Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-12-02_COUNCIL MEETING
VI REVIS DE DE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY DECEMBER 2, 2014 7:00 P.:M, I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed . on the consent agenda are considered routine: and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no .separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In.'such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes - Regular Meeting Of November 18, 2014, Work Session Of November I8, 2014 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 11/20/2014. TOTAL $1,035,147.04 And Per Pre -List Dated 11 /27/2104 TOTAL $2,518,169.45 C. Resolution No. 2014 -147 Approving Ambulance. & Miscellaneous Fire Fees For 2015 D. Resolution No. 2014 -148 Approving 2015 Park And Recreation Fees E. Resolution No. 2014 -149 Approving Deferral Of Special Assessments F. Schedule Public Hearing (12/16/2014) To Consider Application For Transfer Of,The Cable System From Comcast Of Minnesota, Inc. To Midwest Cable, Inc. G. Revised 2015 Council Meeting Dates, Board And Commission Meeting Dates And Dates of Religious Observance H. Request For Purchase: Authorize Non - Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Services 1. Resolution No. 2014 -154 Approving Minnesota Department of Health Community Health Board Grant Project Agreement J. 2015 Human Services Task Force Recommendation K. 2015 -2016 Union Contract For I.A.F.F. Local 1275: Paramedics /Firefighters V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation Declaring December 13th Edina Robotics Day Agenda/Edina City Council Dec. 2, 2014 Page 2 0 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor,will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a.public hearing speakers must observe the, following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance,_ the use of signs, clapping cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Review of 2015 Operating Budget— (Hold Hearing) B. PUBLIC HEARING — 2015 Building Fees & Liquor License Fees, Ordinance No. 2014 -21 Amending Section 2 -724 Schedule A Setting Fees For. 2015 (First Reading: ,Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendments For Building Height, Density And Floor Area Ratio; Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC, Resolution No. 2014 -150 and Resolution No. 2014 -151 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass. Preliminary Rezoning requires favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass.) D. PUBLIC HEARING — Final Development Plan And Final Rezoning To PUD -3 Zoning District, 6500 France Avenue, Aurora Investments, LLC, Resolution No. 2014 -152 and Ordinance No. 2014 -24 ( Final Development Plan& Rezoning Ordinance Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are I elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the. Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2014 -153. Sidewalk Facilities Map Amendment (Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Select Date For City Council 2015 Boards And Commission Annual Meeting :1 Agenda/Edina City Council Dec. 2, 2014 Page 3 C. Select Date For 2015 Volunteer Recognition Reception D. Resolution No. 2014 -155 Accepting Various Grants & Donations E. Ordinance No. 2014 -22 Amending Chapters 4 & 24 Concerning Alcoholic Beverages And Conduct In Parks, Streets, Sidewalks and Publicly Owned Property (First Reading. Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) F. Ordinance No. 2014 -23 Amending Chapter 18 Concerning False Alarms (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes I. Energy & Environment Commission, October 9, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT Tues Tues Sat Tues Tues Tues Wed Thur Wed Thur Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council Dec. 2, 2014 ' Page 4 AGENDA. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA — November 3, 2014 V. ,AUTHORIZE EXTENSION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT — 3944 WEST 49 -1/2 STREET VI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Dec 2 Work Session —Vision Edina Update 5:30 P.M. Dec 2 Regular Meeting 7:60 P.M. Dec 6 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 — Noon Dec 9 Special Meeting— Public Improvements Hearing 6:00 P.M. Dec 16 Work Session — Boards & Commissions Work Plans 5:30 P.M. Park Strategic Plan Input 6:00 P.M. Dec 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Dec 25 CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Jan I NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Jan 6 Work. Session — Promenade Plan 5:00 P.M. Legislative Agenda 5:30 P.M. Jan 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Jan 19 REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Jan 20 Work Session —Vision Edina 5:30 P.M. Jan 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Feb 3 Work Session —joint Session With, Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. Feb 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Feb 16 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Feb 17 Work Session —joint Meeting W/ Planning Commission & Two -Step 5:00 P.M. Redevelopment Process Feb 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mar 3 Work Session — Private Sanitary Sewer 5:00 P.M. State of Utilities 6:00 P.M. Mar 3 Regular Meeting 7.00 P.M. Mar 17 Work Session — Park Strategic Plan Progress Report 5:00 P.M. Ethics 6:00 P.M. Mar 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS SENIOR CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS CK �1 Y I L 1 i P► I � i 7 L d �I r COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS i 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CI -MHALL NOVEMBER 18, 2014 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called'the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Member Sprague.' 111: MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett; Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member` Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.E. Resolution No. 2014 -140 Establishing Limited Clean -up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back -ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers; IV.F. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): K -9 Retirement Program; IV.K. Traffic_Safety Committee Report, October I, 2014; IV.N. Resolution No. 2014 -146 Supporting'a Metro Transit CMAQ Application; IV.O. Restaurant Lease Agreement, SNP Enterprises, LLC, (Tin Fish) Braemar Golf Course; and, IV.P. Request for Purchase, Architectural Services, Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Braemar Clubhouse, as follows: IV.A. .Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of November 3, 2014 and Canvass of Election Returns IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 6, 2014, and consisting. of. 25 pages; General Fund $186,309.26; Police Special Revenue $1,318.32; _Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $12.90; Working Capital Fund $71,484.17; Art Center Fund $1,353.58; Golf Dome Fund $1-,026.68; Aquatic Centerfund $8,337.00; Golf Course Fund $2,206.62; Ice Arena Fund $1,078,522.11; Sports Dome Fund $771,90.1.56; Edinborough Park Fund $785.92; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $239.00; Liquor Fund $114,610.16; Utility Fund $31,610.16; Storm Sewer Fund $3,757.70; PSTF Agency Fund $32,801.05; TOTAL ,$2,306,267.15 and for receipt of payment' of claims dated November 13, 201,4, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $171,941.07; Police Special Revenue $120.81; Braemar Memorial Fund $17,000.00; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $1,237.81; Working Capital Fund $156,115.26; Equipment Replacement Fund $13,933.75; Art Center Fund $15,526.17; Golf Dome Fund $3,885.00; Aquatic Center Fund $627.86; Golf Course Fund $28,672.37; Ice Arena Fund $977.67; Edinborough Park Fund $9,970.92; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,814.25; Liquor': Fund $335,353:18; Utility Fund $415,078.06; Storm Sewer Fund $1,039.21; PSTF - Agency Fund $2,269.67; Grandview TIF District $194.43; TOTAL $1,180.182.49; and, Credit Card Transactions dated August 26 — September 25, 2014; TOTAL $43.090:62 IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -138, adopting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Allow Additional Housing in the Regional Medical District IV.D. Grant Second Reading 'and Adopt g Ordinance No.. 2014-17 and a Resolution No. 2014 -139, approving Final Rezoning from POD -1 to PUD' and Ordinance Amendment Establishing the PUD District, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative,' 3330 66th Street IV.E. Resolution No. 2014 140, establishing Limited Cleiin up and- Property DaMage Protection for Sewer Back ups and Water Main Breaks her Water and Sewer Customers IV.F. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 18, 2014 IV.G. Request for Purchase, Public Safety, Radios, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Motorola Solutions at $223,245.75 IV.H. Adopt. Resolution No. 201+14 I,, Requesting an Advance from Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Fund IV.1. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -142, Requesting Variance from Standards for State Aid Operation .for Valley View Road 'at Comanche Court IV.J. Adopt Resolution'' No.,- 2014 -143, Receiving Engineering Studies for. 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstructign Project IV.K: , Cieteber 1, 2014 IV.L. Request for Purchase, Replace HVAC Units at Centennial Lakes Park, awarding:. the: bid to the recommended low bidder, Owens Companies at $24,180.00 IV.M. Request for Purchase. One Ford F -350 4 -Wheel Drive Vehicle with Plow, awarding the bid to the recommended, bidder, Midway Ford Commercial and.. Government Sales at $32,491.00 IV.N. , Supp6rting a. Metre Transit GMAQ Application ._.-, SNP C- to ..r .:°-s, ---, (Tin Fish) Rraemar CnJf leu ... IV.O. R. ;arant! - --- IV.P. Regt+est for Purthase, - /4iach+teEtaral Se" ices, SPerides- Relners -4 r4bFteets, �Br-aeMa lease IV.Q. Approve Donations, Sponsorship, and Advertising Policy Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson; Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -140 ESTABLISHING LIMITED CLEAN -UP AND PROPERTY DAMAGE PROTECTION FOR SEWER' BACK-UPS AND WATER MAIN BREAKS FOR WATER AND SEWER CUSTOMERS ADOPTED The Council shared that the, plan protected against no fault sewer back -ups with a limit of $40,000.00 per household; however, the plan did not offer protection in some circumstances such as extraordinary weather events. The Council suggested revisiting this topic in order to discuss a back -up plan that would cover regardless of circumstances. Mayor Hovland introduced ,and moved_ adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -140, establishing Limited Clean Up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back -ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: ,Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried: IV.F. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING: K-9 RETIREMENT PROGRAM -ADOPTED The Council shared that the K -9 Retirement Program had been a project that the..Edina Crime Prevention Fund had been considering for some time. The fund maintained the K -9 unit during the service lifetime, but upon retirement, the animal I became' the .service .officer's pet. A donation was made to help the officers with the cost of the pets. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to adopt Memorandum of Understanding establishing a program for K -9 Units retired from active service from the Edina Police Department. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson; Hovland Motion carried. IVX TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT, OCTOBER 1, 2014 APPROVED The Council noted that a concerned parent had requested sidewalks along '59th Street, starting at Concord Avenue, for a safer walking route to school. Sidewalks were not possible at this time, but staff recommended restricting parking on one side of the road during school times to allow room for children to walk. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member' Bennett, to review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of October I, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson'; Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 a r� Minutes /Edina City Council /November 18, 2014 IV.N. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -146 SUPPORTING A METRO TRANSIT CMAQ APPLICATION - ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf expressed support for a CMAQ application for a grant to fund projects that addressed congestion mitigation and air quality. Metro Transit had volunteered to present an application for grant funding for a future park and ride, and was seeking a show of support from the City. Mr. Neuendorf answered questions of the Council, ind_ icating that approximately 55 to 90 in various places and ride the bus downtown. The number of . ..,. ets ,,. ted : ,.tee in the 2012 a,,.,.,l...... ent r...,..,,...,0Fl( based en what could r.« on that s: «.. The number of parking spots to be requested in the application was based on the 2012 Grandview Development Framework, with 200 spaces to be allocated to a park and ride. There was some flexibility, such as the City could choose to back away all together or the site could be moved if necessary, however Manager Neuendorf explained the grant application would include the address of the former Public Works site. He noted it could be difficult to change the location! Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution IN Supporting a Metro Transit CMAQ Application., Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.O. RESTAURANT LEASE AGREEMENT, SNP ENTERPRISES, LLC, (TIN FISH) BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE — APPROVED Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh shared the terms of the lease agreement and answered questions of the Council. Ms. Kattreh responded that Tin Fish would not continue operations at Lake Calhoun, that alcohol was currently being served on the golf course, and that scheduling events would be accomplished through City staff. The Council discussed the use of Wi -Fi for patron use versus business use and billing practices for telecommunication services. The Council asked why an RFP had not been used in this process. Ms. Kattreh answered that Tin Fish met and exceeded all the criteria and staff felt confident Tin Fish would be a successful operation. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve lease and authorize Mayor and City Manager to execute and implement the agreement. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.P. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE — APPROVED Ms. Kattreh shared the updates planned for several areas of the clubhouse including required kitchen renovations. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve the Request for Purchase, .Architectural Services, Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. at Braemar Clubhouse, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. at $49,000.00. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. OCTOBER SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — TOPIC. DOG PARKS Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of October opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to dog parks. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT Joycelyn Mellom, 4506 Arden Avenue, noted she had sent the Council a detailed letter concerning the total demolition of 4505 Arden Avenue on October 27, 2014, and belief that it was in opposition to Resolution No. 2014 -43. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council /November 18. 2014 Scott Busyn, '4615 Wooddale Avenue, stated he represented Great Neighborhood Homes and asked the Council to stop the harassment and defamation of himself and his client at 4505 Arden Avenue. Carol Hancock, 4503 Arden Avenue, supported Jocelyn Mellom and her statements. V11. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -144 AWARDING SALE OF $13,485,000 G.O. REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2014B —ADOPTED,' Finance Director Roggeman reported that the Council had called for a bond sale to re -fund four outstanding bond issues at the October 21, 2014 City Council meeting. Mark Ruff, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., shared that bids had been received earlier that day from eight bidders. The low bidder was Piper Jaffray at 0.87 %. The number of bids and low interest rate were due to the City's AAA credit rating. from Standard and Poor's and Moody's credit rating agencies. Mr. Ruff explained why the City had a high rating and talked.about the City's current debt. He also shared that the sale amount had changed from $13,485,000 to $12,720,000. The Council discussed the debt profile graph and noted that it was not indicative of what debt the City might obtain in the future. Member: Ben nett:introduced;andmoved adoption of Resolution No: 2014 -144, authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $12,720,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20146. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett,! Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. SURVEY RESULTS FROM 2013 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS —PRESENTED Engineer Millner reported that over the past few years the engineering department had conducted a survey of residents that were affected by the street reconstruction projects. Mr. Millner shared the results from the 2013 Street Reconstruction Projects survey noting an overall improvement on each question from the previous year. Mr. Millner answered a question from the Council, indicating that street lighting in neighborhoods was on t evaluated for lighting levell ty ��• - ^..� .a ^ ^a ' ^�'� ^a cu*d4i^ The Living Streets Plan would further look into streetlights. Mr. Millner updated the Council on a. resident in the Mendelssohn neighborhood on Belmore Lane, stating that the City would be completing restoration of the .front lawn with six inches of topsoil. VII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -18, AMENDING CHAPTER 36, REGARDING FRONT STREET SETBACK FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION FOR TEAR DOWN /REBUILDS; ELIMINATION OF MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM UNIT SIZE FOR MULTI - FAMILY APARTMENTS AND LIGHTING - ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague shared that the City Council had approved first reading of Ordinance No. 2014 -18 and tonight it was presented for second reading. It was noted the Council was considering adding an option of "average of the block" in addition to averaging or matching the homes on adjacent lots located on the same street. Mr. Teague presented the examples of "average of the block" front street setback calculations. The Council requested that staff add - illustrations to make it easier to understand. Attorney Knutson answered a question from the Council, indicating that ,existing lighting would be grandfathered in and not be impacted by the lighting limitation. However, Mr. Knutson indicated that if the level could be lowered by changing a bulb, it would be likely the City could respond to a complaint. The Council discussed the elimination of 'minimum and maximum unit size for multi - family apartments.. Kevin Staunton, Planning Commission Chair, answered the concerns of the Council, stating that minimum and maximum unit sizes were obsolete and not needed because the market changes over time. Member Swenson made.a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -18, amending Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 18,r 2014 Front Yard Setback Requirements and First Floor Elevation Regulations, for Tear Down Rebuilds, as modified to add the word "other" in Section 1. (I )a. I. and 2. in the last statement prior to dwelling units. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VII.D. ORDINANCE NO. 201449, AMENDING CHAPTERS 2 AND 24 CONCERNING PERMITS FOR MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES — ADOPTED Mr. Neuendorf reported that Ordinance No. 2014 -19 had been considered for First Reading by the Council and was before the Council tonight with recommended changes for Second Reading. The Council asked if there was a schedule of when to look at' the 50th and France public parking ramps to check on efficiency, pricing, and if parking was adequate so that the Council could make a decision'on what to do with other properties. Mr. Neuendorf answered that the way finding system to monitor the use of the parking facilities had been fully installed and would be giving data to assist in future decision making. Member Brindle made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -19, amending Chapters 2 and 24 of the Edina City Code Concerning Permits for Municipal Parking Facilities. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -20 AMENDING CHAPTERS 2 AND 28 CONCERNING UTILITIES — ADOPTED Public Works Director Olson reported that with the implementation -of the meter replacement project over the last several years Public Works had replaced 14,209 meters. Mr. Olson noted 19 remaining properties were nonresponsive to the City's attempts to gain entrance and replace the meter. He suggested a $50.00 per quarter surcharge as proposed in Ordinance 2014 -20 for any property where the meter had not been replaced. The Council discussed other options such as shutting off the water and requested Mr. Olson to return in six months to report on the 19 properties. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -20, Amending Chapters 2 and 28 of the Edina City Code concerning Sanitary Sewer and Water Utility. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.F. BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBER INTERVIEW DATES — SCHEDULED The Council selected dates to conduct interviews for Board and Commission Members on February 9, 10, and 12, 2015, at 5:00 p.m. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving Board and Commission Member interview dates. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.G. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -145 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -145 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. _ Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council /November 18.,-2014 VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE_ Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. PETITION REQUESTING SIDEWALK INSTALLATION BETWEEN S200 AND 5336 HALIFAX AVENUE VIII.C. PETITION REGARDING STREET RECONSTRUCTION INDIANOLA AND JUANITA AVENUES AND WEST SIST STREET:_ - RECEIVED Member Bennett :made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to receive the Petition requesting sidewalk installation between 5200 and 53336 Halifax Avenue and the Petition regarding street reconstruction Indianola and Juanita Avenues and West 51 st Street. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.-D. MINUTES. 1, EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 2 AND OCTOBER 7, 2014 2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, OCTOBER 14, 2014 3. PARK BOARD, OCTOBER 6, 2014 4. VETERAN'S MEMORIAL COMMITTEE, JUNE 20 AND AUGUST 29, 2014 5. PLANNING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 8, 2014 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XI.A. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: MLC LEGISLATIVE AGENDA AND JANUARY WORK SESSION XI.B. CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL MEETING XI.C. 2014 PERFORMANCE REVIEW X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9AS p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City. Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 2, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 18, 2014, meeting available. Page 6 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 18, 2014 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson entered the meeting at 5:15 p.m. Member Sprague was absent. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer; Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; . Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Dave Nelson, Police Chief; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director; Tom Schmitt, Fire Chief, Cary Teague, Community Development. Director; and Pat Wrase, Assistant City Engineer. Mayor Hovland said the meeting would focus on two topics. The first part of the meeting would be spent getting an update on the 2014 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan. The second part of the meeting would be spent reviewing and discussing a 2015 Human Services Task Force Budget recommendation. 201 S -2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the 2015 Capital Improvement process followed. He outlined the timeline followed pointing out the citizen engagement that took place during the summer and fall. Mr. Roggeman described the staff CIP prioritization process used to narrow down the projects submitted for inclusion in the 2015 -2019 CIP from the $157 million requested projects to the final projects presented for consideration by the City Council. Included in the discussion were the priorities citizens would .like in the CIP over the next five years, funding of CIP projects, types of projects such as streets, parks, sidewalks, trails, water and sewer infrastructure, and overall how to fund the proposed projects. 2015 HUMAN SERVICES TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Members of the Human Services Task Force attending included: Courtney Whited, Chair (Transportation Commission), Pat Arseneault (Human Rights & Relations Commission); Joyce Mellom (Heritage Preservation Board), Christina Wagner, Student, and Aanik Lohani, Student. Chair Whited with assistance from Task Force members presented the recommendation for the 2015 Human Services proposed budget of $86,300 to the following organizations: • The Bridge For Youth $6,500 • Conflict Resolution Center $2,000 • Cornerstone Advocacy Service $14,700 • Normandale Center for Healing & Wholeness $4,700 • Oasis For Youth $2,500 • Senior Community Services $19,200 • Store To Door $11,700 • VEAP $25,000 The Task Force and Council discussed the process and method used to determine the funding for each organization. The Council thanked the Task Force for their work on behalf of the City. The recommendation will be incorporated into the 2015 Operating.Budget. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 2, 2014 Debra Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKR2 LUGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/18/201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11120/2014- 11120/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 662 11/2012014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 58.80 357358 1841871 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 124.80 357359 1841988 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 102.40 357554 1843285 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 70.40 357466 1843286 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 356.40 663 11/20/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 112.78 COFFEE 357324 431573 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 64.60 COFFEE 357453 9750188 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 177.38 664 11120/2014 100638 BACHMAN'S 1,371.60 LANDSCAPE EDGING 00002319 357418 ORER295410/49 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 1,371.60 565 11/20/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 46.55 357363 45612700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 249.75 357361 6500200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ VERNON SELLING 90.41 357362 91049900 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 134.52 357560 91050000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 81.62 357360 91083300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 127.53 357364 91083500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 159.48 357562 91114300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 87.13 357561 91114400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 976.99 566 11120/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 253.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 357224 WO- 971948 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL,SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 71.51 PITCHERS 00002112 357327 WO- 971975 -1 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 55.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003097 357420 WO- 972633 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003097 357420 WO- 972633 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 461.18 567 11120/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 1,590.00 EDIN PARK DESIGN SERVICES 357328 0171231 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,590.00 568 11/2012014 104020 DALCO r 313.46 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001464. 357285 2813040 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 313.46 CITY OF EDINA 11/18/201410:12:25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 668 11/2012014 104020 DALCO Continued... 669 11/2012014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. i 3,241.10 357569 777424 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 121.80 357369 777777 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,003.45 357368 777778 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,570.30 357472 777779 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 70.70 357471 777780 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 348.00 357570 777850 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,355.35 670 11/2012014 129167 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 330.00 P -23 MAILING 357231 6530 -01 44012.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN P23 SOTH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 330.00 671 1112012014 100768 -- GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 2,235.20 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS - 357232 46166 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,235.20 672 11120120.14 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 160.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 357449 111314 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 10.99 REIMBURSEMENT 357546 111714 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 31.84 REIMBURSEMENT 357546 111714 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 40.99 REIMBURSEMENT 357546 111714 5820.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 50TH STREET GENERAL 244.54 673 11120/2014 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 673.45 SAND 357336 212034 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 673.45 674 11/20/2014 101792 LURE -TECH 136.00- USED OIL PICK UP 357431 541921 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,069.00 OIL 357430 544000 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 933.00 676 11/20/2014 112677 M.AMUNDSONLLP 757.10 357595 185264 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - 757.10 676 1112012014 103944 MED.COMPASS 28.00 HEARING TESTS 357434 24391 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/18uU1410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 676 1112012014 103944 MED COMPASS Continued... 84.00 . HEARING TESTS 357434 24391 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 56.00 HEARING TESTS 357434 24391 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 168.00 677 11/2012014 101483 MENARDS 66.82 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001811 357292 67547 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 74.36 NAILS, TAPE, CONCRETE BLOCKS 00001824 357629 67949 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 142.40 NAIL PULLER, LUMBER, NAILS 00001844 357630 68347 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.58 BLEACH, TAPE, LAMPS 00008008 357632 68434 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 53.87 SEALNAT, SEALANTS, 00001855 357631 68523 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 96.76 GLOVES, MALLET, TAPE MEASURE 00008010 357233 70766 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 68.63 FENCE PARTS, MOUSE KILLER 00006272 357337 71436 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 11.99 KNEEPADS 00001054 357293 71572 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 13.90 VFD FEED CHANGE 00001055 357294 71580 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 560.31 678 11120/2014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,129.60 NOZZLE HEADS 00006268 357340 990484 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE ' &GROUNDS 232.58 SPRAYER PARTS 00006269 357341 990627 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,362.18 679 11/2012014 129486 PAPCO INC. 80.54 ANTIBACTERIAL FOAM SOAP 357460 88888 -1 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 80.54 680 11120/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 416.14 SOAP, TISSUE, URINAL SCREENS 357237 7259 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 455.07 LINERS, WIPERS, TOWELS 357238 7344 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 791.33 LINERS, GLOVES, TISSUE 00002105 357345 7350 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 532.63 ICE MELT 00002321 357344 7353 5765.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 2,195.17 681 11/20/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 197.50 BUSINESS CARDS 357302 83731 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 197.50 682 11/20/2014 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 14.33- 357607 14 -14556 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 239.00 357606 14 -15420 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 224.67 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014 - 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 682 1112012014 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 683 11/2012014 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 928.03 DRAW LATCH ASSEMBLY, CYLINDEM0005837 357308 32789 1553.6530 928.03 684 1112012014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 44.74 KEYS 357440 35033 1553.6530 150.00 REMOVE DECALS 357438 661030 1553.6180 150.00 REMOVE DECALS 357439 661033 1553.6180 344.74 686 11/2012014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 37.40- CREDIT 357248 40215653 5520.5510 10.89- CREDIT 357249 40313629 5520.5510 1,020.16- CONCESSION PRODUCT 357247 40927856 5520.5510 971.87 686 11120/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 845.20 357399 376624 -00 5822.5513 102.00 357400 376983 -00 5862.5513 420.25 357509 377076 -00 5842.5513 2,112.75 357616 377220 -00 5862.5513 172.20 357614 377226 -00 5822.5513 72.00 357615 377392 -00 5862.5513 3,724.40 388430 11120/2014 123574 ABRAMS & SCHMIDT LLC 350.00 SUPERVISION CLASS FEE 357417 205 1400.6104 350.00 388431 11120/2014 106076 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 3,825.00 .WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00002320 357318 33911 5761.6230 3,825.00 388432 1112012014 388433- 11/20/2014 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 102.21 PEST CONTROL 357319 924693 5421.6102 28.00 BIO -DRAIN SERVICE 357320 927461 5421.6102 130.21 136196 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP Subledger Account Description Continued... REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 11118/201410:12:25 Page- 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS. 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK - SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/2012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388433 11120/2014 135196 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP Continued... 58.24 COBRA INVOICE -ABG 357516 24650 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 58.24 388434 11/2012014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 264.20 COFFEE 357321 155959 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 264.20 388436 11/20/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 416.86 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357322 411070619 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 384.45 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357323 411110091 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 803.31 388436 11/20/2014 133626 ARIZON COMPANIES 850.00 WINTER SERVICE 00006340 357325 0000007343 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 850.00. 388437 1112012014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,044.00 357556 3003457 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,212.20 357558 3004330 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,600.00 357469 3005329 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,700.00 357467 3005330 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,389.20 357557 3005331 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,278.50 357468 3005332 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 988.75 357555 3005333 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7.00- 357559 302122 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 13,205.65 388438 11120/2014 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 639.55 SAFETY INSPECTION, SAFETYCLIP 357282 10139471 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 639.55 388439 1112012014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 276.39 WASTE DISPOSAL 357454 110114 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 276.39 388440 11/20/2014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 18.48 BATTERIES 00003098 357419 018 - 355061 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 18.48 388441 11/2012014 118966 BCBS OF MN 11 /18i[01410:12:25 Page - 5 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014— 11/2012014 Check # Date . Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - 388441 11120/2014 118966 BCBS OF MN Continued... 1,229.39 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357446 GLENN SINGLETON 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES - 1,229.39 388442 11/2012014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 256.00 PIZZA 357281 D28IN2767 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 360.00 PIZZA 357326 D28IN2827 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 616.00 388443 11/20/2014 126139 BERNICK'S 171.60 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357222 173367 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 265.45 357470 176626 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 629.55 357365 176627 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 371.14 357563 176628 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,437.74 388444 11120/2014 100649 BEST BUY BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 1,379.60 TVS 00004424 357517 1734930 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,379.60 388446 1112012014 124634 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 243,040.16 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 357455 P -23- NO. 5 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 243,040.16 388446 11/2012014 134697 BLOOMINGTON ELECTRIC COMPANY 46,455.00 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 357421 P -23#3 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 46,455.00 388447 1112012014 126268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL- NOV 2014 357456 2170V 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 386.00 388448 11/2012014 136173 BONE, RICHARD S. 1,434.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357257 111114 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,434.00 388449 11/20/2014 119361 BOURGETIMPORTS 104.73 357566 122994 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 137.50 357366 123094 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 137.50 357564 123095 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 652.28 357565 123188 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 11/18/201410:12:25 Page - 6 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 50TH STREET RUBBISH FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1112012014 129923 CAWLEY . CITY OF EDINA 147.11 NAME BADGES 147.11 Council Check Register by GL 388456 11/20/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911 590.02 612 E01 -0426 11/2012014— 11/20/2014 104.93 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388449 11120/2014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 590.02 612 E12 -6797 Continued... 1,650.45 1,032.01 388466 11120/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 388460 11/2012014 9,174.50 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 9,174.50 388467 61.48 357518 111214 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 20.00 357518 111214 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 84.35 357518 111214 6421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 165.83 388451 1112012014 102929 CABINET CONCEPTS 3,441.92 WINE RACKS 2ND PAYMENT 357258 11129 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,441.92 388462 1112012014 100391 CALL ONE INC. 999.86 E911 DISPATCH EQUIPMENT 357259 535117 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 999.86 388463 11/20/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 11/18/20 1410:12:25 - Page- 7 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY E911 321.90 357568 445046 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2- 525 -07 357367 445047 5842 5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 388464 1112012014 129923 CAWLEY . 147.11 NAME BADGES 147.11 388456 11/20/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.93 612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911 590.02 612 E01 -0426 104.93 612 E23 -0652 GV911 59.28 952 835 -1161 207.27 952 835 -6661 590.02 612 E12 -6797 1,650.45 388466 11120/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 9,174.50 PHEP CONTRACT W /BPH 9,174.50 388467 1112012014 103040 CITY PAGES 357567 447886 357283 V255494 357260 0056 -11/14 357226 0426 -11/14 357261 0652 -11/14 357262 1161 -11/14 357263 6661 -11114 357225 6797 -11/14 357519 PH1213 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 2310.6406 1554.6188 2310.6406 5720.6188 1552.6188 1554.6188 4204.6103 GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE E911 CENT SERV GEN - MIS E911 EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SERV GEN MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11120/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388467 11/20/2014 103040 CITY PAGES Continued... 291.66 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 357264 D10077094 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.66 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 357264 D10077094 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 291.68 NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 357264 D10077094 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 875.00 388468 11120/2014 1,181.13 1,181.13 388469 1112012014 26,545.00 26,545.00 388460 11120/2014 - 9.03 29.01 24.83 62.87 388461 11120/2014 816.61 816.61 .816.63 1,531.41 3,981.26 388462 11/2012014 1,925.02 3,986.50 5,911.52 388463 11120/2014 20.48 238.05 258.53 388464 11/20/2014 136198 CLARK, HARLAN E UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 136187 COLDSPRING PAVERS FOR VETERANS MEMORIAL 120433 COMCAST 8772 10 614 0161120 8772 10 614 0220686 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT CABLE TV AND INTERNET CABLE TV AND INTERNET CABLE TV AND INTERNET ADVERTISING 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES BIRTHDAY T-SHIRTS BIRTHDAY T- SHIRTS 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 114 - 09855685 -4 114 - 10014090 -3 100700 CURTIS 1000 -MIDWEST 357544 409 KRESSE CIR 5900.2015 357422 764179 47073.6710 357227 161120 -10/14 5511.6105 357329 220686 -11/14 5710.6105 357284 23973 -11/14 1551.6103 357265 11 /14EDINALIQUO 5842.6122 R 357265 11 /14EDINALI000 5822.6122 R 357265 11 /14EDINALI000 5862.6122 R 357520 NW603309 5210.6122 357330 32983 357331 32985 357457 10/14 357266 103114 5720.5510 5720.5510 7411.6406 1400.6406 CUSTOMER REFUND EQUIPMENT, REPLACEMENT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/18/201410:12:25 Page - 8 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING . UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VETERANS MEMORIAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA. 11/18/201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11120/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388464 11/20/2014 100700 CURTIS 1000 -MIDWEST Continued... 1,063.26 PERMIT STICKERS 357228 4064869 4090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,063.26 388465 1112012014 135196 CV PTA 100.00 1/9/15 CANCELATION REFUND 357521 REFUND 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 100.00 388466 1112012014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 3,182.50 - EXHAUST FAN REPAIRS 357230 3026538 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 946.43 CO EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 357229 3027979 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER. ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 4,128.93 388467 11120/2014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 3,038.20 DEC 2014 STD PREMIUM 357522 F018342 -12/14 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,038.20 388468 '11120/2014 101766 DISPLAYSALES 2,232.00 FLAGS .357286 INV0098914 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 2,232.00 388469 11/2012014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 919.46 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 357523 160175 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 919.47 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 357523 160175 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 919.47 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 357523 160175 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,758.40 388470 11/20/2014 103694 EDINALARM INC. 343.07 PRO SHOP ALARM MONITORING 357333 92226 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 343.07 CLUBHOUSE ALARM MONITORING 357332 92231 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 1,189.13 INSTALLALARM SYSTEM 357524 92777 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,875.27 388471 11/2012014 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 107.07 REPLACEMENT LEGENDS SET 357268 AW110514 -4 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.00 SQUAD REPAIR 357267 RS4173 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 192.07 388472 11/20/2014 120351 ETC INSTITUTE 2,565.00 SURVEY- FINAL REPORT 357423 16521 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 2,565.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA - Council Check Register by. GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388472 11/20/2014 120361 "ETC INSTITUTE Continued... 388473 1112012014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 250.22 BATTERY 357426 1- Z02672 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 66.94 BATTERY 00006464 357334 69- 157155 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 222.86 BRAKE LINING KIT, ROTORS 357287 69- 157538 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 113.44 SWITCH 357425 69- 157679 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 74.97 BATTERY 357424 69- 157751 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 728.43 388474 11/2012014 i 130830 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP. 11,185.00 WARNING SYSTEM SIREN 00003850 357447 5668113 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 11,185.00 - 388476 11120/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 46.88 357448 103114 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 98.46 357448 103114 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 131.32 357448 103114 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 188.15 357448 103114 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 294.39 357448 103114 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 19.31 357448 103114 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 53.37 357448 103114 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 831.88 388476 11120/2014 130994 GALLOWAY, SUZ 75.71 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 357525 111114 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 447.48 WORKSHOP 357525 111114 5110.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 523.19 388477 11120/2014 134862 • GL SPORTS CAMPS LLC 1,156.60 MINI -HAWK CAMP 357545 20601 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,156.60 38.8478 11/20/2014 101103 GRAINGER 107.71 SUMP PUMP 00001993 357288 9583104956 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.87 SAFETY GLASSES 00005797, 357427 9585453617 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 126.58 388479 11/20/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC - 3,235.08 357571 173786 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 362.25 357572 174074 5822.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 11/18/201410:12:25 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check'Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014 — 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388479 11/20/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued... 3,597.33 388480 11120/2014 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 884.64 DEC 2014 COBRA 357527 53181397 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 11,836.19 DEC 2014 PREMIUM 357526 53181920 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 12,720.83 388481 11120/2014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 357289 .37034 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,475.08 388482 11/20/2014 136126 HERRING, ANN D. 957.32 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357269 111114 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 957.32 388483 1112012014 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 28.00 LAPTOP ACCESSORIES 00004419 357290 55053607 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,332.38 LAPTOP 60004419 357291 55062792 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,360.38 388484 11120/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,923.00 357573 731356 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 361.00 357574 732375 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 603.50 357474 732382 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,243.50 357370 732643 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 213.50 357473 732960 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS' SOLD BEER 5,344.50 388486 1112012014 102437 HOIGAARD'S CUSTOM CANVAS AND AWNINGS LLC ' 885.00 REPLACE OLD AWNINGS 357271 16308 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,612.50 WINDOWAWNINGS 357270 16309 5841.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 3,497.50 388486 1112012014 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 611.00 CARD PRINTER CONTRACT 357528 233904 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 611.00 388487 11120/2014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 270.00 357371 24286 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 558.00 357575 24333 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 11 /16/201410:12:25 Page - 11 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SERV GEN -MIS YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/18/201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc.No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388487 11/20/2014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY Continued... 828.00 388488 11/2012014 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 5.66 357627 10 /14 -UTIL 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 12.39 357627 10 /14 -UTIL 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 410.58 357627 10 /14 -UTIL 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 30.12 357627 10 /14 -UTIL 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 458.75 388489 11/20/2014 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 185.00 PARK POOL & TRACK PASSES 357335 66686 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 185.00 388490 11/20/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 100.00 URL SHORTCUT 357529 JJ5526 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 350.00. WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 357529 JJ5526 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 LIVING STREETS MODULE - 357529 JJ5526 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 100.00 URL SHORTCUT 357529 JJ5526 9235.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VALLEY VIEWMOODDALE TIF DIST 75.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 357450 JJ6536 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 357451 JJ5553 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,225.00 388491 11/20/2014 136188 JIMENEZ, JESUS 840.00 INTERPRETER SERVICES 357452 111314 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 840.00 388492 11/2012014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 39.00 357577 2276973 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,685.40 357576 2286655 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,759.43 357578 2286687 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING 2,230.55 357477 2286688 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER =; VERNON SELLING 109.60 357478 2286689 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,460.49 357475 2286693 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.35 357476 2286694 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 17,340.82 388493 11120/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 12.41- 357592 500136 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 29.13- 357591 500138 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 638.99 357587 5014884 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF tUINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 388493 11120/2014 100636 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,152.00 357583 5015349 5822.5513 905.80 357376 5019311 5822.5512 4,686.68 357580 5020343 5822.5513 2,023.59 357372 5020346 5822.5512 136.16 357373 5020347 5822.5512 995.57 357581 5020348 5822.5513 365.31 357374 5020349 5822.5512 1,940.88 357582 5020350 5822.5513 2,436.00 357486 5020351 5822.5513 1,123.66 357377 5020356 5822.5513 3,315.89 357375 5020357 5822.5512 1.07 357493 5025425 5862.5512 1,025.17 357490 5025426 5822.5512 529.12 357489 5025427 5822.5512 555.17 357584 5025428 5822.5513 411.06 357491- 5025429 5822.5512 308.40 357585 -5025430 5822.5513 251.05 357586 5025431 5822.5513 228.44 357579 5025432 5822.5512 148.92 357487 5025433 5822.5512 3,070.29 357482 5025435 5842.5512 2,420.38 357483 5025436 5842.5513 2,420.24 357481 5025437 5842.5512 2,210.98 357484 5025438 5842.5513 1,370.03 357480 5025439 5842.5512 50.32 357479 5025440 5842.5515 4,764.98 357485 5025441 5842.5513 228.44 357488 5025442 5842.5512 6,376.31 357492 5025443 5862.5512 1,312.48 357589 5025444 5862.5513 398.95 357494 5025445 5862.5512 1,955.32 357590 5025446 5862.5513 2,194.82 357496 5025447 5862.5512 1,801.58 357588 5025448 5862.5513 1,130.07 357495 5025449 5862.5512 10.12- 357594 503547 5862.5513 6.90- 357593 503548 5862.5513 54,825.56 388494 1112012014 129918 JOHNSON, BRIAN Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST.10F GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 11/`!E i�U1410:12:25 Page - 13 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2, - LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summery 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388494 11/20/2014 129918 JOHNSON, BRIAN- Continued... 102.00 PENS 357458 111414REIMBURSE 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 102.00 388495 11120/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 250.00 TOWING 357428 73659 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 250.00 - 388496 11/20/2014 134967 LEACH LAW OFFICE 19,166:00 OCT 2014 FEES 357429 103114 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19,166.00 388497.11/20/2014 136174. LOKKEN, LEONA 85.92 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357272 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 85.92 388498 11/2012014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 82.29 HOOD LACING, HOOD LATCH 00005771 357432 2146623 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 82.29 - 388499 11/2012014 120924 MASTER MECHANICAL INC. 2,839.64 MUA DIAGNOSTICS 00001084 357433 41002D 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - .OTHER 2,839.64 388600 11/20/2014 113941 MEDICA 432.47 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357628. DE LA CRUZ 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 432.47 388601 1112012014 133282 MERIT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC. 11,124.43 REPAIR BLOCK FOUNDATION 357273 14103 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11,124.43 388602 11/20/2014 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 357295 4604 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 171.00 357296 4605 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 171.60 357297 4613 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 513.00 388603 11/2012014 106107 MIDWEST BLINDS 959.04 ROLLER SHADES 357274 30696 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 959.04 11/18/201410:12:25 Page - 14 Business Unit PUBLIC PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LEGAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COLLECTION SYSTEMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY i; R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF . SANA 11/10.- 1410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388503 1112012014 106107 MIDWEST BLINDS Continued... 388604 11/20/2014 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 170.27 'PW SITE MAILING 357547 74005 9234.6106 MEETING EXPENSE GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 170.27 388505 11/20/2014 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 44.39 CO2, METHAIR 357459 171113320 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 44.39 388606 1112012014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 598.50 FABRICATE STEEL COVER 00005773 357298 0107026 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.50 PIPE 00005663, 357435 0107113 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 682.00 388507 11/20/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 112.00 MAILING LABELS 357299 16616 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.00 388608 11/2012014 132697 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 72.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357339 3927 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 72.00 388609 1112012014 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10.00 BOILER LICENSE 357338 ABRO1066511 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 10.00 388510 11/2012014 132691 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 500.00 INSTALL NEW OUTLET 357234 111958 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 500.00 388511 1112012014 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 164.94 PARTS 357300 103114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.96 ANTIFREEZE 357300 103114 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 208.90 388612 11120/2014 123964 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 848.00 ADVERTISING 357530 582587 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 848.00 3886113 11/20/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE ONE CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11118/201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summery 11/20/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388613 11/2012014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. Continued... 384.50 357378 94924 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 388614 11/2012014 134977 NEW LIFE RESTORATION 1,450.00 POOL WALL PATCHING 1,450.00 VERNON SELLING 388616 11120/2014 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 OCT 2014 EAP SERVICES 658.75 NOV 2014 EAP SERVICES 1,317.50 388616: 11120/2014 100347 PAUSTIS.WINE COMPANY 1,864.90 172.25 14.67- 1,286.44 388617 11/20/2014 121040 PC ADVENTURES INC. 2,846.29 50TH REMODEL -VIDEO 2,846.29 388618 11120/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 552.60 388619 11120/2014 136197 PETERSON, RITA 95.29 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 95.29 388620 11/20/2014 100960 PETTY CASH 2.00 5.60 6.40 10.43 357342 450 357531 3697 357532 3711 357380 8473107 -IN 357379 8473117 -IN 357597 8473469 -CM 357381 8474134 -IN' 357596 8474144 -IN 357382 8474149 -IN 357301 456 5311.6180 1556.6103 1556.6103 5822.5513 5822.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862:5513 ` 5821.6406 357383 41649337 5842.5515 357598 41649354 5842.5515 357235 46816690 5520.5510 357548 5539 VILLAGE DR 5900.2015 357533 111414 357533 - :111414 357533 111414 357533 111414 1130.6107 1265.6107 1180.6104 1130.6408 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS CUSTOMER REFUND MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COMMUNICATIONS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/18iz01410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 388520 1112012014 100950 PETTY CASH 36.00- 357605 13.45 357533 111414 1130.6106 13.82 357533 111414 1190.6104 19.28 357533 111414 1130.6410 20.00 357533 111414 1643.6107 21.00 357533 111414 1120.6107 21.00 357533 111414 1495.6107 23.39 357533 111414 1180.6406 24.65 357533 111414 1554.6406 28.48 357533 111414 1627.6103 30.00 357533 111414 1490.6107 43.94 357533 111414 1130.6406 51.50 357533 111414 1130.6107 54.60 357533 111414 1120.6104 61.46 357533 111414 1553.6260 75.00 357533 111414 1495.6104 111.28 357533 111414 1140.6107 6.95 357533 111414 5510.6406 7.96 357533 111414 5840.6106 68.80 357533 111414 5840.6107 114.40 357533 111414 5860.6107 20.97 357533 111414 5952.6406 856.36 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Subledger Account Description Continued... MEETING EXPENSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERALSUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LICENSES & PERMITS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERALSUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS ASSESSING COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL TURF CARE ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS ELECTION CENT SERV GEN - MIS SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PUBLIC HEALTH COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS PLANNING ARENA ADMINISTRATION LIQUOR YORK GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL RECYCLING 388621 1112012014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 36.00- 357605 200156 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.00- 357604 200157 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.33- 357387 202004 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.67- 357388 202005 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,654.99 357384 2694386 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,195.90 357385 2694387 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 208.00 357386 2694628 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 39.08 357500 2697739 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 478.82 357599 2697740 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 336.32 357497 2697741 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 577.16 357600 2697742 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,052.52 357499 2697744 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 784.74 357498 2697745 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 294.96 357501 2697746 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,653.72 357602 2697747 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.16 357603 2697748 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/18/201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388621 11/20/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 628.40 357601 2697750 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10,902.77 388522 11/2012014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,20D.00 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY POSTAGE 357534 111414 1600.6235 POSTAGE PARKADMIN. GENERAL 4,200.00 388523 1112012014 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 75.91 622833 WATER 357343 313870964 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 75.91 388624 11/20/2014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 171.00 BLADE SHARPENING 357236 271890 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 171.00 388626 11120/2014 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 35,190.09 RECYCLING 357239 3650450 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 35,190.09 388626 11120/2014 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 124,258.99, RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 357633 9-23 #5 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 124,258.99 388627 11120/2014 136172 RINGOLD, BRENDA 115.20 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357275 6800 VALLEY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VIEW RD 115.20 388628 11/2012014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 593.00 SOFTENER SALT 357240 00306727 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 593.00 388629 11/2012014 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 544.17 UNIFORM PURCHASE 357549 111514 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 544.17 388530 11/20/2014 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 100.00 TICKET TO FUNDRAISER & GALA 357303 FOUNDATION 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/18/z01410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388631 11120/2014 121678 SAABYE, PETER Continued... 280.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 357550 111314 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 280.56 368532 11/2012014 117807 SAM'S CLUB 101.27 CUPS, CREAMER, WATER 357461 110714 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 145.00 AUTO MEMBERSHIPS 357461 110714 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 246.27 388633 11120/2014 100996 SEH 259.35 BRAEMAR GC WETLANDS PROJECT 357436 289494 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 259.35 388634 11/2012014 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 477.00 NOV 2014 FEE 357535 008816 -11/14 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 477.00 388636 11/20/2014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 626.00 VMWARE SUPPORT 357304 B02675494 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,068.00 OFFICE365 LICENSES 00004421 357305 B02678833 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,696.00 388636 11/2012014 120784 SIGN PRO 617.00 STAIR GRAPHICS 357241 8277 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 488.00 SCENARIO MATRIX SIGNS 357242 8372 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 55.00 NOW OPEN BANNER 357276 8442 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 54.98 GIFT CARD SIGN 357536 8453 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 54.98 GIFT CARD SIGN 357536 8453 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 54.98 GIFT CARD SIGN 357536 8453 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 1,324.94 388537 1112012014 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 52.70 TIME CLOCK RENTAL 357346 13068174 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 52.70 388538 11/2012014 105664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 1,001.87 SENSOR REPLACEMENT 357347 80709161 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,001.87 388639 1112012014 131886 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 83.76 HOT DOG BUNS 357243 251459 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS . R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1112012014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 388539 11/2012014 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 83.76 388540 11120/2014 132196 - SMALL LOT MN 947.50 357608 1356 5862.5513 947.50 388641 11120/2014 100430 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 214.75 RATCHET, EXTENSION 00005797 357306 AVR/24025292 1553.6556 214.75 388642 11/20/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 909.70 1.50 .75 671.16 8,087.45 3,996.26 1,256.25 -203.25 1,464.15 - 8,792.50 203.25 124.50 1,086.23 7,494.05 203.25 2,768.10 12,885.10 - 161.50 9,139.50 59,448.45 388643 11/20/2014 105193 SPAIN, MARK 295.00 TREE.REMOVAL 295.00 388644 1112012014 _134700 SPOK INC. 107.28 PAGERS 107.28 357551 1201254 357611 1219996 357610 1219997 357389 1221221 357392 1221222 357390 1222570 357391 1222571 357503 1223624 357502 1223625 357612 1223626 357394 1223627 357504 1223628 357505 1223629 357393 1223630 357398 1223631 357397 1223632 357395 1223633 357396 1223634 357609 1224971 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 357348 OCT 20 5422.6180 357437 X0319246K 1400.6151 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE TOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 11/18/201410:12:25 Page - 20 Business Unit VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BOTH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST-SELLING BOTH ST SELLING 50TH.ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 11/20/2014 101016 STREICHERS CITY OF EDINA 11/18/201410:12:25 124.99 VEST REPAIR 357277 11115516 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 388560 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary ' 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 1,083.76 50TH REMODEL- ROUTE CABLE 357538 11/20/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388646 11/2012014 134926 STACON RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 357441 Continued... 40,259.10 995.25 TRANSDUCER CABLE 00001914 357307 IN00076347 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM 'LIFT STATION MAINT 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 995.25 120.40 MILEGE REIMBURSEMENT 357636 388646 11120/2014 129360 STANLEY.CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS` 388663 229.98 ALARM MONITORING 357635 .10373405 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 14.26 214.00 SERVICE CALL 357634 9897847 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 443.98 388664 11/20/2014 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 388547 11120/2014 100660 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. SALT SPREADER 357309 S205526 -IN 183.75 KEYS 357537 903676371 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 183.75 388646 1112012014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 163.75 357506 4119 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 388549 11/20/2014 101016 STREICHERS 124.99 VEST REPAIR 357277 11115516 124.99 388560 11/20/2014 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 1,083.76 50TH REMODEL- ROUTE CABLE 357538 18201 1,083.76 388661 11/20/2014 133163 SUPERIOR PAINTING & DECORATING INC. 40,259.10 RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 357441 P -23#4 40,259.10 388552 1112012014 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 120.40 MILEGE REIMBURSEMENT 357636 111714 120.40 388663 11120/2014 101326 TER_ MINAL SUPPLY CO 14.26 LAMP BULBS 357442 61816 -01 14.26 388664 11/20/2014 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE - 430.00 SALT SPREADER 357309 S205526 -IN 430.00 1400.6203 5821.6406 44012.6710 1140.6107 1553.6530 1646.6406 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # _. Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description- - 388665 11/2012014 136176 THOMPSON, NAOMI R. Continued... 688.44 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357278 111114 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 688.44 388656 11/20/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 11118/201410:12:25 Page - 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 359.00- 357508 00772389 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,938.15 357507 859287 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,579.15 - 388657 11/20/2014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 1,067.66 ELEVATOR SERVICE 357349 3001410411 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,067.66 388668 11120/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 173.25 AUTOSET 00005632 357443 10042359 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 31.53 WELDING TANKS 00002322 357350 40017255 5761.640.6 GENERAL SUPPLIES 204.78 388669 11/2012014 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 309.65 COPIER USAGE 357462 265748285 7410.6575 PRINTING 309.65 388660 11/2012014 116536 TRAVELERS 630.00 357312 000471411 1550.6200 INSURANCE _ 262.50 DEDUCTIBLE 357310. 000471797 1550.6200 INSURANCE 655.00 357311 000471798 1550.6200 INSURANCE 1,547.50 388661 1112012014 117828 TRICARE FOR LIFE 87.73 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 357279 CAROLEE A. EIDE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 87.73 388562 11/20/2014 105243 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 2,770.21 50TH STORE REMODEL 357552 214032A -7 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,770.21 388663 11/2012014 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 1,284.00 FITNESS FOR DUTY 357539 16612115 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 1,284.00 388664 1112012014 126032 UNI- .SELECT USA CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014— 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation- PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388564 11/20/2014 126032 UNI- SELECT USA Continued... 1,104.42 PARTS 357444 103114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 9.35 PARTS 357444 103114 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,113.77 368566 1.1120/2014 136190 UNLEASHED DISPLAYS LLC 500.00 CAMPAIGN UTILITY BOX WRAP 357540 1944 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 388666 11/2012014 101908 US FOODS 71.60 357351 103114 5421.6406 -GENERAL SUPPLIES 795.11 -357351 103114 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 866.71 388667 11/20/2014 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,613.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001083 357313 20913 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,613.00 388568 11/2012014 102276 VAN BLOEM GARDENS 231.52 BULBS 357352 4018890 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 231.52 388569 11/2012014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 4.82- CREDIT 357543 328704CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 53.99 CLEAR ROLL LINER, GLOVES 357541 329554 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 414.27 LIQUOR BAGS 357542 329557 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 463.44 388670 1112012014 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,980.00 NOV 2014 CLEANING SERVICES 357244 33727 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,980.00 388671 11/2012014 ' .136180 VANTAGE APPAREL 1,077.66, STAFF APPAREL 357353 N104602 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,677.66 368672 11/20/2014 103252 VEAP 1,055.00 MMBA FOOD DRIVE 357245 111014 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,936.00 MMBA FOOD DRIVE 357245 111014 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,991.00 11/18/201410:12:25 Page - 23 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE PUBLIC ART GRILL - GRILL DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ARENA'ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388673 11/2012014 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE Continued... 625.00 CATALOG DESIGN 357354 2014 -3 1629.6575 PRINTING 625.00 388674 1112012014 120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 163.30 RECYCLED LAMPS 357246 EW729779 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ,163.30 388676 11/2012014 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 357464 9734680545 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 35.01 357464 9734680545 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 140.04 357464 9734680545 1260.6188 TELEPHONE 251.97 357464 9734680545 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 315.09 - 357464 9734680545. 1495.6188 TELEPHONE 385.13 357464 9734680545 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 764.05 357464 9734680545 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 35.01 357464 9734680545 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 175.05 357464 9734680545 5910.6188 TELEPHONE 756.30 357463 9734732949 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.16 357463 9734732949 5910.6188 TELEPHONE ' 2,923.82 388676 11/20/201.4 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION 1,109.06 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003831 357355 147939 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 1,109.06 388677 11/20/2014 136179 VINCENT BROWN TRUCKING AND CONSTRUCTION 1,090.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 357314 3320 W 56TH ST 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 1,090.00 388678 11120/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 734.64 357613 62617 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 734.64 388679 1112012014 136199 VOEHL EXCAVATING INC. 2,000.00 4232/34 VALLEY VIEW RD 357637 2336 SERVICE 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,000.00 388680 11120/2014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 54.34 BRATS 357250 82456 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 54.34 11/18/201410:12:25 Page- 24 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION, ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH&FR PARKING &WAYFINDING GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. CITY OF EDINA 944.80 7700 FRANCE AVE TRAFFIC STUDY 357252 Council Check Register by GL 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING . 7,174.16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11405935 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 8,118.96 11/20/2014 - 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 388680 11/20/2014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 388581 11120/2014 357401 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,463.16 156.30 LIGHT BULBS 00001958 357356 15254658 -01 1470.6530 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 179.16 LIGHTING 00001972 357315 15254875 -D1 1551.6406 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 156.00 LIGHTING 357316 15255259 -00 1551.6406 7005603 5842.5513 170.50 LIGHTING 357316 :15255259 -00 5111.6406 357617 7005604 661.96 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,950.16 388682 1112012014 133615 WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT ADMIN 388586 11/2012014 185.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 357553 111714 1000.2055 185.00 357402 1080248830 388683 1112012014 50TH ST SELLING 136181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 357620 1080248831 5822.5515 5,448.09 GAS & DIESEL 00006277 357357 202878,203289 5422.6581 357413 1080248632 5,448.09 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 625.17 Subledger Account Description Continued... REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/18/201410:12:25 Page- 25 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 388684 1112012014 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 944.80 7700 FRANCE AVE TRAFFIC STUDY 357252 11405934 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING . 7,174.16 7200 FRANCE AVE TRAFFIC STUDY 357251 11405935 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 8,118.96 388585 1112012014 101312 'WINE MERCHANTS 1,704.92 357401 7004613 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,463.16 357618 7005600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 156.36 357510 7005602 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 635.96 357511 7005603 5842.5513 ,COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,989.76 357617 7005604 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,950.16 388586 11/2012014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,352.95 357402 1080248830 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 73.15 357620 1080248831 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,431.55 357413 1080248632 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 625.17 357621 1080249877 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,266.35 357403 1080251598 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,452.65 357405 1080251599 5862.5518 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,768.05 357406 1080251600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 88.09 357404 1080251601 5862.5515 COST OF'GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,968.70 357619 1080251602 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,895.19 357512 1080251603 5822,5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/181201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/2012014- 11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388586 11/20/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 3,603.42 357407 1080251634 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 275.50 357408 1080251635 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 845.20 357410 1080251636 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.15 357411 1080251637 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,759.83 357409 1080251638 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 65.00- 357412 2080060504 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.05- 357513 2680062800 5842.5512 COST O_ F GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22,408.90 388687 11120/2014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 4,847.41 357625 .-1090315688 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 130.50 357624 1090315689 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,664.00 357515 1090316024 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,156.10., 357414 1090316719 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 678.06 357415 1090316720 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.10 357416 1090316751 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD: MIX YORK SELLING 2,119.70 357622 1090318942; 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 775.20 357623 1090318943 5822.5514 COST-OF GOODS SOLD BEER- 50TH ST SELLING '. 2,296.98 357514 1090318944 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,690.99 388588- 11120/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 6,875.45 51- 6824328 -7 357255 433695717 5420.6185 LIGHT.& POWER CLUB HOUSE 3,444.27 51- 6840050 -6 357445 433697399 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 31,735.94 51- 4888627 -1 357253 433843715 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 533,19 51- 5619094 -8 357254 433855239 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT,SVC PW BUILDING 3,004.38 51- 5888961 -7 357256 433859997 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 646.50 51- 4197645 -8 357280 434021789 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 4,988.14 51- 6121102 -5 357465- 434053181 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 51,227.87 388589 11/20/2014 106079 YOUNG, CARLA 500.00 WATERMAIN DAMAGE REPAIR 357317 REIMBURSE 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 500.00 388690 11/20/2014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 245.00 357626 13453 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,035,147.04 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals R55CKR2 �uIS101 CITY G', '_JINA 11 /1 is/201410:12:25 Council Check Register by GL Page _ 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/20/2014— .11/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,035,147.04 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,002,613.98 A/PACH Payment 32,533.06 Total Payments 1,035,147.04 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 11/18/201410:12:35 Council Check Summary Page- 1 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 96,332.20 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,203.72 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 100.00 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 500.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 493,056.20 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 11,185.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,541.69 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,701.96 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,512.70 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 17,620.49 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 45,499.36 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,379.60 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 11,446.46 05750- CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND _ 4,389.16 05800 LIQUOR FUND 287,234.11 05900. UTILITY FUND 17,755.17 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,025.37 05950 RECYCLING FUND 35,211.06 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,144.32 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 170.27 09235 VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 100.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,038.20 Report Totals 1,035,147.04 11/20/2014 - 11/2012014 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies end R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register by GL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 11/21/2014 - 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 687 11/2712014 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 127.69 3 WAY MANIFOLD 368181 0141467 -IN 1553.6530 127.69 688 11/27/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 69.60 358267 1844268 5842.5515 69.60 689 11/27/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 367.07 COFFEE 357639 1153166 1550_.6406 367.07 690 11/27/2014 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 1,982.00 LEGAL SERVICES 358152 137749 1170.6103 1,982.00 691 11/2712014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 2,444.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 358018 23270354.00 -210 5960.6103 3,076.00 WETLAND MONITORING 358017 23270354.13 -10 04406.1705.20 5,520.00 692 11127/2014 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1.55 358002 5862.5514 171.55 358270 45703600 5842.5512 546.65 358001 45703700 5862.5512 621.65 358271 45814700 5862.5512 655.40 358273 45814900 5822.5512 36.55 358272 45815200 5822.5515 86.19 358274 91155500 5822.5515 2,119.54 693 1112712014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 54.03- CREDIT 358172 CP -WO- 973589 -1 1550.6406 2.64- CREDIT 358187 CP -WO- 974172 -1 1190.6406 46.45 CUSTOM STAMP 358117 IN -31591 1400.6406 2.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 357980 OE- 375639 -1 1190.6406 40.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358021 OE- 375740 -1 1260.6406 145.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358116 WO- 973589 -1 1550.6406 24.37 DRY ERASE MARKERS 00003100 358020 WO- 973908 -1 1400.6513 370.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358118 WO- 974708 -1 1550.6406 373.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358171 WO- 975362 -1 1550.6406 11/241201414:43:24 Page - 1 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL HUMAN RESOURCES . ENGINEER SERVICES - .STORM 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION IMPR VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST,SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc.No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 693 11/27/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 947.16 694 11/2712014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 16.36 FOLDERS, HAND SANITIZER 357645 102590 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 39.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 357646 102766 1552.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 156.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003505 358189 102893 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 211.90 696 11/27/2014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 150.60 COVERS 00005764 358028 903047X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.63 LINK 00005827 358029 904733 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.48 ELEMENT 00005859 358194 908133 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 712.86 CONTROLS, MOTORS 00005860 358033 908381 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.04 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005861 358030 908419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 235.39 SENSORS, TANK 00005862 358032 908504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.22 WIRE ASSEMBLY, PIN 00005862 358031 908623 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 202.74 INSTRUMENT PANEL 00005862 358039 908623X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.62 BRAKE KITS, SEALS, GASKETS 00005864 358034 909210 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.27 DASH PANEL 00005865 358036 909221 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 174.20 FILTERS 00005840 358035 909264 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.18 FILTERS, ELEMENTS 00005844 358037 909428 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.04 ELEMENTS 00005844 358038 909428X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.90 COOLANT 00005846 358040 910145 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.03 LAMP 00005847 358119 911223 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00- CREDIT 358025 CM887956 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.00- CREDIT 358024 CM892955 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00- CREDIT 358026 CM894098 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 331.90- CREDIT 358027 CM903956 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,775.30 696 11/27/2014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 162.00 MATERIALS TESTING 357647 8014254 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 284.25 MATERIALS TESTING 358043 8014418 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCEAVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 2,167.25 MATERIALS'TESTING 358042 B014438 01423.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION OLINGER BLVD M &O 631.00 MATERIALS TESTING 358041 B014487 01406.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 6,413.00 INSPECTIONS /TESTING 357981 B014603 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 5,645.94 .TEST PIT ANALYSIS 358044 B015006 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELAPK SHELTER & TURF .15,303.44 697 11127/^-'-t 120936 CAMPBELL KNUTSON R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 358083 778872 602 11/27/2014 121636 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2,000.00 ACTIVITY GUIDE DESIGN 358215 13407 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 2,000.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 697 11/27/2014 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 120936 CAMPBELL KNUTSON W33062 Continued... 16,379.88 LEGAL COUNSEL 357983 2851 -000G -10/14 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 86.50 16,379.88 358055 83948 86.50 698 11/27/2014 606 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 101792 LUBE -TECH 3,055.50 65,772.98 SAN STORAGE 358120 QR43674 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 65,772.98 699 1112712014 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 401.00 CLEANERS, DEGREASER 357651 518197 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES- ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 401.00 600 11127/2014 104020 DALCO 1,878.14 SIDEWALK SALT 00005723 358199 2808126 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 92.90 ANTIBACTERIAL CLEANER 00001967 357653 2815542 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,971.04 601 11/27/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 518.11 358008 778868 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING 24.60 358084 778869 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 49.20 7 tar Gd 358007 358006 778870 778871 5842.5515 5842 5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 358083 778872 602 11/27/2014 121636 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC 2,000.00 ACTIVITY GUIDE DESIGN 358215 13407 2,000.00 603 11/27/2014 131734 HORWITZ INC. 10,137.87 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 358347 W33062 10,137.87 604 11/27/2014 121076 JIMMY S JOHNNYS INC. 86.50 TOILET RENTAL 358055 83948 86.50 606 11127/2014 101792 LUBE -TECH 3,055.50 OIL 00005788 357662 534284 3,055.50 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON,SELLING 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014 - 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 606 11127/2014 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 900.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 358157 9430 1556.6121 900.00 607 11/2712014 101483 MENARDS 56.85 STRETCH WRAP, BRUSHES 00001844 358235 68343 1301.6406 34.71 PLASTIC HOUSING 00001851 358238 68513 1318.6406 25.85 SPRAY PAINT 00001869 358237 68943 1325.6406 17.84 CEMENT, LEVEL 00001879 358236 69112 1301.6406 130.05 NAILS, FURRING STRIPS 00001950 358228 70153 1318.6406 111.57 FURRING STRIPS, TAPE 00001957 358229 70226 1318.6406 71.82 CONCRETE, WRENCH SET 00001977 358231 70742 1552.6406 39.49 LUMBER, POLY GLOSS 00001982 358230 70769 1301.6406 51.00 CONCRETE BLOCKS 00001987 358233 70955 1344.6577 35.46 VALVE, DROP CLOTH 00001992 358232 70956 5521.6406 12.99 PREMIXED MORTAR 358234 71041 5521.6406 114.09 PAINT, SUPPLIES 00001043 357666 71319 1648.6406 150.83 ANCHORS, NAILS, RODS 00001047 357665 71433 47085.6710 33.98 SCREWS 00001982 358227 71451 4090.6406 216.08 CHAINLINK FENCE, HARDWARE 00001063 358240 71996 1500.6406 10.02 RAIL END CAPS, CLAMPS 00001063 358242 71999 1500.6406 6.46 HEX NUTS, HINGES 00001068 358241 72017 1500.6406 2.23 DRILL HEX, TIE WIRE 00001075 358239 72149 1500.6406 111.80 SHOP TOWELS, ANTIFREEZE 00001092 358062 72154 5921.6406 123.53 THREADED RODS, HARDWARE 00001129 358226 72607 47085.6710 , 1,356.65 608 1112712014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 492.00 GRASS SEED 00001040 357671 990647 -00 1644.6543 492.00 609 1112712014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 570.00 PIPE 00001998 358247 303252 1343.6406 570.00 610 11127/2014 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 22,142.81 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 358350 112614 07114.1705.30 157,998.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 358350 112614 01406.1705.30 22,291.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 358350 112614 03479.1705.30 27,480.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 358350 112614 05537.1705.30 1,662.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 358350 112614 04395.1705.30 Subledger Account Description Continued... ADVERTISING PERSONNEL GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES .GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERALSUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW;& ICE REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD TREES & MAINTENANCE BRIDGES GUARD RAILS S114 GRIMES AVE SIDEWALK MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11124/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 610 11127/2014 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. Continued... 231, 575.98 611 11/27/2014 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 720.75 HVAC CONTRACT 358160 59838 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 720.75 612 11/27/2014 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 2,490.00 STREET SWEEPINGS DISPOSAL 358250 5716 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,490.00 613 11/27/2014 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 1,378.00 FLOODING HOSES 357676 0055861 -IN 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,378.00 614 11/27/2014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 172.50 DRINKING FOUNTAIN PLUMBING 357677 16979 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,145.50 WATER HEATER INSTALLATION 357678 16997 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,318.00 616 11/2712014 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 180.00 DS HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY 00005848 358146 33276 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 180.00 616 11/27/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 1,253.50 CUTTING EDGES, PLOW BOLTS 00005845 358075 1536485 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,253.50 617 11/27/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA 90.83 358324 0112127 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 367.50 358323 0112128 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 158.50 358327 0112130 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 'VERNON SELLING 989.50 358326 0112131 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 78.50 358825 0112170 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,684.83 618 11/2712014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 695.64 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357694 40955168 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,123.93 CONCESSION PRODUCTS 357693 41047114 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS -- 1,819.57 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register. by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/2112014 - 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 619 1112712014 101033' WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 528.25 358330 377627 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 528.25 358099 377628 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 938.85 358100 377828 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,450.34 358329 377985 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,445.69 620 11/27/2014 132563 YALE MECHANICAL 10,070.00 50TH REMODEL 358360 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,070.00 388691 11/21/2014 131091 ABENA, STACY 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE . 357698 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 388692 11/21/2014 106467 ABY, KATHERINE 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357699 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 388693 11/21/2014 104617 ACKER, RITA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357700 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388694 11/21/2014 134998 ,AHLER, MINDY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357701 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388695 11/21/2014 134999 ALLINSON, KRISTINE 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357702 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388696 11/21/2014 108666 ALT, JOHN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357703 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388697 11/2112014 135000 AMUNDSON, WENDY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357704 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388698 11/21/2014 136001 ANDERSON, REILLY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357705 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOG IS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 11121/2014— 11/27/2014 ` Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388598 11121/2014" 135001 ANDERSON, REILLY J Continued... 170.63 388599 11/2112014 136002 BALOGH, MARY 11/24/201414:43:24 Page- 7 Business Unit 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357706 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388600 11121/2014 127094 BECKER, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357707 "111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388601 11/2112014 135003 BENDER, ELLIE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357708 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388602 11121/2014 134676 BERTRAND, SHERYL 126.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357709 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 126.75 388603 11/21/2014 104698 BEUERLEIN, CYNTHIA 87.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357710 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES' ELECTION 87.75 388604 11/2112014 123486 WELLAND, ERIC 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357711 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 388605 11/21/2014 136004 WELLAND, KENRICK ELECTION 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357712 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388606 11/21/2014 136006 BJORN, VIVIAN 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357713 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 386607 11121/2014 106479 BOEMER, JULIET L. 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 357714 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 388608 11121/2014 136006- BOGERT, KATHERINE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357715 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388608 11/21/2014 136006 BOGERT, KATHERINE Continued... 165.75 388609 11/21/2014 136007' BOLIN, JANICE 168.19. ELECTION JUDGE 357716 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388610 11/21/2014 116939 BORGEN, HOLLY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357717 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388611 11/21/2014 104680 BRADBURY, KATHERINE 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 357718 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 216.56 388612 11/21/2014 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 264.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357719 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 264.38 388613 11/2112014 106482 BRELLENTHIN, ADELE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357720 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19, 388614 11/21/2014 136008 BRIGGS, PAIGE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357721 1111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388615 11121/2014 121117 BRISCOE, DAVID 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357722 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 166.19 388616 11/21/2014 123162 BRONNER, KATHY 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357723 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388617 11/21/2014 136009 BURCH, ALYSSA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357724 .111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388618 11/2112014 106486 BURNETT; JAMES H. 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357725 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 41/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388618 11/21/2014 106486 BURNETT, JAMES H. Continued... 170.63 388619 1112112014 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357726 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388620 11/2112014 131096 CARDWELL, LINDA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357727 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388621 11/21/2014 127412 CARLSON, NANCY 185.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357728 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 185.25 388622 11121/2014... 136011. CHAMBERLAIN, KATHERINE .165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357729 111914 1160.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388623 11/21/2014 136010 CHAMBERLAIN, NICHOLAS 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357730 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388624 1112112014 106491 CHASE, M_ARLYS 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357731 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388626 11/21/2014 123156 CHRISTIANSEN, MARILYN 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357732 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - 141.38 388626 11121/2014 114404 CIPOLLA, JUDY 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357733 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 388627 11/2112014 136012 CLARK, SUSAN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357734 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388628 11121/2014 136013 COKER, DAVID 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357735 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF -EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 r Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388628. 11121/2014, 136013 COKER, DAVID Continued... 168.19 388629 11121/2014 136014 COLE, ROBERTA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357736 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388630 11/21/2014 136016 CONRAD, ABBY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357737 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388631 11/21/2014 104626 COOKE, EILEEN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357738 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 ._ 388632 11/21/2014 136017 ,COOPERMAN, MADELINE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357739 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388633 11/21/2014 136018 COTTER, PHOEBE 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357740 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388634 11/21/2014 104627 CRACRAFT, JOHN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357741 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388636 11121/2014 104628 CRACRAFT, MARIAN 92.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357742 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 92.63 388636 11/21/2014 104529 CREW, COLLEEN 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 357743 111914 1180.6013, SALARIES TEMP.EMPLOYEES ELECTION 199.69 388637 11121/2014 123167 . CROKER, DEBORAH 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357744 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388638 11/2112014, 106612 CRONSTROM, RICHARD 24:38 ELECTION JUDGE 357745 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description 388638 11121/2014 106512 CRONSTROM, RICHARD Continued... 24.38 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 11 Business Unit 388639 11/2112014 122562 CRUM, SPENCER 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357746 111.914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388640 11121/2014 127416 DALE, BYRON 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357747 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388641 11121/2014 127416 DALE, JUDITH 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357748 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388642 1112112014 135020 DANIELS, TIERRA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357749 111914 1160.6013 SALARIESTEMP.EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388643 11/2112014 136022 DAVIS, ALLISON 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357750 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 388644 11/2112014 135021 DAVIS, KEVIN 163.31. ELECTION JUDGE 357751 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388646 11/2112014 123168 DEMAREST, AMY 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357752 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388646 11/21/2014 104531 DILL, PATRICIA 205.31 . ELECTION JUDGE 357753 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 205.31 388647 11121/2014 135023 DING, ERIKA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357754 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES-TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388648 11/2112014 136024 DONAHUE, MARY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357755 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357760 CITY OF EDINA 1180.6013 11/24/201414:43:24 ELECTION 170.63 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 388664 11/MM2014 123161 DUNN, SALLY Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357761 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES Check # Date Amount Supplier (Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388648 11/2112014 136024 DONAHUE, MARY Continued... 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357762 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 388649 1112112014 214.31 130723 DONOVAN, WENDY 388666 11/21/2014 220.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357756 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP. EMPLOYEES ELECTION 220.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357763 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 388660 11121/2014 205.31 108665 DOUGLAS, SUZANNE 388667 11/21/2014 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357757 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357764 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 388661 11121/2014 165.75 134678 DRAKE, FRANK 388668 11/2112014 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357758 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357765 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 388652 11/2112014 134679 DULAS, KIM 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357759 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388663 11/2112014 136026 DUNN, JILLIAN B 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357760 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388664 11/MM2014 123161 DUNN, SALLY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357761 11914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388666 11/21/2014 130724 EBERLEIN, EMMA 214.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357762 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 214.31 388666 11/21/2014 130726 EBERLEIN, ERIKA 205.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357763 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 205.31 388667 11/21/2014 127420 ENGEBRETSON, JEANENE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357764 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388668 11/2112014 136026 FAY, JOSEPHINE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357765 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION B R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388668 1112112014 135026 FAY, JOSEPHINE Continued... 165.75 388669 11121/2014 116948 FIEDLER, BOB 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357766 .111914 J 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388660 11/2112014 104534 FINK, PAUL 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE.... 357767 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 388661 11121/2014 136027 FITTIPALDI, GRACE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357768 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP-EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388662 11121/2014 135028 FIX, LILLIAN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357769 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388663 1112112014 127086 FOSSUM, JOHN 205.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357770 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 205.31 388664 11/21/2014 106393 FREY, KATHERINE 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357771 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388665 11121/2014 130726 FULUVAKA, SUZANNE 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357772 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388666 11121/2014 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE 270.00 ELECTION JUDGE 357773 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 270.00 388667 11/2112014 136029 GHARBI, AMIR ARNOLD 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357774 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388668 11/21/2014 116961 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357775 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014 — 11/27/2014 Check # - Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388668 11/2112014 116951 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH Continued... 239.06 388669 11/21/2014 121613 GOUGH, RUTH 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357776 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388670 11/2112014 103889 GRETTE, MYRTLE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357777 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388671 11/21/2014 117132 GRIES, PATRICIA 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357778 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES, ELECTION 175.50 388672 11/2112014 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE III 121.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357779 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 121.88 388673 11/21/2014 120369 HALLORAN, BARBARA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357780 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388674 11/21/2014 106666 HAMAN, EUGENE E. 199.69 ELECTION JUDGE 357761 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 199.69 388676 11/21/2014 120269 HANSEN, BRIAN 170.14 ELECTION JUDGE 357782 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.14 388676 11/21/2014 136031 HANSEN, GRIFFIN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357783 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388677 11/21/2014 117134 'HANSEN, JUDITH 58.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357784 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 58.50 388678 11/21/2014 136030 ,HANSEN, LOGAN 171.60 ELECTION JUDGE 357785 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24401414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014" Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388678 11/2112014 136030 HANSEN, LOGAN Continued... 171.60 388679 11121/2014 136032 HARDIE, PATRICK 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357786 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388680 11/2112014 120372 HARRIS, GEORGE 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357787 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388681 11121/2014 120244 HASNUDEEN, BUDDY . 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357788 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388682 11/2112014 136033 HASPER, JOAN 131.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357789 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 131.63 - 388683 11/2112014 123603 HATZUNG, LISA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357790 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388684 11121/2014 106676 HELEY, CHERYL 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357791 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 388686 11/2112014 117138 HIDEM, MARIE 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357792 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 388686 11/21/2014 127429 HIGGINS, JAMES 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357793 111914 1180.6013 - SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388687 11/2112014 136063 HOBBS, MADISON 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357794 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388688 11/2112014 134680 HOGLIN, SANDRA _ 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 367795 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388688 11/21/2014 134680 HOGLIN, SANDRA Continued... 168.19 _ 388689 11/21/2014 136064 HOKKANEN, EILEEN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357796 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388690 11/21/2014 135055 HOLDEN, JACK 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357797 111914 1130.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388691 '11121/2014 130728 HOLST, ALAN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357798 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388692 11/21/2014 106396 HOPF, NANCY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357799 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388693 11/21/2014 135056 HORSTMAN, EVA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357800 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388694 11/21/2014 136067 HOULE, CAITLIN 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357801 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388695 11121/2014 121262 HUNT, DONNA - 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357802 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 388696 11121/2014 105397 HYKES, MYRA 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357803 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 388697 11121/2014 136068 JERSTAD, SARAH 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357804 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 166.19 388698 11/21/2014 120376 JRNANI, SUZANNE 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357805 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/2u1414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388698 11/2112014 120376 JIWANI, SUZANNE Continued... 141.38 388699 11/21/2014 106598 JOHNSON, ALLEN C. 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357806 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388700 1112112014 134683 JOHNSON, GRANT 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357807 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388701 11/2112014 136069 JOHNSON, MADISON 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357808 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388702 11/21/2014 135060 JONES, LILY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357809 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388703 1112112014 136061 JORGENSON, LYNN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357810 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388704 1112112014 106608 KACHAN,,MARY K. 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357811 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.50 388705 11121/2014 106638 KAPAUN, ANN 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357812 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388706 11/21/2014 123613 KATZ, DALIA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357813 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388707 .11/21/2014 134684 KECK, PAUL 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357814 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 388708 1112112014 106639 KEENAN, ANN 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 357815 111914 1180.6013' SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary, 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388708 11121/2014 106539 KEENAN, ANN Continued... 233.44 388709 1112112014 130763 KEINER, JOAN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357816 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388710 1112112014 135062 KETCHUM, SANJANA - 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357817 1111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES. ELECTION 173.06 388711 11/21/2014 131108 KIKER, SHARON 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357818 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 388712 1112112014 106640 KINGSTON, JESSICA 229.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357819 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 229.50 388713 1112112014 106641 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357820 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388714 11/21/2014 136063 KILOS, SARA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357821 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 - 388715. 11121/2014 105399 KOESTER, MARCIA 345.94 ELECTION JUDGE 357822 111914 1180.6011 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 345.94 388716 11/21/2014 136064 KOHLBRY, GAYLE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357823 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388717 11121/2014 106543 KOPP, JANET 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357824 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388718 11121/2014 106646 KOSTERS, JULIA 82.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357825 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101' CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388718 11/2112014 106646 KOSTERS, JULIA Continued... 82.88 388719 11/21/2014 136066 KOSTUCH, KEITH 164.78 ELECTION JUDGE 357826 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 164.78 388720 11/2112014 120381 KOUATLI, MARTHA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357827 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 388721 1112112014 130764 KOUDSI, HANA 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357828 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388722 1112112014 136066 KRAMER, JENNA CLAIRE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357829 11914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388723 11/2112014 134686 LABONNE, JUDY 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357830 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.50 388724 11/21/2014 133174 LAFFERTY, FRED 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357831 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388726 11/21/2014 136067 LANCE, ALEXIS 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357832 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388726 11/21/2014 123179 LANDBERG, JAMES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357833 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388727 11/2112014 106660 LANDBERG, MARY 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 357834 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 388728 1112112014 121626 LANE, PAUL 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357835 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION- R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388728 11121/2014 121626 LANE, PAUL Continued... 141.38 388729 11/21/2014 123180 LANZ, KAREN 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357836 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 388730 11/21/2014 136068 LAZARETTI, DELORES 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357837 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 388731 11/21/2014 136069 LEE, CATHERINE c r 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357838 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388732 11/21/2014 136070 LEHNHOFF, DONALD 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357839 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 388733 11/21/2014 123177 LEON, KAREN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357840 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388734 11/2112014 136071 LEWIS- JOHNSON, RACHEL 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357841 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 388735 11/21/2014 123523 LINDSAY, SUSAN 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357842 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 388736 11/21/2014 136072 LITKEWITSCH, SOPHIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357843 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388737 11/2112014 136073 LITMAN, MITZI 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357844 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388738 11/21/2014 127089 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357845 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11121/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388738' 11121/2014 127089 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA Continued... 141.38 388739 11/2112014 120249 LUCAS, WILLIAM 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 21 Business Unit 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357846 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388740 11/2112014 123183 MAEDER, BARBARA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357847 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388741 11/2112014 108674 MAETZOLD, LINDA 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357848 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 388742 11/21/2014 134686 MALLON, ROBERT 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357849 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388743 '11/21/2014 136076 MARSHALL, EMILY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357850 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388744 11/21/2014 136076 MARTIN, JAMES 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357851 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388746 11/21/2014 120386 MAST, BOYD 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357852 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 388746 11/21/2014 130768 MAZZARA, PATTI 205.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357853 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 205.31 388747 1112112014 106689 MCGOLDRICK, FRANCIS 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357854 111914 1180:6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388748 11/21/2014 136077 MCHUGH, MATT 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357855 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388748 11/2112014 135077 MCHUGH, MATT Continued... - 165.75. 388749 11121/2014 136099 MELKEN MALOOLY, MARIA 11/24/201414:43:24, Page- 22 Business Unit 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357856 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388760 11/21/2014 120260 MENZEL, MARVIN 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357857 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388761 11/21/2014 116961 MILLER, NANCY 244.69 ELECTION JUDGE 357858 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 244.69 388762 11/2112014 136100 MONSOUR, SYDNEY 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357859 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 388763 1112112014 106606 MONTEZ, PATRICIA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357860 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388764 11/21/2014 104661 MONTGOMERY, BETH 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357861 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 388766 11/21/2014 135101 MORROW, COOPER 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357862 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388766 11/21/2014 136102 MUNIC, SOP HIA 131.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357863 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 131.63 388767 11121/2014 136103 .NATHAN, KESHINI 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357864 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388768 11/21/2014 120393 NAZARIAN, BARBARA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357865 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 . LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388768 11/2112014 120393 NA2ARIAN, BARBARA - Continued... 168.19 388769 11/2112014 136104 NELSON, LAURA 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 23 Business Unit 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357866 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388760 11/21/2014 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN 170.63' ELECTION JUDGE 357867 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388761 11/2112014 136106 NISSEN, KIMBERLY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357868 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 -388762 11/21/2014 136106 NYE, DANIEL 170.63' ELECTION JUDGE 357869 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388763 11/21/2014 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 306.56 ELECTION JUDGE 357870 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 306.56 388764 11121/2014 136107 OLSEN, ROSALIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357871 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388766 11121/2014 120264 O'NEILL, ORDELL 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357872 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388766 11/21/2014 123194 OWENS, NORMAN 233.44 ELECTION JUDGE 357873 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 233.44 388767 11/2112014 136108 PAULE, MARISA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357874 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES .-ELECTION 168.19 388768 11/21/2014 106631 PAULSON; DARLA J 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357875 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014 — 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388768 11/2112014 106631 PAULSON, DARLA J Continued... ' 143.81 ' 388769 11/21/2014 123196 PEARCE, WAIN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357876 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388770 11/2112014 136109 PERUSSE, CINDY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357877 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388771 11121/2014 134688 PFANNENSTEIN, RONALD 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357878 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388772 11/21/2014 104666 POLLITT, BETTY 168.19 'ELECTION JUDGE 357879 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388773 11121/2014 136110 RAMESH, SID 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357880 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388774 11121/2014 119667 RAZIDLO, TERESA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357881 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388776 11/2112014 136111 READY, JACK 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357882 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388776 11/21/2014 136112 REED, KAREN ° 164.29 ELECTION JUDGE 357883 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 164.29 388777 11/21/2014 130770 REHM, ERIC - 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 357884 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 - 388778 11/21/2014 129967 RISSER, JULIE 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357885 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 . Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388778 11121/2014 129967, KISSER, JULIE, Continued... 202.50 388779 11/2112014 135113 ROBINSON, CASEY 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357886 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388780 11121/2014 106275 RODGERS, JUDITH 194.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357887 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 194.06 388781 11121/2014. 127081 RODGERS, WILLIAM . 199.88 ELECTION JUDGE 357888 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 199.88 388782 11121/2014 106667 ROGERS, MARY 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357889 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388783 .11/21/2014 130771 ROSENTHAL- ERICKSON, LUANN 194.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357890 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 194.06 ' 388784 11121/2014 135114 ROTHBERG, HARRY 136.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357891 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.50 388785 11121/2014 130772 ROTHE,.CAROL 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357892 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 145.25 388786 11/21/2014 136115 ROWLAND, PETER - 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357893 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 " 388787 11/21/2014 135116 RURIK, LAUREN ` 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357894 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388788 11/21/2014 123637 RUSH, MILAGROS 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357895 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388788 11121/2014 123637 RUSH, MILAGROS V Continued... - 146.25 388789 11/2112014 123638 RUSH, WILLIAM 162.83 ELECTION JUDGE 357896 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 162.83 388790 11/21/2014 135117 RUWE, EMILY 141.38 .ELECTION JUDGE 357897 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 - 388791 11/2112014 136118, RYBERG, ALEX 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357898 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388792 11/21/2014 136119 SAKAGUCHI, KIRSTEN 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357899 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388793 11/2112014 135120 SAWATZKY, NOAH 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357900 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES " ELECTION 170.63 388794 11/21/2014 106687 SCHRAMM, CONS_ TANCE E. 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357901 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388795 11/2112014 131134 SCHREINER, AUNDRIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357902 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388796 11121/2014 134689. SCHULTZ, CAROL 151A3 ELECTION JUDGE 357903 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 388797 11/21/2014 116970 SCHWIEBERT, SARA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357904 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 " 388798 11121/2014 120264 SCOTT, AMY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357905 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388798 11121/2014 120264 SCOTT, AMY Continued... 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 27 Business Unit SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 388799 11/21/2014 ELECTION 131136 SEATON, HILORY ELECTION 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357906 111914 1180.6013 170.63 388800 11121/2014 127100 SEDOFF, MARILYN 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357907 111914 1180.6013 146.25 388801 11/21_/2014 136121 SEILER, SAMANTHA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357908 111914 1180.6013 163.31 - 388802 11/21/2014 106696 SELID, MARION P. 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357909 111914 1180.6013 141.38 388803 11/2112014 136079 SERGENT- LEVENTAL, EZRA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357910 111914 1180.6013 173.06 388804 11/21/2014 136080 SIMS, FLOY' 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357911 111914 1180.6013 170.63 388806 11/2112014 136081 SJOLANDER, CAMERON 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357912 111914 1180.6013 165.75 388806 .11/21/2014 124803 SKELLY, MICHAEL 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357913 111914 1180.6013 173.06 388807 11/21/2014 123204 SKOY, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357914 111914 1180.6013 170.63 388808 11/21/2014 133176 SMITH, DEL 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357915 111914 1180.6013 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 27 Business Unit SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 1 ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 388808 1112112014 133176 SMITH, DEL Continued... 202.50 111914 388809 11/2112014 ELECTION 136082 SMITH, JUDY 111914 1180.6013 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357918 111914 170.63 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 388810 11121/2014 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 210.94 357920 388811 11/21/2014 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136083 SMOLUND, ANSEL 357921 111914 129.19 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 357922 129.19 1180.6013 - 368812 11121/2014 357923 1,36084 SPECKHALS DUANE, LY 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 111914 1180.6013 168.19 ELECTION 388813 11/2112014 1180.6013 134691 STANTON, MARY ELECTION 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 141.38 388814 11/21/2014 123208 STEBLAY, VMAN 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 175.50 388816 1112112014 136085 STEVENIN, SOFIA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 165.75 388816 11/21/2014 131137 STONE, JAN 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 163.31 388817 .11/21/2014 123209 SWANSON, ANN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 170.63 388818 11/2112014 136086 SWANSON, ISABELLA 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/2112014- 11/27/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 357916. 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357917 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357918 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION NN 357919 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357920 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357921 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357922 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357923 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357924 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 357925 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014 - 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388818 11121/2014 136086 SWANSON, ISABELLA Continued... 165.75 388819 11/21/2014 123210 SWEET, PHILOTHEA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357926 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388820 11/21/2014 135087 SWENSON, ISAAC 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357927 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 38882.1 11/2112014 136088 SWOAP, ANJA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357928 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388822 11/21/2014 108593 THOMPSON, ANN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357929 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 176.63 388823 11121/2014 136089 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357930 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388824 11121/2014 112764 THORNDYKE, KATY 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 357931 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 388825 11/2112014 116976 TIGGAS, ANDREA 205.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357932 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 205.31 388826 11/2112014 123211 TREMMEL, DONNA 173.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357933 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 173.06 388827 11/2112014 136090 TRUCKENMILLER, DAVID 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357934 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388828 11/21/2014 123646 TURNBULL,.JULIE 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357935 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388828 11121/2014 123646 TURNBULL, JULIE _ Continued... 141.38 388829 11/21/2014 106629 ULVIN, JANET M 236.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357936 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 236.25 388830 11/21/2014 136091 WAGNER, CHRISTINA 170.63 -,ELECTION JUDGE 357937 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388831 11/21/2014 129679 WALDIN, DEB 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 357938 111914. 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 388832 11121/2014 130776 WALLANDER, DONNA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357939 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388833 11/21/2014 106086 WANDREI, LINDA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357940 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388834 1112112014 116981 WEBER, JENNY 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357941 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 388835 11121/2014 135092 WEBERT, KATIE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357942 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION - 170.63 388836 11121/2014 123212 WEHRMEISTER, PAUL 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357943 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 388837 11121/2014 136093 WEINERT, KATRINA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357944 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 388838 11121/2014 134692 WEISER, JOHN 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 367946 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 _ Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388838 11121/2014 134692 WEISER, JOHN Continued... 141.38 388839 1112112014 108698 WELBAUM, MIKE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357946 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388840 11/2112014 136094 WELDON, EMMA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE - 357947 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388841 11121/2014 130777 WENGER, WAYNE 202.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357948 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 202.50 388842 1112112014 104630 WEXLER, ARDIS 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357949 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 166.19 388843 1112112014 136096 WHITE, GRACE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 357950 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 388844 11121/2014 136096 WILLIAMS, AMANDA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357951 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 388846 11/21/2014 116983 WILLIAMS, PATRICIA 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 357952 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 _ 388846 11121/2014 .136097 WIMBLEY, REGINALD 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE - 357953 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 388847 11/2112014 136098 WITOWSKI, GERALD 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357954 111914 1180.6013_ SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.36 388848 1112112014 123217 WOXLAND, KATHRYN 239.06 ELECTION JUDGE 357955 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11121/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388848 .11/21/2014 123217 WOXLAND, KATHRYN Continued... 239.06 388849 11/2112014 104634 YEE, MARY 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 32 Business Unit 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 357956 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 213.75 388850 11/21/2014 111696 ZVERINOVA, MARGARET 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 357957 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION STREET NAME SIGNS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 74.88 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 358016 111814 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.88 388857 11/27/2014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 49.70 SPRINKLER HEAD 163.31 64658 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 63.92 388861 11/27/2014 66418 108767 3D SPECIALTIES GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 93.84 SPRINKLER FITTINGS 00001984 358186 68282 573.24 SURFACE MOUNT 00001951 358180 447087 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 68735 5511.6136 573.24 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 342.46 388852 11/27/2014 105076 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 932.22 SPRINKLER REPAIR 358182 33922 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 932.22 388863 11/27/2014 106476 ACE TRAILER SALES 1,265.00 SOT TRAILER REPAIRS 358183 31624 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,265.00 388864 11127/2014 136210 AGI ELECTRIC LLC 33,964.40 50TH REMODEL 358353 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS 33,964.40 388865 11/2712014 136212 ALWAYS TILE & STONE LLC 3,895.00 50TH REMODEL 358362 APPL 0001 5800.1720 BUILDINGS 3,895.00 388856 11/27/2014 134641 ANDERSON, CHAD STREET NAME SIGNS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 74.88 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 358016 111814 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.88 388857 11/27/2014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 49.70 SPRINKLER HEAD 358185 64658 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 63.92 - IRRIGATION PARTS 00001757 358184 66418 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 93.84 SPRINKLER FITTINGS 00001984 358186 68282 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 135.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 357638 68735 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 342.46 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388867 11/27/2014 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING Continued... 388858 11/2712014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,414.45 358268 3006287 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,702.00 358269 3006288 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3;116.45 388859 1112712014 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 2.34 CONTROL BRACKET 00001060 358114 10139987 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.34 388860 1112712014 133689 AUER STEEL 268.83 PILOT IGNITION KIT 00001057 358115 4867751 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 268.83 3888. 61 11/2712014 123795 AXEL H OHMAN CO 32,917.50 50TH REMODEL 358354 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32,917.50 388862 1112712014 100641 BALDWIN SUPPLY COMPANY 458.62 RINK MATS 00001978 357640 3178636 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 458.62 . 388863 1112712014 134026 BAUERBUILTTIRE 1,066.94 TIRES 358019 180149467 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,066.94 388864 1112712014 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 3,957.30 PROTECTIVE NETTING 357641 46-120 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 3,957.30 388865 11127/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 216.00 PIZZA 357642 D28IN2826 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 216.00 388866 11/2712014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 363.85 COFFEE 357643 1210181 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 363.85 388867 11/27/2014 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 2,688.00 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 358022 23418 47065.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 388867 11/2712014 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. Continued... 6,750.00 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 358022 23418 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE"PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 9,438.00 388868 1112712014 124634 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC ` 219,574.45 50TH & FRANCE IMPROVEMENTS 357644 P -23 #5 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYF.INDING 219,574.45 388869 1112712014 124634 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 1,987.50 STONE WALL REPAIR 00001248 358188 511 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 1,987.50 388870 1112712014 102646 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 18,830.50; DEC 2014 PREMIUM 358163 LOG10- DEC2014 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 178,557.00 DEC 2014 PREMIUM 358163 LOG10- DEC2014 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 197,387.50 388871 11/2712014, 133045 BLUHM, RANDY D. 475.00 COURSE FEE 358023 111814 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 475.00 388872 11127/2014 134928 BOSSARDT CORPORATION 7,000.00 50TH STORE REMODEL 358191 20285 5820.6103 PROF ESSIONALSERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 17,127.35 50TH STORE REMODEL 358190 20292 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 24,127.35 388873 1112712014 105367. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,005.97 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003842 358192 81603644 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 123.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003842 358193 81603645 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,129.87 388874 11/27/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 72600 358275 123330 • 5862.5513 348.00 358276 123,358 5862.5513 1,074.00 388876 1112712014 135200 BRYANT, REX 50.00 SKATE WITH SANTA 357648 DEPOSIT 5501.4607 50.00 388876 1112712014 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 129923 CAWLEY CITY OF EDINA 25.07 NAME BADGES 358195 V258124 Council Check Register by GL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 25.07 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 388882 11/27/2014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11/21/2014 - 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388876 11/2712014 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 14561 -11/14 1628.6166 _ Continued... SENIOR CITIZENS 404.68 200.00. EP PERFORMANCE 12 14/2014 357649 111814 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 595.34 200.00 358173 14561 -11/14 1646.6186 HEAT 388877 11127/2014 116346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 14561 -11/14 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 33.71 251.11 INTERN PHOTO FRAMING 357982 020005779 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 42.00 251.11 358173 14561 -11/14 5422.6186 HEAT 388878 11/27/2014 135209 CAL'S MARKET & GARDEN CENTER 14561 -11/14 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 224.44 HAY BALES FOR TRAINING 00003504 358345 378844 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 224.44 358173 14561 -11/14 5761.6186 388879 1112712014 27.88 119456 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 358173 14561 -11/14 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 85.75 358005 00010826 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 6,159.20 358004 00010827 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 1,217.85 358003 449387 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7,462.80 .388880 11/27/2014 135206 CARVER, JONATHAN 33.36 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358174 5517 OAKLAWN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 35 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 388881 11127/2014 129923 CAWLEY 25.07 NAME BADGES 358195 V258124 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 25.07 388882 11/27/2014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 67.40 358173 14561 -11/14 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 195.86 358173 14561 -11/14 1628.6166 _ HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 404.68 358173 14561 -11/14 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 595.34 358173 14561 -11/14 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 416.10 358173 14561 -11/14 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 33.71 358173 14561 - 11/14 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 42.00 358173 14561 -11/14 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 239.01 358173 14561 -11/14 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 6,695.58 358173 14561 -11/14 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 222.03 358173 14561 -11/14 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 27.88 358173 14561 -11/14 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 32.84 358173 14561 -11/14 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 48.35 368173 14561 -11/14 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 388888 11/27/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Council Check Register by GL 4,802.59 00103426- 0345052006 358045 345052006 -11/14 1552.6189 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 388889 11/27/2014 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388882 1112712014 439.22 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 358082 0128591522 Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 605.10 146.87 358173 14561 -11/14 5921.6186 HEAT 388890 1112712014 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 227.85 358173 14561 -11/14 5913.6186 HEAT DEC. 2014 MAINTENANCE 357652 1,586.63 5841.6103 358173 14561 -11/14 5911.6186 HEAT 10,982.13 388883 11127/2014 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 2,948.95 357984 2943142 5720.6186 HEAT 85.10 357985 2943452 5311.6186 HEAT 3,034.05 388884 11/27/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 156.40 952285 -2951 357650 2951 -11/14 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 60.09 9529446522 357986 6522 -11/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 216.49 388886 11/27/2014' 103236 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 797.09 SW REGIONAL RESPONSE TRAINING 358121 2759 1400.6104 CONFERENCES.& SCHOOLS 797.09 388886 11/27/2014 103236 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 11/241201414:43:24 Page - 36 . Business Unit SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION WELL PUMPS.- EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 TRAINING 358196 2747 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 388887 11/2712014 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 350.00 CANON 30D CAMERA 358122 COM -0416 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 350.00 388888 11/27/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 4,802.59 00103426- 0345052006 358045 345052006 -11/14 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER 4,802.59 388889 11/27/2014 100692. COCA -COCA REFRESHMENTS 165.88 358081 0128021720 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 439.22 358082 0128591522 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 605.10 388890 1112712014 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 825.99 DEC. 2014 MAINTENANCE 357652 111814 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 825.99 CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # -Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388891 11/27/2014 120433 COMCAST Continued... 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 357987 177449- 10/14 5420.6188 TELEPHONE BLACKTOP GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 11124/201414:43:24 Page- 37 Business Unit a.wo fIVVJG STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS 91.41 GEN' TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 388892 1112712014 EQUIPMENT OPERATION 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,326.42 HOT MIX 358197 111514 1314.6518 ' 5,326.42 ,. 388893 1112712014 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 355.25 16' RADIUS FORMS 00001850 358198 0119190 -IN 1314.6406 355.25 388894 11/27/2014 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 114.12 HOSEASSEMBLY 358153 77032 1553.6530 114.12 388896 1112712014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 77.22 ADJUSTABLE WRENCH 00005796 358125 951500 1553.6556 32.70 SCREWDRIVER SET 00005803 358124 953944 1553.6556 182.76 TOOLS 00005806 358123 954158 1553.6556 538.00 IMPACTTOOL 00005807 358200 954188 1553.6556 830.68 388896 11/27/2014 136122 DETLOFF MANAGEMENT INC. 21.05 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358154 6330 XERXES AVE 5900.2015 S 21.05 388897 11/2712014 100671 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 742.00 ROAD PAINT 00001861 358201 802155860 1335.6532 742.00 388898 1112712014 121103 DIRECTV 52.35 CABLE TV 358177 24471441486 7411.6406 52.35 388899 11/27/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 2,362.05 EDITION EDINA 358126 158229 1130.6575 49.08 AERATION NOTICE 357990 161321 .1185.6120 49.08 AERATION NOTICE 357989 161322 1185.6120 58.52 PUBLISH NOTICE 357988 161323 1185.6120 BLACKTOP GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 11124/201414:43:24 Page- 37 Business Unit a.wo fIVVJG STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN' TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PSTF OCCUPANCY COMMUNICATIONS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014 - 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388899 11/27/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. Continued... 2,518.73 388900 1112712014 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 17.21 CLAMPS, DRIVE 00001089 358127 11391700 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.21 388901 11/27/2014 101666 EDINA CHORALE 400.00 AD FOR CONCERTS 358128 EDINAART 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTER 400.00 388902 11/2712014 118010 EGAN, BILL 875.00 BEAVER REMOVAL 00001096 358202 111414 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 875.00 388903 11/2712014 136208 ESCAPE FIRE 330.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 358203 13619 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 225.00 358204 13620 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 555.00 388904 11/27/2014 134661 ESP IT 3,280.00 IT CONSULTING 358129 10229 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,280.00 388906 11/27/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 142.44 BRAKE SHOE KIT 358130 6- 1385138 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 24.71 RESISTOR ASSEMBLY 358047 69- 157661 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8.02 RAD PRESS CAP 358046 69- 157701 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8.02 RAD PRESS CAP- 358048 69- 158232 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 66.94 BATTERY 358205 69- 158604 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 84.09 BRANDED FRICTION, ROTOR 356206 69- 158618 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 169.42 DRUMS 358131 69- 158683 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 503.64 388906 11/2712014 134984 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS LLC 6,500.00 BLACKTOP REPAIRS 00001094 358207 29845 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 5,000.00 INFRARED PATCH 358209 29846 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 1,500.00 INFRARED PATCH 358210 29847 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 1,000.00 BLACKTOP REPAIRS 00001094 358208 29848 5913.6518 BLACKTOP - 500.00 INFRARED PATCHES 358132 29849 1314.6518 - BLACKTOP i 11/24/201414:43:24 Page 38 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN- - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION STREET RENOVATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 _, CITY OF EDINA 11/241201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page - 39 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388906 11/27/2014 134984 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS LLC Continued... 14,500.00 388907 11/27/2014 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 512.55 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357654 3501258 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 524.88 CONCESSION PRODUCT 357656 3533081 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 20.45- CREDIT 357655 91976 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,016.98 388908 1112712014 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 88.11 BOLTS AND HARDWARE 358211 MNTC2127057 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 88.11 388909 1112712014 130830 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP. 505.00 LIGHTBAR 00005776 357657 5897657 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 505.00 388910 11127/2014 136203 FEHLAND, WAYNE 64.19 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358133 5308 WHITING 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 64.19 388911 .11/27/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 45.39 CS TOPS 00001367 357659 0089945 -2 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 153.31 CS RODS 00001887 357658 0112823 -1 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,413.86 METERS, DIALS 00001088 358049 0119068 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 1,032.17 CS PARTS 00001082 357660 0119103 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,475.24 METER PARTS 00001095 358212 0119846 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR .8,119.97 388912 11/27/2014_ 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 1,250.00 CLEAN RAMP WINDOWS 358050 110314 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,275.00 CLEAN SKYLIGHTS 358051 110614 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 2,525.00 388913 11/2712014 130699 FLEETPRIDE 103.81 END YOKES, U- JOINTS 00005779 357661 64808634 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.81 388914 1112712014 134486 FLINT TRADING INC. 60.68 HOSE SWIVEL CONNECTOR 368213 176839 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 40 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388914 11/27/2014 134486 FLINT TRADING INC. Continued... 60.68 388916 11127/2014 102727 FORCE AMERICA 80.28 HARNESS 00005800 358214 01436504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN 80.28 388916 11/2712014 135205 GEIGER, ALEXANDRA 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 358136 111814 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 388917 11/2712014 101103 GRAIN_ GER 431.04 GLOVES 00005735 358135 9594797533 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 65.84 SMALL ENGINE FUEL 00005805 358134 9596104860 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 496.88 388918 11/2712014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,169.00 358009 174315 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 5,243.50 358277 174402 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,412.50 388919 11127/2014 136211 GREAT NORTHERN PAINTING 1,567.50 50TH REMODEL 358361 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,567.50 388920 11127/2014 133196 HANRAHAN, LIAM 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 358137 111814 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 388921 11127/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,628.39 DEC 2014 LTD 358164 6951447 -9 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,628.39 388922 1112712014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNT_ S 100.30 DEC 2014 PREMIUM 358165 6938443 -6 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 4,004.52 DEC 2014 PREMIUM 358165 6938443 -6 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 4,104.82 388923 11127/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,538.69 CHEMICALS 00001246 358052 3665984 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,538.69 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 11/27/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS CITY OF EDINA 390.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Council Check Register by GL 111814 390.32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 388928 11/2712014 100809 HOSE /CONVEYORS INC. 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No " Account No Subledger Account Description 388923 11127/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. Continued... 388924 11/27/2014 11/27/2014 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 140:00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 358346 155114 - 1130.6575 PRINTING 140.00 237.00 358278 24487 388926 11/27/2014 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY 388930 168.00 MONITOR 00004422 357991 55086282 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 168.00 MONITOR 00004422 357991 55086282 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 336.00 371.51 388926 1112712014 11/27/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 119808 INTEGRA 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 41 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,961.00 358010 733588 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 84.00 358086 733589 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING. 358011 733598 358085 733781 388927 11/27/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 390.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358138 111814 390.32 388928 11/2712014 100809 HOSE /CONVEYORS INC. 675.00 RINK MATS 00001045 358053 00049043 675.00 388929 11/27/2014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 900.00 358087 24466 237.00 358278 24487 1,137.00 388930 11/27/2014 129619 INGERSOLL -RAND COMPANY 371.51 INSTALL SWITCH 358054 30418882 371.51 388931 11/27/2014 119808 INTEGRA 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 1648.6406 5842.5514 5862.5514 1553.6530 27.74 ISP BUNDLE 358176 12512232 7411.6406 27.74 388932 1112712014 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 106.07 358217 11 /14- STREETS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 388932 11127/2014 100829 JERRYS HARDWARE 106.07 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 42 Business Unit 388933 11/27/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,175.65 358281 2286721 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 205.60 358088 2286722 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,835.62 358279 2286726 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 35.10 358280 2286727 5842.5515 -COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14,251.97 388934 1112712014 103216 JOHN E. REID & ASSOCIATES INC. 15,775.00 INTERROGATION PRESENTATIONS 358179 154085 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATIO N 15,775.00 388935 11/27/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 228.44 358012 5025450 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 221.14 358293 5030888 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. 50TH ST SELLING 2.32 358289 5030889 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 315.14. 358292 5030890 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 534.43 358291 5030892 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 488.12 358301 5030893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,940.88 358287 5030894 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,982.81 358290 5030895 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3.48 358298 5030898 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 66.82 358294 5030900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,435.96 358286 5030901 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,294.12 358300 5030905 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,402.92 358299 5030908 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,086.76 358302 5030909 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,759.96 358297 5030910 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,069.59 358296 5030911 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.41 358295 5030912 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,061.60 358288 5030913 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,658.58 358285 5030914 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,284.74 358283 5030915 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,512.10 358284 5030918 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,498.11 358282 5030919 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9.09- 358303 503543 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.50- 358304 504339 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 39,862.84 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/261414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Pager 43 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # "Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388936 11/27/2014 130789 KATZ, DAVID Continued... 79.00 HOMETOWN HERO ARTICLE 357992 176 -11/14 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 79.00 388937 11/27/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 81.99 UNIFORMS 00003880 358218 261114 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.99 388938 11127/2014 106606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 18,810.00 50TH REMODEL 358355 APPL 01 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,810.00 388939 11/27/2014 129942 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 344.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 356155 111614 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 344.18 388940 11/2712014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 TOW FEES 358139 112014 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 180.56 TOW FEES 356139 112014 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 334.30 388941 11127/2014 102403 LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE LLC 31.50 SOD 358056 6897 1644.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT TREES & MAINTENANCE 31.50 t 388942 11127/2014 113676 LAMETTI & SONS INC. 506,932.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 358352 111214 03485.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TRUNK SS LINING 506,932.35 388943 1112712014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 261.53 HEX CAPS, SCREWS 00001964 358221 9302836093 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 53.84 FLAT WASHERS 00001964 358220 9302843586 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 290.17 WASHERS, HEX CAPS 00001988 358222 9302847622 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 276.94 BATTERY CABLE, PINS, SEALS 00005839 358057 9302869223 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.61 LUBRICANT 00005839 358059 9302875395 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,193.40 HOSE 00005841 358058 9302877000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,288.40 NUTS, BOLTS, FITTINGS 00005843 358219 9302880374 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.37 WIRE ROPE CLIPS 00005802 358140 9302880375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 308.39 ROLL - WIPERS 00001069 358223 9302882200 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 3,780.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 44 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388944 11127/2014 120016 LOFTUS ORNAMENTAL IRON INC. Continued... 1,560.00 FENCING 358224 12014 -20212 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 1,560.00 388946 11127/2014 100868 LOGIS 380.00 358060 39130 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,342.00 358060 39130 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,500.00 358060 38130 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,492.00 358060 39130 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 3,861.00 358060 39130 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,657.00 358060 39130 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED'SERVICES 5,829.00 358060 39130 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,707.00 358060 39130 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 198.00 IT CONSULTING 358141 39212 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 346.50 PCI NETWORK CHANGES 358141 39212 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 29,312.50 388946 11/27/2014 126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 101.47 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 357993 111814 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 101.47 388947 11/27/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 104,790.00 TRACKLESS SIDEWALK MACHINE 00005171 358142 1140375 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 371.56- CREDIT 358156 9686 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104,418.44 388948 11127/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11,660.73 UNLEADED FUEL 357664 23818 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,567.20 DIESEL FUEL 357663 23819 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24,227.93 388949 11/2712014 116228 MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN 162.18 ROOM CHARGES 358225 5656800005103 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 162.18 388960 11/27/2014 120924 MASTER MECHANICAL INC. 325.00 MUAREPAIR 00001084 358061 41060 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 325.00 388951 11127/2014 112360 MAY, DOUG 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 358158 111814 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 388961 11/2712014 112360 MAY, DOUG Continued... CUSTOMER REFUND 11/24/201414:43:24 Page- 45 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES PRINTING PLANNING CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 100.00 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 388962 11/2712014 ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 136202 MCCARTHY, DAVID 187.11 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358143 6216 IDYLWOOD 5900.2015 LANE 187.11 388963 11/27/2014 100886 METRO SALES INC 250.00 ELECTION RENTAL COPIER 357667 INV107519 1180.6151 13.33 DELIVER TONER 358144 INV120825 1550.6230 263.33 388954 11/2712014 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 57.00 OFFICIATING FEES 357994 4626 1621.6103 57.00 388956 11127/2014 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 172.64 WOODDALE POSTCARD 358348 73841 1140.6575 172.64 388966 11/27/2014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,385.00 RESTORED WATER SUPPLY 00001092 358244 34841 5921.6180 795.00 REPLACE STAND PIPE 00001093 358243 34842 5913.6180 3,180.00 388967 11/27/2014 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAND 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/07/14 357668 111814 5710.6136 150.00 388968 11/2712014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 357669 928030966 5841.6180 16.09 WINDOW CLEANING 357670 928030967 5861.6180 37.47 388959 11/2712014 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,148.00 CONNECTION FEE Q4 358159 1270011 EDINA 5915.6136 22,148.00 388960 11/2712014 101469 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 1,155.00 SOFTBALL REGISTRAITON 357995 8344 1621.6406 CUSTOMER REFUND 11/24/201414:43:24 Page- 45 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES PRINTING PLANNING CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 46 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388960 11127/2014 LEVY# 16548 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 101469 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 16548.1232 Continued... 91 1,155.00 388968 1112712014 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 388961 11/2712014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 358166 W14100650 1646.6188 24.69 358166 51.00 POSTCARDS 358064 16637 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 74.07 51.00 W14100650 1481.6188 75.42 358166 W14100650 388962 11/27/2014 101796 MPCA W14100650 1646.6188 222.21 358166 W14100650 1622.6188 2,562.50 PROMENADE CLEANUP (VIC) 358063 7700007979 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,562.50 388963 11/2712014 102084 NATIONAL FIRE SPRINKLER ASSOCIATION 220.00 TRAINING 00003501 358245 200003628 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 220.00 388964 1112712014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 780.00 358089 95345 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 547.50 358305 95346 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,327.50 388966 11127/2014 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 21.60 FIREARMS TRAINING BOOKS 358178 7041 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 21.60 388966 11/27/2014 - 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,252.20 TRAFFIC SIGNS 00001846 358246 TI- 0279367 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,252.20 BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE 388967 11/27/2014 124866 OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC YORK FIRE STATION TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 346.51 LEVY# 16548 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358248 05- 116- 21 -22 -00 16548.1232 91 346.51 388968 1112712014 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 24.69 358166 W14100650 1646.6188 24.69 358166 W14100650 1554.6188 49.38 358166 W14100650 1646.6188 74.07 358166 W14100650 1481.6188 75.42 358166 W14100650 1554.6188 172.83 358166 W14100650 1646.6188 222.21 358166 W14100650 1622.6188 SP ASSESS RE DEFERRED NINE MILE VILLAGE WATERMAIN TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. CITY OF EDINA 3,492.88 Council Check Register by GL 112614 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WARDEN AVE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 358351 112614 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 11/21/2014 — 11127/2014 Check # Date Amount --Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 388968 11/27/2014 358351 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 05538.