Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-12-16_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY DECEMBER" 169 2014 7:00 PM. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA 7:05 p.m.- IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of December 2, 2014, Work Session Of December 2, 2014 and Town Hall Meeting of December 6, 2014 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 12/04/2014 TOTAL $1,713,367.63 And Per Pre -List Dated 12/11/2104 TOTAL $1,780,977.41 C. Request For Purchase: One 2015 Ford Police Interceptor D. Request For Purchase: Public Safety Class A Uniform E. Authorize Agreement With' Expert T Billing For Ambulance Billing Services F. Request For Purchase: Authorize Engineering Services For Arden Park D Neighborhood, Bid Documents And Construction Phase Services G. Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2014 H. Cell Tower Lease Renewal At Creek Valley Park Communications Facility 1. Request For Purchase:. Construction Manager Contract Braemar Clubhouse Renovation J. - Approve Easement Agreement, 4420 Grimes Avenue K. Request To Waive Building Permit Fees For The Braemar Clubhouse Renovation Project V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 7.10 p.m. A. Edina High School Student Partnership With Precision Gasket Company P.M. B. Speak Up Edina Report: Residential Fire Sprinklers VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS Agenda/Edina City Council Dec. 16, 2614 Page 2 During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff' members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure, fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public^hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to .three: minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary.. Try not to repeat remarks .6� -.O. ints of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment 'for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is . not allowed. 7:20 p.m. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Vacation.Of Public Right -Of -Way Easement 5320 Kelsey Terrace, Resolution No. 2014 -160 (Affirmative Majority Vote of Council Members Present to Approve.) 7:30 p.m. B. PUBLIC HEARING — Vacation Of Public Right -Of -Way Easement Countryside Elementary School, 5701 Benton Avenue; Resolution No. 2014 -161 (Affirmative Majority Vote of Council Members Present to Approve.) 7:40 p.m. C. CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO FEBRUARY 3, 2015 — Ordinance No. 2014 -25 Amending Chapters I0 & 32, Regarding. Regulation And Protection Of Trees On Low Density Residential Property 7:45 p.m. D. PUBLIC HEARING — Proposed Transfer Of Cable TV Franchise From Comcast To Midwest Cable, Resolution No. 2014 -164 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) 8:15 p.m. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor.may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the_ interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) 8:20 p.m. A. Resolution No. 2014 -162 Setting 201'5 Tax Levy And Adopting 2015 Operating Budget 8:35 p.m. B. Consider Approval of 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Program 8:50 p.m. C. Resolution No. 2014 -163 Accepting Various.Grants & Donations 8:55 p.m. D. Comprehensive Plan Amendments For Building Height, Density And Floor Area Ratio; Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan , 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC, Resolution No. 2014 -150 and Resolution No. 2014 -151 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment requires favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass. Preliminary Rezoning requires favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass.) 5 Q Agenda/Edina City Council Dec. 16, 2014 Page 3 9:10 P.M. E. Sketch Plan Review — 4500 Valley View Road (Wally's Gas Station Building) 0 P.M. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Planning Commission, October 22, 2014 2. Park Board, November 10, 2014 3. Arts & Culture Commission, September 23, October 23 & November 20, 2014 4. Heritage Preservation Board, November 10, 2014 9:35 p.m. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE 9:40 p.m. XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS 9:55 p.m. XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS 10:00 P.M. XIII. ADJOURNMENT. The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Dec 16 Closed Session — Land Acquisition 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 16 Work Session — Boards & Commissions Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Park Strategic Plan Input 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Thur Dec 25 CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Wed Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closes at noon Thur Jan I NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 6 Work Session — Promenade Plan 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Legislative Agenda 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 19 REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 20 Work Session — Vision Edina 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Feb 3 Work Session —joint Session With Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 16 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Feb 17 Work Session —joint Meeting W/ Planning Commission & Two -Step 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Redevelopment Process Tues Feb 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS =s Mar 3 Work Session — Private Sanitary Sewer 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM State of Utilities 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM .,es Mar 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 17 Work Session — Park Strategic Plan Progress Report 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting With Housing Foundation Affordable Housing Policy 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Mar 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4# MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY: COUNCIL `HELD AT-CITY HALL DECEMBER 2, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, � seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. - CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session (meeting minutes of November 318, 2014 W.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 20, 2014, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $96,332.20; Police Special Revenue $1,203.72; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $100.00; Arts and Culture Fund $500.00; Working Capital Fund $493,056.20; Equipment Replacement Fund $;1 1,185,00; Art Center Fund $1,541.69; Golf 'Dome Fund $3,701.96; Aquatic Center Fund $1,512.70; Golf Course Fund $17,620.49; Ice Arena Fund $45,499.36; Sports Dome Fund $1,379.60;.ldlinborough Park Fund $11,446.46; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,389.16; Liquor Fund $287,234.11; Utility Fund $.17;755.17; Storm Sewer Fund'$1,025.37;'Recyclin&Fund $35,211.06; PSTF Agency Fund $1;144.32; Grandview TIF - District $170.27; Valleyview/Wooddale TIF District $100.00; Payroll Fund $3,038:20;x.; TOTAL $1,035.147.04 and for receipt of payment of claims dated November 27, 2014, and consisting of 56 pages; General ' Fund $406,028.08; Police Special Revenue $334.30; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $134,777.66; Working Capital .Fund $561,518.92; Equipment Replacement :Fund $170,562.98; Art Center Fund $912.82; Golf Dome Fund $55.34; Aquatic Center. Fund $109.79; Golf Course .Fund .$1,801.73; Ice: Arena Fund $23,784.22; - Sports Dome Fund $6,413:00; Edinborough .Park Fund $4,355.86; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,849.72; Liquor Fund $399,626.61; Utility Fund $766,233.98; Storm Sewer Fund $9,338.58; PSTF Agency Fund $15,876.69; Centennial TIF District $4,956.26; Payroll Fund $7,63291; TOTAL $2,518,169.45 W.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -147 approving Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2015 IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -148, approving 2015 Park and Recreation Fees IV.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -149, approving Deferral of Special Assessments I.Y.F. Schedule Public Hearing (December 16, 2014) to consider Application for Transfer of the Cable System from Comcast of Minnesota, Inc. to. Midwest Cable, Inc. W.G. Approve Revised 2015 Council Meeting Dates, Board and Commission Meeting Dates, and Dates of Religious Observance W.H. Request for Purchase, Authorize Non - Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition . Assessment Services, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. at $109,125.00 . Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2,.2014 R IV.I. Adopt- Resolution No. 2014 -154, approving Minnesota Department of Health Community Health Board Grant Project Agreement W.J. Approve 2015 Human Services Task Force Recommendation W.K. Approve 2015 -2016 Union Contract for International Association of Firefighters Local 1275: Paramedics /Firefighters Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. DECEMBER 13TH EDINA ROBOTICS DAY —PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the Proclamation declaring December 13, 2014 as Robotics Day in the City of Edina. Member Sprague made a. motion, seconded by Member Bennett, adopting the Proclamation naming Saturday, December 13, 2014-as Robotics Day in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland invited lain McIntyre, co- mentor, and members of the team forward to be recognized. Erika Ding, Safety Captain, thanked the City Council and supporters for accomplishing the Proclamation. She shared that on December 13, 2014, three robotics tournaments would be held at Edina High School and Valley View Middle School. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice. presented and ordered placed• on file. VITA. 201S OPERATING BUDGET— PRESENTED Manager Neal shared that this step was important in the process of approval.. The major change was the addition of a debt service component due to Braemar Field. A positive was,that tax capacity increased by 14% due to larger developments and increased value of properties. Finance Director Romeman presented the staff proposed 2015 budget and levy and shared that the public hearing was the last step before the Council was required to adopt a final 2015 budget and levy at the December 1.6, 201'4, .:City Council meeting. Mr. Roggeman shared the 2015 through 2019 Capital Improvement Plan and explained the City had a Biennial Budget Process. On the even numbered years, the City focused on the Capital Improvement Plan and on the odd numbered years, the City focused on the Operating Budget. Mr. Roggeman noted that residents, the Council, and City-staff have identified many important projects to work on, but the City would need to prioritize the'most important projects because there were not funds to complete all of the projects. Finding new funding- sources for the Capital Improvement Plan would, be important in the next few years in order to continue to maintain and improve the infrastructure and facilities.- Mr. Roggeman presented the 2015 Operating Budget and Tax Levy. There were a total of nine proposed, levies for 2015 for a total of $29,700,010. The - .increase in debt levies was mainly due to the. construction.of Braemar Field. However; the decertification of the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District ' was added back to the City's general tax rolls for aw14% increase in tax base. IThe Council asked if the increase would change the tax notices sent to taxpayers. Mr. Neal responded that the notices already reflected that positive change. Assessor Wilson explained that the proposed tax alues were mailed in March 2014 along with tax statements and the statements explained the appeal process. Citizens may contact the Assessing Officer and work with City Staff. If they wish they can come before the City's Board of Appeal and Equalization. Further, citizens can file an appeal with the County There were no costs associated with the appeals process. The values were set when the County Board met in June! The Council asked' about property tax relief for eligible property owners '.,.....,...tea dPdj Mr. Wilson replied that the program, called the Homestead,: Credit Refund and administered -,by the Minnesota Department of Revenue, had expanded in 2013 in order to increase eligibility. It compared household income to property taxes and if eligible, provided a property tax refund. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2, 2014 There was also a Special Property Tax Refund Program that was not based on income. If a home's property taxes increased more than 12 %, that property was eligible for a refund. Mr: Roggeman reviewed the estimated tax impact t a single family residential prope^rt�. The estimated median market valued had increased from $400,000 to $438,800 for 2015, a 9.7% increase. The estimated City portion of taxes would increase from $1,141 to $1,193, a 4.56% increase. Mr. Roggeman then compared Edina's taxes to other Hennepin County cities through tax rate history, tax per capita, and total revenue. The Council confirmed that General Fund levy (what it takes to operate the City) included an increase of 1.89 %, but the Debt Service Fund levy boosted the total to +8 %. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. Public Testimony Jim Gratz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Wilson addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating that a large amount of real- estate turn over in an area should not affect a property's valuation. The methodology was the same, to compare generated values to prices of homes sold. Mr. Wilson answered a question of the Council concerning the Board of Appeals and Equalization, indicating that the Board was comprised of five members who were residents of the City of Edina and have vast real estate experience. Most disagreements over a valuation were handled informally, but if that does not resolve the issue, the property owner could appeal to Hennepin County or file a case in Tax Court. VI.B. 2015 BUILDING FEES AND LIQUOR LICENSE FEES, AMENDING SECTION 2 -724 SCHEDULE A SETTING FEES FOR 2015 — ORDINANCE NO. 2014-21-- ADOPTED Mr. Roggeman presented the Building fees and Liquor License fees that were proposed to increase from 2014 . to 2015. He answered a question of the Council, indicating that the building permit fee changes were recommended by the Building Division because of the demand for permits and staff time involved. The liquor fees tend to increase each year. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -21, Amending Section 2 -724 Schedule A Setting Fees for 201 S. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council/December-2,,2014, VI.C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR BUILDING HEIGHT, DENSITY, AND FLOOR AREA RATIO, PRELIMINARY REZONING, AND .PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 7200 FRANCE AVENUE, 7200 LLC — RESOLUTION. NO. 2014 -ISO AND RESOLUTION NO. 2014-ISI — TABLED TO DECEMBER 16, 2014 AND STAFF DIRECTED TO PREPARE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST Community Development Director Presentation Community. Development Director Teague presented a request from 7200 LLC to redevelop the property at 7200 France Avenue. The proposal was to tear down the, existing office building and redevelop it with a four- and five -story mixed use development project that included 160 apartments, 20,000 feet of retail space, and a' two -level underground parking ramp. Mr. Teague described the plan changes made by: the applicant based on discussions with the Planning Commission and Council. Mr. Teague outlined the steps required for approval, noting Wenck Associates had completed a traffic study. A shadow study was also completed that showed more impact during the winter months than in the summer months. The Watershed District had drainage concerns; however, an infiltration tank would require more tree removal. The Planning Commission and City staff recommended denial of both requests. The Planning Commission further recommended completion of a Small Area Plan for the Office Residential designated land on the west side ofr France Avenue. . The Council asked questions relating to the Lennar project as it compared to this one concerning setbacks. The Council also asked about traffic volume if a developer built without requiring a variance. Ed Terhaar baba , Traffic Consultant, reported that the existing use generated 437 trips per day. The proposed use, (with variance) could generate 2,580 trips, per day. A combined use of medical and restaurant (no variance) could generate 2,978 trips per day. Mr. Terhaar also answered questions of the Council relating to cut through traffic, stating that the opportunity exists and was difficult to control. Speed humps and other traffic calming tools could be used, but at a cost. Proponent Presentation' Dean Dovolis, DJR Architecture, presented architectural highlights of the project and addressed traffic concerns, noting the project planned equal consideration for car, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic. Lori Boisclair; Boisclair Corporation, shared that this team of developers 'won' this site because the previous owner liked this plan for mixed use. Ms. Boisclair reported that the site would have 32'affordable housing units that were committed for 30 years. The project would allow life cycle renewal within the community. Ms. Boisclair discussed Floor Area Ratio and building height. Adam Seraphine, NH,H Properties, reported that the developers were aware of resident contention with increased density. The developers were excited about the project, but wanted to be mindful of the residents' and the, Planning Commission's concerns. Mr. Seraphine noted that requiring a lower density would mean losing some of the great amenities such as underground parking and bicycle facilities. Mr. Seraph ine,shared a Plan B for the site for a medical office building should this plan not be approved. Mr. Dovolis answered questions of the Council relating to telework and bicycle amenities. Ms. Boisclair answered questions of the Council relating to types of retail such as yoga, fitness, wine bar, etc. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:12 p.m. Public Testimon Stephen Brown, 7205 Bristol Circle, addressed the Council. Sophia Wright, 7309 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Dan Oberpriller, 5808 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. James Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, Edina Housing Foundation, addressed the Council. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2, 201:4 Julie Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed,the Council. Glen Whitesell, 7116 Heatherton Trail, addressed the Council. Nancy Thorvilson, 7221 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Harvey Turner, 7315 Glouchester Drive, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Council. Stephen Andersen, 7204 Bristol Circle, addressed the Council. Jan Zahorsky, 7129 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Council. Michele Debrey, 7112 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the,Council. Lori Prebil, 4504 Claremore Court, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by -Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Ted T of .answered a question of the Council, indicating that traffic forecasts from other new projects were included when the traffic forecast for this project was developed. Attorney Knutson answered a question of the Council, indicating that if the Comprehensive Plan amendment was approved, the changes would be applied to the designated land use and would not apply to other locations. Mr. Knutson also advised that the owner had the legal right to use the land as 'it was zoned and guided. Sheldon Berg, DJR Architecture, answered questions of the Council relating to flooding issues, indicating that the developer was aware of potential flooding and remedies were being sought. The Council asked Mr. Neal to share how the City interacts with the school districts. Mr. Neal explained that the City had regular exchanges with all of the school districts within Edina and a joint demographic study had recently been completed. The Council discussed the option of moving project traffic to France Avenue instead of allowing resident use of 72nd Avenue. Mr. Dovolis noted that the developers would ,approve of that action, but would need the City.'s help in seeking County approval. Mr. Teague answered a question of the Council concerning other instances where the Comprehensive Plan had been amended. The Council discussed the conditions it would need to approve this project including a curb cut on France Avenue of sufficient size to handle all traffic, a maximum height of sixty-three feet- eliminating the penthouse, non - motorized amenities, telework amenities, and retail uses to be defined as part of the Planned Unit Development. The Council directed staff to rewrite Resolution. No. 2014 -150 and Resolution No. 2014 -151 with the discussed findings and conditions of approval. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, tabling, action to December 16, .201'4 for Resolution No. 2014 -150, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Building Height, Density, Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2, 2014 and Floor Area Ratio; and, Resolution. No. 2014 -151, Rezoning,and Preliminary. Development Plan r for 7200 France Avenue and directing staff to prepare findings for approval. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Nays: Swenson Motion carried. VI.D. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL REZONING TO PUD -3 ZONING DISTRICT, 6500: FRANCE AVENUE, AURORA. INVESTMENTS,- LLC — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -IS2 AND ORDINANCE. N6. 2014 =24 = =ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request from Aurora Investments, LLC for final review for redevelopment of 6500 France Avenue. In 2012, the Council approved a final development plan rezoning for a medical 'office building. In June 2013, the developer changed the request from a medical office,to :senior housing and assisted living. Mr. Teague outlined the changes since the preliminary plan was approved. It was noted that a traffic study was completed that reported a large reduction in traffic from a medical building use to senior- housing. The staff and Planning Commission recommend approval. The Council noted that Condition I I in Resolution No. 2014 -152 should have included trash pick -up along with deliveries. Proponent Presentation Steve Michals; Mount Development, requested final approval so construction could begin next spring. Edward Farr, Edward Farr Architects, presented the architectural details of the site and noted changes and refinement. Mr. Farr answered questions of the Council, indicating that if ash the trees on the south of the site were ash tree wsTe-ascc, the trees would be replaced or treated (if needed) and that more mature trees could be used if the Council wished. Susan Farr, Ebenezer, answered a question of the Council, indicating that Volunteers of America was donating some its bed allowance. The proponents responded to the Council's questions relating to public use of the skyway, public access to retail facilities, rental rates, sanitary sewer and water lines, planters and sidewalks, window materials, security and access, and parking. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 11:31 p.m. Public Testimony Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council answered a question raised during public testimony, indicating that Edina tax dollars would not be used for the skyway. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014-152, Approving Final Rezoning to Amend the PUD -3, Planned Unit Development — 3 Zoning District and Final. Development Plan for Aurora Investments at 6500 France Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the , site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plan, unless modified by -the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 15, 2014. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council /December 2, 2014 • Grading plan date' stamped October 27, 2014. • Utility plan date stamped.October 27, 2014. • Landscaping. plan date stamped October 27; 2014. • Building elevations date stamped October. 15, 2014. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 36 -1436 through 36 -1462 of "the City Code. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one- half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. The Final-Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36 -1260 of the -City Code. S. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Sustainable design.` The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the Planning Commission staff report. Attempts must be made to meet an energy savings goal of 15% over the current State Energy Code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in .the director of engineering's memo dated November 5, 2014. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 9. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 10. As, part of a Developers Agreement the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 11. Deliveries on the west side of the building shall be limited to 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. as 'shall trash pick -up unless otherwise coordinated with neighboring buildings. 12..Affordable housing units shall be 10% (10 units) of the assisted and independent units. 13. Adoption and. compliance with a PUD Ordinance for the site. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -24, Revising PUD -3, Edina Medical Building into PUD -3, Aurora on France a Senior Housing and Care Suite Facility at 6500 France Avenue. Member Brindle seconded the- motion.- Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT Ronald Rich, 7008 West Shore Drive, stated concern that facts were not being used to either support or not support projects, amendments, etc. and that there was a bias toward development and change. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, suggested that the Council address Hennepin County concerning the light timings on France Avenue. Page ,7 Minutes /Edina CityCouncil /December 2, 2014 0 Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, requested the upcoming Town Hall meeting be recorded for people who could not attend. The Council explained that the Senior Center had been selected based on the positive response from residents and recordings were not possible at that location. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -153 SIDEWALK FACILITIES MAP AMENDMENT — ADOPTED Transportation. Planner Nolan reported that staff prepared the new Sidewalk .Facilities Map based on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets Policy, and input from City staff, officials, and residents: It; was. noted that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment was presented on November `3, 2014, and.a,public, hearing was held. The Council decided to hold four public quadrant meetings to take further written comment including via Speak Up, Edina and tabled the vote until December 2, 2014. Mr. Nolan reviewed the key points from the Plan and summarized public input and key concerns. Emily Boettge, Edina Transportation Commission, commented on the Sidewalk _Facilities Map and expressed the Commission's full support. Engineer ,Millner answered questions of the Council relating to the possibility ,of City removal of sidewalk snow removal. Member, Swenson introduced and moved ,adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -153, Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Revise ,and Replace the Pedestrian Facilities Section of Transportation Chapter 7. Member Sprague seconded the motion. The Council thanked City staff, the Edina Transportation Commission and the Living Streets Working G p'for its hard work in completing this Plan. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. DATE FOR CITY COUNCIL 2015 BOARDS AND COMMISSION ANNUAL MEETING — SELECTED The Council discussed its availability for March 9, 2015, and March 23, 2015., ,Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by. Member Swenson, selecting Monday, March 9, 2015, for the annual meeting with Boards and Commissions. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. SELECT DATE FOR 201S VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION — SELECTED The Council discussed its availability for April 29, 2015, and April 30, 2015. Member Bennett, made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, selecting Wednesday, April 29, 2015 for the annual Volunteer Recognition Reception. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -I SS ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced - and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -155 accepting various grants and donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -22 AMENDING CHAPTER 4 AND 24 CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CONDUCT IN PARKS, STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY — ADOPTED Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 2. 2014 Clerk Mangen reported this was a City Code housekeeping item to allow the Art Fair to cater a beer garden and Tin Fish to apply for a liquor license. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -22, Amending Chapters 4 and 24 of the Edina City Code Concerning Alcoholic Beverages and Conduct in . Parks, Streets, 'Sidewalks, and Publicly Owned Property, as modified to change "Fred Richards" to "Fred Richards Park" in Section 4 (14)a. 1. Member SpSp g seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.F. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 723 AMENDING CHAPTER 18 CONCERNING FALSE ALARMS — ADOPTED Manager Neal indicated the Fire Department was requesting an amendment to the existing ordinance language to limit fee recovery for all II fa ee�' + e ; alarms. If approved, this request would remove the word "fire" from Section 18 -216 and 18 -217. Member Bennett made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -23, Amending Chapter 18 of the Edina City Code Concerning False Alarms. Member. Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES. 1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, OCTOBER 9, 2014 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:40 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 16, 2014. Video Copy of the December 2, 2014, meeting available. Page 9 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 2, 2014 5:32 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Bennett entered the meeting at 5:39 p.m. Staff attending the meeting included: Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Xq A-,0 "" ;°� ' � - ° �'�� ,^ •� ".; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; and Scott Neal, City Manager. Also in attendance was David Beurle, future iQ Partners. VISION EDINA UPDATE — FUTURE IQ PARTNERS David Beurle, future iQ Partners, updated the Council on the Vision Edina process to date. Mr. Beurle presented the initial data showing the various spread on the continuum of how citizens would like to see the Edina of the future. Mr. Beurle noted the data gathered in response to the surveys would be plotted in a data base that allows it to be viewed in many formats. He noted the data will be public, searchable, and show points of consensus and areas of divergence. Mr. Beurle said that to date approximately 466 surveys had been received. Assistant Manager Kurt reviewed the schedule followed to date and outlined the remaining opportunities for citizens to participate in the surveys. The council and staff discussed the preliminary results, and how to gather more input from the citizens. Ms. Kurt explained that future iQ Partners would prepare a draft Vision Edina report and present it at a January 2015 work session. This could serve as a starting point for the development of a VISION document. There would be ample opportunity for Boards and Commissions and all of Edina's citizens to make comments and review the data. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 16, 2014 Debra Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE TOWN HALL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT.EDINA'SENIOR CENTER -DECEMBER 6, 2014 10:05 A.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. in the Fireside Room of the Edina Senior Center. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Sprague was absent. Staff attending the meeting included: Scott Neal, City Manager; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Mayor Hovland welcomed and thanked citizens for attending. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to allow citizens to share their views and concerns with members of the City Council in a less formal setting than during regular meetings. Lonni Skrentner, 7510 Cahill Road, #208B, addressed the article in the Star Tribune giving kudos to the City of Edina regarding the sidewalk policy. Ms. Skrentner, also asked how the council planned to balance future public good with the present demands of businesses and residents' desire to keep things as they currently exist. the i3resent demands ef b1:15inesses and residents with the fUtUFe needs of the ckvi Richard Pfohl, 5716 Deville Drive, expressed concern about who would be responsible for maintenance of the proposed sidewalks. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Avenue, stated that at this time under Edina City Code residents are responsible for shoveling and the repair of city sidewalks. Susan Clark, 5812 West 61 st Street - stated she understood that the Grandview project had been approved public/private and was concerned about how much was deemed public and how much was deemed private. Bruce Kieffer, 5405' Edenmoor Street, stated he went to the Grandview Development meeting last week and most of the people in attendance wanted a community center and green space. Connie Carrino, 4509 Garrision Lane, expressed concern for the amount of garbage trucks going through the neighborhoods. She stated fewer vendors would help with noise pollution. She also stated that since residents pay for street reconstruction it would reduce traffic on the streets therefore less deterioration. John Alt, 7602 York Avenue South, #7311, expressed concern for the amount of advertisement he has received from the Edina Liquor Stores and the cost of that advertising. Heather Beal, 4236 Crocker Avenue, had a follow up question about the liquor stores asking what other advertising sources the city uses to advertise the municipal liquor stores. Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, suggested a tax on liquor -nt res-•mur- n , in Edina to help pay for enterprise facilities. David Frenkel, 4510 Lakeview Drive, asked if the City had ever considered selling the Edina Liquor Stores. Barbara La Valleur, 7621 Edinborough Way, #2110, Chair.of the Public Art Working Group, suggested a Percentage of Art Policy be considered instead of a Percentage of Art Ordinance. She also noted that Edina was too restrictive with their signage ordinance. Page -I Minutes/Edina City Council /December 6, 2014 I Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, stated he was in favor of the Dan Patch Commuter Rail. Harvey Turner, 7315 Glouchester Drive, asked if he could invest money in Edina's road reconstruction and whether it was an, option for other home owners to invest. He also suggested that City Council consider "Villages Within a City ". His example was citizens living in the Southdale area, working in the Southdale area, and shopping in the Southdale area. He wanted everything accessible by sidewalks. He stated he had a goal of Edina becoming the #I First Ring City in the United States.. Troy Paulson;-51-16 Juanita Avenue, was concerned with the Living Streets policy and thought that narrowing of streets was'implemented before residents could give feedback. He wanted to know if there was a threshold of what residents preferred versus dictatorship by City Council regarding narrowing of streets. Heather Beal, 4236 Crocker Avenue, stated her support of "Village Within a City". Ms. Beal stated that t details of Living Streets implementation would be important, and that narrower streets could increase idli by trash hauler trucks. asked ;c garbage r.....leFs ,a..:.,:.... O .....,,ets had been censideFed :n the Leyj Jane Fuegner, 5225 Kellogg Avenue, asked about "The Lid" and whether it was being fostered locally, by Metropolitan Council or another source. Mayor Hovland gave a.general overview of "The Lid" concept. Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Blvd, asked why residents.were assessed for streets when everyone used them. =uegner, 5225 Kelly Avenue, asked about the use of speed bumps. Ms. Janovy and Ms. nded this would not slow traffic and could hurt people with back and neck issues Carol Carmichiel, 6112 Brookview Avenue, expressed concern about outdoor lighting. She explained she lived next to a resident that has a sports court with bright lighting and wanted to know how the lighting ordinance was enforced. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Avenue, asked for an update on Weber Woods and noted she would like to keep it as natural as possible. Ms. Janovy also asked what the next steps were in the process. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, expressed concern regarding storm water must gevtough with the builders regarding storm water management. h should handle storm water on its own property, not send it to neighbors management. She stated the s. Grotz stated new developr Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, noted his concern for the planning process and asked the council members to sit down individually and talk about changes to the planning process for the City of Edina. Bob Stewart,., 6,147 Arctic Way, reminded citizens in attendance to fill out the Vision Edina online survey. Connie Carrino, 4509 Garrison Lane, applauded the Planning Department and City Council for their work. le �- namDerlaln, /vv-+ t5risEoi [5ouievaras asKea now seriously the l-ity 1 -ounci Dan Petrowski, 7204 Oaklawn Avenue, stated he had road traffic concerns with all the new building construction on France Avenue. Colleen Wolfe, 4408 Gilford Drive, urged the City Council to slow down with the big changes in the city. Her concern today was with Fred Richards Golf Course and 7200 France. Ms. Wolfe stated residents need to be engaged with the processes not pushed out of the process. Page 2 Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 12:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes /Edina City Council /December 6. 2014 Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 16, 2014 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 3 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/412014 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 621 12/4/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 64.80 358393 1844267 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 34.00 358582 1845194 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 98.80 622 1214/2014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 2,647.50 ERF GRANT APPLICATION 358720 23271309.02 -1 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,647.50 623 12/4/2014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,413.05 358670 45612500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,025.58 358398 45703300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 643.30 358395 45703500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 53.55 358399 45815000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING, - 74.65 356396 45815100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,209.85 356669 45815300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 90.00 358397 45815400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 67.50 358781 45872100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 693.30 358779 45672200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 272.05 358784 45872300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 326.20 358780 45881000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 452.10 358402 6504700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 172.35 358401 91155400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 14.49 358782 91155700 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 308.94 358400 91155800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 180.32 358783 91173900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,997.23 624 1214/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 12.49- RETURN 00003102 358466 CP- WO- 974564 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.29- RETURN 358462 CP- WO- 974567 -1 1490.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES. PUBLIC HEALTH 20.20 STAMP REPLACEMENT PADS 358467 IN -31593 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.29 CALENDAR 00003101 358465 OE- 376059 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 338.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358463 0E- 376083 -1 5820.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 74.45 BIRTHDAY STAMP 00002103 358541 WO- 970584 -1 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 99.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358540 WO- 973440 -1 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 152.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003109 358464 WO- 974564 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 171.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003109 358464 WO- 974564 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.29 CALENDAR 00003101 358460 WD-974567-1 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 29.38 DESK PADS 00003103 358461 WO- 974882 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL E 100.79 HEATER 00003103 358461 WO- 974882 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT 'ORAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EwovA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 624 12/412014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 20.50 HAND SANITIZER 358468 WO- 975362 -2 1550.6406 95.23 THERMAL ROLLS, SCISSORS 00002124 358542 WO- 975420 -1 5720.6406 66.66 PAPER 00002124 358543 WO- 975422 -1 5710.6513 18.84 REFILL INK FOR STAMPS 358629 WO- 975854 -1 1180.6406 22.92 SHEET PROTECTORS 358630 WO- 975990 -1 1550.6406 1,204.00 625 121412014 122688 BMKSOLUTIONS, 42.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358470 102862 1552.6406 19.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358469 102874 1552.6406 62.29 626 12/4/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 12,132.50 TRUNK SEWER REHAB 358724 0172121 03485.1705.21 12,132.50 627 12/412014 100869 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 379.46 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005790 358727 466446 1553.6180 475.10 MIRROR 00005850 358725 911626X1 1553.6530 39.00 DAMPER ASSEMBLY, BUSHINGS 00006872'' 358726 912655 1553.6530 893.56 628 12/412014 100664 -BRAUN INTERTEC 1,350.00 INSPECTIONS/TESTING 358728 B015202 47090.6710 1,350.00 629 1214/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 48.00 358405 779677 5842.5515 844.65 358404 779678 5842.5514 811.95 358788 779680 5822.5514 152.00 358789 779681 5822.5514 .: '95.30 358586 779682 5862.5515 1,878.50 358587 779683 5862.5514 3,830.40 630 1214/2014 121076 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 151.62 TOILET RENTAL 358646 83754 5422.6182 ' 26.27 TOILET RENTAL 358645 83971 5422.6182 177.89 Subledger. Account Description Continued... GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES _ GENERALSUPPLIES 12/2i� X0:45:20 Page- 2 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ELECTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONSULTING INSPECTION TRUNK SS LINING - CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA P.K SHELTER & TURF COST OF, GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OPGOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS -SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF -GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST.SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/412014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 631 12/4/2014 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP Continued... 1,005.09 358811 185102 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,747.28 358600 185444 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,752.37 - 632 12/4 @014 102660 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1,043.00 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 358748 16328 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,043.00 " 633 12/412014 101483 MENARDS 354.70, LUMBER 00001341 ._ 358830 69666 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105.71 PAINT, SUPPLIES 00006364 358651 72541 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 460.41 634 1214/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 57.50 BUSINESS CARDS 358505 83901 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.50 636 12/412014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 776.14 VEHCILE REPAIRS 358767 662875 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 776.14 - 636 12/4/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY - 49.06. COUPLING 00006274 358665 1546884 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 388.87 FILTERS, O- RINGS, ELEMENT 00005854 358768 5099950 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.63 PLUG. 00005855 358769 5100946 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 491.56 637 12/4/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA 118.75 358441 0112129 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,063.00 358442 0112168 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 423.00 358700 0112169 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,604.75 638 121412014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 528.25 358444 377626 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 676.40 358443 377813 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 50TH ST SELLING 628.25 358702 377926 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 120.00 358445 377984 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 918.85 358446 378408 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,832.05 358821 378409 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/k. . )0:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 638 12/4/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 1,024.00 358701 378616 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,727.80 - 389031 121412014 126198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 164.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358715 112614 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARKADMIN. GENERAL 164.64 389032 12/4/2014 129468 ACME TOOLS 90:00 IMPACT DRIVER 00005811 358716 3029041 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.00 389033 12/412014 132836 ADCOCK, MARIAN 7.74 ART WORK SOLD 358363 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.74 389034 12/412014 131688 ADLER, LAURA 393.42 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 358717 112414 1263.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS ENVIRONMENT 393.42 389036 1214/2014 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 94.89 ALARM MONITORING 358457 530840437 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 94.89 389036 12/412014 136219 ALGER, DR. DEAN 123.50 ART WORK SOLD 358364 112414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 123.50 _ • 389037 1214/2014 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 4.88 ART WORK SOLD 358365 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.88 389038 12/4/2014 119976 AP LAWN 3,973.00. . FALL CLEANUP 00002323 358718 CTLKPK -1114 5761.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,973.00 389039 12/4/2014 102172 APPERTS F.00DSERVICE.. 614.14 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358538 411210676 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 363.44 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358537 411250129 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 977.58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 358721 135742 5520.5510 CITY OF EDINA ARENA CONCESSIONS 100.10 358722 157121 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD Council Check Register by GL 272.15 358785 179686 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 358673 179687 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20.00 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 179688 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No , Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389040. 1214/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 618.00 358394 3006286 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 418.00 358583 3006704. 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,036.00 389041 121412014 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 472.19 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 358719 10140866 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 472.19 389042 12/4/2014 102120 ATOL, ROBERT 130.50 SAFETY FOOTWEAR 358628 112414 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 130.50 389043 1214/2014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 71.88 BATTERIES .00003108 358458, 018- 356310 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.88 389044 12/412014 125227 BERGUM, MOLLY 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 358366 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD - 19.50 389045 1214/2014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. - 432.00 PIZZA 358539 D281N2873 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 432.00 389046 12/4/2014 126139 BERNICK'S 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 5 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT.OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE 6 GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 85.80 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358721 135742 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 100.10 358722 157121 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 272.15 358785 179686 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 467.95 358673 179687 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20.00 358671. 179688 5862.5515.- . COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 692.25 358672 - 179689 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,636.25 389047 12/4/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 150.95 COFFEE 358459 1212923 1552,6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 150.95 389048 1214/2014 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL- OCT 2014 358825 100114 -2 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 386.00 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH STREET RUBBISH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/k:.. 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389048 121412014 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES Continued... 389049 12/4/2014 120205 BLUE STAR POWER SYSTEMS INC. 174.10 V BELTS 00005694 358723 14 -17298 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 174.10 389060 12/412014. 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 12.39 HAND WIPES 00003883 358544 81615432 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 12.39 389061 12/412014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,167.00 358403 123360 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 407.50 358786 123478 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,574.50 389062 121412014 100663 - BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - 15.74 PETTY CASH 358631 112514 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 100.00 PETTY CASH 358631 112514 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 115.74 389053 12/4/2014 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 285.00 DMT CERTIFICATION COURSE 358496 5396 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 285.00 389064 121412014 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 358367 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.25 389066 121412014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 66.60 358585 00010831 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 780.80 358787 457549 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,645.00 358584 457550 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,492.40 389066 12/4/2014 - 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 42.90 ART WORK SOLD '358368 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.90 389067 12/412014 129923 CAWLEY 38.19 NAME BADGES 358729 V259335 - 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 38.19 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount 389057 12/412014 389058 1214/2014 136.47 73.13 2,025.17 2,630.17 4,081.46 27.08 1,132.51 46.84 1,643.13 11,795.96 Supplier / Explanation 129923 CAWLEY 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 10089900 -4 10437426 -9 5546504 -1 5563827 -4 5591458-4 5596524 -8 8034001 -1 9546705 -6 9724639 -1 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/412014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 358733 10089900 -11/14 1646.6186 358826 10437426 -11/14 5553.6186 358731 5546504 -11/14 1470.6186 358471 5563827 -11/14 5210.6186 358732 5591458 -11/14 1551.6186 358730 5596524 -11/14 5430.6186 358473 8034001 -11/14 1552.6186 358545 9546705 -11/14 5913.6186 358472 9724639 -11/14 5511.6186 Subledger Account Description Continued... HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 7 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM CITY HALL GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 389069 1214/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 57.46 952 920 -1586 358475 1586 -11114 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 69.59 952 922 -2444 358474 2444 -11/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.46 952920 -8632 358546 8632 -11/14 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 40.78 952 922 -9246 358632 9246 -11/14 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 130.29 952 920.9996 358827 9996 -11/14 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 355.58 389060 12/4/2014 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 454.88 00105263 - 0335037016 358633 335037016 -11/14 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 537.76 00113607- 0342163045 358476 342163045 -11/14 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER _- FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 992.64 389061 121412014 120433 COMCAST 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 358477 373022 -11/14 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.65 8772 10 614 0496856 358634 496856 -11/14 .5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 128.42 389062 12/4/2014 131697 COMMERCIAL DOOR SYSTEMS INC. 2,896.31 PAMELA PARK SHELTER 358622 0108988 -IN 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 2,896.31 389063 12/4/2014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 841.60 BIRTHDAY WATER BOTTLES 358547 32981 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 841.60 389064. 12/4/2014 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389064 1214/2014 - 124336 CUMELLA, COLLETTE Continued... 20.80 ART WORK SOLD 358369 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 20.80 389066 121412014 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 19.78 MICRO BELT 00001143 358734 164553 1641.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 19.78 389066 12/4/2014 136243 CUSHMAN, MADELINE 16.20 ART CLASS REFUND 358707 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 16.20 389067 121412014 136228 DAMMAN, LAUREN 18.00 ART CLASS REFUND 358711 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 18.00 - 389068 12/412014 118376 DEPAUL LETTERING " 263.50 POLO SHIRTS / LOGOS 358478 10403 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 263.50 389069 121412014 121161 DEX MEDIA 21.40 PHONE LISTING 358479 111614 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 21.40 PHONE LISTING 358479 111614 5841.6188 TELEPHONE ' 21.40 PHONE LISTING 358479 111614 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 64.20 389070 1214/2014 102831 ' DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 556.75 110311893 358635 110311893- 10/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 26.50 358735 650487671 -11/14 5510.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 583.25 389071 12/412014 117646 EBBERT, PATRICIA 16.20 ART CLASS REFUND 358709 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 16.20 389072 121412014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 320.00 SIDEWALKS AD . 358736 162354 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 320.00 389073 121412014 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 7.69 CONNECTOR 00001050 358480 11392400 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1212/2014 10:45:20 Page - 8 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES M01MNG ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GOLF ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES TRANSPORTATION CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check. Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389073 12/4/2014 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. Continued... 7.69 389074 1214/2014 134601 EMMONS & OLMER RESOURCES INC. 4,948.25 STREET SWEEPING MGMT PLAN 358737 01169 - 0001 -5 04414.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 4,948.25 389076 121412014 100880 EXECUTIVE OFFICE CONCEPTS LTD 491.50 TAPES FOR BACKUPS 358548 160495 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 491.50 389076 12/4/2014 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 67.00 358790 259 -2067 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 67.00' 389077 1214/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 198.78 SPLASH DRUMS 358739 1- 4578844 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 18.45 LAMPS 358738, 69- 158659 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 76.88 TENSIONER, IDLER 358481 69- 159072 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.44 BATTERIES 358482 I- ZO2836 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 408.55 389078 1214/2014, 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 557.66 CS FITTINGS 00001082 358549 0119103 -1 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 557.66 389079 12/412014 136234 FIELD TRAINING SOLUTIONS 590.00 FTO BASIC COURSES 358636 8271 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 590.00 389080 1214/2014 135216 FISHMAN, CINDY 385.00 ART CLASS REFUND 358483 REFUND, 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 385.00 389081 1214/2014 108664 FLANDERS, SUSAN 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 358370 112514 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 16.25 389082 12/4/2014 130699 FLEETPRIDE 13.11 CHROME NUT COVERS 00005858 358484 64849493 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 13.11 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 9 Business Unit STREET SWEEPING MANAGEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS " VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 - Check # Date Amount '-Supplier/ Explanation 389082 121412014 Council Check Register by GL 130699 FLEETPRIDE i 389083 12/4/2014 ART CENTER REVENUES 101476 FOOTJOY 461555 1214/2014 - 12/4/2014 31.50 MERCHANDISE PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 129.90 SHOES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.06- CREDIT 358637 5923110 5440.5511 74.34 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 389084 .121412014. COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 136229 FORBES, SHEILA 358639 6523349 5440.5511 18.00 ART CLASS REFUND 00002119 358555 18.00 5720.6406 389086 1214/2014 OPERATIONS 126726 FORTNER, NOLA 4.88 ART WORK SOLD 4.88 389086 1214/2014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP RAGS 15.00 30.00 389087 12/412014 101662 GCSAA 365.00 MEMBERSHIP -TOM SWENSON 365.00 889088 1214/2014 133268 GORDON, KIM i 6.83 ARTWORK SOLD , 6.83 389089 12/4/2014 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 365.00 . NEW SQUAD GRAPHICS DESIGN 365.00 - 389090 12/412014 101103 GRAINGER 105.12 FILTERS 70.22 FILTERS 8.87 FLASHLIGHT 16.15 CABLE TIES 21.80 SLIDE LATCHES 91.03 CORDLESS VACUUM 313.19 358712 CITY OF EDINA 5101.4607 120- 0:45:20 ART CENTER REVENUES Council Check Register by GL 111714 Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary ART CENTER REVENUES 358642 461555 1214/2014 - 12/4/2014 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS Continued... 358551 358637 5923110 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 358638 5926376 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 358639 6523349 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 358712 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 358371 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 358640 1006575294 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 358641 1006598030 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 358642 461555 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 358372 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 358485 97226 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 00002109 358550 9587684342 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 00002110 358553 9588259326 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 00002110 358552 9588259334 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 00002110 358551 9588259342 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 00002115 358554 9593634596 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 00002119 358555 9594797525 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS - R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council. Check Register by GL - Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary " 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No, Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389090 121412014 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 389091 121412014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 571.75 358407 174398 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ' 1,084.50 358406 174406 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 3,630.75 358408 174596 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,084.50 358792 174598 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 98.25. 358791 174647 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 31141.75 358674 174650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE 9,611.50 389092 12/4/2014 132968 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES INC. 2,500.00 ED126805 ESCROW REFUND 358740 5602 DALRYMPLE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT RD 2,500.00 389093 12/4/2014 122746 GREEN, MICHELE 36.40 ARTWORK SOLD 358373 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 36.40 389094 12/412014 135220 GREIMAN, LOIS , 85.44 'ART WORK SOLD 358374 111714 - 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 85.44 389096 1214/2014 100166 GRITTON, KAY 28.60 ART WORK SOLD 358375 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 28.60 389096 1214/2014 136218 HAHN, MELANIE 90.00, ART CLASS REFUND 358486 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 90.00 389097 121412014 103726 HAMER, STEVE 28.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358487 SUSA 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 28.00 389098 1214/2014 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN 28.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358488 SUSA '5919.61104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 28.00 389099 12/4/2014 127876 HARMON AUTO GLASS 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page'- 11 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING INSPECTIONS ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES TRAINING TRAINING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2,541.30 CITY OF EUNA 100799 HEDBERG SUPPLY 389106 12/4/2014 1,035.50, TRAP ROCK 00006270 358643 402276 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register by GL 1,035.50 389103 1214/2014 ART CLASS REFUND 136240 HEDLUND, DOUGLAS Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 62.77 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358742 6028 ERIN TERR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 16.20 62.77 12/4/2014 — 12/412014 Check #i Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389099 121412014 PCS FOR BRAEMAR FIELD 00604422 127876 HARMON AUTO GLASS 55094110 Continued... CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,878.00 182.71 GLASS 00005868 358489 100- 116019 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - 182.71 389100 12/412014 FLOOR CARE.PRODUCTS 00002114. 122160 HAUER; NORM - 601388302 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 118.56 90.00 CARICATURE SERVICES 358741' GRAND OPENING 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 208.34 90.00 358561 601396029 5720.6406 389101! 12/412014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 12/2/x. 0:45:20 Page- 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 2,541.30 CHEMICALS 00001250 358556 3667647 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT . 2,541.30 389102 12/4/2014 100799 HEDBERG SUPPLY 389106 12/4/2014 1,035.50, TRAP ROCK 00006270 358643 402276 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,035.50 389103 1214/2014 ART CLASS REFUND 136240 HEDLUND, DOUGLAS 112614 62.77 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 358742 6028 ERIN TERR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 16.20 62.77 389104 12/412014 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 389107 1214/2014, 41.26 UNIFORM PURCHASE 358490 112514 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 41.26 389106 1214/2014 PCS FOR BRAEMAR FIELD 00604422 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER GOLF DOME PROGRAM UTILITY BALANCE.SHEET BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,272.00 RADIO FLEET FEE 358828 1000051489 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,796.70 -.RADIO FLEET FEE 358829 1000051490 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,068.70 389106 12/4/2014 136241 HENNINGSGAARD,.ELAINE 16:20 ART CLASS REFUND 358710 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 16.20 389107 1214/2014, 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1,878.00 PCS FOR BRAEMAR FIELD 00604422 358557 55094110 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,878.00 - 389108 121412014 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 251.63 FLOOR CARE.PRODUCTS 00002114. 358560 - 601388302 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 118.56 HAIR & BODY SOAP 00002117 358558 601388303 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 208.34 SANITIZER 00002126 358561 601396029 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council,Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389108 12/4/2014 103763 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS Continued... 66.62 VACUUM PARTS 00002113 358558 700159905 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 645.15 389109 12/412014 128216 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 339,327.16 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 356533 112014 01259.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN 339,327.16 389110 12/4/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 812.50 358797 734606 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,257.00 358676 734810 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 56.00 358675 734811 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 87.00 358796 734824 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 54.00 358795 734825 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 833.00 358793 735000 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 40.00 358794 735081 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,139.50 389111 12/4/2014 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 6.49 LUMBER 358562 9011172 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 6.49 389112 12/4/2014 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY ?+ 46.99 TEST KIT SUPPLIES 00002108 358563 141105018 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 46.99 389113 12/412014 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 20.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 358492 112114 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL -30.06 TRAINING EXPENSES 358492 112114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.39 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 358491 112514 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.45 389114 1214/2014 100812 IAAO 175.00 ADRIENNE LEDERMANN 358644 DUES (4) 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 175.00 NATHAN STULC 358644 DUES (4) 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 175.00 SHELAGH STOERZINGER 358644 DUES (4) 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 175.00 BEVERLY MOOS 358644 DUES (4) 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 700.00 389116 12/412014 101146 IMPACT TELECOM ' 311.22 358493 608307639 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 'CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF F -' -..A Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 121412014 - 12/4/2014 -Check # Date Amount .' Supplier/ Explanation PO #. Doc No Inv No Account No 389116 12/4/2014 - " 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 311.22 389116 12/412014 132871 INGLAS LLP 8,075.00 PAMELA PARK SHELTER 358623 12048C 47090.6710 8,075.00 389117 12/412014 100830 JERRY S PRINTING 68.00 POOL & TRACK PASSES 358564 66792 5710.6575 68.00 PARK MEMBERSHIP FORMS 358565 66793 5710.6575 136.00 389118 1214/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN • 5,670.60 358409 2266720 5822.5514 6,199.80 358677 2286755 5862.5514 77.60 358678 2286756 5862.5515 990.20 358799 2286757 5822.5514 17.55 358798 2286758 5822.5515 4,652.46 358800 2286761 5842.5514 179.35 358801 2286762 5842.5515 141.00 358802 2286764 5842.5514. 60.00- 358647 2296398 5421.5514 17,868.56 ' 389119 12/412014 124104 JOHN DEERE'LANDSCAPES INC. 108.91 SALT 00006273 358648 70228690 5420.6406 ,.. 108.91 389120 121412014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. .29 358411 5030886 5842.5512 3,412.50 358419 5030887 5822.5513 1,121.31 358421 5030891 5822.5513 29 358422 5030896 5862.5512 .29 358808 5030897 5842.5512 590.27 358420 5030899 5822.5513 3,726.04 358412 5030904 5842.5512 1,369.84 358410 5030906 5842.5512 _ 74.04 358809 5030907 5842.5512 3,473.04 358423 5030916 5862.5512 14.98 358805 5033380 5822.5512 .29 358418 5033381 5862.5512 Subledger Account Description Continued... 1212i�. 10'.45:20 Page - 14 Busine6s'Unit EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF PRINTING PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD'BEER GENERALSUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST -OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH-ST-SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date ; Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 389120 12/4/2014 5822.5512 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 140.64 5862.5513, 358803 5033382 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 93.66 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 358806 5033383 5862.5515 1,772.30 5862.5513 358807 5033384 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,553.46 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 358804 5033385 5842.5512 1.16 5842.5512 358591 5033386 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,290.52 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 358417 5033389 5842.5513 1,575.09 - 358588 5033390 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,017.58 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 358413 5033391 5842.5513 125.64 5842.5513 358414 5033392 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,542.31 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 358590 5033393 5842.5513 61.91 5842.5512 358415 5033394 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,782.45 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 358589 5033395 103.94 358416 5033396 1.74 358687 5035159 .87 358681 5035160 2,051.93 358679 5035162 4,871.57 358682 5035163 1,289.87 358686 5035164 919.18 358680 5035165 1,705.01 358683 5035166 3,275.84 358684 5035167 21.07- 358810 503540 4.00- 358593 503541 114.32- 358596 503542 53.56- 358595 503544 6.90- 358592 503545 38.46- 358597 503546 77.32 358685 5035473 59.01- 358594 503642 13.32- 358425 504333 12.41- 358599 504334 22.12- 358598 504335 20.00- 358424 504338 43,672.00 389121 121412014 103664 JOHNSON, DENISE 91.00 ART WORK SOLD 358376 111714 91.00 389122, 12/412014 118814 JOHNSON, LINNEA Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD Business Unit . 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF i= .:...A Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description . 389122 12/4/2014 118814 JOHNSON, LINNEA Continued... 62.40 ART WORK SOLD 358377 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 62.40 389123 12/4/2014 136242 JUBLAND, JANICE 16.20 ART CLASS REFUND 358708 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 16.20 389124 121412014 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 172.62 LOCKS/KEYS 00001127 358743 S1015046 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 172.62 389126 12/4/2014 130215 KUEHL, RHONDA 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 358378 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD • 13.00 389126 1214/2014 100364 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 876.39 CLAY 00009356 358744 219832 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 876.39 389127 12/4/2014 102403 LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE LLC 120.00 FABRIC 00006464 358649 6837 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 120.00 3891281.-12/4/2014 136226 LAMON, MJ 68.60 358566 STAMPS 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES .68.60 i, 389129 12/4/2014 136227 LANO EQUIPMENT- LORETTO 167.57 V BELTS 00002122 358567 03= 191123 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 167.57 389130 121412014 134967 LEACH LAW OFFICE 434.00 OCT 2014-BAL DUE 358494 FEES 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 434.00, 389131 121412014 106726 LINDMAN, DAVID 1,464.47 RAID STORAGE, HARD DRIVES 358495 112414 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,464.47 389132 1214/2014.- 100868 LOGIS 12/2: 0:45:20 Page- 16 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER. REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES " ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS LEGAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389132 12/4/2014 100868 LOGIS Continued... 446.98 ' BRAEMAR FIELD IT WORK 356650 39243 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 17 Business Unit SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 446.98 - 389133 12/412014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 257.38 HOOD LATCH, AIR COMPRESSOR 00005866 358745 2150212 1553.6530 257.38 389134 12/4/2014 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 280.00 HOSTING FEES 358746 201 1130.6103 280.00 389136 121412014 120924 MASTER MECHANICAL INC. 2,010.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001103 358747 41117 5921.6180 2,010.00 389136 12/412014 133904 - MEDIAWORKS 1,500.00 CUB FOODS ADS 358568 81221 5710.6122 1,500.00 389137 1214/2014 101987 MENARDS 222.70 WIRE, TAPE; TOOLS 00002119 358569 56489 5720.6406 222.70 389138 12/412014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 52.82 LAMPASSEMBLY 00005653 358749 491558 1553.6530 467.99 LAMPASSEMBLY 00005873 358750 491571 1553.6530 520.81 389139 12/4/2014 134038 MIDWEST CIVIL CONSTRUCT_ ORS LLC 37,885.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 358534 112014 01417.1705.30 37,885.65 389140 12/412014 102682 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 30.00 BOILER LICENSE 358751 ABR01065521 1553.6260 10.00 PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSE 358754 ABR01067021 1553.6260 10.00 PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSE 358752 ABR01067351 1553.6260 40.00 PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSES 358755 ABR01077321 1470.6260 70.00 PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSES 358756 ABR01077981 1470.6260 10.00 PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSE 358753 ABR01078351 1553.6260 170.00 REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ADVERTISING OTHER 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 17 Business Unit SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389140 12/412014 '_ 102682 MINN DEPT OF LABOR.& INDUSTRY Continued... 389141 1214/2014 133191 MINNESOTA MASTER RENOVATIONS INC. 2,500.00 ED124876 ESCROW REFUND 358757 5521 GROVE ST 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 389142, 12/4/2014 100908 MINNESOTA,WANNER CO.. 16.00 BAND CLAMPS 00001134 358758 0107187 -IN 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.00 389143 121412014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 49.00 GRAND OPENING POSTERS 358759 16662 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.00. BANNERS FOR REOPENING 358497 16665 5822.6575 PRINTING 98.00 389144 12/412014 132597 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 144.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358570 2134 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 144.00 389145 12/4/2014 124121 MULLANEY, MARLA 33.74- ART WORK SOLD 358379 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 33.74 389146 1214/2014 132691 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 6,775.00 ELECTRICAL OUTLETS/LIGHTS 00006354 358652 112028 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6,775.00 389147 12/412014 123964 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 299.00 ART CENTER ADS 358498 604298 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 299.00 389148 12/412014 131649 NEOPOST GREAT PLAINS 288.00 POSTAGE MACHINE CARTRIDGES 358760 GPAR30132 1550.6235 POSTAGE 288.00 389149 12/412014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 144.00 358426 95499 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 144.00 389150 12/4/2014 127709 NORCOSTCO,INC. 165.00 THEATER CURTAIN REPAIRS 358571 158060 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 18 Business Unit INSPECTIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 50TH ST SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 85.46 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 389164 12/4/2014 130333 UMALLEY,MARYANNE Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 16.25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 16.25 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389160 12/412014 31.30 127709 NORCOSTCO INC. 358761 2891 Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES 165.00 389151 12/412014 108612 NORTHERN GREEN EXPO 375.00 CONTINUING EDUCATION 358653 REGISTRATION 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 375.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 358535 120514 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 389162 12/412014 75,569.74 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 358535 120514 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 64.53 SCREW PINS 00001128 -358572 550474 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 64.53 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 358535 120514 05538:1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 389163 12/4/2014 22,115.63 102266 OLSON, TIM 358535 120514 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 85.46 TRAINING EXPENSES 358499 112114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNITY GARDEN WARDEN AVE HAWKES NHOOD RECON WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON OLINGER BLVD M &O ART CENTER REVENUES 85.46 389164 12/4/2014 130333 UMALLEY,MARYANNE 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 358380 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 16.25 389165 1214/2014 135245 ONE WORLD LANDSCAPE AND SUPPLY 31.30 ROTOTILLING AT GARDENS 358761 2891 1610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.30 389166 12/4/2014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 1,204.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 358535 120514 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 3,057.99 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 358535 120514 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 75,569.74 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 358535 120514 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 22,182.09- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 358535. 120514 03480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 52,594.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 358535 120514 05538:1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 22,115.63 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.7 358535 120514 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 176,724.48 389167 1214/2014 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 49,181.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 358536 112614 01423.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 49,181.89 389158 1214/2014 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 38.03 ARTWORK SOLD 358381 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 38.03 389169 12/4/2014 102440 PASS, GRACE ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNITY GARDEN WARDEN AVE HAWKES NHOOD RECON WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON OLINGER BLVD M &O ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice &Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389169 12/4/2014 102440 - PASS, GRACE. Continued... 