four inch lip:on the south property line retaining wall. • 8. Side yard and setback dimensions of building /structures on adjacent lots. —Side yard setback dimensions not shown for adjacent.properties. • 9. Location of all easements as shown on record plats. — None shown. The Torrens certificate and plat as filed with the office of Hennepin County Surveyor for this property shows a utility easement. There is no drainage easement on the 5509 Park Place Torrens property. There is no easement for drainage on Torrens Property at 5513 Park Place. 10. National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD -1929) elevations at the following specific locations: o 10.1 Each lot corner (existing and proposed). — Proposed survey does not show elevations. o 10.2 Grade at the foundation and top of foundation of structures on adjacent lots. —Not shown. o 10.5 Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction. — Lowest of existing is not shown on existing drawing. o 10.6 Top of wall and bottom of wall elevations at regular intervals for all retaining walls. — Elevations not shown. (Also, not all retaining walls are not shown) Storm Water Utility Mr. Bintner writes, "The subject site rear and side yard also drains to subwatershed MHS_11. This drainage path is through private property to the south . and then to Park Place or Dever Dr.” The rear and side yard drainage path for 5509 Park Place is not through private property to the south (5513 Park Place, our property) and then to Park Place or Dever Dr. The statement as to how the property drains needs to be corrected by a revised letter sent to all parties concerned. A visit to the site would have revealed: 1. A catch basin on the SE corner of the home. See attached photo. 2. Drain tile that runs from along the south side of the house behind a block retaining wall that day lights at the western property boundary at Park Place. 3. Three buried roof drains on the east are tiled to the catch basin 4. Two buried roof drains on the north are tiled to drain to Park Place. 5. Sump pump #1 drain (SE part of house); drain was buried and tiled to the catch basin. The PVC sump drain was unearthed when the property owner had vegetation removed to take with her to her new house and the end of the drain is at the catch basin. 6. Sump pump #2 drain (SW corner of house); drains to a buried the which daylights at the western property boundary at Park Place. 7. The roof drain on the SW front corner of the house has a 14.5 foot extension that drains to Park Place. 8. The block retaining wall on the south has a 4" lip that prevents storm water from draining over the wall to our property. 9. The grade between the south block retaining wall and the house is level and the soil is covered with a heavy mill poly and several inches of rock. No water drains to our property. 10. The retaining wall is leaning outward approximately 6 inches towards our property; it will most likely fall down onto our property during house demolition. Property Owner /Builder, Mr. Sullivan claims he is not replacing the wall. 11. South side of home has a gabled roof which doesn't shed water to our property. 12. All 7 downspouts are 3" X 4" 13. The backyard is graded at the south end with a shallow basin to catch and direct water to the catch basin. 14. Even with all the above existing storm water drainage features listed above, after a hard rain, 5509 Park Place will have standing water in the grass for a few days. 5509 Park Place has a wet yard. At this time we don't have impact from the water at the house and yard at 5509 Park Place due to the existing drainage. - During the hard rains this spring and summer, I stood out in the yard and there was not a problem. We don't have drain tile in`our�.basement. We stayed dry. At the July 8`h Neiahborhood pre- demolition meeting, Mr. Sullivan, Owner /Builder, assured us and a neighbor that after construction`was complete no water would come from 5509 Park Place Into our (5513 Park Place)yard. He said he' would not put water into our yard and that Edina would not let him put water into our yard. 9. The 4" service connection to a 6" sump drain-is NOT located on Park Place at the northwest corner of the lot as listed in Mr. Bintner's report. The 4" service connection to the 6" sump drain is located on the SOUTHWEST corner of the lot, 69 inches due east of the small black arrow marked on the curb. The statement by Mr. Bintner in his August 5, 2014.report needs to be corrected and a revised letter sent to all concerned parties. The rear and side yard of 5509 Park Place drain to Park Place and NOT to 5513 Park Place. LiDAR Data: It appears Edina Engineering is using LiDAR data (aerial data used,for creating elevation contours) obtained from Hennepin.County through LOGIS to establish the existing drainage patterns of properties without a site visit to those properties. However, LiDAR data will not reveal conditions /features that will alter drainage patterns, such as catch basins, drain tile, buried roof drains, and buried sump drains. Not all retaining walls will show on LiDAR data. Leaves on trees and other foliage overhanging the structure will deflect the laser and the retaining wall will not show. The aerial data shows contours running through houses. LiDAR data may not accurately reflect the existing elevations and existing drainage patterns. This is why Hennepin County GIS puts a disclaimer on LiDAR data. See below: • "This data (LiDAR) is furnished "AS IS" with no legal representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is NOT SUITABLE for LEGAL, ENGINEERING or SURVEYING purposes." According to the Office of the Hennepin County Surveyor, LiDAR data must be validated. In order to validate the data, a visit to the site is needed to see existing conditions /drainage and to take spot elevations to validate LIDAR elevation contours. It appears Edina Engineering is using un- validated LiDAR to establish existing drainage patterns. We have been told it is not City policy for an Engineer to visit each site to verify existing drainage patterns and to check to see if the existing site conditions as submitted by the Builder are accurate. If existing conditions do not show on the survey, then they never existed. We need an accurate Survey of Existing Site Conditions. Site Storm Water Ordinance Chapter 10, Article 4- Demolition Permits and Building Permits for Single and Two Family Dwelling Units (Sec. 10 -110): The storm water management plan as submitted does NOT detail how storm water will be controlled to prevent damage to the adjacent property at 5513 Park Place. The 5509 Park Place storm water drainage plan shows the water starting-,at the north end of the house, draining to the east, at the NE corner, the water makes a 90 degree turwand drains south down the entire backyard via a narrow swale. At the SE corner, the water makes a second 90 degree turn.and drains west down a narrow path between the retaining wall and:.the 2 egress windows on the south side of the house. (2 egress windows, not shown on survey of'proposed measure 12'X 5'8 ", 5' 4 "X 5'8"). At the SW corner, the water makes a third turn to go to a filtration basin (incorrectly labeled as an INFILTRATION) pond in the front yard. There it is supposed to soak into the ground and drain into a perforated pipe which will then daylight and drain over the curb to Park Place. After a hard rain, who wants water pooling in basin for a few days in their now treeless front yard when the yard already naturally slopes to the curb. Two mature trees will need to be removed from the front yard to create the filtration basin: a hackberry tree with a trunk diameter of approximately 27 inches and a maple tree with a trunk diameter of approximately 47 inches. The backyard is a very narrow grass path, not unlike a runway. There are stacked stone retaining walls along the east, with extensive plantings and two sets of steps leading up the walls. In one area it appears there will be only be approximately 12 feet between the house and the retaining wall. Not far from my property, there will be a large stone patio in the path of the swale. With more impervious surface being moved closer to our property,'we have concerns of increased volumes of water right near our property line. A mature Maple tree, at the south end of the yard, with a trunk diameter of 44 inches will be cut down. A tall privacy hedge of arborvitae will also be removed. I don't believe the storm water will make three 90 degree turns to get to the front yard infiltration basin. The water will most likely not make the second 90 turn at the SE corner of the house, but the water will flow over the stone patio and down into our backyard being towards our NE foundation. Swales fill up from erosion over time. Currently, the water from the backyard and the roof water drain either to a catch basin by the SE corner of the house or to buried and tiled roof drains. The new house has: • No gutters or downspouts • The sump pump location and drain are not shown and we assume it will not be tiled to, the street. The existing house requires 2 sump pumps. • The roof has multiple valleys which will increase rate of flow and volume. • This will be a 2 story house with complicated steep roof lines. • There will be shedding roof lines on the south. • No catch basin and no drain tile • The existing elevation ofthe top of the block retaining wall on the south side of the house is approximately 885. The lip on the retaining wall currently extends 4 inches above grade. The grade between the retaining wall an&the house foundation is basically level (N to S) with a very slight pitch from east;to west. The-grade between the south foundation and the retaining wall will NO LONGER BE LEVEL Dirt will be brought in and the grade at the south foundation will increase by almost 2 feet (from 885 to 886.9) over the existing grade. The grade will drop about 3.9 feet, from an elevation of 886.9 to 883 to the bottom of a small Swale, in a distance of approx. 8.5 feet, creating a 46% grade. In another area it will drop 3.9 feet within approx. 9.5 ft., creating a 41% grade. The grade could be steeper in some areas as there are also 2 egress windows in this area. Currently, approximately 27 inches of foundation is exposed.on the SE and 30 inches is exposed'on the SW. If the Builder increases the grade by 2 feet at the foundation water will drain to our property if the retaining wall is not increased in height. A new retaining wall with elevations and materials as required by code is not shown. A boulder wall would require a larger footprint than a block wall. • With the mature trees gone, there will be more storm water. • The storm water management plan shows water flowing to our backyard. Mr. Sullivan, (the owner and Builder) needs a permanent barrier at the southern property border in the backyard extending to the East property line to stop the water so it does not flow down to our property at the first 90 degree turn (right towards our NE foundation). With two egress windows on the south of the house, there will only be a.narrow lane for above ground drainage, With a 2 foot increase in grade and the resulting steep slope, the retaining wall will not stop water from.coming into our yard. We do not have waterproofing in our basement. Our furnace and water heater are only a few inches from the basements walls. If we have to put in waterproofing, the furnace, the ductwork, and the water heater will have to be moved at an unaffordable cost. The existing contours in the south portion of the backyard do not appear to be accurate. There is a basin, which is not.depicted,in the survey, which holds and directs water to the catch basin. 12. b. No increase in peak rate or volume to private properties on side lot. The City does not require volumetric calculations from the Builder. The Builder has NOT submitted an: accurate survey of existing conditions, an accurate survey of proposed conditions, an accurate storm water drainage plan. No trees are shown on the existing and proposed surveys. We had a drainage Engineer come to the site, and also review the 7/26/14 proposed survey, the 7/29/14 survey of existing and the 7/27/14 storm management plan the Builder submitted. We had considered having volumetric calculations performed, but have been told by the Engineer that the information as submitted is,insufficient and not accurate enough to do the calculations. • Sec. 36 -1257. Drainage, retaining walls and site access. See (a) below. This is the City Drainage Code. (a) .......Surface water runoff shall be properly conveyed into storm sewers, watercourses, ponding areas or other public facilities. Myyard is none of the above. (b) Retaining walls. ALL retaining walls must be shown on a grading plan as part of a building permit application. Plans must demonstrate MATERIALS to be used for the retaining wall construction. - Not Shown. On July 10, Mr. Sullivan came to our home and told Lori that he had contacted the previous owner of 5509 Park Place to get the,locations of the buried tiles from the roof drains. He planned to mark and preserve the buried drain tiles to be re -used. He said, they might have to hand dig around those locations. Lori told him that she had a copy, which he could have, of the Sunde Engineering drainage plan and the catch basin /drain detail that the City required the homeowner to install in 1997. He. wanted the copy and Lori left it for him in the 5509 mail slot on July 14`h. He believed he could re -use the catch basin and drain tile (No catch basin, drain tile,. and buried roof and sump drains are shown on the storm water management and erosion control plan 140368 dated 2014 07 27). A copy of the 1997 Sunde Engineering plan is in the City permit file for 5509 Park Place. We would like: • The City to enforce City/ Minnesota State Building code. Reject the Demolition and Building Permit applications as the Survey /Site Plan Requirements of MCBC 1300.0130 Policy SP -005 -B are incomplete. Surveys cannot be accepted when they are incomplete and inaccurate. • An accurate and complete Survey of Existing Site Conditions as required by MSBC and Edina. If an existing site condition is not shown on the Survey of Existing Site Conditions then it never really existed. • An Accurate and complete Survey of Proposed Site Conditions as required by MSBC and Edina. • After the above plans are re- submitted, we would like volumetric calculations performed by a company independent of the surveying company. • Verify contours in the southern portion of the backyard where they don't appear to be accurate. • A City Engineer to visit the site to see the existing site conditions and to compare them to what was submitted on the Survey of Existing Site Conditions. Take spot elevations to validate the LiDAR data. • Implement the 1997 Sunde drainage plan for 5509 Park Place. The City required the homeowner to implement that plan in 1997. City Manager, Ken Rosland said; The water at 5509 Park Place will go to the street and not to the Grotz property. 1. Gutters 2. Buried and tiled downspouts 3. Catch Basin /Drain Tile 4. Grade backyard to drain'' /: of the water to the North and ' /Z of the water to the South. 5. Extend the retaining wall to the East property line. A durable permanent barrier. We are not opposed to redevelopment in Edina, but we expect the City will not to allow the Builder to take away our property rights. We are trying to address drainage at the beginning so there will not be problems with drainage at the end, when it is difficult and costly to make corrections. Would you please contact us when the revised plans are submitted as we will be having a Civil Drainage Engineer do a review. Please do not issue permits before our Engineer has had the opportunity to review and comment. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance. Jim & Lori Grotz 5513 Park Place Attachments: August 5, 2014 5509 Park Place — Permit 133045 Letter from Ross Bintner to David Fisher with our comments, Sec 36 -1257. Drainage, retaining walls and site access,Policy SP -005 -B with highlighted area and comments. (► _ �•� Y rr :7!91 h�,r�►•� L '♦ t c1 "f J �' IV ` kir a �` t � � / i. � r F • '� �� �_ 'rte.- IV — r n�y, ..; 'i _ •- -..... r ..cam "sll, I R ✓�� r `r, • :� � / � J` / � /� /�, ���ll �; ��• .�/ � tt) /,. I'xJy _ Jj / r / , F` �w•i lilii kj 2014.0$ WT • j' lyf �, r��7r�,�.��, �i3��y�S f r ��K1 ri +�`� at ` 1 1 ,, a f Lx �' �7�19 .,;(L"* r �•1'- :S' 'akY':il.l.•. �r ,L _ / L...9'.a.l;. °,'4.... a%!x' DATE: August 5, 2014 TO: David Fisher — Building Official CC: Chad Milner — City Engineer Permit Applicant FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 5509 Park Place - Permit 133045 The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and adherence to: • Chapter 10, Article 4 — Demolition Permit Stormwater and Erosion Control (10 -106 to 10 -1 13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345) • Chapter 10 Article 17 — Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10 -710) • Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2 — Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 — Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) 1. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: www.minnehahacreek.orF/ 2. Site survey should, follow the standard described in policy SP -005 -B included in the building ep rmit application Racket Survey missing the following: a. #10.4 Lowest point of entry of proposed and existing (show proposed egress window wells) b. #11-12 ESC and drainage can be shown on grading, stormwater management, or erosion control Plan. 3. City Standard Plates available here: http: / /edinamn.gov /index.Rhp ?section= construction standards Street and Curb Cut 4. Application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http: / /edinamn.gov /edinafiiles /files /City Offices /Public Works /CurbCutApplication.pdf 5. Describe removal and restoration of existing driveway and curb cut. The area is within the 5 year moratorium. Sanitary and Water Utilities 6. Show utility connections. See figure below. Storm Water Utility 7. The subject site front yard drains to Park Place and is part of subwatershed MHS —I I. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited. 8. The subject site rear and side yard also drains to subwatershed MHS_1 1. This drainage path is through private property to the south and then to Park Place or Dever Drive. .L. �.� -s— .a-` =- -- — 9. A 4" service connection (Plate 241.310) to a 6" sump drain is available on park place at the northwest l corner of the lot, Connections can be made along the line if needed. ]. ENGINEERING DEPARTmiNi '` `' 'V 7450 Metro Bou;evard . Edina. Minnesota 55439 www.Edina.MN.gov - 952.826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 -'a• ?.* , c _ -v. c., e' i 10. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following links: https://maps.baer.com/edina/ and httR / /edinamn .gov /index.ohp ?section= engineering water resource I I . Required storm water and erosion control precautions are described below. Site Storm Water Ordinance Chapter 10, article 4 - Demolition Permits And Building Permits,For Single And Two Family Dwelling Units (Sec. 10- 110), states: For a building permit, the applicant must submit stormwater and erosion control plans prepared and _ signed by a licensed professional engineer. The plans. must be approved by. the, City - Engineer.and,the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans The stormwater management,,,plan must detaij h6 vl, storawat r waif be.eontrolied to Dr_ e- v- -n-- am4ge to adlacenc. properly and adverse impacts to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wuw.EdinaMN.gov.952 -826 -0371 a Fax 052-826-0.392 public stormwater drainage system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation. Permit holder must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities may result in sediment laden stormwater runoff entering the inlet. The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must be an integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or obstructions. 12. The following comments apply to the storm water management plan: a. Mitigation of increased volume to MHS_1 I. i. Connect underdrain of infiltration feature to 4" sump service. Describe or show extent of facility. b. No increase in peak rate or volume to private properties on side lot. L Recommended to direct offsite concentration of drainage on NW corner of property along the north property line to Park Place. ii. It appears the existing retaining wall along south property line is proposed to be modified to direct drainage. This is not a durable solution. c. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District standards, if applicable. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control following comments apply to the erosion and sediment control plan: t. Describe stockpile locations. �. Provide inlet protection for all storm sewer inlets downstream of the site within one block or as directed by the City. :. Provide sediment control precautions, including downstream perimeter sediment barrier. i. Note I I is blank. T-�vG 4 e-- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 EDINA BUILDING SAFETY POLICYIINFORMATION, - Sunrey /Site Plan Requirements MSBC 1300.0130 wee refvm Inspections Department SP- 005 -82 poUcy mmibu 6 on 1/19/12 I whim numbw 12/4/00 effect- dMe 1 of 1 I page member t. All Building Safety sheets adopted by Firs Department and Inspeetlons Department. 2. Sheet numbers with B suffix developed by Inspections Dept. Sheet numbers with F suffix developed by Fie D Purpose: To provide adequate and accurate site information to all City departments involved in the review and approval of projects, as well as providing information for future reference. Scope: All required surveys L Surveys are required for construction of structures, additions to structures, demolition of structures, moving of structures and grading. Exception: When no grading is to occur on the property, the NGVD -1929 elevation at the existing and proposed main floor level is indicated on the site plan and the bottom of all footings for all structures on the property are above the Flood Fringe, the Building Official, Planning Director and City Engineer may approve a site plan in lieu of a survey when one of the following conditions is met: • The proposed structure is setback at least twice the required setback distance from property lines, and property corners and property lines adjacent to the proposed structure have been located and marked by a surveyor. • The proposed structure is setback at least twice the required setback distance from property lines, and property comer irons or monuments have been located and the entire length of property lines adjacent to the proposed structure have been marked. Surveys for proposed work must be submitted at the time of permit application. In addition, as -built surveys are required to be submitted during the course of construction. 1. An as -built survey indicating the floor level of the existing home at the main entry must be submitted with an application for a demolition permit. 2. An as -built survey indicating the top of foundation and structure setbacks must be submitted prior to foundation backfill approval. 3. An as -built survey indicating actual site conditions including all structures and contours must be submitted prior to final building permit approval. Surveys submitted to the City for permits must include: _ Property lines showing monument locations. Registered surveyor must prepare survey. 2. Scale of drawing. Minimum scale P - 50'. Maximum sheet drawing size 24" x 36 ". 3. Full legal description. 4. Dimensions of lot including square footage and north arrow. 5. Dimensions of front, rear and side yards, proposed and existing. 6. Locations and dimensions of all existing buildings/structures on the lot. 7. Location and dimensions of proposed building/addition/structure, including cantilevers beyond the foundation. Q Side card and setback dirnens ;o�is of buildings/styueture, ate adiacant lots. Q Location of all easements as shown on record plats. Nov, 10. National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD -1929) elevations at the following specific locations: 1 Q Each Idt corner (existing and proposed). /\J0 -r- c.P,v 10r 1 Grade at the foundation and top of foundation of structures on adjacent lots. 10.3. Grade at the foundation, top of foundation, main floor and garage floor of proposed new construction.' 10�0 Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and exisdrif construction. ,} 10(2 Low + -st floor of proposed and existing construction. 100 Trip of wall and bottom of wall elevations at regular intervals for all retaining vtiat;s. � �, � �t�•� ; ,�,.1- y , ,_ � 11. Placement and method of erosion control, including construction entrance location. ��' J.�: •✓ 12. Azov., indic:acin directi.n: of,y::istin6 and proposed drainage. 13. One foot contours indicating existing and proposed grades. - d�--- �.u.. 14. Lot coverage calculations 15. Location of.pylon sign (for commercial project only). 16. Record of revisions, with revision date, number and description. 17. Signature, date and certification of surveyor. I:Ouilding\SafetyPoIidesInform abon\Current}SP005B- Survey- 011912.doc Municode Page 1 of 1 Sec. 36 -1257. Drainage, retaining walls and site access. (a) Drainage. No person shall obstruct or divert the natural flow of runoff so as to harm the public health, safety or general welfare. Surface water runoff shall be properly conveyed into storm sewers, watercourses, ponding areas or other public facilities. As part of the building permit, the applicant must submit a grading and erosion control plan along with a stormwater management plan that is signed by a licensed professional engineer. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater will be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent, property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The plans must be approved by the city engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. (b) Retaining walls. All retaining walls must be shown on a grading plan as part of a building permit application. Plans must demonstrate materials to be used for the retaining wall construction. Retaining walls taller than four feet must meet a three -foot setback. (c) Site access. In an R -1 or R -2 Zoning District, a residential maintenance access of at least three feet in width is required on one side of a single or two dwelling unit from the front yard to the rear yard. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.07(7); Ord. No. 2013 -7, § 2, 8 -5 -2013) Heather Braniain From: Regina Neville < regineville @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:18:AM To: Edina Mail Subject 66 West Apartments for Homeless Teens Dear Edina City Council, Thank you for serving our community and for your consideration of housing for homeless teens. I'm writing to express my support for the proposed apartments at66 -West. There is a need to serve our teens and wahave the ability to offer resources within our own community.. Teens experiencing4crisis should not have to navigate services in Minneapolis, rather, they should be served and supported' in the community they know in order to maintain as much stability as possible in their education and in their lives. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Regina Neville 6113 Arctic Way Edina, MN 55436 1 G0M41 ®'G o� o® ® ®o IV DA'_� S T R E N G T H E N I N G O U R C O M M U N I T Y August 29, 2014 City Council BOARD OF DIRECTORS City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street SAN ASATO Edina, MN 55424 RE: 66 West Apartments BRAD BEARD Dear Council Members: BERNIE BEAVER PETER DAHL We are writing on behalf of the Edina Challenge Team to request your approval of the request by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and Edina Community Lutheran RON ERHARDT Church for supportive housing for youth and young adults at West 66th Street in Edina. SCOT HOUSH The Edina Challenge is an initiative of the Edina Community Foundation that involves collaboration among the following community organizations and grant- makers working JAMES H O V LA N D together to maximize our collective effectiveness in enabling youth in poverty to part icipate in the community, educational, and recreational programs that lead to EVEN McDONALD success in adult life: PAUL MOOTY Connecting With Kids Edina Community Foundation RICHARD OLSON Edina Community Lutheran Church Edina Education Fund Edina GiveAndGo Edina Morningside Rotary Club BRENDA QUAYE Edina Park & Recreation Department Edina Public Schools EPS Community Education Services Edina Resource Center MAMIE SEGALL Oasis for Youth Questscope /One20ne MAXINE WALLIN Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church Southdale YMCA This Edina Challenge Team identified housing as one of the top five priorities for EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR helping Edina youth in need develop to be healthy, productive adults, and it has DICK CROCKETT endorsed this initiative as an important step toward that goal. DEVELOPMENT OFFICER We request your approval of this project and look forward to having the community benefit from the initiative by these organizations to meet the needs of homeless youth MARSHA BUCHOK in our community. Sincerely, G Dick Crockett Mamie Segall Executive Director Edina Challenge Chair 52.80 GRANDVIEW SQUARE , EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 • (952) 833 -9573 • FAX: (952) 833 -9575 edfoundation @ci.edina.mn.us www .edinacommunityfoundation.org 0 Heather Branigin From: LAURA HOPE MELTON <hopemelton @hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 29, 201411:46 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: cgodsall @live.com Subject: Vote for 66 West Dear Members of the City Council, This is to reinforce the message of my letter of July 21st: Please vote in favor of the 66 West supportive housing for homeless youth. Providing young people who are homeless, mostly through no fault of their own, is the humane and fiscally responsible thing to do. The investment we make in helping them become - productive, positive, tax- paying members of the community will pay dividends many times throughout their lives. While.I understand the safety concerns of those living and working within close proximity of 66 West, I believe we can have confidence in the Edina Police Department, working with the 66 West staff and the young people themselves, to maintain a secure environment in the neighborhood that supports all its citizens. Sincerely, L Hope Melton 1 Heather Braniain From: Doris Pagelkopf <dorispagel @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 12:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Vote for housing Dear council, There is no better use of the land on 66th street than housing for youth. The suburbs hawe °as many.homeless youth as the city. Please vote for the future of our youth and civilization by putting 67 West on the site that, provides transportation and jobs. Please back ECIC's plans. Don and Doris Pagelkopf Sent from my iPhone 1 Heather Branigin From: Rena Turnham <turnham @bitstream.net> Sent: Friday, August 29, 20141:31 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: YOU can make 66 West a reality NOW: letter in support of YES vote regarding zoning change Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Swenson, Brindle, Bennett, and Sprague: My name is Rena Turnham, and I am a deacon at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church at 50th and Wooddale in Edina. Although I am not an Edina resident, I am a clergy person serving in the Edina community. As a deacon, I am charged with bringing to light issues of injustice and opportunities for service in the local community and the, world. And, the fight for 66 West has been on my .mind and in my heart for a year now. Since September of 2013, many of u.s at St. Stephen's have been meeting with ECLC and Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative to learn about the issue of youth homelessness and to be invited into the work t.hat they have been doing for over three years. As a result of hearing about the obvious need for affordable youth housing and their,lengthy search for an ideal location to satisfy this need, we have called our congregation into engagement. Upon hearing of the 66 West location right in our own backyard, we sprang into action. am disheartened to learn that a handful of people believe that after three years of discussion, planning, prayer, and engaging professional services and advice, that ECIC and Beacon (a professional affordable housing developer with a proven track record of success) do not have the expertise to find a suitable. location for our youth and young adults facing homelessness. Rather, they feel that they, the, opponents to the project, have that ability and expertise. I find this not only arrogant and insulting but clearly a last ditch effort to delay and to avoid saying what a "no"" vote from you will say: Edina does not care about these young people and city leaders do not, care about Edina's affordable housing agenda. Clearly —the opposition thinks it's an obligation and responsibility of some other community. There will be no other message with a "no" vote, and a delay is really a. "no" vote - -the Way to_ stall the momentum and hope that everyone will get on with something else. z People are watching. Edina's children and youth are watching. St Stephen's is known'for its strong youth program. Our youth. have been informed and engaged. What does it say to, the next generation of Edina leaders that their city leadership could prevent such a. project from moving forward? The legacy we leave these young people will be marked by your decision on Tuesday. Please take the lead in stepping out, and do the right thing and stop hesitating to do what might be I unpopular for the minority, a minority driven by ,misinformation and fear. I respectfully remind you that the city staff and the planning comrn�ission support this project, as do so many Edina' citizens and many congregations that have banded together, as, evidenced by the turnout at the last two planning commission meetings. There is no legitimate reason that has been raised which would prevent you from taking action on September 2nd. This J reject has been p served up on a "silver platter" and all the due diligence has been done (professionally by the way). And making 66 West a reality is the easy way to get on with 3 r the affordable housing agenda that the city appears to drag its feet on. How do we raise our voices and use our authority to help those that can't help themselves - -- for the common good? That's the question 66 West Supporters are asking themselves in the last few days before the city council meeting next week. Isn't that the question you should be asking yourselves? 66 West: The time is now. The place is here, at this location. Please vote "YES" to amend the comprehensive plan and change the zoning for 66 West to become a reality. Respectfully, The Rev. Rena Turnham, Deacon at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church —Edina 4439 50th St W, Edina, MN 55424 612- 308 -1898 4 Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Hovland, Edina Mayor Mike Nelson.< mike.nelson.b4z9 @statefarm.com> Fridoy, August 29, 2014 3:08 PM Edina Mail Re: Beacon Housing Project As a 35 year resident of Edina and also a 35 year business/building owner in Edina I would like to make my feelings known on the Beacon Housing Project proposed for the TCF Building site. I fully support the concept of the Beacon Housing people andwhat they are`attempting to do with homeless young people. The need for supportive, affordable housing for young adults is important and I commend and applaud Beacon's work. However, the TCF property is not at all the right location for this project. As an owner of an office building at 6500 Xerxes I am concerned that the location of the proposed Beacon site makes no sense at all. It appears to me they are asking for some "spot zoning" in an area that has already been defined as a Regional Medical District. In my mind any future building should be consistent with the RMD and have businesses that are compatible to the surrounding.area. As a building owner I am really concerned about the proposed site being "cut out" of a well- planned and thought out comprehensive plan. While there appears to be support from well- intended folks I would guess none of them have much concern for the long range plans of the RMD and the impact it could have in the city for the future..The successful development of this RMD Corridor would have a tremendous impact for the City of Edina. I would urge the Edina City Council to not let the emotions of a bunch of motivated Beacon supporters get in the way of making good decisions that will have a lasting impact on our city. I have lived and operated my business in Edina for over 35 years and I have always.been proud of the fact that our elected officials have made good decisions that have guided the responsible development of many parts of our city. It is my understanding that a couple of "developers have started some preliminary planning for the'combining of many of the parcels that would make sense for a long range successful and well thought out development consistent with the present development taking place around the 65d, and France area. These are exciting times for Edina, and taking this TCF property out of the mix just doesn't make any sense to me at all. It is the responsibility of our elected officials to put aside the populist sentiment and make decisions that are good for all of the businesses and citizens of our city. Finally it appears that the land cost of $2.3 million and the overall project cost of $10 million really makes no economic sense! With the published cost of the project that comes to over $250,000 per unit for the 39 units. There are luxury apartments being built in the city that will come in at less than $150,000 with 4 times the square footage of these units. That -tells me that the Beacon project should be able to get more "bang out of their buck ". To spend that amount of money to benefit that small number of young people seems like a waste of resources. I know there are other parts of Edina that would lend themselves to a project that would make more economic sense and a better use of resources. From my followings it also appears that several Edina businessman who are experienced in the real estate business have offered their help to the Beacon folks to find a more practical and more desirable location. I would urge Bacon's leadership to take advantage of those offerings. I oppose any amending of the Comprehensive Plan to allow this non - conforming use. If you would want an Edina citizen and building owner to address the City Council I would gladly welcome the opportunity. Thanks for your time..... Mike .Nelson State Farm Insurance 6500 Xerxes Ave So, Edina MN 55423 P: (952) 925 -784'1 F: (952) 925 -6172 www.mike.nelson.b4zg(d)statefar-m.com www.mikenelsonaizencv.com tts on Providing protection since 1975• Heather Branigin From: Allison Johnson <AJohnson @beaconinterfaith.org> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 6:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: list of 66 West supporters , Attachments: 66 West Supporters List 8.29.2014.pdf Mayor Hovland, Councilmembers Brindle, Swenson, Sprague and Bennett: The attached document is a list of 360 +individual supporters of the 66 West development. Each has either mailed a postcard to you at City Hall or written a personal e-mail in favor of the project beginning in April of 2014 through this week. All names on this list are consistent with and can be found in the public record of correspondence posted in the minutes,of City Council meetings. Thank you, Allison Johnson Congregational Partnership Organizer Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative I Allison Johnson C ongregalionul Partnership Organizer 1 651. 