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 89,410.20 49.38 358351 358166 W14100650 5111.6188 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 24.69 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358166 W14100650 5311.6188 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 98.76 191,505.65 358166 W14100650 5410.6188 111.10 358166 W14100650 5710.6188 111.11 358166 W14100650 5760.6188 358090 49.38 5842.5513 358166 W14100650 5821.6188 1,384.37 74.07 8475198 -IN 358166 W14100650 5841.6188 VERNON SELLING 4,255.98 74.07 358166 W14100650 5861.6188 49.38 119008 PCI ROADS LLC 358166 W14100650 5913.6188 260.70 841.74 358167 W14100655 5420.6188 103114 -NO. 10099.1705.30 1,545.93 BR9 GUS YOUNG BRIDGE REHAB 388969 11/2712014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 9,679.95 FINAL PAYMENT 358065 146.22 GLOVES 00001078 358249 550244 5913.6406 146.22 13-18 388970 11/2712014 122629 ONCE UPON A STAR 1,122.00 PARTY FEE 357672 EDINAP /R11/7/14 1600.4390.47 1,122.00 Subledger Account Description Continued... TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE' TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERALSUPPLIES ONCE UPON A STAR PARTIES 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 47 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT POOL OPERATION . GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE DISTRIBUTION PARKADMIN. GENERAL 388971 11/2712014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 3,492.88 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358351 112614 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WARDEN AVE 6,224.52 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358351 112614 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 70,397.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358351 112614 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 20,699.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358351 112614 05538.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 89,410.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358351 112614 03480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 1,281.08 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 358351 112614 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAWKES NHOOD RECON 191,505.65 388972 11127/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 2,871.61 358090 8475167 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,384.37 358091 8475198 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,255.98 388973 11127/2014 119008 PCI ROADS LLC 841.74 FINAL PAYMENT 358065 103114 -NO. 10099.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BR9 GUS YOUNG BRIDGE REHAB 13 -18 9,679.95 FINAL PAYMENT 358065 103114 -NO. 10098.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS -BR8 78TH STREET BRIDGE REHAB 13-18 10,521.69 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 388973 11/27/2014 119008 PCI ROADS LLC 388974 11/27/2014 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 131163 PECK, RANDY 275.00 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA 358066 275.00 01398.1705.21 388976 11/27/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 319.50 388977 11/27/2014 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. by GL Council Check Register by Invoice'& Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 357673: DEC 6, 2014 1600.4390.56 358092 45408232 357674 46816830 5862.5515 5520.5510 1,493.67 388976 11127/2014 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 4,020.00 SOD REPAIR 358066 242 01398.1705.21 4,020.00 388977 11/27/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 5.80 358093 2690704 5842.5515 328.48 358013 2697749 5862.5512 181.67 358308 2701329 5842.5513 .39 358313 2701331 5862.5513 1,529.40 358306 2701335 5842.5513 1.74 358315 2701336 5862.5512 3,103.59 358309 2701338 5842.5513 2,507.53 358311 2701340 5842.5513 3,147.53 358312 2701341 5862.5513 2,384.12 358314 2701342 5862.5512 3,003.32 358307 2701343 5862.5513 54.16 358316 2701344 5862.5515 38.33 358310 2701548 5842.5513 16,286.06 388978 11/2712014 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 2,115.13 BRINE FILLER 358251 240569 1301.6519 Subledger Account Description Continu6d... BREAKFAST WITH SANTA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 48 Business Unit PARKADMIN. GENERAL VERNON SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS CONSULTING INSPECTION LAKE EDINA B COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ROAD OIL 2,115.13 388979 11/27/2014 100966 PIPE SERVICES CORP 13,555.67 SANITARY SEWER TELEVISING 00001087 357675 2007729 5920.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 13,555.67 388980 1112712014 102728, PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO. 2,413.69 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00001079 358252 1613 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE SEWER CLEANING TREES & MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 49 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388980 11127/2014 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO. Continued... 2,413.69 388981 11127/2014 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 812.50 NITRILE GLOVES 358067 54470 - 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 812.50 388982 11/27/2014 122470 RTL CONSTRUCTION INC. 21,204.00 50TH REMODEL 358356 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21,204.00 388983 11/27/2014 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 895.00 OSHATRAINING 357679 110714 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 895.00 388984 11/2712014 117099 SAFETY SIGNS 3,540.00 FOG LINE REMOVAL 358068 14203948. 01413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON 3,540.00 388986 11/27/2014 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 203.62 COFFEE MUGS 357996 SH4253 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 203.62 388986 1112712014 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 358254 INV-18636 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 772.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 358253 INV- 18767 -2014 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 822.00 388987 1112712014 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 72.82 REAR VIEW MIRROR 00005781 358069 P59906 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.82 388988 1112712014 100996 SEH 1,391.73 INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 358070 289618 08060.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 1,299.88 54TH ST BID DOCS AND CPS 358071 289680 01416.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR 44,976.43 ARDEN PARK RECON DESIGN 358256 289682 01412.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON' 322.15 ANTENNA PROJECTS 358255 290008 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 47,990.19 388989 11/2712014 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 TRASH ROOM FLOOR CLEANING 358267 49817 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 358319 1224970 5842.5512 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 1,527.50 358096 1225489 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by GL 358097 1226126 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1226129 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description 388989 11/27/2014 101106 SERVICEMASTER Continued... 1,650.00 _ 388990 11127/2014 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 56.94 WHITE PAINT 00001923 358259 6527 -9 1325.6532 PAINT 227.76 WHITE PAINT 00001052 358258 6914 -9 1325.6532 PAINT 284.70 " 388991 11127/2014 116533 SHRM 185.00 MEMBERSHIP- LISA SCHAEFER 358161 9005920424 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 185.00 388992 11/27/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 125.00 SIGNS 358260 8310 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.00 MONTHLY SPECIALS SIGNS 358162 8428 5822.6575 PRINTING 60.00 MONTHLY SPECIALS SIGNS 358162 8428 5842.6575 PRINTING 60.00 MONTHLY SPECIALS SIGNS 358162 8428 5862.6575 PRINTING 2,695.00 ICE LOGOS 357680 8433 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES, 48.00 GIFT CARD SIGNS 358261 8490 5822.6575 PRINTING 48.00 GIFT CARD SIGNS 358261 8490 5842.6575 PRINTING 48.00 GIFT CARD SIGNS 358261 8490 5862.6575 PRINTING 3,144.00 388993 11/27/2014 131886 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 57.82 HOT DOG BUNS 357681 253000 . 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 54.83 HOT DOG BUNS 357682 253858 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 112.65 r 388994 11/27/2014 136207 SKRENTNER, ROBERT 131.05 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358175 5551 VILLAGE DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 131.05 388996 11/27/2014 127940 SMT HEALTH SYSTEMS 229.36 HARNESS 00003503 358216 44051 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 229.36 388996 11/27/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 50 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS HUMAN RESOURCES STREET NAME SIGNS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING` VERNON SELLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL _ 3.00 358319 1224970 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,527.50 358096 1225489 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING ,. 532.50 358097 1226126 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ' 5,392.98 368098 1226129 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 51 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 388996 11/2712014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 8,218.70 358318 1226130 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,663.61 358320 1226131 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,796.50 358095 1226132 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,401.20 358094 1226133 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 373.75 358317 1227598 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 28,909.74 388997 11/27/2014 108553 SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING INC. 13,560.00 PLUMBING WORK @ UTLEY PK 00001924 358262 5754 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 13,560.00 388998 11127/2014 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 600.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001090 358145 1445 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 60D.00 368999 1112712014 103265 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC 19,842.65 ,50TH REMODEL 358357 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19,842.65 389000 11/27/2014 134976 STANDARD SIDEWALK INC. 23,541.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 358349 112614 07119.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S119 YORKAVE SIDEWALK W SIDE 27,097.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 358349 112614 07118.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK 61,996.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 358349 112614 07123.1705.30 CONTRACTOR. PAYMENTS VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 112,634.85 389001 1112712014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 168.00 358321 4157 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 168.00 389002 1112712014 101016 STREICHERS 80.00 VEST 358072 11121089 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 389003 11127/2014 106874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 681.24 TIRES 00005774 357683 10129032 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 681.24 389004 11127/2014 121681 SUMMIT 1,902.85 50TH REMODEL 358358 1316910 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,902.85 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL . Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389004 11/27/2014 121681 SUMMIT Continued... 389006 11/2712014 122794. TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 455.80 SQUEEGEE KIT, BRUSHES, FILTER 00005801 358073 912704666 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - 455.80 389006 11/2712014 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 803.95 OCT 2014 SERVICES 358074 830654614 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 803.95 - 389007 .11/2712014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,683.63 358322 860630 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,683.63 389008 11/27/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. ' . 131.00 VETERANS MEMORIAL MEETING 357997 M20915 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 273.50 11/3/14 COUNCIL MEETING 357998 M20916 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 404.50 389009 1112712014 103218 TRISTATE BOBCAT 148.50 BOBCATAUGER RENTAL 00001597 358263 R21799 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 148.50 389010 1112712014 101127 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS INC. 4,436.50 50TH REMODEL 358359 APPL #1 5800.1720 BUILDINGS 4,436.50 389011 11/27/2014 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 1,168.56 STEEL DOOR, MORTISE LOCKS 00001818 358076 681105 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - 1,168.56 389012 11127/2014 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,421.78 EXPLORER UNIFORMS 358077 226051 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1,421.78 389013 1112712014 100668 URS CORPORATION 2,393.75 PROMENADE- PHASE 4 358078 6054753 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,393.75 389014 •11/27/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 129.62 TOWELS, SOAP 357686 328216 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11124/201414:43:24 Page- 52 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING PARKADMIN. GENERAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET, GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD RESERVE PROGRAM CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 53 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389014 1112712014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. Continued... 362.21 LIQUOR BAGS 357685 328218 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 216.36 LIQUOR BAGS 357687 328218 -01 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 94.82 CAN LINERS 00001048 357684 329623 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 803.01 389016 11/27/2014 116380 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC. 37.19 FREIGHT CHARGE 358147 IN060- 1003395 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 37.19 389016 11/27/2014 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 375.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 357688 SP001591 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 375.00 389017 11/27/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 866.96 WIRE 00001986 - 357691 8788727 1321.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 604.08 WELL REPAIR PARTS 00001044 357690 8804753 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 196.84 WELL REPAIR PARTS 00001044 357689 8805364 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 638.65. WELL REPAIR PARTS 00001051 357692 8814094 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 2,306.53 389018 11127/2014 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER - 30.06 SAFETY VEST 00002632 358079 3032510 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 30.06 389019 11/27/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 359.00 358113 62653 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 391.00 358328 62659 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 750.00 389020 11/27/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 79.08 LIGHTS 00001052 358264 15255863 -00 1646.6578 LAMPS 8 FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 80.40 LIGHT BULBS 00001066 358265' 15255864 -00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.48 389021 11/27/2014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 36.30 357695 7329 -2808 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 67.34 357695 7329 -2808 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 89.42 357695 7329 -2808 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 124.68 357695 7329 -2808 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 199.96 357695 7329 -2808 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 389021 11/27/2014 4,878.39 389022 11/27/2014 120352 WASTEQUIP 1,472.50 ROLLOFF DUMPSTER 00005662 358080 2144610 1301.6406 1,472.50 ROLLOFF DUMPSTER 00005662 358080 2144610 4090.6406 2,945.00 Subledger Account Description Continued... RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 54 Business Unit LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 389023 11/2712014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL LOCATE LEAK 00001085 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5510 5913.6180 11121/2014 - 11/27/2014 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 389024 1112712014 294.32 357695 7329 -2808 1645.6182 394.50 357695 7329 -2808 1645.6182 406.70 357695 7329 -2808 1301.6182 406.70 357695 7329 -2808 1552.6182 47.34 357695 7329 -2808 5111.6182 55.34 357695 7329 -2808 5210.6182 110.46 357695 7329 -2808 5430.6182 257.25 357695 7329 -2808 5420.6182 321.93 357695 7329 -2808 5422.6182 967.58 357695 7329 -2808 5511.6182 945.81 357695 7329 -2808 5720.6182 55.34 357695 7329 -2808 5861.6182 97.42 357695 7329 -2808 5841.6182 4,878.39 389022 11/27/2014 120352 WASTEQUIP 1,472.50 ROLLOFF DUMPSTER 00005662 358080 2144610 1301.6406 1,472.50 ROLLOFF DUMPSTER 00005662 358080 2144610 4090.6406 2,945.00 Subledger Account Description Continued... RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 54 Business Unit LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 389023 11/2712014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 283.60 LOCATE LEAK 00001085 357696 5510 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 283.60 389024 1112712014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 272.32 358331 7006662 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 109.16 358334 7006664 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,343.17 358332 7006666 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,620.36 358333 7006667 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,345.01 389025 11/27/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 153.76 358105 1080249878 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,335.89 358338 1080251772 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,062.24 358337 1080253047 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 309.75 358102 1080254593 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,296.30 358101 1080254644 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,923.07 358336 1080254645 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,437.52 358335 1080254647 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 160.07 358111 1080254650 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLIV- R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/24/201414:43:24 Council Check Register by GL Page- 55 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014- 11/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389025 11/27/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 2,700.92 358110 1080254651 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 45.15 358103 1080254652 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,643.10 358104 1080254653 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 131.13 358108 1080254674 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20,793.59 358106 1080254675 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 91.15 358107 1080254676 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,121.40 358109 1080254677 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 29.12- 358148 2080060547 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 50,175.92 389026 11/2712014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,954.50 358112 1090319237 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 246.00 358344 1090319238 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,827.45 358014 1090319915 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 46.20 358015 1090319916 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,559.43 358341 1090322454 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 432.00 358342 1090322455 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 231.00 358343 1090322456 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,266.95 358340 1090322459 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 555.00 358339 1090322460 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,118.53 389027 11/27/2014 136204 WOOLDRIDGE, MATTHEW 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 358149 111814 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 389028 11/27/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 29,030.87 51- 5605640 -1 358000 434396548 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 49.05 51- 5276505 -8 358150 434575279 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,351.65 51- 6227619 -3 357999 434590755 - 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 130.92 51- 0010025256 -3 357697 434644589 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 31,562.49 389029 11/27/2014 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 1,384.95 VEHICLE REPAIRS 358266 13004 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT_ OPERATION GEN 1,384.95 389030 11/27/2014 133181 ZIMMER, JACK 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 358151 111814 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 389030 11/27/2014 133181 ZIMMER, JACK 2,518,169.45 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/2014— 11/27/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... Payment Instrument Totals Checks 2,122,697.26 A/P ACH Payment 395,472.19 Total Payments 2,518,169.45 11/24/201414:43:24 Page - 56 Business Unit R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 11/21/2014 - 11/27/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 406,028.09 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 334.30 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 134,777.66 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 561,518.92 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 170,562.98 -05100 ART CENTER FUND 912.82 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 55.34 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 109.79 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,801.73 - 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 23,784.22 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 6,413.00 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 4,355.86 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,849.72 05800 LIQUOR FUND 399,626.61 05900 UTILITY FUND 766,233.98 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 9,338.58 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 15,876.69. 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 4,956.25 09900 PAYROLL FUND 7,632.91 Report Totals 2,518,169.45 11124/201414:43:37 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge_ and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing- policies a d procedures date z 7 y To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. C. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action M Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -147 Approving Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees For 2015 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 -147 Approving Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2015. Information / Background: Attached is Resolution 2014 -147 Approving Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2015. The ambulance fees as presented by the Fire Department reflect minor changes to primarily address cost of living increase. No significant changes are recommended this year. The fees that are proposed to change from 2014 to 2015 are in bold. Attachment: Resolution No. 2014 -147 Approving Ambulance & Miscellaneous Fire Fees For 2015. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2014 - 147 SETTING AMBULANCE AND MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES FOR 2015 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service and miscellaneous fire fees for 2015. AMBULANCE FEES. Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation to a medical facility: Level 1 = ON SCENE TREATMENT Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport in ALS TREATMENT — NO TRANSPORT Admin. Of One or more medications with no transport $395.00 $450.00 Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) BASIC LIFE SUPPORT Vital Signs; Splinting, Banda in $1,445.00 $1,550.00 Level 3 - MODERATE CARE ALS -1 ALS Assessment, 02, IV, Nitroglycerin Translingual Spray, ASA, Nitrous Oxide, 3 -12 Lead EKG Monitoring, Spine Immobilization, Ultrasound, Glucose. Monitoring, CO Monitoring, 02 Monitoring $1,445.00 $1,550.00 Level 4 - MAJOR CARE ALS -2 ALS Assessment and any of the following: 3 or more Medications Cardiac Pacing Cardioversion Defibrillation Intraosseous Infusions Surgical; Airway Management Chest Decompression Endotracheal Intubation Central Venous Line, End -Tidal CO2 Monitoring PCT (inflated) Cardio/Pulmonary Resuscitation CPR $1,725.00 $1,775.00 RESPONSE TO SCENE AND NO TREATMENT No Charge No Charge OR TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION Included in above Included in above MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $21.00 /mile $22.00 /mile REPORT / RECOMMENDATION ADDITIONAL STAFFING OR MECHANICAL EXTRICATION VEHICLE DECONTAMINATION $640.00 /hour 1 hour minimum $880.00 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES for 2015 $660.00 1 hour minimum $900.00 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following miscellaneous fees for 2015- Page 3 SPECIALIZED. RESPONSE . 1014 2015 . Engine/Fire Company* $500.00 $515.00 Ladder Company* $660.00 $679.80 HazMat Unit* $730.00 $751.90 Special Operations Team* $920.00 $947.60 Limited Response* $250.00 $257.50 Gas Line Rupture Response* $430.00 $442.90 Specialized Equipment* Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15 %' administrative ' charge Supplies or Additional Personnel Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge .Disposal Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Ambulance Standby* $220.00 $220.00 * Charges are per hour — one hour minimum Whereupon -said - resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 2nd day of December, 2014. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned, duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL O e t� Cn O Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -148 Approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 -148 approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees Information / Background: Attached is Resolution 2014- 148.Approving Park and Recreation fees for 2015. Park fees other than Art Center fees were approved by the Park Board. No changes to Art Center fees are proposed for 2015. However, the Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studio is closing at the end of 2014, and this closure is reflected in the according fee schedule. The fees that are proposed to change from 2014 to 2015 are in bold. Attachment: Resolution No. 2014 -148 Approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees City of Edina • -4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -148 APPROVING 2014 PARK AND RECREATION FEES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City. Council does hereby approve and set the following 2015 Park and Recreation Fees. Adult Tennis Instruction Youth Tennis Instruction Two D a Youth Tennis Instruction Three Youth Tennis Instruction Four D Pee Wee Tennis Team Tennis Tennis Cam Playground Fab 4&5 Small Wonders Safety Cam Super 64 7 'Ch6erleading Cam Highlands Explorers Playground Pros Travelin' Teens Pre - Creators Intro to Sports/Pre-Games Tiny Tot Sports Playground Creators Playground Performers Leaders in Training Fishing Clinic Barnvard Boogie Santa's Breakfast at Edinborou! Schools Out Garden Plot Rental Party Unit Soccer-Shots Cam Reach Education Solutions - Once Upon a Star Parties PARK AND RECREATION 2014, $52.00 s $52.00 Da s $71.00 a s $86.00 $38.00 $100.00 $104.00 $45.00 $95.00 $69.00 $35.00 $62.00 $50.00 $69.00 $75.00 $114.00 $95.00 $95.00 $95.00 $69.00 $69.00. $45.00 $10.00 2015 NA $38.00 $105.00 $104.00 $45.00 $95.00 $69.00 $35.00 $62.00 $50.00: $69.00 $75.00 $114.00 $95.'00 $95.00 $95.00 $69.00 $69.00 $45.00 $10.00 $5.00/ per person $5.00/ per person k $10.00 Members $15.00 /Non- Members $10.00 Members $15.00 /Non- Members $25.00 $25.00 $35.00 $35.00 Contracted Programs _ Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies Varies REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 ADULT ATHLETIC FEES SUMMER SOFTBALL LEAGUES BASKETBALL 2014 2015 '2014 2015 Men's League (formerly non- $490.00 $495.00 5 -Man C League $570.00 $575.00 resident team Resident Use /hour $50.00 $50.00 Per field = per day $139.00 Men's League - Resident $139.00 Resident Use/day 5-Man ,C League $140.00 Per field - per hour Discount Rate (formerly resident $430.00 $435.00 Resident Discount $510.00 $515.00 team $77.00 $77.00 Commercial use with light/hr $135.00 Co -Rec League (formerly non- 5 -Man B League $570.00 $575.00 resident team) $525.00 $535.00 Co -Rec League - Resident $11:00 5 -Man B League Van Valkenburg /Courtney Fields Residents Onl Gymnasium user fee/participant Discount Rate (formerly resident $465.00 $475.00 Resident Discount $510.00 $515.00 team 1 $11.00 1 $11.00 Rosland Park Pathway Residents "Onl Utle Park'Fire Ring Rental; (Residents Men's Double Header League Per Hour $75.00 1 HOCKEY (formerly non - resident team) $730.00 $735.00 Men's Double Header League - Resident Discount Rate $670.00 $675.00 4 -Man League $305.00 $305.00 (formerly resident team 4 -Man League Resident Discount $255.00 $255.00 VOLLEYBALL BROOMBALL Officiated Leagues $415.00 $415.00 Co -Rec League $370.00 $370.00 Officiated Leagues - Resident Co -Rec League Discount Rate $365.00 $365.00 Resident Discount $320.00 $320.00 CO -REC KICKBALL C -Rec Kickball $150.00 $150.00 Co -Rec League Resident Discount $125.00 $125.00 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS 2014 1 2015. 2014 2015 General Park Areas Athletic Fields Residents Only) Resident Use /hour $50.00 $50.00 Per field = per day $139.00 $139.00 Resident Use/day $140.00 $140.00 Per field - per hour $50.00 $50.00 Commercial Use (i.e. TV)/hr $80.00. $80.00 Per field - per hour w /li hts $77.00 $77.00 Commercial use with light/hr $135.00 $135.00 Showmobile/day $700.00 1 $700.00 Edina Athletic Associations. Field user fee/participant $11:00 $11.00 Van Valkenburg /Courtney Fields Residents Onl Gymnasium user fee/participant $11.00 $11.00 Per field /day includes building $165.00.. $165.00 Outdoor hockey rink user fee/participant 1 $11.00 1 $11.00 Rosland Park Pathway Residents "Onl Utle Park'Fire Ring Rental; (Residents Only) Per Hour $75.00 1 $75.00 Fire Ring - per day $28.00 $28.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Per Da � I 1 1 $225.00 1 x$225.00 Green Fees Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Non= Residents Per hou ;_.first hour $85:0.0 ''$95.00, Per hour, first hour $105.00 $105.00 Each add'I hour, 60 to 3 hrs $55.00 .. $55._00 Each.add'f hour up to 3 hrs $75.00 $75.00 . Per da 4 hours or more _$205.00. .,.,$205.00 Per-day (4 hours or more $270.00 $270.00 Arneson Acres Park/.Gazebo Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only Non- Residents Mi day 6:hrs or. less $85.00 $85.00 Y2 da 6 hrs or less $105.00 $105.00 Full day over,6hours +$120.00 $12.00 $120.00 Full day over 6 hours $155.00 $155.00 $25.00 Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Residents Arneson Acre_ s Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Non- Residents Per hour, first hour $120':00 .$120.00 Per hour, first hour $140.00 $140.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs .$60.00 $60:00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $70.00 $70.00 Per day 4 hours or more $250.00 $250.00 Per day 4 hours or-more $294.00 $294.00 Picnic Shelter Rentals - full day (Residents Only) Picnic Shelter Rentals - half day (Residents Onl . Chowen Park $44.00 $44.00 Chowen Park $28:00 $28.00 Sherwood.'Park $44.00 $44.00 Sherwood Park $28.00 $28.00 Wooddale -Park $44.00 $44.00 Wooddale Park $28.00 $28.00 Rosland Park $155.00 $155.00 Braemar.Park "` $44.00 NA Park Shelter Buildings Rentals - "full day Residents Only) Park Shelter Buildings Rentals -half -day Residents Only) Cornelia School Park $105.00 $105.00 Cornelia School Park $70.00 $70.00 Todd Park $105.00 $105.00 Todd Park $70.00 $70.00 Walnut Ridge Park $105.00 $105.00 Walnut Ridge Park $70.00 $70.00 Weber Parke $105.00 $105.00 Weber Park $70.00 $70.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 2014 2015 Green Fees 18 hole - non - patron" $39.00/$42.00* $39.00/$42.00* 18 hole - patron $31.00/$32.00* $31.00/$32.00* Senior -'patron (age 62 and older $29.00/$30.00* $29.00/$30.00* Senior - non-patron age 62 and older) $37.00/$39.00* $37.00/$39.00* 9 hole - non-patron $20.00/$21.00* $20.00/$21.00* 9 hole - patron _ $16.00/$17.00* $16.00/$17.00* Masters Senior Patrons age 75 and older $25.00/$27.00* $25.00/$27.00* College Age Rate $26.00/$30.00* $26.00/$30.00* Junior 18 Hole Rate $20.00 $20.00 Junior 9 Hole Rate $12.00 $12.00 GROUP FEES - 18 holes $49.00 $49.00 GROUP FEES - 9 holes $25.00 $25.00 Patron Cards Resident Patron Card before April 1 $75.00 $75.00 Resident Patron Card after March 30 $80.00 $80.00 Non - Resident Patron Card before April 1 $90.00 $90.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Non - Resident Patron Card after March 31 .$95.00 - $95.00..: Computerized Handicaps Resident "$27.00 $27.00 Non - Resident $32.00 $32.00 Lockers Junior :Men's 72 inch $40.00 $40.00 Men's'42 inch $30.00 $30.00 Ladies'72 inch $20.00 $20.00 Club Storage, $50.00 $50.00 Club Rental $25.00 $25.00 Push Carts - 9 Hole $5.00 $5.00 Push Carts -18 Hole $7.00 $7.00 Golf Cars 18 holes $31.00' $31.00 9: holes $19.00 $19.00 Group Car Fees $38.00 $38.00 Group _Golf Lessons Adult . ' $105.00 $105.00 Junior $50.00 $50:00 Braemar Room Resident - wedding related $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Non=residents - weddin related $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Other events $375.00/$1,200.00 $375.00/$1,200.00 Braemar Driving Range Large Bucket $7.75 $7.75 Small Bucket $5.25-,, $5.25 Warm-Up Bucket $3.00 $3.00, *Weekend rate Friday through Sunday. BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE 2014 2015 Green Fees Adult non-patron $15.50 $15.50 Adult patron $12.50 $12.50 Junior $10.00 $10.00 Junior - 10 Round Card $75.00 $75.00 Patron Cards Adults Only 18 and older $25.00 $25.00 Golf Cars Golf Cars eve one $15.00 $15.00 Pull Carts $3.00 $3.00 Group Fees $18.00 $18.00 Page 5 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION GOLF DOME, Large Bucket $9.00 $9.00 Senior Bucket $8.50. I i$TW,:' 1 $7.00 Time Golf 'h hour - $14'.00 $14.00 Hourly Field Rental $175.00 $175.00 Page 6 EDINBOROUGH PARK -2014 2015 Pool ,& Track`Qaily Admission Pool & Track Daily Passes Residents /Non - Residents). I i$TW,:' 1 $7.00 Pool ,,& Track 10,Admission,Pass Non - resident Pool & Track 10 admission pass residents /non - residents NA $60.00 Pool ,& TrackAnnual Membershi Edina Individual $260.00 $260.00 Each Additional Member ..$90:00 $90.00 Non -Edina Individual $290.00 $290.00 Each Additional Member $100.00 $'100.00 Locker Rental $0.25 Bir.thday,Par.ty Packs es /2'Hours Adventure Package $160.00 $160.00 Peak Package $100.00 $100.00 BUILDING RENTALS - Non - Exclusive Rentals /Hr Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 Theater $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Adventure Peak $300.00 $300.00 Party Plateau - 10 Tables NA $125.00 Pool (swim .team only) $45.00 $45.00 Commercial Photo Shoot Hourl D_ omestic "Photo Shoot Hourl 2014 2015 2014 2015 Any Park Area Blocked Off $250.00 $250.00 Any Park Area Blocked Off $200.00 $200.00 Grotto $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Theatre $250.00 $250.00 Theatre $200.00 $200.00 Great Hall 1 $350.00 $350.00 Great Hall $350.00 1 $350.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK " "PLAYPARK" 2014 2015 Playpark Daily Admission Resident $7.00 $7.00 Non - resident $7.00 $7.00 Children Under 12 Months FREE FREE Adults Free w/ paid child Free w/ paid child REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 7 Edinborou h Association Members Daily Pass $6.00 $6.00 Pla ,park -10 Admission Pass Resident $60.00 $60:00 Non- resident $60.00 $60.00 Resident Season Pass First Member $85.00 $85:00 Each Additional Member $65.00 $65.00 Non- Resident:Sea_son Pass First Member $110.00 $110.00- Each Additional Member $90.00 '$90.00 Total-, Facility. Daily Admission Resident $12.00 $12.00 Non- resident $12.00 $12.00 * *We will be charging sales tax (7.275 %) to all of our fees, charges and purchases AQUATIC CENTER ' 2014 2015 Season Tickets -Resident Famil Rental Concession,Items Weekend Rental - 6 Hour Period First 2 members *$87.50/$97.50 NA Each additional member $47.50 *$43.00/$48.00 Maximum 8 members $382.50 NA Resident Individual *47.00/$52.00 *47.00/$52.00 Non- Resident Family: First 2 members *$102.50/$112.50 NA Each additional member $52.50 *$55.001$60.00 Maximum 8 members $427.50 NA Non - Resident Individual $57.00/$62.00 *$60:00/$65.00 Season FlowRider additional per person *$42.50/$47.50 *$25:00/$45.00 130ily Admissions Daily Admission (resident & non - resident) $10.00 $10.00 Admission after 5 pm $8.00 $8.00 Daily Admission FlowRider additional per person $5.00 $5.00 A . uatic /FlowRiderinstruction Aquatic Instruction Contracted Contracted FlowRider Rental and Instruction - 30 minutes NA $55.00 FlowRider Rental and Instruction -1 hour ' NA $100.00 *Early Bird Special if purchased no later than April 30, 2015. * *Prices DO NOT include tax: CENTENNIAL LAKES 2014 2015 2014 2015 " Rental Concession,Items Weekend Rental - 6 Hour Period Paddle Boats - 4 person boat Y hr. $8.00 $9.00 Friday evening $1,150.00' $1,150.00 Saturday evening $1,150.00 $1,150.00 Winter sled per hr. $7.00 $7.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 8 Ice Skate $6.00 $6.00 2015 Hourly Rate as of 9/13 $210.00 Building Rentals Champion Putting Y2 da - Salon M -TH '. $250:00 - $250.00 9 hole _$5.00_ .- ;$5.00` Sunday- Y2 . da Salon $4,00:00 I $400.00 18 hole $9:00 ; $10.00 Amphitheater Rental Lawn Games Amphitheater Rental $275.00 $300.00 Per Court $20.00 /hr: $20.00 /h r. Commercial Photo Shoot $50.00 /hr. $50:00 /hr. Room Rental NA $25.00 ARENA 2014 2015 Hourly Rate as of 9/13 $210.00 $210.00 Off Season Non -Prime $155.00 $155.00 Off Season Prime Sun -Thurs Evening.) $165.00 $165.00 Early Morn in /Undesirable Ice NA $75.00 Outdoor Rink EHA NA $130.00 Outdoor Rink March 16 - May 15 NA $155.00 Open skating Youth and Adult $5.00 $5.00 Skate Rental $3.00 $3.00 Birthday Party Open Skating $99.00 $99.00 Room Rental NA $25.00 .Room Set-Up/Clean-Up NA $25.00 Season Tickets set first.week bf Se tember Resident Family: First 2 members $115.00 $115.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 - Maximum 7 persons) $165.00 $165.00 Resident Individual $105.00 $105.00 Non - Resident Family: First 2 members $130.00 $130.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum-(7 persons) $180.00 $180.00 Non - Resident Individual $115.00 $115.00 _ .. Classes _ Classes - 30 or 60 minutes $11.75/$22.50 $12.00/$23.00 BRAEMAR FIELD 2014 2015 Hourl Rates Full Field Prime Mon -Fri 4 m -10 m /Sat, Sun 7am -10 m NA $350.00 Half Field Prime Mon -Fri 4 m -10 m/Sat, Sun 7am -10 m NA $175.00 70' Batting Cage NA $60.00 50' Batting Cage NA $50.00 70' Batting Cage - Half hour NA $30.00 50' Batting Cage - Half hour NA $25.00 Full Field Non -Prime NA $150.00 Half Field Non -Prime NA $75.00 Open Turf Time NA $3.00 Residents - No Dome /Field Only NA $6500 Non - Residents - No Dome /Field Only NA $100.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 9 ART CENTER Hours 2011 Class $8.00 hour 2012 -2013 Class $8.50 hour NM /M 2014 -2015 Class $9.00 hour NM /M 2012 -2013 $12.75 per Hour Workshop 2014 -2015 $13.125, per Hour Workshop 30 $255/$230 $270/$243 $3831-$345 $398/$358 29 $247,/$222 $261/$235 $370/$333 $384/$346 28 $238/$214 $2521$227. $357/$321. $371/$334 ,27 $230/$207 $243/$219 $344/$310 $358/$322 26 $221/$199 $234/$211 $332/$299 $345/$310 . 25 $213 / $192 $225/$202 $318/$287 $331/$298 24 $204/$184 $216/$194 $306/$275 $318/$286 23 $196/$176 $207/$186 $293/$264 $305/$274 22 $187/$168 $198/$178 $281/,$253 $292/$262 21 $179/$161 $189/$170 $268/$241 $278/$250 20 $170/$153 $180/$162 $255/$230 $265/$239 19 $162/$146 $171/$154 $242/$218 $252/$227 18 $153/$138 $162/$146 $230/$207 $239/$215 17 $145/$131 $153/$138 $217/$195 $225/$203 16 $136/$122 $144/$130 $204/$184 $212/$191 15 $128/$115 $135/$121 $191/$172 $199/$179 14 $119/$107 $126/$113 $179/$161 $186/$167 13 $111/$100 $117/$105 $166/$149 $172/$155 12 $102/$92 $108/$97 $153/$138 $159/$143 11 $94/$85 $99/$89 $140/$126 $146/$131 10 $85/$77 $90/$81 $128/$115 $133/$119 9 $77/$69 $81/$73 $115/$104 $119/$107 8 $68/$61 $72/$65 $102/$92 $106/$95 7 $60/$54 $63/$57 $89 / $80 $93/$84 6 $511$46 $54/$49 $72/$65 $80/$72 5 $43/$39 $45/$40 $64/$58 $66/$60 4 $34/$31 $36/$32; $51/$46 $53/$48 3 $26/$23 $27/$24 $38/$34 $40/$36 2 $17/$15 $18/$16 $26/$23 $27/$24 1 $9/$8 $9/$8 $13/$11 $13/$12 NM /M — Non - Member /Member EDINA ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS 2014 2015 Annual Family Membership Resident members $5 0 $50.00. $50.00 Annual Individual Membershi Resident members $5 0 $35.00 $35.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 10 PEGGY KELLY MEDIA ARTS STUDIOS DO -IT YOURSELF 2014 2015 EQUIPMENT 2014 2015 SERVICES HOURLY HOURLY RENTAL 2 DAY 2 DAY Greeting Cards FEE FEE Trips & Tours - Members RENTAL RENTAL Transfer movies DVD disk $30.00 NA 35mm Slide Projector $25.00 NA Studio staff does it $50.00 NA Scan pictures or slides to $19.00 NA Hi8mm Camcorder $25.00 NA video (CD or DVD album) Studio staff does it 50¢ /slide NA Audio Dubbing or Transfer $15.00 NA Overhead Projector $20.00 NA Studio staff does it $40.00 NA Digital Video Editing $30.00 NA 16mm Movie Projector $25.00 NA Studio staff does it $50.00 NA Duplicate Copy of DVD $6.00 NA Super 8mm Movie $25.00 NA Projector Audio Cassette Duplication $1.50/ NA 8mm Movie Projector $25.00 NA. copy Movie screen j $5.00 j NA Customer provides blank cassettes (video and audio), film and lamination supplies except as noted. * STUDIO COPYING/TRANSFERRING COMPUTER OPEN STUDIO TIME 2014 2015 PC Computers $35 /hr. NA (includes use of Photoshop, Photoshop Elements, Roxio NM pay $15 add'I video Editing software. daily access fee MEMBERSHIP 2014 2015 Annual Individual Membership (Resident members $5 off) $35.00 NA Annual Family Membership (Resident members $5 off) $50.00 NA EDINA SENIOR CENTER 2014 2015 Fees Golf League Membership Richards Golf Course $12.00 $12.00 Bowling League Membership $11.00 $11.00 Edina Senior Center Membership $17.00/$27.00 $17.00/$27.00 Greeting Cards $1.50 $1.00 Trips & Tours - Members $3.25 $3.25 Trips & Tours - Non - Members $5.25 $5.25 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page II Defensive Driving - 4 hr. class $22.00 $20.00 /HARP Member $25.00 /Non Member Elder Learning Institute Classes $20.00 $20.00 Card Tournaments $1.00/ person $1.00/ person Social'Card Groups (per person/per day) $.25 $.25 Podiatrist ' $3.00 /Patient $100/ patient RoomRental .Classroom or Grandview Room - Resident (2 hr. min.) $40.00 /hr. $40.00 /hr. Classroom or Grandview Room - Non= resident (2 hr. min.) $45.00 /hr. $45.00 /hr. Classroom - Resident - more than 4 hours $150.00 $150.00 Classroom.- Non - resident - more than 4 hours $200.00 $200.00 Fireside Room - per day.- Resident $170.00 $170.00 Fireside Room - per day - Non - resident $200.00 $200.00 Fireside Room - per hour - Resident $50.00 $50.00 Fireside Room - per hour - Non - resident $60.00 $60.00 Wall Art Display Rental 15 %-of sale 15% of sale `Equipment Rental Television/VCR/DVD $12.00 $12.00 Overhead Projector $7.00 $7.00 Portable. Screen $7.00 $7.00 . Dated: December 2, 2014. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this City Clerk day of _,20 o e •'�00RPOFtf`��O • - IBa To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -148 Approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees _ Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 -148 approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees Information / Background: Attached is Resolution 2014 -148 Approving Park and Recreation fees for 2015. Genie r,.,. --+ �.• ��... Park °,... a 1The Park Board reviewed the proposed fees other than the were rt Center fees in October. No changes to Art Center fees are proposed for 2015. However, the Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studio is closing at the end of 2014; and this closure is reflected in the according fee. schedule. The fees that are proposed to change from 2014 to 2015 are in bold. Attachment: Resolution No. 2014 -148 Approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -148 APPROVING 2014 PARK AND RECREATION FEES Page 2 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 2015 Park and Recreation Fees. PARK AND RECREATION 2014 2015 Adult Tennis Instruction $52.00 $62.00 Youth Tennis Instruction Two Days $52.00 $38.00 Youth Tennis Instruction Three Days $71.00 $62.00 Youth Tennis Instruction Four Days $86.00 NA Pee Wee Tennis $38.00 $38.00 Team Tennis $100.00 $105.00 Tennis Cam $104.00 $104.00 Playground $45.00 $45.00 Fab 4 & 5 $95.00 $95.00 Small Wonders $69.00 $69.00 Safety Cam $35.00 $35.00 Super 6 & 7 $62.00 $62.00 Cheerleading Cam $50.00 $50.00 Highlands Explorers $69.00 $69.00 Playground Pros $75.00 $75.00 Travelin' Teens $114.00 $114.00 Pre - Creators $95.00 $95.00 Intro to Sports/Pre-Games $95.00 $95.00 Tiny Tot Sports $95.00 $95.00 Playground Creators $69.00 $69.00 Playground Performers $69.00 $69.00 Leaders in Training $45.00 $45.00 Fishing Clinic $10.00 $10.00 Barnyard Boogie $5.00/ per person $5.00/ per person Santa's Breakfast at Edinborou h Park $10.00 Members $15.00 /Non - Members $10.00 Members $15.00 /Non - Members Schools Out $25.00 $25.00 Garden Plot Rental $35.00 $35.00 Contracted Programs Sk hawks Varies Varies Party Unit Varies Varies Soccer Shots Camp Varies Varies Reach Education Solutions Varies Varies Once Upon a Star Parties Varies Varies REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 ADULT ATHLETIC FEES SUMMER SOFTBALL LEAGUES BASKETBALL 2014 2015 2014 2015 Men's League (formerly non- resident team $490.00 $495.00 5 -Man C League $570.00 $575.00 Men's League - Resident Discount Rate (formerly resident team $430.00 $435.00 5 -Man C League Resident Discount $510.00 $515.00 Co -Rec League (formerly non- resident team) $525.00 $535.00 5 -Man B League $570.00 $575.00 Co -Rec League - Resident Discount Rate (formerly resident team $465.00 $475.00 5 -Man B League Resident Discount $510.00 $515.00 Men's Double Header League (formerly non - resident team) $730.00 $735.00 HOCKEY Men's Double Header League - Resident Discount Rate (formerly resident team $670.00 $675.00 4 -Man League $305.00 $305.00 Showmobile/day 4 -Man League Resident Discount $255.00 $255.00 VOLLEYBALL BROOMBALL Officiated Leagues $415.00 $415.00 Co -Rec League $370.00 $370.00 Officiated Leagues - Resident Discount Rate $365.00 $365.00 Co -Rec League Resident Discount $320.00 $320.00 $165.00 1 CO -REC KICKBALL C -Rec Kickball $150.00 $150.00 Co -Rec League Resident Discount $125.00 $125.00 Per Hour 1 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS 2014 2015 1 2014 2015 General Park Areas Athletic Fields Residents Onl Resident Use /hour $50.00 $50.00 Per field - per day $139.00 $139.00 Resident Use/day $140.00 $140.00 Per field - per hour $50.00 $50.00 Commercial Use (i.e. TV)/hr $80.00 $80.00 Per field - per hour w /li hts $77.00 $77.00 Commercial use with light/hr $135.00 $135.00 Showmobile/day $700.00 $700.00 Edina Athletic Associations Field user fee/participant $11.00 $11.00 Van Valkenburg /Courtney Fields Residents Only) Gymnasium user fee/participant $11.00 $11.00 Per field /day includes building $165.00 1 $165.00 Outdoor hockey rink user fee/pa ici ant $11.00 $11.00 Rosland Park Pathway Residents Only) Utley Park Fire Ring Rental Residents Only) Per Hour 1 $75.00 1 $75.00 Fire Ring - per da $28.00 1 $28.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Per Da $225.00 1 $225.00 Green Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Onl -' Non- Residents Per hour, first hour $85.00 $85.00 Per hour, first hour $105.00 $105.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $55.00 $55.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $75.00 $75.00 Per day 4 hours or more $205.00 $205.00 Per day 4 hours or more $270.00 $270.00 Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only Residents Arneson Acres. Park/Gazebo Only Non- Residents 'h da 6 hrs or less $85.00 $85.00 1 'h da 6 hrs or less $105.00 $105.00 Full day over 6 hours $120.00 $120.00 1 Full day over 6 hours $155.00 $155.00 GROUP FEES - 9 holes Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Non- Residents Per hour, first hour $120.00 $120.00 Per hour, first hour $140.00 $140.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $60.00 $60.00 Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $70.00 $70.00 Per day 4 hours or more $250.00 $250.00 Per day 4 hours or more $294.00 $294.00 Picnic Shelter Rentals - full day (Residents Only) Picnic Shelter Rentals - half day (Residents Onlyl Chowen Park $44.00 $44.00 Chowen Park $28.00 $28.00 Sherwood Park $44.00 $44.00 Sherwood Park $28.00 $28.00 Wooddale Park $44.00 $44.00 Wooddale Park $28.00 $28.00 Rosland Park $155.00 $155.00 Braemar Park $44.00 NA Park Shelter Buildings Rentals - full day Residents Only) Park Shelter Buildings Rentals - half - day Residents Only) Cornelia School Park $105.00 $105.00 Cornelia School Park $70.00 $70. Todd Park $105.00 $105.00 Todd Park $70.00 $70.00. Walnut Ridge Park $105.00 $105.00 Walnut Ridge Park $70.00 $70.00 Weber Park $105.00 $105.00 Weber Park $70.00 $70.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 2014 2015 Green Fees 18 hole - non-patron $39.00/$42.00* $39.00/$42.00* 18 hole - patron $31.00/$32.00* $31.00/$32.00* Senior - patron (age 62 and older $29.00/$30.00* $29.00/$30.00* Senior - non-patron age 62 and older $37.00/$39.00* $37.00/$39.00* 9 hole - non-patron $20.00/$21.00* $20.00/$21.00* 9 hole - patron $16.00/$17.00* $16.00/$17.00* Masters Senior Patrons age 75 and older $25.00/$27.00* $25.00/$27.00* College Age Rate $26.00/$30.00* $26.00/$30.00* Junior 18 Hole Rate $20.00 $20.00 Junior 9 Hole Rate $12.00 $12.00 GROUP FEES - 18 holes $49.00 $49.00 GROUP FEES - 9 holes $25.00 $25.00 Patron Cards Resident Patron Card before April 1 $75.00 $75.00 Resident Patron Card after March 30 $80.00 $80.00 Non - Resident Patron Card before April 1 $90.00 $90.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Non - Resident Patron Card after March 31 $95.00 $95.00 Computerized Handicaps Resident $27.00 $1'5:50 Non - Resident $32:00 .$32.00 . Lockers Junior Men's 72 inch $40.00 $40:00 Men's 42 inch' $30.00 $30.00 Ladies 72 inch $20.00 $20.00 Club Storage $50.00 $50.00 Club Rental $25.00 $25.00 Push; Carts - 9 Hole $5.00 $18.00 Push Carts - 1,8.Hole $7.00 $7.0,0 - _ Golf Cars 18.holes $31.00 $31.00 . 9 holes $1`9.00 $19.00 Group Car Fees $38:00 $38.00. Group,Golf Lessons Adult $105.00 $1.05.00 Junior _ $50.00 $50.'00.. _ Braemar Room Resident - wedding related $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Non- residents. - wedding related $1,200.00 $1,200.00. Other events $375.00/$11200.00 $375.00/$1,200:00.. Braemar Driving_ Range Large Bucket $7.75 $7.75 Small Bucket $5.25 $5.25 Warm -Up Bucket $3.00 $3.00 *Weekend rate Friday through Sunday. BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE -COURSE 20,14 2015 Green Fees Adult non_ atron $1'5:50 $15.50 Adult: patron $12.50 $12.50 . Junior $10.00 $10:00 • Junior - 10 Round Card $75.00_ $75.00' Patron Cards Adults Only 18 and .older $25.00. $25.00 Golf Cars Golf Cars (everyone) $15.00 $15.00 Pull Carts $3.00 $3.00 Group Fees $18.00 $18.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION GOLF DOME Large Bucket $9.00 $9.00 Senior Bucket $8.50 $8.50 Time Golf Y2 hour $14.00 $14.00 Hourly Field Rental $175.00 $175.00 Page 6 EDINBOROUGH PARK 2014 2015 Pool & Track Daily Admission': Pool & Track Daily Passes Residents /Non- Residents) $7.00 $7.00 Pool & Track 10 Admission Pass Pool & Track 10 admission pass residents /non- residents NA $60.00 Pool & Track Annual Membership Edina Individual $260.00 $260.00 Each Additional Member $90.00 $90.00 Non -Edina Individual $290.00 $290.00 Each Additional Member $100.00 $100.00 Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 Birthday Party Packa es /2 Hours Adventure Package $160.00 $160.00 Peak Package $100.00 $100.00 BUILDING RENTALS - Non - Exclusive Rentals /Hr Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 Theater $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Adventure Peak $300.00 $300.00 Party Plateau -10 Tables NA $125.00 Pool (swim team only) $45.00 $45.00 Commercial Photo Shoot Hourl Domestic Photo Shoot Hourl 2014 2015 2014 2015 Any Park Area Blocked Off $250.00 $250.00 Any Park Area Blocked Off $200.00 $200.00 Grotto $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Theatre $250.00 $250.00 Theatre $200.00 $200.00 Great Hall 1 $350.00 1 $350.00 1 Great Hall $350.00 1 $350.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK "PLAYPARK" 2014 2015 Playpark Daily Admission Resident $7.00 $7.00 Non - resident $7.00 $7.00 Children Under 12 Months FREE FREE Adults Free w/ paid child Free w/ paid child REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 7 Edinborough Association Members Daily Pass $6.00 $6.00 Pla park -10 Admission Pass_ Resident $60.00 _$60.00 Non - resident $60.00 $60.00, Resident Season Pass First Member ,... $85.00 $85.00 Each Additional Member $65.00 $65.00 Non- Resident Season Pass First Member $110.00 $110:00 Each Additional Member $9,0:00 $90.00 Total Facili Dail Admission Resident $12.00 $12.00 Non- resident $12.00 $12.00 * *We will be charging sales tax (7.275 %) to all of our fees, charges and purchases AQUATIC CENTER 2014 2015 "Season Tickets Resident Famil 2014 2015 Rental Concession items First 2 members *$87:50 /$97.50 NA Each additional member $47.50 *$43.00/$48.00 Maximum 8 members $382.50 NA Resident Individual *47.00/$52.00 *47.00/$52.00 Non - Resident Family: First 2 members *$102.50/$112.50 NA Each additional member $52.50 *$55.00/$60.00 Maximum 8 members $427.50 NA. Non- Resident Individual $57.00/$62.00 *$60.00/$65.00 Season FlowRider additional per person *$42:50/$47.50 *$25.00/$45.00 Dail Admissions Daily Admission (resident & non - resident ) $10.00 $10.00 Admission after 5 prn $8.00 $8.00 Daily Admission FlowRider additional per person $5.00. $5.00 A ua_tic /Flow_ Rider Instruction Aquatic Instruction Contracted Contracted FlowRider Rental and Instruction - 30 minutes . NA $55.00 FlowRider Rental and InsteUction -1 hour NA $100.00 *Early Bird Special if purchased no later than April 30, 2015. * *Prices DO NOT include tax. CENTENNIAL LAKES 2014. 2015. 2014 2015 Rental Concession items Weekend Rental -.6 Hour Period Paddle Boats - 4. person boat 'h hr. $8.00 $9.00 Friday evening $1,150.00 $1,150.00 Saturday evening $1,150.00 $1,150.00 Winter sled per hr. $7.00 $7:00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 8 Ice Skate $6.00 $6.00 2015 Hourly Rate as of 9/13 Building Rentals Champion 'Puttin Y2 da - Salon M -TH $250.00 $250.00 9 hole. $5.00 $5.00 Sunday: 7 da ' Salon .$400.00 $4,00.00 18 hole $9.00 $10.00 Amphitheater Rental Lawn_ .Games Amphitheater Rental $275:00 $300.00. Per Court $20.00 /hr. $20.00 /hr. Commercial. Photo Shoot $50.00 %hr.` t $50:00 /hr. ,Birthday Party Open Skating $99.00 $99.00. ARENA 2014 2015 Hourly Rate as of 9/13 $210.00 $210.00 Off Season,Non -Prime $155:00 $155.00 Off Season.,Prime Sun -Thurs Evening.) $165.00 $165.00 Early Morn in /Undesirable Ice NA $75.00 Outdoor Rink EHA NA $130:00 Outdoor Rink March 16 - May 15 NA $155.00 Open 9katin Youth and Adult $5.00 $5.00 Skate'Rental $3.00 $3.00 ,Birthday Party Open Skating $99.00 $99.00. Room Rental NA $25.00 RoomSet -U /C lea n -U p NA $25.00 Season Tickets set first week.of September) Resident Famil First 2 members $115.00 $115.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum 7 persons) $165.00 $165.00 Resident Individual $105.00 $105.00 Non - Resident Family: First 2 members $130.00 $130.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum' 7 persons) $180.00 $180.00 Non - Resident Individual $115.00 $115.00 Classes _ _ - Classes - 30 or 60 minutes 1 $11.75/$22.50 $12.001$23.00 BRAEMAR FIELD' 2014 2015 Hourl Rates Full:Field Prime Mon -Fri 4 m -10 m/Sat, Sun 7arim -10 m NA $350.00 Half Field Prime Mon -Fri 4 m -10 m /Sat, Sun lam-10 m) Ni4 $175.00 70' Batting Cage NA $60.00 50' Batting Cage NA $50.00 70' Batting Cage- Half hour 'NA $30.00 50' Batting Cage - Half hour -NA. $25.00 Full Field Non -Prime NA° $150.00 Half Field Non -Prime NA $75.00 Open Turf Time NA $300 Residents - No Dome /Field Only NA $65.00: Non- Residents - No Dome /Field Only .NA $100.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 9 ART CENTER Hours 2011 Class $8.00 hour 2012 -2013 Class $8.50 hour NM /M 2014 =2015 Class $9.00 hour NM /M 2012 -2013 $12.75 per Hour Workshop 2014 -2015 $13,25 per Hour Workshop 30 ..,$255 / $230 $270/$243 $383/$345 $398/$358 29 $247 / $222 $261/$235 $370/$333 $384/$346 28 $238/$214, $252/$227 $357/$321 $371/$334 27 $2301 $207 $243/$219 $344/$310 $358/$322 26 $221/$199 $234/$211 $332/$299 $345/$3'10 25 $213/$192 $225/$202 $318/$287 $331/$298 24 $204/$184 $216/$194. $306/$275 $318/$286 23 $196/$176 $207/$186 $293/$264 $305/$274 22 $187/$168 $198/$178 - $281/$253 $292/$262 21 $179/$161 .$189/$170 $268/$241 $278/$250 20 $170/$153 $180/$162 $255/$230 $265/$239 19 $162/$146 $171/$154 $242 / $218 $252/$227 18 $153/$138 $162/$146 $230/$207 $239/$215. 17 $145/$131 $153/$138 $217/$195 $225/$203 16 $136/$122 $144/$130 $204/$184 $212/$191 15 $128/$115 $135/$121 $191/$172 $199/$179. 14 $119/$107 $126/$1.13 $179/$161 $186/$167 13 $111/$100 $117/$1.05 $166/$149 $172/$155 12 .$102/$92 $108/$97 $153/$138 $159/$143 11 $94/$85 $99/$89 $140/$126 $146/$131 10 $85/$77 $90/$81 $128/$115 $133/$119 9 $77/$69 $81/$73 $115/$104 $119/$107 ' 8 $68/$61 $72/$65 $102/$92 $106/$95 7 $60/$54 $63/$57 $89/$80 $93/$84 6 $51/$46 $54/$49 $72/$65 $80/$72 5 $43/$39 $45/$40 $64/$58 $66%$60 4 $34/$31 $36/$32 $51/$46 $53/$48 3 $26/$23 $27/$24 $38/$34 $40/$36 2 $17/$15 $18/$16 $26/$23 $27/$24 1 $9/$8 $9/$8 $13/$11 $13/$12 NM /M - Non - Member /Member EDINA ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS 2014 2015 Annual Family Membership Resident members $5 0 $50.00 $50.00 Annual Individual Membershi Resident members $5 0 $35.00 $35.00 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 10 PEGGY KELLY MEDIA ARTS STUDIOS DO -IT YOURSELF 2014 2015 EQUIPMENT 2014 2015 SERVICES HOURLY HOURLY RENTAL 2 DAY 2 DAY Greeting Cards FEE FEE Trips & Tours - Members RENTAL RENTAL Transfer movies DVD disk $30.00 NA 35mm Slide Projector $25.00 NA Studio staff does it $50.00 NA Scan pictures or slides to $19.00 NA Hi8mm Camcorder $25.00 NA video (CD or DVD album) Studio staff does it 50¢ /slide NA Audio Dubbing or Transfer $15.00 NA Overhead Projector $20.00 NA Studio staff does it $40.00 NA Digital Video Editing $30.00 NA 16mm Movie Projector $25.00 NA Studio staff does it $50.00 NA Duplicate Copy of DVD $6.00 NA Super 8mm Movie $25.00 NA Projector Audio Cassette Duplication $1.50/ NA 8mm Movie Projector $25.00 NA copy Movie screen $5.00 NA Customer provides blank cassettes (video and audio), film and lamination supplies except as noted. * STUDIO COPYING/TRANSFERRING COMPUTER OPEN STUDIO TIME 2014 2015 PC Computers $35 /hr. NA (includes use of Photoshop, Photoshop Elements, Roxio NM pay $15 add'I video Editing software. daily access fee MEMBERSHIP 2014 2015 Annual Individual Membership (Resident members $5 off) $35.00 NA Annual Family Membership (Resident members $5 off) $50.00 NA EDINA SENIOR CENTER 2014 2015 Fees Golf League Membership Braemar Golf Course $12.00 $12.00 Bowling League Membership $11.00 $11.00 Edina Senior Center Membership $17.00/$27.00 $17.00/$27.00 Greeting Cards $1.50 $1.00 Trips & Tours - Members $3.25 $3.25 Trips & Tours - Non - Members $5.25 $5.25 a REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page II Defensive Driving - 4 hr. class $22.00 $20.00 /AARP Member $25.00 /Non Member Elder Learning Institute Classes $20.00 $20.00 Card Tournaments $1.00/ erson $1.00/ person Social Card Groups (per person/ per day) $.25 $.25 Podiatrist $3.00 /Patient $3.00/ patient Room Rental Classroom or Grandview Room - Resident (2 hr. min.) '$40.00 /hr. $40.00 /hr. Classroom or Grandview Room - Non - resident (2 hr. min.) $45.00 /hr. $45.00 /hr. Classroom - Resident - more than 4 hours $150.00 $150.00 Classroom - Non - resident - more than 4 hours $200.00 $200.00 Fireside Room - per day - Resident $170.00 $170.00 Fireside Room - per day - Non - resident $200.00 $200.00 Fireside Room - per hour - Resident $50.00 $50.00 Fireside Room - per hour - Non - resident $60.00 $60.00 Wall Art Display Rental 15% of sale. 15% of sale Equipment Rental Television/VCR /DVD $12.00 $12.00 Overhead Projector $7.00 $7.00 Portable Screen $7:00 $7.00 Dated: December 2, 2014. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF H.ENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL ,w'91A,1 o Bag Agenda Item #: IV.E From: Robert C. Wilson, City Assessor Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -149 Approving Deferral of Special Assessments Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 - 149 Approving Deferral of Special Assessments Information / Background: State Statutes and City policy allow for the deferment of special assessments for property owners who meet the required eligibility standards and complete an application. An application for deferment has been received and a resolution has been prepared. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -149 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 t RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - 149 APPROVING DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHERAS, certain applications and authorization for deferral of special assessments have been received by the City of',Edina from citizens seeking to have the special assessments for their properties deferred as allowed by provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council: 1. The following applications satisfy the criteria for deferral of special assessments and are hereby granted: PID PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS LEVY NO. 30- 02 &24 =22 -0039 Faye S Rood 6332 Parnell Ave 18887 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 2014 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City. Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: December 2, 2104 Subject: Cable Franchise Transfer ■ w91��f'� o e in 1000 Agenda Item #: IV.F. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Schedule Public Hearing for December 16, 2014 to Consideration Application of Cable System Franchise from Comcast of Minnesota, Inc. to Midwest Cable, Inc. Information / Background: The City has received a request by Comcast of Minnesota to transfer the cable system franchise currently held by Comcast to Midwest Cable, Inc. Legal counsel for the Southwest Cable Commission (SWCC) has reviewed the transfer request and has pronounced it to be sufficient for the purpose of scheduling a public hearing in order for the City Council to formally consider the request. The request will be considered by the Southwest Cable Commission at their regular meeting on Wednesday, December 3. The Commission is charged with forming and forwarding a recommendation to the five member cities (Edina, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, Hopkins and Richfield) for consideration by the respective City Councils. Each City Council must take its own action on the transfer request. At this time, the only action expected of the Council on December 16 is to host a public hearing on the request. It is anticipated the Council will be asked to make a decision on the transfer request in January 2015. Recommendation: Approve the requested action to schedule a public hearing on the request to transfer the City's cable system franchise from Comcast of Minnesota to Midwest Cable. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL oe •'A'Cbn RA��O • 1806 r-� Agenda Item #: IV. G. Revised From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Revised 2015 Council Meeting Dates, and Board and Commission Meeting Dates and Dates of Religious Observance Action Requested: Motion approving the 2015 Council meeting dates, the draft calendar of Board and Commission meetings and dates of religious observance. Information / Background: Council Member Elect Staunton serves the City of Excelsior as their attorney. Excelsior meets on Mondays, so the previously approved City Council adjustment to meetings that moved three meetings to Mondays set up some conflicts. The following three dates are suggested as 2015 meeting dates: • Wednesday, August 5`' to avoid the Nite to Unite on the 4`' • Wednesday, September 16th to avoid conflict with with Rosh Hashanah & Yom Kippur • Wednesday, November v to avoid Election Day on the 3� The attached. calendar has been updated to show these three meetings moved from Mondays to Wednesday. Days of religious observance are shown with red hash marks and are days that we will avoid hosting any meeting or special event. Typical holidays have been highlighted in yellow. There is also a color coded key of City Council and its various Board and Commission meetings. Board and Commission meetings have all been adjusted to avoid days of religious observance. This calendar will be published for use by staff and the public. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St. • Edina, MN 55424 2015 CITY OF EDINA COUNCIL, ADVISORY BRDS, COMS. COMMS. MEETINGS, HOLIDAYS ELECTION DATES F] Holidays a City Council 111111) Nite to Unite F-1 Pin Comm "� HP Brd EJ Tms Com El Park Brd ® Indicates a religious holiday's observance Elect Day Health Human R/R Com F E& E Comm Arts & Culture Comm JANUARY S M T W T F S M T W T 1 2 3 4 5 :. \1-3,, 7 14 8 15 9 16 10 17 11 12 18 19 1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 24 mmm 26 ®I m®mmm.. 29 30 III ©mmmu©© M T W T F S ...0©�`\ 8 9 11 1 ©m 3 unwMamm 5 12 7 8 9 10 11 mm 15 , mmmm 18 19 20 mm® 22 23 24 mmm 26 ®I m®mmm.. 29 30 1 31 29 30 31 ....... III ©©w©wa© M T W T F S .-.0© 8 9 11 1 ©m 3 ©oaoomm 5 12 7 8 9 10 11 ®®ommom 15 16 17 18 19 20 mmmmmm 22 23 24 25 26 ®I mmmmmmm 29 30 1 31 29 30 31 ......- OCTOBER S M T W T F S 7 8 9 11 1 2 3 4 5 12 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 29 30 1 31 FEBRUARY S M T W T F S 1 2 �°�' 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 231 24 251 261 27 28 18 19 20 21 1 221 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 MAY S M T W T F S 1 7 ©m 9 ©mm 1 1 2 3 4 Ilk 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 221 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 mmmmmmm AUGUST S M T W T F S 6 1 7 ©m 9 ©mm 1 2 mma�I'S 15 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 1 15 16 17118 ®m 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 f 31 mmmmmmm • ©©mmma© 1 2 Z '1Q1 4 5 6 1 7 ©m 9 ©mm 12 13 mma�I'S 15 16 17 m ®mmmmmm 21 22 23 24 25 26 ® ®m 29 ®m 31 ®m 26 mm..... 28 29 30 MARCH S M T W T F S 1 2 Z '1Q1 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 JUNE S M T W T F S -. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 1 18 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 mmmmmmm Revised Meeting Schedule for 2015. Dates Subject to Change Revised: 12/2/2014 ©mmmmm© -. © ©m© oo.omm® MMm® ®m®mmmm MMMmmmm mmmmmmm • MMmmm mmmmmmm ®mmm-.. mmmmmmm Revised Meeting Schedule for 2015. Dates Subject to Change Revised: 12/2/2014 ©mmmm©© -. ©Mann m� MMm® ®m®mmmm mmmmmmm mmmmmmm Revised Meeting Schedule for 2015. Dates Subject to Change Revised: 12/2/2014 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: December 2, 2014 MCOAPORl��� 1son Agenda Item #: IV. H. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Authorize Non - Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Services Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: November 24, 2014 Company: Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH), Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $109,125.00 $109,125.00 General Information: We continue to improve our decision making process for infrastructure improvements in -order to make better decisions with our limited financial resources. An example of this occurred as part of the Arden Park D Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project the Council will consider on December 9 at the public improvement hearing. Based on the watermain break data, this neighborhood was scheduled for a complete watermain replacement, both trunk and service pipes. The estimated cost was approximately $1.5 - $2 million. During the preliminary engineering phase, we completed a non - invasive watermain pipe condition assessment. This assessment was completed by Echologics, a division of Mueller Company. They are the only company with this type of testing technology. The data showed that approximately 50% of the trunk pipe had little to no pipe deterioration. Meaning we would have replaced pipe with considerable service life remaining. This decision saved our utility fund approximately $500,000. We believe non - invasive watermain testing should become part of our normal data collection practice prior to a street reconstruction project. This would be similar to the closed circuit televising we complete in the sanitary sewer trunk pipes. It would provide us with more data about the condition of our watermain system. And as the example above shows, it should pay for itself. The proposal includes assessment of approximately 26,000 linear feet of watermain in our anticipated 2016 street reconstruction neighborhoods. They are Golf Terrace B, Strachauer Park A, Morningside A, and White Oaks C. SEH is coordinating Echologics workload between multiple municipalities in the area: This provides a savings to the City in mobilization costs. They will also coordinate data setup and analysis, GIS base mapping, traffic control, and on -site coordination during testing. City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER These services will be funded by the utility fund and are tentatively scheduled for Dec. 2014. Staff recommends hiring-SEH in conjunction with Echologics to complete the non - invasive watermain pipe condition assessment in the anticipated 2016 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Projects. Attachments: • - Engineering Proposal GAFMCENTRAL MMENG DMPROJECTSUMPR N6S%BA420 Golf Terr B(20l6)%ADMINIMISC%WM Condition AssessmentUtem N. H. RFP WM Pipe Condition Assessment.dou -A SEH Building a Better World for All of Us`' SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT November 24, 2014 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: RE: City of Edina Non - invasive Pipe Condition Assessment for Trunk Water Main Pipe SEH No. EDINA P- 130295 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) thanks you for the opportunity to assist the City of Edina (City) with non - invasive pipe condition assessment (PCA). SEH is pleased to partner with Echologics, a division of Mueller Company, to provide you with this opportunity. We will provide these services in accordance. with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. SUMMARY It is our understanding that you wish to consider an assessment project prior to the preparation of bid documents for the proposed 2016 street and utility reconstruction project for an approximate total of 26,300 linear feet of water main. Our 2014 program has received interest from several Cities at this time which should aid in the reduction of mobilization for your project. Spreading these costs amongst the Cities allows us to offer an even better price per linear foot of pipe to complete the work. BENEFITS As you already know from the previous project, choosing to apply this exciting application of leak detection technology to these pipes can provide the following immediate benefits. 1. Allow the City to better coordinate pipe rehabilitation with capital improvement plans for other infrastructure occupying the right -of -way or easement. 2. Allow the City to better understand how much of its pipe network may need rehabilitation. 3. Reduce the amount of money the City spends to create potable water. DELIVERABLES Below is a list of deliverables we will provide to the City at the conclusion of the assessment. An update to the City GIS shape file or geodatabase (geodatabase) for each reach of pipe. We define a reach of pipe as between fire hydrants or main line valves. The update will add the following attributes to the shape file or geodatabase. Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Chad Millner November 24, 2014 Page 2 a. An estimate how much pipe wall has been lost to date. b. An estimate of the pipe's corrosion rate. c. An estimate of the pipe's remaining wall. thickness. . 2,, A written report summarizing the results of the condition assessment and leak detection containing the following information. a. Introduction. b. A discussion of the purpose of leak detection.and condition assessment. c. A discussion of the background of leak detection and condition assessment. d. A discussion of the methodology of leak detection and condition assessment. e. A description of the instrumentation used to complete the,work. f. Tabulatiomof condition assessment results. g. Description of deficiencies the crew found in the field along the pipe network. h. An appendix showing the measured results'for each reach of pipe. We will submit a draft report to the City within 4 weeks of completing field work. Field work is anticipated to occur in December depending on schedules of all cities participating. These services will be provided for, an hourly not to exceed fee of $109,125.00. Please note the following may apply as additional fees: 1. If Echologics' staff is unable to work due'to any reason other than their own (weather excluded), we will invoice the City a standby rate of $3,000 per day. Under such circumstances, we will of course try to work in another City. However, "sometimes this may not be possible because the other Cities will not be ready for our staff. 2. Echologics,Technical Requirements„ Specifications, 'and Constraints outlines the work We assume will be undertaken by City forces at their own expense. Asking" us to accomplish some of this work is an additional expense. We understand that a request to City Council will determine if you are able to proceed with the project at their regularly scheduled December 2, 2014 meeting. Upon approval, we will provide the necessary agreements for City execution. This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. Chad Millner November 24, 2014 Page 3 As always, we look forward to serving the City of Edina and applying our expertise in assessing the condition of the City's water main pipes. Please contact me with questions and comments at 612.255.8747 or cwimpee(�sehinc.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Curt M. impee, PE Project Manager ka Attachments c: Paul J. Pasko III, SEH (SEH Proposal Letter Only w/o Attachments) Toby Muse, SEH (SEH Proposal Letter Only w/o Attachments) Al Turner, Echologics (SEH Proposal Letter Only w/o Attachments) pAaeleledinalcommonlpipe condition assessment december 20141chad millner proposal Itr for pca on 11- 21- 14.docx Accepted on this _day of 2014 City of Edina, Minnesota By: Name Golf Terrace B 0 s, 0 y SOUTHVIEW LA Project Area Length (ft) Morningside A and White Oaks C 4, Stachauer Park A 9, Golf Terrace B 11, Total 26, 1 1 I TER RD Morninaside A & White Oaks C u a C m BRIDGE ST �IProject Area W Morningside A and White Oaks C W :Z Stachauer Park A U, W 'R Golf Terrace B Total — MORNINGSIDERD I LA a z co \ \�— 71 OAKS Le F.'se 45TH ST W H W U Z W F-::] 45TH ST W y ¢ z 47TH ST W 622 ST W °8TH ST Stachauer Park A Project Area I ■ To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #s IV. I. From: Jeff Brown Action Community Health Administrator Discussion ❑ Date: 12/2/14 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -154 Approving Minnesota Department of Health Community . Health Board Grant Project Agreement. Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -154 Authorizing the City of Edina to enter into a Community Health Board Grant Project Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) through the year 2019. Information / Background: The CHB Grant Project Agreement is required for the annual allocation of Local Public Health Grant funding from MDH to the Edina Community Health Board. The attached agreement details Edina's duties relative to the grant and describes administrative procedures. This agreement will span 5 years, taking the place of similar agreements which were previously submitted to MDH on an annual basis. The grant began in 1976 as part of the Community Health Services Act, with the City participating throughout the life of the grant. These funds are used to address areas of public health responsibility and local priorities. The Edina Community Health Commission (CHC) was instrumental in the designation of Edina's local public health priorities, which will help direct funding. The Local Public Health Grant amount for 2015 is $118,919. The funding will be dedicated to the City's contract with Bloomington Public Health to provide Local Public Health Services in Edina. The attached agreement will be in place from January ISt, 2015 through December 31St, 2019. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Agreement. Additional Information / Background: Resolution No. 2014 -154 Minnesota Department of Health Community Health Board Grant Project Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50t! St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO 2014 -154 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARD GRANT CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into'a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services, and WHEREAS, the STATE and the GRANTEE have entered into a Master Grant Contract effective January 1, 2015; and WHEREAS, the STATE provides the GRANTEE Local Public Health Grant funds to address areas of public health responsibility and address local priorities developed through the community health assessment and community health improvement planning process; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into a Community Health Board Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to address local public health responsibilities and, priorities from January 15L, 2015 — December 315`, 2019 for the City of Edina. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of December, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF_HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2nd and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk 0 Grant Project Agreement Number Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board Minnesota Department of Health Community Health Board Grant Project Agreement This Grant Project Agreement, and amendments and supplements, is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Health ( "STATE ") and City of Edina Community Health Board, an independent organization, not an employee of the State of Minnesota, 4801 W 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 ( "GRANTEE "). 1. Under Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, the STATE is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; 2. The STATE and the GRANTEE have entered into Master Grant Contract 12- 700 -00078 ( "Master Grant Contract ") effective January 1, 2015 or subsequent Master Grant Contracts and amendments and supplements thereto; 3. The STATE, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §145A is empowered to provide Local Public Health Grant funds to community health boards to address the areas of public health responsibility and address local priorities developed through the community health assessment and community health improvement planning process. 4. The GRANTEE represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the duties described in this grant project agreement to the satisfaction of the STATE. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.98, subdivision 1, the GRANTEE agrees to minimize administrative costs as a condition of this grant. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: 1. Incorporation of Master Grant Contract. All terms and conditions of the Master Grant Contract are hereby incorporated by reference into this grant project agreement. 2. Term of Agreement. 1.1 Effective date. This grant project agreement shall be effective on January 1, 2015, or the date the STATE obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16B.98. Subd. 5(a), whichever is later. The GRANTEE must not begin work until this contract is fully executed and the State's Authorized Representative has notified the GRANTEE that work may commence. 1.2 Expiration date. December 31, 2019, or until all obligations have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the STATE, whichever occurs first, except for the requirements specified in this grant project agreement with completion dates which extend beyond the termination date specified in this sentence. 3. Grantee's Duties and Responsibilities The GRANTEE shall: Complete the duties set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated in this grant project agreement. 4. Consideration and Payment. 4.1 Consideration. The STATE will pay for all services performed by the GRANTEE under this grant project agreement as follows: (a) Compensation. The GRANTEE will be paid according to the amount determined annually for the GRANTEE's portion of the total Local Public Health Grant allocation from the state. (b) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the GRANTEE under this grant project agreement will not exceed the amount specified in the GRANTEE's annual award letter from the STATE. 09/2014 Grant Project Agreement Page 1 Grant - Project Agreement Number Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board 4.2 Terms of Payment. (a) Invoices. The State will promptly pay the GRANTEE after the GRANTEE presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted in a timely fashion and according to the following schedule: The GRANTEE will submit invoices within 30 days of the end of the invoice period. The GRANTEE will choose either to submit invoices on a monthly or quarterly basis and will hold to this scheduled unless a request to change is submitted to the STATE's Authorized Representative. Invoices will be submitted to: Health. LPHAInvoiceSubmission kstate.mn.us. Include the GRANTEE name and "LPH Grant" in the subject line. (b)Matching Requirements. GRANTEE certifies that the following matching requirement, for the grant, will be met by GRANTEE: The GRANTEE will provide at least a 75 percent match for the state funds received through the local public health grant. Eligible funds must be used to meet match requirements. When the amount of local matching funds is less than the amount required the local public health grant will be reduced proportionally. S. Conditions of Payment, All services provided by GRANTEE pursuant to this grant project agreement must be performed to the satisfaction of the State, as determined in the sole discretion of its Authorized Representative. Further, all services provided by the Grantee must be in accord with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. 6. Ownership -of Equipment. The STATE shall have the right to require transfer of all equipment purchased with grant funds (including title)'to the STATE or to an eligible non -STATE party named by the STATE. This right will normally be exercised by the STATE only if the project or program for which the equipment was acquired is transferred from one grantee to another. 7. Authorized Representatives. 7.1 STATE's Authorized Representative. The STATE's Authorized Representative for purposes of administering this grant project agreement is DeeAnn Finley, LPH Policy and Administration Specialist, Office of Performance Improvement, PO Box 64975, St. Paul, MN 55164, (651) 201 -4551, deeann.finley(ciistate.mn.us or her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the GRANTEE's performance and the final authority to accept the services provided under this grant project agreement. If the services are satisfactory, the STATE's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. 7.2 GRANTEE's Authorized Representative. The GRANTEE's Authorized Representative is Jeffrey Brown, CHS Administrator, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, 952- 826 -0466, ibrown(ajEdinaklN.gov, or his successor. The GRANTEE's Authorized Representative has full authority to represent the GRANTEE in fulfillment of the terms, conditions, and requirements of this agreement. If the GRANTEE selects a new Authorized Representative at an y time during this grant project agreement, the GRANTEE must immediately notify the STATE. 8. Termination 8.1 Termination by the STATE. The STATE or GRANTEE may cancel this grant project agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 8.2 Termination for Cause. If the GRANTEE fails to comply with the provisions of this grant project - agreement, the State may terminate this grant project agreement without prejudice to the right of the STATE to recover any money previously paid. The termination shall be.effective five business days after the STATE mails, by certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice of termination to the GRANTEE at its last known address. 09/2014 Grant Project Agreement Page 2 Grant Project Agreement Number Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board 8.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The STATE may immediately terminate this grant project agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota legislature or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the work scope covered in this grant project agreement. Termination must be by written (e -mail, facsimile or letter) notice to the GRANTEE. The STATE is not obligated to pay for any work performed after notice and effective date of the termination. However, the GRANTEE will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The STATE will not be assessed any penalty if this grant project agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The STATE must provide the GRANTEE notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the STATE receiving notice of the same. 09/2014 Grant Project Agreement Page 3 Grant Project Agreement Number Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this project agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED: 1. GRANTEE 2. STATE AGENCY The Grantee certifies that the appropriate persons(s) have Project Agreement approval and certification that STATE executed the project agreement on behalf of the Grantee as funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05. ordinances. By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: By: Title: Date: Distribution: • MDH (Original fully executed Grant Project Agreement) • Grantee • State Authorized Representative 09/2014 Grant Project Agreement Page 4 Exhibit A: Local Public Health Grant Duties: 1. Use these funds and matching funds to work in partnership with the STATE to address the areas of public health responsibility and essential public health services as defined in 145A. 2. At least every five years, conduct an assessment of community health needs and assets upon which the local public health priorities and issues are established. 3. Seek input from the community and the Community Health Board on the identification of local public health priorities and issues. 4. Standards and /or evidence -based practices for programs or activities will be used in carrying out public health programs or activities where those standards or evidence -based practices exist. 5. Consider community input and recommendations of the Community Health Board to determine the mechanisms to address local public health priorities and achieve the statewide local public health objectives. 6. Consider the essential public health services (MN Statutes 145A) in determining the mechanisms to address local public health priorities and achieve statewide local public health objectives. 7. Implement a performance management process to achieve desired outcomes. 8. Report annually to the STATE on a set of performance measures and be prepared to provide documentation of ability to meet the performance measures. 9. Use the Disease Prevention and Control Common Activities Framework, as adopted by the State Community Health Services Advisory Committee (SCHSAC), as the foundation for providing resources and services in keeping with its responsibilities as set forth in the framework. 10. At least once during the grant cycle, submit documentation to the STATE assuring that the GRANTEE duties, responsibilities and related community health board work have been reviewed with the Community Health Board. The document should be signed by the Chair of the Community Health Board and the Community Health Services Administrator. 11. Provide the STATE with required reports and information within the timeline and guidance provided by the STATE. 12. If the CHB decides to subcontract activities, the contract should not be executed or otherwise entered into until approval from the Minnesota Department of Health has been received from the State's Authorized Agent. 13. Maintain records of the following materials for review: a. Copies of the Joint Powers Agreement forming the Community Health Board. b. Any delegation agreements as referenced in MN Statute 145A. c. When applicable, agreements establishing a Human Services Board under MN Statutes 402. d. Organization chart of the Community Health Board structure that identifies major program activities and lines of authority and accountability. e. A list of all city /county local ordinances or other local regulations related to community health services revised within the past two years. f. Copies of all public meeting notices and minutes, including Community Health Board notices and minutes. g. Summary of public comments or testimony on the local public health priorities and /or mechanisms to address the priorities and achieve statewide outcomes. h. Copies of contracts /purchase of service agreements with other organizations. 14. Notify MDH six months prior to any final board action on major governance or organizational structural changes within the Community Health Board or its member counties. This notification requirement is in addition to the withdrawal notification requirement outlined in MN Stat 145A. o ,1roRPOSiA�F'� o iaaa To: City Council & Mayor Agenda Item #: IV. J. From: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: 2015 Human Services Task Force Recommendation Action Requested: Approve Human Services Task Force funding recommendations for 2015. Information / Background: The 2014 Human.Services Task Force was composed of 5 volunteer members. Courtney Whited, Chair (Transportation Commission) Pat Arseneault (Human Rights and Relations Commission Joyce, Mellom (Heritage Preservation Board) Christina Wagner (Student Member) Aanik Lohani (Student Member) 2015 Funding Recommendations as discussed in the City Council Work Session on November 18, 2014: Organiation Recommended Amount The Bridge for Youth $6,500 Conflict Resolution Center $2,000 Cornerstone Advocacy Service $1 4,700 Normandale Center for Healing and Wholeness $4,700 Oasis for Youth $2,500 Senior Community Services $19,200 Store to Door $11,700 VEAP $25,000 Total = $86,300 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item-# IV. K. From: Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 1014 Information ❑ Subject: 2015 -2016 Union Contract for I.A.F.F. Local 1275: Paramedics /Firefighters Action Requested: Approve the 2015 -2016 union contract for International Association of Firefighters (I.A.F.F.) Local 1275 Representing: Paramedics /Firefighters. Information / Background: The tentative agreement for this bargaining unit includes the following substantive changes from.the previous contract: • Duration: A two -year agreement (2015- 2016). • Market adjustments: A 2.5% increase effective January 1, 2015, which is equal to the increase that was given to all other full -time non -union and union employees. A 2.5% increase effective January 1, 2016: This increase should allow us to maintain our position in the market. • Increase in paramedic certification pay for lieutenants and inspectors (5 employees) from $1464 to $1800 per year. • Increase in fitness incentive maximum reimbursement from $630 to $680 per year. • Increase in acting shift officer from $1.25 per hour to $2.50 per hour. In addition there are a number of language changes that the union agreed to that serve to clarify outdated language, ease payroll administration, and /or increase consistency with the city -wide Employee Handbook Attachments: • 1 1 -13 -2014 Tentative Agreement between City of Edina and Local 1275 IAFF • Master Labor Agreement between the City of Edina and International Association of Firefighters Local No. 1275: January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St Edina, MN 55424 I I -13 -2014 TENATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDINA AND LOCAL 1275 IAFF 1. Call -back Time 13.6 If an employee is held past his /her scheduled end time for purposes of maintaining minimum staff levels at station two, when the Fire Department was.given a minimum of one (1) hour of notice of the short staffing situation, the shift supervisor must notify the replacement within 45 minutes of the start of the shift or the held -over employee shall receive a minimum of one hour of pay at his /her overtime rate as defined in Article III. Thsr n..« _i_ i 10; ;AF*11 -- -- be paFt _ f the - -- =" = -- • - r'=- - ..b_ 3 i 2014. 2.. Time - recording 12.2 Payments shall be made the nearest uarter hour. 13.3 Payments for time beyond the minimum designated 13.1 and 13.2 shall be to the nearest uarter hour. 3. Vacation Cash Out 19.3 Vacation earned during the calendar year but not used and /or unused EVAA hours may be cashed out at the Employee's request on a pro -rata basis at the'Employee's base pay rate. Not more than twelve (12) days per calendar year shall be cashed out for Employees scheduled for 40 hours per week and not more than seven (7) days per calendar year shall be cashed out for Employees working other shifts. Such cash out shall occur within in November of each year. 4. Floating Holiday Cash Out 20.3 Employees working other than an eight (8) hour day shall receive neither pay nor time off for those holidays listed in 20.1. However, each member shall be given six (6) floating holidays which they may schedule utilization of in the same manner as vacation. There shall be no carryover of unused accrual from year to year. days at eRe additional full dFRe pay feF each day net util Floating holidays earned during the calendar .,year but not used may be cashed out at the Employee's request up to a maximum of the six (6) days granted per year. The cash out, if chosen, of these days shall be done twice during the year. After June an Employee can'cash out a maximum of three (3) floating holidays. After- DeeembeF ' and b-c��� In November, an Employee can cash out the remaining floating holidays. Floating holidays: Employees who are not actively employed with the City twelve (12) months in any calendar year (new hires, leaving employment with less than twelve (12) months in the calendar year, leave of absence) shall be granted their floating holidays in accordance with pro -rated ratio of one day for every 2.0 months of service, or portion thereof. S. Article 22 Fitness Incentive Increase from a maximum reimbursement of $630 per year to $680 per year. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 11 -14 -2014 Paged 6. Educational Incentive 2-5425.2 All Employees shall be eligible for participation in the City's Training and Education program as from time to time amended and as described in the City of Edina Employee Handbook. 2-54-25.3 Employees will receive an additional payment identified in Appendix A- I,upon successful completion of a fire service A.A.S degree or a bachelor's degree. Degrees must be from an institution or equivalent program approved by the Fire Chief. 7. Article 28 Funeral Leave Paid. leave (sick, vacation, etc) may be used for funeral leave as defined in the City's personnel policies /Employee Handbook. 8. Severance Pay 29.1 Employees who accrue sick leave and who leave employment with the City in good standing. (as described in the Resignation and Retirement section of the Employee Handbook. General Employment Policies) will receive 50% of his /her accrued but unused sick leave up to a maximum of 960 hours (1920 hours of accrued but unused sick leave x 50 %). Sick leave will be cashed out at the employee's base rate of pay. Payment for employees working other than 40 hour schedules shall not exceed 1.440 hours (2.880 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50 %). The payment shall be based upon the employee's rate of Day at the time of separation. The ayment shall be made within 30 days of separation. 29.2 Grandfathered Severance Program Effeedye May 1, 201 1, this Article applies enly te these empleyees hired befere May 1, 201 1, and these wh Res-: r-hR-A-,-;e the Gity's pelic-y te buy back sick leiwe. See Appendix A . Employees hired prior to May 1. 2011 had the option to opt -out of the severance program described above and remain in the Grandfathered Severance CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 11 -14 -2014 Page 12 the Empleyee's heuseheld. The aFneunt in any ease, te ete r-rA a Red by the City Manager-, but not less thaFt Paid. leave (sick, vacation, etc) may be used for funeral leave as defined in the City's personnel policies /Employee Handbook. 8. Severance Pay 29.1 Employees who accrue sick leave and who leave employment with the City in good standing. (as described in the Resignation and Retirement section of the Employee Handbook. General Employment Policies) will receive 50% of his /her accrued but unused sick leave up to a maximum of 960 hours (1920 hours of accrued but unused sick leave x 50 %). Sick leave will be cashed out at the employee's base rate of pay. Payment for employees working other than 40 hour schedules shall not exceed 1.440 hours (2.880 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50 %). The payment shall be based upon the employee's rate of Day at the time of separation. The ayment shall be made within 30 days of separation. 29.2 Grandfathered Severance Program Effeedye May 1, 201 1, this Article applies enly te these empleyees hired befere May 1, 201 1, and these wh Res-: r-hR-A-,-;e the Gity's pelic-y te buy back sick leiwe. See Appendix A . Employees hired prior to May 1. 2011 had the option to opt -out of the severance program described above and remain in the Grandfathered Severance CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 11 -14 -2014 Page 12 M Program. Those employees who opted out have paperwork on file with Human Resources. Those employees who chose to opt -out follow this program instead of the above program: Employees who leave employment in good standing with the City, upon completion pf at least 15 years continuous employment with the City, or who become totally and permanently disabled as.determined by PERA under PERA rules, or who are permanently laid off shall receive a maximum of 6 weeks pay to be issued upon such termination. A person may only receive such payment once from the City. 29.3 In order to resign in good standing, an employee must provide his or her supervisor and Human Resources with a written resignation stating the last date of work and reason for leaving at least 14 calendar days prior to the resignation date. The City may accept lesser notice if, in the City's determination. the 14 calendar day notice cannot be reasonably given. In order to leave in in good standing an employee must also return all City property and cooperate with requests for work - related information. Delete Appendix A -2 Sick Leave 9. Article 31 Duration January I, 2015 — December 31, 2016. 10. Appendix A -I Salary Schedule • 2015: 2.5% to all steps within job classifications • 2016: 2.5% to all steps within job classifications. • Supplemental: Paramedic Certification pay for Lieutenants and Inspectors is $1800.00 (.87 for 40 hour per week and .62 for other schedules.) • Supplemental: Education incentive under 25.5 for all classifications is $1675.00 (.81 per hour for 40 -hour per week employees and .58 per hour for other scheduled. Working out of classification • In exchange for eliminating the Acting Fire Lieutenant or Fire Inspector pay, The City will add an additional $0.09 to the steps for Years 2 -8 of the Firefighter /Inspector and Firefighter /Paramedic job classifications in 2015. • Acting Shift Officer - $2.50 per hour in addition to the employee's hourly pay rate. • FTO - $1.50 per hour in addition to the employee's hourly pay rate. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 11 -14 -2014 Page 13 MASTER LABOR AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDINA and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 1275 JANUARY 1, 2013 to DECEMBER 31, 2014 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 January 1, 2013 - INDEX ARTICLE PAGE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT ................................... ..............................3 I1RECOGNITION ..................................................::..... ..............................3 III DEFINITIONS ...................... ......... ............................... ..............................3 IV EMPLOYER SECURITY :: ........................................ ..............................4 V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY ..................:................... ..............................4 VI ASSOCIATION SECURITY ..................................... ..............................5 VII ASSOCIATION BUSINESS ...................................... ..............................5 VIII EMPLOYEE RIGHTS= GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ............................6 IX SAVINGS CLAUSE .................................................. ..............................9 XSENIORITY ............................................................... ..............................9 XIWORK SCHEDULES ................................................ ..............................9 XII OVERTIME PAY ..................................... ............................... XIII CALL -BACK TIME .........................:........................ .............................10 XIV SHIFT EXCHANGE ................................................. ..:..........................10 XV DISCIPLINE ............................................................. .............................11 XVI PROBATIONARY PERIOD ... ........... ::.................: XVII SICK LEAVE WITH PAY ........................................ .............................11 XVIII WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION ............... .............................11 XIXVACATION .............................................................. .............................12 XXHOLIDAYS ............................................................... .............................13 XXIUNIFORMS .............................................................. .............................14 XXII FITNESS INCENTIVE ............................................. .............................15 XXIII INSURANCE ...........................................:................ .............................15 XXIV WAIVER .........................................:......................:.. .............................15 XXV LONGEVITY AND EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE ............................16 XXVI PARAMEDIC CERTIFICATION INCENTIVE ...... .............................16 XXVII INJURY IN LINE OF DUTY ......:............................. .............................17 XXVIII FUNERAL LEAVE ................................................... .............................17 XXIX SEVERANCE PAY .................................................. .............................17 XXX PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES ...................... .............................17 XXXI DURATION ............................................................... .............................18 XXXII ............... LICENSURE ................:. ............................ .............................18 APPENDIXA -1 SALARYSCHEDULE .................................... .............................19 APPENDIX A -2 POLICY FOR THE PAYMENT OF UNUSED SICK TIME........ 21 APPENDIX A -3 POLICY FOR A HEALTH CARE SA VINGS PLAN .................... 22 Page 2 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between the City of Edina, hereinafter called Employer, and Local No. 1275, International Association of Firefighters, hereinafter'called the Association. The intent and purpose of this Agreement is to: 1.1 Establish certain hours, wages and other conditions of employment; 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this Agreement's interpretation and/or application; 1.3 Place in written form the parties' full and complete Agreement upon the terms and conditions of employment specified and for the duration of this Agreement. ARTICLE II RECOGNITION The Employer recognizes the Association as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179.7 1, Subd. 3 for the following job classifications; Firefighter Firefighter /Inspector Firefighter/Lieutenant Firefighter/Paramedic ARTICLE III DEFINITIONS 3.1 Association: The International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 1275. 3.2 Employer: The City of Edina. 3.3 Association Member: A member of the International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 1275. 3.4 Employee: A member of the formally recognized bargaining unit. 3.5 Base Pay Rate: The employee's biweekly pay rate, inclusive of the paramedic certification incentive (for inspectors and lieutenants), longevity or educational incentive. 3.6 Hourly Pay Rate: The Employee's pay rate calculated on an hourly basis. 3.7 Work Week: The maximum hours worked per week shall be average of 55.85 hours. 3.8 Overtime Pay: One and one -half times the Employee's base pay rate calculated on an hourly basis using the normal work week of the Employee in the computations. 3.9 Acting Officer: A temporary job assignment that is used as defined in Article 18 Page 3 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 of this document. 3.10. Promotion: Promotion -is defined as the advancement of an Employee to .a higher paying job classification or position and shall not include temporary assignments of personnel for training. 3.11 Association Executive Board shall be made up of the current elected President, Vice President and Secretary/Treasurer. ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SECURITY 4.1 The Association agrees that during the life of the Agreement, it will not cause, encourage, participate in or support.any strike, slow -down or other interruption of, or interference with, the normal functions of the Employer. 4.2 Any Employee who engages in a strike shall have his/her appointment or employment terminated by the Employer effective the date the violation first occurs. Such termination shall be effective upon written notice served upon the Employee by registered mail. 4.3 An Employee who is absent from any portion of his/her work assignment without permission, or who abstains wholly or in part from the full performance of his/her duties without permission from his/her Employer on the date or dates when a strike occurs is prima facie presumed to have engaged in a strike on such date or dates. 4.4 An Employee who knowingly strikes and whose employment has been terminated for such action may, subsequent to such violation, be appointed or reappointed or employed or re- employed, but the Employee shall be on probation for two years with respect to such employment status, tenure of employment of contract of employment, as he /she may have theretofore been entitled. 4.5 No Employee shall be entitled to any daily pay, wages, or per diem for the days on which he /she engaged in a strike. Page 4 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF "Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 ARTICLE V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The Employer retains full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organization structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by-this Agreement. 5.2 The rights and authority which the Employer has not officially abridged delegated or modified by this Agreement, are retained by the Employer. ARTICLE VI ASSOCIATION SECURITY 6.1 The Employer shall deduct from the wages of Employees who authorize such deduction in writing an amount necessary to cover monthly Association dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the Association. 6.2 The Association shall designate Employees from the bargaining unit to act as President, Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer, and three (3) Shift Stewards. The Association shall inform the Employer in writing of such choices and any changes in President, Vice President, Secretary /Treasurer and Shift Stewards. 6.3 The Employer shall make space available on the Employee bulletin board for posting Association notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 The Association agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders or judgments brought or issued against the City as a result of any action taken or not taken by the City under the provision of this Article. ARTICLE VII ASSOCIATION BUSINESS 7.1 It is recognized and accepted by the Association and the Employer that the conduct of the Association business is limited to the job duties and responsibilities of the Employee and shall, therefore, be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The Employer shall permit a maximum of three (3) Association representatives a reasonable amount of time off with pay to conduct negotiations with the Employer when such negotiations are conducted during their normal working hours, provided that the Association has notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable.and would not be detrimental to the work program of the Employer. 7.2 The Employer agrees to permit the Association to hold a reasonable number of Page 5 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January, 1, 2010 Association business meetings per year of no more than two (2) hours duration each in the City Fire'Station,,6250 Tracy Avenue, provided the Association has notified and received approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such meeting is.at a reasonable time and would not be detrimental to the work program of the Employer..On- duty,Employees will be permitted to attend said Association meetings provided such attendance is not detrimental to the work program of the Employer. The Association agrees that should an emergency arise, on -duty Employees and those off- -duty Employees as may be designated by the officer in charge of the shift shall respond and carry out all duties assigned. 7.3 Officers, agents, representatives or members of the Association who are not Employees of the Fire Department shall have access to the premises of the City, at reasonable times, provided, they notify the Fire Chief or the Chief's designee of their presence upon arrival, and that their presence will not, in the opinion of the Chief or the Chief's designee; disrupt the orderly routine of the Department. ARTICLE VIII EMPLOYEE RIGHTS- GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 8.1 DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8.2 ASSOCIATION REPRESENTATIVES' The Employer will recognize Representatives designated by the Association as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The Association shall notify the Employer in writing of the names of such Association Representatives and of their successors when so designated. 8.3 PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE It is recognized and accepted by the Association and the Employer that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job.duties and responsibilities of the Employee and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved Employee and Association Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to,the :Employer during normal working hours provided that the Employee and the Association Representative have notified and received approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and :would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. Page 6 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAF_F Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010, 8.4. PROCEDURE Grievances; as defined by section 8. 1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step 1 An Employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this-AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the Employer - designated representative on the shift during which time the alleged violation occurred. The Employer-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not.resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth -the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the AGREEMENT allegedly violated, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Employer - designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by the Association within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Association and discussed with the Employer- designated representative. The Employer - designated representative shall give the Association the Employer's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer's final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Association within_ ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Association and discussed with the City Manager. The City Manager shall give the Association the Employer's answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the City Manager's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Association within ten (10) calendar days shall be'considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in the following manner:. Either the Employer or the Association shall request the Bureau of Mediation Services to submit a list of five (5) arbitrators. The Employer and the Association shall alternately strike names'from the list until one name remains who' shall be the arbitrator. The party entitled to strike the first name shall be determined by the toss of a fair coin. 8.5 A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or., subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall Page 7 of 22 i` Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Association, and shall have no. authority. to make .a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to. make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force.and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following the close of the hearing,or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever, be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Association and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the expressed terms. of this Agreement: and to the facts of the grievance presented: C. The fees and, the expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Association provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it, pays for the record. If both parties desire verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. _ 8.6 WAIVER If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered waived. If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension-thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Association may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the Employer and the Association in each step. 8.7 CHOICE OF REMEDY If, as'a result of the, written Employer response in Step 3 the grievance remains unresolved; and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an Employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance,may,be appealed either to Step 4 of Article VIII or a procedure such as Veteran's Preference or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VIII the grievance is not subject to the-arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of Article VIII. The aggrieved Employee shall indicate, in writing, which procedure is to be utilized -Step 4 of Article VIII or another appeal procedure - and shall sign a statement of the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved Employee from making a subsequent appeal through step 4 of Article VIII. Page 8 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 ARTICLE IX SAVINGS CLAUSE The Agreement is subject to law. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the'written request of either party. ARTICLE X SENIORITY 10.1 Seniority shall be determined by the Employee's length of continuous employment with the Fire Department and posted in an appropriate location. Seniority rosters shall be maintained by the Employer on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. 10.2 A reduction of the work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. No full -time firefighter (i.e. member of the Association) shall be laid off while any volunteer /paid on call firefighter remains on the roster except under Article XV of this Agreement. 10.3 Employees shall be recalled from lay off on the'basis of seniority. An Employee on lay off shall have an opportunity to return to work within two years of the time of his lay off before any new Employee is hired. Recall notification shall be by registered mail with Employee having two (2) weeks to return to work to retain his seniority rights. 10.4 Vacation periods shall be selected on the basis of seniority until January 2 °d of each year. 10.5 Senior qualified shift Employees shall be given shift preference after eighteen (18) months of continuous full -time employment with the department. ARTICLE XI WORK SCHEDULES The sole authority in establishing work schedules is the Employer. The Employer agrees to give the Affected Employee fifteen (15) calendar days notice of non - emergency changes in the work schedule which affects one (1) or more Employees of the department. The Employer reserves the right to make emergency changes in the work schedule as may be necessary without prior notice to the Affected Employee. ARTICLE XII OVERTIME PAY 12.1 Hours worked in excess of what is the normal work day (except for shift changes), as established by the Employer in the Employee's work schedule, shall be considered overtirrie and shall be compensated for at the overtime rate as defined in Article III. Page 9 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 12.2 Payments shall be made to the nearest tenth hour. 12.3 Overtime shall be restricted to, necessary work authorized by the Employee's authorized supervisor. 12.4 Employees have the obligation to work overtime if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the Employee from so working. ARTICLE XIII CALL -BACK TIME 13.1 An Employee who is called to duty. during his scheduled off -duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at his overtime rate defined in Article III. 13.2 If an Employee is called to duty between the hours of 2200 to 800, he shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at his overtime rate as defined in ARTICLE III. 13.3 Payments for time beyond the minimum designated 13.1 and 13.2 shall be to the nearest tenth hour. 13.4 Employees have the obligation to answer call -backs if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the Employee from so answering. 13.5 No Employee receiving overtime pay under this Article shall be paid more than once for the same hours worked. No compounding of overtime pay will be allowed under this Article. 13.6 If an employee is held past his/her scheduled end time for purposes of maintaining - minimum staff levels at station two, when the Fire Department was given a minimum of one (1) hour of notice of the short staffing situation, he /she shall receive a minimum of one hour of pay at his/her overtime rate as defined in Article III. This Article 13.6 will cease to be part of the contract effective December 31, 2014. ARTICLE XIV SHIFT EXCHANGE 14.1 Employees may exchange duty shifts with another Employee provided that such exchange does. not subject the Employer to liability for additional overtime compensation by virtue of such trading of duty shifts. 14.2 Employees may exchange shifts only with the specific approval of the Employer and under the conditions established by the Employer. 14.3 All shift exchanges that are made and. approved must be made up within twelve (12) months from the date on which the exchange is made. Page 10 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 ARTICLE XV DISCIPLINE 15.1 Nothing in the Agreement shall abridge the Employer's right to discipline for just cause, such discipline being subject to the grievance procedure. 15.2 Discipline will be in one or more of the following forms: a) oral reprimand d) demotion b) written reprimand e) discharge c) suspension ARTICLE XVI PROBATIONARY PERIOD 16.1 All newly hired Employees will serve a one (1) year probationary period. At any time during the probationary period, a newly hired Employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the Employer. 16.2 The probationary period shall also apply to all- promotions and reclassifications within the Fire Department. If, during the promotional probationary period, the Employee does not meet the Employer's standards of performance, the Employee shall be demoted to his previous classification at the sole discretion of the Employer. ARTICLE XVII SICK LEAVE WITH PAY 17.1 Employees working a forty (40) hour work week shall accrue sick leave, with pay, at the rate. of 3.69 hours per bi- weekly pay period with a maximum accumulation of 960 hours. Other Employees shall accrue sick leave, with pay, at the rate of 7.38 hours per bi- weekly pay period with a maximum accumulation of 2,880 hours. 17.2 See Appendix A -2 for payment of unused sick leave. ARTICLE XVIII WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Any Employee required by the Employer to perform the duties and assume the authority of a higher position or rank shall receive compensation in accordance with this article and Appendix A. Assignment to a higher position or rank is at the sole discretion of a chief officer. 18.1 Any Employee required by the Employer to perform the duties and assume the responsibility of Inspector, Fire Lieutenant, or shift officer for less than four (4) hours per shift shall not receive any additional compensation. Employees required by the Employer to perform the duties and accept the authority of Inspector, Fire Lieutenant, or shift officer for more than four (4) hours per shift shall receive compensation as provided for in Appendix A. Employees so assigned for more than four (4) hours per shift will be paid retroactively for the primary four hours. Page 11 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF: Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 18.2 Any Employee required by the Employer to perform the duties and assume the responsibility of a field training officer (FTO) shall receive compensation as provided for in Appendix A while performing the duties of a field training officer. ARTICLE XIX VACATION 19.1 Employees shall accrue vacation with pay in accordance with the following schedule: Employees Scheduled Employees Working For 40 Hours Per Week Other Schedules 5 years or less 3.08 hours /pay period 5.08 hours /pay period Commencing with the 6th year thru the 10th year of service Commencing with the 11th year thru the 15th year of service Commencing with the 16th year of service 4.92 hours /pay period 5.54 hours /pay period 6.46 hours /pay period Commencing with the 21s' 6.76 hours /pay period year of service 7.85 hours /pay period 8.77 hours /pay period 10.15 hours /pay period 11.08 hours /pay period 19.2 Effective 1 -1 -13, employees will be able to accrue a maximum of 480. hours of vacation leave for 40 hour per week employees, and 672 hours of vacation leave for employees working other schedules. Once the maximum level of vacation is reached, additional leave will not be accrued until the balance falls below the. maximum accrual level. Unused vacation leave up to the maximum balance of 480/672 hours will be paid to employees who leave in good standing upon termination of employment. The first year of employment, new employees will be allowed to carry a negative balance of vacation to a maximum of -80 hours. Transition to New Cap In January, 2013 any amount of vacation over two hundred (200) hours will be placed into.an "Excess Vacation Accrual Account (EVAA) ". This is a one -time transfer. Employees will not ' be able to add .any vacation to the EVAA after January, 2013. The balance in the EVAA will be reflected on the employee's pay stub and can be used in the following ways: Page 12 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 c Vacation or sick leave in one -hour increments. Any remaining balance at termination will be cashed out at the current base rate of pay for employees who leave in good standing. 19.3 Vacation earned during the calendar year but not used may be cashed out at the Employee's request on a pro-rata basis at the Employee's base pay rate. Not more than twelve (12) days per calendar year shall be cashed out for Employees scheduled for 40 hours per week and not more than seven (7) days per calendar year shall be cashed out for Employees working other shifts. Such cash out shall occur within in November of each year. ARTICLE XX HOLIDAYS 20.1 The Employer recognizes the following as paid holidays: New Year's Day January 1 Martin L. King Day Third Monday in January Presidents Day Third Monday in February Good Friday Friday next preceding Easter Sunday Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day July 4th. Labor Day . First Monday in September Veteran's Day November 11 Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Post Thanksgiving Day Friday immediately after Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day December 25 When New Year's Day, Independence Day, Veteran's Day, or Christmas Day fall on Saturday, the preceding Friday is the paid holiday, and should these days fall on Sunday, the following Monday shall be the paid holiday. Also, one -half day December 24th and December 31 st shall be the paid holidays whenever they fall on one of the. days Monday through Friday. 20.2 Employees working an eight (8) hour day shall receive the holidays in 20.1 with pay, provided, however, that Employees may be scheduled to work on paid holidays when the nature of their duties or other conditions so require. Employees scheduled to work on paid holidays shall receive an additional one and one half (1 -1/2) times their regular rate of pay for the number of hours actually worked on the given holiday. 20.3 Employees working other than an eight (8) hour day shall receive neither pay nor time off for those holidays listed in 20.1. However, each member shall be given six (6) floating holidays which they may schedule utilization of in the same Page 13 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 manner as vacation. There shall be no accrual from year to year. Should a person not desire to utilize the time off, the City shall purchase the unused days at one additional full time pay for each day not utilized up to a maximum of the six (6) days granted peryear. The cash out, if chosen; of these, days shall be done twice during the year. After June-1 an Employee can cash out a maximum of three (3) floating holidays. After December 1 and before December 31 an Employee can cash out the remaining floating holidays. Floating holidays: Employees . who are not actively employed with the City twelve (12) months in any calendar year (new hires, leaving,employment with less than twelve (12) months in the calendar year, leave of absence) shall be granted their floating holidays in accordance. with pro -rated ratio of one day for every 2.0 months of service, or portion thereof. 20.4 The Employer, in its discretion, may grant a holiday to individual Employees for the celebration of certain religious Holy Days observed by their particular faith. 20.5 Those Employees assigned to shifts who are not scheduled or assigned to work on the following days but are called back shall receive an additional half (1/2) time pay over the one and a half (1 1/2) times for overtime for those hours actually worked on the following days: January 1 Third Monday in January Third Monday in February Friday immediately preceding Easter Easter Sunday Last Monday in May July 4 First Monday in September November 11 Fourth Thursday in November Friday immediately after the fourth Thursday in November December 24 after 1200 December 25 December 31 after 1200 For the purpose of this 20.5, the holiday is from 0001 to 2400 of the day of the holiday. 20.6 Those individuals who are scheduled to work between midnight and midnight on July 4, Thanksgiving Day, December 25 and January 1 shall receive an additional one half time pay for those hours actually worked. Page 14 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1.275 January 1, 2010 ARTICLE XXI UNIFORMS Uniform items will be provided and replaced as determined by the Employer. A list of those uniform items that are authorized for use shall be kept by the staff officer designated by the Fire Chief to be responsible for uniform items. Authorization for new or replacement uniform items rests exclusively with the Employer.. ARTICLE XXII FITNESS INCENTIVE Eligibility for the Employees fitness incentive shall be based upon the City of Edina Firefighter Fitness Incentive Program dated June 7, 1993. Employees eligible for the fitness incentive shall receive`not more than $630 per year to be applied to'the cost of dues or fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility or program. In no event shall the amount of the incentive paid exceed the actual cost of the dues, fees or program costs. Eligible Employees shall receive the fitness incentive in not more than two payments to be issued within three weeks after submission to the Employer of evidence required by the Fitness Incentive Program. ARTICLE XXIII INSURANCE 23.1 The Employer will provide the same increase in EMPLOYER contribution as is given to all other City employees. Each year after the contribution is determined; the City will provide a Memo of Understanding to the Union stating the contribution amount. 23.2 The Employer agrees to provide a $70,000.00 accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy, the cost of which is to be shared in the following manner: Employee shall pay $10.00 per year, the Employer shall pay the remaining cost of the premium. 24.1 Any and all prior Agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules, and any regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, are hereby superseded. 24.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All Agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this Agreement ' -for the stipulated duration of this Agreement. The Employer and the Association ach voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this Agreement or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this Agreement, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the Page 15 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE XXV LONGEVITY AND EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE 25.1 Eligible Employees shall receive bi- weekly longevity payment, calculated based on the employee's current step (Job Classification and Year) in Appendix A -1 according to the following schedule: } From the end of the 5th year to the end of the 9th year 4% From the end of the 9th year to the end of the 13th year 5% From the, end of the 13th year to the end of the 17th year 6% From the end, of the 17th year on 7% 25.2 Educational Incentive Pay Plan dated August 6,,1975. Employees eligible for educational incentive pay who were members of the Association prior to June 7, 1993, shall receive bi- weekly educational incentive payment of six percent calculated based on the employee's current step (Job Classification and Year) in Appendix A -1. Employees eligible for education incentive pay who were not members of the Association prior to June 7, 1993, shall receive bi- weekly educational incentive payment of three percent calculated based on the employee's current step (Job Classification and Year) in Appendix A -1. Employees who were not members of the Association prior to May 1, 1995, shall not be eligible for educational incentive pay. 25.3 An Employee can receive only longevity or educational incentive but not both. Election as to which program to participate in may be done no more than once annually and shall be effective on the date of approval by the City Manager. 25.4 All Employees shall be eligible for participation in the City's Training and Education program as from time to time amended and as described in the City of Edina Employee Handbook. 25.5 An Employee will receive an additional payment as identified in Appendix A -1, upon successful completion of a fire services technology AAS Degree from an institution or equivalent program approved bythe Fire Chief. This section is not subject to the provisions of Section 25.3 of this Agreement. ARTICLE XXVI PARAMEDIC CERTIFICATION INCENTIVE Any Employee who is permanently assigned to a position other than firefighter /paramedic shall receive paramedic certification pay in accordance with Appendix A provided that the Employee maintains in full force and effect the same paramedic certification required by the Employer for Employees assigned as firefighters /paramedics. Page 16 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010- ARTICLE XXVII INJURY IN LINKOF DUTY 27.1 Employees injured while on duty shall be paid the difference between the Employee's regular rate of pay and any Worker's 'Compensation benefits for a period not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days. The Employee shall endorse his/her Worker's Compensation check to the City which shall reimburse the Employee at full regular pay. Such time shall not be charged against the Employee's sick or vacation leave. 27.2 Such injury -on -duty pay, shall be granted only to Employees certified by the Worker's Compensation carrier as. being incapacitated as a result of injury incurred through no misconduct of their own while on the actual performance of City assigned duties and only during the period they remain so certified. 27.3 The City Manager shall have the discretion to require an injured Employee to submit to a medical examination by competent medical authority approved by the City to determine if the Employee is capable and qualified to return to any assigned City duties commensurate with his/her capabilities. 27.4 To qualify for such compensation an Employee shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act. ARTICLE XXVIII FUNERAL LEAVE Sick leave with pay may be used for funeral leave purposes at the time of death of Employee's spouse, children, father, mother, spouse's father or mother, grandchildren, ,brother, sister, grandparents, and resident members of the Employee's household. The amount in any case, to be determined'by the City Manager, but not less than three (3) calendar days for Employee's spouse, children, father, or mother. ARTICLE XXIX, SEVERANCE PAY Effective May 1, 2011, this Article applies only to those employees hired before May 1, 2011, and those who do not choose the City's policy to buy back sick leave. See Appendix A -2. Employees who leave employment in good standing with the City, upon completion of at least 15 years continuous employment with the City, or who become totally and permanently disabled as determined by PERA under PERA rules, or who are permanently laid off shall receive a maximum of 6 weeks pay to be issued upon such termination. A person may only receive such payment once from the City. ARTICLE XXX PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES Promotions shall be based on job relevant qualifications. Seniority shall be the determining criterion for promotions when the job relevant qualifications between qualified Employees are equal. Page 17 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 ARTICLE XXXI DURATION This Agreement shall be effective as of the first day of January 2013 and shall remain in full . force and effect until the 31st day of December 2014. It shall be automatically renewed from year to year thereafter unless either party shall notify the other in writing of its intent to.terminate. ARTICLE XXXII LICENSURE . The City will pay the license fee for all employees covered by this contract. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this day of 2012. For the CITY OF EDINA: For the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 1275 Page 18 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 APPENDIX A -1 - SALARY SCHEDULE Firefighter: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014, Year 1 $60,269 $60,269 $38,443 $38,827 $39,216 Year 2 $63,644 $64,917 $47,150 $47,622 $48,098 Year 3 $66,207 $67,531 $55,217 $55,769 $56,327 Year 4 $70,082 $71,484 $57,705 $58,282 $58,865 Year 5 $72,441 $73,890 $62,723 $63,350 $63,984 Year 6 $72,804 $74,260 $63,037 $63,667 $64,304 Year 7 $73,532 $7503 $63,352 $63,986 $64,625 Firefighter/Lieutenant 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year 1 $60,269 $60,269 $61,173 $61,785 $62,403 Year 2 $63,644 $64,917 $65,891 $66,550 $67,215 Year 3 $66,207 $67,531 $67,531 $68,206 $68,888 Year 4 $70,082 $71,484 $72,556 $73,282 $74,014 Year 5 $72,441 $73,890 $74,998 $75,748 $76,505 Year 6 $72,804 $74,260 $75,347 $76,100 $76,861 Year 7 $73,532 $7503 $76,128 $76,889 $77,658 Year 8 $74,268 $75,753 $76,889 $77,658 $78,434 Firefighter/Inspector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year 1 $58,772 $58,772 $59,654 $60,251 $60,853 Year 2 $62,104 $63,346 $64,296 $64,939 $65,588 Year 3 $64,617 $65,909 $66,898 $67,567 $68,243 Year 4 $68,614 $69,784 $70,831 $71,539 $72,255 Year 5 $70,727 $72,142 $73,224 $73,956 $74,696 Year 6 $71,081 $72,503 $73,591 $74,327 $75,070 Year 7 $71,792 $73,228 $74,327 $75,070 $75,821 Year 8 $72,510 $73,960. $75,070 $75,821 $76,579 Firefighter/Paramedic 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year 1 $56,005 $56,005 $56,845 $57,413 $57;988 Year 2 $60,837 $62,054 $62,985 $63,615 $64,251 Year 3 $63,350 $64,617 $65,586 $66,242 $66,904 Year 4 $68,416 $69,784 $70;831 $71,539 $72,255 Page 19 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 Year 5 $70,727 $72,142 $73,224 $73,956 $74,696 Year 6 $71,081 $72,603 $73,591 $74,327 $75,070 Year 7 $71,792 $73,228 . $74,327 $75,070 $75,821 Year 8 $72,51-0_:, $73,960 $75,070 $75,821 $76,579 APPENDIX A -1 SALARY SCHEDULE • 1% increase to all steps (Years) in 2013 • 1% increase to all steps (Years) in 2014 Supplemental: Paramedic Certification Pay for Lieutenants and Inspectors = $1,463.81. Supplemental: Education incentive under 25.5 for all Job Classifications is $1675.00 Working out of classification: ➢ Acting Fire Lieutenant or Inspector — 100% of the pay of the Classification ➢ Acting Shift Officer - $1.25 per hour in addition to the employee's hourly pay rate ➢ FTO - $1.50 per hour in addition to the employee's hourly pay rate Page 20 of 22 /r Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 APPENDIX A -2 POLICY FOR THE PAYMENT OF UNUSED SICK LEAVE This policy is hereby adopted by the City Council pursuant to Section 150,(Personnel Policy) of the City Code. The purpose of this policy is to provide monetary compensation to regular full time employees of the City for a portion of their unused sick leave. This payment will be made at the time of separation for employment. This policy is designed to phase out severance payments now provided to employees who voluntarily resign after 15 years of service. Effective Date This policy is effective for regular full '-time employees who leave employment with the City on' January 1, 2011, or thereafter. Eligible Employees Only current, regular full time employees as defined by Section 150 of the City Code who have completed their probationary period and leave employment with the City in good standing as defined by 150.16 of the Code are eligible. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement are not eligible unless this policy is included as a provision in their collective bargaining agreement. Payment for Unused Sick Leave Upon separation from regular full -time employment with the City, an eligible employee shall receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of his or her accrued and unused sick leave as of the date of separation. The maximum number of hours subject to this payment shall not exceed 960 hours; (i.e. 1,920 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50% ='.960 hours). With regard to the employees working other than 40 hours, their payment for unused sick leave shall not exceed 1,440 hours (2,880 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50 %). The payment shall be based upon the employee's rate of pay at the time of separation. The payment shall be made within 30 days of separation. Severance Payments /Option of Current Employees Section 150 of the City Code provides for six weeks severance pay for regular full time employees who leave employment, in good standing, after 20 years of service. No employee hired after May 1, 2011, will be eligible for this severance payment. Persons who are regular full -time employees on May 1, 2011, may choose to either i) accept six weeks severance pay after 20 years of service or ii) accept a payment for unused sick leave as prescribed by this policy. Under no circumstances will an employee be eligible for both payments unless employment ends due to total and permanent disability or due to a permanent layoff as provided for in Section 150 of the Code. Current employees must select the option described above no later than May 1, 2011. Employees who fail to select an option will automatically be converted to the payment for unused sick leave option and will not be eligible for severance pay upon separation. Page 21 of 22 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2010 APPENDIX A -3 POLICY FOR A HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN Statement of Purpose The Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP) is a program that allows. City of Edina regular full -time employees to set aside their severance benefit into an account to pay medical expenses and/or health insurance premiums after they are no longer employed by the City. Employees can choose between investment options provided by the plan administrator. Assets in the account accumulate tax -free and, since payouts. are used for qualified medical expenses, they remain tax - free. This Policy amends the Policy for payment of unused sick leave adopted September 7, 1999. Program Severance payments upon termination of employment will be used to fund the HCSP. • Employees with less than five .years of service do not participate in the HCSP. • For all employees with more than five years of service participation in the HCSP is mandatory. • Employees eligible to receive -a payment for unused sick leave at termination of employment must contribute the entire sick leave portion of their severance to the HCSP account up to a maximum of 960 hours. • Employees eligible to receive six weeks severance pay at termination instead of payment for sick leave must contribute the entire six weeks severance payment to their HCSP account. Eligibility Effective April 1, 2003, this program applies to all regular full time non -union employees. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement are not eligible unless this policy is included as a provision in their collective bargaining agreement. Plan Administration Information The HCSP is administered by Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS). Information regarding MSRS and the administration of the plan is available at: http://www.msrs.state.mn.us/hcsp/indes.htmls\ Adopted by the City Council on March 18, 2003 Page 22 of 22 Item No. V.A. Robotic Day Proclamation Revised PROCLAMATION ROBOTICS DAY IN THE CITY OF EDINA Whereas: FIRST is an organization that seeks to inspire school students to be science and technology leaders through an exciting competition- based, after - school activity; and Whereas: During the last ten years the number of active FIRST robotics teams in the Edina School District has grown from one high school team with 16 students, to 18 teams active at all levels from kindergarten to high school and serving more than ISO students; and Whereas: At the elementary school level, FIRST Lego League and now Junior FIRST LEGO League, have grown over 7 years from 2 teams to 10 teams taking part in this year's competition; and Whereas: At the middle school level, FIRST Tech Challenge, has grown over 7 years from I team to 7 teams taking part in this year's competition; and Whereas: The FIRST Robotics Competition is now a Minnesota State High School League program, the first such state- sanctioned program for high school robotics teams, setting an example for the rest of the nation; and Whereas: This year Edina, for the first time, hosts a FIRST Tech Challenge competition, a FIRST Lego League tournament, and the inaugural Junior FIRST Lego League Expo in the Twin Cities metropolitan area all on the same day at Edina High School and Valley-View Middle School; and Whereas: All FIRST teams seek to make STEM a more integral and celebrated part of our community. With all of the challenges we now face as a nation, the FIRST Robotics program continues to be a vital to our community's future well -being and prosperity. Now, therefore, the City Council of Edina, does hereby proclaim Saturday, December 13, 2014, as ROBOTICS DAY IN THE CITY OF EDINA In witness thereof, I have here unto set by hand this 2nd day of December, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: 12/2/14 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC,HEARING - Review of 2015 Operating Budget Action Requested: Hold public hearing on 2015 operating budget Information / Background: The City started the 2014 -2015 Budget development process early in 2013 and on December 17, 2013, Council adopted the 2014 -2015 Budget. The rationale behind a two -year budget is to spend more time in the second year working on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and less time making changes to the operating budget. The City has followed that plan during 2014, making relatively minor changes to the 2015 budget while reviewing all the details of the CIP. Important dates for the 2015 Budget and CIP process were: • May 2014 public engagement starts on Speak Up, Edina! • May 28, 2014 Executive Leadership Team (ELT) staff meeting was the official kickoff for staff level work on the process. • August 19, 2014 work session, Council and staff discussed the budget and CIP process and targets. • On September 16, 2014, Council adopted a preliminary tax'levy. • October- November 2014 the City solicits resident feedback through Speak Up, Edina! and a paper survey. • November 18, 2014 work session, Council and staff review the staff recommended CIP. • December 2, 2014, Council holds a public hearing on the proposed 2015 Budget and levy. • December 16, 2014, Council is required to adopt a final 2015 Budget and levy. The final levy may be lower, but cannot be any higher than the preliminary levy adopted in September. The proposed 2015 Budget and levies are similar to the 2015 Budget and levies originally proposed in the 2014 -2015 Budget; however, some items have changed due to changes that were not known and /or predicted when the 2014 -2015 Budget was originally adopted in late 2013. Changes include: • Addition of a new $1,168,000 levy for debt service payments on the Braemar ,Field /Backyard /Pamela Park improvement project. • Addition of a new fund and budget for operations at the new Braemar Field facility. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • Increased estimates for building permit revenue and for expenditures to provide inspection services. • Restored previous cuts:to the equipment replacement program. • Updated capital improvement, maintenance, and repair expenditures to align the 2015 Budget with the staff recommended 2015 -2019 CIP. Additional Information / Background: Proposed 2015 Budget General Fund Levies General Operating Levy General Fund Subtotal Increase From Prior Year ( %) Arts and Culture Fund Levies Arts and culture Arts and Culture Fund Subtotal Increase From Prior Year ( %) Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service Equipment Certificates Gymnasium Debt Service Fire Station Debt Service Public Works Facility Debt Service Sports Dome NOTE 2 Park Bond Market Value Levy Debt Service Fund Subtotal Increase From Prior Year ( %) Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy Construction Fund Subtotal Increase From Prior Year ( %) Total Property Tax Levy Increase From Prior Year ( %) Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE i CITY OF EDINA Proposed Tax Levies 20,000 949,850 950,800 Budget Budget 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . $ 21,004,000 $ 21,604,402 $ 21,824,894 $ 22,509,403 $ 22,933,958 21,004,000 21,604,402 21,824,894 22,509,403 22,933,958 1.29% 2.86% 1.02% 3.14% 1.89% 20,000 949,850 950,800 949,850 947,600 944,400 164,010 67,500 - - - 396,444 411,644 396,444 409,244 409,440 431,544 432,744 431,544 441,944 441,940 1,232,460 1,178,202 1,536,743 1,526,809 1,546,600 - - - - 1,168,000 615,837 610,862 615,837 627,800 618,600 3,790,145 3,651,752 3,930,418 3,953,397 5,128,980 -0.65% -3.65% 7.63% 0.58% 29.74% NOTE 2 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 5.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 63.00% $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 $ 26,747,384 $ 27,454,872 $ 29,700,010 1.15% 1.79% 1.90% 2.65% 8.18% NOTE 2 1.12% 1.86% 1.93% 2.66% 8.40% NOTE 2 NOTE 1: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station, public works and sports dome levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from the calculation of "Tax Capacity Levy Increase ". This explains why Tax Capacity Levy Increase does not equal Total Property Tax Levy Increase. NOTE 2: The City began working on construction and financing for a Sports Dome in fall 2013. Accurate figures were not available when the City adopted the 2014 -2015 budget in fall 2013 so the numbers in that document are different from the numbers shown here. 11/22/2014 CITY OF EDINA Consolidated Proposed Budget EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 2012 2013 2014 20,380,412 Actual Actual Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1,210,257 Human resources Property tax levy $ 25,838,422 $ 26,891,756 $ 27,454,872 Reductions - - (119,000) Net tax revenue 25,838,422 26,891,756 27,335,872 Tax increments 3,536,935 3,981,938 3,900,000 Franchise fees 815,530 1,891,967 2,070,000 Special assessments 4,975,641 4,884,510 3,321,571 Licenses and permits 3,155,351 4,150,512 3,302,865 Intergovernmental 2,269,610 2,998,553 4,574,189 Charges for services 3,708,482 3,667,612 4,182,766 Fines and forfeitures 1,195,054 1,109,710 950,000 Operating revenue 39,033,106 39,750,384 41,761,604 Investment income 455,163 (174,238) 447,531 Other revenue 4,905,768 1,661,579 568,277 Debt issued 5,174,868 8,480,026 2,917,200 Other financing sources 94,975 62,428 - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER 10,635,139 Personal services 28,346,413 FINANCING SOURCES $ 95,158,905 $ 99,356,737 $ 95,331,875 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 19,965,670 $ 18,058,543 $ 20,380,412 Communications & tech. 1,041,718 1,182,968 1.7% 1,210,257 Human resources 445,893 905,157 827,487 Finance 717,345 782,101 2,070,000 1,187,619 Public works 20,110,754 21,351,477 20.2% 22,567,897 Engineering 7,846,862 6,498,786 52:5% 9,330,550 Police 10,298,379 10,514,059 11,693,713 Fire 6,264,920 6,685,619 950,000 7,1 19,458 Parks & recreation 10,837,727 12,494,013 2.5% 12,134,136 Community development 1,368,336 1,637,815 -65.8% 1,700,031 Debt service 8,9,12,394 16,801,634 6,008,988 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER - 100.0% - FINANCING USES $ 87,809,998 $ 96,912,172 $ 94,160,548 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE $ Cost of goods sold $ 10,119,193 $ 10,480,175 $ 10,635,139 Personal services 28,346,413 30,245,255 695,637 32,187,018 Contractual services 13,987,902 14,641,036 0.3% 14,502,510 Commodities 3,586,889 3,676,301 43.6% 3,799,139 Central services 4,374,753 4,822,787 5,040,600 Equipment 1,308,222 1,043,676 7,134,947 2,138,140 Capital outlay 12,314,221 9,646,531 9.2% 14,029,000 Depreciation 3,958,490 4,522,688 -64.2% 4,937,850 Debt service 9,813,915 17,833,723 $ 6,891,152 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER 1.5% FINANCING USES $ 87,809,998 $ 96,912,172 $ 94,160,548 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 1.8% -0.9% 14,253,910 OR NET POSITION $ 7.348.907 $ 2,444,565 $ 1.171.327 2015 Budget 2.1% $ 29,700,010 8.2% NA (123,000) 3.4% 1.7% 29,577,010 8.2% -2.1% 100,000 -97.4% 9.4% 2,070,000 0.0% -32.0% 3,992,997 20.2% -20.4% 3,880,080 17.5% 52:5% 5,169,825 13.0% 14.0 %. 4,019,494 -3.9% -14.4% 950,000 0.0% 5.1% 42,823,745 2.5% - 356.9% 463,956 3.7% -65.8% 1,188,448 109.1% -65.6% 4,599,895 57.7% - 100.0% - NA -4.1% $ 98,835,450 3.7% 12.9% $ 17,960,549 -11.9% 2.3% 1,506,574 24.5% -8.6% 695,637 -15.9% 51.8% 1,191,299 0.3% 5.7% 22,913,578 1.5% 43.6% 13,926,591 49.3% 11.2% 11,764,823 0.6% 6.5% 7,134,947 0.2% -2.06 13,244,427 9.2% 3.8% 1,742,160 2.5% -64.2% 6,654,894 10.7% -2.8% $ 98,735,479 4.9% 1.5% $ 10,696,828 0.6% 6.4% 32,759,604 1.8% -0.9% 14,253,910 -1.7% 3.3% 3,853,162 1.4% 4.5% 5,154,924 2.3% 104.9% 1,746,978 -18.3% 45.4% 17,395,224 24.0% 9.2% 5,471,750 10.8% -61.4% 7,403,099 7.4% -2.8% $ 98,735,479 4.9% 4 Q9 071 11/2212014 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Budget by Fund Type 2014 Budget 2015 Budget Other financing sources - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 53,868,884 $ 43,983,691 $ 97,852,575 Governmental Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 29,700,010 Property tax levy $ 27,454,872 $ (123,000) $ 27,454,872 Reductions (119,000) 100,000 (119,600 Net tax revenue 27,335.872 Human resources 27,335,872 Tax increments 3,900,000 3,992,997 3,900,000 Franchise fees 2,070,000 5,053,825 2,070,000 Special assessments 3,321,571 - 3,321,571 Licenses and permits 3,302,865 950,000 3,302,865 Intergovernmental 4,032,189 542,000 4,574,189 Charges for services 4,182,766 . - 4,182;766 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - 950,000 Operating revenue - 41,761,604 41,761,604 Investment income 327,400 120,131 447,531 Other revenue 513,921 54,356 568,277 Transfers 1,015,100 1,505,600 2,520,700 Debt issued 2,917,200 - 2,917,200 Other financing sources - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 53,868,884 $ 43,983,691 $ 97,852,575 Governmental Enterprise BY FUNCTION Funds Funds Total Administration $ $ 29,700,010 $ $ 29,700,010 (123,000) 12,506,524 $ (123,000) 29,577,010 1,210,257 29,577,010 100,000 1,506,574 100,000 2,070,000 Human resources 2,070,000 3,992,997 827,487 3,992,997 3,880,080 695,637 3,880,080 5,053,825 116,000 5;169,825 4,019,494 - 4,019,494 950,000 - 950,000 - 42,823,745 42,823,745 327,400 136,556 463,956 .1,128,921 59,527 1,18 &448 1,065,100 1,212,178 2,277,278 4,599,895 - 4,599,895 $ 56,764,722 $ 44,348,006 $ 101,112,728 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION $ 96,681,248 $ Administration $ 8,116,558 $ 12,263,854 $ 20,380,412 $ 5,454,025 $ 12,506,524 $ 17,960,549 Communication & tech. 1,210,257 1,210,257 1,506,574 - 1,506,574 Human resources 827,487 $ 827,487 695,637 - 695,637 Finance 909,509 278,110 1,187,619 904,918 286,381 1,191,299 Public works 9,492,615 13,075,282 22,567,897 9,563,518 13,350,060 22,913,578 Engineering 9,154,550 176,000 9,330,550 13,749,591 177,000 13,926,591 Police 11,264,011 429,702 11,693,713 11,323,415 441,408., 11,764,823 Fire 7,1'19,458 - 7,1 19,458 7,134,947 - 7,134,947 Parks & recreation 1,690,639 10,443,497 12,134,136 2,654,087 10,590,340 13,244,427 Community development 1,700,031 - 1,700,031 1,742,160 - 1,742,160 Debt service 6,008,988 - 6,008,988 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers 620,600 1,900,100 2,520,700 327,178 1,950,100 2,277,278 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 58,114,703 $ 38,566,545 $ 96,681,248 $ 61,710,944 $ 39,301,813 $ 101,012,757 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ - $ 10,635,139, $ 10,635,139 $ - $ 10,696,828 $ 10,696,828 Personal services 24,303,226 7,883,792 32,187,018 25,023,800 7,735,804 32,759,604 Contractual services 5,390,523 9,11 1,987 14,502,510 4,822,492 9,431,418 14,253,910 Commodities 1,844,514 1,954,625 3,799,139 1,880,062 1,973,100 3,853,162 Central services 3,779,712 1,260,888 5,040,600 3,860,316 1,294,608 5,154,924 Equipment 2,138,140 - 2,138,140 1,746,978 - 1,746,978 Capital outlay 14,029,000 - 14,029,000 17,395,224 - 17,395,224 Depreciation - 4,937,850 4,937,850 - 5,471,750 5,471,750 Debt service 6,008,988 882,164 6,891,152 6,654,894 748,205 7,403,099 Transfers 620,600 1,900,100 2,520,700 327,178 1,950,100 2,277,278 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 58,114,703 $ 38,566,545 $ 96,681,248 $ 61,710,944 $ 39,301,813 $ 101,012,757 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION $ (4,245,819) $ 5,417,146 $ 1,171,327 $ (4,946,222) $ 5,046,193 $ 99,971 11/22/2014 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Governmental Fund Budgets FUND BALANCE $ - $ (3.615,787) $ (351,303) $ - $ 112,446 $ (232,800) $ 20,093 $ 577,785 $ (518,951) $ (937,705) $ . (4,946,222) 11/22/2014 2015 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS - Braemar Arts & Debt 'Environmental General HRA PACs CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction' Fund Fund `Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES - - - Propertyaxlevy $ 22,933,958 $ - $ - $ = $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 5,128,980 - -$ - $ 1,617,072 $ 29,700,010 Reductions (123,000) (123,000) Net tax revenue 22,810,958 20,000 5;128,980 1,617,072 29,577,010 Tax Increments - 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Franchise fees 770,000 - 1.200,000 - 100,000 2,070,000 Special assessments - - - - - - 2,083,699 - 1,909,298 3,992,997 Licenses and permits 3,830,080 - - - - - - - 50,000 3,880,08D Intergovernmental 1,113,500 - - 100,000. 115,325 - - - - 3,725,000 5,053,825 Charges for servkas 3,969,494 - - - - - - - 50,000 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - - - - - - - - - 950,000 Investment income 150,000 94,000 - - - - 3D0 200 - 20,000 62,900 - 327,400 Other revenue 461,100 - 57,821 7,000 23,000 - 580,000 1,128,921 Transfers 765,100 - - - - - - - 300,000 1,065,100 Debt Issued - - - - - - - - - 4,599,895 4,599,895 Other financing sources - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER ' FINANCING SOURCES $ 34,820,232 $ 194,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 100,000 $ 173,446 $ 7,200 $ ' 43,000 $ 7,232,679 $ - $ 12,994,165 $ 56,764,722 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 1,619,238 $ 3,809,787 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - E - $ 25,000 $ 5,454,025 Communication & tech. 1,040,674 - - - - - - - 465,900 1,506574 Human resources 695,637 - - - - - - - - - 695,637 Finance 904,918 - - - - - - - - - 904,918 Public works 8,459,610 - - - - - - - 327,036 776,872 9,563518 Engineering 1,735,095 - 1,551,303 - - - - - - 10,463,193 13.749591 Police 10,357,415 - - - 61,000 - - - - 905,000 11,323,415 Fire 7,007,398 - - - - - - - 41,000 86,549 7,134,947 Parks & recreation 1,388,087 - - - - 240,000 22,907 - 150,915 852,178 2,654,087 Community development 1,612,160 - - 100,000 - - - - - 30,000 1,742,160 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - - 6,654,894 Transfers 327,178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820,232 $ 3,809,787 $ 1,551,303 $ 100,000 $ 61,000 $ 240,000 $ 22,907 $ 6,654,894 $ 518,951 $ 13.931,870 $ 61,710,944 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $ 24,798,774 $ 118,467 $ - $ - $ _ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,559 $ 25,023,800 Contractual seMces 4,469594 6,120 23,000 100,000 56,000 - 21,057 - - 146,721 4,822,492 Commodities 1,773,292 200 28,000 - 5,000 - 1,850 - - 71,720 1,880,062 Central services 3.778,572 - 81,744 - - - - - - - 3,860,316 Equipment - - - 40,000 - - 180,606 1,526,372 1,746,978 Capital outlay - - 3,685,000 1,418,559 - - 200,000 - 338,345 11,753,320 17,395,224 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers 327,178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820,232 $ 3,809,787 $ 1,551,303 $ 100,000 $ 61,000 $ 240,000 $ 22,907 $ 6,654,894 $ 518,951 $ 13,931,870 $ 61,710,944 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ - $ (3.615,787) $ (351,303) $ - $ 112,446 $ (232,800) $ 20,093 $ 577,785 $ (518,951) $ (937,705) $ . (4,946,222) 11/22/2014 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Enterprise Fund Budgets CHANGE IN NET POSITION $ 5,347,707 $ 10,494 $ 84,375 $ 140,269 $ (176,437) $ (172,230) $ 9,222 $ 6,653 $ (203,860) $ 5,046,193 11/22/2014 2015 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS Aquatic Golf Sports Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues $ 19,433.473 $ 14,367,118 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,014,025 $ 2,017,519 $ 381,860 $ 445,950 $ 1,354,800 $ 786,000 $ 42,823,745 Intergovernmental 116,000 116,000 Investment income 96,556 - 15,000 25,000 136,556 Other revenue 56,527 - 3,000 - - 59,527 Transfers 485,000 230.000 24578 253,600 1,212,178 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 19,702,556 $ 14,367,118 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,499.025 $ 2,247,519 $ 381,860 $ 692,528 $ 1.623.400 $ 811,000 $ 44,348,006 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ $ 12,506,524 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 12,506.524 Finance 286,381 286.381 Public works 13.350,060 13,350,060 Engineering 177,000 177,000 Police 441,408 441,408 Parks and recreation - - 938.625 3,358,756 2,423,956 554,090 683,306 1,616,747 1,014,860 10,590,340 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625, $ 3,358,756 $ 2,423,956 $ 554,090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,301,813 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ $ 10,198,628 $ 46,000 $ 225,200 $ 85,000 $ $ 23,000 $ 105,000 $ 14,000 $ 10,696,828 Personal services 1,732.897 1.419,298 371,593 1,453,368 885,513 54,440 449.431 745,581 623,683 7.735.804 Contractual services 6,723,540 522,928 162.300 596.800 612,750 171,650 101,175 362,650 177,625 9,431,418 Commodities 999,500 63,150 89.650 380,800 96,950 3,000 48,300 183,450 108,300 1,973,100 Central services 708,588 227,520 27,108 132.588 58,836 - 35,400 53,316 51.252 1,294,608 Depreciation 3,487,500 75,000 236.500 570.000 545,000 325,000 26,000 166,750 40.000 5,471,750 Interest 602,824 - 5.474 - 139,907 - - - - 748,205 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625 $ 3,358,756 $ 2,423,956 $ 554,090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,301,813 CHANGE IN NET POSITION $ 5,347,707 $ 10,494 $ 84,375 $ 140,269 $ (176,437) $ (172,230) $ 9,222 $ 6,653 $ (203,860) $ 5,046,193 11/22/2014 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: A. B. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action IR Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — 2015 Building Fees & Liquor License Fees, Ordinance No. 2014 -21 Amending Section 2 -724 Schedule A Setting Fees For 2015 Action Requested: Hold a public hearing on the proposed fees and charges. Adopt Ordinance 2014 -21 Amending Code Section 2 -724 Schedule A Setting Fees for 2015, including waiver of second reading. Information / Background: Attached are schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance proposed for 2015. The fees that are proposed to change from 2014 to 2015 are in bold. Utility fees are proposed as presented in the Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Utility Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates and discussed by the City Council at the October 14, 2013 work session. 2015 water rates from the City of Minneapolis have not been received; therefore Morningside rates will be set at a later City Council meeting. Attachments Ordinance No. 2014 -21 Amending Section 2 -724 Schedule A Setting Fees for 2015 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2014-21 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 2 -724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter and Purpose of Fee /Charge 2014 Fee Proposed 2015 Fee Section Chapter 4 4 -29 Liquor license fees (per year) $8,850.00 On -sale intoxicating $8,875.00 On -sale intoxicating license, restaurants license, restaurants only only $670.00 3.2 beer license off- or $680.00 3.2 beer license off- or on -sale on -sale $95.00 Per event, temporary $100.00 Per event, temporary on -sale 3.2 malt liquor on -sale 3.2 malt liquor Chapter 10 10 -74 Building Permit $26.00 Then amount is: * $30.00 Then amount is: If total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $26.00 *For first $500.00, plus $30.00 *For first $500.00, plus $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $76.20 *For first $2,000.00, $80.25 *For first $2,000.00, plus plus $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $430.00 *For first $25,000.00, $436.75 *For first $25,000.00, plus plus $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $710.00 *For first $50,000.00, $711.75 *For first $50,000.00, plus plus $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,100.00 *For first $100,000.00, $ I,1 1 1.75 *For first $100,000.00, plus - plus $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,500.00 *For the first $3,511.75 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $500,000.00, plus $1,000,001.00 and up $6,000.00 *For the first $6,133.75 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $1,000,000.00, plus 10 -75 Other permit - related fees $68.00 Per hour or the total $100.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest whichever is greatest (includes supervision, (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and hourly wages and fringe benefits of fringe benefits of employees involved) employees involved) 10 -429 Plumbing or water conditioning permit $301.00 to $700.00 $20.00 *Plus 1.75% > $300.00 $20.00 *Plus 3.10% > $300.00 $701.00 to $1,000.00 $25.00 *Plus 3.10 %> $700.00 $25.00 *Plus 2.60 %> $700.00 $1,001.00 to $5,000.00 $35.00 *Plus 2.60 % $35.00 *Plus 2.15% > $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,001.00 to $10,000.00 $150.00 *Plus 2.15% > $150.00 *Plus 1.85% > $5,000.00, $5,000.00 $10,001.00 to $25,000.00 $265.00 *Plus 1.85% > $265.00 *Plus 1.75% > $10,000.00 $10,000.00 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION 10- Other permit- related fees $68.00 Per hour or the total $100.00 Per hour or the total 429(1) hourly cost to city, hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest whichever is greatest (includes supervision, (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and hourly wages and fringe benefits of fringe benefits of employees involved) employees involved) Chapter 18 18 -67(a) Operational permits required by $64.00 Per hour with a $75.00 Per hour with a MSFC § 105.6. minimum one hour fee minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, (includes supervision, code review, code review, inspections overhead, inspections overhead, hourly wages and hourly wages and fringe benefits of fringe benefits of employees involved) employees involved) Nonbusiness hours inspection $89.00 Per hour with a $100.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee minimum one hour fee 18- Fire alarm and alternative fire 195(a) suppression permit, if total valuation of work is: $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $8.00 For each additional $9.00 For each additional $1,000 or fraction $1,000 or fraction thereof to and thereof to and including $100,000.00 including $100,000.00 Chapter 24 24- Employee parking permit, NA $25.00 Per month 397(b) premium 24- Daily parking permit NA $10.00 Packet of 10 permits 397(f) Chapter 28 28 -43(b) Sewer Service: Based upon water usage during Based upon water usage during winter quarter (November I to winter quarter (November I to March 1) March 1) 1. Single- family, townhouses, $52.86 Per quarter to and $54.58 Per quarter to and two- family dwellings, apartment including 1,600 cubic including 1,600 cubic buildings containing four or less feet feet dwelling units $3.30 Additional from 1,601 $3.41 Additional from 1,601 cubic feet and over cubic feet and over 2. Apartment building with more $47.57 Per quarter for each $49.12 Per quarter foreach than four dwelling units unit over four; or unit over four; or $3.30 Per 100 cubic feet of $3.41 Per. 100 cubic feet of water used, whichever water used, whichever is greater is greater 3. Commercial and industrial $52.86 Per water meter or $54.58 Per water meter or buildings, including schools and approved sewage approved sewage churches metering device on metering device on premises; or premises; or $3.30 Per 100 cubic feet of $3.41 Per 100 cubic feet of water used during the water used during the quarter, whichever is quarter, whichever is greater greater Water Service. 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of $1.38 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.45 Up to 3,500 cubic feet city, except in the Morningside area $1.83 3,600 to 6,500 cubic feet $1.93 3,600 to 6,500 cubic feet $2.87 Over, 6,500 cubic feet $3.02 Over 6,500 cubic feet Page 3 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 2. Domestic accounts used by $1.38 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.45 Up to 3,500 cubic feet commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and $1.83 Over 3,500 cubic feet $1.93 Over 3,500 cubic feet churches 3. Lawn watering accounts used $1.83 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.93 Up to 3,500 cubic feet by commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and $2.87 Over 3,500 cubic feet $3.02 Over 3,500 cubic feet churches 4. Meter charge $16.81 Per.quarter for up to $17.69 Per quarter for up to 3/4 -inch meter 3/4 -inch meter $22.91 Per quarter for I -inch $24.12 Per quarter for I -inch meter meter $26.14 Per quarter for 11/4- $27.52 Per quarter for 1 1/4- inch meter inch meter $29.41 Per quarter for 11 /2- $30.95 Per quarter for 1 /z- inch meter inch meter $47.35 Per quarter for 2 -inch $49.84 Per quarter for 2 -inch meter meter $179.82 Per quarter for 3 -inch $189.26 Per quarter for 3 -inch meter. meter $228.89 Per quarter for 4 -inch $240.90 Per quarter for 4 -inch meter meter $290.06 Per quarter for 6 -inch $305.29 Per quarter for 6 -inch meter meter $368.36 Per quarter for 8 -inch $387.70 Per quarter for 8 -inch meter meter 28 -44(6) Surcharge when City not able to NA $50.00 Per quarter remove water meter for testing, calibration or replacement 28 -143 Charge for connection to city $1,000.00 Water connection $1,250.00 Water connection water or sewer system charge per REC unit x charge per REC unit x number of SAC units number of SAC units $500.00 Sewer connection $625.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit x charge per REC unit x number of SAC units number of SAC units 28 -208 Stormwater drainage charge $22.89 Per quarter pursuant $24.26 Per quarter pursuant 28 -209 to formula in section to formula in section 28 -208 28 -208 Chapter 36 36 -95 Variance fee $350.00 Residential $450.00 Residential $600.00 Commercial $700.00 Commercial 36 -193 Fee for transfer of land to $500.00 1. R -2 lot $600.00 1. R -2 lot another zoning district $ 1,100.00 All other transfers $1,200.00 All other transfers 36 -301 Conditional use permit $800.00 Fee shall be equal to $900.00 Fee shall be equal to city staff time city`staff time expended and city's expended and city's direct direct 36 -339 Final development plan $850.00 $950.00 application fee Page 4 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Section 2.' The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2015. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen -City Clerk James B. Hovland -Mayor To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendments For Building Height, Density And Floor Area Ratio; Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan , 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC, Resolution No. 2014 -150, & Resolution No. 2014 -151 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -150, denying the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -151, denying the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan. Planning Commission Recommendation: On November 12, 2014 the Planning Commission recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan: Vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays. The Planning Commission further recommended that a Small Area Plan be done on the OR, Office Residentially designated land on the west side of France Avenue. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of both requests. Information /Background: (February 1, 2015) The applicant, 7200 LLC is requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a four and five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including two restaurants and retail /office space. ➢ A two - level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail space would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72 "d Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A13 —A56 in the Planning Commission Staff Report and in the attached development plan book.) City . of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are required: ➢ Building Height —from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 76.5 feet. ➢ Housing Density —from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio —from .5 to 1.49. In addition, the following land use applications are requested: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Rezoning be approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Site Plan review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD District would be included in the second step. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the sketch plans on pages A57 —A61; and the minutes from those meetings on pages A62 —A67.) The applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council at Sketch Plan. Some of the most significant changes include: ➢ Reduction in the number of units from 195 to 160. ➢ Reducing the building height from 6 stories to 5; and reduced the townhome height on the west side from 4 to 3 stories. ➢ Reducing floor area ratio from 1.88 to 1.49. ➢ Increased the podium height on France by 10 feet. ➢ Increased landscaping. ➢ Created a green boulevard on 72 "d Street which serves to prevent left turn out movements from the site. This would eliminate some traffic in the in the low density residential area to the west. ➢ Increased the setback on the west boundary from 60 feet to 75 feet. ➢ Reduced the commercial space from 26,500 to 20,000 square feet. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014 -150 • Resolution No. 2014 -151 • Planning Commission minutes, November 12, 2014 • Planning Commission staff report dated November 12, 2014 ok e �tt RESOLUTION NO. 2014-150 RESOLUTION DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING HEIGHT,, DENSITY AND FLOOR AREA RATIO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND 1.01 7200 France LLC, is. requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear down the. existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a four and five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including ,two restaurants and retail/off. ce space. ➢ A two - level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail space would be off France Avenue. Access to. the residential use would be off 72 "d Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. 1.02 The, property is legally described as follows: See Exhibit A 1.03 The property is guided OR, office residential, under the City's Comprehensive plan. 1.04 To accommodate the proposed development, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 76.5 feet. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.49. 