32.50 ARTWORK SOLD 358382 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 358427 32.50 5822:5513 389160 12/4/2014 8475880 -IN 100347 PAUSTIS.WINE COMPANY 358429 1,328.02 5862.5515 358688 1,549.05 5842.5513 358812 36.25 5822.5513 5822.5513 1,947.32 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 872.71 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 5,733:35 VERNON SELLING 389161 12/412014 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 121040 PC ADVENTURES INC. 5822.5513 79.00 VIDEO REPAIR 5862.5513 79.00 VERNON SELLING 389162 121412014 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 637.50 IT CONSULTING 637.50 389163 1214/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 198.40 198.40 389164 12/412014 119936 PET CROSSING 559.83 DIESEL K9 EXAM 559.83 389166 121412014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 390.74 544.06 725.92 1.74 3,312.76 465.18 65.16 108.66 209.93 4,992.97 1,924.95 122.32 358427 8475185 -IN, 5822:5513 358428 8475880 -IN 5862.5513 358429 8475886 -IN 5862.5515 358688 8476210 -IN 5842.5513 358812 8476214 -IN 5822.5513 358501 9826 5841.6180 358654 112214011 1554.6103 358573 49425096 358502 135005 358431 2701330 358689 2701332 358430- 2701333 358432 2701334 358433 2701339 358814 2702910 358813 2702911 358602 2702912 358816 2702913 358815 2702914 358603 2702915 358604 2702916 12/2/k,;. , 10:45:20 Page - 20 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING, COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNONSELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 - Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 .. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389166 12/4/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 1,230.65' 358434 2702917 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 280.92 358601 2702918 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 868.31 358692 2704153 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,575.47 358691 2704154 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 958.16 358690 2704155 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.00- 358605 3533405 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17,769.90 389166 ' 12/412014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 409.60' 358606 22801 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 249.00 358693 22915 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 658.60 389167 1214/2014 133460 PITSCHKA, CHARLES 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 358383 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 389168 12/4/2014 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 358574 326937 5720.6620. TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 389169 12/4/2014 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 28.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358503 SUSA 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 28.00 389170 12/4/2014 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 912.95 PLAYERS CARDS 358762 1361 5410.6575. PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 912.95 389171 12/4/2014 136224 PROS OF THE ROPE 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/11/14 358500 112514 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 389172 121412014 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 71.35 PUMP HANDLE 00006271 358656 22588- 23936SO 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 71.35 389173 1214/2014 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING 432,905.50 PAMELA PARK SHELTER 358624 14045.2 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF e 432,905.50 R55CKR2 LOWS101 CITY OFEUiNA 12/2/k'.,10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 . Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No' Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389173 1214/2014 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING Continued..: 389174 1214/2014 131061 RAINDROP IRRIGATION SERVICES LLC 215.00 BLOWOUT SPRINKLER SYSTEM . 358575 506 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 215.00 389176 12/412014 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 ED128224 ESCROW REFUND 358763 5517 MIRROR 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS LAKES OR 2,500.00 389176 121412014 108669 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12 /14/14 358504 112514 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 38.9177 12/4/2014 123767 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 85D.00 DASHERBOARD AD SALES 358831 1014151 -8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 850.00 389178 1214/2014 126178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 130,086.62 PAMELA PARK SHELTER 358625 4520013701 47096.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF ' 130,086.62 389179 12/4/2014 136216 ROCKIN' HOLLYWOODS, THE 650.00 PERFORMANCE FEE 358506 MUSIC IN EDINA 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA - 650.00 389180 121412014 136230 ROOFS, JEANNINE 18.00 ART CLASS REFUND 358713 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION -ART CENTER REVENUES 18.00 389181. 1214/2014 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 169.65- BRAKE CLEANER 358764 65238173 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 169.65 389182 12/4/2014 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 99.99 0402373069350 358507 112014 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 99.99 389183 121412014 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE- 40.30 ARTWORK SOLD 358385 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 tOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier ! Explanation Poi Doc.No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389183 121412014 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE Continued... 40.30 389184 121412014 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 30.55 ART WORK SOLD 358384 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 30.55 - 389186 121412014 127490 SCULLY, PAT 8.13 ART WORK SOLD 358386 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 8.13 389186 12/4/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 55.25. ART WORK SOLD 358387 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 55.25 389187 12/412014 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 190.06 MILEAGE REMIBURSEMENT 358576 112414 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 190.06 389188 1214/2014 102841 SHUTTERS'N SHADES 182.99, SHUTTER REPAIRS 358657 SNS22094 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 182.99 389189 12/4/2014 127519 SIEGEL, LISA • 14.92 ART WORK SOLD 358388 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 14.92 389190 1214/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 DASHERBOARD 358509 8452 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 185.00 -DASHERBOARD 358508 8514 551D.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' 370.00 389191 1214/2014 132195 SMALL LOT MN 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page- 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE RANGE ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION 341.00 358435 1350 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 341.00 389192 121412014 136231 SMITH, BARB 18.00 ,ART CLASS REFUND, 358714 112614 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 18.00 389193 12/4/2014 136225 SORENSON, BENJAMIN ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOViS101 342.00- CITY OF EDINA 358609 0013176 5842.5513 Council Check Register by GL ^. YORK SELLING 44.00- Council Check Register by Invoice & Summery 358608 0013177 5842.5513 12/412014 - 12/4/2014 YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389193 121412014 136226' SORENSON, BENJAMIN COST OF GOODS, SOLD LIQUOR Continued... 90.00 EMT RECERTIFICATION 358577 TEST FEE 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS r 90.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 389194 121412014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 358438 12/212014 10:45:20 Page - 24 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 342.00- 358609 0013176 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 44.00- 358608 0013177 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,192.31 358695 1226125 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS, SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,418.79 358437 1226127 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12,488.00 358438 1226128 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 721.25 358440 1227597 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,331.25 358436 1228163 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,806.52 358439 1228164 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .75 358817 1228905 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 472.90 358694 1228906 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,292.65 358818 1228907 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.50 358696 1228908 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,077.20 358607 1228909 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,010.48 358697 1228910 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 38,427.60 389196 12/4/2014 110977 SOW, ADAMA 94.25 ARTWORK SOLD 358389 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES -. 94.25 - 389196 121412014 136244 SPATES, ZACHARY `400.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 358765 112614 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 400.00 - 389197 121412014 131966 SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES 2,900.00' 'SOIL FOR VETERANS MEMORIAL 00002325 358766 16583 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 2,900.00 389198 1214/2014 102698 - SPOONER, ANNE 52.00 -ART WORK SOLD 358390 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 52.00 389199 121412014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 289.75 358820 4207 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 373.75 358819 4208 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 663.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 TECH FEES 358660 30038135 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 95.00- CREDIT 358661 30224949 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,379.40- CREDIT 358662 Council Check Registei by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,123.85- CREDIT 358663 30241177 12/4/2014 — 12/4/2014 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389199 12/4/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 389200 12/4/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 129409 STEEN, BARB 149.10 18.20 ART WORK SOLD 358391 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD VERNON SELLING 1,492.35 18.20 358698 862231 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 389201 12/412014 101015 STREICHERS 389207 12/412014 1,135.00 BALL VEST, CARRIER, PLATE 358832 11112573 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 47.15 1,070.00 BALL VEST, CARRIER 358833 11113301 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.15 2,205.00 389202 121412014 103973 ULINE 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 1,153.57 'FUNGICIDE 358658 10708 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1,153.57%. 389203 12/4/2014 122611 SWANK-MOTION PICTURES INC. 150.00 MOVIE RENTAL 358578 DB1994514 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC 20THER 150.00 389204 12/412014 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 50.00 BEER LINE SERVICE 358664 073420 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 ' 389206 1214/2014 104932 TAYLOR MADE 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Page - 25 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GRILL 1,850.00 TECH FEES 358660 30038135 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 95.00- CREDIT 358661 30224949 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,379.40- CREDIT 358662 30225027 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,123.85- CREDIT 358663 30241177 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 973.56 MERCHANDISE 358659 30259766 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS'- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 225.31 389206 121412014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 149.10 358699 862230 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,492.35 358698 862231 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,641.45 389207 12/412014 134841 TRUEMAN WELTERS 47.15 BELT 00005744 358770 ID00880 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.15 389208 1214/2014 103973 ULINE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/412014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389208 121412014 103973 ULINE Continued... 612.23 DIAPER DISPOSALS 00002111 358579 62914975 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 612.23 389209 1214/2014 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,537.50 UNIFORMS - SEPT /OCT 358834 103114 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,270.29 UNIFORMS - SEPT /OCT 358834 103114 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,807.79 389210 121412014 101066 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 434.00 12/05 /14 APPEARANCE 358835 GRAND OPENING 5552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 434.00 389211 121412014 102212 UPBEAT INC 4,455.00 • DUGOUT BENCHES 00001922 358771 557310 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 4,455.00 389212 1214/2014 135232 UPPER MIDWEST ATHLETIC CONSTRUCTION 29,980.58 PAMELA PARK SHELTER - 358626 APPL 91 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 29980.68- 389213 12/412014 127291 URBAN COMPANIES LLC 104,500.00 PAMELA PARK SHELTER 358627 APPL #1 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 104,500.00 389214 1214/2014 100060 USPS ' 1,000.00 TMS #202739 358666 112614 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,000.00 389216 12/412014 - 101058 VAN PAPER CO. - 542.57 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS, TISSUE 358580 331318 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 8.88 PAPER PLATES 358772 331319 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 535.57 LIQUOR BAGS- 358772 331319 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING ` 12.02 LIQUOR BAGS 358773 331319 -01 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,099.04 389216 12/4/2014 101066 .VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 233.63 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001059 358512 8831554 1375.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 124.20 ELECTRICAL PART 00001058 358511 8831760 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 44.88 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001073 358510 8840365 _ 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 402.71 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 1212/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389216 12/4/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY Continued... 389217 1214/2014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 125.60 LIGHT BULBS 358513 15256037 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 125.60 389218 12/4/2014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 121.51 DUMPSTER 358774 7027661 5761.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENTENNIALLAKES OPERATING 121.51 389219 12/412014 102020 WELLS, GARY 28.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 358514 SUSA 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 28.00 389220 .12/4/2014 .101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1.12- 358705 64876 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 258.40- 358612 66282 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,983.83 358447 7006663 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,132.76 358822 7007158 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 189.16 358611 7007159 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,065.66` 358610 7007160 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 110.51 356704 7007528 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,267.71 358703 7007530 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING' 14,490.11 389221 12/4/2014 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 3,174.19 CIVITAS 358668 59775404 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 705.38 CIVITAS 358667 59778745 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,879.57 189222 12/412014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 123.65 358448, 1080254646 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,337.25 358450 1080254648 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 45.15 358449 1080254649 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 605.75 358454 1080256135 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.15 358452 1080256697 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 599.45 358451 1080256698 5862.5513 J COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,028.41 358453 1080256699 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,673.22 358823 1080257569 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.15 358614 1080257571 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,386.40 358615. 1080257572 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/204 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/412014 - 12/4/2014 Check # Date Amount Su_ pplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv. No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389222 121412014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 371:75 358613 1080257573 5842.5513 COST OF'.GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,634.81 358706 1080257614 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 591.30 358616 1080257615 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR" YORK SELLING 244.15 358617 1080257616 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 23,751.59 389223 12/4/2014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,915.00 358456 1090322457 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 130.50 358455 1090322458 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,658.70 358618 1090323197 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,082.60 358619 1090323198 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 123.00 358621 1090323199 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.10 358620 1090323200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,960.85 358824 1090325661 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 13, 893.75 389224 12/4/2014 136221 WYLIE, SALLY 97.50 ART WORK SOLD 358392 111714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 389226 121412014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,456.49 51- 0010060454 -7 358775 112014 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 16.31 51- 0010613106 -9 358531 434662074 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.91 51- 0194596 -8 358532 435545560 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 29.41 - -51 -0160483 -1 358525 435545927 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 37.12 51 -0223133 -2 358522 435546448 1322.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 36.79 51- 6541084 -2 358521 435643179 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 101.56 51- 9770164 -7 358520 435680172 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 30.60 51- 0010118404 -0 358523 435686393 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER, STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 114.12 51= 0010166207 -2 358524 435689373 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.91 51- 0193479-4 358526 435707553 5934.6185 LIGHT &POWER °' STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,184.90 51- 5107681 -4 358776 435786881 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,379.43 51- 5547446 -1 358777 435794787 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 7,313.88 51- 6644819 -9 358515 435813033 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 228.53 51- 8987646 -8 358530 435840672 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 42.12 51- 8976004 -9 358529 435840917 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING - REGULAR 638.09 51- 9011854 -4 358528 435841488 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 62.37- 51- 8997917 -7 - 358581 435842067 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 191.60 51- 9608462 -5 358527 435850227 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT_STATION MAINT 7,652.79 51- 9603061 -0 358778 435852091 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:25 Council Check Summary Page- 1 12/4/2014 - 12/4/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 88,928.16 '02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 130.29 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 650.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,224,321.95 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 365.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,614.72 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 12,300.84 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 8,865.15 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 3,075.53 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 3,875.11 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 16,803.88 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,284.57 - 05800 LIQUOR FUND 222,228.95 05900 UTILITY FUND 93,191.19 ' .05930 STORM SEWER FUND 27,084.79 09232 CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 2,647.50 Report Totals 1,713,367.63 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policie and procedures /ddDate Z y Wince Wrejd& X11' ,." �p, R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount 389225 12/412014 24.54 40.58 33.10 54.48 6,837.70 31,628.30 59,191.63 1,713, 367.63 Supplier / Explanation 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 9770163 -6 51- 0010103585 -7 51- 0010504853 =2 51- 4420190 -3 51 -6955679 -8 51- 4621797 -2 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA 12/2/2014 10:45:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/4/2014 — 12/412014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 358516 435854560 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 358518 435858639 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 358519 435872984 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 358517 435956798 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 358836 436179656 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER, CITY HALL GENERAL 358837 436341369 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,670,059.93 A/PACH Payment 43,307.70 Total Payments 1,713,367.63 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 359045 45855900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 300.60 359044 45903900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 103.80 Council Check Register by GL 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 655.75 359303 45991500 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary YORK SELLING 385.85 359302 45991600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 358853 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 639 12111/2014 100.20 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 359025 WO- 977610 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 370.23 1,280.39 DOOR REPAIR PARTS 358912 21411191 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 646 12111/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 1,280.39 34.29 640 12/1112014 103039.1 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY GENERALSUPPLIES 34.29 112.00 359176. 1846875 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 112.00 1,990.00 DESIGN SERVICES 359154 0172168 641 12/11/2014 1,990.00 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 610.33 COFFEE 358843 1154853 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . 112.78 COFFEE 359235 1156170 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 723.11 . 642 12/11/2014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 7,026.50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 359236 23270354.13 -11 04406.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 7,026.50 643 12/11/2014 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 1 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING. YORK SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION IMPR 123.55 359045 45855900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 300.60 359044 45903900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 103.80 359301 -. 45991200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 655.75 359303 45991500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 385.85 359302 45991600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,569.55 644 12111/2014. 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 113.37- RETURN 358854 CP- WO- 974708 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 225.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 359024 WO- 974402 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 118.33 CALENDARS 00003109 358853 WO- 976948 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.35 PENS 00003109 359102. WO- 977339 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 359025 WO- 977610 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 370.23 646 12111/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 34.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 358930 103039.1 15516406• GENERALSUPPLIES 34.29 - 646 12/11/2014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 1,990.00 DESIGN SERVICES 359154 0172168 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,990.00 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 L06IS101 VERNON SELLING PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING PRINTING CITY OF EDINA 2901981178 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359028 2901983939 Council Check Register by GL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359029 2901985625 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359030 2901988493 1318.6525 SALT, 12/11/2014- 12111/2014 359031 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier /,Explanation PO # Doc.No Inv No Account No 647 12/11/2014 SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 2902002793 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 653 12/1112014 114.45 SHAFT, GASKETS, O -RINGS 00005760 359239 900500 1553.6530 359118 27.03 LAMP 00005777 358932 906853 1553.6530 166.20 LAMP, INSTRUMENT PANEL 00005856 359240 913037 1553.6530 53.15 ARM ASSEMBLY 00005899 359241 914278 1553.6556. ` 360.83 648 12/11/2014 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 170.66 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 358933 35939 5862.6575 170.67 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 358933 35939 5822.6575 170.67 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 358933 35939 5842.6575 512.00 649 12/11/2014 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 106.92 OCE MAINTENANCE 00001229 358934 988345855 1552.6103 106.92 650 12111/2014 100677 CARGILL INC. 23,954.37 ROAD SALT 6,246.70 3,307.74 14,748.26 1,579.32 9,779.39 5,018.99 1,575.36 66,210.13 Subledger Account Description _ Continued... REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS 1219/2014 9:48:19 Page - 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION'GEN PRINTING VERNON SELLING PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING PRINTING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 00005070 359026 2901979253 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359027 2901981178 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359028 2901983939 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359029 2901985625 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359030 2901988493 1318.6525 SALT, SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359031 2901994350 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359032 2901999328 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 359033 2902002793 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 651 12/11/2014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 351.37 SAN PROJECT 359109 OW28623 421554.6710 8,192.57 SAN PROJECT 359110 QX19870 421554.6710 10,382.12 SAN PROJECT 359111 QX84953 421554.6710 18,926.06 652 12/1112014 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 504.00 IN FEES 358935 12114 1495.6103 504.00 653 12/1112014 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 258.00 'RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 359118 7070208558 1375.6103 258.00 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING-RAMP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 770920A 5862.5514 CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 1,917.55 359050 780666 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by GL 2,678.05 359051 780667 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 761137 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 359251 12/11/2014— 12111/2014 1470.6103 Check'. # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 663 12/11/2014 100613 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. Continued... 664 `12111/2014 104020 DALCO - 329.25 CAN LINERS, TISSUE 00009377 358943 2815710 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1001.4030 LODGING TAX _ 285.46 FLOOR CARE, MOPS 00001454 358942 2821173 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 614.71 658 12/11/2014 655 12/11/2014 1 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 3 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 13.00 359305 770920A 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,917.55 359050 780666 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,678.05 359051 780667 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 261.00 359306- 761137 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES ENVIRONMENT ARENA ICE MAINT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 4,969.60 666 12111/2014 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,784.00 NOV 2014 BILLINGS 359251 1762 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,784.00 667 12/11/2014 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 38,736.46 OCT 2014 LODGING TAX 358864 103114 1001.4030 LODGING TAX _ 38,736.46 658 12/11/2014 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 358952 2464523 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 669 12/11/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 195.70 CAMCO OIL 358867 46345 5521.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 195.70 660 12/11/2014 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 125.44 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 359223 120514 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 125.44 661 12/11/2014 132938 HOT DISH ADVERTISING LLC 504.02 END CAP RISER BRACKETS 359168 21859 5822.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 504.02 END CAP RISER BRACKETS 359168 "21859 5842.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 504.02 END CAP RISER BRACKETS 359168 21859 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,512.06 662 12/11/2014 129608 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES ENVIRONMENT ARENA ICE MAINT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit, 662 12/11/2014 129608 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS Continued... 3,292.91 MAIL WATER BILLS 358870 96480 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 508.02 MAIL LATE NOTICES 358871 96486 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,800.93 663 12/11/2014 - 100814 _INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. . 830.33 PVC, PIPE, FITTINGS 00001151 358962 883769 5915.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 830.33 664 12111/2014 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER -. 1,800.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 358966 9482 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,800.00 666 12111/2014 101483 MENARDS _ 9:59 BRAKE CLEANER, CLR REMOVER 00001806. 359258 67383 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 194.90 GLOVES, DRIVEWAY MARKERS 00008015 358875 72603 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 23.34 LIGHTS 00001139 _ 358876 72760 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 7. 16.01 BULBS, AIR FRESHENER 00001159 358967 73102 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 159.93 POSTS 00001161 358968 73114 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 403.77 666 12/1112014 129486 PAPCO INC. 212.55 TOWELS 359038:.89265 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 212.55 667 12/1112014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 2,284.12 TIRES, SERVICE 00005715 358974 210145154 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES EQUIPMENT.OPERATION GEN 62.50 ROAD FLAT REPAIR 00005734 359269 210151743 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,346.62 668 ;12/1112014 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING , 1,587.30 REPIPE FOR NEW METER 00001114 359271 17048 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS - METER REPAIR 1,587.30 669 12/1112014 101000 RJM PRINTING'INC. 57.50 BUSINESS CARDS - 359042 83967 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL . 107.50 BUSINESS CARDS 359041 63999 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 165.00 670 12/11/2014 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 72.00 TIMBER SPIKES --00001163 .358980 41260816 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 670 12/11/2014 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. Continued... 72.00 671 12/1112014 101004 SIPS COMPANIES 3.14 NUTS, BOLTS 00001108 359274 S3006423.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3.14 672 12/1112014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 9.43 RADIATOR CAP 00005675 358988 39690 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 182.46 VEHICLE REPAIRS 359275 663622 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.89 673 12/11/2014- 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 102.53 BULBS 00005857 359276 1558427 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.53 674 12/1112014 119464 VINOCOPIA 532.00 359322 0113137 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121,75 359323 0113139 -IN 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 180.00 359324 0113140 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 833.75 676 12/1112014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 178.68 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358895 41098897 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 583.66 358896 41105876 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 59.94 358897 41125566 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 787.82 356898 41134678 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 718.57 358899 41152960 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 2,328.69 676 12/11/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,258.85 359077 378932 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 448.25 359207 379119 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,707.10 369226 12/11/2014 129468 ACME TOOLS 17.25 CHAIN 358838 3018505 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 373.48 BERG SYSTEM, GAS CANS 358839 3022038 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 425.96 KOMBISYSTEM, CHAIN SAW 358840 3022041 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 369.26 BRISTLE BRUSH, CHAIN SAW 358841 3022047 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,185.95 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389226 12111/2014 129458 ACME TOOLS Continued... 389227 12/11/2014 136268 ADATO, DAPHINE 132.44 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359149 5025 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 132.44 389228 12/11/2014 130090 ALLU►NT ENGINEERING INC. 300.00 BIKE BLVD DESIGN 358913 55519 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION - 931.25 EVALUATION STUDY 358914 55527 01238.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC 1,231.25 389229 12111/2014 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 226.88- 359293 113014 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ' 316.42 359293 113014 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 529.36 359293 113014 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 110.60 359293 113014 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 80.48 359293 113014 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 128.14 359293 113014 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 199.44 359293 113014 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,591.32 389230 12/1112014 100695 -ANOKACOUNTY 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 359150 120414 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 r 389231 12/1112014 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 418.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 359151 412020058 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 418.42 389232 12/11/2014 102566 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 222.00 ANTENNA CABLE, POWER CABLE 358842 262167 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 222.00 389233 1211112014 131089 AQUATIC ROCK FORMATIONS LLC 548.80 WATERFALL ROCK ADDITION 359152 1497 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 548.80 389234 12/11/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 653.50 359177 3007895 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 916.75 359300 3007896 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 369234 12/11/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY - Continued... 7.00- 359178 302991 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,565.25 389236 12/11/2014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 278.20, 1 =14635 WASTE DISPOSAL 359214 120114 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 278.20- 389236 12/11/2014 120996 AVR INC. 385.00 READY MIX 358915 100044 5912.6520 CONCRETE WELL HOUSES 918.00 READY MIX 358919 100230 5912.6520 CONCRETE WELL HOUSES 990.00 READY MIX 358920 100464 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 1,210.00. READY MIX 358921 100465 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,210.00 READY MIX 358922 100694 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 935.00 READY MIX 358923 100695 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 400.00 READY MIX 358916 100814 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 660.00 READY MIX 358924 101064 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ' 655.00. READY MIX 358925 101195 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 385.00 READY MIX 358917 101314 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE i 880.00 READY MIX 356926 101779 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 330.00 READY MIX 358918 101949 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 361.50 READY MIX 358927 102968 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 9,319.50 389237 12/11/2014 123796 AXEL H OHMAN INC 3,735.00 RETAINAGE FEE 359023 APPL NO. 1 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 3,735.00 389238 12/1112014 102195 BATTERIES PLUS - 64.95 BATTERY BACK -UP 00001106 358844 '018- 355087 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 91.74 BATTERIES 00001170 358845 018- 356615 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 156.69 389239 12/11/2014 134026 BAUER BUILT TIRE 126.52 TIRE 00005870 358928 180152355 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.52 389240 12/11/2014 117379, BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,355.00 DEC2014 SNOWPLOWING 359215 143923 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,355.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 1219/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier,/ Explanation PO # 'Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 389241 1211112014 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER Continued... 428.49 GOPRO CAMERA 359101 120114 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 428.49 389242 12/1112014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 216.00 PIZZA 358847 D28IN2871 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 504.00 PIZZA 359153 D28IN2899 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 360.00 PIZZA 358846 D28IN2900 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,080.00 389243 1211112014 126139 BERNICK'S 400.40 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358848 178193 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 143.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358849 179627 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 464.00 359046 180867 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,007.40 369244 12/11/2014. 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY - ' 30.00 CHIPPEWA WATER 358850 1213055 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 775.30 COFFEE 358851 1213852 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS • 114.45 COFFEE 358852 1214972 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 919.75 389245 12/1112014 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 249.27 ART SUPPLIES 00009379 358929 3794196 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 249.27 389246 12111/2014 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,319.00 LIGHTING 00001567 359103 908450064 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 274.58 ` STUD PUNCH 00001152 _' 359237 908454976 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,593.58 389247 12/1112014 134926 BOSSARDT CORPORATION 1,500.00 50TH REMODEL 358931 20304 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,500.00 38924B 12/11/2014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 508.62 359047 123542 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 479.50 359304 123581 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 988.12 389249 12/1112014 136262 BOWELL, ROBERT , R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12111/2014— 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389249 12/11/2014 135262 BOWELL, ROBERT Continued... 261.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359238 5516 CHANTREY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RD 261.72 389260 12/11/2014 136257 BROWN, STEVEN R 1,174.48 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359104 120114 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,174.48 389261 12/11/2014 130861 BUILDING CONCEPTS & DESIGN 2,500.00 ED134088 ESCROW REFUND 359284 50 WOODLAND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CIRCLE 2,500.00 389262 12/1112014 136261 BURKE, DENNIS 300.00 LARGE DOGHOUSE 359105 103114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 389263 12111/2014 136255 BUSINESS BY DESIGN 474.43 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359106 4912 LINCOLN DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 474.43 389264 12/11/2014 100391 CALL ONE INC. 78.93 E911 DISPATCH EQUIPMENT 356855 539988 2310.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES E911 78.93 389266 12/11/2014 130076 CAMPBELL, JAMES 136.47 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359107 7702 TANGLEWOOD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CT - 136.47 389256 12/11/2014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5,333.45 359049 - 458469 5842.5514 COST. OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 356.70 359048 460212 - 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,690.15 389267 12/1112014 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 218.38 UNIFORM PURCHASE 359108 120214 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 218.38 389268 12/11/2014 129923 CAWLEY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check.Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389268 12/1112014 129923 CAWLEY 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 15.08 NAME BADGES 359155 V260064 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 15.08 359217 0297 -11/14 453.34 952 927 -8861 389269 12111/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY _ 633.02 796.47 5584304 -9 359112 5584304 -11/14 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 19.10 5584310 -6 359114 5584310 -11/14 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 30.71 5590919 -6 359113 5590919 - 11/14. 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER' 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 5511.6136 5915.6136 1504.6218 5110.6151 485.91 00086676- 0330288022 359156 330288022 -11/14 5310.6189 485.91 389266 12/11/2014 120433 COMCAST 79.39 8772 10 614 0164959 359242 164959 -11/14 5430.6188 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 359243 177449 -11/14 5420.6188 170.80 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 846.28 WATER TREATMENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 389260 12111/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 123.76 952 831 -0024 358856 0024 -11/14 55.92 952 929 -0297 359217 0297 -11/14 453.34 952 927 -8861 359216 8861 -11/14 633.02 389261 12/1112014 100683 CHEMSEARCH 669.12 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 358859 1706674 669.12 389262 12/11/2014 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 3,582.84 SEP /OCT /NOV LAB SERVICES 359115 120314 3,582.84 389263 12/11/2014 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 120.00 PSA PRODUCTION 359116 COM -0422 120.00 389264 12/11/2014 131038 CITY OF EDINA -,SENIOR CENTER 1,200.00 ANNUAL ROOM RENTAL 359117 120314 1,200.00 389265 12/11/2014 122084 CITY OF. EDINA -UTILITIES 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 5511.6136 5915.6136 1504.6218 5110.6151 485.91 00086676- 0330288022 359156 330288022 -11/14 5310.6189 485.91 389266 12/11/2014 120433 COMCAST 79.39 8772 10 614 0164959 359242 164959 -11/14 5430.6188 91.41 8772 10 614 0177449 359243 177449 -11/14 5420.6188 170.80 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389267 12/11/2014 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC., Continued... 583.96 CHAIN SAW 00003502 359218 96924 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 583.96 389268 12/11/2014 100696 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,040.99 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009366 358936 INV000092664 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 399.06 CLAYANDSUPPLIES 00009366 358937 INV000093082 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 48.45 CERAMIC REPAIR PARTS 00009364 358938 INV000093083 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS 280.82 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009374 358939 INV000093543 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 1,769.32 389269 12/11/2014 101704 COOK, BARBARA 58.52 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 358940 14 -1666 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 58.52 389270 12/11/2014 136247 COUNTRYSIDE FLAGPOLE 8,860.00 VETERANS MEMORIAL FLAGPOLES 358857 2014279 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8,860.00 389271 12/11/2014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 373.76 T- SHIRTS 358858 33294 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 758.71 BIRTHDAY MOOD CUPS 359157 33517 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,132.47 389272 12/11/2014 129660 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE 1,197.16 GOLF DOME - CLOSE OUT INVOICE 358862 41983 5200.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 46,092.20 SPORTS DOME ADMIN 358860 41985 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 825.38 REIMBURSEABLE EXPENSES 358861 41986 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 48,114.74 389273 12111/2014 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 37.66 ELBOW, CONNECTOR 00005898 358941 77179 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 37.66 389274 12/11/2014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,587.92 INDUCER MOTOR REPAIR 358863 3030869 5511.6136 PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER 1,587.92 389276 12/1112014 132366 DAVE ALAN HOMES INC. 2,500.00 ED132423 ESCROW REFUND 359285 4022 GRIMES AVE, 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 12/9/2014 9:46:19 Page - 11 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ADAPTIVE RECREATION VETERANS MEMORIAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389276 12/11/2014 132366 DAVE ALAN HOMES INC. Continued... 389276 12/11/2014 132510 DERING PIERSON GROUP 21,136.22 COUNTRYSIDE PARK SHELTER 359158 APPL NO. 7 47078.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATE 21,136.22 389277 12/11/2014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 559.31 110311893 359244 110311893 -11/14 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 92.50 651972955 359245 651972955 -11/14 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 651.81 - 389278 12/11/2014 123996 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 6,232.95 REFUSE 359247 DT0000956274 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH , 1,466.52 REFUSE 359246 DT0000956275 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 7,699.47 389279 12/11/2014 135268 DISTINCTIVE PROPERTIES OF EDINA LLC 2,500.00 ED131602 ESCROW REFUND 359286 5808 WOODDALE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS - AVE 2,500.00 389280 12/1112014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 2,362.05 NOV EDITION EDINA 359119 166784 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 2,362.05 389281 12/11/2014 130954 EDAM 250.00 MEMBERSHIP - BILL NEUENDORF 359120 120114 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 250.00 369282 12/11/2014 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 36.30 SWITCHES, WALLPLATES 00001124 359248 11428900 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE - 78.53 WIRE 00001167 359249 11454700 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 114.83 389283 12111/2014 133531 EDINA GIRLS HOCKEY BOOSTERS 250.00 PROGRAM AD FOR DOME 359250 2014 -2015 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 250.00 369284. 12111/2014 100049 EHLERS 3,755.00 2011AARBITRAGE MONITORING 359122 66156 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,000.00 2013B ARBITRAGE MONITORING 359121 66157 5210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:46:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12/11/2014 Check# Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389284 12/11/2014 100049 EHLERS Continued... 5,755.00 369286 12/1112014 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 152.75 SIREN MAINTENANCE 359219 113014 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 152.75 389286 12/11/2014 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 5,459.41 SQUAD BUILD UP 358944 RS4171 -1 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5,585.27 SQUAD BUILD UP 358945 RS4171 -2 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5,556.83 SQUAD BUILD UP 358946 RS4171 -3 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5,474.25 SQUAD BUILD UP 358947 RS4171 -4 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5,522.58 SQUAD BUILD UP 358948 RS4171 -5 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 27,598.34 389287 12/1112014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 1,318.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003709 359220 1695837 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,318.20 389288 12/1112014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 129.16 BATTERIES 358949 1- Z02899 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.45 FILTERS 359252 69- 160496 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 186.61 389289 12/1112014 122649 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 544.12 CONCESSION PRODUCT - 356865 3550857 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 891.54 CONCESSION PRODUCT 358866 3566832 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,435.66 369290 12/1112014 106036 FASTENAL COMPANY 170.72 DRILL SET, BOLTS 00001135 358950 MNSTU57640 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 170.72 389291 12/1112014 136270 FELICITY HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ED135073 ESCROW REFUND 359287 5312. WINDSOR 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 389292 12/11/2014 119211 FIRSTLAB 386.55 DRUG TESTING 356951 FL00106820 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 386.55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12111/2014 Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389292 12/1112014 119211 FIRSTLAB Continued... 389293 12/11/2014 1,050.00 1,050.00 389294 1211112014 20,000.00 20,000.00 389296 1211112014 28.13 28.13 389296 12/11/2014 - 28.13 28.13 389297 12/11/2014 318.87 318.87 389298 12/11/2014 2,145.50 2,145.50 389299 12111/2014 778.50 778.50 389.300 12111/2014 675.58 266.15 81.92 - 131.40- 59.04 59.04 91.03- 84.90 85.00 22.28 136266 FITZGERALD, KEN 4/11/15 CANCELATION REFUND 134006 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GS PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE ELECTION JUDGE 116961 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH ELECTION JUDGE 136263 GOLF BUDDY GPS RANGE FINDER 132603 GOLFNOW G1 LLC ONSITE TRAINING 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. NOV 2014 SERVICE 00001104 101103 GRAINGER GAS DETECTOR 00008009 BATTERY PACK, CHARGER 00002120 RETURN 00002120 RETURN 00002120 DOOR CHIME 00001130 DOOR CHIME 00001130 CREDIT 00002119 LIGHTS, RESPIRATORS 00002125 TIMER, INSECT SPRAY 00002127 WINTER GLOVES 00002125 359294 BRAEMAR OUP 358953 G20 -11274 359095 120414 359096 120414 359253 121078 359159 5100078728 358954 128391 - 358868 9592784483 359160 9597050302 359161 9597676544 359162 9597676551 359221 9599931699 359221 9599931699 359163 9600254602 359164 9600378104 359165 9600849948 359166 9601828008 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page 14 Business Unit 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION - 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS, 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH.ST 000UPANCY 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary '12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389360 12/1112014 101103 GRAINGER - Continued... 269.60 NITRILE GLOVES 00001146 '358960 960182BO16 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 269.60 NITRILE GLOVES 00001154 358959 9603477473 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.16 PADLOCK, WELDING GOGGLES 00005812 358957 9604203241 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.56 SAFETY GLASSES 00005812 358958 9604203258 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.92 DOOR CHIME 359222 9604800111 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 35.92, DOOR CHIME 359222 9604800111 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 162.00 BATTERY PACK 00001169 358955 9605369090 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 49.98 CABLE TIES 00001171 358956 9605781641 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,823.38 389301 12/11/2014, 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 242.25 359052- 174965 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,961.50 359307 .174990 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,203.75 389302 12/11/2014 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE 111 19.50 ELECTION JUDGE 359097 120414 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 389303 12111/2014 120369 HALLORAN, BARBARA 19.50. ELECTION JUDGE 359098 120414 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 19.50 389304 12/11/2014 .105636 HANDMADE TILE ASSOCIATION 509.15 EDINA ART CENTER AD 358961 2103 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 509.15 369306 12/1112014 128208 HEINZMAN, DAN 23.00 CERTIFICATION FEE 358124 120314 5919.6260. LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 389306 12/11/2014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 359167 37420 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 389307 12/11/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,737.31 OCT 2014 ROOM & BOARD 358869 1000052026 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 2,737.31 389308 12/11/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 848.00 CITY OF. EDINA 735585 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by GL r 735918 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice& Summary 2,299.50 12/11/2014 — 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389308 12/11/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 17.00 PAID DUES TWICE Continued... REFUND 1628.4392.01 4,134.59 2015 TNT MAILING 359125 TNT2015 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 4,134.59 - 389316 389309 12/11/2014 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION LLC 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,016.92 NOV 2014 BOOKING FEES 359126 1000052.095 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 2,016.92 240.00 389310 12/11/2014 106436 HEN NEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 389316 12/11/2014 133301 INFINITY, CUSTOM BUILDERS LLC 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 359128 1000052305 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,500.00 150.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 359127 1000052306 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 300.00 AVE 369311 12/11/2014 134780 HIGHMARK BUILDERS 2,500.00 2,500.00 ED129268 ESCROW REFUND 359288 6917 MARK 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF.MINN 'TERRACE DR 2,500.00 389312 12111/2014 128216 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 1,738.00 .PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 359254 121214 01249.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1,738.00 389313 12/1112014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1219/2014 9:46:19 Page - 16 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING INSPECTIONS A -249 LAKE EDINA RECON LANDSCP 848.00 359308 735585 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,451.50 359053 735918 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING - 2,299.50 389314 12111/2014 136262.: HOTCHKISS, NANCY 17.00 PAID DUES TWICE 359123 REFUND 1628.4392.01 SR CENTER MEMBERSHIP SENIOR CITIZENS 17.00 - 389316 12/11/2014 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION LLC 240.00 OFFICIATING FEES 358872 323 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 240.00 389316 12/11/2014 133301 INFINITY, CUSTOM BUILDERS LLC 2,500.00 ED124976 ESCROW REFUND 359289 5812ASHCROFT 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 389317 12/1112014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF.MINN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389317 12/11/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 5,819.85 359310 2286784 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 189.60 359309 2286785 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,190.99 359179 2303604 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 38.80 359180 2303605 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 430.00 359181 2303607 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14,669.24 389318 12/11/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 147.76 359058 5030917 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .38 359311 5033388 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,037.50 359057 5035603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,903.80 359055 5035604 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,349.60 359059 5035605 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 231.48 359054 5037003 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 891.60 359056 5037075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 891.60 359060 5037076 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.66- 359317 503930 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .38 359188 5040884 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,274.67 359316 5040886 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 359313 5040887 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .58 359312 5040893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,470.04 359186 5040895 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,047.32 359314 5040896 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,638.29 359187 5040897 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,181.73 359182 5040898 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,448.00 359185 5040899 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 70.82 359184 5040900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,608.81 359315 5040901 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,506.99 359183 5040902 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,758.20 359191 5040903 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,212.76 359192 5040904 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,199.53 359193 5040905 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1 ,634.69 359189 5040906 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,261.50 359194 5040907 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 988.36 359190 5040908 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 984.76 359195 5040909 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 48.00- 359061 505161 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 52,679.65 369319 12/1" 129616 JOHNSON, ZACHARY SCOT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF. EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12111/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 389319 12/11/2014 129516 JOHNSON, ZACHARY SCOT 150.00 12121 /14 PERFORMANCE 359129 120114 5710.6136 150.00 389320 12/1112014 — 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 3,840.00 RAMP INSPECTIONS 359034 6148486 1375.6103 86,406.93 50TH/FRANCE IMPROVEMENTS 359130 6259618 44012.6710 49,031.35 RAMP ELEVATOR DESIGN 359035 6264687 44012.6710 2,939.26 FOUNDATION CONSULTING 358963 6264688 5840.6103 142,217:54 389321 12/11/2014 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 142.25 COAT 359036 SIN2277182 1140.6406 142.25 389322 12/11/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 954.85' PLOW BOLTS, WASHERS, NUTS 00005852, 358964 9302898924 1553.6530 954.85 389323 12111/2014 136267 LDK BUILDERS INC. 2,500.00 ED128232 ESCROW REFUND 359290 5639 TRACYAVE 1495.4109 2,500.00 389324 12/1112014 101662 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 129,229.75 QUARTERLY - WORKERS COMP 359256 28668 1550.6200 97,512.00 QUARTERLY - MUNICIPALITY 359255 48481 1550.6200 226,741.75 389326 1211112014 136260 LYNDA.COM INC. 1,750.00 LYNDAPRO TRAINING 359131 INVO1161829 1554.6104 1,750.00 389326 12/11/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 196.00 SHEAR BOLTS AND NUTS 00005813 359257 2150361 1553.6530 196.00 389327 12/11/2014 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11,876.93 DIESEL FUEL 00005804 358965 56705 1553.6581 11,876.93 389328 12/11/2014 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP Subledger Account Description Continued... PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSURANCE INSURANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS REPAIR PARTS GASOLINE 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 18 EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PARKING RAMP P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389328 12/1112014 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP Continued... 112.30 REROUTE DATA CABLE 358873 494412 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 112.30 389329 12111/2014 102600, MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 270.00 POLYCOM SETUP 359224 77475 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 270.00 389330 12/11/2014 135256 MCCARTHY, SUSAN M .217.64 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359132 120114 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 217.64 389331 12/11/2014 134646 MCGRATH, PATTY 118.72. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 359169 120414 5710.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 118.72 389332 12111/2014 134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 1,362.81 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 359234 121214 07121.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 17,850.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 359234 121214 01411.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2,983.23 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 359234 121214 05541.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 12,701.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 359234 121214 03483.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5,325.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 359234 121214 04399.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PA_ YMENTS 40,223.37 389333 12/11/2014 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS ' 2,827.25 OLD LOG THEATER TRIP 358874 112014 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 2,827.25 389334 12/11/2014 104156 MENARDS 200.47 POLY SCOOP SHOVELS 358877 82756 .5511.6406' GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.47 389336 12/11/2014 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 358878 4620 1621/6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 358879 -4635 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 342.00 389336 12/1112014 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL.SERV 385,231:33 SEWER SERVICE -JAN 2015 359037 0001039182 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO - 385,231.33 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 19 Business Unit AR E NA'A D M I N I S T RATI O N CENT SERV GEN - MIS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION S121 STRACHAUERPARK B SIDEWALK EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES SEWER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 1219/2014 9:48:19 -, Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 _ Council Check Register by Invoice& Summary 12111/2014- 12111/2014 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389337 12/11/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 45.79 .WIREASSEMBLY 00005761 359337 491068 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.79 369336 12/11/2014 104650 .MICRO CENTER 99.99 APPLE TV 00004421 359225 5242884 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.99 MEMORY REPL 00004421 359225 5242884 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 9.99 USB HUB 00004430 359296 5257310 5210.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 259.97 " 389339 12/11/2014 106107 MIDWEST BLINDS 232.25 WINDOW SHADE 358969 30754 5800.1720 BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 232.25 389340 12/11/2014 136264 MIDWEST CONTAINER SYSTEMS LLC 1,605.25 CABINET 00005815 359259 26064 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,605.25 369341 12/1112014 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 153.14 NORMANDALE POSTCARD MAILING 359133 73777 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 153.14 389342 12/11/2014 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 12,001.36 NOV 2014 WATER PURCHASE 359226 431- 0005.300 -12 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION /14 12,001.36 369343 12111/2014 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 42.97 CO2, METHAIR 359227 171115466 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 42:97 389344 12/1112014 118144 MINNESOTA`PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 30.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 358970 155225 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER. 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 358970 155225 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 30.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 358970 155225 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 90.00 369346 12/11/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 200.00 BRINE PUMP 00001126 359134 0107256 -IN 1648.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 50.52 NOZZLE BODIES 00005869 359260 0107257 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION!GEN r` 250.52 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389346 12/11/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. Continued... 389346. 12/1112014 120604 MINT CONDITION DETAILING INC. " 125.00 INTERIOR PACKAGE 358880 44904 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - 125.00 389347 12/1112014 104661 MONTGOMERY, BETH 30.94 ELECTION JUDGE 359099 120414 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 30.94 389346 12/11/2014 108637 MOORE, JOEL 60.11 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT 359170 120414 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.11 389349 12/1112014 127348 NAVIS PACK AND SHIP MN -1094 435.26 PRO SHOP SHIPPING 359261 AB591280 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 435.26 389360 12/11/2014 127647 NEAL, SCOTT H. 86.52 MAY 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 115.41 JUL2014 359295 APR-NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 122.97 JUN 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 139.16 APR 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 139.55 AUG 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 253.34 SEP 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 282.57 NOV 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 286.21 OCT 2014 359295 APR -NOV MILEAGE 1120.61 D7 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 1,425.73 369361 12/11/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 169.50 359196 95749 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 754.50 359062 95750 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 924.00 389362 12111/2014 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2,116.73 U- CHANNEL POSTS 00001070 358971 TI- 0280649 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,116.73 389363 12/1112014 104360 NIKE USA INC. ` 9.00. SHIPPING CHARGE 359263 965920947 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,140.00 GOLF BALLS 359262 965920948 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12/1112014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO_ # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389363. 12/11/2014 104360 NIKE'USA INC. Continued... DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERALSUPPLIES 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 22 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INCOME ON INVESTMENTS SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES ELECTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,149.00 389364 12/11/2014 133373 NOREX INC. 3,315.00 MEMBERSHIP. RENEWAL 359264 635798/16/SGS 1554.6105 ' 3,315.00 389366 12/1112014 136263 NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH 75.00 ROOM RENTAL FEE 359135 REFUND 5913.6406 75.00 '389366 12/1112014 130467 NORTH METRO COMPANIES 567.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 359265 121214 5960.6103 567.00 389367 12/1112014 100374 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY 1,000.00 SUPERVISION TRAINING 358972 3402 1400.6104 1,000.00 389368 12111/2014 134814 NUVEEN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC '- 6,501.33 3RD QTR FEE 359136 120611 1001.4706 6,501.33 389369 12/11/2014 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 28.13 ELECTION JUDGE 359100 120414 1180.6013 28.13 (• 389360 12/1112014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 56.20 JIMMY BAR 00001136 358881 550515 1646.6556 65.007 RINK CLIPS 00001165 359266 550743 1648.6406 121.20 389361 12111/2014 101669 ORKIN 32.22 PESTCONTROL 359137 98483503 1551.6103 32.22 389362 12/11/2014 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 8.80- 359066 8475992 -CM 5862.5513 2,708.29 359063 8477026 -IN 5842.5513 589.33 359064 8477042 -IN 5862.5513 133.25 359065 6477066 -IN 5862.5512 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERALSUPPLIES 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 22 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INCOME ON INVESTMENTS SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES ELECTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 359067 2704455 5842.5513 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 210.32 359200 2708089 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by GL ' .20 359203 2708094 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 359202 2708097 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 844.00 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 2708098 Check # Date Amount Supplier ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389362 12111/2014 YORK SELLING 100347 PAUSTIS.WINE COMPANY 2708100 Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,422.07 359198 2706101 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 389363 12/11/2014 359199 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,529.40 359318 637.82 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 358882 49425049 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 853.15- 358884 49425108 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,887.40 358883 49425121 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 347.94 359267 50598063 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,020.01 389364 12/11/2014 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 250.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 358973 120114 -3 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00 389,366 12/11/2014 119372 PETSMART #463 99.76 K9 FOOD 358885 T -7007 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 99.76 389366 12/1112014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 23 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS GRILL ARENA CONCESSIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM COMMUNICATIONS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 240.00 359067 2704455 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 210.32 359200 2708089 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ' .20 359203 2708094 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,265.28 359202 2708097 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 844.00 359204 2708098 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,270.60 359201 2708099 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,072.47 359197 2708100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 539.65 359198 2706101 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON.SELLING 332.02 359199 2708102 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,529.40 359318 2708266 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,303.94 389367 12/11/2014 100964 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 85.32 TIRE 00005871 359268 0019311301114 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 85.32 389368 12/11/2014 100968 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 359039 4565174 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44.89 1 389369 12/11/2014 126979 PRECISE MRM LLC 100.00 GPS 358886 IN200- 1003739 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA - 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014— 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389369 12/11/2014 126979 PRECISE MRM LLC Continued... 100.00 ' 389370 12/11/2014 128861 PRIMARY - PRODUCTS COMPANY 69:28 NITRILE GLOVES 100005736 358975 54659 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.28 389371 12/11/2014 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING 909.55 HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND 359270 120214 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 909.55 389372 12/1112014 130080 RANGER GM 32,588.18 2015 CHEVROLET TAHOE 00003093 359040 9994194 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 32,588.18 389373 12/1112014 136265 RAVAZ DESIGNS 1,780.00 POND REPAIRS 359272 120114 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,780.00 389374 12/11/2014 106672 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA -. 26.25 RABIES VIRUS TEST 359338 2082599080 1450.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL 26.25 389376 12111/2014 126936 REINDERS INC. 508.71 ICE MELT 358976 3029526 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 508.71 389376 12/11/2014 123767 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 2,745.50 ABOUT TOWN AD SALES 359171 1114151 -7 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 2,745.50 389377 12/11/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 162.36 SOFTENER SALT 00001141 358977 00307994 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 140.88 SOFTENER SALT. 00001142 358978 00307995 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 303.24 389378 12/11/2014 100603 RON KASSA CONSTRUCTION INC. 475.00 CONCRETE'SLAB 359138 DOG KENNEL 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 475.00 . 389379 12/11/2014 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389379 12/11/2014 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS Continued... 667.00 OAK WILT INSPECTION 358979 908485563 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE - 667.00 389380 12/11/2014 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 995.00 TRAINING CLASSES 359043 110514 1261.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 995.00 389381 12/11/2014 117099 SAFETY SIGNS 1,470.40. TRAFFIC CONTROL 00001113 359273 14203131 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,470.40 389382 12/11/2014 100996 SEH 1,071.50 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 358887 289759 05525.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 1,071.50 389383 12/1112014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 206,449.00 PROJECTDOX SOFTWARE 00003881 359213 602744752 4612.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FD Plan Review Software ' 206,449.00 389384 12/11/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 47.64 DISPLAY SIGNS 358981 6513 5622.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 95.26 DISPLAY SIGNS 358981 6513 5642.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 119.10 DISPLAY SIGNS 358981 8513 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 99.50, BANNER PRINTING 356982 8520 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 878.00 FPW SITE SIGNS 358889 8527 9234.6106 MEETING EXPENSE GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 185.00 DASHERBOARD 358888 8530 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 185.00 DASHERBOARD 359139 8542 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,609.50 389386 12/11/2014 131886 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES;INC. 59.82 HOT DOG BUNS. 358890 254381 5520.5510af' COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 59.82 389386 12/11/2014 100430 SNAP- ON1NDUSTRIAL 113.46 SOCKET SET 00005810 358983 ARV124254719 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 645.99 CREEPER, SOCKETS 00005810 358984 ARV/24255436 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 759.45 389387 12/11/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 819.97 359206 1230605 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLIN," R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA . 1269 ' . ,a 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL. Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12111/2014- 12111/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389387 12/1112014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 93.75 359069 1230607 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,547.59 359070 1230608 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,879.93 359071 1230609 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,100.96 359068 1230610 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.66 359074 1230611 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,666.51 359072 1230612 - 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,407.50 359205 1230613 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 829.30 359073 5007987 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 263.30. 359075 5007990 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 24,699.47 " 389388 .12/11/2014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 723.32 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 358985 113014 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 723.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 358985 113014 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 723.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 358985 113014 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,170.00 389389 12/11/2014 102786 STOP TECH LTD 61.85 CORD REELS 358986 T004678 -IN 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 61.85 389390 12/11/2014 101016 STREICHERS 4,017.75 AMMO 358987 11117136 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL • 100.99 UNIFORM SHIRT CARRIER 358891 11122001 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,118.74 389391 12/11/2014 135271 SWEDER, DONALD V 718.20 ARTWORK SOLD 359297 120314 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 718.20 - 389392 12/11/2014 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 340.70 POLY SHOVELS 00001149 358989 S206296 -1N 1646.6556 TOOLS - BUILDINGMAINTENANCE 340.70 389393 12111/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 35.10 359319 862950 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING _ 2,329.90 359320 862951 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,365.00 389394 12/1112014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 LOGO GOLF BALLS 358892 0288253 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CITY OF EDINA 309.35 GOLF CLUB 359277 0303842 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 352.35 Council Check Register by GL 389399 12/11/2014 136269 TJB HOMES INC. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2,500.00 ED134668 ESCROW REFUND 359292 5905 ASHCROFT 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 12/11/2014— 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account D_ escription 389394 12/11/2014 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. Continued... 