Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-11-03_COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 21 2014 5:35 P.M. Mayor Hovland convened the work session at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague entered the meeting at 5:37 p.m. Staff attending the meeting included: Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Tom Horwath, Forrester; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, City Engineer; Scott Neal, City Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director; and Cary Teague, Planning Director. BUSINESS MEETING Finance Director Roggeman, gave an update on the status of the 2014 Operating Budget revenues and expenditures as per the third quarter. Assistant Manager Kurt reviewed 2014 -2015 Strategic Priorities. The Council discussed the reports and gave feedback to staff. TREE ORDINANCE Joining the meeting were Planning Commissioners Claudia Carr, Susan Lee and Michael Platteter. Director Teague gave a brief presentation of the updated draft tree ordinance dated August 17, 2014. Council members and Planning Commissioners discussed various aspects of.the draft ordinance. Item of discussion included: desire for a more strongly articulated statement of purpose, should there be critical tree.. preservation plan standards, should mitigation include species and size, general tree protection standards; applicability to subdivisions, would such an ordinance apply to all "residential property, and .commercial property standards for tree preservation. The Council thanked the working group and requested that it and staff continue to work on the ordinance and bring it back to the Council with the requested changes. . There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 3, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR. OF THE- EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 21, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda as modified to consider Item VII. Community Comment as Item V.C. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent. agenda as revised to. remove Items IV.I. Release of Public Improvements and Special Assessment Agreements; IV.O. Resolution No. 2014-113 NFL Resolution; and, IV.P. Resolution No. 2014-114 Renaming Columbus Day Indigenous Peoples' Day, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular, closed session, and work session meeting minutes of October 7, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 9, 2014, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $708,091.79; Police Special Revenue $ 1 5,747.12; Pedestrian and 'Cyclist Safety $1,279.00; City Hall Debt Service $975.00; Working Capital Fund $1,116029.79; Art Center Fund $4,120.15; Aquatic Center Fund $3,847.70; Golf Course Fund $6,451.12; Ice Arena Fund $50,751.98; Sports Dome Fund $10,876.95; Edinborough Park Fund $35.00; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,028.23; Liquor Fund $273,944.06; Utility Fund $593,321.09; Storm Sewer 'fund $40,583.06; PSTF Agency Fund $12,300.79; Centennial TIF District $4,427.36; Southdale 2 District $1,230.00; Pentagon Park District $205.00; Payroll Fund $8,308:56; TOTAL $2,854,553.75 and for receipt of payment of claims dated October 16, 2014, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $185,009.02; Police Special Revenue $829.86; Arts and .Culture Fund $2,305.76; Working Capital Fund $959,587.22; Art Center Fund $2,510.46; Golf Dome Fund $305.34; Aquatic Center Fund $37.50; Golf Course Fund $32,080.49; Ice Arena Fund $165,163:78; Sports Dome Fund- _$36,281.30; Edinborough Park Fund $4,4,09.49; Centennial Lakes Park .Fund $7,662.23; Liquor Fund $168,112.03; Utility Fund $33,091.31; Storm Sewer Fund $11,292.54; Recycling Fund $35,222.57; PSTF Agency Fund $3,949.90; TOTAL $1,647,850.80; and, Credit Card Transactions dated July 28 - August 26, 2014; TOTAL $38,703.99 IV.C. Request for Purchase, Toro Procore Aerifier, Braemar Golf Course, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, MTI Distributing at $22,534.50 IV.D. Request for Purchase, One 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe 4 x 4 Reserve Vehicle - Police Department, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Ranger GM at $32,588.18 IV.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -136, approving Hennepin County Chiefs of Police Association Mutual Aid Agreement IV.F. Request for Purchase, Bathhouse Roof Replacement - Aquatic Center, awarding the, bid to the recommended low bidder, Les Jones Roofing at $27,791.00 IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -109, authorizing Master Grant Contract Agreement with Minnesota Department of Health Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21. 2014 IV.H. Amend Public Health Emergency.. Preparedness Services Agreement with Bloomington, Public Health Division Release W.I. Delese of Ptibli . improvements and Special Assessment Agree -me ..�_ IV.). Adopt Resolution -, No. 201.4-110, approving Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement IV.K. Adopt Resolution. No. 2014 -111, authorizing_ application for Hennepin County' Environmental Response Fund Grant IV.L. Authorize Community Response and Inflow /Infiltration Mitigation Work Plan IV:M. Adopt Resolution No. 2014-1,12, setting Public Improvement Hearings to be held December 9, 2014 IV.N. Approve Traffic Safety Committee, Report, August 13, 20.14 IV.O. Resolution A=n 14 1 13 NFL 1 t• Trv� -> »TrrcTCCivacivn IV.P. Reselut*e-. Ales 'fA 1 A 1 1 A Renaming Columbus Day indigenous Peeples' Day IV.Q. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -135, .approving Lot Division, 3932 and 3934 West 49th Street IV.R. Request for Purchase, Electronic Plan Review Project,. awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, SHI at $206,449.00 for the software portion and various vendors at $39,568.00 for the server and workstation upgrades . IV.S. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -133, authorizing the Fire Department to accept Department of Homeland Security/FEMA 2013 Assistance to Firefighters .Grant IV.T. Request for Purchase, Ambulance Stryker Power Loads, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Stryker EMS at $63,871.00 IV.U. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -134, Providing for the Sale of $13,485,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.1. RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS — TABLED The Council asked about the sequence and advisability of this release. Engineer Millner explained that there was a timing issue and advised the Council to table this item with the exception of the property identified as #A099 -84 -881, which had been paid in full and the lien should be released. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve release of the lien on Property #A099 -84 -881. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to table the Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements to a future date to be determined by staff. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland IV.O. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -113 APPROVING NFL RESOLUTION —NOT ADOPTED The Council discussed the letter to the National Football League that had been drafted by the Human Rights and Relations Commission for Mayor Hovland's signature. The letter related to the team name of the Washington Redskins. It was suggested the letter be returned to the Human Rights and Relations Commission for redrafting in legal format. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to refer the letter to the Human Rights and Relations Commission for redrafting in legal format. Following Council discussion as to whether or not this topic was within its purview, Member Swenson withdrew her motion. Page 2 Member Swenson made a motion, seconded NFL Resolution. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 by Member Brindle to,take no action on the IV.P. RESOLUTION. NO. 2014 -114 RENAMING COLUMBUS DAY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' DAY — TABLED The Council acknowledged that the community had not had an opportunity to offer an opinion on this matter and suggested referring the topic to Speak Up Edina to allow the community to express its opinion. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to table Resolution No. 2014-114 and refer the topic to Speak Up Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland , Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. BEYOND THE YELLOW RIBBON PRESENTATION — RECEIVED Member Brindle described the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon organization and introduced the presenters. Heather Shue shared that the Southwest Twin Cities Beyond the Yellow Ribbon branch was celebrating its one -year anniversary and were working to build awareness. Jocelyn Northenscold thanked the Council and community for their involvement and announced an upcoming social networking event at the St. Louis Park American Legion. She also shared that a benefit fundraiser was being planned for the summer of 2015. V.B. SEPTEMBER SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — TOPIC: COMMUNITY EVENTS Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of September opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to Community Events. V.C. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on.file. VI.A. FIRST READING FOR FINAL REZONING FROM POD -I TO PUD AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ORDINANCE 'AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING THE PUD DISTRICT, :;BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE, 3330 WEST 66TH STREET — FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -17 GRANTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague explained that the City Council was asked to consider final rezoning for a redevelopment request of the existing TCF Bank building, located at 3330 66th Street, by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. The applicant was proposing to remodel and expand the building into _39 .studio .apartments for _young adults who_ have experienced homelessness. _ .This proposal was the second of the two -step review process. The staff and Planning Commission recommend approval. Proponent Presentation Lee Blons, Executive Director of Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, thanked the Council for its support thus far and asked for its further support by voting in favor of the proposal tonight. Bart Nelson, architect, presented the materials board and answered questions of the Council concerning the different materials and where they would be used. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. Public Testimony Robert Long, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, addressed the Council. Mike Minor, 6519 Barrie Road, addressed the Council. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21,2014 Erik Scheurle, 2007 61St Street West, addressed the Council Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public — hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Attorney Knutson addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating that the Council was not adopting the ordinance tonight, but instead granting first reading. He advised there were no legal issues approving first reading tonight. Mr. Teague addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating that the deadline for City Council action was October 22, 2014, but an extension had been granted from Beacon through November 19, 2014. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2014 -17, amending the Zoning Ordinance to Establish the PUD -7, Planned Unit Development -7 District at 3330 66th Street. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD -2 TO PUD AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FRAUENSHUH COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE GROUP, 7700 FRANCE AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -116 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the proposal from Frauenshuh Companies to develop the northeast corner of 7700 France Avenue with a free standing, 7,000 square foot seafood restaurant. The restaurant would be designed for up to 242 people and provide 63 dedicated parking spaces in addition to the shared parking with the office building. The primary issue was that a freestanding restaurant was not a permitted use in the Planned Office District -2 zoning district but a .restaurant is allowed in POD -2 as an accessory ,use within an office building. Both the. Planning Commission and City Council suggested that Planned Unit Development rezoning was the best way to approach the use on the site. The preliminary.review was the first step of a two_ -step process of City review and both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval. Proponent Presentation Steve Faber, Frauenshuh, shared the lay out of the restaurant, reviewed the materials, and discussed connectivity with sidewalk and main office building. Alan Ackerberg, .Parasole, shared that the company had four restaurants in Edina and that it would be a mid - priced seafood restaurant. Mr. Teague answered the Council's question relating to a bus stop indicating that staff would determine whether there was a bus stop at that location. Mr. Faber agreed that if there was a bus stop, the sidewalk would continue to France Avenue. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made, 'a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21. 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland M.Motion carried. The 'Council discussed sustainability and making the sidewalk and restaurant access more pedestrian friendly. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014-116, approving Preliminary Rezoning from POD -2, Planned Office District -2, to PUD, Planned Unit-Development and Preliminary Development Plan for 7700 France Avenue, subject. to the following conditions: I. The Final Development Plans must be generally_ consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated September 8, 2014. 2. The Final Site Plan must include a boulevard style sidewalk along France and sidewalk connections from the existing building to the restaurant and from the boulevard sidewalk to the building. 3. The..Landscape Plan should be revised to show the specific trees that would be removed, and consider additional planting and /or saving trees along ,the north lot line to provide e � screning of the loading area.. . 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all ,minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the Zoning Ordinance. S. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated'.October 1, 2014. 7. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 8. Bike racks must be located on the site near main entrances. 9. Building shall be 4 -sided architecture with all finishes consistent and complimentary. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CHAD AND JENNIFER HELMER, 5808 CREEK VALLEY ROAD — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -117 ADOPTED, Assistant Planner- Presentation Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request for a Conditional Use Permit at 5808 Creek Valley Road to allow the.first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than -one foot. The applicant was proposing to tear down and re'build.on the property and to raise the first floor elevation 1.5 feet above the existing first floor elevation to conform to the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood elevations and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's approval for anew basement elevation_ with_ a corresponding ceiling height.of slightly-over 8_feet. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval on October 8, 2014. Mr. Millner answered questions from the Council, indicating that the basement was rising, but the grade was changing minimally. Two rain gardens would address the increased volume. from the roof and the flow would continue to drain towards the back of the home and the ibackyard rear let line t� Proponent Presentation Steve Schwieters, Wooddale Builders, answered questions of the Council concerning storm water treatment. He explained that Wooddale had hired Hedlund Engineering to help meet all the requirements of the City and that all down spouts would be catch basined into specific areas. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:49 p.m. Public Testimony Carol Deming, 7027 McCauley Trail South, addressed the Council. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council addressed the issue raised during public testimony, indicating that the Council does not have control over home design. The Council had previously considered design review, but had recognized that home design was so varied within most Edina neighborhoods that neighborhood character would not be preserved by restriction of housing style. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014-117, approving a Conditional Use Permit at 5808 Creek Valley Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed' and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped September 23, 2014. • Building plans and elevations date stamped September 23, 2014. 2. Compliance with the .conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo dated October 1, 2014. 3. Gutters and 'downspouts shall be required and direction of drainage flow shall be approved by the City Engineer. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Mr. Millner reviewed the City policy for special assessments and explained Chapter 429 of Minnesota State Statutes granted the City the ability to assess for improvements. Assessable costs include the following: direct construction costs; construction finance costs; City and contracted engineering costs; scientific and technical consulting costs; printing and mailing; and legal and other project related costs. The options for payback include: pay entire balance prior to certification, partial pay prior to certification (25% minimum), pay entire balance over 15 years after certification, or assessment deferral for certain age and income requirements.. The assessment interest rate would be 1% higher than the estimated net interest rate of the bonds to be issued for the project. VI.D.1. AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -14 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -118 ADOPTED Water Resources Coordinator Adler presented the assessment roll for City- administered aquatic weed control service upon request by homeowners. She displayed a map of the areas of improvement for Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond, and presented the assessment rolls: 36 Arrowhead Lake residents ' to be assessed $276.11 per house, 33 Indianhead Lake residents to be assessed $270.67 per house and, 63 Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond properties. to be assessed $245.04 per house. The Council expressed concern over the amount of water lilies in the Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond and the cost increase. Ms. Adler answered that the Department of Natural Resources would only allow a 15 -foot channel through the middle of the pond. She.also shared that the cost `increase was due to several factors. Last year, the City took a larger portion of the cost. This year there was only one bidder for the project and there was an increased amount of staff time. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. Public Testimony Becky Briggs, 4509.Browndale Avenue, addressed the Council. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. N Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Ms. Adler addressed the issue raised during public testimony, indicating that the properties included in each area were the same as in years past and she was unsure of the process that determined which properties were included. The Council discussed removal of properties that did not have water frontage and determined to address that issue the following year. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014-118 Levying Special Assessment for Public Improvements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.2. WEED MOWING IMPROVEMENT NO. WD -14 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -119 ADOPTED Public Works Director Olson reviewed the Code requirement for maintenance of vegetation and the process, used to notify the property owner to comply. If compliance was not gained, the weeds were cut by Park Maintenance staff and the cost assessed. Mr. Olson presented, the assessment roll for 16 properties that would be certified to the County Assessor for collection in addition to an administrative fee. He indicated that there had been one appeal from 5222 Green Farms Road, but Staff recommended moving forward with all 16 properties. Mr. Olson answered questions from the Council concerning proper documentation for 5,222 Green Farms Road. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:16 p.m. Public Testimony Tim Consolovik, joint owner with Ellen Cohen of 5222 Green Farms Road, addressed the Council. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Olson and Attorney Knutson answered questions of the Council concerning 5,222 Green Farms Road and the appeal process. Mr. Knutson explained to the Council that the assessment could move forward tonight and the appeal should go through the District Court if the property owner desired to do so. The Council suggested that Mr. Olson meet with the property owner to discuss the appeal and provide the documentation. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014-119 Levying Special Assessments for. Improvement No. WD -14 Weed Mowing. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Manager Neal explained the assessment process was very strict and because staff followed proper process, recommended the Council continue with the assessment for all 16 properties. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.3. TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -14 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 420 ADOPTED Mr. Olson presented Code Section 1055 that called for the removal of diseased trees and described the process to identify diseased trees, property owner notification, and options for removal. Mr. Olson presented the assessment roll for eight properties at a total cost $16,931.29. The total includes a $30.00 per property administration fee. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -120 Levying Special Assessment for Improvement No. TR -14 Tree Removal. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.4. 50TH & FRANCE MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -14 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014- 121 ADOPTED Mr. Olson presented the,-,assessment roll for 22 properties within the 500 and France maintenance area. He explained that the methodology for assessing the maintenance expenses for the 50th and France business district had changed because of significant discussion at the June 3, 2014, work session. There was also a concerted effort from the assessing department to measure the assessable area for each business. This resulted in an increase to the assessable area to 416,768 square feet. Because of these changes, the 50th and France maintenance assessment changed from $0.6848 in 2013 to $0.5885 in 2.014. Mr. Olson shared that one property owner, 5034 France Avenue, had obie� cte t e�essed concern over the new methodology and assessment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:35 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -121 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Brindle: seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett left the Council dais. VI.D.S. GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. G -14 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -122 ADOPTED Mr. Olson presented the assessment roll for 24 properties within the Grandview Business District to be assessed at $0.163 per square foot, an increase from 2013. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:38 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -122 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett returned to the Council dais. VI.D.6. MENDELSSOHN A NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -393 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -123 ADOPTED Mr. Millner presented a map of the area and the total project cost (including utilities) of $ 1',253,104.43. The City's contribution towards utility costs was $600,1106.60 (48% of the total project). The assessment cost was $652,997.83 or $10,097.90 per Resident Equivalent Unit, which was a 37% reduction from the estimated assessment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. Public Testimonv Mary McDonald, 6216 Belmore Lane, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Millner addressed the issue raised during public testimony, indicating staff was working with property owners when there were issues with hydro- seeding. He stated that many properties with issues had been touched up;. but the complaint during public testimony was from a property that had refused the touch up. The. Council, discussed the very poor quality soil in areas concerned and that it contained rocks and debris from previous roadwork. Member Swenson introduced and, moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -123 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements, with the request that staff address the properties that have complained about soil and determine if those properties require new topsoil. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.7. NORMANDALE NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -394 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -124 ADOPTED Mr. Millner presented a map of the area and the total project cost (including utilities) of $2,043,338.86. The City's contribution towards utility costs was $1,062,088.54 (52% of the total project). The assessment cost was $981,250.32 or $11,025.28 per Resident Equivalent Unit, which was a 10% reduction from the estimated assessment. Some homeowners took advantage of the opportunity to fund their sanitary sewer service and water service replacements through special assessments and those assessments were reflected on each Final Assessment Roll. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:49 p.m. Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -124 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. D.8. BRAEMAR HILLS B NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA- 39S — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -12S ADOPTED Mr. Millner presented a map of the area and the total project cost_ (including utilities) of $779,242.67. The City's contribution towards utility costs was $430,744.93 (54% of the total project). The assessment cost was $277,572.09 or $8,085.41 per Resident Equivalent Unit, which was a 13% reduction from the estimated assessment. The project also included funding from the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund in the amount of $70,925.65. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:51 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -125 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.9. BRAEMAR HILLS B NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION, ST., PATRICKS LANE, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -396 - RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -126 ADOPTED Mr. Millner presented a map of the area. The assessment cost was $125,503.54 or $8,715.52 per Resident Equivalent Unit, which was a 20% reduction from the estimated assessment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9 :52 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -126 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Page 10 P Minutes /Edina City Council /October.21, 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.10. BRAEMAR HILLS B NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION, GLEASON CIRCLE, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -397 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -127 ADOPTED Mr. Millner presented a map of the area. The assessment cost was $67,135.60 or $9,159.02 per Resident Equivalent -Unit, which was a 21 % reduction from the estimated assessment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:54 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -127 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D.11. LAKE EDINA A NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -398 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -128 ADOPTED Member Sprague stated that he was representing a seller in this neighborhood and asked Attorney- Knutson if that constituted a conflict of interest. Attorney Knutson responded that it did not. Member Sprague stated that he was choosing to recuse himself and left the Council Chambers. Mr. Millner presented a map of the area and the total project cost (including utilities) of $3,447,802.44. The City's contribution towards utility costs was $1,723,439.96 (50% of the total project). The assessment cost was $1,724,362.48 or $6,969.94 per Resident Equivalent Unit, which was a 44% reduction from the estimated assessment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:56 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to _close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Abstain: Sprague - Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -128 Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Abstain: 'Sprague Motion carried. Member Sprague returned to the Council Chambers. VI.E. CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES IMPROVEMENT NO. DU -14 - RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -129 ADOPTED Page I I Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Finance Director Presentation Finance Director Roggeman explained that Minnesota Statute 444.075 allows cities to "charge a charge against the owner, lessee, occupant or all of them and might provide and covenant for certifying unpaid charges to the county auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes were. collected," City of Edina City Code section 28 also allows for the certification of water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling delinquent accounts. Hennepin County requires Council resolution prior to certification. Utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent over 30 days were notified in writing of the pending certification. Customers who have not paid by October 21, 2014 would be charged a $20 administrative fee. Customers had the opportunity to pay until November 14, 2014. The Council discussed two accounts that seemed to be using the City as a 'bank.' It was noted the City had tightened up the policy previously because one of these accounts continuedto carry a large balance. Tke',Council speculated that it had sent a message that commercial accounts could get away with carrying a large balance. Manager Neal stated staff would draft a stronger policy for the Council's review. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:05 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -129, authorizing the Certification of Delinquent Utility Charges to the Hennepin County Auditor. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.F. CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. AB -14 - RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -130 ADOPTED Community Health Administrator Presentation Community. Health Administrator Brown reported that due to the lack of response by the property owner at 5609 Beard Avenue South, City staff arranged to abate public health nuisance conditions at the property in order to comply with City Code. The total cost to the City was $2,844.68. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:08 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -130, Levying Special Assessments for Abatement of Public Health Nuisance. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion: carried. Page 12 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21. 201'4 VI.G: VALLEY VIEW ROAD RECONSTRUCTION FROM MCCAULEY TRAIL TO'MARK TERRACE DRIVE IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -377 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -131, ADOPTED City Engineer Presentation Mr. Millner reported that this item was being considered because a variance request needed to be filed with the Minnesota Department of Transportation in December. Staff wanted to ensure that it was completed in a timely manner.so that bids were not lost. It was noted there were two separate motions per State Statute. The assessment portion of the project required a super majority approval from the Council (4:1) and the pedestrian and cyclist safety components required a simple majority approval from the Council (3:2). Mr. Knutson stated that if the Council voted 4:1 or greater for Resolution No. 2014 -131 this would not be an issue. If it was a majority approval, the Council could move on Resolution No. 2014 -131 with an amendment for the separate portions. Mr. Millner continued that in 2004, the City received a petition for a sidewalk and in 2010, the City planned for reconstruction. However, the City ran into funding issues and was not able to go ahead with construction. The pavement was in poor condition with a Pavement Condition Index between 10 and 20. There were no curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bike facilities, or parking lanes. The residents were sent a questionnaire, invited to an open house, and then sent a follow -up questionnaire. The proposed improvements included bituminous pavement installation, curb and gutter with five -foot integrated bike lanes, sidewalk on south side with three -foot boulevard, and coach lantern street light installation. There would also be a roundabout at the Valley View Road and Braemar. Road intersection. The utility improvements included spot sanitary sewer trunk pipe repairs and CIPP, fire hydrants and gate valves, new water services, increased storm sewer system on Valley View Road, and extension of storm sewer to Sally Lane. The total project cost was $2,257,000.00. It was noted that 20% of the roadway cost would be assessed to residents at $227,400.00. Mr. Millner answered questions of the Council, indicating that it was not feasible to complete a sidewalk on the north side because costs would be 20 to 30% higher. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:28 p.m. Public Testimony Robert Tolles, 7143 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Douglas Benner, 7025 Sally Lane, addressed the Council Larry Nesbitt, 7132 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Patrick Cronan, 7146 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Susan Konezny, 7120 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Kari Jakobe, 7149 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Nicholas Jakobe, 7149 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Millner addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating that there would not be any tree removal for residential property owners. He discussed pushing the sidewalk to the curb instead of having a boulevard and stated it was a viable option, but staff preferred the boulevard for safety and aesthetics. It Page 13 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21,2014 ' was noted the residents on Valley View Road would not lose parking if bike lanes were installed because parking was illegal on the street. The lighting would be downward facing and minimally intrusive to residents. Mr. Mil_lner indicated that property values tend to increase instead of decrease when sidewalks so were added. The Council discussed the project and stated its support for the project. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -131, ordering Improvement No. BA -277 for Valley View Road Reconstruction (McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive). Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. ' COMMUNITY COMMENT This item was considered as item V.C. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS V,III.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014432 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS. AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of .Resolution No. 2014 -132 accepting various grants and donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. i VIII.B. FRED RICHARDS VISION PLAN — APPROVED Manager Neal reported that earlier this year, staff recommended closing Fred Richards course and initiating a repurposing project that began with soliciting community opinions. Staff later recommended hiring Schoenbauer Consulting. Jeff Schoenbauer, Schoenbauer Consulting, shared that this step was the beginning of the creative process and not the end. Mr. Schoenbauer explained that the process had four steps including: 1) create a set of principles and vision for the site (current step); 2) prepare a detailed master plan for the site consistent with the vision and City Council direction; 3) develop a funding package; and 4) prepare construction documents, bid project, and undertake construction. It was noted that the Parkway corridor would ensure ease of access to the park from the south, allow for shared use of parking lots, and create an appealing buffer between the park and future development. The park would be split into 60% active and 40% passive play areas. Parks and Recreation Director Ann Kattreh shared the goals for the project: a public engagement process, recommendation from the Park Board to be consistent with the Council's park design parameters, to serve as basis for preparation of a master plan, and to include an estimated development budget. The survey conducted indicated that the park system needs: walking and biking trails; nature trails; natural areas and wildlife habitats; picnic areas; and, indoor fitness and exercise facilities. The next step in the process was to complete a park system strategic plan by June 2015. Mr. Schoenbauer and Ms. Kattreh answered questions of the Council relating to how the percentages were determined, parking availability, and the quality of the soil. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the Fred Richards vision plan. The Council discussed whether the drawing included in the vision plan was appropriate fo`r the vision stage of the project. The Council was concerned that the vision should only lay out principles. Mr. Page 14 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 21, 2014 Schoenbauer explained that the drawing was just a starting point, but the project would continue to evolve. Ms. Kattreh added that the drawing was a useful tool with residents as it gave a visual of the possibilities going forwards. The Council thanked'Mr. Schoenbauer and Ms. Kattreh for their hard work. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. PARK BOARD WORK SESSIONS AND REGULAR MEETING, AUGUST 11, 2014 .2. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 3. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE - Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS - Received XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS - Received X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 4, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 21, 2014, meeting available.' Page 15 R55CKR2 _jlS101 CITY L.. .jINA 10/2- - 1413:45:00' j Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description Business Unit 428 10123/2014 YORK SELLING 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 433 10123/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,271.42 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 355162 21409114 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 355299 45208300 3,271.42 987.80 355300 45208400 5842.5512 67.50 429 10/23/2014 45208600 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 22.50 355367 45309900 5842.5515 2,218.52 87.20 45310000 355297 1834754 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 111.71 64.00 355303 355296 1834755 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 90954800 5842.6406 98.40 355363 1837623 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 249.60 434 ,1012312014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 31.10 430 10/23/2014 OE- 371254 -1 100676 ALL SAFEjINC. 17.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355406 OE- 371254 -2 1628.6513 63.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 99.86 EXTINGUISHER, BRACKET 355468 132813 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 99.86 431 10/23/2014 103680 ARAMARK1 REFRESHMENT SRVCS 146.66 COFFEE 355470 9791621 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 146.66 432 10/2312014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 4,899.00 STORMWATER MGMT 355210 23270354.00 -209 5960.6103 2,213.00 WATER QUALITY MGMT 355209 ,23271398.00 -1 5924.6103 7,112.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 433 10123/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 32.76 355435 44707600. 5822.5513 760.20 355299 45208300 5842.5513 987.80 355300 45208400 5842.5512 67.50 355301 45208600 5842.5515 22.50 355367 45309900 5842.5515 2,218.52 355365 45310000 5842.5512 182.08 355304 90920300 5842.5515 111.71 355303 90954700 5842.5515 7.24 355302 90954800 5842.6406 195.14 355366 90988300 5842.5515 4,585.45 434 ,1012312014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 31.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355407 OE- 371254 -1 1628.6513 17.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355406 OE- 371254 -2 1628.6513 63.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355166 WO- 965670 -1 1550.6406 112.03 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/201201413:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 - Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Poi Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 434 10/2312014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 435 10123/2014 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 10.00 BOLT 00001868 355429 S88620 - 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10.00 ' 436 10/23/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 3,013.50 TRUNK SEWER REHAB 355213 0170406 03485.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TRUNK SS LINING 1,992.00 EDINBOROUGH PK IMPROVEMENTS 355214 0170444- 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5,005.50 437 10/23/2014 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 100.00 WARRANTY DEDUCTIBLE 355167 190828 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 148.72 FILTERS 00005757 355215 898774 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 248.72 438 10/23/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC -- 380.75 MATERIALS TESTING 355216 B010238 01411.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 380.75 439 10/23/2014 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 15,281.18 LEGAL COUNSEL 355168 093014 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 15,281.18 440 10123/2014 104020 DALCO 290.00 TOWELS, WIPES 00001878 355223 2802927 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 116.34 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 00001878 355411 2804501 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 408.34 441 10/2312014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,412.36 355308 773925 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,225.90 355438 773926 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 46.10 355439 773927 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,684.36 442 10/23/2014 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 71.44 BAKERY 355480 526722 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 41.94 355481 526857 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 39.41 355482 527341 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 152.79 R55CKR2 L. iS101 CITY O, _-ANA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 . -Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 443 10/2312014 129718 DREW S CONCESSIONS LLC Continued... 288.00 CARAMEL CORN 355170 1772 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.00 444 10/23/2014 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 355225 2463974 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 445 10123/2014 131734 HORWITZ INC. 11,357.96 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355349 HJ014483 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 11,357.96 446 10123/2014 121076 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 213.62 TOILET SERVICE 355490 82619 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 106.87 TOILET SERVICE 355489 82620 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 40.46 TOILET RENTAL 355418 82721 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 51.50 TOILET RENTAL 355417 82722 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 412.45 447 '10/23/2014 101483 MENARDS 9.84 STANLEY SORTMASTER 00001927 355422 69425 1646.6556 TOOLS 45.82 SOLENOIDS 00001930 355278 69509. 5912.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 265.86 LUMBER, BOLTS 00001933 355421 69554 1646.6577 LUMBER 65.22 LUMBER 355420 69558 1646.6577 LUMBER 10.68 CONCRETE MIX, BRUSH 00001936 355497 69634 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 396.82 448 10/23/2014 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 740.00 INSTALL ICE VENT 355240 2025 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 660.00 INSTALL ICE VENT 355241 2026 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,400.00 449 10/23/2014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 3,760.18 TIRES, WHEEL 00005577 355243 210138896 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 2,289.00 TIRES 00005577 355244 210138902 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 6,049.18 460 10123/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 284.42 LINERS, HAND WIPES, 00007501 355186 7165 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 728.90 WIPES, BOWL CLEANER, CASTERS 00008091 355185 -7173 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 471.98 TOWELS, MOPHEADSI LINERS 355247 7208 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10/20i'6'_',413:45:00 Page- 3 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ENVIRONMENT SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE WELL HOUSES BUILDING MAINTENANCE - BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR ' ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR( EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CITY OF EDINA 10/20/201413:45:00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/2312014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No ; Subledger Account Description Business Unit 450 10/23/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Continued... 1,437.30 BIRTHDAY SUPPLIES 355246 7252 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,922.60 451 10/2312014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 305.00 VALVE CERTIFICATION 355505 16923 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 305.00 452 10/23/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 107.50 BUSINESS CARDS 355248 83301 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 107.50 •• 453 10/23/2014 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 34.34 LUMBER 00001888 355285 41247244 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 4.51 LUMBER 00001873 355428 41247245 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 38.85 454 10/23/2014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 1,234.10 DRINKING FOUNTAIN 355250 S2969268.002 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 1,234.10 455 10/23/2014 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 650.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 355512 677710 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 650.00 456 10/23/2014 - 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 39.50 WIPER BLADE 00005620 355191 4724679 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 139.37 FILTERS, GASKETS 00005688 355192 4758957 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.55 HEADLIGHTS 355251 4769262 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 139.00 SWITCH 00005693 355193 4789255 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 441.42 457 10/23/2014 119454 VINOCOPIA 118.75 355460 0108991 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 892.00 355461 0108992 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,010.75 458 10/23/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 539.64 CONCESSION PRODUCT 355198 40652422 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 539.64 R55CKR2 L- -IS101 CITY G. _MINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 459 10/23/2014 101033' WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 541.20 355331 374515 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,119.80 355462 374645 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,661.00 387658 10/23/2014 125153 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 33,839.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355352 340463 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 33,839.00 387659 10/23/2014 100613 AAA 845.18 PLATES FOR NEW TRAILER 355467 101414 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 845.18 387660 10/23/2014 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 215.00 SAFE DRIVING CLASS 355402 101714 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 215.00 387661 10/23/2014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 197.45 COFFEE 355403 155890 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 197.45 387662 10/23/2014 100665 AMSAN 2.27 ADAPTER 00001801 355469 320806045 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 9.25- CREDIT 355405 320903966 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 25.00 WANDS 00001801 355404 320903974 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 18.02 387663 10123/2014 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 812.59 PAPER 355257 10413866 -00 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 812.59 387664 10/2312014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,169.00 355298 3000572 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 626.45 355364 3001421 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,795.45 387665 10123/2014 102603 BAGS & BOWS 327.51 BOXES, TISSUE 00009367 355258 0002203363 5120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 327.51 - 387666 10123/2014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 10/2u.-- A13:45:00 Page- 5 Business Unit TUKI, AtLLINU VERNON SELLING SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 . Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387666 10/23/2014 102195 BATTERIES PLUS Continued... 209.98 BATTERIES 00005762 355471 016- 346961 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 74.04 BATTERIES 00003090 355211 018- 352110 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 284.02 387667 10/23/2014 101343 BEHR, JASON 63.55 FUEL FOR BEARCAT TRAINING 355259 101314 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 63.55 387668 10/23/2014 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,182.39 SEPT 2014 SERVICE 355472 143443 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE 1,182.39 387669 10/23/2014 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 27.00 REIMBURSEMENT 355163 101314 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 31.74 REIMBURSEMENT 355163 101314 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 58.74 387670 10/2312014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 224.00 PIZZA 355164 D281N2702 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.00 PIZZA 355212 D281N2731 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 512.00 387671 10/2312014 126139 BERNICK'S 228.80 355165 166706 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20.00 355436 170069 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 528.90 355437 170070 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 777.70 387672 10/23/2014 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,890.02 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003839 355473 81572065 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 15.90 00003839 355474 81573550 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 7.95 00003839 355475 81575113 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 1,913.87 387673 1012312014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 665.00 355368 122630 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 665.00 387674 10/23/2014 134514 BRADLEY, JON 108.00 MODEL 355476 101714 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 6 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY COMMUNICATIONS SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ARENA CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LUUIS101 CITY G, —,iNA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387674 10/2312014 134514 BRADLEY, JON Continued... 108.00 387676 1012312014 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 10 /2ui _ ..413:45:00 Page - 7 Business Unit 69.52 PHOTOS 355408 2029 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 132.26 PHOTOS 355408 2029 1130.6123 MAGAZINEMEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 319.80 PHOTOS 355408 2029 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 70.62 PHOTOS 355408 2029 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 70.62 PHOTOS 355408 2029 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 70.62 PHOTOS 355408 2029 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON SELLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS S112 INDUSTRIAL PARK SIDEWALK 258.Uo 733.44 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 258.00 387676 10/23/2014 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC. 387681 10/23/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,100.00 LCD MONITOR, LAM VIEW 00001865 355217 202288 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 29.50 1,100.00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,113.20 387677 10/23/2014 134947 BUFFALO WILD WINGS 387682 10123/2014 102496 CEMSTONE CONTRACTOR SUPPLY a_ 126.94 REFUND 355477 101714 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE 247.46 126.94 387678 10/23/2014 121408 BURK, VERA 53.75 BUILDING TOUR CANCELED 355396 101314 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 53.75 387679 10/2312014 130817 C.R. FISCHER AND SONS INC. 6,233.10 FINAL PAYMENT 355218 101014 07112.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 6,233.10 387680 10/23/2014 120641 CANNON RIVER WINERY TRAFFIC SIGNALS ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS S112 INDUSTRIAL PARK SIDEWALK 258.Uo 355305 7091 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 258.00 387681 10/23/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 6,083.70 355306 427606 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 29.50 355307 431698 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,113.20 387682 10123/2014 102496 CEMSTONE CONTRACTOR SUPPLY a_ 247.46 JOINTS, UTILITY MORTAR, GLOVES 00001863 355219 P1373850 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 247.46 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA _ 10/20/201413:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # ..,Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387683 10/23/2014 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. Continued... 899.55 355260 2923212 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 85.10 355261 2923522 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 984.65 387684 10/23/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 59.26 952 835 -1161 355201 1161 -10/14 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 156.37 952 285 -2951 355409 2951 -10/14 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 207.27 952 835 -6661 355202 6661 -10/14 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 422.90 387686 10123/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 49,669.50 JOINT POWERS 355262 61178 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 49,669.50 387686 10/2312014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 640.52 00082050- 0200650009 355264 200650009 -10114 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 1,833.40 00082050- 0200650018 355263 200650018 -10/14 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 76.78 00102561 - 0200862003 355265 200862003 -10/14 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 89.20 00102561 - 0203163003 355266 203163003 -10/14 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 170.13 00114667 - 0210000012 355478 210000012 -10/14 4090.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,810.03 387687 10123/2014 120433" COMCAST 9.03 8772 10 614 0161120, 355169 161120 -9/14 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 24.83 355410 23973 -10/14 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 33.86 387688 10/2312014 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 184.34 CONCRETE PLANT INSPECTIONS 355220 P00003622 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR ' 184.34 387689 10123/2014 121400 CONTRACTORS & SURVEYORS SUPPLY 93.50 STAKES, STAKE DRIVER 00002635 355267 B771 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 93.50 387690 10/2312014 134660 CRAWFORD, LINDY 54.77 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 355221 101414 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 54.77 387691 10/23/2014 133376 CURTIS, SARA R55CKR2 L%.;-.6101 CITY 0, —NA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387691 10/23/2014 133376 CURTIS, SARA Continued... 53.75 BUILDING TOUR CANCELED 355397 101314 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 10/20,'--.-#13:45:00 Page- 9 OaNjun %A 1 JLM]40 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERALSUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. REPAIRRARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.Z5 387692 10123/2014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,504.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 355222 3025015 5710.6230, 1,504.00 387693 10/23/2014 118189 DEM -CON COMPANIES 4.56 SOLID WASTE MGMT TAX 355479 02- 00567402 1646.6406 4.56 387694 10/23/2014 134946 DOMINO, CARRIE 62.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 355412 101714 1170.6107 62.16 387695 10123/2014 133284 EAGLE POINT CORPORATION 355.10 PINNACLE SOFTWARE 00002637 355224 0269134 -IN 1261.6406 355.10 387696 10/23/2014 122079 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES 175.00 STADIUM FOR K9 TRIALS 355413 1314 -3938 1400.6104 175.00 387697 10/2312014 130869 EISLER, SYLVIA 53.75 BUILDING TOUR,CANCELED 355398 101314 1628.4392.07 53.75 387698 10/23/2014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. .963.09 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003708 355268 1682895 1470.6510 963.09 387699 10/23/2014 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 167.50 355309 259 -1767 5862.5515 502.50 355369 259 -1818 5842.5515 670.00 387700 10/23/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 201.15- CREDIT 355206 1- 4549267 1553.6530 166.13- CREDIT 355205 1 -4549268 1553.6530 460.12 BATTERIES 355203 1 -4549927 1553.6530 10/20,'--.-#13:45:00 Page- 9 OaNjun %A 1 JLM]40 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERALSUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. REPAIRRARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/20/201413:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387700 10/23/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... " 79.03- CREDIT 355204 69- 153473 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150A3 PAD, ROTORS 355484-" 69- 154378 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.33 BATTERY 355483 69- 154893 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.27 ' 387701 10/23/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS • 184.06 METER CAPS 00001648 355270 0101352 -1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 3,547.16 CS PARTS 00001887 355269 0112823 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION " 3,731.22 387702 10/2312014 129600 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 54.00 355440 10124 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 54.00 387703 10/23/2014 102727 FORCE AMERICA 212.66 CHUTE MOTOR 00005755 355171 01434284 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 212.66 387704 10/2312014 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 329.14 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 355485 101314 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING.GENERAL 329.14 387706 10/23/2014 124471 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC. - 4,300.00 2014 PCI 355271 2654 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 4,300.00 387706 10/23/2014 129648 GPRS 30.00 CARRIE DOMINO 355414 REGISTRATION 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES 30.00 387707 10/23/2014 101103 GRAINGER 118.62 PAPER PLATES 00005717 355172 9559412011 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.47 SAFETY GLASSES 00005717 355172 9559412011 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 5.50 BATTERIES 00005718 355226 9560574387 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.50 BATTERIES 00005718 355226 9560574387 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 192.95 DRUM HEATER 00005785 355227 9561825507 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.10 SAFETY GLASSES 00005719 355228 9562292418 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 354.14 387708 10/23/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC R55CKR2 LUUIS101 CITY Oi _a]NA Council Check Register by..GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387708 10/23/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued... 284.50 355310 172577 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 182.25 355311 172872 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 466.75 387709 10/23/2014 129248 GROTH SEWER & WATER 1,000.00 REPLACE WATER LINE 355272 5874- 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,000.00 387710 10/23/2014 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 162.00 BLACK DIRT, SOD 355486 093014 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 351.53 BLACK DIRT, SOD 355486 093014 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 324.00 MULCH 355486 093014 5761.6540 FERTILIZER r 206.67 BLACK DIRT, SOD 355486 093014 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 1,044.20 387711 10/23/2014 132996 HAMMARGREN & MEYER P.A. 816.00 LEGAL FEES 355173 17154 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 816.00 387712 10/23/2014 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 511.97 SURVEYING SUPPLIES 00002634 355273 679597 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 511.97 387713 10/23/2014 117186 HELGREN,'ADAM 63.60 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355487 101314 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 63.60 387714 10123/2014 134941 HERSCH, ANNE 36.56 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355274 7219 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND GLOUCHESTER - 36.56 387715 10123/2014 103763 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 324.12 SOAPS, SANITIZER 00002286 355229 601331718 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 324.12 387716 10/23/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,984.00 355312 728164 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER - 1,984.00 10/26 --- 413:45:00 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING DISTRIBUTION GENERAL TURF CARE STREET RENOVATION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING DISTRIBUTION ARENA ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS YORK SELLING 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES TREES & MAINTENANCE 261.00 355313 23394 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 850.00 355314 23574 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1.111.00 - 387720 10/23/2014 129619 INGERSOLL -RAND COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1,210.00 ELEMENTS, FILTERS 00005142 CITY OF EDINA 30412910 1553.6406 1,210.00 Council Check Register by GL 387721 10/2312014 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 48.01 ROUND CHINESE FINGERS 00005503 10/23/2014 - 10/23/2014 22522 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description, 387717 1012312014 134937 HOLLAND, DEIDRA Continued... 135.00 ART CLASS REFUND 355275 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 1130.6124 135.00 387718 10/23/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 358.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 355415 101514 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 5822.5514 358.96 355315 .2273099 387719 10/23/2014 4,232.95 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 355441 2273135 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES TREES & MAINTENANCE 261.00 355313 23394 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 850.00 355314 23574 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1.111.00 - 387720 10/23/2014 129619 INGERSOLL -RAND COMPANY 1,210.00 ELEMENTS, FILTERS 00005142 355488 30412910 1553.6406 1,210.00 387721 10/2312014 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 48.01 ROUND CHINESE FINGERS 00005503 355230 22522 1262.6406 48.01 387722 10123/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 175.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 355416 JJ5491 1130.6124 175.00 387723 10/23/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 186.90- 355443 2265265 5822.5514 54.80 355315 .2273099 5862.5515 4,232.95 355441 2273135 5862.5514 80.00 355442 2273136 5862.5515 10,241.65 355370 2273141 5842.5514 133.95 355371 2273142 5842.5515 68.00 355491 2288653 5420.5514 14,624.45 387724 1012312014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 320.00 355316 1967420 5842.5513 32.00 355317 1967421 5842.5513 12.69- 355382 500131 5842.5512 11.13- 355383 500132 5842.5512 11.13- 355378 500133 5842.5512 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES WEB DEVELOPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRANSPORTATION COMMUNICATIONS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CLUB HOUSE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOLAS101 CITY Ot• __.NA - 10 /20i�. A3:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check'Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387724 10/23/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1.16 355372 5004081 5842.5512 COST OF-GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .87 355375 5004082 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING _ .87 355449 5004083 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 585.05 355446 5004084 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,738.79 355376 5004086 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,885.25 355381 5004087 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,078.36 355377 5004088 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,158.84 355380 5004089 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,381.83 355379 5004090 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,57107 355373 5004091 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.23 355374 5004092 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,569.02 355448 '5004093 586215512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,171.39 355445 5004094 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 300.81 355450 5004095 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,183.49 355444 5004096 5862.5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,321.40 355447'-5004097 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 692.14 355451 5004098 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 31.41 355452 5004099 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 38,085.03 387725 10/2312014 134946 KAISER, ALICE 53.75 BUILDING TOUR CANCELED 355399 101314 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 53.75 387726 .10/2312014 134948 KANGAS, JOHN 20.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 355492 101714 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 387727 10/23/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 81.99 UNIFORMS 00003871 355276 257483 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 263.96 00003865 355277 257945 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 345.95 387728 10/23/2014 108679 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION 269,710.70 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355354 1331 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 15,608.50 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355355 1332 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 285,319.20 387729 10/23/2014 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 19,718.44 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355356 PB2 -APPL 1 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2. LOGIS101 355175 39021 1554.6230 CITY OF EDINA CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,342.00 355175 39021 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS Council Check Register by GL 355175 ' 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 39021, 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 3,861.00 355175 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 1160.6160 Check # Date Amount i Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387729 10/23/2014 39021 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,707.00 Continued... 39021 5902.6160 19,718.44 UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 28,768.00 387730 10123/2014 113212 KENDELL DOORS &,HARDWARE INC. 16.00 KEYS 355493 S1013707 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.00 387731 10/23/2014 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 313.20 OCT /NOV 2014 SERVICE 355419 100114 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 313.20 387732 10/23/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 387.60 WASHERS, CONNECTORS 00005716 355174 9302782717 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 102.17 FITTINGS, ADAPTERS, HOSE 00005787 355231 9302794078 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 285.14 SWITCHES 00005787 355494 9302795171 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 774.91 387733 10/23/2014 132752 LINCO FAB INC. 9;500.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355350: BP1 -APPL 2 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 9,500.00 387734 10/23/2014 112094 LINDHOLM, ANGELA ' 21.35 TABLECLOTHS 355232 101414 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 21.35 387735 10/2312014 132809 LOEKS, JORDAN 254.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355233 101314 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 254.99 387736 10/23/2014 100858 LOGIS 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 14 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 380.00 355175 39021 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,342.00 355175 39021 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,500.00 355175 39021 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,492.00 355175 39021, 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 3,861.00 355175 39021 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,657.00 355175 39021 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 5,829:00 355175 39021 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,707.00 355175 39021 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 28,768.00 387737 10/2312014 134949 LUTHER, CHARLES D. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY Ov —oiNA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 10/2312014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387737 10/2312014 134949 LUTHER, CHARLES D. Continued... 1,676.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND '355495 101714 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,676.00 387738 10123/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 275.02 PINS, BUSHINGS 355176 2146171 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 214.50 PINS 00005746. 355177 2146191 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 399.29 CYLINDER, FITTINGS 00005746 355178 2146234 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10.74 ARBOR SHIMS 355496 2146324 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 632.71 DIRT SHOE 00005759 355234 2146381 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,532.26 387739 10/23/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 19,563.40 UNLEADED FUEL 00005780 355236 940261 1553.6581 GASOLINE 12,302.02 DIESEL FUEL 355235 946767 1553.6581 GASOLINE 31,865.42 387740 10/23/2014 133656 MCCALUY,,'SANDRA 107.50 BUILDING TOUR CANCELED 355400 2 TICKETS 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 107.50 387741 10/23/2014 101987 MENARDS' 161.02 TOOLS, DECORATIONS 00002292 355237 53803 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 161.02 387742 10/2312014 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 41,822.55 SEPT 2014 SAC CHARGES 355179 100814 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES 41,822.55 387743 10/23/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 21.96 DAMPER ASSEMBLIES 00005687 355180 490946 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 21.96 387744 10/23/2014 124816 MF IRRIGATION SERVICES 101.46 SPRINKLER REPAIR - 5032 WINSOR 355238 20092515 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 101.46 387746 10/23/2014 134936 MID - AMERICA FESTIVALS 56.90 TICKETS 355279 101514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 56.90 10/20/2u1413:45:00 Page - 15 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 387748 10123/2014 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387746 10/23/2014 102873 MILLER, SUSAN CONTRACTED REPAIRS Continued... 621.26 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 355498 100914 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 621.26 387749 387747 10/2312014 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 16 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION 100.00 ELEVATOR ANNUAL LICENSE 355181 ALR00446271 5420.6230 . SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE DISTRIBUTION PACS IS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SENIOR CITIZENS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 159.27 MERCHANDISE 355499 964393769 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 159.27 387755 10/23/2014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 612.36 LIGHTHEADS, MOUNTS 00005784 355500 37166 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 612.36 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 387748 10123/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,325.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001892 355280 34810 . 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,325.00 387749 10/23/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 791.00 LIVING STREETS BROCHURES 355239 16374 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 791.00 387750 10123/2014 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 209,000.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355357 PACKAGE 2 -APPL 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2 209,000.00 387751 10/23/2014 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 1,036.59 PARTS 355207 14309180.9/14 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 247.92 PARTS 355207 14309180 -9/14 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,284.51 387752 10/23/2014 121409 NEHLS, LORRAINE 53.75 BUILDING TOUR CANCELED 355401 101314 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 53.75 387753 10123/2014 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC. 326,387.70 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355358 APPL4 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 326,387.70 387754 10/23/2014 104350 NIKE USA INC. DISTRIBUTION PACS IS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SENIOR CITIZENS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 159.27 MERCHANDISE 355499 964393769 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 159.27 387755 10/23/2014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 612.36 LIGHTHEADS, MOUNTS 00005784 355500 37166 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 612.36 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF -1iNA 10/20/2ui413:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387755 10/23/2014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Continued... 387756 10123/2014 102712 OFFICE OFiMN.IT SERVICES 24.69 355423 W14090645 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 24.69 355423 W14090645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 49.38 355423 W14090645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.07 355423 W14090645 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 74.07 355423 W14090645 1481.6186 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 172.83 355423 W14090645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 222.21 355423 W14090645 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING.& HOCKEY 49.38 355423 W14090645 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 24.69 355423 W14090645 5311.6168 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 98.76 355423 W14090645 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 111.10 355423 W14090645 5710.6188 TELEPHONE.. EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 111.11 355423 W14090645 5760.6188 TELEPHONE .. CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 49.38 355423 W14090645 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.07 355423 W14090645 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 74.07 355423 W14090645 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 49.38 355423 W14090645 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 260.70 355424 W14090650 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,544.58 387757 10/23/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 107.60 CHAIN AND LINKS 00005756 355242 547829 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.60 387758 10/23/2014 _ 130294 O'MALLEY CONCRETE 7,100.00 REPLACED SIDEWALK PANELS 355501 LIBRARY 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ENTRANCE 7,100.00 387759 10/2312014 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 361.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT I 355425 101514 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 361.20 387760 10/2312014 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 35.20 MERCHANDISE DISPLAY 00006353 355502 340766 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 565.92 DISPLAY RACKS 00006353 355503 340889 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 601.12 387761 10/23/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 10/2312014 CITY OF EDINA 134802 PETER MUSTY LLC 10/20/201413:45:00 355457 10,204.09 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Page - 18 10,204.09 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10123/2014 YORK SELLING ' 2683590 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 _196.82 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387761 10/2312014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,060.76 5842.5513 Continued... YORK SELLING 72.52 355321 8469439 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,960.54 355320 8470010 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.333.53 355319 8470015 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 387762 10/23/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Ann Sd 387763 10/2312014 5842.5513 134802 PETER MUSTY LLC YORK SELLING 355457 10,204.09 W & WOODDALE - PAYMENT II COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,204.09 2683588 387764 10123/2014 YORK SELLING 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2683590 5842.5513 _196.82 YORK SELLING 355385 2683591 81.16 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 355387 1,060.76 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,693.96 2683593 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,249.02 355455 2683594 5862.5513 505.16 VERNON SELLING 355456 2683595 519.82 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355453 2,483.00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,893.12 162.91 9,845.73 387766 10/23/2014 100119 PING 127.24 GOLF BAG 127.24 387766 10123/2014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 379.00 379.00 387767 10/23/2014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 54.17 POSTCARD POSTAGE 54.17 387768 10/23/2014 1100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 355182 42672401 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 355318 45408044 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 355281 249 9235.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS VERNON SELLING VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST . 355388 2683586 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355457 2683587 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355389 2683588 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355386 2683590 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355385 2683591 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 355387 2683592 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355454 2683593 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 355455 2683594 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355456 2683595 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355453 2683596 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 355504 12518279 5440.5511 355322 22486 5862.5515 355282 NEIGHBORHOOD 1120.6575 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PRINTING VERNON SELLING ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY Or c�NA 10/20lzu1413:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014= 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387768 1012312014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS Continued... 103.98 ARDEN PARK POSTCARD MAILING 355426 101614 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 103.98 387769 10/23/2014 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 36.65 ACCT 622833 355245 622833 -9/14 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 36.65 387770 10/23/2014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 211.61 BLADE SHARPENING 355183 267591 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 114.00 BLADE SHARPENING 355184 271500 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 325.61 387771 10/23/2014 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 79.43 PRESSURE SWITCH 355506 11267 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.43 387772 10/2312014 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 123.24 SAFETY BOOTS 355507 2680000001106 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 355507 2680000001106 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 298.24 387773 10/23/2014 133486 REID, JENNIFER 87.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 333111 6300 VIRGINIA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 87.88 387774 10/23/2014 134943 RESIDENTIAL RENOVATION LLC. 10.50 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355427 6304 BROOKVIEW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 10.50 387776 10123/2014 134938 RICE MICHELS & WALTHER LL_P 1,056.00 EMSRB ISSUE 355283 505240 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,056.00 387776 10/23/2014 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 81,342.67 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355353 4520009803 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 81,342.67 387777 10/23/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 593.00 SOFTENER SALT 355187 00305499 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ---� R55CKR2 LOGIS101 355509 51181 5421.6230 CITY OF EDINA GRILL 475.00 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1208509 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 523.75 355391 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 5842.5513 Check # Date. Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387777 10123/2014 355327 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Continued... 593.00 387778 10/2312014 133755 RONNING, ERIK 252.