1.05 On November 12, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The Edina Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2008. The Plan was the subject of countless public meetings, public input, and public hearings. The building height limitations, housing density, and floor area ratio in the Plan were designed to maintain the character of existing. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 nr) 017 QQK1 - V.,., oc ,)_Q ,)4_ngon RESOLUTION NO. 2014-150 Page 2 in he Ci ided OR office residents neighborhoods. The proposed comprehensive plan amendments would not only affect the subject property but all property i t ty gu al. 2.02 The Applicant's desire to construct a' building that cannot be constructed without Comprehensive Plan amendments is not ,A sufficient reason to amend the Comprehensive Plan. 2.03 The Subject Property currently has reasonable uses and can be reasonably redeveloped without the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 2.04 proposed development:would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times . the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site. 2.05 The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan: A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed. 2.06 The proposed. building height is 28.5 feet taller than allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. 2.07 The proposed plan amendment is at best pre- mature given the Planning Commission's plan to study of the impact on greater'development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on the west side of France in this OR, Office Residential area. Section 3. DENIAL, The City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 179269v1 James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the, Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of.December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk 179269v1 911�� o e ,gym RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151. RESOLUTION- DENYING REZONING AND PRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENT.PLAN FOR 7200 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the: City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 7200 France LLC, is requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a four and five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including two restaurants and retail/ office space. ➢ A two- level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail space would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72na.Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See Exhibit A 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are required: ➢ Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. 1.04 On November 12, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 8 Ayes, 0. Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The City has denied the applicant's request to amend the Comprehensive Plan. 2.02 The proposed rezoning conflicts with the City's comprehensive plan for the following reasons: CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 01ZI_017_auri Fov QS�_R�F_f13q(1 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151 Page 2 1. The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site within the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed. 3. The proposed building height is 28.5 feet taller than allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. 4. This area on the west side of France Avenue is seen as a transition area from the low density residential to the west and the higher intensity commercial area on the east side of France. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as a "transitional area along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts." The proposed development is more for square footage than what would normally be allowed in the POD -1 Zoning District. 5. The proposal may set a precedent for similar development requests at this density. There are several properties within this OR, Office Residential area that have buildings in similar condition that may be ripe for redevelopment. 2.03 The Development Plan conflicts with both the City's POD -1 zoning of the property for the following reasons: 1. The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site within the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed building height is 28.5 feet and one story taller than allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed building does not meet the required side yard, front and side street setback requirements. 2.04 The proposed development is at best pre - mature given the Planning Commissions plan to study of the impact on greater development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on the west side of France in this OR, Office Residential area. Section 3. DENIAL The City Council of the City of Edina, denies the proposed Rezoning and Development Plan. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 179271v1 James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151 Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk 179271vl D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Planned unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan. 7200 France LLC. 720 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague told the Commission the applicant, 7200 LLC is requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a four and five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including two restaurants and retail /office space. ➢ A two - level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. Teague explained that the retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail space would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72nd Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. Planner Teague reported, to accommodate the request; three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are being required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 76.5 feet. ➢ Housing Density - from. 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio - from .5 to 1.49. In addition, the following land use applications are requested: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from POD- I, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Rezoning be approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Site Plan review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD District would be included in the second step. Planner Teague concluded while the project does contain a number of components that are desired in the Comprehensive Plan, however, due to the size of the project, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments based on the following findings: Page 7 of 13 I . The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site. 2. The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed 3. This area on the west side of France Avenue is seen as a transition area from the low density residential to the west and the higher intensity commercial area on the east side of France. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as a "transitional area along major thoroughfares or between higher - intensity districts and residential districts." The proposed development is more for square footage than what would normally be allowed in the POD -I Zoning District. 4. The proposal may set a precedent for similar development requests at this density. There are several properties within this OR, Office Residential area that have buildings in similar condition that may be ripe for redevelopment. 5. The proposed development is pre- mature given the Planning Commission's plan to study of the impact on greater development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on the west side of France in this OR, Office Residential area. 6. While the applicant has made positive improvements to reduce the size of the development proposed at the sketch plan; staff does not believe they have reduced the size of the development enough to provide a development that is more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The availability of access to France Avenue is questionable. If the County does not allow access, the plans may need to be revised. Teague reported because of the denial recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan amendments, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -I, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District Denial is subject to the following findings: I . The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site. 2. The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed 3. This area on the west side of France Avenue is seen as a transition area from the low density residential to the west and the higher intensity commercial area on the east side of France. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as a "transitional area along major thoroughfares or between higher - intensity districts and residential districts." The proposed development is more for square footage than what would normally be allowed in the POD -I Zoning District. 4. The proposal may set a precedent for similar development requests at this density. There are several properties within this OR, Office Residential area that have buildings in similar condition that may be ripe for redevelopment. Page 8 of 13 S. The proposed development is pre- mature given the Planning Commission's plan to study of the impact on greater development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on the west side of France in this OR, Office Residential area. 6. While the applicant has made positive improvements to reduce the size of the development proposed at the sketch plan; staff does not believe they have reduced the size of the development enough to provide a development that is more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The availability of access to France Avenue is questionable. If the County does not allow access, the plans may need to be revised. Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects Inc. and Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation. Discussion Commissioner Platteter asked if there was a link to the public park to the north. He noted at sketch plan review that possibility was mentioned. Planner Teague responded there is no link. Commissioner Olsen referred to the traffic study that indicated this project would have no impact on the neighborhood and asked if the study included impact and trespass into the neighborhood adjoining the site. Teague responded that movement was part of the traffic analysis. Applicant Presentation Dean Dovolis delivered a power point presentation highlighting aspects of the project that were modified from sketch plan review: • Building height reduced from 6 stories to 5 stories and reduced townhouses on the west from 4 to 3 stories. • Reduced unit count from 195 -units to 160- units. • Increase podium setback from France Avenue • Increase landscaping and setback along France • Introduce green boulevard on 72nd Street • Increase setback on the west from 60 to 75 -feet. • Reduce Floor Area Ratio (FAR) • Reduce commercial space from 26,500 to 20,000 sq. ft. Dovolis indicated commercial traffic would be off France Avenue; not 72 "d Street. Dovolis introduced Lori Boisclair to speak to the affordable portion of the project. Ms. Boisclair addressed the Commission and explained the project proposes 32 -units for people who meet certain income levels. Boisclair said this site is an excellent opportunity to provide housing for service workers. She concluded the site is uniquely situated for easy access to commercial areas; and public transportation. Page 9 of 13 Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked where the nearest bus stop was located. Mr. Dovolis responded the bus stop is located near Byerly's. Commissioner Platteter said his major concern is with an increase in traffic on both France Avenue and 72 "d Street. Dovolis said traffic is proposed to be split with residential traffic accessing off of West 72 "d Street and commercial off France Avenue via slip aisle. Platteter said he is concerned with the slip aisle and questioned if the project has the "go ahead" for access off France Avenue. Mr. Dovolis responded that the proposed slip aisle will take pressure off France Avenue, adding the development team feels confident Hennepin County will approve their request which is similar to the request they approved on the Byerly's site. Platteter further asked if there is a no build area on the west boundary. Dovolis said this site is unique and was given the gift of that green buffered area which will remain no- build. Commissioner Platter asked if storm water would be treated on site. Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Schroeder said from his point of view the development team hasn't made the case to support an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Dovolis said they believe their project does; adding it would benefit the neighborhood and City through sustainable design strategies, including efficient lighting, mechanical systems and rainwater harvesting. Continuing, Dovolis also noted that parking is contained within the building, landscaping is increased and affordable housing is front and center in this project. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Testimony The following addressed the Commission with concerns about the proposed project. Harvey Turner, 7315 Glouchester Drive addressed the Commission. Resident Oaklawn /72A Street, addressed the Commission. Cathy Campbell, 7201 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Commission. Tom O'Connell, 7333 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Commission. Joel Zaslofsky, 7124 Heatherton Trail, addressed the Commission. Jeanne Toia, 7210 Bristol Circle., addressed the Commission. John Doleijsi, 7216 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Commission. Ms. Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Commission. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Commission. Stan Zahorsky, addressed the Commission. Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Commission. Paul Hughes, 7208 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Commission. A resident, 4444 Dunham addressed the Commission. Page 10 of 13 The following also addressed the Commission Jack Rice, 4001 49`h Street West, addressed the Commission on the need for affordable housing in Edina. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Chair Staunton asked if retail parking meetings code. Dovolis responded that the site complies with code. Staunton asked Dovolis if he believes West 72 "d Street is wide enough to accommodate this development. Dovolis responded in his opinion it's wide enough Ed Tehar updated the Commission on the findings in the traffic analysis. Commissioner Carr asked Mr. Dovolis if the unit count can be reduced; adding if reduced many issues (traffic) would be reduced. She stated residents brought up very valid concerns, pointing out City staff cannot support the project as proposed. Mr. Dovolis said to achieve the 20% affordable housing component the density proposed is required. Commissioner Hobbs said he is new to this proposal; however, feels the City needs a more concrete vision on what they want to see on France Avenue. Hobbs stated France Avenue is very important, adding he can't support the request as submitted. Commissioner Lee said she has serious concerns about the project, adding one major concern of hers is with Hennepin County and lack of a final answer from them. She said at this time she can't support the project, Hennepin County hasn't given final approval for access; reiterating she can't comment on the project until all facts are known. Commissioner Platteter said he agrees with the comment on access and that to date Hennepin County hasn't officially weighed in. Platteter pointed out this is a transition area that needs a more sensitive approach. Concluding, Platteter said the project as submitted is too dense. Commissioner Olsen said she agrees with past comments. The project as proposed is too dense and amending the Comprehensive Plan shouldn't be treated lightly; it's too significant. Commissioner Schroeder said he acknowledges that change can happen; however, in the greater Southdale area it may be beneficial for the City to begin the process to study what "they" envision along France Avenue in the future. Schroeder said through a small area plan process or similar form of study density thresholds should be established and all details found during the study would need to be analyzed. Schroeder said at this time he cannot support the project as submitted; more study needs to be done to either confirm if the vision for this area as laid out in the Comprehensive Plan is correct and if not; change it. Page 11 of 13 Motion Commissioner Olsen moved to recommend denial of the preliminary rezoning and development plan and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan based on staff findings. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. Chair Staunton recommended that the City Council consider authorizing that a small area plan study be done in the OR area of the greater Southdale area. Olsen and Schroeder accepted that amendment. All voted aye; motion to deny carried 8 -0. Chair Staunton told the applicants he applauds them on their efforts to bring affordable housing to Edina; however, in this instance it may be of benefit to the City to develop a small area plan for the greater Southdale area before any more decisions are made on density. He pointed out if one looks at France Avenue from 62 "d Street until 78' Street the area encompasses a lot of property with redevelopment potential. Staunton said he is hesitant on making decisions on this area without further study. Staunton reiterated it may be time to consider a small area plan. for the greater Southdale area. Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Forrest said he has concerns that developers presume the Commission and Council would consider amending the Comprehensive Plan. Page 12 of 13 Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague November 12, 2014 VII.D. Community Development Director INFORIVIATIONMACKGROUND Project Description The applicant, 7200 LLC is requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. (See property location on pages Al -A5.) The proposal is to tear down the existing office building on the site, and. redevelop it with .a four and five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including twa'restaurants and retail /office space. ➢ A two - level, 500 stall underground parking ramp:. The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail s�ace would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72" Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A13 — A56 and in the attached development plan book.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 76.5 feet: ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.49. In addition, the following land use applications are requested: Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to.PUD, Planned.Unit Development; and Preliminary Development Plan. This "prelim_ inary" review is the first step of a two -step process of.City review. Should the 'Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Rezoning be approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Site Plan;Teview which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD District would be included -in:the second step. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council: (See the sketch plans on pages A57 —A61; and the minutes from those meetings on pages A62 —A67.) The applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council at Sketch Plan. Some of the most significant changes include: . ➢ Reduction in the number of units from 195 to 160. ➢ Reducing the building height from 6 stories to 5; and reduced the townhome height on the west side. from 4. to 3 stories. ➢ . Reducing floor area ratio from 1.88 to 1.49. Increased the podium height on France by 10 feet. ➢ Increased landscaping. ➢ Created a green boulevard on 72nd Street which serves to prevent left turn out movements'-from the site. This would eliminate some traffic in the in the low density residential area to the west. ➢ Increased the setback on the west boundary from. 60 feet to 75 feet. ➢ Reduced the commercial space.from 26;500 to 20,000 square feet. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Sunrise Senior Assisted Living; zoned PSR, Planned Senior Residential District and guided Office Residential. Easterly: Macy's Home Store; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. (See pages A3 A5.) Southerly: An Office Building; zoned Planned Office District and guided Office Residential. Westerly: Duplexes and single family homes; zoned R -1 & R -2, Single and Double Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 3.51 acres in size, contains a multi -story office building with a low drainage area on the west side of the property that is wooded. (See page A2.) 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Site Circulation OR — Office Residential. (See page A5.) POD -1, Planned Office District (See page A3.) Access to the commercial portion of the development would be from France Avenue only. A new curb cut to France would be required. France Avenue is a County roadway, therefore would require Hennepin County approval. This access would be right -in and right -out only and would lead to the underground parking area. (See page A22.) There is an existing turn in lane on France Avenue that would remain. This could be used as a drop off area, and valet parking. Hennepin County has provided a preliminary review of the plans, and has indicated that they would not approve the right -in and right -out access to the retail, and would like to eliminate the existing turn in lane on France Avenue. Should these access points not be allowed; the entire project may have to be re- configured. Access to the residential portion of the development would be from 72 "d Street. There would be full access in, and right out only. (See page A22.) Extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. A new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along France Avenue. As recommended in the Sketch Plan review, the sidewalk has been separated from the turn in lane along France Avenue. A new east/west sidewalk, separated from the street would be built along 72 "d Street. (See page A21.) There would also be an interior circular sidewalk in the court yard area inside the residential portion of the site. (See page A21.) Traffic & Parking Study Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic study. (See the attached study on pages A_73 —A94.) The study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways. There would not be a change to the current level of service on the roads. No improvements would be needed to the roadway, other than what is proposed on 72 "d Street. However, as mentioned above, Hennepin County has indicated that they would not allow the access on France Avenue as proposed. Any condition of approval would require County approval or a re- working of the development to provide other access points off 72 "d 3 Shadow Study The applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacts the height of the building might have on the surrounding area. (See pages A54 —A56.) As demonstrated, the biggest impact would only be for a few hours roughly from 9 am to noon in the winter months when shadows would be cast over the single family homes to the northwest. (See page A54.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 40 over story trees and a full complement of understory shrubs. The applicant is proposing 77 overstory trees, including existing and proposed. The trees would include a mixture of Oak, Maple, Hackberry, Spruce, Honeylocust Aspen, and Linden. (See pages A36 —A37, and the development plan book.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Final Landscaping would be more closely reviewed with the Final Site Plan. The west side of the property is a wooded area that would remain to provide a natural buffer area to the low- density residential area to the west. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading for both the retail and residential space would take place from the courtyard area, and would be located inside the building. (See page A22.) Trash would be collected within the buildings and would also pick up from within the courtyard area. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and has a few concerns. (See the engineer's memo on pages A68 -A72.) These issues should be addressed at the time of Final Plan review. Any approvals should be conditioned on the conditions outline in the director of engineering's memo dated November 3, 2014. Building /Building Material The building would be constructed of brick, limestone, stucco, composite panels, precast concrete, and glass; "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level on France Avenue. (See renderings on pages All 7—Al 9 and A23- A26.) A materials board would be presented at the Final Site Plan phase. 11 Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be POD -1, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. Should this project be approved by the City Council; staff would recommend a full signage plan be submitted as part of the Final Development Plan. Plans should specifically include location and size of monument signs and way finding signage. Specific signage regulations would be incorporated into the PUD Zoning District including way finding signage. Setback from Single Family Homes Within the underlying POD -1 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings five stories tall be required to be setback twice the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The five -story portion of the building would be setback 320 feet from the nearest R -1 property. (See page A2a.) Based on the height of the five -story portion of the building, the required setback is 153 feet. Comprehensive Guide Plan /Density To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are requested: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 76.5 feet. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.49. Density. The proposed density of 50 units per acre exceeds the density range for the City's Office Residential area in the Comprehensive Plan by 20 units per acre. (See recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Approved Density in the OR District on page A10.) The proposed 50 units per acre density is on the higher end of existing development, but generally consistent with recent development projects. Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental (Senior Housing) 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 6500 France (Senior Housing) 6500 France 179 76 York Plaza Condos 7200 -20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240 -60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300 -50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites (Senior) 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69`h & York Apartments 3121 69`h Street 114 30 Lennar 6725 York 240 52 71 France (Byerly's) 71 France 234 23 Beacon 66 France 39 43 . The applicant has attempted to address the density concern that was raised at the Sketch Plan review by reducing the number of units from 190 to 160. Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The proposed floor area ration is 1.49. Under the current zoning district regulations of the POD -1 District, the maximum FAR allowed is .5. The applicant has attempted to address the FAR concern raised at Sketch Plan by reducing the floor area ratio from 1.88 to 1.49. Based on the above information, the following is the suggested Comprehensive Plan Amendment language, as recommended by staff. The text highlighted in red would be added to the existing text. Staff would further suggest flexibility in regard to density for housing in the CAC District. Nonresidential and Mixed Use Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines OR Transitional areas along Upgrade existing streetscape 12 -30 residential dwelling** Office - Residential major thoroughfares or and building appearance, units /acre No current examples between higher - intensity improve pedestrian and Floor to Area Ratio -Per in City. Potential districts and residential transit environment. current Zoning Code: examples include districts. Many existing Encourage structured maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 ** Pentagon Park area highway- oriented parking and open space and other I -494 commercial areas are linkages where feasible; ** Residential density may corridor locations anticipated to transition to emphasize the enhancement be increased to 50 units per this more mixed -use of the pedestrian acre and 1.5 floor area ratio character. environment. with the provision of a Primary uses are offices, minimum of 20% of the attached or multifamily dwelling units being for housing. affordable housing as Secondary uses: Limited defined by the Metropolitan retail and service uses (not Council. including "big box" retail), limited industrial full n Using the above amended text as a basis for review of the subject project, a case could be made to support the proposed high density through the PUD Zoning process. Height. At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council expressed some concern in regard to six - stories on the site. Podium height was recommended to minimize the height. The applicant has attempted to address the issue by increasing the podium height on France by 10 feet; and reduced the height from six -to -five stories. (See comparison on page A27.) Should the Planning Commission and City Council choose to support the proposed height increase; staff would recommend the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan: VA enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Using the above amended text as a basis for review of the subject project, a case could be made to support the proposed high density through the PUD Zoning process. Height. At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council expressed some concern in regard to six - stories on the site. Podium height was recommended to minimize the height. The applicant has attempted to address the issue by increasing the podium height on France by 10 feet; and reduced the height from six -to -five stories. (See comparison on page A27.) Should the Planning Commission and City Council choose to support the proposed height increase; staff would recommend the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan: VA Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights a City of Edina Southeast Quadrant 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Fgure4.6B Data Source: URS ®p 0.5 Miles * Height may be increased to five stories if podium Height is utilized on France Avenue and adjacent to low-density residential uses: 8 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 36 -253 of the Edina City Code provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening, g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; 0 h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Office Residential - OR," which allows residential use and retail on a limited basis. Mixed uses are encouraged. The primary use would be residential; and the retail use would be secondary, and serve not only the new residential use, but residential uses and office uses in the area. The site would be very pedestrian friendly with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. A new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along France Avenue; a new east/west sidewalk, separated from the street would be built along 72nd Street, and interior sidewalks would be provided. (See page A21.) As recommended in the Comprehensive Plan, and by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the Sketch Plan review, podium height would be utilized on France Avenue and from the low- density residential area to the west to lessen impact to the single - family and two - family homes to the west. There would be three -story apartments on the west side; and the wooded area on the west side of the site would also be preserved to screen the use. (See page A20.) The applicant is also proposing sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See page A14.) The project would include high efficiency mechanical equipment, appliances and electrical fixtures. Roof mounted photovoltaic panels for electrical energy generation are proposed. The applicant is pledging an energy savings 20% over current energy code requirements. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, limestone, precast concrete, composite metal panel and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level on France. (See pages A24 —A26.) The most significant element of the plan, in regard to PUD requirements, is providing 20% of the units for affordable housing. That would be 32 units toward the city's goal of 212 units by the year 2020 as established with the Metropolitan Council. 10 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. The proposed uses, residential and limited retail are uses allowed in the Office Residential area, as described in the Comprehensive Plan. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Office Residential — OR," which encourages the mixing of uses. In this instance the uses are residential and limited retail. The proposed uses are therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Again, the proposal is for a mixture of land uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The proposed density is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan would have to be amendment for the proposed development to be built. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning 11 district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. Below is a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying POD -1 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Please note that a few City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. Compliance Table * Variance would be required under POD -1 Zoning (See page A21a.) 12 City Standard (POD -1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — France 77 feet 26 feet* Avenue 77 feet 27 feet* Front — 72nd Street 77 feet 5 feet* Side — South 34 & 46 feet 75 feet Rear — West Building Height Four stories and Five Stories & 48 feet 77 feet* Maximum Floor Area .5% 1.49 %* Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 440 total 506 spaces total 200 — retail/restaurant 201 retail 240 enclosed (residential) 305 enclosed residential Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance would be required under POD -1 Zoning (See page A21a.) 12 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues o :Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: - 1. As highlighted above, the proposal meets the.City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provide a development that includes 20% (32 units) of the residential units as affordable housing. This project would help the City toward meeting its goal of creating 212 additional affordable housing units by the year 2020. Given the.City of .Edina's high. cost of land, it has been difficult in achieving affordable housing. The increase in floor area ratio and density'is required to make the development work. b. Provide mixture of use within the building with residential.and retail. c. Create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. A new north /south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along France Avenue and a new east/west sidewalk, separated: from the street would be built along 72nd Street. (See page A21.) There would be additional sidewalks provided within the courtyard area that would connect residents to the retail uses on France. (See page A21.) d. Podium Height would be used on both France Avenue and the west side of the development toward the low - density residential area. e. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See page A14.) The proposal includes high efficiency mechanical equipment, appliances and fixtures, high performing fiberglass and storefront window that meet Energy Star requirements. The applicant proposes a 20% improvement over current energy code requirements. f. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 2. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. The proposed residential use with limited retail would fit this neighborhood. Mixed use is encouraged within the OR, Office Residential area. 13 3. The existing: roadways would support'the project. Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 4. Assuming the adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, tWproposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall.that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent. neighborhoods :along secondary streets or walkways. o A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. C. Encourage.infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, anal /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixedruse development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of. sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects:of design, construction, renovation and long -term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to treets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street: i. Provide affordable housing. J. Create podium height. r 14 • Are the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments reasonable to allow the proposed development? No. For the following reasons, staff believes the proposal development is too dense for this site: 1. The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site. Under the current POD -1 zoning classification; a floor area ratio of .5 is allowed. The proposed FAR is 1.49. When comparing the recent comprehensive plan amendment that was approved for the Lennar project at 6725 York Avenue; the amount of floor area ratio over and above the City Code and Comprehensive Plan requested here is far greater. For the Lennar project, the allowed FAR was 1.0 and the proposed FAR was 1.27. 2. The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed. 3. This area on the west side of France Avenue is seen as a transition area from the low density residential to the west and the higher intensity commercial area on the east side of France. (See page A5 and A10 of the Comprehensive Plan.) The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as a "transitional area along major thoroughfares or between higher - intensity districts and residential districts." (See page A10.) 4. The proposal may set a precedent for similar development requests at this density. There are several properties within this OR area that have buildings in similar condition, that may be ripe for redevelopment. (See page A5.) 5. The Planning Commission is about to begin a study of the impact on greater development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on development in this OR, Office Residential area. Allowing a development within this area prior to completion of an impact study, may be premature. 6. While the applicant has made positive improvements to reduce the size of the development proposed at the sketch plan; staff does not believe they have reduced the size of the development enough to provide a development that is more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. Preliminary indications from Hennepin County is that they would not allow access to France Avenue. 15 Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendments While the project does contain a number of components that are desired in the Comprehensive Plan, however, due to the size of the project, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments based on the following findings: The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site. 2. The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed 3. This area on the west side of France Avenue is seen as a transition area from the low density residential to the west and the higher intensity commercial area on the east side of France. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as a "transitional area along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts." The proposed development is more for square footage than what would normally be allowed in the POD -1 Zoning District. 4. The proposal may set a precedent for similar development requests at this density. There are several properties within this OR, Office Residential area that have buildings in similar condition that may be ripe for redevelopment. 5. The proposed development is pre- mature given the Planning Commission's plan to study of the impact on greater development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on the west side of France in this OR, Office Residential area. 6. While the applicant has made positive improvements to reduce the size of the development proposed at the sketch plan; staff does not believe they have reduced the size of the development enough to provide a development that is more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The availability of access to France Avenue is questionable. If the County does not allow access, the plans may need to be revised. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Because of the denial recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan amendments, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend the el City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District Denial is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed development would allow for a floor area ratio that would be nearly three times the floor area ratio currently allowed for this site. 2. The proposed density is nearly double allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. A maximum of 30 units per acre is allowed, and 50 are proposed 3. This area on the west side of France Avenue is seen as a transition area from the low density residential to the west and the higher intensity commercial area on the east side of France. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as a "transitional area along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts." The proposed development is more for square footage than what would normally be allowed in the POD -1 Zoning District. 4. The proposal may set a precedent for similar development requests at this density. There are several properties within this OR, Office Residential area that have buildings in similar condition that may be ripe for redevelopment. 5. The proposed development is pre- mature given the Planning Commission's plan to study of the impact on greater development density in the Southdale area, with an emphasis on the west side of France in this OR, Office Residential area. 6. While the applicant has made positive improvements to reduce the size of the development proposed at the sketch plan; staff does not believe they have reduced the size of the development enough to provide a development that is more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The availability of access to France Avenue is questionable. If the County does not allow access, the plans may need to be revised. Deadline for a city decision: February 1, 2015 17 l _ AYELL� DRWE I�.•, 7012 -7013 7012.a1 _ _ 7006 I 7016 `=' z� - - AIi00 i 7100 X7101 m 7017 701ci _,117019 i 7010 - MAVELLE DRIVE 7104 7105 -- - -- I 7102! 7101 100 1I4001 7108 x:7109' ;7101 L , - 7112 ;!!7113, 7104 =! - 104 4000 7110 `f -7168 w 71097108 ' =t 1 I 7156 71i7 -- _ r . 24 NAZELTON ROAD_ _ 1- 71122.7111 112md I ! 7120 --�}h 7]21 [� 1Il _ (7124 ;71257116W,711717116n! i 1211 71171 17 71 n2s . o 713271 7133 7124,W 71257124 en 7125 7124 71361 ,7137!7128 ¢ 71297128 7129.7128 TREET WEST U 72 17200; 7201 7200 0 7201' 7201 720q� 7205 - 7205 720 7?00 17208, ;7207; 3F 7207 7209 17212', :7211 x/216 7215 7250 220"A I 7300 ,:722r-- 47219 ,7300 � 7301 7320 I ;7304 7308'j I ;1 '7312 i r - - -- - - -! .7316 7333 7320 7340 L i ri7 i ' 7380 x; Parcel 31- 028 -24-14 -0001 A -T -B: Torrens ID: Owner Market - Name: Total: Parcel 7200 France Ave S Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 3.51 acres Sale Area: 152,751 sq It Code: 7001 7101 7171 7235 3821 7373 ?501 124 7000 3650 i 3655 1 3301 t, ' 7230 4 f 7298 24 u ;3 1, - .:24 le, Map Scale: l" = 400 ft. /jN Print Date: 6/19/2014 r j This aW is a compilation of data lrom various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or jmpied, bndudrng fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and corrrplelcrress of the Information shorn. COPYRIGHT 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 Ttiini. Green! I & D - • Lu, b 72351 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 6/19/2014 + This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation of warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or Lha accuracy and completeness of the information shmvn. COPYRIGHT Q IIENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 —A Tifnk Green! i� R71-i 7 Parcel 31-028-24-14-0001 A-T-B: Torrens ID: Owner 1 Market Name: Total: Parcel 7200 France Ave S Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 3.51 acres Sale Area: 152,751 sq ft Code: D - • Lu, b 72351 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 6/19/2014 + This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation of warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or Lha accuracy and completeness of the information shmvn. COPYRIGHT Q IIENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 —A Tifnk Green! KAZELTOW RaA1) s Ave S 5435 =�r a,• j. s 1 :r F- J CI i �11• UJ w. wy o_ i Map Scale: V= 200 ft. Print Date: 6119120U i qm Id zoN I NG Legend PRR1 flannel Residence Dial PRo-2 FMM POD -1 Planned Offic.Dist -0.2 RW Di.. E MODS VVa Planning Dept N—b.,,2012 FA r� 1�+• ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business: ay 2008 Comprehensive Plan) City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Date of Aerial Photoglapty. August 2006 Figure 4.4 Conceptual Land Use Framework: Potential Areas of Change Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design �� 4 -33 S, tc Future Land Use Plan with 00-111. City of Edina Building Heights 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.68 Data Source: URS e o 0.5 arses O RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS REGARDING RESIDENTIAL DENSITY FOR MIXED USE AREAS, BUILDING HEIGHT, FLOOR AREA RATIO AND LAND USE Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Metropolitan Council has requested that the City of Edina establish new residential density ranges within the City's Comprehensive Plan to better align with the description of the uses allowed within each District. Floor area ratio alone cannot be used to determine densities within mixed use areas as suggested in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. 1.02 Lennar Corporation is proposing to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes /Avenue, and build a six- story, 240 unit upscale apartment building with 11,000 square feet of retail on the first level. To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan were approved by the City Council: 1. Building Height - from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 70 feet. 2. Floor Area Ratio - to exceed 1.0 in some instances. 3. Re- guiding the Land Use Plan for the five single - family homes on Xerxes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. 1.03 On June 11, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The Edina Comprehensive Plan is a guide for development and redevelopment in the city that establishes density ranges for the purposes of managing growth. Density in mixed use and planned commercial districts are primarily regulated by Floor Area Ratio within the existing Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2.02 Residential density ranges within the City's mixed use areas including CAC, Community Activity Center; MXC, Mixed Use Center; OR, Office Residential; and NC, Neighborhood Commercial District are between 1 -2 and 2 -3 units per acre, which are not feasible for the intended mixed -use character or opportunity in these areas. The City's LDR, Low Density Residential District allows up to 5 units per acre, which is a higher density than the above mixed use districts. The RM, Regional Medical District does not have a residential density range and senior housing is a permitted use. 2.03 By establishing new residential density ranges for these areas, the city would create the feasibility for mixed use projects. Changes to these residential density ranges would be accommodating growth that had already been anticipated and planned for in the City's future population projections. 11 ko RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page .2 2.04. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes: the Southdale, area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and,coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France. The floor area ratio maximum in the CAC is 1.0. The. suggested density of 2-3 units per acre would result in less density than the. City's Low gg ty � p . Density Residential area; which allows up to 5 unitsper acre, would not encourage a mixture of land uses. A density range of:12 -75 units per acre in this area is reasonable _given the description of this area is the city's most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Floor area ratio. would continue to impact densities based on the Zoning Ordinance regulations. 2.05. The OR, Office Residential District guides density at a range of 2 -3 units per acre in the current Comprehensive Plan. An OR density of 12 -30 units per acre would be consistent with High Density Residential District and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. 2.06. The MXC, Mixed Use Center district guides density at a range of 1 -2 units per acre. These areas include 50th .& France, Grandview and Centennial Lakes/ Greater Southdale area. A Mixed Use Center density of 12 -30 units would be consistent with High Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. This density range is consistent with existing, densities in all three of these areas, including 50th and France Condos (23 units per acre): and 71 France in the Centennial: Lakes are_ a (24 units per acre), and Grandview Square (29 units per acre.) 2.07 The NC, Neighborhood Commercial District guides density at a range of 1 -2 units per acre. A density of 5 -12 units would be consistent with Medium Density Residential district and reasonable to encourage mixed use development. 2.08 The RM, Regional Medical District is an area that is proposed for senior housing, and does not have a specific range for density. A Comprehensive Plan amendment was approved for the senior housing project at 6500 France. Senior Housing creates a lesser impact on traffic; therefore, higher densities can be supported in this area. Density for senior housing shall also be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include. Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. A density range of 12 -80 units per acre is reasonable to encourage that use in the district. . 2.09. Establishing higher residential density ranges within mixed use areas, align with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including growth that had been forecasted by the Metropolitan Council. 2.10. The proposed densities using unit per acre are consistent with the existing descriptions of each land use category in the Comprehensive Plan; are consistent with existing development in Edina; and are consistent with the existing Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2.11. There is adequate roadway capacity and sewer capacity to support the proposed residential density ranges proposed in these mixed use areas. Existing language xxxx Language recommended x x Language stricken x RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -68 Page 3 2.12. The proposed land use change of the single family homes on Xerxes Avenue are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The City of Richfield has guided the single family homes on the east side of Xerxes as medium density residential, and the property to the north west and south in Edina are guided CAC, Community Activity Center; therefore, the long term vision of both Edina and Richfield in this area is for higher densities. 2.13. Podium height is proposed on both Xerxes and York as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. The six story portion of the building is stepped back into the site to minimize impact on adjacent property. 2.14. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use at 1.27, which is predominantly residential, is appropriate for the area. 2.15. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 3.01 Resolution 2014 -51 is rescinded. 3.02 The following Comprehensive Plan Amendments are approved subject to review by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §473.864: A. Future Land Use Categories. The categories in the table below apply to the Future Land Use Plan. It is important to note that land use categories are not zoning districts - they are broader and more long -term in scope. The land use plan and the zoning ordinance should be consistent with one another, but are not identical. Each land use category may be implemented through more than one zoning district, allowing for important differences in building height, bulk and coverage in different areas of the city. Some revisions to existing zoning districts or creation of new districts may ultimately be needed as part of the implementation of the land use plan. Land uses are characterized primarily by range of densities or intensities. For residential uses, density is defined in terms of dwelling units per net acre (exclusive of road rights -of- way and public lands). For nonresidential and mixed uses, intensity is typically defined in terms of floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, which refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. A density unit per acre range is listed below, however, in practice FAR limits the density in the Edina Zoning Ordinance based on site size. Thus, a maximum FAR of 1.0 could allow for a two -story building covering 50% of the lot; a 3 -story building on one -third of the lot, and so on. Building heights are not specified in the table, because height will vary within and between categories, based on neighborhood context, infrastructure, and community design goals. (See the discussion later in this section.) Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken 3eaaE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 4 The "Development Guidelines' in the table below are intended to highlight important design considerations for each land use category, but are not regulatory in nature. When residential development is proposed in a mixed use district, the residential density range shall apply, in addition to the FAR requirement. Residential development is not required in mixed use areas. Residential Description, Land Uses Development Density Range Categories Guidelines LDR Applies to largely single- family Massing standards Low Density residential neighborhoods, (under development) 1- 5 units /acre Residential encompassing a variety of lot and impervious Floor to Area Ratio: per sizes and street patterns (see coverage limitations current Zoning Code* "Character Districts" for more would apply to ensure detail). Typically includes small compatibility of infill institutional uses such as schools, construction. churches, neighborhood parks, etc. LDA Applies to two- family and Introduction of more Low - Density attached dwellings of low contemporary housing 4 - 8 units /acre Attached Residential densities and moderate heights. types, such as low- Floor to Area Ratio: per This category recognizes the density townhouses, current Zoning Code* historical role of these housing may be an appropriate types as transitional districts replacement for two - between single - family residential family dwellings in areas and major thoroughfares or some locations, commercial districts. May provided that include single- family detached adequate transitions to dwellings. and buffering of adjacent dwellings can be achieved. MDR Applies to attached housing In new development Medium - Density (townhouses, quads, etc.) and or redevelopment, 5 -12 units /acre Residential multi- family complexes of improve integration of Floor to Area Ratio: per moderate density. multi- family housing current Zoning Code* May also include small into an interconnected institutional uses, parks and open street network and space work to create an attractive, pedestrian- friendly street edge. HDR Existing "high- rise" and other Provide incentives for 12 - 30 units /acre Density High - Density concentrated multi- family updating older for senior housing may be Residential residential, some of which may multifamily buildings. increased to over 30 units contain a mixed use component. Mork to create an per acre, based on May also include limited office, attractive, pedestrian - Proximity to hospitals, service or institutional uses friendly street edge proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, primarily to serve residents' and provide level of transit service needs, parks and open space convenient access to available, and impact on transit, schools, parks, adjacent roads. Other and other community desired items to allow Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken x�peE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 5 Existing language xxxx AD Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxxi ,N� destinations. greater density for senior housing would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. Floor to Area Ratio: per current Zoning Code* Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines Mixed Use Guidelines Categories NC Small- to moderate -scale Building footprints 23 5 -12 residential Neighborhood commercial, serving primarily the generally less than dwelling units/ acre Commercial adjacent neighborhood(s). 20,000 sq. ft. (or less Floor to Area Ratio -Per Current examples: Generally a'node' rather than a for individual current Zoning Code: • Morningside 'corridor.' Primary uses are retail storefronts). Parking is maximum of 1.0* commercial core and services, offices, studios, less prominent than institutional uses. Residential pedestrian features. • Valley View and permitted. uses p Encourage structured Wooddale Existing and potential parking and open • 70th & Cahill neighborhood commercial space linkages where districts are identified for further feasible; emphasize study. enhancement of the pedestrian environment. OR Transitional areas along major Upgrade existing 2-- 312 -30 residential Office - Residential thoroughfares or between higher- streetscape and dwelling units/ acre No current examples intensity districts and residential building appearance, Floor to Area Ratio -Per in City. Potential districts. Many existing highway - improve pedestrian current Zoning Code: examples include oriented commercial areas are and transit maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* Pentagon Park area anticipated to transition to this environment. and other I -494 more mixed -use character. Encourage structured corridor locations Primary uses are offices, attached parking and open or multifamily housing. space linkages where Secondary uses: Limited retail feasible; emphasize and service uses (not including the enhancement of "big box" retail), limited the pedestrian industrial (fully enclosed), environment. institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. O This designation allows for Provide Floor to Area Ratio - Per Office professional and business offices, buffer/ transition to Zoning Code: Current examples generally where retail services do adjacent residential Maximum of 0.5 include the office not occur within the development uses. Use high quality Existing language xxxx AD Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xxxi ,N� RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 6 buildings on the west unless they are accessory uses permanent building side of TH 100 that serve the needs of office materials and on -site between 70t" and 77th building tenants. Vehicle access landscaping. Streets. requirements for office uses are Encourage structured high; however, traffic generation parking. from office buildings is limited to morning and evening peak hours during weekdays. Office uses should be located generally along arterial and collector streets. Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines Mixed Use Guidelines Categories MXC Established or emerging mixed Maintain existing, or 12 -30 residential Mixed -Use Center use districts serving areas larger create new, pedestrian dwelling units/ acre Current examples: than one neighborhood (and and streetscape Floor to Area Ratio -Per • 50f and France beyond city boundaries). amenities; encourage current Zoning Code: • Grandview Primary uses: Retail, office, or require structured maximum of 1.5 service, multifamily residential, parking. Buildings institutional uses, parks and open "step down" in height space. from intersections. Vertical mixed use should be 4 stories at 5011, & encouraged, and may be required France; 3 -6 stories at on larger sites. Grandview CAC The most intense district in terms Form -based design 2-- -312 -75 residential Community Activity of uses, height and coverage. standards for building dwelling units/ acre Center Primary uses: Retail, office, placement, massing Floor to Area Ratio -Per Example: Greater lodging, entertainment and and street -level current Zoning Code: Southdale area (not residential uses, combined or in treatment. maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* including large multi- separate buildings. Buildings should be Floor to Area Ratio may family residential Secondary uses: Institutional, placed in appropriate exceed 1.0 on a case by neighborhoods such recreational uses. proximity to streets to case basis, subject to. as Centennial Lakes ) Mixed use should be encouraged, create pedestrian "step proximity to utilities and may be required on larger scale. Buildings capacity, level of transit sites. down" at boundaries service available, and with lower - density impact on adjacent roads. districts and upper Other desired items to stories "step back" allow greater density or from street. density on the high end of More stringent design the residential housing standards for range above, would buildings > 5 stories. include: Below grade Emphasize pedestrian Parking, provision of circulation; re- park or open space, introduce finer - affordable housing, grained circulation sustainable design patterns where principles, provision of feasible. public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. Existing language xxxxI Language recommended xxxx Language stricken x RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 Page 7 Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xx3e I Applies to existing Performance Floor to Area Ratio: Per Industrial predominantly industrial areas standards to ensure Zoning Code: 0.5* within the City. Primary uses: compatibility with industrial, manufacturing. adjacent uses; Secondary uses: limited retail screening of outdoor and service uses. activities. Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Guidelines Mixed Use Guidelines Categories RM Hospitals, senior housing *, Form -based design 12 -80 senior residential Regional Medical medical and dental offices and standards for building dwelling units/ acre clinics, and laboratories for placement, massing Floor to Area Ratio - Per performing medical or dental and street -level current Zoning Code: research, diagnostic testing, treatment. maximum of 1.0 For analytical or clinical work, having Pedestrian circulation medical office uses. a direct relationship to the and open space providing of health services. amenities should be Density for senior General office uses are permitted. provided for larger housing shall be based on sites. proximity to hospitals, Senior housing may include: proximity to low density independent living, assisted living, uses, utilities capacity, memory care, and skilled nursing. level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. OSP Applies to major parks and Performance and N/A Open Space and protected open space that is buffering standards Parks publicly owned. May not include for intensive outdoor all small parks, since some are recreation, parking. included in residential land use districts. PSP Applies to schools, large Performance and To be determined - may Public/Semi- Public institutional uses (churches, buffering standards require review of large - cemeteries) and semi -public uses for intensive outdoor scale development or such as country clubs. Some recreation, parking. institutional expansion small uses of these types may be integrated into other land use districts. Existing language xxxx Language recommended xxxx Language stricken xx3e Mpu CAP 333 Washington Avenue North, Suite 210, Union Plaza, Minneapolis, MN 55401 T. 612.676,2700 F: 612,676.2796 www.djr- ine.com October 10, 2014 Cary Teague, Planning Director Planning Department Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Project: Element - Mixed -Use Redevelopment Location: 7200 France Avenue South Subject: Project Narrative Proposed Redevelopment: The proposed project is a new 5 story mixed use project redevelopment of the site at 7200 France Avenue South. The proposal is to replace the existing office building and construct a mixed -use development of approximately 207,000 SF with site improvements. The proposed project includes approximately 160 residential units, 20,000 SF of restaurant/retail /office space and approximately 500 parking spaces in two levels of underground parking. Summary of Modifications from Sketch Plan Review: • Reduced building height from 6 stories to 5 stories and reduced townhomes on the west side from 4 stories to 3 stories. • Reduced Unit count from 195 units to 160 units • Increased the podium setback on France Avenue by 10 feet • Increased landscaping and setback along France Avenue and introduced green boulevard on 72 "d Street, • Increased setback on western boundary from 60 feet to 75 feet. • Reduced FAR from 1.88 to 1.49. • Reduced Commercial space from 26,500 to 20,000 SF City and Neighborhood Betterment: The proposed redevelopment of this parcel from office to residential and retail uses will benefit the city and area surrounding the project in the following ways: • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial services and office sectors (80 %/20% split of market rate to affordable housing) • Provide convenient retail /commercial uses for the area. • Locates both residential and commercial parking within the building creating a better visual environment unlike the vast majority of commercial projects along France Avenue. • Improve the site with more vibrant uses and an attractive building • Create a greener and more environmentally friendly development improving storm water rates through retained green space, green roofs and rain gardens. • Alternative energy options including photovo,ltaics are being pursued to lower the projects carbon footprint. • Sustainable design strategies will be incorporated into the project such as efficient lighting, mechanical systems, and rainwater harvesting for irrigation. A�3 7200 France Avenue South — Preliminary Development Narrative • Detailed and landscaped plaza courtyard beautifies the 72nd Street. • Provides small scale neighborhood serving retail and office uses • Adds new businesses to the Edina. Sustainability Sustainability is a key component of the project, both in the importance of being a good steward of the environment as well as being a good neighbor. The key sustainable strategies of the project can be categorized in the following design elements: Storm water: The current site has an impervious coverage of 56% without any comprehensive storm water strategies except the catchment basin on the west side and a couple of inlets on the south side which do not provide any rate or quality control for storm water. The proposed project incorporates the following improvements to the existing condition. 1) The project preserves the 60 foot buffer of native vegetation on the west side of the site including an existing storm water catchment area and lift station which will naturally enable storm water collection and filtration. 2) The heavily landscaped courtyard area over the parking decks will hold and clean the majority of rainfall in that area much like the natural buffer to the west. Soil depths of 12 -30 inches of soil allow the absorption and holding of run -off in this area irrigating the native selections of vegetation and keeping the rainwater out of the storm system. 3) South side of the parking structure is also covered with green roofing providing retention and the potential for resident gardens. 4) New storm water infiltration tanks will be located on the west side of the building capturing excess storm water not used for irrigation or captured by the landscaped areas of the courtyard. 5) The proposed site reduces impervious surface to 48% of the site; an improvement of 11,000 SF. Energy Efficiency & Generation: 1) High efficiency mechanical equipment 2) High efficiency appliances and electrical fixtures 3) Roof mounted photovoltaic panels for electrical energy generation 4) High performing fiberglass and storefront windows that meet Energy Star requirements 5) Improved insulation & advanced detail techniques equating to a 20% improvement over current energy code requirements Water Efficiency: 1) Rainwater for irrigation 2) Drip irrigation w /drought tolerant planting to additionally reduce watering 3) Low flow plumbing fixtures and appliances — this decreases water use and waste water PUD / Zoning: The project proposes to change the zoning of the site from POD -1 to a PUD using the MDD -6 as a basis for the zoning entitlements. The application for a PUD is based largely around a desire to develop a more pedestrian friendly development, a mixture of uses and a greater density for the site. The proposed building will enclose the majority of parking below grade and maintain a 75' -0" setback and existing vegetative buffer from the residential neighborhood to the west. In addition, the site is designed to keep the higher height and density toward France Avenue with the lowest height toward the residential neighborhood. The effective site size is 3.18 acres (138,650 SF). The proposed development not including garage space is 206,900 GSF for a proposed FAR of 1.49. The overall density of the site is largely mitigated by the stepping down of the height from France Avenue to the west toward the single family housing. The landscaped courtyard in the center off of 72nd street also scales the building to the neighborhood and provides a welcoming entry to residential visitors and the neighborhood. 2 Alk 7200 France.Avenue South — Preliminary Development Narrative Comprehensive Plan / Greater S` �outhdale Area Land Use and Parking Final Report The current comprehensive plan has recommended office and high" density residential uses for this site area and neighborhood from 69. th street south to Parklawn (Edge:West District) in. the Greater Southdale Area Land Use report. In addition`, the site is within the Southdale area of mixed -use region around the mall in the character defining areas the Comprehensive Plan and a "Potential Area of Change ". The proposed project is in keeping with that mixture of uses as its scale transitions from the higher density toward France Avenue while tapering down toward the residential neighborhood behind. The distribution of uses follows this form by keeping the commercial uses and traffic on France Avenue as well. Traffic: Housing at this location will be able to take full advantage of the recent pedestrian and bike improvements completed by the city. The range of goods and services within an easy'/ Mle radius of the site offers a built in amenity to residents. Their proximity also lessens the demands for vehicle trips decreasing the car traffic to and from the site: The project's site improvements along France Avenue offer an amenity for pedestrians and bicyclists by ' creating a protected walkway away from France Avenue vehicular traffic and lined with landscaping and other pedestrian improvements. The introduction of a sidewalk on the south side of 72nd street also reinforces this pedestrian connection, coupled with the new median at 72 "d street will create a completely different pedestrian: environment in the immediate.area. Residential and commercial vehicular traffic at the site is split between two entries to the underground garages. Commercial traffic will enter via a right in / right out access to the upper garage level. Residential resident and guest parking will enter from 72 "d street to the courtyard garage entry. On grade convenience parking for guests and move -ins are located in the courtyard. This approach greatly reduces traffic in the South Cornelia Neighborhood to the west and keeps all commercial traffic at France Avenue. Affordable. Housing: As part of a commitment to provide affordable housing to all people in the community, the project is proposing 32 units for residents who meet certain income thresholds. This type of housing is targeted to working adults or small families who earn less than the median income of the community. They provide an opportunity for young people starting their careers, teachers and service workers a chance to stay in the community they work. The site is uniquely situated where residents can easily access the commercial shops and services of the Southdale area without requiring the use of a car. Landscape The proposed landscape at Element will be clean and contemporary, with over -story boulevard trees on the north and east sides along 72nd Street and, France Avenue, with upright planters near building entrances with seasonal annuals for color. The parking area will contain a mixture of over story and under -story trees with a full accompaniment of shrubs and perennial plants. The proposed planting palette is comprised of native and adapted plant materials, which will use less water and require less maintenance overtime. To the west, the existing storm pond and existing wooded area will be left as -is, providing a natural buffer and giving residents both a sense of scale and allowing for a natural privacy screen along the entire,west facade. The southern facade will feature a terraced green roof, with limited access and the opportunity for community farming in raised planters, irrigated utilizing site - harvested rain water. 3 � �� 4 7200 France Avenue South — Preliminary Development Narrative We believe the redevelopment of this site would be an improvement for the city and one that will enhance not only the character of the area, but also the city itself. Sincerely, Sheldon Berg, AIA Principal Cc: Adam Seraphine, NHH Properties Lori Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation P: \djr- arch\2014 \114 - 0015.0 - Boisclair - 72nd & France Mixed Use \Word \Design\Zoning & Planning \Preliminary Applications and docs \7200 France Ave - Narrative.doc 4 Ali 'BOIL R� NHH PROPERTIES `µ "c" WA DESIGN .BUILD .MANAGE DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. � � NHH PROPERTIES , • DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 0 R ' • SITE SPECIFICATIONS AREA 138,650 SF ACRES 3.18 BUILDING SIZE 206,952 SF F.A.R. 1.49 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE = 50 =bft F—j C=h Ltd z NHH PROPERTIES DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJ R ' � ARCHITECTURE IN- RAMP TO PARKING RESIDENTIAL ROW HOUSE STYLE m ONG RESIDENTIAL GARDEN AREA 4 ,I f i i 72ND STREET E i Lu U it W � �1 uz ` ii j -�f Ili VALET 4 RAMP TO PARKING qII! NHH PROPERTIES � DJR • � � � DESIGN : BUILD : MANAGE 'S` "" K ARCHITECTURE INC. C • ' P 0 R A T 1 • 1 H M I � —7S P !i 36 1 I .I L----- - - - - -{ 1 � 1 A I � L A 11114 - __--- -__ -__ -72ND STREET MPROVEMENTS PROPOSED BUILDING 056 - - -�► LFE 2 03 GREEN ROOF -- - -_ -_ _ - - - -- RE _ S' O' oinl'utk fancu�. s. .. - e 4� r R rr� m u,I. la<Rlmn EXISTING BUILDING 540 .0 SET BAC SITE PLAN V- o� 1 I 1 1 1 1 PBBREVI�TIOH lR 2 f.er Ow R. ca".r. wssnc :w Z t PROVOS n Pl. R[Ww0 Wlu.ms suiwl,ux (MPRm'j MIWmOUf �AVCIRIII I�wtu[�1 /5•[wY. FASO to, i #A t 1'1 1 1 t PROPOSED t 1 ' t 7 B56 . 0111115 + 1� j •� 1 PROPOSED BUILDING 056 - - -�► LFE 2 03 GREEN ROOF -- - -_ -_ _ - - - -- RE _ S' O' oinl'utk fancu�. s. .. - e 4� r R rr� m u,I. la<Rlmn EXISTING BUILDING 540 .0 SET BAC SITE PLAN V- o� 1 I 1 1 1 1 PBBREVI�TIOH lR 2 f.er Ow R. ca".r. wssnc :w Z t PROVOS n Pl. R[Ww0 Wlu.ms suiwl,ux (MPRm'j MIWmOUf �AVCIRIII I�wtu[�1 /5•[wY. FASO to, i #A t 72ND STREET - �i��..______.�.... _. �-- •-- ., -..._ � =1 - V-0 RAMP TO PARKING RESIDENTIAL ROW HOUSE STYLE -j ` /' RESIDENTIAL GARDEN AREA I i NHH PROPERTIES DESIGN : BUILD : MANAGE DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. r VALET RAMP TO PARKING LOCAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL NHH PROPERTIES � DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJR ARCHITECTURE IN( I YI 4L NHH PROPERTIES DESIGN :BUILD :MANAGE DJRw, ARCHITECTURE INC. - - -OR PORA'l ION z. �j NHH PROPERTIES I BUILD : MANAGE DJR • • • DESIGN . B ARCHITECTURE INC. sA NHH PROPERTIES DESIGN : BUILD : MANAGE DJR • • • ARCHITECTURE INC- F-11 7200 France Avenue France Avenue Byerly's r— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6 stories 5 stories Office 7200 France Avenue W 72nd Street Housing Nfifl PROPERTIES DESIGN : BUILD : MANAGE DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. ' • ALTA /AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY 'for -' #7200 France LLC & Anchor Bank, N.A. & Commercial Partners Title, LLC, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company & NHH Companies L.L.C. PROPERTY ADDRESS: #7200 FRANCE AVE. SO., EDINA, MN 55435 GENERAL NOTES P.I.D. #31 - 028 -24 -14 -0001 =Z .r o.. r•� rr.l.x.11« .w« :� ins, .s. ��x a...r:.lb..I .,r< ° °;,f"a:'..a � i I I I I 1 BENCHMARK Hcnvn al.: ao��. >w... :. ,,. .e..•..u. ..u.•« .I , «.,l »,..1 . ,a «r •ro . •x.. ..- �„Oy � r�.rw. " I � GRAPHIC SCALE [gym imuima Tevu r w xL Ds A 'RE ..—B- OI T-1 nT 1. ' I I I I , Ilrkln Do I n ________________ ____ ____ I -Ml+.r .lE.• r• .mow •r wr : !' , NFr5133'w �'• tr' NORTH ■ Z,aN —11 -- STREET WEST. a m r�olROA r •.rrr x ...w, x .-.• .« C` 7 I •J'•Y��.. ,.,._m., ,�., ..4:'k` �,. �., .. I LEGEND pp ,y mw,l, ., i, __________________ � ______r_ _____________rwF - rb' RX.F.Y T;EnsERw, Ru •DC. x0 I rS -� ______.sY *,s .5A ' _ J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ___ -_ _ LN.________ ____ -- • DENOTES EIOx uONWENi FODUO b DENOTES STEN S SEWER N.uNCl DENOTES CIICH BASIN u,.xNOLE E 1�1.: I ,°� '•"s ..kq.a, si I ❑ DENOTES ,L .Slx I I`I .w• .. w it tl•• I DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT • w. .+✓ 8;' I — »-- ENDrzS ZTDxu ZEwCx r I .. " � D -- i tr¢•^7" .. w• ,,. w,; ,,,,' • ".' • �, ",, /, i .. � - i 0 DEND,EZ CONCRETE I•< 4 3F I I DExD,ES el,D�.N- 4 • ' '� lA __ I Y DENOTES UTAITY BOX ` •„( Jj'1 ••'" "" t w R DENOTES EXISTING FENCE ""• - A� —•— DENOTES EXISTING FENCE ..... ... t ' I ! l- W r .w .w• E I W' � 4 1 I � y4 .+• i I i..rl• ry IN • I_ _ a� �_ _�q. i .... ... r I) I I ry'�rir.l: w w< Fro yl i I . I I I ! lI -mow ___— \_____ •« •w PAM�[.L1M2•b: • '' 1... NEf n .p, 1, ii � I {. I I I LiiT ZONING & SETBACK WFORMATION „ D•AI -ED Dlsxa: ul5,.la1 NIeIN"I—.w,— .I, --"•,G . I I I I NO, AT ACRE LAND SURVEYING . •„ �arase -�i s ENS— BLNL N XG .1 r•'• a� I r I J 3 TLF I w • w '_• ,y •< S I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION —21-1 la„ Iwrt, .mn . w ox, , rTD.,.,...b.g. - I,.. o w w' "<' _ •�rN.. •` r3° - -- u- Q ,er...r...�lll- r.- .,eo,,, w• F.w -- -- _;`_. - �`l '�— 2 _ it ..,.,- .r. ».x,., -,Y:. l..:...•r..r.,,.... , =a.. �. "` �.,rw,a.,k,. W.w -.., rx,,..,l,.r .'n� EPS1w0 BVlpNO � ( e ' vml r. �«• lo„xl ,....Nx,.,fi,T,.,. w• w w �' ` I+�•' I , � � r f !..' i l.. I N.kx.,,, ,. ,,.• •�,�I.auro• <'k")".< r.+ 11.1• •w+E �• 1--- 49 1'.l •B H''+-�•'� E•�irC.Ei,wy3_•; 4 I ..w. •EIOSDNDB UNN,• uuxr.rru rur¢.I.o Wf`I I I I I I I Ikr<YYa°E %,• E]]DD Rwk. ED: E A,kn.r.•.x.IIA. Lomm.,cw. -1n.N DIY, LTC, DIE E..uR. N°Ibml DRe D•.I.— wrvwlraxaD. Rw.. w. EECku°. rb...Q,..r..a.ED.a , Nr - r.""A.,,k.°;x.N b,,..drbx Am x.m.r uw E- •N...wwx,...,.rr.. �biYiwY�d w. rbkmN ,.- .iNM'- wcSYWNpE.,IRryu,m -r. fiv ALFUARMIeIiuk CUnryi «,rkry a.Alr.li<u S•Wlw.b}I°Ib A1TA.,J AEBM,.�I m.rtmnO. EVr r.Em°.eEEUI. -A •° 116+1. H.aluq.x bbaElbry ramNN exrrc°.r. e4rR.M.1 rbwaea I Y,. rdkE W.rr Ib Cemmrinm krTUk IPYT'C i�e•rl br L°mm-kW Ealmn Nk. LLG,.bI°I Ir,M ITW.3EI, D.M Y W 1j4lk --al REV. 01/10/11. ENGINEER E—ENTS REV. lh I45 1., ADDITIONAL UTILITY ONTO. rN A,ulu JOB #14081 lurvll r nlnr Row E • I_ _ a� �_ _�q. i City M w.., NIIDDesnm (ND SD.]E) F- - �m 7200 France Avenue South, Edina, MN 55435 Parking On Site Level Stalls Per Level LEVEL P2 267 LEVEL P1 227 LEVEL 12 20 APARTMENTS 2 PER UNIT 506 PARKING SUMMARY Floor Area Ratio Level USE PARKING REQUIREMENT TOTAL REQUIRED TOTAL PROVIDED 140 APARTM ENTS 1,75 PER UNIT 245 265 20 APARTMENTS 2 PER UNIT 40 40 12,500 SF RETAIL 8/1,000 SF 100 100 7,500 SF REST. 1 PER 3 SEATS + LEVEL 5 28,856 SF 1 PER EMPLOYEE 84 101 TOTAL 469 506 Floor Area Ratio Floor Area Ratio Level FAR Area Level FAR Area LEVEL P1 4,926 SF LEVEL 3 30,042 SF LEVEL 1 45,839 SF LEVEL 4 30,042 SF LEVEL 1.5 18,585 SF LEVEL 5 28,856 SF LEVEL 2 47,664 SF ROOF / LEVEL 5.5 1,106 SF zUi,U59 zsI- BUILDING SUMMARY SITE AREA: 138,650 SF BUILDING AREA: 207,059 SF FAR: 1.49 GROSS RENTABLE AREA: 162,670 NET RENTABLE ESTIMATE: 152,910 UNITS: 160 UNITS PER ACRE = 50 Z�SS 1, g9F,s G000 ALTA /AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY for- #7200 France LLC & Anchor Bank, N.A. & Commercial Partners Title, LLC, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company & NHH Companies L.L.C. PROPERTY ADDRESS: #7200 FRANCE AVE. SO., EDINA, MN 55435 GENERAL NOTES P.I-D. #31- 028 -24 -14 -0001 I I X. BENCHMARK _ cm..I c„n., ii � a. cm; nnan..na c.... ,� la �I r. -Rom ;« .,,uk.lim .; °Inlr e!•ae �° ° � I GRAPHIC SCALE Ii ANE�BARn.�aC rnA wa�nn�m+smvn5rmwolu4 _ � °n em..n «, x .. we «.ml..we.rc..r . « «I u,..I > .u..n •.,. , .Ilnn . '•Yr ° In. max. °.Bons. Kn�.. ml° c,. ,I.ns ;n oLS.O; Pwass ,.,< c«z eALL RO�zT I.,e,oee,. OT. �eRRES PEn �,. d 1ANS D L:n - - - - - -J ,d'•L --- T ---------------------------- I - -- -- - --------------------- - - - -T- "... I t o as 2 r =~' -eM w -e . .•IMe -serer rlx. IN.x .. .� x;..l,.•�� z..,l., zl, n „ .ne. E.I� Ilt .. LEGEND y. S• w aln • xzln « .�,Ae re, r If 72IQ ST T We5T_,. .�,� :. NORTH ------------- IV p ..... I� _ - `I I .. •C.' — I rnsnNC rmaDINC at r l .J• I I � ,i;. � .v " �' .eer e..l,i„ ...,. wy,• w�cyp�e- W �w \ �I , { '" ~• _ • _ _ ------ BUILDING____ • g � Y I -. ... i Uri l y2• ua• ' Li y ` " nr �'� �• et • \\ X: --ply RAp L�2 : . r wr.,...- . A'Y M •L � pARCEL,*3'�'/ •'+ a ,. •• E• •• i Ir - e•ne Y'° ° EASTWG BUILDING emnr wn r,lan: px are>AD Ci ZONING & SETBACK INFORMATION °. t•wnEe tlrp OU,.CeI I � AeovF lnrwnAnon°E.YMV,EA4trt Aicm R.vmmc Re.Mrw[xr t9STrlf- e,wlerryn /,.. WoJSJ ACS—.1 2tl _ m«r ncxacU ux.;v�u,1 n•.e �:liee yol;n; C°n.n�lmon rm r�uc I�;,,. -u;n ;,u�ce el C°��m.ncal rM.a, tol., Ile. 1-1 /;;;;. 1711'.1- Rt a no. l61 rV TI;vO xyx+e °en W AEV. ,O /0) /IA. CNWNEEfl CDNAEN rS 9el' Yan I0l� I 1 o..e,.I 1,11. s1.1, . O>ne/ •. . IN - ACRE LAND SURVEYING -T * ew1T-o 70.1 - 459 -2YG7 eaalentlswi r R,vmly.... r.LS/ul`3 . ......... .• .. �. ,. .. .. .. ev.er;x r.a}eu noevwnc..er..°c. Aw n.e a...°.ya.ao-"a..y nngow znu e,l 9 t��lnt �tCJ �I QI W, I I I I I 1 I I I I I 5 I � I 1 I b Z JOB #14081 ® DENOTES S.w11ARV 5[xFP uAnnOLE ® .1 0- STORU SE— A.—I ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN :z DENOrts nRE N DENOTES ST.. SEVER W BENOICS CO .1. I CEN 9TMx,0 5 pEn.— RS GAS uEIFRAOx DENOTES UTILITY BOX —•— —STES unDERCflWNDETElEPNONEMKII OPM •— DENOTES unDERGROUND CAS —.— OEnO,ES unDww0uN0 FL[<TR C OENOOTES `AIERNAM —>— SAN LARY SENEA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION m""r z .e.�r°"'R."...°�k�bll °..•'m.,:I ne0,...me.nc" .1n+.I,. m. nl acn. Am.R,.I;..an�..ee„ city or Mama, MII—M. Inc xW) Br � I rrerz.xl N. :•'w:. t . E i kit N � � T 4y.L[N••� ,r city or Mama, MII—M. Inc xW) m —ju i I N N89 °51'35°W .EW pw awlY I�t s¢Iipn m°pp"q un- lu].ps 520.01 es].xp NwIN Ilneal SEl /{ pl NE1 /4 °I Sectlm Jl, 1pxnNq xB, Ronpa 2 - - - - --- —_ STREET WEST 1 \ I'a� z \rs q.. err u< 10' 00 W, as w�sszu SCALE 1' - 20' - Op.. -" I D " - ]m r> W • alp � � F. ory u.n.i TD m m DUSTING BUILDING — � D I W p� p1ANx{N p M I .O vws rmml rm wmn o M mommoeu. .. Y�po 'at.] npvl , p �.onv.� m LL I °E9 MJ()J I BULDING I ° S p�ac tusYmm+..rvmnwm 5x0.0 �•'i en? � � � I � �[ [ muwl c Iwwwe m ' w I u= - ❑ m .nw.. cwim II m OlM1ni pM a'] -]fn ED eQe �ca L m.nvwo.e l.meam 1 wuYn. Imc 89° 1'3 "g .: ,, ° e •Ir mba.c a n... e<� . a31an -lupax 3 — ° Nns Inallf�v s Eor .. x,lso lwsuau © � . _ _- ...- __..._..._....._._ _ _- �• `_ � _ . -019Y e`er' 10 a `yri"� 6E$N�D ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - SIL�J FENCE LL LL L_5 LMW%9i - INSERT '�1D� / q � INTRgSAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL- BARRIER tNp Ye M VIM _ 1 \ I'a� z \rs q.. err u< 10' 00 W, as w�sszu SCALE 1' - 20' - Op.. -" I D " - ]m r> W • alp � � F. ory u.n.i TD m m DUSTING BUILDING — � D I W p� p1ANx{N p M I .O vws rmml rm wmn o M mommoeu. .. Y�po 'at.] npvl , p �.onv.� m LL I °E9 MJ()J I BULDING I ° S p�ac tusYmm+..rvmnwm 5x0.0 �•'i en? � � � I � �[ [ muwl c Iwwwe m ' w I u= - ❑ m .nw.. cwim II m OlM1ni pM a'] -]fn ED eQe �ca L m.nvwo.e l.meam 1 wuYn. Imc 89° 1'3 "g .: ,, ° e •Ir mba.c a n... e<� . a31an -lupax 3 — ° Nns Inallf�v s Eor .. x,lso lwsuau © � . _ _- ...- __..._..._....._._ _ _- �• `_ � _ . -019Y e`er' 10 a `yri"� 6E$N�D ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - SIL�J FENCE LL LL L_5 LMW%9i - INSERT '�1D� / q � INTRgSAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL- BARRIER 10 a `yri"� 6E$N�D ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - SIL�J FENCE LL LL L_5 LMW%9i - INSERT '�1D� / q � INTRgSAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL- BARRIER N �%PING. DRAIN69E, AND EROSIO CONTROL PLAN • s0® mus I z LLI L cr 40' .1 LLI LLJ —j LU O z 0 0 0 R O C200 N89*51 0 13 (y wvmeaR 3" :� i. PLAZA AREA xim PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 855.5± FFE 056 FFE 050 LFE 1 844 LFE 21 844 LFE 2 832 WE 032 0 P6 DROP OFF EE CANOPY b------- 9 PROPOSED BUILDING FF 656 LFE E I B44 LFE 2 832 GREEN ROOF PARCEL #2--" __$89-51'35"E RT III AN NDV. NMM V 0 IDT 44 KSO C Ig-'� EXISTING BUILDING '. — • 1— —) IMEMM Iffilmm I 20— ME- N -- ----- ---- 20, 10, 0 20, 40' 1. 2(y ANU 01 Z ==M-1 I, I.. Zw wilWill H!. UM F- A Z Lu is Lij _j LLI 911.=i w, fL, W_�m�e.._ � WES—" ONE NMrAXR IMM EMQU MM MaRDL a INMRATIDN 7ANK �AIL NDV. NMM V 0 IDT 44 KSO C Ig-'� EXISTING BUILDING '. — • 1— —) IMEMM Iffilmm I 20— ME- N -- ----- ---- 20, 10, 0 20, 40' 1. 2(y ANU 01 Z ==M-1 I, I.. Zw wilWill H!. UM F- A Z Lu is Lij _j LLI 911.=i G,S�E PLAN N 47 Mill cc H All z ui UJ —j wp-1 0406 Sam. G,S�E PLAN N 47 Mill cc H All z ui UJ —j wp-1 0406 Pmhgmmramehm� tpop,�acrum,eb,Pmb,YSmmmpm,h �,. W hmPpnm tr Neb.m CSltrmbm bm W.ap df V mmmseMUUbOn veMe.W,tr.WrYrro. uYPln.pdnhnmeummNpPUrmw.PmaPims Ggtl Wtrrwbl�gwn `NpnuP,PY wvwhuPmbee..6 eyhmubrvmgP. aw oy uevaibPmouipn rv. Ya.vmh potr. - a ve. neu, v, ypvma�awva .mp- rw.w.pmwrobWa.Yq.�b cpYem.r.vu.avvn • mle. Ylhmrp,mm.PM ptlnln 4,emw,Ym wMpebauumu wmwuYw Y ,eaawWmbnYwbu,yPla . h�,m.b. PUOamn ooNU ieegmmrmbbm mmdbu � suNmP®ahwwr.r,oaa NU Spmmearvee .YPakevaai trna Mhtlm°, tree wtrPhnm. pew,rmw her bwp.pemae.mwrmpm ® nP,o0 � Pmmwden Yrvotrmm,mmdw ab d[mro Peuh,YIPSNeRdM.mmeu w,mu,PymaO, Si. - .` emama,.p,�, 1 . m+ Nmmd..... NC ..amm ®a,®.srmwr...�c.gimme.m.w, hem. Emha. PnmmmN, wtra mw.,.. aam. m, mwq. �n. m, em.. :.,m..nw.a.�am.e...aam.mwa®m,.m Pmb..em, h,.a r eam.e a mar tr w.m r mPw mnm, tl w m. r w Peedh, d Pm. r.PPmb. .. ... ®a"n°.m�.m,: n.�.m"ra,°mehm'm..w,am�mur�. m,. awmnPm.. ah. ee„ ew. be, wu.. w. P.. Y..., �a. P,.. whmmame .,.ra,aP®.m:a.vYmr.ww.mrsme. e.eme aomo,wmwm.rrPrdnmia ��__ C!1 umuq..luYiu..u,m..neew . aam . ap:.Miweurm.m,mmMnpo brrv,wP.lamwM. FlaereryawesuarWmem pan pbeAmapaYnw .m..vmwm raWimwsmmm.sr uu4 �a`w�iLUmwvaa./m� �uuvm Ppomm®cm® WsO,�u.�emiaY.o. �Ywevl Y trtlmoYmmYb � ltrmmmbaosYlYW tl,wmlP�.emmue mb,W,omdP. aaePms,mn OiatYn wWasmN.N,wabra �L THEE PFOTECf10N DETAIL v oPVme.am� vmm,nn.pvvrsr mhbyo... Dora. mayPe, mau, m. w, uiv. pu. eramsu ..urpm.m,rv.wawmmvm.mawe.merw row, pmem,m.w..wum.wmv mmm.orvrepnn mv,..rwonn „ mmP.,,.. mwm, er, mpm. rwmae. �., a, ..,e<.,rYw.,m,�.mm...ane.a�.P.w me,mw:,,�aavom+Pmn.wmm,,. �.....btrwmtr. n.amreo.smwo:�.. ' wT.tl m�ePeaNtr�wPPtlpP� 'w.nebm.h.mm.nmP•.,.eam w. m. r. e., w. Y..... w., r. m.. mra., rw. .,mY..w..an:.mmombinv.PU.erma�a a, a.eowmnPpN.m.m,.oe<P.,Y . r. DETAILS NOTES AND SCHEDULES• TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION PLAN Zry_ Iwt� , Wlae,Bf f3� } E 9] f F IN gEF�i , 9 i &35i z,— Oj h a � �m tl F S q. y Z� % tl @. go w I CL I I I �j I. Z9 0 LU 2 w l la W E 19A n S Pl=tina Palette: S ©.,, mw �e Landscape Notes erem. .mwud,s m...,m.aa+.mmm.a . ammwomaama . amn'sm mr sew wwe r e.ew a noma w rsww s r q.+r.ms a e.�> aesq.. � o�.e raw+. we_ r... e. e. .....a.o�.. >.n..ew..,...e.m.... � w�.ar�mm� wumamm.r. ®_m.wmmm.a.ww mr s_.eu. w`�.esw.m.o� ` . .aw_m.a_e•am...a.m®m.me..wemaw . a' w+osmm�.aee.vn.a_m �mwa ww°awmmx�imn��ue.w ou�p®mo.vay.:..�MOmu' .. .e�.a.wre.o..m s+mmwww.nw®uwamwam_sararymr .emu �wwm.wmmre.,mrar.. urm.,r:.wrm..._.e . rue..r . wr,y .._wrm�w.m. am�.m.e..ma.e.w. maae°w_rsmsm.ra. m wrymmu mmmmw.uwusawrww . mwpeamwswm. ate, ems. mwr,. �, ssrwwv.a.me.m.i_wm,w�,.rssmm7.e ee.war.�s.m�a. • �ww�m._. a ..ortn..m.m.aaw..w...w...amwe.e. as _m.aray..srm.amm_.m�su.ewa.ve.n LANDSCAPE PLAN ' DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES: Zpo jjjy r §6y i LU g ® Q�f. SRI k eg s �y° a i as b IB! "l; {YYE gEg SjA $i� �Yb�e u p 9 ' r 9 si,t4 �A: HE HIM "9 . U K O; O Z a( I W 9 ra LL, i d Sa W @ °." L101 mot sva���E�vE� �ma� so �ma� Mmm aS E 'OEM= E"' cz= S ©.,, mw �e Landscape Notes erem. .mwud,s m...,m.aa+.mmm.a . ammwomaama . amn'sm mr sew wwe r e.ew a noma w rsww s r q.+r.ms a e.�> aesq.. � o�.e raw+. we_ r... e. e. .....a.o�.. >.n..ew..,...e.m.... � w�.ar�mm� wumamm.r. ®_m.wmmm.a.ww mr s_.eu. w`�.esw.m.o� ` . .aw_m.a_e•am...a.m®m.me..wemaw . a' w+osmm�.aee.vn.a_m �mwa ww°awmmx�imn��ue.w ou�p®mo.vay.:..�MOmu' .. .e�.a.wre.o..m s+mmwww.nw®uwamwam_sararymr .emu �wwm.wmmre.,mrar.. urm.,r:.wrm..._.e . rue..r . wr,y .._wrm�w.m. am�.m.e..ma.e.w. maae°w_rsmsm.ra. m wrymmu mmmmw.uwusawrww . mwpeamwswm. ate, ems. mwr,. �, ssrwwv.a.me.m.i_wm,w�,.rssmm7.e ee.war.�s.m�a. • �ww�m._. a ..ortn..m.m.aaw..w...w...amwe.e. as _m.aray..srm.amm_.m�su.ewa.ve.n LANDSCAPE PLAN ' DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES: Zpo jjjy r §6y i LU g ® Q�f. SRI k eg s �y° a i as b IB! "l; {YYE gEg SjA $i� �Yb�e u p 9 ' r 9 si,t4 �A: HE HIM "9 . U K O; O Z a( I W 9 ra LL, i d Sa W @ °." L101 mot �ma� so �ma� Mmm S ©.,, mw �e Landscape Notes erem. .mwud,s m...,m.aa+.mmm.a . ammwomaama . amn'sm mr sew wwe r e.ew a noma w rsww s r q.+r.ms a e.�> aesq.. � o�.e raw+. we_ r... e. e. .....a.o�.. >.n..ew..,...e.m.... � w�.ar�mm� wumamm.r. ®_m.wmmm.a.ww mr s_.eu. w`�.esw.m.o� ` . .aw_m.a_e•am...a.m®m.me..wemaw . a' w+osmm�.aee.vn.a_m �mwa ww°awmmx�imn��ue.w ou�p®mo.vay.:..�MOmu' .. .e�.a.wre.o..m s+mmwww.nw®uwamwam_sararymr .emu �wwm.wmmre.,mrar.. urm.,r:.wrm..._.e . rue..r . wr,y .._wrm�w.m. am�.m.e..ma.e.w. maae°w_rsmsm.ra. m wrymmu mmmmw.uwusawrww . mwpeamwswm. ate, ems. mwr,. �, ssrwwv.a.me.m.i_wm,w�,.rssmm7.e ee.war.�s.m�a. • �ww�m._. a ..ortn..m.m.aaw..w...w...amwe.e. as _m.aray..srm.amm_.m�su.ewa.ve.n LANDSCAPE PLAN ' DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES: Zpo jjjy r §6y i LU g ® Q�f. SRI k eg s �y° a i as b IB! "l; {YYE gEg SjA $i� �Yb�e u p 9 ' r 9 si,t4 �A: HE HIM "9 . U K O; O Z a( I W 9 ra LL, i d Sa W @ °." L101 w O O LL w W a a O H i 4 4E6�y ��3 4 1 �ya @pyy11 1i'9a 1 = ! A aAi zg Wl LU 1a Ld N ' � �- 71I����INI��I:��lI►,1!IIIIIII co 0 ■ I •IL 41 Will of LL w O O LL w W a a O H i 4 4E6�y ��3 4 1 �ya @pyy11 1i'9a 1 = ! A aAi zg Wl LU 1a Ld N ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -� 1 I I aam _ d^ I Y I I I I I I 1 1 I j � I I a- i I I I N ( ^III 1 I I I I � I II V --. �I i���llll I I � i I I Li .L► I I i I I I II I 1 I I 1 I I I ! 1- I i 1- I 1. I I 1 I I I I I I 1 � J- II I I ' I J_ L------- - - - - -- U WSE i� �ee 8 i9� �e ee NSF E � €i a 7 7 I, C r--------------------------------------------------------=--------------------------------------- I I qR1' _ F", I I Y I I I I 04- I I I I I I o- I I I I I I I - I I N I 1 I 1 — II I I I ' �..�I ---I— — I I I 4 — I I ' I ' I i I I I I I ' I I I I I I I � I I I I � 1 � I I I I 1- I I I I i I 1- I I I I ' - I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I ' I ' I i ------- - - - - -- I- ' r =Fib gggel _xx a� 9 z w n w J w BUILDING SUMMARY SITE AREA: 138,650 SF - (3.18 ACRES) BUILDING AREA: 207,059 SF FAR: 1.49 GROSS RENTABLE AREA: 162,670 NET RENTABLE ESTIMATE: 152,910 UNITS: 160 - 50 UNITS PER ACRE Floor Area Ratio Level FAR Area LEVEL P1 4,926 SF LEVEL 1 45,839 SF LEVEL 1.5 18,585 SF LEVEL 2 47,664 SF 340'- 0" Floor Area Ratio Level FAR Area LEVEL 3 30,042 SF LEVEL 4 30,042 SF LEVEL 5 28,856 SF ROOF / LEVEL 5.5 1,106 SF zut.uoa sr --- --- - - -- -- --------------------------------------------------------------- 98' -7" 113' -5" 128' -0" I I Q _ i ' RESIDENT - - -} UNITS- L i - -- I I I I II I II I � I I Io i I I I I I I I IL I REST AURA)IT I — * IMPI PARK NIDDJNTI'pJ I I jCOURTYAt2D ]yERVICE LwADING I 1 - -D.00K --- ---- - -' - -- ! c - - 'T-- - - -j -- 'O�- -� - -= - - -j- - - - AIL I � O, N RY zo J r I I I I I DROP 6FF `e ^ I COMMERCIAL - -- CANOPY -I4-- -- -:1— —� -- -- j-- _SPACE —_ —. I I I I! II I II I I I I I I t �II RE IDENTIAL I - -� - -R SIDE 4AL -- — �- -- _LL_ —_ —_— LOBBY 1— — _—__GOIMMERCIALSPAJE-/--- ' Uf ITS' RESTAU T I I �'N I ' i I I I I II I II I I I I I I I 1 GREEN I I I I bUTDOO TENANT SPA E GREEN I RAMP TO COMMERCI N i ROOF I I I RpOF PARKIN, G L--- - - - - -- - -- --------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - 139'- 6„ 37' - 1" 0 73, _ 9„ 78'-9" 346'- 7" Parking On Site Level Stalls Per Level LEVEL P2 267 LEVEL P1 227 LEVEL 1 12 506 i C�; I T I I i I I I I i I I I I I I _ I , I i oil I a— 1 I J- -i I I I I I I I I ' §§ e SS :� ziEt ��3 a - -- -4. A110 it -- - - - - -- i iTi��� I m I I o-j - -j - � I -} --� -- � � j f -I-= I i F--- i � I j---- - - { - -- F--- I j----- I- - --j -- 1-- - -F -�- Io I I I I i 1 �- BIKE — ! I - I- •- _I- - -_ -- !— ! ! I I I OPEN T01 BELO�/V I --r —�- ' I I T?RAG II I � — y - - - + -- ! I ! - I I ! _ I � - Y I ! I 1 71 !! ! !! ; ! I I 1 OPEN TO BELOW I 1 1 I Ir - I I - I RESIDENTIAL VNI1 I !( I I I OPEN TO BELOVY I I I I I I I I �•/„� I �1 _— �_L -- _ _ -- _— PENTO ELO — i MI�ENITY � I TENANT A SPAQq !_I I I i i I I I I I I II I II 1 o� -J - -1 !- L--- IL L 1-- I I I I 1 L---------------------------------------------------- - - - -'�! - - -i- ---- - - o ------------------------------------------- - -�- ' -�- t4�i z �byA c n 9 0 z w ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ ' I Q Q I I Q Q Q I I I Q I � Q _ Q I IT O I Q Q I I Q Q Q I I I Q Q I I II I I BIKE I _ _ � GREEN ROOF I I 44:- at - -J --I- -- -� -- - - -i- - - iO� - - -�- - - -^ - - --, -� -�- i ' RE IAL I UNITS IDENT ' I I I I RESIDENTIAL C}- { - -�$' -; -- fi -- t-I-- I---- i- i - - - - -- - - t--- r- -UNF�S - - - -- I -- - i -r -1- I - GREE I ESIDENTIAL I I I I I o-1 -�� r l - I -1 I - -- I I �- - -- I I --- I U I I- - -� - -- - I I I - -� - -- -- - -- - -�- -- - -� -�- I I =1 I I I I I II II i I I °'r'I I I i IF I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I &-` -J - `J -y - - -L ` --u- - -! - -- - - -�- - `- - -I - -- i OUTDOOR TE NT AMMiNITY 1 -- -` -�- L----------------------------------------- - - - - -- 0----------------------------------------- - - - - -J -jl Is6 r w J W A126 ----------------------------------------------- 1 I I q I ! I I QQ T I I I I q I Q Q Q Q Q Q I I I I I 7 I T q Q I I I I II I 1 ' I I � I I II I II I I I I I I I I IE I I �Ll I - - - -�- ---- --- �- - -- -I -- -I - - -�- -'- - - -- - - -� - �- ' °v4 I I I i t I I RESIDENItIAL UNIT$ I I - I I (I_�I V , -- --I-- IMOP W - - - -I RESrDeIVn- UNIT � I I I I I I I II II II I --- -1 - - -_ �— —�— _ —� I —� —J- I , I I I I, I I I I I I ' II - ---------------------------------------------- IJ -L -- Ji L -- 1L--- I I I 1--- J - - -i- - 1 - - -L -- - I -- ! -�_ =----------------------------------------------- -0 9 N I g list R re7[ �- g R$ 6eR e�9 s'e s ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------- - - - - -� TQ I I� Qq I ! Q � I Q Q Q I I Q q Q I ! I Q I Q I I I I I I I !I I II I I I ! ! I I -- j - : - -j- - -- �j - - - -j - - --- - - - - - - - -- �- -� - -- - -: - i - - - - -� I Ft 0 I ! I I I I I I II ! ! I ! RESIDEkTIAL I II I I UNITS I ° I I I I I I I I I II I I J� -- I- -t—I —t — RESIDE — - -I -- — — - - I -I —i- I I I I I II I II I UNIT I I I I I I I o- -L —J - -1 —I-- — — -- --- I- - -J - -- - - -�— — - --� -- — - - -L —J- I I I I I I I I I I 111.4 II l'I' --- —IIm I W111 I I I I I I I I ' J - -- - -- -- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - -- L- ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- - - - - -J Itirld 1411 � '�elp A3+p ��998 � i73 G � ,Y� ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � - - - - -� I 1 I I I I ??T �T T I I I T I I I I I I I I f I I I I I i i o—� — I - - +—I- I— -- H -I - - - -I I— -- I- - -i - -- I -- h— —I - - DOOR T -- 3 fMMENII �- I I I I I II I II I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I II I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I 1 I I I I II I I II 1 I I I I I I I I I,Q o- 1- I I -I - I -t- I- -I--- I I I --Ir -I- II I -- m--- II I--- 1- -- 1 I I IDENTIAL - - - -r- RESUNITS -- - —- ' I - - -r -1- I1 1 I 11 I I I II I I 1 11 I I I I I I I I I 3 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I — I-- I I I +—F - +- HII7il,'— 11 I - -I RESIDE14 I I I —i- iU I - � I I I I I II I II I UNIT I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I II II I I I I I I I I I' I I I II I II rl I I I I ( I I ' .1II --- ��---------- i--------------- I------ 1 V -------------------------------------------- - - - - =- - ---------------------------------------- - - -L_ - - - - -J 7410 z w s � tl N 2 Y 11 — Los 111 I:" 13; 7y Mu 11-1 A i NO I M! rwl� jil ILI P-1 -1 JLjjLLj I11111 1 I'm Jill ' I I wal IM11111 avll "M K, i III PlY ` 1. 1111 ;1h91tje�`l,r. . rY 'W' 81Mq 1 w WO" Emil-iffiffiffilms RUN I Emil 7- I Op In W WOR." ®R ! 77-P MITI iffil RI I !a _r - - - li, I M m i0q.swetido !I lrll wM ■ ff oi R !1 r R 9 R 1 Hi I In Q !Rp i W■1111 11 I kno 11111111 Jim M N R MS-W, MWM�— PIR iiiwiii� A R 1 N w iRi Atl W) aaal WI W1 _j Lugll'� A200 1 c, M� X RM m I m `._ . 1—I qq q a 0 11i $ 3` Ep ' p6j�ji S +1» � 9c1� 3 0 m n aKD a a __ 111111 li�yli Q� is li: ill]I11 e.eesae FI ©1111111 li ■ li ■ ■ 11 et li en 11 e1 .11 m 11 eu 11 e1 - ■ ■1 ■ ■��I��lifi�i ■ ■" 1� �Illllu li ■ li i i' Ili ie1 �� - - - - -- - - [] - - ■ � ��1—� - � L■�.— l. 11 �a1 1.1.� �1 1.1.� � ��e1 �11: � ,e1 : ■ioi�7.l ioil1i11��� �■�::I�� ■�� � i�oi�i�,.o:'♦i11i�1 ■1�1 ■I�il1i .oa,: �9,.orlillJ11 Pro �J 11 ■ ■s ait1il11� ■ ■ ■I■ ■ ■�i11i�.11.��..■ 11 pp�pp�a7• •� p� pe sari it ■ ■sail ■ ill 1� ■ ■ ■INN ■� IIi i.o.i "■ ■il i.sa�ll�i A ■ ■ ■Ii■ ■A MEN .o _��MRI —\ ilill \ i ill ill LII ■ ■i.1 ■ ■i1117 ■JI ■� - m� : e. ■ .o� : o. ■'gI�a '■W :' o■ ■ �.� i t o■ ■'moo ■ ,` ■11 .■ 71; 1 L-51 loin, a ' I - J w I Hill! aW I-- Z CW LLJ —j LLI A250 NO �� NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 11. = 30'-0" E WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1" = 30' -0" ----,LEVEL ROOF 3 LEVEL ROOF 2 _LEVEL ROOF 15.5 LEVEL 5 _. LEVEL 4 'E PANEL 1 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 CONCRETE LEVEL 1.5 LEVEL1 I�XS��iI LEVEL ROOF 3 _ LEVEL ROOF 2 LEVEL ROOF /5.5 __LEVEL5 LEVEL4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 _ ___LEVEL 1.5 LEVEL 1 0 Alk U Z W H, IN m!o 'N co Z O Z W Q LU J C W uiC 0' 0 J w LI w Z200 SHEET REFERENCE 9 ill FIN 01 E 1! 1! m m If A IRM M 11 son 11 IN rol-A—M rffi-- �_� INS 0.4 *no iiii. --ri ill M M M 11 1 III' M IM ----- IIT — - - P ..I -' 1111 M lug - M M M 91 a1 M M M 1! nl L_ IN M 1, miss I I NINON I I canal "RIPHIM. " :! of 761 \Wf rir M M M M lug - M M M 91 a1 M M M WE I m Rim lli Iljl o— WE I m �e w Ti ONE gaw a`oou In Z O Q Z w W C LD G x O W w J I— W w Z203 SHEET REFERENCE I __LEVEL ROOF /5.5 COMPOSITE PANEL 1 LEVEL 5 b LEVEL4 -- _. -- BRICK 1 — LEVEL 3 b COMPOSITE PANEL 2 LEVEL 2 BRICK 2 BRICK 2 LEVEL 1.5 ._LEVEL 1 COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION — 1 V = 30' -0" STUCCO 2 COMPOSITE PANEL 1 COMPOSITE PANEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 b k b LEVEL 1.5 JH LEVEL 1 BRICK ENTRY TO RESIDENTIAL BRICK2 b/ PARKING COURTYARD EAST ELEVATION 2 �e w Ti ONE gaw a`oou In Z O Q Z w W C LD G x O W w J I— W w Z203 SHEET REFERENCE I S b b � b 8 � 4 k b b b A � h Ilk COURTYARD NORTH ELEVATION 1" = 30' -0" s b b � b s R b R b ��COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION` 1"=30'-O" LEVEL ROOF 3 LEVEL ROOF 2 LEVEL ROOF 15.5 LEVEL 5 LEVEL4 LEVEL3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1.5 LEVEL 1 LEVEL ROOF 3 LEVEL ROOF 2 LEVEL ROOF 15.5 LEVEL5 STUCCO 1 _ LEVEL4 LEVEL3 LEVEL 2 _LEVEL 1.5 LEVEL 1 t w F- �s ;8r pie �$ay$ a'W U) Z O .Q Z > W _5 J W d' W a-- J W W W 2202 SHEET REFERENCE 0 :00 AM SCALE V -2001.0• Jrj NOON ',:ALE V-200'.0- 3:00 PM � Sr IE i'•2py -0' November 4, 2014 F iNA015A ®J ■ �l ARC111IiCTJRE INC. 9:00 AM KALE NOON 3:00 PM -CALE V-200'-D' November 4, 2014 �=-- DJR F I - -- 9:00 AM z 5CAL - -- s- T- ` i_ n . - v1� + �!+�.�► SCALE V-200 4)' Y November 4, 2014 116001iD DJR `r� J+C�JIt I- i1r) juns li, 2M4 —qkptrh Rendering DJ R Ln � slim - -_, ' -_-_. IN Q-- �7 June =, 2x14 gkatt h RPndQring _ ®JR NHH PROPERTIES DJR DESIGN: BUILD: MANAGE Nrr..iii7r:ciin F.IN(7. Ayes Scherer, roeder, Carr and Staunton. Nay, Lee, Olson, PI er rest. Motion failed 4 -4. Commissioner Carr mo o ommend preli rezoning approval contingent on approval of the variances. C - iss er seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Olson, Carr, Platteter, taunton. Nay, Lee. Motion to rezone approved 7 -1. A discussion ensued o l' uld happen if the site wa �_�d and the double wasn't built; would the single family onconforming. Planner Teague it would be nonconforming; howe ' as a single family home it would have to be built is today. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 7200 France Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission a request to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 3.51 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue has been made. Teague said the applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a six and four -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 170 unit apartment (6 stories) (20% affordable) ➢ 25 units of row housing. (4 stories) 45,500 square feet of retail space including two restaurants. ➢ A two -level underground parking ramp. Teague noted the retail space would be located on the France side of the project. Access to the residential portion of the development would be from 72 "d Street. Access to the retail portion would be off of France Avenue. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories to 6 stories. ➢ Housing Density — from 30 units per acre to 50. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.88. A rezoning of all the property would then be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Page 6 of 13 ` J i Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis DJR Architects and Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation. Discussion Commissioner Lee asked what the zoning of the subject site is and if the existing building was non - conforming. Planner Teague responded the subject site is zoned POD, Planned Office District and the building is non - conforming. Teague said the redevelopment is proposed to incorporate elements of the mixed use zoning district. Applicant presentation Mr. Dovolis addressed the Commission and explained in his opinion the geometry of the site works well with the proposed redevelopment. Dovolis explained the goal is to create a gracious entry off of France Avenue that would be an improvement for the City and will enhance the character of the neighborhood. Dovolis pointed out the mixed use aspects of the proposed redevelopment would provide the following: 0 The proposed building will replace an existing building with paved surface parking lot. 26,500 square feet of retail /office space. 0 195 residential housing units to include an affordable housing element (20 %). 0 570 parking spaces. 0 Majority of the parking spaces would be located within the building (underground) creating a better visual environment. 0 Maintain and enhance green space area to the west. • Development of roof deck(s), green space and rain gardens. 0 Commercial traffic off France Avenue. • Residential traffic off West 72nd Stree.t • Improvement of storm water rates. • Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Dovolis concluded in his opinion the proposed redevelopment would be a nice evolution along France Avenue providing both housing and retail. Dovolis introduced Laurie Boisclair to further speak to the affordable housing element of the project. Ms. Boisclair explained that there is an 80%/20% split of market rate to affordable housing. Boisclair said a survey found that the pay rate of those qualifying for "affordable" housing make between $18.00- $25.00 per hour. Discussion With respect to the affordable housing element Commissioner Scherer asked when the units "turn- over" will the affordability component also carry over. Ms. Boisclair responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest asked if a square footage per unit was established. Ms. Boisclair responded that she believes a one bedroom unit would be roughly 800 square feet. Unit size would increase thereafter. Page 7 of 13 A/l Chair Staunton asked if the proposed townhomes are vertical. Mr. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Kilberg commented that he appreciates the step down element of the building and that special attention was paid to retaining the landscaped buffer on the west. Kilberg said in his opinion the proposal as presented does a good job of balancing density and height. Kilberg acknowledged that the area was designated in the Comprehensive Plan as four stories; however, at first look the proposal appears promising to him. Concluding, Kilberg encouraged the development team to pay special attention to finding traffic solutions pointing out this area is heavily travelled. Commissioner Lee said she finds the proposal interesting and exciting; however does have concerns with traffic. She added it has been her experience that the speed of traffic along this stretch of France Avenue is high and suggested the addition of turn lanes and broadening the zone along France Avenue. Mr. Dovolis agreed traffic needs to be carefully considered adding the project introduces a "slip lane" that is needed to guide and calm traffic into the site. Continuing, Lee questioned why six stories are needed. Dovolis said height is needed to afford the underground parking. He said the proposed density allows amenities and improves the aesthetics of the site by locating the majority of parking underground. Dovolis acknowledged there is a balance of density to use. Commissioner Platteter said he also finds this an interesting project. He further suggested when formal application is made that the applicant provide materials indicating building heights in the surrounding area. Platteter added he is also concerned with the slip lane and ramp access /valet parking. Continuing, Platteter said he appreciates the podium height; however there may be too much height on France Avenue. Platteter stated he's not opposed to six stories; however much depends on where those six stores are located. Commissioner Carr said she too is interested in the proposal; however, finds the building mass along France Avenue too much. Carr suggested more articulation in building wall through, colors or angles. Continuing, Carr asked where guest parking was located. Mr. Dovolis responded that guest parking would be in the underground garage, adding there are also a few "short term" parking spaces at grade. Commissioner Carr asked if bike racks are provided. Dovolis responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Olsen acknowledged the mix of uses; however, said she was struggling with the density, building mass and traffic. Olsen said in her opinion much hinges on the traffic study and what it reveals. She also said the development team needs to work carefully with a traffic engineer and with the County. Concluding, Olsen suggested a more straight connectivity and the addition of a traffic signal. Mr. Dovolis responded they are working with a traffic engineer and are looking at introducing a curb less design will bollards. Dovolis said they are trying to achieve a different effect with this redevelopment. Continuing, Dovolis said he would continue to focus on traffic and the pedestrian mix with the hopes of "enhancing this area ". Dovolis said he was also considering tying the project with the open space to the north by developing a playground /public area that would benefit not only the residents of the building but the City. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged sustainability aspects of the project; however asked the applicant to provide a more detailed and measurable plan prior to formal application. Page 8 of 13 0 Commissioner Schroeder said at this time he doesn't have an issue with the mix of uses or density; however, does have a concern that future residents of the building will cut through the neighborhood to go north /west. Schroeder pointed out a residential neighborhood and school are located to the north and west of the subject site and special attention needs to be paid to the potential for cut through traffic. Continuing, Schroeder said he also has a concern with traffic maneuvering and traffic movements from both France and West 72nd Street. Schroeder acknowledged while the project has much to like about it he believes traffic will be the major drawback. Schroeder said he was supportive of connecting the open space to the north with the project as a playground /public space; however, believes that area may be "open space" to filter storm water for the neighborhood. Concluding, Schroder said the architecture is good, but the access points are difficult. Chair Staunton stated he echo's comments from other Commissioners; adding he likes the mixed use aspect of the project but believes there are some challenges with circulation; acknowledging that the mixed use concept does spread out the traffic. Continuing, Staunton said he was not alarmed by the height; however, there was a reason the Comprehensive Plan deliberately guided this area for no more than four stories. Staunton acknowledged at the time the Comprehensive Plan was revised the City was operating on the premise that four stories west of France Avenue was best. Staunton said in this instance the Commission and Council need to figure out if this is still the case and what this area of Edina can handle. Concluding, Staunton said he's not opposed to the redevelopment plan; it has promise; however, the City needs to be sure this type of density can be handled in this area. Chair Staunton thanked Mr. Dovolis and Ms. Boisclair for their presentation, adding he looks forward to the formal application. B. Sketch Plan — 4121 West 50th Street Planner Tea said the Planning Commission is being asked to consider etch plan request to allow a change use of the existing two -story apartment building at I West 50th Street. The proposal is to co ue the multi - family use on the first floor and • er level, and remodel the second floor into o space. A PUD rezoning is therefore osed to allow for the mixed use within the building. The existing building contai mE bathrooms and are roughly I, remodeled. There are no plans tc would simply be for a remodel of would maintain the two residen on the first floor; and remo residential uni ost units have 2 bedrooms, with 1.5 qua re fee size. The building recently was significantly ? an r modify the exterior of the building. The proposal h floor interior and change of use. The proposed plan nits " the basement or lower level; maintain the four units three un on the third floor into office space The property is curt y zoned Planned Residents istrict 4, PRD -4 and is guided, MXC, Mixed Use Ce�n e.7he MXC allows multifamily residA&I and office space. Therefore, the proposed ould be consistent with the Comprehensi Ian. The ollowing would therefore be required to accommodate the request: ➢ Rezoning from PRD -4, Planned Residential District -4 to PUD, Planned unit development Page 9 of 13 acs J � Minutes /Edina Cif Council /July 15, 2014 Ben HackA 7105 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the Council. Member enson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to clos the public hearing. Ayes: Benne Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carrie Mr. Teague addres\sitedr aised during public testimony on types of variances t had been considered in this area. Mr. indicated his building footprint included all uses o . he block but even when considering only tial -type uses; his proposal remained in line wit a average structure. The Council discussed al and asked,questions of Mr. Mortense/r. Teague relating to use of the lower level anage. Support was expressed for the imesign, sustainability aspects, and redevelopmendered on either side by a parking lot. Council Discuss ion & Action Council concern was expressed lated to the requested lot co rage variance, lack of hardship required for variance consideration, storm ter drainage, ineffective I _ tion of two rain gardens at the rear of the property, and potential risk of san' ry infiltration and infl due to proposed excavations that lacked positive surface drainage. Member wenson introdu and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -79, Denying Preliminary R oning from to R -2; Lot Area and Width Variances; Building Coverage Variances; an • Side Yar etback Variances, based on the following findings: 2.01 The variance criteria are not el 2.02 The current zoning is consiste 2.03 The multiple variances reques zoning. 2.04 There are no practical diffi ti property owner does not rop prohibited by the Zonin Ordi ordinance requirement when M the Comprehensive Plan. demonstrate the property is not suitable for R -2 in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The L to use the property in a reasonable manner It is not reasonable to deviate from the is nothing unique about the property that riances is caused by the applicant's desire to the site. :s ith the two -story single family currently justifies the variances. he need for build such a large tw amily dwelling 2.05 Reasonable use of a property exi located on the pr erty. 2.06 The size of the oposed structure creates hi the side yards back variance. 2.07 The City h traditionally not granted v tearing do a home (single - family home or /da posed uilding coverage would be nearly y w' the single family home. agu seconded the motion. , Sprague, Swenson, Hovland le rried . MUNITY COMMENT ared to comment. need for the lot coverage variance, and noes for building lot coverage when plex) and building a new one. riple the building coverage that exists Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.D. SKETCH PLAN — 7200 FRANCE AVENUE — REVIEWED Mayor Hovland explained the purpose of sketch plan review, which did not include a public hearing, noting the application process that followed included four opportunities for public testimony. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 It was noted the proposal was to redevelop the 3.51 -acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue to tear down the existing outdated office building and redevelop it with a six- and four -story mixed use development project. Proponent Presentation Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects, presented elements of the project that included 195 residential units with 40 units being affordable; 26,000 square feet of commercial space; and, underground parking. -Mr. Dovolis displayed colored artist renditions of exterior elevations. Bruce Johnson, landscape architect, presented a landscape plan, noting it would create a lush environment through the use of plants, stones, and water and include winter interest. Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation: and project co- sponsor, described the company's housing portfolio and intention to request housing revenue bonds to allow setting aside 40 affordable units as well as Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to cover the gap in rental disparity between affordable units (81 cents /square foot) to market rate units ($ 1.19 per square foot). The affordability threshold would be 50% of area median income. Ms. Boisclair described the tenant base for affordable units that would be scattered throughout the buildings and of varied design and number of bedrooms. Mat Pascina, SRF Consulting, presented the findings of the independent preliminary traffic analysis. He reported current trip generation from this site was 500 daily trips and the proposed land use would increase it to 2,500 daily trips with retail (accessed from France Avenue) making up two- thirds of that number. Mr. Pascina stated France Avenue, a six -lane facility, could feasibly handle 40,000 to 50,000 vehicles per day. The roadway was currently handling 28,000 vehicles per day, identifying that additional capacity was available. Mr. Pascina explained how the project would minimize impacts to 72nd Street and recommended developing travel demand' strategies for residents and employees. In conclusion, Mr. Pascina addressed points of access, turning movements, sight lines, and truck maneuvers. Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague explained that to accommodate this request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: building height from four stories to six stories; housing density from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre; and, floor area ratio from .5 to 1.88. A rezoning would also be required to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Mr. Teague reviewed concerns of the Planning Commission related to height and density, traffic, and to require' podium height on the France Avenue side. Council Discussion The Council supported this location for multi- residential housing, having a 140 -foot setback from the closest single - family house to the west, building design elements, underground parking, providing varied (I - 3 bedroom) workforce units, not displacing relatively affordable housing, offering a variety of housing units (townhomes and apartments), landscape features, and creation of a green berm /buffer. The Council offered the following recommendations: reduce intensity of the land use (height, massing, floor area ratio, and density); improve the pedestrian streetscape experience; consider eliminating the sidewalk cut -in and extend the curb; provide a significant podium on France Avenue without creating a step -up facing single - family residential; address traffic circulation to prevent neighborhood impact; encourage multimodal transportation by enhancing bicycle facility and providing interior storage; address stormwater management; provide recreational opportunities for tenants; replace asphalt with green space; and, address and mitigate impacts to the City's infrastructure and schools. The Council acknowledged the City would hire, at the developer's expense, a consultant to conduct a traffic study. The development team was encouraged to keep the neighborhood's interests in mind. Page 4 4 / IJ 2 DATE: November 3, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: Chad Millner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: ' 7200 France Avenue — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. Planning Concerns I. Significant planning level concerns for sanitary inflow, stormwater and flood storage exist. Preliminary approvals should be held until agreement is reached on a preliminary stormwater management plan. Survey 2. Consider platting lot and provide 30' right of way for 72 "d Street. Soils 3. Provide soil borings logs and soils report including piezometer groundwater readings to confirm infiltration rates and support groundwater mounding analysis. 4. Provide copy of phase. I environmental review. Details S. City Standard Plates available here: htW: / /edinamn.gov/index-php?section-.:conswuction—standards Traffic and Street 6. Provide traffic analysis and expand scope of 72 "d street improvements to provide dedicated left turn lane from 72nd Street to building. 7. Entrance and driveway must accommodate a design vehicle of Pierce fire truck 12205. See attached sheets. 8. Some architectural sheets show pedestrian access across France Avenue, remove these markings. 9. Provide widths for 72nd Street driving paths and medians. 10. Show pedestrian access across 72nd street and receiving pedestrian ramp on north side of intersection. 11. Proposed France Avenue lighting must remain consistent with Canto light fixtures. Sanitary and Water Utilities 12. Depth of sanitary will required pumped outlet from 2 level underground parking garage. 13. Soil infiltration feature is sited adjacent to and up- gradient of 2 level underground parking. Provide groundwater mounting analysis and design infiltration feature such that groundwater elevation will not intercept low floor garage elevation. 14. Provide hydrant access in the courtyard. EK-GMEMMG D 7450 Beso Bav mid - Ed na. eta 5 www2 =MN. v - 957- U6- B'371- Paz 952 -�-f� M 4j .1 Storm Water Utility 15. France Avenue low point currently flows into 7200 France property. Hydrologic model needs to address modified EOF path for this condition, and grading plan needs to prevent inflow into parking garage. 16. Downstream stormwater system has limited capacity. Provide existing conditions lift station design. Rate will be limited to 0.5cfs or existing conditions, whichever is less. 17. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following links: hops: / /maps.barr.com /edina/ and http:/ /edinamn.gov /index.php?section= engineering water resource 18. The subject property provides conveyance of stormwater and flood storage for adjacent properties to the south through three private easements noted on the ALTA title survey. Provide hydrologic and hydraulic report detailing the proposed changes to rate, volume, flow, flood storage and peak flood elevations. a. Use NOAA Atlas 14 storm probabilities b. Provide storage for LE_20 flood waters 19. Building low floor elevation must follow CWRMP policy 3.1.1.1, be a minimum of T above the 100 year HWL of basin. 20. Provide private maintenance agreement for lift station and associated stormwater infrastructure. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 21. MPCA SWPPP will be required for development plans. Other Agency Coordination 22. Apply for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit and schedule preliminary plan review with District Engineer. 23. Other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES may be required. EN G )EPARTMOU 741 Metro Hw&wd. Edina, WMU=t3 55439 twww • 952-826 -0371 •Fax 9524U6-0392 Additional Bumper Depth Chassis Overhang e( / I , 1 , 1 , I , 1 , I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I � I � I I � � I I � 1 Turning Performance Analysis I 1 1 Axle Track Wheel Offset Cramp Angle Tread Width Parameters: 5/1/2013 Inside Cramp Angle: 45.000 Axle Track: 81.92 in. Wheel Offset: 5.25 in. Tread Width: 16.60 in. Chassis Overhang: 65.99 in. Additional Bumper Depth: 19.00 in. Front Overhang 84.99 in. Wheelbase: 258.00 in. Inside Turning Radius Components Calculated Turning Radii: Description Inside Turn: 20 ft. 4 in. 0078244 Curb to Curb: 36 ft. 8 in. fO Wall to Wall: 41 ft. 1 in. f Front Bumper c4�bT r�'o9 Comments: Aerial Device Truck 12205 Inside Turning Radius Components PRIDE # Description Front Tires 0078244 Tires, Michelin, 425/65822.50 20 ply XZY 3 tread Chassis 0070220 Dash -2000, Chassis, PAP /SkyArm/Midmount Front Bumper 0123625 Bumper, 19" extended, ImpNel Aerial Device 0006900 xxxAerial, 1001 Pierce Platform Notes: Actual Inside Cramp Angle may be less due to highly specialized options. Curb to Curb turning radius calculated for a 9.00 inch curb. Page 1 of 2 4-70 Definitions: Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 Inside Cramp Angle Maxunum turning angle of the front inside tire. Axle Track King -pin to king -pin distance of the front axle. Wheel Offset Offset from the center -line of the wheel to the king -pin. Tread Width Width of the tire tread. Chassis Overhang Distance from the center -line of the front axle to the front edge of the cab. This does not include the bumper depth. Additional Bumper Depth Depth that the bumper assembly adds to the front overhang. Wheelbase Distance between the center lines of the vehicle's front and rear axles. Inside Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle around which the vehicle can turn. Curb to Curb Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the vehicle's tires can turn. This measurement assumes a curb height of 9 inches. Wall to Wall Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the entire vehicle can turn. This measurement takes into account any front overhang due to the chassis, bumper extensions and/or aerial devices. Page 2 of 2 A1( CANTO LIGHT FIXTURE MountIngDoWl 01.21 0 "..6 CONDUIT ame CQVCR 8, CrHEaS OROUT 01/a 9y OTH AX �Sr OTHERS afTna- uO�a,r N6 CANTO STANDARD oatall .I Sr OT4ERS GRCJT tL. 0 A15 P C,—"', a I X30X4 4X 6r CTI;CR: -'0 .. N� For Canto cc."CC orsd CC6000 Consult Factory toe CM00 Mounting Dotail,- CANTO G `Frnce Avenue lighting concept: conceptual light fixture 'urban n design workshop APRIL 1, 2014 — —.1.1- -.M &K In MOW W 4b - - Wenck wenck File #3022 -04 November 6, 2014 Traffic Impact Study for 7200 France Avenue in Edina, MN Prepared for: CITY OF EDINA f Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 A -13 FIGURES FIGURE1 Table of Contents -3 FIGURE 2 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................. ............................1 -1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ....................................................... ............................2 -1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................. ............................3 -1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ...................................................................... ............................4 -1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................ ............................5 -1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... ............................6 -1 7.0 APPENDIX ..................................................................................... ............................7 -1 FIGURES FIGURE1 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................ ............................2 -3 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ............................2 -4 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................ ............................3 -2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES ..... ............................4 -3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES ..... ............................4 -4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY DAILY VOLUMES ..................................................... ............................4 -5 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ......... ............................5 -5 FIGURE 8 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ......... ............................5 -6 i November 2014 Wenck A7$ »♦ r, 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and restaurant /retail development located at 7200 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the southwest corner of the France Avenue /72 "d Street intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by a three story office building. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: 0 France Avenue /70th Street 0 France Avenue /Hazelton Road 0 France Avenue /72nd Street 0 France Avenue /Gallager Drive 0 France Avenue /proposed access 0 72nd Street /proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office building and constructing a new residential and restaurant /retail building. The project includes 521 on -site parking spaces. The proposed land uses and sizes are shown below. Proposed Land Uses and Sizes Land Use Size Unit Apartments 160 DU Quality restaurant 5,000 SF Quality restaurant 9,000 SF Retail 6,000 SF SF = square feet, DU = dwelling units As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both 72nd Street and France Avenue. The access as proposed prohibits left turns onto 72nd Street from the development through the construction of a center median. Left and right turns in and right turns out are allowed. This type of access configuration is known as a three - quarter access because three of the four access movements are allowed. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. As proposed, all residential trips will use the 72 "d Street access while all retail and restaurant trips will use the France Avenue access. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2016. 1 -1 November 2014 Al s- ...... Wenck 7A The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate a net total of 37 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 167 trips during the p.m. peak hour. • Traffic generated by the proposed project does not change the level of service of any movement to an unacceptable level during either peak hour. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • The project trips have minimal impact on the overall traffic operations. No improvements are needed to the surrounding street system to accommodate the proposed project. • Eliminating the access on France Avenue removes the disruptions caused by traffic slowing to enter and exit the site. However, southbound France Avenue has three through lanes, with the outside lane used for slowing traffic at many locations under existing conditions. • From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with all access on 72nd Street results in slightly higher volumes in the neighborhood area west of the site, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • In order for the proposed 72nd Street access to operate as shown, the median and turn lane must be properly designed to eliminate the possibility of lefts turns out. Additional detailed design should be prepared and reviewed to ensure proper operation. 1 -2 November 2014 nck A70 We 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and restaurant /retail development located at 7200 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the southwest corner of the France Avenue /72nd Street intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by a three story office building. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue /70th Street • France Avenue /Hazelton Road • France Avenue /72nd Street • France Avenue /Gallager Drive • France Avenue /proposed access • 72nd Street /proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office building and constructing a new residential and restaurant /retail building. The project includes 521 on -site parking spaces. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The proposed land uses and sizes are shown in Table 2 -1. Table 2 -1 rI UP- Land Use -- - -- Size Unit 160 DU Apartments 5,000 SF Quality restaurant SF Quality restaurant 7,700 Retail 6,000 SF SF = square feet, DU = aweuing units 2 -1 November 2014 �7 Wenck AO As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both 72 "d Street and France Avenue. The access as proposed prohibits left turns onto 72nd Street from the development through the construction of a center median. Left and right turns in and right turns out are allowed. This type of access configuration is known as a three - quarter access because three of the four access movements are allowed. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. As proposed, all residential trips will use the 72nd Street access while all retail and restaurant trips will use the France Avenue access. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2016. 2 -2 November 2014 A 7 � Wenck 2300' Wenck Engineers • Scientists TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 7200 FRANCE AVENUE IN EDINA, MN A7� FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION rD r) OIN RAMPTO PARKING RESIDENTIAL ROW HOUSE STYLE Wenck Engineers • Scientists 72ND STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENT AT 7200 FRANCE AVENUE IN EDINA, MN FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN 7777- VALET II (I II RAMP TO PARKING APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 so, N t 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by a three story office building and surface parking. The site is bounded by France Avenue on the east, 72nd Street on the north, office uses to the south, and residential areas to the west. Near the site location, France Avenue is a six lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. 72nd Street is a two lane roadway. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. France Avenue /70th Street (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through /right turn lane. France Avenue /Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn /through /right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through /right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. France Avenue at 72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound 72nd Street approach. The eastbound approach provides one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and three through lanes. The southbound approach provides two through lanes and one through /right turn lane. Left turns are not allowed from 72nd Street onto France Avenue. France Avenue /Gallager Drive (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through /right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through /right turn lane. 3 -1 November 2014 4:- jWenck of 266 Engineers • Scientists � � T rap TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEVELOPMENTAT 7200 FRANCE AVENUE IN EDINA, MN -4t a FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS t 400 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios . To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2017. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed forthe following scenarios: 2014 Existing. Turn movement volumes collected in October 2014 were used for existing conditions. The existing volume information includes trips generated by uses near the project site. 0 2017 No- Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2017 No -Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was based on both recent growth experienced near the site and expected future growth. 0 2017 Build. Trips generated by the existing office building were removed. and trips generated by the proposed uses were added to the 2017 No -Build volumes to.determine 2017 Build volumes. Trip Generation The expected development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Ninth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent gross total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4 -1. -r,.L 1, n 4. 1AI-1 1— Trin f'cnorntinn fnr Prnnosed Land Uses .- Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Existing Use - removed Office 710 39,600 SF 55 7 62 10 49 59 437 Proposed Uses -added Apartments Quality restaurant Quality restaurant Retail 220 931 931 820 160 DU 9,000 SF 5,000 SF 6,000 SF 16 5 3 4 66 2 1 2 82 7 4 6 65 45 26 11 34 22 12 11 99 67 38 22 1 1064 810 450. 256 Net added by project -27 64 37 137 30 167 2143 SF= square feet, DU= dwelling units 4 -1 November 2014 4%3 _r.rWenck 4- ITEM V1. C. 7200 France Avenue, Edina, MN Correspondence received after packet. e Jackie Hoogenakker prom: Allison Sneller <allisonpirri @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 201410:34 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France proposal Dear Mayor Hovland, Mr. Teague, and the Edina City Council - It is.with grave concern that I again contact you in regards to the proposed *massive *development at 72nd and France. The more I learn about this troubling proposal, the more stunned I am that this is even under consideration by the Edina Planning Commission and the City Council. The fact that this literally abuts a large residential neighborhood is more than enough reason to dismiss this outrageous proposal. Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, this project would have a tremendous adverse effect on the.very nearby Cornelia Elementary. Are you aware of the number of children who walk to school along 72nd St.? Or the number of school buses (from the elementary, middle and high schools) that traverse 72nd St. in the morning and afternoon? Or the fact that our South Cornelia neighborhood provides little to no "exit" options for cars trying to depart this colossal monstrosity?. In fact, the primary exit from the neighborhood would be directly in front of the elementary school? Or the limited access to and from France Ave at 72nd St.? I am also curious as to why such a proposal is even under consideration, given its gross violation of the city's own comprehensive plan. I am also wondering how this possibly fits into the living streets initiative the city is supposedly undertaking. trust you will share my serious concerns -- as well as those of my many neighbors -- at the City Council meeting tonight, as well as with your colleagues on the Planning Commission. This is not an appropriate development for this site! We moved to Edina trusting that the city would look out for the best interests of its residents, not the pocketbooks of developers. Sincerely, Allison Sneller 7208 Cornelia Dr. 952- 406 -8021 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Susan Scheppers <sscheppers @icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:11 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Please follow Staff and Planning Rec to deny proposal!! Dear Jackie, Please.forward the following comments to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the Mayor and all members of the City Council. As Cornelia residents on 72nd St. in Edina, we strongly urge you to do the right thing for the residents of this neighborhood and to Edina. Tell the.developers that this particular site MUST BE REDEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING MASTER PLAN. DO NOT GIVEAWAY OUR TOWN! We believe that the existing Comp Plan with its 4 -story height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of retail on the parcel at the corner of 72nd and france ilS AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE VALID!! Fight for us! Susan and Karl Scheppers° 4437 Claremore DR. (72nd St.) Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackie Homenakker from: L S <lisakl @ymail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 201410:12 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Proposed Rezoning Please forward following comments to Cary Teague, Community Development Director, the Mayor, & all City Council Members. The current Master Comprehensive Plan, which limits height and density js. appropriate for this site. The City should, stay' Within their Master Comprehensive Plan and stop providing.special concessions.to developers. Please follow Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that this proposal be denied, and inform this developer and any other developer that this site must be redeveloped in compliance with the existing master plan. Consider neighborhood-value protection and 72nd & France traffic issues. Best regards, Lisa Schunn 7320 West Shore Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Leo Sioris <Isioris @safetycall.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 7:08 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: property on France and 72nd To All: I am writing regarding the proposed plan for the site at the above listed address. Please forward this email to Cary Teague, the Mayor, and to all members of the City Council. In brief, my wife and I strongly oppose the development being proposed by the developer. We have lived in the neighborhood for over 30 years and have seen many changes, most positive, for the France Ave area. This one is right smack at a major in and out corridor into our neighborhood and will greatly disrupt not only traffic flow into and out of the area but change the character as well with the proposed retail element. We encourage you all to stay with the current City Master Comprehensive Plan. It appears the current plan is working very well and serves its residents. We do not need developers coming in constantly requesting changes to serve their own high profit needs. Development has been well thought out and much time put into the process over many years. One -off variances such as this one do not serve the city or its residents well in the end and encourage further such requests, therefore, why have a plan, commissions, etc in the first place. Also, the traffic and safety issue that will result with this plan, with its close proximity to Cornelia Elementary, are very obvious. Nothing more needs to be said here. Please place a primary focus on our neighborhoods and the interests of our residents and not that of developers. We request that you honor the current City Master Plan and deny this developer's request for changes. Thank you, Leo and Cheryl Sioris 7337 Oaklawn Ave So Leo Sioris, PharmD Chief Executive Officer SafetyCall International, PLLC & Pet Poison Helpline 3600 American Blvd W, Bloomington, MN 55431 direct phone: (952) 852 -4604 1 fax: (952) 852 -4601 Isioris@safetycall.com I www.safetycall.com Professor, Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota Jackie Hooaenakker From: Larry Buechler <lbuechler @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:23 AM To: Jackie Hoogehakker Subject: Proposed zoning changes, at 7200 France I strongly think that it is time for the council to start to listen to the concerns and wishes of the residences of the affected areas when making decisions in the. neighborhoods. When 70% of residents oppose adding sidewalks and making changes in four story height limit in the existing Comprehensive Plan. I would encourage the council to not allow a change in the height limit for the proposed development on 72nd and France and also to oppose the proposed sidewalk program which will destroy the beauty of our neighborhoods! Respectfully, Larry Buechler Sent from my !Pad Jackie Hooaenakker From: Sue Soule <sulb3so @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 2:17 A_ M To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France development proposal Please forward to Director Teague, Mayor Hovland and the City Council. Thank you. Mr. Mayor and City Council Members, I ask that you respect both the work that went into the current Comprehensive Plan and the residents who have the right to expect some consistency and reliability. in regard'to the ordinances and guidelines that affect their homes, neighborhoods and sense of well- being. Lovely, well- maintained homes border this property — homes which may well represent the families' single largest investment. That they should suddenly be subjected to a development. that ignores height, density and retail prohibitions is unthinkable. This neighborhood has already experienced an unreasonable amount of development that has created traffic, safety and quality of life issues. Please, respect the work of your planning professionals, Planning Commission and the process that led to the current Plan guidelines. Please respect your tax- paying residents and the integrity of their neighborhood. Please do not pander to developers. Do what's right. Reject this proposal and any other proposal that exceeds the recommendations of:our Comprehensive Plan. Thank you. Susan Soule 7324 West Shore Drive Edina 1 . Jackie Hooaenakker From: Gubrud, Robert <regubrudl @aim.com> Al Sent: Monday, December -01, 201411:31 PM " To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Zoning Changes: 7200 France Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, We urge you to, adhere to the existing Comp Flan with it's 4 story height limit, FAR requirements, and .prohibition of retail on the:: parcel at the SW corner of 72nd and France. We believe it is the best interests of the residential property owners in the area and the City of Edina that the Council follow Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that this proposal be denied. We further urge the Council to communicate to this and future developers that this site must be redeveloped in compliance With the.existing Master Comprehensive Plan. We request you forward this message to Cary Teague, Mayor Hovland, and the City Council. Thank you Bob Gubrud 4421 Ellsworth Drive Edina, MINI 55435 regubrudl @aim.com 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: nsourova @aol.com Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 6:22 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Objection to the Proposed zoning changes for 7200 France Avenue Dear Edina City Council, This is to voice our strong objection to change of zoning for 7200 France Avenue proposed by or on behalf of the developer who is interested in construction of the building with parameters exceeding Edina zoning restrictions and City Comprehensive Plan in terms of height, living density and floor area ratio. We strongly believe that the existing Comp Plan with its 4 story height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of rental on the parcel at the corner of 72nd and France is and will continue to be valid. We would like to encourage the Council to follow Staff and the Planning Committee recommendation that this particular site — if needs to be redeveloped — must be IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING MASTER PLAN. The proposed now 5 -story building project will create a number of negative impacts, including but not limited with impact on transportation, which especially critical, as 72nd is an outlet street for the neighborhood and as the project will create additional loads on 72nd St and Cornelia Drive (in front of the school) for those who need to go to and from Highway 100; etc. Lastly we'd like to thank City Staff and the Planning Commission for recommendation that the current proposal of redevelopment of 7200 France be denied. Thanks and best regards, Daniel Wise & Natalia Sourova Tel: 952- 832 -0696 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Julie Chamberlain <juliecchamberlain @,gmail.com> . Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 8:34 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Proposal Dear Ms Hoogenakker, I ask that you pass my comments on to Cary Teague, the Mayor, and all members of the City Council. Mr Teague, Mayor, and members of the Council, I am again writing to you about the project at 7200 France Avenue. I am frustrated we need to continue to talk about this, due to the blatant disregard'the developers have for our comprehensive plan. It is insulting to the city and its' residents that the developer has paid no regard to our current zoning codes and continues to push forward a proposal that doesn't even come close to meeting code. A few comments: -The developer dropped the height to "5 stories" but the height of the building only went down 2.5 feet from the initial sketch review in July. A commercial height fora ;building is 12 feet, so a 5 story building should be 60 feet, while their proposal is for 77.5 feet. Sounds a lot like a 6 story building to "me. -the current site allows for office /residential, NOT restaurant and retail, which would require yet, another variance -have we looked at the true impact that such a massive project would have on utilities? Water supply? Drainage? It seems like we're trusting these details would just "work out -The housing density and floor plan ratio greatly exceed the current zoning allowances - Traffic will come through the Cornelia neighborhood, which is concerning given the proximity of Cornelia Elementary School - Affordable Housing is being used as a buzz -word to get this project approved. At the planning commission meeting, the 32 affordable housing units were the only reason the developer could give for.�vhy the project so greatly exceeds code. I am in support of affordable housing, where it makes sense. Given the huge variances needed for height and density, this is not the right project for this sight. I ask you, for the sake of these 32 units, will you really sacrifice the integrity of the South Cornelia neighborhood were hundreds of residents will be impacted? I was concerned by a statement from a council member to the development team at the initial sketch review in July, that by "asking for the moon, we can find a middle ground on some of the comprehensive plan violations. I strongly disagree. The City of Edina went through a very thorough planning process to create a comprehensive plan for the city. This plan was well thought through and there are good reasons for the regulations and policies in this plan. It was created:to ensure a consistent approach and vision for what the city of Edina will become. Any variations or allowances from the comprehensive plan should be very far and few between and the implications to violating the plan should be seriously considered. Otherwise, the time we spent creating the comprehensive plan was a waste. As have sat through various council and planning commission meetings,I noted the thoroughness with which the council dissected the plans for different development proposals: duplexes, setbacks on houses, etc. Much thought was given to the character of the neighborhood and the community. I find it disappointing that the city is not looking at the 7200 France proposal through a similar set of lenses and asking, does this project fit within the residential west side of France Avenue? The answer is a resounding "no ". I would also remind you that the planning commission voted this proposal down 8 -0 at the last planning commission meeting, yet the developer still has the audacity to present the same proposal to the city council without taking any heed to the planning commission's or neighborhood's feedback. As a resident, I find this both insulting and frustrating. It is time, that we as a city, stop sitting in the passenger seat with what developers are throwing at us, and start demanding that the developers come up with proposals that come within the comprehensive plan and fit within the neighborhood. This proposal does neither. Julie Chamberlain 7004 Bristol Boulevard j Jackie H000enakker From: Fritz & Peggy <fritzpeggy @msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:31 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Rezoning at 72nd and France We strongly believe that the existing Comp Plan (height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of retail) at corner of 72nd and France is valid and should remain. The higher volume and speed of traffic cutting through the Cornelia school area has already been on the rise to avoid the 70th and France intersection to go south on France. The safety of pedestrians, students, and neighborhood is priority. Consideration of protecting property value and residential character is also critical.. The residential flavor of this wonderful area is threatened by rezoning to retail, restaurant,and high density building in addition to the development already occurring east side of France. How much more will 70th ( and the adjacent residential streets) be "sacrificed" to accommodate increased traffic from highway 100 to France? The current proposal is not appropriate for this site and the surrounding neighborhood. The zoning parameters in place should remain. Respectfully, Margaret Erickson 7008 Bristol Blvd. 952 - 240 -3414 1 Jackie HooQenakker From: Donna Wolfson <donnawolfson @hotmaiLcom> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:29 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, Please, forward the following to Cary Teague, the Mayor, and the City Council. We understand the city's dual concerns about attracting millenials and meeting our legal and moral obligation to provide affordable housing for all who wish to reside within our city. However, we.,urge the council to follow our;existiing Comprehensive Plan. Minnetonka's recent decision ,to keep building heights within its current Planrfor the Ridged ale: area is a model of thoughtfulness. Please follow the current zoning requirements for this property which prohibit restaurant use. That kind of activity should remain on the east side of France. The only current west side restaurant is Perkins - which is in Bloomington. Also, please follow the City's Comprehensive Plan for height, living density, and floor area ratio on this site. Ideally, the city would first complete a detailed plan for the entire stretch of west France from 72nd to the Bloomington border before considering any changes. Thank.you for your consideration. Donna & Richard Wolfson 4509 Dunham Drive Edina 1 Jackie Hoocienakker rom: Helen <helen4433 @msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 20141:58 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Zoning Changes for 7200 France Please advise Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the Mayor and all members of the City Council that I feel the current proposal is too dense for this site. Please encourage /insist -the City to stay with their Maser Comprehensive Plan. Respectfully yours, Helen D. Olsen 1 ' Jackie Hooaenakker From: Robert Leslie <quokka.leslie @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:07 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed rezoning at 7200 France Ave. Please pass to council members and involved staff. Please do not change the current zoning. France is already becoming a packed corridor and will only get much worse as the professional buildings from 72nd to the South are rebuilt to the limit of the current zoning. Thanks for your consideration of this request. Robert H. Leslie 7309 Glouchester Drive, Edina,, Minnesota 55435 Pl. 952 893 1868. E. Quokka.Leslie@pmail.com 1 Jackie Hoogenakker from: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, Jeff Jonswold <jjonswold @btodev.com> Monday, December 01, 201411:05 AM Jackie Hoogenakker 72nd & France Redevelopment Proposal We 'are writing to strongly encourage the Edina City Council to maintain the integrity of the..City's Master Plan as it relates to the proposed redevelopment at the southeast cornerof France Avenue and 72 Street. It seems to us that Council members, in the past, have been very quick to verbalize how proud they are of`the process that was undertaken to develop a City wide Master Plan. Yet, it seems that way too often, when they are pressed to consider a 'development that is outside the parameters of the Master Plan they overlook the concerns of the citizens and defer to the wishes of the developer. If the Master Plan was-developed to foster and promote what is the best for the -'overall good of the City than why do they allow developers to push beyond the established limits of the Master Plan? We understand that the existing improvements on the site in question are an underdevelopment and that a higher and better use could, and should, be made of this site:; This being said, however, why does this site need to be developed beyond the currently established limits? If the developer needs expanded capacity and other concessions to justify their investment it is not the City's responsibility to amend their Master Plan to accommodate the developer. The Master Plan has been in place and the developer knew the limitations of the Master Plan before making their own decisions. If retail aO"restaurants and expanded capacity are truly a need in Edina then these should be undertaken on the east side if France where the zoning is more appropriate, not at one of the only ingress and egress points for. a major residential ;ommunity. It also seems to us that the City is showing a willingness to be coerced into modifying its' Master Plan in exchange for a commitment by a developer to build affordable housing. We understand the need, and the pressure, for the City;to provide for additional affordable housing in Edina. We certainly do not oppose affordable housing in Edina but is the price of some additional affordable housing units worth all the other concessions that are being asked.for by this developer? Recognizing the need for additional affordable housing in Edina, why doesn't the Council spend the time and effort to prepare an "Affordable Housing Master Plan" that addresses this need, along with the costs and benefits of establishing and meeting this need in the City? Allowing developers to offer affordable housing in exchange for' concessions from the City in other areas is a policy that is fraught with problems. If affordable housing is a priority of the City then address it as such and don't do it in a piece meal manner. In conclusion, we are opposed to modifying the current Master Plan for a new development at the southeast corner of France Avenue and 72A Street. Please forward this to members of Mr. Teague, the Mayor and City Council. Jeff & Joan Jonswold 7320 Cornelia Drive Jackie Hoogenakker From: John Kuntz <kuntz @usfamily.net> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201411:13 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Master Comprehensive Plan To Whom It May Concern, I have lived in Edina since 1941, a span of 73 years. I have seen my community grow from an agricultural area into a thriving metropolitan suburb, recognized nationally in so many ways. A Master Comprehensive Plan has been at the heart of this growth. Now, however, a plan has been foisted to ignore our Comprehensive Plan and build a massive retail conglomerate at 72nd St. and France Ave. In my opinion this change to the Plan would be a huge error, decrying what Edina has stood for in the past years. It would open our community, forever, to builders, dreamers, and money makers. We have, already, our necessary share of retail. We have grown enough! Sincerely, John and Carol Kuntz 4520 Hibiscus Ave. Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sent: To: Subject: December 1, 2014 . plmiller @comcast.net Monday, December 01, 201411:37 AM Jackie Hoogenakker Proposed zoning changes for 7200 France Ave. To: Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the Edina Mayor, and all the Edina City. Council Members This a mail is to express our views: on the proposed zoning changes for 7200 France Ave. We encourage /insist the'City stay.with their Master Comprehensive Plan and not allow the five story proposal, retail and restaurants. We believe the density is already getting too much for the area, especially the south dale area, and across the 7200 France area where Beyerly's grocery store, apts. etc. are: being developed. The traffic is getting heavier, more I congested and harder for people to get around now so we certainly don't need additional congestion, which is what a higher building, retail and restaurants if granted would bring in. We live west of this area a few blocks and already are., finding France Ave. harder to access and more traffic congestion. We agree with both the City Staff and the Planning Commission who have recommended that this proposal be denied. Thank you. Respectfully yours, 'aul and Georgia Miller /2xx Glouchester Ave. S. i Jackie, Hoogenakker. From: Robert Kellermeier <rkellermeier @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201411:52 AM, To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Janice Kellermeier. Subject: 7200 France Avenue Project Attachments: city of edina 120114.pdf Ms. Hoogenakker: Please forward attached letter to the Mayor, City Council. Members and Cary Teague. Thank you. Robert A. Kellermeier Attorney at Law. Kellerme'ierLaw, P.A. 3800.American =Blvd. W.. Northland Plaza Suite 1500 . Bloomington, MN 55431 Phone: 952 =820 -1155 Fax: 952- 921 -5801 IMPORTANT: This transmission from the law firm of Kellermeier Law, P.A. ( "Kellermeier Law ") may contain information which is privileged, confidential and protected by the attorney- client or attorney work product privileges. Any content including documents, attachments, links or other writings are for the sole use of the intended recipient, and other. use is prohibited without express written approval by Kellermeier Law. If you are not the addressee, or if you have received this transmission in error, note that any use of this information, including but not limited to disclosure, copying, reading, distribution, dissemination, transmittal, or re- transmittal is prohibited, and maybe a violation of law under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510 - 2521. Please destroy the information and notify Kellermeier Law immediately at.our telephone number (952) 820 - 1155. 1 , Jackie Hoogenakker rom: Lori Prebil <bprebil@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201411:52 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed development of 7200 France Avenue Please forward this email to. all members of the City Council, Cary Teague, the Community Development Director and the Mayor. Thank you so much. Dear City Council members, We reside near Cornelia Elementary school and are opposed to the proposed zoning changes and the developer's plans for 7200 France Avenue for numerous reasons. You are aware of many of the problems this development will cause and the negative impact it will have on the area and future development of the west side of France Avenue from 72nd st to 494. It has been suggested by a couple residents who have professional expertise in this kind of city planning that Edina hire a firm to evaluate the needs of the city and propose a plan for the west side of France. That would be a very prudent first step in order to avoid repeating this problem as other properties in that area go on the market. Ine thing that has been only mentioned briefly is the impact on Cornelia elementary school and the residents. gnat it serves. If the proposed plan is approved there will be many children that would need access to elementary services. Changing boundaries has been brought up as a possible solution. This would not impact- the people currently interested, in this development, but the families residing near the northern and western boundaries: of Cornelia's,district. They are also going to be upset. at changing to different-elementary schools. At the least, this issue should be discussed seriously with staff from Edina schools and the facilities and transportation departments for _the schools: The city has done a very good job making pedestrian- friendly changes in the France area and to make this part of Edina updated and well- designed. If you drive south on France Avenue and think about what makes that area inviting and unique, one of the most striking attributes is that you can see the sky and there is an open feeling because the buildings are low or set way back on a large piece of property with ample open space around the building. We would hate to see that aspect of Edina altered. (That has already happened in areas around Southdale). We live near a lot of commercial property and have no complaints at this point. But, the current Comp Plan was developed for a reason and should be followed. The Planning Commission and the city planners are elected and hired for a reason. They have wisely opposed this development and it would make no sense to ignore their wise input regarding this matter. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely `,ori and Bill Prebil Jackie Hoogenakker From: David J Melroe <dmelroe @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201411:58 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker. Subject: 7200 France proposal Asa local resident in the Cornelia district, on 7120 West Shore Drive, I strongly believe that the City, of Edina should not grant the builders an exemption that goes against the long term existing. Master Plan. The area is already getting too dense with the, new Condos being built across the France Ave at Byerlys. The intersection already willbe too busy with traffic at 72nd and France, without adding more high rise living units. Thanks David J Melroe 1120 West Shore Drive Edina Mn Jackie Hooaenakker rom: Jack-Blum <JBlum @acpsta.com >. Sent: Monday, December 01, 201411:59. AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Zoning changes for 7200 France Ave Jackie, Please pass my comments below along to Cart Teague,the Mayor and City Council members. All, I totally agree with staff and the planning commission that the corner of 72 "d & France should be developed with the existing Master Comprehensive Plan in terms of height,living density and floor area, ratio. Respectfully yours, Jack Blum 4421 Gilford Dr Edina MN 55435 952- 927 -8938 i Jackie Hoogenakker From: Mark Chamberlain <beetlebug00 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201412:10 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Ave Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, Please share this email with the Mayor and member of the City Council. It is with extreme frustration that I even need to send this email, and give up an evening with my family tomorrow night to attend the City Council meeting regarding the 7200 France proposal by Boisclair Corporation. We supposedly have a Master Comprehensive Plan for Edina, but unfortunately, we have a City Council that pays it little heed. You have recently approved a 6 story apartment building on York Avenue where the Comprehensive Plan limits were 4; you have recently approved a 39 unit rental building in an area zoned as Regional Medical, for which you are now being sued and will ultimately cost us taxpayers to pay to defend your decision; and you didn't have the courage to tell Boisclair Corporation back in July when they came to you with their "Sketch Plan" that we have a Comprehensive Plan that sets limits as to what and how much can be developed at 7200 France. So now Boisclair is coming back to you with a revised plan that still vastly exceeds the limits as outlined in our Comprehensive Plan, a plan which your, and our, City Staff has recommended be denied, and your advisory board, the Planning Commission, has voted 8 -0 to deny approval. So this should not be a difficult decision for you tomorrow night when you hear Boisclair's proposal. No to retail and restaurants, no to buildings over 4 stories, no to residential density that exceed 30 living units per acre, and no to buildings that exceed the .5 floor area ratio requirements. Sincerely, Mark Chamberlain 7004 Bristol Boulevard Jackie Hoogenakker crom: Melody Sledz <melodysledz@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201412:12 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 72nd and France development Those of us living in the Cornelia neighborhood would like to be assured that the Edina City Council will follow - and stay in compliance with - the existing Planning Commission recommendations and any further longterm.safety plans concerning the 72nd/ France corner abutting our residential. neighborhoods. The Planning Commission recommendations support neighborhood school children and adult traffic safety and are clearly in the best interests and broad professional perspective of residents and city - versus the special interests of a single, apparently, powerful developer. This should not be a difficult call nor require lengthy surveys. Full analysis has already been given to this - we would like to be assured that our elected representatives will be good stewards.in abiding by it. Please do not continue following backwards planning - such as closing down an important little neighborhood golf course that could have been marketed SO much more successfully - and THEN send surveys to the same spurned -. opinion residents regarding how the area ,should be developed( ?). Thank you for your attention. Please forward these full - length views to Cary Teague, the mayor, and city council members. Melody and Lad Sledz From: Ginny McCarthy <famncl @aol.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 201410:07 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Rezoning 7200 France We strongly urge the Council to follow the Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that the proposed reasoning of 7200 France be denied. This site should only be redeveloped in compliance with the existing master plan. The proximity to `Cornelia Elementary school, together with the increased traffic and the very real potential for cut - through traffic,' poses safety risk for our children. Quality of life and safety in this neighborhood has already deteriorated in the 25 years we have lived here, primarily due to heavy traffic.on 70th street. It should also be noted that office workers in the existing building often cut through the neighborhood -down 72nd to Cornelia Avenue to 70th, so the potential for increased cut - through traffic is VERY REAL. Please stay with the Master Comprehensive Plan. Thank you, Ginny and Frank McCarthy Please forward these comments to the Mayor, the City Council members, and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. Sent from my iPad 1 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Jane Melroe <jmbrumel @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December Ol; 201410:04 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed zoning changes for 7200 France Avenue Jackie Hoogenakker, Please forward comments to the Mayor and all members of the City Council: I am opposed to the rezoning changes requested by the developer's at the 7200 France site since they are in excess of the City's Comprehensive Plan in terms of height, living density and floor area ratio. The existing Comprehensive Plan with the 4 story height limit, FAR requirements and prohibition of retail and restaurants on the parcel at the corner of 72nd and France Avenue is and will continue to be valid. Please deny this rezoning request as recommended by the Staff and Planning Commission. Jane Melroe 952 - 926 -9736 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Bob Rofidal <brofidal@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 26,,2014 1:34 PM To; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200-France Hi Jackie. We have a comp plan. Let us stay within the plan and current zoning.. It is too big. It will be more traffic on Cornelia Drive past our school. Bob Rofidal 1 Jackie Hoogenakker prom: Chris Rofidal < crofidal @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 4:12 PM Subject: Opposition to 7200 France Please forward to Edina City Council.... Thank you! Dear Edina City Council- Just a brief note.in opposition of the 7200 France project as is currently being proposed. Clearly the Comprehensive Plan is being violated which is the main issue. That'said, my issue is regarding the process of this application as it now sits with you. Please considerthat both the City Planners and the Planning Commissiomgr,e NOT recommending this application. How many timeshave,we heard people complaining when they feel City Staff is ramming something through? How many times do you hear complaints that the Planning Commission did not listen to the residents at the pubic hearing? Well, guess what ... not this time. This time both your planning professionals and appointed Commission have said TO DENSE for the West side of France. Please do the right thing by asking the developers to go back to the drawing board on this one. I grew up within a 9 iron of that site and the area is maxed out. As an aside, please ask tough questions about drainage and water runoff. I can tell you first hand that after a series of hard rainfalls, I have swam in that parking lot as a kid. Not the smartest thing-I ,have ever done :) Good luck and thank you for your service to our Community. Thanks also to the City Staff who have done their due diligence on this one... Chris Chris Rofidal 612 963 2887 cell 952 285 4459 work crofidal@comcast.net http: //www.linkedin.com /in /crofidal 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sue Rofidal <suerofida12 @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 9:05 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 piece of property As a 41 year resident of the area very close to the proposed site of the huge apartment complex, I am asking the city council to abide by the recommendation of the "staff "" and planning commission and not allow the project to exceed the comprehensive plan guidelines. If you do, why do we even have these other groups? This far exceeds what is right for our community. Our quadrant has been hit very hard by the new development approved by these groups. I realize this is a more commercial area, but it is still our homes and neighborhood. Please do not do this to us... there are other areas in Edina that could also house these proposals. Please forward this to all City Council members and Cary Teague.. Respectfully, Sue Rofidal 7125 Bristol Boulevard 1 Jackie Hoogenakker irom: Ashley Eastman <ashley- larson @bethel.edu> Sent: Friday, November 28, 201410:08 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Re: 7200 France Ave Good morning Jackie, I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving with your loved ones. I am writing to you again in regards to the project at 7200 France Ave. We strongly believe that the existing Comp Plan with its 4 story height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of retail on the parcel at the corner of 72nd and France is and will continue to be valid. We decry the fact that developers feel like they can extort inappropriate concessions from the city. We would like to see both the Commission and the Council tell this and any other developer that this particular site MUST BE REDEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING MASTER PLAN. The Planning Commission recently voted against the proposed plan 8 -0 and we strongly encourage the city council to backup the decision of the individuals on the planning commission. It is important that the city council knows that the Planning Commission and the individuals at City Hall are against the proposed project. We urge City Council to listen to them and the residents of the Cornelia neighborhood and deny this project. Additionally we don't think it is fair that the majority of the "affordable housing" happens to be in one area of the city. This doesn't do anybody any good. If Edina is "all in favor" of affordable housing then we would like to see it scattered throughout the city and not just near the Southdale /Cornelia area. The traffic.increases for Cornelia Elementary students and the young children that live in the Cornelia neighborhood are of extreme concern to our family. We live on Cornelia Drive and have two young children. We already have, a high amount of traffic on our street and we don't want to see it irther increase due to a massive apartment complex around the corner. The amount of "cut- through" traffic from Highway 00 to France (via Cornelia Drive or other accessible residential streets) needs to be examined /considered for our the homeowners and the safety of the children /students in our neighborhood. There is ample history to support this position from a professional perspective as to what is in the best interest of your and our city - neighborhood value protection, traffic issues on both 72nd and France, safety of school children, etc. There is also a track record given previous meeting minutes as the same issues were present in the precedent setting decision with regard to the Sunrise Assisted Living Project. This is not a difficult call nor does it require lengthy analysis. We ask that you will do the right thing and voice for all of us the City's opinion that on this particular site the redevelopment requirements are set. Please forward this email to the mayor, members of the planning commission and the city council. Thank you very much for giving us a voice. Sincerely, Ashley Eastman 7117 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 J , Jackie Hoogenakker From: Steve Eastman <eric- eastman @bethel.edu> Sent' Friday, November 28,,2014 10:24 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Hi Jackie, I hope you had a -great Thanksgiving! I'm sure you're getting a bunch of emails so I appreciate you letting everyone voice their opinion. I agree with the majority of the residents of Edina that the proposed project should be kept within the current city - guidelines. I would hope that the city council would vote:down this proposal just as the planning commission did. We have two young kids and currently enjoy the Cornelia neighborhood. Obviously, adding a massive apartment complex increases traffic through residential streets and causes concern for the safety of our children. I would recommend closing off (dead end) 72nd Street so there can't be any added traffic to the residential .streets and all traffic would be directed to France. The proposed builder cited a "study" at the first city council meeting claiming that France Avenue can handle more traffic .