665.78 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 359228 3001434956 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 665.78 389396 12/11/2014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 358990 2014 - 116158 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 358990 2014 - 116158 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 358990 2014 - 116158 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 990.00 389396 12/1112014 132616 TIMBERLAND HOMES AND REMODELING 2,500.00 ED134585 ESCROW REFUND 359291 6120 RIDGEWAY 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT RD 2,500.00 389397 - 12/1112014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 176.00 PARK BOARD MINUTES 358991 M20941 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 176.00 389398 12/11/2014 101474 TITLEIST 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Page - 27 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING INSPECTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 43.00 LOGO GOLF BALLS 358892 0288253 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 309.35 GOLF CLUB 359277 0303842 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 352.35 389399 12/11/2014 136269 TJB HOMES INC. 2,500.00 ED134668 ESCROW REFUND 359292 5905 ASHCROFT 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 389400 12/11/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 367.20 359321 643 367.20 389401 12/11/2014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 71.19 WELDING GAS 359278 40018823 71.19 389402 12111/2014 123470 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT /KIDSDANCE PRODUCTION 600.00 DJ FOR NEW YEAR'S EVE PARTY 359172 2035 600.00 5862.5513 1553.6556 5710.6136 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION = R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 110.00 389409 Council Check Register by GL 101068 VAN PAPER CO. Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 358994 331854-00 1645.6406 595.11 12/11/2014— 12111/2014 12/1112014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 389403 12/11/2014 1;980.00 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 389411 Continued... 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,775.00 FENCE REPAIR 00001105 358992 3041270 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 358995 8837702 1553.6585 1,775.00 120.00 389412 389404 12/11/2.014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 111.75 NOV 2014 USAGE 358893 269634 -12/14 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 111.75 389406 12/11/2014 116636 TRAVELERS 2,419.00 359281 000473228 1550.6200 INSURANCE - 1,785.00 359280. 000473229 1550.6200 INSURANCE 385.00 359282 000473590 1550.6200 INSURANCE 163.00 DEDUCTIBLE 359279 000473591 1550.6200 INSURANCE 4,752.00 389406 12/1112014 103218 TRI -STATE BOBCAT 39.00 SPROCKET 358993 P39260 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 39.00 389407 12/11/2014 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 8.73 SHIPPING CHARGE 359140 IRAN: 8590 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.73 389408 12/1112014 101364 USGA 110.00 ANNUAL DUES 359173 43750116 - BRAEMA 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS i GENERAL SUPPLIES 121912014 9:48:19 Page - 28 Business Unit MMUIFINAREW POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION LITTER- REMOVAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS _ ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R 110.00 389409 12/11/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 595.11 CAN LINERS 00001158 358994 331854-00 1645.6406 595.11 389410 12/1112014 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,980.00 DEC 2014.SERVICE 358894 34304 5511.6103 1;980.00 389411 12111/2014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 120.00 ELECTRICAL CONNECTION 00001072 358995 8837702 1553.6585 120.00 389412 12/11/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. i GENERAL SUPPLIES 121912014 9:48:19 Page - 28 Business Unit MMUIFINAREW POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION LITTER- REMOVAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS _ ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 205.88 1400.6104 - 389414 12/11/2014 CITY OF EDINA 136269 WATERS OF EDINA LLC, THE 12/9/2014 9:48:19 16,443.97 STORM DRAINAGE OVERPAYMENT ASSESSING 16,443.97 Council Check Register by GL 389415 12/11/2014 Page- 29 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 359329 .243.60 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 243.60 , 5842.5513 389416 12/1112014 7008577 130574 WATSON COMPANY 359208 12/11/2014 - 12/11/2014 5862.5513 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389412 12111/2014 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 389418 12/11/2014 Continued... 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 438.83 MEETINGS REIMBURSEMENT 359076 62684 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 242.58 438.83 389419 12/11/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,920.00 389413 12/1112014 133629 - VON HANSONS MEATS 820.00 69.76 358901 82478 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 18,087.57 136.12 BRATS 358900 82481 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 543.53 359174 6300 COLONIAL 5900.2015 WAY CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 359175 120514 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 358902 845905 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 359141 205.88 1400.6104 - 389414 12/11/2014 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 136269 WATERS OF EDINA LLC, THE 120814 16,443.97 STORM DRAINAGE OVERPAYMENT ASSESSING 16,443.97 120814 389415 12/11/2014 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 359329 .243.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 359330 243.60 , 5842.5513 389416 12/1112014 7008577 130574 WATSON COMPANY 359208 861.31 5862.5513 861.31 389417 12/11/2014 120613 WHITE, AARON 72.79 TRAINING EXPENSES 72.79 389418 12/11/2014 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 96.33 MEETINGS REIMBURSEMENT 146.25 MEETINGS REIMBURSEMENT 242.58 389419 12/11/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,920.00 1,840.00 820.00 5,080.00 75.16 18,087.57 1.16 1,348.76 543.53 359174 6300 COLONIAL 5900.2015 WAY CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 359175 120514 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 358902 845905 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 359141 120414 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 359298 120814 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 359298 120814 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 359325 7007024 5862.5513 359326 7007255 5842.5513 359328 7007256 5842.5513 359327 7007257 5842.5513 359078 7007638 5862.5513 359329 7008573 5842.5513 359330 7008574 5842.5513 359209 7008577 5842.5513 359208 7008578 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SEU, -' R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 12/9/2u14 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014- 12111/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 389419 12/11/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 29,716.18 389420 12/11/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 181.53 359212 1080257570 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,871.00 359084 1080260168 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,892.70 359086 1080260169 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,592.50 359085 1080260170 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,547.94 359211 1080260173 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 151.27 359.080 1080260244 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING . 1,173.25 359083 1080260245 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.30. 359082 1080260246 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 184.29 359079 1080260247 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 15,132.87 359081 1080260248 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 163.15 359331 1080261432 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.00- 359089 2080064350 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 56.00- 359087 2080064356 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 154.00- , 359090 2080064363 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 77:00- 359088 2080064369 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING '15.00- 359334 2080064389 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 17.08- 359332 2080064396 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3.75- 359333 2080064418 5862.5512 COST OFGOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 298.80. 359335 2080065993 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK•SELLING 35,247.17 389421 12111/2014 124629 -WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 661.00 359093 1090325868 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 246.00 359094 1090325869 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING . 2,651.90 359091 1090326505 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 246.00 359092 1090326506 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,198.00 359336 1090328665 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,002.90 389422 1211112014 136264 WOOLDRIDGE, KAREN A 34.57 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 359142 6304 DORON LANE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 34.57 389423 12/11/2014 136261 WORM, SANDY 220.00 HAY BALES FOR TRAINING 359283 120414 1470.6579 TRAININGAIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 220.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY,OF EDINA 12/9/2014 9:48:19 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 12/11/2014 12/11/2014 Check # Date Amount 389424 12/11/2014 10.52 1,890.09 11.98 93.72 35.86 840.27 22.54 978.54 392.13 78.43 452.99 1,559.81 265.51 41.63 225.41 4,320.16 28,613.81 154.10 966.46 1,328.52 1,649.22 487.94 3,575.61 47,995.25 1,780,977.41 Supplier / Explanation 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51- 0010619811 -5 51- 4159265 -8 51- 0010619810 -4 51- 6692497 -0 51- 8102668 -0 51- 9251919-0 51. 4151897 -6 51- 4827232 -6 51- 5634814 -2 51- 5938955 -6 51- 6229265 -9 51- 6229265 -9 51- 6046826 -0 51- 7567037 -0 51- 9337452 -8 51- 0837548 -4 5111888627 -1 51- 6137136 -8 51- 6979948 -4 51- 697994811 51- 6979948 -4 51- 9422326-6 51- 6840050 -6. Grand Total PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 359147 435534261 1321.6185 359146 435602032 7411.6185 359148 435879140 1321.6185 358903 436179118 1460.6185 358909 436377003 1321.6185 358904 436388483 5765.6185 358905 436478461 1646.6185 358906 436486921 5311.6185 - 358911 436501591 5934.6185 358910 436504526 4086.6185 359144 436509837 1481.6185 359144 436509837 1470.6185 359145 436511021. 5422.6185 358907 436525566 1321.6185 358908 436548113 1321.6185 359143 436573954 5915.6185 359230 436676936 5511.6185 359232 436695644 5430.6185 359231 436707734 5821.6185 359231 436707734 5861.6185 359231 436707734 5841.6185 359233 436734309 1322.6185 359299 437034449 5921.6185 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT &POWER LIGHT & POWER 'LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER .LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,611,244.83 A/PACH Payment 169;732.58 Total Payments 1,780,977.41 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING REGULAR . PSTF OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CIVILIAN DEFENSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PROMENADE EXPENSES BUILDING MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION STORM LIFT STATION MAINT AQUATIC WEEDS YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR WATER TREATMENT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT r R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 482,985.13 02300 POLICE SPECIAL'REVENUE 78.93 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 1,362.81' 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 402,261.63 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND. 79,112.58 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,775.19 - 05200 -GOLF DOME FUND 3,917.87 ,• 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,464.45 -- 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 5,968.15 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 44,429.29 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 46,917.58 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 8,979.63 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND' 2,722.36 05800 LIQUOR FUND 217,213.11 05900 UTILITY FUND 459,453.69 " 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 13,311.31 - 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,895.70 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 250.00 09234 GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT 878.00 Report Totals 1,780,977.41 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 12/11/2014 - 12111/2014 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims - comply'in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and 12/9/2014 9:48:32 Page- 1 trlA. To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV. C. The Recommended Bid is From.: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: December 16, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — One 2015 Ford Police Interceptor Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: Company: Nelson Auto Center Amount of Quote or Bid: $31,565.95 Recommended Quote or Bid: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Contract # 37669 Release A- 175(5) General Information: Replacement of one marked police interceptor vehicle involved in motor vehicle accident. Insurance claim has been filed. City of Edina -i 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Date: December 16, 2014 Subject: Public Safety Class A Uniforms Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: June, 16, 2014 Company: Uniforms Unlimited Streicher's Siegel's Uniforms Recommended Quote or Bid: Uniforms Unlimited ok /Le Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: December 31, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $43,000.00 $44,351.00 $56,019.00 General Information: Provide Class A Dress Uniform for all sworn police officers and firefighters. The appearance of our uniformed employees greatly influences public perceptions and imparts a distinct image to our community and fosters an esprit de corps amongst the group. The uniform is equivalent to the civilian black tie and our Class A Uniform will distinguish our members from other public safety agencies. The Uniform will be worn during events that would dictate such formality, i.e., award ceremonies, memorials, funerals, graduations, etc. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. E. From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Agreement With Expert T Billing for Ambulance Billing Services Action Requested: Authorize Agreement With Expert T Billing for Ambulance Billing Services Information / Background: Expert T Billing has provided ambulance billing services for the City for many years. Expert T,Billing services include working with the Fire Department to receive patient care reports, and working with patients, insurance companies, and /or Medicare to determine financial responsibilities. Expert T Billing also works closely with the Finance Department to reconcile lists of open accounts and follow up on delinquent accounts appropriately. If approved, the attached agreement would extend our current relationship with Expert T Billing through December 31, 2015. We currently pay Expert T Billing $26.50 per ambulance. patient to provide these services. We expect Expert T Billing to bill approximately 3,000 patients on our behalf in 20IS. Additional Information / Background: . Ambulance service billing agreement between Expert T Billing and City of Edina Ambulance HIPAA Business Associate Addendum between City of Edina Ambulance and Expert T Billing City of Edina • 4801 W: 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 BETWEEN AND THE CITY OF EDINA AMBULANCE This agreement for service made as of January 1, 2015 between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "CITY) and Expert TBilling, a Minnesota company .( "CONTRACTOR") shall specify the billing services the CONTRACTOR will provide to the CITY. 1. CONTRACTOR SERVICES AND .OBLIGATIONS 1.1 The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide and furnish ambulance billing service for the accounts receivable of the CITY as follows: 1.1.1 Preparation of initial and monthly statements for all accounts and mailing to responsible parties. 1.1.2 Processing insurance on accounts that are subject to Medicare, Minnesota Care and Medicaid coverage. 1.1.3 Processing and assisting individuals with accounts and with third party insurance payments (private insurance) in order to coordinate payment to the CITY. 1.1.4 Issue up to three (3) billing statements on each account. 1.1.5 Issue delinquent account letters on all accounts that have not had any payment activity for 120 days. 1.1.6 Perform telephone follow -up calls on accounts to patients, medical providers, insurance carriers, or other facilitators to ensure reasonable collection efforts have been attempted. This would include the use of internet resources when applicable. 1.1.7 Per CITY authorization or directive, refer to a designated collection agency all delinquent accounts which have failed to have payment activity after the delinquent account letter was mailed and telephone calls made. 1.1.8 All accounts authorized for collection agency handling and as permitted under MN State Statute 270 A, shall be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and certified for collection per the Minnesota Revenue Recapture Act. 1. 1.9 Furnish to the CITY a monthly accounting of all charges and revenue statements handled during the month as well as other billing system reports. -1- 1.1.10 Respond to inquiries from individuals who have received ambulance service which are related to their accounts and balances due. 1.1.11 Forward complaints and all written comments received regarding the CITY to the CITY'S designee. 1.1.12 Retain possession of a back -up billing software program at a secure off - site location. 1.1.13 Perform and maintain a computer back -up of accounts receivable records on a daily basis. 1.1.14 Upon termination of this agreement, return to the CITY all accounts receivable records and billing information as provided'by the CITY over the course of the billing agreement(s). 1.1.15 Train and, where required, license CONTRACTOR personnel to provide services hereunder and to provide such services in accordance with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and rules of federal, state and local authority. CONTRACTOR will obtain all necessary certificates, permits and licenses at CONTRACTOR'S sole expense arid, upon request, provide the CITY with evidence thereof. 1.1.16 Maintain a general liability insurance policy with a contract liability rider of $2,000,000 annual aggregate and $1,000,000 per occurrence. The CITY shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. 2. CITY OBLIGATIONS 2.1 The CITY agrees to provide and furnish the CONTRACTOR the following: 2.1.1 Information required by the CONTRACTOR to properly bill the accounts. Information shall be in the form of legible EMS Patient Care Reports (PCRs) or typewritten information taken from the EMS - PCR. Legible information shall be required from electronic as well as paper information. 2.1.2 THE CITY shall provide the CONTRACTOR with hospital admission face sheets and other information, including patient signatures, which may be available and legally obtainable for individuals receiving ambulance service when necessary for billing purposes. 2.1.3 The CITY shall provide the CONTRACTOR with information that is necessary regarding collection for accounts that remain delinquent after the CONTRACTOR has provided billing services. -2- 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES 3.1 The CITY agrees to pay for services performed by the CONTRACTOR as follows: 3.1.1 The charge of $ 26.50 per each billable transport run. 3.2 The CONTRACTOR shall invoice the CITY on a monthly basis for services rendered and payment of each invoice shall be due within 30 days of the date of the invoice. 4. TERM, DEFAULT, AND TERMINATION 4.1 This agreement shall be effective on the d_ ate first mentioned above and shall extend through and including December 31, 2015, unless terminated prior to that date pursuant to this Article Four. In addition, the agreement may be extended through December 31, 2016 at the same rate of $26.50 per billable run, if notice of extension is given to CONTRACTOR by 11/1/2015. 4.2 If any, one or more of the following occurs: (1) a payment due from CITY to CONTRACTOR shall be and remain unpaid in whole or in part for more than sixty (60) days after same is due and payable; (2) CITY shall violate or default on any of the other covenant agreements, stipulations or conditions herein and such violation or default shall continue for a period of ten (10) days after written notice from CONTRACTOR of such violation or default; then it shall be optional for CONTRACTOR, without further demand or notice; to declare this agreement forfeited and the said Term ended and CONTRACTOR shall not be liable for damages by reason of such termination; but notwithstanding termination by CONTRACTOR, the liability of CITY for the payments provided herein shall not be relinquished or extinguished for the services provided prior to termination. CITY shall be responsible for, in addition to the payments agreed to. be paid hereunder, reasonable,attorneys' fees and costs incurred by CONTRACTOR to enforce the provisions of this Agreement or to collect the payments due CONTRACTOR hereunder. 4.3 Each right -or remedy of CONTRACTOR provided for in this agreement shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other right or remedy provided for in this agreement now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. 4.4 CONTRACTOR shall not be deemed to be in default under this agreement until CITY has given CONTRACTOR written notice specifying the nature of the default and CONTRACTOR does not cure such default within (30) days after receipt of such notice or within such reasonable time thereafter as may be necessary to cure such default where such default is of such a character as to reasonably require more than thirty (30) days to cure. 4.5 No waiver of any default of CITY hereunder shall be implied from any omission to take any action on account of such default if such default persists or is repeated, and no express waiver shall affect any default other than the default specified in the express waiver and that only for the time and to the extent therein -3- stated. One or more waivers by CONTRACTOR shall not be construed as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same covenant, term or condition. 5. INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Each party agrees that it shall protect, indemnify and hold harmless from and against all liabilities, -actions, damages, claims, demands, judgment, losses, costs, expenses, suits or actions and attorneys' fees, and shall defend the other in any suit, including appeals, for loss or damage to property caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, its agents or employees, in connection with or as a result of this agreement, the performance of either party's obligations hereunder or the performance of services governed by this agreement. Neither party shall be required to reimburse, defend or indemnify the other party for loss or claim due to the negligence of such other party. In case of joint or concurrent negligence of the parties giving rise to a loss or claim against either one or both, each shall have full rights of contribution against the other. 5.2 Each party shall promptly notify the other party of the assertion of any claim against which the party is indemnified by the other party. 6. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1 Nothing in this agreement is intended or shall be construed to create an employer - employee relationship, a partnership, a joint venture, or a lessor - lessee relationship between the parties. 6.2 Each party understands and agrees that it is responsible for payment of the wages, salaries and benefits of its own employees and that the other party shall not pay or withhold any sums for income tax, unemployment insurance, workers compensation premiums, social security or any other withholding required by law or any other agreement. 6.3 This agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 6.4 This agreement may be amended or modified only in writing and signed by both parties. 6.5 This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the CITY and the CONTRACTOR and their respective successors and assigns. 6.6 This agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute only one agreement. 6.7 Any notice required or permitted under this agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given or served if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: -4- If to CONTRACTOR to: Expert T. Billing, Attn: Bill Schommer, 400 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 If to CITY to: City of Edina 4801 W 50 "' St Edina, MN 55424 CONTRACTOR and CITY shall each have the right from time to time to change the place notice is to be given under this paragraph by written notice thereof to the other party. 6.8 If any term or provision of this agreement shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder shall not be affected thereby, and each other term and provision of this agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. No receipts or acceptance by CONTRACTOR from CITY of less than the monthly payments herein stipulated shall be deemed to be other than a partial payment on account for any due and unpaid amounts; no endorsement or statement of any check or any letter or other writing accompanying any check or payment of rent to CONTRACTOR shall be deemed an,accord and satisfaction, and CONTRACTOR may accept and negotiate such check or payment without prejudice to CONTRACTOR's rights to (i) recover the remaining balance of such unpaid amounts or (ii) pursue any other remedy provided in this agreement. Time is of the essence with respect to the due performance of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained. 6.9 HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE ADDENDUM The attached HIPAA Business Associate Addendum is incorporated herein in order to satisfy the requirements of the final and /or amended regulations in compliance with the privacy regulations pursuant to Public Law 104 -191 of August 21, 1996, known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this agreement to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer or other 'representatives on this day of , 2014. CITY OF EDINA By: EXPERT T BILLING LM Bill Schommer Its: Its: President IM Its: 5.2 e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE DE �• IN EXCESS O F $20,000/CHANGE OR R To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: December 16, 2014 Agenda Item #: IV. F. The Recommended.Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Authorize Engineering Services for Arden Park D Neighborhood - Bid Documents and Construction Phase Services Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: December 10, 2014 . NA Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH), Inc. $821,866.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. $821,866.00 General Information: The Arden Park D Neighborhood is scheduled for reconstruction in 2015. The project was approved by City Council at the public hearing on Dec. 9. The project will include new bituminous pavement and curb and gutter; sidewalks on Arden Avenue, West 52 ^d Street, and on Minnehaha Blvd adjacent to a 24 -ft curb -to- curb street.width; 27 -ft curb -to -curb street width on streets without sidewalks while parking will be restricted to one side of all streets; and upgrades to utility infrastructure including storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water and City -owned street lights. The project implements Living Streets elements which is shaping our thinking about the use of our streets from primarily auto - centric to a multi -modal transportation system that serves all users. If the City is billed for this entire amount combined with the preliminary engineering services, the total fee would be approximately 19.3% of the estimated construction cost. Typical industry standards for engineering services as a percentage of construction range from 15% to 25 %. This proposal is within industry standards for a project of this scale. We will gain some efficiency by combining this project with the 54th Street project. The project is funded by a combination of special assessments,.City Utility and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety funds. Some storm water improvements will be funded by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Staff recommends approving the attached engineering proposal with SEH. Attachment: • Engineering Proposal G:\MCENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA412 Arden Park D(2015)\ADMIN \MISC\Item IV. F. RFP Eng. Svcs.docx i City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • ,Edina, MN 55424 SEH Building a Better World for All of Use SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT December 10, 2014 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: RE: City of Edina Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA -412 SEH No. EDINA128385 10.00 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) has enjoyed assisting the City with the preliminary engineering for the referenced project. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to present this supplemental letter agreement for bid document and construction phase services in the Arden Park D neighborhood. If accepted, this supplemental letter agreement describes how we will provide these services for a not -to- exceed fee of $821,866.00. This amount is detailed in the attached Task Hour Budget (THB) and includes all reimbursable expenses. We will bill the City monthly for reimbursable expenses and on an hourly basis for labor. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. We understand this project will be combined with the 54th Street Roadway Reconstruction project for bidding and construction. The City intends to do this in order to gain efficiencies and cost savings since the projects are directly adjacent to one another. We agree with this strategy and have tailored the construction phase portion our proposal to account for this project integration. We estimate that our services are at least 10% less than they would be if this was a stand -alone project. For your reference, if we bill the City for this work and combine the already completed preliminary engineering services, our total fee would be approximately 19.3% of the estimated construction cost of $5.8 million. Our anticipated project production schedule is given in the following table. We've accelerated our level of effort in order for the City to conduct a bid opening in February 2015. This way, the City can try to take advantage of presenting the project to street reconstruction contractors early in the 2015 bidding season in an attempt to receive more competitive bids. Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Mr. Chad Millner, PE December 10, 2014 Page 2 Work Item Work Item No. Work Item Description Work Item Key Milestone Date 1 Begin Bidding Documents December 17, 2014 2 Begin Advertising for Bids January 28, 2015 3 Open Bids February 19, 2015 4 Award Construction Contract March 3, 2015 5 Begin Construction Aril 2015 6 Substantially Complete Construction November 2015 7 Begin Spring Punchlist/Warranty Work May 2016 8 Final Assessment Hearing September 2016 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. Thank you again for considering SEH for this project. Please contact me at 952.912.2616 or tmuse sehinc.com with questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. WWQ—., TJMu PE P roject Manager Enclosures c: Paul Pasko, SEH (without Enclosures) p:\ae\e\edina\ 128385 \1 - gent \10- setupconlract \10.03 - proposal\bid dots and cpsVnl prop Itr arden park 12 1014.docx Accepted on this _day of , 2014 City of Edina, Minnesota By: Name -A SEH Task Hour Budget City of Edina Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -412 December 10, 2014 Page 1 of 5 PROJECT TASKS ESTIMATED COST BID DOCUMENT SERVICES 1.0 Finalize Street / Pavement Design 1.1 Finalize design (1) (2) (3) (4) (27) Subtotal Labor Cost $22,734 2.0 Finalize Drainage / Storm Sewer Desi n 2.1 Storm Sewer Extensions and New System Design (5) (6) (7) (8) Subtotal Labor Cost $12,738 3.0 Finalize Sanitary Sewer Design 3.1 Finalize Design 9 Subtotal Labor Cost $7,173 4.0 Finalize Water Main Design 4.1 Finalize Design (10) Subtotal Labor Cost $22,537 5.0 Finalize Li htin Design 5.1 Finalize Design Subtotal Labor Cost $6,324 6.0 Bid Document Preparation 46 6.1 Plan sheets 6.1.1 Title Sheet 6.1.2 General Layout 6.1.3 Suggested Staging Plan 6.1.4 Tabulation of earthwork 6.1.5 Tabulation of existing sanitary and storm sewer structure reconstruction or adjustment 6.1.6 Tabulation of existing sanitary sewer trunk pipe joint or spot repairs 6.1.7 Tabulation of removals and miscellaneous restoration 6.1.8 Typical pavement sections & List of Standard Plates 6.1.9 Signing Tabulation and Plan 6.1.10 Typical Utility Service Construction Limits 6.1.11 Sanitary Sewer CIPP Overview Plan 6.1.12 Watermain and Service Reconstruction Overview Plan 6.1.13 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Reconstruction Plan 6.1.14 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 6.1.15 Plan and Profile sheets 11 12 13 6.1.16 Cross Section sheets 14 6.2 1 Project Manual 6.2.1 Front End 15 6.2.2 Bidding Requirements 16 Page 1 of 5 Page 2 of 5 PROJECT TASKS ESTIMATED COST 6.2.3 Conditions of Contract 6.2.4 Specifications 46 6.2.5 Special Provisions 6.2.6 Appendix 17 Subtotal Labor Cost $103,801 7.0 Quantities and Opinion of Probable Cost 28 46 7.1 Refine Opinion of Probable Cost and Proposal Form from Engineering Stud 18 7.1.1 Streets 7.1.2 Storm Sewer 7.1.3 Sanitary sewer 7.1.4 Water Main Subtotal Labor Cost $11,996 8.0 Agency Review / Submittals 8.1 City of Edina 19 8.1.1 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Reconstruction Communications 48 8.2 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 20 52 8.2.1 Grading and Earthmovin Permit 21 8.3 Hydraulic Modeling 8.3.1 Review Existing Base Model - Compare to Current MCWD Model (49) 8.3.2 Update Base Model with Atlas 14 Data (50) 8.3.3 Establish new Base Flood Elevations (51) 8.3.4 Add Proposed Fill, Determine BFE impacts (if any) 8.3.5 QA/QC 8.4 Permitting Tasks 8.4.1 Calculate Compensatory Storage Requirements 8.4.2 IDetermine Mitigation Site 8.4.3 Prepare Compensatory Storage Figures 8.4.4 Prepare Technical Memorandum 8.4.5 Initial MCWD Coordination 8.4.6 MCWD Permit Coordination /Comments 8.4.7 MnDNR Permit Coordination /Comments 8.4.8 USACE Permit Coordination /Comments 8.4.9 QA/QC 8.5 Private Utility Companies 8.6 MPCA 8.6.1 NPDES PermiUSWPPP 22 Subtotal Labor Cost $25,401 9.0 [Meetings 9.1 With City Staff 9.1.1 Review 90% Plan set Meeting Subtotal Labor Cost $2,414 10.0 Bidding Assistance 23 10.1 Pre are Ad for Bids 10.2 Prepare Electronic Bid Documents 24 10.2.1 Plans 10.2.1 Project Manual 10.3 Respond to Bid Inquires 10.4 Prepare necessary Addenda 10.5 Attend Bid Opening 10.6 Prepare Tabulation of Bids Page 2 of 5 P:WE\E\Edina \128385\1 -genl\10 - setup- contract\10.03proposaKBid dots and CPSgSEH THB Arden Park Bid Const Council.xlsx]THB NOTES 1 Horizontal alignments and stationing will be assigned to all streets in the project area. 2 Vertical alignments will be assigned to all streets in the project area. Wherever possible, the profile of the existing pavement will be held constant. 3 Create intersection grading plans. These plans will not appear in the bid document plan set. Instead they will be utilized in the field by SEH surveyors staking the reconstruction. 4 Tabulation of earthwork for insertion into the bid documents. Includes information on a per street basis regarding gross common excavation, reclaim aggregate base production and placement, imported class 5 aggregate base, subgrade repairs, paving, topsoil borrow, and sodding. 5 Complete the detailed design of both storm sewer extensions and /or new systems shown in the Engineering Study. 6 Repairs or replacements of existing storm sewer structures and pipes are based on recommendations from City staff and the structure condition surveys completed by SEH staff during its field inspection operations. 7 Complete the detailed design of the sump pump drain pipe shown in the feasibility study. Place the sump pump drain pipe behind the concrete curb and gutter using open cut or HDD methods. Sump pump drain pipe may need to be proposed in a position in front of the curb and gutter at select locations. Page 3 of 5 PROJECT TASKS ESTIMATED COST 10.7 Print paper copies of plans and project manual 25 $228,874.95 Subtotal SEH Expenses 26 $4,229.96 Subtotal Labor Cost $13,757 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 11.0 $575,756.03 Subtotal SEH Expenses 26 Construction Staking Subtotal 11.1 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $821,866.00 Provide Construction Staking Services 29 43 Subtotal Labor Cost $102,303 12.0 RPR 12.1 Provide RPR Services 30 31 33 42 47 Subtotal Labor Cost $382,815 13.0 Construction Administration 13.1 Construction Administration 32 34 35 36 37 46 13.2 Provide As -built Drawings and Service Information 41 44 45 13.3 Prepare Final Assessment Roll in August 2016 13.4 1 lAssessment Hearin 40 Subtotal Labor Cost $90,638 P:WE\E\Edina \128385\1 -genl\10 - setup- contract\10.03proposaKBid dots and CPSgSEH THB Arden Park Bid Const Council.xlsx]THB NOTES 1 Horizontal alignments and stationing will be assigned to all streets in the project area. 2 Vertical alignments will be assigned to all streets in the project area. Wherever possible, the profile of the existing pavement will be held constant. 3 Create intersection grading plans. These plans will not appear in the bid document plan set. Instead they will be utilized in the field by SEH surveyors staking the reconstruction. 4 Tabulation of earthwork for insertion into the bid documents. Includes information on a per street basis regarding gross common excavation, reclaim aggregate base production and placement, imported class 5 aggregate base, subgrade repairs, paving, topsoil borrow, and sodding. 5 Complete the detailed design of both storm sewer extensions and /or new systems shown in the Engineering Study. 6 Repairs or replacements of existing storm sewer structures and pipes are based on recommendations from City staff and the structure condition surveys completed by SEH staff during its field inspection operations. 7 Complete the detailed design of the sump pump drain pipe shown in the feasibility study. Place the sump pump drain pipe behind the concrete curb and gutter using open cut or HDD methods. Sump pump drain pipe may need to be proposed in a position in front of the curb and gutter at select locations. Page 3 of 5 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY BID DOCUMENT SERVICES Subtotal Labor Cost $228,874.95 Subtotal SEH Expenses 26 $4,229.96 Subtotal $233,104.91 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Subtotal Labor Cost $575,756.03 Subtotal SEH Expenses 26 $13,005.07 Subtotal $588,761.10 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $821,866.00 P:WE\E\Edina \128385\1 -genl\10 - setup- contract\10.03proposaKBid dots and CPSgSEH THB Arden Park Bid Const Council.xlsx]THB NOTES 1 Horizontal alignments and stationing will be assigned to all streets in the project area. 2 Vertical alignments will be assigned to all streets in the project area. Wherever possible, the profile of the existing pavement will be held constant. 3 Create intersection grading plans. These plans will not appear in the bid document plan set. Instead they will be utilized in the field by SEH surveyors staking the reconstruction. 4 Tabulation of earthwork for insertion into the bid documents. Includes information on a per street basis regarding gross common excavation, reclaim aggregate base production and placement, imported class 5 aggregate base, subgrade repairs, paving, topsoil borrow, and sodding. 5 Complete the detailed design of both storm sewer extensions and /or new systems shown in the Engineering Study. 6 Repairs or replacements of existing storm sewer structures and pipes are based on recommendations from City staff and the structure condition surveys completed by SEH staff during its field inspection operations. 7 Complete the detailed design of the sump pump drain pipe shown in the feasibility study. Place the sump pump drain pipe behind the concrete curb and gutter using open cut or HDD methods. Sump pump drain pipe may need to be proposed in a position in front of the curb and gutter at select locations. Page 3 of 5 8 Tabulate existing manhole or catch basin reconstruction or adjustment for inclusion in the bid document plan set. 9 Tabulate trunk pipe joint or spot repairs and manhole reconstruction /adjustments for insertion in bid document plan set. 10 Includes incorporation of recommended trunk water main rehabilitation techniques including open -cut, pipe bursting, and HDD or combination thereof. 11 Task includes adding the private utility line work to the base mapping. 12 Include street centerline profiles for all streets. Include profiles of existing public utilities only when proposed public utility work can interfere with the existing utilities. 13 Plan view base mapping is based on line work from topographic surveying. No aerial photos will be included on the bidding documents. 14 Cross section plan sheets will be created for streets where curb and gutter is proposed. 15 Contains title sheet, certification sheet, table of contents, contact sheet, instructions to bidders, and advertisement for bids. 16 Includes proposal form, instructions to bidders, and advertisement for bids 17 Contains soil boring data, City standard plates, and SEH construction details. 18 Use same applicable cost splits shown in the Engineering Study. 19 Includes one (1) submittal of draft final bidding documents to the City in 11x17 format. 20 The entire project area is located in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and will not result in a net increase in impervious surfaces. 21 SEH will prepare one (1) submittal letter transmitting review documents to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 22 Includes having SEH water resources staff review the SWPPP prior to submitting to the MPCA. 23 Does not include a pre -bid meeting. 24 Bid documents will be available for purchase via Quest CDN on the City's web site. 25 Print only enough copies for appropriate City and SEH staff. 26 Reimbursable expenses during bid documents includes mileage and printing costs. Reimbursable expenses during construction include printing, auto allowances, mileage, and survey equipment. 27 Tree removal shall only become necessary in extreme circumstances of reconstruction where no other feasible option exists to mitigate damage caused by reconstruction activities. 28 Quantity calculations will be captured in a XLSX file that will be incorporated into the proposal form as part of the bidding document project manual and monthly pay applications utilized during reconstruction to track quantities and costs for each City funding source allocated for the project. 29 Includes hours to verify the control used by the City for the topographic survey and /or set new control if needed. 30 SEH will use the City's format for a Daily Construction Report. 31 This task assumes that the City will secure material inspection services and make these services available to SEH. 32 SEH will copy, fold, and provide the mailing labels for any update newsletters. City staff will insert these updates into envelopes, attach the mailing label and postage and send the updates from City Hall. 33 SEH will provide 1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 4/13/15 and 4/17/15 (1 week), 2 RPR's for 50 hours per week between 4/20/15 and 10/30/15 (28 weeks), 1 RPR for 40 hours per week between 11/2/15 and 12/11/15 (6 weeks), 1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 12/14/15 and 12/31/15 (3 weeks), and 1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 4/25/15 and 7/8/15 (11 weeks). 34 For each Application for Payment (AFP) SEH will use its format for tracking monthly quantities per City funding source, the City's format for the cover sheet of the AFP, and the SEH format for the AFP's subsequent pages. 35 Assumes preparation of five (5) resident update newsletters. One newsletter will be distributed after the award of the project and two (2) newsletters per each stage of the project to the entire neighborhood. 36 Task includes scheduling and conducting a pre- construction meeting, preparing and sending the City minutes of pre - construction meeting for distribution, attending weekly on site progress meetings, preparing and sending the City minutes of those meetings for distribution, preparing applications for payments, preparing any necessary change orders, and the preparation of as -built drawings. 37 Not Used 38 Not Used 39 Not Used Page 4 of 5 40 Other than preparing the final assessment roll and providing technical backup during the hearing itself, SEH will not provide any other services for the assessment hearing. 41 As -built drawing requirements concerning labeling, required data, and submittal materials will follow the City of Edina record drawing procedure. 42 RPR duties include taking digital photographs of every water service and sanitary sewer service reconstruction at the corp stop, curb stop, sanitary wye, and connection point with the existing sanitary sewer service. Shown in each digital photograph will be a time /date stamp and a dry erase board labeled with the specific address. 43 Includes hours to gather as -built information. 44 SEH will submit a .xlsx spreadsheet titled "Summary of Private Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Pipe Reconstruction ", with column labels matching the assessment roll and additional columns detailing the information gathered for each sanitary sewer and water service pipe by the Edina Building Department and during construction by SEH. 45 As -built information will be provided to the City by December 11, 2015. As built information will include as built plansheets in pdf format, spreadsheet of XYZ locates, AutoCAD file of proposed utilities line work and XYZ locates, spreadsheet titled "Summary of Private Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Pipe Reconstruction ", copies of Edina Building Department sanitary sewer and water service pipe reconstruction notes, SEH sanitary sewer and water service pipe reconstruction notes, and the digital photographs for each address of the sanitary sewer service and water service pipes detailed above. 46 Includes incorporation of 54th Street Roadway Reconstruction Project plans, specifications and quantities to the Bidding Documents. 47 This task includes time for a walkthrough of the project with City staff following substantial completion. 48 SEH will prepare a newsletter mailing to property owners providing a project update and outlining the private sanitary sewer service pipe reconstruction program. The newsletter will contain graphics and descriptions of acceptable reconstruction methods, the schedule to complete the work and discussion regarding proposed assessments. Task includes printing, folding and delivering newsletters to Public Works; and preparations of mailing labels. Task assumes City staff will insert newsletters into envelopes and mail from Public Works. 49 Assumes use of only XPSWMM software. 50 Assumes base model will not be required to reflect Atlas 14 Data based on conversations with MCWD on 12/1/14. We understand the MCWD will be recognizing Atlas 14 data on January 1, 2015. 51 Reflects updated Atlas 14 Data. . 52 A portion of Minnehaha Boulevard and Arden Park are within the 100 year floodplain. An existing wetland is also present within Arden Park. Both floodplain and wetland impact and mitigation coordination will be required with the Watershed District in order to receive approved permits. Page 5 of 5 i r To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: December 16, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2014 Cn �sss Agenda Item #: IV. G. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2014. Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the November 5, 2014 Traffic Safety Committee Report at their November 20 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: • Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2014 • Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of November 20, 2014 GA WICENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIATraff c Safety Committeel0ty Council Reports1201411tem IV. G. Traffic Safety Report of November 5, 2014.doat City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Traffic Safety Committee Report Wednesday, November 5th, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on November 05. The City Engineer, a Police Sergeant, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Planning representative, and the Director of Public Works were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the November 20 Edina Transportation Commission and the December 16 City Council agenda. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action Al. Request for reduction in speeds and clarity on 'where lanes are present on Edina Industrial Boulevard This request was reopened by a business owner at Metro Boulevard and Edina Industrial Boulevard. The requestor. states that high speeds are common along Edina Industrial Boulevard from 78th Street to Metro Boulevard, with many people using the street as if it were four -lanes Photo: Edina Industrial Boulevard, looking east wide instead of two. This request had previously been considered a D item due to possible resurfacing and restriping the road at that time. The resurfacing is no longer planned. A radar study was performed on Edina Industrial Blvd s and it was found that the 85th- percentile speed ' "I_ was 38 mph . eastbound, with top speeds exceeding 50 mph. The road is 42.5 feet wide in Map : Edina Industrial Boulevard 2 lane segment this location, with no parking on either side having 21 foot wide driving lanes in each direction. This segment is designated to be a future primary bicycling route. After review, staff recommends striping shoulder lanes ( "fog lines ") in each direction on Edina Industrial Boulevard in order to delineate where the road narrows to one lane in each direction. This work is anticipated to be completed in the spring of 2015. _..__._.... ... ... _... ...... - ._ . .. ...... ....__.... _. _- ..._._- _ -.. ...._._...._.._ - _..--- .._.._._... _. 1 Page A2. Request for a reduction in traffic speeds on Wooddale at 60th Street The requestor originally asked for a stop sign to control speeds on Wooddale. When the requestor was informed that such a request would not be approved due to city policy the request was altered to be for a speed study on Wooddale and to see if any traffic calming measures could be done. Weekday 85th_ percentile speed was 33.8 mph; weekend 851h_ percentile speeds exceeded 35 mph. Wooddale is a dedicated bike route with sharrows. Wooddale has a weekday volume of 3570 AADT, sidewalk on one side, and a width of 32 feet. After review staff recommends enforcement in this location. Photo : Wooddale at 60'", looking north Map and Wooddale 2 Page Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends denial. B1. Request for a "Curve Ahead" sign on Lincoln Drive This request concerns a slight curve on Lincoln Drive. The requestor feels that the corner is not apparent and should have a warning sign to prevent drivers from driving off the road, particularly at night. The curve is very slight, and has a design speed of 43 mph according to AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) guidelines. Other curves in this area, have warning signs, however they are much sharper curves. Lincoln Drive has 2733 AADT and an 85th- percentile speed of 38.3 mph north of the curve. Mop: The Lincoln drive curve in question After review staff. recommends denial of this request. This decision was based on the speed limit at this location, and design speed of the curve. B2. Request for signs to direct parking from Gleason Court to the Bredesen Park parking lot The requestor states that it is common for the entryway to Gleason Court to be filled with parked cars, and that these cars are not visitors to neighbors but are using the cul -de -sac as an alternative to the parking lot for Bredesen Park. The requestor also noted that he did not believe parking in the cul -de -sac overall to be an issue and did not wish to restrict parking near the entry for residents or guests. In site visits, few vehicles have been seen parked along this area, and none were close enough to influence turning into the cul -de -sac from Gleason Road. Gleason Court is about thirty feet wide along its entire length. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. This decision was based on the width of the roadway in this location, and to avoid sign clutter. The requestor was further informed that he may report anyone parked within thirty feet of the intersection. Nair „ %•,.`' Map Photo : Vehicle parked near entrvwav Entrance to Gleason Ct. off Gleason Rd. .... ....... ....__. __ __ - ....... -- — - - -- - -- 3 Page B3. Request for stop sign on Alden at Morningside This request comes from a resident on Morningside, who believes that drivers speed down Alden and turn onto Morningside at high speed. This makes it difficult for the requestor to back out of the driveway of the residence the requestor occupies. The request for a stop sign was seen as a solution to allow for larger gaps for leaving the driveway. Other solutions were also proposed, and were seen as able to help the scenario, such as bringing the trash cans further into the driveway. A preconstruction count along Alden showed an AADT of 257 and an 85th = percentile speed of 22.3 mph. There are no reported accidents in this location. Warrants for stop Map : Traffic Control in the area signs are attached in appendix A. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. This decision was due to not meeting warrants for a stop sign. Photo: Alden at Morningside, looking north B4. Request for prohibition on using driveways as U -Turns in the city, discourage use of a specific driveway The requestor states that many people turn around in her driveway, which is the 3rd off of a major roadway on a side street. In the request.it was stated that many people pull their entire vehicles into the .driveway, just to back out into a three -point turn. Requestor further asked if placing a cone or trash bin in the center of her driveway would be acceptable to the city, and called back to report people had been getting out of their cars and moving the obstruction to turn around in the driveway. The requestor was also curious as to any other steps that may be taken to reduce the amount of U -Turns in the driveway. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. When she asked, the requestor was informed that it is not illegal for her to continue to obstruct her driveway. 41 Page B5. Request for lowering the speed limit and for traffic calming on Tracy Avenue, at Brook Dr. The requestor states that cars often drive very quickly down this street, and the requestor is concerned about the children boarding buses for school. A 2013 count found that the 85th_ percentile speed in this location along Tracy was 30.7 mph, with a volume of 1667 AADT. There is no sidewalk along Tracy in this location; however it is on the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map. Tracy Ave. is 30 feet wide. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. This decision was based primarily on speeds only slightly over the speed limit. Photo : Tracy at Brook, looking north Map: Tracy and Brook 5 1 P a g e Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends more study C1. Request for a "No Right Turn on Red" restriction on Cecelia Circle/ Delaney Boulevard at 781h Street This request comes from a property owner on 78th Street, who says tenants in the building have trouble turning out of the driveway due to Cecelia traffic turning right on red, removing gaps. A gap study was performed, and during evening rush hour left turns would have been restricted such that acceptable gaps would not be present for 5 minutes. However, this lack of gaps was not due to right on red, but instead due to the queue from the light at 78th and Cahill blocking the property's driveway. When vehicles were exiting the driveway, vehicles in the queue were courteous and allowed exiting vehicles to turn. After review, staff recommends further study of this location. This will include a study of the intersection of Cahill Road and 78th Street, as well as further counts of right turns from Cecelia Circle. C2. Request for mitigation of drive -thru queue on Arcadia, from Starbucks The requestor states that the Starbucks' drive - thru queue consistently is Ion g enough for cars to be stopped on city streets, both Arcadia and Gus Young Lane. The requestor feels that this is an issue because the road is not wide enough for queued cars to be passed on their side of the centerline, and this leads to drivers crossing a double yellow line, violating expectations from drivers. In site visits queues were present in both directions, with both left- turning (northbound) and right- turning (southbound) queues appearing on their respective right hand sides of the roadway. In discussions with property management and Starbucks management, it was made clear that they were aware of the issue and had exhausted all their possibilities in dealing with the situation. Arcadia has 1186 AADT just ,�� r°w- � FYI u - t►1 �'� � r.,,,y�(. 9i r i �' ,7�' r c - ���• , Map 78th Street, between Cecelia and Cahill Photo : Street, looking east from Cecelia Photo : Arcadia, looking south Map: Queuing along Arcadia ..- .-- ...._... _.__... ... .......... .-_ 6 Page north of this location, and Gus Young Lane has 4275 AADT in this location, with 85th- percentile speeds of 20 and 22 mph respectively. Arcadia in this location is 29.5 feet wide. After review, staff initially recommended increased police enforcement and ticketing any driver who is illegally passing. Further consideration by police department staff and by the Edina Transportation Commission resulted in the item being recommended for further investigation. C3. Request for clarification for "When Children Are Present," placards around Cornelia School, and enforcement of speed limits This request concerns drivers who may be driving unsafely around Cornelia School due to confusion with the reduced speed limits when "Children Are Present ". An Edina Police Sergeant has explained when children are present as "... if children are arriving or leaving school during opening or closing hours, or during recess periods, then children are considered present"'. Recent counts in the area suggest that the speed limit without these restrictions is being obeyed, with 85th- percentile speeds below 30 mph on weekdays; however speeds at specific times and the presence of children were unavailable data points. After review, staff initially recommended not placing additional signage at this location. However, clarification of "When Children Are Present" was communicated with the requestor Map: Cornelia School and police will continue to monitor the area. The Edina Transportation Commission recommended the item for further study, (i.e. how often tickets are given for speeding in school zones, the effectiveness of school zones, moving signs signifying end of school zone, and other further study). Photo: Sign on Cornelia 1 Harlow, Tim. Star Tribune, "The Drive: If children present, rules on speed zones rule ". April 7th, 2014. Accessed online at http:// www. startribune .com /local/254114111.html, October 31St 71 Page D Items: Other Traffic Safety Issues Handled D1. Business along Lincoln Drive requested advice on better strategies for public safety to find and access their building. The Traffic Safety Coordinator and Fire Marshal reviewed the current signage and found that it was compliant with regulations. A monument was suggested as a possibility to increase visibility. D2. Resident noted that during repaving, in pavement lights along the Promenade at Hazelton were partially obstructed or paved over. Pictures were taken of the issue, and were sent to the Streets Supervisor for cleaning. D3. Further study of Valley View Road speeds, east of Tracy was requested. The study found that the mitigation installed earlier in the year was having little effect on speeds, with the 85th- percentile speeds of 38 mph. Police already patrol heavily in this area, and the "Your speed. is..." trailer was placed at this location. D4. This request was for trimming of neighbor's trees and plantings along Parkwood Road that have grown into the street and obstruct the view from the driveway. The request was forwarded to the city forester. D5. A request was received to investigate the light timing of Valley view Road and 66th Street. Electricians informed the Traffic Safety Coordinator that the light was running on a fixed cycle as the new actuation technology was installed. The light is now back to actuated timings. D6. A request was received for adding a signal to York at Parklawn Avenue to facilitate left turns. This request was forwarded to Hennepin County who controls signals along York, and they are investigating. We have a traffic study that details when. 81 Page Appendix A Stop Sign Warrants, Edina City Policy 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a stop sign, a residential intersection should be left uncontrolled. 4. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 5. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 6. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 7. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 8. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 9. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. State Warrants Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C. Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach; and E. Reported crash experience. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right - of -way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and /or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; 91 Page B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right -of -way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and /or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right -of -way at the intersection under the normal right -of -way rule have been reported within a 3 -year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 213.8 and 26.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor - street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions:' A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and /or C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12 -month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. Such crashes include right -angle collisions involving road users on the minor - street approach failing to yield the right -of -way to traffic on the through street or highway. 10 1 Page MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM NOVEMBER 20, 2014 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Olson, Rummel, Spanhake and Whited. ABSENT Member lyer. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Whited to amend the meeting agenda to add new Item B. Sgt. Tim Olson. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 23.2014 Motion was made by member Olsen and seconded by member Janovy to approve the amended minutes of October 23, 2014. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None. Traffic Safety Committee Report of November S. 2015 A.I. Planner Nolan said this item is moving to Section C for further study. B.2. This item was moved to Section C for the following reasons: a. Review locations of 'Speed Zone Ends Here' signs to make sure they include all of the school property; b. Clarify the meaning of "When Children Are Present;" c. Check on the number of citations issued for the past year for violation of school speed zone. Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to revise the Nov. 5 report by moving A.1 and B.2 to Section C for further study and forward the revised report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. To: Members Of Edina City Council From: Tim Barnes, City Facility Manager-TTg t3� o Le ` 4 r 0 ��1iee© Agenda Item #: IV. H. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Cell Tower Lease Renewal at Creek Valley Park Communications Facility Action Requested: Approval of attached cell tower lease renewal with Crown Castle for T- Mobile site at Creek Valley Park. Information / Background: Creek Valley Park 6303 Gleason Road Edina 55424 The original lease with ATP Minneapolis Inc. (Original Tenant) was effective on August I, 1996. T- Mobile Central LLC acquired the rights to this site as a successor in interest to APT Minneapolis Inc. effective November 16, 2012 Thus far the City has had a successful owner /tenant relationship at this site. Crown Castle and T- Mobile Central LLC entered into an owner /management agreement for certain portions of T- Mobile's portfolio at the end of November 2012, assigning this tower location as part of that portfolio under Crown Castle. The lease agreement is due to expire at the end of December 2014 and Crown Castle has expressed an interest in renewal and continuance of this lease agreement with the City of Edina. *City staff engaged in a process of negotiation that resulted in an agreement for 100% of any additional property space to be solely the income of the City (the tower is the property of the tenant). *We also negotiated a 2 % increase in the Annual escalation amounts based on Consumer Price Index numbers. *The City also realized that we have a rental rate on this contract that was lower than other municipalities and we were able to see a 10% starting lease rate increase. •There is also a $5,000.00 signing bonus associated with this lease agreement, to be used for the removal of equipment upon lease termination by either party. *This agreement is set to the term of 5 years, with 4 additional 5 year terms. *This lease includes both of the original and additional amendments that have been agreed upon by the City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 City. Any additional language has been under the review of Attorney John Kelly of the Campbell Knutson Professional Association and City staff. Therefore after review the City Staff recommends that the City of Edina renews the lease at this location. Site Name: Edina (Creek Valley) Business Unit #: 823886 LEASE FOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY AGREEMENT (Renewal) by and between CITY OF ED. INA and T- MOBILE USA TOWER LLC Dated as of January 1, 2015 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 1766670 Site Name: Edina,(Creek Valley) Business Unit #: 823886 LEASE FOR COMMUNICATION FACILITY AGREEMENT enewal This Lease for Communication Facility Agreement ( "Lease ") is entered into as of January 1, 2015, by and - between the CITY OF. EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Landlord "), whose address is 4801 West 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and T- MOBILE USA TOWER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ("Tenant "), whose address is 12920 Southeast 38`h Street, Bellevue, WA .98006:.: Recitals WHEREAS, the Landlord is the owner of certain property located on Gleason Road in Edina, Minnesota 55424 known as "Creek Valley Park ", as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto '( "Property"); and WHEREAS, Landlord and ATP Minneapolis, Inc. ( "Original Tenant ") entered into a Lease for Communication Facility made and effective as of August 1, 1996 ( "Original Lease ") which Original Lease was amended as of December 31, 1996 pursuant to the First Amendment to Lease for Communication Facility ( "First Amendment of Lease ") and further amended on February 17, 1999 pursuant to the Second Amendment to Lease for Communication Facility ( "Second Amendment of Lease ") (the First Amendment of Lease and Second Amendment of Lease are hereinafter jointly referred to as "Amendments of Lease "), wherein Landlord leased nine hundred; square feet (900 sq. ft.) of space on the Property, as legally described on Exhibit "A" and depicted o.n the "Plot Plan" attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ( "Leased Premises") to Original Tenant for Original Tenant to install .a. seventy -five foot (75') monopole ( "Monopole ") with nine (9) antennas (" Antennas ") located thereon, for Original Tenant's communication equipment cabinets ("Tenant's Communication Equipment"), the Monopole, 1766670 1 Antennas and Original Tenant's Communication Equipment; located:within the Leased Premises, are hereinafter jointly referred to as "Tenant's Communication Facility"; and Landlord further granted to Original Tenant an easement over and under the Property as legally described in Exhibit "A" and shown on the Plot Plan ( "Access Easement") to allow Original Tenant to install, remove, replace, operate, maintain and repair Tenant's Communication Facility, including the running of electric lines and telephone lines and Tenant's Communication Equipment; and WHEREAS, T- Mobile Central, LLC ( "T- Mobile Central "), as successor in interest to the Original Tenant, assigned the Original Lease, as amended by the Amendments of Lease, to Tenant ,on November 26, 2012 pursuant to a "Memorandum of Assignment and Assumption Agreement" ( "Assignment of Lease'), wherein T- Mobile Central sold, conveyed, assigned and transferred T- Mobile Central's interest in the Original Lease, as amended by the Amendments of Lease, to Tenant and Tenant accepted the sale, conveyance and transfer of T- Mobile Central's interest in the Original Lease, as amended by the Amendments of Lease, and assumed and agreed to pay, perform and discharge all of the liabilities of T- Mobile Central under. the Original Lease; and WHEREAS, the Original Lease expires by its terms on December 31, 2014 and Tenant has requested that Landlord enter into a new.lease with Tenant effective as of January 1, 2015 for the "Leased Premises" so that Tenant may continue to use Tenant's'Communication Facility and i the non - exclusive Access Easement, as hereinafter defined; and WHEREAS, the Landlord is agreeable to leasing and does hereby agree to lease to the Tenant the Leased Premises so that Tenant may continue to use the Tenant's Communication Facility, the non- exclusive Access Easement over the Property -for Tenant's continued ingress and egress to the Leased Premises, along with the electric lines and telephone lines and related 1766670 2 equipment to Tenant's Equipment Cabinets (Utilities") subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration. of the foregoing Recitals, which,are incorporated herein as though they were set forth in the body hereof and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY AND PREMISES. Subject to the following terms and conditions, Landlord agrees to and hereby does lease to Tenant the Leased Premises for Tenant's use of the Monopole and related equipment and 'improvements for Tenant's Communication Facility, , subject to all other existing easements and leases for space on the Property together with the non- exclusive Access Easement for the, for ingress and egress -and for the Utilities on, .over and under the Property as legally described in Exhibit "A ". The primary purpose of Landlord's ownership of the Property is to operate a public park. 2. TERM. The initial term of this Lease shall be five (5) years ( "Initial Term "), commencing on January 1, 2015( "Commencement Date "). Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for four (4) additional five (5) year terms (each, a "Renewal Term ") subject to the terms of this Lease. The Renewal Terms of this Lease shall be on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein except for rental adjustments as provided, in Paragraph 3, Rent, below. This Lease -shall be automatically renewed for each of the Renewal Terms unless Tenant gives Landlord written notice -of Tenant's intention not to renew this Lease at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any applicable Renewal Term. 3. _ RENT AND ADDITIONAL COSTS AND EXPENSES: a. Tenant shall pay Landlord, as and for rent, the following sums at the time stated herein ( "Rent ") ": 176667v3 3 Based on Tenant's Communication:Facility currently located on the Property, the monthly rent on the Commencement Date of this Lease shall be One Thousand Six Hundred' Seventy -five and No /100 Dollars ($1,675:00) which monthly Rent shall be paid annually in advance on or before the first day of January of each year of this Lease, with the first such annual payment due on or before January 1, 2015: b. The Rent shall be increased each year on January 1st beginning on January 1, 2016, by an amount equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index ( "CPI ") as provided ,below. In no event shall the increase in Rent calculated for any one (1) year period of the Lease be less than three and one -half percent (3.5 %) or greater than five percent (5 %) of the Rent for the preceding year of the Lease. The Rent shall never be decreased. The CPI shall mean the "Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, All Cities, All Items `(1984 100)" as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or, if such index shall be discontinued, the successor index thereto or, if there shall be no successor index, such comparable index as shall be mutually agreed upon by the, parties. To determine the annual rental increase to be .paid by Tenant, the annual rental for the previous year shall' be multiplied by the percentage increase in the "unadjusted" CPI (not seasonally adjusted) for the twelve (12) month period ending in June of the previous year. Landlord shall be responsible for communicating all Rent increases to Tenant. C. If this Lease is terminated according to its terms, other than for termination of the Lease for nonpayment of Rent or other Tenant's default and Tenant has prepaid the Rent, the Tenant shall be entitled to a refund on a prorated basis, based on a thirty, day month, as of the date of termination of this Lease. 1766670 4 d. In addition to.kent, Tenant agrees to timely pay its pro rata share of any real estate taxes or personal property axes in lieu of real estate taxes required by any governmental body, having jurisdiction over the Property as a result of this Lease. e. Tenant shall pay a late fee of One Hundred Dollars. ($100.00) if the Rent is not paid within thirty (30) days of the due date. 4. GOVERNMENTAL "PROVAL APPROVAL CONTINGENCY. a. Approvals. Tenant's right to use,the Leased Premises and the Access Easement as provided in this Lease is expressly made contingent upon (i) Tenant's maintaining at Tenant's sole cost and:expense all the certificates; permits, zoning and other approvals that may required by any federal, state, or local authority for Tenant's use of the Leased Premises (individually, a "Governmental Approval" and collectively,.the "Governmental Approvals "); and (ii) Tenant complying with the terms and conditions of this Lease. Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in its efforts to obtain and/or retain all such Governmental Approvals and shall take. no action which. would adversely affect the status of the Leased Premises with respect to the Tenant's proposed use thereof. b. Interference Study. If in the future Landlord experiences interference with the_ Landlord's Police, Fire, Emergency Medical; Public Works (SCADA System) and Park's . Communications Systems ( "Landlord's Communication Systems ") and believes the interference to be from Tenant's Communication. Facility, Tenant' shall take immediate steps to correct the interference problem, afits cost and expense as provided in Paragraph 6(a) hereof. C. Non - approval. In the event that any Governmental Approval, necessary under 'Subparagraph 4a above is rejected or if any permit, license or Governmental Approval currently issued to Tenant is cancelled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by the applicable governmental authority so that Tenant, in its sole discretion, is unable to use the 1766670 5 i d. In addition to.kent, Tenant agrees to timely pay its pro rata share of any real estate taxes or personal property axes in lieu of real estate taxes required by any governmental body, having jurisdiction over the Property as a result of this Lease. e. Tenant shall pay a late fee of One Hundred Dollars. ($100.00) if the Rent is not paid within thirty (30) days of the due date. 4. GOVERNMENTAL "PROVAL APPROVAL CONTINGENCY. a. Approvals. Tenant's right to use,the Leased Premises and the Access Easement as provided in this Lease is expressly made contingent upon (i) Tenant's maintaining at Tenant's sole cost and:expense all the certificates; permits, zoning and other approvals that may required by any federal, state, or local authority for Tenant's use of the Leased Premises (individually, a "Governmental Approval" and collectively,.the "Governmental Approvals "); and (ii) Tenant complying with the terms and conditions of this Lease. Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in its efforts to obtain and/or retain all such Governmental Approvals and shall take. no action which. would adversely affect the status of the Leased Premises with respect to the Tenant's proposed use thereof. b. Interference Study. If in the future Landlord experiences interference with the_ Landlord's Police, Fire, Emergency Medical; Public Works (SCADA System) and Park's . Communications Systems ( "Landlord's Communication Systems ") and believes the interference to be from Tenant's Communication. Facility, Tenant' shall take immediate steps to correct the interference problem, afits cost and expense as provided in Paragraph 6(a) hereof. C. Non - approval. In the event that any Governmental Approval, necessary under 'Subparagraph 4a above is rejected or if any permit, license or Governmental Approval currently issued to Tenant is cancelled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by the applicable governmental authority so that Tenant, in its sole discretion, is unable to use the 1766670 5 Leased Premises for its •intended purposes, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease as provided in Paragraph 11 hereof and be reimbursed for the Rent paid if made pursuant to Subparagraph 3a above. Notice of Tenant's exercise .of its right to terminate this Lease shall be given to Landlord pursuant to Section 19 hereof. Except as required under Subparagraph 11(d) below, upon'such termination, this Lease shall become null and void and the parties shall have no further obligations to each other. 5. PERMITTED USES. a. Subject to the terms of this Lease, the Leased Premises and the Access Easement may be used by Tenant solely for the following uses: (i) any lawful activity in connection with the provisions of wireless communication services including WiMAX/WiFi, the transmission and reception of radio communication signals; and (ii) for the purpose. of constructing, installing, repairing, maintaining, removing; improving and operating the Tenant's Communication Facility, in accordance with this Lease and in accordance with the transmission and reception of microwave spectrum communication signals authorized for use of the Tenant by the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC "). "This use is non - exclusive, and Landlord reserves the right to allow the Property to be used by others, provided they do not interfere with Tenant's use of the Tenant's Communication Facility. Tenant agrees to and shall comply with all ordinances, statutes and regulations of the Landlord and all other county, state and /or federal agencies. b. The placement and/or location of the equipment of any Colocator, as hereinafter defined, on the Monopole or in the Leased Premises and the manner in which the applicable Colocators' equipment is constructed and installed, shall be subject to prior review and approval of Landlord and by a registered professional structural engineer ( "Engineer") submitted to Landlord and its agents, which have approved the same. Landlord shall, at all times, use reasonable efforts to provide Tenant 24 hours a day, 7 days a week ingress, egress, and access to 1766610 the Tenant's Communication Facility over the Access Easement,, subject to the terms of this Lease. Tenant will not allow any mechanics' or materialmen's liens to be placed against the Property "as a result of Tenant's work on the Property. Tenant-shall have the right during the term of this Lease to access.the Lease Premises, over the Access Easement, including vehicular access, for the repair, maintenance,. improvement. and operation of the Tenant's Communication Facility. If the Tenant; or any of Tenant's agents, contractors or other, designees, damages the Property at any time during the term of this Lease, it shall immediately(within thirty (30)- days), repair the Property to the conditions it was in prior to the Tenant, or any of Tenant's agents, contractors or other designees, damaging the same, including but not limited to the filling of all ruts in the grass or damage to asphalt caused by Tenant's, or any of Tenant's agents, contractors or other designees, equipment driving on the Property and shall re -seed or re -sod all grass areas and replace all other vegetation including trees and shrubs damaged by Tenant; such that the Property is in the same or substantially the same condition it-was before said damage. d. Tenant agrees that if Tenant's Communication Facility produces noise levels that cause a disturbance to the. surrounding neighbors of the Property in excess of applicable law, Tenant will at its own expense install noise mitigating equipment or a buffer to meet State noise standards. C. Tenant shall telephonically notify the Landlord of scheduled work on Tenant's CommunicationTacility that is to be done after 5:00 o'clock p.m. on business days, and any time on weekends and holidays. The notice shall be given to Landlord so that it is received at least forty -eight (48) hours in advance of the start of the scheduled work. In the case of Tenant's emergency work on Tenant's Communication Facility, Tenant_ shall telephonically notify the Landlord as soon as reasonably practicable. 176667A. 7 f. EXCEPT AS TO EMERGENCY WORK ON TENANT'S COMMUNICATION FACILITYWHERE COORDINATION IS NOT.REASONABLY PRACTICAL, TENANT SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK TO BE DONE ON TENANT'S COMMUNICATION FACILITY WITH THE LANDLORD'S "PARK DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE THAT IT IS SCHEDULED AROUND ALL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES, MAINTENANCE OF THE PARK AND/OR . IMPROVEMENT TROJECTS OF THE LANDLORD IN THE PARK, SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE FOREGOING. 6. TENANT'S COMMUNICATION FACILITY. a. Any facility, antenna, structure, equipment or other type of future improvement of Tenant's.