1-89 6260 ett. 214 1 2610 Unii)ersiti, .4 venrte if'es•t. Suite 100, St. Parrl, XfN 551141 www. beaconinterfaith. orQ 1 Title Dr. Dr. Pastor First Name Richard Sharon Michele Mary Marian Christina Karin Shelby Steve Thomas Karin Paul Judy Margot Mary Sue Jeri William Cindy Julie Bill MJ Michael Bernie Patricia Sara Peggy Joel Patty Sanford Sally Kate Jim Noah Kay Ann MI J P W E B 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014- September 2014 Last Name Aadalen Aadalen Adkins Albing Alexander Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Andress Arnold Astin Augustson Autrey Awes Baker Bale Bauer Beasley Beaver Beaver Belfry Bell Benbow Benbow Berman Bingham Bispala Bizal Bly Bochert Bodensteiner Address 7100 Metro Blvd, #106 7100 Metro Blvd, #106 7430.Xerxes Ave 322043rd Avenue South 8158 Parkview Lane 600 Mission Road 2007 W 61st Street 5105 Danens Drive 4603 Drexel Ave 2007 W 61st Street 6612 Belmore Lane 6612 Belmore Lane 3741 Inglewood 6229 Creek Valley Rd 1832 York Ave N 5000 Arden Ave 7621 Edinborough Way 7209 Shannon Drive 7236 Monardo Ln 5516 Vernon Ave S 7609 Gleason Rd 128 Seventh Ave S 6225 Fox Meadow Ln 6225 Fox Meadow Ln 8035 Belair Lane 5704 Zenith Ave S 6075 Lincoln Drive 6075 Lincoln Drive 4400'Morningside Road 7151 York Ave So 4101 Linden Hills Blvd 9600 Upton Rd 4704 Sunnyside Rd 213 Coventry Ct 5717 Zenith Ave S Address Li City Edina Edina Edina Minneapolis Bloomington Bloomington Minneapolis Edina - Edina - Edina Richfield Hopkins Hopkins Edina Edina Golden Valley Edina Edina Edina Edina Edina Edina Hopkins Edina Edina Eden Prairie Edina #111 Edina #111 Edina Edina Edina Minneapolis Bloomington Edina Edina Edina State MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN Zip Code 55439 55439 55423 55406 55438 55420 55419 55439 55424 55343 55343 55439 55422 55424 55432 55439 55435 55436 55439 55343 55436 55436 55347 55410 . 55436 55436 55416 . 55435 55410 55431 55424 55435 55410 1 66 West Supporters 2 - Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Linda Bofenkamp, 6809 Dovre Drive Edina MN 55436 Kristin Boorsma 5621 York Ave S Edina MN 55410 Karen Boyum 5525 St Johns Edina MN 55424 Pastor Kevin Brown 14335 Garland Ave Apple Valley MN 55124 Ellen Brunker 5016 Sky Line Drive Edina MN 55,436 Laurie Bruno 7244 York Ave , Apt 417 Edina MN 55435 Valerie Burke.. 6317 Limerick Ln -Edina MN 55439 Brian Buxton 9317 Hyland Creek Rd Bloomington MN 55437 John Byom 7332 West Shore Drive Edina MN 55435 Gwen Campbell 6600 Southcrest Dr Edina MN 55435 Katie Campbell 3108 Hampshire Ave S St Louis Park MN 55426 Rynda Carlis 3242 Edmund Boulevard Minneapolis MN 55406 Sonya Carlson Lenzo 7151 York Ave So 508 Edina MN 55435 Diana J Carter 130 Spur Cir Wayzata MN 55391 Mary Casey 6205 Hillside Rd Edina MN 55436 Jim Casper 5713 Dale Ave Edina MN 55436 Glenn Choquette 34 Greenway Gables Minneapolis MN 55403 Cait Clancy 5920 Oxford St Unit #12 Saint Louis Park MN 55416 Susan Clark 5812 W 61st St Edina MN 55436 Marian Clarke 7601 Lyndale Ave So #221 Richfield MN 55423 Pete Cochrane 4611 Arden Avenue Edina MN 55424 Jessica Cook 5408 Glengarry Pkwy . Edina MN 55436. Nathan Coon 4813 Wilford Way Edina MN Richard Cornelius 7224 Glouchester Dr Edina MN 55435 David Couillard 7100 Metro Blvd Edina MN 55439 Michele Cox 5729 Abbott Edina MN 55410 Jim Cox 5729 Abbott Edina MN 55410 Ben Crabtree 5428 Woodcrest Dr Edina MN 55424 Susan Crabtree 5428 Woodcrest Dr Edina MN 55424 George Crolick 6609 Parkwood Road Edina MN 55436 Jane Crouch 11731 Vista Dr Minnetonka MN 55343 Betsy Cruz 8109 Dupont Ave S Bloomington MN 55420 Ted Cushmore 5021 Bruce Avenue Edina MN 55424 Carol Cushmore .5021 Bruce Avenue Edina MN 55424 Betsy Cussler 4502 Sunnyside Rd Edina MN 55424 Marjorie Dahlager 10575 Morgan Ave S Bloomington MN 55431 Richard Dahlager 10575 Morgan Ave S Bloomington MN 55431 2 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Bill Daley.. 7151 York Ave So Edina MN 55435 Bernadette Daly 4521 Sedum Lane Edina MN 55435 Sarah Danielson 4014 Lynn Ave Edina MN 55416 Marilyn Ann David 8549 Irwin Road Apt 338 Bloomington. MN 55437 Bill Davis 6616 Cornelia Dr. Edina MN 55435 Meredith Davis 6616 Cornelia Dr. Edina MN 55435 William Davis 6616 Cornelia Dr. Edina MN 55435 Dorothy DeFreese 6711 Lake Shore Drive 415 Richfield MN 55423 Mark Dierauer 6072 Whited Ave Minnetonka MN 55345 Nancy Dobbins 7809 W. 101st Street Bloomington MN 55438 Jane Dosedel 4370 Brookside Ct #303 Edina MN 55436 Patrick Downey 7501 Hyde Park Drive Edina MN 55439 Al Dungan 7100 Metro. Blvd Apt 306 Edina MN 55439 Donna Eder 6045 Lyndale Ave S 128 Minneapolis MN 55419 DeeDee Edlund 6528 Girard Ave S Richfield MN 55423 Larry Edlund 6528 Girard Ave S Richfield MN 55423 George Edmonson 6621 Iroquois Trail Edina MN 55439 Scott Edmundson 5241 Meadow Ridge Edina MN 55439 Lana Edmundson 5241 Meadow Ridge Edina MN 55439 Pacy Erck 6315 Colony Way Edina MN 55435 Marilyn Erickson 4401 110th St W Bloomington MN 55437 Jennifer Esser 4014 Lynn Ave Edina MN 55416 Adam Estrem 4439 W. 50th Street Edina Edina MN 55424 Ted Estrem 6300 Colonial Way #327 Edina MN 55436 Vicki Estrem 4204 Branson St Edina MN 55424 Jeanne Exline 6711 Lake Shore Drive 4702 Richfield MN 55423 Jack Exline 6711 Lake Shore Drive #702 Richfield MN 55423 Colleen Feige 6616 Field Way. Edina MN 55436 Susan Fischer 11000 France Ave S Bloomington MN 55432 Dan Fjellman .. 7151 York Ave So Edina MN 55435 Colleen Foley 10901 Xerxes Ave S Bloomingon MN 55431 Kathleen Foster 211 Coventry Court Edina MN 55435 Sandy Fox Mabel Frankenstein 8341 Lyndale Ave So 406 Bloomington MN 55420 Sen. Melisa Franzen 306 Capitol Saint Paul MN 55155 Josh Freeman 3530 Harriet Ave Minneapolis MN 55408 Carol Frisch 8301 Creekside Cir Apt 640 Bloomington MN 55437 3. 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Kristina Fruge St. Louis Park MN Deb Gensmer 1618 Park Road Edina MN 55425 Rebecca Gibson Ray Giske 5812 Jeff P1 Edina MN 55436 Kathy Glur 6840 Garfield Ave So Richfield MN 55423 Cathleen Godsall 5601 Johnson Dr, Edina MN 55436 Dr. Ward Godsall 5601 Johnson Dr. Edina MN 55436 Gay Gonnerman 1516 Essex Rd Minnetonka MN 55305 Nancy Gooch 5998 Chasewood Pkwy #204 Minnetonka MN 55343 Mary Gorilla 2214 Cleveland St. NE Minneapolis MN 55418 Ruth Gough 6941 Hillcrest Lane Edina MN 55435 Joanne Green 7500 York Ave So Edina MN 55435 Katie Grooms 1588 Eustis St Apt 309 Lauderdale MN 55108 Norm Groth 7500 York Ave So 601 Edina MN 55435 Helen Groth 7500 York Ave So 601 Edina MN 55435 Kathryn Hagen 4603 Drexel Ave Edina MN- 55424 Sharon Hall 401 E Burnsville Pkwy Apt 329 Burnsville MN 55337 Kristina Halvorsen 6333 Miller's Lane Edina MN 55424 Joan Hanson 7340 York Ave So Edina MN Katie Hardy 7510 Cahill Road Edina MN 55439 Paulette Hastings P.O. Box 24141 Edina MN 55424 Christine Haugen 5408 Girard Ave South Minneapolis MN 55419 Richard Hay 6820 Auto Club Road Bloomington MN 55438 Diane Helgeson 13018 Falcons Way Savage MN 55378 Marcia Henningson 232 Morgan Ave S Minneapolis MN 55405 David Hillestad 12501 Portland #215 Burnsville MN 55337 Robert Hobbins 4708 Upper Terrace Edina MN 55435 Judy Hoffman 3841 Inglewood Ave S Saint Louis Park MN 55416 Nina Holiday -Lynch 4360 Brookside Ct Apt 201 Edina MN 55436 Tom Holm 4501 Heritage Hills Dr Bloomington MN John Howard 5812 W 61st St. Edina MN 55436 Sheri Huppert 5600 Bernard Place Edina MN 55436 Paulette Hutton 6316 Halifax Ave S Edina MN 55424 Matt Iverson 9001 Harrow Way Eden Prairie MN 55347 Molly Jacobson 2786 Xerxes Ave S Minneapolis MN 55416 Jennifer Janovy 4016 Inglewood Ave Edina MN Harold Jastrom 6392 Sequoia Circle Eden Prairie MN 4 Rev. Pastor Dr. Lynn Sara Wayne William Brian Michael Nancy Sally Genevieve Ann Daniel Margaret Suzanne Lauren Ann Lydia Steve Andrea Sally Larry Claire Tom Nora Steve Susan Ruth Mary Ken Edward Eric Christina Geralyn James Nora Barbara Don Chuck R R P. 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Johnson Johnson Johnson Johnson Jones Jordan Jorgenson Kamps Katkov Keenan Kelley Kersteter Kerwin Kewley Kiever Kihm Kirchner Knoll Knutson Koch Kolmodin Kvaale Lagaard Lagaard Lampe Lancaster Lantto Larkin Larson Leenders LeMon Lindekugel Lund Luskin Luther Lutz 6000 Fairfax Ave 4815 Thomas Ave South 9348 Russell Ave S 14174 Westridge Dr 6200 Colonial Way 3605 west 54th street 7151 York Ave So 4009 48th St W 6115 Lincoln Drive 7209 Schey Dr. 421717th Ave S 4613 West 62nd Street 5238 Hollywood Rd 4501 Park Glen Road Apt 139 7151 York Ave So 5657 Pompano Dr 8983 Mariabo Circle 4601 Arden Avenue 719 3 51st Street 1516 Essex Rd 16290 North Hillcrest Court 4500 Nancy Ln. 6941 Newton Ave S 6941 Newton Ave S 317 Groveland Ave 6224 Knoll Dr 5000 William Ave 9602 Utica Road 7301 West Shore Drive 6600 Limerick Drive 7151 York Ave So 16441 Norwood Dr. 5325 W 61st St 4328 W 58th Street 5708 Harriet Ave 6022 Oliver Ave S Edina _Minneapolis Bloomington Eden Prairie Edina Edina Edina Edina 343 Edina Edina Minneapolis Edina Edina Saint Louis Park Edina Minnetonka Bloomington Edina Minneapolis Minnetonka Eden Prairie Edina Richfield Richfield Apt 503 Minneapolis Edina Edina Bloomington Edina Edina Edina Minnetonka Edina Edina Minneapolis Minneapolis MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN 55424 55410 55431 55347 55436 55410 55435 55424 55436 55439 55407 55424 55436 55416 55435 55343 55438 55424 55417 55305 55346, 55424 55423 55423 55403 55436 55436 55437 -55435 55439 55435 55345 55436 55424 55419 55419 5 Pastor Rev Camilla Catherine Elgin Sally Mike Meg Gretchen Jeanne Nancy Jan Anne Chas Fei Pat Debby Adele Laura Hope Dawn Kathryn Don Roxann Marilyn Tom Joanna Kim Lauren Jeannie Anne Maureen Barb Shannon Betsy Larissa Hilary Win Christie Kris P G. 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014- September 2014 Madson Malotky Manhard Manhard Manhard Mannix Marble Mastain Matson Mattox Mavity McKhann McKhann McNamara McNeil Mehta Melton Menzel Mertz Mertz Metz Miller Miller Mitchell Montgomery Morse -Wendt Mory Murray Nalezny Neal Neale Nelson Nelson Nelson Neuger Neuger Newcomer 4404 Philbrook Lane 5901 Rowland Rd 5529 Village Drive 5529 Village Drive 6709 Normandale 4511 Arden Avenue 1313 Boyce Street 8034 Autumn Ridge Way 5529 Warden Ave 7114 Knox Ave S 3812 Glenhurst Ave S 5717 Vernon Ave So 5717 Vernon Ave S 5601 Dewey Hill Rd 5501 Benton Avenue 4917 W. Old Shakopee Rd 48,25 Valley View Rd 5912 Chowen Avenue South 5513 Kellogg Ave 5513 Kellogg Ave_ 5537 Upton Ave S 4400. Washburn Ave S 5000 France Ave S. 6424 Mendelssohn Ln 5300 Evanswood Lane 4113 West 54th Street 5616 Elliot Ave So 6621 Iroquois Trail 5812 Kellogg Ave 7917 Wyoming Ct 4623 Drexel Ave 4717 W. 60th St. . 9063 Cold Stream Lane 7508 W 104th Street 301 Kenwood Pkwy 301 Kenwood Pkwy Edina Minnetonka Edina Edina Edina Edina Hopkins Chanhassen Edina Richfield Saint Louis Park Edina Edina Apt 206 Edina Edina Bloomington Edina Edina Edina Edina Minneapolis Mpls 36 Edina Edina Edina Edina Minneapolis Edina Edina Bloomington Edina Edina Eden Prairie Bloomington Minneapolis Minneapolis Hopkins MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN Mn MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN 55424 55343 55439 55439 55439 55424 55317 55423 55416 55436 55436 55439 55436 55424 55410 55424 55424 55410 55410 55410 55343 55436 55424 55417 55439 55424 55438 55424 55424 55403 55403 6 55416 55416 55410 55410 55401 55424 55345 55345 55424 55424 55416 55416 55424 55410 55416 55378 55436 55424 55423 55416 55436 55416 55436 55436 55424 55439 55435 553444 55424 55424 55436 55424 55114 7 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014- September 2014 Rev. Larry Nielsen 24 Maddaus Ln Golden Valley MN Rev. Mary Ellen Nielsen 24 Maddaus Ln Golden Valley MN Pattiann Nordgren 5813 France Ave So Edina MN Patricia Norton 4856 Washburn Ave So Minneapolis MN Elizabeth Novotny 400 North 1st Street #604 Minneapolis MN Erica Nowak 6009 Halifax Ave Edina MN Arlene Nystuen 6008 Wyngate Lane- ; Minnetonka MN Jerry Nystuen 6008 Wyngate Lane. Minnetonka MN Steve Obaid 4404 Philbrook Lane Minneapolis MN Karin Obaid 4404 Philbrook Lane Edina MN Mark Olmon 5508 Concord Ave Edina MN James Olson 3917 Lynn Ave S Saint Louis Park MN Lois Olson 3917 Lynn Ave S Saint Louis Park MN Laurie Olson 4700 Sunnyside Road Edina MN Rhonda Olson 5109 Beard Ave So Minneapolis MM Sandy Oren 5925 Beard Ave Edina MN Bridget Orlopp 5250 Xerxes Ave So Minneapolis MN Dean Osterman 13018 Falcons Way Savage MN David Ostlund 5517 Highwood Drive Edina MN Andy Otness 5433 Kellogg Ave Edina MN Sandra Overland 722513th Avenue South Richfield MN Ashlyn Owens Grynol 2813 Xenwood Ave. S Saint Louis Park MN Joan Parsons 7 Wellesley PI Edina MN Marion Paulson 3663 Park Center Blvd St. Louis Park MN Nick Pearce 4376 Thielen Ave Edina MN Sara Pearce 4376 Thielen Ave Edina MN Matt Pearson 4009 W. 62nd Street Edina MN David Peterson 6204 Loch Moor Dr Edina MN Dory Peterson 4120 Parklawn Ave Edina MN Gerry Peterson 8811 Basswood Rd Eden Prairie MN Nancy Peterson 5945 St. John's Edina MN Dory Peterson 41,.20 Parklawn Ave 127 Edina MN John C Peterson 5945 St. John's . Edina MN Ruth M Phelps 5827 W. Lake Street St Louis Park MN Gretchen Pinsonnault - 6859 Langford Drive Edina MN Jill Plumb Smith 4634 Casco Ave Edina MN Kim Pomroy 200 Kenwood Dr E Maplewood MN 55416 55416 55410 55410 55401 55424 55345 55345 55424 55424 55416 55416 55424 55410 55416 55378 55436 55424 55423 55416 55436 55416 55436 55436 55424 55439 55435 553444 55424 55424 55436 55424 55114 7 Pastor Suzanne Nancy Mary Lee Vicki Jackie Joseph Rachel Linda Steve Mary Jay Don Sonja Warren Kathy .Nate Carol Erik Wendell Robbyn Ruth Blair John Katie Maura Judy Maxene Jim Sara Belle Judy Judith Sue Lonni Briana Lawrence Iris furl 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Pope Potter Pratt Primuth Prince Ragan Reeves Richardson Richardson Rodgers Rudi Rudrud Salveson Salveson Saterbak Saunders Scheel Scheurle Schiell Schiell Schiell Schipper Schlobohm Schneider -Bryan Schnorbach Schuck Schwanke Schwarz Schwiebert Scott Semsch Semsch Shulze Skrentner Smith Smith Smith 6621 Mohawk Trail 5025 60th St W 4500 Nancy Ln. 18679 Heathcote Dr 7200 York Ave S 7367 Longview Circle 5515 Hansen Road 5929 Halifax Ave S 5929 Halifax Ave S 4360 Brookside Ct 5124 Hankerson Ave 1201 Yale P1 3123 West 47th Street 3123 West 47th Street 6051 Laurel Avenue 3 Spur Road 7209 Morgan Ave S 2007 W 61st St 6711 Lake Shore Drive 6711 Lake Shore Drive 6711 Lake Shore Drive 5624 Beard Ave South Nine Mille Village 5730 Grove St 6221 Balder Ln 395 Lake St W 2929 Chicago Avenue 6300 Colonial West 5909 Beard Ave S 1376 Minnehaha Pkwy 8056 Pennsylvania Rd 8056 Pennsylvania Rd 6800 Paiute Dr 1490 Dekalb Ave 14826 Blakeney Road 8577 Thomas Ave So Edina Edina Edina Wayzata Apt 602 Edina Chanhassen Edina Edina Edina #317 Edina Edina #310 Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Apt 110 Golden Valley Edina Richfield Minneapolis 307 Richfield 307 Richfield 307 Richfield Edina Edina Edina Edina Wayzata 1213 Minneapolis #315 Edina Edina Minneapolis Bloomington Bloomington Edina Edina Brooklyn Eden Prairie Bloomington MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN, MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN NY MN MN 55439 55436 55424 55391 55435 55317 55436 55424 -1942 . 55424 -1942 55436 55410 55403 55410 55410 55416 55436 55419 55423 55423 55423 55410 55436 55436 55439 55391 55407 55436 55410 55419 55438 55438 55439 11237 55347 55413 8 ' 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Molly Snuggerud 1900 W Old Shakopee Rd Bloomington MN 55431 Mary Jane Steinhagen 6600 Pleasant Ave #224 Richfield MN 55423 Michele Steinke 4825 Rutledge Ave Edina MN 55436 Bonnie Sternme 7109 2nd Ave So Richfield MN 55423 George Stenehjem 7656 Woodview Court - Edina MN 55439 Hannah Stephan 5100 Danens Drive Edina MN 55439 Susan Stephan 5100 Danens Drive Edina MN 55439 Amy Stetzel 4.316 Upton'Avenue South Apt 302 Minneapolis MN 55410 Leslie Stiles 6901 Auto Club Road Bloomington MN 55438 Cherie F Stofer 4604 Golf Ter Edina MN 55424 Pastor Erik Strand 5732 Abbott Ave South Edina MN 55410 Libby Strittmater 6100 Chowen Ave So Edina MN 55410, Elli Strittmater 6100 Chowen Ave So Edina MN 55410 Brian Strittmater 6100 Chowen Ave So Edina MN 55410 John Strom ..5005 Arden Ave Edina MN 55424 -1315 Nancy Strom 5005 Arden Ave Edina MN 55424 -1315 - Jackie Sullivan 6832-Gleason Road Edina MN 55439 Sharon Sullivan 7100 Metro Blvd Edina MN 55439 David Sumnicht 6620 Logan Ave S Richfield MN 55423 Eileen A Supple -Byom 7332 West Shore Drive Edina MN 55435 Leslie Swiggum 7234 Ticonderoga_ Tr. Eden Prairie MN 55346 Mark Swiggum 7234 Ticonderoga Tr Eden Prairie MN 55346 n. Lisa Taylor 18326 Cattail Court Eden Prairie MN 55346 Gertie Taylor 7151 York Ave So Edina MN 55435 Lisa Thompson 5500 Benton Ave Edina MN 55436 Mary Tomback 2061 Utah Avenue S Saint Louis Park MN 55426 Karen Treat 500 Blake Rd Edina MN 55343 Lynn Truesdell 9 Woodland Road Edina MN 55424 Carol B. Truesdell 9 Woodland Road Edina MN 55424 Barb Turner 6805 Normandale Rd Edina MN 55435 Rev. Rena Turnham 4439 W. 50th Street Edina Edina MN 55424 Chuck Tyler 7100 Metro Blvd Edina MN 55439 Mary Tyler 7100 Metro Blvd Edina MN 55439 Dan Tysver 2104 53rd St West Minneapolis MN 55419 Pastor Jason Van Hunnik . 9001 Cedar., Lake Rd Saint Louis Park MN 55426 -2398 Judy Van Osdel 6444 Wilryan,Ave. Edina MN 55439 Karen Vevle 8662 Ridgewind Road Eden Prairie MN 55344 i _ 9 55436 55391 55437 55435 55438 55426 55436 55409 55.438 55439 55435 55435 55436 55436 55438 55419 55305 55436 55436 55416 55424 55424 55446 55446 55410 55436 55436 55436 55105 10 66 West Supporters Submitted to Edina City Council for public record during April 2014 - September 2014 Louise Waddick 5304 Blake Rd Edina MN Judy A. Waeschle 2836 Mayfield,Road Wayzata MN Lisa Walker 10 Maple HilLRoad Hopkins MN Ruth Ward -Gross 5601 Auto Club Rd Bloomington MN Barbara Waterston 6566 France Ave #1203 Edina MN Beryl Weidenbach 7801 W. 99th Street Bloomington MN Julie Weig 2581 Quebec Avenue S, Saint Louis Park MN Mary Werbalowsky 6000 Fox Meadow Lane Edina MN Gwen Westberg 3923 1st Ave South Minneapolis MN Eleanor Westerberg 7103 W 84th Street Bloomington MN Ardis Wexler 7520 Cahill Rd #119 Edina MN Ging Wiandt 4404 Gifford Drive Edina MN Matthew Wiandt 4404 Gilford Drive Edina MN Betty Ann Wiens 4929 Green Farms Circle Edina MN Cornie Wiens 4929 Green Farms Circle Edina MN Anne Williamson 7913 Wyoming Ct Bloomington MN Jill Williamson 5835 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis MN Caitlyn Winchell 13012 Muriel Rd. Minnetonka MN Helen Wood 5253 Lochloy Drive Edina MN Jeff Wood 5253 LochloyDrive Edina MN Linda Woodstrom 4109 Morningside Rd Edina MN Elizabeth Workinger 5224 Kellogg Ave S Edina . MN Geof Workinger 5224 Kellogg Ave S Edina MN Peggy Yackel 17710 38th Avenue North Minneapolis MN Peter Yackel 17710 38th Avenue N Minneapolis MN Mary Yee 5009 Beard Ave S . Minneapolis MN Carolyn Young _ 5275 Grandview Square, Apt. 3210 Edina MN Dick Young 5275 Grandview Square, Apt 3210 .Edina MN Katherine Youngblood 5275 Grandview Square Apt 3312 Edina MN Karen Zeleznak .1140 James Avenue I Saint Paul MN 55436 55391 55437 55435 55438 55426 55436 55409 55.438 55439 55435 55435 55436 55436 55438 55419 55305 55436 55436 55416 55424 55424 55446 55446 55410 55436 55436 55436 55105 10 Heather Branigin From: sullivan6832 <su1livan6832 @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, August 3Q 2014 8:09 AM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); Sprague, Josh; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; jonibennettl26comcast.net Subject: Support for 66 West Apartments I urge you to vote YES on the resolutions before you at the September 2 meeting and allow this much - needed proposed housing development to proceed. 66 West Apartments meets many Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives, including promotion of an inclusive community and promotion of lifecycle housing to support a range of housing needs that meet people's preferences and needs at all stages of life. This site meets the needs of the young adults who would live there; they deserve the opportunity to thrive in a welcoming Edina community. If not here, where ?. Jackie Sullivan 6832 Gleason Road, Edina Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone 1 Heather Branigin From: Erik Scheurle <gma343 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 3:30 PM To: Edina..Mail Subject: 66 West Good Day Mayor Hovland; just a quick note to urge your support for 66 West. This apartment building will serve a highest and best use for Edina - for the tenants, for the businesses in the area, and for the long -term growth of the community. Comprehensive plans and zoning regulations are valuable guides for development, growth and change. They rare not hard and fast permanent commandments, and we expect flexibility to meet new opportunities. A change to the comprehensive plan and zoning is certainly appropriate for 66 West, and beneficial for Edina. You are well aware that we already have 250 to 300 youth who are homeless or precariously housed In our southwest suburbs. These are our; children. Most of us had a solid support system as we learned how to be independent adults. Some of us are not so fortunate. These young people are our future, and we should act to give them the stable support they need. We should act to provide the secure, safe environment that will help them make the transition to independence. We will build a building to transform lives, and that is certainly a highest and best use that the city should encourage. Please support a change to the comprehensive plan and zoning so we can build 66 West. Thank You. Erik Scheurle, member of the Housing Task Force at Edina Community Lutheran Church and Beacon Citizen Erik Scheurle gma343@g mail .corn cell 612 202 -3046 I help people take control of their financial future. 1 r: Heather Braniain From: Dean Goldberg <dgoldberg620 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 4:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: ' Vote for 66 West Mayor Hovland: I am sending this email to ask that you please vote in favor of the 66 West supportive housing for homeless oa` I am not a resident of Edina but I care very much about and thus am intimately involved in addressing the problem of homelessness in Minnesota, particularly in youth. I Chair the Temple Israel Committee to End Homelessness, I am on the planning committee for the Downtown Congregations to End Homelessness Unite to End Homelessness event on October 12, 2015, and I volunteer 1 -2 days a week at The Bridge for Youth which is a youth crisis/emergency shelter in Minneapolis. The message I want to send you is that providing young people who are homeless, mostly through no,fault of their own, is without a doubt, the most humane'and fiscally responsible thing to do. The investment we make in helping those youth become productive, positive, tax- paying members of the community will pay dividends many times throughout their lives. I appreciate the concerns of those living and working within close proximity of 66 West, but I think it's important to understandthe potential residents of 66West are not criminals. The good people of Edina should understand that these are young adults with dreams, aspirations, and goals similar to the residents of the ;community around 66 West. The affordable housing at 66 West can help them secure those dreams. f remain hopeful that the Edina City Council can find it in their hearts to do the humane thing by amending the comprehensive plan and changing the zoning to allow 66 West to become a reality. Sincerely, Dean Goldberg 13 Indian Hills Drive. Circle Pines, MN 55014 Dean Goldberg, Pharm.D. Cell: 763- 234 -1180 .email: d og ldber 620 ,gmail.com Heather Braniain From: Jeff Wood <jeffswood @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 8:20 PM Subject: 66 West Apartments Please support the 66'West Apartments Project. My name is Jeff Wood and myself and members of my family have lived in Edina since 1976. 1 have never seen such a passionate group as the Edina Community Lutheran Church Youth Housing Task Force: They have. been working on finding a location for housing for at need youth for over three years. Please vote yes to amend the comprehensive plan and change the zoning for 66 West so this dream can become a reality. It will restore housing and hope for homeless young adults. While providing affordable housing may be a =goal that many can agree on, we cannot afford'to outsource this issue any longer. We have the community support, commitment and resources locally to do this now. By adding this resource to'our community we will increase the .vitality and health of our community and decrease crime as more basic needs are met. Many, such as myself, who grew up in Edina have returned here to share this wonderful community with their children. Creating safe and affordable housing will help foster future generations of Edina citizens. Thank you, Jeff Wood Heather Branigin From: Paula Schwartz <plschwartz @msn.com> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:47 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: thomas schwartz Subject: Beacon Housing Project September 1, 2014 RE: Beacon Housing Project Edina Dear Mayor Hovland; As owners of the property at 6444 Xerxes Ave South in Edina, Audiology Concepts, we would like to express our concerns regarding the proposed Beacon Housing Project at the TCF bank location on 66th street. We are familiar with the Beacon Interfaith Housing project in other areas of the city and support and believe in it's importance, need and incredible success. We do not have concern, as others do, of the safety concerns due to the homeless background of the young people who would be tenants. We do, however, strongly question and oppose the location of the proposed project. The decision of the proposed location smack dab in the middle of a current and future medical corridor in Edina makes no logical sense. We purchased our building in 2008 and rezoned the property from residential to commercial. Our long term vision and hope is to eventually sell the'property for integration into the medical corridor east of Southdale Hospital from France to Xerxes, north of 66' Street. We feel that placing a Housing project in the middle of this potential future expansion would impede and possibly completely interrupt such future possibilities. Mike Nelson has shared knowledge that there may already be plans in the works for combining the parcels in this corridor for future expansion and consolidation. We would also think that this development would not be in the best financial interest of the City of Edina today and certainly not in the future if it limits this expansion. Additionally it is of question whether a larger lot, at a more affordable cost, where a facility could be built for more residents than 39 may be a wiser decision. Economically it seems foolish to purchase land at 2.3 million and have an overall project cost of 10 million for a facility that will have only 39 units. We oppose the amending of the Comprehensive Plan to allow for this non - conforming use ,of land. We will support and embrace Beacon Interfaith Housing in any other location in Edina. We have faith that the City Council will take into account all aspects of this project to include both current residential .and commercial impact and also future impact to the City of Edina. We plan to be at the City Council meeting on Tuesday, September 2. We will be happy to share our thoughts and concerns at that time. Thank you. Paula and Thomas Schwartz Paula Schwartz,.Au.D. Doctor of Audiology Audiology Concepts, Inc. 6444 Xerxes Ave. South Edina, MN 55423 www.audiologvconcepts.com Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Clinic 6446 Xerxes AVe. South Edina, MN 55423 www.tinnitusclinicminnesota.com 952 - 831 -4222 fax 952 - 831 -4942 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication may contain private, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated and /or duly authorized reciplent(s). If you are not the intended recipient or have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and permanently delete all copies of this email including all attachments without reading them. If you are the Intended recipient, secure the contents In a manner that conforms to all applicable state and /or federal requirements related to privacy and confidentiality of such information. 2 ; Heather Braniain From: Dennis Fernkes <fern7313 @scc.net> Sent: Sunday, August 31,2014 12:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Project Dear Mayor Hovland, I am asking you to please approve the 66 West project. I am a 69 -year old widowed male and Edina resident. Although I was never homeless, I was sometimes jobless as a young man. But [Was given some opportunities to adjust my work hours to attend school. I was also hired at the recommendation of others for various jobs. In other words, people were willing to help me establish myself and allow me to contribute to our'society. As a result, I became successful and was never a burden to society. Whenever I see a chance to help a young person get ahead, I wonder if that person might be the one to someday find a cure for cancer or other terminal diseases. We never know what good things may come about by the young people we help. I ask you to please support this project. It will set a very good example for other communities. If Edina can do this, surely other communities can as well. Thank you in advance for your vote, Dennis Fernkes 7313 West Shore Dr Edina - Sent from my iPad. Heather Branigin From: Sue Soule <sulb3so @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 20144:57 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Planning Commission - 66 West Youth Homeless Housing Dear Commissioners and Council Members, I am writing in favor of the 66 West project providing housing and support for homeless young adults. I think that it's a good location for them in regard to transportation and potential jobs. I do not think that "homeless" means "criminal". I think it's the right,thing to do. have two concerns in regard to the project, however. First, I am concerned.as.to the method used to allow the project given the current zoning. I am worried about the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan and think it has been altered too readily in the recent past. But I am more concerned that the PUD is a shiny new toy that might be over -used or misused to circumvent the letter or intent of the Comprehensive Plan. I realize that this is a challenging process but hope that you can achieve the goal of approving the shelter while respecting the Comprehensive Plan. Thank you. Sincerely, Susan Soule Edina, MN 1 Heather Branigin From: gcampbell @gwendy.me Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartments Mayor Hovland, I live 1.2 miles from Beacon's proposed 66 West Apartments, and I whole- heartedly support this project- - 66 West Apartments,'. to provide stable, supportive housing for young adults in our community.- -- and encourage'you to do so, also. 1. 30% of homeless adults experienced homelessness as a child. 2. I see these children daily in my work at People Serving People, the largest emergency shelter for homeless children and families in Minnesota, which houses an average of 353 people /day. 3. With the 66 West Apartments, we have an opportunity close to home to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty for young adults In our own community. 4. These young adults do not choose to be homeless. (a) Those who were homeless as children may lack the supportive family environment that most .of us take for granted. (b) These young adults may not have seen self - sufficient behaviors, such as employment & stable housing, modelled: by the adults in their lives. (c) Their basic K- 12'education may have been disrupted frequently due to unstable housing, leaving them less equipped to support themselves. Over 24% of Hennepin County's homeless population lacks even a high school diploma. (d) These young adults may have undiagnosed or untreated mental health issues, aggrevated by unstable housing. (e) Finally, these young adults are sometimes fleeing from a home environment so abusive, it makes living on the streets or couch - hopping more attractive than one's own bed. Young people are most at risk of homelessness. Youth ages 21 and younger comprise 46% of our state's homeless population. We can help break that cycle of homelessness for young adults here in our community. 66 West Apartments gives young adults in our community an opportunity to build a stable, self-sufficient future for themselves and their children, an 'invaluable opportunity that we enjoyed as children. I hope you will support our community by supporting this important project. Thank you, Gwen Campbell, 6600 Southcrest Drive, Edina Heather Branigin From: Peter Yackel <ppyackel @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 8:45 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Proposal Mayor Hovland: As active members of Edina Community Lutheran Church we urge you to approve the 66 West housing proposal before the Council on September 2. We believe all of our youth deserve safe, comfortable, and supportive housing in our communities and this project is a beginning step to assure such housing in the suburbs. (Currently, there is no appropriate housing for homeless youth in the suburbs.) It would also help Edina begin to meet the city's own goal of increasing affordable housing. Thank you for considering our request. Peggy and Peter Yackel 1 Heather Brani gin From: Madrienne Larson <madriS120 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 11:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 WEST, LOCAL YOUTH HOMELESSNESS DEAR MAYOR JIM HOVLAND AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. WE SUPPORT THIS PROJECT IN EDINA, OUR HOME FOR 81 YEARS. WE HAVE BEEN LONG TIME PARSHIONERS OF ST. STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH AT 50TH AND WOODDALE. WITH TIME AWAY IN WINNIPEG FOR MEDICAL SCHOOL AND THE MAYO CLINIC IN ROCHESTER FOR A 6 YEAR RESIDENCY, WE HAVE LIVED HAPPILY IN EDINA, OUR CHERISHED HOME. EDINA IS A PRIVILEGED COMIMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN LED BY' KNOWLEDGABLE AND DEDICATED CITIZENS LIKE YOURSELVES. WE BELIEVE THIS PROJECT IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO "GIVE BACK" SOME OF THOSE PRIVILEGES TO OUR LESS FORTUNATE YOUTH, SO THAT THEY CAN RECOVER THEIR SELF ESTEEM AND BECOME PRODUCTIVE ADULTS. THE LOCATION IS PERFECT WITH BUS AVAILABILITY AND JOB OPPORTUNITIES CLOSE BY. PLEASE CONSIDER "66 WEST" AS A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR VERY SPECIAL COMMUNITY. BLESSINGS TO YOU ALL ! ! ! ! DICK AND MADRIENNE LARSON 5120 FRANCE AVE. SO #202 EDINA, MN 55410 Madrienne J. Larson AZ: (480) 471 -7130 Cell: (612) 618 -0987 i Heather Braniain From: Nancy Peterson <njopete @msn.com> Sent: Monday, September 01, 201412:02 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Supportive housing for young people experiencing homelessness To Mayor Jim Hovland and Edina City Council members Ann Swenson, Mary Brindle, Joni Bennett &Josh Sprague:. We are John & Nancy Peterson and have lived at 5945 St. Johns Ave, Edina for over 20 years. In your deliberations regarding the proposed site for 66 West, we would implore you to support this initiative. The young people it would serve are in need of some temporary support to set their lives on the right track and to gain confidence to do just that. Some have experienced homelessness with members of their birth family but are now too old to stay with their families in shelters so are on the street, some have aged out of the foster care programs, some have escaped abusive homes. In many ways they need a time for healing and, with that consideration, 66 West could well be considered to have a medical purpose, not unlike neighboring buildings. Young people who are chosen to meet the criteria of working toward stability would be very low or no risk of causing problems for people who life nearby. Please, support the location of this new facility on 66th street. John & Nancy Peterson 1 Heather Branigin From: Thomas Nelson <thomasmnelson @mac.com> Sent Monday, September 01, 2014 3:50 PM To: James Hovland; Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague7 @gmail.com; Ann Swenson; Edina Mail Cc: Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague; Jim Nelson Subject: 3330 W 66th St - Proposed Rezoning & Comp Plan Amendment Attachments: TCF Site Letter to council 9.01.14.pdf; ATT00001.htm; TCF Site Letters to Planning & Council.pdf; ATT00002.htm Mr. Mayor & Members of the Council, Correspondence for your consideration in advance of Tuesday's public hearing. Thank you, -Tom Thomas Nelson 612.805.9369 thomasmnelson @mac.com EDINA EAST LL c% Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis MN 55401 September 1, 2014 Via email to: Mayor Jim Hovland & Members of the Edina City Council RE: Opposition to Request for Re- Zoning & Amendment to Comprehensive Plan TCF Bank Building — ("Subject Site') 3330 West 66�h Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mayor Hovland & Members of the Council: We own the property immediately east of the Subject Site at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building "). This letter is a supplement to our public testimony at the August 13 Planning Commission hearing and our letters to the Council and Planning Commission dated May 19, July 21, and August 12, 2014 copies of which are attached. We will be at the public hearing Tuesday evening to speak and reiterate that we are advocates for the yet to be clearly defined Affordable- Supportive - Workforce ( "ASW ") housing for young adults and others but not at the Subject Site which will be at the expense of the smartly guided current zoning and Comp Plan. We ask the matter be continued for at least 60 days to find better alternatives and also reiterate our offer to work with the developer and the City to find better alternatives. This opportunity deserves a better balance of emotional inspiration, smart planning and thoughtful political will than currently exists. In addition to items noted in previous letters, please consider: The proposed project is one of 117 requests totaling $253 million submitted in June to the MHFA seeking this year's $100 million of annually allocated funds. The Cushman Wakefield brokers hired by the developer in June 2013 found an unlisted site in 10 short months and were ready to submit for Sketch Plan Review in April 2014. The broker's describe finding a site in their attached letter as "nearly a `miracle'." Notably missing from their effort is time and working in collaboration with the City, the business community and their collective abilities for assisting with redevelopment. Developers spend years on site selection especially in the most desired locations like the Southdale Trade Area. Whole Foods spent nearly 10 years and owners and developers have sought assembly of parcels in the easterly portion of the Southdale Regional Medical District since the late 1990's. With the Great Recession out of the way, Ryan Companies is now managing the underdeveloped buildings and land at 66`h & York and exploring the best way to accomplish re- development and fulfill the City's zoning guidance under the Comp Plan. Why should it take only 10 months and a "miracle" to find ASW housing sites in Edina? Does the proposed project at a site nearly three times more expensive than what the developer typically Mayor of Edina and City Council September 1, 2014 Page 2 pays and with a total development cost of 20 -30% greater then MHFA's comparable projects represent a realistic chance for highly competitive MHFA grant approval? Should rushing a non- conforming new project through re- zoning with barely 60 days of public conversation to appease any developer's financing deadlines supersede past, present and future City Planning goals? Are there any downsides to taking time to work in public-private partnership with the.developer and the business community on the following which may lead to more and better ASW housing projects for the City? 1. Clarify the definition of the Affordable- Supportive- Workforce ( "ASW ") housing,so that it meets the goals of all involved. 