Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-09-16_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY DAY" "SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 7:00. P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of . such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.), A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of September 2, 2014, And Work Session Of September 2, 2014 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 9/04/20.14 TOTAL $1,615,772.56 And Per Pre -List Dated 9/11/2104 TOTAL $1,264,669.67 C.' Resolution 2014 -97 Appointing Election Judges For November 4, 2014 General Election D. _ Resolution 2014 -96 Setting October 21, 2014 Special Assessment Public Hearings E. Approve Amended Website Links Policy F. Request For Purchase — Edina Liquor 50th Street Store Remodeling Project G. Request For Purchase - Consulting Services Braemar Master Plan And Stormwater And Natural Resources Plan. H. Request For Purchase — Contract ENG 14 -17NB — 2014 Watermain Repair Street Patching I. Request For Purchase — Engineering Services For Lift Station No. 6 Rehabilitation J. Resolution No. 2614 -98 Authorizing York Avenue Sidewalk Cooperative Agreement With Hennepin County K. Resolution No. 2014 -99 Authorizing Vernon Avenue Sidewalk Cooperative Agreement With Hennepin County L. Ordinance No. 2014 -15 Amending Chapter 12 Of The Code Concerning Taxicabs and Taxicab Drivers M. Set December 2, 2014 Public Hearing Date for 20.15 Levy & Budget N. Resolution No. 2014 -102 Authorizing Grant Application To Hennepin County For Agenda/Edina City Council September 16, 2014 Page 2 TOD Infrastructure Planning O. Resolution No. 2014 -103 Setting Public Improvements Hearing, October 21, 2014, Valley View Road Reconstruction P. Approve Amendment To Edina School District 273 Communications Site Lease, Community Water Tower, ` V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Speak Up Edina — Community Gardens VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not.,to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING - Consider Vacation Of Public Right -of -Way, 7151 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2014 -101 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. 'Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on, tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2014 -100 Setting Preliminary 2015 Budget & Levy B. Resolution No. 2014 -95 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Agenda/Edina City Council September 16, 2014 Page 3 C. Selection of Grandview Development Partner D. Approve Development Contract With City Homes Development, LLC For Acres DuBois Development IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Edina Community Health Advisory Communication C. Minutes Heritage Preservation Board June 10, July 8, & August 11, 2014 Human Rights & Relations Commission, July 22, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS 9:30 p.m. X111. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sep 16 Work Session — Grandview Development Partner Discussion 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 16 Joint Session With Heritage Preservation Board 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 7 Work Session — 2015 Boards/Commission Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tue Oct 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 21 Rep. Keith Ellison Update 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Business Meeting 5:45 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tree Ordinance 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tue Oct 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 3 Work Session — Future IQ Update 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Nov. 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov. 4 GENERAL ELECTION DAY — Polls Open 7 A.M. Through 8:00 P.M. Fri Nov 7 Canvass of General Election 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tus Nov I I VETERANS' DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Tues Nov 18 Work Session — Ethics Policy 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Human Services Task Force 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thurs Nov 27 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 28 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED City Hall Closed Tues Dec 2 Work Session — Donations and Sponsorships 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 16 Work Session — 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Thur Dec 25 CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Wed Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 4:04 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 4:13 p.m. Member Bennett entered the meeting at 4:15 p.m. Staff attending the meeting included: Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott. Neal, City Manager; and Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager. Mayor Hovland noted the purpose of the work session was to interview potential development partners for the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf explained that he would be introducing each of the teams making presentations from the four Request For Proposal RFP respondents that were being interviewed. He noted that.ten development teams responded to the RFP issued in. June. An ad hoc committee city staff from Administration, Community Development, Economic Development, Parks & Recreation and Engineering reviewed the responses. The evaluation was based on eleven measures. The four firms being interviewed rose to the top of those submitting responses. The following four teams each made a brief presentation followed by questions and answers with the City Council: DORAN Mr. Kelly Doran, Principal of the Doran Companies presented his team including: Bruce Carlson, Curt Martinson John Wodele and Anne Behrendt of Doran Companies; Aaron Roseth and Trace Jacques of Elness Swenson Graham (ESG) Architects; and Dan Parks from Westwood Professional Services. FRAUENSHUH - Mr. Dave Anderson, Senior Vice President presented his team including: David Frauenshuh and Dean Williamson of Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group; Matt Rauenhorst and Dean Newins of Opus Companies; Dennis Reynolds with Reynolds Urban Design; and Terry Minarek with Confluence. GRECO - Mr. Arnie Gregory, Owner and President presented his team including: Brent Rogers of Greco, LLC; Jack Owen Boarman, Michael Krych and Gretchen Camp of BKV Group architects. KRAUS- ANDERSON - Mr. Mike Korsh, Vice President presented his team including: Doug Jandro of Kraus Anderson; Bob Cunningham of Melrose Company; and Art Bartels of ESG Architects. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 16, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda as revised to add Item V.A., Recognition of Finance Director John Wallin, and to move Item VII., Community Comment, in advance of Item VI., Public Hearings. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda. IV.A. Approve regular, closed, and work session meeting minutes of August 19, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 21, 2014, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $234,434.94; Police Special Revenue $11,608.42; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $21,520.00; Working Capital Fund $644,380.20; Equipment Replacement Fund $45,984.00; Art Center Fund $668.70; Golf Dome Fund $55.34; Aquatic Center Fund $15,746.77; Golf Course Fund $47,455.02; Ice Arena Fund $12,980.43; Edinborough Park Fund $2,824.16; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $6,039.67; Liquor Fund $172,198.47; Utility Fund $365,674.75; Storm Sewer Fund $188,479.02; Recycling Fund $800.00; PSTF Agency Fund $571.85; Centennial TIF District $1,845.00; TOTAL $1,773.266.74 and for receipt of payment of claims dated August 24, 2014, and consisting of 41 pages; General Fund $278,666.02; Police Special Revenue $7,986.05; Braemar Memorial Fund $3,006.44; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $80,919.11; Arts and Culture Fund $219.45; Working Capital Fund $257,291.1 1; Equipment Replacement Fund $19,150.67; Art Center Fund $12,148.79; Golf Dome Fund $206.74; Aquatic Center Fund $4,667.74; Golf Course Fund $20,588.74; Ice Arena Fund $10,374.42; Edinborough Park Fund $6,003.98; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,226.72; Liquor Fund $181,636.89; Utility Fund $379,060.24; Storm Sewer Fund $85,535.95; PSTF Agency Fund $6,067.90; TOTAL $1.355.786.96 ; and, Credit Card Transactions dated June 27, 2014 - July 26, 2014; TOTAL $38.950.08 IV.C. Set Date for Canvass of Municipal Election for November 7, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. IV.D. Request for Purchase - Replace Triple Wave Slide at Adventure Peak, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, On Call Services at $26,300.00 IV.E. Request for Purchase - Renovation of Lower Level of Adventure Peak, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, On Call Services at $18,800.00 IV.F. Approve Authorization to Participate in 2015 -2016 Fuel Consortium IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -88, Approving Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis Regarding Utility Services IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -89, Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -90, Authorizing Investment Agreement Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council /September 2, 2014 IV.). Request for Purchase — Security Cameras and Building Card Access for Braemar Athletic Complex, awarding the bid to recommended bidder, Pro -Tec Design at $48,436.38 IV.K. Request for Purchase — Consulting Services for Park System Master Plan, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Confluence Group at $94,000.00 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. FINANCE DIRECTOR JOHN WALLIN — RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland recognized Finance Director John Wallin for his exemplary service noting Mr. Wallin was retiring on September 4, 2014 after 30 years of service. Mayor Hovland read in full the Resolution of Commendation for Mr. Wallin. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, adopting the Resolution of Commendation for Finance Director John Wallin. Mayor Hovland presented the resolution to Director Wallin while audience and staff gave him an ovation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council thanked Mr. Wallin and offered him a standing ovation. V.B. FRANCE AVENUE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT— PRESENTED Mike Fischer, representative of LHB, presented urban design elements for the France Avenue Corridor Improvement Project. The urban design incorporated elements of enhanced pedestrian crossings, landscaping, and lighting that focused on the intersections of 66th Street, 70th Street, 76th Street, and France Avenue. If supported, implementation strategies would be defined. The Council questioned the timing for installment. Engineer Millner reported the project should be complete by the end of October. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. V1. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. TEMPORARY INTOXICATING ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE, CHURCH OF ST. PATRICK 6820 ST. PATRICK LANE, SEPTEMBER 27, 2014 — APPROVED Police Chief Nelson presented the request of the Church of St. Patrick for a Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for its "Oktoberfest" event and recommendation for approval. It was noted that the Church of St. Patrick had hired the Edina Police Department to provide security for this event. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the Temporary Intoxicating On -Sale Liquor License for the Church of St. Patrick's, Oktoberfest on September 27, 2014, from 6:15 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 2, 2014 Motion carried. VI.B. CONSIDER VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY, PORTION OF WEST 41ST STREET — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -91 ADOPTED Engineer Millner presented the request from the property owner of 4022 Monterey Avenue to vacate the northern 30 feet of right -of -way. If approved, the City would retain the southern 20 feet of the 41 st Street right -of -way for existing and future utility alignments. It would also be available for potential future trail connections between Monterey Avenue and Natchez Avenue or the Susan B. Lindgren Elementary School. The property owner wanted the ability to maintain this area without having to worry about installation of City infrastructure. The Council asked questions of staff. Engineer Millner stated 20 feet was adequate for a future pathway or trail because a cut - through or paved trail would be no more than 10 feet wide. Attorney Knutson indicated the property owner could change the grade unless it impacted drainage. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -91, Vacating a Portion of West 41 st Street. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, ALLOW FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OF MORE THAN ONE FOOT ABOVE EXISTING FLOOR, 4603 ANNAWAY DRIVE, NICOLE AND GREG JENNINGS — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -92 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of the applicants who were proposing to tear down the existing house and construct a new house at 4603 Annaway Drive. A Conditional Use Permit was requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new house to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing house by more than one foot. The applicant was proposing to raise the first floor elevation 4.4 above the existing first floor elevation for the purpose of the low floor elevation to be at least 2 feet above the 100 -year flood elevation. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit on August 13, 2014, subject to findings and conditions as contained in the staff report. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council pertaining to the basement ceiling height, the actual height of the house, and stated the site drainage had been reviewed and found it would improve existing conditions and not create negative impacts to neighboring properties. Proponent Presentation Kathryn Alexander, architect representing the proponent, clarified that the actual height of the house was 37 feet TA inches to the peak of the roof. She offered to answer questions. David Bieker, Denali Custom Homes representing the proponent, added that an underground water drainage system had been designed. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 2. 2014 Member.Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -92, Approving a Conditional Use Permit at 4603 Annaway Drive for Nicole and Greg Jennings, subject to the following conditions: I. The site must be developed and - maintained in conformance with the following plans:_ • Survey date stamped June 23, 2014 • Building plans and elevations date stamped June 23, 2014 2.. Compliance with the conditions and comment listed in .the Environmental Engineer's memo dated August 1, 2014. , Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY REZONING POD - 1 TO PUD, BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE, 3330 .WEST 66TH STREET— RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -93 AND RESOLUTION 2014 -94 — ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request from Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow affordable housing: in the Regional Medical District. The applicant also requested preliminary rezoning from Planned Office .District -I ::to Planned Unit Development and approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. The .proponent proposed to remodel and - expand the existing TCF Bank building located at 3330 66th Street into 39 affordable housing units of small studio apartments for young adults who had experienced homelessness. There would be 19 surface parking stalls and proof -of- parking for 37 total surface stalls. Mr. Teague- presented details of the proposal. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the Comprehensive . Plan Amendment, but recommended instead approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment that would incorporate language into the Comprehensive Plan that would allow this type of project. The Planning Commission also suggested approval of preliminary rezoning from Planned Office' District -I to Planned Unit Development. Staff offered four Comprehensive Plan wording options for Council consideration, and recommended Option 3, correcting the density wording to reflect 'senior housing and affordable housing' rather than `specialty housing.' . Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to the definition of `specialty housing,' ability to write specific housing type as well as potential appropriate future uses within the PUD, adequacy of parking, and rezoning if the site was used for another purpose. Proponent Presentation Lee Blons, Executive Director of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, - presented the request to develop 66 West as affordable housing (apartments) for homeless youth. sf"1s �Blons described Beacon as an experienced developer of quality housing, shared its vision, and belief Jwthe:::power of 'home.' The project involved many local churches including Edina Community Luthei`46' Church as the lead congregation. Ms. Blons shared the requirements for each tenant, supportive .services that would be provided to tenants, development costs, site attributes, and availability of funding:._ .Ms. Blons asked the Council to support the change necessary to the Comprehensive Plan and, PUD to allow affordable housing for young people at 66 West to become a reality. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:24 p.m. Public Testimony Page 4 Minutes /Edina Ci4— Council /September 2, 2014 Mark Chamberlain, 7004.Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Council. Edward Schuck, 395 Lake Street West, Wayzata, addressed the Council. Ruth Lordan, 6453 Barrie Road, addressed the Council. Senator Melisa Franzen, 6216 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Council. Rose Minor, Step by Step Montessori School, 6519 Barrie Road, addressed the Council. Dr. William Davis, 6616 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Mike Nelson, 5329 61 st Street West, addressed the Council:: Bishop Ann Svennungsen, 301 Clifton Avenue, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Dr. Elizabeth Briden, 6525 Barrie Road, addressed the Council. Thomas Stone, 3710 Nicollet Avenue South, Apartment 204, addressed the Council. Tom Nelson, Kenwood Lowry Hill Neighborhood, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Mikkel Beckmen, 5332 Freemont Avenue South, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Robert Long, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Jeanette Auguston, 5000 Arden Avenue, addressed the Council. John Crane, 5610 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Council. Lisa Thompson, 5500 Benton Avenue, addressed the Council. ;Rita Babcock; 12500 Briarwood Terrace, Minnetonka, addressed the Council. Floyd Grabiel, 4817 Wilford Way, addressed the Council. Lauren Morsels Wend , 1449 Frankson Avenue, St. Paul, addresse&the Council. Betsy Cussler, 5825 Vernon Lane, addressed the Council. Daniel Tysver, 2104 53rd Street West, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Andrea Knoll, 4601 Arden Avenue, addressed the Council. Maura Schnorbach, 6221 Balder Lane, addressed the Council. Dr. Ward Godsall, 5601 Johnson Drive, addressed the Council. Dr. Helen Wood, 6525 Drew Avenue South, addressed the Council. Robert Hobbins, 4708 Upper Terrace, addressed the Council. Pastor Erik Strand, 4113 54th Street West, addressed the Council. Mark Swiggum, 7234 Ticonderoga Trail, Eden Prairie, addressed the Council. Page 5 0 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 2, 2014 David Vandongen, 5620 Kellogg Place, addressed the Council. Eileen Supple, 7332 West Shore Drive, addressed the Council. Father Tim Rudolphi, 6820 St. Patrick Lane, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 20.14 -93, Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Allow Additional Housing in the RMD, Regional Medical District and Resolution No. 2014 -94, Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned. Office District -I, to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan for 3330 66th Street. Motion died for lack of a second. The Council asked. Police Chief Nelson questions relating to safety and security. He reported the Police Department received an average of 19 to 20 calls for service per year from Nicollet Square, a similar Beacon establishment. The Council asked Attorney Knutson questions relating to the application. Mr. Knutson answered that the deadline for Final Rezoning was October 7, 2014. With regard to the comment on spot zoning, he explained it was irrational zoning with no basis or foundation, such as zoning to favor a proponent. Ms. Blons responded to the Council's questions relating to the psychological needs of the residents. The Council also asked Ms. Blons if 66 West would staff a 24 -hour desk like Nicollet Square. Ms. Blons answered that staff would be present at night and on weekends, but Beacon had hoped to not be required to provide 24 -hour care. However, Beacon would provide that service if the Council desired. Sara Larson, Beacon Project Manager, explained that TCF Bank had approached realtors that had previously expressed interest and called" Beacon's broker. Ms. Blons reviewed the search process to find this site, the cost effectiveness of this site, findings of the parking study, and adequacy of parking. The Council and Ms. Blons discussed the issue of security and staffing hours. It was noted the building would have a security system, requiring a secured key card to enter. The Council expressed a desire to have 66 West staffed 24 hours per day for the first year and agreed to add it as a condition of approval. Following additional discussion, Attorney Knutson explained that in order to rezone the property back to POD -1, the Council would complete the same process and the City would be the applicant. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -93, Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Allow Additional Housing in the RMD, Regional Medical District, utilizing proposed language Option 3. Member Swenson seconded the motion. The Council recognized the need to provide workforce housing, importance of•..addressing the needs of homeless youth, some of the most vulnerable among us, and appropriateness of this site for Beacon's worthwhile project. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -94, Preliminary Rezoning from POD -I, Planned Office District -1, to PUD; Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan for 3330 66th Street, subject to the following conditions: Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 2 � 014 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated June 20,2014. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire projectmust be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's ` narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. 3. All buildings must be built with, sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 15, 2014. S. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to review and approval of the Metropolitan Council on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 9. For the first year of operation, the facility shall have 24 -hour staffing, seven days a week. Staffing may be provided by adult volunteers. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT This item was considered prior to Item VI. Public Hearings. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -87 ADOPTED - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -87 accepting various grants and donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMUNICATION — Received IX.C. MINUTES: 1. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JULY 17, 2014 2. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JULY 10, 2014 3. PLANNING COMMISSION, JULY 23, 2014 Informational; no action required. X AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 2, 2014 X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor-Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 16, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 2, 2014, meeting available. Page 8 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 197 9/4/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 95.40 351701 1821519 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 62.40 351700 1821527 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 90.00 351868 1822572 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 247.80 198 914/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 349.40 COFFEE 351936. 1140504 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL . 349.40 199 914/2014 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 132.00 351869 44519300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING, 132.00 351702 44519500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 513.20 352086 44607100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 235.10 352088 44607200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 44.00 352087 44607800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 186.05 351703 90648000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 75.00 351870 90750800 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,317.35 l 200 9/4/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 251.95 FILE POCKETS OE- 365953 -1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 112.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 351764 W0= 948874 -1 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 91.96 ENVELOPES 351615 WO- 953823 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 75.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003080 351939 WO- 955209 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 531.64 201 9/4/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 238.02 PAD AND LINING KIT 00005599 . 352049 882784 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 237.00 OIL SEALS, SLACK ADJUSTMENTS, 00005599 352050 882784X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 432.48 ROTORS 00005599 352051 882784X2 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 155.16 HUB CAPS 00005533 351767 883796X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.21 BRAKE CHAMBER 00005534 351766 883933 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.04 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005601 351765 884125 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.20 FILTERS 00005536 351768 884186 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.32 FILTERS, HUB CAPS 00005604 351769 884960 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.76- CREDIT 352057 CM857380 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.56- CREDIT 352055 CM865291 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.63- CREDIT 352056 CM868156 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.44- CREDIT 352052 CM868155A 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.44- CREDIT 352053 CM 868335 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 L06IS101 351708 766881 5822.5514 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 43.80 351707 766882 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register by GL 2,695.85 351709 766883 5842.5514 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 201 9/4/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 515.63- CREDIT 351770 CM871824 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270.64- CREDIT 352054 CM872546 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 559.33 202 9/412014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 307.75 MATERIALS TESTING 351619 B005712 10098.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 307.75 MATERIALS TESTING 351619 B005712 10099.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 6,037.00 MATERIALS TESTING 351771 B005901 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,286.00 MATERIALS TESTING 351617 B005904 01411.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 55.78 MATERIALS TESTING 351618 B005912 01407.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 55.78 MATERIALS TESTING 351618 B005912 01408.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 334.69 MATERIALS TESTING 351618 B005912 01409.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5,583.75 MATERIALS TESTING 351772 B005926 01417.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 14,968.50 203 9/4/2014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 121.77 JULY 2014 USAGE 351620 988287089 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 534.98 JULY 2014 USAGE 351621 988287090 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 656.75 204 9/4/2014 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 232.00 XCEL ENERGY BILLING AUG 2014 352059 5961 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 232.00 206 9/4/2014 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 1,091.45 SENSORS 352031 157154 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,091.45 206 9/4/2014 104020 DALCO 353.26 MOPS, WYPALL, CLEANER 00001684 351625 2783253 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 269.77 GRILL CLEANER, BLEACH 351956 2784761 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 623.03 207 9/4/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page- 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BR8 78TH STREET BRIDGE REHAB BR9 GUS YOUNG BRIDGE REHAB FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON WARDEN AVE WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING INSPECTIONS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC, PW BUILDING GRILL 464.60 351708 766881 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 43.80 351707 766882 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,695.85 351709 766883 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 351710 766884 5842.5515 351874 766885 5862.5514 4,875:00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST &'GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 'LOGIS101 CITY Or - ,jINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 207 9/4/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Continued... 208 9/4/2014 100720 DEN NYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 43.40 BAKERY 351958 519290 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 67.56 351959 519644 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - 83.29 351960 519645 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 194.25 209 9/4/2014 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 351824 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 19.50 210 9/4/2014 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 142.14 REGISTER PAPER 351783 128184 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 213.22 THERMAL ROLLS 00007516 351977 128229 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 355.36 211 9/4/2014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 3,582.08 MAILAUG 2014 BILLS 351632. 93041 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,582.08 212 9/412014 132692 J.F. AHERN CO. 1,400.00 GOLF DOME FINAL 351850 101623 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1.400.00 213 9/412014 121076 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 106.87 TOILET RENTAL 351987 79863. 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 351988 80188 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 351784 60189 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 209.87 _ - 214 9/4/2014 120866 LLOYD'S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1,001.30 GOLF DOME FINAL 351853 BP1 -31 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 4,184.85 GOLF DOME FINAL 351854 BPI- 31ASITE 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5,186.15 215 9/4/2014 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,461.93 351892 180053 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,461.93 216 914/2014 101483 MENARDS' 9/21 - .4 10:24:59 Page- 3 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 1 RICHARDS.GOLF COURSE LITTER REMOVAL LITTER - REMOVAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET. GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary ' 9/412014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 216 9/4/2014 101483 MENARDS Continued... 59.91 SHRINK WRAP 351994 57900 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 179.98 LP GAS CYLINDERS 00001535 351995 63011 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.84 HORNET SPRAY, HOSE FITTINGS 00006227 351996 64705 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS " 265.73 217 9/4/2014 100898 MINVALCO 965.55 BOILER RELIEFS 00001571 351640 955783 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 965.55 218 9/4/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. _ 308.51 BLADES 00005633 351799 979423 -00 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 308.51 219 9/4/2014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 366.50 TIRES 00005559 351805 210132166 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 366.50 220 9/4/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 309.76 TISSUE, LINER ROLLS 352010 7150 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 62.19 POPCORN BAGS, PLATES 352009 7151 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 688.05 TOWELS, LINERS, GLOVES 00002236 352008 7163 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ' 1,060.00 221 9/4/2014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 708.00 RESET URINAL 351645 16825 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 708.00 222 9/4/2014 104672 SPRINT . 13.16 351927 873184124 -141 1553.6188 TELEPHONE : EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 16.48 351927 873184124-141 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 35.00 351927 873184124 -141 1280.6188 TELEPHONE SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 48.48 351927 873184124 -141 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 48.98 351927 873184124 -141 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 56.84 351927 873184124 -141 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.69 351927 873184124 -141 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 93.12 351927 873184124 -141 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 174.62 351927 873184124 -141 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 279.93 351927 873184124 -141 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 313.96 351927 673184124 -141 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 437.89 351927 873184124 -141 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2- LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 222 9/4/2014 104672 SPRINT Continued... 26.81 351927 873184124 -141 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 16.48 351927 873184124 -141 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 355.48 351927 873184124 -141 5910.6188 TELEPHONE -9.17 351927 873184124 -141 7411.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE DUES'& SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES 912/2014 10:24:59 Page - 5 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PIN BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,009.09 223 9/4/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 155.18 COPPER TUBING, PARTS 00001681 351659 S2954370.001 1552.6406 10.08 PARTS FOR BOILER 00001693 352071 52954883.001 1551.6406 165.26 224 9/412014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 2,900.00 WORK LIGHT 00001487 352020 4479371 5913.6406 511.00 PIN ASSEMBLY, GASKETS 00005535 352073 4502128 1553.6530 3,411.00 226 91412014 101693, TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 1,012.64 DVR REPLACEMENT 351813 52060 5841.6180 1,012.64 226 9/4/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA 237.50 351729 0105361 -IN 5842.5515 237.50 351910 0105363 -IN 5862.5515 271.33 352110 0105607 -IN 5842.5512 89.50 352111 0105608 -IN 5842.5513 98.50 352112 01056.22 -IN 5862.5513 934.33 227 914/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 656.85 351911 370331 -00 5842.5513 268.40 351912 370335 -00 5862.5513 927.25 386333 9/4/2014 134776 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS INC. 360 .'00 351928 0000359349 1400.6105 475.00 351928 0000359349 1400.6406 835.00 386334 9/4/2014 133164 AAA AUTO PARTS 225.00 SEATS 00005635 351762 1218674 1553.6585 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE DUES'& SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCESSORIES 912/2014 10:24:59 Page - 5 Business Unit 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PIN BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA. 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386334 9/4/2014 133164 AAAAUTOPARTS Continued... 225.00 386336 9/4/2014 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 58.38 VENTING PAD 00001691 352046 327322 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 58.38 386336 9/4/2014 129458 ACME TOOLS 109.98 TOOLS 00001695 351933 2827836 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 109.98 386337 9/4/2014 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 28.00 PEST CONTROL 351934 909014 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 28.00 386338 9/4/2014 132835 - ADCOCK, MARIAN. 5.14 ART WORK SOLD 351820 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.14 386339 9/4/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 77.70 351935 408220604 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 187.98 351935 408220604 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 507.44 351935 408220604 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 773.12 386340 9/4/2014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 394.15 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 351613 66121 01398.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINA B 394.15 386341 9/4/2014 132589 ARIZON STRUCTURES WORLDWIDE LLC 49,282.85 GOLF DOME FINAL 351846 APPL7R1 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 49,282.85 ' 386342- 914/2014 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 17.85 LIGHT LENSES 00001689 351937 10065888 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56.00 CEILING TILE 00001690 352047 10065889 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 73.85 386343 914/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 699.00 352085 63777 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 863.00 352082 63778 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 216.00 PIZZA 351938 D28IN2531 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 216.00 386348 9/4/2014 125139 BERNICK'S -" '- 352089 157126 5862.5514 351871 158675 5842.5514 386349 9/4/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 9/4/2014 .— 9/4/2014 P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386343 914/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 9/4/2014 124634 Continued... 44.75 4,270.00 352084 63780 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,270.00 101.50 352083 -63781 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 1,708.25 19,547.50 SEPT 2014 PREMIUMS 351940 386344 9/4/2014 131722 ATHENS TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS INC.. SEPT 2014 PREMIUMS 351940 11006 -9/14 630.00 CALIBRATION SERVICE 00001579 351763 INV1018215 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 119351 630.00 650.50 386345 9/4/2014 121631 121083 BARR, FRANK 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 351821 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 386346 9/4/2014 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 153.40 ART WORK SOLD 351822 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 153.40 386347 9/4/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 216.00 PIZZA 351938 D28IN2531 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 216.00 386348 9/4/2014 125139 BERNICK'S -" '- 352089 157126 5862.5514 351871 158675 5842.5514 386349 9/4/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 154.95 COFFEE 352048 1194486 154.95 386350 9/4/2014 124634 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 4,270.00 BASEMENT ROOF REPAIRS 351616 495 4,270.00 386351 9/4/2014 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 19,547.50 SEPT 2014 PREMIUMS 351940 11006 -9/14 186,058.50 SEPT 2014 PREMIUMS 351940 11006 -9/14 205,606.00 386352 9/4/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 650.50 351704 121631 1552.6406 44012.6710 1556.6043 1556.6040 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 9/2/2014 10:24:59 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary CANDY 351941 2340:036825 9/412014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386352 9/4/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 386364 Continued... 615.50 351872 121714 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 372.50 352091 121725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 121.50 352090 121755 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 386353 9/4/2014 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 164.55 CANDY 351941 2340:036825 5421.5510 164.55 386364 9/4/2014 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 90.79 GOLF BALLS 351942 1002277755 5440.5511 90.79 386355 9/4/2014 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 3.87 ART WORK SOLD 351823 082514 5101.4413 3.87 386356 9/4/2014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 358.54 GOLF CLUBS 351944 925424638 5440.5511 1,509.00 GOLF CLUBS 351943 925425407 5440.5511 551.25- CREDIT 351945 925437220 5440.5511 182.00- CREDIT 351946 925438493 5440.5511 1,134.29 q 386357 9/4/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,068.30 351706 394987 5842.5514 122.85 351705 399483 5842.5515 3,191.15 386358 9/4/2014 129923 CAWLEY 15.88 NAME BADGE 351622 V241020 1500.6103 15.88 386359 1 9/4/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 31.85 10089900 -4 351752 10089900 -8/14 1646.6186 223.72 5546504 -1 351753 5546504 -8/14 1470.6186 91.86 5563827 -4 351751 5563827 -8/14 5210.6186 1,596.11 5591458 -4 351754 5591458 -8/14. 1551.6186 18.16 5596524 -8 351755 5596524 -8/14 5430.6186 196.91 8034001 -1 351750 8034001 -8/14 1552.6186 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT CONTINGENCIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM CITY HALL GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386359 9/4/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY - Continued... 20.76 9546705 -6 351955 9546705 -8/14 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 647.59 9724639 -1 351749 ,9724639 -8/14 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,826.96 386360 9/4/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 57.38 952 920 -1586 351948 1586 -8/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 68.86 952 922 -2444 351947 2444 -8/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.38 952 920 -8632 352058 8632 -8/14 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 40.71 952 922 -9246 352078 9246 -8/14 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 130.14 952 920 -9996 352079 9996 -8114 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 354.47 ' i - 386361 9/4/2014 122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 DVDS 351949 COM -0319 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 100.00 386362 9/412014 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 112.00 OUTREACH PROGRAM 351950 INSECT STUDY 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 112.00 ' 386363 9/4/2014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 158.88 351873 0118026218 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 158.88 386364 9/4/2014 120433 COMCAST 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 351623 373622 -8/14 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.77 386365 9/412014 106495 CONTROLS & METERS INC. 462.69 METER HEAD 00001459 352060 22013 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL PUMPS' 462.69 386366 9/412014 101704 COOK, BARBARA 108.34 THEATER CAMP 2014 351951 14 -1652 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 500.00 THEATER CAMP 2014 351951 14 -1652 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 608.34 386367 9/4/2014 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 56.00 JULY 2014 WASHES - 351624 413687 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386367 9/4/2014 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY Continued... ' 386368 9/4/2014 129550 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 24,076.25 EDINA SPORTS DOME 351952 41476 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 336.64 EXPENSES 351953 41477 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 24,412.89 - 386369 914/2014 101951 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC 240.95 FREEZER REPAIR 351954 2970 -67186 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 240.95 386370 914/2014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 3,277.95 SEPT 2014 PREMIUM 351957 F018342 -9/14 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,277.95 386371 9/4/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 94.72 GRINDER, KNEE PADS 00005634 351774 930805 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.29 VALVE 00005639 351773 931882 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.01 386372 914/2014 121161 DEX MEDIA 21.40 PHONE LISTING 351775 390020154266 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.40 PHONE LISTING 351775 390020154266 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 21.40 PHONE LISTING 351775 390020154266 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 64.20 386373 9/4/2014 132870 DIVISION V SHEET METAL INC. 836.00 GOLF DOME FINAL 351847 APPL 5 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF'DOME BALANCE SHEET 2,262.50 GOLF DOME FINAL 351848 APPL 6 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 3,098.50 386374 9/4/2014 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. - 896.56 CAUSTIC SODA 351961 827001550 -14 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 896.56 386375 9/4/2014 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 676.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 351929 082614 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 676.00 386376 9/4/2014 124749 EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 100.00 K9 DECOY DEVELOPMENT 352032 DEREK TOLL 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF tDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386376 9/4/2014 124749 EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT Continued... - 100.00 386377 9/4/2014 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ' 25.00 MEETING - BILL NEUENDORF 351626 <34855 9232.6105 = DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 25.00 MEETING - SCOTT NEAL 351963 34870 1120.6104 CONFERENCES& SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 50.00 386378 9/4/2014 103694 EDINALARM INC. 214.09 ALARM REPAIR 351962 90731 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 214:09 386579. 9/4/2014 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. - I 301.00 PHOTO CONTESTAWARDS 351627 92564. 1130.6406 GENERAL_ SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 301.00 386380 9/412014 134777 EXCENSUS LLC . 850.00 DEMOGRAPHY DATA 351964 14EDINA01 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 650.00 386381 9/4/2014 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 41,524.42 JULY 2014 LODGING TAX 352033 CITY OF EDINA 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL'FUND REVENUES 41, 524.42 386382 914/2014 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 67.00 351875 W- 101518 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.00 386383 9/4/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 35.11 BATTERY 351777 1- ZO1989 1553.6530, REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 304.64 PADS, ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 352061 69- 149756 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.45 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 352062 69- 149782 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.82 BATTERIES 351776 69- 149797 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 205.59 WIRE KIT, DIST CAP, PLUGS 352063 69- 149895 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 830.61 386384 914/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 105.61 KEYS 00001648 -.; 351.965 0101334 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION - 105.61 386386 9/4/2014 134183 FERGUSON, LISA J R55CKR2 LOGIS101 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 350435 POND EXPANSION CITY OF EDINA ESCROW DEPOSITS STORM SEWER BALANCE SHEET 1.972.00 Council Check Register. by GL 386392 9/4/2014 134783 GALLERIA SHOPPING CENTER LLC Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 13,709.12 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 352034 REFUND 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 - ESCROW DEPOSITS ' "' Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386385 9/412014 123080 GARDENVIEW GREENHOUSE 134183 FERGUSON, LISA J Continued... 45.75 17.86 ART WORK SOLD 351825 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 45.75 17.86 386386 914/2014 133268 GORDON, KIM 133257 FILBIN, SUSAN 4.55 9.75 ARTWORK SOLD 351826 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD FART CENTER REVENUES 4.55 9.75 386387 9/4/2014 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 439.00 RENEWAL- BILL NEUENDORF 351778 0643896 -8/14 9232.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS _ 439.00 • 386388 9/4/2014 119211 FIRSTLAB 386.55 DRUG SCREENING 351628 00818229 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 230.00 PASS THROUGH FEES 351966 00819537 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 616.55 386389 9/4/2014 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 3,135:75 CAMERA REPAIR 00001619 351967 17811 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 43.25 PLUNGER 00001619 351968 17812 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,179.00 386390 .314/2014. 134770 FLICK, JACQUELINE, 100.00 ART CLASS REFUND 351779 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 100.00 386391 9/4/2014 100907 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES 9/2/2014' 10:24:59 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS ART CENTER REVENUES 1,972.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 350435 POND EXPANSION 5930.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS STORM SEWER BALANCE SHEET 1.972.00 386392 9/4/2014 134783 GALLERIA SHOPPING CENTER LLC 13,709.12 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 352034 REFUND 5930.2066 - ESCROW DEPOSITS ' "' STORM SEWER BALANCE SHEET 13,709.12 386393 9/4/2014 123080 GARDENVIEW GREENHOUSE 45.75 FLOWERS 00006242 351969 892201 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 45.75 386394 9/4/2014 133268 GORDON, KIM 4.55 ART WORK SOLD 351827 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD FART CENTER REVENUES 4.55 R55CKR2 L06IS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register bylnvoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386394 914/2014 133258 GORDON, KIM Continued... 386395 9/4/2014 134782 GORRA, COLLEEN 98.16 PERMIT REFUND 351970' ED132249 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS' 98.16 386396 9/4/2014 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 2,190.00 NEW SQUAD GRAPHICS 351629 95542 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 2,190.00 386397 9/4/2014 134771 GRAGERT, GIL 104.00 ART WORK SOLD 351828 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 104.00 386398 9/4/2014 101103 GRAINGER 31.50 DRAW BAR 00001404 351631 9519139647 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.52 GLUE TRAPS, ADHESIVE BANDAGES0005566 351781 9519403944 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION -GEN 258.12 HOSE CART, EAR MUFFS 00002251 351972 9519605597 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDIN80ROUGH OPERATIONS 47.10 SPOUT REPAIR KIT 00001673 351630 9520686214 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5.50 BATTERIES 00005567, 351782 9522539825 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 445.92 MARKING PAINT 00001611 351971 9522910513 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 699.60 NITRILE GLOVES 00001686 351780 9522910521 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 201.60 MARKING PAINT 00001616 352064 9524842789 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 1,719.86 386399 9/412014 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 9.10 ART WORK SOLD 351829 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ' 9.10 386400 9/4/2014 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 91.40 FOOTJOY SPIKES 351973 53005 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 146.29 PITCH FIX TOOLS 351974 53040 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 237.69 386401 9/4/2014 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 400.00 FORE & POUR 351916 0827 - 5401.4601 DRIVING RANGE GOLF REVENUES 3,075.00 JR DEVELOPMENT 2014 351975. 082714 5401.4593 GREEN •FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 3,475.00 - 386402 9/4/2014 134781 HANSEN CONSTRUCTION EDINA INC. ` ,. 2,500.00 ED124277 REFUND 351980 5140 KELSEY TER 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS• R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2,479.23 CITY OF EDINA 386406 Council Check Register by GL 126917 HAYES, SUSAN Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary ' 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 9/4/2014: — 9/412014 082514 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386402 914/2014 134781 - HANSEN CONSTRUCTION EDINA INC. - 386407 Continued... 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 2,500.00 386403 9/4/2014 201.12 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 351982 025315 ' COST OF GOODS SOLD 5.70 SEPT 2014 351978 6840817 -8 1550.6043 COBRAINSURANCE 351983 025316 4,715.89 SEPT 2014 351978 6840817 -8 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 402.24 4,721.59 386404 9/4/2014 126270 - HARTFORD - PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,766.44 LTD PREMIUM - SEPT 2014, 351979 6857580 -2 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 351984 1000048654 3,766.44 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 386406 9/4/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page - 14 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PAYROLL CLEARING PAYROLL CLEARING 2,479.23 CHEMICALS 00001246 351981 3635795 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT ART CENTER REVENUES GRILL GRILL LEGAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,479.23 386406 9/4/2014 126917 HAYES, SUSAN 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 351830 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 45.50 - 386407 9/4/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 201.12 BEEF PATTIES 351982 025315 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 201.12 BEEF PATTIES 351983 025316 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 402.24 386408 9/4/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 9,772.12 JULY 2014 ROOM & BOARD 351984 1000048654 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 9,772.12 386409 9/4/2014 134780 HIGHMARK BUILDERS 2,500.00 ED124304 REFUND 351985 5028 PARK TER 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 386410 914/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,503.00 351878 719598 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,349.00 351876 719948 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 555.00 351877 719949 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,407.00 386411 9/4/2014 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 450.53 POOL CHEMICALS 351986 140811025 5720.6545 CHEMICALS ART CENTER REVENUES GRILL GRILL LEGAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS l i " R55CKR2 LUUIS101 CITY Ot' _iNA 9 /2 /26 4 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register-by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386411 9/412014 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Continued... 450.53 386412 9/412014 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 5.14 ART WORK SOLD 351831 082514 5101.4413 ART WORKSOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.14 386413 9/4/2014 130873 HUSNIK, MATT " 68.55 UNIFORM PURCHASE 352065 082814 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.55 386414. 9/4/2014 134784 IDEA CREEK LLC, THE 435.00 PLAQUES 00003856 352035 59 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 435.00 386416 9/4/2014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 570.00 351879 22383 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 570.00 386416 9/4/2014 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIAL_ S ASSOCIATION LLC 78.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 351633 90 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC' ACTIVITIES 78.00 386417 9/4/2014 132871 INGLAS LLP 1,605.90 GOLF DOME FINAL 351849 BP2 -8B 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,605.90 386418 9/4/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 200.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 352080 JJ5513 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 386419 9/4/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 6,440.22 351711 2255040 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER _ VERNOWSELLING 3,964.57. 351881 2255081 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON'. SELLING 150.80 351880 2255082 - 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,630.15 352092 2255089 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 39.05 352093 2255090 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 16,224.79 386421 9/4/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 539.22 351716 1929314 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 1 912/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386421 9/4/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 964.41 351715 1929317 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,307.90 351714 1929321 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE 50TH'ST SELLING 7,504.85 351712 1930668 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 330.75 351748 1930947 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.16 351713 1930948 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.48 351717 1930990 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.32 352099 ,1934973 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .38 352095 1934976 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,754.73 352097 1934980 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,198.66 352102 1934981 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 192.46 352094 1934982 5842.5515 J COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,341.25 352098 1934983 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,826.89 352100. 1934984 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 455.80 352096 1934985 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 'YORK SELLING 2,636.67 352101 1934986 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR! YORK SELLING 2,705.65 351884 1934989 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,480.24 351885 1934990 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,154.45 351882 1934991 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 566.77 351886 1934992 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 66.82 351887 1934993 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,638.46 351883 1934994 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 'VERNON SELLING 732.72 351888 1934995 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 121.16- 351718 630452 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 22.47- 351890 630634 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.88- 351891 630635 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11.46- 351889 630736 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38,214.07 386422 9/4/2014 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 351832 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES. 7.80 386423 9/4/2014 124740 JULIUS B NELSON & SON INC. 763.50 GOLF DOME FINAL 351851 PAINTING 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 763.50 386424 9/4/2014 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 290.00 REMOVE DISEASED TREES 00001685 351634 4901 BROWNDALE 1644_.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS` TREES & MAINTENANCE 290.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF tDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No,. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386425 9/4/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. Continued... - 81.58 UNIFORMS 00003815 352036 253635 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 81.58 386426 9/412014 108679 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 351785- APPL #1BALANCE< 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1.000.00 386427 9/4/2014 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 389.50 GOLF DOME FINAL 351852 1306600007 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 389.50 386428 9/4/2014 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 3,590.32 RAMP DESIGN - PHASE II 351786 6022040 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT . 64,153.72 50TH /FRANCE CONSTRUCTION 351787 6035026 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 67,744.04 386429 9/4/2014. 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 313.20 AUG /SEPT 2014 SERVICE 351788 082814 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 313.20 386430 9/4/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 180.56 DWUTOW 11001223 351989 082714 2340.4761 OTHER REVENUE - GOVT FUND .180.56 386431 914/2014 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 196.00 REPAIR KITCHEN FAUCET 351635 1747 05537.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 196.00 386432 9/4/2014 124611 LARSCO INC. 541.62 VALVES 00001543 351990 3269 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 541.62 386433 9/4/2014 123096 LASER TECHNOLOGIES INC. 425.00 POLICE TICKET ENVELOPES 351636 163653 1400.6575 PRINTING 425.00 386434 9/412014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 89.27 LED LAMPS 351789 9302665115 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 12.45 WASHERS 00005565 351791 9302668944 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 496.26 FITTINGS, WASHERS, BITS 00005565 351790 9302669820 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page- 17 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING s SENIOR CITIZENS DWI FORFEITURE MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON WATER TREATMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386434 9/4/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 597.98 386435 9/4/2014 .101652 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 27,571.00 CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES 352037 201893 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 27,571.00 - 386436 9/4/2014 101652 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES - 30.00 MAYOR JAMES B. HOVLAND 352038 MEMBERSHIP 2014 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL 30.00 386437 9/4/2014 134772 LEE, LAURA 97:50 ART WORK SOLD 351833 082514 5101.4493 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 386438 9/4/2014 134776 LETCHER, JANE 57.92 POOL/TRACK PASS 351991 REFUND 5701.4532 SEASON TICKETS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 57.92 386439 9/4/2014 129966 LIGHTEN UP LLC 732.00 CONICAL FIXTURE 00001589 351792 02167 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 83.28 DIMMER SWITCHES 00001694 352066 02171 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 815.28 386440 9/4/2014 132762 LINCO FAB INC. 1,035.50 GOLF DOME FINAL 351855 APPL4 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,035.50 386441 9/4/2014 112094 LINDHOLM, ANGELA 21.98 BIRTHDAY CAKES 351992 082614 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 21.98 386442 9/4/2014 101465 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER - 2,700.00 PHASE II TRAINING 352039 082814 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,700.00 - 386443 9/4/2014 100868 LOGIS 99.00 GRANICUS EP WORK 351993 38846 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 594.00 2 FACTOR SQUAD WORK 351993 38846 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,485.00 IT CONSULTING 351993 38846 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 882.50 SHARED 911 SYSTEMS 351993 38846 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386443 9/4/2014 100858 LOGIS Continued... 3,060.50 386444 9/4/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 182,148.00 ELGIN SWEEPER 00005171- 351637 1140237 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 255.29- CREDIT 351794 9558 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 200.45- CREDIT 351795 9560 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.49- CREDIT 351793 9567 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 181,675.77 386445 9/4/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12,301.48 DIESEL FUEL 00005628 351796 841400 1553.6581 GASOLINE 12,301.48 386446 9/4/2014 134773 MARQUART, PETRA 2,500.00 9/11/14 LEADERSHIP MEETING 352006 PRESENTATION 1550.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 2,500.00 386447 9/4/2014 134786 MASTER NORTH AMERICA INC. 1,082.04 .. HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 352067 HALIFAX & 54TH 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 1,082.04 386448 9/4/2014 101292 MEDZIS, ANDREW 50.99 FORSETH LUNCHEON 352040 082614 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 50.99 386449 9/4/2014 106107 MIDWEST BLINDS 92.30 GOLF DOME FINAL 351856 BP2 -12A 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 92.30 386450 9/4/2014 101366 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 188.00 GOLF DOME FINAL 351857 BPI -32C 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 188.00 386451 9/412014 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 161.18 CHOWEN PARK POSTCARD MAILING 351997 73752 1120.6575 PRINTING 161.18 386452 9/4/2014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 21.38 WINDOW WASHING 351800 928027576 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 21.38 i 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page - 19 STREET EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA '9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger . Account Description Business Unit 386452 9/4/2014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. Continued... 386453 914/2014 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,149.00 CONNECTION FEE 351998 082214 5915.6136 PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,149.00 386454 914/2014 117837 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 375.00 OPERATOR EQUIPMENT EXPO (3) 352001 SEPT 15 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 375.00 386455 914/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 35.56 TOGGLE SWITCHES 00005602 351797 0106320 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,394.75 STEEL /REPAIRS - LIGHTPOLE BASES30005530 351798 0106321 -IN 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 29.00 TRIGGERJETS 00005569 352069 0106368 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT- OPERATION GEN 75.00 PUMP 00005604 352068 0106369 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,534.31 386456 9/4/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 131.00 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTCARDS 351639 16059 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 49.00 DEVELOPMENTAL ICE POSTERS 351638 16076 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 49.00 BACK TO SCHOOL POSTERS 351638 16076 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 131.00 RAISE GLASSES POSTCARDS 351638 16076 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 360.00 386457 9/4/2014 102487 MN /SCIA 195.00 REGISTRATION - MIKE LUTZ 352000 FALL CONFERENCE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 195.00 386458 914/2014 117420 MOE, MARK 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 351834 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART'CENTER REVENUES 16.25 386469 9/4/2014 134778. MOESLE; SCOTT 906.64 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 351999 082614 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE'DEPT. GENERAL 906.64 386460 9/4/2014 132966 MONTGOMERY, MARY 182.92 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 325939 5309 56TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 182.92 386461 9/4/2014 129086 MONTGOMERY, MEREDITH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386461 914/2014 129086 MONTGOMERY, MEREDITH Continued... 14.14 ARTWORK SOLD " 351835 - 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.14 386462 9/4/2014 102395 MDSE, WILLIAM 416.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 351930 082614 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 416.00 386463 9/4/2014 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC`COMPANY 760.00 GOLF DOME FINAL 351858 APPL 9 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 760.00 386464 9/4/2014 121125 NEMER, KAREN 21.29 ART WORK SOLD 351836 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.29 386465 9/4/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 758.50 351894 93024 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 354.00 351893 93025 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,112.50 386466 9/4/2014 104350 NIKE USA INC. 34.55 SHIRT 352002 962275203 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 34.55 386467 9/412014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 199.72 ARTICULATING ARM 00005593 351801 36858 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.72 386468 9/4/2014 106023 NORTHLAND PAVING 16,069.25 GOLF DOME FINAL 351859 APPL 4 . 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS - GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET ' 2,739.09 GOLF DOME FINAL 351860 APPL 5 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 3,892.91 GOLF DOME FINAL 351861 APPL 6 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET. 22,701.25 386469 9/4/2014 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 31,96 NAMEPLATES 00002097 351641 722197546001 5760.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMINEXPENSE " 31.96 386470 9/412014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 146.10 HOIST REPAIR 00005624 351802 544595 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386470 91412014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES Continued... 805.00 OSHA HOIST INSPECTIONS 00005625 351803 544600 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN- 951.10 386471 9/4/2014 123786 OLSEN, VICKI - 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 351837 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 386472 914/2014 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 6,221.05 WATER SAMPLING 00001620 352004 12140922 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 6.221.05 386473 .914/2014 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 21.13 ART WORK SOLD 351838 082514 5101.4413 ART -WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.13 386474 9/4/2014 162440 PASS, GRACE 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 351839 082514 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 386475 9/4/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,243.93 351722 8461807 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 801.25 351896 8462378 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,602.50 351720 8462380 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 955.80 351895 8462796 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 638.75 351721 8462804 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 222.25 351719 8462837 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,464.48 386476 9/4/2014 121040 PC ADVENTURES INC. 436.24 SECURITY CAMERA WORK 352041 9800 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 436.24 386477 9/4/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 326.50 351897 01285862 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 378.28 351604 42672068 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 305.78 352005 42672072 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,010.56 386478 9/4/2014 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 75.00 NEIGHBORHOOD POSTCARD DESIGN 351642 081914 -3 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF tDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386478 9/412014 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. Continued... 400.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER TEMPLATE 351643 081914 -4 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 475.00 386479 9/4/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 8.00- ADJUSTMENT 351904 2651496 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 341.74 351724 2654956 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 198.29 351723 2654960 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5bTH ST SELLING 1.16 351900 2658485 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.32 352105 2658489 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 85.80 352106 2658490 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.64 351898 2658491 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,951.94 352103 2658493 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 65.16 352108 2658494 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,000.00 352104 2658495 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,713.34 352107 2658496 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 959.17 351901 2658497 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.16 351899 2658498 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 150.82 351902 2658499 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,227.63 351903 2658500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 386480 9/4/2014 100119 PING 125.62 GOLF CLUB 352007 12436194 5440.5511 125.62 386481 9/4/2014 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING - USE 124176 321.50 352109 22077 5862.5515 386482 9/4/2014 134007 PJ TAILORS & CLEANERS 25.00 LAUNDER TABLE COVER 352003 3775 1400.6201 25.00 386483 9/4/2014 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 670.00 PARTS FOR PLAYGROUND 351644 1400184288 1646.6103 670.00 386484 91412014 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 2,643.72 VEHICLE REPAIRS 351806 22411 1553.6180 2,643.72 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by 131_: Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice B Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386484 9/4/2014 `' 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES Continued... 386485 9/412014 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 110.32 GAS PUMP REPAIRS 351807 318187 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.32 386486 9/412014 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 1,014.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 351931 082614 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES -1,014.00 386487 91412014 125321 REACH WITH ME 1,274.00 KID N' PLAY PROGRAM 352011 21118 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL — 1,274.00 386488 9/4/2014 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 345.00 POOL VAC HOSE 352012 275905 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 345.00 386489 9/4/2014 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,920.00 FERTILIZER 00001682 351808 3028076 -00 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 2,920.00 386490 '9/4/2014 118668 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 220.00 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 351809 70795 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.00 - 386491 9/4/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. _ 179.84 SOFTENER SALT 351646 00303565 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 179.84 386492 .9/4/2014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 28.35 FOOD 351648 008126 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD' VANVALKENBURG 81.03 FOOD 351647 008605 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 109.38 386493 9/4/2014 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 16.90 _ART WORK SOLD 351840 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.90 386494 9/4/2014 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 273.95 AIR FRESHENERS 00001653 351649 129111 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY,HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF tDINA i 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/4/2014 — 9/412014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 386494 9/4/2014 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. Continued... 68.56 FILTERS 00001652 352042 129112 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 168.90 FURNACE FILTERS 00001654 351650 129113 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 511.41 . 386495 9/4/2014 133695 SCHERMER, SUZETTE 78.00 ART CLASS REFUND 351810 REFUND, 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 386496 9/4/2014 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT i 260.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 351932 082614 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 260.00 386497 9/4/2014 127490 SCULLY,'PAT 43.55 ART WORK SOLD 351841 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 43.55 386498 9/4/2014 100995 SEH 1,483.46 RICHMOND HILLS RD IMPROV 351655 285114 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 3,607.70 NORMANDALE ST RECON 351653 285205 01394.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE 2,966.24 BID DOCS'AND CPS 351652 285206 01416.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 54TH ST BRIDGEBSTREEl REPAIR 35,447.61, ARDEN PK PRELIM DESIGN 351811 285208 01412.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON - 780.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES 351654 285396 08060.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 836.96 ANTENNA PROJECTS 351651 285430 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 45,122.67 386499 9/4/2014 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 517.50 AUG 2014 FEES 352013 008816 -8/14 '1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 517.50 386500 9/4/2014 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 FLOOR CLEANING 351656 48638 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,650.00 . 386501 9/4/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 109.85 ART WORK SOLD 351842 082514 5101.4413 — ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 109.85 386502 9/4/2014 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 18.82 ART WORK SOLD 351843 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 18.82 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary . 9/412014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386502 9/4/2014 127519 SIEGEL, LISA Continued... 386503 9/4/2014 - 120784 SIGN PRO 82.00 SIGNAGE 351657 8093 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . ADMINISTRATION J 82.00 386504 9/4/2014 132135 SMASHBURGER 1,865.94., DEPOSIT REFUND 347694 .071514 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,865.94 - 386606 9/4/2014 103460 SNAP -ON TOOLS 949.01 COMPUTER UPDATE 352070 08271411910 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 949.01 386506 9/4/2014 133343 SONUS INTERIORS INC. 147,50 GOLF DOME FINAL 351867 372715 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE.SHEET 147.50 386507 9/4/2014 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 572.42 METAL RAILS FOR BEER COOLER 352081 49469 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 572.42 METAL RAILS FOR BEER COOLER 352081 49469 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING' 572.43 METAL RAILS FOR BEER COOLER 352081 49469 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,717.27 386608 9/4/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3,913.40 351727 1194244 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, 50TH ST SELLING 2,309.41 351907 1196684 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 218.25 351905 1196686 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,075.15 351906 1196687 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,455.08 351725 1196689 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' VERNON SELLING 9,542.15 351726 1196690 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE' VERNON SELLING 2,611.77 351908 5006846 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR: YORK SELLING ` 24,125.21 386509 9/412014 110977 SOW, ADAMA - . 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 351844 082514 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 386510 9/4/2014 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 2,180.00 RECODE LOCKS ON SQUADS 351658 141531 - 141538 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,180.00 R55CKR2 LUGIS101 CONTROLLER KIT, LIGHT BAR 00002627 351662 1463505 CITY OF e01NA EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT' PACS IS 2,152.89 Council Check Register by GL 386519 914/2014. 104932 TAYLOR MADE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary: 1,178.61 GOLF BALLS 352016 30052760 5440.5511 -,9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014: PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO, # 'Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386510 9/4/2014 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 386520 9/4/2014 Continued... 386511 .9/4/2014 103283. ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 326.00 MORTAR 00001662 ' 352018 0000667216. 5932.6520 3,180.00 'TRASH CAN LIDS 00001095_ 351660 -' 18198 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,180.00 386512 9/4/2014 108680 ST. PAUL UTILITIES INC. 3,463.55 GOLF DOME FINAL 351863 APPL 5 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 3,463.55 386613 914/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 286.00 SUBSCRIPTION 352014 1808753 -8/14 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 286.00 386514 9/4/2014, 129409 STEEN, BARB 203.45 ART WORK SOLD 351845 082514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 203.45 386515 9/412014 101015 STREICHERS 44.99 HOLSTER 00003078 351661 11108092 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 44.99 386516 9/4/2014 113664 SWANSON & YOUNGDALE INC. 1,012.50 GOLF DOME FINAL 351864 BP1 -9A 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,012.50 386617 9/4/2014 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE CLEANING _ 352015 :383165 5421.6102 CO_ NTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 386518 91412014 106673 TAPCO i 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page - 27 Business Unit LITTER REMOVAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET '. i EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GRILL 2,152.89 CONTROLLER KIT, LIGHT BAR 00002627 351662 1463505 2501.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT' PACS IS 2,152.89 386519 914/2014. 104932 TAYLOR MADE 1,178.61 GOLF BALLS 352016 30052760 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 277.47 GOLF BALLS 352017 30068387 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,456.08 386520 9/4/2014 120325 TCC MATERIALS 326.00 MORTAR 00001662 ' 352018 0000667216. 5932.6520 ;CONCRETE. GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 268.00 CITY OF EDINA 00772168 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL Council Check Register by GL 351728 842850 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5,113.35 351909 844292 5862.5514 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386520 9/4/2014 -. 386524 120325 TCC MATERIALS 101474 TITLEIST Continued... 326.00 229.68 386521 9/412014 0051348 121253 THAYER, LARRY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 476.01 128.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352072 082914 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 128.80 276.39 HATS 352021 0056062 386522 9/4/2014 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 982.08 475,280.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 352043 OB2214 01404.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS i 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 475,280.89 386623 9/412014 67.67 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 352074 1004004,2 1553.6585 9/2/2014, 10:24:59 Page - 28 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 268.00 352019 00772168 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,954.43 351728 842850 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,113.35 351909 844292 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,355.78 386524 9/4/2014 101474 TITLEIST 229.68 GOLF CLUBS 352023 0051348 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 476.01 GOLF BALLS 352022 0054500 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 276.39 HATS 352021 0056062 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 982.08 386626 9/4/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 67.67 WHEEL BRUSHES 00005531 352074 1004004,2 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 352.18 WELDING GAS TIPS 00005632 351812 10040316 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 419.85 386526 9/4/2014, 103218 TRI -STATE BOBCAT 148.50 AUGER BIT, EXTENSION 00001703 352075 R21900 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 148.50 1 386527 9/4/2014 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 530.00 GOLF DOME FINAL 351865 421338 5200.1705 CONSTR.-IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 530.00 386528 9/4/2014 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 19.25 TOOLS 00001677 351814, 667240 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.25 386629 9/4/2014 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. R55CKR2 LUGIS101 CITY Ot- -AA j I 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary j 9/4/2014 — 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386529 9/4/2014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Continued... 282.00 TURF MIXTURE 00001675 352024.'33256 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 282.00 386530 914/2014 129105 TWIN SOURCE 228.71 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 352076 00440330 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 228.71 386531 9/4/2014 103973 ULINE 33.68 FREIGHT ON INV 60750059 351815 60750059 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT, GENERAL 33.68 386532 914/2014 134785 UPROOTER 494.88 WOODY PLANT REMOVER 00001590 352077 12019 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES 8 MAINTENANCE 494.88 _ - 386533 9/4/2014 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 24.97 SHIPPING CHARGE 00001617 352025 TRAN:0667 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 24.97 386534 9/4/2014 100050 USPS -- 8,000.00 ACCT. NO. 03620836 351663 082614 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,000.00 - - 386535 914/2014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 120.69 PLATES, LINERS, TOWELS, 351817 318305 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING e 664.49 LIQUOR BAGS 351817 318305 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING- 75.63 TOWELS, UTENSILS, CLEANER 351816 320920 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON_SELLING - 557.58 LIQUOR BAGS 351816 320920 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,418.39 386536 9/4/2014 131737 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,220.53 HAZARDOUS WASTE.PICKUP 352026 419498450 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION 8 OVERHEAD 406.85 HAZARDOUS WASTE PICKUP 352026 419498450 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,627.38 386637 9/4/2014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,700.00 CART RENTAL 00006322 352027 819140008 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS ' 1,700.00 i 386638 9/4/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/212014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit • 386538 914/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY Continued... 267.12 LIGHTING 00001668 351664 8562369 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 267.12 386539 9/4/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 609.66 LIGHTING 351818 15249454 -01 4090.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 32.88 BALLASTS 00001679 351665 15251073 -00 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 642.54 386540..9/4/2014 105287 WEMYSS, SCOTT D. - 251.00 PAR TAGS 00003857 352028 106 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES l FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 251.00 ,- 386541 9/4/2014 134779 WEXLER, CLIFFORD 24.34 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 352029 082614 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ` 24.34 386542 9/4/2014 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 370.35 GOLF, DOME FINAL 351866 APPL 5 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 370.35 386543 9/412014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 751.80 351730 515979 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 50TH ST SELLING _ 149.62 351914 515980 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 181.16 352114 516933 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE -. YORK SELLING 1,915.97 352113 516934 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,562.20 351913 516935 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD:WINE VERNON SELLING 5,560.75 386545 9/412014. 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,226.97 351738 1080217835 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 805.17 351735 1080219081 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 106.53 351731 1080220629 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 73.15 351734 1080220630 5862.5515 Cost OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,786.40 351733 1080220631 5862.5513 COST OF GOODSS OLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,934.51 351732 1080220632 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR' VERNON SELLING 2,462.47 351736 1080220709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 219.45 351737 1080220710 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,587.40 351915 1080220711 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 264.12 351916 1080220713 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20.00- 351922 2080053415 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 1_66IS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No: Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386545 9/4/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 128.00- 351739 2080053424 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.00- 351920 2080053440 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 11.00- 351926 2080053444 - 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 18.00- 351919 2080053445 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 100.00 - 351925 2080053454 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR • ` :. 50TH ST SELLING 412.00- 351918 2080053457 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 17.08- 351924 2080053468 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 34.16- 351917 2080053470 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 358.92- 351921 2080053485 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 115.07- 351923 2080053509 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR _ 50TH ST SELLING 16,245.94 386546 9/4/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 153.60 352030 1090276982 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 8,048.90 351740` 1090277157 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,993.50 351744 1090277159 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 104.40 351743 1090277160 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,202.75 351741 1090277691 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER' VERNON SELLING 246.00 351742 1090277692 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,864.45 351745 1090278467 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 295.20 351747 1090278468 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 351746 .1090278469 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,634.08 35211.5 1090281035 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - VERNON SELLING 45.60 352116 1090281037 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING_ 1,344.00 352117 1090281151 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 354.00 352119 1090281152 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 110.00 352118 1090281153 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20,417.98 386547 9/4/2014 -,_118396 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 46.99 HELMET SHIELD 00003854 352044 E1239751 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.99 386548 9/4/2014 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 7,448.00 PLANNING-STAFF ASSISTANCE 351819 1- 01686 -580 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 7,448.00 386650 914/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,287.63 51- 6227619 -3 351756 423370139 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 36.67 51- 0194596.8 351676 424488854 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount 386560 9/4/2014 29.56 27.45 51.87 14.50 14.50 40.57 83.09 115.56 23.38 14.97 1,795.84 2,672.73 10,927.14 1,830.31 33.65 7,426.91 22.71 168:28 641.66 40.00 177.70 14.65 30,556.04 60,047.37 Supplier/ Explanation 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 0160483 -1 51- 0223133 -2 51- 4420190 -3 51- 6050184 -2 51- 6541084 -2 51- 8997917 -7 51- 9770164 -7 . 