- 'Communication Facility made by Tenant during this Lease installed by the Tenant on the Leased Premises, must be of a type and installed in such a manner as not to cause any diminution in the quality of the communication signal, transmission or reception (hereinafter "interference ") of any governmental communication equipment installed by the Landlord or other. . public agency now or in the future on the Property or the property adjacent thereto ( "Creek Valley School ") If any such interference is alleged by the Landlord and Landlord provides reasonable evidence that such interference is likely caused by Tenant's use or operation of the Leased Premises or anyfacilities, structures, equipment or other types of improvements installed thereon by Tenant, it shall be the immediate and affirmative duty of Tenant to diligently pursue a cure -to eliminate all of the interference. If any such interference is alleged by Landlord and . Landlord provides reasonable evidence that such interference is likely caused by Tenant's use or operation of the Leased Premises or Tenant's Communication Facility or any facilities, structures, equipment or other types of improvements installed thereon by Tenant, Tenant shall. reimburse Landlord for its reasonable costs associated with conducting such interference studies. 1766670 8 Such reimbursement shall be made within thirty (30) days of Tenant's receipt of Landlord's invoice and documentation reasonably supporting such costs, in an amount not to exceed Five Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($5,000.00). The parties agree that if the interference, that is likely caused by Tenant's use or operation of the Leased Premises, warrants an emergency response, the Notice provision in Paragraph 19 shall not apply. Rather, Landlord shall provide notice of reasonable evidence that the interference is likely caused by the Tenant's use or operation of the Leased Premises verbally by telephone, facsimile or e-mail, whichever is determined by the Landlord to be the most immediate method of conveying such notice of reasonable evidence to Tenant, provided such notice by Landlord is in a form that is reasonably practical for Tenant to assess such alleged interference. Notice of reasonable evidence of Tenant's interference shall be phone, faxed, or e- mailed to the following: Tenant's Emergency Responder Telephone Number Email National Operations Center (NOC) 800 -788 -7011 noc.noc@crowneastle.com Upon providing notice of reasonable evidence that any interference is likely caused by Tenant's use or operation of the Tenant's Communication Facility, Tenant shall send a qualified technician or representative to the Leased Premises within eight (8) hours from the time that the notice of reasonable evidence is provided by Landlord. The required eight (8) hour emergency response time under these circumstances is applicable 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The qualified technician or representative shall be capable of assessing the situation and eliciting the necessary response, including any repairs, alterations or modifications to Tenant's Communication Facility. 1766670 9 If such'interference cannot be cured within twenty -four (24) hours after the notice provided for in this Paragraph 6a, the Tenant shall immediately cease using or operating the Tenant's Communication Facility or any of its facilities, structures, equipment or.other types of improvements installed thereon, until such interference is cured to the reasonable satisfaction. of Landlord. b. Tenant shall be solely responsible for any taxes on its personal property. C. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense; maintain Tenant's Communication Facility and the Leased Premises in as close as reasonably possible to the condition they are in as of the Commencement Date, reasonable wear and tear accepted and shall further maintain during the term of this Lease, any fencing surrounding the Leased Premises and all landscaped areas in and around the fencing and the Leased Premises (e.g. weeding, adding mulch as needed and repairing the fence). 7. UTILITY SERVICE AND ACCESS EQUIPMENT. All of Tenant's electrical wires, telephone wires and related cables (coaxial cables) and related equipment installed on the Property and/or the Leased Premises shall be installed underground in the future except as permitted by the Landlord in writing and shall be installed on the Property and the Leased Premises, or within the Monopole according to the Landlord's applicable code; rules and regulations and all state codes, rules and regulations. Any future utilities_ shall be directionally bored and adjusted in the field to avoid potential impact to any existing trees and "hand dug" in any area or location where there are numerous existing utilities. Tenant shall provide Landlord with an as -built plan showing the exact location of all Utilities, installed by Tenant on the Leased Premises and/or the Property. Tenant shall furnish Landlord with pertinent information as to the exact type of AC power used by the Tenant. The Tenant agrees that upon the request of the Landlord, it will field locate all existing Utilities at Tenant's expense. 1766670 10 As partial consideration for Rent paid under this Lease,_Landlord hereby grants to the Tenant anrappurtenant non - exclusive easement for the Utilities where they are currently located and an appurtenant non = exclusive easement for ingress,, egress, and, access to the Leased Premises over the. Access Easement. Upon notice, Landlord shall have the right, at Landlord's sole expense, to relocate the Access Easement, provided such new location shall not materially interfere with-the operations:of Tenant's Communication Facility. The new Access Easement, provided hereunder, shall have the same term.as this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that part of the Tenant's current access is through the Creek Valley School parking lot and that if it is limited or prohibited in the future, the Landlord will . provide an alternate easement for access, to the Leased Premises across the Landlord's property ( "Alternate Access Easement'). The Alternate Access Easement shall be one of the Alternate Access Easements shown on the Plot Plan. Tenant shall be responsible for all construction cost. related to the construction of this Alternate Access Easement and Landlord and Tenant agree to amend this Lease to reflect the Alternate Access Easement and shall legally describe the same in the amendment of the Lease. .8. ADDITIONAL LESSEE'S. Tenant acknowledges that Landlord may in the future lease a portion of the Property to other parties, so long as Landlord shall not itself, nor permit any new tenants or licensees to install equipment on the Property, if such equipment would cause i interference with Tenant's operations of Tenant's Communication Facility. 9. ADDITIONAL TENANT FACILITIES AND /OR COLOCATORS. Tenant may not add additional facilities, structures, equipment or other types of improvements, including equipment cabinets and/or antennas beyond those currently existing as part of the Tenant's Communication Facility without the prior written approval of the Landlord which approval. shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. If Landlord fails to 176667v3 11 provide its written approval or disapproval of Tenant's request within thirty (30) days after Tenant submits plans and specifications setting forth the additional facilities, structures and equipment including, but not limited to, equipment cabinets, coaxial cables and/or antennas that Tenant intends to add, which plans and specifications, shall be in ;a form and substance acceptable to Landlord, Landlord's approval shall be deemed to have been provided to Tenant. If Landlord approves additional facilities; equipment or antennas on the Monopole or in the Leased Premises or on the Property, for other users or carriers ("Colocators "), Landlord and Tenant acknowledge and agree that Landlord shall have the exclusive right to lease space on the Property to the Colocators for the applicable Colocators' equipment including equipment cabinets and/or shelters, to the Colocators ("Colocators', Space") and Landlord may charge additional rent for any of said Colocators' equipment including equipment cabinets and/or shelters or other types of improvements of the applicable Colocator in the Colocators' Space. Tenant may lease antenna space on the Monopole to Colocators and also provide for the installation of related equipment, i.e. ice bridges, coaxial cable and utilities, etc. in the Leased Premises, but not lease space in the Leased Premises for an y Colocators' equipment cabinets or shelters, subject to Landlord's approval as provided in this Lease and the Tenant shall be entitled to receive all of the rent from the Colocators for the Colocators antennas on the Monopole and related equipment. All Colocators leasing space from the Tenant on the Monopole must comply with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures of the Landlord; including executing an application for the use of the Monopole and the Colocators' equipment and enter into (i) a separate lease for the Colocators' Space and the Colocators' equipment cabinets and /or shelters and related equipment and utilities and access easements, with Landlord; and (ii) a separate Monopole lease and/or equipment lease for the Colocators' use of the Monopole and 176667A 12 '4. related equipment located within the Leased Premises with Tenant. Tenant will be-entitled to retain all Monopole rents or other rents from the Colocators for use of the Leased Premises. Tenant agrees to enter into. an "Escrow Agreement" .in a form and: substance acceptable to Landlord wherein Tenant shall deposit with Landlord the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), at the time, that Tenant proposes to make any.alteration or modification.of, or addition to, the Tenant's Communication Facilityy whether by Tenant or any Colocator pursuant to this Lease, to be used by Landlord to reimburse Landlord for all costs incurred by the Landlord in connection with any such alteration, modification of, or addition to, the Tenant's Communication Facility or a Colocator pursuant to this Lease including, but not limited to, plan review, structural review, site meetings, inspection time, and as -built updating because of Tenant's changes, including attorney's fees for drafting and/or reviewing documents. 10. DEFAULT. Any of the following occurrences, conditions; or acts shall be deemed a "Default" under this lease: a. If Tenant fails to pay amounts due under this Lease within thirty (30) days of its receipt of written.notice that such payments are overdue; b. If either party fails to observe or performs its obligations under this. Lease and does not cure such failure within sixty (60) days from its receipt of written notice of breach without, however, limiting any other rights available to the parties pursuant to any other provision of this Lease.. If the default may not be reasonably cured within such sixty (60) day period; either party may request, the other party to grant an extension of the time to cure. C. Except as expressly limited hereby, Landlord and Tenant shall have such remedies for the default of the other party hereto as may be provided at law or equity following written notice of such default and failure to cure the same within the applicable`time allowed to cure under the terms of this Lease. 1766670 13 11. TERMINATION. a. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without penalty or further liability, as follows: i. by either party upon sixty (60) days written notice of a Default as defined herein (without, however, limiting any other rights available to the parties pursuant to any other provisions hereof); ii. by Tenant upon ninety (90) days written notice by Tenant if Tenant is unable after filing all necessary applications for obtaining or maintaining of any license, permit or other Governmental Approval and maldng all reasonable efforts and using due diligence to comply with all requirements necessary to obtain or maintain any license, permit or other Governmental Approval necessary for the installation and/or operation of the Tenant's Communication Facility or Tenant's business; iii. by Tenant upon one hundred eighty (180) days' notice if the Tenant's Communication Facility becomes unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering standards for Tenant's. Communication Facility or the communications system to which Tenant's Communication Facility belongs; iv. by Landlord upon ninety (90) days written notice if Landlord reasonably determines that Tenant has failed to comply with applicable ordinances, or state or federal law, or any conditions attached to Government Approvals granted thereunder, after a public hearing before the Landlord's Council; V. by Landlord and/or Tenant if there is an interference problem with the Landlord's Communication Systems that cannot be corrected; or 1766670 14 vi. Upon eighteen (18) months written notice after the Initial Term by Landlord if its Council decides to sell or redevelop the Property and/or discontinue use of the Property for public or governmental purposes in a manner that is inconsistent, in Landlord's. sole opinion, with Tenant's continued use of Tenant's Communication Facility. b. Notice of Termination. The parties shall give notice of termination of this Lease in accordance with Section 19 of this Lease. All rentals paid for by Tenant prior to said termination date shall be retained by Landlord. c: Tenant's Liability for Early Termination. If Tenant terminates this Lease pursuant to subsection l Ladii, above, Tenant.shall pay to Landlord as liquidated damages for early termination,, 150% of the annual Rent for the year in which Tenant terminates; provided, however, that Tenant shall not be required to pay an liquidated damages or termination fee if Tenant elects not to renew the term of this Lease pursuant to Section 2, above. d. Removal of Communication Facility. Upon termination of this Lease for any. reason, Tenant shall, within ninety (90) days of "Landlord's Notice" as hereinafter provided, remove the Tenant's Communication Facility including, but not limited to, the Monopole and the base for the Monopole (except that Tenant shall not be required to remove more than'the top five (5) feet of the base) and any fencing from the Leased Premises, and all Coaxial Cable, and Utilities and restore the Property to a condition as close as possible to its original condition. The Monopole and/or any other part of Tenant's Communication Facility or any other improvement made by Tenant or any Colocator on the Property, remaining on the Property ninety (90) days after Landlord's Notice may be removed by Landlord at Tenant's sole cost and expense, or at Landlord's sole discretion, become the property of the Landlord free of any claim by Tenant or any person claiming through Tenant. I£ Tenant fails to remove the Monopole and the base 1766670 15 f thereof or Tenant's Communication Facility or any other improvements within said 'ninety (90) day period, the Tenant shall pay to Landlord, notwithstanding the termination of this Lease, Rent in an amount equal to 150% of the amount of Rent that would have been due,.for the period of.,. time that the Monopole and equipment and/or Tenant's Communication Facility remains on the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraphs of this Section, upon termination of this:Lease for any reason except for as provided in section l La.vi, Landlord.and Tenant may mutually . agree to have the Tenant leave the Monopole on the Leased Premises. In the event that Landlord and Tenant mutually agree that Tenant shall.leave the Monopole on the Leased Premises, the Tenant shall remove all of the rest of Tenant's Communication Facility from the,Monopole including the Antenna, all Coaxial Cables and - Utilities on the Leased Premises and/or the j Property, including any of the forgoing that belongs to any Colocator. If Landlord and Tenant mutually agree to have the Monopole remain on the Leased Premises, the Tenant shall not remove the chain link fencing surrounding the Leased Premises. If Landlor&and Tenant cannot mutually agree within forty-five (45) days of the termination of the Lease as to whether the Tenant shall leave the Monopole on the Existing , . Leased Premises, the Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, remove the Monopole, and that J portion of the base as required by Section 11 d, and the rest of Tenant's Communication Facility, including all Utilities and the fencing and all Colocator's (if any) equipment, antennas and cables. 12: INSURANCE. Tenant agrees to obtain and maintain during the term of this Lease the insurance coverage's set forth in Exhibit "C ". 176667v3 16 13. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION. a. General.. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials;_ officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by Landlord or for which the-Landlord may be liable in the performance of this Lease, except those which arise solely from the gross negligence, or willful misconduct of Landlord, or, its iespective.employees; agents or contractors. Tenant shall further defend and indemnify all .claims arising out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or presence of the Tenant's Communication Facility on the Property. b. Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents and warrants that its use of the Leased Premises will not generate and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Leased Premises, nor transport to the Leased Premises or over the Property, any Hazardous Materials, unless Tenant specifically informs Landlord thereof in writing twenty -four hours prior to such storage, disposal or transport, or otherwise as soon as Tenant becomes aware of the existence of Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises. The obligations of the Tenant under this Paragraph 13 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. C. Hazardous. Materials. Without limiting the scope of Subparagraph 13a and 13b above, Tenant will be solely responsible for and will defend, indemnify, and hold Landlord, its agents, and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, and liabilities, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, arising out of or in connection with the cleanup or restoration of the Leased Premises, associated with the Tenant's use of Hazardous Materials. For the purposes of this Lease; "Hazardous Materials" shall be interpreted broadly and specifically includes, without limitation, asbestos, fuel, batteries or any hazardous substance, waste, or 1766670 17 materials as defined in any federal, state, or local environmental or safety law or regulations including, but not limited to; CERCLA. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Tenant shall have the right to store and use standard quantities of batteries within the Leased Premises so long as it does so in full compliance with all: applicable laws. 14. LIMITATION OYLIABILITY. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary jn this Lease, in no event will either party be liable to the other party for, or indemnify the other party . against, punitive; indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profits, income or business opportunities; provided, however, that this provision shall not release or reduce Tenant's obligation -to pay Rent to the Landlord in accordance with the terms of this Lease. Landlord's liability under this Lease for any claim of any nature, or reason, by any person or party, is limited to the liability limits of Minnesota Statutes; Chapter 466, 15. ASSIGNMENT. This Lease, or rights thereunder, may not!be sold; assigned, or - transferred,at any time by Tenant except to Tenant's affiliates or subsidiaries; or any party that merges or consolidates with Tenant or Tenant's parent, or any party that purchases or otherwise acquires all or substantially all of Tenant's stock or assets. without the written consent of the Landlord, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. For purposes of this paragraph, an "affiliate" or "subsidiary" means an entity in which Tenant owns greater than a 50% interest. Landlord hereby consents to the assignment by Tenant of its rights under this Lease as collateral to any entity which provides financing for the Tenant's Communication Facility subject to Landlord's rights to retain the same and/or other improvements if Tenant fails to remove them as required by this Lease. 16. QUIET ENJOYMENT. Tenant, upon paying Rent, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Leased Premises and the Access Easement, provided Tenant is not in default 1166670 18 under any other covenant or agreement contained in this Lease. Landlord hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have statutory or otherwise concerning Tenant's Communication Facility or any portion thereof which shall.be deemed personal property for the,purposes of this Lease, whether or not the same is deemed real or personal property. under the;applicable laws, and Landlord gives Tenant and Tenant's mortgagees ( "Mortgagees "), the .right to remove all or any portion of Tenant's Communication,Facility from time to time, whether'before or after default under the Lease, in Tenant's and/or mortgagee's sole discretion and without Landlord's consent, subject to the obligations of the Tenant,to remove Tenant's Communication Facility as set forth in Section I I(d). If.a Mortgagee desires to remove Tenant's Communication Facility, the Mortgagee shall sign an agreement with the Landlord stating that they will be responsible for restoring the Property to a condition as close as possible to its original condition, and that they will be liable to the Landlord for any cost and expenses incurred by Landlord in restoring the Property to 'a condition as close as possible to its original condition in the event that the Mortgagee fails to do so, 17. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION. If the Tenant's Communication Facility or any portion thereof is destroyed or damaged so as to materially hinder the effective use of the Tenant's Communication Facility by Tenant through no fault or negligence of Tenant, Tenant may elect,to terminate this Lease upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Landlord. In such, - event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease (except as to the Tenant's obligations under this Lease to remove the Tenant's Communication Facility under Paragraph. 1 Ld.) as of ,the date of the notice to Landlord,and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant. If Tenant elects to continue this Lease, then the Rent shall abate for a period of ninety (90) days or until the Tenant's Communication Facility is restored to the condition existing prior to the damage or destruction, whichever is earlier.. 1766670 19 18. CONDEMNATION. In the event the whole of the Leased Premises and/or Property is taken by eminent domain, this Lease shall terminate as. of the date title to the Leased Premises or the Property vests in the condemning authority. In event a portion of the Leased'Premises is taken by eminent domain, either party shall have the right to terminate this Lease as of the date of title transfer, by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party.. In the event of any taking under the power of eminent domain, Tenant shall not be entitled to any portion of the reward paid for the taking and the Landlord shall receive full amount of such award. Tenant. hereby expressly waives anyright or claim to any portion thereof. Although all damages, whether awarded as `compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the Leased Premises or the Property shall belong to Landlord, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover from the condemning authority, but not from Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Tenant on account or any and all damage to Tenant's business and any costs or expenses incurred by Tenant in movingtremoving all or a portion of the Tenant's Communication Facility. 19. NOTICES. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally delivered or mailed, certified mail, return receipt requested, or delivered by a nationally recognized overnight courier service, to the following addresses or to any other 'address of Tenant or Landlord that is given from time to time to the other party pursuant to this provision, regarding written notice: If to Landlord: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: City Manager 1766670 20 e. Enforcement and Attorneys' Fees. The prevailing party in any action or proceeding in court to enforce the terms of this Lease including any appeals shall-be entitled.to receive:its reasonable attorney's:fees and other reasonable:costs and expenses from the non prevailing'party. I f. Governiniz Law. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota; g. Severability. If any term of this Lease ig found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. h. Memorandum of Lease. Landlord and Tenant agree that upon the request of the Landlord or Tenant to sign a Memorandum of Lease in-the form acceptable to both parties which may be recorded in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder by either party. i. Estoppel Information.- Each party agrees to furnish to the other, within ten (10) days after request, such truthful estoppel information as the other may reasonably request relating to this Lease. j. Brokers. If either party is represented by a real estate broker in this transaction, . that -party shall be fully responsible for any fee due such.broker in thisAransaction, that party shall be fully responsible for any fee due such broker, and shall hold the other party harmless from any claims for commission by such broker. k. No Waiver. No provision of this Lease will be deemed waived by either party unless expressly waived in writing by the waiving party. No waiver shall be implied by delay or any other act or omission of either party. No waiver by either party of any provisions of this Lease shall be deemed a waiver of such'provision.with respect to any subsequent matter relating to such provision. 176667A 22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: CITY OF EDINA Dated: 120 BY: Name: James Hovland Title: Mayor Dated: , 20 BY: Name: Scott Neal Title: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The.foregoing instrument was acknoviwledged before me this day of 20__, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the. authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. [JFKI 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317 Eagan, MN. 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 1766670 24 J TENANT: T- MOBILE USA TOWER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. By: CCTMO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Its: Attorney -in -Fact By: Print Name: Smith Title: Real Est• to Transaction Manager Dated: ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF �Ex ►�s } COUNTY OF i-1r,9*15 } 1 Onthis to dayof —D¢ceym�gr , -20 1 before me (far -en (notary public), personally appeared Nt I -ey ! w, ;44, (print name), who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence•to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of 'I eX&;c that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature G%Cy� (notary public) Car`n �n Shaughnessy Min„ (NOTARY SEAL) GExplrei:03-19-2018 ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to another'document. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. Title of Document Type: Lease for Communication Facility Agreement Number of Pages Date of Document 1766670 2$ THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. [JFK] 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 3,17 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 1766670 26 Exhibit "A ": Exhibit `B ": Exhibit "C ": 176667v3 FIST OF >EXI3IBITS Legal Descriptions (1) . Property (2) Leased Premises (3) Access Easement Plot Plan Tenant's Required Insurance 27 Tenant Site I.D. #: AIP009 Site Name: Edina — Creek Valley EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA. ALL THE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO -WIT: THAT PART OF LOT 24, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 196,.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, WHICH LIES WITHIN THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST .QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 21, LYING EAST OF GLEESON ROAD AND LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE KNOWN AS LINE A: LINE A BEGINNING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 21; THENCE NORTH.00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 1960.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST A,DISTANCE OF 661.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 11,MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 48 MINUTES33 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 330.0,FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 48 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 168.18 FEET,TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF LINE A;. THENCE NORTH 76 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 12- SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 879.93 FEET (DELTA ANGLE 21 DEGREES, TANGENT DISTANCE 163.09 FEET) A DISTANCE OF 322.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST ALONG TANGENT TO'LAST DESCRIBED CURVE A DISTANCE OF 290.10 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 647.96 FEET (DELTA ANGLE 21 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 58 SECONDS, TANGENT DISTANCE 123.50 FEET) A DISTANCE OF 244.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG TANGENT TO LAST DESCRIBED CURVE A DISTANCE OF 81.42 FEET AND THERE TERMINATING.' TAX ID NO: 06- 11621120002 ADDRESS: 6303 Gleason Road, Edina, MN 55424 1766670 (2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES: That part of Lot 24, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 196, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County. Minnesota, described as (ollows. Commencing at the most easterly corner of Lot 1. Block 1, CIIEROKEE HILLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County. thence North 54 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northerly extension of the northeasterly line of said fat 1 a distance of 228.82 feet; thence North 41 degrees 21 minutes 2t seconds Best 134.74 feet; thence easterly a distance of 56.138 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 72.38 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 01 minutes 25 seconds; thence North 66 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 336.83 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 78.13 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 148.07 feet and a central angle of 30 degrees 14 minutes 07 seconds; thence S.)uth 63 degrees 23 minutes 07 seconds East, tangent to last described curve a distance of 49.81 feet; thence easterly a distance of 46.93 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 55.01 feet and .a central angle of 48 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds; thence North 67 degrees 43 minutes 52 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 101.35 feet; thence easterly a distance of 28.50 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 37.01 feet and a central angle of 44 degrees 07 minutes 2O seconds; thence South 68 degrees 08 minutes 48 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 23 98 feet: thence easterly a distance of 25.59 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 19.55 feet and a central angle of 74 degrees 59 minutes 59 seconds; thence North 36 degrees 51 minutes 13 seconds East. tangent to last described curve, a distance of 168.60 feet: thence northerly a distance of 27.20 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 25.94 feet and a central angle of 60 degrees 05 minutes 02 seconds: thence North 23 degrees 06 minutes 10 seconds East, tangent to lost described curve, a distance of 135.64 feet; thence westerly a distance of 43.95 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 36.92 feet and a central angle of 88 degrees 12 minutes 29 seconds; thence South 68 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 51.50 feet; thence northerly a distance of 39.27 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; thence North 01 degrees 18 minutes 39 seconds West, tangent to last described curve a distance of 39.92 feet; thence South 88 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West 11.00 feel to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 01 degrees 18 minutes 39 seconds West 30.00 feet; thence North 68 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds East 30.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 18 minutes 39 seconds East 30.00 feel: thence South 88 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. 1766670 (3) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ACCESS EASEMENT: A 20.00 loot wide permanent easement for access purposes over and across part of tut 24, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 196, according to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota, the center line of said easement Is described as follows; Commencing at the most easterly corner of Lot 1. Block 1. CHEROKEE HILLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County; thence North 54 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds West, assumed bearing alongg the northerly extension of the northeasterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 228.82 feet to the point of beginning of said center line to be; described; thence North 41 degrees 21 minutes 21 seconds East.134.74 feel; thence'easterly.a distance of 56.68 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the South,'hoving a radius of 72.36 feel and a central angle of 45 degrees 01 minutes 25 seconds; thence North 86 degrees 22- minutes 46 seconds Enst, tangent to last described curve, a distance, of 336.83 feet; thence southeasterly a distance. of 78.13 feet along a tangential curve. concave to the south, having a radius of 148.07 feet and a centhki angle of 30 degrees 14 minutes 07 seconds; thence South 63 degrees 23 minutes 07 seconds .Eest, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 4,9.81 feet; thence easterly a distance of 46.93 feet,along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 55.01 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds; thence North 67 degrees 43 minutes 52 seconds East, tangent.to last described curve. a distance of 101.35 feet; thence easterly a distance of 28.50 feet .along b tangential curve. concave to the south, having •n radius of 37.01 feet and s central angle of 44 degrees 07 minutes 20 seconds; thence South 68 degrees 09 minutes 48 seconds East, tangent to last described curve a distance of 23.98 feet; thence easterly a distance of 25.59 feet along a tangential curve; concave to the north, having a radius 'of 19.55 feel and a central angle of 74 degrees 59 minutes 59 seconds: thence North 36 degrees 51 minutes e distance f seconds ,East. to aeon to last .described curve, a distance of 188.60 feet; thence northerly g tongential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 25.94 feel and a central angle of 60 degrees 05 minutes 02 seconds: thence North 23. degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 135.64 feet; thence westerly a distance of 43.95 feet along a tangentiel curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 38:92 feet and a central angle iof 68 degrees'12 minutes 29 seconds: thence South 88 'degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West. tangent to last described curve a distance of 51.50 feet; thence northerly a distance of 39:27 feet olong a. tangential curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 25.00 feel and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds: thence North 01 degrees t8 minutes 39 seconds West, tangent to last described curve a distance of 38.92 feet and said center line there terminating. the side lines of said easement shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate on the northerly extension of the.. northeasterly •line of said Lot I and on a northerly and southerly extension of a line bearing South 88 degrees 41 minutes 21 seconds West from sold, point of termination. 176667v3 EXHIBIT 66B'9 PLOT PLAN sign "It . Jig "T Im I tit. 'Sir. 93 . -4k EO SIR A" i OPI yr 1766670 Pr n qt 1. I EDIT "C" TENANT'S REQUIRED INSURANCE a. Worker's Compensation. The Tenant must maintain Workers' Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes, rules and regulations. The policy shall also provide Employer's Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 Bodily Injury each accident, $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, policy limit, and $500,000 Bodily Injury by 1. disease, each employee. b. General Liabili ty. The Tenant must maintain an occurrence form comprehensive general liability coverage. Such coverage shall include, but not be limited to, bodily injury, property damage -- broad form, and personal injury, for the hazards of Premises /Operation, broad form contractual liability, independent contractors, and products /completed operations. The Tenant must maintain aforementioned comprehensive general liability coverage with limits of liability not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence; $1,000,000 personal and advertising injury; $2,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate. These limits may be satisfied by the comprehensive general liability coverage or in combination with an umbrella or excess liability policy, provided coverage afforded by the umbrella or excess policy are no less than the underlying comprehensive general liability coverages. Tenant will maintain Completed Operations coverage for a minimum of two years after the construction of Tenant's Communication Facility is completed. C. Automobile Liability. The Tenant must carry Automobile Liability coverage. Coverage shall afford total liability, limits for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident. The liability limits may be afforded under the Commercial Policy, or in combination with an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy provided coverage of rides afforded by the - Umbrella Excess Policy are no less than the underlying Commercial Auto Liability coverage. Coverage shall be provided by Bodily Injury and Property Damage for the ownership, use, maintenance or operation of all owned, non -owned and hired automobiles. The Commercial Automobile Policy shall include at least statutory personal injury protection, uninsured motorists and underinsured motorists coverages. d. Tenant Property Insurance. The Tenant must keep.in force for the duration of the Lease a policy covering damages to its property at the Leased Premises. The amount of coverage shall be for the full insurable value and be sufficient to replace the damaged property, loss of use and comply with any ordinance or law requirements. e. Hazardous Materials Coverage. Tenant must carry sufficient coverage, to the reasonable satisfaction of Landlord, for damage caused by Hazardous Materials. 1766670 F L Excess Liability. Tenant shall also maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with a combined sirigle limit. of $5,000,000.00 which provides coverage in excess of all other coverages (except .Workers' Compensation) required to be maintained by Tenant under this Lease. g.. Additional Insured - 'Certificate of Insurance. The Tenant shall provide, prior to the start of construction of the Communication Facility;, evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance, issued by a company. (rated, A or better), licensed to do business in the. State of Minnesota; which includes all coverages required in this Paragraph. Tenant will name the Landlord as an Additional Insured on the General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Policies. The Certificates) shall also provide the coverage may not be cancelled, non - renewed, or reduced without ihity (30). days prior written notice to the Landlord, except.for cancellation for non - payment of premium, in which case Tenant shall provide such notice. 1766670 ti To: Mayor and City Council /ANA, ►VJ 1 MY 1898 Agenda Item:#:' IV.I. The Recommended Bid is From: Ann Kattreh ® Within Budget Parks & Recreation Director ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: December 16, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — Construction Manager Contract Braemar Clubhouse Renovation Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: December 10, 2014 N/A Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Zeman Construction 3% of total construction costs plus general conditions not to exceed $10,540 /month. Recommended Quote or Bid: Zeman Construction General Information: On March 18, 2014 the City Council directed staff to proceed with the outsourcing of the grill operations at the Braemar Clubhouse. At the November 18, 2014 City Council meeting Council approved the lease agreement with the Tin Fish to bring the popular and high quality food establishment to the Braemar Clubhouse. On November 18, 2014 the City Council approved a contract with Sperides Reiners Architects (SRA), Inc. to provide architectural services to update sections of the clubhouse including kitchen renovations. As part of the lease agreement with the Tin Fish, the city agreed to provide the shell of the kitchen, flooring and utility stubs. $415,000 is budgeted for clubhouse updates and kitchen renovations and is included in the 2015 CIP. Improvements will .include the clubroom (dining area), banquet room, banquet hallway, building entrances, and upper level restrooms. Anticipated updates include new lighting, carpet and ceiling, wall & soffit treatments. Restroom updates including tile, paint, counter tops, plumbing fixtures and stalls. New doors to replace the folding divider between the banquet room and clubroom will be explored to update the space, bring in more light and improve function. An open house is being held at the clubhouse on Dec. 18 at 5 p.m. to review preliminary designs. Staff is recommending Zeman Construction to perform construction management services. Zeman Construction will provide construction management services for all of the improvements listed above. City of Edina 4801 W. 506 St. Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 'IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Construction management costs include a 3% service fee and project staffing which will be completed on an as needed basis and not to exceed four months. Total construction management project costs are not to exceed $54,610. We anticipate the cost to fall in the range-of $33,000 - $40,000. Staff will provide on -site supervision to keep costs down. Roger Knutson has reviewed and approved an AIA C 132 -2009 contract. Attachments: Fee Proposal Zeman Construction City of Edina - 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina,. MN 55424 Exhibit A - Fee Proposal City of Edina Braemar Clubhouse December 10, 2014 m U) Al r-r Fee Proposal Zeman Construction Company General Superintendent $285 Superintendent (TBD if required) $5,980 Project Manager $2,990 Safety Director $285 General Clean -up $500 Trucking /Mobilization $100 Telephones $100 Printing /Postage $100 Internal Equipment Charges $200 Total Monthly General Conditions $10,540 Project Management Personnel Zeman proposes the following rates for project management personnel, reimbursed as a cost of the work. , Project Executive $110 /hr Project Manager $95 /hr General Superintendent $95 /hr Superintendent $85 /hr Safety Director $95 /hr Fee: Our proposal is predicated on the terms of AIA Document C132 -2009, providing that the basis for payment is the "Cost of the Work Plus a Fee" with a negotiated maximum price. Our proposed fee is 3% of total construction cost, plus the reimburs- able general conditions stated below. This project will be divided into two phases. The first phase will begin immediately and will include interior renovations to the clubhouse and the expansion of a small outdoor patio on the north side of the clubhouse. Phase One must be completed by April 15, 2014. Phase Two involves potential exterior renovations to include roofing and siding on the clubhouse and executive course building. Phase Two feasibility is currently being explored and will possibly be completed later in 2014. Upon determination of project scope, this percentage amount will be fixed as a lump sum amount. This fixed fee will increase only if the scope of the work is substantially and materi- ally altered at the Owner's request. Reimbursable General Conditions Once we are able to meet with the team and confirm project scope and anticipated design time, an overall project sched- ule can be established. The following reimbursement costs are shown as a per month basis. These costs represent a not- to -ex- ceed amount per month. Should any savings be realized, they will be returned to the City of Edina 100 %. Insurance Rates: Excess liability /Umbrella - $5.50 per $1,000.00. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #:, IV. J. From: Brian E. Olson, PE, Director of Public Works 960 Action M Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Easement Agreement, 4420 Grimes Avenue Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign attached Temporary Construction Easement Agreement at 4420 Grimes Avenue Information / Background: During this past summer a retaining wall at 4420 Grimes Avenue began to fail. Since the construction of the original retaining wall was needed because of the installation of a sidewalk, the responsibility of the reconstruction is with the City. Since the wall is very close to the property line, the City and the property owner negotiated the attached no cost easement that identifies the roles and responsibilities of both parties. Staff recommends City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to, sign attached- easement agreement which will allow us onto private property to reconstruct the retaining wall in question. Attachment: • Construction Easement agreement with the property owner of 4420 Grimes Avenue. GA MINFRASIStreetMetalning- 11sM420 Grimes.dooc .City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 AGREEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR RETAINING WALL THIS jAGREEMENT dated 20/4- by and between lkF�md� iZ&A, husband and wife ( "Owners') and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal ocorrporation ( "City"). Recitals A. Owners hold fee title to the property legally described in Exhibit A ( "Property "). B. A retaining wall located both on the Property and on and along City's right -of -way needs to be reconstructed. C. The City has agreed to reconstruct the retaining wall on the Property and Owners have agreed to provide a temporary construction easement for the work. NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. City Responsibilities. A. Retaining Wall Construction. City will construct and pay all costs associated. with the retaining wall consistent with the City approved plans and specification ('Plans'). B. Landscaping. After completing construction, City will regrade Property after backfilling behind the new wall, ensuring a consistent slope from the existing lawn to the new retaining wall. City also agrees to install sod, bushes and shrubs, to return Property landscaping to a condition similar to that prior to construction. C. No Warranties. The City makes no warranties, expressed or implied, to the Owners concerning the Plans or the reconstructed Wall. 2. Owner's Responsibilities. A. Temporary Construction Easement. Owners hereby consent and grant unto the City, its agents, successors and assigns, a temporary construction easement over, across, on, under and through the land situated in the County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit B for construction of the retaining wall. This easement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and expire upon completion of the construction of the retaining wall improvements as determined by the City. This easement shall include the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing and inspecting the retaining wall, at the will of the City, its agents, successors and assigns. The Owners grant the uses under this paragraph without divesting themselves of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes provided herein. Owners, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, covenant the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above described temporary easement premises; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the temporary easement premises; and that they will hodl the City harmless from any breach of the foregoing covenants. Release. The City hereby releases and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Property owners, agents, successors and assigns from and against any and all liability claims, losses, judgments, damages or costs associated with the plans and the City's construction of the retaining wall on the Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. STATE OF NIINNESOTA (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) OWNERS: ThefeFspomg instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Re-ee-M&r- 2P I-dd� qby J11 - & i- husband and wife. Notary Public CITY OF EDINA MIX STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on its behalf. Notary Public EDIT A Legal description of the Property: Lot 15 Auditors Subdivision Number 161 EXHIBIT B A temporary easement for construction purposes lying over, under and across the south 8 feet of Lot 15 Auditors Subdivision Number 161. O e UJ O To; Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: IV.K. From: Scott Neal Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Request to Waive Building Permit Fees for the Braemar Clubhouse Renovation Project Action Requested: Approve the request to waive the, building: permit fees for the Braemar clubhouse renovation project. Information / Background: The city typically assesses and pays the building permit fees for municipal building projects. I am recommending the City Council approve a request to waive the building permit and plan review fees for the Braemar clubhouse renovation project. The scope of this project includes the demolition of the grill to prepare the space for Tin Fish to begin their kitchen construction. It also includes a variety of facility aesthetic and functional. improvements in the restaurant seating and banquet spaces including lighting, flooring, restroom updates, tables, chairs, window treatments, entrance improvements, divider wall replacement, outdoor patio expansion and clubhouse and executive course siding and roofing replacement. The building permit fee for the project is $7,940.63. Waiving the fees allows the city to set aside more money for potential future change orders, add more value to the project, and makes the project more affordable by reducing the overall project cost. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 %k O N �RFOPA�� VO \ lees AGENDA ITEM V. A. Edina High School Student Partnership With Precision Gasket Company No packet data Oral presentation F� Information coming REPORT /RECOMMENDATION M To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: Dec. 16, 2014 Subject: November "Speak Up, Edina" Report .�COA��tiAKb Deus / Agenda Item #: V. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Action Requested: Receive report on November 2014 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about residential fire sprinklers. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014 -2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUp.Edina.org. In November 2014, the discussion topic centered on residential fire sprinklers. In this online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Given research on the effectiveness or sprinklers, should the City of Edina require all new single - unit residential construction have fire sprinklers installed, regardless of size? Why or why not? • According to the NFPA, the cost of installing a home fire sprinkler systems averages $1.35 per sprinkled square foot. Oftentimes, homeowners' can receive a discount on their homeowners insurance when a system is present. Do you think the potential benefit outweighs the cost of the system? Why or why not? • In 2013, the Edina Fire Department responded to nearly 900 fire calls, a 19 percent decrease from 10 years prior. Ten or fewer fires per year, on average, are medium to major structure fires. Do you think sprinklers would help further decrease calls and major fires? Why or why not? The discussion was open for comments between Oct. 28 and Dec. 1. During that time, 33 comments were made. Additionally, 1,951 users visited the site 2,782 times, garnering 10,243 page views. Note, during this same period, discussions on the CIP, Indigenous Peoples' Day, the Redevelopment of the Former Public Works Site, the Sidewalk Facility Map, Wooddale/Valley View and Vision Edina were also active. All commenters in this discussion were from Edina. Attached are the comments on this topic. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina LJ Horne • Discussions Sign as • • Meetin Emarl S11QLe email address... Passwee ;password... or, 3VUbOtldL orihe i U Sign in Like 0 1-Tweet. Share {1 i 0] U r >t Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideasl ► JOIN the discussion) This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Fire Sprinklers This discussion is closed. Click here to view available discussions. Sorty for any inconvenience. In October, State Law was changed to require fire sprinklers in all new homes larger than 4,500 square feet. Eighty-five percent of all fire deaths occur in homes, according to the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA). Automatic fire sprinklers cut the risk of dying in a house fire by 80 pe... 3 Topics 33 Answers ICosed 2014 -12 -01 View Discussion Topic: B, uired for All? Given research on the effectiveness or sprinklers, should the City of Edina require all new single -unit residential construction have fire sprinklers installed, regardless of size? Why or why not? 20 Responses 20 Responses i Da %idFrenkel about t month ago Yes, but its a political hot potato. Residential sprinklers have been in the national building codes for years but only a compromise with the residential building industry allowed the large houses to be required to have sprinklers. New holtses with 2 story atrhuds are a fire clwnvney which endanger everybody in a fire including fire fighters. The national assoc of fire fighter chiefs has been pushing for all new residential construction to have sprinklers. 1 Support comment... Reply to David Frenkel Paul Nelson 21 days ago I believe that Edina should stay within the code used for the State of Mn. For homes built that are less than 4,500sf, I believe this should be left up to the individual (and their insurance company) that is binding or remodeling the home. 3 Supports comment... -- -- — -- — -- — — ---- ------ -- - ..... — - - DaddFrenke121 days ago Ne[son] It would be interesting to see some general cost estimates for putting sprinklers into various sizes of homes. 1 Support .comment... G Reply to David Frenkel DonaldJames 21 days ago No! Cost of construction is high. Sprinklers add additional costs with little proven benefits. Most home fires are small and localized in a small part•of the home. Most of today's bWldiugmaterials are less flammable. There are fewer smokers (a source of home fires). If most homes were equipped with properly installed and operating smoke detectors and had a hand fire extinguisher or two this world take care of most home fire dangers. 3 Supports '.comment... I Joel Stegner, Communityiolunteer 21 days ago G. rftly to Donald James For an informed discussion, you need to look at death and injury rates (for residents and firefighters) in hogs with and without sprinkler, because what happens to people is more important than cost benefits just based on expendihnres vs. property losses. I would put a very high value on preventing a dead[ or person sustaining major bunts, which is likely to cost hundreds of thousands in medical bills and a lifetime of suffering. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner Patrick Finley 21 days ago I concur with comments from Donald James. A new owner always has the option to add sprinklers. I would not support a policy that is more imposing then what state law requires. Maybe a city code requirement that an owner must sign off if they do not want to install sprinklers. 1 Support comment... Reply to Patrick Finley 1 Matt Touraneeau 21 days ago Here's where they want to take this, build support for all structures, implement and then require it for all remodels. Keep it elective across the board which means rescind the existing law. The sprinkler ]leads are ugly, they are prone to be inadvertently damaged and set off and stop determining what goes on in my house. I can see twin hones, condo's & townhortes and any other forms of multifamily projects. But get out of the single family homes. 2 Supports comment... - _ --- - - - --- _. - -- - ------------ _ ----- ---- __- ___-- _-- - - - -._ _. — -! 1 Reply to Matt Tourangeau dim Strornhere 21 days ago Before moving to Edina, I had a newer borne that was %prickled ". I probably would not have ordered it installed, but living with it as I din, I became a fan Someone indicated that there was no data that proved it had value. I disagree - there's plenty of info out there, if you look. Even die intro to the topic in this discussion has helpfid info in promoting sprinklers. And, to those who want it as an "elective" or only on multi or large homes, I'd suggest that any building - large or small, multi or single family - can catch fire. Sprinklers put out fires, period. And ifwe start picking and choosing which codes we want our individual homes to have or not have, we eliminate the whole idea of building codes. They are established to protect us, whether they be electrical codes, plumbing codes, general building requirements, or sprinkler codes. Finally, how do we put a price on a human fife? Build 'em, 'sprinkle 'em, and add value to your home. 2 Supports comment ... Reply to Jim Stramberg Scott Busym 21 days ago Here are the facts on Dayton's sprinkler mandate upon the homeowners ofMinnesota. The Mandate estimated to increase hone- buying costs for Minnesota consumers by $10,000 - $20,000 per home. Rejecting the advice of the state - appointed Residential Code Advisory Committee and multiple bipartisan legislative efforts to block its implementation, Governor Mark Dayton included a home indoor sprinkler system mandate for many new hones as part of relatively controversy- update to the state's building code that was released today. " Govemor Dayton has ignored the facts, the advice of industry experts and the will of Minnesotans by imposing this unnecessary mandate upon Minnesota homeowners trying to build their dream home', said Shawn Nelson, President of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities. ` Houn sprinkler manufacturers will certainly benefit fi-om this mandate, but it is likely to have an impact on how families purchase homes beginning next year. The new mandate will require the installation ofhome indoor sprinkler systems in all newly built single - family homes 4,500- square -feet and above. This mandate threshold includes unfinished basements and is expected to directly impact 30 -40 percent of new homes built in the MSP region alone over the next decade. Newly built homes in Minnesota are a national model for safety. In fact, since the requirement for inter - connected, hard -wired smoke alarms in newly bolt homes has been in place, there have been zero fire deaths in Minnesota. However, sprinkler maculate supporters have stated their goal is to require hone indoor sprinklers in all single -family homes, most recently in an interview on KSTP -TV and during a public administrative hearing reviewing the state bolding code. Nelson added, "Ibis isn't a case of unintended consequences or an issue slipping through the cracks of government regulation. Governor Dayton has consistently heard from small business people, consumers and legislators who are opposed to this unnecessary mandate. Instead of trusting Families to make their own decisions, Governor Dayton has decided to raise the price of their dream home for them" FACTS ABOUT THE MINNESOTA HOME INDOOR SPRINKLER MANDATE - The 1309 Residential Code Advisory Committee met nine tunes from October 2011 through February 2012 and voted twice against requiring fire sprinklers in single- family hones. On December 14, 2011 the advisory committee vote was 10 -2, and on February 14, 2012 the vote was 8 -4 against requiring fire sprinklers in single -f unlyhomes. - Based on a recent review of subcontractor costs, a home indoor sprinkler system mandate would increase the costs of a new four - bedroom, three- bathroom hone by at least $9,000. If the hone uses private well water, as many communities in the Win Cities still do, the costs can rise to $13,000 to $20,000 once water pump and well improvements are considered. This cost does not include infrastructure, overhead, profit, taxes, commissions, and mortgage amortization, annual imintenrance, higher property taxes, or the cost if the home indoor sprinkler system were to malfunction With these costs added the mandate price rises to $10,000420,000 for all homeowners. All costs here reflect a voluntary, competitive market, not costs when a service or product is mandated through government action - Of the 43 states that have taken action to update the residential advisory code, 41 have rejected home indoor sprinkler system mandates. Minnesota join California as one of only two states to adopt this mandate. - In both 2011 and 2012, the Minnesota Legislature voted by wide and bipartisan margins to reject the hone indoor sprinkler mandate — Governor Dayton vetoed the legislation each year. In 2013 and 2014, Governor Dayton refused to negotiate a solution after the Minnesota Senate included similar language in its bonding bills. - A 2011 statewide survey sponsored by St. Cloud State University found that 87 percent of Minnesotans opposed the home indoor sprinkler system mandate. 2 Supports icomment... ___ - -------------------- Reply to Scott Busyn Scntt.Busyn 21 days ago Since interconnected smoke detectors were mandated in 1980, there have been no citizen nor firefighter deaths in a newly constructed home in Minnesota. Excuse me, why do the need sprinklers? Dayton ignored the facts and bi- partisan opposition to his sprinkler mandate. This was a pure play to appease his Big Union lobby. No!!! Edina doesn't want sprinklers in new homes!!! Guess what folks, the next step by Dayton will be to require them in existing older homes as well. Support sprinklers and you will create a $15K bill for Grandma's older home when she gets her siding replaced. 1 Support - - -- -- -- — _.._.. .......... — -- -- comment... -- — - - - -- -/ I Reply to Scott Busyn Lee Heckenlaible 21 days ago In 34 years, Pve witnessed 1 house fire. The owner of that particular fire did it intentionally. I strongly believe it should be left up to the home owner. 0 Supports comment... - - i I Reply to Lee Heckenlaible Scott BusY9 21 days ago This topic is another effort by the city of Edina to increase the cost of home ownership in Edina. Over the past two years, the powers to be at Edina have increased your home construction costs by. +$2500 demolition escorw costs +$1500 demoliton permit +$3000 -5000 engineering/survey costs +$1000 -$1500 temporary ground cover costs +$15000- $20000 sprinkler costs +$10000- $15000 street repair costs +$12000 Watershed bonds Almost $60,000 in added costs to the homeowners ofEdina! Thanks Planning Commission, Fity Council, and City Manager! 1 Support comment... Reply to Scott Busyn f Tim Hutchens 21 days ago This is gross- Here are the fire death stats and while it does%t track new and old construction, there are far from none, and one persons experience does not make that a universal truth. ttps•J /dps.mrLgov/ divisions /sfw Pages / Fire %20Deaths %20Page.aspx. Cost vs. human life, the size of homes mentioned is sickingly wastefid. Why someone thinks that need a home that large when family sizes are decreasing should be the question. 0 Supports comment... 4 1 Reply to Tim Hutchens Gordon Charles 20 days ago Question: If remodeled my home to extend it's size to greater than 4,500 s� would I be required to retrofit the entire home with sprinklers, or just the addition, or not at all since it would not be considered "new construction'? If required, it could get much more costly than the $10 to 20K estimated. 0 Supports comment.. ---------------- - - - - -- -- - ! I Reply to Gordon Charles Tom x 20 days ago The question is for ALL homes to have sprinklers installed -- ABSOLUTELY NOT. The safety statistics that have been used to justify this are based on age old data when people smoked in their family honles- -this has decreased substantially in recent years. I sold a home in Richfield many years ago. When they came to do the inspection I learned that I had to do a few things to my home before I could sell it-- things that had been changed to die law while I had occupied the house -4ke fire door to a breezeway porch and non- metallic light pulls, etc. Can you imagine having to install sprinkler system in your house when you are trying to sell and may not even be in the area at the time ? ?? 0 Supports comment... Reply to Tom x .lane Hendrickson 20 days ago My opinion is that we should stick with the state law and that is all (4,500 sq tl and larger homes only), but not extend a requirement for all new construction single unit homes to have sprinkler systems installed. Why would we do more than what is required by Minnesota state law? 0 Supports ,comment... I Reply to Jane Hendrickson Frank Thomas 20 days ago The state law is a compromise at best and should be used. We can make joust about anything safer by adding cost or rules or regulations. It is cost vs benefit. Why would this state require sprinklers at a cost of thousands when we don't require motorcyclist to wear a $100 helmet. Let the homeowner decide. 1 Support comment... - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - - -- Reply to Frank Thomas Shea Huston 19 days ago Ridiculous. That pretty much suns it up. Obviously the sprinkler companies (and probably more likely insurance companies) have better lobbyists. I've heard firefighters and other experts comment on this topic and they were all in agreement that sprinklers do nothing to save lives. This does notluarg but add cost to the public... Eke every other government boondoggle. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Shea Huston Dave Bender 18 days ago Yes, sprinklers should be required in all buildings. The cost of installation during construction seems small for the benefits -- putting out fires when there is nobody around, reducing the chance that a firefighter or resident being killed. i think it will also increase the valise of the housing stock in Elora, which will benefit all homeowners. Any action that benefits the city as a whole should be explored by the city government. 0 Supports comment... - - - - - - 4 1 Reply to Dare Bender I William David 15 days ago Fie sprinklers should be optional. Working smoke detectors and properly maintained furnaces and chimneys are far more cost effective in reducing deaths and property damage. If anything, the City could encourage new construction to have sprinklers by reducing the permit fee, but to mandate fire sprinklers in every new house simple makes housing less affordable for all. 1 Support i comment ... -4 1 Reply to William David Cjjy of Edma Home • Discussions g Sin • Items • eetines En& Surveys ema(I address... Passes !password..._, or, SigSbAffir Cottle im un Sign'In Like i�Tweet� snaca 9 tail � oe Speak zna. U) We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising familfes and doing business. Take a moment to,provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak, up, Edinal ,sat+ ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your :ideasl ► JOIN the discussion( This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Fire Sprinklers This discussion is closed. Click here to view available discussions. Sorry for any inconvenience. In October, State Law was changed to requu-e fire sprinklers in all new homes larger than 4,500 square feet. Eighty -five percent of an fire deaths occur m homes,, according to the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA). Automatic fire sprinklers cut the risk of dying in a louse fire by 80 pp... 3 Topics 33 Answers Closed 2014 -12 -01 View Discussion Topic: Cost/Benefit According to the NFPA, the cost of installing a home fire sprinkler systerns averages $1.35 per sprinklered square foot. Oftentimes, homeowners' can receive a discount on their hotueowners'insurance when a system is present. Do you think the potential benefit outweighs the cost of the system ? 'Why or why not? 7 Responses 7 Responses Dadd FIrenkel about 1 month ago The question should have a little clearer. Is this for new construction or retro7 New construction should be required. It is a safety issue just like smoke alarms. 1 Support comment... -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- --_i Reply to Dautd Frenkel r� Joel Steener, Communitywlunteer2l days ago If the cost savings calculations don't include prevention of injury and death with sprinklers, it is going to be very short of the truth. Insurance savings get at this issue, but don't necessarily entirely cover it. 0 Supports - . . - - ..... ---- - - - - -- — comment... Reply to Joel Stegner AruStrombere 21 days ago Someone can always answer this question by stating that it cost them an extra $1.35 per square &not to build their home, and they lived in it for ten years, and NEVER had a fire - what a waste of money! But I venture to say that their story would be different if their home caught fore, and the sprinkler system saved most of their property, and all of their lives. l know from experience that insurance con$nanies will discount premiums when your home is %prinkled ". Over the years, even without a fire, that initial cost diminishes with those savings. Phis - a %prmked" house has more resale value. 1 Support comment... I Reply to Jim Stromberg Scott Bus 3m 20 days ago 'ilne NFPA is biased and hors quotes a ridiculously low number. The cost fora 4500 sfhome will be a minimum of$12,000 phis added cost for inspections and permits. The new Minnesota code will also require sprinklers over finnt entries, garages, and covered decks. Watch for a big Union play here by Dayton to implement forced use of sprinkler fitters pinion installers, further jacking up the cost. Phis, don't forget mandatory annual inspection costs. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Scott Busyn t A Scott BuM 20 days ago Dayton's ultimate goal is to start with homes over 4500 square feet and then soon add all new construction. Ultimately all new and old homes will be required to have sprinklers if we allow our state an local government to force this initiative down our throats. Agaur, there have been ZERO deaths (residents or fire fighters) since interconnected sprinklers were required in 1980. 0 Supports ,comment... -- — - -- -- - -- - - - -� Reply to Scol Busyn Shen Huston 19 days ago Ridicubus. That pretty much scans it up. Obviously the sprinkler companies (and probably more Likely insurance companies) have better lobbyists. I've heard firelighters and other experts comment on this topic and they were all or agreement that sprinklers do nothing to save lives. This does nothing but add cost to the public ... like every other government boondoggle. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Shea Huston Hill , trait 19 days ago My home has a sprinkler system As far as I know it dispenses water. I'd prefer if 1 could choose my own fire suppression system so I could have one that takes into account the probable sources of !lame in a given room As it stands, if my computers ever catch on fire, I'll help the situation by pouring water over the electronics. What does the NFPA say about doing that? 0 Supports comment... __.._._------ ...-- --- .. - -.� Reply to Bill Strait Sign Up Conngc ;email address... _ Sign Up Participants City of Edina lJ Home • Discussions Si4nifinm Ideas • Meetines Emaa Sii'evs ;email address... Pascw 6199 password... _ or, Sigh: orfierp Sign In Like Tweet Share ci +i 'r 0 161 H e e 0 Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Fire Sprinklers This discussion Is closed. Click here to view available discussions. Sony for any Inconvenience. In October, State Law was clanged to require fire sprinklers in all new homes larger than 4,500 square feet. Eighty -five percent of all free deaths occur in homes, according to the National Fire Protection Agency (N FPA). Automatic fire sprinklers cut the risk of dying in a house fire by 80 pe.. . 3 Topics 33 Answers I Closed 201412 -01 View Discussion Topic: Edina's Fire Calls In 2013, the Edina Fire Department responded to nearly 900 fire calls, a 1.9 percent decrease from 10 years prior. 26 fires were in private dwellings (I or 2 family houses. Additionally, 3 fires were exposure fires (die fire started in another dwelling and spread) Ten or fewer fires per year, on average, are medium to major structure fines. Do you think sprinklers would help further decrease calls and major fires? Wiry or why not? 6 Responses 6 Responses -- Dasid Frenkel about t month ago Sprinklers do not prevent fires but can help diminish damage and put out fires. This is not a question for lire general public. It is a question for a fire fighting expert who has more information about these files or sprinklers in general If fires are in non - sprinkled houses then there woukl be no impact. 1 Support comment..: Reply to David Frenkel I_J Joel Steener,Communityw1unteer 21 days ago You should ask your firefighters and /or your chief to answer this one. If they favor sprinkling all residential construction, the City should listen. 0 Supports comment... — — - — -- - - -..— -- _._ - - - -- -� Reply to Joel Stegner Jlm Stromberg 21 days ago I agree with both David and Joel - your firefighters are your best source of input here. I would add that it SEEMS to me that "sprinkled" dwellings - large and small - would stand a better chance of being'nihme fires rather than'major' fires. But die number of 'calls' to the fire department would probably not change: even %pr inkled ", if I've got a fire, I'm calling 911. 1 Support comment... r G I Reply to Jim Stromberg C Scott Bus 20 days ago A simple and cost effective way protect a new homeowner from a fire is to install 1/211 type x drywall in die garage and a Beat sensing fire detector in the garage. A large percent of house fires start In the garage. This will provide one hour fire protection and homeowner will know there is a fire. Much cheaper than sprinklers. 0 Supports comment... 0 Scott Busyn 20 days ago i Reply to Scott Busyn Since the main topic is should Edina require sprinklers in all NEW homes, this question is a red herring as it references ALL fire calls and doesn't provide statistics ui how many NEW CONSTRUCTION fire calls Edina receives. I am guessing die relevant statistics would not fit the conclusion the Fire Chief is trying to reach by -posting this topic. 0 Supports ...----- ----- ;comment... Shen Huston 19 days ago Reply to Scott t3usyn Ridiculous. That pretty nnrch sums it up. Obviously the sprinkler companies (and probably more likely insurance companies) have better lobbyists. I've heard firefighters and other experts comment on this topic and they were all in agreement that sprinklers do nothing to save lives. This does nothing but add cost to the public ... like every other government boondoggle. 0 Supports comment... Sign Up Connec email address... Sign Up Participants y2�ih C y to fig t, Reply to Shea Huston AfL ALI 4 L 74L] To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Fe m 0 Agenda Item #: VI. A. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Discussion ❑ Date: _ _December 16, 2014 Information l] Subject- • - Public Hearing — Vacation of Public Right -of -Way Easement 5320 Kelsey Terrace, Resolution No. 2014 -160 Action Requested: Approve attached Resolution No. 2014 -160. Information / Background: This request comes from property owner at 5320 Kelsey Terrace. The existing drainage and utility easement is 5 -ft wide along the northeast property line. The applicant is requesting vacating the entire 5 -ft easement to construct elements of a home addition. The City has storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain facilities in the area but not within the utility easement. Attached is a graphic showing the location of public utilities in the area. This vacation will not impact public utilities. This area is adjacent to an outlot that does have City utilities. Staff contacted the private utilities requesting feedback. No objections to this drainage and utility easement vacation were documented. Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2014 -160. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -160 Public Right Of Way Vacation Application with sketches Notice of Public Hearing Graphic of City Utilities G: ~CENTRAL SVCSIENG DIAROW VACATIONXS320 Kelsey Terrlltem VIA Consider Vacation of Public ROM= City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -160 VACATING A 5 FT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a petition was received on November 7, 2014, from the property owners of 5320 Kelsey Terrace requesting vacation of a 5 foot drainage and utility easement; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on December 16, 2014, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the easement is not needed for public purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described right -of -ways are hereby vacated: That 5 foot easement for drainage and utility purposes, over and across Lot 1, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, as dedicated on said plat of PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION. 2. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the transfer of this property. Dated: December 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 w9SA,�ti o e �, City Of Edina, Minnesota 0j DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION o 4801 West 50 Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Phone (952) 927 -8861 TDD (952) 826 -0379 Fax (952) 826 -0390 PUBLIC RIGHT O�F� WAY VACATION APPLICATION Applicant V c-, cam. i" \ r c. Print N e - Address e- Street. �+ city/state E Zip 3 Telephone No. �~JZ, `IY s °(e—) Fax No. I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 24 -191: ❑ Street ❑ _ Alley NJ Utility Easement ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Other Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically in a Word documents to the City of Edina City Clerk: Dmangen @edinamn.go v): Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? ❑ Yes [Z No Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made un less written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. 9 Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing in full detail the area proposed to be vacated. Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of information submitted in the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. - ! request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as fol lows: Address Telephone Number Date Initiated Signatu 04/11/1014 Aecotnit No. 1001 PROPOSED - LOT 111UISION I I AREAS: FOR O OVERALL PARCEL AREA: 26.544.5 Sq. Ft. R4ff �i t Lot 1. Block 2, AREA: 20,526.0 Sq. Ft. t[Eff f New - N R Rcrnnont Outlet B. AREA: 6.343.0 Sq. Ft. S 8722'35" W 146. LXISTINC LEGAL DESCRIPTION: p um11�In lmr tarn a ttq 1, D oIX z . - ••+- s� - ALSO / // f 0161Z OT 8,, PARKW000 KNOLLS 26TH ADDITION. i i Lot 1, Block 2, PA00 1009 KNOLLS 14771 A091IION, and that port of Outlot B, PARKiY00D KNOLLS 16TH ADDITON, which Ges southwesterly of o line drown from the most northerly comer of said Lot 1, to o o paihd on t 26TH ADD /AON, distant 21.89 feet northerly of the most southerly comer of said Oullot 8 (as measured along sold easterly line). / /l l sr1N PROPOSED DRAIiVAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT: L LO,, An eosemen! for drainage and utility purposed over under and across those ports of Lot 1, Block 2, ` ` r� PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14TH A0070N, and OWN 8 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADO/T/ON, lying within o 500 foot s s stnp of property the northeasterly line of which is „\ •� � �"� , \ point on the easterly line of said Outlot 8 as shown on �1 • • °? a ` said PARKWOOD KNOLLS 26TH ADOITION, distant 11.89 fee! f th t th f d 0 11 t 0 . \ , \ 07 147.06 mcas. ' \ /\ • R =43.15 �11 e =11-as'so' rru.84 m• �ff K. �= SM NMI 0. Je IN NX z tip` EXISTING HARDCOVER 0 2,056.3 Sq.Ft. northerly o e mos 50. erly comer o soi u o �, 'S . 6u,7dn s (as measured along said easterly line) •�, �\ \` 1 �•Q—j° n �„�.