2. Communicate with the MHFA to explore "city specific" approval vs. "site- specific" approval. Suburban sites are an MHFA priority for ASW housing. Why wouldn't they be inspired to work with a sought after City like Edina and a capable developer. like Beacon to make a project happen? 3. Identify sites that do not appear to be "spot- zoning" — taking away the potential of one area for the benefit of a non - conforming use. 4. Use public financing tools and engage the business community to make the project cost competitive, maximizing the use of public fiords and public benefit (e.g. land swap with another developer as part of awarding Grandview site, TIF loan or pay -go note from expiring Centennial Lakes TIF District, HRA purchase and land lease, ASW housing dedication fee, Hennepin County land swap /purchase on portion of Southda_ le Library site ?) In three (3) short weeks, ourselves and other property owners and real estate professionals have met and/or discussed the proposed project with all of you. We have provided numerous alternative site options and deal structures and raised the right questions to ask of the MHFA. All involved are inspired to seek, a win -win rather than the win -lose as proposed and we ask for the chance, with no downside risk, to try to make that happen. Very truly yours, EDINA EAST LLC Thomas M. Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members CC w /attach Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Cary Teague, Edina City Planning Director Attachments: Developer and Southdale Site Cost Comparables, MHFA Cost Comparables, Alternative Site Listing, 3939 69h St W, Letter from Cushman and Wakefield Proposed 66 West Apartments, Edina MN SITE COST COMPARISON August 2014 Beacon's Recent Projects & Current Southdale Projects INITIAL SITE SITE SITE UNITS/ Immediate Surrounding Uses SALE PROJECT DEVEL.—LOCATION UNITS SITE COST COST/UNIT ACRE and/or Zoning Guidance Oct -07 Creekside Beacon 54th & Stevens, Mpls 30 $600,000 -COST/SF $20,000 $17 -ACRES 0.8 38 single & multi family res., church, Commons (land donated by neighboring church) neighborhood commercial Oct -07 Nicollet Square Beacon 37th & Nicollet, Mpls 42 $1,200,000 $28,571 $27 1.02 41 single & multi family residential, neighborhood commercial Sep -12 Prior Crossing Beacon 1949 University, St. Paul 44 $615,200 $13,982 $19 0.9 49 TN "Traditional Neigborhood" Zoning Guidance on Green Line Jul -14 7200 France Boisclair 7200 France, Edina 195 $5,500,000 $28,205 $33 3.88 50 Single family & senior housing, office Jul -14 Lennar Project Lennar 6725 York, Edina 242 $7,400,000 $30,579 $37 4.61 52 Single family res., grocery, retail From: Oyen, Cam (MHFA) CameronAyen @state.mn.us Subject:, RE: Total Development Costs Per Unit Date: August 20,2014 at 3:43 PM To: thomasmneison @rnac.com Cc: Cegla; Jim (MHFA) Jim.CeglaQstate.mn.us, Myers, Shannon (MHFA) Shannon.Myers@state.mn.us Mr. Nelson: After discussion and analysis, we find that we do not have the data that you requested readily available. 1) Adaptive re -use, aka conversion, is only rarely included in applications we receive. 2) Total Development Cost figures that we retain are the budgeted numbers submitted by applicants. As you may know, these numbers are likely to change between application and occupancy. Pulling even what data we do have would require creating a new report, which would involve significant staff time to produce. With limited IT resources, the request would have to be approved and given a priority by the Operations Committee. There would then be a charge for producing the data, based in part on that staff time expense. If you have questions, please contact me. Cam Oyen I Minnesota Housing 1400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 1 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651.296.8102 1 800.657.3647 1 Fax 651.205.4233 1 tty: 651.297.2361 cameron.oyen @state.mn.us Minnesota Housing finances affordable housing for low- and moderate - income households while fostering strong communities. From: Thomas Nelson fmailto:thomasmnelsonCamac.coml Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 9:29 AM To: Cegla, Jim (MHFA) Subject: Re: Total Development Costs Per Unit Hi Jim, Any progress on this? Thank you, -Tom Thomas Nelson 612.805.9369 thomasmnelson @mac.com On Aug 11, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Thomas Nelson <thomasmnelson(2mac.com> wrote: Jim, Have you been able to track anything down? Thank you, Thomas Nelson b1L . 8 05.93W thomosmnelson@mac.com On Aug 5, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Cegla, Jim (MHFA) <Jim.Cegla state.mn.us> wrote: We'll look into it and get back to you. Jim Cegla I Minnesota Housing 1 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 1 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651..297.3126 11.800.657.3769 1 tty: 651.297.2361 Minnesota Housing.flnances and advances affordable housing opportunities for low and moderate Income Minnesotans to enhance quality of life and foster strong communities. [Please consider the environment before printing this e- mail.] From: Thomas Nelson rmailto:thomasmnelsonCa)mac.00ml Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 8:59 AM To: Cegla, Jim (MHFA) Subject: Re: Total Development Costs Per Unit Jim, I did find this information previously on your website and wondering if you can help find something more specific: Total Development Costs ( "TDC ") for adaptive reuse in the metro area for zero or one bedroom units. Is it possible to find this? Thanks, Thomas Nelson 612.805.9369 thomosmnelson @mac.com On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Cegla, Jim (MHFA) <Jim,Ceglakstate.mn.us> wrote: Hello Thomas. I suggest that you take a look at the report at the following link. If it doesn't answer your questions, please submit exactly what you are asking for and the time period you want covered, and we will determine if we have it in a form that's easily accessible, or if we need to create it, for which there may be a charge. Development Cost Trends in Multifamily Housing, 2013 Jim Cegla I Minnesota Housing 1 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 1 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651.297.3126 11.800.657.3769 1 tty: 651.297.2361 Minnesota Housing finances and.advances affordable housing opportunities for low and mnriPratP InrnmP Minnacntanc to anhanr.o rniality of Ufa anri fnctar cfrnncr rnmmtinitiac ' si;lUll wo :.. " Gast 00 Flna>3'cing J► pate ivlz TDC Shares With the sample sorted by all project types simultaneously it is possible to see the influence that individual project types have on the average cost shares (Table 5). Acquisition costs account for a much smaller share of TDC for new construction projects than for rehabilitation, while- the opposite is true of construction costs' share of TDC. Soft costs make up a large share of TDC for LIHTC projects. Table 5: Refined Analysis Cost Shares by Project Type ' PrbJect ` _. Type" Sa'Mple :Size `A►ierage TDC Per -unit _ 'd IuisitiQn ConsCriuction_ • -° Soft - ALL 412 $161,791 15.35% 65.03% 19.61%. ALL ACQ PROJECTS 284 $186,825 20.95% 58.29% 20.77% ACQ: 'NEW CON: LIHTC: METRO: 70 137;308' 8.24% 67 4$ %: = 24.31% ACQ NEW CON NON LIHTC METRO 18 $202,842 10.16% 72.06% 17.78% ACQ NEW CON LIHTC GR. MN 45 $186,321 4.99% 71.84% 23.17% ACQ NEW CON NON LIHTC GR. MN 25 $183,501 6.58% 76.59% 16.83% ACQ; REHAB: LIHTC, METI20 37; $1978399; X5111% 41.15 % 217.4% ACQ REHAB NON LIHTC METRO 39 $123,891 41.43% 43.32% 15.26% ACQ REHAB LIHTC GR. MN 29 $149,746 35.48% 43.15% 21.37% ACQ REHAB NON LIHTC GR. MN 21 $117,403 42.37% 42.73% 14.89% (See note 4 for explanation of cost groups) -20- Data and Methodology The data used for the following analyses came from 581 Minnesota Housing financed projects from the time span between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2012. The data source was Minnesota Housing's form 402, the agency's application -for project financing. The data was drawn from each project's loan closing. The form requires that the applicant outline the size and scope of the project and state all expected development costs broken down into various categories. The cost breakout includes: TDC, acquisition costs, new construction costs, rehabilitation costs, environmental costs, developer fees, financing costs, professional fees, syndication fees, non - mortgageable costs, and missing costs. All costs reported in the findings are Inflation- adjusted using a combination of the Producer Price Indices for Residential Construction and Residential Maintenance and Repair and the Employment Cost Index. The costs are provided on a per -unit basis unless otherwise noted. The applicant provides the information and data and may include reporting. errors. The sample was filtered to remove projects with obvious coding errors and projects that did not include any construction costs. This process reduced the sample size to 412 projects. Next, a cost adjustment methodology s was applied to the sample in order to account for differences in unit sizes among projects. Projects were classified by whether they consisted of units primarily for "Singles," "Families /Mixed," or "Large Families." "Singles" are defined as projects where the share of efficiencies and 1 bedroom units is 75% or greater. "Large Families" are defined as projects where the share of units with 3 or more bedrooms is 50% or greater. "Families /Mixed" applies to all the remaining projects. These classifications were then separated by whether they were new construction or rehabilitation projects. At this point a "cost adjustment" was made using factors that serve to increase the costs of "Singles" projects and to decrease the costs of "Large Families" projects. The adjustments try to make development costs equivalent to' "Families /Mixed" projects. "Singles" projects generally cost less; thus their costs were increased. "Large Families" projects generally cost more than "Families /Mixed" projects; thus their costs were reduced. The adjustment factors used were 1.17 for new construction "Singles" projects (increasing costs by 17 %), 1.30 for rehabilitation "Singles" projects (increasing costs by 30%), 0.96 for new construction "Large Families" projects (decreasing costs by 4 %), and 0.85 for rehabilitation "Large Families" projects (decreasing costs by 15 %). These factors were devised by looking at historical differences between these types of projects. -6- Research Intern Discussion Paper Development Cost Trends in Multifamily Housing August 2013 Brian Deppe Graduate Student University of Minnesota, Humphrey School of Public Affairs 4 m® all ma In Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Ij11111hCUSfHMAN I NORTHMARCH 3500Amantin eap Vii., N5 200 WAKE1FIE LD -, Minneapolis. kit .100 �� ►� 952.831.1000 custzwakenm com 'To Whom It May Concern: We wanted to summarize our thoughts as it relates to the Edina land market as well as our efforts to find a site on behalf of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. We are the land acquisition specialists at Cushman &. Wakefield /NorthMarq for the Twin Cities real estate market and have a combined 20 years of experience. We have represented numerous clients within the City of Edina and we understand the land /development market well. In June 2013, after Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative had searched for over six months, we were hired to assist with site acquisition. We had recently analyzed the Edina market for multiple clients in need of land sites within Edina. In addition, we had recently represented a bank in the search for a new site within the Edina City limits. We were ultimately able to find a land lease for them, at an extremely high price (higher than what Beacon was able to pay). In our opinion, Edina is an expensive market with very little opportunity for most uses, Currently, Numerous Users and Developers are looking for sites within the Edina area and not finding willing Sellers. Edina, in our opinion, is one of most difficult and expensive micro markets within the Twin Cities metro. The others are the 494 strips, 394 strip from MILS to 494, and Minneapolis CBD. (Uptown is also tough and expensive for housing). Finding Beacon Interfaith a site within budget was nearly a "miracle" and a task that we did not think possible at the out -set. In our opinion, this is the perfect marriage between Buyer and Seller. Beacon's ability to re -use a significant portion of the existing infrastructure is what makes this development work. It is very clear that this IS NOT a land purchase but a specialized conversation. We did an in depth market search of Edina when we began working with Beacon. After understanding the search criteria and budget, we encouraged Beacon to look outside the City of Edina due to lack of options within the search area and budget. Edina is a very strong market and one that is not easily penetrated. Beacon Interfaith directed us to not only look for vacant development sites and re- development sites (which do not exist within budget) but also look .for anything within the search parameters that could be acquired for a conversion. We contacted numerous existing apartment owners with the hopes of converting the use to affordable housing. We found no willing sellers. We looked at industrial conversions as well. Land prices in Edina are at all -time highs today and thdre is a lack of vacant land opportunities. We are currently representing two market rate developers looking for development opportunities in Edina, but we haven't been able to find any opportunity for them, despite searching for over one year. After countless calls and analysis, we were able to locate a vacant industrial property on Ohms Lane that the owner was potentially willing to sell. We submitted an offer and ultimately could not come to terms. In addition, informal conversations with the sen-ice provider and City leaders indicated that the industrial area of Edina was not the prefen-ed location for the project. 111 CtlJrSH MAN & � 3500 American Blvd. w., Site 200 � !!� WA�EFIElrH ®" NORTHMARQ r4inneapo95 83 .100 952.831.10Q0 cush"kenm.com We continued to call on properties that were not on the market looking for any opportunity, including existing multi- family properties. We located two contiguous commercial properties on Xerxes that had potential. 'rhe combined lot size of the two parcels was just over a half acre (smaller than the TCF site). Seller expectation for the sites exceeded the price of the TCF property and .Beacon could not utilize any of the existing improvements. This was a very common theme throughout conversation with many Edina property owners, In February 2014, we were able to get some traction on the TCF property. The property was not being openly marketed for sale but TCF indicated a willingness to sell the site. We had previously toured the propetty with another Bank client. Given TCF's requested price, the deal would only work if Beacon could re -use the existing building. After determining that the building could be converted we were able to come to an agreement for the acquisition of the property, In nearly all real estate transactions you either get value for the existing improvements or value for the land, not both. In this extremely rare transaction, there is value in both the existing vertical improvements and the land. Both the Buyer and Seller benefit from a strong ]arid value while also receiving additional value for the existing improvements, In our combined twenty year careers, we have yet to see a situation as unique as this transaction. If Beacon were unable to re -use the existing building, the economics of the transaction would not have worked. We can't think. of another transaction similar to this situation where an existing building is converted into a different use while still allowing for an expansion. It truly is a win -win scenario and one that Beacon could not duplicate elsewhere in Edina. We continue to look in Edina on behalf of our other clients. i.f you are aware of any developmentfre- developinent opportunity please let us know as we have willing and eager buyers. We are available to discuss further if needed. Sincerely, Luke Appert Cushman & WakefieldlNorth.Marq 952.893.8238 ;Jon Rausch Cushman & Wakefield/NorthMarq 952.893.8251 +sl�.r.tuschiir c•u:bta aa�!>>�,t.ct.,�z: PROPERTY FEATURES • Great single tenant building • 9,653 square feet available • Convenient location in Edina off of France Ave with easy access to Highway 62 and 1-494 • Area amenities including Tavern on France, M &I Bank, Southdale Mall, Galleria and many others For more information, please contact SKIP MEUN Senior Director 952.465.3377 william.melin@cushwakenm.com IgIIII1. WAKEFIELD I NORTHMARQ QIi 3500American Blvd.W.,Suite 200 M'mneapolis, MN 55431 1 aashwakenm.com BUILDING FEATURES 9,653 SF AVAILABLE IrS! r fr 1 Div id qn h/ � y e r s A Ou to �;• � i ; t. t VV :1 R M J � � 'L. IrS! r fr 1 Div id qn h/ � y e r s A Ou to �;• � i ; t. t VV :1 R M i"+f►srf APP 1b rAjt� ww.: t�..tae Orwtwwu.s;; r. 7, ,- r Edina - 3939 69th Street West 0WAKE'" E'D I NoRrt -�MARQ EDINA EAST LLC clo Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington A.venix North #3100 Minneapolis MN.55401 August l2, 2014 Via email to: Kevin.Staunton Chair, Edina Planning . Commission & Members of the .Edina Planning Commission RE: Opposition :to;Request' for Re- Zoning &. Amendment to ComprehensiverPlan TCF.Banit Building— (" Siiojeet Site") 3330 West:66 Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mr. Staunton & ]Members of the Commission: This letter is a supplement to our letter to the Planning Commission:dated July: 21;:2014 and our letter to the City Council dated May 1 �'s, 2014 copies of which are attached. We ownthe property: immediately east of the Subject Site aV3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina :East Building ".). We will be at the public Bearing: tomorrow evening to speak.. In addition to the Information in out letters we ask you to consider three. (3) things: • First; we fully understand and_ support the: need for: supportive housing for.young adults. In the Minneapolis residential neighborhood where: my family lives, we are financial contributors to a facility blocks from our home: I drive by it. on my .way to work and our daughters and their friends pedal by it on their way to Sebastian Joe's for _ice. cream. • Second, we have-been commercial real estate investors and developers in Edina and in this neighborhood for three generations. We choose to'invest in part because as one of you noted at the last meeting, "Great cities were Wilt with plans in mind." Edina plannemand;leaders do not make reactive decisions or engage.in hurried "spot zoning" to placate non - conforming projects: They listen to the sentiment and plan smartly. —the expansion of the. RegionaCMedical District in the Comp Plan is a perfect.exampie. Third, does this request represent the best effort of the, City to facilitate the need for supportive housing projects?. Has.them been, as Chairman Staunton renfarked, "Structured conversation... that invglves the. public ?" Are the use and. its Pules clear? is just -39 units on .a site that costs nearly.23 times that of comparablel housing sites in the Southdale arm and requires complete rezon6& multiple varianees and an amendment,to the Comp Plan the bestthat can. be done? Could better planning lead to doubling or tripling the opportunities to build; supportive facilities in .Edina without the need for such: complicated land use changes? We. urge the Commission to deny the proposed requests and seek alternative locations. We would look forward :to voluntarily being part of working with the City and the developer to pursue more suitable. sites. V. ery truly yours, EDINAEAST LLC Yom_ Thomas_M.Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members. cc: Mayor Hovland, Scott Neal; and Cary Teague EDINA EAST LLC c% Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis MN 55401 July 21, 2014 Via email to: Kevin Staunton, Chair, Edina Planning Commission & Members of the Edina Planning Commission RE:. Proposed Redevelopment Plan by Beacon Interfaith Housing Opposition to Request for Re- Zoning & Amendment to Comprehensive Plan TCF Bank Building — ("Subject Site ") 3330 West 66th Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mr. Staunton & Members of the Commission: We own the property immediately east at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building "), which we purchased from the tax - exempt American Cancer Society and redeveloped for medical and commercial use. Both our property and the Subject Site are located within the City of Edina's prized and consistently growing Regional Medical District (the This district was expanded as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and we oppose re- zoning and/or amending the Comp Plan to allow for any non - conforming use that will dilute the full potential of its intended zoning allowances. The RMD allows for up to 12 stories of height to accommodate a variety of intense uses that have synergy with its long standing anchor, Fairview Southdale Hospital, and its ever expanding volume of surgery centers, medical office space, clinics, laboratories, general office and other supportive commercial uses. The district was expanded in 2008 because it represents an important part of Edina's current and future reputation as a nationally recognized top tier community with the ability to attract the type of uses afforded by having a thriving RMD across the street from regional mall. In line with the goals of the expanded RMD, significant capital was invested to re- purpose our Edina East Building by ownership and our tenants, Dermatology Specialists, PA and Peoples Bank of Commerce. The magnitude of use was increased, the property was added back to Edina's commercial property tax rolls and it is now a viable component of the RMD. The same is occurring with the recent construction of the Twin Cities Orthopedics Building, the $42 million expansion of Fairview Southdale Hospital, the 60,000 square foot addition by IRET to Southdale Medical and Mount Development's 6500 France Senior Housing project. Other capable developers have footholds near the Subject Site with United Properties owning the Southdale Place Building and parking lot immediately west and Ryan Companies now managing the two buildings on the underdeveloped 5.67 acre site one parcel east at the corner of 66`h and York. Mr. Kevin Staunton City of Edina Planning Commission July 21, 2014 Page 2 Guiding responsible commercial development has been a cornerstone of intelligent City leadership creating "win- wins" for developers, citizens and the City. Changing current law to allow the proposed development would be a "win" for a single, non - conforming project, but a confusing "lose" for the RMD and its owners who have based their planning and investments on the wishes the City ,of Edina outlined in its Comprehensive Plan as the highest and best use for the Subject Site. Once the laws are changed they will be difficult, if not impossible to reverse for a completed project likely subject to 30 plus year affordable housing financing. We urge the Planning Commission, City Council and City Planners to use their expertise to seek "win-win" alternatives for the Beacon concept rather than rush through substantial, "one -off" modifications on an expensive site in the middle of the RMD at a gateway comer to one of only two north -south arteries through the RMD (Barrie Road). Randomly carving out this site this could have a negative effect on larger re- developments. that may involve assembly of parcels and/or require these comers for best access and visibility. We note that Beacon's willingness and ability to pay more than double the most recent comparable multi- family land cost per unit (Subject Site: $2.3 million/39 units= $59,000 /unit vs. 7200 France site: $5.5 million/195 units = $28,200 /unit) will greatly expand the pool of potential alternatives. We have met with the Beacon representatives, toured their inspiring projects and are aware of the well intended populist sentiment garnered at church gatherings and through pre- printed supportive post card signings: It is clear that there is citizen support for a Beacon project in Edina so why shouldn't it be located where it can offer a "win -win" for those served by the concept without compromising the potential of the expanded Regional Medical District? We request the that the Planning Commission and City Council deny the requests for rezoning and a Comp Plan amendment and continue to work with the developer to seek alternatives so the concept can move forward. Very truly yours, EDINA EAST LLC Thomas M. Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members CC Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina Scott Neal, Edina City Manager Cary Teague, Edina Community Development Director EDINA EAST LLC c% Eberhardt Properties, Inc. 333 Washington Avenue North #300 Minneapolis AEV 55401 May 19, 2014 Via email to: Mayor Jim Hovland & _ Members of the Edina City, Council RE: Tuesday, May 201h Council Meeting Proposed Redevelopment Plan — Sketch Plan Review TCF Bank Building — ( "Subject Site') 3330 West 66th.Street, Edina MN 55435 Dear Mayor Hovland & Members of the Council: We own the property immediately east at 3316 West 66th Street (the "Edina East Building'), which we purchased from the tax - exempt American Cancer Society in 2004. and redeveloped for medical and commercial use in 2006. Both our property and the Subject Site are located within the City of Edina's prized and consistently growing Regional Medical District (the "RMD "). Significant capital was invested to re- purpose the Edina East Building by ownership and our tenants, Dermatology Specialists, PA and Peoples Bank of Commerce. The magnitude of use was increased, the property was added back to Edina's commercial property tax rolls and it is now a viable component the RMD. These efforts in 2006 were only an initial step toward realizing the full re- development potential afforded by the zoning guidelines of the RMD as part of the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The guidelines allow for up to 12 stories of height to accommodate a variety of intense uses that have synergy with the RMD's long standing anchor, Fairview Southdale Hospital and its ever expanding volume of surgery centers, medical office space, clinics, laboratories, general office and other supportive commercial uses. The district is zoned this way because represents an important part of Edina's current and future reputation as a nationally recognized top tier community with the ability to attract the type of uses afforded by having a thriving RMD across the street from regional mall. We oppose amending the Comprehensive Plan to allow for any non - confirming use that will dilute the full potential of the RMD's zoning allowances. In particular we object because the Subject Site represents a small, but centrally located primary corner on one of only two north -south arteries through the RMD (Barrie Road). Allowing for a small, non-.conf6rnflhg use pn.& key. corner ;6ouldi.dg,ativ..ely.r. affect, �larger iredevelopments that may involve assembly; of pare 61i.and/ortequirel ese;oorn corners for proper access and vi We further oppo 4e as' -the zt . City has an abundance of othei: districts4here. it could accommodate the proposed use where alt ivvblve4:equld:, gam : from its intended:benefits without having: to compromise the benefits of an: important site.,WitY a thriving; well planned4nd dedicated: Regional Medical Distict. We hope. that the City can work with the developer to identify these locations and that their. project can continue to move forward. Veit' truly Y()Uts EDINA. EAST LLC Thomas A Nelson & James W. Nelson Its Members CC ScottlieaL EctinaiCit y -Manager .Carey Teaguej E.dina:Community Development Director: Heather Branigin From: Eric Laron <larso128 @umn.edu> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 7:22 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Geeta Subject: To Mayor Hovland: support for 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing on behalf of my wife, Geeta, and myself, to support the approval of the 66 West apartments for homeless young adults. We are 20 -year residents of Edina who live near Southdale. I am a physician who works with homeless people, among other patients. I used to work at 6525 Drew Avenue South, near the proposed apartments; and our two children went to Step By Step Montessori. We would have been thrilled when our kids were young to have this new development, and remain thrilled today at the possibility. From what we have learned, it is congruent with the strategic plan for the city. It serves a huge need. I went to the two Planning Commission meetings at which it was supported by the city staff and the Commission. To those who have expressed concern, I would tell them that these people are already in the community, hanging out at Southdale..Some of them sleep in backyards or hide in doorways and foyers of businesses. They are here. Why don't we help a small number of them get safe housing, facilitate their getting a job and an education, and help them begin to contribute in a positive way to our economy and city society? Do They want to reduce crime? Then approve this apartment building. Others might or might not care that this project will compassionately serve people who are vulnerable and largely unloved, but if they resonate with that all the better. I thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this proposal and look forward to its approval. Sincerely, Eric W. Larson, MD 1 Heather Branigin From: Gmail <tk4603 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 7:53 PM Toc " Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor Hovland and Council members, We write to urge you to support the 66 W. Apartment project. We know first hand that homelessness is a problem in Edina and the western suburbs. We have also been involved in supporting Beacon Interfaith Housing and before it the Plymouth Neighborhood Foundation for many, many years. We know that it is a first class organization that will follow through on its commitments and make this housing an asset in our community. Tom Anderson and Kathryn Hagen 4603 Drexel Ave. 1 Heather Branigin From: James Cross <james.crossm n@comcast. net> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 7:58 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West / Beacon Support Dear Mayor Hoveland, I am writing to urge your support for the 66 West / Beacon Interfaith project. It's a worthwhile project and a great opportunity for the City of Edina and it's residents. I know there are zoning and master plan changes needed. If not that location, where else would such a facility fit within our community? Please support the project by approving whatever changes are needed. Respectfully, Jim Cross 5928 Abbott Ave S Edina, MN 55410 612- 205 -6199 Heather Branigin From: Jack Rice <ricecompany @aol.com> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 9:46 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Beacon proposal Jim, I received a call from Bernie Beaver last week re Beacon. He asked me to contact you re our experience with Minnesota Life College. Minnesota Life College is a tenant in one of our apartment buildings at the Colony of Richfield, located on the NWC of 35W and West 76th St. Minnesota Life College is a transitional housing and coaching experience for developmentally challenged young men and women. It's mission is provide a place where the students are introduced to daily skills needed to live in society. Shopping, laundry, budgeting, transportation, punctuality etc. The students are typically transitioning from home to Minnesota Life. They come from supportive families with the cost being privately funded by the families and fund raising. There are full time resident counselors on location at all times. The above seemingly describes about what Beacon offers with the exception that presumably the Minnesota Life College students come from a more nurturing family background and enjoy continued strong family support Minnesota Life College has been a tenant at The Richfield Colony Homes for several years with very few problem incidents. The College from time to time has looked at finding their own building but the recession hampered fundraising and I believe they have just extended their lease for another year. I'd like to talk to you about the above at your convenience. Thanks, Jack Jack Rice 1612-341-2464 4001 West 49th St. Edina, MN 55424 ricecompanyOD-aol.com Heather Branigin,.....:, From: Sent To: Cc: Subject Hi Mayor Hovland, Betsy Cruz <speedyb50 @hotmai1.com> Monday, September 01, 2014.8:0S PM Edina Mail ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org Please support 66 West Apartments My name is Betsy Cruz, and I am, a member of St. Stephens Episcopal Church in Edina,. asking you to vote yes to support the 66 West Apartments. I am also a resident of Bloomington, and a teacher at Kennedy High School in Bloomington. I would like share my perspective as an educator about why the 66 West Apartments are so important for our homeless youth. I learned early on in my career as a teacher to stop making assumptions. It is easy to assume that because I don't see homeless people on a daily basis, it's not a problem in our community. But the fact is, I do see homeless people on a daily basis — it's just not apparent that they are homeless. I assumed that because we live in an affluent community, any youths who were experiencing homelessness must have options, places to go, and support services: When I found out one of my favorite students was homeless, and there was practically nothing I could do for him and no place for him to go, I realized once again that I need to stop making assumptions. The second thing I have learned as an educator is that nobody wants to fail. Everyone wants to have the ability to live independently and to control the direction of his or her life. When someone isn't able to do this, don't assume it's because he is lazy or she is incapable. Most likely, it is because he or she simply still needs to be taught the skills necessary for independent living. This is what I like so much about 66 West Apartments: they are not just a place for our homeless youths to live, but they are a place where they can learn to be independent, where they can fill in the gaps in their life skills education, and where they can finally experience what it is like to be a part of a supportive community. -'If a student came to my class unable to read or do math, it would be completely unacceptable for me, as an educator, to blame the student or say it's not my problem, and tell him to get out of my class and figure it out on his own. We know that there is simply a knowledge gap, and it can be remedied, and that student can experience success. So when we have a homeless youth who comes to us with gap in life skills, we can't just pretend like he's not there, like it's her fault, like they will go away if we do nothing. What kind of a community would we be if we denied help the most vulnerable, if we refused to educate those with the most potential to dramatically improve? That is not the kind of community that Edina is, and that is why I ask you to support the 66 West Apartments. Thank you, Betsy Cruz 8109 Dupont Ave S Bloomington, MN 55420 952 - 888 -1674 Heather Braniain From: Karen Contag <karen.contag @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September,01, 2014 8:59 PM T& Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Support for Homeless Youth,Housing Project Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am writing in support of the Homeless Youth Housing Project being proposed for the former TCF Building near Southdale. Through the Metro Homeless Youth Programs of Lutheran Social Service,-) have been involved in working with homeless youth for the past nine years. Most recently, I have been working as a volunteer with, homeless young adults on resume writing once a month at Rezek House in St. Paul for the past two .years. For the past four years, my family has provided lunch food for Safehouse, an emergency youth shelter in St. Paul. My family has also organized fundraisers for the Metro Homeless Youth programs as well as organized sock and.toiletry drives for these programs. My involvement in the Metro Homeless Youth programs began when I learned that most teens and young adults are homeless because they feel safer on the streets than in their own homes. They are not bad kids, they have just suffered enough abuse and neglect from the "responsible" adults.in their lives that they are driven out of their homes. I could only look at my then very young kids and feel immense sadness that parents would not want to do everything in their, Power to safely and successfully launch their children. I decided I had to get involved, because these kids deserved the same care and support I wanted to give my own kids. Since I became involved in working with homeless youth I have been amazed at how resilient these kids are - many of them continue in school despite the lack of permanent housing. Homeless youth need the same support that any teen or young adult needs, only they do not have the same supportive network that most families in Edina strive to give their kids. Edina has been recognized for its great schools, for being a great place to raise a family, and for a community that embraced Search Institute's asset based model for youth development. Wouldn't it be a great thing for Edina to show that it desires success for all young adults by its acceptance of a homeless youth housing project? I sincerely hope that as a leader in this community you will vote in favor of allowing the proposed homeless youth housing project to go through. Please be a voice in supporting these young people, and showing them that there are many in the community who care about their success and are part of their cheering section. Thank you for your support. Should you have any questions regarding my experience working as an advocate and volunteer for homeless youth, please do not hesitate to e-mail me at karen.contag @email.com Best regards, Karen Contag Heather Braniain From: Dawnmeniel @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 7:26 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: YES FOR 66 WEST DEVELOPMENT to: Honorable Mayor Hovland and City Council Members I have been a resident of Edina for 43 years at 5912 Chowen Ave. S. I am writing in support of the proposed 66 West project for suburban homeless youth at 3360 W. 66th.St. just six blocks south of my home. The need for housing for homeless,youth is of great importance. Beacon Interfaith Housing has a proven track record especially.with Niwllet .Square as an example. The project has the ongoing support of local churches. What an opportunity to make a positive difference in young people's lives. Let's show Edina's values and be a welcoming community. The state of Minnesota's housing fund deadlines are running out and the project would be delayed another year. Let's help homeless youth in Edina TODAY. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Dawn Menzel 1 Heather Branigin From: Larry <Iwedlund @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 7:39 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West As a member of Edina Community Lutheran Church I would like to urge Edina city council to pass the 66 West proposal at tonight's council meeting. I am committed to the long range success of this project and, as a member of Edina Community Lutheran Church will be volunteering time and money to keep 66 West viable now and into the future. Sincerely, Lawrence W, Edlund 612 - 861 -6241 1 Heather Branigin From: James Caspar <jacaspar @usfamily.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 8:28 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 west - YES Dear City Council, I am writing in support of approval of the 66 West youth /young adult housing. Erik Strand, in his Startrib editorial captures what I wish to say -This is the Edina I want to live in! Thank you for your thoughtful consideration, Teresa Caspar 5713' Dale Ave Edina 1 Heather Braniain From: Dragseth <mdragseth @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 8:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Youth Housing City Council Members, A very important issue is coming to you tonight - youth homelessness. As a 43 year member of this,great community and one who spent 39 years working in multiple positions with students and families through the Edina Public Schools I know first hand the need to help these young people have the stability and support needed to be successful, Please honor the Edina tradition of supporting all in our community in need and approve the housing for the homeless project. It Will again confirm the fact that Edina is a special place for all. Thank you for reading this and your service to the City of Edina. Ken Dragseth 6058 Blake Ridge Road Edina, MN 55436 mdragseth @comcast.net Sent from my Wad 1 ._--* _e Larkin Ho, f fm m ATTORNEYS August 29, 2014 Mayor Hovland and Council Members City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952- 835-3800 FAX: 952 -89�6�- '3333 wla.rl WEB: wwdnholl=rnan.com Re: Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project, 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Our File No. 23193 -02 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: We represent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, P.A. and Advanced Skin Therapeutics with regard the opposition to the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative ( "Beacon ") supportive housing project located at 3330 West 66th Street (the "Project "), located in the City of Edina (the "City"). We commend the City's for its efforts to locate a site in Edina for supportive housing for homeless teens. However, as we have stated on the record repeatedly, the City's hasty efforts to locate the Project in the Edina Regional Medical District (the "RM District ") have resulted in numerous policy, procedural, and legal errors in the rezoning process for the proposed Project. Moreover, the City's concerted efforts to assist the Project due to strong public pressure are leading the City towards implementing poor planning and short- sighted public policy that will discourage future investment in the RM District. This letter is intended to supplement the legal and procedural arguments that we have previously entered into the record in our letters to the City Planning Commission, dated July 22, 2014, and August 12, 2014 (Exhibits A & B), which are incorporated herein by reference and are to be made part of the record for the City Council's September 2, 2014 public hearing. In addition, we have summarized a number of concerns below. 1. Approving the Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development ("PUD") Would be Bad Public Policy and Discourage Future Development in the RM District. The City Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the proposed comprehensive plan (the "Comp Plan") amendment on August 13, 2014, following extensive deliberations, reflects the recognition that the proposed amendment is not appropriate, but rather intended to simply find a way to move the Project forward. The Planning Commission's deliberations made clear that the proposed approach would be bad comprehensive planning and that the community deserves a Mayor Hovland and Council Members August 29, 2014 Page 2 comprehensive analysis of the impacts of the proposed amendments. To date, however, the City has attempted to push;the Project forward in order to allow the Project to meet certain funding deadlines, regardless_ of impact on the community. This hasty approach is poor public policy for a variety of reasons. a. The Comp Plan Amendment is Incompatible with the RM District. The RM District is intended to serve hospitals, medical and dental offices, and clinics, as well as other land uses "having: a direct relationship to the providing of health services. "' The argument has been made by some at the Planning Commission meeting that supportive housing is similar to senior housing. However, supportive housing is not remotely analogous or even similar to senior housing and would have no rational relationship to the providing of health services. Whereas senior housing is intended to serve the needs of the aging population by providing an integral medical care component, =ep would provide non - medical supportive services in the form of teaching residents to a job, learn budgeting, and pursue educational goals. While these services are no doubt beneficial to the individual residents, they have no rational connection to the intent of the RM District whatsoever. The RM District is intended for larger medical type uses, which is evidenced by the 10 acre minimum lot size contemplated in the IW District. Approval of the Project would remove this one- acre parcel from future medical office development potential in the RM District. The central location of the parcel in the RM District and the limited acreage of contiguous property east of Barrie Road would make it virtually impossible to assemble a 10 acre lot in the future. This would damage the integrity of the RM District and greatly hinder the future viability of the large scale medical development sought for the area, which is currently being considered by several prominent development companies, including Ryan Companies. b. The Proposed PUD Would be Inconsistent with the Zoning Code and Greatly Increase the Existing Parking Problems. The Project fails to meet one of the most basic land use controls, off - street parking. As noted in the staff report, the off- -street parking requirement is 39 enclosed parking stalls in addition to guest parking. This requirement is intended to mitigate off -site impacts and ensure that dwelling units can remain viable by accommodating the parking needs of residents. The Project complies with neither the requirement that parking is enclosed, nor the minimum requirement of 39 spaces. As proposed, the Project will include only 19 parking spaces, approximately half of the required parking spaces, all of which will be located on a surface parking lot. Even with the proof of parking provided, the Project could only ever accommodate 37 spaces, none of which would be enclosed. Not only would approval exacerbate the already difficult parking situation in the immediate 1 Comp Plan 4 -30. Mayor Hovland and Council Members August 29, 2014 Page 3 vicinity, creating conflict between Project residents and adjacent business and property owners, but it will have a negative economic impact on these surrounding property owners, causing them to lose business due to customers who are frustrated with the parking problems that the Project will create. c. The City is Rushing to Approve the Beacon Project Despite Not Fully Understanding the Zoning Implications of Introducing Such a Supportive Housinia Use to the RM District. The Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the proposed affordable housing language in the proposed Comp Plan amendment was the result of significant concerns about the impacts of such a hastily approved amendment. Adopting language to amend the Comp Plan to allow "affordable housing," an undefined term, in the RM District (and only the. RM District), would have significant implications by expressly allowing this type of housing in a single concentrated district in the City. Moreover, the proposed use is not simply an affordable housing project, but a supportive housing project with on -site services, a use that is unlike any existing land use in the City: This issue warrants a thoughtful and deliberate approach, and we strongly encourage the City Council to take the necessary time to study these issues and best practices for establishing the proper definitions of such supportive housing uses in the City's zoning code before proceeding with any Comp Plan amendments. 2. Adopting the Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning the Property For:the Sole Benefit of the Applicant Would Constitute Illegal Spot Zoning. The City's rushed approach to the Project, seeking to amend the Comp Plan and rezone the property, would not only be poor public policy, but it would very clearly be an act of illegal spot zoning for the interest of a single property owner and proposed Project, which happens to have strong church and political support within the City. Minnesota law prohibits spot- zoning, defined as the "reclassification of a small area of land in a manner that is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood for the benefit of the property owner and to the detriment of others." Z Factors for determining illegal spot - zoning include the following: • Whether the zoning.of the parcel in question is in accordance with a comprehensive plan; • whether the zoning of the subject parcel is compatible with the uses in the surrounding area; and • whether the zoning of the subject property serves the public welfare or merely confers a discriminatory benefit on the owner of the property.3 `Amcon Corp. v. Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66, 73 n.6 (Minn. 1984). 3 See Determination Whether Zoning or Rezoning of a Particular Parcel Constitutes Spot Zoning, 73 A.L.R. 5th 223. Mayor Hovland and Council Members August 29, 2014 Page 4 Here, the proposed rezoning and Comp Plan. Amendment for the benefit of the Project and to the detriment of the adjacent property owners would violate Minnesota's prohibition of spot- zoning. As described above, the parcel to be rezoned is a small plot of land, less than an acre in size, and the proposed supportive housing use is incompatible with the surrounding RM District. In evaluating the determinative factors, it is apparent that approval of the project would clearly constitute spot - zoning and would not be upheld by Minnesota courts. The proposed rezoning of the parcel is wholly inconsistent with the Comp Plan, so much so that without changing the language of the Comp Plan, it would.not be permissible. Even with the proposed Comp Plan amendment, the proposed rezoning would erode the integrity of the district, negatively impact ongoing investments, discourage future investments, diminish the tax base, cause significant parkin_ g and traffic issues, and open the door for additional.supportive housing units, changing the very nature of the RM District. The proposed rezoning would be. entirely for the benefit of the property owner and the proposed Project, and to the detriment of the surrounding properties. Further, the proposed rezoning would not serve the public welfare. While it is true that the Project would serve to- address the needs of homeless teens, it would be at the expense. of the businesses and properties in the, RM District. As investment in the RM District is discouraged, the stability of the area and numerous employment opportunities will be lost. Rezoning this small parcel solely for the benefit of this inconsistent use and to the detriment of the surrounding uses constitutes illegal spot- zoning and should not be approved by the City Council. 3. The City's Rushed Efforts to Support the Beacon Project Has Resulted in Legal Errors and Missteps. As we have outlined in our attached correspondence, dated July 22, 2014, and August 12, 2014, the City has made a number of procedural and legal errors in its rush to approve the Project. (Exhibits A; B.) If the City moves forward with approval of the Project, these errors would include a failure to comply with Minnesota law governing the adoption of Comp Plan amendments and the procedure for subsequent zoning amendments. Moreover, rezoning the property as proposed would conflict with the City Code governing the adoption of zoning amendments under Section 36 -216, and PUD requirements under Section 36 -254. And, as proposed, the PUD would meet neither the purpose nor the intent of Section 36 -253. 4. The City's Procedure for Reviewing the Project Has Been So Procedurally Tainted as to Call the Entire Process Into Question. The rushed nature of the Project application has raised.concerns about the City's process for reviewing the Project. This includes concerns about compliance with disclosure requirements of the Planning Commission and the nature of Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council. a. The Planning Commission Members Failed to Divulge the Nature of Ex Parte Communications with Beacon Supporters, Contrary to Planning Commission Bylaws. Mayor Hovland and Council Members August 29, 2014 Page 5 Following the City Planning Commission meeting on July 23, 2014, Beacon held a political rally on the front steps of City Hall. During the rally, certain speakers openly stated that they had been in private conversations with Planning Commission members regarding the Beacon Project. Section 12(A)4 of the Planning Commission's By -Laws, requires that any Planning Commission member shall divulge the occurrence and substance of any such communication on the record at the commencement of the public hearing to which such communication pertains. At the August 13, 2014 Planning Commission meeting, none of the Planning Commissioners stated on the record the existence or substance of such ex parte communications prior to their votes on the Beacon Project. We strongly believe that the Planning Commission members have failed to disclose ex parte communications with Project supporters, and the failure to do so has tainted the process and called into question the actions of the Planning Commission on the Project at its August 13, 2014 meeting. b. An CoMprehensive Plan Amendment that Deviates from the Proposed Amendment Language that was Sent Out for Public Review Warrants a Renewed Analysis and Review by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission has provided the City Council with two recommendations arising out of the August 13, 2014 Planning Commission meeting, with at least one Planning Commission member lamenting that there was not enough time to evaluate the effects of the language. The first recommendation was to not approve the amendment to the Comp Plan to allow affordable housing in the RM District as proposed in the staff report. This negative recommendation was motivated by the Planning Commission members' conclusions that the affordable housing language was not appropriate, was poorly defined, and was bad policy. The subsequent recommendation reflected the City's approach to find a way to approve the Project at any and all costs and consisted of a recommendation for the City Council to "consider amending the Comp Plan by incorporating some guidelines or requirements that would allow this type of residential facility to occur in the RMD." If the City Council does heed the advice of the Planning Commission and abandons the affordable housing language, which we encourage, any subsequent Comp Plan amendment language should be given a full and comprehensive review by staff, the public, and the Planning Commission. If, however, the City Council were to attempt to develop new Comp Plan language at its September 2, 2014 meeting, solely to allow the Project to move forward, that would open the RM District broadly to supportive housing uses, with no definitions of supportive housing anywhere in the City Code, we would strongly oppose any such language so hastily developed. We urge that any new proposed Comp Plan amendment language receives a full review by staff, the public, and the City Planning Commission prior to any such adoption by the City Council. 5. The Project is Not Economically Viable and Project Financing Should be Demonstrated Before Any City Council Approvals. We strongly encourage the City to evaluate the economic viability of the Project. As proposed, the Project will cost $258,000 per unit. Beacon contends that the $258,000 per unit price tag is below the average cost for such a studio apartment unit in the metropolitan area. Beacon's claims cannot be supported by any such information from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. We strongly believe that Beacon does not have the necessary financing for thus $10 million Project at the current location and we discourage the City Council from approving the Project at the proposed location, as Mayor Hovland and Council Members August 29, 2014 Page 6 the City would never entertain such significant rezoning for a private developer, absent some demonstration of financing and project viability. If the City continues forward and hastily approves the Project with no demonstrated financing, it may likely result in an unusable and moribund property in the center of the RM District rezoned for supportive housing uses, which will then allow any other supportive housing project to acquire the site and bring a supportive housing use that was never intended by the City Council. At a minimum, we encourage the City Council to either delay rezoning until Beacon can demonstrate adequate financing for the Project, or find an alternative site at a lower cost in the City. 6. If the City Council Seeks to Allow Additional Affordable or Supportive Housing Uses in the City, a Thoughtful Planning and Zoning Analysis is Necessary. In its rush to support the Beacon Project, the City has failed to even define the terms "specialty housing," as was initially proposed by planning staff in April 2014, "affordable housing," or "supportive housing," as some Planning Commission members have discussed. Amending the Comp Plan to permit such a use, particularly in a district intended for medical and health- related technologies, warrants far more specificity that has been proposed. Affordable housing and supportive housing are far broader terms than the Project currently proposed and if the City Council adopts a Comp Plan amendment without a comprehensive review of the terms, the result could likely be a broad range of unintended supportive housing uses in the RM District. If the City seeks to attract supportive housing uses such as the Project to the City, it should use a deliberate and thoughtful approach, not the piecemeal approach currently contemplated. Allowing the Project to move forward without understanding the future land use and zoning impacts to the RM District is not good planning policy. 7. The City -Owned Former Public Works Site Provides an Opportunity For the City to Allow For Supportive Housing without Damaging the Zoning Integrity of the RNI District. The City has alternative locations that are far more appropriate and suited for the proposed Project. The City-owned former public works site "Grandview District" presents a well - suited opportunity to integrate supportive housing use into a larger mixed use project. (Exhibit C.) This would give the City an opportunity to thoughtfully integrate the use into a master - planned development with ample adjacent employment and transit amenities. Pursuing this alternative would also allow the City to both pursue supportive housing and preserve the zoning integrity of the RM District. We strongly encourage the City Council to seriously consider this approach if the intent is to support the Beacon Project somewhere within the City. We urge the City Council to deny the proposed Comp Plan Amendment and PUD rezoning application for the Project. It is apparent that in the City's efforts to support the Beacon Project, and to meet certain state and regional funding deadlines for the Project, that Beacon's application has been rushed through the process with many errors along the way. The community deserves a thoughtful and comprehensive analysis of the proposed Comp Plan amendment and Rezoning and the City should not bypass such a review simply to accommodate the wishes of a single applicant. The City Council can preserve the zoning integrity of the RM District and encourage significant Mayor Hovland and Council Members August 29, 2014 Page 7 future investment and development in the RM District while utilizing City-owned land to allow the Beacon Project to be successfully completed in Edina. We urge the City Council to provide that kind of strong leadership and create a great outcome for the City's future. If you have any questions about this letter or the information above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, C� Robert C. Long, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lind en Ltd. Direct Dial: 952- 896 -3232 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1779 Email: rlong0larkinhoffinan.com 48514554 -1405, v. 2 Larkin. Hoffman ATTORNEYS July 22, 2014 Commission Chair Kevin Staunton Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Vice Chair Michael Platterer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Claudia Carr Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Arlene Forrest Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Susan Lee Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 EXHIBIT A larldn Ho$'inan Daly & Lindgren Ltd, 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431.1194 c E N E R AL: 952.835 -3800 FAX; 952 -819_6 -- 333 31,3 WED: www.larldnhoffman.corn Commission Member Jo Ann Olsen Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Ken Potts Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Nancy Scherer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Michael Schroeder Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Re: Proposed Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project: 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Our File No. 23193 -02 Dear Chair Staunton and Planning Commission Members: We represent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, P.A. ( "ADCI ") and Advanced Skin Therapeutics, both of which are adjacent property owners to the proposed supportive housing project for homeless teens at 3330 West 66th Street in Edina. Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative ( "Beacon ") has requested an amendment to Edina's Comprehensive Plan and the rezoning of 3330 66th Street West to allow for a proposed multi- Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 2 family, supportive housing project for homeless teens. We submit this letter in opposition to Beacon's requested amendments. We applaud and support the City's goal of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. We also support the City's search for a suitable location for a supportive housing project for homeless teens in the City of Edina. However, as outlined below, there are serious concerns and reasons to oppose the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and re- zoning needed for the project to be built at 3330 66th Street West. Beacon's proposed housing project has been identified by the applicant as simply an affordable housing apartment building for homeless teens or as the Planning Commission's Hearing Notice states, "39 units of small studio apartments." In reality, this is a multi- family supportive housing project for homeless teems that is subject to the state and local regulatory and licensing requirements governing lodging establishments offering supportive services. The proposed amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and rezoning request raise several separate legal and policy issues that warrant the City's attention and should compel the Planning Commission to recommend denial of the requested Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments needed for the proposed Beacon project. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Beacon's request to rezone 3330 66th Street West for their supportive housing project requires an amendment to Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the City's Zoning Code have several legal problems. a. Vague Definition of Affordable Housing, The first legal issue is in the language of the proposed amendment including a change in the Comprehensive Plan to allow for "affordable housing" in the Regional Medical District without clearly defining what constitutes "affordable housing." This vague and unclear definition of "affordable housing" will raise future legal challenges for the Planning Commission and the City in addressing future proposals for affordable supportive housing projects within the City. Lacking a clear definition of "affordable housing" and without a clearer definition of "supportive housing" in the City Code, future applicants will be able to take advantage of this broad, vague definition of affordable housing and propose any kind of affordable supportive housing projects anywhere in the Medical District or elsewhere in the City zoned for multi - family housing. If the Regional Medical District is re-zoned to allow for multi - family affordable supportive housing, the City will be unable to limit other similar proposals in the future such as multi=family supportive housing that is not for homeless teens but instead, for homeless adults or other special needs groups requiring "supportive services." Once the City makes an exception for the Beacon supportive housing'project, it will be unable to deny proposals for other similar supportive housing projects elsewhere in the City. Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 3 b. The Beacon Project is a Lodging Establishment with Supportive Services The next issue lies in the divide between what the project has been labeled by Beacon and its actual use and operation. While Beacon labels the proposal as an affordable 39 -unit apartment building for homeless teens, it also explains in its Explanation of Request and Description of Project that the housing is to be a supportive housing project that provides supportive services to homeless teens. Beacon states the project: is supportive, affordable housing for young adults who have experienced homelessness. The goal is to_support the tenants as they learn to live independently and develop their skills to be financially independent — thereby ending the cycle of homelessness. The building will be staffed by specialists serving homeless young adults. Our supportive service approach is also designed to create a sense of belonging and place for residents and to foster healthy relationships between youth and caring adults with professional training and skills, This definition is not only in the Explanation of Request and Description but incorporated by reference into the proposed zoning ordinance amendment § 36- 494(c) as set forth in the Planning Commission staff report. Despite the misleading label of an affordable housing project, the proposal is actually a "Lodging Establishment" that provides "supportive services" to young adults as defined in the Edina City Code ( "City Code ") and Minnesota Statutes, and as such is subject to those regulatory and licensing requirements. The City Code makes clear that Minnesota Statutes § §157.15 and 157.17 are incorporated by reference. See City Code, § 20 -387, Additionally, City Code, § 20 -384 states that a "[h]otel, lodging establishment and boarding establishment are as defined in Minn. Stats. § 157.15." Therefore; Minn. Stat. §§ 157.15 and 157.17 have been made a part of the City Code itself. Minn. Stat. § 157.15(8) defines a lodging establishment as: [A] building, structure, enclosure, or any part thereof used as, maintained as, advertised as, or held out to be a place where sleeping accommodations are furnished to the public as regular roomers, for periods of one week or more, and having five or more beds to let to the public. The Beacon proposal involves 39 separate units for rent to young adults from. the public as regular roomers who are seeking long -term permanent housing elsewhere as they end their homelessness. A lodging establishment is distinguished from a hotel or motel where accommodations are for periods of less than week. Minn. Stat. § 157.15(7). Applying the details of the Beacon project to the statute results in a clear understanding that it is a lodging establishment. Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 4 The next applicable statute is Minn. Stat. § 157.17(1) which defines "supportive services" as follows: Supportive services means the provision of supervision and minimal assistance with independent living skills such as social and recreational opportunities, assistance with transportation, arranging for meetings and appointments, and arranging for medical and social services. Supportive services also include providing reminders to residents to take medications that are self - administered or providing storage for medications if requested. . By Beacon's own admission, this is an affordable housing project providing "supportive services" to homeless teens. According to the Explanation of Request and Description of Project, the Beacon building will "be staffed by specialists serving homeless young adults." The goal is to "support the tenants as they learn to live independently and develop their skills to be financially independent." The project will have a "supportive service approach." Again, a reasonable application of the facts to the law leads to the conclusion that the Beacon project provides "supportive services." As a lodging establishment providing supportive services, the project requires a license to operate pursuant to City Code,.§ 20 -385 and Minn. Stat. § I57.17. Even if the.proposal did not provide supportive.services, it would still require a license as a lodging establishment under Code, § 20 -385: A lodging establishment providing supportive services is very different than simply an affordable housing apartment building for homeless teens. That is why the State of Minnesota and City of Edina, along with other neighboring cities, have imposed strict licensing and zoning requirements on lodging establishments and other housing establishments providing supportive services. The applicant's label of the project as simply affordable housing for homeless teens is very misleading and it is crucial that this lodging establishment providing supportive services be treated under the City Code and State law for what it is rather'than the label an applicant uses. C. Inconsistency Within the CiV Code Another legal concern associated with the Beacon proposal is the inconsistency within the City Code, as it relates to these larger supportive housing projects. City Code, § 20 -384 defines a boarding and lodging establishment as "an establishment which includes boarding and lodging for five or more regular boarders, but no more than ten regular boarders, for periods of one week or more." But, within the exact same section, the Code states that "[h]otel, lodging establishment and boarding establishment are as defined in Minn. Stats. § 157.15." Furthermore, Code, '§ 20- 387 specifically incorporates by reference the State of Minnesota definition of a lodging establishment found in Minn. Stat. § 157.15, which contains no upper limit on the number of boarders. The City Code is inconsistent and in conflict with the State statutes in this area and amendments to the City Code should be made to address these inconsistencies and conflicts. Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 5 Before the City grants a request for amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and City Code allowing for a lodging establishment that provides supportive services in the Medical District, it should take a step back and consider the consequences. The City Code should be clarified to identify what specifications identify a lodging establishment, supportive services housing project, group home, or other similar type of supportive housing project. Amending the Comprehensive Plan for an applicant prior to these clarifications within the City Code will inhibit the City's ability to address these needed zoning changes. d. Bad Zoning Precedent for the City If the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and re- zoning is approved, it will be legally impossible for the City to distinguish this current Beacon supportive housing project from other future supportive housing projects such as those intended for homeless adult males, or other adults requiring supportive services such as chemical dependency or mental health services. The City is not able to rezone a location for a type of supportive services for a group that they agree,with but then refuse to rezone a location for a type of supportive service or population group with which they disagree. e. ' Needed Changes to the City's Zoning Code Cities in the metropolitan area have dealt with similar proposed supportive housing projects and have found that certain special zoning and regulations are appropriate and necessary for these types of supportive housing projects, which differ substantially and are treated differently from regular affordable housing projects which do not provide on -site supportive services. Cities such as Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park specifically define these projects that provide supportive services and each city lays out zoning requirements for the operation and location of such supportive housing projects. The City of Minneapolis, for example, adopted requirements in Chapter 536 defining supportive housing projects, like Beacon's, as community residential facilities or supportive housing projects. (See attached Minneapolis Zoning Ordinance.) Minneapolis determined strict zoning requirements limiting the zones in which community residential facilities or supportive housing may be developed. Minneapolis further imposes licensing requirements and distance requirements from other supportive housing or community residential facilities. The Edina City Code should be updated to include new provisions governing the zoning and siting of larger community residential facilities and supportive housing projects like Beacon's before any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or City Code are adopted allowing such supportive. housing projects in areas of the City where they were previously not allowed, such as the Medical District. MORATORIUM ON LAND USE CHANGES FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROJECTS Since the City Code does not adequately address the zoning distinctions and definitions of supportive housing projects and lodging establishments, we propose that the City adopt a moratorium on larid use changes related to supportive housing projects, including the current Planning Commission Members July 22, 2014 Page 6 Beacon proposal, so as to consider the inconsistencies of Edina's City Code and fashion regulations that best serve the needs of Edina b` adopting some of the zoning provisions being used by neighboring cities to regulate group homes, community residential facilities ;;'su p portive housing projects and lodging establishments. CONCLUSION For all the reasons stated above, we respectfully request the Edina Planning Commission to deny, Beacon's request for an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan,and re- zoning for the. property at 3330 West 66th Street. We further recommend that the Planning Commission and the City establish a moratorium on future land use changes relating to supportive housing projects until the City's Zoning Code can be studied and updated to better address these types of special supportive housing projects. Sincerely, q4� Robert C. Long, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lind en Ltd, Direct Dial: 952496 -3232 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1779 Email: dong@a.larkinhoffman.com 4819 -4124 -8412, v. I EXHIBIT B Larkin Homan ATTORNEYS August 12, 201.4. _ Commission Chair Kevin Staunton Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th -St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Vice Chair Michael Platterer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Claudia Carr Edina Planning Commission 4801 W., 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Arlene Forrest Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Susan Lee Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAU 952 - 835 -3800 FAX: 952 -896 -3333 WEB:' www..larldnhoffi'nan.com Commission Member Jo Ann Olsen Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Ken Potts Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th. St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Nancy Scherer Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Commission Member Michael Schroeder Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Re: Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project, 3330 West 66th Street, Edina; MN (the "Project ") Opposition to Request for Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Re- Zoning Our File No. 23193 -02 Dear Chair Staunton and Planning Commission Members: We represent Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, P.A. and Advanced Skin Therapeutics. While we applaud and support the City's commitment to finding a site in Edina for supportive housing for homeless teens, we are concerned that the City's efforts to support the Project at the proposed location have: 1) resulted in several procedural and legal errors, which continue to mount as the Project is rapidly pushed forward; and 2) disregarded the concerns of existing long -time landowners' who have invested significant resources in the area. The choice of location must be a Edina Planning Commission Page 2 caref illy'selected instead of forcing this Project into a location that will cause significant problems for adjacent landowners, the district at large, and the City as a whole. This letter supplements our previous lettei.'dated July 22, 2014 (Exhibit 1) as well as the attached adjacent. landowners' letters (Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). In addition to the.previously addressed issues, there are several additional legal concerns that the Planning Commission and the City Council should consider. 1. The Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cannot Take Effect Until It Is Approved By The City Council, Given A 60 -Day Review Period And Approval By The Metropolitan Council. Under Minnesota Statute, the City cannot implement any - measures that would allow development or re- zoning in a manner which conflicts with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Any changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council before the proposed amendment can go into effect and before any re- zoning can be allowed. Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan must first be properly amended, then, and only then, can the City Council consider re- zoning. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.355 and Minn. Stat. § 473.864(2), the City Council must submit any amendment to a City's Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review. Minn. Stat. § 473.854 grants the Metropolitan Council the authority to "adopt guidelines and procedures" relating to Comprehensive Plan amendments. This procedure is specifically required when there is a need to change a land use designation to allow a proposed development. (see Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook, Exhibit 7). Before submitting the amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review, the City is required to obtain Planning. Commission and City Council approval and provide adjacent governmental units and affected school districts up to 60 days to review and comment on the amendment. Only upon completion of those steps may the City submit a proposed amendment for review to the Metropolitan Council. Once submitted, the Metropolitan Council has 60 to 120 days to review.the application for compatibility and conformity with the metropolitan system plans. Minn. Stat. § 473.175. The City must receive approval from the Metropolitan Council before the City can effect any changes. Id. The City has not yet followed, or indicated that it intends to follow, this required procedure for the proposed amendment. Under state law, the City Council must first approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment by a 2/3 majority vote following a hearing with proper notice. The City Council must then provide the 60 review period. After the review period, the City Council must submit the amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review. Only if the Metropolitan Council approves the amendment, can the City consider re- zoning the parcel for the Project. The City cannot bypass state mandated requirements to amend the Comprehensive Plan or enact any'action that conflicts with the existing Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Proposed Re- Zoning Cannot Be Considered Until The City's Comprehensive Plan Has Been Properly Amended. Minn. Stat. § 473.865 confirms that "[a] local governmental unit shall not adopt any official control or fiscal device which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan or which permits activity in conflict Edina Planning Commission Page 3 with metropolitan system plans." Minn. Stat. § 473.852 defines "official controls" to include zoning ordinances. The proposed re- zoning for the Project is an official control in direct contradiction to the City's Comprehensive Plan and cannot be considered until the City follows the state- mandated procedures to amend the Comprehensive Plan as described above. An approval to re -zone for the Project in conflict with the City's current Comprehensive Plan and prior to the proper approval of the proposed amendment violates Minnesota,law. The City cannot simultaneously, pass a Comprehensive Plan amendment and re- zoning proposal for the Project as the re- zoning conflicts with the existing Comprehensive Plan. Instead, the Comprehensive Plan amendment must be completed and take effect prior to the consideration of a re- zoning proposal. The Planning Commission should not recommend approval of the re- zoning required for the Project as the re- zoning, proposal is in conflict with the City's current Comprehensive Plan and would be in violation of Minnesota law. 3. The Proposed Re- Zoning Does Not Meet The City Code's Re- Zoning Requirements. The City Code sets forth. factors to be considered by the Commission in determining whether. to recommend re- zoning. Section 36 -216 of the Code provides that the Commission must make a favorable finding that the proposed re- zoning: (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan; (2) Is consistent with the preliminary site plan as approved and modified by the council and contains the council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the final site plan; (3) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; (4) Will not result in an overly intensive land use; (5) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; (6) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of-this Code; and (7) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features Proper application 'and consideration of these factors requires a denial of the proposed re- zoning for the Project. a. ' The proposed re- zoning , is in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed re- zoning for the Project is clearly in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the land on which the Project would be located as the Regional Medical District. The Regional Medical District is required to be used for medical- related and Edina Planning Commission Page 4 senior housing uses. The proposed use is supportive housing for homeless teens which does not remotely relate to the designated uses: b. The proposed re- zoning will.be detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposed re- zoning for the Project will allow a supportive housing project in the Regional Medical District. This will cause' an erosion of the State's premier medical district, loss of local investment, discouragement of future investments, and a decreased tax base. Advanced Dermatology & Cosmetic Institute, a prime medical facility in Minnesota, has already delayed a $150,000 expansion project due to the anticipated effects if the proposed re- zoning is approved. Further detrimental impacts to surrounding property owners are detailed in our letter dated July 22, 2014 as well as adjacent landowner letters. (Exhibits 1-6). C. The proposed re- zoning will result in undue traffic coneestion and traffic hazards. The proposed re- zoning for the Project will result in significant traffic congestion and traffic hazards in the area. While it has been contended that the traffic and parking will not be negatively impacted, the SPACK study inadequately addresses the situation. The comparison to Beacon's Minneapolis projects is inadequate to predict the traffic and parking effects of Beacon's Edina proposal. Additionally, the location on a centrally located primary comer on one of only two north - south arteries through the Regional Medical District will cause traffic congestion and issues with access and visibility. Further, the Project requires a parking variance of 19 spaces. The deficiency in the proposed parking, ,along with a lack of on- street parking, will create a conflict with neighboring properties, who maintain parking, for customers and employees. d. The proposed re- zoning does not conform to the Code. 0. The proposed re- zoning to include a supportive housing project in the Regional Medical District does not conform the provisions of Chapter 36 of the City Code or other applicable provisions such as those governing the implementation of a Planned Development Unit ( "PUD'D, as discussed below. The proposed re- zoning is also inconsistent with the Regional Medical District and the Comprehensive Plan generally, as discussed above. e. The proposed re- zoning does not provide a proper relationship between the proposed improvements and existing structures. The proposed re= zoning required for the Project does not maintain a proper relationship with the existing structures in the Regional Medical District. Supportive housing is not a permitted use within this district devoted to health - related uses. Even with an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, supportive housing would detrimentally affect the existing surrounding businesses which located in the area to be part of a premier medical office center. Eroding the purpose of the District erodes the integrity of the District. The proposed re- zoning for the Project fails to meet the requirements of the City Code. Therefore, the Commission should not recommend approval to the City Council. Edina Planning Commission Page 5 4. The Proposed Re- Zoning Does Not Meet The City's PUD Requirements. The City Code sets out specific requirements and considerations in zoning a Planned Unit Development ( "PUD "). Section 36 -254 of the Code makes clear that to be eligible for a PUD all development should be in compliance with the following: (1) Where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one land use in the comprehensive plan, the city may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the city council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this chapter and the comprehensive plan; (2) Any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted, provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this chapter and the comprehensive plan; (3) Permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the comprehensive plan; and (4) The setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in subsection (b)(1) of this section. The proposed re- zoning required for the Project fails to meet these requirements. a. The proposed re-zoning is not appropriate to achieve the pmoses of and is inconsistent with Chapter 36 or the Comprehensive Plan. It is clear that despite how the Project has been characterized, it is the development of supportive housing. The PUD proposed language does not include a supportive housing use. Instead, the proposed PUD simply requests use for affordable housing. In order to properly zone this property for the proposed use, the proposed PUD would need to allow multi- family use, affordable housing use, and supportive housing use. Even if the PUD is considered to involve a single land use type, neither the applicable supportive housing nor the misleading affordable housing use is consistent with the objectives of Chapter 36 or the Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed parking, setback regulations, building g overage and floor area do not conform to the most closely related conventional zonin dig strict. The Project does not comply with the parking requirements, setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratios of the most closely related conventional zoning district. In addition, the Project fails to meet the parking requirements for the District, requiring a 19 -stall variance. The Project would also need floor area ratio variance. The proposed PUD does not meet the City's requirements and, as such, should not be approved. 5. The Proposed Re- Zoning Does Not Conform To The Purpose And Intent Of PUDs. Section 36 -253 of the.City Code confirms that the purpose and intent of PUDs is to include most or all of the following: (1) Provide for the establishment of planned unit development (PUD) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan; (2) Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, . safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the city; (3) Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian- oriented design and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; (4) Ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; (5) Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; (6) Preserve and enhance site characteristics, including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views and screening; (7) Allow,for mixing of land uses within a development; (8) Encourage a variety of housing types, including affordable housing; and (9) Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing'land uses. The Project does'not meet all, or even most, of these stated purposes. It fails to create or maintain a development pattern that 'is, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Instead, the Project is in conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan and is incompatible with surrounding land uses. In addition, the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is inconsistent with the vision and goals of the Comprehensive Plan, including effective and valued city services, a balance of land uses, and a livable environment with premier schools and safe streets. Instead of supporting Edina Edina Planning Commission Page 7 Public Schools and, maintaining an exemplary.public,education system for the community, the Project has completely disregarded the Montessori school located less than 300 feet away. The Project also does not promote or protect the health,safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, or general welfare of the City. Instead, expanding the scope of the Regional Medical District will discourage investments in the City thereby reducing the economic viability and general welfare of the City. In addition, increased crimewill likely follow the Project. (See commentary from Step by Step Montessori Schools and Minneapolis Police Call Log for service at Beacon's 3710 Nicollet Ave. location, Exhibit 3). Clearly; this will negatively impact the health, safety, and comfort of owners and users of the Regional Medical District. Finally, the intent to maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities will be diminished. The Project requires a:parking variance due to the lack of off - street parking. At the same time, traffic will increase due to the addition of multi - family supportive housing. The intent and purposes of PUDs are not furthered by the Project. Therefore, approval should not be recommended. 6. Approving The Requested Re- Zoning Would Constitute Spot - Zoning In Violation Of Minnesota Law. Minnesota courts have consistently ruled that spot- zoning to benefit a specific project to the detriment of others is prohibited. The Minnesota Supreme Court has determined that the biggest problem with zoning a planned development on a relatively small tract is the,possibility of spot - zoning. The court defined spot - zoning as "reclassification of a small area of land in a manner that is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood for the benefit of the property owner and to the detriment of others." Amcom Corp. v. Eagon, 348 N. W.2d 66, 73 n.6 (Minn. 1984). The Minnesota Court of Appeals explained that spot - zoning is "zoning. changes.. . which establish a use classification inconsistent. with surrounding uses and create an island of nonconforming use within a larger zoned district." Watam Twp. Citizen Alliance v. Benton Cnty. Bd, of Commis, 728 N. W.2d 82, 91 (Minn. App. 2007). The American Law Reports ( "ALR ") provides the following factors to be considered in determining illegal spot- zoning: [W]hether the zoning of the parcel in question is in accordance with a comprehensive plan; whether the zoning of the subject parcel is compatible with the uses in the surrounding area; and whether the zoning of the subject property serves the public welfare or merely confers a discriminatory benefit on the owner of the property. 73 A.L.R. 5th 223. The proposed re- zoning from Planned Office District -1 to a'Planned Development Unit for the specific benefit of the Project and to the detriment of the surrounding property owners would violate Minnesota's prohibition of spot - zoning. First, the parcel to be re -zoned is a small plot of land 39,204 square feet in size. Re- zoning the parcel to allow for the addition of a supportive housing project is not compatible with the surrounding Regional Medical District. The proposed classification would create an island of nonconforming use within the larger Regional Medical District. Edina Planning Commission Page 8 In addition, the Regional Medical District is a premier medical: district in the state. This re- zoning would erode the integri ty of the district, negatively impact ongoing investments, discourage future investments, "diminish the tax base; cause significant parking and traffic issues, and open the door for additional Housing units changing the very nature of"the Regional .Medical District. The landowners within the Regional Medical District confirm that the. proposal is incompatible with their use of the surrounding property. (Exhibits 1 -5). The re- zoning would entirely for the benefit of the property owner and to the detriment of others. Further, the proposed zoning does not serve the public welfare. As investment in the Regional Medical District is discouraged, the stability of the area and numerous employment opportunities will be lost. At the same time, increased crime will likely follow the Project. Clearly, re- zoning this small area solely for the benefit, of this inconsistent use and to the detriment of the surrounding consistent uses constitutes illegal spot - zoning and should not be approved. 7. The City's Continued Efforts To Make This Square Peg Fit Into A Round Hole Demonstrates That The Decision Is Arbitrary. a. City Staff has consistently used an incorrect definition of the Project to justify approval. The Beacon application itself confirms that the Project is a supportive housing project, not just an affordable housing Project as staff reports have repeatedly stated. In its explanation, the application uses the terms "supportive service" and "supportive, affordable housing. Yet, the City Staff in its reports and commentary refer to the Project as "affordable housing" and "39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18 -22) who have experienced homelessness." A supportive housing project is dramatically different than an affordable housing option for young adults who have experienced homelessness, and it has a significantly different effect on adjacent landowners. The State of Minnesota as well as many surrounding cities have experienced and understand this difference and accordingly apply stringent licensing requirements and zoning restrictions on supportive housing which are not applicable to standard affordable housing. b. City Staff has rushed this project forward to receive State and Metropolitan Council Funding. City Staff recommended the Project for Metropolitan Council funding prior to even submitting it to the Planning Commission for approval. In fact, in its submission for Metropolitan Council funding, the Staff also mislabels the proposed re- zoning, failing once again to describe the Project as supportive housing. (Exhibit 8). The City Staffs effort to rush this Project forward for approval has resulted in the failure to follow proper state- mandated procedures for re- zoning. In attempting to rush the process in order to make the Project eligible for State and Metropolitan Council funding, the City Staff combined the re- zoning request and proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment in violation of Minnesota Law. For all the reasons set forth herein and in our letter dated July 22, 2014 (Exhibit 1), and due to the many legal and procedural errors that have been made thus far in this requested re- zoning for the Project, we request that the Planning Commission deny Beacon's request to re -zone the parcel for Edina Planning Commission Page 9 the Project. If the Commission is poised to recommend approval, we request that the Commission postpone a decision until it can adequately address and alleviate the many legal and procedural errors that have tainted the re- zoning process. Absent correction,, these irregularities constitute a denial of due process rights guaranteed to neighboring properties and sufficient legal grounds to invalidate any recommendation or approval of the proposed re- zoning for the Project. Sincerely, G Robert C. Long, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren td. Direct Dial: 952- 896 -3232 Direct Fax: 952- 842 -1779 Email: rlong(@Iarkinhoffinan.com 4835 -5415 -2220, v. 2 t 1%ruyn rm r+ City of Edina, Minnesota } @ c GrandView Phase 1 Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue % �y Request for Interest for Development Partner The City of Edina has a rich history of innovative developments that have become national models for public/private partnerships. We are looking for a development partner to collaborate with us to create Edina's next great neighborhood amenity. Objective The City of Edina is seeking a partner with real estate development expertise and experience to collaborate in implementing the GrandView District Development Framework. As Phase I in the implementation process, this partner will work with the City to determine public and private uses on a vacant 3.3 -acre parcel (the former Public Works site) in the center of the District and then potentially design and construct the structure(s) that house those uses. The School Bus Garage at 5220 Eden Avenue is potentially Phase 2 in the redevelopment process. This parcel is wholly owned by Edina Independent School District 273. Any redevelopment planning for this parcel will take place in partnership with District 273 in a separate process unrelated to this Request for Interest It is important to the City that all sites be developed in a manner that innovatively responds to the needs of the community and is successful in the marketplace. Background In 2010, the City initiated a community-based small area guide plan process for the GrandView District, led by residents, business and property owners, including a volunteer team of architects, landscape architects, and urban planners (all Edina residents). The innovative, collaborative and intensive process (10 meetings in 20 days) resulted in the unanimous approval of seven Guiding Principles for redevelopment of the GrandView District ° ? } a- MAM It is important to the City that all sites be developed in a manner that innovatively responds to the needs of the community and is successful in the marketplace. Background In 2010, the City initiated a community-based small area guide plan process for the GrandView District, led by residents, business and property owners, including a volunteer team of architects, landscape architects, and urban planners (all Edina residents). The innovative, collaborative and intensive process (10 meetings in 20 days) resulted in the unanimous approval of seven Guiding Principles for redevelopment of the GrandView District Grandview Guiding Principles 1. Leverage publicly -owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. 2. Enhance the District's economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. 4. Design for the present and future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life -filled place. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina's innovative development heritage. In April of 2012, with the help of a $100,000 Met Council Livable Communities grant, the City completed the second citizen -led phase of the process resulting in the unanimous City Council adoption of the GrandView District Development Framework. The Framework (available at www.edinamn.gov) provides a vision for how to bring the Guiding Principles to life. In the Grandview District, the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, add value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. This amenity, the Grandview Commons, is envisioned to include a community building, public green, and new street (Grandview Crossing). Additional elements potentially envisioned for the site include a Metro Transit park and ride and possibly multi - family housing. In keeping with the spirit of the Framework, all uses must provide for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and adhere to best practices with regard to environmental sustainability. In addition, development must consider and should preserve future transit use of the adjoining rail line. Additional visions for the site and the district is found in the Framework. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 2 Collaborative Process The City anticipates a multi -stage process to collaborate with a potential Development Partner to achieve the vision outlined for the former Public Works site in the Framework. Stage 1: Partner Selection Outcome: City The City will review letters of interest and select prospective partners to announces partner interview. After conducting interviews on September 2, 2014, the City will on September 16, select a "tentative" Development Partner. 1 2014. Stage 2: • Outcome: Parties The City and the Development Partner will work together to create a enter into a formal transparent and engaging process to identify feasible alternatives to re-use and agreement to redevelop the vacant site. This process will include extensive public input, execute the process including City commissions, stakeholder groups, neighbors and the general on November 18, public. Additional planning/market studies and obligations of each party will be 2014. identified. Milestones and deadlines will be established. Stage 3: Alternative Development go utcome: The Development Partner and the City will collaborate to generate alternative Development scenarios for development that align with the goals of the Framework and the Partner will deliver needs of the community and the marketplace. Each scenario will demonstrate 2-4 alternatives for all aspects of project feasibility, including but not limited to: the re -use of the site • General development plan that indicates public and , private uses, by March 31, 2015. approximate building size and height, outdoor open spaces, circulation These alternatives patterns within and adjacent to the site and any off -site infrastructure will be forwarded to requirements; City Council on • Economic model / pro -forma that demonstrates the financial feasibility April 7, 2015. including revenues and expenses for both capital construction and long -term operations; and • Phasing plan that summarizes the timing and sequencing of the public and private elements at the site. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 Outcome: Summary provided to Council on May 19, 2015. • Each of the alternative scenarios will be made available to the public for evaluation and feedback. Public input and opinions will be collected and summarized to help inform the City Council. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 ry selects preferred scenario on June 2, 2015 and authorizes execution with the Development Partner. Selection Stage 5: - • Scenario The City Council will determine which of the alternative scenarios, if any, is in the best interests of the community. After selection, the City and the Development Partner will enter into an exclusive partnership and negotiate full terms of a Redevelopment Agreement under which the preferred scenario will be executed. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 Submission Requirements Interested entities (whether an individual, company, or team) should submit a Letter of Interest that includes the following information: 1) Name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address of the primary contact person; 2) The names and professional backgrounds of all team members who are integral to the project; 3) A general statement of why the team is interested in this opportunity, including the team perspective of the community vision outlined in the Grandview Development Framework and preliminary thoughts on how development of the site can serve as a catalyst for private development of the surrounding parts of the District; 4) Three examples of experiences with the one or more of the following attributes: civic/community uses, mixture of public and private uses, public/private partnerships, multi - modal transportation elements, environmental sustainability or innovate project financing; 5) Two examples of projects shaped with extensive public input; 6) Preliminary work plan that outlines the critical elements and milestones anticipated when working with the City to advance from "vision" to "reality'; and 7) Any other information that is critical to the City's ability to evaluate the merits of the team. Respondents are encouraged to be thorough, yet concise. References to online project examples are encouraged. Letters of Interest must be limited to 10- pages. Submission is due by 4:30pm on Monday, August 11, 2014. The Letter of Interest must be submitted in electronic format with 10 printed hard copies delivered to: City of Edina 4501 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager bneuendorKa7edinamn.gov Selection All complete submittals received prior to the deadline will be evaluated by an ad -hoc selection team comprised of City staff likely to be engaged in the development planning process. Submittals will be evaluated on past experience, professional capabilities and ability to collaboratively work in partnership with the City to successfully create innovative development alternatives for the site. The City will determine which responders, if any, will be invited to interview. Selected responders will be invited to give in- person presentations to the City Council on Tuesday September 2, 2014 at 5:00 PM. Based on the Letter of Interest and in- person interviews, the City Council anticipates selecting a "tentative development partner" to explore the feasible alternatives for the site on September 16, 2014. Development planning is anticipated to begin immediately thereafter. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 KFI for Development Partner Page 4 Terms This is a request for Letters of Interest and in no way obligates the responder to enter into a relationship with the City. Nor does this request obligate the City to enter into a relationship with any entity that responds, nor does it limit or restrict the City's right to enter into a relationship with any entity that does not respond to this request. In its sole discretion, the City may pursue discussions with one or more entities responding to this request, or none at all. The City further reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to cancel this Request for Letters of Interest at any time for any reason. All costs associated with responding to this request will be solely at the responder's expense. Additional Information In addition to the Development Framework, the City has commissioned several studies that may inform the response to this Request for Interest. These documents include: environmental studies, Community Facility Inventory, Edina Resident Survey and preliminary traffic and underground infrastructure studies. A finding of TIF eligibility was also completed for the site. These documents are available at www.edinamn.gov /grandview. Questions about this Request for Interest can be directed to Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager at 952 - 826 -0407 or bneuendorfAedinamn.gov. r 7. •!y • WI..4e��" City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 5 Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night; it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Name Address ICI )� &m� Dear Edina City Councilmember, The city of Edina can help young people find stable housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely p Name pez/ �A (� v Address r Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 . Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 8.49 postage required 8.49 required Dear Edina City Councilmember, Pose required The city of Edina can help young people find stable J housing and end homelessness. On any given night, it is estimated that between 200 and 300 youth are homeless in the suburbs of Hennepin County. 66 West is affordable and supportive housing which will serve approximately 39 youth and young adults. Please help suburban youth experiencing homelessness by supporting this project. Sincerely, Edina. City Council 4801 West 50th Street Name �1 Edina, MN 55424 Address Heather Braniain From: Therese Kakalios <tkakalios @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 201410:55 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett12 @comcast.9et, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: James Kakalios; Camille Nash Subject: 66 West Project Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members, I am writing to voice my full support for the proposed Beacon 66 West project. Please allow me to share two stories: Last summer, my very gregarious and sociable teenage son brought home a group of four kids to spend a couple afternoon hours at our home. He had met them while bicycling around Minneapolis.These teens could have been your children or mine. Thinking that he was somehow protecting them, he did not share with-me until later that he had just met them and that they were homeless. We never saw them again. Several summers ago,my sister Camille Nash (6920 Hillcrest Lane) was walking her dog in Rosland Park when she spotted a teenage boy sitting on a bench. Very early the following morning, Camille and her husband once again saw the boy sitting on the same bench. Alarmed, she said "Have you been here all night ? ". The answer was "yes ". The opponents who fear the 66 West Project need to realize that these young and vulnerable people are already in our community. The project does not create a problem. Rather, it addresses a problem that already exists and can have a profoundly good effect on the young lives at stake. I drove past the proposed location and was struck by how ideal the site seemed. These young people are not "problems" that will go away if we turn our heads. Rather, I believe that our society will pay a far larger price in the end. We in Edina have a moral, ethical and practical obligation to address this problems. My son later said "But Mom, what would you have done if you had known ". As a community, we now know that this heartbreaking problem exists. Let us not miss this opportunity. A heartfelt thanks to you, Mayor Hovland, and Council Members Bennet, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson for your service to our community. ` Sincerely, Therese Kakalios and James Kakalios 4908 Arden Ave. Edina tkakalios @gmail kakalios@a,umn.edu Heather, Branigin From:, Suzanne Kerwin <skerwin @comcastnet> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:35 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: "Money in Politics" Please forward to all members of Boards and Commissions, Thank you League of Women Voters of Edina Sherri Knuth,` - Policy and Outreach Manager for League of Women Voters Minnesota, will speak on Money in Politics, Saturday, September 20: Sherri Knuth closely' follows developments in campaign finance at the state capitol. She was the primary'author of the state League's recent report titled, 'The Tip of the Iceberg: How Minnesota's Campaign Finance Laws Limit Transparency ". Sherri is a lawyer and she also has a master's degree in Public Affairs from the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of MN. Saturday, September 20 9:30am- Refreshments 10:00- 11.:30am- Program Edina City Hall Sponsored by the League of Women Voters Edina. The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non - partisan political organization that encourages the informed and active participation in government, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. For more information, please visit www.lwvedina.org. 1 4 Heather Braniain From: Suzanne Kerwin <skerwin @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 201411:52 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Suppport the 66 West Apartments Dear Mayor and Council Members, I support the 66 West Apartments for homeless youth. I believe this proposed project will make a very positive difference in young peoples lives, young people that often are unnoticed as they struggle to survive and complete their education. Please vote to approve this project. Sincerely, Suzanne Kerwin .5238 Hollywood Rd. Edina, MN 55436 1 Heather Braniain From: Lisa G. Korslund <lgkorslund @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West - I'm an Edina resident and I support it! Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am writing to express my strong and enthusiastic support for the 66 West Project. It is critical that our community provide housing to fit a range of situations, and 66 West brings a proven program to housing homeless youth. I hope you will vote in support of this project tonight! I reside at 4606 Casco Avenue. Lisa G. Korslund mobile /cell +1612 669 0571 Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA 1 Heather Branigin From: maureen.nalezny @comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 201412:02 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @ comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Cc: ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org Subject: Survival skills, or skills for productive daily living? 66 West Dear Edina City Council Members; I write this morning to add my voice to the many who support the affordable housing answer that 66 West could provide to young people who have no stable home. I apologize for "cutting it close" -- I know your important meeting is tonight, and that soon, you will be heading toward work sessions. I've been laid low by a virus, and have neglected to send my thoughts upward to the Council. I hope you'll take a minute to read this note and to follow the link I've included. I attended both previous meetings conducted by the Planning Commission, and will be there tonight, with green on. Let me say, first, that it does not matter why young people are homeless. What matters is that they are young and inexperienced, panicky, full of anxiety (despite bravado and attitude) and in need of something that wasn't happening in their families or at their homes. In that vulnerable condition, they make uninformed choices without the benefit of caring adults. Left uninterrupted in their blind - leading -blind journeys, they will learn survival skills, certainly. But they will not learn the kinds of skills that will create pathways to productive, responsible futures. Not to mention, happy futures. I have had the privilege, for eight years or so, to be a writer for YouthLink, a downtown organization that has led the way to offering young homeless people the support, skills, resources -- and kindness! — that they deserve and crave. In my work, I have been "the storyteller": the adult who listens to their incredible journeys and then tells the story to donors, ;ommunity neighbors, businesses, and whoever will listen. This link will lead you to YouthLink's website, and to the stories I've written or shaped: hftp://www.youthlinkmn.or-q/cateqory /stories-of-youthlink/ The young people whom I've interviewed are strong, determined, focused, and well aware of mistakes they might have made in their survival -mode ignorance. Their stories are heartbreaking and greatly heartening at the same time. I want to state that I am absolutely positive that the 39 young people who could be housed at 66 West will have graduated from the school of hard knocks. That school may have included sexual abuse, physical abuse, absent parents, angry parents, drug- addicted parents and siblings, neglectful parents, bad advice, self - medication, truancy, hunger, sleeplessness and always, always, fear. When you have no stable place to leave your school books, doesn't it become exhausting to continue in school? When you have no place to lie down, and riding an all -night bus is your best answer, could you concentrate on finding a job? If you have no computer access, how do you apply for a job online? If you want to enroll for county or state benefits or health care, and you've never so much as had an ATM card, how do you do it? If you don't know what you need, how do you find out? That's where our smart, efficient and effective non - profit agencies step in. And that's how young people get connected with apartments like the ones proposed at 66 West. First, they find help. They stop asking their equally - homeless "friends" for help. They hear about an agency like YouthLink. They drop in for food, conversation, and advice. Agencies help them find SAFE places to stay, like temporary shelters. ,enerally, they hate the shelters and want to get away from that kind of living. "hey start to work with a case manager. They begin to feel empowered. The case manager helps them figure out where their goals are, and what their skills are. v � They get help applying for jobs. They practice interviewing. They get help with transportation. They get GED tutoring help, and they graduate. They apply to colleges, with goals and hopes in mind. They get that job. They're accepted into that program. THEN, AND ONLY THEN, are they able to rent one of the apartments offered by Beacon or another organization. Frankly, these young people who are called, by ignorant Edina residents and business owners, "delinquent," "not our kids," "lazy," "takers," and more horrible names, will be remarkably strong and resilient neighbors. Add to their incredible tales of triumph and their strength of character a case manager who works AT THE BUILDING to help them learn, refine their goals and skills, locate resources, solve the problems of adolescence and past sadnesses, and MOVE OUT INTO THE WORLD as contributing adults. So many people can't imagine the plight of young homeless people because, to their credit, they would never consider throwing a child out of the house, or abusing drugs, or selling a child for drug money. That's why the approval of this project requires imagination. It requires information. It requires a readiness to help vulnerable young people to gain strength, and to leave that vulnerability behind. 66 West is NOT a shelter. If it were, kids would be sent there. I promise, they would not voluntarily go. It is NOT a halfway house — the drug problems were in their families, not them. It is NOT a group home or a dorm, where "39 kids together can't possibly turn out well," as one ignorant dissenter stated on August 13. It is hope. A doorway. A key. A toilet. A couch. Running water. A table for doing homework or paying bills. A commitment, by lease, to keep up the premises. And an incredible springboard for kids who have had sadness, hatred, neglect, bad judgment, and bad advise to leap into futures where they can imagine a family of their own. A positive and two -way relationship with other tenants, and maybe even with their parents. A place where their bikes won't be stolen. Help with solving problems that arise because of their inexperience. I can't say it emphatically enough. THEY WOULD BE REMARKABLE NEIGHBORS FOR EVERYONE NEARBY, shining examples of the resurrection of 39 young lives. They will be on their best behavior — better than many kids who have loving homes! -- and they understand what's at risk if they mess up. Please, please -- be as informed as possible about the struggles and journeys of these amazing young people. As one of them, an EMT student, said to me recently, "Hey! Maybe I'll save your life some day!" Thank you for reading this, for your service to our community, and for any openness and imagination you can devote to this most excellent prospect. Sincerely, Maureen Kelly Nalezny Principal, Helper Monkey Communications, LLC 5812 Kellogg Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Maureen Kelly Nalezny, Principal I Helper Monkey Communications I Writer and Creative Consultant 1 5812 Kellogg Ave. I Edina, MN 155424 1952.200.1756 Heather Braniain 'rom: Sue Welna (welavender @aol.com) <welavender @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 201412:22 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonaiinl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net;joshspragudgcidinarealty.com Subject: Support for Beacon Housing Project Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Swenson, Brindle, Bennett and Sprague, We write to ask you to vote in favor of the 66 West Apartments project. In the last 30 years, we have raised a family in Edina and continue to appreciate living here. We believe this initiative to house homeless young adults in safe and stable housing is excellent and support it completely. Please help Edina continue to demonstrate how a caring and responsible community responds when called to act on behalf of some of its most vulnerable citizens. Thank you. Sue and Jim Welna 1 cv9A1r� 0 1138B leas To: City Council Item No. IX. B. From: MJ Lamon, Liaison Human Rights and Relations Commission Date: August 27, 2014 Subject: Human Rights and Relations Commission — Support for Edina Planning Commission Zoning Changes Attachments: Advisory Communication from the Human Rights and Relations Commission Action Requested: None requested. Situation: The Edina Comprehensive Plan has been amended in the past to encompass needs reflective of the changes in our community and its priorities. The increase in homeless youths, their needs and the availability of private non - profit resources has been brought to the City of Edina's attention by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. Background: The Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission met for their regular meeting on August 26, 2014 and discussed the upcoming Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative project. Assessment: It is the mission of the Human Rights and Relations Commission to advocate for the basic human rights and needs of everyone. Enacting the Planning Commission's changes and allowing the 39 unit apartment building is an excellent opportunity to show the City's support for human rights and needs of homeless youth in our community. Recommendation: The Human Rights and Relations Commission, at the August 26, 2014 regular meeting, voted to recommend that the Edina City Council enact the changes from the Edina Planning Commission and take all other actions necessary to support the initiative. Advisory Communication Recommendation to Edina City Council from Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission August 26, 2014 Low income and special needs housing is desirable for diverse, healthy communities; as is business, quality schools, housing for the majority and medical and social services. The Edina Comprehensive Plan has been amended in the past to encompass needs reflective of the changes in'.our community and its priorities. The increase in homeless youths, their needs and the availability of private non - profit resources coupled with vacant real estate within Edina has been brought to the attention of the City, by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. Its plans to convert the TCF Bank Building into a 39 unit apartment building with space for counseling services to assist homeless youth by providing housing, educational resources and job finding services is modeled after successful projects elsewhere in the Twin Cities Area. The sponsor estimates approximately 250 homeless youth live in the Edina - Bloomington - Richfield area. This would be the first special purpose apartment building for this community in the Western suburbs. Accordingly, the EHRRC in its role as the advisor to the City Council on human relations and matters within the scope of its mission: RECOMMENDS AND SUPPORTS the Edina Planning Commission's recommended zoning changes and plan of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative to create a 39 unit apartment building for homeless youth with space for relevant social services directed to such youth with the further recommendation that the City Council enact such changes and take all other actions necessary to support such initiative. MINUTES OF CITY,OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION .COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11'11 V 97 HA7A 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Boettge, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Olson, Spanhake, and Whited. ABSENT Members Bass, lyer, Sierks, Van Dyke. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by memberJanovy and seconded`by member Boettge to;approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motioncarried. - APPROVAL OF'MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF June 19,201 Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to approve the minutes of June 19, 2014. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT - "None. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Living Streets Plan Update Transportation planner Nolan said the policy was approved by City Council on Aug. 13, 2013, and to date, they've completed drafts of Chapters 3 (Living Streets Network) and 4, (Design Guidelines). Input was received from the City Council and the two advisory. groups (staff and the Living Streets Advisory Group). He said the next step is to complete other draft chapters, complete the Sidewalk Map to provide input for future projects and approve the plan this fall. Discussion The street types in the Living Streets plan are the same classification as in the Comprehensive Plan with one added street type: Local Connectors. Most Edina streets are classified as local streets. Some examples of street types and treatment plan are local connector street (sidewalk required on one side); collector street (generally wider, sidewalk required on one side and can have bike lanes); minor arterial street (sidewalk required on both sides and designated bike lanes). The draft Sidewalk Map will be presented to the ETC in August and then to the City Council (it is the same as the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Map, except it was updated to include the Active Routes to School (ARTS) sidewalks and recommendations,from the draft Living Streets Plan). Member Janovy recommended using data to determine sidewalk needs instead of making it a blanket requirement. Regarding bike facilities, planner Nolan said Hennepin County is developing their bike plan and staff discussed waiting for them to complete their plan before doing Edina's plan. A suggestion was made to find a better way of explaining what a road diet is (shrinking the road to calm traffic; e.g. W. 50th between Wooddale and Halifax Avenues). Member Nelson said the plan was well received by City Council at the work session and they seem eager to approve the Sidewalk Map. 1 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Update Planner Nolan clarified that where "PACS Funds" is checked this means a sidewalk is included in the neighborhood reconstruction project that the PACS funds will pay for. Member Olson referenced a sidewalk priority report from 2013 and said it appeared decisions were already made without seeking input from the ETC. Planner Nolan said the sidewalks listed in the draft CIP list are ones that are listed in the referenced 2013 report and thus have been vetted through the ETC. Member Boettge noted that the Cornelia Drive sidewalk was not on the list. She said it is in the ARTS plan and was petitioned for. Planner Nolan said it was not included because it was cost prohibitive. He explained that constructing a sidewalk alone can cost twice as much as when it is included with a street reconstruction project and there was an opportunity to construct this sidewalk a few years ago but residents were not in favor. Construction cost is estimated at $600,000 and the PACS Fund is already budgeted for the next two years. He said it could potentially be added after 2016. Member Janovy recommended revisiting the sidewalk prioritization report that member Olson referenced in order to prioritize which sidewalks are built outside of neighborhood reconstruction areas. Member Olson said the goal of the franchise fees was to eliminate sidewalk assessment but it seems like the PACS Fund is being used in commercial areas, e.g. sidewalk planned by the hospital. Planner Nolan said eliminating sidewalk assessments was the primary reason and that businesses pay into the PACS Fund through a higher franchise fee. He said the sidewalk by the hospital fills in a missing gap. Member Nelson suggested adding a sidewalk on W. 66th between Valley View and France. There is a sidewalk on the north side but most of the properties are on the south side. 2015 Transportation Commission Work Plan Update Vice -chair La Force recommended making work plan suggestions tonight and discussing them next month. Suggestions: 1. Sidewalk Prioritization 2. Living Streets (completion may change what they do in the future) 3. How to attract people to Edina with easy access to Southwest LRT 4. France Avenue Urban Design Items to remove: 5. Standardize intake form for Traffic Safety Requests 1. Grandview Area 2. Coordination with Bike Edina 3. Southwest LRT 4. France Avenue Intersections Improvement Project 5. PACS Program 6. Communications Committee Traffic Safety Committee Report of June 4, 2014 Adam Gildner, 5436 Brookview Ave, addressed the ETC regarding Section B -4, request for stops signs at 55th & Brookview, which was denied. Mr. Gildner said he was in attendance with two neighbors and together, they've had ongoing concerns about the intersection at 55th & Brookview and their recent request for a stop sign was denied for lack of warrants. He said the same happened a few years ago. He said there are high vehicle, bike and pedestrian traffic and asked what other criteria could be used. 2 Alyssa Pankratz, 5429 Brookview Ave, in attendance with Mr. Gildner, said she went through the process in 2010 and yield signs were installed. She said she assumed the intersection would not meet warrants again; however, there are seven school bus stops, they are one block from Arden Park and there are fender - bender accidents not being documented. Dan Katan, 5101 Juanita Ave, addressed the ETC regarding Section A -1, request to keep the intersection of W. 501h St. and Indianola Avenue clear of cars that often block the intersection. Mr. Katan said his primary concern was Indianola north to W. 501h but the same is also true for Arden and Bruce. He passed around photos of a recent accident and said he was concerned it would happen again and did not want to see it repeated three times. He said on W. 50th at St. Stephen's church where 2 lanes merge into one, drivers continue to drive as though the two lanes continue and often they are on their phone or texting. He said staff's recommendation to "move the current sign to the west side of the intersection, and adding orange placards to the sign in order to make it more visible to eastbound drivers on W. 50th St" is not enough. Discussion A -1: Member Janovy said this area would require a traffic study and the budget for the study. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Nelson to recommend a traffic study for W. 50th St. from TH -100 to France Avenue in conjunction with the Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction that is scheduled for 2015. B -1: Regarding the curve, it does not cause a clear view issue and staff did not see a sightline issue. B -2: Member Whited said she recalled another intersection having similar issue and planner Nolan said the 85% speed was 25 mph for the other intersection. B -4: Member Olson said they had two stop signs installed in his neighborhood and speed was greatly reduced. Motion was made by member Olson and seconded by member Boettge to recommend 4 -way stops at 55th & Brookview. Member Spanhake said research shows stop signs do not slow traffic and wondered what else might be going on there. Member Janovy said she recall the City Council saying sidewalk would be helpful in this neighborhood. She would like to find the right solution but is not convinced that stop signs is right. Traffic circles were suggested or other traffic calming measures. Vice -chair La Force said there are four requests for stop signs that were denied and if they recommend that City Council approve this one, why not the other three? Aye: Boettge, Olson Nay: Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Spanhake, Whited Motion failed. Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Janovy to move B -4 to section C for further study. All voted aye. Motion carried. B -5: A reflector on post was suggested. D -1 & D -7: Member Nelson said these are similar. Planner Nolan said Hennepin County also have some concerns and are looking at these areas. Member Boettge said she's noticed a lot of requests for stop signs and the average person is probably not aware that stop signs are not the right solution. She asked if they could develop a questionnaire that would help to inform residents. Developing a standardized intake form will be added to the work plan. Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Whited to forward the July 2, 2014, report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. 3 Member Spanhake said she checked with her department and they thought the W. 60th St & Chowen area would be an ideal capstone project. She will follow up with more detailed information at a later meeting. Updates Student Members - None Bike Edina Working Group— Minutes of June 12, 2014 Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to appoint Mary Zarling to Bike Edina. All voted aye. Motion carried. Discussion on revising City Code 24 -399 to allow bikes in parking lots or parking ramps was postponed until next month. Living Streets Working Group See Living Streets Plan Update above. Communications Committee — None. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Boettge said she attended the pedestrian safety conference that member Spanhake told them about last month. She learned that some pedestrian safety measures do not work if speeds are above 35 mph, 20 -25 mph is better; it is unsafe to put one foot in the crosswalk unless you know for sure the vehicle will stop; most effective is to put your arm out like a waving gesture. Member Spanhake will forward a link to the pedestrian counter measures. Member Nelson asked if planner Nolan knew when W. 66th St. in Richfield was scheduled for reconstruction and the project limits. Planner Nolan will check on this. Regarding Birchcrest B being delayed because the same contractor has multiple other projects, member Nelson asked if staff looked at contractor's capacity. Planner Nolan said there were other issues that caused the delay. STAFF COMMENTS 2014 Proiect Update: • Bredesen Park D Neighborhood Reconstruction — delayed two months because of water main bolts and weather. Same contractor for Birchcrest B and City Council approved delaying this project to 2015. • Countryside F Neighborhood Reconstruction — ready to be paved but had to wait for water to dry out; • Strachauer Park B Neighborhood Reconstruction — only need wear course; • Morningside B Neighborhood Reconstruction —sidewalk being constructed; • Todd Park F Neighborhood Reconstruction —start date is now late -July; • France Avenue Pedestrian Intersection Enhancement — work in the roadway is completed; finishing up median; • Hazelton Road — will remain closed until it is paved in early- August; ITNTwinCities: Planner Nolan said manager Neal recommended forwarding the ETC's advisory communication to the City Council as a regular communication on Aug. 4. Ms. Forrest was notified. Edina To Go: Traffic Safety Requests could be added as early as next month. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. 4 W n Z11riso, itted, retary 5 2/27 Feb's rescheduled meeting; 3/10 Urban Design meeting #4; 3/18 City Council Work Session; F r f #.of Attendance: NAME TERM J * M A M J J A S O N D SM 2127 SM 3/10 S 3118 MeetingsMork 4 ' Sessions ' 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 W n Z11riso, itted, retary 5 2/27 Feb's rescheduled meeting; 3/10 Urban Design meeting #4; 3/18 City Council Work Session; MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday July 10, 2014 7:03 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Glahn, Gubrud, Howard, Kostuch, Rudnicki, Sokol, Waddick, and Zarrin Absent: Bale, Latham, Thompson Late Arrival: Chair Heer, Sierks Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Heer arrived at 7:05p.m. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes. Member Gubrud requested Item VIII F. change "Economy" to "Colony ". Member Gubrud requested Item VIII G. change the last sentence to "reported that all subsidized enhance home energy installs have been completed ". Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the amended Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Glahn to approve the remaining Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comment. Member Sierks arrived at 7:08p.m. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS r` A. Community Solar. Member Sierks said the Subcommittee was trying to get Scott Neal to add Community Solar into Mr. Bintner's work plan. Mr. Bintner suggested writing an Advisory to Council to direct staff to do work. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Gubrud the EEC recommend to Scott Neal to assign a staff person, Ross Bintner if able or others, to spend time helping the Subcommittee that is working on Community Solar to develop more plans and details on the project. Mr. Bintner suggested the EEC Members need to define Community Solar better in order for Scott to make a decision and refers back to writing a Council Advisory. Member Sierks suggested attaching the Subcommittee May minutes that has the project details. Add amendment: As outlined in the last report of the Community Solar Subcommittee (see attachment). Mr. Sierks updated the EEC Members what the Community Solar project included again. The EEC members discussed what the City's staff member's deliverable would be. Mr. Bintner suggested the deliverables would be a Request for Proposal. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Rudnick! the EEC recommend to Scott Neal to assign a staff person, Ross Bintner if able or others, to spend time helping the Subcommittee that is working on Community Solar to develop more plans and details on the project as outlined in the last report of the Community Solar Subcommittee. Motion carried unanimously. B. Workplan. The EEC Members started discussing their 2015 Workplan which is due in October. Chair Heer suggested Reduction of Greenhouse Gases as a main focus. Member Sierks said the actions steps to reduce greenhouses could be find the baseline measurement, reduce it by identifying reductions such as deeper energy cuts in buildings, chapter 10, recycling, and community solar. Chair Heer said the EEC could acknowledge that we're not going to meet the 2015 goals and define what we're going to work on for the 2020 reduction. Member Rudnicki said the EEC needs to be honest about the urgency of the need for the City and Community to create and follow the mandates to reduce greenhouse gases. Member Kostuch suggested having a Work Session with Council to ask them what they want from the EEC and plan a serious effort to reduce greenhouse gases. A work plan item could possibly create across city task force of staff members and business owners to create goals for greenhouse gas reduction. The EEC could revise the City of Minneapolis's or City of Burnsville's greenhouse reduction plan and educate the Council on why we have to do this. Member Kostuch reviewed the 2014 Work Plan and said WP6 and OR2 is complete. WP2 and OR1 are ongoing. WP1, WP3, WP4, and WP5 can all be grouped as the greenhouse gas reduction action steps. Mr. Bintner said the EEC originally organized its work around the Green Step Cities program, and now the EEC uses the work plan. Another idea was to have less EEC Working Groups and Subcommittees next year and have EEC members attend other Commission's monthly meetings to learn how they operate. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. Kim Crockett — Letter and publications. This was information only. Motion made by Member Sierks'and seconded by Member Gubrud that'this report was only provided for information and doesn't reflect the views of the Commission. Member Glahn voted Nay. Motion carried. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. Member Sierks said Tim Barnes is still thinking about the deeper energy efficiency projects on the three worst city buildings. B. Business Recycling Working Group. Member Zarrin said her and Member Latham needs to draft Business Recycling into the EEC mission. C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. No Comment. D. Community Solar Subcommittee. No Comment. Member Zarrin excused herself from the meeting at 8:34p.m. E. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Gubrud said the 4th of July parade was a success. Home Energy squad handed out postcards with a $20 discount on a visit. There has been energy enhanced 35S installs since 2010. An About Town Article or Edina Edition in the Sun Current will be written to promote the home energy enhanced visit. The next film series movie will occur in September and might be on Water. The April Forum topicmight be Community Solar. F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. No Comment. G. Local Food Working Group. No Comment. ; H. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. No Comment. I. Student Subcommittee. No Comment. Motion made by Member Heer and seconded by Member-Gubrud that the EEC recognizes;Sarah's and Elana's contribution and wishes them good luck in their future endeavors and. Elana has served for two years. Motion carried unanimously. J. Water Quality Working Group. Member Waddick said they did a dry run of Storm Sewer stenciling. They did eight drains in one hour. They handed out door hangers to remind people not to dump organic materials into the storm drains, because they flow directly to nearby lakes, streams, etc. K. 2014 EEC Summary and Schedule. No Comment. IX. STAFF COMMENTS. Mr. Bintner said the Youth Board and Commission members meet with City staff to receive feedback on their experiences. Also, at the June 201h League of MN Cities meeting, the City was acknowledged as a Tier 3 city of Green Steps. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Heer declared the meeting adjourned at 8:50p.m. Motion made by Member'Glahn and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. ed, Respectfully submitt - Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator Attachments: Edina Community Solar Subcommittee -Staff meeting summary April 16, 2014 Attendees: Tim Barnes, Ross Bintner, Ken Bradley (MN Community Solar), Scott Neal, Josh Sprague, Bill Sierks, Paul Thompson Invited but Absent: Jim Hovland Background: In its 2014 Work Plan, the EEC identified Xcel's new "Community Solar" program as one if the Commission's priorities. The details of Xcel's program are not yet final, and the program is currently subject to review and comment before�the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Docket No. E002/M -13 -867. The subcommittee had its kickoff meeting on April 16, 2014. Ken Bradley of Minnesota Community Solar attended at the invitation of the subcommittee and provided an overview of the basic workings of a community solar project as proposed by Xcel. before the PUC. The meeting attendees asked questions about how a community solar program operates and what the City's, role in such a program could be. Ken Bradley then left the meeting so the City and EEC participants could discuss their thoughts on the City's possible role here. The consensus of the group after that discussion was that the subcommittee should continue to examine whether the City has a suitable location for a community solar project and identify what steps the City needs to take to further evaluate whether its participation in Xcel's community solar program is viable. \ K Edina Community Solar Subcommittee-Staff meeting summary., . May 9, 2014 Attendees: Ross Bintner, Nathan Franzen, Bill Sierks, Paul Thompson Invited but Absent: Scott Neal, Jim Hovland, Josh Sprague. Background: In its 2014 Work Plan, the EEC identified Xcel's new "Community Solar" program as one if the Commission's priorities. The details of Xcel's program are not yet final, and the program is currently subject to review and comment before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Docket. No. E002/M -13 -867. The subcommittee had its kickoff meeting on April 16, 2014. The outcome.of that meeting was an agreement to continue evaluating whether the City had a viable location for a community solar project; what steps-the City needs to take to decide on an appropriate role for the City (i.e. host, owner, customer); and what steps the City needs to take to actually host a community solar project for its residents: At the May 9 meeting, the team discussed the specific action steps for the City to continue looking into a community solar project and issues to evaluate. -A summary of the topics and issues follows. Possible sites for review: • Cold Storage Hillside Site (169 and 494)— security is needed for ground mounted system; south exposure is good; can be done on hill. • Braemar Arena - arch roof requires more engineering review, but can work, penetrations needed to be secure. The arching metal seam roof is not a problem. Flat roof section is ideal, but a bit small. - • Public Works Facility — new refurbished roof can be ideal; old building code leaves.5lb /sf for ballasted systems, and roof is new so it will last as long as the solar. Can get letter from architect if recently reviewed. Make sure roof membrane warranty is not compromised. • 50th and France Roof of Parking Lot— Parking lot mounted is expensive, and would have.to be'justified with other cost savings: (No snow removal) Ground mounted is cheapest, followed by rooftop at around $0.5 -1.0 /W installed premium. PV system mounted on roof of parking lot is much more expensive. Can bundle multiple sites for efficiencies of scale. Economics City of Edina can negotiate payment for lease, or take solar credits in -lieu of lease. Be sure to understand liability and insurance for both system and rooftop. RFP /Bid process is highly recommended to get the'most competitive deal. GESP /ESCO contract method possible too, but if an open bid process is not required, costs could be hidden and markup applied. Lease could be up to 20 years. City needs to make sure roof will last that long as it's not cost effective to have to repair or replace a roof with PV system installed. The City can own up to 40% of the system. City can use Met Council established energy inflation rate (approx 4 %) to calculate long term energy cost savings. Developer -- lease ownership needed to monetize tax benefits. Production tax credit and accelerated depreciation apply to system and reduce cost. The more system ownership committed to, the more tempting for a developer, as they have ess work community shares to disburse. Example system (very approximate costs): 250kW at about $3 /W installed = $750,000'total cost, $450,000 after tax benefits. System generates around (1250kWh /W installed) for total 312,500 kWh /year. Priced @ $0.12 /kWh = $37,500 /year for a 12 year simple payback. Next Steps in Project Development 1. City needs $10 -20K to hire an engineering firm to do site analysis and put together specifications and needed improvements. City can specify roof attachments, and liability coverage. a. Erickson Road (sp) of St. Paul is a roofing engineer capable of evaluating the Braemar roof.) b. Also need to work with the company currently warranting the roof. 2. Council commitment needed after preliminary analysis for a range of system ownership ($200K range for 100kW owned, as 40% of 250kW) 3. After Council commitment is made, work with legal and engineer to develop and administer RFP. Project Evaluation Steps Include: Site Evaluation Interconnection to Grid Conduit Routing Attachments to Structure Issues The City needs at least a 20 year roof. Also the contract must allocate the risk of roof repairs, and the City must make sure the existing roof warranty stays intact. After selecting a vendor the City should require the contractor to assure the warranty stays intact as well. IF the City is willing to buy up to 40% of the system, this will reduce the cost to the developer and is attractive. The City should have professional assistance if considering a solar leaseback. Examples and further resources Maplewood has a unique solar ownership structure, not community solar though. Woodbury has done some review of the RFP process, but has not yet moved forward. Westwood (Jack Hayes) does engineering in solar arena, and is the only local player. Otherwise the City can solicit nationally. Motion to EEC by Community Solar subcommittee: Recommend that City Council and City Manager take these actions to advance Community Solar in Edina: 1. Hire an engineering firm to do site analysis and prepare specifications for bidding ,a city- hosted community solar project. The estaimated cost.range is $10 K to.