51- 0010166207 -2 51- 0010118404 -0 51- 0193479-4 51- 5107681-4 51- 5547446 -1 51- 6644819 -9 51- 9011854 -4 51- 8976004 -9 51- 9603061 -0 51- 9770163 -6 51- 9608462 -5 51- 0010060454 -7 51- 0010103585 -7 51- 8987646 -8 51- 0010504853 -2 51- 4621797 -2 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT 8 POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 1,615;772.56 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,565,777.31 A/P ACH Payment 49,995.25 Total Payments 1,615,772.56 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page- 32 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL AQUATIC WEEDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING. ORNAMENTAL STORM LIFT STATION MAINT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING REGULAR SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 351675 424489110 1330.6185 351677 424489505 1322.6185 351678 424543030 1551.6185 351682 424570477 4086.6103 351670 424576669 1646.6185 351673 424605104 1321.6185 351674 424612565 1321.6185 351672 424617768 1646.6185 351671 424618237 1322.6185 351681 424636000 5934.6185 351758 424711065 5111.6185 351757 424728310 1628.6185 351761 424736468 5720.6185 351679 424768519 5913.6185 351666 424769009 1321.6185 351759 424777493 1552.6185 351668 424779103 1321.6185 351680 424784044 5921.6185 351760 424784946 5210.6185 351669 424796469 5210.6185 351667 424803207 1321.6185 351683 424805666 1321.6185 352045 424908175 1321.6185 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT 8 POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 1,615;772.56 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,565,777.31 A/P ACH Payment 49,995.25 Total Payments 1,615,772.56 9/2/2014 10:24:59 Page- 32 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CITY HALL GENERAL AQUATIC WEEDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING. ORNAMENTAL STORM LIFT STATION MAINT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING REGULAR SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 9/2/2014 10:25:10 Council Check Summary Page- 9/4/2014 - 9/4/2014 Company 01000 GENERAL FUND 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND' 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 09900 PAYROLL FUND Report Totals Amount 415,759.70 1,193.20 2,152.89 606,659.91 184,338.00 3,036.08 92,800.87 1,290.49 12,266.12 713.07 25,412.89 13, 518.71 4,405.87 175,632.91 48,044.40 16,314.00 9.17 AAA nn 1,615,772.56 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requlremenfs =of the -City of Edina purchasing_pol.i i s nd proced ate Finan or e _ � A R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 15.00- 352328 44037400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 132.00 Council Check Register by GL 5842.5512 COST, OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.55 352148 44606800 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary YORK SELLING 404.40 352147 44606900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 352145 44607000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 228 9/1112014 352222 44611100 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 759.65 352491 44699000 5842.5512 218.75 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 352287 21408193 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 218.75 352487 44699300' 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 229 9/11/2014 5862.5513 , 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY VERNON SELLING 581.05 352488 44699500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 132.80 113.35 352139 1823085 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 321.51 87.60 5862.5515 352141 1823086 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 352149 90758400 5842.5515 72.80 YORK SELLING 352138 1823485 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 106.20 352495 90758600 352140 1823489 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 45.65 352493 90786900 43.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 352481 1825000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 69.60 352483 1825001 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 35.15 352482 1825002 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 547.35 230 9/11/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 123.34 BREW MAKER FILTER 352164 1144081 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.34 231 9/11/2014 100638 BACHMAN'S 753.35 TREES 00006230 352166 ,533. 971 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 753.35 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 1 Business Unit PARKING RAMP VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 232 9111/2014 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 15.00- 352328 44037400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 132.00 352146 44519400 5842.5512 COST, OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.55 352148 44606800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 404.40 352147 44606900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 599.75 352145 44607000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . YORK'SELLING 340.65 352327 44607300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 131.55 352222 44611100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 759.65 352491 44699000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 190.33 352492 44699100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 129.67 352487 44699300' 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 145.55 352490 44699400 5862.5513 , COST OF GOODS SOLD 1MNE VERNON SELLING 581.05 352488 44699500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 113.35 352143 6475200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 321.51 352489 6478200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 171.22 352149 90758400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 65.09 352144 90758500 . 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92.55 352495 90758600 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 45.65 352493 90786900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 2 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ELECTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL HUMAN RESOURCES ELECTION HUMAN RESOURCES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET PARKING RAMP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL - Council Check Register by Invoice &,Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 232 9/11/2014 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION Continued... 86.79 352494 90787000 5822.5515 COST'OF GOODS SOLD MIX 4,332.31 233 9/11/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 157.49- RETURN 352556 CP -WO- 946988 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121.89. METAL BOOKCASE 00003068 - 352557 OE- 362073 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 67.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 352288 WO- 946635 -1 1180.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 875.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003068 352555 WO- 946988 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 352168 WO- 955700 -1 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 100.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 352168 WO- 955700 -1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 209.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 352169 WO- 956156 -1 1180.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 15.74 CALCULATOR 352170 WO- 956505 -1 1170.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 110.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003061 352386 WO- 956755 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1.360.36 234 9/11/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 54.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 352290 100421 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 92.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003861 352387 100627 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146.70 236 9/11/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 9,353.00 DESIGN SERVICES 352291 0169223 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,353.00 ' 236 9/1112014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 59.50 FILTER ASSEMBLIES 00005334 352292 862167 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 19.48 HOSE 00005484 352171 868344X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 34.46 BELT DRIVE 00005532 352293 883365X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 63.90 COOLANT 00005538 352294 884872 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 69.66 PIPE ASSEMBLY 00005606 352172 886454 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS ' 247.00 237 9/11/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 9,351.25 SOIL/CONCRETE OBSERVATIONS 352295 B006941 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 9,351.25 238 9/11/2014 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 258.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 352560 7070205693 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 258.00 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 2 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ELECTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL HUMAN RESOURCES ELECTION HUMAN RESOURCES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET PARKING RAMP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary `. 9/11/2014 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description i Business Unit 239 9/11/2014 520354 104020 DALCO 232.16 Continued... 242 9/11/2014 88.50 DISINFECTANT CLEANER 00001684 352296--2785227 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE AUG 2014 BILLINGS 352398 366.76 FLOOR CLEANER, TOWELS, WIPES 00001454 352297 2785336 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 243 9111/2014 455.26 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 121.00 CONDENSER REPAIR 240 9/11/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 121.00 244 9/11/2014 1,331.30 352331 767691 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 352416 128319 4,006.10 352227 767692 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9/11/2014 80.00 352228 767693 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 352427 93246 615.40 352500 768074 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9/11/2014 6,032.80 244.49 TANK, FITTINGS 00001692 241 9/11/2014 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 244.49 247 9/11/2014 49.51 BAKERY 352181 520235 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5842.6512 5902.6103 5915.6406 1553.6584 1553.6584 PAPER SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES GRILL GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS YORK SELLING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE WATER TREATMENT LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 108.47 352392 520353 74.18 352393 520354 232.16 242 9/11/2014 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,863.50 AUG 2014 BILLINGS 352398 1592 6,863.50 243 9111/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 121.00 CONDENSER REPAIR 352408 45599 121.00 244 9/11/2014 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 213.22 THERMAL ROLLS 00007515 352416 128319 213.22 245 9/11/2014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 605.00 MAIL LATE NOTICES 352427 93246 605.00 246 9/11/2014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 244.49 TANK, FITTINGS 00001692 352428 865904 244.49 247 9/11/2014 101792 LUBE -TECH 50.00- CREDIT 352433 502688 5,174.60 OIL 352432 504739 5421.5510 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5842.6512 5902.6103 5915.6406 1553.6584 1553.6584 PAPER SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES GRILL GRILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS YORK SELLING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE WATER TREATMENT LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 247 9/11/2014 101792 LOBE -TECH Continued... 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 4 Business Unit 5,124.60 .248. 9/11/2014 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 779.86 352154 180518 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,301.41 352247 180727 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 39.60 352155 180739 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 2,120.87 249 9111/2014 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 450.00 PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT 352436 9320 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.00 260 9/11/2014 103944 MED COMPASS - 1,630.00 HEARING TESTS 352192 23985 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,630.00 251 9/11/2014 101483 MENARDS 149.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES, CART 00008001 352438 65244 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 15.97 POST MOUNT 00001709 352439 65917 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 165.18 252 9/11/2014 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 560.29 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 01396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BRAEMAR HILLS C 709.25 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 08059.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -59 BRAEMAR HILLS B 1,096.60 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 01397.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAKE EDINAA 15,656.21 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 01395.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BRAEMAR HILLS B 745.94 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 03475.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BRAEMAR HILLS B RECON 1,406.90 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 05531.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BRAEMAR HILLS B RECON 2,129.94 FINAL PAYMENT 352581 091214 04391.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BRAEMAR HILLS B RECON 22,305.13 263 - 9/11/2014 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 20,595.30 PLAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 352598 2481 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET' 15,069.07 PLAY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 352597 2482 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOR000H BALANCE SHEET - _ 35,664.37 254 9/11/2014 129486 PAPCO INC. 429.10 AIR PURIFIER 352196 87715 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 429.10 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 352263 0105616 -IN 5822.5515 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 114.50 352360 0105617 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by GL 180.25 352264 0105618 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 186.00 352265 0105621 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 255 9/11/2014 352267 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Continued... 352362 370825 -00 842.40 TIRES 00005559 352454 210132619 "' 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1,322.54 TIRES 00005559 352453 210132645 1553:6583• TIRES & TUBES 696.22 TIRES 00005559 352455 210132651 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 2,861.16 256 9/11/2014 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 565.68 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 352456 0055230 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 565.68 257 9/11/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 157.50 BUSINESS CARDS 352197 82720 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 157.50 258 9/11/2014 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 110.56 PERMIT REFUND 352586 ED132431 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS 110.56 259 9/11/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 76.47 SEAL, STUDS, BOLTS 00005541 352315 19759 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,721.94 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005642 352463 656257 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,798.41 260 9/11/2014 102926 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 2,305.29 LIQUID FERTILIZER 352128 7730 -R 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 2,305.29 261 9/11/2014 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1,880.66 MOWER PARTS 00001696 352473 E183807 1641.6556 TOOLS 1,880.66 262 9/11/2014 119454 VINOCOPIA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ICE MAINT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MOWING 2.50 352263 0105616 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 114.50 352360 0105617 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 180.25 352264 0105618 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 186.00 352265 0105621 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 483.25 263 9/11/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 380.40 352267 370336 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 488.25 352362 370825 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1,734.39 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 386552 9/11/2014 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL INC. Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 2,753.75 JANITORIAL SERVICES Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 1551.6103 2,753.75 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 386553 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 263 9/11/2014 129.00 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 352163 2830744 Continued... 2,691.60 352268 370826 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9/11/2014 659.55 123708 ADVANCED IRRIGATION INC. 352363 370835 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,219.80 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00001626 352382. 3156071514 5913.6180 386551 9/11/2014 383.10 100613 AAA 386555 9/11/2014 1,734.39 LICENSE PLATE 352381 090214 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD SAFETY EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY HALL GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,734.39 386552 9/11/2014 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL INC. 2,753.75 JANITORIAL SERVICES 352553 7076569 1551.6103 2,753.75 386553 9/11/2014 129458 ACME TOOLS 129.00 DRILL DRIVER 00001695 352163 2830744 1322.6530 129.00 386554 9/11/2014 123708 ADVANCED IRRIGATION INC. 383.10 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00001626 352382. 3156071514 5913.6180 383.10 386555 9/11/2014 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 688.02 FOOD 352383 408290601 5421.5510 688.02 '386556 9/1112014 133800 ARMAG CORPORATION 497.00 BANG BOX 00003073 352554 6363 1400.6610 497.00 386557 9/11/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 7.84- 352142 20133 5842.5514 7.84- 352486 20541 5842.5514 590.00 352220 62873 5822.5514 430.00 352221 63779 5822.5514 732.00 352484 64111 5862.5514 778.00 352326 64351 5842.5514 44.75 352485 64353 5842.5514 2,559.07 386558 9/11/2014 100256 AT&T MOBILITY 25.75 K91 DATA CARD 352384 287257682821X82 1400.6160 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD SAFETY EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY HALL GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386558 9/11/2014 100256 AT &T MOBILITY Continued... 514 25.75 386559 9/11/2014 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC. 134.95 ALTERNATOR REBUILD 00005607 352165 15770 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.95 386560 9/11/2014 134796 BEAUPRE, GREGORY 104.79 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 352167 5717 MELODY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 104.79 386661 9/11/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 40.00 352496 160194 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 310.95 352497 165612 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 350.95 386562 .9/1112014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY - 122.00 COFFEE 352385 1193193 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 122.00 386563 9/11/2014 126268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 SEPT COMPACTOR RENTAL 352289 090214 -3 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 386564 9/11/2014 119351 BOURGETIMPORTS 249.00 352498 121890 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 249.00 386565 i 9/1112014 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC. 13,945.00 ITERIS VIDEO SYSTEM 00001410 352379 045282 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 13,945.00 386566 9/11/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 798.15 352223 394986 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,008.00 352224 399682 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 430.00 352329 399736 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,722.31 352225 399737 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 37.10 352330 404161 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING i 41.85 352226 404162 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386566 9/11/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 392.82 352499 405193 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,430.23 386567 9/11/2014 111089 CARLSON, ERIC 441.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 352558 090814 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 441.94 386568 9111/2014 134803 CARUFEL, ALTON J 8.06 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 352559 4324 42ND ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8.06 386569 9111/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 232.85 5584304 -9 352215 5584304 -8/14 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.49 5584310 -6 352173 5584310 -8/14 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 29.61 5590919 -6 352174 5590919 -8/14 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 277.95 386570 9/11/2014 123898 . CENTURYLINK 123.68 9U'831-0024 352176 0024 -8/14 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 55.85 952 929 -0297 352175 0297 -8/14 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 373.22 952 927 -8861 352177 8861 -8/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 552.75 386671 9/11/2014 127227 CFA SOFTWARE INC. 795.00 CFATRAINING 00003859 352388 12598 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 795.00 386572 9/11/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 1,453.38 LAB SERVICES 352389 090314 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 1,453.38 386573 9/11/2014 120433 COMCAST 9.03 8772 10 614 0161120 352391 161120 -8/14 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -ARENAADMINISTRATION 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 352390 177449 -8/14 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 100.44 386674 9/1112014 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 224.65 114 - 10014090 -3 352561 083114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 224.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier'! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386575 9/11/2014 134804 CYPRESS LTD Continued... 27,500.00, REAL ICE WATER TREATMENT SYS 00008000 352562 9592458 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27,500.00 386576 9/11/2014 102456 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 191.00 FLOOR MATS 00005631 352178 4- 149640 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 191.00 386577 9111/2014 134792 DECISION WISE INC. i 7,250.00 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT /SURVEY 352179 14600 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 69.37 FEDERAL EXPRESS RESULTS 352180 '14721 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7.319.37 386678 9111/2014 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 250.00 AERATION SYSTEM PERMITS 352563 PERMITS 5937.6103• PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00 AERATION SYSTEM PERMITS 352563 PERMITS 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 386579 9/11/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 556.75 110311893 352394 110311893 -8/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 556.75 i 386680 j 9/11/2014 123995 DICK'S /L, AKEVILLE SANITATION INC. . 3,751.44 REFUSE 352565 DT0000882223 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,797.54 REFUSE 352566 DT0000882224 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,161.86 REFUSE 352564 DT0000S99369 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,710.84 386681 9/11/2014 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 52.50 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION 352182 1961487 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52.50 386682 9/11/2014 103594 EDINALARM INC. 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 9 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE, SHARED SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 166.25 REPAIR DOOR ACCESS PANEL 352395 90742 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 166.25 386683 9/11/2014 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 157.85 AUG MANAGEMENT FEE 352298 AUG2014 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 157.85 386584 9/11/2014 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc,No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386584 9/11/2014 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE Continued... 7,654.16 E -81 REPAIRS 351028 74817 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7,654.16 386586 9/11/2014 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,275.52 LIGHT BARS _ 00003062 352299 AW071414 -4 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,275.52 386586 9/11/2014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 124.70 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003706 352397 1669833 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 375.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003705 352396 1670012 1470,6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 500.20 386587 9/11/2014 120361 ETC INSTITUTE 14,107.50 PARK MASTER PLAN SURVEY 352124 16392 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,107.50 386588 9/1112014 134793 FAAC INCORPORATED - 42,440.00 FIREARMS SIMULATION 352183 8498 7412.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 42,440.00' 386589 9/1112014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 137.02 BATTERY 352302 1- Z01388 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 146.07 BATTERY 352301 1- Z01565 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5.97 OIL FILTERS 352303 69- 141874 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 304.64 PADS, ROTORS 352300 69- 149904 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 593.70 386590 9/11/2014 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 2.41 PHOTO REPRINTS 352184 T2- 338555 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 8326063 2.41 386591 9/11/2014 100756 FEDEX 18.06 SHIPPING CHARGES 352399 2- 759 -77165 1400.6235 POSTAGE 34.77 SHIPPING CHARGES 352185 2- 762 -54054 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52.83 386692 9/11/2014 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 235.05 REPAIR PARTS 00001631 352400 17847 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 235.05 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 10 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DRUG FORFEITURE FIRE DEPT, GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL PSTF RANGE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 788.98 CITY OF EDINA 386696 9/11/2014 122414 FORKLIFTS. MINNESOTA INC. - Council Check Register by GL ' 221.45 ANNUAL INSPECTION 352406 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 221.45 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 352405 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - 386592 9/11/2014 01S3910230 101612 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES Continued... 386593 9/11/2014 121386 FLINT. HILLS RESOURCES LP '386597 15,056.76 CRS -2P 352407 16177077 -0 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 15,056.76 15.00 386594 9/11/2014 1006258207 102016 FLOWERS OF EDINA LAUNDRY 15.00 60.95 JULY 4TH FLOWERS 352125 3909 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 386598 60.95 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 386596 9/11/2014 101476 FOOTJOY 27.89 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 11 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION COMMUNICATIONS 681.97 JACKETS 352401 5796781 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 43.99 SHORTS 352403 5797226 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 63.02 SHOES 352402 5798897 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING GENERALSTORM SEWER DISTRIBUTION 788.98 386696 9/11/2014 122414 FORKLIFTS. MINNESOTA INC. - ' 221.45 ANNUAL INSPECTION 352406 01S3910210 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 221.45 ANNUAL INSPECTION 352405 01S3910220 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.95 ANNUAL INSPECTION 352404 01S3910230 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 612.85 '386597 9111/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP RAGS 352126 1006258207 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 15.00 386598 9/11/2014 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE ` 27.89 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352567 090814 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 27.89 386599 9/11/2014 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 23.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352568 090514 5919:6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 23.52 386600 9/11/2014 116192 GOLIATH HYDRO -VAC INC. 940.00 VAC STORM PIPE 00001633 352409 18918 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 940.00 386601 9/1112014 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 2,024.10 AUG 2014 SERVICE 00001634 352410 123938 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,024.10 CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING GENERALSTORM SEWER DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 9/11/2014 121266 GREAT: RIVERS PRINTING CITY OF EDINA 51.00 - EXEMPTION CARDS 352569 Council Check Register by. GL 1470.4329 51.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 386605 911112014 102126 GREG'LESSMAN SALES . 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check -# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386601 9/11/2014 100780 'GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 386606 Continued... 386602 9/11/2014 134806 HAGEN, RON 161103 GRAINGER 2.90 PARKING PERMITS REFUND 36.00 WELDING GLOVES 00005638 352187 9525586971 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 352570 139.32 PRESSURE GAUGES 00005638 - 352187 9525586971 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS . 111.28 AIR FILTERS 00005638 352186 9525925930 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 60.80 GARAGE DOOR LUBE 00005640 352305 9528045124 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 160.28 SAFETY GLASSES 60001701 352412 9528208565 1646.6610, SAFETY EQUIPMENT 9/11/2014 91.92 WASP /HORNET KILLER 00001705 352411 9528507560 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00 RESPIRATORS, LEATHER GLOVES 00005573. 352306 9529594161 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 277.60 DISINFECTING WIPES, GLOVES 00005573 352306 9529594161 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 483.39 HAND DRYERS 352304 9529594179 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 95.51 EAR PLUGS 352413 9533037835 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 192.62 CABINET FOR AMMO 352414 9533037850 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,848.72 386603 9/11/2014 - 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 78.25 352229 170951 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 364.50 352231 170953 6862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,610.25 352230 171140 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 182.25 352332 171142 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 386604 9/11/2014 121266 GREAT: RIVERS PRINTING 51.00 - EXEMPTION CARDS 352569 40626 1470.4329 51.00 386605 911112014 102126 GREG'LESSMAN SALES . 567.72 GOLF TEES 352415 53089 5440.5511 567.72 386606 9111/2014 134806 HAGEN, RON 2.90 PARKING PERMITS REFUND 352570 090314 1000.2039 40.00, PARKING PERMITS REFUND 352570 090314 4090.4751 42.90 386607 9/11/2014 134797 HANNAN, REBECCA 403.00 ARTCLASSREFUND 352307 REFUND 5101.4607 403.00 386608: 9/11/2014 100797 HAWKINS'INC.' AMBULANCE FEES 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION PUBLIC PROGRAMS PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE PARKING PERMITS CLASS REGISTRATION GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 . - Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/1112014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386608 9/11/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. Continued... 4,032.70 CHEMICALS 00001246 352417 3639223 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,032.70 386609 9111/2014 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 884.10 SEPT 2014 COBRA 352419 50225427 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 12,166.55 SEPT 2014 PREMIUMS 352418 50227340 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 13, 050.65 386610 9/11/2014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES .352571 36161 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 386611 9/1112014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 250.00 MAILING LABELS 352308 2014 -46 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 250.00 386612 , 9/11/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER - 669.73 BOOKING FEES 352420 1000048861 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 669.73 - 386613 9/11/2014 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY-TREASURER 763.20 RADIO FLEET FEES 352421 1000048261 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 352422 1000048817 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 913.20 386614. 9/1112014_ - 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 3,156.20 OFFICE FURNITURE 352423 547856 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 553.80 OFFICE CHAIR 352424 547857 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,107.60 OFFICE CHAIRS 352424 547857 - 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 4,817.60 386615 9/1112014 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING / 892.50 FIELD PAINT 00001934 352425 103383 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 892.50 386616 9/11/2014 134806 HOFFMAN,ANNA 20.29 CONCESSIONS OVERCHARGE 352572 REFUND 5301.4521 CONCESSION SALES AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 20.29 386617 9111/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386617 9/1112014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 1,651.50 352232 719596 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 85.50 352502 720243 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 85.50 352501 720597 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,240.50 352333 721045 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,063.00 386618 9111/2014' - 103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND 40.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9121/14 352162 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 40.00 386619 9/11/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 333.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352426 090414 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE - TREES & MAINTENANCE 333.76 386620 9/11/2014 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 276.70 PRINTER RIBBONS 00004403 352127 222771 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 276.70 386621 9/11/2014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 330.75 352503 22422 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 330.75 386622 9/11/2014 123036 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY BAND ,150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT- 9/14/14 352159 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - O_ THER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 386623 9/11/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 150.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 352188 JJ5519 1130.6124 WEB'DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 386624 9/11/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST.'OF MINN 11.20- 352237 2031184 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING 4,302.30 352234 2255084 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17.55 352233 2255085 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,917.70 352236 2255088 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.55 352235 2255120 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,225.10 352235 2255120 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,080.28 352506 2255130 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 77.85 352504 2255131 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 90.00 352505 2255132 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council _Check °Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary - 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 386624 9/11/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 19,717.13 386625 9111/2014. 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 329.42 REPAIR COUPLING 00006234 352189 69360588 5422.6611 329.42 386628 9/11/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.16 352150 1930667 5842.5512 1,275.68 352239 1934967 5822.5513 178.32 352243 1934968 5822.5512 1,996.42 352238 1934969 5822.5513 160.82 352244 1934970 5822.5512 - 118.14 352240 1934971 5822.5513 65.16 352245 1934972 5822.5512 1,714.93 352246 1934974 5822.5512 545.80 352520 1934975. 5822.5512 .49 352344 1934977 5842.5512 .29 352242 1934978 5862.5512 545.80 352337 1934987 5842.5512 1,797.28 352345 1934988 5842.5512 3,631.51 352241 1934996 5862.5512 545.80 352342 1934997 5862.5512 120.00 352334 1935541 5842.5512 1,655.88 352524 1939597 5822.5513 1.16 352511 1939598 5842.5513 7.54 352343 1939599 5862.5513 742.77 352525 1939600 5822.5513 25.16 352519 1939601 5822.5515 142.78 352523 1939602 5822.5513 235.67 352518 1939603 5822.5512 2.32 352509 1939604 5842.5513 1,818.56 352510 1939605 5842.5513 381.77 352517 1939606 5822.5512- 1.07 352341 1939607 5862.5512 - 2,413.97 352512 1939608 5842.5513 1,635.20 352508 1939609 5842.5513 417.87 352513 193961D 5842.5512 1,428.13 352507 1939611 5842.5513 2,683.81 352514 1939612 5842.5512 2,312.15 352515 1939613 5842.5512 ,. Subledger Account Description Continued... IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 15 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 386629 9/1112014 CITY OF EDINA 111018 KEEPRS INC: YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by GL 81.58 UNIFORMS 00003815 352429 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 386628 9/11/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 345.24 LOCK CORES 60001655 1,816.36 352516 1939614 5842.5512 345.24 8,865.98 352340 1939615 5862.5513 386631 9/11/2014 267.48 352336 1939616 5862.5512 1,850.41 352347 1939617 5862.5513 090514 62.97 352348 1939618 5862.5513 361.91 352338 1939619 5862.5512 134675 KOSKINEN,.MATTHEW 1,045.34 352346 1939620 5862:5513 87.76 MILEAGE/ PARKING 1,686.98 352335 1939621 5862.5512 87.76 7,710.83 352339 1939622 5862.5512 386633 9/11/2014 204.48 352521 1941287 5842.5513 335:08 352522 1941288 5842.5513 2.40- 352350 630631 5842.5512 352190 9302684153 23.75- 352349 630632 5842.5512 FITTINGS 00005540 352431 53.16- 352153 631187 5842.5513 1,314.17 50.34- 352152 631683 5842.5512 82.00- 352151 631684 5842.5513 386634 9/11/2014 130699 LEONARD, RICHARD 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 16 Subledger Account Description 386629 9/1112014 1553.6260 111018 KEEPRS INC: YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 81.58 UNIFORMS 00003815 352429 253635 -01 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 81.58 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 386630 9/11/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 113212 KENDELL,DOORS.& HARDWARE INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 345.24 LOCK CORES 60001655 352430' S1012575 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 345.24 386631 9/11/2014 134811 KLAPPERICK; SEAN 18.25 TANKER ENDORSEMENT FEE 352573 090514 18.25 386632 9/11/2014 134675 KOSKINEN,.MATTHEW 87.76 MILEAGE/ PARKING 352574 090814 87.76 386633 9/11/2014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 482.82 WASHERS, FITTINGS, SCREWS 00005537 352190 9302684153 831.35 FITTINGS 00005540 352431 9302698223 1,314.17 386634 9/11/2014 130699 LEONARD, RICHARD 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 16 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 1553.6260 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 919/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17, Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/1112014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386634 9/11/2014 130599 LEONARD, RICHARD Continued... 65.00 TOWEL CLEANING 352575 090514 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 65.00 386635 9111/2014 105677 MAGC 15.00 DUPLICATE PLAQUE 264592 061611 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES OLD COMMUNICATIONS 15.00 386636 9111/2014 131686 MAILFINANCE INC. 194.97 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 352434 N4876519 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 194.97 386637 9/11/2014 134612 MAJICA; SERGIO 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 9/18/14 352160 082014 5760.6136- PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 386638 9/11/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12,065.44 UNLEADED FUEL 00005637 352435 864312 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,065.44 386639 9111/2014 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 280.00 HOSTING FEES 352191 198 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 280.00 386640 9/11/2014 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 36.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352437 090414 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 36.96 386641 9/11/2014 100885 METRO SALES INC 7,445.00 RICOH COPIER - FIRE DEPT 352440 INV56756 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 7,445.00 386642 9/1112014 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 365,522.72 SEWER SERVICE - OCT 2014 352309 0001037559 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 365,522.72 386643 9/11/2014 127639 MIDWAY FORD 26,076.00 2015 FORD PICKUP 00005168 352380 100209 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 26,076.00 386644 9/1112014 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386644 9111/2014 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Continued... 1,064.38 STATION SUPPLIES 352441 35735 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,064.38 386645 9/1112014 134038 MIDWEST.CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS LLC 141,735.57 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO..5 352552 082814 01417.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 141,735.57 386646 9/11/2014 120926 MILBERT'S LOCK S SAFE CO. LLC 626.00 DOOR REPAIR " 352193 14 -57186 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 626.00 386647 9/11/2014 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 194.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352194 090214 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 194.08 386648 9/11/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,915.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001628 352442 34779 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,915.00 386649 9/11/2014 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 24,345.79 WATER PURCHASE -AUG 2014 352310 .431- 0005.300 -9/ 5913.6601- WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 14 24,345.79 386650 9/1112014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 16.09 WINDOW WASHING 352576 928027577 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 5.36 WINDOW WASHING 352577 928027957 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.45 386651 9/11/2014 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,048.00 ASPHALT EMULSION 352443 71350 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,048.00 386652 9/1112014 134808 MINNESOTA RUSCO 104.30 PERMIT REFUND 352578 ED133390 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 104.30 386653 9111/2014 134809 MINNESOTA TREE SURGEONS 3,218.25 TREE REMOVAL 00001721 352579 5836 DREWAVE 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES 8 MAINTENANCE 3.218.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 114.75 CITY OF EDINA 352446 963273100 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register by GL 114.75 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 386656 911112014 9/11/2014 — 9111/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386653 9111/2014 352195 134809 MINNESOTA TREE SURGEONS 1170.6107 Continued... 386654 9111/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 32.00 ANGLE 00005408 352444 0105418 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 124528 NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 33.36 SPRAYER PARTS 00001711 352445 0106408 -IN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,925.00 65.36 352580 SFT0000099631 1400.6104 --386655 9/11/2014 104350 NIKE USA INC. 1,925.00 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE 114.75 MERCHANDISE 352446 963273100 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 114.75 386656 911112014 130227 NIKUNEN, JESSICA 223.44 .. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352195 090214 1170.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES 223.44 .. 386657 9111/2014 124528 NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 1,925.00 TASER CLASS 352580 SFT0000099631 1400.6104 CONFERENCES &'SCHOOLS- POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,925.00 - 386658 9/11/2014 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 65.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 352447 706141332001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 65.33 386659 9/11/2014 132671 OLSON, BRIAN 237.76 TRAINING EXPENSES 352448 082914 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 237.76 386660 9/11/2014 101659 ORKIN 142.22 PEST CONTROL 352311 96029523 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 142.22 386661 9/11/2014 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 352.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352582 090414 1644.6107- MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 352.80 386662 9/11/2014 130917 OWL ENGINEERING & EMC TEST LABS INC. 750.00 INTERFERENCE STUDY 352583 3409 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 750.00 386663 9/11/2014 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 34.00 AIR TESTING 352449 1403268 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUORµ 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9/11/2014 - 9111/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 386663 .9/11/2014 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 34.00 386664 9/11/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 320.50 352249 8462379 -IN 5822.5513 294.75 352248 8462802 -IN 5822.5513 81.25- 352251 8463359 -CM 5842.5513 3,619.25 352352 8463581 -IN 5842.5513 162.50 352351 8463591 -IN 5822.5513 2,173.71 352250 8463594 -IN 5862.5513 6,489.46 386665 9/11/2014 121040 PC ADVENTURES INC. 124.94 REPAIRS 352450 9799 5821.6180 124.94 386666 9/11/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 250.60 352156 00631751 5842.5515 199.88 352451 42672067 5430.5510 450.48 386667 9/1112014 134802 PETER MUSTY LLC 5,000.00 WVV SAP PROJECT - PAYMENT 1 352584 245 9235.6103 5,000.00 386668 9/11/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,999.51 352253 2658486 5822.5513 1,081.91 352252 2658487 5822.5512 163.48 352254 2658488 5822.5513 1,981.16 352531 2661410 5842.5513 47.66 352528 2661411 5822.5512 215.88 352527 2661412 5822.5513 2,309.40 352355 2661413 5862.5513 171.48 352356 2661414 5862.5515 610.48 352526 2661415 5822.5513 535.31 352529 2661416 5842.5512 350.36 352530 2661417 5842.5513 359.54 352353 2661418 5862.5512 289.68 352354 2661419 5862.5513 10,115.85 Subledger. Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MANE 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH.ST SELLING VERNON SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUORµ 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386669 9/11/2014 104236 PLATENBERG, CATHY Continued... 125.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/18/14 352161 082014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 125:00 - 386670 9/11/2014 100968 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 352452 4381438 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.89 386671 9/11/2014 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 100.00 GPS PLAN 352312 IN200- 1003022 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 . 386672 9111/2014 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 1,200.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 352585 CITY PROJECT 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,200.00 386673 9/11/2014 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 109.90 352532 IND003924 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 109.90 386674 9/11/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 301.99 SOFTENER SALT 352198 00303870 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 593.00 SOFTENER SALT 352457 00303947 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 894.99 386675 9/1112014 134794 RUNNELS, D.L. 18.00 OLLI CLASS REFUND 352199 REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS i 18.00 386676 9/11/2014 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 7,980.00 TURF CARE 352458 908165636 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,872.00 OAK WILT MONITORING 352459 908195211 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 9,852.00 386677 9111/2014 100988 SAFETYKLEEN 170.31 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 352313 64465293 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 170.31 386678 9/11/2014 " 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 29.91 0402 373069350 352200 9/01/14 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 29.91 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 386678 9/1112014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 386679 9/11/2014 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 47.50 NAME PLATES 352460 44893 1100.6406 47.50 386680 9/11/2014 134665 SINYKIN, NANCY 1,000.00 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE: -. 352201 FLOODING/REFUND 5913.6180 1,000.00 386681 911112014 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 1,132.79 REFRIGERATOR MAINTENANCE 00006340 352461 50058 5421.6102 1,132.79 386682 9/11/2014 134810 SOUTH DALE OFFICE LLC / KADO 1,824.11 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 352587 6750 FRANCE AVE 5900.2015 1,824.11 386683 9/1112014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 316.78 352534 1196681 5822.5512 322.25 352256 1196682 5822.5513 1,772.94 352255 1196683 5822.5513 1,834.41 352358 1196685 5842.5512 4,620.69 352257 1196688 5842.5513 1,166.93 352258 1196691 5862.5513 96.75 352261 1197304 5822.5513 601.25 352157 1197305 5842.5513 742.00 352359 1198639 5822.5513 3,788.35 352535 1198640 5842.5513 1,433.61 352357 1198641 5842.5512 9,548.90 352260 1198642 5862.5513 1,697.71 352259 1198643 5862.5512 735.34 352533 1200147 5822.5513 1,203.05 352536 5006908 5842.5513 29,880.96 386684 9/11/2014 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 300.00 RECODE SQUAD LOCKS 352203 141597 1400.6215 300.00 RECODE SQUAD LOCKS 352202 141598 1400.6215 600.00 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 22 Business Unit CITY COUNCIL DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD 1MNE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK.SELLING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014. 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit " 386685 9/1112014 134798 SPIELMAN; MICHELE Continued... 10.00 BOWLING CLUB OVERPAYMENT 352314 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.00 386686 9/11/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 210.00 352537 3719 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 210.00 - 386687 9/11/2014 101015 STREICHERS - 209.00 AMMO FOR INTRO CLASS 352204 11107609 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 49.99 RAIN JACKET 352462 11109876 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 258.99 386688 9/11/2014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 55.00 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005349 352316 10126613 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.75 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005554 352317 10126977 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 681.24 TIRES 00005609 352464 10127582 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN -- 793.99 386689 9/11/2014 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 133.00 MERCHANDISE 352465 196162 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 133.00 386690 9/1112014 122611 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 175.00 MOVIE RENTAL 352205 DB1960704 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 375.00 MOVIE RENTAL 352206 DB1962490 5760.6136 PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 550.00 386691 9/1112014 134796 TAGGART, TODD I 231.28 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 352207 REIMBURSE 05526.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN' RICHMOND HILLS PK " 231.28 386692 9/11/2014 130357 TASC 140.00 JULY 2014 COBRAADMIN FEES 352466 IN352989 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 140.00 386693 9/11/2014 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE I 3,116.48 WETTING AGENT 352129 S196749 -IN 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAIN OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,116.48 386694 i I 9/11/2014 106374 THERMA -STOR PRODUCTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386694 9/11/2014 106374 THERMASTOR PRODUCTS Continued... 130.53 DEHUMIDIFIER PARTS 00001632 352467 2709016RI 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 130.53 386695 9/1112014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 149.00 352208 00772189 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 149.00 386696 9/11/2014 132615 TIMBERLAND HOMES AND REMODELING 2,500.00 ED126546 PERMIT REFUND 352589 4620 W 58TH ST 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 386697 9/11/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 352.00 PARK BOARD MEETINGS 352130 •M20743 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 176.00 8/19 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 352468 M20744 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 528.00 386698 9/11/2014 101474 TITLEIST 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 24 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT CLUB HOUSE INSPECTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,571.09 GOLF. BALLS 352469 0065618 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 447.91 GOLF BALLS ` 352470 0076176 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,019.00 386699 9/11/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 825.60 352262 223 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 825.60 386700 9111/2014 120595 T- MOBILE iq fin 352588 477067848 -8/14 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 352588 477067848 -8/14 1554.6230 386701 9/11/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 173.25 WELDER 00005632 352318 10041158 1553.6580 138.96 ARGON, WELDING GLOVES 00005634 352319 10041374 1553.6580 312.21 386702 9/11/2014 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 355.50 REPAIR WATER LEAK 352471 16030 5511.6180 355.50 386703 9/11/2014 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN.- MIS WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 i CITY OP EDINA 919/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary i 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Docl',No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 386703 9/11/2014 131040. TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE Continued... 112.50 AUG 2014 USAGE 352472 26963.4- 8/2014 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.50 i 386704 9/11/2014 103218 TRI -STATE BOBCAT i 544.50 HYDRO SEEDER 352320 R21908 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 544.50 386705 9111/2014 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 80.37 MOUNTS 00005539 362321 LC00025947 1553.6530 REPAIR'PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.37 386706 9/11/2014 I 105243 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 10,328.35 50TH REMODEL 352590 214032A -4 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 10,328.35 I 386707 9/11/2014 130572 TWIN CITIES APPLIANCE I 244.77 DRYER REPAIRS 352474 143113 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - 244.77 386708 - - i 9/11/2014 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 318.45 SEED, MULCH 00005820 352322 33340 - 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 318.45 i i 386709 9111/2014 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH-AMERICA) INC. 82.24 BELT, PULLEY 00005505 352209 122136862 -001 1553:6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 82.24 386710 9/11/2014 102212 UPBEAT.INC 8,000.00 RECYCLING CONTAINERS 00001437 352591; 553378.' 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 11;728.00 RECYCLING CONTAINERS 00001437 352591.553378; 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 19,728.00 i 386711 9/11/2014 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. _ 5,579.66 REPAIR WATER.SERVICE 00001627 352475 I 20513 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 5,579.66 f i. 386712 9/11/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 740.42 TOWELS, TISSUE, CUPS '352477 322089 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 567.81 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 352131- 322111 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 532.80 CAN LINERS 00001704 352476 322421 -00 - .1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount -- Supplier/ Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 386712 9111/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. Continued... 5510.6103 5822.5513 5822.5513 1600.4390.49 5913.6180 1495.4112 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 26 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING BARNYARD BOOGIE PARKADMIN. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,841.03 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 386713 9/11/2014 YORK SELLING 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 1,980.00 SEPT 2014 SERVICES 352478 31963 YORK SELLING 5862.5512 1,980.00 VERNON SELLING. 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 386714 9/1112014 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 253.25 50TH ST SELLING 352266 62452 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 269.25 YORK SELLING 352361- 62464 522.50 386715 9/11/2014 130839 WALTON'S HOLLOW 650.00 SEPT 20 EVENT 352210. 4814 -BAL 650.00 386716 9/11/2014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 339.94 LOCATE WATER LEAK 00001761 352592 5311 339.94 386717 9/1112014 134807 WATER DOCTORS 18.80 PERMIT REFUND 352593 ED133731 18.80 386718 9/11/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 252.48 352269 516931 639.96 352158 517207 1,218.76 352540 517706 856.78 352364 517707 132.00 352539 517766 88.00 352538 517768 3,187.98 386720 9/11/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,162.23 352274 1080220633 779.17 352276 1080220704 91.15 352277 1080220705 260.50 352279 1080220706 1,146.65 352275 1080220707 14.85 352278 1080220708 3,971.27 352365 1080220712 5510.6103 5822.5513 5822.5513 1600.4390.49 5913.6180 1495.4112 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page - 26 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING BARNYARD BOOGIE PARKADMIN. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING. 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - ; 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 386720 9/11/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 1,564.10 352280 1080221931 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING _ 3,582.70 352369 1080221932 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING • 2,200.80 352273 1080223273 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1 2,063.18 352272 1080223294- 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,149.50 352281 1080223295 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 73.15 352282 1080223296 .5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,100.40 352541 1080223297 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,091.29 352542 1080223298 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,089.80 352367 1080223299 5822.5514 COST,OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,301.20 352271 1080223300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 866.24 352368 1080223301 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING ' 3,162.55 352270 1080223302 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,597.35 352370. .1080223303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING " 37.15 352366 1080223314 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,372.37 352543 1080224492 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 41.92- 352371 2080051926 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48.00- 352373 2080053418 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.00- 352378 2080053431 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14.00- 352377 2080053442 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 637.00- 352376 2080053448 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 51.24- 352375 2080053479 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 407.68- 352374 2080053534 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.17- 352372 2080055035 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 37,437.59 386721 " 9/11/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 2,506.45. 352285 1090281038 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 130.50 352284 1090281039 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 43.00 352283 1090281040 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 844.52 352286 1090281154 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 614.50 352551 1090281155 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 333.00 352550 1090281156 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 319.80 352546 1090282051 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,890.95 352545 1090284450 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 320.50 352544 1090284533 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,202.90 352548 1090284534 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 899.10 352549 1090284535 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 352547 1090284536 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14,126.72 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description` 386722 9/11/2014 134051 WRASE, PATRICK Continued... 123.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 352594 090514 1261.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 123.76 386723 9/11/2014 105740 WSB &ASSOCIATES INC. 1,807.00, TRAFFIC STUDY 352479 2- 01686 -570 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,807.00 386724 9/11/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,228.12 51- 4159265 -8 352216 424699433 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER 113.23 51- 5938955 -6 352134 424926135 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER 86.44 51- 6692497 -0 352132 424939881 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER 34.54 51- 8102668 -0 352133 424958184 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 10,228.06 51- 4827232 -6 352135 425097292 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER 957.97 51- 5634814 -2 352136 425111678 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 577.92 51- 6229265 -9 352219 425122728 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,746.56 51- 6229265 -9 352219 425122728 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER 10,537.65 51- 6955679 -8 352217 425132936 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER 409.31 51- 6046826 -0 352218 425142820 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER 565.88 51- 9251919 -0 352137 425165750 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER 178.18 51- 9337452 -8 352211 425165781 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER.. 34.90 51- 4151897 -6 352212 425430382 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 37.54 51- 7567037 -0 352213 425483669 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 7,394.41 51- 0837548 -4 352324 425545869 5915.6185 LIGHT &POWER 1,468.25 51- 6979948 -4 352323 425641842 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,926.85 51- 6979948 -4 352323 425641842 5861.6185 LIGHT ,& POWER 2,413.14 -51- 6979948 -4 352323 425641842 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER 392.39 51- 9422326 -6 352325 425672717 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 33,903.97 51- 4888627 -1 352595 425771196 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 10,740.78 51- 6824328 -7 352596 426159383 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER 87,976.09 386726 9/11/2014 129331 YOUNG, PAUL 175.00 SEPT 20 EVENT 352214 KIDS DJ 1600.4390.49 BARNYARD BOOGIE 175.00 366726 9/11/2014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 141.35 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 352480 54060947 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 141.35 1,264,669.67 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals 9/9/2014 11:39:12 Page- 28 Business Unit CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLANNING PSTF OCCUPANCY AQUATIC WEEDS CIVILIAN DEFENSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR POOL OPERATION STORM LIFT STATION MAINT YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROMENADE EXPENSES STREET LIGHTING REGULAR BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR WATER TREATMENT - 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE PARKADMIN. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS r i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation 1,264,669.67 Grand Total i CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/11/2014 — 9/11/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account-No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,138,939.27 A/P ACH Payment 125,730.40 Total Payments 1,264,669.67 9/912014 11:39:12 Page- 29 Business Unit R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2014 11:39:21 Council Check Summary Page- 1 9/11/2014 - 9/11/2014 Company 01000 GENERAL FUND 02200 DNU OLD COMMUNICATIONS FUND 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 05700 �EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 09235 VALLEY VIEWANOODDALE TIF DIST Amount 194,977.75 15.00 1,275.52 168,547.23 33, 521.00 403.00 10,248.35 26,739.25 65,700.15 9,351.25 45,332.37 1,090.88 227,485.01 421,750.47 4,527.91 48,704.53 5,000.00 Report Totals 1,264,669.67 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 16, 2014 a e, v �o ,eeB Agenda Item #: IV. C. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -97 Appointing Election judges For November 4, 2014 General Election Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Minnesota Election Law 20413.21 requires that the governing body of the municipality appoint election judges to administer the polling places at least 25 days before each election. The General Election will be held November 4, 2014 with Absentee Balloting opening September 19, 2014. In order for Absentee Judges to begin their work in a timely manner we must appoint them at this time. The attached Resolution 2014 -97 lists the persons intended to serve Election judges and Absentee Judges in alphabetical order. We will be placing twelve to fourteen persons in each polling location at the General, plus running an Absentee Ballot Board. In addition, we will train alternates to substitute in case others cannot serve. When assigning the judges to a precinct we must maintain the party balance in each precinct and on our absentee board as required by statutes. I am happy to report that we are once again using high school students as student election judges. In addition, this year, Hennepin County will be acting on behalf of the City of Edina as a part of our Absentee Ballot Board so they are named in our appointing resolution. also ask for the authority to replace or substitute judges as necessary before Election Day. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -97 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO 2014 -97 APPOINTING GENERAL, ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 4, GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS;;.,Minnesota Election Law 2046.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in "tle office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina General Election Judges for the November 4, 2014 Primary Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Edina City Council also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 2046.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Edina Absentee Ballot Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 16th day of September 2014. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Stacy Abena Katherine Aby Rita Acker Kristine Allinson John Alt Wendy Amundson Mary Louise Anderson Anja Awoap Mary Balogh Shannon Beaulieu Mary Becker Ellie Bender Sheryl Bertrand Cynthia Beuerlein Kenrick Bjelland Eric Bjelland Vivian Bjorn Juliet Boemer Katherine Bogert Janice Bolin Mary Book Holly Borgen Katherine Bradbury ZoeAnne Brandberg Adele Brellenthin Paige Briggs David Briscoe Kathy Bronner Alyssa Burch James Burnett Harriet Busdicker Christine Campion Linda Cardwell Nancy Carlson Jane Carpenter Pauline Carroll Katherine Chamberlain Nicholas Chamberlain Marlys Chase Julie Ann Chatleain Marilyn Christiansen Judy Cipolla Susan Clark David Coker Roberta Cole Abby Conrad Virginia Conterato Eileen Cooke Madeline Cooperman Rick Cousins 2014 General Election Election Judges Marian Cracraft Jack Cracraft Colleen Crew Deborah Croker Richard Cronstrom Spencer Crum Judie Dale Byron Dale Tierra Daniels Kevin Dans Daniel Dauth Allison Davis Gloria DeBerg Amy Demarest Patricia Dill John Dimmock Erika Ding Lisa Domke Mary Donahue Wendy Donovan Suzanne Douglas Frank Drake Sheila Duhn Kim Dulas Jillian Dunn Sally Dunn Erika Eberlein Emma Eberlein Don Eidam Jeanene Engebretson Josephine (Josie) Fay Laurie Fetterman Bob Fiedler Paul Fink Grace Fittipaldi Lillian Fix John Fossum Ginny Frey Kathy Frey Suzanne Fuluvaka Valerie Geurts Amir Arnold Gharbi Devorah Goldstein Ruth Gough Patricia Gries George Griffiths Muza Habeck Barbara Halloran Eugene Haman Judith Hansen U 2014 General Election Election Judges Griffin Hansen Keith Kostuch Logan Hansen Martha Kouatli Brian Hansen Hana.Koudsi George Harris Jenna Claire Kramer Buddy Hasnudeen Judy Labonne Mary 10 Hasnudeen Fred Lafferty Joan Hasper Alexis Lance Lisa Hatzung James Landberg Cheryl Heley Mary Landberg Marie Hidem Paul Lane James Higgins Karen Lanz Madison Hobbs Gertrude Lappin Sandra Hoglin Catherine Lee Eileen Hokkanen Donald Lehnhoff Jack Holden Karen Leon Alan Holst Rachel Lewis- Johnson Nancy Hopf Susan Lindsay Judy Hoppe Bob Lindsey Eva Horstman Sophia Litkewitsch Caitlin Houle Mitzi Litman Myra Hykes Ellen Loewenberg Matthew Jackson Cynthia Loveland Patricia Jackson Alan Lu Cecilia Jaisle William Lucas Rosemary Jellen Barbara Maeder Sarah Jerstad Linda Maetzold Suzanne Jiwani Robert Mallon Allen Johnson James Martin Madison Johnson Boyd Mast Shirley Johnson Patti Mazzara Grant Johnson Frank McGoldrick Lily Jones Matt McHugh Lynn Jorgenson Susan McKusick Mary Kachan Maria Melken Malooly Ann R Kapaun Marvin Menzel Dalia Katz Nancy Miller Paul Keck Sydney Monsou Ann Keenan Pat Montez Joan.Keiner Beth Montgomery Louise Kellams Cooper Morrow Sanjana Ketchum Maggie Moynihan Sharon Kiker Sophia Munic Jessica Kingston Keshini Nathan Mavis Klefsaas Barbara Nazarian Katie Klevesahl Laura Nelson Sara Klos Susan Niefeld Marcia Koester Kimberly Nissen Gayle Kohlbry Daniel Nye Janet Kopp Patti Olander Julia Kosters Rosalia (Sally) Olsen Ordell O'Neill Norman Owens Louis Pappas Darla Paulson Wain Pearce Cindy Perusse Heather Petermann Ronald Pfannenstein Betty Pollitt Linda Presthus Sid Ramesh Teresa Razidlo Jack Reany Karen Reed Eric Rehm Nathan Richman Julie Risser - Jennifer Roach Casey Robinson William Rodgers Judith, Rodgers Mary Rogers Robert Rohlf Luann Rosenthal - Erickson Harry Rothberg Carol Rothe Emma Rowland Milagros Rush William Rush Emily Ruwe Lauren Rvrik Kirsten Sakaguchi Noah Sawatzky Louise Schneider Connie Schramm Aundria Schreiner Carol Schultz Nancy Schwappach Sara Schwiebert Amy Scott Hilory Seaton Marty Sedoff Samantha Seiler Marion Selid Ezra Sergent- Leventhal Floy Sims Cameron Sjalander Michael Skelly Mary Skoy . Joann Skumatz 2014 General Election Election Judges Judy Smith Del Smith Ruth Smith Ansel Smolund Lynne Speckhals Duane Mary Stanton Vivian Steblay Sofia Stevenin Jan Stone Lee Strang Isabella Swanson Ann Swanson` Philothea Sweet Isaac Swenson Ann Thompson Michael Thompson Kathryn Thorndyke Andrea Tiggas Donna Tilsner Donna Tremmel David Truckenmiller Julie Turnbull Janet Ulvin Deb Waldin Donna Wallander Terry Wander Linda Wandrei Jenny Weber Katie Webert Paul Wehrmeister Brett Weicht Katrina Weinert John Weiser Mike Welbaum Emma Weldon Wayne Wenger Ardis Wexler Grace. White Patricia Williams Amanda Williams Reginald Wimbiz Gerald Witowski Kathryn Woxland Mary Yee Margaret Zverinova To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -96 Setting the Hearing Dates for Special Assessments, Public Health Abatement & Utility Certification (10/21/2014) Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. . Information / Background: Every year the City holds special assessment public hearings for the purpose of considering the various improvement and maintenance projects undertaken throughout the City of Edina which will be specially assessed . against the., benefitted property owners. In order to hold the hearing, the Council must adopt a resolution calling said hearings. Staff recommends that the hearing be set on October 21, 2014, for the following improvements: Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AG -14 Weed Mowing — Imp. No. WD -14 Tree Removal — Imp. No: TR -14 50th & France Maintenance — Improvement No. M -14 Grandview Square Maintenance — Improvement G -14 Mendelssohn A Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -393 Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -394 Braemar Hills B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -395 St. Patricks Lane, Improvement No. BA -396 Gleason Circle, Improvement No. BA -397 Lake Edina A Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -398 The public hearing for the certification of delinquent utilities DU -14 and certification of abatement of public health nuisance AB -14 should also be set on October 21, 2014 Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -96 City of Edina City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-96 CALLING PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND DELINQUENT UTILITIES AND ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON OCTOBER 21, 2014 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 21st day of October, 2014, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such Improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to assessments for the following projects: Aquatic Weeds — Imp. No. AQ -14 Weed Mowing — Imp. No. WD -14 Tree Removal — Imp. No. TR -14 50th & France Maintenance — Improvement No. M -14 Grandview Square Maintenance — Improvement G -14 Mendelssohn A Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -393 Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -394 Braemar Hills B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -395 St. Patricks Lane, Improvement No. BA -396 Gleason Circle, Improvement No. BA -397 Lake Edina A Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, Improvement No. BA -398 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 21sT day of October, 2014, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such certification of Delinquent Utilities - DU -14, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such certification will be given an opportunity to be heard. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 21sT day of October, 2014, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such certification of abatement of public nuisance AB -14 and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such certification will be given an opportunity to be heard. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that the City Clerk is directed to publish and mail notices of the aforementioned public hearings. Attest: ADOPTED thisl6th day of September 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20, City Clerk To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item M W.E. From: Communications & Technology Services Director Jennifer Bennerotte Action Discussion ❑ Date:. Sept. 19, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Website Links Policy Action Requested: Approve the City's amended Website Links Policy Information / Background: This year, the Communications & Technology Services Department is reviewing and updating policies related, to its work. The Website Links Policy, first adopted by the City Council in 2002, was updated primarily to reflect the City's current organizational structure and incorporate references to social media. City of Edina Website Links Policy The purpose of the City of Edina's websites and social media pages is to provide information about the City's government, services and attractions. The City's websites and social media pages may provide links to other external websites that complement, enhance or add to this information. The City is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, the content of any linked website. To qualify for inclusion on the City's websites or one of its social media pages, a linked website must complement, supplement, enhance or add to the information and/or City services provided on the City of Edina's websites or social media pages. Further, it must present content that can be categorized as "community" information. 4n general, this would include: • Governmental and educational institutions such as Edina Public Schools. • Generally recognized community organizations such as the First John Philip Memorial Band and Edina Chamber of Commerce. • City- recognized neighborhood associations. • Organizations providing information about art, cultural and recreational activities in the City such as those created by athletic associations. • Organizations providing information about tourist attractions in the City such as Explore Edina. The City will not provide links to websites for: • Businesses, unless said business is run by City, operates out of a City facility such as the Hornets Nest at Braemar Arena or otherwise fits the criteria noted above. • .,Churches, synagogues, mosques or other religious or spiritual facilities or entities. • Candidates for local, state or federal offices. • Political organizations or other organizations whose primary mission is advocating a position on or conducting discussions of local, state or federal political issues. • Individual or personal home pages and/or websites. • Pornographic or other material that violates an established City policy. In most cases, the City will not provide links to external websites from its home page. The City of Edina will not sell ads on its websites. However, on web pages describing advertising opportunities available through the City, such as newsletter ads or dasherboards, the City may link to the sites of recent advertisers. Application Process Beginning Oct. 1, 2002, a formal request from outside organizations must be completed for a link to be included on the City of Edina's website. That request will be reviewed by the Communications & Technology Services Department, which will make recommendations to the City Manager as to whether or not the proposed link fits the criteria to be included on the site. The City Manager will make the final determination on all external links. ,1 To request a link be included on the City of Edina's website; a representative from the website's organization. must complete the following application process: 1. Apply in person at City Hall or call 952- 826 -0359 to receive an application in the mail or via email. 2. The application-isif6rwardMlol the Communications & Technology Services ' Department, which reviews and makes a recommendation to the City Manager regarding the appropriateness of the link. 3. If a link is approved by the City Manager, the City's Communications staff will post it on the City's website on a page determined by staff to be most appropriate. 4. The City's Communications staff will contact the applicant once the link is posted or if the application is.denied. The City reserves the right °to 'remove any link previously approved at its sole discretion. Websites with links from the City's site will be reviewed regularly to ensure compliance with this policy. Links to°websites that violate this policy will be immediately removed without notice. ADOPTED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 3, 2002. AMENDED SEPTEMBER 2014. City of Edina Website Links Policy The purpose of the City of Edina's websites and social media pages is to provide information about the City's government, services and attractions. The City "s websites and social media pages may provide links to other external websites that complement, enhance or add to this information. The City is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, the content of any linked website. The Gity my, To qualify for inclusion on the City's websites or one of its social media pages, a linked website must complement, supplement, enhance or add to the information and/ -or City services provided on the City of Edina's websites or social media pages. Further, it must present content that can be categorized as "community" information. In,gS gal, this would include: ; - Formatted: Font: Not sold • Governmental and educational institutions such as Edina Public Schools. • Generally recognized community organizations such as the First John Philip Memorial Band and Edina Chamber of Commerce. • City - recognized neighborhood associations. • Organizations providing information about art, cultural and recreational activities in the City such as those created by athletic associations. • Organizations providing information about tourist attractions in the City such as the Edina Chamber a fCe..,.,,°. °° Explore Edina. The City will2gtprovide links to websites for: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Formatted: Font: Not sold • Businesses, unless said business is run by City, operates out of a City facility such as the Hornets Nest at Braemar Arena'or otherwise fits the criteria noted above. • Churches, synagogues, mosques or other religious or spiritual facilities or entities. • Candidates for local, state; or federal offices. • Political organizations or other organizations whose primary mission is advocating a position on or conducting discussions of local, state or federal political issues_ • Individual or personal home pages and/or websites_ • Pornographic or of ..,.:,:° w °� °' °other material that violates an established City op licy. In most cases, tThe City will pot provide links to external websites from its home pale_ _ - - - Formatted: Font: Not Bold The City of Edina will not sell ads on its websites. However, on web pages describing advertising opportunities available through the City, such as newsletter ads or dasherboards the City may link to the sites of recent advertisers. ,Aepl!" i0n ,KpI gcess _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Formatted: Font: 12 pt, Bold, Font color: Auto Beginning Oct. 1, 2002, a formal request from outside organizations must be completed for a link to be included on the City of Edina's website. That request will be reviewed by the "r-at;el; Communications & Technology Services Department, which will make the Final de1i..«...inatienrecommendations to the City Manager as to whether or not the proposed link fits the criteria to be included on the site. The City Manager will make the final determination on all external links. To request a link be included on the City of Edina's website, a representative from the website's organization must complete the following application process. 1. Apply in person at City:HalI or call 952- 826 - 035953 6063 to receive an application in the mail or via email. 2. The application is forwarded to the AdEninestfafien Communications & Technology Services Department, which reviews and makes a recommendation to the City Manager regarding the appropriateness of the link. 3. If a link is approved by the City Manager, the City's w bmasterCommunications staff will post it on the City's website on a page determined by staff to be most appropriate. 4. The City's Communications Difeetff staff will contact the applicant once the link is posted or if the application is denied. The City reserves the right to remove any link previously approved at its sole discretion. Websites with links from the City's site will be reviewed yeafrMplarly to ensure compliance with this policy. Links to websites that violate this policy will be immediately removed without notice. ADOPTED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 3, 2002. AMENDED SEPTEMBER 2014. To: Mayor and city Council -- w911r� o e Cn O Agenda Item M IV.F From: Steven G rausam-Di rector of Liquor Operations Action. Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Request for Purchase- Edina Liquor 50th Street Store Remodeling Project Action Requested: Approve bids as presented. Information / Background: Edina Liquor remodeled its Southdale and Grandview stores over the last twelve years to keep current with retail trends and stay competitive in the marketplace. The store at 50th Street was last remodeled in 1998 and is in need of significant updates to increase sales and reflect the Edina Liquor brand image we convey at our other stores. This investment is especially important given the increased competition in the liquor market. Major components of the proposed remodeling project include: • Raising drop ceiling to ten -foot height suspended ceiling. (Not in 2013 CIP Estimate) • Replacing carpet with vinyl flooring- same flooring as Southdale • Replacing all lighting with high efficiency LED lighting • Replacing all of wood liquor shelving with standard mental Lozier shelving • Installing new entryway door • Replacing tile in entryway • Moving elevated office to ground level —per ADA recommendations (Not in 2013 CIP Estimate) • Remodeling bathroom to meet ADA requirements (Not in 2013 CIP Estimate) • Updating front checkout area • Other misc. items Bossardt Corporation was hired August 19, 2014 as the construction manager for the scheduled remodeling . project of the 50th Street Liquor Store. Bids were solicited for the project beginning August 25, 2014. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The remodel was originally part of the 2013 CIP but was put on hold due to possible developments and improvements in the 50th & France area. The original budget for this project was $150,000. The bids were reviewed by Bossardt, with the proposed remodeling cost coming in at $311,000. The increase in cost is partly due to some of the recommended materials; resilient flooring and brick around the wine display wall. The resilient flooring is more expensive than carpet by about $3.00 a square foot but will last twice as long. Over $1,200 annual savings will be realized by eliminating the carpet cleaning expense. The LED lighting ($16,000) will also save on energy costs over the next ten year. Another difference is due to relocating the office and enlarging the bathroom to be in ADA compliance. Bossardt also believes a portion of the cost increase may be attributed to increased competition for contractors. Staff plans on closing the store for about one month starting September 22, 2014 and opening approximately October 20, 2014. Based on previous liquor stores closures, staff estimates no more than a five percent loss in sales. The plans for a new "grand opening" during the holiday season, should put the 50th Street Store in a good position to gain back a portion of the.sales lost during the closure. Attachment: Tabulation of bids Proposal Tab EDINA LIQUOR REMODEL Bid Tabulation - 9/5/14 - Proposals Due Contract # - Description Contractor Name Base Bid Contract #420 Masonry /Stone Axel H. Ohman Concrete & Masonry $35,000 Weise Masonry, Inc. $34,480 "Didn't have center column & North wall figured. Contract #610 Demolition/Carpentry Kellington Construction, Inc. $22,800 Tekton Construction Company $28,909 Geor a F. Cook Construction'Co. $48,800 Contract #840 Aluminum Entrances /Storefronts Stanley Access Technologies $6,850 Contract #920 Drywall/Plaster RTL Construction, Inc. $22,595 Ouality Drywall Midwest $26,685 Contract #930 Tile Always Tile & Stone LLC. $4,250 Grazzini Brothers & Company $5,295 Blackhawk Tile & Stone, Inc. $7,916 Contract #950 Acoustical Ceilings Twin City Acoustics, Inc. $5,845 Acoustics Associates $6,200 Minnesota Acoustics, Inc. $6,685 Kirk Acoustics, Inc. $6,985 Contract #965 Resilient Flooring Grazzini�Brothers & Company $24,875 Commercial Flooring Services $27,270 Sonus Interiors, Inc. $27,365 Mars Carpet Sale $27,441 Contract #990 Painting Great Northern Painting $1,650 Henkemeyer Coatings $3,050 Steinbrecher Painting, Inc. $4,871 Contract #1230 Casework/Millwork Janish Wood Products $34,042 "Cannot supply the required bonds Stan Morgan & Associates $25,537 "Casework supply & installation + millwork installation Aaron Carlson $45,462 Page 1 Proposal Tab REM Millwork $11,998 "Supply millwork only Contract #2100 Fire Protection Summit Fire Protection $3,240 Olsen Fire Protection, Inc. $4,693 Service Fire Protection, Ind. $4,728 Contract #2200 Plumbing Excel Mechanical $2,529 N/A - Will use combined HVAC & Plumbing Bid Wenzel Plumbing & Heating $5,147 Contract #2300 HVAC /Controls N/A N/A Contract #2600 Electrical AGI Electric, LLC $35,752 BC Electrical Service LLC $36,500 Phasor Electric Company $39,250 Gunnar Electric, Inc. $43,400 Bloomington Electric Company $44,900 Combined Bids Yale Mechanical $10,600 — Combined HVAC #2300 & Plumbing #2200 Bid Page 2 o.�v EDINA LIQUOR STORE REMODEL BOSSARD CO oKA.,. ON 9/11/2014 14:416 Prqlessionct7 Construction .Services BUDGET vs BID A Wenck Company 2480 SF REMODEL PRE -AWARD COMPLETED CONTRACT # CONTRACT DESCRIPTION APPARENT LOW BIDDER ESTIMATED COSTS BASE BID ''VARIANCE ESTIMATE vs. BID C. Support/Reimbursables $1,600 $1,600 Arch Fees/Reimbursables $30,000 nek = over. 420 MASONRY /STONE AXEL H. OHMAN CONC. & MASONRY $ 31,623 $ 35,000 $3,377 610 DEMOLITION /CARPENTRY KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 23,496 $ 22,800 $696 840 ALUMINUM ENTRANCES /STOREFRONTS STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES $ 5,150 $ 7,150 $2,000 920 DRYWALL/PLASTER RTL CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ . 15,807 $ 22,320 $6,513 930 TILE ALWAYS TILE & STONE LLC $ 3,968 $ 4,250 $282 950 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS, INC. $ 5,632 , $ 5,845 $213 965 RESILIENT FLOORING GRAZZINI BROTHERS COMPANY $ 19,288. $ 24,875 $5,587 990 PAINTING GREAT NORTHERN PAINTING $ 2,169 $ 1,650 _ 3519 1230 CASEWORKIMILLWORK INSTALLATION STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES $ __- 30,100 $ 25,537 $49563 1230 MILLWORK -SUPPLY REM MILLWORK $ - $ 12,212 $12,212 2100 FIRE PROTECTION SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION $ 2,500 $ 3;240 $740 2200 PLUMBING YALE MECHANICAL $ 6,000 $ - $6,000 2300 HVAC /CONTROLS YALE MECHANICAL $ 14,000 $ 10,600 $3,400 , 2600 ELECTRICAL AGI ELECTRICAL, LLC $ 42,000 $ 35,752 $6,248 , SUBTOTALS $ 201,733 $ 211,230 ($9,497) Contingency $10,000 $10,000 CM Fee /Supervision $29,140 $29,140 C. Support/Reimbursables $1,600 $1,600 Arch Fees/Reimbursables $30,000 $30,000 Demo Permit $0 $440 Building Permit $0 $2,200 EST Insurance $1,000 $1,000 Hazmat Survey, $1,110 $1,110 FF &E Budget $0 $25,000 Total Project Budget $ 274,583 $ 311,720 EST ACTUAL C:\ Users\sgrausam \AppData\Local\Microsofl \Windows \Temporary Intemet Files \Content.Outlook \GGIKIIEH\BUD V BID TAB (3).x1s • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: Edina City Council From: Joe Abood Braemar Golf Course General Manager Date: September 16, 2014 Agenda Item M. IV.G. The Recommended Bid is N Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Consulting Services, Braemar Master Plan and Stormwater and Natural Resources Plan Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 22, 2014 Company: Richard Mandell Golf Architecture Barr Engineering Recommended Quote or Bid: Richard Mandell Golf Architecture Master Plan $45,000 Tree Management Report $8,000 (Optional) Total $53,000 — Memorial Fund Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: Master Plan $45,000 Tree Management Report $8,000 (Optional) Stormwater and Natural Resources Plan J Bar Engineering — Stormwater and Natural Resources Plan Total not to exceed $42,000 — Stormwater Utility Fund General Information: Braemar Golf Course Master Plan The first step in this process was to select a five member Master Plan Task Force using an application and interview process. Two additional members were appointed by the Park Board. At the June 17, 2014 City Council meeting the Council ratified the selection of the Braemar Master Plan Task Force appointments: Brenda McCormick (Park Board), David Deeds (Park Board), Rick Ites, Pacy Erck, Joseph Hulbert, Dick Brozic and Paul Presthus. The task force has been meeting on, a weekly basis since July 2014. Rick Ites was selected as the chairperson to lead the Master Plan Task Force through the process. On July 28, 2014 the Request for Proposal for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan was advertised. On August 22, 2014 twenty-eight (28) consultants from all over the country submitted proposals in response to the Braemar Master Plan RFP. Of the 28, five were selected by staff to interview and be evaluated by the Master Plan Task Force. Interviews were conducted September 8 — 10, 2014. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER After careful consideration, the Master Plan Task Force would like to recommend Richard Mandell Golf Architecture to provide consulting services for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan including a tree management plan. Mandell's firm was unanimously chosen by the task force due to his particular understanding of the project, substantial municipal experience, quality of his team and his overall project approach. Richard Mandell Golf Architecture has completed 35 renovation projects since 1992, of which a considerable number were municipal facilities. Most recently, Mandell completed a three year renovation of the historic Keller Golf Course in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Braemar Golf Course Stormwater and Natural Resources Plan At the City Council meeting on April 22, 2014 Council approved staff recommendation to plan stormwater in tandem with the Braemar Golf Course master planning process, due to the significant impact of floodplain and wetlands on the course, and the rules of the'Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Attached is a proposed scope of services from Barr Engineering meant to augment the golf planning process and produce an integrated Stormwater and Natural Resource plan for Braemar Golf Course. Attachment: Barr Engineering Stormwater and Natural Resource Plan City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 resourceful. naturally. BARB engineering.and environmental consultants July 10, 2014 Mr. Ross Bintner Environmental Engineer City of Edina Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re Agreement for Flood Protection, Water Quality, and Natural Resources Management Support for Braemar Golf Course Master Planning Dear Mr. Bintner: Thank you for retaining us to provide technical support -and natural resource management recommendations for the Braemar Golf Course master planning process. We will do our best to justify your expression of confidence in us. It is our understanding that a golf course architectural planning firm will be retained by the City to lead a Task Force for development of a golf course master plan. Barr will provide support to the Task Force related to flood protection, water quality and natural resources management considerations throughout the master planning process. Barr's Project Objectives: • Assist Master Planning task Force in identifying and understanding golf course redesign constraints related to floodplain management, wetland protection, and stormwater management. • Assist Master Planning Task Force in understanding existing and potential natural resource and wildlife habitat assets and exploring ways to integrate with golf course redesign • Provide recommendations to City and Master Planning Task Force for active management of wetland buffers and other natural areas within golf course • Provide recommendations to City and Master Planning Task Force for stormwater management within golf course Task 1. Summary of Floodplain Management, Wetland Protection, and Stormwater Management Design Constraints Subtask 1a. Prepare Floodplain Management Summary Barr will prepare a GIS figure showing the Nine Mile Creek 100 -year floodplain (preliminary) and provide supporting text describing the relevant Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) rules and requirements for filling within the floodplain. Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Subtask lb. Prepare Wetland Protection Summary The NMCWD wetland buffer requirements vary depending on the wetland classification (high, medium, or low value). This scope of work is based on the assumption that wetland delineations, type determinations, and function and values assessments will be completed by another firm prior to completion of this task, and the information on wetland delineation and classification will be provided to Barr in electronic formation (GIS or CAD). Barr will prepare a GIS figure that shows the delineated wetland boundaries within the Braemar Golf Course and identifies the wetland classification as related to the NMCWD wetland management. rules (high, medium, or low value). Barr will also prepare a GIS figure that depicts average wetland buffer width requirements based on the determined wetland classifications. Barr will also provide supporting text describing the relevant NMCWD rules and requirements for wetlands management. Subtask 1 c. Prepare Stormwater Management Summary Barr will prepare a summary of the NMCWD stormwater management rules and requirements as they pertain to redesign of the golf course. Subtask Id. Prepare Presentation for Task Force Meeting Barr`will prepare .a presentation for the Master Planning Team and Task Force summarizing floodplain management, wetland management and stormwater management design constraints. Deliverables: • Floodplain GIS figure and supporting text • Wetlands GIS figure and supporting text • Written. summary of stormwater management requirements • Power Point presentation regarding floodplain, wetlands, and stormwater management design constraints Task 2. Assessment of Existing Natural Areas Subtask 2a. Conduct Site Visit with City Staff Barr staff will conduct a site visit with City of Edina staff to identify natural resource assets within the golf course, including identification of natural areas, core habitats areas (woodlands or wetlands, for example), the main native plant types within these areas, and any special concerns such as endangered species. Subtask 2b. Review of Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program Certification The Braemar Golf Course received Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program (ACSP) certification in 2004. Barr will review the certification submittals and /or other available information related to implementation of the cooperative program. Subtask 2c. Prepare Natural Resource and Habitat Maps Barr will prepare a GIS figure that identifies natural areas throughout the golf course based on available GIS data, ACSP certification information, aerial imagery, and observations from the site visit. The figure will also identify core habitat areas and the primary native plants in the natural areas. Subtask 2d. Prepare presentation for Task Force Meeting Barr will prepare a presentation for the Master Planning Team and Task Force summarizing the assessment of existing natural areas and recommendations for natural resource and wildlife habitat improvements for consideration during the master planning process. Deliverables: Natural Areas GIS figure PowerPoint presentation regarding assessment of existing natural areas and recommendations for natural resource and wildlife habitat improvements Task 3. Meetings Subtask 3a. Attend Project Kick -off Meeting with City Staff and Master Plan Consultant Two Barr staff will attend a project kick -off meeting with City staff and the golf course architectural firm selected to develop the Master Plan. The kick -off meeting will include discussion of the Master Plan development objectives, project schedule, Task Force meeting schedule, and communication protocol between the City, Barr, and the Master Plan consultant. This scope of work assumes that the kick -off meeting will not be coordinated by Barr. Subtask 3b. Participate in Master Plan Task Force Meetings One Barr staff will attend up to six Master Plan Task Force meetings to provide input on flood protection, water quality and natural resources management considerations and ideas on integrating natural resource assets into the golf course redesign. This scope of work assumes up to 6 hours of time for preparation or follow -up for each Task Force meeting to review information /work products provided by the Master Plan consultant and other meeting preparation or follow -up, as necessary. This scope of work assumes that the Task Force meetings will not be coordinated by Barr. Task 4. Natural Resources Management Recommendations Subtask 4a. Prepare summary of natural resources management recommendations Barr will prepare a written summary of natural resource management recommendations for inclusion in the Master Plan, including the following: • Water quality treatment recommendations • Wetland buffer management recommendations • Forest and /or natural area vegetation management recommendations • Wildlife and Habitat improvement recommendations • Natural resource protection education and awareness recommendations The summary will be provided to Engineering and Parks and Recreation staff for review and comment. Subtask 4b. Seek City staff input and revise management recommendation summary Barr will meet with staff from the Engineering and Parks and Recreation departments to discuss the natural resources management recommendations and City comments on the draft summary document. Barr will revise the management recommendations summary per City comments. Page 4 Subtask 4c.Review and Comment on Master Plan Barr will review the draft Master Plan provided by the Master Plan consultant and prepare and submit comments to City staff (Engineering and Parks and Recreation departments) and the Master Plan consultant. Deliverables: • Draft written summary of natural resources management recommendations • Revised summary of natural resources management recommendations • Comments on Master Plan Task S. Project Management Includes project coordination with City staff and internal Barr team, management of project schedule and budget, and progress reporting. Deliverables: • Project progress reports Barr will complete the proposed scope of work in accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. Project fees will be billed on a time and expense basis, not to exceed the total(of $42,000 without prior approval from authorized City of Edina staff. We appreciate the opportunity to continue providing engineering services to the City of Edina and look forward to working with you on this project. If the proposed scope of services and fees are satisfactory, please sign a copy of this letter in the space provided, and return it to us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, BARR ENGINEERING CO. By Janna M. Kieffer Its Vice President Accepted this _ day of 20_ CITY OF EDINA By �.tc „A,. 11 -. �.y -_ �u.,a .•r ,i, ,..:., !: -si �...r •_Fh 71:1p,d�n Project Name: Flood Protection, Water Quality, and Natural Resources Management Support for Braemar Golf Course Master Planning Client Name: City of Edina BARR Date: July 10, 2014 Estimated Project Costs by Subtask Total Hours Project Total Task 1 Summary of floodplain management, wetland protection, and stormwater management design.constraints Subtask 1a. Prepare floodplain management summary 26 $ 2,640.00 Subtask 1b. Prepare wetland summary 32 $ 3,290.00 Subtask 1c. Prepare stormwater management summary 6 $ 840.00 Subtask 1d. Prepare presentation or Task Force meeting 6 $ 840.00 Subtotal 70 $ 7,610.00 Task 2 Assesment of Existing Natural Areas Subtask 2a. Conduct site visit with City staff 25 $ 2,165.00 Subtask 2b. Review of Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. Program Certification 8 $ 845.00 Subtask 2c. Prepare natural resources and habitat maps 55 $ 4,665.00 Subtask 2d. Prepare presentation for Task Force meeting 10 $ 1,140.00 Subtotal 98 $ 8,815.00 Task 3 Meetings Subtask 3a. Attend project kick - off meeting with City staff and Master Plan consultant 8 $ 1,140.00 Subtask 3b. Participate in Master Plan Task Force meetings 60 $ 8,550.00 Subtotal 68 $ 9,690.00 Job 4 Natural Resources Management Recommendations Subtask 4a. Prepare summary of natural resources management recommendations 87 $ 9,025.00 Subtask 4b. Seek city staff input and revise management recommendation summary 24 ; $ 2,900.00 Subtask 4c. Review and comment on Master Plan 18 $ 2,560.00 Subtotal 129 $ 14,485.00 Job 5 Project Management Project administration and management 10 $ 1,400.00 Subtotal 10. $ 1,400.00 Project Total 365 $ 42,000.00 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: September 16, 2014 oe- 0) Jess Agenda Item #: IV. H. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 14 -17NB — 2014 Watermain Repair Patching Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: September 5, 2014 Company: Park Construction Company Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Park Construction General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: November 5, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $73,746.20 $85,664.00 $86,336.25 $73,746.20 In order to preserve the lifespan and aesthetics of the street pavements, utility excavations occurring within 5 -years of a street reconstruction project are required to replace the pavement from the curb line to curb line and from saw cut line to saw cut line. This is approximately a 30 -ft by 30 -ft patch. This requirement is applicable to utility excavations of both internal staff as well as private utility companies. Since 2013, there have been 21 public watermain repairs on streets reconstructed within the past 5- years. Staff recently solicited quotations for these repairs. 3 quotes were submitted with Park Construction being the low. Park Construction is currently working on Olinger Boulevard Project and is familiar with our construction requirements. Funding for this project is from the water utility fund. Staff recommends awarding the project to Park Construction, Inc. GAFMCENTRAL SVCSXENG DMPROJECTMONTRACTMOMENG 14 -17NB 2014 WM Patches\QuoteskItem IV. H. ENG 14 -17NB RFP.doct City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN SS424 w91N�,1� o le • rtrox��° • lees To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. I. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Request for Purchase — Engineering Services For Lift Station No. 6 Rehabilitation Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached engineering services proposal for Lift Station No. 6 Rehabilitation. Information / Background: Edina Sanitary Sewer Lift Station #6 is located in Cornelia Park near the intersection of West 72nd Street and Oaklawn Avenue. Lift Station #6 pumps sanitary sewage from approximately 50% of Edina's land area, from the south and west half of the city. The pumps lift the sewage to a gravity sewer located at West 72nd Street and Cornelia Lane. Lift Station #6 was originally constructed in 1965 and is experiencing significant deterioration of the concrete inflow channel and flow- monitoring flume. The engineering services proposal offers to determine the best method to repair the deteriorating concrete, design and specify flow- monitoring equipment, replace the existing non - functioning equipment, prepare bidding documents, provide construction oversight and prepare asbuilt drawing of the improvements. The total cost of the professional services is $35,000 and will be funded from the sanitary utility fund. Attachment: BARR Engineering Co. Proposal G: \PW \CENTRAL SVGS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \LS46 LS #6 Rehab \DESIGN \Contract \Item IVA. LS #6 Professional Services.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 resourceful. naturally. BAR engineering and environmental consultants August 26, 2014 Mr. Patrick Wrase City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Lift Station #6 Improvements Dear Mr. Wrase, Thank you for requesting this proposal from Barr Engineering Co. for plans and specifications for improvements to Edina lift station #6. This proposal describes the engineering services to be provided by Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) to the City of Edina (City) for design of repairs to the concrete influent channel and addition of flow monitoring equipment, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction observation and inspection. This proposal will consist of the following sections: Barr's Understanding of the Project, City's Role, Project Team, Proposed Project Schedule, and finally a cost estimate of Barr's fees. Barr's Understanding of the Project This proposal is based on discussions between the City and Barr Engineering held at a meeting at Edina Public Works June 13'h, 2014. The main goal of this project is to repair the deteriorating concrete and replace the existing parshall flume with flow meters on the pump discharge piping. Lift Station #6 is located in Cornelia Park near the intersection of W 72 °a Street and Oaklawn Ave. The lift station consists of 6 dry -pit submersible pumps and receives approximately 2/3 of the City's sanitary sewer flow, with discharge rates ranging between 100 -3,200 gpm. Recently the City has noted deteriorating concrete in the influent areas of the lift station, in particular the parshall flume and concrete flow splitter. Barr completed a preliminary inspection of the lift station on May 13`h, 2014, and found that the concrete deterioration was primarily surficial and limited to the first 1- 2- inches of concrete. The inspection was limited to surfaces that could be inspected from the open areas of the lift station and no inspection was completed on surfaces below.the sanitary sewer flow line. Results of the inspection are shown in Figure 1. Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 wwiv.barccom Mr. Patrick Wrose August 26, 2014 Pane 2 The project will be broken into four main tasks: 1. Preparation of a design memorandum to document the planned methods of repairs to the concrete and summarize historical sanitary sewer flow to the lift station. 2. Design of lift station improvements, including plans, specifications, and bidding services. 3. Construction Oversight. 4. Preparation of as -built drawings. Work Plan Task 1— Design Memorandum A design memorandum will be completed to document the recommended concrete repairs and anticipated by -pass pumping that will be required. Barr will research the methods and materials available to select a repair option that reduces lift station downtime and increases life of the repairs. Barr will involve the City in the repair option selection to ensure the project meets the City's expectations. Barr will also review historic pump runtime, MCES meter data, historic City sanitary flow metering, and other available data to estimate the flows to Lift Station 6 so a conservative by -pass pumping flowrate can be estimated for use by the Contractor completing the repairs. Task 2 — Design of Lift Station #6 Improvements The design of the lift station improvements will occur as two separate project bids. The first will focus on the structural repairs in the "wet" part of the lift station. The second will focus on the SCADA changes needed to incorporate the new flow meters into the control system. For the concrete repairs Barr will perform design and engineering services needed to prepare bidding documents for the lift station repairs in wet part of the station. The documents will be similar to those prepared for the previous lift station project and will consist of specifications and drawings necessary to depict the required work to prospective bidders. As in past projects, Barr will assist the City with bidding services and meet with City staff as needed to obtain input for the design process. In addition, Barr will prepare a second set of documents related to the SCADA modifications. We will review the SCADA modifications required to accommodate the new flowmeters. These changes are likely to be software oriented. We will work with the City to determine if you would like these changes to be performed by the original SCADA hardware software vendor to avoid warranty issues or if you would like to open up the SCADA process to other integrators. The deliverable for this work would then be a request for a quote to make the appropriate changes sent to the original vendor of the equipment or to a larger list of integrators if the City so chooses. Note that this deliverable is separate from the other bid for the concrete repairs. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271331 Sanitary Sewer Model Recalibr\WorkFiles\LS6 Investigation\ProposalEift Station #6 proposal.docx Mr. Patrick Wrase August 26, 2014 Page 3 Task 3 — Construction Oversight ' Barr plans to be onsite during the work to further inspect the lift station once the flow has been diverted. Barr will then work with the City to direct the contractor to make any additional repairs to areas that had been below the flow line. Barr will also perform construction such as partial and final pay estimates, change orders, and general on -site construction observation. Less actual construction oversight. will be needed for the SCADA portion of the project. For that work we will primarily be reviewing shop drawings to ensure that the system will function with the current software. Task 4 — Preparation of As -built Drawings At the completion of the work Barr will update the construction drawings based on the actual work completed and provide the City with an as -built drawing set documenting the work that was completed. City of Edina's Role This proposal is based on the understanding that the City of Edina will provide information as needed to assist in this project. Barr specifically requests that the City provide the following items: 1. Information on existing pumps, including model information, run times, and operational logic. This project is also based on the understanding that the City will be in charge of the administration of the bidding process. Project Team For this project, we have assembled a team of engineers and technicians who have extensive experience with the City of Edina. Our team includes: overall project quality control will be maintained by Brian LeMon, Project Manager will be Dan Nesler, structural engineering will be completed by Brian Tri, and electrical engineering will be completed by Stuart Stephens. Proposed Project Schedule Barr proposes to begin work September 2ad, or as soon as we are notified that this proposal is acceptable to the City. We assume all data will be received by September 15`h and analyzed by September 22nd. Barr proposed to complete the plans and specifications by October 14`h. Bid opening is anticipated bid to occur in late October with construction in either November or December. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271331 Sanitary Sewer Model Recalibr \WorkFiles\LS6 Investigation\Proposal\Lift Station #6 proposal.docx Mr. Patrlck Wrase August 26, 2014 Page 4 Cost Proposal Barr will perform the services listed in this proposal for an estimated cost of $35,000. Note that construction services are included but can vary dramatically based on what is encountered during construction. If you have any questions or require additional information please contact us. We look forward to working with the City on this project. Sincerely, el- C4--� Brian LeMon, P.E. Vice President Accepted this _ day of , 201_ CITY OF EDINA a Its P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271331 Sanitary Sewer Model Recalibr \WorkFiles\LS6 Investigation\Proposal\Lift Station #6 proposal.docx 4V1 O �+ U31 CID v � �y r • ��'coRroR/+':�� • i lees To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL„ Agenda Item #: IV. J.., From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion 0. Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -98 Authorizing York Avenue Sidewalk Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County r Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -98 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to sign attached cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for the York Avenue Sidewalk. 1! Information/ Background: The cooperative agreement details the responsibilities between the'City of Edina and Hennepin County concerning the construction of sidewalk improvements along the west side of County'State Aid, Highway No (CSAH) 31 (York Avenue) from 69th Street to CSAH 53 (66th Street) in 201.4. Please recall that this project is partially funded with a grant from Hennepin County. Staff recommends the City Council approve this resolution. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -98 Cooperative Agreement G:U WICENTRAL SVCSIENG 131WROJECTSICONTRACTS120141ENG 14-162014 Sidewalk ImprIADMINIMISQItem IV. J. Res No. 2014- 98.dooc RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -98 APPROVING CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY YORK AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina and Hennepin County approved sidewalk improvements along the west side of County State Aid Highway No (CSAH) 31 (York Avenue) from 69th Street to CSAH 53(66 th Street) in 2014; and WHEREAS, the City or its agent shall be responsible for administering construction of the Project and have adequate personnel available to perform the construction staking, testing, inspection and development of as -built plans required on the project; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Mayor James B. Hovland and City Manager Scott H. Neal, are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a construction cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for York Avenue Sidewalk Improvement, a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Dated: September 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 , County Project No. 1336 County State Aid Highway No. 31 City of Edina County of Hennepin COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of 520 by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", and the City of Edina, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City is proposing to construct a new sidewalk along the west side of County State Aid Highway No. (CSAH) 31 (York Avenue) from 69h Street to CSAH 53 (0, Street), as shown on the plans the City Project Number (County Project Number 1336), hereinafter referred to as the '`Project "; and WHEREAS, the above described Project lies within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City or its agents shall be responsible to develop the plans and specifications for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has requested that the County approve said plans and specifications, and the County has indicated its willingness to approve said plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, the City or its agents shall be responsible for administering construction of the Project and has adequate personnel available to perform the construction staking, testing, inspection and development of as-built plans required on the Project; and WHEREAS, the County will participate in its share of the costs to construct the sidewalk along CSAH 31 as set forth herein; and - WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 CSAH 31, C.P. 1336 The City or its agents shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications, and proposal; obtain approval of said plans and specifications from the County; advertise for bids for the work and construction; receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement; enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder; administer the contract; and, perform the required engineering and inspection; all in accordance with said plans and specifications. The contract shall include. the plans and specifications prepared by the City or its agents and approved by the County. Said plans and specifications shall conform to Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Design Standards applicable to County State Aid Highways and to the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). Attached is a copy of the Mn/DOT ADA Compliance Checklist (Curb Ramp) form. The City or its agents shall complete said form for each curb ramp constructed as part of the Project and return to the County. The City understands and agrees that payment will not be made by the County until all required ADA certification forms have been received and verified by the County. H Prior to beginning construction, the City shall Punish the County with two (2) complete sets of County approved plans and specifications for said Project. Upon completion of the Project, the City or its agents shall furnish the County with a complete set of as-built plans certified as to their accuracy by the City's Project Engineer. Said as- designed plans, specifications and as-built plans for the Project shall be furnished by the City at no cost to the County. I_"I The City or its agents shall administer the construction contract and perform all required engineering, inspection and testing. All construction and materials sampling and testing for the Project shall be accomplished in accordance with all applicable standards and requirements of the Minnesota' Department of Transportation's (Mn/DOT) State Aid for Local Transportation Division in effect at the time of Contract award. The City shall also obtain, and comply with, any and all permits and approvals required from other governmental or regulatory agencies to accomplish the Project. Said permits and approvals shall be obtained prior to the start of any construction and made available to the County upon request. It is understood and agreed by the City that construction of the Project shall be completed to the satisfaction of the County within three years of the date this agreement has been signed by the parties hereto. - 2 - \JIJI-- Agreement No: PW 50- 11'-13 CSAH- 31, C.P. 1336 IV The construction of this Project shall be under the supervision and direction of the City-Engineer or designated representative. All work for the Project shall be completed in compliance with the County approved plans and specifications. The County Engineer and representative staff shall have the right, as, the work progresses, to enter upon the premises to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the City Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary., .The County agrees that the City may make changes in the above referenced approved plans or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the, County that the City may enter into any'change orders or supplemental agreements with the City's contractor. for the performance of any additional construction or, construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project. The City shall obtain the approval of the County Engineer or designated representative on said change orders or supplemental agreements. The County will respond to the City's request for approvals within seven (7) calendar days. V The City or its agents shall acquire all additional right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Project, at no cost to the County. Upon completion of this Project, all permanent right of way acquired for CSAH 31 as provided herein shall be conveyed to the County by the City with no consideration required. VI The County «rill participate in the construction costs for the sidewalk as provided herein. Upon completion of the Project (anticipated in 2,014) the City shall: notify the County and submit an invoice for one hundred percent (100 %) of the County's share of the costs for the Project. Upon approval of the completed Project by the County Highway Engineer or designated representative, the County shall reimburse the City the lump sum amount of Twenty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and'No Cents ($27,750.00) as its share of the costs for the Project.' The City understands and agrees that the County's total cost participation for the Project shall not exceed Twenty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($27,750.00) without an amendment to this Agreement. The City shall ,submit invoices to Mr. Robert Byers, Senior Professional Engineer or his successor at the Hennepin County Transportation Department, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN, 55340 -5421. - 3 - _�J` Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 CSAH 31, C.P. 1336 VIII It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that upon completion of the Project, the sidewalk included in the Project shall be maintained by the City and all maintenance, restoration or repair required thereafter shall be performed by the City at no expense to the County. IX All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. X Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by the law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The County's and the City's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self - insurance program. k" The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including, reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and /or anvone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The City's. liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. The County agrees to defend, indemnfy, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the County, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, .repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The County's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. -4- �-N �,— Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 CSAH 31, C.P. 1336 EMl The City also agrees that any contract let by the City or its agents for the performance of the work on County State Aid Highway No. 31 as provided herein shall include clauses that will: 1) . Require the Contractor to defend, indemnify, and hold the County, its officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or by reason of the acts and/or omissions of the said Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) Require the Contractor to be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement; and 3) Require the Contractor to provide and maintain insurance in accordance with the following; 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Property Damage (XCU) Liability coverages: Limits General Aggregate $2,000,000 Products -- Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $1,500,000 Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,500,000 Hennepin County shall be named as an additional insured for the Commercial General Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under this Agreement. 2. Automobile Liability: Combined Single limit each occurrence coverage or the equivalent covering owned, non - owned., and hired automobiles: $1,000,000 3. Workers' Compensation. and Employer's Liability: A. Workers' Compensation Statutory If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverages must apply to Minnesota .laws. B. Employer's Liability - Bodily injury by: Accident - Each Accident $500,000 Disease - Policy Limit $500,000 Disease - Each Employee $500,000 - 5 - W`-- Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 CSAH 31, C.P. 1336 4. Professional Liability – Per Claim $1,500,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 It understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the above listed Professional Liability insurance will not be required in any construction contract let by City if the City's Contractor is not required to perform design engineering as part of said construction contract. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the City's Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with said Project. All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of policies shall be submitted to the County upon written request. Xin It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered 'herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. X1V In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated -6- U1�1— Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 CSAH 31,. C.P. 1336 representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the County and the City. In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County, so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the City Engineer or designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as liaison between the City and the County. xv It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement. between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements -and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications; or waivers of provisions of this. Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. XVI The whereas clauses,are incorporated herein and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. XVII The,provisions of Minnesota Statutes 18159 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights' and discrimination and the .Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered apart of this Agreement as though .fully set forth herein. (this space left intentionally blank) -7- W� Agreement No. PW 50 -11 -13 CSAH 31, C.P. 1336 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) ATTEST: By: Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �Int County Attorney Date: CITY OF EDINA By: Mayor Date: And: Manager Date: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Bv: Assistant County Attorney Bv: Chair of its County Board Date: And: County Administrator Date: And: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: Director, Transportation Department and County Highway Engineer Date: Date: -8- W`— MnDOT ADA Compliance Checklist Curb Ramp) SP: City: District: 71 ::..., tersec drant Q a u n tamp Type Const. Year: .ompile all relevant document (photos, notes, etc) of the completed quadrant and send to kDAComplianceChecklists .dot @state.mn.us (1) Minimum 4' wide pedestrian access route (PAR) maintained? o Yes 0 No (2) Landing meets min. 4'x4' and perpendicular grade break(s)? 0 Yes Q No (3) Are landing(s) located at the top of each ramp and at change(s) in direction and at inverse grades? Yes Q No (4) Landing slopes ( %): (TH) (TH) (5) Ramp's running slope ( %): TH TH (SS) (SS) SS SS Initial Secondary (6) Ramp's cross slope ( %): 177777771 TH TH Initial Secondary [ SS SS Initial Secondary Initial Secondary (7) Gutter flow line slope ( %): TH SS (8) Gutter inslope ( %): TH SS (9) Roadway cross slope ( %): TH SS TH = Trunk Highway SS = Side Street (10) Do truncated domes cover the entire curb opening and are hey properly oriented? Yes 8 No (11) Are gutter line and ramps draining properly? O Yes () No (12) Are there any vertical discontinuities greater than 1/4 "? Yes 0 No (13) Do ramps comply with Spec'521.3? Yes No 14) Are ramps fully compliant? OYes 0 No f NO, check the reason(s) below. Explain why the ramp didn't meet compliance and how he ramp has been improved from the pre- construction condition (see ADA Compliance : hecklist Guidance for more info and attach pages if needed). Topography [Structure(s) []Utilities OContractor ri Mn DOT (15) Was the curb ramp able to be built according to the plan details? 0 Yes ® No If NO, please explain: Printed Name: Date (mm /dd /yyyy): ❑I certify that the information entered on this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I fully Lnderstand the checklist standards and am qualified to carry out the insnection. OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE k_),� To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL OO @ 07 � �MCORBPeOSB p`��0 • Agenda Item #: IV. K. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -99 Authorizing Vernon Avenue Sidewalk Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -99 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to sign attached cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for the Vernon Avenue Sidewalk. Information / Background: The cooperative agreement details the responsibilities between the City of Edina and Hennepin County concerning the construction of sidewalk improvements along the north side of County State Aid Highway No (CSAH) 158 (Vernon Avenue) from Doncaster Way to Ayrshire Boulevard in 2014. Please recall that this project is partially funded with a grant from Hennepin County. Staff recommends the City Council approve this resolution. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -99 Cooperative Agreement G:IPWICENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTS\CONTRACTSUOMENG 14-16 2014 Sidewalk ImprIADMINIMISCIkem IV. K Res No. 2014- 99.dooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -99 APPROVING CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY VERNON AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina and Hennepin County approved sidewalk improvements along the north side of County State Aid Highway No (CSAH) 158 (Vernon Avenue) from Doncaster Way to Ayrshire Boulevard in 2014; and WHEREAS, the City or its agent shall be responsible for administering construction of the Project and have adequate personnel available to perform the construction staking, testing, inspection and development of as -built plans required on the project; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Mayor James B. Hovland and City Manager Scott H. Neal, are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a construction cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for Vernon Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Dated: September 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov - 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Agreement No. PW 51 -11 -13 County Project No. 1337 County State Aid Highway No. 158 City of Edina County of Hennepin COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of ,20 by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", and the City of Edina, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City is proposing to construct a new sidewalk along the north side of County State Aid Highway No. (CSAH) 158 (Vernon Avenue) from Doncaster Way to Ayrshire Boulevard, as shown on the plans the City Project Number (County Project Number 1337), hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the above described Project lies within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City or its agents shall be responsible to develop the plans and specifications for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has requested that the County approve said plans and specifications, and the County has indicated its willingness to approve said plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, the City or its agents shall be responsible for administering construction of the Project and has adequate personnel available to perform the construction staking, testing, inspection and development of as -built plans required on the Project; and WHEREAS, the County will participate in its share of the costs to construct the sidewalk along CSAH 158 as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: Agreement No. PW 51 -11 -13 CSAH 158, C.P. 1337 The City or its agents shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications, and proposal; obtain approval of said plans and specifications from the County; advertise for bids for the work and construction; receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement; enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder; administer the contract; and, perform the required engineering and inspection; all in accordance with said plans and specifications. The contract shall include the plans and specifications prepared by the City or its agents and approved by the County. Said plans and specifications shall conform to Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Design Standards applicable to County State Aid Highways and to the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). Attached is a copy of the Mn/DOT ADA Compliance Checklist (Curb Ramp) form. The City or its agents shall complete said form for each curb ramp constructed as part of the Project and return to the County. The City understands and agrees that payment will not be made by the County until all required ADA certification forms have been received and verified by the County. II Prior to beginning construction, the City shall furnish the County with two (2) complete sets of County approved plans and specifications for said Project. Upon completion of the Project, the City or its agents shall furnish the County with a complete set of as -built plans certified as to their accuracy by the City's Project Engineer. Said as- designed plans, specifications and as-built plans for the Project shall be furnished by the City at no cost to the County. M The City or its agents shall administer the construction contract and perform all required engineering, inspection and testing. All construction and materials sampling and testing for the Project shall be accomplished in accordance with all applicable standards and requirements of the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (Mn/DOT) State Aid for Local Transportation Division in effect at the time of Contract award. The City shall also obtain, and comply with, any and all permits and approvals required from other governmental or regulatory agencies to accomplish the Project. Said permits and approvals shall be obtained prior to the start of any construction and made available to the County upon request. It is understood and agreed by the City that construction of the Project shall be completed to the satisfaction of the County within three years of the date this agreement has been signed by the parties hereto. -2- VV\_ The construction of this Project shall be under the supervision.and direction of the City. Engineer or designated representative.. All work for the Project shall be completed in compliance with the County approved plans and specifications. The County Engineer and representative staff shall have the right, as the work progresses, to enter upon the premises to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the City Engineer and staff at their request to,the extent necessary. The County agrees,that the City may make changes in the'above referenced approved plans or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreedby the County that the City may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the City's contractor for the performance of any additional construction or constriction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project. The City shall obtain the approval of the County Engineer or designated representative on said change orders or supplemental agreements. The County will respond to the City's request for approvals within -seven (7) calendar days. 0 The City or its agents shall acquire all additional right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Project, -at no cost to the County. Upon completion of this Project, all permanent right of way acquired for CSAH 158 as provided herein shall be conveyed to the County by City with no consideration required. The County will participate in the construction costs for the sidewalk as provided herein. Upon completion of the Project (anticipated in 2015) the,City "shall notify the Cotwy and submit an invoice for one, hundred percent (100 %) of the County's share of the costs for the Project. Upon approval of the completed Project by the County Highway Engineer or designated representative, the County shall reimburse the City the lump stun amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars and.No Cents ($50,000.00) as its share of the costs for the Project. The City understands and agrees that the County's total cost participation for the Project shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($50,000.00) without an amendment to this Agreement. The City shall submit invoices to Mr. Robert Byers, Senior Professional Engineer or his successor at the Hennepin County Transportation Department, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN, 55340 -5421: - 3 - ��- Agreement No. PW 51 -11 -13 CSAH 158, C.P. 1337 VIII It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that upon completion of the Project, the sidewalk included in the Project shall be maintained by the City and all maintenance, restoration or repair. required thereafter shall be performed by the City at no expense to the County. [ ►:1 All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the,Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. X Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by the law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The County's and the City's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self - insurance program. XI The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including, reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, .restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The City's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. The County agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages; losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the County, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The County's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. -4- vs - XiI The City also agrees that any contract let by the City or its agents for the: performance of the work on County State Aid Highway No. 158 as provided herein shall include clauses that will: 1) Require the Contractor to defend, indemnify; and hold the County, its officials, officers, agents:and employees harmless from any liability, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or byxeason of the acts and/or omissions of the said Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) Require the Contractor to be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the 'work provided: for in this Agreement; and 3) Require the Contractor to provide and maintain insurance in accordance with the following: 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence.basis with Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Property Damage (XCU) Liability coverages: Limits General Aggregate $2;000,000 Products -- Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury' $1,500,000 Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury. and Property Damage $1,500,000 Hennepin County shall be named as an additional insured for the Commercial General 'Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under. this Agreement. 2. Automobile Liability:, Combined Single limit each occurrence coverage or the :equivalent covering owned, non - owned, and hired automobiles: $1,000,000 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: A. Workers' Compensation If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverages must apply to Minnesota laws. B. Employer's Liability - Bodily injury by: Accident - Each Accident Disease - Policy Limit Disease - Each Employee, -5- Statutory $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 W �. 4. Professional Liability — Per Claim Aggregate Agreement No. PW 51 -11 -13 CSAH 158, C.P. 1337 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 It understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the above listed Professional Liability insurance will not be required in any construction contract let by City if the City's Contractor is not required to perform design engineering as part of said construction contract. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the City's Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with said Project. All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of policies shall be submitted to the County upon written request. XIII It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. *4. &L In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated -6- \N'.- Agreement No. PW 51 -11 -13 CSAH 158, C.P. 1337 representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the County and the City. In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County so as to accomplish the purposes of this,Agreement, the City Engineer or designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as liaison between the City and the County. XV It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the'p' ies is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are t. deemed to`.be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. XVI The whereas clauses are incorporated herein and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. XVII The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered, a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. (this space left intentionally blank) -7- .9` - Agreement No. PW 51 -11 -13 CSAH 158, C.P. 1337 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) ATTEST: By: Deputy /Clerk of the County Board Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: - Assihad County Attorney Date:_ CITY OF EDINA By: Mayor And: Manager Date: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: By: _ Assistant County Attorney By: Chair of its County Board Date: And: - County Administrator Date: And: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By:_ - - -- Director, Transportation Department and County Highway Engineer Date: -8- \/V`— (P MnDOT ADA Compliance Checklist (Curb Ramp) SP: at change(s) in direction and at inverse grades? City: �.y4'•- .. - °:r. District: ��•���;_�s (TH) (5) Ramp's running slope ;_` TH Initial Secondary nter sect' Ion• :• =" TH ad - Q u rant: Secondary tam p Type: Const. Year: pile all relevant document (photos, notes, etc) of the completed quadrant and send to FOE mn.us (1) Minimum 4' wide pedestrian access route (PAR) maintained? (2) Landing meets min. 4'x4' and perpendicular grade break(s)? (3) Are landing(s) located at the top of each ramp and at change(s) in direction and at inverse grades? (4) Landing slopes ( %): (SS) (TH) (TH) (5) Ramp's running slope ;_` TH Initial Secondary (6) Ramp's cross slope ( %): TH :• =" TH Initial Secondary (7) Gutter flow line slope ( %): (8) Gutter inslope ( %): (9) Roadway cross slope ( %): F7777771 177777771 TH SS TH L SS TH SS 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes Q No 0 Yes No (SS) (SS) ss <_ " SS Initial Secondary :ASS SS Initial Secondary' TH = Trunk Highway SS = Side Street (10) Do truncated domes cover the entire curb opening and are :hey properly oriented? Yes No (11) Are gutter line and ramps draining properly? 0 Yes 0 No (12) Are there any vertical discontinuities greater than 1/4 "? Q Yes 0 No (13) Do ramps comply with Spec: 2521.3? Yes 0 No (14) Are ramps fulled compliant? OYes O No NO, check the reason(s) below. Explain why the ramp didn't meet compliance and how le ramp has been improved from the pre - construction condition (see ADA Compliance lecklist Guidance for more info and attach pages if needed), OTopography QStructure(s) [31JItilities OContractor [I MnDOT I tl�l vvas me curb ramp able to be built according to the plan details? ® Yes 0 No If N®, please explain: Printed Name: L Date (mm /dd /yyyy): ❑I certify that the information entered on this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I fully understand the checklist standards and am qualified to carry out the inspection. OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE FORM OFFLINE W__ rw.ffl, / :COMMENDATION Action Requested: Approve first reading of Ordinance No. 2014 -15, amending Chapter 12 of the Edina City Code Concerning Taxicabs and Taxicab Drivers, and waive second reading. Information / Background: Please recall that at its July 1, 2014 meeting, based on an advisory communication from the Edina., Transportation Commission (attached), the City Council directed staff to review and modify Chapter 12 of the Edina` City Code. This code concerns, taxicabs and taxicab drivers. Because this section of Code includes . some outdated references and -may inhibit some providers of transportation services from serving Edina . residents, staff has prepared the attached Ordinance for Council approval. Attachments: Ordinance No: `2014= IS ETC Advisory Communication dated July 1, 2014 asking City Council direct City staff to conduct a thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM1Advisory Communications\2014 \Item IV. L. Ordinance No. 2014 -15 Taxicab.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 o @3 c, y v � - C�RPe -ras Be To:. MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. L. From: Mark. K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Action. Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014 -15 Amending Chapter 12 of the Code Concerning Taxicabs and Taxicab. Drivers Action Requested: Approve first reading of Ordinance No. 2014 -15, amending Chapter 12 of the Edina City Code Concerning Taxicabs and Taxicab Drivers, and waive second reading. Information / Background: Please recall that at its July 1, 2014 meeting, based on an advisory communication from the Edina., Transportation Commission (attached), the City Council directed staff to review and modify Chapter 12 of the Edina` City Code. This code concerns, taxicabs and taxicab drivers. Because this section of Code includes . some outdated references and -may inhibit some providers of transportation services from serving Edina . residents, staff has prepared the attached Ordinance for Council approval. Attachments: Ordinance No: `2014= IS ETC Advisory Communication dated July 1, 2014 asking City Council direct City staff to conduct a thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM1Advisory Communications\2014 \Item IV. L. Ordinance No. 2014 -15 Taxicab.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -IS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE _. EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING TAXICABS AND TAXICAB DRIVERS The City of. Edina ordains: Section 1. Chapter. I2 Article VII of the Edina City Code is amended to read: Sec. 12 -31 S. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the.meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Charitable Non roflt Transportation Vehicle means any vehicle for hire or other public motor vehicle 501(c)(3), United States'Internal Revenue Code, Non - Profit Organizations, whether owned and driven by a volunteer driver or an employee of the non - profit charitable organization who is not directly paid by riders. Street means any street, alley, avenue, court, bridge, lane or public place or highway in the city. Taxicab. >(I) The term "taxicab" means any motor vehicle, as defined in Minn. Stats. § 169.011, having a seating capacity of seven,(7) or fewer persons including the driver and engaged in carrying of persons for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, and whether the motor vehicle is operated from a street stand, or subject to calls from a garage, or otherwise operated for hire. (2) The term "taxicab" does not include limousines, charitable non - profit transportation vehicles, vehicles used for transportation network service, motor vehicles subject to control and regulation by the Metropolitan Council state public s __ ?en, motor vehicles regularly used by morticians in carrying on their business, or motor vehicles hired on an hourly basis. Taxicab driver means any person who drives a taxicab. Transportation network company (TNC) means a person or entity that provides transportation _ network service. Transportation network service means a prearranged transportation service offered or provided for compensation using an internet - enabled application or digital platform to connect potential passengers with transportation network drivers. The term transportation network service does not include a ridesharine arrangement.as that term is defined ..in Minnesota >Statute Chapter 169.011 subd.65. Sec. 12 -316. Vehicle License required. No person shall operate a taxicab within the city without displaying a valid taxicab license decal duly issued by another political subdivision in this state the City of Bleemi^^*^^, the City of, Leuis Park or the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Sec. 12 -317. Driver's license required. No person shall drive a taxicab within the city without possessing a valid taxicab driver's license duly issued by another political subdivision in this state the City of Bleemin ten, City of Richfield-, City e f c, Louis Pa-!- or the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Sec. 12 -318. Designation signs posted and visible on the exterior vehicle. Each taxicab required to be licensed by this article shall bear signs identifying the vehicle as a taxicab. Such signs shall be on the exterior of the vehicle and shall be visible from each side of the vehicle. Sec. 12 -319. Exemption. A Charitable Non - profit Transportation Vehicle is exempt from the regulations set forth in this ordinance upon presentation to the City Clerk documentation establishing the Section 501(c)(31 status of the entity. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest September 16, 2014 None September 25, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor wg1��r� ow e ,, Cn luau To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Item No. IX. B. From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Edina Transportation Commission Date: July 1, 2014 Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Edina Taxicab Code and Transportation Options Attachments: 1. Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII 2. Letter to ETC from Arlene Forrest 3. Requested Amendment to Edina City Code 4. Information about ITNTwinCities Action Requested: City Council direct City staff to conduct a thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code. Situation: A variety of transportation options are needed in the community to ensure that residents of all ages, income levels and abilities can participate in the normal activities of daily living that require transportation without undue inconvenience or prohibitive expense. Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII regulates taxicabs and taxicab drivers that pick up passengers in the city. This section of Code includes outdated references; would appear to regulate transportation services not intended to be regulated by this section of Code; and may inhibit providers of transportation services from serving Edina residents. Background: "Taxicab" Definition Sec. 12- 315(1) of Edina City Code defines "taxicab" as "any motor vehicle, as defined in Minn. Stats. 169.011, engaged in carrying of persons for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, and whether the motor vehicle is operated from a street stand, or subject to calls from a garage, or otherwise operated for hire." In discussion at the June 2014 ETC meeting, it was noted that the broad definition of "taxicab" could apply to a variety of for - profit and non - profit transportation services, including: • Metro Transit buses, Transit Link, and Metro Mobility; • Private and non - profit para- transit services. • Paid driver ride services, such as Uber and Lyft; • Volunteer driver ride services for which the driver either does not or does receive some form of compensation (donation, credit toward services, mileage, etc.); and Page 2 �tr1A, Le con teau • Non - emergency medical transportation (NEMT) for people who have Medicaid, Home Health providers (some offer transportation in cars as part of their services), VA transportation services, etc. There was further discussion about the phrase "for hire" and whether it applies when a driver receives: • Monetary compensation for providing a ride and the fee is set and obligatory; • Monetary compensation for providing a ride, but the fee is suggested and voluntary; • Non - monetary compensation for providing a ride, such as credits to use toward services; And /or whether it applies when a rider pays the driver or a business or non - profit entity: • A set and obligatory fee for a ride; • A suggested and voluntary fee for a ride; or • For ride services through an association fee or membership. The definition of "taxicab" in City Code does not include "motor vehicles subject to control and regulation by the state public service commission, motor vehicles regularly used by undertakers in carrying on their businesses, or motor vehicles hired on an hourly basis." An internet search for the term "public service commission" did not produce results for Minnesota. It is therefore not known what vehicles are excluded from this definition. Licensing Edina City Code Sec. 12 -316 requires that taxicabs operating with the city must display a valid taxicab license decal issued by the City of Bloomington, City of St. Louis Park, or the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). A driver of a taxicab must be licensed by Bloomington, St. Louis Park, Richfield, or the MAC. A search of the St. Louis Park city website for taxicab licensing did not produce results. Taxicabs that carry passengers to Edina but who do not solicit business or pick up passengers within the city are exempted from this licensing requirement. The definitions of "taxicab" differ between cities. Whereas Edina's definition of taxicab includes all motor vehicles engaged in carrying passengers for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, Bloomington includes vehicles with seating capacity for up to seven people and not operating on a fixed route. Richfield includes vehicles with seating capacity for up to eight people and not operating on a fixed route. Page 3 Analysis: / 1A, ow Le. v �y • ����nrut��'tr" � teen The definition of "taxicab" in Edina City Code casts a wide net and includes transportation services that are not commonly thought of as taxicabs. It is unknown whether there is actually an expectation that all of these services be licensed as required in the Article. This lack of clarity creates two issues: I. Service providers may unknowingly be operating in violation of the licensing requirements; 2. New service providers may be inhibited from operating in Edina because of the licensing requirements; in some cases, these requirements may not apply to the service provider, but that fact is not clear. There is a growing need for transportation options in Edina, whether for seniors who no longer drive, people with disabilities that prevent them from driving, single car families, people who choose not to drive, or people who cannot afford their own car. Both nonprofit and for - profit organizations are responding to these needs by providing a variety of transportation options. These options do not fit neatly into the City's "taxicab" Code, creating the potential for issues with compliance and difficulties for transportation providers to serve Edina residents. In addition, City Code Article 12, Section VII appears to contain at least two outdated, references. ITN (Independent Transportation Network) Twin Cities is a non- profit volunteer driver /paid ride service that would like to operate in Edina beginning in August. The ETC was approached by Edina resident Arlene Forrest, a board member of ITN Twin Cities, with a request that we recommend a change in City Code. The recommended change would have provided an exemption from the licensing requirements for ITN and similar services. Upon discussion, the ETC consensus was to recommend a more thorough legal review and modification of the code. Recommendation: A thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 12, Article VII of Edina City Code that takes into consideration the range of non - profit and for -profit transportation services now serving and potentially serving Edina. Due to an interest from ITN Twin Cities to begin operating in Edina in August, the ETC recommends that this review and modification be completed as soon as possible. Prepared by: Jennifer Janovy Reviewed by: Emily Boettge and Courtney Whited Date: July 19, 2014 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure\Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM\Advisory Communications\20 MItem VIII. x ETC Advisory Communication.docx To: MAYOR & COUNCIL A, �t o e' • �.,_ _moo • Agenda Item #: IV. M. From: Eric Roggeman Action EK Finance Director Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Set December 2, 2014 Public Hearing Date for 2015 Levy & Budget Action Requested: Staff recommends that the City Council set Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. for the budget and levy public hearing. Staff also recommends that the City Council set Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. for the budget and levy adoption meeting. Information / Background: M.S. 275.06 was modified by law enacted during the 2014 legislative session. The statute now requires that the City adopt a proposed budget and levy and certify the proposed budget and levy to the county auditor by September 30 (previously September 15). The county auditor will use this information to prepare and send parcel specific notices between November I I and November 24. The statute also requires that the City shall announce the time and place of its subsequent regularly scheduled meetings at which the budget and levy will be discussed and at which the public will be allowed to speak. This public input must occur after November 24 and must start at or after 6 p.m. The time and place of the public input meeting must be included in the minutes but newspaper publication of the minutes is not required. The City is also required to certify our final property tax levy to the county auditor by December 29, 2014. The final levy may be less than or equal to, but not higher than the preliminary levy. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50t St. • Edina, MN 55424 1 REPORT RECOMMENDATION 4,9�N��fr�, O e� m V �y �bR�u P To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item M. IV. N. From: Bill Neuendorf Action M Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -102, Authorizing Grant Application to Hennepin County for TOD Infrastructure Planning Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 -102. Information / Background: The University of Minnesota Metropolitan Design Center and Cuningham Group have prepared a conceptual study to potentially expand the redevelopment outcomes in the Grandview District. This concept, referred to as the "Grandview Highway Lid ", was originally presented to the City Council at the May, 2.0, 2014 Work Session. The concept, in summary, would create a shared parking garage and landscaped deck above Highway 100 and re =align the existing on /off ramps. There is also the potential to integrate transit access to facilitate improved express bus service to Edina. This infrastructure improvement would better connect the neighborhoods on both sides of the highway and would yield an additional 8 -acres of land that could -be .built upon to create a vibrant district with a mixture of housing, retail and community amenities. This concept further advances the pedestrian connection across Highway 100 identified in the 2012 Grandview Development Framework. This summer, the concept was presented to MnDOT officials. They agreed that this concept has merit and is worth exploring further. It was recommended that the City work in partnership with Hennepin County to better understand the scale and feasibility. The Hennepin County TOD Infrastructure grant is a likely funding source to advance the engineering and planning study. In addition to the need for additional engineering and planning, this concept will also require thorough community review to determine both the financial feasibility and the appropriateness for the Grandview area. This grant application should not be interpreted as a full commitment to construct the envisioned highway lid, but rather as the next step in a measured study of a creative, community - building strategy. The City has funds remaining from the Grandview I TIF District. It is anticipated that $100,000 of these funds will be used to match a grant from Hennepin County. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -102 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 { RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -102 AUTHORIZING GRANT APPLICATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR TOD INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a statutory city eligible to apply for grant funding; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( HCHRA) is making up to $1.075 million available to support transit- oriented development and is soliciting requests for grant applications to further this goal; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina adopted the GrandView Development Framework in 2012 to advance the redevelopment goals in this. area; and WHEREAS, the University of Minnesota, Metropolitan Design Center and Cuningham Group have prepared a concept plan for the Grandview Highway Lid dated July 25, 2014; and WHEREAS, additional engineering and planning study is necessary to determine the scale and feasibility of the potential infrastructure improvements in the vicinity of Highway 100 and Vernon Avenue/W. 50th Street; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has tax incremental funds available to achieve redevelopment goals and match the Hennepin County grant funds, if necessary. BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina act as the legal sponsor for TOD infrastructure project and that Mayor James B. Hovland is. hereby authorized to apply to Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( HCHRA) for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Edina. _ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the HCHRA, the City of Edina may enter into an agreement with the HCHRA for the Grandview Highway Lid Preliminary Planning Study, . and that the City of Edina certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. i 4 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 16th day of September, 2014. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL w9). A,1� O e �y • ,MCORPoRp,�'O • rase Agenda Item #: IV. O. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -103 Setting Public Improvement Hearing, October 21, 2014, Valley View Road Reconstruction Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -103 setting public improvement hearing for October 21, 2014, for Valley View Road Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -377 Information / Background: Staff is requesting a public hearing for improvements to Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive. This project was initiated by staff. Staff will submit the preliminary engineering report to the council prior to the public hearing. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -103 Setting Public Improvement Hearing for October 21, 2014 G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA377 VV Rd fr McCauley- Braemar(Hairpin) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY \PUBLIC HEARINGS \Item IV. x. Res. No. 2014 -xx Setting PH.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -103 SETTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD RECONSTRUCTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 21St day of October, 2014, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m., to consider improvements to Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearings and improvements as required by law. Dated: September 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 A, O Le V .888 To: City Council Agenda Item #: IV. P. From: Brian E. Olson, P.E., Director Of Public Works Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Amendment To Edina Public School District 273 Communications Site Lease, Community Water Tower Action Requested:We are seeking to amend the 01/22/2013 lease agreement with Edina School District 273 at the Community Water Tower Information / Background: In 2013, the City of Edina recorded the donation of equipment to Edina Public School District for use with its custodial and security staffing. The antenna is located on the community Water Tower. In the spring of 2014 the School reached out to the City about adding an additional digital antenna system on the tower to accommodate coverage for the entire district. This coverage would also allow the school not only better communications within but it would also allow a greater coverage area in the event of a district wide emergency. A structural and frequency interference study was performed at the Schools expense and it was determined that this would be an acceptable location for placement. City staff recommends the approval of the attached lease amendment to add one additional digital Antenna, to better enhance the safety, security and operations within the School district while not impacting City property or leases with other telecommunications companies. Staff has attached the original lease agreement and the new amendment for your consideration. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT. THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT is entered into this d day of 5 2014 between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "City"), and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL :DISTRICT NO. 273, a Public Corporation, ( "Tenant "). 1. SITE LEASE AGREEMENT. The City and Tenant entered into a Site Lease Agreement dated January 22, 2013 ( "Site Lease Agreement "). The Site Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect except as specifically amended by this amendment. 2. AMENDMENT. Paragraph 5A of the Site Lease Agreement is amended to read: Subject to the terms of this Lease, and the recommendations of the City's communications consultant, the Premises may be used by Tenant solely for the purposes of installing, removing, maintaining the communications equipment the City has donated to Tenant and a Motorola Monorturbo antenna and radio system. ( "Communications Facility ") and in accordance with the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals authorized for use by Tenant by the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC"). This use is non - exclusive, and City reserves the. right to allow the Premises to be used by others, and to make additions, deletions or modifications to its own facilities on the Premises as provided herein. Tenant shall comply with all ordinances, statutes and regulations of local, state and federal agencies. IN" WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Communication Site Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF EDINA BY: 178107v James Hovland, Its Mayor AND ' Scott Neal, Its City Manager IV THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 RNK COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Lease ") is entered into this ;;,iND . day of JA,vNARY , 20/3 between the CITY OF EDINA , a Minnesota municipal corporation, ("Landlord" or "C ty "), and J. i1o('g— eyd- <cRclol ptSi1R cf. a3 , a �� LC/ corporation, ( "Tenan t "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Landlord is the owner of certain real property located at Minnesota, as legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made apart hereof ( "Property "); and WHEREAS, Landlord has donated to Tenant certain equipment that is in place on the Landlord's Water tower; and WHEREAS, Tenant has requested that the Landlord lease a portion of the Property to Tenant to enable Tenant to maintain and use the donated equipment; and WHEREAS, Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant a portion of the Property for the Communications Equipment that Landlord has donated to Tenant subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY. Subject to the following terms and conditions, Landlord leases to Tenant certain space on Landlord's water tower located on the Property subject to all existing easements together with appurtenant non - exclusive easements for access and utilities on Landlord's Property on a non - exclusive basis. The primary purpose of Landlord's ownership of the Property is to: (a) operate and maintain a municipal water tower so as to provide water service to residents of; and (b) to provide communication systems to the Edina and other radio tenants. 2. TERM. This Lease shall be for an indefinite term. 3. RENT. On the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Landlord, as rent for the term of the lease One Dollar and No /100 ($1.00). 4. USER PRIORITY. The Landlord and Tenant agree that the following priorities of use, in descending order, shall apply in the event of communication interference or other uses of the Property that conflict with Tenant's uses or other users of the Property while this Lease is in effect: a. The Landlord's water storage and distribution needs and the Landlord's 167791v] communication needs. b. Existing leases on the Tower and the Property, unless there is a material modification of any existing equipment configuration and/or frequency characteristics. C. Other government- related entities who offer a service to the general public-for a fee, in a mariner similar to a public utility, such as long distance and cellular telephone, not including radio or which the County is legally authorized to provide. This use shall be non - exclusive, and the Landlord specifically reserves the right to allow the Tower and Property to be used by other parties and to make additions, deletions, or modifications to its own facilities on the Tower and the Property. d. New leases or renewals of existing leases for non - public safety communications. 5. PERMITTED USES. a. Subject to the terms of this Lease, and the recommendations of the City's communications consultant, the Property may be used by Tenant solely for the purposes of removing and maintaining the communications equipment that Landlord has donated to Tenant ("Tenant's Equipment ") and iri accordance with the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals authorized for use by Tenant by the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC "). This use is non - exclusive, and Landlord reserves the right to allow the Property to be used by others, and to make additions, deletions or modifications to its own facilities on the Property. Tenant shall comply with all ordinances, statutes and regulations of local, state and federal agencies. b. Landlord agrees to give reasonable advance notice of any major repair or maintenance activities related to Tower operations. In the case of an emergency, notification is not required; however; Tenant will be notified as soon as possible of a recognized emergency. In the event that use of the Tower for water service, or use of the Tower to perform any necessary maintenance or repair, is interrupted or made impractical because of Tenant's Equipment on the Tower, the City may interrupt Tenant's use of the Property as reasonably necessary to prevent interruption of water service or intemiption of maintenance and repair of the Tower. The City will use its best efforts to prevent or minimize interruptions to Tenant's use. C. Any additional expense of repainting, repairing, or maintaining the Property, Building or Tower reasonably incurred by the City as a direct consequence of the presence of Tenant's Equipment being located thereon shall be paid promptly by Tenant to the City upon receipt of the City's written notice of such additional cost, which notice shall state the reason(s) for the incurring of such costs and shall include a reasonable itemization of such costs. e. Tenant shall notify the City of Edina of scheduled work on Tenant's Equipment that is to be done after 5:00 o'clock p.m. on business days, and any time on weekends and holidays. The notice shall be given to City so that it is received at least 48 hours in advance of 167791v1 2 the start of the scheduled work. In the case of Tenant's emergency work on Tenant's Equipment Tenant shall notify the City as soon as practicable after commencement of the work. f., Tenant may not add, change or alter Tenant's Equipment without the prior written approval of the Landlord. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord for all reasonable costs incurred by the Landlord. in connection with any alteration or modification of, or addition to, Tenant's Equipment pursuant to this paragraph, including but not limited to plan review, structural review, site meetings, inspection time, and as -built up; dating because of Tenant's changes, including attorney's fees for drafting and and/or reviewing documents; provided, however, that with respect to any such alteration, modification or addition, additional Rent may be charged for the additional equipment that is installed by Tenant. 6. TENANT'S COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. a. Landlord agrees to maintain and operate the Property and the Property in accordance with good engineering practices, with all applicable FCC rules and regulations. b. Tenant shall be solely responsible for any taxes on its personal property. 7. UTILITY SERVICE. Landlord will allow Tenant, at Tenant's cost and expense, to connect to its existing utility services. Tenant shall furnish Landlord with pertinent information as to the exact type of AC power requirements, and at Tenant's cost and expense, Landlord's electrician will wire the dedicated circuit. Landlord will review Tenant's power usage based on Tenant's application, and what Tenant believes to be its average monthly kilowatt hours. Landlord may charge additional Rent to Tenant's for the electricity used by Tenant. Landlord shall not be responsible for any damages which occur as a result of interruption of any utility services. The Property does not have a generator; therefore, Landlord is not responsible for providing emergency backup electricity to Tenant if there is an interruption in electric service to the Property. Landlord will provide and pay for the cost of air conditioning the Building. Payment for telephone service for Tenant's Antenna Facilities shall be Tenant's responsibility without any adjustment to Rent. 8. TERMINATION. a. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without penalty or further liability by either party on sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other Party. b. Upon termination of this Lease, Tenant shall, within thirty (30) days thereof, remove all of its property. Tenant, at its expense, agrees to return the Property and the Tower surface where Tenant's property has been to their original condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Any of Tenant's property remaining on the Property or the Tower thirty (30) days after the expiration or the termination of this Lease shall be removed by Landlord at Tenant's cost and expense and shall become the property of Landlord free of any claim by Tenant or any person claiming through Tenant. 167791A 3 9. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION. a. General. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which maybe asserted against or incurred by Landlord or for which Landlord may be liable in the performance of this Lease, except those which arise solely from the negligence, willful misconduct, 'r ot her fault of Landlord. Tenant shall defend all claims arising out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or presence of Tenant's Communication Facilities, equipment and related facilities on the Property. b. Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents, covenants and wan.ants that its use of the Property will not generate and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Property, nor transport to or over the Property, any Hazardous Materials, unless Tenant specifically informs Landlord thereof in writing twenty -four hours prior to such storage, disposal or transport, or otherwise as soon as Tenant becomes aware of the existence of Hazardous Materials on the Property. The obligations of this Paragraph 13 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. 10. LIMITATION OF LANDLORD'S LIABILITY. If Landlord terminates this Lease other than as of right as provided in this Lease, or Landlord causes interruption of the business of Tenant or for any other Landlord breach of this Lease, Landlord's liability for damages to Tenant shall be limited to the actual and direct costs of the removal of Tenant's property. 11. ASSIGNMENT. This Lease, or rights thereunder, may not be sold, assigned, or transferred at any time by Tenant. 12. NOTICES. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses: If to Landlord: City of Edina 4801 W 50" St. Edina, MN 55424 167791 v1 4 with copy to: City Attorney Campbell Knutson Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 If to Tenant: with copy to: 13. MISCELLANEOUS: a. Complete Lease: Amendments. This Agreement supersedes all prior discussions and negotiations and contains all agreements and understandings between the Landlord and Tenant. This Agreement may only be amended in writing signed by all parties. Exhibit "A" is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. b. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts by the parties hereto. c. Bindin Ems. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Landlord and Tenant. d. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws . of the state in which the Landlord's Property is located. e. Severability. If any term of this Lease is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. f Recitals. The Recital paragraphs and the terms and definitions therein are incorporated into this Lease as if they were set forth herein. 167791vl 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: CITY OF EDI B James Hovlatid, is Mayor AND colt eal; It C' Anager TENANT: j b : 73�tha BY: �)av \ �) L W1n, -e (-j Its: Q ; r Q v-+G r- 0-� _rr Q "11,40 4 a ► o ;'v �a; v,a P��1�c Scl„oo1S THIS 1NSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate. Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 j RNK EXHIBIT "A" TO COMMUNICATION SITE LEASE AGREEMENT 167791vl To: Mayor and Council o e� In V, q�� P0 Agenda Item #: V. A. From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: Sept. 16, 2014 Information Subject: August "Speak Up, Edina" Report Action Requested: Receive report on August 2014 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about community gardens. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014 -2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUp.Edina.ocg. In August 2014, the discussion topic centered on community gardens. In this online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Should the City add more community gardens? • If the City were to add more community gardens, where should they be? • Do you currently use a community garden? If so, which one? If not, would you if more were available? The discussion was open for comments between July 31 and Sept. 2. During that time, 59 comments were made. Additionally, 681 people visited the site 949 times, garnering 3,909 page views. About 33 percent of all site traffic during that period was from Edina (according to their internet provider). Ninety-three percent of commenters were from Edina. The discussion was promoted through various means, including a press release, Facebook. Twitter and NextDoor posts, City Extra messages and direct outreach. Attached are the comments on this topic. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50rh St • Edina, MN 55424 Ct_ty of Edina I-1 HD= Projects Sign • FO Fa»ail Meeting -- °- – ------ - - - - -- email address._ Password password... or, Sign In witir Co eSri�lll Sign In ur« n Tweet Share SJ, o 1 ���� o e �. 0 •44�OIfI'OIt+�1��• This Discussion channels currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Community Gardens The City of Edina began its first comnwity garden in 2013. The Yorktown Park Comratmhy Garden, next to Edina Fire Station No. 2, contains 10 10 -by- 10 foot plots and 40 10 -by -15 Shot plots. Plot priority is given to those who have rented a plot in the past, then new plot renters who are Edina residents, followed by new renters who work in Edina, then new renters who do not live or work in Edina. The Yorktown Park Conummity Garden has filled up very quickly in its first two... 3 Topics 59 Answers I Closed 2014 -09-01 View Discussion Topic: More Gardens? Should the City add ,pore community gardens? Why or why not? 29 Responses 29 Responses Larry Cl, un la about 1 month ago Should more cotnratnity gardens be added? Yes. The City is promoting a healthier lifestyle and lire theme of "going green." What better action to take than to provide more access to more residents through more coma i u ity gardens? The concept is sound, provcn, and popular. It is the execution that often is the issue, not the concept. The City prides itself on the quality of Ile and of doing things right the fast tune. Quality, going green, doing it right the fast time all apply to the execution of any conhmtmity garden. Adding a community garden on poorly located and poorly prepared sites is self - defeating and a waste of taxpayer money. Conurnmity gardens will be successful and self - sustaining when the community garden is properly located. The site must have at least 6 -8 howl of direct sunlight. The soil must be "garden- friendly and sustainable." The soil rust not be in a low area and water should easily aril quickly drain from the area. Any sub -soil that prevents proper drainage ors not'beggie- herb -plant viable" must be removed to a depth of at least 24" and replaced with better so171iat soil could include a mix of black dirt (45 1/o), cohost (45 %), and sand (10 %). Preferably the site should not be on a land -fill or area that was used to damp construction waste, whether from roads, parking hots, or buildings. When you build the soil properly, the gardens become self - sustaining. Community gardens are almost maintenance fi•ee —no mowing, no application of insecticides or herbicides as is often required on our parks. The City should not need to rehrn to (lie site to fix problems regarding drainage, poor soil, or water overflow from adjacent areas. Com ni umy gardens are for growing healdhy plants that are pesticide -free allowing people to (rave a healthier lifestyle. As seen in the current coninnu» ty garden, people socialize, help each other, and take it upon themselves to make their plots more viable and productive. 8 Supports Catherine Puller 15 days ago Hello: I am in favor of adding more community gardens, particularly in locations where residents can walk. I live in the Birchcrest neighborhood, and would love to see a garden in Bircherest Park. It is a sorely underutilized park, has plenty of all day sun, is flat, accessible, and surrounded by young families. Aside from the play area, the vast "playing field" is used hardly at at And as another commentator mentioned, in spite of the large yards that many of us have, the mature trees make full sun vegetable gardening urgrosstble. 3 Supports :comment... Reply to Catherine Fuller :comment... i, I Reply to Larry Cipolla to r ti F ran.Fabrizto about I month ago Yes - the popularity of the fist one would suggest that there is plenty of demand. I'd love to see this model replicated in other neighborhoods. I'd sign up for a plot if there was a garden available near the Community Center or St. Johns, Pamela, Arden or Garden Parks. 