• . Patios & Decks x,3423 Sq.Ft. 00 � >✓ Deck & Paco Alfa m¢ro -150 Sq.FL PROPOSED DRAl1YAGE d iJTILITY BASEMENT VACATION Entry Alloaaaee J( -50) -150 Sq.Ft. thot eosement for drainage and utility purposes over and �•� �o �,°r. Total Coverage 3,690.6 Sq.Ft. across Lot 1, Mock 2, PARKW000 KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION, as \ '!' °O 1'' Lot Arco 28,544.5 Sq.FI. dedicated on said plot of PARKWD00 KNOLLS 14TH ADDITION. \� —�'' X of Coverage = 13.6 X \ \�� PROPOSED HARDCOVER 5,320 KELSEY TERRACE ^ 0 Derotes iron monument Buildings 3,213.3 Sq.Ft. \, O0 0 Derotes found monument nnaae s r,aer, a zo,. u.. • s ODLLD Patios & Decks 1,342.3 Sq.Ft. EDINA, MN 55436 '` !' Derotes existing elev. •'•�•° ~• Ded, & Polio Albooma -150 Sq.FI. �'•( (OOUO) Denies proposed elev. i—b, O.nnr ,�, ,nry vw..r. v,e"� sea w.00.m :se ho b''- — Denotes sufoce drana0e Etry All—co 3( -50) -150 Sq.F. DIAffi- GABRIB 14237C let1D sgurE ns, DPC Doeo_vope Total Coverage 4,255.6 Sq.Ft. vm '�" oawu oeat � NOTE• ADDMON TO MATCH EXST! /G FLOOR ELEVA710AS Lot Arca 28,544.5 Sq.Ft David Handel Caustrue o. LLC X 01 Covcrogo - 14.9 X �sil m�nwm w,e sro,em>e 4.2014 LM ,sv. xw zz+u i m2D' E s �f 9 tr 0 a STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date Dec. 1, 2014, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing on Vacation of Public Right -of -Way Easement (5320 Kelsey Terr) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 15 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand a d the seal of said City this �!'L day of Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF (PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the following public right -of -way easement: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION That easement for drainage and utility purposes, over and across Lot I, Blocic 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 14T" ADDITION, as dedicated on said plat of PARKWOOD KNOLLS I ADDITION. (Open space next to 5320 Kelsey Terrace.) All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed right - of -way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Cleric Dated: December I, 2014 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard a Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov u 952- 826 -0371 o Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Y A213AV- 09-008 -6 ll Wldn -dod pjogaj a! a019Aai 3uawa8jeq) ( ®0965 ®A83AV 4!jege6 al zoslign ep sues wow /Ganmmm ep u !e sinq)eq el e za II d a} ® � salad a salpe; sai4anbl q Arthur V Basham & Teresa Basham 6653 Parkwood Rd Edina, MN 55436 Debra E Kavanaugh & John D Kavanaugh 6658 Parkwood Rd Edina, MN 55436 Clifford I Anderson & Nancy C Anderson 5300 Kelsey Ter Edina, MN 55424 w1096S ®AUBA% a Robert H Strand & Mary L Strand Richard L Marcantonlo & Carol J Marcantonlo 6649 Parkwood Rd 6517 Willow Wood Rd Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Scott D Mcleod & Judith E Mcleod Yogendra Dandlker 6512 Willow Wood Rd 5305 Kelsey Ter Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Clifford I Anderson & Nancy CAnderson 5300 Kelsey Ter Edina, MN 55436 W,,a5p3 do -dod asodxe m, jaded paaJ P ®0965 ale!dwa,6 GGaAV ash 01 Gull 6uole puag ® slage-I ®laad ASB3 City Utilities x rj ":9; O U) O � ,�4CnRPOTU`��O o 18HH To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: A. B. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering \Action Discussion F-1 Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — Vacation of Public Right -of -Way Countryside Elementary School, 5701 Benton Avenue, Resolution No. 2014 -161 Action Requested: Approve attached Resolution No. 2014 -161. Information / Background: This request comes from Countryside Elementary and Edina Public Schools. The existing utility easement is 5 -ft wide. The applicant is requesting vacating the easement so an additional can be completed on the building. The City has storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain facilities in the area but not within the utility easement. Attached is a graphic showing the location of public utilities in the area. This vacation will not impact public utilities. Staff contacted the private utilities requesting feedback. No objections to this utility easement vacation were documented. Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2014 -161. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -161 Public Right Of Way Vacation Application with sketches Notice of Public Hearing Graphic of City Utilities G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\ROW.VACATION3701 Benton Ave (Countryside Elem) \Item xx. x Consider Vacation of Public ROW.docx City of Edina • 4801 W.. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 T'Olff SyC. � - RESOLUTIO b 0. 2014 -161 VACATING A 5 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a petition was received on October 29, 2014, from Wold Architects on behalf of Countryside Elementary School, 5701 Benton Avenue, requesting vacation of a 5 foot utility easement; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on December 16, 2014, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the easement is not needed for public purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described right -of -ways are hereby vacated: The utility easement along the southerly 5.00 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, BROADMORE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, dedicated in said plat of BROADMORE ADDITION. This vacation does not intend to vacate any portion of the Easement for Roadway /Utility Purposes'recorded as Doc. No. 3211764 lying within the easterly 10.00 feet of said Lot 1. 2. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the transfer of this property. Dated: December 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) - COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov o 952 - 826 -0371 o Fax 952 - 826 -0392 y�1N��rb ti a c.� City Of Edina, Minnesota ly DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 4801 West 50" Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Phone D (952) 927 -8861 TDD n (952) 826 -0379 Fax n (952) 826 -0390 .:PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION y � � Applicant nh � m °'�°"1 f � " Print Name .. Address 5-761 PoENW AW. Streeet��,,gg City /State ( n,1 Zip Telephone No. F ax No.L�� I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 24 -191: ❑ Street ❑ Alley �/ rr Utility Easement a� ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Other Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically in a Word documents to the City of Edina City Clerk: Dmangen @e din amn.go v): , g ye-U I) Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? ❑ Yes No Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. • Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing In full detail the area proposed to be vacated. • Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACT ICES ACT requires that we Inform you of your rights about the private data we aro requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your.eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose Information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply Information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Audito , Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of information submitted in the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Number Dale Initiated I �I jj I. ��� Signature /T 4 04/21/2014 Amain/ No. 1001.4391 //• 227.7773 Easement Vacation Sketch For - TFOLD ARCHITECTS Countryside Elementary School PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION The utility easement along the southerly 5.00 feet of Lots I, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, BROADMORE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, dedicated in said plat of BROADMORE ADDITION. This vacation does not intend to vacate any portion of the Easement For Roadway / Utility Purposes recorded as Doc. No. 3211764 lying within the easterly 10.00 feet of said Lot I. BENT�N A VENUE I )n n A A/1�)[- n r%r%1-rI n l 10� BENTON L;1 \V/1VIVIkJ1 \L_ AVE. �W I W 5 J z:jQ UTILITY SEMENT PER BROADUOR ADDIT ION o TO BE VAC TED F ° 2,916 S0. F D W V / \i/ r 7A /n nn /r //'1A/ �a to LL_L G. /VU /'lLJ l / /V /V <Zn �1I W N I / < M En 0 � \ I 0_WZ, I ID I 4 v 0 0 II _. r U C W J Q U to 2008 -228 -B 729/24 T.117 R.21 S.32 SMT 2008228BOOI.dwg I hereby certify that this sketch, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 27th day of October, 2014 SUNDE AND SURVEYING, LLC. By: — - --------------- -- Leonard F. Carlson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 44890 Main Office: 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (35W) * Suite 118 uaUNDE Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 -3435 ��� ���� g *G 952 -881 -2455 (Fax: 952- 888 -9526) North Office: www.suride.com Brooklyn Park, Minn. 753- 784 -9346 PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION The utility easement -along the southerly 5.00 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, BROADMORE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, dedicated in said plat of BROADMORE ADDITION. This vacation does not intend to vacate any portion of the Easement For Roadway / Utility Purposes recorded as Doc. No. 3211764 lying within the easterly 10.00 feet of said Lot 1. � :t "_' -�' ~�', ' q•J_ 4 _.— �*=? � - �- + �- •� s __ ..^- -� Y s,-a �,,�'� '� - t 11 _ zt;Y STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE . I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date Dec. 1, 2014, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing on Vacation of Public Right-of-Way Easement (Countryside Elementary School, 5701 Benton Ave) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 15 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS i �WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this f .Lf` day of Q , Zp 1q- � 7 UR Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street to consider the requested vacation of the following public right -of -way easement: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION The utility easement along the southerly 5.00 feet of Lots I, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, BROADMORE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, dedicated in said plat of BROADMORE ADDITION. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed right - of -way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk . Dated: December 1, 2014 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard - Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov a 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 Easy Peel® Labels ` A Bend along line to 11 Use Avery® Template 51600 feed Paper ® expose Pop -up EdgeTM Slavash Shafizadeh & Mitre Sabelmeghaddan Xinying Yu & Xuemin Yang 5712 Benton Ave 1037 Cassia Way Edina, MN 55436 Sun Vale, CA 94086 Steven J Enck 5700 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 R Daniel Rasmus & Karl Fedjl, Rasmus 5812 Stuart Ave Edina, MN 55436 Leffert G 7lgelaar & Barbara A Kyle 5816 Stuart Ave Edina, MN 55436 Wendy Glenna & Lester Glenna 5714 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 Etiquettes faclles A peter ® Repliez h la hachure all in de Utillsez le abarit AVERY® 51600 r Sens de rgvdler le rebord Po -u TM 9 Al chargement P p AVERY® 5gow A Robert C Bradt & Mary H Bradt 5704 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 Junius Ho 5716 Benton Ave Edina, MN 55436 www.avery.com ; 1- 800 -GO -AVERY 1 City Utilities To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL O 1 / V/ 1� �o \�RaPBUB ��0 • Agenda item #: VI.C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014 -25 Amending Chapters 10 &'32, Regarding Regulation And Protection Of Trees On Low Density Residential Property. Action Requested: Continue the Public hearing to February 3, 2015. Information / Background: The Planning Commission considered the Tree Ordinance Amendment at their December 10, 2014 meeting, and continued the matter to their January 14, 2015 meeting. The Commission would like to continue shaping the Ordinance, and need a little more time to do so. Therefore, the.City Council is asked to continue the scheduled public hearing to February 3rd, 2015 to allow time for the Planning Commission to continue its work on the ordinance regarding trees. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMORANDUM To: City of Edina, MN From: Brian T. Grogan Date: December 10, 2014 Re: "Draft" Staff Report Background Item VI. D. Moss & Barnett The City of Edina is a member of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("Commission') along with the cities of Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield. In August 2012 each member city renewed a cable television franchise to Comcast to provide cable service within its city limits ("Franchise'. Comcast has proposed to transfer of the Franchise and cable system to Midwest Cable, Inc. ( "Midwest Cable "). After close of the proposed transfer the name of the operator will change to GreatLand Connections, Inc. The Commission retained the services of Moss & Barnett as legal counsel for review of this proposed transfer. Moss & Barnett has submitted a detailed report regarding the proposed transfer that is attached ("Transfer Report'. The application for the transfer of the Franchise requires written consent from the City after examination of the legal, technical and financial qualifications of Midwest Cable and following the conduct of a public hearing. Based on the above mentioned criteria and limited strictly to the financial information analyzed and described in the Transfer Report, the Commission does not believe that the transfer can reasonably be denied based on the information at hand. The 2012 Franchise provides a term of 10 years. Under provisions of the Franchise Comcast is authorized to construct operate, maintain and reconstruct the cable system within the City limits and within its rights -of -way. Midwest Cable will be responsible for all existing franchise agreement provisions if the proposed transfer is approved. The Transaction The cable market in the United States is about to undergo a rather dramatic transition. Two of the largest cable operators, Comcast and Time Warner Cable, are proposing to merge in a nearly $50 Billion transaction - resulting in Comcast controlling 34 million cable subscribers throughout the United States. A transaction of this size requires federal approval and there are concerns that Comcast may become too big and dominant in the cable industry. The FCC and Justice Department will issue determinations on that transaction in the first quarter of 2015. 150 South Fifth Street I Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 P:612- 877 -5000 F:612- 877 -5999 W:LawMoss.com City of Edina, MN December 10, 2014 Page 2 In an effort to make the transaction more palatable to federal regulators, Comcast voluntarily offered to divest itself of 4 million cable subscribers so that it would not exceed a total of 30 million cable subscribers nationwide — a threshold historically significant at the FCC. This voluntary divesture led to Comcast selling 1.5 million cable subscribers to Charter Communications and creating a new spinoff company for the other 2.5 million cable subscribers. The entire Twin Cities market was included in the new spinoff company. Impact on the Twin Cities What this means is that Comcast will no longer operate cable systems in the state of Minnesota. The City of Edina and the entire Twin Cities market will be served by a brand new cable operator currently known as Midwest Cable - with the name changing to GreatLand Connections in 2015 following closing of the overall transaction. Because Midwest Cable is a brand new entity, there is no ability to review its operating history in other communities or its historical financial performance. As the Transfer Report outlines in greater detail, there was limited pro forma financial data provided and therefore assessing the legal, technical and financial qualifications of Midwest Cable is quite challenging. The Transfer Report provides in excess of 10 pages of financial information regarding Midwest Cable with the ultimate conclusion that Midwest Cable will be highly leveraged and will certainly not be in as strong a financial position as Comcast is today. However, the City has limited options regarding this transfer in large part because of the sheer magnitude of the transaction as more fully described in the Transfer Report. Commission focused its attention on attempting to address customer service issues that may be impacted by the proposed transaction. Of particular concern to the Commission was the fact that Charter Communications, which operates cable systems throughout Minnesota today, will be providing significant operational support to Midwest Cable. In fact, Charter will be providing everything from telephone answering to billing, programming, email, technical support and a variety of other operational functions. Subscriber Impact Edina cable subscribers will be able to maintain telephone numbers that they have with Comcast but will ultimately be transitioned off of the "comcast.net" email domain. It is likely that the new email domain will "charter.com." Subscribers will be able to keep existing cable equipment in their homes for the foreseeable future as the company indicates that this equipment will be compatible with the new programming line -up offered by Midwest Cable /Charter. However, it is possible that further transition of that equipment may occur down the road. The Commission further focused its attention on addressing certain ambiguous provisions in the new cable television franchise related to the provision of the City's local government channel on the cable system. These clarifications will help to ensure continued, uninterrupted transmission of the City's government channel as well as all other educational and public access channels City of Edina, MN December 10, 2014 Page 3 required under the franchise. In addition, the Commission negotiated for Comcast to reimburse all of the Commission's (and therefore the City's) costs related to its review of this proposed transfer. In the end the Commission voted unanimously to approve the proposed transfer subject to the conditions contained within the attached Resolution. Staff recommendation is for approval of the Commission's proposed Resolution. 2637595v1 Comcast /Midwest Cable Transfer of Franchise Southwest Suburban Cable Commission December 3, 2014 Brian T. Grogan, Esq. (612) 877 -5340 Brian.Grogan(&-Iawmoss.com +V* Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Comcast/TWC Merger • Comcast merger with Time Warner Cable — Announced February 12, 2014 — Comcast acquires TWC's 11.4 M cable subs — Results in Comcast controlling 34 M cable subs • Requires local, state and federal approvals • Comcast voluntarily offers to divest subs — Comcast seeks to shed 4 M cable subs — Comcast seeks to get down to 30 M cable subs . ❖. 2 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Comcast TWC 34 million subscribers _T.wt,rwCaWew _ Cannt(orp ° °% SNL Kagan 4 "i *i Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Pre - Merger Cable Markets It Mt.SQ Key _ THTC W OT+H � co•ncast _ cr.sftc� ® Cstsr one M NOk", _ 5��nlrt Cable Provider Footprints Top 10 MSOs January 2011 _ rm Ilk sc.utt: Mcaxeasus * 201: ""de.z beOVCenws +s A proo ct of %ICOODL. AGp'CCuman of t'15 dacb - &W (Ofm "w-4ut _xp+Qw nnttcn pamuss.on ffzw -, Motio&2 K pfOA4Kaa. 4 Moss & Barnett r. :I essional Association Comcast /Charter • Comcast and Charter Communications — Announced April 25, 2014 — Comcast to sell 1.4 M cable subs to Charter — Comcast and Charter to swap subs • 1.51VI to Charter • 1.61VI to Comcast 4t * ** 5 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Charter Overview • Charter operates cable systems in MN — Duluth, St. Cloud, Marshall, Apple Valley, Lakeville, Rochester, Mankato, Winona and many others • Charter provides service to — 6.1 million subs — In 29 states • Charter is a Fortune 500 company — Employs approximately 23,000 people 4t * ** 6 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Midwest Cable • 2.5 M subs to be divested to new entity — Former Comcast properties in MN, MI, IL, IN, Al and others • Twin Cities Comcast systems part of spin -off • Midwest Cable —newly created entity — After closing will be renamed "GreatLand Connections" • Midwest Cable will be- publicly traded entity • New Grantee = Comcast of Minnesota, LLC • Financial review — challenging — Given lack of operating history . ❖. Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Proposed Charter +Midwest Cable (SpinCo) WA h • AA i Ira SD UN . • • • • Wy. • • -�h Moss & Barnett A Professional Association NH .• ; .. NY IVA CT ki MUDE :•. • �it� •idM • •I . Y . TN + ��••�.• h C AK •��Sr: . +•� • : z••x VS •: �} .; cr. • .• • Charter Less Divested Systems • Acquired Systems • SpinCo Note: Larger Circles Representing Major Markets 8 Who W"111 Run Midwest Cable*?. • Separate board of directors -owned — 33% by Charter Communications — 67% by Comcast Shareholders • Midwest will initially have 9 board members • Michael Willner — President and CEO of Midwest — 40 year veteran — Insight Communications — No existing franchises under its control — Much of executive team worked at Insight • Midwest has no operating history • Substantial operations handled by Charter Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Structure After Merger Comcast Shareholders (as of the record date for the spin -off) Charter Stockholders (as of immediately prior to the transactions) Approximately % 67% Approximately 33% Comcast (including cash distributed from OpCo and our notes issued to Comcast) Midwest Cable OpCo TWC (owns the Midwest Cable systems, assets and liabilities relating to the Midwest Cable systems and credit facilities) Approximately % New Charter Charter �♦�♦� 10 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Timeline for Local Action • City has right to review transfer of franchise — Under franchise, state and federal law — Approve /not approve • Official request via FCC Form 394 — Received June 18, 2014 • 120 days to issue local decision — October 18, 2014 = initial deadline — Comcast extended deadline - - First to December 15th — New deadline is now January 15, 2015 • Legal, technical and financial qualifications • Commission requested substantial info 4♦ *♦* 11 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Local Operations • Local field operational (technical) personnel — Will be Midwest Cable employees • Government affairs personnel — Interacting with local franchising authorities — Will be Midwest Cable employees • Other operational services — Will be provided by Charter personnel 4844 12 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Charter Services to Midwest • Midwest will pay Charter 4.25% of revenues — 4.25% of all voice, video and data revenues — Procurement and Programming Management Services — Network Operations — Engineering & IT — Voice Operations — Field Operations — Customer Service — Billing & Collections — Marketing & Sales — Administrative and Back office Services — Other �♦�♦� 13 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Impact on Services • Subs keep Comcast telephone numbers • Subs keep cable equipment — At least for initial transition — perhaps longer /permanently • Email — Subs will have to transition away from comcast.net — Likely to Charter's email domain • Billing — Will transition to Midwest — Online payments will require subscribers to contact bank �♦�♦� 14 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Financial Review • Outlined in Report pp. 13 -20 • Midwest's long -term debt is estimated to be — $7.8 billion • Midwest's initial debt leverage will be no greater than 5.Ox its 2014 EBITDA • Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization • i.e. how much profit is made with present assets and operations on the products sold, as well as providing a proxy for cash flow — Consistent with some other cable operators • Charter at 5.0x, • Cablevision at 5.3x, • Suddenlink at 5.7x and • Mediacom at 5.3x). �♦�♦� 15 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Resolution • Approves transaction subject to: — Written Acceptance by New Grantee • Comcast of Minnesota, LLC — Guaranty by GreatLand Connections Inc. • New name for Midwest — SD and HD (simulcast) capacity for each City's PEG channel — Verification that fiber and equipment to be provided "free of charge" by New Grantee — Customer service • Quarterly meetings with New Grantee for 2 years • Escalated complaint process maintained — Reimbursement of all transfer costs 4• *•* 16 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Conclusion • Commission to consider resolution approving the transfer • If Commission approves of resolution — Commission staff will send Report and Resolution to member cities — Commission recommendation will be included — Staff will be present for Council presentation and consideration • If Commission does not approve resolution — Commission should direct staff on next steps •'•'• 17 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association Questions? Brian T. Grogan, Esq. Moss & Barnett, A Professional Association 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 877 -5340 phone / (612) 877 -5031 facsimile E -mail: Brian. Grogan(aD-lawmoss.com Web site: www.lawmoss.com *V* 18 Moss & Barnett A Professional Association *•!s Moss& B",-;1@'rn-ett REPORT Regarding the Proposed Transfer of Control of the Cable Franchise and Cable System from Comcast to Midwest Cable (GreatLand Connections Inc.) November 26, 2014 Submitted by: Brian T. Grogan, Esq. Yuri B. Berndt, Esq. 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (P) 612 - 877 -5000 (F) 612- 877 -5999 www.lawmoss.com INTRODUCTION This report has been provided by Moss & Barnett, a Professional Association, for the purpose of evaluating a request from Comcast of Arkansas /Florida /Louisiana/Minnesota/ Mississippi/ Tennessee, Inc. ( "Grantee "), the current holder of the Cable Franchise ('Franchise") -in the member cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ('Commission"),-to approve a proposed transfer of control ( "Transfer") of the Franchise to Midwest•Cable, Inc. (hereinafter "Midwest Cable" or "Midwest "). The Grantee currently owns, operates and maintains a cable television system ( "System ") in each of the Commission's member cities pursuant to the terms of the Franchise. The Commission's member cities are Edina, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "City "). On February 12, 2014, Comcast Corporation ( "Comcast ") and Time Warner Cable Inc. ( "TWC ") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby Comcast would acquire the cable systems and franchises held by TWC among other assets. On April 25, 2014, Comcast and Charter Communications, Inc. ( "Charter ") entered into the Comcast/Charter Transactions Agreement (the "Agreement "), pursuant to which the Grantee, through a restructuring under Comcast's ownership, will become Comcast of Minnesota, LLC ( "New Grantee ") and immediately thereafter will become a wholly -owned subsidiary of Midwest Cable (the "Transaction "). Note: See pages 3, 4 and 5 of this Report for diagrams of the Transaction.' What is happening to the Twin Cities Comcast cable systems? Comcast's proposed acquisition of TWC will (if approved) result. in the total combined number of cable subscribers to be controlled by Comcast to exceed 30 million. nationwide. In an effort to reduce that number and make the Transaction more acceptable to federal regulators, Comcast voluntarily agreed to divest itself of 3.9 million cable subscribers nationwide. Part of this proposed divestiture was accomplished with the system swaps between Comcast and Charter that results in Charter acquiring an additional 1.4 million cable subscribers. The remaining 2.5 cable subscribers to be divested by Comcast will be controlled by a new publicly traded entity, Midwest Cable. In Minnesota, Comcast's only cable subscribers exist in the Twin Cities market (and small portions of western Wisconsin). As a result, the Twin Cities market was selected, along with other markets in Michigan, Illinois, Indiana and some southern states, to be included in the divestiture transaction. What this means is that Comcast will be leaving Minnesota and will no longer own the cable systems serving the Twin Cities or the City. Rather, the System will be owned by Midwest Cable. Because Midwest Cable is newly created, it will require third party assistance to address many operating issues such as programming agreements, customer service, billing, technical support and related issues. Charter will be assisting. Midwest Cable with many of these issues via a "services agreement" that will be more fully explained in this Report.' ' All diagrams are derived from Midwest Cable Form S -1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2014. 2574069v1 What will be the name of the new cable operator serving the City? In initial communications with the City, Comcast referred to.the proposed new cable operator entity as SpinCo.. Shortly thereafter.the name was changed to Midwest Cable. Midwest Cable remains,the name as of the date of this Report, but following close of the Transaction, the name will change to GreatLand Connections Inc. ( "GreatLand "): For Purposes of this report all references will be to Midwest Cable. The Transaction initially provides for Comcast's creation of.Midwest Cable an&Comcast's contribution of systems (and related business assets and holdings) serving approximately 2.5 million existing Comcast subscribers to Midwest Cable: Midwest Cable is currently a wholly owned subsidiary.of Comcast. Following the contribution, Comcast will spin -off the Midwest Cable stock to its public shareholders and Midwest Cable will become an independent, publicly traded corporation and its name will change to GreatLand. Approximately two- thirds (2/3) of the equity and voting shares of Midwest Cable will be held by Comcast shareholders and one -third of the equity; andmoting shares will be owned by Charter. Seepage 5 of this Report for a diagram of the transaction. Timing for Action by City On or about June 17, 2014 the City received from Grantee, FCC Form 394 - Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise ( "Application "). Federal, state and local law, including the terms of. the Franchise, provide the City with authority to consider the Application. The time period for such, a review is typically one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of receipt of the Application, in this case on or before October 15, 2014. On or about August 22, 2014 Comcast and Midwest Cable agreed to extend the Application review period for sixty (60) days until December 15, 2014 to allow the City time to review additional information concerning the qualifications of Midwest Cable which was provided to the City on September 30, 2014. On or about September 30, 2014 Comcast and Midwest Cable agreed to a further extension of the Application review period for thirty (30) days until January 15, 2015 to allow the City to review certain service agreements related to the Transaction as well as certain SEC financial filings to be made available for review on October 31, 2014. The current City deadline for action on the Application is January 15, 2015. What can the City consider? Pursuant to the City's Franchise, this proposed Transfer is prohibited without the written consent of the -City. Federal, state and local law provides the City with a right.to examine the legal. technical and financial qualifications of the proposed New Grantee and Midwest Cable. Following review of the Application additional questions were sent on the City's behalf to Corimcast seeking supplemental information regarding the qualifications of New.Grantee and Midwest Cable. The Transaction is complicated to describe because certain operational responsibilities will be contracted for by Midwest Cable. Both Comcast and Charter will provide certain, transition services and ongoing services to Midwest Cable which will be more fully described herein. 2 25740690 Structure Following the Comcast /TWC Merger but Before the Transactions 2574069v1 Structure Following the Spin -Off and the Charter Reorganization but Before the Midwest Cable Merger Comcast Shareholders, Charter Stockholders (as of the record date for the (as of immediately prior to the spin -off) transactions) Comcast (including cash distributed from Opco and our notes issued to Comcast) Midwest Cable OpCO (owns the Midwest Cable TWC systems, assets and liabilities relating to the Midwest Cable systems and credit facilities) 4 2574069v1 New Charter Charter Merger Sub, Charter Structure Following the Transactions Approximately % 2574069v1 5 APPLICABLE LAW In addition to the Franchise requirements which are not specially set forth herein, the following provisions of Federal law and State law govern the actions of the City in acting on the request for approval,.of the Transaction. Federal Law The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Consumer - Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( "Cable Act "), provides at Section 617 (47 U.S.C. § 537): Sales of Cable Systems. A franchising authority shall, if the franchise requires franchising authority approval of a sale or transfer,': have 120 days to act upon any request for approval of such sale or transfer that contains or is accompanied by such information as is required in accordance with Commission regulations and'by the franchising authority. If the franchising authority fails to 'render a final decision on the request within 120 days, such request shall be deemed granted unless the requesting party and the 'franchising authority agree to an extension of time.'., The Cable Act also provides at Section 613(d) (47 U.S.C. § 533(d)) as follows: (d) Regulation of ownership by States or franchising authorities. Any State or franchising authority may not prohibit the ownership or control of a' cable system by any person because of such person's ownership or control of any other media of mass communications or other media interests. Nothing in this section shall be construed -to prevent any State or franchising authority from prohibiting the ownership or control of a cable system in a jurisdiction by any person (1) because of such person's ownership or control of any other cable system in such, jurisdiction, or (2) in circumstances in which the State or franchising authority determines that the acquisition of such a cable system may eliminate or reduce competition in the delivery of cable service in such jurisdiction. Further, the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") has promulgated regulations governing the sale of cable systems. Section 76.502 of the FCC's regulations (47 C.F.R. § 76.502) provides: Time Limits Applicable to Franchise Authority Consideration of Transfer Applications. (a) A franchise authority shall have 120 days from. the date of submission of a completed FCC Form 394, together with all exhibits, and any additional information required by the terms of the franchise agreement or applicable state or local law to act upon an application to sell, assign, or otherwise transfer controlling ownership of a cable system. (b) A franchise authority that questions the accuracy of the information provided under paragraph (a) must notify the cable operator within 30 days of'the filing of such information, or such information shall be deemed accepted, unless the 25740690 cable operator has failed to provide any additional information reasonably requested by the franchise authority within 10 days of such request. (c) If the franchise authority fails to act upon such transfer request within 120 days, such request shall be deemed granted unless the franchise authority and the requesting party otherwise agree to an extension of time. State Law Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083 provides: Sale or Transfer of Franchise. Subd. 1. Fundamental corporate change defined. For purposes of this section, "fundamental corporate change" means the sale or transfer of a majority of a corporation's assets; merger, including a parent and its subsidiary corporation; consolidation; or creation of a subsidiary corporation. Subd. 2. Written approval of franchising authority. A sale or transfer of a franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental. corporate change, requires the written approval of the franchising authority. The parties to the sale or transfer of a franchise shall make a written request to the franchising authority for its approval of the sale or transfer. Subd. 3. Repealed, 2004 c 261 art 7 s 29 Subd. 4. Approval or denial of transfer request. The franchising authority shall approve or deny in writing the sale or transfer request. The approval must not be unreasonably withheld. Subd. 5. Repealed, 2004 c 261 art 7 s 29 Subd. 6. Transfer of stock; controlling interest defined. Sale or transfer of stock in a corporation so as to create a new controlling interest in a cable., communication system is subject to the requirements of this section. The term "controlling interest" as used herein is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. 25740690 TECHNICAL REVIEW The technical qualification standard relates to the technical expertise and experience of New Grantee and Midwest Cable to own, operate and maintain the System in the City following the closing of the Transaction. In this case, since.Midwest,Cable will become the ultimate parent of New Grantee; our focus is on the technical qualifications of Midwest Cable. -In, such a review, the standard of review is that the City's consent shall not be "unreasonably withheld. ";Because Charter will be providing considerable support to Midwest Cable, we have also outlined below certain qualifications of Charter and have attempted to clarify which entity will provide services in the City. Background Qualifications of Midwest Cable Midwest Cable is a newly created entity. Midwest Cable has no operating history that the City can review,nor does it have any existing franchises under its control. Midwest Cable will initially have nine board members. Midwest Cable's Executive Management Team will include the following cable and communications industry executives: 1) Michael Willner, President and CEO; 2) Leonard Baxter, Vice President, Chief Administrator Officer; 3) Matt Siegel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and 4) Keith Hall, Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs. Mr. Willner, 'a forty year cable veteran, is the former President and CEO of Insight Communications. Many members of the Midwest Cable executive team are former Insight Communications executives that worked under Mr. Willner. Midwest Cable will employ regional managers and for certain cable systems, local area managers, who will responsible for overseeing the local cable system operations of Midwest Cable. Responses to Supplemental Information Comcast and Midwest Cable provided an identical letter dated September 30, 2014 to all Twin City area jurisdictions (through legal counsels for each of the jurisdictions) rather providing a response to each of the specific questions raised by the Commission and City. Below is a summary of the information provided in the Comcast/ Midwest Cable correspondence dated September 30, 2014. 1. Will Midwest Cable have local Twin City employees? All local system field operational (technical) personnel will be Midwest Cable employees. All government affairs personnel interacting with local franchising authorities will also be Midwest Cable employees. Other operational services will be provided by Charter personnel as described below. 2. What transition services will Comcast provide? During the first year following the close of the. Transaction, Comcast will provide the following "transition services" to Midwest Cable. Some of these services will transition to Midwest Cable more quickly than others. a. Facilities and Asset - Based: Network operating center ( "NOC ") for fiber and outage monitoring; national -route fiber leases; Internet Protocol TV ( "IPTV') infrastructure and support; call centers and specialized customer care activities (e.g., home security monitoring). 25740690 b. Software Platforms: -Billing systems; customer websites and service portals; provisioning and telephony platforms; customer premise equipment support systems; voicemail and email platforms; network support tools; data warehouse; human resources and accounting systems. C. Marketing and Sales: Transition from Comcast/Xfinity branding to the Midwest Cable and Charter co- branded "Spectrum" product offering — including all of the associated market and employee- facing markings, as well as national sales channels for residential, commercial and advertising sales. d. Customer- Facinq Transition Services: Call center support;, billing systems support; provisioning of video; voice and data services; voice operations /call completion; X1 platform support; customer identity management; and email /voicemail continuity support. 3. What services will Charter provide in the Twin Cities? For an initial three (3) year term (with optional one. year extensions) Midwest Cable will contract with Charter to provide certain marketing and operational services. Midwest Cable will pay Charter a fee of 4.25 percent of Midwest Cable's total revenues (voice, video and data revenues) in return for these services. Charter background - Charter currently operates cable systems throughout Minnesota in such cities as Duluth, St. Cloud, Marshall, Apple Valley, Lakeville, Rochester, Mankato, Winona and.many others. Charter provides service to more than 6.1 million customers in 29 states in which it currently operates. Charter is a Fortune 500 company and employs approximately 23,000 people. a. Procurement and Programming Management Services. Charter will provide programming management services to Midwest Cable including negotiating and entering into video programming agreements. Charter will provide procurement management services to Midwest Cable. Examples of such goods and services are: product hardware, software licensing and employee cellular service. b. Network Operations. Charter will provide Midwest Cable: (i) telecommunications services that previously depended on Comcast in a shared service model including: network connectivity for all services including voice, video and data, Video On Demand, CPE software and provisioning management, network security and interface with law enforcement, authentication of services and network monitoring and outage detection. C. Engineering & IT. Charter will provide Midwest Cable the Corporate Engineering services previously provided by Comcast including: architectural design standards, product technical roadmaps and standards and technical roadmaps and standards. Charter will provide Midwest Cable IT services including: (i) software for back office functions including managing customer transactions and provisioning of services; (ii) management information services for accounting, billing, activity 25740690 analysis, labor management, budgeting and financial analysis; and (iii) management of data centers. d. Voice Operations. Charter will provide origination services to Midwest Cable including processing phone subscriber orders for phone installations at the subscriber's home or business. These services include: order fulfillment and provisioning and local number management and portability. e. Field Operations. Charter will support Midwest Cable under by providing field operations services including: dispatch, plant database software systems, predictive network failure software and maintenance prioritization, technician activity and productivity reporting, warehouse standards and CPE handling standards, tools, requirements and standards for technician communications, plant design and construction standards and fleet management. f. Customer Service. Charter will support Midwest Cable by providing customer care services directly or through its vendors. These services include call center services for call answering,` monitoring and dispositioningrelated to inbound sales, billing, repair; arid retention for all products and services sold by Midwest COOP including video, voice and data, online chat for sales, service and billing, online customer care portals for self -help and service and customer identity management. g. Billing & Collections. Charter will provide billing and collections services. These services include: customer billing and billing system management, collection of customer receivables and cash management and customer disconnect support. h. Product. Charter will provide Midwest Cable with: (i) customer facing product development definitions /standards /software and planning for all business and consumer products; (ii) change planning and project management services; and (iii) website hosting, video content management and web mail hosting. Any customer facing products bearing a Charter brand name shall be co- branded with Midwest Cable's brand -name in such a manner that it is clear to the consumer of such products that Midwest Cable is the party providing services to the consumer. Marketing & Sales. Charter will support Midwest Cable by providing: (i) marketing services and database support to enable mass, direct and online marketing activities; (ii) analysis of sales channel(s) performance; and (iii) development and all customer and non - customer facing messaging. Charter will support Midwest Cable by providing: (i) program design and Management tools that maximize economic sales to nonsubscribers by door -to- door sales representatives; (ii) sales channel reporting; and (iii) program design for maximizing growth in MDU environment. Administrative and Back office Services. As requested by Midwest Cable, Midwest Cable may leverage administrative services from Charter, including leveraging the associated platforms and'practices, in areas including but not limited to accounts payable, general ledger, database systems, and payroll administration. 10 25740690 4. Will Xfinity cable services remain available? Cable services will eventually be transitioned from Xfinity branding to Charter's "Spectrum" brand. Midwest Cable customer invoices will identify products and services as being "Spectrum by Midwest Cable. "2 The products and services may also be co- branded as "Midwest Cable and Charter," in certain markets. 5. Customer E -Mail Transition. Post - closing, customers will continue to use their Comcast email account until they migrate to a Midwest Cable email account. Comcast customers.will not indefinitely retain their existing " @comcast.net" email address after migrating to the Midwest Cable service, as Comcast owns that domain. However, emails sent to the customer's former " @comcast.net" email address will be automatically forwarded to the customer's new Midwest Cable email address for an "ample period of time" that is mutually agreeable to both companies. It is not clear if the email domain will be owned by Charter or Midwest Cable. 6. Phone Number Continuity. The Transaction will not require any change in customer phone numbers. Existing Comcast telephone customers will be able to keep their current phone numbers permanently. 7. Customer Equipment. Customers will be able to continue to use their current premises equipment after the .,Transaction closes. Midwest Cable will rely initially on Comcast for transition services to support the X1 platform. Midwest Cable ultimately will deploy the Spectrum product suite developed by Charter, which will include a cloud -based user interface similar to the one X1' provides. The Spectrum guide is designed to,improve significantly television search and discovery functionality. Of critical importance here, the Spectrum product is designed to accommodate current subscriber equipment (including deployed X1 boxes). Accordingly, Customers who already have X1 equipment should be able to continue using that equipment even after Midwest Cable transitions to the Spectrum offering. After the transition, Midwest Cable video customers will also have authenticated access to programming at no extra charge via the Spectrum TV App — which is compatible with the Apple iPad, iPhone, and iPod Touch running iOS6 or higher; all Amazon KindleFire devices (excep for the first generation KindleFire); and all tablets and phones running Android 4.0 and above. 8. Customer Billing. Customers will begin to see bills (at the same time of the month) from Midwest Cable and not Comcast. Approximately 15% of the customers pay online, directly from their bank (whether via recurring payments or one - time). These customers are the only customers that will be required to do anything to adjust their billing arrangements as they 2 Recall.that Midwest Cable's name will change to GreatLand Connections Inc. Presumably, the branding will be tied to the name GreatLand not Midwest Cable. 11 25740690 will be required to update their on -line banking information to direct payments to Midwest Cable rather than to Comcast. This would not occur for several months after close, and Midwest Cable will notify customers of the change — targeting customers who pay in this fashion with messaging. 9. Continuation of an Internet Access Support Program for Low Income. Households. Midwest Cable will continue to offer Internet Essentials and, overtime, may make changes to properly serve this important constituency. 12 25740690 FINANCIAL REVIEW Scope of Review Comcast Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation ( "Comcast "), is the ultimate parent company of the current holder of the Franchise granted by the City. Under the Franchise, Comcast, through its subsidiaries, operates the System that provides cable services and other communication services in the City. Comcast has requested the City's approval of the proposed Transfer of the System to Midwest Cable, Inc. (which ultimately will be known as GreatLand Connections Inc.), a Delaware corporation ( "Midwest "), an entity initially wholly owned by Comcast and subsequently spun off to Comcast's existing shareholders.3 At the request of the City, Moss &'Barnett, PA has reviewed selected financial information that was provided by Comcast and Midwest or publicly available to assess the financial qualifications of Midwest, as a publicly traded entity, following completion of the proposed transfer of the System. The financial information that was provided or available through other public sources and to which our review has been limited, consists solely of the following financial information (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Financial Statements "): 1.. FCC Form 394 "Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise" dated June 17, 2014, provided by Comcast Corporation (the "Application "), along with such other exhibits as provided therewith; 2. Form 8 -K for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2014 that includes the Comcast/Charter Transaction Agreement between Comcast Corporation and Charter Communications, Inc. dated April 25, 2014 -(the "Transaction Agreement "); 3. Form 10 -K for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2014, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013; 4.. Form 10 -Q for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2014 for the fiscal quarter and nine -month period ended September 30, 2014; 5. Form 8 -K for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2014 that includes pro forma financial statements for the Comcast Cable Systems to be Contributed to Midwest Cable, Inc.; 6. Form S -1 for Midwest Cable, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3.1, 2014; 7. The audited financial statements of Comcast Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, including Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Cash Flows and Change in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 3 Form S -1 for Midwest Cable, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2014 ( "Form S -1 ") at p. 4. 13 25740690 2012 and 2011, and the Independent Auditors' Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated February 12, 2014; 8. The draft Charter Services Agreement by and between Midwest Cable, Inc. and Charter Communications Operating, LLC. '9. The draft Transition Services Agreement by and between Midwest Cable, Inc. and Comcast Corporation; and 10: Such.other information as we requested and that was provided by Comcast relating to the transfer. Our procedure is limited to providing a summary of our analysis of'the,Financial Statements in.order to facilitate the City's assessment of the financial capabilities of Midwest to acquire and operate.the System in the City. II. Overview of Transaction As a result of the other transactions- as•discussed in Section 111 in this report and pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, Comcast has agreed to divest itself from certain assets, which includes the System, pursuant to a spin -off transaction .4 The transaction initially provides for Comcast's creation of a new corporate subsidiary (Midwest) and its contribution of systems (and related business assets and holdings) serving approximately 2.5 million existing Comcast subscribers to Midwest.5 These systems are located in the Midwestern and Southeastern United States.s Midwest is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Comcast.' Following the contribution, Comcast will spin -off the Midwest stock to its public shareholders and Midwest will become a publicly traded corporation.6 Prior to the spin -off of Midwest, Midwest will incur debt in an amount equal to five times the stand -alone Midwest assets' earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and distribute the debt proceeds to or exchange those debts with Comcast.9 Midwest estimates the amount of this initial debt to be approximately $7.8 billion.10 This transaction is subject to many conditions including federal regulatory approval, performance covenants, financing, favorable tax opinions and other requirements of the parties." In addition, Comcast and Midwest will enter into a Transition Services Agreement pursuant to which Comcast will continue to provide certain services to Midwest for a period of 12 to 18 months pursuant to the applicable statements of work. 12 After the completion of the above transactions, CCH 1, LLC ( "New Charter'), a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Communications, Inc. will acquire an approximately thirty-three Id. at p. 1 5 Id. 6 Form 8 -K for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2014 at pp. 1 -3 and Form. S -1 at p. 1. 7 Form S -1 at p. 1. 8 Id. at p. 2. 9 Id. at p. 1. io Id. " Id. at p. 2. 'Z Draft Transition Services Agreement by and between Midwest Cable Inc. and Comcast Corporation. 14 2574069v1 percent (33 %) interest in Midwest. 13 The acquisition is structured as a merger of New Charter into Midwest. 14 As consideration for this merger, New Charter will issue new stock to the Midwest shareholders which will represent about ten percent (10 %) of Charter's issued and outstanding stock after the merger transaction. 15 In conjunction with this transaction, Charter will enter into a Charter Services Agreement with_ Midwest, in which. Charter will provide Midwest with certain services, including, but not limited to corporate services, network operations, engineering and IT, voice operations, field operations support services, customer services, billing and collections, product services, marketing services,: sales, business intelligence and intellectual property licensing. 16 Charter will receive compensation for out -of- pocket costs related to these services plus a services fee equal to 4.25% of Midwest's gross revenues.17 The Charter Services Agreement has an initial three (3) year term with automatic one (1) year renewals.18 As a result of the transactions described above, Midwest will become a publicly traded company owned approximately two- thirds by Comcast's existing shareholders and one -third by Charter's existing shareholders. 19 The current Comcast shareholders will receive shares of Charter's publicly traded stock and Midwest's publicly traded stock as part of the transactions. The transactions are expected to close in early 2015.20 III Overview of Related Transactions The spin -off transaction is part of a larger group of transactions that involve Charter Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "Charter"), and Time Warner Cable Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "TWC "). The other transactions include :21 1. TWC's merger into Tango Acquisition Sub, Inc., a wholly owned, subsidiary of - Comcast; 2. Charter's purchase from Comcast of systems currently served by TWC that represent approximately 1.5 million video subscribers; 3. Charter's exchange that includes its transfer to Comcast of certain cable systems that represent approximately 1.6 million video subscribers in exchange for TWC systems that represent approximately 1.5 million video subscribers; and Charter's internal reorganization that results in the creation of New Charter. 13 Form 10 -Q for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2014 for the. fiscal quarter and nine -month period ended September 30, 2014 ( "Form 104") at p. 30. 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 Draft Charter Services Agreement by and between Midwest Cable, Inc. and Charter Communications Operating, LLC and Form S -1 at p. 70. 17 Id. 18 Id. 19 Form S -1 at p. 2. 20 Form 10 -Q at p. 29. 21 Comcast/Charter Transaction Agreement between Comcast Corporation and Charter Communications, Inc. dated April 25, 2014. 15 2574069v1 IV. Overview of Midwest Midwest is a newly formed corporation that will provide full service communications and cable services, along with other video programming, Internet services, and voice services to residential and commercial customers in certain markets in the United States.22 Midwest was formed in May of 2014 as a limited liability company and converted to a corporation in September of 2014.23 After the contribution and spin -off, Midwest will be the fifth largest cable operator in the United States. 24 After the transaction, Midwest's cable system will pass approximately 6.3 million potential customers and serve approximately 2.5 million residential and commercial cable customers. 25 Approximately sixty -five percent (65 %) of Midwest's customers will be located in the Detroit, Michigan; St, Paul /Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Indianapolis, Indiana markets.26 As of,the current time, an estimate of the number of direct employees employed by Midwest is unstated and most Midwest services will be provided by Comcast or Charter-through the separate service agreements.27 Midwest's management has an extensive background in the cable,industry.28 Cable providers and telecommunication companies operate in a competitive environment and'the financial performance of cable television operators, like Midwest and other cable operators, are subject to many factors, including, but not limited to, the general business conditions, programing costs, incumbent operators, digital broadcast satellite service, technology advancements, burdensome service contracts, and customer preferences, as well as competition from multiple sources, which provide and distribute programming, in. formation, news; entertainment and other telecommunication services.29 Midwest has no operating history as a'stand -alone company and is dependent upon Comcast and Charter for all of its essential services and operations. 30 In addition, Midwest, as a result of the transaction, will be a highly leveraged company, which may reduce its ability to withstand prolonged adverse business conditions and there is no assurance that Midwest will be able to obtain financing in the future to cover its cash,flow needs .3' The cable business is inherently capital intensive, requiring capital for the construction and maintenance of its communications systems. We specifically requested information on Midwest's capital expenditures budget, but Comcast declined to provide that information to us.32 Each of these factors could have a significant financial impact on Midwest and its ability to continue to operate the System. V. Findings We have analyzed the historical financial statements just for the assets to be contributed by Comcast to Midwest and publicly filed information, along with its Services Agreement with Charter and .Transition Services Agreement with Comcast. Midwest declined to provide us with 22 Form S -1 at p. 50. 23 Id. 24 FCC Form 394` "Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise" dated June 17, 2014, provided by Comcast Corporation (the "Application "), — Cover letter dated June 17, 2014. 25 Form S -1 at p.. 50. 26.ld. "at pp. 50 -51. 21 Id. at p. 63. 28 Application — Exhibit 7. 29 Form S -1 at pp. 8 -17. 3o Id. at p. 13. _ 31 Id. at pp. 17 -19. 32Correspondence to author "from Klayton F. Fennell, Vice President, Government Affairs, Comcast Corporation. dated July 28, 2014 at p. 15. 16 2574069v1 projected 'statements of cash flow and income and a, balance sheet for its future operations and further stated that "Comcast has not and will not provide forward looking analyses related to Midwest Cable ... ".33 Furthermore, other than the footnote disclosures in the historical financial statements which were minimal, we were not provided with the detailed information on how Comcast determined its revenue and expense allocations and its assumptions used to prepare the Midwest financial statements. Deloitte & Touche LLP, .one of -the biggest accounting firms in the United States, provided an Independent Auditors' Report dated October 24, 2014 on the Comcast Cable Systems to be Contributed to Midwest Cable, Inc. and stated the Midwest financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, the financial, condition of the Comcast assets to be contributed to Midwest. 34 The Auditors' Report states "The accompanying combined financial statement reflect the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses directly attributable to the Company [Midwest], as well as allocations deemed reasonable by Comcast Corporation, management, and do not necessarily reflect the combined. financial position, result of operations, and cash flows that would have resulted had the Company [Midwest] been operated as a stand -alone entity during the period presented." 3s These historical audited financial statements do not include transaction costs and ongoing additional costs and synergies of the new Midwest operation, including the new debt and. various new service fees for services provided by Charter and Comcast. Midwest's management has provided financial statement, as adjusted for some of these other costs and expenses that were not recognized by Comcast historical ly.36These financial statements do not include all potential adjustment items as noted in Midwest's public flings.3' As such, we are reporting our Findings hereunder based upon .Comcast's historical information as adjusted, for the assets and systems contributed.to Midwest. Overall, from a financial point -of -view, the information provided below shows that Midwest will be highly leveraged and have significant third party costs and obligations. 1. Analysis of Financial Statements. Federal law and FCC regulations provide franchising authorities,, such as the City, with limited guidance concerning the evaluation of the financial qualifications of. an applicant for a cable franchise. In evaluating the financial capabilities of a cable operator, we believe it is appropriate to consider the performance of lan.applicant based on the applicant's historical performance plus its projected or budgeted financial information along with its financial capabilities (financing). With a new company, historical information is not available. However in this case, the pro forma financial statements with respect to the assets contributed by Comcast to Midwest have been prepared by Comcast based upon its management's assumptions. We have not independently verified the Comcast management's allocations and assumptions and are relying on.the publicly disclosed information as provided by Midwest and Comcast. We believe a general review of the Midwest pro forma financial information may provide some insight into the general financial 33 Id. ' Form 8 -K for Comcast Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2014 that includes pro forma financial statements for the Comcast Cable Systems to be Contributed to Midwest Cable, Inc. "Form 8 -K ") at p. F -1. 5 Id. 36 Form S -1 at pp. 31 -36. 37 Id. at p. 36. 17 25740690 operations of Midwest with respect to the Application, but we note that there are many unanswered questions regarding Midwest's operations going forward.38 As noted above, Midwest's operations include both cable television video services and non -cable television. services., According to Midwest's financial statements, Midwest's residential video service compromised approximately forty-eight percenf (48 %) to fifty percent (50 %) of its revenue in 2013 and 2014.39 Tfie Midwest financial information.:discussed below includes all of the Midwest operations, including the non -cable television video services. We have analyzed Midwest's pro forma financial statements, as adjusted as noted below, as of June 30, 2014 sand historical financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 in providing the information in this Section. As described below, thesefnancial statements do not reflect the current fair value of Midwest's assets and liabilities, but rather the assets and liabilities are presented based on Comcast's historical cost as determined by Comcast's management.ao Specific Financial Statement Data and Analysis. a. Assets. The Comcast assets transferred to Midwest had.(i) current assets of $168 million.as adjusted; $173 million, and $152 million; (ii) working . capital of a negative $21.1 million as adjusted, a negatiye-$206 million, and a negative $196 million; and (iii) total assets of $9,043 million as adjusted, $8,999 million, and''$8;992 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.41 Working capital, which is the excess of current assets over currentliabilities, is a short-term analytical tool used to assess the ability of a particular entity to'meet -its current financial obligations in the ordinary course of business. The trend shows a slight increase in the negative working capital from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2014, and suggests that Midwest's cash flow may be unable,to meet is current obligations. Midwest's current ratio (current assets divided�by current liabilities) as of June 30, 2014, of 0.44/1 is well below a generally recognized standard of 1:1 for a sustainable business operationI.42 Approximately seventy -five percent (75 %) of Midwest's assets are comprised,of its intangible Franchise Rights and Goodwill.43 According to.Coricast, the current fair market values of Midwest's net assets is considerably in excess of the historical financial information.44 b. Liabilities and Net Equity. Midwest's pro forma financial statements show (i) current liabilities of $379 million as adjusted, $379 million and $348 million; and (ii) deferred taxes of $2,836 million, $2,842 million and $2,835 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and 2012, respe6tively.45 Midwest's long -term debt is estimated to be $7.8 billion which will have a significant impact 3e Correspondence to author from Klayton F. Fennell, Vice President, Government Affairs, Comcast- Corporation dated July 28, 2014 39 Form -S- at p. 44. 40 /d. at p.31. 41 Form 8 -K at p. F -2 of the, December 31, 2013 Financial Statements and Form S -1 at p. 32. 42 Form S -1 at p. 32. ' 43 Id. 44 Id. 45 Form 8 -K at p. F -2 of the December 31, 2013 Financial Statements, at p. F- 1 of the June 30, 2014 Financial Statements and Form S -1 at p. 32. 18 2574069vl on Midwest's balance sheet.46 The specific terms of the new indebtedness have not been disclosed and are unknown; however Midwest has used an interest rate of five percent (5 %) on its adjusted pro forma financial statements.47 This additional debt will require Midwest to generate additional cash flow, including through the operations and its service arrangement with Charter; to fund its debt service. Midwest's initial debt leverage will be no greater than 5.Ox its 2014 EBITDA, which is consistent with some other cable operators (Charter at 5.0x, Cablevision at 5.3x, Suddenlink at 5.7x and Mediacom at 5.3x).48 In order to close these transactions, Midwest and the other parties will be required to obtain certain levels of financing, which if not received would terminate the above described transactions. C. Income and Expense. Midwest's pro forma income statements, as adjusted report (i) revenue of $2,299 million and $4,470 million; (ii) operating expenses of'$1',839 million and $3,618 million; and (iii) operating income of $460 million and $852 million for the six -month period ending June 30, 2014 and the year ending December 31, 2013, respectively.49 Midwest is reporting net income in its pro forma financial statements as adjusted of $158 million ,and $272 million for the six -month period ending June 30, 2014 . and the year ending December 31, 2013, respectively.50 The ability to generate cash is important for Midwest due to its highly leveraged operations. A one percent (1 %) increase in the interest rate of the $7.8 billion of debt will result in an additional $78 million of interest expense annually. As a result of the transactions and changes in its business and business structure, Midwest will incur significant non - recurring expenses which may negatively affect Midwest's short-term income statement performance. In addition, as a result of the transaction, Midwest may be required to incur significant capital expend itu res'for the assimilation its new business and services along with additional programing costs to maintain its current programming in the future." VI. Summary Using the FCC Form 394 to establish an absolute minimum standard of financial, qualifications that a proposed applicant must demonstrate in order to be qualified as the successor operator of the System, Comcast and Midwest have the burden of demonstrating to the City's satisfaction that Midwest has "sufficient net liquid assets on hand or available from committed resources" to consummate the transaction and operate the System, together with its newly acquired operations, for three (3) months. This minimum standard is not easy to apply to a newly formed highly leveraged company with significant transaction and ongoing service costs. In general, we have also considered the standard practice of lenders that requires borrowers to maintain certain debt covenants on new and outstanding debt, including certain cash flow requirements, financial ratios and adequate security, in order to make and maintain a loan and that if a borrower does not meet these requirements, a loan may not be initially funded. 46 Form 10 -Q at p. 5. 47 Form S -1 at p. 35. 48 Letter to Brian T. Grogan, Esq. of Moss & Barnett, PA from Comcast and Midwest Cable, dated September 30, 2014, at p. 15. 49Form S -1 at pp. 33 -34. 50 Id. 51 Id. at p. 3. 19 2574069v1 Based solely on Midwest's financial information that we reviewed, Midwest's public filings assume that Midwest will receive sufficient debt commitments and the required debt to consummate the Transaction Agreement. Based on the foregoing and limited strictly to the financial information analyzed in conducting this review, we do not believe that Comcast's request for•transfer of the ownership of the System to Midwest can reasonably be denied based solely on -a Zack of financial, qualifications of Midwest, if the financing to consummate the transaction is-obtained by Midwest, as Midwest would have the funds to acquifd and operate the System.for:at.least some initial period of time. The failure to obtain the financing would result in the termination of the Transaction Agreement and proposed transfer of ownership. Due to the many uncertainties and. lack of information regarding the proposed financing and future operations, there is not enough information that has been made available to review to make any conclusions regarding the financial qualification of Midwest's ability to own and operate the System after the acquisition'and initial operating period. In4he event the City elects to proceed with approving the proposed transfer of control, the assessment of Midwest's financial qualifications should not be construed`in any way to constitute an opinion as to the financial capability or stability of Midwest to (i) operate under the Franchise, (ii) operate',its other operations, or (iii) successfully consummate the transactions as contemplated in the Transaction Agreement. The sufficiency of the procedures used in making an assessment of Midwest's financial qualifications and its capability to operate the-System is solely the. responsibility of the City. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures used either for the purpose for which this analysis of financial capabilities and qualifications was requested or for any other purpose. Lastly, in order to ensure compliance with its obligations to operate the System and since we have. based a significant part of our analysis on the financial statements, as adjusted, of Midwest, the parent entity, we recommend that the City maintain any performance bonds or corporate parent guaranty, if any, required under any City Franchise. If security funds are not required in the City Franchise, the City may wish to consider pursuing a corporate parent guaranty from Midwest in a form as set forth in Exhibit B or as otherwise mutually agreeable to Midwest and the City. A model resolution has also been attached for the, City's review and consideration as Exhibit A. 20 25740690 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE GRANTEE WHEREAS, Comcast of Arkansas /Florida/ Louisiana / Minnesota /Mississippirrennessee, Inc. ( "Grantee "), currently holds a cable television franchise ( "Franchise ") granted by the City of _ ("City"); and WHEREAS, Grantee owns, operates and maintains a cable television system in the City ( "System ") pursuant to the terms of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2014, Comcast Corporation ( "Comcast ") and Time Warner Cable Inc. ( "TWC ") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2014, Comcast and Charter Communications, Inc. ( "Charter ") entered into the Comcast/Charter Transactions Agreement (the "Agreement "), pursuant to which the Grantee, through a restructuring under Comcast's ownership, will become Comcast of Minnesota, LLC ( "New Grantee ") and immediately thereafter will become a wholly -owned subsidiary of Midwest Cable, Inc. ( "Midwest Cable ") (the "Transaction "); and WHEREAS, on or about June 17, 2014 the City received from Grantee, FCC Form 394 - Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise ( "Application "); and WHEREAS, Federal law and the terms of the Franchise require that the City take action to consider the Application within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of receipt, or on or before October 15, 2014; and WHEREAS, on or about August 22, 2014 Comcast and Midwest Cable agreed to extend the Application review period for sixty (60) days until December 15, 2014 to allow the City time to review the additional information concerning the qualifications of Midwest Cable provided to the City on September 30, 2014; and WHEREAS, on or about September 30; 2014 Comcast and Midwest Cable agreed to a further extension of the Application review period for thirty (30) days until January 15, 2015 to allow the City to review certain service agreements related to the Transaction as well as certain SEC financial filings to be made available for review on October 31, 2014; and WHEREAS, Section of the Franchise requires the City's advance written consent prior to the Grantee's transfer of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, as a result of the proposed Transaction Grantee has requested consent from the City to the proposed transfer of the Franchise; and 1 A -1 25740690 WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed Transaction, and based on information provided by Grantee and Midwest Cable and on the information received by the City from the Southwest Suburbs Cable Commission ( "Commission "), the City has elected to approve the proposed Transaction subject to certain conditions as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of hereby resolves as follows: 1. All of the above recitals are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. The Franchise is in full force and effect and Grantee is the lawful holder of the Franchise. 3. New Grantee will be the lawful holder of the Franchise after completion of the Transaction. 4. The City hereby consents and approves of the proposed Transaction subject to the below conditions. a. New Grantee agreeing to assume any and all liabilities, known and unknown, under the Franchise. b. Within twenty (2 0) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, New Grantee shall execute and file with the City the Acceptance and Agreement attached hereto to verify New Grantee's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Resolution; and C. Within thirty (30) days following close of the Transaction, Midwest Cable (also to be known as GreatLand Connections Inc.) shall execute and provide the City with the Corporate Parent Guaranty attached hereto and incorporated by reference. d. New Grantee shall provide both SD and HD (simulcast) capacity for the City's government access PEG channel - identical to what the Grantee currently provides to the City of Edina, Minnesota under the Franchise. e. New Grantee shall maintain and provide (as Grantee currently provides), free of charge to the City, Commission and the Commission's member cities, the existing PEG playback transmission connectivity and Comcast fiber and coax cable in the following manner:. i. All fiber coming to and from the existing Comcast Head end building - 10210 Crosstown Circle necessary for Commission PEG transmissions. ii. New Grantee shall provide, maintain and replace any existing routers, switching equipment and related facilities at the headend that A -2 2574069x1 25740690 .; may be required to maintain,the same PEG access functionality as Grantee currently provides and as otherwise required by the Franchise. iii: The City, Commission and Commission's member cities shall have the right to continue to use maintain the fiber & splice points at 10210 Crosstown Circle. iv. In the event headend is relocated from 10210 Crosstown Circle, all costs and expenses required to maintain the PEG playback transmission connectivity and Comcast fiber and coax cable shall be provided by New Grantee free of charge to the City, Commission and the Commission's member cities. V. New Grantee shall provide, maintain and replace the existing termination equipment (Modulators) to facilitate the PEG programming transmission to. each of the Commission's member cities in following amounts - Edina (6), Richfield (1), Hopkins (1), and Minnetonka (1). f. New Grantee will participate in quarterly meetings with members of the Commission or the Commission's designees for the first two (2) years following the close of the Transaction to verify that subscriber issues and concerns are being addressed by New Grantee or any other entity that may have interaction with subscribers within the City. If issues are not being addressed, New Grantee agrees to meet with Commission and City staff, as directed, to explain steps being undertaken to address subscriber concerns and New Grantee will provide regular and timely updates to the Commission to provide verification of corrective actions being undertaken to address unresolved issues. g.. New Grantee will maintain an "escalated complaint program" to escalate unresolved cable television complaints from subscribers. One or more specifically identified employee(s) of New Grantee shall be available to Commission or City staff via email for reporting issues. These specifically identified employee(s) of New Grantee will have the ability to escalate service issues to a senior officer of New Grantee or New Grantee's parent company when necessary. New Grantee will follow -up with Commission or City staff by email or by phone with a summary of the results of the complaint(s). h. New Grantee's compliance with the requirements of paragraphs c, d, e, and f of this Resolution shall be handled under the Franchise. New Grantee shall be subject to available enforcement procedures and remedies as if these obligations were set forth in the Franchise. i. Comcast shall, within twenty (20) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, fully reimburse City for all of City's reasonable costs and expenses in connection with the City's review of the proposed Transaction, including without limitation, all costs incurred by the City for experts and attorneys retained by City to assist in the review as well as notice and publication costs ( "Reimbursement "). A -3 i. The Reimbursement shall not be deemed to be "Franchise ,.Fees" Within the meaning of Section 622 of the Cable Act (47 U.S.C. §542)•, nor shall the Reimbursement be deemed to be (i) "payments in kind" or any involuntary payments chargeable against the Franchise Fees to be paid to the City by New Grantee pursuant to the Franchise. ii. The Reimbursement shall be considered a requirement or charge incidental to the awarding or enforcing of the Franchise... L 5. In the event the proposed Transaction contemplated by the foregoing resolution is not completed, for any reason, the City's consent shall not be effective. If any of the conditions set forth herein are not met, the City's consent to the proposed Transaction shall be null and void and of no effect. This Resolution shall take effect and continue and remain in effect from and after,the date of its passage, approval, and adoption. Approved by the City of , Minnesota this day of , 2014. ATTEST: CITY OF , MINNESOTA By: By: Its: Its: 0 A-4 25740690 ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT Comcast of Minnesota, LLC hereby accept this Resolution No. ( "Resolution ") and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Resolution and the terms and conditions of the Franchise referenced within the Resolution. Dated this day of 2014. Comcast of Minnesota, LLC By: Its: SWORN TO BEFORE ME this day of , 2014. NOTARY PUBLIC A -5 2574069v1 EXHIBIT B CORPORATE PARENT GUARANTY THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of 201_ (this "Agreement "), by and`among GreatLand Connections Inc. (f /k/a Midwest Cable, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Guarantor"), the City of Minnesota ( "Franchising Authority "), and a ( "Company "). WITNESSETH. WHEREAS, on , 20 the Franchising Authority adopted Ordinance No. granting a Cable Television Franchise which is now held by. (the "Franchise "), pursuant to which the Franchising Authority has granted the,rights,to own, operate, and maintain a cable television system ( "System "); and WHEREAS; pursuant to the Comcast/Charter Transaction Agreement dated April 25, 2014 by andbetween Charter Communication, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Comcast Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, ( "Agreement "), the Franchise will be transferred to the Company and the Guarantor will acquire control of the Company as an indirect'subsidiary of Guarantor as a result of Comcast Corporation's contribution and spin off of certain cable television systems pursuant to-the Agreement ( "Change in Control "); and WHEREAS, Company and Comcast Corporation have requested the consent to the Change of Control in accordance with the requirements of Section _ of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , dated '20 Franchising Authority conditioned its consent to the Change of Control on the issuance by Guarantor of a corporate parent guaranty guaranteeing certain obligations of Company under the Franchise. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, in consideration of the approval of the Change of Control, Guarantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agrees to provide all the financial resources necessary for the observance, fulfillment and performance of the obligations of the Company under the Franchise and also to be legally liable.for performance of said obligations incase of default. by or revocation or termination for default of the Franchise. This Agreement, unless terminated, substituted, or canceled, as provided herein, shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of the term of the Franchise. B-1 25740690 Upon substitution of another Guarantor. reasonably satisfactory to the Franchising Authority, this Agreement may be terminated, substituted, or canceled upon thirty (30) days prior written notice from Guarantor to the Franchising Authority and the Company. Such termination shall not affect liability incurred or accrued under this Agreement prior to the effective date of such termination or cancellation. GREATLAND CONNECTIONS INC. (F /K/A MIDWEST CABLE, INC.) By: Its: STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of 20_, by , the of B -2 25740690 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -164 APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE GRANTEE WHEREAS, Comcast of Arkansas /Florida/Louisiana / Minnesota /Mississippi/Tennessee, Inc. ( "Grantee "), currently holds a cable television, franchise ( "Franchise ") granted by the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City "); and WHEREAS, Grantee owns, operates and maintains a cable television system in the City ( "System ") pursuant to the terms of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2014, Comcast Corporation ( "Comcast ") and Time Warner Cable Inc. ( "TWC ") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2014, Comcast and.Charter Communications, Inc. ( "Charter ") entered into the Comcast/Charter Transactions Agreement (the "Agreement "), pursuant to which the Grantee, through a restructuring under Comcast's ownership, will become Comcast of Minnesota,. LLC ( "New Grantee ") and immediately thereafter will become a wholly -owned subsidiary of Midwest Cable, Inc. ( "Midwest Cable ") (the "Transaction "); and WHEREAS, on or about June 17, 2014 the City received from Grantee,. FCC Form 394 - Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise ( "Application "); and WHEREAS, Federal law and the terms of the Franchise require that the City take action to consider the Application within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of receipt, or on or before October 15, 2014; and WHEREAS, on or about August 22, 2014 Comcast and Midwest Cable agreed to extend the Application review period for sixty (60) days until December 15, 2014 to allow the City time to review the additional information concerning the qualifications of Midwest Cable provided to the City on September 30, 2014; and WHEREAS, on or about September 30, 2014 Comcast and Midwest Cable agreed to a further extension of the Application review period for thirty (30) days until January 15, 2015 to allow the City to review certain service agreements related to the Transaction as well as certain SEC financial filings to be made available for, review on October 31, 2014; and WHEREAS, Section 2.7 of the Franchise requires the City's advance written consent prior to the Grantee's transfer of the Franchise; and WHEREAS,,as a result of the proposed Transaction Grantee has requested consent from the City to -the proposed transfer of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed Transaction, and based on information provided by Grantee and Midwest Cable and on the information received by the City from the Southwest Suburbs Cable Commission ( "Commission "), the City has elected to approve the proposed Transaction subject to certain .conditions as set forth herein. 2630874v1 Resolution No. 2014 -164 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby resolves as follows: 1. All of the above recitals are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. The Franchise'is in full force and effect and Grantee is the lawful holder of the Franchise. 3. New Grantee will be the lawful holder of the Franchise after completion of the Transaction. 4. The City hereby consents and approves of the proposed Transaction subject to the below conditions-. a. New Grantee agreeing to assume any and all liabilities, known and unknown, under the Franchise. b. Within twenty (20) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, New Grantee shall execute and file with the City the Acceptance and Agreement attached hereto to verify New Grantee's compliance.with the terms and conditions of this Resolution; and C. Within thirty (30) days following close of the Transaction, Midwest Cable (also to be known as GreatLand Connections Inc.) shall execute and provide the City with the Corporate Parent Guaranty attached hereto and incorporated by reference. d New Grantee shall provide both SD and HD (simulcast) capacity for the City's government access PEG channel - identical to what the Grantee currently provides to the City of'Edina, Minnesota under the Franchise. e. New Grantee shall maintain and provide (as Grantee currently provides), free of charge to the City, Commission and the Commission's member cities, the existing PEG playback transmission connectivity and Comcast fiber and coax cable in the following manner: i. All fiber coming to and from the existing Comcast Head end building - 10210 Crosstown Circle necessary for Commission PEG transmissions. ii. New Grantee shall provide, maintain and replace any existing routers, switching equipment and related facilities at the headend that may be required to maintain the same PEG .access functionality as Grantee currently provides and as otherwise required by the Franchise. iii. The City, Commission and Commission's member cities shall have the right to continue to use maintain the fiber & splice points at 10210 Crosstown Circle. 2630874v1 Resolution No. 2014 -164 Page 3 iv. In the event headend is relocated from 10210 Crosstown Circle, all costs and expenses required to maintain the PEG playback transmission connectivity and Comcast fiber and coax cable shall be provided by New Grantee free of charge to the City, Commission and the Commission's member cities. V. New Grantee shall provide, maintain and replace the existing termination equipment (Modulators) to facilitate the PEG.programming transmission to each of the Commission's member cities,,infollowing amounts - Edina (6), Richfield (1), Hopkins (1), and Minnetonka (1). f. New Grantee will participate in quarterly meetings with members of the Commission or the Commission's designees for the first two (2) years following the close of the Transaction to verify that subscriber, issues and concerns are being addressed by New Grantee or any other entity that may have interaction with subscribers within the City. If issues are not being addressed, New Grantee agrees to meet with Commission and. City staff, as directed, to explain steps being undertaken to address subscriber concerns and New Grantee will provide regular and timely updates to the Commission to provide. verification of corrective actions being undertaken to address unresolved issues. g. New Grantee will maintain an "escalated complaint program" to escalate unresolved cable television complaints from subscribers. One or more specifically identified employee(s) of New Grantee shall be available to Commission or City staff via email for reporting issues. These- specifically identified employee(s) of New Grantee will have the ability to�escalate service issues to a senior officer of New Grantee or New Grantee's parent company when necessary. New Grantee will follow -up with Commission or City staff by email or by phone with -a summary of the results of the complaint(s). h. New Grantee's compliance with the requirements of paragraphs c, d, e, f, and g of this Resolution shall be handled under the Franchise. New Grantee shall be subject to available enforcement procedures and remedies as if these obligations were set forth in the Franchise. L Comcast shall, within twenty (20) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, fully reimburse City for all of City's reasonable costs and expenses in connection with the City's review of the proposed Transaction, including without limitation, all costs incurred by the City for experts and attorneys.retained by City to assist in the review as well as notice and publication costs ('Reimbursement "). i. The Reimbursement shallnot'be deemed to.be "Franchise Fees" , within the meaning of Section 622 of the Cable Act (47 U.S.C. §542), nor shall the Reimbursement be deemed to be (i) "payments in kind" or any involuntary payments chargeable against the Franchise Fees to be paid to the City by New Grantee pursuant to the Franchise. 2630874v1 Resolution No. 2014 -164 Page 4 ii. The Reimbursement shall be considered a requirement or charge incidental to the awarding or enforcing of the Franchise. 5. In the event the proposed Transaction contemplated by the foregoing resolution is not completed, for any reason, the City's consent shall not be effective. If any of the conditions set forth herein are not met, the City's consent to the proposed Transaction shall be null and void and of no effect. This Resolution shall take effect and continue and remain in effect from and after the date of its passage, approval, and adoption. Dated: December 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Its: 4 2630874v1 Its: City Clerk Resolution No. 2014 -164 Page 5 ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT Comcast of Minnesota, LLC hereby, accept this Resolution No. ( "Resolution ") and agree to be bound by the terms and ,conditions of this Resolution and the terms and conditions of the Franchise referenced within the Resolution. Dated this day of 2014. COMCAST OF,MINNESOTA, LLC Bv: Its: SWORN TO BEFORE ME this _ day of , 2014. NOTARY PUBLIC 5 2630874v1 CORPORATE PARENT GUARANTY THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of 201_ (this "Agreement "), by and among GreatLand Connections Inc. (f /k/a Midwest Cable, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, (the "Guarantor ") the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "Franchising Authority "), and , a , ( "Company "). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on 20_ the Franchising Authority adopted Ordinance No. granting a Cable Television Franchise which is now held by (the "Franchise "), pursuant to which the Franchising Authority has granted the rights to own, operate, and maintain a cable television system ( "System "); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Comcast/Charter Transaction Agreement dated April 25, 2014 by and between Charter Communication, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Comcast Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, ( "Agreement "), the Franchise will be transferred to the Company and the Guarantor will acquire control of the Company as an indirect subsidiary of Guarantor as a result of Comcast Corporation's contribution and spin off of certain cable television systems pursuant to the Agreement ( "Change in Control "); and WHEREAS, Company and Comcast Corporation have requested the consent to the Change of Control in accordance with the requirements of Section of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , dated 20_, Franchising Authority conditioned its consent to the Change of Control on the issuance by Guarantor of a corporate parent guaranty guaranteeing certain obligations of Company under the Franchise. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, in consideration of the approval of the Change of Control, Guarantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agrees to provide all the financial resources necessary for the observance, fulfillment and performance of the obligations of the Company under the Franchise and also to be legally liable for performance of said obligations in case of default by or revocation or termination for default of the Franchise. This Agreement, unless terminated, substituted, or canceled, as provided herein, shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of the term of the Franchise. 2630874v1 Upon substitution of another Guarantor reasonably satisfactory to the Franchising Authority, this Agreement may be terminated, substituted, or canceled upon thirty (30) days prior written notice from Guarantor to the Franchising Authority and the Company. Such termination shall not affect liability incurred or accrued under this Agreement prior to the effective date of such termination or cancellation. GREATLAND CONNECTIONS INC. (F /K/A MIDWEST CABLE, INC.) By: Its: STATE OF ) `) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of 20_, by , the of z 2630874v1 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. A. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -162 Setting 2015 Tax Levy And Adopting 2015 Operating Budget Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2014 -162 Setting 2015 Tax Levy And Adopting 2015 Operating Budget Information / Background: The City started the 2014 -2015 Budget development process early in 2013 and on December 17, 2013, Council adopted the 2014 -2015 Budget., The rationale behind a two -year budget is to spend more time in the second year working on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and less time making changes to the operating budget. The City has followed that plan during 2014, making relatively minor changes to the 2015 budget while reviewing all the details of the CIP. Important dates for the 2015 Budget and CIP process were: • May 2014 public engagement effort on Speak Up, Edina! • May 28, 2014 Executive Leadership Team (ELT) staff meeting was the official kickoff for staff level work on the process. • August 19, 2014 work session, Council and staff discussed the budget and CIP process and targets. • On September 16, 2014, Council adopted a preliminary tax levy. • October - November 2014 the City solicits resident feedback through Speak Up, Edina! and a paper survey. • November 18, 2014 work session, Council and staff review the staff recommended CIP. • December 2, 2014, Council held a public hearing on the proposed 2015 Budget and levy. • December 16, 2014, Council is required to adopt a final 2015 Budget and levy that staff will certify to the county auditor. The final levy may be lower, but cannot be any higher than the preliminary levy adopted in September. The attached resolution will set the final 2015 tax levies of $22,933,958 for the General Fund, $20,000 for the Arts and Culture Fund, $1,617,072 for the Construction Fund to be used for equipment replacement, $944,400 for city hall debt (year 14), $409,440 for gymnasium debt (year 11), $441,940 for fire station debt (year 8), $1,546,600 for public works facility debt (year 7), and $1,168,000 for sports dome project debt (year 1). The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $618,600 for park referendum debt service (year 19). City of Edina • 4801 W. 501 St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION. Page 2 These tax levies are equal to the preliminary levies set by the City Council on September 16. The County used these tax levies to calculate and mail parcel - specific notices to property owners. The attached resolution reflects the budget and levies as presented for the December 2 Truth in Taxation hearing.. Attachment: Resolution No. 2014 -162 Setting 2015 Tax Levy And Adopting 2015 Operating Budget Proposed 2015 Budget REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -162 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 2015, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR YEAR 2015, PAYABLE IN 2015 Page 3 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Budgets for. all Governmental Funds for the'City of Edina for the - calendar year 2015 is hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: FUND BALANCE E - f (3,615,787) S (351,303).$ - $ 112,446 $ (232,800) $ 20,093 $ 577,785 $ (518,951) $ (937,705) $ (4,946.222) 2015 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS Braemar Arts & Debt ?nvironmental General HRA PACS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund .Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total ` REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 22,933,958 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 E 5,128,980 $ - $ 1,617,072 $ 29,700,010 Reductions (123,000) (123,000) Neoax revenue 22.810.958 20,000 5,128,980 1,617,072 r 29,577,010 Tax increments - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 Franchise fees 770,000 - 1,200,000 - - - - - 100,000 2,070,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - 2,083,699 - 1,909,290 3.992,997 Licenses and permits 3,830,080' - - - - - - - - 50,000' 3,880,080 Intergovernmental 1,113,500 - - 100,000 115.325 - - - - 3,725,000' 5,053,825 Charges for services 3,969,494' - - - - - - - - 50,000 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - - - - - - - - - 950,000 Investment income 150,000 94,000 - - 300 200 - 20,000 - 62,900 327,400 Other revenue 461,100 - - - 57,821 7,000 23,000 - - 580,000 1,128,921 Transfers 765,100 - - - - - - - - 300,000 1,065,100 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - 4,599,895s 4,599,895 Other financing sources TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCINGS SOURCES $ 34,820,232 $ 194,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 100,000 $ 173,446 $ 7,200 r$ 43,000 $ 7,232,679 r$ - $ 12.994,165 $ 56.764,722 l EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 1,619,238 $ 3,809,787 $ - E - E - $ - E - E - S - E 25.000 $ 5,454,025 Communication & tech. 1,040,674 - - - - - - - - 465,900 1,506,574 Human resources 695,637 - - - - - - - - - 695,637 Finance 904,918 - - - - - - - - - 904,918 Public works 8,459,610 - - - - - - - 327,036 776,872 9,563,518 Engineering 1,735,095 - 1,551,303 - - - - - - 10,463,193 13,749,591 Police 10,357,415 - - - 61,000 - - - - 905,000 11,323,415 Fire 7,007,398 - - - - - - - 41,000 86,549 7,134,947 Parks & recreation 1.388,087 - _ - - 240,000 22,907 - 150,915 852,178 2,654,087 Community development 1,612,160 - - 100,000 - - - - - 30,000 1,742,160 Debt service - - - - - - 6,654.894 - - 6,654,894 Transfers 3271178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820,232 $ 3,809,787 $ 1,551,303 $ 100,000 $ - 61,000 $ 240,000 $ 22,907 $ 6,654,894 $ 518,951 $ 13,931,870 $ 61,710,944 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $ 24.798.774 $ 118,467 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,559 $ 25,023,800 Contractual services 4,469,594 6,120 23,000 100,000 56.000 - 21,057 - - 146,721 4,822,492 Commodities 1,773,292 200 28,000 - 5.000 - 1,850 - - 71,720 1,880,062 Central services 3,778,572 - 81,744 - - - - - - - 3.860.316 Equipment - - - - - 40,000 180.60E 1,526,372 1,746,978 Capital outlay 3,685,000' 1.418,559 - - 200,000 - - 338,345 11,753,320' 17,395,224 Debt service - - - - - - 6.654.894 - - 6,654,894 Transfers 327,178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820,232 $ 3,809,787 $ 1,551,303 E 100,000 E 61,000 $ 240,000 $ 22,907 $ 6,654,894 $ 518,951 $ 13,931,870 $ 61,710.944 CHANGEIN r FUND BALANCE E - f (3,615,787) S (351,303).$ - $ 112,446 $ (232,800) $ 20,093 $ 577,785 $ (518,951) $ (937,705) $ (4,946.222) REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Section 2: The Budgets for all Enterprise Funds for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2015"is hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: 2015 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Aquatic Golf Sports Art ,Administration $ - Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Finance Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 13,350.060 Operating revenues $ 19,433,473 $ 14,367,118 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,014,025 $ '2.017,519 $ 381,860 $ 445,950 $ 1,354,800 $ 786,000 $42,823,745 Intergovernmental 116,000 - - 441,408 116,000 Investment income 96.556 441,408 Parka and recreation " 938,625 15,000 25,000 136,556 Other revenue 56.527 1,616,747 1,014,860 - Transfers 100,000 3,000 - - 59,527 Transfers 485,000 230,000 - 243,578 253,600 1,212,178 TOTAL REVENUES AND - $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625 $ 3,358.756 TRANSFERS IN $ 19,702,556 $ 14,367,118 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,499,025 $ 2,247.519 $ 381,860 $ 692,528 L_1,623,400 $ 811.000 $44,348,006 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT ,Administration $ - $ 12,506.524 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12,506,524 Finance 286,381 - 286,381 Public works 13,350.060 13.350,060 Engineering 177,000 177,000 Police 441,408 441,408 Parka and recreation " 938,625 3,358,756 2,423,956 554,090 683,306 1,616,747 1,014,860 10,590,340 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625 $ 3,358.756 $ 2,423,956 $ 554,090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,301.813 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ $ 10,198,628 $ 46,000 $ 225,200 $ 85,000' $ $ 23,000 $ 105,000 $ 14,000 $ 10,696,828 Personal services 1,732,897 1,419,298 371.593 1,453,368 885,513 54,440 449,431 745.581 623,683 7,735,804 Contractual services 6,723.540 522.928 162,300 596,800 612,750 171,650 101,175 362,650 177,625 9,431,418 Commodities 999,500 63,150 89,650 380,800 96,950 3,000 48.300 183,450 108,300 1,973,100 Central services 708,588 227,520 27,108 132,588 58,836 35.400 53,316 51,252 1,294,608 Depreciation 3,487,500 75,000 236,500 570,000 545.000 325,000 26,000 166,750 40,000 5.471,750 Interest 602,824 - 5,474 139.907 - - 748,205 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938.625 $ 3,358,756 $ 2,423,956 $ 554,090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,301,813 CHANGE IN NET POSITION $ 5,347,707 $ 10,494 $ 84,375 $ 140,269 $ (176,437) $ (172,230) $ 9,222 $ 6,653 $ (203,860) $ 5,046,193 Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts hereinafter set forth: GENERAL FUND $ 22,933,958 ARTS & CULTURE FUND $ 20,000 CONSTRUCTION FUND - EQUIPMENT LEVY $ 1,617,072 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP BONDS - SERIES 2010A $ 944,400 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT $ 409,440 BONDS - SERIES 2005A LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP BONDS - SERIES 2007A $ 441,940 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY $ 1,546,600 DEBT REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT $ 1,168,000 BONDS — SERIES 2014 TOTAL LEVY $ 29,081,410 Page 5 Section 6. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and canceling the portion of the levy not required to produce the following amount: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 1996B/2005A/2014B $ 618,600 Passed and adopted by the City Council on December 16, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk NOTE 1: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station, public works and sports dome levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from the calculation of "Tax Capacity Levy Increase ". This explains why Tax Capacity Levy Increase does not equal Total Property Tax Levy Increase. NOTE 2: The City began working on construction and financing for a Sports Dome in fall 2013. Accurate figures were not available when the City adopted the 2014 -2015 budget in fall 2013 so the numbers in that document are different from the numbers shown here. 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA BUDGET 2015 Tax Levies Budget Budget 2011 2012 2013 2014 20I5 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy $ 21,004,000 $ 21,604,402 $ 21,824,894 $ 22,509,403 $ 22,933,958 General Fund Subtotal 21,004,000 21,604,402 21,824,894 22,509,403 22,933,958 Increase From Prior Year ( %) 1.29% 2.86% 1.02% 3.14% 1.89% Arts and Culture Fund Levies Arts and culture - - - = 20,000 Arts and Culture Fund Subtotal - - - - 20,000 Increase From Prior Year ( %) Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 949,850 950,800 949,850 947,600 944,400 Equipment Certificates 164,010 67,500 - - - Gymnasium Debt Service 396,444 411,644 396,444 409,244 409,440 Fire Station Debt Service 431,544 432,744 431,544 441,944 441,940 Public Works Facility Debt Service 1,232,460 1,178,202 1,536,743 1,526,809 1,546,600 Sports Dome NOTE 2 - - - - 1,168,000 Park Bond Market Value Levy 615,837 61 0,862 615,837 627,800 618,600 Debt Service, Fund Subtotal 3,790,145 3,651,752 3,930,418 3,953,397 5,128,980 Increase From Prior Year ( %) -0.65% -3.65% 7.63% 0.58% 29.740/a NOTE 2 Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 Construction Fund Subtotal 992,072 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 Increase From Prior Year ( %) 5.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 63.00% Total Property Tax Levy $ 25,786,217 $ 26,248,226 $ 26,747,384 $ 27,454,872 $ 29,700,010 Increase From Prior Year ( %) 1.15% 1.79% 1.90% 2.65% 8.18% NOTE 2 Tax Capacity Levy Increase NOTE i 1.12% 1.86% 1.93% 2.66% 8.40% NOTE 2 NOTE 1: Tax capacity levies include the general fund, city hall, equipment, gymnasium, fire station, public works and sports dome levies. The Park Bond Market Value Referendum levy is a market value levy, and is excluded from the calculation of "Tax Capacity Levy Increase ". This explains why Tax Capacity Levy Increase does not equal Total Property Tax Levy Increase. NOTE 2: The City began working on construction and financing for a Sports Dome in fall 2013. Accurate figures were not available when the City adopted the 2014 -2015 budget in fall 2013 so the numbers in that document are different from the numbers shown here. 12/10/2014 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 19,965,670 $ CITY OF EDINA $ 20,380,412 12.9% $ 17,960,549 Consolidated 2015 Budget Communications & tech. 1,041,718 1,182,968 2012 2013, 2014 1,506,574 2015 Human.resources 445,893 Actual Actual Budget -8.6% Budget 695,637 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Finance 717,345 782,101 1,187,619 Property tax levy $ 25,838,422 $ 26,891,756 $ 27,454,872 2.1% $ 29,700,010 8.2% Reductions - 5.7% (119,000) NA (123,000) 3.4% Net tax revenue 25,838,422 26,891,756 27,335,872 1.7% 29,577,010 8.2% Tax increments 3,536,935 3,981,938 3,900,000 -2.1% 100,000 -97.4% Franchise fees 815,530 1,891,967 2,070,000 9.4% 2,070,000 0.0% Special assessments 4,975,641 4,884,510 3,321,571 -32.0% 3,992,997 201% Licenses and permits 3,155,351 4,150,512 3,302,865 -20.4% 3,880,080 17.5% Intergovernmental 2,269,610 2,998,553 4,574,189 52.5% 5;169,825 13.0% Charges for services 3,708,482 3,667,612 4,182,766 14.0% 4,019,494 -3.9% Fines and - forfeitures 1,195,054 1,109,710 950,000 -14.4% 950,000 0.0% Operating revenue 39,033,106 39,750,384 41,761,604 5.1% 42,823,745 2.5% Investment income 455,163 (174,238) 447,531 - 356.9% 463,956 3.7% Other revenue 4,905,768 1,661,579 568,277 -65.8% 1,1 88,448 109.1% Debt issued 5,174,868 8,480,026 2,917,200 -65.6% 4,599,895 57.7% Other financing sources 94,975 62,428 - - 100.0% 30,245,255 NA TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER 6.4% 32,759,604 1.8% Contractual services 13,987,902 FINANCING SOURCES $ 95,158,905 $ 99,356,737 $ 95,331,875 -4.1% $ 98,835,450 3.7% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 19,965,670 $ 18,058,543 $ 20,380,412 12.9% $ 17,960,549 -11.9% Communications & tech. 1,041,718 1,182,968 1,210,257 2.3% 1,506,574 24.5% Human.resources 445,893 905,157 827,487 -8.6% 695,637 -15.9% Finance 717,345 782,101 1,187,619 51.8% 1,191,299 0.3% Public works 20,110,754 21,351,477 22,567,897 5.7% 22,913,578 1.5% Engineering 7,846,862 6,498,786 9,330,550 43.6% 13,926,591 49.3% Police 10,298,379 10,514,059 11,693,713 11.2% 11,764,823 0.6% Fire 6,264,920 6,685,619 7,1 19,458 65% 7,134,947 0.2% Parks & recreation 10,837,727 12,494,013 12,134,136 -2.9% 13,244,427 9.2% Community development 1,368,336 1,637,815 1,700,031 3.8% 1,742,160 2.5% Debt service 8,912,394 16,801,634 6,008,988 -64.2% 6,654,894 10.7% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 87,809,998 $ 96,912,172 $ 94,160,548 -2.8% $ 98,735,479 4.9% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ 10,1 19,193 $ 10,480,175 $ 10,635,139 1.5% $ 10,696,828 0.6% Personal services 28,346,413 30,245,255 32,187,018 6.4% 32,759,604 1.8% Contractual services 13,987,902 14,641,036 14,502,510 -0.9% 14,253,910 -1.7% Commodities 3,586,889 3,676,301 3,799,139 3.3% 3,853,162 1.4% Central services 4,374,753 4,822,787 5,040,600 4.5% 5,154,924 2.3% Equipment 1,308,222 1,043,676 2,138,140 104.9% 1,746,978 -18.3% Capital outlay 12,314,221 9,646,531 14,029,000 45.4% 17,395,224 24.0% Depreciation 3,958,490 4,522,688 4,937,850 9.2% 5,471,750 10.8% Debt service 9,813,915 17,833,723 6,891,152 -61.4% 7,403,099 7.4% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 87,809,998 $ 96,912,172 $ 94,160,548 -2.8% $ 98,735,479 4.9% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION $ 7,348,907 $ 2,444,565 $ 1,171,327 $ 99,971 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA 2015 Budget by Fund Type 2014 Budget 2015 Budget 12/10/2014 Governmental Enterprise Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $ 27,454,872 $ $ 27,454,872 $ 29,700,010 $ $ 29,700,010 Reductions (119,000) (119,000) (123,000) (123,000) Net tax revenue 27,335,872 27,335,872 29,577,010 29,577,010 Tax increments 3,900,000 3,900,000 100,000 100,000 Franchise fees 2,070,000 2,070,000 2,070,000 2,070,000 Special assessments 3,321,571 3,321,571 3,992,997 3,992,997 Licenses and permits 3,302,865 3,302,865 3,880,080 3,880,080 Intergovernmental 4,032,189 542,000 4,574,189 5,053,825 116,000 5,169,825 Charges for services 4,182,766 4,182,766 4,019,494 - 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 950,000 950,000 - 950,000 Operating revenue - 41,761,604 41,761,604 - 42,823,745 42,823,745 Investment income 327,400 120,131 447,531 327,400 136,556 463,956 Other revenue 513,921 54,356 568,277 1,128,921 59,527 1,188,448 Transfers 1,015,100 1,505,600 2,520,700 1,065,100 1,212,178 2,277,278 Debt issued 2,917,200 - 2,917,200 4,599,895 - 4,599,895 Other financing sources - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 53,868,884 $ 43,983,691 $ 97,852,575 $ 56,764,722 $ 44,348,006 $ 101,112,728 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration $ 8,1 16,558 $ 12,263,854 $ 20,380,412 $ 5,454,025 $ 12,506,524 $ 17,960,549 Communication & tech. 1,210,257 1,210,257 1,506,574 1,506,574 Human resources 827,487 827,487 695,637 695,637 Finance 909,509 278,110 1,187,619 904,918 286,381 1,191,299 Public works 9,492,615 13,075,282 22,567,897 9,563,518 13,350,060 22,913,578 Engineering 9,154,550 176,000 9,330,550 13,749,591 177,000 13,926,591 Police 11,264,011 429,702 11,693,713 11,323,415 441,408 11,764,823 Fire 7,1 19,458 - 7,1 19,458 7,134,947 - 7,134,947 Parks .& recreation 1,690,639 10,443,497 12,134,136 2,654,087 10,590,340 13,244,427 Community development 1,700,031 - 1,700,031 1,742,160 - 1,742,160 Debt service 6,008,988 - 6,008,988 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers 620,600 1,900,100 2,520,700 327,178 1,950,100 2,277,278 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES- $ 58,114,703 $ 38,566,545 $ 96,681,248 $ 61,710,944 $ 39,301,813 $ 101,012,757 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold $ - $ 10,635,139 $ 10,635,139 $ - $ 10,696,828 $ 10,696,828 Personal services 24,303,226 7,883,792 32,187,018 25,023,800 7,735,804 32,759,604 Contractual services 5,390,523 9,11 1,987 14,502,510 4,822,492 9,431,418 14,253,910 Commodities 1,844,514 1,954,625 3,799,139 1,880,062 1,973,100 3,853,162 Central services 3,779,712 1,260,888 5,040,600 3,860,316 1,294,608 5,154,924 Equipment 2,138,140 - 2,138,140 1,746,978 - 1,746,978 Capital outlay 14,029,000 - 14,029,000 17,395,224 - 17,395,224 Depreciation - 4,937,850 4,937,850 - 5,471,750 5,471,750 Debt service 6,008,988 882,164 6,891,152 6,654,894 748,205 7,403,099 Transfers 620,600 1,900,100 2,520,700 327,178 1,950,100 2,277,278 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 58,114,703 $ 38,566,545 $ 96,681,248 $ 61,710,944 $ 39,301,813 $ 101,012,757 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION $ (4,245,819) $ 5,417,146 $ 1,171,327 $ (4,946,222) $ 5,046,193 $ 99,971 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA 2015 Governmental Fund Budgets 12/10/2014 2015 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service ERiciency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property ax levy ' - $ 22,933,958 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 5,128,980 $ - $ 1,617,072 $ 29,700,010 Reductions (123,000) (123,000) Net tax revenue 22,810,958 20,000 5,128,980 1,617,072 29,577,010 Tax Increments - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 Franchise fees 770,000 - 1,200.000 - - - - - - 100,000 2,070,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - 2,083,699 - 1,909,298 3,992,997 Licenses and permits 3,830,080 - - - - - - - - 50,000 3,880,080 Intergovernmental 1,113,500 - - 100,000 115,325 - - - - 3,725,000 5,053,825 Charges for services 3,969,494 - - - - - - -- 50,000 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - - - - - - - - - 950,000 Investment Income 150,000 94,000 - - 300 200 20,000 - 62,900 327,400 Other revenue 461,100 - - - 57,821 7,000 23,000 - - 580,000 1,128,921 Transfers 765,100 - - - - - - - - 300,000. 1,065.100 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - 4,599,895 4,599,895 Other financing sources TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 34,820,232 $ 194.000 $ 1,200,000 $ 100,000 $ 173,446 $ 7,200 $ 43,000 $ 7,232,679 $ - $ 12,994,165 $ 56,764,722 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ 1,619,238 $ 3,809,787 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 5,454,025 Communication & tech. 1,040,674 - - - - - - - - 465,900 1,506,574 Human resources 695,637 - - - - - - . - - - - - 695,637 Finance 904,918 - - - - - - - - - 904,918 Public works 8.459,610 - - - - - - - 327.036 776,872 9,563,518 Engineering 1.735,095 - 1,551,303 - - - - - - 10,463,193 13,749,591 Police - 10,357,415 - - - 61,000 - - - - 905,000 11,323,415 Fire 7,007,398 - - - - - - 41,000 86,549 7,134,947 Parks &recreation 1,388,087 - - - - 240.000 22,907 - 150,915 852,178 2,654.087 " Community development 1,612,160 - - 100,000 - - - - - . 30,000 1,742,160 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers - - - - 327,178. 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES ' $ 34,820,232 $ 3,809,787 $ 1,551,303 $ 100,000 $ 61,000 S 240,000 $ 22,907 $ 6,654,894 $ 518,951 $ 13,931,870 $ 61,710,944 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $ 24,798,774 $ 118,467 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106.559 $ 25,023,800 Contractual services 4,469,594 6,120 23,000 100,001) 56.000 - 21,057 - - 146,721 4,822,492 Commodities 1,773,292 200 28,000 5,000 - 1,850 - - 71,720 1,880,062 Central services 3,778572 - 81,744 - - - - - - - 3,860,316 Equipment - - - - - 40,000 - - 180,606 1,526,372 1,746,978 Capital outlay - 3,685,000 1,418,559 - - 200,000 - - 338,345 11,753,320 17,395,224 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers 327,178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 34,820,232 $ 3,809,787 $ 1,551,303 $ 100,000 $ 61,000 $ 240,000 $ 22.907 $ $ 518,951 $ 13,931,870 $ 61,710,944 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ - $ (3,615,787) $ (351,303) $ - $ 112,446 $ (232,800) S 20,093 $ 577,785 $ (518,951) $ (937,705) $ (4,946,222) 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA 2015 Enterprise Fund Budgets EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT 2015 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS Administration $ - $ 12,506,524 $ Aquatic Golf $ Sports Art $ $ 12.506,524 Finance Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial 286,381 Public works Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 177,000 Operating revenues $ 19,433,473 $ 14,367,118 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,014,025 $ 2,017,519 $ 381,860 $ 445,950 $ 1,354,800 $ 786,000 $ 42,823,745 Intergovernmental 116,000 - - - - 2,423,956 554,090 - - 116,000 Investment income 96,556 100,000 1,850,100 - - - 15.000 25,000 136,556 Other revenue 56,527 - 3,000 - - 59,527 Transfers TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354.849 $ 14,356,624 :$ 485,000 230,000 2,423,956 $ 243,578 253,600 1,616,747 $ 1,212,178 TOTAL REVENUES AND OUT - BY TYPE TRANSFERS IN $ 19,702,556 $ 14.367,118 $ 1,023,000 $ 3,499,025 $ 2,247,519 $ 381,860 $ 692,528 $ 1,623,400 $ 811,000 $ 44,348,006 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration $ - $ 12,506,524 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 12.506,524 Finance 286,381 286,381 Public works 13,350,060 13,350.060 Engineering 177,000 177,000 Police 441,408 441,408 Parks and recreation - 938,625 3,3511756 2,423,956 554,090 683,306 1,616,747 1,014,860 10,590,340 Transfers . 100,000 1,850,100 - - - 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354.849 $ 14,356,624 :$ 938,625 $ 3,358,756 $ 2,423,956 $ 554,090 .$ 683,306 $ 1,616,747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,301,813 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ - $ 10,198,628 $ 46.000 $ 225,200 $ 85,000 $ $ 23,000 $ 105,000 $ 14,000 $ 10,696,828 Personal services 1,732,897 1,419,298 371,593 1,453.368 885,513 54,440 449,431 745,581 623.683 7,735,804 Contractual services 6,723,540 522.928 162,300 596,800 612,750 171,650 101,175 362,650 177,625 9,431.418. Commodities 999,500 63.150 89,650 380,800 96.950 3,000 48,300 183,450 108,300 1,973,100 Central services 708,588 227,520 27,108 132,588 58,836 35,400 53,316 51,252 1,294,608 Depreciation 3,487,500 75,000 236,500 570,000 545.000 325,000 26,000 166,750 40,000 5,471.750 Interest 602824 - 5,474 - 139,907 - - 748,205 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 - 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 14,354,849 $ 14,356,624 $ 938,625 $ 3,358,756 $ 2,423,956 $ 554.090 $ 683,306 $ 1,616;747 $ 1,014,860 $ 39,301,813 CHANGE IN NET POSITION $ 5,347,707 $ 10,494 $ 84,375 $ 140,269 $ (176,437) $ (172230) $ 9,222 $ 6,653 $ (203,860) $ 5,046.193 12/10/2014 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Date: December 16, 2014 Subject: Consider Approval of 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan Agenda Item #: VIII. B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Adopt 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan. Information / Background: The City started the 2015 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process early in 2014. The process was designed to get input on priorities and funding from different stakeholders including Council, residents and staff. Important dates for the 2015 Budget and CIP process were: • May 2014 public engagement effort on Speak Up, Edina! • May 28, 2014 Executive Leadership Team (ELT) staff meeting was the official kickoff for staff level work on the process. • August 19, 2014 work session, Council and staff discussed the budget and CIP process and targets. • On September 16, 2014, Council adopted a preliminary tax levy. • October - November 2014 the City solicits resident feedback through Speak Up, Edina! and a paper survey. • November 18, 2014 work session, Council and staff review the staff recommended CIP. • December 2, 2014, Council held a public hearing on the proposed 2015 Budget and levy. A full version of the proposed CIP was distributed to Council members in early October. The proposed CIP has also been available on the City's website since October. If approved by Council, the final version of the CIP will include all the same projects and funding sources as the proposed version, with a few grammatical corrections and improvements. Attachment: - 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan Summary City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ,REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION. Page 2 . City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Plan 2015 "thru 2019 PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Administration & HRA Liquor - New POS System All Stores 15 -208 1 80,000 Election Equipment Replacement 15 -226 1 Liquor Fund 13,750 17,250 13,750 44,750 Equipment Replacement Program Liquor - 50th Conveyor System 15 -210 3 13,750 17,250 13,750 44,750 HRA - France Ave & TH 62 Interchange 15 -218 2 100,000 500,000 Liquor - Vernon Rooftop HVAC Replacement 15 -216 600,000 Tax Increment Funds 25,000 100,000 500,000 25,000 600,000 HRA - Grandview Development Studies 15 -220 2 50,000 4 80,000 50,000 Tax Increment funds 50,000 80,000 80,000 Liquor - Vemon Doors Replacement 50,000 HRA - GrandviewLandAcquisition 15 -221 2 2,000,000 1,000,000 Liquor Fund 3000,000 Tax Increment funds 30,000 2,000,000 1,000, 000 135,000 80,000 3,000,000 HRA - Grandview 2 Tax Increment Plan 15 -222 2 50,000 25,000 75,000 Tax Increment Funds Page 13 50,000 25,000 Monday, September 22, 2014 75,000 HRA - 50th & France Small Area Plan 15 -223 2 75,000 75,000 Tax Increment funds 75,000 75,000 HRA - North Parking Ramp Expansion 15 -224 2 200,000 6,000,000 6,200,000 Sales Leese Revenue 2,000,000 7,0001000 Tax Increment Funds 200,000 4,000,000 4,200,000 HRA - Promenade Phase V 15 -225 2 1,500,000 1,500,000 Tax Increment Funds 1,5010,000 1,500,000 Electronic Document Management 15 -211 4 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Construction Fund - AvailableFunding 25,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 Construction Fund - Not Determined 25,000 25,000 50,0100 Agenda Management Software 15 -212 5 25,000 25,000 Construction Fund - Unfunded 25,000 15,WO Administration & HRA Total 2,150,000 1,425,000 6,538,750 42,250 1,538,750 11,694,750 Administration: Liquor Stores Liquor - New POS System All Stores 15 -208 1 80,000 80,000 Liquor Fund 80,000 80,000 Liquor - 50th Conveyor System 15 -210 3 35,000 35,000 Liquor Fund 35,000 35,000 Liquor - Vernon Rooftop HVAC Replacement 15 -216 3 25,000 25,000 Liquor fund 25,000 25,000 Liquor - Security Camera Upgrade All Stores 15 -213 4 80,000 80,000 Liquor fund 80,000 80,000 Liquor - Vemon Doors Replacement 15 -214 5 30,000 30,000 Liquor Fund 30,000 30,000 Administration: Liquor Stores Total 135,000 80,000 35,000 150,000 Communications Page 13 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# . Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total CTS Equipment Replacement 15 -182 1 151,900 279,629 52,000 265,500 448,000 1,197,029 Equipment Replacement Program 1 30,000 15,000 45,000 151,900 279,629 5Z 000 165,500 448,000 1,197,029 Council Chambers Upgrade 15 -188 1 150;000 80,000 200,000 100,000 15,000 395,000 Special Assessments - 140,000 150,000 Equipment Replacement Program 20,000 10,000 150,000 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 220,000 150,000 Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling 15 -184 3 100,000 100,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 395,000 Construction Fund. AvailableFunding 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,009 65,000 265,000 Construction Fund - Not Determined 65,000 65,000 130,000 Server Room Fire Suppression 15 -186 3 36,000 36,000 Construction Fund. Available Funding 36,000 36,000 Public Works Server Room Fire Suppression 15 -187 3 28,000 28,000 Construction Fund- Available Funding 18,000 28,000 GIS Infrastructure 15 -183 4 394,500 247,700 200,200 150,200 992,600 Construction Fund - Not Determined 100,200 150,200 350,400 Construction fund - Potential GF Reserve 194,500 247,700 M2,200 Construction fund - Unfunded 200,000 100,000 City of Edina Wireless Network 15 -185 4 75,000 75,000 75,000 225,000 Construction fund - Not Determined 75,000 75000 Construction fund - Potential GFReserve 75,000 75,000 150,000 Gateway Signs 15 -189 6 285,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 7,035,000 Construction fund - Not Determined 150,008, 150,000 Construction Fund - Unfunded 35,000 150,000 150,000 335,000 Park Dedication 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 Tax Increment funds 250,000 250,000 Communications Total 750,900 1,099,129 689,700 855,700 663,200 4,058,629 Community Development Comprehensive Plan 15 -002 1 200,000 100,000 300,000 Construction fund - Available funding 1,115,000 200,000 200,000 Construction Fund - Not Determined 142,000 imam 100,000 Assessing Division Equipment Replacement 15 -003. 1 30,000 15,000 45,000 Equipment Replacement Program 30,000 15,000 45,000 70th & Cahill Small Area Plan 15 -004 2 50,000 50,000 Tax Increment Funds 50,000 50,000 Community Development Total 80,000 200,000 100,000 15,000 395,000 Engineerin 54th Street Reconstruction 15 -123 1 2,530,000 1,530,000 Municipal State Aid 1,115,000 2,115,W0 Special Assessments 142,000 142,000 Utility fund - Storm On Rate Slydy) 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 85,000 85,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 168,000 168,000 Valley View Road Reconstruction 15 -124 1 1,320,000 1,320,000 Municipal State Aid 880,000 880,000 Special Assessments - 140,000 140,0100 Utility fund - Sewer On Rate Study) 20,000 10,000 Utility Fund - Storm On Rate Study) 20,000 20,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 220,000 220,000 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 40,000 40,000 Tracy Avenue Reconstruction 15 -125 1 2,270,000 2,270,000 Municipal State Aid 1,500,000 1,500,000 Special Assessments 100,000 200,000 Page 14 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Utility Fund - Sewer an Rate Study) 145,000 145,000 Utility fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 55,000 55,000 Utility Fund - Storm pn Rate Study) 90,000 90,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 30,000 30,000 Utility fund - Water pn Rate Study) 220,000 220,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 30,000 30,000 Parklawn Avenue Reconstruction 15 -126 1 1,470,000 1,470,000 Municipal State Aid .: 740,000 740,000 Special Assessments 160,000 160,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate Study) 15,000 25,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 175,000 175,000 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 120,000 120,000 Utility Fund. Water (In Rate Study) 10,000 10,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 240,000 240,000 W 62nd Street Reconstruction 15 -128, 1 2,450,000 2,450,000 Municipal State Aid 1,534,000 1,534,000 Special Assessments 346,000 34600 Utility fund -Sewer (Undetermineo7 200,000 200, OW Utility fund - Storm (Undetermined) 120,000 120,000 Utility fund - Water (Undetermined) 250,000 250,000 Birchcrest B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -129 1 2,697,342 2,697,342 PA CS Fund 101,597 101,597 Special Assessments 1,299,529 1,199,529 Utility fund - Sewer an Rate Study) 113,388 113,388 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 113,219 113,219 Utility fund - Storm fin Rate Study) 605,648 605,648 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 362,364 361,364 Utility fund - Water (In Rate Study) 91,654 91,654 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 9,943 9,943 Arden Park D Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -130 1 7,033,850 7,033,850 PA CS Fund 507,202 507,202 Special Assessments 2,092,870 2092,870 Utility fund - Sewer pn Rate Study) 625,584 625,584 Utility fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 624,656 624,656 Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate Study) 1,003,157 1,003,157 -Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 600,198 600,198 Utility Fund - Water pn Rate Study) 1,425,529 1425,529 Utility Fund -Water (Outside Rate Study) 154,654 154,654 Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood St Reconstruction 15 -131 1 674,890 674;890 Special Assessments 334,415 334,425 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate Study) 16,118 .4118 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 16,079 26,079 Utility fund - Storm pn Rate Study) 134,814 134,814 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 80,661 80,661 Utility Fund - Water (In Rate Study) 65,669 65669 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 7,114 7,114 Countryside H Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -132 1 3,898,579 3,898,579 PA CS Fund 235,760 235,760 Special Assessments 1,815,018 1,815,018 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate Study) 141,750 141,750 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 141,540 141,540 Utility Fund - Storm On Rate Study) 731,674 731,674 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 437,767 437,767 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 356,404 356,404 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 38,666 38,666 Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -133 1 624,289 624,289 Special Assessments 309,351 309,351 Utility Fund - Sewer On Rate Study) 14,160 24,160 Page 15 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority, 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 -Total: Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 24,124, 24,124 Utility fund - Storm On Rate Study) 124,706 124,706 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) . 74,613 74,613 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 60,745 60,745 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 6,590 6,590 Strachauer Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruct 15 -134 1 3,605,403 3,605,403 PA CS Fund . 40,612 40,611 SpecialAssessments 1,726,801 1,726,801 Utility fund - Sewer On Rate Study) 137,191 137,292 Utility fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 132,229 132,229 Utility fund - Storm On Rate Study) 946,519 946,519 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 246,082 246,082 Utility fund - Water(ln Rate Study) 333,944 333,944 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 41,924 41,924 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -135 1 5,670,719 5,670,719 PA CS Fund 302,202 301,202 Special Assessments 2,032,988 1,031,988 Utility Fund =Sewer On Rate Study) 371,231 371,231 'Utility fvnd = Serer (dutside Rate Study) 357,543 357,543 Utility Fund - Storm (M Rate Study) 850,632 650,632 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 221,153 221,153 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 1,363,760 11363,760 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 171,210 171,210 Momingside A/Mite Oak C Neighborhood St Recon 15 -136 1 2,626,193 2,626,193 PA CS Fund 51,734 51,734 Special Assessments 846,739 846,739 Utility Fund - Sewer On Rate Study) 191,477 191,477 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 184,416 184,416 Utility Fund - Storm On Rate Study) 802,849 802,849 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 208,730 208,730 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 301,297 302,297 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 37,951 .37, 951 Normandale Park D Neighborhood Street Reconstruct 15 -137 1 3,586,713 3,586,713 Special Assessments 1,320,373 1,320,373 Utility fund - Sewer (In Rate Study) 473,320 473,320 Utility fund - Storm On Rate Study) 741,156 742,256 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 53,841 53,841 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 996,923 996,923 Birchcrest A/Countryside B Neighborhood St Recon 15 -138 1 4,660,288 4,660,288 PA CS Fund 36x533 366,533 Special Assessments. 2,078,110 Z, 078, 110 Utility Fund - Sewer On Rate Study) 324,354 314,354 Utility Fund - Storm On Rate Study) 1,341,637 1,341,637 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 97,318 97,318 Utility fund - Water (ln Rate Study) 452336 452,336 Parkwood Knolls B Neighborhood Street Reconstruct 15 -139 1 1,874,590 1,874590 PA CS Fund 140,828 140,828 Special Assessments 859,122 859,112 Utility Fund - Sewer On Rate Study) 134,093 134,093 Utility Fund Storm On Rate Study) 516,107 516,107 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 37,437 37,437 i Utility fund - Water (In Rate Study) 187,003 187,003 Chowen Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -140 1 2,423,369 Z, 423,369 PACS Fund '. 218,285 218,285 Special Assessments 1,092,,674 1,092,674 Utility Fund - Sewer (Undetermined) 170,546 170,546 Utility fund - Storm (Undetemuneo 704,025 704,015 Utility fund - Water (Undetertnineo . 237,839 237,839 Page 16 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project#, Priority . 2015 2016 2017 .2018 2019 ., Total Chowen Park B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -141 1 2,303,790 2,303,790 PACS Fund. 158,068 158,068 Special Assessments 651,973 651,973 Utility fund - Sewer (Undetermined) 101,761 101,761 Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) 1,150,075 1,250,075 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 141,913 141,913 Dewey Hill B -E Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -142 1 4,386,347 4,386,347 Special Assessments 1,758,815 1,758,815 Utility fund - Sewer (Undetermined) 546,573 546,573 Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) 975,801 975,801 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 1,105,158 1,105,158 Concord D /Pamela Park B -E Neighborhood St Recon 15 -143 1 2,825,005 2,825,005 Special Assessments 1,069,793 11069,793 Utility fund - Sewer (Undetermined 383,493 383,493 Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) 563,992. 563,992 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 807,727 807,717 Indian Hills C /Creek Valley B Neighborhood St Rec 15 -144 1 367,447. 367,447 Special Assessments 181,079 182079 Utility Fund - Sewer (Undetermined) 18,419 28,419 Utility Fund - Storm ( Undetermined) 117,316 117,316 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 39,633 39,633 Countryside I Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15 -145 1 1,402,197 1,402,197 Special Assessments 694,824 694,824 Utility Fund - Sewer(UndetermineiO 108,449 108,449 Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) 447,684 447,684 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 151,140 151,240 Prospect Knolls A Neighborhood Street Reconstruct 15 -146 1 2,933,396 2,933,396 SpecialA_ssessments 1,453,571 1, 453,571 Utilityfund- Sewer (Undeteimined) 216,875 226,875 Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) 936,555 936,555 Utility fund - Water (Undetermined) 316,395 316,395 Valley View, Tracy Ave, Valley Ln Roundabout 15 -151 1 895,000 895,000 Municipal State Aid 700,000 700000 PACS Fund 50,000 50,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 25,000 25,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 80,000 80,000 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 40,000 40,600 Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk 15 -152 1 166,000 166,000 PACS Fund 166,000 166,000 Vernon Road Sidewalk 15 -153 1 246,000 246,000 PACS Fund 246,000 146,000 Oaklawn Avenue Sidewalk 15 -154 1 210,000 210,000 PACS Fund 210,000 210,000 Xerxes Avenue South Sidewalk 15 -155 1 240,000 240,000 480,000 PACS Fund 240,000 240,000 480,000 • 64th Street Sidewalk 15 -156 1 37,000 37,000 PACS Fund 37,000 37000 • 65th Street Sidewalk 15 -157 1 53,000 53,000 PACS Fund 53,000 53,000 Engineering Equipment Replacement 15 -181 1 25,000 25,000 28,000 75,000 27,000 180,000 Equipment Replacement Program 15,000 15,0100 18,000 75,000 27,000 180,000 Seal Coating - Deferred Maintenance 15 -121 2 .701,067 658,533 704,000 2,063,600 Construction Fund- Unfunded 701,067 658,533 704,000 Z, 063,600 Mill and Overlay - Deferred Maintenance 15 -122 2 400,000 400,000 400,000 800,000 800,000 2,8001000 Page 17 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Construction Fund - Unfunded 400,0100 400,000 400,000 800,000 .800,000 1,800,000 W 58th Street Reconstruction 15 -127 2 150,000 150,000 Municipal State Aid 150,000 150,000 Momingside Watermain Lining 15 -161 2 450,000 275,000 725,000 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 200,000 100,000 300,0100 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Studo 150,000 175,000 425,000 Greater,Southdale Traffic Model 15 -167 2 125,000 125,000 Tax Increment funds 125,000 125,000 Grandview Transportation Study 15 -168 2 250,000 250,000 Tax Increment Funds 250,000 250,000 Promenade Phase 4 15 -172 2 2,070,000 2,070,000 Grants & Donations - Watershed District 480,000 480,0010 Park Dedication 584000 580,000 Taxlncrement funds 460,000 460,000 Utility fund =Storm (Outside Rate Study) 550,000 550,000 Pentagon Park - W 77th Street 15 -176 2 150,000 2,735,000 2,885,000 Tax' Increment Funds 150,000 2,735,000 1,885,000 Pentagon Park, 77th Street Bridge 15 -177 2 150,000 2,415,000 2,565,000 Tax Increment Funds 150,000 2,415,000 2565,000 Pentagon Park -Viking Drive and Computer Avenue 15 -178 2 150,000 1,525,000 1,675,000 Tax Increment funds 150,000 1,515,000 1,675,000 Pentagon Park - 76th Street 15 -179 2 150,000 7,675,000 7,825,000 Tax Increment Funds 150,000 7,674000 7,825,000 Pentagon Park - Green Streets 15 -180 2 150,000 4,170,000 4,320,000 Tax Increment Funds 150,000 4,170,000 4,3211,000 Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation 15 -148 3 1,000,000 1,000,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 11000,000 11000,000 72nd North Branch Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 15 -149 3 1,300,000 1,300,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Undetermined) 1,300, 000 1,300,000 Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Lining (Area 3 & 5) 15 -150 3 1,100,000 1,100,000 Utility fund -Sewer (Undetermined) 1,100,000 11100,000 Asset Management Software and Equipment 15 -173 3 60,000 60,000 120,000 Utility fund - Sewer an Rate Study) 20,000 20,000 40,0100 Utility Fund - Storm On Rate Study) 20,000 21,000 40,000 Utility Fund - Water On Rate Study) 20,000 20,000 40,000 Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion 15 -147 4 120,000 250,000 1,600,000 1;970,000 Utility fund- Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 120,000 250,000 1,600,000 1,970,000 RRFB Pedestrian Crossings 15 -159 5 10,000 10,000 20,000 PA CS Fund 10,000 10,000 20,000 Valley View Road/Valley Lane Bridge 15 -165 5 150,000 150,000 Municipal State Aid 15b,000 150,000 Cooper Circle Pond Outlet 15 -166 5 250,000 250,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 250,000 250,000 54th Street (Gravel Road West of Xerxes Avenue) 15 -174 5 220,000 220,000 Special Assessments 170,000 170,000 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 50,000 50,000 On -Street Bike Facility Pavement Markings 15 -158 6 50,000 40,000 30,000. 30,000 30,000 180,000 PACS Fund - 50,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 New Water Treatment Plant 5 15 -162 6 500,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 8,000,000 Utility fund - Water (In Rate Study) 3,500,000 3,5010,000 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 500,000 500,000 Page 18 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Utility Fund - Water ( Undetermined) 4,000,000 4,000,000 New Storage at WTP 5 15 -163 6 1,000,000 1,000,000 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 11000,000 1,00 ,000 Well 21 and Raw Water Line 15 -164 6 . 75,000 600,000 675,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 75,000 75,000 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 600,000 600,000 Flood Protection & Clean Water Improvements 15 -169 6 250,000 250,000 Utility Fund - Storm pn Rate Study) 150,000 150,000 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan 15 -170 6 200,000 200,000 Utility fund - Storm On Rate Study) 45,000 45,060 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 155,009 455,000 Flood Protection & Clean Water Improvements 15 -171 6 275,000 275,000 550,000 Utility fund - Storm pn Rate Study) 275,000 275,000 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 175,000 275,000 Miscellaneous Pedestrian /Bicycle Projects 15 -160 7 49,000 113,000 267,000 638,000 1,015,000 2,082,000 PA CS Fund 49,090 113,000 167,000 638,000 1,015,000 1,082,000 Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road Roundabout 15 -175 7 350,000 350,000 Municipal State Aid 250,000 150,000 Utility fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 20,000 21,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 40,000 40,000 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 40,000 40,000 Engineering Total 24,879,017 27,925,848 17,315,591 27,031,506 15,620,045 112,772,007 Finance Accounts Payable Software 15 -001 4 50,000 50,000 Construction fund - Available Funding 50,000 50, 000 Finance Total 50,000 50,000 Fire Thermal Imaging Cameras 15 -192 1 18,000 18,000 -Equipment Replacement Program 18,090 18,090 Inspections Division Vehide Replacement 15 -194 1 40,000 40,000 Equipment Replacement Program 40,000 40,000 Ambulance Replacement 15 -196 1 200,000 200,000 Equipment Replacement Program 100,000 200,000 Life Pack 12 Cardiac Monitors/Defibrillators 15 -197 1 160,000 160,000 Equipment Replacement Program 160,000 160,000 Utility Pickup Truck Replacement 15 -198 1 35,000 35,000 Equipment Replacement Program 35,000 35,000 Inspections Division Vehicle Replacement 15 -200 1 60,000 60,000 Equipment Replacement Program 60,000 60,000 Fire Department Staff Vehides Replacement 15 -201 1 70,000 70,000 Equipment Replacement Program 70,000 70,000 Fire Engine Replacement 15 -203 1 550,000 550,000 Equipment Replacement Program 550,000 550,000 Siren #9 Replacement 15 -204 1 19,000 19,000 Equipment Replacement Program 19,000 19,000 Inspections Division Vehicle Replacement 15 -205 1 21,000 21,000 Equipment Replacement Program 21,000 11,000 Page 19 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Ambulance Replacement 15 -206 1 220,006 220,000 Equipment Replacement Program 110,000 220,000 Fire Department Staff Vehicles Replacement 15 -207 1 70,000 70,000 Equipment Replacement Program 70,000 70,000 Hydraulic Rescue Tools Replacement 15 -227 1 57,000 57, -000 Equipment Replacement Program 57,000 57, 000 Mechanical Insulation 15 -190 2 41,000 41,000 Environmental Efficiency Fund 41,000 ' 41,000 KNOX Box 15 -191 2 25,000 .25,000 Construction fund - Available funding 25,000 25, 000 SMPSTF - Classroom Expansion 15 -195 4 300,000 300,000 Construction Fund - Potential GF Reserve 300,000 300,000 Mobile Command Vehide 15 -199 7 325,000 325,000 Construction fund - Unfunded 325,000 315,000 Fire Total 124,000 695,000 512,000 810,000 70,000 1,211;000 Park & Recreation Park Shelter Buildings Roof Replacement 15 -052 2 60,000 60,000 Construction Fund - Available funding 60,000 60,000 Rosland Park Playground Equipment 15 -023 3 200,000 200,000 Construction Fund - Available funding 200000 200,000 Todd Park Hockey Boards 15 -026 3 65,000 65,000 Construction fund - Available Funding 65,000 65,000 Bredesen Park Comfort Station Renovation 15 -039 3 80,000 80,000 Construction Fund - Available funding 80,000 80,000 Park Shelter Buildings Siding Replacement 15 -053 3 120,000 120,000 Construction Fund - Available funding 120,000 120,0100 Weber Park Playground Equipment 15 -031 4 175,000 175,000 Construction Fund - Potential GF Reserve 175,000 175,000 Wooddale Park Playground Equipment 15 -032 4 175,000 175,000 Construction fund - Potential GF Reserve 175,000 175,000 Arden Park Shelter Building Replacement 15 -047 4 650,000 650,000 Construction fund - Potential2017 Tax Levy 650,000 65000 Normandale Park Shelter Building Replacement 15 -048 4 650,000 650,000 Construction fund - Not Determined 650,000 650,000 Lewis Park Shelter Building Replacement 15 -049 4 650,000 650,000 Construction Fund - Not Determined 650,000 650,000 Highlands Park Shelter Building Replacement 15 -050 4 650,000 650,000 Construction Fund - Not Determined 650,000 650,000 Strachauer Park Shelter Building Replacement 15 -051 4 650,000 650,000 Constriction fund - Not Determined 650,000, 650,000 Walnut Ridge Park Irrigation System 15 -074 4 40,000 40,000 Construction fund - Potential GF Reserve 40,000 40,000 Garden Park Irrigation System 15 -075 4 40,000 40,000 Construction fund -Potential GF Reserve 40,000 ._ 40, 000 Van Valkenburg Park,lrrigation System 15 -076 4 30,000 30,000 Construction Fund - Potential GF Reserve 30,000 30,000 Braemar. Park Courtney Field Fencing 15 -078 6 215,000 215,000 Construction Fund - Unfunded 215,000 215,000 Page 20 Monday, September 22, 2014 l Department Project# Priority 20151. 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Van Valkenburg Park Softball Field Fencing 15 -079 6 27,000 120,000 15 -077 120,000 Construction fund - Unfunded Arena - Low E Ceiling Replacement 15 -04C Arena fund 120,000 Arena - Dehumidifier Replacement 120,000 New Showmobile 15 -087 7 15 -072 Environmental Efficiency Fund 125,000 125,000 Construction fund - Not Determined Construction Fund - Unfunded 55,000 Arena - Bathroom /Locker Room Remodel 15 -082 125,000 125,000 Park & Recreation Total 15 -084 Construction Fund - Unfunded 525,000 375,000 1,070,000 1,425,000 1,300,000 4,695,000 85,000 Parks: Arena Total 85,000 85,0100 5 225,000 Parks: Aquatic Center Aquatic Center - Main Pool Filter 15 -043 1 189,000 224000 6 789,000 Aquatic Center Fund 100,000 189,000 100,000 18900 Aquatic Center - Plunge Pool Filter 15 -044 1 35,000 120,000 120,000 Aquatic Center Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,0100 Aquatic Center - Zero Depth Pool Filter 15 -045 1 135,000 135,000 Aquatic Center Fund 135,000 135,000 Aquatic Center - Large Slide Replacement 15 -065 5 525,000 525,000 Aquatic Center fund 515,000 525,000 i Aquatic Center - Toddler Play Structure 15 -068 5 341,250 341,250 Aquatic Center Fund 341,150 341,150 Parks: Aquatic Center Total 189,000 476,250 645,000 1,310,250 Parks: Arena Arena - Water System Repairs 15 -041 Arena Fund 27,000 Arena - Fire Alarm Monitoring Replacement 15 -077 Construction fund - Available Funding 27,000 Arena - Low E Ceiling Replacement 15 -04C Arena fund 30,000 Arena - Dehumidifier Replacement 15 -073 Construction Fund - Not Determined 30,000 Arena - Condensing Unit Replacement 15 -072 Environmental Efficiency Fund 55,000 Arena - Lobby Roof Repair 15 -086 Construction Fund - Unfunded 55,000 Arena - Bathroom /Locker Room Remodel 15 -082 Construction fund - Unfunded 165,000 Arena - Rubber Floor Replacement 15 -084 Construction Fund - Unfunded 165,000 Arena - Lower Level Parking Lot 15 -083 Construction Fund - Not Determined 85,000 Parks: Arena Total Parks: Art Center Art Center - East Side Parking Lot Repair 15 -035 Construction fund - Available funding Art Center - East Side Kiln Yard Repair 15 -070 Construction Fund - Available Funding Art Center - HVAC,Replacement 15 -085 Environmental Efficiency fund 1 27,000 27,590 21,590 27,000 27,000 21,988 21,988 27,000 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 3 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 3 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 4 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,0100 5 225,000 225,000 225,0010 224000 6 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 6 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 7 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 112,000 225,000 135,000 205,000 165,000 842,000 2 21,590 27,590 21,590 11,590 2 21,988 21,988 21,988 21,988 3 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Page 21 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total. Parks: Art Center Total 73,578 73,578 Parks: Centennial. Lakes Park Centennial Lakes - Pedestrian Bridge Repairs 15 -022 1 65,000 65,000 Park Dedication 65,000 65,000 Centennial Lakes - Walkway Lighting Retrofit 15 -025 3 88,000 88,000 Centennial Cakes Fund 88,000 84000 Centennial Lakes - Putting Course Ponds 15 -038 3 35,000 35,000 Constroctlon fund - Available funding 35,000 35,000 Centennial Lakes - Floating Bridge. Replacement 15 -081 5 50,000 50,000 Coas}nrction fund - Unfunded 50,000 50,000 Parks: Centennial Lakes Park Total 153,000 35,000 50,000 238,000 Parks: Edinborough Park Edinborough Park - Roof: Repairs- 15 -046 1 190,500 19 500 0 Construction Fund - Available Funding 190,500 190,500 Edinborough, Park - ,Adventure Peak Renovation 15 -027 2. 33,100 33,100 Construction fund - Available Funding 33,100 33,100 Edinborough Park - North Sidewalk 15 -028 2 32,300 32,300 Construction fund - Available Funding 32,300 32300 Edinborough Park - Exterior Entryway Doors 15 -055 2 93,215 93,275 Environmental Efficiency Fund, \ 93,215 93,215 Edinborough Park - Interior Entryway Doors 15 -056 3 71,295 71,295 Environmental Efficiency fund 71,295 71,295 Edinborough Park - Security Camera System 15 -030 4 73,865 73,865 Edinborough Fund 73,865 73,865 Edinborough Park - Boiler 15 -034 4 27,700 27,700 Environmental Efficiency fund 27,700 17,700 Edinborough Park - Upstairs Restroom Remodel 15 -071 4 30,800 30,800 Construction fund - Available Funding 30,800 30,800 Edinborough Park - Track Air Conditioning 15 -069 6 66,600 66,600 Construction fund - Unfunded 66,600 66,600 Parks: FAinborough Park Total 448,380 99,700 71,295 619,375 Parks: Golf Course Golf - Driving Range Expansion 15 -017 1 1,800,000 11800,000 Golf Course Fund 118001000 1,800,000 Golf - Greens Mowers Replacement 15 -061 1 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 145,000 GoliCourse, Fund 29,000 29,0100 29,000 29,0100 29,000 145,000 Golf - GnII Renovation 15 =018 2 175,000 175,000 Golf Course Fund 175,000 175,000 Golf - Driving RangelExec.Clubhouse Renovation 15 -019 2 50,000 50,000 Golf Course Fund 50,000 50,000 Golf - Clubhouse Banquet Renovation 15 -021 2 200,000 200,000 BiaemarMemonal Fund 20000 200,000 Golf - Clubhouse Banquet Tables and Chairs 15 -036 2 40,000 40,000 BraemarMemonal Fund 40,000 40,000 Page 22 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Golf - Clubhouse Security System 15 -042 2 60,000 3,441,000 208,000 98,000 93,000 60,000 Golf Course Fund 60,000 60,000 Golf - Tractor Replacement 15 -054 2 385,000 180,000 196,000 75,000 20,000 20,000 Golf Course fund 385,000 180,000 196,000 75,000 20,000 20,000 Golf - 72" Rough Mower Replacement 15 -058 2 457,000 580,810 66,410 66,410 24,000 24,000 Golf Course fund 50,160 24,000 24,000 Golf - Utility Vehicles Replacement 15 -059 2 457,000 530,650 66,410 20,000 20,000 40,000 Golf Course Fund 15 -008 1 41,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 Golf - Fairway Mowers Replacement 15 -060 2 41,000 49,000 49,000 95,000 98,000 Golf Course Fund 15 -009 1 49,000 49,000 27,000 98,000 Golf = Sprayer Vehicle Replacement 15 -062 2 50,000 27,000 50,000 Golf Course fund 15 -011 1 50,000 140,000 50,000 Golf - Heavy Duty Utility Vehicle Replacement 15 -063 2 20,000 140,000 20,000 Golf Course Fund 15 -013 1 20,000 39,000 20,000 Golf - Small Rough Mowers Replacement 15 -064 2 30,000 30,000 60,000 Golf Course Fund 30,000 30,000 60,000 Golf - Clubhouse & Driving Range Siding Repairs 15 -066 2 125,000 125,000 Golf Course fund 125,000 115,000 Golf - Large Rough Mower Replacement 15 -089 2 52,000 52,000 Golf Course Fund 52,000 5z 0100 Golf- Driving Range Ball Machines 15 -080 3 18,000 18,000 Golf Course Fund 18,000 18,000 Golf - Clubhouse Deck Resurface 15 -024 4 80,000 80,000 Golf Course fund 80,000 80,000 Golf - Signage 15 -033 4 47,500 47,500 Golf Course fund 47,500 47,500 Golf- Driving Range Clubhouse Patio Addition 15 -037 4 30,000 30,000 Golf Course fund 30,000 30,000 Golf - Shop & Office Renovation 15 -057 4 100,000 100,000 Golf Course Fund 100,000 100,000 Golf -Roof Replacement 15 -067 4 245,000 245,000 Golf Course fund 145,000 245,000 Golf - Course Renovation 15 -088 5 3,250,000 3250,000 Golf Course fund 3,250,000 3,150,000 Parks: Golf Course Total 2,889,500 3,441,000 208,000 98,000 93,000 6,719,500 Police Squad Cars 15 -005 1 385,000 180,000 196,000 75,000 212,000 1,048,000 Equipment Replacement Program 385,000 180,000 196,000 75,000 212,009 1,048,000 Public Safety Communications 15 -006 1 457,000 580,810 66,410 66,410 323,385 1,494,015 E911 50,160 50,160 Equipment Replacement Program 457,000 530,650 66,410 66,410 323,385 1,443,855 Communications Center Dispatch Furniture 15 -008 1 41,000 95,000 736,000 Equipment Replacement Program 41,000 95,000 136,000 Squad Rifles 15 -009 1 27,000 27,000 Equipment Replacement Program 27,000 27,000 Squad/Interview Room Video System 15 -011 1 140,000 140,000 Equipment Replacement Program 140,000 140,000 Squad Radar Units 15 -013 1 39,000 39,000 Page 23 Monday,, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Equipment Replacement Program 39,000 39000 Radar Speed Trailer 15 -014 1 10,000 10,000 Equipment Replacement Program 10,000 10,0100 SWAT Rifles 15 -012 3 22,000 22,000 Construction fund - Available funding 22000 220100 PD Garage Floor Repair 15 -015 4 22,000 22,000 Construction fund - Potential GF Reserve 12,000 2&000 Forensic Investigation Equipment 15 -010 5 48,599 48,599 Construction Fund - Not Determined 48,599 48,599 SWAT Vehicle 15 -016 6 80,000 80,000 Construction fund -Not Determined 80,000 80,000 Police Total 905,000 782,810 272,410 369,009 737,385 3,066,614 Public Works Sanitary Lift Station #3 Upgrade 15 -090 1 125,000 125,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 125,000 125,000 Sanitary Lift Station #14 Grinder Upgrade 15 -092 1 75,000 75,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 75,000 75,000 SCADARadio System Upgrade (Leg 2) 15 -094 1 49,000 49,000 Utility fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 16,000 16,000 Utility Fund. Storm #n Rate Study) 16,000 16,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 17,000 17,000 SCADA Radio System Upgrade (Leg 3) 15 -095 1 70,000 70,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside Rate Study) 23,000 23,000 Utility Fund - Storm 8n Rate Study) 13,000 24000 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 14,000 24,000 Well #10 Rehab 15 -098 1 120,000 120,000 Utility fund - Water On Rate Study) 110,000 120,000 Well #15 (Mirror Lakes Dr) 15 -099 1 120,000 120,000 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 120,000 110,000 Well #17 Rehab 15 -100 1 120,000 120,000 Utility fund - Water pn Rate Study) 110,000 120,000 Well #6 Rehab 15 -101 1 120,000 120,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 120,000 120,000 Well #5 (West 69th St) 15 -102 1 120,000 120,000 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 120,000 120,000 Well #18 Rehab 15 -103 1 120,000 120,000 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 120,000 120,000 Well #16 Rehab 15 -104 1 120,000 120,000 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 120,000 120,000 Public Works Equipment Replacement 15 -107 1 228,472 647,898 470,894 928,308 1,039,020 3,314,592 Equipment Replacement Program 128,472 647,898 470,894 928,308 1,039,020 3,314,592 Southdale Tower Rehab 15 -109 1 500,000 500,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 500,000 500,600 Utility Excavator 15 -112 1 180,000 180,000 Utility fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 120,000 120,000 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 60,000 60,000 Generator Load Bank Tester 15 -091 2 50,000 50,000 Construction fund - Available funding 10,800 10,860 Utility fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 39,100 39,200 Page 24 Monday, September 22, 2014 Department Project# Priority 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Generator RICE Compliance 15 -093 2 200,000 200,000 Construction Fund - Available funding 47600 42600 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Stud)] 157,400 157,400 Public Works Geothermal Repairs 15 -096 2 150,000 150,000 Environmental Efficiency fund 150,000 150,000 Utilities Equipment Replacement 15 -108 2 435,000 40,000 25,000 264,000 42,000 806,000 Utility fund - Sewer (In Rate Study) 410,000 20,000 15,0100 455,000 Utility Fund- Sewer (Undetermined 20,000 17,000 37,000 Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) 219,000 219,000 Utility fund - Water. (In Rate Study) 25,000 20,000 45,000 Utility fund- Water(Undeterinmed 25,000 25,000 50,000 Industrial Park Lighting 15 -113 2. 104,000 104,000 208,000 Environmental Efficiency Fund 104,000 104,000 208,000 Centralized Energy Analytics 15 -116 2 54,130 54,130 Environmental Efficiency Fund 54,130 54,130 Bridge Repairs 15 -097 3 170,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 570,000 Construction Fund - Available Funding 170,000 100,0010 100,000 370,000 Construction fund - Not Determined 100,000 1010,0010 200,000 Dublin Reservoir Pump Rehab 15 -105 3 - 30,000 45,000 75,000 Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) - 30,000 30,000 Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 45,000 45,000 Anti-icing and De-icing Equipment 15 -114 4 158,258 158,258 Construction fund - Potential GF Reserve 158,258 158,258 Spray Injection Pothole Patcher 15 -117 4 309,700 309,700 Construction fund - Potential GFReserve 309,700 309,700 Centralized HVAC Controls 15 -110 5 22,455 22,455 Environmental Efficiency Fund 18,906 18,906 South Metro Public Safety Training facility 3,549 3,549 Additional Skid Steer 15 -119 5 60,600 60,600 Construction Fund - Unfunded 60,600 60,600 Salt Storage Facility 15 -106 6 225,000 225,000 Construction Fund - Unfunded 225,000 225,000 Braemar Cold Storage Improvements 15 -120 6 50,000 50,000 Construction fund - Unfunded 50,00 50,000 City Hall Workout Area 15 -115 7 216,000 216,000 Construction fund - Unfunded 216,000 116,000 GPS Electrical System 15 -118 7 30,000 30,000 Construction Fund - Unfunded 30,000 30,000 Public Works Total 2,614,657 1,740,156 1,105,594 1,577,308 1,301,020 8,338,735 GRAND TOTAL 36,029,032 38,449,893 28,813,340 32,548,773 21,503,400 157,344,438 Page 25 Monday, September 22, 2014 myo .� 0 N,�v . �y 1888 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL 'Agenda Item #: VIII. C. From: Debra Mangen Action ®. City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ . Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -163 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt'Resolution. Information / Background: 5 In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -163 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St.' • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -163 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Art Center: Robin Abraham Watercolor Books & Instructional DVDs Sue Sheet Spring Scale Lee Strang Pottery Posters Donna Kurimay Camera Equipment & Art Books Edward Pacheoco $200.00 Carolyn Blake Illustration Boards, Carpet Samples, Paint & Mini Canvases Collette Cumella Print Donated To Gift Shop Michael & Pamela Welch Gift Card To Art Center Braemar Golf Course Memorial Fund: Braemar Mens Club $140.00 Dan Peterson $50.00 Terry Lewis $100.00 Dan Brunsvold $50.00 Les Sharpe $50.00 Leo Hopf $50.00 Doug Polich $50.00 John Canton $30.00 City of Edina: Mount Olivet Rolling Acres $300.00 Donation in lieu of taxes for city services Park Department: Vote Sprague $264.42 Public Art In Edina Jan Borene $25.00 Braemar Men's Club $25.00 Dated: December 16, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk O REPORT RECOMMENDATION v s To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item M. VIII.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendments For Building Height, Density And Floor Area Ratio; Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC, Resolution No. 2014 -150, & Resolution No. 2014 -151 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -150, approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -151, approving the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan. Information /Background: (Deadline February 3, 201 S) As requested by the City Council, staff has drafted resolutions for approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning. The conditions that were recommended by the City Council have been incorporated into the approving resolutions. In regard to requiring access off France and no access off 72 "d; staff met with Hennepin County Transportation staff. The staff reiterated that they would not support access to the site off France Avenue. They added that even if the applicant acquired the property to the south and a combined access were proposed, they would not support that alternative either; the County staff believed that plan would make France the traffic situation worse and less safe on France. The County staff recommended three alternatives. (See attached.) Alternative B is the most effective method to address concerns of the residents in the Cornelia area to the west. It proposes to cul -de -sac 72nd Street at the west end of the development. Residential traffic is directed to the north to Hazelton Road, and traffic for the project can only access France off 72nd Street. Direct access is also eliminated off France, which would improve safety on France and avoid pedestrian access conflicts with cars turning into the development. Project Background. The applicant, 7200 LLC is requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a four and five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including two restaurants and retail /office space. ➢ A two - level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail space would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72nd Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A13 -A56 in the Planning Commission Staff Report and in the attached development plan book.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are required: ➢ Building Height —from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 63 feet. ➢ Housing Density —from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio — from .5 to 1.49. In addition; the following land use applications are requested: 9 Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 9 Preliminary Development Plan. This "preliminary" review is the first step of a two -step process of City review. Should the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Rezoning be: approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Site Plan review which would again require review by both the Planning Commission and City Council. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD District would be included in the second step. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2014 -150 • Resolution No. 2014 -151 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-i50 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL•DISTRICT REGARDING HOUSING DENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHT AND FLOOR AREA RATIO Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 7200, France. LLC, is requesting to. redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear 'down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a-four and five - story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square feet of retail space including two restaurants and retail/ office space. ➢ A two - level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail space would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72nd Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. 1.02 To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are required within the OR, Office Residential District: Building Height - from 4 stories and 48 feet to 5 stories and 63 feet. ➢ Housing Density - from 30 units per acre to 50 units per acre. ➢ Floor Area Ratio - from .5 to 1.49. 