$20 K. As part of this process, the City needs to work with the company currently warranting the roof.of the host site. 2. The City should assume ownership of up to 40% of the Community Solar project. (40% is the maximum any subscriber may own under state law): The estaimted cost of 40% ownership of a 250kW system is approximately $200K. 3. The City should also work with the City attorney and engineering staff to develop and administer the community solar RFP. Issues that need to be addressed include but are not limited to Site Evaluation; Interconnection to Grid; Conduit Routing; Attachments to Structure; Insurance; and Liability Coverage. ENERGY NAME TERM I JIFIMIAIMIJIJI Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) & ENV_ IRONMENT A I S 10 COMMISSION 1 N I D I Work Session Work Session 1# of Mt9fl Attendbnce_% Meetings/Work Sessions '!i''' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 9 Glahn, William Gubrud, Bob 2/1 /2017 ii'` 2/1/2016 1 1 1 it 1 1 1 1 !ij 1 1 1 1 li' 1 i ;II 1 6/3/2014 1 1 (enter date) H ! , ;'' 7 7 it ' Ill i!!I ! 100 % 78% Heer, John Howard, John 2/1/2015 1 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -9 _ 7 _ 160% Kostuch, Keith Latham, Dianne Plunkett 2/1 /2016 1 2/1 /2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 6 89% 67 % Rudnicki, Tim 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 67% Sierks, Bill 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1.00% Thompson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8_ 89% Waddick, Louise 2/1/2017 LNIMIM. HIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 _ 86% Zarrin, Sarah 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 _ 89% Bale, Sarah 1 1 1 1 1 6 67 % Sokol, Elana MLE _ Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type 'I under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. MINUTE SUMMARY OF THE REGULAR MEETING. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 23, 2014 7.00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER IL ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Schroeder, Olsen, K1 berg, Lee, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton Members absent from roll: Scherer, Hal a ` Chair Staunton requested that Agenda asked for a motion. Commissioner PI-C Agenda Item VII. A. Commissioner .OI motion carried. III. APPROVAL F MEETIN C .D. be -,moved to bef�` N" 111. A. and enda Item VII.`D�bWore n, j. the motion. All voted aye; h Y- Chair Staunton noted that enda Iteti D. was coninued to the next meeting of the Planning Co . - mission on ugust 13; VI 4 due to a glitch in the public hearing notices. City orne Ro ..e , nutson i', d'cated that legally the City can proceed g��� g Y tY P withSh`earing; ho e� e ;anr�e eague e t re- notification for the August 13, 0: 4;mee ii g — g Hen epin Con 4 .ailing list was best. Re ,Eric Strand, E i Comm ity Lutheran Church thanked the Commission for theij a adding he ould return August 13'. Commis'o ; er Platteter YU ved to continued agenda item VII. D. Rezoning Beacon Interfaith Ho,,s� .,g to th an ugust 13, 2014 meeting of the Edina Planning Commission. Co miss R her Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Platteter moved approval of the meeting agenda as amended. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. [1] IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS — Fill Secretary Vacancy Commissioner Platteter moved to nominate Commissioner Carr as Secretary. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All vote aye; Carr appointed Secretary to the Edina Planning Commission. V. APPROVAL OF'CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Carr moved approval of the July .9, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close community comment. Commissioner Forrest seconded the4iiotion. All voted aye; public comment closed. VII. PUBLIC .-,HEARINGS A. Variance. Porter. 4206 Crocker, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Rothstein informed the Commission Steve and Peggy Porter (the applicants) are requesting a 4.33 foot side yard setback variance to remodel their home and construct an attached garage 3 feet from the southern interior side property line. Continuing, Rothstein explained that the subject property is approximately 67 feet in width and is 13,317 square feet in area. There is an existing single - family home on the property, and the applicant is requesting to remodel a portion of their existing home and complete an addition to add a two -car garage to the south side of their existing home, and convert the existing one -car garage into a living space: There are three existing single - family homes abutting the north side lot line.and one existing single - family home on the south lot, both facing Crocker Avenue (4212 Crocker Avenue). The home located on 4212 Crocker has a two -car garage on the south side of the home, and was,built in 2006 with no variances. Rothstein concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance based on the following findings. 1. The "property with an addition that can comply with the setbacks is a reasonable use; and the request to deviate from the side yard is not necessary to make reasonable use of the property. Page 2 of 14 1 2. The home is appropriate in size and scale with the addition of a complying, detached garage, or a single or 1.5- car garage that complies with the setbacks. 3. There is not a practical difficulty in meeting the ordinance requirements due to the ability to locate an expanded garage in a conforming location. 4. There are not circumstances unique to the property that necessitates a variance to make reasonable use of the property. Appearing for the Applicants Steve and Peggy Porter, Applicants. Discussion Commissioner Carr noted that immediate neighbors appear to support the. request as submitted. Staff agreed. Applicant Presentation Ms. Porter addressed the Commission and explained that she distributed their remodeling plans to neighbors, adding neighbors have indicated their .full support for the project as submitted. Porter further added that practical difficulties do include aesthetics, and the addition as designed is aesthetically.pleasing. , Concludmg,,Porter said in her opinion their proposal enhances not only their property, it enhances the neighborhood. F Chair Staunton asked Ms. Porter if there are changes to the drainage- pattern as the result of this project. Ms. Porter responded there should be no change to drainage patterns. Commissioner Olsen asked Ms. Porter if a deck is proposed. Ms. Porter responded that no deck is proposed at this time; however, they are considering adding an at grade patio. Commissioner Platteter asked if the large evergreen would be removed. Mr. Porter responded in the affirmative; adding their intent is to replace this tree with another to the middle of the yard. Commissioner Lee asked the applicants if they ever considered a tandem garage. Mr.. Porter responded that they did discuss tandem garages; however, agreed they were undesirable. Public Hearing .Chair Stanton opened the public hearing. Page 3 of 14 I� The following spoke in support of the project as submitted. Jay Podaly, 42.12 Crocker Avenue, Edina, MN Sue Gruidl, 4213 Crocker Avenue, Edina, MN Discussion Commissioner Carr stated that although many neighbors have expressed their support for the project;she can't support it as submitted. Commissioner Lee added she is also having a difficult time in finding a reason(s) for support. She stated she was very happy to see this wasn't a tear down, noting she believes the, proposal as submitted is an improvement; however she continues to struggle with the request because there are conforming solutions. Commissioner. Schroeder agreed that there are conforming solutions; however, a tandem garage does create a very long building wall, adding this isn't a teardown and what's proposed appears acceptable. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved to recommend approval of the requested variances based on findings 1) Existing location of home on lot, 2) two car garage facing streetis- reasonable, 3) lot is unique because of the three abutting: properties�to its north; 4) �Engineer report; and 5) subject to the plans presented at the July 23' . meeting. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Ayes, Olsen, Schroeder, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton. Nays, Lee and Carr. Motion carried 5 -2. B. Variance. Cates Fine Homes. 6816 Cheyenne Circle, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Rothstein informed the Commission the subject property is approximately 150 feet in width and -is 59,561 square feet (1.4 acres) in are Approximately .8 acres of the lot is above the Ordinary High Water Level (OHM of Indianhead Lake. She explained that there are two existing single - family homes on the north and south lots, both facing the Cheyenne Circle cul -de -sac. The north lot has a front setback of 53 feet and a setback from the OHW of 31.7 feet. The lot to the south of the subject property is set back 55.7 feet from the front property line and is set 10 feet from.the rear property line: Rothstein said at this time the property owner is requesting to demolish the existing single - family home, which currently does not meet the setback from the OHW, and build a new home. Page4of14 Planner Rothstein concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: • The proposed use is permitted in the R- I Single ,Dwelling Unit District and complies with all the standards, with exception of the front yard setback (as determined by the average of the two adjacent homes). • The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. • The property is subject to the OHW setback of 75 feet, and the property to the north does not meet that setback, allowing the home to set farther back toward Indianhead Lake (31.7 feet from OHW). • The proposed home, as proposed, protects the lake and existing foliage by meeting the OWH setback of 75 feet. • There is a practical difficulty in meeting the ordinance requirements and.there are circumstances unique to the property due to an imposed front yard setback from adjacent homes that do not meet rear yard setbacks. • The variance, if approved, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions: 1) Survey date stamped: July 9,'2014 and 2) Building plans and elevations date stamped: July 8, 2014 Appearing for Applicant Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes and Mike Huber, Architect. Discussion Commissioner Platteter noted their reference to the Watershed District and asked how far along they were in that process. Ms. Cates responded revised plans were submitted to the watershed district, adding they are still in discussions. Mr. Huber interjected that the goal of the drainage plan is to have zero runoff. He added there, will be a cistern that would contain and filter water that will be used for irrigation. Commissioner Lee complimented the applicants on their storm water management plan adding the design is super. Lee concluded she has no issue with the project as presented. Page 5 of 14 Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing; no one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Platteter move6to close the?l ublic hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted. aye; motion to close public hearing passed. Motion Commissioner Carr movedyariance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including ;final approval from the 9 -Mile Creek Watershed District. Commissioner`Platteter seconded the motion'. All voted aye; motion carried. C. Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan °Amendment & Variances. Frauenshuh. 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Commission Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear down the existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5 108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, justmest of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD =2, Planned Commercial District. Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial use. Teague explained to accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District -1, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. Preliminary Development Plan with consideration of Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 30 and 25 feet. 3. A Comprehensive.Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Teague further no this "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should these "preliminary" requests be approved by the City Council, the second step would be Final Rezoning to PCD -2 and Final Site Plan & Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 feet to 30 and 25 feet. The second step would again require review byboth the Planning Commission and City Council. The proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment in this first step would be a final action. Planner Teague stated staff recommends that the City Council approve the request fora; Comprehensive .Plan Amendments as follows:" Page 6 of 14 ➢ To re -guide 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard from O, Office to NC, Neighborhood Commercial; and re -guide 5125, 5105, 5101 Edina Industrial Boulevard and 7700 Normandale Boulevard from 1, Industrial to NC, Neighborhood Commercial. Approval is.subject to the following findings: I . The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. 2. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties to the south is really a housekeeping item, as it was mistakenly guided for industrial use. 3. Neighborhood Commercial 'is defined as small to moderate -scale commercial, serving primarily adjacent neighborhoods. Primary uses are retail and services, offices, studios, institutional use. Existing uses in this area include a gas station, limited retail and convenience food. All are permitted uses within the PCD -2 and PCD-4 Zoning Districts. 4. The proposal would meet the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. 5. The traffic study done by Wenck concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project. Continuing, Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and build a 10,000 square foot retail building as proposed subject to the following findings: I.The proposed rezoning meets the criteria in Section 36 -216, as noted on Pages 5 and 6 above, in regard to rezoning property. Subject to approval of the Page 7 of 14 A Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the,project would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The project would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties; would not result in an overly intensive land use; would not result in undue traffic congestion or hazards; and with the exception of the setback variances would conform to all zoning ordinance requirements. 2.. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed eland uses in this area. The uses to the south exist today as neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and. enhance this limited retail area. Approval is further subject to the following Conditions: I . The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development .Plans dated June 6; 2014. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all .'minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the City Code. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated July 15, 2014. 5. Approval of the requested Front Yard Setback Variances. Appearing for the Applicant Dave Anderson, Frauenshuh and Nick Sperides, Sperides Reiners Architects Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson addressed the Commission and gave a brief run - through of the revisions to the plans since their last meeting with the Commission. Discussion Commissioner Platteter commented that the proposed sidewalk going north doesn't appear to connect, and wondered if there was a way to ensure there is a sidewalk connection north. Mr. Anderson responded that connection would be reviewed. Platteter said it makes sense to him to have a connection to the north so people in the offices to the north .could walk to the site instead of driving. Commissioner Platteter asked if the transformer would be screened. Mr. Sperides responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Terhaar, Wenck & Associates if he found any issues with traffic flow. Mr. Terhaar responded that for the most part traffic flows well and will continue to work well. He acknowledged there are.times when there is back up at left lane ramp; however it does clear rather quickly. Forrest asked if Terhaar believes Page 8 of 14 this "use" would generate more traffic than the present use. Terhaar responded in the affirmative, adding they believe. there will be an increase during the PM peak hours. Commissioner Carr. complimented the applicant on their design changes and questioned what the proposed exterior stone looks like. Mr. Sperides explained at final review they will be presenting a material, board that would better highlight'the exterior materials and color scheme. Commissioner Platteter asked if there is a bus stop in.the area. Mr. Anderson responded in the affirmative;. however, there is no bus. shelter. Commissioner Lee commented that it appears the site will be losing the existing green buffer zone. Commissioner Schroeder said he has an issue with drainage noting off Metro Boulevard there is a low area along the sidewalk that could flood during a heavy rainfall. He added in his opinion- it's not a good idea to have people walk to the building through a stream of water. Mr. Sperides agreed, adding he would review the engineering drawings and "take care" of any drainage issues. Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing; no one was, present. Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioners Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Kilberg commented that in his opinion.the redevelopment of this site establishes a good precedent. He said with this proposal pedestrians are better served. Kilberg complimented the drive - through redesign, adding:in his opinion it's much better than at sketch plan. Continuing, Kilberg stated he: likes the rain garden feature. In conclusion, Kilberg said he likes the location of the building instead of having to view a sea of cars. Kilberg said he supports the proof of parking, the improvement to traffic flow and is in favor of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the Preliminary Rezoning and Development Plan. Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague if the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan should include the property to the east. Planner Teague said at this time it would be best to only focus on the subject site. Commissioner Lee commented if the goal of the Commission is to bring new buildings up to the street the Commission should be clearer in what they mean when they suggest that an applicant "pull the building" up to the street. She stated the solution presented is good; however, engaging the street could be better defined. Continuing, -Lee said she also likes to.see boulevard trees and does have a concern that the existing Page 9 of 14 trees and green "buffer would be lost with this redevelopment. Chair Staunton Said the intent of "pulling the building" up to the street was to engage the street. Commissioner Schroeder explained that the direction from the Commission to relax the setback of the `building from the front street was to create an engaging street front with patio spaces, etc-. Schroeder "said the Commissions goal was to achieve an active engaging pedestrian friendly experience at front building facades; however, at times achieving that goal was difficult `beeaus' the applicant(s) may have certain restraints (safety). Mr. Sperides -said they would work toward creating more active patio areas. A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging that the corner of Edina Industrial Boulevard /Metro Boulevard is busy; and encouraged the applicant to add more vegetation in that area. The discussion continued focusing on the parking area and public space and ways to better achieve balance. Commissioner Carr suggested that the applicant use pavers in the two patios and other areas because when viewing the site there appears to be a lot of concrete. Mr: Sperides responded that at this time the materials for the hard surface areas haven't been finalized; however, would keep in mind the use of pavers. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Platteter moved to, recommend Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder asked if the motion allows for movement flexibility along the north side of the building patio area. Commissioner Lee said she would also like to see additional landscaping added. Chair Staunton suggested adding their issues as an amendment to the motion. Commissioner Schroeder moved to amend the motion to include as an additional condition a reapportionment of the public space on the north side to create more useable space on the south side. Commissioners Platteter and Carr accepted that amendment. Commissioner Lee moved to amend the motion to include as an additional condition the addition of vegetation and trees on the boulevard area. Commissioners Platteter Page*10 of 14 and Carr accepted that motion subject to findings. A brief discussion ensued with Mr. Anderson pointing out, with regard to the request for additional plantings on the boulevard there is a concern that tenant identification and signage could be compromised. Commissioner Lee commented that with careful selection of plantings such as` deciduous trees any impact should be minimal. Chair Staunton called for the vote; all voted aye; preliminary rezoning and preliminary development plan approved 7 -0. VIII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Front Yard Setback and First Floor I -foot rule for tear down and rebuild. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission that at their last- meeting they discussed front yard setback and the one -foot rule for teardown and rebuild. Teague said in speaking with the city attorney he is recommending that the zoning ordinance regulations on these two items be revised. With graphics Teague highlighted proposed changes to the ordinance. Continuing, Teague explained front setback reads "average the front street setback of the homes on either side ". He pointed out this does not account for a side street setback or an abutting lot with a front street setback that faces a different street. The intent of the one -foot rule was that the first level of the new home was to match or be no taller than one foot above the pedestrian entry of the existing split level. The ordinance did not define front entry so a garage could be considered a front entry. Additional, it did no account for multiple entries for new home. Chair Staunton noted much of the ordinance was written to address the east side and the traditional grid pattern, adding it's extremely difficult in some areas of Edina like Indian Hills or Rolling Green where the lots are large and oddly formed to achieve a uniform front yard standard. Planner Teague stated he agrees with that observation; however, Zoning Ordinance requirements are across the board. He explained the only way to.remedy the problems that arise would be to establish different zoning districts within the R -I umbrella. Teague also said the new I -foot front yard rule has been difficult because split -level homes are not adequately addressed. Teague pointed out that the City doesn't define front entry, adding there are areas of the code that are clearly defined in every instance. Chair Staunton acknowledged the difficulty pointing out the City, with regard to the I -foot rule didn't want residents to artificially raise the grade of the house. Teague Page 11 of 14 agreed. Commissioner Forrest stated the ordinance changes proposed by Planner Teague are a great improvement; however, she questioned if it would be beneficial to provide illustrations interpreting the changes. Commissioner Carr said it would really help her if she could see illustrations and asked Planner Teague to provide illustrations used by other cities to clarify ordinance requirements. She added as previously mentioned by Forrest visuals would be beneficial. Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to place these two topics back on the Planning Commission for their August 2r meeting. B. Conflict of Interest/Bylaws Planner Presentation Planner Teague - stated as a follow up to our previous discussions on Bylaws and conflict of interest he indicated that the city, attorney has suggested the following: SECTION 21. ETHICAL AND RESPECTFUL CONDUCT (A) Conflict of.lnterest Members may not, use their position on the Planning Commission for personal benefit. The interests of the Planning Commission must be the first priority in all decisions and actions. Any member who has a financial interest in or .Wh6..Js `emplo ed.+by.°: a_, b.usinessk4hat3rh6s: a> financiakinterestvin,, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any Planning Commission action, decision or recommendation must promptly disclose this fact as a conflict of interest. A member who has disclosed a conflict of interest should. abstain from discussion and voting on the matter and should sit in the audience when the matter comes before ;the .Planning..C.ommission. Discussion Commissioner Schroeder stated he understands the need for conflict of interest language; however, he pointed out Edina is a small community and the question becomes at what point does it become financial gain or interest. Chair Staunton agreed adding financial interest is difficult to define, adding it's hard to make a blanket move. Schroeder agreed pointing out for those of us that work for large companies we may not even know if certain sectors of our company are working with or for the City. Commissioner Carr said. in her opinion the language as written is too restrictive. She suggested the Commission look at the guidelines written by the League of Women Voters. Continuing,. Carr pointed out conflict isn't only financial there can be conflict if Page 12 of 14 the applicant is a relative, close friend or neighbor, adding that's where perception can play a part. The discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging the difficulty in "tightening" the language. It was noted a conflict could be considered anything that prevents one from making an objective decision. Chair Staunton said the Commission has had ongoing discussions on this topic, adding he likes the idea of a City Policy; however, the Commission could ask the Council to weigh in with their opinions. It was further suggested that staff provide the Commission with the.League of Cities policy and also circulate conflict of interest policies from other cities before a decision is made. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. X. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Staunton suggested that the Commission have a discussion on density. Staunton noted it appears the Commission doesn't really have an organized approach to density, adding it would also benefit the applicants by providing them with more guidance. Commissioner agreed that that an educated approach to density needs to be developed. Commissioner Forrest stated that the Wooddale/Valley View-Small Area Plan is working well with a r great group of volunteers. Forrest reported that next week the working group would be interviewing consultants. Commissioner Lee commented that their goal is to also have a community session sometime in September XI:STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that the City Council heard the Sketch Plan for 7200 France and indicated to the applicant that the project is too dense and too tall. Teague reported that the City received a large amount of a -mails on this sketch plan review. Continuing, Teague reported that the Tree.Ordinance is "still in the loop" for discussion on October 21, 2014. Teague reminded Commissioners that there will be a work session before the next Commission meeting on August 27`h. Teague said he believes the meeting will be at 5:30 in the Community Room. Topic of discussion building permits process. Page 13 of 14 XII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Lee Moved adjournment at 10:30 PM. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye;'motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 pm. Respectfully submitted Page 14 of 14 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 19, 2014• 9:16 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 9:16 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Sprague, seconded by Commissioner Swenson, approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for August 4, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT ENG 1445 FRANCE AVENUE LIGHTING — AWARDED City Engineer Millner explained the Lighting Contract was approved earlier during the Council meeting, but must also berapproved, by, the. Housing and Redevelopment Authority because of the funding for the France Avenue Improvements. He reiterated that staff would be providing streetscape designs at a later date. Commissioner Swenson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brindle, approving Request for Purchase — Award of Bid — Contract ENG 14 -15 France Avenue Lighting, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder; Egan Companies at $402,732.75, with the expectation the Council would receive complete streetscape depictions at the next meeting. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. PENTAGON PARK UPDATE Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development provided a brief report updating the status of the Pentagon Park demolition and renovations. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:32 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Page I A .f1 X7'T1 TT ♦ /TT 111 T _ I. 0 Le AO ink ,988 To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: September 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution 2014 -04; Authorize purchase of property —'3944 West 49-1/2 Street Action Requested: Approve Resolution 2014 -04 to authorize the Chair and Executive Director to execute the Purchase Agreement and other documents necessary to purchase the property. Information: The owners of the former Hooten Cleaners property have approached City staff to inquire whether the City remains interested. in purchasing the property. After the City's efforts to purchase the property in 2012 -2013, the owners chose to enter into a sales agreement with a private party. That potential sale fell through in spring 2014. While the owners had interest in remodeling and leasing the building to new tenants, they are now interested in selling the property outright. Background: The City / Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has previously studied the public parking availability at the 50th and France business district and found that additional public parking is needed to support continued success. The existing North Parking Ramp at 3936 -40 West 49 -1/2 Street has the ability to be expanded to provide additional public parking for customers and employees. It is also desired to incorporate street level activity in future parking. expansions so that the overall business environment is enhanced. In summer of 2013, the City commissioned an independent appraisal of the property at 3944 W. 49 -1/2 Street to establish .the fair market value. At that time, the owners had two signed.leases and were anticipating taking out a loan to invest approximately $300,000 into the property to create a viable building shell for new tenants. The City made offers based on that independently determined value. The City's previous purchase offer (October 2013) included the following key terms: • $1,550,000 purchase price (based on enhanced appraised value plus reimbursement for professional services incurred by the sellers). • Accept property in "as -is" condition. • Prompt closing (30 -days) without financing or environmental contingencies. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 • Some funds held in escrow to cover potential costs of environmental remediation (estimated between $116,000 and $342,000). • City to provide letter for IRS Section 1033 exchange. • Each party responsible for customary closing costs and respective professional fees. • City to order title insurance and ALTA survey at City expense. • Seller responsible for taxes, assessments and utilities through the date of closing. • Seller and any tenants to waive relocation benefits. • Building must be free of tenants with no active leases prior to closing. • Clean title required (no liens, no leases, etc). The owners are now willing to accept these terms, except for the escrow amount to cover potential remed iation. Staff recommends that the Edina HRA honor its previous purchase offer with one modification. It is recommended that the HRA accept the site in 'as -is' condition and not withhold any funds at closing. With due diligence conducted in 2013, the environmental risks are understand and the costs are within reason. This is a strategic acquisition so that the City and HRA have an opportunity to expand the North public parking facility. A direct purchase is preferred so that the HRA retains the flexibility to divide, sell, or otherwise transfer any portion of the land not needed for public purposes. Anticipated Funding Source: Existing funds are available in the Centennial Lakes TIF District for site acquisition and redevelopment purposes. It is not necessary to incur debt or increase the tax levy to acquire this property. Attachment: Resolution 2014 -04, Purchase Agreement (16 pages) RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -04 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 3944 WEST 49 -112 STREET WHERAS, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) may acquire real property and may operate and maintain public parking "facilities in connection with any of its projects pursuant to the authority provided under Minn. Stat. 469.012; and WHEREAS, the HRA has previously constructed a public parking facility located at 3936 -3940 West 49- 1 /2 Street; and WHEREAS, studies have confirmed the need for additional parking in the business district as well as the viability of the existing garage to be expanded to provide additional parking; and WHEREAS, terms of a Purchase Agreement have been reached with the owner of the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approves the Purchase Agreement for the property located at 3944 West 49-1/2 Street and authorizes the Chair and Executive Director to execute the documents necessary to purchase the property. Dated: September 2, 2014. Attest: Ann Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 James B. Hovland, Chair CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Executive Director r RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -04 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 3944 WEST 49 -112 STREET WHERAS, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) may acquire real property and may operate and maintain public parking "facilities in connection with any of its projects pursuant to the authority provided under Minn. Stat. 469.012; and WHEREAS, the HRA has previously constructed a public parking facility located at 3936 -3940 West 49- 1 /2 Street; and WHEREAS, studies have confirmed the need for additional parking in the business district as well as the viability of the existing garage to be expanded to provide additional parking; and WHEREAS, terms of a Purchase Agreement have been reached with the owner of the property located at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approves the Purchase Agreement for the property located at 3944 West 49-1/2 Street and authorizes the Chair and Executive Director to execute the documents necessary to purchase the property. Dated: September 2, 2014. Attest: Ann Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 James B. Hovland, Chair CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Executive Director This page intentionally left blank. a. REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement "), dated as of the' day of , 2014 (the "Contract Date "), by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA,. MINNESOTA, a body politic and.. corporate under the laws of the, State . of Minnesota ( "Purchaser ") and'SOON YONG PARK',and JUNG JA VARK, husband and "wife, ( "Sellers "). 1. PROPERTY. In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements hereinafter contained, Seller agrees to sell and convey to Purchaser, and Purchaser agrees to buy the real property, legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto from Seller, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, together with the building constructed thereof (the "Building "), the improvements located within the Building (the "Improvements ") and all and singular rights and appurtenances pertaining to the real property including, but not limited to all right, title and interest of Seller in and to adjacent streets, rights of way, easements, utility agreements, parking and other shared use agreements and all hereditaments and appurtenances pertaining . thereto, if any (hereinafter referred to as the "Property "). 2. PURCHASE PRICE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT. The total purchase price ( "Purchase Price ") for the Property shall be payable by Purchase Price to Seller by wire transfer at Closing (as hereinafter defined) in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and No /100 ($1,550,000.00) Dollars. 3. ' TITLE TO;BE. DELIVERED. Seller shall deliver to Purchaser, or cause to be delivered to Purchaser ;. at Closing, an executed Limited Warranty Deed ( "Deed ") in recordable form conveying fee simple title to the Property subject to the terms of this Agreement and: (a) 'Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota; (b) Building, zoning and subdivision laws and regulations consistent with the current use of the Property; (c) The lien of real estate taxes and installments of special assessments which are payable by Purchaser pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; (d) Applicable laws, regulations, zoning regulations and ordinances, whether federal, state or local; and (e) Exceptions to title which constitute encumbrances, restrictions, or easements which have been disclosed to Purchaser and accepted by Purchaser in writing; (hereinafter "Permitted Encumbrances "). 