(which is also kind of crazy) so I would ask that if anything is passed that the traffic must go through France Avenue. The other . concerning issue with this proposal is the "affor'dable housing" aspect of the project. That .is also of concern to our family. We pay a premium to live in Edina and adding subsidized housing in our neighborhood only hurts the value of our homes and adds concerns for our family. All of the congestion/subsidized housing is being concentrated in the Cornelia/Southdale area and I hope that this won't continue. I'm sure this is happening because "affordable housing" wouldn't fly in most areas of Edina'and I sure hope it doesn't continue here. I'm not sure if the City, 6o is getting pressure from the Met council to provide affordable housing but that has never' been a big part of Edina. Let's continue to. keep Edina a unique and desirable place, to live! I ask that you please pass this email along to the city council, mayor and planning commission. Thank you very much for your time and have a great rest of the weekend, Steve Eastman 7117 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hoogenakker 'From: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> ..Sent: Friday, November 28, 201410:28 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Opposition to Proposed Project at 7200 France Avenue Attachments: Council Letter Nov 28, 14.docx Please forward my attached bullet points to the Mayor and members of the City Council. Thank you, Harvey Turner Resident: 7315 Glouchester Dr. 1� Jackie Hoogenakker From: glen whitesell <dgwhitesell @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 28, 201411:25 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Jackie Has Hennepin County Engineering made their final decision on the curb cuts off of France Ave. (County Rd.17), at 7200 France? Thanks Glen Whitesell 7116 Heatherton Trail Jackie Hoogenakker From: Rozanne Andersen <Rozanne .Andersen @OntarioSystems.com> Sent: Friday, November 28, 20141:16 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker; Mail @EdinaMN.gov.; joseph.paimersheim @ecm- inc.com; lisa.kaczke @ecm - inc.com; mark.weber @ecm - inc.com Cc: beetlebug00 @gmail.com; halljan22 @gmail.com; cathylc @mac.com; Collin Nelson; kanelson09 @gmail.com; smandersen20ll @gmail.com Subject: PLEASE SHARE WITH COUNCIL - VOTE NO RE: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 7200 FRANCE AVE Members of the Edina City Council, My husband and I have lived in our home on Bristol Circle [cul -de -sac adjacent to proposed development] for almost 21 years. We raised our family in this home and were thrilled when in March of 2014 our daughter and son in law bought their family home on Hibiscus [just blocks from the proposed development] so they too would and could enjoy raising their children, Livy age three and Jack 18 months, in this quiet, close knit, Cornelia neighborhood. We vehemently oppose your approval of the proposed development of 7200 France Ave as presented by Boisclair for four reasons. 1. STOP USE OF 72nd AS A CUT THROUGH /TRAFFIC SAFETY- I recognize my concerns about the proposed development and your apparent proclivity to disregard the Comprehensive Plan are in large part driven by my concern for my family's and my friends' health, safety and well- being; but I want you to know I am equally concerned about the afety of the children who attend Cornelia Elementary. I know first -hand how people use Cornelia Drive [South of 70th] as a speedy cut through to France Avenue as they make their way during morning and evening rush hour to and from 494. The use of Cornelia Drive and West Shore Drive for this purpose along with the traffic congestion caused by the Cremation Society when services are in progress makes TRAFFIC SAFETY one of the first reasons you should site for rejecting the development as presented by Boisclair. 2. STOP THE INCREASED STRESS ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE - Increasing the density of the housing beyond what is permitted in the Comprehensive Plan is simply irresponsible and short sighted. Unless and until the Comprehensive Plan is modified to include a fully articulated plan for the development of France Avenue from its northern most border in Edina to its southern most border at Highway 494 and a Traffic Study and Environmental Impact Study are completed, the city council should refuse to approve any land use proposal that deviates from the Comprehensive Plan — period. Any action contrary to such an approach is irresponsible, extremely short sighted and precisely the reason cities such as Brainerd and St. Cloud Minnesota are visually and practically offensive. 3. REMEMBER WHY WE HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION — It is my understanding our City Manager and perhaps more importantly our Planning Commission have unanimously voted against the development as presented by Boisclair. Does their collective opinion only matter when it is convenient or politically beneficial to the City Council? 4. CLARIFY YOUR VISION /CHAMPS - ELYSEES OR AD HOC DEVELOPMENT? — Quite frankly I travel a lot for my job. I see how cities across the U.S. have grown to embrace socioeconomic, cultural and business needs in ways that actually beautify a locale. But these successes do not happen by way of ad hoc development. They happen because the city planners and councils have a vision that will address today's urban needs and the needs of the people for many'years, if not generations, to come. Should France Avenue become our Champs Elysees or a thoroughfare through a quaint, quite esidential village? I don't know, but as my elected officials, I think you should. Vote no with regard to the proposed Boisclair development and yes to the creation of a long range plan that incorporates all the comments and information you are gleaning from those "ask the residents" meetings you are holding and the surveys you have sent to the residents. You know the expression, "don't be surprised if you don't get to where you want to be if you don't have a plan." PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS[ Sincerely, Rozanne and Steve Andersen 7204 Bristol Circle Edina, MN Rozanne M. Andersen. Esq. Ontario Systems I Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer t 952.221,6267 1 f 765 - 751 -7498 1150 West Kilgore ONTARIO Avenue I Muncie, IN 47305 -1588 s.vsTfN5 www.OntarioSystems.com 1 800.283.3227 Disclaimer: This information contained in this email and any attachments or links associated with this email is not intended as legal advice and may not be used as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort has been made to assure this information is up -to -date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel. The author(s) and Ontario Systems assume no liability for typographical or other errors contained in the email or any attachments or links associated with this email or for changes in the law affecting anything discussed herein. Attention: This message and all attachments are private and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message immediately. Jackie Hoogenakker :•rom: John C. Thomas <jct91544 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2Q14 8:39 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: France Ave/ Boisclair Development This note is in opposition to the Boisclair Development of the property on' France Avenue. The Edina Master Comprehensive Plan was adopted to make sure that future developments had, among other items, a semblance of architectural integrity, consistency and uniformity.There is no reason to disregard that plan because a.developer thinks he has a better idea. The Master Plan was passed to assure consistency in retail and other commercial development. I have heard no reason why it should be disregarded at this time.What is the point of adopting a Master Plan which can so casually be disregarded by the current City Council. The City Staff and Planning Commission have deemed the proposal of the developer to not be in compliance with the Master Plan. The. recommendations of the staff should be respected and enforced. To do otherwise in the absence of demonstrable evidence in support of proposal by the developer is to invite litigation and investigation of why the divergence is necessary over the recommendations of the City staff. Please forward this to Mr Cary Teague Community Development Director for the meeting scheduled for December 2. ohn C. Thomas 7206 Bristol Circle Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hooaenakker From: John Carlson <jwc4433 @yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30,2014 11:55 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Zoning Changes for 7200 France Forward to Cary Teague, Community Development Director. We live at 4433 Ellsworth Drive. At this point, we oppose rezoning the site. The size of the proposed building, its density, related traffic, and retail segments threaten the single family nature of the adjoining neighborhoods. Slowly but.continualy, the developments around France in the vacinity of 72nd are detracting from the residential, These neighborhoods contain young families and children who do not need retail, restaurants; and.tall buildings.in their back yards. We believe the site, if it is to be redeveloped, should be in accordance with the existing Master Comprehensive Plan. Thank you for considering this request. John W. Carlson Edina, MN . 1 Jackie Hoogenakker .Torn: Karen Hill <kkhillmn @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 20141:32 PM ,To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Zoning Changes I will not be able to attend the meeting scheduled for 2 December as I am providing care for my neighbor who has surgery that day. Thus I ask that you pass on my thoughts and concerns to Cary Teague, the Mayor, and ALL the members of the City Council. I am extremely concerned about putting the =number of people and buildings requested into the. designated area. I live at the end of Cornelia Drive and realize how difficult it will be for us to go out to France with the increased population in the area. I would have to drive all the way to hwy 100 to get onto .the road and run errands. (It would definitely take my shopping away from Edina stores which would be unfortunate as I like to shop local whenever possible.) In addition although I have no children I recognize the increased safety problem for children who walk around the neighborhood on roads verses sidewalks (which is fine if we remain a residential neighborhood) as evefyone (even all those new residents) will be looking for short cuts out to major roads. All anyone needs to do to understand the problems is to live backing up on the Parklawn complexes. When you research rules & regulations applying to multi complex buildings verses residential housing, it soon becomes obvious that there are few solutions to problems experienced by residents who experience problems with enters. All we need to do is have even more crowding of people into an area that will with time cause problems for the community overall simply due to overcrowding. We just finished more crowding on the other side of France. Need we increase the crowding on this side of France also? As a residential owner, I think not. I hope the City will not change rules at the whims of developers. Remember that developer will not be living in the area that has the "pleasure of getting the problems and does not reap the benefits. We do not need to give up neighborhood value protections such as traffic and safety of the children. In addition at a time when our property value is just working its way back from our nation's problems, it would be very frustrating to have the value go down again. Karen K. Hill 7332 Cornelia Drive Jackie Hoogenakker From: Adelle Hansen <adelleaha @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:06 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed zoning changes for 7200 France To: City Council, I am deeply disappointed in the City Council's insistenc.eon swaying from th'e comprehensive plan in terms of height living density and floor area ratio on the:proposed building site at 7206 France. I also am concerned that the city is rejecting the Planning Commission's and the city staff's recommendations to deny the. proposal and to change the comp plan and allow for this development.. What concerns me is that the city is establishing.a precedent in not following the existing comp plan without the neighborhood involvement. The proposed development would add additional traffic on 72nd street, which is bordering the block where my family lives. This additional residential traffic would put the neighborhood children who are walking or getting on the bus to Cornelia neighborhood school in an unsafe environment. The additional retail that this development would have would further endanger foot traffic in our neighborhood, what with food trucks bringing supplies to any restaurants that are built at the development. The proposed development is too dense for this residential area. Please listen to the neighborhood input on this subject and deny the proposal from the developers. I do not oppose development on the site, but any new development should fall within the restrictions of the current Master Comprensive Plan. Respectfully, Adelle Hansen Attorney At Law 7108 Heatherton Trail Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackie Hooaenakker From: stdennis @gustavus.edu Sent:. Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:55 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Proposal Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, Please forward our comments to Mr. Teague, Mr. Hovland and all the members of the Edina City Council prior to the meeting this Tuesday. The purpose of this email is to voice our serious concerns regarding a building proposal for the 7200 France property in our neighborhood. We strongly believe that the existing Comprehensive Plan with its 4 story height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of retail on the parcel of land is. and will continue to be valid. We would like to see the Council follow Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that this proposal be denied, and make it clear that this particular site must be redeveloped in compliance with the existing Comprehensive, Plan. We ask that you will do the right thing_ and voice for all of us the City's opinion that on this particular site the redevelopment requirements are set and must be followed. Thank you. With thanks for your service, Grady & Angie St.' Dennis 7005 Bristol Blvd Edina, MN 55435 Rev. Grady St. Dennis'92 College Chaplain /Director for Church Relations 507 - 933 -7661 1 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Mary Dunn <dunnbrown @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 3:02 PM To: _ Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Jackie Hoogenakker Administrative Assistant Dear Ms. Hoogenakker: As a citizen living just off 72nd Street on Bristol Circle (just behind the 7200 France office building) I sincerely hope that the current requirements of the existing Master Comprehensive Plan for that land be respected and followed. Development`at that corner should take'into account the current increase in density and traffic which businesses and residents contendat present. Thank you in advance for your consideration and 'firm refusal to grant variances to the proposed development plans. Please forward my a -letter to Cary Teague, Community Development Director, our Mayor and all members of the Edina City Council. Sincerely, Mary Dunn Brown 1 Jackie Hooaenakker from: RogerToyGuy @aol.com Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 3:24 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Zoning Changes For 7200'France Ave. Sol. Please Forward This E -mail to: Cary Teague We are writing this e-mail in Protest to the proposed Zoning changes at 7200 France Ave.So. We have lived at 7129 Cornelia Drive for 48 years and have seen the Traffic on'Cornelia Drive increase at least 20fold. Commuters use 70th, Cornelia Dr. & 72nd to avoid the traffic signal at 70th & France Ave:, and the Traffic Circle at 70th & ValleyView Rd, and the traffic signal at Hazelton Rd. Also the cars are very often going over the Speed Limit on Cornelia Dr. endangering the Children going to and from the School and Playground. This proposed Development will only further aggravate this situation ... a Very Poor Idea M! Pat & Roger Harmon 7129 Cornelia Drive Tel: 952 -926 -9500 RogerToyGux(cD_aol.com 0 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: maureen glover <maureenlglover @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 4:39 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Zoning changes for 7200 France Again I would like to express our opposition to making zoning changes to 7200 France. I live 5 blocks west on Claremore Drive which is the same as 72nd St. This is a residential neighborhood that is already surrounded by numerous freeways, businesses and large multiple dwelling complexes. It is important to us to maintain the quality and character of the immediate neighborhood with predominantly single family homes. We have lived here for 20 years. We and many of our neighbors enjoy gardening and spending time in our yards. We would not appreciate the increase in traffic that this complex would bring to our immediate neighborhood. Why do we have zoning laws if each time a property owner wants to develop property they can expect exceptions to be made to meet their needs rather than that of the homeowners who actually live here? Please deny this proposal and support your constituents and the people you represent. Please stand by the existing Master Comprehensive Plan so that further development of the property in our neighborhood is redeveloped in compliance with this plan. There is an apartment building just on the other side of Sunrise Assisted Living. It is built to scale to compliment the residential setting it is located in. It is a matter pf aesthetics and livability of our neighborhood. Your consideration is appreciated. Maureen and Joe Glover 4440 Claremore Dr. Edina. MN 55435 Jackie Hoogenakker Trom: gchrich @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 4:57 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fwd: 72nd Project From: gchrich �comcast.net To: gchrich comcast.net Sent: Sunday, November. 30, 2014 4:55:21 PM Subject: 72nd Project Our email frankly represents a large number of neighbors in our 72nd area who just wont take time to email you because they feel "it is, worthless to try to deal with city hall and the good Ole boys club" to developers. We wish they would have decided to take a few minutes to actually put those thoughts to the Mayor and those on'the development team. We will make this brief. PLEASE DIRECT to Cary Teague to be read and considered. Thank you. We felt the SUNRISE developers did their best to care about our neighborhood and have been good neighbors 'lease do the right thing by putting the taxpayers who have paid the_ price to raise our families here tand they also would wish to raise their families here ... }AHEAD .of the profit of outside developers who approach you.The original and true plan for Edina MUST remain TRUE to prohibit growth plans that clearly do not comply. This is a serious issue The greed of those who wish to just use Edina for their personal profit is against our neighbors and families, this must not continue. Please,stop.:this type of thing from negatively changing the our safe and trusted environment. PLE ASE 'STOP allowing developers to even think Edina-will allow terms of structures that plan to breakthrough EDINA's EXISTING MASTER PLAN for development. This should never have sneaked through this far. We must trust our officials to protect our safety from overcrowding our neighborhood and adding to traffic and safety,..... not to mention the property values of our beautiful residential property. We can not be at the December 2nd meeting due to previously required commitment in our schedule. Please consider this email our presence via written word. Gregory and Carole Richardson and family 7200 Heatherton Circle Edina, Mn 612- 590 -5578 I ch rich Q-comcast. net Jackie Hoogenakker From: Evans & Zelubowski <zevans4 @msn.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 5:34 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, We are writing about the proposal at 7200 France. Please forward this letter to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the mayor and all members of the City Council prior to Tuesday's meeting. We are long term residents of the Cornelia neighborhood. We are strongly against the current proposal for multiple reasons including traffic and safety. We strongly feel the property needs to be redeveloped within the guidelines of the current Comprehensive Plan. We feel the current building proposal is too high, too dense and allows for things that current zoning does not. Please adhere to the existing comprehensive plan. The individuals that the City Council appointed to the Planning Commission and the professionals at City Hall voted eight to zero against supporting the current proposal. Please follow their recommendations. Sincerely, Patricia Evans Paul Zelubowski 7111 Heatherton Trail Jackie Hoogenakker Fro m: (5ary Hudson <ghudson4034 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 5:51 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Avenue rezoning request -- 12/2/14 City Council Meeting Jackie, please forward my comments to Cary Teague and all members of the City Council. Thank you. TO: Major and City Council Members My comments will be brief as I have just been dismissed from Fairview Hospital Cardiac Care Unit. However, despite brevity, my views are very strong. My hospitalization will also prevent my presence at the City Council Meeting, but I shall be with those in attendance in spirit. I am Gary A. Hudson, 4512 Belvidere Lane, Edina, MN 55434 -4023. (9527929 - 0634) 6udson4034 ,gmail.com Please vote "no" on the rezoning request for 7200 France Avenue. Follow the views of City Staff and the Planning Commission. Do not, still another time, give way to "profiteering developers, and depart from the Master Comprehensive Plan. I use 72nd street many times each week to reach my home on Belvidere Lane. I object to the additional traffic on 72nd and also France Avenue that this massive development would produce. The huge project at the former Wickes site will not onlybaye residents, but retail shops on ground level. Restaurant(s), too. The three units to be built as part ,of the $yerleys development will include ground level retail as well'as residents. At Southdale, three structures will add more residents. The resulting additional traffic in this area is yet to be experienced. With so much additional retail, Edina has exceeded reasonable density. We do not need all the additional retail with minimum wage jobs that 7200 France is proposing. The economy cannot_ support so much additional retail in the form of small shops. The additional traffic is beyond comprehension. As mentioned, Edina's density has already been far exceeded. Do not make it worse. Instead enforce the Edina Master Comprehensive Plan. We do not need a structure of that height infringing on Edina neighborhoods. We do not need the additional living density) and floor area. Tell this and other developers that the site must be redeveloped in compliance with the existing master plan. It is too bad the developer got the cart ahead of the horse and purchased the property with their investment hopes clouding their reason. Please uphold the Master Comprehensive Plan and quickly vote NO regarding this request. As an additional note,,the City Council, like Edina Residents, need to. understand the difference between Need vs. Want. My property tax information shows I have an increase of $800.00 for next year. I moved nere in 2001 , My property taxes have increased $1,500.Op in those years. This is not sustainable for Edina Residence. Let's put a brake on the spending and tax increases. Thank you. 0 2 Jackie Hoo enakker From: Carol <carol.naae @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:07 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Information for the City Council Meeting Attention Jackie Hoogenakker, Please forward our comments to Cary Teague, the Mayor and all members of the Edina City Council: We request the City continue with the exisiting Comprehensive Plan with the 4 story height limit, FAR requirements and prohibition of retail on the parcel at 72nd and France in Edina. Ron'and Carol Naae 4508 Dunham Drive Edina, MN i Jackie Hoogenakker From: Paul&Joyce Gutkowski. <pjgski @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 20148:29 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Opposed to Proposed Zoning changes for 7200 France Ms. Hoogenakker, Please pass on my following comments to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the Mayor, and the members of the City Council, before the City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 2. The existing City, Comprehensive Plan, with its 4 story height limit and prohibition of retail on the parcel at the corner of 72nd and France, is currently valid and should continue to be upheld. I would like to see the Council follow Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that proposals to change this Plan be denied. The developers need to. understand that this particular site must be redeveloped in compliance with the existing Master Plan. There is ample history to support this.position from a professional perspective as to what is in the best interest of our city and our neighborhood. The plan must take into consideration neighborhood value protection and traffic issues. Traffic is already strained on 72nd St, Lynmar Lane and Hazelton Road. The redesign of the intersection at 72nd St and France following the rebuilding of the Byerly's entrances and exits, have resulting in no left turns from 72nd St onto France Ave. As a result, all east bound traffic on 72nd, must first go left on Lynmar and then right on Hazelton, past the busy entrances to Sunrise Assisted Living and the Cremation Society, to then turn left onto France. The width of the road with parked cars on these 2 blocks is already down to one passable lane at busy times of the day, causing a driving hazard. Adding 100 plus cars to this already strained traffic backup is unreasonable and unacceptable. Sincerely, Paul Gutkowski 7316 Glouchester Dr Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hooaenakker Aom: Susan Friedrichs <swfriedrichs @outlook.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:58 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Larry Work Friedrichs Subject: France and 72nd Street Hi Jackie, Please forward the following message to Cary Teague. Thank you. We thank the City Council, Planning Commission and City Staff for their past support and adherence to the Master Comprehensive Plan. We strongly believe that the existing Comp Plan with it's four story height limit and prohibition of retail,on the parcel at the corner of France and 72nd St should be maintained. This building site is at the entrance to our neighborhood and is only blocks from Cornelia School. We believe it it is in the best interest of Edina to maintain the neighborhood; not contribute to additional pass- through traffic; not divert any more traffic through a clogged 71st Street near the Cremation Society or by Cornelia, thereby risking the school children. We therefore encourage the Council to follow Staff and Planning .:ommission recommendations that this proposal be denied. We would also like for the City Council to continue to uphold the Master Comprehensive Plan and not allow the developers to make changes to it on a piecemeal basis. Sincerely, Sue and Larry Friedrichs 4601 Gilford Drive Edina, MN 55435. 612 -751 -6156 swfriedrichs@outlook.com Ifriedrichs @blmss.com 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: hjbagley @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:18 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: beetlebug00 @gmaii.com Subject: Rezoning Proposal for 7200 France Dear Janet, please forward this message to Edina City Council, Cary Teague, and the Mayor. My wife and I have resided at 7113 Glouchester Ave. since 1974 and most of the changes in the neighborhood have related to sidewalks and the closure of the Lutheran Church and its replacement by Sunrise Assisted Living, and the closure of the street going by the Cremation Center so driver's do not cut through to avoid the intersection on 70th and France. The recent closing of the ability to turn left on France off 72nd greatly eliminated the traffic tie up at that location. There is still a lot of traffic in and out of the parking lot behind 7200 France. We strongly object to an increase in that traffic by increasing the site of any building at 7200 France or any retail in the building which leads to a great increase in the short t&rn parking in the lot dedicated to the address. The current zoning and traffic regulations work quite well for our residential neighborhood even though we get some speeders cutting down our street to the buffer duplexes at the end of 7113 Glouchester Drive. Please do not allow the proposed development at 7200 France and only allow submission of plans which meet the current Master Comprehensive Plan. Thank you for your attention and service. Harold And Terry Bagley. Jackie Hoogenakker from: Manish Virmani <manish.virmani @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:40 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: For Cary Teague I Reg. 7200 France Ave. zoning changes Hello Jackie, Could you kindly forward this email to Cary? Thanks, Manish. Hello Cary, I am writing this email as a concerned resident of 7312 Glouchester Drive, which is in close proximity to the site of proposed zoning changes at 7200 France Avenue. As you can imagine, I am deeply concerned and vehemently opposed to the idea of these zoning changes. There are many reasons for that and I am sure you have already heard them many times already so I won't repeat.; The only thing I would say is that these proposed changes will fundamentally change the character of Edina and what it offers to its residents. There are several reasons why people love to live in Edina, why people like myself moved to the city 5 years ago when I was still in my 20s, and why a change such as the one that is proposed will make me want to move to another city such as Plymouth or Maple Grove. My only request is that as in any democracy where the government should listen to its citizens, in this case; the City should listen to its residents and do what is right for them, and not for purely economic /financial reasons. Sincerely, Manish (Cell: 612- 325 -4103) 1 Jackie-, Hoogenakker From: NOOr <bhavno0r @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:42 PM To:, Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Reg. 7200 France zoning;,pls forward to Cary Teague Hello Jackie, Could you kindly forward this email to Cary? Thanks, Manish. Hello Cary, I am writing this email as a concerned resident of 7312 Glouchester Drive, which is in close proximity to the site of proposed zoning changes at 7200 France Avenue: As you can imagine, 'I am deeply concerned and vehemently opposed to the idea of these zoning changes. There -are many reasons for that and l am sure you have already heard them many times already so I won't repeat. The only thing would say is.that these proposed changes will fundamentally change the character of'Edina and what it offers to its residents. There are several reasons why people love to live in Edina, why people like myself moved to the city 5 years ago when I was still in" my 20s, and why a change such as the one that is proposed will make me want to move to another city such as Plymouth,or Maple Grove. My only request is that as in any democracy where the government should listen to its citizens, in this case, the City should listen to its residents and do what is right for them, and not for purely economic /financial reasons. Sincerely, Noor (Cell: 612- 325 -4239) 1 Jackie H000enakker "rom: Dean G.Tortorelis <zorba2 @yahoo.com> sent: Sunday, November 30, 201411:30 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Master Comprehensive Plan Please forward this email to The Mayor,city council members and community development director, Cary Teague. Dear Mayor, City Council Members,and Community Development Director, I strongly believe that the existing Comp Plan with .its four story height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of retail on the:parcel at the corner of 72nd and France is and will continue to be valid. I decry the fact. that.developers feel they can extort inappropriate concessions from the city. I would .like to see the Council follow Staff.and Planning Commission recommendations that this proposal be denied, and tell this and any.other developer'that this particular site MUST BE REDEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING MASTER PLAN. There is ample history to support this position from A professional perspective as to what is in the best interest of our city - .neighborhood value protection, traffic issues on both 72nd.and, France, safety of schoolchildren, etc. There is also a track record given previous meeting minutes as the same issues were:present in the precedent setting decision with regard to the Sunrise Assisted.Living Project. This is not a difficult call nor does it require lengthy analysis. I ask that you do the right thing and voice for all of us the City's opinion that on this particular site the redevelopments are set. Thank you. 3espectfully yours, Dean G Tortorelis, MD 7441 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 1' Jackie Hoogenakker From: DENA <dtortorelis @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 201411:30 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Master Comprehensive Plan Please forward this email to The Mayor,city council members and community development director, Cary Teague. Dear Mayor, City Council Members,and Community Development Director, I strongly believe that the existing Comp Plan with its four story height limit, FAR requirements, and prohibition of retail on the parcel at the corner of 72nd and France is and will continue to be valid. I decry the fact that developers feel they can extort inappropriate concessions from the city. I would like to see the Council follow Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that this proposal be denied, and tell this and any other developer that this particular site MUST BE REDEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING MASTER PLAN. There is ample history to support this position from a professional perspective as to what is in the best interest of our city - neighborhood value protection, traffic issues on both 72nd and France, safety of school children, etc. There is also a track record given previous meeting minutes as the same issues were present in the precedent setting decision with regard to the Sunrise Assisted Living Project. This is not a difficult call nor does it require lengthy analysis. I ask that you do the right thing and voice for all of us the City's opinion that on this particular site the redevelopments are set. Thank you. Respectfully yours, Dena Tortorelis 7441 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hooaenakker From: Rick Adair <Rick @adairplastics.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:51 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: re: proposed zoning changes for 7200 France Avenue Jackie Hoogenakker, Please forward this letter to the Community Development Director, the Mayor, and the other members of the City Council. To the Edina City Council, We are writing to express our strong objection to the proposed amendment of the Edina Comprehensive'Plan to allow this large apartment, retail, and row house development on the property at 7,200 France Avenue. The proposed structure is far too massive for the space available. Please retain the zoning of the existing Comprehensive Plan in your evaluation of development ideas for this site. My wife and I have lived at 7120 Lynmar Lane for 26 years and we know the neighborhood very well. We ask that you please consider these concerns: 1. We do not object to apartments and /or row houses on this property. Retail and restaurants, however, should not be placed. here. 2. The footprint of the proposed construction, and its height, are not appropriate to the size of this property which is directly adjacent to a residential neighborhood. 3. The redeveloped site must have entry and exit from Gallagher as well as 72nd Street, "as the present space now. Is has. Many of the people who live in the'Cornelia area use 72nd as their primary route to and from their homes. Adding significant additional traffic to 72 "d will make their passage more difficult. 4. Cornelia'Elementary school is just five blocks west of this proposed development. Traffic has always been a concern, especially with people using Cornelia Drive from 701h to 72nd as a short cut to avoid the intersection at 70`h St. and France Avenue. A large number of additional cars entering and exiting this development would add dangerous traffic to the area, jeopardizing elementary students who walk qr. ride .their bikes to school. In order to attract young families and maintain property values, Cornelia School students need to be protected. We ask that the Edina City Council deny this Development Plan. Please insist on a development which abides by the existing zoning rules of the Comprehensive Plan. Thank you for your consideration. Rick and Debbie Adair 7120 Lynmar Lane Edina, MN 55435 952- 926 -9576 rick @adairplastics.com Jackie Hoogenakker From: Tim Dulas <timd @bloomingtonelectric.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:02 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Kim Dulas (kdulas @mahoneymedia.com) Subject: Proposed Rezoning for 7200 France Ave. Good morning Jackie, My wife Kim (lifetime Edina resident) and 1(25 year resident) reside in the Lake Edina neighborhood. We strongly believe that the current proposal for the 7200 France Ave site is TOO dense for the site and the neighborhood. We would like to see the Council follow the Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that this proposal be denied. Please forward our request to Cary Teague, the Mayor, and the City Council. Thank you, Sincerely, Tim Dulas President Phone: (952) 888 -7905 Fax: (952) 888 -5108 Jackie Hooaenakker crom: Vanessa Otto <votto @guarantytitle.net> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 8:41 AM To: Jackie HQogenakker Subject: Zoning Letter Payment Jackie, I am mailing a check for a zoning letter for 7151 York Ave South, what is the address that I should send it to? Vanessa Otto Commercial Closing Assistant GUARANTY COMMERCIAL TITLE, INC. Renaissance Square 520 Nicollet Mall, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 t 612 - 746 -0424 f. 612- 337 -5966 Linkedln WBENC- Certified Women Owned Small Business UnOmited a • 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lou Ann and Kevin Oak <loukevoak @msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 7:40 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: 7200 France redevelopment Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, please forward my comments to Cary Teague and the Mayor and City Council. I am requesting the city stay with the existing Master Comprehensive Plan and keep the current zoning for 7200 France. The rezoning request is not appropriate for that area with the residential neighborhood that I live in right next to the proposed extremely large/ dense rental property. I am concerned about traffic patterns West on 72nd Street to Cornelia Drive and then North past the elementary school to access 70th Street. As planned there is no way for the potential residents to go to the North or West so they will ultimately travel into the neighborhood to get that way. Thus increasing an already busy 72nd Street/ Cornelia Drive intersection. My request is the rezoning request be denied and the city stay with its current plan for that parcel. Kevin Oak 7305 Cornelia Drive Edina > Subject: 7200 France redevelopment > From: loukevoak @msn.com > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:02:10 -0700 > To: ihooeenakker �edinamn.�ov > Dear Ms. Hoogenakker, > I object to the proposed redevelopment plan for 7200 France Avenue. The existing comprehensive plan with its 4 story height limit, FAR requirement and prohibition of retail on the parcel is appropriate. This site must be redeveloped in compliance with the existing master plan. > Please forward this to the planning commission and city council. > Respectfully, > Kevin Oak > 7305 Cornelia Drive > Sent from my iPhone Jackie Hoogenakker from: Maureen Wong. <maureenw0089 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01; 201412:09 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Avenue Jackie, I am alarmed! Alarmed by the size and scope of the project being considered for 7200 France Ave. My neighborhood would be greatly impacted by such a huge development. I am concerned what it might do to property values of those of us who already live here. I live at 72nd and Bristol Blvd,., so I am very concerned with traffic along 72nd which is already high and fast since 70th St. now has a 25 mph speed limit. How will France Ave handle so much more traffic? Rush hour is already dreaded by most of us. The water and sewer systems are also a great source of concern. How will they handle the extra stress put on them? We have several new buildings behind Byerly's, the ones at Southdale and the building that will go in the Wicks Furniture spot. Why can't we wait a while until we see what happens with congestion and infrastructure once they are fully occupied? I respectfully request that the City of Edina stay within the Comprehensive Plan limits before approval of any building begins on this site.. I respectfully request that any development on that property stay strictly within the current zoning guidelines as office /residential, which includes height, density and ratio of living units to space. Our neighborhood understands that the current zoning allows for 4 stories and no more than 105 living units. Many hours of study and discussion went into these regulations and should be maintained. understand that this location is not zoned for restaurants, but the developer seems to have other ideas. This should not be allowed to happen! The traffic, parking, restaurant deliveries and trash pick -up would create chaos in the neighborhood. I think an objective, independent traffic study should take place very soon. Please consider the precedent this high density residence would set for future development all along France to 494. This is not in the best interest of this quiet neighborhood. I understand the Planning Commission is not supporting the current proposal due to the high density among other reasons. Something like Sunrise would be much more preferrable. Please forward my opinions and concerns to Cary Teague, the Director of Community Development, the Mayor and all members of the city council. Thank you. Maureen Wong 7.128 Bristol Blvd. 952 927 0089 Jackie,, Hoogenakker From: Richard Naistat zjrnaistat @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:01 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker. Cc: Richard Naistat Subject: Input to City Council meeting on Dec. 2nd regarding Proposed Rezoning of 7200 France Ave: S. Jackie, Please forward this e-mail to all members of the City Council and the Mayor. Regarding the proposed rezoning of the property at 7200 France Ave. S., I remain opposed to the requested changes in zoning by the developers. I am asking you to remain committed to the Master Comprehensive Plan. In particular, I want you to stick with existing Floor Area Ratio and "specifically limiting development to no more than 4 stories. Should you permit the rezoning, I would be ,very concerned about increased traffic in my neighborhood, and attendant safety concerns for youngsters attending Comelia:Elementary School. I was at the Planning Commission meeting on November 12th at which the proposed rezoning was voted down by the Planning Commission by a vote of 8 -0. 1 am asking you to follow the lead of the Planning Commission and turn down the developer's request for rezoning of the 7200 France Ave. S. site. Sincerely, Richard J. Naistat 7044 Kellogg Ave. S. Edina, MN 55435 952 - 929 -3235 '1 1. 2. 3. 4. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Paige Norwood <paige_d_norwood @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 9:30 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Avenue Development To Whom It May Concern: As invested and concerned members of the Cornelia neighborhood, and as an active family with young children, we would be significantly adversely affected by the proposed development. We have several heartfelt objections to the proposed 7200 France Ave project: The increase in vehicular traffic on the neighborhood side roads puts our families, in particular our young children, at risk (tenants would use our home streets as a thoroughfare to get to West 70th street and Highway 100). It will devastate the quiet and peaceful neighborhood culture and community we have worked hard to establish. We are a front yard neighborhood. We walk our streets with strollers. We play in our driveways and streets. It will increase the traffic about Cornelia Elementary. School, again endangering children. There are a number of other new apartment buildings (at least 5) already under development in Edina within less than a half mile radius of this proposed development. The traffic on France Avenue and the side roads and the existing shopping infrastructure cannot support the addition of even one more vehicle from yet another development. Regards, Andrew & Paige Misselt 7104 Heatherton Trail Edina MN 1 n REPORT /RECOMMENDATION .a To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action M Discussion M Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Final Development Plan And Final Rezoning To PUD -3 Zoning District, 6500 France Avenue, Aurora Investments, LLC, Resolution No. 2014 -152 and Ordinance No. 2014 -24 Action Requested: Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3, Planned Unit Development District & Final Development Plan Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -152, approving the Final Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and Final Development Plan. Waive second reading and approve Ordinance No. 2014 -24 amending the PUD -3 Zoning District. Planning Commission Recommendation: On November 12, 2014 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan: Vote: 7 Ayes, 1 Nays. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan per the findings and conditions outlined in the attached Resolution. Information /Background: (No Deadline) Aurora Investments, LLC are requesting final review for redevelopment of 6500 France Avenue. Specifically, the request is to change the use from medical office, which was previously approved for the site, to 100 units of senior assisted and independent living; 54 units of traditional care /skilled nursing; 34 units of memory care, and 7 care suites. The "care" suites would include short term stays by patients that have had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The parking would be provided underground. There would be a 15,000 square foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previously approved medical office plan that was proposed for the site. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A6 —A49 of the Planning Commission Staff Report.) The applicant has already received the following approvals of the City Council: ➢ A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing as a permitted use in the Regional Medical District, at a maximum density of 80 units per acre. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 ➢ Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD, Planned Unit Development -3 Zoning District; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. The density of the development excluding the transitional care suites for short term stays of patients of the hospital and TCO is 80 units per acre. The first floor of the new building would contain uses accessory to the senior housing, including a pub, barber shop /beauty salon, coffee /bistro, and fitness center. The request before the City Council is as follows: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved preliminary development plans. As noted on pages A14 -A15, of the applicant narrative, the following slight modifications have been made: • A slight reduction in building square footage (2,000 s.f.) • A slight decrease to west setback (3.5 feet), but green space was added with the elimination of the concrete sidewalk. • Slight variance in housing unit counts • Slight parking modifications, but still code compliant. • Refined the floor and roof plans. • Due to anticipated damage to the boulevard trees on France, they have been programed to be removed and replaced. • Refined the exterior of the skyway to be consistent with the new building and parking ramp. • Worked with the property owner to the West (Cornelia Place Apartments) regarding entrance and exits and providing additional landscape plantings on the Cornelia Place Apartment property to provide additional screening. • Lowered the loading dock area and provided an overhead structure for screening. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014 -152 • Ordinance No. 2014 -24 • Planning Commission minutes, November 12, 2014 • City Council minutes, August 5, 2013 (Comp. Plan Amendment & Prelim. Rezoning) • Planning Commission staff report dated November 12, 2014 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-152 APPROVING FINAL REZONING TO AMEND THE PUD -3, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - 3 ZONING DISTRICT AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AURORA INVESTMENTS AT 6500 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Aurora Investments, LLC is requesting a rezoning from to amend the PUD -3, Planned Unit Development District to allow a five - story, 62 -foot tall senior housing development at 6500 France Avenue and 4005 West 65th Street. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: All of Lot 4 and the Easterly 56.44 feet of Lot 3, Block 2 Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And Lot 3, Block 2, except the Easterly 58.44 feet thereof, Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota. 1.03 On November 12, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the proposal, and recommended approval of the request, with added conditions failed. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, provides underground parking, and provides an indoor pedestrian connection to the hospital. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952- 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-152 Page 2 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, architectural precast concrete, and glass, and is compatible with previously approved medical building. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. Traffic generated by the proposed project would be less than the approved medical building for the site. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linear buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 7. The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the project to the Hospital. 8. Convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-152 Page 3 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3, Planned Unit Development District and Final Development Plan subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 15, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped October 15, 2014 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 15% over the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated November 5, 2014. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-152 Page 4 9. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 10. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 11. Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. 12. Affordable housing units shall be 10% (10 units) of the assisted and independent units. 13. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on December 2, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2014. City Clerk 6— 1% ORDINANCE NO. 2014-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVISING PUD -3, EDINA MEDICAL BUILDING INTO PUD -3, AURORA ON FRANCE A SENIOR HOUSING AND CARE SUITE FACILITY AT 6500 FRANCE AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 36 -490 of the Edina City Code. Planned Unit Development District — 3, (PUD -3), Edina Medical Building is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -490. Planned Unit Development District -3 (PUD -3), Edina Medical Building Aurora on France. (a) Legal description. (1) All of Lot 4 and the easterly 56.44 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and (2) Lot 3, Block 2, except the easterly 56.44 feet thereof, Southdale Office Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (b) Approved plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the 6500 France €tea Updirn ^' R. -MI ^ ^Aurora on France plans received by the city on NevembeF 6, 2012, October 15 & 27, 2014 except as amended by city council Resolution No. 2012 2014 -152, on file in the office of the planning department under file number 20!2 nno 3�a: 2012.003.14a. (c) Principal uses (1) All principal uses allowed in the Regional Medical District (RMD) Zoning District, except drive - through uses. (2) Senior Independent, Assisted Living /Nursing Home, Transitional Care Suites and Memory Care Suites as proposed in the Approved Plans above. (d) Accessory uses. The following are the accessory uses allowed in the Regional Medical District (RMD): (1) Off- street parking facilities. (2) Produce stands, pursuant to permit issued by the city manager. (3) Signs allowed per the Regional Medical District. (e) Conditional uses. There are no conditional uses for Planned Unit Development District -3 (PUD -3). Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX 4 ;C4 (f) Development standards. Development standards per the RMD zoning district, except the following: (1) Building setbacks. a. Front. 1. France Avenue: 25 feet. 2. 65th Street: 25 feet. b. Side —West: 489 43 feet. c. Rear — South: 20 & 30 feet. a. FFORt. 1. €Fanee- Avenr, .., 'b. S ede=�V�est.. 15 feet. c. `1►1 20 feet. (3) Building height: five stories or 62 feet. (4) Maximum floor area ratio: 489 220 percent. (5) Chiller /mechanical equipment setbacks. If the footprint is larger than 36 square feet in area or six feet in height, utility and /or mechanical equipment shall be required to meet the front setback requirements in subsection (f)(1) of this section. The side and rear setback requirements shall be six feet. Mechanical equipment must also meet the following conditions: a. All mechanical equipment accessory to any building shall be screened from all lot lines and streets in accordance with section 36 -1459. b. Noise from mechanical equipment shall be subject to the city's noise regulations in accordance with article II, division 5 of chapter 16. (6) Signage per article XIII, division 5 section 36 -1715 (Regional Medical District). Existing text – XXXX 2 Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX Minutes /Edina Citv Council /August S. 2013 IV.G. Request For Purchase — HD Playback Equipment for Edina and Eden Prairie Government Access Channels, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Alpha Video and Comcast at $113,363 IV.H. Reject Bids — Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. III, ENG 13 -16 IV.I. Approve Change Order— Lake Edina Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction — Landscaping IV.J. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 6443 McCauley Terrace Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.A APPROVAL OF MINUTES — REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 16, 2013, APPROVED AS CORRECTED AND WORK SESSION OF JULY 16, 2013, APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Sprague requested the following correction to the Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013: Item VLA, page 4, bullet point six of the motion to state: "Front Facing Garage: eliminate ". Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the Regular Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013 as amended above, and approving the Work Session Meeting Minutes of July 16, 2013 as presented. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V. A. QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY RESULTS PRESENTATION — DR. BILL MORRIS, DECISION RESOURCES — PRESENTED Dr. Bill Morris of Decision Resources Limited, provided a presentation and answered questions of the City Council on the major findings of the 2013 Quality of Life Survey. Vl. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, AMENDMENT TO PUD REZONING, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AURORA PROJECTS LLC, 6500 FRANCE AVENUE & 4005 65TH STREET WEST, RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -61 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -62 (COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT— AFFIRMATIVE ROLL CALL VOTE OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS; REZONING AMENDMENT — FIRST READING REQUIRES OFFERING OF ORDINANCE ONLY. SECOND READING. FAVORABLE ROLLCALL VOTE OF THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS. WAIVER OF SECOND READING. AFFIRMATIVE ROLLCALL VOTE OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PASS) — ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the preliminary development plan of Aurora Projects LLC, 6500 France Avenue & 4005 65th Street West with the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and amendment to PUD rezoning. Mr. Teague explained that the City Council had been requested to consider a change to the proposal to redevelop the property at 6500 France Avenue. The previously approved plan for the site was a five -story, 62 -foot tall, 102,478 square foot medical office /retail building with an attached 4 -5 level parking ramp. Mount Development and Aurora Investments, LLC were "requesting consideration of a change in use to 111 units of senior assisted and independent living; 66 units of transitional care /skilled nursing and memory care beds; and, 18 care suites. The "care" suites would include short term stays by patients who have had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). The building would be similar in style to the previously approved building and still be five stories in height. A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The previously approved parking ramp would be removed and replaced with housing. The parking would be provided underground. There would be a 15,000 square -foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previous plan. Mr. Teague. explained to accommodate the request, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and an amendment to the PUD Zoning District would be required. The density of the development including all of Page 2 0 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 the different types of units, at a total of 195, would be 83 units per acre, which would be a density higher than any development currently existing in Edina. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "Regional Medical -RM." Senior Housing is not an allowed use within the RM designation. Therefore, the proposed use would require a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. The proponent had requested a Guide Plan amendment that would allow Senior Assisted Living Housing as a permitted use within the Regional Medical District. The transitional care units were already allowed in the RM District. Mr. Teague stated a Planning Commission motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning and Site Plan failed on a vote of 4 -5. The motion for approval included several conditions. Based on the comments and recommendations from the Planning Commission, the proponent had revised the proposed plans to address those concerns. Mr. Teague presented details of the revised plans presented by the proponent: • Chillers have been moved from the west side of the property near the loading area to the far northeast corner of the roof, and would be completely screened. • The upper floor balconies have been adjusted to conform to the originally stated setbacks. • Created a podium setback on'the west side of the building and shifted the building six feet away from the west lot line. The third, fourth, and fifth floors would have a 58 -foot setback, and the first and second floors would have a 48 -foot setback. The previous plan had a 42 -foot setback for all floors. • Attempted to create a more pedestrian friendly environment on France Avenue by relocating a coffee shop /bistro and moving the public art to the corner. • Added twelve large coniferous trees on the Cornelia Apartment site for additional landscaping. • Moved the resident garage access to the north wing on the west side (was previously on the south wing). • Created a dock high access door and extended the memory garden slab over the truck dock. This would provide screening of the trucks during unloading. • Agreed to limit the hours of major deliveries to 9 a.m. through. 4 p.m. • Created several service vehicle short-term parking spaces on 65th Street West at the front door for smaller truck deliveries. This would reduce the number of deliveries on the west side of the building. • Added a third lane to the proposed west entrance on 65th Street West. • Agreed to quantifiable benchmarks for sustainability. A pledge to attempt to achieve an 18% savings over baseline systems (In comparison, Byerly's pledged to achieve a 10% savings.). • Reduced the number of units from 197 to 195. • Increased affordable housing from four units to 10% of the assisted and independent units (11 units). Mr. Teague reviewed suburban examples of high density regulation and development in the cities of St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, and Bloomington. He presented suggested Comprehensive Plan Amendment language as recommended by staff, and advised that staff was further suggesting flexibility in regard to density for senior housing in the HDR District, as well as the RM District. Mr. Teague stated using the recommended amended text as a basis for review of the subject project, a case could be made to support the proposed high density through the PUD Zoning process. The proposed project would be connected to Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway so residents would not have to go outside to go to appointments at the hospital. Based on the traffic study by WSB, the use would generate less traffic than would a 102,000 square -foot medical office building with retail uses on the first level. There would be adequate sewer capacity to serve the project, and water would-be available to the site. Convenient transit service was available for workers and residents as the MTC #6 bus was available at the building. Additional routes in the Southdale area were the 515, 538, 539, 578, 579, and 684. The building would include sustainable design principles, public art, and affordable housing with primary parking below grade. Mr. Teague reported on staffs recommendation that the City Council approve the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing in the RM District; to potentially allow greater density for senior housing development under certain circumstances on a case -by -case basis; that the City Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District; and, approve the Preliminary Development Plan subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. , Mr. Teague answered questions of the City Council relating to senior housing building density examples; public access to retail amenities; affordable housing calculation; the proposed green roof parking structure and terrace area; and, sustainability. Mr. Teague stated he would be involved with the sustainability element of the development. He answered additional questions of the City Council relating to the relocation of the chiller; parking requirements; definition of senior housing to include transitional care /skilled nursing; trash pickup; and, density level / floor area ratio in relation to the previously approved plan and the plan as currently proposed. Proponent Presentation Members of the Development Team, Luigi Bernardi of Aurora Development, LLC, Stephen Michals of Mount Development, Susan Farr of Ebenezer, and Edward Farr of Edward Farr Architects, provided information on the Preliminary Development Plan for 6500 France Avenue and 4005 65th Street West, including modifications made to the proposed plan following the July 10, 2013, Planning Commission meeting. The Development Team answered questions of the City Council relating to the skyway, public access to retail amenities, parking, and setbacks. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Maria Field, Chief Executive of Heritage of Edina, 3420 Heritage Drive, addressed the Council. Kate Hamilton - Sones, Director of Nursing at Heritage of Edina, 3420 Heritage Drive, addressed the Council. Ron Kalick, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 901, addressed the Council. Marilyn Kemme, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 1206, addressed the Council. Mark Waterston, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 1203, addressed the Council. Dalia Katz, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 503, addressed the Council. Ralph Laiderman, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 402, addressed the Council. Craig Alshouse, Developer, Co- Owner, and Manager of Cornelia Place, 4025 West 65th Street, addressed the Council. Maria Kalick, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 901, addressed the Council. Susan Laiderman, Resident of Point of France, 6566 France Avenue South, Unit 402, addressed the Council. Tanya Belanger, 6326 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. City Attorney Mattick addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating that action on the proposed Guide Plan Amendment would not set a precedent for other developments in relation to density. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Chuck Rickart, WSB, addressed issues raised during public testimony, providing information on the traffic study associated with the proposed development. Mr. Farr and Mr. Michals addressed issues raised during public testimony, providing information on trees included in the landscaping plan, distance between buildings, proximity of the building to the sidewalk, trash pickup, and density. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to staffs recommendation for approval with the proposed density. He stated the traffic study showed that the revised plan would generate less traffic than the original proposal, adequate parking would be provided, there would be the connection to the hospital, the skyway, public access to the retail amenities, an affordable housing component, sustainability, the building would not be taller than the originally proposed building with the cubic footage actually reduced, and the parking would not be a surface parking lot. He stated the proposed development had reached a level that would be a benefit to the City. There was discussion on density, the affordable housing component, and regulation of trash pickup hours and /or coordination of trash pickup with the neighboring development. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -61, Approving a Guide Plan Amendment to Allow Senior Housing in the RM District and Determine Maximum Densities for Senior Housing on a case -by -case basis, based on the following findings: 1. Senior Housing is a compatible use with the Regional Medical District. It would provide seniors a benefit of having medical facilities within close proximity. 2. Densities for Senior Housing within the RM & HDR Districts would be determined on a case by case basis, allowing the City some discretion as to when high density for senior housing may be appropriate. Densities for senior housing would be based on proximity to hospitals, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit'service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. 3. In general, senior housing generates less traffic than all -age housing or medical office facilities. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Roll call vote Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -62, Approving Preliminary Rezoning to Amend the PUD, Planned Unit Development — 3 Zoning District and Preliminary Development Plan for Aurora Investments at 6500 France and 4005 West 65th Street, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, provides underground parking, and provides an indoor pedestrian connection to the hospital. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, architectural precast concrete, and glass, and is compatible with previously approved medical building. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. S. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. Traffic generated by the proposed project would be less than the approved medical building for the site. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 7. Higher densities are justified for the following reasons: The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the project to the Hospital; Senior Housing would generate less traffic than the approved medical building with retail on the site; existing roadways would support the project; adequate utilities are available to the site; convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated July 26, 2013; including construction of the skyway connection to the Fairview Hospital parking ramp. 2. A noise study must be done to demonstrate that the proposed mechanical equipment meets all noise regulations. 3. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's revised narrative. 4. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. S. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated July 2, 2013. 6. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 7. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. 8. Affordable housing units shall be 10% of all units with the exception of the transitional care units. ##K- assisted and independem units (11 uRft-,.4 9. Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Member Sprague seconded the motion. A friendly amendment was offered by Member Bennett, accepted by Member Swenson and Member Sprague, to amend Condition No. 9 as follows: Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm.,,as shall trash pick -up unless otherwise coordinated with neighboring buildings. The developer agreed to list Cary Teague as Design Team Member for purposes of the Xcel EDA program, and that Mr. Teague would be copied on all communications with Xcel concerning sustainability measures related to the EDA program. Roll call vote: Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 5, 2013 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. CONSIDER ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS & MODIFICATIONS OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 2013-63 — ADOPTED City Manager Presentation Manager Neal presented information on the City's issuance of Build America Bonds in 2009 to help finance construction of the new Public Works building. The agreement stated that if the federal government were to short the City on its planned subsidy of those bonds, it would give the City the ability to refinance those bonds. The City had not received the August 1, 2013 scheduled subsidy payment on the bonds from the federal government. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, the City might issue bonds to finance capital expenditures under its Capital Improvement Plan without election provided that, among other things, prior to issuing the bonds the City adopted the Plan after a public hearing thereon and published a notice of its intention to issue the bonds and the date and time of a hearing to obtain public comment on the matter. It was anticipated that the City would save approximately $200,000 over the life of the bonds. The public hearing scheduled tonight was to receive public testimony on the proposed refinance of the Build America Bonds. Finance Director Wallin informed the Council that Resolution No. 2013 -63 would adopt a modification to the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and approve the issuance of the General Obligation Bonds for the refinancing. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -63, adopting a modification to the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and approving the issuance of General Obligation Bonds. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vlll.. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. PRIORITY USE POLICY BRAEMER ARENA Parks and Recreation Director Presentation Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh presented background discussions on a priority use policy for Braemar Arena due to the demand for prime season ice at the Arena. While Braemar Arena was currently able to meet nearly 100% of ice needs for Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club (BCLFSC), it was only able. to meet less than 50% of the ice needs for the Edina Hockey Association (EHA). Ms. Kattreh stated staff had hosted three meetings, each with three representatives from the EHA and the BCLFSC, to work towards a solution for the priority access agreement and ice allocation at the Arena. At the end of the third meeting, they were .unable to reach an agreement that was acceptable to both the EHA and BCLFSC. Consistent with the message to the EHA and BCLSFSC at the start of the process, if the group could not reach consensus on a draft priority use policy for the arena, staff would draft one unilaterally and submit it Page 7 ,r VII. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District. 6500 France Avenue, Edina, MN for Aurora Investments LLC Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Mount Development and Aurora Investments, LLC are requesting final review for redevelopment of 6500 France Avenue. Specifically, the request is to change the use from medical office, which was previously approved for the site, to 100 units of senior assisted and independent living; 54 units of traditional'care /skilled nursing; 34 units of memory care, and 7 care suites. The "care" suites would include short term stays by patients that have had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The parking would be provided underground. There would be a 15,000 square foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previously approved medical office plan that was proposed for the site. The applicant has already received the following approvals of the City Council: ➢ A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing as a permitted use in the Regional Medical District, at a maximum density of 80 -units per acre, ,Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD, Planned Unit Development -3 Zoning District; and Preliminary Development Plan. Teague explained that the density of the development excluding the transitional care suites for short term stays of patients of the hospital and TCO is 80 units per acre. The first floor of the new building would contain uses accessory to the senior housing, including a pub, barber shop /beauty salon, coffee /bistro, and fitness center. The request before the Planning Commission is as follows: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District. 2.. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. Teague reported that the proposed plans are consistent with the approved preliminary development plans. As noted on pages A 14 -A 15, of the applicant narrative, the following slight modifications have been made: • A slight reduction in building square footage (2,000 s.f.) • A slight decrease to west setback (3.5 feet), but green space was added with the elimination of the concrete sidewalk. • Slight variance in housing unit counts • Slight parking modifications, but still code compliant. • Refined the floor and roof plans. • Due to anticipated damage to the boulevard trees on France, they have been programed to be removed and replaced. • Refined the exterior of the skyway to be consistent with the new building and parking ramp. • Worked with the property owner to the West (Cornelia Place Apartments) regarding entrance and exits and providing additional landscape plantings on the Cornelia Place Apartment property to provide additional screening. • Lowered the loading dock area and provided an overhead structure for screening. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District, and approve the Final Development Plan based on the following findings: I . The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, provides underground parking, and provides an indoor pedestrian connection to the hospital. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, architectural precast concrete, and glass, and is compatible with previously approved medical building. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the, right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. Traffic generated by the proposed project would be less than the approved medical building for the site. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linear buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian - scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 7. The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the project to the Hospital. 8. Convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. Final approval is also subject to the following conditions: I . Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 15, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped October 15, 2014 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. S. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 15% over the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated November 5, 2014. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 9. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 10. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65`' Street and France Avenue. 1 I. Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. 12. Affordable housing units shall be 10% of the assisted and independent units. (10 units.) 13. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. And finally recommend the City Council adopt the Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD -3 Zoning District. Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Michals, Mount Development and Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects, Luigi Bernardi, Aurora Investments. Applicant Presentation Mr. Michals addressed the Commission indicating he was happy to be presenting the project for final approval. Michals said he was pleased with the project and the size and variety of senior services it will offer. He added that a number of the services that will be provided are not offered in the community at this time. Continuing, Michals stated they propose to be good neighbors and will offer to share specific services with Cornelia Place and Point of France. The intent is to create a community within the building. In conclusion, Michals said with this project traffic impact is reduced and further noted parking will be contained underground. Ed Farr delivered a power point presentation. Farr reported that similar building materials will be used on the proposed ramp so it appears to be "sister" skyway to the existing skyway that connects the hospital and ramp. Farr presented a materials board highlighting the exterior building materials that would be used on the building. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Mr. Farr if skyway access is available. Farr responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Platteter asked if the housing units are owner occupied or rental. Farr responded all units are rental units. Platteter asked if the proposed "bistro" would be signed. Farr responded that hasn't been decided; however if signage was added it would comply with City sign requirements!. Continuing, Platteter asked how the "Halo" would be lighted. Farr responded that the halo is backlit." Platteter asked Farr if they have settled on a size for the boulevard trees. Farr responded the boulevard trees and plants will be top end; however, there is a water main they need to work with; adding trees lost, replaced and added would be as large as possible. Commissioner Carr complimented the applicants on their proposal and responding to earlier concerns expressed by the Commission and Council. Commissioner Schroeder said he has some questions and concerns with the project Schroeder questioned if any of the amenities (bistro, fitness areas, and hair salon) are public spaces or are they only for residents of the building. Schroeder noted hospital employees and neighboring facilities may want to use those services. Michals agreed; however, he stated he believes the hair salon would only be used by residents of the building, adding the coffee, shop would be accessible by the public Schroeder commented when the City decided to grant relief to developers to encourage buildings to be moved closer to the street there was a reason; engaging the public and creating interaction to the street, adding he doesn't believe that goal was accomplished with this project. Continuing, Schroeder also added in his opinion the project as presented needs more landscape relief and the 8- surface parking spaces allocated for the project aren't enough. Schroeder said he was also disappointed with the interior site movements. Mr. Farr responded that residents would need to be educated on the interior and exterior site movements and landscaping can be revisited. Farr acknowledged there is difficulty in providing resident security and full public access. Commissioner Halva commended the development team on their design; however, was concerned with the site's 8 surface parking spaces. She asked if overflow parking could be accommodated in the hospital ramp. Mr. Michals responded that the parking ramp is the hospitals ramp; however, parking would be available in the ramp, but it wouldn't be advertised. Michals pointed out the building meets the City's parking requirements, adding he doesn't believe parking would be an issue, noting the average age of residents is 84. Commissioner Forrest said one of her concerns is with security. She said she wants assurances that security will be tight. Mr. Michals agreed, adding Ebenezer also expressed concerns and continue to work on the security plan. Forrest said another issue for her is the internal traffic circulation and stacking. She said in her opinion there isn't much space, pointing out Metro Mobility regularly services senior care facilities. Mr. Farr responded that a turn off lane (slip aisle) would be provided for services like Metro Mobility, etc. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Hearin Gene Persha„ 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Commission and expressed concerns about the continuing pressure on density in the greater Southdale area. Kathy Fondell, 6566 France Avenue, complemented the applicants on the project; however, expressed concern with traffic and that the sidewalks are too close to the street. Laurie Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Commission and expressed concern with the lack of on -site surface parking; 8 spaces aren't enough. Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Discussion Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify for the Commission what's required to proceed. Planner Teague said the Commission is to review the proposal for its consistency with preliminary approval. Commissioner Olsen stated she wasn't on the Commission at the time of preliminary approval, and asked if staff was comfortable with the proposed public parking spaces. Teague indicated staff was comfortable with the parking elements of the project. Motion Commissioner Carr moved to recommend final rezoning and final development plan approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest asked for a brief clarification on traffic patterns and parking. Planner Teague responded that the traffic analysis indicated that the proposed use of 100 -units of senior assisted and independent living; 54 -units of traditional care /skilled nursing; 34 -units of memory care and 7 -care suites would generate less traffic than the previously approved medical office building. Commissioner Schroeder said in his opinion the project as proposed does not enhance the pedestrian experience. The "new" use does not encourage any interaction with the street, public, etc. which was'an important component in the vision of encouraging public and private space interaction. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Olsen, Platteter, Carr, Forrest, Staunton. Nay, Schroeder. Motion carried 7 -1 Commissioner Carr moved to recommend a zoning ordinance amendment establishing the PUD. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder said he cannot support the motion because it fails to meet City standards. Schroeder said the building as proposed does not meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan with regard to building height, density and the pedestrian experience, noting the building also does not provide the podium or "stepped back" element suggested to soften its impact.from the street. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Olsen, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton. Nays; Schroeder. Motion carried 7 -1. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague November 12, 2014 VII.C. Community Development Director INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Mount Development and Aurora Investments, LLC are requesting final review for redevelopment of 6500 France Avenue. Specifically, the request is to change the use from medical office, which was previously approved for the site, to 100 units of senior assisted and independent living; 54 units of traditional care /skilled nursing; 34 units of memory care, and 7 care suites. (See location on pages A1- A5.) The "care" suites would include short term stays by patients that have had surgery at Fairview Hospital or Twin City Orthopedic (TCO). A pedestrian skyway would connect the building to the hospital parking ramp to the north. The parking would be provided underground. There would be a 15,000 square foot reduction in the structure footprint from the previously approved medical office plan that was proposed for the site. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A6 —A49.) The applicant has already received the following approvals of the City Council: ➢ A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow senior housing as a permitted use in the Regional Medical District, at a maximum density of 80 units per acre. ➢ Preliminary Rezoning to amend the PUD, Planned Unit Development -3 Zoning District; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. The density of the development excluding the transitional care suites for short term stays of patients of the hospital and TCO is 80 units per acre. The first floor of the new building would contain uses accessory to the senior housing, including a pub, barber shop /beauty salon, coffee /bistro, and fitness center. The request before the Planning Commission is as follows: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District. 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved preliminary development plans. As noted on pages A14-Al 5, of the applicant narrative, the following slight modifications have been made: • A slight reduction in building square footage (2,000 s.f.) • A slight decrease to west setback (3.5 feet), but green space was added with the elimination of the concrete sidewalk. • Slight variance in housing unit counts • Slight parking modifications, but still code compliant. • Refined the floor and roof plans. • Due to anticipated damage to the boulevard trees on France, they have been programed to be removed and replaced. • Refined the exterior of the skyway to be consistent with the new building and parking ramp. • Worked with the property owner to the West (Cornelia Place Apartments) regarding entrance and exits and providing additional landscape plantings on the Cornelia Place Apartment property to provide additional screening. • Lowered the loading dock area and provided an overhead structure for screening. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Fairview Hospital parking ramp; zoned APD, Automobile Parking District Easterly: Fairview Hospital; zoned and guided Regional Medical District. Southerly: Point of France condos; Zoned PRD-4, Planned Residential District & High Density Residential Westerly: Cornelia Place Apartments; zoned PRD-4, High Density Residential; and guided HDR, High Density Residential Existing Site Features The subject property is 2.34 acres in size, is relatively flat. (See pages Al —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: RM, Regional Medical. (See pages A5 —A6.) Zoning: PUD -3, Planned Unit Development District. 2 Comprehensive Guide Plan /Density As mentioned, the Comprehensive Plan guides this site for RM, Regional Medical Use. Senior Housing is now allowed in the RM District, and the density range is a maximum of 80 units per acre. The Met Council has approved the City's Comprehensive Plan amendments regarding the density and senior housing as an allowed use in the RMD District. Amending the PUD -3 District The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this site to amend the PUD -3 District to allow Senior Independent and Assisted Living /Nursing Home along with Transitional Care associated with the adjacent hospital and other facilities performing surgery. (See attached draft PUD Ordinance.) Within a PUD District, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent of the PUD. The table on the following page demonstrates a comparison of the base zoning (PUD -3) compared to the proposed. Compliance Table *Would require a variation from Previous approved PUD W City Standard Proposed (PUD -3) (PUD -3) Building Setbacks Front — France Avenue 25 feet 25 & 35 feet Front — 65th Street 25 feet 25 feet Side — West. 15 feet (parking structure 43 feet Rear — South 20 feet 20 feet Building Height Five - Stories and 62 feet Five - Stories & 62 feet Maximum Floor Area 1.0% 2.2 %* Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 133 — Based on: 134 Provided .5 exposed stalls per unit (50) (126 underground + 10 surface) .25 enclosed stall per unit (25) 1 per employee (33) 1 per 4 residents — nursing /memory/care (25) Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet *Would require a variation from Previous approved PUD W As demonstrated above, the proposed building complies with all setback requirements of the previously approved PUD. The only change proposed is in regard to the FAR. Per Section 850.04. Subd. 4 D provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The .decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; 4 g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and L ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The general land uses would be consistent with land uses allowed in the area. The adjacent sites to the south and west are guided High Density Residential. With Senior Housing being a permitted use in the Regional Medical District, the land uses area consistent. Staff believes the proposed land uses, Senior Housing and Transitional Care associated with the hospital would be better use of land than the previously approved Medical Office. As with the previously approved medical project for the site, this proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The building would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. This project goes a step further and provides a skyway pedestrian link to the Fairview Southdale Hospital. (See pages A16 -A18.) Parking would be located under the proposed housing; and would not be visible. The previous approved plans included a large parking ramp setback just 15 feet to the west lot line. The new building would expand that setback to 43 feet. (See page A28a.) Landscaping and balconies are proposed in front along France Avenue. The corner of the building still opens up to France and 65th. The individual store fronts have been eliminated; however, the large store -front type windows remain. Uses on this side of the building would be a coffee shop /bistro and fitness room; so activity within these spaces will be evident from the street. The applicant is again proposing to utilize sustainable design principals. Green building practices are suggested, and green roofs are proposed. (See pages A10 —Al2, of the applicant's narrative that explains how this project meets the above purpose and intent of the PUD Ordinance.) The applicant has also agreed to attempt to meet an energy savings goal of 15% over the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant is also proposing to provide affordable per the Planning Commission and City Council recommendation of 10% of all the senior housing units, which would be a total of eighteen (18) units. 1:1 Z Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. With the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to allow senior housing, this site would contain uses that are allowed in the Regional Medical District. The Zoning Ordinance amendment, which follows this staff report, lists the uses that would be allowed on this site. WSB and Associates did a parking analysis that determined that the proposed parking would support the uses proposed, and the traffic generated would actually be less than the previously approved medical office. (See pages A61 -A88.) b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposal would include a mixture of land uses. It would include senior housing, nursing home /assisted living type housing, memory care, and care suites associated with the adjacent hospital. Retail would also be provided as an accessory use to the residents of the building, including a coffee shop on the corner. A skyway connection is proposed to connect the uses to Fairview Southdale Hospital. ii, any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned above, the proposed uses would be senior housing, care suites and limited retail, consistent with Comprehensive Plan as senior housing is acceptable in the Regional Medical District. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and 0 The proposed residential density of 80 units per acre is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which limits senior housing in the RMD District to 80 units per acre. Senior housing typically does not generate as much traffic as an all age apartment or medical office. Density is typically tied to proximity to low density residential areas, availability to provide utilities to the site (sewer and water), proximity to transit service and impact on roadways. This site is adequately served by public utilities, there is adequate sewer capacity, the use would generate less traffic that the previously approved office building, and transit service is available on France and 65th. Staff believes the density is appropriate for this site given the adjacent high density land uses, proximity to the hospital, the provision of the skyway connection tying the land uses together and the lesser impact on the roads than the approved medical office. Additional items that might warrant higher density would be the underground parking, affordable housing element, and public art proposed. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The proposed project does closely relate to the already approved PUD setbacks for the site as demonstrated above. For the reasons stated above, staff believes the purpose and intend of the PUD Ordinance is met. Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off of 65th Street West. There would be no right -out only onto France; as was allowed in the previous PUD. Parking Per Section 850.08 Subd. 1, the following are the parking requirements: Senior Housing —.5 exposed stalls per unit; .25 enclosed stalls per unit and one exposed stall per employee & company vehicle. Nursing, Convalescent & Rest Home —1 enclosed stall per 4 residents. Based on this requirement the project is to provide 50 enclosed spaces and 83 exposed for a total of 133 spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 126 enclosed and 10 exposed spaces. Residents, employees and visitors can all access the underground parking by an audio /video intercom system. (See pages A8 —A13 of the applicant narrative.) VA A parking study was done by WSB which concludes that the proposed parking would support the uses. The total demand for parking is anticipated to be 125 spaces. Traffic A traffic study was also done by WSB, which concludes that the existing roadways support the proposed uses. (See traffic study on pages A61 A88.) The proposed use would generate less traffic than the approved medical office. The medical office was anticipated to generate 279 trips in the AM peak hour and 216 trips in the PM peak hour. The proposed use would generate 27 trips in the AM peak hour and 40 trips in the PM peak hour. However, as was conditioned in the approvals for Twin City Orthopedic and Fairview Southdale Hospital, should signal improvements be deemed necessary at 65th Street and France Avenue, the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements. This would be a requirement in the Developer's Agreement. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 34 overstory trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The applicant is proposing to plant 43 overstory trees around the perimeter of the site & 200+ understory trees and shrubs. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to plant 22 evergreen trees on the Cornelia Place Apartment site to provide additional screening. (See landscape plan on pages A18 and A37.) Grading & Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable and offered comments. (See page A59 -A60.) Noise Study Based on the issues during preliminary review of this project the chillers have been located on the roof of the building away from the adjacent residential properties to the south and west. They would be screened with a pre - finished metal screen. A noise study has been completed and found that the units would conform to the noise ordinance. (See pages A45 -A49.) Signage Signage would be allowed per the requirements of the Regional Medical District within the Zoning Ordinance Amendment for the PUD. (See attached draft Ordinance.) This would be consistent with the previous PUD approval. 8 PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed rezoning to PUD appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal to rezone the site to PUD is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The building would be pulled up close to the street with a podium height of two- stories, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. The skyway connection adds an element of connectivity not found in the previous project, providing a convenient pedestrian connection for residents of the proposed building and patients of the hospital. 2. Parking would be located under the proposed housing; and would not be visible. The previous approved plans included a large parking ramp setback just 15 feet to the west lot line. This building expands that setback to 43 feet. (See pages A60a -A60d and A43.) Landscaping and balconies are proposed in front along France Avenue. The corner of the building still opens up to France and 65th. The individual store fronts have been eliminated; however, the large store -front type windows remain. Uses on this side of the building would be a coffee shop and fitness room; so activity within these spaces will be .evident from the street. 3. The applicant is proposing to utilize sustainable design principals. Green building practices are suggested, and green roofs are proposed. (See pages A10 - -Al2, of the applicant's narrative that explains how this project meets the above purpose and intent of the PUD Ordinance.) The applicant has also agreed to attempt to meet an energy savings goal of 15% over the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The building includes a podium height of two- stories along the street, which would give pedestrians on the sidewalks in front a feeling that the building is not as tall. Comprehensive Plan contemplates allowing a maximum podium height of two- stories at the street. This two -story podium was also a part of the previously approved medical office plans. 5. The proposed uses would be an even better fit in to the neighborhood. The residential component is consistent with the.high density residential apartments to the south and west. The transitional care is consistent with the medical uses to the north and east. 0 6. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that the traffic generated from the project would not impact the adjacent driveways or intersections. In fact the proposed uses would actually generate less traffic than the previously approved medical building. No additional improvements other than those shown on the site plan would be required to accommodate the site redevelopment. (See traffic study on pages A61— A88.) 7. The PUD ensures that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 8. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. &C, 9. Higher densities are justified for the following reasons: The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the project to the Hospital; Senior Housing would generate less traffic than the approved medical building with retail on the site; existing roadways would support the project; adequate utilities are available to the site; convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. Staff Recommendation Final Rezonin_g to Amend the Planned Unit Development - -3 District & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning to amend the PUD -3 District, and approve the Final Development Plan. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The site layout would be an improvement over a site layout required by standard zoning; the building is brought up to the street, provides podium height, and front door entries toward the street, includes sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street, provides underground parking, and provides an indoor pedestrian connection to the hospital. 3. The design of the building is of a high quality brick, architectural precast concrete, and glass, and is compatible with previously approved medical building. 4. Traffic would be improved in the area by eliminating the right -in and out access on France Avenue. 5.. Based on the traffic study done by WSB, the existing roadways can support the proposed development. Traffic generated by the proposed project would be less than the approved medical building for the site. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented 11 development sites, encourage placement of linear buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or.walkways. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) c. Encourage infill /redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. 7. The project would be connected to the Fairview Hospital by the second level skyway, tying the.project to the Hospital. 8. Convenient transit service is available for workers and residents; the building would include sustainable design principles; public art is proposed; affordable housing is offered; and primary parking would be below grade. Final approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 15, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 27, 2014. • Building elevations date stamped October 15, 2014 12 Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36- 1462 of the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required, landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 15% over the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated November 5, 2014. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 9. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 10. As part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65 h Street and France Avenue. 11. Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. 12. Affordable housing units shall be 10% (10 units) of the assisted and independent units. 13 13. Adoption and compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. PUD Ordinance Recommend the City Council adopt the Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD -3 Zoning District. Deadline for a city decision: No deadline 14 City ®f Edina ��f�e fury � .arar fnswaa !` n ►� f^_ 2I M. 621 __- X12277 �� t_... �..._ 6a06 qL � t 6M mrrare �81t �6+Y 6Jf! wo6 f fJZS410a� ax pre zs'sS� �v1s p2: • p i 6J29tr200 3�Qf 6720 16729 X6328 B11sf- sJ2�,/�,�yi% 6J00 C - 'l3YRt'ELVU�M 63JJ' iJ] 637J 67 Si2S -�N" 1' 0 fav�rn tpltaltE c ro � 2 ;,_„ rI xav+wRrez 4tsfrgrp� !b0 0 H pf! M10 t00 flat 0 "S ow ua9 om 65n 6525 t! BS30 i • x 6Sa9 .7s00 2260 ' am 66J9� TYIt �Q 11f6 I — iJAqlS IJfI -_ ff6t265fL�66r2\ .r Eit6.6�6,n - x E DE2. 2aEs C u 662f— t �0 JIM x 67 �— �iRS --� x� -1109 6712 < f7t6 ~t 67 6"2 BJ 7J0 6725 67'f2- __�2tr� t7 am EJGP 7fS���6200� dBOt 6d�� � r0 6d05y/ ' EE02 f fd006M,g�Yta 690 690 �690f ;0621 a� • �YS5tt _. �.._ iB D'205 SOS f. ��N� PID:3002824140008 • _ 6500 France Ave 5 tia Edina, MN $5435 Al Lo nd HphKghts6 Fedure INuse Number Llhels StrMi Name Labe is City Limits l• CReKt Like Henna O Laws rl Mks Parcels I I City of Edina Logond Haute Ndmber Lghels 15M-rq Streel Name Lele t. City Limlis (_N -2.Av;_z 19 Rf . If: 5.10 A1 Lake Nam- Zra Lakes Parks 2_4 Parcels 2M A-bi P h.t. 1 7 'F'3 uw lit F Ell 41 r is. -vie A\l PID:3002824140003 6500 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 0 F:>� '- =Y � � ��. q - _�_,. ITRD�r�• 4,'•y, t•`tl:� - I. �J ,r y ` ,' I + .� .�'!' «N+ ✓� e_� a �Wl '7 -v- rt mil• /� %. .1r- 1 !$1 ` T; y ,.- _ . � .� L-� G ��, �: 4 f � r�l � I '9 • ace__ t`e A'v, d'n 40 .� � I ! ! '" '� ~ � • �-, � :e �,�,� 7 gt �� i CSI i _ y � , � , - . '�x , is c�: ��Dtscr#,r • q= ,; ' +, * ��r� '! , f � �! ' ' tok E ;+ t ,1 i t ' a ?ifa`WAve 5I' KQA QW, 31C �. _ � ��'',�•, _ �nQ ✓ •��� •` � i } Il�(11 `t y•f , • : ;� 'fit' ell rt • ' frarScelAfid S rer • _ � rz rn � fi . F o^ ,�• y rY rancelAve_jS lilt- !`ems � c'� i � I ,, t7 •� _� !�' 'iA � - �i:l - � „ fq x �/• � � 7 i-c. ; � s� ��� �M e�?fi� ?� � � .� ,� fit. ;;. �I � .�-�' �,\ � • 4 , f1�,� t'IFf -a d:- °titpf '.3.( /fBFf:C$ '-= n'►,ltd�'!` (f _.� �`• 9'; , `�.'� • 9E� r ta iF °t e:plt�jaW R I •� r �=� _� ' '. ' �� EfY`ek�ffV E�fi !'% IF X*iF"s t !. r 'k � :' � Y ;�f.r�f� a': l� 2�. � �4. -¢ a3.� Rte._ � � f 'ry � , , •• % . ` ,;; ���� �rew �, pill •���{ I:�r'�g'W rvti ;� .�� � .r � ��! _i • {� p� `"H,f�(h�sf►t_.�. �"r�� City of Edina t1 +1.�- ai9 RS 6079 6111 62?J suo szrt~ ilt7�z Lagsnd +1.7! ,x 6828 =3 US 6715 6224 6327 fiep 6121 6210 7i Huuse NJm'6eYLahels J3 NT1J 1211 i• 1• bJ7 +t13 ,11 +IJt 6221 01 611 ' Gth 9214 0271 9+21 QP2s s22E 4 .5 tt11 6P72 � �N d �� 9lrart.Name Labels f2t1 47119' 1 R)J 62Y0 dMf ON 6705 mT 6;0! 6Ja 6701 670V 6101 f � . S_. .t City Limits (T @i1 I 1 �? 6700 � Aa5 na z 6109 67110 •1. 6305 670M 1 67Qf 3U5 �1 f" '� �✓ Ct¢eks 26, 1 �� ns tlt t/ ..i Y -.- Lake Names 4: 6i0V mDl �G J 8701 630! WGr t E_''M t ♦..- �' �' 1 92012 t, ti Lakes J2rl j 427i _ �f7 FOR m U17 6711 jj) 6117 67 }2 i T150 rEs Parks F7P2 ttt13 ; ) nu 6112 9. Oh a ®41 6776 j 6705 M7'77 t'p7 ff 4- 7xning 6725 1b! � �-•1 4T18 0 6725 6721 F72T 8720 ,1isC ` ,• APAIA-'- -?a P->t rH,-.q 632/ 6 67Id, 63]6 J%'�j a MDULI..7iipe�apaarnLiNJ iRV 912d V. CJ72 tl11 _i.�Y •l�'♦'�6 yES1 - _ }�t�.VO+f1R� �_'i ?� ✓- J , E363 p'D•1{4h�iCC.r�9iiy (5 �17h -_ )1n- - Yi . �• • ®, veo•7 Nb—JCaaassi66i--t.L11 1 t8t6 ® ff-0�iP�niC>�.•�Gi -actl 6401 •. ♦ _ - - 63`a ,_ O RD'S a:i EadLwlDyi--) • 1T•. -. -- - - _ O 1991 J1R�q,li =J":iJ El DPilO.,IFi>::e7rt:�aa ,l0:atoJ �. ORU.SJ/rrmlt� .•� 3615 •. t D � � - 7 M��iPS =cJ fLri^J el6 -5 =:1 f .—A.•: Fa.1 ± 6 >5 6517 6•Nf iW'fiP�c3R- s�•aE6t 0inc71 ►9LSle9 J3cti�D }.ral J1N _; El � 9- '•'� ! � - 6515 f ♦�r� =•q ':1`•,�; - 65fS _. It 242A, ® 94 Ot�49� ^Sq Yhai i 7` ' • 'SJI O Il1A/M�v151c3"�ilG:9�J :i ya hi+ "s "'! ` ., E _ - 21)09 Amial PAat ON 4M as27 sett • Y1K 6613 ,� w an gas ffin 670T }} A® � 67D9 6M ° on WIN 61'09, Ao ,M 1, i n • '^ 3 -,, fm me,.�.aleza mam • 3 ..t.w A. g s PYa: 300282414000 ,y o a 6500 France Ave S 0 VI Edina, MN 55435 `7rhT• a +�E � ,qu ..for living, lur*g raising families & doing business �r (/; 2008 Comprehensive Plan City of Edina Fuf" ) Land Use Plan 2008 Comprehensive plan Update Data Source: URS nsz -.n Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 j� Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design " ' ?- �; %J 0 Aurora on France 6500 France Avenue South Project Summary May 23, 2014 Afft I (o T �rtRRgTIU� Our development team is looking forward to working with the City of Edina to obtain the final approvals for the Aurora on France project. Everyone will strive to make this building an outstanding addition to this regional medical area. Development Team Architect: Edward Farr Architects, Ed Farr Civil Engineering: Alliant Engineering, Mark Rausch Developer: Mount Development Co., Stephen Michals Owner: Aurora Investments, LLC, Luigi Bernardi Tenant /Operator: Ebenezer Society, Susan Farr Please contact Stephen Michals with any questions on this new building - 952 - 941 -1383. f 6 Site Area = 102,965 sq ft / 2.34 acres Property Guided: RM Regional Medical, amended to include Senior Housing (2013 action) Property Zoned: Planned Unit Development — 3 (2013 action) Proposed Redevelopment: New Senior Care Building, 227,577 sq ft, 5 stories; plus one level of under - building parking. Proposed Occupancy: • Senior Citizen Dwelling Units: o Independent & Assisted Living Units — 100 units • Nursing, Convalescent, Rest Homes: o Transitional Care Suites — 54 units • Memory Care Suites — 34 units • Care Suites — 7 units Proposed Parking: 8 Surface Stalls + 126 Under - Building Stalls = 134 Stalls total. Required parking: 133 Proposed Building Setbacks: North 25' min / 50' max. South 30' on east end / 20' on west end East 25' at street level / 35' at podium level West 44' at grade level / 54' at podium level History: We received approval of a 5 story medical office building and parking ramp in December, 2012 for this property. Aurora Investments has purchased both land parcels. Demolition is complete on the 6500 France Av structure and the 4005 W. 65th St structure. Overview: Ebenezer Society will manage this property for a Specialty Senior Care Housing Facility. We feel that this new use is an improvement to our previously approved use in the following ways: i. The entire block bordered by Valley View Rd on the west, France Av on the east, W. 65th St on the north and W 66th St on the south will become all Housing, for consistency of uses on this block. 2. There will be substantially less traffic generated by this housing development versus the previously approved medical office use — 400 less cars parked on site! 3. There will be approx. 15,000 sq ft less 'roof area' on our building versus the previously approved medical office building and parking ramps roofs. 4. The cubic volume of building enclosure is approx. 25% less than our previously approved medical office building and parking ramp enclosed volume, reducing the visual mass of the structure. Planning Concept: As per our earlier application, the lot combination of the two parcels (6500 France & 4005 W 65th St) is complete; and it offers many advantages to the site layout. We are still adopting an urban, pedestrian - friendly, streetscape along France Ave by bringing the building forward to the street; as well as incorporating a 'podium' design effect by setting the building back above 2nd floor to maintain a comfortably - scaled pedestrian experience. The streetscape includes over -story trees along the right -of -way, a 10 ft wide sidewalk and decorative planters that contain colorful plantings (annuals, perennials and low evergreen shrubs). Vehicular access is available at two driveways along 65th St W — one at the main entry / visitor drop off area; and a second for parking and delivery vehicles on the west side of 0 our site. The City is currently in process to update several intersections along France Avenue at 66th St, 69th St and 70th St. The City's consultant, WSB Associates, has provided the preliminary designs at those intersections for reference. Our proposed project has been refined to incorporate a consistent design in the southwest quadrant of the 65th St and France Avenue intersection including the addition of raised planters between two new relocated pedestrian ramps. There are final traffic signal design details to be done by others that will need to be coordinated with the City Engineer and County regarding the existing traffic signal base, pedestrian crossing buttons and hand -hole relocations, as needed. Building Design: The building design will be an attractive fagade using multiple colors of face brick and warm -toned architectural precast concrete wall panels with a variety of surface finishes. All of the windows will be tinted bronze -tone Low -E glass. Most of the windows will be tan colored prefinished fiberglass windows; and a few of the feature curtainwall windows will be constructed with prefinished champagne color aluminum frames. A small amount of EIFS decorative cornice trim caps the parapet. Multiple fagade planes, parapet projections and exterior balconies offer dimensional relief to the fagade. The main entrance located off of W 65th St serves as a visitor drop -off area for residents, and features a partially covered drop - off canopy for weather protection. The NE building corner at France Ave and W 65th St has its distinctive glazed crown, backlit at night, to provide a regional point of identity for the building. The corner plaza area will offer outdoor seating, plus a public art piece, and also coordinates with the City's initiative to upgrade the pedestrian experience at these corners. The plaza will have decorative concrete surfacing treatment, planting areas and bollards behind the curb. Visual Screening for the Adjacent Properties: We will supplement the already mature landscape buffer between Point of France and our site with new trees and bushes along our south yard. The ash trees along this borderline with Point of France are approx. 35' — 50' tall, providing excellent screening for most months of the year. On the west, facing Cornelia Place Apartments, we are employing significant screening strategies to our garage entrance and service area as follows: 1. We covered the loading dock area with a decorative roof structure to mitigate views into the loading area. 2. We moved the HVAC chiller equipment away from the loading area to minimize any noise for the apartments. 3. We recessed the EXIT garage door in the NW corner so it will be visually screened. 4. We provided a visual screen wall and roof cover at our ENTRY garage door in the SW corner. 5. We are planting 22 evergreen trees on Cornelia Place Apartments property to allow that owner to strategically place those trees where they feel they are best used. In addition, we will be landscaping the property line with a dense row of evergreen trees to provide a visual buffer. 6. We will limit the hours of the loading dock deliveries to the hours of 9am to 4pm (unless otherwise coordinated with neighboring buildings). Parking: There are 8 exterior surface stalls at the main entrance drop -off, used primarily for short -term visitor parking. The remainder of the parking, 126 stalls, is under the building in an enclosed level that has security access control. Residents, employees and visitors can all access this under - building parking level; via an audio /video intercom system. Refer to the Parking Calculation page of our submittal for parking calculations. HM Service Court: Deliveries are quite infrequent for this building, estimated as follows: • Garbage & Recycling pick up - 3 times a week, max. Short trucks only. • Food Service deliveries - US Foods (2 times a week) and Bix 6 times a week. Periodically, they may add one delivery per week for special needs. • Medical and Linen Supply trucks — up to 3 times a week. Step van vehicles, typically. • Pharmaceutical deliveries - typically weekly, but we require daily when needed. Small vehicles only (car or van). • Resident Move -in / Move -outs — varies, but a 1 to 3 per week is average. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain: The property is currently encumbered by two public utilities - an existing 12" ductile iron water main and 12" ductile iron sanitary sewer in the south quarter of the property. The existing water main and sanitary sewer referenced serve other properties and thus the continuity of those mains is required. There will be no disruption to the adjacent roadways. An existing 8" sanitary service line that previously served the 4005 and 6500 buildings will be removed, capped and abandoned at the west property line. A connection will be made to the existing 12" sanitary sewer main along the southern property line of the 6500 France Ave property to service the developments proposed building. The existing 12" water main loop cutting through the site will be relocated and re- routed to the south side of the property parallel to the sanitary sewer main. An 8" water service for the development is proposed from a tee off the re- routed 12 ". A new hydrant is proposed to service the south side of the building. The proposed service will be routed along the east side of the proposed building and connect to the NE corner of the building. The existing Point of France building south of the development site currently receives water service from the existing 12" trunk watermain within the proposed development site. It is planned that the new watermain will be installed, tested and operational before the existing Point of France service is disconnected and connected to the relocated trunk watermain. This should reduce the length of time required to have water service disrupted to the Point of France. Stormwater Management: The proposed storm water management storage facilities meet the requirements of Nine Mile Creek Watershed and the City of Edina. The three primary requirements that have been met are: 1. Volume retention onsite equivalent to 1" of runoff over the entire proposed site impervious surface. (Accomplished via a series of rain gardens and an underground infiltration chamber system). 2. Water quality volume from entire site equivalent to runoff from the 2" type II storm event with 25 years of planned sediment storage. (Retention volume counts towards WQ volume and remainder accomplished via the rain gardens and additional underground infiltration chamber). 3. Discharge rate control shall be provided so the proposed conditions do not exceed existing conditions for the 2, 10, and 100 yr storm events. The proposed site plan reduces the amount of impervious surface by 10.5 %, reducing proposed discharge rates. The rain gardens and infiltration chamber also contain the entire 2 -yr event for their contributing watersheds. Al The proposed plan is to maintain the same point of storm water discharge from the properties as is currently present. A private storm sewer collection system will be routed from north to south through the western portion of the site collecting the majority of site runoff. The storm sewer will drain to an offline pretreatment chamber to the proposed underground storage system at the western end of the site which will ultimately outlet to the City pond south of the property. An agreement to construct the storm sewer discharge point to the City pond will be coordinated with the Point of France property owners. Storm water runoff from the south side of the building will sheet drain to a series of two proposed rain gardens. The rain gardens will overflow for larger events to an existing 15" CMP culvert that currently serves the property. Landscape Design Strategies: The landscape design provides a mix of over -story, coniferous and ornamental trees, shrubs and perennials to create a vibrant display of color and foliage. The four existing Honeylocust trees along France Avenue and seven of the boulevard Ash trees along West 65th Street will be replaced. Raised curbed planters are to be provided along France Avenue that will be planted with colorful, annual and perennial flowers. Coordination will occur with City staff to provide landscaping along France Avenue that will be consistent with the work proposed by the City at other intersections. The perimeter of the building will be planted with a mixture of plant types to soften and compliment the building architecture. The building's service area and parking entrance will also be screened by existing and proposed conifers on the west and southwest side. The diversity of plantings will provide color variety and year round interest. In addition, the project is proposing to provide a green roof system on top, covering approximately 7,823 sf. This sustainable initiative will help reduce the heat island effect, reduce stormwater runoff quantity, as well as providing a nicer view down on our roof from the residents of Point of France building. Noise Ordinance Compliance: We are proposing two outside air - cooled chillers for heat rejection, located under the crown feature on the NE corner of our roof. They will be visually screened with an overhead metal trellis structure,. and not seen from the public way at all. An acoustical analysis has been performed and attached to demonstrate compliance with zoning noise ordinance limits. Site Lighting: Decorative wall mounted lighting along France Av and W 65th St frontages, and around the main entry area. Decorative city sidewalk light poles, as prescribed by City Engineering Dept, along the W 65th St and France Av sidewalks. Resident unit balcony wall lights will be low- wattage down lights to provide minimum level of illumination. The glazed crown feature at rooftop level at the corner of France Av and W 65th St will be backlit at night for a nice glow. Site Signage: Building name / address at corner of France & W 65th St., and address above front entry. Directional signs at both entries along W 65thSt. Hours of Use: 24/7 resident use. Green Building Practices: Throughout all phases of the project - Design, Construction and Operation, we will use best practices of environmental awareness. Ebenezer is fully educated on Reduce - Recycle -Reuse operations. We have a Green Building Practices Narrative with our submission. We have retained our green roof area, which can be enjoyed by residents on the north side of Point of France. X( Community Benefits from the New Project The previous buildings, parking lots and landscaping had substantial deferred maintenance problems. The property is ready for a fresh, new development. 2. This building provides senior and rehab service to support the regional medical presence of the SW suburbs. This is.consistent with the City Guide Plan. 3. The building is sized to have a critical mass of services to allow cross referrals among other senior facilities in Edina. This is a key factor for the success of each specialized service area. The building will offer cost effective services to seniors as a strategic support to the hospital. 4. Edward Farr Architects is known for creating special building design features. The focal point will be the glass and brick detail of the main entry corner creating a Gateway Building to the Southdale area. Numerous surface changes occur on each side of the building to create interest and shadow elements. 5. We are supporting the pedestrian environment along France Avenue with flower gardens and sitting areas. Accent lighting table seating will make this area a pleasant visual experience. 6. . The skyway will link the building to the hospital for visitor and patient services. 7. Green Building Practices will be implemented for the three phases: building design, construction phase and long term operation of the clinics. The General Contractor has compiled a summary of the Green Practices we will pursue for each phase of the project. Periodic reports during construction will demonstrate our progress. 9. A portion of the building roof will have a vegetated green roof, with native wild flowers and sedum, to enhance the view down onto the roof from the neighboring Point of France building, as well as reducing our heat island effect and improving our stormwater runoff quantity. Annual reports will show the reduction in the heat island effect along with estimates of water volume enhanced. 10. There will be ongoing efforts to evaluate methods and new technology for our employees to: — Reduce consumption, Re -use materials, and Recycle waste. The benefit to the building will be reduced operating expenses and good stewardship of our business resources. Reports will be provided on the quantities of recycling. 11. Alternative transportation is a key element of any project. A tangible goal will be to reduce the number of cars coming to the building which will reduce the parking stalls required to service the building. We have provided several successful alternate transportation systems: Scooter, motorcycle, bike parking will be an enclosed space that is secure, well lit, and air tempered. We want employees and residents to know they are recognized for their efforts. Employees may participate in the ZAP chip monitor system which will provide a monthly printout of number of rider days. There will be a calculation of carbon footprint poundage saved to each participant. The MTC #6 bus, line services multiple stops for the building. Additional routes around Southdale are 515, 538, 539, 578, 579, 684. 12. There will be over 52 staff positions in the building. In addition, there will be 40 -60 construction jobs over 12 months. 13. Storm water management will be improved through rate control and water quality, including our green roof. The current site has direct, unrestricted runoff. There is almost 13% less hard surface area in the new plan than the current buildings, which means more green space for the community. 14. The new development is using existing utilities and roads in the community. Urban planning considers this good stewardship to reuse existing sites with current infrastructure. 15. The corner plaza will have an area for a significant piece of art. We are planning a special commissioning for this feature. AURORA ON FRANCE May 23, 2014 Enclosed Exposed Enclosed Exposed # of # of Parking Parking Parking Parking Units Beds Parking Calculation Required Required Provided Provided Nursing Home uses per zone PRD -5 Traditional Care /Skilled Nursing Licensed Beds 54 63 1 enclosed stall per 4 residents 16 Memory Care 34 40 1 enclosed stall per 4 residents 10 Care Suites 7 7 1 enclosed stall per 4 residents 2 Subtotal 95 110 28 0 Senior Citizen Dwelling uses per zone PSR -4 Independent and .5 exposed stalls per unit 50 .25 enclosed stalls per unit 25 Assisted Living 100 Employees 1 exposed per employee = 29 1 29 1 enclosed per management = 1 Subtotal 100 26 79 Totals 195 54 79 126 8 Total Required 133 Total Provided 134 7710 Golden Triangle Drive Eden Prairie Minnesota 55344 Tel: 952.943.9660 Fax: 952-943-9665 im- edfarrarch.com May 30, 2014 Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Aurora on France 6500 France Av S. Redevelopment Final Development Plan — Supplemental Information Cary, This letter itemizes the design changes from the Preliminary Development Plan approved in July 2013 to the current Final Development Plan Application submitted May 23, 2014. • Slight reduction in building square footage (approx. 2,000 sf less). • Slight decrease to west side yard setback (3'/z ft + / -), but increase in green space by elimination of concrete sidewalk in that west yard. • Minor change to senior housing unit counts. • Modified required parking and provided updated parking counts (still compliant). • Refinements to front plaza (corner of France & 65th) to coordinate grades, skyway columns and planters. • Interior floor plan refinements, all floors. • Refined roof plan showing all incidental plumbing vents, roof drains and exhaust vents. • Refined exterior elevations with updated window pattern and HVAC grille locations. m The existing boulevard-trees along France Ave. are now scheduled for removal and replacement; we would have been excavating too close to their root structures, causing significant root damage. ® We completed the exterior design for the skyway crossing W. 65th St. ® On the west side, the vehicle entrance /exits to the lower level have been redesigned to split the ingress and egress locations for better traffic circulation. We've discussed this design change with our Cornelia Place neighbor; and receive his approval. In return, we have offered additional evergreen trees to be planted off -site on their property, now 22 in total, to further screen their views. The final location of the trees will be field identified in coordination with Cornelia Place representation. Further, architectural wing walls with an overhang have been added to the new southwest vehicle entrance to screen that overhead door. ® The west delivery area has been redesigned with a 4' foot "dropped" truck delivery pavement, so that we could build the overhead dock structure that screens this area, while achieving truck clearances. The grading plan has been revised to lower the delivery area and lower the west driveway entrance to accommodate the elevation change. A small retaining wall has been added along the west side of the driveway for the same reason. Relocated the water service connection to northeast building corner. ® Relocated / revised the sanitary sewer connection to the 12" trunk sewer along the south side of the site. The existing 9" sewer to the west will now be no longer used and abandoned. Added a second rain garden system on the south side of the building to provide additional above ground infiltration volume. The proposed underground storm water management system was reconfigured to use a `proprietary' style. design. A lower profile storage system was required as a result of the lowered truck dock. If you have any questions about these design changes, please feel free to contact me at 952.943.9660. Thank you, Sincerely, ]Edward Farr Architects, Inc. Edward A. Farr, AIA President C: Steve Michals, Mount Development Co Luigi Bernardi, Aurora Investments, LLC Page 2 e EBENEZER 6900 France BuffWng Town Center Offerings & Activities Ebenezer would like to make several common areas of the building accessible to the residents of Point of France. The rooms and activities are designed for all residents in the new building and we welcome your participation in many of the services outlined below, **Please provide the front desk a 24 hour reservation notice for the selected activity** ❖ Theater — 40 reclining seats with a custom screen create a special theater atmosphere with evening star lights in the ceiling that reminds of the outside "drive -in" movies, Presentations will include movies and cable offerings, Popcorn machine and concessions are available! ❖ Convenience Gift Shop —The main floor will have a retail convenience store with cards, gifts and partial service pharmacy. ❖ Dining Room — There will be a 160 -seat dining room overlooking the south terrace, which will have an upscale traditional theme and servers taking tableside orders. Lunch or dinner may be purchased off the menu. A full -time chef will create daily specials and each month will feature special ethnic dinner parties. ❖ Bistro — Our northeast corner will have an internet caf6 open to the plaza with seating around the special flower gardens and pedestrian way. Offerings will be premium coffee, ice cream, light meals and other refreshments. ❖ Community Room —This room is used for music events or special lectures of interest. There will be frequent OSHER Life Long Learning lectures from the University of Minnesota. ❖ Beauty Shop — Hair Stylist will have a daily schedule and will offer an array of salon services by appointment only. *AII Offerings and Prices will be subject to change without notice. 5118113 AIS4 �+ EBENEZER Part of Fairview Health Services Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 May 315', 2013 Dear Mr. Teague, Ebenezer 2722 Park Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 -1009 Tel: 612- 874 -3460 Fax: 612- 874 -3465 The 6500 France Avenue location is a gateway into Edina, providing Ebenezer an opportunity to build a senior living community offering Independent Living, Assisted Living, Care suites, Transitional Care Suites, and Observation Rooms for Ebenezer's nearby affiliate Fairview Southdale Hospital and the Twin City Orthopedics center. The new facility would feature Healthsense, state -of -the -art technology, and offer the following: a heated, underground parking garage, full - service salon, exercise room, massage therapist, bistro, club lounge, full- service dining room, gift shops, library/computer lounge with Wi -Fi, theatre and a concierge service, bus lines and bike paths for employees, pharmacies, and shopping. It also faces nature and the take, providing residents with activity views and beautiful scenery. Ebenezer is looking forward to developing in and partnering with Edina. Thank you, Susan Farr glSd DHS- 5357 -ENG 12 -12 f i 11111111 What is the Elderly Waiver Program? The Elderly Waiver (EW) program funds home and community -based services for people age 65 and older who are eligible for Medical Assistance (MA) and require the level of care provided in a nursing home, but choose to reside in the community. The Minnesota Department of Human Services operates the EW program under a federal waiver to Minnesota's Medicaid State Plan. Counties, tribal entities and health plan partners administer the program. What types of services are available? Covered services include: d Adult day service © Case management ® Chore services ® Companion services ® Consumer- directed community supports ® Home health aides ® Horne - delivered meals ® Homemaker services ® Licensed community residential services (customized living services or 24 -hour customized living services, family and corporate foster care, residential care) Environmental accessibility adaptations A Personal care o Respite care ® Skilled nursing ® Specialized equipment and supplies ® Personal Emergency Response Systems ® Training and support for family caregivers • Transitional supports • Nonmedical transportation Who is eligible? a Those eligible for the EW are 65 or older, eligible for MA and need nursing home level of care as determined by the Long -Term Care Consultation process. 22 The EW service cost for an individual cannot be greater than the estimated nursing home cost for that same individual. ® The person chooses to receive home and community -based services instead of nursing facility services. Al�c http: / /uui.gov /dhs How many people? How many dollars? In fiscal year 2012, EW served 31,320 people at a total cost of approximately $311,817,288. Ninety -two percent of EW participants receive their services through a managed care organization. The managed care program options include the Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO) program, an integrated Medicaid /Medicare health and long -term care program; and Minnesota Senior Care Plus (MSC +), a Medicaid health and long -term care option. The average monthly EW participant population for fiscal year 2012 was 22,357 with an average monthly cost of $1,504 under fee - for - service purchase and $1,124 per participant per month under managed care. What alternatives exist for people who are eligible for EW? Probable alternatives to EW include Medicaid - certified skilled nursing facilities and certified board - and -care homes. The average cost of these alternative settings is $5,054 per person, per month, less a resident contribution toward cost of care. Where can I learn more about the EW program? The EW program is described in Minnesota Statutes 25613.0915. Where can I learn more about managed care for seniors? More information.about managed care for seniors is on the DHS website. How can I enroll? Contact your county's social services or public health department. If you are already on Medical Assistance and enrolled in a health.plan, you should contact your health plan. How do I obtain more information as a provider of home and community -based services? See the Elderly Waiver and Alternative Care chapter of the Minnesota Health Care Provider Manual. Call the Senior LinkAge Line® at 800 - 333 -2433 for more information about the program. Log on to www.MinnesotaHelp.info for more information. MinnesotaHeIp.info is an online directory of services designed to help people in Minnesota identify resources such as human services, infonnation and referral, financial assistance, and other forms of aid and assistance within Minnesota. This information is available in accessible formats for individuals with disabilities by calling 651- 431 -2400, toll -free 800 - 747 -5484, or by using your preferred relay service. For other information on disability rights and protections, contact the agency's ADA coordinator. http: / /mn.gov /dhs Final Development Plan -- .•,< ILL Z ,� WIN Aurora on Fracce mile _ _ VIM •�fr''1_� 1 lr TABLE OF CONTENTS � L1: COVERSHEET JP2: REGIONALMAP JP3: SITEPLAN JP4: RENDERINGS ��,-�����yy��\� JP5: RENDERINGS 1P6: RENDERINGS JP7: A5.1 ELEVATION IPB: A5.2ELEVATION JP9: SCREENING STRATEGIES IPIO: VIEWS FROM CORNELIA PLp.j.yp11: BLDG H7 MEASUREMENTS O "Y 6 Ito t Page 1 6500 France Avenue October 14, 2014 EDWARD FARR AURORA ON FRANCE AURORA ARCHITECTS INC lnvcstmcnts, LLC MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. m r Row, i- Hw.y 62 • i ,a � Y P � 1 u11111rrV L Y r. 1.,,. � Y ! "i• �riiil {'G��',iti'es•O�rtfi�pe� d� (��,,ti„ � ' �11 _ ; �..�'• "rte_ �F s n '!"rte °ss `�r � •r' IA 1 ( F ' . _ -Jr•rri1, � I_ r� � 1 Southdale^ edical Cent *r •OCR ,�,� ti0�4 W 66:th St W 6• t t Page 2 Regional Map October 14, 2014 EDWARD FARR FRANCE AURORA AURORA ARCHITECTS INC ON °, " ° °` °`5'`LC MOUNT DEVELOPMEKr CO. aC Site Plan 6500 France Avenue ARCHITECTS INC AURORA ON FRANCE AURORA Invcsnucn[s, LLC r;-s' 16 -ok Page 3 October 14, 2014 r rrm i Ih. r- rrr"MrT nTrtm r. r y -'1Ti- �l '", IrI�7�7 IT -'1*1 -IR - iI6l - Ziieai�al��iiiii r View Looking at Front Entry -SF- 9� a View Looking Southeast Page 5 October 14, 2014 EDWARDFARR AURORA ON FRANCE AURORA ARCHITECTS INC MOU,rr DEVELOPM. CO. View Looking Northeast View Looking at Terrace C,vl Page 6 October 14, 2014 EDWARD FARR AURORA ON FRANCE AuxoizA ARCHITECTS INC l„vet „ncncs, LLC _. MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. T P 5 W ,Ol R IOU 0,TO 9 � 0 4 Ar� HMV, O Y157' -0' {IH Fl ON 0!2940jU`"- ....... -- a T77 ,�\ IT T IT T T �? IT T IT T T IT IT IT III ■ © 1 °1 ■ ° 1 ■ °1 �, ■ ■I ■ I I A �� IOANY THN ■ ■° °3' ■■ ■ ■00■ ■ 01 ma EI El' V 1■° Alms ��i ■'� I ■ 1■i��1 ■ T IT T T IT IT T T 7 T T T T TP T IT T STAIR BEY TO ELEVATOR ELEVATOR 11 1B 16 8 ROW BEYOND r "I"AY BBY*= 110111WAY BEYOND 11 l O 11 v 11 1B 18 - ° ■ 1.100 ° ■ I I ° II 00111,■°�I 1 I ■ ° ° A C, ° ■ � - ■-I ■ 1 ■1 ■■ Moll ■ ■11 ■■11■ ■1I■ 11_ ■ 'E, ��Emf I IM . ° 17 r +7 pNn. y 1 supilr1i.1 W IM y L�rensa0 nrrNlr I FACE BRICK RI -FIELD Z FACE BRICK •2 - BASE 3 FACE BRICK M3 - ACCENT R EIFG 0 PRECAST (PC) CGRNICC BABRE.ZE TINTED CLASS IN ALUMINUM FRAMES BB BRONZE TINTED GLASS IN PREPINISHED FIBERGLASS FRAMER 7 ARCHL PC CONC R2 • ACID ETCH TO MATCH BLACK 42 B DECORATIVE WALL LIGHT 0 G All CROWN . SIGN AGE /ADDRESS NUMBERS 11 PREFINISHEU METAL PANELS 12 PREFOOSH 0 ALUM GUARDRAIL 13 BALCONIES - CONCRETE 14 O.H. DOOR PAINTED 15 LOUVERS A PNEFINISHLD METAL TRIM 17 WALL MOUNTED AREA LIGHTING IB PHEFINISHED HVAC GRILL- 19 M13CELLANEOUS SIGNAGL Page 7 NORTH /SOUTH AURORA u.c ELEVATIONS October 14, 2014 /n�Hnvnlau. " 1 �� AlDUar DEyFA.aan:N-ral. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OC� 1 �o In al FRANCE AVENUE SODTH EDINA. MINNESOTA - i2: ale 5� Page 7 NORTH /SOUTH ELEVATIONS October 14, 2014 - 13.025 A5.1 In PAYAPEL .. B.mr -a• 0H(Xk - 157' -0' AFLVUYL 1I1ZZ11'' p' X51 FLOQL., •1w 'U" a QI W g� X T T T T Y T T T T QEAST ELEYAi ION as 7. one o a w v 0 T T T T T T T T T SKYWAY { CROWN ld 9 FAR BEYOND r tt m - 1 3 rto> 1 �1 ■ o�o ■ 1 ' 1 ■ mill ■ �'son on ■ 1111 ■ I.- V i V �% IEIDR00.K ` V SIGN EAST /WEST NDi ENTER SIGN i6'ADipON Sim, slat page 8 -111, rA.A.ELEVAT. IONS Tei.r rA.wi « €` +AT October 14, 2014 13.025 A5.2 �DDWHitvn iar lH7 N'Dl r y`e� i�r�ivw°in':n r E.... A. Farr oni DD. ..,6362 1 PACE BRICK •1 - FIELD 2 FACE BRICK R2 - BASE 3 FACE BRICK 43 - ACCENT EIFS B PRECAST (PC) CORNICE pA BRONZE TINTED CLASS IN ALUMW0,11M FRAMES OB BRONZE TINTED GLASS IN PREFINISHED FIBERGLASS FRAMES 7 ARCH 'L PC CONC 02 - ACID ETCH TO MATCH BRICK •2 E DECORATIVE WALL LIGHT B GLASS CROWN N SIONAGEIADORESS NUMBERS 11 PREFWISHED METAL PANELS 12 PREFINISHED ALUM GUARDRAIL 13 BALCONIES - CONCRETE N O.H. DOOR - PAINTED 15 LOUVERS 1E PREFHU SHIM METAL TRIM 11 WALL MOUNTED AREA LIGHTING 1E PREFH,ISHED HVAC GRILLE iB MISCELLANEOUS SIGNAGE AURORA ■ Iur..une L LX an1mTDEwnPala.T m. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 8500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH \ INA. MIN NESOTA 1 G • Iuwa iii_ cv�_ p� V i V �% IEIDR00.K ` V SIGN EAST /WEST NDi ENTER SIGN i6'ADipON Sim, slat page 8 -111, rA.A.ELEVAT. IONS Tei.r rA.wi « €` +AT October 14, 2014 13.025 A5.2 View Notes Cornelia Residents no longer have a view of an Office Rooftop (previous con- dition) nor the view of a Parking Ramp (previously approved condition). 36' to 76' (varies) , 54' to Podium New evergkeens planted ■ off -site for Opt. neighbors. Cornelia Place �.�! ■ ■ 1 1 ■■ Screening Strategies West End 1 . ��� 160. ���• Page 9 October 14, 2014 EDWARD FARR AURORA ON FRANCE AURORA — ARCHITECTS INC '"°csuncnrs. LL( Wl'�DEVELOPMENT — MO, CO. yl . 7IIII arm NI IIIII illy i 17 ;'e: �6p�p .M� 3, r .i iilG�i iG n N NNI +`� - — '' i;� ■�G�uii - -- --- �.A� s... M m_ I ui nm _ �i� �NI� M! 11 59.0' Above 1 st Floor 61.5' Above 1 st Floor = 942.5' = 945.0' = 59.4' Above Curb = 61.2' Above Curb = 59.0' Above Grade = 60.5' Above Grade ■ 71.5' Above 1 st Floor = 954.0' = 70.5' Above Curb = 70.0' Above Grade I r ��� 41 • �' � , '. Top of Curb Along France Ave 71.5' Above 1 st Floor 883.5 Building Grade 884.5 Building Grade 1st Floor = 0.0 = 883.5' Note: Existing Grade Elevation 954.0' 883.TTo -of Curb 883.8 Top of Curb 884.5 Existing Grade taken at location of new building = 70.5' Above Curb 883.0 Existing Grade 884.0 Existing Grade footprint = 70.0' Above Grade P East Elevation - 6500 France Avenue - Primary Architectural Front 59.0' Above 1 st Floor = 942.5' = 59.5' Above Curb = 59.0' Above Grade oil 62.0' Above 1 st Floor = 945.6' = 65.00' Above Curb = 62.00' Above Grade 61.5' Above 1 st Floor = 945.0' = 65.2' Above Curb = 61.5' Above Grade Ell 59.0' Above 1 st Floor = 942.5' = 64.5' Above Curb = 59.5' Above Grade ❑ ❑❑Ei♦ I ■ ° ON -<\ \o� ,� k�c NEV. E 11 Ilgi-ol IN SEEM IN IN Nil I11 ■01L��° ■ ■ ■■��■■��4������•� _ � rvuic ilicic is dJ' u. inwn Al ri Cr 7 - -~.i and landscape betwee building 4 .� -.I ._ 1"', „ „ , , and curb here. _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ 883.5' Buildin Grade 883.5' Building Grade 883.5' Buildin Grade 883.0' Building Grade 879.0' _ Buildin Grade 883.0' Top of Curb 880.5' Top of Curb I 879.8' To of Curb 878.0' To of Curb 876.8' To of Curb 884.0 Existing Grade 879.0 Existing Grade / 878.0 Existing Grade 876.0 Existing Grade 876.0 Existing Grade North Elevation - 65th Street West Approximate Center Top of Curb Along 65th St. W. Line of Building EDWARD FARR Aurora on France - Building Height Measurements Page 11 ARCHITECTS NC October 14, 2014 >wurr uuvunrNtxr cu. Finish materials in shaded area Finish materials in sunny area 0 Fiberglass Window Frame ! ® Face Brick #1 ® Bronze Tinted Glass Champagne Aluminum Window Frame t� Prefinished Metal Panels O Face Brick #3 ODecorative Precast Concrete z Face Brick #2 ' Corresponds to Elevation Sheets it O A5.1 and A5.2 Finish Materials May 23, 2014 EDWARD FARR AURORA ON FRANCE ��, "JtO12'� ' ` = ARCHITECTS INC " " " " " " "�'' mouorrDF.rVMOPMLVrco. — Site Area • 102,065 sq ft / 2.34 acres Building Setbacks: �V • Nursin Home. 110 Reside -•^ • 28 stalls (enclosed) 1/4 Residents North 25 feet Senior Citizen Dwelling 'IS Property Guide egional Medical South 20 feet Resident 25 stalls (enclosed) .25 /unit 2 East 25 feel /35 feat ++ Resident 50 stalls (exposed) .5 / unit �tV A. West 44 feet / 54 feet ++ Staff 20 stalls (exposed) 1 / employee P IAVIEW SOUTHDALE Property Zoned= PuU-3 + AVEMENT Management 1 Stall (anGlOSed) 1 PARKING RAMP G� • second setback number is above podium level Required 54 enclosed / 70 exposed 133 stalls Proposed Redevelopment: New Senior Care Building T Q Proposed Perkin P g' 126 enclosed / 10 exposed P - 134 stalls 5 stories. 227.577 gross sq ft + I Not including 1 level of underground parking (55,554 GSF) OUT I OUT I q SKYWAY Proposed Occupancy: I 5 -STORY SENIOR COLUMN Senior Citizen Dwelling Units Independent Living Units, Assisted Living Units (TJ Nursing, Convalescent, Rest Homes _ I ._ Transitional Care Suites, Memory Care Suites, Care Suites o 65TH STREET WEST + a• WIDE GREY CONCRETE SIDEWALK WEST OF MAN ��- �_ - -_— ENTRY A. Farr I °0. N °.16361 OBAWINGAkAE1( - - -_ —_. AL.1 MOei[CIIW!L.HIERM..._ -._ __EEO s,ERm Senn crt.AWauTL_ V I a,a C1.0. Sp4lllgtllNW�FI9_PLeR_.- _ WAS- 010 7� SKYWAY IN" Ir1 p�pRb'AIS aKYW O — AOUNTFD �COLM IT JOINT OF FR //� TCOOLING OWERS 1 Q./ ak ak OI ID' I A1� n• L E I' Q I¢I ILZ 55.0_LIYU�e1lE 0.1N �__� GO. A_09WLW._FAP.61aN.0.011ERLSOtliNA ELZsIrE.111N_r.lJ!.iY}.E SIRi. _ __. 4.i 3(EW4S42!iM4 __. AT�LT�ltED ROW Nf I.Jfg,4 s1M.1_. ■ AURORA MWMD� CO. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9600 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA 'HITECTURAL E PLAN )25 AM I r 54. A PDOIU I A.y + RECESSED GARAGE 2 H, EXIT DONS LOWER LEVEL O O �tV A. 25' Q' + AVEMENT G� T Q v� I q = 5 -STORY SENIOR HOUSING BUILDING f G° + Al ;Il 5' LANDSCAN ` f CAST N PLACE TENANT FIREPLACE CONTAINER ORNAMENTAL CONCRETE WITH GARDENS DECORATIVE f 19 \Tb +TIh_� LOADING MIIKIG DOCK PATTERN AM COLOR amsev RDOF OVER GARAGE ENTRY Y aa'•(y T c UFO Op DD 0_0 w a v R 0 8 m p J U OENAMWT GAZEBO RALIM - — — RAN GAROH6 SCAPE PLAN TENNIS COURTS POINT OF FRANCE LOADING ZONE POINT OF FRADELIVERY UCE DELIVERY TPK JOINT OF FR //� TCOOLING OWERS 1 Q./ ak ak OI ID' I A1� n• L E I' Q I¢I ILZ 55.0_LIYU�e1lE 0.1N �__� GO. A_09WLW._FAP.61aN.0.011ERLSOtliNA ELZsIrE.111N_r.lJ!.iY}.E SIRi. _ __. 4.i 3(EW4S42!iM4 __. AT�LT�ltED ROW Nf I.Jfg,4 s1M.1_. ■ AURORA MWMD� CO. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9600 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA 'HITECTURAL E PLAN )25 AM e'C A, mnx9noN AT wA1A (TYP) �I I I � I IIii I I � I Ill[I 8 1 I ^ , to 1 I i I 1 rl 1 I I I I 1 I � y 1 � II :It I I i 1 1 I I - _I — EIDSnND 97 TD PARRIxc RAMP fsTREEr (PER Utt OETAIU `-s• 9DEnux s' suEwAJx T STEPS w/ M NG TTV (e- LASERS) SEE M0X auEJxxc DYEPxulc OFPRCCCCn LURE OSTTWFAD DOOR N UNDEAa1WND PNWNc AOCF UNE (ABOVE) / /' B /sNEEr uGHT - COHSRa= PED PAMP 1 I'D i.EUJ -- C , E h- . P25' 6' mDE CHDSSWAU( SrPPWD 10 1 aTf/CCUNtt 'NrICfl a BUB I - _ PEDWtEM . AM AA- E1DrnH0 HAD.x TO - I -- MATCH PROPOSED 90EWAlA I.- .E GPOSSWAIJf SNIPI - y1� _� FIFYATON TO WTCH CWNtt PFAUIPf P O- � ----- - - - - PRR OPOSED CONSCYUCi Pm MNP I �------- RmS CONCRETE I P� WAlrf MEMORY CARE GARDEII (APOYE DIX ) �o B R il� PVJTnA D PS-T ur R+.siT I CAC I I II' • ' 11 I 1CHµlC /LDTMT SBWD PUN) ` (SEE 65TH STREET WEST M ANO DAMP oa. 11 R 11 o„'Mm wxs�iR'w•Rrox, wnlLLixE vnwEa N.s am�i wuPNiIIm° Aw t I-BE tavuwAY SiPRI Ba- Ut C. MW „➢PV556 DuAwG Ca61RYGtwMRPfAtlD. s tN _ m AE 1/[ ukx wrNwOx Alxr 1 tw NA BE B sswv v s 1 ,nua x� xotm f I �rB I I 1 �wq I SNP 9BN � !rb // SIFPS CONCRETE 9 pe -_ -T TRW[ 1 -1 (]o'RJ07 PENOYE PgVFMENT MAPNNG (tER NPN APROrQ (/g(J .VST FIOSBNO NANONOIE TO NATCH PAOPOSm 90EAALa( PEO DAMP MATfW TC /WT AT BAU[ SLOP SIEN �J PIB' ' � ronrs iraM"Sw•Ax1i c° ro oill�ow«m° r15t o0.vR A9 A R6Ua 0T nlaE Inrmvl F1F[AnON (SEE CMOWC PLAN) R1 -1 (]0'x]07 -� { CONCRETE AcCEiS'•1= Rei2 CAC (rYP) ` APflON RIO' PED NAMP ABW TC /OUT AT WNH (SEE CPAOWC PLAN) CONCRETE ALEESS APRON Rt0' { • PTO' I AgJU I I [. e. r r -BNEET UWT .A T 1 (PER Utt OETAIU `-s• 9DEnux s' suEwAJx T STEPS w/ M NG TTV (e- LASERS) SEE M0X auEJxxc DYEPxulc OFPRCCCCn LURE OSTTWFAD DOOR N UNDEAa1WND PNWNc AOCF UNE (ABOVE) / /' B /sNEEr uGHT - COHSRa= PED PAMP 1 I'D i.EUJ -- C , E h- . P25' 6' mDE CHDSSWAU( SrPPWD 10 1 aTf/CCUNtt 'NrICfl a BUB I - _ PEDWtEM . AM AA- E1DrnH0 HAD.x TO - I -- MATCH PROPOSED 90EWAlA I.- .E GPOSSWAIJf SNIPI - y1� _� FIFYATON TO WTCH CWNtt PFAUIPf P O- � ----- - - - - PRR OPOSED CONSCYUCi Pm MNP I �------- RmS CONCRETE I �` -� MEMORY CARE GARDEII (APOYE DIX ) �o B R il� PVJTnA D PS-T ur R+.siT I CAC I I II' • ' 11 ..e ._ ti:,i ilw ,1[ii'_ • CONCRETE LOADWO I uo• N _) '' i y N, rN4 ,•M'IAfE A JT •llf 4A.WPxT --i .i+ y ly ,`_ wr { PAD �Y 1 _TIV (�jP ..xn^n�u.. ss.u�ix- mi�.e_ �-- M ANO DAMP oa. 11 R 11 o„'Mm wxs�iR'w•Rrox, wnlLLixE vnwEa N.s am�i wuPNiIIm° Aw t I-BE tavuwAY SiPRI Ba- Ut C. MW „➢PV556 DuAwG Ca61RYGtwMRPfAtlD. s tN _ m AE 1/[ ukx wrNwOx Alxr 1 tw NA BE B sswv v s 1 ,nua x� xotm (SEE (SEE MIW.) 1 I �rB I I 1 �wq I - -¢ss. � !rb // SIFPS CONCRETE 9 pe W/ PAIUNC 1 =00' (B' v,cro5), SEE ARCH TIGHT CAPD OVERHEAD DODP TD - RFAwUI ' - VNDFALPWN�PMgND � \ s' 9B _ A11( 1___________ -_ \ •+-xlrj \ 4' ]aEWAIX RETAWNG BALL I I G� _�BHgiT TFIUI�I� I - ' �1(/FASIING NAfT1C 9CNK E4.OW / /' B /sNEEr uGHT - COHSRa= PED PAMP 1 I'D i.EUJ -- C , E h- . Poo UIUEF'cw-mA. 4B.ii PfPlll P!f TiM'.C= � G1EM,n.I N:I ali 6' mDE CHDSSWAU( SrPPWD 10 1 aTf/CCUNtt - _ PEDWtEM . AM AA- E1DrnH0 HAD.x TO - I -- MATCH PROPOSED 90EWAlA I.- .E GPOSSWAIJf SNIPI - y1� _� FIFYATON TO WTCH CWNtt PFAUIPf P O- � ----- - - - - PRR OPOSED CONSCYUCi Pm MNP I �------- RmS CONCRETE I �` -� ECG• -'�: PVJTnA D PS-T ur R+.siT I CAC PED RAMP - ...• - ` '- •••PB�� ..e ._ ti:,i ilw ,1[ii'_ • nNtIGARGQI 7 I >\ w -...._ .[ .0 ��A. ISRRC•rWYTIE SIGNAL I r/ s E� u a rt mT E• N _) '' i y N, rN4 ,•M'IAfE A JT •llf 4A.WPxT --i .i+ y ly ,`_ wr { PAD �Y 1 _TIV (�jP ..xn^n�u.. ss.u�ix- mi�.e_ �-- °n TEA OOCU RE °WEYYENr15 NrO[siEIAPWp1AOSROP NE mUl Go1LUe G NRHOMT. Px0 sPFFYtuTONS N,0 M[ oa. 11 R 11 o„'Mm wxs�iR'w•Rrox, wnlLLixE vnwEa N.s am�i wuPNiIIm° Aw t I-BE tavuwAY SiPRI Ba- Ut C. MW „➢PV556 DuAwG Ca61RYGtwMRPfAtlD. s tN _ m AE 1/[ ukx wrNwOx Alxr 1 tw NA BE B sswv v s 1 ,nua x� xotm (P � ��! r I ■i� I �rB I I 1 �wq I - -¢ss. � !rb // 1 µ DEnLLiWLS, awe➢, N pgriPAA�uI1W5IS X wxo y�nox °to A D NSIRP- I _ loon iP[ E 06EPRO10NICi6 Olei PR uE 10POwno SIW[ E P o io nl 61�IDXN CONSIWCT PI RAMP I,� MODIFY WSTWO M[OIAN BY sNaPmPNC SaunDALx BY 48 SW/ FIAIDRE (8' LCREEN AOOF -r PROPOSED 9BEBAIA EAS.T� 'TSNA }.1y- CO1011mZ, .: -t ,,` ;.1.- ,y;• ________ ________ i5 P GM= MDETrc rASEIRIIr GrARA j aBY E4.OW - I'D i.EUJ -- C , E h- . Poo UIUEF'cw-mA. 4B.ii PfPlll P!f TiM'.C= � G1EM,n.I N:I ali S��-/ $ �` -- - I -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -� - - -- - �_ >.- - -c.,. r� -�, - -- �------- rti"1.fi- �` -� ECG• -'�: .I _� { - ...• - ` '- •••PB�� ..e ._ ti:,i ilw ,1[ii'_ • nNtIGARGQI 7 I >\ w -...._ .[ .0 ��A. [ \. N ..I .r,c f4.�`•JA • K n ••�Y .•�� A rf IY � rJl N _) '' i y N, rN4 ,•M'IAfE A JT •llf 4A.WPxT --i .i+ y ly ,`_ wr { PAD �Y 1 _TIV (�jP ..xn^n�u.. ss.u�ix- mi�.e_ �-- °n TEA OOCU RE °WEYYENr15 NrO[siEIAPWp1AOSROP NE mUl Go1LUe G NRHOMT. Px0 sPFFYtuTONS N,0 M[ oa. 11 R 11 o„'Mm wxs�iR'w•Rrox, wnlLLixE vnwEa N.s am�i wuPNiIIm° Aw t I-BE tavuwAY SiPRI Ba- Ut C. MW „➢PV556 DuAwG Ca61RYGtwMRPfAtlD. s tN _ m AE 1/[ ukx wrNwOx Alxr 1 tw NA BE B sswv v s 1 ,nua x� xotm IUAM: •AN A ` M I . �. ' fl - -¢ss. � !rb // 1 µ DEnLLiWLS, awe➢, N pgriPAA�uI1W5IS X wxo y�nox °to A D NSIRP- I _ loon iP[ E 06EPRO10NICi6 Olei PR uE 10POwno SIW[ E P o io nl 61�IDXN a, - P-1 1RNLS sxAit H0T BE I=IUC= DORwG GONSiRYC1aN ux165 APPROYEO °T eE NLOxm oN p- SIPFLIS oR nD1W I S tiM [wIRA<D0.V rs i ] RIE NaNYMI nYweiss0f N[ ull[� s• mo AMSm , p Pwa �) I �•, EAlsnxc TRUFtc s¢NK OIL I � BM CAr 113: e LEGEND: - �z �I TO sIDENUJE I� h 4,m IN 'I -- - SITE DP - -YAMES - -- - Z9tlIxG: I Boa - -B. PROPOSED NX 90EW III i i �, L °TAW -CONN Cr TB EJ�IBIWD II TOV1 MG II 1 I 1 C PAVING NOTES: t) -E--.E.- asp : o.,uPL aiRewaNA°tSiN "o °R �°natiaw:rt w�RmaMn PBwC01°nxTOK'Nr J) RYEA N 0E01ECN - R V00.r /o0. wwADrwx AralwrMENrs As 1m[ As n �,'�,►" owl Poo UIUEF'cw-mA. 4B.ii PfPlll P!f TiM'.C= � G1EM,n.I N:I ali -Y SITE PLAN NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL DBU3B 6 Mt N ME DF D-C AHD/DB EKA OP CuAB. to A0.CMP1TUN1 oMwxc9 Tp0. mNCKtE aooPS ADiKLM 10 tID AFNIY 1M IDCARa6 ATO fSEY'ARale M gLEAPNL9a1 .Nwls 1°oH0. N tail[ nl pina�Ew� TRAxSV[I,SE .UIHTS AT 1N[ PIX[°M,C xOUwK I--s [vNC TME OR 91NL E11AaK AHD Muxrtxxxcf stops 0.o EFET P00. 1. A0.nN. [Dxswup Rc.l THE LU'fmA.- a VMf Sux[ m n _.1%p 17E, µpgDVfy m °µy OE ME PFnuRIpvO Au1H°R°VUOPoIIS6a 6µo SN4L PUrou, 5B[IP[k DN PHYAtE PNWxG TAGS PJYI NBUG SmIIn Ai EIASr Ox61 e[oC 6 1¢[o[a - .- to PR[mrt I.w rt ust Awsw[E PROPOsm e0AM1Y NAH A FM f00I1PN15t11011P8 Ax° °VDrx nNxW avwc[S tn[ 51PLL [dIRPiAOSt Ii,umIAW1T NonR B. FNCNFTA DP i tt °IOtsfJMP.xa[e or vwuAnwrs rRax iH[ PEAxs S fF[T [ACN BVE [r awe wwx wrETS. aD 9 AEr91 T zPN010Mf1Rk PGx r0A LItN011G lCWrolvS� m01WgU �DRUlG0.Awis AcYxst A[uNxc StmGas nn[RE LAID SPmNUDDIti xC0!aERErE a COXDxm -.1 ..TED ...ID °n TEA OOCU RE °WEYYENr15 NrO[siEIAPWp1AOSROP NE mUl Go1LUe G NRHOMT. Px0 sPFFYtuTONS N,0 M[ oa. 11 R 11 o„'Mm wxs�iR'w•Rrox, wnlLLixE vnwEa N.s am�i wuPNiIIm° Aw t I-BE tavuwAY SiPRI Ba- Ut C. MW „➢PV556 DuAwG Ca61RYGtwMRPfAtlD. s tN _ m AE 1/[ ukx wrNwOx Alxr 1 tw NA BE B sswv v s 1 ,nua x� xotm °. Rr[d N N,nexauR.E sxuwc[ Pw1 Nn NolYwOC akH oaNLS Y01I1D5 AR0 a[[vo.; 0.e FIE .- cMECMUS). On�SpP a sR tRa n wEx Fv Ns�wF w„ DEYCU116V /NO RDIOVK DP 1LL NSNIe SlwkeM[s Bx[N Nxs, rwADESt arsnxo Axq PPDPOSm wroRwnax swnrl ax vvxs sxYE YE [o. oxs Io Posr caHSTRUCroN PNUaxo 51w[ 0[ ax -snL Mo m -siAat vNIWW %[C"DYIGN ..1.O ALLOXEa m E m I C. /rR Wumm 1 µ DEnLLiWLS, awe➢, N pgriPAA�uI1W5IS X wxo y�nox °to A D NSIRP- I _ loon iP[ E 06EPRO10NICi6 Olei PR uE 10POwno SIW[ E P o io nl 61�IDXN a, - P-1 1RNLS sxAit H0T BE I=IUC= DORwG GONSiRYC1aN ux165 APPROYEO °T eE NLOxm oN p- SIPFLIS oR nD1W PNOIx[mwc otscx ssrNVrros S tiM [wIRA<D0.V rs i ] RIE NaNYMI nYweiss0f N[ ull[� t aWgX LASS BE BR[£mOA x� O0.WPTONN YKORRECRTDaxwN[s[R oR [nuvMw[ s, 1U 0 widws -. :rss mu[w aVU a[S�R o m0 ,2ZL- .A.Twa r s[cnox n Aoxrr PDJOUwc vRDP a N AP° o . coxes oR tRwmtExPR Amur wm�xwom[�w coRVUwcc inrl M.om 'nwo tANtsnrox I0 suArtow,lxelf L>WLL - -._- - - -. -- MxPR.•l:llat Axis Pm nw°A iRf of fAE, OPNxACPUNTNlM01NIFRMI YFEPNO YuW01 WL iii5� ronrs iraM"Sw•Ax1i c° ro oill�ow«m° r15t o0.vR A9 A R6Ua 0T nlaE Inrmvl �. - ,l rw NY! WNSTRUCNOx w rvt I 1 C PAVING NOTES: t) -E--.E.- asp : o.,uPL aiRewaNA°tSiN "o °R �°natiaw:rt w�RmaMn PBwC01°nxTOK'Nr J) RYEA N 0E01ECN - R V00.r /o0. wwADrwx AralwrMENrs As 1m[ As n �,'�,►" owl r �' �•� 65TH STREET WEST is lo' :Al \,� LEGAL DESCRIPTION R -50.00 ....y x iGar a/'�ia ni'•'r �a m• ° 1QI'37•E 253,OB _- {.7031 rw.wo.nar.r e ' \` w � - "� � .. .f x r•+ - __- _,.:. Y'1 ..- � - +E -" •1 I�'+i�r��.<«r...Errmrr.sw�.. "• _ , nvux9 ,- rY tl / Y �?` 'am x.: I 1 I I '6 I .xx m I .w.c,: a a 1. tw _ , rr .xxa..aaw,.a.wwwe rr.raa.rox r+t yI I �' I ,; - / I r.r � yt ....m 0.F•• - � i � Ba ,;,,,,a `� rlrr. w.vlmrrv.ry • �: I 1 . • � r:.w i � 11 2..I � x,a I a+-� �a � � Ya o"bw`xa..r... ,r..` ar t 4 a,n 31 I--I I � __ _ _ I I i••' .�� - I � l.� 3X awrrm�wr �_. I �'� aI "� .: ___ �I r8 w wa __. A _ �'I r,•� �r4+i� rw.�srwW �.xv.� ®ra I �!={� pw I I IS I I w} a rLaxJ � ..x••xa.arerr. - Ci ' f/' a �.w 1 � ._ i - fi- . _ s•° •r 0 � •Lar+.raw.Yrr.w . wr,.au . ulw _, x I � fl l� I r� = 1° - B� %Y a9:, � I- � t (n �A 'r arrwwnw.r•uswrer++pe.row -At: 8 '• _ �a^,•q i / °ARt Sra►Mo _3 "II,x.,•x` _- ~ rn. _ - - I ,^, I I O a'�`.a`."rar. °...r.iv+.•aw.o..e..na . wr •:' I+ '�6„ 1 / PION 3OD20211t0002 S , {"0'• Exisrwc z -sfORY ORiCI[ /6 cco r «\ I s W i m~ru wrrA•x�.r,a..xw wrralrvwa/.w...Mr.ara®a li r 3 2 2y a II . r I orrice 9weowc �- e°.'�s��. I .0 '.+ I M�'.' - - u Pfo/ waxax•I � � .a._ • a.0 � wrrl Z ..,.r .. �... aa...wwa...r r+a.. W rz LEGEND pN i I. ryS. z - - --�/ I •'1I •w, xx µ t aq':'. ii Rix, °'�' Z O "w Q sm rwlx. 0 m�ra�ue - --- ,w " E � •..sn �.�.er. � I fal: n rt ...� u.o, - -.- � T 1/ F- ,wAal.el Nag! r 1l� s � _ 1.,. :, ".- -!"E-+i: I ' ?.✓°� vxc� °ur". PrA M T r1 m_�.i «•� :aw } «e I."_"n •� r� p a yIr r� I O�E4 - 'nE�i. • a "A3_ �" ' r` -T__ ' �w�l I �„ � ,�``j �R+�' ♦`� t ` w�l . � -Nij� I'37•E�_ /�Zi -rte � _ � � '�u�/r -�i - _ _ ___ I_____ _ 's' 4'd �x+9><xEEn •• °' i ..:.— = .��.�— •—• -ra,x / w, �� �.®ax'�� I ... "`�•' �` « � ♦ ®,r..... r$ � �- I t zo .o N 30A® T PONT OF rROxNKMEe A E9O9MP ONI0f. .IMS - i ALLIANT P _ M�Wn—° • "S.. !vim !� / ENGINEERING, INC. wu,u S:S.IS. ooe9s a '`�• ` .u. III {�'� ./ ,w.OAV. UITE MINNEAPOLLS,NN - 16 300 fq.ex�• aua – �F' PHONE (GlZ) 7W 3080 _ FAX W2) 768.3099 DE AURORA ON FRANCE ENEEEm rr 6500 FRANCE AVENUE 5 s�cuh K3uE0 Siss sln o EDINA, MINNESOTA Q� XS H'.1k —RaullcO. PE L:eJ 771 =Z wl4r� /I 65TH STREEFiVEST-" Z T.L' pp R•50.00 -7&31 All 7" _7 Z. 7_T i tile. II it T" -4- LOT -.0 '6 1—, -s— m 0 j Ao full, ulun ..w 61=0 E.- SANTARY ALLIANT `4m TO K ........... AaACA� TO € + - ^':I T ', I w"I r�r —i>�I I °` 1' 3r- 7�q "'T`�1 (!,— H -1 ^�' *. ` ■ AURORA 0 IN 10 -mm V T RIWA�Li--"� 1., "41 foq, O�A li'z .ollult. J. it ll� K—OCITICD TO RIR=Ar. 0 IV. WIMAIRIWmi7.0 le, W—D—W. J- 4, N AURORA ON FRANCE .-T FINAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT 1's x '47 0500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH NOTE. EDINA. MINNESOTA REMOVAL AND DEMOUTION 0 10 WAS BEGU IN 2013 UNDION 2W6iRE!!!n PERMIT. Ai 2 SEPARATE" !XALE FEET y 1 CITY —ITT T, .—IT. LEGIE14& REMOVAL NOTES: GENEF A6L bu: 11 0 -zmr- EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMO PLAN o .5 13.0063 C1.0 411� CY rraowmm ar�nm �vr>�' imamu.asr.nma aa.aaaanr.m.m,n� ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ET=- rwmaw Exec wm xcnxec �� wocrtvmrasrt. � ma a..awr..w arm.+. STANDARD SILT FENCE .. wcvwa amanarmmv� xowtiv� KK�� INLET PROTECTION - CATCH BASIN INSERT AFTER CURB CONSTRUCTION a�a r�- r f, •{ r k�.�% � h nrvaaa - at'IDar amm INLET PROTECTION FOR CATCH BASIN BEFORE CURB I CONSTRUCTION -Ill J�'R•`bf"hl �l� -.�I�� �.�y� ..r ... ... -IIUI�(f NN'i'I�RJ� ¶.IL -.I X11 ', r. 8612 CURB AND GUTTER aue a/• au 4 • xo rcu ar .o' a.aPo+a 4• SURMOUNTABLE W /STAMPED CONCRETE \ I/ Iii "1 ljll F�'=n' ITi�Ti �n -n�nnl r= limn =n= a =n =n =n W j STANDARD SURMOUNTABLE (wlz cufle A GlI1EA) TYPICAL RETAINING WALL AND RAILING DETAIL II II �II i T-�II .III i(J'�'i�II (m nrwr1O°ua91a uwor sP[c av�mrmmlu uir (ioua aosa�l rmr v¢ ala CONCRETE DRNEWAY SECTION aiu xou�s e�w'm WuE { "r"o�x -rxsM cwxiq �� � I1III1 isa)0i SPEC J iaa 3 :u4i:�� =� YN 611Mpm AlafAVnE HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION aoan �m°a10sa� � (scm �u rmw lsoa vaa MEey�r o��uo ®� Ir >¢ a CONCRETE WALK SECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM SEDIMENT �NfROL�RACTICE� a� EROSION CONTROL SCFIEDULE /SEOUENCMQ ANAL STABILIZATION POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES EROSION CONTROL flMSPONSSLE PARTIES: - wrnRw�aw EWM'xwfl6m4 a]NV -]aa] uvuWxx ]]a0i laa0 oeanre. commxr aeesrnx ouxa oEVnaaaort EflurrrF as w>nmry. ! v KI avpanubna M6j 'anaq Prv(naional Ian v! IN Slala Mar.. PE Pai. Ha. Prvlsrl MaaPor ALLIANT .....a.+.�° AURORA InaURO LA LC arowroEVExne— ED. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MINNESOTA I llfls DETAILS •,anrJ x:m`, m _SHRUB PUNTING DETAIL 13.0063 C2.0 ML '?D Nn, HQPE GROUTED MANHOLE CONNECTION 3 TYPICAL ION (N.T.S.) HDPE TRENCH INSTALLATION DETAIL ID - 10' WIDTH ON FRANCE AVE CROSSWALK DETAIL 1 G ZONE. L� REEK L--- Q F 1111111m, tl (z) JSTALLADQ BA -51E flpiear mN! Na Ian o! IN SIal1 o/ Nrvsiafa. Mail, Rausch. PE ALLIANT AURORA .... ... uc AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 8900 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MINNESOTA 11E I DETAILS I,- — s+nc —er 13.0063 C3.0 RAIN GA 4 SECTION NOT TO SCALE 3LlH 103 102__ 101.5 RIPRAP OVERFLOW 101 100 3' SINGLE SHREDDED MULCH 2 47 99 SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR COMPLETE PLANTING SCHEDULE. 98 MIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24' 97 WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME): 70% SEMI— COARSE WASHED SAND 30% MnDOT GRACE 2 COMPOST UNDISTURBED, UNCOMPACTED r_I T T _ _'. '_ _ _" Ipa_ IA— --- --------------- NORA Mark Rau.-., OE Z , ' "" ALLIANT AURORA AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MINNESOTA rr nu. BMP DETAILS i - ' 13.0063 C4.0 F� I s: ,I i P.ar I li I i • 'r � •'kl 2 1t�•,I} 65TH STREET WEST T J ®� I __L_11 . — w« I, e'm�'C/� Wa1wFf Pm R/.l. I 10 1 — ^""'4°iT,P1I zw o a,rnc a.1a yIr I �b Q 3i I j O Q LEGEND: I • ng- �. I I.. e °n � " � ur rmea rawx as�ws .r rus ..nmm rwurwm�r Z V, rxaM1O° ALLIANT :,...r,...ro. xuo ___ re• �L si •xv, I h IN rru ®.um.m. an» Qo o ; li p m.,,c.o oowro j ------------------ O t{ly- b _ _ _ _ _ T_ 1901 \,IH.. / N. _ _ —/i..' AURORA eM ., _ .•r�.u--. � - -- ------ r-1--------------- ..t'.,_ -:Y � � `S - -- -- - -- - -! SITE DATA s E inr :.w..�s ,.. •., r q l rc q _ _ q _ ? _ _ ...' - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a �..... -' _ `l1 n F M row .,v. vP a P1, Houvr OEVCLOrasar co. ' .j ro �mr AURORA ON FRANCE N RE ZONING SUBMITTAL Vv 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA .o •,. , ` ,• •r,!%_ -. ;: / 11N' . -� I rrc xEr;s;oxsN SITE PLAN NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: PAVING NOTES: �,T. ,csual,rTx 9 ..Prr .K,nar ,® ^r ^�+°^�^'°^°�•^r°° c,T, wenrtrx wlzvzol, w.o �. PPCm, maa ro.rcw urm a rr .m.ua .0 "LL a'V° "'O FFE 1, =X A0.NST.Er jOI2712014 - •�r,n .,a �, •� urvm .,rtr r.., m, io.w, m, m,aa ne uro m mn wo mw s.,. may. amr.,,m m �� �, ,.�. wu r a_me a a-a.m `�"m' %1p � �r"y � Sm.e r m m .. r rr �aP.rr.rra a as �`IC�jVIp��E� SITE PLAN Ea ® v.3.� ..wnF''o....mn.ax,....®w.wmw `r,"" oN ,wm,o, n ..ow.0 m x..nna m,wcnn m,wmr. m�v.cv mn.r x ,m a naz.u�a mrn ..rom r.an,.uo. vFC n.P. 1y eONStR ° °�I vro nom. scree, x�. Fop 1310069 C6.0 all �Inrn %amrr mr rr m. sar. i o��o;w w ryPFr prr oy W 44 tl M L.j 16' I IT-T Lc 0 W51 - S 0 0 Lu Q- a SIR:- j ALLIANT 65TH STREET WES,T,-' .. .. ...... .. i Al I yP.A v 4�11 W AURORA Noun - 115m I—.. uc j 7. —X! 'It T 10 16' I IT-T Lc 0 W51 - S 0 0 Lu � - Q- a SIR:- j ALLIANT Z .. .. ...... .. W AURORA I—.. uc j 7. —X! 'It T F' AURORA ON FRANCE f 'I'sil FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN �[, —H- .I, / y �� 0009 I i F500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA MINNESOTA I , GRADING LEGEND: I — GRADING NOTES: ALL U-Ff INS— SHALL US PLACED AND CON—CD W STORMWATER DATA' A D.D. I. CS SH- SLOPE ASV PROPOSED BUILUNDS AT —S. —S NAAN. .—C • /D' [NT PDAmuTS ETafE D & STRF M= PRCHI TO ANY DONSUOU—N. RCUSS S70CNPUZ "Me _I SHE 13. E SAPHS_— AHel A—AU—S E= — R—E UO NA ELICEr N CITY supNIFT& mlmjnl3 or — " -- — AAW jtL 16— FZI DOE SON STANCARD 11E I —THEUT =R=. ON, A, (500)-1111. 0 — -OR — SHE AND =j- 1 L.Co AC I TO 0' oUHUjfD a mu or I F- 1 2' Ill 4M FLOCO ROLRUND STANCAADS A=7OlDN`.=E3D0N` S ""`U"`N H.. "-T Ill M —) -1 CLOIE Cr .1 OTH. — _) — . AA—D xL:PnrcW[ [D �A ACI U CS FILL 11— IS SE 11.1 C.- CF OD % SECD — ANo A N_ � A� C, GRADING, EROSION, AND A C, SHE 1. THE — —.R wc= V "I ZD1.1 SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN or CUC. DOW F. _.R�IA 7. :FER —T— RC— Fol SOL C—F— .--N—S AND SUSC. C- SU.N.., CH.Z% COAHNOL — AND S 15. CONT—OR CDOUUN- —ATUPUSUC UFLUDED SUCH AS T—C — NAHCHC� — WUSNO, PS—C. A-., —A 2 —p— tD M — P—N .2. NALk ROUHS3 W CASKSAL Ail D-D OE DUNUSCED MI Co- — TO — -- - C- OF 13.0063 C6.0 � - T, I I II 41: 44-1 _ . it I I G. RI.. R—G 11— I—RON W E. rts n4 ir cq R C.* 6s— LEGEND: —)— PROPOS[0 STORM SE'MR I— PROPOSCD IR= =E_ E R- •CY 65TH STREET WEST T; NN 7-- - A MW & SAL B—C roWX612- MME RE : IN 7 R 15S-4W PERF HDRE 0 C: -- 1- - - - - -- ------- II I W- ff-- =-- R 7 L ------- -NEE -11"q/. RFLOCATpx ' E- aA 12U r _ THAT SIR It -"NEE ■11191 H 011111111 t -rid-mrm OMENS ■III 1W ■1, oil III, on millmil MIN L 05a �: RE IL11 12' EP. =TZ1 .0 I-RUS. BEND F NEC — ro KEEP E NG UNC .. -C.— Al — —LE C01PLE-0 TE1,,n CN.DE OR — REEO.— -b- 2W 8' MR N 0 Sax SFAV ST110 W — C. C.— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W. REIUIIIXUL C—ECT WsmaO POINT s- 1+25 W1• RLSFR (COV ,SAT RIR ow K - - - - - - - - - - ___I_____ - - - - sT60-6E:WEFVSCHEDULE: _tu- , . I . 1 1.1- _—LNC%E_l F-2 �,. �j 1=11 :7T I —T. I I EZ I Ir WND 7 . 6di.. cz y: ev A UTILITY NOTEa. N3, ANI S— E 1. 1 RE %NO RS=�El L T RE— .1� _::T:� = A I wMLw 4 DC P= S,=K 4. C` R'" G� R. R, CN_CE. 7. gVjZU�l I=E .-- EE D —:7. CNE 3 PA PX CN._ L 05a �: RE IL11 12' EP. =TZ1 .0 I-RUS. r-. 'D 2W 8' MR N 0 Sax SFAV ST110 W — C. C.— P. — — W. REIUIIIXUL C—ECT WsmaO POINT s- 1+25 W1• RLSFR (COV ,SAT RIR ow K e. e 110 11 1 sT60-6E:WEFVSCHEDULE: _tu- , . I . 1 1.1- _—LNC%E_l F-2 �,. �j 1=11 :7T I —T. I I EZ I L 05a �: RE IL11 12' EP. =TZ1 .0 I-RUS. r-. 'D W. REIUIIIXUL C—ECT WsmaO POINT s- e. e 110 11 1 sT60-6E:WEFVSCHEDULE: , . I . 1 1.1- _—LNC%E_l F-2 �,. �j 1=11 :7T I —T. I I EZ I 0, fo% MRRK RCSCH.. PE Rn. N, AL nT ®IRwlsu,w. LI.0 AURORA V MOUNT OEVFJl)PA�M CO. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN EIS 0 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA. MINNESOTA — IN. UTILITY PLAN OWTMD — — 13.0063 C7.0 p We E LO MEE 'ME, CE EEC ARCHTE— "J 1-141 rllimmum 0 OMAN . .......... NE1416,111MIME Ra M .11 01 MEN liR IT.......... NOW, We E LO MEE 'ME, .11 11 U OSCAPPE SCHE ULE NOTE: PIANBNLSTWD &AVE 1, ED. PUNVrn 11 s -ENE ro u CE EEC ARCHTE— "J .11 11 U OSCAPPE SCHE ULE NOTE: PIANBNLSTWD &AVE 1, ED. PUNVrn 11 s -ENE ro u Mlizvmdlzw ALLIANT AURORA I—l', UC m— DEVEW , �CO. AURORA ON FRANCE =INAL DEVELOPMENT DLAN '500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH '0114A. MINNESOTA FFE L W ID-TRENT 10127/2011 • ANDSCAPE PLAN —, .., — 13.0063 C8.0 CE EEC ARCHTE— 1-141 BLUE liR -------- -- -- - - - - R—K —0 m w I. TREES O. RE—NDUA LANDSCAPE REOUIREMENB PLANTING NOTES 7- SALT TOLERANT LANDSCAPE LEGEND E PLANT MATERIAL ,Zmum R oul—m REQUIRED TREES: .R—E— ED) co— BB,) PROVIDED TREES: T�. urt It 7E 'u" (2.5, a BE.) I Q =Z. —T= p— E. 'D . l.k TREES —TING TREES ALDNG PERBIVER OF WE TO R—H 7 IOTAL TROES . WI: GREEN ROOF pSk GREEN ROOF 7,1123 5F r�z W —1=1 .=,r— R, BE, 11— oil DRETR ROOF TO BE PUNTED D—BlU MODUIUIR OREEN ROOF E. (—F —). -- — TO BE R 1/4• LUDI A -- OF -- —U-. —U— — -- 0— — 11— D F—D D— TO BE DETERMINED. 11¢ RYWT R, 10, N RAINGARDEN PLANTINGS -T E T==� ="�=V rl11—Iwo = =1=1191 =%Q DD-Dj"=lX ➢IY 50N 50 — I-D SOMR/R— —E — RDs/. —1. 100 51 IJTTUE B—EMIS.hi—hy— —p— 4 4: L. 4 24: 4' F— 24' 4' —L. F— 30' 11 R) IN FEET Mlizvmdlzw ALLIANT AURORA I—l', UC m— DEVEW , �CO. AURORA ON FRANCE =INAL DEVELOPMENT DLAN '500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH '0114A. MINNESOTA FFE L W ID-TRENT 10127/2011 • ANDSCAPE PLAN —, .., — 13.0063 C8.0 I , -^--• . � - Existing Street Lights � � r Illumination Not shown "y`"SVeetscape Poles per City Standard Located per City Y 4 �w �..)• ,• Y U. V U 1• ,• 1r 1• U Y 1r 1• U 4 4 T• it 1• N , Y 4 r Y 1 • •1r U \• r U Ir N U1. U N 1> U ,> ,. - -U w 4Y> 1•�l• Y• 4 N \Y U Y U 1• `osr,. u- i }4aNY4rb- rr -Y1b UY�•�u+ �(l,ly� r'� V1, •44'•r ' \•- 4VYY4NNN UN4 rUUNN4'•YJiVU I u N Y N 4 -r N Y Y U 1• N N U r \r Y Y Y r 4 4 Y 4 4 4 • Y • r U Y r • Y r r I• rY 4 N U 4 ,• r Y a N N u Y,r Y yr_ Y r �yl•'4.Y 1 r -Y r•"r>T� • N 4 Y Y U'Y M Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 N Y N Y N Is M Y Y Y Y r A• ,> r N N Y Y N r r Y • Y'} Y tl\ �Yi u Y di•- \• u Y N i, Y Y r . N„ r 4 N Y I• ,r N N u 4 ,• Y U Y 4 b L M Y Y r r N r r U N Y Y N r N \r r N U U 1• N \• 4 4 N u • r r r 1> YU • ��• V.4 M Y r N Y 4 4 1• Y 4 Y 4 .�YJ J, 1• ,• b 4 N 1r 4 N 4 Y 4, r r Y ,r 1r'Y Y N' -_ Y -_ Y-N b r r Y M-'Y YC 1• Y N Y Y ,)V N • 1l,•1 r r4MN Y1r f /N„ Y \Y • Y M> N M Y r 4 • N r 1N • N Y Y r 4 M 1�vy� \• ,' Y yyyN .. ,�U Nyr 1•,• N r N 1, r Y N 1N • YL1 -lN 1 r r 4 Y 4 N 1 M1r , jr • M 4 4r N Y Y\ N V 1> • \• N N �\\> • N VN r ' U Y M ' —N tT ,• .. p Y Nr N N )N Y N 11 r r +b fYS5 .YY � 1.NY,(• -r Y Y Y YY Y Y Y U N r N r Y 4 1• Y N N r N ,1 N 1, Y M ,• ,• a r \• 4 rr r + Y 4 N 1' M1' M1' '' M Y'•r,,• Y Y Y M 1•� N \> 1. 4 4 N \• ,• 4 4 4 r ,r • 4 \> Y N U N M N N V N M N Y r N N Y Y N Y M Y N Y Y r Y r Y,M N N riw4 Y, L, N Y r rr�•Y M 4 Y 4 r N MM •'Z••Y • ,• 1. 4 \• 4 1• \• 1. 4 1. ,. L N Y N 1r \• r Y 4 r b N r Y Y r ,• N Y Y.L 4 w 4,�r V ,jl,,l \_ -Y1 r ,,- N`Ykilt M 4 Y a , N 1U Y b Y\ M N M�1b1U �.�,. 1. 4 U 1� —�N \ha a �� N 1,�1• N 1.0 U U r N 1 I �.lifHf - _'Y Ar' 1 N N U rIN w b,i Y U Y 1 1 r Y r M M r • Y .( x�N N Y N Y ,• )• N 1 1 1 4 1 „ N \• ,• \• U f• r 1 rr_1 1 War -ITT- 1 �• \• U N Y N1 1 r • ,I r •• AIP U N N N N u N 1 4 1� ' 1 • U � Y o u O� VL 1 N N N Q'U F rr6 4 N • \{ Y N T ER 1r Ir b U r Y Y Y t N, M 1 -, \ Y Y 1, l• Y N U Y (1�- N '1( N 4 M Y N YY N N N b'MJn J - J u u J ,T' \. 4 U 1r 1. N M- M I.IA•. ,r ,• \r ,• 1• ,> N Ir ,r \•I. L \'/T'M1 -Y' i � �� M 4Zr �iW 4 rIY N y , r N Wall Mount Fixtures, r ,r ,. ,..Z, L ,.,r,1. Y N ,• „ ,. .1.1. 1r NrYYr UN jNNUI� fi • NNNNN�II'A�, by ll!Ur144u ,NYr � ' V b, Yg1i�y U•M ,. 11Y Y r N N NBYI �> 4 N r Y ,• I Y Y' ,� ti 1• 1. 1• r N Y 4� r. U N, r 1 \\ to Light Driveway L 4 �> N Y Y r�N \• Y \ N N } U N 1y M 1. Y If 4 1L1 4-, - r b_ } ,I 11 N IL Y \• 4� rl'Y N w 1• r Mr � (within-tunnel) ^ 1 r 1• N � \• \• ant' VS ,• ,t YYY 5T ,> N Y'r N \11L MIY M r N II,Y Y _y 1OL - -M M M_Y� \• W M, Y Y Y Y 1• ley. 1 l U U J IJ U 4 1 fir V M Y ,> U�Y -iYI M {. Y 4 N„ U �. r -Ii -1i 4 -M -1• } 1r N Y�• N , M 4 N Ir }� Y Y }/ 1. 1• r r U Y U 10, N • J N U \. ,. 4 r N 4 11 „i \ -1 ,M ,• 1.1 f00. r M\ Y 4- 1• Nll -YYYY • N N N Y, \, M Y U 4 41• u Y4 y\•YN; Yr \•N�NM \r ,•R•Y N\'I NrN rY NMY G C r r i} , r r Y r ,\• . r 4 b N U�Y NIU 4 ,• �pA••Ih4• . �y�y�R y4Y N r 1f� Y O o C o O 7 CI o c 4t!- N' L Y r �. rrr Yr rr1rs• rl;M1 il} r r {} L r rrY • r 4Y r r r Yw r r . 4r r r� N Y M Ur N YrN . ,N ,Ya,t7,4.l• . . �. �i, M r Yr Y rr , 'N N:N u „ . . r . N Vb ,D r • L 4. ,. ],•,N• N N „ r ] I N 1 r ,• N a r NM r O O o O � rI lJ „r\. rN •rN 4N ,N• N„ 1• ✓ N - r 4 - - N II 1; , , • 4F4•,, MN1• N i. 1r ' � � O o C o G �j4 N yNN vr A1 Y1i l �• •, . - . , y :Y YYi . .• , _ N Y1U w M Y1Y1�(•tI a,, Y4 U Y V .. .• r 11 4 r N r ; Decorative Wall Mount Fixtures a. �. Y r J r Nw 1� P6N 1N EIEVELEV EEVE�EV U r a O wY Y Y r Loading Dock Roof L r, 1 s�An r N. ” • U 1, N N u ill hield lighting NN Nr N N w4 t from this area N N r Y Wall Mount Fixtures Wl Mon Fixtures r Y Y 10 to Light Emergency MM N Y M to Light Driveway ,1M ww Y y . ' l 11 MN '•� 64•, " . Y>i N 11. 1• NZr r 1• �1//Y,�� Egress Path Y AI,lIt. 1r w,�b,. Y�d✓ Mr wy r '-Lw • , • • .\. . , . . Y , NNrNN 44I 41r UN r•1 1. 4 N 1• N • .• N Y N r N N r - f • r"V 4'1. \•1. • N\ r Y Y ( /4rrr _rr • ••.��.�••NMN -N -41\ - �•4r1rN U 4 1M 1. YU{� } N 1' r r � .. ] _ ] '] >. r r • . • . � • r Y 1 � y, N.4 1 1 N 1r , r �•rrrrYrrrrrw rurr4 YYYrM r rr . 4 , 1•j•4. Y. 1> -\.E• .� } V. Y 1N�, -1•r Nr NNYNrNr Na -- b44Yr Y a a uYNNNY YN -YYN 14.uN�1 YYr 4 4 M N • Y r r • • r r V 1, r N M 1� N N Y• Y N w 1> , 1• N U Yr „bl 0.0 Footcandles at Property _ 4— 0.1 Footcandles at Property Line Line Facing Residential — Aurora Site Irr•m.a,. E,m q W Y•ryw•I ialYgYww ,uNIINrN W 4vNr m an ceaNOa,.rN.Yw 4n wz�..Tr.rr•Na�rme•wt ®ssrr. m Plan provided by Pulse Lighting and modified by Edward Farr Architects t't1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN �V �P �ULSEG` p =774r, •N N IM S4U e/ NYN,r EUnrd A. Fur EDWARD FART . \I:1'HITFt'Tti IM AU!.•RA AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTN PIA, MINNESOTA Clir 9�Rix- 5 -asaN SITE LIGHTING PLAN L— r.•�_ 13.025 E1.1 FW L-1: A-All end A-11 ph 112 I ffi—B m 11 P =3h- FREE. LEW 8 M-RAW-EDISDRI-4P , Mgk -i Naa- WEN Oil 11 IR, =-- R_ 9E- �_ FlIclure _WN; NP W m M TR m - EEMMMIM Fiximl LWO WP2 QD COOPER L$GHnNO - LUMARK' lk- F51 MmaF-Is RNM=S 31_� L F, =smn r?A F11twe L a- XXX Eq+, . CA, regwretl eVeet light 0 INVUE' I A. F.,, .....16362 AURORA AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH = INA. MINNESOTA SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE TYPES ,, — 13.025 E1.2 —~—~~ ` U U ~~ �� � ~~ --- —_' 65T4 STREET WEST / / 1U tL 126 oxnn' IwcL (5) ACCESSIBLE | | � / / � AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BASEMENT FLOOR pum 13.025 *u.0 Himm Elm 126 oxnn' IwcL (5) ACCESSIBLE | | � / / � AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BASEMENT FLOOR pum 13.025 *u.0 .g g —P O �nY _ 65TH STREET WEST 11 II Z Cr I L�L I\ IQ I� G Q I� AURORA m.tae«.,i, uc rcevmarAUmco. ON FRANCE iEVELOPMENT E AVENUE SOUTH ESOTA 'LAN m.a, xwer. A2.1 " SN• Sou - Slwq Prmla fi20 s. f. LOUNGE Slwa Slwq JE Id. Siwq Pr rvalY 552 s.f. 0 ❑a92 -.1 . I .f05 .r. s.f. ❑ sloop N r4� SIUO, Slwa X03 E.r. TRNISITIONA, CMtE IT units '�• rR\ Slwq ,� 51wa I Slwq ❑ . Oa03 s.l. SanN $Iwq loop slwq SIUOw PImIE �a ,"a OPEN 10 t h4 WIQ4I ICU NININS WION RIDY LIYIN6 ROOM SIWa Slwq LIVING 1w. m I �1 • IM [1�4 -`wl I crRE sulres r ry 0 �rl u Ed—If k Farr 6alr as. No. 16362 Pra�Yri M CARE _ .` -f- SUITES - -' - IVIN6 ROOM slwq Slww -, m's- ■ AURORA A lwq S I- S Inr.s�m.nls, L SEM mri _ P WE JPWE ❑ NWUNEO[VY101•.vLtrl c�. vr° rrl �{,{ AURORA ON FRANCE FFINAAN DEVELOPMENT PL T `s fmlgn 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EOINA. MINNESOTA vI.11r. SECOND FLOOR PLAN N P-11 1 sn u 4L 13.025 g2n2ej 1 N • '�• rR\ Ism ,� I . i�I 1w. m I �1 • IM I r ry 0 �rl u Ed—If k Farr 6alr as. No. 16362 Pra�Yri M CARE _ .` -f- SUITES - -' - IVIN6 ROOM slwq Slww -, m's- ■ AURORA A lwq S I- S Inr.s�m.nls, L SEM mri _ P WE JPWE ❑ NWUNEO[VY101•.vLtrl c�. vr° rrl �{,{ AURORA ON FRANCE FFINAAN DEVELOPMENT PL T `s fmlgn 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EOINA. MINNESOTA vI.11r. SECOND FLOOR PLAN N P-11 1 sn u 4L 13.025 g2n2ej 1 7 pl 7 mill A. F0/+ m+a ea +u. 16762 Prey ■AURORA Wrcnm.(O LA ammocvuorAUxr co. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0000 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MINNESOTA THIRD FLOOR PLAN RTH AND 5TH SIM.) 13.025 A2.3 a 4 pn araA. Fa,r 16362 EDWARD FARK AURORA ulc crmr /n�- Mouxrcevraa.orntu. -r��. AURORA ON FRANCE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 6600 FIANCE AVENUE SOUTH EOINA, MINNESOTA T1111 ROOF PLAN PP,e„o — .men .