1.03 On November 12, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays. 1.04 On December 2, 2014, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized staff. to prepare findings and conditions to approve the Comprehensive Plan. Vote: 4 Ayes, and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street a Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-150 Page 2 the Met Council of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. This project would include 32 new affordable housing units (20% of the projects units) toward that goal. 2. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck & Associates conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development.could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 3. Wenck and Associates found that .a residential development at the proposed density of 50 units an acre would generate fewer trips than would a City Code compliant medical office facility on a 3.5 acre property. Therefore, generally housing would have less impact on roads than would medical office. 4. The proposed uses are consistent with the. Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Office Residential OR," allows multiple family residential development with limited retail. 5. Podium height would be used on both France and from the residential area to west. Podium height is encouraged in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided OR, Office Residential which encourages mixing land uses, including limited retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 7. Access to a project with this type of density should occur off of France Avenue, or a local . street that serves high density residential, office, retail, or industrial uses. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 3.01 The following Comprehensive Plan Amendments are approved subject to Met Concil approval: A. Future Land Use Categories. The "Development Guidelines" in the table below are intended to highlight important design RESOLUTION NO. 2014-150 Page 3 considerations for each land use category, but are not regulatory in nature. Nonresidential` and- Mixed .use Categories Description, Land' Uses Development Guidelines.' Density Guidelines OR Transitional areas along Upgrade existing streetscape 12 -30 residential dwelling *J Office-Residential major thoroughfares or and building appearance, units /acre No current examples between higher - intensity improve pedestrian and Floor to Area Ratio -Per in City. Potential districts and residential transit environment. current Zoning Code: examples include districts. Many existing Encourage structured maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* Pentagon Park area highway- oriented parking and open space and other I-494 commercial areas are linkages where feasible; ** Residential density may, , corridor locations anticipated to transition to em hasize the enhancement P be increased to 50 units per this more mixed -use of the pedestrian p I r acre and 1.5 floor area ratio character. environment. I rJ with the provision of a Primary uses are offices, minimum of 20% of the attached or multifamily dwelling units being f r. housing. affordable housing as. Secondary uses:. Limited defined by the Metropol tai n Council s ..retail and service uses (not including "big. box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and maybe required on lar er sites: *•Floor -to -area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building's floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, an FAR of 1.0 could mean a two -story building covering 50% of the lot, a 3 -story building on one -third of ' the lot, etc. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-150 Page 4 l B. Figure 4.6B is amended as follows: E� lDiP- BVn@�mlya9e�R61E�P O -Omo �Y- q¢nl1�aMP�49 O M.-, , 1m�' �2 VIII( - 16�flaD®Ir Q P9P -NOffie _ - Q � -N�B3 O 6tL Ofsu®b11Q+64� Q 49411r�QAam1l�{Y , . . `EL- t�mm�O�CLI _ htidOi9 a 3-$ vwem \ - 4 4-S 2 (� f a 4 12 33 F I ORCa 4 1 2 o / m I 8 g 0 .a O 3 2 -►� a Hdnddlim 4 4 LL a 2 a 224 2 30mbs:3$ 0 4Sftees48 4 � 5�6Ir 895 2 2 s 9Sims108' e - 10 shMtM 12D J sm►ma 0 4 MR, a 12Slomim W a WK 2 LJ Rbdbm Hegld 4 &1DR aR MUMS, I 4 OR i g 2 2 ' m ma sa I OR �rnin q i6ri Future Lana Use Plan Q City of Ed-ma Bsaawns Heights 208 Comprehensive Plan Update Souffwast FAw"4M 02M SOME Uiia^ ® 9 03 857es * Height may be increased to five stories & 63 feet if podium height is utilized on France and adjacent to low density residential area subject to review and approval of the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-150 Page 5 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7200 LLC, AT 7200 FRANCE AVENUE Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 7200 France LLC, is requesting to redevelop the property at 7200 France. The proposal is to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a four and "five -story mixed use development project that would include the following: ➢ 160 unit luxury apartment, 32 units of which would be for affordable housing. ➢ 20,000 square -feet of retail space including two restaurants and retail/ office space. ➢ A two- level, 500 stall underground parking ramp. The retail space would be located on the France Avenue side of the project. Access to the retail .,space would be off France Avenue. Access to the residential use would be off 72nd Street. The existing vegetation and trees on the west side of the site would remain to provide screening from the residential area to the west. 1.02 To accommodate the request, following land use applications are requested: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from POD -1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. 1.03 On November 12, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended denial, of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays. 1.04 On December 2, 2014, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized staff to prepare findings and.condtions to approve the preliminary rezoning. Vote: 4 Ayes, and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD. Most importantly, the project would include 20% of its total units (32) for affordable housing, as- defined by the Metropolitan Council. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 82670390 RESOLUTION-NO. 2014-151 Page 2 2. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck & Associatesl conducted a traffic impact study, and` concluded that the proposed development could- be.supported by the existing roads subject-to conditions. 3. Wenck and Associates found that 'a residential development at the proposed density of 50 units an acre would generate fewer trips than would a City Code compliant medical office facility on a 3.5 acre, property. Therefore, generally housing would have less impact on roads than would medical office. 4. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Office Residential - OV allows multiple family residential development with limited retail. J 5. Podium height would be used on both France and from the residential area to west. Podium height is encouraged in the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided OR, Office Residential which encourages mixing land uses, including limited retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 7. Access to a project with this type of density should occur off of France Avenue, or a local street that serves high density residential, office, retail, or industrial uses. 8. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. 9. The project would include high efficiency mechanical equipment, appliances and electrical fixtures. Roof mounted photo_ voltaic panels for electrical energy generation are proposed. The applicant is pledging an energy savings 20% over current energy code requirements. 10. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 11. The city will work with the applicant to secure access off France Avenue for both the residential and retail portion of the project. 12. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ® Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian- Friendly Environment. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151 Page 3 c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and /or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustairialiility and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and-,long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be. placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down' at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories :`step back" from street. i. Provide affordable housing. j. Utilize podium height. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Curb cut access to the site (both residential and commercial) shall be off France Avenue. There may be a visitor access and parking off 72nd Street. 2. The building height limit shall be 63 feet. 3. The project must include indoor and outdoor bike amenities subject to review and approval at the time of final rezoning. 4. The retail uses for the site shall be determined at the time of approval of a PUD Ordinance. 5. Vegetation on the west side of the site shall remain as demonstrated on the preliminary plan. This area shall not be. used for stormwater or flood plain storage. 6. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated October 15 & 21, 2014. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151 Page 4 7. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated November 3, 2014. 11. The city will work with the applicant to secure access off France Avenue for both the residential and retail portion of the project.' 12. twenty percent (20 %) of the housing units (32) shall be designated for affordable housing as defined by the Metropolitan Council. 13. Sustainable design principles must be used. The project must include high efficiency mechanical equipment, appliances and electrical fixtures. Roof mounted photovoltaic panels for electrical energy generation are proposed. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 20% over state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 14. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-151 Page 5 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk Jackie Hpogenakker From: Sent: To: Subject: Sent from Windows Mail nealjblanchett @gmail.com Friday, December 05, 201411:22 AM Jackie Hoogenakker 7200 France` Proposal From:.,Mail Delivery Subsystem Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 3:16 PM To: nealiblanchett @gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: ihoo�enacker @edinamn.�ov Sorry, I tried to mail this prior to the last meeting but must have mis -typed your address. Please note my comments, below. Hello, We live in the Lake Edina neighborhood, and from my perspective, we would like to see more development and density on France Avenue near us. I feel that France Avenue is so busy and traffic - choked already, it truly illustrates the truism that cities cannot build themselves out of congestion. Part of the solution should be greater density, putting residents near jobs and amenities so that they do not need to drive to them. In particular] do not see the sense of keeping dense development on one side of France Avenue. The huge traffic burden already impacts both sides of the street. It would make more sense to have it be a dense corridor, linking nodes of especially high activity, allowing people.to park their cars in one place and.do many things in close proximity. France Avenue at rush hour is the most hostile place in Edina because of the cars speeding through in huge volumes. More density would add some cars, .but it would also take some cars away, and it would allow the businesses near there to continue to thrive without adding the traffic that would be added by separating uses as we did in the decades past. haven't studied the 7200 proposal enough to be for or against it, but I would not object to it on the basis of density. It may have other flaws, but that area is already so traffic - choked, we need to route traffic TO, not THROUGH that area. Jackie Hooaenakker 'rom: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 8:50 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Ave. Please forward to: Cary Teague Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council You will have multiple opportunities to build PUDs - multi - family, affordable housing, retail, restaurants, office space, etc. - on the parcels along the west side of France Avenue south of 7200. Those parcels do not abut a single- family,-neighborhood. 7200 does and it should not be 50% higher and three times denser than what is currently allowed. Sincerely, 3arbara L. Turner '7315 Glouchester Dr. 1 Jackie Hoo- enakker From: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @.gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 8:31 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 FRANCE Please forward to Cary Teague, the Mayor and all members of the City Council. After attending the ,City Council meeting on December 2, 2014, 1 have the following suggestions: Eliminate the Planning Department and the Planning Commission because you ignore their.advice. The Planning Department recommended denial of the proposed project at 7200 France which requires.amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in three categories. The Planning Commission voted unanimously 8 - 0 to deny approval. Yet, in spite of all that AND overwhelming neighborhood opposition, you, the City Council, voted 4 -1 to let it proceed. So, while you are at it, throw out the Comprehensive Plan because you obviously don't follow it either. What is wrong here? Sincerely, Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. Edina, MN 55435 islandbreezes9 @i;mail.com 1 Jackie Hoogenak er From: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 2:43 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France project Please forward to: Cary Teague Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council You seem to welcome and value the professional expertise of Harvey Turner as both a former city planner and private developer. In addition to those qualifications, HE LIVES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. He has lived in the Cornelia neighborhood for 26 years. He understands the neighborhood. He opposes the proposed project at 7200 France Avenue. It is the wrong location for that development. So, when you vote to approve the proposed project, what will that say about what you think of Mr. Turner's advice? Loud and clear: NOT MUCH. Sincerely. Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. 1 J i Jackie Hoogenakker From:. Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 201411:26 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Avenue and Beyond Please forward to: Cary Teague Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council Here is a vision for the west side of France Avenue between Hazelton and 76th Street. Picture a bike path separated by grass from a meandering walking path bordered by grass and trees, similar to the paths around Lake Harriet. Commercial' buildings would be set back from the street, possibly with parking in the back with access from surface streets, not France Avenue. This would soften and humanize France Avenue, a virtual highway which on the east side in the area has multiple buildings with solid walls close to the street pavement, e.g. West Elm, Byerly's and the Galleria. It does not feel like a walking street. It feels :like "what's the fastest I can get from here to there ?" The new message would be "This is where people live and slow down and enjoy their surroundings." LET FRANCE AVENUE BREATHE! Sincerely, Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. . 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: melinda emerson <melindajemerson @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December; 02, 201412:14 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Hi Jackie, Please forward this email to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, Mayor Hovland and all members of the City Council I am contacting you to oppose the proposed development at 7200 France Ave. My family resides at 7124 Heathterton Trl and we are Very concerned about the increased traffic that will result from a development this size. When we made the decision to purchase our house we did so because we noted the minimal traffic that is on 72nd street. We have two young boys (1. year 4 years) and we value the quiet neighborhood. I'm also concerned about the increased traffic on France Avenue that this construction may cause. We like to walk to Centennial Lakes, but the sidewalk configuration and traffic is already becoming a`deterrent. The West side sidewalk of the block between 72nd Street and Gallagher is right next to the street. It is scary to walk with my children and dogs right next to cars zooming past at 40+ mph. This new development will only increase my concern with this part of the street. This development seems to counter the rest of the work being done to improve the street for pedestrians. I understand the need to improve the property at 7200 France., My chiropractor practices in that building and it is very old and out of date. However, I agree with the Planning Commission that the proposed plan.is not correct for the space. Especially concerning tome is the inclusion of restaurant space in the plan. Good restaurants can cause significant traffic and need for parking. I'm concerned about this overflow into our neighborhood in the evening and weekends. Thank you, Melinda Emerson 1 Jackie Hgogenakker From: Darla Paulson <djpaulson005 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 201412:44 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 France Proposed Zoning Changes To: Community Development Director, Edina Mayor and members of the City Council Attn: Jackie Hoogenakker Please direct the following note to Cary Teague immediately prior to tonight's meeting. We are concerned Edina residents regarding the proposed zoning changes to 7200 France Avenue. We believe the development proposed is way too.ambtious for this site. The Byerly's huge construction is underway and that is more than enough building height and density for this block. Retail and restaurants will occupy this 'area and will certainly provide adequately for the area's needs now and in the future. We worry that the proposal will add additional traffic to 72nd, a road used by many school children to and from elementary Cornelia School, on the corner of 72nd and Cornelia. It will disrupt what is otherwise a peaceful residential neighborhood. Apparently these developers purchased this property before applying for appropriate licensing. Let's not let the developers run and rule our city and determine its future. Please please please stick with your original Master Comprehensive Plan, and do not add to the already dense nature`of this lovely -area of Edina. Thank you-., Darla and Gaylord Paulson 7212 Glouchester Dr. Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackie Ho,,ogenakker From: Molly Portz <molly.portz @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:27 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Tim Portz Subject: Concerns with rezoning request for 72nd and France Dear Jackie, I am an Edina resident living at 72nd and Wooddale Avenue. I attended the planning commission meeting in November when the plans for the development of 72nd and France were presented. After attending the meeting I better understand the implications of rezoning this site and I implore the city council to reject the rezoning request and stick to the master plan. The planning commission heard the neighborhood's unanimous concerns and .1 hope the same is true for the City Council. I appreciate the opportunity to voice my concern. Sincerely, Molly Portz e9ackae Hoogjenakker From: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 201410:01 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 FRANCE and the Neighborhood Please forward to: Cary Teague Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council If you regularly drive east on 70th Street in the area between Highway 100 and France Avenue, you know there are two options. OPTION #1: If you,continue on 70th Street, you'll go 25 mph and you'll have two stoplights and a round - about, a stoplight at France.Avenue and, if you are heading south, another stoplight at Hazelton. OPTION #2: If you "make a move" and cut through the neighborhood, you can eliminate possibly four red lights, a round - about, AND you can legally drive, practically non -stop, 30mph. . Who wouldn't consider Option #2? As a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood, please do not allow a development to be built at 7200 France that would be. THREE TIMES the density that is currently allowed on that site. Sincerely, Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. 1 TO: Edina City Council FROM: Edina HRRC RE: Statement of Support for 7200 France Development DATE: December 11, 2014 . Low income and special needs housing, business, quality schools,- housing for the majority and medical and social services are desirable for diverse, healthy communities. The Edina Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code have been amended in the past to encompass needs reflective of the changes in our community and its priorities. The Metropolitan Council andthe Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (Minnesota) -both strongly oppose any effort to reduce or alter a city's authority to carry out the functions . associated with providing Affordable Housing under the recognized definitions. Funding for Affordable Housing is provided in the private sector, through Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and other resources.' Developers, land use consultants and planners have stated that high land values within Edina make. Affordable Housing additions in new and rehabilitated construction difficult to achieve. In its proposed rental apartment mixed use development at 72nd and France Ave.the Boisclair Corporation has included 20% of its proposed rental units as Affordable Housing in accord with Metropolitan Council Guidelines. These units would be available to the general community with income needs that qualify them for rental assistance or other programs that qualify for reduced rents. Accordingly, in its role as the advisor to the City Council on human relations and matters within the scope of its mission, the following statement of support is directed to the Edina City ,Council: The Application for a Planned Unit Development and necessary zoning changes for the property located at 72nd and France Ave. by Boisclair Corporation is supported by the Edina HRRC without reservation. The HRRC commends the Developer for including 20% of the total residential units for persons in need of Affordable Housing. The proposed mixed unit development will be located within an area offering employment opportunities, public transportation, a nearby elementary school and a variety of public facilities, parks and services. 'The HRRC recommends that the City Council enact any necessary changes and take all other actions needed to support this initiative, which will build a stronger, more diverse community and offer more opportunities to new residents to build this community, while at the same time signaling other real estate developers of the direction Edina chooses to pursue. i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.E. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Sketch Plan Review -4500 Valley View Road Action Requested: Provide non - binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop the northwest corner of Valley Commission staff report.) The proposal is to remodel the existing vacant gas station into a restaurant. The remodeling would include a 500 square foot addition for a new kitchen and trash enclosure, and a 640 square foot three - season porch /patio. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5- A 13.) The restaurant would be designed for 80 -86 seats including the bar area. (See page A 10.) The site is currently zoned PCDA Planned Commercial District 4, which only allows automobile service centers, car washes and gas stations. To accommodate the proposed use, the site would need to be rezoned to PCD -1, Planning Commercial District 1. PCD- I would be consistent with the existing zoning of the adjacent shopping center to the north. (See page A4a.) The proposed plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides the site for neighborhood commercial uses. (See page A4b.) Planning Commission Consideration: On December 10, 2014, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes from the December 10, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting Planning Commission Memo, December 10, 2014 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 PC Meeting December 10, 2014 Draft minute summary VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 4500 Valley View Road, Edina, MN (Restaurant) Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop the northwest corner of Valley View and Wooddale at 4500 Valley View Road. Teague explained the proposal would remodel the existing vacant gas station into a restaurant. The remodeling would include a 500 square foot addition for new kitchen and trash enclosure and a three - season porch /patio. Teague said the restaurant would be designed for 80 -86 seats; including the bar area. Continuing, Teague said the subject site is currently zoned PCD -4, Planned Commercial District -4, which only allows automobile service centers, gas stations, or car washes. Teague stated a rezoning from PCD -4 to PCD -1 would be requested to accommodate the proposed new use of the site, and a parking stall variance may also - - - -be needed. - Concluding, Teague said the proposed use is consistent with- Edina's - -- Comprehensive Plan. Chair Staunton explained that a sketch plan review is-not a public hearing; it's an opportunity for an applicant to get nonbinding feedback from the Commission on their project before they proceed with a. formal application. Staunton further noted that at this time a "work.group" is considering. a small area plan for this area, adding Commissioners Lee and Forrest sit on that group and their feedback on their progress would be appreciated. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Fitzgerald, Chuck Nolan and Paul Dzubnar Discussion Commissioner Olsen commented that she was surprised a parking stall variance may be required. She said when she is in the area it appears to her that the parking lot isn't very full, adding shared parking would make sense at this location. Planner Teague agreed. He said the proposed change in use triggers the need for more parking. Teague said at this time he believes the site would be under parked per restaurant standards; however, in reality there would be the option for shared parking. Commissioner Carr said she wonders if there is enough room on the proposed boulevard to plant trees. Teague responded he believes there would be room to add vegetation of some kind. Carr pointed out that planting on the boulevard area is an important traffic calming measure as outlined in the "living streets" concept. Commissioner Scherer asked if the site is "clean ". She noted with a gas station use there is the possibility the site could be contaminated. Teague agreed, adding an assessment would need to be done before the proposal moves forward. Commissioner Schroeder stated the parking stall delineations for the gas station and the adjoining retail center is poorly configured. He said a new reconfiguration of the stalls may lessen the need for a parking variance. Commissioner Hobbs noted with the amount of pavement integrating a storm water plan is also challenging. Applicant Presentation Peter Fitzgerald, 5217 Kellogg Avenue addressed the Commission and explained he is a lifelong Edina resident and represents the commercial property owner Fred Allis. Fitzgerald said the goal of the development team is to create a family /meet -a- friend restaurant experience. Fitzgerald said they are excited about repurposing the gas station and making full use of the garage doors to create a great outdoor dining - experience.- Continuing-IFitzgerald said-in the neighborhood- everyone has- wondered - - "what's going to happen to,Wally's ", adding the proposed renovation of the gas station to restaurant is a great opportunity to rebrand this corner creating an inviting and welcoming space for residents. Fitzgerald introduced members of the development team Chuck Nolan of Shea Architects and Paul'Dzubnar. Chuck Nolan said he is excited about designing a restaurant that utilizes the existing gas station. Nolan explained. that prelimin'a'ry, findings have found the site to be "clean "; however, more study needs to be done. With graphics Nolan pointed out the proposed addition to the rear of the building would house the kitchen, coolers and trash enclosure and the creation of 640 square feet of outdoor seating in a three - season porch /patio with retractable roof. Nolan said in his opinion this renovation and outdoor area would activate the corner. Concluding, Nolan said their intent is to create a warm and inviting community restaurant. Nolan further explained the drive access, the elimination of curb cuts close to the intersection and parking. Paul Dzubnar, told the Commission he is familiar with developing neighborhood restaurants including the Twisted Fork in the Grand Avenue /Hamline neighborhood. He stated he knows how to work with neighborhoods and how to capitalize on repurposing old buildings. Zooliner said he is excited about this project. Discussion Chair Staunton thanked the team and asked Commissioners Forrest and Lee their opinion on the project and its impact (if any) on the Wooddale Valley View small area plan-process. Commissioner Forrest said their work thus far has indicated that the residents are very invested in their neighborhood. Forrest encouraged everyone including the applicants to visit the City's website for more information on the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion the subject site could be considered the heart of the area. She said from the meetings and feedback so far the proposed use fits well with what was envisioned for the are Lee said during their discussions it was realized that redevelopment of the area would occur in steps, adding this could be considered the first step. Lee reiterated hew important this corner is in her opinion, adding it should be pedestrian friendly. Lee further commented that she is unsure if a rain garden is appropriate at this corner as depicted. Continuing, Lee also stated she would like careful attention paid to the exterior building materials. Concluding, Lee said the goal should be to create a sense of place and if done correctly this would accomplish that. She added this is a very exciting first step. Commissioner Platteter stated he gives the concept a "thumbs up ". He said some details of the plan need to be reconsidered, especially in his opinion the parking up to the street. Platteter said the Commission looks favorably at creating an active pedestrian friendly environment pointing out in his opinion this location can be considered the entrance into this neighborhood. Platteter suggested that bike racks be added, and that other pedestrian friendly amenities be included on the site. Commissioner Scherer stated she is exciting about the proposed reuse of the gas station as a restaurant, adding as previously stated this parking lot is never full and any redevelopment should create opportunities for shared parking. Commissioner Forrest said she agrees with all comments, reiterating the importance of this corner and its impact on the neighborhood. Forrest said she too would like the development team to retain aspects of the gas station . Continuing, Forrest commented that she observed on the proposed plans a half wall around the patio area; suggesting that area remain transparent encouraging pedestrian involvement. She said she agrees with the comment about the rain garden and suggested that the applicants use this area in some public fashion; maybe by adding a bench or some other form of welcome. Concluding, Forrest said she's not sure how she feels about the retractable roof element of the porch/ patio. Mr. Dzubnar responded they aren't committed to the rain garden. Commissioner Carr stated in her opinion with Minnesota weather a retractable concept makes sense. Carr said one issue about the open patio concept that could cause concern is noise.. Commissioner Schroeder referred to parking and observed parking stall counts may be better calculated according to use and not square footage. Schroeder said parking may need to be reimagined because the City doesn't want to see a site over or under - parked; and the current code may not sufficiently address how to "get there ". Schroeder stated it needs to be right. Concluding, Schroeder said retaining architectural features of the gas station is an important part of maintaining the character of the neighborhood. He encouraged the applicants to pay attention to retaining elements of the garage. Commissioner Hobbs commended the applicant on repurposing the gas station. He asked the applicant if there is the possibility the gas station would be razed. Mr. Dzubnar responded that isn't an option. Chair Staunton reiterated the Commission isn't a big fan of over - parking but wants the applicant to be cognizant of their parking needs. Adequate parking is_ important to avoid . spillage into the neighborhood that could cause issues. Commissioner Olsen commented she is supportive of the project and likes the aspect of using the garage doors to open-up the garage:.Olsen asked the applicant the hours the restaurant would be open. Mr. Dzubnar responded the restaurant would serve lunch and dinner. Chair Staunton thanked the applicants for their input and said the project as proposed is very exciting. He encouraged the applicant to work on shared parking, retaining architectural elements of the gas, station, reconsidering placement of the rain garden to something else and with further encouragement to create a pedestrian friendly experience. City Hall • Phone 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CiityofEdina.com Date: December 10, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — Restaurant (4500 Valley View Road) MEMO o e a �t4 W The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re- develop the northwest corner of Valley View and Wooddale at 4500 Valley View Road. (See the property location on pages Al -A4.) The proposal is to remodel the existing vacant gas station into a restaurant. The remodeling would include a 500 square foot addition for a new kitchen and trash enclosure, and a 640 square foot three - season porch /patio. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5- Al 3.) The restaurant would be designed for 80 -86 seats including the bar area. (See page Al 0.) The site is currently zoned PCD -4, Planned Commercial District 4, which only allows automobile service centers, car washes and gas stations. To accommodate the proposed use, the site would need to be rezoned to PCD -1, Planning Commercial District 1. PCDA would be consistent with the existing zoning of the adjacent shopping center to the north. (See page Ma.) The proposed plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides the site for neighborhood commercial uses. (See page A4b.) The table on the following page demonstrates how the project would conform to the PCD -1 Zoning Ordinance. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table MEMO * Variance Required Traffic /Parking A traffic and parking study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways and if there would be adequate parking provided. Sidewalks /Street Setbacks /Landscaping The applicant is showing some green space and landscaping in the renderings along Valley View and Wooddale, and a sidewalk. (See page A8.)The Planning Commission is asked to consider the proposed proximity of the building to the street, given the setbacks that are required and providing the boulevard style sidewalk. City Standards (PCD -1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front = Wooddale 35 feet W feet* Front = Valley View 35 feet 20 feet* Side — North 20 feet 100+ feet Side — West 20 feet 100+ feet Building Height 2 Stories or 24 -feet whichever is One story 20 less feet tall Maximum Floor Area 1.0 of the tract .20 of the tract Ratio (FAR) Tract size = 2.acres or 87,120 s.f. (18,156 s.f.) Parking Stalls (Site) 80 required for retail 127 spaces 38 required for new restaurant existing and 26 required for snuffy's proposed* 144 total required Parking stall setback 20 feet 0 feet* (existing condition) * Variance Required Traffic /Parking A traffic and parking study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways and if there would be adequate parking provided. Sidewalks /Street Setbacks /Landscaping The applicant is showing some green space and landscaping in the renderings along Valley View and Wooddale, and a sidewalk. (See page A8.)The Planning Commission is asked to consider the proposed proximity of the building to the street, given the setbacks that are required and providing the boulevard style sidewalk. i u, PHILBRUO,K LAME - _ 24 1 `j 58TH STREET .%'EST wi 5701 — - f j — Lu! LLJ 1 L [� 5900 W .._ _ _ f o-- i W - 5'3TH STHFFT WL5"I w d `- iu - !n i W 4810 c� Y + x 24 F- 10 0L ROAD w __.._W Pam efa Park �. ri 63THSTRFFIWL'IT 4303 � w Uj , � i 5104 T 4:`- 11'•R� 151ST STRFFT WFSj 24 6108y 24I ,q 450 - - Y :�11d 24 j �4s45 —i 24 I L 7 621`4D 5 1 R E L I .VEST ~i 24 ? ? E2 0 �STRE ET 1W EST 6216 m . j��I —1, .. "I � 24: 47 53RD STREET WEST - ' G J {{{- -- _... ,. y. Ln 24 A LL - _ �= 6304 -, s .. 6302 SdTH STAEET 4'.'EST OATH 51 RLET, WEST X 64TH ST6EET'vVEST - - 1 W _ W _. 24 24 24 401 U E400 24 14 4300 4015 7� ,J .._._...._... A ..._._._._...�.._..._..._...._w __ ....._...._...,�..�,.,�.._.�.�. _....._.... _....� Parcel 19- 028 -24 -34 -0091 A -T -B: Torrens Map Scale: 1" = 800 ft. N ID: Print Date: 12/4/2014 Owner F M Allis & J R Allis Market Name: Total: Parcel 4500 Valley View Rd Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Sale Commercial -Non Preferred Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Non- Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.25 acres Sale Area: 10,752 Sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 Think Green! 4C m Parcel 19- 028 -24 -34 -0091 ID: Owner F M Allis & J R Allis Name: Parcel 4500 Valley View Rd Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Commercial -Non Preferred Type: Home- Non - Homestead stead: Parcel 0.25 acres Area: 10,752 sq ft A -T -B: Torrens Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: A3 M3 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think, Green ". Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N Print Date: 12/4/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A T hi , Green! Parcel 19- 028 -24 -34 -0091 A -T -B: Torrens ID: Owner Market F M Allis & J R Allis Name: Total: Parcel 4500 Valley View Rd Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Sale Commercial -Non Preferred Type: Price: Home- Sale Non - Homestead stead: Date: Parcel 0.25 acres Sale Area: 10,752 sq ft Code: Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N Print Date: 12/4/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A T hi , Green! GARRISON W Q NANCY LA W Q W J Q^ IJ 0 rJ GARRISON Legend �� u R1 Sl,gb OxelW9 Un'a Dd. 2 Cburcb ® R -2 DouBb dxefy U,wt D'¢I. � DiM Buibn9a _ PRD -1 Pbnnetl RezCence Dig. 60TH ST W ® PRD2 penal. 5dml r1✓ V 0 J J W Y 61ST ® PRDJ PRDJ PDD -z _ RMD Repipnal Metllal Dist. PID Pbnnetl lntluslr%I D %1. _ PUD PlannM Unit D %1. OAPD Aulo— .Pa,kin9Dist. OBRAD -m. He1ila9e --- P.- Punnms OXiien Dial. N eeb, OMDDa Muetl DevelPpmanl Dist. W + E _ MDD -9 ST Q MDDB Phnn h9 DaPI November, 2012 Z g 0,� Y 0 O W in oil o e wy Wooddale Ave & Valley View Rd Zoning Map City of Edina 44 Hennepin County, Minnesota w a w 0 O a on 62ND ST W Legend C J LDR - Low Density Residential NC - Neighborhood Commercial - CAC - Community Activity Center WAR -Low Density Attached Residential 0 OR - Office Residential - I - Industrial MDR - Medium Density Residential 0 - Office - RM - Regional Medical HDR - High Density Residential - MXC - Mixed Use Center - OSP - Open Space and Parks PSP - Public/Semi- Public LAH - Limited Access Highway ii ® I Al U c�. o 0 1, ,tea i 1 ._lJ__tL7 NC MDR NC WAR N A. Future Land Use Plan WE o e g Frv� /N 44—b Engineering Dept June, 2014 Sketch Plan Narrative Project: Gas Station to Restaurant Conversion Location: NW Corner of Wooddale Ave. and Valley View Rd., Edina Subject: Sketch Plan Narrative Proposed Conversion: This presentation for Sketch Review is a conceptual design for the conversion of the present gas station into a restaurant use. The proposal is to keep and renovate the present structure of approximately 2,000 SF, remove the tanks and gas station equipment, and construct a 500 SF addition for kitchen and trash enclosure. Exterior due diligence will include closing curb cuts, defining a parking lot for approximately 22 stalls, adding perimeter landscaping, removing the current lighting to install lighting appropriate for the use, repurposing the existing sign, adding a rain garden /water retainage area, and adding a 640 SF three - season porch /patio. City and Neighborhood Betterment The proposed renovation will add a neighborhood- focused food use while removing the current gas station use. By utilizing the shopping center drive access, a number of the site curb cuts close to the intersection will be eliminated, improving safety and vehicular control on and off the site. The complete renovation of the exterior and interior of the building for the intended use will use quality materials and the latest environmentally friendly mechanical /sewer water systems. Furthermore, the perimeter green space, rain garden, controlled site lighting and defined parking spots will create a more attractive corner for the shopping center and the intersection. Zoning The proposed restaurant site is currently zoned PCD-4 and the balance of the site is zoned PCD -1. The project proposes to change the zoning of the site to a more applicable zone for the intended restaurant use. The zone type is to be determined by the City of Edina. Comprehensive Plan The current Comprehensive Plan defines the area as a neighborhood commercial zone, the proposed zoning change fits into the City's concept of a neighborhood center. We believe our plan to remove the present use will improve safety and bring an overall visual attraction and neighborhood amenity to Edina 600.00 PROMO (a) PAUL DZUBNAR I VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 2 Ar- 04A. •• '• • • ••fir.! 7�' • •• { 1. _ � �_.d •! ��: - — .•'..1,..• �: • �. '� { y¢ I ' yti ' , y Valley view Rd & 1/vooddale Ave Edina Restaurant Development 0 PA 600.00 PROMO DECEMBER LDZ U B N A R Exterior Sketch a600.00 PROMO (a) PAUL DZUBNAR I VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 7 .4j - . 1 1p NEW Restaurant Plan ENTRANCE - F 0 0 0 D r m D C m 0 600.00 PROMO (a) PAUL DZUBNAR I VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 5 Edina Site Development Ak- a600,00 PROMO(n) PAUL DZUBNAR I VALLEY VIEW& WOODDALE AVE RESTAURAN7 DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 3 Floor Plan Sketch i i I I � p � Retractable Awning I cook line 80 -86 Seats inside 0 600.00 PROMO (a) PAUL DZUBNAR I VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 6 Current Mall Tenants 600.00 PROMO (a) PAUL DZUBNAR I VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 4 CA 50TH & FRANCE DETAIL W. 49 t LU r c t I T' W I�: U. t 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL t 1 t 1 i W �,.. L i t w _ ER S City Buildings kLegend ® HOD -2 Building height shall be determined by rl 24 feet, Public School but shall not exceed 2 stories or r HOD -3 Building height shall be determined by n but shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, HOD -4 Building height shall be determined by n but 4 48 feet, shall not exceed stories or M HOD -8 Building height shall be determined by n but shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, HOD -9 Building height shall be determined by n but shall not exceed 9 stories or 108 fee HOD -� Building height shall be determined by n but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 fe HOD -12 Building height shall be determined by n but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 fe Church ER S City Buildings Private School Public School l 5'� l VALLEY VIEW & WO 5PIOALE DETAIL W >.. L4 > I, W 0.. > fE �. Sr .......... itli- 82N:..,.1 4r1� r REPORT / RECOMMENDATION 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 16, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. w .O e v hCoRrla Iasi Agenda Item M IX. A. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action IN Discussion ❑ Information ❑ .? Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Afinnesotans November 25, 2015 Jeffrey Brown CHS Administrator City of Edina Community Health Board 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: TANF Family Home Visiting Grant Project Agreements Dear Jeffrey Brown: As you know the Minnesota Department of Health is moving from an Assurance and Agreement covering three grant programs: Local Public Health Act, Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant, and TANF Family Home Visiting Program to three separate "Grant Project Agreements ". You have already received the grant project agreement from the Office of Performance Improvement for the Local Public Health Act grant funding. :. The Community and Family Health Division is in the process of completing the Title V Maternal and Child Health grant project agreement and anticipates it being sent to you soon. TANF Family Home Visiting funding is provided on a state biennium and funding does not carry across bienniums. This makes awarding and tracking this funding on a calendar year much more challenging. For this reason, the TANF grant project agreement will cover the time period from 07/01/2015 through 06/30/2017 (to match the state biennium). This grant project agreement will be sent to you in early 2015. As a transition measure, because of the delay in the start date of the TANF Grant Project Agreement and the possibility that all Community Health Boards may not be able to obtain necessary signatures on their Title V Maternal and Child Health Block grant project agreement prior to January 1, 2015, I am, by this letter, automatically extending your Community Health Board 2014 Assurance and Agreement until 06/30/2015. All provisions in that Assurance and Agreement form that pertains to the federal funds you received will continue and we will process the invoices submitted for that time period. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 651- 201 -3584 or janet.olstad@state.mn.us. Sincerely, 4,.lo.td� Janet Olstad Assistant Division Director Division of Community and Family Health cc: James Hovland, CUB Chair General Information: 651- 201 -5000 • Toll-free: 888-345-0823 • www.health.state.mn.us An equal opportunity employer Heather Branigin From: Suzie Nakasian <suzienakasian @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 20141:53 PM To: Scott H. Neal Cc: Mary Brindle; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, Sprague, Josh Subject: Tomorrow's Regional Leaders Meeting for Inter -City Passenger Rail Project Dear Scott: I am writing to followup on David Bly's invitation to tomorrow's regional leaders meeting for the South Central Minnesota Inter -City Passenger Rail Project. We were grateful to have your participation in our first meeting in October, and are eager to continue the conversation with you/Edina and other municipalities about this important regional project. I am pleased to tell you that since our last meeting, Saint Paul's Regional Rail Authority has approached us and asked to be included in our consortium, so our prospects to the east now seem as viable as those that would route us to the west. As discussed, we would like MnDot to study the viability of both options by elevating our project to Tier One status in the State's Revised Rail Plan. I hope we can count on your continued participation and support of this initiative. Please let me or Rep. David Bly know of the names of individuals who can join us tomorrow. We are eager to continue our conversation with Edina about rail development for our region. Thank you for your consideration, Suzie Nakasian Northfield City Council 507 - 649 -0382 >>> David Bly 11/18/2014 4:06 PM >>> We have scheduled our next meeting of regional leaders in which we will continue our discussion of working together to pursue with MnDot the restoration of regional inter -city passenger rail service from Southern Minnesota to the Twin Cities through Northfield. We had 20 cities and 5 counties participate in our first regional leaders meeting on October 16, and we have since welcomed the Saint Paul Regional Rail Authority to our consortium. I hope that you will be available to join us - or that you will send a representative of your city /community to join us as our planning conversation continues. Wednesday, December 3 3:00 - 5:00 pm.m. St. Olaf College, Viking Theater, Buntrock Commons Northfield Minnesota Please RSVP to me or SuzieNakasian@p-mail.com to let us know that you or another community representative will be able to join us. Attached find a draft of a letter that we want participating communities to consider signing to MnDot to express support for moving our Regional Inter -City Passenger Rail Project to Tier One Status in the State's Freight and Passenger Rail Plan which is now being revised. Moving our project to Tier One Status will make it possible for MnDot to study the viability of restored passenger rail, service between south central Minnesota communities including Owatonna, Albert Lea, Fairbault and Medford to the Metro, through Northfield on one of two extant rail lines to the North (the western alignment - historic Dan Patch alignment, and an eastern route to Minneapolis vai Saint Paul. Both routes are extant. viable and underutilized for freight! The warrant further study! I hope you or another community representative be able to participate in our continued discussion tomorrow, and that you will join with the leaders of other communities and counties along our rail lines in advocating for Tier One Status for our South Central Inter -city Regional Passenger Rail Project, and the possibility it affords for restored passenger rail service between our communities and the Twin Cities Metro! Please respond to his e-mail with your availability or the name and contact info of your designee. If you have questions about the project, feel free to email me or Suzienakasian@gmail.com of the Northfield City Council. Thank you for your consideration. Your sincerely; Rep. David Bly 612 - 327 -0119 Directions to Buntrock Commons: entrance to the Stolaf Campus from the south via MN Highway 19 off of I -35 (Northfield exsit); or from the east on St Olaf Avenue off of MN Highway 3 just north of downtown. Northfield. Campus map: http: / /www.stolaf.edu /map1 Heather Braniain From: LOIS RING <Ilydesigns @msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:30 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: .7200 France Avenue Development City Council Members: I encourage you to vote against the 7200 France Avenue proposed development. It is too much density and'is too far reaching from the original Comprehensive Plan. Lois Ring 7440 Edinborough Way Edina MN 55435 i Heather Braniain From: Sent: To: Subject: Carl Sledgister <sledgewig @gmail.com> Tuesday, December 02, 2014 7 :47 pM swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina;.Mail; Scott H. Neal; Ann Kattreh; joni ben nett12 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Ann Kattreh Weber Woods Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, and Parks & Rec: As an Edina resident- I strongly feel that the area west of France Ave S, between 40th and 42nd ( "Weber Woods ") should not be left to chance. This is an excellent opportunity for the city of Edina to expand their park system, act upon the common interest expressed by Edina residents on multiple occasions, and show that the City Council believes in its own Comprehensive Plan. Weber Woods should be acquired and preserved as natural parkland - NOT left to developers. With a seemingly endless potential for natural development and sustainable trail systems - the loss of this green space would be detrimental to Edina, SLP and MPLS. Sincerely - Carl Sledgister 1 _ F Heather Braniain From: Phil Rohrer <philipjbohrer @yahoo.com >,. Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 10ATAM t- To: Edina Mail ;= Subject: Proposed BA- 413'''' Atlas: City Council and Engineering We are opposed to proposal to tear -up and replace Amy Drive. This street does not need such drastic procedure. If you wish to cost - effectively maintain Edina roads, please limit the number of different garbage trucks that pass by every . week. We trust that there is no inkling of an idea to install sidewalks on this short road. If so, we will -move. Phil Bohrer 952- 925 -5752 1 Heather Branigin From: - Paul.Milne <paulmilne1 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject 7200 France I must say I was disappointed in the Council's action on this proposal last night. It wasn't just the outcome which sadly I was expecting, but the process and what was considered and what wasn't. First the Planning Commission recommended rejection on a unanimous 8 to 0 vote, yet none of their points were considered or discussed. Second sometime after the Planning Commission recommended rejection, an alternate proposal for a Medical Arts building somehow appeared in the local press. The Developer maintained they didn't leak it. Pretty disingenuous as where else would it have come from. Obviously they did it to pressure the Council and nobody on the Council challenged it. This left a pretty bad taste with the Cornelia area residents and leaves us to wonder what other tomfoolery they are up to. Third knowing that increased traffic would be a major issue a very quick "traffic study" suggested that the apartments would generate roughly about the same amount of traffic as the proposed Medical Arts building. If I heard this correctly the Mayor requested this the afternoon of the meeting. As such its quality of this information would seem to be questionable. Fourth considering the retail proposal I felt there was lots of happy talk regarding what kind of retail would be there. High end restaurants and boutique shops were mentioned. I'm skeptical that these kinds of retail would really work (less concern about the restaurant). In the end we all know it will really be driven by whoever is willing to rent the space. It might not be what we envision. Fifth with the very significant issues of density and traffic on the table there was a strange obsession with whether there would be a Bicycle repair area. This seems to be a very minor topic that could be addressed after the major concept is approved or rejected. Sixth it seems like there hasn't been enough thought into the effect on the school system. This is especially significant as the effect from the Byerly's project hasn't been settled as to where those kids will schooled. I thought the numbers given by the Developer were very low and we need an independent appraisal of this. I will say that the changes requested by the Council certainly improved the project with moving the. traffic entrances/exits to France Ave (if Hennepin County agrees). However they aren't enough. The project remains too dense for the space available and for transitioning into single family neighborhoods. Remember you are setting precedent for more projects in the area. Heather Branigin From: Paul Milne <paulmilnel @gmail.com> Sent:. Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: sorry that last email was from Paul Milne, 4420 Gilford Drive. 1 Phone Message to Edina Mail 12/5/14: Adele Hersey 4412 Grimes Avenue S. Edina, MN 612 - 926 -2486 Adele called to give her opinion on the land that is being sold from Minneapolis to Edina and /or St.. Louis Park. She read about this in the paper and she would like to go on the record that she would like to keep it as park land. Her kids used to play in the park r and she took walks with her husband there. Please keep is as a park. Thank -you. i FROM THE EDITORS DESK Privilege ' isn't what you think Alfred Mklng Bull The Grcle Managing Ecotor he concept of privilege is one that's both acknowledged and dismissed, depending on which side of cultural .identity one hangs one's hat. For many in the Native American community, both on the reservation and in the urban setting, privilege- is something that we see as the'cause of our oppression. It's a catch -all for the discrimina- tion we face individually and collectively. Growing up in rural South Dakota, my parents and I were followed around in retail stores in Rapid City, Pierre and Sinim Rally. Ac t,;I l .,.,f:,..... -- - --- dren has always been a matter of law, the privilege has generally been exercised by the state. Those are the direct effects of the privilege of class and economics. The indirect effects of privi- lege can be seen in incidents like the Hennepin Theatre Trust's production of "Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson," wherein Cherokee, Creek and Choctaw historical figures were portrayed by non, Native actors and written as two - dimensional car- icatures of the complex reality upon which, they were based. While early press information described the production as a "South Park " -like ironic musical that pokes fun at the tragedy, not one Native person in the audience laughed, few and far'between as they were. New Native Theatre's Rhiana Yazzie attempted to articulate -in English, the lingua franca we Natives adopted so as to explain to non-Natives why we have a right to exist — that the privilege the authors, direc- tors and audience members enjoy is not one that we Native folk don't ever get to experience. That privi- lege is not that we take the musical at face value, we are not idiots, we too know that our Cherokee brothers and sisters did not speak in pidgin English. The priv- ilege enjoyed by everyone else in the theater was that they didn't have the collective, generational trauma weighing upon them when we saw those caricatures. When we see a fashion model wearing a headdress, a non - Native person playing Native, or even a sports team with a mascot, we ask ourselves, "What do they know about us ?" When the U.S. Patent Office canceled the Washington football ream's trademark, cheers arose from all corners -of Indian country. Consequently; non'- Natives around the country continued to bemoan the march of progress for our cause by say -. ing political correctness had — yet again — gone too. far. Comments under the stories predictably began with, "I'm not racist, but ... " or "All the Native Americans I know..." and ultimately, "I'm Native American and I don't mind at all." The gap in between reason and opinion is one where most non - Native people fall deep. When a group of people say something is offensive, repeat- edly and with conviction — so much so that national advertising time is purchased to emphasize that position — it follows general reason that what is. called offensive is actually offensive. When one has to seek out history or one individual who agrees with a prejudiced position, one is no longer rea- sonable, one is -opinionated, When one is opinionated and foregoes reason for prejudice, it's a short trip to "othering" a group of people. When a group of people is othered, they have effectively lost their humanity in the eyes of the prejudiced. We who are othered become less than, we become inhuman, and when we become inhuman, it becomes easy to discriminate. Discrimination then leads to all roads of oppres- sion where might is right and majority rules. And when one is part of the majority, one enjoys a pries ilege that they never have to think about. - ers'that have made treaties, compacts with us and exercise authority over us. For non - Natives, the concept of privilege is one u that is easily dsted off shoulders with the argu- ment that they personally : -have done nothing to Natives that damage us individually and collectively. And for the most part, they are entirely correct. Most of the time, the privilege that.most of us fight are the-privileges of class and economics. However, those privileges do tend,to follow color lines, arbi- trary as they may seem in this modern age. Pipelines that cross A.nishinaabe, Dakota, Lakota, Apsialooke and Assiniboine territory - if approved, constructed and expanded — will ultimately make a profit for the,multinational corporations that build them an&for -ihe fossil fuel industry that will trans- port through?- tliem. Unfortunately,-for those tribal. citizens who`livewith the`reality of those pipelines in their' sacred ground, little to no profit will be seen and even if it is, it wiU' b.e little comfort when water becomes undrinkable and land becomes sterile from the inevitable spills that do and will happen. Five of South Dakota's tribes have submitted applications to the federal government to estab- lish, fund and exercise their sovereignty where the Indian Child Welfare Act is concerned, hoping to create tribal agencies that handle adoptions before the state of Soutli-Dakota becomes involved. While. the governor's office-has publicly supported this move, the progress of these efforts will see if the state is sincere in its des#O.:to see Native children raised.by Native families ,on -the reservation. While the right of tribes to foster and adopt its own cb.1 ` http. //www.thecirdenews.org The Circle: News from a Native American Perspective July 2014 7 14 November 2014 The Circle: News from a Native American Perspective Game day rally at U to draw crowds protesting NFL, DC team's mascot By Matt Sepic, MPR News Native American leaders and University of Minnesota students say they're expecting thousands of people to turn out for a protest against the Washington Redskins when the team plays_ the Vikings a week from Sunday at TCF Bank Stadium. Clyde Bellecourt, co-founder of the American Indian Movement,. said the DC team's name is racist and offensive. Bellecourt expects a young group of pro- testers to gather outside the stadium to speak out against the name. "We know that because we're on a uni- versity campus. We're organizing all the students," he said. "We've been doing a lot of radio, television, public rela- tions, so we're expecting over 5,000 pea plea' The National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media is •organ- izing the protest along with campus lead- ers. Aubrey Strenger with the Black Law Students Association said the univer- sity, through its contract with the Vikings, should prohibit the use of the Washington team's name on campus. "The University of Minnesota is such an influential educational body and they are in a particular place to affect change," Strenger said. University of Minnesota officials have asked the Vikings to limit the use of the Washington team's name and logo dur- ing the game. A statement posted on the U's web - site, said while the university "_`denounces the team name of the Washington team.- and other sports team names that promote negative and harmful stereotypes — the University does not believe that it has the legal authority or contractual authority under the facility-use agreement to prevent the game." Amid the controversy, team owner Dan Snyder said, in a recent letter to Washingtonis season ticket holders that the name is a "badge of honor." ga. g p''' ►° D. s � ' �` '� ¢r,' � Cy �''� � � C � � 2 19 � b C p =0 a a o o Q� �4,V -04 , e- Wi=t'' co o d �. , wp�� ' `►1 I., � a.. Q EP rp ° D p b 0• p•' b c o rD P "� w P, GO P- m l7d 0 w ,A. b on n Q C. o A -P E; ff 11 P CL M C m _ to O ��, ark rr A p. � � co � a�.�'r got p ue(s' o > a O ' z p p o eo w •,, ��. P- 15 C a O H w C'' m !y w W, O 2 March 2014 The Circle: News from a Native American Perspective Z D r Z M M NATIONAL NEWS BRIEFS HISPANIC CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP JOINS IN MASCOT FIGHT WASHINGTON, DC -'The National Council of La Raza — the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the Unified States — called on the NFL and Washington football team owner Dan . Snyder to.c ange the team's name. The council's board of directomunanin,ously voted in support of the move Oet. 26. "Our brothers and sisters in the Native American community have been clear and consistent in their call to change both terms and images that they consider demeaning. As an organ- ization commitfed to fairness and equality for all, NCLR fully supports :these efforts,". La Raza President and chief executive Janet Murguia said in a statement. "The Latino community well understands that words matter and that they can denigrate, disparage and dehumanize. We should treat all people with the respect and dignity they deserve." Snyder has promised to keep the-name, which he says honors Native people. The team cited polls show ing that a majority of Ameri<:ans — and even a majority of Native Americans in one' 10 year -old survey — do not find the team name offensive. La Raza had previously joined witli the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights — a coalition of organizations including the NAACP and the 2 November 2014 American Civil Liberties Union — in its effort to change the moniker. Last year, the conference approved a resolution:that called on the team to change its name and "refrain from the use of any other images, mascots, or behaviors that are or could be deemed harmful or demeaning to Native American cultures or peoples." "When groups like La Raza, NAACP, ADL and NCAI.are saying in a singular voice that it is time to change this offensive name, it should serve as a wake - up call to the NFL and Dan Snyder that they are on the wrong side of history," spokesman for the Oneida Indian Nation, Joel Barkin said. The.Cirole: News from a Native American Perspective m i; Q N 0 (L c a p z m- E 0 3 m Z 6 P C) t F 0 d E z z N T NEWS Anti - !!Washington team ad launched before Vikings game . . ' T he National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media launched a new anti- Washington team ad campaign though. the Minneapolis -based advertising agency Red Circle. The agency is owned by Chad Germann — a member of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. The agency works pri- marily with the hospitality industry, including many Native American casi- nos. "I was tired of people avoiding what I think is the real issue. There is no word American lexicon that is- more hurtful to the Native American," Germann said in a statement. "We're left with this ugly word. People don't talk about how ugly it is. We need to talk about it." The ad opens with a black woman looking into the camera and saying, "I am a n---." The ad continues with peo- ple of Vietnamese, Jewish, Middle Eastern, Chinese and Cuban descent speaking their own, censored racial slurs into the camera. "Why would the FCC ban all those other words and allow this one ?" asked Melanie Benjamin, chief executive of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. The ad is punctuated by a Native American man saying, I am a Redskin" "This is equally profane," the'ad says. "There's no honor in racism." The ad comes days before the Washington team is scheduled to play the Minnesota Vikings in Minneapolis. The Hennepin County board passed a resolution for the team to find a name that it says isn't racist and derogatory. Commissioner Peter McLaughlin said the nickname "has no place in the 21st century." Team owner Daniel Snyder insists he will not change the name. The word came from a time when there was a bounty on Native Ameri cans and people would kill them and present their bloody scalps as proof to get paid. "I think if people understood that and thought about it and knew what that' word really means, then maybe they'll think differently about that and maybe we can get some more effective pressure on Redskins ownership," Germann said. July 2014 NATIONAL NEWS BRIEFS PATENT OFFICE CANCELS WASIMMN TEAM'S TRADEMARK WASHINGTON, DC — The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office canceled six trademarks belonging to the Washington football team on June 18; saying they are offensive to Native Americans. .The team, which has said it has. spent millions def>rndmg trademark over the years, will appeal the dedsion, a process that could take years. The Patent Office will continue to treat the trademark registrations as though they are valid during the appeals process, according to a spokesperson. In the meantime, the teom can continue to use the logos portraying a Native American profile with feathers. If the decision is upheld, it will be hard for the team to claim ownership of its brand, a crucial step in going after the makers of unlicensed merchandise. Instead, the team will have to illustrate that it has always used the logos, rather than relying official trademark registrations. The decision came in response to a suit brought by five Native plain- tiffs. In May, 49 senators, including Majority Leader Harry Reid, sigt A a letter too NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell saying that the "team is on the wrong side of history," and that he should endorse a name change. A week later, a coalition -of 77 tribal, civil rights and religious groups, including the National Congress of American Indians The Cirole: News from a Native AmeAcan Perspective and the NAACP, signed a letter urging players to car. paigm to change the team's mascot. The team adopted its name and logo in 1933, when it was based in Boston. It had been known as the Braves but changed the name to honor William Henry "Lone Star" Dietz, their coach at the time; who-was a Native American, according to a legal brief filed by the team in a previous matter. The trademark, which was granted in 1967, has been renewed several times, but the Patent Office previously canceled the registration in 1999. A federal judge over- turned that decision in 2003, saying there was no proof that the name was disparaging at the time of registration. The team's trademark attorney Bob Raskopf said he believed this decision, like the previous one, would be overturned. Heather .113ranigin From: Barbara La Valleur <barbara.lavalleur @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2614`5:59 PM To: Walt Gregg; Mark Lidke; Bill McCabe; Sarah Rose; Faye Ellison - Mitchell; Barb Janisch Cc: Anna Pugh; Lynn Rudick; Bernice Amacher, Amy-E Kerber, Lois Ring; Chip Jones; Susie Housh;,Susie Miller, Paul Peterson;�R.ay Meifert; Dana Lappin; Kitty O'Dea; Hafed Bouassida; Thomas Raeuchle; Anne W: Miller; Sophia Munic; Jack Ready; Colin Nelson; John Swon Subject: Fwd: Reminder about Friday's photo show opening and parking suggestions Attachments: PastedGraphic- l.pdf; ATT00001.htm; Barbara's 2014 Photo Show Flier wMari.pages; ATT00002.htm Importance: High To my colleagues and former members of Public Art Edina and the Arts and Culture Commission, Edina City Council, City employees and friends: I'm beyond excited about my life's work exhibit opening; tomorrow: Love of a Lifetime: Photos from the US & Europe 1964 - 2014 at the Edina Senior Center. I would be honored if you would be able to attend the opening ` reception from 5 to 6:30 p.m. Light refreshments. My dear friend and professional musician, Mari Harris, will be playing piano and will sing at least one song during the reception. I'll be making a few opening remarks about 5:45 p.m. Given it's an open house and people will be coming and going during the 90- minutes, I wanted to suggest the following parking options. There is limited parking right in front of the. Edina Senior Center as well as,in the area around Grandview Square (which, ironically, is a circle!) There's also parking above the Senior Center in the Hennepin County Edina Library with an elevator to the lower level. There is also a ramp on the left as you enter Grandview Square. All detailed information is also listed in the box below the photo. Looking forward to seeing you there. I've already had some great press in the Edina Sun Current, my hometown paper, The Ashby Post, The Daily News of Wahpteon-Brecken ridge where I was Chief Photographer 40 years ago. And next Wednesday, there will also be a feature in the Star Tribune written by freelancer Anna Pratt. I hope you can make it tomorrow evening, do let me know if you're coming! Thanks. Warm regards, Barbara Heather Branigin From: Stephanie Vitt <stephanie.vitt @yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, December 05, 201411:01 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Nikki Dobbs; Linda Smaby; MARIE PECHMAN; catherinemarvin @yahoo.com; Jim Vitt; Chad Milnner, stephanienelson @formafeed.com Subject: Sidewalk Petition for West Side of Halifax Mayor Hovland and the members of the Edina City Council: I am looking forward to seeing you at the meeting on Tuesday. At this meeting, the Arden Park Reconstruction Project will be discussed along with my petition for a sidewalk for the West side of Halifax Avenue between 5200 and 5336. Chad Milner, Director of Engineering, shared with me that he will not be recommending the sidewalk because of its cost relative to the total funds available in the PACs fund. Further, a couple of my neighbors have called him to say they do not support the sidewalk. Despite these views, I am hopeful you will consider approving the sidewalk for the following reasons: 1. Given that the street will be completely torn up for the street /sewer project, now is the perfect time to lay this sidewalk. There may be other areas of the city that need sidewalks as well, but this is the time to Install this sidewalk while the street is torn up for a different reason. 2. Given our close proximity to the downtown Edina business district, sidewalks should be a priority. This is to provide pedestrians with a safe and continuous path to the businesses and shops at 50th and France. 3. There will be sidewalks put in on 54th Street and 52nd street between Halifax and Minnehaha Blvd. It would only make sense to connect these two sidewalks with a sidewalk on the west side of Halifax to provide a continuous path of travel with safe crosswalks at controlled intersections. Plus, it will look more "finished" to have sidewalks on both sides of the street. 4. The long -term vision for Edina is to be more pedestrian friendly - for walkers and bikers. While it might be preferable to wait to do this sidewalk, given other priorities, the time to do it is now - while we are under construction anyway. 5. Several neighbors who didn't sign the petition were concerned about damage to the trees on the street. I love the trees on Halifax and don't want to impair them in any way with the sidewalk. Based on my current understanding of the project (through the feaslbility study) the curbs on the west side of Halifax are being extended an additional 5 feet to the east. This additional space will provide more than enough room to work around any mature trees that are in the right of way. Further, the city can make the boulevards smaller to go around the trees - this has been done successfully in many sidewalk projects in Edina (including the east side of Halifax). I have copied several of my neighbors on this email - those who are pro - sidewalk and have supported the petition. I will see you Tuesday night and look forward to answering your questions /addressing your concerns. Kindest Regards, Stephanie Vitt 5216 Halifax Avenue Heather Branigin From: tpaulson @1992ventures.com. Sent Friday, December 05, 201411;08 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I am writing today regarding the proposed Arden Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project and the proposed implementation of draft Living Streets,Plan elements for this project. According to City staff, the process for the Living Streets Implementation Plan is to complete drafting the plan in early 2015, obtain public input, hold a public hearing, and present the plan to City Council for a vote. I would like to hear from each of you if you agree with the process for the plan as outlined by staff? If yes, do you think it's appropriate to approve implementation of elements of the plan before plan completion, public input, public hearing, and vote? Why or why not? If no, which pieces of the process do you disagree with? I look forward to your responses. Respectfully, Troy Paulson 5116 Juanita Ave 1 Heather, Braniain From: Ruth and Lewis Marshall <mars7101 @comcast.net> Sent_: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: building on 72nd and France Av. Hello Mayor Hovland, I have been at the last two council meetings with a concern about the redevelopment of the building site on 72nd and France Av. My wife and I have.lived at 7101 Cornelia Drive for over 20 years. We moved here from southwest Minneapolis, where I grew up, for the good schools in Edina, good city services, and a quiet neighborhood. It has been good here. My two sons received a very good education in the Edina schools. My neighbors and I are very concerned about the increased traffic-the 'proposed building on France Av. would bring to Cornelia Drive. Increased traffic on Cornelia drive would increase the chances of young children being hit by cars. Traffic is like water, it will seek the path of least resistance. In the uptown area of Minneapolis, where) sometimes work, I have seen motorists driving a short distance the wrong way down one streets.to save time. It would happen on 72nd'Street to avoid ,having to, get onto France Av. There were some other developments with high density housing done East of France Av. There were not many people from Edina as concerned about them as they are by this proposed development. This is a-residential neighborhood and it seems that if this is approved it would just be the start of continued development like it on this side of France. Please don't give the variances that would be required to allow the proposed building to be constructed. A medical office building, without stores and restaurants would be preferable. Just as an aside, I have worked as a Funeral Director at.Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapels for over 31 years. Sincerely, Lewis Marshall 12/8/2014 campaign .r2D.constantcontact.corn / render? ca= 82O9e804 -Od50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c= 021a2800- a3ba- 11e3- a842- d4ae52733b10 &ch= 021d8360- a3b... Having trouble viewing this email ?Click here ialie- DEFINNS o EXCEUENCE Dec. 5, 2014 VOLUME 3, ISSUE 16 CLASSROOM SNAPSHOT CEPS HEADLINESIFACILITIES UPDATE TEACHER TUESDAY ICOMMUNITY NEWS I EPS IN THE NEWS RIC'S REFLECTIONS I EVENTS1 DID YOU KNOW? SCHOOL WAS OUT BUT LEARNING WAS .ON Thanksgiving Break was time for creativityand learning Learning is always in action in Edina Public Schools, emen when regular classes are not in httpJ /campaig n. r20. oonstanteontact .ccn*ender ?ca= 820998040d5D- 4514- 837f-edebba54a9ab& c= 02la2800- a3ba- 11e3- a842- d4ae52733bfG&ch =021 d8360- a3ba... 1/8 12/82014 campaign. r20. constantcontactcomlrender ?ca= 8209e804 -Od50. 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab&c=021a2800 a3ba- 11e3- a842- d4ae52733bi0& h-- O21d8360-a3b... session. This was evident last week as students opted for creative learning opportunities during the Thanksgiving break. With classes ranging from Red Cross babysitter training, where students learned how to perform basic first aid and CPR, to Spy Science, in which students learned the science behind their favorite spy stories, new learning experiences could be found throughout the Edina Community Center. Click here to see photos of the different classes held last week. To learn more about learning opportunities outside the school day, brom birth through age 85 and beyond, check out Edina Community Education. EPS HEADLINES The latest stories about what's happening in our schools Edina Public Schools Named to 5th Annual AP Honor Roll District recognized for increased participation and excellent performance of AP exams Edina Public Schools has again been named to the 5th Annual Advanced Placement (AP) District Honor Roll. A total of 547 school districts in the U.S. and Canada earned a place on this prestigious list. Edina is one of 10 Minnesota school districts on the Honor Roll. This is the third time in five years EPS has been on the list. The AP District Honor Roll recognizes efforts to open AP classroom doors to a significantly broader pool of students, while maintaining or improving the percentage of students earning scores of 3 or higher on the final exam. READ MORE INTERNATIONAL THESPIAN SOCIETY INDUCTS EHS STUDENTS, CLUB Thirty -five Edina High School (EHS) students and the EHS Thespian Club were inducted into the International Thespian Society (ITS) for their 2013 -14 season. According to ITS, the average student inductee has completed more than 100 hours of excellent work in theater arts and related disciplines. READ MORE a' .0NATIONAL SPEECH & DEBATE ASSOCIATION NATIONAL FORENSIC LEAGUE EHS SPEECH AND DEBATE TEAM EARNS NATIONAL RECOGNITION The Edina High School (EHS) speech and debate team has earned national recognition for ranking in the top 10 percent in the country and has earned membership in the National Speech and Debate Association's 100 Club.There are currently more than 100 students in speech and debate at EHS. READ MORE PF http:!/ caniogn. r20. constantcontactconVrender?ca= 8209e804 -Od5O. 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab &c= 021a280O- a3ba- 11e3-a842 d4ae52733bfO &ch= 021d8360•a3ba... 2/8 121812014 campaign .r20.constantcontacioom / render ?ca= 8209e804 -Od50. 