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 355284 101414 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 252.00 387779 10/23/2014 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 1,080.00 TRAINING 355508 101014 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,080.00 387780 10/23/2014 134944 SHADOW PROPERTIES LLC 181.51 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355430 5232 DUNCRAIG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND RD 181.51 387781 10/23/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 238.50 NO PET WASTE SIGNS 00001730 355431 8221 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 238.50 387782 10/23/2014 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 35.90 HOT DOG BUNS 355188 250983 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 35.90 387783 10/23/2014 132196 SMALL LOT MN 197.00 355384 1188 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 197.00 387784 10123/2014 134940 SMITH MANUFACTURING 4,244.00 DUST COLLECTOR 00002629 355286 63650 2501.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4,244.00 387785 10/23/2014 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 20 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT TRAINING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LITTER REMOVAL ARENA CONCESSIONS YORK SELLING PACS IS 475.00 REFRIGERATOR MAINTENANCE 355509 51181 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 475.00 387786 10/23/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 312.77 355390 1208509 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 523.75 355391 1212428 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,003.71 355326 1213597 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR, YORK SELLING 7,127.73 355327 1213598 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 10123/2014 127620 STREETER & ASSOCIATES CITY Or _.TINA 10/20-,1,413:45:00 2,500.00 ED127626 ESCROW REFUND 355189 5112 INDIANOLA 1495.4109 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 AVE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 387791 10123/2014 101766 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387786 10123/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 387792 Continued... 130867 SUSSMAN, PETER - 2,180.87 355323 1213599 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING AASLH 1140.6104 1,845.20 355324 1213600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,314.45 355325 1213601 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 101930 THOMAS &' SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 161.50 355392 50074048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 101417REFUND 5901.4626 26,469.98 548.10 387787 10/23/2014 134700 SPOK INC. 803.95 SEPT 2014 SERVICES 107.28 PAGERS 1400.6105 355249 X0319246J 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 107.28 387788 1012312014 102261 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 194.59 PENCILS 355510 738176 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 194.59 387789 10123/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 247.75 355328 3934 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 168.00 355393 3978 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 387790 10123/2014 127620 STREETER & ASSOCIATES 2,500.00 ED127626 ESCROW REFUND 355189 5112 INDIANOLA 1495.4109 AVE 2,500.00 387791 10123/2014 101766 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 4,062.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355351 46411 5550.1705 .4,062.00 387792 10/23/2014 130867 SUSSMAN, PETER - 121.65 MILEAGE / PARKING 355287 AASLH 1140.6104 CONFERENCE 121.65 387793 10/23/2014 101930 THOMAS &' SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 548.10 HYDRANT METER USAGE 355511 101417REFUND 5901.4626 548.10 387794 10/23/2014 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 803.95 SEPT 2014 SERVICES 355432 830457347 1400.6105 803.95 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT CONSTR. IN PROGRESS INSPECTIONS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING SALE OF WATER, DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS UTILITY REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 887794 10/2312014 102798 THOMSON REUTERS- WEST Continued... 387795 10/23/2014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,297.32 355329 852619 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 184.20 355458 853967 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,980.70 355459 653968 5862.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7,462.22 387796 1012312014 124958 THURN BECK STEEL FABRICATION INC. 49,099.80 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355359 PB2 -APPL 2 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 49,099.80 387797 10/23/2014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 498.49 ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 00008004 355190 3001324987 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 498.49 387798 10/2312014 101038 TOLL GAS &WELDING SUPPLY 92.74 WELDING GAS 00005754 355252 10047782 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 92.74 387799 1012312014 124763 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 173.28 COPIER USAGE 355513 263652075 7410.6575 PRINTING 173.28 387800 10/23/2014 122990 TOTAL ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC 201.48 FILTERS 00005784 355194 250823 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 201.48 387801 10/23/2014 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 114,142.50 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355360 APPL3 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ' 114,142.50 387802 10/23/2014 125032 UNISELECT USA 528.87 AUTO PARTS 355208 093014 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 528.87 387803 10/23/2014 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 95.94 TENNIS POST RATCHETS 00001842 355253 150 - 0011044 -01 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.94 387804 10123/2014 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 10/20/201413:45:00 Page - 22 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING r. VERNON SELLING SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKR2- LOGIS101 10/23/2014 134939 VIZIMAGE LLC CITY Or _.TINA 30.00 ART / SET -UP FEE 00003869 Council Check Register by GL 1789 1470.6103 30.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 387811 10/23/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387804 1012312014 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC Continued... 387812 5,850.00 NEW OUTDOOR SIGNAGE 00004404 - 355195 47255 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,850.00 61.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355254 101314 387805 10/23/2014 100050 USPS 387813 4,000.00 ACCT # 03620836 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP. 355196 10/14 POSTAGE 1550.6235 POSTAGE 4,000.00 134.99 VEHICLE REPAIR 355199:. 84139 387806 1012312014 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 9,969.00 INSTALL MANHOLE 00001893 355288 20867 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,827.50 STORM SEWER MAIN REPAIR 00001895 355433 20870 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,722.77 NEW MANHOLE SUPPLIES 00001894 355289 20871 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18, 519.27 387807 10/23/2014 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 10/26- � 413:45:00 Page - 23__ Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS GENERAL STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,980.00 OCT 2014 SERVICE 355197 33068 - 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENAADMINISTRATION 1,980.00 387808 10/23/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,156.48 WIRE 00001870 355514 8717983 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,156.48 387809 10123/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 383.00 355330 62568 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 387810 10/23/2014 134939 VIZIMAGE LLC 30.00 ART / SET -UP FEE 00003869 355290 1789 1470.6103 30.00 387811 10/23/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 225.78 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00005571 355515 15251555 -00 4090.6406 225.78 387812 10/23/2014 101932 VOTH, BART 61.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355254 101314 5913.6201 61.97 387813 10/23/2014 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP. 134.99 VEHICLE REPAIR 355199:. 84139 1553.6180 134.99 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014- 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 387813 10/23/2014 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 387814 10123/2014 134833 WARD, BRENDA 75.00 JURIED SHOW PEER AWARD 355291 101514 5120.6103 75.00 387815 10/23/2014 132868 WEBER, RYAN 99.88 MILEAGE/ PARKING 99.88 355292 AASLH MEETING 1140.6104 387816 10/23/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 966.38 355332 7000921 2,802.58 355394.7001684 1,018.44 355463 7001685 4,787.40 387817 10/23/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 96.82 355340 1080240133 211.30 355335 1080240154 1,388.61 355333 1080240155 1,302.85 355334 1080240156 91.15 355336 1080240157 6,327.17 355339 1080240158 6,081.68 355337 1080240159 3,482.07 355338 1080240160 73.15 355342 1080240161 2,423.85 355341 1080240162 15.00- 355465 2080056865 15.00- 355464 2080056882 21,448.65 387818 10/2312014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 3,407.37 355343 1090301877 69.30 355344 1090301878 2,745.73 355348 1090301879 1,781.80 _ 355466 1090302275 3,253.65 355345 1090303084 358.00 355346 1090303085 23.10 355347 1090303086 4,550.90 355395 1090305471 16,189.85 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5862.5514 5862.5514 5842.5514 5862.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 Subledger Account Description Continued... 10120/201413:45:00 Page - 24 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LoGIS101 CITY OF tDINA 10/20/201413:45:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/23/2014— 10/23/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation, PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387818 10/23/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 387819 10/23/2014 106740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,324.50 VALLEY VIEW RD DESIGN 355255 4 -01686 -560 01377.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD 2,324.50 387820 10/23/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 7,265.45 51- 6121102 -5 355293 429990404 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41,093.21 51- 5605640 -1 355295 430700078 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 3,009.21 51- 6227619 -3 355294 430710960 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 125.87 51- 0010025256 -3 355434 430976749 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 51,493.74 - 387821 10/23/2014 134942 YEADON FABRIC DOMES & SEAMAN CORPORATION 332,063.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355362 100314 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 332,063.00 387822 10/2312014 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES LLC 199,648.44 EDINA SPORTS DOME 355361 US16024 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 199,646.44 387823 10/23/2014 101091 ZIEGLER INC 191.32 FILTERS 00005689 355200 PC001605738 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,763.30 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 355256 SW140141085 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,954.62 387824 10/2312014 102600 ZIMMERMAN, TIM 79.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355516 101414 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.96 2,215,842.92 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 2,146,853.99 A/P ACH Payment 68,988.93 Total Payments 2,215,842.92 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 10/20/201413:45:06 Council Check Summary Page 1 10/23/2014 - 10/23/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 226,255.49 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 11,268.10 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 4,771.57 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,003.79 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 109.79 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 2,805.88 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 11,054.01 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,675,480.71 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 7,306.33 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,444.32 05800 LIQUOR FUND 175,199.47 05900 UTILITY FUND 74,219.74 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 10,262.30 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND .: 2,457.33 09235 VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 10,204.09 Report Totals 2,215,842.92 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the - requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures d 3 Z `7 C. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 `Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary t 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 460 10/30/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 115.20 355739 1837622 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 115.20 461 10/30/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS . 413.22 COFFEE 355544 1148729 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 413.22 462 10/30/2014 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 912.00 SEPT 2014 SERVICES. 355653 136411 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 912.00 463 10130/2014 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION 230.60 ; 355745 45310300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,077.95 355962 45408800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.55 355965 45408900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,249.20 355963 45409000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,393.60 355966 - 45409200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 354.60 355747 6493100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 97.39 355746 90988400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 231.95 355964 91019200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,708.84 464 10/30/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 80.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355551 OE- 371798 -1 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 137.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355552 WO- 967116 -1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 18.37 CALCULATORS 00003091 355549 WO- 967300 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 127.80 LABELS 355550 WO- 967494 -1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 364.30 465 10/30/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 8.41 NUT `00005657 355655 895638 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.41 NUT 00005657 355656 895638X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.90 COOLANT 00005695 355657 900585 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 262.00 CONTROL 00005825 355994 903576 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 342.72 466 10/30/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 796.75 MATERIALS TESTING 355555 B011389 01417.1705.21. CONSULTING INSPECTION HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 13,072.25 MATERIALS TESTING 355662 B011407 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 597.50 MATERIALS TESTING 355845 B011474 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 466 10/30/2014 467 10/30/2014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 2330.6406 CITY OF EDINA 965.25 SP3 00004404 355996 PF20851 77.90 POWER ADAPTER FOR SP3 00004404 Council Check Register by GL PG41838 99.74 Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 355998 PG51088 965.25 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 356000 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 726.70 EPR DEMO DISPLAY 00004415 274.06 MATERIALS TESTING 355846 B011475 01408.1705.21 274.07 MATERIALS TESTING 355846 B011475 01407.1705.21 548.12 MATERIALS TESTING 355846`' B011475 '01409.1705.21 376.25 MATERIALS TESTING 355848 B011634 05502.1705.21 258.12 MATERIALS TESTING 355847 B011686 01257.1705.21 258.13 MATERIALS TESTING 355847 B011686 01258.1705.21 2,361.00 MATERIALS TESTING 355851 B011774 01406.1705.21 3,288.00 MATERIALS TESTING 355850 B011846 01423.1705.21 387.58 MATERIALS TESTING 355849 B011847 07118.1705.21 387.58 MATERIALS TESTING 355849 B011847 07119.1705.21 387.59 MATERIALS TESTING 355849 B011847 07123.1705.21 3,941.00 SOIL OBSERVATIONS & TESTING 355852 B012046 5550.1705 27,208.00 467 10/30/2014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 965.25 SP3 00004404 355996 PF20851 77.90 POWER ADAPTER FOR SP3 00004404 355997 PG41838 99.74 SP3 WARRANTY 00004404 355998 PG51088 965.25 SP3 00004411 355999 PQ18243 177.64 SP3-POWER AND WARRANTY 00004411 356000 PR66558 726.70 EPR DEMO DISPLAY 00004415 356001 PV92751 .697.50 SWITCH FOR PAMELA PARK 355663 PW38337 2,800:00 SWITCH FOR B FIELD 355664 PX03818 12,852.70 COMPUTER REPLACEMENTS 00004417 356002 QF03176 19, 362.68 468 10/3012014 104020 DALCO 193.17 GRILL CLEANER -. 356006 2806286 193.17 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4612.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 469 10/3012014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 73.80 355757 774951 5842.5515 1,816.35 355756 774952 5842.5514 2,179.89 355755 774953 5862.5514 4,070.04 470 10/30/2014 - 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 47.61 BAKERY 356009 527691 5421.5510 47.61 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 2 Business Unit WARDEN AVE HAWKES NHOOD RECON WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON WM -502 RAW WATER WELL15 TO WrP A -257 XERXES ALLEY 55THTO56TH A -258 XERXES ALLEY 54THTO55TH. MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON OLINGER BLVD M &O S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK 5119 YORK AVE SIDEWALK W SIDE VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET DRUG FORFEITURE DRUG FORFEITURE DRUG FORFEITURE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FD Plan Review Software PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET CENT SERV GEN - MIS GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKR2 LU - ;16101 19,668.00 CITY OF _ :.JA 10/30/2014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. Council Check Register by GL RUBBISH REMOVAL 26.72 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 103217 LHB, INC. 500.00 10/30/2014— 10/3012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 471 10/30/2014 123187 DORCAS WIDOWS FUND OIL 00006259 355871 529441 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES Continued... 657.50 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 355928 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 6.50 472 10/30/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 1,702.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 355586 14918 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,702.00 473 10/30/2014 132938 HOT DISH ADVERTISING LLC 3,335.62 NEW SIGNAGE 355600 21849 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,190.00 NEW SIGNAGE 355599 21850 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,525.62 474 10/30/2014 120086 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 963.75 VFD REPAIR 00001780 355601 6843 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 963.75 475 10/30/2014 129608 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 2,077.97 MAIL OCT 2014 UTILITY BILLS 355686 95157 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,077.97 476 10/30/2014 102146 JESSEN PRESS 10/28ik— 8:24:45 Page- 3 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING WATER TREATMENT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 6,770.00 ABOUT TOWN WATER REPORT 00001904 356027 666554 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 12,898.00 FALLABOUTTOWN 356028 666555 1130.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 355778 183421 5842.5515 1,229.43 RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19,668.00 477 10/30/2014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 26.72 TOILET SERVICE 356029 82917 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 26.72 478 10/30/2014 103217 LHB, INC. 500.00 ULI REGIONAL INDICATORS 355693 120205.00 -2 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 479 10130/2014 101792 LUBE -TECH 657.50 OIL 00006259 355871 529441 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 657.50 ARn 1n /3n /7n1A 117577 M AM11Nn-QnPJ 1 1 P 355778 183421 5842.5515 1,229.43 RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 ` Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 480 10/30/2014 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP Continued... 481 10/30/2014 101483 MENARDS 68.51 BATTERIES, RAKES, SPRAY HEADS 00001740 355609 66655 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 345.12 LUMBER 00001924 355610 69229 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.98 RATCHET 00001924 355611 69233 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.98 POLY TRAY 00001935 355613 69605 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 128.01 LUMBER, BLADES 00001339 355612 69637 1646.6577. LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 579.60 482 10/30/2014 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 588.95 STATION SUPPLIES 355904 35901 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 588.95 483 10/30/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 604.53 HYDRAULIC MOTOR 00006261 355877 987005 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 13.63 BALL 00006262 355878 988591 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 618.16 484 10/30/2014 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 1,090.49 TABLECOVERS 355880 308203 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,090.49 _ 486 1013012014 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 1,170.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 356036 103114 07114.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S114 GRIMES AVE SIDEWALK 420,772.94 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 356036 103114 01406.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 2,717.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 356036 103114 05537.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 27,288.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 356036 103114 03479.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 37,994.83 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 356036 103114 04395.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 489,943.92 486 10/30/2014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 86.00 TIRE DISPOSAL FEE 00005715 355625 210140532 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,458.50 TIRES 00005715 355884 210140534 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 260.00 TIRES 00005715 355711 210140566 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 735.92 TIRES 00005715 355883 210141756 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 2,540.42 487 10/30/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY. 340.34 TOWELS, NITRILE GLOVES 00007501 355626 7152 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 41.96 TOWELS 355907 7207 . 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 L-: S101 10 /2b,' -.a 8:24:45 TELEPHONE Page- 5 CITY O. -jNA Continued... PLANNING CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS Council Check Register by GL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary PROMENADE EXPENSES EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE 10/30/2014- '10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 487 10/30/2014 TELEPHONE 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 697.29 LINERS, GLOVES, WIPES 355627 7253 5511.6511 453.59 TISSUE, TOWELS, GLOVES 355905 7257 5761.6511 157.79 DISPENSER, SANITIZER 00002290 355885 7266 5720.6511 764.18 LINERS, TOWELS, CLEANERS 00002289 355886 7279 5720.6511 296.12 LINERS 355906 7285 5765.6511 2,751.27 488 10/30/2D14 100974 RAYMOND'E. HAEG PLUMBING 249.95 TOILET REPAIRS 355628 16530 5511.6180 249.95 489 10/30/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 57.50 BUSINESS CARDS 355629 83389 1550.6406 57.50 490 10130/2014 131676 SAINT'S COMMERCIAL FOOD SERVICE 118.26 COOKIES 356039 0086757 -IN 5421.5510 118.26 491 10/30/2014 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 68.51 FENCE MATERIAL 355888 41234302 1344.6577 68.51 492 10/30/2014 104672 SPRINT 13.20 355889 873184124 -10/14 1553.6188 16.50 355889 873184124 -10/14 1190.6188 48.48 355889 873184124 -10/14 1260.6188 49.00 355889 873184124 -10/14 1140.6188 56.21 355889 873184124 -10/14 1400.6188 83.71 355889 873184124 - 10/14 1280.6188 94.10 355889 873184124 -10/14 1552.6188 96.46 355889 873184124 -10/14 1322.6188 227.54 355889 873184124 -10/14 1301.6188 279.93 355889 873184124 -10/14 1470.6151 377.05 355889 873184124 -10/14 1640.6188 437.89 355889 873184124 -10/14 1400.6160 35.42 355889 873184124 -10/14 4090.6188 16.50 355889 873184124 -10/14 5511.6188 621.37 355889 873184124 -10/14 5910.6188 30.30 355889 873184124 -10/14 7411.6188 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE 10 /2b,' -.a 8:24:45 TELEPHONE Page- 5 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... PLANNING CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CLEANING SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE ASSESSING TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 _ Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 492 1013012014: 104672 SPRINT Continued... 1314.6406 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6530 2,483.66 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 493 10/30/2014 REPAIR PARTS 101004 SPS COMPANIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 37.89 PARTS 355635 S2977209.001 250.57 COPPER PIPE 00001943 355636 S2982972.001 288.46 494 10/30/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 237.15 ARMREST 00005684 355890 26838 57.58 CLIPS 00005691 355637 27988 23.59 RETAINERS 00005761 355638 29802 70.80 RETAINERS 00005761 355639 29804 129.95 VEHICLE REPAIR 355724 660411 57.58- CREDIT 00005691 355725 CM27988 461.49 495 10/30/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION - 724.26 CONCESSION PRODUCT 355647 40744685 724.26 496 1013012014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 128.00- 355806 368215 -00 513.90 355805 375257 -00 ' 1,645.70 355804 375265 -00 2,031.60 387825 10/30/2014 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 225.00 SAFETY DRIVING CLASSES 355542 092714 270.00 SAFETY DRIVING CLASSES 355543 101814 495.00 387826 10/30/2014 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 276.40 HOSE,-FITTINGS, FERRULE 355651 1- 862208 276.40 387827 10/30/2014 106476 ACE TRAILER SALES ' 260.05 NUTS, BOLTS, STRAPS 355540 'S034661 260.05 387828 10/30/2014 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN 1314.6406 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 6 Business Unit . STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE VERNON SELLING 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ` EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN-- r R55CKR2 L06IS101 CITY Or -iNA 10/28/2u14 8:24:45 Council Check Register. by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 10130/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387828 10130/2014 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN Continued... 12.32 ART WORK SOLD 355917 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.32 387829 10/3012014 134952 ALDRICH, EMILY 93.31 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355541 JAMES ABELN 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.31 387830 10/30/2014 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 30.03 HANDLE 00003878 355652 26436 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.03 387831 10/30/2014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 88.88 COFFEE 355840 36701 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 88.88 387832 10/30/2014 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 355918 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 23.40 387833 10/3012014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 344.69 CONCESSION PRODUCT 355841 410170447 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 467.79 FOOD 355987 410170529 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 812.48 387834 10/30/2014 131089 AQUATIC ROCK FORMATIONS LLC 823.20 WATERFALL ADDITION 355899 DOWNPAYMENT 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 823.20 387835 10/30/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 15.04- 355743 21714 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6.90- 355744 22277 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7.52- 355742 22278 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7.84- 355741 22279 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 779.00 355740 3001422 -- 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 727.00 355961 ,3002323 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 960.50 355960 3002324 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,429.20 387836 10/3012014 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 4,668.00 FRONT PLOW 00005286 355842 10138732 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 8 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' C ART CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINA CRIME FUND K9,DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 661.00 355748 171680 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 861.00 387845 '10/30/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 246.40 COFFEE 355548 1204719 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 246.40 387846 10130/2014 100649 BEST BUY BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 129.99 SP3 KEYBOARD 00004409 356989 1695738 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account De_ scription 387836 , 10/30/2014 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. Continued... 4,668.00 387837 10/30/2014 130718 AUTO -OWNERS INSURANCE 1,663.40 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355545 CHUE THAO 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,663.40 387838 10130/2014 121083 BARR, FRANK 146.25 ART WORK SOLD 355919 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 146.25 387839 10130/2014 134983 BCZ LLC 53.59 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355988 7466 CAHILL RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 53.59 387840' 10/30/2014 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 657.26 RUBBER FLOORING 355546 00100330 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 657.26 387841 10/3012014 101343 BEHR, JASON 96.19 K9 BOARDING 355547 101514 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.19 387842 10130/2014 100661 BENN, BRADLEY l 233.35 ART WORK SOLD 355920 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ' 233.35 387843 10/30/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 288.00 PIZZA 355843 D281N2768 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.00 387844 10/30/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 8 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' C ART CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINA CRIME FUND K9,DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 661.00 355748 171680 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 861.00 387845 '10/30/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 246.40 COFFEE 355548 1204719 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 246.40 387846 10130/2014 100649 BEST BUY BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 129.99 SP3 KEYBOARD 00004409 356989 1695738 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE R55CKR2 L--6101 CITY G. ;NA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary, 10/30/2014- 10130/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No, Account No - Subledger Account Description 387846 10/30/2014 100649 BEST BUY BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT Continued... 479.98 SP3 KEYBOARD 00004412 355990 1697253 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 349.99- RETURN 355991 1706530. 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 259.98 387847 10/30/2014 132641 BEST, KATIE 63.70 ART WORK SOLD 355921 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 63.70 387848 10/30/2014 130569 BINTNER, ROSS 254.24 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 355654 102014 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 254.24 387849 10/30/2014 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 75,470.00 PAVE VAN VALKENBURG LOT 35.5844 23078 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75,470.00 387850 10/30/2014 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 29,929.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355911 103114 01257.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 29,929.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355911 103114 01258.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 59,859.49 387851 10/30/2014 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 602.87 ART SUPPLIES 00009368 355992 3621172 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 602.87 387852 10/30/2014 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 25,987.50 NOV 2014 PREMIUMS 355900 11006 - 10/14 1556.6643 COBRA INSURANCE 181,593.50 NOV 2014 PREMIUMS 355900 11006 -10/14 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 207,581.00 387853 10/30/2014 134985 BOETTCHER, RONNA 179.00 ART CLASS REFUND 355993 3221 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 179.00 387854 10130/2014 117411 BONK, RICHARD 5.20 ARTWORK SOLD 355922 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 5.20 387855 10/30/2014 123414 BOOM, CHET 99.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355658 102114 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 10/26,-' - .4 8:24:45 Page- 9 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES ENGINEERING GENERAL PATHS & HARD SURFACE A -257 XERXES ALLEY 55THT056TH A -258 XERXES ALLEY 54THT055TH ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council.Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387855 10/30%2014 123414 BOOM, CHET Continued... 99.95 387856 10/30/2014 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY - 373.57 WIRE, CONDUIT 00001928 355659 908205543 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 467.85 GENERATOR PLUG 00001928 355660 908210638 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 841.42 387857 10/3012014 134928 BOSSARDT CORPORATION 9,153.35 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 355553 20274 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 9,153.35 387858 10/30/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,204.90 ROTARY ADVERTISING 355749 122026 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 198.50 355750 122749 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 366.00 355751 122772 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,769.40 - 387859 10130/2014 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 172.00 ROOM RENTAL, COFFEE 355661 2476 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 100.00 ROOM RENTAL FOR SEMINAR 355554 2486 5510.6186 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 272.00 ' 387860 10/30/2014 134973 BUSH, JAMES 150.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355853 424 HARRISON 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 150.00 387861 10/30/2014 134976 CSR STENCILS 230.00 PRINTED SIGNS 355854 CRS2443 5960.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM - 230.00 387862 10/30/2014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF > 364.00 GOLF CLUBS 355995 925522840 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 364.00 387863 10/30/2014 102482 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY 1,036.95 OFF LEASH PARK-COLLARS 355556 0307426 -IN 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL 1,036.95 387864 10/3012014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES R55CKR2 LOulS101 CITY Or AA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387864 10/30/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 2,751.35 355752 431839 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 51.85 355753 436294 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,803.20 387865 10130/2014 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 355923 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 39.00 387866 10130/2014 102496 CEMSTONE CONTRACTOR SUPPLY. 590.00 CEMENT MIX FOR DUGOUTS 00001860 355557 P1375156 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 590.00 381867 10/30/2014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 50.40 355855 8000014561 -10/1 1481.6186 HEAT 4 85.10 355855 8000014561 -10/1 1628.6186 HEAT . 4 278.82 355855 8000014561 -10/1 1552.6186 HEAT 4 363.52 355855 8000014561 -10/1 1646.6186 HEAT 4 278.70 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5111.6186 HEAT 4 30.60 355855 8000014561 -1011 5430.6186 HEAT 4 31.84 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5422.6186 HEAT 4 126.73 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5420.6186 HEAT 4 2,714.11 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5511.6186 HEAT 4 144.73 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5761.6186 HEAT 4 27.88 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5821.6186 HEAT 4 29.19 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5841.6186 HEAT 4 31.90 355855 8000014561 -10/1" 5861.6186 HEAT 4 121.00 355855 8000014561 -1011 5921.6186 HEAT 10/28;-_ ., 8:24:45 Page - 11 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUNDBPATt YORK FIRE STATION SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT ~ R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/28/20148:24:45 . Council Check Register by GL Pager 12 .: Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387867 10/30/2014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 4 - 131.82 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 4 ' 1,153.15 355855 8000014561 -10/1 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 4 5,599.49 387868 10/30/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 624.83 5563827 -4 355559 5563827 -10/14 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 548.24 8034001 -1 355560 8034001 -10/14 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,062.67 9724639 -1 355558 9724639 -10/14 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,235.74 387869 10/30/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 60.07 952944 -6522 355561 6522 -10/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 60.07 387870 10/3012014 100683 CHEMSEARCH 669.12 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 355562 1670596 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS. 669.12 387871 10/30/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 755.67 00114064- 0203163012 355564 203163012 -10/14 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 670.53 00101025- 0203600013 355565 203600013 -10/14 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS • 2,030.71 00101025- 0203610011 355563 203610011 -10/14 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 3,456.91 387872 10/3012014 123941 CLAY, CAROL 4.55 ART WORK SOLD 355924 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.55 387873 10130/2014,. 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 281.20 355754 0168159413 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING ' 281.20 387874 10/3012014 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 825.99 NOV 2014 SERVICE 355566 110114 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 825.99 387876 10/30/2014 120433 COMCAST R55CKR2 LUGIS101 S121 STRACHAUERPARK B SIDEWALK CITY L—:. _MINA ART CENTER REVENUES CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS Council Check Register by GL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 387876 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary GENERAL MAINTENANCE 134954 COMCAST 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No' Subledger- Account Description 387875 10/30/2014 120433 COMCAST TO PARKING RAMP Continued... 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 356045 373022 -10/14 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 73.84 6772 10 614 0419856 355567. 419858 -10/14 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 170.14 8772 10 614 0496856 356603 496856 -10/14 5210.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BLACKTOP COST OF GOODS SOLD 10/26:_114 8:24:45 Page - 13 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING STREET RENOVATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MATERIALS /SUPPLIES S121 STRACHAUERPARK B SIDEWALK 250.75 ART CENTER REVENUES CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 387876 1013012014 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 134954 COMCAST 1,337.00 COMCAST TO PARKING RAMP 355665 60802423 44012.6710 1,337.00 387877 10/30/2014 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 38,358.82 HOT MIX 356004 101514 1314.6518 38,358.82 387876 10130/2014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 602.13 BIRTHDAY BAGS 355856 32368 5720.5510 602.13 387879 10/30/2014 103833 CROW - HASSAN NURSERY L.L.C. 1,100.00 REPLACEMENT TREES 356005 3104 07121.1705.31 1,100.00 387880 10/30/2014 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 355925 102014 5101.4413 6.50 387881 10/30/2014 134475 D R HORTON INC 2,500.00 ED133749 ESCROW REFUND 355666 5932 ZENITH AVE 1495.4109 2,500.00 387882 10/30/2014 129884 DEARBORN'NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 3,186.10 NOV 2014 PREMIUMS 355667 F018342 -11/14 990.0.2033.16 3,186.10 387883 10/30/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 1.84 TORX BIT 00005653 355568 938799 1553.6556 6.94 SOCKETS 00005670 355569 939973 1553.6556 31.50 AMMETER 00005782 355857 942878 1553.6556 10.55 SOCKETS 00005670 355570 943914 1553.6556 964.07 TOOLS 356007 945386 1314.6406 69.95 SAFE TOOL 355858 945790 1301.6610 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BLACKTOP COST OF GOODS SOLD 10/26:_114 8:24:45 Page - 13 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING STREET RENOVATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MATERIALS /SUPPLIES S121 STRACHAUERPARK B SIDEWALK ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary ' 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387883 10/30/2014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 126.73 CALIPERS, DROP ARM CREEPER 00005789 355859 946020 1553.6556 TOOLS 28.37 WORK LIGHT 00005793 356008 947253 1553.6556 TOOLS - 1,239.95 387884 10/30/2014 134979 DEPEW, CHARLOTTE 2.11 ART WORK SOLD 355926 102214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2.11 387885 10/30/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 26.50 650487671 355571 650487671 -10/14 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 26.50 387886 10130/2014 - 134965 DEXTOR, BETTY 6.00 CANCELLED ST CROIX TRIP 355668 REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 6.00 387887 10130/2014 124358 DILL, SARAH 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 355927 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 9.75 387888 10130/2014 134950 DOSH, REBECCA 120.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355572 5924 WOODDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 120.00 387889 10130/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 42.56 PUBLISH NOTICE - 355573 148453 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 81.80 PUBLISH NOTICE 355576 152800 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 79.80 PUBLISH NOTICE 355575 152801 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 31.92 PUBLISH NOTICE 355574 152802 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 236.08 387890 10/30/2014 101666 EDINA CHORALE - 133.32 AD IN CONCERT PROGRAMS 355669 2014 -2015 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 133.34 AD IN CONCERT PROGRAMS 355669 2014 -2015 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 133.34 AD IN CONCERT PROGRAMS 355669 2014 -2015 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 400.00 387891 10/30/2014 103069 EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 500.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 355929 102414 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA ADMINISTRATION SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING,. PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING MUSIC IN EDINA. R55CKR2 c_ -;.S101 CITY G. .iNA 10/2b _- �4 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387891 10/30/2014 103069 EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Continued... 500.00 387892 10/3012014 134959 EDINA MORNINGSIDE CONDOMINIUM 177.12 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 355670 GREEN ACRES 01406.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 177.12 387893 10/3012014 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 50.32 PHOTO CONTESTAWARD 355577 92863 1130.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 50.32 387894 10/30/2014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 57.87 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003708 355671 1684215 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.87 387895 10/3012014 134966 EMSAR MIDWEST 1,442.72 COT MAINTENANCE 355672 SI -12985 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,442.72 387896 10/3012014 134661 ESP IT 3,608.00 SUPPORT SPECIALIST 355901 10048 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,608.00 387897 10/30/2014 134968 EXPERT ASPHALT 892.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIRS 355673 2096 01406.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 892.00 387898 10/30/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 266.03 MODULE KIT 355579 1- 4546821 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.71 C SENSOR 355583 1- 4553946 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.00 BATTERY 356012 1- 4558144 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.09 FUEL CLIP 355578 6- 1381525 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.71 FUEL KIT SENSOR 355580 69- 153906 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.09 FUEL CLIP 355581 69- 154033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 300.44 CONDENSER ASSEMBLY 355674 69- 155504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.02 WIPER 356011 69- 155665 1553.6530' REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.22 SILICONE 355860 69- 155679 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 408.68 PADS, ROTORS 356010 69- 155681 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.00 BATTERY 356013 69- 155833 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.09 FUEL CLIP 355582. 70- 206860 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,252.08 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary - 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger , Account Description 387898 10/30/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 387899 10/30/2014 134984 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS LLC 22,266.00 MICROSURFACING 356014 29461 1314.6518 BLACKTOP" 22,266:00 387900 10/30/2014 122649 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 51 B.68 CONCESSION PRODUCT 355584 3444373 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 518.68 387901 10130/2014 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 329.50 ELECTION SIGNS 355675 190 -67186 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 329.50 387902 10/3012014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 273.79 COUPLINGS 00001887 355676 0114207 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 252.70- CREDIT 00001887 355677 CM010448 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.09 387903 10/30/2014 133267 FILBIN, SUSAN 21.45 ART WORK SOLD 355930 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 21.45 387904 10/3012014 101476 FOOTJOY 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page -, 16 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION ARENA CONCESSIONS ELECTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER REVENUES 39.09 SHIRT 356016 5883363 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 113.27 SHOES 356015 5884758 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 152.36 387905 10/30/2014 126726 FORTNER, NOLA 3.25 ART WORK SOLD 355931 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 3.25 387906 1013012014 134961 F'REAL FOODS LLC 10,397.13 CONCESSION EQUIPMENT 355678 979153 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10,397.13 387907 10/30/2014 119619 FRESHWATER SOCIETY 21.95 CALENDAR 355861 2015 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 21.95 387908 10/30/2014 134951 FULLERTON, KATHERINE ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA CONCESSIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKR2 L-_;5101 39.00 CITY O� JA 387912 10/30/2014 Council Check Register by GL 134980 GNAZZO, MAXINE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2.60 ARTWORK SOLD 355932 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 5101.4413 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387908 10/30/2014 134951 FULLERTON, KATHERINE Continued... 16.86 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355585 4315 GRIMES AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND BUSINESS OF GOLF BOOK 16.86 537 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 387909 10/30/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 355862 1006529990 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 15.00 355863 1006552730 5422.6201 LAUNDRY ART WORK SOLD 30.00 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 387910 10/30/2014 133954 GEMPLER, JUDITH 15.00 SENIOR TRIP REFUND 341476 050514 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 15.00 399.71 387911 10/30/2014 355864 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 5210.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 10/28,__.-+ 8:24:45 Page- 17 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SENIOR CITIZENS 39.00 SKATE SHARPENING 355587 88252 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENAADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT WELL HOUSES BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL HOUSES 39.00 387912 10/30/2014 134980 GNAZZO, MAXINE 2.60 ARTWORK SOLD 355932 102214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2.60 387913 10130/2014 128205 GOLF CONVERGENCE INC. 107.98 BUSINESS OF GOLF BOOK 355679 537 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 107.98 387914 10130/2014 133258 GORDON, KIM 2.28 ART WORK SOLD 355933 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2.28 387915 10/30/2014 101103 GRAINGER 399.71 ROPE 00006275 355864 9559412003 5210.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 48.51 WIRE GUARD 00006278 355867 9561825481. 5210.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50.85 WIRE GUARD 00006278 355865 9561825499 5210.6406 " GENERALSUPPLIES 22.18 CLOSED SIGNS 00006276 355866 9562501859 5431.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 39.75 LIP BALM 00001872 355588 9562939752 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 911.84 STEPLADDERS 00001920 355590 9564167675 5915.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 383.35 STEPLADDER 00001920 355589 9564167683 5915.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 139.35 THERMOSTATS 00001929 355681 9567398616 5912.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 140.76 GLOVES 00001931 355592 9567736898 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 71.51 MEASURING WHEEL 00001932 355591 9567736906 1322.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 139.35 THERMOSTATS 00001929 356017 9568245378 5912.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT WELL HOUSES BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL WELL HOUSES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014- 10130/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387915 10/3012014 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 27.12 SAFETY GLASSES 00005720 355680 9568245386 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 30.29 RULER, TRAPS 00005720 355680 9568245386 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 148.00 COAT HOOKS, GAS CAN 00005791 356018 9571615641 1553:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,552.57 387916 10/30/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 402.50 355760 172918 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 343.50 355759 173035 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,091.95 355758 173205 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,837.95 387917 10/3012014 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 370.89 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001905 356020 144669 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 194.89 COUPLINGS, DRIP PIPE 356019 144670 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154.60 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001905 356021 144671 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 720.38 387918 1013012014 100155 GRITTON, KAY 42.90 ART WORK SOLD 355934 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 42.90 387919 10/30/2014 134962 GROWING CHAMPIONS FOR LIFE 1,850.00 WORKSHOPS 355682 101 -14 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,850.00 387920 10/30/2014 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 903.20 INK CARTRIDGES 00002631 355593 310577 1261.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 613.78 PRINTHEADS 00002636 355594 310631 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1;516.98 H H MPANY 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 18 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER REVENUES ARENAADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 387921 10/30/2014 100790. AC CO 238.69 REAGENT 00001941 355596 . 9076997 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 238.69 387922 10/3012014 132996 HAMMARGREN & MEYER P.A. 1,728.00 LEGAL FEES 355595 17231 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,728.00 387923 10/30/2014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,721.36 NOV 2014 PREMIUMS 355683 _6926830 -8 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 ARENA ADMINISTRATION PAYROLL CLEARING R55CKR2 LUG 1S101 CITY Or __AA 10/28/2614 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387923 10/30/2014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS Continued... 3,721.36 387924 10/30/2014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 139.20 NOV 2014 PREMIUMS 355902 6915019 -1 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 4,047.43 NOV 2014 PREMIUMS 355902 6915019 -1 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 4,186.63 387925 10/30/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 8,002.92 CHEMICALS 00001250 356022 3657064 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 8,002.92 387926 10/30/2014 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 1,340.72 PIPE FITTINGS 00001921 355597 D092794 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,340.72 387927 10/30/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 201.12 BEEF PATTIES 356023 025406 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 201.12 387928 10/30/2014 117186 HELGREN,'ADAM 36.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 356024 102214 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDINGMAINTENANCE 36.98 387929 10130/2014 100801 HEN NEPIN'COUNTY TR EASUkR 20.00 NOTARY COMMISSION 355684 RENEWAL 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 20.00 387930 10/3012014 106436 HENNEPIN'COUNTY TREASURER 1,796.70 RADIO FLEET FEES 355868 1000050056 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,796.70 387931 10130/2014 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 304.00 LCD'S 00004405 356025 54798051 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 304.00 387932 10/30/2014 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 297.50 ATHLETIC STRIPING PAINT 00001871 355598 103985 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 297.50 387933 10/30/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387933 10130/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 1,431.38 355764 727870 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,403.37 355762 728888 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 56.00 355761 728889 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,487.00 355763 729264 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,377.75 387934 10/3012014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 89.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355833 102014 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 89.98 387936 10/30/2014 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 70.42 KY CONFERENCE EXPENSES 355685 102114 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 70.42 387936 10130/2014 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 4.88 ARTWORK SOLD 355935 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.88 387937 10/3012014 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 309.09 355687 608298957 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 309.09 387938 10130/2014 100409 IN CONTROL INC. 780.00 PLC PROGRAMMING 00001780 356026 14007DB01 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 780.00 387939 10/3012014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 374.00 355765 23684 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 374.00 387940 10/30/2014 134953 INDIGITAL _ 13,217.86 SCAN BACK CC PACKETS 355602 10628 4418.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENI .. 13,217.86 387941 10/30/2014 118276 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 44.50 NOTARY STAMP 355869 308842 1140.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PLANNING 44.50 CUSTOM STAMPER 355603 308843 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 89.00 ;. 387942 1013012014 100828 JERRY S FOODS R55CKR2 Lam. 6101 CITY 0. _ ',NA Coup, cil Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No :Inv No Account No Subledger Accoun4 Description 387942 10/30/2014 100828 JERRY'S FOODS Continued... 4.99 355604 093014 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 387943 10/30/2014 49.49' 88.00 4,783.60 208.60 7,777.55 196.65 49.17- 128.00 13,133.23 355604 093014 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 10/28/G614 8:24:45 Page - 21 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS GRILL 355766 2273159 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 355969 2273174 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 355767 2273175 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 355968 2273179 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 355970 2273180 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING' 355971 2273186 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 355967 2288729 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 387944 10130/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 672.00 355769 1959184 1.16 355777 5009409 2.32 355974 5009410 2,605.69 355972 5009412 948.85 355976 5009413 2,553.67 355977 5009414 2,270.04 355973 5009415 1,081.77 355978 5009416 31.41 355979 5009417 6,960.02 355975 5009418 2,272.00 355980 5009419 6,140.52 355776 5009420 2,272.00 355770 5009421 3,661.66 355775 5009422 551.25 355772 5009423 1,594.23 355771 5009424 1,532.20 .355774 5009425 485.88 355773 5009426 11.06 BAL DUE 355768 635405 35,647.73 387946 10/30/2014 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI 59.80 ARTWORK SOLD 355936 102114 59.80 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR, VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING - 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 22 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 250.00 PIANO TUNING 355690 EDINA SR 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS CTR -2014 250.00 387951 10/30/2014 130215 KUEHL,' RHONDA 13.00 ARTWORK SOLD 355937 102114 5101.4419 ART WORK SOLD 13.00 387952 10/30/2014 113676 LAMETTI & SONS INC. ART CENTER REVENUES 197,289.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355913 101514 03485.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRUNK SS LINING 197,289.35 CITY OF EDINA, R55CKR2 LOGIS101 134956 LAWMEN'S AND SHOOTERS' SUPPLY INC. 1,643.04 AMMO 00003089 355691 129211 1400.6551 Council Check Register by GL 1,643.04 . Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 387954 10/30/2014 100852' LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 10/30/2014— 10/3012014 307.13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387946 10/3012014 356030 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Continued... 219.93 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355834 102214 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE 219.93 , 19,166.00 387947 10/30/2014 355692 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,680.00 TREE REMOVAL 00001949 355870 6028 FAIRFAX 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,680.00 _ 387948 1013012014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 129.58 00003873 355689 257481 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 64.14 UNIFORMS 00003865 355688 257945 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 193.72 387949 10130/2014 101671 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 74,385.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355912 101014 08060.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 74,385.00 387950 10/30/2014 105730 KJOS PHIL 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page- 22 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 250.00 PIANO TUNING 355690 EDINA SR 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS CTR -2014 250.00 387951 10/30/2014 130215 KUEHL,' RHONDA 13.00 ARTWORK SOLD 355937 102114 5101.4419 ART WORK SOLD 13.00 387952 10/30/2014 113676 LAMETTI & SONS INC. ART CENTER REVENUES 197,289.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355913 101514 03485.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRUNK SS LINING 197,289.35 387953 10/30/2014 134956 LAWMEN'S AND SHOOTERS' SUPPLY INC. 1,643.04 AMMO 00003089 355691 129211 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 1,643.04 387954 10/30/2014 100852' LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 307.13 BULBS, FITTINGS, CONNECTORS 00005692 355605 9302799396 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 200.85 WASHERS, BULBS, SEALANT 00005698 356030 9302818962 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 507.98 387955 10/3012014 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE 19,166.00 SEPT 2014 FEES 355692 102014 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' LEGAL SERVICES R55CKR2 CITY Oi .,4A Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387955 10130/2014 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE Continued... 19,166.00 387956 1013012014 129577 LEES, NANCY 10/28/z..'.4 8:24:45 Page- 23 Business Unit 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 355938 102214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 387957 10/3012014 100558 LIND'ELECTRONIC DESIGN CO INC. 179.95 POWER FOR MOTORCYCLE PC 355606 297281 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 179.95 387968 10/30/2014 133524 LINDEMANN, TRISTEN 22.07 ART WORK SOLD 355939 102214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 22.07 387959 10130/2014 100858 LOGIS 420.75 355607 39100 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,178.00 355607 39100 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES rrR Or _ I.-I I-- 387960 10/30/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 11.32 GASKETS 00005819 355872 2146551 11.32 387961 10/30/2014 1 134974 MADDEN, JOHN 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 450.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355873 5501 HUNTER ST. 5900.2015 450.00 387962 10130/2014 114694 MARTIN, ANTHONY 270.75 DISPATCH RADIO PAAMPLIFIER 355608 -102014 270.75 387963 10/30/2014 122878 MARTT, DOROTHEA 320.00 HOSTING FEES 356046 200 320.00 387964 10/30/2014 134646 MCGRATH, PATTY 82.32 AUG 2014 MILEAGE 355903 102414 110.32 SEPT 2014 MILEAGE 355903 102414 2310.6406 1130.6103 5710.6107 5710.6107 CUSTOMER REFUND GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ART CENTER REVENUES CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS E911 CITY WIFI PROJECT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTILITY BALANCE SHEET E911 COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 10/2812014 8:24:45 Page - 24 ART CENTER REVENUES EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ENGINEER SERVICES -WATER DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 ' Council Check Register by GL - Council Check Register by Invoice &,Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No- Subledger Account Description 387964 10130/2014 134646, MCGRATH, PATTY Continued... 192.64 387965 10/30/2014 134187 MCMAHON, MARY JO _ r; 8.13 ART WORK SOLD 355940 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 8.13 - 387966 10/3012014, 134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 60,974.42 " PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 355914 103114 01411.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 374.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 355914 103114 03483.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 61,348.72 387967 10130/20/4 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 147.50 2 ADDITIONAL PASSENGERS 355695 101614 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 73.75 1 ADDITIONAL PASSENGER 355696 102114 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 1,991.25 CHANHASSEN THEATER TRIP 355694" OCTOBER 29 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 2,212.50 387968 10/30/2014 101987 MENARDS 59.21 HOSE, CHALKBOARDS, BRUSH 00005313 355874 53838 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.21 387969 10/30/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 19.77 INDICATOR 00005700 355697 491113 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 24.73 RELAY 00005820 355875 491166 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS. 44.50 387970 10/30/20.14 104650 MICRO CENTER 34.99- USB FOR LINDMAN 355876 5229173 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 34.99 387971 10130/2014 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 148.01 LAKE EDINA POSTCARDS 355699 73940 1120.6575 PRINTING - 157.10 ARDEN PARK POSTCARDS 355698 73941 1120.6575 PRINTING 305.11 387972 10130/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 3,500.00 WATER PIPE UPGRADE 355614 34775 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,252.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001698 355617 34813 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,590.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001899 i 355616 34815 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 795.00 STAND PIPE REPLACEMENT 00001900 355615 34816 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10/2812014 8:24:45 Page - 24 ART CENTER REVENUES EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ENGINEER SERVICES -WATER DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOUIS101 CITY Or —1iNA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary. 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387972 10/30/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &WATER Continued... 8,137.50 387973 10/30/2014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 355700 928029853 5841:6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 32.18 WINDOW CLEANING 355701 928029854 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 53.56 387974 1013012014 134550 MINNESOTA DESIGN BUILD 2,500.00 r ED132264 ESCROW REFUND 355702 5100 58TH ST W 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 387975 10/3012014 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 312.50 VIC AT CENT LAKES PROMENADE 355703 7700007860 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 312.50 387976 10/3012014 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 25.00 MRPA LUNCHEON 355618 8316 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 25.00 387977 10/30/2014 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,048.00 CRS2 355704 71621 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,048.00 387978 10/3012014 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 504.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 355619 31035 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 504.00 387979 10/30/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 162.48 FLANGE, COUPLINGS, 355620 0106782 -IN 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION - 15.92 CAM LOCK FASTENERS 00005763 355705 0106913 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 178.40 387980 10/3012014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 274.29 EVENT PROGRAM 355621 16113 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 116.00 POSTCARDS /POSTERS 356031 16464 MUSIC IN 2611.6575 PRINTING MUSIC IN EDINA EDINA 390.29 387981 10/30/2014 - 134703 MJL HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ED133844 ESCROW REFUND 355706 5717 YORK AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 R55CKR2, ' LOGIS101, Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Eicplanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 387981 10/30/2014 134703 MJL HOMES LLC Continued... 2,500.00 387982 40/3012014. 134982F1,MN COMMERCIAL ASSOC .OF REAL-ESTATE 230.00 MNCAR SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL - 356032 2015091 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 230.00 387983 10/30/2014 -101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 2,403.00 MN GOLFER MAGAZINE AD 356033 2014 -31150 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,403.00 - 387984 10/30/2014 114343 MULLEN, JANET 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 355941 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 387985 10/3012014 121125 NEMER, KAREN s.` 109.34 ART WORK SOLD 355942 102014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES L 109.34 387986 10/30/2014 129551 NEON IMAGES LLC 155.55 REFURBISH WINDOW SIGN 355879 6732 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 1- 155.55 387987 10130/2014 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 2,745.51 POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTENANCE 355707 52088108 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,745.51 387988 10130/2014 134977 NEW LIFE RESTORATION 14,328.00 POOL JOINT CAULKING 00002287 356034 445 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 14,328.00 367989 10/30/2014 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 270.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355881 102214 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 270.00 _ 387990 10/3012014 104350 NIKE USA INC. 45.86 JACKET 356035 964634965 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 45.86 387991 .10/3012014 126510 NORLING, JAIMIE 21.00 CINDERELLA BALL REFUND 355882 REFUND 1600.4390.47 ONCE UPON ASTAR PARTIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 L-6101 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 CITY Or —NA CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WARDEN AVE 92,478.22 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 Council Check Register by GL CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 522.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 7,908.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 10/30/2014— 10130/2014 HAWKES NHOOD RECON Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387991 10/30/2014 126610 NORLING, JAIMIE 387998 ' 10/30/2014 Continued:.. 21.00 66,342.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355958 387992 10/30/2014 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 102460 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 66,342.40 5,900.29 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 355915 101714 07122.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 29,788.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 355915 101714 05547.1705.30 CONTRACTOR'PAYMENTS OLINGER BLVD M &O 73,327.33 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 355915 101714 05548.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 142,337.17 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 355915 101714 05502.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 251, 352.87 387993 10130/2014 126267 NORTON, PAT 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 355943 102214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 22.75 387994 10/30/2014 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 191.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 355622 733183546001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 191.98 387996 10/30/2014 124089 OHMANN; NANCY 89.05 ART WORK SOLD 355944 102014 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD 89.05 387996 10/30/2014. 134967 PACKAGING UNLIMITED LLC 699.00 BULK SALT 355708 1901 1318.6525 SALT 699.00 BULK SALT 355709 1902 1318.6525 SALT 1,398.00 387997 10/30/2014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 10/28/2U14 8:24:45 Page - 27 Business Unit S122 XERXES SIDEWALK COCORD WM LOOP WM WM -502 RAW WATER WELL15 TO WfP ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 641.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WARDEN AVE 92,478.22 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 522.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 03480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 7,908.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 05538.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 47,276.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 355916 103114 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 148,826.99 387998 ' 10/30/2014 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 66,342.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355958 102414 05555.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Watermain Breaks - Street Rep 66,342.40 387999 10/30/2014 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY . 509,166.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 355959 103114 01423.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS OLINGER BLVD M &O R55CKR2 LOGIS101 3,193.10 CITY OF EDINA 8470978 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register by GL 355779 8470998 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4,176.19 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 387999 1013012014 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 337.35 Continued... 355623 46816625 509,166.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 388000 1013012014 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 388004 10/3012014 41.60 ART WORK SOLD 355945 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 41.60 6.83 ARTWORK SOLD 388001 10/3012014 5101.4413 102440 PASS, GRACE ART CENTER REVENUES 6.83 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 355946 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 388006 10/30/2014 6.50 134964 PETERSON, SUZANNE 388002 10/30/2014 100347 . PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 6.00 CANCELLED TRIP TO ST CROIX 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page - 28 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES - 3,193.10 355780 8470978 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 983.09 355779 8470998 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,176.19 -• 388003 10/30/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 337.35 355623 46816625 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 337.35 388004 10/3012014 116626 PETERSON; HARRIETTE 6.83 ARTWORK SOLD 355947 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.83 388006 10/30/2014 134964 PETERSON, SUZANNE 6.00 CANCELLED TRIP TO ST CROIX 355710 REFUND 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 6.00 388006 10130/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 35.58 355981 2687077 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.48 355786 2687078 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 81.16 355781 2687079 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,155.96 355982 2687081 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,063.20 355984 2687082 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 681.88 355983 2687083 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,258.86 355783 2687084 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.32 355784 2687085 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,225.82 355785 2687086 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,017.40 355782 2687087 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11,637.66 R55CKR2 L:.i.8101 CITY O.- _;NA 10/28/2U14 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388007 10/3012014 100119 PING Continued... 98.05 GOLF BAG 356037 12524630 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 98.05 388008 10/30/2014 133460 PITSCHKA, CHARLES 55.25 ART WORK SOLD 355948 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.25 388009 10130/2014 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 190.00 STAFF PORTRAITS 355624 101614 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 190.00 388010 10/3012014 133204 PRINT MEDIA 1,146.00. ENVELOPES 356047 17984 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,146.00 . 388011 10/30/2014 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 778.50 BEARINGS, BOLTS, FILTERS 00006252 355887 CD1841171 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 778.50 388012 10130/2014 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 950.82 CRS2 355712 4600 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 950.82 388013 10/30/2014 106324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 6,260.00 SIREN 355908 98749 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT 6,260.00 388014 10/3012014 134981 RECKE, MICHELLE 357.50 2014 JURIED SHOW 355949 102414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 357.50 388016 10/30/2014 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 ED123183 ESCROW REFUND 355713 5512 KELLOGG 1495.4109 AVE 2,500.00 388016 10/30/2014 106036 REITER, JERRY 144.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 356038 102214 144.92 1646.6201 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT LAUNDRY INSPECTIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388017 10130/2014 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH Continued... ' 245.02 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355835 102214 1301:6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 245.02 388018 •10/30/2014 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 811.79 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE 355909 102414 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 811.79 388019 10/3012014 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 1,275.00 TRAINING 355714 101714 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING - 1,275.00 388020. 10/3012014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 11.42- CREDIT 355910 102014 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 22.26 FOOD FOR BBQ 355910 102014 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 166.42 FOOD FOR BBQ 355910 102014 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 177.26 388021 10/3012014 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 355715 INV -18239 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 772.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 355716 INV -18375 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 822.00 388022 10/30/2014 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 22.10 ART WORK SOLD 355950 102114 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES .. 22.10 388023 10/30/2014 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN 159.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355836 102014 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 159.00 388024 10/3012614 105514 SCHIRO, DOUG 248.10 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355837 101714 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 248.10 388026 10/30/2014 100995 SEH 613.92 BRAEMAR GC WETLANDS 355718 287372 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN'PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,102.40 NORMANDALE ST RECON 355631 287865 04390.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 2,596.37 54TH ST BID DOCS & CPS 355630 287866 01416.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR 102,128.75 ARDEN PARK D PRELIM 355717 287868 01412.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 605.95 INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 355632 288028 08060.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING R55CKR2 , jIS101 CITY L�. _JINA 10/2or:.�14 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388025 10130/2014 100996 SEH Continued... 107,047.39 388026 10/30/2014 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 499.50 008816 - OCT 2014 355720 100314 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 499.50 388027 10/30/2014 105778 SEWARD CONCERT BAND 50.00 EP PERFORMANCE 11/09/14 355898 102314 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50.00 388028 10130/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 33.78 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 355952 102014 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 124.54 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 355952 102014 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 178.76 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 355952 102014 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 7.80 ART WORK SOLD .355951 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 344.88 368029 10/30/2014 127619 SIEGEL, LISA 14.92 ART WORK SOLD 355953 102.214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.92 388030 10/30/2014 131082 SIEMON, KELLEY 90.00 CLASS REFUND 355719 REFUND 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 90.00 388031 10/3012014 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 DASHERBOARD 355633 8344 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 185.00 DASHERBOARD 355634 8368 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 370.00 388032 10/30/2014 130819 SIPE, JODY 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 11/2114 355896 102314 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 388033 10/30/2014 100430 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 137.66 RATCHET WITH HANDLE 00005786 355721 ARV/23831242 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 137.66 388034 10/30/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 724.13 355793 1214893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page - 32 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register by GL YORK SELLING Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 388034 10/30/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 724.72 355794 1214894 5842.5512 - 6,799.58 355791 1216027 5842.5513 2,305.75 355792 1216028 5842.5513 4,353.30 355790 1216029 5842.5512 39.62 355789 1216030 5842.5515 .75 355787 1216031 5862.5512 5,442.75 355796 1216032 5862.5513 .75 355799 1216033 5862.5513 5,795.38 355797 1216034 5862.5513 2,512.25 355788 1216035 5862.5512 .75 355795 1216036 5862.5513 648.25 355985 1216636 5842.5513 1,996.45 355798 5007462 5862.5513 132.00- 355800 9038014 5862.5513 31,212:43 1,518.50 140798 REFUND 355722 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page - 32 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 110977 SOW, ADAMA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS,SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 388036 10/30/2014 110977 SOW, ADAMA 143.00 ART WORK SOLD 355954 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD. ART CENTER REVENUES 143.00 388036 10/30/2014 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 19.50 "ART WORK SOLD 355955 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 388037 10/30/2014 134955 STANAWAY, NIKKI 253.50 140504 REFUND 355722 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL OVERPAYMENT 1,518.50 140798 REFUND 355722 AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL OVERPAYMENT 1,772.00 388038 10/3012014 134976 STANDARD SIDEWALK INC. 54,171.