—, 13.025 A4.1 ' KVERNSTOEN, RONNHOLM &ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS 14 May 2014 Stephen Michals Mount Development Co. 10400 Viking Dr. Suite 160 Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 NOISE REPORT: 6500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Kvernstoen, Ronnholm & Associates, Inc. was retained by Mount Development Co. to model mechanical noise levels from the building at the south property line of the site at 6500 France. To that end I gathered sound data for the two chillers on the roof as well as the Magic Pac units located on the 3�d 4th and 5th floors of the proposed new building. I then calculated the expected noise levels from the equipment at the loudest locations at the south line of the property. For my calculations I used manufacturer's sound data from Magic Pac for Model MGEA -09 -241 and from York for the two Model YVAA0183ABV46 chillers equipped with low -sound fans and low- sound -level kit. All units are calculated at the 100% level, which is the loudest expected sound level. Chillers The chillers are located at the NE corner of the 6500 France building in the circular element referred to as "the crown The direct distance from the chillers to a person standing at the south property line is approximately 175 ft. However, the building and parapet acts as a very effective sound barrier for the chillers. I have calculated the noise level at the property line closest to the chillers to be below 25 dBA. This is very well within the 50 dBA maximum required by Minnesota Rule 7030. See Fig 1 for the location of this calculated 2444 BRYANT AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 300 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 TEL 612.374.3800 • FAX 612.374.3133 • eMAIL info @kracoustics.com 6TT 6500 France Avenue Mechanical Noise Calculations 14 May 2014 Page 2 sound level. This location was chosen because it is expect to exhibit the loudest sound levels from the chillers on the roof. Magic Pac Units These units are located on exterior of the south side of the 6500 France building on the 3rd 4th and 5th floors, as shown schematically in Figs 1 & 2. The loudest point from the 6 chillers facing the south will be on -axis with one of the sets of 3 vertical chillers. I have calculated the noise level to be an even 50.0 dBA at this location. At the midway point between the two vertical rows of Magic Pac units, the sound level would be approximately 1 dB lower. (See Figure 2). At other locations along the south property line the sound levels from the Magic Pac units will be lower than 49 dBA. Noise levels from the chillers on the roof will not have any impact on the noise levels at these locations. In order to achieve these low sound levels, the Magic Pac units for the apartments on the East and West sides must be located on the East and West faces of the building. Thus, the sound levels at the property line from the York chillers and the Magic Pac units will meet the daytime and nighttime MPCA rules. Given that the measured L50 is 55.6 dBA at that location, and that the spectrum from the Magic Pac units will be similar to that of the traffic noise, the Magic Pac units will not figure significantly in the soundscape at the south property line of the 6500 France building. Please contact me with any comments or questions. Steven Kvernstoen A� 6500 France Avenue Mechanical Noise Calculations 14 May 2014 FIGURE 1 Pf2o��FYy Ll� � tj 0-\ & I C-- 0 IQ I T S 1. o dm 07-TffrS �m cg -t-�pN 2. d.5A ^-r 7+Ej3 L � �i°'v70sJ Page 3 5%1 A-/j+- ORIIIErs h41 6500 France Avenue Mechanical Noise Calculations 14 May 2014 FIGURE 2 Page 4 &t;-00 �/ 4-114- So Uta E1.F-v&I-TIVO PA c_ G:Ot #C1.1* 10 p 1 DECIBEL LEVEL GRAPHIC- -� READING OF FRANCE AVENUE GENERATED FROM 1ACTUAL TRAFFIC 66.0 dBA I p QC' p �ssTx sTrrr =eT WEST p r spa 1111 111111 w N CHILLER 1 - °Z p t5 Z yl" Q tl 1 I I O 2W p 0 � O oQ MAGIC PAC UNIT$ O — — p Q. eh ` =O \ U \ In 2 Z W yyII \ O O I 111 PROJCTED READING AT �1 n n n of PRO TED READING AT PROPERTY LINE FROM ' 0 PROPERTY LINE FROM NEW MAGIC PAC UNITS 1 ? N EW HVAC UNIT 50.0 dBA t ,1.- 25.0 d8A 1 i POINT OF,S 'I 6,566 FRAN o_ ACTUAL READINGS OF FRANCE I 'U' ACTUAL READINGS OF FRANCE AVENUE GENERATED FROM 1 AVENUE GENERATED FROM TRAFFIC AT POSITION 2: 1 I TRAFFIC AT POSITION 1: 1) 55.5 dBA 1) 66.7 dBA 2) 56.0 dBA 1 2) 66.0 dBA 3) 54.4 dBA i 3) 64.0 dBA 4) 55.5 dBA I = 1 4) 66.7 dBA I I I I 1 1 I I i I 1 1 tl I I I I I i DATA COLLECTION LOCATION NOTES: 0 30 60 120 1. DATA COLLECTION PROVIDED BY KVERNSTOEN, RONNHOLM & ASSOCIATES. 2. COLLECTION TIMES ARE AS FOLLOWS: SCALE IN FEET 7 -9AM WEEKDAY, 11:15AM- 1:15PM WEEKDAY, 6 -8PM WEEKDAY, 11AM -1PM SATURDAY alp, ry.: UecLm ey I xe,ny -tay trot th4 pa,, w•,Irc000, a .mdt 3. POSITION 1 IS JUST WEST OF THE SIDEWALK AT THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN 6500 FRANCE .3 oso ma m°wi°'`,°,,,Gyy ewy L— Py d:- .°wi"e4, AND POINT OF FRANCE. (1-50 AVERAGE IS 65.9 dBA. 60 dBA IS THE MPCA RULE FOR a xa.: o Bt, sN. - — gym..- aluln 316.03 b 3]6.16. MAXIMUM DAYTIME NOISE LEVELS.) - so• of a: rot. 4. POSITION 2 IS ON THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN 6500 FRANCE AND POINT OF FRANCE snsn. ce oet, �K N.— NORTHWEST OF THE COOLING TOWER. (L50 AVERAGE IS 55.4 dBA, WHICH IS WITHIN THE —, MPCA DAYTIME GUIDELINES.) POINT OF FRANCE ALLIANT 5. THE DECIBEL LEVEL NUMBERS ARE NOT CUMULATIVE. ENGINEERING. INC. DECIBEL EXHIBIT u+yARCerE SOVm. sutrz,00 t.......7= SMIS EOINA, MINNESOTA F.1 i,Im;so-vw /' l k 65TH STREET WEST CONGREGATE LIVING ❑ TRANSITIONAL CARE (ENTRY DRIVE GRAPHIC OUT El MEMORY CARE OF DATE. SEE SITE PLAN) PUBLIC ❑ CARE SUITES ACCESS Sem A 8 m ❑ COMMON SPACES private O ® se i� BARBER Private I 1 ssE UTY "" � ■ Studio Studio S11Jio Studio Studio 651 s.f. COVERED OROP�OFfl 4-9 ADMINISTRATIVE - ® 4a F. 3es a.f. 4m 1r. 4m s.r. ns a r. i COFFEE, 4-d B,ST RO q p LOUNGE • I,I OSF, b-6 ❑ :audio CIRCULATION GARAGE j T MLhIORY CARE 1T Ur,.:s ❑ SUPPORT � ENTRY BELOW Say SI1 i i rue PARKING P A Se1R1. Studio Sludio studio 511111 Srudia O PA, 1. )eSSf. )eS 0. Eo)s.f. 4431. F. )es s.f. �— ""v `^' r1 CONF. WOMEN SPA HITTING FITNC55 7 II I, sl. . ®® SITTING nn i , 9]55f. L , ° L&f.y ADMINISTRATION MEN LIVING rnu - v _ /v- w BISTRO MEMORY CARE SERVING an GARDEN (p��p) (p��p) [p��pJ r s BnNF 0 0 N•V .snr , DINING rI 70WN CENTER PHARMACY/ 7 ),]sE a.f. Oli T SHOP L .00. r ■ OC_— -� MARE ■14B Sf. [OMMERCUt .s CUOOIES ( > ( } C J II Neoot aEN I1r r tu- (p�)S OMING O�/[� -�} POPCORN/ Q..Q COMMUNITY 1. ® ONCESS10N5 q� q� ROOM ■ Na� ° p�n'��rppbA6 a 6 ° OZ4 jJ,I ICIIIITY FFO,a,��'l jp� � 6 a 6 A6 pByBp B groom Studio SI1Ji1 OOM TCIIEN c i t -1 a.f. 4)ess.f. LOU©1Eu TIIEATER Z3 ¢ ;QUJu I MC "�!ORV URE1r U,�i •s ]TION CHAPEL sal dip Z 2 � ) 'f' ( AR GE EL VA BedlOOm Srudia Studio SruJio S)uJio SruJie Studio Semi ]oo s.f. f. 40311. —J. a 0. 4o)s.f. 40]s.F. )es s.f. Privale FIRST FLOOR PLAN 30' 15' 0 30' Ca NORTH 6500 France Senior Housing EDINA, MINNESOTA AURORA 7- 19-2013 1 COMM917656 -13051 MOUNT I)EVELOPMENT CO, Investments, LLC Page 17 July 26, 2013 d { d` i POND Site Plan 6500 France Avenue ARCHITECTS INC 1 VjTj i I 1 I IREC �SEp GANAGE DOORS, Gw� LF�EL II I I t TENNIS c4unTS POINT OP FRANCE LOADING ZONE CUT NowyEEE�� I �ER,wA.TRRA..r I DIWD ROW PUB- C PUELI�SIDEWA4C I._ - SEATWC AREA DECDOMTIV�� � MT a,FTORY GEN'" NOUSINC SLUM IF IC;Ni OF FRANC C`IILLER AURORA ON FRANCE POINT OF FRANCE DELIVERY TRUCK PARKING OftfiLIM)VAW PLAA) I b FT. WEB PUBLIC IMINALK DECORATIVE COLOR —SnD MISfD PLA AREAS W /'SEA COLORfUVMFARTs Y PLANTW45' I �I O. I z� Imo{ I�{ IQI �I �I I I Page 3 C ty ouncil Update July 24, 2013 AURORA ID1'CS[OTe1H5• LLC MOIM'f DEVELOPMENT CO. _ OftfiLIM)VAW PLAA) . ............... 0 i �-- i --; LOW! i-=\ flizi 4' All 4 TT 11V�p i I MUM 4 TT 11V�p i I Y X01 ••r., dr�!!� L I h I II 4! � iir yGi�i�� Eli Z,.,- -.'. 1�1• '71`:r i'Ir I IYl 'Ar1 �YS• - � - • +/rte, ^,� y� ■Ir�r�i:G:GiG:�rii� I L i I _ -_ _ • -_ ____L r _u iY iiiiiiiiii�i!!• • �� -1.- I . 1 L AM NDC 1 I1h11(OQY F »�1, rr.v■_ Irr �r.� � ■■ � IIr /rr �. r>•1�1�>• �.�� INlr�ir �1`rrtin �.�. ■1111 \ /r.�.rr /Ir /,.� ■■ .■r ■■�/lrr�l��= rlr� � IA _ �■ 1as.■r■s1lrr�l���srl�i: r +��4 %`V�M���iii� 10 All 4� 410 1 �' •��i�^�lfA iT IMCE J.w..J &QT C Page 6 City Council Update View From Point Of France Looking at Top Crown July 26, 2013 EDWARD FARR AURORA ON F'RAlNIC� AURORA %�,,,� 1-111 0 ARCHITECTS INC T.'" nt. "LLC, _ MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. P PLAV Page 10 View Looking at Terrace City Council chat Y EDWARDFARR AURORA ON FRANCE AURORA 1 0 ARCHITECTS INC r„V"t, „encs, i,Lc MOUNTDEVELOPMENTCO. _ OREL44 I*QA14Y I f, A). lJi J Page 7 City Council Update View Looking Northwest July 26, 2013 EDWARD FARR AURORA ON FRANCE AURORA ARCHITECTS INC ' ^m.t^u ^t.,'.Lc MOUNT DEVELOPMENT CO. PREUM11441 ALAN JI 11111 LJ f' ' I,�� �� • , Oil- rh u� r� ,rI DATE: November 5, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: Chad Millner — City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 6500 France Avenue — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. Survey 1. Utility easements were drafted for a prior building version, an update will be required. Soils 2. Submit soils, soil boring and geotechnical report. Details 3. Update all City standard plates to current http: / /edinamn.gov /index.phl2?section = construction standards Traffic and Street 4. A traffic and parking study (WSB and Associated 7/26/2013) shows adequate parking, and no undue burden on the transportation network. 5. Provide pedestrian lighting along France Avenue and also along West 65' Street. (Example Attached) a. The pedestrian lighting along West 65' Street shall match the pedestrian lighting used on West 66' Street from France Avenue to York Avenue, see City Standard Plate 625: http: / /edinamn.gov /edinafies /files /City Offices/ Engineering / Construction %20Standards %20Plates / ConstructionStandard s_625. pdf. b. The pedestrian lighting along France Avenue shall match the pedestrian lighting proposed for the France Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Project. See the Canto G detail attached with two luminaires, the lower one directed to the sidewalk. 6. Curb cut permit will be required for relocation or modification of driveway entrances. Follow standards in curb cut permit application: httl2: / /edinamn.gov /edinafiles /files /City Offices /Public Works /CurbCutApplication.pdf 7. Crosswalk intersection improvements shall include white thermoplastic blocks across both 65' Street and France Avenue and shall include installation of ADA pedestrian ramps. S. Traffic signal sight lines, and Emergency Vehicle Preemption system (EVP) on traffic signal on France may be blocked by skyway. Provide design schematics showing sight lines approaching from west, and propose modifications to signal as necessary. 9. Provide private maintenance agreement for skyway. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwXdWaMN gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 �5� L Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Developer's agreement will be required for the realignment of public water main and the installation of public sidewalk. 11. City requires realignment of watermain at SE corner of property in France Avenue. a. With realignment, watermain is not necessary along east property line. b. Make water service connection off of France Avenue watermain near the NE corner of the property. c. Extend watermain and a fire hydrant to the front entrance off 65' Street, near the out driveway. 12. Remove sanitary sewer to downstream manhole on southwest property corner. 13. Expose sanitary manhole 4680 on south property line, confirm location and bring to grade. 14. A revised SAC unit determination will be required at building permit application. Storm Water Utility 15. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic calculations. 16. Point of France pond outlet elevation is 862.9, 10 year elevation is 864.4 and 100 year elevation is 865.9. Provide summary of hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to confirm proper capacity under backwater conditions. Confirm no backflow potential from drains near garage that may cause sanitary inflow. 17. A separate permit is required from 9MCWD Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 18. Provide erosion, sediment control plan that meets provisions of MPCA construction site general permit. Reference notes on detail sheet on ESC plan. Provide permanent erosion control for down spout locations. Other Agency Coordination 19. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits are required. These permits may have been started under the previous iteration, but need to be revised and resubmitted. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwXAWaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 our OUT IN i IN WEST 61 TENNIS COURTS Site Plan POND 6500 France,/ I I ucuuuu . a..f Z I f Iu� I�f !�f I I EDWARD FARR AURORA INC EDINA DICAL. P /\ MOUNCA AftlOcti 14JEMCAL Rolte7 . N 6, 2012 FS-R1 FS-HUVTTX[-MFAP id OUT. OUT IN IN. 65TH STREET WEST T Nil 0 0 I'M, 11 E2 7�1 IT Li MUM r . 14cut APA MENT m BUILDING -A .............. r%—RD THIJOUU1. Sill rL rXw 7f. EEN� �• Lzu II PARKING'70M MEDICAL OFFICE BLDG. AA-\A I LL, ts— GAZEBO TENNIS C) I COURTS POINT OF F CE 0 R LOADING ZONE 9 O'Lp, v m V, E ICrE N POND PARKING Site Plan 6500 France COOLIN lNovember 6, 2012 EDWARD INC ARCHITECTS INC EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA AURORA I-voi.-MO-W 0 /\-1— 11 MOUMMEMOMIENTC0. AttRw60 Aft)CAL 1Aalfc 7 Northeast Aerial EDWARD FARR EDINA MEDICAL PLAZA ARCHITECTS INC November 6, 2012 0 AURORA _. MOUNC DEVELOPMENT CO. NorthwestAerial November 6, 2012 - EDWARD P FARR EDINA MEDICAL, LAN. a AURORA ARCHITECTS INC m wLLC - MOUNT OCVGLOPMENT CO. "'A" Infrastructure o Engineering © Planning a Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & Amodares, [tic. Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum DATE: June 26, 2013 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Public Works Director City of Edina FROM. Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE: Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -43 Background Traffic and Parking Studies were completed in April, June and October 2012 documenting the anticipated impacts the proposed redevelopment of both 6500 France Avenue and 4005 65th Avenue sites would have on the adjacent roadway system. The site and proposed redevelopment has again been revised. This memorandum provides an updated review of the traffic and parking impacts, based on the revised site plan and development proposal. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The revised development plan includes a change in the proposed use on the site from medical office to a senior housing and skilled care facility. The current approved plan for the site includes a 102,965 sf medical office building with a 548 vehicle parking ramp. The new proposed senior housing and skilled care facility will include 209 units with 144 parking spaces. In addition, the current approved plan included two full movement access locations on 65th Street and a right out only access to southbound France Avenue. Access to the existing sites is currently provided at two (2) full movement driveway locations from 65th Street to each property (four driveways). All access to the proposed development plan will be from 65th Street at two locations. The primary access to the underground parking will be on the west side of the site. A second access will be located in the center of the site and will be utilized for visitor drop -offs. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and anticipated development were evaluated at the site access locations as well as the primary impacted intersections and driveway along 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road. The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated traffic and parking impacts for the proposed redevelopment. Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 2 of 11 Existing Traffic Characteristics France Avenue (CSAH 17) is north /south a 6 -lane divided Arterial roadway from south of 66th Street to north of 65th Street. Primary access to York Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The posted speed limit on France Avenue in the vicinity of the site is 40 mph. 65th Street 65th Street is an east /west City street with numerous access driveways. The existing roadway configuration includes a single lane in each direction with a continuous center left turn lane (three lane section). All the driveway access points are controlled with stop signs, stopping the exiting movements from the developments. A 30 mph speed limit is posted on this roadway. The two primary intersections along the 65th Street corridor are at France Avenue and Valley View Road. Both France Avenue and Valley View Road are classified as "A" Minor Arterials providing regional access to the area. Both intersections are controlled with traffic control signals. The lane configurations at each are as follows. 65th Street at France Avenue SB France Ave approaching 65th St — one through /right, two through, one left NB France Ave approaching 65th St — one through/right, two through, one left EB 65th St approaching France Ave — one through/right, one left WB 65th St approaching France Ave — one right, one through /left 65th Street/TH 62 off ramp at Valley View Road SB Valley View Rd approaching 65th St — one through, one left NB Valley View Rd approaching 65th St — one through/right, two through EB TH 62 off ramp approaching Valley View Rd — one free right, one through/left WB 65th St approaching Valley View Rd — one right /left AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were conducted along 65th Street at each access driveway, the intersection of France Avenue at 65th Street and the intersection of Valley View Road at 65th Street/TH 62 off ramp the week of February 20th, 2012. Figure 3 shows the intersections and driveways along the corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study and, Figure 4 shows the existing 2012 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the existing lane configuration. The traffic count data is included in the Appendix. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed development will occur between existing conditions and any given future year due to other growth and development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts on in the area traffic has stayed constant or dropped in the past few years. In order to account for some background growth in traffic a.05% per year factor was applied to the through traffic on 65th Street, France Avenue and - Valley View Road to the 2014 and 2030 analysis years. I4-4 Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 3 of 11 In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic. Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion — The proposed plan includes the expansion of the emergency center, urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The proposed expansion consists of a 77,500 sf (gross area), two -story building located on the north side of the existing hospital building. This project has been approved by the City Council. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 20.14 and 2030 analysis. Southdale Residential - The City recently approved the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. The site is located in the northwest quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. It is assumed that this project will not be open and included as part of the 2014 analysis but, will be fully leased and included in the 2030 background traffic. Additional Southdale Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was detennined that following the renovations, the mall would have an additional 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all space will be occupied by 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2014 and 2030 analysis. Future Restaurant Development — A future restaurant is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will not be developed by 2014 but, will be open and included as part of the 2030 background traffic. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional development traffic is based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition. The table shows the AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Table I - Estimated Additional Baektrround Trip Generation Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Hospital Expansion 77,500 sf 36 21 15 24 10 14 Apartments 232 units 118 24 94 144 94 50 Shopping Center 143,880 sf 138 86 52 533 256 277 Restaurant 8000 sf 87 48 39 79 47 32 Total New Trips 1 379 1 179 200 780 407 1 373 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition A63 Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 4 of 11 Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed ultimate redevelopment is shown below in Table 2. The trip generation rates used to estimate the proposed site traffic are based on extensive surveys of the trip - generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the total daily, AM peak hour and PM. peak hour trip generation for the proposed site. Table 2 - Estimated Site Trip Generation Use Size (units) ADT AM Peak PM Peak Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Assisted Living 59 157 78 79 9 6 3 13 6 7 Independent Living 50 101 51 50 3 2 1 9 4 5 Skilled Nursing Care 40 96 48 48 6 1 4 2 1 7 3 4 Memory Care 40 96 48 48 6 4 2 7 3 4 Observation Care Rooms 20 48 24 24 3 2 1 4 2 2 Total New Trips 498 249 249 1 27 18 9 1 40 18 22 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Trip Distribution Site - generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on the population distribution relative to the site and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve it. The Trip Distribution was assumed as follows: 25% north on France Avenue 20% south on France Avenue 10% from the Hospital across France Avenue 10% north on Valley View Road 5% south on Valley View Road 30% from west on TH 62 Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2014 which is the year the proposed development would be completed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 5 of 11 The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non - development background traffic growth to the existing 2013 traffic counts to determine the "No- Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated Aurora on France traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the `Build" traffic conditions. Figures S and 6 show the projected 2014 and 2030 Build AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Operations Existing and /or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the impacted intersections and access driveway adjacent to the hospital. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 1. Existing Conditions 2. Projected 2014 Build 3. Projected 2030 Build This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Existing and /or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the intersections of 65th Street at France Avenue, 65th Street at Valley View Road, the existing driveways on 65th Street, the proposed development site driveways on 65th Street and the right -out only site access to France Avenue. This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations. Analysis Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign - controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and /or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through- street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un- signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un- signalized intersections are, slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric nmprovements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. X45 Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 6 of 11 Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. A66 Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un- Signalized A < 10 <_ 10 B 10 -20 10 -15 C 20 -35 15 -25 D 35 -55 25 -35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80. > 50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches ") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low- volume legs by converting a two -way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low- volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro /SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning- movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. SimTraffic is a micro - simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. A66 Vft Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 7 of 1 ] Existinz Level of Service Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the two primary intersections on 65th Street as well as the existing site driveways and adjacent development driveway based on the current lane geometry and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operation at LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours with all movements operating at LOS D or better. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table 4 - Existing Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2014 which is the year proposed Aurora on France would be developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5.. All of the intersections are expected to continue to operate at similar levels of service after the redevelopment as prior to the redevelopment. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table S shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the intersection of France Avenue at 65th Stree. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue potential issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns may exist. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn -lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. U, AMPeak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Delay LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) 65th Street at France Ave C (D) 20.3 B. (D) 19.8 65th Street at Valley View Rd B (D) 13.8 B (D) 12.5 65t Street at 6500 Site A (A) 1.0 A (A) 1.2 Driveway 65t Street at 4005 Site A (A) 0.5 A (A) 0.4 Driveway 65t Street at Adjacent A (A) 0.5-2.2 A (A) 0.4-2.7 Development Driveways C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2014 which is the year proposed Aurora on France would be developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5.. All of the intersections are expected to continue to operate at similar levels of service after the redevelopment as prior to the redevelopment. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table S shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the AM and PM peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the intersection of France Avenue at 65th Stree. By 2030 the analysis indicates that at the intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue potential issues on the 65th Street approaches and France Avenue left turns may exist. With minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn -lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C with 20 to 25 sec delays. U, 4V Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 8 of 11 Table S — Forecast Build with Development Intersection 2014 2030 AM,Peak• Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Overall Delay sec /veh) LOS Overall Delay sec/veh) LOS f Overall Delay (sec /veh ) LOS Overall 'Delay (sec /veh 65`h St at France Ave C (D) 21.3 B (D) 19.8 C (D) 23.2 D (E) 37.4 65`h St at Valley View Rd B (D) 14.3 B (D) 14.8 B (D) 14.5 B (D) 17.8 65`h St at West Site Access A (C) 1.1 A (A) 1.3 A (C) 1.2 A (C) 1.8 65`h St at East Site Access A(A) 0.4 A(A) 0.5 A (A) 0.8 A(A) 1.0 St at Adjacent De velopment Driveways De A(A) 0.8-2.2 A(A) 0.5-2.7 A (A) 0.8-2.4 A (A) 0.5-2.8 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Vehicle Oueuinz Analysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2014 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the driveways and intersections on 65`h Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no- build and build 2014 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridor do not exceed any of the available turn lanes storage. In some cases however, the maximum queues were exceeded. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In most cases the queues exceed the storage in the continuous left turn lane, therefore only blocking the adjacent driveway and not impacting through traffic. The potential future mitigation at the 65`h Street and France Avenue intersection discussed above will improve the flow of traffic on 65`h Street and also minimize traffic blocking the hospital entrance. Additional signage could also be added indicating "do not block intersection" and /or "no left turns during peak hours" at the hospital entrance should this become an issue. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. A6% I , 4filb, Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 9 of I I Parking Demand The parking demand for the proposed development was analyzed based on anticipated uses on the site. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4`h Edition. Table 6 below shows a summary of each potential uses, the estimated parking generation rate and what the anticipated peak parking demand would be for a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case condition for the parking on the site assuming the proposed uses. Table 6 — Site Parking Demand per ITE Use Size Rate. Spaces Assisted Living 59 0.41 spaces/unit 25 Independent Living 50 1.00 spaces/unit 50 Skilled Nursing Care 40 0.48 spaces/unit 20 Memory Care 40 0.48 spaces/unit 20 Observation Care Rooms 20 0.48 spaces /unit 10 Total Parking Demand 1 1 125 The current City Code would require a total of 138 parking spaces for the proposed development. Currently the proposed site is estimating 144 spaces available. Table 7 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Table 7 — Parking Required per City Code Use Size Rate Spaces Assisted Living 59 0.75 per unit + 1 per employee 60 Independent Living 50 0.75 per unit + 1 per employee 53 Skilled Nursing Care 40 1 per 4 beds 10 Memory Care 40 1 per 4 beds 10 Observation Care Rooms 20 1 per 4 beds 5 Total Parking Demand 1 1 138 Based on the results of the parking analysis, it can be concluded that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for the proposed senior housing and skilled care facility. 40 Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 10 of 11 Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed Senior Housing and Skilled Care Facility project including planned 209 units is anticipated to generate an additional 27 trips in the AM peak hour and 40 trips in the PM peak hour. • Additional trips will be generated from other approved or anticipated development in the surrounding area. These uses will generate an additional 379 trips in the AM peak hour and 780 trips in the PM peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways in the study area on 65tth Street are all operating at overall LOS D or better for the both the AM and PM peak hours. • Traffic operations at the intersections and driveway on 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road with or without the proposed site development for the forecasted conditions in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. • The intersection of 65th Street and France Avenue may have potential delay issues with full development in 2030. With the minor intersection and signal improvements (additional turn lane length and signal phasing changes), these issues would be minimized, improving the overall intersection LOS back to a C. • The results of the queuing analysis found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing, and future no -build and build 2014 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. • The proposed site plan provides parking to meet both City Code and anticipated parking generation based on ITE guidelines. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Provide the proposed roadway internal roadway improvements as shown on the proposed site plan (Figure 2). 2. Although no improvements to the France Avenue at 65th Street intersection are specifically required at this time. Should delays and queuing become an issue in the future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these improvements be required in the future the Aurora on France Senior Housing development will be responsible for their share of those improvements. 3. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Aurora on France Senior Housing project. A7D 4 a%,. Aurora on France Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina June 26, 2013 Page 11 of 11 JiVe., 3 A a; X47 � o 'v\ w E�R � x 4. �uu �, ,. �J - N Z0 V/ EW QR J ( CH < \/ (q ❑ N a CU RVE 2a W. 62 nd ST. S2nd ST� 3, W, w 62 nd ST. Q w x o ( < a x a Z q, GpRRI SON w > w x 35. (q > v a a a _ 0 700 ft 1400 ft L' ST. 35. 0:36' ° w w w w > ° w 0 o > a a J o m W 64 th ST. a ST. 64 Lt h] ST. a tMlNESOTA z r W. 64th Y 0� � a a a a a • W L) 3 0 J Z w a sS UJ a W. 0 65 th 57, �� th ST. O J Z U Z w, 3 U a w Cr > x Lake Cr ' a a m h ST. N Cr d z W. 66th 000° of a p 00 O O i a Cornelia Project SOUTH a ALE o z Gy cc Q C1R. �o N o� oA, o a Location 2' the UTA �� LPG 68 th x ROYCA S T, m RD. BALFANZ o \? Q �f P� TON UPPER RD. �� �P 'a > P WI TER• o JUDS ON �Zq o 69th <FDpD WAY w x-� LA. ��� �� W. 69th ST. LJ o ST, pU 6 o o 000000 0 pq 38. N ERRY o q,a J O p J Q G 0 70th o > w ST. �DL Li o a qnn w LAR,I- o ANDOVER RD. � MAVELL Ew Z m r a w v) SAG BEL VIDERE ° J ASPgsl 9 CLgR f �� LA. J _ R DR. HAZELTON RO• Cr 9 r N ORE ( w o v w Y w[ TRt� �q ASPASIA CIR �qRf M =o a J o x LCa N `rGM ( C1R. DUNygM DU,v DRf W. _ 72 nd ST, r v R SWy y Rw Z Cre o 3 HIBISCUS x a O i DR. w v CtT�(? o Q _ -J a AVE. COQ O F0 w F- a r a 0 ° > DELL DR. w ,, OR. -J PHLOX 3 Z= UJ w z r o GILFORD DR. 3- o° u z m LA. a wU o v W-- 4th HIBISCUS > Y > a CT' o w ST. Lake a a a ° PARKLAWAI c0 c AVE. ST. Edina o SODOM o �p�� o W. 75th QOPPy SORE Lp• w P PLAZA r r DR. a a W. 76th 3 ST. —1 F-1 x BLVD. Y Gr a —» 77th ST. as � > a � FOR. N w X14A, M Traffic Impact Study e l` Aurora on France (6500 France Avenue) / Senior Housing Development City of Edina, Minnesota Figure 1 Project Location Map 1 M r W-W L RAMP �, - ?ej tu 0 CI 0 1A d k W a' am 8: - - FS HOSPITA ar n, i - u�u�r" r � oa:A rwi nea – r rJ't» –z— 1 APaRTMcNT •�• l!� ! - _ I EDILDiSG mr i I SERVICE COURT I S TENMS . • 1 ._.. � - -... i COURTS OF FRANCE ' POINT OF FRANCE DEI.IYERT VEHICLE LOADING ZONE PARKM Air � POND COOLING _ ...TOWER r EDWARDFARR AURORA t -.= ARCHITECTS IKC °' " ""` "` 1--:__ HCl lTPL�LLCiiWTCP -- �T Traffic Impact Study Figure 2 e Aurora on France (6500 France Avenue) Senior Housing Development City of Edina, Minnesota Proposed Site Plan d k W a' am 8: - - FS HOSPITA ar n, i - u�u�r" r � oa:A rwi nea – r rJ't» –z— 1 APaRTMcNT •�• l!� ! - _ I EDILDiSG mr i I SERVICE COURT I S TENMS . • 1 ._.. � - -... i COURTS OF FRANCE ' POINT OF FRANCE DEI.IYERT VEHICLE LOADING ZONE PARKM Air -4 • ,��,• - Tom:-- r - ,N -I � Nil Ir itfH ate Vic - 64h Street rJ •, �x, ' � � + � t1 IFr1 1f, .r •' �!' {'(��rT11Fl t •' m t1i 11ttill [NSB ` e Z Traffic Impact Study Figure 3 Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) Intersection Location Map City of Edina, Minnesota A7`+ 29(254) — 60(11) — 139( 11) D+-r �t 179(376) 0 ( 0) o 4i 26(229) o fi 61(156) 6) 43 (96) j j. 6(20) AL r 2( 1) A r 0( 5) . j j 4 50(51)) (42) 39 t t r ( 8) 53 .0 ( 3) 76 J (131) 73 1 ti t t (80) 294 1y (155) 330 '_► o ( 217) 277 'i+ o 1 93)196 —r (232)489 7 ( 0) 1 ( 5) 9 (108) 37 '` •-- ,. 2r _, ,�. I r ♦ r . MOW M . ! ik i' F Vft 6 7 8 9 2( 1) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) o s s 0 0 37(271) o c L 76(237) c o 4. 199(167) o e 4. 209(167) .ti 0 ( 0) r 1 ( 5) r 5 ( 2) 0 ( 0) LEGEND (1)0} (0)0-0 Y (0)0 (162) 383 B o ( 217) 354 ^ m ( 327) 302 'S► ( 332) 305 �► o o AM (PM) Peak xxX (0) 0 4) 4 1) 2 0) 0 — — — — xxx ( ( ( ( � Hour Turning Movements. Traffic Impact Study Figure 4 Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements W 36 ( 249) a i 0 ( 0) l V 18 ( 32) ( 42) 39 t t �► (85) 298 J. — (232)489 N i 60 ( 11) 43(236) or 2( 1) ( 8) 53 J (174) 341 •� o ( 0) 1 139 ( 11) o 75(162) ,A. r 9 ( 6) ( 3) 76 ( 237) 290 'Z► u; o (4)7 — +.rW 187 (3") S 46(100) . j j �. 56 ( 57) (140) 78 j t t ( 97) 201 " _► (117) 40 t M� ® -- -- - r �a'•� � % rR1 tf ff�� "� Y � lrSli r � iE r �' r \ t(tyllttlt� `1 � - 1 .IAiW...n s � ;�•�% •- •. � + "iii s n . - - Est �1 ern(^'�rMw1i aoWIN Irc�rrr .` 1t } 'ill 9. z •�• ` ��_� Jai J/y �, r i. � _S_ . � t .i � i _.�__! 2( 1) 0( 0) 0( 0) 54(278) o o 93(244) 0 0 0 [— 224 (179) ,At o ( o) .A. r 1( 5) 0 ( o) (1)0 -V (0)0 a V (0) 0 Y LEGEND o 0 (181) 394 —► o o ( 236) 365 V .n (352) 319 -•► o N AM (PM) Peak (o) o _ _ 4) 4 V v ( 0) 0 XXX(XXX) Hour Turning Movements WSB' Traffic Impact Study Figure 5 (e } Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 Peak Hour Turning Movements A 0 66(280) 60( 11) 139( 11) 0( 0) L 213(440) N 0( 0) o �. 13(269) L. 105(195) o o `- F 253(201) J 4r 52(113) I ik 18 ( 32) A r 2 ( 1) A r 9 ( 6) r 2 ( 2) +! 41 1A 63 ( 64) ( 42) 39 t t �► ( 8) 53 -0 ( 3) 76 .0 Y ( 0) 0 -- (158) 88 -0 t t (109) 324 .% s ( 218) 3B2 -r P o o ( 281) 331 •_! o (396) 360 �,► 8 0 0 (110) 228 '_► m. ( 232) 489 7 V _, ( 0) 1 V V ( 4) 7 V y ( 1) 2 V V (130) 45 IW PIK 1 � a`' � • � / t tli ft4 [tv V. A-7 2( 1) 0( 0) o 0( 0) 0 0 j— 84(309) o o N 41. 123 (277) 0 0 F 254(201) 0 ( 0) (0)0 r 1( 5) 0 ( 0) LEGEND (22S)435 s o (280)406 'j► °o (396)360 �► o AM (PM) Peak XXX(XXX) Hour Turning ( 0) 0 ( 4) q ( 0) D — A Movements WSB ^� AS. Traffic Impact Study Figure 6 }y Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) } .. City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Peak Hour Turning Movements A-7 wsej Traffic Impact Study Figure 3 Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota Intersection Location Map J ��® y P� p ti ' L 4��, � ;.F ffIwhi l4tfitlil'C� i f4;•. y'f fit', Fitllri wsej Traffic Impact Study Figure 3 Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota Intersection Location Map J ��® y P� n 29 ( 254) 60 ( 11) 139 ( 11) 0 ( 0) — IN6 179 ( 376) a ti 0 ( 0) o 26(2.29) 0 4i 61 (156) o o f 204 (168) rn *r 43 ( 96) tt 8 ( 20) A r 2 ( 1) ,A. r 0 ( 5) r 5 ( 0) ,i 44 t• 50 ( 51) (42) 39 t t ( 8) 53 J Y ( 3) 76 J Y ( 0) 0 Y (131) 73 J t t f► (80) 294 ,.% (155) 330 (217) 277 '_► o o e (332) 305 '_► R o o (93)196 s (232)489 7 y `" ( 0) 1 y ( 5) 9 _. ( 1) 2 V V (108) 37 � J l -t 2 a 3 !•fir.. +.. .( < < "rite �' WWI two(, 4 4 91 ( it / J ` 5 7 1 "•( r" } r 1 2( 1) 0( 0) 0( 0) a( 0) 0 0 4L 37 ( 211) o o e 4S. 76 ( 237) 0 0 a. 199 (167) o 0 o F 209 (167) JA 0 ( 0) ,IS, r 1 ( 5) r 5 ( 2) 0 ( 0) LEGEND ( 1) 0 J ( 0) a J ( 0) a Y 10) 0 M (162) 383 o o ( 217) 354 ._► o e (327) 302 �! y o ( 332) 305 ^r o 0 AM (PM) Peak ( 0) 9 _ — " - 0) 0 — '— XXX(XXX) Hour Turning (4) 4 (1) 2 ( • i WO BI �I Traffic Impact Study Figure 4J �( } Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) �. City of Edina, Minnesota Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements A7q 1 36(249) 60(11) _ 139(11) 0( 0) t 187(388) 9 N 0( 0) a 4L 43(236) 75(162) o e 223(179) e v 46(100) 18 ( 32) .A, or 2 ( 1) ar 9 ( 6) Ir 2 ( 2) .1 j j { 56 ( 57) ( 42) 39 t t ( 8) 53 1 ( 3) 76 J ( 0) 0 (140) 78 J wj t t I. ( 85) 298 J. (174) 341 o o a ( 237) 290 =► o V' (352)31 o o (97) 201 '�► .ten-, i (232)489 '71 ( 0) 1 r ( 4) 7 V v ( 1) 2 V V (117) 40 '._.77 _'O )•,4 r, 1r 1 r At � e ,4, . 7 8 '! 9 r� Ht 2( 1) 0( 0) 0( 0) 4L 54 ( 276) o o e�. 93 (244) o o �. 224 (179) AL 0 ( 0) AL or 1( 5) 0 ( 0) ( 1) a ( 0) 0 T ( 0) p wr LEGEND (161) 394 o o Z+ (236)365 (352) 319 --o- o AM (PM) Peak ( p) p XXX(XXX) Hour Turning (q) 4 (0) 0 V V A Movements WSB Traffic Impact Study Figure 5 �(} Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 Peak Hour Turning Movements Ht �f 9 2( 1) 0( o) 0( o) 84 ( 309) ° ° 4L. 123 ( 217) ° o ° t-. 254 ( 201) AL 0( 0) AL r 1( 5) 0( 0) (1)0 (0) 0 -0 (0) 0 LEGEND _ (225)435 o° a (280)406 ^j► ^. °° �° (396)360 R ° AM (PM) Peak (o> o — v (4) 4 V V (o) o XXX(XXX) Hour Turning A i Movements WSBJ w °1• g Traffic Impact Study Figure 6 e Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) (.� l City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Peak Hour Turning Movements ft 66(280) ° 60( 11) ° 139( 11) 0( 0) (440) 0( 0) o 73(269) ° 105(195) ° ° o 253(201) (113) j A 18 ( 32) ,A, r 2 ( 1) � r 9 ( 6) r 2 ( 2) (64) 42) 39 t t ( 8) 53 -0 ( 3) 76 .0 ( 0) 0 f %(130)45— (109)324 � (218)382 'T'► ° ° (281)331 -r u; ° (396)360 �► o ° o V FL- ( 232) 489 91 _. ( 0) 1 - ( 4) 7 ( 1) 2 �f 9 2( 1) 0( o) 0( o) 84 ( 309) ° ° 4L. 123 ( 217) ° o ° t-. 254 ( 201) AL 0( 0) AL r 1( 5) 0( 0) (1)0 (0) 0 -0 (0) 0 LEGEND _ (225)435 o° a (280)406 ^j► ^. °° �° (396)360 R ° AM (PM) Peak (o> o — v (4) 4 V V (o) o XXX(XXX) Hour Turning A i Movements WSBJ w °1• g Traffic Impact Study Figure 6 e Aurora on France Senior Housing Development (6500 France Avenue) (.� l City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Peak Hour Turning Movements ft simrrzlfic S m Wauon summary 6!2412013 Existing AM Peak Mour Measures of Elf.dWeness K: \01 6 66- 4 3 0 \Traffic \Existing MOES TAB: [AM MOEs[ A � 3— 626/2013 'vv ©moo v mo ® ®oom ®mo ©o © ®mo ® ©non�o : mmmm ®ommm mnnmmonm ©nm ®omm�00000�o m ® ©������ mmmn ®m�mm�mnmmm�mnnnn ®o mm��� ®��� !mmm��mnm�nonm ®m���eoo ®o mmmme�mmmm mnnnneennmm�nmmnnnneem te��mmmmmmmm mnn ©nn ® ©mn ®nemmemmnnnmte mmmmmmmmm meneeennnmm�emmeeneeemte mmmmmmmmm mnnn�emnnmm�mmmmm�nnemte !��������� . mneeennsemm�emmnnnnen�e mm ®������ m ©eee© ©ems ®nmmm ®mmneemte mme ©� ©��� mmnmemnmmnm ® ® ®m ®e ®onomte m ®mmmmmmm mm�oo ©mom ©mnmmm ®mmnnomo m ©mommmmm mmnnmmnnnnm ©mmmmmmnnnme IEmnnn©©nnnmmnmmmmnnnnnm memn ©mmnmmmnmmmmmnmmnm m m ©mmmmmm mmm�mnmemnmemmmnmmmnnm m mmmmmmm mnnmmnmmnmmnmmmnmmnnnon mmmmmmmm mennenn ®nnmeemmnmmeeemte mmmmmmmmm mmemm ®emeemnmmm ®nmeee ®e mm ®mmmmmm mm ®nne�m�neemmmmmmnnnmte mmmmmmmmm mennmmnnnmmnmmmmmmnnnmte mmmmmmmmm m ©momo�omnmoo ®m ®monnnm,o m ©m ©mmmmm m00000nnn0000mmoononnmto mmmmmmmmm mnm ©enm ©�nmemmmnmmnnnmte mmmmmmmmm mnnneennnmm�omm000eeemto mmmmmmmmm omm�mnnnn ®eoommmmnnnemto mmmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnnnmoemmnnnoeemte mmmmmmmmm mnm ©mn� ©mmm�emmnmoneomto mmmmmmmmm monnonnnomm�ommnn�nnemto�� mmmmmmmmm mmm�nommm�enemmmm�eonm,o mmmmmmmmm mnnnoonnnnmoemmnnnennmto mmmmmmmmm mnnmm� ®n ®nmeemmn ®neon ®e mmmmmmmmm mm ®mmm� ®n © ® ©mmm� ®m000�o mm ®mmmmmm momlm®ommmoomo ®mwmmnnom.o mmmmmmmmm m ®mm�nmm�nm © ©mm�� ®nnnmte m ®mme ®mmm mmmme ©em�om ©mmmn ®�enn�o mm ®m ®mmmm K: \01 6 66- 4 3 0 \Traffic \Existing MOES TAB: [AM MOEs[ A � 3— 626/2013 simTraffic simufalion summary 6124/2013 E[isling PM Peak Hour Measures of Effecli—ess K:101 666 -03 0 %Traffic\E,dsfing MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] � -3 6126/2013 m� ®n�� ®e�� ©oam���enee ®e �m ®m�mmmm meeeeeeeoeeeemmeeeeee�e �mmm�mmmm me ®e ®ems © ®e ®e�mme��eee�e mmmm ®mmmm mee ©eee © ©eeeemmeeeoee�e �emm�mmmm me�e�o�e�e ©e ©mm��esee�e mamma ®mmm Ramp meeneaeeeeesemm�eeeee�e �a ®m�mmmm m����e ®��e ©e ©mm��eoee�e��mmmm�mmmm mmom�mem� ©e ®�mm�e� eee ®e m ®mm�mmmm me ®n�o�o�e ©e ©mm ®�eeee�o m ©mm�mmmm - meee ® ©ee�eeeem;m�e ©eee ®e .. �emm�mmmm m © ®e�e�e� ©eeemm ©�esee�e mam ®�mmmm meeeeeeeseeeemmeeeeee�e �mmm�mmmm me ®e ®ems © ®e ©semme��eee�e �mmm�mmmm m ©ee�ee ©�ee�emm�e�oee�e me ®m�mmmm m�e���em� ®ememm�e ®ooe�e m ®mm�mmmm m © ® © ® ©�e�ees ©mm��eeee�e Mme ®�mmmm m ©eee ©eee ®e ©emm ®e�eee�e . me ®m�mmmm m ©�o� ©�o�000mm� ®�0000�o mmmm�mmmm mooe000000000mm000000�o mmmm�mmmm me ®owe ®own ®e ®mme��eoe�o mmmm�mmmm 1:111hS11,111 I'll W1, ' mooneee0000nemm ®eooeo ®e • mam������ me�e�o�n�e�o�mmn�eoee�o mmmm�mmmm meonnenneeoeemmneeeoe�e mmmm�mmmm me ®e ®e ®o�eooammo�eeeo�e mmmm ©mmmm meeneoe000000mm�eeee��o ma ®m�mmmm me�e�n�n�nen�mmo ®oeee ®e mmmm�mmmm me ®n ®e ®n ®e°•' ooe�me ®oeee ®e m���m���� K:101 666 -03 0 %Traffic\E,dsfing MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] � -3 6126/2013 s0nTmffic Simulation summary 0/24/2013 2011 AM Peak Hcur Measures or Effectiveness K:\01686- 430 \Traffic\2014 MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] Aq 6/26/2013 monomomm�n ®mom coo ® ®000 ®o�� mmmm ®comma mmnmmmemonooemm�neoeomo mmmmmmmmm mmnnnm�mm�en ©mm�meennmo me ®mmmmmm. mmnmmmnmm� ©mmmmmomoonme mmmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnneennmmnnnnneme mmmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnnn ©n ©mmmmnnnmm� mmmmmmmmm mennesnnennnnmmmnneemmM mm ®mmmmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmmmnnemmM mmmmmnmmm Ramp mnnM=nnesnnnemmnmmnnmm� Mmmmmmmmm mnmmMnemnene®mmmmmnnnMM mmm®mmmmm mmn®emnmm ®e ©emm®n®nnnme m ©mmmmmmm m®monUMNSHMn®mm®mmnnnme mmmmmmmmm m®nnnnnemnnnemMnmmnnnMM • : mmmmmmmmm mennnennnn =n =mmmmnnnmm" mmn®mmmm MnnnnnnnnennnmMmnnnnnMM M©mmmmmm mnnennmenn =e =mmmmnennme Mmmmmmmm mnnnnnnneneenm mmnmennMMII mnmmmmmm mnnn®nnnms ® ©nmm®®mennme mmm®mnmmm mnmmnnmmnnnnnmmmmmnnnMM mnemmmmmm mane ®nnmm�en ®m�mmmnnnMM M®eemmmmm mnnnnnnneeennm mnnnneeme�� mmmmmmmmm m ©me ® ©woMo ©a ©mm ®monoomo mmmmmmmmm m000000000000mm000nnnmo mmmmmmmmm mnm © ®nn ©con ®e ®mmnmmnnnme mmmm ©mmmm mono ©en ©nnonem m ®n�nonmo�� m ©mmmmmmm menone®mm=©n ©mmnMnnn o mmmmmmmmm mennnnnnnnnnommennnnnmo mmmmmmmmm momnmonomn ®n ®come ®onon ®e mmmmmommm mm�nnm ®nme ©o ©mm��mnonme��mmmmm Immmmmmmmm Imm ®mmm mmmnnmmnn ® © ®mmMMMMnnnme m nn �mn� ®m ©mmmMnnnnnMM m®mmm®mmm �mmnmm ©nmmnennfmmmmnooemo ®m ®mmmm K:\01686- 430 \Traffic\2014 MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] Aq 6/26/2013 StnTraRc Simulation Summary 5/2/12010 2014 PM Peat Hour Measures a /Effeetl -nass K:\01688-430\Trafflc\2014MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 626/2013 m�a ®��e�s�nasms�s�m ® ® ®eeemee mssssnss■s�sesss■ss■s� 2: 651h Street & Bank DW mnnnnnnnnneesn�mnnnnnnsmss, mss■ss■s��ssssss■ss■ss■ mns�ns�n ®ewe ©es ®�'mnnnnnnsmss, mmt��ssss�ss■sivsn mee ©men® ©tee ©sas�s�nes�nnnsmss mes ®snss■ssssi ®® s�nnennnnnmm���ms� ®nnnns ®ss ,mas ®sssss�ss■ss■ss■ mnnnnnnnnnene�ms�nnnnnsmss, s�ss•snse■ss■sns�ss■sss mmom�mnm ®men ©�s�on�nnesmss mmm�����e mnsmnsmnsmnsmnenn��n�noonsmss, m ®mtm�e�n.� meees ®een ®eevssas�,�s�e ®flees ®ss s�sss�ss■ss■s�s ®snsn m ©s�B� ® ®n�emn ®s��mn�aeeesmss, mas ® ®���_� �nnnnennennn��;mneeenemte m���®���� mn�n�n� ®nmm�ntntmn��ennmto m ®ss■ss■ss■ss■ssae•s� mnnnnnn ®nnena�m ®ns�nnnsmss ms ®snsnss■smss■snsn enn ®�nsmnsenm ® ®ntms�nnnnnsmsm mamtmt��s ®�sn mnenn�nnnnm�e�;�en�nnnml� s�snsnsnsmssss■s�s mn ®nn ©seen ®n ®nses�,� ®�nnnnsmss, s�snons ®sososs■s�ss■ maaoononnnon�m!monnnnnmto !ms ®����ss■�� mnm® ®ems © ®nm ®mmmn��nnnsmss m ®��sss.sass■ss■� I=�m ©n ®n ®n © ® ®eo�mm ®e ®onnsmss m ©m��o��v mnsmesmnsmosme ®� ®smm� ®en�ss ®� �s ®sm�s�s0ss■ss� Mnnnnnnnnnnnem,mnnnnnnM" MnMnMnM=Mnmn==MnMnnnn=M m®MMmtMMMM mm�e�e�m�n ® ® ®sssm��nn ®ems® mm®mtm MMMM ms�ns sus m�s�nn ®�snm��nnnns�sm M = =MM®®MM msmmsmmsmmsm�menmmm�s��eenss�sss. s�� ®������ K:\01688-430\Trafflc\2014MOEs TAB: [PM MOEs] 626/2013 sm,TOmo a0euteaen summery 61243013 2030 AM Peak Hour Measures of EHO.M...ss KA01686- 430 \TrafBc\2030 MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] � I -AYMP &I !mnmemmm�mn ®n ®mmmm�eenn.e mmmmammmm m ©mm® ©mama ®emt�m ®mmeeem•e m�������� mmnmmmnmm ®ne ®�mnmm�nnn.e m ®n������ m ©mmmm ®nmo�emtm,mmmmeeem.e mmm�an��� mmnnmmeemmeeent mmnmeee�e��,mmmmmmmmm .. me ®nme ®nmenne�e ®mneee�e e�e ®���� - �menenennenenent,mmnmeee � ©e����� mnnm ©nmm ®n ©nente ® ®mee Ron a ©ee� ©��� mmmm ©nmm ®ne ®�'� ®n ©eeen■e mmmmmmmmm mm ®emmmem ® ®e�nt�mmmeeen.e mm ®mmmmmm �mmmmmmmm ,meneneennneee�lmnnneeem.e m ©mom © ®mm�mnmm',mmmnnnnm•o ommmmmmmm mnnonnnnnnonommnon000m . o mmmmmmmmm mnm ©mnm ©mn�nmtmmemmooem.e mmmm ©emmm mnno ©nnennnnnmmnnenno�o m ©mmmmmmm mmm�mn ®n ®non ®miomm�nenm.o��mmmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnm . o mmmmmmmmm mmmnmmmnmnmn ®mmn ®nnnn ®n mmmmm ®mmm ' memmmmmmmnnm�mmm��nnn�o �mn (mmmm ®mmmmmm mmm ®mem ®mnammmm��mnnn�n mmmmnmmmm ®nm ® ®� ©��m�� ®nnn ®e ®mmmm ,mmmmmm memmmmmmenn® ®mmmm ®onnnse mn ®m ®mmmm KA01686- 430 \TrafBc\2030 MOEs TAB: [AM MOEs] � I -AYMP &I SlmTnM, Simulatlon Summary 612612011 1010 PM Peak Hour Measures ar Effectiveness IOD1688- 430\Traffic12030 MOEs TAB: [PM MOEsj 626/2013 M I 1: Stilt, street a Valley Vie. Rd 4: 65th Street S, Cendo Gwag. m��® ®ems ®tee ®seem ®��eee�e me�����a� I� ��nnn�eneeeee� meeee�e�� �o��v���� ;o ®mom ©mo�000�m�m ®�0000�o mom ®����� �000�onoon000mm000000�o m����so�� �nnnnnn�nnonem;meen000�e m ®��o��s� IOD1688- 430\Traffic12030 MOEs TAB: [PM MOEsj 626/2013 M I 6500 France Avenue Traffic Study City of Edina April 6, 2012 Page 7 of 7 4 Vehicle Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis for both the existing and future 2014 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at existing driveways and intersections on 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the AM and PM peak hours, for the existing and future 2014 conditions, the average queues in the corridor do not exceed any of the available turn lanes storage. In some cases however, the maximum queues were exceeded. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In most cases the queues exceed the storage in the continuous left turn lane, therefore only blocking the adjacent driveway and not impacting through traffic. Based on the analysis none of the anticipated average queues or maximum queues on 65th Street will back up or block either the France Ave or the Site Access intersections. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed site redevelopment is proposed to include primarily medical office and supporting uses and is anticipated to generate 2280 trips in a day, 279 trips in the AM peak hour and 216 trips in the PM peak hour. • Traffic operations at the intersections and driveway on 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road will remain the same with or without the proposed redevelopment. • Traffic operations at the proposed site driveway will operate at overall LOS A in the AM and PM peak hours with the worst movement operating at a LOS C. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact to the adjacent driveways or intersections will occur as a result of the proposed redevelopment. Based on these conclusions no additional improvements other than those shown on the site plan would be required to accommodate the proposed site redevelopment. I Jackie Hooaenakker I live at #603 at Point of France. Our condo'overlooks the project. I support the development and feel it will bean asset to the area. I just received your recent mailing with the latest architect drawing. If my recollection is correct, the exterior originally looked more like the Twin Cities Orthopedics wit rich looking shades of brown. This current Aurora on France building seems to show a cheap yellow look as shown in the latest drawing. I hope it is ONLY the printer shade" and not reality. That Red 8 on front of the building seems to cheapen the.exterior look. I note that those huge beautiful flowerpot containers originally included on the corner are now missing and replaced with rather pathetic looking low planters. Unfortunately, I no longer have the previous drawings of the building, but seems there was also beautiful area (perhaps on the green roof) toward the POF side.I hope it.is still there. Last year, Point of France owners were told that they would be invited to use Aurora's dining facilities, be invited movies that would be show_ n in their movie theater (with a ceiling of twinkling lights to remind folk of Drive In movies) etc That is one reason why I strongly supported the project. I hope this offer has not been eliminated due to any change in concept. Thank you all for your work on this and other Edina issues. Sincerely, Penny Smith 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Tree <twedin @ncscor.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 201410:19 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Aurora project Hi The project is very nice looking and the skyway to the ramp is nice. From the previous Aurora presentations they were touting many amenities that there would be at this facility and with this basic outline it doesn't give enough detail to determine exactly but in practical terms only parking for 30 employees seems short. If there are more than 30 staff or vendors there where will they park? Jones Harris in Minneapolis and the addition to the Coop at 7600 Xerxes both have parking issues for staff with overflow parking all over have you ever driven it buy these places? Are they going to park in the lot across from valley view at the park? The streets surrounding the development are no parking, 65th France, valley view, what is the plan? Will they be allowed to use the Fairview ramp? I guess my concern is our parking lots ...... will we have to add staff for a parking guard on our two lots? Our receiving lot could be full or empty on any given day and I just see it as a natural progression for the Aurora folks to use our lots without some kind of a plan. How do I see the rest of the plans noted on the drawing index? Thanks! Tere ,a/W edf vv NCS Sa&k twedi4 u nc,sco . com 7440 W 78d vStreetl 3 MN 55439 952 - 941 -4464 / 866 -404 -2060 J 952 - 941 -0396 fax, Jackie Hoogenakker Ororn: Judie Mattison <judiematt @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 7:17 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 6500 France Av S I am a resident of Point of France, 6566 France Av. S. I write to support construction of a senior care building at 6500 France Av. S. which is being considered for final rezoning. This building can be a valuable asset to our neighborhood as it. serves the growing number of aging people in our community. The neighborhood has other medical services into which these services would fit and with whom they can possibly cooperate. I encourage you to approve this beneficial addition to our area. Judith Mattison Point of France #908 o e v � - �y • I�C�RPoR"N, O • 1886 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. A. From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Action Discussion Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -153 Sidewalk Facilities Map Amendment Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -153, approving the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the following: ➢ Revise and replace the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Transportation Chapter (Chapter 7) of the Comprehensive Plan and Figure 7 -10 Sidewalk Facilities. Information / Background: As part of the overall Living Streets Plan, staff has been preparing a new Sidewalk Facilities Map based in part on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets policy and input from City staff, officials and residents. At the Jul. I Work Session, City Council expressed a desire to approve an updated Sidewalk Facilities Map prior to the approval of the overall Living Streets Plan (anticipated for early of 2015). City Council also directed staff to bring the Sidewalk Facilities Map forward for amendment into the Comprehensive Plan, so that an approved sidewalk network can be considered during the planning and design of current and future roadway reconstruction projects. Please recall that staff presented the Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment to City Council for approval at its Nov. 3 meeting. Prior to the presentation and public hearing, Council motioned to delay the vote on the amendment to the Dec. 2 meeting. The public hearing was closed on Nov. 3. The following is the revised timeline for the proposed amendment to the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan: • Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) Oct. 3 • Informational packet received by City Council Oct. 7 • Planning Commission Public Hearing and Approval of Amendment Oct. 22 • Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) Oct. 27 • City Council Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan amendment Nov. 3 • Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication Nov. 24 • City Council Action on Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dec. 2 The Sidewalk Facilities Map shows the streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidewalks are planned over the next 20 -30 years. It should be noted that the map does not indicate on which side of the City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 street future sidewalks are to be installed. This decision will be based on input from more thorough engineering studies and stakeholders prior to design and installation. Additionally, if a sidewalk is not indicated on a particular street, this does not preclude that street from being considered for a sidewalk in the future as its context criteria (e.g. traffic counts, speeds, redevelopment, etc.) may change overtime, and residents are free to petition for a sidewalk as well. The Sidewalk Facilities Map reflects thoughtful and considerable construction of criteria, is data- driven (see attached matrix), and most importantly is consistent with the Living Streets Policy vision and value of supporting the transportation needs of all Edina's residents. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Pedestrian Facilities Attached is the Sidewalk Facilities Map, which will replace Figure 7.10 in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Also attached is Resolution 2014 -153, which contains the content that is meant to replace the "Pedestrian Facilities" section of that Plan (Chapter 7, pages 7 -33 to 7 -36: "Pedestrian and Bike Facilities "). Please note that minor modifications have been made to both the Map and text (see attached Resolution) since the Nov. 3 public hearing. Summary of Public Input The following is a summary of public input and correspondence received since the Nov. 3 public hearing regarding the proposed amendment, as of Nov. 24. Correspondence received after this date will be given to Council at the Dec. 2 meeting. Also, the Speak Up, Edina! discussion will remain open until Nov. 30 and can be accessed here: http : / /sReakupedina.org/discussions /sidewalk - facilities -map Speak Up. Edina Discussion A public discussion regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment was opened on Speak Up, Edina! on Oct. 3, and with the exception of approximately ten days (before the Nov.3 public hearing) will run continuously until Nov. 30. The Report/Recommendation to Council regarding the proposed amendment as well as the Sidewalk Facilities Map itself were posted for viewing/download. As of Nov. 24, 91 comments have been submitted by the public (98 overall) have been submitted, with over 95% expressing support for the Sidewalk Facilities Map, and /or sidewalks in general. These include residents supporting and /or requesting sidewalks on their own streets, in addition to general support. Resident Email Correspondence Attached are the emails received regarding the proposed amendment, along with staff responses, since the Nov. 3 public hearing (as of Nov. 24). Staff has received over 50 emails from members of the public during that time, ranging from comments on sidewalks in general, to those regarding the need for (or opposition of) sidewalks in specific locations. Staff estimates that approximately 70% of these emails express support for the Sidewalk Facilities Map and /or sidewalks in general. If "neutral" responses are included, that number rises to over 80% (under 20% in opposition). Quadrant Input Meetings Below are brief summaries of the four meetings held (one for each quadrant of the City) this week to share information and obtain feedback regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Attached are more detailed notes regarding individual verbal questions and comments received during the meetings, along with written comments submitted. Attendees at each of the four meetings expressed differing levels of support and opposition for the Sidewalk Facilities Map and for sidewalks on specific streets. When taken as a whole, staff felt that there was more support than opposition for the Sidewalk Facilities Map at the meetings. However, there were some residents who were very clear in their opposition to sidewalks on the streets where they live, with some of those still expressing general support for sidewalks in Edina. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center Approximately 50 people attended the Northwest Quadrant meeting, and 35 comment sheets were received. Elected /appointed officials included Mayor Hovland, who arrived at 7:30 as the formal portion of the meeting was ending. The Mayor stayed until the last attendee left, which was just after 8:00. Staff gave a'presentation, which started just after 6:00. The presentation was meant to be brief, however, many questions were asked and discussions held during the presentation. As a result, the presentation concluded after 7:00. Most in attendance (approximately 80 -90 %) were opposed to the Sidewalk Facilities Map and /or sidewalks being installed on their streets. The majority of those in opposition live in the Highlands Neighborhood. A minority of attendees (five or six) did voice their support for the Map and what the City is attempting to accomplish. Significant themes from the Northwest Quadrant meeting were: • Many felt that a citywide survey /questionnaire should have gone out to all households in the City, asking about their preferences for sidewalks. • Resident responsibility (and burden) for snow removal was a major theme (especially for the elderly) • Some expressed doubt that the data used for some of the criteria was appropriate (e.g. vehicle counts and speeds) and thought sidewalks should go only where pedestrians currently are. • Some thought that traffic calming and enforcement should be increased to increase the safety of pedestrians on the roadway, instead of constructing sidewalks. • A few vocal attendees expressed disappointment that City Council seemed to be "cramming" this in against the wishes of residents, or at the very least without their input • There was doubt among some that the PACS Fund covers all of the costs, and that sidewalk installation will have no effect on their (rising) property taxes. • Several attendees expressed that they have nothing against sidewalks, just in this location. Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works The Southwest Quadrant meeting was attended by nearly 20 people (eight comment sheets were received), including Councilmember Mary Brindle and ETC Chair Katherine Bass. At the conclusion of a brief presentation a group discussion was held with all of the attendees. Most in attendance were supportive of the Sidewalk Facilities Map. There were some in attendance who spoke against the overall plan and expressed concerns regarding some of the details of the plan. Significant themes from the Southwest Quadrant meeting were: • There was a sentiment that southwest Edina does not have a enough sidewalks when compared to the other quadrants of the city and that additional routes should be added. • Some felt that there needs to be an implementation schedule developed for the sidewalks, and the segment of Valley View Rd from Mark Terrace to Gleason Rd needs to be added as soon as possible. • Lighting needs to be examined with each of the sidewalks projects to ensure pedestrian safety. • Since the City is initiating the sidewalk map update, it should also conduct the snow removal on all walks, not just State Aid and school /park routes. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall Page 4 The Northeast Quadrant meeting was attended by 20 people. The attendees included ETC Member Jennifer Janovy. Questions were answered during the presentation, which concluded at approximately 6:45. A question and answer session was then held, with limited dialogue between the attendees. It is estimated that support for the Sidewalk Facilities Map was approximately 50% upon arrival; however, support seemed to increase as the meeting progressed. The last of the attendees departed at approximately 8:15 and left 13 comment sheets. The most significant themes from the Northeast Quadrant meeting were: • There was concern about the impact of narrowing the street and the effect on commercial vehicle traffic and snow. • It was mentioned that other existing sidewalks such those on France Ave just north of Hwy 62 are in rough shape and that existing facilities should be maintained before building any additional sidewalks. • There was concern by some related to sidewalk snow removal and the need for clear communication about the responsibilities of homeowners. • Attendees seemed to grasp how the impact of street reconstruction with narrow streets and sidewalks was minor on existing boulevards. • There was much concern over the upcoming project to construct sidewalk in Arden Park (on the west side of Minnehaha Blvd) and potential removal of mature trees. • Attendees again mentioned the need to know the implementation schedule. Southeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works Nearly 40 residents attended the Southeast Quadrant meeting, and submitted 18 comment sheets. Overall, support and opposition seemed relatively balanced, with the vast majority of opposition coming from residents who live on West Shore Drive (primary south of W. 70th St). After the initial 20- minute presentation concluded, questions were asked and answered for a period of approximately one hour, at which time some residents left and others stayed to continue discussion. ETC members Emily Boettge and Larry Olson were in attendance, and were joined by Mayor Hovland and Councilmember Elect Kevin Staunton later in the meeting. Significant themes from the Southeast Quadrant meeting were: • Many residents of West Shore Drive were opposed to a sidewalk on their street. They cited past surveys and the removal of the sidewalk from the reconstruction project in 2009. • Residents potentially having to maintain (especially plow snow from) sidewalks was a significant issue. Relatedly, there was concern that if Public Works has to maintain all sidewalks, then property taxes would increase to pay for this. • Some attendees questioned the need for a boulevard, and wanted any sidewalks to be constructed at the back of curb. • Some expressed a desire for more east -west sidewalk routes in the Lake and South Cornelia neighborhoods. • Some felt that individual surveys should be sent to every household to clearly ask their opinions about sidewalks, and how their survey answers would affect City policy. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Attachments: • Resolution No. 2014 -153 • Sidewalk Facilities Map: Figure 7.10 • Sidewalk Criteria Matrix • ETC Advisory Communication: Sidewalk Facilities Map • ETC Draft Nov. 20 Minutes • Resident comments via Speak Up! Edina • Resident email correspondence received since the Nov. 3 public hearing • Presentation given at four Quadrant Input Meetings • Summary of verbal comments /questions received at four Quadrant Input Meetings • Sign -In Sheets and Written Comment Sheets from four Quadrant Input Meetings • Correspondence received via Mail Page 5 G: \PW\CENTRAL SVGS \TRANSPORTATION DIV\Non- Motorized Transportation \Sidewalk Facilities Map \Item VIII.A. Sidewalk Facilities Map Comp Plan Amendment.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2014-153 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO REVISE AND REPLACE THE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SECTION OF TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 7 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Comprehensive Plan states that "sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for all individuals of all-ages, decreased the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles." The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that in order for the City's sidewalk system to be effective, it should provide network continuity with broad geographic coverage and without notable gaps. 1.02 In the City's 2013 Quality of Life Survey, 41 percent of respondents indicated that Edina has too few sidewalks, and 73 percent of those who believe Edina needs to improve its walkability indicated that more sidewalks would do so. 1.03 In December of 2012, the City created the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund, which is a dedicated source of funding for the construction and maintenance of non - motorized transportation infrastructure. Property owners are no longer assessed for new sidewalks. 1.04 In August of 2013, the City Council unanimously approved the Living Streets Policy, which includes the following principle: "The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes." 1.05 As part of the overall Living Streets Plan, staff has been preparing a new Sidewalk Facilities Map based in part on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets policy and input from City staff, officials and residents. 1.06 At their July 1 Work Session, City Council expressed a desire to approve an updated Sidewalk Facilities Map prior to the approval of the overall Living Streets Plan (anticipated by early of 2015). Council also directed staff to bring the Sidewalk Facilities Map forward for amendment into the Comprehensive Plan , so that an approved sidewalk network can be considered during the planning and design of current and future roadway reconstruction projects. 1.07 On October 22, 2014 a public hearing was held with the Planning Commission regarding amending the Sidewalk Facilities Map to the Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting testimony was heard and the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 1.08 The following is the timeline for approvals and amendment to the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan: ,RESOLUTION NO. 2,0147153 Page 2 o Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) October 3 C Informational packet received by Council - October 7 C Planning Commission, Public Hearing and Approval of 'Amendment October 22 o City Council Public Hearing Regarding Comprehensive Plan amendment November 3 C City Council Vote Regarding Comprehensive Plan Amendment - December 2 1.09 The proposed amendment indicates the Edina streets that currently have sidewalks along with those streets where sidewalks are planned in the next 20 to 30 years. The following should be noted: • The Plan is not meant to indicate on which side of the street future sidewalks are to be installed; that decision will be based on input from more thorough - engineering studies and stakeholders prior to design and installation • If a sidewalk is not indicated on a particular street,: this does not preclude that street from being considered for a sidewalk in the future as its context criteria (e.g. traffic counts, speeds, redevelopment) may change over time, and residents are free to petition for a sidewalk as well. G Future sidewalk design (e.g. location, boulevard width) can vary depending on impacts such as existing trees, steep slopes, etc. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Goals of the Comprehensive.Plan include safe walking, bicycling and driving, and promoting health; the proposed amendmentmould assist the City in meeting these goals by planning for a citywide pedestrian transportation network based on adopted policy and data: 2. The City's Living Streets Policy states that sidewalks,are required on all arterial and collector streets, and where streets abut a public:school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park; the proposed amendment meets these goals. 3. The proposed amendment reflects thoughtful and considerable construction of criteria, is data- driven, and is consistent with the Living Streets Policy vision and value of supporting the transportation needs of all Edina's residents. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-153 Page 3 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Pedestrian Facilities The goal of this section is to build upon the current City practices to create a framework for planning and implementation of future sidewalks. Sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities are an important component of the City's transportation infrastructure. Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages and abilities, decrease the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. An effective municipal sidewalk system provides network continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users and uses, without notable gaps. * Park and activity eenter walking zone Retail business ivaAdng zones Reads where highve-hdrFle volumes create an impediment to pedestfian ,.ts nvvczmicrrca r_ r Y. ■ RESOLUTION NO. 2014-153 Page 4 Leeal/ Low Volume Street Zone sidewa4ks are any sideivalks that do not meet any of the above defipAfiens, but have impe-Affi4ce fire-0; aec-ess and system eentinuity per-spec-tives. Special r r t y assessment policy should be reviewed F each individual project. The City has the discretion to er-der a p��eet assessed on a per aE�aeent lot basis, per local area assessment- 01! a c-on+binatien of both. Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical connections between multiple modes of travel, as users of motor vehicles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip. Refer to the Sidewalk Facilities Map (Figure 7.10) for locations of existing and future sidewalks. Sidewalks are required: • Where a street abuts or is in the vicinity of a public school, public building, community playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context. • On both sides of minor arterial streets. • On one or both sides of collector streets. • As required by zoning code or condition of plan approval. • When one or more of the context criteria are met (see below)., The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional sidewalk should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering judgment. An optional sidewalk may be required when: ow, ■ 1 E M.WWO H Z MST - ■. ORM. WIN MOM Special r r t y assessment policy should be reviewed F each individual project. The City has the discretion to er-der a p��eet assessed on a per aE�aeent lot basis, per local area assessment- 01! a c-on+binatien of both. Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical connections between multiple modes of travel, as users of motor vehicles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip. Refer to the Sidewalk Facilities Map (Figure 7.10) for locations of existing and future sidewalks. Sidewalks are required: • Where a street abuts or is in the vicinity of a public school, public building, community playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context. • On both sides of minor arterial streets. • On one or both sides of collector streets. • As required by zoning code or condition of plan approval. • When one or more of the context criteria are met (see below)., The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional sidewalk should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering judgment. An optional sidewalk may be required when: ow, ■ 1 E M.WWO H Z MST - Special r r t y assessment policy should be reviewed F each individual project. The City has the discretion to er-der a p��eet assessed on a per aE�aeent lot basis, per local area assessment- 01! a c-on+binatien of both. Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical connections between multiple modes of travel, as users of motor vehicles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip. Refer to the Sidewalk Facilities Map (Figure 7.10) for locations of existing and future sidewalks. Sidewalks are required: • Where a street abuts or is in the vicinity of a public school, public building, community playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context. • On both sides of minor arterial streets. • On one or both sides of collector streets. • As required by zoning code or condition of plan approval. • When one or more of the context criteria are met (see below)., The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional sidewalk should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering judgment. An optional sidewalk may be required when: RESOLUTION NO. 2014-153 Page 5 • A sidewalk is recommended by the Edina Active (Safe) Routes to School Comprehensive Plan., • The street is located at an identified park or commercial destination. • Average daily traffic is greater than 500 vehicles: • 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 mph. • There is a history of crashes_ involving pedestrians walking along the roadway. • Transit stop(s) are present. • A sidewalk would create a logical connection between destinations. • Site lines, roadway geometry, or insufficient lighting makes it difficult for motorists to see pedestrians walking along the roadway! • The street width is less than 27 feet: Citizen- and /or business - petitioned sidewalk locations will also receive important consideration as they are brought forward for City review. Sidewalks witlwl the City are divided into the following three categories. It is possible that a sidewalk nay fit into more than one category; State-Aid sidewalks are located adjacent to Municipal State -Aid Streets (MSAS) Active Routes to School sidewalks are identified by the Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan (approved on Feb 3, 2014) as recommended to improve connectivity and safe routes to schools. City sidewalks are sidewalks that meet the requirements and /or context criteria above. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide to provide adequate space for two pedestrians to, comfortably pass side -by -side. Wider sidewalks (8 to 12 feet) are recommended where pedestrians are likely to travel in groups, such as near schools and in shopping districts, or where adjacent to transit stops A standard 5 -foot boulevard (the space between the sidewalk and the curb or edge of pavement) shall i be provided whenever possible to increase pedestrian safety and comfort, as well as providing space for snow storage. In shopping districts characterized by zero -lot lines, street furniture and /or on- street parking, sidewalks may be wider with no boulevard. Additionally, a shallower boulevard or curbside sidewalk may be constructed when the cost of constructing a five -foot boulevard would be excessively disproportionate due to existing right -of -way or topographical constraints. Curbside sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 6 feet unobstructed for travel (5 feet clear of sign posts, traffic signals, utility poles, etc., plus one foot for snow storage/ clearing operations) ,Financing of the future sidewalks are separated into two categories: 1. State -Aid Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State -Aid designated roadway and are paid by a combination of State -Aid funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund..!, 2. Active Routes to School and City Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a non - State -Aid designated roadway and are paid 100 percent by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund: RESOLUTION NO. 2014-153 Page 6 Sidewalks that are required as a condition of developer approval would be funded by the developer. The City should search out additional funding sources, such as grants or partnering with other agencies, for larger projects that have regional significance. One potential important source is the Safe Routes to School Program in which Mn /DOT allocates federal funds to projects of merit selected on a competitive basis. Sidewalks located on State -Aid roads or within the Public School Zones will be maintained by the City of Edina. Typical City maintenance includes snow removal and repair of broken or shifted sidewalks. Sidewalks located on Leeal/ Loiv Volume Street `'ones and Destination Zones must be M—ai—ntai—ned by the proper-ty. owners. in other areas must be maintained by the property owners. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ' day of , 2014. City Clerk Edina Sidewalk Facilities Map Criteria Matrix Streets listed below are local streets as defined in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan (according to the Sidewalk Facilities Plan, sidewalks are required on Minor Arterial and Collector Streets) Quadrant Street Name(s) Average Daily Traffic (vehicles) 85th% Speed (mph) Additional Comments Northeast Arden Ave S / Minnehaha Blvd 500 Connects /adjacent to Arden Park Northeast Beard Ave S 400 Connects /adjacent to Strachauer Park Northeast Concord Ave 1,300 Connects to Southview Middle School, Kuhlman Field Northeast Halifax Ave S 1,200 33 Northeast Grimes Ave S 850 32 Connects to Weber Park, 2 private schools Northeast W 48th St 1,000 Northeast W 49th St 424 31 Adjacent to commercial district Northeast W 52nd St 475 Connects to Arden Park, trail Northeast W 55th St Connects to York Park Northeast W 58th St 1,000 -3,300 33 Connects three collector streets to Pamela Park Northeast W 59th St 575 31 Connects to Concord School Northeast W 60th St 1,100 Connects to Pamela Park, St. Johns Park Northwest Arbor Ave 310 30 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Northwest Ayrshire Blvd 890 33 Connects Highlands Park and School Northwest Benton Ave 931 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Northwest Division St / Cooper Ave 1,000 34 Connects two collector streets to Todd Park Northwest Doncaster Way 425 32 1 Connects /adjacent to Highlands Park Northwest Glengarry Pkwy Adjacent to Highlands Park Northwest Hansen Rd 1,700 32 Connects to Birchcrest Park Northwest Interlachen Blvd / Park Terrace/ Malibu Dr 1,100 -2,200 Connects toTH 169 & Van Valkenberg Park Northwest Lincoln Or / Dovre Or / Londonberry Rd / Stauder Cir 1,750 32 Northwest Malibu Or / Telemark Tr / Parkwood Rd / Parkwood Ln 1,500 34 Connects to TH 169 & Van Valkenberg Park Northwest Mirror Lakes Dr 730 32 Connects to Highlands Park Northwest Olinger Rd 1,900 37 Connects to Bredesen Park Northwest Schaefer Rd 600 35 Northwest Sun Rd 3,070 31 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Northwest Valley View Rd / Maddox Ln / Normandale Rd 1,500 -2,600 38 Connects to bridges across TH 100 & TH 62 Northwest I W 60th St 4,000 36 Northwest Wyman Ave 1,500 1 Pedestrian access across TH 62 Southeast Barrie Rd / Heritage Or 1,350 -3,650 32 Southeast Claremore Dr lActive Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast Cornelia Dr 2,000 35 1 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast Kellogg Ave Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast Normandale Rd 1,200 35 Southeast Oaklawn Ave 1,800 35 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast W 64th St Connection to beacon crossing of Xerxes Ave Southeast W 65th St Connection to hospital /medical area Southeast West Shore Dr 1,300 32 Active Routes to School- recommended sidewalk Southeast Wooddale Ave 5 1,000 Southwest Amundson Ave Adjacent to retail /business area Southwest Braemar Blvd 1,000 32 Connects to Braemar Golf Course, Golf Dome, Arena Southwest Bush Lake Rd 4,500 34 Southwest Dewey Hill Rd / W 74th St 3,400 Connects to Lewis Park Southwest Indian Hills Pass 1,300 34 Connects to Creek Valley Elementary Southwest Nordic Cir Adjacent to Creek Valley School Southwest Ridgeview Rd / Abercrombie Dr / Raburn Dr 460 30 Southwest Tracy Ave / W 66th St 1,500 33 Southwest W 63rd St / Ridgeview Or 2,700 34 Southwest Ohms Ln 2,700 32 Southwest Warren Ave 500 33 Connects /adjacent to Normandale Park 0 I ¢ _.. y Mud Lake e.. 17 LYeck Vall cv Cam(' rR Scltrol j Lake Edina High i School Valley IbnI,CEY view a� Mid& It lanhea ---- +q���ii,�„ 0 l °`e 1 Nsrt Milo: Csm� ._ p(Shin C] C1Hi9i an Schml ' Gol &n Years i Morscsmr C�A )11 W a; SOT H Sr W 1% Wands » tb e -City Ptbl'c t All.11ipnr. I \ , { l Il o , 'or I, m drool CL l'I 54TH Sr W + �StPaters I� HigNatd \ a Lut ran cto r' g � School n ;1..» D Nor�nan¢IIc ' l` Ih�ic�• � ffi 4fl 1 Fdim 7 r �i6T Sr Commrmin• Cc rter I C- N,side cp °.I i School - school ...... i ! i Like � w• r ��•RU Pamel 1 Fire LR• =V —_ g 'T Ji DEWEY H� I` RD 4•_ U I - I Lake ....,... -�.� 66TH Sr W ' I � Cornelia � •'� H s a � W x 1, 7 Tll SfW t 1 School o Fire ,Sl9l�R. — { Lake I Edina Public Works & Park Maim lice ••• •• ... �\ v .• m.� TRT H ST W Il r.r.•r . I m pnuncsoTn on Legend Existing - Future - Future e ... Future Sidewalk State -Aid Sidewalk Active Routes City Sidewalk To School Sidewalk �gtNA..I'L oJ�e �y City of Edina ..���. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Sidewalk Facilities Future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail N W +E S Engineering Dept November 2014 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Edina Transportation Commission Date: December 2, 2014 'k O Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Sidewalk Facilities Map Attachments: None Action Requested: The ETC recommends that the City Council approve the Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment ( "Sidewalk Facilities Map ") at the December 2, 2014 City Council Meeting. The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a necessary and essential step toward achieving the purpose of the Living Streets Policy to "balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health." Situation: At the November 3, 2014 City Council Meeting, Council members deferred the vote on the Sidewalk Facilities Map until December 2, 2014. The vote was deferred to give residents a further opportunity to provide input on the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map. Specifically, in addition to the public hearing held on November 3, public meetings were scheduled in each quadrant of Edina. The purpose of the Quadrant Meetings was to give residents an opportunity to voice their opinions, vet ideas, and ask questions thoroughly, in face -to -face conversations with city staff and public officials. Comments were also solicited via email and on Speak -Up Edina for those residents unable to attend a Quadrant Meeting. Assessment: At the Quadrant Meetings, residents heard an informational presentation by city staff, had the opportunity to complete a written questionnaire, ask questions, offer their input, and meet with public officials. Mayor Hovland, City Councilmember Mary Brindle, City Councilmember -elect Kevin Staunton, and ETC members Katherine Bass, Emily Boettge, Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson and Larry Olson attended the Quadrant Meetings. A summary of residents' comments and questions has been provided to you. Snow removal, in particular, was a topic of interest for residents. We understand city staff is conducting further research into the possibility of public works assuming the responsibility of snow removal for the sidewalk network. Maintenance can be paid for out of the PACS fund. Page 2 Background: Uj t� O .� taett • In December of 2012, the City created the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund, which eliminated special assessments to homeowners in lieu of a community-wide fund intended "exclusively for specific improvements to the city's non - motorized transportation network," such as sidewalks, trails, and bicycle facilities. • In August of 2013, the City Council unanimously approved the Living Streets Policy, which states that, "the City will plan, and build quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, elderly, and disabled) -while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes." Furthermore, the approved Living Streets Policy states that the city will develop and adopt guidelines for sidewalks and that these guidelines "will provide well- designed pedestrian accommodation" on arterials, collectors, local connectors and where the street abuts a public school, public building, community play field, or neighborhood park. • In June of 2014, the City Council unanimously approved the Active Routes to School Plan. The purpose of this Plan "is to document the existing walking and biking environment in Edina, identify opportunities and priorities to increase walking and biking to schools, and develop an implementation plan for making the improvements." • In October of 2014, Future IQ Partners identified eleven cohort cities as part of the Edina, Community Profile and Benchmark Analysis. It bears noting that eight of the eleven cities have bicycle and pedestrian plans that demonstrate the high value these communities have placed on bicycle and pedestrian safety and mobility. (Bellevuewa.gov, indympo.org, citypil.com, cityofls.net, littletongov.org, ci. man hattan-beach.ca.us, menlopark.org, newtonma.org) Recommendation: The ETC strongly recommends that the Sidewalk Facilities Map be approved at the December 2, 2014 City Council Meeting. We believe the Sidewalk Facilities Map faithfully carries out the important policies the City Council embraced when it unanimously approved the Living Streets Policy and the Active Routes to School Plan. The Sidewalk Facilities Map has been prepared with tremendous thought toward making Edina a more connected community through the implementation of a non- motorized network that will help achieve the vision of a future with a safe, accessible multi -modal transportation system. Each sidewalk proposed on the map has been assessed according to the context criteria. Therefore, the ETC recommends that the Sidewalk Map be approved in its entirety as a holistic network to benefit the community at large. The Sidewalk Map is a plan that will be implemented over the next 20 -30 years and as such, the ETC A` 1r Page 3 ty Htt recommends that sidewalks not be removed from the plan unless data can show that the context criteria, regarding a particular sidewalk, have not been met. Removing sidewalks piece by piece has the potential to compromise the entire network and thus, the ETC recommends that the Sidewalk Facilities Map be approved, in whole, as presented. Prepared by: Commissioner Emily Boettge Reviewed by: Commissioners Paul Nelson and Larry Olson Date: November 24, 2014 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM\Advisory Communications\2010tem Ix. C. ETC Advisory Communication—Bicycling in Municipal Lots.docx MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM NOVEMBER 20, 2014 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Olson, Rummel, Spanhake and Whited. ABSENT Member lyer. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment '' , Planner Nolan said on Nov. 3, the City Council tabled a motion to vote, on the Sidewalk Facilities Map and closed the public hearing. He said at least one councilmember requested an advisory communication from the ETC. He updated the ETC on the four meetings that were held to gather feedback from residents. He said majorityin the northwest quadrant were not in favor of sidewalks, while the others were more favorable,<He,saiid those on Speak Up EdinaI are overwhelmingly in favor and of the emails received recently, at least 80% are in favor. The ETC discussed concerns raised at the meetings by residents and ackhowledged the validity of some concerns namely shoveling snow might be difficult for some elderly,"residents; however, they felt it was still important to move forward with the Ian. The brainstormed key v..,,.;,,, p y y points to emphasize in the advisory communication and some suggestions were: • Importance of building out the network • Conservative plan (sidewalk not on every street) • Connects to destination • Plan is data driven (volume /speed) • Cost estimate for public wgrks to do maintenance • Education ' • Plan is consistent with policy already adoptedlby City Council • Accept�map in its entirety,;,`,'. Regarding the 2015 Birchcrest Neighborhood Reconstruction and the sidewalk that City Council did not approve in 2014 for this neighborhood, member Nelson said this sidewa1k,is on the Sidewalk Facilities Map and he believes it should be constructed in 2015. He said it is not constructed the road should at least be narrowed to accommodate the sidewalk at a future date. Member LaForce:agreed. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member La Force to write an advisory communication to the City Council that is in strong support of th'e S! idewalk Facilities Map and to adopt it as presented. All voted aye. Motion carried. Member Boettge will write the advisory communication and members Olson, Janovy and Nelson will review. 1 City of Edina City of Edina • Home EDiscussions • Forums Sigh Wpas • Meetings • Surveys Email email Passwo password... - or, Sign In— . profile Connect - Sign In • Help Like c° Sign Out I Tweet Share Page 1 of 3 .:+��k, .'' we re always looking for feedi;ack,and ideas for how,we can make Edina 'an'- • even better piace for living; leamIin raising families anddoing business. Take a moment to provide.your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's .your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SAARF your feedback! ► POST your ide. as[ P. JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Sidewalk Facilities Map The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidewalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new map will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. There are four public meetings scheduled to gather input based on the City's four quadrants: • Northwest Edina— 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina— 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. • Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard We want to know what you think about the Sidewalk Plan. View the staff memo to the City Council. View the revised Sidewalk Facilities Map. 2 Topics 98 Answers I I Closes 2014 -11 -30 Topics 0 • Edit • Delete Topic: Future Sidewalks View the map of the proposed sidewalk plan. Do you have any additional suggestions on where future sidewalks should go? If so, where? 88 Responses View Topic 0 • Edit • Delete I -- II----- I---- - .3 = - -- - .._1.1:- --- ..:- __i_:a --- ...11. 4r -- _,..,._ I i MAMAI A City of Edina Topic: Criteria Page 2 of 3 The City follows a set of criteria (View the staff report ) to identify where sidewalks should go. What additional criteria should the City consider when looking at adding future sidewalks? 10 Responses View Topic Ideas In Action Bike Lanes Edina just hired someone to represent existing residents who are dealing with redevelopment issues... we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassment. Remove bushes on 42nd St. concealing Weber Park Portable "Path Flooded" Sign at Bredesen Path Flooded Sign at Bredesen Park Recent Activity Bette Anderson created an Idea Dave Bender answered a Discussion Bill Strait voted on an Idea Bill Strait answered a Discussion MaFe Strait created an Idea Participants V t. httn• / /cnPakiim -.dins nrQ/ rlicr ..riccinnc /cirlPwalk- farilitiPC -man 11/24/2014 City of Edina City of Edina • Home Discussions • Forums Sigh Jkas • Meetings • Surveys Email - email drgs� Passwo password... or, Sign Im -.Profile Connect • Sign In • Help Like 1• Sign Out Tweet Share '§T-1 1 Page 1 of 33 Discussion: Sidewalk Facilities Map The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidewalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new map will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. There are four public meetings scheduled to gather input based on the City's four quadrants: 2 Topics 98 Answers Closes 2014 -11 -30 View Discussion 0 • Edit • Delete Topic: Future Sidewalks View the man of the proposed sidewalk plan. Do you have any additional suggestions on where future sidewalks should go? If so, where? 88 Responses 88 Responses Nancy Killilea about 1 mouth ago Please lead the discussion with SLP to improve the sidewalk on Morningside from Oakdale to Wooddale. Especially with the new development and increased traffic is imperative that we overcome the bureaucracy that continues to stand in the way of safety and community needs. 1�44r.• / /nr+vnlnir�nrli++n nrr. /� +nminnin+�n /n�rlo��roll� fnnili4inn rv�nr� /4nr�inn /f,ifiirn_nirlcwnlLn 1 1/ AMA1A City of Edina 4 Supports Reply to Nancy Killilea Suppor t nit Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin Reply to Nancy Killilea Larry Olson about 1 month ago Page 2 of 33 This looks like a well laid out and well thought out plan. It's good to see the criteria which determines where future sidewalks should go. It's not saying to put a sidewalk on every street. With the new PACs funding from a franchise fee on gas and electric bills, the burden of paying for these sidewalks is relieved from homeowners. Also, sidewalks on school routes are plowed by the city. 10 Supports Reply to Lam Olson Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... V ISKIIE Sean Hayford Oleary about 1 month ago Reply to Larry Olson Two specific gaps not addressed by the plan: the west side of York/Xerxes ave is missing sidewalk for 100 -200 feet just north of 66th St (a right turn simply cuts into the space of the sidewalk and completely replaces it). This should be marked as future sidewalk. I also think both sides of the 77th St overpass of TH 100 must be marked for future sidewalks. I understand the existing bridge may not be wide enough to do this -- but future means future. In the long run, it is not reasonable to expect pedestrians on the north side to cross 4 intersections in this busy interchange when they should only have to cross 2. I also think that there should be substantially more sidewalks in the gridded portions of Edina (bordering Hopkins and Minneapolis). Sidewalks create huge value and provide great mobility options for denser, gridded blocks (as they do right now in the Country Club District). 5 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Support • Delete Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin about 1 month ago Thanks for your suggestions Sean! The W. 77th Street bridge over Highway 100 is part of a minor arterial, and should indeed have sidewalks indicated for both sides. That change will be made. As for the west side of Xerxes Ave north of W. 66th, right -of -way restrictions may be an issue there but we will look to incorporate that into our plan as well. Thanks again! 1 Support Hide Replies Support 1,4fn• / /er,aolf- ,,,,P.l;na nrrt/ rlicn„ ec; nnc /C;/1P�x7allr_fAMll't1PC_YYIAI' /if1111f.0 /fl li'77YP- C1f1P.VVAIKC 1 1040014 City of Edina Page 3 of 33 Linda Holland Lutgen at November 15, 2014 at 9:20pm CST The part on Xerxes should really be pursued as much as possible. A simple bike ride to the mall, to Barnes and Nobel or Target/ Centennial Lakes is hampered by this intersection and the next two blocks. There is no safe place to ride or walk with the kids, unless you cross the street and then there is not a good crossing area to get back over. down Xerxes is a hazard. 1 Support Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin : omment ... 00 e c i1 Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :omment ... i 1. I�!I Sean Hayford Oleary about 1 month ago Reply to Mark Nolan Reply to Sean Hayford Cleary And apologies for the double posting, but the Delete button doesn't work in Chrome or Firefox. If an administrator were so inclined to delete one of those posts (and this one), that would be great! 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Support Jordan Gileenbach admin about 1 month ago Thanks for the heads up, Sean! I've deleted the double post and will let our vendor know of the issue. 0 Supports Reply to Jordan Gileenbach Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin : omment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach liltr�• / /cr,aolri�r�a�ino nrn/r lianiraoinna /cirla»r�llr_f�nilitiac_ more / *nr�ire /fi�fiira_ei�a�:rallre 1 1 MA11M A I City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin Page 4 of 33 comment .. n X, Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary David Frenkel about I month ago I am a proponent of sidewalks but there is a large group of people opposed to them. For the sake of transparency how is the city taking both views into account in building new sidewalks? 1 Support`Reply to David Frenkel Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin mment... Reply to David Frenkel V.. William David about 1 month ago I fully support adding sidewalks in the recommended areas of Chowen Park (including next to my house on 60th St.) Both 58th and 60th Streets are heavily traveled by both drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Sidewalks and minor traffic calming modifications will slow speeding traffic and make it safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Our family hopes the City implements these improvements soon! 8 Supports Hide Replies Reply to William David Support .loan Orth about I month ago I agree. There is quite a bit of pedestrian traffic on W. 60th St. between France and Xerxes, as well as 58th St. One pedestrian was killed between Xerxes and York. The morning or evening sun is a contributing hazard. 1 Support Reply to Joan Orth Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin mment... Reply to Joan Orth htt„ / /enaalrnriPrl ;na nrrr /dien»ce;nne /cirla xrallr _ fareilitiae- man /tnnirtc /firfirra_ciriPwalkc 1 1 /24no14 City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... n V William David about 1 month ago Reply to William David Page 5 of 33 I fully support adding sidewalks in the recommended areas of Chowen Park (including next to my house on 60th St.) Both 58th and 60th Streets are heavily traveled by both drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Sidewalks and minor traffic calming modifications will slow speeding traffic and make it safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Our family hopes the City implements these improvements soon! 5 Supports Hide Replies Reply to William David Support I■ Linda Holland Luteen at November 15, 2014 at 9:23pm CST I would love to see these installed also. There is currently no safe way for kids in our neighborhood to get to school, biking up 58th and crossing at the 58th/ France intersection is scary. 60th and 58th are major bus stop roads. Kids are out in the intersections throughout winter and it is so not safe. And 60th is just as difficult as the morning sun, makes it almost impossible to see pedestrians and kids waiting for the bus for a few months out of the year. 0 Supports Reply to Linda Holland Luteen Support Mark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin comment ... Reply to Linda Holland Lutgen dark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin Reply to William David Karen Sandler Steinert Karen Sandler Steinert about 1 month ago Thank you for including West 62nd Street bordering Pamela Lake in the plan. This street is very dangerous to pedestrians and given that it is near a park that is currently expanding its parking lot, the addition of sidewalks are much needed. 5 Supports Reply to Karcn Sandler Steinert Karen Sandler Steinert Support 1,1+r.• / /ns.nnln.r�orl;nn non / ; nn.• nn; nrn/ n;. io.,. �1L_ f�..; l; 4ino_ mo r /4nr.;ne /fi.fi.ra_c ;�aazrollre 11 MA11 11 A City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... Reply to Karen Sandler Steinert Karen Sandler Steinert O Chris Bremer about 1 month ago Page 6 of 33 I am glad to see the proposed sidewalks on Xerxes, Beard, and 60th, as well as on the east side of France. I hope that, when these sidewalks are put in, the unnecessarily wide streets will be made narrower, in keeping with the adopted Living Streets policy -- that would make things safer by slowing traffic and might also save a number of trees. I would like to see the short stretch of sidewalk on France Ave in front of Fairview Southdale Hospital put in place -- any chance the hospital would fund that rather than waiting for the city to pay for it? It would allow everyone who leaves east of France to walk to Southdale without having to cross France Ave (via the sidewalk from Ewing to France, by Hwy 62). 5 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Chris Bremer Suppor[ Isaac Broberc about 1 month ago Lets keep in mind also it is hard enough for those of us living on France Ave to pull out of our driveways. At the current time most of us have a parking buffer where we are able to pull into. Albeit, often times still honked at by drivers who are speeding by no less as if we are in their way. France works just fine with one side of sidewalk near my place around 58th to the hwy, I rarely see people walking by. 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Isaac Broberg Support Sean Hayford Oleary about I month ago The trouble with a really busy street like France having a sidewalk on only one side is that people on the "wrong" side of the street have to get across the very busy street to access the sidewalk. Just as it's hard to get out of your driveway, it's very hard to negotiate a gap in traffic to cross if you don't happen to be at a light. France is also a bus route, so it can be difficult to access and wait at stops without sidewalks on both sides. If no pedestrians are present, then it should be OK to pull into the sidewalk area (after checking for peds) to better see traffic on France. 2 Supports Support u Chris Bremer about 1 month ago If they included some landscaped bumpouts on France along with a sidewalk it could provide protection for residents as they exit their driveways, as well as affording pedestrians on a new sidewalk a bit more separation from traffic.. I Support Support 1li"tt1• / /er�aolnir�ailina nrrt /�1ic�iiecinne /cirl Pyirallr_fanilitiac_ many /tnnirc /fi �fi �ra_cirl Pyx�allrc 111)A1') 1A City of Edina 1_ Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin ,omment ... Reply to Isaac Broberg Sean Hayford Oleary about 1 month ago Page 7 of 33 Agreed -- Xerxes is horrendously wide, especially between Crosstown and 66th. I appreciate the value of on -street parking on these streets, but it would be nicer if it were broken up by bumpouts (like Lyndale just north of Minnehaha Creek). 1 Support Hide Replies Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary Support Chris Bremer about 1 month ago Xerxes happens to be a county road, which is how we got the ugly bumpouts north of the Crosstown on that street -- they just don't have the money to do something attractive as an add -on. Though when the street is totally reconstructed perhaps they could do something. Well- placed bumpouts would make it easier for people to get out of their driveways. 1 Support Support mark Nolan, Transportation Planner ad min :omment ... f Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary RvAl Mark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin .omment... Reply to Chris Bremer . San Asato about 1 month ago Who maintains them? Who pays for maintenance costs? 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to San Asato Support 1�1- Fri• / /nr�nnLnr.n` lino nrn/ �1+ onnaainno /Qt�1P \1rollr_T7/Hlti/PQ_TYIOTI /i'n117 /�CIT�IiIrP_CI�P \17a11tC 11 /Idhfl1 d City of Edina Page 8 of 33 Isaac Broberg about 1 month ago Good question. I hope everyone keeps in mind that Edina plows the sidewalks in the winters so more sidewalks means more maintenance costs all the way around. 1 Support Hide Replies Reply to Isaac Broberg Support • Delete Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin about 1 month ago Edina's Public Works crews plow sidewalks that are on State Aid and County roadways, sidewalks that are adjacent/leading to parks and schools, and in a few other cases. For all other sidewalks (mostly in residential streets /neighborhoods) it is the property owner's responsibility to remove snow. Other costs associated with sidewalk maintenance are funded by a combination of the Public Works budget and the PACS Fund (htto://edinammeov /vacs fund). Thanks. 3 Supports Support Katherine Stelberg Bass about 1 month ago Yes, that is correct. There will be maintenance costs for sidewalks, just as there are for roads. Sidewalks are a transportation network for many residents, especially children and older residents who don't drive. It seems perfectly acceptable for the city (and its residents) to provide this public service for all residents, not just the ones who drive. i 7 Supports SSu port r" Scott Vogel at November 17, 2014 at 9:53am CST I'm confused. I live in Edina on Xerxes (county road) and not once in the 6 years I've lived here has Edina Public Works plowed our sidewalk. I think it's because it's only 2 blocks of sidewalk on the edge of Edina that we get overlooked ?? 0 Supports Suppor t Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment ... d Reply to Isaac Broberg 7n M�'�'T• //(�11�•1t111M�1Yf Y1 .].AYh /A1nn11C�C�l/�HC� /O1�P11 �0I�_T•]l�tli4ia�_ more /tnr�i�e /fiifiira_cirlP.x,allic - 11IW')0 l.a_ , City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... v ■ Dave Bender about 1 month ago Reply to San Asato Page 9 of 33 I support the plan and sidewalks generally. They'll make the neighborhoods more livable and, properly done, will increase property values. I would like to see a sidewalk added to the plan on Code Avenue, connecting the proposed sidewalks on Valley View and Benton. That would create a nice walking loop, shorter than going all the way out to Hansen. We especially need a sidewalk along Valley View, from Benton to at least Code. That's a natural walking route, and many people with and without pets walk it, but the cars really haul on the diagonal stretch form Normandale Lutheran to the block past Code (where it makes a sharp right). It would be good to get a sidewalk along there before a tragedy happens. 6 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Dave Bender Support Tom LaForce about 1 month ago That sidewalk on Valley View was proposed to be part of the Birchcrest B neighborhood reconstruction project. People living on Valley View opposed it, and the council pulled it out of the project. If the sidewalk plan is adopted, it would be good to see that sidewalk reconsidered because the neighborhood reconstruction was delayed until next year and both projects could be done more economically together than as separate projects. 1 Support Hide Replies Reply to Toni LaForce Support ■ Kate Frederick about 1 month ago I live on the comer of Valley View and Mildred, and I would fully support the proposed sidewalk along our property. Drivers fly around the comers here, and it's just not safe for walkers and bikers. I would hope this public discussion means that more than just the people who live along a particular stretch of proposed sidewalk get to have their opinion considered. 6 Supports Suppor t Mark Nolan, Transportation Planneradmin comment ... ^' dl 5 Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... V Reply to Tom LaForce Reply to Dave Bender 1,++ «.//.. «....1... «...7: «.. ....../.7:.......+.+... «.. /..: ,1 n...nlli n:1:4:on mnr. /4�r.:nc+ /T 1fi lY� -[.1�1 P \i)/]1LC• 11 /7d /')OlA City of Edina Page 10 of 33 claire lee about 1 month ago I love that a new sidewalk is being put in on Vernon by Garden Park. I'm not sure who could address the possibility of adding a pedestrian crossing on Vernon and Garden Park. As of now if you're on the north side of Vernon and want to get over to Garden Park you take your life in your hands and then may have to climb over a barrier.. Thanks for adding the sidewalk from Maloney over to the dog park. 6 Supports Reply to claire Iee,Support binrk Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... n y Amy Olson about 1 month ago Reply to claire lee It's great to see all of this support for sidewalks. I live on Cornelia Drive between Rosland Park and Cornelia Elementary and I can tell you that we have it lot of pedestrian traffic that would be much safer if they could use a sidewalk. Kids walking to school (my own son included), families walking to the park and pool, etc. Currently, with cars and pedestrians sharing the streets there are many: times that the pedestrians have to hop up on the curb (which is impossible in winter),- or cars have to come to a stop if there are two cars passing each other on the road or one car is passing a parked car. It's dangerous. 7 Supports Reply to Amy Olson Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... p 1i Katherine Stelbere Bass about 1 month ago. Reply to Amy Olson I am grateful for the careful consideration of criteria and time the city has put into this plan. The network of sidewalks proposed seems quite reasonable and fairly conservative -- this is certainly not a "sidewalks on every street" plan that some have predicted. I have a couple of suggestions to consider as'addifions -- Indian Hills Pass- while it is a short road; it functions as a neighborhood collector and is directly across from Creek Valley Elementary. I've heard other parents from CV talk about the need for a safe facility for kids coming from neighborhoods directly across from the school. Do we know what the volumes are on that road? Also, Gleason Road has sidewalk on the west side, but could we consider a short segment on the east side with a terminus at Gleason Circle ? There are many CV kids on Gleason Circle who walk to school and this would help them get up to Valley View without crossing mid- block. Thank you! 4 Supports Reply to Katherine Stelberg Bass Support httnr / /cr►aalnrnarlina nrrr /rlicri ice; nns /cirlaEvAl lr_far.ilitiac_ man /tnrninc /fiifi ire_cirlayarallrc . 1 1 19aINnla City of Edina Durk Nolan. Transportation Planner admin comment... A V ■ Emily Boettee about 1 month ago Page 11 of 33 Reply to Katherine Stelberg Bass Edina has worked hard to improve pedestrian facilities and it is so nice to see the future sidewalk plan continue the effort toward making walking safe and accessible. We are so lucky to live in a city with great schools, it is encouraging to see that a high priority has been placed on creating safe routes to school for our kids. This thoughtful plan highlights activity corridors where there is already a lot of pedestrian traffic and aims to put sidewalks where they are needed most. 6 Supports Reply to Emily Boettge Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A V ■ Sanna Swaroou about 1 month ago Reply to Emily Boettge I am very happy that the City of Edina takes our transportation infrastructure seriously and has developed a strong plan to increase safety for pedestrians, especially children walking to school and our elderly neighbors. I appreciate that the City has identified the most important gaps and prioritized them in a way that balances need and cost. 6 Supports Reply to Sapna Swaroop Support Dlark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A V Dleean Flynn about 1 month ago Reply to Sapna Swaroop I'd love to see sidewalks on Monterey to allow children to get to the park at Susan Lindgren more easily and safely! 1 Support Reply to Megan Flynn Support .,:.7,......11... 11 MAMA1A City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A V Joel Stegner, Community volunteer about t month ago Reply to Megan Flynn Page 12 of 33 I am on Barrie Road, two blocks north of 66th. The traffic study has a top end traffic count of 3650, among the highest in the city. Barrie/Heritage is the one way out of our neighborhood, is very curvy, with lots of cars parked on the street by the Colony and Heritage properties, includes Edina Towers and houses lots of elderly and lower income people. It is dangerous to walk to the south into Fairview Southdale and surrounding medical buildings or to Southdale, because there is no continuous sidewalk. Seniors should be out walking just as much as children, and the lack of sidewalks practically forces them to drive short distance. Given the 20+ year timeline, how many of them will still be alive when a sidewalk gets put in. I don't see any time lines on the plans. Without timelines, it simply could become a very politicized process which doesn't serve the city well. 2 Supports Reply to Joel Stegner Sport F"OQ , I - - Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A V Misty Higgins about 1 month ago Reply to Joel Stegner I was surprised to see that the the comer of 55th and Beard is not on the proposed sidewalk list. Hundreds of people walk this area every day to access the bridge that goes over the creek at this intersection. Is it too late to be considered? 1 Support Reply to Misty Higgins Support ni Mirk Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A d Dustin Carlson about 1 month ago Reply to Misty Higgins From up in the Brookside Heights neighborhood, I agree with Claire Lee's comment about adding a pedestrian crossing near Garden Park. Here's a situation where there is a lot of road (Vernon) between the Tracy and Eden Avenue crosswalks, so people will cross a high - traffic, high -speed road on their own. Plus, aren't non -stop light crosswalks fairly inexpensive ways to promote walking? The more crosswalks we add across the city, the more drivers will see walkers and learn to share the road with people on foot. There's a great crosswalk on on Interlachen Blvd near Vernon and even though motorists largely disregard it... at least it's a place to get pedestrians predictably crossing the road. More of these low -cost paint -and- signage crosswalks please (no flashing lights needed). httn• / /cnanlnrnarlina nrrr/r licriiccinne /cirlavxrallr_fanilitiac _man /tnnirc /fiifiirP_cirlavxrallre 11 MA11 1A City of Edina 2 Supports Reply to Dustin Carlson Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... A Y kristen rice about 1 month ago Reply to Dustin Carlson Page 13 of 33 I (and other local residents) would like to see a sidewalk put on Valley View-Road from lower Mark Terrace up to Gleason. This is a stretch of road traveled by students on the way to the middle and high schools. This road has always been a pretty heavily traveled road, and it is getting more congested as people seem to use it as a cut through during rush hour times to avoid the highways. I understand that there is a plan to put in a sidewalk from McCauley to lower Mark Terrace and I believe that is necessary. However, I believe that the stretch to the high school should have greater priority since kids are using it to walk to school - or would be instead of their parents driving them because of safety concerns. I do not understand why an additional sidewalk was added in front of St. Pat's when one was already on the other side of the street. I realize funding is always an issue but The Safe Routes to School Committee felt this was necessary, yet apparently do not feel a sidewalk on Valley View Road, where there is none, was necessary first. I grew up in this neighborhood and am now raising my children here - this sidewalk issue has been something that has been talked about by residents for over 40 years. 6 Supports Hide Replies Reply to kristen rice Support Amy K at November 14, 2014 at 5:06pm CST We 100% agree with this. We live on this stretch of Valley View Rd and have 3 kids that like to walk to school but don't because of the fast drivers and blind curves. We are hoping they complete the sidewalk from lower Mark Terrace to Gleason very soon after the stretch from 169 frontage road to lower Mark Terrace. We will gladly give up part of our yard and mature trees for the safety of kids, people and dogs. This section of sidewalk is way overdue. 4 Supports Reply to Amy K Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admire comment... d Nlark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... �y Reply to Amy K Reply to kristen rice 1�t+r+• / /C11P91n7r+Pl11H9 nrn/ �ionriooinnc /cirlogs�ollr_f�nilitiao_ more / +nr+inc /iiifiira_oirla�»ollrc I IMA1101A City of Edina Jennifer Haenel about 1 month ago Page 14 of 33 I'm very much in support of sidewalks, especially as noted along Oaklawn Ave. However, a proposed sidewalk on Oaklawn Ave. looks to connect to existing sidewalks to the south, cutting through private property. Is this an error on the map? 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Jennifer Haenel Support �1 • Delete Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin about 1 month ago Ms. Haenel, the City of Edina holds a utility easement in this location, split 50150 between the two adjacent properties. The City's Active Routes to School Plan recommended making this connection, and Edina has been approved for funding for this connection by the Three Rivers Park District (the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will be constructed on Parklawn Ave in 2017). Prior to any construction, the affected property owners will be involved in discussions regarding this trail connection. 1 Support Hide Replies Support t Jennifer Haenel about 1 month ago Thanks for clarifying! 0 Supports Support Rlark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... D1ark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... N V DK Zabel about 1 month ago Reply to Mark Nolan Reply to Jennifer Haenel Thank you for putting a future sidewalk where W 66th and Tracy Ave are combined and then following up through Tracy Ave. There are a lot of school kids and pedestrians that use this half block strip and have no safe place to walk. Traffic is moderately consistent here and it is dangerous at times, especially during the winter months with ice and snow on the roads and during the summer when the Buckthorn overgrowth and visibility of pedestrians is blocked at the stop sign of Valley View Rd and W. 66th/Tracy Ave. I look forward this sidewalk, it cannot come soon enough. Thank you!! 3 Supports Reply to DK Zabel Support 11r+1,•//�, o�L,,,,o�l;,,� .,r..IA; on- cc; ^"c /o;APx / 011r _TO/+1 an /T IiITP_Q1rt- tirnIIre 11MAMO1A City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :omment ... v Y; fir. Jim Strombere aboui 1 month ago Reply to DK Zabel . Page 15 of 33 Another place that could use 'more' sidewalk is 49th St., between France and Maple. Presently, there is a short stretch of sidewalk on the south side of 49th that only crosses two pieces of property. This two -block stretch of 49th is heavily traveled by cars that try and avoid the traffic around 50th and France. The road also has a hill midway through that two -block stretch, which also makes walking along this street more hazardous than normal. It would be great if - at some point in time - this busy little street could have, a sidewalk to help residents in this area negotiate the neighborhood without putting their lives in danger. Thanks for'listening'. 1 Support Hide Replies Reply to Jim Strombera Support Bennett Porter about 1 month ago I agree with'the need for a sidewalk on 49th. The 2012 sidewalk addition to Halifax Ave from 51st to 54th solved a similar problem of getting to 50th/France'dining and walking. Other busy neighborhood streets. including Arden Ave from 50th to Arden Park then east to 52nd/Halifax would also benefit from a sidewalk for the safety of our community. 1 Support Reply to Bennett Porter Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :omment ... S NI ark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :omment ... OA Reply to Bennett Porter Reply to Jim Stromberg tonva wilhoit 28 days ago I do not see West 59th Street on the plans. This street from Wooddale to Concord is a main street for Concord Elementary. More than 20 children walk to /from Concord on West 59th Street every day. Also, parents, teachers and buses are speeding down this street to get to school. There are no stop signs from Wooddale to Concord on West 59th Street either. On West 59th Street this sidewalk could go from Pamela Park to Concord 1,r+ „• / /nr,o.,l,,,, oa;�� �r../. i; nm, nn;�ni'Io;lla�xrolL_fon,l;tinc_ mgr \Itnnire /Fi,fiwa_cirlaxx�allre 11. 1 /),1 0 1 A City of Edina Page 16 of 33 Elementary. This would seem like a likely spot for a sidewalk and it fits the criteria: routes to school, transit stop on wooddale, logical connection between destinations, it would promote safety in children walking/biking to school. PLEASE CONSIDER WEST 59th STREET- Children walk on this very busy street to the school! 3 Supports Reply to tonva wilhoit Suupori sue. Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... n V �i. _vsu �•. Peter Choukalas 28 days ago Reply to tonya wilhoit' Just a few comments concerning the sidewalk plan. Making Edina a more pedestrian-biker friendly community is a positive move. Now, if we could just get more drivers to pay attention to us pedestrians and bikers .............. .................:...........As to the sidewalk plan, consider the following: A. Complete the sidewalk along Normandale Road so that it meets the 9 mile Creek Regional Trail. B. Continue a walkway around Lake Edina. It's not a long walk, but would be good for meeting neighbors. C. The walk bridge crossing Highway #62 between Highway #100 and France Ave. was not included on the map. D. Consider completing the sidewalk from Cornelia School along Mavelle Drive to Lynmar Lane to the north or Sandell Ave to the north or both to West 70th Street. Also, consider completing the sidewalk south on Lynmar Lane to West 72nd Street. E. Continue the walkway on the north side of Fred Richards into the park (after The Fred closes to connect with the regional trail that will go through the park. F. Last, which of the new sidewalks, trails, etc. will be maintained by the City of Edina in the fall and winter; i.e. cleaned of wet leaves in the fall, and cleared of snow in the winter? Thank -you. 2 Supports Reply to Peter Choukalas Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... n V Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman-28 days ago Reply to Peter Choukalas I strongly second adding a sidewalk on 59th Street between Wooddale Ave. and Concord Elementary. The residential neighborhood in this area is very dense and full of Concord children with 1) no bus service and 2) no safe walking route to school. Anyone who observes 59th Street during to "to" and "from" school time will immediately see the problem. 59th is THE STREET thatmalkers use to get to school - it is the main, and direct artery leading to Concord Elementary and the neighborhood funnels to this street as a sort of "safety in numbers" default. Countless families walk this route to and from school, and sadly, share the'pavement with speeding cars and buses rushing to and from'Concord, as 59th is also the direct route for vehicles between Wooddale and Concord' Making the pedestrian route worse, is all the overflow, on -street parking (on 59th) the completely bottlenecks.59th at our kids most vulnerable time. With no sidewalks, and cars parked on both sides of the street, we literally walk down the middle of the busy road, with the sunrise in the east making it hard for us to be seen, rushing buses, teachers, and parents. It's just a bad situation. A number of us have noted that a sidewalk looks planned for 60th street, which is fine, but 59th should be prioritized ahead of 60th. 59th is_ simply . THE commuter artery for cars, buses, and most importantly, pedestrians. It needs help; A sidewalk would connect a densely populated neighborhood to 1) a public elementary school with no bus service in the neighborhood, 2) numerous public transportation stops, 3) sports fields, community centers, voter locations. etc. It simply screams "sidewalk ". Thank you! 3 Supports Reply to Sara Kaufinan Sara Kaufman Support 1.1— Fr.• / /or.nol.- ....nrlinn nrn/ �ionnooinna/ oirlatv�llr _farilitiPC_mort /tnrti r•e /fi ifi i ra_ei rl Pta,a l lrc 11 /7a / ?01 A City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... n David Krueger 15 days ago Page 17 of 33 Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman I'm very pleased to see there is a sidewalk proposed for Cornelia Drive between 66th and 70th. My family lives on this block and we would love to have a sidewalk! 4 Supports Reply to David Krueger Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A b 1Villiam Stiles at November 10, 2014 at 3:57pm CST Reply to David Krueger Suggest you change the name of the Creek Valley Baptist Church as it is a new church now and it is used as a voting place. Other recommendations are fine. 0 Supports Reply to William Stiles Suppo rt Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... OA b .lim Strombere at November 13, 2014 at 8:50am CST Reply to William Stiles After watching the City Council meeting of November 3, and the complaints from citizens living along a proposed sidewalk route, it's extremely gratifying to read the many posts on this site from people that are looking to make walking a safer experience. Thank you to all who are responding in this positive fashion - we need to look beyond our NIMBY reactions to see that creating safe access to everywhere in our community is a 'positive' for all. None of us want to see someone killed or injured when a simple sidewalk can safe a life. Keep the suggestions coming, and thanks again for looking out for young, old, and everyone in- between. 6 Supports Reply to Jim Strombere Support 1.++,,• / /nr�nnlr....nrlinn n... /ilinn»nnin�n /c irin�ssnlL innili+ inn_ mnr . /4nr�inn /fi�4�irn_niiln�s�nlLa 1 1 MA11 11 A City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admix M.11 Reply to Jim Stromberg Page 18 of 33 Danielle A at November 13, 2014 at 9:03am CST I strongly believe sidewalks should be added connecting Wooddale to France Avenue along 54th Street and connecting Wooddale to the frontage road along Golf Terrace. Because of the width of these streets, cars go very fast and it's not safe for children to walk. Also, though the Frontage road on the East side of 100 has a sidewalk, there is no safe way to cross the frontage road for children. Cars go extremely fast on the frontage road, "and at our intersection, there's a somewhat blind spot for cars approaching from the South traveling North, especially if they are traveling over 20 miles per hour. We live basically two long blocks to our children' school (Normandale), but our children take the bus because crossing the frontage road is unsafe, cars travel too quickly down the frontage road, there's no buffer (grass) between the sidewalk and the curb, and there is no sidewalk in the interior neighborhood, which would be a safer route to school and easily walkable: Because we are within a 1/2 mile of a huge plot of land that contains THREE schools, I believe all of these streets should be added to the safe - walk-to- school list. Specifically for the Golf Terrace Heights neighborhood, sidewalks should be added to Sherman and Dalrymple, as well as around Lake Harvey on Lakeview / Golf Terrace, on either the interior or exterior side of the street. Aside from making this a safe way for neighborhood children to walk to school (and there are children who can SEE the Community Center from their driveway to take the bus because there's no safe walking route), literally dozens, and in the summertime over a hundred (sometimes hundreds), of people walk around Lake Harvey every day. Trees on the lake combined with cars traveling around the curves of the lake make for a very dangerous pedestrian situation on the perimeter of Lake Harvey (Golf Terrace and Lakeview). 3.Supports Reply to Danielle A Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :omment ... Reply to Danielle A Katie Hein at November 13, 2014 at 11:46am CST So happy to see the proposed sidewalk running along 66th street from Ridgeview. drive to highway 100 bridge and also along Warren Ave. to Normandale Park. With the number of runners, children and the way people drive through this neighborhood to cut through and avoid highways, I have been very concerned for a long time that someone is eventually going to get hurt. Hoping this particular route is given high priority! Thank you! 4, Supports Reply to Katie Hein Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin h�+..• / /:..enl�,. «n4:.. ... /1;n . ten/ nirin�.+ nll.. innititinn_ rviire /4nr�inn %fiifiwn_oirliatit�lho 1,1 /M /Ii)IA' City of Edina Page 19 of 33 comment.. ^ Y Reply to Katie Hein s Lee leckenlaible at November 13, 2014 at 3:21pm CST I was pleased to see the city's plan•for Sidewalks moving forward. I believe that most of them make sense. The one sidewalk I strongly oppose is along West 60th St. between Valley View and Hansen. Moving West along 60th, after my house (5104 W 60th) there are 6 -10 very Large Trees that would need to be removed and this would hurt our neighborhood significantly. I've spoken with 3 other immediate neighbors and they were all strongly opposed to the sidewalk on w 60th. It would diminish the integrity of our neighborhood by removing large trees, shrubs, bushes and some younger trees as well. . 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Lee Heckenlaible Support Neal Blanchett at November 15, 2014 at 12:42pR CST Possibly the street could be narrowed or sidewalk could go on the other side? Please don't prematurely oppose any sidewalk before the engineers have a chance to find a possible win -win. 2 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Neal Blanchett Support Lee Heckenlaible at November 19, 2014 at11:04pm CST The map clearly shows the intended side of road. Power lines are on 1 side, the other has 10+ major trees in a row. I have not met 1 person in this neighborhood wants it. Drive down w 60th stgoing west from hwy 100 and you'll see. Project time and costs here would be exponentially higher. 0 Supports St_pport t Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin )mment ... Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :mment ... z� a i Mary Bane at November 14, 2014 at 11:07am CST Reply to Neal Blanchett Reply to Lee Heckenlaible 11 MA/ MIA City of. Edina I'm happy to see plans for sidewalks -- increase safety and encourage walkers! 2 Supports Reply to Mary Bana Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment... % Reply to Mary Bang Page 20 of 33 FT- .v.YttliYlY is - Mike Matuszak at November 14, 2014 at 8:46pm CST We desperately need sidewalks running,down both sides of Interlachen Blvd, as well as speed bumps to slow down the dangerous motorists who like to fly down the highway; beginning from Vernon Ave. Very little if any patrolling takes place and_residents /pedestrians have no safe option for walking the dog or kids to the park or otherwise navigating the road. You are putting your life at risk if you chose to cross the road. In addition, blind grades ( Vandervork and Interlachen area) make pulling out of driveways nearly impossible due to speed of motorists and the high volume of traffic. The current bike path doesn't serve local residents it only adds to traffic congestion and safety concerns. Sidewalks and speed bumps are long overdue. If those on our side streets don't agree, I would challenge them to consider their thoughts if folks opted to race down their streets once Interlachen becomes too jammed up'. 3 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Mike Matuszak Support Neal Blanchett at November 15, 2014 at 12:44pm CST I agree, I bike Interlachen frequently and the car traffic is too fast and too close. 3 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Neal Blanchett Support Mark Elvers at November 15, 2014 at 8:25pm CST Yes! I also bike interlachen frequently to get up to the bike paths north of Excelsior. It's nice that there are bike lanes on this road - but they are shot! Pot holes, seems, divots, dirt, etc. - and then the west bound lane disappears around the comer by mirror lake where interlachen turns north. I always try to hold a line tight to the side of the road so as to not delay motorists - but this is impossible through this stretch as the bike lane disappears., 1 Support Support Y, Tom x at November 20, 2014 at 9:52am CST Agree, Mike Matuszak. Additionally, the ped crossing that was placed with the small section of new sidewalk on Interlachen. at Vandevork is totally ignored by motorists even when you stand on the side with a stroller waiting to cross. Sidewalks on both sides would be huge for residents to get to the parks located on either side of Interlachen. 0 Supports Support hffr.• / /or.onlr��r.nrl ;nn err' /rl;o— oo;^"o /ai rlocsrnlL_foni 1i4; ae_m or 1fr%" ;re /A ifi ira_e; rlaxxra l Ire 11 OAP)n1A City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin Reply to Neal Blanchett Reply to Mike Matuszak Page 21 of 33 Kirsten Gullickson at November 14, 2014 at 10:36pm CST I applaud the City of Edina for its comprehensive sidewalk installation plan. Sidewalks are an asset to every community in which they exist, and Edina needs more of them. I am a lifelong resident of Edina and have always wondered why sidewalks aren't present on more of our streets. They provide safety, encourage activity and expand community interaction. Residents who have moved to Edina from other communities, both from within the state and from outside Minnesota, lament the, lack of sidewalks here. Over the years, I have lived in several• different neighborhoods within Edina. For the past 17 years, my husband and I and our children have lived in the South Cornelia neighborhood. Everyday I walk my dog on West Shore Drive,. and I feel strongly that a sidewalk is needed along the entire length of West Shore Drive. It's a-high- traffic'street.and is dangerous for "pedestrians (and our dogs). Additionally, Oaklawn Avenue from Claremore Drive/W. 72nd Street to Gilford Drive is in desperate need of a sidewalk, particularly for school children who use the street to walk to and from Cornelia Elementary. A sidewalk has been needed for years on Cornelia Drive from W. 66th,Street to W. 72nd Street. It, too, has a large volume of traffic which shares the. road with numerous school -aged children and other pedestrians who use the street. . I am pleased to see so many proponents of sidewalks in the posted responses. Frankly, I was flabbergasted to read in "The Edina Sun" that some residents' are opposed to sidewalks, citing that their landscaping is more important to them than sidewalks, and that they are alarmed that they,will lose °a few feet of their lawns to sidewalks. I find that kind of thinking truly perplexing and short- sighted. Edina residents responded in surveys that expanded walkability and 'enhanced livability is a primary value. The installation of additional sidewalks in our community supports that vision of our city. 5 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Kirsten Gullickson SSu port Alison Pence at November 20, 2014 at 4:19pm CST I agree! I grew up in your neighborhood and as a child/teen I walked my dog on West Shore Drive all the time. The way cars would speed down the hill on this street forced me to frequently jump into people's yards to get out of harm's way. West Shore Drive is such a high- traffic pedestrian route to get to Lake Cornelia, I certainly hope it gets a sidewalk. It has needed one for 30+ years! 1 Support Reply to Alison Pence Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin mment... Reply to Alison Pence 11IIA /7l11A City of Edina Page 22 of 33 Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin �Yjj Reply to Kirsten Gullickson itiht: ✓iF'VU+'. RS AARSON at November 14, 2014 at 10:41pm CST Thrilled to see the sidewalks along McCauley Trail and Valley View Road. With all that the Braemar fields have to offer, there NEEDS to be pedestrian and bike access. I have not felt safe allowing my kids to walk or bike there, which is so sad. 4 Supports Reply to RS LARSON Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin Reply to RS (ARSON Annie Cronin at November 15, 2014 at 8:55am CST I strongly supported sidewalks and new lighting for the Highlands neighborhood several years ago when our roads were redone. It would been more cost effective to istall the sidewalks and lighting at that time. Our lighting is not effective and not attractive. What people tend to overlook is that sidewalks and good looking lighting raises the value of their home because the neighborhood looks good. Everyone keeps their yard well maintained- sidewalks and good lighting are the bow on a beautiful package for a beautiful neighborhood. I am an avid dog walker and walker of our neighborhood streets. A sidewalk would be much safer. I often have to move to into someones driveway or yard to get out of the way for cars and busses. Someone said that our neighborhood has wide enough streets for foot and car traffic. Yes, the streets may be wide, but it doesn't stop cars and buses from driving safety for foot traffic. I have called the Edina School bus garage many times to have the drivers slow down and pay attention to walkers. I would feel much better with sidewalks. Plus the added fact that sidewalks make the neighborhood look polished and finished. I embrace the added value to my home value and support sidewalks 100 %! Now can we get good looling lamp posts too? 8 Supports Reply to Annie Cronin Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin !I Reply to Annie Cronin Neal Blanchett at November 15, 2014 at 12:54pm CST 114Md 17(llA City of Edina Page 23 of 33 We live in lake Edina neighborhood and strongly support adding a sidewalk on Hibiscus to connect the Normandale and West shore sidewalks, as well as connections to the Nine Mile Creek trail at as many points as feasible. This trail is a tremendous route to the EHS/Valley View /Creek Valley campus, and to stores and restaurants to the east of us. It would be huge improvement over walking in the salty, icy slushy dirty street all winter! 1 Support Reply to Neal Blanchett Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... q V Jay Halvorson at November 15, 2014 at 6:38pm CST Reply to Neal Blanchett I like it!! I often run or walk on Interlachen west of Blake and can say that a sidewalk in very much needed there. The street there is narrow with either retaining walls or steep slopes on either side. 1 Support Reply to Jay Halvorson Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... A, d FMI Stephanie Hu at November 16, 2014 at 7:55pm CST Reply to Jay Halvorson A sidewalk in some neighborhoods is a great addition in others it has some unintended consequences. The sidewalk that is being proposed on Ayrshire Blvd is not wanted by the neighborhood so why does the city keep pushing an expense that our neighborhood doesn't event want? The city pushed it in 2008 and over 90% of the resdients did NOT want the sidewalk. All of us want the same outcome which is a safe, fun, healthy neighborhood that we are all proud to live in. Putting a sidewalk in though is not the answer to the outcome that we are looking for and actually has some unintended consequences. Safety: While safety is certainly of top consideration for all of us with young children, there have been no reported incidents of any accidents on Ayrshire Blvd. Health: What I love about our house is that I get to see everyone jog, walk their kids in strollers, bikers, etc every day. This is one of the healthiest neighborhoods! Beautification of our Neighborhood: A sidewalk would require uprooting two very large trees, which are more attractive for the overall feel of the neighborhood than a sidewalk. Property Value of the Homes in this Neighborhood: We have roughly 7 -10 feet of clearance from our front walkway to the curb and the proposed 5 ft sidewalk would significantly cut into our yard which will significantly cut down on our property value which is unintended consequence that the neighborhood would not be looking for. Why is the city wasting our time and money on this proposal? 2 Supports Reply to Stephanie Hu Support City of Edina [1-40 mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... V Paul Walthour at November 17, 2014 at 9:02am CST Reply to Stephanie Hu Page 24 of 33 What Stephanie say's is true. If there are legitimate, data verified, safety reasons to add sidewalks to a neighborhood, great. But as a rule of thumb, we need to preserve green space in the urban landscape, not add more asphalt and concrete. Surely there are a number of worthwhile projects to spend this kind of money on that would receive higher utilization than the less than 1% of the time this sidewalk will be used? 1 Support Reply to Paul Walthour Support Fntl- Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A Reply to Paul Walthour Liz Denn at November 18, 2014 at 10:23pm CST As a member of the Highlands neighborhood, I strongly supported sidewalks when they were proposed earlier and continue to support the "Living Street" initiative moving forward. As a long time resident of our neighborhood, I have the unique perspective of walking and biking these streets since 1971. As a parent who has had four children attend Highlands Elementary School, I have watched the commute for my children and their neighbors with concern over the past 2 decades. Although I am not sure of the number of "documented" safety concerns, I have witnessed several incidents over the years both as a child and as an adult. Currently, I am teaching at Highlands Elementary and walk to work most days. As I watch our students make the commute to school, the area of most concern centers around the intersection of Ayrshire and Doncaster at the base of the hill. It is my sincere hope, that with the proposed sidewalk on Ayrshire, we will lessen the likelihood of an accident. While safety is my number one concern regarding this issue, especially in the winter months, I also strongly believe in the criteria laid out in the living streets initiative and look forward to all the benefits connectivity will bring to our neighborhood as a whole. 8 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Liz Denn Support John Smith at November 19, 2014 at 7:30pm CST Would you like this sidewalk cutting through your yard and your neighbor's yard? Who is going to plow all of this added sidewalk? If anything, more stop signs or reduced speed zones should be added. 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to John Smith Support Jennifer J at November 20, 2014 at 9:14am CST 1�1Fr�•� /nr�nnl�iir�orlir�n nrn�rlinn�inninrn�nirin��in11� nili4ion rv�nr. /4nv.inn /�..+,..n nirin�s.nit�n 11 MA/'M1 A City of Edina Page 25 of 33 Adding stop signs for the purposes of speed control has been shown to be ineffective and can actually have the unintended consequence of increasing speeds. Speed limits are set in state statute and local authorities have very limited ability to implement reduced speed zones. Drivers will continue to speed when the design speed of the street is faster than the posted speed limit, making posting reduced speed limits generally ineffective absent consistent enforcement. Sidewalks provide a safe place for pedestrians, regardless of vehicle speed. 5 Supports SSu aoR FE] Liz Den n at November 20, 2014 at 8:25pm CST In response to John Smith's question, yes I would continue to support sidewalks in the Highlands neighborhood even if the project directly impacted our property or that of our neighbors. In fact, I not only would, but did. A little neighborhood history ... In 2003, a small group of neighbors on Doncaster initially organized a petition requesting the city do a feasibility study concerning adding a sidewalk on Doncaster between Vernon Ave and Ayshire Blvd. At that time, an additional group of neighbors on Doncaster organized another petition in response, not in favor of sidewalks. The city then implemented a neighborhood survey in August of 2006. We lived on Doncaster during that time, although our home was north of Ayrshire. I find it significant that several of our neighbors on the south block of Doncaster that were slated to be most directly impacted by the project, not only supported moving forward, but were also the ones who had initiated the conversation with the city council back in 2003. It is also significant to note that, of the homes surveyed on the north block of Doncaster, 7 of the 8 families supported moving forward with the project. While the north block of Doncaster was not initially slated for sidewalks, it is now as part of the new living streets initiative and I continue to support this effort to enhance safety and connectivity. Our family has since moved to the east side of the Highlands neighborhood where conversations concerning sidewalks continue. When an additional sidewalk was proposed for Ayrshire between Vernon and Doncaster, our family again, continued to support the project. At that time, a group of residents organized a petition for those not in favor of the project. It was-unfortunate, in my opinion, that they city did not offer a survey at that time. I'm not sure if our experience was typical, but despite being very clear in our desire to support better connectivity community wide, we were visited by neighbors 3 different times in attempts to add our signature to the petition for those not in favor of the sidewalk proposal. I think it is a safe assumption that as neighbors, we all value positive relations within our community. These are emotionally charged issues and can be difficult to navigate. In my opinion, a city survey at that time would have been more benign, and I can't help but wonder if the outcome would have been more balanced. Moving forward, I would hope that our community members advocate for their wishes in a positive way by continuing to share ideas on this pages like this and write letters detailing specific experiences and opinions to our city council. I appreciate all the effort and thought that has gone into the city's living streets initiative and we will continue to support it moving forward regardless of our specific address. 1 Support Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... p V Nlark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... n V C Nleean Ulland at November 20, 2014 at 8:22am CST Reply to John Smith Reply to Liz Denn 11 MAIN11 d City of Edina Page 26 of 33 As a parent who has lived in many different cities across the US, I want to add my support for sidewalks throughout Edina. I recognize that our city grew up as a suburb, but now so many of our residents also work in Edina and are looking for different ways to commute to school and work. For us, it's critical to have safe sidewalks for our kids to walk along as they go to school just a few short blocks from our house. There are many kids from our neighborhood that walk. During the winter months, it is very dangerous for the kids to walk along the icy (and not well plowed) street. A sidewalk would be much safer as it removes the kids from the immediate vicinity of the moving cars. I applaud Edina for adding much - needed sidewalks to Arbour Ave along Countryside school's fields. However, it's critical that the sidewalks continue down through Arbour Lane and Jeff Place to the end of the neighborhood - either to connect to the already existing Tracy Ave sidewalks or to the already existing Bredesen Park sidewalks. Olinger was just repaved and sidewalks should have been added there - because to get to the Bredesen paths, especially in the winter, one must walk along Olinger for at least a block if you are approaching from 61 st or Sun Road. Please continue to make our kids safer and continue to support their ability to get to school by walking. 5 Supports Reply to Megan Ulland Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... V 101 doue hall at November 20, 2014 at 9:15am CST Reply to Megan Ulland We would like to see Todd Park area connected as much as possible within the city (perhaps extending that Vandervork piece down) and also St Louis Park AND how cool would it be to connect Todd Park park with a trail in to Meadowbrook (Minneapolis Park System) ? 0 Supports Reply to doug hall Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment.... A V ■ Andrew Toftev at November 20, 2014 at 9:31am CST Reply to doug hall Adding my voice in support of the sidewalk plans. I was not able to attend the public meetings, but I'm surprised the comments were so negative. The plan looks well - reasoned, and clearly there is a dearth of sidewalks throughout much of Edina As a father of 3, I don't want kids walking in the street 4 Supports Reply to Andrew Toftev Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... A V Reply to Andrew Toftey htt„•// ev, aalr�i„ a. linanrrr/r lieriiceinne /eirla�irallr_farilitivv_ mars /tnr�inc /fiifiira_eiela�xrallrc 11 /7A /')O1A City of Edina Page 27 of 33 Benjamin Tozer at November 20, 2014 at 9:38am CST Want to add my voice in support of the sidewalk plans. I wasn't able to attend the public meetings, but wanted to say that I'd love for the City to have.more sidewalks. As someone planning on raising a family in Edina, this would be very important. On a more specific note, could you explain the difference between the City Sidewalk and the State -Aid sidewalk? I live near 58th, and I really think it makes more sense as a City/Active Route to school sidewalk. It heads straight into the elementary schools west of Pamela park. It is an important road to connect Chowen park to the school system. 2 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Benjamin Tozer Support D • Delete Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin at November 20, 2014 at 10:03am CST A "Future State Aid Sidewalk" is a sidewalk that is proposed on a municipal state -aid (MSA) roadway. For these sidewalks, a majority of the funding would be paid for out of MSA funds, with any remaining costs coming from the PACS Fund. A "Future City Sidewalk" is a sidewalk on City streets that would be funded entirely by the PACS Fund. The "Future Active Routes to School" sidewalks are those that are recommended in the City's Active Routes to School Plan. This is not meant to imply that other future sidewalks (such as on W. 58th St) are not important connections to Edina's schools. 0 Supports Hide Replies Support Benjamin Tozer at November 20, 2014 at 11:45am CST Thanks, Mark. 0 Supports SSu port - -L A1ark Nolan, Transportation Planner ad min omment ... j i �7n, Mirk Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment ... 0 Reply to Mark Nolan Reply to Benjamin Tozer 1•�4iv<• / /nr�nnln�r�ndir�n nrn/ il�ominn�nnn/ nir�n�» nll�_ innt' l�+: no_ m�r� /trinino /firfiira_ci�asa�allrc .1,trml,)nIA City, of Edina Page 28 of 33 John Smith at November 20,2014 at 9:52am CST Jennifer J is your home on the proposed sidewalk addition map? How many trees are you losing? Is a sidewalk proposed to run in front of your home and directly through your yard between your yard and the next door neighbor? 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to John Smith Support Jennifer J at November 21, 2014 at 4:11pm CST My street doesn't meet the sidewalk criteria. If it did, I would welcome a sidewalk, even though six trees (three pines and three dogwoods planted long before we moved in) would have to be removed. 1 Support Reply to Jennifer J Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment... Reply to Jennifer J Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin :omment ... Reply to John Smith Lee Heckenlaible at November 20,2014 at 9:56am CST Unfortunately, this issue has been viewed by most as either "for" or "against" sidewalks. I think we can all agree that sidewalks obviously serve a purpose and are appreciated. Personally, I'm on board with almost all of the proposed sidewalks. Unfortunately, there are some that will significantly alter existing neighborhoods by: 1) changing the topography, 2) by removing significant trees 50 +years old that define neighborhoods, 3) eliminating landscaping on property and 4) practically eliminating some neighbors yards. These plans /sidewalks need to be looked at individually, not as an entirety. I would love to see most all of these sidewalks put in but just down the street from me is a perfect example of terrible planning and an absurd location. I'd be more than happy to show people pictures ... which is why.,my entire neighborhood is against this specific location. 1 Support Hide Replies Reply to Lee Heckenlaible SuppOrt 1 Benjamin Tozer at November 20, 2014 at 11:44am CST Good point, Lee. I need to take a closer look at the precise plans. Should do our best to keep trees. 0 Supports Reply to Benjamin Tozer Su on 11 MAI' 11 d City of Edina t, Mark Nolan, Transportation Planneradmin comment ... A V Mark Nolan, Transportation Planneradmin comment ... /p V Ben Pence at November 20, 2014 at 11:31am CST Reply to Benjamin Tozer Reply to Lee Heckenlaible Page 29 of 33 I also support the sidewalk plans, which if anything are very moderate. I am especially pleased to see the plans for West Edina- we're long overdue for having sidewalks on the full lengths of Blake Rd., Lincoln Dr. and Interlachen Blvd. 4 Supports Reply to Ben Pence Support Mark Nolan. Transportation Planneradmin comment ... A V Steven Krikava at November 20, 2014 at 12:24pm CST Reply to Ben Pence I strongly support the sidewalk plan. My wife and I have lived in Edina since 1987. Our first house was on Tracy and there was a sidewalk - very important to,the safety of our children as they walked to school. We've lived 18 years now on Malibu Dr. - no sidewalk. We are avid walkers year - round. I can't tell you how often we've felt endangered by drivers who come too close and/or drive too fast. Most of our daily walking route is slated for city sidewalks in the future. (I should live so long.) I look forward to the day when we can walk on a sidewalk, greeting neighbors and enjoying the fresh air and changing seasons without having to worry about our physical safety. 3 Supports Reply to Steven Krikava Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planneradmin comment ... A V Reply to Steven Krikava 1 1 /IA /101 A City of Edina l Page 30 of 33 Katie Stockwelk at November 20, 2014 at 1:42pm CST As a resident of the Edina Highlands neighborhood -I STRONGLY support the sidewalks proposed for our region. I truly think it only adds to our already beautiful neighborhood, will encourage .even more "community and most importantly provide a SAFE path to parks /school/ and public land where our neighborhood events are hosted. As a parent to two small children it is extremely frustrating trying to "wrangle" them. in when walking on the street: having to tie ropes to their trikes, or insisting they ride�M a stroller vs getting exercise. I also know that not having sidewalks is a big negative for some parents considering buying homes in our neighborhood. 5 Supports Reply.to Katie Stockwelk Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin Reply to Katie Stockwelk Qavle caslro at November 20, 2014 at 3:25pm CST I to very strongly support sidewalks in the Highlands neighborhood. Traffic, especially during summer soccer, fall football, fall frisbee golf is AWFULL around the park. There is no safe way for a child to get around the park and I think it's completely unreasonable to ask them to walk down the middle of the road. 6 Supports Reply to gayle castro Support Mark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin :omment... 5 Anna Sabiston at November 20, 2014 at 11:02pm CST Reply to gayle castro I•live in the Highlands neighborhood and believe the addition of sidewalks would be a net positive to our neighborhood. I have a small child and another on the way, and traffic can be heavy - especially evenings in the summer - with young teen drivers going far too fast given the number of young kids and walkers in the neighborhood. For a few homes that are close to the street, I hope we can work out a solution that would be less intrusive. Once my kids are old enough to walk to school, I would be delighted to have sidewalks for them to use. I second the ask for improved access between Vernon and garden park - the crossing is very unsafe. Finally, I encourage the city to think about vastly improving pedestrian / biker routes between west Edina and the 50th and France area. We have walked from our home to shops off Vernon and 100 as well as 50th and France, °but it is riot pedestrian friendly at all. -Where there are sidewalks the vegetation is often so overgrown that it is nearly impassable with a stroller. Further, you have to navigate through parking lots on the south side of Vernon to access any of the shopping centers. 2 Supports Reply to Anna Sabiston Support ht+r,• // rl' / rlionn�oinne /oiiln�sr�llr_fai�ili4iae_ man /tnrvireLfiifiira _ ciilauiallrc 11 /7d0 1A, or�nolr,mn tn� nrrt q.ct .g�a Qavle caslro at November 20, 2014 at 3:25pm CST I to very strongly support sidewalks in the Highlands neighborhood. Traffic, especially during summer soccer, fall football, fall frisbee golf is AWFULL around the park. There is no safe way for a child to get around the park and I think it's completely unreasonable to ask them to walk down the middle of the road. 6 Supports Reply to gayle castro Support Mark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin :omment... 5 Anna Sabiston at November 20, 2014 at 11:02pm CST Reply to gayle castro I•live in the Highlands neighborhood and believe the addition of sidewalks would be a net positive to our neighborhood. I have a small child and another on the way, and traffic can be heavy - especially evenings in the summer - with young teen drivers going far too fast given the number of young kids and walkers in the neighborhood. For a few homes that are close to the street, I hope we can work out a solution that would be less intrusive. Once my kids are old enough to walk to school, I would be delighted to have sidewalks for them to use. I second the ask for improved access between Vernon and garden park - the crossing is very unsafe. Finally, I encourage the city to think about vastly improving pedestrian / biker routes between west Edina and the 50th and France area. We have walked from our home to shops off Vernon and 100 as well as 50th and France, °but it is riot pedestrian friendly at all. -Where there are sidewalks the vegetation is often so overgrown that it is nearly impassable with a stroller. Further, you have to navigate through parking lots on the south side of Vernon to access any of the shopping centers. 2 Supports Reply to Anna Sabiston Support ht+r,• // rl' / rlionn�oinne /oiiln�sr�llr_fai�ili4iae_ man /tnrvireLfiifiira _ ciilauiallrc 11 /7d0 1A, or�nolr,mn tn� nrrt City of Edina Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment ... Reply to Anna Sabiston Page 31 of 33 Bill Melton at November2l, 2014 at 3:44pm CST I live in the Point of France condominium (6566 France Ave). Recently the new intersections and sidewalk along the east side of France from 66th southward were completed. I was frankly skeptical that these changes would make any difference. (Yes, I'm a crusty old economist....) However I've been pleasantly, surprised. Even mi chilly weather, which is what we have been having lately, I find myself leaving the car keys on the kitchen table and walking to Southdale, the Galleria, McCormick & Schmick, etc. I guess the sidewalk is like a "default option" on one's PC or phone. You use it unless you have a reason not to do so. Maybe a psychologist can figure this out. However I have found that in the few weeks it has been ready for use, that sidewalk has changed my walking time massively. I can well imagine that other Edinans would react the same way to new sidewalks near their homes. 2 Supports Reply. to:Bill Melton Support mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment . . i i Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin omment ... i Reply to Bill Melton Post Ideas In Action Bike Lanes Edina iust hired someone to renresent existing- residents who are dealing, with redevelopment issues—we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassment. Remove bushes on 42nd St. concealing Weber Par k Portable "Path Flooded" Sign at Bredesen Path Flooded Sign at Bredesen Park Recent Activity Bette Anderson created an Idea Dave Bender answered a Discussion Bill Strait voted on an Idea Bill Strait answered a Discussion MaFe Strait created an Idea 1 a ,) n i)ni n City of Edina City of Edina • Home Discussions • Forums Sigh Wa—S • Meetings • Surveys Email email dr s .. Passwoi password.., or, Sign Inol� -profile Connect • Sign In • Help Like r ®Sian Out Tweet Share $ +1 I ° 1 Page 1 of 7 e.a ZT Eciz�:� U� We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can maker' Edina an even better place for living,. learning, raising families and. doing: business. 1y Take a moment to provide you= feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or-start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina( ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ►. JOIN the discussion! Discussion: Sidewalk Facilities Map The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidewalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new map will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. There are four public meetings scheduled to gather input based on the City's four quadrants: 2 Topics 98 Answers Closes 2014 -11 -30 View Discussion 0 • Edit • Delete Topic: Criteria The City follows a set of criteria (View the staff report) to identify where sidewalks should go. What additional criteria should the City consider when looking at adding future sidewalks? 10 Responses 10 Responses David Frenkel about 1 month ago There is no mention in the criteria of mature trees near streets which can make it impractical to build sidewalks like Golf Terrace. There should be requirements to save mature trees. 1 1 MA /7(11 A City of Edina 2 Supports Reply to David Frenkel Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planneradmin comment ... A Reply to David Frenkel ■ Chris Bremer about 1 month ago Page 2 of 7 There could be a criterion related to access to public transportation. For example, sidewalks should be located to enable bus riders, including those with disabilities, to get safely to the nearest intersection/curb cut. Also, it would great to consider whether a sidewalk in a certain location would enable better pedestrian access from residential neighborhoods to retail establishments (in addition to parks and schools). 4 Supports Reply to Chris Bremer Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planneradmin comment ... q V Chris Bremer about 1 month ago Reply to Chris Bremer The sidewalk plan should also be coordinated with the county's bike infrastructure plan: http://xv%v%v.mpme%vs.org/story/2014/10/08/heiinepiii- county-bike-plan . 0 Supports Reply to Chris Bremer Support R1ark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... v Joel Steener, Community volunteer about 1 month ago Reply to Chris Bremer Neighborhoods with high population densities, lots of seniors and lower income people with limited budgets need sidewalks more than lower density, high income neighborhoods. Also, people who live within 4 -5 blocks of shopping facilities should be able to safely walk to the store. 2 Supports Reply to Joel Ste ner Suppor t 1- u.-' /1-----'-- -- -''--- - .._/1'------' -- -- - =�-- -- -��- r--'�-�--- /a- ._7.... �.. _]a...Y .. 11 hA InA1 A City of Edina ICI Mork Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... V V tonva wilhoit 28 days ago Reply to Joel Stegner Page 3 of 7 I do not see 59th Street on the side walk plan. This is the main street going into Concord Elementary from Wooddale. There are more than 20 children who walk on this very busy street to and from school each day. This street has a lot of traffic with the school as well - with parents, teachers and school buses rushing down this street, I'm sure driving faster than 30 mph. It also fits your criteria. 1. Routes to School, 2. It would prevent a history of accidents involving pedestrians (children!) walking along the roadway 3. a logical connection between destinations 4. Transit stops are present (on wooddale). PLEASE CONSIDER A SIDEWALK ON 59th STREET. This is also the intersection where cross walks are for Concord Children getting to school safely, crossing Concord on 59th. 1 Support Reply to tonya wilhoit Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... A d Chris Bremer 28 days ago Reply to tonya wilhoit I would like the city to consider whether a particular stretch of sidewalk is the best use of funds in a particular location. I am thinking about Strachauer Park and the planned north -south sidewalk along the west edge of the park. It would not be a bad thing to have a sidewalk there, necessarily, but that park desperately needs an upgraded park building that could serve functions beyond being a simple warming house. Our neighborhood has no community gathering spaces of any kind - no churches, no coffeeshops, no school, nothing. A larger park building would make a huge difference. If the money saved on a planned stretch of sidewalk there (which would lead to a freeway fence and be little -used) could instead be applied by the city towards upgrading the park building, that would be a much better use of city funds and would help our neighborhood a great deal. 2 Supports Reply to Chris Bremer Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment... A V 70 Reply to Chris Bremer City of Edina Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman 28 days ago Page 4 of 7 I strongly second adding a sidewalk on 59th Street between Wooddale Ave. and Concord Elementary. The residential neighborhood in this area is very dense and full of Concord children with 1) no bus service and 2) no safe walking route to school. Anyone who observes 59th Street during to "to" and "from" school time will immediately see the problem. 59th is THE STREET that walkers use to get to school - it is the main, and direct artery leading to Concord Elementary and the neighborhood funnels to this street as a sort of "safety in numbers" default. Countless families walk this route to and from school, and sadly, share the pavement with speeding cars and buses rushing to and from Concord, as 59th is also the direct route for vehicles between Wooddale and Concord. Making the pedestrian route worse, is all the overflow, on -street parking (on 59th) the completely bottlenecks 59th at our kids most vulnerable time. With no sidewalks, and cars parked on both sides of the street, we literally walk down the middle of the busy road, with the sunrise in the east making it hard for us to be seen, rushing buses, teachers, and parents. It's just a bad situation. A number of us have noted that a sidewalk looks planned for 60th street, which is fine, but 59th should be prioritized ahead of 60th. 59th is simply THE commuter artery for cars, buses, and most importantly, pedestrians. It needs help. A sidewalk would connect a densely populated neighborhood to 1) a public elementary school with no bus service in the neighborhood, 2) numerous public transportation stops, 3) sports fields, community centers, voter locations. etc. It simply screams "sidewalk ". Thank you! 0 Supports Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman Support 171 Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin comment ... A Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman Tom LaForce 17 days ago I commend the City on gathering public feedback on the plan. When sidewalks are proposed, it seems that the only people who provide feedback are those whose property abuts the sidewalk. Sidewalks serve more people than those who live next to them. Through this process it will be important to consider the feedback of all residents who may use the sidewalk, which can easily be more than a mile from a proposed sidewalk 4 Supports Reply to Tom LaForce Support Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin V11 Reply to Tom LaForce Paul walthour at November 17, 2014 at 8:52am CST Urban communities are in desperate need of more trees, grass and green space not more asphalt and concrete. This plan as indicated will destroy 50 foot tall white pines and 85 year old oak trees in our neighborhood, reduce green space and spend hundreds of thousands on a project that will have less than 1% utilization. Let's stop and think about this. 0 Supports Hide Replies Reply to Paul Walthour Support D 1 1 /')A MA A City of Edina Page 5 of 7 • Delete Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner ad min at November 17, 2014 at 10:16am CST Mr. Walthour: Thanks for your thoughts. One of the primary considerations when looking to install a sidewalk (including when deciding on which side of the street) are potential impacts. The City works with residents and does everything it can to avoid the removal of trees in our neighborhoods. We move the sidewalk (sometimes to the back of curb, other times behind trees or to the other side of the street), or at times have even moved a street several feet when reconstructing it to avoid the removal of mature trees. Thanks again for your input. 1 Support Support Mark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin comment... P Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner admin -omment... A IV Mark Nolan. Transportation Planner admin :comment... A b Ideas In Action Reply to Mark Nolan Reply to Paul Walthour Post Bike Lanes Edina just hired someone to represent existing residents who are dealing with redevelopment issues ... we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassment. Remove bushes on 42nd St. concealing Weber Park Portable "Path Flooded" Sign at Bredesen Path Flooded Sign at Bredesen Park Recent Activity Bette Anderson created an Idea Dave Bender answered a Discussion Bill Strait voted on an Idea Bill Strait answered a Discussion MaFe Strait created an Idea Participants 1 httn-NnnnininPrlina nrv/ rlicrllccinnc /ciriPwalk_far`ilitiPC_ man /tnnir.c /rritPria 11 /?A/?() 14 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 4:07 PM To: 'RFNelson'. Cc: Chad`Millner Subject: RE: West Shore Drive as Active Route to School Mr. Nelson, The sidewalk graphics (types and colors of lines) on the Recommendations Maps all indicate existing and proposed sidewalks, which originated from the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan and data that was provided to-the consultant. The Active Routes to School (ARTS) recommendations are indicated in white boxes, with leaders pointing to the recommended items. Please note that there is a label pointing to the West Shore Dr. 'sidewalk that states "Extend proposed sidewalk to 70th St. The France Avenue sidewalk does not have a label indicating,an ARTS recommendation. I spoke to the consultant who prepared this plan, who stated that indeed the West Shore sidewalk is recommended for implementation by this Plan. I would also like to clarify that sidewalks are labeled "Future Active Routes to School Sidewalk" on the Sidewalk Facilities Map to'indicate if they are recommended in the ARTS Plan. This is not meant to imply that a sidewalk has been "designated" as an "Active Route to School." You are correct in that the West Shore Dr. sidewalk is not listed in pages 29 and 30; however, it is indicated on the Recommendations Map and is considered a recommended sidewalk in the ARTS Plan. Thank you, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392. MNolan EdinaMN.gov_ I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning; Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: RFNelson [ mailto:rfnelson(@nelsoncpa.comj Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 3:52 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Re: West Shore Drive as Active Route to School Mr. Nolan, Thank you for your prompt reply. I looked at figure 10 but there is no label indicating what sidewalks are designated Active Route to School. The map shows sidewalks on the east side of France with the same designation as all other sidewalks. Is it possible that sidewalks on the east side of France are considered Active Routes to School? That does not seem logical. The recommendations around Cornelia School on pages 29 and 30 concerning sidewalks do not mention West Shore Drive or France. It°would be logical to conclude that the recommendations on pages 29 and 30 would describe the Active. Routes to School. Is there a document that specifically labels certain streets as Active Routes to School? 1 Russell Nelson On 11/4/2014 3:13 PM, -Mark K. Nolan wrote: > Mr. Nelson, • Thank you for your email. As I stated last night, a.sidewalk is • recommended -for West Shore Drive (south of 70th Street) -in the city's • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan. This plan was approved • unanimously by City Council in February and was prepared by a. • consultantwith input from Edina'staff, the Transportation Commission, • Edina`Public Schools, Bloomington Public Health and residents. For • more information and to download a PDF of the plan, please follow this > link: htfb: / /6dihamn.gov /active routes to school > > The sidewalk on West Shore Drivesouth of 70th St. is recommended and indicated on Figure 10: "Cornelia Elementary Recommendations Map" (page 46 in the PDF). > > Please note that all sidewalk recommendations in the Active Routes to School Plan, due to its focus on getting students to` and from school in a safe and healthy manner, have been incorporated into the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map. > Thanks again, > Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner > 952- 826 - 0322.1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 > MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov > ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: RFNelson fmailto:rfnelson @nelsoncpa.com] • Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 20142:52 PM • To:' Mark K. Nolan' • Subject: West Shore Drive as Active Route to School > Mr. Nolan, > Last night you indicated West Shore Drive south of 70th was an Active Route to School. Can you give me the document that states that fact? . > Thank you. > Russell Nelson > 7117 West Shore Drive > Edina, MN 55435 2 Mark K. Nolan , From- Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:14 AM To: 'Lynn Johnson' Subject: RE: Questions on Planned Sidewalk Ms. Johnson, Thank.you for your input. Please see my,responses to your questions below. -1. As it states in the report that accompanies the map, the Sidewalk Facilities Map does not indicate which side of the street that future sidewalks may be constructed on. This will be determined a year or two before installation .of the sidewalk, based on engineering studies and stakeholder, input. 