4. RELOCATION BENEFITS. are aware of Sellers' rights and payments that Sellers may be eligible to receive pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (the "Act "). Sellers acknowledge that Sellers have been given the opportunity to seek and receive the advice of legal counsel with respect to relocation, moving, reestablishment and other costs, if any, that may be available under the Act. 177979v1 Sellers hereby acknowledge that the payment of the Purchase Price does not include a payment for Relocation Benefits. At Closing and as a condition precedent to Closing, Sellers will waive any right to receive any relocation payments pursuant to the Act. (or, other federal or state law provisions) with .respect to the Property: Sellers acknowledge that Sellers will make such a waiver of Sellers' own volition and with full knowledge of the specific relocation benefits to which. Sellers maybe entitled: Sellers and Purchaser agree that this is a voluntary sale by Sellers. Purchaser represents that Purchaser would not acquire the Property in the event that negotiations between Sellers and Purchaser had failed to result in an amicable agreement. Prior to any action by Purchaser indicating intent to acquire the, Property, Sellers placed the, Property on the market for sale. Thereafter, upon inquiry by the Purchaser, Sellers requested that Purchaser acquire the Property through negotiation. Sellers clearly showed intent to sell the Property on the open market prior to any discussions, inquiries or negotiations by Purchaser. If the transaction set forth by this Agreement is not completed, Purchaser has no present intent to acquire the property by eminent domain and has not considered the use of eminent domain. If this Agreement is terminated for any reason, Sellers are free to retain ownership of the Property or to sell the Property on the private market. As Purchaser, and Sellers agree that this is a voluntary sale, state and federal law permit the Purchaser to request a waiver of relocation benefits from Sellers, as provided under Minnesota Statute Section 117.521. Prior to and as a condition of Closing, Sellers will be required to sign a relocation waiver, the form of which is substantially the same as shown on Exhibit "B" and the final form will be subject to the approval of Purchaser- ( "Relocation Waiver "). Purchaser will arrange for a relocation consultant to meet with Sellers prior to Closing. If Sellers do not waive relocation benefits, this Agreement will be terminated and Sellers will be free to retain ownership of the Property or sell on the private market. 5. EVIDENCE OF TITLE. (a) -Within twenty (20) days following the date of execution of this Purchase Agreement, Purchaser shall obtain a commitment for an ALTA Owner's Form title insurance policy (the "Commitment ") issued by Land Title, Inc. (the "Title Company "), pursuant to which the Title Company agrees to issue to the Purchaser upon the recording of the documents of conveyance referred to herein an Owner's title insurance policy insuring the Property in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. The Commitment shall include proper searches covering bankruptcies, state and federal judgments and liens and levied and pending .special assessments, which Commitment: (1) Insures that Purchaser has marketable title of record to the Property, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, leases, claims and charges, all material easements,' rights -of -way, covenants, conditions and restrictions and any other matters affecting title, except for Permitted Encumbrances. (2) Waives or agrees to insure over the following standard exceptions: 1779790 2 (A) Facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive survey of the Property, if Purchaser obtains, prior to the Closing Date, at Purchaser's sole expense, a survey satisfactory to the Title Company for purpose of waiving the standard exception for survey matters; (B) Rights and claims of parties in possession; and (C) Mechanic's, contractor's and material liens and lien claims. (b) - Purchaser shall have fifteen (15) days after receipt of the Commitment to deliver to Seller written -objections to title based on marketability of the Property ( "Objections ") and Seller shall have sixty (60) days to have such Objections removed or satisfied, during which period the Closing Date shall be postponed, if necessary. If Seller fails or is unable to have such Objections removed within said time, Purchaser may, at its sole election, do any of the following: (1) Termination. Terminate this Agreement without any liability on its part in exchange for a quit claim deed for the Property. (2) Escrow for Cure: If the parties agree to an escrow, Seller shall escrow. an amount sufficient to assure cure of the Objection(s). Any amount so escrowed will be placed in an escrow with title pending such cure. If 'such escrow is established, the parties agree to execute and deliver such documents as may be reasonably required by the Title Company, and Seller agrees to pay the charges of the Title Company to create and administer the escrow. (3) Purchaser . Cure. To the extent an Objection can be satisfied by the payment of money, Purchaser shall have the right to pay the amount necessary to satisfy such Objection and the amount so applied shall be reimbursed to Purchaser by Seller or, to the extent the amount is less than the Purchase Price, deducted from the Purchase Price at the Closing, provided, that the amount due to the third -party claimant is an undisputed liquidated amount for which Seller's liability is undisputed. Notwithstanding the limitation, waiver, and relinquishment of remedies in Section 16, if Purchaser funds such a cure of monetary objection, and is not reimbursed at Closing by Seller, Purchaser shall have a right of action to recover from Seller an amount equal to the dollar amount of Seller's undisputed and liquidated liability. (4) Waiver. Waive such objections and take title to the Property subject to such objections. 177979v1 3 l 6. REPRESENTATIONS OF SELLER. On information and belief, without special investigation, Sellers hereby represent to Purchaser: (a) That Sellers have the requisite, power, and authority to enter into this Purchase .Agreement and the closing documents relating thereto to be signed by it; that the execution, delivery and performance by Sellers of such documents do not.conflict with or result in violation of any judgment, order or decree of any court to which Sellers are a party; such documents are valid and binding obligations of Sellers. (b) At Closing, there will be no existing claims, actions; suits or other proceedings pending, or to the knowledge of Sellers, threatened by any governmental department or agency, or any other corporation, partnership or entity or person whomsoever against Sellers or the Property, which in any manner or to any, extent may detrimentally affect the Property or Purchaser's right,. title or interest in and to any part or all of the Property after Closing. (c) Other than Sellers, there are no other tenants or occupants of the Property. (d) On the Date of Closing there will be no (i) outstanding leases or occupancy agreements, or (ii) outstanding contracts made by Sellers for any improvements to the Property which have not been fully paid for or for which Sellers shall not have made arrangements to pay off, at Closing, or that will affect the Property or be binding upon Purchaser or upon the Property subsequent to Closing without Purchaser's written consent; 'and Sellers shall cause to be discharged all mechanic's or materialmen's liens arising from any labor or materials furnished to the Property that were made at the request' of Sellers, its agents, or contractors, prior to the Date of Closing and any mortgages or other such similar encumbrances. (e) Until the Date of Closing, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Sellers shall maintain the land associated with the Property in its present condition, reasonable wear and tear and damage by casualty excepted. (f) Sellers are not a foreign person; as such term is defined in Section 1445(f) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as'amended, and shall deliver an affidavit to that effect at closing, which shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Purchaser. (g) To Sellers' knowledge, except as disclosed in the documentation provided to Purchaser pursuant to Section 7 and as documented in the Barr Engineering Phase I ESA (August 9, 2013) and Summary Report of Limited Phase II (September 18, 2013) on behalf of Purchaser, (i) no 'toxic materials, hazardous wastes or hazardous substances, as such terms are defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1996, as amended (42 U.S.C. §6901, et seq.) or in the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (42 U.S.C. §9601, et sue.), including, without limitation, any asbestos or asbestos - related products or materials and any oils, petroleum- derived 177979v1 4 compounds or pesticides ( "Hazardous Materials ")'.have been generated, treated, stored, released or disposed of or otherwise.placed; deposited in or located on the Property; and (ii) the Property is free of Hazardous Materials and is not subject to any "superfund" type liens or claims by governmental regulatory agencies or third parties arising from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances in, on, or about the Property. (h) To Sellers' knowledge, the conveyance ,of the Property pursuant hereto will not violate any currently existing applicable statute, ordinance, governmental restriction or regulation, or any private restriction or agreement to which Sellers are a party. (i) To Sellers' knowledge, there are no underground storage tanks or wells on the Property, it being understood that the representation as to wells shall be recited in the Deed'to be delivered by Seller at Closing. (j) To the best of Sellers' knowledge, Sellers represent that methamphetarnine production has not occurred on the Property. (k) Solely for purposes of satisfying the requirements of Minn, Stat. § 115.55, Sellers certify that, to Sellers' knowledge, there is no "individual sewage treatment system" (within the meaning of that statute) on or serving the Property. Seller certifies that sewage generated on the Property goes to a facility permitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. . Except as herein expressly stated, Purchaser is purchasing 'the Propelaty based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Seller or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property "as is where is" subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties . herein contained,. The representations set forth in this section shall be continuing and shall be ;true and correct as of the Date of Closing With; the same force and effect as if made at that time and shall survive'the,Closing for a period of two (2) years. 7. REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AND ACCESS TO PROPERTY. Within twenty (20) days of the execution of this Agreement, Sellers agree to provide, Purchaser with' all of the following documentation: (a) True and correct copies of all existing environmental assessment reports, soil reports and results of all soil tests and environmental assessments in Seller's possession; (b) Surveys, permits, licenses, leases, complete copies of all contracts currently affecting the Property readily available or Sellers' possession ( "Other Agreements "), and notices received within the last 90 days from the city, state or other governmental authorities pertaining to uncured violations of any law, ordinance or regulation. 1779790 5 P, Sellers" obligation to provide the foregoing 'documentation shall continue for any such documentation that Sellers receive following execution of this Agreement and prior to Closing. Sellers acknowledge. that Purchaser and Purchaser's agents shall have access to the Property without charge and at reasonable times for the purpose of Purchaser's survey, investigation and testing of the Property ( "Investigation" ): Purchaser shall pay all costs and expenses of Investigation and Purchaser shall hold.. harmless and indemnify the Property and Sellers, their heirs, successors and assigns, from and against any and all claims, suits, losses, liabilities, and expenses (including attorney's fees, expert,! s. fees, and other expenses of litigation) on account of injury to or death of any persons (including Purchaser's) or damage to property or contamination of or adverse effects on the environment or liens against Seller or the Property, caused by Purchaser's entry onto. the Property. Purchaser's obligations under this Section 7 shall survive the termination of this. Agreement or the Closing. Purchaser shall repair and restore any damage to the Property caused by or occurring during Purchaser's Investigation. and return the Property to substantially the same condition as existed prior to any Investigation. Purchaser shall have the right in its sole discretion to contact various public officials and administrators to verify information regarding the status of the Property and to determine that the Property is suitable for Purchaser's intended use. 8. PURCHASER'S CONTINGENCIES. The obligations of Purchaser under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon.the following: (a) The representations of Sellers contained in this Agreement must be true-now and as of the Closing Date, as if made on the Closing Date and Sellers shall have delivered to Purchaser on the Closing Date, a certificate, signed by Sellers, certifying that such representations are true as of the Closing Date (the "Bring - down Certificate' ), except to the extent that the representations are no longer true and acceptable to Purchaser. (b) Title to the Property and easements to be acquired under this Agreement shall be held by Sellers on the Closing Date, and shall be free and clear of all encumbrances except the Permitted Encumbrances. (c) Purchaser shall be satisfied, in its reasonable discretion, with the results of any Investigation conducted by Purchaser or Seller on the Property. (d) Sellers, as owners of the Property, agree to sign a voluntary waiver of all relocation assistance, services, payments and benefits as set forth in Minnesota Statute Section 117.521, as required under Section 4. (e) Sellers shall perform all of the obligations required to be performed under this Agreement, as and when required by this Agreement, except as waived by Purchaser. 177979v1 (f) Purchaser having determined that it is satisfied with its review and analysis of all documents required to be provided by Seller under Section 7. (g) No suit, zoning change, governmental - investigation or other proceeding challenging the transactions contemplated hereby, shall have been threatened or instituted. If the contingencies set forth herein have not been satisfied or waived by Purchaser by the Closing Date, as otherwise extended, Agreement shall be null and void and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder, except for Purchaser's indemnity obligations pursuant to Section 7. The contingencies set forth in this section are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Seller, provided Purchaser abides by.the time requirements set forth above. 9. CLOSING. The closing hereof shall take place on or before October 9, 2014, except as otherwise extended or terminated as provided under this Agreement (the "Closing" or "Date of Closing "). The Closing shall take place at the offices of the Title Company. If Closing does not occur on or before December 5, 2014, this Agreement shall be null and void, Purchaser shall execute a quit claim deed for the Property in favor of Sellers, and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder, except for Purchaser's indemnity obligations pursuant to Section 7. At Closing, Sellers and Purchaser shall disclose their Social Security Numbers or Federal Tax Identification Numbers for the purpose of completing state and federal tax forms. 10. SELLERS' OBLIGATIONS AT CLOSING. On or prior to the Date of Closing, Sellers shall: (a) Execute, acknowledge and deliver to Purchaser the Deed to the - Property conveying to Purchaser marketable fee simple title to the Property subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances. (b) Execute and/or deliver to Purchaser such other documents as may be required by this Agreement or as may be reasonably required by Title Company, including well disclosures and sewage treatment system disclosures. (c) Deliver to Purchaser a standard form affidavit by the Sellers indicating that on the Date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Sellers or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic's liens could be filed; and that there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property. (d) Deliver to Purchaser a "bring- down" certificate, certifying that all of the representations made by Sellers in this Agreement remain true as of the Date of ( Closing, subject to exceptions or events occurring subsequent to this Purchase Agreement that are acceptable to Purchaser. 1779790 7 (e) Execute and deliver to Purchaser a waiver of relocation benefits as required under Section 4. 11. PURCHASER'S OBLIGATIONS AT CLOSING. At Closing and subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions hereof and the performance by Sellers of their obligations as set forth above, Purchaser shall: (a) Deliver to Sellers -by wire transfer the balance of the Purchase Price, less any adjustments. (b) Execute and/or deliver to Sellers such other documents as may be required by this Agreement or as may be reasonably required by Title Company. 12. CLOSING COSTS. The following costs and expenses shall be paid as follows in connection with the Closing: (a) Sellers shall pay: (1) Sellers' attorneys' fees; (2) The cost of preparing the Commitment; (3) The cost of recording the satisfaction of any existing mortgage and any other reasonable document(s) necessary to make title marketable; (4) The cost of preparation of the Deed and other documents of conveyance and the cost for state deed tax; (5) The cost of engineers or other consultants, if any, engaged by Purchaser regarding the Property. (6) Operating expenses relating to the Property incurred for the period prior to the Closing Date; and (7) One -half of the closing fee charged by Title Company for the Closing between Seller and Purchaser. (b) Purchaser shall pay the following costs in connection with the Closing: (1) The cost of the premium and endorsements issued pursuant to the Commitment. (2) Filing fee required to record the Deed, and costs and filing fees for documents to be recorded that are not required to be paid by Sellers. (3) Purchaser's attorneys' fees. 177979v1 8 (4) One -half of the closing fee charged by Title Company for the Closing between Seller and Purchaser. (5) The cost of engineers or other consultants, if any, engaged by Purchaser regarding the Property. 13. UTILITIES, TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. (a) Sellers shall pay all utilities, general real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable in the year prior to the Date of Closing and in years prior thereto. Utilities, real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable in and for the year of closing shall be prorated between Sellers and Purchaser on a calendar year basis to the actual Date of Closing; (b) Sellers shall pay all costs charged by the City pursuant to Section 24 -167 of the Edina City Code incurred during 2013, due and payable in 2014, and a pro rata portion of costs incurred during 2014 due and payable in 2015 based on the budgeted amount for the Property of $2,066.74 to the Date of Closing. (c) Purchaser shall pay utilities, real estate taxes and installments. of special assessments due and payable after the actual Date of Closing. 14. CONTROL OF PROPERTY. Prior to the Date of Closing, Sellers shall have the full responsibility and the entire liability for any and all damages or injuries of any kind whatsoever to the Property, ' to any and : all persons, whether employees or otherwise, except liability arising from the activities of Purchaser, its agents, contractors or employees. Any removable fixtures, equipment or personalproperty left at the Property after the Date of Closing, shall be considered ,abandoned by. Sellers and Purchaser shall be free to dispose of these items in any manner it chooses at its sole discretion. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement, Sellers shall indemnify, defend and hold Purchaser free and harmless from and against any and all claims; obligations and liability (and attorneys' fees and court costs in connection therewith) arising out of the Property or any portion thereof from any event, occurrence, act, or failure to act prior to Closing and Purchaser shall indemnify, defend and hold Sellers free and harmless from and against any and all claims, obligations and liability (and attorneys' fees and court costs in connection therewith), out of the Property or any portion thereof from any event, occurrence, act, or failure to act after Closing. 15. POSSESSION. Sellers shall deliver possession of the Property to Purchaser on the Date of Closing. 16. DEFAULT; REMEDIES. If Sellers have performed or are ready, willing and. able to perform all obligations required by this Agreement and Purchaser shall fail or refuse to perform this Agreement within the time and in the manner provided, then Sellers' � sole remedy shall be termination of this Agreement, in which case the parties shall have no further rights and obligations hereunder other than those rights and/or obligations which are expressly stated to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 177979v1 9 If Purchaser has performed or is ready, willing and able to perform all obligations required by this.Agreement and Sellers shall fail or refuse to perform this Agreement within the time and in the manner provided, then Purchaser, at its option may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice thereof to Sellers, in which case the parties shall have no further rights and obligations hereunder other than those rights and/or obligations which are expressly stated to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. The following general provisions govern this Agreement: (a) Time is of the Essence. The Date of Closing, as the same may be extended pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, is of the absolute essence. (b) Governing Law. This Agreement is made and executed under and in all respects is'to be governed and construed under the laws of the State of Minnesota. (c) Notices. Any notice required to be given to Sellers or Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement is given in accordance with this Agreement if it is in writing and if it is directed to Sellers by delivering it personally, or if it is directed to Purchaser, by delivering it personally to the Executive Director of Purchaser, or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized reputable overnight courier, property addressed as follows: Seller: Soon Yong and Jung Ja Park 5275 Grandview Square #3308 Edina, MN 55436 Purchaser: Edina HRA Attn: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 With a copy to: Andrea McDowell Poehler Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt. or the date of deposit as aforesaid, provided, however, that if notice is given by deposit, the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by giving written notice of such change to the other party, in any manner above specified, 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. (d) Purchaser's Waiver Rights. Purchaser may, at its option, waive any right conferred upon the Purchaser by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided 177979v1 10 herein, such waiver may be made only by giving Sellers written notice specifically describing the right waived. (e) Survival. Except as otherwise stated herein, all of the terms of this Agreement will survive and be enforceable for a period of two (2) years after the Closing. (f) Amendment: This Agreement shall be amended only by a written instrument signed by Sellers and Purchaser. (g) Brokerage. Each party hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless of any claim made by a broker or sales agent or similar party for a commission due or alleged t6, be due on this transaction on the basis of an agreement with said broker made by the indemnifying party. The parties' obligations set forth in this section shall survive termination or consummation of this Agreement. (h) Assi ment. Except for an assignment by Sellers to The Park Property, LLC, neither Sellers nor Purchaser shall assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the express written consent of the other, which may be withheld by the other in its sole discretion. (i) Benefit. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Sellers and Purchaser and their respective successors and assigns (j) Construction. The captions and headings of the various sections of this Agreement are for convenience only and are not to be construed as defining or as limiting in any way the scope or intent of the provisions hereof. Wherever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, the plural shall include singular, and the masculine, feminine and neuter shall be freely interchangeable. (k) Counterparts. For the convenience of the parties, any number of counterparts hereof may be executed and each such executed counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one in the same Agreement. (1) IRC 1033. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with Sellers in Sellers' quest for tax deferral pursuant to Section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Sellers acknowledge that any exchange shall be at no cost to Purchaser and shall not release or diminish Sellers' obligations and liability under this Agreement. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 177979vl 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall evidence but one agreement. SELLERS: Soon Yong Park Jung Ja Park S -1 1779790 PURCHASER: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: James B. Hovland, Its Chair And: Scott Neal, Its Executive Director S -2 177979v1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description. of Property The East 85 feet of the West 120 feet of the East 172 feet of the South 150 feet of the North '/2 of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision Number 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A -1 177979v1 EXHIBIT B Agreement Regarding Release, Payment and Assignment of Relocation Benefits THIS AGREEMENT REGARDING WAIVER AND ASSIGNMENT OF RELOCATION BENEFITS' (this "Agreement") is made as of , 2014, by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Purchaser ")and SOON YONG PARK and JUNG JA PARK, husband and' wife, ( "Sellers "). RECITALS: Sellers and Purchaser entered into a purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement ") dated as of , 2014, related to property located at 3944 West 49 %Z Street, Edina, Minnesota. Sellers have been advised of their rights and payments that Sellers may be eligible to receive pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (the "Act "), including payments for Minimum Compensation under Minn. Stat. 117.87. Sellers acknowledge they have sought and received the advice of legal counsel and have been specifically advised as to relocation, moving, reestablishment, and other costs that may be available to the Sellers under the Act. Sellers and Purchaser desire to enter into this Agreement to confirm their understanding of the Sellers' release, sale and assignment of any claim for any relocation benefits and/or other relocation costs due or payable to Sellers, whether pursuant to the Act or otherwise. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective as of the date hereof, Sellers hereby acknowledge that the sale of the Property is voluntary sale and not under threat of condemnation and the payment of the Purchase Price does not includes payment for Relocation Benefits and Minimum Compensation Benefits and hereby release Purchaser from any liability for payment of additional relocation payments pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. 2. Effective as of the date hereof, Sellers hereby sell, transfer and assign to- Purchaser any benefits, payments, claims, or other rights due or payable to Sellers pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. 3 volition. 177979v1 Sellers. acknowledge that they have freely waived such rights of their own In C • 1 4. Sellers acknowledge that they have waived such rights with full knowledge of the specific relocation benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled. 5. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 6. This Agreement shall be null iihd void if the Purchase Agreement shall terminate or if Closing under the Purchase Agreement shall fail to-occur for any reason. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Waiver of Relocation Benefits.,. Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first.above written. SELLERS: Soon Yong Park Jung Ja Park PURCHASER: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: And: James B. Hovland, Its Chair Scott Neal, Its Executive Director 177979v1 B -2 `, Wilder _ 2012 MINNESO'I:A .SC� Research HOMF,LFSS STUDY Information. Insight. Impact. FACT SHEET Y„ Initial findings: Characteristics and trends People experiencing homelessness in Minnesota Every three years, Wilder Research conducts a statewide study to better understand the prevalence, causes, circumstances, and effects of homelessness. This fact sheet provides initial findings from interviews with homeless people conducted on October 25, 2012. Homelessness in Minnesota is at an all -time high, although the rate of growth has slowed ® Overall, 10,214 homeless adults, youth, and children were counted, up 6 percent over 2009. The 6% increase between 2009 and 2012 follows a jump of 25% between 2006 and 2009. ° There was a slight increase (4 %) in the total number of families experiencing homelessness, but a 22% increase in the number of two- parent homeless families. 2012 ONE -NIGHT COUNTS IN METRO AREA AND GREATER MINNESOTA, BY AGE GROUP* 3,066 `.<rt 2,443 aMetro 1,642 66% (N= 6,711) 1,103 o Greater MN 664 487 538 239 34% (N= 3,471) ohm Y, N =1,151 N =4,708 N =777 N =3,546 Unaccompanied Adults (22 -54) Older adults Children (under 18) tR youth (21 and under) (55 and over) with their parents 'Total also includes 32 homeless people (of unknown age) in detox on the night of the survey. Availability of affordable housing is still a critical issue ° 41 % of homeless adults are on a waiting list for subsidized housing, with an average wait time of 1 I months; another 15% were unable to get on a waiting list because it was closed. 33% of youth on their own and 30% of adults spent at least one night sleeping outside in the 30 -day period, before the study. Most common reasons adults left their last housing: 38% could not afford it, 32% lost their job or had their hours cut, and 29% were evicted. m 83% of homeless adults have been in Minnesota at least 2 years or lived here previously. SHELTER TYPE, ADULTS AND YOUTH Adults Youth Emergency shelters .,, Interviews were conducted ■ Battered women's shelters in all shelter types and with c ' s ' those who w Transitional housing 2% s were not m shelters. 4 i (N =27) 32% ■ Not in shelter 360 (N =1,731) Y' 5% L A (N =417) (N_2671 I () woc:lc-t.e� African Americans and American Indians are disproportionately affected 2 Percent of unaccompanied Percent of all Percent of Percent of all HOMELESS youth Minnesota youth HOMELESS adults Minnesota adults' age 21 and under .10-24* American Indian 10% -.1% 12% 2% Asian American 1% 4% 1% 66/6 Black/African American 37% 5% 37% 7% White /Caucasian 39% 86% 30% 76% OtherNixed race 5% 3% 10% 6% Hispanic (any race) 7% 4% 10% 7% ' Source of information for all Minnesotans. U. S. Census Adults (age 18 and older) Childhood histories of trauma and long -term health issues are common ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES Adults LONG -TERM HEALTH ISSUES Adults Physically abused as a child 37% Chronic physical health condition 51% Sexually abused as a child 26% Significant mental illness 55% Neglected as a child 21% Substance abuse disorder 22% Out-of -home placements' as a child . 36% Evidence of traumatic brain injury 31% At least one of the above 58% At least one of the above 79% ' Out-of -home placements include foster care, treatment facilities, and juvenile detention Many have experienced violence and sexual exploitation Adults VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL EXPLOITATION Female Male Women homeless due to domestic violence 30% — Stayed in an abusive situation due to no other housing options 48% 22% Physically or sexually attacked while homeless 26% 12% Been sexual with someone only for the purpose of getting shelter, clothing, or food 17% 14% At least one of the above 54% 34% Notable trends for adults, 2000 -2012 EMPLOYMENT 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Adults employed at the time of the survey 41% 30% 28% 20% 24% Adults working full -time (35+ hourstweek) 26% 13% 12% 6% 8% SCHOOL -AGE CHILDREN'S SCHOOL ATTENDANCE 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Parents: any child has difficulty attending school due to housing situation 13% 8% 6% 11% 13% Parents: all school -age children attended today 88% 88% 90% 84% 87% 2 Youth on their own (age 21 and younger) Young people age 21 and under are the most likely to be homeless. Nearly 3 out of 10 youth on their own (29 %) are parents, and 21 % have children with them. Nearly 4 in 10 youth on their own were found outside of the shelter system. Fifty -eight percent of 19 -21 year olds had completed high school or received their GED. Childhood histories of trauma and long -term health issues are common ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES Unaccompanied youth age 21 and younger LONG -TERM HEALTH ISSUES Unaccompanied youth age 21 and younger Physically, abused as a child 44% CHRONIC HEALTH CONDITIONS 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Adults with serious mental illness 36% 47% 52% 55% 55% Adults with chronic physical health conditions 39% 43% 44% 46% 51% Adults with a substance abuse disorder 22% 25% 276/6 23% 22% POPULATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN TARGETED FOR PERMANENT HOUSING SOLUTIONS 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Single chronically homeless adults - Metro area N.A. 36% 37% 40% 38% Single chronically homeless adults - Greater MN N.A. 25% 25% 26% 22% Veterans - Metro area 14% 13% 12% 12% 9% Veterans - Greater MN 24% 18% 15% 9% 10% LENGTH OF TIME HOMELESS 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Adults: homeless less than 1 month 10% 11% 9% 8% 6% Adults: homeless 1 year or more 37% 44% 47% 52% 50% Adults: homeless 3 years or more 16% 17% 20% 22% 23% Youth on their own (age 21 and younger) Young people age 21 and under are the most likely to be homeless. Nearly 3 out of 10 youth on their own (29 %) are parents, and 21 % have children with them. Nearly 4 in 10 youth on their own were found outside of the shelter system. Fifty -eight percent of 19 -21 year olds had completed high school or received their GED. Childhood histories of trauma and long -term health issues are common ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES Unaccompanied youth age 21 and younger LONG -TERM HEALTH ISSUES Unaccompanied youth age 21 and younger Physically, abused as a child 44% Chronic physical health condition 36% Sexually abused, as a child 27% Significant mental illness 52% Neglected as a child 31% Substance abuse disorder 16% Ever in out-of -home placements 58% Evidence of traumatic brain injury 23% At least one of the above 77% At least one of the above 69% Has a parent who has been incarcerated 60% 'Out -of -home placements include foster care, treatment facilities, and juvenile detention Many have experienced violence and sexual exploitation VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL EXPLOITATION Female youth homeless due to domestic violence Stayed in an abusive situation due to no other housing options Physically or sexually attacked while homeless Been sexual with someone only for the purpose of getting shelter, clothing or food _.... _. At least one of the above Unaccompanied youth age 21 and younger Female Male 28% — 35% 24% 17% 15% 18% 44% 39% rw. ° Notable trends for youth, 2000 -2012 :{ EMPLOYMENT 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 M Fi L k S T H. WILDER FMuNnaTinn ” 1.., "I I It • ., ,. Youth employed at the time of the survey 34% 33 %. 32% 27% 31% '? Youth working full -time (35+ hourstweek) 12% 7% 10% 6% 8% MINOR YOUTH'S SCHOOL ATTENDANCE 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Unaccompanied youth (17 or under): enrolled in school 78% 84% 89% 90% 95% Unaccompanied youth (17 or under): attended today 48% 65% 67% 60% 69% CHRONIC HEALTH CONDITIONS 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Youth with serious mental illness 38% 43% 49% 46% 52% r s , Youth with chronic physical hea0h conditions` 30% 31% 33% 32% '36%, Youth with substance abuse disorder 14% 15% 16% 12% 16% LENGTH OF TIME HOMELESS 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Youth: homeless less than 1 month 17% 18% 18% 13% 11% Youth: homeless 1 year or more 29% 34% 31% 38% 43% More from the homeless study 'rY More detailed data tables for each 2012 survey question and counts of homeless persons are available at littp://�,,Aw.wilder.orgMilder- Research / Research- Aress[Homelessness /Panes /Statewide - Homeless- Study- Detailed- Data.asox). Data tables include breakdowns by geographic regions of the state, and by shelter types and gender. Reports with detailed information about background and characteristics of homeless Minnesotans, as well as specialized reports on homeless youth, veterans, older adults, families, and long -term homeless populations will be released throughout 2013 and made available on our website. „. Sires -� T! .54=A-Cow A1104 e 41177-1 77&Me W �O' ou7' Tfl� L2-/ `SS T off' SSE << A/- 0 �cA2 it? IGftL % �QC/G/ T /ET Wilder For more information Research For more information about this report, contact Wilder Research at 651 - 2804700. Information. Insight. Impact 451 L ean on Parkway North gt Y Saint Paul, Mnnesota 55104 M Fi L k S T H. WILDER FMuNnaTinn ” 1.., "I I It • ., ,. Authors: Michelle Gerrard, Ellen Shelton, Brian Pittman, Greg Owen APRIL 2013 651- 280 -2700 Here for good. www.vAlderresearch.org Aft