5 Supports comment... - -- ., - , - — Reply to Fran Fabrizio1 i i ,noel Stegner, Communitywlunteer about 1 month ago Larry is a piaster gardener who has volunteered hundreds of hours and several wonderfid classes that have helped novice community and Ihoine gardeners to start successfWly growing vegetables and flowers. The City of Edina owes him a debt of gratitude for getting our first conmwnity garden "off the ground." He is absolutely right about everything lie talks about. I'd Ike to add another point - garden location The Yorktown garden near the Southdale Y is in the SE portion of Edina, immediately adjacent to Richfield and not that tar from the boundary with Bloomington It is very convenient for those of us (I garden there) who live within 10 minutes of the garden If I lived in the NW part of Edina - e.g. by Van Valkenberg fields - it would be very inconvenient to drive that far for a conoanity garden Before Edina had a comnnu ity garden, I started community gardening in Chanhassen, where my sister's family lives. A truly mature garden - what every conmmunity garden looks Ike after all the bugs get worked out - but at least a one -way 20 minute drive. It is very hard to get to the garden often enough ifyou live too far away. I would suggest that the ideal community garden set up for Edina would be to attempt to have one community garden in each of the four quadrants of the city, because then everyone who lives here could get to one in a reasonable tune. There are some misconceptions about community gardens. One is that people who live in homes with large lawns and trees don't use community garden The fact is that often given the size of established trees, that it is difficult to find a good space with full sun, and that a community garden is a good solution Also for these homeowners, if they love gardening, that love doesn't go away if they decide to downsize when their kids leave hone. So it sift home garden vs. community garden - but both - in other words giving people choices. Another misconception that community gardens are 'Socialist" or subversive in some vague way. Just think of our parks. Many of them are devoted to youth sports - used by different groups of people - really anyone who qualifies for the team and pays their activity fee. The city prepares the garden (just Ike it sets out the bases rakes the field and waters the grass), so people can exercise and enjoy the outdoors. A community garden is like any other community gaup - the city gets things organized and the group takes it from there. Also, there is little realization of what a community garden actually s. It doesn't require government intervention to set up a community garden A church, a school, a residential association or a business can set up a conmmwnity garden - and you will see that many have done so is Edina. Ifyou are a small government type who doesn't want government put in a position of starting everything, then start a commuity garden yourself Hit is your land, a comnanity gardens a statement about your values, . 7 Supports comment... — ----- - - - - -/ Reply to Joel Stegner ❑1 Son Radeke about 1 month ago I think the city should add more community gardens because there is a waiting list at the Yorktown Garden However, I would recommend waiting until the Yorktown Garden is working the way it was meant to work. Whoever chose that location failed to notice that the YMCA skate park drain empties right into the community garden so that whenever it rains all the rain comes whooshing out across and flooding the community garden There apparently is a plan to deal with this but I think it is important to make sure the original garden works before starting another one. 4 Supports ;comment... i; I Reply to Sandy Radeke Liz Jergensen 30 days ago This is a wonderfid idea! Our Yorktown Garden has been a guinea pig of sorts. We have had a few bumps in the road, which will only help the City of Edna create new Community Gardens more smoothly. We now have a'%st" of what to do to quickly set up Community Gardens that will work almost from the start. Lags response lists the most important items to consider for the decision nuaker(s) to use. This is a community builder, we at Yorktown have been slowly gathering names of people in our garden by word of mouth to create a list of0ardeners who "Opt In" to be listed publicly in our own gardener driven'bewsletter". Using this newsletter, we are (1) finding individual gardeners interested in getting together to buy "good black dint" and pay someone to till individual plots, to save money and (2) build a group that wants to be part of a more 'asocial set", getting together to tour the Arboretum have a pot luck, and so forth. Getting names and/or email addresses and telephone numbers to communicate with each other and help each other. One Gardener used this to ask about identifying a pest. I used this when I recently went on vacation, other gardeners watered my garden and I will do the same for them A gardener might ask for help if sick or unable to keep up with weeding due to a physical ailunenL When new Comimvuty Gardens arc created we could add them, just adding a colunn for which garden the gardeners be belong to. This could be a central list used for ideas, identifying pests, suggesting successful techniques, catalogs we enjoy, whatever we thinks useful The City of Edina offers opporttmity's for many demographics. This is adding an opportunity for many kinds ofgardeners. It also displays that yes, food comes fiom the earth. With our great education system our children know that, but a visible demonstration is always a good reminder! Who knows those kids participating and the kids waking by may be our dedicated hobby gardeners in the future! 4 Supports 1comment... Reply to Liz Jergensen Larry OWN 29 days ago I agree! Most surrounding communities inch ide one or more community gardens. They are widely used across the entire country. I just visited an Urban Farm in Cleveland, Ohio. Phenomenal response and use by families, seniors who have moved from their home to an apartment or condo, single people, and by people who want to know what is in their food. The current community garden in Edina includes a wide cross - section of individuals, including people who have lost part of their mobility. Raised beds afford access to the young, old, and anyone in between. There is a major disconnect between the food we eat and where it comes from This Nature Deficit Disorder is common in children and many parents. Food comes from a can, from a plastic or cardboard box, fi-om tine pantry or the freezer, or simply fiom the "store." Community gardens aril gardening in general provides people with the opportunuity and experience of making the connection between food production and food consumption Sitting in font of a computer reading about food production and consumption is handy. Getting your hands in the soil, even if a small community garden plot, is dandy. It builds self - confidence and provides people with a sense of accomplishment. 3 Supports comment... - - - - - -� I Reply to Larry Cipolla Anne Marie Gramme 29 days ago Yes, more gardens and in various locations so more people have access to them. I think raised beds for sonic of the spaces a good idea, as long as there are plenty of others available so people can get down in the dirt with hands and hoes. 4 Supports ;comment... i -- _ -.- -- ------- - -._._. -. _- .– _.---- .-- -__ —�. ply to Anne Marie Gramme 4 4 f Victoria Kent 27 days ago Yes!! A great way to teach adults and children about gardening, and a source of healthy food. 3 Supports :comment... Mind Ahler 23 days ago 4 1 Reply to Victoria Kent Yes, for all the reasons others have mentioned and to provide more healthy food options to more people. Also great way to build community as neighbors gardening together get to know each other at the same cure. 3 Supports ;comment... A I Reply to Mindy Ahler ❑1 Anoeln Lee 16 days ago I have been gardening at the York Av corrammity plot for two surniners and I support the idea of adding more community gardens. Gardening in community plots promotes a healthy lifestyle, healthy eating, and an activity that people ofall ages, cultures, and socioeconomic levels can enjoy. 4 Supports comment... Reply to Angela Lee n Laurn NM 15 days ego I am definitely in favor ofmore community gardens. For all of the well -made points above, especially those regarding connecting more to other residents. 2 Supports -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- !comment... - Reply to Leura Nisl ❑1 hiatthewSikich 15 days ago My Daughter, Angelina (age 6), and I have been gardening at the York Av community plot for two summers and I support the idea of adding more community gardens. Gardening fit community plots promotes a healthy lifestyle, healthy eating, and an activity that people of all ages, cultures, and socioeconomic levels can enjoy I It helps the "city' youth who do not have gardens at their residence understand where their FOOD actually comes from, and appreciate the enormous work, love, and dedication that fangs and growers make in their efforts to feed us. It is an incredibly valuable experience .... I love the gardens that the Edina Schools have begun to bring to the students and feel most neighborhoods would enjoy such an opportunity. We are all for more gardens ! 2 Supports - - - ----- ------------------------ - - ---- - - - - — - -- 'comment... Reply to Matthew Sikich tmise \Venn 15 days ago With the problems that come with large -scale farming, such as ongoing drought, flooding, and shipping costs, community gardening is a very valuable resource for food security in all comnnuiities. Hoare gardeners have more control over their own food supply. Community gardens offer residents a wholesome source of recreation and opportunity to share their enthusiasm with like- minded neighbors, developing a stronger sense of conuuunity. Small business opportunities increase around local food gardening as it becomes part of the culture. Gardening gives people precious renewal from a connection with nature. Everyone from young children to seniors love to team to grow something with which they can then nourish themselves. Summers so much more enjoyable harvesting food at its nutritional peak, like fresh tomatoes or salad greens, that you grew yourself: Zinnias are nice in a vase. Food can become a simple daily creative pursuit. In a community garden, gardeners have access to more food variety when they share produce, seeds, tools, and growing tips with each other. 2 Supports ,comment .. . ... ..- ....... - - . Reply to Louise Weaver Daw Bender 15 days ago Seems Ike a good use of public property to nre. How does the city deal with derelict gardeners, though? People who start out with the best of intentions but, uh, get busy as the suminer wears on? 0 Supports (comment... Lnutse Wearer 15 days ago Reply to Dave Bender I recommend everyone participate in Community Garden Day Saturday, September 131h, 2014. Get information at httpl /wwtv.gardeningmatteis or communi�L-earden -day 1 Support comment.. . --- ..-- ---- ..............__.__ - _ -- __ - - -- - - -- - -/. I Reply to Louise Weaver Judith Felker 15 days ago Dave, it seems to me that the gardener who can no longer care for his/her plot should let the other gardeners know and they can take it over, including reallocating it to someone on the waiting list. This problem doesn't qualify, it seems to me, as a "city problem". ! support community gardens for all the reasons others have mentioned, and also because growing our own food cuts down on the need for trucking fiesh vegetables and fruit, which reduces air, soil, and water pollution from use of fuel. Also, with Big Ag, like Monsanto, working to control the seed supply (actually suing Farmers who have Monsanto's patented seedlings blown into their crops). Growing our own food would preserve seeds other than Monsanto's, and keep us from being totally dependent on Big Ag for our food, a direction we seem to be going in. Connnuntm gardens? OH YES, the more the better! 1 Support comment... .. ... ... .............. _ ..... ...... _._. ___.. _ _ ...... .... ..... ._ -_ -- Reply to Judith Felker Katherine Stelbere Bus 15 days ago I would love to see the add at least one more community garden - scalable and sustainable growth in the number of plots. With the waiting list for existing plots, there is clearly a demand for gardening space. 2 Supports comment... t Donna DAaulla 15 days ago If you want a garden ... put one in your own back yard. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Katherine Stelberg Bass ._ ... - ...- _- ___ - -- - .- --- ___ ... . —i I Reply to Donna D'Aquila 4leanor Cnrlsan at August 28, 2014 at 11:37am CDT I believe community gardens are a wonderful thing for the city to be thinking about. I am all about supporting honey bees, and having community gardens is just what they need! One of the reasons their population is decreasing is because they don't have enough clean and local pollen to eat. Having community gardens in neighborhoods will not only benefit people in so many great ways, but also the honey bees in Edina. 1 Support icomment... Reply to Eleanor Carlson Janet' Westin at August 28, 2014 at 2:55pm CDT My husband and I are very fortunate to have space and light on our own property for a large veggie garden and lots of wildflowers to help out the bee populations, as well as butterflies and birds. Contnnauty garden space in our public parks is an excellent use ofpublicly owned land. If I were in an apartment or had a shaded lot, I would be signed up for corrmnm¢y garden space. Because many surrounding suburbs have now restricted use of their comnnnity garden space to- their own residents, there is a great need for Edina to expand the number ofcomnnmity garden sites, tapping Lary Cipolla as key advisor. I would like to see garden space added at the south end of Pamela Park, just north of 62nd Street where there is now no athletic field, lots of sun and the south parking lot nearby. This is a no- brainer for location A hand pump for water access could easily be put in (not far down to the groundwater). A 6' ht deer fence with gates would be necessary in this location Let's do this! I do not appreciate Donna DAquila's conmtent. 2 Supports comment... _ -- -- - -- — -- -- ------- _ ------ --- ------- ------- - - -- — ------- - ---- -------- --- - - -... Reply to Janey Westin Janet' Wes tin at August 28, 2014 at 2:55pm CDT My husband and I are very fortunate to have space and light on our own property for a large veggie garden and lots ofwildflowers to help out the bee populations, as well as butterflies and birds. Community garden space in our public parks is an excellent use ofpublicly owned land. IfI were in an apartment or had a shaded lot, I would be signed up for conmunity garden space. Because many sturounding suburbs have now restricted use of their cor rinunity garden space to their own residents, there is a great need for Edina to expand the number oftonarnmdy garden sites, tapping Lary Cipolla as key advisor. I would Ike to see garden space added at the south end of Pamela Park, just north of 62nd Street where there is now no athletic field, lots of sun and the south parking lot nearby. This is a no- bramer for location. A hand pmnp for water access could easily be put in (not far down to the groundwater). A 6' ht. deer fence with gates would be necessary in this location. Let's do this! I do not appreciate Donna DAquiila's continent. 1 Support comment... I I . laney Westin at August 28, 2014 at 2:55pm CDT Reply to Janey Westin My husband and I are very fortunate to have space and light on our own property for a large veggie garden and lots of wildflowers to help out the bee populations, as well as butterflies and birds. Commtntity garden space in our public parks is an excellent use ofpublicly owned land. If were in an apartment or had a shaded lot, I would be signed up for comnumityy garden space. Because many surrounding suburbs have now restricted use of their cornuwnity, garden space to their own residents, there is a great treed for Edina to expand the number ofcomnwnity garden sites, tapping Larry Cipolla as key advisor. l would Ike to see garden space added at the south end of Pamela Park, just north of 62nd Street where there is now no athletic field, lots of sun and the south parking lot nearby. This is a no- bracer for location. A hand pump for water access could easily be put in (not far down to the groundwater). A G ht. deer fence with gates would be necessary in this location. Let's do thisl I do not appreciate Donna DAqu iWs conmient. I Support . .............. ... comment... Reply to Janey Westin Janey. Westin at August 28, 2014 at 2:55pm CDT My husband and I are very fortunate to have space and fight on our own property for a large veggie garden and lots of wildflowers to help out the bee populations, as well as butterflies and birds. Community garden space in our public parks is an excellent use of publicly owned land. If I were in an apartment or had a shaded lot, I would be signed up for comnnutity garden space. Because many surrounding subtabs have now restricted use of their community garden space to their own residents, there is a great need for Edina to expand the number ofcommtunity garden sites, tapping Larry Cipolla as key advisor. I would Ike to see garden space added at the south end of Pamela Park, just north of 62nd Street where there is now no athletic field, lots of slut and the south parking lot nearby. Thus is a no- brainer for location. A hand pump for water access could easily be put in (not far down to the groundwater). A 6' ht. deer fence with gates would be necessary in this location Let's do this! I do not appreciate Donna DAqutla's comment. 1 Support comment Reply to Janey Westin Janey Westin at August 28, 2014 at 2:56pm CDT My husband and I are very fortunate to have space and light on our own property for a large veggie garden and lots ofwildf!owers to lielp out the bee populations, as well as butterflies and birds. Community garden space in our public parks is an excellent use ofpubficly owned land. If I were in an apartment or had a shaded lot, I would be signed up for community garden space. Because marry surrounding suburbs have now restricted use of their community garden space to their own residents, there is a great need for Edina to expand the ntmuber ofcominunity garden sites, tapping Larry Cipolk as key advisor. I would like to see garden space added at the south end of Pamela Park, just north of 62nd Street where there is now no athletic field, lots of sun and the south parking lot nearby. This is a no- brainer for location. A hand pu np for water access could easily be put in (not far down to the groundwater). A 6' ht. deer fence with gates would be necessary in this location. Let's do this! I do not appreciate Donna DAgwla's comment. 1 Support 'comment. . i 1 Janey. Westin at August 28, 2014 at 2:56pm CDT ------ - - - - -� Reply to Janey Westin My husband and I are very fortunate to have space and fight on our own property for a large veggie garden and lots ofwiildtlowers to help out the bee populations, as well as butterflies and birds. Community garden space in our public parks is an excellent use ofpubhcly owned land. If I were in an apartment or had a shaded lot, l would be signed tip for community garden space. Because many surrounding suburbs have now restricted use of their community garden space to their own residents, there is a great need for Edna to expand the number of community garden sites, tapping Larry Cipolla as key advisor. I would lice to see garden space added at the south end of Pamela Park, just north of 62nd Street where there is now no athletic field, lots of sun and the south parking lot nearby. This is a no- brainer for location. A hand pump for water access could easily be put in (not far down to the groundwater). A 6' ht. deer fence with gates would be necessary in this location. Let's do this I do not appreciate Donna DAgtula's comment. 1 Support comment... F Reply to Janey Westin T. i i Dianne Latham at August 29, 2014 at 4:36pm CDT Before adding more cormnunity garden plots, the City of Edina needs to carefully review the usage of the Yorktown garden. 50% of those having community gardens at Yorktown Park in 2013 did not renew their plot. Although there were 38 on die waiting list for the,2013 plots, there were only 10 on the 2014 waiting list. At least 7 of the 2014 plots were officially abandoned (4, 18, 44, 47, 32, 40, and 50). 7115 would appear to be an opportunity for the plots to be offered to those on the waiting list because late season crops can still be planted raid summer. When I visited the Yorktown Park community garden on 8- 27 -14, there appeared to be at least 8 abandoned plots given the weeds and lack of crops in them Either those on the waiting list did not avail themselves of the opportunity to rent a plot, or more than 10 plots were abandoned. The cost of setting tip a community garden is substantial, with Yorktown Park costing the City of Edina over $30,000 including staff tune, soil prep, fencing benches, adding pluming for water, picnic tables, redirecting flue bike path, adding a sidewallc in front of the garden, and adding a parking lot. The real value of community gardens are not the small amount of produce they provide. The real value is that they are another source of recreation for residents and that they are a learning site, which result, in residents returning to the place where they live and beginning vegetable gardens on their own property. At a community garden, residents come and learn how to vegetahle garden with the help of commendable vol nteem Ike Master Gardener Tarry Cipolla. But it becomes readily apparent to those with plots that community gardening is pretty inconvenient, even if the community garden is in your neighborhood. The result is that commuriky gardeners often take their new skills home, trim their trees, remove their sod and plant a garden on their own property. Those that live urn townhomes or apartments lobby their landowners to allow a community garden, which then becomes an amenity and selling point fior their facility. Tiiat is what has been happening at Yorktown Park and explains, in part, wiry some do not renew their plot Former Yorktown Park community gardeners Louise Weaver and Lisa Childs are to be commended for starting (Louise) and expanding (Lisa) a community garden at their apartment complexes. Before considering other community gardens on city property, the City of Edina should wad until Uiere is a more robust waiting fist at Yorktown Park such that few, if any, plots are standing fallow at the end of the season The city should nevertheless encourage owners of multi fan-&y housing, companies, schools and churches to establish community gardens on their property, which if successful, will meet many more residents' community gardening needs than a city community garden ever could. 0 Supports .loci Steener. Conuvunity tolonteer at August 29, 2014 of 5:34pm CDT I agree with Diane's cominent regarding encouraging other organizations to set up community gardens, because that gives many more people the opportunity to be in community gardens that would be true if only the city does this. Also, it is a way to build interest among young people for gardening and is a way for an organization like a church that wants to provide food assistance to the poor to do so, as fresh produce is more difficult for food shelves than canned goods to obtain. She is also correct in saying that community gardens are an excellent way to build a sense of conmunity, particularly among families without school aged children, who develop many connections through school However, there isift a person in Edina who wouldn't benefit from the opportunity of meeting a wider.circle of people than those who live in the neighborhood, go to their church or are parents of student's in their chill's Bade or team it gets people off the couch and out breathing fresh air, which is a plans for everyone. Of course, some people have properties that are suitable for gardening but many people aren't so hicky. The City of Edina provides park facilities to serve a wide mange of interests, but frankly the focus is one youth sports - witli millions spent in facilities. Edina could probably put in a community garden in every city neighborhood for the cost of putting in the new sports donne,.or the expanded ice arena, It isn't a matter of choosing one over the other -but choosing both. Gardening is a fife-long activity that involves fresh air, exercise, social connection and fresh flowers and vegetables. Expecting the city to invest in it is reasonable. As the gardeners who have been in Yorktown (such as niysel) would tell you, it is a learning experience - and we have had some tough issues to deal with, but year 2 is a vast anprovement over year 3. However, compare losing a few plants to the cost of losing a bunch of balls in a really bad round of golf- nnch less limtrati ng. i have gardened for four years in a community garden and if you saw what a mature community y garden looks Ike, you would be amazing. I have pictures to show d. And I wouldn't minimise the excitement of the harvest and the ability to eat the best tasting tomatoes you can ever imagine, without having to go to a farmer's market to get then[. So.there are voices of caution Ike Diane's which make some good points, but there is no reason wliy the City can of thouglntililly.plan additional community gardenis that are located throughout the city. 1 Support City of Edina l J Home PLoicets Si a oIdeas Muhl Meetings email address... Password ;password... or, Sign in with: o e&�i�h In Sign In —UP- Tweet snare _tl I`L This Discussion channel is currently closed. 0 We're alwaysqooking foi feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an .evenbetter place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here; or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! i JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Community Gardens The City of Edina began its first conurninity garden in 2013. The Yorktown Park Community Garden, next to Edina Fire Station No. 2, contains 10 10 -by- 10 foot plots and 40 10 -by -15 foot plots. Plot priority is given to those who have rented a plot in die past, then new plot renters who are Edina residents, followed by new renters who work in Edina, then new renters who do not live or work in Edina. The Yorktown Park Community Garden has filled up very quickly in its first two... 37oplcs 59 Answers Closed 2014 -09-01 View Discussion Topic : Location. Location. Location If the City were to add more conmumity gardens, where should they be?, 18 Responses 18 Responses Larry. Ctootln about 1 month ago Where would others benefit the conhm►vhie. Adding a second garden in die N W corner from die present garden would be one site, though this site has sub -soil and drainage problems drat would need to be corrected. Building raised beds, at least 18" high would help (after die sub -sotil has been removed and replaced with higher quality soi). Other sites could include Pamela Park (2 locations, one each on die north and south ends), Utley Park (on die south side of the tennis cou1s), Highlands Park (north of the soccer field), Lewis Park, Nomiandale Park (north side by the ice rinWbuilding), Fred Richardson park, and Highlands Park (north of due soccer field). I would also suggest that school yard gardens be placed on the Creek Valley School grounds (2 locations, plus a functional rain garden in die lowest area). in addition to conutnurky gardens and school yard gardens, the Edina City Council should consider recommending that new and/or existing condo and apartment rental units include resident gardens on their grounds or on the roof. Roof top gardens are very feasible and many cities around the country are incorporating them into their designs (new construction) and where feasible on existing buildings. These gardens would be for the residents of those buildings only. Community gardens can be diverse. In addition to providing land -plots for gardeners, community gardens can incorporate educational rain gardens, butterfly and huum ngbird gardens. Benches, picnic tables, and perhaps a covered pavilion for socializing, conducting gardening classes and other educational events could be added. Community gardens build community. They include people with diverse backgrounds and experiences. They bring people together. The City is planning to spend millions of dollars on its parks for new sports fields and facilities. There will be significant on -going expenses to maintain those new facilities and grounds. Cannot the City.find dollars to include conan iity gardens in other parks? Gardening is very popular and growing throughout die country and trey are not expensive to maintain. They are pesticide and herbicide free zones. Indeed, when constructed properly the general ongoing maintenance is almost none, saving taxpayers' money. Community, school yard, church, and roof -top gardens are not a novelty. They are not one- off projects or novelties. They are a way of life. They promote health y eating habits. They are generally chemical free and requit-e almost no ongoing maintenance once the sites have been properly established. Edina taxpayers win. 6 Supports ---- -- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- -comment... F}on Ralrrizio about t month ago Reply to Leriy Gpolla Locations Pd utilize would be (in order of preference) the Conuhuhity Center, St. Johns Park, Arden Park, Pamela Park, or Garden Park. 3 Supports comment... A Reply to Fran Fabrizio Joel Sterner, Community tolunteer'ahout 1 month ago Coninuhnity gardens need to be properiy.situated for optimal growing conditions (see Lany's corhutrents) and also need to be welcomed by the neighbors - or the neighborhood association if one has been forted. Given natural skepticism, it is also he¢rful to have someone speaking for community gardens who has experience, knowledge and passion for dent. In addition to looking at city parks, around the nietro area, some community gardens are set up on land controlled by a govcmnxnt unit - strch as highway right of ways - so they don't have to be located in a park, just in a good site with access to water. It probably snakes sense to look at all potential pieces ofproperty arouud.the city, with the goal of finding at least 2 -3 possibilities in the three quadrants fo the city without a community garden. Public lands that are in the process of redevelopment (e.g. Fred Richards) should consider a community garden as part of their overall set of amenities. Community gardens don't bave to start out welt as tinny plots as Yorktown, but it is desirable if they have some expansion space if demand is heavy enough. 3 Supports comment... — - -- - i, I Reply to Joel Stegner D Sandy Radeke about 1 month ago When deciding where to locate a new cornnumity garden, I hope the city will pay closer attention to the site conditions than was done at the Yorktown site. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Sandy Radeke Victoria Kent 27 days ago i think the Pentagon Park area OR part of Fred Richards would be a logical site. It is near high density housing. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Victoria Kent 0 Laurel Fischbach 27 days ago I love the idea ofusing St. Johns Pads. This piece of property is never used by anyone and it is in an easily accessible location from Hwy. 62 and 2 elementary schools, Southview Middle School and the Fatuily Center. The teaching and volunteer reach with this location would be ideal I would be thrived to help work in this garden to make it great. I also love the idea of making one portion a butterfly gardea 1 Support :comment... Reply to Laurel Fischbach A7indy Ahler 23 days ago Consider schools - can include school garden that conurmnity members could help maintain. Tis can be a beautiful, healthy and educational use of land that might otherwise first get mowed but not used as play space. Weber park or sonic other location in or near the Morningside neighborhood would also be great. 1 Support comment... Reply to Mindy Ahler Laura NisI 15 days ago Many schools are already doing this and the city should focus on areas that are clowned. The sic(s) should be easily accessible and placed equally around One city. 0 Supports comment... I Joel Acker 15 days ago — -A I Reply to Laura Nisl Perhaps Lake Edina Park would be a good location. There is a heavy concentration ofapartnnents near Urat park and the residents who live in apartments are those who are most in need of a community garden since they do not have the option of having a garden at home. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Acker Loulse Weaser I5 days ago I think creating a master plan, ofviable garden sites in each Edina neighborhood, would be very productive. The building ofgardens then could be prioritized. by areas, such as those serving the most people or where there is the most interest locally to be developed fast They could be anywhere in each neighborhood where they will be visible and lead to food gardening becoming part of the local culture. The idea of a special focus on gardens at multi - housing complexes is a good place to start, such as condos and apartment buildings, on site or within a short walking distance. I met a gardener like myself at Yorktown Garden, who wanted to garden, but questioned adding thirty minutes round -trip travel time by car to garden. I don't drive, so I found I had to take three buses and walk a few blocks each way. This amounted to about two hours travel time per visit. Community gardens in more locations would help. My parents learned gardening and worked the gardens on the school grounds to supply their school cafeteria. Children can team this important findamental skill and enjoyable pastime at school, which will be with them for their whole lives. I have been a member of a community garden elsewhere previously, where we had 12'x 3' x 8" raised beds. It was on an elevated demolished home site with excellent drainage, which was on loan by the owner. I could sit on the edge of the bed to weed, plant, or water, and it was low enough to use a tiller in each spring, which was done by the organizing staff It had a system of pvc pipes above ground that had hoses connected at the end ofeach section of beds. The system then connected to a nearby house by agreement with the owner. It worked very well and made watering doable in July and August. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Louise Wea7er Louann Waddick 15 days ago Yes, more gardens! We have mostly shade at our home and it's difficult to grow veggies. 1 Support ;comment... Reply to Louann Waddick ❑1 Bonnie Guarl 15 days ago Not every open park area will be suitable for gardens. For example, St. Johns park is designed to collect water runoff when we receive heavy tam. The park spent several days as a pond earlier this sutnnier! 1 Support ,comment... A• I Reply to Bonnie Guad .Katherine Stelberg Bass 15 days ago I love the idea ofadding some comnntnoy gardening space in another part of Edina - perhaps NW or SW quadrants. It's an interesting idea to consider a public - public partnership with Creek Valley Elementary, with some plots available for residents and some plots available for the schools' use. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Katherine Stelberg Bass gonna DAaulia 15 days ago if you live in an apartment... shop Trader doe's. Ifyour yard is too shaded for a garden —cut some trees down. 0 Supports tnuise Weairr at August 28, 2014 at 2:14pm CDT conmrent ... Please don't advocate for cutting down trees. We need as many trees as possible for our environment 0 Supports comment... _ ._ ....... ... __- - comment... i .Taney Westin at August 28, 2014 at 3:01 pm CDT 1 completely agree with Louise. 0 Supports comment... --- - Reply to Louise Weaver I Reply to Donna D'Aquila ..__....___- ...._. -- /.: Reply to Janey Westin i I Dianne Latham at August 29, 2014 at 4:38pm CDT Soil conditions in city parks are generally poor. Often low areas were filled in with construction debris and then filled with soil to make a level park area. Alilaugh sotne park areas look suitable to the casual observer, they are not The August 11, 2009 John Kep►ios staff report identified 3 locations for possible city cone rnu ity gardens. These were Yorktown Patio (currently completed), Pamela Park (tire area has since been taken over by an athletic field and is not available) and Lake Edina. Lake Edina (the site of the fomier Fred Richards golf course) is located proxinrale to high density housing, a desirable feature. But this location serves the same SE area of Edina as the Yorktown Park comtnunity garden does. If Yorktown Park is not renting at capacity (at least 8 vacant plots during the 2014 season), would a Lake Edina commiurity garden. fill? 0 Supports comment... A I Reply to Dianne Latham !Cathryn Thomas at August 31, 2014 at 11:29pm CDT I would like to see the city add on to the existing garden off York by the fire station. I would also Ike to suggest adding community garden space in the smaller parks in die city such as Birchcrest'Park on Hansen Road. Another suggestion is to haye conumui ty gardens in die outside hockey rinks where die ground space could be used for. hockey in the winter and garden space in die spring and sunnner. 0 Supports :comment... :Sign Up - -- - ----/ I Reply to. Kathryn Thomas City of Edina EHome • Projects Sign Forums Ideas En& Meetings !email address... ... ...... .. ................. _ Password ,password... or, Sign In with: Cohn Sign In PLUD Lmko 0 Tweet! Share �•Ji i° I 1Zl A, ow >4 In • iA-brn�cnu�"�r� ,sar, This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Community Gardens The City of Edina began its first community garden in 2013. The Yorktown Park Community Garden, next to Edina Fire Station No. 2, contains 10 10 -by- 10 foot plots and 40 10 -by-15 foot plots. Plot priority is given to those who Irave rented a plot in the past, then new plot renters who are Edna residents, followed by new renters who work in Edina, then new renters who do not live or work-in Edina. The Yorktown Park Community Garden has filled up very quickly in its fast two... 3 Toplcs 59 Answers closed 2014 09 -01 View Discussion Topic: Garden Use Do you currently use a community garden? If so, which one? If not, would you if more were available? 12 Responses 12 Responses F l.urry Ctpolla about l mouth ago I do not currently use a community garden. I am the master gardener volunteer who has presented several gardening classes- -from beginning to advanced -- and have volunteered airy time to help gardeners with their questions. Do people use comuritnity gardens? Absolutely! lire rental response for these fast two years has been great. The waiting list suggests that the demand is there and that people will use the gardens. And people will continue to rent and use a community garden when the garden soil is viable and productive. Almost all of the surrounding connmmnities have community gardens. 2 Supports comment... Reply to,Larry Cipolla Fran Fabrizto about 1 month ago I have used a community garden in the past when 1 lived in a different state, and I would do so again if there were one within walking or biking distance. I don't have a great location on my property to place a vegetable garden, and I also enjoy the social aspect of talk_ ing to the other gardeners. Now that I have a son, i would also bring him to the garden, and he would love to explore and team how things grow. I Support - — - ........... _.- — — - icomment... Reply to Fran Fabrizlo .c Joel Stegner. Community volunteer about I month ago I have been in the Yorktown Connnmity Garden the last two years. I also have had a plot at a conrmtality garden in Clanlassen the last four years, three of the four years in a raised bed. As 1 am a Y member, the location of the Yorktown garden is very convenient for me - one drive accomplishes two purposes. As I just turned 65, I can speak for people who aren't as young as they once were. Elevated gardens tend to be smaller, but are a real back saver. l believe that Yorktown could use more elevated gardens, to be placed in the parts of the garden that are naturally wetter, as the dirt remains looser and the roots have better growing conditions. This might be accomplished at a somewhat lower costs if a partnership could be formed with young men wanting to be Eagle Scouts, as often building something for a public purpose is part of their program, or with a group of local wood workers, who have an interest in using their skills for comnnunity service. When additional community gardens are planned, I'd suggest that at least 10% of the plots are r elevated beds, primarily to serve Edina's older residents who don't need to grow as much food and would find the elevated bed much more appealing. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner IJsa Nelion about I month ago I have a garden in my' yard, but I have nevertheless enjoyed the Yorktown Community Garden. Members of the Edina Garden Cknb who five in condos or have heavily shaded backyards have cultivated plots there. I have toured the gardens and talked to several gardeners; had nreetmgs with EGC in embers who garden there where we had "tastings" of the produce; met new friends through it; and had people join the EGC because of it. EGC members have learned from other gardeners there and through their own experiences gardening there and they have shared tat knowledge Willi others. I wholeheartedly agree that this is a valuable, use ofpublic property, just as athletic facilities are. I also agree.that adequately preparing the site, adding raised beds and placing additional gardens in other areas of the city is very important to provide opportunities for more segments of the populations geographically and age- wise. 0 Supports ;comment... ............ _ --- Reply to Lisa Nelson Sandy Rndeke about 1 month ago I have had a plot at the Yorktown Community garden for the past two years. 0 Supports comment... - -- - -- -- _ . - ............. _..- ........ .... ....... ....... ...------ .- .....- ...- .- ..... ..._ - - - - -- ./. Reply to Sandy Rade k e] Anne Marie Gramme 29 days ago I have also had my plot h the Yorktown Garden for two years. We have had to deal with some adverse conditions, namely poor soil qua}rty as well as lack ofadequate drainage during very wet years. The adversity probably has a silver lining, as people have shared ideas on what works under such conditions etc. Those with a sense of humor have done best e.g. celebration over the harvest of the first bean - yes I said 'bean"not 'beans." The city is working to improve the quality of the basic structure of the garden, with the addition ofa permanent water source for dry weather and is apparently working on designing a tiling system to deal with the drainage fi-om the adjoining skate park. I am fortunate in living within walking distance and I think placing gardens in different areas of the city would be most beneficial, or perhaps expanding the area of the current garden in addition to placing others in other areas. The garden concept provides opportunity for people of all ages and abilities and is valuable in terms of socialmng, exercising and healthy eating. 0 Supports (comment... - — -- ---- - - - - -- -- -- ------- --------- — __. ------ - - - - -- —� I Reply to Anne Made Gramme Anne Marie Gramme 29 days ago Valuable asset. 0 Supports comment... --- - - - - -- -- - Reply to Anne Made Gromme Victorla Kent 27 days ago I am pail of the group renting plot 43. Last year I had my own plot. This year i find it enjoyable to share with others the work and produce. 0 Supports comment... - - - - -- -- - -- -A I Reply to Victoria Kent 23 days ago I do not currently use a conrmunity garden plot, but would like to use one because my yard is too shady to eliectively grow vegetables. The Yorktown garden is a little too far to easily bike to for me and filled up before I was able to get a plot. I just moved to Edina two years ago and was able to garden ut my yard in my previous home and miss it terribly. I'm happy to have big trees that shade the house and keep it cool in the summer, but it prohibits vegetable growing, so a community garden would be the perfect solution for me! 0 Supports comment... - --- — -- - -- - - - Reply to Mindy AhleJ era Nist 15 days ago I would definitely use one that was easy to get to from my house. The Yorktown ones not. In fact, I didn't know untih this discussion that it was open to people other than the residents there! 0 Supports comment... - - ............ — - — - - - - -- Reply to Laura Nis, Uuise Werner 15 days ago I have been gardening at the Yorktown Garden two years, but travel to the site by bus has been difficult for me. However, I have been advocating, along with others, Sir a community, garden at our seniors apartment building. With a grant firm Wells Fargo, we will have raised beds ready to plant next spring. I have to tell you that some people lure are starving for tine chance to have a garden, with people competing over space for pots on our small common patio; they only had room for a tomato plant or two. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Louise Wemr Jordan Gilgenbach From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:35 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: FW: Speak Up About Community Gardens! Lynette Blunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Iblunno(a?Ed!naMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov J ° ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Harriet Busdicker rmailto :harrietbusdickerC)gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Speak Up About Community Gardens! COMMUNITY GARDENS ARE GREAT FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO USE THEM AND KEEP THEM UP. On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, <mail@edinamn.gov> wrote: 1T1� o e 0 N� traw Speak U Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an oven bottor place for living, learning, raising familios and doing business_ Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up. Edinal SRI= your feedback! ► POST your ideas! P JOIN rho discussion! Speak Up About Community Gardens! As part of the City's 12 -month discussion series, weigh in on this month's discussion about I ommunity gardens! Let us know if you'd like to see more gardens, where they could be and whether or not you currently use a community garden. But hurryl This discussion ends Tuesday, Sept. 21 Nextdoor: RtPLY AMA) � ` Speak Up about Community Gardens! l: City Staff from City of Edina Only one week left to speak up on this month's "Speak Up, Edina!" discussion about Community Gardens! To read the comments and post your opinion, visit http: / /bit.lyNgSOkH. Shared with City of Edina in General REPLY 2 * Sandythankedyou Katherine B. from Braemar Hills 26Aug �� t= Yes, Edina is a residential community with lots of people who reside in apartments. They have no yard in which to garden. Further, I live In a single family home that Is entirely shaded and cannot grow vegetables though I have tried. I would love to see the city add some community gardening space since the available plots we offer (and residents pay to rent) fill up quickly and have had a waiting list every year Its been offered. There Is a demand for this public service. Thank Remove Shea H. from Braemar Hills As long as it doesn't cost the tax payers anything then fine, I.e. the rent should at least cover the cost (ALL the costs) just like any other business that doesn'twantta go bankrupt. Otherwise I'd like to see the city focus on lowering taxes and reducing the size of government please! Thank Remove , Write a reply... rl 2SAug 26 Aug w91NA)1�. Cn e I�CCRP01 AT, • 1886 PROCLAMATION CONSTITUTION WEEK WHEREAS, it is the privilege of all Americans to commemorate the two hundred twenty - seventh anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of 'America with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to officially recognize this magnificent document and the anniversary of its creation; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuance of a proclamation by the President of the United States of America, designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. THEREFORE, I James B. Hovland, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution and reflect on the privilege of being an American with all the rights and responsibilities which that privilege involves. IN' WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set by hand and caused the Seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this 16th day- of September in the year of our Lord two thousand fourteen. James B. Hovland, Mayor 01 'NA. 0 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Agenda Item #: VI. A. Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information El Subject: Public Hearing — Consider Vacation of Public Right -of -Way, 7151 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2014 -101 Action Requested: Approve attached Resolution No. 2014 -101. Information / Background: This request comes from Mesaba Capital in relation to the Continental Apartments Project. The existing street and utility easement is 30 -ft wide with the easterly 10 -ft dedicated to a utility easement. The applicant is requesting vacating the easterly 10 -ft of the easement or the 10 -ft utility easement. The City would retain the remaining westerly 20 -ft of the easement. The applicant will be using this additional 10 -ft to construct elements of the project closer to York Avenue. This will create engagement between the public and private spaces with the use of sidewalks and landscaping features. The City has storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain facilities on the west side of York Avenue and a fiber optic cable located under the sidewalk in front of 7151 York Avenue. Attached is a graphic showing the location of public utilities. This vacation will not impact public utilities. CenterPoint Energy does not object to this vacation. Xcel Energy has a primary electric line located within the 30 -ft easement that the applicant may have to work with if it's within their construction limits. Centuryl-ink and Comcast were unresponsive to our request for review. Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2014 -101. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -101 Public Right Of Way Vacation Application with sketches Notice of Public Hearing Graphic of City Utilities City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -101 VACATING UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a petition was received on July 28, 2014, from Mesaba Capital requesting vacation of a 10 foot utility easement per document number 1033725, item number 6; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on September 16, 2014, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the easement is not needed for public purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described easement is vacated: An easement for utility purposes over under and across the east 10 feet of the west 30 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Yorktown, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the transfer of this property. Dated: September 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov - 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952 - 826 -0392 �1NA. O e w BL Applicant City Of Edina, Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Phone ❑ (952) 927 -8861 TDD ❑ (952) 826 -0379 Fax ❑ (952) 826 -0390 RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION / MA JEN 6 1 t-T Address `5201 tpW IA��I �Y li b nt nr lw� p 6 O A m� 5 r3 43t Street "J r,, City /State '7 G1 I y� Zip �p /� Telephone No. cf A R6 "/ r 36`� 2- Fax No. I u 0 36 J O I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 24 -191: L 5`r p, IS. Street ❑ Alley Utility Easement q!! I ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Other Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically in a Word documents to the City of Edina City Clerk: Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water.? ❑ Yes N0 Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. • Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing in full detail the area proposed to be vacated. • Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply Information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of information submitted in the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Date Initiated /% 04/21/2014 Account No. 1001.4391 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I� I O �y I' lW Q 0 �h OWNER YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT P.ED. NO. 32-028.24.21-0003 OWNER: WINDSOR VENTURE Pla NO.32 -0TA.P4.24.OW1 xl OI hI W I° O� I� I I I I VICINITY MAP � LEGEND • u..r s.. a..... sa ::;; i ir.Pwwf- n,em.m NwwnCawbtawmm.Owww.DwtMf. - An. PVUtx. m.mLl's I�iL Nom Aar1. - I OWNER DAVIDR ANDQjSONa x. ealw>.,. aaawa. rw•• gmTan. lt. Nra .48wl.lm.rym.mrlrl.wrgmaYPPeiaM . xms>�sa,.ewm.ama.arewxml. DENISE S. ELOSTROAf I 4. Rro"W xswa IS PIrb.a e.aw Rrbme- O.anm.mbWprW.aepLwr - .. PJ.D. N0.32- 0"4- xZ00PB �v„otly By„a.mFr I I 0 P�r:-0 .:� v :7,aamDm Ilep01. NrbvITW mbwe Cmplry ro N•BLat- t.mfy.oa rat. � 1ABEe aural r wW.nlm Y. na lM bntlow PU4a.l ln0.aw.amu MC.4 awTLW W txIDxt®x.NL: L — — — — — L — _ antra EDC/.nDtal6ltDUD ee aBrNxanwaw,roury ExrwvanoN _ . ). )Ils.m. 111.m11aN rlpaP�o.i ®NOmNOli.tls•m WEST 71 % STREET 2 6 raver 1Dxs PD aC �p EB ITEeIw�,) w fa w. m..wxwaaL aMmfDlaDaroPw.n . -Irate mNa. mwr... rw. o. mW... wla .u4w.aPwtmre..w�mNDm....emfp. . r — — — nwL �e..m®uJa. wnre¢I.. a.�a.r e.m.nmm.vmmaa armnn aa.pe,e ' 1ro.L mwm.rmnw..+ea. �lafa.ww.+a"a.mea.am�otm I 10' ENS PEq DOC. �sm�.weam..a. Wawa.¢ mr .. ®..er.ew.mamow.w.aratlovrs.h. Mu•r •e.a•a W m a.law+at.l.m. N0. 1. 1053)28. REM N0.3.1 SOIFDILE B �1.' gwla6mMrvwib wO wwwlabwmwxwEm OSemaNn lDxlxp.IMLmwmtbmlLmn' PwWalNmlYWm111wan I I lE0aL0EawBIf10M f'�tCT'OFRIGIFa:LD I Pwvl l �' /.. 111DDD N0.314181af3-0BB7 I �ma Paa WxBmy Tamw•.smgia mua maeapaavLlMmpnCU.4.MM�L' `...: _- Lmpgeya..a lwew wm�oupcemwaim. N.auro,gt,Lw.v .M. a.em.emmacay�w�L ; I Lra' aem��rw ,�..r�mmw�'al�nx�.roW.nl.amwn mowalaxm.oaa tanLa.mraom.wim. I I mom' hr pN a 1x12 Bbl; Ywppwn -. malp b tlw naaba ar awloL Nw.spyf Cb.q.INeaa ... o+lmq.aa.b. brwmwM.v.pc«ma.anm rbalxm qm. am tl.m.m•l.rwml•.b -: -. egr.br.oaM tm.m arwr rww u. rMlr awa.wwttlwimtwalrxm.pM tssnhr.wl �• .. .. . awtl a..mnaur�wah. rai.,r.mn.attla.aar. rm•.xa -. I Ilq.bt.woM1 mltw,raLman lbnita ab.w llc,analmCmm�tlMVbq.IL0.m gwweNama)B.- ._... ., ..._ Ike. Cowvp ob Qmwb CamadY TIh h6 rat -. IIm.bwmtlw lrymf.wgGwnmEawvlW ®tlas Yb YOmlwwn hm�mPd6lYwpYlfe.%. I NInm.K m Nwtl L xalx : wr tlw tl •b Or awp Ma mE. m.wmf.o wal M I.N Bw'rY arumr. w q...Ll.fO mlSM wtltlw lRUYmmbbm. LLTNICBM Ir10T0.61wW.maawlmn LNl Mawm m.rw. D.mu q..rwm,m raK)AMfSMlcrrna9mwp ,111 � I Toar rramxN.•La... yptlmOlaaeMw�rrq w.IVmlra.Tr...wworawl.saL.•r „` w.a Pwwb w;aa f....,le.,,r tl.mrl. awl.,. a...mS.nm P.ae..m.a.efmsoor� I w... Bwm..n m.almL.rwE�oe.a e.. m.m.laaw•.•,wrawr.fum hr ®gW1og1 wrwnP.w Nw xlas5co�e. GLNNk NEMUMINaf9aN M wra¢soraueEraE xa Mw. wTe 5//g/r4- Legal Description for 10 foot utility easement, per Doc. No.1033725. An easement for utility purposes over under and across the east 10 feet of the west 30 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Yorktown, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date Sept. 2, 2014, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing On Vacation of Public ROW Easement (7151 York Ave) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 13 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of , 20 tq' Ell Edina N ��1r1A, l-1 _ owe �. vy 40 - • nibli�uJ Y4 4 .. , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION,OF:PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on' Tuesday, September 16; 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the 'following public right -of- way easement: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION An easement for utility purposes over, under and across the east 10 "feet of the west 30 feet of Lot 2; Block 3, Yorktown, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (7151 York Avenue). AI[ persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation, affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality' owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer .lines, or water pipes, mains, and 'hydrants on or under: the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise: attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation 'resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk September 2, 2014 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota55439 wwwEdiftaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 e Avery'v Template 516010 Yorktown Office Court 7101 York Avenue So Edina, MN 55435 hiquettes faciles a peler I 1 *111cns I'm milcavo C7C.n® j Feed Paper ® expose Pop -up EdgeT11 j Durham Apartments 7201 York Avenue So Edina, MN 55435 ' SeA de Repliez A la hachure afin de I r6vAIPr IP rahnrrl Pnn -unTM W J www.avery.com 1- ROMGMAVERY Hennepin County Property Interactive Map ' Interactive MAPS Search Map Advanced Search Flnd a PID or an address on the map Results Links Tax information View oblique imagery (Bing maps) Survey documents About the data .PID:3202824210004 7151 York Ave S - Edina, MN 55435 Owner /Taxpayer Owner. Yorktown Housing Group Inc YORKTOWN HOUSING GROUP INC Taxpayer: C/O HEARTLAND BANK 14125 CLAYTON RD CHESTERFIELD MO 63017 Tax District School Dist: 273 Sewer Dist: I Watershed Dist: 1 Parcel 5.85 acres Parcel Area: 254,805 sq It Torrens /Abstract: Torrens Addition: Yorktown Lot: 002 Block: 003 Metes & Bounds: Tax Data (Payable 2014) Market Value: $15,808,800 Total Tax: $199,175.94 Property Type: Low Income Rental Homestead: Non - Homestead Year Built: 1972 - Sales Sale Code: Sale Price: $10,215,300 Sale Date: 07/1996 Measure 3460 - Parcel- -Neighborhood ., Street City County Page 1 of 1 r 1 i E941 16c 3210 I .975 3100 _ - ___....__ -__! fA45 69; r 7001 70 7009 70 7015 70 76h - 70 Southda001b raryiouthdale Service Center 7000 I 7029 3009'30 I 7037 i I I - _--- ,3004130 I i 7045 1 30151.301113005 3383 I i I 241 I l ' 3020 ;3014:30 3301 3443 i I 712 7151 7230 FR061CNADE 7298 7191 24 4 '� ,4. rl �IV 7dA0' 200ft I t I I 7315 II - 7200 Ai htti):H2is.hennei)in.us /Drot)erty /man /default.aSDX ?Did= 3202824210004 9/2/2014 VWV w L 1 t F ly 609 ,�,) OaE o�' 3 C�M1� Aa.6AS 6AICI 'K '07 YN f) 6Al0l fAf, to ELL. t` 7 i To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. A. From: Eric Roggeman Action .® Finance Director Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 =100 setting preliminary 2015 budget and levy Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -100 adopting the preliminary 2015 tax levy and operating budget. Information / Background: M.S. 275.06 was modified by law enacted during the 2014 legislative session. The statute now requires that the City adopt a proposed budget and levy and certify the proposed budget and levy to the county auditor by September 30 (previously September 15). The county auditor will use this information to prepare and send parcel specific notices between November. 1 1 and November 24. The City is also required to certify our final property tax levy to the county auditor by December 29, 2014. The final levy may be less than or equal to, but not higher than the preliminary levy. The attached resolution will set the maximum proposed 2015 tax levies of $22,933,958 for the General Fund, $20,000 for the Arts and Culture Fund, $1,617,072 for the Construction Fund to be used for equipment replacement, $944,400 for city hall debt (year 14), $409,440 for gymnasium debt (year 10), $441,940 for fire station debt (year 8), $1,546,600 for public works facility debt (year 7), and $1,168,000 for sports dome debt (year 1). The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $618,600 for park referendum debt service (year 19). The total of all levies would increase by 8.18 %. The total increase in tax capacity levies is 8.4 %. The tax capacity levy increase is sometimes used as the official number by the County and State, although in Edina's case that calculation excludes changes in our park referendum levy. For Edina the total increase of 8.18% is a more useful number because it includes changes in our park referendum levy. Attachments: Resolution 2014 -100 Proposed 2015 budget City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2014-100, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ]�HE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR 2015, AND ESTABLISHING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2015 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, NIINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Page 2 Section 1. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient.to produce the amount as follows: . FOR GENERAL FUND $22,933,958 FOR CONSTRUCTION FUND $1,617,072 FOR ARTS AND CULTURE FUND $20,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS - SERIES 2010A $944,400 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS — SERIES 2005A $ 409,440 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS — SERIES 2007A $ 441,940 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY BONDS $1,546,600 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS — SERIES 2014 $1,168,000 TOTAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY $29,081,410 Section 2. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and cancelling the portion of the levy not required to produce the amount as follows: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 1996A/2005A TOTAL LEVY Section 3. That the preliminary budget for the City of Edina is as follows: TOTAL REVENUES — GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES — GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TOTAL REVENUES — ENTERPRISE FUNDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES — ENTERPRISE FUNDS Approved this 16" day of September 2014. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA , ) $ 618,600 $29,700,010 $51,785,817 $55,413,676 $46,519,903 $39,989,439 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 3, 2013 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of ;.20_ City Clerk 9/11/2014 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Tax Levies Budget Budget 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy $ 21,004,000 $ 21,604,402 $ 21,824,894 $ 22,509,403 $ 22,933,958 General Fund Subtotal 21,004,000 21,604,402 21,824,894 22,509,403 22,933,958 Increase From Prior Year ( %) 1.29% 2.86% 1.02% 3.140/a 1.89% Arts and Culture Fund Levies Arts and culture - - - - 20,000 Arts and Culture Fund Subtotal - - - - 20,000 Increase From Prior Year ( %) Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 949,850 950,800 949,850 947,600 944,400 Equipment Certificates 164,010 67,500 - - - - Gymnasium Debt Service 396,444 411,644 396,444 409,244 409,440 Fire Station Debt Service 431,544 432,744 431,544 441,944 441,940 Public Works Facility Debt Service 1,232,460 1,178,202 1,536,743 1,526,809 1,546,600 Sports Dome NOTE 2 - - - - 1,168,000 Park Bond Market Value Levy 615,837 610,862 615,837 627,800 618,600 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 3,790,145 3,651,752 3,930,418 3,953,397 5,128,980 Increase From Prior Year ( %) -0.65% -3.65% 7.63% 0.58% 29.74% NOTE 2 Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 Construction Fund Subtotal 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 Increase From Prior Year ( %) 5.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 63.00% Total Property Tax Levy $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 $ 26,747,384 $ 27,454,872 $ 29,700,010 Increase From Prior Year ( %) 1.15% 1.79% 1.90% 2.65% 8.18% NOTE 2 Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE i 1.12% 1.86% 1.93% 2.66% 8.40% NOTE 2 NOTE I: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station, public works and sports dome levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from the calculation of "Tax Capacity Levy Increase ". This explains why Tax Capacity Levy Increase does not equal Tout Property Tax Levy Increase. NOTE 2: The City began working on construction and financing for a Sports Dome in fall 2013. Accurate figures were not available when the City adopted the 2014 -2015 budget in fall 2013 so the numbers in that document are different from the numbers shown here. 9/11/2014 CITY OF EDINA Consolidated Proposed Budget 9/11/2014 2012 2013 2014 2015 Actual Actual Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 25,838,422 $ 26,891,756 $ 27,454,872 2.1% $ 29,700,010 8.2% Reductions - - (119,000) NA (123,000) 3.4% Net tax revenue 25,838,422 26,891,756 27,335,872 1.7% 29,577,010 8.2% Tax increments 3,536,935 3,981,938 3,900,000 -2.1% 100,000 -97.4% Franchise fees 815,530 1,891,967 2,070,000 9.4% 2,070,000 0.0% Special assessments 4,975,641 4,884,510 3,321,571 -32.0% 3,444,787 3.7% Licenses and permits 3,155,351 4,150,512 3,302,865 -20.4% 3,855,080 16.7% Intergovernmental 2,269,610 2,998,553 4,574;189 52.5% 2,324,825 -49.2% Charges for services 3,708,482 3,667,612 dtr 4,182;-766; 14.0% 4,019,494 -3.9% Fines and forfeitures 1,195,054 1,109,710 950;000 -14.4% 950,000 0.0% Operating revenue 39,033,106 39,750,384 41,761;604 5.1% 43,726,120 4.7% Investment income 455,163 (174,238) 447,531 - 356.9% 463,956 3.7% Other revenue 4,905,768 1,661,579 568,277 -65.8% 608,448 7.1% Debt issued 5,174,868 8,480,026 2,917,200 -65.6% 3,619,200 24.1% Other financing sources 94,975 62,428 - - 100.0% - NA TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 95,158,905 $ 99,356,737 $ 95,331,875 -4.1% $ 94,758,920 -0.6% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 19,965,670 $ 18,058,543 $ 20,380,412 12.9% $ 14,275,549 -30.0% Communications & tech. 1,041,718 1;1.82,968 1,210,257 2.3% 2,329,574 92.5% Human resources 445,893 905,157 827,487 -8.6% 695,637 -15.9% Finance 717,345 782,101 1,187,619 51.8% 1,216,299 2.4% Public works 20,110,754 21,351,477 22,567,897 5.7% 22,838,932 1.2% Engineering 7,846,862 6,498,786 9,330,550 43.6% 8,689,839 -6.9% Police 10,298,379 10,514,059 11,693,713 11.2% 11,426,748 -2:3% Fire 6,264,920 6,685,619 7,1 19,458 6.5% 7,280,398 2.3% Parks & recreation 10,837,727 12,494,013 12,134,136 -2.9% 14,706,285 21.2% Community development 1,368,336 1,637,815 1,700,031 3.8% 1,742,160 2.5% Debt service. 8,912,394 16,801,634 6,008,988 -64.2% 6,654,894 10.7% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 87,809,998 $ 96,912,172 $ 94,160,548 -2.8% $ 91,856,315 -2.4% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ 10,1 19,193 $ 10,480,175 $ 10,635,139 1.5% $ 10,856,728 2.1% Personal services 28,346,413 30,245,255 32,187,018 6.4% 33,185,730 3.1% Contractual services 13,987,902 14,641,036 14,502,510 -0.9% 14,299,410 -1.4% Commodities 3,586,889 3,676,301 3,799,139 3.3% 3,909,262 2.9% Central services 4,374,753 4,822,787 5,040,600 4.5% 5,154,924 2.3% Equipment 1,308,222 1,043,676 2,138,140 104.9% 1,456,412 -31.9% Capital outlay 12,314,221 9,646,531 14,029,000 45.4% 10,1 19,000 -27.9% Depreciation 3,958,490 4,522,688 4,937,850 9.2% 5,471,750 10.8% Debt service 9,813,915 17,833,723 6,891,152 -61.4% 7,403,099 7.4% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 87,809,998 $ 96,912,172 $ 94,160,548 -2.8% $ 91,856,315 -2.4% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION $ 7,348,907 $ 2,444,565 $ 1,171,327 $ 2,902,605 9/11/2014 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Budget by Fund Type 2014 Budget 2015 Budget 9/11/2014 Governmental Enterprise Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 27,454,872 $ $ 27,454,872 $ 29,700,010 $ $ 29,700,010 Reductions (119,000) (119,000) (123,000) (123,000) Net tax revenue 27,335,872 27,335,872 29,577,010 29,577,010 Tax increments 3,900,000 3,900,000 100,000 100,000 Franchise fees 2,070,000 2,070,000 2,070,000 2,070,000 Special assessments 3,321,571 3,321,571 3,444,787 3,444,787 Licenses and permits 3,302,865 3,302,865 3,855,080 3,855,080 Intergovernmental 4,032,189 542,000 4,574,189 2,208,825 116,000 2,324,825 Charges for services 4,182,766 - 4,182,766 4,019,494 - 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - 950,000 950,000 - 950,000 Operating revenue - 41,761,604 41,761,604 - 43,726,120 43,726,120 Investment income 327,400 120,131 447,531 327,400 136,556 463,956 Other revenue 513,921 54,356 568,277 548,921 59,527 608,448 Transfers 1,015,100 1,505,600 2,520,700 1,065,100 2,481,700 3,546,800 Debt issued 2,917,200 - 2,917,200 3,619,200 - 3,619,200 Other financing sources - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 53,868,884 $ 43,983,691 $ 97,852.575 $ 51,785,817 $ 46,519,903 $ 98,305,720 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration $ 8,116,558 $ 12,263,854 $ 20,380,412 $ 1,769,025 $ 12,506,524 $ 14,275,549 Communication & tech. 1,210,257 1,210,257 2,329,574 2,329,574 Human resources 827,487 827,487 695,637 695,637 Finance 909,509 278,110 1,187,619 929,918 286,381 1,216,299 Public works 9,492,615 13,075,282 22,567,897 9,488,872 13,350,060 22,838,932 Engineering 9,154,550 176,000 9,330,550 8,512,839 177,000 8,689,839 Police 11,264,011 429,702 11,693,713 10,985,340 44 008 11.426,748 Fire 7,119,458 7,119,458 7,280,398 - 7,280,398 Parks & recreation 1,690,639 10,443,497 12,134,136 3,428,319 11,277,966 14,706,285 Community development 1,700,031 - 1,700,031 1,742,160 - 1,742,160 Debt service 6,008,988 - 6,008,988 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers 620,600 1,900,100 2,520,700 1,596,700 1,950,100 3,546,800. TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 58,114,703 $ 38,566,545 $ 96,681,248 $ 55,413,676 $ 39,989,439 $ 95,403,115 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ - $ 10,635,139 $ 10,635,139 $ - $ 10,856,728 $ 10,856,728 Personal services 24,303,226 7,883,792 32,187,018 25,023,800 8,161,936" 33,185,730 Contractual services 5,390,523 9,111,987 14,502,510 4,822,492 9,476,918 14,299,410 Commodities 1,844,514 1,954,625 3,799,139 1,880,062 2,029,200 3,909,262 Central services 3,779,712 1,260,888 5,040,600 3,860,316 1,294,608 5,154,924 Equipment 2,138,140 - 2,138,140 1,456,412 - 1,456,412 Capital outlay 14,029,000 - 14,029,000 10,1 19,000 - 10,1 19,000 Depreciation - 4,937,850 4,937,850 - 5,471,750 5,471,750 Debt service 6,008,988 882,164 6,891,152 6,654,894 748,205 7,403,099 Transfers 620,600 1,900,100 2,520,700 1,596,700 1,950,100 3,546,800 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 58,114,703 $ 38,566,545 $ 96,681,248 $ 55,413,676 $ 39,989,439 $ 95,403,115 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION $ (4,245,819) $ 5,417,146 $ 1,171,327 $ (3,627,859) $ 6,530,464 $ 2,902,605 9/11/2014 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Governmental Fund Budgets 2015 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS FUND BALANCE $ - $ 69,213 $ (32,744) $ - $ 112,446 $ (267.800) $ 20,093 $ 577,785 $ - $ (4,106,852) $ (3,627,859) 911 112 01 4 Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACs. CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 22,933,958 $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 5,128,980 $ - $ 1,617,072 $ 29,700,010 Reductions (123,000) (123,000) Net tax revenue 22,810,958 20,000 5,128,980 1,617,072 29,577,010 Tax Increments - 100,000 - - - _ _ _ _ - 100,000 Franchise fees 770,000 - 1,200,000 - - - - - - 100.000 2,070,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - 2,083,699 - 1,361.088 3,444,787 Ucenses and permits 3,830,080 - - - _ _ - 25,000 3,855,080 Intergovernmental 1,113,500 - 100,000 115,325 - - - - 880,000 2,208,825 Charges for services 3,969,494 - - - - - - - - - 50,000 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - - - - - _ _ _ - 950,000 Investment income 150,000 94,000 - 300 200 - 20,000 - 62,900 327,400 Other revenue 461,100 - - - 57,821 7,000 23,000 - - - 548,921 Transfers 765,100 - - - - - - - - 300,000 1,065,100 Debt Issued - - - - - - _ _ - - 3,619,200 3,619,200 Other f -Ing sources - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 34,820,232 $ 194,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 100.000 $ 173,446 $ 7,200 $ 43,000 $ 7,232,679 $ - $ 8,015,260 $ 51,785,817 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 1,619,238 $ 124,787 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 1,769,025 Communication & tech. 1,040,674 - - - - _ _ _ _ 1,288,900 2,329,574 Human resources 695,637 - - - - _ _ _ _ - 695,637 Finance 904,918 - - - - - _ _ - 25,000 929,918 Public works 8,459.610 - - _ _ _ - 1,029,262 9,488,872 Engineering 1,735,095 - 1,232,744 - - - - - - 5,545,000 8,512,839 Police 10,357,415 - - - 61,000 - - - - 566,925 10,985,340 Fire 7,007,398 - - - - - _ _ - 273,000 7,280.398 Parks & recreation 1,388,087 - - - 275,000 22,907 - - 1,742,325 3,428.319 Community developmrm 1.6 12,160 - - 100,000 - - - - - 30,000 - 1,742.160 Debt service - - - - _ _ - 6,654.894 - - 6,654.894 Transfers 1,596,700 1,596,700 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820.232 $ 124,787 $ 1,232,744 $ 100,000 $ 61,000 $ 275,000 $ 22,907 $ 6,654,894 $ - $ 12,122,112 $ 55,413,676 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $ 24,798,774 $ 118,467 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,559 $ - 25,023,800 Contractual services 4,469,594 6,120 23,000 100,000 56,000 - 21,057 - - 146,721 4,822,492 Commodores - 1,773,292 200 28,000 - SAW - 1,850 - - 71.720 1,880,062 Central services 3,778,572 - 81,744 - - - _ _ _ - 3,860,316 Equipment - - - - - - - - - 1,456,412 1,456,412 Capital outlay - - 1,100,000 - - 275,000 - - - 8,744,000 10,119,000 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - - 6,654,894 Transfers 1,596,700 1,596,700 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820,232 $ 124,787 $ 1,232,744 $ 100,000 $ 61,000 $ 275,000 $ 22.907 $ 6,654,894 $ - $ 12,122,112 $ 55,413,676 CHANGEIN FUND BALANCE $ - $ 69,213 $ (32,744) $ - $ 112,446 $ (267.800) $ 20,093 $ 577,785 $ - $ (4,106,852) $ (3,627,859) 911 112 01 4 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Enterprise Fund Budgets 2015 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS 9/11/2014 Aquatic Golf Sports Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN I Operating revenues $ 19.433,473 $ 14,367,1 18 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,916,400 $ 2,017,519 $ 381,860 $ 445,950 $ 1,354,800 $ 786,000 $ 43,726,120 Intergovernmental 116,000 - - - - 116.000 Investment income 96,556 15,000 25,000 136,556 Other revenue 56,527 3,000 - - 59,527 Transfers - 1,540,000 360,000 285.000 264,700 32,000 2,481,700 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 19,702,556 $ 14,367,118 $ 1.023,000 $ 5,456,400 $ 2,377,519 $ 381,860 $ 733,950 $ 1,634,500 $ 843,000 $ 46,519,903 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ - $ 12,506,524 $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 12,506,524 Finance 286,381 - 286,381 Public works 13,350,060 .13,350,060 Engineering 177,000 177,000 Police 441,408 441,408 Pants and recreation - 93 &625 4,046,382 2,423,956 554,090 683,306 1,616,747 1,014,860 11,277,966 Transfers 100.000 1,850,100 1.950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625 $ 4,046,382 $ 2,423,956 $ 554,090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,989,439 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ - $ 10.198,628 $ 46,000 $ 385,100 $ 85,000 $ $ 23,000 $ 105,000 $ 14,000 $ 10.856.728 Personal services 1,732,897 1,419,298 371,593 1,879,494 885,513 54,440 449.431 745,581 623,683 8,161,930 Contractual services 6,723,540 522,928 162.300 642300 612,750 171,650 101,175 362650 177,625 9,476,918 Commodities 999,500 63,150 89,650 436,900 96,950 3,000 48.300 183.450 108,300 2,029,200 Central services 70 &588 227.520 27,108 132,588 5 8,836 35,400 53,316 51,252 1,294,608 Depreciation 3,487,500 75,000 236,500 570,000 545,000 325,000 26,000 166.750 40,000 5,471,750 Interest 602,824 5,474 - 139,907 - - 748,205 Transfers 100.000 1,850,100 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14.354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625 $ 4,046,382 $ 2423,956 $ 554,090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014.860 $ 39.989,439 CHANGE IN NET POSITION $ 5.347,707 $ 10,494 $ 84,375 $ 1,410.018 $ (46,437) $ (172230) $ 50,644 $ 17,753 $ (171.860) $ 6.530.464 9/11/2014 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. B. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -95 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information'/ Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by ,a, resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -95 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -95 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens, WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Administration Department: Snuffy's Malt Shop Breakfast For 100 people Edina Park Department: EHS Baseball Association $6,200.00 Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Prevention Fund $613.00 Dated: September 2, 2014 Wooddale/Valley View Work Shop 10/4/2014 Braemar Field 1 Dugout Fence Renovation Night to Unite Expenses Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN). SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached. and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this — day of City Clerk To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: September 16, 2014 Subject: Selection of Grandview Development Partner Action Requested: If Vu \�RBFBOg Agenda Item #k VIII. C. Action El Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Name a potential development partner for the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue in the Grandview District and authorize staff to negotiate terms of the partnership for final Council approval. Information / Background: Ten teams of development professionals submitted responses to the City's Request for Interest (RFI) issued in June 2014. All the responses are posted at www.edinamn.gov /grandview. This response followed extensive outreach to the urban planning and real estate development communities. The RFI packet was sent to more than 60 local professionals via U.S. Mail and e-mail. Print and internet ads were placed in local and national trade journals. The RFI was also posted to the websites of Urban Land Institute MN, American Planning Association MN and MN Commercial Association of Real Estate (MNCAR). The RFI document was informed by the work of the Community Advisory Team which met from June 2013 to March 2014 and finalized by staff. Issuance of the RFI was authorized by the City Council on June 17, 2014 and marked another step toward implementing the vision adopted in the 2012 Grandview Development Framework Narrowing the field An ad -hoc committee of City staff representing Administration, Community Development, Economic Development, Parks & Recreation and Engineering reviewed all ten responses and narrowed the field to four teams. The staff evaluation was based on eleven measures that summarize the objectives of the RFI: 1) Does the team possess necessary qualifications to co- develop the site with a mixed -use project consisting of public and private components in a manner that responds to the GrandView Development Framework using extensive public engagement? 2) Does the team have the capacity to arrange financing and complete the project? 3) Have members of the team successfully completed projects in Edina? 4) Does the statement reflect a sincere understanding of the Grandview 7 Guiding Principles? City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 September 16, 2014 Page 2 -5) Does the statement demonstrate alignment with the GrandView Development Framework? 6) . Has the team demonstrated strong.examples of publiciprivate projects or projects with civic/community uses? 7) Has the team demonstrated examples where - extensive public engagement occurred? „ 8) Does the statement recognize the multiple modes of transportation that surround the site and show willingness to achieve a high degree of walkability? 9) Has the team demonstrated strong examples of " place making "? 10) Has the developer historically retained long -term ownership of the property and demonstrated responsible stewardship of completed projects? 1 1) Has the team submitted a work plan that realistically addresses the needs and time requirements? Presentations by Finalists Four teams of potential development partners presented their qualifications and were interviewed by the City Council members at the September 2nd, 2014 Work Session. These teams are: • Doran Companies with ESG Architects and Westwood Professional Services • Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group ,witli`Opus, Reynolds Urban Design and Confluence • Greco, LLC with BKV Architects and Frana Companies • Kraus- Anderson Realty with ESG Architects and Melrose Company Selection of Preferred Development Partner The City Council is scheduled to discuss their preferences at the September 16, 2014 Work Session. It is anticipated that the Council will identify a preferred partner who will be capable of working collaboratively, with the City to achieve a mixed -use project that includes synergistic public and private elements'that meets the needs of the community and is successful in the marketplace. Next steps After identification of the preferred partner, numerous steps are anticipated to arrive at a buildable concept: • a contract will be negotiated to clarify the responsibilities of each party, • significant research and extensive community input is then anticipated to arrive at two or more feasible development alternatives for the site, • after community review, the City Council is anticipated to identify the preferred alternative in mid - 2015, • development partner will then be responsible for securing financing and approvals for the private component while the City will be responsible for securing the public component, • Finally, construction will occur, possible in multiple phases. Attachments: June 2014 RFI; September 2, 2014 presentations by finalists; follow up information received from Doran, Greco, & Frauenshuh; related resident correspondence ti City of Edina, Minnesota e e o Grandview Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner The City of Edina has a rich history of innovative developments that have become national models for public /private partnerships. We are looking for a development partner to collaborate with us to create Edina's next great neighborhood amenity. Objective The City of Edina is seeking a partner with real estate development expertise and experience to collaborate in implementing the GrandView District Development Framework. As Phase I in the implementation process, this partner will work with the City to determine public and private uses on a vacant 3.3 -acre parcel (the former Public Works site) in the center of the District and then potentially design and construct the structure(s) that house those uses. The School Bus Garage at 5220 Eden Avenue is potentially Phase 2 in the redevelopment process. This parcel is wholly owned by Edina Independent School District 273. Any redevelopment planning for this parcel will take place in partnership with District 273 in a separate process unrelated to this Request for Interest. It is important to the City that all sites be developed in a manner that innovatively responds to the needs of the community and is successful in the marketplace. Background In 2010, the City initiated a community-based small area guide plan process for the GrandView District, led by residents, business and property owners, including a volunteer team of architects, landscape architects, and urban planners (all Edina residents). The innovative, collaborative and intensive process (10 meetings in 20 days) resulted in the unanimous approval of seven Guiding Principles for redevelopment of the GrandView District GrandView Guiding Principles 1. Leverage publicly -owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. 2. Enhance the District's economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. 4. Design for the present and future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life- filled place. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina's innovative development heritage. In April of 2012, with the help of a $100,000 Met Council Livable Communities grant, the City completed the second citizen -led phase of the process resulting in the unanimous City Council adoption of the GrandView District Development Framework. The Framework (available at www.edinamn.gov) provides a vision for how to bring the Guiding Principles to life. In the GrandView District, the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, add value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. This amenity, the GrandView Commons, is envisioned to include a community building, public green, and new street (GrandView Crossing). Additional elements potentially envisioned for the site include a Metro Transit park and ride and possibly multi - family housing. In keeping with the spirit of the Framework, all uses must provide for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and adhere to best practices with regard to environmental sustainability. In addition, development must consider and should preserve future transit use of the adjoining rail line. Additional visions for the site and the district is found in the Framework. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 2 Collaborative Process The City anticipates a multi -stage process to collaborate with a potential Development Partner to achieve the vision outlined for the former Public Works site in the Framework. Partner Selection--- Outcome: City The City will review letters of interest and select prospective partners to announces partner interview. After conducting interviews on September 2, 2014, the City will on September 16, select a "tentative" Development Partner. 2014. Stage 2: Process Refinement 7 Outcome: Parties The City and the Development Partner will work together to create a enter into a formal transparent and engaging process to identify feasible alternatives to re -use and agreement to redevelop the vacant site. This process will include extensive public input, execute the process including City commissions, stakeholder groups, neighbors and the general on November 18, public. Additional planning/market studies and obligations of each party will be 2014. identified. Milestones and deadlines will be established. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 'Outcome: Stage - Development The Development Partner and the City will collaborate to generate alternative Development scenarios for development that align with the goals of the Framework and the Partner will deliver needs of the community and the marketplace. Each scenario will demonstrate 2-4 alternatives for all aspects of project feasibility, including but not limited to: the re -use of the site • General development plan that indicates public and private uses, by March 31, 2015. approximate building size and height, outdoor open spaces, circulation These alternatives patterns within and adjacent to the site and any off -site infrastructure will be forwarded to requirements; City Council on • Economic model / pro -forma that demonstrates the financial feasibility April 7, 2015. including revenues and expenses for both capital construction and long -term operations; and • Phasing plan that summarizes the timing and sequencing of the public and private elements at the site. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 Oome: iNulmmary tc provided to Council on May 19, 2015. Stage 4: Public Eval,uation -of Alternatives I I I Each of the alternative scenarios will be made available to the public for evaluation and feedback Public input and opinions will be collected and summarized to help inform the City Council. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 Outcome: City ._ Scenario -Preferred The City Council will determine which of the alternative scenarios, if any, is in selects preferred the best interests of the community. After selection, the City and the scenario on June 2, Development Partner will enter into an exclusive partnership and negotiate full 2015 and authorizes terms of a Redevelopment Agreement under which the preferred scenario will execution with the be executed. Development Partner. While the City expects this process to result in a feasible development scenario, other approaches to development planning are encouraged and will be considered as part of the Letter of Interest. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 3 Submission Requirements Interested entities (whether an individual, company, or team) should submit a Letter of Interest that includes the following information: 1) Name, mailing address, telephone number,and email address of the primary contact person; 2) The names and professional background's .,of all team members who are integral to the project; 3) A general statement of why the team is interested in this opportunity, "including the team perspective of the community vision outlined in, the Grandview Development Framework and preliminary thoughts on '.how .development of the site can serve .as a- catalyst for private development of the surrounding. parts of the District; 1., 4) Three examples of'. . experiences with the one or more of the following attributes: civic /community uses, mixture of public and private uses, public /private partnerships, multi - modal transportation elements, environmental sustainability or innovate project financing; 5) Two examples of projects shaped with extensive public input; 6) Preliminary work plan that outlines the critical elements and milestones anticipated when working.with the City to advance from ."vision" to "reality"; and 7) Any other information that is critical to:the City's ability to evaluate the merits of the team. Respondents are encouraged to be thorough, yet concise. References to online project examples are encouraged. Letters of Interest must be limited to 10- pages. Submission is due by 4:30pm on Monday, August 11, 2014. The Letter of Interest must be submitted in electronic format with 10 printed hard copies delivered to: City of Edina 4801 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager bneuendorfe.edinamn.gov Selection All complete submittals received prior to the deadline will be evaluated by an ad -hoc selection team comprised of City staff Likely to be engaged in the development planning process. Submittals will be evaluated on past experience, professional capabilities and ability to collaboratively work in partnership. with�the City to successfully create innovative development alternatives for the site. The City will ,determine which responders, if any, will be invited to interview. Selected responders will be invited to give in- person presentations to the City Council on Tuesday September 2, 2014 at 5:00 PM. Based on the Letter of Interest and in- person interviews, the City Council anticipates selecting a "tentative development partner" to explore the feasible alternatives for the site on September 16, 2014. Development planning is anticipated to begin immediately thereafter. City of Edina, Minnesota June 25; 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 4 Term_ s , This is a request for Letters of Interest and in no way obligates the responder to enter into a relationship with the City. Nor does this request obligate the City to enter into a relationship with any entity that responds, nor does it limit or restrict the City's right to enter into a relationship with any entity that does not respond to this request. In its sole discretion, the City may pursue discussions with one or more entities responding to this request, or none at all. The City further reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to cancel this Request for Letters of Interest at any time for any reason. All costs associated with responding to this request will be solely at the responder's expense: Additional Information In addition to the Development Framework,. the City has commissioned several studies that may inform the response to this Request for Interest. These documents include: environmental studies, Community Facility Inventory, Edina Resident Survey and preliminary traffic and underground infrastructure studies. A finding of TIF eligibility was also completed for the site. These documents are available at www.edinamn.gov /grandview. Question's about this Request for Interest can be directed to Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager at"952- 826 -0407 or bneuendorf(cDedinamn.gov. e r: . .!.�SICYVU�nN'r'c• City of Edina, Minnesota June 25, 2014 RFI for Development Partner Page 5 r This page intentionally left blank. D 0 Pw.,,,A N C O M P A N I E S Edina Grandview Phase Redevelopment IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES �o2!AN September 2, 2014 To: The Edina Community From: Kelly Doran & the Doran Development Team Re: GrandView: Imagine the Possibilities Thank you for the opportunity to work with City of Edina leaders and community members to explore re- development possibilities for the GrandView neighborhood. On the following pages of this booklet we have provided a visual presentation of possible uses and design elements for the GrandView Phase I project. These pages imagine a vibrant and interactive community of private multi - family residential with a public use building situated among an iconic sculpture garden and plentiful natural green spaces —all accessible by pedestrian friendly walkways and diverse modes of transportation. Our goal in presenting these visions is not to suggest this is what shall be, but rather as a glimpse of our team's creative abilities. Indeed, our team has a long tradition of working with city leaders and citizen advisory groups to bring reality to visions that have evolved from community collaborations. Another strength we would bring to the GrandView project is the Doran Companies ability to perform at all levels of the development process. Our company is truly local and has the capacity to design, finance, construct, own and manage developments without having to seek assistance from corporate partners or from national real estate investors. If Doran Companies is chosen to work with the City of Edina on the GrandView neighborhood re- development, we assure you we can offer the most experienced team to guide this project through the due diligence process to assure the creation of a memorable space among a distinguished and proud community. Sincerely, c_ Kelly Doran, Principal Doran Companies 7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200 1 Bloomington, MN 55439 1 952288.2000 1 Far. 952.288.2001 1 www. DoranCompanies.com View from Our Lady of Grace athletic fields looking North 2 1 Doran Companies 12 -story and 7 -story residential mid -rise buildings over 2 levels of parking and 3 -level townhomes View from Our Lady of Grace athletic fields looking North Doran Companies 1 3 View from Our Lady of Grace athletic fields looking North 4 1 Doran Companies JL ' �14 This aerial view demonstrates how a mid -rise concept would allow for the greatest possible safe and comfortable pedestrian and bike connections to, from and through the Grandview development. While the pictured community building, greenway paths, civic plazas, and art plaza /sculpture garden are possible with all three concepts, the mid -rise alternative would allow for maximum open, green space and civic uses. Doran Companies 1 5 JIF-lo I� i MMEW how r A green plaza sculpture garden concept on a cover over the RR tracks and Brookside Avenue adds an exciting green and artistic dimension with unlimited potential to become a destination for community bicyclists and pedestrians, in addition to a great sense of pride for the City of Edina. 6 1 Doran Companies Wr 771- Doran Companies 1 7 0 8 1 Doran Companies 11 OWOM The expansive walkway concept with green and artistic amenities would create a welcoming space that would also promote interaction between the adjacent public and private buildings. �y t; w � Doran Companies 1 9 f .. Mok 10 1 Doran Companies ,r .i ' f As Providing the greatest amount of public space is essential to maximizing use for public events such as outdoor community concerts, theatre, civic receptions and school events such as proms and graduation ceremonies. i� Doran Companies 111 This aerial view demonstrates how the promenade above the RR tracks and Brookside Avenue would intersect with the planned new bridge and Grandview Crossing to provide a pedestrian and bicycle connection over Highway 10C to City Hall. PPIP w IL � r • .i��r: � 4 - 1 � .11l1A i 12 1 Doran Companies IM winy I� •- 4.... I 1 il; ! 