2. Public Works staff does maintain sidewalks that are adjacent to schools and.that are on State Aid roadways; however ,.maintenance of this particular sidewalk, under current City policy, would be the responsibility of the residents. City staff is currently evaluating the potential costs involved in plowing more /all City streets, which would involve considerably more equipment and man power. 3. The Sidewalk Facilities Map — as part of the Comprehensive, Plan — is a map of what the sidewalk network could look like in 20 to 30 years. W. 60`h Street is not currently in the City's program for construction in the next five years, and the City has no current timeline for the installation of this sidewalk. Again; thanks for your response, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner . 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 r MNo1a6bEdina1V1N.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ' s For Living, I earning; Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lynn Johnson rmailto.ljmn6000(ayahoo -com] Sent: Monday, ,November 10, 20144:36 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Questions on Planned Sidewalk I have several questions: It looks like there is a plan to add a sidewalk running west to east on 60th street. (It is hard to tell because the streets do not seem to be labeled.) I live at 6000 Fairfax. 1) Will the sidewalk be,on the north or south side of 60th street? 2) Who will be responsible for maintaining the proposed sidewalk (e.g., keeping it free of snow and leaves)? and 3) How soon do you plan to put in the sidewalk? Lynn Johnson 3 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: i Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:19 AM To: 'kingstonm @comcast.net' Subject: RE: Sidewalk construction Ms. Kingston, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, 4Yh:.1. �,. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 = 826 -0322 I,Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNo60 dinaWgov l www.EdinaMN.gov :..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From:_ kingstonm(a)comcast.net [ mailio :kingstonrn(d)comcast. net ] Sent: Monday, November 10; 2014 5:44 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk. construction Hi, I live at 7774 Lochmere Terrace in Edina - just inside the city limits to the south. I have very strong feelings about priorities for sidewalks on 78th Street. My partner is a nurse at the VA Medical Center and rotates day and evening shifts. Their parking situation has been a problem while they are expanding. So I drive 78th Street in all seasons and weather - early in the morning and late at night as .I drop him off at work and pick him up. I see pedestrians walking east on 78th Street very late at night and walking in the street as there is no sidewalk here. It is a very dangerous situation for workers who appear to be cleaning staff at Express Scripts or other small, offices on the frontage road between 78th street and 494 Westbound. I - personally - have witnessed multiple close calls as cars barely miss the pedestrians who are walking in the street as there are no sidewalks. This is ESPECIALLY dangerous as they are crossing the bridge over the railroad tracks and need to walk in the street. The danger is exacerbated on Friday evenings when they, intersect with traffic to and from Sofitel, Radisson South, etc. I have no personal interest in the matter except that I live in continual dread about having to deal with dead pedestrians ohilie road at all hours of the night. Please add this concern to your list of preferences. Mary Jo Kingston ' 7774 Lochmere Terrace Edina;'MN 55439 952- 944 79022 4 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014'8:20 AM To: 'Allen, Martha' Subject: RE: Sidewalk - Abercrombie Drive Ms. Allen, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -03221 Fax 952- 826 -0392 rJ s MNolan(a)EdinaMN.-gov I www:EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Allen, Martha rmailto: Ma lien (abexcelsiorsolutions.com] Sent: Monday, November 10, 20.14 6:11 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk - Abercrombie Drive Hi Mark, I reviewed the sidewalk map and saw a red dotted. line in our neighborhood, which appears would put a sidewalk in our front yard if it is intended for the south side of Abercrombie Drive (we're at 5193 Abercrombie Dr): I generally support - this initiative: It,was about 15- yearsago, when my kids were young, when I started a neighborhood petition for sidewalks, stop signs, or anything to get the kids separated from the cars. I did a lot of research on sidewalks and really wanted to get one put in.. Although my petition /door to door mailing was informative and professional, I received . threatening feedback, and mostly all negative - from "I'm too old to shovel a sidewalk ", to "I'll be assessed and I'm on a limited budget ", etc. We now have a lot of young kids in the neighborhood again. I honestly can't believe their parents let them. play in. the street like they do,;but it frightens me. On several occasions, we've had to slam on our car brakes, as some little tyke comes shooting out onto Abercrombie on his tricycle. Mainly for the safety of the kids, I support a sidewalk. Keep in mind, if we do get the bike trail though (which I thought would be a good place for these kids to scoot around on) we'd have trails (sidewalks) in front of our homes, and bike path behind. Let me know.of you have any questions. Thanks, Martha Martha V. Allen 5193 Abercrombie Drive, Edina MN 55439 612 - 325 -7594 (cell) 3 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:23 AM To: 'Kathleen Pascale' Subject: RE: sidewalks Kathy, Thank you.foryour thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City. Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kathleen Pascale [ mailto :kathyandpeter @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 201411:34 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: sidewalks Hi Mark I wanted to email,you and let you know I am,strongly in favor of Edina getting more sidewalks. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood North of 70th. I run in the neighborhood year round, our family goes to the pool, the park and school often. I would feel, much safer with sidewalks while biking, running and walking. Often times I have to' jump onto the grass to get past cats because therei`sn't enough space for me to be on the street. This especially happens at ` intersections like' 66th and West Shore. While driving - around the neighborhood, I am careful to avoid the older people walking, the kids and families walking backfrom Cornelia and the people just trying to get \around to activities or getting some exercise. The 4th of July is packed with cars parked on both sides of the street. When we walk to see the fireworks, there's no place for us to.walk except in other peoples' yards. Sidewalks would provide more.space for getting around safely and just give peace of mind in knowing our chances are lessened for an accident. Thanks for considering. Kathy 6. 'Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:24 AM To:- 'Mike North' Subject: RE: Sidewalk feedback Mr. North, Thank you for your thoughtful. feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. .Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP; Transportation Planner x 952- 826 -0322 I Fax 952 - 826- 0392 U °1 MNolanra7 Edina MN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov . N ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Mike North [maiIto:m2north27 @gmail.com] Sent:. Tuesday, November 11, 2014 1:09 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: Sidewalk feedback Sorry, I sent the first email to the wrong address. Mike North From: Mike North <m2north27(a,gmail.com> Date: November ,11, 2014 at .1:06 PM 'fib: nmolangEdinaMN.gov Subject: Sidewalk feedback Hello! I live at 5.028 Valley View Road and I believe there should be a sidewalk on Valley View. We see a lot of people walking or biking on this street and it gets particularly busy when people attend events or services at Normandale Church. I believe it is noteworthy that many of the walkers and bikers are you rig children and Valley View is a fairly busy street: I would also point out-that on Sunday mornings cars park on both sides of Valley View and people are then forced to walk down the middle of Valley View to get to_ church. I see it is labeled on'the map as a future site. As you know Valley View is scheduled to be rebuilt next summer and it still makes sense to me: to do it then. Mike North 7 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:25 AM To: 'Tanya Dmowski' Cc: 'Michael Dmowski' Subject: RE: Sidewalks in our area Ms. Dmowski, Thank you for your feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan(g)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • •�,� ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Tanya Dmowski fmailtoJovitzaQ&comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 1:39 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: 'Michael Dmowski' Subject: Sidewalks in our area Hi Mark, I don't know whether I will be able to attend the meeting on November 191h, so I thought I'd weigh in via email. My husband Michael and I are highly in favor of the sidewalk plan shown in the Sidewalk Facility Map for our area. Best regards, Tanya Dmowski } Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2.014 8:26 AM To: 'deanne dubbs' Subject: RE: Opposition to sidewalks on Maddox Lane Ms. Dubbs, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, 0A1,,, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For. Living, Learning, Raising Families 6z. Doing Business From: deanne dubbs [mailto:deannedubbs @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday,. November 11, 2014 8:23 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Opposition to sidewalks on Maddox Lane In a survey of all residents living along Maddox Lane, taken on Oct 25th, 26th, 94% are opposed to a sidewalk on our street for various reasons. The criteria that the Transportation .Planner has put forth as pertaining -to, Maddox. Lane, were according to Mark Nolan at the Oct. 22nd Planning Commission Meeting, most likely measured on Valley View, a.section of the: roadway now dropped off the side walk plan by a previous vote of the city council. The 85th percentile speed of 38 miles per hours listed in the criteria matrix would be hard to achieve on Maddox Lane which has a sharp S -turn at one end and a stop sign 2 blocks later where it dead ends .at Hansen Road. If speeding were a problem, it should be addressed by law enforcement. Sidewalks have not been showni to slow down cars; rather cars slow, down when pedestrians are present. 94% of the residents living along our street feel safe when walking or biking on Maddox Lane. There have been no pedestrian accidents reported on Maddox Lane. At the very least, the transportation department should, conduct speed and traffic counts on the street in question when making their judgments. Although the Wyman bridge serves to provide car traffic the opportunity to cross Hwy 62 and, in doing so, allows access to Hwy 100 and various commercial 9 districts, very few destinations are close enough to Maddox Lane for pedestrians. It is a 3 mile round trip to the closest library, restaurant, grocery, drug or liquor store. Southdale is over 4 miles, there and back, and 50th and France is 6 miles. Within the Birchcrest Neighborhood, all destinations are north of Maddox Lane. If one wants to walk to Birchcrest Park, or to the Metro bus stop on Benton and Hwy 100, or the community center, one would hardly first walk south to Maddox Lane, only to then turn north to reach their destination. It doesn't make sense to put a side walk on a car route when pedestrians are inclined to take the most direct path. If the purpose of the walk is for pleasure, residents are able to choose streets with less car traffic. On Halloween.night I had 17 trick -or- treaters at my house. 6 of them were from Minneapolis, and 2 were children from next door. Only 9 were from the surrounding neighborhood. Obviously not a popular street at the southern edge of the neighborhood. There are costs to be considered. The sidewalk would be paid for by public money from utility fees that all Edina residents pay. Why not install sidewalks where the public feels they are needed and wanted? Since the driveways now allow for 4 cars, 2 cars wide and 2 cars deep, a 50% reduction would occur after sideways were installed and driveways would no longer be deep enough for a second row of 2 cars. There are 2 day care providers on Maddox Lane who would be faced with reduced off street parking for their client families especially during critical drop -off and pick -up times. Snow and ice removal will be another cost to residents whether they do it themselves or hire it done. I currently shovel a 629 square foot driveway. After adding the 5 foot wide side walk, to be placed near the edge of the yard where the snow plow deposits the street accumulation, that increases to shoveling 919 sq feet, a 46% increase. Residents are required to remove all snow and ice within 48 hours or else the city will clear the sidewalk and asses the cost to the property owners. And, should some one fall and be injured, I could be faced with expensive litigation. Almost all of the Maddox Lane residents were unaware of the Edina Sidewalks Facility Comprehensive Plan until our door to door survey conducted Oct 25 -26. A letter to the Birchcrest Neighborhood, from Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer, dated Sept. 8th, concerning roadway reconstruction, mentions that sidewalks are not 10 included with every project and that a future questionnaire will help evaluate the need for sidewalks. It was only by attending the Sept. 29th meeting at_the.Public Works Facility, and there seeing a poster of the proposed sidewalk map, that I realized clearly, sidewalk decisions had already been made. At the Oct. 221 Planning Commission Meeting.I was told that the community had been notified by social media, that you could find the information on the Edina internet website; and by an add in the Sun Current newspaper which is so small and brief that it would not arouse curiosity. J There seems to be a rush to implement this plan before citizens are made aware of it 'and more seriously, before citizens can have a voice in the neighborhood in which. they live. The 3 neighborhoods of Valley View, Golf Terrace and Indiariola/Jaunita have had the side walk plan, amended to exclude -them. , Maddox Lane now ,makes the, same request. It is a misuse of public funds to put a sidewalk on a seldom walked street which is not a direct route. for the few neighborhood destinations.., It would place an unnecessary burden- on the residents who clearly do not want it. The elected officials should question the validity of the criteria approved. by the planning commission and be sensitive to the-residents of the neighborhood who have lived on Maddok Lane and so, have intimate knowledge .of the foot, bike and car traffic on,their. street. It is against the will of the people and. will be a unwise and unpopular choice for the elected officials should they force the sidewalk on Maddox Lane. 11 Mark K.. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan . Sent: 'Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:32 AM To: 'Matt Glatzel' - Subject: RE: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Mr. Glatzel; Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. e Thanks again, of-wpl` Mark Nolan, AMP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 I.Fax 952 -826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN.gov ..For Living, Learning; Raising Families & Doing Business From: Matt Glatzel [mailto:mjonthemove @gmaii.com] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 4:06 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk.Map , Hi Mark, I currently live on the corner of 58th and Brookview Ave. Thank you for soliciting feedback on the Sidewalk plan. Speaking about the 58th avenue stretch from Wooddale to France Ave, I would greatly appreciate if the sidewalk were limited to one side of the street, and specifically that it continue to exist only on the North side of the street which is in line with the existing route in place from Southview Middle School to Wooddale Ave. The North frontage could easily accommodate this because many of those homes face 58th, whereas many of the homes along the South side of the street are oriented towards their respective side street. This difference in orientation results in the Southerly homes having less of a setback from the road, which doesn't-allow for the addition of a sidewalk. This further supports having the sidewalks oriented along the North side of 58th. Please let me know if you have any clarifying questions. Thank you, Matt Glatzel 5800 Brookview Ave. -=-- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: City of Edina, Engineering Department <mail e,edinamn.gov> Date: Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM Subject: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map. To: Matt <in 12 View this email in your browser Where should the pedestrian network for sidewalks be expanded? The City is looking for additional community input on its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates streets that currently have sidewalks and where sidewalks are planned to be added to the network over the next 20 to 30 years. Meetings will be held for each quadrant of the community, divided by Highways 100 and 62, to gather feedback on the plan. Anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The meetings are: • Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. • Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Those unable to attend the meeting are encouraged to review the Sidewalk Facilities Map and criteria and weigh in at www.SpeakUp_Edina.org, or submit written comments by email to mnolan�7a. EdinaMN.cjov, or to Edina Sidewalk Map, c/o Mark Nolan, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, 55424. 13 14 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:34 AM To: 'Robert Mayer' Subject: RE: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Mr. Mayer, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • a�r�,- ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Robert Mayer [mailto:rsm1627 @aol.com] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 4:28 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map If 20 to 30 years is the timeframe for adding sidewalks to • 78th Street where my wife and I traverse a great deal walking on the street into traffic and • Near the areas by the Public .Works building We don't consider this a reasonable timeframe. In addition, as a former member of the Human Rights and Relations Commission, I would be remiss if I didn't indicate that I have reservations about the map that you are using. It only indicates Churches in Edina. If houses of worship is a relevant consideration in placement of sidewalks (schools are OK in my view as a consideration), there are places of worship for other religions that should be noted on the map. If houses of worship are not a relevant consideration, they should be removed from the map. Thank you for your careful review of our concerns. Robert Mayer Jody Beresford 7436 Hyde Park Drive Edina, MN 55439 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: City of Edina, Engineering Department <mail(o)-edinamn.gov> To: Robert <rsm1627(5)aol.com> 15 Sent: Mon, Nov 10, 2014 3:25 pm Subject: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map View this email in your browser Where should the pedestrian network for sidewalks be expanded? The City is looking for additional community input on its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates streets that currently have sidewalks and where sidewalks are planned to be added to the network over the next 20 to 30 years. . Meetings will be held for each quadrant of the community, divided by Highways 100 and 62, to gather feedback on the plan. Anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The meetings are: Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. • Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Those unable to attend the meeting are encouraged to review the Sidewalk Facilities Map and criteria and weigh in at www.SpeakupEdina.org, or submit written comments by email to mnolan - EdinaMN.gov, or to Edina Sidewalk, Map, c/o Mark Nolan, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, 55424. 16 Facetook Twitter Email W(ebsite: .41n City of Ed ferences 17 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:35 AM To: 'Sarah Wuest' Subject: RE: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Ms. Wuest, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • s,. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Sarah Wuest [mailto:sarah.w @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:31 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map From a safety perspective, the most critical need is on Valley View Road between Gleason and 169. I have seen many close calls along that road, especially as it gets dark earlier and students are walking to school, many of whom wear no reflective clothing. There are also a lot of people who walk or run along that road who forget they cannot be seen in the dark and wear no reflective clothing. It is frightening to drive along that road, not knowing if people are walking along it or not. Sarah Wuest ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: City of Edina, Engineering Department <mailkedinamn.gov> Date: Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM Subject: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map To: Sarah <sarah.w(2gmail.com> View this email in your browser 18 Where should the pedestrian network for sidewalks be expanded? The City is looking for additional community input on its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates streets that currently have sidewalks and where sidewalks are planned to be added to the network over the next 20 to 30 years. Meetings will be held for each quadrant of the community, divided by Highways 100 and 62, to gather feedback on the plan. Anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The meetings are: • Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. • Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Those unable to attend the meeting are encouraged to review the Sidewalk Facilities Map and criteria and weigh in at www .SSpeakUpEdina.org1 or submit written comments by email to mnolan aEdinaMN.gov, or to Edina Sidewalk Map, c/o Mark Nolan, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, 55424. 19 1 I al , Facebook I � '•Y _ YI I _ � I - Twitter, ' : ''. r I t r I r1 Webslte You're receiving this email becE City of Edina. Our mailing address is: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Add us to your address book unsubscribe from this list upd � vrte(, 1rr- s-£,�i rj - .vii'i� ti's' \f b 20 Sarah Wuest, MBA sarah.wQ,amail.com ►12 -598 -1999 nttp:H,ww .linkedin.com/in/sarahwuest Twitter: @SaiiahWuest 21 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:43 -AM To: 'Kyle Jorgensen' Subject: RE: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Mr. Jorgensen, Thank you for your input. There is no separate timeline for the installation of the "Future Active Routes to School Sidewalks." However, generally staff does view these sidewalks as a higher priority when compared alongside other future sidewalks. Interlachen Blvd. is a State -Aid roadway, so this sidewalk (when installed) would be paid for with a combination of State -Aid and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Funds. Additionally, because it is recommended in a safe routes to school plan, other federal and state grants can also be pursued. The requirements of the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment only requires a sidewalk on one side of collector streets (Interlachen's functional classification is a collector street). The side of the street that the sidewalk would be constructed on would be determined a year or two before installation of the sidewalk, based on engineering studies and stakeholder input. Again, thanks for your response, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner ¢ x 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 -826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kyle Jorgensen [mailto :kylecjorgensen @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 3:44 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Hi Mark, Any idea on the timing as to when the active routes to schools sidewalks will be put in place? Also, is there state money that will assist in the cost of these sidewalks? I am really curious about the one slated to run along Interlachen BLVD. Will there be sidewalk on both sides of the street? Thanks! Kyle Jorgensen Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2014, at 3:25 PM, City of Edina, Engineering Department <mail edinamn.gov> wrote: 22 View this email in your browser Where should the pedestrian network for sidewalks be expanded? The City is looking for additional community input on its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates streets that currently have sidewalks and where sidewalks are planned to be added to the network over the next 20 to 30 years. Meetings will be held for each quadrant of the community, divided by Highways 100 and 62, to gather feedback on the plan. Anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The meetings are: • Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Those unable to attend the meeting are encouraged to review the Sidewalk Facilities Map and criteria and weigh in at www.SpeakUpEdina.org, or submit written comments by email to mnolan@EdinaMN.gov, or to Edina Sidewalk Map, c/o Mark Nolan, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, 55424. 23 24 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:30 PM To: 'Jennifer Christiaansen' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facilities Map: Community Comment Jennifer, Thank you for the heads up regarding the incorrect link. I have forwarded that on to our communications_ department.] have been getting quite a few emails, but they could be coming from several sources. Again, thank-you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered by staff and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Best, .Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner !n 95226 -0322 I Fax:952- 826 -0392 " -' MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families. & Doing Business From; Jennifer Christiaansen [ mailto: jennifer .christiaansen @uplusb.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:15 PM To Mark K. Nolan Subject: RE:. Sidewalk Facilities Map: Community Comment Sorry Mark, I just realized I sent you the non marked -up one. Not very helpful O .Here.you go! Jennifer` Christiaansen Assoc.'AIA I.LEEDO AP ` U +B architecture & design 2609 Aldrich Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408 612 870 2538 www.uplusb.corn From: Jennifer Christiaansen Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:54 PM To: 'Mark`K. Nolan' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facilities Map: Community Comment Here you go Mark! '(PS. I noticed the code was wrong on this page so when people click on your name they don't get the correct email address — even though it is spelled correctly on the webpage, the link transposed. the two first letters). Hopefully MJ will fix so you can get comments from the community. If this doesn't make sense and you need help fixing I can talk you all _through on the phone.) Kind Regards, 25 Jennifer Jennifer Christiaansen Assoc. AIA I LEED® AP U +B architecture & design 2609 Aldrich Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408 612 870 2538 www.uplusb.com From: Mark K. Nolan rmailto:M Nola n(abEdinaMN.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:50 PM To: Jennifer Christiaansen Cc: Jason Christiaansen Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facilities Map : Community Comment Jennifer, Thanks for your comments, and for taking the time to mark up the map. Can you please send me your markups? The attachment was lost along the email chain. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolanna.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ;r ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: MJ Lamon Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:43 PM To: 'Jennifer Christiaansen' Cc: Jason Christiaansen; Mark K. Nolan Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facilities Map : Community Comment Jennifer, it looks like you just transposed Mark's initials. I included him on this email so he has your comments. Thanks, MJ �vi�z,. MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator B "` 952 - 826 -0360 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0390 o, �y ,� MLamon(a�EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ''�-�.; ,--s ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jennifer Christiaansen rmailto:jennifer.christiaansenC ,@ uplusb.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:37 PM To: MJ Lamon Cc: Jason Christiaansen Subject: FW: Sidewalk Facilities Map : Community Comment MJ, The email below was bounced back to me. I'm not sure why as I used the email link to Mark on this page. Would you make sure that my comments are received by the appropriate staff at the city. Kind Regards, Jennifer Christiaansen Vice Chair of the Heritage Preservation Board 26 Jennifer Christiaansen Assoc. /W [ LEEDWO U +13 architecture & design 2609 Aldrich Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408 612 870 2538 www.uplusb.com From: Jennifer Christiaansen Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:34 PM To 'nmolan @EdinaMN.gov' Cc: 'mlamon @edinamn.gov'; Jason Christiaansen Subject: Sidewalk Facilities Map : Community Comment Mark, I've attached a marked up PDF of the sidewalk facility map. We live at 5300 W 64th street. have a few comments: 1. 1 fully support the addition of sidewalks in the areas I've bubbled. a. Along Ridgeview drive until it meets with the sidewalk along Valley Lane b. North and South along Warren Avenue from 63`d street to 66" street c. Along 66th street starting at Ridgeview Avenue until it meets with the sidewalk which begins at Josephine Ave at the Highway 100 bridge. 2. I've crossed out the sidewalk along the frontage road (63`d Street) along highway 100 as I don't think this is used regularly, and frankly it dead ends..lnstead what would be VERY helpful and make our community safer if a sidewalkcould be,added along 64th'street starting at Holborn Avenue and continuing until Josephine Ave. Then the sidewalk would continue down Josephine Avenue until it meets with existing sidewalk at 66th and Josephine. This path would allow the many children in our neighborhood a safe path to ride,bik6s and walk to the Edina, Pool in the summer as well as get over to the Lake Cornelia Park area. 64th street is very busy and although we, may have the option of Warren to 66th -- going up and down the hills of Warren and 6tth is quite hard for young children on bikes or families with Burleys or strollers. 3. 1 support the plans`to convert 9 mile creek to a regional trail. I look forward to hearing more about the plans. I cannot attend the meeting as I have a previous commitment, but if you have any questions about my comments I would be happy to discuss further. Kind Regards, Jennifer Christiaansen Vice Chair of the Heritage Preservation Board Jennifer Christiaansen Assoc. AIA I LEEDO AP U +B architecture & design 2609 Aldrich Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408 1612 870 2538 www.ui)lusb.com 27 Mark K. Nolan From: Jennifer Rewey <jen.rewey @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 8:11 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: Sidewalk Facility Map Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Completed From: Heather Wallace <jschuet@hotmail.com> Date: November 16, 2014 at 5:00:05 PM CST To: Jennifer Rewey <jen.rewegmail.com> Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map My understanding is that it will be one side, but i do not know which side, nor whether that is decided. I agree, not only would it take away, but i am concerned about the need to clear the snow. - -- Original Message - -- From: "Jennifer Rewey" <ien.rewey(a��mail.com> Sent: November 15, 2014 1:20 PM To: ninolan@EdinaMN.gov Cc: "Wallace Heather" <jschuet2hotmai1.com> Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map Hello, Could you please clarify if the sidewalk proposal- on 48th Street would be on both the north and south sides of 48th Street between Townes and France or just one side? Is that open for discussion? I am curious how the sidewalk would interface with the White Oaks Meadow and if that would interfere with the natural habitat and beauty of the preserve. Unfortunately, we are not able to attend the meeting on Wednesday but would like clarification so we can weigh in appropriately. Thank you, Jen and Steve Rewey 4012 West 48th Street Edina, MN 55424 e: jen.rewey(a?gmailxorn C: 952.356.5213 h: 952.926.2630 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:18 AM To: 'JoAnn Hillstrom'. . Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Ms. Hillstrom, Thank you for your feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, 1,0 ;,. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner c' 's 952- 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 - 0392 " MNolanCo?EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: JoAnn. Hillstrom rmailto:jahillst(a)yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November '14, 2014 4:15 PM To: Mark K. Nolan. Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map I am very happy to see that sidewalks are planned for 58th and 60th street between.Xerxes and France! JoAnn Hillstrom 2 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K: Nolan Sent: Monday, November, 17, 2014 8:25 AM To: 'kingstonm @comcast.net' Subject: RE: Sidewalk feedback Ms. Kingston, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with; other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Regarding the timeframe for sidewalk installation: please keep in, mind that there area lot of competing sidewalk projects/priorities from year to year, with limited funds.-Also, sidewalk projects can be implemented anywhere from next y ear to 20/30 years out, according to the proposed amendment` So you may not have to wait the entire 20/30 years for this sidewalk to get built, depending on budgets, need, etc. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • - m . -r ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: kincistonm (&comcast. net fmailto:kingstonm @ comcast. net ] Sent: Friday, November 14, 20145:35 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk feedback I love that you are going to put sidewalks on W 78th Street to connect the industrial/office areas between E and W Bush Lake Road, with -the bus route on E Bush Lake Rd. I am fearful every time I drive it at night in the winter. as the street is used by pedestrian building maintenance personnel who have no other place to walk after cleaning the buildings in the evening. When the snow. is coming down, they are very hard to see walking in the road and there is not consistent lighting on the whole route. My partner is a nurse at the VA who rotates.days and evenings and when the weather is bad, I will drive him and pick him up at when he works stormy evenings so I drive this route a lot. The sidewalk is sorely needed, especially on the bridge over the railroad track. HOWEVER I am appalled that it will be scheduled for sometime within the next 20 to 30 years!!! They could at least put a sidewalk on EITHER the north or south sidewalk of that bridge in the interim. may jo kingston 7774.Lochmere Terrace Edina, MN 55439 3 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:26 AM To': 'Carol Burmaster' Subject: RE: Sidewalk feedback Ms. Burmaster, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, 4ti+1:.1� Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner. c { ¢ 952 -826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolanCa?EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov 4yrtl 3 ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Carol Burmaster fm ailto:caburmaster @ gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:24 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk feedback Hi Mark: My name is Carol Burmaster -- I live at 6012 Birchcrest Drive. I am a senior who has lived 30+ years in my home. When my grandchildren were young I would take them to the park on. Tingdale -- it was always a challenge with three little boys because they would ride their trikes and scooters along the street The -cars on 60th go fast -- the street seems, to be wider than most residential- streets and it is a street that carries cars from other streets as they leave the area. Th neighborhood is changing and young families are moving in. During summer and fall, I see a parade of young families walking along the street to the park with cars going too fast on 60th. I am in favor of sidewalks. With the sidewalk on the frontage road along 100 I now walk to the library and Jerrys -- something i did not do previously: I hope the city can make walking safer for allpeople with the addition of more sidewalks. Carol Burmaster 4 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K: Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:12 AM. To: 'dan.n.root @gmail.com'. Subject: RE: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Da n, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included. other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, oczn1l", Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Pl anner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov 1 wvuw.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Prom 'dan.n.root @gmail.com [mailto:dan.n.root @gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:24 AM To:, Mark K. Nolan Subject: Fwd: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Hi Mark, I live .at 5140 Valley View Rd and would like to send you my opinion regarding sidewalks in my neighborhood. First off, I've heard there's a neighborhood group vehemently opposed to the sidewalks. I completely disagree with their position and desperately wish to see sidewalks around here. I've found that car traffic on Valley View blazes, through, and I don't feel safe walking on Valley View with that kind of traffic, especially when I'm with my newborn pushing his stroller. Also, as a runner, I often run along Hwy 100;.but the run along Valley View right by. Normandale Lutheran is especially dangerous as. there's very little time to jump off the street when a car zooms around the corner. So, I emphatically wish for the sidewalks to be built in the area. Please don't let the vocal "minority block what should be considered a public safety issue. Not that their position is invalid, I just find it lacking in sympathy for the rest of the neighborhood. Lastly, I'd like to encourage you to consider the sidewalks to be included in next year's road construction project that was delayed. Thanks for your consideration. 5 , Dan Root 5140 Valley View Rd Begin forwarded message: From: City of Edina, Engineering Department <mail@edinamn.gov> Date: November 10, 2014 at 3:25:05 PM CST To: Dan <dan.n.root@gmail.com> Subject: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Reply -To: City of Edina, Engineering Department <mail@edinamn.gov> • View this email in your browser CITY of EDINA. poor lrvi�><g, learzi4alg, ralesi�egfata�ilics �cdaing bt�si,riess Where should the pedestrian network for sidewalks be expanded? The City is looking for additional community input on its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates streets that currently have sidewalks and where sidewalks are _planned to be added to the network over the next 20 to 30 years. Meetings will be held for each quadrant of the community, divided by Highways 100 and 62, to gather feedback on the plan. Anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The meetings are: • Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 6 50th St. • Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Those unable to attend the meeting are encouraged to review the Sidewalk Facilities Map and criteria and weigh in at www.SpeakupEdina.org, or submit written comments by email to mnolan @EdinaMN.gov, or to Edina Sidewalk Map, c/o Mark Nolan, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, 55424. 0 0, G Facebook Twitter Email Website 1 Copyright © 2014 City of Edina, All rights reserved. You're receiving this email because you live in the City of Edina or have opted in to receive information from the City of Edina. Our mailing address is: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. . Edina, MN 55424 Add us to your address book unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences 7 Mark K. Nolan r From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:13 AM To: 'Dennis Fernkes' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Dennis, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback regarding sidewalks on West Shore Dr.'Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report.. Thanks again, Mark - Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN:gov www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing' Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Dennis Fernkes [mailto:fern7313 @scc.net] Sent: Saturday,.November 15, 201411:04 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map. :Dear Mark, I reside on West Shore Drive, south of W 70th Street. I am writing to voice my opinion on the sidewalk proposed for this street. I have lived here for over 25 years and on multiple occasions, too many to count, I have watched, walkers, both young and old, strolling or jogging along this street. I truly believe that they'enjoy using the street to walk: Where l live, it is all concrete. The road is wide and does not have a lot'of parked cars on it. Many of these people walk dogs that like to stop and sniff or meander around. Others are with their young children who are just learning to bike. Still others are family groups that like to „be close together. I have never seen cars or trucks endangering these people. In fact, it causes them to slow down and pay, more attention to their driving. honestly believe, that even with a sidewalk, they will choose to walk in the street. I have seen joggers on streets that do have sidewalks, but they still jog in the street in violation of the City Code. So please take note of my opposition to putting in sidewalks on this street. . Thank you, Dennis. Fernkes 7313 W.Shore Dr - Sent.from my iPad. 8 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:36 AM To: 'Jennifer Rewey' Cc: Wallace' Heather Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Mr. and Mrs. Rewey, Thank you for your question. W. 48th Street is currently proposed,to:have a future sidewalk on one, side of the street. Based on the criteria set in.:the proposed amendment, the only roads that are `:- required" to.have current /future sidewalks on both sides of the street are "minor arterials" — streets like France Ave, 50th St, etc. The side of the street has not yet been determined. This decision will be made a year or so before a sidewalk is scheduled for construction, when an engineering study (which takes into;account.impacts such as trees, slopes, etc.) is prepared. W. 48th Street is not currently scheduled for reconstruction in the next 5 years. Thanks again, 4tJY..1,. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 - 0322 1, Fax 952- 826 -0392 �.. MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6t. Doing Business From: Jennifer Rewey [mailto:jen.rewey @ gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 15i 2014 1:21 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: Wallace Heather Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map Hello, Could you please clarify if the sidewalk proposal on 48th Street would be on both the north and south sides of 48th Street between Townes and France or just one side? Is that. open for discussion? I am curious how the sidewalk would interface with the White Oaks Meadow and if that would interfere with the natural habitat and beauty of the preserve. Unfortunately, we are not able to attend the meeting on Wednesday but would like clarification so we can weigh in appropriately. Thank you, Jen and Steve Rewey 4012 West Oth Street Edina, MN 55424 e: jen.rewey(d?gmail.com c: 952.356.5213 h: 952.926.2630 9 Mark .K.,:NQ n, From:, Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:45.AM To: 'Maureen Menden' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Ms. Meriden, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback regarding sidewalks at W. 66th St. and Southdale Rd. Your:input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 - 0392„ MNolan @EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message - - -- From: Maureen Meriden [mailto:mmmenden @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 7:04 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk'Facility Map We havealways felt the there needs to be a sidewalk that wraps around the entrance from West 66th to. Southdale Road. When the medians a few years ago, there was not enough room for both a car to get through and a pedestrian or biker. We strongly recommend that the sidewalk on 66th street wrap around past the median so drivers don't need to stop for walkers and /or bikers to get through or walkers don't need to move to the grass so a car can.get through. Thank you 10 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:53 AM To: 'ehr309 @clear.net' Subject: RE: sidewalk map Mr. Ehrich, Thank youfor your feedback on the sidewalk plan. I am assuming you are referring to the green dashed line,on the map. That indicates the future alignment ofthe.Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, which will utilize the existing pedestrian trail j, currently in: place, so you are. correct in that no new sidewalk is proposed..to be constructed there. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.>ov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: William Ehrich [mailto:ehr309 @clear.net] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2.014 8:10 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: sidewalk map The bit going east from Gallagher and France isn't needed. There already is a good pedestrian path. -- William Ehrich 1300 Gallagher ' it Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:56 AM To: 'MARLYS GRANTWIT' Subject: RE: Sidewalks J Ms. Grantwit,' Thank you for your feedback regarding sidewalks in the Southeast part of Edina. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, �+ar,. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Y 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952- 826 -0392 y� :fir, d MNolan'QEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • r;> ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: MARLYS GRANTWIT [mailto:marlysgrantwit @ msn.com] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 1:12 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalks live in the SE quadrant: I am unable to attend the 11/19 meeting due to our Condo Association Meeting. It is the first meeting after our Annual Meeting at which several issues were discussed and still need resolution. J' I have always lived in areas with sidewalks and am used to having them for walking: The SE quadrant has r sidewalks so I do not believe that they are a factor for our area. Marlys GRANTWIT 7220 York Ave So Apt 221 Edina 55435 ,www.marlvsgrantwit @msn.com Sent from Windows Mail 12 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17,2014 10:00 AM To: 'Robert McKlveen' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Mr. McKlveen, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback regarding sidewalk on Ayrshire Blvd. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Robert McKlveen [mailto:bobmcklveen @mac.com] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 2:08 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map Dear Mr. Nolan, am writing to voice my support for the overall Sidewalk Facility Map in general, and to support the sidewalk along Ayrshire Blvd in the Highlands neighborhood in particular. I would like to see even more sidewalks added to the overall plan in future years, as well. I see the benefits of a sidewalk on Ayrshire in three broad areas: -- Safety -- Ayrshire is a busy street, and during busy times exceeds the hourly traffic count thresholds recommended by national safety standards to separate pedestrians from cars by having a sidewalk. Many children walk on Ayrshire to get to or from school during these peak traffic times. -- Health -- Numerous national and local health organizations, such as Blue Cross /Blue Shield of MN, promote increased walking as one step to improving health and fitness, and they encourage municipalities to build or rebuild their infrastructure to make walking safer and more accessible. -- Livability and Property Value -- Web -based ratings of neighborhoods include points for the accessibility to shops and services by walking or biking in their evaluations of livability. We get points off because of our lack of sidewalks. Several years ago, as the City was planning for renovation of street and utility facilities for the Highlands neighborhood, a group of residents presented an alternate plan to the City and circulated a petition asking the City to install their alternate plan. They were able to get a majority of the neighborhood to sign the petition, even though several statements in the petition were not supported by the facts of the City's plan. The City's plan included a sidewalk along Ayrshire and, while that part of the plan actually had significant support among the neighborhood, there were other features to the City's plan that some residents objected to. In fact, if the City had performed the renovation as originally proposed by the City engineers, our neighborhood would have a sidewalk on Ayrshire, better lighting, all new curb and gutter, less asphalt, more green space, and it would have cost each homeowner $2300 less, according to the engineers at the time. Ah well... 13 I tell you this to clarify that, while some residents may indicate that the neighborhood signed a petition opposing a sidewalk, that petition.actuallyspoke to a -broad number of issues, only one of which was sidewalks. Since that petition was presented to the City, there'Ns,been substantial'turnover'of residents in the neighborhood, and a change of heart "about sidewalks among many remaining residents from that time. If you were to formally survey the neighborhood today, I am confident that you would find majority support for a sidewalk on Ayrshire. Thank you for your work on the issue of pedestrian safety, and on the livability of Edina infrastructure in general. Please feel free to call or write.if you have questions. Best regards Bob McKlveen 5261 Lochloy Drive Edina, MN 55436 952 - 270 -8001 14 Mark K. Nolan From Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17,2 014 10:014 AM To: .'WinnieandSteve Martin'. Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility.Map Winne, Thank you for your thoughtful suggestions regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again; Mark.Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952'- 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaWgov I www.EdinaMN.gov 3 ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: WinnieandSteve Martin [mailto:martins6012 @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:22 AM To:.Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map Mark, I won't be able to attend my slotted resident feedback_session, but I wanted to email you directly and let you ,know that anything our city can do to improve access to /from schools from our main throroughfare's (France to 58th to Concord Ave.) would,greatly improve the safety of our kids. There are many that are "leery" of this plan only b/c there is a gross misunderstanding of what this plan entails. Neighbors that I have spoken•with don't necessarily want sidewalks all over every street, but all that I have spoken with and shown the 200.8 plan (I would recommend you update the date,, ie 2008 - revised 2014) have been a proponent of most all of your recommendations. It is important to let the community know that this plan DOES NOT include a sidewalk on every block, in every neighborhood. It only includes clearly. identified Active Routes and Safety Corridors as defined by a number of criteria. I greatly support the city plan and would encourage those that don't currently support truly take the time to travel on these corridors as they exist today. As we look at the next generation of our school system I commend the city on,doing the same to match the changing/moving trends in transportation and active routes. Thanks, - Winnie Martin 6012 Ewing Ave. South Edina, MN 55410 m artin s6012 Q, Rmai l . com 15 Mark K. Nolan From: Carol Burmaster <ca_burmaster @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 17, 201410:29 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Re: Sidewalk feedback Thank you Mark. Yesterday,I mentioned to a neighbor that I am in favor of sidewalks for the young families currently in the neighborhood and the new ones coming in -- and I experienced an intense blowback including the• "f' word severalAimes. The individual is Lisa Burroughs who has been a vocal presence at the meetings -- I- have great compassion for people trying to do the right thing who encounter such wrath. My hope is for a safer and more walkable neighborhood -- that families and young children can safely walk to the two parks close and not be. at risk walking on a wide street with cars going too fast. Good luck. Carol Burmaster On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Mark K. Nolan <MNolanedinamn.gov> wrote: Ms. Burmaster, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. Your input will be considered and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again,.. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952- 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Carol Burmaster [mailto:caburmaster(a cimail.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:24 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk feedback 16 Hi Mark: " My name is Carol Burmaster -- I live at 6012 Birchcrest Drive. I am -a senior who has lived 30+ years in my home. When my grandchildren were young I would take them to the park on Tingdale == it was always a challenge with three little boys because they would ride their trikes and scooters along the street The, cars on 60th go fast -- the street seems to be wider than most residential streets and it is a street that carries cars from other streets as they leave the area. Th neighborhood is changing and young families are moving in. During summer and fall, I see'a parade of young families walking along the street to.the park with cars going too fast on 60th. I am in favor of sidewalks. With the sidewalk on the frontage road along 100 I now walk to the'library and Jerrys '-- something i did not do previously.- _ J I hope the city can make walking safer for allpeople with the addition of more sidewalks. CarolBurmaster 17 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17,2014 12:47 PM To: 'Marge Fischer' Cc: Patrick Wrase Subject: RE: Sidewalks Ms. Fischer, Thanks for your email. The sidewalk indicated on the Sidewalk Facilities Map „on Sun Rd is recommended by.the City's approved Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan, which looks to give children and their families the opportunity to walk to school safely. Additionally, the sidewalk you are discussing (due to this recommendation) is currently part of the 2015 Countryside H reconstruction project, and is recommended for the north side of Sun Rd (which I understand is on your side of the street). You should have received information about this project, as well as invitation to an Open House conducted this past July 28, when these sidewalks were shown and discussed. A public hearing is scheduled for this project on December 9, which will result in a City Council vote on the proposed improvements — you can testify at this meeting if you wish. If you have any questions about the 2015 reconstruction project, please contact Assistant City Engineer Pat Wrase (pwrase @edinamn.gov, 952 - 826 - 0443). To address your more specific questions: City staff works with residents on any necessary relocation of underground sprinkler systems and the City pays for costs associated with removal /relocation. It does look as though some tree trimming may be necessary at the corner you refer to, but at this time staff anticipates no necessary removal of mature trees. Also, Public Works crews will be plowing the sidewalk (if installed), given that it serves as direct access to Countryside School walkways. Regarding funding: sidewalks are not assessed to residents and are paid for out of the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund:(http: //edinamn.gov /pats fund), which cannot be used for costs that are not directly associated with pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Thanks again for your comment, xcu:.t. Marx Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 I Fax 952- 826 -0392 .. MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov '• ¢,r� <�>s ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Marge Fischer [ mailto:Marge.Fischer @heart.org] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:26 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalks My husband and I will not be able to attend the sidewalk meeting this evening. We definitely do not want /need a sidewalk. We have an underground sprinkling system which would be very costly to remove /change plus large trees on the corner of our lot on Sun Road and Amy Drive. Who shovels this walk once it is installed ?? Also we have utility units bordering our property. The money would be better spent repairing the remainder of Tracy Avenue and other Edina streets. Margaret and Jerry Fischer, 5805 Amy Drive, Edina, MN. Phone: 952 - 935 -9470. Marge Fischelr Administrative Associate, Communications is Midwest Affiliate 4701, W 77th Street I Minneapolis, MN 55435 Marge.fischer(aD-heart.org I www.heart.orq P 952.278.7909 www.heart.or-q/IifeIswh y my family is why pArnerlcan � American Heart I Stroke Association Association e life is why- 19 Mark K. Nolan From: Sarah F Zarrin <sarah.f.zarrin @seagate.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:12 AM Tm Mark K. Nolan Subject: Re: EEC commissioner, input for sidewalk 78th and East bush lake area for tonight's meeting Thanks and very much appreciate your effort on this important matter for our city. Regards, Sarah Zarrin Seagate Technology (952) 402 8719 On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Mark K. Nolan <MNolan@edinamn.gov> wrote: Sarah, I am glad I had a chance to meet /present to the EEC last week. Thank you for your thoughtful suggestions regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map. in the southwest quadrant of the City. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan,.AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 -826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Sarah F Zarrin [ mailto :sarah.f.zarrin(�bseagate.coml Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 2:11 PM To: Mark K..Nolan Subject: EEC commissioner, input for sidewalk 78th and East bush lake area for tonight's meeting 20 Hi Mark, Thanks,for coming to the EEC meeting on 11 /11. And thanks for all the efforts to make Edina more.. accessible to all kinds of transportation. I have ar conflict to come to the sidewalk meeting tonight for the SW area. Could you please consider the following input for the tonight's meeting. 78th and East bush lake cross section, towards gleason does not have side walk.closer to the bridge. The, neighborhood uses 78th to walk/bike to the Bush lake park area. East.Bush lake road, Bloomington side has very good bike and walking/running sidewalk. The section in Edina makes it very concerning for walking and/or bicycling. This is my way going and coming back from home to work. I have noticed that there are many people, employees of the commercial bldgs, walking from this area to the other side of the 78th/industrial blvd to catch bus or ... I also, noticed, the bridge was repaired this year, and was hoping for addition of side walk, but to our amazement no change, just surface finished was repaired. Please consider adding complete sidewalk to this busy road. Sarah zarrin 7609 Stonewood CT Edina Mn 55439 21 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 18; 2014 8:27 AM. To: ' Hamid Mohtadi' Subject: RE: Southwest Edina sidewalk and other issues Hamid, Thank you for your thoughtful suggestions regarding sidewalk facilities in the southwest quadrant of the City. This input (along with the two other points you make) will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Hamid Mohtadi [mailto:mohta001 @umn.edu] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 2:36 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Southwest Edina sidewalk and other issues Dear Mark: I am a resident of Southwest; Edina (7609 Stonewood Court, Edina MN 554 39) and would like the opportunity afforded by the meeting this evening to bring up several issues that speak to the neglect'of this area from various. projects. 1. There is no sidewalk starting from the corner of 78 and East Bush Lake heading both Eastward (towards the 'Shell . Station). 2. The area of Stonewood Court has not benefited from a new asphalt cover, let alone new asphalt. The most that the street has been seen over the past several years has been a cold asphalet as a. "band -aid" solution to the various potholes that we suffer from. 3. The area has experienced a dramatic rise in highway noise since the expansion of HWY 169. Prior..to that, we enjoyed greater piece and tranquility. No effort has been made to provide various sonic technologies to address this new problem. Sincerely, Hamid Mohtadi, Professor Dept of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota 612 - 625- 8241(w), 952 - 903 -5224 (h) 22 Mark K. Nolan l ' From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:31 AM . To: 'lauren s' Subject:. RE: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Lauren, Thank you for your input regarding the:Sidewalk Facilities Map: and W. 62 ". Street. As you may have seen, the Map does indicate a .futuresidewalk of this location, which if implemented would ,most likely occur during the reconstruction of 62 "d St (which is anticipated,to be reconstructed in 2018). This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner:: 952- 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolari @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: - lauren s [ mailto: lucky. lorenita @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 4:13 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Re: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map Hello, I would like to submit a suggestion to assess W 62nd Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road. This stretch of road has a moderate level of foot traffic, including children and Metro Transit riders going to /from bus stops. Cars tend to travel at' faster speeds along this on this road and incline of the street when driving West limits visibility of pedetrians on the road ahead before'the car reaches the top of the incline.. The road is quite rough as well, which causes drivers to swirve to avoid uneven surfaces, which can be especially dangerous. for pedestrians who are walking on the side of the road if they are unseen. There has also a steady stream of watr present•at times, in the middle of the road on the south side, which may. originate from a residential sump pump, but which creates standing water and ice which inhibits pedestrians walking along the side �ofrthe road. Thank you for your consideration, Lauren :... =--- - - - - -- Forwarded message-7 ------- From:, I City of Edina, Engineering Department <mailnedinamn.gov> Date: Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM Subject: City Seeks Feedback On Sidewalk Map To: Lauren <lucky.lorenita@gmail.com> 23 View this email in your browser `1eY'I'Y:of EDIN. 9.9 - ,,, t'ar 11,011g, learnitlg, raEsing families : doiog business Where should the pedestrian network for sidewalks be expanded? The City is looking for additional community input on its Sidewalk Facility Map, which indicates streets that currently have sidewalks and where sidewalks are planned to be added to the network over.the next 20 to 30 years. Meetings will be held for each quadrant of the community, divided by Highways 100 and 62, to gather feedback on the plan. Anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The meetings are: • Northwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard Those unable to attend the meeting are encouraged to review the Sidewalk Facilities Map and criteria and weigh in at www.SpeakUI)Edina.org, or submit written comments by email to rnnolan aEdinaMN.gov, or to Edina Sidewalk Map, c/o Mark Nolan, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, 55424. 24 IN I - Nebsite .. $q. y, r IYN Copyright © 2014 City of Edina, All rights reserved. You're receiving this email because you live in the City of Edina or have opted in to receive information from the City of Edina. Our mailing address is: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN55424 Add us to your address book unsubscribe from this listupdate subscription preferences s V 25 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:33 AM To: 'Gretchen Doom' Subject: RE: Sidewalks in Edina Highlands Neighborhood Gretchen, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the northwest quadrant of the City, and in the Highlands Neighborhood in particular. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gretchen Doom [ mailto :gretchenhass @hotmail.com) Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 4:51 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalks in Edina Highlands Neighborhood Dear Mark, My husband Jeff and I are residents of the Edina Highlands neighborhood. We live on Lochloy Drive and have been walking (and sometimes driving) our two older children to Highlands Elementary since September 2007. We also have a preschool aged child and anticipate many years ahead walking to school. I understand that proposals to add sidewalks to portions of Edina Highlands neighborhood are up for consideration for future city planning and that they will be part of the agenda for the Edina City Council meeting tonight 11/17/14. My husband and I are in favor of improving safety and the walking routes to school in our neighborhood. The suggested implementation of sidewalks may need some rethinking as many neighbors in our area strongly oppose them. I'm afraid many Highlands neighborhood residents are unaware of the amount of traffic our children must navigate along Ayrshire just south of Lochloy Drive at the favored "cut through" site to Highlands Elementary. That being said the goal is worth pursuing. Our oldest daughter was nearly hit by a car on Ayrshire during our morning walk to school a few years ago. The street was extremely busy with cars and Edina school buses passing by from both directions during that harrowing moment. After contacting both the Highlands Principal and the Edina schools transportation department to report the incident, not much was done (or could be done according to those with whom I spoke) to improve the safety of that area without involving the Edina City Council. I know several neighborhood families who make a conscious effort to walk their children to and from Highlands Elementary school daily because of this traffic safety concern. Please consider us as supporters of sidewalks in the Edina Highlands neighborhood. Sincerely, 26 Gretchen & Jeff Doom Sent from my Whone 27 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:37 AM To: 'Amy Olson' Subject: RE: Support for the comprehensive plan Ms. Olson, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the southeast quadrant of the City. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks.again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner c B `• °` 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952- 826 -0392 s MNolan@EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ww ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Amy Olson [mailto:apampusch @gmaii.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 5:53 -PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Support for the comprehensive plan Nov. 17, 2014 Dear Mr. Nolan, I am writing in support of the city's comprehensive plan creating safer routes through neighborhoods via sidewalks. My husband and I moved here 10 years ago from St. Paul, and have a 9- year -old son attending Cornelia Elementary. We chose our specific location because it is within "walking" distance to entertainment and dining. However, we rarely walk to nearby Galleria, to the AMC theater, or even to get coffee at Caribou because it is simply too dangerous. On several occasions while walking down Cornelia I have nearly been hit by a passing vehicle. If there are cars or service vehicles parked in the street and I am forced to walk around them, cars can barely get by me. One of 28 us needs to stop until the other passes by. It is impossible to walk more than two abreast, which makes it very unsafe when walking with my son and friends to the pool, to school - or anywhere else. It is much worse in the winter. The streets, piled with snow, are narrower, and there is no place to move if a car poses a danger to a pedestrian. What's more, I know sidewalks would add value to our home and neighborhood and will one day make our house more saleable: I know that if we ever choose to -move again, a neighborhood with sidewalks would be a top priority. Thanks for your attention, Amy Nmpusch Olson 6808 Cornelia Drive Edina 29 Mark K.'Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:58 AM• To: 'lisa illig' Subject: RE: northeast sidewalks Ms. Illig, Thank you for your thoughtful feedback regarding sidewalk facilities in Edina. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2-City Council packet /report. Thanks again, !rf�. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner c @ s 952- 826 -0322 I Fax 952- 826 -0392 e MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • •.W,.. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: lisa illig [mailto:lcillig @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:53 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: northeast sidewalks Dear Edina, I am unable to attend the meeting, but wish to. express my support for more sidewalks in Edina. I have seen the benefit -of the new sidewalk that was placed last year on School Road near Concord Elementary. My child can now walk safely home from school whereas before, it was unsafe with cars and buses and snowbanks competing for road space. Ipreviously drove her to and from school despite the short distance as there was, no safe place to walk. I see children playing and:biking on the new sidewalk, runners. running on it, neighbors taking more walks, more, children walking to and from school - it is getting wonderful use. Hive on 60th St and would be delighted to see a sidewalk going to Pamela Park. I would be happy to lose some of my front yard to this sidewalk. This sidewalk would allow my family and others the ability to safely get to Pamela Park as well as to some of our favorite walking destinations - Snuffys and the Neighborhood Ice Cream Shopper In addition, my, street seems to be a cut through for cars avoiding Valley View Road. Traffic can be heavy (and fast) during rush hour and before and after school. A sidewalk would be wonderful during these busy traffic times and would make my busy street safer for all of us. Lastly, as a physician, I support sidewalks as a way to increase walking, running and biking for my neighbors of all ages. I support more sidewalks all over Edina to increase safety as well as promote healthy activities and welcome one in my own front yard. Sincerely, Lisa Illig 4820 W 60th St Edina, MN 30 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November. 18, 2014 10:17 AM To:. 'Sarah "Sal" or Tom Hussian' Subject: RE: Highland Sidewalk input Mr. & Mrs. Hussian, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding.the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the northwest quadrant of the City, and'. in the Highlands Neighborhood in particular. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952=826 -03221 Fax 952 -826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov '' ,� •- ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Sarah "Sal" or Tom Hussian [mailto:hussianth @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:59 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Highland Sidewalk input Mr. Nolan, This email is in regards to the proposed sidewalks in our Highland area. I wanted to convey that our family is in support of sidewalks in our neighborhood. We -live on Doncaster Way. We support.it for reasons around safety and health. I am aware many of our Highland neighbors are not in favor of the sidewalks. We have had a lot of housing turn over in Highlands, with young families(children) moving in. Lam hoping these new families will be in favor of the sidewalks. Please don't rule out future sidewalk plans. No reply is necessary. Thank you! The. Sal and Tom Hussian Family 5213 Doncaster Way Edina, MN. 55405 31 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 201410:37 AM To: 'Jon Moon' Subject: RE: Sidewalks and crossings Jon, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map, criteria and maintenance of sidewalks. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jon Moon [mailto:tawarayama @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:23 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalks and crossings Mark, Thanks for the opportunity to contribute to sidewalk planning in Edina. I'm sure others have weighed in on details of routes. My requests are: 1. There should be a sidewalk wherever there is a .Metro bus stop. And wherever school buses stop on through streets or streets with a speed limit above 30 mi /h. People entering and exiting buses must have a refuge from traffic. Some areas are so narrow that there is little room to disembark. A key example is W 78th St between Cahill and Bush Lake Rd. In this location it's also marked illegal to cross any street in any direction from the bus stop. Other places the snow is piled so high that transit users must stand in the street and hope they don't slip under the bus. 2. Make sure a path from the sidewalk to the street is cleared wherever any bus stops. 3. Make sure that sidewalks are not blocked by refuse containers. Homeowners should be cited if they don't keep them on their property. Especially in winter, containers make sidewalks impassable for the handicapped or those pushing strollers. 4. Provide crosswalks or traffic controls on streets wherever there is a public facility. Examples along Vernon include at Hansen Rd (entrance to Garden Park and obvious route to Countryside School) and at Schaefer Rd (NW entrance to Bredesen Park - heavily used and marked with a park sign). 5. Obstacles on sidewalk should be removed. Where this is impossible they should have permanent warning illumination. See, for example, the dangerous control box on the north sidewalk of the 50th street bridge over Hwy 100. Please call or write me if you have any questions. Best regards, Jon Moon 6016 Schaefer Rd 952.373.1636 tawarayama @gmail.com 32 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 19,2014 10:04 AM To: 'Amanda Simons' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Ms. Simons, Thank you for your thoughtful questions and comments regarding sidewalks in the northwest quadrant of the City. Edina residents are no longer assessed for sidewalks. Those costs are paid out of the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund (info here: http: / /edinamn.gov /pacs fund) which is funded by utility franchise fees. The amount you pay for taxes will not be affected by the construction of any sidewalk. Olinger Road is anticipated to be reconstructed in 2017. If the sidewalk remains on the Sidewalk Facilities Map, it would most likely be recommended for construction when the road is rebuilt. This will minimize impacts to residents, and save costs. The sidewalk would be constructed on City right -of -way, not on private property. The right -of -way on Olinger Rd is 66 -feet wide, and the current roadway width is approximately 31 -feet wide. Typically, the City recommends a 5 -foot planted boulevard and a five -foot concrete sidewalk. Additionally, if steep slopes require retaining walls to be built, these costs are also covered by the PACS Fund and are not assessed to homeowners. Again, thank you for your questions. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 -826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Amanda Simons [mailto:amandajsimons @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 5:31 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map Dear Mr. Nolan, I want to express my support for the proposed sidewalk map for the City of Edina and for my Northwest section. I was unable to be at the meeting to express my support. One of the cons for purchasing our home was that it lacked a sidewalk for our future children. Thank you for turning our con into a pro. My question and concern is regarding who will be paying for the sidewalk on my street, Olinger Road, and how the sidewalk will be constructed. Will it be a part of the current road or will you be taking land from our lot for a sidewalk? And will our taxes, which we already pay, cover the cost of the new sidewalk or will my property be assessed a special tax? With the upcoming 2015 -2016 street repairs and sewer repairs through a special assessment tax, you can see how I would prefer not to have another additional tax. Also, we live on the hill portion of Olinger Rd, would the sidewalk be built into our hill if it is on our side of the street? And would the city cover the cost for a retaining wall or charge that to me? Again, I like the idea of a sidewalk but cannot easily afford to pay for it in my lot if there are special assessments or additional costs to me as a homeowner. Thank you for hearing my support, concerns and questions: I look forward to some answers to my questions. 33 34 Mark K..Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan l Sent: Wednesday, November 19,2014 1:53 PM To:. 'Arne Cook' Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Sidewalk Plan Arne, Thank you for attending Monday night's meeting; and for your thoughts regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the northwest quadrant of the City. This input will be considered internally and included with.other resident correspondence . in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks "again, 1hh .h. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner •�' 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ....For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Arne Cook [mailto:arne.cook @icioud.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 12:58 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Sidewalk Plan Mark, 1 Thank you for hosting and leading the November 17 public forum to seek public -input on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment as it relates to future sidewalks. Although I applaud the City leaders and staff for wanting to create "livable streets" and safe sidewalk plans, I feel that this is not a "one size fits all" solution. In fact, I would argue that in some of the cases where sidewalks are planned, at best, it is a solution being applied to an instance where there is no problem and, at worst, sidewalks will actually make our streets " less •livable ". From the citizens, point of view this was clearly evident by the vast (95% plus) majority of those in attendance at the November 17 Northwest Edina public input meeting who strongly opposed the. sidewalk plans in their neighborhood. This was also the case in several of the neighborhoods in past years where a sidewalk plan "was proposed. I am sure (as evidenced by the. comments in Speak Up Edina) there are cases in Edina where neighborhoods need and want sidewalks. That said, I can tell you that it is my strong, opinion that we do not want and we do not need a sidewalk on Glengarry and/or Ashyre in the Highlands neighborhood. This view is shared by others in our neighborhood (based on an informal survey of my neighbors on Glengarry last week (9 of '10 surveyed opposed sidewalks). It is further evidenced by the strong opposition of from at least ten people from our neighborhood who attended and'spoke at your November 17 meeting. 35 Some of the reasons for opposition which I and others stated at the November 17 meeting are as follows: - Our neighborhood is already safe and walkable, as evidenced by the many walkers and bikers who use the streets - Since we already have a "livable street" installing AND maintaining sidewalks on Glengarry and Ashyre would be a waste of tax payer money. We observe that few people use the sidewalks already in place on Doncaster and Ashyre ... quite simply they prefer to walk and bike on the street. - The installation of sidewalks would have an adverse effect on the character of the street-and `our neighborhood. We and others moved here, in part, because the walkability of the streets and the inviting neighborhood character which is created when lawns and landscaping extend uninterrupted to the street.. - I and many others do not want to take on the responsibility, the cost or the liability associated with a sidewalk maintenance, especially if its a sidewalk that we and our neighbors ;don't want and won't use. In addition, others in our neighborhood may not have the physical ability or financial means to assume the added work and costs that sidewalk maintenance will entail. This concern .is compounded by street clearing of snow which extends high piles of snow many feet into our yard and whi& would cover the 'proposed sidewalks: - I believe that having pedestrians and bikers on the street actually has a calming influence on traffic ... which is one of the primary goals behind creating livable streets. - We need less not more impervious surfaces in the City of Edina especially if the newly created impervious surface is for sidewalks that are not needed or wanted. Just think how many acres of concrete would be installed if all the sidewalks on the plan were actually built. In closing, I strongly urge the Edina city leaders and staff to reconsider the plan as. presented, to perform a much _more thorough survey of the neighborhoods as to whether there is' an actual need for sidewalks and conduct a cost benefit analysis that incorporates initial and ongoing costs to assure the ultimate plan is prudent'. Thank you, Arne Cook 5408 Glengarry Pkwy I Edina, MN 55436 (612) 281 -2000 1 arne.cook(cDicloud.com 36 Mark K. Nolan From:. Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:06 PM To: 'Jennifer.Obrien' Subject: RE: Edina City Sidewalk Plan Ms. O'•,Brien, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the southeast quadrant of the City. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner . Q '►' F 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov Iry •_ For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6i;Doing Business From: Jennifer.Obrier [ mailto :Jennifer.Obrien @target.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 2:59 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW Edina City Sidewalk Plan From: Jennifer Obrien <Jennifer.Obrien @target.com> Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 at 2:54 PM To: "mnolan @edina.mn.Qov" <mnolan @edina.mn.gov> Subject: Edina City Sidewalk Plan n Hello Mr. Nolan, One of,my neighbors, Emily Winche Boettge, let me know this morning about a sidewalk planning meeting tonight. Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend, but Emily encourage me to email you in support of the proposed sidewalks along Cornelia and West Shore Drive. As a daily pedestrian with dogs, having a safer means to walk those busy areas would be greatly appreciated. In fact, my vote goes to having them installed sooner than, 20- 30.years. Thank you for your time. Jennifer O'Brien 4512 Balfanz Road Edina 55435- 37 ` i Mark K. Nolan From: Ronald R. Rich <rrr @atmrcv.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:01 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: 'James Hovland'; Chad Millner Subject: November Sidewalk Meeting Presentation and Studies Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed i Mark: Thank you for your response to my questions - I was traveling and unable attend the meetings. Sorry I missed them. So I hope you can help. As you may recall, my concern is the"process that has now lead to what appears to me to be a very unpopular plan. So I am trying to understand why the decisions were made and the information on which the decisions were based. For the Nov. 17 and 19 presentations, you promised me you would cite different studies than the one you referenced before — presumably studies that show majority resident support for new neighborhood sidewalks. I am most concerned because every other question relating to sidewalks in the very survey you cited — with the exceptions of question 150 and 47 — never show sidewalk support with more than a single digit percentage. And the questions never asked something like: "Would you be willing to support a sidewalk installed on your lawn" (regardless of who owns the right -of -way). So could you please attach (or provide a link to): 1. The presentation given at the meetings (presumably in PowerPoint) 2. The list of studies you may have referenced and a link to each indicating that Edina residents support additional neighborhood sidewalks 3. Documentation showing why a 5' spacing between the roadside and the proposed additional 5' sidewalks (a total of 10' of residential lawns) is the preferred sidewalk design. And links to the studies or reports that contain such recommendations. 4. Links to any other reports or studies helpful in understanding why sidewalks are being recommended Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com From: Mark K. Nolan [mailto:MNolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 12:35 PM To: 'Ronald R. Rich' Cc: 'James Hovland'; Chad Millner Subject: RE: November Sidewalk Meeting Schedule and Information Mr. Rich, 38 It was good to meet you as well. See my responses to your questions /requests below, in bold. Thank you, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 s MNolan@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ronald R. Rich [mailto:rrr @atmrcv.com] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 3:59 PM- To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: 'James Hovland' Subject: November Sidewalk Meeting Schedule and Information Trying again with Mayor Hovland's correct e-mail — sorry. Mark: It was nice to meet you during last Monday's City Council Meeting. I live at 7008 West Shore Drive, South of 70th. Along with every neighbor I know (save one) I was unaware of the sidewalk plan until two days before the City Council vote. I have learned a little more from your presentation and map. I also understand the City has been making such plans for many months. Even through the City never proactively notified those directly impacted (never a good idea). Many of us have questions and I am often the one in the neighborhood tasked with finding out more. You suggested that I e -mail my requests and questions, so I am doing so now — after listening to more neighbor concerns. To start with I have six requests /questions: 1. Have the four neighborhood November public meetings concerning the Edina Sidewalk plan been scheduled? Assuming so, please directly e-mail the schedule times and locations to me. Even if they are posted somewhere on the City website, most of us don't even know where to look. I will try to make sure my neighbors know. The four "quadrant" meetings have been scheduled. Below are the dates, times and locations of the meetings. Also, here is a link to the press release on the City's website, with some more detailed information for you and your neighbors: http: / /edinamn.gov /pressroom pressreleases &prrid =852 • Northwest Edina —6-8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square • Southwest Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard • Northeast Edina — 6 -8 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. • Southeast Edina — 6 -8 pm. Wednesday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works, 7450 Metro Boulevard 2. During your presentation, you indicated West Shore Drive sidewalks were added by City staff late in the process as a "safe route" to school. You also indicated to me after the meeting that car traffic volume on (presumably) West Shore Drive was the principal or sole reason. Assuming so, please include in your e-mail the traffic volume data and study itself that lead to that conclusion. And also include the traffic volume study that in 2008 presumably resulted in West Shore Drive NOT being included initially. West Shore Drive south of 70th Street is recommended for a sidewalk in the City's Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan, which was approved by unanimously by Council in February of this year (please note the recommendation on Figure 10 of the Plan: http:l /edinamn.goy /active routes to school). All sidewalk recommendations in the Active Routes to School Plan, due to its focus on getting students to and from school in a safe and healthy manner, have been incorporated into the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map. The Map 39 that was initially posted in early October missed this Active Routes to School recommendation; it was discovered by staff and revised in the Map presented to Council on November 3. Staff conducts vehicle traffic counts using tube counters and less commonly video cameras. The most recent traffic counts we have on file for West Shore Drive south of 70th St. are as follows: • North of Andover Rd: average daily traffic = 1,141, 85% speed = 28.4 mph (2006) • North of Andover Rd: average daily traffic= 1,059, 85% speed= 32.1 mph (2012) • North of Andover Rd: average daily traffic= 547,85% speed= 27.3 mph (2012) We have no counts on West Shore Drive south of 70th St in 2008. As you have stated, during the preliminary design process for the reconstruction of West Shore Dr. south of 70th St. a resident survey was conducted (in December of 2008). Of the ten West Shore Dr. residents that responded, nine selected "no" when asked if there was need for sidewalks. This, in addition to other factors (assessment and other impacts) led to City staff to remove this sidewalk from the project at that time. The sidewalk remains on the City's current adopted Comprehensive Plan. 3. You mentioned that a survey the City conducted indicated the majority of Edina residents wanted more sidewalks. Since no one I have talked to in the neighborhood received this survey, please include in the e-mail a blank sample questionnaire so we can understand what was asked and how it was phrased, along with the actual compilation of the survey results you cited. I was referring to the Quality of Life Survey conducted in 2013 by Decision Resources, who completed the random 194 - question survey of about 400 Edina residents from around the community in May and June of last year. This type of survey is conducted in communities throughout the metro area, and in Edina every two years or so. An executive summary of the survey can be found here: http• / /edinamn eov /corecode /uploads /document /uploaded pdfs /corecode edina /2013 %20Edina %20Survey %20Results 62.pdf. The data I was referring to in my presentation was found in question 150, which essentially says that 73% of respondents (those who said that walking in Edina is "only fair" or "poor ") said that "more sidewalks" can improve their ability to get from place to place in the City by walking. In hindsight, this may not have been the best question /data point to use, given how it was asked of a specific set of respondents. Note that question 47 indicates that 41% of respondents said that Edina has "too few /little" sidewalks. This data will be more clearly represented in upcoming public /City Council presentations. 4. 1 asked some on the City council (last weekend) what changes were made to the plan as a result of resident input. I believe you mentioned that some things were changed. But I am not clear specifically what. Please include in the e-mail a summary list of the specific changes made to the plan as a result of resident input so far as well as a list of all the changes requested. The following changes were made to the Sidewalk Facilities Map based on input from residents obtained during the Speak Up, Edina! comment period (from Oct. 3 through Oct. 27) and resulting staff research: • Future State Aid Sidewalk was added on the north side of W 78th St., on the bridge over Highway 100 • Future City Sidewalk was added on W 59th St. between Concord Ave and Wooddale Ave • Future City Sidewalk was added on W 49th St. east of Maple Rd. • Future City Sidewalk was added on Indian Hills Pass west of Gleason Rd. • Future City Sidewalk was removed from Concord Ave north of Lexington Ave. For resident comments and suggested changes regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Plan, refer to comments posted on the public Speak Up, Edinal discussion site here: http: / /speakupedina.org /discussions /sidewalk- facilities -map 5. 1 believe I understood from the City council meeting that the side of West Shore Drive (and other streets) where the sidewalk would be installed was not yet determined. However, city staff apparently conducted a survey to 40 locate that sidewalk on West Shore Drive earlier in the plan process. At least one neighbor inquired of staff why the east side was being surveyed and not the west. Staff said the decision had been made already and no survey of the west side was made. Can you include in the e-mail the reason why the east side was selected? You are correct in that the Comprehensive Plan (and the Sidewalk Facilities Map) does not determine on which side the sidewalks will eventually be constructed. This is also true of West Shore Drive. As far as we are aware, City staff has not had anyone doing any surveying on West Shore Dr. since the reconstruction project was done north of 70th St (in 2007). At that time the east side was surveyed north of 70th St., but the sidewalk was not included with the reconstruction project. The decision not to include a sidewalk north of 70th Street in 2007 was due to resident input and potential impacts. Please recall that at that time residents were assessed for the costs of sidewalks (which is no longer the case). Finally, the actual sidewalk position (adjacent to the curb or with a grass separation) is an important consideration and not included in your presentation. Since the city survey for the sidewalk on West Shore Drive has apparently been completed, should I assume the position relative to the curb has also been determined? If so what is the plan? I ask because I believe the council will placate those impacted by paying for the sidewalk using city -wide funds. But it is unclear if the city will also become responsible for clearing the snow. If they accept responsibility, a placement adjacent to the curb would allow the city to plow the sidewalk using street plowing equipment. It not, city clearing costs will be high and residents are more likely to become responsible. As stated above, the side of the street for the recommended future sidewalk on West Shore Dr. has not been determined, nor has the specific boulevard width. These will not be determined until the sidewalks are scheduled for construction, which for the portion of West Shore Dr. we are currently discussing could be anywhere from 20 to 30 years in the future (since this street was recently reconstructed, as discussed by Director Millner at the Nov. 3 Public Hearing). Again, the construction of the sidewalks on local streets (including related impacts such as retaining walls, re- grading, landscape restoration, etc.) are /will be paid for from the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund and not assessed to residents. Given the timeline, and the fact that the sidewalk is recommended in the Active Routes to School Plan, it is not yet clear if the City would be removing snow on this portion of sidewalk (we are currently studying staffing and equipment costs for snow removal operations). However, if City crews did remove snow, Public Works Director Brian Olson has stated a preference for a sidewalk with a minimum S -foot boulevard (wherever possible) for snow storage, to avoid snow being pushed back - and -forth between street crews and sidewalk crews. Thank you for you help; I look forward to seeing your presentation at the neighborhood meetings. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344. USA Office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com o C1vast! This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. k r" 41 „ C]VCZStf This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection. is active. 42 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9 :04 AM To: 'Diane Schroeder' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Ms. Schroeder, . . .Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan; AICP, Transportation Planner. 952 - 826 -0322 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov .::For Living, Learning, Raising Families ,& Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Diane Schroeder [mailto:neesawicki @icloud.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 7:38 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalk Facility Map am all in favor of more sidewalks! I am a runner, biker, walker, and parent. I also live off the frontage road to 100 north of Benton and have experienced the transformation of the area since the sidewalks went in along the frontage road. We are a community now! It has been a wonderful change. Diane Schroeder 43 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Thursday, November 20,2014 10:40 AM To: 'Lynn Duane' . Subject: RE: In support of sidewalks Ms. Duane, Thank you for your comments supporting the Sidewalk Facilities Map for the City. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan,'AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 =0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Lynn Duane [mailto:lynnduane @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014.10:01 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: In support of sidewalks I live in Southeast Edina, and attended the meeting on Nov. 19th at the Public Works Building. I support the addition of sidewalks as discussed. Lynn Duane .4400 Fondell Drive Edina, MN 55435 I.I W Mark K. Nolan From: James Hovland <jhovland @hovlandrasmus.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 201411;34 AM To: Tim ONeill /ONeill Brothers; Mark.K. Nolan Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: RE: in support of sidewalks Thanks, Tim. Your input is greatly appreciated. I have heard from another young family in another part of town this morning because of the article in the newspaper that is also supportive of an expanded sidewalk system. James B. Hovland, Esquire HOVLAND & RASMUS,,PLLC Southdale Office Centre 6800 FranceAvenue.S., Suite 190 Edina, MN 55435 jhovland @hovlandrasmus.com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Direct: (612) 874 -8551 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 From: ,Tim ONeill /ONeill Brothers [mailto:tim@pianobrothers.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:02 AM To! Mark K. Nolan Cc: James Hovland; Scott H. Neal Subject: Re: in support of sidewalks And thank you for sorting through it all and making tough forward - looking decisions for our great city! Tim Tim O'Neill The O'Neill Brothers www.nianobrothers.com 612.377.4249 (home office) Over 10. million copies sold. Make someone's day today! On Nov 20, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Mark K. Nolan <MNolan@a,EdinaN4N.gov> wrote: Tim, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the northeast quadrant of the City. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report.. Thanks again, 45 Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner <lma e001. 1 952 -826 -0322 1 Fax 952 -826 -0392 g g MNolanna.EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Tim ONeill / ONeill Brothers [mailto:tim @pianobrothers.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 10:01 AM To: James Hovland Cc: Scott H. Neal; Mark K. Nolan Subject: in support of sidewalks Importance: High Hi Mark and Mayor Hovland - I'm sorry that I was not able to make the sidewalk meeting and that according to this article, the majority of attendees were against the sidewalks planned for Edina. http://m.startribune.com/local/west/283286561.html As a father of four kids, 5 and under, living one block off of France, sidewalks (and more importantly the lack of them) are /would be vital to the safety of my children when we walk to our neighboring parks. I could easily get 30+ dads in our small KnollCreek neighborhood alone to echo the same message if you need more voices. Thank you for listening to the loud voices and remembering that according to the Speak Up Edina data and the majority of Edina residents, sidewalks are not only wanted, but needed here in Edina. What's old, worked for Edina years ago, but things have changed and change is needed. Have a wonderful Thanksgiving with your families and thank you for all that you do for our awesome city of Edina. Tim O'Neill 3537 W Fuller St The O'Neill Brothers 612.377.4249 (home office) www.pianobrothers.com Over 10 million copies sold Make someone's day today! Follow and learn more: https://www.facebook.com/ONeillBrothersPianoMusic https :Htwitter.com /pianobrothers On Nov 4, 2014, at 3:09 PM, James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com> wrote: Tim, thanks for the very nice note and a belated welcome to Edina! The bump -outs on Xerxes were an excellent idea but the design, at least in my mind, while being 46 efficacious, certainly falls far short of the mark in terns .of a street enhancement. I don't know what the potential solutions might be(planters - ?) but. we needlo, figure out something. I hope the county is cooperative. Thanks for being interested in this matter. James B. Hovland, Esquire HOVLAND & RASMUS, PLLC Southdale Office Centre 6800. France Avenue S., Suite 190 Edina; MN 55435 jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com Phone: (612) 874-8550 'Direct: (612) 874 -8551 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 - - - -- Original Message---- - From Lynette Biunno f mailto:lbiunnogEdinaMN. gov] On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 1:39 PM Subject: FW: Xerxes Ave Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 lbiunnogEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tim ONeill / ONeill Brothers [mailto:timgpianobrothers.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 1:37 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Chris Bremer; jan.callisonnhennepin.us Subject: Xerxes Ave Dear Mayor Hovland - Thank you for the great job that you are doing in leading our "vibrant city of Edina!, My wife Annie and I are originally from New Prague, MN but moved into Edina's Creek Knoll neighborhood with our four children three years ago and are loving it. I am writing today about the appearance of Xerxes Ave, and I understand that you will be discussing this issue on Nov 101th. I completely see the need to stop people from the unsafe -passing that takes place on the shoulder on Xerxes, but the solution of the white posts looks absurd! I have traveled all over the world and I have never seen something like them. Certainly there is a better, more attractive option to melcome drivers entering our lovely city from our Eastern boundary? Please reconsider another option that better represents this cutting edge town in which we live. Thank you again for your service to our city of Edina. Tim O'Neill 47 3537 W Fuller St The ONeill Brothers 612.377.4249 (home office) www.pianobrothers.com Over 10' million copies sold Make someone's day today! Follow and learn more: htips://NVww.facebook.com/ONeillBrothersPianoMusic https:Htwitter.com/pianobrothers No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.ava.com Version: 2013.0.3495 / Virus Database: 4189/8595 - Release Date: 11/19/14 48 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 1:54 PM To: 'Aly Silva Mulgrew' Subject: RE: Sidewalk Facility Map Ms. Mulgrew, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map in the northwest quadrant of the City. This input will be co.nsidered.internally and included with other resident correspondence, in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &r Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Aly Silva Mulgrew [ mailto :alysilvamulgrew @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 20141:20 PM To: Mark K. Nolan. Subject:. Sidewalk Facility Map am writing in support of Edina's proposal to add.additional sidewalks to the city. We are a family with three young, children and very much enjoy,walking and biking around Edina. However, the current lack of sidewalks makes this hard to do _ we are in constant danger of being plowed down by cars. We live on Cooper Avenue and I am very pleased to see that sidewalks are proposed both along,Cooper Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. We often walk down to Todd Park and sidewalks would make this m1uch safer, more enjoyable and allow my children as they grow more independence (I don't feel safe having them walk/ bike alone without sidewalks). I am EXTREMELY pleased to see sidewalks proposed along Interlachen Boulevard, Mirror Lakes neighborhood,. and near the Grandview area fortwo reasons. I have often. wanted to walk to school but am unable to accomplish this safely with strollers, walking, scooters because Interlachen is so busy and has no.sidewalks. I hope that the plan also includes crosswalks at key junctions (Cooper Avenue, Oxford Avenue, Vandervork Avenue) to allow residents to safely cross Interlachen. We are supporters of Active Routes to School and fully support the addition of,sidewalks along Cooper Avenue, Interlachen and the Highlands neighborhood to allow our children safe access to school via bikes, scooters, walking, strollers. Aly Mulgrew 49 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 3:11 PM To: 'Katie Stockwell'; Edina Mail Cc: Jason Stockwell Subject: RE: We support the sidewalks proposed for Edina Highlands Neighborhood Ms. Stockwell, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your support for sidewalk facilities in the Highland Neighborhood. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner M 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov �•.,� , -s ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Katie Stockwell [ mailto:kat.stockwell @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:23 PM To: Mark K. Nolan; Edina Mail Cc: Jason Stockwell Subject: We support the sidewalks proposed for Edina Highlands Neighborhood Dear Mayor Hovland &.Mr. Nolan- Just a quick note to show our support and gratitude for the proposed sidewalks in our neighborhood (Highlands). Several of our neighbors keep referencing the fact that a "majority" of the neighborhood doesn't want them citing a petition signed several years ago. However, we are "new" residents (as of Jan 2012) and we were never a part of any such petition and due to safety concerns and the overall value sidewalks would add to our neighborhood we STRONGLY support the proposed sidewalks. It's so frustrating to have to tie ropes onto our kids' bikes and insist my preschoolers sitlin a stroller vs. being able to walk (as they'd prefer) and get more exercise. We have even driven to other neighborhoods WITH sidewalks in edina just so I don't have to worry about the safety concern of my kids in the street. It was also one of the major drawbacks when we were contemplating a purchase in the highlands neighborhood. I would hate the for this fact to be a setback for any other families considering our quaint neighborhood in the future. Respectfully - Katie Stockwell 50 Katie Stockwell Finding Your Element "Beauty isn't about looking perfect. It's about celebrating your individuality." -Bobbi Brown ii J= me 51 Mark K. Nolan From: Jason Stockwell <jason @jasonstockwell.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 3 :56.PM' . To: Mark K Nolan; 'Katie Stockwell'; Edina Mail Subject: RE: We support the sidewalks proposed for Edina Highlands Neighborhood Hi Mark, I just replied to James and,Katie with this below. My apologies, I did not see your reply until now. It would be great to have sidewalks in most allof Edina. Thanks James, I was having a discussion this sidewalk deal with Keith White who lives in Country Club area the other day. He made a great point that sidewalks actually make your neighborhood a neighborhood. People go for walks more and feel comfortable when there's a sidewalk. He and his family go for walks on their neighborhood sidewalks all of the time and they would not be inclined to do so if they had to walk on the street (no matter how wide the street is).. Katie, me, Asher and Victoria go for walks to the park all summer and it is extremely stressful w/ 2 little children on the street,.with parked cars and lots of moving cars. The sidewalk would dramatically improve the neighborhood as more people would meet their neighbors and people would be more comfortable getting out without having to deal with cars. Looking,focward to sidewalks in all of Edina for the benefit of the residents. Thanks Jason Stockwell The Stockwell Home Selling Team - RE /ALNX Results 952 -848 -2575 office 612- 636 -6350 cell 952- 848 -2410 fax www.asonStockwell.com - Licensed AIN &%V1 The size ofyour success is detennined by the size of your belief." mm.obeo.com/jasonstockwell - rehabbed homes Free Point & Click App for your phone: http://app.resuIts.net/jason.stockwelI From: Mark K. Nolan [mailto:MNolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 3:11 PM To: 'Katie Stockwell'; Edina Mail Cc: Jason Stockwell Subject: RE: We support the sidewalks proposed for Edina Highlands Neighborhood Ms. Stockwell, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your support for sidewalk facilities in the Highland Neighborhood. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, 52 SNL..�. . f�. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner @ '•'' 962-826-0322'1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 ; ; s MNolanREdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Katie Stockwell [ mailto :kat.stockwell(abgmail.com] Sent: 'Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:23 PM To:, Mark K.,Nolan; Edina Mail Cc: Jason Stockwell Subject: We support the sidewalks proposed for Edina Highlands Neighborhood Dear Mayor Hovland & Mr. Nolan- Just a quick note to show our support and gratitude for the proposed sidewalks in our neighborhood (Highlands). Several of our neighbors keep referencing the fact that a "majority" of the neighborhood doesn't want them citing a petition signed several years ago. However; we are. "new" residents. (as of Jan 2012) and we were never a part of any such petition and due to safety concerns and the overall value;sidewalks would add to our neighborhood we STRONGLY support the proposed sidewalks. - It's so frustrating to have to tie ropes onto our'kids' bikes and insist my preschoolers sit in a stroller vs. being able to walk (as they'd prefer) and get more exercise. We have even driven to other neighborhoods WITH sidewalks in edina just so I don't have to worry about the safety concern of my kids in'the street. It was also one of the major drawbacks when we were contemplating a purchase in the highlands neighborhood. I would hate the for this fact to be a setback for any other families considering our quaint neighborhood in the future. Respectfully - Katie Stockwell Katie Stockwwell Finding Your Element "Beauty isn't about looking perfect. It's about celebrating your individuality." -Bobbi Brown 53 Mark K..Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan' Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 8:08 AM To' 'John Meeker' Subject: RE: Support for sidewalk on Oaklawn Ave John, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your support for sidewalk facilities in your neighborhood. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks.again, tiyttan,.'r+�. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation, Planner G @ Y 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ... For .tiving, Learning, Raising Families 6z Doing Business From: John Meeker [mailto:john @johnmeeker.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014.6:39 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Support for sidewalk on Oaklawn Ave This to voice thesupport of my wife and I for sidewalks on the east sided Oaklawn. We moved'here 23 years ago when our oldest son was 8 months old. Access to Cornelia school and park was a strong factor. Now, to bring younger families with children to the community, we are very supportive of expanding sidewalks for both children and senior residents. Safety for all citizens is the key factor. Be in touch if you have questions. John John Meeker, Ph.D. Writer and Publisher, HOW TO MAKE LIFE WORK AFTER A LIFETIME OF WORK: "BALANCE NEW BEGINNINGS FOR YOURSELF, MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR OTHERS AND WORK ON YOUR OWN TERMS iohn @iohnmeeker.com 612 750 -3826 54 Mark K. Nolan From: Joshua M. Ahlberg <josh.ahlberg @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 21, 201410:21 AM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast) Cc: Mark K. Nolan; Kelli Ahlberg Subject: Re: Valley View Rd. Sidewalk / Lights Need Thank you, Mary. Please do the same, and reach out to me directly if you have any questions or concerns. All the best, Josh 612.916.2482 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Mary Brindle <mbrindle@comcast.net> wrote: Hello Joshua, Thank you for your email message below. I appreciate have your detailed perspective. Thank you also for taking time to attend the sidewalk meeting on Monday evening. wish you and your family and restful Thanksgiving holiday. Mary Brindle. Mary Brindle mbrindle @comcast.net 612 - 270 -9887 call or text From: Joshua M. Ahlbera Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 9:54 AM To: Mark K. Nolan ; mbrindle(5)comcast.net Cc: Kelli Ahlberg Subject: Re: Valley View Rd. Sidewalk / Lights Need _ Mr. Nolan & Ms. Brindle, I wanted to both thank you, and let you know that was in attendance of the planning session for the Edina sidewalk projects in the SW earlier this week and found it insightful. Patrick did a good job helping the citizens in attendance understand the terminology, the city initiatives, the limitations, and helped facilitate a lively discussion. I also wanted to once again underscore the absolute need to build a sidewalk on Valley View Rd between Gleason and Bello. In that meeting we discussed how these projects were assessed, and the criterion by which they are measured to determine their level of priority for the community. This stretch of Valley View hit on several of these priority triggers, which I believe merits funding it as an immediate (relatively speaking) ad- hoc /one -off project for the city. These triggers are: • Active School Route: Valley View Rd is used heavily by school age children walking to and from school. For students within walking distance of the school (which I believe was .7 miles), they have no 55 choice but to walk to class. The south /western /south western portion of this radius clearly identifies a perilous walk for these students. See the attached map (apologies for it's crude nature), which shows the area I am referring to -- outlined in green. Existing routes off of the top of my head are highlighted in red. You can see students walking from this area have no real choice but to either risk the danger of walking Valley View Rd., or take a longer route to school to walk safely due to the lack of sidewalk on Valley View Rd. • Traffic Count: Traffic counts exceeding 500 cars per hour are considered priority. Valley View Rd., according to readouts I was shown on the boards was 400 -500% that number. •. Average Traffic Speed: We spoke about when more than 85% of the traffic exceeds the speed limit, this also merits priority. The average speed on Valley View Rd. is 33 MPH+ (30 MPH limit). • Valley View Rd. will be a broken link with the new sidewalks being installed on the south end of Valley View Rd, and therefore (according to Mary) important to the city to complete. - • Valley View Rd. serves as a through road. During heavy congestion times -- rush hours, when children are heading to and from school -- traffic backs up significantly and adds to the danger to pedestrians. This fact is exacerbated by cars parking on the odd side of the street, squeezing pedestrian traffic into the woods to avoid danger. • Lighting is a serious issue. This is an ancillary need, but lacking any real lighting in this stretch of road makes it even more treacherous for pedestrian traffic -- including children walking to and from school. During the inter months this is particularly worrisome with sunset happening very early int he evening when children are still leaving school. There are a number of other factors that also 'add to the danger of that particular route, but I won't go into more detail. I know that there are a number of projects you are considering as you approach next year, but I ask for your partnership to.make this particular project a priority. It's a clear shortcoming in the sidewalk infrastructure, and poses a threat to the citizens in the area. In my opinion, and that of many of my peers in the meeting I attended, it should be prioritized over other projects I would consider renovation or enhancement. Basic public safety should always come as the highest priority, and citizens like myself on Valley View Rd. do not have that safety at present. The last thing I will say is that I believe the lack of sidewalks is also creating some of the traffic problem. Parents feeling pressured to pick up and drop off their children use Valley View as a route to get to and from their schools. While I do not have any empirical evidence to support this argument, I do feel as though adding a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. would ease the minds of some parents, which would in turn increase their children's ability to walk to and from school. It was mentioned several times in this session that it is a strategic priority of the city to ease automobile traffic. I believe adding in a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. ladders up to that strategic initiative and would help. All of that said, I am more than happy to attend more of these meetings to help actively serve as the voice of support for those not in attendance. In addition, I am more than willing to talk about this matter live to speak through any of these concerns. Please let me know how I can help the cause. Thank you for your time. 56 Joshua M..Ahlberg 6825 Valley VieW Rd. 612.916.2482 On Fri, Sep .19, 2014 at 8 :25 AM, Mark K. Nolan <M Nolan @edinamn.gov> wrote: Mr. Ahlberg, Again, thanks for your thoughts.The funding source_ used for the Valley View Road reconstruction project you referenced — State -Aid funds - is different then what is used for stand - alone sidewalk projects, when (typically) the City's PACS.Fund is used. We are unable to transfer funds,from one to•the other. Also, the bike lane costs,.which involve little more than pavement markings, are considerably less than those needed to construct a sidewalk. Your concerns regarding 'pedestrians are valid and supported by the.City's Transportation Commission and elected officials. We appreciate hearing from residents regarding such concerns; and encourage continued engagement by you and your neighbors. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joshua M. Ahlberg [mailto:josh.ahlberg @gmaii.com] Sent: Thursday, September 18,`2014 3:18 PM To: -Mark K. Nolan Cc: Edina Mail; Kelli Ahlberg ' Subject: Re": Valley View Rd. Sidewalk / Lights Need Thank you, Mark. I.appreciate the information, and support of a plan that puts pedestrians ahead of cyclists in the queue. While I agree that having a cycle - friendly community is important, having a roadway that supports safe pedestrian travel is absolutely mandatory. 57 To that end,, is there any. way of affecting the proposed plans for the bike addition referenced HERE to help free up funding to build a safe Valley View Rd. -- southwest of Gleason? I assume you gain efficiencies from working on the entire= scop'e.of the project -- including the -bike portion? However, if some of that funding could. 'be siphoned off to build a basic sidewalk (which I would. consider a much more worthy project that would help . protect the children and other` pedestrians I referenced in my original correspondence),`that would be ideal. It really is a crucial need,.as basic pedestrian conditions are simply unsafe at this point. I truly do appreciate your thoughtful and thorough response, and look forward to continuing the conversation to help make Edina an even better place to live. Kind regards, - Joshua M. Ahlberg 612.916.2482 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Mark K. Nolan <MNolan e,edinamn.gov> wrote: Mr. Ahlberg, Thank you for your email. Valley View Road from McCauley Tr to Mark Terrace Dr is planned to be reconstructed next year, and the current draft plans include a sidewalk (with decorative lighting) on the south side of the roadway in that section. While the City would like to do the same for the remainder of Valley View Rd to Gleason Rd,.there are not enough State Aid funds to do so at this time. However, the City's,2008 Comprehensive Plan and current Draft Sidewalk Plan indicate a sidewalk for the entire length of Valley View Rd west of Gleason Rd. What this means is that a sidewalk is envisioned there in the future, but is not currently programmed. Other than State Aid funds (which are used on State Aid roadways like Valley View), the City funds its sidewalks from its Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (http. / /edinamn.gov /pacs fund). This fund is currently limited to just over $1 million- per year, and as you can imagine there isa great deal of competing demands for these funds..However, we do value resident input and will continue to plan and prioritize our pedestrian network on an annual basis. Thanks again for your input, 58 Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner x Sri 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 ii ,j` J• MNolanAEdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing.Business From:, Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:51 PM to: 'Mark K. 'Nolan Subject: FW: Valley View Rd. Sidewalk/ Lights Need U Hi Mark, Can you assist this person ?? Lynette Biunno, Receptionist yirr 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826,0389 Ibiunno(a EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joshua M. Ahlberg [ mailto :josh.ahlbergCcbgmmail.com] Sent:7hursday, September 18; 201.4 1:47 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Kelli.Ahlberg Subject: Valley View Rd. Sidewalk / Lights Need Hi there, I wanted to reach out and begin/engage in a conversation about the need to build a sidewalk on Valley View Rd in Edina. I am a resident who recently moved onto Valley View from Olinger Blvd., and I was aghast to see that there is no safe pedestrian walkway on Valley View Rd: at my new house. 59 y The reason I see this as so problematic is for a few reasons; 1. My wife and I like to run in the mornings; as well as walk our dogs, and we have no safe way of'doing so until we get up to Gleason. It's fairly perilous,until then, as-people speed through the neighborhood. not looking for pedestrians. 2. School children from the Edina schools nearby walk down Valley View to get home, and having them walk on the street is extremely DANGEROUS. 3. Particularly at night, the walk is very scary. Adding a'sidewalk and lights (or alight) would'be very helpful. I ask that you please consider adding a sidewalk and lights to the road -- especially given the new push in the community to. make it so bike friendly. In my opinion, we could use pedestrian routes BEFORE adding bike routes to all of-the roads that are already serviced with safe pedestrian walkways. Thank you for the consideration, and I ask that you please respond to my email with thoughts on the matter. Kind regards, - Joshua M. Ahlberg 6825 Valley View Rd. Edina, NIN 55439 612.916:2482 Mark, K. Nolan From: Mark K. -Nolan Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:05 AM To:. 'Justin:Hu' Cc: kevin @stauntonlaw.com . -Subject: RE:,5304 Ayrshire Blvd Justin, It was good to meet you at the meeting on the 17th. As we discussed at -the meeting, the Future Active Routes to School (ARTS) sidewalk connection displayed on the map near your property was included because it was recommended in the ARTS Plan. As I stated last Monday, in hindsight I believe that this (and' another similar connection in the southeast section) should not be shown given the difference between a concrete sidewalk on public property, and a "potential" pathway that would require discussions /negotiations with property owners. I am having this taken off the Sidewalk Facilities Map. I also want to be sure to thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your opposition for sidewalk facilities in your (Highlands)�neighborhood. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, . Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner r' 952 - 826 - 03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 " MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.Edin6MN.gov r�•�.- a ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Justin Hu [mailto:justinhu.hbs @gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:31 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: kevin @stauntonlaw.com Subject: Fwd: 5304 Ayrshire Blvd Mark, my name is Justin.Hu and we spoke briefly last Monday 11/17 at the Edina Senior Center. My family lives in Highlands at 5304 Ayrshire Blvd (immediately behind Highlands Elementary). While I have significant concern around the sidewalk referendum, I have even greater concern around the marked expropriation of 'my personal property (see the Highlands Map attachment to see specifically the area to whichTm referring). You can see attached images of the path that we created when we completely redid our landscaping '(all at our personal cost) to ensure that the neighborhood children could easily access the school vs. having to take a circuitous route there.. I would either like confirmation that the map will be revised so lines are not drawn on my personal property or a more specific explanation as to why the city feels that they can simply usurp personal property for public consumption (even if for. illustrative purposes on a publicly circulated map). Additionally, around the - broader sidewalk issue, I've also attached images of our front yard to illustrate how little space there is. There is probably 15 feet at its widest and closer to 10 feet from..the front walkway, not to mention the two mature trees that you see right along the road. As'evidenced from our discussion, there was a clear majority of those who opposed the sidewalk issue, and not surprisingly the handful that did, would have very little. (to no) exposure to their private property. I would suspect that, few would have had concerns if the impact of the sidewalk referendum impacted them as greatly as it imacts us and our neighbors. 61 Rest assured, we will pull any and all levers to ensure that our neighborhood is not included in this measure, similar to what happened 6 years ago, when from my understanding this discussion was last discussed and clearly opposed. Kevin (one of our city council reps), I am including you on this note as I would like to schedule some time to discuss this further. Stephanie is back and we would be available to discuss further, ideally before Thanksgiving. Thanks both for your time and Kevin, I look forward to discussing with you further. Regards, Justin Hu ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Justin Hu <iustinhu.hbs@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:00 AM Subject: 5304 Ayrshire Blvd To: Justin Hu <justinhu.hbs(@gmail.com> 62 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:28 AM To: 'Jack Meenan'; tmuse @sehinc.com Cc: Chad Millner Subject: RE: Feedback on Sidewalk Map and how it affects Arden Project (Halifax Ave) Mr. Meenan, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map and sidewalks in the Arden Park Neighborhood. This input will be considered internally and included with other resident correspondence in the Dec. 2 City Council packet /report. Thanks again, O1,A, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jack Meenan [mailto:jtmeenan @outlook.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 2:20 PM To: Mark K. Nolan; tmuse @sehinc.com Cc: Chad Millner Subject: Feedback on Sidewalk Map and how it affects Arden Project (Halifax Ave) My name is John (Jack) Meenan. I live at 5300 Halifax Ave S. attended the Edina Sidewalk meeting for the Northeast quadrant on Nov 19. 1 have also reviewed the presentations and the engineering report for the Arden project posted on the City of Edina web site. Here is my feedback on the overall Sidewalk map and specifically how it affects Halifax Ave as part of the Arden project. • In general, I am not supportive of the plan to put in sidewalks on all streets of Edina. Specifically, I was against the sidewalk that was built on the east side of Halifax a few years ago and spoke against at the City Council meeting.. Nevertheless, the sidewalk was approved and built on the east side of Halifax. • Given that the City Council has taken the decision that sidewalks will be built in Edina, then I think the sidewalk map presented is a good one and seems to address the criteria set forth by the City Council. So, I would accept that plan as a reasonable one. • Now back to Halifax Ave. The plan presented shows Edina as a connector street requiring a sidewalk on one side of the street. Since we already have a sidewalk on the east side of the street, the plan does not call for a second one to be built on the west side of Halifax. I support that plan. • 1 understand that some of my neighbors are bringing forth a petition to build a sidewalk on the west side of Halifax as part of the street reconstruction project. I live on the west side of the street. I was asked to sign the petition and declined to do so. While I respect the right of my neighbors to bring forward a petition like this, I do not agree. Building a sidewalk on the west side of Halifax it is not consistent with the Sidewalk map and should not be approved. • As a special note, our property has a huge elm in our front yard near the curb. I do not see how building a sidewalk on the west side could be done without damaging this tree. Jack Meenan 5300 Halifax Ave S. 63 Mark K.:Nolan From: Ronald R. Rich <rrr @atmrcv.com.> Sent: Monday,, November 24, 2014 10:11 AM To: 'James Hovland' Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad Millner, Mark K. Nolan Subject: Information Needed Today Jim: appreciate the responses. But my issue -is not public "input ". It rarely makes any significant impact to a Staff recommendation anyway. My issue is understanding the information used by City staff (and by extension City Council) to determine that sidewalks are an important issue to pursue. I can't find any meaningful information_ showing this. Staff cited only one citizen survey, and overall it indicates that sidewalks are a low citizen priority for City expenditures.. Promises were made to me, by Mark Nolan at the Nov. council meeting that more relevant studies would be presented at the later Nov. citizen meetings. Apparently none were. And my requests for such information have so far been ignored. I would so.far have to conclude that no valid data was used to select the streets needing sidewalks in advance. Instead City staff appears to have decided which "streets to include first, then use whatever selective information they could cite (anecdotal or otherwise) plus short term auto traffic counts to make sure the "criteria" they used included the streets preselected. Not a good planning process. More sidewalks-might still be a great addition to Edina. Or not. I can't tell. That's why I asked for the information underpinning the decision criteria. Assuming there is such data, it should be public information. Please see what you can do to have it e- mailed to me. Today. Thanks. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952 7941 -6500 Fax: 952 =941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com From: James Hovland [ mailto :jhoviand @hovlandrasmus.com] Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014.9:45 PM To: Ronald R. Rich Subject: RE: Resident Input Deadline Help. Ron, the procedural problem now is that the public hearing was closed at the last Council meeting.. 'Supplemental input was to occur through the quadrant meetings and through additional written submissions. The public hearing will not be reopened. I-am gathering a few ideas through the process and would be interested in hearing your thoughts as well. Maybe we can talk tomorrow. 64 Sent rmm my Ved— Wirdm 4G LTE maitpho - - =. -- Original message -- - - - - -- From: "Ronald R. Rich" <rrr @atmrcv.coin> Date:11 /23/2014 5:19 PM (GMT - 06:00) To: James Hovland <jhovland @hovlandrasmus.com> Cc:,'Joanne' <jgbolduc @msn.com >, "'Mark K. Nolan "' <MNolan@EdinaMN.gov >, 'Chad Millner' <cmllner @EdinaMN. gov> Subject:: Resident Input Deadline Help. Jim: am told residents will not be allowed to provide "input' on the "living streets" sidewalk issue after tomorrow or Tuesday ( "Speak Up Edina" says 11/20 — already. passed). I also am told that no public comment will be allowed during the December 2 Council meeting vote on this, issue. The City has poorly communicated and appears to have used very little meaningful data in presenting its case for sidewalks (and its consequences) to the.'affected residents so far. And the information provided on the "Speak Up" City website nowhere cites the basis for determining the "staff recommended" location criteria. Without the promised response from City staff to my questions, I will not be able to understand and share with my directly affected and angry West Shore Drive neighbors what might otherwise be a reasonable rational behind this plan. Please see what you can do to have the information e- mailed.to me by tomorrow morning. Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere. Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952- 941 -6500 Fax`. 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com FYI, this is what I e- mailed Mark Nolan and copied you upon my return to the office last week: Mark Thank you for your response to my questions - I was traveling and unable attend the meetings. Sorry I missed them. So I hope you can help. As you may recall, my concern is the process that has now lead to what appears to me to be a very unpopular plan. So I am trying to understand why the decisions were made and the information omwhich the decisions were based. For the Nov. 17 and 19 presentations, you promised me you would cite different studies than the one you referenced before — presumably studies that show majority resident support for new neighborhood sidewalks. I am most ..concerned because every other question .relating to sidewalks in the very survey you cited — with the:exceptions of question 150 and 47'— never show sidewalk support with .more than a single digit percentage. And the questions never asked something like: "Would you be willing to support a sidewalk installed on your lawn" (regardless of who owns the right -of -way). r So could you please attach (or provide a link to): 1. The presentation given at the meetings (presumably in PowerPoint) 65 2. The list of studies you may have referenced and a link to each indicating that Edina residents support additional neighborhood sidewalks 3. Documentation showing why a 5' spacing -between the roadside and the proposed additional 5' sidewalks (a total of .10' of residential lawns) is the, preferred sidewalk design. And links to the studies or reports that contain such recommendations. 4.. Links to any other reports or studies helpful in understanding,why sidewalks are being recommended Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952-941-6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com n [ va-str This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. C1varat This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 66 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 24, 201410:52 AM To: 'Ronald R. Rich'; 'James Hovland' Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad_Millner Subject: RE: Resident Input Deadline'Help. - Attachments: Sidewalk Facilities Map Quadrant-Meetings Presentation. pdf - Mr. Rich, Thanks for your email. This is also a response to your email sent on Thursday, Nov. 20. Regarding resident input (as stated in your email below): residents can provide input via email through today that will be included in the Dec. 2 Council packet; this is due to the holiday this week as Council packets must be prepared, approved, and distributed'ahead of time. However, you and your neighbors can provide input via,email directly to Council at anytime, including between now and Dec. 2. Additionally, the online Speak Up, Edina! discussion is open until Nov. 30 (on the web page it states "Closes 2014 -11- 30"). Any input received via that site (we have received over 90 responses thus far) by the end of the day today will be included in the Dec.2 Council packet; however, the site will remain open for public comment through Nov. 30. You are correct in that Council.closed the public hearing on Nov. 3, so testimony regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Plan will not be taken at the Dec. 2 meeting. Please recall that in addition to the online and email comments (I have received and responded to over 50 individual emails regarding this topic in the past two weeks), there have been two public hearings (at one of which you testified) and four public meetings held within the past month regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Plan. All of this input will be received by Council at their Dec. 2 meeting. The following are responses corresponding to the numbers in your Nov. 20 email: 1. 1 have attached the presentation from the Quadrant Input Meetings 2. In my previous email I provided you with a link to the 2013 Quality of Life Survey. I also referred to the . Community Needs Assessment Survey, the results of which were presented to the Park Board last month. In that Park and Recreation survey, 85% of respondents stated that their household has a need for "walking and biking trails." The results of this survey— which indicates citywide support for increased walkability in Edina — can be found here (along with a video of the presentation): http : / /edinamn.gov /parkpro!ects. 3. ,Please refer to the following;' a. MnDOT's 'Minnesota's Best Practices for Pedestrian /Bicycle Safety' discusses preferred sidewalk and boulevard widths (see page 3 of the document): http: / /www.dot.state.mh.us /stateaid /trafficsafety/ reference /ped- bike - handbook - 09.18.2013- vl.pdf b. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has conducted studies /reports that find that (in addition to reducing walking along roadway crashes) roadways without sidewalks can be more than twice as likely to have pedestrian crashes as roadways with sidewalks. Additionally, the FHWA states that "the wider, the separation between the pedestrian and'the "roadway is, the more comfortable the pedestrian facility." Link with study references: http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /ped bike /tools solve /walkways trifold/ c. The FHWA also has stated that "a natural buffer. [boulevard] provides the essential space needed for situations such as protecting pedestrians from out -of- control vehicles." Link: http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /ped bike /univcourse /pdf /swlessl3.pdf d. According to Safe Routes to.School guidelines: "The-preferred minimum sidewalk width recommended for safe routes to schools is five to six feet." Follow this link' httP: // guide. saferoutesinfo.org /engineering /sidewaIks.cfm 67 f e. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Architecture Barriers Act (ABA) guidelines state that sidewalks less than five feet in width are insufficient for wheelchair users to pass one another or to turn around (http://wWw.a ccess- boa rd.gov/a da -a ba/fin I.htm#Surfaces) f. Attached is text from an email from the City of Edina's Public Works Director.discussing their preference fora 5 -foot sidewalk width (for sidewalks that City. crews maintain) an d ample boulevard when possible: It all boils down to the expectations of service within the community and in this case now it even borders on an unsafe condition. Please remember that this piece of equipment used for snow removal has'a 55" width'. Even though we have professional snowplow drivers, that are very , good at what they do, that only gives them 2 Y2 inches on either side of their machine. This doesn't change with a 5 foot sidewalk and a 6 -8' boulevard except that the equipment doesn't fall off of a barrier curb when they are plowing snow. I would be happy to show you the equipment sometime but I really believe that the 5' width with a 1 foot strip would be an absolute minimum if we are to live up to the expectations of the community and,plow this sidewalk." Thank again for your questions and your input /interest, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952- 826 -0392 Y MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 4TV From: Ronald R. Rich [mailto:rrr @atmrcv.com] Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 5:20 PM To: 'James Hovland' Cc: 'Joanne';. Mark K. Nolan; Chad Millner Subject: _Resident Input Deadline Help. Jim: I am told residents will not be allowed to provide "input" on the "living streets" sidewalk issue after tomorrow or Tuesday ( "Speak Up Edina" says 11/20 — already passed). I also am told that no public comment will be allowed during the December 2 Council meeting vote on this issue. The City has poorly communicated and appears to have used very little meaningful data in presenting its case for sidewalks, (and its consequences) to the affected residents'so far. And the information provided on the "Speak Up" City website nowhere cites the basis for determining the "staff recommended" location criteria. Without the promised response from City staff to my questions, I will not be able to understand and share with my directly affected and angry West Shore,Drive neighbors what might otherwise be a reasonable rational behind this plan. Please see what you can do to have the information e- mailed tome by tomorrow morning. Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632_ Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952- 941 -6500 ax: 952- 941 76518 Neb:.www.atmrcv.com FYI, this is what I e- mailed Mark Nolan and copied you upon my return to the office last week: 68 Mark: Thank you for your response to my questions - I was traveling and unable attend the meetings. Sorry I missed them: So l hope you can help. As,you may recall, my concern is the process that has now lead to what appears to me to be a very unpopular plan. So I am trying to understand why the decisions were made and the information on which the decisions were based. For the Nov. 17 and 19 presentations, you promised me you would cite different studies than the one you referenced before .7 presumably studies that show majority resident support for new neighborhood sidewalks. I am most concerned because every other question relating to sidewalks in the very, survey you cited — with the exceptions of question, 150 and 47 - never show sidewalk support with more than a single digit percentage. And the questions never asked something like: "Would you be willing to support a sidewalk installed on your lawn" (regardless of who owns the right -of -way). So could you please attach (or provide a link to): 1. The presentation given at the meetings (presumably in PowerPoint) 2. The list of studies you may have referenced and a link to each indicating that Edina residents support additional neighborhood sidewalks 3. Documentation showing why a 5' spacing between the roadside and the proposed additional,5' sidewalks (a total of 10' of residential lawns) is the preferred sidewalk design. And links to the studies or reports that contain such recommendations. 4. Links to any other reports or studies helpful in understanding why sidewalks are being recommended Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952- 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com IKL IVCISkf This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. av rr", 69 Mark K. Nolan From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Monday, -November ,24, 20141:48 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW: Sidewalks d Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer •, :. 952- 826 -0443 1 -.Fax 952 - 826 -0392 r� PWrase@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 2:50 PM To: 'Marge. Fischer@heart.org' Cc:'Mark K. Nolan Subject: RE: Sidewalks Hello Marge, The December 91h meeting will be held at the Edina City. Hall starting -at 6:0013M. This is the Public Hearing meeting,for . your neighborhood reconstruction project, Country side H, as well as the Public Hearing for the other 2015 reconstruction projects including-Dewey Hill G, Prospect Knolls B and Arden Park D., At the public hearing meeting, you will be able to comment to the City Council on any component of the proposed project including the plan for sidewalks. You can access more information about the project, including the full, engineering study at the following web . link: http: / /edinamn:gov /index.php ?section = countryside h If there is any damage done to your sprinkler system, the city will make the repairs as a part of the project without any charge. We include a bid item in our project specifications in the event that private sprinkler systems are damaged during the street reconstruction work. Regarding the.large evergreen trees adjacent to Sun. Rd and the planned sidewalk, Twill come out to meet with you and show you our plans at your convenience. We may have other options to trimming such as altering the location of the sidewalk and moving it closer to the street,,or a combination of realignment, trimming and perhaps new plantings to nieet your requirements. The north side of Sun Rd has been selected as the topography is less sloping for the majority of the length of Sun road and will thus not require extensive modification to driveways, boulevard grading and the construction of retaining walls. Additionally, the existing crosswalk at Arbour Blvd, leading to the Countryside School is currently located on the north Side..of Sun Rd. Please let me know if,you have any other questions and if you would like to schedule a time for me to come out and meet with.you about the upcoming project and, to discuss the sidewalk plans in more detail. Thanks Pat 70 Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 PWrase(ZDEdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 2:04 PM To: Patrick Wrase , Subject: Fwd: Sidewalks Begin forwarded message: From: Marge Fischer <Marge.Fischer @heart.org> Date: November 17, 2014 at 1:21:43 PM CST To: "Mark K. Nolan" <MNolan @EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Sidewalks Mark, where will the December 91h public hearing be held? We were out of the city and could not attend the meeting on July 28th. Also, who pays for the relocation of our sprinkler system which is very close to Sun Road? This system was installed before we purchased the home. Our three evergreen trees at the corner of Sun Road and Amy Drive will look rather strange if the branches are trimmed one side. Will someone speak to us before this is done? Why is the north side of Sun Road recommended for the sidewalk? Is there a sidewalk map we can view? We attended a hearing regarding the 2015 Countryside construction project about a year ago -- atthat time there was no discussion of sidewalks being installed. Marge Marge Fischer Administrative Associate, Communications Midwest Affiliate 4701 W 77th Street I Minneapolis, MN 55435 Marge.fischer(a)heart.org I www.heart.orq P 952.278.7909 www.heart.org /lifelswhy my family is why D 71 .From: Mark K. Nolan lmailto :M Nolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, November 17,2014 12:47 PM To: Marge Fischer Cc: Patrick Wrase Subject: RE:,Sidewalks Ms. Fischer, Thanks for your email. The sidewalk indicated on the Sidewalk Facilities Map on Sun Rd, isrecommended by the City's approved Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan, which looks to give children and their families the opportunity to walk to school safely. Additionally, the sidewalk you are discussing (due to this recommendation) is currently part of the 2015 Countryside H reconstruction project, and is recommended for the north side of Sun Rd (which I understand is on your side.of the street). You should have received.information about this project, as well as invitation to an Open House conducted this past July 28, when these sidewalks were shown and discussed. .A public hearing is scheduled for this project on December 9, which will result in a City Council vote on the proposed improvements —you can testify at this meeting if you wish. If you have any questions about the 2015 reconstruction project, please contact Assistant City Engineer Pat Wrase (pwrase @edinamn.gov, 952 - 826 - 0443). To address your.more specific questions: City staff works with residents on any necessary relocation of underground sprinkler systems and the City pays for costs associated with removal /relocation. It does look as though some tree trimming may be necessary at the corner you refer to, but at this time staff anticipates no necessary removal of mature trees. Also, Public Works crews will be plowing the sidewalk (if installed), given that it serves as direct access to Countryside School walkways. Regarding funding: sidewalks.are not assessed to residents and are paid for out of the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (http: / /edinatnn.gov /pats fund), which cannot be used for "costs that are not directly associated with, pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Thanks again for your comment, X = Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 9527826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolanCcDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Marge Fischer rmailto:Marge.Fischer @ heart.org] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:26 AM TO Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalks My husband and I will not be able to attend the sidewalk meeting this evening. We, definitely do not want /need a sidewalk. We have an underground sprinkling system which wuld be very costly to remove /change plus large trees on the corner of our lot on Sun Road and Amy Drive. Who shovels this walk once it is installed ?? Also we have utility units bordering our property. The money would be better spent repairing the remainder of Tracy Avenue and other Edina streets. Margaret and Jerry Fischer, 5805 Amy Drive, Edina, MN. Phone: 952 -935- 9470. Marge Fischer Administrative Associate, Communications 72 Midwest Affiliate 4701 W 77th, Street, I Minneapolis, MN 55435 Marge.fischer(fteart.org I www.heart.org P 952.278.7909 www.heart.org/lifeiswhy r ay faMoHy is why 73 Mark K. Nolan From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:48 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW: Thank You Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -04431 Fax 952 -826 -0392 PWrase@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov • .., p ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:38 AM To: 'Dean Danielson' Subject: RE: Thank You Hello Dean, It was a pleasure to meet you at the Sidewalk Facilities meeting on Monday night. Thank you for attending and for providing your verbal and written comments on the process. If you need any other information regarding the Edina Sidewalk Facilities Plan or any other Engineering department project, please contact me at your convenience. Thank You, Pat City Engineer Patrick Wrase, Assistant Ci En 9 F3 "' 952 - 826 -04431 Fax 952 -826 -0392 PWrasera?EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Dean Danielson [ mailto:deandanielson @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 5:58 PM To: Patrick Wrase Subject: Thank You Hi Pat: We met last night at the presentation on Sidewalks at the Public Works building. I appreciated your presentation, thoughtful responses to questions and overall receptivity to citizen involvement and query. If you have any questions or comments, please call my cell phone at: 952.457.9488 or e-mail reply, whichever is most convenient for you. Warm regards and keep looking UP! 74 - Dean Dean Danielson deandanielsongp,mail.com Cell: 952.457.9488 Luke 10:27 This message may contain confidential and / or restricted information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive thi's for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. This information should only be forwarded or distributed on a "need to know basis.' If you have received this message in error, please advise me immediately by reply e -mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. 75 Mark K. Nolan From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:49 PM To: Mark'K. Nolan Subject: FW: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 PWrase @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning; Raising Families & Doing, Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Thursday, November 20, 20143:57 PM To:'Paul and Deb Hanson' Subject: RE: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane Hello Paul and Deb, The plans for the Birchcrest A Neighborhood project have not yet been prepared. For a 2017 project, we will not,begin to work on the preliminary design until the fall of 2016 and final design would occur after the City Council,approves of and orders the. project, typically at a late November, early December of 2016 meeting. With regardssto the sidewalk along Hansen Road, if the Sidewalk Facilities Plan.is approved as it currently stands, we would plan to include this sidewalk within the construction plans for the Birchcrest A project in in 2017. Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952- 826 -0443 Fax 952- 826 -0392 PWrase @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Paul and Deb Hanson [mailto:paulanddeb @me.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20,201412:19 PM To: Patrick Wrase Subject: Re: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane Thanks Patrick for the information. Can you tell me, does the 2017 Project area " Birchcrest A Neighborhood Roadway Construction Improvement No:: BA -425" plan, include adding a sidewalk down Hansen.Road all the way to W 60th St.? On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Patrick Wrase <PWrase @EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > Good Morning Paul and Deb, > I have attached the draft Sidewalk Plan map to this email. Also, here is a link to the:agenda item from last Mondays City Council Meeting where you can read.the details about the sidewalk plan, including the sidewalk map: . httP:Hedinamn.gov /edinafiles /files/ City% 20Council% 205taff Yo2OReports /110314_CC_Meeting /Item %20VI_ %20B_ %20P ublic% 20Hearing_ Sidewalk%2OFacilities %2OMap.pdf 76 > As you can see from the map, there are sidewalks included for the Wyman bridge and also Hanson Rd and Valley View Rd adjacent to Maddox Lane. • With.respect to the upcoming informational meetings, the meetings were • scheduled for the four quadrants of Edina created by Highways 100.and • 62. Your'location on Maddox would place you in the northwest quadrant • of the,city. You are welcome to attend any of the meetings as similar • information will be shared at each of the meetings. Here is a link to • more`information on the upcoming sidewalk meeting 'at the "Speak Up • Edina" website: • http:Hspeakuoedina.org/ discussions /sidewalk - facilities -map Please let me know if you have any other questions... > Thanks > Pat > Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer > 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 > PWrase @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov > ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: Paul and Deb Hanson [mailto:paulanddeb @me.coml • Sent: Thursday, ,November 06, 2014 5:04 PM • To: Patrick Wrase • Subject: Re: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane > Thank you for your feedback Pa trick..After monitoring traffic on my own for the last two days, even 1509 sounds high. However, with the threshold being 500, there should be. sidewalks that cross the Wyman bridge as well a few other streets around here. Could you clarify for me what areas are included in the designations of southwest, southeast, northwest and northeast Edina? We want to make sure we go to the right meeting. > Thanks again. > On Nov 6,;2014, at 3:20 PM, Patrick Wrase <PWrase @ Edina MN.gov> wrote: >> Hello Paul and Deb, I left a voicemail for Deanne Dubbs this morning that provided the traffic counts specific to Maddox Lane. The last traffic count undertaken for Maddox took, place in 2009, just to the east of the Wyman intersection and counted an average.6f•1509 vehicles per day with an 85th Percentile speed of 29.8 miles per hour. According to the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan, sidewalks are recommended whenever the traffic count is greater than 500 vehicles per day. >> It will not be possible to have. another traffic count conducted on Maddox until the spring of 2015. The monitoring equipment is not reliable when the temperature drops below 50 degrees as the counting tubes are not able .to_be adequately fastened to the street surface. However, it is unlikely that the vehicle counts have dropped significantly. Typically-we document increases in traffic volumes when comparing traffic counts over multiple years. I will discuss your request for a revised traffic count.for Maddox Lane with the Edina Traffic Safety Coordinator. »Also, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you about upcoming neighborhood informational meetings.to learn more details about the City of Edina Sidewalk Facilities Plan. The meetings will be held at the following times and locations: 77 >> Nov. 17, 2014 from 6- 8'p.m. 1. NW Edina..- Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview SquareJdina, MN 55436 >> 2. SW Edina = Edina Public Works Multi- Purpose Room, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina MN 55439 >> Nov. 19, 2014 from 6 -8 p.m. 3. NE.Edina - Edina City Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 . >> 4. SE Edina - Edina Public Works Multi- Purpose Room,.7450 Metro Blvd, Edina MN 55439 >> Thank You, >> Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 >> PWrase @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov, >> ...For Living, Learning, Raising _Families & Doing Business >> - - - -- Original Message - - - -- - From: Paul and Deb Hanson [mailto:paulanddeb @me.comj >> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 201410:27 AM >> To: Patrick Wrase >> Cc: Jeanne dubbs. Subject: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane >> I have been informed by DeAnne Dubbs that you are the person that can initiate traffic monitoring for our two block section .of.our street. It is important that we get the proper traffic count as the current count used by the Edina planning commission is incorrect as it included Valley View Road and Normandale Rd. I have monitored the traffic myself in the last`couple of days and find that the nunriber of 1,700 - 2,600 cars per day is significantly overstated. This count -is one of the reasons why the planning commission is recommending that a sidewalk be put on the two block street of Maddox Lane. They are also saying people speed up to 38 mph which we find almost impossible based on the fact that there are a.sharpiturns at each end of Maddox Lane not to mention.a cross intersection at Wyman in the middle of the two block street. Traffic monitor'ing devices will be extremely important in getting the right information for determining the need for a sidewalk. The City Council has delayed a decision on sidewalks until the Dec. city council meeting so there is urgency in getting this done. >> Thank you in advance for your assistance. > < Sidewalk _Facilities_CompPlan.pdf> 78 Mark K: Nolan From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:51 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane Attachments: Sidewalk _Facilities_CompPlan.pdf Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 =0392 PWrase@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Friday, November 07, 201411:20 AM To:'Paul and Deb Hanson' Subject: RE: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane Good Morning Paul and Deb, I have attached the draft Sidewalk Plan map to this email. Also, here is a link to,-the agenda item from last Mondays City Council Meeting where you can read the details about the sidewalk plan, including;the sidewalk map: http:Hedinamn.gov /edinafiles /files/ City% 20Council% 2OStaff •2ORepprts /110314_CC_Meeting /Item %20VI_ %20B_%20P ublic %20Hearing_ Sidewalk %2OFacilities %2OMap.pdf As you can see from the map, there are sidewalks included for the Wyman bridge and also Hanson Rd and Valley View . Rd adjacent to Maddox Lane. With respect to the upcoming informational meetings, the meetings were scheduled for the four quadrants of Edina created by Highways 100 and 62. Your location on Maddox would place you in the northwest quadrant of the city. You are welcome to attend any of the meetings as similar information will be shared at each of the meetings. Here is a link to more information on the upcoming sidewalk meeting at the "Speak Up Edina" website: http: / /speakupedina.org /discussions /sidewalk - facilities -map Please let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks 'Pat Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952- 826 -0443 1 Fax 952- 826 -0392 PWrase @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Paul and Deb Hanson [mailto:paulanddeb @me.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 5:04 PM 79 To: Patrick Wrase Subject: Re: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane Thank you for your feedback Patrick. After monitoring traffic on my own for the last two days, even 1509 sounds high. However, with the threshold being 500, there should be sidewalks that cross the Wyman bridge as well a few.other streets around here. Could you clarify for me what areas are included in the designations of southwest, southeast, northwest and northeast Edina? We want to make sure we go to the right meeting. Thanks again. On Nov 6, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Patrick Wrase <PWrase @EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > Hello Paul and Deb, > I left a voicemail for Deanne Dubbs this morning that provided the traffic counts specific to Maddox Lane. The last traffic count undertaken for Maddox took place in 2009, just to the east of the Wyman intersection and counted an average of 1509 vehicles per day with an 85th Percentile speed of 29.8 miles per hour. According to the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan, sidewalks are recommended whenever the traffic count is greater than 500 vehicles per day. > It will not be possible to have another traffic count conducted on Maddox until the spring of 2015. The monitoring equipment is not reliable when the temperature drops below 50 degrees as the counting tubes are not able to be adequately fastened to the street surface. However, it is unlikely that the vehicle counts have dropped significantly. Typically we document increases in traffic volumes when comparing traffic counts over multiple years. I will discuss your request for a revised traffic count for Maddox Lane with the Edina Traffic Safety Coordinator. > Also, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you about upcoming neighborhood informational meetings to learn more details about the City of Edina Sidewalk Facilities Plan. The meetings will be held at the following times and locations: > Nov. 17, 2014 from 6 -8 p.m. > 1. NW Edina _ Edina Senior Center, 5280 Grandview Square, Edina, MN 55436 > 2. SW Edina - Edina Public Works Multi- Purpose Room, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina MN 55439 > > Nov. 19, 2014 from 6 -8 p.m. > 3. NE Edina - Edina City Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424• > 4. SE Edina - Edina Public Works Multi- Purpose Room, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina MN 55439 > Thank You, > Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer > 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 > PWrase @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov > ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business > - - - -- Original Message---- - > From: Paul and Deb Hanson [mailto:paulanddeb @me.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 201410:27 AM > To: Patrick Wrase > Cc: deanne dubbs > Subject: Traffic measuring devices for Maddox Lane > I have been informed by DeAnne Dubbs that you are the person that can initiate traffic monitoring for our two block section of our street. It is important that we get the proper traffic count as the current count used by the Edina planning commission is incorrect as it included Valley View Road and Normandale Rd. I have monitored the traffic myself in the 80 last couple of days and find that the number of 1,700-2,600 cars per day is significantly.overstated. This count.is one of the reasons why'the.plan'ning commission is recommending that a sidewalk be put on the two block streaof Maddox Lane. They are also saying people speed up to 38 mph which we find almost impossible based on the fact that there are -- a sharp turns at each end of Maddox Lane not to mention a cross intersection at Wyman in the middle of the two block street. Traffic monitoring devices will be extremely important in getting;the right information for determining the need for a sidewalk: The City Council has delayed 'a decision on sidewalks until the.Dec. city council meeting solhere is urgency in getting this done. > Thank ..you in advance for your assistance. 81. 11/24/2014 _ ANA. tNn. dt Sidewalk Facilities Map Goals for Public Input Meetings Comprehensive Plan Amendment Quadrant Public Input Meetings November 17 & 19, 2014 - -- - wvw.Ed1naMN.9av tNn. dt Goals for Public Input Meetings • Receive input and answer questions from residents about the Sidewalk Facilities Plan • Focus on your quadrant • '; , -��f • Small -group discussions • Get written comments if possible • Share comments /notes with City Council (public hearing is closed �P 9 ) r �* vnvv.EdnaMN.gu 11/24/2014 woN� \L4 04 /1N Sidewalk Facilities Map/ Comprehensives Plan Amendment: Timeline • Jul. 1 — City Council members request an updated Sidewalk Facilities Map be amended into the Comprehensive Plan • Sep. 3 — Draft Sidewalk Facilities Map presented to Living Streets Advisory Group for input • Sep. 18 — Draft Sidewalk Facilities Map recommended for approval by Edina Transportation Commission • Oct. 3 — Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) — EdinaMN.gov C9�1tL MM a ;f� \ 04 /1N Sidewalk Facilities Map / Comprehensive Na Plan Amendment: Timeline • Oct. 22 — Planning Commission public hearing and approval of proposed amendment • Nov. 3 — City Council public hearing for proposed amendment • Nov. 17 & 19 — Four quadrant public input meetings held • Dec. 2 — City Council vote on Comprehensive Plan Amendment • 60 -day review processes (required by Metropolitan Council) — EdinaMN.gov 11/24/2014 q�NA. lt! CCLrt CONF PUo�i0A1\ Schedule for Sidewalk Installation Input Into Development of Sidewalk Map • Comprehensive Plan is a long -range planning document: • Members of the public (Comprehensive Planning) 20 -30 year planning horizon • Boards and Commissions (ETC, Planning Commission) • Sidewalks constructed Y • Living Streets Advisory Group over this long- range — Members of various Boards & Commissions period 4 • Internal Living Streets Group — City staff (engineering, planning, public works, police, fire, parks • Sidewalks typically built _ ,,,,,,= , & rec, communications) when streets are reconstructed • Members of the public • City Council vxnv.EtllnaMN.gov 9tiNA' r� CI177 OUF 1cID)VA/A Schedule for Sidewalk Installation • Comprehensive Plan is a long -range planning document: 20 -30 year planning horizon • Sidewalks constructed Y over this long- range period 4 • Sidewalks typically built _ ,,,,,,= , when streets are reconstructed Some sidewalks may be installed as stand -alone projects mm.EdlnaMN.gov 11/24/2014 4 W�ll1� �vQ�/'1GI• Sidewalk Cost Considerations "° 9 • Edina residents are not assessed for sidewalk costs (PACS Fund, State -Aid funds, grants) • Studies show that sidewalks do not decrease property values* • Currently, public works crews maintain sidewalks at schools and on State -Aid roadways • Sidewalks on residential streets are built on City right -of- Varies 17'2-way Driving lane way, not on private property Varies i� — .EdlnaMN.gov 11/24/2014 4 �vQ�/'1GI• • r Qk a =:; yy Sidewalk and Street Placement in R.O.W. 7' Parking Min 5' Min 5' Varies 17'2-way Driving lane lane boulevard sidewalk � Varies i� z Q t n f 24' – 27" Roadway Width 60' Typlcal right of way QParking: None, one or both sides of the street, depending on context © Sidewalk required on local streets when certain criteria are met. vmw.EdineMN.gov 11/24/2014 4 Sidewalk and Street Placement in R.O.W. BOULEVARD WARES) BOULEVARD (VANES) 6 BIDEWALK a BOULEVARD W TRAVELJPARKM LINO 1 .1 TRA.. LANE BOULEVARD MARIES) . BOULEVARD (VAMP) BOULEVARD CVAFNEO) BOULEVARD (VANES) W SIDEWALK 37 TRAVEL/PARK94O LANE W BOULEVARD 7' PARKM LANE I• TRAVEL LANE BOULEVARD (NAMES) BOULEVARD (YAFW-B) W EXMWQ STREET 27- PROPOSED STREET W EXISTING STREET 24' PROPOSED STREET &Y RKMT-OF—WAY 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY —EdinaMN.gov Cfrur W (ON RM011t A\ Approved Living Streets Policy 0 Sidewalks required: • "on all arterial and collector streets" • Uwhere streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park" F �j r . 11/24/2014 5 Legend —=--, RYCi .... . . City d Edina ffid,"F- - Ild 2008 Comprehenstwe Plan Update r ,k __., . I 11/24/2014 5 Sidewalk Facilities Map • Sidewalks required: • At public schools, public buildings, parks • On both sides of minor arterials • On at least one side of collectors • As required by zoning code or plan approval • Context criteria i.i. t.eyeed —Flute -.•• Fwn .... Reve .... Have .... Fwln_ 6i.0 �JiN. •aYV aatln pry SN�AY CneY D eaRlsao. wdw Tne Ctly of Edina siewTaIt FedNiu 2000 Compiehenslve Plan Update FG -7.10 Context Criteria • Recommended by Active (Safe) Routes -; .�: �.:. a I , r r,. to School Plan r � �=- _ ,... .1�.����,�; ; � :.;,,;fi • Park/commercial destination' ; ® 7' J' • Average daily traffic ;'r r greater then 500 vehicles • 85th percentile speed greater than 30 mph legend —u.. -- - -FUn .... •eo.amn ••••FNU,. .... sNm 9WraYt Sm.W ®LeY .Ory•IaYYY Nia NAY OeeY mmm�esna wy.mnr CRY of Edina 6ldwralk FaWidn 2000 Comlplenslw Plan Update Fpun 7.to 11/24/2014 Sidewalk Facilities Map: Key Points 20 -30 year plan • Side of street to be determined later by studies, input • Streets without sidewalks on Map can still be considered for sidewalks in future • Boulevard width /sidewalk , location can vary depending on impacts (trees, slope, etc.) CITY OF EDINA Context • History of crashes involving pedestrians • Transit • ps • Logical connection between destinations • • r sight lines, Street • • th less than 27 feet 1 �utiu �• 0 o°o Rare. . Rata. R�ra nnm NNEENNIMEMEEME eta tantarr�t���r..�.F�� ANNEEMENNE me- NEW MME ate. tarsaari. . rar�� •ae IN tar �� _ tsetata!ra eta . w .� •R��ta .� ...�. araa�e••Pr�•r�a raMEN. . ��. rare - ��e Sidewalk Facilities Map: Key Points 20 -30 year plan • Side of street to be determined later by studies, input • Streets without sidewalks on Map can still be considered for sidewalks in future • Boulevard width /sidewalk , location can vary depending on impacts (trees, slope, etc.) CHY of Eduu 7108 Compn #ensin Plan Update Sid-aft F -111d. ---.. 11/24/2014 7 1 �utiu �• CHY of Eduu 7108 Compn #ensin Plan Update Sid-aft F -111d. ---.. 11/24/2014 7 r Sidewalk Facilities Map: Key Points • Based on approved City policy • Comprehensive Plan (1998, 2008) • Living Streets Policy • Active Routes to School Plan • Supports a citywide pedestrian network that is data - driven • Responds to residents' desire for increased pedestrian facilities • Quality of Life Surveys (2011, 2013) • Park & Recreation Survey (2014) l,i: al `r', ; -Ij U—d '•� ••�•�•.� -- Re'arean -� -� wemnu Coy o/Edlm 7008 CompmhenaM Plan UpdM Wdeoala Facllidea 11/24/2014 (c fl tr , Orru IJ INI /A 9�N�1t e p: Questions / Discussion •,� GY _ = � _ O 1 - , a .r - - w .EdlnaMN.gw 11/24/2014 11/24/2014 ' e 6 Highland School Ovr`V 9 Sidewalk Facilities ; </. Lake �; ° Map 1 Good aeStuoarit - Future State -Aid Method st MM Sidewalks ,�•A•. School • Funding: Combination � of MSA and PACS J Funds Future Active Routes -- Mud Lake to School Sidewalks - - „,e`, Colonial Fi � m ' Funding: PACS Funds __ , -� '�� "Church Station ��' -.: N�A���c :o::::__._ Creek valley .ti4 Future City Sidewalks • Funding: PACS Funds Legend _BtlIDry .... Fian .... Fwn .... Fin .... We T�.�. ads ��•�.4 ID 9NFaI5i&nah Ra1NW TM www.EtllnaMN.gov Sidewalk Facilities Map Meeting ;r Northeast Edina � Council Chambers Nov. 19, 2014 6 -8pm d t a t NAME ADDRESS 1 V f1f �� L/ ��/%//�/��i t✓ i� 2 — y ':�- ! *- 3 _ 5 k), W ao S -'1 Z CA1LI i1� 7 t46 k ✓Y1 �, 1 d tl Id�91,aGAx ,a VC 8 ,,5 /r� 10 1 lc- 0 �- 13 1 VV1 I v�f'T (D I' ��1 P . 14 P) .) i�l 5a®Y hzce 17 r 18 DI- I�+1J7 C Lai O-A �lZA t1 AI 19 ,eVL4 I ej U �' �� ULA- 16 20 L L 062-r- 211 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 d t a t Name & Add Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet � I G L" O t - Y G!-/, Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: . What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? �cG'tih.a'�Z; `J G v TO 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? r r� f'�- `:.,P�- - l�rt�� -�u P�x�• - CcJ s � �S � �?-� G -�.-.� 5. Other y%zJ W-_V . .Ah- v ✓P4.�i�c �� 2c�—y --�j 'C 7 i L ,v r.-cJ �.,fc.tii � o r.J ��-.�� ••Z��..c�i�c? �.� i �`•� - Oit,�Q;l�C�e�'�b a r ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 w9tNAr o e >4 0 Sidew'alk Facilities Map Comment Sheet 0 iA crz WV�S t_yl A! 0 C,- 8(-ik Name & Address Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long-range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20-30 years? L 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20-30 years? 'U— - 2 X A-A U11; (), �VA _' �'� 141"_' 9,; 1 vf (i LU('IC_ (I'(- 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20-30 years? ?k1 , - '-q-, I �( 0 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ;ti . _a - - 11 , P, 1j,(e CA_�61 �jk_j J'j Ai& S. Other 'C=n o j z' (I ."e U., j- z ...... ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard 9 Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address_ Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 1+ iS ICS /N 1 ocA C +4 r%, arty F d,•N e 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? �7A fy rr n r m ,4 ce + C:,Gt o w W 5 Co Al &mnv s KYm +mil ce 4� PG Pa'— C� P ?five-:k p ti ccesc 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? pa rte/ i•j 4. Aside from sidewalks, what - improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? r2 `�l� i r-- r) tw arw� ''ice i - 4s-ii.