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 356041 103114 07119.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S119 YORK AVE SIDEWALK W SIDE 62,301.39 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 356041 103114 07123.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK '. 95,921.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 356041 103114 07118.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK 212,394.29 388039 10/30/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 723.32 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 355723 100015061 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 723.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 355723-100015061 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 -01S101 CITY l,. .jINA 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE SERVICE 356042 589396 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Council Check Register by GL 388048 10/30/2014 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary UNIFORM PURCHASE' 355838 102214 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 59.97 .10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 130367 TASC Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388039 10/30/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE Continued... 723.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 355723 100015061 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,170.00 388040 10130/2014 133068 STEEL 'TOE BREWING LLC 10/2'x:_.,14 8:24:45 Page - 33 Business Unit YORK SELLING 126.00 355801 251252 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 126.00 388041 10130/2014 129409 STEEN, BARB 22.10 ART WORK SOLD 355956 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 22.10 388042 10130/2014 101016 STREICHERS 506.98 FZ -GI MOUNTS FOR PW 00004337 356040 11102220BAL 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 506.98 388043 10/30/2014 102639 STROHMYER, TOM ART CENTER REVENUES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 11/6/14 355897 102314 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 388044 10/30/2014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. - 255.00 TIRE DISPOSAL CHARGE 355891 10128792 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 255.00 388045 10/30/2014 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 713.13 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTIONS., 00001828 355892 51736 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 713.13 388046 10/30/2014 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. LITTER REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 653.59 CAP & MCT SERVICES E911 355893 89358 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 653.59 388047 10/30/2014 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 40.00 BEER LINE SERVICE 356042 589396 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 388048 10/30/2014 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN 59.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE' 355838 102214 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 59.97 388049 10/30/2014. 130367 TASC GRILL GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGI5101 CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Council Check Register by GL Page- 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount • Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. Business Unit 388049 1013012014 130357 TASC Continued... 264.00 SEPT 2014 COBRA 355726 IN390114 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 264.00 388050 10130/2014 134963 TC HOMEBUILDERS INC. 2,500.00 ED123063 ESCROW REFUND 355727 5821 NORTHWOOD 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS _ DR 2,500.00 388051 10/3012014 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 306.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 355728 102114 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 308.56 " . 388052 10/3012014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 358.00 355640 00772321 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 89.75 355802 855298 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,061:40 355803 855299 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,509.15 388053 10/3012014 132615 TIMBERLAND HOMES AND REMODELING 197.60 DEPOSIT REFUND 355729 102014 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 197.60 388064 10/30/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 261.00 PARK BOARD MEETING MINUTES 355641 M20848 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 241.00 10/7/14 COUNCIL MTG MINUTES 355642 M20849 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 502.00 - 388055 10130/2014 133540 TOLEU, AMELIA 442:40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 356043 092614 1622.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SKATING & HOCKEY 442.40 " 388056 10/3012014 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 313.00' EQUIPMENT REPAIR 356048 3938 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 728:00. RECORDER 355643 3941 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 1;041:00 388057 1013012014 105243 TUSHIE MONTGOMERYARCHITECTS 1,651.26 50TH REMODEL 355644 214032A -6 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,651.26 i R55CKR2 LuGIS101 CITY G. _MINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 10/30/2014- 10/30/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # . Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388058 1013012014 122321 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC. Continued... 420.00 JETTING /ROOT CUTTING MAIN LINE 355730 49705 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 420.00 JETTING MAINLINE 355731 50596 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 840.00 388059 10/30/2014 114236 USA BLUEBOOK - 430.28 FITTINGS 00001875 355645 470513 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 396.15 TOOLS 00001901 355646 .473580 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 826.43 388060 10/30/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 579.69 WIRE 00001925 355732 8731839 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 579.69 388061 10/30/2014 134659 VOICE & DATA NETWORKS 783.78 MODULES 355733 STDINV133519 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 783.78 MODULES 355.733 STDINV133519 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,567.56 388062 10/3012014 129310 WAGEMAN, JILL 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 355957 102114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 29.25 388063 10130/2014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 272.40 LOCATE LEAK 00001897 355648 5453 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 272.40 388064 10/30/2014 - 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID 191.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 355839 102014 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 191.96 388065 10/30/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 911.60 355986 7002658 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,190.32 355807 7002659 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,101.92 388066 10130/2014 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 1,410.75 WINTER FUNGICIDE 00006253 355894 59733799 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1,410.75 388067 10/30/2014 134960 .WINTER, DARCY 10/2c -14 8:24:45 Page- 35 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION PARKING RAMP PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:24:45 - Council Check Register by GL Page- 36 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/30/2014- 10130/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit "'. 388067 10/30/2014 134960 WINTER, DARCY Continued... 79.94 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355734 5112 INDIANOLA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER`REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET F: AVE 79.94 388068 10130/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,577.28 355814 1080241396 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,411.64 355809 1080242968 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,059.95 355810 1080242969 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 226.27 355808 1080242970 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING ' 5,096.45 355813 1080242971 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR .. YORK SELLING 6,161.05 355811 1080242972 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 88.09 355812 1080242973 5842.5515 "COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 74.30 355816 1080243034 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK,SELLING ' 133.15 355817 1080243035 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ' 2,226.60 355815 1080243036 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16.00- 355818 2080060494 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 88.00- 355819 2080060497 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING '. 50.00- 355820 2080060502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING . 22.50- 355823 2080060523 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 78.00- 355822 2080060538 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 222.68- 355821 2080060621 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING ' 23,577.60 . 388069 10/30/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 3,245.15 355826 1090305438 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING - 246.00 355827 1090305439 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 184.80 355828 1090305440 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 123.00 355825 1090305729 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,977.52 355824 1090305730 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,854.10 355829 1090306489 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 470.00 355831 1090306490 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 46.20 355830 1090306561 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,146.77 388070 10130/2014 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 45,865.50 FRANCE AVETE CONSTRUCTION 355649 10- 01686- 440-9/ 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR - 14 45,865.50 388071 10/ ? ^. "^14 101726 XCEL ENERGY R55CKR2 Li.. -.,101 CITY OF --,.AA 388073 10/30/2014 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary .GUTTER BROOMS 355650 0151750 -IN 10/30/2014— 10/30/2014 BROOMS Check # Date - Amount Supplier /,Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388071 10/30/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 101091 ZIEGLER INC Contlnued... HOSE, COUPLINGS 52.97 51- 5276505 -8 355735, 430889655 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER REPAIR PARTS 8,523.33 51- 6644819 -9 356044 432139458 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER PC001608645 8,576.30 REPAIR PARTS 85.96 FILTERS 388072 10/30/2014 355737 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 10/28/2014 8:24:45 Page - 37 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 269.50 355832 13402 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 269.50 388073 10/30/2014 101672 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 484.50 .GUTTER BROOMS 355650 0151750 -IN 1310.6523 BROOMS _ 484.50 388074 10/30/2014 101091 ZIEGLER INC 55.24 HOSE, COUPLINGS 00005790 355738 PC001608290 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 174.82 FILTERS 00005696 355736 PC001608645 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 85.96 FILTERS 00005697 355737 PC001608646 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 40.41 KEYS 00005699 355895 PC050137508 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 356.43 3,056,377.82 Grand Total P ayment Instrument Totals Checks 2,460,686.05 A/P ACH Payment 595,691.77 Total Payments 3,056,377.82 STREET CLEANING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 10/28/2014 8:25:00 Council Check Summary Page- 1 10/30/2014 - 10/30/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 469,051.Q0 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,865.47 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 221,727.73 02600: ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 616.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,410,097.19 ::04200 .EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 6,988.00. 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,950.63 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,294.04 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 14,328.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 9,030.57 05500 ICEARENAFUND 24,887.45 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 7,524.78 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,284.54 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 936.40 05800 LIQUOR FUND 187,965.29 _ 05900 UTILITY FUND 583,699.07 05930 'STORM SEWER FUND 86,603.97 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 30.30 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 542.50 09900 PAYROLL FUND 10,954.89 Report Totals 3,056,377.82 We confirm to the best of.our knowledge and belief, that these -claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s and proc_dypes site to 3o jo ���� 'rte• ��� To: MAYOR & COUNCIL M ks • �M\ J RVQ • Bee Agenda Item #: IV. C. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Revised 2015 Council Meeting Dates, and Board and Commission Meeting Dates and Dates of Religious Observance Action Requested: Motion approving the 2015 Council meeting dates, the draft calendar of Board and Commission meetings and dates of religious observance. Information / Background: Following the adoption of the 2015 Council meeting, Board and Commission and dates of religious observance, the Edina Transportation Commission moved their October meeting to avoid a conflict with MEA. Staff is resubmitting the 2015 Calendar for Council's consideration. The same days of religious observance will be observed. There also will be no changes to the City Council or other Board or Commission meeting dates. • Good Friday (Christian) —April 3, 2015 • Christmas Eve (Christian) — December 24, 2015 • Evening before and day of Yom Kippur (Jewish) — September 22 & 23; 2015 • Evening before and two days of Rosh Hashanah (Jewish) — September 13 -15, 2015 • Evening before and first two days of Passover (Jewish) — April 3 -5, 2015 • Eid al Fitr (Muslim) —July 17, 2015 • Eid al Adha (Muslim) — September 23, 2015 • The third day of Diwali (Hindu) — November 13, 2015 During 2015, staff is suggesting that the following three City Council meetings be moved: • First August meeting will move to Monday, August 3rd to avoid "Night to Unite" • Second September meeting will move to Monday, September 21St to avoid conflict with Rosh Hashanah & Yom Kippur • First November meeting will move to Monday, November 2nd to avoid Election Day The attached calendar shows with black hash marks all of the days of religious observance that we will avoid hosting any meeting or special event. Typical holidays have been highlighted in yellow. There is also a color coded key of City Council and its various Board and Commission meetings. Board and Commission meetings have all been adjusted to avoid days of religious observance. This calendar will be published for use by staff and the public. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 2015 CITY OF EDINA COUNCIL, ADVISORY BIRDS, COMS. COMMS. MEETINGS, HOLIDAYS ELECTION DATES F] Holidays F] City Council a Nite to Unite F--1 Pln Comm '7� HP Brd Trns Com E:1 Park Brd MMIndicates a religious holiday's observance Elect Day Health Human R/R Com F E& E Comm Arts & Culture Comm JANUARY S M T W T `, F S M T W T 1 2 3 4 5 -1- 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 i'15, 10 17 18 1 19 1 20 21 1 22 1 23 .24 25 26 27 '28 29 30 31 27 28 29 30 30 31 31 APRIL S M T W T F. S 7 8 9 1 2 3`4ti 4 l 6 16 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 31 31 31 31 JULY S M T W T F S. 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 16 8 9 10 11 12 13 ,, 15 16 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 31 31 31 OCTOBER S M T W T F S 7 8 9 � 11. 2 3 4 5 16 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 "- 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 .30 31 FEBRUARY S M T W T F S 1 2 W 4 5 6 7 8 9 � 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1,9 20 21 22 23 1 24 1 25 26 1 27 28 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1,28 1 29 30 31 MAY S M I T W T F S 1 1 3! 4 5 1' 2 3 4 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 i� 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1,28 1 29 30 31 31 AUGUST S M T W T F S 1 1 3! 4 5 6 1 2 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 i� 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ',?,0: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NOVEMBER S M I T W I T F S. 1 1 3! 4 5 6 7 8 9 ,, 11 12 20 14 15 16 17 18 Q 20' 21 22 23 24 .25,. 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 �z1 MARCH S M T W T F S M T. 4 5 6 7 1 W2223 11 12 13 14 7 8 7 18 19' 20 21 15 16 4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 �z1 JUNE S M T. W T F S 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ' 1'8 ' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 �z1 SEPTEMBER S M T. W T F S 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. 10 11 12 1`34 15 16 17 . 18 19' 20 21 22 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 �z1 DECEMBER S M T. W T F S 2 3 4 5 ,6 N21 .9.. 10 11 12 13 15 16 ''1 18 19 20 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 1 -3 �z1 Revised Meeting Schedule for 2015. Dates Subject to Change Revised: 10/24/2014 19).- eA��, rn �A HISS S To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Permanent Easement Agreement at 7235 France Avenue Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign attached permanent easement agreement at 7235 France Avenue, the Macy's property. Information / Background: Please recall at the Aug. 6, 2012, City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012 -102 approving a trailway cooperative agreement with Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail ( NMCRT) from Fred Richards Golf Course to Xerxes Avenue in connection with the Gallagher Drive reconstruction project. The TRPD agreed to fund the installation of the NMCRT along Gallagher Drive in the amount of $150,000 following the receipt of a trailway easement across the Macy's property. This easement allows the NMCRT to traverse across Macy's property to the Edina Promenade. It will also trigger a payment of $150,000 from TRPD. City and TRPD staff continues to draft a license agreement for the portions of the NMCRT within public right -of -ways. It is anticipated that this agreement will be presented to City Council early 2015. Staff recommends City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign attached easement agreement. Attachment: • Grant of Permanent Easement agreement with the property owner of 7235 France Avenue QVWUNFRAMAGENCIES \THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT1Nine Mile Creek Regional TraiREasement Materials \Item IV. D. Mules Easementdooc City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT MACY'S RETAIL, HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto. the CITY OF EIDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State. of Minnesota,. the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a ,permanent easement for public walkway purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated °within the County of Hennepin,. State of Minnesota,. as described on the attached Exhibit. "A" : and depicted - on' the attached Exhibit "B ". INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents; servants, and assigns; to enter upon the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public walkway systems over, across, on, under, and through the easement premises, a together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public walkway easement. 1755080 Grantor "hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. Grantor specifically reserves the right to allow other utility lines to be installed under, across and within the property subject to these: easements, provided such do not interfere with or endanger the k installations °of the City or the maintenance thereof. In making use of the easements granted herein, the City shall and shall cause its contractors to: (i) review the work schedule and traffic control with Grantor's local management to limit any impact of the City's activities on Grantor's business and access ,to Grantor's property,. (ii), make commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any adverse impact to the business operations conducted by Grantor on the adjacent property; (iii) replace and restore any areas and improvements disturbed to the condition they were prior to the performance of such work, 'except for the areas improved by the Grantee in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and raise or lower any and all manholes and/or manhole castings to conform to the elevation of the planters, parking area, driveway and road surfaces in which they are. located; (iv) diligently complete all installations and other work once such activities have begun, and (v) thereafter maintain the City's facilities and related equipment in good order and repair. The City shall not permit any claim,, lien or other encumbrance arising from its activities to accrue against or attach to the easement premises or the interest of Grantor in adjacent property. At all times during construction and other activities, (i) the City will maintain a minimum of one lane vehicular ingress and one lane vehicular egress between France 1755080 Avenue and Grantor's adjacent property via the existing access road on the south side of Grantor's property, and (ii) the City will maintain vehicular ingress and egress over at least one of the two curb cut areas between Grantor's property and the adjacent property to the south during all hours of operation of Grantor's business on such property. The construction period of the easement improvements shall not exceed eight (8) weeks without Grantor's written consent. The easements granted herein are subject to all valid and existing licenses, leases, grants, exceptions, encumbrances, title defects, matters of record, reservations and conditions affecting Grantor's property, including the property subject to these Easements and access thereto. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. The rights .herein granted may not be assigned in whole or in parts without Grantor's reasonable consent. Grantor hereby consents to an assignment or license [continued on following page] 1755080 agreement for the public walkway easement between the Grantee and Three Rivers Park District. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this l day of October, 2014. GRANTOR: MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a Y corporation arl L. Goertemoeller, Senior Vice President 1755080 STATE OF OHIO )ss. COUNTY OF HAMILTON The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on October 2014, by Carl L. Goertemoeller, Senior Vice President of Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., a New York corporation, on behalf of said corporation, Grantor. 1755080 ELIZABETH J. HAASS Notary Public, State of Ohio My commission Expires March 26, 2017 GRANTEE: CITY OF EDINA BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014, by James B. Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651- 452 -5000 RNK /cjh 1755080 E) >E IT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT- EASEIVIENT A 20 foot easement for public walkway purposes over and across that part of Lot 3, Block 7, YORKTOWN according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Lot 3; thence North 0 degrees 13 minutes 38 seconds West, along the west line of said Lot 3 a distance of 24.00 feet to the beginning of said centerline; thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 525.00 feet; thence North 80 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 111.05, feet more or less, to the easterly line of said Lot, 3, and said centerline there terminating. � F � s All Ae— I",, 0� e �y° 0 20 40 Feet 7235 France Ave = 8ft 20ft Existing Property Line Macy's Furniture Gallery � Proposed 20ft Public Trailway Easement f- f =_ Exhibit- B N W E S Engineering Dept January, 2014 ' A o t Le � Cl) • •, �RPOTU��S'p • J as To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. E. From: Chad A. Millner P.E., Director of Engineering Action X❑ Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Engineering Services — Design and Construction Inspection for Lighting and Landscaping Components of the France Avenue Improvements Action Requested: Authorize Engineering Services with WSB, Inc. for Design and Construction Inspection for Lighting and Landscaping Components of the France Avenue Corridor Improvements. Information / Background: The $83,000 proposal is an hourly, not to exceed amount for design and construction inspection services for lighting and landscape components associated with the France Avenue Corridor Improvements. These additional services are required due to the expanded scope of the project. They include increased coordination with area business and construction inspection services during the 3 -year landscaping warranty period. Parts of the continued inspection of the landscaping warranty period may be completed in -house if staffing levels allow. This will be funded by the Centennial Lakes Tax- Increment Financing District funds. WSB has served as the primary engineer for the project and have completed design and construction services. They are well suited to provide these additional services based on their thorough knowledge of the project. Staff recommends authorizing approval the attached proposal. Attachments: Proposal for Landscape and Lighting Construction Administration and Design Services G:1PWICENTRAL SVCSkENG DIVIPROJECTMCONTRACTSUOMENG 14 -14 France Ave_Hazelton Rd Landsape\ADMIN_A.259\MISC \Item IV. E.. WSB Inspection Services Landscaping.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 IS ® Infrastructure o Engineering a Planning o Construction cPi Associates,- Inc. w October 13, 2014 Mr. Chad.Millner, PE Director of Engine_ ring City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina,,MN 55439 Re Landscape and Lighting Construction Administration and Design Proposal``for Engineering Services Cityof Edina, MN 1 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 65416 Tel: 763 5414800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Dear Mr. Millner: WSR & Associates, Inc. (QVSB) are pleased to submit the attached proposal for the Landscaping and Lighting Engineering Services for improvements on France Avenue. These improvements are associated with the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project, but were not included in the original scope of that project. Some of the work associated with this proposal has already been completed.. It should be noted, we attempted to wrap these costs in with the original project but we exceeded the original contract and thus need to request the additional compensation. Two separate plan "sets were created for this work; one for the landscape plan and one for the lighting plan. Each plan required additional time to create and design the plan set, as well as - time for - construction administration and coordinating with businesses.' The landscape plan includes a 3 year maintenance period to ensure sustainability of the landscape elements. This will require reviewing scouting reports and performing site visits to ensure the maintenance is being accomplished. If you have any questions about this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763 -287- 7149. Sincerely, WS 94 ASSOCIATES, INC. Andrew P wman, PE Project Manager Attachments Minneapolis o St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer France twenue Landscape and Lighting Construction Administration and Design Engineering Services SCOPE OF WORK Task 1- Landscape. Design and Plan Set This task included developing concepts for landscaping the corridor. This task evolved over the duration of the project; which included'multiple stakeholder meetings and LHB, the landscape architecture firm developing multiple concepts. Ultimately, a separate plan set was completed by WSB and LHB: Task 2 — Lighting Design and Plan Set This task included developing concepts for the signature lighting along the corridor. It was originally proposed to develop pedestrian level lighting at the corners of the intersections. Due to the emphasis on creating a, signature for the corridor, the concept evolved to a 30' signature light at the intersections of France Avenue & 76th Street, 70th Street and 66th Street: This included a separate plan set to be created for the lighting. Task 3'— Lighting and Landscape Construction Administration This task includes general oversight and observation of the construction of the landscape and lighting plans: This project overlapped with the France Avenue pedestrian improvement plan, which included a full time inspector. The landscape and lighting plan required an extra month of observation. beyond what was required for the pedestrian improvement plan. In.addition, the business liaison coordination also extended for an additional month. Coordination was required to make `certain the property owners: were aware of the improvements and help tie in the proposed landscape with the existing landscape at the property. Task 4 - Landscape Maintenance Period Observation The landscape project includes a 3 year maintenance period for the contractor. This includes submitting scouting reports and performing monthly maintenance. WSB and/or LHB will provide services to make certain the scouting reports are being completed and the maintenance is being performed on the project. It is anticipated the project team will utilize 8 hours per month of observation during the 3 year maintenance period. Proposal — France Avenue Landscape and Lighting City Of Edina ESTIMATED COST The table below shows WSB's estimate of the cost for the work described above. The estimated cost is $88,000: This includes WSB's labor at our standard hourly billing rates. WSB will bill the City for the actual hours worked up to the maximum of $83,000. Total Cost Accepted on this day of , 2014 City of Edina By: Scott Neal, Its Executive Director Proposal — France Avenue page 2 Landscape and Lighting . City Of Edina Tasks. Project Cost Task 1— Landscape Design and Plan Set $9,000 Task'2 — Lighting Design and Plan $8,000 Task 3 — Lighting and Landscape Construction Administration $37,000 Task 4 - Landscape Maintenance Period Observation $29,000 $83,000_ Total Cost Accepted on this day of , 2014 City of Edina By: Scott Neal, Its Executive Director Proposal — France Avenue page 2 Landscape and Lighting . City Of Edina O e :Fa - • ,��RPORn��O • lass To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. F. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 .Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Engineering Services for Valley View Road — Final Design and Construction Administration Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Engineering Services with WSB, Inc. Information / Background: Please recall City Council conducted the public improvement hearing and approved the referenced project at the Oct. 21 City Council meeting. The project limits are McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace. The project is scheduled for reconstruction in 2015. This segment of Valley View Road is designated as a MNDOT State Aid Roadway (MSA). The project includes reconstruction of approximately 1,800 -ft of road, utility improvements, and installation of pedestrian improvements including sidewalks and bike lanes. Stakeholder input will continue to be conducted with the residents adjacent to the roadway as detailed in the attached proposal. The project will be funded by a combination of MSA funds, special assessments, PACS and utility funds. The fee for final design and construction administration is $209,992. Staff recommends authorizing the engineering services detailed in the attachment. Attachments: • Engineering Proposal for Final Design and Construction Administration for Valley View Road GAI'VACENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTMCONTRACTSMIMENG 15-1 Valley View Rd\BA377 VV Rd fr McCauley- Braemar(Halrpin)\ADMIN\MISC \Item IV. F. Engineering Services - Final Design Construction Admin For Valley View Road.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 WSW & iisstiainles; lnc: Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction October 28, 2014 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Valley View Road Final Design and Construction Administration Proposal for Engineering Services City of Edina, MN Dear Mr. Millner: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) are pleased to submit the attached proposal for the Final Design and Construction Administration Engineering Services for improvements on Valley View Road. The total for this work is $209,992.00. This includes $76,348.00 for final design, $13,180.00 for landscape design and $120,464.00 for construction administration. We are eager and ready to start the next phase of this project. If you have any questions about this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763 - 287 -7149. Sincerely, WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. I?ruAr"- Andrew Plowman, PE Project Manager Attachments Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer Valley View Road Final Design and Construction Administration Engineering Services SCOPE OF WORK Task 1— Final Design 1.1 Property Owner Meetings: This task includes meeting with individual property owners that live adjacent to the project. We will send out a letter describing the project and allow the property owners an opportunity to meet with the project team to help coordinate aspects of the project and avoid unknowns during design. 1.2 Utility Coordination Process: This task includes following the MnDOT utility coordination process. WSB will lead a meeting with the private utilities. The existing utilities will be shown in the plan set and WSB will coordinate with the private utilities to ensure conflicts are avoided, if possible, or relocated. 1.3 Roundabout Justification Report: WSB will complete the roundabout justification report (RJR) for the Valley View Road/Braemar Boulevard intersection, which is required for the State Aid submittal. The RJR will include the necessary traffic data and modeling, in addition to the roundabout truck turning movements and fast path analysis. 1.4 Variance Submittal and Meeting: WSB will assist City Staff in submitting the variance request to State Aid for the December variance meeting, for the Valley View Road curve near Comanche Court. WSB will also attend the variance meeting. 1.5 Alignments, Profiles and Cross Section: This task includes finalizing the geometric design for the project based on the approved engineering report. 1.6 Storm Sewer Design: This task includes the storm sewer design for Valley View Road based on state aid standards. In addition, the Sally Lane storm sewer pipe will be designed. It is anticipated Barr Engineering will revise the existing City model after the project is complete. 1.7 Plan Preparation (State Aid Plans): WSB will complete the final design plans for the project in order to successfully get the project approved for State Aid funding and bid the project no later than March, 2015. 1.8 Bid Preparation, Permits and Specifications: WSB will compile all the applicable specifications for the project which includes the City Standard specifications and all necessary special provisions. WSB will submit all necessary permits; including the Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit and the NPDES permit. WSB will answer contractor's questions during bidding and complete the bid tabulation. Proposal — Valley View Road Page 1 Final Design and Construction Administration City Of Edina Task 2 — Landscape Design 2.1 Conceptual Design: WSB's landscape design unit will develop alternatives for a conceptual landscape for the roundabout area. A questionnaire and/or newsletter will be sent to the residents to provide information and possibly solicit feedback from the residents regarding the landscape concepts. The final concepts will be presented to City staff for approval. 2.2 Landscape Plan: WSB will complete a separate plan set for the landscape design. It is intended to bid the landscape plan separately from the roadway plan due to the 3 year maintenance period that is required with the landscape plan. 2.3 Bid Preparation and Specifications: WSB will compile all the applicable specifications for the project which includes the City Standard specifications and all necessary special provisions. This task also includes completing the maintenance period specifications. Task 3 — Construction Administration 3.1 Weekly Meetings: WSB will lead the weekly meetings, including the preconstruction meeting. It is assumed the project will be a 14 week construction project. WSB will complete the meeting minutes and distribute to the attendees from each meeting. 3.2 Administration, Pay Vouchers, Change Orders, etc.: This task includes all the necessary administration items related to the construction administration with the contractor. All change orders will need to be submitted and approved at MnDOT State Aid, WSB will be responsible' to obtain approval. WSB will generate the pay vouchers and separate the quantities based on the funding splits developed with the final plans. WSB will complete weekly City Extra text which will be posted by City staff. 3.3 Construction Observation: WSB will provide one full -time observer to be on -site during the duration of the project. It is assumed the project will include a 14 week construction schedule. The observer will answer contractor and resident questions and relay all necessary information to the project manager and City staff. 3.4 Staking: This task includes staking the project per the design. This includes offsets for the storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main items as well as offsets for the curb and gutter construction. WSB will also provide blue tops for the subgrade. 3.5 As- built: Upon completion of the project, WSB will survey the location the actual inverts and top of castings of the existing structures and complete an as -built plan, based on City standards. Proposal — Valley View Road Page 2 Final Design and Construction Administration City Of Edina ESTIMATED COST The table below shows a summary of WSB's estimate. of the cost for the work.described above. The estimated cost is`$209,992. This includes WSB's labor at our standard hourly billing rates. WSB will bill the City for the actual hours worked up to the maximum of $209,992. A detailed' breakdown of the hours can be found on the following page. 'asks Project Cost Task 1 - Final Design $76,348 Task 2 — Landscape Design $13,180 Task .3 — Construction Administration $120,464 Total Cost $209,992 Valley View Road Final Design and Construction Administration Detailed Cost Breakdown of Tasks A . WSB �lir► 6 Atmcbvle, !nF Task Description Principal Project Manager Design Engineer Observer Traffic /Lighting Engineer 2 Person Survey Crew CAD Tech / GIS Clerical Total Hours Cost 1.0 Final Design 1.1 Property Owner Meetings 1.2 Utility Coordination Process 1.3 Roundabout Justification tion Report 1.4 Variance Submittal and Meeting 1.5 Alignments, Profiles and Cross Sections 1.6 Storm Sewer Design 1.7 Plan Preparation (State A1d Plans) 1.8 Bid Pre aratlon, Permits and Specifications 4 2 8 4 24 16 16 12 24 16 92 24 SO 24 8 4 24 40 96 12 40 16 8 4 8 42 $4,644.00 44 $4,872.00 64 $7,592.00 6 24 $2,868.00 20 4 96 $10,800.00 32 88 $9,040.00 80 16 276 $30,056.00 2.0 Landscape Design �v r 218 68 0 13 8 28 60 694 $6,476.00 $76,348.00 2.1 Conceptual Design 2.2 Landca a Plan 2.3 Bid Pre aratlon and S eclfcations 2 8 8 4 16 24 24 1 1 16 42 $4,460.00 16 48 $4,880.00 3.0 Construction Admmistration 2 20 b4 32 16 16 44 $3,840.00 134 $13,180.00 3.1 Weekly Meetings 3.2 Administration, Pay Vouchers, Change Orders, Etc. 3.3 Construction Observation 3.4 Staking 2 20 48 6 20 36 840 4 4 50 $5,900.00 16 100 $10,728.00 846 $76,392.00 3.5 As- Builts 12 24 100 100 $17,100.00 2 86 920 1 24 24 84 $10,344.00 4 1 128 1 24 1 16 1 11180 $120 464.00 Hourly LOSES -S150.01::I::::I $132.00 $90.00 $119.00 $171.00 $104.00 $72.00 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: November 3, 2014 Subject: Resolution No. 2014-114 Lot Division, 5320 Kelsey Terrace. Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. w91�11 ]BOB OB Agenda Item M IV.G. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: Mr. David Hendel on behalf of the property owners Paul and Jean Mooty is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the property at 53240 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of the Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. Both properties are owned by the Mootys. The purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line to the north to make room for an addition to the existing home. The Outlot appears to be a leftover remnant of Parkwood Knolls 26th addition that ended up being platted as an Outlot. The Outlot originally appears as part of Lot 26 in the Preliminary Plat. (See plat on pages A6 -A7 of the Planning Commission Staff Report.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On October 22, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Lot Division. Vote: 4 Ayes and I Nay. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014-114 • Minutes of the October 22, 2014 Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Staff Report, October 22, 2014 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50" St - Edina, MN 55424 U) RESOLUTION NO. 2014-114 City of Edina APPROVING A LOT DIVISION AT 5320 KELSEY TERRACE AND OUTLOT B PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mr. David Hendel on behalf of the property owners Paul and Jean Mooty, is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the property at 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of the Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. Both properties are owned by the Mootys. 1.02 The purpose of the'request is to shift the side lot line to the north to make room for an addition to the existing home. 1.03 The Outlot appears to be .a leftover remnant of Parkwood Knolls 26th addition, that ended up being platted as an Outlot. The Outlot originally appears as part of Lot 26 in the Preliminary 1.04 1.05 Plat. The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lot 1, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 14th Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota; and Outlot B, Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.04_ On October 22, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot division on a Vote of 4 -1. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 2. Several lot divisions have been approved by the City on this block. City Hall 3. There would be no change to the footprint or mass of the existing duplex. 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Y RESOLUTION NO. 2014-114 Page Two Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Lot Division of 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of the Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated prior to filing of the approving resolution with Hennepin County. Adopted this _ day of , 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk Exhibit A S` 3ao Ley Te ( f PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADOIT /ON, and that parr` of Outlot B, PARMOOD KNOLLS 267H ADDITION, which lies southwesterly of aline drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the easterly line of said Outlot 9, as shown oa said PARMOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot B, (as measured along said easterly line omof '� That part of Outlot B, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, which lies northeasterly of a line drawn from the most northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, to a point on the easterly line of said Outlot B, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot B, (as measured along said easterly line). Commissioner Hobbs stated in his opinion its good that the City provides residents with a sidewalk facilities plan. Commissioners and Chair Staunton agreed, adding it provides transparency. Motion Commissioner Olsen movedxapproval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Sidewalk and Bike Facilities' Plan. Commissioner Carr seconded -the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Staunton reiterated he supports the amendment.,- adding transparency is important and the Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan provides that transparency. Staunton further noted all proposed sidewalks will be noticed by the City and heard by the City Council for review'and approval. This also provides residents with the ability to share their concerns or support for sidewalks in their area. ��)• • *II. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS ZZI A. Lot Division. David Hendel. 5320 Kelsey Terrace, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague reported that Mr. David Hendelon behalf of,the property owners Paul and Jean Mooty, is' requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the property at 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of the Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. Both properties are owned by the Mootys. The,purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line to the north to make room for an addition to the existing home. The Outlot appears to be a leftover, remnant of Parkwood Knolls 26th addition, that ended up being platted as an Outlot The Outlot originally appears as part of Lot 26 in the Preliminary Plat. Planner Teague concluded t that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of Parkwood Knolls 261h Addition subject to the following findings; 1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The Outlot and 5320 Kelsey Terrace are both held under the same ownership. The properties appear to be one lot. 3. The existing utilities on the Outlot would not be impacted. Approval is also subject to the following condition: 1. The existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated prior to filing of the approving resolution with Hennepin County. Discussion Commissioners questioned why minor lot line rearrangements and party wall divisions can't be accomplished administratively. Teague explained that at this time Code requires Commission and Council review. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion the lot should be combined as one lot; not continue as two. Teague responded that would require a re- platting and at this time the property owner has requested this action. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Hobbs seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Olsen, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton. Nay; Lee. Motion carried. o e �J �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague October 22, 2014 VII.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. David Hendel on behalf of the property owners Paul and Jean Mooty, is requesting to. shift the existing lot line that divides the property at 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of the Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. (See property location on pages Al —A3.) Both properties are owned by -the Mootys: The purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line to the north to make room for an addition.to the existing home. (See the proposed lot line shift on pages A4 —A5.) The Outlot appears to be a leftover remnant of Parkwood Knolls 26th addition, that ended up being platted as an Outlot. The Outlot originally appears as part of Lot 26 in the Preliminary Plat. (See plat on pages A6 -A7.) Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding properties and land uses include single- family homes (See pages Al —A3.) Existing Site Features Single- family home and vacant Outlot. Planning Guide -Plan designation: Low- density residential Zoning: R -1, Single- family residential Primary Issue _ is_the proposed _lot -division -reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. The division makes the existing lot at 5320 Kelsey Terrace slightly larger from 20,528 square feet to 22,201 square feet. The adjacent Outlot goes from 8,016 square feet to 6,343 square feet. There is a.26 -inch storm sewer that runs through the Outlot. This storm sewer.line. would remain. (See pages A4 -A5.) There is a -5 -foot drainage and utility easement running along, the side lot line that would need, to be vacated prior to any building addition being built. It is believed that there are no utility lines located .within the easement. If there are, they would need to be relocated on to the Outlot. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The Outlot and 5320 Kelsey Terrace are both held under the same ownership. The properties appear to be one lot. 3. The existing utilities on the Outlot would not be impacted. Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. The existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated prior to filing of the approving resolution with Hennepin County. Deadline for a city decision: November 18, 2014 2 ,4949 t=— W i !_ i t I Ii 6321 l s t �. 7 a _ CD, �y 7,35 f — I ! t' S050 z� �j 24" . W ❑ 111 I� OQCi M1 � r � Via= Li S021 I I L- 50d 5010 7Z5 i � _ 1 t' �� °-� 5025 5012LLi 5104 t'`' I 51001 � �- K ,� 5161 `' 5108 5109 ' 'v"' 15113 l / -� 30 -V510 .5 51,1'2 _ _ I' �/ f c, 5117 _ 5117 �-- - 5136 -' S12Q 15125 5152 5125 1 _.:51,24 ., - j '' 5206 -5201, 6 32, I' 17, '5241 E ! t � ��. ;���. �'.'� �_ m -�� � ,. �--- �- •- -.._ i �Qf ,,� }�, ��FAOU►a if` '� a ^~ 5224 ❑I "`- X3 ' 1 1` j x29 -0— I 4A 5224 f �° rEVArr stivo kI r raj r-'- r— T kLEI�S All TRAI1, �i r �pgLC04V WIOOQ_ R AU / ES LV009aO,UR 1 1 6400, I 24 -"�i ` _ = T64 041 1 5404, 'p •RK%,NO D - s 24 1 � U 5401 `H 55 r—` _ 1 ? —�\ 5501s ,- ' t ��✓o� ' - �f �' �6f20) �� a -- 5508 ' so � ' (6604' :6504 ,,!P,� �I / -r 5501 :5500 n ( } STAUDERCIRCLE "K, ,-- �FfELD -�`" -" r } i'_ 7S720 00 2a Y f. D OVRFDRI_V_E _ --- -f _ , ,cr -,_r fj •,� . /1`,' `� -I�f. I I_ +��' Wo Parcel 30- 117 -21 -13 -0090 A -T -B: Torrens Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. N ID' Print Date: 10/17/2014 Owner S Bergeson & S L Bergeson Market Name: Total: Parcel 4904 Prescott Cir Tax Address: Edina, MN 55436 Total: Property Residential Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home - Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Non- Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.24 acres Sale .. . Area: 10,555 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Whk Green /Tl 6629 - Parcel ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel Area: _ - 5409 _ I - - 5404 5404 A -T -B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: A '�- Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 10/17/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 LA Think Green'. �� 4 � C �I u � _ 5225 5214 I j� 5211 ` . . 5226 i 5215 5160 5170 \� `., - -- O --� 6654 5200 5245 5218 li it �`t 1 1 6656 - -- 5250 5223 5219 6656 r 5265 24 6512 6508 I 6504 I - -- - -- - - I 5222 _ -_ - - 5156 /� i 1 5186 5227 5231 6629 - Parcel ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel Area: _ - 5409 _ I - - 5404 5404 A -T -B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: A '�- Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 10/17/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 LA Think Green'. 5285 5300 ` . . 5226 - - -- - 6652 a - 6650 6654 5305 �� 6656 �� 5230 � 5234 5238 — - 6656 - _ 24 6512 6508 I 6504 I 6500 6641. 6645 /� I _ — - -- -_ 1NILL0IN =WOOD ROAD- 6649 -� -- — — - - -- 6517 i I ` 1 6511 6509 6505 6501 1 6637 1'' 6653 ti 5401 I Z4 5400 \� 5405 5400 6633 1 6629 - Parcel ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel Area: _ - 5409 _ I - - 5404 5404 A -T -B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: A '�- Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 10/17/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 LA Think Green'. 43 N EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADD17ION ALSO OUTLOT 5,, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION and that port of Outlot 8, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, which lies southwesterly of o line drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the easterly line of said Outlot 9,, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, dlstont 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot 9,, (as measured along said easterly line). PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT: An easement- for droinoge and utility purposed over, under and across those ports of Lot 1, 8 1ock 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION and Outlot B, Remnant Outlot B, AREA: 6,343.0 Sq !4057 NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDRLON PARKWR KNOLLS 26TH AD01110N, lying within a 5.00 foot strip of property the northeasterly line of which drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the easterly line of said Outlot 8, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet y` northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot 8, (as measured o%ng said easterly line. ~ PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION. That easement for droinoge and utility purposes, over 1 and across Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION., -os dedicated on said plot of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION. 5320 KELSEY TERRACE EDINA, MN 55436 I hereby certify that this aurveyo plan report prepared by m° `DEMARS-GABRIEL r under ny tllreet uWervision tl that I a duly Registerod Lontl sureeyar u der the La a of the state ar Minnesota. LAND SURVEYORS INC. On WA9@N.MR M 9 209 oadd E c,aak Ed;-. NN 541.)9 . m.? 541.761-0161 . rvs 4�rsi-tw90 Date: September a, 2074 -Aron. Reg. N. 22414 Ft. Ft. c Ft. .a�'°� 56 Ft. Ft. 9IMS \ \ \ Buildings 2,856.3 Sq.Ft. R =43.15 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. A =11 °45'38" —150 Sq.Ft. AREAS: PROV-LISZO LOT DIVISI Y - F�R OVERALL PARCEL _ AREA: 28,544.5 Sq % of Coverage Lot ,1, Block 2, AREA: 20,528.0 Sq PJT ®�I 4 Y O ®Td Sq /jI /j/]17 .Q.i C/lJ /JT�/J17 /] /�j C dYlJSILdJl %J/7 9CLl New "Building Parc e" AREA: 22,2016.0 Sq N EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADD17ION ALSO OUTLOT 5,, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION and that port of Outlot 8, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, which lies southwesterly of o line drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the easterly line of said Outlot 9,, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, dlstont 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot 9,, (as measured along said easterly line). PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT: An easement- for droinoge and utility purposed over, under and across those ports of Lot 1, 8 1ock 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION and Outlot B, Remnant Outlot B, AREA: 6,343.0 Sq !4057 NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDRLON PARKWR KNOLLS 26TH AD01110N, lying within a 5.00 foot strip of property the northeasterly line of which drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the easterly line of said Outlot 8, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet y` northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot 8, (as measured o%ng said easterly line. ~ PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION. That easement for droinoge and utility purposes, over 1 and across Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION., -os dedicated on said plot of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION. 5320 KELSEY TERRACE EDINA, MN 55436 I hereby certify that this aurveyo plan report prepared by m° `DEMARS-GABRIEL r under ny tllreet uWervision tl that I a duly Registerod Lontl sureeyar u der the La a of the state ar Minnesota. LAND SURVEYORS INC. On WA9@N.MR M 9 209 oadd E c,aak Ed;-. NN 541.)9 . m.? 541.761-0161 . rvs 4�rsi-tw90 Date: September a, 2074 -Aron. Reg. N. 22414 Ft. Ft. c Ft. .a�'°� 56 Ft. Ft. 9IMS \ \ \ Buildings 2,856.3 Sq.Ft. R =43.15 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. A =11 °45'38" —150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. Total Coverage 3,898.6 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. % of Coverage = 13.6 % / 6 a h ERLY CORNER OF OOTLOT 0' _oOST N0115 26TH ADDITION EXISTING HARDCOVER Buildings 2,856.3 Sq.Ft. Patios & Decks 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. Deck & Patio Allowance —150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. Total Coverage 3,898.6 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. % of Coverage = 13.6 % o Derotes iron monument ® Derotes found monument x 000.0 Derotes existing elev. (000.0) Derotes proposed elev. Derotes surface; draina e 142370 g Book -Page NOTE: ADDITION- TO MATCH EXISTIIG FLOOR ELEVATIONS ,§c-a David Men del CoDstrue tl oll, LLC PROPOSED HARDCOVER Buildings 3,213.3 Sq.Ft. Patios & Decks 1. J42.3 Sq.Ft. Deck & Patio Allowance —150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. Total Coverage 4,255.6 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. % of Coverage = 14.9 E a , a r a. t a w — U LL EL N EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION ALSO OUTLOT B, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, and that part of Outlot B, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, which lies southwesterly of o line drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a Po /nt on the easterly line of said Outlot B, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot B, has measured along said easterly line). ', PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT: An easement for drainage and utility purposed over, under and across those ports of Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, and Outlot B, rA PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, lying within a 5.00 foot strip of property the northeasterly line of which !s u \ drown from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a paint on the easterly line of said Outlot B, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet y` northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot B, (as measured along said easterly line). PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION: That easement for drainage and utility purposes, over and across Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION., as dedicated on said plat of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION. c� 5320 KELSEY TERRACE EDINA, MN 55436 o Q� o z DEAlARS- GABRIEL AREAS: PROMUSL'II LOT DIVISION FOR 6875 WA9ANgIV! AK W. OVERALL PARCEL AREA: 28,544.5 Sq. Ft. \ - Mm.((ss55�� 76) -Wdl - rat (est) 767 -N90 Lot 1, Block 2, AREA: 20,528.0 Sq. Ft. \ �/° T ®�j T �j NOI Y I��l \ /� PAUL Q� elf V dN� I CE New "Building Paorc e" AREA: 22,2016.0 Sq. Ft. N EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION ALSO OUTLOT B, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, and that part of Outlot B, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, which lies southwesterly of o line drawn from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a Po /nt on the easterly line of said Outlot B, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot B, has measured along said easterly line). ', PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT: An easement for drainage and utility purposed over, under and across those ports of Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, and Outlot B, rA PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, lying within a 5.00 foot strip of property the northeasterly line of which !s u \ drown from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, to a paint on the easterly line of said Outlot B, as shown on said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION, distant 21.89 feet y` northerly of the most southerly corner of said Outlot B, (as measured along said easterly line). PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION: That easement for drainage and utility purposes, over and across Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION., as dedicated on said plat of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION. Remnant Outlot B. AREA: 6,343.0 Sq. Ft. \ Aj \ \\ MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION I I /, 14237C Book -Page t " =20' a Derotes iron monument ® Derotes found monument x 000.0 Derotes existing elev. (000.0) DerDteS proposed elev. Derotes surfoce'drainage NOTE ADDITION TO MATCH EXISTIIG FLOOR ELEVATIONS I1avld Mendel Cnstruetjw LLC R =43.15 A =11 °4538" L =8.84 O CORNER OF Oaal B, S 20 AODPN . EXISTING HARDCOVER Buildings 2,856.3 Sq.Ft. Patios & Decks 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. Deck & Patio Allowance -150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. 3,898.6 Sq.Ft. 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. = 13.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER Buildings 3,213.3 Sq.Ft. Patios & Decks 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. Deck & Patio Allowance —150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. Total Coverage 4,255.6 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. % of Coverage = 14.9 c� 5320 KELSEY TERRACE EDINA, MN 55436 I hereby certify !ho! thte sur _ plan apart prepercd by ma DEAlARS- GABRIEL untlar my duce! upervlsion d that Ir a duly Registe ed Land Su -or under Ne Laws of the State . f ,__t.. LAND SURVEYORS, INC.�� 6875 WA9ANgIV! AK W. S 7a8 Dex'd E. beak Edinw NN "'M - Mm.((ss55�� 76) -Wdl - rat (est) 767 -N90 Date: September 4, 2014 AC Reg. No. 22474 Remnant Outlot B. AREA: 6,343.0 Sq. Ft. \ Aj \ \\ MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION I I /, 14237C Book -Page t " =20' a Derotes iron monument ® Derotes found monument x 000.0 Derotes existing elev. (000.0) DerDteS proposed elev. Derotes surfoce'drainage NOTE ADDITION TO MATCH EXISTIIG FLOOR ELEVATIONS I1avld Mendel Cnstruetjw LLC R =43.15 A =11 °4538" L =8.84 O CORNER OF Oaal B, S 20 AODPN . EXISTING HARDCOVER Buildings 2,856.3 Sq.Ft. Patios & Decks 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. Deck & Patio Allowance -150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. 3,898.6 Sq.Ft. 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. = 13.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER Buildings 3,213.3 Sq.Ft. Patios & Decks 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. Deck & Patio Allowance —150 Sq.Ft. Entry Allowance 3( -50) —150 Sq.Ft. Total Coverage 4,255.6 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 28,544.5 Sq.Ft. % of Coverage = 14.9 lorN PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26th ADDITION 1 - -J -t-lli � 1 IN I: SG SSI:• � � , 1 rI• "" I 1 ,II r 1 1 / r --- J �• 1 � 1 14 d. 1 - -7 TRAL lEln1A1E( t✓ --------------------- 1 CH cou" \, I I 1 1 1 1 r- 1 1 1 =3; : ".... • I- - - - - -J L ----- J 1 - -J -t-lli � 1 IN I: SG SSI:• � � , 1 rI• "" I 1 ,II r 1 r •1. 1 I --� i rr- - - - - -1 r --- J �• ; 14 d. 1 - -7 TRAL lEln1A1E( t✓ --------------------- 1 - - - - - ---- \, I f•Lw� 1 1 r- 1 1 1 =3; : ".... • I- - - - - -J L ----- J T. \, 1 1 , 1 I I 17A 1 1 1 1 1 \ ' 1 1 1 17 . / / 1 • 1 E 1 -------- � 1a - r = f71E�/ r mis C7 j 1 1 1 1 � 1 \ r �-41� 1 Boger A. Anderson & A9sociattM Inc. ..,. - - - -- r -Eii- aw w%0 N9. c PARKWOOD KNOLLS 267H EDINA. MINNESOTA HANSEN COMPANIES Slit PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 OF 8 1 1 1 ,II r 1 , 1 1 1 I , TRAL lEln1A1E( t✓ --------------------- T. \, 1 1 , 1 I I 17A 1 1 1 1 1 \ ' 1 1 1 17 . / / 1 • 1 E 1 -------- � 1a - r = f71E�/ r mis C7 j 1 1 1 1 � 1 \ r �-41� 1 Boger A. Anderson & A9sociattM Inc. ..,. - - - -- r -Eii- aw w%0 N9. c PARKWOOD KNOLLS 267H EDINA. MINNESOTA HANSEN COMPANIES Slit PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 OF 8 PARKWOOD KNO 26th ADDITION LLS - 1 1 I I I �V I I I I I j CHALICE COURT f- I i 1 � � 1 1• 1 II I I I s f I -:7 I �1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I For, 11 1 1 1 1 \ 1 A \` oa\ -J"o^. z 1 �• tL 1 D 1 1 ; ` 1 N 1 I 1 it po,a GREEN FARMS 1 1 1� 1 •I I II • I \,-'gMALLOW WOOD R am`- � ---------------- A STE LOCATION YAP =m " =mma ro111M mmlWUM moom on ®mm® mo�mm® mOmmm® mmmmmo mo ®omo mm115=3 mm�mm® mm ®mmm mm ®mmm=l MmomEm�mo R m 0=om mmoo mmIN=mm= mmmmm© mommmo OD ®gym mW7m mom® At NORTH OMNER/DEVELOPER: HANSEN COMPANIES 5058 w1COLN DRIVE. SUITE 480 EDINA. 11N 55138 (952) 912 -9895 ENGINEER: ANDERSON ENONEERNG OF MINNESOTA. LLC 134W 159, AVE N. SLATE R PLY60UTK 101 55111 ROGER ANDERSON (763) 38011084 SURVEYQi: EGAK FIELD Q NOT/AK 7415 WAYLATA GLV6. SUITE 200 101111EAPOUS, WIN 55426 JACK OWE (952) 548 -6677 WETLAND SPEOAUST: APPLIED ENMRON4¢NTAL SERNIM 13400 15th AVE N. SATE R PLYMOUTH. UN 55441 WAYNE E JACOBSON (763) 353 -I084 1FGAL MSrR!PRON: WROT h PAR — -0- xslN AmITIVA Alm WIL01 1. PNaM9m RNQLS 1sM •9Pnv. (-1 Jo- 111 -21 -J4 -0610 •ro SITE DATA: [-3 EUIWG . R -1 TOTAL 0.501 RIBA . 1,.l0..1] Sr (]).50 •035) TOTAL R/R AR[A . A2.N9 4 TOTAL LOT MA . 1.19[.1[0 S (SC[ LOT —ART) OUTIOT AREA - 56:6 4 TOTAL O M - W LPN. wT MA - 9000 AT 1W1. wr MDIN (e sl6Aal - l5• 14K WT W. - 120• SE BAQS RrollT - 00 000450 / STREET - 33 9TE BOPOMY ANp IAR4FiM 9pIKY BY [WN, (pD R NpRNt 9p,[1015 lamx PRR9W0+ P, A rn99oR cW1Ra 1aAN J PR69W1MT uw1 " . -4 N160W1MT PLAN A PROFRE .1. —[1 rwRE a MRANO L— T— Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH .A. PRELMINARY PLAT wa EDINA, MINNESOTA HANSEN COMPANIES s WAW1°105°1 ° MOFR F S % _ o+rt mm N6 712E ti _� <.-,�� To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: N.H. Revised From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Action Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -116 Approving Agreement for School Resource Officer - Services — City of Edina and Edina Public Schools Action Requested: Motion adopting Resolution No. 2014-116 authorizing the City of Edina to continue its participation with the Edina School District for School Resource Officer Services. Information / Background: The Edina Police Department has a current agreement with the Edina School District to provide school resource officer services. Agreement entered into July I, 2014. Attachments: Resolution Copy City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 AGREEMENT FOR SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SERVICES CITY OF EDINA AND EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOL This Agreement is made and entered into this 01St day of July. 2014 by the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 ( "City") and Edina Public Schools, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located at 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, Minnesota 55424 ( "District "). WHEREAS, the parties enter into this Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 126C.44; WHEREAS, the City and District are interested in a mutually - beneficial partnership to provide services for the students of the District; WHEREAS, the City and District would like to optimize efficiencies to curb juvenile delinquency and crime; WHEREAS, the City and District would like to continue to improve understanding and promote respect between the police; the District, its employees and students; and community; WHEREAS, the City provides School Resource Officer services for schools; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of both parties to make provision for School Resource Officer services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual covenants expressed herein, the City and District agree to the terms and conditions outlined herein: I. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY A. Qualifications of Personnel. The City agrees to provide two state licensed police officers to perform full - time services to the District for the purpose of assisting in the establishment and coordination of a cooperative community approach among the District's schools, students, parents, police, and other community resources to address the needs of the District, students, and community members. B. Service. The City's School Resource Officers' services will include but not be limited to: prevention of delinquency, protection of life and property, law enforcement, serving as a communication link between the City and District, and participation in meetings as requested by building administration. The City will provide required clothing, uniform, and vehicles necessary to perform required services. C. Place of Performance. The City will perform services at schools located within District, being primarily located at the District's secondary schools. Occasionally services may be performed at venues outside of the District. D. Documentation Pertaining to Services. The City must provide to the District any and all records pertaining to the provision of services at the end of its services. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION E. Insurance. 1. The City will maintain at its sole expense valid policies of general liability insurance, covering the negligent acts or omissions of the City acting through its directors, agents, employees or other personnel, which may give rise to liability under this Agreement. 2. The City will maintain, at its sole expense, Workers' Compensation insurance for its employees. Page 3 3. The parties' liabilities are limited by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Ch. 466 and other applicable laws. F. Payment of Employees. The City, as the employer, will remain responsible for the payment of wages and other compensation, reimbursement of expenses and compliance with Federal, State and local tax Withholdings, Workers'. Compensation, Social Security, employment and other insurance requirements for its employees. G. District Policies and Procedures. The City and its assigned officers will consider the District's policies and procedures while providing services in the school setting unless they are inconsistent with the Police Department's policies.. District policies may be found on the District's website. H. Data Privacv. The City, while performing services under this Agreement, must comply with the ,Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. §1232g and rules and regulation promulgated thereunder, as they apply to the District regarding the treatment of all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, and /or disseminated by the District by this Agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the City's release of data governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. The parties understand and agree that sharing of data between them must occur in accordance with the law governing the dissemination of data, including, but not limited to, specific laws governing the sharing of data on students and minors. It is understood that student information, in general, is classified as private data under the - Minnesota `Government Data Practices Act. II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DISTRICT Payment for Services. The District will remain responsible to provide payment to the City for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Section III hereunder will govern billing terms and compensation. A. Insurance. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 1. The District will maintain at its sole expense valid policies of general liability insurance, covering the negligent acts or omissions of the District acting through its'directors, agents, employees or other personnel, which may give rise to liability under this Agreement. 2. The District will maintain, at its sole expense, Workers' Compensation insurance for its employees. 3. The parties' liabilities are limited by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Ch. 466 and other applicable laws. C. Equipment and Supplies. The District will provide the School Resource Officers with workspace, access to its network, and other District -owned technologies, at the discretion of the District. D. Employee Assignment. The District has the authority to reject an assigned School Resource Officer for any nondiscriminatory reason and request the assignment of another School Resource Officer. E. Service and1rainine. The District recognizes there may be occasions that the School Resource Officer may need to respond to emergency calls, attend police training and other special duties as assigned by the City while fulfilling his or her role as a School Resource Officer for the District. The District may request that the S h of Resource officer attend District trainings during his.or her performance of services under this Agreement. F. Feedback on Performance of Officer. At the conclusion of each fiscal year, the Director of Community Education Services will provide the City with feedback on the performance of the School Resource Officer.' In addition, the District will notify the City within two business days of any performance concerns or allegations of inappropriate conduct of the officer. The City retains all disciplinary authority over its officers. G. Provision of Records. The District will provide the School Resource Officers with all necessary records and information relevant to the student(s) for the purposes of the service(s) being provided. III. BILLING FOR SERVICES A. The District agrees to compensate the City at a rate of $90,000 per annum for services provided. under this Agreement. If for any reason services are not performed for the duration of the school year, the City will prorate the compensation to reflect served time. B. The City will bill the District for such services after July 15` for services performed during the prior school year. C. The District agrees to pay submitted bills within sixty days of receipt by the District. Any bill not paid within the sixty day period can be considered delinquent by the City. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION IV. TERM AND TERMINATION Page 5 The initial term of this Agreement is from July 01St, 2014 and will remain in effect through June 30th, 2015. This Agreement shall automatically renew on July 1St of each year ( "renewal period ") for up to five years unless the District or City determine that adequate funding is not provided by the Minnesota legislature and /or parties to this Agreement. Notice of inadequate funding must be provided to the other party at least 60 days prior to the termination date of this Agreement or 60 days prior to the end of any renewal period. V. ADDITIONAL TERMS A. Governing Law. This Agreement will be construed and governed in all respects according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. B. Relationship to Parties. The parties agree and acknowledge that the School Resource Officers ( "officers ") who are assigned to the district are, and will continue to be, members and employees of the City and its police department. The officers are not agents or employees of the District by virtue of this Agreement and may not make representation to the contrary. The officers will operate under direct administration and supervision of the police department but will work in cooperation with district administration to further mutually agreed upon goals involving the City and the District's schools and students. The officers' main district administration contact is the Director of Community Education Services. Officers do not have disciplinary authority within the schools, are not to be considered educational service providers, and limited to their police functions. C. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party, in whole or in part. D. Modification of Terms. No amendments or modifications to the terms of this Agreement will be binding unless evidenced in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each party hereto. E. Notices. Any notice given in connection with this Agreement will be given in writing and will be delivered either by hand or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the other party, at the party's address stated below. Any party may change its address as stated herein by giving notice of the change of address in accordance with this Paragraph. Indemnification. Each party is liable for its own acts to the extent provided by law and hereby agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the other, its officers and employees against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions, including attorney's fees which the other, its officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur, or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any act or omission of the party, its agents, or employees, in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately perform its obligations pursuant -to this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that each party's liability is limited by the provisions of the municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Ch. 466 and other applicable laws. r. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 6 G. Entire Agreement. This writing evidences the entire Agreement between the City and the District; there are no prior written or oral promises or representations incorporated herein. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed signature page of this Agreement by facsimile or electronic (email) transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties hereby acknowledge that they have read and understand this Agreement and are authorized to enter into this Agreement and have executed this Agreement on the dates recorded below. City of Edina By: (James Hovland) Its: Mayor Date: By: (Scott Neal) Its:. City Manager Date: Independent School District No. 273 By: School Board Clerk Date: A ,ddB To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: 'IV. L From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Action Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Contract For Criminal Prosecution Legal Services With Patrick Leach Action Requested: Adopt motion to approve a proposed contract with the Leach Law Office to provide the City with criminal prosecution services. Information / Background: The City's current contract for criminal prosecution legal services is with the Bonner & Leach law firm. The principal in that firm that served as the City's prosecutor is Mr. Patrick Leach. Mr. Leach has served as the City's criminal prosecutor since 2006. The Bonner & Leach law firm has undergone a recent organizational change. Mr. Leach has formed a new firm: Leach Law Office. The purpose of the proposed action is to formalize the appointment of Mr. Leach as the City's criminal prosecutor by approving a new contract with him and his new firm. The City has had a long and successful relationship with Mr. Leach. He and his firm prosecuted over 2,000 filings in Hennepin County in 2013. Mr. Leach also has the trust and support of the Police Department, which is crucial to his success as our prosecutor. In 2013, the City paid Mr. Leach's firm $223,681 for prosecution services. We are on pace this year to exceed that amount slightly. His contract proposal quotes a monthly flat fee retainer for each of the next three years starting October 1, 2014 and ending on September 30, 2017. The annual year 1 retainer is $229,992; year 2 is $235,008; and year 3 is $240,000. The proposed annual rate of cost increase of this contract is 2.1 %. The proposed total cost is well within the market of wet metro prosecution contracts. I would say it is an especially good deal for the City when one considers the extraordinary volume of court work that we require of our prosecutor. RECOMMENDATION: State Statute 412.651 authorizes the City Manager in a Plan B Council- Manager city to appoint the personnel of the City, "...but the appointment and removal of the attorney shall be subject to the approval of the Council." The City of Edina has been well served by Mr. Leach. His costs are reasonable. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed contract. I recommend the requested action and ask the City Council to appoint Mr. Patrick Leach as the City's criminal prosecution attorney and to approve the proposed contract for his services. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND LEACH LAW OFFICE, PLLC THIS AGREEMENT, effective , 2014, is by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and LEACH LAW OFFICE, PLLC ( "Attorney"). NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: r 1. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL. A. The Attorney shall furnish and perform criminal prosecution legal services for the City. B. The Attorney shall be engaged as an independent contractor and not as a City employee. The attorney is free to contract with other entities. 2. CONTRACT TIME. A. The Attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council and City Manager, and may be terminated without cause by resolution of the City Council and the City Manager. B. The Attorney may terminate the contract at any time, provided the Attorney shall give the City thirty (30) days written notice before the termination becomes effective. 3. PAYMENT. A. The Attorney will bill the City monthly. The City will normally pay for services within thirty -five (35) days of receipt of a statement for services 189927.WPD _l 4. 5. A rendered. Costs and fees will be charged asset forth in subsections B and C below. B. Criminal Prosecution. A monthly retainer for attorney's fees, law clerks, legal assistants and secretaries: $19,166.00 per calendar month from October 1, 2014 to September 30,2015; $19,584.00 per calendar month from October 1, 2015 to September 30,2016- $20,000.00 per calendar month from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. All prosecution legal services are included in the retainer, including criminal appeals, civil and criminal forfeitures of motor vehicles, and prosecution of ordinance violations. C. Costs. Out -of- pocket costs, without mark -up. Costs include: • Westlaw • Recording. fees • Postage of .50¢ or more per mailing piece • Photocopies at .20¢ per copy • Long distance telephone calls • Litigation (court filing fees, expert witnesses, acquisitions, subpoenas, service of process, etc.) INSURANCE. The Attorney will purchase and maintain sufficient insurance to protect Attorney against claims for legal malpractice and provide evidence of the same to the City. REVIEW. The Attorney's performance shall be reviewed as deemed appropriate by the City Manager or City Council. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 189927. WPD _2- B. Assignment. The Attorney may not assign or refer any of the legal services to be performed hereunder without the consent of the Edina City Manager. C. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective'the day and year first above written. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the approval, in writing, of the parties. Dated: September , 2014. CITY OF EDINA bv: AND James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager 189927.WPD -3- Dated: September , 2014. LEACH LAW OFFICE, PLLC by: Patrick G. Leach FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2013 Suburban Statistical Overview for MNCIS & ViBES July 10, 2014 Table of Contents MNCIS — Cases with A Court Appearance Scheduled MNCIS Filings by Type of Offense — 2013 Arranged by Prosecuting Agency ........................... Page 4 MNCIS Dispositions by Type — 2013 Arranged by Prosecuting Agency ........................... Page 6 MNCIS Fines — 2013 ........................ :.............................. Page 8 MNCIS Prosecution Costs — 2013 .... ............................... Page 10 ViBES — Cases without A Court Appearance Issued By Citation VIBES Filings by Type of Offense — 2013 Arranged by Community of Offense ...................... Page 13 ViBES Dispositions by Type — 2013 Arranged by Community of Offense ...................... Page 15 ViBES Fines — 2013 .......................... ..... ........................... Page 17 ViBES Prosecution Costs — 2013 ...... ............................... Page 19 Data Provided by: Marcy R. Podkopacz, Ph.D. Director of the Research Division and Business Practice Unit Statistical Booklet Compiled by: Brenda Longfellow Criminal Court Operations Manager, Suburban Divisions 612.819.2825 brenda.langfellow @ courts. state. mn. us -2- PM 1' =3- MNCIS Filings by Type of Offense — 2013 Misdemeanor and Gross Misdemeanor Filings listed by Prosecuting Agency. Offenses prosecuted by the Hennepin County Attorney's Office have been removed as they were not administered at the Suburban Divisions. Prosecuting Agency Type of Offense Total Domestics DWI Criminal Traffic Parking Bloomington 181 560 2,326 1,555 10 4,632 Brooklyn Center 114 327 1,230 585 13 2,269 Brooklyn Park 366 207 1,117 764 19 2,473 Champlin 42 82 208 281 1 614 Corcoran 7 27 15 29 0 78 Crystal 114 280 300 377 11 1,082 Dayton 8 9 17 38 0 72 Deephaven 4 37 22 58 1 122 Eden Prairie 51 318 359 489 3 1,220 Edina 40 195 279 1,665 6 2,185 Excelsior 6 72 31 40 3 152 Golden Valley 75 301. 325 835 0 1,536 Greenfield 4 5 8 9 0 26 Greenwood 1 11 2 4 0 18 Hanover 3 2 2 0 0 7 Hassan 0 0 0 2 0 2 Hopkins 70 88 162 227 1 548 Independence 6 30 16 38 0 90 LMCD 0 22- 79 0 0 101 Long Lake 7 - 9 16 11 0 43 Loretto 1 1 7 6 0 -15 Maple Grove 78 394 437 512 3 1,424 Maple Plain 8 10 14 35 0, 67 Medicine Lake 0 0 0 1 0 1 -4- MNCIS Filings by Type of Offense — 2013 (continued) Misdemeanor and Gross Misdemeanor Filings listed by Prosecuting Agency. Offenses prosecuted by the Hennepin Countv Attornev's Office have been removed as thev were not administered at the Suburban Divisions. Prosecuting Agency -Type of Offense Total Domestics DWI Criminal Traffic Parking Medina 6 61 49 72 0 188 Metropolitan Airport Commission 9 111 258 280 7 665 Minnetonka 66 183. 361 635 15 1,260 ,.Minnetonka Beach 0 3 1 6 0 10 Minnetrista 7 17 22 44 0 90 Mound 11 18 61 57 0 147 New Hope 62 87 156 290 12 607 Orono 10 56 56 138 0 260 Osseo 7 24 21 42 0 94 Plymouth 148 169 368 591 10 1,286 Richfield 82 332 518 611 3 1,546 Robbinsdale 55 183 256 619 13 1,126 Rockford 2 0 3 4 0 9 Rogers _ 31 50 118 163 3 365 Shorewood 7 57 20 40 0 124 Spring Park 7 13 14 29 0 63 St. Bonifacius 3 9 4 18 0 34 St. Louis Park 155 338 392 386 5 11276 Tonka Bay 0 8 4 3 1 16. Wayzata 7 38 45 62 0 152 Woodland 0 4 3 5 0 12 Total 1,861 4,748 9,702. 11,656 140 28,107 -5- MNCIS Dispositions by Type - 2013 Prosecuting Agency Non- Felony Dispositions Total Found or Pled Guilt Continued Acquittal / Dismissed Bloomington 2,479 1,209 490 4,178 Brooklyn Center 1,213 397 364 1,974 Brooklyn Park 1,353 638 403 2,394 Champlin 308 181 113 602 Corcoran 50 15 10 75 Crystal 605 255 162 1,022 Dayton 51 13 10 74 Deephaven 85 15 11 1,11. Eden Prairie 689 422 158 1,269 Edina 942 1,121 89 2,152 Excelsior 90 35 10 135 Golden Valley 1,205 133 131 1,469 Greenfield 18 4 3 25 Greenwood 11 4 1 16 Hanover 3 1 2 6 Hassan 1 1 0 2 Hopkins 251 187 119 557 Independence 63 19 10 92 LMCD 76 14 6 96 Long Lake 23 9 3 35 Loretto 17 2 3 22 Maple Grove 979 142 141 1,262 Maple Plain 48 14 9 71 Medicine Lake 0 11 0 1 MNCIS Dispositions. by Type— 2013 (continued) Prosecuting Agency Non- Felony Dispositions Total Found or Pled Guilty Continued Acquittal / Dismissed Medina 141 19 16 176 Metropolitan Airport Commission 336 182 45 563 Minnetonka 867 171 118 1,156 Minnetonka Beach 9 4 2 15 Minnetrista 56 36 9 101 Mound 79 35 20 134 New Hope 264 250 89 603 Orono 139 84 27 250 Osseo 53 26 14 93 Plymouth 879 293 99 1,271 Richfield 1,048 190 171 1,409 Robbinsdale 785 199 107 1,091 Rockford 6 5 0 11 Rogers 218 86 39 343 Shorewood 69 29 15 113 Spring Park 25 21 10 56 St. Bonifacius 19 10 4 33 St. Louis Park 777 347 97 1,221 Tonka Bay 10 3 2 15 Wayzata 74 72 9 155 Woodland 7 0 0 7 Total 16,421 6,8941 3,141 26,456 -7- MNCIS Fines - 2013 Community Imposed Collected Uncollected Bloomington $187,485 $127,330 $60,155 Brooklyn Center $48,285 $26,422 $21,863 Brooklyn Park $54,404 $30,985 $23,419 Champlin $23,636 $16,400 $7,236 Corcoran $5,850 $4,591 $1,259 Crystal $42,135' $27,789 $14,346 Dayton $3,512 $3,242 $270 Deephaven $15,808 $1.1,331 $4,477 Eden Prairie $85,717 $63,139 $22,578 Edina $92,079 $73,333 $18,746 Excelsior $17,938 $12,419 $5,519 Golden Valley $147,005 $95,700 $51,305 Greenfield $1,318 $1,078 $240 Greenwood $3,200 $3,120 $80 Hanover $120 $0 $120 Hassan $17 $17 $0.00 Hopkins $21,358 $15,713 $5,645 Independence $7,338 $4,711 $2,627 LMCD $22,752 $19,792 $2,960 Long Lake $2,138 - $1,818 $320 Loretto $3,514 $2,394 $1,120 Maple Grove $158,033 $107,809 $50,224 Maple Plain $2,939 $2,218 $721 Medicine Lake $0 $0 $0 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar li3 MNCIS Fines - 2013 (continued) Community Imposed Collected Uncollected Medina $24,125 $19,604 $4,521 Metropolitan Airport Commission $43,624 $33,298 $10,326 Minnetonka $76,967 $55,458 $21,509 Minnetonka Beach $3,000 $2,240 $760 Minnetrista $8,083 $7,174 $909 Mound $7,481 $5,715 $1,766 New Hope $23,202 $15,287 $7,915 Orono $23,675 $16,964 $6,711 Osseo $8,322 $5,144 $3,178 Plymouth $103,483 $69,430 $34,053 Richfield $59,266 $41,886 $17,380 Robbinsdale ; $64,718 $35,659 $29,059 Rockford $840 $800 $40 Rogers $18,947 $14,745 $4,202 Shorewood $13,279 $11,987 $1,292 Spring Park $4,002 $2,738 $1,264 St Bonifacius $2,054 $1,160 $894 St. Louis' Park $69,919 $55,499 $14,420 Tonka Bay $2,280 $2,280 $0 Wayzata $11,955 $10,262 $1,693 Woodland $1,328 $1,070 $258 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar MNCIS Prosecution Costs - 2013 Community Imposed Collected Uncollected Bloomington $21,5,926 $200,604 $15,322 Brooklyn Center $28,106 $24,231 $3,875 Brooklyn Park $56,790 $49,832 $6,958 Champlin $13,482 $12,157 $1,325 Corcoran $1,995 $1,945 $50 Crystal $23,551 $17,225 $6,326 Dayton $5,816 $5,466 $350 Deephaven $18,650 $16,650 $2,000 Eden Prairie $71,947 $64,565 $7,382 Edina $246,791 $238,180 $8,611 Excelsior $7,650 $6,500 $1,150 Golden Valley $30,856 $25,878 $4,978 Greenfield $925 $925 $0 Greenwood $150 $100 $50 Hanover $150 $150 $0 Hassan Township $75 $75 $0 Hopkins $34,819 $26,513 $8,306 Independence $2,328 $1,728 $600 LMCD $27,950 $22,950 $5,000 Long Lake $667 $667 $0 Loretto $525 $525 $0 Maple Grove $62,712 $50,244 $12,468 Maple Plain $1,428 $1,328 $100 Medicine Lake $425 $0 $425 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar -10- MNCIS Prosecution Costs - 2013 (continued) Community Imposed Collected Uncollected Medina $8,517 $6,517 $2,000 .Metropolitan Airport Commission $43,461 -$41,26,1 $2,200 Minnetonka $31,295 $26,597 $4,698 Minnetonka Beach $1,400 $1,000 $400 Minnetrista $7,775 $6,000 $1,775 Mound $9,228 $6,878 $2,350 New Hope $29,885 $251,283 $4,602 Orono $21,420 $15,775 $5,645 Osseo $6,197 $3,347 $2,850 Plymouth $79,960 $70,702 $9,258 Richfield $28,485 $24,132 $4,353 Robbinsdale $41,317 $32,967 $8,350 Rockford $922 $550 $372 Rogers $9,289 $8,689 $600 Shorewood $10,550 $9,825 $725 Spring Park $4,600 $2,150 $2,450 St. Bonifacius $2,178 $1,878 $300 Sf..Louis Park' $58,204 $55,904 $2,300 Tonka Bay $900 $600 $300 Wayzata $16,825 $14,775 $2,050 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar -11- a VIBES Data -12- ViBES Filings by Type of Offense - 2013 Community of Offense Criminal Parking Traffic Total Bloomington 2,295 878 16,865 20,038 Brooklyn Center 1,209 1,234 4,856 7,299 Brooklyn Park 388 2,409 7,592 10,389 Champlin 401 362 6,068 6,831 Corcoran 43 6 383 432 Crystal 355 2,634 4,859 7,848 Dayton 32 4 633 669 Deephaven 69 214 704 987 Eden Prairie 476 151 6,330 6,957 Edina 554 1,326 17,128 19,008 Excelsior 75 586 595 1,256 Golden Valley 122 .401 .5,368 5,891 Greenfield 18 14 131 163 Greenwood 17 1 25 43 Hanover 11 3 15 29 Hassan 4 0 44 48 Hopkins 161 676 3,678 4,515 Independence 88 4 544 636 Long Lake 10 74 136 220 Loretto 26 38 136 200 Maple Grove 448 11746 5,839 8,033 Maple Plain 109 9 318 436 Medicine Lake 1 0 6 1 7 -13- ViBES Filings by Type of Offense —. 2013 (continued) Community of Offense Criminal Parking Traffic Total Medina 115 80 1,481 1,676 Metropolitan Airport Commission 193 2,034 3,446 5,673 Minnetonka 713 354 8,674 9,741 Minnetonka. Beach 15 12 75 102 Minnetristra 77 113 962 1,152 Mound 223 432 925 1,580 New Hope 138 1,155 3,066 41359 Normand ale College 0 2 0 2 Orono 358 219 1,789 2,366 Osseo 54 97 511 662 Plymouth 757 1,993 8,422 11,172 Richfield 537 536 8,615 9,688 Robbinsdale 195 791 6,449 7,435 Rockford 25 4 27 56 Rogers 1 -75 8 2,357 2,540 Shorewood 49 24 683 756 Spring Park 68 9 320 397 St. Louis Park 302 1,360 3,994 5,656 St. Bonifacius 9 75 412 496 Tonka Bay 39 3 50 92 Wayzata 75 301 941 1,317 Woodland 9 11 40 60 Total 11,038 22,383 135,492 168,91.3 -14- ViBES' Dispositions by Type — 2013 Community Type of Disposition Total Guilty Diversion Dismissed Referred to Court Other Bloomington 10,775 800 1,11.0: 3,234 1 15,920 Brooklyn Center 2,423 131 .344 1,688 4 4,590 Brooklyn Park 5,146 315 876 858 103 7,298 ,Champlin 4,437 404 487 615 2 5,945 Corcoran 252 21 19 47 0 339 Crystal 4,916 216 311 550 2 5,995 Dayton ) 455 36 39 68 1 599 Deephaven 695 30 68 59 0 852 Eden Prairie 4,372 230 590 709 1 5,902 Edina 13,817 5 331 2,095 3 16,251 Excelsior 969 10 48 63 0 1,090 Golden Valley 3,767 140 340 605 2 4,854 Greenfield 101 2 11 23 0 137 Greenwood 31 0 1 8 0 40 Hanover 21 0 2 0 0 23 Hassan 22 0 6 8 0 36 Hopkins 2,700 111 304 312 1 3,428 Independence 396 35 44 75 0 550 Long Lake 169 5 1 13 0 188 Loretto 170 3 5 10 0 188 Maple Grove 5,100 91 506 695 4 6,396 Maple Plain 281 6 14 65 0 366 Medicine Lake 2 0 5 0 0 7 -15- ViBES Dispositions by Type — 2013 (continued) Community Type of Disposition Total Guilty Diversion Dismissed Referred to Court Other Medina 1,256 41 86 105 0 1,488 Metropolitan Airport Commission 3,350 202 430 440 0 4,422 Minnetonka 6,260 399 526 853 0 8,038 Minnetonka Beach J 65 2 11 12 0 ` 90 Minnetristra 731 27 169 70 1 998 Mound 939 24 148 162 0_ 1,273 New Hope. 2,407 94 253 453 10 3,217 Normandale College 1 0 0 0 0 1 Orono 1,519 46 261 226. 0 2,052 Osseo 368 7 16 63 1 455 Plymouth 7,871 436 342 890 2 9,541 Robbinsdale 4,169 213 293 619 7 5,301 Richfield 5,017 418 611 1,080 0 7,126 Rockford 33 1 5 9 01 48 Rogers 1,628 97 142 256 2 2,125 St. Bonifacius 358 7 51 30 0 446 St. Louis Park 3,403 153 222 565 0 4,343 Shorewood 525 35 38 69 1 668 Spring Park -- 235 2 54 46 0 337 Tonka Bay 52 0 8 10 0 70 Wayzata 1,022 42 42 69 0 1,175 Woodland 32 0 2 4 0 38 Total 102,258 4,837 9,172 17,831 148 134,246 -16- ViBES Fines - 2013 Community Fine Imposed Fine Collected Fine Uncollected Bloomington $647,334 $647,491 -$157 Brooklyn Center $122;110 $122,152 -$42 Brooklyn Park $271,854 $271,908 -$54 Champlin $253,893 $253,942 -$49 Corcoran $16,464 $16,471 -$7 Crystal $222,680 $222,705 -$25 Dayton $29,206 $29,207 -$1 Deephaven '$41,873 $41,907 -$34 Eden Prairie $266,260 $266,324 -$64. Edina $723,616 $723,866 -$250 Excelsior $34,547 $34,569 -$22 Golden Valley $194,862 $194,892 -$30 Greenfield $6,078 $6,078 $0 Greenwood $1,438 $1,438 $0 Hanover $1,724 $1,724 $0 Hassan $1,279 $1,279 $0 Hopkins $128,915 $128,940 -$25 Independence $29,567 $29,574 -$7 Long Lake $8,811 $8,811 $0 Loretto $11,013 $11,018 -$5 Maple Grove $272,932 $272,981 -$49 Maple Plain $19,402 $19,402 $0 'Medicine Lake $75 $75 $0 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar -17- ViBES Fines - 2013 (continued). Community Fine" Imposed Fine Collected Fine Uncollected Medina $72,266 $72,292 -$26 Metropolitan Airport Commission $158,311 $158,344 -$33 Minnetonka $393,752 $393,782 -$30 Minnetonka Beach $3,843 $3,843 $0 Minnetristra $42,476 $42,498 -$22 Mound $39,079 $39,082 -$3 New Hope $118,803 $118,823 -$20 Normandale College $37 $37 $0 Orono $82,771 $82,788 -$17 Osseo $19,208 $19,208 $0 Plymouth $415,32.1 $415,418 -$97 Richfield $302,004 $302,035 -$31 Robbinsdale $227,037 $227,081 -$44 Rockford $1,688 $1,688 $0 Rogers $95,049 $95,072 -$23 Shorewood $30,283 $30,291 -$8 Spring Park $11,363 $11,363 $0 St. Bonifacius $18,664 $18,676 -$12 St. Louis Park $150,537 $150,559 -$22 Tonka Bay $2,447 $2,449 -$2 Wayzata $42,249 $42,276 -$27 Woodland $1,526 $1,526 $0 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar -18- I ViBES Prosecution Costs = 2,013 Community Prosecution Cost Imposed Prosecution Cost Paid Prosecution Cost Uncollected Bloomington $170,483 $170,483 $0 Brooklyn Center $21,956 $21,956 $0 Brooklyn Park $73,876 $73,876 $0 Champlin $66,353 $66,353 $0 Corcoran $3,392 $3,392 $0 Crystal $33,604 $33,604 $0 Dayton $5,604 $5,604 $0 Deephaven $7,656 $7,656 $0 Eden Prairie $34,410 $34,410 $0 Edina $445 $445 $0 Excelsior $1,661 $1,561 $0 Golden Valley $36,040 $36,040 $0 Greenfield $300 $300 $0 Greenwood $0 $0 $0 Hanover $0 $0 $0 Hassan $0 $0 $0 Hopkins $26,502 $26,502 $0 Independence $5,334 $5,334 $0 Long Lake $800 $800 $0 Loretto -$750 $750 $0 Maple Grove $25,828 $25,828 $0 Maple Plain $900 $900 $0 Medicine Lake $0 $0 $0 -19- ViBES Prosecution Costs - 2013 (continued) Community Prosecution Cost Imposed Prosecution Cost Paid Prosecution Cost Uncollected Medina $11,278 $11,278 $0 Metropolitan Airport Commission $46,936 $46,936 $0 Minnetonka $89,912 $89,912 $0 Minnetonka Beach $300 $300 $0 Minnetristra $4,420 $4,420 $0 Mound $5,205 $5,205 $0 New Hope $14,995 $14,995 $0 Orono $7,653 $7,653 $0 Osseo $1,500 $1,500 $0 Plymouth $95,801 $95,801 $0 Richfield $70,929 $70,929 $0 Robbinsdale $51,825 $51,825 $0 Rockford $350 $350 $0. Rogers $15,235 $15,235 $0 Shorewood $5,298 $5,298 $0 Spring Park $361 $361 $0 St. Bonifacius $1,400 $1,400 $0 St. Louis Park $23,478 $23,478 $0 Tonka Bay $0 $0 $0 Wayzata $8,269 $8,269 $0 Woodland $0 $0 $0 -20- To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Date: November 3, 2014 Subject: Approve Avolve Software Corporation Licensing Agreement o(4i fILe Agenda Item #: IV. I Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve and authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign attached agreement with Avolve Software Corporation Information / Background: On October 21, 2014, the City Council approved the purchase for electronic plan review software. The approved Request for Purchase was to Avolve Software Corporation for ProjectDox ePlan software. Legal counsels for all parties have reviewed this proposed agreement. Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Avolve Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 f h a Vo' IN e, software AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION Software License, Maintenance, and Services Agreement Terms and Conditions This agreement ( "Agreement") is made this 311t day of October, 2014 ( "Effective Date ") by and between Avolve Software Corporation, a Delaware corporation with offices at 4835 E. Cactus Road, Suite 420, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, United States of America, ( "Avolve" or "Licensor ") and City of Edina with offices at 4801 W.50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 ( "Customer" or "Licensee "). WHEREAS Licensor has created a computer software program called ProjectDox ( "Software ") hereafter more fully described; WHEREAS the parties wish to provide the terms and conditions under which the Licensor will provide the Software for the use by Licensee; WHEREAS Customer wishes Avolve to deliver, install, and maintain the specified Software; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and promises set forth herein, Avolve and Customer agree that Avolve shall provide products and services, and Customer shall pay prices, as set forth in this Agreement. SECTION A— SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT 1. License Grant. a. Upon the Effective Date, Avolve hereby grants to Licensee a non - exclusive, non- transferable, royalty-free, revocable license to use the Avolve Software set forth in the Sales Order attached hereto as Exhibit 1 ( "Sales Order") and related interfaces (collectively, the "Avolve Software ") and Avolve User Guides and Software Documentation provided in or with the Avolve Software ( "User Guides" and "Documentation ") for Licensee's internal business purposes only and otherwise subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Licensee shall not license, sell, rent, lease, copy, distribute, host, outsource, or otherwise commercially exploit the Software. This license is revocable by Avolve if Licensee fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including without limitation, Licensee's failure to timely pay the Software fees in full. Upon Licensee's payment in full. for the Avolve Software, this license will become irrevocable, subject to the restrictions on use and other terms set forth in this Agreement. b. Avolve shall retain ownership of, including all intellectual property rights in and to, the Avolve Software, Documentation, and User Guides. c. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the Avolve Software and User Guides are proprietary to Avolve and have been developed as trade secrets at Avolve's expense. Licensee shall use best efforts to keep the Avolve Software, Documentation, and User Guides confidential and to prevent any misuse, unauthorized use or unauthorized disclosure of the Avolve Software, Documentation, or User Guides by any party. d. The Avolve Software may not be modified by anyone other than Avolve. If Licensee modifies the Avolve Software without Avolve's prior written consent, Avolve's obligations to provide maintenance services on, and the warranty for, the Avolve Software will be void. Licensee shall not modify, make derivative works of, disassemble, reverse compile, or reverse engineer any part of the Software, or access or use the Software in order to build a similar or competitive product or service. e. Licensee may make copies of the Avolve Software for archive purposes only. Licensee shall repeat any and all proprietary notices on any copy of the Avolve Software. Licensee may make copies of the Avolve User Guides for Internal use only. Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) Page 1 of 15 a Vo I've- software f. Licensee may use the Application Programming Interfaces ( "APIs ") of the Software to program those APIs (a "Custom Application ") but only as described in the Documentation for the Software and only to the extent necessary to permit the Licensee's Custom Application to function with the Software through the APIs as described in the Documentation. 2. License Fees. Licensee agrees to pay Avolve, and Avolve agrees to accept from Licensee as payment in full for the license granted herein, the Software fees set forth in the Sales Order. The license fees constitute payment for Software listed in the Sales Order. Any license fees not paid when due shall, which unless otherwise specified will be thirty (30) calendar days from invoice, accrue interest at the rate of 18% eighteen percent (18 %) per annum, but not to exceed the maximum amount as allowed by law 3. Verification. Licensee agrees to permit Avolve to audit the Licensee's use of the Avolve Software and Documentation. Audits may be conducted at least once annually and In accordance with Avolve standard procedures, which may include on -site and /or remote audit. Licensee shall cooperate reasonably in the conduct of such audits. In the event an audit reveals that (i) Licensee underpaid license fees and /or Avolve Support fees to Avolve and /or (ii) that Licensee has used the Software in excess of the license quantities or levels stated in the Sales Order, Licensee shall pay such underpaid fees upon receipt of Avolve's invoice for the fees. 4. Limited Warranty. Avolve warrants, for Licensee's benefit alone and for a period of thirty (30) days, that the Software will substantially conform to the specifications contained in the Documentation and User Guide for thirty (30) days following initial installation. The warranty shall not apply if the Software: (i) is not used in accordance with the Documentation; (ii) is not Initially installed by Avolve or its agents; (iii) defect is caused by Licensee or third -party software developed software. Avolve does not warrant that the Software will operate uninterrupted or that it will be free from minor defects or errors that do not materially affect such performance, or that the applications contained in the Software are designed to meet all of Licensee's business requirements. Provided Licensee notifies Avolve in writing with a specific description of the Software's nonconformance within the warranty period and Avolve validates the existence of such nonconformance, Avolve will, at its option: a) repair or replace the nonconforming Software, or b) refund the license fees paid for the applicable nonconforming Software in exchange for a return of such nonconforming Software. EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES SET FORTH ABOVE, THE SOFTWARE, AND THE SOFTWARE CONTAINED THEREIN, ARE LICENSED "AS IS," AND LICENSOR DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE LICENSEE ASSUMES THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECTTO THE SOFTWARE AND THE SOFTWARE CONTAINED THEREIN, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT. S. Intellectual Property Infringement and Indemnification. Avolve's Obligations. Avolve shall defend and indemnify Customer against any claim by an unaffiliated third party of this Agreement that an Avolve Software Product, if used within the scope of this Agreement, directly infringes that party's registered United States patent, copyright or trademark issued and existing as of the Effective Date or as of the distribution date of a release to the Avolve Software Product, and will pay the amount of any resulting adverse final judgment issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or of any settlement made by Avolve in writing. a. Customer's Obligations. Avolve obligations in this section are contingent on the Customer performing all of the following in connection with any claim as described herein: i. Promptly notifies Avolve in writing of any such claim; ii. Gives Avolve reasonable cooperation, Information, and assistance in connection with the claim; and Page 2 of 15 Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) 1, r� a Vo"I\v eN software Iii. Consents to Avolve's sole control and authority with respect to the defense, settlement or compromise of the claim. b. Exceptions to Avolve's Obligations. Avolve will have no liability hereunder if the claim of infringement or an adverse final judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction results from: i. Customer's use of a previous version of a Avolve Software Product and the claim would have been avoided had Customer used the current version of the Avolve Software, Product; ii. Customer's combining the Avolve Software Product with devices or products not provided by Avolve; iii. Use of a Avolve Software Product in applications, business environments or processes for which the Avolve Software Product was not designed or contemplated, and where use of the Avolve Software Product outside such application, environment or business process would not have given rise to the claim; iv. Corrections, modifications, alterations or enhancements that Customer made to the Avolve Software Product and such correction, modification, alteration or enhancement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be a contributing cause of the infringement; v. Use of the Avolve Software Product by any person or entity other than Customer, Customer's employees, or Licensee's authorized external users; or vi. Customer's willful infringement, including Customer's continued use of the infringing Avolve Software Product after Customer becomes aware that such infringing Avolve Software Product is or is likely to become the subject of a claim hereunder. c. Remedy. In the event a Avolve Software Product is, by a court of competent jurisdiction, finally determined to be infringing and its use by Customer is enjoined, Avolve will, at Its election: i. Procure for Customer the right to continue using the infringing Avolve Software; ii. Modify or replace the infringing Avolve Software so that it becomes non - infringing; or iii. Terminate Customer's license for the infringing Avolve Software Product and refund to Customer the Software fee paid for the infringing Avolve Software Product, as depreciated on a straight -line basis over a seven (7) year period commencing on the Effective Date. The foregoing states Avolve's entire liability and Customer's sole and exclusive remedy with respect to the subject matter hereof. 6. Limitation of Liability. In no event will Avolve be liable for special, indirect, incidental, consequential, or exemplary damages, including, without limitation, any damages resulting from loss of use, loss of data, interruption of business activities, or failure to realize savings arising out of or in connection with the use of the Avolve Software. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Software License Agreement and except for direct damages and expenses associated with Avolve's obligation to indemnify Customer pursuant to Section D (6) (a), Avolve's liability for damages and expenses arising out of this Software License Agreement, whether based on a theory of contract or tort, including negligence and strict liability, will be limited to the amount of software license fees set forth in the Sales Order and paid by Licensee. Such license fees reflect and are set in reliance upon this limitation of liability. Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) Page 3 of 15 aVokje- software SECTION B — SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Agreement. Customer agrees to purchase and Avolve agrees to provide maintenance services for the Avolve Software in accordance with the following terms and conditions. The maintenance services described below does not expand or change any warranty provisions set forth in the Agreement. 2. Term of Agreement. This Maintenance Agreement is effective beginning on the Effective Date and will remain in force for an initial one (1) year term, and will renew automatically for additional one (1) year terms at Avolve's then - current Maintenance fees unless terminated in writing by either party at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then - current term. 3. Payment. a. Maintenance fees will be invoiced by Avolve annually in advance. Avolve shall provide Customer with not less than forty -five (45) days written notice of any change in annual Maintenance fees. b. Additional Charges. Any maintenance services performed by Avolve for Customer which are not covered by this Maintenance Agreement, as set forth in Section B (4), including materials and expenses, will be billed to Customer at Avolve's then current rates. c. Avolve reserves the right to suspend maintenance services if Customer fails to pay undisputed Maintenance fees within sixty (60) calendar days of the due date. Avolve shall reinstate maintenance services upon Customer's payment of all past due Maintenance fees, including all such fees for the periods during which services were suspended. 4. Maintenance Services Terms and Conditions. For as long as a current Maintenance Agreement is in place, Avolve shall: a. In a professional, good and workmanlike manner, perform its obligations in accordance with Avolve's then - current Support Process and Service Level Agreement ( Avolve's current Support Process and Service Level Agreement is set forth in the document attached hereto as Exhibit 2) in order to conform the Avolve Software to the applicable warranty under this Agreement. If Customer modifies the Avolve Software without Avolve's prior written consent, Avolve's obligations to provide maintenance services on and warrant the Avolve Software will be void. b. Provide technical support on the Avolve Software. Avolve personnel shall accept technical support requests and provide technical support during the hours set forth in Exhibit 2 — Support Process and Service Level Agreement. c. Maintain personnel that are appropriately trained to be familiar with the Avolve Software in order to provide maintenance services. d. Provide a customer - accessible system that enables trouble tickets to be entered and tracked through resolution and / or closure. e. Provide Customer with all releases Avolve makes to the Avolve Software that Avolve makes generally available without additional charge to customers possessing a current Avolve annual Maintenance Agreement. Third Party Products; and installation, Consulting and Training services related to the new releases will be provided to Customer at Avolve's then - current rates. f. Support prior releases of the Avolve Software in accordance with Avolve's then - current release life cycle policy. 5. Credits. Should Avolve fail to meet the Problem Determination and Resolution commitments set forth in its then - current Support Process and Service Level Agreement, AS CUSTOMER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY, Page 4 of 15 Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) 1 a ro I 'V e- software Customer shall be entitled to receive a service credit of 2% of the licensee's monthly prorated support fees, per incident in a given month, up to a maximum 50% of monthly prorated support fee payable by the customer. The amount of compensation may not exceed 50% of the licensee's monthly support fee. This means that if a customer has two (2) incidents in which Avolve failed to respond within the time frame stated by Avolve's Problem Determination and Resolution commitments set forth in its then - current Support Process and Service Level Agreement, they are entitled to receive a service credit of 4% of the prorated monthly support fee. 6. Limitations and Exclusions. Maintenance fees do not include installation or implementation of the Avolve Software, onsite support (unless Avolve cannot remotely correct a defect in an Avolve Software Product), application design, other consulting services, support of an operating system or hardware, and support outside Avolve's normal business hours. If Avolve provides technical support for a problem caused by a third - party product or the failure of Customer's computer system or environment to comply with the technical specification requirements included in the Documentation provided with the Software (or Avolve's technical support efforts are materially increased as a result of Customer's use of third -party product or failure to comply with the technical specification requirements), Avolve reserves the right to charge Customer time and materials for such extra services at Avolve's then current published rates for customized, premium technical support services 7. Customer Responsibilities. Customer shall provide, at no charge to Avolve; full and free access to the Avolve Software; working space; adequate facilities within a reasonable distance from the equipment; and use of machines, attachments,.features, or other equipment necessary to provide maintenance services set forth herein. 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event shall Avolve be liable for special, indirect, incidental, consequential, or exemplary damages, including, without limitation, any damages resulting from loss of use, loss of data, interruption of business activities, or failure to realize savings arising out of or in connection with the provision or quality of maintenance services or use of.the Avolve Software. Except for direct damages and expenses associated with Avolve's obligation to indemnify Customer pursuant to Section D (6) (a), Avolve's liability for damages and expenses arising out of this Maintenance Agreement, whether based on a theory of contract or tort, including negligence and strict liability, will be limited to the amount of Maintenance fees set forth in the Sales Order and paid by Customer. Such Maintenance fees reflect and are set in reliance upon this limitation of liability SECTION C — PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. Services. Avolve shall provide the services set forth in the Sales Order at Customer's election, including Consulting, Training, Conversion, and other miscellaneous Services. 2. Professional Services Fees. a. All Services will be provided by Avolve on a time and materials basis at Avolve's then current Professional Services hourly rates unless otherwise agreed by the parties and indicated in the Sales Order. b. Travel expenses will be billed in accordance with the then - current Avolve Business Travel Policy, based on Avolve's usual and customary practices. Copies of receipts will be provided on an exception basis at no charge. c. Unless otherwise agreed in the Sales Order, Avolve shall invoice Customer monthly and Customer shall pay such invoice net thirty (30) days from the date of invoice. Any Professional Services fees not paid when due shall, which unless otherwise specified will be thirty (30) calendar days from invoice, accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18 %) per annum, but not to exceed the maximum amount as allowed by law. Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) Page 5 of 15 a Vo I `>I e- software B. Additional Services. a. Training and /or consulting services utilized in excess of those set forth in the Sales Order and additional related services not set forth in the Sales Order will be billed at Avolve's then - current rates. b. Programming and /or interface quotes are estimates based on Avolve's understanding of the specifications supplied by Customer. In the event Customer requires additional work performed above the specifications provided, Avolve will submit to Customer a Change Order containing an estimate of the charges for the additional work. Work on additional specifications will not begin until the Change Order is accepted and signed by the customer. 4. Customer's Responsibilities. a. Customer shall provide and make available all Customer personnel that Avolve reasonably requires in connection with performance of the Services and as may be further addressed in an applicable Sales Order. b. If the Services are performed at a Customer site, Customer agrees to provide necessary access to its site including, but not limited to, appropriate access to Customer premises, computer systems, Internet connections and other facilities. c. Customer acknowledges that the implementation of the Avolve Software is a cooperative process requiring the time and resources of Customer personnel. Customer shall, and shall cause Customer personnel to, use all reasonable efforts to cooperate with and assist Avolve as may be reasonably required to meet the project deadlines and other milestones agreed to by the parties for implementation. 5. Cancellation. In the event Customer cancels Services less than twenty-one (21) days in advance, Customer is" liable to Avolve for (i) all non - refundable expenses incurred by Avolve on Customer's behalf; and (ii) daily fees associated with the cancelled services if Avolve is unable to re- assign its personnel. 6. Services Warranty. Avolve warrants that all Services provided hereunder will be performed in a workmanlike manner, in conformity with the professional standards for comparable services in the industry. For any breach of this warranty for service, Customer's exclusive remedy shall be the re- performance of the deficient services, and if Avolve is unable to re- perform the deficient services as warranted, Customer shall be entitled to recover the portion of the Professional Services fees paid to Avolve for such deficient services, and such refund shall be Avolve's entire liability. 7. Limitation of Liability. In no event shall Avolve be liable for special, indirect, incidental, consequential, or exemplary damages, including, without limitation, any damages resulting from loss of use, loss of data, interruption of business activities, or failure to realize savings arising out of or in connection with the provision or quality of the services or the use of the Avolve Software. Except for direct damages and expenses associated with Avolve's obligation to indemnify Customer pursuant to Section D (6) (a), Avolve's liability for damages and expenses arising out of this Professional Services Agreement, whether based on a theory of contract or tort, including negligence and strict liability, will be limited to the amount of fees set forth in the Sales Order and paid by Customer. Such fees reflect and are set in reliance upon this limitation of liability. SECTION D — GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Term. The term of this License Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall continue unless and until terminated pursuant Section 2 below. 2. Termination. Each party has the right to terminate this agreement, by giving written notice of termination to the other party, if (a) the other party breaches this agreement and (b) either the breach cannot be cured or, if the breach can be cured, it is not cured by the breaching party within thirty (30) days after receiving written Page 6 of 15 Avolve, Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) a aV10I ery software notice of the breach from the non- breaching party. A substantial deviation of a Software Product from the specifications in the corresponding Documentation will not be considered a breach of this agreement that allows you to terminate the agreement, but it could give rise to a warranty claim under Section A N- 3. Taxes. The fees set forth in the Sales Order do not include any taxes, including, without limitation, sales, use or excise tax. Customer will be responsible for remitting all applicable taxes to the proper authorities. If.tax- exempt, Customer will provide Avolve with Customer's tax - exempt certificate. 4. Force Maleure. Any delay or nonperformance of any provision of this Agreement (other than for the payment of amounts due hereunder) caused by conditions beyond the reasonable control of the performing party shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement, and the time for performance of such provision, if any, shall be deemed to be extended for a period equal to the duration of the conditions preventing performance. 5. Data Practices. All data created, received, maintained or'disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any -other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. 6. Indemnification. a. Avolve shall indemnify and hold harmless Customer and its agents, officials and employees from and against any and all direct claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) for personal injury or property damage arising from Avolve's negligence or willful misconduct. b. Subject to the limitation and immunities in MN. Statutes Chapter 466 the customer shall indemnify and hold harmless Avolve and its agents, officials and employees from and against any and all direct claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) for personal injury or property damage arising from Customer's negligence or willful misconduct. 7. Disclaimer. THE RIGHTS, REMEDIES, AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENTARE EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER RIGHTS, REMEDIES, AND WARRANTIES EXPRESSED, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND SYSTEM INTEGRATION, WHICH ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED BY AVOLVE. 8. Notices: Any notices being given by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective if delivered personally, sent by prepaid courier service, sent by prepaid mail, or sent by facsimile or electronic communication (confirmed on the same or following day by prepaid mail). All correspondence shall be addressed to the parties as follows: If to Avolve: If to Customer: Mr. Ron Loback Dave Fisher President and CEO Chief Building Official Avolve Software Corporation City of Edina 4835 E. Cactus Rd., Suite 420 4801 W. 50`h Street Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Edina, MN 55424 9. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Customer's state of domicile. 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties and supersedes any prior agreements, representation, or understandings, whether oral or written, relating to the Software. Page 7 of 15 Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) a ;/o I��� e- software 11. Severability. Should any"court of competent jurisdiction declare any term of this Agreement void or unenforceable, such declaration shall have no effect on the remaining terms hereof. 12. Assignment. This License, the Licensed Software and any other information or rights provided by Avolve, may not be sold, leased, assigned, sublicensed or otherwise transferred in whole or in part. Customer may not assign this - Agreement or the benefits there from in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Avolve, which consent shall not be unreasonably;withheld. Any assignment made in conflict with this provision shall be voidable at the option of Avolve: 33. Independent Contractor. Avolve is an Independent contractor and not an employee of the Customer. Any personnel performing services under this Agreement on behalf of Avolve shall at all times be under Avolve's exclusive direction and.control. Avolve shall pay all wages, salaries, other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law. Avolve shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding,• unemployment insurance, and worker's compensation insurance. 14. Amendment. This Agreement may only be modified by written amendment signed by authorized representatives of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below. Avolve Software Corporation By: Name: Ron Loback Title: President and Chief Executive Officer Avolve Software Corporation Master Agreement (06272014) City of Edina By: Name: Title: Date: Page 8 of 15 w9)� A,1� o e To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda item A VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 informatJon ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — Ordinance No 2014 -18; An Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 36, regarding front street setback; first floor elevation for tear down /rebuilds; elimination of minimum and maximum unit size for multi - family apartments; and lighting. Action Requested: Grant first reading of the attached Ordinance No. 2014 -18, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Information / Background: Over the past several months, the Planning Commission has been considering an Ordinance Amendment regarding front street setback; first floor elevation for tear down /rebuilds; elimination of minimum and maximum unit size for multi - family apartments; and lighting. The city attorney is recommending that the Zoning Ordinance regulations regarding front yard setback and the one -foot rule be revised. The other amendments are per the Planning Commission's 2014 Work Plan. That would include the lighting ordinance, and the elimination of the minimum and maximum unit size for multi - family housing. The Planning Commission has discussed eliminating the CUP requirement for the one foot rule, and requiring a variance instead. The CUP requirement was added to the Ordinance, at a time when variances were not possible. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending that the conditions required for a CUP would remain in effect, and they would now be required as part of the variance. In regard to the front setback and one -foot rule, the attached Ordinance Amendment has been written to meet the intent of the original language, which was as follows: "Front Setback — Required front street setback was to average the front street setback of the homes on either side." The existing ordinance does not account for a side street setback or an abutting lot with a front street setback that faces a different street. One -Foot Rule for Tear Down /Rebuild — The intent of this ordinance is that the first level of the new home was to match or be no taller than one foot above the pedestrian entry of the existing split level. The ordinance did not define front entry. A garage could be considered a front entry. Additionally, it did not account for multiple entries for a new home. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The City Council is asked to hold a public hearing, and grant first reading of the Ordinance Amendment. If the Council is comfortable with the language as written, you may waive second reading and adopt the Ordinance. If the Council would like to recommend changes; staff would recommend first reading. of the Ordinance, with the Ordinance and changes to come back for second reading. ATTACHMENTS: o Draft Ordinance 2014 -18- C Planning Commission minutes: October 8, 2014 C Past Planning Commission minutes from past discussions on the topics C Planning Commission report dated October 8, 2014 ORDINANCE NO. 20114-18, AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS & FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION REGULATIONS FOR TEAR DOWN REBUILDS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 36 -439 of the Edina City Code. Special Requirements are amended as follows: Sec. 36 -439. Special requirements (1) Special setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. a. Established front street setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one side of a street that ends in a cul -de -sac, or on one side of a dead -end street, are occupied by dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows: 1. If there is an existing dwelling unit on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot that has a front street setback on the same street, the front street setback requirement shall be the same as the front 'street setback of the dwelling unit on the abutting lotion the same street. 2. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot that both have a fro_n_t street setback on the same street, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lots. 3. In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all dwelling units on the same side of that street. b. Side street setback. The required side street setback shall be increased to that required for a front street setback where there is an adjoining interior lot facing on the same street. The required side street setback for a garage shall be increased to 20 feet if the garage opening faces the side street. C. Interior side yard setback. The required interior side yard setback shall be increased by six inches for each foot the building height exceeds 15 feet. For purposes of this subsection, building height shall be the height of that side of the building adjoining the side lot line and shall be measured from the average proposed elevation of the ground along and on the side of the building adjoining the side lot line to the top of the cornice of a-flat roof, to the deck line of a Mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the Existing text — XXXX Stricken text -X Added text—XXXX highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other. arch -type roof, to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof, or to the top of a cornice of a hip roof. d. Rear yard setback, interior lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then, for setback purposes, the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. e. Rear yard setback, corner lots required to maintain two front street setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required.to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. f. Through lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and .structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. Section 2. Subsection 36 -439 of the Edina City Code. Special Requirements are amended as follows: Sec. 36 -439. Special requirements (7) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to,. or rebuilds of, existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split level dwelling is torn down and a new home is first floor elevation of the dwelling unit being torn down is deemed to be the lowest elevation of an entrance to the dwelling, excluding entrance to ,the garage and entrances that do not face a street. +. - .. �°+ f1e ^r ^r en" level elevation may-net be Fn ere than e e fine+ above the 40nt eRtF .elevation e +he heme +ham+ was teFn dewn Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX (8) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor, 'elevation of more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building require a Variance per Sec. 36 -69. Division 3. Such additions to, o'r replacements of, single dwelling unit buildings must meet on�j more of the first three conditions listed in subsection (8)a of this section, and always meet condition four listed in subsection (8)b of this section a. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to L� elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or the city's comprehensive water resource management plan; or the first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from groundwater, lintrusion. Existing and potential groundwater elevations shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic 'engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a� professional civil engineer licensed under Minn. Stats. ch. 326, or a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Studies lanalyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail total w thorough review and approval; or the first floor elevation may b i�� lincreased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet state building code, this Code or other statutory requirements; and An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the ne structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in he mass and scale. Section 3. Subsection 36 -434, Conditional Uses is amended as follows: (9) Additsem td; 4 ieplaeement ef-, single dwelling unit buildings with a fiFSt fleer existing dwelling unit buildiRg. Such additions to, eF Feplac-ements ef-, s*p,& dwelling unit buildings must Fneet ef the PFSt thFee eendffitoens listed subseetier (9)b of this, tid I n. Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text - XXXX Added text —XXXX .. AWAINIF MVPW. NOW Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text - XXXX Added text —XXXX -j F'�yz'�r'rvlvgiz Eenified by the AmeFoean,institute of HY"IF91e y Studies, , ,analyses a, d eerAputatiens shall be submitted in uffi,-ient dh+ail to +h.,.eUgh Feview and a ,-,1., .eF the fi.S+ fleeF elevation .++ , M... +h., e)(t....+ .+.+eess-.. -y . to alle ., the new building to meet the state h..il.deng. e d., this P'...d., Ar ., +h., r +, +. +.,. . nt&j -,.-..J An i .. fi.- +fl.,.,.-.,leyatagn w"! .,..,I., be p tte d *if the new stru- +ure .. -..d.di+i.... fit-1; the eh....,,.+.,.- of +he n ighbeFhee d in height, R.d r .1., Section 4. Subsection 36 -527 (2), Special requirements is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -527. Special requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter, the following special requirements shall apply: Section S. Subsection 36 -1260 of the Edina City Code. Lighting is amended as follows: Sec.. 36- 1260. - Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0 5 twee footcandle measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and �l teff footcandle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. Existing text - XXXX 4 Stricken text -XXXX Added text-.. XXX M 1■:r-i3: nso R,: Z1: T..: 7 .5.7..7,:tTJT..T1T.rT.S WM Section S. Subsection 36 -1260 of the Edina City Code. Lighting is amended as follows: Sec.. 36- 1260. - Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0 5 twee footcandle measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and �l teff footcandle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. Existing text - XXXX 4 Stricken text -XXXX Added text-.. XXX Section 5. This ordinance is effective.immediately upon its passage. 1 First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — James B. Hovland, Mayor 5 G• � 4. Commissioner Scher econded the moti nd offered an amendment to the motion that r gyres the applicant ring back a full sidewalk and boulevard tree getation plan. Co issioner Platteter accepted the offered am ent to the motio Ayes; Scherer, Platteter, Staunton. Nays; Lee, obbs. Motion carried 3 -2. E. Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Chapter 36 Staff Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission they have been.working on amending the zoning ordinance for the past few months. Teague reported that the work has focused on four topics; Front Street Setback, One -foot Rule for Tear Down, Conditional Use Permit process and Lighting. With graphics Teague delivered a power point presentation highling aspects of the proposed amendments. Concluding Teague reported that the City Council will hear the proposed amendments at their November 3, 2014, meeting. Discussion Commissioner Scherer noted a. letter that addresses sport courts and asked Planner Teague how those are handled. Teague' responded that sport courts are permitted in the City and require a building permit, must meet setbacks; however, are not included in lot coverage calculations. Commissioner Platteter questioned with regard to the one -foot rule for teardowns if it would be easier to cap basement height. Planner Teague responded the current Conditional,Use Permit (CUP) process allows Commissioners flexibility, adding he knows there is a minimum requirement for basement ceiling height but no maximum. Chair Staunton commented he also believes much of the height is driven by basement ceiling height. - Teague agreed, adding the Commission always has the discretion to deny or modify a request. Teague said part of the proposed amendment is to bring the one- . foot rule back'under the variance umbrella with the same requirements; however, not as a CUP., Commissioners agreed that the one -foot rule is better served through the variance process. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Comment Laurie Grotz, 5513 Park Place addressed the Commission, Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Commission, John Crabtree, 5400 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Commission and suggested the following: 13 The last sentences of Sec. 36 -439 (1) a, I & 2 "If an abutting lot is a corner lot with a side street setback; that lot is not considered an abutting lot when establishing front street setback" be removed to provide more clarify. It was further suggested that the one -foot rule extend to side yards, especially where there are retaining walls of some height. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the topics; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Chair Staunton said in his opinion all things are best when simplified. A discussion ensued with Commissioners agreeing that the suggestions from the residents had merit and further study may need to occur to address side yard issues. Commissioners further expressed that the Lighting Ordinance Phase I and eliminating the Conditional Use Permit process and requiring a Variance process instead should move forward as written. The discussion proceeded on the other two topics. It was suggested that study continue on side yards, retaining wall situations, and the one - foot rule. Planner Teague said he would add that to the Commissions "bucket list" of future topics of discussion. The discussion continued on front street setback and corner lots with Commissioners acknowledging that historically corner lots have been difficult to address. It was further recognized that not everything can be addressed and that changes create unintended consequences. Further discussion focused on the "old" way front yard setbacks were determined. Noting at one time.a property owner had three choices; one being the ability to average the front yard setbacks of all homes on "your" side of the street between intersections. Commissioners indicated in hindsight that was a good solution. It was further noted that currently a property owner can be penalized if the neighboring house is setback farther from the street than required, creating a non - conforming situation and variance if improvements to the abutting home are requested. Motion Commissioner Scherer moved to recommend ordinance amendments to Chapter 36 based on the October 8, 2014 staff memo from Planner Teague and eliminating text from 36 -439 (1) a. I & 2 "if an abutting lot is a corner lot with a side street setback; that lot is not considered an abutting lot when establishing front street setback. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 14 Chair Staunton said the Commission still struggles with the side yard issue; retaining walls, etc. adding those issues need to be added for the future consideration. W City cans into problems when revisions to plans /surveys are made after the f and resubmitted. Chair Staunton tha ed everyone for their input, adding developing a ecklist is the correct way to proceed.. Stau on said he is a little unclear on if the Com sion should weigh in on the content of the chec ' t or not, pointing out in reality that's staff function. The focus for the Commission is land use. , Commissioner Platteter agree at he doesn't have the expertise on developing these checklist , however would like to se the final outcome. Planner Teague informed the Com 'ssion City sta building, planning, and engineering) would formulate a draft list and provide the mmissi with a copy for their review before it is finalized. Commissioner Forrest questioned if t Com %ssion making decisio ns without feedback from all stakeholders /residents /buil rs /develrveyors. She said she wonders as mentioned by Staunton if this w outside the ions realm of land use. A discussion ensued wit ommissioners supporting the intenance declaration on deeds and that creating a reside al application checklist was good. Co missioners noted that clarity is extremely impo and that further study needs to occur on at happens during the transition peri (pulling a permit and getting the final certificate o occupancy). Continuing, Commissio rs wondered if maybe there was .a legitimate reason re ' ential is treated different from commercial on the building permit end; however, this i a beginning. It was no at much of the current concerns appear to be about storm wate unoff and water qu It was further suggested that the Commission look at a better way encourage the us of pervious surfaces (which may trigger an ordinance change). (� Chair Staunton suggested that staff "take another stab" at the 2015 work plan and bring the M, r 1 kdraft back for further review. C. Zoning Ordinance Amendments Staff Comments Planner Teague addressed the Commission and explained that the continuing work on amending the zoning ordinance continues with the Commission zeroing in on four topics. 1) Front setback, 2)-one-foot rule for tear-down/rebuild, 3) elimination of the minimum and maximum unit size for multi - family housing and 4) adopt part A. of lighting ordinance. Teague said after discussion and formalization of the ordinance amendments the Planning Commission would hold a public hearing. Teague said the public hearing date is tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting on the 8`' of October. In concluding, Teague noted that item 2, (one -foot rule) was adopted in response to a moratorium on variances; that moratorium has been lifted and the Commission has expressed the desire to return this back to a variance process _ Chair Staunton invited the Commission to comment on the proposed changes. Page 6of8 Discussion A brief discussion ensued on the Established Front Street Setback with Commissioners agreeing that the proposed changes would add clarity; however, it was noted that Edina has some unique streetscapes that haven't been specifically addressed and in those instances the property owner can request a variance. Further discussion continued on paragraph (7) -page 2; clarifying that it relates to the present Conditional Use Permit Process and the "One -Foot Rule ". Planner Teague said it is the hope that the Conditional use Permit one -foot rule process is eliminated and handled.through the variance process (as it was prior to the moratorium). Teague explained that staff would remove the language drafted for the conditional use permit process one -foot rule and incorporate it into the variance process. Teague said that the one -foot rule conditions are very good and they should remain in ordinance form; however, moved to the variance process. Commissioners agreed noting the increase in request for Conditional Use Permit because of the I -foot requirement. Planner Teague also noted the implementation of Step I Lighting and the request by the Commission for continued study.- The discussion ensued on unintended consequences with the Commission- acknowledging an ordinance can't be written to address every issue. 7 VII. CORR PONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowle d back of packet mater' s. VIII. CHAIR AND COM SSION OMMENTS Chair Staunton introduced and welc w Planning Commissioner Steve Hobbs. Hobbs said he was excited to be "on boar, forward to working with the Commission. Commissioner Lee updated t Commission on progress of Wooddale Valley View small area plan. Lee said a public iscovery workshop wil a held on the 4`h of October from 8 -12 at the Senior Center. Lee id all are welcome to attend. ontinuing, Lee said their goal as previously mentioned ' the work plan discussion is to Tina the plan by the end of 2014 and present it to the C ncil in January or February 2015. Forres Iso informed Commissioners that the planning am meets on the off - Wednesdays in the Edina ommunity Room between 6 -8 PM. Forres said public and Commissioners are always welcome o attend those meetings. Page 7 of 8 and Carr accep that motion subject to findin A brief discussion ensue with Mr. A rson pointing out with regard to the request for additional plantin the boulevard there is a concern that tenant identification and signage c d be mpromised. Commissioner Lee commented that. with careful selection plantings suc deciduous trees any impact should be minimal. Chair Sta on called for the vote; all vo d aye; preliminary rezoning and preli ary development plan approved 7- . Vlll. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J� A. Zoning:Ordinance Amendment — Front Yard Setback and First Floor J� M � I -foot rule for tear down and rebuild. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission that at their last meeting they discussed front yard setback and the one -foot rule for teardown and rebuild. Teague said in speaking with the city attorney he is recommending that the zoning ordinance regulations on these two items be revised. With graphics Teague highlighted proposed changes to the ordinance. Continuing, Teague explained front setback reads "average the front street setback of the homes on either side ". He pointed out this does not account for a side street setback or an abutting lot with a front street setback that faces a different street. The intent of the one -foot rule was that the first level of the new home was to match or be no taller than one foot above the pedestrian entry of the existing split level. The ordinance did not define front entry so a garage could be considered a front entry. Additional, it did no account for multiple entries for a new home. Chair Staunton noted much of the ordinance was written to address the east side and the traditional grid pattern, adding it's extremely difficult in some areas of Edina like Indian Hills or Rolling Green where the lots are large_ and oddly formed to achieve a uniform front yard standard. Planner Teague stated he agrees with that observation; however, Zoning Ordinance requirements are across the board. He explained the only way to remedy the problems that arise would be to'establish different zoning districts within the R -I umbrella. Teague also said the new I -foot front yard rule has been difficult because split -level homes are not adequately addressed. Teague pointed out that the City doesn't define front.entry, adding there are areas of the code that are clearly defined in every instance. Chair Staunton acknowledged the difficulty pointing out the City, with regard to the -foot rule didn't want'residents to artificially raise the grade of the house. Teague Page 11 of 14 agreed. Commissioner Forrest stated the ordinance changes proposed by Planner Teague are a great improvement; however, she questioned if it would be beneficial to provide illustrations interpreting the changes. Commissioner Carr said it would really help her if she could see illustrations and asked Planner Teague to provide illustrations used by other cities to clarify ordinance requirements. She added as previously mentioned by Forrest visuals would be beneficial. Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to place these two topics back on the Planning Commission for their August 27`h meeting. B. nflict of Interest/Bylaws Planner Pre ntation Planner Teague sta d as a follow up to our previous discussions on By ws and conflict of interest he indicat that the city attorney has suggested the folio ing: SECTION 21. ETHICAL ND RESPECTFUL CONDUC (A) Conflict of Interest Members may not use their po ' 'on on the P benefit. The interests of the Planni CommisE decisions and actions. Any member ho h employed b a business that has a fina al i financial benefit as a result of, /*t n %hi _ ___ _ .__._.... - _. ___ _ . _. . recommendation must rom tl member who has disclosed a contere; and voting on the m atter and sh the Discussion 39 King Commission for personal On must be the first priority in all a financial interest in or who is Merest in, or who may receive a Commission action, decision or fact as a conflict of interest. A should abstain from discussion Commissioner Schroed stated he understands the need for conflicl`of interest language; however, h ointed out Edina is a small community and the 4yestion becomes at what pofnt does it become financial gain or interest. Chair S nton agreed adding financial ipferest is difficult to define, adding it's hard to make a blanklkt move. Schroeder agreed pointing out for those of us that work for large companies may not even kn if certain sectors of our company are working with or for the Ci . . Commiss' ner Carr said in her opinion the language as written is too restrictive. She suggest the Commission look at the guidelines written by the League of Women Vote s. Continuing, Carr pointed out conflict isn't only financial there can be conflict if Page 12 of 14 inn . J "commercial creep ". Staunto suggested engaging the neighbor od to discuss the proposed use. Commissioner Schroeder pointed o that this location' 't commercial and the proposed change in use in his opinion isn't compati a with the ture of Indianola. Commissioner Forrest questioned the applic renovations occurred a number of years ago. owners. business is changing and he would lit Commissioner Forrest acknowledged sh e use of the residential building as office. �ont s ite is only residential- permitting ap ment residents now reside in the buildi . Mr. Du count; but did acknowledge th' _ ature of th Forrest said she..is concerne that presently adding her main concerns re that at present to PUD would be an a ension of commerci mind if the rezoning oves forward; howeve commercial into th" area. a t n the timing of this request pointing out the Duffy responded that the scale of. the property e to f malty accommodate this change. sides in t :neighborhood and did inquire about the inuing, Forr t pointed out the permitted use of this units; not office, nd asked Mr. Duffy how many ffy responded he is aware of the current tenant e residential tenants is ostly transient. Concluding, there is a violation of use ccurring on this site, the building appears dese d and rezoning the site al creep. Forrest stated she uld keep an open r, reiterated she doesn't like th introduction of Chair Staunton a #lained to the applicant in a. request to rezone a site to PUD 1 ere needs to be a community benefit. Staunton said when a formal application is made the applicit needs to address what the benefit to the community would be if this property was rezoned from residential to PUD. Staunton thanked the team for their presentation. Lighting Ordinance Staff Comments Planner Teague submitted a draft copy of an ordinance amendment regarding lighting and asked the Commission for their comments. Teague further asked the Commission to note the attached candle requirements from other cities. Discussion /Comments A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging that the City of Edina appears to allow much brighter lighting in comparison with other cities. All agreed that it was time to craft an ordinance that aligns more closely with standards found in neighboring cities. Concluding, the Commission stated more work needs to be done on the proposed ordinance that would include definitions, light pollution standards and a more comprehensive look at all lighting issues. The discussion continued with Commissioners acknowledging that while the proposed ordinance may not be as comprehensive as the City needs the current language is an excellent. start providing the City with standards while a more comprehensive discussion ensues on lighting. It was further discussed that during this period that the presented Ordinance should Page 11 of 13 be adopted; and a public hearing set. Adoption would make the Ordinance more in line with other cities and provide the Commission more time to study the issue. Chair Staunton suggested setting a public hearing to adopt the proposed Code. D. Confli of Interest/Bylaws Chair Staunton sai the City of Edina has excellent volunteers with a wide range of talents and expertise, adding this an be perceived as a conflict of interest when consid ing quasi- judicial and legislative application r uests (Commissioner works for a company tha ' an applicant or representing as applicant, etc.). Staunton said it is important with new ommission Members that the Commission is cle on what is and what is not a conflict of nterest. Continuing, Staunton said he spoke with oth Planner Teague and the City A rney Roger Knutson and requested that language be dra ed to more clearly define the r of the Commission when /if there is a conflict of interest. Sta nton said he would like furt er discussion.on this at the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Scherer agreed there n ds to be some cl rification or guideline adding that she would like to also, see addressed "what r cusing oneself ooks like ". Scherer said she has seen this handled in different ways; either - indi ting a con ict but remain at the dais and engage in the discussion but not the vote, indicating a onflict emain at the dais; however, do not participate in either the discussion or vote, in 'ca a conflict and sit in the audience or indicate a conflict and completely leave the chambers. Sc rer said it would be helpful if more guidance was given on this issue so.a mixed message n sent to the public. Chair Staunton stated he agrees; he said th re are a o times when a Commissioner has disclosed they know someone personally or profe tonally but el they can. be objective. Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to work with Ro er Knutson, Ci Attorney and bring something back to the Commission on this topic for fu er discussion. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIO Chair Staunton acknowl I 94ged back of packet materials. IX. Commissioners arr and Platteter apprised the Commission on the progress of the Living Streets work g up. It was mentioned that at this time the working group views the materials as a guide and n t part of the City Code. Carr further suggested that Mark Nolan of the Engineering Department speak to the Commission on Living Streets. Page 12 of 13 Date: October 8, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director MEMO w 9SN��r�� o e tli Re: . Zoning Ordinance Amendment Consideration — Ordinance Clean up per the 2014 Work Plan - Front Street Setback, One- Foot'Rule for a Tear Down /Rebuild, Lighting, and minimum square footage multi - family housing. The city attorney is recommending that the Zoning Ordinance regulations regarding front yard setback and the one -foot rule be revised. Staff is recommending additional ordinance amendments per the Planning Commission's 2014 Work Plan. That would include the lighting ordinance, and the elimination of the minimum and maximum unit size for multi- family housing as previously discussed. The Planning Commission has discussed eliminating the CUP requirement for the one foot rule, and requiring a variance instead; therefore, staff has added that to the Ordinance. The CUP requirement was added to the Ordinance, at a time when variances were not possible. Staff would recommend that the conditions required for a CUP would remain in effect, and they would now be required as part of the variance. In regard to the front setback and one -foot rule, the attached Ordinance Amendment in regard to has been written to meet the intent of the original language, which was as follows: Front Setback — Required front street setback was to average the front street setback of the homes on either side. The existing ordinance does, not account for a side street setback or an abutting lot with a front street setback that faces a different street. One -Foot Rule for Tear Down /Rebuild _ The intent-of this ordinance is that the first level of the new home was to match or be no taller than one foot above the pedestrian entry of the existing split level. The ordinance did not define front entry. A garage could be considered a front entry. Additionally, it did not account for multiple entries for a new home. The Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, and recommend an Ordinance Amendment on these issues to the City Council. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 R ORDINANCE NO. 2014- AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS & FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION REGULATIONS FOR TEAR DOWN REBUILDS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1: Subsection 36 -439 of the Edina City Code. Special Requirements are amended as follows: Sec. 36 -439. Special requirements (1) Special setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. Established front street setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one side of a street that ends in a cul -de -sac, or on one side of a dead -end street, are occupied by dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows: 1. If there is an existing dwelling unit on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot that has a front street setback on the same street, the front street setback requirement shall be the same as the front street setback of the dwelling unit on the abutting. lot on the same street. If an abutting lot is a corner lot with a side street setback; that lot is not considered an abutting lot when establishing front street setback. 2. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot that both have a front street setback on the same street, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lots. df an abutting lot is a corner lot with a side street setback; that lot is not considered aW abuttine lot when establishing front street setback.[ 3. In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average front street setback of all dwelling units,on the same side of that street. b. Side street setback. The required side street setback shall be increased to that required for a front street setback where there is an adjoining interior lot facing on the same street. The.required side street setback for a garage shall be increased to 20 feet if the garage opening faces the side street. C. Interior side yard setback. The required interior side yard setback shall be increased by six inches for each foot the building height exceeds 15 feet. For purposes of this subsection, building "height shall be the height of that Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX; side of the building adjoining the side lot line and shall be measured from the average proposed elevation of the ground along and on the side of the building adjoining the side lot line to the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a Mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a. round or other arch -type roof, to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof, or to the top of a cornice of a:hip roof. d. Rear yard setback, interior lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then, for setback purposes, the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the s front lot line. e. Rear yard setback, corner lots required to maintain two front street setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a..line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. f. Through lots. Fora through lot, the required setback for all. buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. Section 2. Subsection 36 -439 of the Edina City Code. Special Requirements are amended as follows: Sec. 36 -439. Special, requirements (7) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of, existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a - splitflevel dwelling is torn down and a new home is built first floor elevation of the dwelling unit being torn down is deemed' to be the lowest elevation of an entrance to the dwelline. excludiniz entrance to, Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text -6 Added text —XXXX t� he garage and entrances that do not face a street. the iiev- Fi. st flOOF nv t— +l, n Cnn+ -�I OIF6 +h.; frnn+ nntFy nln ation A—f ene than i .dE)WR (8) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building require a Variance per Sec. 36 -69. Division 3. Such iadditions to, or replacements of, single dwelling unit buildings must meet one of more of the first three conditions listed in subsection (8)a of this section, and '. always meet condition four listed in subsection (8)b of this section �J The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergent Management Agency (FEMA), or the city's comprehensive water resource management plan; or the first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from groundwater, J intrusion. Existing and potential groundwater elevations shall be, I in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a' professional civil engineer licensed under Minn. Stats. ch. 326, or7a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Studies, analyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to a�llooww, thorough review and approval; or the first floor elevation may be I increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to mee the state building code, this Code or other statutory requirements; and b. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the ne structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in he mass and scale. Section 3. Subsection 36 -434, Conditional Uses is amended as follows: Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX Added text - XXXXI HUM NO. Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX Added text - XXXXI ■ ll l Jew ftern the A-f inteFiff walls bounding the dwelling unit, but shall Ret exteFiff walls and Genter Section 4. Subsection 36 -527 (2), Special requirements is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -527. Special requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter, the following special requirements shall apply: ..■ 689 One bedF8 500 FAiRiFAUFR 7-50 Inn maximum 750 A I- I 1 1 Existing text — XXXX Stricken text -E Added text — 0 ,d ftern the A-f inteFiff walls bounding the dwelling unit, but shall Ret exteFiff walls and Genter i entries feyeFr bale nge & 1 Existing text — XXXX Stricken text -E Added text — 0 ,d Section S. Subsection 36 -1260 of the Edina City Code. Lighting is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -1260. Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond . the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0 5 thFee footcandle measured at property lines abutting property zoned .residential and �l t-e-R footcandle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Existing text — XXXX 5 Stricken text - .X(XX Added text —XXX PT A" Aorle's 4awm% j Am Acres Measure Measure Geometry measure UWft Zoom In Zoom Out, About Overview revious Next [P l'ittp://gis-logis.org/logismap/ ~ ~ or"'—=----p X/21/2014 Logi- - -,p Pa, of 1 http: / /gis.logis.org /logismap/ 9/21/2014 Logi- 'lap P, http: / /gis.logis.org /logismap/ 9/21 /2014 Log= 'ap lir-ear , Feet r,, Area pries i I Measure i Measure Geameh^/ Measure Units Zoom In Zoom Out, About I Overview! Previoa W_ :tk" P� of 1 R, ro rr a w t L^ a IR http: / /izis.loais.orti/loaisma-D/ R / ?1 /,?() 14. Logic 'lap P� of 1 http: / /gis.logis.org/logismap/ 8/21/2014 Logi 'ap pa of 1 11ttD:Hais.loQis.ora /loaismaD/ R /?1 / ?()14. LogiF- - " -l.p Pa of 1 littp:Hgis.logis.org /logismap/ 9/21/2014 MIROWIPME /R�COMML #NDATIOON To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: November 3, 2014 O>" o !1CORPOR:�t�O c IaBB Agenda Item #: VI. B. r. Action Discussion ❑x Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Resolution No. 2014 -137 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -137, approving the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the following: ➢ Revise and replace the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Transportation Chapter (Chapter 7) of the Comprehensive Plan and Figure 7 -10 Sidewalk Facilities. Information / Background: As part of the overall Living Streets Plan, staff has been preparing a new Sidewalk Facilities Map based-in part on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets policy and input from City staff, officials and residents. At the Jul. I Work Session, City Council expressed a desire to approve an updated Sidewalk Facilities Map prior to the approval of the overall Living Streets Plan (anticipated for early of 2015). City Council also directed staff to bring the Sidewalk Facilities Map forward for amendment into the Comprehensive Plan, so that an approved sidewalk network can be considered during the planning and design of current and future roadway reconstruction projects. On Oct. 22, a public hearing was held with the Planning Commission regarding amending the Sidewalk Facilities Map to the Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting testimony was heard and the Commission voted to approve the Comprehensive Planning Amendment and send it to City Council for consideration. The following is the timeline for approvals and amendment to the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan: • Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) Oct. 3 • Informational packet received by City Council Oct. 7 • Planning Commission Public Hearing and Approval of Amendment Oct. 22 • Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) Oct. 27 • City Council Public Hearing and approval of Comprehensive Plan amendment Nov. 3 The Sidewalk Facilities Map shows the streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidewalks are planned over the next 20 -30 years. It should be noted that the map does not indicate on which side of the street future sidewalks are to be installed. This decision will be based on input from more thorough. engineering studies and stakeholders prior to design and installation. Additionally, if a sidewalk is not indicated on a particular street, this does not preclude that street from being considered for a sidewalk in City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 the future as its context criteria (e.g. traffic counts, speeds, redevelopment, etc.) may change over time, and residents are free to petition for a sidewalk as well. The Sidewalk Facilities Map reflects thoughtful and considerable construction of criteria, is data- driven (see attached matrix), and most importantly is consistent with the Living Streets Policy vision and value of supporting the transportation needs of all Edina's residents. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Pedestrian Facilities Attached is the Sidewalk Facilities Map, which will replace Figure 7.10 in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and below is content that is recommended to replace the "Pedestrian Facilities" section of that Plan (Chapter 7, pages 7 -33 to 7 -36: "Pedestrian and Bike Facilities "). Pedestrian Facilities The goal of this section is to build upon the current City practices to create a framework for planning and implementation of future sidewalks. Sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities are an important component of the City's transportation infrastructure. Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages and abilities, decrease the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. -An effective municipal sidewalk system provides network continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users and uses, without notable gaps. Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical connections between multiple modes of travel, as users of motor vehicles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip. Refer to the Sidewalk Facilities Map (Figure 7.10) for locations of existing and proposed future sidewalks. Sidewalks are required: o Where a street abuts or is in the vicinity of a public school, public building, community playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context. o On both sides of minor arterial streets. o On one or both sides of collector streets. ® As required by zoning code or condition of plan approval. a When one or more of the context criteria are met (see below). The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional sidewalk should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering judgment. An optional sidewalk may be required when: ® A sidewalk is recommended by the Edina Active (Safe) Routes to School Comprehensive Plan. o The street is identified as a park or commercial destination. o Average daily traffic is greater than 500 vehicles. 0 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 mph. o There is a history of crashes involving pedestrians walking along the roadway. o Transit stop(s) are present. e A sidewalk would create a logical connection between destinations. o Site lines, roadway geometry, or insufficient lighting makes it difficult for motorists to see pedestrians walking along the roadway. ® The street width is less than 27 feet. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Citizen- and /or business - petitioned sidewalk locations will also receive important consideration as they are brought forward for City review. Sidewalks within the City are divided into the following three categories. It is possible that a sidewalk may fit into more than one category: ' State -Aid sidewalks are located adjacent to Municipal State -Aid Streets (MSAS). Active Routes to School sidewalks are identified by the Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan (approved on Feb 3, 2014) as recommended to improve connectivity and safe routes to schools. City sidewalks are sidewalks that meet the requirements and /or context criteria above. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide to provide adequate, space for two pedestrians to comfortably pass side -by -side. Wider sidewalks (8 to 12 feet) are recommended where pedestrians are likely to travel in groups, such as near schools and in shopping districts, or where adjacent to transit stops. A standard minimum 5 -foot boulevard (the space between the sidewalk and the curb or edge of pavement) shall be provided whenever possible to increase pedestrian safety and comfort, as well as providing space for snow storage. Minimum planted boulevard widths may be three feet (see following paragraph). In shopping districts characterized by zero -lot lines, street furniture and /or on- street parking, sidewalks may be wider with no boulevard. Additionally, a shallower boulevard or curbside sidewalk maybe constructed when the cost of constructing a five -foot boulevard would be excessively disproportionate due to existing right -of -way or topographical constraints. Curbside sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 6 feet unobstructed for travel (5 feet clear of sign posts, traffic signals, utility poles, etc., plus one foot for snow storage /clearing operations). Financing of the future sidewalks are separated into two categories: 1. State -Aid Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State -Aid designated roadway and are paid by a combination of State -Aid funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. 2. Active Routes to School and City Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a non -State -Aid designated roadway and, are paid 100 percent by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. The City should search out additional funding sources, such as grants or partnering with other agencies, for larger projects that have regional significance. One potential important source is the Safe Routes to School Program in which Mn /DOT.allocates federal funds to projects of merit selected on a competitive basis. Sidewalks located on State -Aid roads or within the Public School Zones will be maintained by the City of Edina. Typical City maintenance includes snow removal and repair of broken or shifted sidewalks. Sidewalks located in other areas must be maintained by the property owners. Attachments: o Resolution No. 2014 -137 ® Sidewalk Facilities Map: Figure 7.10 o Sidewalk Criteria Matrix o Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of Oct. 22, 2014 o Resident comments via Speak Up! Edina o Resident email correspondence received during comment period o Resident Petition received Oct. 28, 2014 G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA391 Living Streets \Sidewalk Facilities for Approval \Item VI.B. Public Hearing-Sidewalk Facilities Map.docx RESOLUTO.2014 -137 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO REVISE AND REPLACE THE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SECTION OF TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 7 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Comprehensive Plan states that "sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for all individuals of all ages, decreased the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles." The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that in order for the City's sidewalk system to be effective, it should provide network continuity with broad geographic coverage and without notable gaps. 1.02 In the City's 2013 Quality of Life Survey, 73 percent of respondents indicated that Edina needs more sidewalks. . 1.03 In December of 2012, the City created the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund, which is a dedicated source of funding for the construction and maintenance of non - motorized transportation infrastructure. Property owners are no longer assessed for new sidewalks. 1.04 In August of 2013, the City Council unanimously approved the Living Streets Policy, which includes the following principle: "The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes." 1.05 As part of the overall Living Streets Plan, staff has been preparing a new Sidewalk Facilities Map based in part on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets policy and input from City staff, officials and residents. 1.06 At their f my 1 Work Session, City Council expressed a desire to approve an updated Sidewalk Facilities Map prior to the approval of the overall Living Streets Plan (anticipated by early of . 2015). Council also directed staff to bring the Sidewalk Facilities Map forward for amendment into the Comprehensive Plan, so that an approved sidewalk network can be considered during the planning and design of current and future roadway reconstruction projects. 1.07 On October 22, 2014 a public hearing was held with the Planning Commission regarding amending the Sidewalk Facilities Map to the Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting testimony was heard and the Corrunission unanimously recommended approval of the the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 1.08 The following is the timeline for approvals and amendment to the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan: EDINA PUBLIC WORKS & PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov o 952 - 826 -0376 a Fax 952 - 826 -0392 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137 Page 2 • Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) October 3 • Informational packet received by Council October 7 • Planning Commission Public Hearing and Approval of Amendment October 22 • Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) October 27 o City Council Public Hearing and approval of Comprehensive Plan amendment November 3 1.09 The proposed amendment indicates the Edina streets that currently have sidewalks -along with those streets where sidewalks are planned in the next 20 to 30 years. The following should be noted: o The Plan is not meant to indicate on which side of the street future sidewalks are to be installed; that decision will be based on input from more thorough engineering studies and stakeholders prior to design and installation • If a sidewalk is not indicated on a particular street, this does not preclude that street from being considered for a sidewalk in the future as its context criteria (e.g. traffic counts, speeds, redevelopment) may change over time, and residents are free to petition for a sidewalk as well. • Future sidewalk design (e.g. location, boulevard width) can vary depending on impacts such as existing trees, steep slopes, etc. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Goals of the Comprehensive Plan include safe walking, bicycling and driving, and promoting health; the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting these goals by planning for a citywide pedestrian transportation network based on adopted policy and data. 2. The City's Living Streets Policy states that sidewalks are required on all arterial and collector streets, and where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park; the proposed amendment meets these goals. 3. The proposed amendment reflects thoughtful and considerable construction of criteria, is data - driven, and is consistent with the Living Streets Policy vision and value of supporting the transportation needs of all Edina's residents. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137 Page 3 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Pedestrian and Bike Facilities Pedestrian Facilities The goal of this section is to build upon the current City practices to create a framework for planning and implementation of future sidewalks. Sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities are an important component of the City's transportation infrastructure. Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages and abilities, decrease the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. An effective municipal sidewalk system provides network continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users and uses, without notable gaps. A thereugh i:eviekv of the existing sidewalk and path netiN,ei:k has been completed by City Staff. T-I felleiving categories were used te evaluate existing facilities and help detefmine apprepriate laea fei! future sidewalks. These eategei:ies are generally listed in desc-ending eFdei: ef pfieriq- i% Park and activity center walking zones 1 etaj1 business walking zones Public transit facj4ities .eads where high vehicle tfaffievelumes nat. amn impediment STS Reads defined as CaReEters and above 0 17,,.,,-1. Nvith State A;,-1 de gn atien Sidewalks internal to largef sites - MI. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137 Page 4 ■ • - - - Lorca! / Y Volume Street Zone sidewalks afe any ..:.1eiyall s that o not .,meet any of ffie definitions, above AA - • Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical com- sections between multiple 'Opp of travel, as users of motor vel-dcles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip: Refer to the Facilities Map- (Figrcre 7.10) for locati ons of existing and proposed future - - - - - sidewall<s) Sidewalks are required: o Where a street abuts or is in the vicuzity of a public school, public building, g, community, playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context, On both sides of minor arterial streets a On one or both sides of collector streets. 0 As required by zoning code or condition of plan approvals 0 When one or more of the-context-criteria are met (see below): • TOMMUMMORM AA - • Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical com- sections between multiple 'Opp of travel, as users of motor vel-dcles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip: Refer to the Facilities Map- (Figrcre 7.10) for locati ons of existing and proposed future - - - - - sidewall<s) Sidewalks are required: o Where a street abuts or is in the vicuzity of a public school, public building, g, community, playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context, On both sides of minor arterial streets a On one or both sides of collector streets. 0 As required by zoning code or condition of plan approvals 0 When one or more of the-context-criteria are met (see below): RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137 Page 5 The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional sidewalk should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering judgment. An optional sidewalk maybe required when: o A sidewalk is recommended by the Edina Active (Safe) Routes to School Comprehensive Plan: o The street is identified as a park or commercial destination: G Average daily traffic is greater than 500 vehic_ le&" 'o 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 mph. There is a history of crashes involving pedestrians walking along the roadway; o Transit stop(s) are present.! p A sidewalk would create a logical connection between destinations.' 10 Site lures, roadway geometry, or insufficient lighting makes it difficult for motorists to see pedestrians walling along the roadway., o The street width is less than 27 feet: Citizen- and /or business- petitioned sidewalk locations will also receive important consideration as they are brought forward for-City review! Side wall<s withal the City are divided into the following three categories. It is possible that a sidewalk !may fit into more than one category; State -Aid sidewall<s are located adjacent to Municipal State -Aid Streets (MSAS) Active Routes to School sidewalks are identified by the Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plana roved on Feb 3, 2014 rove connectivity p (- pp ) as recommended to im -- - p and safe routes to schools `City sidewalks are sidewalks that meet the requirements and /or context criteria above; Sidewalks shall be a mmu of 5 feet wide to provide adequate space for two pedestrians to cini m omfortably pass side -by -side. Wider sidewalks (8 to 12 feet) are recommended where pedestrians are likely to travel in groups, such as near schools and in shopping districts, or, where adjacent to transit stops 'A standard minimum 5 -foot boulevard (the space between the sidewalk and the curb or edge of ;pavement) shall be provided whenever possible to increase pedestrian safety and comfort, as well as providing space for snow storage. Minimum planted boulevard widths may be three feet (see,' following_paragr aph) ; In shopping districts characterized by zero -lot lines, street furniture and /or on- street parking; sidewalks may be wider with no boulevard. Additionally, a shallower boulevard or curbside sidewalk may be constructed when the cost of constructing a five -foot boulevard would be excessively disproportionate due to existing right -of -way or topographical constraints. Curbside sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 6 feet Lmobstructed for travel (5 feet clear of signposts, traffic signals, utility poles, etc., plus one_foot for snow _storage/ clearing operations); Financing of the future sidewalks are separated into two categories.' RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137 Page 6 1. State -Aid Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State -Aid designated roadway and are paid by a combination of State -Aid funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety_(PACS) Fund: 2. Active Routes to School and City Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a non- State -Aid designated roadway and are paid 100 percent by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACs) Fund., The City should search out additional funding sources,.such as grants or partnering with other agencies, for larger projects that have regional significance. One potential important source is the Safe Routes to School Program in which Mn /DOT allocates federal funds to projects of merit selected on a competitive basis. Sidewalks located on State -Aid roads or within the Public School Zones will be maintained by the City of Edina. Typical City maintenance includes snow removal and repair of broken or shifted sidewalks. Sidewalks located on Laea!/ Low Volume Stfeet Zones and Pe"6nafti " Zones must b maintained by the propefty . in other areas must be maintained by the property owners. Bike Facilities In 2006, the City Council appointed the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF), made up of citizens interested in bicycle issues and planning. The BETF has overseen the preparation of the City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, which is hereby adopted by reference and included as Appendix T -2. This document provides a detailed identification of current conditions and problem areas regarding bicycle facilities within the City. It also provides a vision regarding system -wide improvements to the City's bicycling facilities. It is the goal of the City to improve conditions for bicycling by reducing hazards and by developing and improving Edina s bicycle transportation infrastructure so as to invite Edina residents, workers, and visitors to include bicycling as part of their daily mobility activities. Bicycle improvements will be implemented to support safe, efficient, and inviting travel for children riding to school and. adults riding to work, as well as recreational users. It is hoped that enhancing biking activities will remove a significant number of vehicular trips from Edina's roadway system. The guiding principles for improving bicycle facilities in Edina are as follows: Improve safety conditions for cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists Provide safe routes for all ages and ability levels Improve connections to local and regional destinations Provide a useful and realistic transportation method within the City Promote bicycling to improve community health One of the key tools that will be used by the City to improve its overall bicycling system as outlined above is a recommended route network as identified in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. This network is provided as Figure 7.11 of this Comprehensive Plan Update. It is divided into primary routes and secondary routes. The City intends to first focus on integrating the primary routes into existing infrastructure before proceeding with the secondary routes. Prior to system improvements being implemented in this manner, they will need to be reviewed by the City's Engineering and Planning Departments to confirm technical feasibility and to refine design elements as warranted. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137 Page 7 Implementation of bicycle system infrastructure improvements will be a relatively long -term undertaking that will be broken down into implementation phases or time periods. The planning and implementation of these improvements take into account regional trail systems and associated improvements, as well as more general infrastructure planning on the part of the City and Hennepin County. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. City Clerk L School -ke L) C..d Mell s[ -7 Con 'onal Mud Like - - - --- -o �'Ccd.om rc l F. z Church St3fiR L,th n Creek Van, Creek Art xvIl School,& Valley Lake Calvin Chrisda School Golden STWI r City C 71 hurch .0" ad of G. ni 100 rV h L Nor southvie Ed, Jr Hit] Communin Ccnlcr j School VAt Lake YVJCIYR Parne 71 ST r - -% Bap'' t ' N 'NI { _ I % 66 111 ST Edina - ScHigh hool Cornelia St Alb.,o, > < Valley view ALLEY VIE RP Jr High In innhea ON . . . L. Calvary X tLul n St Pat rick 4___ tholic Chrifn 70TI-I ST W Poesbyte, Cornelia School Mar- a ♦ DEWEY HILL RD H Lake Edina Public Woft &IM < Park Maintenance 76TH ST W 78TH T W Legend Existing Future . . . . Future Future - - - - Future Sidewalk State-Aid Sidewalk Active Routes City Sidewalk Nine Mile Creek A. City To School Sidewalk Edina N Regional Trail Sidewalk Facilities o e of W+E 2008 Comprehensive Plan UpdateS Engineering Dept Figure 7.10 October 2014 Edina Sidewalk Facilities Plan: Criteria Matrix Streets listed below are local streets as defined in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan (according to the Sidewalk Facilities Plan, sidewalks are required on Minor Arterial and Collector Streets) Quadrant" Street Name(s) Average Daily Traffic .(vehicles) 85th% Speed (mph) Additional Comments Northeast Arden Ave S / Minnehaha Blvd 500 Connects /adjacent to Arden Park Northeast Beard Ave S 400 Connects /adjacent to Strachauer Park Northeast lConcord Ave 1,300 lConnects to Southview Middle School, Kuhlman Field Northeast W 48th St 1,000 Northeast Morningside Rd 1,800 38 Northeast W 49th St * * Pending traffic /speed counts Northeast W 52nd St 475 Connects to Arden Park, trail Northeast W 55th St Connects to York Park Northeast W 58th St 1,000 -3,300 33 Connects three collector streets to Pamela Park Northeast W 59th St 575 31 Connects to Concord School Northeast W 60th St 1,100 Connects to Pamela Park, St. Johns Park Northwest Arbor Ave 310 30 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Northwest Ayrshire Blvd 890 33 Connects Highlands Park and School Northwest Benton Ave 931 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Northwest Division St / Cooper Ave 1,000 34 Connects two collector streets to Todd Park Northwest Doncaster Way 425 32 Connects /adjacent to Highlands Park Northwest Glengarry Pkwy Adjacent to Highlands Park Northwest Hansen Rd 1,700 32 Connects to Birchcrest Park Northwest Interlachen Blvd / Park Terrace / Malibu Dr 1,100 -2,200 Connects toTH 169 & Van Valkenberg Park Northwest Lincoln Dr / Dovre Dr / Londonberry Rd / Stauder Cir 1,750 32 Northwest Malibu Dr / Telemark Tr / Parkwood Rd / Parkwood Ln 1,500 34 Connects to TH 169 & Van Valkenberg Park Northwest I Mirror Lakes Dr 730 32 Connects to Highlands Park Northwest Olinger Rd 1,900 37 Connects to Bredesen Park Northwest Schaefer Rd 1,300 35 Northwest Sun Rd 3,070 31 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Northwest Valley View Rd / Maddox Ln / Normandale Rd 1,500 -2,600 38 Connects to bridges across TH 100 & TH 62 Northwest W 60th St 4,000 36 Northwest W man Ave 1,500 Pedestrian access across TH 62 Southeast Barrie Rd / Heritage Dr 1,350 -3,650 32 Southeast Claremore Dr Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast Cornelia Dr 2,000 35 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast Kellogg Ave Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast I Normandale Rd 1,200 35 Southeast Oaklawn Ave 1,800 35 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast W 64th St Connection to beacon crossing of Xerxes Ave Southeast W 65th St I Connection to hospital /medical area Southeast West Shore Dr 1,300 32 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast lWooddale Ave 5 1,000 Southwest Amundson Ave Adjacent to retail/business area Southwest Braemar Blvd 1,000 32 Connects to Braemar Golf Course, Golf Dome, Arena Southwest Bush Lake Rd 4,500 34 Southwest Dewey Hill Rd / W 74th St 3,400 Connects to Lewis Park Southwest Indian Hills Pass 1,300 34 Connects to Creek Valley Elementary Southwest Nordic Cir Adjacent to Creek Valley School Southwest Ridgeview Rd /Abercrombie Dr / Raburn Dr 460 30 Southwest Tracy Ave / W 66th St 1,500 33 Southwest W 63rd 5t / Ridgeview Dr 2,700 34 Southwest Ohms Ln 2,700 32 Southwest Warren Ave 500 1 33 Connects /adjacent to Normandale Park VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: "Sidewalk Facilities Plan" Staff presentation Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner addressed the Commission and presented a Sidewalk Facilities Plan for an amendment to the Pedestgan and Bike Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. Nolan explained the "newSidewalk Facilities Plan is based on part of the 2008 Comprehensive plan, the .Living Streets policy and input from City staff. Nolan said at a work session the City CWOOn it requested an updated Sidewalks Facilities Plan prior to final approval of a��iving Streets Plan. Nolan noted currently the "Plan" is in the the Council scheduled to hear the propos( concluded that numerous comments in su including two negative comments,,,, Discussion Commissioner Seeley without sidewalks. W street. Commissioner Platted proposed Living,Stree CompsiverPlaWn Commi s. oner Lee as respond edthere is an boulevard and'Arfoot said as the Cit Sidewalks can schools, etc. comment" peribl ;ndment on Nove )f the "P.lan" have the process with ,er 3, 2014. Nolan Mr. Nolanrif it v M'fbund that 'fredestrians are unsafe oonded th'�e�'ir findings ndicatepgedestrians are safer off the that theproposed amendment is a piece of the Wina Streets Plan could fold into the MOW Nola , if there was flexibility in sidewalk size. Mr. Nolan alement of flexibility; however, the City's goal is for a 5 -foot rrf r4 f de walk Lee questioned how sidewalks are prioritized. Nolan ps its Capital Improvements Plan sidewalks are prioritized. done, on11a case by case basis for safety reasons, connectivity to �f A discussion ensued withf- Commissioners wondering if streets can be narrowed, if boulevards are private or publicly owned and who is responsible for boulevard and sidewalk maintenance. In response to questions Mr. Nolan explained that streets can be narrowed when opportunities arise. Boulevards in residential areas are generally publically owned; however maintenance of the boulevard falls to the property owners. Nolan said discussions on boulevard plantings continue; reiterating boulevard maintenance is done by the property owners. Continuing, Nolan also reported that sidewalk maintenance falls to the property owners unless they are located on a State -Aid road or road connecting to public schools. Questions were raised if sidewalks reduce vehicle speed and if a narrower street reduces speed. Mr. Nolan responded he doesn't believe the introduction of sidewalks in itself reduce vehicle speed; however, when other engineering tools are implemented such as narrowed streets, bump outs, plantings, etc. speed is reduced. Commissioners asked if a tree study would be done during the sidewalk process, acknowledging trees could be lost through sidewalk construction. Mr. Nolan responded all sidewalks are subject to a feasibility study, property r §8b, public input etc. Nolan also said study is also done on which side of the streffis best for the sidewalk and where possible trees would be saved. �A, Commissioner Platteter said with regard to sidewalks and trees'�he has seen sidewalks introduced that actually go around trees. h%lan agreed, adding!ra previously mentioned all sidewalks are thoroughly sti ded and noticed beforetconstructed. Chair Staunton opened the public,,,hearing. Public Testimony Deanne Dubbs, 5316 Maddox Lane sidewalks. Tom Dewey, 5612'Cro`; cord A sidewalks, to cli aye; Two reside-nits on West sidewalks. I%Xil�,_ Discussion n on the issue of Commission on the issue of ublic hearing. Commissioner Lee to close public hearing approved. ressed the Commission on the issue of Commissioner Forrest �com�r�'ifented as she understands it a sideway improvement plan and public input process is required before City Council approves specific sidewalk locations. Continuing, Forrest said what's before the Commission this evening is an amendment that updates the Comprehensive Sidewalk Facilities Plan. This "update" provides the public with information on future sidewalk locations. Nolan agreed, reiterating all sidewalk improvement plans would be noticed and heard by the City Council before constructed; adding sidewalks can also "go away" or be added as the City evolves. The Comprehensive Plan Sidewalks Facilities plan doesn't signify immediate sidewalk construction. Commissioner Hobbs stated in his opinion its good that the City provides residents with a sidewalk facilities plan. Commissioners and Chair Staunton agreed, adding it provides transparency. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. AID, Chair Staunton reiterated he supports the amendment, /adding transparency is important ZffW�� and the Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan provides that4ransparency. Staunton further �.Yfi1f1{s noted all proposed sidewalks will be noticed by tfaCity afnd heard by the City Council for review and approval. This also provides residents withhe ability to share their concerns or support for sidewalks in their area/ rX r, VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS % r A. Lot Division. David HenddId5320 Kelsey,. - e�race, Edina, MN f` Staff Presentation, Planner Teague repoited:thatrMr. David - HeIndeUVWbehaIf of'the property owners Paul and Jean Mooty, is1eqUestingi, b shift the xistttmg lot line hat divides the property at 5320 Kelsey Terramand OutlottB of the Parkwood Knolls 26 Addition. Both properties fr /rrf�{f. are owned by the Mooftjhepu pose of then equest is to shift the side lot line to the MN, north to mal<69ro�o�m for an radditiowt&Ahe existino� {home. The Outlot appears to be a IeftoverAmnant &VRarkwood Cnolls 26tf addition that ended up being platted as an Outlot �, e Outlot ong f appe s as part of Lot 26 in the Preliminary Plat. �Jf+f rf �• Planner Teague concludetluf t at staff�recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of,5320 Kelsey TB rrace and Outlot B of Parkwood Knolls 26t" Addition subject to the following findingsn 1. The proposed? -lot line��a'djustment does not create a new lot. 2. The Outlot and 5320fKelsey Terrace are both held under the same ownership. The properties appear to be one lot. 3. The existing utilities on the Outlot would not be impacted. Approval is also subject to the following condition: The existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated prior to filing of the approving resolution with Hennepin County. Discussion a Commissioners questioned why minor lot. line rearrangements and party wall divisions can't be accomplished administratively. Teague explained that at this time Code requires Commission and Council review. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion the lot should be combined as one lot; not continue as two. Teague responded that would require a re- platting and.at this time the property owner has requested this action. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend to #•division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Com" issione "Hobbs seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs; Olsen, Carr, Platteter; Forrest, Staunton. Nay; Lee. Motion carried.# r 101 N r� f City of Edina City of Edina • Home Eqpr —Jects Discussions sigh faumms • ideas • Meetings Ema`II Surveys email address... Passw password... or, Sigaq�th: Conn U Sign In Like CO FT Share This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Sidewalk Plan Page 1 of 14 is v Edina. p p, We're alwayslookin for.feedback and ideas for how we can snake Edina an even be ti for living, leariung, raising families and doing: business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinat ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ►. JOIN the discussion! The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Plan, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidwalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new plan will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. There are two public hearings scheduled where residents can testify regarding this topic: 7 p.m. Oct. 22 Planning Commission meeting and 7 p.m. Nov. 3 City Council meeting. Opinions expressed here will be given to the City Council on Nov. 3. 2 Topics 50 Answers I Closed 2014 -10 -27 View Discussion Topic: Future Sidewalks View the man of the proposed sidewalk plan. Do you have any additional suggestions on where future sidewalks should go? If so, where? 43 Responses 43 Res onses Nancy Killilea 23 days ago Please lead the discussion with SLP to improve the sidewalk on Momingside from Oakdale to Wooddale. Especially with the new development and increased traffic is imperative that we overcome the bureaucracy that continues to stand in the way of safety and community needs. 2 Supports h1Fra• / /ar•Anlriaran� inn nrn/ �ionnaninno/ nianaarnllr_ ralnn /4nraino /fiifiirn_ai�naarnllro In / ')Q / ')ntA City of Edina comment... A V �I Larry Olson 22 days ago Reply to Nancy Killilea Page 2 of 14 This looks like a well laid out and well thought out plan. It's good to see the criteria which determines where future sidewalks should go. It's not saying to put a sidewalk on every street. With the new PACs funding from a franchise fee on gas and electric bills, the burden of paying for these sidewalks is relieved from homeowners. Also, sidewalks on school routes are plowed by the city. 3 Supports comment ... t Sean Hayford Oleary 21 days ago AlV I Reply to Larry Olson Two specific gaps not addressed by the plan: the west side of York/Xerxes ave is missing sidewalk for 100 -200 feet just north of 66th St (a right turn simply cuts into the space of the sidewalk and completely replaces it). This should be marked as future sidewalk. I also think both sides of the 77th St overpass of TH 100 must be marked for future sidewalks. I understand the existing bridge may not be wide enough to do this -- but future means future. In the long ran, it is not reasonable to expect pedestrians on the north side to cross 4 intersections in this busy interchange when they should only have to cross 2. I also think that there should be substantially more sidewalks in the gridded portions of Edina (bordering Hopkins and Minneapolis). Sidewalks create huge value and provide great mobility options for denser, gridded blocks (as they do right now in the Country Club District). 2 Supports Mark Nolan • Transportation Planner admin 20 days ago Thanks for your suggestions Sean! The W. 77th Street bridge over Highway 100 is part of a minor arterial, and should indeed have sidewalks indicated for both sides. That change will be made. As for the west side of Xerxes Ave north of W. 66th, right -of -way restrictions may be an issue there but we will look to incorporate that into our plan as well. Thanks again! 0 Supports comment ... d comment ... V Sean Hayford Olenry 21 days ago Reply to Mark Nolan Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary And apologies for the double posting, but the Delete button doesn't work in Chrome or Firefox. If an administrator were so inclined to delete one of those posts (and this one), that would be great! ht+r.• / /or,nnLnr.nrlinn nrn/ ilionnooinno/ oiiluavnllr_ r. lon / +nr�inn /iiifiirc_m.io.,.�1L� 1 City of Edina 0 Supports Jordan Gileenbach admin 21 days ago Thanks for the heads up, Sean! I've deleted the double post and will let our vendor know of the issue. 0 Supports omment ... r omment ... r t Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Page 3 of 14 David Frenkel 21 days ago I am a proponent of sidewalks but there is a large group of people opposed to them. For the sake of transparency how is the city taking both views into account in building new sidewalks? 0 Supports omment ... r Reply to David Frenkel 07 William David 21 days ago I fully support adding sidewalks in the recommended areas of Chowen Park (including next to my house on 60th St.) Both 58th and 60th Streets are heavily traveled by both drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Sidewalks and minor traffic calming modifications will slow speeding traffic and make it safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Our family hopes the City implements these improvements soon! 6 Supports Joan Orth at October 20, 2014 at 11:35pm CDT I agree. There is quite a bit of pedestrian traffic on W. 60th St. between France and Xerxes, as well as 58th St. One pedestrian was killed between Xerxes and York. The morning or evening sun is a contributing hazard. 0 Supports omment ... r omment ... 0 Reply to Joan Orth Reply to William David 1,�t.,• / /r „o�L „r,nrlino ern/ �ianiionirvnn/ airin�arolL_ r, lon / *nr�ino /iiifiiro_oi�a�srolLe A City of Edina Page 4 of 14 s William David 21 days ago I fully support adding sidewalks in the recommended areas of Chowen Park (including next to my house on 60th St.) Both 58th and 60th Streets are heavily traveled by both drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Sidewalks and minor traffic calming modifications will slow speeding traffic and make it safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Our family hopes the City implements these improvements soon! 3 Supports ment... Reply to William David Karen Sandler Steinert Karen Sandler Steinert 21 days ago Thank you for including West 62nd Street bordering Pamela Lake in the plan, This street is very dangerous to pedestrians and given that it is near a park that is currently expanding its parking lot, the addition of sidewalks are much needed. 5 Supports comment... q d Reply to Karen Sandler Steinert Karen Sandler Stei iert °r y 5.: Chris Bremer 21 days ago I am glad to see the proposed sidewalks on Xerxes, Beard, and 60th, as well as on the east side of France. I hope that, when these sidewalks are put in, the unnecessarily wide streets will be made narrower; in keeping with the adopted Living Streets policy -- that would make things safer by slowing traffic and might also save a number of trees. I would like to see the short stretch of sidewalk on France Ave in front of Fairview Southdale Hospital put in place -- any chance the hospital would fund that rather than waiting for the city to pay for it? It would allow everyone who leaves east of France to walk to Southdale without having to cross France Ave (via the sidewalk from Ewing to France, by Hwy 62). 2 Supports Isaac Broberg 20 days ago Lets keep in mind also it is hard enough for those of us living on France Ave to pull out of our driveways. At the current time most of us have a parking buffer where we are able to pull into. Albeit, often times still honked at by drivers who are speeding by no less as if we are in their, way. France works just fine with one side of sidewalk near my place around 58th to the hwy, I rarely see people walking by. 0 Supports Sean Hayford Oleary 20 days ago iAMQ1101 n City of Edina Page 5 of 14 The trouble with a really busy street like France having a sidewalk on only one side is that people on the "wrong" side of the street have to get across the very busy street to access the sidewalk. Just as it's hard to get out of your driveway, it's very hard to negotiate a gap in traffic to cross if you don't happen to be at a light. France is also a bus route, so it can be difficult to access and wait at stops without sidewalks on both sides. If no pedestrians are present, then it should be OK to pull into the sidewalk area (after checking for peds) to better see traffic on France. 1 Support Chris Bremer 20 days ago If they included some landscaped bumpouts on France along with a sidewalk it could provide protection for residents as they exit their driveways, as well as affording pedestrians on a new sidewalk a bit more separation from traffic.. 0 Supports comment... A V i Sean Hayford Oleary 20 days ago Reply to Isaac Broberg Agreed -- Xerxes is horrendously wide, especially between Crosstown and 66th. I appreciate the value of on -street parking on these streets, but it would be nicer if it were broken up by bumpouts (like Lyndale just north of Minnehaha Creek). 0 Supports Chris Bremer 20 days ago Xerxes happens to be a county road, which is how we got the ugly bumpouts north of the Crosstown on that street -- they just don't have the money to do something attractive as an add -on. Though when the street is totally reconstructed perhaps they could do something. Well- placed bumpouts would make it easier for people to get out of their driveways. 0 Supports comment... V comment... ON V ■ San Asato 21 days ago Who maintains them? Who pays for maintenance costs? Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Reply to Chris Bremer l,t+,.• / /n++nntriir�natr�n h/ ainniinninnn/ n+ rlo\ i) nll/_ Hl ]T /4n..ino /fiifiira_eilla�v�llro In /12/7nla Isaac Brobere 20 days ago Good question. I hope everyone keeps in mind that Edina plows the sidewalks in the winters so more sidewalks means more maintenance costs all the'way around. 0 Supports Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin 20 days ago Edina's Public Works crews plow sidewalks that are.on State Aid and County roadways, sidewalks that are adjacent/leading to parks and schools, and in a few other cases. For all other sidewalks (mostly in residential streets /neighborhoods) it is the property owner's responsibility to remove snow. Other costs associated with sidewalk maintenance are funded by a combination of the Public Works budget and the PACS Fund (http: / /edinamn.gov /vacs fund). Thanks. 1 Support 51-0 T Katherine Stelbere Bass 19 days ago Yes, that'is correct. There will be maintenance costs�for sidewalks, just as there are for roads. Sidewalks are a transportation network for many residents, especially children and older residents who don't drive. It seems perfectly acceptable for the city (and its residents) to provide this public service for all residents, not just the ones who drive. 3 Supports :Y. nment... Reply to Isaac Broberg nment... Reply to San Asato Dave Bender 21 days ago t I support the plan and sidewalks generally. They'll make.the neighborhoods more livable and, properly done, will increase property values. I would Re to see a sidewalk added to the plan on Code Avenue, connecting the proposed sidewalks on Valley View and Benton. That would create a nice walking loop, shorter than going all the way out to Hansen. We especially need a sidewalk along Valley View, from Benton to at least Code. That's a natural walking route, and many people with and without pets walk it; but the cars really Haul on the diagonal stretch form Normandale Lutheran to the block past Code (where it makes a sharp right). It would be good to get a sidewalk along there before a tragedy happens. 2 Supports ° v 4 City of Edina Tom La Fo rce 20 days ago Page 7 of 14 That sidewalk on Valley View was proposed to be part of the Birchcrest B neighborhood reconstruction project. People living on Valley View opposed it, and the council pulled it out of the project. If the sidewalk plan is adopted, it would be good to see that sidewalk reconsidered because the neighborhood reconstruction was delayed until next year and both projects could be done more economically together than as separate projects. 0 Supports Date Frederick 20 days ago I live on the corner of Valley View and Mildred, and I would fully support the proposed sidewalk along our property. Drivers fly around the comers here, and it's just not safe for walkers and bikers. I would hope this public discussion means that more than just the people who live along a particular stretch of proposed sidewalk get to have their opinion considered. 3 Supports comment ... �y comment ... d I Claire lee 20 days ago Reply to Tom LaForce Reply to Dave Bender I love that a new sidewalk is being put in on Vernon by Garden Park. I'm not sure who could address the possibility of adding a pedestrian crossing on Vernon and Garden Park. As of now if you're on the north side of Vernon and want to get over to Garden Park you take your life in your hands and then may have to climb over a barrier. Thanks for adding the sidewalk from Maloney over to the dog park. 3 Supports comment ... A V n Amy Olson 20 days ago Reply to claire lee It's great to see all of this support for sidewalks. I live on Cornelia Drive between Rosland Park and Comelia Elementary and I can tell you that we have a lot of pedestrian traffic that would be much safer if they could use a sidewalk. Kids walking to school (my own son included), families walking to the park and pool, etc. Currently, with cars and pedestrians sharing the streets there are many times that the pedestrians have to hop up on the curb (which is impossible in winter), or cars have to come to a stop if there are two cars passing each other on the road or one car is passing a parked car. It's dangerous. 2 Supports N H•��[�M�/lt /llllv/Ylvl�l /{ vh��l [lAll[t[lt/lYl(l�[11�Di11/1tt/ Ht/ IH�+ AHI!•(1�T11illY�- C111O{{I•]1V[t 1W')Q1N)1A City of Edina omment ... i Reply to Amy " Olson Page 8 of 14 Katherine Stelberg Bass 19 days ago I am grateful for the careful consideration of criteria and time the city has put into this plan. The network of sidewalks proposed seems quite reasonable and fairly conservative -- this is certainly not a "sidewalks on every street" plan that some have predicted. I have a couple of suggestions to consider as additions -- Indian Hills Pass - while it is a short road, it functions, as a neighborhood collector and is directly across from Creek Valley Elementary. I've heard other parents from CV talk about the need for a safe facility for kids coming from neighborhoods directly across from the school. Do we know what the volumes are.on that road? Also, Gleason Road has sidewalk on "the west side, but could we consider a short segment on the east side with'a terminus at Gleason Circle? There are many CV kids on Gleason Circle who walk to school and this would help them get up to Valley View without crossing mid - block. Thank you! 1 Support comment ... I . Reply to Katherine Stelberg Bass Emily Boettge 19 days ago Edina has worked hard to improve pedestrian facilities and it is so nice to see the future sidewalk plan continue the effort toward making walking safe and accessible. We are so lucky to live in a city with great schools, it is encouraging to see that a high priority has been placed on creating safe routes to school for our kids. This thoughtful plan highlights activity corridors where there is already a lot of pedestrian traffic and aims to put sidewalks where they are needed most. 3 Supports Reply to Emily Boettge n� cu k Sauna Swarooa 19 days ago I am very happy that the City of Edina takes our transportation infrastructure seriously and has developed a strong plan to increase safety for pedestrians, especially children walking to school and our elderly neighbors. I appreciate that the City has identified the most important gaps and prioritized them in a way that balances need and cost. ' 4 Supports - - 4?I Reply to Sapna Swaroop Megan Flynn 18 days ago, I'd love to see sidewalks on Monterey to allow children to get to the park at Susan Lindgren more easily and safely! 1 Support 1 ni)Qi)ni n City of Edina Page 9 of 14 comment... 'A Reply to Megan Flynn Joel Stegner, Community.volunteer 18 days ago I am on Barrie Road, two blocks north of 66th. The traffic study has.a top end traffic count of 3650, among the highest in the city. Barrie/Heritage is the one way out of our neighborhood, is very curvy, with lots of cars parked on the street by the Colony and Heritage properties, includes Edina Towers and houses lots of elderly and lower income people. It is dangerous to walk to the south into Fairview Southdale and surrounding medical buildings or to Southdale, because, there is no continuous sidewalk. Seniors should be out walking just as much as children, and the lack of sidewalks practically- forces them to drive short distance. Given the 20+ year timeline, how many�ofthem will still be alive when a sidewalk gets put in. I don't see "any time lines on the plans' timelines, it simply'could become a very process which doesn't serve:the city well. 0 Supports comment. .. Reply to Joel Stegner 1' i 7-1 ih Misty Higgins at October 16, 2014 at 11:12am CDT I was surprised to see that the the comer of 55th and Beard is not on the proposed sidewalk list. Hundreds of people walk this area every day to access the bridge that goes over the creek at this intersection. Is it too late to be considered? 0 Supports comment... y A V Reply to Misty Higgins Y Dustin Carlson at October 16, 2014 at 3:18pm CDT From up in the.Brookside Heights neighborhood, I agree with Claire Lee's comment about adding a pedestrian crossing'near Garden Park. Here's a situation where there is a lot of road (Vernon) between the Tracy and Eden Avenue crosswalks, so people will cross a high - traffic, high -speed road on their own.,Plus, aren't non -stop light crosswalks fairly inexpensive ways to promote walking? The more crosswalks we add across the city, the more drivers will see walkers and learn to share the road with people on foot. There's a great crosswalk on on Interlachen Blvd near Vernon and even though motorists largely disregard it... a(least it's a place to get pedestrians: predictably crossing the road. More of these low -cost paint -and- signage crosswalks please (no flashing lights needed). 0 Supports . comment.... A V Reply to "Dustin Carlson a'4t kristen rice at October 17, 2014 at'10:00am CDT I (and other local residents) would like to see a sidewalk put on Valley View Road from lower Mark Terrace up to Gleason. This is a stretch of road traveled by students on the way to the middle and high schools. This road has; always been a pretty heavily traveled road, and it is getting hi- try• / /or�an�rnr�ai�ino nrrr/ �iornooinns/ oir�n�sn�ir_ r�lon /4nr�ii�o /fiifira_ai�uwol�r�,.. '= �(� /7S: /7l�ld City of Edina Page 10 of 14 more congested as people seem to use it as a cut through during rush hour times to avoid the highways. I understand that there is a plan to put in a sidewalk from McCauley to lower Mark Terrace and I believe that is necessary. However, I believe that the stretch to the high school should have greater priority since kids are using it to walk to school - or would be instead of their parents driving them because of safety concerns. I do not understand why an additional sidewalk was adde&in front of St. Pat's when one was already on the other side of the street. I realize funding is always an issue but The Safe Routes to School Committee felt this was necessary, yet apparently do not feel a sidewalk on Valley View Road, where there is none, was necessary first. I grew up in this neighborhood and am now raising my children here - this sidewalk issue has been something that has been talked about by residents for over 40 years. 0 Supports c A V Jennifer Haenel at October 19, 2014 at 9:55pm CDT Reply to kristen rice I'm very much in support of sidewalks, especially as noted along Oaklawn Ave. However, a proposed sidewalk on Oaklawn Ave. looks to connect to existing sidewalks to the south, cutting through private property. Is this an error on the map? 0 Supports Mark Nolan Transportation Planner admin at October 20, 2014 at 8:51am CDT Ms. Haenel, the City of Edina holds a utility easement in this location, split 50150 between the two adjacent properties. The City's Active Routes to School Plan recommended making this connection, and Edina has been approved for funding for this connection by the Three Rivers Park District (the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will be constructed on Parklawn Ave in 2017). Prior to any construction, the affected property owners will be involved in discussions regarding this trail connection. 0 Supports Jennifer Haenel at October 20, 2014 at 3:20pm CDT Thanks for clarifying! 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Mark Nolan comment ... fy Reply to Jennifer Haenel ■ DK Zabel at October 21, 2014 at 9:23am CDT Thank you for putting a future sidewalk where W 66th and Tracy Ave are combined and then following up through Tracy Ave. There are a lot of school kids and pedestrians that use this half block strip and have no safe place to walk. Traffic is moderately consistent here and it is dangerous at times, especially during the winter months with ice and snow on the roads and during the summer when the Buckthorn overgrowth and visibility of City of Edina Page 11 of 14 pedestrians is blocked at the stop sign of Valley View Rd and W. 66th/Tracy Ave. I look forward this sidewalk, it cannot come soon enough. Thank you!! 1 Support comment... V ■ Jim Strombere at October 22, 2014 at 9:10pm CDT Reply to DK Zabel Another place that could use 'more' sidewalk is 49th St., between France and Maple. Presently, there is a short stretch of sidewalk on the south side of 49th that only crosses two pieces of property. This two -block stretch of 49th is heavily traveled by cars that try and avoid the traffic around 50th and France. The road also has a hill midway through that two -block stretch, which also makes walking along this street more hazardous than normal. It would be great if - at some point in time - this busy little street could have a sidewalk to help residents in this area negotiate the neighborhood without putting their lives in danger. Thanks for'listening'. 0 Supports Bennett Porter at October 23, 2014 at 5:52pm CDT I agree with the need for a sidewalk on 49th. The 2012 sidewalk addition to Halifax Ave from 51st to 54th solved a similar problem of getting to 50th/France dining and walking. Other busy neighborhood streets including Arden Ave from 50th to Arden Park then east to 52nd/Halifax would also benefit from a sidewalk for the safety of our community. 0 Supports comment... A V comment... V u tonva wilhoit at October 27, 2014 at 1:05pm CDT Reply to Bennett Porter Reply to Jim Stromberg I do not see West 59th Street on the plans. This street from Wooddale to Concord is a main street for Concord Elementary. More than 20 children walk to /from Concord on West 59th Street every day. Also, parents, teachers and buses are speeding down this street to get to school. There are no stop signs from Wooddale to Concord on West 59th Street either. On West 59th Street this sidewalk could go from Pamela Park to Concord Elementary. This would seem like a likely spot for a sidewalk and it fits the criteria: routes to school, transit stop on wooddale, logical connection between destinations, it would promote safety in children walking/biking to school. PLEASE CONSIDER WEST 59th STREET- Children walk on this very busy street to the school! 1 Support comment... V Reply to tonya wilhoit l,tt—• / /n„onL,,,,o 1,,,n .rn n;A_ vnll n 1 t)P)Q MA l n City of Edina Page 12 of 14 Peter Choukalas at October 27, 2014 at 3:47pm CDT i Just a few comments concerning the sidewalk plan. Making Edina a more pedestrian-biker friendly community is a positive move. Now, if we could just get more, drivers to pay attention to us pedestrians and bikers .............. .............................As to the sidewalk plan, consider the following: A'. Complete the sidewalk along Normandale Road so that it meets the 9 mile Creek Regional Trail. B. Continue a walkway around•Lake+Edina. It's not a long walk, but would be good for meeting neighbors. C. The walk bridge crossing Highway #62 between Highway #100. and France Ave. was not included on the map. D. Consider completing the sidewalk from Cornelia School along Mavelle Drive to Lymnar Lane to the north or Sandell Ave to the north or both to West 70th Street. Also, consider completing the sidewalk south bn Lynmar Lane to West 72nd Street. E. Continue the walkway on the north side of Fred Richards into the park (after The Fred closes to connect with the regional trail that will go through the park. F. Last, which of the new sidewalks, trails, etc. will be maintained by the City of Edina in the fall and winter, i.e. cleaned of wet leaves in the fall, and cleared of snow in the winter? Thank -you. 0 Supports Reply to Peter Choukalas e� Sr �M Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman at October27, 2014 at 5:37pm CDT I strongly, second adding a sidewalk on 59th Street between Wooddale Ave. and Concord Elementary. The residential neighborhood in this area is very dense and full of Concord.children with 1) no biis service and 2) no safe walking route to school. Anyone who,observes 59th Street during to "to" and "from" school time will immediately see the problem. 59th is THE STREET that walkers use to get to school it is the main, an&direct artery leading to Concord Elementary and the neighborhood funnels to this street as a sort of "safety in numbers" default. Countless families walk this route to and from school, and sadly, share the pavement with speeding cars. and buses rushing to and from Concord, as.59th is also the direct route for vehicles between Wooddale and Concord. Making the pedestrian route worse, is all the overflow, on -street parking (on 59th) the completely bottlenecks 59th at our kids most vulnerable time. With no sidewalks, and cars parked on both sides of the street, we literally walk down the middle of the busy road, with the sunrise in the east making it hard for as to be seen, rushing buses, teachers, and parents. It's just a bad situation. A number of us have noted that a sidewalk looks planned for 60th street, which is fine, but 59th should be prioritized ahead of 60th. 59th is simply THE commuter artery for cars, buses, and most importantly, pedestrians. It needs help. A sidewalk would connect a densely populated neighborhood to 1) a public elementary school with no bus service in the neighborhood, 2) numerous public transportation stops, 3) sports fields, community centers, voter locations. etc. It simply screams "sidewalk ". Thank you! 0 Supports omment... 1 Sign Up Connect email address... Sign Up Participants Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman 1 A City of Edina City of Edina • Home QPr— olects • Discussions Sigh brums • Ideas • Meetings Email Surveys email address... Pasg ,,a password... or, Sig9ijATjjth: Conn U Sign In Like 0 (_Tweet Share Page 1 of 5 Speak'Up E dzta. We're always looking for feedback and "ideas. for how.we can make Edina an even better place for iwing, learning, raising families and doing: business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or-start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Sidewalk Plan ► SEUME your feedback! ► POST your ideas! r JOIN the discussion! The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Plan, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidwalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new plan will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. There are two public hearings scheduled where residents can testify regarding this topic: 7 p.m. Oct. 22 Planning Commission meeting and 7 p.m. Nov. 3 City Council meeting. Opinions expressed here will be given to the City Council on Nov. 3. 2 Topics 50 Answers Closed 2014 -10 -27 View Discussion Topic: Criteria The City follows a set of criteria (memo Rage 2) to identify where sidewalks should go. What additional criteria should the City consider when looking at adding future sidewalks? 7 Responses 7 Responses David Frenkel21 days ago There is no mention in the criteria of mature trees near streets which can make it impractical to build sidewalks like Golf Terrace. There should be requirements to save mature trees. 1 Support 11) i)QMn1A City of Edina comment... d Ch ris Bremer 21 days ago Reply to David Frenkel Page 2 of 5 There could be a criterion related to access to public transportation. For example, sidewalks should be located to enable bus riders, including those with disabilities, to get safely to the nearest intersection/curb cut. Also, it would great to consider whether a sidewalk in a certain location would enable better pedestrian access from residential neighborhoods to retail establishments (in addition to parks and schools). 3 Supports comment ... Reply to Chris Bremer Ch ris Bremer 20 days ago The sidewalk plan should also be coordinated with the county's bike infrastructure plan: htti):H%vvvw.mpmews.or story/2014 /10 /08/hennepin- county- bike -plan . 0 Supports comment... V y Joel Stegner. Community volunteer 18 days ago Reply to Chris Bremer Neighborhoods with high population densities, lots of seniors and lower income people with limited budgets need sidewalks more than lower density, high income neighborhoods. Also, people who live within 4 -5 blocks of shopping facilities should be able to safely walk to the store. 1 Support comment ... 00y V �I tonva wilhoit at October 27, 2014 at 12:57pm CDT Reply to Joel Stegner I do not see 59th Street on the side walk plan. This is the main street going into Concord Elementary from Wooddale. There are more than 20 children who walk on this very busy street to and from school each day. This street has a lot of traffic with the school as well- with parents, teachers and school buses rushing down this street, I'm sure driving faster than 30 mph. It also fits your criteria. 1. Routes to School, 2. It would prevent a history of accidents involving pedestrians (children!) walking along the roadway 3. a logical connection between destinations 4. Transit stops are present (on wooddale). PLEASE CONSIDER A SIDEWALK ON 59th STREET. This is also the intersection where cross walks are for Concord Children getting to school safely, crossing Concord on 59th. 1 Support 1 r1 /70 MA1 A City of Edina comment... A d ■ Chris Bremer at October 27, 2014 at 1:53pm CDT Reply to tonya wilhoit Page 3 of 5 I would like the city to consider whether a particular stretch of sidewalk is the best use of funds in a particular location. I am thinking about Strachauer Park and the planned north -south sidewalk along the west edge of the park. It would not be a bad thing to have a sidewalk there, necessarily, but that park desperately needs an upgraded park building that could serve functions beyond being a simple warming house. Our neighborhood has no community gathering spaces of any kind - no churches, no coffeeshops, no school, nothing. A larger park building would make a huge difference. If the money saved on a planned stretch of sidewalk there (which would lead to a freeway fence and be little -used) could instead be applied by the city towards upgrading the park building, that would be a much better use of city funds and would help our neighborhood a great deal. 1 Support comment ... Reply to Chris Bremer ■ Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman at October 27, 2014 at 5:33pm CDT I strongly second adding a sidewalk on 59th Street between Wooddale Ave. and Concord Elementary. The residential neighborhood in this area is very dense and full of Concord children with 1) no bus service and 2) no safe walking route to school. Anyone who observes 59th Street during to "to" and "from" school time will immediately see the problem. 59th is THE STREET that walkers use to get to school - it is the main, and direct artery leading to Concord Elementary and the neighborhood funnels to this street as a sort of "safety in numbers" default. Countless families walk this route to and from school, and sadly, share the pavement with speeding cars and buses rushing to and from Concord, as 59th is also the direct route for vehicles between Wooddale and Concord. Making the pedestrian route worse, is all the overflow, on -street parking (on 59th) the completely bottlenecks 59th at our kids most vulnerable time. With no sidewalks, and cars parked on both sides of the street, we literally walk down the middle of the busy road, with the sunrise in the east making it hard for us to be seen, rushing buses, teachers, and parents. It's just a bad situation. A number of us have noted that a sidewalk looks planned for 60th street, which is fine, but 59th should be prioritized ahead of 60th. 59th is simply THE commuter artery for cars, buses, and most importantly, pedestrians. It needs help. A sidewalk would connect a densely populated neighborhood to 1) a public elementary school with no bus service in the neighborhood, 2) numerous public transportation stops, 3) sports fields, community centers, voter locations. etc. It simply screams "sidewalk ". Thank you! 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman Sign Up Connect email address... Sign up Participants 1'�i'iH' / /nHO�]1111H�/llvl �] nYh /ninniinninnn /n1A01i1� ]111 -H1�]H /inHl/�n /l�Yl�PY10 10MQ/7111d Mark K. Nolan From: Arnold Bigbee <arniebl@me.com> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 201410:51 AM, To: ` Mark K: Nolan Subject: sidewalks Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: " Completed `Categories: Work Mark, the "Post" option on SpeakUp Edina ends my comments if I begin a new paragraph. Thus this note for my feedback on the sidewalk plan. First, good job with a huge area and lots of people to satisfy. My first thought is that we should overlay a map with transit routes so that there is a sidewalk providing access to each bus stop in Edina. In my neighborhood (Edinborough) there is no sidewalk on the west side of Edinborough Way between 76th St and MN Drive. There is a bus stop at both ends of that streetand large population office buildings and multi - family residential> housing on either side of that block. The info that sidewalk will be added to the N side of W 77fh'St bet. France Av.and Hwy 100 is great news - bus stops there too. The map shows a gap in the sidewalk on Edinborough Way just before it turns north. Sidewalk does exist there now. Sidewalks needed as follows: N side of 54th St bet. France and Xerxes. W side of Xerxes bet. 66th St and Edinborough Way. N side of 69th St bet. York and Xerxes. We should add .a sidewalk corridor to move pedestrians from Xerxes to.. York Ave at Hazelton Rd. Generally, there are way too few sidewalks in the western portions of the realm. Arnie Sent from Arnie Bigbee's iPad2 Cell: 612 804 4660 arniebl @me.com www. legalshieldassociate .com /abigbee Small Business and Group Benefits,Specialist 1 . Mark K. Nolan From: Cary Teague Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:41 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks Categories: Work v4,�.....,f,� Cary Teague, Community Development Director ;,, 952 -826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 952 - 826 -0236 �, 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 t� `�`'' cteagueCa.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning J ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6z. Doing Business From: Holtzman, Mary fmailto : Mary. Holtzman @jostens.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:32 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks NO SIDEWALKS — I very much agree with Sue and Gary Soule. Mary Holtzman 7228 West Shore Drive Commission Members, In regard to the Living Streets Sidewalk Plan, I oppose the change in designation of West Shore Drive from local street to local connector and the consequent requirement of at least one sidewalk on our street. We have lived on West Shore for 26 years. During that time, we have seen abundant recreational use of our street — walking, biking, roller - blading, scooters, etc., - by people of all ages. It is already a "living street ". What we have not seen, or heard reported, is any instance of a car /pedestrian or car /bike accident anywhere between 70th Street and Hibiscus. If our side of the street were to be selected for a sidewalk, the minimum 5 foot boulevard and minimum 5 foot sidewalk would require the loss the two beautiful hardwood maples trees and two evergreens, all over thirty years old. We would also have to move our irrigation system. All of these features were part of what we paid for when purchasing our home, part of the value of our property. "Living streets" should not equate with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to the value of the property and the streetscape. If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of beauty and home value. If traffic speed is a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all we see is a solution without a problem. Sincerely, Sue and Gary Soule 7324 West Shore Drive E i Mark K. Nolan From: Cary Teague., Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:31 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks Categories: Work See below... Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952 -826 -0460 1 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 952 -826 -0236 m 4801 W. 50th St I Edina, MN 55424 cteague( )a EdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Greg Holtzman rmailto:greg.holtzman @ ampf.com] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:24 AM To: Cary,Teague Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks Are you out,of you freaking mind. "Living streets" should not equate with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to the value of the property and the streetscape. If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of beauty and home value. If traffic speed is a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all we see is a solution without a problem: s Wise up ! And come over and walk this street with me Greg A Holtzman Portfolio Associate Managed Account Trading ... ............................... 0:1612.678.1941 Ameriprise Financial 2866 Ameriprise Financial Ctr. Routing S6/2866 ` Minneapolis, Minnesota 55,474 r You 10 We shape fnanclal Anieripris,e rime I solutions fora II*Umea 4 Finuntlai . 1 From: Holtzman, Mary fmailto:Mary.Holtzman @ jostens.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:32 PM To: Holtzman, Greg gregho9Ca eomcast.net Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks From: Graciejean [ mailto :sjsmith126((i)comcast.net]. Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 20143:07 PM To: Sue Soule; Sue Johnson; nancy beegle; < betty.a.johnson@comcast. net>; Bev Moore; Lori J. Connelly;. Geeta Dash; .Michele Azar; Holtzman, Mary; Elizabeth Freeman; Claudia P `Subject: Fwd: Planning Commission; Safe- Sidewalks Tonight at 7:00 pm at City Hall If I left someone out, please forward!!! Susan Jean Smith H- 952 =926 -6907 C- 612 - 600 -5066 F Begin forwarded message: From: "Sue Soule" <sulb3so @comcast.net> Date: October 22, 2014 at 1:07:30 PM CDT To: <cteague @ Edina MN.gov> Cc: "Susan Jean Smith" <sismithl26 @comcast.net> Subject: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks Commission. Members,, In regard to the Living Streets Sidewalk Plan, I oppose the change'in designation of West Shore Drive from local street to local connector and the consequent requirement of at least one sidewalk on our street. We have lived on West Shore for 26 years. During that time, we have seen abundant recreational use of our street — walking, biking, roller - blading, scooters, etc., -by people of all ages. It is already a "living street ". What we have not seen, or heard reported, is any instance of a car /pedestrian or car /bike accident anywhere between 70`h Street and Hibiscus. If our side of the street were to be selected for a sidewalk, the minimum 5 foot boulevard and minimum 5 foot sidewalk would r require the loss.the two beautiful hardwood maples trees and two evergreens, all over thirty years old. We would also have to move our irrigation system. All of these features were part of what we paid for when purchasing our home, part of the value of our propertv:. "Living streets" should not equate with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to the value of the property and the streetscape. If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of beauty and home value. If traffic speed is a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all we see is a solution without a problem. N Sincerely, Sue and Gary Soule 7324 West Shore Drive "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you." Attention City Council Members Attached, please find the recent petition regarding the neighborhood's objection to the proposed sidewalk on Maddox Lane being submitted for approval by the Edina Planni►lf; Commission for the November 3 "', City Council lll.eet:ing. Ofthe 17 households on Maddox Lane, 941A (16 of 1.7 households) are opposed to this plan. in brief, the f.ililowing reasons are why we oppose it. 1. Maddox Lane is only two blocks long. Currently, there is no other sidewalk to which it would connect. The plan for a sidewalk for Valley View Road has heen removed from the plan because (we are told) that the residents opposed it. 2. The sidewalk would not create any logical connection between destinations. We arc Located in o ronlnn►ter neighborhood with the only way to fret l*o required destinations grocery stores, gas stations, rest:au.railts or schools is by driving. 3. W believe that the average daily traffic (vehicles) and the 85th% speed (nlph) cited in the Criteria Matrix of the plan does not reflect Maddox Lane but because it was bundled with Valley View Road and Nornlandale Road, the statistics are significantly exaggerated for nur two block street. Them are natural barriers that reduce spend on Maddox Lane which nlake.s it difficultto go 38mph as stated in the nlat.rix. Also, there was no traffic measuring devices installed on Maddox Lar►e during this study. 4. Maddox Lane is not a street used by pedestrians to any extent as no matter what hlocic of Maddox Lane you live on, if you choose to go fora walls, it is olily a half of a short hlocic to reach a side street that carries less traffic and connect to multiple streets one can walls that are less traveled. S. Most of the front yards on Maddox Lane are relatively shallow. A sidewalk that would consume 10 feet of space would have an adverse affect on the character and aesthetics of the neighborhood. G. There is no history of a single crash or incident on Maddox Lane that has involved a pedestrian. r- SEAS �� 28 V14 Name Address Do you favor adding Do you think Do you feel safe Signature Date n� �a a Gi sidewalks to adding sidewalks walking and/or Maddox Lane? to Maddox Lane biking on Maddox would enhance the Lane? 53 ! 7 fAADDOX Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care ' es No Don't care i 1 character of the /D Z6 Ip '''',wr/ ! v/S neighborhood? I Yes Don't care Yes Don't care TO No Don't care �1 n Otn 53� Y r �C'�X 1•&r� es . No Don't car No Don't care ' Yes o)Don't care I n� �a a Gi Yes Don't care Yes Vo Don't care es No Don't care WALLY 53 ! 7 fAADDOX Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care ' es No Don't care i 1 l40R NDER /D Z6 Ip '''',wr/ ! v/S �a �a �''� %i`'��?N �?vE• I Yes Don't care Yes Don't care TO No Don't care i ,Y 5, 537s1 marteol Yes . Don't care Yes To Don't care es o Don't care ,5Y1,eO !Ai . 5 3 ZI 44,161,,1 Yes Don't care Yeso Don't care Yes &Don't care X" . M41 Y-1ILl LfrWV� - ►1 /If VP-NA -, Orah. Aye. D QN� ��- W'v S —Ir JaLY.I e- G&a,era Name Address , Do you favor adding Do you think Do' ou feel safe Signature Date 5337 f%'ja c""1` Yes 1Vo Don't care sidewalks to adding sidewalks walking and/or Maddox Lane? to- Maddox Lane , biking on Maddox Yes o Don't care i Yes to Don't care. ` 'es No .Don't care would enhance the Lane? character of the Yes dry DoWt care! Yes & Don`t care ' No Don't care r ofzs, neighborhood? _ _ DeA ,nom Yes No Don't care Yes 1Vo Don't care es To Don't care rvLxf-pU 5337 f%'ja c""1` Yes 1Vo Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care j i i I� Yes o Don't care i Yes to Don't care. ` 'es No .Don't care Yes dry DoWt care! Yes & Don`t care ' No Don't care r ofzs, AL,�(A Yes T�o Don't care ;Yes Don't care es No Do czre i ? % Yes :IS Don't care Yes No Don't care i es No Don't care �?28�14 /Iy -. f f Name Address Do you favor adding Do you think Do you feel safe Signature Date tom' sidewalks to adding sidewalks walking and/or (X0 L6 ^a�- Maddox Lane? to Maddox Lane biking on Maddox r. _ Yes o Don't care would enhance the. -Lane? character of the >oal e. neighborhood? -- ,��2 Z�✓ Ye No care Ye No on't car Yes o Don't care 012 tom' (X0 L6 ^a�- Yes o Don't care Yes o DonI care s No Don't care' >oal e. -- c C, / Yes o Don't `care „�T�, Yes Don't care �Tq� es No Don't care �b Wit �f c P � f�'LL Yes No Don't care _ Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care _ _�_ Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No,-Don't care f Yes No Don't,care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care i Name Address Do you favor adding Do you think Do you feel safe �— Signature Date sidewalks to adding sidewalks walking and/or ��Setiv��u a a ` N(_c�J�� Maddox Lane? to Maddox Lane biking on Maddox \ �1� would enhance the Lane? xaGId to a v r I fall Jr 2 /CF 02acl-de,1 ' Yes 1�o Don't care character of the Yes No Don't care neighborhood? I _f a J �"7 /Z( P Yes o Don't care Ye o Don't care es o Don't care �p i ��Setiv��u a a ` N(_c�J�� Yes No Don't care Ye No Don't car Yes No Don't care \ �1� xaGId to a v r I fall Jr 2 /CF 02acl-de,1 ' Yes 1�o Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care I I j (a 52 3 Z !''t�(70 jC Yes o on't care Yes No on't care es o Don't care (,�� �` ! /! IV L— 1,:�L. jdQC frwact-ox Yes S Don't care Yes (!o Don't care �s_ Don't care Cash man LA nz Z5 I`'� lC��( Y Don't care Yes o Don't care es No Don't care to %G J �"7 /Z( 4 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: November 3, 2014 Subject: o e �y POTLN isle Agenda Item M VIII. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Authorize Collaborative Development Planning Agreement - Former Public Works Site, 5146 Eden Avenue Action Requested: Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the collaborative development planning Agreement with Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group and direct City staff to implement the collaborative work plan. Information / Background: On September 16, 2014, the City Council selected Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate Group as the preferred team to explore publiciprivate development scenarios for the Former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue. Frauenshuh and the City will work collaboratively to shape a mixed -use project that includes synergistic public and private elements responsive to the needs of the community and successful in the marketplace. Frauenshuh was one of ten teams of development professionals who responded to the City's Request for Interest (RFI) issued June 2014. The RFI was broadly distributed to professionals in the real estate, planning and consulting fields. Frauenshuh was selected to be the preferred partner based on their submitted materials and interview with the City Council on September 2, 2014. Proposed Agreement An Agreement has been prepared to identify terms of the collaborative planning process. The Agreement outlines a work plan to explore and prepare development scenarios for the site that contain different combinations of public and private uses. The work plan identifies responsibilities for both Frauenshuh and the City. Exhibit "B" of the Agreement also contains a summary of the community engagement plan to be implemented. After the development planning process is completed and potential scenarios are prepared, the City Council will be asked to select a preferred development concept in June 2015. Development Planning Costs The Agreement presumes that the collaborative planning process will be successful and will result in a redevelopment concept agreeable to the City Council. Under these conditions, Frauenshuh will be responsible for the $110,500 cost of the planning process. The City will be responsible for incidental costs of legal, financial and planning reviews ordered on its own behalf independently of the Agreement. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 u November 3, 2014, Pa e 2 g .. In the event that the collaborative process does not identify a redevelopment concept that is agreeable to the City Council, the City will be responsible for a portion of Frauenshuh's cost as follows: • If the City chooses none of the collaboratively prepared public/private scenarios, it will reimburse Frauenshuh for direct consultant costs, up to $53,000. • If the City chooses to development a public/private scenario on the site with a partner other than Frauenshuh, within 12 months of the completion of. the process, the City will be required to reimburse Frauenshuh for its in -house costs, in addition to its direct consultant costs, up to a total of $110,500. In the event that the City Council terminates the process before a conclusion is reached, it will be responsible for Frauenshuh's out -of- pocket consultant costs incurred up to the date of termination. Anticipated Next Stems After a redevelopment concept is selected for the site in 2015, Frauenshuh will likely be named as the 'development partner" responsible for securing financing and approvals for the private component while the City will be responsible for securing the same for the public component. Phased construction would begin after full site approvals are secured, possibly as soon as 2016. Attachments: Proposed Agreement (13 pages) y J n COLLABORATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING J AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2014, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City") and FRAUENSHUH, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Frauenshuh "). WHEREAS, the City is the fee owner of real property located at 5146 Eden Avenue in the Grandview District as depicted in Exhibit A ( "City Property "), consisting of approximately 3.3 acres, which property was formerly used by the City as the Edina Public Works Site; WHEREAS, the City desires to develop the City Property with a project that' includes a combination of public and private uses that work as an integrated whole; WHEREAS, the City intends that the site design for the City Property be consistent with the 2012 Grandview Development Framework and the 7 Guiding Principles for redevelopment in the Grandview District; WHEREAS, The City and Frauenshuh intend to work collaboratively in partnership to create potential redevelopment scenarios for the City:.Property that include both public and private elements; WHEREAS, upon successful completion of the planning phase and selection of a preferred scenario, Frauenshuh. is anticipated to serve as a City development partner to deliver the private uses to, the site. If the City selects a preferred. scenario following completion of the process contemplated under.-this Agreement; the parties anticipate negotiating terms for Frauenshuh'. s redevelopment of the City Property, or portion thereof in a separate contract for redevelopment.. However, this Agreement is not intended to. bind the parties toenter into any future agreements related to the City Property. IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. A. As part of the collaborative process, the City selects Frauenshuh to prepare multiple development scenarios containing public and private uses for the City. Each scenario will be planned and designed to work as an integrated whole and consistent with the 2012 Grandview Development Framework and the 7 Guiding Principles for redevelopment in the Grandview District. B. The specific work to be performed by Frauenshuh, including deliverables and time frames, is more specifically set forth in Exhibit B ( "Work Plan "). The general quality of Frauenshuh's work shall be consistent with industry standards and consistent with Frauenshuh's Letter of Interest dated August 11, 2014 and Supplement dated September 2, 2014 (collectively the "Frauenshuh LOI ") provided in response to the City's Request for Interest identified under Paragraph 2. 1 178758A J C. Frauenshuh's responsibility to provide the work in the,time frames provided under this Agreement is contingent upon the City fulfilling the communication goals regarding the process as more specifically set forth in Exhibit B ( "Work Plan "). D. Each party shall be responsible for additional costs it incurs on its own behalf, that are not included in the Budget as further defined in Section 3. E. Any change to this Scope of Work that results in an increase to the Budget must be approved in advance by both Parties, in writing. F. Any delay to the timeline identified in Exhibit B must be approved by written agreement of both parties. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be together.as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Collaborative Development Planning Agreement B. The City Request.for Interest dated June 25, 2014. C. Frauenshuh Letter of Interest In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document "A" having .the first priority and Contract Document "C having the last priority. 3. PAYMENT. Frauenshuh provided a budget for the Work Plan as attached in Exhibit C ( "Budget ") with a total not to exceed amount of $110,500.00. The City shall pay Frauenshuh and Frauenshuh shall accept payment for Frauenshuh's work as follows: A. If the City Council selects one of the scenarios presented by,Frauenshuh within 120 days after completion of the r Scenario Evaluation, the City shall make no payment to Frauenshuh for work provided under the terms of this Agreement. B. If the City Council elects not to pursue any of the scenarios prepared through this collaborative process, the City shall pay Frauenshuh it's actual out of pocket expenses, delineated as items 3 -7 of the Budget, not to exceed $53,000.00. Out -of- pocket expenses shall be inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges. C. If the City Council enters into an agreement to develop a public /private scenario with a development partner other than Frauenshuh within one year from completion of the Scenario Evaluation,. the City shall reimburse Frauenshuh actual costs to complete the'Collaborative Process phase, delineated as items 1 -2 of the Budget, in addition to the actual out of pocket expenses (items 3 -7 of the Budget) not to exceed a total of $110,500.00, less any amount paid under 3B. The payments identified under subparagraph B and C of this Section shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice 2 1787580 i4 from Frauenshuh following expiration of the 'specified event or time period identified in subparagraphs B and C. 4. 