1111IRK .. t u L�; i OEM _ 1 A continuous public space serving as a circular walkway around the entire development with intervals that expand to signature elements such as a sculpture garden, a promenade of trees, gardens, fountains and welcoming public and private structures is sure to provide a unique identity for the Grandview neighborhood and the City of Edina. Doran Companip� 113 -. .rte ----�- . -_ IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES Contact Information Kelly Doran Office: 952.288.2000 Kellya,DoranCompanies.com DOR/A N Bloomington, ingto y Road. Suite 200 /-1I l Bloomington. MN 55439 C 0 Ni P A N I L S www.DoranCompanies.com a a DORAN C O M P A N I E S Grandview Phase I Redevelopment Parking Analysis Assumes a two -level parking structure covering approximately 2.5 acres of the site. 2 These numbers are not based upon the Edina zoning code, but use practical industry standards . m ® �. ..- .... LOW, Office 500 4 6 125,000 83,000 Medita9 5.00 6 8:- i :85;00,01 62500 Retail 500 4 5 125,000 100,000 Retail W /Restaurants 500' 6 8 83;00® (2;500 Residential (Apt and/or Condo) 500 1.5 2 333,000 250,000 Assumes a two -level parking structure covering approximately 2.5 acres of the site. 2 These numbers are not based upon the Edina zoning code, but use practical industry standards This page intentionally left blank. pok OPUS ©FRAUGNSI�Uli Reynolds THE OPUS OROUP canm:nu�u�llble 6:qup p e 5 I g n GrandView District PHASE 1 REDEVELOPMENT .L OPUS ®O MFRAUENSHUH R e y n o l d s THE OPUS GROUP CRM"EVAC GrOW D es i q n why our tears Benchmark Projects experience why our tears °j gar a: i Y /N OPUS' ©rRAVENSwuH Reynolds Benchmark Project - Frauenshuh THE OPUS GROUP �°'"^""'' ""' �"°'� D e s i g n r i experience ! why rnir tean1 0: 01'US ©FRAUENSHUH Reynolds Benchmark Project — Opus LTHE OPUS GROUP E�,qH,� Rt)I ttl)1e t:,o,,� i l ` i � .� f M green path Why OLIF team 4 im> Green Braided Fingers GathefirKjPlxe� L L-111 Clive Town Center Location Clive, A iii C Reynold OPUS' © FRAUENSHUH b.. Benchmark Project - Reynolds Urban Design THL OPUS GROUP CW.."W" Rut i E"I QVW D e s q n experience path why our team t OPUS' �rRAUENSHUH Reynolds Benchmark Project - Confluence THE OPUS GROUP Cpnm WM Rul bU {C Group D e s i q n r experience green p! iii I OPUS 51 Cvn.,mal R e n o l d FRAUENSHUH ban Y THE OPUS GROUP RCaI E)Ult Uuup D e s i q n • Best Practice why our team experience green i .),] t1 why our team We Take a Best Practice Approach to Sustainability • Implement a Sustainable Design Charrette • Create holistic walkable neighborhoods • Develop and re- purpose in -fill sites • Maximize building performance • Minimize environmental impact • Sustainability experts involved through all project phases • Sustainable design features & building practices in every project • Align with client's ideologies, budget & building goals • Over 15 million Sq. Ft. LEED certified space completed Opus p FRAULNSHUH Re y n olds Best Practice THE OPUS GROUP commerclarKey tuuewwp D e s l❑ n w experience green path it why our team t t t • Project Team • Guiding Principles _ • Resources '� • Work Plan k • Public Participation It t • Site Analysis ~j ,�.�'. . ?i.` • Feasibility Analysis j Creating Place � 1 Iw 1 OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Reynolds THE OPUS GROUP canes," Rol twta Group D e s i q n David Frauenshuh '! Frauenshuh r CEO and Founder S ff Dean Williamson Frauenshuh President David Anderson Frauenshuh Senior Vice President , e!t 'r Dennis Reynolds. T Terry Minarek rte► k � Confluent Principa p vid.Me Company President Matthew Opus Development Company Senior Director ` Dean Newir� Opus AE Group Sen r Vice President experience gree • Leverage publicly -owned parcels • Meet the needs of businesses and residents • Turn barriers into opportunities • Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive • Organize parking; provide convenience path why our team s Z E 4 • Improve movement for all ages; C facilitate multiple modes of C movement _,,�'' C --� # C • Identity and unique sense of place; be B sustainable and innovative C C OPUS© FRAUENSHUH Rye y n o l d s C THE OPUS GROUP Ca (W ReA Efate Graq D e s i q n Guiding Principles i ' experience 1 i i i green T*wcm EDINA Path Reynolds u, bun Design OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Reynolds urban THE OPUS GROUP C—EW Real (Mate Group D e s i q n ©FRAUENSHUH (�cW Real EvAt Cc q COnFLUEnCE why our team OneTeam One Objective . � I OPUS -- ;,, •�G}U.`. YOUNG EN • THE OPUS GROUPS ..'�• i -, ,"`3r'�'� IWAOWa. Reynolds u, bun Design OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Reynolds urban THE OPUS GROUP C—EW Real (Mate Group D e s i q n ©FRAUENSHUH (�cW Real EvAt Cc q COnFLUEnCE why our team OneTeam One Objective . � I expenence green Experience and expertise: Frauenshuh • Master Developer • Project Feasibility Analysis • Real Estate Investment & Finance • Leasing & Marketing • Asset & Property Management Re n o I d =, OPUS © FRAUFASHUH b— THE OPUS GROUP � LrwP D C S i q n path why our team h Resources C experience yretr; Experience and expertise: The Opus Group • Development • Finance • Sales / Leasing • Interior Design • Architecture • Engineering • Construction / Project Management i i i i i Reynolds OPUS [a,'.RAUENSHUH urban THE OPVS GROUP off w," 4ut,C up D e s i q n path why our team S I ► t J",' 'No Resources experience green Experience and expertise: Reynolds Urban Design • Team Master Planner • Urban Design • Design Process Facilitation • Strategic Planning Concepts /\ OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Reynolds „ „, .HOU, «.�w a�� w.���, D e s i g n path Miy our team i C C Resources I; experience urt:en path why our team Experience and expertise: Confluence • Public Facilitation • Public Space Programming • Landscape Architecture • Public Space Design a Resources experience Start End green Stage 1: Partner Selection 9/2/14 9/16/14 Stage 2: Process Refinement 9/16/14 11/18/14 ja path why our teani lA Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May June Stage 2 A �16 Public Discovery Interactive Session Stage 3: Alternative Development 11/19/14 3/31/15 C Stage 4: Public Evaluation of Alternatives 4/8/15 5/19/15 1 ® C Stage 5: Selection of Preferred Scenario 5/20/15 6/2/15 Staje50 t! i•• Development Partner Implementation 6/3/15 Completion Summary Provided City Selects preferred LEGEND O City announces development partner on September 16'", 2014 Master Developer Process Activities Milestones Process Steps OPUS fil FRAUENSHUH Reynold s IHE OPUS GROUP CanmmUal"r•l I UA, G•_P D e s i q n Preliminary Work Plan Parties enter into a formal Development Partner will deliver Summary Provided City Selects preferred agreement to execute the 2 -4 alternatives for the re -use of to City Council on scenario on June 2, 2015 process on November 18, the site by March 31, 2015. These May 19, 2015 and authorizes execution 2014 alternatives will be delivered to with the Development the City Council on April 7, 2015 Partner mummmmo, Stage 2 Stage 5 ` Deliverables Defiverables Deliverables Deliverables • Process creation Market and Use • Presentation of • Scenario evaluation • Community engagement assessment scenarios for public and selection by City plan • Generation of alternative input /feedback Council • Establish sub - milestones development & phasing • Collection and • Proceed to and production schedule scenarios summary of Redevelopment • Economic input /feedback Agreement for I model /protorma preferred scenario Discovery Session A Discovery • Public needs input Session 8 • Use & Programming • Confirmation potential of public • Interactive Session - concepts and 1 Touchpad system uses t OPUS fil FRAUENSHUH Reynold s IHE OPUS GROUP CanmmUal"r•l I UA, G•_P D e s i q n Preliminary Work Plan OPUS THE OPUS GROUP F ,'•�. © FRAUENSHUH Reynolds rban Comr MIW Real Eflale Group D e s i q n why our team H F APO, r,►ogIS. "'O"I i w Public Participation Together we will explore and discover the best strategic development plan by... Gathering FACTS Documenting GOALS Understanding market NEEDS Creating CONCEPTS OPUS THE OPUS GROUP ©FRAUENSHUH Rurban olds C« '" 01.4 cu.« f".V D e s i g n why our team Sketch /Process experience green path why our team Identifying and expanding everyone`s understanding of the layers of neighborhood wide systems that will create a framework for development. M ♦ OPUS Reynolds r� ©�RAUENSHUH >.� 7NE OPUS GROVP D e s i g n Understanding Neighborhood Systems experience I-ireerl path f N,1l 1.\ \Ill II .... •` � b r+n.a uu 9r.nr +. o••r „� :N.a. L,•pr land Gila haw n1 p/.Irm. ,,._.......,,.,�... ,,, WN YI +nI •n 4Alra 4m i•..R Cluny "Yrogy. N•yabi,ban +Aa 130 aaq 19.9lb 96.1t 99.aa OM9w�IWJer SquNa o.Nga Mlwmeb.n: la �.u�op{Wi.+wanq k,µ ^w i1 rblaal OVrauan {BYO Otlari•'U>va1A .75 COq Sqr� ab•A+aN Ym L, Iii• �� C.ra:.c�m SOnUW IOV sswc 9s.n l9lJ lb�+lwYCN. t16 C9U W11 aw• *... w..a.. WwNn• aaaaana O9ra �JaW 19p m,'.wry.'sv aq1 lzo.wa Gv:v S..e n rco'aF 16]Ggp SG FI .• u. ..•rAa.9 [:w u.pae na....a.. Goru4wYV pr,9y 19 :+.YII.+ DEVELOPWNT CMIS qy 11 it llar 0rara N.Y.•uY S +a....ga�e• wr L..r+. wr swN �•� 1216A in.9L r _me.w.a so bale a -1 rwWOO. +'w/a'•�rw •bw. i . iw L,Sn• I cnN ana CU. ev�.aVe6Jn Coa+ 9i •Y 00 ;P1 1t LaSgOO 91i].DO .+ale 1•m CUV.aiu I Ow.a911�wpY Marw;:la... a T•l i Oy]S a S4+JAr;a•J Prbq ✓A ON.D _ 5 Sa•Wpm(OJAeq are PeaAaq, p+[w[11W�r•Yw"s•�:i+.[Na,. Nw[i sway «tb..rw6..an. 017.01 aM i ], EWTYNVESTEV 14 tra L[�.a'•1 6wl Lmecbnm 0 MOL +w .. a a.Y Z: i �erN JGweA A: >]6q 1R rtd00,0001 0 (011 v1r OOgL __. T - -' _ —ju. ` 1ar =e Ya- WN NFL e uaa.bP,r<n r•ae ]0.W1 wy.n sAa a.aa..rrn T..L 9AJ fOtin4 r�� SAG WAC 1G&M OL27 c..'e•r 4..-•�, ...:an Iw a'ri I. 1ua.l9,ia �a i ..^nlns•rcl NIAG Wr uvn. Fn.[wa T4a4a61Y 4a +.a [ • . s• .aa A,w, ' IM Sin I• Ib,abr{ ]DOX 2Wti wYw pn Yr' • Nr 416r♦ Nan S,L.• �9M +Ma.tYr 1 wlLa��ra•ran- 4s6a•6•'aN'a rArLIL [Y Tr Wlbta' N b++•+'•I'1na[ -q+ �1 AC•u1N:Ya1L ,panNinp 90\ �,)a•,)10 N56 1 +�. rAavww M09ga.aa Ti. a.7L11 WNVt1na iJ ALE 0.w.M.W4. )0Y. i6lmPaa,g A.w{U .1{80 g6.000 90 as w�a 4alY[p.•taiM��rNpg4 u is WIwl.+a ru 1. t Lagal 50,000 W ai I • G•arw.JAl,awiw iw lu un�• W rna.+a ,m+a P,n: +•uan le +.r...'a....r, Apn.wr alcr Is.wL w.. Oru9awYr+19•..- r+r. pw Ir vN+N wa uar+ �. . Sai iwanq! GaNa•ay.N OL.000 9.., 4aRar« /Laaria «lia Iu LJI•N L LXV+. t9 Saa+r• .0 WwV t F4vJnVbMa.• �w4.1 1500 r, a97 sqq M fL i] .I i '. OlaYdrY[wY�.9w ViRi. LM VAI+ ♦L w :! VrMLiq F.epw•a• b 99.811 • rlyy11]Nlr «IIJI'NUaW.. WN YI +nI •n 4Alra 4m i•..R Cluny "Yrogy. N•yabi,ban +Aa 130 aaq 19.9lb 96.1t 99.aa OM9w�IWJer Wad.. ".a W. 101,14 la �.u�op{Wi.+wanq k,µ ^w i1 3+1,051 {BYO I +••w'••WN+r ab•A+aN Ym L, Iii• �� n ,.rlr,nwr.a« sswc 9s.n aw• *... w..a.. WwNn• aaaaana 0�� m,'.wry.'sv aq1 lzo.wa f6w .• u. ..•rAa.9 [:w u.pae na....a.. wNYA'a —.A,, 19 :+.YII.+ o qy 11 it llar 0rara N.Y.•uY S +a....ga�e• wr L..r+. wr swN R6'ria.[1 u.nn..d 1216A 93.10 a -1 rwWOO. +'w/a'•�rw •bw. i . iw L,Sn• jNa .q r�a,WvcW�pai4llJ1 aa1 '47.1/6 9[0.01 I Ow.a911�wpY Marw;:la... . Y'+YN +•yV'a i p+[w[11W�r•Yw"s•�:i+.[Na,. Nw[i sway «tb..rw6..an. MY++. �'a .. • �.. �. , .. �. aM i ], EWTYNVESTEV 14 tra L[�.a'•1 �f� N prWF9aMWar A�.mm +w .. a a.Y Z: N brr/ %— pw.Gly wLU m0 YWrryFwNrW Wa LylYwall ]0.W1 wy.n ri 1•arOrrL9anw. w.•1,Yata aa�a t V•raN.YFaOW ro lad• Up1Yw• ql V-."isaa rw 1333 uplba— Ywn tL.Oay. .0.001 r+Yw wyaai A �+ +�wNaana tl law+ Wr uvn. Fn.[wa T4a4a61Y Uwdwq kapan•6 h6•I.r,ry FaNy NM OrOL9•L +YUrY r.uw ]DOX 2Wti wYw pn Yr' I.,ar. :a•s•n •ar•v.�a+.b{ IM l]LIS Sw ].ILrA +Ma.tYr N b++•+'•I'1na[ -q+ Y'w 1'ILIS 1�41a+,6 PrmanrJ La]/1 Aro InN•.ii Oar 97a.MZ 471 4,75% 9100.12 I b Cn,w. +s rwfa /uar Nns WM[b5rb] T.— Amn.rauc^ Iq Is fr cranm lWU, u a9a -. tYa 3'13..5 wa rpyrC ww lan.,a Yn Itw16 n I..wNrr•Nw twa snna IM uwn6 c..,.r<•.r ,�w+... aw Nw v'•1• nW rnalns i w'•er A...- ..•a�a[.: N• +rs'IS IM laoln6i �r Sample Schedule It why our team C , IAN Two Ww” r r� 1� /\ OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Rb y n olds I` THE OPUS GROUP Ccsmr fcw 9.4 EUM. Group D e s i q n Feasibility Analysis !+i 1 Two Ww” r r� 1� /\ OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Rb y n olds I` THE OPUS GROUP Ccsmr fcw 9.4 EUM. Group D e s i q n Feasibility Analysis !+i r experience rlit_ F low EAST VILLAGE MARKET DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Designer Confluence Location Des Moines, A gre(:�l I .4 path Why our team e C% OPUS y n o l d s M FRAUENSHUH Rurban Tm OPUS amm comm," mad F"a Grow D e s i q n DP,S Moines River Creating Place experience greet i path why our team in Designer ' - •' � Confluence Location i Gladstone, MO OPUS FRAUGNSHUH Reynolds THE OPUS GROUP CommercW Aral tu.0 Group Des i q n Creating Place C v " ' path why our team o. I High Street Mixed i Designer Reynolds Urban Design I f / F / f � • 1 f lot t 1 A. A, Ff t f North Kansas City Designer Reynolds Urban Design OPUS FRAUENSHUH Rb y n o I d s THE OPUS GROUP ®Camm�c4l NeY kiLtf Coup D e s i g n Creating Place experience green path Birmingham Entertainment District Designer Reynolds Urban Design w t '■�. _ .t r.,. 412— AWL MMMMMFW 1 M�L \ I PON OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Reynold s THE OPUS GROUP Conm.NtW 4.I Eam. c.—W D e s i g n Why our teem C C f� ed Kansas City Power and Light District Designer Reynolds Urban Design — Creating Place Cincinnati The Banks Designer Reynolds Urban Design Cr Court Avenue Entertainment District Designer Reynolds Urban Design J., -7 4- ices why our team rck cr 4 Hoboken Designer Reynolds Urban Design I� ynolds QN OPUS' IRFRAUENSHUH Re utban THE OPUS GROUP D e s i q n Creating Place 4w 1 1w M experience green pats OPUS © FRAUENSHUH Reynold s THE OPUS GROUP romme W Real Wait Gr P D e s i q n s Your Partner why our team experience , green Your Ideal Development Partner path Identify Community Needs- we propose an interactive public discovery and communication process Walkable Community- Creating connections within the district will further enhance the vitality and energy of the neighborhood Value Driven Development Solution- Requires an understanding of existing conditions, market needs, it's place in the overall environment, and it's contribution to the community Collaboration - The Grandview District project has the opportunity i to be influenced by many stakeholders but also by a team of experts and the market r Experience -The opportunity to share our diverse experience and create a truly unique project solution that is a regional model of excellence fil Reynolds OPUS FRAUENSHUH T11E OPU%CROUP Cm"R,,MA.( .* p e s i g n why our team Your Partner / w91N�,r� ow e \ • r�'�oaYOP.r�'��9 • ,peg Grandview Phase I Redevelopment Interview for Development Partner reCO B K v G R O U P FRANA companies Project Team • Intimate Team with Breadth of Experience • 20 Years Working Together • Proven Track Record of Similar Successful, Re- Developments • Residents of Edina • Prior Experience in Edina grecodevelopment Arnie Gregory Principal BKVe ngrineeringe G R O U P urban design Grandview Project Team Development g reco 77 0 Design Construction B KV G R O U P ANA. general FitA NA , A contractor Mike Krych, AIA Gretchen Camp,AlA NCARB, LEED Brady Halverson, ASIA RLA Mike Benedict Bob Mariotti, Jr. Design Partner AP Urban Designer PesidenL & Ovmer Constructcn Project Manager Partner. Entitlement Brent Rogers Jack Boa 1 AIA, NCARB V¢e President of Development Partner Grandview Project Team Development g reco 77 0 Design Construction B KV G R O U P ANA. general FitA NA , A contractor Mike Krych, AIA Gretchen Camp,AlA NCARB, LEED Brady Halverson, ASIA RLA Mike Benedict Bob Mariotti, Jr. Design Partner AP Urban Designer PesidenL & Ovmer Constructcn Project Manager Partner. Entitlement Project Experience G -, EHUUSE ".. ,� • arket Rate outing - oti 'Ike COPHM � �P artet Ram Ho a. � �y <�; 0 NORTH LOOP HERITAGE LANDING • 2.5 Acre Development • $32 Million • 229 Market Rate Rental Housing Units • 100 stalls of public parking RIVER STATION CONDOMINIUMS • 7.5 Acre Development • $175,000 /Unit • 360 Units of For -Sale Housing ELSEWAREHOUSE • Adaptive Reuse of a 3- and 6 -story Warehouse Building • 116 Market Rate Rental Housing Units • 127 Enclosed Parking Stalls • 230,000 sf of Total Building Area • c • THE COPHAM • Adaptive Reuse of a 7 -story Warehouse Building `. 000 P� • 120 Market Rate Rental Housing Units • 162,000 sf of Total Building Area tlr i Project Experience .Y tN o,. P P 2F _ ` s C- d—roum: 7 H C STAVE NE & UNIVERSITY • Multiple Phase Development • 3 City Blocks • 30 Apartments • 48 Townhomes • 107 Condominiums e 12 Brownstones • 14,000 sf Retail • 30,000 sf Office Space AWARDS: • City Business, the Best in Real Estate Project Experience �. ; �u y FLUX Apartn 6 Mld-O W GREENWAY E RiE7S'S'PFd,, ! ".e PMFS M .1 rr" a L L�. 1. �_.. ... __... .... _..__. 0 D • D 0 m UPTOWN /LYN -LAKE REDEVELOPMENT BLUE • 393,000 sf Multifamily Development • 242 Units Market Rate Housing • Uptown's First LEED Certified Market Rate Apartments LIME • 251,000 sf Multifamily, Mixed -Use Development • 171 Units Market Rate Housing • 242 Stall Underground Parking Ramp • Restaurant and Retail on Ground Level • FLUX • 290,000 sf Multi- family Development • 216 Units Market Rate Housing • 243 Underground Parking Stalls • Public promenade along the Midtown Greenway • • • • - :2if�sa. y:. • LAKE STREET • 3 y s M .1 rr" a L L�. 1. �_.. ... __... .... _..__. 0 D • D 0 m UPTOWN /LYN -LAKE REDEVELOPMENT BLUE • 393,000 sf Multifamily Development • 242 Units Market Rate Housing • Uptown's First LEED Certified Market Rate Apartments LIME • 251,000 sf Multifamily, Mixed -Use Development • 171 Units Market Rate Housing • 242 Stall Underground Parking Ramp • Restaurant and Retail on Ground Level • FLUX • 290,000 sf Multi- family Development • 216 Units Market Rate Housing • 243 Underground Parking Stalls • Public promenade along the Midtown Greenway Financing • Extensive experience with both public and private lenders and institutional investors • Successfully financed over $180 million in development projects since 2008, which contain over 100,000 sf of urban, mixed -use space Blue $50 Million 2008 Flux $40 Million 2012 ElseWarehouse $30 Million 2013 The Copham $25 Million 2012 Lime $35 Million 2014 Schedule / Process Community Engagement Key aspects to our neighbort ood outreach include: • Organizing the process to promote neighborhood review and input • Promote the city and Grandview District's "vision" within the context of the community • Creative presentation tools in models, renderings, and animations • Leadership in resolving neighborhood issues for the entitlement Planned Unit Development Process Key factors include: • Comprehensive urban planning for mixed use, retail, work place, service and housing • Diverse rental housing with affordable, market rate and senior housing • Transit - oriented service integration for auto, bus and rail • Community public space and commons for community identity and gathering Master Plan Options Feasibility & Financing • Master Plan and Public & private funding and Design concepts support, as needed evaluated Design Process • Site studies developed • Workshop sessions • Design concepts • Collaboration Environmental Investigation • Environmental review and site assessment • Maintain environmental sensitivity • Communication of impacts .e d� Project Construction - Phase I • Assess constructability • Coordination with the City and agencies • Consideration of the entire building's lifecycle • Onsite execution and oversight � ,• - r � Site Context V cd b�0 C .� IN is 4 AllwiIIII& (D (A (D as O WON -sw On "M 48, �!Is 1 1' 4 AllwiIIII& (D (A (D as Your Partner - Greco Development • Experts at Re- Creating Neighborhoods • Collaborative Process Brings YourVision to Reality • Research and Development of the Most Creative & Relevant Ideas • Intimate Team Size Provides a Personal Level of Service • Proven Track Record for Financial and Community Success & Sustainability • Members of the Edina Community, Committed to Implementing the Full Vision of the GrandView Master Plan • !a P T . Lj J • s ■ � � w r r - ' • � 0 a r, fib T ii O Q tJ .a � � ^trnrax.nz�O � J x. j r0 e t I Project Experience t P - .� IT- dl 1 • � ff.. s y' J s � t �,j ,, ' } . \p- •imcc , Apartmenti � �' � .� °nom: _'?�i•- ►,�,z�1ii!?'Y�'�`.� aF ` i . ` � F 7 SILVER LAKE ROAD & 37TH AVE NE • 321,000 sf Retail & Office Space • 261 Units General & Senior Housing 407 Units Condominium Housing in 3 phases • 32 units Side- by- SideTownhomes AWARDS: • MSP Business journal Best in Real Estate 2004, Mixed -Use Development • National Association of Industrial and Office Parks (NAIOP) Award of Excellence 2005, Mixed -Use BKV Project Experience 4p; W, rTw • a ` v '141 o� O a OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD • 2 Phase Redevelopment of Former City Hall Site • 22 Townhomes, 60 Condos in each • 4 -Story, 93 -Unit Senior Housing with 39 Assisted Living Units, 14 State -of -the -Art Memory Care Units, 40 Independent Living Units Project Experience EAST LAKE STREET ' ` \ sa ��•R _ �.. „1 Ar 4 Ili pr \ \ \ r-- IT, , I ; i %'t • . • I -•:' $' 4� Mrket Rate \ \ Market Ratei tr i a .... .... z \ \ a • z Rasing \ \ �. a i � • • nuo:,l.:td,: —� • •Green Roof •• \\ \ \ e I lacing .. - a ,sI STREET \ \ STATION • c5�b • � � � •� � tee!", .3. a� Able. 2o" - C1E-MII_I MMIe-1 • 450 -550 Units Multifamily Housing — Market Rate, Affordable, and Senior Housing • 6.5 Acres • 100,000 sf Office, 10,000 sf Retail • Midtown Farmers Market • Public Transit Plaza @� it �� �•a 'Z. t ■utuua OM This page intentionally left blank. C7 40 I is R twit, IL Wow PARTNERING TO CREATE THE VISION-, 490� 4 GRANDVIEW DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT fo fT v A low, 100 A la 40 September 2, 2014 9,14 KRAUS - ANDERSON® PAW,,REALTY COMPANY Kraus-Anderson Team Members with authentic tradition of creating vibrant, sustainable communities Mike Korsh, CPM David Graham, FAIA, LEED AP Kraus - Anderson Real Estate ESG Architects 20 years of diversified real estate Leader in the use of urban planning principles to management experience design urban redevelopment master plans that reinvigorate the urban realm Douglas Jandro Art Bartels, AIA, LEED AP Kraus - Anderson Construction Company ESG Architects 30 years of experience in development, Project Manager /Facilitator from Master financing, strategic analysis and critical Planning through Construction Implementation leadership teaming with local government ",' for complex redevelopments Bob Cunningham Dennis Sutliff, AIA, ULI Melrose Company ESG Architects Leader in creating vibrant, pedestrian- oriented , - Urban Planner, Designer of award - winning P I I communities such as Excelsior & Grand Mixed -Use Communities creating sustainable environments for live, work, & play Team members have a legacy of working in Edina on innovative master plans: Edinborough & Centennial Lakes Par "ering to create the vision Nr`' Philosophy 9&. Your partner is Kraus - Anderson Develop -to -Own /Long -term Hold Vi Public Private Partnerships T Legacy in the Community Long - Standing Business Relationships Ability to Own, Develop, Construct KA Communicates Partnering to create the vision %,rA -- One Southdale Pla e , 'S ! York w_n office Building'""_ odds . t ledical Super Target" Galleria Stores 1q L' ftf OPGabberts�� 4 Long -term commitment `4Centennial Laki *Shopping Cent, :. s-..__ L-enzenni Ater'- IL ai Iq u 33 VC Par } -ering to create the vision e wEim MWIMMIdaulli Centennial Lakes Edina, MN Community/ Recreation Center Event Venue Activates Public Realm Partnero,,g to create the vision VA, Par- °ering to create the vision We Know Mixed Use Excelsior &Grand Setting the Standard Process /Community Engagement Public /Private Balance Mixed — Use /TOD, Guiding Principles "Lessons Learned" East Ridge Performance Auditorium, Woodbury, MN Forestview Performance Auditorium, Brainerd, MN Partnering to create the vision We Know Community Spaces U.S. Land Port of Entry Plaza, Warroad, MN Augsburg College Kennedy Center, Minneapolis, MN Coloplast Headquarters Plaza, Minneapolis, MN Fountains at Hosanna Plaza, Lakeville, MN Midtown YWCA, Minneapolis, MN win X3 ■e NJ"M 9 8 I - 1 +r - ■w ■� ` iii•. _ � f � , ,4W r Para--ering to create the vision Grandview District ter: INTERCEPT VEHICLES AT PARKING RESOIaRCES � - 'i C ENHANCE CONNECTIVITY AND PERMEABILITY INTEGRATE W/ EXISTING FABRIC BIKEWAY/ PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO LARGER AREA I �J CONNECT TO OPEN SPACES The Spark FORM EDGES AND STREETS W/ EXISTING NEIGHBORS DEFINE PUBLIC REALM FROM PHASE ONE ANTICIPATE FUTURE PHASE CONNECTIONS TRANSIT CENTER AND sERVICE VEHICLES Partnering to create the vision' MIP -BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO WEST G� �OOo Par ; "ering to create the vision �6 v ENTIRE SITE STORMWATER I MANAGEMENT Reality Near Term CREATE ACTIVE STREET FRONT AT PHASE I PERIMETER CENTRAL COMMUNITY1 CIVIC RL11WING PERIMETER RESIDENTIAL W/ 2 -STORY STREET FRONTAGES/ STEPS 3 -6 STORY 6 -8 STORY RESIDENTIAL W/ ACTIVE STREET LEVEL VISIBILITY AND PERMEARILITY FROM MAJOR STREETS S lawo Partnering to create the vision Realit Mid Term KING DECK FOR IDENTIAL aSE RESIDENTIAL =R Reality Long Term PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION OVER HIOPWAY 100 FUTURE RESIDENTIAL MIXED -USE PEVELOPMENT i i "STREETSCAPE" /,CD IMPROVEMENTS AT OERRY'S ANP PARKING moPI�IcATlorvs � ; "COMPLETE STREETS" STREETSCAPE/ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Par* -ering to create the vision M Our Process 2014 2015 2016 2017 S 101 N 1131 J I F IMIAIMI J I J JAI S 101 NJ D I Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Process A Alternative E Evaluation) D Design & On Site Construction (16 -18 Months) Completion Refinement D Development S Selection A Approvals Commitment Philosophy Strength Your Partner, for the Future ... to complete your vision Par`nering to create the vision R m 11 Partnering to create the vision Questions &Answers The Spark Alternative "A" Partnering to create the vision W. The Spark Alternative "B" Pari--ering to create the vision W. rt j�j n r) Partnering to create the vision C� Reality —Mid Term A Mau • �i /t ; ;6-1 m Alternative "B" 141 N 11 Par ; -ering to create the vision 0— � -� Reality —Mid Term fin/ IN Alternative "C" _ek- 4 FG t7A ��a_ &M Ow- re 4 R Pri nci pl el. Rel ated to the Concept Di ag ram Partnering to create ine vision &A GraDhic 1 Lin a jI MEW _ek- 4 FG t7A ��a_ &M Ow- re 4 R Pri nci pl el. Rel ated to the Concept Di ag ram Partnering to create ine vision &A GraDhic 1 Lin a Concept Diagrams &A Graahic 2 Create "go to" and "stay at" uses Connect throughout Easy to get to; easy to get around ParO —ering to create the vision I R "A Q &A Graphic 3 ■ i �3ilti�111 �-- . y j I W. f VW 1 r%mrqmwrmw�w ■ dGreer)$' 0' a C ` Wanner /OLG Pro perty Par*-,ering to create the vision &A Graahic 4 MWA 0. Public Realm 51 st St y f� 5? rpd St ti r 'fit r �!sil.. • e i r • ' m s � * S +� r. �* c L ALAL UP �t rl f &A Graahic 5 Or- Or reM:r_s r r i, . R f .✓ � . Partnering to create the vision Pub Iir RFs ,jlm / /pen Space Dbgram .A.GrandViEw Gornn-ons R.GrandView Steps C .Ki ra nd'dew C ros si ng D.Arcadia Streetxape E.Gus'Young Streetscap=_ F. Arcade Co nnection G. Aarnon Streetxape H. _den Streetxa pe m Land Use ■ LF Ink ■ P41 - ! r i 1 awl a - .4 r--- lot 0 kkkk 1 ■ ?''� ! Par + -,ering to create the vision O � S 1 !.� &A Graphic 6 L-,istirig Duiidirigs P3temia Devebprnent PooposedCivK Corn munity Buildings 0 iA Implementation 0 b � ❑ U 4 a 7 2, ii n ri ii ♦ v 'I q I r Partnering to create the vision i &A Graahic 7 L�1 r 0 7 6101! 1 1 1 &A Graphic 9 Partnering to create the vision � This page intentionally left blank. Bi.11- I want to thank you for the opportunity for Doran Companies to interview for the Grandview Redevelopment. We are excited about the opportunity and would love to collaborate on the possibilities with you. Thank you for considering Doran Companies. FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group September 3, 2014 Delivered via electronic mail Mayor Hovland and City Council Members 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Thank you again for the opportunity to introduce our team for the role as the City's development partner for the Grandview Phase 1 Redevelopment Project. We are committed to working with the City of Edina to create a development plan that embraces the GrandView District Development Framework and will be a catalyst for long term private and public investment in the Grandview District. As mentioned during our interview, we have completed projects incorporating private- public use elements in a variety of ways. We use our internal sources to finance our projects, and offer extensive financial depth and the capacity to complete this project. Where creative financing of .public elements and amenities are needed, we've used private financing and when appropriate, a combination of public tools such as tax increment financing and/or philanthropic sources to achieve desired project outcomes. In our experience, this has been a proven strategy to achieve alignment and the best outcomes for all interested parties. The GrandView Phase 1 project should reflect the values of our Edina community and be the beginning of the new centerpiece district for the Twin Cities region. We, are excited to get started with the City of Edina, its staff and community stakeholders to begin this exciting project. Sincerely, David R. Frauenshuh CEO and Founder 7101 West 7P Street, Suite 100 ® Minneapolis, Ivimnesota 55439 13 Tel: 952.829.3480 1€1 .' FrauenshuhCommeroal.com g recc BUILDING FORWARD 607 WASHINGTON AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 September 4, 2014 (612)630.2450 (612)630.2453 FAX Mayor James Hovland WWW.GR.ECOLLC.COM Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: GrandView Redevelopment - Public Realm Discussion Honorable Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members: We appreciate the time we were given to present our qualifications for the GrandView Redevelopment and the interactive dialogue and questions. Our presentation was primarily focused on the Phase One project area for a residential development as defined in the overall plan. From the comments we heard it appeared that we adequately covered our qualifications in housing development but more detail would have been appreciated for the broader master plan and our ideas for the "public realm." Prior to the interview we had discussed the current plan and a number of ideas for the public areas that could support the development. To address the questions presented to us at the interview we prepared the attached site plan and narrative to share in more detail our thoughts for addressing the "public realm" in the overall development plan. Hopefully the City will accept this submittal as an elaboration of our ideas for the overall project potential as your partner in the development. As the center of Edina, the development can be recognized as a unique and symbolic destination for the community. In the master plan for the town center there needs to be a strong public focus that energizes the overall plan. For it to be a thriving center it needs to include a broad range of uses and be a center for people to live, work, socialize and play. From our experiences and travels, "place making" for a community takes many interconnected elements to be achieved. These are some of our ideas for elements that can be studied to achieve this for Edina. It begins with a vision........ A Town Square artfully connected to The Cultural Center 1. Town Square — A central Edina Town Square can be developed as a whole block centered on the main pedestrian boulevard to the City Hall. This generates a grand outdoor classic City Square and Park framed by midrise (6 -story) residential structures with cafes, outdoor dining and boutique shops. As one of the highest points in the overall downtown area, the Town Square will create a presence for the "center of Edina ". 2. Arts Bridge and Pedestrian Boulevard — To the east is the pedestrian boulevard across Highway 100 to the City Hall. This can be a 30 foot wide pedestrian promenade designed as an "Art Bridge" with sculptural elements connecting the Cultural /Civic Center with the Town Square. As viewed from Highway 100, the proposed "Arts Bridge" is an urban night and day marker for the Edina town center - an active link between the Town Square, City Hall and a new Cultural Center that brings together the downtown location. As the boulevard extends west to the rail line it both bridges the line and allows a vertical connection down to a streetcar line and/or bikeway to the north and south areas of the city. 3. Cultural Center — This key component can express the cultural life, history and arts in the City's downtown plan. A location at the City Hall together with an Amphitheater area for music creates a major civic anchor on the east side of downtown. The major activities on the east side expands the public realm and enhancing the scale of the downtown with civic anchors on the east and west sides. The Arts Bridge over Highway 100 may be a formidable task but achievable when it connects such major civic elements. 4. Residential with Mixed -Use — The populating of the downtown area through mid -rise density residential housing is critical to create a 2417 living downtown neighborhood center. The residential density in apartments, condos and townhouses needs to be adjacent to open public space, retail and amenity /cultural areas that support the social community. The residents want a sense of place for where they live. The public realm for the streets and entry courtyards needs to provide aesthetic views both near and far. The residential use is the engine to create a viable and vibrant community that defines the heart of a classical town center. 5. Pedestrian Street Scape Boulevards - The north /south streets connecting to the Town Square can be tree -lined with terraced housing entries to the sidewalk, landscaped boulevard and parallel parking. The apartments can have terraced, stepped back top floors to add light to the street scape. Between the blocks of housing there can be public courtyards or "woonerfs" aligned perpendicular to the boulevards as public court yards and parking. These provide aesthetic views and an amenity for residents. 6. Neighborhood Retail — On the first floor of buildings surrounding the Town Square, there will be additional retail to service the greater City and the new residential neighborhood. Currently there is quality destination retail in the area that will continue to bring people to the area. The new retail, restaurants and commercial will need to relate strongly to the residents' lifestyle, and thus will need outdoor gathering and dining areas. 7. Transit Connectors — The bus, auto and future rail transit should be integrated and accessible yet not impact the pedestrian focus of the downtown. The lower level location of the greenway rail line/bikeway allows a through -town movement for future transit. A vertical connection and bridge can be provided to the main east/west boulevard, connecting to the Town Square. Like our Uptown Greenway projects, the Grand View Greenway could be lined with three- to five -story residential buildings, have a pedestrian way on both sides and incorporate ramp connections to the rail level. It could be a visually - enhanced open view corridor for housing while screening the back of the existing retail buildings. The attached rendered plan illustrates the ideas stated above. What we have suggested reflects our individual thoughts and are submitted with that limitation. This illustrates a wide range of "public realm" ideas that are all classical principals for the development of great communities. As we presented on Tuesday, we have applied many of these principals within our projects as part of our community - building efforts. Nothing presented is beyond what can be attained with the joint efforts of us all. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to discuss your vision for the Grandview area of Edina. We look forward to partnering on this journey to create an inspiring downtown center of Edina. Best Regards, Arnie Gregory V Jack Boarman Greco Development BKV Group ,� \� l � y �t{.. _ <� l' } _. �.• `'''may �.�. i' ' '`� L `� r`��'��. � ' - 1 r 'S`, i�;eti ;�s41. ".�t.'•U" ` �t er 1 �`,i �n �tt'y�1i JJ� (g�.ti��iq, .` Z �� I�1s � ; :.... r 1 �c��'1 i �'t�•'�. ��'�T,.`: Fy;t��t +rtk'� . ( "' y.' 11 i .• 9 ;'''t• ti _'1 � � l�G suA .; 1 �''�1� ��` fi .'t;a� ��'t e 4t 1� �% ti7 - 7 � � �. '� •S� �, I � �� -Ct� " k 't�aULT�U _ ,C NCR§ )� ,, �I �6 r�St • `!1 1 Z D fl "� I( -tY �� -v t � �,. `.ii tit. T y `�% 'S " 1 S' � v I • 't `L.. t . -�.fJ .1 � / R.�>4 _ t•L�,e, ,� c" `� _ - t, T RI` GEE$TRI N ULE _ D • 4 •`'-�. ct ` � { � I :c ,T, 1 _ : � �� t.� �� �cid�,'�''�,. I5T0 � ;;�, �' ,� y 1 r' cfn . � ` � � � 7h� � � ���sy, ti� - F- • .6 6 ` 1 ti � � ,,gay � ". - i:2t }�' ` OURTYARD URTYARD f ,:� iKi3y o t t� RAIL � i � � • n •r. "v .r � .. 1 Y 1 1 a ' , v � � VIEW, MASTER PLAN l3 f a 5 09/05/14 4�TL -� greCO 8 Kv F RAN�A Resident Comments received by BN Sept 4 -11th, 2014. re: Development Partner Interviews From: Joel Stegner [ mailto :joel.r.stegner @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:13 PM To: Bill Neuendorf Subject: Grandview project comment Hi Bill, I have some comments to share regarding the Grandview. Although I serve on the Community Health Commission, I am speaking as an individual and not for them. CHC does believe that Health in All Policies should be considered with Grandview as with any other city project, but that is not the point of my communication. As I have served the research lead for major corporationsand done these kinds of evaluations myself, I understand how difficult a job screening potential developers can be and am just attempting to encourage the City leaders to do more to connect this project to overall city priorities and the changing needs of people who live here. Thanks, Joel My comments: I have been tracking the Grandview process closely since it was developed, along with other major development projects now happening in Edina —the Southdale build -up, the Braemar sports . complex, and the Fred Richards- Pentagon Park redevelopment. The City seems to do these one -off projects, not considering how they relate to each other or the city's overall long -term priorities. Let me illustrate. The City of Edina operates a Community Center in a shared space with Edina Public Schools. Despite some changes, it looks like the same old building as when I moved into Edina in 1985. There isn't the big community center sign that I see in other communities, perhaps because the City doesn't own the building. it doesn't contain all of Edina's community services (those found at Edina Art and Senior Center Centers) or match the services provided by Edina's neighboring communities. Should the schools need the space in the near future (which I think to be likely), the community center functions of the building would,be displaced. The lack of a modern community center puts Edina behind its neighbors. Within 5 -10 years, Edina will need a new community center. Where would it go? Having one located across the highway from City Hall would essentially establish a public corridor with great visibility and access. When the public talks about wanting the project to have a heavy public purpose (just not another high end residential, office and retail complex), the services they mention fit into a community center. I don't know if the size of the place is..large enough - the architects should talk about that — but if Edina needs a community center, where better to put it? It could put it down in the Fred Richard, Pentagon Park complex — but access wouldn't be good, unless it was accessible close to at Highway 100 and 77th. Unless Southdale Shopping Center were to close and the whole area be redeveloped, there really isn't space there fora community center. All the land at Braemar is spoken for. There aren't obvious alternative locations with 0 good access and visibility. Edina's public facilities (other than City Hall) are not both highly visible and accessible. When doing future public spaces, this problem needs to be addressed. Our council and boards as well as those who attend public hearings tend to be age 40 and over. However, when we plan future facilities, we are building them for those who are choosing where to live as adults — young singles, couples and families —those people who were born after 1980 — the millennial generation, often the age of our children and grandchildren. They have very. different values, interests and tastes than earlier generations. They are more cooperative than competitive, more interested in practical lifestyles than the acquisition of stuff and face the daunting task of paying off student loans, developing careers, raising families and preparing for retirement when growth in pay levels is static and movement up the corporate ladder is slowing down. Both parents will be working, so they will need cost and time efficient solutions. The prestige that Edina had for earlier generations may or may not carry over to them. We need to work with a developer who is making a genuine attempt to understand what this group" is looking for. When the City narrowed the choices to four proposals, it managed to exclude two developers that brought different experiences to the table than the four that were selected — one that actually designed a revitalization project with a well functioning community center, the other the only group primarily made up of a team under the age of 40, With the non -profit developer that fits the generation mind -set. First, one of the proponents has done the redevelopment of Hopkins, including the successful Hopkins Center for the Arts: Perhaps Hopkins is not seen as a peer community by Edina community'leaders, but Hopkins has a lot to offer to the younger, more value oriented person. That development has really worked and as a result, they have been used for other Hopkins redevelopment projects (there are a few going there as well). This project seems to be more of a public - private partnership than anything the four selected developers are done. The other rather drastic alternative was the non - profit developer — Place. Other than being non- profit, there were other two ways they were clearly distinct: Their mostly under age 40 project team wasn't just another group of virtually all white males well over the age of 40. Might their team have 'a more natural understanding of what the Millennials are looking for in terms of a community? And this difference shows up in how they did their projects — with lots of grass roots involvement and really focused on public purposes. Because they are non - profit (like Beacon), they don't come in with solid financing for projects, but develop it from different sources — including but not limited to government. It was very disappointing to me that neither was included, because their inclusion would stretch the more traditional developers to do something other than a cookie -cutter public private project that it 90% office- retail -high end residential (and of course, no affordable housing — cannot afford it — cuts too much into the profitability for the developer). Throwing in a small, invisible public building, a small park and maybe another sculpture garden, which seems to be the mindset of the traditional developers, simply doesn't respond enough to the already expressed public interest in major public purposes. I wonder if they even bother to read what residents said they wanted from the project in the recent city survey. Instead, the city went with four developers who have:already worked with the City (let's call them the, "good old boys club" as there are existing relationships). It may in fact be that the city always intended to work with someone it has already used and opened it up to abroad group without the intention of considering unfamiliar applicants. I'm not saying I believe that —but I'd suggest that it has that appearance. However, if7the City is not willing to interview a couple other Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to 9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner interviews Page 2 proponents with greater real world experience with a project with a major public component, then the question should be how effective have the previous projects they have done have been. If they didn't do such a great job, or one did a outstanding job, this should be considered. Let me talk about Centennial Lakes and the Promenade. This site was developed primarily to service commercial interests with some nice amenities included including a public building, the pond, walking path, lawn games and band shell, and sculpture garden. I have had the opportunity to perform a couple times at the band shell — a good performance space — but the site — more challenging. First, it is very close to a street, so there is constant traffic noise. Second, while there is some parking on the street, there isn't much and one has a significant walk to get there — if one even knows where it is, because it is pretty invisible without much signage. The available seating is not adequate for the number of people who want to;,' attend, which often means people have to get there very early —which is challenging, because the seating area is unshaded and gets very hot in the summer. Iimas clearly built to fit a left -over space that really wasn't quite big enough and right for its public purpose. Then there is the Promenade. It is largely invisible unless one sees it while winding through the traffic circles on 70th (best to watch to road, or get hit, because people don't have the knack quite yet). There is really no public parking, so one has to find a parking space in a busy commercial area and make the trek to get there. As I drive 70`h and look down the Promenade, I seldom see anyone using the path. If one goes to the Park and Red activity guide, the map page doesn't really highlight where it is. So while the Promenade is a nice idea, how many people are actually aware of it and using it? Another project is the Senior Center, sharing a building with the Hennepin County Library. It is buried in a residential neighborhood, in the middle of a residential development. Unless someone happened to be driving to the library, one would never know that it exists. For a Senior Center, the whole issue, is use. What percentage of Edina seniors are members and how often do they use it? Are the programs self- sustaining, or do they involve a major subsidy? I don't have the numbers, but I believe that Senior Centers in other communities that are more visible and accessible have much heavier use. The developer of that project didn't appear to maximize the program benefits of such a program. I'd suggest that if you want to just work with people you have worked with before, you should be thinking about whether they did their best work. You can consider that question by simply auditing how well those sites are working and/or by asking the developer some simple questions like — what do you think is working best and what is most problematic about the projects you have designed for Edina? If they are unable to answer, they are simply in the mode of designing projects that may or may not work, and not using their design successes and failures to guide their future work. I have also heard that the City wants to have the developer lay out a public process for input, but only after one is selected. That shows a leap of faith, which might not be justified. I'd point out that the City has already gained considerable input, including a survey that said that a major component of the project should be public. I hope that previous public input isn't forgotten when the developer gets going - no need to pay to redo things. If you want a- company that actually uses public input, wouldn't it make sense to have them describe exactly how they would propose to do that before you award the contract, and in fact asks them to provide details on actual public processes (and their impact) on other projects Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to`9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner,interviews Page 3 they have done? It is nice if they lay out a process, but if they have no experience with getting public input or ended up ignoring everything that was suggested, instead simply doing the plan they thought best in the first place, it becomes one large game of charades. That gets to a bigger issue, as illustrated by the Beacon process. How does the City want to build public input into all of its major decisions? One used to have to come to the meeting to have one's say (assuming one knew something was on,the agenda), but now one can get notice and respond to.these. things in writing — „a big`improverdent., However, at what point does the city actually rely on opinion research — a random sample of'the population —rather than just listening to the loudest voices or best organized group? Outsourcing public input to a developer that really isn't accountable to people who live here without heavy direction in terms of what works tome just doesn't make a lot of sense, particularly if you actually engage the company first and�then hope for the best. I would hope that you would ask all of the potential developers a few more questions before you select one and don't essentially give them free rein on how to approach this project. If this is, what happens and you have a cookie -cutter office /retail/high end residential project with no affordable housing and a public component that is very lightly used, that is not going to attract the new residents who will make Edina a vibrant, in -demand community in the future. ################################## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## From: Ted Davis [mailto:tedhdavis @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:30 AM To: Bill Neuendorf Subject: Grandview Dear Members of the City Council and Mr. Neuendorf, The four teams presented very different approaches and personalities. They are all proven professionals that have the capacity of building the Grandview development. Which will provide the best solution for Edina and the Grandview development? Please accept my observations of each team below. Doran Companies/ ESG This team was the most successful in showing possibilities and creating a sense of `what can be'. They took a chance in showing ideas and I think it was 'well done. ESG has an excellent record of designing innovative projects. They are the best design firm of the proposed teams. One concern I had was this teams focus on housing and saying it won't be retail or medical office. If the housing market crashes, which it will eventually do, having an open mind to the possibilities will be crucial to the City. Despite this, the Doran team was impressive in their approach and design sensitivity. Frauendhuh / Opus Having worked with David Frauenshuh on the LaSalle Plaza project, and knowing his history, I believe he does indeed bring proven capabilities to the City. Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to 9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner interviews Page 4 Convergence made a convincing presentation for providing a positive process for engaging the public. Terry Minarek is new to the company, as is the company to the Cities. Will others from Convergence come to town to help lead the effort? I was impressed with Dennis Reynolds and his thoughts on what the project could become. This is a formidable team, except for the lack of a top design firm. Greco / BKV As they noted, they are an experienced team together, which can be a positive. They presented a very residential focus — again, what happens if the residential bubble bursts? A successful development and city has multiple uses and amenities. I don't think this team showed the vision on the urban or neighborhood scale. This is more than just developing and building singular residential units. Overall, this team was the least successful in presenting a vision for the project. Though they have done some successful buildings, the Grandview project is more than a building. It is about a new neighborhood that should energize this part of our City and become a stellar example of new development. This team didn't bring the vision. Kraus Anderson / ESG Sometimes one shouldn't focus on the presentation, but the track record of the team. After all, the presentation is only a short time, and in this case, a very short time due to the time deadline of the meeting. Both KA and ESG have excellent records of doing quality work. In addition, Bob Cunningham spoke eloquently about the teams vision for the project. Together, this should be a formidable development and design team. I wish the teams had dared to dream more, to think outside their comfort zones, to think more about what could make a truly remarkable addition to Edina. A site with substantial topography, how might one make this.accessible to elderly, as well as young. How could a park link this site, as well with other parts- of the area? How can that park be more than leftover space and be a special place for all citizens to come to? How can new retail integrate with the housing, to make this a living environment that is unique to Edina? Hopefully, this will develop during the process for whatever team is selected. To meet this challenge, the chosen team will need to bring not only experience, but creativity. Thank you for considering my comments. Sincerely, Ted Davis, FAIA, I DA, LEED AP (Design Principal, RSP Architects) 4600 Concord Terrace, Edina ######################################### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to 9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner interviews Page 5 From: dornblaser [mailto:dornb001 @umn.eduj Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:44 AM To: Bill Neuendorf Subject: Grandview Options Bill - Doran should be rejected as basically housing development, Greco for less competence than others. Council member comments and questions re- importance of "public realm as catalyst /focal point for development provide fundamental criteria. Dorn ########################################### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## From: Eugene Persha [mailto:eoersha @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview's Developers' Initial Proposals To: Members of City Council, City Manager, Planning Dept., and Economic Development Dept. From: Gene Persha Date: September 10, 2014 Topic: Grandview Development After watching, participating in the Grandview I Community Advisory Team, and looking at many depictions and ideas for redeveloping the Grandview site for over five years, I have some observations and recommendations. 1) The "Final Four" developers, it seemed to me, did not read either Grandview I's report closely, or did not have any idea ofwhat the "desired end result" was to be, or just not really cognizant of the difficulties for development as delineated by the Grandview II team. 2) Very little reference, specific reference, was made to the work of Grandview I and II. 3) If one looks at all four presentations by the "Final Four ", it is apparent the civic, the public purpose of this site, has been lost. 4) To me, there was a total lack of creativity for developing this site. Nothing stood out. 5) The central focus, as presented by the "Final Four ", was highrise apartment buildings towering over everything else, even the postage stamp size green space /public plaza. 6) The terrain of the land was really not taken into account or used in an effective way, especially at the bottom of the hill on Eden Avenue.Perhaps, this area could have a higher structure because of the topography. I do not think anyone in our Grandview I Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to 9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner interviews Page 6 group envisaged the largeness of possible apartment buildings as this, and even in the location depicted. 7) Once again, clear sight lines, blockages of light, shadowing, over densifying a small area, just overwhelms this small space. 8) Not one developer, gave a large chunk of land to either a public building, public square, or even a park and ride facility which was never really depicted in any form. 9) The emphasis by every developer was to squeeze as much revenue out of the Grandview site on their unwarranted assumption of their total ownership and control. The proposals were none other than proposals to make money, and not a plan °to fit the. city's needs, yet alone expectations for this land. 10) Note: the Community /Public Building appears as an "add on" really with no connection by shape and form to the proposed apartment buildings, the chief structures'- here. 11) Where are the amenities such as walk paths, a bicycle corridor, flower gardens, tree preserves,' and some break up of the concrete structural look? The visitors need and outdoor utilitarian use also. It is a city -wide use area! 12) The bus garage is alwaysT mentioned (that elusive future desirable), but there never is even a suggestion how to deal with it? I will give one: Use city money and financing, with TIF funds to help get the school district get a new facility in the limited areas it might go within the city. 13) Covering the railroad tracks or building over them just will not happen without a tremendous financial encumbrance. The railroads have pre- eminent rights historically as few private entities have today. A better suggestion would be to make a more functional bridge over the tracks by Davanni's and across from the Edina Liquor Store. Has any one of our developers asked the railroad to help partner a new crossing over the, tracks? J 14) Notice, there were no step downs or step ups in the building heights. Maybe the contour of the land might lend itself to some of this type of design. 15) There was any over emphasis on apartment buildings at the expense of everything else. 16) There was no mention of trying to buy or partner with the owner of the "building on stilts" at the base of Eden Avenue. What would the owner get in return? Maybe some city help to make this a more comprehensive and wholistic designed area? 17) Did you notice that one of the developers proposed an outdoor swimming pool? Did this group even consider a possible joint use in a community center? Anyway, there is no green space given instead of the pool area. Everything is tailored to building tenants. 1.8) What about a reconfiguration of the roadways and access roads that are adjacent to Hyw. 100? According to Grandview I, that definitely had possibilities. Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to 9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner interviews Page 7 19) Can't we easily destroy an area with over density and building size and decreased livability and community use when we pack it all in Grandview? 20) Developers like to use the city's small projected green space here, or better yet, Our Lady of Grace's green space for their front yard, but they minimize their contribution to this, and-surely for the public realm. Their obligations and needs are met by others. 21),,1'think we need some competition for "best design" for this area rather.than turn this into one commercial venture where that is the visible emphasis. Every developer should submit(an actual sketch plan) in three contexts: A) bigger development -1/2 of the area for a building /s B) major public /community building C) one half green space area Which could even include a utilitarian green roof over a park and ride or parking ramp naturalized. 22) After three different plans with different emphases are submitted, they could be rated by,meeting the "desired future objectives.' If you have seen an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS), and I am not suggesting one, but they have alternatives with perceived attributes and deficiencies listed.' Out of this comes a "preferred alternative." I have always liked the format of this since things are spelled out. It also serves as a good comparison document. They can be scored, ranked, or rated for appropriateness for the area. 23) We need some innovative ventures put forward for Grandview. We have limits, but we do have some real possibilities for something different. How can we do something different because of the location? 24) We must never forget what I call "the carrying capacity" for this small parcel of land. There has to be a definable limit how much can be put into the Grandview site. 25) None of the developers talked about costs. Interesting! We need cost estimates for various components of things that could be put in at Grandview. We need to understand reality here, and see what is possible with the funds made available in a whole variety of ways. 26) We are not subsidizing a developer: we are subsidizing our city's interests. 27)Lastly, I suggest new guidelines modeled after the Grandview I design and the Grandview 11 "wants and objections ". This would be coupled with input from the Planning Commission, City Council, City Staff, and most importantly the general public. Lay out the best designs in the three categories, critique them, and then let anyone do their own sketch plan or modification of what they see keeping in mind the real financial constraints of what things cost. 28) We cannot throw this piece of property up for grabs so a developer first and foremost wants to make the maximum amount tailored toward their interests. The developer plans need to fit into prescribed guidelines in the fashion as I suggested. There always must be that "Visible Public Purpose." That should be Guideline #1! Resident Comments received by BN 9/4 to 9/11/2014 RE: Development Partner interviews Page.8 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL w9tN�',l� o e Agenda Item M VIII. D. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering' Action Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Development Contract with City Homes Development, LLC for the Acres DuBois Development Action Requested: Approve Development Contract with City Homes Development, LLC for the Acres DuBois Development Information / Background: On February 18, 2014, the City Council approved the Final Plat, Development Contract and Preservation Easement for the Acres DuBois Development with M -K Holdings. M -K Holdings has sold the development to City Homes Development, LLC (City Homes). This action will transfer the requirements of the development as detailed at the February 18 City Council meeting to City Homes. As an update, the Final Plat has been filed with Hennepin County, park dedication fees have been paid to the City and City Homes is currently finalizing construction plans to gather permits from the City, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and other regulatory agencies. All other requirements and /or submittals detailed in the final plat materials, development contract, preservation easement, or council meeting minutes will be met prior to construction. If all conditions are met, construction may begin this fall Staff recommends approval of the Development Contract with City Homes Development, LLC. Attachments: Development Contract City Council Minutes February 18, 2013 G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV% PROJECTS \CONTRACTSIPRIVATE\P2012 \P012.1 Aves DuboisUtem VIII. D. City Homes Development Cont actdooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ACRES DUBOIS ADDITION CONTRACT dated , 2014, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and CITY HOMES DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer'). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for the Acres DuBois Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "plat "). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it at the time of application for the initial grading permit, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within one (1) year after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, as evidenced by grading, utility or building permits or other written authorization to proceed, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City's Community Development Director has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For five (5) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, and not in conflict with any portion of the development already completed or under construction, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A — Final Plat Plan B — Acres DuBois Preliminary Plan Set Plan C — Final Construction Plans and Specifications 6. IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AND PAID FOR BY DEVELOPER. The Developer shall construct and pay 100% of the cost of the following improvements in accordance with the development plans: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Sewer System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter 2 G. Street Lights H. Underground Utilities I. Surveying and Staking J. Site Grading, Stormwater Treatment/Infiltration Basins, and Erosion Control K. Sidewalks L. Setting of Iron Monuments 7. DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENT. Improvements required by this Contract to be constructed'by the Developer shall be installed in accordance with plans approved by the City and in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, regulations and policies. .The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the.'City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field y. inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance, as stated in Section 9, Engineers Record Drawings. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City's inspectors and engineers. The D'eveloper's engineer shall provide for on -site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract . administration between. the Developer and .the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule pre- construction meetings; as necessary to coordinate the work and to allow the City to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in good and,, workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No material deviations.from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the City. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the. Contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any. materials not covered 3 _ a • by the plans and- :specifications and special conditions of this, Contract, . for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work-is .first ordered in writing by the City Engineer as - provided in the specifications. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes '505.02, the' final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners "must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the,City certifying that the monuments. have been installed following site grading, utility and street' construction. 8 CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION/ CONSTRUCTION COSTS. The Developer shall pay a fee for in -house engineering administration. City engineering administration`will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its 'engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection., and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. The Developer ' shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's in -house ,engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and street construction and will be.-.billed on hourly rates The Developer improvements cost breakdown is: o Street Construction $171,005 o Site Grading $162,000 o Storm Sewer $125,200 o Sanitary Sewer $ 81,225 o. Watermain 142,9_80 Estimated Construction Cost $582,510 Estimated City Engineering Fees (6 %) $34,951 Total Estimated Construction Cost 610 46 9. ENGINEERS RECORD DRAWINGS. The. Developer's engineer shall. prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record 4 ,. Drawing requirements, attached hereto as Exhibit 'A," showing those approved changes made during the construction process, based on the marked up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to the Developer's Engineer. The Record Drawings shall be submitted prior to the Developer receiving an occupancy permit for any building 10. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a twenty -five, percent (25 %) ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 6 above. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits or as needed, including but not limited to: A. Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains B. MPCA NPDES Permit for Construction Activity C. MPCA for Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal D. City of Edina for Building Permits E. MCES for Sanitary Sewer Connections F. Minnehaha Creek for Watershed Permit The City shall provide cooperative assistance in securing permits from other agencies. 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements and other work required by this Development Contract by October 31, 2016. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. R 14. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with `the 'approved grading drainage and erosion "control plan, . Plan B ". The plan shall conform to City's Design and Construction Manual. Within thirty (30) `days after: completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the" City with a "record" grading plan certified by a `registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "record plan shall contain site grades and field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds b) location and elevations along all swales, emergency overflows, wetlands, wetland mitigation "areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas /stockpiles; c) lot corner elevations and. house pads; d) top and bottom of retaining walls. 15. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. 16. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the public streets are, accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed.. In the event that any building or residential unit is occupied prior to completing streets; the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to insure that the streets are passable #o traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the plat clean of dirt and debris that may spill,, track, or wash onto the street from Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by :plowing snow from the streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for repairing the streets because of snow plowing operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. The Developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately: adjacent to the development. At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis: A copy of this contract shall be, approved by the City, t.: 6 before grading is started. The "contract shall provide that the City may direct the contractor to clean the streets and bill the Developer. 17. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: - Contractor's Certificate - Engineer's Certificate - Land Surveyor's Certificate - Developer's Certificate certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Contract. All necessary forms will be furnished by the City. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed public improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "record" plans, an electronic file of the "record" plans in accordance with the City's Design and Construction Manual. 18. PARK DEDICATION. The property within the Plat has already paid park dedication for 6 lots. The Developer shall make cash contribution of $10,000 to satisfy the City's park dedication requirements, calculated at the rate of $5,000.00 /unit x 2 units. Payment is due at the time prior to City execution of the final plat. 19. BUILDING PERMITS /CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties and the halting of all work in the plat. B. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be 7 issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a' bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City Engineer. F F 20. RESPONSIBILITY, FOR COSTS. A. Beginning after final approval has been granted by the City and except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City including but not1imited to legal, engineering and inspection expenses in connection with ' the ongoing development of the plat, the enforcement. of this Contract, review 'of construction plans and documents,° and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the plat. The City's costs and expenses must be agreed to in writing by the developer before the City starts any work. B. The Developer shall hold the City and-,its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The; Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages,,.-or expenses which the City may pay or incur in. consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, _including. reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. D. Each party shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the other for obligations incurred A under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within sixty (60) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per year. E. In addition to the charges referred to herein,; other charges and special assessments may be imposed such, as but not limited'to sewer availability charges ( "SAC') charges and building permit fees. REC fees will not be required due to the developer installing the watermain and sanitary sewer system. 21. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the comments in the March 22, 2013, (Revised 3 -27 -2013) memorandum from the Director of Engineering to the Community Development Director. 8 B. City of Edina Resolution 2013 -39 C. Developer must provide a tree and slope preservation easement to the City to preserve the steep slopes on the site and the 10 mature trees identified in the Preliminary Tree Preservation plan simultaneous with the recording of the final plat. D. Approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and compliance with the District's requirements. E. The Developer shall construct of a 4 or 5 foot wide sidewalk either within the right- of- way on the west side of the public street or such other location approved by the City Engineer. If the sidewalk is not constructed within the right -of- way the Developer shall, prior to construction of the sidewalk, convey to the City an easement over the area where the sidewalk is constructed. The easement must be in a form approved by the City Attorney. F. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan and is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. G. Developer shall provide a construction management plan to the City for the overall development of the site at the time of application for the initial grading permit and for each individual home construction prior to issuance of a building permit. H. Utility hook -ups are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer I. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road simultaneous with the recording of the final plat. J. Developer must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street within the Plat and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration is subject to approval of the City engineer. (Letter of Credit) K. Developer must install a stop sign on the new street within the Plat approaching Morningside Road at a location approved by the City Engineer. Clear site lines shall be maintained from the intersection. 1 9 L. Developer shall grade Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's .1 st Addition in accordance with the approved grading plan. • `Upon completion,of grading the Developer shall reestablish turf on.,the graded property in accordance 'with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction, 2014 edition. Turf shal,l.be warranted 'to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) monthsj after planting. Any replacement turf shall be warranted for twelve (12) months,.' from, the time of planting. " M. The new roadway within the Plat shall be built to City standards; which is 28 -ft back of curb to back of curb. N. Developer, must install signage stating "No Parking Fire Lane" along one side.of the "new'road within the Plat the entire length of the road; subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshall. O. Developer shall install fire hydrant(s) near, the end of the cul= de- sac'and possibly at the intersection of Morningside, subject to review and approval of the Fire.Marshall. P. Developer must remove the existing home on the south side of the property within the Plat and all accessory buildings located within the Plat. Q. Developer shall`maintain the storm water features located within the Platted area for a'period. of three years following final acceptance after construction. After the period of three years it will be the responsibility of the City for maintenance. 22. MISCELLANEOUS., A. The Developers obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells, assigns, transfers or conveys one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. The Developer shall notify the City when it sells, assigns, conveys or transfers any of its rights, title or interest in the site. B. In compliance with the Response Action Plan approved by the MPCA for the property, the developer shall remove and properly dispose of any environmental contamination within the plat. C. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and' specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical `engineer licensed by the State of 10 Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in this Contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. D. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage at the time of application for the initial grading permit. E. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. F. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with Lots 1 -7 of the plat and may be recorded against Lots 1- 7. In the event this Contract is recorded, the City, covenants to provide a recordable Certificate of Completion promptly upon the completion of the work required herein. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to Lots 1 -7 of the plat; that there are no 11 unrecorded interests in Lots 1 -7; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 23. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty -eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 24. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all public improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to Section 6 of this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either a warranty /maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvements, or a letter of credit for twenty -five percent (25 %) of the amount of the original cost of these improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains 'shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, retaining walls, materials and equipment shall be subject to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all 12 work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is two growing seasons following installation. 25. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract by the Developer, payment of the costs of all public improvements to be constructed and paid for by Developer, construction of all public improvements to be constructed by the City and reimbursed by the Developer in whole or part, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ( "security ") for $610,461.00. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City Engineer approval the security may be reduced from time to time but not more than once every ninety days by ninety percent (90 %) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10 %) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 26. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: City Homes Development, LLC, 3260 West Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1330. 13 W 14 Y; CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. _ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of. Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC a 15 By: Its Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014, by the Chief Manager of City Homes Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said company. NOTARY PUBLIC. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office. Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651 - 452 -5000 16 EXHIBIT A Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, and Outlot A, Acres Dubois, Hennepin County, Minnesota, The torrens portion of which is described as: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Acres Dubois embraced within Lot 17, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WOO That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Acres Dubois embraced within Lots 17 and 18, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ._► 0 That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Acres Dubois embraced within Lots 17 and 18, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract and Torrens Property) 17 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT TO: City of Edina Dear Sir or Madam: No. _ Date: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) ' b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on December 31, 2015. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one -year terms unless, at least forty -five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty -five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. Edina Minnesota-55424 and is actually received by the City Manage at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. L" Its 18 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 Michael Mergens and Michael Meents, two of owners of Red's Savoy, introduced themselves, descri boor pizza offerings, and invited all to enjoy their lunch buffet. VIII. C. ORTS DOME, OUTDOOR RINK AND ARENA IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET EST/M UPDATE AND B/ UTHORIZATION — APPROVED Parks & RecXdd or Kattreh displayed renderings of the site and scribed the location of proposed bue aisles and access points. She presented th onstruction budget estimates dated Octobbruary 2014, noting the estimates were se with the exception of the East Arena Ice Eq0,000 to $1,770,293) and site work 1,746,507). Overall the net project difference of s sed on the design /developm process being complete and 60% of the design documents being complete. s. Kattreh stated this imate does include $500,000 proposed as an alternate for a Kevlar dome covering, me insulation, new soccer fields at the Arena site. The Council considered options to mitigate t7ft. $ million overrun that resulted from site conditions. Ms. Kattreh stated the Pamela Park project appe be about $500,000 under the projected budget. This savings would be gained by creating a hig uality g s field rather than a sand /peat field and to slightly expand the width (20 -25 feet) of the a ' icial turf field. a Council raised the option of deferring Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Ms. treh stated that was option for the Edinborough locker room project and would save approxi ely $500,000. She explaine at while not a contractual obligation, the Edina Swim Club was expe ng that work to be completed this y Another option was to eliminate the outdoor refrigerated ri o save approximately $1.5 million. In response to the C cil's questions, Ms. Kattreh stated this project was not i e CIP at this time and bonds had not be sold or a levy established to pay for these improvements. The uncil expressed a reluctance to kerycost ing locker room improvements and asked Ms. Kattreh to provide a rec mendation on Xotion savings. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Memb Swenson, dvertisement of bid package one for Sports Dome, outdoor rink, and arena projec . le, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland ett ied. Member Swenson was excused from th e meeting at 10:40 p.m. VIII.D. FINAL PLAT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND PRESERVATION EASEMENTS — ACRES DUBOIS, FRANK SIDELL, PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN LITTEL STREET AND MORNINGSIDE ROAD, RESOLUTION NO. 2014-20 — ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague presented the final plat, development contract, and preservation easements (tree and slope preservation easement) for Acres Dubois. He advised the final plat was consistent with the approved preliminary plat and drainage and utility easements had been expanded to accommodate an updated stormwater management system that would include an underground infiltration system that could infiltrate all storms up to the 100 -year event. The Council noted that Lots 5, 6, 7 and part of 8 were part of the Slope and Tree Preservation Easement and the number of trees to be preserved was reduced from 86 to 10. Mr. Teague indicated that was correct. With regard to the Morningside sidewalk, he explained it would be subject to the same construction rules and if damaged, would have to be replaced by the new property owner. City Engineer Millner suggested adding that requirement to the Development Agreement. Peter Knaeble, Terra Engineering, Inc., stated the grading plan remained the same as when approved and was subject to the final house plan. Mr. Teague explained the general grading plan would be done as part of the road construction and the Engineering Department would review grading for individual sites. Mr. Panes R Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 Knaeble stated the easement would be recorded against the property so grading was not allowed within that easement. If the lot was not encumbered by the slope easement, grading would be allowed. Frank Sidell, property owner, explained that after inspection, the number of trees to be preserved was lowered based on the relative health of the tree stock. The focus was to protect trees on the slope and an aggressive replacement strategy was included in case a tree had to be removed. Mr. Sidell stated his intent to involve the City Forester to select a tree species should a tree be replaced. At the request of the Council, he described the stormwater management system that included an infiltration tank under the newly constructed road to contain all drainage on site. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -20, Approving a Final Plat for Acres Dubois, subject to the following conditions: 1. Park dedication fee of $10,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the District's requirements. b. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and for each individual home construction. d. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. e. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. f. The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration shall be subject to approval of the Director of Engineering. g. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. And to also approve the Development Contract and Tree and Slope Preservation Easement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes:. Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. .E. SOUTHDALE MEDICAL BUILDING, 6525 FRANCE AVENUE —AMEND CONDITIONS OF APPRO O BUILD THE PROOF -OF- PARKING PLAN, RESOLUTION Nd. 2014 -21— ADOPTED Mr. Teagu esented an amendment to the approved plans for the addition to the S ale Medical Office Building to d the proof of parking plan (fifth level) and not build the and ound parking level; and, to extend the seco hird, and fourth levels of the office building o e loading dock area. If approved, the footprint of the would remain the same, the num f proof -of- parking stalls would still exceed City Code, the square foo f the building would ain the same, and building materials would be repositioned but remain the same. James O'Shea Collaborative Design Group repre ing So le Medical, provided a slide presentation depicting the exterior building fagade as p ously approved an requested revision that resulted in creating a plaza between the two b ' ings. He stated the finis hes not changed and the building remained well within setbacks. O'Shea reviewed parking statistics, no there would be 17 more parking spaces than requir The Council sta!te409S1pport for the proposed revision that would bring the building into scale t indicated there was UpKfor additional screening or decorative skin on the parking ramp facing Drew Ave e. Mr. O'Shea ted impact was added to the 66th Avenue side based on Council comment and to m a pe trian connection at the point of entry. In addition, the glass element at the corner of the parking flected the glass corner of the office building. Mr. O'Shea stated if treatment was added along Drew Page 9 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) 9-e V 1s-e_j 9 /) tp l C:31 0 1 L� (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ACRES DUBOIS ADDITION CONTRACT dated , 2014, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and CITY HOMES DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer'). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for the Acres DuBois Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "plat "). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it at the time of application for the initial grading permit, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within one (1) year after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, as evidenced by grading, utility or building permits or other written authorization to proceed, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been 172823A Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2)• the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat, has been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City's Community Development Director has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For five (5) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in\ writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, and not in conflict with any portion of the development already completed or under construction, to the full extent permitted by state law; the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. S. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A — Final Plat Plan B — Acres DuBois Preliminary Plan Set Plan C — Final Construction Plans and Specifications 6. IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AND PAID FOR BY DEVELOPER. The Developer shall construct and pay 100% of the cost of the following improvements in accordance with the development plans: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Sewer System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter 172823v4 2 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) F. Landscaping G. Street Lights H. Underground Utilities I. Surveying and Staking J. Site Grading, Stormwater Treatment/Infiltration Basins, and Erosion Control K. Sidewalks L. Setting of Iron Monuments 7. DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENT. Improvements required by this Contract to be constructed by the Developer shall be installed in accordance with plans approved by the City and in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, regulations and policies. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance, as stated in Section 9, Engineers Record Drawings. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City's inspectors and engineers. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on -site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule pre- construction meetings as necessary to coordinate the work and to allow the City to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in good and workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No material deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the City. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the Contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered 172823A 3 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this Contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first ordered in writing by the City Engineer as provided in the specifications. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed following site grading, utility and street construction. 8. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION/ CONSTRUCTION COSTS. The Developer shall pay a fee for in -house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's in -house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and street construction and will be billed on hourly rates The Developer improvements cost breakdown is: o Street Construction $171,005 o Site Grading $162,000 o Storm Sewer $125,200 o Sanitary Sewer $ 81,225 o Watermain 42 980 Estimated Construction Cost $582,510 Estimated City Engineering Fees (6 %) $34,951 Total Estimated Construction Cost 6 0 46 9. ENGINEERS RECORD DRAWINGS. The Developer's engineer shall prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record 172823v4 4 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) Drawing requirements, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," showing those approved changes made during the construction process, based%on the marked up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to the Developer's Engineer. The Record Drawings shall be submitted prior to the Developer receiving an occupancy permit for anybuilding 10. CONTRACTORS /SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and; other entities Jn;:which such individuals have greater than a twenty -five percent (25 %) ownership interest or -in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 6 above. 11. PERMITS: The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits or as needed, including but not limited to: A. Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains B. MPCA NPDES Permit for Construction Activity C. MPCA for Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal D. City of Edina for Building Permits E: MCES for Sanitary Sewer. Connections F. Minnehaha Creek for Watershed Permit The City shall provide cooperative assistance in securing permits from other agencies. 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements and other work required by this Development Contract by October 31, 2016. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 172823v4 5 v Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) 14. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading drainage and erosion control plan, Plan B ". -The plan shall conform to City's Design and Construction Manual.,, Within thirty (30) days after completion,of the grading,tthe Developer shall provide-the City with a "record" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all' ponds, swales, and,ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "record "plan shall contain site. grades and field 'verified elevations of the following: a) cross. sections of ponds b) location and.'elevationsi along all swales,: emergency overflows, wetlands, wetland',mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas /stockpiles; c)' lot corner' elevations and house pads; d) top and bottom of retaining walls. 15:. EROSION CONTROL: Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the,Developer and inspected and approved\by the City: 16. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall 'be responsible for all street maintenance until the public streets are accepted by the City. Warning :signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be` barricaded and closed. In the event that any building or residential unit is occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to insure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the plat clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow,from the streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City a ' shall' not'be responsible for repairing the streets because of snow plowing operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. The Developer shall contract.for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the development... At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City 172823A 6' Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) before grading is started. The contract shall provide that the City may direct the contractor to clean the streets and bill the Developer. 17. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required 'by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become, City, property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: - Contractor's Certificate - Engineer's Certificate - Land.Surveyor's Certificate - Developer's Certificate certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Contract. All necessary forms will be furnished by the City. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed public improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "record" plans, an electronic file of the "record" plans in accordance with the City's Design and Construction Manual. � � ' 18. PARK DEDICATION. The property within the Plat has already paid park dedication for 6 lots. The Developer shall make cash contribution of $10,000 to satisfy the City's park dedication requirements, calculated at the rate of $5,000.00 /unit x 2 units. Payment is due at the time prior to City execution_ of the final plat. 19. BUILDING PERMITS /CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. Breach of the terms of this Contract, by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties and the halting of all work in the plat. B. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer-and water connection permits may be 1.72823v4 7 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) issued until. the streets ''needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City,Engineer. 20.. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Beginning afterfinal approval has been granted by the City and except as "otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City including but.not limited to legal, engineering and inspection expenses in connection with the ongoing 'development 'of the plat, the enforcement of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the plat. The City's costs„ and expenses must be agreed to in writing by the. developer before the City starts any, work. B. The ,Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustairied or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay, or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. D. Each party shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the other for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within sixty (60) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per year. E. In addition to the charges referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ( "SAC ") charges` and building permit fees.. REC fees will not be required due to the developer installing the watermain and sanitary sewer system. 21. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the comments in the March 22, 2013, (Revised 3 -27 -2013) memorandum from the Director of Engineering to the Community Development Director. 172823x4 8 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) B. City of Edina Resolution 2013 -39 C. Developer must provide a tree and slope preservation easement to the City to preserve the steep slopes on the site and the 10 mature trees identified in the Preliminary Tree Preservation plan simultaneous with the recording of the final plat. D. Approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and compliance with the District's requirements. E. The Developer shall construct of a 4 or 5 foot wide sidewalk either within the right- of- way on the west side of the public street or such other location approved by the City Engineer. If the sidewalk is not constructed within the right -of- way the Developer shall, prior to construction of the sidewalk, convey to the City an easement over the area where the sidewalk is constructed. The easement must be in a form approved by the City Attorney. F. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan and is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. G. Developer shall provide a construction management plan to the City for the overall development of the site at the time of application for the initial grading permit and for each individual home construction prior to issuance of a building permit. H. Utility hook -ups are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer I. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road simultaneous with the recording of the final plat. J. Developer must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street within the Plat and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration is subject to approval of the City engineer. (Letter of Credit) K. Developer must install a stop sign on the new street within the Plat approaching Morningside Road at a location approved by the City Engineer. Clear site lines shall be maintained from the intersection. 172823v4 9 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) L. Developer shall grade Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's 1 st Addition in accordance with the approved grading plan. Upon completion of grading the Developer shall reestablish turf on the graded property in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction, 2014 edition. Turf shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. Any replacement turf shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. M. The new roadway within the Plat shall be built to City standards, which is 28 -ft back of curb to back of curb. N. Developer must install signage stating "No Parking Fire Lane" along one side of the new road within the Plat the entire length of the road, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshall. O. Developer shall install fire hydrant(s) near the end of the cul -de -sac and possibly at the intersection of Morningside, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshall. P. Developer must remove the existing home on the south side of the property within the Plat and all accessory buildings located within the Plat. Q. Developer shall maintain the storm water features located within the Platted area for a period of three years following final acceptance after construction. After the period of three years it will be the responsibility of the City for maintenance. 22. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells, assigns, transfers or conveys one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. The Developer shall notify the City when it sells, assigns, conveys or transfers any of its rights, title or interest in the site. B. In compliance with the Response Action Plan approved by the MPCA for the property, the developer shall remove and properly dispose of any environmental contamination within the plat. C. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of 172823v4 10 Item VIII. D. Approve Development, Contract (Revised Contract) Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design .engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in this Contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. D. Developer shall take out and maintain or, cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims forproperty damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly, employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence. The City' shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer shall file with the,'City. a :certificate.:evidencing -coverage at the time of application 'for the initial grading permit. E. Third parties shall have. no recourse against the City under this Contract. F. If,.any, portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. G. The action or inaction of the' City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action -to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiveror release. H. This Contract shall run with Lots 1 -7 of the plat and maybe recorded against Lots 1- 7. In the "event this Contract is recorded, the City covenants to .provide a recordable Certificate of Completion promptly upon the completion of the work.required herein. The Developer covenants with. the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to Lots 1 -7 of the plat; that -there are no 172823v4 11 Item VIII., D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) unrecorded interests in Lots 1 -7; and that the Developer will' indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. I. Each,.right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to-every other right, power'or remedy, express or` implied, now or- hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth'' or otherwise so existing may exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the'.right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right; power or remedy. a 23. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, 'perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred -by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the, City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty -eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other, remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 24. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all public improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to Section 6 of this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either a warranty /maintenance bond for 100 0/6. of the cost of the improvements, or a letter of credit for twenty -five percent (25 %) of the amount of the original cost of these improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials -an,d workmanship for the utility contractor installing,public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B.' -The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete .curb and gutter; sidewalks and trails, retaining walls, materials and equipment shall be subject4o I ne (1) year from the date of final-written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all 172823v4 12 Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract . (Revised Contract) r, work, including street construction", concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of two (2). years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is two growing seasons following installation. } 25. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract by the Developer payment of the costs of all public improvements to be constructed and paid for by Developer, construction of all public improvements to be constructed by the City and reimbursed by the Developer in whole or part, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto; from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ( "security ") e for $610,461:00. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any:violation,of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City,may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that work has been completed' and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City Engineer approval the security may be reduced from time to time but not more than once every ninety days by ninety percent (90 %) of the financial obligations that have. been satisfied. Ten percent (10 %) of the amounts certified by the. Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments, for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required "record" plans have been received bythe;City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 26. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: City Homes Development, LLC, 3260 West Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416. Notices to the City shall be in writing-and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 West. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1330. 172823v4 13 CITY OF EDINA BY: (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) James Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 172823v4 14 i Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) ' } DEVELOPER CITY HOMES DEVELOPMENT, LLC By: Its Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of. 2014, by the Chief Manager of City` Homes Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said company. w DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651- 452 -5000 172823v4 NOTARY PUBLIC A 15 d, A Item VIII. D. Approve Development Contract (Revised Contract) EXHIBIT A Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, and Outlot A, Acres Dubois, Hennepin County, Minnesota, The torrens portion of which is described as: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Acres Dubois embraced within Lot 17, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. F., part of Lot 5, Block 1, Acres Dubois embraced within Lots 17 and 18, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. D That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Acres Dubois embraced within Lots 17 and 18, Block 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract and Torrens Property) 172823v4 16 TO: City of Edina Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause; "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated , 2 of (Name of Bank) b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on December 31, 2015. This Letter of Credit .shall automatically renew for successive one -year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by.certified mail; postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty =five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street.: Edina Minnesota 55424 and is actually received by the City Manage at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of ,Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: 172823v4. Its 17, To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 16, 2014 Subject: Correspondence. Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. 01 eaa Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 - - - -- Original Message-- - From: Kathleen O'Dea (mailto:kodea.mn @email.coml Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 201411:05 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Pis forward To: City Council Re: 66 West am proud to live in Edina. Thorough and thoughtful °decision process. Job well done. Thank you. Kitty Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: To: MayorJim Hovland From: Shen.ehon Company Date: September 2, 2014 Robert Strachota <value @shenehon.com> Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:13 PM Edina Mail Beacon Project Memorandum Beacon Project Memorandum I have discussed the approval process for MHFA,tax credit financing with several affordable housing developers. The funding cycle typically occurs two times per year. From what I have been told, it is nearly certain that Beacon does not have the tax credits in hand. The next funding cycle is late October / early November 2014. It is then that Beacon would submit their project for funding. The high cost of the project per dwelling unit is a highly risky feature of this project. I will discuss more about this later in the memorandum. The suggestion that Beacon will lose the tax credits if Edina does not approve this project now is a pressure tactic. Beacon does not have the credits yet. They hope to get approved this fall but the high cost of the project is a serious issue and might cause the project to be denied. However, a suburban project in Edina is rare so the high cost might be overlooked unless there is a less expensive property to accomplish the project. Beacon will tell MHFA this is the best deal that they could get done in Edina and MHFA will not know about other options unless someone else speaks up. It is true that the TCF parcel is the only Edina project Beacon could get approved in this funding cycle because a different parcel would have to be in the next funding cycle. But if there is another parcel with a lower cost and MHFA knew the City Council was prepared to approve the lower cost project, it would be highly likely the MHFA would approve a different project in the next funding cycle. The Commissioner of MHFA wants to be a good custodian of public dollars. So If the same project can be done on an Edina HRA parcel with fewer subsidies, MHFA would be highly motivated to wait and fund the project in the next cycle. The Commissioner of MHFA would be most interested to know that the Mayor and City Council support the project. The high cost of this project and the non - conformance with existing zoning are important issues in an environment of limited resources. Edina's willingness to involve the HRA and to facilitate a lower cost property will not be known by MHFA unless the Mayor calls the Commissioner. Beacon will not offer the MHFA any alternatives because this is the one they have submitted and will get paid a healthy development fee when.approved. I believe with a little more time and the Edina HRA involvement, a lower cost; parcel with suitable zoning can be secured. It would be a win/win for Beacon, the church, MHFA, the Planning & Zoning Department and the neighboring commercial properties to TCF. Of course, the Council must stay committed to the affordable project because unfortunately, some NIMBY'S will show up for any subsidized project. MHFA Commissioner is Ms Mary Tingerthal at 651 - 296 -5738 Regards, 1- Bob Strachota I President KENEHO: ySR1•icRa�o4 �1 U1F►7c ¢d11,6i9(?�r' 88 South 10th Street, Suite 400 Minneapolis;'MN 55463 O 612.333.6533 F 612.344.1635 shenehon.com Heather Braniain From: Todd Olson <todd @metrocitiesmn.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:13 PM To: steve .albrecht @ci.bumsville.mn.us; dallendorf @eminnetonka.com; sarntz @waconia.org; kasher @cityofdchfield.org; gbarone @eminnetonka.com; michelle .beaulieu @ci.stpaul.mn.us; sasha .bergman @minneapolismn.gov; brooke.bordson @metc.state.mn.us; fboyles @cityofpriorlake.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Edina Mail; (brown @shorewoodpw.com; heather. butkowski @ci.lauderdale.mn.us; bob .cardinal @ci.maplewood.mn.us; hcorcoran @lmc.org; scott.cordes @ci.stpaul.mn.us; steve.elkins @metc.state.mn.us; dannaelling @hotmail.com; dannaelling @hotmail.com; afinn @lmnc.org; treidel @yahoo.com; mary.gaasch @ci.lauderdale.mn.us; banderson @newportmn.com; edwinagarcia44 @gmail:com; egarcia @cityofrichfield.org; info @ci.apple- valley.mn.us; info @ci.apple-val ley.mn.us; info @ ci.apple - valley.mn.us; garyhansen @istcounsel.com; ghansen @cityofeagan.com; tharmening @stlouispark.org; Edina Mail; phynes @lmc.org; cjohnson @lmc.org; dan.kealey @ci.bumsville.mn.us; kkeel @bloomingtommn.gov; jkeely @ci.blaine.mn.us; cm.knight @andovermn.gov, kbev @hotmail.com; katie.knutson @ci.stpaul.mn.us; dlaufenburger @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; mleek @shakopeemn.gov; lei m .lindquist @ci.rosemount.mn.us; alindstrom @lmc.org; dean.lotter @newbdghtommn.gov; Ijl @sppa.com; scott.lund @fridleymn.gov, scott.lund @fridleymn.gov; citizen.servic @ci.stpaul.mn.us; john.maczko @ci.stpaul.mn.us; mmaloney @shoreviewmn.gov, mmcneill @ci.shakopee.mn.us; mmornson @hopkinsmn.com; poehme @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; loren.olson @minneapolismn.gov, candy.petersen @ci.north- saint- paul.mn.us; jdpetryk @gmail.com; jdpetryk @gmail.com; gene.ranieri @minneapolismn.gov, mddley @cityofeagan.com; councilmemberryan @ci.brooklyn - center.mn.us; councilmemberryan@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us; john.sachi @southstpaul.org; ssandahl @cityofdchfield.org; suesanger @comcast.net; judd.schetnan @metc.state.mn.us; jschmeeven @aol.com; duane .schwartz @ci.roseville.mn.us; ward4 @ci.stpaul.mn.us; dswanson @ci.blaine.mn.us, mtilley @cityofeagan.com; mtilley @cityofeagan.com; btjornhom @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; btjornhom @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; kevin.watson @cityvadnaisheights.com; ady @adywickstrom.com; susan.young @ci.forest- lake.mn.us; Iziegler @lmc.org Cc: Laurie Jennings; Charlie Vander Aarde; Patricia Nauman Subject: 2014 Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Members Attachments: meeting 3 packet.pdf To: Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Members From: Todd Olson Attached are the materials for our final Transportation and General Government Policy Committee meeting, next Monday, September 8th, from 11:00 —1:30 at the LMC Building located at 145 University Ave W in St. Paul 55103. We will be hearing from Amy Vennewitz from the Metropolitan Council who will provide an update on the Transportation Policy Plan from 11:00 - 12:00. Parking is available in the lot located on the west side of the building. Make sure you sign in with the LMC front desk when you arrive. Please take the time to read through the policies before the meeting. Please come with your ideas and suggestions. We will provide Subway again or feel free to bring your own lunch. September 2, 2014 Transportation ,& General,Government Policy Committee Members Scott Lund,. Committee Chair`and Mayor of Fridley Meeting Notee and Agenda - Monday, September 8, 2014 11:00 a.m. —1:30 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: p.m. Attached are the materials for the final Transportation and General Government Policy Committee meeting, next Monday. September 8. from 11:00 am -1:30 pm, at the LMC Building located at.145 University Ave Win St. Paul 55103. Parking is available in the lot located on the west side of the building. Make sure you sign in with the LMC front desk when you arrive. Please take the time to read through the policies before the meeting and come with your ideas and suggestions. We will provide Subway lunches for committee members again. Monday, September 8, 2014 Transportation and General Government Policy Committee AGENDA 1. Call to order. 2. Adopt minutes. 3. SPEAKER:Amy Vennewitz, Metropolitan Council, 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) Draft 4. Discussion of potential policy modifications. 5. Other business. 6. Adjourn. (1:30 p.m.) 1 f (, Agenda Item'2 Transportation and General Government Committee Monday, August 18th, 2014 Minutes The meeting was called to order at 11:05 a.m. Chair Lund welcomed committee members to the meeting and asked them to introduce themselves. Present: Steve Albrecht, Susan Arntz, Michelle Beaulieu, Bob Cardinal, Steve Elkins, Danna Elling Schultz, Mary Gaasch, Mary Hamann - Roland, Gary Hansen, Dan Kealey, Katie Knutson, Denny. Laufenburger, Scott Lund, Paul Oehme, Loren Olson, Gene Ranieri, Sue Sanger, Steve Schmidt, Dick Swanson, Kevin Watson, Ady Wickstrom, Angel Smith, Susan Young Ali Elhassen from the Metropolitan Council's Environment Services Division presented to the committee with an update of the feasibility study in addressing issues in the northeast metropolitan area with respect to water supply. The study was authorized by the Legislature in 2013. Discussion and questions followed. Mr. Olson noted that Metro Cities had received a copy of a letter from the City Engineers group and that the group has asked the Met Council to slow down their analyses on these issues in order to ensure that data are adequate and local professional staff are.appropriately consulted. ; Mr. Lund noted that the memo included a series of policies that staff is recommending could be adopted without amendments: 2 -A, 2 -B, 2 -C, 2 -D, 2 -E, 2 -f, 2 -H, 2 -J, 2 -K, 2 -L, 2 -M, 2 -N, 2 -0, 2 -P. Motion by Wickstrom, seconded by Hamann- Roland, to adopt these existing policies as written. Motion adopted. Mr. Olson discussed policies that had suggested amendments as well as a new policy on water supply. Policy 2 -G, Administrative Fines. Mr. Olson stated that staff is recommending amending the policy to eliminate outdated references. Motion by Wickstrom, seconded by Gaasch to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. Policy 2 -I, Annexation. Mr. Olson noted that staff is recommending eliminating outdated references. Motion by Arntz, seconded by Wickstrom to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. 2 -Q; Water Supply. Mr. Olson stated that per the discussion at the first meeting, staff has drafted a water supply policy for the organization, that is intended to serve as a comprehensive policy. Motion by Wickstrom, seconded by Hamann Roland to adopt the policy. Discussion. Mr. Olson noted that Metro Cities also has a specific water supply policy in the Met Agencies section of our policies. Discussion followed. Ms. Wickstrom suggested removing lines 32 -33 on page 12, which states that the region's water supply is abundant and that we have no widespread shortage. Discussion. Mr. Albrecht suggested that the word "abundant" could be "adequate ". Ms. Nauman noted that staff could reorganize some of the language to ensure appropriate emphasis on the points members are suggesting should be emphasized. It was noted that the policy also does not reference security in terms of supply. Ms. Sanger suggested there should be language promoting conservation efforts. Ms. Wickstrom withdrew her motion. Further discussion followed. Mr. Swanson noted that we need to think about protecting surface water if we are moving toward using more surface water in the region. Ms. Young noted drops in wells, and that changing systems is an expensive proposition. Ms. Arntz questioned where this policy should be located, noting the existence of the water supply policy and some overlap. Chair Lund noted that staff would take the suggestions and discussion, and provide a reworked draft of the policy at the next meeting. Discussion followed regarding transportation policies. Motion by Hamann Roland, seconded by Sanger, to adopt policies 5- E,`5 -G, 5 -H, 5 -I, 5 -J, 5 -K, 5 -L, 5 -0, 5 -P, as written. Motion adopted. Discussion followed on policy 5-A. Motion by Sanger, seconded by Arntz, to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. Discussion followed regarding policy 5 -13. Mr. Olson noted the changes drafted per the last meeting discussion. Ms. Sanger suggested removing lines 14 -16, regarding the Dan Patch line policy and that we should have a study first on the impacts of freight rail. Discussion. Mr. Olson noted our policy does not weigh in on whether to do the line, but to repeal the gag on studying the line. Ms. Wickstrom suggested on line 31 that "transit dependent" should be "transit" and "appointments" should be "destinations ". The committee concurred. After further discussion, motion by Hamann Roland, seconded by Sanger, to set aside the policy. Motion adopted Discussion followed on policy 5 -C. Motion by Sanger, seconded by Arntz, to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. Discussion on policy 5 -D. Mr. Olson noted the new language is clarifying language. Motion by Albrecht, seconded by Arntz, to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. Discussion followed.on policy 5 -F. Motion by Hamann Roland, seconded by Arntz to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. Discussion followed on policy 5 -M. Motion by Young, seconded by Swanson to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. Discussion followed on policy 5 -N. Ms. Sanger suggested that the clause "but not limited to" be inserted on line 35, after "including". Motion by Young, seconded by Sanger to adopt the policy as amended. Motion adopted. The meeting was adjourned at 1:30 p.m. Agendi-1tem 4 . September 2, 2014 TO: Transportation and General Government Policy Committee FROM: Todd Olson, Metro Cities Staff RE: Items for Discussion at September Meeting. At our second meeting, the policy committee discussed at length a number of potential edits and adopted all -but two policies. The amended language is still presented with the adopted strikeouts and underlined new language in this packet. The committee has adopted the following policies: 2 -A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority (St. Paul has requested to re -open this policy to consider an amendment to address a zoning ordinance amendment process issue they are experiencing. The new language is located at the end of the General Government chapter.) 2 -13 City Enterprise Activities 2 -C Firearms on City Property 2 -D 911 Telephone Tax 2 -E 800 MHz Radio System 2 -F Building Codes 2 -G Administrative Fines AS AMENDED 2 -H Residential Care Facilities 24 Annexation AS AMENDED 2-J Housing Ordinance Enforcement 2 -K Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact 2 -L Dangerous Substance Regulation 2 -M Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority 2 -N Organized Waste Collection 2 -0 Election Administration Costs 2 -P Utility Franchise Fees, Accountability and Cost Transparency 5-A Transportation Funding AS AMENDED 5 -C Transit Financing —AS AMENDED 5-D Street Improvement Districts AS AMENDED 5 -E Highway Turnbacks & Funding 5-F 11301 Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials' Role AS AMENDED 5 -G Photo Enforcement of Traffic Laws 5 -H Airport Noise Mitigation 5 -I Cities Under 5,000 Population 54 County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula 5 -K Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads 5 -L Plat Authority 5-M City Speed Limit Control —AS AMENDED 5-N MuDOT Maintenance Budget AS AMENDED . 4 5 -0 Transit Taxing District 5 -P Complete Streets` We have two policies left to consider: 2-Q Water Supply (New policy) — The new policy language was discussed at length and the committee set the policy aside for further consideration with new language requested to address conservation and water quality and to rework the'language address the availability of water now and into the future. 5 -B Regional Transit System — Further changes were recommended by the committee to delete support for repealing the Dan Patch gag order supporting further study of rail safety and congestion issues in the metro area and to clean up the support for coordinating transit issues on the borders of the 1 county metropolitan area with collar counties. We will be hearing a presentation on updates to the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan from the Met Council at the beginning of our committee meeting and have an opportunity to ask questions of Met Council staff on the draft plan. 5 1 General Government (2014) 2 3 2 -A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority —POLICY, ADOPTED 4 5 Metro Cities-opposes statutory changes that erode local control and authority or create 6 additional mandated tasks requiring new "or +added local costs without a corresponding 7 state appropriation or funding mechanism. Metro Cities believes that zoning - decisions 8 should be made at the local level. Metro Cities supports legislation`thaf gives local officials 9 greater authority and discretion to approve variances in order to'remain flexible in 10 response to the unique land :use needs of their own community. 11 12 New unfunded mandates potentially cause increased property taxes which impede cities' ability 13 to fund traditional service needs. To allow for greater collaboration and flexibility in providing 14, local services, Metro Cities also encourages the removal of barriers or hurdles to cooperation and 15 coordination between cities and other units of government or entities. Metro Cities-supports 16 local decision - making authority. 17 18 2 -B City Enterprise Activities — POLICY ADOPTED 19 20 Creation of an enterprise operation allows a city to provide the desired service while maintaining 21 financial and management control. The state should refrain from infringing on this ability to 22 provide and control services for the benefit of community residents. 23 24 Metro Cities supports cities having authority to establish city enterprise operations in 25 response to community needs, local preferences, state mandates or to ensure residents' 26 quality of life. 27 28 2 -C Firearms on City Property — POLICY ADOPTED 29 30 Cities should be allowed to prohibit handguns and other weapons in.city-owned buildings, .31 facilities and parks. This would allow locally elected officials to determine whether to allow 32 permit- holders to bring guns into municipal,buildings, liquor stores, city council chambers and 33 city sponsored youth activities. It is not Metro Cities' intention for cities to have the authority to 34 prohibit legal weapons in parking lots, on city streets, city sidewalks or on locally approved 35 hunting land. 36 37 Metro Cities supports local control to allow or prohibit handguns and other weapons on 38 city -owned property. 39 40 2 -D 911 Telephone Tax — POLICY ADOPTED 41 42 Public safety answering points (PSAPs) must be able to continue to rely on state 911 revenues to 43 pay for upgrades and modifications to local 911 systems, maintenance and operational support, 44 and dispatcher training. 6 2 Metro Cities supports state funding for the technology and training needed to provide the 3 number and location of wireless and`voice over internet protocol (Vol(P) calls to 911 on 4 computer screens and transmit that data to police, fire and first responders. 5 6 2 -E 800 MHz Radio System — POLICY ADOPTED 7 8 Metro Cities urges the Legislature to provide cities with the financial means to obtain required 9 infrastructure and subscriber equipment (portable and mobile radios) as well as provide funding 10 for operating costs, since the,prime purpose of this system is to allow public safety agencies and 11 other units of government the ability to communicate effectively. 12 13 Metro Cities supports the work..of the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (previously 14 the Metropolitan Radio Board) in implementing and maintaining the 800 MHz radio 15 system, as long as cities are not forced to modi "fy their current systems or become a part of 16 the 800 MHz Radio System unless they so choose. 17- 18 2 -F Building Codes — POLICY ADOPTED 19 20 Thousands of new housing units are constructed annually in the metro area. Structural and water 21 intrusion problems have surfaced in many houses and commercial buildings built in the last 20 22 years. These problems have resulted in dissatisfied homeowners and conflicts among the state, 23 builders and cities. 24 25 Metro Cities supports an equitable distribution of fees from the Construction Code Fund, 26 with proportional distribution based on the area of enforcement where the fees were 27 received. Metro Cities fur -ther supports a,joint effort by the. state, cities and builders to 28 collectively identify appropriate uses for the fund, including education, analysis of new 29 materials and construction techniques, building code updating, building inspector training, 30 and development of performance standards and identification of construction "best 31 practices." 32 33 Metro Cities supports including the International Green Construction. Code as an `optional 34 . appendix' to the State Building Code.to allow cities to utilize appropriate parts of those 35 guidelines in their communities. Metro Cities also supports adopting the international 36 energy conservation code to the state building code without amendments. Metro Cities does 37 not support legislative solutions that fail to recognize the interrelationships among builders, 38 state building codes and cities. Metro Cities supports efforts to increase awareness of the 39 potential impacts and benefits of requiring sprinklers in new homes and townhouses, and 40 .supports discussion and the dissemination of information around these impacts via the 41 code adoption process through the Department of Labor and Industry.: 42 43 2 -G Administrative Fines — POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED 44 45 Traditional methods of,citation, enforcement and prosecution have met with increasing costs to 46 local units of government. The .use of administrative fines is a tool to moderate those costs. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Metro Cities - 0. supports the administrative fine authority, eaae4ed in 209, granted to allow cities to issue administrative fines for defined local traffic offenses, but supports further modifications Avg pecessary'to enhance the workability of the authority. Metro Cities continues to support all cities' authority to use administrative fines for regulatory ordinances, such as building codes, zoning codes, health codes, and public safety and nuisance ordinances. Metro Cities supports the use_of city administrative'fines, at a minimum, for regulatory matters that are not duplicative of misdemeanor or higher level state traffic and criminal offenses. Metro Cities also endorses a fair hearing process before a disinterested third party. 2-11 Residential Care Facilities — POLICY ADOPTED Sufficient funding and oversight is needed to ensure that residents living in residential care facilities have appropriate care and supervision, and that neighborhoods are not disproportionately impacted by high concentrations of residential care facilities. Under current law, operators of certain residential care facilities are not required to notify cities when they intend to purchase single - family housing for this purpose. Cities do not have the authority to regulate the locations of group homes and residential care facilities. Cities have reasonable concerns about high concentrations of these facilities in residential neighborhoods, and additional traffic and service deliveries surrounding these facilities when they are grouped closely together. Municipalities recognize and support the services residential care facilities provide. However, cities also have an'interest in preserving balance'between group homes and other uses in residential neighborhoods. Providers applying to operate residential care facilities should be required to notify the city when applying for licensure so as to be informed of local ordinance requirements as a part of the application process. Licensing agencies':should be required to notify the city of properties receiving licensure.to be operated as residential care facilities. Metro Cities supports statutory modifications to require licensed agencies and licensed Providers that operate residential care facilities to-notify the city of properties being operated as residential care facilities. Metro Cities also supports the establishment of non- concentration standards, similar to those allowed for the core cities, for residential care facilities to prevent, clustering and require the appropriate county agencies to enforce these rules. 2 -I Annexation —POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED A 2006 Muniraipal Beundai-y AdjustmeRt Task For-ee was rhafged with developing better- eseffmmaieate and jointly plan peteential, m"i"e-6fie: . Attempts have been made in recent years to reduce tensions between cities and townships around annexations. A Municipal Boundary Adjustment Task Force, whose work was published in 2009, worked to develop 8 1 recommendations regarding best practices annexation training for city and township officials to 2 better communicate and Jointly plan potential annexations. While the task force was able to 3 define the differences between cities and townships on the issue of annexation, no significant 4 advancements were made in creating best practices. 5 _.. 6 Metro Cities supports continued legislative efforts to develop recommendations regarding 7 best practices annexation training for city and township officials to better communicate 8 and jointly plan potential annexations. Further, Metro;Cities supports substantive changes 9 to the state's annexation. laws that will lead to better land- use,.planning, energy 10 conservation, greater• environmental protection, fairer tax bases, and fewer conflicts 11 between townships and cities. Metro Cities also supports technical annexation changes that 12 have been agreed to by cities and townships. 13 14 24 Housing Ordinance Enforcement - POLICY ADOPTED 15 16 In 2008, the Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled in Morris v. Sax that certain provisions of the 17 city of Morris' rental housing code were invalid because there were subjects dealt with under the 18 state building code an d the city was attempting to regulate these areas "differently from the state 19 building code." Minnesota Statutes section 1613.6s subdivision l states: 20 21 "The state building code applies statewide and supersedes the building code of any municipality. 22 A municipality must not by ordinance or through development agreement require building code 23 provisions, regulating components or systems of any residential structure that are different from 24 any provision of the state building code." 25 26 Metro Cities supports the ability of cities to enforce all housing codes passed by a local 27 municipality to maintain its housing stock. 28 29 2-K Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact — POLICY 30 ADOPTED., 31' 32 Many'issues.including, but not limited to, the implementation of a metropolitan area 33 groWidwater"monitoring network, emerald ash borer eradication and the cleanup of stone -water 34 retention ponds, come,with_ significant local. costs, and have impacts that reach beyond municipal 35 boundaries.. 36 37 Metro Cities supports the availability of statewide funding sources to address local issues 38 that have regional or statewide significance. Metro Cities opposes the requirement of 39 enacting ordinances more restrictive than state law in exchange for access to these funds. 40 41 2 -L Dangerous Substance Regulation — POLICY ADOPTED 42 43 In metropolitan regions where most cities; share boundary lines with other cities, local bans of 44 dangerous products and substances 'do not eliminate access to these products unless all cities take 45 the same regulatory action. 46 9 1 In circumstances where there is broad local support fora ban, and any regulatory issues under 2 consideration are regional or statewide in nature, as evidenced by recent synthetic marijuana and 3 analog drug situations, Metro Cities supports statewide regulation and prohibition of 4 products or substances found to present a danger to anyone who uses them. 5 6 2-M Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority — POLICY ADOPTED 7 8 Cities are authorized to enact ordinances that disallow the placement of private wells within city 9 limits to ensure bothwater safety and availability for residents and businesses. Municipal water 10 systems are financially dependent upon users to operate and maintain the system: A loss of 11 significant rate payers as a result of unregulated private well drilling would economically 12 destabilize water systems and could lead'to contamination of the water supply. 13 14 Metro Cities supports current law authorizing cities to regulate and prohibit the placement 15 of private wells within municipal utility service boundaries and opposes any attempt to 16 remove or alter that authority. 17 18 2-N Organized Waste Collection — POLICY ADOPTED 19 20 Cities over 1,000 in population are required by law to ensure all residents have solid waste 21 collection available to them. A city can meet the statutory requirement by licensing haulers to 22 operate in an open collection system, authorize city employees to collect waste, or implement 23 organized collection through one or multiple haulers to increase efficiency, reduce truck traffic 24 and control costs to residents. 25 26 Metro Cities supports new laws enacted during the 2013 legislative session to streamline 27 statutory requirements to allow cities tdworkwith existing haulers.to achieve the benefits 28 of organized collection or investigate the merits of organized collection without the 29 -pressure of a rigid timeline and requirement.to pass `an intent to organize' at the beginning 30 of the discussion process. Metro Cities opposes any legislati on that would further increase 31 the „cost or further complicate the process cities are required to follow to organize waste 32 collection or prohibit cities from implementing or using organized waste collection. 33 34 2-6 Election Administration Costs —POLICY ADOPTED 35 36 Cities play a critical role in managing and ensuring the integrity of elections. Any changes made 37 to election laws to implement a voter ID require ment should not place undue financial or 38 administrative burdens on local governments. Any additional costs brought on by election law 39 changes should be the responsibility of the state. 40 41 Metro Cities also supports the adoption of legislation to establish early voting as an 42 alternative to no excuse absentee voting. Early voting has'been proven to be a cost effective 43 and efficient process in other states by reducing the burdensome administrative mandates . 44 as required for absentee ballots. 45 10 1 2 -P Utility Franchise Fees, Accountability and Cost Transparency — POLICY 2 ADOPTED: 3 4 Minnesota cities are - authorized,by Minnesota statutes M.S. 216B and 301B.01 to require a 5 public utility (gas or electric) that provides services to the city or occupies the public right of 6 way within a city to obtain a franchise. Several metro area cities have entered into such . 7 agreements which require that the utility pay a fee to help offset the costs of maintaining the 8 right of way. 9 10 Cities are also adopting energy policies that often result in the use of renewable energy resources 11 to light or heat public facilities. Policies and programs have also been instituted in cooperation 12 with the public utility franchisee to increase energy efficiency for all users. Cities also contract at 13 city expense with public utilities to "underground" wires. 14 i5 The State of Minnesota has also adopted . legislation that requires energy companies to provide 16 more of its electric energy from renewable sources. The specific amounts vary by type of utility. 17 18 Metro Cities supports: 19 20 State policies adopted by legislation or through rules of the Public Utility Commission that 21 provide cities with the authority to include city energy policies and priorities in a franchise 22 or similar agreement with a franchisee. 23 24 Greater accountability and transparency for city paid costs associated with underground 25 utility and similar work performed by electric utilities as part of a local project, 26 2 -Q WATER SUPPLY —(NEW POLICY) 27 Municipal water suppliers are charged with meeting the water supply needs of their communities 28 and attempt to'.do so with safe, reliable and cost effective systems that are sustainable both for 29 established cities and for all future growth: 30: The aquifers in the metropolitan area cross municipal boundaries and therefore require a 3.1 coordinated re 'offal approach to planning for its future availability. Currently, gpproximately 32, 75 %0 of municipal water supply in the metropolitan area comes from groundwater. With proper 33 management of the resource, the current water supply in the region is adequate, however, 34 Metropolitan Council projections predict localized declines in aquifer availability due to 35 population growth estimates if current usage levels are maintained: 36 Regulation of water is complex and compartmentalized: Various agencies permit its use, plan 37 for its availability, regulate stormwater, treat wastewater and protect the safety of water. To 38 ensure that water supply: remains adequate and sustainable across the region, we must understand 39 how much water can be sustainable drawn from the aquifers and what effect increases in re-use, 40 conservation and recharge can'have on the sustainability and availability of both groundwater 41 and surface water. Many of these'strategies cross agency jurisdictions and will require improved 42 coordination and cooperation. 11 1 Municipal water suppliers have made' significant infrastructure investments in their systems 2 based on calculated water availability and DNR'p I its.', Prggosals-to reduce the reliance on 3 groundwater by switching municipal water systems from groundwater to surface water supplies 4 will come with significant costs. 5 6- 7 8 9 10 11 The outcomes and benefits of re- balancing the mix of groundwater and surface water use for specific municipalities and the region must be identifiable before any projects, are undertaken. including municipal water suppliers, industry, private wells, agriculture, and contamination containment. 12 The metropolitan region must consider the effects of groundwater use beyond the borders of the 13 metropolitan area on there ion's groundwater availability and the cost of treating contaminants 14 in surface water that comes into the metropolitan area for use. 15 Metro Cities supports thexemoval of barriers to wastewater re -use, improved inter - agency 16 coordination, clarifying the roles of local, regional and state governments with respect to 17 water, streamlining and consolidating permit approval processes and the availability of 18 statewide resources to plan for and ensure the future sustainability of water supply in the 19 metropolitan area. Metro Cities also encourages the Met Council to find ways to re -use 20 wastewater as a means to improve conservation, 21 Metro Cities supports the availability of state funds to encourage and promote water 22 conservation as a strategy to improve water sustainabilitv and the availability of state 23 funds to improve and Drotect water aualitv. 24 25 26 Pal 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO POLICY 2-A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority - Metro Cities opposes statutory changes that erode local control and authority or create additional mandated tasks requiring new or added local' costs without a corresponding state appropriation or funding mechanism. Metro Cities believes that zoning decisions should be made at the local level. Metro Cities supports legislation that gives local officials greater authority and discretion to approve variances in order to remain flexible in response to the unique land use needs of their own community. Metro Cities also supports legislation to remove barriers to uniform zoning ordinance amendment processes for all cities, regardless of city size classification. New unfunded mandates potentially cause increased property taxes which impede cities' ability 12 1 to fund traditional service needs. To allow for greater collaboration and flexibility in providing 2 local services, Metro Cities also.encourages the removal of barriers or hurdles to cooperation and 3 coordination between cities and other units of government or entities. Metro Cities supports 4 local decision - making authority. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Transportation (2014) 5-A Transportation Binding —POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED A comprehensive transportation system is vital in planning for and meeting the physical, social and economic needs of our state and metropolitan region. Adequate and stable sources of Under the current financing structure, transportation needs in the metropolitan region continue to be severely inadequate and underfunded. Our transportation funding system relies boat primgrflYon the gas tax for roads and the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) for transit. Automobiles are becoming more fuel efficient and MVST receipts continue to lag behind projections, resulting in funding levels that continually fail to meet demand. residents and businesses and its projected population growth. Funding and planning for our regional and statewide systems must be coordinated at the federal, state, regional and local levels to optimally achieve long term needs and goals. In P fesoufoes: In addition, cities lack adequate tools and resources for the maintenance and improvement of the municipal systems, with resources restricted to property taxes and special assessments. It is imperative that alternative revenue generating authority be granted to municipalities for this purpose to relieve the burden on the property tax system. Metro Cities strongly supports stable and sufficient statewide transportation funding and local tools to meet the long term transportation system needs of the region and local municipal systems. Metro Cities also supports state financial assistance, as well as innovations in design and construction, to offset the impacts of regional transportation construction projects on local communities and businesses. 5 -B Regional Transit System The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area needs a multi -modal regional transit system as part of a comprehensive transportation strategy that serves both commuters and the transit dependent. The transit system should be composed of a mix of HOV lanes, Bus Rapid Transit, express and regular route bus service, exclusive transit ways, light rail transit and commuter rail corridors designed to connect residential, employment, retail and entertainment centers. The system should be regularly monitored and adjusted to ensure that routes of service correspond to the region's changing travel patterns. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '42 43 44 45 46 region's tax is levied in the ffletF8P@l1*tftH aFea and dedieeted to transit. The sales ta* r-epreseqts a to investment to OUF . Metro Cities opposes using the currently dedicated Metropolitan Transportation Area sales tag proceeds to further subsidize operational funding for Metro Transit and suburban transit providers that are the responsibility of the Legislature and Metropolitan Council. Any increase to the sales tag already dedicated to transit should be used to benefit the transit system as a whole. Metro Cities is also opposed to legislative or Metropolitan Council directives that constrain the ability of metropolitan transit providers to provide a full range of transit services, including reverse commute routes, suburb -to- suburb routes, transit hub feeder services or new, experimental services that may show a low rate of operating cost recovery from the fare box. In the interest of safety and traffic management ' . Metro Cities supports:furt her which.theypass. Current congestion levels and forecasted population growth require a stable, reliable and growing source of revenue for transit construction and operations so that our metropolitan region can adequately and strategically meet its transportation needs to remain economically competitive. Metro Cities supports an effective, efficient and comprehensive regional transit system as an invaluable component in meeting the multimodal transportation needs of the metropolitan region and to the region's economic vibrancy and quality of life. Metro Cities supports a regional governance structure that can ensure a measurably reliable and efficient system that recognizes the diverse transit needs of our region and addresses the funding needs for all components of the system. Metro Cities also recognizes the unique needs of cities at edges of the 7- county work with border counties to help coordinate planning so riders can get to destinations beyond the boundaries of the region. 5 -C Transit Financing — POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED The Twin Cities metropolitan area is served by a regional transit system that is expanding to include rail transit and dedicated busways. Any operating subsidies necessary.to support this system should come from a regional or statewide funding source. The property taxpayers of individual cities and counties should not be required to fund the operation of specific transit lines or routes of service within this regional system. MVST revenue projections have not been reliable and the Legislature has repeatedly reduced general fund support for Metropolitan 15 1 Transit. As a result the regional transit providers continue to operate at a funding deficit. 2 3 Shifting demographics in the metropolitan region will mean increased demand for transit 4 in areas with and without current transit service. Metro Cities supports stable and growing 5 revenue sources to fund the operating budget for all regional transit providers at a level 6 sufficient to meet the growing operational and capital transit needs of the region and to 7 expand the system to areas that currently have little or no transit options. 8 9 Metro Cities supports an increase in the regional sales tax to fund the expansion of regular 10 route service, the continuing capital expenses and expanded operational needs of the 11 metropolitan transit system if the increase is accompanied by sufficient local controls over 12 the collection and expenditure of the new revenue and geographic balance is maintainers in 13 the expansion of service to allow cities to appropriately plan for growth in population and 14 service needs along new and expanded transit service. Metro Cities opposes diversions of 15 the uses of this tax for any other purposes. 16 17 5-D Street Improvement Districts — POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED 18 19 Funding sources for local transportation projects are limited to the use of Municipal State Aid 20 (MSA), property taxes and special assessments, and cities under 5,000 in population are not 21 eligible for MSA. With increasing pressures on city budgets and limited tools and resources, 22 cities are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain aging streets. 23 24 Street improvement districts allow cities in developed and developing areas to fund new 25 construction as well as reconstruction and maintenance efforts. 26 27 The street improvement district is designed to allow cities, through the use of a fair and objective 28 fee structure, to create a district or districts within the city where fees will be raised on all 29 properties in the district, and that must be spent within the boundaries of the district. Street 30 improvement districts would also aid cities under 5,000, giving them an alternative to the 31 property tax system and special assessments. 32 33 Metro Cities supports the authority of local units of government to establish street 34 improvement districts. Metro Cities also supports changes to special assessment laws to 35 make assessing state -owned property a more predictable process with uniformity in the 36 payment of assessments across the state. 37 38 5-E Highway Turnbacks & Funding— POLICY ADOPTED 39 40 Cities do not have the financial capacity, other than significant property tax increases, to absorb 41 the additional roadway responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing municipal 42 turnback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turnbacks. 43 44 Metro Cities supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads on a phased basis 45 using functional classifications and other appropriate criteria subject to a corresponding 46 mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and continued maintenance. 16 2 Metro Cities does not support the wholesale turnback of county or state roads without the 3 consent of municipality and the total cost, agreed to by the municipality, being reimbursed 4 to the city in a timely manner. 5 6 5 -F 113C" Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials' Role — POLICY 7 ADOPTED AS AMENDED 8 9 The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) was developed to meet federal requirements, 10 designating the Metropolitan Council as the organization that is responsible for a continuous, 11 comprehensive and cooperative (3C) transportation planning process to allocate federal funds 12 among metropolitan area projects. Input from local officials is an important element in the 13 planning and prioritization of transportation investments in the region. 14 , the 1998 15 , 16 , 17 18 Metro Cities supports continuation of the TAB with a majority of locally elected officials as 19 members and participating in the process. 20 21 5-G Photo Enforcement of Traffic Laws — POLICY ADOPTED 22 23 Enforcement of traffic laws with cameras has been demonstrated to improve driver compliance 24 and safety. 25 26 Metro Cities supports the use of photo enforcement technology. 27 28 5-H Airport Noise Mitigation — POLICY ADOPTED 29 30 The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and the state should seek long -term solutions to 31 fund the full mitigation package as adopted in 1996 for all homes in the 64 -60 DNL impact area. 32 Noise abatement efforts should be paid for by fees and charges collected from airport users, as 33 well as state and federal funds. Furthermore, unless mitigation funding is provided, Metro Cities 34 opposes any legislation that requires a property owner to disclose those properties that lie within 35 64 -60 DNL noise contours. 36 37 Acknowledging that the communities closest to MSP and reliever airports are significantly 38 impacted by noise, traffic, and other numerous expansion - related issues: 39 40 Metro Cities supports the broad goal of providing MSP - impacted communities greater 41 representation on the MAC. Metro Cities wants to encourage continued communication 42 between the MAC commissioners and the cities they represent. Balancing the needs of MAC, the 43 business community and airport host cities and their residents requires open communication, 44 planning and coordination. Cities must be viewed as partners. with the MAC in resolving the 45 differences that arise out of airport projects and the development of adjacent parcels. Regular 46 contact between the MAC and cities throughout the project proposal process will enhance 17 1 communication and problem solving: 2 Metro Cities supports noise abatement programs and expenditures to minimize the impacts 3 of MAC operated facilities on neighboring communities. The -MAC should`determine the 4 design and geographic reach of these programs,only. after'a thorough public input process 5 that considers the priorities and concerns of impacted cities and their residents. 6 7 5-I Cities Under 5,000 Population - POLICY ADOPTED 8, 9 . Cities under 5,000 in population do not directly receive any non - property tax funds for collector 10 and arterial streets. Current County State Aid Highway (CSAH) distributions to metropolitan 11 counties are inadequate to provide for the needs of smaller cities in the metropolitan area. 12 Possible funding sources include the five- percent set -aside account in the Highway User Tax 13 Distribution Fund, modification to county municipal accounts, street improvement districts, 14 and /or state general funds. 15 16 Metro Cities supports establishing criteria, such as the number of average daily trips, to 17 provide funding qualifications and a distribution method, in a small city local road 18 improvement program. 19 20 54 County State Aid highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula — POLICY ADOPTED 21 22 Even with the additional resources provided in 2008 by the Legislature through the 23 transportation finance bill, significant needs remain in the metro area CSAH system. The 24 additional revenue for the CSAH system will result in more projects being completed faster, 25 however, greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in cost sharing 26 activities, encumbering an already over - burdened local funding system. When the alternative is 27 not building or maintaining roads, cities bear not only the costs of their local systems but also 28 pay upward of fifty percent of county road projects. Metro Cities supports special or additional 29 funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost participation in county road projects. 30 31 CSAH eligible roads were designated by county engineers in 1956 and although only 10% of the 32 CSAH roads are in the metro area, they account for nearly 50% of the vehicle miles traveled. 33 The new CSAH formula passed by the Legislature in 2008 increased the amount of CSAH 34 funding for the metropolitan area only from 18% in 2007 to 21% in 2011. The new formula will 35 better account for needs in the Metropolitan Area, but the new formula must only serve as is a 36 first step in providing additional resources for the Metropolitan Area. 37 38 Metro Cities supports a new CSAH formula more equitably designed to fund the needs of 39 our metropolitan region. 40 41 5-K Municipal InputlConsent for Trunk Highways and County Roads —POLICY 42 ADOPTED 43 44 Minnesota Statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)'to submit 45 detailed plans with city cost estimates at a point one and a half to two years prior to bid letting, at 46 which time public hearings are held for citizen/business /municipal input. If MnDOT does not 18 1 concur with request ed :changes, it may appeal. Currently, that process would take a maximum of 2 threes and. a half..moriths.and the results of the appeals board are binding on both the city and 3 MnDOT. 4 Metro Cities opposes chariges ;to, current statutes that would allow MnDOT to disregard the 5 appeals board ruling for state tr; "unk highways. Such a change would significantly minimize 6 MnDOT's need to negotiate in good faith with cities for appropriate project access and 7 alignment, and would render the public.hearing and appeals process meaningless. Metro 8 Cities also opposes the elimination of the county road municipal consent and appeal 9 process for these reasons. 10 11 5 -L Plat Authority — POLICY ADOPTED 12 13 Current law. grants counties review and comment authority for access and drainage issues for city 14 plats abutting county roads. 15 16 Metro Cities opposes any statutory change that would grant counties veto power or that 17 would shorten the 120 -day review and permit process time. 18 19 5 -M City Speed Limit Control — POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED 20 21 Cities are moving to incorporate multiple modes of transportation within existing right of way 22 through local Complete Streets policies on residential roads where traffic safety also affects 23 pedestrians and users of alternative transportation modes. Metro Cities supports design 24 standards that result in slower speeds on local roads. Any statutory speed limit change 25 must be uniform and provide adequate state funding for education and enforcement to 26 ensure public awareness and compliance. 27 28 At cities' or counties' discretion, Metro Cities also supports a year round reduction of speed 29 limits within 500 feet of any city or county parks and schools or on roads whose characteristics 30 are becoming more residential or developed but will not yet justify a reduction under a NmoT 31 sanctioned speed study. 32 33 5-N MnDOT Maintenance Budget — POLICY ADOPTED AS AMENDED 34 35 The state has abrogated its responsibility for maintaining major roads throughout the state by 36 requiring, through omission, that cities bear the burden of maintenance on major state roads. 37 Cities should be compensated equitably forproviding a service that traditionally has been borne 38 by the state. MnDOT should also be required to meet standards adopted by cities through local 39 ordinances or reimburse cities for labor, equipment and material used on the state's behalf.to 40 improve public safety or meet local standards. 41 42 Metro Cities supports MnDOT taking full responsibility for maintaining state owned 43 infrastructure and Property, including; but not limited to, sound walls and right of way, 44 within city limits. 45 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 5-0 Transit Taxing District— POLICY ADOPTED The transit taxing district, which funds the capital cost of transit service in the Metropolitan Area through the property tax system, is inequitable'. Because the boundaries of the transit taxing district do not correspond with any rational service, line nor is being within the boundaries a guarantee to receive service, cities inthe taxing district or out of the taxing district are contributing unequally to the transit service in the Metropolitan Area. This inequity should.be corrected. Metro Cities' supports a stable revenue source to fund both the capital and operating costs for transit at the Metropolitan Council. However, Metro Cities does. not support the expansion of the transit taxing district without a corresponding.inerease in service and an overall increase in operational funds. To do so would create additional property taxes without a corresponding. benefit. 5-P Complete Streets — POLICY ADOPTED A complete street may include:. sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes and more. A complete street in a rural area will differ from a complete street in a highly urban area, but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road. Metro Cities supports options in state design guidelines for streets that would give cities greater flexibility to: • safely accommodate all modes of travel • address storm water needs • ensure livability'in the appropriate context for each city. However, Metro Cities opposes state imposed mandates that would increase street infrastructure improvement costs in locations and instances where providing access for alternative modes including cycling and walking are deemed unnecessary or inappropriate as determined by local jurisdictions. 20 Heather Branigin From: Wayne Freeman <wayne @exsmn,com> sent Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Edina City Council Mayor James Hovland and the Edina City Counsil; My Wife Sandy and I have lived in 3 residences in Edina.since 1967. We have also owned two businesses, both of which have had locations in Edina since 1967. This is the first time in 47 years I have written the Mayor and City Counsil. Vam writing this on the behalf of myself and the fellow residents of the Highlander Townhomes on Cahill Road just south of 70th Street. The "re is currently road work on Cahill Road about 5 blocks south of -our development. There is a sign titled "Road Work Ahead which is in a very dangerous position as Highlander Townhome residents try to drive out of our development. The sign blocks the -view of north bound traffic. It is impossible to tell if there is another vehicle coming. Since many people speed on- Cahill Road, this could lead to an accident. There is no reason that the sign could not be moved an additional 20 feet south of where it is. I moved this heavy sign myself, just to have some person (I can only assume a City.of Edina employee) move the sign back. 1 did place a call to City Hall, and nothing has.'happened. Please take the time to see that this sign is moved so that the residents of Highlander Townhomes are safer. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Yours truly, Wayne and Sandy Freeman Heather Braniain From: Sheriff Stanek <Sheriff.Stanek @hennepin.us> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 3:25 PM Subject: SAVE THE DATE: Ribbon cutting Oct. 3 Hennepin County Sheriff's Office 911 Emergency Communications Facility Please join us for a ribbon cutting ceremony for the new Hennepin County Sheriffs Office 911 Emergency Communications Facility. The •`''' ceremony takes place on Friday, October 3 at 10:30 a.m. The new facility is located at 1245 Shenandoah Lane. Plymouth, MN (adjacent to the Hennepin County Adult Corrections Facility in Plymouth). More information will be sent to closer to the date. SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: INTERACT WITI-1 HENNEPIN COUNTY: Unsubscribe /update preferences I Contact Hennepin I GovDelivery help I Register for Citizens Academy This email was sent to Email Address using GovDelivery, on behalf of: Hennepin County - 300 South Sbrth Street • Minneapolis, MN gOVDEL/VERY� 55487 •612 -348 -3000 gel the word auL Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 1 Heather Branigin From: Alison Pence <akpence @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 4:01 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland and Councilmembers Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson, I am. Writing to express my support for the rezoning of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan to accommodate the request by the Beacon Project to acquire the property at 66 West and convert it into studio apartments for homeless youth. Homelessness is an issue that is affecting all communities and lthb Edina/Rilchfield/Bloomington area is no different. The component that makes me�strongly support,this;prograrp is'the support services that this organization will be bringing'with it. That tells me that this project takes on more of a "teach to fish" model, rather than "give a fish ", which is truly the only way that an issue such as homelessness will be effectively reduced. Thank you, Alison Pence 5904 Tamarac Lane Edina 1 Heather Braniain From: bthacherbell @comcastnet Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 4:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Becky Organization: resident Website: Address-1: 6305 Rose Ct Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: bthacherbell@comcast.net Phone: 952 474 3343 Referrer: google Message: My husband and I recently moved to Edina and have been following the Beacon Interfaith Housing Proposal. We were impressed that residents will be encouraged to complete their education and find jobs. We are in support of the proposal at this time. 1 Heather Branigin From: Allan Johnson <allanjohnsommn@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please do not support the homeless youth facility Dear Mayor, Please do not support the homeless youth facility at the TCF location on 66th street. This is not the right location. . Allan Johnson 6566 France Ave Edina, MN 55435 Heather Braniain From: Jim Korslund <korslund @me.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 02,2014 IOAS PM To: Edina Mail Subject: we support 66 West Please know that my family & I fully support the rezoning request in favor of 66 West (Beacon Interfaith) to support affordable lousing HERE, in Edina. I'd be happy to 'have this in our town! Pm an active parishioner at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, and we, as a parish, support this as well. Please vote to approve this request. We'll be noting your actions. -- Jim Korslund 4666 Casco Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Jim Korslund m) +1 320 260 8911 korslund@me.com Heather Branigin From: Cindy Meuwissen <cmmeuwissen @comca.st.net> Sent: Wednesday,.September 03, 2014 5:41 AM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmaii.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail subject: Proposed housing, project - Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative As an owner of a condominium at The Colony at Edina, l am not in favor of this project moving into my neighborhood. The number of female residents of various ages, with or without small dogs is huge. There are also residents with small children. While we should never take safety for granted, this has been a very safe neighborhood, and based on statistics at their Minneapolis Beacon housing site, there are 14 visits by police per month. This is horrible! I'm all for helping young people; I do help young people. Dropping a bunch of young people into housing without close supervision is ridiculous and a recipe for disaster for residents and business owners in the area. Thank you. Cindy Meuwissen Owner of 6320 Barrie Road, #16 Edina, MN 55343 952 - 220 -1727 1 Heather Branigin From: Margaret Shaw <margaretshaw @edinarealty.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 201410:37 AM . To: sean.broom @mail.house.gov; johnpaul.yates@ mail. house.gov; rep. pa ul.thissen @house:mn; rep.frank. horn stei rig house. mn; sen.scott.dibble @senate.mn; sen.melisa.franzen @senate.mn; betsy.hodges @minneapolismn.gov; Edina Mail Subject: Thanks For Your Leadership TO: U.S. Representative Keith Ellison U.S. Representative Erik Paulsen Paul Thissen, Minnesota Speaker of the House of Representatives State Senator Scott Dibble State Senator Melisa Franzen State Representative Frank Hornstein Mayor Betsy Hodges, City of Minneapolis Mayor James Holvand, City of Edina John Quincy, Minneapolis City Council Linea Palmisano, Minneapolis City Council Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Scott Neale, City Manager, City of Edina.Loren Olson, Policy Aide John Dybvig, Policy Aide CC: Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Al Franken Governor Mark Dayton Thank you for your leadership with the airport issues. The recent FAA announcement indicating that they will not implement Area Navigation (RNAV) departure routes at MSP would not have been possible without representatives like you and the community coming together in a unified front to find a solution. We look forward to your active leadership as we continue to push for other changes impacting this issue, including: - Mandating an environmental impact study (EIS) for all changes at MSP - land and air - Changing how noise is measured to be fair for all our neighborhoods - Creating a long -term statewide aviation plan that addresses the inevitable airport growth at MSP - Our community is always better when we come together. Thanks, again, for all you do. Regards, Margaret Shaw marearetshaw@edinarealtv.com 4611 Lakeview Drive Edina, MN 1 Heather Branigin From: Suzanne Kerwin < skerwi n@comcast. net> Sent Wednesday, September 03, 201411:00 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Candidate Forums Please forward to the Mayor, Council and members of Boards and Commissions. Thank You, Suzanne Kerwin League of Women Voters Edina. if i e ue f 1`olnen v atbrs of `i�ctina Candidate Forums Monday, September 22 7:00pm, House District 49A candidates 8:00pm House District 49B candidate Edina City Hall, Council Chambers Tuesday, September 30 7:00pm Edina City Council candidates Edina City Hall, Council Chambers The forums will be rebroadcast on EDINA 16 and will be available for online viewing on the city's website, edinamn.gov. Sponsored by the League of Women Voters Edina. For more information, please visit www.lwvedina.ore. The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non - partisan political organization that encourages the informed and active participation in government, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. 1 Heather Braniain From: Maura Schnorbach <`mschnorbach @stpatrick - edina.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 201411:30 AM To: Allison Johnson; Andrea Knoll (aknolll @comcast.net); Anne Shea; Angela Butel ( Angela .Bute) @cctwincities.org); Bernie Beaver (bbeaver44 @gmail:com); bill dubbs (dubbs @williams- exec.com); bjones @colonialchurch.org,'` bfvolunteers @breakingfree.net; boosmith@mindspring.com; Cathy Burley (Cathy.abcexpress @gmail.com); Lisa Thompson (cre8vtype @gmail.com); Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @man h.com); Cappy, cgodsall @live.com; Dick Ward work (DWard @doughertymarkets.com); Debbie Burns,. Homes for All (Dan@ mnhomelesscoalition.org); Katie Gebhard; Evans, Marcia ( Marcia.Evans @ParkNicollet.com); Dennis Femkes; frattei @stpetersedina.org; Gertrude Brixius, 'GerryRevier' (Gerryj7 @gmail.com); Susie Van Hoomissen; Mollie Sherry, Helen Wood (Hwood.md @gmail.com); Brian Rusche, JRLC (info @jrlc.org); Kathleen Groh (kgroh @ivcusa.org); kmcelrath @comcast.net, Kathy Tomlin; Lynn Wangen (lewangen@msn.com); Lisa Walker ( Lisa .Walker @hopkinsschools.org); Marty.Roers @cctwincities.org; Mary Everett, megmannix @comcast.net; Melissa Miller (melissamiller @olgparish.org); Edina Mail; Nancy Maeker, Jeffrey Ochs (ochs0021 @umn.edu); Pat & Jim Jenkins, Patrick Witherow; Pat & Susan Downey, Rena Turnham (turnham @bitstream.net); Ratelle, John (John.Ratelle @marsh.com); Roxann Metz (secretary.lccr @me.com) (secretary.iccr @me.com); Mary and Chris Riley; rasandilla; sward5 @comcast.netr Roxann Metz (secretary.lccr @me.com) (secretary.lccr @me.com); Theresa Smith; teresapolson @comcast.net; Taige.Thornton @nseds.com; Tom Niedzielski; Jim Wangen (wangen @msn.com); wagnerosa @usinternet.com; Bill and Claudette Lucas (wclucas @msn.com) (wclucas @msn.com); Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @manh.com); Imorsewendt @ecic.org; Betsey Violante (beviola @aol.com); Bob Hobbins; glas5716 @stthomas.edu; Jane Wyatt (Wiz); Mary Schad; Nancy Jurkovich; Steve Yanda; Sue Stenbeck (sstenbeck @comcastnet); arethlake @comcast.net; Gwen Hagen; jim glick; jim wangen; kelly Nitschke; Marcella Daimazzo; mary everett; matt houchin; Bob Busch; Colleen Sherry, Dan McMahon; David Cherne; Jim Mader, Mollie Paulson; Anita Valliere; Diane R. Kuehl; Jan Collins; Joe Klos; Judy, &'Bill Cunningham; Brad Huard; Danielle Baas Molliver; Elizabeth Fairbain; Janice Anderson; Jason Wittak; Julie Madden; Marge Virnig; Marion Clark; Mary Pat Potts; Nancylloyd; roxanne smith; Suzanne Belongia; andy wolf; dryhaug; Jaclyn Parell 0leparell @gmaikom) ; joey herring; kelly hayes; kris Hayes, michelle herring; morgan girard; neuberger, timmy odenbach Cc: Timothy Rudolphi; stpatrick @stpatrick - edina.org Subject: 66 West Passed! Good morning 66 West supporters! We won a big victory last night! 66 West was unanimously approved at the Edina City Council meeting. This represents a three year commitment by Edina Community Lutheran Church and Beacon Interfaith Housing to provide housing for, "precariously" housed or homeless young adults in Edina. Their efforts to build a coalition of support with churches and members of the community resulted in unprecedented turnouts at the City Planning'Commission and City Council meetings. There were hundreds of supporters at each of these meetings. Over the last several months in addition to countless hours spent searching for and securing a site, preparing architectural drawings, meeting with members of the City of Edina. staff and Planning Commission members, Mayor and members of the Edina City Council, there was endless stream of mail, email and phone calls to our elected officials. In total, there were more than 500 individuals who contacted the City of Edina in support of the project! Thank you! I cannot recall meetings that l have attended in which there were so many, "Roman Collars"... It was incredible to see the support across denominations for an important project like 66 West., This level of community support doesn't happen by accident! It happens because a group, of individuals with passion, vision and dedication work tirelessly to build a ground campaign that creates incredible momentum! Winning is a team sport! But, every team needs coaches and captains! Thanks to Edina Community Lutheran for their g g i g ' g witness to the lives of young people living in poverty! And, unflinching courage in standin in their truth and bearin wit showing all of us a way to work together to_make something big happen in Edina. Our congratulations goes to Beacon for, "lighting" the way with an amazing team, leadership and political savvy! They built a solid foundation for the project! And, they showed our City Council that it was not only the, "right" thing to do, but it was the, "right" time to do it.' There were so many of you that helped in so many ways! St. Patrick's Social Justice, "Shout Outl" to our Social Justice Commission for saying, "Yes!" to.the project and showing up to testify on behalf of the projectl We are grateful to Fr. Tim for not only saying, "Yes!" but for testifying tool We had great staff support tool We also appreciate all of the leadership from community organizations and individuals who worked tirelessly to, "move the needle:' I am also grateful for all of the notes of encouragement, phone calls and prayers..., There are lots of prayer warriors! Tough decisions like 66 West take courage... Please take a moment to thank the Mayor and members of the City Council for, "bringing it home l" The biggest winners will be the young adults who will get the launch they deserve! We will need all of your support in the coming months! This is just the beginning! But, right now we will savor the victory! Thank you for being a champion for justice! Best, Maura Schnorbach Social Justice Coordinator Saint Patrick's Catholic Church. (952)941 -3164, ext.142 mschnorbach@stpatrick- edina.ore Heather Braniain From: Maura Schnorbach < mschnorbach @stpatrick- edinaorg> Sent: Wednesday,. September 03, 201411:49 AM To: Edina ' "I Cc: Steve Yanda; Bob Hobbins; Timothy Rudolphi; Allison Johnson; Imorsewendt @ecic.org Subject: Thank you! Good morning Mayor and Edina City Council Members, On behalf of the Office of Social Justice at St. Patrick's, I wanted to thank you for unanimously passing 66 West! This was a big night for the Social,Justice Community. I also see this as a big, "winl" for our community. It shows what is possible when the community galvanizes to support an important, ground breaking project! But the biggest winners of all will be the young adults who will get a chance to have a home and to build a new life! A project like 66 West does not happen without individuals like you who are elected to create a broad vision for what is possible in our city. It is also a reflection of months of work by not only the lead.organizations, Beacon and Edina Community Lutheran, but Edina City staff members and the Edina Planning Commission and the Edina City Council. We are grateful for all of the hard work and leadership across all city agencies, including engineering and the police department too! We are grateful that the Edina Comprehensive Plan will include affordable housing for young adults. As Councilmember Bennett shared last night, it is a, "living document!" You have created a plan that can respond to changing needs in the community and seize the moment of opportunity. Truly the, "stars" aligned! As I have shared at St. Patrick's, I believe that 66 West is the right project at the right time with the right people! We are proud to be a part of a community that in its pursuit of excellence in all areas, creates a space for those who are seeking a better life and simply need a chance to make it a reality! We are confident that this will =be an exciting opportunity for Edina and another great community asset! Thank you for your passion and commitment to creating a flourishing community for all! Best, Maura Schnorbach Social Justice Coordinator Saint Patrick's Catholic Church (952)941 -3164, ext.142 mschnorbach@stpatrick- edina.ors 1 Heather Branigin From: Bill and Lu VanBenthuysen <billandluvan @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 03,2014 11.55 AM To: - -. Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennett12 @ comcast.net; joshsprague@edinarealty.com Subject: Thank you! Thank you for your courage and foresight in the approving of 66Westl Lu VanBenthuysen, Edina 1 Heather Braniain From: James Cross <james.crossmn @comcastnet> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 201412:02 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West votes -- a HUGE THANK YOU! Mayor Hovland and Councilmen, A quick note to thank you for your approval to proceed to the next step of Beacon's 66 West project: This was my first City Council meeting and I was impressed with the process and mostly the thoughtful discussion and comments from each of you. This is an excellent project and a great location and as was stated last night, will impact hundreds of young adults in just the -first five years. I am sure you are getting a -mails today from those that disapprove of your vote but I truly believe when these young people occupy the building, there will be a feeling of "what was all the fuss about" Again, thank you. Jim Cross 5928 Abbott Ave S, Edina 612- 205 -6199 1 Heather Braniain From: Judy Semsch <jbs1949 @hotmail.com> Sent Wednesday, September 03,,201412:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you! We are so pleased with your decision to approve the Apts for homeless young people in the Edina location. Thank you for your thoughtful and thorough approach to this issue. Sincerely, Mike and Judy Semsch St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, Edina MN Judy Semsch 1 Heather Braniain From: sueward92458 @gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 201411:53 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West My husband Dick and I watched the.Council meeting'last night on television. I thought you and the whole Council did an excellent job of addressing concerns from the Project's opponents but not letting those concerns derail the project. I volunteer with kids up at the High School that will benefit from a place like 66 West. You made us proud to be from Edina and to say that we supported .your campaign and have always voted for you. Thank you for all you do to make Edina a place to be proud of. Sue Ward 6809 Galway Drive Sent from Windows Mail hi i Heather Branigin From:, Dennis Femkes <fern7313 @scc net> Sent: Wednesday; . September 03;, 201412:21 PM To: Edina Mail; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Joni Bennett Subject: Thank you for your support of 66 West Thank you to Mayor Hovland:and the other city council members for your support of the 66 West project. The lives of many young people will be forever changed as a result of your confidence in them. Dennis Fernkes, Edina resident - Sent from my iPad. Heather Branigin From: Lonni Skrentner <lonni.skrentner @gmail.com> Sent Wednesday, September 03, 20141:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank You! Please forward to all city council I am enormously proud to be an Edinan today, after you unanimously approved the 66 West complex! I've always hated NBOY arguments, and I'm glad we didn't fall for them! The old TCF building is a perfect spot for this. Be proud! Lonni Skrentner 1 Heather Branigin From: Marty Roers <Marty. Roers@cctwincities.org > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:32 AM To: 'Maura Schnorbach'; Allison Johnson; Andrea Knoll (aknolll @comcast.net); Anne Shea; Angela.Butel; Bernie Beaver (bbeaver44 @gmail.com); bill dubbs (dubbs @williams - exec.com); bjones @colonialchurch.org; bfvolunteers @breakingfree.net; . boosmith@mindspring.com; Cathy Burley (Cathy.abcexpress @ gmail.com)," Lisa Thompson (cre8vtype @gmail.com), Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @manh.com); Cappy; cgodsall @live.com; Dick Ward work (DWard @doughertymarkets.com); Debbie Bums; Homes for All ( Dan@ mnhomelesscoalition.org); Katie Gebhard; Evans, Marcia ( Marcia.Evans @ParkNicollet.com); Dennis Fernkes; frattei @stpetersedina.org;`Gertrude Brixius; 'Gerry Revier' (Gerryj7 @gmail.com); Susie Van Hoomissen; Mollie Sherry; .Helen Wood (Hwood.md @grinail.com); Brian Rusche, JRLC (info@jrlc.org); Kathleen Groh (kgroh @ivcusa.org), kmcelrath @comcast.net; Kathleen Tomlin; Lynn Wangen (lewangen @msn.com); Lisa Walker ( Lisa .Walker @hopkinsschools.org); Mary Everett; megmannix @comcastnet; Melissa Miller (melissamiller @olgparish.org); Edina Mail; Nancy Maeker, Jeffrey Ochs (ochs0021 @umn.edu); Pat & Jim Jenkins; Patrick Witherow; Pat & Susan Downey; Rena Turnham.(turnham @bitstream.net); Ratelle, John (John.Ratelle @marh.com); Roxann Metz (secretary.lccr @me.com) (secretary.lccr @me.com); Mary and Chris Riley; rasandilla; sward5 @comcast.net; Roxann Metz (secretary.lccr @me.com) (secretary. lccr@ me.com); Theresa Smith; teresapolson @comcast.net, Taige.Thomton @nseds.com; Tom Niedzielski; Jim Wangen .(wangen @msn.com); wag nerosa @usi ntemetcom; Bill and Claudette Lucas (wclucas @msn.com) (wclucas@msn.com); Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @manh.com); Imorsewendt @ecic.org; Betsey Violante (beviola @aol.com); Bob Hobbins; glas5716 @stthomas.edu; Jane Wyatt (Wiz); Mary Schad; Nancy Jurkovich; Steve Yanda; Sue Stenbeck (sstenbeck @comcast.net); arethlake @comcast.net; Gwen Hagen; jim glick; jim wangen, kelly Nitschke, Marcella Dalmazzo; mary everett; matt houchin; Bob Busch; Colleen Sherry; Dan McMahon; David Cherne; Jim Mader; Mollie Paulson; Anita Valliere; Diane R. Kuehl; Jan Collins; Joe Klos; Judy & Bill Cunningham; Brad Huard; Danielle Baas Molliver, Elizabeth Fairbain; Janice Anderson; Jason Wittak, Julie Madden; Marge Virnig; Marion Clark; Mary Pat Potts; Nancy Lloyd; roxanne smith; Suzanne Belongia; andy wolf, dryhaug; Jaclyn Parell Oleparell @gmail.com) ; joey herring; kelly hayes; kris Hayes; michelle herring; morgan girard; neuberger, timmy odenbach Cc: Timothy Rudolphi; stpatrick @stpatrick - edina.org Subject: RE: 66 West Passed! Congratulations!!!!! This is wonderful news!!! Marty Roers Parish & Community Education and Leadership Manager Office for Social Justice Catholic Charities of St. Paul and Minneapolis 60 Plato Blvd East, Suite #230 St. Paul, MN 55107 (651)647 -2584 Every day, Catholic Charities serves people like Bob, providing healing and hope. Your support helps make this possible — thank you! From, Maura Schnorbach ( Mailto: mschnorbach @stpatrick -edina.org] Sent, Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:30 AM To: Allison Johnson; Andrea Knoll (aknoll @cwmcast.net); Anne Shea; Angela Butel; Bernie geaver (bbeaver44 @gmail.com); bill dubbs (dubbs @wliliams- exec.com); bjones @colon!alchurch.org; bfvolunteers @breakingfree .net; boosmith @mindspring.com; Cathy Burley (Cathy.abcexpress @ gmail.com); Lisa Thompson (cre8vtype @gmai1:com); Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @manh:com); Cappy; cgodsall @live.coni; Dick Ward work (DWard @doughertymarkets.coril); Debbie Burns; Homes for:All (Dan@mnhomelesscoal!tion.org); Katie Gebhard; Evans, Marcia ( Marcia. Evans@ ParkNicollet.com); Dennis; Fernkes; frattel @stpet:ersedina.org; Gertrude Brlxius; 'Gerry. Revier' (Gerryj7 @gmail.com); Susie -Van Hoomissen; Mollie Sherry; Helen Wood (Hwood.md @gmail.com); Brian Rusche, JRLC (info @jrlc.org); Kathleen Groh (kgroh @!vcusa.org); kmcelrath @comcast.net; Kathleen Tomlin; Lynn Wangen (lewangen @msn.com); Lisa Walker ( Lisa .Walker @hopkinsschoois.org); Marty.Roers; Mary Everett ; megmannix @eomcastnet; Melissa Miller (melissamiller @olgparish.org); mail @edinamn.gov; Nancy Maeker; Jeffrey Ochs (ochs0021 @umn.edu); Pat & Jim Jenkins; Patrick Witherow; Pat & Susan Downey; Rena Tumham (turnham @bitsiream.net); Ratelle, John (John.Ratelle @marsh.com); Roxann Metz (secretary.lccr @me.com) (secretary.lcer @me:com); Mary and Chris Riley; rasandilla; sward5 @comcast.net; Roxann Metz (secretary.lccr @me.com) (secretary.iccr @me.com); Theresa Smith; teresapolson @comcast.net; Taige.Thornton @nseds.com; Tom Niedzielski; Jim Wangen (wangen @msn.com); wagnerosa @usintemet.eom; BIII and Claudette Lucas (wducas @msn.cwm) (wclucas @msn.com); Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @manh.eom); Imorsewendt @ecic.org; Betsey Violante (beviola @aol.eom); Bob Hobbins; glas5716 @stthomas.edu; Jane Wyatt (Wiz); Mary Schad; Nancy Jurkovich; Steve Yanda; Sue Stenbeck (sstenbeck @comcastnet); arethlake @comcastnet; Gwen Hagen; jim glick; jim wangen; kelly Nitschke; Marcella Dalmazzo; mary everett; matt houchin;. Bob Busch; Colleen Sherry; Dan McMahon; David Cherne; Jim Mader; Mollie Paulson; Anita Valliere; Diane R. Kuehl; Jan Collins; Joe Klos; Judy & BIII Cunningham; Brad Huard; Danielle Baas.Molliver; Elizabeth Fairbain; Janice Anderson; Jason Wittak, Julie Madden; Marge Virnig; Marion Clark; Mary Pat Potts; Nancy Lloyd; roxanne smith; Suzanne Belongia; andy wolf, dryhaug; Jaclyn Parell (jleparell @gmail.com) ; joey herring; kelly hayes; kris Hayes; michelle herring; morgan girard; neuberger, timmy odenbach Cc: Timothy Rudolphi; stpatrick@stpatrick- edina.org Subject: 66 West Passed! Good morning 66 West supporters! We won a big victory last night! 