( 5 i��,,c�,{ 5 o v77' S. �0ther 14.1— "R S�g.,� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaAW.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Otheri c�►'� ��� �� - [i, r 7 :,fir 1 N , 0A `1- - CL l f v6 ! �� .' , c CA/ &_ diig-J-41) 1) J��'11 r,;z �• -icy T a I y rr ! :� I "/, i J V ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Q�,1�1�J �cJ U � °� �L C) (D I Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What's your vision for. pe strian transportation needs over the.ne*t 20 -30 years?i I ;, ; .O�. -- hrt,1k.w I _Q L _ (!c �t tit�� � C .5 w /> -,Q jJ 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address ` 7t)y14 C" r z �— l0 <; 0A1?L(-RW4V Ac//C- Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? S l hWA -L-I&I VN Fi_ S I D 4, o mac, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? Nu 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? kJV 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other CS 1trl " €"\j A/(. i M't#L.1 F I'/'f ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaNW.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 ' w9tNA' �1 0 e v Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address 'j o [: ' � Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City?. 5. Other l \rZ7n !' ���rJ)r�� /2i7+.w') L"�L71�^N /� �i�% � "�: "�/°- e7C./Zt- 'l.`-rn%/ L✓�7,-r�n /i�Zy,rT".. � / (-' :/�.0 .f7^G /L1 � G7/1.0'LL ✓ /J.1 c�� ' �C /'V Yf �� L�y L}-�% i3LL�t � �/ u ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaNW.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Ok Pi C�,;• �t:1 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address ... j 'ZI e.i Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what im rovements could the. City make to improve the walkability of the City? p f� a F Lr- 4, A ; < P ft iw� 1 y2.) i 11" n a d i3a,r1V �- ENGINEERING . 5. Other t DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 ok e 0 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long-range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20-30 years? 001n _ pedestrian oL 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20-30 years? 3. Are tre facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map,that should not be included the next 20-30 years? ex he i /7 0, 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other V ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard 9 Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 o Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address V ►n 0 Pf ji c iz/ Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is your vision for Pedestrian transportation needs � ; � ver the next 20 -30 years? i �i l,b � �i� a�►e � � �,�- ., na ✓n:�X, .c Cow (AC, e yi K�t�v d.r��i f�ai ^C Gt'+' H d�,;� ��'ev►"� - �ura� :K l% _l ,41/ 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facili 'es on the Si/d�ewraOWcilities Map that should not be included over the next 20- 0 years? T—V— j) e, h 1117e ✓ � � WG T /j t, � !� 1.✓ �I es l � �J G �'C'�d ut T � 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov 9 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 �,OSl`7A. �1 ok a 0 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet c Name & Address GiQ - /2�c ova Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? C./� 7 U1d C �i• �JZ �� �i�� �2.� L��� 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map•_that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? cl� L - 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the Ci make to improve the walkabili of the City? it P tY tY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 e Fax 952- 826 -0392 fn v �0 •'dro4a"Eo •^�D Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address �J C ��, � � C g U 7 S W -/ s i S7- Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers 'The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? :.�ave.�lt'►vty� �c; �' cl� GtJ�a,�f:� 7J; �e r'a✓�c� 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? /_U I I d ^C. vCa I -► Gl LD J4 1 < ll�� s Me 3. Are there`facilit'ies on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? C. o11 < <'' fC -1 c.k-t 6Q,2 6L I'm j ej � /[j e G� C V-6:5 -S A C S 5. Other /11 4ccc t/oN' �� �' C ►C: ! G� S / r� /� ✓ [�E Lm ✓ r` le i T ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 w9tNArj. o�e J �o Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & AddressV re j �� C n n orsz Meeting Location: Northeast Edina, Council Chambers The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I : Wh t is your vision for pedes rian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? "43 r SV iv C (21'01.,. T ' 41ajl r� Mm(')W 2u lle - nly? /f'Zgi t ?inin7 ��P[a rGcn in l-aRSfINCiNSO IFS 2. km there facilities mi from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3: Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? Mcxe: O/MCC+iorlS 4-0 e(�A &'ic,nc 60MM4tiae &.P 4. 'de from sidew�aallks, h t improvgments could the City make to �mprove the waJkability of the City? �� 0 - t'% 5. Other 3> '. m"Moat pg4j ",I MC G(ge,l' F�J�� � r4'e�ll • �r rc �4 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalks Facilities Map Edina Northeast Quadrant Meeting Resident questions and comments City Hall, Nov. 19, 2014 1. Concerned about tree impacts. 2. What is the average ROW width? 3. Halifax was assessed for sidewalk a few years ago. Was assessment policy changed? Can city refund? 4. What is the plan for bicycles on a 24' wide street design? 5. What are the criteria for narrowing streets? 6. What is the life cycle of a road? 7. How were the 27' & 24' street widths chosen? 8. Is safety the primary reason for adding sidewalks? 9. What % does the State pay for State Aid routes? - 10. Are State Aid routes dependent on State schedule? 11. Is there dedicated money for State Aid walks specifically? 12. If State Aid funds run out how are walks paid for? 13. Most of the walks on the plan make sense because of high traffic but I question the walk on Beard Ave. 14. We have always been fine walking in the road to Strachauer Park. 15. Explain the difference between Arterial and Collector streets. 16. Is there anything in the plan addressing speeding? Will design slow traffic? 17. Against narrowing streets because it is already congested especially when there are garbage trucks. 18. What is the minimum width for a parking lane? Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northeast Quadrant Meeting 19. If there is no walk planned will parking be allowed on both sides of the street and will roads be narrowed? 20. : Comment to group to be proactive to council before decisions are made. 21. Narrow roads will hurt property values. 22. Does 60th & York reconstruction project area have plans for walk? 23.. If a walk is not on plan and is petitioned will there be an assessment? 24. Would like example photos of new walks posted online. Include meandering walks that avoid conflicts. 25. Walk on France between 54th & Hwy 62 is in poor shape. Concerned that if city can't maintain they shouldn't add one across the street. Resident does want walks, just wants them maintained. Uses alternate routes to avoid bad sidewalk. 26. What is city position on maintaining all walks? 27. If another resident is not clearing their walk what is the procedure to enforce? 28. Concerned that Xerxes walk was not updated with new road construction last summer. 29. The 50th & France business.district pays for walk maintenance. Would like the new walk on Halifax to be included. 30. The new walk on Halifax is a very poor product, worst new walk ever seen. 31. When new walks are imminent will residents be included in design process? 32. Would like clarification on policy. Are all walks to parks definite? Even if road is local with low traffic? 33. Another comment to talk to council about your preferences. 34. Comment that the Beard Ave walk was resident driven initially. 35. What is timeline for 60th by Parnell Ave? 36. If one has a wide street and a new walk is planned will only one side of the street be shifted? Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northeast Quadrant Meeting 37. What are the criteria for replacing existing old curb on new projects? Does not like the aesthetics when curb is replaced piecemeal. 38. Now that curbs are not assessed they seem to be non - negotiable. Are walks negotiable? 39. 60th street is busy. Will walks be on both sides? Will road be narrower? Concern with trees but want walk. 40. 60th is a straight shot with high speeds. Look at traffic calming. 41. Bruce Ave in Arden Park project does not need walk. Heavy traffic on 50th causing delays for cars is more of a problem. Would like to see the final design for Bruce Ave. 42. The walk on Minnehaha Blvd by Arden Park is very long and many trees maybe impacted. Too expensive for the benefit. 43. 60th street has design issues with topography. How is this dealt with? Would like walk but concerned about trees. 44. Agree, want walk on 60th 45. What are State Aid street width requirements? 46. In favor of walks and narrowing streets on 48th & 49th streets. 47. With all of the teardown construction on Halifax how can we restrict parking to one side? 48. Explain the speed greater than 85% criteria for walks. 49. What is the timeline for the plan? 50. Live in Strachauer Park neighborhood and would like to walk to Southdale. Would like Hospital to add walk so we don't have to cross France twice. 51. Why is it so important to the city to add curb when there is no problem with current design? Sidewalk Facilities Map Meeting Northwest Edina Edina Senior Center Nov. 17, 2014 6 -8pm h NAME ADDRESS C& n t -e y Q` A6 4 5 �a3 GOc' 2 Q d 5 �-. S 1 o8 GIPN tir%� PK s Sir muso 2 ev 7 rm 8 S' 0--q 9 0aff:Y+ 8� Nd �s317 I OOX SAN E 10 e/��� p�b�s 53 rbM�nb (�Nr. 11 d8 ,.�v 12 13 �' SZZs D 14 - 15 5� C1 16 rrG A p 17 .0 V e A �Y e Cu•e 1s eL Zp f �,, c 1� Lf 19 20 . 21 � GC V t E J ^^, 6 6J a/�/t�- /� 22 A,4 t> 12, IJ 6L/L-, cj 1 C,r 23 ) C. ,Eli %✓t.S v ,�l S :Z e/ L a e %-1 L O 24 CCOL C) f % 25 26 J Lav " AIA vl-t ' (2D UL vL R- Tc L� SG 2 2 Jg•�c�'^ 28 �'< l� "�' �a�r' 'Cw� 29 2 30 L513 44% h Sidewalk Facilities Map Meeting Northwest Edina Edina Senior Center. Nov. 17, 2014 6 -8pm NAME ADDRESS 1 V' e Jtw [ << 2 4 s H u s 3o�c p3�✓ 5 E'SSAJ D0 rei-W pd�,�' 7 i5 `ttk SD q / cL 8 9 Gt, l,c, I le •/ Saul ki 6 0 tk ! -t S. S 3 G 101 ' K Ivlre�e 11 (o y"s L oq6 6f0 L✓V1 V (C- -Vv 12 �l/� NNE V, d '6 4v 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Name & Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other s ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 PROPOSED SIDEWALK GLENGARRY PKWY NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THIS STREET FACING HIGHLANDS PARK Glengarry Pkwy is a nature setting. Very little traffic. See no kids using it to walk to school, It is not a destination to anything as park activities are serviced by parking lot and people dropping children off on park side where they run into the park. I think a sidewalk and boulevard would be obstructive for them. We already have shrubs and trees along the Parkway. The street has very little traffic and is used by dog owners and their dogs on 10+ ft leashes — often two people and two dogs. They would not fit on a sidewalk and a boulevard would be obstructive for them. MY CONCERNS ARE: 1: Underground utilities (sewer, water, gas) connections from street Construction equipment could damage or weaken connections Homeowner Underground irrigation systems and nozzles are in place 2: There are 9 driveways backing up to the street — A sidewalk could not be contigous and would look weird as well as the change in grade across the various driveway materials. would be hazardous walking 3: Sidewalk would create more hardscape allowing water to run into storm sewers instead of soaking in ground. This has already been diminished by new homes which have added expanded and turnaround driveways. 4: Not in character of park and homes facing the park. Loss of privacy and would ruin the. park and natural setting for which we chose our. location. 5: Burdens homeowners with responsibility for keeping sidewalks clear of ice and snow and the resulting liability. Using ice melt and salt damages lawns and landscapes creating additional chemical use of weed poisons — Glengarry is used extensively for walking dogs. Their chewing grass and sniffing out their treasure would get sickened and their paws sore from the weed killers and winter salt run off. Additionally, on the residential side, their urine would kill lawns and plantings. Grace McNeill 5400 Glengarry Parkway — Homeowner 40 years Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address . 'tf o e-. Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center q The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What Y our f r pedestrian transportation eeds over to next 20 -30 years? ! C. 1 L'ut_� tJC u;t 1� VLF G` v 7. ( h-"� 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilitie on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should pot be included over the next 20 -30 years? C. ,A c i f -)/ t-O>' I, 1A cc C'1 r�4 Lek 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other "T'`.� a�- 'i (�'�v1 .�,1 ti1i \ic' J ,> �` 2 1i1 I u1/.S v� l�v -t V'X ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 /2--Z Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: _ 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -/30 years? .Z -4r r 1Z A S'ri' t,10( k S 1 - r ci 7Y A-(' / k,'- _� v -_)" a h ti r / c IjfC . f i c- r .4 t--E h o va � � 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Flap that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? (114, 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? _4 V'G %rr�lGi��c2� 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City 5. Other" ( 08 Gvl1 Fs, -� Ci 66 Y t-1 oe, J4 to improve the walkability of the City? /9-7a QM C�c„ V' Y i_, aDlik, -fr i (;C_J-0#V-a c- , . b k G(,Y 6✓G�rcrFK Or ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Pax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address.: " c Meeting Location: Northwest E ma, Edina Seni r Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Add Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center /L rV The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your v sion for a stria tran o ion needs ov r the ext 20 -30 ears 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map BOVIVI E A/oRLI; ?"nent Sheet Name & Address' (A)lq L L Y NOR L A A/,D CR , 5317 MOD oX SANE Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please,share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? &JE 60N'T Ste 41V y AIEW PEbC -S T P-1 AAA 7,OANSPoRT4770N C14AN6-65 OR Ne-&Ds f'o/z -rH4T ~7ME W6 MV67 L1VE4 ON. MADDox 1-h NC- Fog 37 yEAFS AND 6J6 '77-1/NI< lT 1,1�cG >3E UrV�f/�I�VG �1�, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? tie AND oup- me 1 cusoR s oA/ mA pDoX 1_AAI6 ARGAP T AMRE OF ANy IMPROVEMC —ALTS NECESsl,4R y 'To IMPROVE W,'4LKA811_1Ty 5. Other RESP01VS1611-17_y E663- /Y)Rln17-A/AlG S11)E04Lk�s DIXPVC 1H6 G) I N T Eg Lk) J LL Fl}L` OP0 N J-�LpC-Ie Ly A�OM-e oIJnl ER6 (iN MRN y C�0,6s) AND .MAy W&Z-L NG D to Be DQAJ E 4V 7716 CTY AT C-X PENSE OF ALL RESIDCIUTS , ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment. Sheet S� r kd � - L +Name &Address L., �s� � Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 36 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? �� mL� ►-�^ -1 lC�.n � ��i 5.�. -� d��� C l.�r� T` 11 �"i �rFi �, 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? CL r vim. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name &Address \74�vv1. K.-..`,t ..� —'ffdD L, (n.e �� S /..• 0 - 4 Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.eov • 952- 826 -0371 9 Pax 952- 826 -0392 � „�e.a ����� �� � ` � � • � ' Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment -Sheet Name & Address N /,/` y /V<0'V6N -5-2I40 A�f94 j OX. A/C Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? MAA A rn,)( CA.vt 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other • Sy IW / C PGAA I 17- 41&i£A ACS Yoy 44C .4A1T1 C! PA rZ, Tom{ 4 yrrQI(y C 46.6' OF &ES16drn17t a S /GN /Fic,9.v9'�r D�p,o E 7Truscy ~4& Mo,eE • 1nP /�i4T' C� X21 TE �ls4 -bo YDU Lae 'O be al -b € 1 4wr_& S /GF D£ 7;yL- S� 7r! Pv? �¢t� SSG €tnrA�K W*9T ARE /Yi4.4< F6e 96_"1ooeX ff UA1Q*r0_8 .e R£ AA-4221VIX ? 72A,0C eour -4 foRQE' %d'Yd-/ t Tv move- Av&- * 5i14 6yY1440t VpAkdrp ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 AS pct 7;kpfF;--1 4 Icc �S i I�HT 2"9TAW • T�€ 'Fos awl MAN l$ ON I-Y P'�6-S IQEAvrS or E' Ivor s/oe.ITS Tff�2a�,v ©uT? di�1Ti�{ �N'GY� dEST,Q/ �N AGE -/.66 473 � O C.- % nez Si' DTs ,a /�' 7�ys y Arc Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address_ b—,9,0 � � / C f7O l /D Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? GmyL &drmnjc, �do u�c� 5�,� u5 nu ✓ 5 iU-n '� fNo / .J.ue, 4a, 44-1 ao - ,?o Ali (ter x, urn /au e& 3 11444 7 2. Are theremissing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? /YD 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? - S—CL ,zb a L& Cep- �i�iiougR to ►�' d �?� aav�', �. r�u�,�.c.�. fiPr�i. � 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? .56V�u .n " a a J_"A 'I-.w f. D A in n i . 1 l�Lt I d La of l I Ill n (t '/ 5 ut c, i's '_ "P_A t9ua L,) xI1c t a4LL S Y ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.¢ov.952- 926 -0371 • Fax (A7- R7F -n197 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address 1J to 12 ,AA I b k y i eA Meeting Location: Northwest. Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is your vision for pede trian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? I' 1e 6 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? r W-00 S. Other Yel a AA 4Q.1'd'�/�"'r �C�•G� &L / AA A- . i � ,� Q 7450 Metro Boulevard- Edina,l0ii9 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address TT l- f 00 C, ff Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? fl( C'7� S L3 !— vjso d 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what rovements 4ould tha<Qty make to i ove the walkability of the City? S. OtherU/ ®` Pep /47 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.eov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address D A X5.5- y J�O��� Q�,41-s Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center 2:; q vv/F The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a. long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestn�g tr nsportation needs over the n xt 20 -3 years? , d� �h E 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map hat sho Id be included over I/ZiU s.i /]/._. !�i/JL/AA,A /r Il/.� �i /t :1 ink AI/- 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk F cilities, Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 ears? s OA-) !- hl4 �a ni <i " / /, 'Ldp /isZ ;/J 1/' /r A/%le- IY` � -141n 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371. Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address c� JS 71� Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center 149. r5bojo 15_51 56 The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? ya D�Crf arc rNe _t5'1 1D LvS _ Zw 41,fS aJ&(Z-- / o f 065 T ryAlA V t:5 0, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? �:� 5rpi✓ct� S�iz -°r Q `T �2�✓�1.oZZ uyz =�Y�3r u i V OR S4f:t—Tr-P 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? YZr5 , TkZ- cL t�, A 1267 Z-Arr ,/4t &'5 6v,z-.j 7 oAl tt � , fti 6�&-T',Y ri V !&V Aq_ 0 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? `w (OZ- A) S u, —r s 5. Other ('li'�w I5 P`Z- 12So�"Sh PRo�' Jul 1/�C[2�1,P�t%I Y) /V7 J)DtM14 -IIJ /- C 0AJ31QU/Y7t_W ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.eov • 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I, What is your vision for pedestrian trapsportation needs over the next 20 -30 ye,�r�? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the,walkability of the City? — 'W6ArV_ `{�i DJYz& r/y�p_ 41)y , d►� CSI/' j �: a . I IN, MIs - i � ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371. Fax 952- 826 -0392 Name & Address Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet �� — id k Meeting Location: orthwest / n Edinavr, Edina �rr�� Senior Celnter '-. ( / U ) 7�4- The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from Sid Iks, vyhat improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? )/V I�' e_:�I%•1 I_ -I 6�I1 l�T- �. 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name .& Address !�c/�Y� L %ILL Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missi g from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be incl ed/6ver the next 20 -30 years? �! O �P X4 / S s (A/ 64 1- C !G 3. Are the Rfacilities on lities Map that §I ould WL! 7" lc-s over 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? sl�C;1111�L��S' • . . 5. Other <�L -� S� c�%`��L� i�/ t� G /-157 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? / louaeis / ♦ • OP6, P PLOW MA 41 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? :L^ 04- 1nvv4► �-o t�n.rcrc•Us( uKJ}s vANA tovyq&6, wm- e -a, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address- i+r�[�, pua, 57a y 74A& ,e c Lm- Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? oaf,.. ., .,Jd .1.. ,J.. A, .u_. &.1—A _ ....J. _ -1 U[. _ WOA JW_ 2. Are there cilities missing from the Sidewalk acilities ap that should be included over the nex�070 . 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that sh Id not be included over the next 20 -30 years? vcr�rx,�►' 5-o a. �,. _ — — �el�,� c, clams 4a� 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? WM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address— Y\Yx_�-Y\4_o_ 6;,Q, kasi Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedes ian transpoortation needs over the next 20 -30 ears? �y '� sr' 0� �� h V'C. -0 V\ q\ E. C� j Qom• M ; `mac v-1m (i'R � � �l'-e �- t � v�. �. ; o` l C,.nr e�L � !�'�r� �.. c� cn \.�.� � � � .► c JM-�Q � _ 2. Ar there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4-u vy\� \:)�wH l " -k'n ~ra N kw-- 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other - U'VV% \j k V yr 'NV,,L- A-0-a - �c 10 -- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.E.dinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address ,J? %` Wp , .s;z Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks; what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. (ON Other +l P(I ��� C KC Eft} OF r crcy ,s No� Imp -0Q7 J I �s,� Re G IvE lA/PU -(. 37 .4M EY-7fJ FH8Y Ott K 4figPt� ,A)O Uv L�_ 5 N U W fKUM PLv w5 rs RF- 1) tL�, L vP fvgztt(=X zftd-L) pIJSSI�L� r0e X 517 75 To CLrkp? -HIS SA)0U -) mccr,vrcy fir, c�� S fV rn ��� +� S�� O D�/ mpf- pg ifs -CN - lJ @J iP ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . DL�,�1 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 � ��1" �V �� FF1 G 1, www - 826 -0392 EdinaN�N.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 P►! �i . r�iY % A! l ,7 rL.� -rte . r -..... s A , -� , � [ I ^ „ r1 . J e - ./e111 -! A,n i No.-( v C,OUIJ PO bN 60 F- Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address S t a �W Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What J's your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 ears? [-L(0 Q Ate; �'[�► r ,t i .d)s r' IM A C 1 11 P tit C: r*s i IZA ^A y IN \3 \ AJ f 2. ke there f cilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities M p that should be incl ded -over the next 20 -30 years? L 3. Are there faciliti s on the Sidewalk Facilities Map hat shou d not be included over thq n t 20 -30 ye r ? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what i provements could the City mike to improve the alkability of the City? 5. Other A C ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 . �etlTO it i.VP - •r Gt �? - : ALL- cunlrysid. ��_ �n� .. Element, Schaet `O � �� S • o_ ry CounTrysidr PH � " r q �,,, t� d R d 7 r �ro� � � - ttir, o. f�• P °vr,ts �wti Fpr Im.�� � � t„ `lover Rkt�� r t s rrerl'n ttuntcrS! 1 yr� I W 61 Sl 5t T` n=y�►� �.�ti ; 'f '' "r 9�J chcr�shAr Rd rb rL 111clesl Ln� Wymari Ave. Bndg s! dr Niodd } , 1 �-� Tf�py Ave. t a - M Rer�`�� Crosstown Hwy CL r �n Cresc y. K ti's 63rd St ;IONIK - ITI ^ 4 'µv+� w1rt1 g kve f, p �. Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address _/_ C l #44/< _0'y / -5 Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? &i a firs 42,i.L Io� S 1� o T ya�tE �- A/Grf -v'� �% �if� ti Ox Ci►e� -� eft"Vc.d CA /3-% VW�r v1 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years! -e!r' it J- 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other -5'1 �p"4v:16 SZ't� )46 ie&''o '/kLA' -e �Gcr�t �)kp 4 de- 4-eJo 0 Ve— 24A, W-V G'Y� '-s'uV'Uz ft- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L( 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 r -Qe,-cw hills Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address S b o jc&A B 4 tl r.64/ Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? ./aw �'6 r ,E�i<ia/Q- 'B�ts i �`? • ,5 - o /s. S Y:t= /!/a'1 b""C14 cete z rJQ lks �/i J ��`� CB- ,x±e f - Sc�+► -i.e caJ�Co�c� 2. Are thee facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? ra 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sid walks, what improvements could the City make to improve the wal bility of the City? cf; X qq o / e< i, jA DA d_ -) e t/, ;aw /VAPi_ V A /i. Sal it /.- e . _Z c r j- %!.c Li..'�- 11n .rte 01 v itp ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address - O(Anne, Dubs 6-3116 /1/kjju'-,C LQ.h-c" Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 7he.r6 ; s no need -',% our- now oy^ ;n 20-3n vrs SiefecJ�rfiC. U1, hVe in au-e -s ahoy acres of hnuses 'thCve. i s n.or a. desti(ta+,on t-o W alk to, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? ?u t sA+aalks u)here, 1-ho resideat5 a:P S aY Ala EcO:nt. .G�v -Nic y wwit - Hiern, cl ,j% of Maddox Lane, res;der,fs do not Lja,nt cL s;deijn(Ic 9)n a, Street, 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? tn&Adv,X l..a,kie, ;s hot'eu 12opular 0,ijkinq strut. Aes;deds do. not Wall: ©Ver- i-6ic, "ma" (3riAge, - there—is rLo des+na,'i-,oh ro oalk fo in th-e, neiGjhborhood on eAh-ev sia(-e oi-- +h�. Be'. dCae• Pega1f, wajk'%V%A i n `f-ht, B;rrk c.y'esf neiu h6or henr-I are' jus+" --Lt -�w a-wA (l: &nct geoeml(� ca.Veid AMcldoxlrcivtG beaeuse of �o m@r�y Cet�S. �un+laer a'Fea�s dces nnt" 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ¢quo, +e. wA-6 +N.AVnbe r- of ped eAr ; A n s. —z S. Other • (Iie- sick u ,dk5 cwe, yx or �re e . lflev cave bui ({- wit °1 Theve- is a, ( XLLQe to S- 60 d t4,e.m rj ( 1,jnY L/. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.eov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 D Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Q . 'Ll ler o b. S { Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? \j It Q-WA, l C S at V_ 0 � ilee% 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? IV0 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other �t%OGl ULl� I U U Gt�t? G O lvl V«Q0� 1. jP D C Y-e S tS w 'a 0'0- f 1 's v\r X I. rah Lt'k is ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.eov - 952 -826 -0371 9 Fax 952- 826 -0392 In RW7. Name & Address b V, Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet b P_ VA cE_-(I I ' Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center W The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 8632 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4,A_ C)9RO 5LP> 77a Oej 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? l 5. Others P of ire A,7 A1fS17 A_ r % �c� eh l !' I'd— d-re'�n a d_ l'u' ©,Ogosee6 z Mo- O r .t?.. it/OC4 %Q ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov. 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 C� V �1���^ �-- �tS�t x&12 --- , � . t►•� � �-' �'�i+o� ` �.� � � j�ii✓� �� z. Name & Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet im 'Mo- -11 ON, n 946� Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? �._.__ r hood -- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address SYLK C' mar IS °N �- sao� GIeN��r�y Pkwy, Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? N®-+- i5 a$lms ,. a/ .�} csfgein i C x-00. voM =a tact ° Flort�t+/an�l�leasc.l%vy /V:,ri'A �u� °�e`S�c -- r1 I VY;, 1' CQkeS / s' f'f'�e oN lY � iG11 �Y'TI/Ci��iC �oNr✓eC�m i 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? e 4N yes N3 S �c w-'M 1N T-,Q ry rve`3L u0 — Kee® V a lY'�c OT JOi'�lP D 1` �ps'P {VPiS p y �vc{.5,. 1'009 5. Other LApfQv fll ,la,d Mr�c�le �'I�ei �b�i�f c,,'14 c73% 4jele -r)t '''i 0. deb. res wea e V Iu `F- K& 4. I _ 1- • P -,rk Of eS Yu- f0Te, be eNcI KIea{ ar. ,kwq rnC r -• • -1 1 P a r y� �Spalr� T� 2 Cb,S`� 6Y rgh�e,� -ol.l ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 'Ilk� Sidewalk Facilities Map I Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: Q 1. HIV t is our vision for pedestrian transportation needs over then xt 20 -30 years i ) �I n_ ��9Y Sri-1° -scar A=, A-w t _ =7 t' J 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? . it •. -1) -) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 .1 Mih� �^fuL tn0 e at -skis vru�i,��( ou�c 6d r��ntibers u Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address 1 52z� vl� Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: � Lv� 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on t e Sidewal acilities MaF,, �hat sho I not i cluded ov r the next 20 -30 years? .S1��.1 ��C` I7i+ 61. Q�C nD 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make t9 improve the walkability of the City? �� I .ar, +4► r� ��.� a a,l� .1.� ry.,Ll� . nYb95� Sidewalk ,Facilities Map Comment Sheet Rid- -ti r Name & Address i [ (� - r 7 , 6--V /, 0 0 Nk-, & Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center�� The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian ... 0 _ _ /) _ n - -" _ ir. _" over the next 20 -30 years? r 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMNx7ov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 R� Sidewalk Facilities, Map Comment Sheet Name & Address V VF 1 V WA l L4 AM A Meeting Location: Northwest Edina, Edina Senior Center The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: ` 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? ... a - I #A - ��&Jtq i1m, 'coJ I lot+ lv*^ 2. P*ee facilities missin�the k Facil ities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 ears? 4: 0, F1 T 3. Are tqere facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years. 4. Aside from 5. Other to 6�p� y %fake to improve the walkability of the City? C� v ( m �w 'Amo �S iALEERING DEPARTMENT Re evard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.eov.952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 j %R. ,,,Pf r ng" uml.-2/ S 64 Mtqfs w4.o ucc -Nt G+� lrjLw ilov- tv reeds +o b ..Wasp ` o�--N� �kva2Q'er'r6 ova �r o,,a Mk�rw�s�'rvWeo' dio °+J.t1� 'fo hr A a.11a +wi� i�� A-&I �I � Sidewalks Facilities Map Edina Northwest Quadrant Meeting Resident questions and comments Senior Center, Nov. 17, 2014 1. Was a questionnaire done soliciting feedback when the 1999 Comp Plan was revised, but none for this update? Staff did not know if one was done for the 1999 Comp Plan, but one was not done for this update. 2. Because maintenance of sidewalks will fall only on those residents on the side of street where the sidewalk is, it will be a disproportionate cost to them; sidewalks are typically 4 -5 ft. wide; what happens if he shovels only a small section in the middle? Believe the code is to shovel edge to edge. 3. On corner property and snowplow pushes snow after already shoveled; staff noted boulevard -style sidewalk will help to keep snow at bay; mentioned the amount of snowfall last year; staff noted that they are looking at what the cost would be to have Public Works staff do maintenance. 4. When will the sidewalk go in on Maddox Lane? Staff said when the road is scheduled for reconstruction and residents would be notified at least two years in advance; on Valley View Roads, snowplow throws snow at least 10 ft. 5. Hard to give input when they do not know who is going to maintain sidewalk. Staff noted: that prior to installation each sidewalk would have its own public hearing for more input. 6. Surveyed his neighbors and 90% do not want sidewalk; lived here 51 years and only one minor accident; guarantee more accidents with pedestrians and bikers on sidewalk; disappointed because they went through this in Highlands; what part of 90% don't you understand? City Council voted for neighborhood to not have sidewalk and it is on the map again; staff noted that they look at different criteria — connection to parks, schools, etc. and they should not preclude planning for it 20 -30 years out because current residents are not in favor. 7. Regarding Maddox Lane, would a petition against sidewalk have any effect? Yes, said staff; however, vehicle count is at least 1,500. 8. On Glengarry, 1 out of 10 is in favor of sidewalk and this should carry a lot of weight; slow down the cars —this is the biggest safety issue. 9. On Arden Ave, putting in sidewalk, narrowing street, limiting parking to one side — this is going backwards; doing this for less impervious surface said staff. Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting 10. How are you working with the neighborhood associations? Staff said they were notified (recognized associations) plus Next Door. 11. No notice or mailing received on Maddox Lane; should have done mailings; staff noted mailing cost would have been substantial. 12. Sidewalks are a safety issue? Yes said staff. Look at railroad derailment instead because she lives-close to the railroad and derailment are becoming frequent; also look at bus services and lack of access to light rail; don't understand priority. 13. How many times has the City Council reverse its decision because residents did not want sidewalk? Staff said at least a couple times since he's been with the City. Do the comments tonight hold the same weight as Speak Up, Edina!? Yes said staff. 14. What is most effective way to get their message across? Staff said tonight's meeting; email /attend City Council and ETC meetings. 15. Example of Highlands Neighborhood where they petitioned the City Council and had 93% signed petition and City Council listened and did not approve the sidewalk; need to become involved and attend council meetings; upset to see it still on plan for 20 -30 years; people still will not want it. 16. Adopted park on Glengarry Pkwy; there are neighborhood associations that are recognized by the City; recommended that residents organized their association and use this as their vehicle. 17. Didn't have sidewalk back then _and Council did not push things; have to be organized now otherwise they miss what Council is doing; all the work being done before first asking; cramming things down their throats; lived without Living Streets. 18. Valley View Rd sidewalk residents petitioned the Council and it was not approved and now it is back on the map; .how many knows how streets are rated? You need to learn; not criteria met on his street; put in because of volume and speed so he asked for data; made a deal for crosswalk instead of sidewalk; crash data is not on Valley View; traffic correlates with church events; the devil is in the detail; statistic shows best way to get kids to school is by school bus, followed by parents driving them; sidewalks and walking are most dangerous. 19. What is the meaning of 85th percentile? 85% of vehicles are driving at the posted speed limit and 15% above. 20. Her neighborhood does not have 'destination;' there are no pedestrians walking; why not build in high density /commercial areas; why do you keep going back to neighborhoods where they don't want sidewalk; give the Speak Up, Edina! people their sidewalk. 2 Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting 21. How do you count pedestrians? Staff said cameras are used but not all streets are counted; why build sidewalks if you know there aren't any pedestrians? Staff said pedestrian data not gathered in all cases but vehicle data is available. 22. Story about a pedestrian crossing at the library mid -block (jaywalking) and swore at driver like the driver was doing something wrong; there was a time when pedestrians were to be aware of vehicles and now it's the drivers who has to be aware of pedestrians; need to educate pedestrians as well; staff said Living Streets has an educational component. 23. Disappointed that City Council was not in attendance; staff was sent into the lions' den; remember this when you vote next time because they are shoving this down our throats. 24. Understood that City Council is seeking input but the presentation sounds like a sales pitch with perfectly placed family in photo; don't ignore the bigger picture; staff said the presentation was meant to show how they developed the map. 25. Why isn't the City Council in attendance? 26. What is the timeline for installation? Staff said installation would be with road reconstruction most often. 27. Send survey to entire city so that you gather information all at once; seem splintered now; staff noted Quality of Life survey data and a survey done by Park & Recreation where respondents were favorable towards pedestrian network improvements. 28. Lived here since 2009 and have not seen any of these surveys; how are your voices heard if you do not know about these surveys? Staff said residents are randomly picked. 29. Commutes by bike and prefer to ride on street to avoid the up /down of sidewalks; concerned that narrowing of roads will make it difficult; have you considered painting bike lanes? Staff said yes and streets with bike lanes would not be narrowed to the same degree as other streets. 30. 10% year resident; Highlands is a unique neighborhood; City Council visited when their streets were to be reconstructed and saw how residents live, greeting each other; streets are wide.but not in favor of sidewalk; do traffic calming. 31. People losing sight that this is a 20 -30 year plan; recognize that you live in the city, not the country; traffic volume is up; lives in the Highlands neighborhood and is in favor of sidewalk because of livability and bringing neighbors together. 32. Why not have the neighborhood associations solicit this information? 3 Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting 33. Seem like a rush to judgment; not everyone is getting involved; surveys done are not scientific; need representative number; non- computer users are left out; seem like world is going to end if right decision isn't made in Dec.; many retired folks whose voices are not being heard; he is not anti - sidewalk but they should go where they fit; no one knew PACS fund was being considered, just happened; staff said the Dec. decision is for staff to be able to construct sidewalks with 2015 roadway projects. 34. In 20 -30 years neighborhood will still be the same ( Maddox La) — no destination; what will change? Walking to grocery store 1.5 mile away? If doing this would take a direct route instead of where cars go. 35. Would you work with homeowners to regrade driveways and would it be at their expense? Yes, but it would not be homeowners expense. 36. How do you treat trees and landscaping? Work around trees or look at side of street with less impacts, said staff; 37. How about utility poles? Work around them or they can be moved said staff. 38. Have not talked about cost; just received notice today that property tax increase 8.9 %; unnecessary things being done; City Council seem to think residents' money is theirs for frivolous things; uses Vernon Ave sidewalk to Jerry's but do not want frivolous things; and now spending $100,000 to study lid over TH -100; not in touch with reality. 39. Do not insult us that sidewalks are free because everyone pays one way or another and now you're promising to maintain; be open and honest about cost. 40. Living Streets is to limit impervious surfaces but you're laying done sidewalk; goes against your goal 41. Has anyone studied demographics and decline in 25 years? Will be a ghost town of elderly and no replacement of generation, e.g. of Greece, Japan; most of Edina is over 65 years old; staff said the Met Council is looking into this. 42. There are 80 million millennials to buy houses and they want sidewalks; runs at 5:30 a.m. and prefer to run on sidewalk; lives on West Shore where most do not want sidewalk; stopped riding her bike after moving to Edina; has three boys and would like them ride their bike. 43. People look at their budget and then pick a neighborhood based on what they want to do, e.g. if you want to walk to shopping you pick Country Club; people want to preserve their choice of neighborhood. 4 Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting 44. Need $1.5m to live in Country Club; most young people move here because of the school district. " 45. A vote was called by a raise of hands — majority opposed; about 6 were in favor (42 residents signed in). 46. What is the life expectancy of sidewalk? Staff said about 50 years. 47. • People are often in favor of sidewalk as long as it is not their street or their side of the street; could affect people's livability by changing ambiance /feel of neighborhood and cause people to move. 48. People do not want to look a piece of concrete all day or shovel; could be expensive and taxes are rising on people with fixed income. 49. Thanked staff for the work; there are different perspective and respect opinions; is a single mother with two kids; runs on sidewalk on Vernon Ave but is not in favor of neighborhood sidewalks; plan does not seem thought thru; could not do this in her business; putting sidewalks where not necessary, no destination; happy to have taxes go to where being used properly but do not see value in this plan; places burden on younger families as well; in favor of sidewalk in certain place. 50. Mayor Hovland arrived and they called for a vote again to demonstrate to him that most were not in favor of sidewalks. Sidewalk Facilities Map Meeting Southeast Edina Public Works and Park Maintenance Nov. 19, 2014 6 -8pm NAME ADDRESS 1 AN I �TRoSkY �I�D y - �G t6✓N 2 ED AaD SHo2C a2. 31 i A t- J3 e L 0.16 r7001 k/, S)Jo r f- a C. 4 SUS GP(f - S OU L-E- x'132 LA W- Sl+dt2F (Z . 5 6 u AA� 14011 4 CSC► !"4Ul . S ►J1' 7-2-2- Dct�(c,QcQ LW ( CSC 7 S� GA._ i� � � S�1 -b A 11 U rr v y�Q c 7 '�3 3, © R 12 k b64— 'q Zit/L 4f-71-7 1.C) S1 `V K 14 Ci `C 6f L -e 15 ICL=V c.v tv Lei Z-Z -T 9e, �, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sidewalk Facilities Map Meeting Southeast Edina Public Works and Park Maintenance Nov. 19, 2014 6 -8pm 11" � NAME ADDRESS 2 3 A('Ll HO zWXA, -j 5 h (1--e �l 7 8 0 0 9 J�X X325 /� 10 /%'1 7 013 11 AOL -- -7 11 7 ws5 {1c/ns �- -7 r 1 -7 Lv S 3 JrCJ 14 ° 7 y 15 , % -2o/ oA e- c ,�, 2 A&,ET 16 LZ-LAti Q 65yI w'R P,SCX V� 17 bees I 1 e ev— b b ZA �,r-- 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 11" � F-)5 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address 701"V I✓E %3vL -Dl cL ` %d0 1 /1 o r (!I- DI ' Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian tran 0 needs over the next 20 -30 years? LI 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that shouldn not be included over the next 20 -30[/ ye rs? ,( /1 / ti --C 4�►nr t lr�/ %JLe2 /� . d�7 �` �7 V Rrtc1 fU SG/IOD /� �il/� �/ fe__ b Utr-PSn,f C allne� 5 wy G,�a.' �D %D"- '(✓ra..._ � Svc t) r �A .�� ,aAf�l:�avri'c. C1h,�.,1, l, r R r jw 0 ,,e j lrrl �lGw� d%� � / /�ye are q.jjej hoc. S44C 4'-:� /�' 'Y'ou av �a1r� ; 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. OtherPfn1� i7� r�� r 1 LCLrn nni 'Rcain.�f QL� �fhc.1a�q!/1ar Gtrn 1 r�Ccin�f � 5 , / / J�% h --i- /'j /. / -..�._ - e it , _ _4 n , _i _ -j �a : r, A A.A. d..�.4 �: <- n -A- " aP / - rI ( I'd /1/(!/ R'nfAiV.. ' /n /_ /I Pc A& z4l -A)- v e- n 4o u5h %,01 r (X'k wo wl,/ nod k nfi j� e )20- e ble M c A On ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 w EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 0371 •Fax 952 - 826 -0392 �z ENGINEERING DEPARTMRNT A o e co 0 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address— Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long-range planning document. Please share your input with us: I. What is Your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20-30 Years? 0 r it) All 0 f 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20-30 years? ( t -;e r -C A 'r) v WeL h 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20-30 years? NO 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 7. /1'L3 i')el , e.ti 4V r? Fl_ � P- e i i rr)/ell eD b /_1' 0 S. Other i. tv�_. pltja'� j.? 10 v'_" C.� L !A 41 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard * Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov a. 952-826-0371 -1 Fax 952-826-0392 vl" r 6 I J, .'1 � -1 . e, c?M-fi, tv, UV 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard * Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov a. 952-826-0371 -1 Fax 952-826-0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: . What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? ��� 115�tr0 Co 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov. 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 wgiNA'l�lr �1 ok a Cn Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 10 W�l ♦/ I' / I// I _ I� CGS Cl1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ���� / /�� 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 !� www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? Pw _ 51 huvo Ih akAd a {f 0e) oil OJ Vd I vfew Vq /b �t 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Faci ities Map that should be i eluded over the next 20 -30 years? N vvsl 5ftacl R6 M vbiug I D6f) IS A /Y6r_ 1'41SS'11V6- I i/Vr__ F'b4 Pity -Sc- ph,. R' J f,) S�-Lt � ►%ta m r SE' 6-d /Vra� 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? i-i° S I hA I'Y7 of 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other Q✓ _ U l� 1'l IS.SUe rd / j2i rr am SS) S 0mir CCPS:S l_4 NE Af w 1:_�- i� ✓ �sl �r�� S E LSibVr1-S �11 o SE omes -- I- r06 �s ode h _- D�� S0" "-S � (1(� oy r V o, ate- yLhs- S off, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address °�Qi1(!i,9 T�lc,r�ii �.5 vryt ZZI n:�t Ida mn Abe Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? r D6� a4' ?O i' I d ��.M i� nvi,rrir i � c`rir �c;�_� �,� 624 w1 ' i ,W- .rhao't (x.61 _ &,P1coc k , g[ ,I, 'A.T.) Erqna� Vri d'o-I'l UjQ;4f P- W of- (rn ii -764h k, Ztt-i kzi NICE a ,7A011 i14.1 l%Ut 1, � g rz p-e — , Qa lI YI ( UA edit �— el`?IYIU "� Cf, �1 l�.0 I�ZC �Q1l�Z�IZ�. 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over Ath next 20 -30 years? & 0(11_10 AAA n4p.1,10 L_ es- K& the 4. ,Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? � WI i `act iE?cik k CCc Chi I' Jjt�_ PA 0 kHOc�A 1,2 �� i s c. e�� 5. Other INO OIU iY1OVW6L f"e All u VI G1rk71r1 l I- lI eA/� r � v+ - w ry w.1 ALUIaLVAAI.r�v v • 7Je- ow-wi1 • rdA 7J4- 0ao -VJ7L ` tD 0-0 < (RaLdll LO JaKc RMUCU4A)2"o Thy w d hs C doX VkaiV�l Y? 5kv� kYLAQ\L ° a.6ortt re.rng t- reIa"4 �riuec,�aa�� t�xi�`(�(.rn� n`ef-dininO waVo a�C s � Yoko�,,�n,, ��n-T n Ir�',t°• who Clld f wkct I b&&-iDp pp te �i� b canr� 4wt wl�ct -�6r�- n�.�-�i `✓lf G/all� �- t� -f2ao 4 o4h 0, �Lt -t �cw ct 0 � (J �ha.{— c�6out �ueccvtc^,c_ ram, siv�ee Itc�(�i`lr� wlll 6e MGt¢c�6e� t�rt+YOwr� .strati �urnAA[Q de uReiz(.Q �o �° -�i0� � �'�"g cauuet a b� pv6tffm. c 0 �RByo TV Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next.,20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ,n® r gI ELM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov.952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address W32. w 3hoft 'i)c Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? n► ��. � � S � ty S Ir`y t fir- cn,-Ts' is •� LaT- w wed << r o p wr � o, F w S kd,,4 &•� 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? - Al& at-0^6 r r Ad_a- - va.,r%-Xw4 F S 1L i'd�st ,r :1 *f 6�s� as 7o y- 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? T-t cr, c s bA 1n I�.ck,_e_ r e.., 5. Other - T� .. s i/t d1ti Ail ✓Ytwi L of v J n. w lv� i S (/ti % ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov.952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet, Name & Address Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities cluded over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? Lz 4. Aside fro sidewalks, whaJmprovefnents could the, City m�k to improve the wal ability of the, C I -- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 w9tNAr�l. �1 ow a:, .sy Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address, \ J� ctolo & Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us:,. 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? ►� v� f -� L., - ten" n e kA, . f 4�� we' 1 It,11i*y' i` a 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities-Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other Fn ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov.952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 �1 o e �y Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address �n 1r 11 1'j � 'q ye v,_J L "e �v �-1 �' W e 5T �� � ►-; v Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? w ra; :., A se 1 C 1 s ; d � u_Aw < TO e.v N_: u, ,: A % 1 go-,7t, .S AV a CUL Ck Q? I 04 A S Am- AG U _KS 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? C45"'v.e Cr ALL PAV/< S SeLejrd < Ra-rA,I bvi I-p r S �3 e l La y Cb Aj - 7 c� s c� G i vss C La 1y � vZ 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? � � rvrri ' S.a� C�vvu.ua 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ii'Joye 144 (),,d ; ()d Lo Jr -Liu -�'o C'r i ,►i bi',, 2UVTe, S S. Other % Q I►� 1 L-/ C9 �-�. v �-/ e, LA& O Pe 0,a ea s c I AA�" 1< L/C:)CA ' -•vL Riouv 4 j AAAa Lk-27+ S--i, v;<� +o L,-,' 5 ,' 1, YU 4Q,, A A. U L �� NQA en/7 "2 1 -0 L 1-Ps nniS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Name &Address— Meeting Location: Soutl Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet X7121 -fie �� Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? SINE 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? ;!;;%D i 141 eoIi Pi W r•nf Lie- Y 1.5cr2i:F Airy rte. /a r1C2 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? S. Other �j L A::7017— IV 1i/ ,CV-41 lV C �ir w l3� �/ui4a c ie -3) a-1 r7 U TlH c f/G,rs9-6 GR.� L f5 //l/�"cJ�c G ✓� Ct�/aG{ a Oi •. I` 2 �% Al A S 4,,' r C'[. -L /i? AS re., �l�L /G L ( 'g'e "' I/ qti` Y I S 6� m4p>r 45 l� i/ k'raL !1 1l,; i ¢.:tl =h e. Ptye7,sn. f ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance M-1 The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: L What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? �'rv(y �„i� �i� 7�. /�J'7aG•'P� -� O � %�fd�� .S f7�c� �/S Gi,/, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Side alk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? !' /011 V eWaa � 3. A there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20- 0 years? /SSf 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? SJCJ "✓ �� Gr/ I G( 6,4 v✓l G12 ? - 1 $' Q �1re gf 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdiiiaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 1 4�9tNArrrlr •,vu'bgrowe Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address �� ly )F TIC 1?S Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? IJC !V u 'r r 011�NG 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? -T- 13') ,V" .r � h L i t (/ R' 04 k L /9 w M )2 t; d v i!? i= S /3 X I J &_ '_,14 L J -- .- 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the. City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other e'` :'mil C "V 7 4 l=!=!G Toe ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 A, Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address 01 Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other WAS- Sore- 41 I S N O,i liter /-\,i- C A- i J 00 % 1&-e — 0 2 e ��► S c�� �k `S��1s hair e- LX, lu.'e.r W ( ,J D+ ! h.22e a t e- e u-� S 6(dlins oktj 10 4�' . /- rvq.A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 _•oZN���lr. Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address JERRY L, ?NJ6 7325 OA k t A -) jQ AVE, Meeting Location- Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? f 11 —,r .._., A o e, o r 5 ' � a 1 � �7 v1 (M � S T r oo y S .� � S �- ' c� 7 b A e L z, 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -3 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other Corte I f .(5 (ii r Tai. . ,`� 4i� (� 4�ur ✓1 j� r (%H !9 N + V% A 4V- Ci.l �' � r�L �+ �, I F- C r V• � (mot S Y12 . [ "� h 7�r W � . � o�d[` • Thar¢ ,.g ;16 "f or.1014< � �r� -% � �v ✓ �.6 u 1-� �' �J } ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 tVg�t��A '�Ir P e � Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Addres4 p`iet J Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestri i transpo ati n nrds over the next -30 years? ? ze-jv 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? Ah 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov - 952 - 826 -0371 - Fax 952- 826 -0392 W9tNA, �1 >+ �y Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address�Um >1n��/ `7353 00k e,, 4t l t, Meeting Location: Southeast Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 11 1. JWhat is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? : L l� '; 1 Gt.^a( CI r'i,..J �t VY. M.�'l�l./'i�/' -r L� li,l�./ . ?(JC T %O Jn i•n. r. 414" a e'A''V*4 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Fa 'lities Map that should not be included ov /r the next 20-.30 years? �C,9, l .� V/Lo i �nnri ii�LWt�ll 3Y1J o" �1 w. in C� �' Iv�l SrIP' eft . "1^� �Lt7'•S�S I,, r 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 1�� �II r� �1�2.Jr�r' IGiS ,,.,�Z.4 c.t.w� �zl�- bt�.,3 ?• c� �� -a'� "� Sf�rv� t =v��r� 6�,rL� c',� i � � S U`er L•� t.r.. S i �� t,u.c � � � . � t,� �c`i'ri � (3 �2� �h �z C'i n '[� n P � '.��Q �/e h 1 t lfs' ' ? • 5 ysnx �� 6 V v 5. Other Klf� �' a °'��PW� �b (e G 1 1 /r� "p-0 ( l �- (� i ' L. �- ,; 1 l�61 h ' '1 h .�`(/.Mi:f "�i ) T l 'G�iilt� J1/k'I c•f I o� �r<d �lG: ? ���ln I^'!f C_� %G�,iiV•Zr(i �Si ?! {y �Ul�l,('L G1/� GGIG1.lL,.Y�%rl (�2��r� a /� /Nt� '� �^� J �� �(tw, �� �,. Ls `•C.. "�( t9 r� � MS), 1-'J 5'bew (DrY+'V_e6� ��f -�+l✓� 5 )iYVVCl V �J'r II ) ! r� ff�G/ f Wl(l l sc 7) �fi�44 LJ�zb} /V0 yl ,CIS .j�S� Sf'rt\ i�f �s1�i' tVd4EISJ: -- C 1,,� 0� G, V0;1YLAa(7 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov a 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Side WQIk- Fr-c-; 1,'Ile-s NIap Corvimer,+ Shy' --e't A/an,Ne. een N`�IsarL % //7 lJes� Sho4'eiv� pre;, p05 Pin ale, Ave- �rom 70L S F• cZll 1-1,e way Sav Y/• -h� Gi J�vr ce �� �i-al d leJvUd� � n / I �-riye TIOM 7dT S�. J�IibISG1C5 AI. �1 s� Sidewalks Facilities Map Edina Southeast Quadrant Meeting Resident questions and comments Public Works, Nov. 19, 2014 1. Already paid for Street Recon and now upset that they are assessed again through franchise monthly fees. 2. Cornelia Dr. — Don't want street narrowed, it's already repaved, what does that mean for sidewalks? Would the sidewalk wait 20 -30yrs for install? The sidewalk install would wait sometimes unless there is a petition or council directed. 3. What if a petition comes in and the sidewalk is on the facilities map does it get installed due to the school /park? Can the sidewalk be installed back of curb with the least amount of impact? 4. Overall, there's no specific timeline for sidewalk install unless there's an upcoming street recon. 5. The City surveys have never made it clear that it'd become policy if we said yes to sidewalks. We can't read everything that is mailed to us. Please make the surveys more clear and let us know if our vote is changing policy. 6. Resident read that a narrower road actually has traffic calming benefits. 7. What will happen to parking? It'd be on one side of the road right of way. 8. What about bike lanes? Are you not installing more of those? 9. What are the bike rules? Treat them like cars. 10. Survey responses say people want more sidewalks, but was there a specific question on having the sidewalk in your front yard? 11. Are.all residents surveyed? No. 12. Upset with personal addresses on survey and one of the surveys's had their name on it, so the comments couldn't be anonymous. 13. What's the makeup of the Committee? The map has been developed since 1998, 2008, ETC and other Boards and Commissions. Almost a 20yr process it's not new just enhancing the plan. Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southeast Quadrant Meeting 14. West. Shore Dr. is an Active Routes to School so it's changing to a collector street? Why is the City using Active Routes to School to push sidewalks faster? 15. Where does West Shore Dr. collect too? 16. I've lived in Edina for 15yrs and thought communication on W 70th Stand West Shore Dr. felt very informative written on website or regular email. When I called questions were answered compared to other cities I have lived in. 17. During West Shore Dr. recon a median on W 70th St and West Shore Dr. wasn't asked about until it was ready to be signed off on the plans. Communications have improved since then. 18. If no petition it'll be general life on West Shore Dr.? 19. What does changing West Shore Dr. to Active Route to School mean? It'll make it a priority due to extra funding. Don't anticipate installing sidewalk unless Council directed or it'll wait until street reconstruction. 20. Never asked for the opinion of residents on street. 21. Is there a factor that you won't force the install? If it's on the comp plan it'll be recommended unless it's unsafe. 22. Who makes the decision on the street becoming a collector? Its active routes to school. 23. Kids take the bus why do they need sidewalks? 24. Need sidewalks because it's a safety issue. I see kids try to walk to school and they were on the correct side of the street, but unless they have reflectors on it's still hard to see them., Sidewalks are the safest thing. 25. Sidewalks are ugly and bring down property values. 26. Kids do walk to school and have a legitimate right to walk to school. Walking to school kid's dropout of school less, they are happier, healthier and as adults we should be here to protect them. 27. I've seen kids who can walk to school then get dropped off by car if it's raining. 28. Enforce traffic laws of speed at 30mph and not 35mph. People drive too fast we need sidewalks. Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southeast Quadrant Meeting 29. The drivers will be more oblivious once the kids step off the sidewalk. 30. Kids are forced out into traffic without sidewalks. 31. Sidewalks will separate peds from traffic. 32. 1 have a safe community with kids walking to Cornelia on south part of West Shore Dr. Kids take the shortest route to school, so we need sidewalks on the east and west streets. (Belvidere Ln and Andover Rd) 33. Some sidewalks are great but on West Shore Dr. there's nothing that goes east /west. There's fast speed with traffic. 34. Do we have traffic volumes during time of day when kids walk to school at Noon? 35. 1 have 275' of frontage who in this room would shovel that much sidewalk? 36. I would. I lived in Duluth when it received 150" of snow and I shoveled the sidewalk. currently live at 52 "d and Xerxes Ave and I would shovel. 37. What happens when you're gone for a monthly in January? I have a neighbor who's gone for an entire winter and they hire my son to shovel their sidewalk. 38. It all comes down to maintenance. Public Works clears snow on Active School and State Aide. Council is currently asking staff to review the possibility of clearing all sidewalks and the money would possibly come from the PACS fund. 39. Survey recon 90% said they didn't want sidewalks. On Dec. 11, 2012 Council meeting discussed sidewalk down frontage rd. and council voted not to do it. We've done the survey, had the Council meeting, how many times do we have to tell you No? This plan is a vision of the future an overarching plan. 40. Do you have any ideas on-insurance rates for liability? 41. Homeowners are responsible for maintenance of cracked sidewalks? 42. What's the life of a sidewalk? 43. How much money comes in from Safe Routes to school? 44. What about narrowing sidewalk widths? 45. What's the Right of way width? Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southeast Quadrant Meeting 46. If the sidewalk was less than 5' wide I'd change my opinion. 47. Would like combination of curb and sidewalk so that there's no boulevard to mow. 48. Confusion from Oct 22 'd Planning Commission West Shore Dr. was a collector now it's an Active Route to school? 49. What's a certain walking distance from school? 50. Kids won't walk on West Shore Dr. they walk east to west. 51. West Shore Dr. was a future sidewalk now its active routes to school very confusing. 52. People show up when opposed on sidewalk, but Quality of Life survey says residents are in favor. Has the City received other emails? 53. During as Street Recon every homeowner gets to vote. During a Quality of Life or Parks survey only a few thousand residents get to vote. 54. Can PACS funds be used to survey every homeowner from US mail? 55. If the City decides in a few years to fund sidewalks, do we still have a say on the install? 56. Residents have no control. 57. If the City is doing prioritizing than the residents have no say. City Engineer makes recommendation due to safety but Council has final vote. 58. 1 live at 66th St and Warren Ave. Where are you going to put the snow, because my house is only 21' away from the road? 59. Is the City going to implement more equipment and staff to maintain sidewalks, if they do will my taxes will go up? 60. Snow removal on Oaklawn Ave used to be with graders in the past and plowed slower. 61. Concern over Oaklawn Ave north and south than West shore Dr. fear of when City is going to consider that a gateway to Fred Richards Golf Course. Sidewalk Facilities Map Meeting Southwest Edina Public Works and Park Maintenance Nov. 17, 2014 6 -8pm NAME ADDRESS 1�(� j� JJ l�� V(•2W 2 4 V-42- 5 AIV1 Coq 2-Cv V O ( I P UI'e vv 6 ,. 1' VIQ S c� ! It Cl S 0 o, P,� 7 E.5 Ike ass (� � � � n on R\ 8 C re n G s S (� l �"1 eco,, o 9 �J L20 10 - av vy 2 �/l o-e-S Pjv ` 1p % (l�' z ✓� ��/ �� �J-¢- 12 13 14 —o c� Q l- 19-\- 15 1/' jp zf C'H & OE f-) WaC 16 r< d dza /Z,- 17 _(/%c� lC� G 1214 18 �- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Mnt4 I,�� lKJ Oro( A�Ak I aY Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedeAtrian transportation needs over.0e next, - 30,yqars? O 2. Are there facilities miss'ng from the Si ewa Jc Facilities Map that sho Id be qcluded. over hen t 20 -30 years? 1 44 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from s' ewalks, hat improov�ements could the Qty make t i proveetthe w kabilit of the City? ML Ot, dQ tjd cam Saw 5. Other �� ( co -"Vj� 1 '; U tb Q ��`OYY� G �&am h UkL- 1 mA 6) 019M AI PA Mk Ii k n 0 + 66 U t It'r1 _VLW%M W_A%1V WARril�u����� 1 iil 1 _ii / I L.�l. �L . A t r/ 11104M r"�'11MM949- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map- CO S- Z - �y� _ (��� 'qS Z - 5rS7 9Y�� Comment Sheet / 6 'V61 ,�,�� �/J /N -*V6- Sa Name &Address � ` Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance �5�3 The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? �r-� L �✓.6cic oIJ c Y Gil/ Pyd 7_1C_a7f. ,Ai rGU 7�ear-=rC yg GABS 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? t2 e 7.4 ( C. — t" l &y l C.9 L c u ur -r it CGc C e,-r p l� L• 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve he walkability f the City? E '/' C� C"'.,0 SS �✓� -c/cS w17a 1-,5 -(,1-, -7 011"/ A /_'/ e_ /a V0 6 4f "7 & S S. Other �� ( K c6 ZV (e '14/Tv Y f 17' �cGCC / 5 '-1,e�2 ' Fz2/1 9GG �cs oc�� /P� C MU O�F�< <f �l�c,�Fut � CG``i �y �z .i ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address n(D C re e-k V C_I � Q.q CL � J Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other CS 1(12 (L) n U< -4 A.).ra ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 • Fax 952 -826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address OcAf-rl Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? , Ike 2. Are there ili ies missing from the Sidewalk Fa4ilities Map that should be inc uded over the next 20 -30 years? jghndd G-elL I s�. J v, `J i ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Add Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: 1. What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 826 -0371 9 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address 6b�d) e Ba-5s (o G I &,aso n Rcad 5 5) Id '5 '�A Meeting Location: Southwest lEdina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: What is your vision for pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? s oare _L 44 ,v)�, --V%e r6 51nOVAJ 0,+- e_dSA� 19,O QS �Yl tAL% c� t o W ot � k< o s A h 22. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? �ex-uA5e- off' h � �usy ��in h P 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? lib , 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? I khan k r)_c1 r_e r�`os� walks W0L" 14 kP_ , S. Other !-b 1 V, c . ri- `'l P:i1 c, mW (lam e- t G n G1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet Name & Address Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The idewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: . X0111 Vet' I . What is your vision for pe estrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? MCtp-�- -tey-y'(�L« ft C71 e. a.SCnn Iz�t - if r!vc�lGS (i[ HA le-J, fa [ v wev I" ce.. r T e.�r�a.. c e -�k : LiL. i f roe- cyu e, i ki 20 l S - 71 *1,, e c cf)lx ua e- ww 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? Cave, p t e f-e eA as a.12 toe (zrre- ex c ln 'dc.c w u. f (e4 w +0 1 OF- 7z 3 r;Q r i Ve r s Lo I tt-i of C't..r:_r v e S I7 1 t't/o h i` t r 1n 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 =30 years? 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Name & Address JKU CIA Sidewalk Facilities Map Comment Sheet kkflf Meeting Location: Southwest Edina, Public Works & Park Maintenance The Sidewalk Facilities Map is a long -range planning document. Please share your input with us: c 6w- JActo . What is your vision �for `pedestrian transportation needs over the next 20 -30 years? iD €���i�SA A�tl `� Mt�(fl(C _:W �IFS`TRcaN •A�/'1 �FnfYNTT ;Zq,jr . V4R60 -6 �t Lr)t2t?E. (.`i LrVF ,Is Dmrsegovj, An!0 _�.s F- a4M/'cE or A of 0 KDS; 36cc6pS I PC T(2(ArcS ALL 496 qtr ccVTC , Paccovf e-y� 2. Are there facilities missing from the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should be included over the next 20 -30 years? 3. Are there facilities on the Sidewalk Facilities Map that should not be included over the next 20 -30 years? E S. EKls71 Nd SioF w�t.�s' S ✓� " fEE r�v�T7aA W �IE� fr Ofw�*- 'f � ,,4✓F Nvi 4. Aside from sidewalks, what improvements could the City make to improve the walkability of the City? w) ! r (-ATd9r ueF N -Tr-z4( --4 AvE . N I fi- VC-1212"r . SPEc�6Q O-A/ . % ^E't /�E�C,9�L TTE CKC� rote- Atto 5. Other ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.eov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Sidewalks Facilities Map Edina Southwest Quadrant Meeting Resident questions and comments Public Works, Nov. 17, 2014 1. Questioning validity of new walk at south side Valley View between Gleason and Antrim since walk exists on the north side. 2. Will this Power Point be on the city's website? 3. Why are some "500 cars per day" streets not on the plan? 4. What is the time frame for future St Aid walks on plan? 5. Would like a walk on 78th St. 6. Notice a higher concentration of walks in the NE. Is this policy trying to even it up? 7. Are Active Routes to School a Priority? 8. Valley View Rd SW of Gleason. Dark and dangerous. Feel unsafe walking, jogging. Could it be a higher priority? 9. Lived here for 55 years and were told there would be no walks. Why do we need them? Are residents aware? 10. Highland resident in favor, would like Red upgraded to Blue. Neighbors support but concerned about trees. 2008 project was different time. Will there be new surveys? (told they can petition) 11. Does the current council vote on this or the newly elected council. Current. 12. Which side is the walk on for the new Valley View Rd Hairpin project? 13. When do you decide which side to put a walk on, how long does it take to decide? 14. Missing links elevate priority of a segment. M Brindle 15. Walk by High School... Counts on peds? Were students surveyed? Who maintains? 16. The system will give choice for safer walking environment and parents were asked. 17. What do you do about people who don't want walks? 18. Previous policy served motorists. We need to catch up for peds /bikes. 19. It is not fair to ask residents to clear walks. Since city clears streets they should do walks. Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southwest Quadrant Meeting 20. Does Public Works have priorities for clearing walks? 21. Bus policy for areas with no walks i.e. Indian Hills area, should connect. 22. Will 9 mile trail eliminate soccer fields? No. Will Nordic Cir parking lot be expanded /used for trail access? No 23. Is lighting considered for new walks? Will PACS cover cost? 24. Resident voicing support asked if it will be implemented. 25. Would like walk on 66th St west of Hwy 100. Very dark. 26. Lived in many cities, loved walking, would like more safe access to nearby parks, stores and restaurants. 27. Prefers privacy. Does not want walks on lot. 28. Prefers the safety of walks. Totally supports. 29. If street is rebuilt, the walk would not be as close. Mr. Nolan, This note is in response to the sidewalk plan which I happened to hear about from a neighbor, to include my street, W. 60th St west of Hwy 100. 1 watched the Nov 3 airing of this issue in full on TV and thus will not belabor the residents lack of notification nor how this massive change came about, but at a time when people are sometimes distrustful of government personnel we should see a better and more open process. I am 67 years old, moved to Edina with my family in 1960, graduated from Edina - Morningside High Scool in 1965 and bought my home in Nov. 1971. 1 have always taken great pride in my home and community. In recent years the changes in Edina have been profound, some good, some not so good, and some disturbing in my opinion. Apparently your Vision of Edina includes the "living streets" idea. Let me say that the heaviest pedestrian traffic occurs on my street after football games and when the cross country team travels through the neighborhood. Do you really think either of those groups would confine themselves to a sidewalk? Doubtful. It was mentioned that sidewalks would encourage students to walk to school. Apparently we will be phasing out school bus service as part of the overall plan to discourage automobile use in this city. Your plan would add a great financial burden to those of us who can no longer shovel snow(forget trying to find a teen ager to do the job). It means a snow plow service and few if any of them would want sidewalk without driveway business. No matter how you spin that issue, that is reality, this is Minnesota. I suggest that a "sidewalk referendum vote" be taken by a simple yes or no ballot along with a brief(and honest) explaination of the issue in a mailing to the addresses of those homeowners affected by this plan. Let the majority rule in a transparent way. Sincerely, Tom Marsh, 5109 W. 60th St, Edina 55436 Phone 952 - 927 -9108 ltival 104 17 2014 1 .-P,rna.i L,' omha.r�i..��m�z.��, neh Recommendation Concerning West Shore Drive Proposed Sidewalk from 70`h to Hibiscus Comment by: Russell Nelson, 7117 West Shore Drive Executive Summary: Edina Active Routes to School should be the most safe and most used sidewalks to get children safely to school. West Shore Drive is a north/south street that does not bring students directly to school and is likely to not be used by Cornelia students. West Shore Drive should not be designated as an Active Route to School. East/west streets should be used to get more students quickly and safely to school. Dunham would be used to collect students from the neighborhood west of West Shore Drive. A current path from Aspasia Circle feeds people into Dunham. Wooddale from Gilford to Claremore Dr would collect students and feed them into Claremore and directly to school. This is the shortest route to Cornelis School and would potentially be heavily used. Proposed Active Route to School C JVMrt \ S J Y Is m x proposed active route to school Details and Facts: "Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan" (version October 2013 adopted by the city council in 2014) - Does not designate West Shore Drive as an "Active Route to School ". - In Exhibit 10 (copy enclosed) West Shore Drive is shown as a proposed sidewalk with the same code as the sidewalk on the east side of France Avenue. - There is no coding in the legend of Exhibit 10 showing any "Active Route to School ". - On page 1 is found "no route can truly be made to be `safe "'. - On page 14 (copy enclosed) the Cornelia staff did not mention West Shore Drive as street needing sidewalks. - On page 13 (copy enclosed) there is no mention of any pedestrian or bicycle crash in the Cornelia neighborhood in 10 years of a child that would attend Cornelia. - The study on page 22 (copy enclosed) recognizes sidewalks are opposed by residents and the sidewalks were removed from the proposed projects in the past. - The study on page 23 (copy enclosed) states 58% of the respondents to a survey (copy enclosed) think there are about the right amount of sidewalks in the city. - Recommendations of the plan on pages 24, 29, 30, and 31 do not mention anything about sidewalks on West Shore Drive. Other factors to consider: - Children and students try to take the shortest route to school (remember when you were in college). - The shortest route to Cornelia School is not West Shore Drive going north to 70`h and then east to Cornelia. - The shortest route to Cornelia School is east on Dunham, north on Wooddale, and then east on Claremore. - The sidewalks on Dunham and Wooddale would use a smaller amount of concrete than the proposed West Shore Drive sidewalks. - The Dunham/Wooddale sidewalks would be more environmentally friendly. - The 2013 residential survey conducted by Decision Resources, Ltd. in question 149 (copy enclosed) states 86% of the respondents rate the current "ease of getting from place to place within the city of Edina by walking" as excellent or good. Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan October 2013 Prepared By: Kimley -Horn C and Associates, Inc. Statewide Health Improvement Program � SHIP H E A L T H R E F O R M .i i i+ Introduction Walking and biking to school in the United States has decreased dramatically, from over 60 percent in the 1960s to an average of less than 10 percent today. This reduction in active transportation, and corresponding increase in vehicular transportation, negatively affects students' health, vehicle congestion, traffic safety, and environmental quality around schools. In Hennepin County, only 24 percent of children age 6 to 17 years get the minimum amount of physical activity recommended by the Centers for Disease Control.l,z To reverse this decades -long trend of decreased walking and biking, the nationwide Safe Routes to School (SRTS) initiative was created to increase walking and biking to school through the implementation of each of the five "E's ": • Education — Teaching children to walk and bike safely • Encouragement — Developing programs that get children excited about walking or biking to school • Enforcement — Having law enforcement support along the designated routes to school • Engineering — Identifying infrastructure barriers to walking and biking • Evaluation — Measuring the effectiveness of the various components of the SRTS project Locally, walking and biking projects have been initiated and funded through federal transportation funds, as well as the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP). SHIP is dedicated to promoting active living in communities throughout Minnesota, with the goal of reducing obesity and preventing disease. The purpose of this Comprehensive Active Routes to School Plan (ARTS) is to document the existing walking and biking environment in Edina, identify opportunities and priorities to increase walking and biking to schools, and develop an implementation plan for making the improvements. The comprehensive nature of the plan provides an overall view of the needs and priorities in the community. Nationwide, the efforts to increase the number and safety of students walking and biking to school is generally referred to as "Safe Routes to School ". However, this can be a misleading term as no route can truly be made to be "safe." In addition, the plan addresses many aspects of active transportation, of which safety is only one component. Therefore, Edina has chosen to identify the scope of activities '&;o :Zuwr$ related to walking and biking to schools as "Active Routes to School ". This name more accurately describes the focus of the plan and its desired outcomes. Background The City of Edina has taken a number of significant steps to improve walking and bicycling in the city, including: • Established a bicycle task force. • Completed the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2007). Implementation of the plan is underway. Statewide } Health Improvement : f Program = "......— ' .. =F® Kimley -Horn H E A L T H R E F O R N1 1 ® and Associates, Inc. In addition to the issues observed during the on -site evaluations, school staff identified several other walking and biking concerns including the lack of sidewalk on Cornelia Drive north of W 701h Street and the need for a sidewalk or trail connection from the Parklawn neighborhood to the school. Countryside Elementary School Countryside Elementary School has approximately 580 students in kindergarten through 5th grades. The school day runs from 9:20 am to 3:50 pm. The walking and biking infrastructure around the school includes sidewalk along the east side of Tracy Avenue and north side of Benton Avenue. School crossing signing and high visibility crosswalk markings are installed at several key intersections around the school, as shown in Figure 4. A 15 -mph school speed zone was posted in 2009 on Tracy Avenue as a result of the School Speed Zone Study. Reconstructed Tracy Avenue with bicycle lanes and high visibility crosswalks The segment of Tracy Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue was reconstructed in 2012 to include a two -lane roadway section and on- street bicycle lanes and sidewalk on the east side of the roadway. The posted speed limit was also reduced from 30 mph to 25 mph as part of the project. In addition to the school speed zone and school crossing on Tracy Avenue near Benton Avenue, there are also signed pedestrian crossings of Tracy Avenue at Grove Street, Warden Avenue, Hawkes Drive, and Hawkes Place and a dynamic driver feedback (YOUR SPEED) sign. Tracy Avenue and Benton Avenue east of Tracy Avenue are identified as primary bicycle routes in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Bicycle racks at Countryside are located on the southeast corner of the school and near the front entrance. Both locations are placed on concrete pads adjacent to sidewalk and were specifically situated to eliminate potential conflicts with vehicles entering the site. However, both racks are older styles that require the bicycle wheel to be locked to the rack, rather than the bicycle frame, which can result in a higher likelihood of vandalism or damage to the bicycle. Statewide Health Improvement SF,1_11 Progr am .i. _ H._ E A L T H R E F O R M No ;.n f,v Zioi✓ L FI Kimley -Horn 14 ® and Associates, Inc. identified a primary bicycle route in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. Bicycle parking at Cornelia is located on the west side of the school, near the playground. Although the bicycle racks are located on a concrete pad, which is beneficial for providing convenient parking during wet conditions, the racks are not visible from the school building and are not easily accessible from the main school entrances. The racks are also older styles that require the bicycle wheel to be locked to the rack, rather than the bicycle frame, which can result in a higher likelihood of vandalism or damage to the bicycle. Pedestrian and bicycle crashes were reviewed for a 10 -year period (2003 -2012) within 0.7 miles of the school to identify any potential safety issues within the walk radius. A total of eight bicycle crashes and 1:4 ' five pedestrian crashes were reported, with four involving a pedestrian or cyclist between 15 and 18 ,vo years old. Approximately half the crashes occurred during the summer months (June- August) and half i�1- /t%Z,(o/V during the rest of the year. The rate of crashes involving 15 to 18 year -old pedestrians and bicyclists in this area is higher than seen cit)wide. ei,F During observations in November 2012, approximately 50 students were observed walking and 5 4�°�'v6- students were observed bicycling to and from school, representing about 10 percent of the student n� *c+4 population. However, this is a relatively small portion of the 30 percent of students that live within the walk zone. The primary routes are to the north and south on Cornelia Drive, however the sidewalk on Cornelia Drive ends just north of W 70`h Street. There is also a lack of sidewalk infrastructure to the west of the school. Buses load and unload in the main parking lot on the south side of the school. Family vehicles occupy the driveway on the east side of the school, both sides of Cornelia Drive near the school entrance, and also some parts of the south parking lot. The school driveway entrances are very wide and were observed to be the source of conflicts and right -of -way confusion between pedestrians and vehicles, even when the school patrol was present to assist with the crossings of the driveways. Vehicles leaving the school and turning left onto westbound W 70h Street also created conflicts with the school patrols and the pedestrians crossing W 70`h Street. Wide crossing of the school driveway creates potential vehicle /pedestrian conflicts Cornelia has participated in past National Walk to School Day events, which was promoted through physical education classes, and has hosted the district bike rodeo for the past two years. Statewide "fY _ Health Improvement Program ® Kimley Horn H E A L T H R E F 0 R M 13 ®= and Associates, Inc. 1. State Aid. Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State -Aid designated roadway and are paid 100 percent by State -Aid funds. 2. Public School Zone. Costs will be split using 25 percent City funds, 25 percent School funds, and 50 percent Special Property Assessments. 3. Destination Zone. Costs will be split between 25 percent City funds and 75 percent Special Property Assessments. 4. Local/ Low Volume Street Zone. Costs will be finances 100 percent through Special Property Assessments. Roadway Design Policy 4. Design /enhance residential street systems to discourage through traffic and to be compatible with lower speed bicycling and walking. This includes consideration of traffic calming measures on local streets and, in some cases, collector streets. Policy 5. Design /enhance collector and arterial roadways to minimize through traffic on local streets in the functional classification system, and to be compatible with other transportation modes including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. Roadway Maintenance and Operation Policy S. Complete speed zone studies and establish speed zones for Safe Routes to School. However, the funding of sidewalk and bicycle facilities in Edina has changed since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The PACS fund was approved by the Edina City Council in December 2012 to provide dedicated funding to make the community more walkable and bikeable. Revenue for the PACS is generated by a franchise fee ordinance and will be used exclusively for improvements to the City's non - motorized transportation network, including sidewalks, trails, and other bicycle infrastructure. The PACS fund may also be used to maintain existing sidewalks, signing, pavement markings, lighting, and pedestrian crossing signals. The Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan also contains a number of recommendations that support and complement the Active Routes to School program such as creating a bicycle coordinator position within the city, adopting a Complete Streets policy for street design, improving bicycle parking facilities at Edina public schools, and providing recurring bicycle safety training, education, and encouragement programs in Edina schools. The City of Edina has made progress on these recommendations in the creation of a Transportation Planner position to focus on bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and adopting a Living Streets policy. The Comprehensive Plan identifies future sidewalk and bicycle facilities for improvements, which are summarized in Figure 8. However, one of the challenges to implementation of these policies and projects is public opposition. On several past projects in the city, construction of new sidewalks was �a^1 opposed by residents and was ultimately removed from the proposed projects. In a 2013 surveys, a Statewide r' 7 Health Improvement 71�-Program Kimley -Horn H E A L T H P E f 0 P M 22 and Associates, Inc. majority of residents indicated there are "about the right amount" of sidewalks (58 percent of respondents) and trails /bikeways (83 percent of respondents). Yet the most common issue and concern 44— expressed by school administration and parents is the lack of sidewalk infrastructure to schools. This conflict in public perception is an issue that will continue to be a challenge to implementation of new infrastructure to support walking and biking in Edina. Edina Public Schools The Edina School District established a Wellness Policy in. 2008 that addresses nutrition guidelines, nutrition education, physical activity, and parent education. Although it does not specifically address walking or biking to school, several of the policy statements align well with the goals of the ARTS program: IL General Statements of Policy A. The school board recognizes that nutrition education and physical education are essential components of the educational process and that good health fosters student attendance and education. B. The school environment should promote and protect students' health, wellbeing, and ability to learn by encouraging healthy eating and physical activity. D. Children need access to healthy foods and opportunities to be physically active in order to grow, learn, and thrive. E. All students will have opportunities, support, and encouragement to be physically active on a regular basis. In addition, the Guidelines within the Wellness Policy provide support for physical activity outside of the school day: Ill. Guidelines E. Communication with Parents 2. The school district will support parents' efforts to provide a healthy diet and daily physical activity for their children. 4. The school district will provide information about physical education and other school -based physical activity opportunities and will support parents' efforts to provide their children with opportunities to be physically active outside of school. The School District also has a Wellness Committee that includes the director of business services, the manager of food services, the director of teaching and learning, the coordinator of health services, and at least three parent representatives. However, there is not a representative of the Transportation Services Department included on the committee. Statewide Health � j _...,._ I Improve9 ment Pro ram r ' ®,® Kimley -Horn H E A L T H R E F 0 P M 23 ® and Associates, Inc. A number of localized ARTS activities have also been occurring at the individual school sites, such as participation in International Walk to School Day in the fall and National Bike to School Day in the spring, and hosting of a bike rodeo. Most of the schools have bicycle parking available and the elementary schools operate a school patrol to provide for safe crossings immediately next to the school but the school patrol consists of students which is not a best practice. However, there are not currently district - wide ARTS activities or walking /biking curriculum, and there are varying degrees of infrastructure, support, and encouragement for walking and biking among the various school sites within the district. Recommendations The following sections and Figures 9 -14 present recommendations to increase walking and biking to schools in Edina. The implementation timeline for each recommendation has been identified (short- term, mid -term, long -term, or on- going) as well as identifying the agencies or organizations that would most appropriately take the lead in implementation. The recommendations identified as short-term are generally actions that could be implemented in the next two years mid -term improvements are generally considered to require two to four years to implement, and long -term recommendations are expected to require more than four years. Recommendations considered to be long -term may also �iv Zso✓ai' trigger other processes such as policy changes or identification of significant funding sources. In some M/n cases, the recommendations in this plan support or reiterate projects or recommendations already contained within the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Funding of the recommendations is discussed further in the Funding and Implementation section of this report. Short -Term Improvements ■ Improve bicycle parking at Edina High School /Valley View Middle School and Highlands Elementary School. These two school sites were identified as having the most immediate needs for improvements in bicycle parking. The school sites currently have bicycle racks that are in poor condition and not well - located for convenience and security. Racks should be installed in paved areas that are visible and proximate to the main entrances of the schools. A fenced and monitored bicycle corral could also be considered at the same time for the high school and middle school, or this could be implemented as a later phase. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. Statewide Health ' Improvement Program _.. ,,_...... H E A L T H R E E 0 R R4 Example of a bicycle corral at Richfield Middle School ® ®®® Kimley -Horn 24 ®® and Associates, Inc. JL MEL • Construct pedestrian ramps at the school crossing at W 72 "d Street / Oaklawn Avenue. The intersection lacks pedestrian ramps, which are needed for accessibility for all pedestrians. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Evaluate effectiveness of school speed zone signing and establish city policy for use of school speed zones. The currently posted school speed zones are all signed to be in effect "When Children Are Present ". Past studies have drawn differing conclusions on the driver response to this type of static signing, static signing stating the times the speed zone was in effect, and /or the inclusion of flashers. However, many of the other studies were conducted on high speed (greater than 45 mph) roadways. Evaluating the speed zone compliance and effect of signing and flashers within Edina should be used to determine the appropriate city -wide standard for existing and any new school speed zones. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. Long -Term Improvements ■ Reconstruct and narrow the driveways at Cornelia Elementary. The existing driveways onto Cornelia Drive are both very wide and results in a vehicle /pedestrian conflicts and right -of- way confusion. The driveways °should be reconstructed to shorten the crossing distances for pedestrians. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools. ■ Construct sidewalk connection from 46— Oaklawn Avenue to Parklawn Avenue near Cornelia Elementary School. Cornelia Elementary students that live in the multi- family housing along Parklawn Avenue are Statewide !"improvement Health _5 Program H E A t. T H R E F U R M The school crossing on W 72 "d Street near Cornelia Elementary lacks pedestrian ramps Comefia .{ o c/arei�or 1 ; 5 r , Y, . t x Ellsworth Dr Q tt + s r C\ (�` Fandell r rr �Y A >e r Ir c $ l i 5 � � a r + •:i h r 'Q. , I ml..r.., t. Ik:G�aQAT�xf � �S 7 : � 'otentf�l S[d�wall� �5B,ment -q . Parklawnn AVA Potential sidewalk connection from Parklawn Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue CMFI Kimley -Horn 29 i and Associates, Inc. A� Statewide �T - Health Improvement H E APL.9 Tm H � SF,-1- .L -.; C=F1 Kimley -Horn NI 30 � and Associates, Inc. within %: mile of the school, but due to the lack of direct roadway or sidewalk route, must walk approximately one mile to school with part of the route along the heavily traveled France Avenue. An easement should be pursued in order to build a direct and more comfortable sidewalk connection from Parklawn Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue, which would benefit not only Cornelia Elementary students but also members of the community that use Cornelia School Park. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on W 58th Street east of Wooddale Avenue. The city's Comprehensive Plan identified sidewalk to be constructed on W 58`h Street all the way to France Avenue. W 58`h Street is already a primary route for South View Middle School students, and extending the existing sidewalk east of Wooddale Avenue will continue to improve connectivity and routes to the school. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk connection from Ayrshire Boulevard to Highlands Elementary School. Highlands Elementary students that live in the neighborhood east and north of the school along Ayrshire Boulevard within '' /< mile of the school, but due to the lack of direct roadway or sidewalk route, either walk between residential homes and through the wooded area next to the school, or walk more than %: mile to school with part of the route along the heavily traveled Vernon Avenue. An easement should be pursued in order to build a direct and more comfortable sidewalk connection from Highlands Elementary to the neighborhoods surrounding . the school. Implementation lead: Edina Public Schools and City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on Valley View Road, Tracy Avenue, and Gleason Road. These roadways are planned for repaving in the city's capital improvement program and are also identified for future sidewalk in the Comprehensive Plan. The sidewalk should be implemented along with the roadway projects, improving the connectivity between the school and the neighborhoods south and west of the school. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on Sun Road, Arbour Avenue, and Olinger Boulevard near Countryside Elementary School. These roadways are planned for repaving in the city's capital improvement program and are also identified for future sidewalk in the Comprehensive Plan. The sidewalk should be implemented along with the roadway projects, improving the connectivity between the school and the neighborhoods south and west of the school. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on Benton Avenue adjacent to Countryside Elementary School. There is currently no sidewalk along Benton Avenue in front of the school, although it is shown in the city's Comprehensive Plan as future sidewalk. The existing walking /bicycling route to the east the school includes a set of stairs to reach Tracy Avenue, which is a challdnge for bicyclists or mobility- impaired pedestrians. The sidewalk on Benton Avenue in front of the school would provide an alternate route for these users. Implementation lead: City of Edina. • Construct sidewalk on Claremore Drive, Kellogg Avenue, and Wooddale Avenue near Cornelia �L +a Elementary. These sidewalk segments are identified in the city's Comprehensive Plan and would improve accessibility and connectivity to the neighborhoods west of Cornelia Elementary. Le Implementation lead: City of Edina. 5''IBn� • Construct sidewalk on Cornelia Drive from W 70`h Street to W W Street. Sidewalk on Cornelia ' Drive currently ends just north of W 70th Street, and does not connect to Lake Cornelia Park or the Statewide �T - Health Improvement H E APL.9 Tm H � SF,-1- .L -.; C=F1 Kimley -Horn NI 30 � and Associates, Inc. existing sidewalk on W 66`h Street. This segment of sidewalk was previously removed from the sidewalk plan in the city's Comprehensive Plan, but is an important north -south sidewalk link between France Avenue and TH 100. Implementation lead: City of Edina. Construct sidewalk or trail on Interlachen Boulevard. A trail was previously proposed along Interlachen Boulevard in 2006, but was not approved, and this sidewalk segment was removed from the city's Comprehensive plan. Interlachen Boulevard, although not serving as a direct route to a school site, is one of the few opportunities for a direct east -west route in the northern part of the city. This sidewalk or trail segment could also then be connected to Highland Elementary School via Mirror Lakes Drive and Highlands Park. Implementation lead: City of Edina. Funding and Implementation Funding for the various recommended projects may come from a variety of sources depending on the type of project and who is implementing it. Some potential funding opportunities that currently exist and may be used to fund these recommendations include, but are not limited to: • Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota • Mini - grants through the National Center for Safe Routes to School • Federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds administered through the Metropolitan Council • Safe Routes to School funds administered through the Minnesota Department of Transportation • Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Over the past four years, Minnesota Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) funds have been administered by the Minnesota Department of Health through cities and counties around the state in the form of Safe Routes to School grants, Active Living grants, and assistance with preparing grant applications for other programs. These funds may be available in some form in the future, and continued communications between school districts, cities, and counties will help identify opportunities and needs forfunding in the future. No one of the E's of Safe Routes to School will by itself increase walking and biking, which emphasizes the need for cooperation among school, city, county and other agencies in the implementation of the recommendations identified in this plan. The process used to develop this plan is only the start of on- going efforts that will be needed to result in cultural changes and significant increases in walking and biking. Statewide Health in ! ! m 'x Program l "_ �.:,..... . H E A L T H R E F O R M ® ®,® Kimley -Horn 31 ®® and Associates, Inc. ron Klmicy Hors. �:'�^ .TIT[ N 0 312.5 625 1,250 Feet Figure 10. Cornelia Elementary �, Pnr11w ,�giq 3,60 ,r, A Recommendations Map DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. EDINA RESIDENTIAL 3128 Dean Court _SURVEY Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 FINAL APRIL 2013 Hello, I'm of Decision Resources, Ltd., a polling firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the City of Edina to speak with a random sample of residents.about issues facing the city. The survey is being taken because your city representatives and staff are interested in your opinions and suggestions. I want_ to assure you that all individual responses will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the entire sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE) 1. Approximately how many years have you lived in the City of Edina? LESS THAN TWO YEAR ..... 3% 2.1 TO FIVE YEARS ...... 9% 5.1 TO TEN YEARS ...... 13% 10.1 TO 20 YEARS ...... 286 20.1 TO 30 YEARS ...... 19% OVER THIRTY YEARS ..... 29% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED..... 0% 2. As things now stand, how long do LESS THAN TWO YEAR ..... 2% you expect to live in Edina? 2.1 TO FIVE YEARS ...... 1% 5.1 TO TEN YEARS ...... 116 OVER TEN YEARS........ 79% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 7% 3. Thinking back to when you moved to Edina, what factors were most important to you in selecting the city? CLOSE TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS, 12 %; CLOSE TO JOB, 111i; ALWAYS EDINA, 9 %; HOUSING /NEIGHBORHOOD, 21 %; REPUTATION, 7 %; CONVENIENT LOCATION, 3 %; GOOD SCHOOLS, 35 %; SCATTERED, 2 %. 4. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT .............73% life in Edina -- excellent, good, GOOD ..................266 only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR ..............16 POOR ...................0% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED..... 0% 5. What do you like most about living in the city of Edina? CLOSE TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS, 11%; CLOSE TO JOB, 5 %; CONVENIENT LOCATION, 9 %; HOUSING /NEIGHBORHOOD, 15%; REPUTATION /PRESTIGE, 7 %; PARKS AND TRAILS, 4 %; CLOSE TO SHOPPING, 8 %; NATURAL BEAUTY, 12 %s; SAFE, 6 %; GOOD SCHOOLS, 18 %; CITY SERVICES, 4 %; SCATTERED, 2%. For each of the following, please tell me whether the City is too tough, about right, or not tough enough in enforcing city codes on the nuisances. 32. Animal control? 33. Storage of cars, trucks and recreation vehicles? 34. Messy yards? 35. Exterior home maintenance? 36. Construction site maintenance? Switching focus.... TOO ABO NOT DK/ TOU RIG TOU REF 7% 79% 1306 206 401 80% 15% 1% 1% 80% 18% 0% 3% 84% 13% 1% 4% 79% 14% 3% I would like to read you a list of characteristics of a community. For each one, please tell me if you think Edina currently has too many or too much, too few or too little, or about the right amount. MANY FEW/ ABT DK/ /MCH LITT RGHT REFD 37. the number of people residing in the community? 16% 2% 82% 1% 38. rental units? 34% 21% 41% 5% 39. higher cost housing oppor- tunities? 2806 8% 600 506 40. condominiums and townhouses? 1406 1206 71% 3% 41. starter homes? 406 4806 43% 506 42. assisted living for seniors? 41 29% 53% 1506 43. nursing homes? 2% 28% 5206 1906 44. one level housing for seniors maintained by an association? 206 3306 4606 20% 45. parks and open spaces? 1% 7% 91% 10; 46. trails and bikeways? 76 10% 831 01 47. sidewalks? 206 410 5806 006 48. service and retail establish- ments? 306 10% 87% 006 49. entertainment and dining establishments? 406 12% 83% 0% 148. How often do you walk in the City FREQUENTLY ............ 32% of Edina - frequently, occasionally, OCCASIONALLY .......... 47% rarely or never? RARELY ................18% NEVER ..................4% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED.....0% 149. How would you rate the ease of EXCELLENT ............. 23% j 6 4, %y getting from place to place within GOOD.. .63% the City of Edina by walking -- ONLY FAIR.. .11% excellent, good, only fair or poor? POOR.. .2% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 16 IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK: (n =52) 150. What changes or improvements could the City of Edina make to improve your ability to get from place to place within the city by walking? UNSURE, 06; NONE, 2 %; MORE SIDEWALKS, 73 %; MORE TRAILS, 4 %; LONGER CROSSWALK TIMES, 10 %; SCATTERED, 601. Weather permitting.... 151. How often do you bike in the City FREQUENTLY .............56 of Edina - frequently, occasionally, OCCASIONALLY .......... 28% rarely or never? RARELY ................15% NEVER .................52% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED.....1% 152. How would you rate the ease of EXCELLENT ..............9% getting from place to place within GOOD ..................71% the City of Edina by biking - ex- ONLY FAIR ..............5% cellent, good, only fair, or poor? POOR ...................1% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED.... 15% IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK: (n =22) 153. What changes or improvements could the City of Edina make to improve your ability to get from place to place within the city by biking? UNSURE, 526; NONE, 14 %; MORE SIDEWALKS, 916; MORE TRAILS, 27 %; WIDER TRAILS, 9 %; MORE BICYCLE LANES, 14 %; LONGER CROSSWALK TIMES, 14 %; BICYCLE LANES ARE TOO CONFUSING, 5 %; SCATTERED, 4 %. Moving on.... Engineering Department Phone 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.EdinaMN.gov Date: December 2, 2014 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Re: Agenda Item # VIII. A. Resolution No. 2014 -153 Sidewalk Map Amendment Correspondence Received Since Council Packet Was Delivered on Nov. 26 MEMO Please find attached the correspondence received by staff regarding the above item, since the Dec. 2 City Council Meeting packets were delivered to Council (on Nov. 26). Attachments: Email correspondence between residents and staff regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map Mark K. Nolan From: Stephanie Vitt <stephanie.vitt @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:22 PM To: Chad Millner Cc: Patrick Wrase; Mark K. Nolan; jclement @sehinc.com; tmuse @sehinc.com Subject: Re: 20141125 Halifax Sidewalk Petition RE: Halifax Ave Reconstruction Thanks for the feedback Chad. I am disappointed you don't think the sidewalk makes sense. Our block is 2 blocks from downtown Edina. To have sidewalks on half of the streets and not on the others will look strange long -term. Imagine Country Club with sidewalks on half the streets? The young residents, who represent the future of Edina, want this sidewalk. Please reconsider. I will see you on the 9th. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Stephanie, Thanks again for the comments. I will review the petition with the council at the Dec. 9 public hearing during the presentation. Your welcome to provide further input to the council before the meeting or during the meeting if you so choose. I applaud your efforts to add a sidewalk along the west side of Halifax. We are estimating that sidewalk to cost between $150,000 - $170,000. As you may know, our funding for sidewalks is limited and we have many needs in town. Many streets do not have any sidewalks and many of our active routes to schools are also lacking sidewalks. The cost of this sidewalk is approximately 15 —17% of our annual sidewalk budget. Considering the cost and that we have sidewalks with much higher priorities, I will not be recommending this sidewalk to the council. They may disagree and order it as part of the project. I have also received input against this sidewalk from residents not on the petition. As I mentioned, the council will consider this at the public hearing on Dec. 9. Thanks again for your engagement in your project, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering <ima e001. 1 952 -826 -03181 Fax 952- 826 -0392 g g cmillnerCcDEdinaMN.Mov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Stephanie Vitt [ mailto :stephanie.vitt(a)yahoo.coml Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 1:36 PM To: Chad Millner; Patrick Wrase Subject: Fwd: Halifax Ave Reconstruction Hi Chad and Patrick I am just following up on my petition to add a sidewalk to the west side of Halifax between 5200 -5336. Looking at the proposed sidewalk map, it seems like a no brainier to add this sidewalk. There are sidewalks going in on 52nd and 54th between Halifax and Minnehaha already so the sidewalk I am petitioning for would connect the two and provide a safe, continuous path. Can the sidewalk be added to the plan at this point for consideration? Don't mean.to be pushy ... just really think the sidewalk makes sense and now is the time to do it. Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: Mary Balogh <mebalogh cr gmail.com> Date: November 20, 2014 at 7:09:44 PM CST To: kaafedt@gmail.coin, daafedt cr,wintlirop.com, Cecile.adamsl@gmail.com, jakhtar@hbk.com, aakhtarAme.com, heik00IO@umn.edu, arthu012@umn.edu, bbaradeingmail.com, courtne baradel @gmail.coni, mldl964@aol.com, tbmn@aol.com, pemiUvk@aol.com, mare balogh@fws.gov, ideets@gmail.com, chrisdeets@gmail.com, nmdobbs@gmail.com, Steve.Domke(,Gmail.com, LMD61 @AOL.Com, jdrannen@stpaule ems, iill.rocheleau@consulting_ SDC.com, NickD@consulting- SDC.com, mfeldkamp@mac.com, miriamkim@earthlink.net, martijflores@gmail.com, julie.frommelt@gpmlaw.com, D1w5400@aol.com, mike@prestwickpartners.net, scmmeg_@gmail.com, erath0l gmail.com, charles.h.hamilton@pic.com, slhanlon@aol.com, blake.hanlon a,bestbuy.com, steph.hultman@gmail.com, john.hultman@gmail.com, lmi@visi.com, bobbykansara@gmail.com, johnkirchner@mac.com, catherinemarvin@yahoo.com, g lg aing_@gmail.com, kathyill l@aol:com, hloefflerl@aol.coin; metzlink@earthlink.net, mike.marinovich@cbre.com, kristen.opsahl@gmail.com, suzysalsa@gmail.co mcdonough@q.com, itmeenan@outlook.com, browneyes040l Aaol.com, nancyn@mtolivet.org, Rogernashl@yahoo.com, 4nellies @comcast.net, nicke012@yahoo.com, LLO6100@yahoo.com, kodeal e,msn.com, MARIE .. . PECHMAN <mbpechman@msn.com >, ritampeluso@yahoo.com, ron@pobiel.com, mip53roxy@gmail.com, bporter4339@msn.com, radder88@mac.com, jenreiinerl @yahoo.com, josh reiner cr,bmc.com, kehe.ross@gmail.com, mollys@thelawlorgroup.com, HeatherSimonsen@hotmail.com, CluistopherSimonsen@yahoo.com, lindasmaby@edinarealty.com, iohnsmaby@edinarealty com, bobdena@gmail.com, sriverAgmail.com, allisonkehle@yahoo.com, nvanwiiilc a,yahoo.com, svanwinkle@comcast.net, Stephanie.vitt@yahoo.com, j im.vitt@associatedbank.com, jim.vitt@ymail.com, markbethwaterloo@mac.com, dwaynewenger@hotmail.com , email@traveling irg l.com, Stephanienelson@formafeed.com, icadams@cbburnet.com Subject: Halifax Ave Reconstruction Greetings, The City of Edina's website had a good presentation about our Halifax Ave street reconstructions scheduled next year, 2015. It was presented on Sept 22, 2014. The presentation is available at: http: / /edinamn.gov /edinafiles /files /City Offices/Engineering/Construction Projec is /Arden Park_D/ Sept %2022 %20Presentation.pdf It would be good to review the entire presentation but here are the two important items of information: - Timeline (page 4) - Costs to inspect/replace /repair sanitary sewer pipe from our houses to the city easement are the home owner's responsibility (Page 8 & 29) -The street lighting system is reported to need replacement (page 14 & 31) - Options to pave the alley between Halifax Av and Minnehaha Blvd (Page 16) - Proposed Roadway Improvements (page 17 -22) - Utility Details (Page 23) - Assessments (Page 32) $13,100 - 15,500 The City Council will hear comments from residents and make a final decision at the City Council Meeting Dec 12. The website is frequently broken so I attached the presentation too. Mary Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:10 AM To: 'Jane Melroe' Subject: RE: West Shore Drive sidewalks Ms. Melroe, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding sidewalk facilities on West Shore Drive. Your input will be considered by staff and included with other resident correspondence for the Dec. 2 City Council meeting. Please note that the Sidewalk Facilities Map does not indicate which side of the road future sidewalks will be constructed — this has not yet been determined. This decision will be made a year or so before a sidewalk is scheduled for construction, when an engineering study (which takes into account impacts such as trees, slopes, utilities etc.) is prepared. Also, sidewalks are typically constructed when a road is reconstructed; West Shore Drive was recently reconstructed (in 2009). 1 would think that the next reconstruction of this street would not take place for up to 30 years or more, which is the planning horizon for this Map (which shows potential future sidewalks in the next 20 -30 years). If you have specific questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me by phone at 952 - 826 -0322. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 �.� MNolan(cDEdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jane Melroe fmailto:jmbrumel(a)gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:49 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: West Shore Drive sidewalks Mark Nolan I would like to give you my opinion concerning the sidewalks proposed for West Shore Drive. was unable to attend the discussion meeting, but, know that once the City Council decides to approve an idea, they usually don't change their minds even when the people, who actually live on West Shore Drive and are directly affected by the decision, give their opinions on the situation. Why is the sidewalk only being considered to Hibiscus? Will there be a 'road' or another public access area to get to the new park development area? Why wouldn't a sidewalk extend to the new park area at the same time? In my opinion, a logical placement of a sidewalk would be on the East side of West Shore Drive for the following reasons: 1: There are crosswalk lines already in place from West Shore Drive to the sidewalk on north 66th Street and around the lake. 2: If the sidewalk were on the East side, crosswalk lines could be placed on the street at the Dunham & West Shore Drive intersection to a: provide a safety walk way from the sidewalk between Aspasia Circle & West Shore Drive and b: to slow down the traffic which speeds through the area. I was told that crosswalk lines could not be placed on West Shore Drive because there were no sidewalks to connect. If yet another sidewalk were built on the north side of Dunham, the young residents could walk their children safely to Cornelia and the older residents could safely walk to their favorite shopping places on France Avenue. 3: When the city replaced the gas mains, they were moved into the yards of the residents on the West side of West Shore Drive. In an effort to reduce sidewalk replacement costs and foot traffic detours if there were a gas main problem, the sidewalks would be better placed on the East side for cost and safety reasons. 4:1 noticed that most fire hydrants are placed on the East side of West Shore Drive. Having the sidewalks placed near them would encourage the homeowners to make sure the hydrants were assessable, especially in the winter. Even though the city mailings state that the home owner is responsible for clearing the hydrants (on their property) of snow & other possible problems for firefighters, not all residents read the mailings. When I called the city to see if they would contact our across the street neighbors to shovel the snow from around the hydrant, the person I talked to said I should go over and clear it off myself! Having a sidewalk close to the hydrant might encourage the snow removal person to accept the responsibility of keeping the neighborhood safe. Hopefully, those people making the decision on where to build the sidewalk will have actually visited the area and listened to the residents who actually live along West Shore Drive as to where the best placement of the sidewalk should be located. Will the placement become a political issue & will residents have to lobby city hall with their concerns? Will the discussions and decisions continue to be transparent for those residents directly involved? Is the city considering a bike lane like on 70th or will the bikers be able to ride on the sidewalk? Will some of us lose the parking in front of our homes & some keep their parking like the city council member on 70th Street? Lots of issues to consider with a proposed project like this. I continue to be interested in the decision process. Jane Melroe 952 - 926 -9736 Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday,. December 01, 2014 8:12 AM To: 'Lisa Nelson' Subject: RE: Sidewalks Ms. Nelson, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your support for the Sidewalk Facilities Map, and for sidewalks in the northwest quadrant of Edina. This input will be included with other resident correspondence for the Dec. 2 City Council meeting. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Lisa Nelson [mailto:lisanelson50 @mac.com] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 7:19 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Sidewalks I live in the NW quadrant and was unable to attend the sidewalk meeting. I am writing in support generally of the sidewalk plan. Specifically, of the streets I am most familiar with, I think it is essential to get sidewalks on the northern portion of Blake Road which is frightening to drive - there is no visibility and runners and bikers on both sides of the road. I also strongly support sidewalks on Interlachen, Gleason, Olinger, Hansen and Benton and especially for crossing Hwy 62 on Gleason & Tracy. I hope those locations will be at the top of your construction list. Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 8:14 AM To: 'Cheryl Lany' Subject: RE: Edina Sidewalk Map Ms. Lany, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your support for sidewalk facilities in Edina. This input will be considered by staff and included with other resident correspondence for the Dec. 2 City Council meeting. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner c G 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan aa)EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ,., ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Cheryl Lany fmailto:cslany @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:01 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Edina Sidewalk Map A sidewalk on East 60th St between France and Xerxes would improve walking opportunities and safety in my neighborhood and to others in the city. 60th is a very busy street. There are no east -west sidewalks between France and Xerxes in this area. It is unsafe to walk along, especially in winter. The neighborhood has many walkers, including those with strollers and with dogs. Children also wait for their school buses along 60th. Last summer when the Xerxes bridge over Hwy 62 was closed 60th Street was especially busy and dangerous. A sidewalk on 60th would also encourage bus commuting since there are plentiful bus routes along both France and Xerxes with connections to the Transit Hub at Southdale. It is currently listed as a Future State -Aid Sidewalk and it is my request that this sidewalk be added as soon as possible. My mother lives on Garrison Lane one block south of Valley View and Wooddale. The area between Valley View and Hwy 62 has no sidewalks or plans for them. This is also an area with many walkers with strollers and dogs. There is a wonderful bridge which goes over Hwy that would benefit from a connecting sidewalk from Valley View along Wooddale south 2 blocks to Nancy Lane to meet with the bike path. The hill along Wooddale going up to Valley View is not safe for street walking, especially with all of the trucks and vehicles parked along Wooddale. Cheryl Lany Mark K. Nolan From: WinnieandSteve Martin, <martins6012 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 20141:15 PM To: Mark K. Nolan; Bass, Katherine Subject: 12/2 VOTE /$ issues I have had 5 ppl in last 30 min. ask me about tax levy and cost implications of these sidewalks. It needs to be SHOUTED FROM THE MOUNTAIN TOP AND CRYSTAL CLEAR tomorrow.that these are appropriated funds from various avenues that will pay these selected/identified ARTS. As city is doing infrastructure assessments (ie $16k for my 'hood next year) ppl are extremely sensitive right now to this subject. They don't want to pay $1 for anything else regardless of how good/beneficial. These ARTS will not be at an additional expense/burden to homeowners. (Yes, in theory it will increase their property value over the long term that may raise their homeowner's rates and tax responsibilities but that's a good thing, right ?) Winnie Mark K. Nolan From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:16 PM To: 'Erin Zamoff' Subject: RE: In support of more sidewalks in Edina Ms. Zamoff, Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding your support for sidewalk facilities in Edina. This input will be considered by staff and included with other resident correspondence for the Dec. 2 City Council meeting. Thanks again, at�n `I:J Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952- 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 r� } M Nola nA- EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6z. Doing Business From: Erin Zamoff [mailto:erinzamoff @ q.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:26 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: In support of more sidewalks in Edina Hello Mr. Nolan. I hope you enjoyed your Thanksgiving. I am a resident of Morningside and have students at Concord, South View and the High School. I felt that the November 20th article in the Star Tribune (http: / /www.startribune.com /local /west/283286561.html) did not accurately portray the views of Edina residents on sidewalks. I strongly support creating more sidewalks, especially near our schools so. that students can walk to school safely. As the city reviews its sidewalk plan, I hope that it takes, into account the views of all residents. Thank you, Erin Zamoff 9 Mark K. Nolan _From: Diane Davies <davies @visi.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:24 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: Re: replying to Strategic plan request..for some reason the email went "out " before I completed the response... please see below.. thanks Hi Mark Thank you so much for the helpful info. Regards Diane Sent from my Wad On Dec 2, 2014, at 8:20 AM, Mark K. Nolan <MNolan @EdinaMN.Bov> wrote: Diane, Here is information regarding two recent citywide surveys that had a more general focus, but asked questions regarding sidewalks /walkability: • A Quality of Life Survey was conducted in 2013 by Decision Resources, who completed the random 194 - question survey of about 400 Edina residents from around the community in May and June of last year. This type of survey is conducted in communities throughout the metro area, and in Edina every two years or so. An executive summary of the survey can be found here (questions 47, 149, 150 and more): httD: / /edinamn.eov /corecode /uploads /document /uploaded pdfs /corecode edina /2013 %20Edi na %20Survey %20ResuIts 62.pdf. • The Community Needs Assessment Survey was completed and presented to the Park Board last month. In that Park and Recreation survey, 85% of respondents stated that their household has a need for "walking and biking trails." The results of this survey —which indicates citywide support for increased walkability in Edina — can be found here (along with a video of the presentation): http : / /edinamn.gov /parkproiects. The surveys that many residents cited at the northwest quadrant meeting was actually a questionnaire that our department typically sends out prior to planned neighborhood roadway reconstruction projects. Specifically, Ayrshire Blvd. and other nearby roads were reconstructed in 2008. A questionnaire was sent out to residents of just those streets in late 2007, which (among other items) asked if they felt that their streets need sidewalks (which they were assessed for at the time, but no longer are). At that time, the vast majority said "no." Liability questions are best left to our City Attorney, but I did discuss this with him recently. lust because someone trips and falls on a sidewalk in front of a home doesn't automatically allow them to collect money from a property owner. They would have to prove negligence (e.g. removing /melting snow with hot water, which then freezes, creating a hazard). Clearing a sidewalk of snow — or not clearing a sidewalk of snow — is typically not considered negligence, as I understand it. Also, most homeowners insurance policies cover this type of thing. 10 Edina's Living Streets Policy ( http : / /edinamn.gov /LivingStreets) calls for the overall reduction of impervious surfaces. This will be primarily be accomplished by the reduction of street widths when roads are reconstructed. The overall reduction of street widths (typically from 30 -feet wide to 24- or 27- feet wide) over time will more than make up for the additional 5 -foot wide sidewalk(s). Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner <ima eO01. if> 952 -826 -0322 1 Fax 952 -826 -0392 g g MNolan ED-EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Diane Davies [mailto:davies@visi.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:39 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: RE: replying to Strategic plan request-for some reason the email went "out " before I completed the response... please see below.. thanks Thanks Mark. Could you please share the data the City of Edina has collected pertaining to sidewalks and walking trails so far? Several surveys were mentioned at the meeting we attended. Thanks again, Diane PS Has anyone summarized the liability issues for homeowners and the increased problems with lack of soil permeability causing increased damage to our environment? From: Mark K. Nolan [mailto:MNolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, December 01, 201412:19 PM To: 'davies @visi.com' Cc: Chad Millner; Chad Millner; Janet Canton Subject: RE: replying to Strategic plan request-for some reason the email went "out " before I completed the response... please see below.. thanks Diane, This weekend, I did read the Star Tribune article regarding millennials and multimodal transportation. It is not just a local, but a national trend. Also, regarding your request for research pertaining to sidewalks: please refer to the following information. MnDOT's'Minnesota's Best Practices for Pedestrian /Bicycle Safety' discusses preferred sidewalk and boulevard widths (see page 3 of the document): http• / /www dot state .mn.us /stateaid /trafficsafety/ reference /ped- bike - handbook- 09.18.2013- vl.pdf The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has conducted studies /reports that find that (in addition to reducing walking along roadway crashes) roadways without sidewalks can be more than twice as likely to have pedestrian crashes as roadways with sidewalks. Additionally, the FHWA states that "the wider the separation between the pedestrian and the roadway is, the more comfortable the pedestrian facility." Link with study references: http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /ped bike /tools solve /walkways trifold/ 11 • The FHWA also has stated that "a natural buffer [boulevard] provides the essential space needed for situations such as protecting pedestrians from out -of- control vehicles." Link: http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /ped bike /univcourse /pdf /swlessl3.pdf • According to Safe Routes to School guidelines: "The preferred minimum sidewalk width recommended for safe routes to schools is five to six feet." Follow this link: http: // guide. saferoutesinfo .org /engineering /sidewa11(s.cfm • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Architecture Barriers Act (ABA) guidelines state that sidewalks less than five feet in width are insufficient for wheelchair users to pass one another or to turn around (http: / /www. access - board ,gov /ada- aba /final.htm #Surfaces) Thank you, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner <Ima e001. If> 952- 826 -03221 Fax 952- 826 -0392 g g MNolanna EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Diane Davies f maiIto:davies @visi.com] Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 4:59 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Subject: FW: replying to Strategic plan request-for some reason the email went "out " before I completed the response... please see below.. thanks From: Diane Davies [mailto:davies @visi.com] Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 4:54 PM To:'Mark K. Nolan' Subject: RE: replying to Strategic plan request Hi Mark Thanks for your email. Could you send me any data you have from the surveys you have conducted or any other research you have done pertaining to sidewalk planning and walking trails? By the way did you see the article in today's MSP Tribune re: "millennials" . An organization called Transit for livable communities and someone named Hilary Reeve said "when it comes to transportation, millennials are signaling they want options for getting around.." Look forward to learning more about the process that is underway and the data collected so far. Thanks Diane From: Mark K. Nolan fmailto:MNolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:59 PM To: 'davies @visi.com' Cc:; Janet Canton; Edina Mail Subject: RE: replying to Strategic plan request Diane, Thank you for reaching out regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map and sidewalk planning in Edina. Your email will be included with other resident correspondence for the City Council for their Dec. 2 meeting. 12 If you wish to discuss your questions directly, please feel free to call me at 952 - 826 -0322 and we can discuss. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner <ima e001. If> 952 -826 -0322 I Fax 952- 826 -0392 g g MNolanna EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Diane Davies [mailto:davies@visi.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:24 AM To: Janet Canton Subject: replying to Strategic plan request Hi Could you please send me a summary of the research that has been done so far. I attended a meeting re: sidewalks this week and was surprised to discover that one of the neighborhoods slated to get sidewalks had told the City years ago that they did not want sidewalks and that they still do not want sidewalks. In the MPLS Trib a reference was made to research saying Milennials want sidewalks. Please send the references. At the "Sidewalk discussion meeting " this past week one millennial said she preferred to run and bike on the street because it was better for her knees, the other millennial who spoke said wanted sidewalks (eventhough her property would not be getting a sidewalk.).. It was mentioned that there had been 3 surveys of Edina residents, all since I moved here in 2009. When I asked how I didn't receive any of the surveys I was told it was a random survey. It was pointed out by another resident attendee that the surveys were not done in a statistically scientific way and he recommended that Edina conduct a comprehensive survey and engage all residents.. I am very confused about what has been done, what the results are and what the plans are going forward. Many people left the meeting this week feeling that they don't get the opportunity for input and that the City just does what it wants without communicating with the residents. I would like to get a fuller picture of the issues re: walking trails and sidewalks. Someone at the Mon meeting said she wanted trails not sidewalks. Is that what lead to the confusion and chaos? Please help me better understand this, Thanks Diane 13 Mark K. Nolan from: Ronald R. Rich <rrr @atmrcv.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 201412:47 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad Millner, 'James Hovland'; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; 'Sprague, Josh'; 'Ann Swenson'; Mary Brindle (Comcast); 'ART' Subject: RE: Public Comment on the "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" Mark: Ron is best. I appreciate that you continue to communicate with me and I also appreciate that you belief additional sidewalks would be beneficial for pedestrian safety. I also appreciate that you believe the "vast majority" of (presumably Edina) residents want them. The problem is there is no substantive data that supports either of your beliefs. Pedestrians happily "share the road" in residential neighborhoods now and there are few (I found zero) reported injuries or deaths when they do. You can't demonstrably claim improved safety if there is no safety improvement that can be achieved. Since you do claim increased safety, on what actual Edina facts do you base your assertion? All City sponsored survey and public meeting data for the last decade actually demonstrably shows that the "vast majority" (about 9 in 10) of Edina residents do NOT support additional sidewalks. Especially on low traffic volume neighborhood streets. You keep stating responses from the "vast majority" are "positive ". Yet you cite only two surveys. One that actually indicates less than 10% support. And the other that includes no question about additional neighborhood sidewalks at all. However, every City survey asking about sidewalks taken since 2006 is consistent. 90% of residents are opposed to additional sidewalks. I really wish you would review all the survey data yourself, and disclose during your presentations the actual,resident opposition. the actual Edina "pedestrian safety" and "resident support" reasons being cited for the amendment are false. Based on the facts, the costs of additional neighborhood sidewalks are not justified and are "positively" not wanted by residents. appreciated your adding that additional neighborhood sidewalks "is not just a local (Edina) 'trend,' but actually reflects policy changes that have been happening for years at the statewide, regional and national levels." However, unless the City is required by law to follow those "trends" that doesn't mean Edina must follow them. In fact, the very reason most residents I have talked with oppose the additional sidewalks is because it changes the character of the neighborhoods in which they would be imposed. It proves to me that the. "real" reason additional neighborhood sidewalks are. being promoted by the City is one I guessed in an earlier e-mail (below): "This is a 'forward thinking' issue (past examples: 'roundabouts' and 'densification') that City consultants and planners are convinced are 'good for' Edina over the longer term. Even if residents don't want or appreciate such change. I would hope Edina is not driven by a planning process that must "follow the crowd ". There appears to be no justification for the additional sidewalks other than "other cities are.doing it — so we must too ". Proceeding with them is bad public policy for Edina, because what sets Edina apart from other cities are the very residential neighborhoods the City would change. Once again, I really appreciate your willingness to respond. I believe your intent is good; but this plan unjustified. Most especially, I don't want Edina to just follow the city planning crowd when the additional sidewalk plan is has so few demonstrable benefits; taxpayer funds could better be spent elsewhere; and, the specific street plan so neighborhood disruptive. Thanks. Ronald R. Rich 14 President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com From: Mark K. Nolan [mailto:MNolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:13 AM To: 'Ronald R. Rich' Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad Millner; 'James Hovland'; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; 'Sprague, Josh'; 'Ann Swenson'; Mary Brindle (Comcast); 'ART Subject: RE; Public Comment on the "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" Ron (or do you prefer Ronald ?), City staff (myself included) has a strong understanding of the importance of planning and implementing a transportation system that is safe, efficient and accessible to all users. This includes motorists, transit users, bicyclists and pedestrians (including those most vulnerable: children, the elderly and disabled). I feel that the City has been clear and open about these goals and how we plan to reach them, and the vast majority of input we have received from residents (via all channels) has been positive. Also, City Council's unanimous adoption of the Living Streets Policy has given staff clear direction as well. Principles and benefits regarding accessibility, sidewalks, Living (Complete) Streets, etc. are not just a local (Edina) "trend," but actually reflects policy changes that have been happening for years at the statewide, regional and national levels. Regarding priorities, I feel that up until very recently we have been designing and implementing streets with a priority and focus on one single user: those using automobiles. Recognizing the need to also consider the pedestrian users of our streets simply reflects the need to balance priorities more equitably. Again, thanks for your feedback. Best, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner d 952 - 826 -0322 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ronald R. Rich [mailto:rrr @atmrcv.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:20 AM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad Millner; 'James Hovland'; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; 'Sprague, Josh'; 'Ann Swenson'; Mary Brindle (Comcast), 'ART Subject: RE: Public Comment on the "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" Mark: Thank you for including it and for your response. From the information I have seen so far, I still can't understand why additional neighborhood sidewalks has become a priority for Edina. 15 Was other safety, resident survey or important concerns I have not evaluated also used in the planning process? Do you understand (no matter the reason) why additional neighborhood sidewalks are a priority? Even knowing that you know the reasons) would be more comforting than what I understand now. Thanks again. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952- 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com From: Mark K. Nolan fmailto:MNolan@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 8:09 AM To: 'Ronald R. Rich' Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad Millner; 'James Hovland'; jonibennettl2(a)comcast.net; 'Sprague, Josh'; 'Ann Swenson'; Mary Brindle (Comcast); 'ART Subject: RE: Public Comment on the "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" Ron, Thank you for taking the time to put this response together. It will be included with other resident correspondence for Lhe Dec. 2 City Council meeting. Thanks again, Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 - 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 MNolan(a_EdinaMN.clov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ronald R. Rich fmailto:rrr(cbatmrcv.com] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 2:05 PM To: Mark K. Nolan Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad Millner; 'James Hovland'; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; 'Sprague, Josh'; 'Ann Swenson'; Mary Brindle (Comcast); 'ART Subject: Public Comment on the "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" Mark (and Others Copied): This e -mail is my public comment on the proposed "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" being considered for council approval Dec. 2. Please include it in the comments provided to City council - even though I am also copying the council members in case I am too late. I am e- mailing this from my work (see address below), but I reside at 7008 West Shore Drive, Edina; MN 55435 and have resided there since 1981. 1 have several engineering degrees and use engineering principles every day to collect, review, ;nterpret, and process data to justify the projects I propose and choose to pursue in my business. For those who choose not to read my explanatory information, I have the sentences highlighted in red will serve as a summary. 16 First of all, I really appreciate your (Mark's) discussion with me following the Nov. 3`d council meeting and your timely response providing me the presentation and some of the additional information for the rational behind the sidewalk issue and planning this week. I also want you and other City staff involved to understand that I believe the intent is to improve' Edina. Even if I may not agree all the time with the. beliefs about what constitutes those improvements. However, I always want beliefs to be supported by facts. As you are aware, I was informed about the sidewalk plans by a neighbor only 4 weeks ago. My primary concern initial about the planning process then was the lack of meaningful public information justifying the planning process and the lack of direct notification to those directly impacted. I approached the plan with an open mind; requesting only that the justifying data be e- mailed to me for my review. Especially because I was unable to attend the Nov. public meetings later scheduled where I understood supporting data would be presented to justify both the need for the sidewalks and the routes selected. I hoped facts backed up the claims for the four reasons mentioned in presentations to justify the project and to select the streets on which sidewalks would be installed. The data I requested was: 1. Clear proof there would be safety improvements on the streets on which the sidewalks would be installed, 2. Substantiation of the City's claims of overwhelming Edina resident support for additional sidewalks, 3. Meaningful consideration of the additional city wide and impacted resident costs including the affect on the changed character of the neighborhoods in which sidewalks would be installed, and 4. Justification for (not just presentation of) the criteria used to select the streets on which added sidewalks would be installed. I have had only a short time to review and digest both the material you sent. The majority of the information shared with me relates to recommendations of a 5' sidewalk plus a 5' buffer between the street and the sidewalk. This information is a design decision that should follow the determination of sidewalk plan merit. Even so, I have read all the information and tried understand those parts relateato the Edina neighborhood sidewalk planning and. selection process for which justification was expected. I-also appreciate that I may not have all the information the City has used or considered to justify-the sidewalk plan. But please remember, I did request all of it. And in my review I used both the information provided as. well as other Edina survey and accident information you did not mention or provide but is also available as part-of-the C, public records. The review of what I found: 1. There is little data supporting the claim of significant safety improvements on the streets on which the sidewalks would be imposed. a. General (non -Edina specific) evidence does exist that on "busy" urban streets fewer pedestrians are killed or injured when sidewalks are present. b. In every study I reviewed, the lowest average daily traffic volume street that met the definition of "busy" were defined as "minor collectors ". Lower volume roads were not considered "busy ". c. "Minor collectors" have typical average daily traffic volumes of 8,000 -9,000 cars per day. Streets are not normally classified as "minor collectors" if under 4,000 cars per day. d. The general safety studies do not apply if the streets are not considered "busy ". e. The average daily traffic volume on the Edina streets for which sidewalks would be imposed are all less than 4,000 cars per day. The highest indicated in the Nov. City presentation: 1,350 -3,650 for Barrie Road /Heritage Drive. Some as low as 425. 1,300 for West Shore Drive (actually varies between about 800 and 1,400 depending on study time). f. On streets with a traffic volume of less than 4,000 cars per day, no studies I found or received indicate that pedestrian deaths or injuries are a significant concern. g. 1,300 cars per day is an average of 54.2 cars per hour - less than 1 per minute. On West Shore Drive, this rate is typical except during rush hours (more traffic) and at night (less traffic). Experientially, West Shore Drive does not meet a reasonable definition of "busy ". h. On West Shore Drive in the Cornelia neighborhoods north and south of 70th Street, there appears to have been no reported incidents of pedestrian /car injuries or fatalities in the past 30 years (and possibly 17 earlier). I suspect, but don't have information to support, that other impacted neighborhoods have similar findings. I received no data supporting the City contention presented in the November neighborhood meetings that Edina has a "History of crashes involving pedestrians" (presumably on neighborhood streets without sidewalks). It appears there is no data - driven safety issue that additional sidewalks in Edina residential neighborhoods would actually address. If there is such data, it should be made public now. If data is lacking, I am unclear why safety concerns are being repeatedly cited as a reason for this project. 2. 1 was provided and found no valid data that supports the City contention of majority Edina resident support for sidewalks. a. Only one survey was cited at the Nov. 3 City council meeting indicating Edina resident support for added sidewalks. This was a "Quality of Life Survey ". The survey asked several general questions involving sidewalks without explaining their potential costs and consequences. b. Except for questions 47 and 150, all other sidewalk related questions in the survey cited actually indicate far less than 10 %.resident support for additional sidewalks. c. Question 56 of the cited survey asks the most applicable question; "Are there any types of development or redevelopment you would like to see in Edina ?" 49% responded "No "; 6% responded "Sidewalks ". d. Question 47 asks a question concerning a general "community" level of sidewalks in Edina. 58% answered "about right ". 2% responded "too many ". 41 % responded "too few". This means 60% wanted no additional sidewalks. e. Question 150 asks "What changes or improvements could the City of Edina make to improve your ability to get from place to place within the city by walking ?" No options for biking, public transport, ride share, or any other of a number of non - automobile transport alternatives. Only walking. The fact that 27% answered something other than sidewalks is amazing. And citing this single result as representative of majority resident sidewalk support is completely misleading. f. A subsequent "parks and recreation survey" was cited in the Nov. neighborhood presentations and e- mailed to me. The cited survey question actually asks "households that have a need for parks and recreation facilities" what they want in their parks. 85% say "walking and biking trails ". There is no survey question asking about additional neighborhood sidewalks (cr even trails) outside of Edina parks. g. A statement was apparently made by City staff at some of the Nov. neighborhood meetings that surveys of "millennials" indicated support of additional sidewalks in Edina. I received no information about that survey. Nor can I find any. h. About 90% of residents opposed additional sidewalks (about 50% responding) in 2009 when the Edina Public Works surveyed my neighborhood (Cornelia south of 70`h) about desired street improvements. The survey was not influenced by increased street assessment since these sidewalks were understood by most to be paid by all City residents. i. All similar neighborhood street improvement surveys taken in neighborhoods without existing sidewalks appear to have had similar results. j. These recent surveys were likely not affected by added assessed improvement costs either. k. Since City survey data consistently supports findings that most Edina residents do not want additional neighborhood sidewalks, I am unclear why resident support is being repeatedly cited. Survey data shows exactly the opposite. 3. There was no public information presented or any cited showing that the City has meaningfully considered the additional city -wide resident tax imposition or the city -wide impact of the sidewalks on the character of the neighborhoods. No information was provided_ on the additional cost and liabilities imposed on directly impacted residents either. A proper study — especially one that would directly affect Edina residents' property — needs to consider both the "pros" of a project along with the "cons ". 4. There appears to be no data - driven basis for the criteria used to select which streets on which additional sidewalks would be imposed. a. The 500 cars per day traffic volume criteria is almost 10 times below the accepted traffic engineering definition of a "busy" (presumably pedestrian unsafe) street. b. The 85th percentile speed greater than 30 mph criteria is not supported by any safety data provided or that I can find. In fact, such speeds are typical of most Edina neighborhood streets — whether sidewalks are to be imposed on those streets or not. c. It is unclear why the Active (Safe) Routes to School Plan would recommend streets that do not actually connect to schools. No supporting data is provided. 18 d. Since most children are bused or driven to school for their safety, it is even more unclear why safe routes to school are needed. No supporting data is provided. e. It is unclear what or even why "Parkicommercial" destinations were used to select streets. No supporting . data is provided. f. The claim that the routes selected "Supports a citywide pedestrian network that is data - driven" appears.to be based solely on unjustified traffic count and speed criteria (Items 4a. and 4b). ' 1. g. The streets on which sidewalks would be imposed appear to have been selected using criteria based primarily on two arbitrary traffic measures unsupported by safety data. Based on the relevant information I have received so far, the data does not justify the City's imposition of additional sidewalks in Edina neighborhoods. There are many possibilities why a public project with little apparent substantive justification or resident support proceeds anyway. Three come to mind: 1. This is a "pet" project of someone powerful that others must support — even when the facts are contrary. If so, this is very bad policy. 2. This is a "forward thinking" issue (past examples: "roundabouts" and "densification ") that City consultants and planners are convinced are "good for" Edina over the longer term. Even if residents don't want or appreciate such change. If so, residents should be properly informed what that plan is — not mislead. 3. The City has a hidden" agenda that includes these sidewalks as part of a grander plan. A plan that if widely known would result in substantial resident objection. More than objections to the sidewalk planning process. If so, this approach is dishonest. I really hope the City planning process becomes more transparent in the future. And that the actual information used to move plans forward made public. Mark, please remember that I do appreciate your efforts. I just don't understand why what appears to be an expensive and disruptive sidewalk plan is being pursued with so little apparent justification. In conclusion, given the information I have obtained to date, the "Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment" appears unjustified and should not be approved by council. Thanks. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com From: Mark K. Nolan [mailto:MNolan @EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 10:52 AM To: 'Ronald R. Rich'; 'James Hovland' Cc: 'Joanne'; Chad.Millner Subject: RE: Resident Input Deadline Help. Mr. Rich, Thanks for your email. This is also a response to your email sent on Thursday, Nov. 20. Regarding resident input (as stated in your email below): residents can provide input via email through today that will be included in the Dec. 2 Council packet; this is due to the holiday this week as Council packets must be prepared, 19 approved, and distributed ahead of time. However, you and your neighbors can provide input via email directly to Council at any time, including between now and Dec. 2. .dditionally, the online Speak Up, Edina! discussion is open until Nov. 30 (on the web page it states "Closes 2014 -11- 30"). Any input received via that site (we have received over 90 responses thus far) by the end of the day today will be included in the Dec.2 Council packet; however, the site will remain open for public comment through Nov. 30. You are correct in that Council closed the public hearing on Nov. 3, so testimony regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Plan will not be taken at the Dec. 2 meeting. Please recall that in addition to the online and email comments (I have received and responded to over 50 individual emails regarding this topic in the past two weeks), there have been two public hearings (at one of which you testified) and four public meetings held within the past month regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Plan. All of this input will be received by Council at their Dec. 2 meeting. The following are responses corresponding to the numbers in your Nov. 20 email: 1. 1 have attached the presentation from the Quadrant Input Meetings 2. In my previous email I provided you with a link to the 2013 Quality of Life Survey. I also referred to the Community Needs Assessment Survey, the results of which were presented to the Park Board last month. In that Park and Recreation survey, 85% of respondents stated that their household has a need for "walking and biking trails." The results of this survey — which indicates citywide support for increased walkability in Edina — can be found here (along with a video of the presentation): http : / /edinamn.gov /parkproiects. 3. Please refer to the following: a. MnDOT's'Minnesota's Best Practices for Pedestrian /Bicycle Safety' discusses preferred sidewalk and boulevard widths (see page 3 of the document): http: / /www. dot. state. mn. us /stateaid /trafficsafety /reference /ped- bike -ha ndbook- 09.18.2013 -v1. pdf b. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has conducted studies /reports that find that (in addition to reducing walking along roadway crashes) roadways without sidewalks can be more than twice as likely to have pedestrian crashes as roadways with sidewalks. Additionally, the FHWA states that "the wider the separation between the pedestrian and the roadway is, the more comfortable the pedestrian facility." Link with study references: http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /ped bike /tools solve /walkways trifold/ c. The FHWA also has stated that "a natural buffer [boulevard] provides the essential space needed for situations such as protecting pedestrians from out -of- control vehicles." Link: http: / /safety.fhwa.dot.gov /ped bike /univcourse /pdf/swlessl3.pdf d. According to Safe Routes to School guidelines: "The preferred minimum sidewalk width recommended for safe routes to schools is five to six feet." Follow this link: http: / /guide.safer.outesinfo.org /engineering /sidewalks.cfm e. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Architecture Barriers Act (ABA) guidelines state that sidewalks less than five feet in width are insufficient for wheelchair users to pass one another or to turn around (http: / /www. access- board.gov /ada- aba /final.htm #Surfaces) f. Attached is text from an email from the City of Edina's Public Works Director discussing their preference for a 5 -foot sidewalk width (for sidewalks that City crews maintain) and ample boulevard when possible: "It all boils down to the expectations of service within the community and in this case now it even borders on an unsafe condition. Please remember that this piece of equipment used for snow removal has a 55" width. Even though we have professional snowplow drivers, that are very good at what they do, that only gives them 2 % inches on either side of their machine. This doesn't change with a 5 foot sidewalk and a 6 -8' boulevard except that the equipment doesn't fall off of a barrier curb when they are plowing snow. I would be happy to show you the equipment some time but I really believe that the 5' width with a 1 foot strip would be an absolute minimum if we are to live up to the expectations of the community and plow this sidewalk." lank again for your questions and your input /interest, 20 #hri. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner �@ ' °` x 952- 826 -03221 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 . MNolanna EdinaMN.gov l www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ronald R. Rich fmailto:rrr @atmrcv.com] Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 5:20 PM To: 'James Hovland' Cc: 'Joanne'; Mark K. Nolan; Chad Millner Subject: Resident Input Deadline Help. Jim: am told residents will not be allowed to provide "input" on the "living streets" sidewalk issue after tomorrow or Tuesday ( "Speak Up Edina" says 11/20 — already passed). I also am told that no public comment will be allowed during the December 2 Council meeting vote on this issue. The City has poorly communicated and appears to have used very little meaningful data in presenting its case for sidewalks (and its consequences) to the affected residents so far. And the information provided on the "Speak Up" City website nowhere cites the basis for determining the "staff recommended" location criteria. Without the promised response from City staff to my questions, I will not be able to understand and share with my directly affected and angry West Shore Drive neighbors what might otherwise be a reasonable rational behind this plan. Please see what you can do to have the information e- mailed to me by tomorrow morning. Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952 - 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com . FYI, this is what I e- mailed Mark Nolan and copied you upon my return to the office last week: Mark: Thank you for your response to my questions - I was traveling and unable attend the meetings. Sorry I missed them. So I hope you can help. As you may recall, my concern is the process that has now lead to what appears to me to be a very unpopular plan. So I am trying to understand why the decisions were made and the information on which the decisions were based. For the Nov. 17 and 19 presentations, you promised me you would cite different studies than the one you referenced before — presumably studies that show majority resident support for new neighborhood sidewalks. I am most concerned because every other question relating to sidewalks in the very survey you cited --with the exceptions of question 150 and 47 — never show sidewalk support with more than a single digit percentage. And the questions never asked something like: "Would you be willing to support a sidewalk installed on your lawn" (regardless of who owns the right -of -way): So could you please attach (or provide a link to): 1. The presentation given at the meetings (presumably in PowerPoint) 2. The list of studies you may have referenced and a link to each indicating that Edina residents support additional neighborhood sidewalks 21 3. Documentation showing why a 5' spacing between the roadside and the proposed additional 5' sidewalks (a total of 10' of residential lawns) is the preferred sidewalk design. And links to the studies or reports that contain such recommendations. 4. Links to any other reports or studies helpful in understanding why sidewalks are being recommended Thank you for your help. Ronald R. Rich_ President Atmosphere Recovery, Inc. 7632 Washington Ave. S. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA Office: 952 - 941 -6500 Fax: 952- 941 -6518 Web: www.atmrcv.com �vostr This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. cv Nd 22 To: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item M VIII. B. From: Heather Branigin, Executive Assistant Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Select Date for 2015 Annual Meeting with Boards and Commissions Action Requested: That the Council select the date of Monday, March 23rd for the 2015 Annual Meeting with members.of the City's Boards and Commissions. If this date does not work for Council Members, an alternate date of Monday, March 9th is an option. Information / Background: • This is a dinner meeting to introduce newly- appointed advisory board, commission and committee members and'to recognize retirees. • This date does not conflict with evening advisory group meetings, spring break or religious holiday observance days. • Spring break is March 28th through April 5th. • Passover is observed from April 3rd through April I Id'. • Easter Sunday is April 5d'. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50dh.St • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor & Council Members A, o • �nMrtroRw'��`o • ,eee Agenda Item #: VIII. C. From: Heather Branigin Action N Executive Assistant Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: SELECT DATE FOR 2015 ANNUAL VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION Action Requested: That the Council select one of the following dates for the 2015 Annual Volunteer Recognition Reception: • Wednesday, April 29th • Thursday, April 30th Information / Background: • Exact time and location to be determined. • These dates do not conflict with evening advisory group meetings, spring break or religious observances. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda item #. VIII. D. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -155 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -155 City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -150 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Park Department: Edina Community Foundation $8,000 Edina Challenge Grant -inAid Dated: December 2, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , City Clerk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION �l To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #- VIII. E. From: Debra Mangen Action ❑ City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014 -22 Amending Chapters 4 & 24 Concerning Alcoholic Beverages And Conduct In Parks, Streets, Sidewalks and Publicly Owned Property Action Requested: Motion granting first reading and waiving second reading, adopting proposed Ordinance No. 2014 -22 concerning alcoholic beverages and conduct in parks, streets, sidewalks and publicly owned property. Information / Background: Staff recently became aware of a some "housekeeping" changes that were needed in current city code. The first involves the Art Fair in June. The 50th & France Business Association would like to host a beer garden featuring craft beer at the Art Fair. Since the Edina Grill has a Minnesota State Alcohol caterer's license issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety, the Association would like to have the Edina Grill cater the beer garden. In order to allow such service on public property, the following needs to be added to Edina's Code: "e. Alcoholic beverages may be consumed on premises holding a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license or a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to chapter 4, or a caterer's permit issued by the commissioner of public safety-and. which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24- 346." And "Sec. 24 -346. Special permits feF temp eraFy liquor liven The city council may issue a special permit to the holder of a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license or a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to chapter 4 or a caterer's permit issued by the commissioner of public safety for the purpose of occupying a park, street, sidewalk or publicly owned property with a licensed premises. Applications for a special permit shall be made on forms supplied by the clerk and shall include a plan drawn to scale which illustrates the exact location of the licensed premises and all proposed signs, including signs attached to vehicles, that will be used to identify the licensed premises or to promote the sale of alcoholic beverages. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in section 2 -724. In addition to the requirements of article II of chapter 12, no permit shall be issued pursuant to this section unless the following requirements are met:" City bf Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Also subsection 24 -254 has been modified to read Fred Richards which makes no change except to acknowledge that Fred Richards in no longer a golf course. Finally in order to allow-the Tin Fish to obtain an intoxicating liquor license subsections 4 -34 (d) and (e) need to be amended as shown below: "Section 4 -34, subsection (d) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (d) Wine licenses. In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, no wine license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the PCD -1, PCD -2, PCD -3 subdistricts, the mixed.'development district, the planned office district, -er the planned office district or for a restaurant on a golf course. Section 4 -34, subsection (e) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (e) On -sale intoxicating liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, no on -sale intoxicating liquor license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3, POD -2 subdistricts,-eF the mixed development district — __- _ab10ishea by hapt ?6., or on agolf- course." A draft if Ordinance No. 2014 -22 showing the proposed changes is attached for review. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -22 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 4 AND 24 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CONDUCT IN PARKS, STREET, SIDEWALKS, AND PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 4 -34, subsection (c) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (c) On -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, no on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license shall be granted for establishments other than: f IZP -private clubs which have been incorporated for more than ten years and which own and operate clubhouses for their members in which the serving of such liquor is incidental to and not the major purpose of such club: (21) Restaurants; (3 -2) Golf courses; (43) The Edina Golf Dome; (54) Bowling centers; and (65) Hotels. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION. The provisions of this subsection do not apply to temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses. Section 2. Section 4 -34, subsection (d) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (d) Wine licenses. In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, no wine license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the PCD -I, PCD -2, PCD -3 subdistricts, the mixed development district, the planned office district, -eF the planned office district or for a restaurant on a golf course. . Section 3. Section 4 -34, subsection (e) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (e) On -sale intoxicating liquor licenses. In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, no on -sale intoxicating liquor license shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3, POD -2 subdistricts_ the mixed development district as estab1ished by chapter 36 -. or on agolf- course. Section 4. Section 24 -254 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Sec. 24 -254. Conduct in parks, streets, sidewalks, and publicly owned property. No person, in any park, street, sidewalk or publicly owned property shall: Page 4 (1) Cut, break, scratch, mark or in any way injure or deface or remove any building, fence, post, pump, lamp, flagpole, construction work, improvement, facility or any other structure or property. (2) Post, paste, fasten, paint or affix any placard, bill, notice or sign upon any motor vehicle, structure, pole, tree, stone, fence, thing or enclosure, unless first authorized in writing by the city. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION (3) Pick or cut any wild or cultivated flower, or cut, break or in any way injure or deface any tree, shrub,or plant, provided that a property owner may prune trees and shrubs on the street right -of -way adjoining his property subject to the permission of the park director. Page 5 (4) Remove any wild flower, tree, shrub, plant, branch or portion thereof, or any soil or other material without the approval of the park director. (5) Go on foot or otherwise upon grass or turf where a prohibitory sign is posted. (6) Throw or cast any stone or other object, or aim or discharge any air gun, sling shot or other weapon except according to the rules of a game or recreation permitted in writing by the city. (7) Deposit, place or leave any paper, rubbish, waste, cans, bottles or refuse of any kind except in receptacles provided for the collection of waste. (8) Deposit, place or leave in publicly owned waste receptacles refuse generated from normal household or business activities. (9) Start or maintain any fire except small fires made by picnic parties in those locations in parks designated for that purpose by the city. (10) Abandon any fire made pursuant to subsection (9) of this section without completely extinguishing the fire and depositing the ashes or coals from such fire, after they have cooled sufficiently, in receptacles provided for waste. (1 1) Perform acts prohibited by article II of chapter 22. (12) Set, lay or prepare or use any trap, snare, artificial light, net bird line, ferret, hawk or any contrivance or device whatever for the purpose of catching, taking or killing any bird or wild creature. The prohibition in this subsection shall not apply to trapping by any means or methods REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 6 done by the city, or done under its direction, or done by any other governmental agency or department with the written permission of the city manager, or done by any person with a valid trapping license issued by the state and with the written permission of the city manager. All trapping shall be done in accordance with state law. (13) Start or land an airplane, helicopter, balloon or other aircraft without the written permission of the manager. (14) Consume intoxicating or nonintoxicating malt liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor, as defined in chapter 4, except that: a. 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is dispensed by the city or by an authorized agent of the city may be consumed subject to other applicable Provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 in the following places: I . Inside the clubhouse building or on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the clubhouse building at Braemar Golf Course and at Fred Richards Gel€ GeUFse. 2. Inside the Edinborough Park building,, the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum building, the building at Arneson Acres Park, the Edina Art Center Building, the Edina Senior Center and on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to such buildings. b. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city pursuant to a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued in accordance with chapter 4 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 within the confines of the ball field complex at Van Valkenburg Park. C. 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4 -2 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 7 may be consomed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 on the grounds of Braemar Golf Course. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4 -2 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24 -258 on the grounds of Fred Richards elf d. 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor and wine may be consumed at sidewalk cafes which are licensed in accordance with chapter 4 and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24 -313. e.. Alcoholic beverages may be consumed on premises holding a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license or a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to chapter 4, or a caterer's permit issued by the commissioner of public safety and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24 -346. (15) Destroy, injure or tamper with any sewer, storm sewer, water main, culvert or any part thereof, including manhole covers, tanks or valves. (16) Hitch any animal to a lamp post, hydrant, drinking fountain, tree or other structure or picket an animal to the ground. (17) Park or occupy a vehicle or occupy a street or sidewalk to sell any farm produce or any other product or property, or for conducting any business or selling of services, except as provided in section 24 -259. (18) Place any vehicle to display the vehicle for sale or exchange. (19) Work, grease, repair, change oil or maintain in any way a vehicle, except as necessitated by an emergency. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION (20) Use a skateboard, roller skates, in -line roller skates or blades, or similar devices a. In a municipal parking facility; b. On or across a sidewalk within or adjoining property in the PC- I, PC -2 or PC -3 districts, as defined by chapter 36; or C. Upon the traveled portion of a street. Page 8 Notwithstanding this subsection (20), roller skates or in -line roller skates or blades may be used on ` the traveled portion of streets, if no adjoining sidewalk is present. (21) Feed any wild animal or bird, or deposit a food source for wild animals or birds. Section S. Section 24 -346 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Sec. 24 -346. Special permits . The city council may issue a special permit to the holder of a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license or a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to chapter 4 or a caterer's permit issued by the commissioner of public safety for the purpose of occupying a park, street, sidewalk or publicly owned property with a licensed premises. Applications for a special permit shall be made on forms supplied by the clerk and shall include a plan drawn to scale which illustrates the exact location of the licensed premises and all proposed signs; including signs attached to vehicles, that will be used to identify the licensed premises or to promote the sale of alcoholic beverages. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in section 2 -724. In addition to the requirements of article ll of chapter 12, no permit shall be issued pursuant to this section unless the following requirements are met: (1) The city council shall find that the issuance of the permit: REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 9 1. a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare; b. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages; and C. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease.the value of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance. (2) No signs or symbols of any kind shall be used. to identify the licensed premises or product dispensed therein other than those specifically approved by the city council. (3) The permit holder shall indemnify and hold the city harmless from any loss, cost, damage and expense arising out of the holder's use, design, operation or maintenance of the property. The indemnity shall be on forms provided by the clerk. (4) The permit holder shall furnish to the clerk evidence that public liability insurance has been procured for any death or personal injury arising from the ownership, use, operation or maintenance of the property in the amounts of not less than: a. $100,000.00 for injury to or death of one person; b. $300,000.00 for any one incident; and c. $50,000.00 for damage to property arising from any one incident. The permit holder shall maintain such insurance in effect at all times during the term of the permit-The city shall be named as an additional named insured in the policy providing such insurance. f REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 10 (5) The permit holder shall furnish a surety bond, letter of credit or cash deposit in an amount determined by the city council but not less than $5,000.00 to be used by the city for the purpose of replacing or repairing any damage to public property caused by the permit holder's use. A surety bond shall be from a corporate surety authorized to do business in the state. The surety bond, letter of credit or cash deposit shall be released by the city upon completion of the repair or replacement of any damage to public property. . (6) The city council may impose other requirements and conditions necessary to promote public safety. . Section 6. This ordinance is effective upon adoption. First Reading: December 2, 2014 Second Reading: Waived Published: December 11, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please. publish in the Edina Sun Current on: December 11, 2014 Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. F. From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014 -23 Amending Chapter 18 Concerning False Alarms Action Requested: Adopt ordinance and waive seconding reading. Information / Background: The Fire Department is requesting an amendment to the existing language which limits fee recovery to "fire" alarms only. Requesting removal of the word "fire" from Section 18 -216. Definitions and Section 18 -217. Fee. This change will allow recovery in the event of other types of false alarms such as, carbon monoxide, natural gas, medical, and water flow alarms. Currently the Department is very limited in enforcing problems with these other monitoring systems. This would allow us a mechanism to ensure system problems are dealt with in a timely manner. Attachment Ordinance No. 2014 - 23 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 . ORDINANCE NO. 2014-23 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING FALSE ALARMS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 18, Division 6 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: DIVISION 6. FALSE FIRE ALARM RESPONSES Sec. 18 -216. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning- False fire -alarm means the receipt of and emergency response by the fire department to an audio or visual alarm or signal from an automatic -fie alarm device set off by causes other than the occurrence of a- firoman actual life safety hazard. Sec. 18 -217. Fee. A fee in the amount set forth in section 2 -724 shall be payable to the city for the second and each subsequent false €ire alarm within a 12 -month period. The fee for a false fir-e -alarm shall be payable by the owner of the building or premises from which the alarm was received and shall be payable within ten days after a statement therefor is mailed or delivered by the city. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon enactment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: December 2, 2014 Waived December 11, 2014 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on December 11, 2014 Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk To: I MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra "Mangen City, Clerk Date: December 2, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. W, _ t4A, ,oyLe 4 t!r,, Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information - ❑ City of Edina • 4801 W. 50Th St. • Edina, MN 55424 DOA '" � IS v DEFINING EXCELLENCE November 18, 2014 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 (952) 848 -3900 www.edina.k12.mn.us Once again, I want to take this opportunity to thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to attend Edina Public Schools' reception last evening in honor of our National Merit Scholarship students, their recognized teachers and their families. It was a pleasure to have you join us and say a few words of welcome. As always, I continue to appreciate your strong support of Edina Public Schools and our District community. �J NAYearly Planning\National Merit Reception \TY - Mayor.docx WE CARE ♦ WE DARE ♦ WE SHARE .o Heather Branigin From: David Bly <Rep.David.Bly @house.mn> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 4:06 PM Subject: The Next Regional Passenger Rail Meeting Attachments: RegionalLeadersLettertoMnDot DRAFT 2.doc We have scheduled our next meeting to pursue an advocacy group for regional passenger rail for Wednesday, December 3 at St. Olaf College. Please RSVP to save your seat at the table. Attached find a draft of a letter we hope will become the message we need to send to MnDOT expressing support for our Regional Passenger Rail Project. We will discuss this and entertain suggestions at the meeting, but our hope is to send participants home with a comment to encourage their communities to endorse and sign the letter. Thanks to those of you who participated in our October 16 regional leaders meeting for the inter -city regional passenger rail line through Northfield! We have 20 cities and 5 counties participating in this conversation to date and we are extremely encouraged by the overwhelmingly positive message we have received on this project thus far. Following the direction provided by participants in our October meeting, I am writing to invite you to a follow -up meeting for the regional passenger rail project. Please join us Wednesday, December 3 from 3pm to 5pm at St. Olaf College (the room number will be sent out in the next couple of days). Please respond to his e-mail with your availability or the name and contact info of your designee. Rep. David Bly [Letter to Minn Dol DRAFT Dear We the undersigned governmental entities have met to explore a common interest in pursuing inter -city regional passenger rail service from south central Minnesota to the Twin Cities on existing rail lines through Northfield. We unanimously support restored intercity regional passenger rail service between our south central Minnesota communities and the Metropolitan area, as well as the potential inter -state rail connections that our particular rail line would open for Minnesotans by virtue of the intersection of our line with 3 of Amtrak's most heavily trafficked inter -state lines, immediately to the south of us (Kansas City and Des Moines), and we feel strongly that this project presents sufficient merit as to warrant serious study for possible development in the next five years. The 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan identifies the Northfield — Metropolitan corridor for Tier II development (FN? in Technical Memorandum No. 3 at Sections 4.8 and 4.12 in particular). Elevation of regional rail service on one of the existing rail lines connecting Northfield to the Twin Cities to Tier One status for purposes of an evaluative preliminary study is more than justified by the forecasted levels of usage, the apparent technical and financial feasibility of this project in comparison to other proposed rail projects, and the enthusiastic support of the undersigned affected communities. We strongly encourage MnDOT to support immediate elevation of restored regional passenger rail service from south central Minnesota on existing rail lines through Northfield to Tier One status in the State's Rail Plan, to facilitate early study of that routing. Respectfully, Heather Branigin From: Morgan, Pierce <morganp0626 @my.uwstout.edu> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:05 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: save the woods I've been a member of the morning side community since i was 4 years old and have learned and developed in these woods. it would be a shame to sell this land and have it be turned into anything but the beautiful forest it is. There simply aren't any places like Weber forest. Kids have grown up in these woods and I can safely say I'm not the only one who would feel part of there childhood missing if something were to happen to these woods. Please keep these woods safe. thank you - Pierce Morgan morning side resident Heather Branigin From: Barbara Nelson <babsnelson57 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:55 PM To: Edina Mail; jan.callison @hennepin.us; cbremer101 @gmail.com Subject: Xeres Avenue Bumb outs This email is being sent on behalf of my mother, Mary Schopper, Edina resident. Mayor Hovland, Commissioner Callison: I attended the meetings prior to installation of bump outs. I didn't notice a majority of voters for installation. 1. What problem existed that demanded the installation and use of bump outs? 2. Did bump outs fix the problem? 3. Did bump outs do what white lines couldn't do? 4. Where else in Minneapolis and suburbs are bump outs installed? What company makes them? Did James Grube, Hennepin County Engineer or John Griffith, MN Department of Transportation actually see this bump out concept in use? How about Chad Ellos, P.E., Project Manager - Design? How was the bump out project financed? We seem to be the "laughing stock street" of the otherwise revered city of Edina. The leaves clogged the 10" space between the side walk and the bump out. How is the city going to make sure that problems is corrected? Thank you, Mary Schopper 5504 Xerxes Avenue Heather Branigin From: Mark Badenhoff <mwb1010 @yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20,2014 12:24 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Pete kielas; Brian Badenhoff Subject: Edina City Council Dear Mayor Hovland. As in Edina taxpayer, I was disappointed to read that you believe it's a good use of taxpayer money to line our city streets with sidewalks. Frankly, just because Millennials like sidewalks, doesn't justify the expenditure. Housing sales and values haven't suffered one bit because of the lack of sidewalks. If Millennials prefer sidewalks, they can move to communities that have them in place. I know you can respect the fact that taxpayers work very hard for our money, and are growing increasingly frustrated with government wasting our resources on needleless projects. Respectfully, Mark Badenhoff Heather Branigin From: Marge Fischer <Marge.Fischer @heart.org> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 201412:30 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Sidewalks - Edina Vote NO for sidewalks in Edina. We don't need them in residential neighborhoods. We moved to Edina because there were no sidewalks. Please repair the Edina streets rather than spending money on sidewalks. Marge Marge Fischer Administrative Associate, Communications Midwest Affiliate 4701 W 77'" Street I Minneapolis, MN 55435 Marae.flscherfteart.org I www.heart.org P 952.278.7909 www.heart.ora/lifeiswhy my family is why � American American Heart I Stroke Association Association life is why- 1 Heather Braniain From: Katie Stockwell <kat.stockwell @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:23 PM To: Mark K. Nolan; Edina Mail Cc: Jason Stockwell Subject: We support the sidewalks proposed for Edina Highlands Neighborhood Dear Mayor Hovland & Mr. Nolan - Just a quick note to show our support and gratitude for the proposed sidewalks in our neighborhood (Highlands). Several of our neighbors keep referencing the fact that a "majority" of the neighborhood doesn't want them citing a petition signed several years ago. However, we are "new" residents (as of Jan 2012) and we were never a part of any such petition and due to safety concerns and the overall value sidewalks would add to our neighborhood we STRONGLY support the proposed sidewalks. It's so frustrating to. have to tie ropes onto our kids' bikes and insist my preschoolers sit in a stroller vs. being able to walk (as they'd prefer) and get more exercise. We have even driven to other neighborhoods WITH sidewalks in edina just so I don't have to worry about the safety concern of my kids in the street. It was also one of the major drawbacks when we were contemplating a purchase in the highlands neighborhood. I would hate the for this fact to be a setback for any other families considering our quaint neighborhood in the future. Respectfully - Katie Stockwell Katie Stockwell Finding Your Element "Beauty isn't about looking perfect. It's about celebrating your individuality." -Bobbi Brown �I November 13, 2014 Mayor James Hovland The City of Edina 4801 W. 50'h St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor James Hovland, I am writing to you regarding the recent renovations that have been taking place at Braemar Ice Arena. I am a skater at the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club and have been for nine years. I wanted to thank you for the work you are putting in to make Braemar Ice Arena a better place for not only the skaters and hockey players, but also the staff that work at Braemar. I believe that the outdoor rink that is being built is going to be a great addition to Braemar. It will help improve the problem Braemar has struggled with in the past of not having enough ice time. It is also going to be exciting to have an outdoor rink, which is different from the other three indoor rinks that Braemar already has. In addition, I wanted to let you know how appreciative I am to be having our locker room redone. We have had the same locker room for a long time and it is nice to have a change. Braemar is home to a lot of great programs and the recent developments are going to help these programs continue to grow. Thank you Mayor James Hovland and City Council Members for supporting this effort Sincerely, Samantha Considine 9484 McGee Way Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Tq e -5- T J William P. Dunne 406 Point of France 6566 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 November 20, 2014 Dear Chief Schmitz, On Monday (11 /17) at 5:26 AM I had the misfortune to dislocate my right hip leaving me on the bedroom floor in excruciating pain. My wife called 911. In a reasonable amount of time, two of your Paramedic Staff was at my side administering a IV pain solution. This was a challenging task as my position was near a wall. Both men are professional in every sense of the word. I'm grateful for their knowledge, experience, and their warm and courteous manner. I feel badly I did not have the presence of mind to learn their names. Be well, Bill Dunne Heather Braniain From: laforcet @gmail.com on behalf of Tom LaForce <tom @laforceteamwork.com> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:37 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Valley View / Maddox Sidewalk Dear Mayor and Council Members, We want to offer another sidewalk perspective from the Birchcrest Neighborhood. As you know, Edina is carved up into quadrants by our highways. These highways represent limits for walkers. We tend to follow the outer limits of our neighborhood, which for us is 100, Vernon, Tracy, and 62. The railroad tracks also represent a major obstacle, that we typically choose to cross on Hanson and return on Valley View. The result is that we often find ourselves needing to walk on Valley View to cross the tracks. We then stay on MaddoxtValley View to maximize our walking distance within our neighborhood limits. It's the Valley View portion of the walk that feels a little risky. We encounter plenty of cars. They are going fast, and after dark they don't see us as evidenced by their last minute serves. Guess we should carry a flashlight. We are regularly pulling each other up onto the grass in the summer and squeezing against snowbanks in the winter. You've heard from residents who live on Valley View and Maddox (which are actually the same road) that this street has no destination. We see It differently. That stretch of road makes up the southern limit for walkers in our neighborhood. It also provides access to the SW quadrant via Wyman Ave. We appreciate that crossing because it expands our walking possibilities. It's interesting to note that from its start near Lake Cornelia, one could follow Valley View all the way into Chanhassen. How many other roads in Edina can claim to go that far beyond our boundaries? We strongly believe that Valley View and Maddox should remain on the map. We also ask that you reconsider your decision to remove the Valley View sidewalk from the Birchcrest B reconstruct If it's not done next summer, it likely will be at the tail end of the 20 -30 period, if it ever happens. And if it's eventually built as a standalone project, it will be more costly and create additional disruption. Thanks for your hard work in making Edina a better place for walkers. Best, Marie and Tom LaForce 5901 Tingdale Ave Heather Branigin From: Kathy Kelly <kkelly6788 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 21, 201410:06 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Dec 2 Council meeting agenda re: bicycles I spoke to a women at City Hall who informed me that the best way to communicate with you on the subject of bicycle lanes is via email as this item is on the Dec 2nd agenda (and the public meetings are over which I was unfortunately unable to attend). Thank you in advance for reading this and giving due consideration. As a bicyclist and concerned community member, I believe two potentially dangerous things have been overlooked when the bicycle lanes were implemented. The first. When bike lanes are placed on streets on which the pavement is cracked, missing, etc. at the curb line, the potential for an accident is great, and it is unlikely cyclists will remain in those lanes. Though this may be hard to see in winter weather, I can assure this problem exists on some streets. The solution, fix the streets (or remove the lanes). Second. The bike lane on West 70th, going East is a wonderful lane. The pavement is in tact and it is wide enough to ride along at a good clip. The problem is upon reaching the intersection where Metro Blvd comes in from the right. The lane continues through the intersection,marked by a dotted line, then BOOM!, the lane is no longer there and the cyclist is in the car lane. The first time I rode that I was fortunate to come to a red light at the intersection, so I wasn't moving through so fast. It's very dangerous to have a lane end without any warning. The dotted line gives one assurance that the lane continues. The solution, as there is no room for a bike lane to continue, at least post a sign that the lane ends, and remove the dotted lines. And, make this an example for the future of the need to think things through before implementing. All said, better planning is needed to avoid creating dangerous situations where they did not exist before the lanes were added. People still joke and shake their heads about the planning debacle on Wooddale. That too is an opportunity to learn from. Finallly, I offer to take you all, or any of you, on a bike ride through Edina to show you how it feels to ride some of the lanes. Next Spring of course. I hope to hear from you. - -Kathy Kelly 6513 Limerick Dr. Heather Branigin From: Johnson, Aya <AyaJohnson @mail.house.gov> Sent: Friday,- November 21, 201410:33 AM Subject: FW: Rep. Ellison Statement on President's Immigration Action Please see Congressman Ellison's statement below. Aya Johnson Community Representative Office of Congressman Keith Ellison (MN -05) 2100 Plymouth Ave North Minneapolis, MN 55411 Office: (612) 522 -1212 E -mail: ava.iohnson @mail.house.gov Website: www.ellison.house.gov From: Casca, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 7 :20 PM To: Casca, Mike Subject: Rep. Ellison Statement on President's Immigration Action Press Statement: Congressman Keith Ellison FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 20, 2014 Press Contact Mike Casca (202) 225-4755 Rep. Ellison Statement on President's Immigration Action MINNEAPOLIS —Rep. Keith Ellison (D -MN) released the following statement tonight after President Obama laid out his plan for taking executive action on immigration in a speech to the nation. "The action President Obama described tonight will bring relief to millions who live in fear of the knock at the door that could change everything. He joins President Ronald Reagan and President George H.W. Bush in taking executive action to keep families together. "It's been more than 50o days since the Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill that creates jobs and cuts the deficit, while bringing 11 million people already contributing to our communities out of the shadows. Families shouldn't be torn apart because House Republicans refuse to act to fix our broken immigration system. "Politics too often stands in the way of what is right. The president's action is a first step towards fixing an immigration system that is inhumane and cruel. I proudly stand with President Obama and the millions of people who will be helped by his leadership." Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: CITIE9�p rsw�e.uxwwawa �y,.cry City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, 55424 MN United States 18 November, 2014 ICLEI Secretary General's Office <secretary.general @iclei.org> Friday, November 21, 201410:07 AM James Hovland Invitation to join the Compact of Mayors and ICLEI's Members Survey on Compact Compliance Compact of Mayors-FAQ for Cities.pdf UCLA United Pities and Loot Govrtntinents c7m�n,mcnt` Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland, On September 23, 2014, the Compact of Mayors was launched at the UN Secretary General's Climate Summit in New York City by the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40), ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability ( ICLEI), and United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) — endorsed by UN- Habitat, UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change, UN Secretary General's Climate Change Support Team.. The Compact of Mayors is an ambitious agreement by mayors and other city officials to publically commit to deep GHG emissions reductions -- making existing mitigation and adaptation targets and plans public and report on their progress annually -- using a newly- standardized measurement system that is compatible with international practices. Through this initiative, cities will be choosing to meet the same requirements proposed for the international climate negotiations that will lead to a global climate treaty in 2015. In our capacity as the Management Committee of the Compact of Mayors, we are writing to formally invite you to join this movement of mayors in this unprecedented effort to aggregate the significant action that cities like yours are already undertaking globally. Data collected through the Compact of Mayors will become the evidence base we need to quantify the greenhouse gas impact of city action with the aim of: Allowing national governments to understand the extent of existing city action so that it might be incorporated Into national level strategies or further supported through more enabling policy environments and resourcing approaches Encouraging increased capital flows into cities to support local action Establishing a consistent and transparent accountability framework that can be used by national governments, private investors or the public to ensure that we can be held responsible or our commitments Data collected through the Compact will underscore the importance of considering cities' climate efforts as nations set GHG reduction targets with the ultimate goal of reaching an ambitious, binding, international climate agreement. Under the Compact, the carbonn Climate Registry will serve as the designated central repository that will enable the compilation of data through existing national, regional, and global city reporting platforms, such as CDP Cities. We are also in early stages of exploring the possibility of aligning with other reporting platforms such as the European Covenant of Mayors— with the overall goal of reducing the need for cities to report more than once. We will work collaboratively to aggregate these individual efforts across thousands of cities who make up C40, ICLEI and UCLG with the aim of capturing their global impact. Over the coming weeks, our teams will be reaching out to your city with more information about the Compact of Mayors, including how to engage in this voluntary reporting effort in the lead up to 21St Conference of the Parties (COP 21) in Paris in December of 2015, and ways to access limited technical assistance. In the mean time, we kindly request that you complete this brief survey on GHG accounting and climate mitigation and adaptation planning in your city. Your participation will provide valuable information to enable us to better support local governments in becoming compact compliant. If you or your city has any immediate questions regarding the Compact or the survey, please contact carbonn@iclei.ore. Sincerely, Mark Watts, Executive Director, C40 r Gino Van Begin, Secretary General, ICLEI Josep Roig, Secretary General, UCLG C40 J, C'L ; E. I U C LG Local G°v��,er,t6 CITIES CUMATELECEA51RPGRDYP aoeluos,org United Cities and Local Governments for Sustainability Compact of Mayors FAQ for Cities "Compact of Mayors — the biggest collaboration to accelerate climate action" What is the Compact of Mayors? The Compact of Mayors is the world's largest cooperative effort among mayors and city officials to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, track progress and prepare for the Impacts of climate change. Why Should I join the Compact of Mayors? Cities should join the Compact of Mayors to demonstrate and accelerate the collective impacts of local climate action. By showcasing your city's climate action and commitments on a publicly accessible platform, the Compact of Mayors accelerates ambitious, transparent and credible climate action and positively contributes to the new international climate regime to be adopted by 2015. What will the Compact of Mayors do? The Compact of Mayors will drive more aggressive city climate actions and reaffirm existing targets while capturing the significance of these efforts through a consistent, transparent public reporting of cities' climate data. The data collected through the Compact of Mayors will become the evidence base we need to quantify the greenhouse gas impact of city action with the aim of: • Showing national governments the extent of action cities are already undertaking, so that it might be incorporated into national level strategies or further supported through more enabling policy environments and resourcing approaches; • Encouraging increased capital flows into cities to support local action; • Demonstrating the commitment of city governments to contribute positively towards more ambitious, transparent, and credible national climate targets by voluntarily agreeing to meet standards similar to those followed by national governments; and • Establishing a consistent and transparent accountability framework that can be used by national governments, private investors or the public to ensure that we can be held responsible or our commitments. Now do I sign on to the Compact of Mayors? The Compact of Mayors is not a signatory campaign. To join the Compact, your city must first become "Compact compliant" by undertaking the following steps: Compact Compliance: — Register "City Climate Commitments" (targets for GHG emissions reduction and commitment to adapt to climate change); — Report annually on progress towards achieving GHG emissions reduction targets and assessing climate hazards, using standards established through City Networks; and — Disclose this information publicly by reporting through a recognized city platform (carbonn Climate Registry or CDP Cities) Intent of Compact Compliance: - For cities not yet prepared to report a full inventory or hazard profile, Mayors may choose to indicate "Intent of Compact Compliance" by registering "City Climate Commitments," and report on progress towards meeting those targets within 1 year. Where do I register and report my climate commitments and action? Under the Compact, the cities may continue to report through existing city climate reporting platforms, including CDP Cities and carbonn. The carbonn Climate Registry will serve as the designated central repository that will enable the compilation of data through existing national, regional, and global city reporting platforms - mitigating the need to report your city's climate data more than once. What methodology will be used to standardize all Compact- related climate data? To ensure a consistent and transparent way to measure emissions which conforms with IPCC national guidelines, the Compact of Mayors will use the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) -- the world's most widely- endorsed GHG accounting and reporting standard for cities. For climate risks and adaptation data, a new framework is currently being developed. Are there resources available to my city if we wish to become "Compact compliant" but need local training or technical assistance to do so? C40, ICLEI and UCLG are currently working to identify resources to support those cities that wish to become compliant with the Compact of Mayors, but need technical assistance and /or increased local capacity to do so. Please contact us with your interest. Does the Compact of Mayors address climate mitigation and adaptation? Yes, the Compact of Mayors asks cities to voluntarily track commitments or targets for both greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions and climate risks. Who developed the Compact of Mayors? The development of the Compact of Mayors was led by C40, ICLEI, and UCLG, In close collaboration with the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change, UN Habitat, and the UN Secretary General's office. A number of cities and city organizations were consulted directly throughout this process. Where can 1 find more information about the Compact of Mayors? You can find out more by writing to us or visiting our websites. Our contact details are below: • C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group : www.c40.org / contact @c40.org • ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability Bonn Center for Local Climate Action and Reporting — carbonn Center : www.iclel.org / www.carbonn.org / carbonn @iclei.org • United Cities and Local Governments : www.uclg.org / info @uclg.org Heather Branigin From: David Bly <Rep.David.Bly @house.mn> Sent Friday, November 21, 20141:39 PM Subject Re: The Next Regional Passenger Rail Meeting Here is the location for the Rail meeting and a link to the St. Olaf College interactive map: Location: Viking Theater in Buntrock Commons Enter Buntrock Commons main entrance. Viking Theatre will be on your right next to the Bookstore. Parking is available immediately outside Buntrock Commons at the top of the St. Olaf Hill. Campus map: http://www.stolaf.edu/map/- Entrance to the campus is either on the South via MN Highway 19 off of I -35; or from the East on St Olaf Ave. off of MN Highway 3. > > > David Bly 11/18/2014 4:06 PM > > > We have scheduled our next meeting to pursue an advocacy group for regional passenger rail for Wednesday, December 3 at St. Olaf College. Please RSVP to save your seat at the table. Attached find a draft of a letter we hope will become the message we need to send to MnDOT expressing support for our Regional Passenger Rail Project. We will discuss this and entertain suggestions at the meeting, but our hope is to send participants home with a comment to encourage their communities to endorse and sign the letter. Thanks to those of you who participated in our October 16 regional leaders meeting for the inter -city regional passenger rail line through Northfield! We have 20 cities and 5 counties participating in this conversation to date and we are extremely encouraged by the overwhelmingly positive message we have received on this project thus far. Following the direction provided by participants in our October meeting, I am writing to invite you to a follow -up meeting for the regional passenger rail project. Please join us Wednesday, December 3 from 3pm to 5pm at St. Olaf College (the room number will be sent out in the next couple of days). Please respond to his e-mail with your availability or the name and contact info of your designee. Rep. David Bly To: Edina City Council Re: Southeast quadrant sidewalks - specifically West Shore and the Active safety Route. Date: November 22, 2014 Dear Council Members: Attached Is an executive summary by resident Russ Nelson of a viable, workable and extremely attractive alternative to the West Shore Drive designation an Active School Safety Routes. The proposal was summarized to Mayor Hovland on November 20, 2014 at the public hearing and acknowledges that children are using east -west streets and not a West Shore to 7&h route. Hence, the best way to achieve the connectivity and safety desired by the Active Safety School Routes program is to design a route using Dunham, Wooddale and Claremore(see map). This Intersects with the most cross streets, is closer to the school and provides sidewalks where the kids would actually use them. West Shore is a kind of dangling piece that does not connect to the school at all. The advantages of this proposal range from being the safest and most direct route to being more environmentally friendly. Mr. Nelson has detailed more of these advantages and has also has Included supporting references and materials in his complete packet to the council. We the undersigned support this alternative. NAME S010,N WE uC- /Uk �7�i rJC�C,e h ADDRESS `-7 o o l w e�s-r Sf o r b Cp7toc�t� 70c)6 7UO g S�- C dd16 W Svu- 7,o zbo w. Recommendation Concerning West Shore Drive Proposed Sidewalk from 7011 to Hibiscus Comment by: Russell Nelson, 7117 West Shore Drive Executive Summary: Edina Active Routes to School should be the most safe and most used sidewalks to get children safely to school. West Shore Drive is a north/south street that does not bring students directly to school and is likely to not be used by Cornelia students. West Shore Drive should not be designated as an Active Route to School. East/west streets should be used to get more students quickly and safely to school. Dunham would be used to collect students from the neighborhood west of West Shore Drive. A current path from A.spasia Circle feeds people into Dunham. Wooddale from Gilford to Claremore Dr would collect students and feed them into Claremore and directly to school. This is the shortest route to Cornelis School and would potentially be heavily used. I r. . pRiiM 1 Proposed Active Route to School ' *ice _ K e rl Ni, ff��.. i•22i'' /ma/-�.�yy, ��1�c�Y�ijfa{� ' r ur✓- - .r t X' ak 3 c $� U A k..x 1� �$ 'n p4;= YIif1:'�F' - 71.1h, x proposed active route to school ft 94- i 3 g _ Nssenon roa i g Ii --1:,_' "y!!RR ,��5S yW70W5! Rio w YAW sr ak 3 c $� U A k..x 1� �$ 'n p4;= YIif1:'�F' - 71.1h, x proposed active route to school ft 94- i 3 g _ Nssenon roa i g w YAW sr x proposed active route to school Details and Facts: "Edina Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan" (version October 2013 adopted by the city council in 2014) - Does not desimate West Shore Drive as an "Active Route to School ". - In Exhibit 10 (copy enclosed) West Shore Drive is shown as a proposed sidewalk with the same code as the sidev"-alk on the east side of France Avenue. - There is no coding in the legend of Exhibit 10 showing any "Active Route to School ". - On page 1 is found "no route can truly be made to be `safe "'. - On page 14 (copy enclosed) the Cornelia staff did not mention West Shore Drive as street needing sidewalks. - On page 13 (copy enclosed) there is no mention of any pedestrian or bicycle crash in the Cornelia neighborhood in 10 years of a child that would attend Cornelia. - The study on page 22 (copy enclosed) recognizes sidewalks are opposed by residents and the sidewalks were removed from the proposed projects in the past. - The study on page 23 (copy enclosed) states 58% of the respondents to a survey (copy enclosed) think there are about the right amount of sidewalks in the city. - Recommendations of the plan on pages 24, 29, 30, and 31 do not mention anything about sidewalks on West Shore Drive. Other factors to consider: - Children and students try to take the shortest route to school (remember when you were in college). - The shortest route to Cornelia School is not West Shore Drive going north to 70 "' and then east to Cornelia. - The shortest route to Cornelia School is east on Dunham, north on Wooddale, and then east on Claremore. - The sidewalks on Dunham and Wooddale would use a smaller amount of concrete than the proposed West Shore Drive sidewalks. - The Dunham/Wooddale sidewalks would be more environmentally friendly. - The 2013 residential survey conducted by Decision Resources, Ltd. in question 149 (copy enclosed) states 86% of the respondents rate the current "ease of getting from place to place within the city of Edina by walking" as excellent or good. Heather Branigin From: Doyle Bizily, Tara <Tara.DoyleBizily @allina.com> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:21 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Baechler, Courtney Subject: City Sidewalks Dear Mayor Hovland, Councilors Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson, We are writing to express our support of the city's current Sidewalk Facilities Map and Comprehensive Plan criteria for establishing new sidewalk routes. As physicians, we are reminded on a daily basis of the ways In which the environment impacts our patients' health. The ability to have safe walking routes is a critical component of many of people's ability to exercise. Walking is a low cost and convenient way to increase physical activity. On as daily basis, each kilometer walked is associated with a 5 percent reduction in the likelihood of obesity. Having safe, complete streets is imperative to our community's overall health. As Edina residents, we ask for your support in improving Edina's health and for your yes vote on the sidewalk plan. Sincerely, Drs. Courtney Baechler and Tara Doyle Bizily Courtney Baechler, MD, MSCE Penny George Institute for Health and Healing 4601 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Tara Doyle Bizily, MD AllinaHealth Clinics 4212 Oakdale Ave S Edina, MN 55416 This message contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Heather Branigin From: Dick/Bernie Letsche <rbletsche @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 4:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Attention: City Council and Engineering I am in receipt of your letter dated November 20, 2014, indicating that the estimated cost per assessable lot is now $12,507. At the public meeting on July 28, 2014, we were told the assessment cost was estimated to be between $9,100 and $11,400. Why the difference? Also in your letter of November 20, why are the following addresses not included in the area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement? 7431 Hyde Park Lane 7429 Hyde Park Lane Richard W. Letsche 7435 Hyde Park Lane 952 -944 -2464 rbletscheCcr�.comcast. net Heather Branigin From: Becky <briggsmin @aol.com> Sent: Friday,'November 21, 2014 5:41 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Re: 4505 Arden Avenue Ann, Thank you for your quick response. I had heard that the house had been determined to have a bad foundation. I also understand that the house was deemed to be in good shape and with a good foundation a few years back. I don't have any reason to doubt this contractor except that I have seen other houses deemed unfit after a contractor had through intentional negligence then been — Original Message — From: James Hovland <JHovland(@EdinaMN.gov> To: 'Briggsmin(@aol.com' <Briggsmin(ZD-aol.com> Sent: Tue, Nov 4, 2014 8:17 am Subject: RE: 4505 Arden Avenue Becky, the house that is being built is the plan that the HPB approved. The city determined that the foundation was not safe to be rebuilt upon. Ann Swenson Sent from my iPad From: Briggsminna.aol.com rmailto:BriggsminAaol.coml Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 1:40 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 4505 Arden Avenue Dear Mayor and City Council, I was very disturbed to see that the house at 4505 Arden was recently razed without using the process that has been set up for demolition of houses in the Country Club District. I understand that there had been several meetings with the Heritage Preservation Board (HPB) over the past four years and they had approved that the back of the house could be opened up for an addition but that the front of the house would be preserved. Through the Edina Heritage Preservation Board's Plan of Treatment process both sides of the issue had their voices heard and a determination was made on the fate of the home, the front would stay and the back could be removed. What disturbs me when I see the house torn down is that the neighbors were not informed of the demolition and the process outlined in the Heritage Preservation Board's Plan of Treatment was not followed. In the Edina Heritage Preservation Board's "Certificate of Appropriateness Application" the requirements state that "The City will send notices to neighboring property owners and other appropriate parties, as determined by the City". This did not happen in this case and there is no reason that it should not have. No neighbor, whether in Country Club or elsewhere in Edina, should come home to unexpectedly find a hole in the ground where a house used to stand. The HPB's Plan of Treatment also clearly lays out a process that is supposed to be followed that in the case of 4505 Arden was not. The Heritage Preservation Board recognizes that there can be "a significant potential impact by new construction can have on the historic character of the District" and therefore lays out a process to be followed that also includes an appeal of the HPB decision. Again, this process was not followed which should be disturbing to everyone in the district whether they felt the house should be demolished or not. The process is there to protect District residents and typically one of the biggest investments each of us have made, our home and its value. Respectfully submitted, Becky Briggs 4509 Browndale Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin From: Ryan Gordon <ryandgordon @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 201412:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering Dear City of Edina Engineering Representative, I'm a resident in Edina's Countryside H neighborhood and received the Notice of Public Hearing for our neighborhood's roadway reconstruction project proposal and hearing. I will not be able to make the public hearing at the City Council meeting on 12/9. But I do have a question that was not addressed (or if it was, was not easily visible) in the November 2014 Engineering Study report. The proposed project cost communicated earlier this year was estimated to be between $8,600 - 10,900 per REU. Yet, in the most recent communication, the proposed project cost, funded through special assessment, is $11,732/REU. This proposed cost is also at the upper end of the Public Hearing Assessment costs for past completed roadway reconstruction projects. I would like to know what factors contributed to this higher proposed project cost compared to the earlier estimate and the cost from other neighborhood's in Edina that went through roadway reconstruction. Thank you, Ryan Gordon Ryan Gordon Mobile: 952 - 923 -7182 Email: ryandgordon @hotmail.com some of the "free sidewalk money" to do a better job of snow removal on the sidewalks the city already maintains. In an article in the Minneapolis newspaper the mayor is reported to have said that Edina isn't going to change course on a transportation plan that has been in the works for 10 years. For over 9 and a half years that plan was unknown to residents of Maddox Lane. The surveys, so often cited by the city planners, did not include anyone living on our street. If the uproar over closing the golf course was not heard by city government, then I fear that our concerns have slim hope of impact. I just hope that the mellenials, with their supposed vision of utopia, bring their shovels when they move in. It's a long winter we have here. z Heather Branigin From: deanne dubbs <ddubbs @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 201412:18 PM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: Opposition to Maddox Lane Sidewalks To: Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, There are some serious flaws in the way Maddox Lane was chosen for the Comprehensive Sidewalk Plan. To assume that a high volume of car traffic is a indicator of pedestrian usage is the most glaring. The city engineer, Mark Nolan, admitted at the November ' 17 th sidewalk community meeting that the city has the capability to study pedestrian counts on streets but feels it is not cost effective to do so. The Wyman Bridge is not a pedestrian destination. There is nothing enticing people to walk either direction over the bridge. The bridge is used by cars in our neighborhood to access Hwy 100 south since the interchange at Benton Ave. only allows for northbound entry. A sidewalk on our street will not attract walkers as there in no destinations in our neighborhood, just blocks and blocks of homes. If you placed the sidewalk in the center of the Birchcrest neighborhood it would at least be more easily reached by a majority of residents rather than placing it at the very edge on Maddox Lane. Since the snow season started on November 1 O'h this year, I have only seen one person with their dog on Maddox Lane. If it were truly concerned about the safety of the residents the city officials should realize the dangers of residents who would be risking their health to keep sidewalks clear of snow and ice. Risks of falls and heart attacks are dangers not to be overlooked. The city mayor claims that it needs to attract the millennial generation to live in Edina. With all the tear -downs and high home prices it would seem that the city is doing just fine attracting new residents. Does the city not have a duty to care about it's current residents? Long time neighborhood residents have knowledge and wisdom that the city would be foolish to ignore. The sidewalk on Tracy Ave. as it goes up the hill to the high school is plowed by the city but of the three pedestrians I have seen on the hill since November 10th, two were jogging in the street. Only one person used the icy sidewalk. Maybe the city should use developer is hammering home the moral high ground of providing 'affordable housing' to the community, is that by including affordable housing, it guarantees 20% of their financing. Implementing the affordable housing mandated by the MET council would be best done spread around the city - not in huge swaths. Thank you for all the time you have collectively put into serving this community, and thank you for taking the time to read my comments and concerns. I hope you heed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and city staff and turn down the proposed development, and hold the developer to the current Comp Plan requirements. Sincerely, Collin Nelson 4516 Hibiscus Ave Edina, MN 55435 c) 901/598 -0633 collin.nelson@gmail.com Heather Branigin From: Collin Nelson <collin.nelson @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 8:41 AM To: Edina Mail; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Concerns from a Resident - 7200 France Development Please forward this message to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the Mayor and all members of the City Council Members of the city government - I am a new resident to Edina, but am very familiar with the city and the area, with my wife having grownup here. She attended Cornelia elementary, the same school that our 2 children will attend. We bought our home as a long -term investment in a well established community where we would raise our kids and get involved in civic activities. I wanted to express some concerns and opinions I have regarding recent and upcoming decisions by the city council. -Fred Richards Golf Course closing: An unfortunate decision, but what's done is done. You can spin the election results how you want, but I firmly believe that this past election was a referendum on the choice to close The Fred without taking the time to solicit and factor in the feedback from your constituents. Mr. Sprague will not be on the council in the next term, and if Ms. Bennett had sought re- election, I believe her fate would have been the same. Please perceive these election results as a'shot across the bow,' and take the next two years to repair your relationship with the citizens of Edina. -7200 France Development: The current proposal by the developer is far outside the parameters of the existing Comprehensive Plan, and by no means warrants any type of variance. There are multiple reasons why there is a need to hold to the plan, which are 1. Public Works loading - building a structure this size would definitely put a drastic increase on public works as far as stormwater runoff and sanitary sewer treatment needs. Who is going to pay for any needed upgrades to the utilities? 2. Population density - For the proposed target demographics of the rental units, there would be an influx of school age children into the Cornelia school. Is the school able to handle this surge of new students? 3. Cut through traffic on Cornelia, 72nd, and West Shore - this is the issue that is most important to me. Any redevelopment of the existing structure to include housing would increase this traffic, but a building of this size and composition (offices, retail, and housing) would generate a massive increase in traffic on these residential streets. Anyone who thinks that putting the retail entrance on France, making sure residents can only exit east on to 72nd, or "encouraging the residents to be good neighbors" as was proposed at the city council meeting I went to this summer, is either ignorant, stupid, or both. We chose the location of our house because it was tucked away off of main traffic thoroughfares, and would allow our kids to play in the neighborhood and perhaps walk to school without having to cross any major roadways. Now I'm not so sure. 4. Increased traffic stoppages on France Ave - This development would likely require another stoplight on France Ave, further hampering traffic flow on the street. I'm sure the city engineering dept would love to cut up their newly re -done roadway as well. 5. Qui Bono? There are three interest that stand to benefit the most from the proposed development - The developer, the contractor, and the real estate interest. The nearby community is not among that list. There is an abundance of apartment housing available in the Cahill and Edinborough areas, and if you're looking for affordable single family homes, they're knocking them all down along Wooddale Ave. The only reason that the Heather Branigin From: gbgriffiths @mac.com Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: George Griffiths Organization: Website: Address 1: 4444 Dunham Drive Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 554354140 Email: gbjzriffiths@mac.com Phone: 952- 922 -2744 Referrer: about town or other city _publication Message: Edina City Council Members - Edina HRRC Members The City of Edina has requested public input on changing the name of Columbus Day in response to an advisory memo from the Edina Human Rights and Relationship Commission because Columbus "perpetuated extreme cruelty and violence again the Indigenous Peoples." The City Council has to decide whether to recognize Columbus as the discoverer of the New World and continue to commemorate and celebrate this fact or to condemn Columbus for his actions which were the law of the land in the Old World before he discovered the New World. I strongly recommend that City Council and HRRC members research the Doctrine of Discovery and the history of the Native American's treatment after the death of Columbus in 1506. The Doctrine of Discovery became the law in the United States in 1823. As recently as 2005 the Doctrine of Discovery was the basis for the United States Supreme Court ruling against the Oneidas. Today the Doctrine of Discovery is alive and well as the issue if racism and exploitation of Native American sports mascots continues to flood the media. To paraphrase a definition of war - we have met the perpetrators and they are us. Not Columbus but the immigrants who left the Old World and subdued the indigenous people of the New World are to blame for the extreme cruelty and violence. Perhaps they were some of our relatives! George Griffiths 11/25/2014 I would like to get a fuller picture of the issues re: walking trails and sidewalks. Someone at the Mon meeting said she wanted trails not sidewalks. Is that what lead to the confusion and chaos? Please help me better understand this, Thanks Diane Heather Branigin From: Mark K. Nolan Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:59 PM To: 'davies @visi.com' Cc: Chad Millner, Janet Canton; Edina Mail Subject: RE: replying to Strategic plan request Diane, Thank you for reaching out regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map and sidewalk planning in Edina. Your email will be included with other resident correspondence for the City Council for their Dec. 2 meeting. If you wish to discuss your questions directly, please feel free to call me at 952 - 826 -0322 and we can discuss. Thanks again, tY sl. Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner 952 -828 -03221 Fax 952 - 828-0392 MNolanQEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.00v ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Diane Davies [mailto:davies(alvisi.coml Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 7:24 AM To: Janet Canton Subject: replying to Strategic plan request Hi Could you please send me a summary of the research that has been done so far. I attended a meeting re: sidewalks this week and was surprised to discover that one of the neighborhoods slated to get sidewalks had told the City years ago that they did not want sidewalks and that they still do not want sidewalks. In the MPLS Trib a reference was made to research saying Milennials want sidewalks. Please send the references. At the "Sidewalk discussion meeting "this past week one millennial said she preferred to run and bike on the street because it was better for her knees, the other millennial who spoke said wanted sidewalks (eventhough her property would not be getting a sidewalk.).. It was mentioned that there had been 3 surveys of Edina residents, all since I moved here in 2009. When I asked how I didn't receive any of the surveys I was told it was a random survey. It was pointed out by another resident attendee that the surveys were not done in a statistically scientific way and he recommended that Edina conduct a comprehensive survey and engage all residents.. I am very confused about what has been done, what the results are and what the plans are going forward. Many people left the meeting this week feeling that they don't get the opportunity for input and that the City just does what it wants without communicating with the residents. wa �W Heather Branigin From: Marge Fischer <Marge. Fischer@ heart.org > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:05 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Lawn ruined by snow plow Attachments: photo 4 (2)JPG Every winter our lawn is damaged by your snow plowing. Last summer we had new sod laid and now the front yard is ruined again. Why send in such large plows on residential streets? We would appreciate it, if our lawn is repaired with new sod and not seeded as some lawn were last summer. Also forgot about sidewalks, we don't need them and we don't want them 11 Repair the Edina streets first. Marge Marge Fischer Administrative Associate, Communications Midwest Affiliate 4701 W 77" Street I Minneapolis, MN 55435 Marae.fischeK - heart.ora I www.heart.ora P 952.278.7909 www.heart.org /Iifeiswhy my family is why 00- American American Heart I Stroke Association Association® life is why- 1 was transparent. The alternative is the Council telling us what we need, as in the prior paragraph, whether we truly need it, want it, or not. Example, neighborhood is what it is. This neighborhood was never designed or built to include sidewalks. You can retrofit it to do anything but it changes the aesthetics and feel of the neighborhood. A sidewalk neighborhood is not what I bought into 20 years ago. For those that believe they can't live without sidewalks there are sidewalk neighborhoods. That would be Country Club, Morningside, Minneapolis and more. We are not that. Example, consistency. For 60 years this neighborhood has not had sidewalks. We had a child who went through Cornelia, walked everyday and no problems. She walked to friends houses for years, no problems. She biked to neighbors houses, to the park, to the pool on streets with no sidewalks. Still no problems. Her friends did the same with no problems. What you propose is basically the answer to a question virtually no one asked. It is a solution to a problem no one knew we had. I was, in fact, kind of happy to buy into a house that had no sidewalks, even though I grew up with sidewalks, I knew that at least I had a lot less work to do. I've thought about that every year when it snows and been happy with that. Example, West Shore Highway. If WS somehow ends up with a sidewalk it would be in the same category as France Ave, 76th Street, and 70th Street. Whereas WS is residential, the other streets in the same class are heavily used commercial streets. Thus, is there a plan to tie WS in to the future development at Pentagon Park? Are you planning a back way in and out for all the future residents and commercial traffic down WS? There are clearly many issues that have not been addressed, researched, explained, or thought through. This has been rushed. If Council votes for this sidewalk in spite of all the problems and objections the result is a installing a sidewalk in 4% of the neighborhood. One way to somewhat mitigate that is to compensate us. The City can amend it's rules to fix any problems down the road with the sidewalk at it's expense. The City could abate our property taxes for the 30 year life of the sidewalk. The City could permanently indemnify us for any liability caused by an accident on the sidewalk. The City could amend it's rules to have staff available to maintain, clear, and shovel the sidewalk Bottom line is it is I feel it is the epitome of being unfair that those of us unlucky to be the 4 -5% who get stuck with a sidewalk to have to deal with all of the above for what is supposed to be a neighborhood sidewalk benefiting everyone. Throughout the other 95% continue on unaffected but I am stuck the inconvenience, additional expense, additional hassle, and additional maintenance, liability concerns, and labor requirements. I don't have time to do all of that. All of that for a misplaced sidewalk that connects to nothing, and does not change the walkability or safety concerns that we have now. Thus, this random lonely sidewalk to nowhere covering 4% of the neighborhood remains highly questionable as to whether it accomplishes the pedestrian push going on in the first place. I hope some of you will seriously consider this message. Respectfully, Mark Ettinger 7007 West Shore Drive Edina • Example, maintenance. If I have a sidewalk no one is going to maintain it for me. I am on the corner and spend a lot of time mowing, edging all the way around and sweeping and everything else. With a sidewalk that doubles my weekly work to try to maintain my property. In the spring we get billions of those helicopter seeds from Silver Maple trees. I have to sweep them off the driveway because they stain it and now I would have a double chore with the sidewalk. In the fall we get lots of leaves. Again, its sweeping off the driveway and doubling the work with the sidewalk. • Example, winter. On the corner as we get a ton of snow at the edge. I don't have to tell you last winter I had 5 feet of snow around my two streets. I don't have the time, energy, or equipment to clear all that snow. How can I be expected to do that? You might say I might have to hire it out. Ok, who is going to pay me the additional expense I have never had before? You might say the City will plow it as they do on 7&h. But that is one step forward and one step back. The machine will Inevitably damage some of the lawn. Every spring I will have to call the City and they will have to replace sod all the way down the sidewalk most likely. • Example, liability. I have not researched this one yet. Who has liability of someone falls on my sidewalk because of ice? If the answer is that I do, then how do I deal with that? Do I need additional insurance and who is going to volunteer to pay that bill? • Example, sidewalk replacement. Your engineer says down the road if there is problem with the sidewalk it is my responsibility and expense to fix it. Again, no one else in the neighborhood has that problem. • Example, landscaping. Again, your engineer says they will take care of everything. But no assurances. And he avoids details. We know it never goes that smoothly. I would have to re- think my landscaping that exists and is planned. • Example, City fixtures. I have a hydrant, street light, and street sign on my corner. How do they fit into the plan. If they have to be moved that's another huge hole in the ground and project. No one says. • Example, property taxes. The City engineer says it enhances the value of our property. Does that mean on top of everything else they will use this as a basis to increase assessments so I get to pay more in property taxes for something I never had and never wanted? • Example, we know what you need. This came out of nowhere with no advance notice. Many are still probably unaware of what is going on. Shouldn't this be important enough to be elevated to specific mailings? • Example, surveys. What kind of survey did you do that tells you explicitly that everyone wants sidewalks? Possibly that was a very general survey that says do you like walkability and aren't sidewalks safer than walking in the street. We can all write surveys designed to yield the desired results. What about this a specific targeted survey to every house on West Shore from 66" to Hibiscus. It would be impartial and non - biased. It would describe the true advantages and disadvantages. Every household can read it and vote yes, no, or abstain. That would be a fair, transparent way to resolve this. I will be happy to go with the majority either way whether the answer is yes or no. At least that way everyone will feel the Council listened to the residents and way to redesign the walkways and paths then the sidewalk. Suppose you build the sidewalk and then discover it doesn't work, then what happens? Do you come back and build more sidewalks? Is there ever an end to this? • Taking a hit for the team. What I don't like is that the sidewalk presents many challenges glossed over by your engineer. He says they will take care of everything. That's what a salesman says when he hasn't thought through all the details and is trying to sell you something before you figure it out. It's like building a house. There will be many issues and we all know that. I don't appreciate having to be among the 4% who have to deal with this when over 95% of the neighborhood is not affected. • Example, parking. For years I have parked a 3`a car at the end of our driveway. It is in such a place that we can back other cars from the garage and swivel around it without having to jockey cars back and forth. It is also in a place that would block a potential sidewalk. Do you know there is a state law that you cannot block a sidewalk? All of a sudden I would not be able to have my car or guests park in the driveway because that would block your sidewalk and I could get ticketed. Huge inconvenience to me. Huge problem. • Example, sprinklers. I have our system set to run first thing in the morning. Best time to run it per landscape companies. But would that get in the way of any students or pedestrians walking through my yard at that time? Am I going to get a call from someone who complains about the time I run my sprinkler because their kid is getting wet or has to run through the street? Am I going to be forced to some other schedule? Never a concern before. • Example, re- engineer the sprinklers. I don't want to be watering a potential sidewalk. That would necessitate re- engineering the system. That means new heads, new underground lines. That also means several thousand dollars and digging trenches all through my yard all over again. It would take several years for the lawn to recover. • Example, street project already done. A few years ago you dug up my corner and put in a new fire hydrant. The City did a poor job of fixing the lawn. We let it go because of the impending street and curb project. I will say I was in favor of the new streets and storm sewers. That worked out fine, glad to have it done. But, we lived through 3 seasons of construction, house shaking, dirt everywhere and so forth. At the end I had to have my house power washed, everything outside cleaned, windows, etc. If ever there was a time to do sidewalks it was then. Everything was in place, everyone's yard was already torn up. The City missed it's opportunity. I really don't want to go through this all over again and have everything torn up, curbs, yard, street, and so on. I spent a lot of time and money rebuilding the lawn afterwards. I have big landscaping bills and water bills to prove it. • Example, fiscal issues. I would say it would be reckless and irresponsible to tear up the completed street project and rebuild it again after a few short years. No prudent business or homeowner would ever do anything like that. A prudent business or homeowner would be forward thinking and if something was done once perhaps they would just live with it rather than go to all the unnecessary additional expense. As elected city officials you need to think about these things. November 21, 2014 Edina City Council Re: West Shore Drive sidewalk proposal Let me say from the beginning we are opposed to the sidewalk proposal. I have reviewed the Edina Vision plan, gone to meetings and talked to residents. I know some are opposed, some agree, and some are neutral. I understand the general concept of trying to create more pedestrian and bike friendly paths. In one of the quadrant meetings the City Engineer either didn't know or seemed uninterested in or glossed over many details. I'd like to make some points. • West Shore Drive reclassification. There seems to be some reason why our street was reclassified into a roadway requiring sidewalks. We really don't know how that happened. It seems to be driven more by a plan to force sidewalks than anything else. The street has had the same volume of traffic for years. It can't have any more or less because the fact that the neighborhood can't change size given the borders. • The lonely sidewalk to nowhere. Our street connects to nothing and is a not a passageway to anywhere so I don't know what the City is trying to connect our street to. By the engineers own definition the overriding concern seems to be about students but even he says they would follow the sidewalk path part way and then cut over to the school on side streets. Actually, the students will take the shortest path, sidewalk or no sidewalk from their homes to the school. Does anyone really think that in rain, snow, cold or other bad weather that the students will go out of their way to take a sidewalk when there is a shorter path? • Example, funneling the students to one place. The engineer's theory is that the students will all go up West Shore and cut over on Belvedere. He specifically said that. There are no sidewalks there. That means that all the kids from the entire neighborhood will according to his plan all go down a street together with no sidewalks that is never plowed first thing in the morning. And then to Wooddale, no sidewalks, and then to Andover, no sidewalks. You could argue that putting all the kids in one spot at one time greatly increases the danger of an accident. So we can't say the kids are walking to school on sidewalks. Even the engineer acknowledges that. They still will spend more time on streets than sidewalks. • There are 902 homes in the Cornelia neighborhood. That includes from 62 on the North and the golf course on the south and from 100 on the West to France on the east. A ballpark number of houses who would end up with a sidewalk under this plan is maybe 40 or so. So we are talking about 4 -5% of the neighborhood houses would have a sidewalk. So, if the goal is to make the neighborhood more walkable, pedestrian friendly and so forth I don't see how anyone could say that having sidewalks in 4% of the neighborhood accomplishes that. That is why this lonely sidewalk to nowhere would not be much used, won't change the number of walkers or their route, and won't change safety concerns. There is logically more of a safety concern when pedestrians come off and on limited sidewalks emerging between parked cars and so forth then just being visible on the street ahead for a long distance from a vehicle. There has to be another Heather Branigin From: The Ettingers <mebee7007 @q.com> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:29 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Message for the Edina Council Attachments: November 21, 2014 to Edina.docx Can the attached please be forwarded to each member of the City Council. i i r The way our neighborhood was laid out, the single - family streets shown in green do not go through to the multi- family units on streets shown in red To put a multi - family project at the corner of 72nd Street, as they say on Sesame Street, "doesn't belong." In fact, if a design student drew this plan with a multi- family development at 72nd, they would probably get marked down and the professor would think that the student hadn't yet gotten the concept of the purpose of zoning. If it were to actually be built, you would essentially be saying to residents of this project, we are putting you in this neighborhood but we really don't want you to access your house through the neighborhood and we are actually physically building it, and the sheet, so that you don't when you go out of it What? lust because this property is the first one to become available for re- development on the west side of France between 72nd and 76th is not a good reason for a project of this kind (multi- family) to go in there. A good deal on a bad thing is a bad deal. Sincerely, Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. 952 -935 -9755 not to mention all of the existing businesses up and down France Avenue alone including all of Southdale? Or, is Edina giving tax breaks to businesses and sticking it to the residents instead? And, about the bike trail that is going to be constructed directly behind my property, did Edina actually cave in to Three Rivers Park District and throw in the 5 million they wanted? Did you decide to tax my property in particular because it does directly border the trail and you felt that justified the increase somehow? I don't know — it just sounds like there is no method to your madness in sucking up funds with vacuum force on targeted sources. Oh, and I mustn't forget to bring up the subject of forcing Edina residents to foot their own bill entirely for neighborhood improvement projects. I've never before heard of such a thing in Mpls /St Paul. Really? With the massive sums you're bringing in you can't even partially subsidize those projects — unbelievable. So, I'm really wondering who in the world would want to move to Edina given all of the above. It's getting to be a real rip-off community and the truth needs to be exposed. To sum it all up, a 35% increase in my property taxes is criminal. Period. It is large scale theft of taxpayer money and is unjustified and immoral. I demand that my property taxes be lowered or I will seek out whatever methods are available to register my disgust with the way this city is managed. I will name names of City Council members, Mayor, etc., and will ostracize and condemn them publicly for their irresponsible handling and use of taxpayer funds. I am practiced at this having been victimized by scams in the past. Please respond as soon as possible. Time is money. I will be compiling my list of outlets to tell my story to in the meantime. Regards, Bette II , would be smarter to go to Lake Minnetonka, Orono, etc., where they would actually have a gorgeous house to warrant the monstrous property taxes!!! My home was built in 1984 and I purchased it in 1993. It is located on Poppy Lane in a "lesser' neighborhood of Edina. My backyard is directly adjacent to the on -ramp to Hwy 100 northbound with constant traffic noise, gas fumes, and cars speeding by. This is the first thing realtors and others mention upon entering my home and always comment that this would drive down the worth of my home. I have done only minor repairs to my home for maintenance purposes with no major improvements or remodeling whatsoever. The interior needs paint, new window treatments, the bathrooms and kitchen are all very outdated, and the basement needs new flooring. So, just what do you think potential buyers are going to say when they walk through my home and learn that the house comes with a bizarre property tax bill of $5,810.36? Do you SERIOUSLY think they will consider purchasing it ?!1! Unless they are totally out of their minds, they would move on very quickly. So, essentially Edina is now messing with the ability for me, and others, to sell my home for a reasonable price. In order to interest a buyer it would most likely be necessary to lower the sale price of the home accordingly to attract buyers because the yearly tax bill is so ungodly high. Delving into this matter a bit further, I would like to ask who was responsible for the decision to suddenly increase the values so much higher on certain properties and not increase taxes at all on others. lust what was the criteria used? This recent tax hike WAS NOT an across the board increase as was relayed to me by a woman at the Edina Assessors Office. I have received feedback from other Edina residents, some who indicated their taxes went up only $5, some whose property taxes did not go up at all, and at least one other resident whose home value was raised by $100,000 as mine was. It seems like a very arbitrary and unfair method was applied. Also, I would like a budget for 2015 broken down into categories to determine just exactly how our money is being spent. I've noticed a lot of "improvements" such as roundabouts (irritating) and bike lanes (rve only seen one biker use the bike lane on W. 70th Street). There has been new development such as apartments and condos and another large project proposed at France and 72nd Street. So, tell me, shouldn't all of this new construction be contributing massive sums to Edina's coffers to provide some relief to residents, Bette Anderson 4936 Poppy Lane Edina, MN 55435 952-486,8834 betteanderson @vahoo.com November 24, 2014 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424 Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed 2015 Property Tax Increase PLEASE DISTRIBUTE COPIES TO ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS Dear Sir /Madam: This letter is written to aggressively protest the proposed taxes on my property for 2015. The amount of increase (35%) is absolutely ludicrous and immoral. I DEMAND a decrease or I will take this story to the Star Tribune and whatever other news sources are available. Edina is out of control in their greed to accumulate money without accountability. I have lived in Edina for 37 years. This used to be a very reasonable, well - managed community that made good use of their resources while maintaining very affordable tax rates. This is no longer the case. I and many others with whom I have had contact have absolutely had enough. My home value was reassessed upwards of $100,000. Plus I will have to incur the added expense of the road improvement project in front of my home which I could not pay outright ($7,000) so it will be added to my property taxes as well ($619 /yr). My property tax bill is estimated to rise from $3,894.798 to $5,191.36, PLUS the extra $619 for the road project, for a whopping total of $5,810.36 per year11111111111 M I I live in the Lake Edina /Cornelia neighborhood, not Indian Hills. An increase such as this will do nothing but drive residents to sell (many in my neighborhood have already baled) and also will discourage potential buyers from purchasing in Edina. If people really don't mind paying that much in property taxes they Heather Branigin From: gwoessner777 @hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, November 23, 201411:28 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Garry Woessner Organization: Website: Address 1: 6602 Scandia Road Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55439 Email: gwoessner777@hotmail.com Phone: 952- 944 -5415 Referrer: email_or other correspondence_from city Message: Just wanted to weigh in on the sidewalks plan. I fully support the plan for walkable streets and access to public schools. The path on the fields below the high school should also be considered as it has deteriorated into an unpassable condition. My only concern with the plan would be if residents are charged a special assessment for them, especially if part of street reconstruction assessments. Heather Branigin From: publishersr @hotmail.com on behalf of Judy B <judith @brennereditorial.com> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 201410:10 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: klosellenOS @gmail.com; Neil B; Ann Hustad Subject: Letter to halt projects closer to the creek Nov. 22, 2014 Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commission, This letter is regarding the neighboring property at 5024 Bruce Place and requested variance. Together, homes across from this neighboring property oppose this proposed setback variance near the Minnehaha Creek. We regret missing the Oct. 22 public hearing as this was during the MEA school break and several of us were out of town. That is why we are petitioning together at this date. It is concerning that this construction project proposed directly across the creek from our yards will likely worsen the creek's path should it flood over its banks again after heavy rains. Consider the slopes and low lying areas across the way. We recommend adherence to current setbacks as they stand today as the most appropriate action for this project. Please do not allow this project to move forward as planned. Sincerely, Ellen & Steve Klos 5019 Wooddale Lane Judy & Neil Brenner 5021 Wooddale Lane Heather Branigin From: GVUIGNES @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering BA-412 To Whom..... We are owner's of a condo unit in the Lanterns. 4075 W 51 st.St. Received the letter re: the road and sewer improvements. We have recently gone through this process on our home at 5040 West 56th St. As there are several condominium projects in the area, my question is how are these properties assessed for this proposed work? I know that in our neighborhood of detached single family homes, the project was divided equally by the number of houses affected. This approach was considered fair as everyone had their own driveways, lot frontage is fairly consistent, and all have private garbage collection service. Our condo building has 44 units. Four curb cuts (2 for the driveways and 2 for the parking lot), and a single garbage collection service. I will look forward to your answers and thank you for taking the time to respond to this note. Gary Wignes 952 - 926 - 8928 612 - 327 - 7876 - cell Heather Branigin From: publishersr @hotmail.com on behalf of Judy B <judith @brennereditorial.com> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 201411:25 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Variance request input - Bruce Judith Brenner 5021 Wooddale Lane Edina, MN 55424 Tel: 952 -405 -9079 To: Edina Planning Commission Edina City Council Members Dear Edina Planning Commission and Council Members, This letter is regarding the neighboring property and the Recommended Action to Approve the 20.25 foot setback variance from Minnehaha Creek -- for a basement addition below an existing main floor deck and a 5 foot side yard setback variance to increase ceiling height in an existing room above the attached garage — at 5024 Bruce Place. am concerned about surface runoff and impervious ground cover. When there is more concrete underground for a basement, does that impact the underground water table and displace water around a sensitive zone in neighboring yards across the creek? Is there some assurance from the Planning Commission and Watershed District that this construction project proposed directly across the creek from our yard will not worsen the creek's path should it flood over its banks again after heavy rains? We have two gardens already impacted by current conditions when there are dangerous creek levels. I have a 3rd water - sensitive garden and of course structure we aim to protect knowing the creek overflows at times. Adhering to Setbacks can mitigate any increased potential for flood damage. A larger footprint of home anywhere near the creek is concerning. I hope for some assurance on impact, before project is approved and /or moves forward. Sincerely, Judith Brenner system, a creative and diverse social environment, open and green spaces, and walk- able, bike -able, interactive, livable community. As a child of the 1970's Twin Cities suburbia, early on in my adult life I realized the disconnect in the sprawling car -based suburban model in which I grew up. In older suburbs, such as Edina, you now have a unique opportunity to re- envision your city and provide for the ingrowth seen as an economic boon in our more vital cities today. On a recent return visit to the Twin Cities, it was affirming to rediscover that type and sense of community, both traditional and emergent, being held as a model for development in my former home. What I, and we, found in several locales, including Edina, was simply exciting and, again, affirmed our desire to return and make a home. As noted in the recent Star - Tribune article, you will certainly meet with some opposition from those who may hold firm to what may be something of an obsolete model of classic suburbia. I encourage you, though, to,keep the faith and actively pursue your vision of and for your community into a dynamic, promising future. You are, in short, onto something Good. Please pass it on to all involved in your efforts. With Hope— Peter PLerav-w cc: City Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson Peter Pierson 1967 Shadow Valley Drive Prescott, AZ 86305 928 - 277 -8122 (H) p.pierson99706 @gmail.com Mayor Jim Hovland 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 mail @EdinaMN.gov I just read, from too far a distance, the recent Star - Tribune feature on expanding your sidewalk system as part of your vision for a vibrant and sustainable, not to mention sustaining, community. I give Mayor Jim Hovland and the progressive (as in forward looking) members of your City Council credit for putting Edina on the top of my list of communities to consider in a move back to Minnesota. What I see in your vision is a breath of fresh air from the narrow path of Build -It- and- They -Will -Come mentality that seems to define, and to plague, communities across what some might see as the illustrious Southwest, including the one in which I am making a temporary home as I wrap up a belated MA Fellowship and build on a professional base in freelance writing and communications. I've been gone from Minnesota too long, and what I see in your vision of Livable Community affirms my desire to come back and find, and make, Home. In the years I've been away, I've had the opportunity to realize and value the quality of place in creative, walk -able, bike -able, distinct, local community; the very same quality of place many contemporary economists and planners assert as being the primary draw for young creative professionals and the jobs they fill. Your vision in creating and maintaining these elements of your physical and social community are, in my opinion, going to bring rewards beyond your imagination in the years, and generations, ahead. It has, again, certainly brought my, and our, attention to your city as my partner and I explore opportunities for a return move. Our vision is shared and supported by a growing number of economists and urban planners. As urban theorist Richard Florida notes in his pivotal The Rise of the Creative Class, ...a simpler... path to revival (is) to improve neighborhood conditions with smaller investments in everything from parks to bike paths to street -level culture that would make everyday lives better, improve the underlying quality of place, and signal a community that is open, energized, and diverse. It is not so much, argues Florida and many others, in economically depleting tax breaks for relocating national chains and corporate offices that attract sustaining employment and the professionals that fill those jobs, but in a quality educational Heather Branigin From: Peter Pierson <p.pierson99706 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 8 :02 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Support and Praise for Your Efforts ... and Vision... Livable Streets, and Livable Community Attachments: Edina_LivingStreets_Letter Nov2014.docx Mayor Jim Hovland, City Council Members- Please accept the attached letter of support. I just read the recent feature in the Star - Tribune about the pitfalls you are experiencing with your Livable Streets program. As a former suburban Twin Cities resident with my eyes on a move back, and as a communications professional with a background and dedication to the idea of Livable Community, your efforts have certainly caught my attention. What I saw in a recent trip back was affirmed in the article and my subsequent look through the online information on your vision for Edina, and I would like to simply pass on my support and praise for your efforts. Fetes pterso-w Prescott, AZ 928 - 277 -8122 970 - 366 -7262 (Mobile) Sentiment without action is the ruin of the soul. (Edward Abbey) To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 2, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. iNA, Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 id 1365 South Grade Road SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 November 20, 2014 To Edina City Hall, Hello, I am a 6th grade student at Hutchinson Middle School in Hutchinson, MN. Our social studies class is doing a project where we select two cities in Minnesota and write a letter to those communities to describe the history of Hutchinson. We hope to receive information or materials back to share with our Class about the importance of your community. First, let me start by describing myself and interests. I was born at Forgo and lived at Hutchinson for about two years. I like track and swimming. My family live in the country. I have 21 cats and 1 dog. It is gust me and my mom. My mom and I like to send time with my mom. Now 'I would like to tell you about the town of Hutchinson. The town was founded and started by the three Hutchinson brothers. The town was attacked by the Sioux Indians duringthe Sioux Uprising. Chief Little Crow was a leader of the Indians. He was later shot just North of ;Hutchinson. Hutchinson has the second, oldest park system in the United States. Only Central .Park in New York City is older. There are a lot of lakes in the area. The Crow River also flows through town. More and more businesses are moving and building in Hutchinson. 3M is a major manufacturer and a company in town. Thank you for reading my letter about the history of Hutchinson. I would appreciate it if you could sent a letter, information,.or any materials back so that I could inform my class about your town: Sincerely, ('�ko� I Jaden 1365 South Grade Road SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 November 20, 2014 Hello, Hello, I am Ty a 6th grade student at Hutchinson Middle School in Hutchinson, MN. Our social studies class is doing a project where we select two cities in Minnesota and write a letter to those communities to describe the history of Hutchinson. We hope to receive information or materials back to share with our class about the importance of your community. First, let me start by:describing myself and interests. I was born and :raised in Hutchinson. I like playing football, baseball, lacrosse, and my favorite sport of all is hockey. I have two older brothers. My family and I live in the country and have a big pond and we'skate all the time. I go snowmobiling and hunting out at my house. Now I would like to tell you about the town of Hutchinson. The town was founded and started by the three Hutchinson brothers. The town was attacked by the Sioux Uprising. Chief Little Crow was a leader of the Indians. He was later shot just north of Hutchinson. Hutchinson has the second oldest park system in the United States. Only Central Park in New York City is- older. There are a lot of lakes in the area. The Crow River also flows through town. -More and more businesses are moving and building in Hutchinson. 3M is a major manufacturer and company in town. Thank you for reading my letter about the history of Hutchinson. 'I would appreciate it if you could send a letter, information, or any materials back so that I could inform my class about your town. Sincerely, 4 .Ty Attention Luke Wollan 1365 South Grade Road SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 November 19, 2014 To Whom It May Concern, Hello, I am a 6th grade student at Hutchinson Middle School in Hutchinson, MN. Our social studies class is doing a project where we select two cities in Minnesota and write a letter to those communities to describe the history of Hutchinson. We hope to receive information or materials back to share with our class about the importance of your community. First, let me start by describing myself and interests. I was born in.Hutchinson and still live there. Some sports I play are: Football; Basketball and Baseball. We live in the town of Hutch. I like playing Frisbee golf too. I also love playing video games. I have three siblings. Now I would like to tell you about the town of Hutchinson. The town was founded and started by the three Hutchinson brothers. The town was attacked by the Sioux Indians during the Sioux Uprising. Chief Little Crow was a leader of the Indians. He was later shot just North of Hutchinson. Hutchinson has the second oldest park system in the United States. Only Central Park in New York City is older. There are a lot of lakes in the area. The Crow River also flows through town. More and more businesses are moving and building in Hutchinson. 3M is a major manufacturer and company in town. Thank you for reading my letter about the history of Hutchinson. I would appreciate it if you could send a letter, information, or any materials back so that I could inform my class about your town. Sincerely, Luke Wollan Attn: Alyssa Johnson 1365 South Grade Rd. Hutchinson, MN 55350 November 20, 2014 To Whom It May Concern, Hello, I am a 6t" grade student at Hutchinson Middle School in Hutchinson, MN. Our social studies class is doing a project where we select two cities in Minnesota and write a letter to those communities to describe the history of Hutchinson. We hope.to receive'information or materials back to share with our class about the importance of your community. First, let me start by describing myself and interests. I was born and have lived in Hutchinson my entire life. I like to dance, play the piano, and play the clarinet. I one younger brother and one younger sister. My family and I live in Hutchinson. I enjoy doing hair on my sister and watching Cute Girls Hairstyles videos. Now I would like to tell you about the town of Hutchinson. The town was founded and started by the three Hutchinson brothers. The town was attacked by the Sioux Indians during the Sioux Uprising. Chief Little Crow was a leader of the Indians. He was later shot just North of Hutchinson. Hutchinson has the second oldest park system in the. United States. Only Central Park in New York City is older. There are a lot of lakes in the area. The Crow River also flows through town. More and more.businesses are moving and building in Hutchinson. 3M is a major manufacturer a,nd company in town. Thank you for reading my letter about the history of Hutchinson. I would appreciate it if you could, send,a letter, information, or any materials back so that I could inform my class about your town. Sincerely, Alyssa Johnson With many thanks from... o Edina �! Give and %jo.org Small needs. Big impact on our youth. Centermint® EneW November 21, 2014 800 LaSalle Avenue P.O. Box 59038 Minneapolis, MN 55459 -0038 In August 2013, Center Point Energy filed a request with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) to change its rates for utility distribution service. Earlier this year, the MPUC approved an annual revenue increase of approximately $32.9 million or 3.9 percent, which goes into effect Dec. 1, 2014. Under the final order, the monthly Basic Charge for residential customers will increase $1.50 per month from $8.00 to $9.50, and the per - therm Delivery Charge increases from $0.16637 to $0.18458. The rate changes will affect individual monthly bills differently depending on the amount of natural gas used and the customer's rate class. The effect on an average residential customer's bill (who uses approximately 900 therms in a year) will be an increase of about $2.85 per month, or $34 per year. Bills will also vary because the wholesale cost of natural gas changes each month. State law allowed CenterPoint Energy to collect interim (temporary) rates while the MPUC considered the rate increase request. Since the final rate increase is less than the interim rate increase, CenterPoint Energy will refund the difference, with interest, beginning in December 2014. A typical residential customer's refund will be about $11. The Commission's approval also included a new revenue decoupling pilot program, which will begin in July of 2015. Revenue decoupling is a rate mechanism that separates the link between the amount of revenue CenterPoint Energy earns and the amount of natural gas used by customers. Revenue decoupling allows CenterPoint Energy to adjust rates up or down each year to make up for any shortfall or excess in revenue that is not related to the cost of gas. More information about the revenue decoupling pilot program will be available online and in print soon. The best way for customers to manage their natural gas bill is to lower usage. CenterPoint Energy has a nation - leading program to help customers increase the energy efficiency of their homes and businesses. We offer low -cost home energy audits to help identify ways customers can reduce energy costs and increase their comfort. We also have numerous rebate offerings for high - efficiency natural gas equipment that help lower operating costs. We maintain a website for energy saving ideas with many low -cost and no -cost ideas and information, including a tool to compare this year to last year for temperature and consumption. You can learn more about these and the many other ways we are helping our customers reduce their usage and their gas bills by visiting CenterPointEnergy .com /SaveEnergy. Enclosed is a copy of the bill insert that will be included in customer bills starting in December 2014 when final rates are implemented. The insert provides more detailed information explaining how the new rates will affect monthly bills and encourage energy conservation. If you have questions,, comments or would like more information, you are invited to visit our website at CenterPointEnergy.com /RateCase. Sincerely, Joe Vortherms Division Vice President - Regional Gas Operations Enclosure: Final Rates Bill Insert HOW TO LEARN MORE To learn more visit our website at CenterPointEnergy.com/RateCase and take advantage of our online calculator to learn about how reducing your natural gas consumption can lower your monthly bill. Residential 612 - 372 -4727 • 800 - 245 -2377 Business Call your account manager or the Business Customer Hotline 612 - 321 -4939 • 877 - 809 -3803 02014Centei'Poml'Energy 141SM �CenterPoint� Ener9y ?cam_✓`.... �stti...:_i�.'"y+= s..._, NEW NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION RATES APPROVED IN 2014 Charges begin with the enclosed bill In August 2013, CenterPoint Energy filed a request with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) to change its rates for utility distribution service. The filing, known as a rate case, sought to increase the company's annual revenues by $44.3 million or 5 percent. MPUC approves new rates The MPUC approved an annual revenue increase of approximately $32.9 million, or 3.9 percent Under the final order, the monthly Basic Charge for residential customers increases from $8110 to $9.50, and the per therm Delivery Charge increases from $0.16637 to $0.18458. The new rates approved by the MPUC also include an important change —see inside for information about the new revenue decoupling pilot program that will start next year. RATES VARY BY CUSTOMER CLASS Rate changes will affect individual monthly bills differently depending on the amount i of natural gas used and the customers rate class. The effect on an average residential customers bill (who uses approximately 900 therms in a year) will be an increase of about $2.85 per month, or'$34 per year. Bills will also vary because the wholesale cost of natural gas changes each month. Customers' bills contain three parts: Basic Charge, Delivery Charge and Cost of Gas, which is passed through directly to customers without mark -up. The Basic Charge and Delivery Charge recover only the cost of providing utility distribution service to our customers. They do not include wholesale gas costs -which makeup about 60-70 percent of the bill. . Monthly Basic Charge: Current New Residential $8.00 $9.50 C /1 -A $12.00 $15.00 C/I -B $18.00' $21.00 CA-C $43.00 $43.00 SVDF -A $60.00 $50.00 SVDF -B $90.00 $80.00 LVDF $600.00 $800.00 Delivery Charge (per therm): Current New Residedal $0.16637 $0.18456 CA -A $0.14680 $0.14129 CA-B $0.14422 $013349 GA-C $0.13362 $0.13969 SVDF -A $0.09941. $0.11409 SVDF -B $0.09420 $0.10697 LVDF $0.04270 $0.05034 Note: The current and new per therm delivery charges do not include the per therm charge for the Conservation Improvement Program Adjustment Rider that is used to recover conservation costs not included in base rates. Refunds on interim rates. State law allowed CenterPoint Energy to _ collect interim (temporary) rates while the MPUC considered its rate case. The company began collecting 1 annual interim rates of $42.9 million, on October 1, 2013. Since the final rate increase is less than the interim rate increase, the company will refund the difference, with interest, beginning in December 2014 bills: A typical residential customer's refund will be about $11. New revenue decoupling pilot program starts July 2015 The purpose of revenue decoupling is to reduce CenterPoint Energy's. disincentive to promote energy conservation and energy efficiency. Revenue decoupling separates the link between the amount of revenue CenterPoint Energy collects from its customers and changes in the amount of natural gas they use. Revenue decoupling allows CeoterPoint Energy to automatically adjust its rates for residential, commercial and industrial customers once each year. CenterPoint Energy will adjust its rates up or down each year to make up for any short fall or excess in non -gas sales revenue. This pilot prggram will start with July 2015 usage. The first decoupling rate adjustment will appear on customer bills in fall 2016. We will provide more information on the decoupling pilot program in the future. Customertype Avg monthly Avg monthly bill Avg monthly bill (usage in therms) usage in therms current rates new rates Residential - Small 37 $32.00 $34.19 Medium 73 $55.35 $58.20 Large 110 $79.35 $82.89 CommercialAndustrial Up to 1,500/year 60 $50.00 $53.r- 1,500 to 5,000/year 226 $160.00 $161 5,000 or more/year 1,137 $741.00 $74B.o°. Small Volume Dual Fuel Sales Service Up to 120,000/pear 3,800 $1,995.00 $2,041.00 120,600 or more/year 13,745 $7,017.00 $7,182.00 Large Volume Dual Fuel Sales Service 70,000 $30,752.00 $31,487.00 - - - -- Original Message - - - -- - From: Chris Rofidal [mailto:crofidal @ comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 4:12 PM Subject: Opposition to 7200 France Please forward to Edina City Council.... Thank you! Dear Edina City Council- Just a brief note in opposition of the 7200 France project as is currently being proposed. Clearly the Comprehensive Plan is being viola ted which is the main issue. That said, my issue is regarding the process of this application as it now sits with you. Please consider that both the City Planners and the Planning Commission are NOT recommending this application. How many times have we heard people complaining when they feel City Staff is ramming something through? How many times do you hear complaints that the Planning Commission did not listen to the residents at the pubic hearing? Well, guess what ... not this time. This time both your planning professionals and appointed Commission have said TO DENSE for the West side of France. Please.do the right thing by asking the developers to go back to the drawing board on this one. I grew up within a 9 iron of that site and the area is maxed out. As an aside, please ask tough questions about drainage and water runoff. I can tell you first hand that after a series of hard rainfalls, I have swam in that parking lot as a kid. Not the smartest thing I have ever done :) Good Iuck and thank you for your, service to our Community. Thanks also to the City Staff who have done their due diligence on this one... Chris Chris Rofidal 612 963 2887 cell 952 285 4459 work crofidal @comcast.net http: / /www.linkedin.com /in /crofidal From: Jane Melroe rmailto:jmbrumeMgmail.coml Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:42 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Rezoning request for 7200 France Avenue Note to you, the Mayor and all members of the City Council: I strongly oppose the rezoning request by the developers of the 7200 France Avenue site., The developers revised proposal is still in excess of the City's Comprehensive Plans in terms of height, living density and floor area ratio. I am especially concerned about the traffic problems that any building in this area will create for the residents in the Cornelia neighborhood. 1. I would like to see the Council follow Staff and Planning Commission recommendations that the developer's revised proposal be denied. The existing Comprehensive Plan with its 4 story height limit, FAR requirements and prohibition of retail on the parcel is and will continue to be valid. Do the right thing and support the residents in voicing their opinion that on this'particular site the redevelopment requirements are set. Jane Melroe 952- 926 -9736 Heather Branigin from: Patrick Wrase Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:28 PM To: 'ryandgordon @hotmail.com' Cc: Edina Mail; Chad Millner Subject: RE: Attn: City Council and Engineering Hello Mr. Gordon, Thanks for the questions and concerns regarding the upcoming Countryside H Neighborhood Reconstruction project. You are correct that we presented a range of $8,600 to. $10,900 at the July 28, 2014 informational meeting. Since that July meeting, we have met with contractors, had discussions with others and have reviewed the economic outlook for construction costs. All the data is showing a greater increase in prices than we had anticipated in July. All signs are showing greater volatility in the prices. Knowing this information, we wanted to notify both the residents and council of our concerns as soon as possible and the first opportunity was the PIH. Using the information we have today, we added additional contingency to the estimated project costs and assessments. We are going to do two things to allow us the opportunity to reduce those assessments. 1. Bid the project in Feb /early March before other communities to get the best prices available 2. Continue to look for efficiencies during construction to save project costs While we would have liked to be able to hold the range discussed in July, we felt it was better to get that information jut to everyone now versus surprising the residents and council during the final assessment hearing. 1 understand the $900 difference is not a small number but I hope you understand our thinking that now is the time to have.this discussion. Thanks for being engaged in your project, please contact me at your convenience if you have any additional questions. Pat ��'�'�e,,: Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer v a 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 v4 PWraseO- EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov �• ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Begin forwarded message: From: Edina Mail <mailQEdinaMN.gov> Date: November 25, 2014 at 1:21:50 PM CST To: Chad Millner <cmillner@Edina.MN.gov> Subject: FW: Attn: City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, This message, has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Chad Millner. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist i 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cD-EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ryan Gordon fmailtoarandQordonftotmail.coml Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering Dear City of Edina Engineering Representative, I'm a resident in Edina's Countryside H neighborhood and received,the Notice of Public Hearing for our neighborhood's roadway reconstruction project, proposal and hearing. I will not be able to make the public hearing at the City Council meeting on 12/9. But l_do have a question that was not addressed (or if it was, was not easily visible) in the November 2014 Engineering Study report. Theproposed project cost communicated earlier this year was estimated to be between $8,600 - 10,900 per REU. Yet, in the most recent communication, the proposed project cost, funded through special assessment, is $11,732/REU. This proposed cost is also at the upper end of the Public Hearing Assessment costs for past completed roadway reconstruction projects. ;I would like to know what factors contributed to this higher:..proposed project cost compared to the earlier estimate and the cost from other neighborhood's in' Edina that went through roadway reconstruction. Thank you, Ryan Gordon Ryan Gordon Mobile: 952 - 923 -7182 Email: ryandgordonPhotmaii.com 2 Heather Branigin From: David /Karen. Carlson <dcarl @iphouse.com> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 6:01 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Letter for Mayor and Council Members Attachments: 7200 France Avenue letter.doc Hello: Please distribute the letter in the enclosed attachment to Mayor Hovland and the other members of the City Council at the earliest possible time. Please notify us if for some reason you are unable to open the attachment. Thank you very much. David J. Carlson 4713 Aspasia Circle Edina, MN 55435 952 - 926 -3385 I 4713 Aspasia Circle Edina, MN 55435 November 27, 2014 To Mayor Hovland, and Edina City Council Members: As residents of the Lake Edina neighborhood for more than 40 years, we are writing to express our concern over the proposed 7200 France Avenue development. We note that the Planning Commission voted unanimously against this proposal. Our own specific objections are as follows: 1) The proposal_ does not fall within the guidelines of the Edina Comprehensive Plan; both in terms of building height and density. It is a massive amount of construction on a relatively compact building site. A six story building with as many apartments as are proposed will drastically change the character of the adjacent neighborhood of principally single - family homes. We believe it will be detrimental to the neighborhood. 2) The size and scope of this project, includin commercial enterprises along with apartments, with primary access from W. 72" Street will cause major traffic congestion and. back -up on a residential street which is commonly used by Lake Edina neighborhood residents as a convenient route to the businesses on France Avenue. In addition, increased traffic along 72 "d Street and Claremore Drive seems likely to result in safety concerns for children on the south side of Cornelia School. We find the proposed 7200 France Avenue project to represent a very piecemeal approach to redevelopment along the west side of France Avenue. It would seem prudent for the City Council to take a step back, and from the 25,000 foot level consider its vision for the west side of France Avenue between W. 72 "d Street and 1 -494 in broad terms. If nothing else, the council could consider that portion which abuts a single- family neighborhood. For example, a potential redevelopment of the entire parcel on the west side of France between 72 "d Street and Gallagher Drive, with building height and density in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, might be explored. (It is our opinion that the current 7250 France building is also a likely prospect for future redevelopment.) Such a redevelopment would allow access from both 72 "d Street and Gallagher Drive, and be amenable to a design for improved, safer flow of traffic through the neighborhood (perhaps a one -way entrance and exit to off -street parking areas). In summary, we believe the 7200 France proposal is fatally flawed due to its non- compliance with the Edina Comprehensive plan, and also due to its piecemeal nature, which will seriously impede traffic flow on a key neighborhood street. If allowed to proceed, it will have detrimental effects on,Edina neighborhoods south of W. 70th Street and east of Highway 100, and consequently, on the city of Edina. Whatever redevelopment ultimately occurs on this site must be within the confines of the Comprehensive Plan. Please vote "no" on the 7200 proposal! Thank you for the work you do for our city. Sincerely, David and Karen Carlson Heather Branigin From: Rozanne Andersen <Rozanne .Andersen @OntarioSystems.com> Sent: Friday, November 28, 20141:20 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker ;Edina Mail; joseph.palmersheim @ecm- inc ,com; lisa.kaczke@ecm- inc.com; mark.weber @ecm- inc.com Cc: beetlebug00 @gmail.com; halfjan22 @gmail.com; cathylc @mac.com; Collin Nelson; keinelson09 @gmail.com; smarldersen20ll @gmail.com Subject: RE: PLEASE SHARE WITH COUNCIL - VOTE NO RE: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 7200 FRANCE AVE Members of the Edina City Council, My husband and I.have lived in our home on Bristol Circle [cul -de -sac adjacent to proposed development] for almost 21 years. We raised our family in this home and were thrilled when in March of 2014 our daughter and son in, law bought their family home on Hibiscus [just blocks from the proposed development] so they too would and could enjoy raising their children, Livy age three and Jack 18 months, in this quiet, close knit, Cornelia neighborhood. We vehemently oppose your approval of the proposed development of 72, 00 France Ave as presented by Boisclair for four reasons. 1. STOP USE OF 72nd AS A CUT THROUGH /TRAFFIC SAFETY- I recognize my concerns about the proposed development and your apparent proclivity to disregard the Comprehensive Plan are in large part driven by my concern for my family's and.my friends' health, safety and Well- being; but I want you to know I am equally concerned about the safety of the children who attend Cornelia Elementary. I know first -hand how people use Cornelia Drive [South of 70th] as a speedy cut through to France Avenue as they make their way during morning and evening rush hour to and from 494. The use of Cornelia Drive and West Shore Drive for this purpose along with the traffic congestion caused by the Cremation Society when services are in progress makes TRAFFIC SAFETY one of the first reasons you should site for rejecting the development as presented. by Boisclair. 2. STOP THE INCREASED STRESS ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE - Increasing the density of the housing beyond what is permitted in the Comprehensive Plan is simply irresponsible and short sighted. Unless and until the Comprehensive Plan is modified to include a fully articulated plan for the development of France Avenue from its northern most border in Edina to its southern most border at Highway 494 and a Traffic Study and Environmental Impact Study are completed, the city council should refuse to approve any land use proposal that deviates from the Comprehensive Plan — period. Any action contrary to such an approach is irresponsible, extremely short sighted and precisely the reason cities such as Brainerd and St. Cloud Minnesota are visually and practically offensive. 3. REMEMBER WHY WE HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION — It is my understanding our City Manager and perhaps more importantly our Planning Commission have unanimously voted against the development as presented by Boisclair. Does their collective opinion only matter when it is convenient or politically beneficial to the City Council? 4. CLARIFY YOUR VISION /CHAMPS - ELYSEES OR AD HOC DEVELOPMENT? — Quite frankly I travel a lot for my job. I see how cities across the U.S. have grown to embrace socioeconomic, cultural and business needs in ways that actually beautify a locale. But these successes do not happen by way of ad hoc development. They happen because the city planners and councils have a vision that will address today's urban needs and the needs of the people for many years, if not generations, to come. Should France Avenue become our Champs Elysees or a thoroughfare through a quaint, quite residential village? I don't know, but as myelected officials, I think you should. Vote no with regard to the proposed Boisclair development and yes to the creation of a long range plan that incorporates all the comments and information, ou are holding and the surveys you have sent to the you are gleaning from those "ask the residents" meetings y residents. You know the expression, "don't be surprised if you don't get to where you want to be if you don't have a plan." PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS! Sincerely, Rozanne and Steve Andersen 7204 Bristol Circle Edina, MN Rozanne M. Andersen. Esq. Ontario Systems I Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer t 952.221.6267 1 f 765 -751 -7498 1150 West Kilgore WE O N TA K10 Avenue I Muncie, IN 47305 -1588 www.OntarioSystems.com 1 800.283.3227 Disclaimer: This information contained in this email and any attachments or links associated with this email is not intended as legal advice and may not be used as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort has been made to assure this information is up -to -date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel. The'author(s) and Ontario Systems assume no liability for typographical or other errors contained in the email or any attachments or links associated with this email or for changes in the law affecting anything discussed herein. Attention: This message and all attachments are private and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message immediately. Heather Branigin From: Sent• To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Lynette- Steve Brown <steve.brown @cushwakenm.com> Monday, December 01, 201412:31 PM Lynette Biunno Cary Teague; Scott H. Neal FW: 7200 France - planning commission meeting and neighborhood meeting Stephen H.docx Please forward my letter and email to all City Council Members. Thank you, Steve TO: Edina City Council FROM: Steve Brown — 7205 Bristol Circle RE: 7200 France Attached please find a letter that I wrote prior to the Planning Commission meeting regarding the proposed residential project by Boisclair. In addition to the points stated in the letter, I want to add the following comments that I hope you will take into account as you evaluate your options related to this site: • Mixed Use vs. Medical Office: The critical issue that must be contemplated for the City of Edina is what is a more appropriate use for this site, mixed use or medical office? These two uses will have dramatically different impacts on the Cornelia neighborhood. • Mixed Use will "incorporate" the residents living there as part of the neighborhood (I reference this in my letter). The people will become part of any issues that may arise because this is their home, too. • A 67,000 SF medical office building, which is allowed by current zoning, will have a significantly higher traffic count than the mixed use project that is proposed. • In addition, the people that will frequent this site as a medical office building (staff, patients, vendors, visitors) will have no "personal interest" in the neighborhood. They will seek the quickest way to short cut to their destination, and 72nd to Cornelia Drive in front of the school, and 72nd to Wooddale will be the most favored routes. So for neighbors who think that the mixed use will be worse, they do not understand traffic volume associated with a medical office building. • West 70th Street SAC: I As you may recall, I was the Chair for the West 70th Street SAC. One of the primary and fundamental concerns, expressed almost universally in our discussions, was reducing the amount of cut through traffic on 72nd Street and in front of Cornelia Elementary. o The mixed use project will be far less invasive than the medical office building would be from a traffic perspective. • Sunrise Site (the site directly to the north of the 7200 site): o Related to the above points, I ask you to recall the discussions that occurred on the site currently occupied by Sunrise Assisted Living. There was a proposal for an office building that required a rezoning, which was summarily dismissed because of the traffic generation, and lack of some type of "step down" use adjacent to the neighborhood. That was a general office building, which does not generate the traffic counts associated with a medical office building. The Sunrise facility was an incredible find that met that step down aspect exceptionally well. o My understanding is that a 67,000 Sf medical office building is allowed by current city code. This is not an insignificant sized medical office building. In fact, this is the exact type of use that was summarily dismissed on the Sunrise site. I have met with the developer and their architect and discussed the project on a number of occasions. They have preserved the entire green space that buffers the site from my home (I am the most impacted of anyone based upon where I live. The issue for you, and for my neighbors is quite simple, which would you rather have on this site? For me, the answer is simple. The mixed use project is a better project for the. City of Edina and the Cornelia neighborhood. Respectfully submitted, Steve Stephen H. Brown CCIM Executive Director Healthcare Real Estate Advisory P 952.837.8517 C 612.805.2232 E steve brown a(i1cushwakenm.com ILiSM E4 AIti1 Si N op—TK +1 4 .watcEIFiELb HEALTHCARE REAL ESTATE ADVISORY Stephen H. Brown 7205.Bristol Circle Edina, MN 55435 612- 805 -2232 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed project at 7200 France (Please forward to all Planning Commission Members, as well as, City Council) Dear Cary - I am writing you in support of the proposed development at 7200 France,. I intended to help facilitate a neighborhood meeting on behalf of the developer; however, I had a family emergency come up that made this impossible. As you know, I was a member of the Planning Commission for 11 years. During that time, I was appointed by the City Council to be the Chair of the West 70th Street SAC. I was also was a member of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update subcommittee that was responsible for guiding the update process within the community. I bring this up only because all three of these roles involved consideration and contemplation of the Cornelia neighborhood, as well as, the greater Southdale area of the city. Much of both the 70th Street SAC and the Comp Plan update dealt with the sensitivities associated with development in the Southdale area. In particular, the significant density that is permissible within this area, and the challenges associated with accessing it. I live directly adjacent to the proposed site. There is no residence that is more directly impacted by the redevelopment of this site. Since learning,about the project, I have had numerous discussions with the architect for the 7200 project. They have been transparent in their intent, and open to suggestions. As I learned about their plans, I indicated that my support was conditioned upon their leaving the entire area of trees on the west end of the site in tact. Nothing was to be cut down. They gave me their assurance that the tree area that buffers the site from our cul -de -sac would not be impacted. over the past several years, I have also been.privy to a number of conceptual iterations /plans associated with the 1200 site that were being contemplated by other developers. They were either office or medical office buildings, larger in scale, but consistent with the current zoning. I bring this up because as I evaluate the proposed project,` in my opinion when considering the comp plan discussions combined with the concerns raised by the Cornelia neighborhood in our 70th Street SAC meetings, the mixed use concept that is. proposed is desirable from a number of perspectives. First, it will bring residents into the neighborhood. Not just employees that are passing through (like those working at an office building). These people will view Cornelia as "their neighborhood ". Second, the restaurants will be an amenity to the neighborhood. A place that people. can walk to without having to navigate crossing France Avenue. I believe the architect has oriented the property in a desirable manner, and the upgrades they have incorporated into the medians they have proposed.are attractive. I understand that this project involves an increased FAR, however, my belief is that the residential use will be far less invasive to the Cornelia neighborhood than alternatives like a medical or general office building would be, particularly from a traffic perspective. I had hoped to be able to-attend the Planning Commission Meeting this evening; however the family emergency I mentioned earlier has made this impossible. I intend to be at the City Council Meeting when this project is heard. For purposes of tonight's meeting, please consider this letter my support for the proposed project. As always, feel free to call with any questions. Sincerely, Steve Heather Branigin From: Mary Brindle <mbrindle @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, December 01, 20141:52 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Fw: Comment on new bank Think Hi Lynette, Please forward the note below to the rest of the city council. Thanks. Mary. Mary Brindle mbrindle comcast.net 612 - 270 -9887 call or text From: Kathy Dahlheimer Sent: Monday, December, 01, 2014 1:46 PM To: mbrindle(abcomcast.net Subject: Comment on new bank Think Hello Mary ... I would have sent this to everyone but I can never find that email so I am sending this comment to you. That new bank on the promenade has two giant signs with the blue logo etc .... it is crazy... totally redundant and very unattractive on this road that is actually starting to look nice. Did planning approve all that signage or is there just no control over it. Maybe I am noticing it more because frankly I could think of many more interesting businesses that would have been a real addition to the promenade than a bank with another office so close by. But I do understand Council cannot regulate what goes in there if they meet zoning. Anyway just wondering if those signs are all within code ... I recall in years gone by a big issue about signage on France Avenue and size etc. What they have done is ugly. Anyway please forward to whomever might know about this and of course so many other big issues and plans in the city this is not that important but every time I go by I wonder about it. Thanks. Kathleen Dahlheimer i GWhitesell on 7200 project Dear Mayor Hovland, Councilwomen, and Councilmen; RE: 7200 France proposal We are in complete agreement with Planning Commission comments and recommendations to not allow the application for PUD zoning. ■ It's all about economics for the developer. They have mentioned many times that they need this scale to be economically feasible. They also need the affordable housing component to qualify for favorable financing. They paid $5.5 million for the property hoping that Edina would help them make it worth the (high) price. The community has no responsibility to share project risks, especially with only negative impact to current residents. ■ This is an inexperienced "developer". The late Robert Boisclair created an excellent portfolio of low to mid - market apartment projects. Most of these (10 of 14) have sec. 8, sec.42, or 236 financing such as Park Place Townhomes below (sec.42). According to their web site and real estate records, there has been no new development since 2006, Highlands Apartments in Bloom ington,(Sec. 8 & 42). The 7200 project would be Lori's first venture into project development in 9 years and since becoming President in 2009. 7200 France Avenue Proposal November 10, 2014 GWhitesell on 7200 project Below is a recent 5 story by the same architect. The Ellipse on Excelsior Boulevard & France hasl32 Apartments. (Image: Google Streetview) ■ Edina approaches a tipping point. 820 apartments are already under construction in the Southdale area. Traffic congestion is picking up on main EastMest cross streets. The city is spending money to protect pedestrians by upgrading crosswalks and proposing more sidewalks. These are band aides to a developing problem. 7200 France Avenue Proposal November 10, 2014 GWhitesell on 7200 project ■ Summary Edina officials have prudently spent a large amount of our dollars over the years on master planning. Comprehensive Plan, 2004 Southdale Area r Study, 2008 -2009 France Avenue improvements & pedestrian access'r 2013 Community Profile & Benchmark Analysis, 2014 I thank our officials for having the foresight to seek that planning expertise but those efforts are wasted if not followed. Retail opens many other issues on traffic and signage. Give our,-planning department time to do a small area analysis on this side of France. Please do not allow this protect to proceed and do not rezone to PUD. Architects need to be challenged to match and improve the environment of the area, not diminish it. Glen and Sharon Whitesell 7116 Heatherton Trail South Cornelia Neighborhood 7200 France Avenue Proposal 3 November 10, 2014 Heather Branigin From: David Bly <Rep.David.Bly @house.mn> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 4:05 PM Subject: Reminder. The Next Regional Passenger Rail Meeting This email is to remind you of the Intercity Passenger Rail meeting this coming this Wednesday, December 3 from 3:00- 5:00 p.m. at the Viking Theater in Buntrock Commons on the campus of St. Olaf College. If you have not done so already, please RSVP to me at this address. Location: Viking Theater in Buntrock Commons Enter Buntrock Commons main entrance. Viking Theatre will be on your right next to the Bookstore. Parking is available immediately outside Buntrock Commons at the top of the St. Olaf Hill . Campus map: http• / /www stolaf.edu/mao/ Entrance to the campus is either on the South via MN Highway 19 off of I -35; or from the East on St Olaf Ave. off of MN Highway 3. We have scheduled our next meeting to pursue an advocacy group for regional passenger rail for Wednesday, December 3 at St. Olaf College. Please RSVP to save your seat at the table. Attached find a draft of a letter we hope will become the message we need to send to MnDOT expressing support for our Regional Passenger Rail Project. We will discuss this and entertain suggestions at the meeting, but our hope is to send participants home with a comment to encourage their communities to endorse and sign the letter. Thanks to those of you who participated in our October 16 regional leaders meeting for the inter -city regional passenger rail line through Northfield! We have 20 cities and 5 counties participating in this conversation to date and we are extremely encouraged by the overwhelmingly positive message we have received on this project thus far. Following the direction provided by participants in our October meeting, I am writing to invite you to a follow -up meeting for the regional passenger rail project. Please join us Wednesday, December 3 from 3pm to 5pm at the Viking Theater in Buntrock Commons, St. Olaf College. Please respond to his a -mail with your availability or the name and contact info of your designee. Rep. David Bly 'feather Brani in From• Erin Zamoff <erinzamoff @q.com> Sent:. Monday, December 01, 2014 4:32 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: In support of more sidewalks in Edina Begin forwarded message: From: Erin Zamoff <erinzamoffCa—Dg.com? Heather Branigin � V From: Courtney Whited <courtney.whited @dartsl.org> Sent: Monday, December 011 2014'5:07 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmaii.com Cc: Mark'K.. Nolan Subject: Proposed Comp. Plan Amendments for 7200 France Ave. Good Evening Mayor. Hovland & Council Members, I wanted to share my concerns for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendents for the 7200 France. Avenue project, which will be discussed at tomorrow evening's City Council meeting. As a member of the Edina Transportation Commission, I understand and support the need to co, ' mplete a neighborhood wide transportation study before construction begins on this stated project. Looking aa map of this area of Edina, it is a known "cut through" for traffic to navigate away from 72nd and France by driving west on 72nd and turning north on Cornelia Drive and then heading west on loth Street to then enter onto Hwy. 100. This fast traffic route goes directly in front of Cornelia Elementary. My son attends this school and my daughter will be attending this school next fall. (I will be attending the Cornelia Elementary Kindergarten information meeting tomorrow.night, so [.am unable to attend the City Council meeting) My son's best friend, lives one block south of Cornelia Elementary on Cornelia Drive. His parents continually share with me that it is always unsafe for both their son and older daughter to cross the street -at 72nd and Cornelia to walk to school, because drivers either slowly roll through or simply drive through the stop sign at this corner. The City, of Edina is working on implementing a Active Routes To School Comprehensive Plan and a fantastic Sidewalk Faciity Plan. Both of these Plans include the Cornelia Elementary area l would highly recommend conducting a comprehensive traffic study of this entire 7200 France Avenue area before increasing the need for additional traffic to "cut through" the neighborhood I have described. Thank.you in advance for your kind consideration. Sincerely, Courtney L.B. Whited 5829 Chowen Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 Courtney L.B. Whited DARTS Mobility Management, Program Director courtney whited @dartsI .orct 651 - 234 -2279 phone 651 - 234 -2282 fax www.dartsl.org 4eather Branigin From: White <marisanwhite @gmail.com> Sent•. Monday, December 01, 2014 6:32 PM To: Edina Mail, Subject: Government Project Hi Mr. Hovland, My name is Marisa White I am a senior at Minnehaha Academy and I live in Edina. I am currently in a class called U.S. Government and Politics. One of the requirements is to talk to a sitting official and ask some questions by December 15th. This can either be over email or in person which ever is most convenient for you. My questions for you are: 1. What is the biggest challenge of being the mayor of Edina? 2. What would be the top 2 things you would like to accomplish as mayor? 3. What do you think it means to be liberal or conservative in America today? 4. What is your opinion on the use of medical or recreational use of marijuana ? / Do you think it should be the state's or central government's decision? 5. Do you think the two -party system is "good" for America? If you would prefer to reply to this email with the answers that would be perfect or if you could meet in person that would work too. If you could respond at your earliest convenience that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Marisa White Heather Branigin From: Lundeen, John (DOT) <john.l.lundeen @state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9 :24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Zoning changes for 7200 France To the Community Development Director, Mayor, and City Council. I want to let you know that it is my feeling that the redevelopment proposal for 7200. France should be done in compliance with the existing master plan. All the development to the east and south of the Cornelia neighborhood is changing the feel of the area, and not for the better. Thank you, John Lundeen 4525 Belvidere Lane 1 'feather Branigin From• *OSS_Secretary State <secretary.state @state.mn.us> Sent: • Tuesday, December 02, 201410:50 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: An Invitation to Event for Secretary of State Mark Ritchie Dear Mayor Hovland, The Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State invites you to a celebration event to honor outgoing Secretary of State Mark Ritchie. Secretary Ritchie is leaving office after eight years of overseeing significant progress in the administration of elections, processing business filings, establishing the nation's strongest address confidentiality program,. Safe at Home, and safeguarding the official records of the state. Please join us: • 3 -5 p.m., Wednesday, December 17. • Room 181 of the State Office Building. • Please RSVP by email to secretary.state(�state.mn.us. Sincerely yours, Joanne Spencer Joanne Spencer Administrative Specialist Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State 180 State Office Building 1 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 Joanne SpencerCoDstate.mn.us 1 (651) 201.1328 1 http• / /www.sos.state.mn.usZ 1 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday October 9, 2014 7 :04 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:04p.m. 11. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Anderson, Gubrud, Padmanabhan, Sierks, Thompson, Waddick, Zarrin, and Chair Heer Absent: Glahn, Kostuch, Rudnicki Late Arrival: Howard, Latham Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes. Member Waddick requested Item VIII.J. fourth sentence the word "barrel" get changed to "garden ". B. Attendance report and roster. No Comment. C. Workgroup list and minutes. Member Thompson requested the following Members Anderson and Padmanabhan and Sarah Stefanik to be added to the Education and Outreach Working Group. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve the amended Minutes and Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. Kirstin, Community Organizer in Edina for Conservation In MN, is going to observe the meeting. Lauren is observing the meeting. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Vision Edina. Member Sierks gave an update on the two day Vision Workshop. The first day was a team of consultants explaining future trends and challenges in the world. Then the discussion focused on what kind of community do we want Edina to be by 2040. The second day was how you address the trend forces in Edina. The first theme is balancing the City's residential and commercial redevelopment, which represents the amount and combination of single -home neighborhoods through to higher density mixed -use and urban renewal concepts. The second theme focuses on the community's fabric and character, including how socially progressive Edina becomes, demographic trends and how inward- or outward - looking the City becomes. Member Howard arrived at 7:14p.m. The next steps are an opportunity for all residents to contribute to creating the shared future vision through community workshops. Member Latham arrived at 7:24p.m. Member Howard said the workshop participants broke out into Social, Economic and Environment groups to discuss the future trends. B. Fred Richards. Mr. Bintner said Fred Richards Golf Course is transitioning from an active to a passive use park. The vision plan will be approved at the Oct. 21St Council meeting. If you have any concerns you can contact the Park Board. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No Report. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS. Chair Heer said he presented the work plan to Council on Oct. 7th. The Council will review it on own time and approve it with comments at the end of November. The work plan item coordinating with the other boards and commissions was well received. A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. Member Sierks met with consultants CRVPS and city staff to review building plans and develop a management plan for energy efficiency. Tim Barnes will get a proposal to hire the consultant and EEC will write an Advisory to support it. B. Business Recycling Working Group. Member Zarrin will put a plan together next month to recognize businesses that recycle. C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. No Report. D. Community Solar Subcommittee. Member Sierks said MN Renewable Energy Society has grants from Xcel and will do two megawatt projects. Member Sierks found an RFP from Colorado to use as a model for community solar gardens. E. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Gubrud announced Edina Day of Service on Oct. 25tH Member Howard said 10 people attended the Trouble Waters movie in September. Member Gubrud said Community Solar will be the topic for the April Event. CEE has three homes in Edina that have received certification. F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. Member Gubrud said we have 64 visits this year with 366 totals since 2007. G. Local Food Working Group. Member Latham reviewed edits City attorney and animal control officer to the ordinance. She said the ordinance needs to go to Planning Commission Information meeting on Nov. 12`h with a Public Hearing on Dec. I& then to Council. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve the report and ordinance as amended. Motion carried unanimously. H. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. No Report. I. Student Subcommittee. Member Anderson said the Compost Club is becoming more popular than Project Earth. The movie "Bag It" will be shown at the next Project Earth meeting. Member Anderson will start completing grants to raise money for the Solar Pilot Project. They currently have $1350. J. Water Quality Working Group. Member Waddick gave an update on the Storm Drain stenciling is going very well. The project will end in October or November due to weather. A Working Group Member might be attending the 9`h grade service fair on Oct. 15`h. K. 2014 EEC Summary and Schedule. Mr. Bintner suggested Mark Nolan as a guest speaker for Living Streets. Solvei Wilmot can present the Solid Waste report. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. City Project Updates. No Report. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Heer declared the meeting adjourned at 9:04p.m. Motion made by Chair Heer and seconded by Member Gubrud to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION NAME TERM JJ F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance Meetings/Work Sessions Special Meeting 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 :............ Glahn, William 2/1/2017 ........ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/3/2014 1 (enter date) 9 90% Gubrud, Bob 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% Heer, John 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Howard, John 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% Kostuch, Keith 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% Latham, Dianne Plunkett 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 75% Rudnicki, Tim 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 67% Sierks, Bill 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Thompson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Waddick, Louise 2/1/2017 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Zarrin, Sarah 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Bale, Sarah student 1 1 1 1 1 .............................. 1 6 50% Sokol, Elana student 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ..... .... ....... . 1 8 67% Anderson, Reilly student 1 1 1 3 100% Padmanabhan, Sunaya student 1 1 1 3 100% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meetina Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. 'A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 3, 2014 10:31 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 10:31 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall.were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Meeting Agenda. .Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Sprague, seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for September 2, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AUTHORIZE ENGINEERING SERVICES — DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FOR LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING COMPONENTS FOR THE FRANCE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Engineer Millner noted the City Council had approved the use of WSB, Inc. to provide engineering services for Design and Construction Inspection for the lighting and Landscaping components of the France Avenue Corridor Improvements. Commissioner Swenson made a motion authorizing Engineering Services with WSB, Inc. for Design. and Construction Inspection for Lighting and Landscaping Components of the France Avenue Corridor Improvements. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Page I (A O peen To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V. From: Bill Neuendorf Action M Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: December 2, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Extension of Purchase Agreement — 3944 West 49-1/2 Street Action Requested: Extend the closing date for the real estate transaction and authorize the Chair and Executive Director to execute the Amended Purchase Agreement. Information: On September 2, 2014, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority approved Resolution 2014 -04 and authorized the purchase of the vacant Hooten Cleaner property at 3944 West 49 -1/2 Street. This authorization occurred after the property owners approached City staff in August to inquire whether the City still was interested in purchasing the property. Although the property owners and the City originally anticipated closing within 30 -days, several complications arose during the title review process. The property owner has worked diligently to settle the outstanding issues so that the transaction can be completed. The Purchase Agreement identified December 5, 2014 as the date, after which the Agreement would be null and void. This is a standard provision in Purchase Agreements to terminate the agreement in case one of the parties is not following through with the terms. In this case, both parties have worked diligently to smooth out some complicated issues. Resolution of these issues has taken longer than expected and an extension is requested so that the transaction can be completed in mid -to -late December 2014. All other terms of the original agreement remain unchanged. The original agreed -upon purchase price is $1,550,000 in `as -is' condition. There is no additional cost to the City related to the request. Staff recommends that the Edina HRA approve this request and allow the transaction to be completed no later than December 31, 2014. Attachment: Proposed Amendment to Purchase Agreement (3- pages) and Executed Purchase Agreement (16 pages) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE AGREEMENT is dated as of December 2014, by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Purchaser ") and SOON YONG PARK and JUNG JA PARK, husband and wife, ( "Sellers "). RECITALS A. Seller and Purchaser are parties to that certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement dated September 3, 2014 ( "Purchase Agreement ") for the sale and purchase of real property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto; B. Seller and Purchaser wish to amend the Purchase Agreement as herein provided; NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Amendment to Paragraph 9. Paragraph 9 of the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: 9. CLOSING. The closing hereof shall take place on or before December 31, 2014, except as otherwise extended or terminated as provided under this Agreement (the "Closing" or "Date of Closing "). The Closing shall take place at the offices of the Title Company. At Closing, Sellers and Purchaser shall disclose their Social Security Numbers or Federal Tax Identification Numbers for the purpose of completing state and federal tax forms. 2. Amendment to Paragraph 17. Subparagraph (1) of Paragraph 17 of the Purchase Agreement is amended to read as follows: (1) IRC 1031. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with Sellers in Sellers' quest for a deferred or simultaneous § 1031 like kind exchange, provided that the Purchaser is not required to take title to any other property or to incur any further cost, expense, liability or delay. 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts or by facsimile, each of which will be deemed to be an original, but all of which, when taken together, constitute the same instrument. 179240v1 I 4. Effect of Purchase Agreement. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and'effect. Vt IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Real Estate Purchase Agreement as of the date first written above.. 1792400 PURCHASER: HOUSING AND- REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: James B. Hovland, Its Chair And: Scott Neal, Its Executive Director SELLERS: Soon Yong Park Jung Ja Park K EXHIBIT A Lega1.Description of Property The East 85 feet of the West 120 feet of the East 172 feet of the South 150 feet'6f the North ''% -6f Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision Number 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1792400 3 REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement"), dated as of the 3rd day of. T014 (the "Contract Date "), by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the, laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Purchaser ") and SOON YONG PARK and JUNG JA PARK, husband and wife, ( "Sellers "). 1. PROPERTY. In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements hereinafter contained, Seller agrees to sell and convey to Purchaser, and Purchaser agrees to buy the real property, legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto from Seller, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, together with the building constructed thereof (the Building "), the improvements located within the Building (the "Improvements "). and all and singular rights and appurtenances pertaining to the real property including, but not limited to all right, title and interest of Seller in and to adjacent streets, rights of way, easements, utility agreements, parking and other shared use agreements and all hereditaments and appurtenances pertaining thereto, if any (hereinafter referred to as the "Property "). 2. PURCHASE PRICE AND MANNER OF PAYMENT. The total, purchase price ( "Purchase Price ") for the'Property shall be payable by Purchase Price to.Seller by wire transfer at Closing (as hereinafter defined) in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and No /100 ($1,550,000.00) Dollars. 3. TITLE TO BE DELIVERED. Seller shall deliver to Purchaser, or cause to be delivered to Purchaser, at Closing, an executed Limited Warranty Deed ( "Deed ") in recordable form conveying fee simple title to the Property subject to the terms of this Agreement and: (a) Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota; (b) Building, zoning and subdivision laws and regulations consistent with the current use of the Property; (c) The lien of real estate taxes and installments of special assessments which are payable by Purchaser pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; (d) Applicable laws, regulations, zoning regulations and ordinances, whether federal, state or local; and (e) Exceptions to title which constitute encumbrances, restrictions, or easements which have been disclosed to Purchaser and accepted by Purchaser in writing; (hereinafter "Permitted Encumbrances "). 4. RELOCATION BENEFITS. Sellers are aware of Sellers' rights and payments that Sellers may be eligible to receive pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (the "Act "). Sellers acknowledge that Sellers have been given the opportunity to seek and receive the advice of legal counsel -with respect to relocation, moving, reestablishment and other costs, if any, that may be available under the Act. 177979v1 Sellers hereby acknowledge that the payment of the Purchase Price does not include a payment for Relocation Benefits. At Closing and as a condition precedent to ,Closing, Sellers will waive any right to receive any relocation payments pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. Sellers acknowledge that Sellers will make such a waiver of .Sellers' own volition and with full knowledge of the specific relocation' benefits to"which Sellers may be entitled. Sellers and Purchaser agree that this is a voluntary sale by Sellers. Purchaser represents that Purchaser would not acquire the Property in the event that negotiations between Sellers and Purchaser had failed to result in an amicable agreement. Prior to any action by Purchaser indicating intent to acquire the Property, Sellers placed the Property on the market for sale. Thereafter, upon inquiry by the Purchaser, Sellers requested that Purchaser acquire the Property through negotiation. Sellers, clearly showed intent to sell the Property on the open market prior to any discussions, inquiries or negotiations by Purchaser. If the transaction set forth by this Agreement is not completed, Purchaser has no present intent to acquire the property by eminent domain and has not considered the use of eminent .domain. If this Agreement is terminated for any reason, Sellers are free to retain ownership of the Property or to sell the Property on the private market. As Purchaser and Sellers agree that this is a voluntary sale, state and federal law permit the Purchaser to request a waiver of relocation benefits from Sellers, as provided under Minnesota Statute Section 117.521. Prior to and as a condition of Closing, Sellers will be required to sign a relocation waiver, the form of which is substantially the same as shown on Exhibit `B" and the final form will be subject to the approval of Purchaser ( "Relocation Waiver "). Purchaser will arrange for a relocation consultant to meet with Sellers prior to Closing. If Sellers do not waive relocation benefits, this Agreement will be terminated and Sellers will be free to retain ownership of the Property or sell on the private market. 5. EVIDENCE OF TITLE. (a) Within twenty (20) days following the date of execution of this Purchase Agreement, Purchaser shall obtain a commitment for an ALTA Owner's Form title insurance policy (the "Commitment ") issued by Land Title, Inc. (the "Title Company "), pursuant to which the Title Company agrees to issue to the Purchaser upon the recording of the documents of conveyance referred to herein an Owner's title insurance policy insuring the Property in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. The Commitment shall include proper searches covering bankruptcies, state and federal judgments and liens and levied and pending special assessments, which Commitment: (1) Insures that Purchaser has marketable title of record to the Property, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, leases, claims and charges, all material easements, rights -of -way, covenants, conditions and restrictions and any other matters affecting title, except for Permitted Encumbrances. (2) Waives or agrees to insure over the following standard exceptions: 177979v1 2 (A) Facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive survey of the Property, if Purchaser obtains, prior to the Closing Date, at Purchaser's sole expense, a survey satisfactory to the Title Company for purpose of waiving the standard exception for survey matters; (B) Rights and claims of parties in possession; and (C) Mechanic's, contractor's and, material liens and lien claims. (b) Purchaser shall have fifteen (15) days after receipt of the Commitment to deliver to Seller written objections to title based on marketability of the Property ( "Objections ") and Seller shall have sixty (60) days to have such Objections removed or satisfied, during which period the Closing Date shall be postponed, if necessary. If Seller fails or is unable to have such Objections removed within said time, Purchaser may, at its sole election, do any of the following: (1) Termination. Terminate this Agreement without any liability on its part in exchange for a quit claim deed for the Property. (2) Escrow for Cure. If the parties agree to an escrow, Seller shall escrow an 'amount sufficient to assure cure of the. Objection(s). Any amount so escrowed will be placed in an escrow with title pending such cure. If such escrow is established, the parties agree to execute . and deliver such documents as may be reasonably required by the Title Company, and Seller agrees to pay the charges of the Title Company to create and administer the escrow. (3) Purchaser Cure. To the extent an Objection can be satisfied by the payment of money, Purchaser shall have the right to pay the amount necessary to satisfy such Objection and the amount so applied shall be reimbursed to Purchaser by Seller or, to the extent the amount is less-than the Purchase Price, deducted from the Purchase Price at the Closing, provided, that the amount due -to the third -parry claimant is an undisputed liquidated amount for which Seller's liability is undisputed. Notwithstanding the limitation, waiver, and relinquishment of remedies in Section 16, if Purchaser funds such a cure of monetary objection; and is not reimbursed at Closing_by Seller, Purchaser shall have a right of action to recover from Seller an, amount equal to the dollar amount of Seller's undisputed and liquidated liability. (4) Waiver. Waive such objections and .take title to the Property subject to such objections. 177979v1 3 6. REPRESENTATIONS OF SELLER. On information and belief, without special investigation, Sellers hereby represent to Purchaser: (a) That Sellers have the requisite power and authority to enter into this Purchase Agreement and the closing documents relating thereto to be signed by it; that the execution, delivery and performance by Sellers of such documents do not conflict with or result in violation of any judgment, order or decree of any court to which Sellers are a party; such documents are valid and binding obligations of Sellers. (b) At Closing, there will be no existing claims, actions, suits or other proceedings pending, or to the knowledge of Sellers, threatened by any governmental department or agency,. or any other corporation, partnership or entity or person whomsoever against Sellers or the Property, which in any manner or to any extent may detrimentally affect the Property or Purchaser's right, title or interest in and to any part or all of the Property after Closing. (c) Other than Sellers, there are no other tenants or occupants of the Property. (d) On the Date of Closing there will be no (i) outstanding leases or occupancy agreements, or (ii) outstanding contracts made by Sellers for any improvements to the Property which have not been fully paid for or for which Sellers shall not have made arrangements to pay off, at Closing, or that will affect the Property or be binding upon Purchaser or upon the Property subsequent to Closing without Purchaser's written consent; and Sellers shall cause to be discharged all mechanic's or materialmen's liens arising from any labor or materials furnished to the Property that were made at the request of Sellers, its agents, or contractors, prior to the Date of Closing and any mortgages or other such similar encumbrances. (e) Until the Date of Closing, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Sellers shall maintain the land associated with the Property in its present condition, reasonable wear and tear and damage by casualty excepted. (f) Sellers are not a foreign person; as such term is defined in Section 1445(f) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall deliver an affidavit to that effect at closing, which shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Purchaser. (g) To Sellers' knowledge, except as disclosed in the documentation provided to Purchaser pursuant to Section 1 and as,documented in the Barr Engineering Phase I ESA (August 9, 2013) and Summary Report of Limited Phase II (September 18, 2013) on behalf of Purchaser, (i) no toxic materials, hazardous wastes or hazardous substances, as such terms are defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1996, as amended (42 U.S.C. §6901, et seMc .) or in the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (42 U.S.C. §9601, et seq.), including, without limitation, any asbestos or asbestos - related products or materials and any oils, petroleum- derived 1779790 4 compounds or pesticides ( "Hazardous Materials ") have been generated, treated, stored, released or disposed of or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Property; and (ii) the Property is free of Hazardous Materials and is not subject to any "superfund" type liens or claims by governmental regulatory agencies or third parties arising from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances in, on, or about the Property. (h) To Sellers' knowledge, the conveyance of the Property pursuant hereto. will not violate any currently existing applicable statute, ordinance, governmental restriction or regulation, or any private restriction or agreement to which Sellers are a party. (i) To Sellers' knowledge, there are no underground storage tanks or wells on the Property, it being understood that the representation as to wells shall be recited in the Deed to be delivered by Seller at Closing. (j) To the best of Sellers' knowledge, Sellers represent that methamphetamine production has not occurred on the Property. '(k) Solely for purposes of satisfying the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 115.55, Sellers certify that, to Sellers' knowledge, there is no "individual sewage treatment system" (within the meaning of that statute) on or serving the Property. Seller certifies that sewage generated on the Property goes to a facility permitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Except as herein expressly stated, Purchaser is purchasing the Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Seller or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property "as is, where is" subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties herein contained. The representations set forth in this section shall be continuing and shall be true and convect as of the Date of Closing with the same force and effect as if made at that time and shall survive the Closing for a period of two (2) years. 7. REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AND ACCESS TO PROPERTY. Within twenty (20) days of the execution of this Agreement, Sellers agree to provide Purchaser with all of the following documentation: (a) True and correct copies of all existing environmental assessment reports, soil reports and results of all soil tests and environmental assessments in Seller's possession; (b) Surveys, permits, licenses, leases, complete copies of all contracts currently affecting the Property readily available or Sellers' possession ( "Other Agreements "), and notices received within the last 90 days from the city, state or other governmental authorities pertaining to uncured violations of any law, ordinance or regulation. 177979v1 5 Sellers" obligation to provide the foregoing documentation shall continue for any such documentation that Sellers receive following execution of this Agreement and prior to Closing. Sellers acknowledge that Purchaser and Purchaser's agents shall have access to the Property without charge and at reasonable times for the purpose of Purchaser's survey, investigation and testing of the . Property ( "Investigation'). Purchaser shall pay all costs and expenses of Investigation and Purchaser'shall hold harmless and indemnify the Property and Sellers, their heirs, successors and assigns, from .and against any and all claims, suits, losses, liabilities, and expenses (including attorney's fees, expert's fees, and other expenses of litigation) on account of injury to or death of any persons (including Purchaser's) or damage to property or contamination of or adverse effects on the environment or liens against Seller or the Property, caused by Purchaser's entry onto the Property. Purchaser's obligations under this Section 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement or the Closing. Purchaser shall repair and restore any damage to the Property caused by or occurring during Purchaser's Investigation and return the Property to substantially the same condition as existed prior to any Investigation. Purchaser shall have the right in its sole discretion to contact various public officials and administrators to verify information regarding the status of the Property and to determine that the Property is suitable for Purchaser's intended use. 8. PURCHASER'S CONTINGENCIES. The obligations of Purchaser under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon the following: (a) The representations of Sellers contained in this Agreement must be true now and as of the Closing Date, as if made on the Closing Date and Sellers shall have delivered to Purchaser on the Closing Date, a certificate, signed by Sellers, certifying that such representations are true as of the Closing Date (the "Bring - down Certificate "), except to the extent that the representations are no longer true and acceptable to Purchaser. (b) Title to the Property and easements to be acquired under this Agreement shall be held by Sellers on the Closing Date, and shall be free and clear of all encumbrances except the Permitted Encumbrances. (c) Purchaser shall be satisfied, in its reasonable discretion, with the results of any Investigation conducted by Purchaser or Seller on the Property. (d) Sellers, as owners of the Property, agree to sign a voluntary waiver of all relocation assistance, services, payments and benefits as set forth in Minnesota Statute Section 117.521, as required under Section 4. (e) Sellers shall perform all of the obligations required to be performed under this Agreement, as and when required by this Agreement, except as waived by Purchaser. 1779790 (f) Purchaser having determined that it is satisfied with its review and analysis of all documents required to be provided by Seller under Section 7. (g) No suit, zoning change, governmental investigation or other proceeding challenging the transactions contemplated hereby, shall have been threatened or instituted. If the contingencies set forth herein have not been satisfied or waived by Purchaser by the Closing Date, as otherwise extended, Agreement shall be null and void and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder, except for Purchaser's indemnity obligations pursuant to Section; 7. The contingencies set forth in this section are for. the sole and exclusive benefit of Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have the right,,to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Seller, provided Purchaser abides by the time requirements set forth above. 9. CLOSING. The closing hereof shall take place on or before October 9, 2014, except as otherwise extended or terminated as provided under this Agreement (the "Closing" or "Date of Closing "). The Closing shall take place at the offices of the Title Company. If Closing does not occur on or before December 5, 2014, this Agreement shall be null and void; Purchaser shall execute a quitclaim deed for the Property in favor of Sellers, and neither party shall have any further obligations hereunder, except for Purchaser's indemnity obligations pursuant to Section 7. At Closing, Sellers and Purchaser shall disclose their Social Security Numbers or Federal Tax Identification Numbers for the purpose of completing state and federal tax forms. M SELLERS' OBLIGATIONS AT CLOSING. On or prior to the Date .of Closing, Sellers shall: (a) Execute, acknowledge and. deliver, to 'Purchaser the Deed to the Property conveying to Purchaser marketable fee simple title to the Property subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances. (b) Execute and/or deliver to Purchaser such' other documents as may be ,required by this Agreement or as may be reasonably required by Title Company, including well disclosures and sewage treatment system disclosures. (c) Deliver to Purchaser a standard form affidavit by the Sellers indicating that on the Date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Sellers or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic's liens could be filed; and that there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property. (d) Deliver to Purchaser a "bring- down" certificate, certifying that all of the representations made by Sellers in this Agreement remain true as of the Date of Closing, subject to exceptions or events occurring subsequent to this Purchase Agreement that are acceptable to Purchaser. 1779790 7 (e) Execute and deliver to Purchaser a waiver of relocation benefits as required under Section 4. 11. PURCHASER'S OBLIGATIONS AT CLOSING. At Closing and subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions hereof and the performance by Sellers of their obligations as set forth above, Purchaser shall (a) Deliver to Sellers by wire transfer the balance of the Purchase Price, less any adjustments. (b) Execute and/or deliver to Sellers such other documents as may be required by this Agreement or as maybe reasonably required by Title Company. 12. CLOSING COSTS. The following costs and expenses shall be paid as follows in connection with the Closing: (a) Sellers shall pay: (1) Sellers' attorneys' fees; (2) The cost of preparing the Commitment; (3) The cost of recording the satisfaction of any existing mortgage and any other reasonable document(s) necessary to make title marketable; (4) The cost of preparation of the Deed and other documents of conveyance and the cost for state deed tax; (5) The cost of- engineers or other consultants, if any, engaged by Purchaser regarding the Property. (6) Operating expenses relating to the Property incurred for the period prior to the Closing Date; and (7) One -half of the closing fee charged by Title Company for the Closing between Seller and Purchaser. (b) Purchaser shall pay the following costs in connection with the Closing: (1) The cost of the premium and endorsements issued pursuant to the Commitment. (2) Filing fee required to record the Deed and costs and filing fees for documents to be recorded that are not required to be paid by Sellers. (3) Purchaser's attorneys' fees. 1779790 8 (4) One -half of the closing fee charged by ;Title Company for the Closing between Seller and Purchaser. (5) The cost of engineers or other consultants, if any, engaged by Purchaser regarding the Property. 13. UTILITIES, TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. (a) Sellers shall pay all utilities, general real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable in the year prior to the Date of Closing and in years prior thereto. Utilities, real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable in and for the year of closing shall be prorated between Sellers and Purchaser on a calendar year basis tothe actual Date of Closing; (b) Sellers shall pay all costs charged by the City pursuant to Section 24 -167 of the Edina City Code incurred during 2613, due and payable .in 2014, . and a pro rata portion of costs incurred during 2014 due and payable in 2015 based on the budgeted amount for the Property of$2,066:74 to the Date of Closing. (c) Purchaser shall pay utilities, real estate , taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable after the actual Date of Closing. 14. CONTROL OF PROPERTY. Prior to the Date of Closing, Sellers shall. have the full responsibility and the entire. liability for any and all damages or injuries of. any kind whatsoever to the Property, to any and all persons, whether employees:.or otherwise, except liability arising from the activities.`of ?Purchaser, its agents, contractors or employees. Any removable fixtures, equipment or personal property left at the Property after the Date of Closing, shall be considered abandoned by Sellers and Purchaser shall be free to dispose of these items`in, . any manner it chooses at its sole discretion. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement, Sellers shall indemnify; defend and hold Purchaser free and harmless from and against any and all claims, obligations and liability (and attorneys' fees and court costs in connection therewith) arising out of the Property or any portion thereof from any event, occurrence, act, or failure to act prior to Closing and Purchaser shall indemnify, defend and hold Sellers free and harmless from and against any and all claims, obligations and liability (and attorneys' fees and court costs in connection therewith) arising out of the Property or any portion thereof from any event, occurrence, act, or failure to act after Closing. 15. POSSESSION. Sellers shall deliver possession of the Property to Purchaser on the Date of Closing. 16. DEFAULT; REMEDIES. If Sellers have performed or are ready, willing and able to perform all obligations required by this Agreement and Purchaser shall fail or refuse to perform this Agreement within the time and in the manner provided, then Sellers' sole remedy shall be termination of this Agreement, in which case the parties, shall have no further rights and obligations hereunder other than those rights and/or obligations which are expressly stated to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 1779790 9 If Purchaser has performed or is ready, willing, and able to perform all obligations required by this Agreement and Sellers shall fail or refuse.to perform this Agreement within the time and in the manner provided, then Purchaser, at its option may terminate this Agreement by !giving written notice thereof to Sellers, in which case the parties shall have no further rights and obligations., hereunder other than those rights and/or obligations which are expressly stated to survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. The following general provisions govern this Agreement: (a) Time is of the Essence. The Date of Closing, as the same may be ..extended pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, is of the absolute essence. (b) Governing Law. This Agreement,is made . and executed under and in all respects is to be governed and construed under the laws of the State of Minnesota. (c) Notices. Any notice required to be given to Sellers. or Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement is given in accordance with this Agreement if it is in writing and if it is directed to Sellers by.delivering it personally, or if it is directed to Purchaser, by delivering it personally'to the Executive Director of Purchaser, or if mailed in a : sealed wrapper, by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized reputable overnight courier, property addressed as follows: Seller: Soon Yong and Jung Ja Park 5275 Grandview: Square #3308 Edina, MN 55436 Purchaser: Edina HRA Attn: Executive Director 4801 West 50'x' Street Edina, MN 55424 „ With a copy to: Andrea McDowell Poehler Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or.the date of deposit as aforesaid, provided, however, that if notice is given by deposit, the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to. run one business day after any such deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice •by. giving written notice of such change to the other party, in any manner above specified, 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. (d) Purchaser's Waiver Rights. Purchaser may, at its option, waive any right conferred upon the Purchaser by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided 177979v1 10 herein, such waiver. may be made only by giving Sellers written notice specifically describing the right waived., (e) Survival. Except, as, otherwise stated herein, all of the terms of this Agreement Will survive and be enforceable for, a,period of two (2) years after the Closing. (f) Amendment. This Agreement shall be amended only by a written instrument signed by Sellers and Purchaser. (g) Brokerage. Each party hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the other harmless of any claim made by a broker or sales agent or similar party for a commission due or alleged to be due on this transaction on the basis of an agreement with said broker made by the indemnifying party. The parties' obligations set forth in this section shall survive termination or consummation of this Agreement. (h) Assigmnent. Except for an assignment by Sellers to The Park Property, LLC, neither Sellers nor Purchaser shall assign this Agreement or its rights hereunder without the express written consent of the other, which may be withheld by the other in its sole discretion. (i) Benefit. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Sellers and Purchaser and their respective successors and assigns (j) Construction. The captions and headings of the various sections of "this.: Agreement are for convenience only and are not to be construed as defining or .as, limiting in any way the scope or intent of the provisions hereof. Wherever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, the plural shall`' include singular, and the masculine, feminine and neuter shall be. freely. interchangeable. (k) Counterparts. For the convenience of the parties, any number of counterparts hereof may be executed and each such executed counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one in the same Agreement. (1) IRC 1033. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with Sellers in Sellers' quest for tax deferral pursuant to Section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Sellers acknowledge that any exchange shall be at no cost to Purchaser and shall not release or diminish Sellers' obligations and liability under this Agreement. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 1779790 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall evidence but one agreement. SELLERS: C4 Soon Yong P J Ja I c rl 177979v1 e i 9 E l s o S -1 PURCHASER: HOUSING AND �EDEVELOPMIENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, 4P. N)�SOTA James WHovlaad, Its Chair And: S -2 177979vl EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property The East 85 feet of the West 120 feet of the East 172 feet of the South 150 feet of the North V2 of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision Number 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A -1 177979v1 EXHIBIT B Agreement Regarding Release, Payment and Assignment of Relocation Benefits THIS AGREEMENT REGARDING WAIVER AND ASSIGNMENT OF RELOCATION BENEFITS (this "Agreement") is made as of , 2014, by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Purchaser ")and SOON YONG PARK and JUNG JA PARK, husband and wife, ( "Sellers "). RECITALS: Sellers and Purchaser entered into a purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") dated as of , 2014, related to property located at 3944 West 49 %z Street, Edina, Minnesota. Sellers have been advised of their rights and payments that Sellers may be eligible to receive pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (the "Act"), including payments for Minimum Compensation under Minn. Stat. 117.87. Sellers acknowledge they have sought and received the advice of legal counsel and have been specifically advised as to relocation, moving, reestablishment, and other costs that may be available to the Sellers under the Act. Sellers and Purchaser desire to enter into this Agreement to confirm their understanding of the Sellers' release, sale and assignment of any claim for any relocation benefits and/or other relocation costs due or payable to Sellers, whether pursuant to the Act or otherwise. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective as of the date hereof, Sellers hereby acknowledge that the sale of the Property is voluntary sale and not under threat of condemnation and the payment of the Purchase Price does not includes payment for Relocation Benefits and Minimum Compensation Benefits and hereby release Purchaser from any liability for payment of additional relocation payments pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. 2. Effective as of the date hereof, Sellers hereby. sell, transfer and assign to Purchaser any benefits, payments, claims, or other rights due or payable to Sellers pursuant to the Act (or other federal or state law provisions) with respect to the Property. 3. Sellers acknowledge that they have freely waived such rights of their own volition. B -1 1779790 4. Sellers acknowledge that they have waived such rights with full knowledge of the specific relocation benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled. 5. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 6. This Agreement shall be null and void if the Purchase Agreement shall terminate or if Closing under the Purchase Agreement shall fail to occur- for any reason. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Waiver of Relocation Benefits Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written. SELL S: ZW on ong Park Jug- /0a PURCHASER: HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, SOTA . Hovlarit Its Chair And: 177979v1 B_2