1 OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall be the copyright owner. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing work hereunder, both Frauenshuh and the City shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations_ pertaining to the provisions of work to be provided. 6. STANDARD OF CARE. Frauenshuh shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the work as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied; is included in this Agreement. 7. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. Frauenshuh shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, expense (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) or claims for injury or damage arising out of the performance of this Agreement, caused by or resulting from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of Frauenshuh, its officers, directors, volunteers, agents or employees. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold Frauenshuh, its officers, directors, employees and . agents harmless from any and all liability, loss, expense (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) or claims for injury or damage arising out of the City's performance of this Agreement, caused by or resulting from the negligent or intentional acts or .omissions of the City, its officials; agents or employees. 8. INSURANCE. Frauenshuh shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Frauenshuh from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of work under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence /aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim Before commencing work Frauenshuh shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Frauenshuh as an independent contractor upon the terns and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Frauenshuh is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Frauenshuh shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Frauenshuh shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Frauenshuh's performance under this Agreement. City and Frauenshuh agree that Frauenshuh shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Frauenshuh or any of Frauenshuh's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Frauenshuh shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Frauenshuh's own FICA payments, 178758v4 3 workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self - employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 10. SUBCONTRACTORS /SUBCONSULTANTS. A. Frauenshuh shall be responsible for engaging sub - consultants to provide - professional expertise during implementation of the Work Plan, at Frauenshuh's cost. The approved sub - consultants and their fees for the defined.scope of work are identified in Exhibit C. Use of additional sub - consultants to deliver the defined Work Plan shall be solely at the expense of the party that engages other sub - consultants. B. -Except as identified in the Frauenshuh LOI and Exhibit C, Frauenshuh shall not enter into subcontracts for work provided . under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City.. Frauenshuh shall comply with Minnesota Statute §471.425. Frauenshuh must pay subcontractors/sub- consultants for all undisputed work provided by subcontractor /sub- consultant within ten days of Frauenshuh's receipt of payment from City. Frauenshuh must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor /sub- consultant on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 11. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In "the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. 12. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. City, Frauenshuh and sub - consultants must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1). all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Frauenshuh pursuant to this Agreement. Frauenshuh is subject -to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the:civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Frauenshuh receives a request to release data, Frauenshuh must immediately notify City. City will give Frauenshuh instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Frauenshuh agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Frauenshuh's officers', agents', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The City agrees to defend, indemnify; and ``hold Frauenshuh, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from the City's officers', agents', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 13. , COPYRIGHT. Each party shall defend the other party from actions or claims charging infringement -of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by the party, and shall hold harmless the other party from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 14. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 4 178758A 15. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes .all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions , of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. i17., . TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by either party for any reason or for convenience upon written notice' to the other party. Upon termination by the City, the City shall pay Frauenshuh for out of pocket sub- consultant work completed to date; not to exceed the amount of payment identified in Paragraph 3B. Upon termination by Frauenshuh for the City's failure to meet its obligations under Paragraph 1 C, where such failure constitutes a material breach of this Agreement, the City shall pay Frauenshuh for completed sub..- consultant work, not to exceed the payment identified in 3B. Except as otherwise provided under this "Agreement; no payment shall be made by the City to Frauenshuh upon termination of this Agreement by either party under this Paragraph. Dated: 2014. Dated: , 2014. 178758A CITY OF EDINA LO.", James Hovland, Mayor BY: Scott Neal, City Manager FRAUENSHUH, INC. BY: Its 5 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN OF CITY PROPERTY Parcel A — 2811721310016 (2.92 ac. Approx.) Parcel B - 2811721310015 (0.21 ac. Approx.) Parcel C — 2811721310014 (0.21 ac. approx.) i" Gt S Y 1A f a A Tr � M" Alm : 72mwo" 6 178758A W 1. Frauenshuh Responsibilities in Work Plan Stnae 2 "Process Refinement" � _ t ' Deliverable Date Work collaboratively with City to create site planning process with November- December established sub- milestones and production schedule. The process shall November 3, 2014 include a robust community en a ement plan November 26, 2014 Engage sub - consultants to pr6pare,budget and scope of work November 3, 2014 Schedule and conduct preliminary outreach meetings with neighboring December 3, 2014 property owners and other key stakeholders Staue _i I'nevelanment of Alternative Scenarios" Deliverable Date Conduct outreach meetings to neighboring property owners November- December 2014 Prepare materials for Discovery Session A November 26, 2014 Conduct Discovery Session A (information gathering) December 4, 2014 Prepare summary of Discovery Session that summarizes themes and December 17, 2014 outcomes Conduct kick -off meeting with sub- consultants and City staff to begin development of alternatives based on information gathered to date; development of alternatives will include multiple iterations of potential January 5, 2015 scenarios and will consider possible phasing options. All scenarios will include economic modeling and preliminary financial pro forma to gauge viability. Prepare written progress Iupdate for City Council January 28, 2015 Present progress update to City Council February 3, 2015 Prepare materials for Discovery Session B March 4, 2015 Conduct Discovery Session B (considerations for public uses) March 11, 2015 Prepare preliminary market and use assessment for' potential private uses March 31, 2015 Prepare preliminary Economic /Cost Feasibility Assessment of potential March 31,.2015 scenarios Prepare written report of preliminary Development Alternatives to City March 31, 2015 Council (2 -4 alternatives anticipated) 7 178758A Stage 4 "Public Evaluation of Alternatives" Deliverable Due Date Deliver report of preliminary Development Alternatives to City Council Aril 7, 2015 materials for Open House Aril 14, 2015 -Prepare Present preliminary Development Alternatives at Open House Aril 22, 2015 Debrief and share comments expressed at Open House Aril 30, 2015 Attend City Council Work Session to present Development Alternatives and refinements based on public input May 19, 2015 Prepare written materials, as needed to respond to City Council concerns about preliminary Development Alternatives May 27, 2015 Stage 5 "Selection of Preferred Scenario' Deliverable Due Date Present summary of final Development Alternatives at City Council established sub - milestones and production schedule. The process shall June 2, 2015 meeting and be prepared to respond to questions and concerns City Contribution to Work Plan Stage 2 "Process Refinement" City Obligation Due Date Work collaboratively with Frauenshuh to create site planning process with established sub - milestones and production schedule. The process shall November 3, 2014 include a robust community engagement plan Share public information previously collected as part of the Grandview November 3, 2014 -Development Framework 178758A Staue 3 I'Develonment of Alternative Scenarios" City Obligation Due Date Outreach to Boards and Commissions in advance of Discover Session A December.3, 2014 Publicity and announcement to promote attendance at Discovery Session A December 3,, 2014 information atherin Aril 31, 2015 Create online discussion board to discuss site planning and re -use December 2014 to March Present summary of public input to City.Council at Work Session 2015 Work collaboratively with Frauenshuh to debrief Discovery Session A December 17, 2014 Convene representatives from City departments involved with redevelopment to participate in kick -off of alternative development December 2014 to March scenarios. This team of City staff and Frauenshuh will meet on a regular 2015 basis throughout the development of alternative scenarios. Share public information previously collected as part of the site February 1, 2015 preparation, aration, includin environmental remediation reports Outreach to Boards and Commissions in advance of Discovery Session A February/March 2015 Publicity and announcement to promote attendance. at Discovery Session B March 11, 2015 (consideration of public uses) Prepare preliminary market and use assessment for public uses March 31, 2015 Stage 4 "Public Evaluation of Alternatives" City Obligation Due Date Outreach:to „Boards and Commissions in advance. of Open House Aril 2015 Publicity and announcement to promote attendance at Open House Aril 22, 2015 Work collaborativel y with Frauenshuh to debrief Open House Aril 31, 2015 Collect public feedback regarding Alternatives May 11, 2015 Present summary of public input to City.Council at Work Session May 19, 2015 Stage 5 "Selection of Preferred Scenario” City Obligation Due Date Prepare agenda item for City Council consideration regarding selection of referred scenario June 2, 2015 9 178758v4 Overview of Community Engagement Plan 1) Preliminary Outreach (November 2014) The City's communication resources will be used.to outline the process and encourage participation. Those resources include the City's website, City Extra, posters. NextDoor, Edition Edina and press releases. In addition, Frauenshuh will meet individually with area property owners to collect ideas and encourage participation. Similarly, City staff will attend Board and Commission meetings to review the process and encourage participation. Additional outreach activities will occur throughout the duration of the project. 2) Discovery Session A "information at�g" (December 4, 2014) This session is intended to reconvene interested parties so that the City and Frauenshuh can gather additional information about redevelopment of the site. This session is open to the .-public and will involve a coordinated series of interactive activities; lead by Confluence to assist and include all meeting participants in exploring and discussing a wide range of issues,. challenges_, and opportunities for the site. Target attendance is 80 -100 people. 3) Online Discussion (December 2014 to March 2015) Discover Session A will be followed with a guided discussion on Speak Up, Edina for additional information sharing and suggestions from the general public. 4) Discovery Session B "consideration of public uses" (March 11, 2015) This session involves a review of the themes and information discovered in Discovery Session A. An introduction of the development progress of preliminary alternative scenarios (concepts, preliminary mix, fit and massing studies) that incorporate the public input themes from Discovery Session A and community outreach endeavors will be provided. Reynolds Urban Design will lead an interactive review of the preliminary alternative scenarios and a dot - preference exercise to engage participants in sharing their thoughts and preferences on the potential scenarios. Target attendance is 80 -100 people. 5) Oven House (April 22, 2015) This session provides an opportunity for the community and stakeholders to view alternative development scenarios prior to delivery of final alternative development scenarios and corresponding preliminary feasibility assessments to the City Council on May 19th, 2015. This session would begin with an introduction of the scenarios by the City and Frauenshuh, a brief question and answer session about the scenarios and time for general discussion and interaction with team, stakeholders and community members. 10 178758v4 6) Comment Period (April 8 to May 8, 2015) The alternative'development scenarios will be on display at City Hall along with comment cards to collect additional input. The scenarios will also be posted on Speak Up, Edina for online comments. Summary of Critical Dates r November 3, 2014 City Council consideration of Collaborative Development Planning Agreement December 4, 2014 Discovery Session A (Information Gathering) February 3, 20.15 Update status report delivered to City Council (regular meeting) March 11, 2015 Discovery Session B (Consideration of Public Uses) April 7, 2015 ' Deliver progress report of preliminary Development Alternatives to City Council <. (regular meeting) April 22, 2015 Public Open House to review alternatives May 19, 2015 Deliver summary of Development Alternatives and refinements based on public input to City Council (work session) June 2, 2015 City Council to select preferred scenario and provide direction to proceed (regular meeting) ' 11 178758A 00 N Preliminary. Work Plan:` Grandview Phase l Collaborative Development Process: IN RFI COLLABORATIVE PROCESS StaR� End — Nov DecI Jan 7-1 Mar P i May June]_- - - -� �.T Stage 1. PaRnerSeleotlon �' 9/2/14 9/16/14 ^! = Session B - `C Stage 2: Process Refinement 9/16 /14 1/18/14 StoB� e1 - -� Late Feb/EorlyMarch .PUbUc'Dlscovery Interactive Session - �T — � . I Open Hovae I �' rwJdap.Jl /eay May Stage 3: Alternative Development 1 11/19/14 3/31/15 Stage4: Public Evaluation OfAkernattves 4/8115 5/19/15 1 __Stages: SelectlobofPreferred Scenado 9 /20/15 6/2/_ 15 TeMative: r —���— i�- - -- St -' S _ 1, _ 6/3/15 P City CauncUCheEk -!n - - -, Development Partner Implementation Cam letian ! - Mld4ebruory Master Developer Process AdWes 1EGENIJ Q Council Milestones E==: Process Steps 6 StokeholderlMeractiveMilestones 14 EXHIBIT C BUDGET Consultant and Scope of Work Maximum Approved Sub- Contract Contractors Amount 1) Frauenshuh, Inc. Master developer, project coordination and execution of $50,000.00 team deliverables 2) Opus Project and construction cost estimating, schedule and $7,500.00 feasibility reviews 3) Opus A/E Engineering concept plans, feasibility analysis and design $5,000.00 support 4) Reynolds Urban Master planning studies, alternative development $30,000.00 Design scenarios, massing/modeling 5) Confluence Public engagement workshops facilitation and public use $10,000.00 visioning and definition 6) DJR Architects Architectural consulting, adjacency analysis, team process $5,000.00 and input during development of alternative scenarios 7) Project Expenses Routine expenses for travel, workshop supplies, $3,000.00 reproductions, etc. Total = $110,500.00 178758v4 13 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION 9 J OVA M To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item h% VIII. B. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Parking Permit Policy And Fees, Ordinance No. 2014 -19 Amending Chapter2 and 24 Parking Fees, 50th & France Commercial District (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) Action Requested: Approve Ordinance 2014 -19 and authorize the City Manager to implement the revised parking policy effective January 1, 2015. Request that the second reading be waived. Information / Background: In April 2014, significant changes were made to the parking regulations at the 50th and France public parking ramps with a goal of increasing their longevity and efficiency. Further refinements were anticipated after the new regulations had been tested. After six months of experience, City staff recently held a listening session to hear comments about the impact of the new policy and suggestions to better meet the needs of employees and customers. Employees and businesses alike are concerned with the cost of the permits. At this time, the cost of monthly parking permits is proposed to remain unchanged at $10.00 per month. While a tiered rate structure was originally contemplated, it is not supported by the businesses at this time. Based on feedback from employees, businesses and the business association, two changes are recommended for 2015: 1) Allow employees to park in a portion of the South Ramp rooftop. While this is the most heavily used ramp, the rooftop is used less frequently. The portion of the rooftop south of the exit stair tower contains approximately 40 spaces that are proposed to be used by employees or customers on a first -come first -served basis. This is not anticipated to adversely impact customer parking in the ramp. 2) Issue daily parking permits to address the needs of temporary employees and customers /clients with full day appointments. Some businesses requested that daily permits be available to accommodate unique circumstances that are routinely encountered: employees from other locations temporarily filling shifts, company- wide staff training where off -site employees spend the day at 50th and France; and clients who have City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 all day appointments for service. These situations occur today with vehicles often parked in violation and at risk of being ticketed. By issuing daily permits and allowing long -term customers to park in designated areas, the more convenient stalls should be available to the short -term customer. As with the monthly and annual permits, this program is intended only for businesses located in Edina who contribute to the City's tax base of the commercial district. These changes are supported by the 501h and France Business Association. Staff recommends that these changes be approved in November 2014 so that they can be publicized when permits are renewed in December. These changes are anticipated to be effective January 1, 2015. Attachments: Ordinance No. 2014 -19 Proposed Parking Permit Policy with diagram of designated parking locations ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 2 AND 24 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING PERMITS FOR MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Schedule A (fees and charges) to Code Section 2 -274 is amended by adding the following fee: Article Chapter Purpose of fee or charges Amount Terms and and Division 'Section Article 24 -397 Daily Parking permit 1$ 0.00 Packet of 10 ep rmits VIII, (f� division 5 Section 2. Section 24 -397 of the Edina City Code is amended. by moving the content of subsection (f) to subsection (g) and by adding a new subsection (f) to read as,follows: (fl Daily Parking Permit Individuals employed and businesses located within the 50' and France Commercial Area of the city may be issued by the manager or the manager's designee a daily parking permit for the use of employees, guests or customers. An eligible applicant shall submit an application and pay the fee set forth in section 2 -724 of the city code. Vehicles visibly displaying the daily permit in the rear window and complying with the provisions of this section are eligible to park in stalls designated by the city manager in excess of the posted time limits. Daily permits are valid for single -use only. Section 3. This ordinance is effective January 1, 2015. 178895v1 First Reading: November 3, 2014 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 2 178895vl James B. Hovland, Mayor v�tA'.:.� CITY OF. EDINA 50" and France Commercial Area Employee Permit Parking Policy Background The Edina City Code (Section 24 =397) allows the City to issue parking permits to employees of businesses located at 50th and France in Edina. The City Manager is authorized -to designate specific locations for the employee parking. The employee parking locations "shall be those that are least convenient for patrons of the businesses located in the 50th and France Commercial Area." The January 21, 2.014 Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study identifies several concerns with current employee parking practices and includes several recommendations to better manage parking in the public facilities. Employee Permit Parking Zones Employee vehicles that display a valid permit will be allowed to park in designated areas of the public parking ramps in excess of the.posted time limits. Parking is available on a first come -first served basis. Issuance of -a permit is no guarantee that a parking stall will be available at any specific time or in any specific ramp. Employee vehicles without a permit will be ticketed. Employee vehicles, not parked in the designated locations will be ticketed. Overnight parking is not allowed unless the vehicle displays the.proper permit and is located in designated stalls. The lowest level of the.South Ramp will be posted "employee only" Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM. This area is available for both employee and customer parking at all other times. Permit Type Anticipated Fee Location No. of Stalls Available Maximum No. Permits* Employee $10 per month South Ramp, lower level, covered 80 990 South Ramp, rooftop level, south of stair tower 40 94 Middle Ramp, 3` level, rooftop Middle Ramp, 2nd level, covered 90 North Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop, lower, 1St and 2nd levels, covered 252 Employee or 1 Per day Same as above Not limited Guest Overnight for business vehicle for 50th $50 per North Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop & France month North Ramp, 2nd level, covered 10 10 (Edina) business Total = I &26566 I 1,000 * The maximum number of permits issued may be adjusted based on actual usage. DRAFT Adopted by City Council (MaF6h4November 3, 2014) Page I 1 Level 3 — 114 rooftop 5 -hour customer only (74) 5 -hour customer & employee (40) Level 2 - 110 covered 5 -hour customer only Level 1 - 110 covered 2 -hour customer only Level 3 - 94 rooftop 5 -hour customer & employee Level 2 - 90 covered 3 -hour customer & employee Level 1- 90 covered 3 -hour customer only Level 3 - 72 rooftop 5 -hour customer & employee Level 2 - 72 covered 2- hour customer & employee Level 1 - 72 covered 2 -hour customer & employee Lower Level — 80 covered Lower Level - 45 covered Employee only (M -F 8 to 4 PM); 2 -hour customer & employee other times customer & employee France Ave — 20 surface 2 -hour customer only Clancy lot — 36 surface 1 -hour customer only 50th near Lunds —15 surface 1 -hour customer only 51St alley way — 6 surface 1 -hour customer only Yellow highlights and °*r;A/ underline indicates proposed change from 2014 policy. November 3, 2014 South Middle North Surface Total Customer Only = X34 294 90 0 77 . &(4 461 4M45% Employee Only* = 80 0 0 0 80 8% Customer & Employee = 040 184 262 0 4469-- 486 43A 47% Total = 414 274 262 77 1,027 100 * During peak daytime period only Additional Background: In addition to the public parking stalls, there are an additional 305 stalls located on private property for employee & customer use. The South Ramp is the most heavily used ramp but the rooftops of all ramps are used with less frequency. There are approximately 1,000 employees in this area of the City. Approximately 750 employees are working during the busiest shift of the holiday season. Approximately 680 permits were issued in2014. Yellow highlights and °*r;A/ underline indicates proposed change from 2014 policy. November 3, 2014 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 3, 2014 o Le ��� 0 • ,��RPORA�F'v • 1888 Agenda Item #: VIII. C. Subject: Resolution No. 2014-113 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014-113 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-113 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Fund $369.80 Dated: November 3, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Officer Training Expense Reimbursement James B. Hovland, Mayor 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , City Clerk w91N��1� �•l CORPORt'��O leas; To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IX. A. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 �,'-AIP,lf7 -VTz ,r' /N Plezv -q, Larkin Homan ATTORNEYS October 21, 2014 Mayor Hovland and Councilmembers City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina MN, 55424 Larldn Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 GENERAL: 952- 835 -3800 FAX: 952 - 896 -3333 WEB: www.larkinhofman.com Re: Citizens to Preserve the Edina Regional Medical District Beacon Interfaith Supportive Housing Project, 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, MN Dear Mayor Hovland and Councilmembers: We represent the Citizens to Preserve the Edina Regional Medical District ( "CPERMD ") with regard t0'opp09iti6n -46 the'City's'Compreliensive Plan, amendment. and rezonin&actions' onibehalf of thdi 1' TrAdMith loWilg:Collaborative; (``.Beacon'. :')•.supportive housing projectaocated at 3330.West:66th "Street (the'" Projodf )•:in the City.of Edina ( the: -'City ") °.:,CPERMD. is •comprised-,of r' bit owners ' b ti , p � y� � " " °' � -� ,- usiness'otwners and.tetiants�ofthe�hdina Regional: Medical District (the ±: "District ") land was "fotined to advocate for the ongoing integrity of the. District as one• of the, state's - premier medical districts. INTRODUCTION Tonight, the City Council is scheduled to make a decision on the final rezoning of the Project and the proposed planned unit development. This letter is intended to highlight ongoing defects in the City's Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning process, including the City's inability to comply with Minnesota's automatic approval statutes. This letter is also intended to provide the City with notice that Beacon has failed to obtain the necessary funding sources for the Project and, as a result, the Project has little likelihood of success. DISCUSSION Final Rezoning is in Violation of State Law Due to Conflict with the Comprehensive Plan As oftoday, the City'-s Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow the Project to proceed has not yet b'eeii +•approved by?the Metropolitan Council .(the "Met'Council ") and the City's considerati on, of the l i1al'cezoning -;0 d' final- development plans "Ig -not authorized under Minnesota law. According to Met'.C'oi rich staff; <the Comprelensive Plan amendment is not subject'•to.administrative review:and %ill:likely•not be heard by the fiill,council :until 'mid= November. Until Met Council.approves:the Cify's Comprehensive Plan arendment, the City is prohibited under: state.law.from: adopting the. rezoning., ' •; .. • C Mayor Hovland and Councilmembers October 21; 2014 Page 2 Under Minnesota Statute, the City cannot implement or adopt "M official control ... which is in conflict with" the City's Comprehensive Plan. Minn. Stat. § 473.865 (emphasis added). Any changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be reviewed and approved by the Met Council before the proposed amendment can become effective and before any rezoning can be permitted under Minnesota law. Minn. Slat. §§ 462.355, 473.864(2). Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan must first be properly amended, then, and only then, can the City consider rezoning. Minn. Stat. § 473.175, subd. 2. The proposed final rezoning for the Project is an official control in direct contradiction to the City's Comprehensive Plan and cannot be considered until the City follows the state - mandated procedures to amend the Comprehensive Plan as described above. An,approval to rezone for the Project in :conflict with the City's current Comprehensive Plan language, and prior to the proper approval of the proposed amendment, violates Minnesota law. The Comprehensive Plan amendment must be completed and take effect prior to the consideration of a rezoning proposal. Under Minnesota's Under Minnesota Statutes section 15.99, the. Project maybe automatically approved under Minnesota law if the City does not - render a final decision within 60 days (or by the extended deadline under statute). More specifically, the Project may be approved if the City fails to deny the application. Here, the City is unable to render a final decision .by the October 22, 2014 deadline, and the City must deny the rezoning application to avoid risking a statutory default approval. The proposed'rezoning requires the passage of ordinance 2014 -17. Under City Code, "[e]very ordinance shall receive two readings before the council prior to final adoption." City Code § 2- 416(emphasis added) .,.. Because the City will be unable to hold a second reading until afi.er the Comprehensive,Plan amendment is approved by the Met Council, it cannot render a final.decision within tho�60 -day period. Therefore, unless the Project is denied, the Project maybe deemed to be approved on October 22nd under Minnesota Statutes section 15.99. While the outcome would be, similar to approving the application by council action, the application would be.approved under secti )h :.15:99 as proposed `i; f Lea n, and ,�ith6ut•.aii�:co,ndition:,. ir<eo ed by the: Cit ; We t► .rge the Cite to deny the rezoning application, which will avoid'the risk of an automatic approval under the statute. A denial will not preclude resubmittal of the application and would allow a thoughtful and deliberate decision- making process. Beacon has Failed to Obtain Necessary Funding for the Proieet and Will not Again be Eligible Until 2015 On October 17, 2014, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ( "MHFA ") released its recommendations'for funding through the MHFA consolidated RFP program. See attached 2014 Minnesota Housing Multifamily RFP: Consolidated Funding Recommendations. The funding RFP includes multiple sources of financing, including the Housing Infrastructure Bonds ( "HIB ") program and Local Housing Incentive Account Program ( "LHIA "), which consists of Metropolitan Mayor Hovland and Councilmembers October 21, 2014 Page 3 Council (the "Met Council ") funding sources. Beacon ha's failedao secure any fundingfor the Project through the RFP process, from either MHFA or Met Council. The MHFA's recommendation to not fund the Project is expected to be adopted by the Minnesota Housing Board on October 23, 2014. Based on Beacon's failure to obtain necessary funding for the Project, it appears that the Project has little or no likelihood of success. As Beacon' representatives rioted at the September 2, 2014. City, Council meeting, the current funding cycle was unique in that it included approximately $100 million dollars in funding, far exceeding most years. Future funding cycles will be far more. competitive due to smaller amounts of available funding, and given the Project's recent rejection, it is..unlikely that the Project evil increase its competitiveness in the,folloNVing years. Even if there was an increase in funding sources available, the Project will not be eligible for consideration of funding through these programs until this time next year. Without funding from the Met Council or the MHFA through these key funding accounts, Beacon representatives have acknowledged that the Project will likely stall for at least a year. The prospect of a stalled project of this size, located in a high profile location in the center of the District raises significant concerns. Among these concerns is the loss of a significant development opportunity, as developers have expressed interest in the Project site for medical. and office -type investments consistent v; ith the intent of the District. We encourage the City Council to deny the rezoning application and work with Beacon to find a more suitable location. in the City that NAll offer the Project a more competitive application for funding in the future. CONCLUSION It is apparent that there is no urgency for the City Council to make a final decision on the Project at this time. The Project has failed to secure necessary funding from the N4HFA and the Met Council and is unable to proceed without this funding. Moreover, making a hasty City Council decision prior to receiving approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment is not.authorized under state law and exceeds the City's authority. The City Council should deny the application tonight to avoid the risk of automatic approval. If the City fails to deny the Project, Beacon representatives have admitted that the Project will be stalled until alternative funding sources can be identified, which seems unlikely given the Project's recent lack of competitiveness. The District, however, is continuing to thrive and attract investment, and neither the City nor the District can afford to be plagued by the uncertainty associated with the stalled Project site. We encourage the City to deny the Project applications and reverse the Comprehensive Plan amendment to restore the integrity of the.District. Denial of the Project will allow the City to work with Beacon.to identify an alternative site within the City that will be viable for the proposed development and more competitive while seeking funding. Mayor Hovland and Councilmembers October 21, 2014 Page 4 If you have any questions about this letter or the information above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert C. Long, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgr n Ltd. Direct Dial: 952 -896 -3232 DiNct Fax:, 952- 842 -1779 Email: k rlong @larkinhoffman.com Enclosures cc: Scott Neal, City Manager Roger -Knutson, City. Attorney John Baker, Greene Espel 4824 - 5840 -3360, V. I Heather Braniain From: js8778 @gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014.8;11 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Jim Stromberg Organization: Unknown Website: 3930 W. 49th St. Address 1: Address 2: 3930 W. 49th St. City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: js8778@&m ail.com. Phone: 651- 307 -3940 Referrer: google Message: TO: Mayor and City Council I watched the City Council meeting last night on Ch. 16, and want to pass on my 'thank -you' to both Council and Mayor. I was very proud to be an Edina resident last evening. You were extremely kind and professional throughout the meeting - in some cases when there was some obvious emotion involved on the part of citizens. I was especially impressed on your conduct and skills as you negotiated through the discussion and decision concerning the Valley View road project. You listened carefully, responded respectfully, and finally made the decision - all the while explaining exactly why the decision you were making was the correct one - even though some residents were bound to be unhappy with that decision. I was very proud of how you handled that item, as well as the rest of the night's agenda. Thank you for representing us in.such an "Edina" fashion! 'Signed', Jim i Heather Braniain From: Dan Dunn <dandunn6l @hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11 :24 AM To:. Edina Mail; joni bennettl2@ comcast. net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague@edinarealty.com;.swensonannl@gmail.com Subject: Valley View reconstruction project Mr. Mayor and Council Members, I watched last nights public hearing on the proposed Valley View reconstruction from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace. I live with my wife Ty and our son Colin at 6928 Moccasin Valley Rd. While not currently impacted it seems the project will extend at some point to include our property. Has anybody ever counted the number of bike riders on any given day that use Valleyview? I walk this road all the time and do not see bike riders very often. Is this a build it and they will come type of a idea? Also parking is allowed on Valley View. Your city engineer was mistaken when he stated it was not allowed. Parking Is allowed on the wider side by my house, which is the south side. Even down where the road narrows by Sally Lane and Comanche Ct, there are no signs prohibiting parking. I think this error by your city engineer is a important one. We have had large gatherings at our house requiring people to park on Valley View. I have spent a good deal of time and money landscaping this part of my property. Prior to my purchase the lot on the other side of my fence was overgrown with small trees, weeds and buckthorn due to neglect of previous owner. I realize.that this a right of way for Valley View but the landscaping project has enhanced the area. Will I be compensated at all for this? I don't think enough time was spent regarding the petitions that were signed and I agree with the testifier that suggested the slide of the individuals signing the petition was very underrepresented. I was disappointed by your vote as I was about the decision to close the Fred and will make my disappointment known at the ballot box. Respectfully, Dan Dunne 1 i Heather Braniain From: Greg Engen <greg.engen @aimia.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina Mountain Bike Park Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, I am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France-to-be- preserved as park land. It is is a perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. Off -road cycling is a low- environmental = impact healthy recreation that is growing quickly- up to 35 million annual participants. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation. The City of Edina has a unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through a network of volunteers making the primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Greg Engen GREGORY A. ENGEN VICE PRESIDENT, CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS AIMIA U.S. r�een en o,aimia.com 1405 Xenium Lane North, Suite 150 / Minneapolls, MN 55441 / US D +1763 445 3242 / M +1 612 743 4750 J Heather Branigin From: Patrick'Frimat < Patrick .FRIMAT @rsivideotech.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 20141:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mountain bike Park in Edina Dear Mayor Hovland acid Edina City Council, I am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France to be preserved as park land. It is is a perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. Off -round cycling is a low- environmental - impact healthy recreation that is growing quickly- up to 35 million annual participants. It is.a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation. The City of Edina has a unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through a network of volunteers making the primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Patrick Frimat 5504 Dever Drive Edina, MN 55424 651955 7888 1 Heather Branigin From: Kristen Christianson <Kristen @resimplifiedmn.com> Sent: .Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council re: 40th and France park land... Dear.. Mayor Hovland and Edina.City.Council, I am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France to be preserved as park land. It is is a_perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. _Off-round cycling is a low - environmental- impact healthy recreation that is growing quickly- up to 35 million annual participants. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation. The City of Edina has a unique opportunity to create a- valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through a network of volunteers making the primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Kristen Christianson, Realtor, GRI Keller Williams Integrity Realty Real Estate SIMPLIFIED 612- 616 -8591 kristen@resimplifiedmn.com Our numbers speak for themselves... 905 of our business came from referrals O Average 37 drays, on market for listings - market average is 97 days p 98% average sales to list price - market average is 95% 0 49% of homes under contract within 1 week 85% of homes under coniract within 30 days i Heather Braniain From: Paula Colestock <paulacolestock @yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mountain Bike Trails in Edina Mayor Hovland, It would be great to have a mountain bike trail in Edinal The Edina Cycling Team started last year with 15 members and currently has 35 members from our middle schools and the high school. interest in the sport is exploding and there is more interest than ever for all age groups to mountain bike. There are many areas that could be utilized for a mountain bike trail. Most recently there has been discussion about making Webber park an official mountain bike trail. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Paula Colestock 6613 Southcrest Drive Edina 1 Heather Braniain From: L Kondrick <Ikondrick @yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2;42 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; oshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); , jonibennettl2 @comc6st.net; Edina Mail - Cc: Laura Kondrick Subject: Buckthorn Removal in the Budget Urgent Council Members, ,___Please take the problem of invasive BUCKTHORN VERY SERIOUSLY and include in you Parks budget for the coming year. Buckthorn requires diligent eradication to stopthe spread. Think zebra mussels, kudzu, and millefeuille: -- The parks on the west side, like Bredesen, are rife with buckthorn and overtake paths and obscure views of marches, creeks and other water features. If you want to beautify Edina, beautify your parks flora first. Buckthorn should be the Park's budget number one priority and l could not find it anywhere in the budget. THIS MUST BE A PRIORITYI It is an expensive endeavor and should be budgeted over a number of years to be effective. Please do the right thing to preserve native flora and fauna from the onslaught of buckthorn. If you do not know much about buckthorn, google it. Laura Kondrick Ikondrick vahoo.com 1 Heather Branigin From: Marie Jackson <mariedjackson @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:42 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Resident Urgent Request Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, I am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France to be preserved as park land. It is is a perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. Off -round cycling is a low - environmental- impact healthy recreation that is.growing quickly- up to 35 million annual participants. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation. The City of Edina has a unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through a network of volunteers making the primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Marie D. Jackson 4604 Drexel Ave Edina, MN 55424 i Heather Branigin From: christianson9 @gmail.com Sent: Wednesday ;`October 22, 2014 3:21 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council re: 40th and France park land... Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France to be preserved as park land. It is is a perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. Off -road cycling is a low - environmental- im pact- healthy recreation-that-is growing quickly- up to-35 million annual participants. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation. The City of -Edina has a unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing .organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through a network.of volunteers making the 'primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Steve Christianson 5121 Indianola Ave 612.859.6634 Sent from Windows Mail 1 Heather Braniain From: Laura < Ikondrick @yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Buckthorn Removal in the Budget Urgent Not good enough. I want a reply from a council member who can advocate for this issue. Sent from my.iPhone > On Oct 22, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Edina Mail <mall @ Edina MN.gov> wrote: > Dear Laura, > Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. > I have forwarded your message to Mayor Hovland. > If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. > Lynette Biunno, Receptionist > 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 > IblunnoA Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov > ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business > - - - -- Original Message---- - > From: L Kondrick imailto :Ikondrick @yahoo:com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014.2:42 PM > To: swensonannl @gmail.com; oshsoraeue @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); ionibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail > Cc: Laura Kondrick. > Subject: Buckthorn Removal in the Budget Urgent > > Council Members, > Please take the problem of invasive BUCKTHORN VERY SERIOUSLY and include in you Parks budget for the coming year. Buckthorn requires dillgent,eradication to stop the spread. Think zebra mussels, kudzu, and millefeuille. > The parks on the west side, like Bredesen, are rife.with buckthorn and overtake paths and obscure views of marches, creeks and other water features. If you want to beautify Edina, beautify your parks flora first. > Buckthorn should be the Park's budget number one priority and I could not find it anywhere in the budget. > THIS MUST BE A PRIORITYI It is an expensive endeavor and should be budgeted over a number of years to be effective. > Please do the right -thing to preserve native flora and fauna from the onslaught of buckthorn. 1 > If you do not know much about buckthorn, google it. > Laura Kondrick > Iondrick @vahoo.com 2 Heather Braniain From: Murnan, Shawn <Shawn.Murnan @bestbuy.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fw: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council re: 40th and France,park land... Dear City Council, I absolutely agree with Kristen. What an asset this would be to Edina. Please do the right thing. Shawn Murnan 4223 Oakdale Ave From: Kristen Christianson <Kristen @resimplifiedmn.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:15 PM From: Kristen Christianson Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:17 PM To: mail @edinamn;gov Subject: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council re: 40th and France park land... Dear Mayor. Hovland and Edina City Council, I am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres. at 40th +France to be preserved as park land. It is is a perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. Off -round cycling is a low - environmental- impact healthy recreation that is growing quickly- up to 35 million annual participants. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation- ': The City of Edina has a unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through a network of volunteers making the primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Kristen Christianson, Realtor, GRI Keller Williams Integrity Realty Real Estate SIMPLIFIED 612- 616 -8591 kristen resimplifiedmn.com i Heather Branigin From: Jasmine Navy . <JNavy @walkermethodist.org> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 201410:44 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: re; Veteran's Day - Mayor Request Good Morning! I am writing to inquiry about Tuesday, Nov. 11th, Veteran's Day. Here.;at Walker MethdositCare Suites in Edina we are trying to. arrange` a Veteran's Day Ceremony (Program) for our residents and i wanted to see if It would be possible for our city Mayor to volunteer 'his time,, Tuesday,- Nov.- I1th - in- the, morning -or- any -time that -day that may work in -his - - - schedule. If the Mayor is available we would like for him to read 'The President's Veteran's Day Proclamation' and meet/greet with our veterans as well as stand for a group picture and that would be all. Possible hand each one a poppy. Could you let me know if this would be possible at all? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks so much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Is there anyone in particular for whom I should try to contact directly? - Jasmine Navy Follow Walker Methodist! walker methodist Care' Suites Confidentiality Notice: The Information_ contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message Is not the Intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you.have received this communication iri error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting It from your computer. Thank you. Walker Methodist. Follow Walker Methodist!": era Lker roethodiat Confidentiality Notice; The information contained In this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message Is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this - 1 Heather Braniain From: William J. Otteson <botteson @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11 :53 AM Toi ' Edina Mail Cc::.. Liz Otteson Subject: Let's Build a Mountain Bike Park in Edina Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council: I am writing as an Edina citizen and mountain biking enthusiast to urge the city to purchase the undeveloped land available at 40th & France to be preserved as parkland and developed as a mountain bike park. My wife Liz and I live near Todd Park, and our family enjoys mountain biking. There are many great trail facilities around the metro area, but most of them are far away and require a substantial drive from Edina to places like Champlin (Elm Creek), Eagan (Lebanon Hills), Savage (Murphy - Hanrahan), or Victoria (Carver Park Reserve). Having a sustainable mountain bike trail facility in Edina would promote a growing, low- environmental- impact, healthy.recreational activity and add to. the already- impressive amenities that make our community such an att ractive place to live, work, and raise a family. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy'means of outdoor recreation right in our own backyard. Existing not- for - profit organizations such as the International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) and the Minnesota Off -Road Cyclists (MORC) are dynamic volunteer - driven groups that have led the building of trails elsewhere in the metro and throughout Minnesota with very little development cost. Thank you for your consideration of this position and for your leadership in our community. Sincerely, Bill Otteson 4545 Oxford Avenue Edina, MN 55436 botteson@gMail.com 612 7296 -3639 3. Ir , Ewing Marlon KAUFFM-AN Foundation Dear Mayor Hovland, Thank you for attending the 2014 Mayors Conference .on Entrepreneurship: Making an Entrepreneurial City. I hope you not only enjoyed the conference but also left inspired and equipped with new ideas:,for how you can support entrepreneurs and makers in your community. - - -- - . -- In an effort to be a continuingresource to'you, the Kauffman Foundation has planned a series of follow -ups from the conference. Please be watching for new materials from us in the coming months. In the meantime, do not hesitate to contact me or any of my colleagues at the Foundation who you met in Louisville for,assistance. I look forward to staying in touch. ;Bishes Was a �leo,5ure- -6 me4 me k � �t � cen 0`s- F Wiens Director, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Ewing Marion KAUFFMAN Fof-ifidation' Jason Wiens Policy Director 4801 ROCKHILL ROAD KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 641 1 0 -204 6 TEL: 816 - 932 -1115 iwiens @kauffman.org www.kauffman.org v Heather.Braniain A.: From: David Davison <dd01 @annben.us> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 201411:57 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Josh Sprague Subject: Request for Opinion Attachments: HF3618DP.pdf; 220ct14a.pdf Josh Sprague requested that I send this to the entire City Council. Attached is a request (file 220ct14a.pdf) for consideration by city attorneys of cities along or near the MN &S tracks. Also attached is a copy of the Dan Patch Gag Rule (file HF3618DP.pdf). Please consider supporting this request. Thank you. David Davison (dd01 @annben.us) This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http: / /www.avast.com i HF3618DP.doc The Dan Patch Gag Rule 2002, Regular Session CHAPTER 393- H.F.No. 3618 22 Mar 11 An act relating to ... prohibiting certain actions in connection with the Dan Patch commuter rail line ... Sec. 85. [DAN PATCH COMMUTER RAIL LINE; PROHIBITIONS.] Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION.] For,purposes of this section, "Dan Patch commuter rail line" means the commuter rail line between Northfield and Minneapolis identified in the metropolitan council's transit 2,020 master plan as the Dan Patch line. Subd. 2. [METROPOLITAN. COUNCIL; PROHIBITIONS.] The metropolitan council must not take any action or spend any money for study, planning, preliminary engineering, final design, or construction . for the Dan Patch commuter rail line. The council must remove all references, other than references for historical purposes, to the Dan Patch commuter rail line from any future revisions to the council's transportation development "guide and the council's regional transit master plan. Subd. 3. [COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION.) The commissioner of transportation must not expend any money for study, planning, preliminary engineering, final design, or construction for the Dan Patch commuter rail line. The commissioner must remove all references, other than references for historical purposes, to the Dan Patch commuter rail line from any future revisions to the state transportation plan and the commissioner's commuter rail system plan.. Subd. 4. [REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITIES.) No regional rail authority may expend any money for study, planning, preliminary engineering, final design, or construction for the Dan Patch commuter rail line. 22 October 2014 To Mayors, City Managers, & City Attorneys of Cities along the MN &S (Dan Patch) Tracks Subject: Getting to Light Rail Background The Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan, created by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (DOT) in February 2010, describes an intercity rail corridor that includes the portion of the Minneapolis, Northfield, and Southern (MN &S) tracks that run north- south through Saint Louis Park, Edina, Bloomington, and Savage. The plan awaits federal funding. When built, the Minneapolis/Mankato corridor will have stations in Minneapolis and Mankato, with no stops between. Trains will move rapidly, as fast as 80 miles per hour, along the upgraded track's, and freight operations will increase significantly with the opening of the gateway (a new bridge across the Minnesota River) to the Port of Savage. Dan Patch Study' The Dan Patch feasibility study, 2001, is a plan for commuter rail service between Minneapolis and;Northfield, with heavy, fast trains along the MN &S tracks. Dan Patch Gag Rule In 2002 the Minnesota legislature approved the Dan Patch Gag Rule, attached, which states that none of the following agencies could study, plan, engineer, design, or construct the Dan Patch commuter rail fine: neither [1] Metropolitan Council (Met Council), nor [2] the DOT, nor [3] regional_rail authorities. Light Rail Prohibited by Met Council Building intercity rail will upgrade the MN &S tracks through Saint Louis Park, Edina, Bloomington, and Savage. None of these communities (nor others along the MN &S tracks as far south as Northfield) can contemplate supplementary or alternative passenger rail service, including light rail, because of the Metropolitan Council's interpretation of the Gag Rule. Conflict of Interpretations According to the legal department of the Met Council, the Gag Rule prohibits the planning, etc., of any passenger service along the MN &S tracks, including not only commuter rail but also light rail. By contrast, the legal department of the DOT interprets the Gag Rule as applying only to the written plan (the Dan Patch study) for commuter rail between Minneapolis and Northfield; accordingly, the DOT asserts that the Gag Rule does not apply to intercity rail. Trains and train speeds are similar for intercity rail and commuter rail, but the two are distinguished by the distance between stations, fifty miles or so for intercity rail and approximately five miles for commuter rail. Need for Resolution of Conflict The interests of the communities along the MN &S tracks between Minneapolis and Northfield would be well served by a resolution of the conflict between the interpreta- tions of state law in favor of the DOT's legal department. If so resolved, the Met Council would be empowered to include studies of light rail along the MN &S tracks. Light rail would have convenient stations approximately two miles apart and would run temporally separated from freight or other operations such as intercity rail. Roles of Attorney General and City Attorneys The Minnesota Attorney General has the authority to interpret Minnesota law, but does not respond to requests for opinions from private parties. It does, however, respond to requests for opinions not only from executive officers and legislative bodies, but also from attorneys for local governments. All the communities along the MN &S tracks between Minneapolis and Northfield have standing in this issue, as well as residents of these and nearby communities, because they are all affected by the Met Council's adverse interpretation of the pernicious Gag Rule. Request Accordingly, I request that the City Attorneys in communities along and close to the MN &S tracks consult with one another and request an opinion from the Attorney General that resolves the conflict between the Met Council and the DOT on the interpretation of the Gag Rule. Hopefully, the opinion would favor an interpretation that would allow the Met Council to include studies of light rail along the MN &S tracks among its other plans. Yours sincerely, David Davison, 6716 Galway Drive, Edina, MN 55439 Heather Branigin From: Nick Dzandzara <NickD @consulting - sdc.com> sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 6;11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 15 acres at 40th + France Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France to be preserved as park land. It is is a perfect location for a mountain bike park which is a growing sport. Off -round cycling is a low - environmental- impact healthy- recreation that is growing- quickly- up to- 35_million-annual _participants. It is a sport that is accessible to kids through older adults and promotes healthy outdoor recreation. The City of Edina has a unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. There are existing organizations like IMBA and MORC that build trails through, a network of volunteers making the primary cost of this park the land acquisition with very little development cost. Please make the. right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Thank you, Nick Dzandzara 5208 Halifax Ave S Edina 1 Heather_Branigin From: liza schwab <lcschwab @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 7:09 AM To: dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; Edina Mail Subject: We have a problem Good morning Debbie and James, You both know me well...Debbie, you know me and my family for many reasons, Richfield Ambassadors, meetings, out and about,,etc... Mayor Hovland, unfortunately, you only know me from Edina city hall meetings when lam trying to fight a couple redevelopment issues. Anyway, as border cities, we sometimes:need to come together and figure out issues. As you both know, I live on the border of Edina /Richfield, right behind Cub Foods Edina. My family and I have chosen to live here because of the quiet community of Richfield with all the conveniences of the Southdale area. So, here is where we have a problem and I am looking to you mayors for help. As you both probably know, there is a homelessness issue, in both our cities. I often see homeless sleeping in various green areas around Southdale, Target, and even the Galleria. Where our problem comes in is when we see Edina police.officers dropping off the homeless people in our neighborhood. I. understand many don't know what to do with the homeless, but I believe we as cities can work together to find a better solution. Many times over the past several years, either my husband or I have witnessed an Edina police officer pull up to the Edina /Richfield border... usually, 1 house away from mine,, and drop them off. They usually are without shoes, money, or a direction to go: Very, very recently my husband Steve, was out and about and saw it happening. He confronted the Edina Police officer to see what was going on. He asked why he was dropping him off, the Edina police officer said, 'This is what we do'. He, dropped him off at the corner of 68th and Xerxes. Oftentimes, our family has given these homeless men a pair of shoes so they can get on a bus, bus fare, and food. Our hearts are for the ones who need help, so we are ok helping them, in fact we enjoy helping them. However, it is disheartening to us how often Edina is dropping off homeless into Richfield. Like I said, we have witnessed it many times, but I know it is happening even when we don't see it. There was even an article about it in the newspaper, where the Edina police even said they dropped a homeless man off in Richfield after he attacked an employee at the Southdale Library ... per his request. How can we help you out with this problem? We don't have any issue with helping out, we will gladly drive them downtown to a shelter, give them bus fare, feed them, whatever -they need to get to where they want, but we just ask they aren't just dropped oTwith nowhere to go on our corner or any other corner on the border of Richfield /Edina. Homelessness is a problem, there isn't a solution, at least I can think of, but I think we can work together on this issue. Liza Schwab The Outspoken Mom Wife, Mother, and Blogger Extraordinaire Icschwab@comea'st.net www.outgpokenmomblog com Andrei Kittelson From: Andrei Kittelson Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 5:24 PM To: 'mail @EdinaMN.gov' Cc: Paula Kittelson (kittelsonpaula @gmail.com); Jackie Grandstrand oackieshannon @hotmail.com); Grandstrand, Kirk ( Kirk.Grandstrand @g(eeksquad.com) Subject: Concerned Edina Parent - Another School Shooting Dear Mayor, as I am sure you saw, there was another school shooting just outside of Seattle today. I.was born in 1976, and] remember "shock story" they taught us in social studies was the shooting that took place at the University :of Texas at Austin. - In junior high, the kids and teachers were mortified that-such a thing could- happen- here -in- the -US as -we_._ _ reviewed that section of material. I am sad to'say that an event like that has.been common place.these days, and I think Americans are acutely aware of that. Yet, nothing really has been done about it. In fact, it seems like our only means to deal with it is hope ... hope it does not happen to you or your children. Hope is not a very good strategy in my view, and not good enough for me. Furthermore, I am sad to say, that I have little to no faith that anything will be done to curtail gun proliferation. The society's obsession with firearms unmistakably and shamefully there, and as long as special interests are legally allowed to influence our political process, I think it is hereto stay. I completely surrender to this reality, and simply accept it. What I.am asking- given that gun proliferation WILL NOT change, have we considered airport style security in schools? Yes ... I mean metal detectors and security screening. I know that l (and many other parents) would gladly pay the taxes to implement this. I know that the prospect of any tax increase sends our people into a frenzy, and it is not good politics for elected officials. However, this is different. It is a small price to pay for potentially saving the life of children, and the people entrusted with their care. I really don't appreciate the feeling of sending my children off to school, and "hoping" they come back. Right now that's all I have. I will mail your office a hard copy of this as well. Thank you, Andrei Kittelson I Director, N. America Sales 1 WD Content Solutions www.westemdigital.com I Office: (612) 216 -0686 1 Mobile: (952) 607 -9982 Heather Branigin From: Andrei Kittelson <Andrei,Kittelson @wdc,com> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 5:24 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Paula Kittelson (kittelsonpaula @gMaiLcom); Jackie Grandstrand oackieshannon @hotmail,com); Grandstrand, Kirk ( Kirk.Grandstrand @geeksquad,com) Subject: Concerned Edina Parent - Another School Shooting Dear Mayor, as I am sure you saw, there was another school shooting just outside of Seattle today. I was born in 1976, and I remember "shock.story" they taught us in social studies was the shooting -that took place at the University of Texas at Austin. In junior high, the kids and teachers were mortified that such a thing could happen here in the US as we reviewed that section of material. I am sad to say that an event like that has been commonplace these days; and I think Americans are acutely aware of that. Yet, nothing really has been done about it. In fact, it seems like our only means to deal with it is hope ... hope it does not happen to you or your children. Hope Is not a very good strategy in my view, and not good enough for me. Furthermore, I am sad to say, that I have little to no faith that anything will be done to curtail gun proliferation. The society's obsession with firearms unmistakably and shamefully there, and as long as special interests are legally allowed to influence our political process, I think it is here to stay. I completely surrender to this reality, and simply accept it. What I am asking — given that gun proliferation WILL NOT change, have we considered airport style security in schools? Yes ... I mean metal.detectors and security screening. I know that I (and many other parents) would gladly pay the taxes to implement this. 1 know that the prospect of any tax increase sends our people into a frenzy, and it is not good politics foi elected officials. However, this is different. It is a small price to pay for potentially saving the life of children, and.the.peoplei entrusted with their care. I really don't appreciate the feeling of sending my children off to school, and :..'hoping" ., they come back. Right now that's all I have. ;. I will mail your office a'hard copy of this as well. Thank you, Andrei Kittelson I Director, N. America Sales I WD Content Solutions www.westemdlailal,com I Office: (612) 216 -0686 I Mobile: (052) 607 -9982 PLEASE NOTE: only an AccessWDTM generated PDF'd Program Letter or Price List/Quote, with the applicable Western Digital (WD) Terms and Conditions, is valid and enforceable against WD with regard to product pricing or participation in a WD sponsored promotional or marketing program. No other form or method of communicating pricing or program terms is authorized by WD. Heather Branigin From: Richard Swenson <swensrw @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 8:15 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Weber Woods - . Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council: I am writing to urge the city to purchase the 15 acres at 40th + France to be preserved as park land. It is a beautiful site that we wish to keep natural. The City of`Edina-has a rare and unique opportunity to create a valuable asset for our community and surrounding communities. Please demonstrate honorable values to our children; make the right decision and purchase this land to be preserved as park. Certainly Edina has enough houses. Thank you, Richard Swenson Heather Branigin Subject: MLC Legislative'Breakfast Location: Plymouth Crowne Plaza (3131 Campus Drive 1,Plymouth, MN 55441) Start: Fri 1 /16/2015 7:30 AM End: Fri 1/16/2015 9 :00 AM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: (none) Organizer:: Charlotte A. de Julio When: Friday, January 16, 2015 7:30 AM -9:00 AM (UTC- 06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: Plymouth Crowne Plaza (3131 Campus Drive Plymouth, MN 55441) Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. Regional Cities Include: • Bloomington • Eden Prairie • Edina • Maple Grove • Minnetonka • Plymouth • Shakopee 1 Heather Braniain From: deanne dubbs <ddubbs @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday,' October 27, 2014 9:35 .PM To: Edina. Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary; Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonann1 ftnail.com Subject: Opposition to Sidewalks on.Maddox;:Lane To: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I attended a.open house meeting on `Sept.- 29th at the Edina Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility.for information about-projects- being considered in- my-neighborhood for 2017: - Although; -the Sept. 8th- letter- -- - announcingthis meeting said that.sidewalks are not included.with every project and that4future questionnaire would help evaluate the need for sidewalks, at the meeting there was a poster map showing the Edina Sidewalks Facility Comprehensive Plan which indicated a sidewalk was planned for my street, Maddox Lane. Let me be clear, I am against the plans to put a sidewalk on my street. I contacted the Engineering Department and was told to attend the Edina Planning Commission Meeting on Oct. 22 "d to voice my concerns. At.the meeting there were residents from 2 other neighborhoods that were against sidewalks on their streets. After listening to our concerns the members of the commission voted to approve the Sidewalk Comprehensive Plan without any changes and to send it on to the Edina City Council for approval. The fact that residents just to the east of Maddox Lane along Valley View had successfully petitioned to have the sidewalks planned for their street be dropped off the plan was known to me before the Oct. 22 "d meeting but since then I have heard of two more neighborhoods, Golf Terrace and Indianola /Juanita Ave. who have had their sidewalks removed from the plan. As the plan is now set for a vote by the Edina City Council on Nov. 3`d , I am concerned that the rush to approve this plan will make it impossible to amend and as I've discovered citizens are mostly unaware of the comprehensive plan and the Living Streets Initiative. The criteria that the Sidewalk Facilities Plan has put forth as pertaining to Maddox Lane were, according to Mark Nolan, most likely measured on the Valley View section of the roadway which has now been dropped off of the plan. Another resident of Maddox Lane, who also attended the Sept. 29th open house, Mr. Paul Hanson, and I have interviewed all residents with property along the 2 block street of Maddox Lane: We asked these citizens if they wanted a sidewalk on our street, whether they felt it would improve the character of the neighborhood, and whether or not they felt safe walking and biking on Maddox Lane. All, but one, of 17 residents are opposed to the sidewalk on Maddox Lane. Almost all were unaware of the,Sidewalk Facilities Plan. There seems to be a rush to implement this'plan before citizens are made aware of it and more seriously, before citizens, can have a voice in the future of the neighborhood In which they live. The Maddox Lane neighborhood is not close to any restaurant, grocery, library, school, or parks with summer programs that one would walk to. The children are bused to school. People out for a walk in our neighborhood are, just that, out for a walk and they can choose any street near around for their pleasure. Would the city need to put cement in every yard to solve a problem that doesn't exist? Has anyone been involved in an accident on Maddox Lane? Would not the residents of the neighborhood have intimate knowledge of what is needed? Is it no longer a government of the people, by the people, for the•people as Lincoln proclaimed at Gettysburg? Are our elected officials listening to the voters that brought them into office? look forward to the Nov. 3`d Edina City Council Public Hearing. It is my sincere hope that the council will amend the Sidewalk Facilities Plan to exclude Maddox Lane. Sincerely, DeAnne Dubbs, 5316 Maddox Lane 2 HeMher&anigin From: Chris Bremer <cbremer101 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 201411:09 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Checking back about your planned meeting with Hennepin County Dear Mayor Hovland, I enjoyed our conversation during the "Walk With the Mayor" at Braemar. It was a beautiful day to be outside! -In -our- conversation- about the- design of the -bump- outs -on Xerxes, you saidyouu..were- seeking -a meeting with the Hennepin County commissioner to discuss the matter. Our Strachauer Park Neighborhood Association board is meeting this Thursday, so I wanted to check back with you to see if there might be any news that I can share with the group. Thanks, and'best regards -- Chris Chris Bremer 6001 Ewing Ave S. 1 October 27, 2014 To: Edina Chamber of Commerce: Lori Syverson 3300 Edinborough Way, Edina, MN 55435 Edina Chief of Police: Dave Nelson Mayor.:. of Edina: 4anf6s Hovland Edina City Manager: Scott Neal 4801 W. 50te St., Edina, MN 55424 I would like to inform you of the unfortunate incident that I encountered in Edina last week. 1) I organize a group of girlfriends who meet monthly to try a restaurant we had not tried before. We were meeting at Salut (50'x' & France). on October 22 at 6:00. I got pulled over by an officer when I safely turned right.from Grange Road to 50'h Street at 4:20. The officer was apparently sitting in the City Hall parking lot monitoring the intersection. I explained that I had not been in that area.in more than a year and saw the sign (no right turn between 7:00 — 9 :00; 4:00 - 6 :00 pm) after I bad entered the intersection. I decided it was less dangerous to proceed than brake and back up. As I have not been stopped or received any type of ticket in more than 20 years, I am very disappointed that I received a ticket and not a verbal warning. I was in no hurry as I had more than an hour to shop and walk around the area. I caused no traffic disruption. I simply did not see the sign until I was in the intersection. I did walk into several shops and would have probably spent several hundred dollars. However, I decided that I was going to spend no money in Edina other than for my meal. The dining group had identified several Edina restaurants to try in the future. After explaining my ticket, one gal indicated that Edina police are "ruthless ", the group decided that we will not frequent any restaurants in Edina in the future. As a result of my ticket, Edina restaurants, shops and the city will now lose several thousands of dollars in revenue. 2) No right turn sign: When I approached the intersection I did not see a typical no right turn on red sign although I did look for one. I have never seen a no right turn between certain hours sign. NO RIGHT:. TURN:;, ON RED. 3) Ticket Fine Value: The officer indicated that I must pay the fine in 30 days and to call the number on the envelope if I have any questions. Because the fine is not indicated on the ticket, I have no option but to call the number on the envelope. This is also very frustrating. I called the number on the envelope, the message indicated "... the citation must be entered in our system which can take in excess of 14 days..." The message indicates that I have 21 days after the ticket is _entered to pay the fine. Of course I have no idea when the fine will be entered and ;whenahe 21 day count starts! It is very frustrating that I am unable to immediately pay the fine. The fact that the fine is not indicated on the ticket and not available in a reasonable amount of time is ridiculous. This requires:a law abiding citizen to vigilantly check for the "citation" to be posted for 2 + weeks. It is it very easy to misplace the citation and completely forget to pay the fine. The officer should provide the fine so it can be paid immediately. I am very frustrated with this event and do not plan to frequent any Edina establishments in the future. I have booked a corporate holiday event at Pinstripes (near Southdale) that I will be cancelling. The value of this ticket has cost Edina establishments and the City of Edina many thousands of dollars all due to an o rcer not giving a la - biding citizen, who made a minor honest- mistake,,a break. Debra E. Lind 7986 Island Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Heather Brani(ph From: Laura <Ikondrick @yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:11 AM -To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Buckthorn Removal in the Budget Urgent , Can the council commit to adding buckthorn to the budget this year? Even if it is just to assess and budget for removal estimate so the council can include actual removal costs for next year and, subsequent years until the buckthorn, !sunder control. — Edina West Condominiums -is - taking -an aggressive approach -to removal.- This year we -began the - first phase-of removal and have .a plan going out several years. The city is propagating the spread if no action is taken. Buckthorn has.marred our parks already. Time for action is overdue. I will send you info from MN Extension. We must educate the community. Sent from my Phone > On Oct 22, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Edina Mail <mail @EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > Dear Laura, • I see that'you addressed your message to the Council members. • I am confident that they will respond to you. > If I can be,of additional assistance to you please contact me. > Lynette Biunno, Receptionist > 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952- 826 -0389 > Ibiunno @EdinaMN.eov -1 www.EdinaMN.eov > ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &;Doing Business > - - - -- Original Message---- - > From: Laura fmaiito:lkondrick @yahoo.coml > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014.3:48 PM > To: Edina Mail, > Subject :, Re: Buckthorn Removal in the Budget Urgent . > Not good enough. I want a reply from a council member who can, advocate for this issue. > Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2014, at 3 :09 PM, Edina Mail <mail@EdinaMN.eov> wrote: >> Dear Laura, >> Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. >> I have forwarded your message to Mayor Hovland. i ' >> If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. >> Lynette Blunno, Receptionist >> 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 >> Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov...For Living, Learning, >> Raising Families & Doing Business >> - - - -- Original Message - - - -- » From: L Kondrick [ma I Ito: lkondrick @yahoo.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:42 PM >> To: swensonannl @gmail.com; oshsprasue@edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle >> (Comcast); ionibennettl20comcast.net; Edina Mail >> Cc: Laura Kondrick >> Subject: Buckthorn Removal in the Budget Urgent >> Council Members, >> Please take the problem of invasive BUCKTHORN VERY SERIOUSLY and include in you Parks.budget for the coming year. Buckthorn requires diligent eradication to stop the spread. Think zebra mussels, kudzu, and millefeuille. >> The parks on the west side, like Bredesen, are rife with buckthorn and overtake paths and obscure views of marches, creeks and other water features. If you want to beautify Edina, beautify your parks flora first. >> Buckthorn should be the Park's budget number one priority and I could not find it anywhere in the budget. THIS MUST BE A PRIORITYI It is an expensive endeavor and should be budgeted over a number of years to be effective. Please do the right thing to preserve native flora and fauna from the onslaught of buckthorn. >> If you do not know much about buckthorn, google it. Laura Kondrick >> Ikondrick @yahoo.com 2 Heather Braniain From: Haapala Niko <Niko.Haapala @formin.fi> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 201410:35 AM To: Haapala Niko Cc: Tieman Anna -Kaisa Subject: Invitation to a Reception on November 5th, 2014 Attachments: Invitation Reception.pdf On the Occasion of the visit of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Parliament of Finland to Minnesota, Please find attached -an invitation- from- Ambassador-of Finland- to:the United States, -Mrs. Koukku - Ronde, -and-Consul-General, Mr. _ Pietikain"en, to a Reception on November 5th at 5:30 p.m. at the Microsoft Technology Center. Sincerely, The Embassy of Finland in Washington, D.C. on the occasion-of the visit of the (ForeWn - Affairs Committee of the Pai ament of Finland Am6assador of Finland &va Koukku -Xmde and ConsuCGeneraf.94KO T'ietikainen request the pleasure of your company qUvP NikQ.Yfaga[aG Lo rm in {i Business Attire at a deception on Wednesday, ��Vovem6er S, 2014 from 5:30'to 7: 30 pm 94icrosoft 2echnofogy Center 3 601 76th Street Nest Edina, MY55435 I on the occasion-of the visit of the (ForeWn - Affairs Committee of the Pai ament of Finland Am6assador of Finland &va Koukku -Xmde and ConsuCGeneraf.94KO T'ietikainen request the pleasure of your company qUvP NikQ.Yfaga[aG Lo rm in {i Business Attire at a deception on Wednesday, ��Vovem6er S, 2014 from 5:30'to 7: 30 pm 94icrosoft 2echnofogy Center 3 601 76th Street Nest Edina, MY55435 Heather Branigin From: survey- noreply @bounce.research.net on behalf of mayorcoleman @nlc.org via research.net < mem be r@ research. net> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 201411:42 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Reminder'. Help inform NLC'spolicy priorities The National League of Cities is currently conducting a brief survey that is aimed at helping us set our 2015 strategic advocacy and policy agenda. -- As a valued- member of NLC, we hope you'll accept- this - invitation -to- share- your-opinions. Your input is very important and will help ensure that we are focused on the priorities that are most important to cities. The survey will take less than - 10 minutes to complete and your responses will remain completely confidential. To participate, click on the link below: https: / /www.research.net /s.aspx ?sm =do 2f4b8cC8vR8seAgBmTl8w 3d 3d Please take the survey at your earliest convenience. It will remain open until 5:00 p.m. Eastern on Monday, November 3, 2014. Thank you for your assistance. It is through our collective efforts that we can proactively drive federal policy on behalf of cities on issues that directly impact us all. Sincerely, Chris Coleman Mayor, Saint Paul, Minnesota President, National League of Cities Please note: If you do not wish to receive further, research emails from us, please click the link below, and you will be automatically removed from, our list. https://www.research.net/optout.asOx?sm=do 2f4b8cC8vR8seAgBmTl8w 3d 3d 1 Heather Branigin From: Walter Klus <wklus @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12 :31 PM To: Edina Mail; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmailcom Subject: 70.11 Valley View-Road, Edina 55439 Attachments: To Edina City Council 10- 29- 14.doc Please see attachment about my concern. Thank you. Carolyn Klus 7017 Valley View Road Edina, MN 55439 wklus a.aol.com 952 - 941 -5195 1 October 29, 2014 To: Edina City Council From: Carolyn Klus 7017 Valley View Road Edina, MN 55439 I live next door to a fast deteriorating property that has been abandoned - for- over two years. This- house (7011 Valley not visible from Valley View Road and for this reason I feel it is easily forgotten by the city. I feel it is a Health Hazard because of the following reasons: 1. House is full of mildew. The Property Manager told me he has to wear a mask when he enters the house. 