66 West was unanimously approved at the Edina City Council meeting. This represents a. three year commitment by Edina Community Lutheran Church and Beacon Interfaith Housing to provide housing for, "precariously" housed or homeless young adults in Edina. Their efforts to build a coalition of support with churches and members of the community resulted in unprecedented turnouts at the City Planning Commission and City Council meetings. There were hundreds of supporters at each of these meetings. Over the last several months in addition to countless hours spent searching for and securing a site, preparing architectural drawings, meeting with members of the City of Edina staff and Planning Commission members, Mayor and members of the Edina City Council, there was endless stream of mail, email and phone calls to our elected officials. In total, there were more than 500 individuals who contacted the City of Edina in support of the project! Thank you! I cannot recall meetings that 1 have attended in which there were so many, "Roman Collars"... It was incredible to see the support across denominations for an important project like 66 West. This level of community support doesn't happen by accident! It happens because a group of individuals with passion, vision and dedication work tirelessly to build a ground campaign that creates incredible momentum! Winning is a team sport! But, every team needs coaches and captains! Thanks to Edina Community Lutheran for their unflinching courage in standing in their truth and bearing witness to the lives of young people living in poverty! And, showing all of us a way to work together to make something big happen in Edina. Our congratulations goes to Beacon for, "lighting" the way with an.amazing team, leadership and political savvy! They built a solid foundation for the project! And, they showed our City Council that it was not only the, "right' thing to do, but it was the, "right' time to do it. There were so many of you that helped in so many waysl St. Patrick's Social Justice, "Shout Out!" to,our Social Justice Commission for saying, "Yes!" to the project and showing up to testify on behalf of the project! We are grateful to Fr. Tim for not only saying, "Yes!" but for testifying too! We had great staff support tool We also appreciate all of the leadership from community organizations and individuals who worked tirelessly to, "move the needle." I am also grateful for all of the notes of encouragement, phone calls and prayers:.. There are lots of prayer warriors! Tough decisions like 66 West take courage... Please take a moment to thank the Mayor and members of the City Council for; "bringing it home!" The biggest winners will be the.,young adults who will get the launch they deserve! We will need all of your support in the coming months! This is just the beginning! But, right now we will savor the victory! Thank you for being a champion for justice! Best, Maura Schnorbach Social Justice Coordinator Saint Patrick's Catholic Church (952)941 -3164, ext.142 mschnorbach @stpatrick- edina.ora Save money and the environment: Don't print this email or its attachments unless you absolutely need a hard copy. Fax and Email Confidentiality Statement: This message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and /or confidential information intended solely for the use of the'addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the message and all copies and backups thereof. Heather Branigin From: laurieb@tcq.net Sent Wednesday, September 03, 2014 2:58 PM To: Edina Mail Dear Mayor and city council members, I thank you for your careful consideration and. courageous vote for the 66 West development. It makes me proud to say that I live in Edina. Respectfully I ��-Ay . n . Heather Braniain From: ckfrisch @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:40 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you, Jim! Dear Jim, Jan and 1. are proud of the Edina City Council for its action last night for youth housing. We are pleased with the success of Nicollet Square and are sure the with.Beacon as the collaborator, beh ind it, this project will be equally beneficial for youth and the southwest suburbs. Thank you for all the patience it took to get to this pointl Carol and Jan Frisch 1 Heather Braniain From: Doris Pagelkopf <dorispagel @gmall.com> Sent 'Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject . . THANK YOU JIM, A HUGE THANK YOU FOR GUIDING THE DEBATE LAST NIGHT. IT WAS THRILLING TO HEAR THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF EACH COUNCIL MEMBER BEFORE THE VOTE. ALL GOOD PEOPLE! Doris Pagelkopf - A MEMBER OF ECLC AND WORKED IN EDINA FOR 19 YEARS. Nonprofit Consultant 16386 Ellerdale Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 952 - 975 -0716 Home office 952 - 847 -3923 Cell 1 Heather Braniain From: Tara Tostenson <tara.tostenson @frauenshuh.com> Sent Wednesday, September 03, 2014 526 PM To: Edina Mail;,jo'nibennettl2@comcast.net Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com, swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: GrandView Phase 1 Frauenshuh Thank You Letter Attachments: 09.03.14 GrandView Phase, l Frauenshuh.pdf Importance: High Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Please seethe attached letter from David Frauenshuh in connection with the GrandView Phase 1 Team Interview yesterday, September 2nd, 2014. Kind regards, Tara Tostenson Assistant to David Frauenshuh 7101 West 78th Street, Suite 100 1 Minneapolis, MN 55439 P: 952 - 829 - 3467.1 Q 612 - 756 -1317 tara.tostensonC@ frauenshuh.com www.frauenshuhcommercial.com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom -it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney- client or any other privilege. FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group 1 September 3, 2014 Delivered via electronic mail Mayor Hovland and City Council Members 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Thank you again for the opportunity to introduce our team for the role as the City's development partner for the GrandView Phase 1 Redevelopment Project. We are committed to working with the City of Edina to create a development plan that embraces the GrandView District Development Framework and will be a catalyst for long term private and public investment in the GrandView District. As mentioned during our interview, we have,conipleted projects incorporating private- public use elements m a variety of ways. We use our internal sources to finance our projects, and offer extensive financial depth and the capacity to complete this project. Where creative financing of .public elements and amenities are needed, we've used private financing and when appropriate, a combination of public tools such as tax increment financing and/or philanthropic sources to achieve desired project outcomes. In our experience, this has' been a proven strategy to achieve alignment and the best outcomes for all interested parties. The GrandView Phase 1 project should reflect the values of our Edina community and be the beginning of the new centerpiece district for the Twin Cities region. We are excited to get started with the City of Edina, its staff and community stakeholders to begin this exciting project. Sincerely, Z4-�� 1"e David R. Frauenshuh CEO and Founder 7101 Went P,Street, Suite 100 M Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 Ef Tel: 952.829.3480 FrauenshuhCommerdal.com Heather Branigin From: malostad @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:42 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you Dear Mayor Hovland, Thanks for supporting 66 West My appreciation for the complexity of the job you do every day has been expanded during this approval process, so my thanks goes well beyond this project You and your colleagues are nothing less than stewards of the city of Edina, rarely an easy job. Thank you for accepting and carrying these responsibilities. It is a gift to all of us. The Rev. Catherine Malotky member of ECLC 1 Heather Braniain From: Robert Hobbins <hobbins.robert@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 8:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you To the Mayor and Members of the Edina. City Council, Thanks to all of you for the careful homework, the discerning thought, and the courage that each of you exhibited in making the decisions last night on the approvals required for 66 West to go forward. It was most edifying to hear you articulate the reasons for your decision, making clear to all that this was the product of a very thoughtful consideration. Robert Hobbins 1 Heather Branigin From: Sue Welna (welavender @aol.com) <welavender @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 201411:13 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcastnet; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: Thank you Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Swenson, Brindle, Bennett and Sprague, Thank you for your unanimous vote in support, of changes necessary to move the Beacon Housing Project forward. It is so gratifying to know Edina is a leader in addressing the needs of homeless young adults.... and in such a profound manner. Well done! Sue and Jim Welna 1 Heather Branigin r From: Nathaniel Bandt < nathanielb20487 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:58 AM r To: swensonannl @gmail.com; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Edina Mail; lisa.obrien @edinaschools.org; david .goldstein @edinaschools.org; sarah.pattloff @edinaschools.org; leny.wallen- friedman @edinaschools.org; regina .nevilie @edinaschools.org; randy.meyer @edinaschools.org; cathy.cella @edinaschools.org; fv superintendent @edinaschools.org; mary.manderfeld @edinaschools.org; bruce.locklear @edinaschools.org Subject: Future of my. Education When do we as students get a say in what we learn? When will our needs be met and we should not be used as a tool for the competition of using our students to get higher marks than all of the other schools? I am just asking because well i feel unfairly treated in the ways I am forced to learn and request a say in my education. 0 1 Lake Harriet Area Regional Sewer Rehabilitation Project - Construction Update August 29, 2094 (all dates are approximate and depend on weather and construction conditions) Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), operator of the metro -area wastewater collection and treatment system, is rehabilitating the aging and deteriorating regional sanitary sewer in the Fulton, Linden Hills and Lynnhurst Neighborhoods of Minneapolis, and a small portion of the northeastern part of Edina. Upcoming Work in Fulton and Linden Hills Neighborhoods Work is expected to start the week of September 8, 2014 at several locations (see figure), starting at 49�' Street and Drew Avenue and proceeding east. This work will involve digging a trench across the street (or alleyway or driveway), installing a temporary pipe section, and covering the excavated area with steel plates. The steel plates will be removed and excavations repaved before the start of each weekend. Work at each crossing will typically take less than one day. Although steel plates will temporarily cover excavations while work is underway, please drive with caution in these areas. No roadway closures are expected at this time, and flaggers will direct traffic around construction. While the work will be noisy, all work is expected to occur during the daytime. Who Should You Contact? For questions or concerns about this work, contact MCES staff: • Tim O'Donnell, Project Citizens Liaison, 651 -602 -1269, tim. odonnell(CDmetc. state. mn. us • Sarah Hachey, Assistant Contract Administrator, 651 - 325 -6219, sarah. hachey(a)-metc. state. mn. us • Dave Elzinga, Construction Contract Administrator, 651 - 602 -8924, david.elzinpa(dmetc. state. mn.us . MCES Lake Harriet Sewer Rehabilitation Project For complaints regarding after -hours construction activity, contact Minneapolis Information and Services by dialing 3 -1 -1 in Minneapolis or 612 - 673 -3000 from cell phones and phones outside of Minneapolis. Additional information about the Lake Harriet Area Sewer Rehabilitation Project will be posted and updated periodically on the Metropolitan Council's website: www. metrocouncil. oro /sewer constructionundates To sign up for project e-mail updates, send an e-mail to MCESLakeHarriet0zanassoc.co1n stating that you would like to receive Lake Harriet Area Sewer Rehabilitation Project e-mail updates. MEoTROPOLcITAN Lake w4nhst 6 Harriet s a W 49th St 3 0 W49th St 49th S1 w49tn irz u � wstm, soths m s a 7 a � � $ a s '� 5 ist5 s a` l = s nd St I i Constructionarea e g I� Trenching batons Slyd S A N For complaints regarding after -hours construction activity, contact Minneapolis Information and Services by dialing 3 -1 -1 in Minneapolis or 612 - 673 -3000 from cell phones and phones outside of Minneapolis. Additional information about the Lake Harriet Area Sewer Rehabilitation Project will be posted and updated periodically on the Metropolitan Council's website: www. metrocouncil. oro /sewer constructionundates To sign up for project e-mail updates, send an e-mail to MCESLakeHarriet0zanassoc.co1n stating that you would like to receive Lake Harriet Area Sewer Rehabilitation Project e-mail updates. MEoTROPOLcITAN Lake Harriet Area Regional Sewer Rehabilitation Project - Construction Update August 29, 2014 (aN dates are approximate and depend on weather and construction conditions) Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), operator of the metro -area wastewater collection and treatment system, is rehabilitating the aging and deteriorating regional sanitary sewer in the Fulton, Linden Hills and Lynnhurst Neighborhoods of Minneapolis, and a small portion of the northeastern part of Edina. Work at 50th Street and Halifax Work is expected to start next week on the comer of 50th Street and Halifax. This work will involve digging a deep shaft and installing equipment to help with temporary water conveyance during the sewer rehabilitation process. This work will require the sidewalk to be closed at the corner of 50th and Halifax to eastbound foot traffic on the south side of 50th Avenue and to north and southbound foot traffic on the east side of Halifax. A detour route for pedestrians will be signed. The area will be fenced off on all sides for safety reasons. Upcoming Work In 50th St. and France Ave. Area Work is expected to begin in mid - September in the 50th Street and France Avenue area. This work will include installing temporary wastewater conveyance pipes, installing a new structural lining inside existing pipes, testing, removing the temporary pipes, and installing a new liner inside existing manholes. Work will start at 49th and France, continue south to 50th Street, and then proceed east along 50 Street to Drew, and north on Drew Avenue. Most of this work will be completed at night (8:30 p.m. to 5 a.m.) to minimize impact to traffic and to businesses in the 50th Street and France Avenue area. While access to water will be maintained, businesses directly along France Avenue, 50th Street, Drew Avenue, 49th Street, and west of Drew Avenue will be asked to refrain from discharging water into the sewer system during the nighttime work hours since the sewer system will be disrupted. Regular water usage and drainage may resume after 5 a.m. until work begins again the next evening. Businesses will be notified 48 hours in advance by project personnel with a door hanger of sewer service disruption. No roadway closures are expected at this time as worts takes place in the center lane of 50th Street and France Avenue. Flaggers will direct traffic through the work site and parking will be periodically prohibited on both sides of Drew Avenue between 49th Street and 50th Street starting next week and lasting until approximately the end of October. Who Should You Contact? For questions or concerns about this work, contact MCES staff. • Tim O'Donnell, Project Citizens Liaison, 651 -602- 1269, tim.odonnell(a)metc. state. mn.us • Sarah Hachey, Assistant Contract Administrator, 651 - 325 -6219, sarah.hachev(ometc. state. mn.us • Dave Elzinga, Construction Contract Administrator, 651 -602 -8924, david. elzinga(cDmetc. state. mn. us For complaints regarding after -hours construction activity, contact Minneapolis Information and Services by dialing 3 -1 -1 in Minneapolis or 612 - 673 -3000 from cell phones and phones outside of Minneapolis. Additional information about the Lake Harriet Area Sewer Rehabilitation Project will be posted and updated periodically on the Metropolitan Council's website: www. metrocouncil. omisewerconstructionu,odates To sign up for project e-mail updates, send an e-mail to MCESLakeHarrietOzanassoc. com stating that you would like to receive Lake Harriet Area Sewer Rehabilitation Project e-mail updates MEoTROPOLcITAN Heather Braniain From: Christopher Rorwick <crorwick @etievents.com> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 9:36 AM To: Edina Mail; Brian Olson Subject: Residential. water leak -for 4 days Importance: High Mr. Olson and Council Members: I live on Glouchester Dr and have been seeking a solution to a neighbor who has water running from their yard _ since at least Monday, possibly as early as Saturday or Sunday. The address is 7213 Glouchester Dr. I am no engineer, but I would estimate the flow at close to 10 gallons per minute. At 5760 minutes in just 4 days, we're talking 57,000 gallons of water that has been flowing. Even if you cut that flow rate in half we're talking about more than 25,000 gallons of water. I called public works on Tuesday morning and was told it was a known issue and that the homeowner was expecting a repair that day. I tried to call again at 4pm to report nothing had been done, but found voice mail. I called Wednesday morning and got the same response, but was transferred to a Manager's voicemail. I have not, received a return call. My question was, and still is, at what point does the city take responsibility for this gross waste of resources? I assume there is some division of responsibility between the city, and homeowner depending on what is actually leaking (it could very well be an irrigation system), but that is no excuse to let it go on. If the homeowner cannot get it repaired in a timely manner, the city must step in and either assist or turn off the water. Please .help me understand the course of action the city will take as we enter the 5th day of flowing water. A photo is attached, and no, the truck with the cones is not there to make this repair, it's servicing a resident across the street. Regards, Christopher Rorwick Event Transportation International, Inc +1.206.774.8410 ofc +1.206.499.8773 mob 1 Heather BrAniain From: LAURA HOPE MELTON <hopemelton @hotmaii.com> Sent: Thursday, September 64,2014 10:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank You for 66 West Vote Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members I Thank you for your compassionate and fiscally responsible affirmative votes for the 66 West project. This is what makes me proud to live in Edina. Sincerely, Hope Melton 1 Heather Branigin From: Olson <joloz3 @comcastnet> sent: Thursday, September 04,201411:18 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re 66 West Jim, Mary, Ann, Joni, and Josh, >> Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, . thank you (one for each of you) for your affirmative vote, supportive words and underlying confidence in the 66 West'project at Tuesday's council'meeting. I am a member of the Edina Community Lutheran Church housing task force and a 5 -0 vote saying yes to 66 West is a powerful testimony to what a caring faith community working together with their elected representatives can do. I live in St. Louis Park and it is important for all of you to know your decision is far reaching. This morning 'my husband happened to be working out with an attorney from Golden Valley and 66 West came up in conversation. This person has not been involved in any way but said he had been following the process and waiting to see the outcome ... his comment was, "I am so proud of Edina!" He relayed that it seems every time a controversial affordable and /or supportive housing project comes up in most of the western suburbs, it is typically defeated. Edina'changed that and it is being seen by many as groundbreaking. I believe, even with the sincere and.valid, opposing comments and arguments, building 66 West on this site in Edina is the right thing to do and this is tfie'right�time to'do it: We still' have a lot of hard work ahead of us and again thank you for us the yes to move forward. As a member of the ECLC task force, the emerging collaboration across the west metro suburban churches and communities has been inspirational, the wise and thoughtful decision making and guidance from city leaders has been remarkable and the community spirit of care and compassion has been hur bling...66 West will make you proud Lois Olson 3917 Lynn Av So., SLP Member, Edina Community Lutheran Church Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Branigin From: Glover, Jonathan <JGlover @krollontrack.com> sent: Thursday, September 04, 201.4.4:45 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Hill, Sara Subject. 15 Acre NE Edina Woods -,Sale by Mpls Dear Council, our family (my wife, Sara, 2 young boys, and one young dog) are residents at 4100 Grimes Avenue. It was with some alarm that I read the recent Strib article (http: / /www.startribune.com /local /west /273501931.htmi indicating: 1. Mpls is proposing to sell the 15 acre parcel of land;it owns located in NE Edina /SE SLP for development; but 2. Is offering it first for sale to SLP and /or Edina;,and .3. Per Scott Neal "We don't think we should pay anything for it" Perhaps Mr. Neal's statement was in the spirit of bargaining, but;this undeveloped land is invaluable to the residents of the Morningside area (not to mention, Linden Hills and Minikanda Vista, though these last are.not your constituents). This land is simply known as "the woods" to`our.boys, and they revel in exploring it on foot and bike. Its unmanicured condition make it a rare treasure. It's informal but.effective maintenance by some unstated social contract is a credit to the folks who use it and a testament to the high value those residents place upon it. I have always wondered if this happy accident was at least in part fostered by the "Bermuda Triangle" character of this plot where mixed /uncertain property and jurisdictional rights intersect. It has happily enjoyed a status as "no man's land" which has blessed it with being treated as "everyman's land" in the best possible spirit. We passionately support any measures, including purchase which would keep this land undeveloped. I would be grateful to be kept apprised on developments, news or hearings on this issue. November 4, Mpls's stated deadline in the article, is not far off. The deadline may likewise be a bit of bargaining/posturing, and deadlines have been known to be elastic, but the potential loss of this land to more development would inflict an egregious injury to our neighborhood and its residents. Thank you, Jon Glover 952 - 303 =5660 (home) 612 - 803 -2603 (cell) Jonathan L. Glover, Esq., Heather Branigin From: Rena Turnham <turnham @bitstream.net> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:57 PM To: Edina Mail; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: THANK'YOU for saying "YES" to 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Swenson, Brindle, Bennett, and Sprague: Thank you for saying YES last Tuesday night to agreeing to amend the city's comprehensive plan and rezone a property to allow 66 West to.move forward. For the last year, - members of St. Stephen's have worked under the hard - working and steadfast leadership`of,Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative and ECLC to make 66 West a reality. It's been a such a joy to come together on something so worthwhile for the community. We at St. Stephen's intend to be part of the project moving forward, helping with fundraising, supporting tenants however needed and well as helping with neighborhood relations. The success of 66 West matters for these homeless young people, as well as this community. Thank you all for your leadership and the countless hours spent on getting up to speed in ,learning the facts about the project as well as in understanding it from all viewpoints. And it was wonderful that the vote was unanimous! I hope all of these congregations can widen the circle to work with even more congregations, across denominations and with other faiths,.as well as with more community partners and agencies. Clearly, these relationships can make a difference and we intend to continue building on them— around 66 West and beyond. The fabric of this community will be strengthened by it! Gratefully, The Rev. Rena Turnham, Deacon at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church -Edina 4439 50th St W, Edina, MN 55424 cell: 612 -308 -1898 Heather Branigin From: Neville, Regina < Regina .Neville @edinaschools.org> Sent: Thursday, September.04, 2014 6:13 PM To: Nathaniel Bandt, swensonannl @gmail.com; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl24comcastnet; Edina Mail; Obrien, Lisa; Goldstein, David; Patzloff, Sarah; Wallenfriedman, Leny; Meyer, Randy, Cella, Cathy, Superintendent; Manderfeld, Mary; Locklear, Bruce; Brott,.Susan Subject: RE: Future of my Education Dear Nathaniel, On behalf of the school board, thank you for your email regarding education at Edina Public Schools. You ask relevant questions about choice and individualized learning that are at the core of . Edina's mission, "All for All As parents of Edina students and as community members committed to the importance of education, I can assure you that we take our governance role 'seriously and value your perspective. Dr. Locklear is an excellent resource to address immediate "concems at the high school. As a board we appreciate your questions as a.guide for the decisions we'will make about the direction of learning in Edina Public Schools. Thanks once again for taking the time to write. Best regards, Regina Neville Edina School Board Clerk From: Nathaniel Bandt < nathanielb20487 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:57 AM To: swensonannl(a)emaii.com; ioshsprague @edinarealty.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; ionibennettl2 @comcast.net; mail @edinamn.eov; Obrien, Lisa; Goldstein, David; Patzloff, Sarah; Wallenfriedman, Leny; Neville, Regina; Meyer, Randy; Cella, Cathy; Superintendent; Manderfeld, Mary; Locklear, Bruce Subject: Future of my Education When do we as students get a say in what we learn? When will our needs be met and we should not be used as a tool for the competition of using our students to get higher marks than all of the other schools? I am just asking because well i feel unfairly treated in the ways I am forced to learn and request a say in my education. , i -r EaJ6.;,,p�� diil}�j NA 'mow )' ai ..^fie'+ C �� :_ J� _ �'• "�s'� ' y � :. �s) �`� �`� � �v "�` ^ EVNTM WE An Tw �, - � Chi. -��� c o '.y„ \� � f -�•� ..i �j �.� 1 � � � /1 \ � �� 9 rve,� c c BUILDING FORWAM 607 WASHINGTON AVENUE • SUITE100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 September 4, 2014 (612)630.2450 (612)630.2453 FAX Mayor James Hovland WWW.GRECOLLC.COM Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: GrandView Redevelopment - Public Realm Discussion Honorable Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members: We appreciate the time we were given to present our qualifications for the Grandview Redevelopment and the interactive dialogue and questions. Our presentation was primarily focused on the Phase One project area for a residential development as defined in the overall plan. From the comments we heard it appeared that we adequately covered our qualifications in housing development but more detail would have been appreciated for the broader master plan and our ideas for the "public realm." Prior to the interview we had discussed the current plan and a number of ideas for the public areas that could support the development. To address the questions presented to us at the interview we prepared the attached site plan and narrative to share in more detail our thoughts for addressing the "public realm" in the overall development plan. Hopefully the City will accept this submittal as an elaboration of our ideas for the overall project potential as your partner in the development. As the center of Edina, the development can be recognized as a unique and symbolic destination for the community. In the master plan for the town center there needs to be a strong public focus that energizes the overall plan. For it to be a thriving center it needs to include a broad range of uses and be a center for people to live, work, socialize and play. From our experiences and travels, "place making" for a community takes many interconnected elements to be achieved. These are some of our ideas for elements that can be studied to achieve this for Edina. It begins with a vision........ A Town Square artfully connected to The Cultural Center Town Square — A central Edina Town Square can be developed as a whole block centered on the main pedestrian boulevard to the City Hall. This generates a grand outdoor classic City Square and Park framed by midrise (6 -story) residential structures with cafes, outdoor dining and boutique shops. As one of the highest points in the overall downtown area, the Town Square will create a presence for the "center of Edina ". 2. Arts Bridge and Pedestrian Boulevard — To the east is the pedestrian boulevard across Highway 100 to the City Hall. This can be a 30 foot wide pedestrian promenade designed as an "Art Bridge" with sculptural elements connecting the CulturaUCivic Center with the Town Square. As viewed from Highway 100, the proposed "Arts Bridge" is an urban night and day marker for the Edina town center - an active link between the Town Square, City Hall and a new Cultural Center that brings together the downtown location. As the boulevard extends west to the rail line it both bridges the line and allows a vertical connection down to a streetcar line and/or bikeway to the north and south areas of the city. 3. Cultural Center — This key component can express the cultural life, history and arts in the City's downtown plan. A location at the City Hall together with an Amphitheater area for music creates a major civic anchor on the east side of downtown. The major activities on the east side expands the public realm and enhancing the scale of the downtown with civic anchors on the east and west sides. The Arts Bridge over Highway 100 may be a formidable task but achievable when it connects such major civic elements. 4. Residential with Mixed -Use — The populating of the downtown area through mid -rise density residential housing is critical to create a 2417 living downtown neighborhood center. The residential density in apartments, condos and townhouses needs to be adjacent to open public space, retail and amenity/cultural areas that support the social community. The residents want a sense of place for where they live. The public realm for the streets and entry courtyards needs to provide aesthetic views both near and far. The residential use is the engine to create a viable and vibrant community that defines the heart of a classical town center. 5. Pedestrian Street Scape Boulevards - The north /south streets connecting to the Town Square can be tree -lined with terraced housing entries to the sidewalk, landscaped boulevard and parallel parking. The apartments can have terraced, stepped back top floors to add light to the street scape. Between the blocks of housing there can be public courtyards or "woonerfs" aligned perpendicular to the boulevards as public court yards and parking. These provide aesthetic views and an amenity for residents. 6. Neighborhood Retail — On the first floor of buildings surrounding the Town Square, there will be additional retail to service the greater City and the new residential neighborhood. Currently there is quality destination retail in the area that will continue to bring people to the area. The new retail, restaurants and commercial will need to relate strongly to the residents' lifestyle, and thus will need outdoor gathering and dining areas. 7. Transit Connectors — The bus, auto and future rail transit should be integrated and accessible yet not impact the pedestrian focus of the downtown. The lower level location of the greenway rail line /bikeway allows a through -town movement for future transit. A vertical connection and bridge can be provided to the main east/west boulevard, connecting to the Town Square. Like our Uptown Greenway projects, the GrandView Greenway could be lined with three- to five -story residential buildings, have a pedestrian way on both sides and incorporate ramp connections to the rail level. It could be a visually - enhanced open view corridor for housing while screening the back of the existing retail buildings. The attached rendered plan illustrates the ideas stated above. What we have suggested reflects our individual thoughts and are submitted with that limitation. This illustrates a wide range of "public realm" ideas that are all classical principals for the development of great communities. As we presented on Tuesday, we have applied many of these principals within our projects as part of our community- building efforts. Nothing presented is beyond what can be attained with the joint efforts of us all. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to discuss your vision for the GrandView area of Edina. We look forward to partnering on this journey to create an inspiring downtown center of Edina. Best Regards, Amie Gregory Greco Development BKV Group sr' �t+(. '�. 'tt�� t `� _ .f.. acf a � � -�•-i F�;y • ti.' ' 3 �,�, �� }�S 75 . .7',i� <.y �� i { �. 14� JJ // d �+ C4: ��' + .� `4 N�,'• .. , � �;6;'Ci" d'c. � ;�, �� l,{ ✓ 1 ..I �.ya rr s3� ,1� QFHtEi T� ' -.�� ' i � �. - - 1 ,' •� } �� ��"F +•� � . C t �i �"� _ � r t Ri GEESTRI ULE w Nii ��� � Z 1 , s ? i' i ` ' t. 1 �" :� }� '. � r�y4't���•r.r,yis.,k `1 1 -.� ir�r t �£ca . -,. �i ,� �- •'°�,, + � i� �''' .w,,..r4s�� .;;,,� a.�i `.�t���; r?;t. s a` t 1*�� -.a 5 jar ns �r'St f\ > _ ,•�.- ' ' / r'4 t"!''- �kk�f+ %. 1?s'' "'+Z; e j t era t EcIS(ING � 'w, RETAIL '.� p:i i o5'x-^ E..� _ - `° .r- ,r,.� � •s�� � � r _ �C-• ti r i; �.; � � �r �� � dt .,c r� {�'c�..x� e � �`s` ,w- �$'��' � �`z�T�� -� 3 t. (.. _ i •.. 1 GR/4NDVIEW `MASTER PLAN , ti a i -� 4 i iti 09/05/14 B., K.V FpN� a R 0 �P Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Re: Demolition of 5509 Park Place Dear Dave, Lori Grotz <lori @lorigrotz.com> Friday, September 05, 201411:22 AM David Fisher Ross Bintner, Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; jonibenneitl2 @comcast.net; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com Demolition 5509 Park Place Edina Demolition Permit.pdf A worker at 5509 Park Place told Lori this morning'at about 9:30 A.M. that the house would be coming down in the next day or-two and was warning her to expect ,a lot of noise. Building Inspections told Lori they have not yet received a demolition application. Building told her that the utilities have,been disconnected and that this has been verified by a staff visit. From "Lori's understanding from Building, if an application is received today and approved, then the house can come down thenext.day, which would be tomorrow (Saturday). After you and Charlie Gerk did a site visit with Lori and me on August 29, 2014, you sent me an email that said you had put a hold on 5509,13ark Place. • Have you lifted the hold on 5509 Park Place ? . • Have the survey permit deficiencies as listed,in our August 28, 2014 letter been satisfied.? • Demolition Permit application page 2 (See Attached),has the survey requirement for "grade elevations at each corner of the existing foundation" been listed on the survey ? This would include the-outside and inside corners.of the existing foundation walls. In reviewing surveys we have obtained from other properties, in the last few days we have discovered there appears to be a pattern of not listing these on the surveys submitted for demolition by certain surveyors allowing grades to be raised without a record of what the existing grades were before demolition. If it is not on the survey then it never existed. It is a violation of the State and City building code. On the Edina Demolition Permit page 2, the applicant must Initial and sign the statement listed above. If these requirements immediately above the initials and signatures are not met, this would appear to us to:be a permit issued by the City without all requirements to obtain such permit being met. As you are aware, this would be a violation of MSBC. Please get back to us with the above, thank you for your assistance and we look forward to your response. Jim and Lori Grotz, September 5, 2014 , 5513 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 H: 952- 926 -2672 W: 952 -925 -5150 DEMOLITION / MOVING PERMIT PRINT_ :Q12 TYPE �FPlICAT701V :, _ Site Information Address Suite/Unit Number Lot Block Subdivision Tenant/Building name ❑Demolition Description ❑Move Description Proposed starting date Completion Date ❑Single Family Detached ❑3 &4 Family Residential ❑ Industrial Building ❑ Public School ❑Single Family Attached ❑5 & More Residential ❑ Hospital/ Retail Store ❑ Private School ❑Residential Garage ❑ Restaurant ❑ Church/Religious Bldg ❑ Hotel/Motel ❑Residential Addition /Porch ❑ Office/Bank/Professional ❑ Pools ❑ Other Demolition ❑Residential Deck/Shed ❑ Office/Warehouse ❑ Other Nonresidential Bldg ❑Recreation/Amusement Additional Description Valuation Applicant is Downer ❑Contractor ( moving perm# cost is $212.00) Contractor Information Company name MN Contractors License# Address City State Zip Contact person name Phone Cell Pgr Fax Email Owner Information Name Address City State Zip Phone Cell Email Moving Permit Requirements ❑ Destination of structure Move date ❑ Attach map and description of moving route ❑ Survey with grade elevations at each lot comer, grade elevations at each corner of the existing foundation, elevation at. top of e try floor. CONDITION OF PERMIT. Property must be restored within 30 days of building move — utilities abandoned at the property line with a permit, foundation demolished with a separate permit, debris removed, demolition excavation filled to match adjacent grade and seed or sad placed and maintained contractor Owner at disturbed areas. OR A permit must be issued for a new structure within 30 days of the building Initial Initial move. Demolition Permit Requirements ❑ Sewer and Water disconnected. Permit number Approved by Date _ ❑ Fire Dept burning permit If applicable. Permit Number Approved by Date ❑ Survey with grade elevations at each lot comer, grade elevations at each corner of the existing foundation, elevation at top of entry floor. ❑ Metropolitan Council Environmental Services SAC credit determination required for commercial demolition OR Owner letter acknowledging their understanding that SAC credits will be denied if credit determination not received in the same calendar year the demolition permit Is issued. CONDITION OF PERMIT: Property must be restored within 30 days of building move — utilities abandoned at the property line with a permit, foundation demolished with a separate permit, debris removed, demolition excavation filled to match adjacent grade and seed or sod placed and Contractor Owner maintained at disturbed areas. OR A permit must be issued for a new structure within 30 days of the Initial Initial building move. Applicant Signature I hereby apply for a permit and attest to the following: * All information on this application is complete and accurate. All work will comply with Conditions of Permit, Edina City Code and Minnesota State Building Code. * I understand this is an application only, not a permit. Work will not start without an approved permit. * All work will be done according to plans approved by the City of Edina when approved plans are required. * Erosion and sediment control, when applicable, will be installed before starting work. Applicant's signature Date or OwnerlApplicant Statement - To be completed only when the homeowner is the permit applicant I understand the State of Minnesota requires residential contractors, residential remodelers and residential roofers be licensed to work In the State unless they qualify for a specific exemption from the licensing requirements. By signing this statement, I certify that I am building or Improving this dwelling myself. I claim to be exempt from state licensing requirements because I am not in the business of building on speculation or for resale. I certify I have not built or improved any other residential structures In the State within the past twelve months. I also acknowledge that, because I do not have a state license, I forfeit any mechanic's lien rights to which I may otherwise have been entitled under MS 514.01. I further acknowledge I may be hiring independent contractors to perform certain aspects of the Improvements on this dwelling, and I understand some of these contractors may be required to be licensed by the State. I understand unlicensed residential contracting, residential remodeling and residential roofing activity Is a misdemeanor under Minnesota law, and I forfeit my rights to reimbursement from the Contractors Recovery Fund in the event any contractors I hire -are unlicensed. Homeowner's signature Date Homeowner's typed or printed name Contact the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Enforcement Division to determine If a contractor Is licensed or exempt or to check on contractor status. Metro: (651) 296 -2594, Outstate:1 (600) 657 - 3602, www. commerce.state.mn.ustmalnbc.htm Approvals for .office use only Building .Inspections Dept By 1' Date ". Planding Dept _ By Date Engineering Dept - B:Y.. Date Fire Dep# - Police Dept = By - ;:Date G:\ Fonns \Appllcations\appl- DEM0012309 Heather Branigin From: Lori Grotz <lori @lorigrotzcom> Sent: Friday, September 05, 20141:36 PM To: David Fisher Cc: Ross Bintner; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague@edinarealty.com Subject RE: Demolition 5509 Park Place Dear Dave, Thank you for your time and response. It is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Lori Grotz From: David Fisher fmailto:DFisher @EdlnaMN.govl Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 1:31 PM To: 'Lori Grotz' Cc: Ross Bintner; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; ,jonibennettl2Calcomcast.net; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshspragueaedinarealty.com Subject: RE: Demolition 5509 Park Place Mrs. Grotz, The City's permit record does not have an application for a demo permit yet. The city has issued a permit for the sewer & water disconnects and inspected. There is an application for a new home. Engineering Department has reviewed the info submitted and requested revisions. I still have a hold on 5509 Park Place. I want make sure Engineering and Planning approve before the permit gets issued. They could go into the house and remove things. The house itself does not have a demo permit yet. ire a,. David Fisher, Chief Building Official 952- 826 -04501 Fax 952- 826 -0389 ; v DFsherda-EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov • •�L :„ ; ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Tell us how we're doinal Take our customer satisfaction survey. From: Lori Grotz Lmailto:lorialorigrotz.coml Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:22 AM To: David Fisher Cc: Ross Bintner; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; jonibennett12Cfcomcast.net; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); ioshsprague(&edinarealty.com Subject: Demolition 5509 Park Place Re: Demolition of 5509 Park Place Dear Dave, A worker at 5509 Park Place told Lori this morning at about 9:30 A.M. that the house would be coming down in the next day or two and was warning her to expect a lot of noise. Building Inspections told Lori they have not yet received a demolition application. Building told her that the utilities have been disconnected. and that this has been verified by a staff visit. From Lori's understanding from Building, if an application is received today and approved, then the house can come down the next day, which would be tomorrow (Saturday). After you and Charlie Gerk did a site visit with Lori and me orfAugust 29, 2014, you sent me an email that said you had put a hold on 5509 Park Place. • Have you lifted the hold on 5509 Park Place ? • Have the survey permit deficiencies as listed in our August 28, 2014 letter been satisfied ? • Demolition Permit application page 2 (See Attached),has the survey requirement for "grade elevations at each corner of the existing foundation" been listed on the survey. ? This would - include the outside and inside corners of the existing foundation walls. In reviewing surveys we have obtained from'o Per properties, in,the last few. days we have discovered there appears to be'�a pattern of not listing these on the survey's submitted_for'demolition by certain surveyors allowing grades to be raised without a record of what the existing grades were before;demolition. If it is not on.the survey then it never existed. It is a violation of the State and City building code. On the Edina Demolition Permit page 2, the applicant must initial and`sign the statement listed above. If these requirements immediately above the initials and signatures are not met, this would appear to us to be a permit issued by the City without all requirements to obtain such permit bein&met. =,As you are aware, this would be a violation of MSBC. Please get back to us with the above, thank you for your assistance and we look forward to your response. Jim and Lori Grotz, September 5, 2014 5513 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 H: 952- 926 -2672 W: 952 - 925 -5150 Heather Braniain From: Jackie Sullivan <sullivan6832 @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 3:34 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcastnet; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject THANK YOU for saying "YES" to 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson: Thank you for saying YES Tuesday,,night, agreeing to amend.the city's comprehensive plan and rezone a property to allow 66 West to move forward. Special thanks to each of you for your leadership and countless hours spent reading letters and emaft, talking with interested parties, an, d developing a firm grasp of the many issues and differing viewpoints involved. I want to also note my appreciation for how graciously you listened to the public comments during the meeting and how thoughtfully you then reflected on what you had heard as you made your own comments prior to the vote. What a powerful message that the vote was unanimous! With your decision, Edina takes a significant step forward to being'an inclusive community in which everyone can thrive. Gratefully, Jackie Sullivan 6832 Gleason Road, Edina 1 September 6, 2014 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota, 55424 Mr. Hovland I am writing regarding the use of the Fred Richards golf course. I appreciate you have had open dialogue regarding its future use. Unfortunately, I couldn't be at one meeting 'I saw scheduled. Therefore, I am writing to let my preference be known. I have along history in Edina. I lived in Edina Morningside.Area from 1966 -1984. I was - -the closing principal at Morningside and Cahill School. Next, I have'lived :on,Cahill Road in two diifferent complexes. I was on the committee who helped plan the Edina Senior Center. We traveled to many communities to see other models. I still remain active at the' Edina -Senior Center. Just before refiring; I took up painting. My first classes, were at the Edina Art Center. I would look for a class offered on Saturday. That is what has lead to my,passion. t primarily paint in watercolor. I find that the Edina Art Center classes no longer meet my needs. I use to travel to Minnetonka Art Center, now I go to the Phipps Museum in Hudson, Wisconsin. Yes, I drive. to Hudson every Thursday to paint with other painters. We have become known as the TMP's (the Thursday Morning Painters.) The only requirement for those who come is that they become a member of the Museum. The painting room is the largest I know of in the metropolitan area. We are welcomed at the Phipps and recently were given a chance to put up our own art show for six weeks. In the winter, I go to Florida, and belong to two art centers. One is a small one room beach house which the members manage, the other a huge complex like a campus. In telling you this, I have learned what makes a good art center. I think Edina needs to rethink the present art center. I was on the Board of the art center in Northfield at one time. The building was donated for an art center like Edina. A great deal of money was spent over the years to make it useable. It probably still is not what they would like it to be. They like Edina have no room to grow and serve all the arts. Therefore, I would like you to put a new art center on the list of uses for the Fred Richards golf course. It gives Edina an opportunity.to be a multi - purpose art center similar to the building in Hudson.. Even though Hudson has a great facility, they are raising capital funds to make it better. The Hudson facility includes theater, dance studio, pottery, art, galleries, gift shop, office space, meeting room and more. It would be worth.your while to look at the facility which is four stories. Here is an opportunity for Edina to really show they care about the arts. You only have one opportunity to use this space wisely. Over other suggestions, this would be used for all ages all year around with plenty of parking. Take your time in making this decision. I would like to be notified if you are having another meeting about the usage of the golf course. I don't always get an Edina Sun newspaper. If you would like to talk further with me, please know I would be happy to meet with you. Sincerely, /1Z4��,- Mary Hertogs CC: John Keprios Heather, Branigin From: Jackie Prince <j,m.prince @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, September 08,2014 12:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you! Dear Mayor Hovland, I was so proud to be an Edinan last Monday night. Thank you for your vote to approve 66 West youth housing. I know it was a difficult decision, but I think over the years we as a city will be very glad that type of supportive youth housing is built therein the TCF building. Sincerely, Jackie Prince Heather Branigin From: Nancy and Peter Killilea <pkandnb @comcast.net> Sent Monday, September 08, 201412:27 PM To: Chad Millner. Cc: joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, swensonannl @gmaii.com ;Edina Mail; Ross Bintner Subject: Input on Acres DuBois Alternative Development Plan Attachments: Acres Dubois Plan[l].docx Chad, Please find our position following last Thursday's community meeting attached. Regards, Pete and Nancy Killilea 0 1 4236 Lynn Ave Edina, MN 55416 September 7, 2014 Chad Milner Engineering Director, City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 Chad, We appreciate you and Ross taking the time to explain the approved and alternative plans for Acres DuBois. As you experienced at the meeting, there is a lot of emotion regarding the project. The approved plan has issues including the dramatic loss of mature trees. The alternative plan as presented at the meeting has tangible benefits for immediate neighbors, the broader Morningside community and the city relative to the approved plan. The benefits of the alternative plan include: • Improvement to Edina's storm water management plan at minimal cost to the city. — The flooding issues in the Weber Park area have been documented and the alternative plan will help to mitigate the problem. We understand that other than this opportunity, the city has no plans to address the problem. If the city were to take action and bear the full burden of the cost, it would be significantly more expensive than the proposed alternative in which City Homes, the developer of Acres DuBois, is responsible for the majority of the costs. It would be irresponsible for the city to forego such an opportunity. • Preservation of significantly more mature trees in the development area. After having spent many hours in Planning Commission and City Council meetings regarding this development, we were surprised and disappointed to learn recently that the approved plan required the preservation of only ten trees throughout the 3+ acre area. The initial presentation to the Planning Commission indicated more than 90 trees would be saved and the latest plan discussed in one of the public forums included more than 80 trees to be protected. In addition, the inclusion of underwater storage tanks and the highly invasive nature of installing these were not discussed in these forums. The city has a responsibility to ensure this area is developed in a manner consistent with the area and protecting only 10 trees in an area this size is neglectful of this duty. • Transformation of Open Lot 6 to more useable space. The topography of this space and, until recently the vegetation, significantly limits the use of this area. A flat, landscaped area will be more functional and serve the area better than the current space. Another factor contributing to the emotions related to this issue is the management of Open Lot 6 during the construction of 4234 Lynn (the house immediately to the south of the lot). The misuse of the space and poor communication between'the city and residents during that project created a lack of trust which has carried over to the Acres. DuBois project and discussions regarding the alternative plan. Unfortunately, the initial communication.regarding the alternative plan did not help this situation. Two key concerns with the alternative plan were voiced during the meeting. However, both are based more on emotion than the facts that were presented. 1. Residents in immediate proximity to open lot 6 were concerned that the installation of underground water storage tanks and changes to'the topography of the lot would increase the flood risk to their homes. The engineering experts (yourself included) indicated the project would not change the flood risk to these homes based on the construction plan and relative heights of the water table in the lot and their homes. If that is true, the unfounded fears of a small group should not derail the opportunity to improve the plan and benefit the broader neighborhood and city. 2. Another concern was that installing water storage tanks on the lot precludes future action by the city which may enable even greater improvement to the storm water management plan. The adage of a bird in hand is worth two in the bush is apt relative to this concern. Without any plans for such action in the city's long range plan and given funding priorities across the city this possibility is remote at best. Despite the high emotions regarding this development, we should be making fact based decisions. We do not contend the alternative proposal a perfect plan. However, based on the information presented at the meeting, it is clearly superior to the approved plan. Regards, Peter and Nancy Killilea Cc: Edina City Council Members, Ross Bintner, City of Edina Environmental Engineer Heather Braniain From: Kay Bochert <kbochert@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, September 08, 20141:36 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Thank you for voting to include 66 West in our city. Kay Bochert 1 Heather Branigin From: Timothy.J. Rudnicki <RudnickiLaw @q.com> Sent: Monday, September 08, 20141:40 PM . To: Scott H: Neal Cc: Chad Millner,' James Hovland; Edina Mail; Joni Bennett; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Stacie Christensen Subject: Re: City Homes - Acres DuBois Mr. Neal I appreciate your.reply; however, the City of Edina remains unresponsive to/ related information requests as presented in the email message dated August '20,2014, and at a meeting convened by the developer on Thursday, September 4, 2014, ` at Weber Park. Consequently, Ms. Stacie Christensen, from the Minnesota Department of Administration, Information Policy Analysis Division, has been engaged in this matter and copied on this message. Although the City of Edina has already approved the development project (Plan A), which will purportedly contain stormwater on the private property of the development and thereby use infiltration through many layers of soil so as to treat the runoff, now the developer seeks approval to use public property (open space at the bottom of the hill at Littel and Lynn Avenue) for stormwater retention (Plan B). The City Engineer presented the case for the developer and opined, on the merits of Plan B. Plan B has the potential to adversely impact home values and homes along Lynn Avenue, from Littel Street to 42nd Street and to Weber Park. Dozens of residents attended the meeting and, but .for a couple of individuals, presented a broad range of questions seeking information and answers to understand the full implications of Plan B. Despite repeated requests for information, especially since the City Engineer already formed various opinions, the City failed to produce relevant and meaningful documents and information as requested. 1. Please provide, via email, the complete audio recording, or transcript, of the meeting that was held on September 4, in the Weber Park Building. 2. Please provide copies (PDF files) of all plans, exhibits and other graphs and charts and any other written materials that have been used by the City Engineer to form an opinion about "Plan B ". Respectfully submitted, Tim Rudnicki 952.915.1505 On 8/21/201411:39 AM, Scott H. Neal wrote: Good Morning Tim — In response to your questions, I offer you the following: 1. Please provide me, via email, with the complete audio recording, or transcript, of the meeting that was held on August 14 in the Edina Public Works Building. SHN >>> I did not attend the August 14 meeting, but I'm sure there was no audio recording, which also means there can be no transcript. 2. Please clarify for me, was the meeting conducted by the City of Edina or City Homes? SHN >>> The meeting was conducted at a municipal facility conducted jointly by the City of Edina and City Homes. 3. Was the letter regarding the meeting on August 14 drafted by the City of Edina or the developer, City Homes? SHN >>> It Is my understanding the letter was drafted by City Homes, but reviewed by City staff. 4. Please provide me with copies (PDF files) of all plans, exhibits and other graphs and charts and any other written materials that were used or presented at the meeting at issue.on August 14. SHN >>> I have copied City Engineer Chad Millner on this email. Chad was directly involved in this matter. He can also provide you with the documentation that you have requested. 2 Scott Scott H. Neal, City Manager ? 952-826-04011 Fax 952 -826 -0380 snealOEdinaMN.Qov I www.EdinaMN.aov 3. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Read � bloa or follow me on Twitter. From: Timothy I Rudnicki rmailto:RudnickiLaw @ q.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:20 AM To: Scott H. Neal Subject: City Homes - Acres DuBois Hello Scott! It seems there was some meeting held on Aug. 14 regarding Acres DuBois and a proposed change in development plan presented by City Homes. I opted to prep for and go to my EEC meeting rather than the Acres DuBois meeting since a letter with the name City Homes at the bottom states "There are no changes proposed..." Yet, after speaking with folks, I find the meeting might have included some proposed changes. Can you help me fill in the blanks? 1. Please provide me, via email, with the complete audio recording, or transcript, of the meeting that was held on August 14 in the Edina Public Works Building. 2. Please clarify for me, was the meeting conducted by the City of Edina or City Homes? 3. Was the letter regarding the meeting on August 14 drafted by the City of Edina or the developer, City Homes? 4. Please provide me with copies (PDF files) of all plans, exhibits and other graphs and charts and any other written materials that were used or presented at the meeting at issue on August 14. Thank you. Tim Rudnicki 952- 915 -1505 3 Heather Branigin From: Todd Olson" <todd @metrocitiesmn.org> Sent Monday,, September 08, 2014`2 :03 PM To: Todd Olson Subject RE: 2014 Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Members Thank you all for a great committee this year. Below is the new water policy we passed today. Please review and let me know if you feel I didn't capture your intent in the new changes. Thanks again and we hope to see you at the Policy Adoption meeting on November 13in 2 -0 WATER SUPPLY —(NEW POLIO Municipal water suppliers are charged with meeting the water supply needs of their communities and do so with safe, reliable and cost effective systems that are sustainable both for established cities and for all future growth. Regulation of water is complex and compartmentalized. Various agencies permit its use, plan for its availability, regulate stormwater, treat wastewater and protect the safes of water. To ensure that water supply remains adequate and sustainable across the region, we must understand how much water can be sustainably drawn from the apuifers and what effect increases in re -use, conservation and recharge can have on the sustainability and availability of both groundwater and .surface water. Many of these strategies cross agocy jurisdictions and will require improved coordination and cooperation. Municipal water suppliers have made significant infrastructure investments in their systems based on calculated water availability and DNR permits. Proposals to reduce the reliance on groundwater by switching municipal water systems from groundwater to surface water supplies will come with significant costs that could place excessive burdens on local resources. of also take into account all water users, including municipal water suppliers, industry, private wells, agriculture, and contamination containment. The metropolitan region must consider the effects of groundwater use beyond the borders of the metropolitan area on the region's groundwater availability and the cost of treating contaminants in surface water that comes into the metropolitan area for use. streamlining and consolidating permit approval processes and the availability of statewide resources to plan for and ensure the future sustainability of water supply in the metropolitan area. Metro Cities also encourages the Met Council to find ways to re-use wastewater and to develop other strategies as a means to improve conservation. Metro Cities supports the availability of state funds for costs associated with converting water supply from groundwater to surface water, and funds to encourage And bromote water conservation as a strategy to improve water sustainabdity and to improve and nrotectwater quality. I 2 Heather Branigin From: USCM/Tom Cochran < actionalert= usmayors .org @mail200.ati2l.rsgsv.net> on.behalf of USCM/Tom Cochran <actionalert @usmayors.org> Sent Monday, September 08, 2014 5:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Mayoral Sign -On Letter to Congress calling for Reauthorization of Ex -Im Bank Before Expiration on 9/30 TO: The Mayor THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 MT STU , h'URTIMST WASMNGTt]1r,1).C,10i006 TELEPHONE (N.11:93 -i�30 FAX 1201) 1tl .1.1; ;91 URL xtiv�s.rumnyoc rtrrS FROM: Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director Today, we sent a letter to Congressional Leaders signed by USCM Leadership Mayors, calling on Congress to reauthorize the Export-Import (Ex -1m) Bank of the United States before its charter expires on September 30, 2014. The letter, with all, mayoral signatories to date, is available for download and review here. Without support from Ex -Im, businesses in cities nationwide will face little or no financing alternatives, putting U.S, jobs in jeopardy. Click here to add your name to this very important letter. We plan to resend it to the Hill to demonstrate the broad base of support for the Ex -1m bank among the mayors from cities both large and small, suburban and urban. During the 82nd USCM Annual Meeting in Dallas this past June where nearly 300 mayors convened, we unanimously adopted a resolution in support for Ex -Im Bank's Reauthorization. If you have any questions, please contact L.ina Garcia at: 1 arciana,usma o� rs_org or (202) 341 -6113 or Dave Gatton at: dgatton@_usmgyors.org rs_org or (202) 861 -6712. 1 ,,jl Heather Branigin From: Kathy <oconnellgang @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, September 08, 201410:09 PM To: - Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: Planning commission To the Mayor and the city council, Would you also respond to my questions listed below? Particularly , is there a comprehensive plan the city is following? It appears as if the decisions are made independently of each other, are not taking into consideration of how this is changing the dynamics of the city. Begin forwarded message: From: Kathy <oconnellgang@comcast.net> Date: September 8, 2014 at 9:56:52 PM CDT To: "ctegUe@,EdinaMN.gov" <cteague@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Planning commission Mr. Teague,. Please pass this along to the planning commission, and answer any of the questions you are able to answer. A special insert in the recent Sun Current titled "Edina: Edition" showcased a map of the most recent commercial development in Edina. Quite the graphic, showing almost exclusively all the development will or is taking place in the southeast section of town. Out of curiosity, I pulled up the current school district boundaries. From the two maps, it became clear to me that 860 new housing units are going into the Cornelia school section of the district. This raises questions from me that I would expect the school board is currently addressing. So here I go. 1) Has the district been made aware of this significant population that will be impacting the school population? 2) Has the city planning commission been working with the school district? 3) What role has the district been playing in the planning of the new development? 4) One of the developments at France and, 72nd is still under proposal, adding 200 housing units. Is the district currently engaging in planning and discussions on this property? 5) Does the planning commission have a student population projection based on the type of housing that is being added to the district? And are they working with the district to address the potential impact? 6) Has there been a study of the traffic impacts of 860 new housing units in such a small geographic area? 7) Does the planning commission have a strategic plan on increasing the housing in such a high density way, and if so, is there a public procedure to advance such a- plan! Please respond with answers. Sincerely, Tom O'Connell - Heather Branigin From: Phil Mero <phil.mero @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 08, 201411:55 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: Edina Mail; Monica Mero Subject 4419 Grimes Avenue Attachments: IMAG1761 jpg Hello Joni- Phil Mero here, I live at 4501 Grimes Avenue, REFINED recently purchased the house (lot) 1 house to the north. ' They took the house down today, and are preparing to raze essentially. the entire yard. Trust me, the house had to go, BUT the yard does should not be completely cleared. fain reaching out because in 2010 our want for a variance was almost denied due to the former owner and her. concern for 1 of the pine trees. The council at the time was very concerned about preserving our URBAN Canopy; so much so that it came down to a 3 -2 vote thankfully in our favor. Since that time, we have come very attached to the amazing trees that are on that lot. This is one of the most mature lots in the area home to 3 80+ year old; and 50+ foot tall pine trees. One white.pine in particular is one of the most amazing trees you will ever see. (photo, attached) This tree belongs "along the shores of Lake Vermillion, and now it is going to find it's fate at the hands of a'builder so that the new home owners can put in a pool. The fact that a historic neighborhood like Morningside can fall victim to a plethora of'carpetbaggee builders (I know Porter is from Edina, West Edina) and quickly become 'Edina Praire' is a travesty. The house next to 4419 is the'Turret House', built just prior to our addition in 2010. The family who built the house lived in it for less than 2 years. Since moving in 2011, the house has been a habitual rental, having been on and off the market for over 2 years. This house WILL NOT SELL. Overnight, almost 100 years of rich, mature community is being blitzkrieged at such an enormous cost to the rich landscape. Unfortunately it is happening on your watch. Not a legacy I would want to uphold. As longtime Edina residents, how can YOU help US preserve what makes this part of Edina s000 special. I do appreciate your quick response to this sincere plea for assistance. Phil and Monica Mero 4501 Grimes Avenue 8 year residents (Monica grew up in Country Club) Phil Mero 612.963.0852 i Heather Braniain From: League of Minnesota Cities < members= lmc.org @mail46.at131.mcdlv.net> on behalf of League of Minnesota Cities <members @lmc.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 201410:44 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Essay Contest Now Open for Students in Your City! Give the'Kids in Your City a Voice! How would your city be different if elementary school students were the leaders? Now's your chance to find out! The League of Minnesota Cities is hosting a "Mayor for a Day" essay contest for 4th, 5th, and 6th graders. Please help us spread the word to students through your local schools, teachers, libraries, councilmembers, media, and parents! The contest asks students to focus on one city service —be it fire, parks and rec, or police —and reflect on how they would improve it for your community. We will choose three winners who will be awarded $100 -and have their essays published in Minnesota Cities magazine. 1 Access the entry form on LMC's website at www.Imc.org /mayorforaday. Please share this link with others —and we also hope you will consider publishing it on your city's website and /or including it in the next issue of your city newsletter. Entries must be handwritten and postmarked no'later than October 15, 2014. Questions? Contact: Don Reeder Assistant Communications Director League of Minnesota Cities dreeder@lmc.org (651) 215 -4031 Follow on Twitter Friend on Facebook Forward to Friend League of Minnesota Citles 145 University Ave W Saint Paul, MN 55103 -2044 Add us to your address book As part of your membership In the League of Minnesota Cities, you will receive occasional emails from us about our events, - products, and services; you can opt out of these emalls by clicking the unsubscribe link below. unsubscribe from this list 2 J Heather Branigin From: mjoas @comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 20141:31 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett12 @comcastnet; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl@gmail.com Cc: Joas, Margaret Subject: Sewer Backup June 19 Dear Mayor Hovland and Honorable Council Members, Bill and I send you a packet of information and photos regarding our house and the sewer back up in our home on June 19. It has been over three weeks since we sent you the packet of information and we have heard from no one regarding this matter. I repeat, no one has contacted us regarding our financial situation of having to pay out $7,500 for our insurance deductible. The lack of initiative on a response back to us from you, Edina city leaders or staff, is not acceptable. Mayor Hovland, please call us at 952 -935 -1081 as we would like to set me a meeting with you to discuss our situation. Thank you, Margaret and Bill Joas 6409 Biscayne Boulevard Edina, MN 55436 1 Heather Branigin From: USCM/Tom Cochran < actionalert= usm6yors .org @mai1140.atil2l.mcsv.net> on behalf of USCM/Tom Cochran <actionalert @usmayors.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Register Now: Community Policing and Ports Meetings in Little Rock, October 8 =10 — President Clinton Confirmed TO: I The Mayor THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620M STRUT NORTI-[S ST WASHINGTON, D.C,10006 TEL1[PH4?4,.1E I.O:};93 -J : 0 FAX 62021 193. 2352 LIRL wwwulmoyanawa: FROM: Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director I wi7te to invite -you to j oin us in Little Rock October 8 - 10 for two important Conference of Mayors meetings. On October 8 - 9 we will hold a meeting on community policing at the William J. Clinton Presidential Center. On October 9 - 10 the Conference's Task Force on Ports and Exports will meet. Little Rock Mayor Mark Stodola will be our host for both. Space is limited, so please register for the meeting and make your hotel reservations as soon as possible. Registration and hotel information for both meetings are available on line at http: / /usm4yors.or_/Litt]eRock2014. A block of hotel rooms has been reserved at the Capital Hotel. Rooms must be confirmed with the Hotel by Friday, September 12. Please direct questions regarding registration and hotel, to the Conference's Conventions Manager, Carol Edwards, at cedwards a,usma oy rs.org or (202) 861 -6747. October 8 - 9: Making Cities Safe Through Community Policing: A Meeting of Mayors and Police Chiefs at the William J. Clinton Presidential Center The meeting will commemorate the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the COPS Program and Office, examine the current state of community policing in cities, and provide information on promising practices which you can employ today and in the future to make your city safer. This meeting will also provide us a timely opportunity to discuss lessons learned from the tragedy that 1 occurred in Ferguson and its aftermath. Mayors are encouraged to bring their police chiefs to the meeting. The meeting will be a mix of presentations by mayors and police chiefs about exemplary efforts to address key problems and addresses by prominent officials. President Clinton is confirmed to address the gathering on Wednesday m6rning. We also expect that one of the top officials at the Justice Department will be present, along with COPS Office Director Ron Davis. The meeting will begin at 8:00am on Wednesday, October 8 and conclude at 11:00am on Thursday, October 9. Questions on this meeting should be directed to the Conference's Public Safety Director Laura DeKoven Waxman at lwaxman@usma rlors org or L202)_489 -7534. October 9 - 10: Ports and Exports Task Force Meeting Beginning immediately following the COPS meeting on Thursday, October 9, the U.S. Conference of Mayors Task Force on Ports and Exports, chaired by Jacksonville Mayor Alvin Brown, will hold a meeting to highlight how the recently passed Water Resources Reform Development Act will affect funding of sea and inland port development, and to announce major initiatives and new partnerships to expand exports in cities and their metro regions. The meeting will focus particularly on the unique role inland ports play in the nation's transportation system. Our host will be Task Force Vice -Chair Little Rock Mayor Mark Stodola. The meeting will take place at the Capital Hotel, beginning with a luncheon on October 9 and concluding with a luncheon on October 10. Questions on this meeting should be directed to Dave Gatton at d ag tton@Ulsmayors.org or (202) 861 -6712. FA United States Conference of Mayors 16201 St., N.W. 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Adci us to ov ur address book unsubscribe from this list I update subscri to ion rep feren2t: u�dnte yoar contact infonnation 2 Heather Branigin From: Jane Lonnquist <jlonnquist @earthlink.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 8:30 AM To: Joyce Repya Cc: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject Following up from HPB meeting Good morning, Joyce, I want to thank and congratulate you and the board for your efficient and intelligent handling of the three COAs for Country Club last night. Will you please pass this note along to the HPB volunteers, including the two great student representatives? I am copying the mayor and city council to let them know that the neighborhood is pleased that the new guidelines we established together in 2008 to protect the Historic Country Club District are working. First, an observation: The guidance that I heard quoted from Robert Vogel on 4511 Browndale sets up a very different -- and much higher -- standard for protection than the POT specifies. If 4511 Browndale had been a Tudor style built in 1942 would the conversation have gone differently? Under Vogel's guidance it may well have. Under the POT it shouldn't. I am glad that you as staff helped the board follow the guidelines. I suspect you will need to do so again in the future if Mr. Vogel's pontifications wander away from the rules. Second, a question: The COA Requirements say that applications are due three weeks ahead of the HPB meeting. I learned after the meeting that the adjacent neighbors received notice of the application last Wednesday, less than a week before the meeting. The Requirements and Process document says that the neighboring property owners will be notified of the COA. Are there any stated deadlines for when this must happen? Thank you, Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Avenue 952 - 926 -3725 September 8, 2014 To Whom It May Concern: I noticed orange markings,comingacEgss,Fred Richards golf course to the cul de sec on Kellogg Avenue. The markings, from Kellogg,: go sb'uA, ;a16n -g. "the west side of.the practice putting green and then south again causing the regional trail to, go from east:to north directly into the Kellogg cul de sec. I called Three givers Park District and spoke to Jason regarding the Nine Mile Creek Trail. I was then informed that it.was Edina who had suggested they look at this new path for the trail. According to this representative, it was not the Three Rivers Park District's original proposal:for the path of the trail. All routes until this time had gone east on 77°', and then went north along Parklawn. One route showed it going across the bridge that now goes to the ninth hole tee -off. Apparently now Edina has proposed the trail travel through what is now Fred Richards golf course and join the trail at the Kellogg cul de sac with Edina's trail going east to Parklawn. I am concerned that this will cause more traffic on Kellogg and parking of cars on Kellogg because this.thentreates a terminal point for access to the,trail. Access to the north side of the park will be the cul de sac on Kellogg. This is inevitable. But, I would prefer that we not design in additional features that draw any more activity, parking, etc., to the north side of the park adjacent to our single family homes. All designs shown to date showed the trail on the south side and far east portions of the new park. Buffering the existing Edina trail will be exceedingly difficult not only in the single - family home neighborhood of Kellogg, but also near - impossible where it is within 5 feet of the property line of the apartment at 4380 Parklawn and approximately 50 feet from the apartment's bedroom windows on that side. The route of the trail over the existing 9"' hole bridge, and then to Parklawn, makes a lot more sense from a buffering point of view. This new route was not suggested nor presented in any of the public meetings. The other trail routes proposed by Three Rivers were all shown, and I did not hear any negative comments regarding those routes. Why would you now deviate to yet another potentially negative proposal? Sincerely, Art Lowell 7505 Kellogg Avenue S. Edina, MN 55435 Heather Braniain From: jjaaa5 @aol.com Sent Wednesday, September_ 10, 201411:44�AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Fwd: Edina Mayor Hovland, I sent the attached email to Aft Neal. In hindsight I feel that I should have sent it to your The step that Edina is considering by creating a Conflict of Interest policy could be an example to others on how to avoid political battles that damage the image, of some cities. I would, however, encourage you to consider a broader ethics package (please see below) to truly protect the city. If Common Cause Minnesota can assist you in this effort, .please let us know. Jerry Franck, Chair Common Cause Minnesota - -- Original Message— From: jjaaa5 <jiaaa5(a)_aol.com> To: sneal <sneal0_)EdinaMN.4ov> Sent: Sat, Aug 30, 2014 11:19 am Subject: Edina, Mr Neal, I am pleased to see that the city of Edina is considering a Conflict of Interest policy. To do so is to be proactive and help prevent.battles that can tarnish a city's image. I would like to; take is opportunity to request you consider. a couple of,other steps that can.help prevent problems: Nepotism The county of Winona has an excellent nepotism policy example. http: / /www.co.winona.mn.us/ sites/ winonacgMpV.new.rschooltod".com /files/ /po1104 - nepotism.pdf Revolving Door Require a two year cooling off period before people leaving the City can become a lobbyist and use their influence to achieve an objective that may or may not °be the ideal result for the city. Gift prohibition Strong restrictions on accepting gifts. If we can help, please let us know. Jerry Franck Chair, Common Cause Minnesota i Policy: Nepotism Policy Section: 1.04 Winona County Personnel Page: 1 of 1 Policies and Procedures Date Approved by the County Board: 10/26/10 Policy Winona County is committed to a policy of employment and advancement based on qualifications and merit and does not discriminate in favor of or in opposition to the employment of relatives. Due to potential for perceived or actual conflicts, such as favoritism or personal conflicts from outside the work environment which can be carried into the daily working 'relationships, the following restrictions apply to the hiring or employing of relatives: Relatives of persons currently employed may be hired only if they will not. be working directly for or supervising a relative or will not occupy a position in the same line of authority where employees can initiate or participate in decisions involving a direct benefit to the relative. Such decisions include but are not limited to hiring, retention, transfer, promotion, wages, and leave requests. This policy applies to all current and potential employees. Family member is defined as one of the following: relationships by blood — parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, first cousin; and relationships by marriage — husband, wife (as defined by the state law), stepparent, stepchild, brother -in -law, sister -in -law, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, daughter -in -law, half - brother, half - sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, spouse/partner of any of the above and cohabitating couples/significant others. Prior to the employment offer the immediate supervisor must complete a signed statement certifying that he/she is not hiring a relative. Failure to submit the signed statement will result in the delay of the job, offer until the statement is submitted. The hiring supervisor is responsible for ensuring policy compliance. Department heads are responsible for monitoring changes in employee reporting relations after initial hire to ensure compliance with this policy. Employees are responsible for reporting any changes immediately to their supervisor. If any employee, after employment, enters into one of the above relationships, one individual must seek a transfer or a change in the reporting relationship. Such changes must be approved by the Personnel Director. If a decision cannot be made among the.affected employees .within 14 days, reassignment will be made upon direction of the department head and the Personnel Director. No exception to this policy will be made without the written'consent of the County Administrator. Heather Branigin From: Eugene Persha <epersha @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, September,10, 2014 9:50 PM To: Edina Mail ' Subject; Grandview's Developers' Initial Proposals To: Members of City Council, City Manager, Planning Dept., and Economic Development Dept. From: Gene Persha Date: September 10, 2014 r Topic: Grandview Development After watching, participating in the Grandview I. Community Advisory Team, and looking at many depictions and ideas for redeveloping the Grandview site for over five years, I have some observations and recommendations. 1) The "Final Four'.developers, it seemed to me, did not read either Grandview I's report closely, or did not have any idea of what the "desired end result" was to be, or just not really cognizant of the difficulties for development as delineated by the Grandview II team. 2) Very little reference, specific reference, was made to the work of Grandview I and II. 3) If one looks at all four presentations by the "Final Four', it is apparent the civic, the public purpose of this site, has been lost. 4) To me, there was a total lack of creativity for developing this site. Nothing stood out. 5) The central focus, as presented by the "Final Four", was highds' a apartment buildings towering over everything else, even the postage stamp size green space /public plaza. 6) The.terrain of the land was really not taken into account or used in an effective way, especially at the bottom of the hill on Eden Avenue.Perhaps, this area could have.a,higher structure because of the topography. I do not think anyone in our Grandview I group envisaged the largeness of possible apartment buildings as this, and even in the location depicted. 7) Once again, clear sight lines, blockages of light, shadowing, over densifying a small area, just overwhelms this small space. . 8) Not one developer gave a large chunk of land to either a public building, public square, or even a park and ride facility which was never really depicted in any form. 9) The emphasis by every developer was to squeeze as much revenue out of the Grandview site on their unwarranted assumption of their total ownership and control. The proposals were none other than proposals to make money, and not a plan to fit the city's needs, yet alone expectations for this land. 10) Note: the Community/Public Building appears as an "add on" really with no connection by shape and form to the proposed apartment buildings, the chief structures here. 11) Where are the amenities such as walk paths, a bicycle corridor, flower gardens, tree preserves, and some break up of the concrete structural look? The vlsitors.need and outdoor utilitarian use also. It is a city-wide use area! 12) The bus garage is always mentioned(that elusive future desirable), but there never is even a suggestion how to deal with it? I will give one: Use city money and financing, with TIF funds to help get the school district get a new facility in the limited areas it might go within the city. 1 13) Covering the railroad tracks or building over them just will not happen without a tremendous financial encumbrance. The railroads'tiave pre- eminent rights historically as few privateentities have today. A better_suggestion would be to make amore functional bridge over the tracks by Davanni's and across from the Edina Liquor Store. Has any one of our developers asked the railroad to help partner a new crossing over the tracks? 14) Notice, there were no step downs or step ups in the building. heights, Maybe the contour of the' land might lend itself to some of this type of design. 15) There was any over emphasis on apartment buildings at the expense of everything else. 16) There was no mention of trying to buy or partner with the.owner of the "building on stilts" at the base of Eden Avenue. What would the owner get in return? Maybe some city help to make this a more comprehensive and wholistic designed area? 17) Did you notice that one of the developers proposed an outdoor swimming pool? Did this group even consider a possible joint use in a community center? Anyway, there is no green space given instead of the pool area. Everything is tailored to building tenants. 1 8) What about a reconfiguration of the roadways and access roads that are adjacent to Hyw. 100? According to Grandview I, that definitely had possibilities. 19) Can't we easily destroy an area with over density and building size and decreased livability and community use when we pack it all in Grandview? 20) Developers like to use the city's small projected green space here, or better yet, Our Lady of Grace's green space for their front yard, but they minimize their contribution to this, and surely for the public realm. Their obligations and needs are met by others. 21) I think we need some competition for "best design" for this area rather than turn this into one commercial venture where that is the visible emphasis. Every developer should submit(an actual sketch plan) in three contexts: A) bigger development -112 of the area for a building /s B) major public /community building C) one half green space.area which could even include a utilitarian green roof over a park and ride or parking ramp naturalized. 22) After three different plans with different emphases are submitted, they could be rated by meeting the "desired future objectives." If you have seen an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS), and I am not suggesting one, but they have alternatives with perceived attributes and deficiencies listed. Out of this comes a "preferred alternative:" I have always liked the format of this since things are spelled out. It also serves as a good comparison document. They can be scored, ranked, or rated for appropriateness for the area. 23) We need some innovative ventures put forward for Grandview. We have limits, but we do have some real possibilities for something different How can we do something different because of the location? 24) We must never forget what I call "the carrying capacity" for this small parcel of land. There has to be a definable limit how much can be put into the Grandview site. 25) None of the developers talked about costs. Interesting! We need cost estimates for various components of things that could be put in at Grandview. We need to understand reality here, and see what is possible with the funds made available in a whole variety of ways. 26) We are not subsidizing a developer. we are subsidizing our city's interests. 27)Lastly, I suggest new guidelines modeled after the Grandview l design and the Grandview II 'Wants and objections ". This would be coupled with input from the Planning Commission, City Council, City Staff, and most importantly the general public. Lay out the best designs in'the three categories, critique them, and then let anyone do their own sketch plan or modification of what they see keeping in mind the real financial constraints of what things cost. 28) We cannot throw this piece of property up for grabs so a developer first and foremost wants to make the maximum amount tailored toward their interests. The developer plans need to fit into prescribed guidelines in the fashion as I suggested. There always must be that "Visible Public Purpose." That should be Guideline #11 Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners September 8, 2014 i nreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Dear Mr. James Hovland: Penny Steele Greetings, my name is Dann McCullough. I am the Regional Trail Manager at Three District 1 9 Y 9 9 9 Rivers Park District and will be the new point of contact for Winter Use Permit information. I want to highlight some changes we are implementing to the Winter Use permitting process: Jennifer De]ournett -As of this ear, we are no longer requiring City Council action for issuance of a District 2 Y 9 q 9 tY Winter Use Permit. Cities can decide what level of approval is needed. - Current permits that are issued will be for the 2014 -2015 season. Beginning in Daniel Freeman, 2015 -2016 we are planning to issue permits on a 3 year cycle. Vice Chair District 3 These changes should significantly streamline the application process for both parties. John Gunyou, Enclosed is a copy of the 2014 -2015 Winter Use Permit request form for regional trail Chair segments located within your community. Please determine the level of winter use District 4 you are requesting, fill out the application form and follow the procedures outlined below. If your community does not plan to authorize any winter use activities, please indicate (none) in the box at the top of the permit and return it. John Gibbs District 5 The Winter Use Permit ultimately authorizes your City to utilize the section of trail for the use you request. Permitted activities are determined by individual communities, contingent upon Park District approval. An updated Certificate of Insurance, naming Three Rivers Park District as an additional named insured, should be submitted with Larry Blackstad the permit application, or it can be emailed directly to me. Coverage will need to Appointed show inclusive dates from November 15, 2014 through March 31, 2015. Please At Large include your proposed rules and regulations for winter use as well. Some cities have elected to pass Council actions authorizing multi -year Winter Trail Steven E. Antolak Activities Permit applications. This is completely acceptable to the Park District and Appointed may save you administrative time. If your city has already pre- authorized multi - At Large years, please submit an updated Winter Use Permit and Certificate of Insurance. As part of the attached permit, the city agrees to maintain the trail, including, but not limited to, any plowing, sweeping, sanding, packing, trash pick -up, and sign Boe Carlson replacement, between November 15, 2014 and March 31, 2015. Superintendent Page 1 Administrative Center, 3000 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Information 763.559.9000 • TTY 763.559.6719 • Fax 763.559.3287 • www.ThreeRiversParks.org Please send all information to my attention: Danny McCullough Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 If you have any questions regarding this process please contact me at 763 - 559 -6746 or Dmccullough (cbThreeRiversParkDistrict.org Thank you, Danny McCullough Regional Trail Manager Three Rivers Park District cdm -]Jd .. Enclosures Name of City. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT REGIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM 2014 -2015 WINTER USE PERMIT City Hall Phone Contact Person Phone ,r Contact Person Email Address Maintenance Contact Person . Phone I Maintenance Contact Person Email Address Regional Trail From to Authorized 2014 -2015 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2014 -2015 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2014 -2015 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2014 -2015 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2014 -2015 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2014 -2015 Winter Activities Authorization is hereby requested from the Park District Board of Commissioners to use portions of the Regional Trail Corridor for winter use activities from November 15, 2014 through March 31, 2015, as determined by each municipality within guidelines set forth herein on District Regional Trails located within individual City boundaries. It is understood and agreed that approval from the Park District Board of Commissioners is contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Park District, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its respective contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by the City, and /or anyone for whose acts and /or omissions they may be liable for related to the winter use of the Regional Trail Corridor. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the City of any statutory or common law defenses, Immunities, or limits on liability. The City cannot be required to pay on behalf of itself and Three Rivers Park District, any amounts in..excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. If City maintains.general liability insurance at the time this permit is issued, City shall provide the Park District with a Certificate of Insurance, naming Three Rivers Park- District as an additional named insured. 2. The City agrees to schedule regular trash . pick -up that is appropriate to the level' of use expected on the permitted section(s) of trail so as not to create conditions where trash containers are overflowing or offensively odorous. 3. The City also agrees to maintain the trail, induding,,but not limited to, any plowing, sweeping, sanding, packing, and sign replacement, from November 15, 2014 through March 31, 2015. For ice control on aggregate trails, Cities agree to use gray colored, 3/8" clear limestone chips from Edward Kramer and Sons, Burnsville, MN. Edward Kramer and Sons is the only aggregate pit that supplies the buff colored limestone that has been specified for use on these trails. Paved trails can be treated with a Corrosion Inhibited/Treated Rock Salt; (Specifications: A mixture of Regular Road Salt, Type I, Grade I, ASTM- D -632 - Modified per MN /DOT Specification, blended with a MN /DOT approved magnesium chloride -based product for anti -icing or deicing use or an approved blend of Regular Road Salt and a magnesium chloride -based product. The magnesium chloride - based product will also contain an agricultural processing. residue or an alternative MN /DOT approved agent that will depress the effective working temperature and decrease corrosiveness of the overall compound as well as prevent leaching of the treating solution) or other chemical treatments approved by the Park District. The City further agrees to immediately address all safety issues on or adjacent to trails. 4. The City will provide signage at locations approved by the Park District, notifying the public of authorized winter activities within its city limits; activities may include, but are not limited to, hiking, biking, cross - country skiing, snowshoeing, or walking. Winter use signs must be installed by the City at designated locations prior to November 15, 2014 and removed by the City no later than April 15, 2015. These signs are totally the responsibility of each municipality. 5. Snowmobiling is not allowed on Park District regional trails. Permitted use for snowmobiles will be limited to direct crossings only. The Hennepin County Regional -Railroad Authority ( HCRRA) does not allow snowmobiling or other motorized use within its corridors. The Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, . Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail, Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail, and 'the Dakota Rail Regional Trail are located on HCRRA corridor property and permission for a snowmobile crossing of an HCRRA corridor must be obtained from the HCRRA prior to requesting permission from the Park District for a snowmobile crossing of the regional trail within the corridor. If a snowmobile crossing Is. permitted, cities must take steps to keep snowmobiles from damaging paved trails, bridges and other property. 6. The City agrees to enforce rules and regulations established by the municipality as part of its request for a Winter Use Permit. 7. The City agrees to repair all trail surface damage that occurs as a result of winter trail activities and /or maintenance, including, but not limited to, bituminous /concrete repair, bridge deck repair, grading or adding aggregate pursuant toy guidelines established by the Park District. The City shall contact the Park District prior to the start of any surface repairs, for review of proposed repair plans and authorization to proceed. a I 8. The City agrees that winter trail use will be available to all persons, regardless of residence. Each City is required to submit its annual permit requests, including proposed rules and regulations, by October 15, 2014, after which the Park District may take up to 45 business days to- Each permit - request must be submitted as a result of formal. City Council action, with accompanying verification, agreeing to the terms and conditions outlined by the Park District's Winter Use Permit. The Park District reserves the right to terminate a permit at any time, if the conditions set forth herein are not followed. Signed: Date: i Title: W Page 1 of 3 From: Cary Teague <cteague @EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, September 08, 20141:00 PM To: James Grotz Cc: David Fisher Subject: RE: 5508 Dever Dr Setbacks Jim & Lori, The "fallback plan" needs a rear yard setback variance from 25 feet to 13.6 feet. Cary Teague, Community Development Director �} 9 ,.. •1. 952 - 826-04601 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 962 -826 -0236 s 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 eteagueAEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, (Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: James Grotz [ mailto :llm.Grotz @Raymondlames.coml Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 12:30 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: David Fisher Subject: 5508 Dever Dr Setbacks Dear Mr. Teague Re: Edina City Code Requirements and 5508 Dever Drive Setbacks Thank you for meeting with us on September 3, 2014 to discuss our concerns over plans which we were shown at the Neighborhood Demolition meeting on Tuesday, September 2nd, 2014 for the proposed teardown at 5508 Dever Drive, Edina. Part of our discussion centered around setbacks when a second alternative plan was presented. 1. Basic Requirements - The lot is a corner lot, as shown below (all definitions are from Edina City Code Section 36-10) ECC, Lot, corner, means a lot at the junction of and abutting on two or more intersecting streets, or at the point of deflection in alignment of a single street, the interior angle of which does not exceed 135 degrees. On a corner lot, the owner has the choice to select which is the front lot line. FCC, Lot line, front, means the boundary of a lot having frontage on a street The owner of a corner lot may select either frontage as the front lot line. - You were of the opinion that the owner had the option to choose the rear lot line. We believe that it follows from the choice of front lot line. ECC, Lot line, rear, means the boundary of a lot which is most distant from, and approximately parallel with, the front lot line. Once you have chosen a front line, the rear lot line is defined, and then so are the side lot lines ECC, Lot line, side, means any boundary of a lot which is not a front or rear lot line. mhtml :file: / /C: \Users\Jim\Desktop\RE 5508 Dever Dr Setbacks.mht 9/12/2014 2. Special Requirements Page 2 of 3 ECC Section 36 -439 provides special requirements for single family homes. Specifically 36-439 (1)e Rear yard setback, corner lots required to maintain two front street setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback'purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the`street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. - 5508 is a corner lot with no adjoining interior lot. 5508 does not require two front street setbacks. - This then requires consideration of Section 36-439 (1) b regarding side street setbacks: Side street setback The required side street setback.shall be increased to that required for a front street setback where there is an adjoining interior lot facing on the same street. The required side street setback for a garage shall be increased to 20 feet if the garage opening faces the side street. There is no adjoining interior lot on Dever Drive. Therefore there is no need to maintain two front yard setbacks, and hence the owner does not have any options to choose.a rear lot,line as allowed in 36-439 9 (1) e - We.do agree with you that the front yard `setback should be 46', as dictated by;46- 439 (1) a 1 Established front street setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one side of a street thdt ends'In a cul -de -sac, or on one side of a dead -end street, are occupied by dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows: 1. If there is an existing dwelling unit on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot, the front street setback requirement shall be the same as the front street setback of the dwelling unit on the abutting lot. 2. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lots. 3. In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all dwelling units on the some side of that street. 3. Compromise Plan submitted for 5508 Dever Drive I have attached the PDF file we discussed and you wanted to see. The file name is: "5508 Dever compromise setback.PDF" This was sent to us from Mr. Sahara and is shown as Page 1 of his 2 page pdf file. Please carefully study page 1 of his pdf file. It shows, in red, the proposed setback lines. It also shows on the left, in a red outlined text box, "Cary responded with requirements below." The plan shows a 46.1' setback from the east. This is the front yard setback required by the adjoining lot to the north. We presume this setback shown on the east side of the lot is the owners choice to be the front lot line, as he is allowed to do as shown in Section 1 above, per City code. Then according to the City code, the west side of the lot should be the rear lot line, and the north and south sides should be the side lot lines. However, the plan shows the rear setback being taken from the north lot line, and only aside yard setback taken on the west lot line! This does' not appear to comply with the City Code as outlined in Sections 1 and 2 above. How do these setbacks comply with City Code ? How did Mr. Sahara reach the conclusion that he can take a 46.1' setback from the east lot line(presumed his front lot line) yet call the north side lot his rear lot line ? inhtml:file: / /C: \Users \Jim\Desktop\RE 5508 Dever Dr Setback§.mht 9/12/2014 Page 3 of 3 4. "No variance" plan for 5508 Dever Drive At the Neighborhood Demolition meeting, on Tuesday September 2, 2014, a second "fallback" plan was presented by Mr. Sahara. He and his Builders said this plan would not require any variances. See attached PDF file: "5508 fallback plan.pdf ". - This fallback plan again'shows a 46.1' setback from the east. We assume this is their chosen front lot line. A 25' ( "rear yard ") setback is, shown on the north side of the house. A 13.6' ( "side.yard ") setback is shown on the west side of the house. An additional side yard setback of 20.41' is shown on the south side of the house. This is increased from the 15" requirement as there is a driveway on the south side. What we do not understand, when following,Edina City Code, how can a side yard setback can be taken on the rear (west) lot line, with no variance required. The fallback plan shows the front lot line is on the east; therefore the rear lot line must be on the west. Cary, you said you had received this plan from Mr. Sahara. Would this plan need a variance? We believe it does according to the Edina City Code. 5. Buildable area The area of this lot is about 11,400 square feet and code allows a building area of about 2,850 square feet. There are two buildable footprints, one with the front lot line on the east and the other with the front lot line on the south. In either case a 46.1 foot setback must be taken on the front lot line. We believe either buildable area would be about 3,000 square feet, allowing a 5,000 -6,000 square foot house to be easily built. • Would you please email us the possible two buildable footprints that can be used on this lot. When we met with you,.we showed you the 2 buildable area sketches we had and you did not disagree. • You had told us the homeowner could choose his rear lot line. Under City code "The owner of a corner lot may select either frontage as the front lot line ". Where in the code does it state the-owner of a corner lot may select their own rear lot line? We cannot find this. 5508 Dever Dr is a corner lot with no adjacent interior lot. Thank you for your time and assistance. Please notify us if or when additional plans are submitted for 5508 Dever Drive. Sincerely, Jim and Lori Grotz 5513 Park Place, Edina, MN Sept. 8, 2014 Home tel # 952 - 926 -2672 mhtml: file: / /C, \ UsersUim\Desktop\RE,55,Q8;Dever Dr Setbacks.mht 9/12/2014 .................................................. ti c Design as submitted for permit. .............. ...... ............................... 5508 Dever compromise setback.PDF PDF Page 1 of 2 Cary responded with requirements below. Codes to be considered front setback 46.1 ft. from street at east, Side street setback 20 ft. from street at south Backyard setback 25 ft, from north. These requirements would push the house west and south. Meeting the 46.1 ft. setback from the east prevents measuring the 25ft. backyard setback from the western boundary. TOP RAW 891.6— \ BOTTOM 888.6 S 8951'18° E -- 106.98 -- i 46.1' Front Yard setback LO co U u 0 N O b b -U N CD LA 30.1' 13.0' Side setback W � N i N 19.9' �O C N O i z� S 8951'18° E -- 106.98 -- G) y '0 41 (0 N .G t; O A � .ay Z S �7 \4� DWEWNG — 2,150 SQ. FT. LOT AREA — 11,403 SO. FT. COVERAGE — 18.9% i 46.1' Front Yard setback LO 0 N O b O 30.1' G) y '0 41 (0 N .G t; O A � .ay Z S �7 \4� DWEWNG — 2,150 SQ. FT. LOT AREA — 11,403 SO. FT. COVERAGE — 18.9% TOP WW 842.6- , Compromise I BOTTOMBBB.6 , S 89.51'18" E ............. ............................... / b 3 c. Design as submitted for permit. g P N rt ���� : • •••••• it cnjl� 5508 Dever compromise setback.PDF �.• �� •• m PDF Page 2 of 2 •• 3 • ............. 29.3... • r Reference - - -- w building, not / ............................................... ..............................: = I ••' steps •'•. This compromise location would require a variance. N � 19.9' (front/rear) � It aims to balance the interests of all neighbors. o r: >•.• - g _ :.............................................. ..............................r • cV z i 884- :. .. � ..- ... -. West 18.0 13 19.9 t North 4.7 25 20 East- 38 46.1 29.3 street SE- street 30.8 20 33.4 South- 43.5 20 23.7 street - taut' ��b �� `' DWElUNG - 2,150 SQ. FT. Q LOT AREA - 11,403 SO. FT. COVERAGE — 18.9% sc` Fo I OP i C sCi h�4j _ sAQgl' ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 225 0502 W W W.ADVSUR.COM SURVEY FoR LANDMARK BUILDING CONTRACTORS SURVEYED: August, 2013 DRAFTED. August 6, 2013 R VIA SE : Janunry 2, 2014 to show proposed dwelling, a— re te( d nprovetnents, grading, drainage and erosion consul etas s ur review and approval. REVISED: January 28.2014 to show top and bottom retaining wall proposed elevations. E ISED: July 3, 2014 to show lowered home. REVISED: July 22, 2014 to show trees removed, move proposed window well to front, add erosion cuntritl text. E IS D: August 27, 2014 to show possible placement of hone to mesa setback requirements for review. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block I, Sandy Ptncs, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the cngt and d rec an of boundary lines of the above logal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such us casements, that you wish shown an the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the locution of existing Impmvemeus we deemed important, 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the comers of the property. 4. Showing elevations on the site at belccted locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. The "elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use out this site. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: �" Denotes found iron pipe, unless otherwuse noted. CERTIFICATION: reby ecrttfy that this plan, speciftcatioo, re or survey was prcp by mu or under my direct supervision and that am a duly Liccatcd Profen a .W ssional Eugincer and Licensed Laud Surveyor under the Imes of the state orMiomesnoo. Signature: Jfami" ✓I., i DCLA A, Typed Name: James H. Parker Dole: AuLusi 27, 2014 R.S. No. 9135 5508 fallback plan.PDF GRAPHIC SCALE 70 o. to Go w ( is u=ser ) I Oa5t1NG DNEl1tIC t I. I 51 I 1 I I I I I I I W� I I �Fi Ira 1 oasaxo OKLUNG 5 895118' E 3 i to o° i 4--e z I O �I I 1 mss' �o I Q,e I All i I / I O . I R �A��� 7� ChRTfP1C.4Tls OP SURWY PROPOSffP 130985 2014 09 —97.4 JP September 8, 2014 Mr. James Hovland, Mayor Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50" St. Edina, MN 55435' Dear Mr. Hovland: We, the residents of Yorktown Continental at 7151 York Ave, Edina 55435, would like to call your attention to a serious problem and ask that you do whatever is in your power to correct it as soon as possible. This is the issue: The sidewalk between Yorktown Continental, 7151 York Ave, and Walgrens, 6975 York Ave So. is in terrible shape. This is a problem even in good weather and becomes a nightmare in rain, sleet and snow. A recent survey showed that 70 of our residents are permanently mobility challenged and 10% are temporarily mobility challenged due to surgery. That does not count those who are just slow moving due arthritis, or a bit dizzy from medications, etc. Many of our residents make the trip from our building to Walgreens several times a week. We would greatly appreciate your attention to this matter. Thank you. Regards, J. M. Brandt and the additional signers of the attached petition k � f I �,,,�p(� D �q L_ IAin�-_� 9�����j�� -��6I1A—L 5o Y k �04 -S 0� hl Lo 1s �rU� LO 04� &X�� VNA Heather Branigin From: Tara Tostenson <tara.tostenson @frauenshuh.com> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:19 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: GrandView Phase 1 Frauenshuh Letter Attachments: Frauenshuh_Letter GrandView Team.pdf Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Please see the attached letter from David Frauenshuh in connection with the GrandView Phase 1 project. Kind regards, Tara Tostenson Assistant to David Frauenshuh 7101 West 78th Street, Suite 100 1 Minneapolis,,MN 55439 P: 952 - 829 -3467 1 C: 612 - 756 -1317 tara.tostenson0 frauenshu h.com www.frauenshuhco mmercial. com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney - client or any other privilege. 1 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group September 11, 2014 Delivered via electronic mail Mayor Hovland and City Council Members 4801 West 500' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, In connection with our team interview with the City Council on September 2nd related to the GrandView Redevelopment Phase 1 Project, we'd like to provide you an update on our team resource plan and structure. As you are aware, our, technical planning team includes urban master planning /design (Reynolds Urban Design), public space/landscape planning (Confluence) and project management, engineering and ' design/build (Opus) capabilities. Our team brings a collection of local and national experience across all project types relevant,to the needs and goals of the GrandView District. We have decided to further augment our excellent team capabilities with a local design resource, Dean Dovolis of DJR Architecture. Frauenshuh, Inc. and DJR Architecture are excited to announce this integration to deliver a truly collaborative and dynamic plan that will aim to define the GrandView development as the new centerpiece district for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities region. Once again, we are excited to join with the City of Edina, its staff and community stakeholders to begin this exciting project. Sincerely, David R. Frauenshuh CEO and Founder ,7101 West 78- Street, Suite 100 93 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 Tel: 952.829.3480 0 FrauenshuhCommerdaLcom Heather Branigin From: NLC - National League of Cities <nlcmail @nic.org> Sent. Thursday, September 11, 201410:20 AM To: Edina Mail Subject. Let Austin Surprise You NATIONAL � LEAs -UE 0 of I ! E AUSTINJX J 2014 Think you know Texas? You may be surprised by what you discover in Austin at the 2014 Congress of Cities! Five things you may not know about this one -of -a -kind city: 1. In landmass, Austin is almost as large as New York City. You may not think "lush" when you think of Texas, But Austin's extensive land features miles of green rolling hills, beautiful tree -lined lakes, and fields of colorful wildflowers that thrive all year round. 2. You know to expect lots of Texas BBQ, but did you know that Austin is most famous for breakfast tacos? You'll see signs all over the city advertising Austin's favorite all -day breakfast food, with an option for every taste! 3. Austin is consistently ranked one of America's fittest cities —which probably has something to do with its 220 parks and running trails. 4. The Texas State Capitol is pink in color because of the "Sunset Red" granite used to build it in 1885. This remarkable structure is just a quick drive or 20- minute walk through downtown from the Convention Center. 5. Austin has a lot of interesting wildlife, but its most famous non - human population is the one million bats that live under the South Congress Bridge. At the conference, we'll catch the end of bat season, so you might see some putting on an aerial show during your visit: We can't think of a better place to learn new tools and strategies, exchange ideas with local leaders, and prepare for your city's future. Visit the website for more information, and register today for the best rate! The early bird deadline is September 30th! Follow ANLCEvents for regular updates and information. #NLCATX ® WMUSIC CAPITAL Of THEWO0tq National League of Cities 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite 550 Washington, QC 20004, Contact.Us: 1- 877 -827 -2385 Email: membership *nic.or Forward this Email to a Friend This message was intended for: edinamall0d.edina.mn.us You were added to the system June 22, 2012. For more Information click here. Update your NLC communications preferences Unsubscribe from ALL NLC messages 2 Heather Branigin From:. Joseph Fackel. <jfackel @retailstrategies.com> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 201412:29 PM' To: Joseph Fackel Cc Joseph Fackel Subject ICMA Annual Conference.in Charlotte Good morning, I wanted to send a note in advance of ICMA. Our team will be in Charlotte in force discussing the value Retail Strategies is bringing to.cities across the country. For too long, cities have invested in retail analysis, only to be left with reports, and no meaningful Strategy for retail recruitment. Our approach is much different — we work hand in hand with our clients from the Inception of the Strategy, through development of marketing materials, outreach to retailers and developers, trade show representation, and even incentive consulting where appropriate. Retail Strategies becomes an extension of you team dedicated to bringing new retail opportunities to your residents. If you would like to schedule a meeting, please let me know a time that is convenient, and I will make myself available to meet you. We can discuss your opportunities, along with your challenges and discuss an appropriate next step. If you are not sure of a specific time, please still drop by our booth ( #248) when you have a few minutes. Thanks for the interest, and safe travels to Charlotte! ' - Joe JOSEPH FACKEL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Retail Strategies, LLC 500 West 7th Street Suite 1 720 Fort Worth, TX 761.02 682.207.1100 Office 817.602.8531 Cell 205.313.3677 Fax ifackel @retailstrategies.com www.retalistrategies.com Retail STRATMES .. Y�ety �ny�,ruiue �nLinked�: _ . 1 Heather Branigin I , From: USCM/Tom Cochran < actionalert= usmayors .org @mail67.atl51.rsgsv.net> on behalf of USCM/fom Cochran <actionalert@usmayors.org> Sent Thursday, September 11, 20141:43 PM To: Edina Mail Subject REMINDER 2015 U.S. Conference of Mayors Education Online Playbook Now Open TO: . The Mayor THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 EYE SlItEL•T, hClRTHWE -S] NVA5RD:GToN. D.C. 20006 TELEPHONE f.04 2193-71"30 URC_ www.w mnyon.c: FROM: Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director On behalf of Denver Mayor Michael Hancock, Chair of the Educational Excellence Task Force and Task Force members, I am pleased to announce that the process for submitting applications for the 2015 Education Mayors Online Playbook is now underway. The Playbook will showcase the best education - related. policies, practices, and programs that mayors are working on in cities across the countrytIt is reflective of the Task Force goal of eliminating the academic achievement gap and the four key areas of focus: increase access to high quality early childhood education, increase the number of high performing seats in schools, keep students on -track to graduate, and ensure students have access to and complete a post - secondary pathway. The playbook will connect city mayors from across the country in easily sharing and accessing .information about key education initiatives. It will also serve as a tool that highlights the variety of ways that you, as mayors can take action t) uninate the achievement gap in your cities, regardless of your span of control or political affiliation. Both experienced "education mayors" aid mayors looking for an on -ramp into the education sphere can utilize this resource. As we all know, the quality of the public education systems in your cities is closely linked to the long -term health and well being of your economies and the competitiveness of our nation. 1 This is a reminder, and I. strongly encourage you to submit one or more of your own education initiatives for consideration. This is a great opportunity to share some of the successful work that you and your city have accomplished. The application must be completed by city staff members representing any mayor who is a member of The U.S. Conference of Mayors. The deadline for submitting your initiative for the.2015 Online Playbook is Friday, October 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM EST. The initial Playbook will be released at the winter meeting in January 2015. To learn more about the Playbook, or submit an idea, visit: ustnavors.or educationpla b�. If you have questions please contact Assistant Executive Director Kathy Wiggins at 202 -861- 6723 or kwigginsAusmavors.org. The United States Conference of Mayors 1620 I St, N.W. 4th Floor Washington: DC 20006 Add us to your address book imsubscribe from this list I update subscrip on preferences 1 update your contact information 2 Heather Branigin From: Maura Schnorbach < mschnorbach @stpatrick- edina.org> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:21 PM To: jim glick; Clare Sercombe (sercombe@g mail. com); ajohnson @beaconinterfaith.org; Angela Butel. ( Angela.Butel @cctwincities.brg); Anne`Shea; Boo Smith; Bernie Beaver (bbeaver44@gmail.com); bill dubbs (dubbs @williams- exec.com); 6jones @colonialchurch.org; bfvolunteers @breakingfree.net; Cappy; Cathy Burley (Cathy.abcexpress @gmail.com); cgodsall @live.com; Lisa Thompson (cre8vtype @gmail. "com); Jan Collins; Ratelle, John (John.Ratelle @marsh.com); Chris Haugen (chaug enl@comcast net); Dick Ward work (DWard @doughertymarkets.com); Dennis Fernkes; Homes for All (Dan @,mnhomelesscoalition.org); Dan Tysver (dtysver @bitlaw.com); Evans,. Marcia ( Marcia .Evans @ParkNicollet.com); Easy Bean (Easybean @fedtel.net); Erik Scheurle (gma343 @gmail.com); Fran Rusciano Murnane; frattei @stpetersedina.org; Erik Scheurle (gma343 @gmail.com); Gwen Budd; Gertrude Bdxius; 'Gerry Revier (Gerryj7@gmail.com); Mollie Sherry, Susie Van Hoomissen; halls329 @comcast.net; Helen Wood (Hwood.md @gmail.com); Brian Rusche, JRLC (info @jrlc.org); Jackie Sullivan (sullivan6832 @comcast.net); Katie Gebhard (kgebhard@ststephenchurch.org); Lisa Thompson (cre8vtype @gmail.com); Lynn Wan gen (lewangen @msn.com); Lisa Walker ( Lisa .Walker @hopkinsschools.org);, Marty Roers; Marcela Dalmaao; Edina Mail; Mary Everett, meg man nix@comcast.net; NjkA; Nancy Maeker, MSW USW Noya Woodrich (nwoodrich @gmcc.org); Nancy Lloyd; Jeffrey Ochs (ochs0021 @umn.edu); Pat & Jim Jenkins; Patrick Witherow; Pat & Susan Downey, Peter Schnorbach (pschnorbach @manh.com); Terri Ellis (tellisl1049 @gmail.com); Theresa Smith; Taige.Thomton @nseds.com; Tom Niedzielski; Terry Edam (tedam @stanclothier.com); Beryl McHale (berylmchale @gmail.com); Jim Wangen (wangen @msn.com); wag nerosa @usi ntemetcom; Clare Sercombe (sercombe@g mail. com); Diane Towalski (towalskid @archspm.org); Dick Mahoney (rmahoney @ mahoney- law.com); Donna Welsh (Welsh @comcast.net); Mary Anna Melacar (Marianna53 @msn.com); Rena Turnham (turnham @bitstream.net); Bob Busch; Colleen Sherry; Dan McMahon; David Cherne; Jim Mader, Mollie Paulson; Anita Valliere; Diane R. Kuehl; jim wangen (jim wangen @msn.com); Joe Klos; Judy & Bill Cunningham; rasandilla; arethlake @comcastnet; Betsey Violante (beviola @aol.com); glas5716 @stthomas.edu; Gwen Hagen; kelly Nitschke; mary everett, mary riley; matt houchin; Nancy Jurkovich; andy wolf; debbie burns; dryhaug; Jaclyn Parell Oleparell @gmail.com) ; joey herring; kelly hayes; kris Hayes; .michelle herring; morgan girard; neuberger; Steve Yanda; Sue Stenbeck (sstenbeck@co mcast. net); Teresa Olson, timmy odenbach Cc: Patricia Brady Subject: Fall Forum Speaker Series at St. Patrick's Church in Edina! Attachments: fall forum 2014.pptx Hello all, St. Patrick's will be holding a Fall Forum Speak er,Series in Octoberl We hope that you will join us! We have put together three evenings of engaging conversations with experts from the Twin Cities! All of the events will be in St. Martin's Hall from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The events are free and open to the public! On October 9 we will be discussing Youth, Poverty and Affordable Housing. Some of the key players who galvanized the community-to support the 66 West project will be sharing their experience with us! You will not want to miss it! r We will also have two great evenings focused on senior issues including Housing Options for Seniors on October 23 and Medicare on October 301 Often there are lots of questions about resources for seniors and it's hard to find the answers! These two evenings will feature experts who have valuable informatior about resources that are available for seniors and their children who may be seeking good.sources of information You are welcome to attend one or all three evenings! Feel free to share the flyer with your friends, families and colleagues! We look forward to seeing you at the Fall Forum Seriesl Best, Maura Schnorbach Social Justice Coordinator Saint Patrick's Catholic Church (952)941 -3164, ext.142 mschnorbach @stoatrick- edina.ore J c� ' '4t C ``c-e, � `�, s Av"n tc "Y'O %A- Deoyv4m 06C Vote Celo ve'ct ! �ia�sc �d l Mayor Hovland- I want to thank you for the opportunity for Doran Companies to interview for the Grandview Redevelopment. We are excited about the opportunity and would love -to- collaborate on the possibilities with you. We are committed to working directly with the City and its residents ion successfully bringing this project to fruition. Thank you for considering Doran Companies. '> el OJI-A �17 U ,,yam ,cat �4%�../�- ...«-- JI.f"��. I A AA 11-h ov rev�'ot� I bb wae v T fay PAIR v All V"tv 'o ry) J°u o 6fv 4v V V' LA va 47 jewl, l 4t �t J TCF:Bankbuflding Ncated ;at 3330 t been Toned as a regionalmedical zone ' - lsmg foryoungfiomelessteenayers on+ m Edina with �nadequat���arlarig�does ,on,s other 19 properhes,_vuould markedly; 11 lave a de��asrtang effect =on out ela us protect nurMedical Gli`nics: senior `:.' A quarterly publication of the Metropolitan Airports Commission - Noise Program Office Noise Complaints at MSP Airport Aircraft noise complaints Associated with Minneapolis -St Paul International Airport (MSP) numbered 11,501 in July 2014, a 21 percent increase compared to July 2013. More than 715 households in over 25 communities submitted complaints about arriving or departing flights that they felt were operating too early or late, excessively noisy, low- flying, and/ or too frequent. Ninety -three percent of these complaints were submitted by households located in Minneapolis, Edina, Eagan, Richfield, and Mendota Heights, according to the July 2014 Technical Advisor's Report What happens with these complaints? The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has sole authority to determine where aircraft fly and how the airspace around any airport is used So while the Metropolitan Airports Commission owns and operates MSP and six general aviation airports in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, MAC staff do not control air traffic operations, detem ine runway use or direct aircraft in flight The MAC Noise Program Office staff do document and assess aircraft noise airspace safety considerations all play a part in how air traffic controllers operate at any given time. Runway use decisions at MSP are made by air traffic controllers based upon standard complaints daily and respond to air traffic control procedures anyone who requests information (including noise abatement about aircraft activity. Staff also collects flight tracking data and make them available online via the www.macnoise.com website (www.macnoise.com / tools- reports /flighttracker) . These data help answer many questions about aircraft activity. Aircraft noise complaints are shared with the MAC board, MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) members, aircraft operators, and community representatives and are published on the MAC Noise Program Office website ( www.macnoise.com). Operational factors such as wind and weather, the number of arrivals and departures, the time of day, construction activity and procedures), safety, weather, operational needs of aircraft, and environmental dynamics (e.g. glare, wildlife, wind shear, etc.). Noise complaints alone are not used by controllers for making runway use decisions, particularly since concerns exist from all areas surrounding MSP. However, complaints can be helpful when used in conjunction with operational data to corroborate specific events or to identify operational trends. What is the MSP Noise Oversight Committee? The MAC established the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) in August 2002 to bring industry and community (Continued on page 3) r � � NOC News S P The MSP Noise Oversight Committee x (NOC) met aP _0 on July 16, ���R6�C8T eo�. 2014 and discussed the following topics: Annual MSP Nighttime Operations Assessment 2012 - 2013 MAC staff briefed NOC members on the results of the nighttime assessment for 2012 and 2013 (see article on page 3). MACNOMS Validation Study A summary of the MAC Noise and Operations Monitoring System ( MACNOMS): validation process and study results was provided to NOC members and discussed. This report may be found at, www.macnoise.com/macnoms- validation-st udy-2014.pdf Aviation Innovations Captain Mark Bradley, chief technical pilot, Delta Air Lines, provided a presentation about innovations in aircraft design. The presentation is available on the MAC Noise Program Office website at www.inacnoise.com- our-neighbors/videos. Aircraft Operations Summary MAC staff briefed NOC members about aircraft noise complaints, air carrier passenger numbers, aircraft operations activity, runway use, and noise abatement procedure compliance associated with/ Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Next NOC Meeting The NOC meets bi- monthly. The next meeting is scheduled for September 17, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. at the Metropolitan Airports s Commission General Offices, 6040 28th Ave. South, Minneapolis. For more information call 612 -726- 8100. Assessing MSP Airport's Nighttime Aircraft Activity The average number of operations occurring between 10:30 p.m. and 6 a.m. each day at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) was 6.2 percent higher in 2013 compared to 2012, but still 4.9 percent lower than in 2011, according to a recent study conducted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise Program Office. The Annual MSP Nighttime Operations Assessment is used to track trends for nighttime MSP arrival and departure activity by reporting the actual number of flights and average number of flights per nighttime period. In 2013, 12,868 arrival and 4,011 departure operations occurred at MSP during nighttime hours, an average of 46.2 operations per nighttime period. In 2012, the average was 43.5: 11,906 arrivals and 3,995 departures. Eighty -nine percent of nighttime operations at MSP in 2013 and 90 percent in 2012 were related to air carrier jet activity. Peak nighttime activity occurred in 2007 with 73.2 average daily nighttime flights. To view the full report, visit the MAC Noise Program Office website Annual Reports page: www.macnoise.com /tools- reports /annual- reports. Noise Complaints (Continued from page.1) representatives together to ":.address aircraft noise issues at MSP. The NOC engages the public in valuable discussions about aircraft noise and, based on those discussions, brings policy recommendations to the MAC in an ongoing .effort to reduce noise impacts for MSP's neighbors. The NOC meets every other month. Membership includes representation for the cities of Bloomington, Eagan, Mendota Heights, Minneapolis and Richfield. The cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Edina, Inver Grove Heights, St: Louis Park, St. Paul and Sunfish Lake share an at -large representation. The aviation industry is represented on the NOC by one scheduled passenger airline, one cargo air carrier, one charter/ scheduled operator, a chief pilot of an airline serving MSP, a MSP Noise News Going Exclusively Electronic The 2014 Winter edition of the MSP Noise News newsletter will be the last hard copy edition sent by USPS mail. Beginning with the Spring 2015 edition, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) will provide updates about noise issues associated with Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport exclusively online at www.macnoise.com. Readers who wish to continue to receive news updates should register on the website at https://www.mamoise.com/ user /register and subscribe to All News Content. Readers who do not wish to register can still get the most recent news at Public Input Meeting Scheduled for October 28 Please join Metropolitan Building, 6040 28th Avenue Airports Commission staff at South, Minneapolis. the next Aircraft Noise Public Input Meeting on Tuesday, This is an opportunity for October 28, 2014 at 7 p.m. at residents to ask questions and the Metropolitan Airports learn more about changes that Commission General Office can impact aircraft noise and efforts to mitigate it. member of the Minnesota Business Aviation Association (MBAA), and an at -large member. A summary of the NOC meeting held in July 2014 can be found on page 2. Learn more about the NOC on the MAC Noise Program Office website at' . www.macnois e. com / our- neighbors/rnsp- noise- oversight-conunittee-noc.♦ www.macnoise.com or by subscribing to the RSS feed. To start receiving electronic news notifications right away, please sign up online at https://www.macnoise.com/ user /register. If you have questions about the transition, please call 612-726- 94114 For more information, please contact Christene Sirois Kron at 612 - 725 -6455 or Chris tene. SiroisKron @mspma c. org. r ° 6040 28th Avenue S. "+ + m Minneapolis, MN 55450 9 O O 1 s l }i +, 00 ~SIR OA � A quarterly publication of the Metropolitan Airports Commirsion - Aviation Noire Programs Phone: 612- 725 -6455 Noise Complaint Line: 612 - 726 -9411 E -mail: info @macnoise.com Website: macnoise.com >>» llhlr, ������1�> i�l�'l n��l�ul> li,i>ti11�II��rI� »��•.Ill�iln�, "I WWBPIWIMS�V. SCOTT N EAL OFFICE'OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH ST EDINA. MN 55424 -1394 PRESORTSTD U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT# 92431. TWIN CITIES, MN Fall 2014. Inside this is Connect with,Your MAC Representative This month the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) board will hold its Noise Complaints at 1 regularly scheduled meeting in Eagan rather than at the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSP Airport International Airport Members of the public are encouraged to attend and participate. NOC News Monday, September 15, 2014 at 7 p.m. Assessing MSP 2 Eagan Community Center, 1501 _ Central Parkway, Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Airport's MAC Phone: 612- 726 -8100; Eagan Community Center Phone: 651 -675 -5550 Aircraft Activity MSP • _ News The MAC's board meetings are held the third Monday of each month at Going 1 Pm. However, at least one meeting each year is. held in the evening in the Electronic community so that community members unable o attend during daytime hours have the opportunity to engage in discussion with MAC representatives. Public for October 28 Board meeting agendas and minutes may be found at: www.metroairports.org /Airport Meeting Scheduled - Authority/ Metropolitan- Airports- Commission /Public- Meetings /Public- Meetings.aspx. If you no longer wish to receive this publication, and other airport noise related Information, please call or e-mail Christene Sirois Kron at 612 - 725 -6455 or Christine .SiroisKron @mspmac.org. In your email, please write the word "delete" in the subject line, followed by your street address and city. Printed on Recycled Paper Iasi 1881 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IX. A. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subjects Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment:' Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina .• 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 �Z Jm u104da +r yo! }0')!PaP P"lo 4"ocldnS J rnok Aoj nok -0 , ors � AU ?�" /k� V\„6(► 1 Heather Braniain From: M. J. Huber <mjhuber @hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 13,_201412:21 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Please keep Fred Richards Golf open, we play golf and then lunch at nearby restaurants and afterwards shop at the area malls. Much of the benefits are invisible unless you look for them. But there is plenty of room there to work in some trails and picnic areas but it does not lend itself to such use to any significant level. I suspect your redevelopment costs and maintenance costs will exceed the minor operating losses that have arisen from several years of poor weather. And if you work with the local primary and high schools to get all kids an opportunity to play, you could probably cover your costs and turn it into a real incubator for Minnesota golf. Think big, pleasel Sincerely, Mark Huber 969 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 3253 N. Girard Ave. Mpls,. MN mihuber @Hotmail.com 1 Heather Braniain From: Matt Kompelien <mattkompelien @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 6:56 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 15 acre parcel near Weber Park Mr. Hovland - I saw a topic regarding a plot of land that Minneapolis is selling next to Weber Park in the Star Tribune a week or so ago. This land is where I started and learned to mountain bike, and I would like to keep it that way for more people to come. Mountain biking is a rapidly growing sport, and Edina High School is attempting to get a mountain bike team started. There is one problem- there are no mountain bike parks in Edina. If this was turned into a. mountain bike park, the team would take ofF,and many kids and adults .would become engaged in the sport. Permits to ride there would also be an option, and would eventually become a profit It would be a win -win situation- Edina makes a profit, and mountain bikers have a conveniently located mountain bike park, along with any others who could try out the sport. I hope you and the community will support this idea. This link is a video of how Cottage Grove made a bike park under similar circumstances. httip://m.youtube.com/watch?v--LBP-jNe2vU4 Sincerely, Matt,Kompelien 7th Grader at South View Middle School 1 Heather Branigin From: Robert Mayer <rsml627 @aol.com> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 201412:17 PM , To: Edina Mail; Scott H. Neal Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmaii.com Subject: Edina - -A Welcoming Community I wanted . to express a concern. I had the opportunity to serve as a member of the Human Rights and Relations Commission. As a member of the Commission, I was proud to have helped move Edina to be a more welcoming committee. When I interviewed to be on the Commission, my goals were to help Edina move forward and be more responsive to issues felt by newcomers when they move into the Community. At the time, I indicated a number of items that I personally experienced and have subsequently experienced in the 12 years that I've lived in Edina. Although there are still challenges, I believe the accomplishments during my term were significant and are being moved forward by current leadership. One item that was initially reviewed during my term was the Religious Observance Policy. I was proud to see that it was approved in 2012. That's why I was disappointed when I heard about the City scheduling a Community Event on October 4 - -You Kippur. It surprises me and frankly greatly concerns me when I also heard that -- although it was a scheduling mishap - -an alternative (i.e. rescheduling, etc.) wasn't immediately done. In my opinion, responding quickly to postpone an event like this would be an important step in effectively implementing this Policy and truly encouraging participation by all the members of the Edina Community in an event. Delaying reinforces a perception that Edina may not be moving forward in ways that I believe both of you have so positively encouraged. New Posts WW Small Area Plan Discovery Workshop Set for Saturday, Oct 4th MJ Lamon, City of Edina CITY The meeting schedule has been set for the for the Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road small area planning process! The first event is'a. Discovery Workshop on Saturday, October 4. Enjoy free breakfast from Snuffy's Malt Shop starting at Sam. followed by the workshop from 9am to noon. Bring comfortable shoes and your smart phone. The meeting location is the former bike shop at Edina Village Market, 4805 Valley View Road. See the rest of the schedule and read'about the WW i z Heather Braniain From: mjoas @comcast.net Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:00�` PM' ' To: Josh Sprague Cc: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Mary Brindle (Comcast);'Ann Swenson; Joas, Margaret Subject: Re: Re sewer back up . RL•m1 Thank you for your response. You are now the :second City Council member to contact,us. I mailed via the US postal service the packet of information /pictures in Mid August. I sent an email last week because I had not heard from any Council Member or the Mayor. Your response raised a couple of additional questions in which we would appreciate your follow up. Given that we had over 3 feet of pooled water in front of our house which prompted our call to the city at 9 am what should.we or could we have done to seek help? The pooled water sat on the road for a couple hours. Vehicles could not drive down the road during this time period would your response be the same if a first responder could not respond to a fire /medical emergency? Is a sewer backup any different? As you stated" 60 homes" had, back ups, I assume sewer back ups from your response. To suggest that the city will have better insurance in the future is to imply that this will happen again. We want to know what internal investigation has taken place to follow up on the activities, alarms, and procedures that were taken on June 19th? Are there emergency policies and practices? Surely, Tonka Bay pumped their sewage into tanks so that they did not have back ups into their communities basement; what could Edina have done to prevent the back up in 60 basements? At 4pm on June 19th, Brian Olson, spoke to my husband, Bill, via the phone and told him that additional rain was on the way and that the sewer system may back up again. Furthermore, Brian Olson told Bill that the city of Edina now had approval from the environmental authorities to "dump" sewage into 9 mile creek if it was a matter of sewage going into basements: Why was'nl this issue addressed before the sewage system was overloaded? According to the City of Edina website, the city has 23 sanitary sewage lift station. One would assume that the public works would be able to calculate the amount of rain actually received and.thus know the sewage and storm drain situation. Obviously, the sanitary lift stations failed. The rain had stopped by 10:45 am on June 19th yet sewage backed up in our basement shortly after 11 am on June 19th. Furthermore, as stated in our letter to you the road broke down due to the removal of the top layer of black top. As a result the water that should have went down into the-storm drains,instead bypassed the higher elevated storm drains and fill the street with water and covered the sanitary sewer cover. And the water sat and sat on the sanitary storm sewer cover outside our house. Honestly, the sewage backup ruined our summer. Having to deal with our basement being ruined, all the carpet had to be removed, the entire area had to be sanitized, walls had to be cutout, and then the recovery. Not to mention our kids play space was not able to be used and our summer focus shifted to cleaning up the basement. Yes, we had sewage back up insurance but we also had a $7,500 deductible. To answer your question, Bill, called Chad Milner as Scott.Neal's email asked and Chad did not know why he was receiving a call or where, we lived. Obviously this issue was not important enough for Scott to have a conversation with Chad. This is very frustrating because the city stance is that they. "do not pay out" but the lack of interest in our situation demonstrates that the officials and employees do not care or follow up. Margaret and Bill Joas 6409 Biscayne Blvd. From;_ "Josh Sprague" <joshspragueCa�edinarealty.com> To: "Joas; Margaret <mjoas(&-comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 8:26:39 AM Subject:. Re sewer back up Mr and Mrs. Joas: I received your letter. I have also reviewed the response that Manager Neal sent you. Have you taken him up on the offer to meet with staff concerning future mitigation in the area? I do know we had approximately 60+ backups due to the extraordinary rainfall event, and due to the current insurance scope, there is not reimbursement available under these circumstances. In the future, we will have a new insurance contract through League of MN Cities that will offer some limited additional coverage for residents. It would be good for you too receive more information about that if you meet with staff as well. So sorry for your loss, both financially and otherwise. It was a very difficult event for a lot of people in our town, including neighbors. Cordially, Josh Sprague. Edina City Council Josh js josh sprague, realtor edina realty 6800 france cell/text 612.501.0252 http: / /ooshsprague.com 2 Heather Braniain From: Sherry Butcher Wickstrom <sbutcherwickstrom @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 16,2014 11:24 AM To: Edina Mail. Subject: Support for Sherry Butcher \Afickstrom Hello Jim, It's Sherry Butcher Wickstrom from Eden Prairie writing to you! Jim, you are probably aware that I am running for the City Council one more time, if elected' this would be my fifth term, and my last. I know you have been so gracious in the past to support me and I am wondering if I would be able to use your name as a supporter? We will do a newspaper ad in the Eden Piairie News the week before election, and I would love to be able to add your name to my list of endorsements. Thank you for considering my request, and please let me know what you think. My website is sherrybutcherwickstrom.com Warm regards, Sherry i STONE 1000 East 8014 Street September 9, 2014 Bloomington, MN 55420 Phone: 952.884.0376 1 Fax: 952.884.2135 cornerstonemn.org James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear James, Over the past 30 years, Cornerstone has developed a reputation as an innovator in the field of domestic violence. Since opening our doors in the fall of 1983, the agency has enjoyed significant programmatic growth and has celebrated numerous milestones. While Cornerstone's success is attributed to the hard work of staff, organizational oversight by the Board of Directors, and the generosity of volunteers and donors, it is without a doubt the passion of Cornerstone's Executive Director, Susan Neis, that has advanced the agency to become an exemplary victim - centered service provider. Susan's and Cornerstone's legacy have been intertwined for much of the agency's history. Her 29 year tenure has focused on building capacity to provide comprehensive, holistic services to all victims of interpersonal violence. As a champion for youth who historically were considered secondary victims and lacked specialized services, Susan lead the effort to establish the first comprehensive children's program in Minnesota for youth affected by domestic violence that truly meets the needs of youth in our community. Over the years, through effective programming and accessible services, Cornerstone has become a celebrated leader. It is because of Susan's commitment to youth that thousands of children have received counseling, enrichment activities, and therapy to mitigate the harmful effects of the violence they've experienced. It is because of Susan's devotion to those devastated and traumatized by the effects of violence that an endless number of families have restored hope and begun to rebuild their lives. It is because of Susan's vision that Cornerstone is what we are today. Please join me in honoring Susan for her tireless work and dedication to Cornerstone as she prepares for retirement at the end of this year. Your special gift to Cornerstone is a tribute to Susan's legacy. With gratitude, Dick Strassburg Board Chair, Cornerstone P.S. We hope you are able to join us at Susan's retirement party on October 2 from 4 -7 p.m. at the Calhoun Beach Club. RSVPs and questions may be directed to monicab @comerstonemn.org. X41-A-9:1171 4- e-:f%� 4_0_:*� 447 a- • S Department of Employment and Economic Development September 12, 2014 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor, City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: DEED is pleased to announce the recent awards from the Redevelopment Grant Program. Following is a list of the projects selected for funding along with the grant amounts. GRANTEE PROJECT GRANT AWARD Edina Pentagon Revival $625,000 Mankato Bridge Plaza $204,175 Minneapolis Broadway Flats Redevelopment $300,000 Minneapolis Downtown East $500,000 The Redevelopment Grant Program continues to be a very popular program that is over - subscribed with funding requests. We are very proud of this program and the positive effects it has on communities. We are pleased to partner with our grantees to revitalize areas and provide opportunities for job creation and tax base increases that help our communities and State thrive. Congratulations to the above grant recipients! They can be proud of a job well done! For additional information, contact Meredith Udoibok at 651 - 259 -7454. My best regards, Katie Clark Sieben Commissioner C: Senator Melisa Fanzen Representative Paul Rosenthal Mr. Cary Teague, City of Edina Business and Community Development Division 1st National Bank Building ■ 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 ■ Saint Paul, MN 55101 -1351 USA ■ www.mn.gov /deed Toll Free: 800 - 657 -3858 ■ Phone: 651 - 259 -7114 ■ Fax: 651 - 296 -5287 ■ TTY 651 - 296 -3900 AN EOUIW OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND SERVICE PROVIDER To: Edina City Council From: Edina Community Health Commission (CHC) Date: September 16, 2014 Subject Grandview Redevelopment Site Attachments: None Action Requested: Item IX. B. /-4 O \�bltPOlip�i/ ItltlU That in the City's process of evaluating and determining the developer for the Grandview Redevelopment Site that the health of the community (Health in All Policies) be a point of emphasis with the developers and that any plan take into account, as a primary consideration, community health. Situation: In the United States, the cost of health care continues to rise at a significant rate. This is due to complex set of circumstances that at least in part relate to people's choices and habits and a lack of community focus on the health of residents. Some indicators of poor health, such as the percentage of the Minnesota population that are obese (- -25 %) (MN Dept. of Health citing BRFSS data), are reaching concerning levels. To address diseases such as obesity and other health related issues, such as access to opportunities to improve health, many cities in Minnesota and cities in other states are increasing their focus on the health of those that live and work in their community. Assessment/Recommendation: The CHC believes that a primary consideration during the City's evaluation of developers of the Grandview Redevelopment Site should include focus on uses that promote the physical, mental, and social well -being of those that live and work in Edina (Health in All Policies). For example, the City should consider whether the site includes, consistent with the City's Request for Interest Guiding Principles 4, 6, and 7: facilities or space that supports fitness or health related activity, open green space that can be used in a way that supports health, and has space dedicated for events /activities and an access plan that create and facilitate easier community connections. With regard to Edina seniors, the Edina Senior Center's proximity to the Grandview Site provides the opportunity for easier access to uses incorporated into the site that promote health. A Lack of adequate access to health promoting activities for Edina's significant senior population is a gap the CHC has identified in its community health analysis. MINUTES Regular Meeting of the .Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina Historical Society - Arneson Acres Tuesday, June 10, .2014 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Vice Chair Weber and Members Moore, Sussman, O'Brien, Christiaansen, and McLellan. Absent were Members Birdman, Mellom, McDermott, Brandt and Johnson. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Planner Repya asked that a revision to the plans approved on February 11, 2014 for COA H -14 -1 is added to the agenda under item # VI. Reports & Recommendations. Member Moore moved approval of the meeting agenda to include the item requested by Planner Repya. Member Christiaansen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES May 13, 2014 Member Sussman asked for his comments on the COA request for 4601 Browndale Avenue reflect his observation that "The proposed stone surrounding the front entry is. not unique in the district - on a drive thru, at least 15 homes with similar stonework were identified ". Member Moore moved approval of the May 13, 2014 minutes including Member Sussman's request for clarification of his comments. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. H -14 -1 4612 Arden Avenue - REVISED front entry overhang Planner Repya reminded the board that at the February I I' meeting a COA was approved for 4621 Arden Avenue (H- 14 -1). The plans included the conversion of an attached garage in the rear yard to living space and the construction of a new detached garage; as well as the addition of a small front entry overhang supported by brackets that extended 3'3" from the front building wall of the home. Ms. Repya explained that this afternoon the applicant submitted plans for a revision to the front entry overhang. The revised plans demonstrate an increase to the depth of the overhang by 6" bringing the new depth to 3'9" removing the supporting brackets; and adding two 10" paneled posts; and lastly, adding an ellipse to the front arch of the overhang. Staff finds that the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 10, 2014 changes are in keeping with the Colonial Revival architectural design of the home and would recommend approval of the requested revisions subject to the plans presented dated June 11, 2014. Member Comments: Members McLellan; . Christiaansen, and Sussman commented that the revisions proposed for the front entry overhang are complimentary to the house and an enhancement to the plans originally presented. Motion: Member Sussman moved for approval of the proposed revisions to the front entry overhang for COA H -14 -1, 4612 Arden Avenue, subject to the plans dated June 11, 2014. Member Christiaansen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VII. OTHER BUSINESS . A. Explore the History of Your Home : No report at this time Vill. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Moore reported that the 2014 Heritage Award. presentation to Brian and Linda Tell, owners of the Arthur Erickson house, 5501 Londonderry Road was well received by the City Council and Community at large. The award has created a considerable amount of buzz about the property, with the Tell's commenting that friends are coming out of the,woodwork asking for a tour of their home. Mr. Moore added that Channel 1;6 did a lovely piece on the award for the "Agenda Edina" program, and a story about the home will be included in the Summer issue of "About Town ". X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Repya reminded;.the board-that she and Consultant Vogel visited Marri Oskam, the owner of,6901 Dakota Trail regarding the potential for designating her home a heritage landmark. Designed by one of the first female architects in Minnesota, Lisle Close,.this Contemporary style home was. built in 1963 on the banks of Indianhead Lake, and 'is truly a treasure. In addition to Mrs. Oskam, the owner of the architectural firm Close and Associates Gar Hargens, and Larry Millett, a local preservationist were included in the meeting. Ms. Repya reported. that she provided information about the heritage landmark designation process, and invited Mrs. Oskam to submit a written request to explore the potential landmark designation of her home. Mr. Hargens also agreed to provide archive information_ relative to the home that Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes June 10, 2014 he may have in his company files. The board was enthusiastic' about the potential for considering a landmark designation of Mrs. Oskam's home, and thanked Ms. Repya for the report. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE July 8, 2014 - Summer Tour Planner reported that the annual summer tour is planned for the regular July 8`h meeting. This year, the Savory Gardens neighborhood which includes a large concentration of mid - century Lundgren homes has been chosen. Member Christiaansen lives in the neighborhood - her home was built by Lundgren, and she has generously offered to help plan the tour. Member O'Brien asked if it would be possible to start the tour prior to 7:00 p.m. Ms. Repya responded that typically the board likes to meet earlier on the tour nights to take advantage of as much daylight as possible. She added that the change in the meeting time and place needs to be posted for the public. Board members agreed that meeting at 6:00 p.m. would be a good idea. Ms. Repya pointed out that currently, it appears that there will be 2 COA applications to consider in July; and since the tour will take the entire meeting, she recommended that the official business of the board be moved to a special meeting on an alternate date. After a brief discussion, it was agreed that Ms. Repya would tally the board regarding their availability for July 9`h, 10`h, 16`h, or i r; and will schedule the special meeting on the date that works for the majority of the board. XII. ADJOURNMENT 7:20 p.m. Member Moore moved for adjournment at 7:20 p.m. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Following the adjournment of the official meeting, the board was privileged to have a guided tour of the "Edina on the Map" exhibit led by Edina resident/historian & surveyor Frank Cardarelle, and Historical Society Executive Director, Marci Matson. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 3 HERITAGE Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) "PRESERVATION BOARD, Type "1" under the month for each attending member. NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session or Session # of IVltgs. Attendance.: %': MeetingsMork Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Birdman, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 50% Christiaansen, Jennifer 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Mellom, Joyce 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Moore, Bob 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Sussman, Peter 2/1/20151 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% McDermott, Connie 2/1/2016 1 1 13% O'Brien, Tim 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Weber, Ryan 2/1/2016 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Brandt, Andrew student 1 1 2 25% Johnson, Nathan student 0 0% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type 1" under'Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. "A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage preservation Board ANNUAL SUMMER TOUR Savory Gardens Neighborhood 5300 Whiting Avenue Tuesday, July 8, 20 li 4 6:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO.ORDER 6:00 P.M. 00. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Vice Chair Weber and Members Moore, Mellom, O'Brien, Christiaansen, and McLellan. Absent were Members Birdman, Sussman, McDermott, student members Brandt and Johnson. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. 111. 2014 SUMMER TOUR - Savory Gardens, 5300 Whiting Avenue & the "Lundgren" Midcentury Modern Style homes in the surrounding. neighborhood. Savory Gardens, a long standing nursery business nestled into a residential neighborhood harkens back to the days when Edina was dotted with vegetable and hobby farms. In 1946, the Savory family purchased 12 acres of land in the area, and even though much of their property was sold off for residential development, the family continued to maintain their homestead and the nursery business. Savory Gardens is a treasure in Edina that few people are aware of. Specializing in hybrid hostas, they have made a name nationally for growing the number' of species from just 20 to over 2,000 varieties. Mrs. Arlene Savory shared her reminiscence of the family business and the growth she has seen in the neighborhood over the years. Board members agreed that a visit to Savory Gardens should be on all Edinan's "to do" lists. After visiting with Mrs. Savory, the tour continued through the surrounding neighborhood on Whiting Avenue and West 64' Street where there are a large concentration of homes (many Mid - Century style) built during the 1960's by Lundgren Contemporary, Inc.. Lundgren built many homes throughout Edina, which typify the post war construction that was prevalent during the period when Edina experienced unprecedented residential growth. Barry Lundgren, the builder's son resides in one of his father's homes at 5330 Whiting Avenue, and the board had the good fortune to have Barry and his wife Karen lead the Lundgren house tour when he shared reflections on his dad's business and the impact it had on Edina's residential landscape. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes July 8, 2014 Barry and Karen also generously opened their home to the tour group where they pointed out architectural features that were unique to the style of homes his father built. Some of those features included stone floors . in the entryway; open stairs, redwood ceilings, and sliding-patio doors (which in the 1960's had to be shipped from California.) The tour ended at the home of Member Christiaansen, which is one of the "Lundgren" homes featured on the tour. Many of the Midcentury Modern features identified in`Barry and Karen Lundgren's home were evident in the Christiaansen's home as well.. As the tour ended, the board agreed that walking a neighborhood provided a valuable perspective one doesn't experience when reading reports and viewing photos and maps. A special thanks was offered to Member Christiaansen- who coordinated the tour. And finally, the board agreed that they looked forward to the 2015 summer, tour, wherever in Edina it may be. IV. OTHER BUSINESS - None V. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None VI. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE August I It' (MONDAY) VOL XII. ADJOURNMENT 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya HERITAGE PRESERVATION Type 1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum BOARD Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Birdman, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 50% Christiaansen, Jennifer 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Mellom, Joyce 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Moore, Bob 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Sussman, Peter 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/20171 1 1 1 1 5 83% McDermott, Connie 2/1/2016 1 1 13% O'Brien, Tim 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Weber, Ryan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Brandt, Andrew student 1 1 2 25% Johnson, Nathan student 0 0% Druckman, Joe Otness, Peter student student 0 0 #DIV /0! #DIV /01 Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically__ INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meetinq Held ION MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded ION MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type 1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: SUMMARY Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Monday, August 11, 2014 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL - NO QUORUM Answering roll call were Members Christiaansen, Mellom, Moore, and Sussman. Absent was Chair Birdman and Members O'Brien, McDermott, McLellan, Weber and student members Brandt and Johnson. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel was also in attendance. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES June 10, 2014 and July 8, 2014 Continued until the September 9, 2014 meeting. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. Edina Heritage Landmarks: Determination of Eligibility for ten properties Planner Repya and Consultant Vogel provided background information on the following 10 properties recommended to be added to the list of "Determined Eligible" properties: . Schaefer House & Stable - 5117 Schaefer Road 2. Arthur Erickson House* - 5501 Londonderry Road 3. Paul & Mary Carson House "MaryHill" - 6001 Pine Grove Road 4. Mill Pond Cascade, Minnehaha Creek - W. of Hwy 100 S. Claude D. Kimball House - 4520 W. 44`h Street 6. American Foursquare House - 4247 Grimes Avenue 7. Johnson House - 4300 France Avenue 8. Marri & Hendrik Oskam House - 6901 Dakota Trail 9. Bruce A. Abrahamson House - 7205 Shannon Drive 10. Sara Moore House - 6909 Hillcrest Lane Consultant Vogel advised the board that the identified properties have been included at either the request of the property owner or the HPB. No formal action was taken VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. Work Plan 2014 Update: Planning for Sept 16th Council Work Session Board members reviewed the updates provided for the 2014 Work Plan and agreed that this was good information to share with the City Council at the September 16th Work Session. No formal action was taken. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Meeting Summary August 11, 2014 B. Work Plan 2015 Planning: Due October 1st Planner Repya prepared suggested 2015work initiatives for the HPB to consider for the upcoming City Council Work Session on September 160. Members present commented that the proposed initiatives appeared realistic and added that they looked forward to sharing them with the full complement of the board at the next meeting. C. July 8th Tour - Feedback Board members shared their reflections on the July summer tour of Savory Gardens and the Lundgren Homes. It was unanimous that the weather couldn't have been better; and tour guides Arlene Savory and Barry/Karen Lundgren added a special touch to the evening. The board also agreed that they appreciated Council Members Josh Sprague and Joni Bennett joining the tour; and also liked the "press" received from Edina's Channel 16 crew by including the tour on the "Agenda Edina" program. D. Vision Edina Planning Workshop: Request for Participants Member Joyce Mellom volunteered to represent the HPB at the upcoming "Vision Edina" Planning Workshop scheduled for September 96 and I I th. Members Sussman, Moore, and Christiaansen thanked Ms. Mellom for her willingness to serve on the panel. E. Explore the History of Your Home: Committee Report Planner Repya showed board members a web site offered from the Minnesota Historical Society entitled "Placeography" which is a wiki where one can share the history of and stories about a house, building, farmstead, public land, neighborhood or any place to which one has a personal connection. The connection to the site is found at www.placeogral2hy.org. As with all wiki sites, the information included is not vetted for accuracy; however the site would provide a good opportunity for the public to get involved in recording information on their homes, former homes or properties of interest. As the board perused the site, they noticed the numerous postings in the cities of Minneapolis, Richfield, and the surrounding area. Ms. Repya observed that the board could easily post information on the Heritage Landmark and determined eligible properties in the City of Edina as a starting point. The board members present agreed that would be an interesting venture and one the public might take to as well. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS Thank you letters to Arlene Savory and Barry & Karen Lundgren for leading the July Summer Tour were included in the packet information. IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Several board members commented that over the past several months the HPB has received some wonderful press from the City's Communications Department on Channel 16 as well as in the City's About Town magazine. (The 2014 Heritage Award for the Arthur Erickson House, 5501 Londonderry Road was highlighted on both the Channel 16 Agenda Edina program as well as in the summer issue of About Town; and the early August program of Agenda Edina also included a wonderful piece on the July summer tour of Savory Gardens.) Members asked if 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Meeting Summary August 11, 2014 there was a way that the programs /articles could be included on the HPB web page. Planner Repya agreed to talk with the Communication Department about ways the HPB could use the footage and articles to promote their programs. X. STAFF COMMENTS - None XI. NEXT MEETING DATE X11. ADJOURNMENT September 9, 2014 September 16th - City Council Work Session 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 3 HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session 1# of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Birdman, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 50% Christiaansen, Jennifer 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Mellom, Joyce 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Moore, Bob 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Sussman, Peter 2/1/2015 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% McDermott, Connie 2/1/2016 1 1 13% O'Brien, Tim 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Weber, Ryan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Brandt, Andrew student 1 1 2 25% Johnson, Nathan student 0 0% Druckman, Joe Otness, Peter student student 0 0 #DIV /01 #DIV /0! Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. _— INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: a . MINUTES- OF THE REGUL_ AR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION July 22, 2014 7:00 PM City Hall — Community Room I. CALL TO ORDER Commissioner Arseneault called the meeting to order at 6:59pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Arseneault, Bigbee, Cashmore, Carter, Davis, Harrington,. Kennedy, Sanders, and Winnick. Staff present: City Manager Scott Neal, Staff Liaison MJ Lamon, and City Management Fellow Lindy Crawford. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Kennedy to approve the Regular Meeting Agenda. of July 22, 2014. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cashmore. Motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF June 24, 2014 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Amendments: (1) Under VI. A. Change: "'motioned" to "requested." Remove: 's from Sanders's. Add: "The Commissioners reviewed the revisions made to the Plan "beginning" on Page 31 "and the resolutions to adopt on page 37. Add: "There was not second." -Delete-"Commissioner Cashmore motioned to table this to July. Motion not carried." Add: The Plan "and resolutions" will be on the July I st City Council meeting "agenda." Add: Motion carried "to adopt the Plan and the following resolutions (insert 3 resolutions). (2) Under VI. D. Changed: "getting" to "obtaining." Add: ....at the November -film festival "or elsewhere." Winnick moved to approve the minutes as amended by the HRRC. Commissioner Davis seconded. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. A. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner "Sanders motioned to reorder the agenda to have Section VI. E. discussed first, Harrington`s'econded. Motioned carried. A. Community Conversations (Bigbee/Davis) Commissioner Bigbee handed out the most recently updated Board and Commission Working Group Roster. Bigbee will be working with this group closely and inviting others to join at a later date. Bigbee made a motion to approve the eight new applicants to the roster, Davis seconded. Motion carried. B. Special Needs Awareness Campaign (Sanders) Commissioner Sanders requested the City Council's direction before the HRRC further develops the Special Needs Awareness campaign. Commissioners suggested discussing this item at the August 4th Joint Work Session to see which direction we should take. C. Human Rights City (Kennedy) Kennedy presented a.report on Human Rights Cities. This is a possible new initiative on our 2015 Work Plan and will be discussed at the,August 4th Joint Work Session. D. Tolerance in Motion (Winnick/Bigbee) Commissioners Winnick and Bigbee attended a meeting with the Mayor and representatives from the nonprofit.group Tolerance in Motion. Materials provided in the meeting packet were discussed by the HRRC. Winnick,and Bigbee would like to bring this item to Council and see where they stand on this and see if this is something that should be put on our 2015 Work Plan. E. Joint;Work Session Preparation and Work Plan Review (Arseneault) City Manager Neal and Commissioners discussed the proposed changes in the Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan ( "Plan "). Neal brought attention to steps #1 and #7 of the Plan. The City Council will have the chance to review the Plan prior to the Joint Work Session. The word "substantiated". in step #1 of the Plan will -,be important to Council, suggested Neal.. . Commissioners discussed reordering the joint Work Session outline to ensure that the Planand.New Initiatives. are both discussed. Commissioner Davis moved discussed amendments to the Work Session outline, Winnick seconded.; Motion carried. Sanders motioned to make discussion time for everything five minutes besides the Plan, which would be about 10 minutes, Bigbee seconded. Motion carried. F. HRRC Budget History ( Lamon) Staff Liaison Lamon explained the budget history provided in the meeting packet. Limon mentioned that the HRRC may reallocate funds if Commissioners would like to in the future: We do still have some video production costs and a Tom Oye mugs invoice but we will have funds remaining for 2014. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Commissioner Bigbee mentioned there is an upcomin&Government Alliance on Race and Equity conference if anyone would like to attend. VIII. CHAIR,: COMMISSION MEMBER, AND STUDENT COMMENTS A. Next Meeting: August 26th, 2014 Student Commissioner Harrington shared that this will be her last meeting because she is leaving for college. Commissioner Bigbee motioned to fund up to three, $150 registration fees for HRRC members to attend the Government Alliance.on Race and Equity. conference August 5 -6, 2014, subject to funding availability, Commissioner Cashmore seconded. Motion carried. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Lamon noted we have two new student commissioners joining the HRRC. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Cashmore to adjourn the July.22nd meeting, Kennedy seconded. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:14pm. Respectfully submitted,_ MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison .7 Minutes approved by HRRC August 26, 2014 I Jan Seidman, HRRC Chair HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings[WorkSessions 8/412014 Arseneault, Patrice 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 100% Bigbee, Arnie 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 100% Carter, Derek 2/1 /2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Cashmore, John 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 78% Davis, Laura 2/1 /2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 89% Kennedy, Ellen 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Sanders, Tiffany 2/1 /2017 11 1 1 1 1 '1 1 7 100% Seidman, Jan 2/1/20161 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 11 1 8 89% Winnick, Steve 2/1/20161 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 89°% Haeg, Molly 9/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 67% Harrington, Paige 9/1/2014 1 1 1 3 33°% Gates, Nicole 911/2015 0 0°% Weinert, Katrina 9/1/2015 0 0% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held ION MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded ION MEMBER'S LINE1 Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. •A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting data/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. Mayor Hovland, Councilmembers: Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Ann Swenson, Josh Sprague; Mgr. Neal, Chad Milner, Ross Bintner, Dave Fisher .5509 Park Place, to the north, will be torn down and a spec home will be built. Our property sits several feet below 5509, but we are not impacted by drainage from them as they have a drainage system in their rear yard that takes the storm water to Park Place. City Engineering staff has Visited the site on June 30, 2014 and August 29, 2014. This system has: • A catch, basin measuring 30 inches at the SE corner of the house. • The drain tile runs along the south side of the house behind a block retaining wall. The catch basin and drain tile collect and divert storm water directly to Park Place. The City of Edina (Ken Rosland) required the catch basin and drain tile to be installed in 1997 to take the water to Park Place. The house was sold in 2007. In order to control the volume of water in the rear yard, the new owner found it necessaryto bury and tile: • 'Three roof drains 3" X 4" in the rear yard to the catch basin. • Sump -pump drain #1 on the SE to the catch basin. • Sump. pump #2 on the SW to Park Place • Two north roof drains to Park Place. The survey of existing site conditions does not show this drainage system nor does the.proposed storm water management plan. Engineering'staff wrote. in his August 5, 2014 Review of 5509 Park Place that: • "This drainage path (from 5509 Park Place)is through private property to the south(5513 Park Place) and then to Park Place or Dever Drive." This is NOT true. Staff has seen the site. The water at 5509 Park Place goes to Park Place and NOT into our yard. Staff emailed the Builder a copy of this Engineering review and in doing has essentially told the Builder that he can drain ihis water into our yard. Staff has granted an illegal drainage easement on our property for the benefit of the Builder with no notification or compensation to us. The proposed drainage plan will not contain and divert the water to Park Place as it currently does and as was previously mandated by the City but will direct water onto our property without our permission. We do not have a sump pump and drain tile. We cannot manage this volume of water. The new home needs to keep the catch basin and drain tile, gutters and buried roof and sump drains. Staff has told us we will not get more water than we are currently getting. We dontt,get water now. Please keep a hold on the demo permit until: • The illegal drainage easement is removed. • The proposed drainage plan shows water going to Park Place and not into our yard. • All permit requirements have been satisfied, including accurate & complete surveys Thank you. Lori & Jim Grotz - 5S13-Park`-Place September -16,-Z614- r Highlights of 5509 Park Place Existing Drainage Systems These contain water on 5509 property site. Systems below were pointed out to staff during staff site visits. Staff instead states in Drainage Memo (Page 1) "This drainage path is through private property to the south and then to Park Place or Dever Drive." In the Drainage Memo staff has granted an Illegal Drainage Easement through our property; By Telling The Builder Where He Can Drain His Storm Water (from 5509 Park Place to 5513 Park Place). DATE: August 5, 2014 TO: David Fisher — Building Official CC: Chad Milner — City Engineer Permit Applicant FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 5509 Park Place - Permit 133045 The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and adherence to: • Chapter 10, Article 4 — Demolition Permit Stormwater and Erosion Control (10 -106 to 10 -1 13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345) • Chapter 10 Article 17 — Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10 -710) • Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2 — Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 — Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) I. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: www.minnehahacreel<.org/ 2. Site survey should follow the standard described in policy SP -005 -B included in the building ep rmit application packet. Survey missing the following: a. #10.4 Lowest point of entry of proposed and existing (show proposed egress window wells) b. #11-12 ESC and drainage can be shown on grading, stormwater management, or erosion control plan. 3. City Standard Plates available here: http• / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section= construction standards Street and Curb Cut 4. Application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/CiV Offices /Public Works /CurbCutAppli cation. pdf 5. Describe removal and restoration of existing driveway and curb cut. The area is within the 5 year moratorium. Sanitary and Water Utilities 6. Show utility connections. See figure below. Storm Water Utility 7. The subject site front yard drains to Park Place and is part of subwatershed MHS —I I. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited. 8. The subject site rear and side yard also drains to subwatershed MHS -1 I. This drainage path is through private property to the south and then to Park Place or Dever Drive. 9. A 4" service connection (Plate 241.310) to a 6" sump drain is available on park place at the northwest corner of the lot. Connections can be made along the line if needed. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 Mayor and members of the City Council. I have asked my documents for 5508 Dever Drive be handed to you before the start of the meeting. This presentation follows the previous one on 5509 Park Place with similar issues and concerns of granting an illegal drainage easement by City Engineering staff. This home at 5508 Dever to our East will be torn down and this home sits many feet above ours. At the time of the original land division and development, retaining walls were installed to remove the need for a steep bank between the properties. In, addition the previous owners installed elaborate retaining planters and water direction systems which either held the water or diverted it to the South to Dever Drive. All roof drains on 5508 Dever are buried and tiled. The homeowner plans to cut down his rear yard by 5 feet and has told us all retaining walls, retaining planters and retaining structures will be removed. At the present time water from 5508 does not cross into our property except at the farthest Southwest corner of 5508 near the telephone pole. Along the entire Western property line, we need a durable retaining wall with a French drain immediately to the East to prevent drainage into our yard and to direct the water South to Dever Drive. We also need gutters with all roof drains on the North and West tiled to Dever Drive. I am also concerned about City Engineering Drainage memos making statements to benefit builders that are simply not true. In the Engineering Review of 5508 Dever Drive staff states "This drainage path is through private property to the west and then to Dever Drive ". By making this statement, staff may create a civil issue between the City of Edina and us with this language in the memo. We have been told by counsel this appears to be an illegal backdoor eminent domain taking of our property rights. This takes our property rights and gives them to the builder. We were not notified, we were not compensated, if not corrected; an illegal taking of our property rights occurs. We again request these City Engineering Memos be corrected and sent to all parties. Thank You. Jim and Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 Dated Sept. 16, 2014 Highlights of 5508 Dever Drive Existing Drainage Systems These contain the water on 5508 property site. Systems below were pointed out to staff during staff site visits. Staff instead states in Drainage Memo (Page 1) "This drainage path is through private property to the west and then to Dever Drive. " In the Drainage Memo staff has granted an Illegal Drainage Easement through our property; By Telling The Builder Where He Can Drain His Storm Water (from 5508 Dever Drive to 5513 Park Place). f DATE: June 13, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Chad Milner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 5508 Dever Drive — Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control for general adherence to the following ordinance sections: • Chapter 10, Article 4 — Demolition Permit Stormwater and Erosion Control (10 -106 to 10 -1 13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345) • Chapter 10 Article 17 — Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10 -710) • Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2 — Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 — Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department and assumes the attached documents were submitted for building permit review. A more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. I. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: www,minnehahacreek.org! 2. Site survey should follow the standard described in policy SP -005 -B included in the building permit application packet. Street and Curb Cut 3. It appears application may utilize existing drive entrance. If application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http: / /edinamn.govfedinafiles /files /City Offices /Public Works /CurbCutApplication.pdf Sanitary and Water Utilities 4. Show utility connections. Storm Water Utility 5. The subject site front yard drains to Dever Drive and is part of subwatershed MHS —I I. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited. 6. The subject site rear and side yard also drains to subwatershed MHS —I 1. This drainage path is through private property to the west and then to Dever Drive. 7. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following links: https:l/maps.barr.com/edina and http: / /edinamn.ggvlindex.phpi section = engineering_ water resource 8. Required storm water and erosion control precautions are described below. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 w%vwEdlnaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371. Fax 952 -826 -0392