2. The house is full of abandon junk from the yard and personal possessions. 3. Large screens are falling off the house. 4. Drive -way is completely'gone with deep holes. 5. Sidewalk up to the front door is completely. gone. 6. Garage door is broken and does. not close correctly. 7. Second floor deck is slowing deteriorating. I feel this is definitely a tear down house. I have a legal easement at the beginning of the driveway to my property in order to access my property. Because of the very poor condition of the driveway it is increasingly more difficult to access my property. I would like the city to take some action on this property. I am a widow, living alone and I am very concerned. Thank you. Carolyn Klus 952- 941 -5195 wklus@aol.com Heather Branigin From Paul and Deb Hanson <paulanddeb @me.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed sidewalk on Maddox Lane Attachments: Attention City Council Members.docx; ATT00001.txt My name is Paul Hanson. My wife Deb and I are long time residents of Maddox Lane. You recently received a letter from DeAnne Dubbs regarding the proposal by the Edina Planning Commission to put a.sidewalk on.Maddox Lane. In her letter she states her opposition to the plan as well as the opposition of the rest of the neighborhood. There is nothing more that I can add to her letter other than to state that we are in complete agreement with her in opposition to this plan. Both DeAnne and I attended the first planning meeting by the Planning Commission on September 29th and have been working with her in educating the other residents of Maddox Lane on this plan.as well as generating a petition by them that will be presented to you at the November 3rd City Council meeting. I have submitted the petition to the City Clerk as well as a cover. letter that explains why we are in opposition. I am attaching that cover letter to this email so you will have some time to "review it. , 1 Attention City Council Members Attached, please find the recent petition regarding the neighborhood's objection to the proposed sidewalk on Maddox Lane being submitted for approval by the Edina Planning Commission for the November 3 *a City Council meeting. Of the 17 households on Maddox Lane, 9.4% (16 of 17 households) are --opposed to this plan_In brief, the following reasons are why We oppose I t. 1. Maddox,tane is only two blocks long. Currently, there is Ino-other sidewalk to which it would connect.. The plan for a sidewalk for Valley View Road has been removed from .the plan because (we are told) that the residents opposed it. 2. The sidewalk would not create any logical connection between destinations. We are located in a commuter neighborhood with the only way to get to required destinations e.g. grocery stores, gas stations, restaurants or schools is by driving. 3. We believe that the average daily traffic (vehicles) and the 85th% speed (mph) cited in the Criteria Matrix of the plan does not reflect Maddox Lane but because it was bundled with Valley View Road and Normandale Road, the statistics'are significantly exaggerated for our two block street. There are natural barriers that reduce speed on Maddox Lane which makes it difficult to go 38mph as stated in the matrix. Also, there was no traffic measuring devices installed on Maddox Lane during this study. 4. Maddox Lane is not a street used by pedestrians to any extent as no matter what block of Maddox Lane you live on, if you choose to go for a walk, it is only a half of a short block to reach a side street that carries less traffic and connect to multiple streets one can walk that are less traveled. 5. -Most of the front yards on Maddox Lane are relatively shallow. A sidewalk that would consume 10 feet of space would have an adverse affect on the character and aesthetics of the neighborhood. 6. There is no history of a single crash or incident on Maddox Lane that has involved a pedestrian. Heather Braniain From: Johnson, Aya <Aya.Johnson @mail.house.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:06 PM Subject: FW: USCIS St. Paul Field Office Lease Procurement Attachments: USCIS,St. Paul Field Office letter Oct. 29, 2014.pdf Hello Everyone: As part of their outreach efforts, GSA sent out this letter today about the USCIS St. Paul Field Office, relocation. Contact information for GSA is below and in the attached letter. Warm regards, Aya Johnson Community Representative Office of Congressman Keith Ellison (MN -05) 2100 Plymouth Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55411 Officer (612),522-4212 E- mail: ava.lohnson @mail.house.gov Website: www.ellison.h6use.sov y. From:,.Barisa Meckler - 5A rmailto:barisa.meckler @gsa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:10 PM Subject: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services St. Paul Field Office Lease Procurement I am writing 4o provide an update as discussed in our previous meeting. We have now met with several stakeholders and .consulted with both St. Paul and Minneapolis officials. Please see the attached letter regarding the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services St. Paul field office lease procurement. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you very much. Barisa Meckler Special Assistant to the Regional Administrator U.S. General Services Administration Region-5 (312) 353 -0720 1 U.S. General Services Administration VIA EMAIL October 29, 2014 RE: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services St. Paul Field Office Lease Procurement Thank you for your continued interest in the lease procurement for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) St. Paul field. office. This letter is, intended to provide an update on the delineated area and other requirements for this procurement. As with each procurement, GSA has requirements and goals that must'be met. For this lease action, we have identified five main goals: provide high quality office space to allow USCIS to meet its mission within two years; comply with all Executive Orders, laws and regulations relating to government lease procurements; ensure the new office meets the transportation needs of USCIS employees and visitors; listen to any concerns from stakeholders prior to ,issuing the advertisement for space; and deliver best value by maximizing competition. In accordance with Executive Order 12072, GSA consulted with 'both the city of Minneapolis and the city of Saint Paul regarding this lease procurement.; Both cities provided the boundaries of their central business district (CBD) as shown on the maps enclosed with this letter. GSA's .market research indicated there are numerous buildings within both the CBD of Saint Paul and the CBD of Minneapolis that can potentially meet USCIS's requirements, and it was determined that, at this time, there is not a need to expand the delineated area. The lease advertisement will seek approximately 33,452 — 36,797 ANSI /SOMA Office Area square feet of office space. The lease requirements state that public . transportation options with regular service must be located within % mile of a train or light rail station or % mile of a bus stop from the office. Additionally, the requirements include six reserved on -site parking spaces for official government - owned vehicles and 193 paid, public parking spaces for employees and visitors must be available on -site or within % mile walking distance Region: Great Lakes U.S. General Sewices Administration 2:10 S. Dearborn Streel Ghirago, II. 60G04-0000, USA w1m.9sa.gov Minneapolis Central Business District Z Z W 0 B 8TIr W It 4 7TH 0 0 tL I CX Z -W > - 7T LL Ln (r 0 W < z z 0 3 - - cy _H z 5T 70 4 z lit L M 0 0 PL f0l�."UT14.1! T 7- 2T Wo. OAN ,A /y W 8TH 0 'k 6TH 5TH ZI < 4�141 0 "UP 2ND GLENW CURR 4 up Wo H�ESTN 2N y 2ND L Arp jot) 4TH K(NWOOD qS G WT _12�NLD,,,� :i, (S 14TH j L mi W :14'H I 15TI 0j 15 Jac I , D 6T� i Ir rH 2, 16TH,' IWH IPA LU, 7TH 3: TT�. V H -.jN, 1 DCLjLjIF%,),- I Tj -- �-1 -1/ W- ';4+�pb . e. IT BUTLE11 8T Am z z '9TH1 0 ;z �119TH, W 0 . :! --- * 4 t -F I (n �0 W0 W LOU) L) i F Z, < 22N} ry -9 NJ :4R ca (D Minneap6lis City of Lakes Legend N Downtown Office Core W +1, CBD or Downtown S Created by CPED Long Range Planning June 2014 CIS Saint Paul•, MIS Central Business District Delineated Area Map -- �ruma .•a � �� - - tiler Ale SLE My t_tl. t IV $ S• s f ��. Y' s �tr dr �� . y � ti ,:f � c f •y, t� a ';• .tom s.4� cC �,• V�r 5a1 mom' a fi sf ivo atshell Ave �. :d"� ,c 1~ 76 =s' Rh Sr try• � ,jS- �. T% �, ly `,\ 3� :•!h Jt '4a, ] SS V_7 1 Jt W s2 . fi��c Gst, rczY Errcg; '" .., � g t •• ti,S� - Carr. E �• .. �� y,y i 9111 S'- 1TlGQQ `� A„ ?i• St Paul , •. � -, tnt< 4�� U' � A"P � ' E 77 a 'S• N Qk C L .ti r�t Lp S . . 3:5! r'0 'V rar_ dt i rCy L•7 1' � :tar• rtt ,aln,.,l ... V"Sqep ur Heather Branigin From: Fittipaldi, Lisa <lisa.fittipaldi @uhg.com> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:55 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Home demolition at 4505 Arden Ave. Importance: I High Dear Mayor Hovland, I was greatly disturbed to come home Monday and see that an historic home across the street from me was demolished. This home has come before the Preservation Board on several occasions and demotion was not approved at any time. As a neighbor across the street (kitty corner to the demolished home), I thought I would receive notice and a chance to be heard before the home was demolished. I feel that the processes and procedures in place were bypassed and I would like an explanation. The damage is irreparable. A 100 year old home no longer exists and that cannot be reversed. The neighborhood is changed forever. When this home first came up for demolition, I took my personal time to canvas the neighborhood and collect petition signatures to prevent demolition of this historic English Tudor. We gathered nearly 100 signatures against demotion'and in favor of preserving the neighborhood's historic appeal..The Preservation Board had an objective independent structural assessment done for the home and it was determined that the home was structurally'sound. It is imperative that these assessments are done by someone objective and not someone with a clear financial stake in the outcome. The Preservation Board voted NOT to destroy this home and further that the front fagade of the home not be materially changed. Scott Busyn of Great Neighborhood Homes came before the Board again last year with plan to materially change the front fagade of the home and those plans were approved. This alone is disturbing, but I was given notice of that hearing and the procedures in place were adhered to. So neighbors must live with those consequences. Imagine my surprise when I came home Monday and the home was destroyed. My understanding is that it was determined the foundation was not sound. The homes in this neighborhood were all built nearly 100 years ago. The foundation of that home is as sound as the foundation on all the homes in the surrounding streets. Faulty foundations can be repaired — that is called preservation. Moreover, it.is quite possible that a builder can damage a foundation themselves in the process of remodeling. The answer to a damaged foundation needn't be demotion. I am concerned in addition, about the objectiveness of some of the members of the City. It seems to me that Mr. Busyn has a great deal of influence and personal relationships that may be influencing decisions. When a decision of this magnitude is made, a process must be followed and neighbors should be given an opportunity to weigh in. As I said, the harm is irreparable. Once an historic home is destroyed, there is no going back. Imagine how Boston or Philadelphia or Washington D.C. would look if they tore down every home that was old and needed renovation. The entire point of a preservation board is to repair and preserve. Edina has charm that Woodbury; Chanhassen and Eden Prairie do not. Yesterday a component of that charm gave way. The consequences are irreversible. A mockery has been made of the Preservation Board. I would like an explanation as to why the_ neighbors were not informed `and also as to what independent objective review was in place to determine that the foundation could not be repaired. Thank you. Lisa This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity - - -to - which it is- addressed. If the reader of this -e -mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. 2 Heather Branigin From: Hancock Family <ktwj @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 11;29 AM To: Cindy Larson; Joyce Repya; CTeague @Edina.MN.gov Cc: Edina Mail; jmellom @lawyer.com Subject: 4505 Arden Avenue RENOVATION Attachments: Construction _Management_Plan.pdf The builder directly violated #5 on this'building document. See attached. No one was informed about the demolition of this house. No one! There was NEVER a sign out front saying Demolition. "RENOVATION" was what was advertised on the builder's sign ( "false advertising ".) When the 4505 house was totally removed on Monday October 27 and there was a big hole in the ground by Tuesday October 28, the "RENOVATION" sign went down and a "SOLD" sign was put up. Shocking. Does this mean that the construction plans for the new house will change as well? Will it be larger? Wider? Will it stay within the Historical Preservation Rules and guidelines of the pre- existing Historically registered house that is now totally taken down to the ground..? Thank you for your answers... These complaints are not directed at the owners /and current neighbors ,of the tear down. Carol Hancock 4503 Arden Avenue 1 The construction on this site will follow normal industry and City accepted construction methods for a project of this type. Specific items of concern will be addressed as noted below. Any references to start date or duration of specific items are estimated and included only for reference. Construction management plans can also be found at: www.EdinaMN.gov The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they are responsible for complying with the below conditions. Signature of Contractor Site Contractor: Address: Phone: Email Address: The estimated construction start date is The estimated completion date is Date Sec. 10 -1 10. Permit Requirements. Unless otherwise specifically provided the following are required for both demolition permits and building permits. Demolition and Building Permit are defined as follows: Demolition: The removal or destruction of more than fifty percent (50 %) of the area of the exterior walls of a single or two family dwelling unit. Building Permit: A permit to construct a new single or two family dwelling unit. (1) The applicant must furnish the City with a certificate of insurance evidencing the following required coverage: Commercial general liability, including XCU coverage: Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non - owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protect on and off -site vegetation. Permit holder must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities may result in sediment laden storm water runoff entering the inlet The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must bean integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or.obstructions. Sec. 10 -1 1 I. .Permit Standards for Both Demolition Permits and Building Permits. (a) The permit holder must comply with the State Building Code, State Statutes and the City Code, including articles III,VI, VII and XVII of this Chapter. (b) Deliveries, of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday :Work is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. (c) The permit holder must repair any damage to public property, streets, and sidewalks. If damage occurs to the foregoing, it must be repaired within three (3) working days after the damage occurs, unless the permit holder has received written permission from the Building Official to delay repairs to a later specified date. (d) The permit holder must maintain a five -foot (5') parking setback from driveways and a thirty-foot (30') parking setback from intersections. When parking on a street, a vehicle must be completely located on the street surface, parallel to and within twelve (1'2) inches of the curb. Vehicles in violation of these requirements may be towed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 168B.035. On street parking of equipment other than licensed motor vehicles is prohibited. Stopping, standing or "parking a vehicle is prohibited, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: On a boulevard between the sidewalk and roadway; 2. Within five (5) feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway; 3. Where the vehicle will block a fire escape or the exit from any building; 4. Where temporary signs prohibit parking. Parking is allowed on local streets if a twelve -foot (12') wide area is open for the traveled portion of the road. On collector and arterial roadways, a minimum of twenty -two feet (22') must be open for the traveled portion of the road. Off - street and off -site parking for on site workers is required to the extent practicable. Police officers, community service officers, parking monitors and the Residential Redevelopment Coordinator of the City shall be responsible for enforcing the parking requirements and parking regulations of this Section. 3 Heather Branigin From: ART <a2t2 @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday,- October 30, 201412:25. PM To: jhovland @krausehovland.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast);jonibennettl2@comcalst.net Cc: Wayne Lindholm; rasmussen dal_el5;.a2t2 @icloud.com; Edina Mail; joshsprague7 @gmail.com; Michael Atkinson; Lisa Burroughs; Steph And Mike; ceidens @beaconhilistaffing.com; doug lewis; John A. Palmer; jrasmussen @davisrealestatemn.com; Kimberli Roberts; Leslie Nordgren; John A. Palmer Subject: Birchcrest B Neighborhood Edina City Council, A message was recently posted at the Birchcrest Neighborhood Nextdoor.com website by an ETC member alerting the Birchcrest Neighborhood of a Edina Public Hearing scheduled for November 3, 2014 to review a sidewalk amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. It was also implied in the posting that if the sidewalk amendment, or any part of the sidewalk amendment, were to;be approved on November 3, that the sidewalk amendments could be retroactively applied to 2014 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects that were approved by the City Council" at the December 10, 2014 Public, Hearing. So why is that important, much to our surprise, the proposed sidewalk amendment includes plans fora sidewalk down Valley View Road in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood. We thought the final decision on a Valley View Road.sidewalk in the Birchcrest Neighborhood was decided by the City Council on December 10,2013.1 t is difficult to understand how this could have ever been._ considered as -part of the sidewalk amendment when on December 10, 2013, as part of the 2014 Roadway Reconstruction Projects Public Hearing, and after much debate, the Edina City Council voted unanimously to remove the proposed Valley View Road sidewalk from the 2014 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project. • We were told that the purpose of the Roadway Reconstruction Public Hearing in December of 2013- (including the final design) was to take public comment and ultimately finalize and approve all of-the.' proposed 2014 Roadway Reconstruction projects. The 2014 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project was approved by the Edina City Council as a 2014 Roadway Reconstruction Project and did not include a Valley View Road Sidewalk in its final design or as it was approved by the City Council on December 10, 2013. In April of 2014, the Engineering department sent a letter to all Birchcrest B Neighborhood residents asking for feedback on a decision to remove the damaged concrete street sections in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood and to replace them with asphalt streets. Not what the letter was really asking for I sent Chad Millner with a few tweaks that the Birchcrest B neighborhood had come up with for the City Council approved sidewalk down Normandale Road between Benton Ave. and Clover Ridge. This is his reply: From: "Chad Millner" <cmillner @EdinaMN.gov> To: "Thelemann, Annabelle" <a2t2@com cast. net> Cc: "Wayne Lindholm" <wlindholm @gmail.com >, "rasmussen dale15" <rasmussen.dale15 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:42:24 AM Subject: RE: Birchcrest B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Thanks for vour comments. as dedided b_y he= otancil a tie Dec'l0 Pu ic° mproyelnen# 0#ftjAt that same meeting, council asked staff to get alternate bids for the concrete streets. The findings of those alternate bids was the purpose of the letter you received. I'm sorry for the confusion related to,the letter and if you have any other comments, please forward those on. Thanks again for your continued interest in the project, Chad • Based on Chad Millner's email, we all felt that the Valley View Road Sidewalk conversation was over and that the December 10, 2013 decision made by the Edina City Council in regard to the Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project was final. • One of the questions raised during the Birchcrest B Neighborhood presentation to the City Council in December was, "How did a Valley View Road sidewalk get added to the Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project without an amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan since the current Comprehensive Plan does not have a rrecommendation for a sidewalk down Valley View Road in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood ?" • When the completed 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan was approved by the Met Council in August of 2009, it did not contain any roadway related or pedestrian related sidewalks or trails in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood. In fact, the only proposed roadway modification noted called for a secondary bike route down Valley View Road in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood. 2 The list people who contributed to the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan is very impressive and it includes three current City Council Members. With respect to a sidewalk down Valley View Road in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood, what does the team who authored the upcoming sidewalk amendment know that the authors of the 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan didn't know? In a recent letter to the Edina Sun Current newspaper an Edina resident asked, something to the effect of, why does the City of Edina spend all this time and money on planning activities when they turn right around and amend the plans. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan, with respect to a Valley View Road sidewalk, got it right. The integrity of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan should be protected and remain intact and not modified by the proposed sidewalk amendment. The 2014 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project should not be allowed to be retroactively modified by the upcoming sidewalk amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. If the integrity of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan is to remain intact, a Valley View Road Sidewalk in the Birchcrest B Neighborhood should not be up for consideration at this time. The Edina City Council has already voted not to build a sidewalk down Valley View Road as part of the 2014 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Plan and that's the decision that should stand. • Remove the proposed Valley View Road sidewalk from sidewalk amendment of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Plan; that decision has already been made by the City Council as part of the December 10, 2013 Public Hearing and is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. If during the December Public Hearings for the upcoming year's Roadway Reconstruction Projects, a project has components removed from the roadway improvement proposal, don't allow those (removed) items to reconsidered until that particular Roadway Reconstruction Project is up again for review in say 15 -20 years, or until it's time to do the mandated 10 year update of the comprehensive plan; whichever date comes first o Example: The sidewalk amendment sidewalk down Valley View Road could not be added back, retroactively, into the already approved 2014 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Plan regardless of when the project is actually constructed because this particular project was 3 already approved without the Valley View Road sidewalk last December and should take presidents over the sidewalk amendment 'However it could be proposed as part of the mandated update of the Comprehensive Plan in 2018 or if the City Council want's it added later, say at the December 2033( ?) Public Hearing of the 2,034 Birchcrest.B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project. If parts of the sidewalk amendment get approved, they could be applied to all. future Roadway Reconstruction projects that are scheduled for 2015. This would not include the Birchcrest B Neighborhood.Reconstruction Project since it was approved as a 2014 plan and would not be subject to retroactive amendment- changes. As a City Council Member, all we ask that you 1). do not go back on your word with respect to what you already approved in the 2014 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Reconstruction Project, 2); protect the integrity of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; let's plan the. work an,d work the plan. Let's not plan the work and continuously amend the plan(s). We believe that this would make the Roadway Reconstruction Projects Process a little easier to deal with and easier to keep track of.. For you see, you'live in this world on a daily /weekly /monthly basis, the vast majority of Edina residents do not. It can be extremely difficult to successfully navigate through this process.. Thank-you for your consideration, Art Thelemann, Wayne Lindholm, and Dale Rasmussen 4 email to: mail @edinamn.gov City of Edina Attn: Deb Mangen, City Clerk Heather Branigin, Executive Assistant. Edina Minnesota - - -- - Re: September 16th, 2014 Council Meeting Dear Heather, My wife and I read the attached correspondence at the September 16th City Council meeting. Prior to us speaking, Lori gave copies of the attached to Deb for the public record. When we spoke we each asked to have this be entered into the public record and the Mayor said this would be done. We have yet to see this in the public correspondence. Please enter this into the public correspondence for the November 3rd Council Meeting. Thank you for your assistance with this request. Regards, Lori and Jim Grotz 5513 Park Place Edina Minnesota 55424 0 Mayor Hovland; Councllmembers: Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Ann Swenson, Josh Sprague; Mgr. Neal, Chad Milner, Ross Bintner, Dave Fisher 5509 Park Place, to the north, will be torn down and a spec home will be built. Our property sits several feet below 5509, but we are not impacted by drainage from them as they have a drainage system In their rear yard that takes the storm water to Park Place. City'Engineering staff has visited the site on June 30, 2014 and August 29, 2014. This system has: • A catch basin measuring 30 inches at the SE corner of the house. • The drain tile runs along the south side of the house behind a block retaining wall. The catch basin and drain the collect and divert storm water directly to Park Place. The City of Edina (Ken Rosland) required the catch basin and drain tile to be installed in 1997 to take the water to Park Place. The house was sold in 2007. in order to control the volume of water in the rear yard, the new owner found it necessary to bury and tile: • Three roof drains 3" X 4" in the rear yard to the catch basin. • Sump pump drain #1 on the SE to the catch basin. • Sump pump #2 on the SW to Park Place • Two north roof drains to Park Place. The survey of existing site conditions does not show this drainage system nor does the proposed storm water management plan. Engineering staff wrote in his August 5, 2014 Review of 5509 Park Place that: • "This drainage path (from 5509 Park Place)is through private property to the south(5513 Park Place) and then to Park.Place or Dever Drive." This is NOT true. Staff has seen'the site. The water at 5509 Park-Place goes to Park Place and NOT into our yard. Please correct this. Staff emalled the Builder a copy of this Engineering review and in doing has essentially told the \Builder - that he can drain his water into our yard. Staff has granted an illegal drainage easement on our property for the benefit of the Builder with no notification or compensation to us. The proposed drainage plan will not contain and divert the.water to Park Place as It currently does and as was previously mandated by the City but will direct water onto. our property without our permission. We do not have a sump pump and drain tile. We cannot manage this volume of water. The new home needs to keep the catch basin and drain tile, gutters and buried roof and sump drains. r � i Staff has told us we will not get more water than we are currently getting. We don't get water now. Please keep a hold on the demo permit until: • The illegal drainage easement is removed. • The. proposed drainage plan shows Water going to Park Place and not into our. yard. • All permit requirements have been satisfied, including accurate & complete surveys And I would ask you to please enter this into the public record, thank you, Lori &Jim -Grotz 5513 Park Place September 16, 2014 . SE'., :House Corner 30Yinch,Catch *a irn � r Ov Pla Gov s'the' VAt Thaw v ;Ump Pump' liled Drain WIj r SE Corner Tiled Roof Drain - #1 Sump Pump - (previously burrec SP c.:lr ,f:Y :tee �-A_•raes, ,.r,._ r ,_ S side of'house'shows retaining'wall with 4 in h lip to hold back water, ,View o ark from 55.13 . k P, I . ti.•4 i ! � �(t �. 7g }L •a . �Y�i9, - ".yam, � ♦ �� i may( _ •Y � � •1 �� t ' e g'�� tit" �l "• .x _i x< i;�� . •t�'Id�`_�,:di. �4.Se�. tt'L�°�'e��i ;�+ DATE: August 5, 2014 TO: -David Fisher — Building Official CC: Chad Milner — City Engineer Permit Applicant FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE. :9509 PrlcPlqce' Permit 133045' The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and adherence to: • Chapter 10, Article 4 — Demolition. Permit Stormwater,and Erosion Control (10: -106 to .10 -1.13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering in the Course of Construction Work. (10 -341: to 10 -345) Chapter 10 Article 17 Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10-71.0) Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2 — Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 -- .Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) 1. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creels Watershed District: www,minnehahacreek.oi 2. Site survey should follow the standard described in policy SP -005 -B Included in the building permit application packet. Survey missing the following: a. #10.4 Lowest point of entry of proposed and existing (show proposed egress window wells) b. #11 -12 ESC and drainage can be shown on grading,stormwater management, or erosion control plan. 3. City Standard Plates available here: http : / /edinainn,goy /index.RhR ?section = construction standards Street and Curb Cut 4. Application. proposes relocation or modification of curb cut,. Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http: / /edinamn.gov /edinafiles /files /City Officesftblic Works /CurbCutAppllcation.pdf 5. Describe removal and restoration of existing driveway and curb cut. The area. Is within the 5 year moratorium. Sanitary and Water Utilities 6. Show utility connections. See figure below. Storm Water Utility 7. The subject site front yard drains to Park Place and is part of subwatershed MHS 11. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited 8 The; subJect_site rear and side yal d also drains to subwatei shed MHS I 1 Thls drainage path is Ht.ough private property to'the south' :and'then to Park'Place'oi'. Deveh Drive '" 9. A 4" service connection (elate 241.310) to a 6" sump drain Is available on park place at the northwest corner of the lot. Connections can be made along the line if needed. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevaid . Fdlna, Minnesota 55439 w%v%EdlnaMN,gov # 952-826-03711 Pax 952.826.0392 Mayor and members of the City Council. I have asked my documents for 5508 Dever Drive be handed to you before the start of the meeting and entered into the public record. My presentation follows the previous one on 5509 Park Place with similar issues and concerns of granting an illegal drainage easement by City Engineering staff. This home at 5508 Dever to our East will be torn down and this home sits many feet above ours. At the time of the original land division and development, retaining walls were installed to remove the need for a steep bank between the properties. In, addition the previous owners installed elaborate retaining planters and water direction systems which either held the water or diverted it to the South to Dever Drive. All roof drains on 5508 Dever are buried and tiled. The homeowner plans to cut down his rear yard by 5 feet and has told us all retaining walls, retaining planters and retaining structures will be removed. At the present time storm water from 5508 does not cross into our property except at the farthest SouthWest corner of 5508 near the telephone pole. Along the entire Western property line, we need a durable retaining wall with a French drain immediately to the East to prevent drainage into our yard and to direct the water South to Dever Drive. We also need gutters with all roof drains on the North and West tiled to Dever Drive. I am also concerned about City Engineering Drainage memos making statements to benefit builders that are simply not true. In the Engineering Review of 5508 Dever Drive which states "This drainage path is through private property to the west and then to Dever Drive ". By making this statement, staff may create a civil issue between the City of Edina and us with this language in the memo. We have been told by counsel this appears to be an illegal backdoor eminent domain taking of our property rights. This takes our property rights and gives them to the builder. We were not notified, we were not compensated, if not corrected; an illegal taking of our property rights occurs. We again request the City Engineering Memos be corrected and sent to all parties. Thank You. Jim and Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, Edina, MN 55424 Dated Sept. 16, 2014 sir 1 1 i ..,`' - 5508 1 � + � i f.es+ar�ta 4 i,IaS�ttb to be r RI, 5508 'Back arch inage retained by ; Y .timber retaining ally 1 + - ' Zi N� 3F.`•'i AFf�l��t# moved gu».�i31��� 1 C, f r View of Sido Yard frori7 55T:3. Park PI. a r DATE: June 13, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Chad Milner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner KE, - Environmental Engineer RE: 5508 Dever Drive 'Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control for general adherence to the following ordinance sections: • Chapter 10, Article 4 _ Demolition Permit Stormwater and Erosion Control (10 -106 to 10- 1 13) • Chapter 10, Article 7 — Littering In the Course of Construction Work (10 -341 to 10 -345) • Chapter 10 Article 17 — Land Disturbing Activities (10 -674 to 10 -710) • Chapter 24, Article 4 Division 2.— Roadway Access (24 -129 to 24 -133) • Chapter 36, Article 12 — Drainage, Retaining Walls and Site Access (36 -1257) This review was performed at. the request of the Planning Department and assumes the attached documents were submitted for building permit review. A more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. I. A separate permit may bel required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: )mmminnehahacreek:orgl 2. Site surveyshould follow the standard described In policy SP -005 -B included in the building permit application packet. Street and Curb Cut 3. It appears application may utilize existing drive entrance. If application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut; Follow standards In curb cut permit application: http:l /edinamn.gov /edinafiies/ Iles /City Offices/ Public Works /CurbCutAppllcation.pdt Sanitaiy and Water Utilities 4. Show utility connections, Storm Water Utility 5. The subject site front yard. drains to Dever Drive and is part of subwatershed MHS —I 1. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited, 6. The subject site rear and Side yard also drains to subwatershed MHS_I I. This :di=ainage`p -th Is fhrough private property to the west and ;then t'o:Dever Drive, 7. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following linksi hctps: / /maps.barr.com /edina and htc : / /ed inamn.gov/ index .phWsection= engineering_water resource 8. Required storm water and erosion control precautions are described below. EN41NEEMNG DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota, 55439' wwwBdlnaMN:gov • 952 - 826 =0371 • Pax 952.826 -0392 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 3, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. 0� e �s ch 0 Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Z Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 Heather Braniain From: Sue Soule <sulb3so @comcast:net> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:35 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Sidewalk Facilities Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: In regard to the Living Streets Sidewalk Plan, I oppose the change in designation of West Shore Drive from local street to local connector and the consequent requirement of at least one sidewalk on our street. We have lived on West Shore for 26 years. During that time, we have seen abundant recreational use of our street — walking, biking, roller- blading, scooters, etc., - by people of all ages. It is already a "living street ". What we have not seen, or heard reported, is any instance of a car /pedestrian or car /bike accident anywhere between 701h Street and Hibiscus. If our side of the street were to be selected for a sidewalk, the minimum 5 foot boulevard and minimum 5 foot sidewalk would require the loss the two beautiful hardwood maples trees and two evergreens, all over thirtv years old. We would also have to move our irrigation system. All of these features were part of what we paid for when purchasing our home, part of the value of our property. ,h "Living streets" should not equate.with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to the value of the property and the streetscape. If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of beauty and home value. If traffic speed is.a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all we see is a solution without a problem. Sincerely, Sue and Gary Soule 7324 West Shore Drive 1 Heather Branigin From: Hayward, Edward I <EHayw.ard @oppenheimer.com> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 2:33 PM To: Edina Mail cc':. Ellie Hayward (ehayward43 @msn.com) Subject:. West Shore Drive I only just learned of the renewed proposal to provide for a sidewalk on West Shore Drive. I will be out of town November 3 (I .voted early), but please take note of my opposition to the proposal, which I expressed at a Council meeting several years ago. Our front.yard (6n the East side of the street) would simply not accommodate a sidewalk and boulevard, and I do not see the necessity of a sidewalk. Sincerely, Ed Hayward 6625 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Tel 952 929 -0393 (Ii) OPPENHEIME:R OPPENHEIMER WOLFF k DONNELLY LIP Edward J. Hayward Attorney at Law Campbell Mithun Tower — Suite 2000 , 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3338 T 612.607.7280 F 612.607.7100 C 952.484.6625 EHayward @oppenheimer.com I vCard This message contains conGdenfial information intended only for the use of the addressees) named above and may contain Information that is legally privileged. If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and delete the original messago immediately thereafter. Thank you. 1 Heather Branigin From: Wally Norlander <wnorlander @gmail;com> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 7:26 P.M To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Please do not approve the compreliensive sidewalk plan. It was advanced without any input from homeowners. We who live on Maddox Lane do not want sidewalks. -- -Wally & Bonnie Norlander 5317 Maddox Lane 1 Heather Branigin From: wnorlander @gmail.com Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 7:41 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: wally norlander Organization: _W_ebsite:_wnorlander@gmail.com _ Address 1: 5317 maddox lane Address 2: City: edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55436 Email: wnorlandernaogmail.com Phone: 952-926-9109 Referrer: other Message: We have recently learned that a. comprehensive sidewalk construction plan has been advanced without input from affected property owners. Please be advised that a majority of homeowners on Maddox Lane are very much against sidewalks on our two -block street. Our front lawns are shallow and the 10 -foot intrusion could mean taking nearly a third of our lawns. Please exclude Maddox Lane from the comprehensive sidewalk construction plan. 1 - Heather Branigin From: Jane Lonnquist <jjlonnquist @earthlink.net> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 9 :45. AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Letter to the Mayor and City Council on 4505 Arden Tear -Down Dear Mayor and City Council, As a Country Club resident who worked closely with City staff, officials and neighbors to revise the Historic District's 2002 reconstruction rules into the current 2008 Plan of Treatment, I am very concerned about the process by which total demolition of 4505 Arden was approved. Of course city'officials have the right and responsibility to condem unsafe buildings. But why did city staff decide to waive the 20 -day notification period to the adjacent neighbors when they approved demolition of the historic facade? Neighbors had been told that the rear addition would be demolished and the historic facade would be rennovated. Why wasn't the Heritage Preservation Board informed of this change of plans as well? The haste and the silence are at odds with the clear and transparent process we worked hard to create. During the four -year quest by the builder to have this home demolished, City staff and the Heritage Preservation Board used the 2008 rules to guide procedures and decisions. Then suddenly, the process went "off script" without input from the HPB or the adjacent neighbors.'This sets a bad precedent for future adherence to the guidelines. It also leaves many residents feeling distrustful, once again, of,the City's alliance with developers who seek profit, rather than residents who seek the preservation of this city asset. Thank you for reviewing the case of 4505 Arden. It sets an important precedent for our neighborhood. Sincerely, Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Avenue h: 952- 926 -3725 1 Heather Branigin From: Jane Lonnquist <jjlonnquist @earthlink.net> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 8:26 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: (Revised) Letter to the Mayor and City Council on 4505 Arden Tear -Down I apologize for two spelling errors in my earlier letter and hope you consider this version: Dear Mayor and City Council members, As a Country Club resident who worked closely with City staff, officials and neighbors to revise the Historic District's 2002 reconstruction rules into the current 2008 Plan of Treatment, I am very concerned about the process by which total demolition of 4505 Arden was approved. Of.course city officials have the rightand responsibility to condemn unsafe buildings. But why did city staff decide to waive the 20 -day notification period to the adjacent neighbors when they approved demolition of the historic facade? Neighbors had been told that the rear addition would be demolished and the historic facade would be renovated. Why wasn't the Heritage Preservation Board informed of this change of plans as well? The haste and the silence are at odds with the clear and transparent process we worked hard to create. During the four -year quest by the builder to have this home demolished, City staff and the Heritage Preservation Board used the 2008 rules to guide procedures and decisions. Then suddenly, the process went "off script" without input from the HPB or the adjacent neighbors. This sets a bad precedent for future adherence to the guidelines. It also leaves many residents feeling distrustful, once again, of the City's alliance with developers who seek profit, rather than residents who seek the preservation of this city asset. Thank you for reviewing the case of 4505 Arden. It sets an important precedent for our neighborhood. Sincerely, Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Avenue h: 952 - 926 -3725 - - - -- Forwarded Message ----- >From: Jane Lonnquist <iilonnguist@earthlink.net> >Sent: Nov 2, 2014 9:45 AM >To: mail @EdinaMN.gov > Subject: Letter to the Mayor and City Council on 4505 Arden Tear -Down >Dear Mayor and City Council, >As a Country Club resident who worked closely with City staff, officials and neighbors to revise the Historic District's 2002 reconstruction rules into the current 2008 Plan of Treatment, I am very concerned about the process by which total demolition of 4505 Arden was approved. Of course city officials have the right and responsibility to condem unsafe buildings. But why did city staff decide to waive the 20- day-notification period to the adjacent neighbors when they approved demolition of the historic facade? Neighbors had been told that the rear addition would be demolished and the historic facade would be rennovated. Why wasn't the Heritage Preservation Board informed of this change of plans as well? The haste and the silence are at odds with the clear and transparent process we worked hard to create. >During the four -year quest by the builder to have this home demolished, City staff and the Heritage Preservation Board used the 2008 rules to guide procedures and decisions. Then suddenly, the process went "off script" without input from the HPB or the adjacent neighbors. This sets a bad precedent for future adherence to the guidelines. It also leaves many residents feeling distrustful, once again, ofihe City's alliance With developers who seek profit, rather than residents who seek the preservation of. this city asset: >Thank you for reviewing the case of 4505 Arden. It sets an important precedent for our neighborhood. > >Sincerely, >Jane Lonnquist >4510 Drexel Avenue >h: 952 - 926 -3725 2 Heather Branigin From: JEFFREY S LAUKKONEN= <jjlaukk2 @msn.com> Sent: Sunday, November,02, 2014 11:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Maddox Lane Sidewalk Plan Attachments: Sidewalk Plan.docx' 1 November 2, 2014 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, As an Edina homeowner along a proposed sidewalk route, I am concerned about the rational and methodology for choosing Maddox Lane. • How many pedestrians or bicyclists have been hit and /or injured? • How were the average daily traffic (vehicles) count and speeds gathered? (There have been no counters or speed signs on Maddox Lane) • Who will be responsible for driveway re- grading upon sidewalk installation? • Who will be responsible for removal of any trees and landscaping? • Have the cost of moving stop signs, fire hydrants and light poles been considered? • Who will be responsible for snow removal when the plows have cleared the streets? Not everyone in Edina has a snow - blower or plowing service. • Although a homeowner won't be individually assessed — what percentage increase will we see in our taxes? Maddox Lane has natural speed barriers. There are two sharp curves coming into it from the east, a cross street in the middle and a T intersection at the west end. Vehicles generally don't even reach 30 mph. I live on the corner of Mildred and Maddox. Every winter I get the snow from Mildred coming around the corner and the snow from the sharp curve of Valley View all in my front yard. The snow -plow and /or grader usually have to come over the curb and into my -yard to push the piles of snow back for cars to see around the corner. Last winter I had snow at least 4 feet tall and 8 feet deep. How would I ever get the snow cleared off a sidewalk? I read the "Environmental Considerations: Sidewalks and bicycle facilities support non - motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions." Will it? It could. Realistically, it won't, no matter how much wishful thinking there is. I request that Maddox Lane be dropped from the sidewalk plan. Sincerely, Jan Laukkonen 5216 Maddox Lane Edina, MN 55436 jjlaukk2 @msn.com Heather, Braniain From: Marge Buechler <margebuechler @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 7:27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Local connector ... W Shore Drive What are you thinking or are you even thinking... On any given day, I maybe count 3 couples walking by my home on W Shore. For the most part, they're walking their dogs and will be done once the snow starts flying. For the last 35 years, there hasn't been a need, and I doubt it's suddenly going to develop into one. If it's a bike path you're looking for, that's even worse. I rarely see neighborhood kids on bikes. It's no longer safe to allow children to ride around town unescorted for fear of kidnapping. We have transients (sellers /poll takers) walking around on occasion, but I don't want to encourage strangers in our area, hence no need for a sidewalk. There is always our mailman, but rumors keep flying that we're going to lose house delivery soon and would have, street. mail boxes with drive by access. ' As a connector you would need to connect something. This sounds more like a bridge to no where than a connector. Do we not'have better projects to spend our tax dollars on? We're not a business area, nor are we a (high) pedestrian area. West shore drive is a hill, the possibility of falling on ice packed sidewalks is very real. Quite often, cars can hardly make it up the hill. Us long time residents call it the Dunham spin... I've personally", ersonally watched cars slide back down after an ice storm, and that's with a city crew that plows regularly. Are you trying to connect The Fred with Cornelia Park ? ?? That's pure stupidity and would endanger our neighborhood kids with additional outside the area traffic and strangers. It's bad enough being close to highway 100 without adding more unknowns. We're proud of our residential area and relative safety... Why destroy the sense of neighborhood that exists now. Thinking ahead... Marge Buechler 1 Heather Branigin From: Dennis Ferrikes 4ern7313 @scc.net> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 9:19 AM To: Edina Mail; Jon! Bennett; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Ann Swenson Subject: Dear Mayor and Council Members; Dear Mayor and Council Members, I reside on West Shore Drive, south of W 70th Street. I am writing to voice my opinion on the sidewalk proposed for this street. I have lived here for over 25 years and on multiple occasions, too many to count, I have watched walkers, both young and old, strolling or jogging along this street. I truly believe that they enjoy using the street to walk. Where I live, it is all concrete. The road is wide and does not have a lot of parked cars on it. Many of these people walk dogs that like to stop and sniff or meander around. Others are with their young children who are just learning to bike. Still others are family groups that like to be close together. I have never seen cars or trucks endangering these people. In fact, it causes them to slow down and pay more attention to.their driving. I honestly believe, that even with a sidewalk, they will choose to walk in the street. I have seen joggers on streets that do have sidewalks, but they still jog in the street in violation of the City Code. So please take note of my opposition to putting in sidewalks on this street. Thank you, Dennis Fernkes 7313 W Shore Dr - Sent from my iPad. Heather Branigin From: Cavanaugh, Stacey < Stacey .Cavanaugh @edinaschools.org> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 9:53 AM To: .Edina. Mail Subject: What will it take? Eden Ave Please table the agreement with Frauenshuh indefinitely and instead use existing information (approved plans, policies, public input, and other data) to generate public use scenarios for the former public works site: Stacey Cavanaugh - Edina Public Schools Creek Valley Elementary, Grade 5 952 - 848 -3259 Stacey. cavanaughCa edInaschools.orq CavKlds - https:// sltes. google. com/ a /apl2s.edina.kl2.mn,us /cavklds/ Heather Braniain From: Mark Gentry <markgentry@hotmail.com> Sent: "Monday, November 03, 201410:05 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grand view City Council - Please table the agreement with Frauenshuh indefinitely and instead use existing information (approved plans, policies, public input, and other data) to generate public use scenarios for the former public works site. The above request also reflects how I will be voting tomorrow for City Council. Please listen to the citizens of Edina who elected you. Mark Gentry 612.221.5118 1 Heather Branigin From: Nancy Bush <nancyjenkinsbush @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 10:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview development - It is extremely concerning to me that the City Council has been ignoring the wishes of the community regarding the development of the former public works site. Through petitions, surveys and voices heard at the very limited public forums, the residents of Edina have shared their wishes for a public use development and vehemently opposed development for commercial/housing use. Despite this, the city continues to move forward with a developer. What is it going to take to be heard? I'm disgusted with the way this situation has been handled and urge you to refrain from taking this any further with a developer. Let's use the information we have (plans, studies etc) as the basis for discussion for what will be the best use of this land. Nancy Bush 4418 Curve Ave Edina, MN 55424 Heather Braniain From: Gary Benke, MD <benke @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 1:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Hovland and City Council Maddox Lane Sidewalks To Mayor Hovland and the City Council, We were not asked for our input on the Maddox Lane sidewalk project. What ever happened to representation along with taxation? We do in fact pay city taxes, but were not advised of this project or our opinions sought. Snow removal will be a big concern of ours; We will see you at the meeting tonight. Carol Myslivecek Gary Benke 5225 Maddox Lane Edina,MN 55436 1 Heather Branigin From: Bruce Kieffer <bruce @kieffer.us> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 12:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Agreement wiih,Frauenshuh, Table it. As Edina citizens we are very concerned about the recent City Council trends basically ignoring all the prior public input for the redevelopment of Grandview. Please table the agreement with Frauenshuh indefinitely, and instead use existing information (approved plans, policies, public input, and other data) to generate public use scenarios for the former public works site. Marnee & Bruce Kieffer -- 5404 Edenmoor Street Edina, MN 55436 -2320 Bruce Kieffer bruceAkieffer.us http: / /kieffer.us 9 i Heather Braniain From: Virginia Kearney <vmkearney @msn.com> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 1:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Public Works Site To the City Council of Edina, I want to voice my concern about the development of the Public Works site. Please honor the citizens of Edina's (well documented) desire to leave public land for public use. I respectfully ask you to stop the agreement with Frauenshuh indefinitely and instead use existing information (approved plans, policies, public input, and other data) to generate public use scenarios for the former public works site. You all have the opportunity to do the right thing, and follow the clearly stated desire of the people of Edina. The last thing that this town needs is high density housing and office space. Wouldn't you be proud to say that you were part of a council that stopped senseless development and listened to the public instead? Virginia Kearney 4226 Grimes Ave. 1 To: City Council From: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Date: November 3, 2014 Subject: Human Rights and Relations Commissioner Resignation Action Requested: None. /k O ►> Agenda Item M IX. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Information / Background: Commissioner member Derek Carter resigned from the Edina HRRC on October 27, 2014. As discussed at a City Council work session, this unscheduled vacancy will remain open until 2015 Boards and Commissions annual onboarding. Attachment. Resignation Letter. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 I I From: 1. Seidman To: MJ Lannon; Lindy Crawford Cc: Patrice Arseneaul Subject: FW: HRRC Resignation Date: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:19:43 PM Please see email below from Derek Carter regarding his resignation from the HRRC. Jan From: Derek S. Carter rmailtooderekscottcarter(&amaii.com] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:38 AM --To:-Jan Seidman Subject: HRRC Resignation Jan... I am formally resigning from the HRRC. I started a new job in September and am focusing all of my energies on that along with my family (though, not enough I'm told). Other than the blog, I am not engaged in any other items. There shouldn't be too much:' disruption. apologize for not completing my commitment, but needed to prioritize. Let me know if you'd like to talk. Derek S. Carter http://about.me/TalentDiSCipLe 952-210-6525 Mobile teal' To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Item No. IX. C. From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Edina Transportation Commission Date: November 3, 2014 Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Bicycling in Municipal Parking Facilities Ordinance Attachments: I. Edina City Code Chapter 24, Article VII, Division 2, Sec. 24 -254 2. Edina City Code Chapter 24, Article VIII, Division 5, Sec. 24 -399 3. Bike Edina Recommendation from July 2014 Action Requested: City Council direct City staff to conduct a thorough legal review and modification of Chapter 24, Articles VII and VIII of Edina City Code. Situation: City code prohibits riding a bicycle in a municipal parking facility. This includes both surface parking lots and ramps. Bike Edina has recommended modifying the ordinance to permit bicycle use of municipal parking facilities. ETC has discussed the Bike Edina recommendation and encourages a broader modification to the ordinance that also takes into consideration other forms of non - motorized transportation, such as skateboards and scooters, which are currently not permitted in municipal parking facilities. Background: Sec. 24 -399 of Edina City Code reads: "No person shall use a skateboard, roller skates, in -line skates or blades, bicycles, scooters or similar devices on or within any municipal parking facility." Sec. 24 -395 (1) and (2) read: "The term 'municipal parking facility' means any lot or ramp, and the lanes giving ingress thereto and egress therefrom, and all accessories thereof, owned or operated by the City or the housing and redevelopment authority of the City, herein called 'HRA,' and made available to the public for parking of private motor vehicles whether for a fee or at no cost. The term 'municipal parking facility' does not include parking spaces located along public streets and highways." A violation of Sec. 24 -399 would be a misdemeanor (the default penalty in City code). In July 2014, Bike Edina members discussed the ordinance and how it prohibits bicycle access to City facilities, including parks and bicycle parking, unless a bicyclist rides on the sidewalk. Members understood the intent of the ordinance was most likely to prohibit recreational use of parking facilities 149t�1r Page 2 O G • ,'���ltl'UK ��tv • IHtlU (skateboard tricks, etc.), but believed the ordinance is written too broadly. A motion was approved to recommend modifying Sec. 24 -399 of City Code by striking the word "bicycles." The group agreed that, just as with the biking on sidewalks ordinance, safety education should go along with the ordinance change. The ETC discussed the Bike Edina recommendation in September. Discussion included: • Agreement that the current ordinance, if followed, would make it difficult for people riding bikes to legally access bike parking, especially at City parks. • Concern about the potential dangers of riding a bike, skateboard or scooter in a parking lot. • The need to acknowledge that skateboards and scooters are also forms of non - motorized transportation, especially for younger people. • The need to be forward thinking when revising the ordinance. In the future, the City may include bike parking, bike service areas, and bike /skateboard /scooter lockers in municipal parking ramps. • The need to revise the ordinance to permit access to parking and destinations but to prohibit recreational use of the parking facilities. Under current City code, skateboards, roller skates, in -line skates or blades, or similar devices may not be used in municipal parking facilities under both Section 24 -254 and Section 24 -399. Only Section 24- 399 applies to bicycles. Analysis: The City has worked to make Edina more bicycle friendly. Updating City ordinances is part of this effort. The current ordinance prohibiting using a bicycle in municipal parking facilities limits legal access to bike parking, especially at City parks. In the future, the ordinance could limit the development of bike parking and service areas in parking ramps. The City has also worked to improve transportation options for residents. For young people especially, bicycles, skateboards and scooters are forms of transportation. For safety reasons, recreational use of bicycles, skateboards, scooters and similar devices in municipal parking facilities should continue to be prohibited. Transportation use, for the purposes of parking or accessing a building or City park adjacent to, or in close proximity to, a municipal parking facility should be permitted unless otherwise posted. Recommendation: egg fir Page 3 IdU13 Review and modify Sections 24 -254 and 24 -399 to permit non - recreational use of municipal parking facilities by bicycles, skateboards, scooters, and similar devices, except where posted. Prepared by: Jennifer Janovy Reviewed by: Dawn Spanhake and Katherine Bass Date: September 30, 2014 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM\Advisory Communications\2014 \Item Ix. C. ETC Advisory Communication—Bicycling in Municipal Lots.docx Municode Page 1 of 3 Sec. 24 -254. Conduct in parks, streets, sidewalks, and publicly owned property. No person, in any park, street, sidewalk or publicly owned property shall: (1) Cut, break, scratch, mark or in any way injure or deface or remove any building, fence, post, pump, lamp, flagpole, construction work, improvement, facility or any other structure or property. (2) Post, paste, fasten, paint or affix any placard, bill, notice or sign upon any motor vehicle, structure, pole, tree, stone, fence, thing or enclosure, unless first authorized in writing by the city. (3) Pick or cut any wild or cultivated flower, or cut, break or in any way injure or deface any tree, shrub or plant, provided that a property owner may prune trees and shrubs on the street right -of -way adjoining his property subject to the permission of the park director. (4) Remove any wild flower, tree, shrub, plant, branch or portion thereof, or any soil or other material without the approval of the park director. . (5) Go on foot or otherwise upon grass or turf where a prohibitory sign is posted. (6) Throw or cast any stone or other object, or aim or discharge any air gun, sling shot or other weapon except according to the rules of a game or recreation permitted in writing by the city. (7) Deposit, place or leave any paper, rubbish, waste, cans, bottles or refuse of any kind except in receptacles provided for the collection of waste. (8) Deposit, place or leave in publicly owned waste receptacles refuse generated from normal household or business activities. (9) Start or maintain any fire except small fires made by picnic parties in those locations in parks designated for that purpose by the city. (10) Abandon any fire made pursuant to subsection (9) of this section without completely extinguishing the fire and depositing the ashes or coals from such fire, after they have cooled sufficiently, in receptacles provided for waste. (11) Perform acts prohibited by article II of chapter 22. (12) Set, lay or prepare or use any trap, snare, artificial light, net bird line, ferret, hawk or any contrivance or device whatever for the purpose of catching, taking or killing any bird or wild creature. The prohibition in this subsection shall not apply to trapping by- any means or methods done by the city, or done under its direction, or done by any other governmental agency or department with the written permission of the city manager, or done by any person with a valid trapping license issued by the state and with the written permission of the city manger. All trapping shall be done in accordance with state law. (13) Start or land an airplane, helicopter, balloon or other aircraft without the written permission of the manager. (14) Consume intoxicating or nonintoxicating malt liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor, as defined in chapter 4, except that: a• 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is dispensed by the city or by an authorized agent of the city may be consumed subject to other 1,41..n• / /1:L.,•.,, -., mi„in�+.10 n�w.lr..•..,4 nor.v7l.— RrnI;.- fTTl =1 G 1 G 7R .UrrT%A-D.n,,.. +- 1,}f..01-Zo01 10 /)7 /) A 1 n Municode Page 2 of 3 applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 in the following places: 1 Inside the clubhouse building or on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the clubhouse building at Braemar Golf Course and at Fred Richards Golf Course. 2• Inside the Edinborough Park building, the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum building, the building at Arneson Acres Park, the Edina Art Center Building, the Edina Senior Center and on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to such buildings. b• 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city pursuant to a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued in accordance with chapter 4 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 within the confines of the ball field complex at Van Valkenburg Park. C. 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4 -2 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 on the grounds of Braemar Golf Course. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4 -2 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 on the grounds of Fred Richards Golf Course. d• 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor and wine may be consumed at sidewalk cafes which are licensed in accordance with chapter 4 and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24 -313. e. Alcoholic beverages may be consumed on premises holding a temporary on- sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license or a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to chapter 4 and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24 -346. (15) Destroy, injure or tamper with any sewer, storm sewer, water main, culvert or any part thereof, including manhole covers, tanks or valves. (16) Hitch any animal to a lamp post, hydrant, drinking fountain, tree or other structure or picket an animal to the ground. (17) Park or occupy a vehicle or occupy a street or sidewalk to sell any farm produce or any other product or property, or for conducting any business or selling of services, except as provided in section 24 -259. (18) Place any vehicle to display the vehicle for sale or exchange. (19) Work, grease, repair, change oil or maintain in any way a vehicle, except as necessitated by an emergency. (20) Use a skateboard, roller skates, in -line roller skates or blades, or similar devices: a• In a municipal parking facility; b• On or across a sidewalk within or adjoining property in the PC -1, PC -2 or PC -3 districts, as defined by chapter 36; or C. Upon the traveled portion of a street. 1.. u......// 1: L.........«.......,.,.,]..,......,./...«:. . +....,....7L.- P...l:o.,. +TTI -1 C1 1 0i')7i)nla Municode Page 3 of 3 Notwithstanding this subsection (20), roller skates or in -line roller skates or blades may be used on the traveled portion of streets, if no adjoining sidewalk is present. (21) Feed any wild animal or bird, or deposit a food source for wild animals or birds. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1230.02, Ord. No. 1222, Ord. No. 1222 -A1, 11 -29 -1978, Ord. No. 1222-A2,11-28-1979,- Ord. No. 1222 -A3, 6- 24- 1987, Ord. No. 1993 -5, 4 -28 -1993; Ord. No. 1994 -6, 7 -27 -1994, Ord. No. 1995 -6, 8 -17- 1995, Ord. No. 1997 -14, 12 -15 -1997, Ord. No. 1999 -7, 3 -15 -1999; Ord. No. 2001-7,10-3-2001; Ord. No. 2002 -10, 1- 21- 2003, Ord. No. 2004 -8, 5-27 -2004, Ord. No. 2004 -10, 8 -12 -2004; Ord. No. 2010 -03, 2 -16 -2010, Ord. No. 2011- 11, 12 -6 -2011; Ord. No. 2012 -04, 2 -21 -2012) -A- S1 I0/')7/7n1A Municode Page 1 of 1 Sec': 24-399. Operation of certain devices prohibited. No person shall use a skateboard; roller skates, in -line roller skates or blades, bicycles, scooters or similar devices on or within any municipal: parking facility. (Code 1970, Code 1992, § 1235.05,' Ord. No. 1232,- 10 =13- 1976, Ord-No. 1232 -A1, 5-7 -1980, Ord. No. 1232 -A2, 9 -25 -1985; Ord. No. 1232 -A3, 12 -13 -1989; Ord. No. 1.995 -6, 8- 17- 1995, Ord. No. 2006 -5; 9 -5 -2006) 4, httD"S://Iibrarv".mum'code.com/Drint.asnx?h=&clientlD=l 5157&HTMReauest=htti)s%3a%... 10/27/2014 Cnym 0 'FN'AV�' 31 KEEDI NA RECOMMENDATION TO: ETC RE: Recommendation to modify Sec. 24 -399 of City Code ' DATE: July 11, 2014 Background Sec. 24 -399 of Edina City Code reads: "No person shall use a skateboard, roller skates, in -line skates or blades, bicycles, scooters or similar devices on or within any municipal parking facility." Sec. 24 -395 (1) and (2) read: "The term `municipal parking facility' means any lot or ramp, and the lanes giving ingress thereto and egress therefrom, and all accessories thereof, owned or operated by the City or the housing and redevelopment authority of the City, herein called `HRA,' and made available to the public for parking of private motor vehicles whether for a fee or at no cost. The term `municipal parking facility' does not include parking spaces located along public streets and highways." Bike Edina members discussed the ordinance and how it prohibits bicycle access to City facilities, including parks, unless a bicyclist rides on the sidewalk. Members understood the probable intent of the ordinance but believed that is written too broadly. A motion was approved to recommend modifying Sec. 24 -399 of City Code by striking the word "bicycles." The group agreed that, just as with the biking on sidewalks ordinance, safety education should go along with the ordinance change. See draft meeting notes, section highlighted in blue. Recommendation: Recommend to the City Council that the City Council modify Sec. 24 -399 of City Code by striking the word "bicycles." MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 . 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Scherer, Schroeder, Hobbs, Seeley, Forrest, Carr, Lee, Olsen, Halva, Staunton Members absent from roll: Platteter 1111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Forrest moved approval of the September 10, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Lee moved approval of the August 13, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak; being none, Commissioner Lee moved to close community comment. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; public comment closed. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A.. Variance.: Bill Robey /Mike Erickson. 5808 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported the subject property is located on the northeast corner of Crescent Terrace and Bywood West. The site is- 1.02 acres in size and is located in the Rolling Green neighborhood. The proposed new home would have setbacks further from the north side lot line and further back from Crescent Terrace than the existing home. The existing home has a 12 foot side yard setback (north lot line), and the new home would be 18.6 feet. The existing home has a 30 -foot setback to Crescent Page 1 of 12 1 Terrace, and the proposed home would.be setback -61.5 feet. This is the setback where the variance is required. Teague explained that the subject property is approximately 110 feet in width (as measured 50 feet back from the front property line) and is 44,456 square feet (1.02 acres) in area. The lot is rolling in topography. There are two existing single - family homes 'on the north and eastern lots, one facing Bywood West and one home facing Crescent Terrace. The Bywood home is located 102:3 feet from the front property line, and the Crescent Terrace home is located 74.7 feet from the front property line. Continuing, Teague said the property owner is requesting to tear down the existing home and build a new home on the property in a location that does not meet the, Crescent Terrace front yard setback. Section 36 -439, 1 (a) requires,a front yard setback equal to the average setback of the two abutting homes. The average setback of, the two abutting homes is 91 feet. As a corner lot, the property owner may choose the front yard. The appliant has chosen Bywood West as the front street. Cresent Terrace then becomes the side street. However, because the home to the east faces Crescent Terrace, the side street setback becomes a front street setback, and they must match the front street setback of the abutting home, which is 74.7 feet. The Planning Commission is currently analyzing the interpretation of this particular ordinance requirement, but under any interpretation, the proposal needs a variance approved in order to, construct in the proposed location. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested Variance based on the following findings: I . The proposed location of the house is reasonable. It would be located further away from the north side lot line and Crescent Terrace than the existing home. 2. The applicant could locate the home on the lot to meet all setback requirements; however, it would move the home much closer to the adjacent lot to the north, and create less area for drainage. 3. The practical difficulty in this instance is the narrow lot combined with the large front street setbacks of the abutting homes, which make the building area minimal compared to the size of the .lot. 4. The proposed home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed addition will complement the existing neighborhood homes. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: • Survey date stamped August 13, 20.14 • Building plans. date stamped August 14, 2014; and • Engineering Memo dated. September 2 with revisions dated September 10, 2014 Page 2 of 12' (/ Appearing for the Applicant Bill Robey, Tom Rauscher, Rauscher & Associates and interested neighbors. Discussion.' Chair Staunton stated he would like to thank the applicant for their excellent exhibits; especially the exhibit indicating the outline of existing and proposed house. ADDlicant Presentation Mr. Rauscher.informed Commissioners that he worked hard with the property owner on locating a house that wouldn't negatively impact the adjoining properties. Rauscher said the house is positioned to provide adequate spacing for the subject property and house to their north. Rauscher said the issue is also aesthetic, adding in his opinion the house placement proposed works best with the site. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Comment The following spoke in support of the variance: Kevin Gilligan, 5804 Crescent Terrace, Edina, MN Paul Bachman, 4817 Bywood West, Edina, MN Discussion Commissioner Scherer commented that she supports the request as submitted. Scherer pointed out that traditionally corner lots are difficult. She stated in her opinion the aesthetic style and design is pleasing and compatible with the neighborhood. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved variance approval based on staff findings and 'subject to staff conditions; survey date stamped August 13, 2014, building plans date stamped August 13, 2014, and Memo from .Ross Bintner dated September 2, 2014 and revised on September 10, 2014.; Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Conditional Use Permit. Ted &Amy Carlson. 55 16 Knoll Drive, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner. Teague reported that Ted Carlson has submitted a conditional use permit on behalf of the property owners to increase the first floor elevation 1.97 feet higher than the current first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 5516 Knoll Drive. Page 3 of 12 J Teague explained that a Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The current home located at 55.16 Knoll Drive has a first floor elevation at 954.97 feet above sea level. The proposal is to tear down the house to the existing foundation and -re -build on the existing foundation, but increase the 'base ment height by 1.5 feet and increase the floor trusses by 8 inches, . for a total of 2.16 feet increase in first floor elevation. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must.be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped August 8, 2. 014 • Building plans and elevations date stamped August 8, 2014 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo dated August 1, 2014. Appearing for the Applicant Ted & Amy Carlson, property owners. Discussion Commissioner Forrest said she wonders if the variance request can be heard as requested. She said she is unsure of the legality of requesting a variance from eligibility conditions. Planner Teague responded in the past the Commission has heard variances from the eligibility requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. A discussion continued with Commissioners discussing the methods indicated for storm water management notingthe suggestion of Ross Bintner recommending an alternative. Nick Adams, City Engineering responded that the applicant revised the plan (at the recommendation of the Engineering Department) and the plan now provides an alternative for drainage; down the backyard slope. Flow would drain to an area-of level ground and the °retaining =wall. Applicant Presentation Ted Carlson addressed the Commission and said he was very excited about the project. He pointed out the lot is a large lot and lot coverage would be around 8 %. Carlson acknowledged they revised their storm water management plan to include a gutter system, and additional plantings to handle the water runoff. Carlson asked for their support. Page 4of12 LJ q Public Hearin Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. No comments. Commissioner Scherer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Lee said she was very pleased to see reuse of the.existing foundation and preservation of a rambler. She added in her opinion the plans as proposed is'a sensitive way to rebuilt and revitalize a rambler. Lee said she supports the project as presented. Commissioner Staunton said he agrees with Commissioner Lee. He reminded the Commission part of the goal of the I -foot rule was to prevent homes from being built out of scale with the neighborhood. He said in this instance the request makes sense and the house certainly matches the neighborhood. Commissioner Forrest stated she can't support the request procedurally and the variance is self - imposed. Teague responded his research indicated that the Commission and Council have approved two such requests one in Indian Hills and the other in the Sunnyslope neighborhood. The discussion continued with the majority of Commissioners believing the request under the circumstances made sense and there would be no negative impact to the neighborhood. Motion Commissioner Scherer moved Conditional Use Permit approval based on staff fndings and subject to staff conditions to include the revised storm water maintenance plan. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Hobbs, Carr, Olsen, Lee, Staunton. Nay, Forrest. Motion carried. C. Final Rezoning and Final Site Plan with Variances. Frauenshuh. S 108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate is proposing to tear .down an existing 12,199 square foot office building and build a new 10,000 square foot retail building that would include a drive - through. The property is located at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, just west Page 5 of 12 of Highway 100, and is located across the street from retail uses that are zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Retail uses to the south include the Shell Gas Station, Burger King, Dairy Queen, and a small retail strip center. North and east of the site are office /light industrial uses. This request has received the following approvals from the City Council: 1. Preliminary Rezoning from POD - I, Planned Office District - I, to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District -2. 2. Preliminary Development Plan with consideration of Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 33 and 25 feet. 3. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. Teague further explained that the proposed plans are generally consistent with the approved Preliminary Plan. The. applicant has slightly revised the plans per the recommendations of the Planning Commission and .City Council, including shifting the building back to the north to create more patio space in front of the building. The applicant has not however, provided boulevard trees or additional landscaping along Edina Industrial Boulevard as was requested. The applicant believes that trees and additional landscaping would be difficult to maintain, cause problems for snow storage, and trees would. block visibility to the building for the retail tenants. The boulevard area is 10 feet wide;., therefore, there,is adequate area for some tree planting and landscaping. Hennepin' County requires trees to be planted six feet back from the curb. Trees could be planted to meet that.standard. The acity engineer has reviewed the plan and believes the area could be landscaped including trees and still could be maintained. The City of Edina would be responsible for the plowing of snow on this sidewalk in the winter. Teague stated the following is requested'for this final review: 1. Final Rezoning from POD -I, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District; and 2. Final Development Plan with Front Yard Setback Variances from 35 to 33 and 25 feet. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from POD- I, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Final Development Plan with Variances to tear down the existing retail building at 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard and build a 10,000 square foot retail building as proposed. Approval is subject to the4ollowing findings: I.The proposed rezoning meets the criteria in Section 36 -216, as noted on Pages 4 -7 above,,in regard to rezoning property. The project would be consistent with the Comprehensive -Plan. The project would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties; would not result in an overly intensive land use; would not result in undue traffic congestion or hazards; and with the excepti6h�of the setback variances Woiuld conform to all zoning ordinance requirements. 2. Theproposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The uses to.the south exist today as neighborhood commercial. uses. The proposed limited retail uses and PCD -2 zoning would complement and enhance this limited retail area. 3. The variance criteria are met. The proposed variance is reasonable. The practical difficulty is the small size of the site. A building could be located on the site to meet all the applicable setback - requirements, however, the result would be a building located in the middle of the site with parking lots in front. Page 6 of 12 4 4. The unique circumstances are the small size of the property and location as a corner lot.. The building could be moved back to meet required setbacks, however, would create a parking lot in the front-While there are other small corner lots in the PCD -2 Districts, these circumstances are generally; unique compared'to.all PCD -2 District properties. S. The following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan would be met: "Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent'street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment." This would be the first building in this area to be brought up to the street. Currently there are no sidewalks on the site. The proposed boulevard style sidewalk will encourage pedestrian movement in the area. 6. The traffic and parking study done by Wenck concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with.the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 20, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped August 20, 2014. Utility plan date stamped August 20, 2014. • Landscaping plan date-stamped August 20, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped August 20, 2014 Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Additional landscaping, including deciduous trees shall be, planted within the boulevard, subject to review and approval of the city. forester- and city engineer .4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer memo dated July 15, 20149 including entering into a developer's agreement for construction of utilities and sidewalks. 7. The Final Lighting.Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36:of the Zoning Ordinance.8. Dedication of an easement over the proposed sidewalk, subject to approval ofthe city-engineer. Appearing for the Applicant David Anderson, Frauenshuh, Nick Sperides Page 7 of 12 Commissioner Forrest asked if the placement of the monument sign is correct. Planner Teague responded all signs would conform to ordinance requirements. ;Commissioner Scherer suggested adding additional landscaping around the monument sign when it's installed. Applicant Presentation Mr. Anderson told the Commission he has been working with the City ;forester and will bring some trees to the boulevard. ,Anderson said one hesitation with regard to boulevard trees is what happens after the two. years of required maintenance. He pointed out with Minnesota weather, snow. removal and storage and maintenance issues longevity could become an issue. Anderson said he also doesn't wantto "over plant" the boulevard area. Mr. Sperides with the aid of- graphics indicated the patios at the end of the building noting that they are now attached to the sidewalk. Commissioner Lee asked if they know what type of materials would be used for the patio hard surface areas. Mr. Sperides responded that at this time they area planning on concrete hard surfaces. Commissioner Lee said she would encourage the use of pavers. Continuing, Lee asked if they ever considered flipping the elevations. She said she has a concern that the "back doors" face the street and the doors indicated on the plans would be locked. She stated she worries about street engagement. Concluding, Lee stressed the use of pavers vs. concrete. Commissioner Schroeder commented that Commissioner Lee brought up a good point about the doors facing the street and asked if the doors would be open to the public�or.locked. Mr. Anderson responded that the operation:of the doors would be up to the individual tenant. Anderson explained he understands the Commissioners comments; however, much is up to the tenant, adding most retail shops have one entrance for safety and a customer control point. Continuing, Anderson said we also have to consider the customers that park their vehicles; it would be difficult for them to walk around to the other side of the building to gain access. A discussion ensued on tenant access, end doors and internal traffic flow. Commissioners also suggested that the landscaping plan be continuous, vegetation for all seasons. It was further suggested with regard to landscaping that a landscaping plan be submitted by a landscape architect. The discussion refocused on the traffic flow for the drive through with some Commissioner expressing worry about the potential for accidents. Mr. Sperides pointed out the plans for the drive through haven't changed; adding the majority of the traffic for the drive through will, come from Metro 'y Boulevard. It was further reiterated to the applicant that the Commission wants to see boulevard trees. It was pointed out that the trees indicated on the plan for the boulevard are smaller than the ones that will be removed. ' The Commission indicated their vision was to see trees of similar size on the boulevard. Page 8 of 12 1 Commissioner Carr stated she believes the plan is good, adding the applicant followed the direction of the Commission. She further pointed out that engaging the street is an excellent goal; however it is difficult to do "urban" in many areas of Edina. She pointed out while sidewalks are being implemented to afford a pedestrian experience street parking isn't allowed. She stated it's a conundrum for developers and the City. She agreed most retail experiences have one entrance and in this instance without street parking it makes sense to have the major entrances access the parking area; otherwise those that parked in the surface lot would have to walk around the building to access the tenants. Motion Commissioner. Olsen moved to recommend approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including the following: • Applicant is to replace trees removed with trees of the same caliper • Ensure. plantings that-are used create continuous landscaping zones that survive tough environments. • Ens'; re that signage meets code • Locate transformers, electrical, mechanical to the south side • Add directional signage for the drive- through off of Metro Boulevard Commissioner Schroeder said he understands the dilemma in keeping doors.open to the public; however, in his opinion with regard to the two end units on the south side of the building those entrances should remain open to the public during regular business hours. Schroeder offered that as an amendment. • Doors on the south side shall remain open during regular business hours. Commissioner Olsen said she accepts that amendment. Chair Staunton stated he supports the request as submitted with amendments. Staunton said the Commission needs to better articulate what we mean by pedestrian friendly, and vibrant streetscape. He acknowledged it appears,the Commission goes round and round about this and in fairness to applicants we need to be straight forward. Commissioner Carr said while she has no objection to the conditions of "keeping the doors" open; that may be hard to enforce. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Hobbs, Olsen, Carr, Staunton. Nays, Lee, Forrest. Motion carried. 6 -2. Page 9 of 12 VII. 1 Reports and Recommendations A. Work Plan = 201-S Presentation Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to review the 2015 Work Plan. Planner Teague reported he took past discussion points and folded them into the work plan. Teague reported he also included with the packet the Edina Zoning Ordinance Process Tracker. He said this tracker should keep the Commission abreast of where we've been and where we're going.. Teague said he included as a continuation in the Process Tracker 1) Parking regulations /Proof of.parking; 2). Lighting Phase 2; and 3) Impervious Surface /Grading & Drainage. With regard to the three topics Teague said Parking is ongoing, Phase I of Lighting is proposed to be implemented .in 2014 with Phase 11 beginning in 2015, and grading and drainage continues to be reviewed by: the Engineering Department. Chair Staunton said it may be a,good time to add something about front street engagement standards or at minimum create a policy on what the City if after when suggesting that buildings move closer to the street and engage the street. Staunton said he has been :very frustrated that concept isn't easily communicated. Commissioner Scherer said she agrees. She also stated she believes the review should flexible. She pointed out sometimes it isn't feasible to move a building closer to the street, parking.can be accomplished in front of a building in an aesthetically pleasing manner. Scherer said in her opinion the goal of the City is to engage and be friendly to the pedestrian and flexibility should be allowed in framing this policy. Commissioner Schroeder said he agrees with that comment. He added the City needs to find a way for buildings to be connected to the street, adding the goal should be connectivity. Commissioner Olsen commented it would be good to draft a policy with some teeth. Chair Staunton said the Commission has made some inroads in encouraging engagement between structures and the street; however, better communication if needed. Commissioner Schroeder said the adoption of a "Living Streets" policy goes a long way in providing guidelines and beginning communication. Commissioner Forrest said in exploring policies they need to keep in mind the Comprehensive Plan where the majority of the City's policies and procedures, are located. Commissioners agreed. In all cases Commissioner Schroeder said when it comes to 'policy it's hard to dictate the private realm. Schroeder pointed out for certain policies to work everyone must be on board; both private and public Page, IQ,, of 12 realm. Schroeder said in his opinion the way buildings address the street needs to remain, on the work plan. Commissioner Forrest agreed adding it needs to be kept on the radar. Commissioner Hobbs stated storm water assessment is important and asked Planner Teague if a storm water audit of the City has been conducted. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioners expressed the desire to continue to keep all aspects of drainage and grading on the 2015 work plan. A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging that the drainage and grading component is monitored by engineering staff with the suggestion that drainage and grading be moved to the top of the list on the 2015 Work Plan. Commissioners indicated their support for the 2015 Work Plan as presented. Chair Staunton suggested that Commissioners e-mail Planner Teague if they think of additional changes and /or suggestions to the plan. Staunton said all work plans would be presented to the City Council at a pre- council work session. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. Chair and Commission Comments Chair Staunton welcomed new student member Madison Seeley; Madison is a junior at Edina High School. Chair Staunton reported that Edina kicked off Vision Edina. Staunton said the event was a good start with good attendance. Commissioner Lee and Commissioner Forrest reported on the progress of the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. It was noted that a Discovery Workshop would be held from 8 am — Noon on Saturday October I I th at the Edina Village Market. (Breakfast at 8 am at Snuffy's with a "walk- about" 9:00 am- Noon). - -- X. - Staff-.Comments Planner Teague informed the Commission since the first of the year the City has issued 120 demo permits and 83 new single family home permits. Jordan Gilgenbach reported that the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan can now be found on the City's website. www.edinamn.gov Page 11 of 12 XI. Adjournment Commissioner Hobbs moved meeting adjournment at 9:35 pm. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. pectfully submi ed Page 12 of 12 MINUTES OF -CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 18, 2014' . 6:00 1) .M. ROLL CALL Answering roll:call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Olson, Rummel, Spanhake . and Whited. ABSENT Member lyer. New student members Ana Rummel and Jack Campbell were introduced and welcomed. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Whited to approve the amended meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21,'201 Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Whited to approve the amended minutes of August 21, 2014. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Adam Gildner; 5436 Brookview Avenue, said he was in attendance to provide an update to the ongoing requests from residents for a 4 -way stop sign "at 55th & Brookview. Mr. Gildner said a request was made June 2010, March 2011 and again in July 2014'. He said.he understood, that the criteria was not met to warrant installing stop signs but believes special -)nsideration should be given because of the near -miss accidents that are seen almost daily. He said there is broad support .,i the community for control improvements at the intersection which he believes would be low cost and easy to fix (he stated that there is not a speed issue). REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 13, 2014 A.1. Planner Nolan was asked why the video study was done during the mid-day when the busiest is the mornings and!. evenings and he said this was probably due to availability of the camera. Discussion ensued about members' experiences and observations of the intersection and the consensus was that an alternative to stop sign was needed. Traffic calming in general will be added to a future agenda for discussion. A.2. Planner Nolan was asked about the proposal and he said it was for installation of the north -leg crosswalk (west -leg has existing crosswalk). B.1. Member Janovy said she did not see the reason for denying warrants. She recommended a better explanation for the denial and moving the request to Section C to review the warrants more critically. B.2. The consensus was that traffic calming was needed instead of stop signs. Traffic calming will be discussed at a future date not just for this intersection but to address citywide concerns. B.3. The posted speed limit is 30 mph and planner Nolan explained that this was a temporary situation that would be corrected before staff could implement anything. B.4. Member Janovy suggested forwarding this request to Park & Recreation. .7. Planner Nolan said the City does not have a policy for handicap permit parking. 1 D.I. This request is partially related to TH -169 reconstruction. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to approve the August. 13, 2014, Traffic Safety 3mmittee Report with the following amendment: move B.1. to Section C and refer B.4. to the Park and Recreation Department. All voted aye. Motion carried. Draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan Planner Nolan said the Planning Commission (PC) will be holding a public hearing on Oct. 22 for feedback on the plan. He said the PC is holding the public hearing because City Council plans to amend the Transportation Comprehensive Plan to include the Sidewalk Facilities Plan immediately upon approval and the PC is the authorized body to handle this. Planner Nolan said the plan was developed with input from the ETC, Living Streets Advisory Group, and Engineering staff. He said staff reviewed each sidewalk and supporting data and some were removed or added based on supporting criteria. Feedback provided by the ETC included the following: • If City Council approves this plan, the sidewalk on Valley View Road that was not approved as part of Birchcrest B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction should be included in construction next year because it is on the plan for installation. • Be transparent with the data for each sidewalk; verify that the sidewalks on the plan are the ones that make sense; do they advance the vision of the community for the residents to be able to travel safely, independently and have mobility; is the right criteria being used; does it create a network. Consensus was yes and it is a plan that can change in the future if needed. • Staff did a good job of using supporting data for the sidewalks that are included. • Revise page 2, 3rd paragraph to read 'Sidewalks and paths provide safe movements for individuals of all ages and many abilities.' • Should the plan state construction schedule? Planner Nolan said the Living Streets Plan is probably a better place to talk about construction schedule. • Planner Nolan was asked if Park & Recreation was included and he said staff is having ongoing conversation with Director Kattreh. • In addition to including supporting data, also include what hasn't been decided yet, for example, the side of street the sidewalk will be on. • City Council should hold the public hearing and then forward the approved plan to the PC for inclusion in the Comp Plan. The concern is that the plan is the ETC's responsibility and not the PC's. There are probably legal and philosophical reasons for amending the Comp Plan but it does not need to be done immediately. • Can the ETC and PC have a work session to make sure the PC understands the ETC's vision of the plan since they are taking public comments? • This plan is very different than the previous sidewalk map; are sidewalks prioritized? Planner Nolan said the understanding is that Active Routes to School will get priority. • What is the risk of the PC holding the public hearing? Residents may feel short- changed if they are not heard directly by the City Council. It needs public acceptance and if it appears that they did not reach out to the public it could backfire. • A risk might be that certain sidewalks are taken out. Planner Nolan said he was led to believe the PC would not do this. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to recommend approval of the Sidewalk Facilities Plan, and whereas, the plan reflects thoughtful construction of criteria, is data driven, and most importantly is consistent with the vision and value of supporting the transportation needs of all residents. `II voted aye. ,lotion carried. 2015 Valley View Road Reconstruction Draft Engineering Report Planner Nolan said staff has already identified changes that will be made'before. the report goes to City Council. Public .Works, Fire and Police are also reviewing the report. Staff is recommending decorative streetlights along the sidewalk based n feedback from the ETC and residents; and residents are currently being surveyed to determine the style of light. Planner Nolan said he would take comments back to the project engineer. Comments • What caused traffic volume to go down so much from 2005? • Add the new Sidewalk Facilities Plan to the report when it is approved. • Explain the purpose of the right -of -way to residents and that they are not taxed on land in the right -of -way; this may help to get more support for sidewalks. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Nelson to forward the report with comments. All voted aye. Motion carried. 2015 Work Plan Approval Planner Nolan will' make minorr amendment to the plan. Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Whited to approve the plan. All voted aye. Motion carried. Ordinance Discussion: Bicycling in Municipal Parking Facilities Member Janovy said the current ordinance does not allow riding bike in municipal facility and this includes parking lots. She suggested striking the word "bicycle" as the simplest fix as recommended by Bike Edina. 4nother recommendation was to add 'except for the purpose of parking and /or thru travel' at the end of the current rdinance because the intent is to allow all modes of transportation but prevent people from recreating in these areas, example, skate boarders. It was asked if they are trying to fix a problem that does not exist and chair. Bass said recommending a revision to the ordinance allows them to make future plans for municipal facilities where they may want to have bike parking, repair stations, etc., similar to other cities. Motion .was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Whited to draft an advisory communication recommending that City Council add 'except for the purpose of parking and /or thru travel'. After further discussion the motion was withdrawn because there wasn't consensus that this was the right solution although there was acknowledgment that the current ordinance creates a hurdle for future changes. Member Janovy- suggested writing an advisory communication to the City Council similar -to the one they did for the taxi cab ordinance revision where they did not suggest a solution. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Nelson to write an advisory communication to the City Council recommending that the ordinance be revised. The advisory will clearly state the ETC's intent but not suggest any particular revision language. All voted'aye. Motion carried. Walk Edina Working Group Member Boettge. who will chair this working group said it will be similar -to Bike Edina and will be a forum for pedestrians to Ik about pedestrian safety issues. Chair Bass recommended pursuing a Walk Friendly designation similar to the Bike Friendly designation as one of their first goals. i 3 Motion was made by chair Bass and seconded by member Olson to approve the Walk Edina Working Group and appoint member Boettge as chair. II voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members Student member Rummel asked if the ETC controlled the high school's parking lot and she was told no, but they've often talked about having a student body that would help to identify solutions. Member Rummel said a traffic circle may help because this would prevent drivers turning left from waiting a long time to get out. Planner Nolan said the school district recently received bids for reconfiguring the parking lot but they were rejected because the bids were too high. He said city engineer Millner is meeting regularly with the school district on this issue. Bike Edina Working Group — Minutes of August 14, 2014 Member Janovy said they had a guest that talked about bike maps; next month is their annual meeting and they will work on their Work Plan and bring to the ETC for approval. Living Streets Working Group The group reviewed and revised the Sidewalk Facility Plan. Communications Committee The committee wrote a blog post. One concern from the beginning was that they would not contribute to blog posts if they were not promoted by the other media outlets such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. and it was not. They asked if they could do video blogs and asked about the requirements for photos releases. Planner Nolan will follow up on this. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - no discussion. HAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Nelson said it was interesting reading a Star Tribune article about the lid over TH -100 that he suggested 4 -years ago when they asked for crazy ideas for the Grandview area. He said it was interesting seeing it coming up for discussion. Regarding the high school traffic, member Nelson said eventually they'll have to begin discussion of this area to find a solution. He thanked planner Nolan for promoting Living Streets in the high school homecoming parade. Member Whited thanked planner Nolan for his work in submitting the request for the traffic study in the Chowen area to the University of Minnesota. Member La Force said he noticed two 'cross traffic does not stop' signs at the top of the TH -100 ramp at Benton, an area that he's mentioned in the past. Planner Nolan said he was not aware of their installation and that it was probably done by MNDOT. He said he attended the City's visioning session and the conversation seemed to have been focused on transportation and sidewalks and everyone in attendance seemed to be in agreement that sidewalks are needed. He said he was not sure if this was a true representation of the citizenry or just a group of like- minded people. Member Boettge asked student member Rummel her opinion of school bus drivers in reference to how they drive and traffic at the high school. Member Rummel said the bus drivers use every opportunity to get back on the road as quickly as possible but she thinks student drivers are the biggest problem. Member Janovy said she would like to learn more about a sidewalk that City of St. Louis Park recently installed on W. 391h Street. She said they went to great expense to install a sidewalk on a low volume street and one of their councilmembers explained that it was done because it was a route to school and a couple other reasons that justified the cost. She compared Iiis to Wooddale Avenue that failed due to cost because adding bump outs would have required moving catch basins even .hough this would have made it better. 4 STAFF COMMENTS 2014 Project Update: • The three remaining neighborhood roadway reconstruction projects are on schedule for completion this fall; two are already completed; • France Avenue Pedestrian Intersection Enhancement — stage 3 is on schedule for completion in Oct. The County does not allow 'stop here on red' signs so staff is looking at adding stop bars; • The roundabout at Hazelton Road is open; • 2014 Sidewalk Improvements — York Avenue is completed; Vernon Avenue started this week; Valley View Road is next; • Olinger Blvd mill and overlay started this week; • Xerxes Avenue at crosstown mill and overlay is starting tomorrow and the bump outs next week; • The advisory communication to City Council regarding revision of taxi cab ordinance was approved; • The 601h & Chowen area traffic study that was submitted to University of MN was not selected; there are fewer students in the fall so it is on the list for consideration in the spring; ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2014 NAME TERM J F' M A M J J A S O N D SM 2127 SM 3110 WS # of 3118 Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 10 lass, Katherine 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Boett e, Emil 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Campbell, Jack student 1 1 10% I er, Su rya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Olson, Larry 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Rummel, Anna student 1 1 10% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3 30% S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Van Dyke, Jackson student 1 1 2 20% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1F, 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 'Cancelled due to weather ct submitted, ison, ecretary w91� ,l'� U, � �y tBAa To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V From: Chad A. Millner P.E., Director of Engineering Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: November 3, 2014 Information El Subject: Authorize Engineering Services — Design and Construction Inspection for Lighting and Landscaping Components of the France Avenue Corridor Improvements Action Requested: Authorize Executive Director to approve attached proposal for Engineering Services with WSB, Inc. for Design and Construction Inspection for Lighting and Landscaping Components of the France Avenue Corridor Improvements. Information / Background: The $83,000 proposal is an hourly, not to exceed amount for design and construction inspection services for lighting and landscape components associated with the France Avenue Corridor Improvements. These additional services are required due to the expanded scope of the project. They include increased coordination with area business and construction inspection services during the 3 -year landscaping warranty period. Parts of the continued inspection of the landscaping warranty period may be completed in -house if staffing levels allow. This will be funded by the Centennial Lakes Tax - Increment Financing District funds. WSB has served as the primary engineer for the project and have completed design and construction services. They are well suited to provide these additional services based on .their thorough knowledge of the project. Staff recommends authorizing the Executive Director to approve the attached proposal. Attachments: Proposal for Landscape and Lighting Construction Administration and Design Services G:IPWICENTRAL SVCSIENG DIVIPROJECTSICONTRACTS120141ENG 14 -I4 France Ave_Hazelton Rd LandsapelADMIN_A.2591MISC11tem HRA V. WSB Inspection Services Landscaping.docx City of Edina - 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 WSB & Assocfatw, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction October 13, 2014 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Landscape and Lighting Construction Administration and Design Proposal for Engineering Services City of Edina, MN Dear Mr. Millner: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 5414800 Fax: 763 5414700 WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) are pleased to submit the attached proposal for the Landscaping and Lighting Engineering Services for improvements on France Avenue. These improvements are associated with the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project, but were not included in the original scope of that project. Some of the work associated with this proposal has already been completed. It should be noted, we attempted to wrap these costs in with the original project but we exceeded the original contract and thus need to request the additional compensation. Two separate plan sets were created for this work; one for the landscape plan and one for the lighting plan. Each plan required additional time to create and design the plan set, as well as time for construction administration and coordinating with businesses. The landscape plan includes a 3 year maintenance period to ensure sustainability of the landscape elements. This will require reviewing scouting reports and performing site visits to ensure the maintenance is being accomplished. If you have any questions about this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763 -287- 7149. Sincerely, WS & Assocuns, INC. 4K An w P wman, PE Project Manager Attachments Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer France Avenue Landscape and Lighting Construction Administration and Design Engineering Services SCOPE OF WORK Task 1— Landscape Design and Plan Set This task included developing concepts for landscaping the corridor. This task evolved over the duration of the project, which included multiple stakeholder meetings and LHB, the landscape architecture f rm developing multiple concepts. Ultimately, a separate plan set was completed by WSB and LHB. Task 2 — Lighting Design and Plan Set This task included developing concepts for the signature lighting along the corridor. It was originally proposed to develop pedestrian level lighting at the corners of the intersections. Due to the emphasis on creating a signature for the corridor, the concept evolved to a 30' signature light at the intersections of France Avenue & 76th Street, 70th Street and 66th Street. This included a separate plan set to be created for the lighting. Task 3 — Lighting and Landscape Construction Administration This task includes general oversight and observation of the construction of the landscape and lighting plans. This project overlapped with the France Avenue pedestrian improvement plan, which included a full time inspector. The landscape and lighting plan required an extra month of observation beyond what was required for the pedestrian improvement plan. In addition, the business liaison coordination also extended for an additional month. Coordination was required to make certain the property owners were aware of the improvements and help tie in the proposed landscape with the existing landscape at the property. Task 4 — Landscape Maintenance Period Observation The landscape project includes a 3 year maintenance period for the contractor. This includes submitting scouting reports and performing monthly maintenance. WSB and/or LHB will provide services to make certain the scouting reports are being completed and the maintenance is being performed on the project. It is anticipated the project team will utilize 8 hours per month of observation during the 3 year maintenance period. Proposal — France Avenue Page t Landscape and Lighting City Of Edina ESTIMATED COST The table below shows WSB's estimate of the cost for the work described above. The estimated cost is $88,000. This includes WSB's labor at our standard hourly billing rates. WSB will bill the City for the actual hours worked up to the maximum of $83,000. Accepted on this day of , 2014 City of Edina Scott Neal, Its Executive Director Proposal — France Avenue Page 2 Landscape and Lighting City Of Edina Tasks Project Cost Task 1 Set — Landscape Design and Plan $9,000 Task 2 = Lighting Design and Plan $8,000 Task 3 — Lighting and Landscape Construction Administration $37,000 Task 4 — Landscape Maintenance Period Observation $29,000 Total Cost $83,000 Accepted on this day of , 2014 City of Edina Scott Neal, Its Executive Director Proposal — France Avenue Page 2 Landscape and Lighting City Of Edina MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION September ,23, 201'4 6:00 PM City Hall - Community Room CALL TO ORDER Chair Seidman called the meeting to order at 6:04pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Commissioners Arseneault „Bigbee, Davis, Gates, Kennedy, Sanders, Chair Seidman, Weinert, and Winnick. Staff present: Staff Liaison MJ Lamon, and City Management Fellow Lindy Crawford. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Bigbee to amend the Regular Meeting Agenda of September 23, 2014 to add guest presenter Jessi Kingston to item VI. G. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy. Motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF August 2.51-2014 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Commissioner Arseneault moved to approve the minutes as presented to the HRRC. Commissioner Kennedy seconded. Motion carried. V. 'COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Introduce 2014 -2015 New Student Members 2014 -2015 new student commissioners introduced themselves to the HRRC. B. Low Income Housing/Affordable Housing Guest speaker Joyce Repya gave a review of affordable housing and low income housing. Affordable housing is 30% or less of your adjusted gross income. Anything above, 30% is not considered affordable. Low income housing is defined based on the median income-and is subsidized. Joyce shared the current affordable housing numbers for the city of Edina. The Edina Housing Foundation is looking to create an affordable housing policy. Joyce suggested the HRRC could show support for the policy. C. Resolution to Rename Columbus Day Indigenous Peoples' Day Commissioners discussed the proposed Indigenous. Peoples' Day resolution. Commissioners suggested amending the language in the last paragraph to read "...in City calendar and other City documents as appropriate.” Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the resolution with suggested language change. Commissioner Winnick seconded. Motion carried. D. Finalize 2015 Work Plan Commissioners discussed the 2015 proposed HRRC Work Plan and suggested ideas for new initiatives. Draft of 2015 work plan will be submitted to City Staff on October 1, 2014 and presented to City Council on October 7, 2014 at a work session. E. Communication with City Council Staff Liaison Lamon informed Commissioners of. the various ways to communicate with City Council. Any item that is not on the HRRC Work Plan that goes to Council for consideration will be attached to the City Council agenda as an Advisory Communication under the Correspondence section. An item that is on the HRRC Work Plan that goes to Council will be considered as a Report and Recommendation and will be placed under the Reports and Recommendations section of the City Council agenda. F. Community Conversations Update Commissioners Bigbee and Davis stated the working group has fourteen volunteers for Community Conversations and nine of those volunteers have committed times to meet. G. NFL Team Name Change Resolution Guest Speaker Jessi Kingston spoke about the NFL Team Name Change resolution. Commissioners revised the Resolution to discard "Whereas the U of M stadium is located upon University of Minnesota property, and Whereas state and federal anti- discrimination laws prohibit offensive and derogatory behavior on public property. Commissioners revised the Resolution to include "Therefore be it resolved further that the Mayor is encouraged to communicate by letter our disapproval of the use of the term "Redskins" to the National Football League, Washington team, University of Minnesota, Minnesota Vikings, the media, state and federal legislative officials, and other interested parties." Commissioners suggested sending copies to state and federal legislatures. Commissioner Winnick moved to approve the NFL Team Name Change resolution with suggested changes. Commissioner Kennedy seconded. Motion carried. H. Edina Community Resource Center Update Commissioner Winnick updated the HRRC of the past Edina Resource Center meeting. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Commissioners reviewed correspondence received from the public by City Council. VIII. CHAIR, COMMISSION MEMBER, AND STUDENT COMMENTS A. 3CMA Conference Update Commissioner Bigbee gave an update to the HRRC about the 3CMA Conference he attended and for which he was a guest speaker at. B. Next Meeting: October 28, 2014 Chair Seidman specified the HRRC will discuss the December I Id' annual televised meeting and noted there will be no monthly meeting in November. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Lamon asked commissioners if someone would write a blog post. Commissioner Winnick stated he would forward information about the Edina Resource Center to Commissioner Carter for consideration in a blog post. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Kennedy to adjourn the September 23rd meeting, Bigbee seconded. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:14pm. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC October 28, 2014 MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison Jan Seidman, HRRC Chair 1 1 M E GCS MV 70 Bloomington Public Health Serving Bloomington, Edina and Richfield Bonnie Paulsen, Public Health Administrator "Everyday, Bloomington Public Health strives to improve the quality of life for residents in the communities we serve." Dear Friends of Public Health, am very pleased to be writing this letter to you as your new Bloomington Public Health Administrator. In just one short month, I have come to realize what most of you likely already know about the health department - that we provide many activities on a daily basis to honor our commitment to a safe, healthy and vibrant community. As you read through this report, you will get a glimpse of the value that public health brings to your community. We protect the community's health by preventing diseases and responding to health threats, we influence conditions that promote health, such as access to healthy and affordable foods and neighborhoods that are safe for walking and biking and we work towards prevention of chronic diseases that have an effect on our health. Our main goal is to promote a healthier population. We address the health and needs of populations as a whole, through our work with individuals and families, community groups and coalitions. We know that healthy residents will create a solid foundation for a healthier community. Healthier communities are able to provide stronger economic and social benefits for everyone. In 2013, Karen Zeleznak submitted her retirement notice. Karen joined the department in 1999 and skillfully helped raise the profile of Bloomington Public Health in the community and gave us a road map for the future. We will no doubt continue to benefit from her leadership in the years to come. With change comes opportunity. am looking forward to the opportunity in the coming years to work with the wonderful and talented staff of Bloomington Public Health, the Advisory Board of Health and the Bloomington City Council to ensure Public Health's continued success well into the future. Here's to your health! &-xl� p 1 Table of Con tents What is Public Health? 3 Service Areas 4 Spotlight 5 Services Report 11 Community Results 17 Trends in Public Health Services 25 Accreditation 29 Community Participation 31 2013 Financials 33 2413 Staffing 34 Who we are i Mission j Goals Back 2 r Public health connects us all Public health is the science of protecting and improving the health of families and communities. It does this by promoting healthy lifestyles, preventing injuries and reducing transmission of infectious diseases. Overall, public health is concerned with protecting the health of entire populations. For example, if one person has whooping cough it is an important public health issue because this communicable disease can easily spread through the population. The Public Health Division seeks to assure a high level of protectionfrom health threats, including communicable disease, natural and intentional disasters, and preventable injuries. The Division also works to preventchronic diseases, such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes. To accomplish this, we use evidence -based practices to reduce chronic disease risk factors, such as poor nutrition, lack of physical activity and tobacco use. We also seek to improve responsiveness to serious public threats, including emerging infectious diseases and bioterrorism. In addition, public health works to iimitheaitb disparitiesby promoting healthcare equity, quality and accessibility. Public health's accomplishments include safer drinking water, infectious disease control, seatbelt safety laws, wide - spread vaccination, safer and healthier foods, and smoke -free dining and parks. With each success, we continue to improve the health of our population. 3 " ITY The Public Health Division is comprised of six service areas. Each area provides unique services that are vital to fulfilling the Division's mission to promote, protect and improve the health of our community. Service areas include the following: MMUTIF nlamm-nap► PrP- vP -ntInn & Cnntrnil Emergency Prep Family Health Vulnerable du �€ 'x i a �s With a nationally recognized, evidence -based home visiting program, Public In 2013, 67 families received 972 HFA home visits. These outcomes in the families that received the home visits illustrate successes: Families increase access to preventive health services 98% of families had a primary health provider 93% of families were current with well -child exams 95% of children through age two were fully immunized Children develop as expected after 15 ormore home visits in a 12 -month period 94% of children rated within average range for cognitive and physical growth . 90% of children rated within average range for behavioral /emotional milestones Children are raised in safer environments 97% of families had no reports of abuse or neglect 5 parents learll about early childhood development and ,parenting skills to make their family thrive. Health Nurses help parents who may have a history of trauma, are Nurses help vulnerable or frequently change residence. They help the parents learn overburdened about early childhood development, positive parenting skills and families avoid pursuing family goals. adverse childhood The Healthy Families America (HFA) home - visiting services begin experiences they either prenatally or right after baby is born. Visits are intensive and are at-risk for .. ; last for 3 to 4 years after birth. Participation is voluntary for families, however, eligible families that decline the program services are twice as likely to end up in the child protection system. In 2013, 67 families received 972 HFA home visits. These outcomes in the families that received the home visits illustrate successes: Families increase access to preventive health services 98% of families had a primary health provider 93% of families were current with well -child exams 95% of children through age two were fully immunized Children develop as expected after 15 ormore home visits in a 12 -month period 94% of children rated within average range for cognitive and physical growth . 90% of children rated within average range for behavioral /emotional milestones Children are raised in safer environments 97% of families had no reports of abuse or neglect 5 parents learll about early childhood development and ,parenting skills to make their family thrive. Rapid action by the first person on the scene of a cardiac arrest can make Effective and a real difference to the victim's outcome. In Bloomington in 2011, of Immediate bystander the over 8,000 emergency responses, 948 were cardiac events. CPR and AED use can The Heart Safe Bloomington program empowers citizens to take double if not triple a rapid action and increase the chances of survival for a sudden victim's chance of cardiac arrestvictim. This program 1) provides CPR (Cardio survival.. Pulmonary Resuscitation) training, 2) locates AEDs (Automated External Defibrillator) in the community, 3) places more AEDs in the community and 4) loans out CPR and AED training kits. Heart Safe Bloomington is a collaboration between Public Health, Police, Fire, and Allina EMS. funded by the Bloomington Community Foundation and MN Resuscitation Consortium through the Medtronic Foundation HeartRescue Project. Progress Since Program Began in 2011 • Trained 106 trainers including Community Emergency Response Team members and Bloomington Fire Fighters • Trained over 600 individuals in Anytime CPR • Identified 126 public AEDs in Bloomington • Developed 6 community loaner kits • Began preparing the application for Bloomington's Heart Safe City designation 6 It is aching CPR is pert of the Head Srife Bioorrzington program. 0 t To make the best use of abundant produce, the NEAT kitchen will help food shelf clients: • Learn about nutrition and how to cook in a kitchen with equipment they have at home • Take food home that was processed by the kitchen's commercial equipment from fruits and vegetables that are past peak freshness or too abundant for timely distribution • Taste samples of unfamiliar, healthy foods that are prepared from the commercial equipment to encourage them to sign up for VEAP's nutrition education and cooking classes 7 Sloomington Public Health Specialist, loan, at the NEAT kitchen open hawse. This year, we partnered with community organizations to improve The solution is a grew access to healthy food through donations for the VEAP (Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People) food shelf. As a result, the community example of what we contributed over 20,000 pounds of fresh vegetables and fruits. can accomplish when The challenge became distributing the produce before it went we work together and to waste. of how we can work Pondering the welcome dilemma, staff from Bloomington Public together to create a Health, VEAP and University of Minnesota Extension saw the healthy community . . . solution as a teaching kitchen in VEAP's new building at 9600 Aldrich Avenue. The group's enthusiasm for the idea resulted in adding the dedicated kitchen space to VEAP's new building plans, and VEAP's NEAT (Nutrition Education and Teaching) kitchen was born. To make the best use of abundant produce, the NEAT kitchen will help food shelf clients: • Learn about nutrition and how to cook in a kitchen with equipment they have at home • Take food home that was processed by the kitchen's commercial equipment from fruits and vegetables that are past peak freshness or too abundant for timely distribution • Taste samples of unfamiliar, healthy foods that are prepared from the commercial equipment to encourage them to sign up for VEAP's nutrition education and cooking classes 7 Sloomington Public Health Specialist, loan, at the NEAT kitchen open hawse. We learned what stands in the way of some people obtaining healthy food via a Community Food Assessment funded through SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Program). A Community Food Partnership was formed to guide the Assessment in which over 150 people from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield shared data and insights about the food situation in the community. The Assessment revealed that cost was the greatest barrier to healthy foods for low- income residents. It also found that accessibility issues such as transportation and safety posed challenges for Community Food Partnmltip members meet to discuss Community Food Assessment findings, some residents - particularly seniors. The problem of limited access To e healthy to and affordability of healthy foods can lead to an increased risk of living easier for chronic disease. everyone, vfe neede,,z, � � The Community Food Assessment tells us how we can make a to find out difference in helping all people to eat healthy. The next step is makes it herd for taking action, and that will be the focus of the Community Food some e - Partnership in 2014. 8 Edina - Top 10 Health Issues Richfield - Top 10 Health Issues Nutrition, Obesity and Physical Activity . Maternal and Child Health • Aging of the Population . Nutrition, Obesity and Physical Activity • Alcohol, Tobacco, Drug Use and Abuse . Social and Emotional Wellbeing • Social and Emotional Wellbeing . Sexual and Reproductive Health • Mental Illness • Mental Illness • Unintentional Injury • Aging of the Population • Intentional Injury Prevention . Alcohol, Tobacco and Drug Use and Abuse • Maternal and Child Health . Intentional Injury Prevention • Immunization and Infectious Disease . Individual and Family Emergency Prevention Preparedness • Health Care Access Immunization and Infectious Disease Prevention 9 0900 M6uoOOM a Trop 10 Heautto Uss ue§* *not in any order of prioritization ie �$ x �a to Clinical offer Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings, Cardiovascular Screenings and Health Risk Assessments. In addition, the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Nutrition Program provides nutrition education and food vouchers for low- income pregnant and breast feeding women, infants and children to age five. 11 ASSURING QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY 2013 WOMEN'S HEALTH • BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING Sage Program for uninsured and under - insured women age 40 and older. #clients • CARDIOVASCULAR SCREENING Sage Plus Program for cardiovascular education. This program was # -fie 7ts discontinued in summer of 2013. a f t F e g V v t t WIC (WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN) For nutritionally at -risk pregnant and breastfeeding women and children up to #clients/ five years of age. Provides nutrition education and food vouchers. # visits 12 Services Health Promotion is responsible for working to create environments that promote healthy choices for youth and the community in general. The main goals are to reduce health risks, such as smoking and obesity, and increase healthy behaviors.. s�D; The City's Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) held a workshop for Bloomington and Edina city leaders and planners to learn how they can make biking an easier and safer choice for residents. SHIP supports biking and other forms of active transportation to make healthy living easier for everyone. PROMOTING HEALTH IN THE COMMUNITY 2013 CLASSES AND OUTREACH Dimctedtostudents Information on preventing tobacco, drug and alcohol use; early sexual activity; teen pregnancy; sexually #student transmitted infections and other risk behaviors. Healthy behaviors, such attendees as increasing physical activity and healthy nutrition, are promoted. EDUCATIONAL PRESENTATIONS &=tedtopaients, adults, commuaitymembem Information on healthy behaviors, asset building, limit setting, alcohol, tobacco, other #attendees drugs and laws involving youth. STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRESENTATIONS Dimctedtohea lNiandcommunityoiga,7&a#ons Information on SHIP #attendees initiatives including physical activity, nutrition and tobacco reduction. SENIOR HEALTH PROMOTION Nurses talk with seniors about measures to promote healthy aging #attendees (at senior centers and senior housing complexes). CAR SEATS Staff persons, nationally certified as child passenger safety #carseats technicians, provide car seats and education to assure proper use by provided parents and children. 14 Services Disease Prevention & Control seeks to reduce risk factors and burdens of preventable, communicable diseases. It promotes healthy behaviors, conducts disease and risk factor surveillance, screens for early detection of disease and provides low -cost immunizations for children and adults. 2� PREVENTING INFECTIOUS DISEASE 2013 INFLUENZA Flu shots for adults and children administered on- and off -site. #seasonal NU s /1015 CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATIONS (048 YEARS) Immunizations fortetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, #clients/ hepatitis B, polio, Hib, varicella and pneumococcal disease. #shots ADULT IMMUNIZATIONS Immunizations for tetanus, hepatitis B, hepatitis A, polio and pneumococcal #clients/ disease. #shots MANTOUX Tuberculosis testing for employers, employees, students, immigrants and #tests job seekers. 16 Public Health Nurse, Hannah, immunizes a woman from the community. In addition to offering immunizations for children and adults at our clinic, Public Health also conducts high - volume flu shot clinics at community locations. 70/ 218 45/ 7/ 102 7 172 12 9/ 96/ 14 231 22 229 I NA We partnered with community organizations to collect fruit and vegetable donations for the VEAP food shelf amounting to 20,000 pounds —the weight of 20 elephants or a monster truck. We worked to keep all people in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield well by promoting, protecting and improvingtheir health. Supported 30 low- income English Language Learning families with young children to learn to navigate health information and the health care systems. Engaged with 4,487 students to prevent substance use and early sexual activity and to promote healthy behaviors. The Minnesota Department of Health awarded our Women Infants and Children (WIC) program for surpassing Healthy People 2020 breastfeeding goals. 90% of women who were on WIC for at least 3 months while pregnant, started breastfeeding their babies at birth to give their babies the best start for optimal growth and development. Provided 4,555 women, infants and children with nutrition education and food vouchers to promote healthier pregnancies and babies. 410 children are more ready for school having received assessments for behavioral, growth and developmental concerns and by accessing resources. i]71.1. ca. i Reduced likelihood of infectious diseases with immunizations for 4,834 people. We are helping to make walking and biking to school safer for 23,000 students by guiding Safe Routes to School plans in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield school districts. Public Health Nurses provided resources and education to support optimal health and wellbeing in families with children. Nurses made 2,941 home visits to 794 clients. Obtained a score 87% on the CDC assessment of our plans to mass dispense medications. 17 ig Health Improving Health > We kept 116 young > Partnered with community i Public Health Nurses made children safe while riding in organizations to create a home visits and provided cars by providing car seats Healthy Living Hub that consultation to adults that to families that are unable offers centralized services have health and safety to purchase them and for improving and issues. 79% of those giving instruction on proper promoting health to over clients receiving follow -up use. 3,000 Spanish - speaking services have improved Bloomington and Richfield their safety. 386 Bloomington residents residents. learned Anytime CPR and > Identified top 10 how to use AEDs to help > Public Health Nurses community health improve the chances that visited and counseled 695 priorities. anyone suffering a sudden seniors to maintain good cardiac arrest will have the health. > 97% of at -risk families that best possible chance for we helped were able to survival. > Nearly two-thirds of our maintain or improve their budget, $2,915,765, home environments in > Trained 70 Bloomington went to work for healthy order to raise children in a Fire Fighters, Parish communities. safe and healthy way. Nurses, Community Emergency Response Team > Made optimal, long -term > Improved the health status members and Police mental and physical health of 244 seniors and reduced Chaplains to teach CPR to possible for 67 at -risk their risk factors so they community members. families through Healthy may live safely and Families America home- independently in their Vaccinated 4,488 people visiting services. homes. for seasonal flu. i Worked with Normandale Community College on their tobacco -free campus RESULTS 2013 policy. 18 Emergency Preparedness and Response efforts improve the City's capacity for responding to any health emergency and increase community preparedness. We build relationships with community partners, including police, fire, emergency management, faith- and community -based organizations and others. 19 PREPARING FOR AND RESPONDING TO DISASTERS INCREASED COMMUNITY PREPAREDNESS • Conducted toolkitworkshop for22 faith -based organizations. • Conducted CPR (cardio pulmonary resuscitation) and AED (automated external defibrillator) training for Parish Nurses and Police Chaplains. • Participated in Operation Curtain Call, which exercised mass fatality response plans for a family assistance center. • Presented General Emergency Preparedness and Heat Plan to Richfield and Bloomington Advisory Boards of Health. • Conducted Cribbing Training for 14 Bloomington and Richfield CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) members. Cribbing is used to move and stabilize debris. • Conducted Animal Response Training for 15 Bloomington CERT members. • Participated in a FEMA Mass Casualty Virtual Tabletop Exercise. • Participated in a two -day Joint Counterterrorism Awareness Workshop designed to improve the ability of local jurisdictions to prepare for, protect against and respond to complex terrorist attacks. • Conducted Closed Point of Dispensing Planning with a senior residence. Residents developed a plan to distribute antibiotics within their complex in the event of an anthrax attack. • Participated in Local Technical Assistance Review with Minnesota Department of Health. This review evaluates our plans to respond to a widespread anthrax exposure. INCREASED CITY'S CAPACITYTO RESPOND • Conducted CERT basic training for 37 individuals. Trained 70 Bloomington Fire Fighters, Parish Nurses, Community Emergency Response Team members and Police Chaplains to teach CPR to community members requesting training. 386 residents of Bloomington learned Anytime CPR and how to use AEDs to help improve the chances that anyone suffering a sudden cardiac arrest will have the best possible chance for survival. These community volunteers have completed training in basic emergency response skills to become CERT members. They are prepared to save lives, prevent the spread of disease, and protect themselves, their families and their community in the event of a disaster. Bloomington Public Health conducted their training with assistance from emergency personnel. Family Health addresses health concerns and needs of infants, children, adolescents, mothers and families. Programs provide intensive home visiting for parental support, child development monitoring, health and safety consultation services to childcare providers and outreach to families at risk for poor childhood outcomes. . Bloomington is one of five local public health agencies to offer a grant- funded, home - visiting program that reduces asthma triggers forfamilies living in Section 8 housing. Pictured above, Pat, a Public Health Nurse prepares to give education and resources to children in their homes so they can have better health and better school attendance. 21 IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF FAMILIES 2013 SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES • HEAD START #screenings Child health and developmental screening. • SOUTH EDUCATION CENTER ALTERNATIVE On -site school visits with families and monthly childcare consultations. • FAMILY LITERACY ACADEMY Nurses teach immigrant families how to navigate systems such as # i healthcare, schools and community resources. # visits CHILD CARE CENTER /CONSULTATIONS # visits/ Monthly health and safety consultations with daycare center staff and #centers directors. HELP ME GROW SOUTH HENNEPIN Families with concerns about their children's (age 0 -3 years) #referrals/ development can access resources for help. Nurses assist families # visits through the process. FOLLOW -ALONG PROGRAM Helps parents know if their children's (age 0 -3 years) development #children (playing, talking, laughing, moving, growing) is age- appropriate through enrolled periodic questionnaires. VISITS TO FAMILIES • PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE HOME VISITS #clients/ Visits made for pregnancy, post -partum and newborn care, child # visits development, parenting concerns and help with community resources. • INTENSIVE PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE HOME VISITS #clients/ Visits to at -risk families, post -partum and newborn care. #visits • BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOLLOW -UP Information provided to families with new babies. Invited to enroll in #newborns Follow -Along Program. Home visits offered. • COMMUNITY RESOURCE SPECIALIST #phoneand Bilingual, Spanish- speaking staff provide resources to families. home visits FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAM #reports Nurses review police reports to assure families and individuals are linked reviewed with needed resources and healthcare. Program funded by United Way. 22 Services Vulnerable Adults and Seniors strives to improve the health status of seniors and reduce risk factors for vulnerab'l'e adults. Services to accomplish this include one -on -one consultations with a Public Health Nurse, hearing screenings and high -risk home assessments. The home assessments are for mental health, functional needs, safety and other concerns. 123] IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF SENIORS 2013 TALK WITH THE NURSE Clinics held at community locations provide one -on -one consultation with a Public Health Nurse. "Talks" include issues #clients/ such as blood pressure, healthy living tips, medication review, #visits safety, active aging, community resources and staying independent. HIGH -RISK HOME ASSESSMENT Public Health Nurses assess physical, psychosocial, and #clients/ environmental risk factors and provide referrals, consultation, # visits education and advocacy forvulnerable seniors. HEARING SCREENINGS FOR SENIORS Public Health Nurses offer hearing screening for seniors in #screenings conjunction with blood pressure checks. 24 Public Health Nurse, Bruce, checks a woman's blood pressure at a Talk With The Nurse clinic. He also discusses health topics that are important to seniors. These monthly clinics are held at several locations in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. WIC The WIC Program provides nutrition education and food vouchers for income - eligible pregnant and breastfeeding women, infants and children. This promotes healthier pregnancies and babies. WIC clients made 33,650 visits in 2013. Overweight Children in WIC The WIC program provides early intervention in the eating habits of low- income pre- school children. Recent changes in the WIC program includes a voucherforthe purchase of fresh fruits and vegetables. I 5687 afla 31% 5 513 30% 4992 X27% 4781 27% 4555 ;29% I 73% 4 5j6 Q �w oo�s 7490 74% 75% 77% 427 412 I 410 Breastfeeding in WIC WIC promotes and supports breastfeeding to boost children's and mothers' health and to reduce healthcare costs. Every $1 WIC spends on pregnant women in Minnesota saves $4.21 in Medicaid costs for newborns and their mothers. The average savings per prenatal participant is $636. Children 0 -3 Years Early Intervention Services Public Health Nurses assess behavioral, growth and developmental concerns and help parents access educational, medical and social service resources as soon as the problem is identified. This is a joint collaboration with Bloomington, Edina, Richfield and Eden Prairie school districts. Increased access to services helps these children be more ready for school. Flu Shots The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now recommends most people get flu shots. More seasonal flu shots were given in 2013 than in the previous four years. Immunizations Public Health provi'd'es a safety net for those without insurance Who need immunizations to protect them from diseases such as pertussi's, tetanus, diphtheria, measles, mumps and rubella. Access to low-cost immuniza- tions 'helps prevent the spread of infectious disease. Women 40+ Health Screening In 2013, 18 of our 1139 clients were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 250 needed further diagnostic testing and follow -up. Staff helped these uninsured and underinsured women find medical and financial resources for theirtreatment. Vulnerable Adults and Seniors Public Health Nurses make home visits and provide consultation to adults that have health and safety issues. Our goal is to increase their knowledge and use of resources so they can live more safely at home. Safety has improved among 79% of clients receiving follow -up services. Accreditation What is Public Health Accreditation? Public Health Accreditation is the measurement of a health department's performance against a set of nationally recognized, practice- focused and evidence -based standards. The goal is to protect and improve the health of the public by advancing the quality and performance of the health department. The accreditation process is an opportunity for Bloomington Public Health to identify successes and opportunities for improvement. It is designed to help focus work on common goals and continually evaluate performance to ensure its work has the greatest impact. Accreditation will also help the agency: • Respond to change • Have shared decision - making Implement workforce development Evaluate services and programs • Increase performance improvement • Develop strong partnership What are the benefits of accreditation? Engaging in accreditation catalyzes quality and performance improvement within all public health programs and can help health departments be better prepared to proactively respond to emerging and reemerging health challenges. Achieving national accreditation will give the Division: • National recognition for public health practice • Opportunity to engage the public health workforce Access to network of public health experts Focus on improving the health department • Potential access to new funding streams Potential streamlining of grant reporting 29 The Application, Process As a prerequisite to the application for accreditation, the Division needed to complete three documents: Community Health Assessment, Community Health Improvement Plan and a Strategic Plan. These documents lay the groundwork for the health department programs, policies; and interventions and the remainder of the-review for accreditation.; Bloomington Public Health completed its Strategic Plan in 2013 and applied for accreditation early in 2014. Strategic Plan 2013 -2018 Goals 1. Strengthen efficient and effective day -to -day operations. 2. Ensure a competent workforce that has the capacity to accomplish the Division's mission. 3. .Improve systems to demonstrate and.measure outcomes. 4.- Increase the Division's ability to effectively engage the community. 5. Ensure sustainable, adequate public health funding. Next Steps An application is just the beginning of this process. To achieve national accreditation, an agency must provide documented evidence that it adheres to national standards. These standards address the ten essential public health services, as well as management; administration and governance. - Bloomington Public Health will be workingto gatherthis evidence overthe next year. 30 The Advisory Boards of Health for Bloomington and Richfield and the Community Health Commission of Edina are appointed by their City Councils to study issues affecting the health of residents and to make recommendations to the City Council. Alice Chu Gregory Harms Nicholas Kelley Allyson Schlichte David Drummond Michael Harristhal Cindy McKenzie 2013 Highlights • Presented six Food Safety Awards recognizing commitmentto excellence in the food safety area. • Participated in a Joint Meetingwith Richfield and Edina and reviewed Community Health Assessment data. • Identified and prioritized Bloomington's top 10 community health issues. • Received regular updates on the Statewide Health Improvement Program and Community Transformation Grant. • Learned about the heat response plan, including mapping of vulnerable populations. • Reviewed trend data and case studies of public health nuisances from 2009 to 2013 and discussed how City staff from environmental health, public health and human services work together to provide services. • Supported the application for accreditation and received regular updates on the completion of the prerequisites. • Reviewed the goals and strategies of the Division's Strategic Plan. U Edina Community Health Commission Kumar Belani Kristen Connor Jan Johnson Nadia Martyn Joel Stegner Tone Deinema, student Melinda Bothun -Hurley Matt Doscotch MaryJo Kingston Alison Pence Aditya Mittal, student 2013 Highlights • Participated in a Joint Meetingwith Bloomington and Richfield and reviewed Community Health Assessment data. • Revised CHC mission statement to align with statutory duties of Edina Community Health Board (City Council). • Proposed edits to City of Edina Mission and Vision to include language relating to Health throughout each statement. • Proposed a "Health in all Policies" approach to Citywide decision - making. • Received updates on Public Health and Emergency Preparedness Service contract between BPH and City of Edina. • First season of Edina Community Garden completed, plots were completely sold out. (Waiting list in 2014) • Developed top 10 Health Priorities for the Edina Community Health Board as required by Minnesota Statute. • Initiated updates to CHC /Health webpage to provide better information to residents. (Ongoing project) • Began evaluation of City's regulation of Electronic Cigarettes, as directed by Edina City Council. Richfield Advisory Board of Health Callmie Dennis Nicholas Eyvindsson Kirsten Johnson Kristine Klos Chris Olson MattTietje Tiffany Egan Betty Gustafson RoseJost Derek Mattson Erin Rykken Jennifer Turrentine 2013 Highlights • Participated in the presentation of the 2013 Food Safety Awards by presenting them with certificates and plaques at a City Council meeting. • Participated in a Joint Meeting with Bloomington and Edina and reviewed Community Health Assessment data. • Identified and prioritized Richfield's top 10 community health issues. • Continued to support and participate in the Richfield Public Schools Community Wellness Expo. • Continued to participate in the Open Streets at Penn Fest event. • Continued to have an active representative on the Bike Task Force with a member who regularly attended a variety of bike related meetings. • Continued on -going participation in Tri-City Partners, SHIP, Yellow Ribbon Campaign and the State Community Health Services Advisory Committee by regularly attending meetings and participating in sub group meetings as needed. 32 2413 Financials Total Revenue $4,5259258 State and Federal Grants $2,292,821(51 %) City of Bloomington $699,200 (15 %) Edina and Richfield Contracts - $470,928(10%) Emergency Preparedness ® $257,370(6 %) Local Public Health Grant ® $252,766(6 %) FeesforServices ® $234,458 (5 %) IrsuranceReimbusements ® $191,674(4 %) Foundation and Other Grants' $126,041(3 %) $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1, 500, 000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,06. *Includes Greater Twin Cities United Way, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota Foundation and Ware Fund Total Expenses $4,5259258 Healthy Comm unities $2,915,765 (64%) Quality and Accessibilityof Health Services $684,471(15 %) Infrastructure ® $481,368 (11 %) Emergency Preparedness = $257,370 (6 %) Infectious Diseases r $186,284 (4 1%) $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 33 2013 Staffing Distribution of Employees 61 Staff • Full -Time Positions = 27 people 44% • Part -Time Staff = 34 people 42 Full -Time Equivalents Public Health Division Employees i Administrator 1 Assistant Administrator 3 Program Managers i Health Activity Supervisor 17 Public Health Nurses i Registered Nurse 3 Nurse Practitioners 6 Dietitians 8 Health Promotion Specialists i Speech /Language Pathologist Contracted Health Professionals 2 Physicians 34 56% 2 Translators /Community Resource Specialists i Communications & Health Promotion Specialist i Public Health Planner i Accountant 1 Account Clerk 1 Office Supervisor 1 Office Support Specialist 3 Office Assistants 8 Peer Breastfeeding Counselors Who we are Our agency originated in 1948 to provide school nursing services. In 1960 we were established as a community - based public health division for the City of Bloomington. Since that time we have been providing health services and programs for Bloomington residents and employees. Beginning in 1977, our services have been contracted by the cities of Richfield and Edina. Mission TO PROMOTE, PROTECT and IMPROVE the health of our community Community Impact Policies and programs are in place that protect and promote the community's health Women have healthier pregnancies and babies Children are ready for school Disabled and older adults live more safely and longer in their homes Decrease in obesity Prevention and control of infectious diseases Increased community safety Bloomington Public Health • 1900 W. Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, MN 55431 (952) 563 -8900 - V /TTY 952-563-8900. www.BloomingtonMN.gov 1 Edina YOUTH HEALTH UPDATE 2013 - 2014 7 i i� _ I ALCOHOL • MARIJUANA • PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & NUTRITION • TOBACCO • TEEN PREGNANCY PREVENTION This YOUTH HEALTH UPDATE presents data from the Minnesota Student Survey for Edina students. Learn what you can do to support the health of Edina youth and what you can do to help youth avoid behaviors harmful to their health. TOP 11 THINGS PARENTS AND OTHER ADULTS CAN DO 1. Role model the behavior you expect from your teen. 2. Be involved in your teen's life. 3. Show your interest by asking questions that need a response other than "yes" or "no" and then listen. 4. Get to know your teen's friends. 5. Set clear expectations and rules concerning alcohol use, other substance use and other unhealthy, risky behavior. 6. Follow through with consequences if rules and expectations are broken. 7. Be active and live a healthy lifestyle. Invite your children to walk, bike, or do other activities with you. 8. Be your teen's excuse not to break the rules. "My parents would be so angry if I ..." 9. Eat together as a family at least 2 -3 times a week. 10. Make it easy for teens to choose healthy foods at home and at school. 11. Let teens know when you think they've done well. Youth Health Updates are a publication of Bloomington Public Health. Information in the publication includes data from the 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2013 Minnesota Student Surveys. Data from 1995, 1998 and 2001 is available upon request. One question sometimes raised about student surveys is whether students' responses are honest and accurate. Researchers use a variety of data analysis techniques to examine the accuracy of anonymous surveys and these were applied to the student survey as well. Additionally, results are consistent over time with State and National trends. More information: 952 - 563 -8900 or www.bloomingtommn.gov/ Bloomington Public Health 1900 W. Old Shakopee Road - Bloomington, MN 55431 952 - 563 -8900 ! Tri -city C, Cd "71 CITY OF Public.."Health L bbomingtun\ �°�°'°""tl�' BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA The Minnesota Student Survey (MSS) is administered every three years. Previous surveys have been administered to 6th, 9th, and 12th graders across the state. In 2013, the survey was given to 5th, 8th, 9th and 11th graders. Student participation is voluntary. Ninth -grade data is used to monitor trends because these students historically have a high response rate and have been surveyed consistently across all years. Survey results provide information about youth assets and risk behaviors. Data can be used as a tool for initiating & continuing conversations about youth health. ALCOHOL USE* continued Alcohol Use Last 30 Days Edina 9th Grade 50% Alcohol use among Edina 9th Male -�- Female graders has decreased overall 40% 32.6% since 1998, with 11.6% of males ? 30% 25.3% 0 27.0% and 7.4% of females reporting w 24.7 /o past 30 day use in 2013. 20% 29.4% 11.60% m ° 11.0% *The question format changed slightly from a 10% 14.8% 12 8% 16.4% 7 9 7.40% 2004 to 2007. There is no data for 1992. ° 0% 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 TOBACCO USE Cigarette use is at its lowest point Cigarette Use Last 30 Days Edina 9th Grade for 9th grade females at 0.7 %, 50% compared to 4.6% of 9th grade 40% 34.0% Male --W- Female males reporting smoking in the past 30.0% 30 days in 2013. w ° 30% 34.0% 27.0% 17.0% 24.0 °0 14.0% 9.0% 0 10% �12.7 30 4° ° 0 9 /o �460% N a. 0% .0 0 70% 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 MARIJUANA USE 50% Marijuana Use Last 12 Months Edina 9th Grade 40% Male f Female Marijuana use has remained steady overtime among 9th 30 °i° 27.5% 27.2% 0 graders, with consistently lower ; °�0 21 ° 19 5% 18.1 ° / 22% rates among females compared y 20 13. 0 14.0 / to males. 0 10% 18. 13.5 0 5.3% 8.4% 10.8% 6.8% 6.20/( 6% ` 0% CL 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 continued SEXUAL ACTIVITY Among Edina 9th graders, the gap in the overweight and obesity rate between males and females has been narrowing, with a decline in male overweight and obesity and an increase in the rate among females between 2007 and 2013. HEALTHY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT 50% r c d D N 0 25% d L ! a 0%- Overweight or Obese by BMI Edina 9th Grade - * Male --m Female 23.2% 2.0% 16.80% 6.5% /0 9.10% 2007 2010 2013 Parental Connectedness Edina 9th Grade Sexual Activity Edina 9th Grade Among Edina 9th graders, males 50% report having ever had sex about feel they can talk to both of their Male -�- Female 10% more than females, Rates from a °�0 increasing since 1992. In 2013, males have declined about 10% w approximately 70 to 75% of 9th H since 1992 and fluctuated for H o 25% 23.9% 20.8% females. c 62.6% 59.6% 63.1 % 63.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17.0% v 13.5% 12.5% 47.2% 25% CL 12.301 7.0% 11.0% ° 6.5% 8.1 % 7.4% 0 4 / 4.3 0 2.30 /o 0% 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 NUTRITION & WEIGHT STATUS Milk Consumption Yesterday Edina 9th Grade 75% Male Female N Consistently, a greater proportion of d 9th grade males report consuming 50% 50% 46% three or more drinks of milk U) 43% % 40% 11111 yesterday than 9th grade females. w w ID 25% r o 2 26% �24% 23% 25% CL 0% 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Among Edina 9th graders, the gap in the overweight and obesity rate between males and females has been narrowing, with a decline in male overweight and obesity and an increase in the rate among females between 2007 and 2013. HEALTHY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT 50% r c d D N 0 25% d L ! a 0%- Overweight or Obese by BMI Edina 9th Grade - * Male --m Female 23.2% 2.0% 16.80% 6.5% /0 9.10% 2007 2010 2013 Parental Connectedness Edina 9th Grade The proportion of 9th graders who 100% t Male m Female feel they can talk to both of their parents about problems has been °�0 increasing since 1992. In 2013, '40 75% 0 75.6 75.6% 67.7% 68.1% 72.0% approximately 70 to 75% of 9th H 65.2% graders felt this way about their o 60 9% ° 52.4% 71.9 /0 70 2% connectedness t0 their parents. 50% 62.6% 59.6% 63.1 % 63.5% 53.2% a 47.2% 25% 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 EDINA YOUTH HEALTH UPDATE 2013 - 2014 ALCOHOL • MARIJUANA • PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & NUTRITION • TOBACCO - TEEN PREGNANCY PREVENTION M Had any alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, wine coolers, or liquor) in the last 30 18% 22% 9% 10% days. ** Binge drinking (5 or more drinks in a row) in the past month. - - - 3% Marijuana & Used marijuana in the last 30 days. ** 7% 11% 6% 12% Other Drugs During the last 30 days, on how many days have other students at school of- _ _ ° fered, sold, or given you an illegal drug? (answered at least one day) 12 /° .. • Smoked cigarettes in the last 30 days. 6% 9% 4% 3% Can talk to your mother about your problems most or some of the time? 83% 85% 88% 88% Can talk to your father about your problems most or some of the time? 70% 72% 79% 78% • • • Teachers are interested in students as people (answered "strongly agree" or o "agree ") 77 /o Students reporting they feel adults in the community care about them "quite a 37% 50% 56% 53% bit" or "very much." Physical Active 5 or more days of last week for 60 minutes a day (vigorous activity). - - - 44% Activity Spends more than 2 hours watching TV, DVDs, or videos on a phone, TV or - _ 19% computer on a typical school day. Ate fruit 2 or more times per day in the past 7 days. - - 42% Ate vegetables 2 or more times per day in the past 7 days. - - 31% Had no milk yesterday (girls only). 26% 23% 30% 22% Weight Status: Overweight or Obese (BMI) - - - 13% How would you describe your weight ?: Overweight - - - 12% Have you ever had sexual intercourse („had sex ")? (answered "yes') ** 11% 10% 10% 7% Has a parent or other adult in your household ever hit, beat, kicked or physically 7% 7% 5% 9% hurt you in any way? (Answered "Yes ") • During the last 30 days, how often have other students at school pushed, - - - 9% shoved, slapped, hit or kicked you when they weren't kidding around? (— 1 day) During the last 30 days, how often have other students at school excluded you _ _ 22% from friends, other students or activities? (answered at least once a week). • During the last 30 days, how many times at school have YOU excluded you from - _ _ 17% friends, other students or activities? (answered at least once a week). Students who think their parents would feel it would be "wrong" or "very wrong" 98% 97% for them to smoke cigarettes. Students who think their parents would feel it would be "wrong" or "very wrong" 97% 95% Parental for them to have one or more drinks of alcohol nearly every day. Disapproval Students who think their parents would feel it would be "wrong" or "very wrong" ° o for them to smoke marijuana. 98 /0 94 /o Students who think their parents would feel it would be "wrong" or "very wrong" - 97% for them use prescription drugs not prescribed for them. Students who think there is great risk or moderate risk if they smoke one or _ 92% 95% 92% more packs of cigarettes per day. • • • Students who think there is great risk or moderate risk if they have five or more - 0 0 drinks of an alcoholic beverage once or twice a week. - 84 /0 91 /0 85 /o Students who think there is great risk or moderate risk if they smoke marijuana _ 79% 82% 69% once or twice a week. * Minnesota Student Survey, 2004 -2013 Text for question or response option may vary between years EDINA YOUTH HEALTH UPDATE 2013 - 2014 7State data does not contain Minneapolis School District