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab &c= 021a2800•a3ba- 11e3 -a842 d4ae52733bfO &ch= 021d8360- a3b... ONLINE NEWS ARCHIVES FACILITIES UPDATE Next Generation Community Forum Dec. 8, 7-8:30 p.m., Edina Comm unit yCenter, Room 349 You are invited to a community conversation to learn how Edina Public Schools is planning for a redesign of its district facilities to meet the needs of current and future learners. By focusing on learning as the constant, as articulated in its Next Generation of Edina Public. School's Strategic Plan, the district is looking at ways to align and create flexible leaming spaces that will serve it well into the future. *This forum will be recorded for playback on the district's website at www.edinaschools.orn TEACHER TUESDAY SPOTLIGHT Get to know our amazing teaching staffi ELISE SCHMIDT Art Specialist at Concord Elementary Elise Schmidt cant, remember a time when she didn't love art. As a child her mother encouraged her to create with anything and everything, and from that place she grew to love the craft. After graduating from Gustavus Adolphus College in 2011, Schmidt landed a job as a kindergarten paraprofessional at her alma mater - Normandale French Immersion School. The following year, she received the opportunity to pursue her true passion as an art teacher at Concord Elementary. Read more. Do you know a teacher or group of teachers who deserve recognition? Send your nominations to communications@edinaschools .orb to be considered for the weekly blog spotlight. COMMUNITY NEWS Important News for the EPS Community http:i /campaig n.r20.constantcontactcomlrender Ica= 8209e804 -Od50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c= 021a280O- a3ba- 11e3- a842- d4ae52733bfO &ch= 021d8360- a3ba... 3/8 12/8!2014 campaign. r2D. constantcontect .corrrrrender ?ca= 8209e804 -Od50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab&c= 021a2800 -a3ba- 11x3 -a842 d4ae52733bf0&cti--021dB360- a3b... Edina Give and Go launches new website to close opportunity gap Edina is a community that offers many enriching life and learning opportunities in academics, athletics, and the arts. But nearly 10 percent of Edina's 8,400 students struggle with poverty and it is difficult (if not impossible) for them to take part in these opportunities. This has created an opportunity gap in Edina. The 60, mission at Edina Give and Go is to close this gap and offer ALL Edina students the opportunity to GO far in life. Edina Give and Go works with teachers, social workers, and families to recognize the needs of individual students in Edina Public Schools. While keeping the identities of the students confidential, they use their website to tell students' stories and communicate their needs to the community. Visit their new and improved website at edinagiveandgo.org, read the stories of need, and be moved to GIVE so that ALL Edina students can GO. The Spirit Store open until Dec. 27 The Edina Athletic Booster Board has opened The Spirit Store to help with your holiday shopping. It is located inside the Neighborhood Ice Cream Shoppe off of Valley View and Kellogg Road. The store will be open from noon to 5 p.m. every day until Dec. 27 and features . sweatshirts, sweatpants, blankets, hats, mittens and scarves, pullovers, flannel pants, T-shirts, stocking stuffers, etc. All proceeds go to the Edina Athletic Booster Cub, which supports all Edina High School athletic teams. VEAP Holiday Toy Program This holiday season, Edina Public Schools is once again partnering with VEAP (Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People) to provide toys for parents in low- income families to give to their children. VEAP is preparing to serve up to 5,000 children this year. The goal is to provide every child a $15 gift, a book and two winter wear items, plus a game for every family. ATHLETIC 9DDSTER CLUB You can help by donating new and unwrapped gifts /toys to VEAP's donation box located at the Edina Resource Center, (inside North door #3 of the Edina Community Center, 5701 Normandale Rd.) from Nov. 17 -Dec. 11. All donations must be new items. Due to health regulations, VEAP cannot receive or distribute used items. Cash donations are also welcome and can be mailed directly to VEAP at 9600 Aldrich Ave. S., Bloomington 55420. The greatest needs are for toys for ages 0-18, winter wear items (hats /mittens /gloves /scarves), books, $15 gift cards from local retailers (Target, Walmart, Kohl's etc.) and games. Please see VEAP Holiday Toy Store Wish List to learn more. You can contact Lana Davis by email or at 952 - 848 -3921 with any questions about donating or how families can utilize VEAP's services. Take the Vision Edina survey by Dec. 12 The City of Edina has opened up the Vision Edina community engagement session to an online surveyl The survey will remain open until Dec. 12. Take the survey and provide your views about http: / /Can paig n. r20. constanteontact .corrdrender ?ca= B209e804 -Od5D- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c= 02la2800- a3ba- 11e3- aB42- d4ae52733bf0 &ch= 02ld8360•a3ba... 4/8 12/8/2014 campaign.r20.crostantcontactcom/ render? ca= 8209e8O4 -Od50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c=021a2800- a3ba• 11e3- a842- d4ae52733bfO&ch= 021d8360- a3b... the future and your thoughts on a number of key themes that are important to shape the character and future development of the city. Find the report or watch the video and take the surrey at www.EdinaMN.gov/Vision EPS IN THE NEWS '`e ��` VISION ok , s '.,• EDINA District Response to Star Tribune Article About TIES As a member district of TIES, Edina Public Schools contracts for a variety of technology products and services, as well as trainings for our staff. We do not anticipate any negative financial impact on Edina Public Schools as a result of the recent news about their financial situation. Nonetheless, from what we have heard and read about the situation, the practices highlighted in the audit do not align with our own approach and philosophy of fiscal stewardship. We look forward to TIES improving their financial operations so that they are able to continue to serve its members effectively. Read Star Tribune story. RIC'S REFLECTIONS Thoughts from Superintendent Ric Dressen The Impact of Facilities and Physical Environments on Learning Designing Spaces for Their Future, Not Our Past Edina Public Schools has always done a masterful job of using our available school facilities to compliment student learning. We've successfully repurposed, remodeled, renovated and added to our school facilities since our most recent new school was built in the early 1970s. This has been a team effort involving creative staff, expert construction professionals and a supportive community. As our school district moves forward with implementing our Next Generation of Edina Public Schools Strategic Plan, we know that our facilities and structures are integrated with the programming transformations. As a district we have been studying our facilities for several years, including the recent Facilities Advisory Task Force (FATF), comprised of students, staff, parents, alumni and community members. The work and recommendations of the FATF continues to guide School Board and administrative discussions as we work toward a concept proposal to http: / /Campaig n.r2O.constantcontactcoml render ?ca= 8209e8040d5O- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab&c =021 a2800- a3ba -11 e3- a842- d4ae52733bfO&ch =021 d8360 -a3ba .. 518 12/8014 campaign.r20.constant zntactcon-drender ?ca= 8209e804 -Od50- 4514 -837f- debba54a9ab &c= 021a2800•a3ba- 11e3a842 d4ae52733bf0 &ch= 021d8360•a3b... bring to the community for a wte in May. Throughout our study of how to improve and update our facilities to ensure they support the learning needs of current and future students, we have heard from a variety of voices on what is needed and desired. As with any remodeling or construction project, there is never enough money to do everything we hope. Yet, we are working to make sure that all of our schools and programs have the opportunity to see improvements to help advance our Next Generation work. We also know that we need to address some basic infrastructure improvements, including safety and security upgrades at our schools and fields.' The time is now to align our strategic programming efforts with our spaces, and we will do this through a collaborative approach. In the next few weeks, the Board will identify a basic framework for a facilities improvement proposal, which will then be followed by several months of information sharing, dialogue and engagement. Much of the detail work with the Next Generation spaces will play out following a community vote on the concepts. I look forward to the many staff and community conversations that will occur over the next few months. But even more, I look forward, presuming a successful referendum in May 2015, to the innovative and creative ideas that will be generated by students, staff, families and community members when we enter the design phase next summer and fall. This will be an opportunity to create classrooms and learning spaces that complement the educational needs and demands of our future students, which will require us to build a variety of learning spaces that provide flexibility to adapt to the ever changing needs of learners. Just as we know that a one size fits all approach to learning does not meet the needs of all students, so too do uniform, factory style classrooms not meet the needs of all learning styles and instructional strategies. By including a variety of spaces in our future plans, we will be able to address the needs of direct instruction as well as individual, small and large group learning. These spaces will align with our strategic programming work that include future learning experiences for early childhood, elementary (grades K -5), middle school (grades 6-8) and high school (grades 9 -12), in addition to continued learning opportunities for all ages. These next few weeks and months will go by quickly, with increasing detail and information being shared and input opportunities along the way. I appreciate how busy everyone is, especially this time of year, but I encourage all of us to be involved in this important process and stay informed on the proposals coming forward. Our current and future students are counting on us to provide diverse learning environments, both programmatically and structurally,that help all of our learners thrive and achieve. To read more about the district's facilities planning, visit www. edinaschools .oM /FacilitiesPlanning. . UPCOMING EVENTS Valley View Theater Presents: The Phantom Tollbooth Dec. 4 -6, 7 p.m., EPAC http:// campaign.r2O.constantcontactcon *ender?ca= 82O9e8O4 -Od5O- 4514. 837f- edebba54agab &c=02la2800•a3ba- 11e3 -a642 d4ae5a33bfO&ch= 02ld8360- a3ba... 6/8 12/8/2014 campaign. r20. constantcontact .comlrender7ca=820be8O4 -Od50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c= 021a2800- a3ba- 11e3- a842- d4ae52733bfO&ch= 021d8360- a3b... Valley View Middle School students in grades 8 -9 Will perform "The Phantom Tollbooth" at the Edina Performing Arts Center on Dec. 4-6 at 7 pm. The play follows the iife'of Milo, who is. always bored ! Ji with everything - until .one day a mysterious sJ package arrives. Within the package is a tollbooth`;¢ z that takes Milo to the Land 'of Wisdom, where he - meets the Watchdog, Tock, who protects time from being wasted. Together, the two must rescue Dictionopolis'and Digitopolis from the chaos that has descended since the Princesses Sweet Rhyme & Pure Reason were banished to the Land of Ignorance. In the end, Milo learns the true value of time and learning. Tickets are general admission, only and are $6 for students and seniors and $8 for adults. Tickets will be sold in the WMS cafeteria during lunch on December 4 and 5 and through the EPAC box office one hour prior to show.time. Doors open at 6:30 p.m.' South View Theater Presents: 30 Reasons Not to be in a Play Dec. 11 -12 at 7 p.m.; Dec. 13 at 2 p.m., Dragseth Auditorum South View Middle School students in grades 6 and 7 will stage a play ironically called "30 Reasons Not to be in a Play." The play features a series of hilarious monologues, duets and ensemble pieces expressing how many non - thespian students feel about performing on stage �,s'!Q►n — horror. It promises a lot of laughs and perhaps will bring back bis in a memories of your own youthful stage experiences. Tickets are general admission and are $10; $5 for students and seniors. Purchase tickets at edinaschools.org /souftA or at the box office one hour before each performance. 2nd Annual Winter Jubilee Features Music, Drama Showcase for EHS Performing Arts is Dec. 12 -13 Experience the instrumental, choral and dramatic talents of the Edina High School (EHS) performing arts students at the 2nd Annual Winter Jubilee Friday and Saturday, Dec. 12 -13.. The event features performances by the EHS concert band, concert choir, symphony orchestra and thespians, and celebrates the season with music and fun. Proceeds from this year's event will go toward upgrades and improvement of the lighting system in the Fick Auditorium. ,r. gm Performance times are Dec. 12 at 7 p.m. and Dec. 13 at 3 p.m. at the EHS Fick Auditorium. Reserve tickets by contacting ehsjubileetickets @gmail.com Last year's event sold out quickly, so don't delay! DID YOU KNOW? httpJ/ campaign. r20. constantcontactcom /render7ca= 8209e8040d50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c= 021a2800- a3ba- 11e3- a842- d4ae52733bf0 &d-021 d8360 -a3ba .. 7/8 1218014 campaign. r20. constantcontactcom /render?ca= 8M9e804 -Od50- 4514- 837f- edebba54a9ab& c= 021a2800- a3ba- 11e3- a842-d4ae52733bf0 &ch= 021d8360- a3b... Next Gen Educational Competencies Video Now Online Six educational competencies have been identified by Edina Public Schools as key to the success of Next Generation learners. The teaching of these skills and literacies is embedded in curriculum district -wide. Learn more abobt what the competencies are and how you can recognize them in action. Click here to view video Help us keep the 2014 -15 school year Hope & Happiness theme alive. Contact the communications team at 952.848.3919 or email us at communications @edinaschools.ora with news, story ideas or photosl Missed an issue of Edina In the Know? Click here for archives. 5701 Normandale Road OO� din pu li Edina, MN 55424 in M „?? y�� schmis 952848.3000 DEFINING EXCELLENCE Forward this email EVSafeUnsubsuib This email was sent to jhovland @ci.edina.mn.us by communications (aedinaschools.ora I Update Profile /Email Address I Rapid removal with SafeUnsubscribeT" I Privacy Policy. by IJ f U: NV:Fy. Edina Public Schools 1 5701 Normandale Rd. I Edina I MN 1 55424 http: / /Campaig n. r20. constantcontart .corrVrendw?c.a= 8209e8040d50- 4514- 837f- edebba54agab&c= 02la2BO(- a3ba -11 e3- aB42- d4aeW33bf0 &ch= 02ld8360- a3ba... 8/8 Heather Branigin From: Carl Sledgister <sledgewig @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:35 PM To: James Hovland; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; Scott W. Neal; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: Re: Weber Woods - Mayor Hovland - Appreciate the response. Council Members - At the November meeting in the Weber Warming House - it was mentioned that assessments would take place.and task forces would convene and report back to the community early to mid - December. Will the Town Hall Meeting Sat 12/6 from 10 -noon provide any new information, allow any opportunities for discussion regarding the•woods, or other potential developments? If not tomorrow - possibly the City Council meeting 12/16? Other neighborhood associations (West Calhoun Neighborhood Council and Fulton Neighborhood Association) are holding forums next week, but would be nice to know what progress Edina has made. Thank you Ca rl On Dec 3, 2014, at 3:11 PM, James Hovland wrote: Carl, thanks for the email. We are carefully assessing the opportunity and our city team has a meeting within the next few days with SLP officials on the matter. I appreciate you taking the time to write to us. James B. Hovland, Esquire HOVLAND & RASMUS, PLLC Southdale Office Centre 6800 France Avenue S., Suite 190 Edina, MN 55435 ihovland@hovlandrasmus.com Phone: (612) 874 -8550 Direct: (612) 874 -8551 Fax: (612) 874 -9362 Cell: (612) 961 -6192 - - -- Original Message---- - From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunnoC@EdinaMN.sovl On Behalf'Of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 8:46 AM Subject: FW: Weber Woods Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952-826-0389 lbiunno @EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.eov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - -- Original Message--- - From: Carl Sledgister [mailto:sledeewis @igmail.coml Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 7:47 PM To: swensonannl @email.com; Edina Mail; Scott H. Neal; Ann Kattreh; ionibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; ioshsprasue @edinarealty.com; Ann Kattreh Subject: Weber Woods Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, and Parks & Rec: As an Edina resident - I strongly feel that the area west of France Ave S, between 40th and 42nd ( "Weber Woods ") should not be left to chance. This is an excellent opportunity for the city of Edina to expand their park system, act upon the common interest expressed by Edina residents on multiple occasions, and show that the City Council believes in its own Comprehensive Plan. Weber Woods should be acquired and preserved as natural parkland - NOT left to developers. With a seemingly endless potential for natural development and sustainable trail systems - the loss of this green space would be detrimental to Edina, SLP and MPLS. Sincerely - Carl Sledgister RE: 6432 Sherwood Avenue, Edina, 55435 Dear Mr. Neal, Enclosed is voluntary payment in I ieoOtaxes for city services. We appreciate being a member of the community and wa" quan our participation. 0 l6S Bruce Torgqfson Chief Operations Officer Enclosure 1 �O 1 MOUNT OLIVET November 21, 2014 I ROLLING ACRES 18986 Lake Drive East Mr. Scott Neal Chanhassen, MN 55317-9348 City of Edina 4801 West 50t' Street Main 952.474.5974 Fax 952.474.3652 Edina, MN 55424 www.mtolivetrollingacres.org RE: 6432 Sherwood Avenue, Edina, 55435 Dear Mr. Neal, Enclosed is voluntary payment in I ieoOtaxes for city services. We appreciate being a member of the community and wa" quan our participation. 0 l6S Bruce Torgqfson Chief Operations Officer Enclosure 1 �O 1 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr, Mayor, Subject: Kangaroo Court December 6,•2014 I am writing to you to see if you actually know what goes on in the Hennepin County Traffic Court in Edina. As a bit of background, in October I received a speeding ticket. I was going 40 mph, and I accept the consequences. 1 did it, andwas willing to pay the fine and learn, from it. I went into the courthouse to pay the fine. The clerk said "are you sure you don't want to meet with someone? Your record is completely clean, and perhaps they could reduce the fine and/or get it off your record." I said, "I didn't' know you could do that ?" I'm not familiar with'the procedures. So I met with a woman who said she could reduce the fine to $100 (from $145), but that ONLY A JUDGE could get it off my record, and suggested I try to do that by appearing before said JUDGE. My husband and I went into'traffic court on December 4. A prosecutor addressed the group, saying "listen up, there is a Judge's conference in town, and the Judge will not be able to attend, so we'll make this easy on you. Fill out the 2 forms, and we'll call you up one at a time. The cost to everyone is $225 plus a surcharge. We aren't employed by the court, so we need to be paid too." He was. really arrogant and rude. He even yelled at an African American woman who got too close to his chair saying, "don't walk behind me, it gives me the creeps! Everyone heard that. When I sat down with one of the prosecutors, he said "Sign here." No questions, no discussion, nothing. I asked why the fee was now more than double the original fine. This was the first time he said "pay the $100 then, but it will stay on your record. If you want to take a chance on your insurance being raised or cancelled, you will pay the fee." I said. "can I discuss it with my husband ?" He smirked and said "well, if you feel you need to." I then agreed to pay the cost of getting it off my record, and when I went to pay, only the did I find out that the surcharge was $75. So the cost of getting this ticket off my record was now at $300 (triple the original fine). I thought only a JUDGE could make this determination. If this is how the court system works, so be it. But the people in that room were not hardened criminals, but there to pay traffic fines, and didn't appreciate being talked down to. Just thought you'd want to know. And if you're planning on having someone send me a form letter, saying "thanks for your input ", save the stamp. What I'm really interested in is your opinion. Mrs. Wendy Hutchins 5700, Hyland Greens Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 952 -457 -6897 Heather Braniain From: mr beckman @hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, December 07, 201412:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact. Us form submission Name: Dave Buchanan Organization: Website: Address 1: 4616 Casco Ave. Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: mr_beckman e,hotmail.com Phone: 952- 929 -6343 Referrer: about town or other city _publication Message: On Monday, Nov. 1,7 Scott Neal met with residents at the Weber Park warming house to talk about how the Mpls. waterworks property could be used. I was unable to attend that meeting but want to give my suggestion now. I'd love to see this property, or at least a portion of it, as a dog park. The whole site as is but with a fence all the .way around it and designated as an official dog park would be ideal. I think if the city bought the land and had a fund drive to pay for the fencing, plenty of people would see the value in it and contribute money. Even as a dog park, children could still get out in nature and play in the area. If it's not possible for the entire area to be a dog park, having at least a portion of it as dog park would still be great. The key is to leave the property as natural as possible. The city would have minimal upkeep in the park. It could be left to nature as it is now. This property has a high monetary value but an even higher recreational value. Dave Buchanan 1 Heather Braniain From: Bradley Smith <smith.bradc @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 3:52 PM To: Amanda Holle; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Subject: Tire Crumb on new Braemar-Field Ms. Amanda Holle, visited the new Braemar indoor turf field on .Saturday with my two children. Wonderful facility. However, I was wondering ; "about the fill -in matter on the, , field. Is this tire crumbs? If not, fantastic... there are many new, non =tire crumb replacement materials available. If it is, are you aware of the growing, amount of data supporting the fact that fire crumbs carry carcinogens? While proving the causal effects regarding respiratory issues and cancers is a long testing process, the existing data is compelling. Many: universities and some towns are already incurring the costs to remove tire crumbs from parks and turf facilities. Being an ex- college athlete and having contacts with coaches at several universities, I do know that many coaches are avoiding existing turf fields, opting for: inferior grass surfaces due to the apparent risks. I have attached some sites reporting on the risks as well as an excerpt below. I would be interested in your comments. Thanks, Brad Smith 6017 St Johns Ave http:// www.ehhi.oriz/reports/turf/health effects.shtml httn: / /www.ceh.org/get- involved /take - action /a- cocktail -of- harmful - chemicals -in- artificial- turf- infillI hM2://www.nbcnews.com/ news /investigations/hiOi- school - cancels- crumb - rubber- turf- field- after- nbc- report- n226606 1 http: / /www.gpa.jzov /nerl /features/tire crumbs.html "Artificial turf that uses infill' made from recycled tires ( "crumb rubber ") contains a cocktail of toxic chemicals, including benzothiazole, carbon black, and heavy metals. As the Mt. Sinai Children's, Environmental Health Center has written: "Exposures to chemicals present in crumb rubber at very high levels, typical of.animal or occupational studies, are known to cause birth defects, neurologic and developmental deficits, and some can even cause cancer. Children are particularly vulnerable to toxic threats. Children have increased exposure to toxic chemicals due to the unique way they interact with their environment. Because they are growing and'developing, their bodies are also more susceptible than adults to chemical exposures. Crumb rubber contains benzothiazole, which "exerts acute toxicity and is a respiratory irritant and a dermal sensitizer." [ii] Carbon black, which makes up 20 -40% of crumb rubber, has been identified as a cancer - causing chemical by California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Another concern is allergic reactions to. the latex in crumb rubber." z Heather,Branigin From: Olson, Kit <Kit.01son @edinascho6ls.org> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:16 PM To: Lisa Kaczke (Sun); Edina. Mail; Lauryn Grimes Cc: Kevin; BobStewart4Edina @gmail.com Subject: Fw: FIRST Day in Edina - Saturday, Dec 13 - VVMS Hello- Just wanted to pass this info along;.more than you want.to know, but just in case it may save you some time searching on your own. Mayor Hovland, it will be great to have you join us on Saturdayl Sincerely, Kit Olson Kit Olson Advanced Academic,and Gifted Resource Teacher FIRST Tech Challenge Coordinator Kit.Olson @edinaschools.org 'Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. involve me and I learn." Ben Franklin From: Olson, Kit Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 2:26 PM To: IVV All Staff Cc: Dressen, Ric; Burke, Valerie; Smasal, Randy; Mark Lawrence; Cheryl; Vicki; John and Kris Pastor; Mark T Schleusner; Lindley, Nathaniel M; Buettner, Steve; Schwartz, Robert; Berndt, Timothy; Purdy, Alyson; Laurie Shimizu; bboy zigi (Google Drive); Evan Pastor (EApps); Josh Felton; Howard Fulk; Tanya Snyder; Michelle Langefels; yu lu; Taylor Polomis; Haggerty, Fred; Mcginley, Karen; Perardi, Kate; Wattson, Erica; Hanson, Felicity; Richards, Debra; Plasch, Erin; Felton, Gina; Gamble, Jolynn; Nielsen, Susan; Olson, Kit; Tessmertuck, Paul;. Michaelson, Bethany Subject: FIRST Day in Edina - Saturday, Dec 13 - VVMS Hello fellow. VV staff, �us��wa���al you �o b� ��u�re��ha��t�eF _�- ��bz��'s��►���tr.��C��g��v Next Saturday,.all 4 levels of FIRST programs will be showcased here at VV and in the EPAC atrium. And in honor of this amazing gathering of excited students and mentors, The Edina City Council and Edina's Mayor, Jim Hovland, have officially declared this Saturday as FIRST Day in Edina. . am sharing this information with all of you for two reasons. 1 1. If you think this would be something you or your own kids would be. interested in participating in down the line; this will be a great venue to see: it all in one spot. Free;entertainmentl 2. [just wanted you to be aware of the buildings use next weekend just in case you were hoping to stop over for some quite work time... You will be disappointed. if that is the case. Also, in order to prevent problems for the robots communicating with the field, the WiFi will be turned Win the building. We appreciate the support of DM TS in making this happen. Read on if you want to know more; If not - Valley View is the host site for 2 parallel tournaments: A 24 team FTC Qualifier tournament and a 32 team FLL qualifying tournament. The FRC 1816 - the Green Machine is hosting a metro area Jr.FIRST Lego League event in the EPAC atrium that morning as well and offering an opportunity for our guests to get up close and personal with some of their past creations that have participated in the international FIRST Robotics Challenge. L Jr. FLL, a STEM enrichment program for students ages 6 -9, is rather new to this community and we are please to be able to host this as well. Edina Mayor Jim Hovland and Superintendent Ric Dressen will'be on hand to greet these students from around the metro area and have a chance For specific information regarding Edina's Jr. FLL event: http: //www.usfirst.org /whats - going -on /event /15265 ?ProgramCode =JFLL FLL is open to students in grades 4-8 and we will have students from all over the state gathering here to show their stuff) This includes 5 teams from the community;'many being mentored by our current or former students on FTC or FRC teams. FTC is open to students in grades 7 -12. It is complex enough that high school students are challenged in a different way than our middle school students. For many districts, this program is the option of choice for their middle and high school students due to both it level of challenge and affordability. To see this years challenge: https: / /www.youtube.com /watch ?v= ABmBxCwHV94 2014 - 2015 FTC Cascade Effect - YouTube Welcome to the 2014 - 2015 FTC Cascade Effect! After watching the Game Animation, please be sure to read the FTC Game Manual Part II for a detailed descripti... Watch now This will give you a better idea about the field and all those wiffle balls in the lounge! Competition rounds will start at appx 10:30 and continue until appx 5 pm. Although they will take a break for lunch, there will be plenty to see at any time. The FTC and FLL events will last the full day on Sat. We start setting up at appx 4 pm on Friday and will be using appx 2/3 of the second floor. We will not be using any spaces on the 1st floor. I am the director of the FTC event and parent, Kris Pastor is the director of the FLL event. We are working closely with our wonderful custodial staff and FIRST's state affiliate partner, High Tech Kids, a fantastic non - profit committed to STEM education opportunities for Minnesota's students. Also: Thanks to our own Jodi Ramirez has volunteered to serve as hardware inspector on Sat am and to Ward Jensen, who is kindly mentoring 2 teams of 100% rookies, along with a great team of parents. Those two teams will be competing In their first FTC tournament here. It has been fantastic to see these two teams, come together and apply what they are learning in our science, math and PLTW classrooms to the annual challenge. Alan Lu (11) will serve as one of the emcees, (yes- there may be break dancing!) Josh Felton (9) will be DJ for the event and Evan Pastor (12) will serve as our lead technical engineer, working closely with the technical staff from High Tech Kids. Information about the 4 levels of FIRST: Sport for the Mindl Jr.Lego League http: / /www.usfirst .ore /roboticsproerams /ir.fll FIRST Lego League: http: / /www.usfirst.org /roboticsproerams /fil Welcome to FIRST LEGO League I USFIRST.org FIRST Lego League engages younger students with real -world engineering by challenging them to build LEGO -based robots to complete tasks. Read more... FIRST Tech Challenge: http: / /www.usfirst.ore /roboticsproerams /ftc Welcome to the FIRST Tech Challenge I USFIRST.org The FIRST Tech Challenge is a robotics competition that allows students to compete head to head using a sports model. Read more FIRST Robotics Challenge: http: / /www.usfirst .ore /roboticsproerams /frc Welcome to the FIRST Robotics Competition USFIRST.org The FIRST Robotics Competition is an international high school robotics competition that gives students real -world engineering experience. Read more... Thanks for your understanding and support. I do encourage you to stop by if your are so inclined as it is always fun to watch. Or if you know of a student or neighbor who may be interested in learning more about any of these programs, please feel free to pass this information along. There will be many FRC, FTC and I'LL students and families available to answer questions they may have. Sincerely,. Kit Kit Olson Advanced Academic and Gifted Resource Teacher Heather 6ranigin From: oconneligang @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, December 07,2014 1186 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cary Teague Subject: 7200 France Project Mayor and City Council members, I am a resident in the Cornelia. neighborhood and have concerns a questions about.the proposed redevelopment of 7200, France Ave. Questions: 1) If the county doesn't approve the access to the property off of France, how would each member of the Council vote on this project? In otherwords, would you approve this project with access ,off of 72nd street only? 2) The city staff and the Planning commission have publicly stated that they are not in favor of this project proposal as it currently stands, with the planning commission unanimously against it. Why has the city council voted to move forward with this, when Planning and staff are not in favor? During the recent city council meeting, the comment was made that there hasn't.been this kind of turnout in favor of following the city's comp. plan, and no one came out for the discussion on the Lennar site. As a, resident in this area, I was not aware of the Lennar site until after the fact, same for Byerly's, and the Southdale parking lot project. This project came to my attention, because a neighbor was notified, as required by law due to his property, being within a certain proximity to the project. I became aware of all the other projects, when I saw a flier in the Sun current. As a resident of Edina, I came to the meetings when we developed the comp. plan, and I gave my input. My understanding was that the city develops a comp. plan with a broad input, and "then follows that. I didn't think the residents needed to.attend the city meetings to make sure we were following the comp. plan. Now, that I am aware, I am writing you with the following concerns. 1) School impact. I heard in the recent city council meeting that the 7200 France project will add up to 50 more children to the school. Byerly's is under discussion as to which school it will impact, Southdale parking lot: project will impact Cornelia. To make, you aware, there are between 500 -600 kids at Cornelia. Due to the recent decision to have full time kindergarten, the school had to build more classrooms., No' increase in population Just full time Kindergarten. In the coming years, there will be most likely another —100 kids. That means taking out more land space for more construction of classrooms. But, the general facilities are already taxed beyond their limits. The library, lunch room, gyms, playground, etc.... weren't built for such a. population. Lunch is already from 11.00 - 1.30. Adding more kids will drive an-all day lunch program. Just an example of what all the new housing units will do to the school. I'm glad to hear the city is meeting with the school this week to discuss these matters, but I don't know the discussions are this clear. 2) My biggest concern is the density of the current proposal, and what will happen with the rest of this section of France Ave (66th to 78th). If you drive up and down this section of France, there are many properties similar to this one with plenty of opportunity to redevelop, with older smaller buildings sitting on larger acreage lots. Going from 0.5 FAR in the current comp. plan to —1.5 is a significant variance. Have we thought through all the impacts to the city? Water, sewer, police, fire, streets, sanitation, snow removal, etc....? And I'm not just talking about what the one building will do, but a larger redevelopment of this area? Obviously, it's not only coming, it's here and started, upwards of 1,000 new housing units already under construction or in planning phases. Are we ready for that? And maybe a few thousand more? 3) What happens to this property in the long term? My concern is with such high density, can this property be maintained and updated as needed over time. Initially everything is new and shiny. No problem getting tenants at the rates we need. But I've seen other properties start out that way, and over time the rents don't keep up, because the property becomes less desirable. For example, the Park Lawn apartments in the 1980's were a great place to live, as I know people who have lived there at that time. Now, I know people who live there, and it isn't all that great. The buildings look OK from the outside. But I've been in them, and the interiors are not well maintained. I can only guess that is due to the low quality of the build, and the small living space. This comes back to my primary concern about density. How do we assure ourselves that this dense property will be maintained and not become run down? I'm not saying we should deny redevelopment. It will happen with or without the city's cooperation. Builders can redevelop within the current comp. plan without the city council approval. What I am saying, is that we should take a moment to reflect on what we as a community want to see this part of town look like, and then encourage the developers to meet that vision. I think if the city council granted the planning commissions request to do a mini comp plan for this, it would go a long way in developing a strategic long term plan that will be welcomed by residents and developers. Currently, developers know they can buy property in the city, come in with an oversized plan, reduce is slightly, and get a significant exception to what they should be building. If a the developer of this property is a reasonable developer, they will wait a few months for us to figure out what is going to work long term. They won't jump to build a small office space property, if they know that there will be something better in a few months. As a final thought, here is a proposed process to keep the comp. plan fresh and current, while also keeping the community involved. 1) Build a comp. plan with community involvement. This is what we already do, and I have already been to meetings for the next comp. plan and have given my input. 2) We follow the comp. plan as a city in general. The city will be carrying out the intent of what is designed. 3) If a modification to the comp. plan is needed, the community should be notified to give input, and as a community, we can adjust and decide collectively what we want our city to be. 4) Builders can build within our current vision of what we want the city to be, by following our comp. plan, or asking us a city to adjust. Expectations will be clear for the developers. If they think the comp. plan needs to be adjusted, they will know to expect a reasonable process to do so. Thanks for listening to me, and'please:allow this significant. decision to be given the proper time it needs to come to a reasonable solution that works for all. Cary Teague, Please forward,this o'n' to the :Planning Commission. Tom O'Connell 7333 Oaklawn Ave. 952- 649 -7125 3 Heather Branigin From: peill @aol.com Sent: Monday, December 08, 201412:51 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Scott H. Neal; swensonannl @gmail.com; dan.boivin @mspmac.org; jeffrey.hamiel@mspmac.org Subject: Edina Temporary Noise Monitoring Tower Report Mayor, I am writing to ask if you would like MAC staff to make a presentation to the Council on the results of the temporary noise monitoring towers in Edina. I realize that the report has been sent to you, but my thought is that it might make sense to have staff present directly to the Council so that Council Members are fully informed about the results of the project and can get their questions answered. If this makes sense to you, please let me know and I will get working on a date for a presentation. Lisa Peilen Heather Branigin From: Cora Ellenson -Myers <cora @environmentminnesota.org> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 2:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Environment Minnesota Clean Water Letter Attachments: MN elected officials letter.docx Dear Mayor Hovland My name is Cora Ellenson- Myers; I'm the Campaign Organizer with Environment Minnesota working.on clean water. I'm writing with an update on the EPA's proposed clean water rule, and to see if you can sign on to a letter supporting clean water to Senator Franken. As I'm-sure you know, right now the EPA is'considering moving forward with a rulemaking to close loopholes in the Clean Water Act. These loopholes have resulted in a costly and inefficient process of case' by case evaluation to determine if individual water bodies are protected by the Clean Water Act, and have called into question the protections of 47000 miles of Minnesota's streams, and 2 million miles across the country. This is a big priority for Environment Minnesota — it could be the biggest victory for clean water in more than a decade. As you might guess, the polluters who created these loopholes have gotten their allies in Congress to attack the proposal at every turn. This fall, they passed a bill in the House to strip the EPA's authority to make the rule, and similar attacks could come up in the Senate in the coming weeks. Fortunately, Senator Franken has historically been an ally for clean water, but is getting a lot of pressure from the opposition. If we're going to get these protections over the finish line, we'll need as much support as we can get from Senator. Franken. Environment Minnesota is circulating a letter from elected officials urging the senator to be a champion for Minnesota lakes and waterways across the state, and we would love for you to add your name. Can you review the attached letter and let me know if you can sign on by December 19th? If we show a big wave of support from elected officials across the state, we can make sure Sen. Franken keeps standing up for our waterways. Thank you, Cora Ellenson -Myers Clean Water Campaign Organizer Environment Minnesota O: (612) 379 -1475 C: (218) 341 -8045 The Honorable Senator Franken 60 East Plato Blvd Suite 220 Saint Paul MN 55107 Dear Senator Franken, As elected officials across Minnesota, we write you to urge you to declare your, support for the Clean Water Rule proposed by U.S. EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers.to restore Clean,Water Act protection to thousands of waterways here in Minnesota.and across the country. As elected officials, we know ;how critically important clean water is to the health and economic livelihood of people across our state. Our constituents need clean water for drinking, fishing, swimming; agriculture, recreation, and the wellbeing of their communities. Waterways like the Mississippi River and Lake Superior are part of what make Minnesota beautiful, thriving, and prosperous._ But our waters' health is threatened. Beginning in 1972,'the Clean Water Act protected all of the nation's waters, from small, unnamed streams to.the cherished Mississippi. But now, because of two bitterly-divided Supreme Court decisions (SWANCC in 2001 and Rapanos in 200.6), many of our waterways are not guaranteed protection from pollution, including the streams that feed our lakes and rivers, and wetlands that help keep them clean. Here in Minnesota, the threat is serious. Until this loophole is closed, 51 percent of our state's streams lack clear protection of our nation's bedrock environmental law. According to EPA data, these waters help provide drinking water to over 970,000 Minnesotans'. To protect our treasured 10,000 lakes, we urge you to take a public stand in support of the proposed rule to restore critical protections to these waters under the Clean Water Act. By restoring Clean Water Act protections we can put all of Minnesota's waters back on track to becoming safe for swimming, fishing, and drinking. We appreciate your commitment to protecting Minnesota's waterways, and we hope you will:move quickly to ensure they are protected for years to come. Sincerely, lhttp: //water.epa.poy /lawsregs /guidance /wetlands /upload /2009 12 25 wetlands science surface drin king water surface drinking water mn.pdf Heather Braniain From: David Bly <Rep.David.Bly @house.mn> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 3:56 PM To: David Bly Subject: Inter -City Passenger Rail Attachments: MNRailMap 2014_1_l.pdf, Inter -City. Regional Passenger Rail Route Options form So - Central MN through Northfield to the Twin Cities Metro 1 1.png; SUGGESTED LETTER TO MNDOT 1 1.doc i You have received a -mails in the past about our effort to support a MnDOT study in the State Rail Plan for South Central Inter -City Passenger Rail. Some of you indicated you were interested but unable to attend. We had another, meeting Dec. 3rd. The meeting went very well and several attendees plan to send a letter to MnDOT supporting the Tier 1 study of this project We would appreciate anything you could do to help with this as well. I have attached a draft letter and two maps (one the state freight rail map and the other the two options for the passenger rail route; one through St., Paul, the other through Minneapolis). If you would like more information or to ask me about this process I would be more than willing to visit with you and if time allows to be available to help with a local meeting. We are hoping to have a website about our effort to advance passenger rail to our region up and.running by next week: Please contact me with any questions. Here is information that we handed out at the Dec. 3rd meeting: Letter of support to MnDOT, by 12/31/14 if possible. Address letters to: Dave Christianson, Project Manager, Dave.Christianson@state.mn.us cc: Dan Krom, Passenger Rail Project Manager, Daniel.Krom@state.mn.us Enlist local stakeholders (businesses, institutions, chamber of commerce, school districts, colleges, etc.) to write letters of support to MnDOT. Organize public and stakeholders to offer comments /input to MnDOT through the MnDOT Rail Plan Project Website by 1/15/15: httg: / /www. dot. state. mn. us /planninciLrailr)l_an /comments.html Thanks for any help you can offer. Rep. David Bly rep.david.bly @house.mn 612 - 327 -0119 1 ANN MINNESOTA FREIGHT RAILROAD MAP Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations oi:,po July 2014 t LEGEND Major Railroads (Class 1) Other Railroads BNSF (1,584 Miles) Class II, III & Private (821 Miles) CN (425 Miles) Out of Service CP (1,179 Miles) �' Out of Service I ' s o n , - ° ° - Abandoned Lines M N ^ ^^ � UP (435 Miles) P ml n ZR0seaLi we 01 Lake or I he W a s I; "n a r s all U1! o o d s '�7 C� „r✓'� � yyy R K o o c h b a 11 1 n g i G1 in'- Z - Oell rarn 0 i F ri 6 ii i Grand - �S'Jc•�'- � - e. S f�' Louis ^a Codk K�•a Forks S' I e I F yl\ r J o I k ago, ri r� el Cl, ;` L e T r a I I I Z `1 A B SE 1 Bemidji 11. :1 C a -- N o m n O i rYSF `1��_ 'r C O C as hialejrr r hIUhba E1 m K a s s �� �� r G a y V e r_ h r rP -ir f • \s eN Z y Fargo r \ Sp a5 RAILROADS Moorhead r I 1 I Class I Railroads: Diu BNSF - BNSF Railway n > r; r. y S� v iµa �' II 11 /`� -i! �I \� Cloquet Superior CN- Canadian National n i r ISI �.' - CP- CanadianPacific U I r E r r {1 i I Ic i n r r y "r UP- Union Pacific W111 it i e! ^' la ll y l d _ -- O 1, i a l i 'jA A / Class I Subsidiaries: � Q i Ati FFaIIsns w Brainerd r *� 9 CEDR -Cedar River t. I a n rl d► s _ _. -_ DME - Dakota, Minnesota, & Eastern s C,4 7 n.1 r1 ' ,.' I i P i I DMIR - Duluth, Missabe, & Iron Range irl a r II r a v f I s I ! `�, i ®:; "'� c'� I I I 1Lr . DWP - Duluth, Winnipeg, &Pacific ` ' = " " MM - Minnesota & Manitoba t C+ a IJ y r < l a t: c , ^� } ' SOO -Soo Line r r c y Ei u n WC - Wisconsin Central n I rR V BNS - r t ` C ; -° - uk Rpid — - - - -- Class 11 Railroads: r h o p e Ol °-� 1 � r :u Saas RCPE - Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern — p' ^ St. >� ' %� arils 1 r r �, Class III and Private Railroads: _ —_ Cloud - 1, l F• vj 1: N I T. — CODX -City of Duluth I _ ,, I g Buffalo ,- / _ _ CTRR -Cloquet 1 c• + N S ce i i [ Sp ;3, Tenninal SN F CA' y;' I . MDW- Minnesota, Dakota & Western f: o G Willmar p' II r MNN -Minnesota Northern q I1 e� I _ :; -•_ I S� - - .e - :;� , 1 MNNR - Minnesota Commercial I �� " . Pahl' MPLI- Minnesota Prairie Line d) C MSWY- Minnesota Southern `1 1-, ; n v '� NLR - Northern Lines NPR- Northern Plains r r�i r -r 11 ry ,1 d NMCZ - NorthShoreMinin g 1 _ i`r'v: i n Mararl�n r; -I h I E V Ro�thfid_ Red r, 1 , „ NSSR- North Shore Scenic Win OTVR - OtterTail �T Valley C' i 1 0 \ O -0 �'" r I Gr g PGR - Progressive Rail -� - -- CCP. ( p flew h }' RRVW -Red River Valley &Western r; - 1 i It I .� r ®. ;Farihault -_ r I r ulm ;, SCXY- St Croix Valley I s c� rl itn. r_r rV7 Tj • "�` /la r c �n vv q MankatoOwafonlaa (00�- W I TCWR -Twin Cities & Western inona ZLTV - LTV Steel Mining I Ir,r �nr r 1 I\ S c l I Rochester �j 1 -nr i It n n a Onalaska 1 t, 1 .� 111( y r- i-' �ii� •� i °q TI'z Ms r ^�� _ 1 - La Crosse fl e O UP Austin` _ y ri'I'"t 4J I r C) r_� .1 rn Q' 1\ ~` y Fairmont 1 1 y N =. I it u n� . i -.or Wort agton ` , 1 Albert , .' —_ 1 II J r l r _'.r Fs�l -II: .J �. I2, {.S- 1.J 41 II 0 20 40 80 120 160 '1' I Miles r d Ll I IV! B-1 nn Ed — Mle .: KIM 1.4c) iNd Ll I SUGGESTED DRAFT LETTER TO Mn DOT `- December -2014 From Participating Municipalities and Counties in support of the South Central Minnesota Inter -City Regional Passenger Rail Project SUGGESTED DRAFT FOR CONSIDERATION BY CITIES, COUNTIES, EMPLOYERS 'INSTITUTIONS AND OTHER REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS. Dear We the` undersigned governmental entities have met to explore a common interest in pursuing restored inter -city regional passenger rail service from south central Minnesota to the Twin Cities on existing rail lines through Northfield. We unanimously support restored intercity regional passenger rail service between our south central Minnesota communities and the Metropolitan area, as well as the potential inter -state rail connections that our particular rail line would open for Minnesotans by virtue of the intersection of our line with 3 of Amtrak's most heavily trafficked inter -state lines, immediately to the south of us (Kansas City and Des Moines). We feel strongly that this project presents sufficient merit as'to warrant serious study for possible development in the next five years. The 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan identifies the Northfield — Metropolitan corridor for Tier II development. Elevation of rail service on one of the existing rail lines connecting Northfield to the Twin Cities to Tier One Status for purposes of an evaluative preliminary study is more than justified by the forecasted levels of usage, the apparent technical and financial feasibility of this project in comparison to other proposed passenger rail projects, and the enthusiastic support of the undersigned affected communities. We strongly encourage MnDOTto elevate restored regional inter -city passenger rail service from south central Minnesota on existing rail lines through Northfield to Tier One status in the State's revised Rail Plan, and urge MnDot to commence an evaluative study of that routing as part of your statewide rail planning. Respectfully, Heather Branigin From: ANNE LEE GARY LEE <gandalee6 @q.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:30 AM To: Edina Mail ; Subject: Attention: City Council and Engineering regarding Countryside H Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project Attention: City Council and Engineering regarding Countryside H.Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project From: Gary Lee, 5621 Wycliffe Road The city has determined that Countryside H neighborhood streets need full reconstruction. Because of this, now is the time to review, repair and update all our utilities under those roadways. For this reason, I have been working to communicate to the city public works & engineering departments that the storm sewer system which was designed approximately 40 years ago does not appear well- equipped to handle the frequent and heavy rains that have been occurring increasingly and are only projected to continue increasing with climate change. I'm concerned that mother nature is evolving faster than our system is. As I understand it, the city is utilizing on an older EPA definition of a 100 year rain, based on a 6" rain event, to state that under simulation the storm sewer system is capable. I believe there is a newer EPA definition either recently implemented or in process of being implemented, which uses an 8.5" rain event as an updated standard.,. I. have not yet, heard how our storm sewer system would perform under this simulation. However, whatever that theoretical. simulation suggests, the methodology still doesn't appear to consider a very wide range of possibilities. With the, nearly daily news on global climate change, I believe it's increasingly, possible that we will experience two six -inch rains over a period of.two or three weeks. It's my strong belief that in this situation the Hawkes Lake lift station would be overwhelmed and water would be going through the back doors of some homes on the lake. I believe if.the models were to simulate this scenario, they would agree with me. If we were to deem the rainfall of spring 2014 as a 100 year rain event as I've been told it was, then we will have had three 100 year rain events in that last thirty years (1987, 2002 and 2014). So my view is that we need to have a solid plan for our storm system to handle the even greater demands imposed by more frequent storms as well as larger rainfalls. The city has a responsibility to those homes it chose to put on the storm sewer system to ensure that the system evolves to keep up with changing environment. But more than that, Edina is a city that leads. Our storm sewer system is another area where I believe the city can and needs to lead. Using an old and narrow definition of what constitutes a significant rain event downplays the looming potential for flooding. I request that the city council ensure that the city has a leading -edge storm sewer system. Because this effort'needs to start somewhere and because the city has determined that the streets around Hawkes. Lake are to be reconstructed in 2015, 1 request that as part of the Countryside H Reconstruction project, updates to the pumping system on Hawkes Lake be considered to_ get water out faster, so the system will be better aligned with how quickly the Lake is and will rise during more frequent and heavier rain events. Thank -you for your consideration. I will be attending my daughter's first band concert at Countryside Elementary School during the Tuesday, December 9 meeting regarding the Countryside H Road Reconstruction Project. I will try to stop by the city council meeting afterwards to see if discussion is still going on, but if not I look forward to further discussion on this topic. Gary Lee, 5621 Wycliffe Road. 2 Joyce Repya From: Joe Lichtenberger <Joe_Lichtenberger @cargill.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8 :52'AM. To: Joyce Repya Subject: Heritage Preservation Board - 4505 Arden Attachments: 4842- 001.pdf, Arden Blueprint from- :1925 Hello Joyce, Please find two attachments that I would like sent to the HPB and members of the City Council. Please put me on copy when it is sent. The first attachment is a letter I am going to send to my neighbors regarding the Star Tribune article. It is a follow up to comments that were attributed to. me in the article, which I believe the author took out of context. The second attachment is a.photo of the original blueprints of 4504 Arden Ave. In my communication with the author I reference that the original blueprints of my home are framed and hang over the fireplace mantel. I really did frame the original blue prints and they look beautiful. It reflects poor journalism that the Star Tribune chose to not disclose that in a letter dated November 14, 2014, a member of the Heritage Preservation Board: threatened litigation against a homeowner in the Country Club neighborhood and called for the resignation of several members of the Edina planning committee. Thanks for your help and have a wonderful holiday season. Very truly yours, Joe Lichtenberger From: Joyce Repya rmailto :]Repva@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:32 PM To: Joe Lichtenberger Subject: RE: Heritage Preservation Board Hi Joe — By all means, forward your email to me and I will make sure the HPB and City Council receive it. aim .f Joyce Repya, Senior Planner 952 -826 -04621 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 4801 W. 50th St. I Edlna, MN 55424 JReavaOLdInaMN.aov I www.EdlnaMN:aov /Plannlna ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joe Lichtenberger rmailto:]oe Lichtenberger0cargill.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:00 PM To: Joyce Repya Subject: Heritage Preservation Board Hello Joyce, I just read the Star Tribune article regarding 4505 Arden Avenue. [was also quoted in the article, but am not thrilled with context used by Mr. Reinan. Therefore, I would like to forward the email I sent to Mr. Reinan to the HPB and City Council. Are the right person to speak with? Can you forward the email to right people on my behalf? Kind regards, Joseph W. Lichtenberger! 4504, Arden .Ave Edina, MN 55424 Dear Neighbor, Deceibber9j 2014 Thls note is. fol low up to the Star Tfibuhd article published-this -week regarding the demolition at 4505: Ard,en.Avenue. The author; JohnReinanj used. my ndrn6 and as well: as two comments I sent tqhim, via . qmaif, The, quotes used by the author and attributed to me were,. in my opinion, ;taken out, of context. Rather than try to c4faffi myself,. I :am sharing you my correspondence with Mr., Reinan, which, was .one; email:: You sari draw, your:.own: conclusion.. I wish you and your family a wonderful holiday season. Very truly yours, Joseph Lichtenberger Joe Lichtenberger From: Reinan, John [John. Reinan@startribune.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:02 AM To: Joe Lichtenberger Subject: RE: 4505 Arden Ave Thanks, Joe, for this very cogent note. As you probably know, IVs a general rule of life that people who are unhappy with a situation tend to make the most noise. So I'm very happy to hear from someone who has a different point of view. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts. From: Joe Lichtenberger Sent: Wednesday, Novernoer 12, 2014 10:59 AM To: Reinan, John Subject: 4505 Arden Ave Hello John, My name is Joe Lichtenberger, I am the owner of 4504 Arden Ave, directly across the street from 4505 Arden Ave. It Is my understanding your are soliciting neighbors regarding the activities at 4505 Arden Ave. For the record, I FULLY support the remodel and any activities related to the construction of a new home at 4505 Arden Ave. If the foundation was deemed unsafe, and a teardown was deemed necessary by qualified professionals, then a teardown should take place. It's a matter of safety. The prior owners at 4505 Arden lived in squalor and did not keep the home up to any reasonable standard. it should have been torn down years ago. You should also thoroughly investigate the behavior of the Heritage Preservation Board throughout this process. The HPB effectively subjected the owners of 4505 Arden to double jeopardy. After 4 years, the HPB finally approved a restoration plan by a 7 to 2 vote. One of the 2 dissenters, Joyce Mellom who Is Vice Chairman of the HPB, APPEALED its own decision. How can the HPB approve a plan, then have certain members of the HPB appeal their own decision? This required a second approval by the City Council, which they approved in a 4 to 1 vote. A second approval should have never been required unless the appeal was requested by someone who Is not on the HPB. No homeowner or taxpayer in the Country Club neighborhood should be subject to this treatment by both the city and their neighbors. As I am sure your Investigation has found, Joyce Mellom also lives across the property in question. Further, I know you will find several neighbors on Arden that also support the activities at 4505 Arden Ave. If you choose to write a story, good journalism will both cast light on the HPB's behavior and highlight that many neighbors support the plan at 4505 Arden Ave. Finally, I fully support the mission of the HPB. I don't want McMansions or contemporary style homes in the Country Club neighborhood. In my home, I framed the original blueprints from 1925 and put them over my fireplace mantel. I love the neighborhood. But homeowners have rights too, and a vocal minority with excessive power needs to be kept In check. I will not comment further on this matter and ask that you respect my privacy by not contacting me or coming onto my property. Very truly yours, Joe Lichtenberger .-4w i. L- I 4i I -VI Heather Branigin From: Jason Urbanski <urbys @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:52 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Countryside H Roadway Reconstruction, - Attn: City - Council and Engineering December 9, 2014 My name is Molly Urbanski and I reside at 5800 Stuart Avenue. I am writing in regard to the proposed road improvement No. BA -413, Countryside H neighborhood roadway construction. I will be in attendance at this evening's meeting where I will,be asking the following questions and wanted.to get them to you prior so that you could be aware of them. - The preliminary assessments for our area (9/24/2014) were between $8,600.00 - $10,900.00. Why is there such a huge jump to the $11,732.00? - In regard to the payments that are divided over a fifteen year period with interest — are we as home owners allowed to deduct the interest on our taxes? - On page 9 of the Engineering study under Traffic and Crash Data - it indicates that "City staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at four locations within or near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes ranged from 300 to 364 cars per day with 85th percentile speeds ranging from 22.2 to 25.5 mph." Location Description Year Average Daily Traffic 85th Speed, mph 1 Arbour Avenue 2014 339 22.2 2 Benton Avenue 2005 300 - 3 Grove Street 2014 821 31.4 4 Grove Street 12014 1 364 25.5 The information is misrepresented as well as misleading - 1.) On your Traffic and Crash Data table located under Appendix G (see above) it indicates that the speeds and volume actually range from 300 to 821 cars per day and speeds ranging from 22.2 to 31.4 mph. 2.) The #4 study was located 1 house in off of Olinger onto Grove. This location would not give an accurate representation of the speed at which cars travel down Grove as these cars would just be entering Grove and accelerating or would be slowing for the stop sign located at the corner of Olinger and Grove. 3.) The #3 area monitored in 2005 was off of Tracy onto Grove where the majority of traffic comes from Tracy Ave. onto Grove Street - 821 cars with an average speed of 31.4 miles per hour. This includes the traffic of the residents but a good part of this traffic is to and from Good Samaritan Church for services, events and pre - school classes that are held there daily,"'as well as the school buses and parent traffic that uses this route to enter and exit Countryside Elementary School. When using this route to enter and exit Countryside Elementary School both school buses and parent traffic turn off of Grove Street onto Stuart and continue to the parking lot located at the school. In order to make an informed decision in regard to the roadways located in this particular area I would propose a road study off of Tracy onto Grove, Stuart and on Benton Avenue to get a true representation as to the traffic in our particular area. - On page 11 -12 of the Engineering study under Proposed Improvements: Streets - it indicates that "the reconstructed gravel and pavement sections will meet the,requirements of a minimum 20 -year design life based on projected traffic loadings. " 1.) Was this "20 year design life" based. on the average # of cars, 300 -364, or on the 300 - 821? If it was based on the, 300 -364 "vehicles, due to the daily.traffic indicated between Tracy and Grove of 821 vehicles the life would decrease dramatically,: and would actually be more like 10 yearsl 2.) Did this "20 year design life" take in to consideration the additional weight of school buses? Our roads already suffer from the additional weight of the school buses which cause our streets to break down faster — especially by the manhole covers, gutters and curb areas. - On page 11 -12 of the Engineering study under Proposed Improvements: Streets — it also indicates that "It is anticipated that as part of the next street reconstruction project for this area, the utility systems will have reached the end of their service lives, thereby requiring extensive rehabilitation'." 1.) When is the "next street construction project" for the Living Streets Policy proposed? I do not want to pay $12,000 to have another assessment in a few years on top of this one! - On page 14 of the Engineering study under Proposed Improvements: Sidewalks — it indicates that "Staff will continue to study traffic volumes and speeds along Arbour Avenue and Grove Street to determine if traffic calming measures are warranted as part of a future project." 1.) How does the city plan on monitoring the traffic volumes and speeds? How often is the city planning on studying these issues? We have had and continue to have issues with additional traffic on the route between Tracy Avenue to Grove Street and from Grove Street down Stuart Avenue. Not only do these roadways sustain 800+ cars but we have the additional Issues of buses and cars running the stop signs located on the corners of Grove and Stuart, accelerated speeds, and parking issues when there are activities at the school. Although the Police Department and the city have been notified of these issues and have sent officers out to.monitor the traffic they have done little to improve the situation. (I have video tape of cars and buses running the stop sign while the officer remains in his unmarked police car doing nothing to assist or to curtail the issues.) The study conducted in 2005 was due to the addition proposed at Good Samaritan. Church and the neighborhood concerns as to the issues of traffic, parking and such. When .I received the study results and saw the numbers I contacted the city with my concern— I was'told that those are average numbers and speeds throughout Edina neighborhoods and that.there was nothing that concerned them in regard to the study. We are a neighborhood'not a freeway or a racetrack- yet,these issues have not warranted the city's concern in the past and I am afraid that it most likely will not warrant your concern in the future either. Thank you for your time and I look forward to your answers at the meeting this evening. Sincerely yours, Molly Urbanski Heather Branigin From: Carol Thompson <cthompson999 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:42 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Fwd: Loss of credibility Begin forwarded message: From: Carol Thompson <carolthompson999 a-.gmail.com> Subject: Loss of credibility Date: December 10, 2014 at 9:28:45 AM CST To: irepya(@-EdinaMN.aov Cc: jameshovlandCa�ci.edina.mn.us Dear Joyce, I was terribly disappointed this morning to read your quote in the Strib saying that the foundation of the Arden tear -down could not be repaired. Really? Old and historic structures across the world are repaired and preserved daily. Period. The home I purchased in the Country Club in 1982 was a complete mess but my husband and 1, over time, rehabbed the house into a very comfortable home. Trust me, it can be done. To ma y of us you come across as being squarely on the side of the developers with little interest in preservation. How many neighborhoods in Edina have Heritage Landmark Designation status? Why not work to keep the treasured historic structures in the Country Club neighborhood in tact, rather than let the area morph into just another indistinctive suburb? Carol Thompson 4523 Bruce, Edina Heather Braniain From: Lorenzo Tunesi <lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com> Sentc Wednesday, December 10, 201412:35 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina sidewalks Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council, Thank you for having voted unanimously in favor of sidewalks in Edina. Lorenzo Tunesi 4413 - Ellsworth Dr Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: Michael Ebnet <mikeebnet1 @yahoo.com> Sent Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:26 -PM To: Edina Mail Subject: council meeting etiquette Mayor Hovland, I was at the recent Council meeting that discussed the 7200 apartment complex. A young woman gave a fairly impassioned speech to which the audience clapped heartily. You'chastised the audience. I think you were wrong to do so for these reasons: 1) I didn't see the rules of decorum posted anywhere 2) the clapping provided a measure for what the audience wanted, eliminating the need for people to get up and speak themselves saving you and,-everyone else time. You certainly have the right to run your meeting the way you best see fit. But it would help if you posted the major rules for audiences. As long as I have your attention, and I hope I do have your attention, because I thought it best to email this comment to you and not to the newspapers, I would like to say something about the proposed apartments. 1) the restaurant should be a no -go. My guess is it will fail. When I was in architecture school we joked that to get a good'grade you needed to put a honker on every roof, be it home, church, library, etc. (A honker was a skylight" that directed light through a vertical window and bounced it off a 45 degree surface to light up the room below.) By adding the restaurant to 7200 France, this architect is adding today's honker. The Mill Valley restaurant may have been a good idea because there are no other restaurants within a� half mile. At 7200 France you can walk across France to Byerly's, Pin Stripes, lee Ann Chin, Five Guys, Potbelly, Big Bowl, Pittsburg Blue, etc. I see no reason to burden neighbors with truck deliveries and exhaust odors. I certainly don't see disgruntled neighbors using the restaurant. IF they want to add a destination restaurant, it would cause additional traffic stress. 2) In rega'r`d to Gretzky skating to where the puck will be. Apartments are being overbuilt in the metro area. Yes, there is a demand for them now. But the millennials will soon grow up. And want a standalone house with a yard for kids. The housing bubble and current tight mortgage rules have only delayed their exiting apartments for single - family homes. They will soon realize that a home is cheaper than an apartment (Schafer: Cheapest place to live is one that you own Dec 6 Strib). In five years, there will be a wave of millennials headed for single homes. Apartments will be dropping rents. In other words, apartments is where it's at today. Tomorrow it will be single - family housing. 3) Density is not all it's cracked up to be. I've lived where there was a lot of foot traffic. I eventually got to the point where I left my car unlocked and the glove compartment open because every few days the car was broken into. (Eventually I took out the overhead bulbs because the miscreants never bothered to close the doors.) It stands to reason that if there is one petty thief per hundred people, there will be four for four hundred. Thanks for hearing me out. Your job is not the easiest. But I think the medical building would be a better fit because traffic would come at different time, not just rush hour. Mike Ebnet 4501 Claremore Court Heather Branigin From: Marie Pechman <mariemitz @gmail.com> Sent Wednesday, December 10,.2014 5:48 PM To: ionibennetti2 @comcast.net Edina Mail; Mary.Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Jim & Stephanie,Vitt, Chad Millner Subject: Halifax Avenue.Weting Tuesday, 12/16, 10:30 a.m., 5,316 Halifax -- Street Project Discussion & Walkthrough Mayor Hovland and the members of the Edina City Council: Thank you so much for all your time & discussion at the December 9th council meeting on the Arden Park Street Project. Chad Millner has agreed to meet with Halifax Avenue homeowners on Tuesday morning, Dec. 16, from 10 :30 to 1p.m., to walk the block with residents and discuss detailsof the approved 2015 street reconstruction: We will meet at 5316 Halifax Avenue'`& walk the street. Coffee & refreshments will be served. Please join us if you can! i We Halifax residents initially have six major questions & concerns specific to reconstructing the street on Halifax Avenue: 1. The City paid its portion of the Halifax sidewalk assessment in 2009 (S -100). The pump house property, 5233 Halifax, should also be eligible for the 2015 street assessment. 2. In 2007, the City had Halifax Avenue designated as a "Business District" and as such was assessed 25% less for the 2009 sidewalk. As this precedent was set, we would like to receive the 25% reduction of our $14,400 street assessment, because of this "business district" designation. 3. Parking will be allowed on which-side of the street? School buses drop off/pick up kids on the west side of Halifax (no west sidewalks—yet). Sidewalks are on east Halifax. 4. Can we Halifax residents come up with/petition for a plan for streetlights to coordinate with the selection stated in the Arden Park project? Can we replace the current Excel streetlight? 5. Would construction projects /teardowns occurring after the street reconstruction have to replace the old water /sewer pipes to meet the street, :thereby digging the new street to connect? 6. Since our street will be narrowed from 30 feet to 24 feet, can the additional 6' curb space be added only to the west side of the street, to avoid disruption to the east sidewalk and to allow room for a possible future west sidewalk? We hope you can join us on Tuesday, but understand your busy schedules and short notice. Please consider the above notes and possible edits to the approved street plan. We are so grateful for all your hard work for our community! Happy Holidays to all of you! Marie Pechman ' 5316 Halifax Avenue.South Edina, MN 55424 (952) 926 -1446 1,01 abbeys SAFER POOLS. December 10th, 2014 nllllii' i' hilr' tihll' lul��gl�llll�li'Irrtnurulthlll' City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Friend, HOPE SAFER KIDS. 194 T1 P1 The Abbey's Hope Charitable Foundation has accomplished so much over the past year in addition to all of the progress since Abbey's passing in 2008. Our success is due, in large part, to the support from friends and stakeholders like you. This year has been a tremendous year of growth and expansion for Abbey's Hope into the national pool safety awareness community. This growth, while very exciting, has placed additional financial and administrative burdens on our foundation and could use your help. Please consider a year -end donation to Abbey's Hope so that we can continue and expand our important efforts. As you know, Abbey's hope was that no child should ever suffer like she did as the result of an improperly maintained pool. In her memory and in response to our daughter's stated wish, we established the Abbey's Hope Charitable Foundation. The Foundation works every day to make sure that all pools, both public and private, are safe. Since the Foundation's inception, it has helped the Minnesota State Legislature craft and pass the Abigail Taylor Pool and Spa Safety Act that requires all public pools in the state to be equipped with safety devices that will help to prevent entrapments and eviscerations. The Foundation also worked with the United States Congress to pass the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool & Spa Safety Act which does for the nation's public pools what the Abigail Taylor Pool & Spa Safety Act does for Minnesota. This past year, the Foundation has been particularly busy. Abbey's Hope has been featured on several national and local news media outlets on the topic of water safety and entrapment prevention. Our acclaimed radio and television public service announcements have aired Minnesota and in both Arizona and Florida and is helping to expand our messaging nationally. Abbey's Hope continued its support of the YMCA/Abbey's Hope pool safety classes with its largest grant ever. Because of our support, over 3,700 children participated In swim lessons and completed the water safety course. This summer, the Consumer Product Safety Commission again relied on Abbey's Hope to help spread the word about water safety through the federal governments' pool safety education campaign. And finally, the Foundation's contribution to safety was recognized with an invitation to join the Governing Board of the National Drowning Prevention Alliance. S021 Vernon Aue. Suite 164 www obbeyshope_org phone (612) 388.5350 e-mail info @obbegshope.org mail Edina, Minnesota 55436 Today, several years after Abbey's tragic, death, the Foundation is proud to continue to work to prevent the preventable. Abbey's hope is not only still'aliVe but, more importantly, being realized. It is worth the effort. We can't, however, do it alone, we need your support. Please consider making a year -end donation'to the Abbey's Hope Charitable Foundation. Your generous donation will help ensure that no child is injured or loses his/her life because of a preventable drowning or entrapment. Donations can be sent to: Abbey's Hope Charitable Foundation 5021 Vernon Ave, Suite 164 Edina, MN 55436 OR at www.abbeyshope.org Thank you for your time and consideration and, of course, have a great holiday season. Keep the Faith, Scott Taylor Katey Taylor Chairman & Co- Founder President & Co- Founder Abbey's Hope Charitable Foundation Abbey's Hope Charitable. Foundation scottRabbeyshope.org katey @abbeyshope.org 5021 Vernon Aue. Suite 164 www obbegshope.org phone (612) 388.5350 a -mail info @abbeyshope.org mail Edina, Minnesota 55436 f� Heather Branigin prom: Marisa White <marisanwhite @gmaiIxom> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7 :51 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Government Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi, I was just wondering if Mayor Hovland has seen my email yet? I know he is probably very busy but I'm on a tight schedule and am just wondering if I should just try to talk to someone else. Thanks, Marisa White On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Edina Mail <mail a edinamn.gov> wrote: Dear Marisa, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to Mayor Hovland. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno0EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Marisa White [ mailto :marisanwhite(-b)gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 6:32 PM 1 To: Edina Mail Subject: Government Project Hi Mr. Hovland, My name is Marisa White I am a senior at Minnehaha Academy and I live in Edina. I am currently in a class called U.S. Government and Politics. One of the requirements is to talk to a sitting official and ask dome questions by December 15th: This can either be over email or mi person which ever is most, convenient for you. My questions for you are: 1. What is the biggest challenge of being the mayor of Edina? 2. What would be the top 2 things you would like to accomplish as mayor? . 3. What do you think it means to be liberal or conservative in America today? 4. What is your opinion on the use of medical or recreational use of marijuana ? / Do you think it should, be the state's or central government's decision? 5. Do you think the two -party system is "good" for America? If you would prefer to reply to this email with the answers that would be perfect or if you could meet in person that would work too. If you could respond at your earliest convenience that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Marisa. White 2 r �CORPO' Iasi To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IX. A. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: December 16, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the Council packet has been distributed. O 1 �/ Heather Branigin From: Kathy Dahlheimer <kdahlheimer @comcast.net> e�nt:- Friday, December 12, 2014 11;14 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Two Meetings so different... Hello ... I attended the Town Hall' Meeting,on Dec. 6th and want to first thank all of you that were in attendance for your time and participation. I must say it was very well run and 1 learned a lot about many things that are happening and gained a different perspective on various topics such as Grandview... sidewalks etc. This meeting stood in stark contrast to the other meeting I attended that week on Dec. 4th on the Grandview site. I really feel that the city owes the citizens:an apology for.that meeting. This is the holiday season and everyone's time is valuable. It was advertised as a meeting to gain community input but what it 'did not say was this would 100% be on the terms of the developer and their team and no comments or questions were welcome in the only meeting prior to serious behind1he,scenes work on the project. -Mr. Neuendorf was rude to an inquiry as to whether there would be time for questions after we went to what seemed to be endless slides and pressing buttons. This was not most people's idea of "public engagement" which Mr. Neuendorf touted to all boards and commissions when advertising this meeting. Frankly he seems out of touch. I assume you have heard from many,that were in attendance. Most walked away talking among themselves as to what a waste of time it was as they could not make any comments. This is a very smart engaged community and I think this project seems to be important to many and while I fully realize that it has gone on for so long and things must move forward. I learned so much more about the thinking in the few comments at the Town Hall meeting and if explained reasonably about the funding and general concerns I think more people would maybe be thinking differently about their Kpectations for Grandview. I hope some consideration will be given to having a better engagement process than what Confluence seemed to be. conducting that evening. Thank you and wishing you all a very happy holiday season. Kathleen - Dahlheimer Heather Branigin From: Collin Nelson <collin.nelson @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 12, 20141:23 PM To:. Edina Mail Subject: Re: Concerns from a Resident - 7200 France Development *Please forward this message. to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the' Mayor and all members of the City Council Members of the Edina.City Government - Hello again, and t hank you for taking the time to read my concerns, this time with a bit of levity, because I'm sure there won't be a lack of very serious emails that you have to read in the next two weeks; particularly regardingliny neighborhood. I:attended the :city council meeting on Tuesday, and while I am glad that you all appeared to be seriously contemplating the conundrum facing youmith the two development options presented for 7200 France, I was disappointed that I sat for almost 'four •hours to watch a 'punt'.. I seem to be in the minority age group in my neighborhood, particularly those-that are concerned about civic affairs, with the exception of Ms: Chamberlain, who spoke at the. council meeting. (Wow, 'she's pretty intense, eh ?) I can't lay claim to being a lifelong Edina resident, or a 30 year resident, or even a 1, year resident; of Edina like most of the folks in my neighborhood, but I do plan on being'a resident for the next'50 years, or so, so I would like to think I have a place at the table too. After moving my family 4 times in 6 years for my job, I declared after moving into our house that my next move would be to the funeral home. Here are my concerns /thoughts that I would like to share: -As Mr. Chamberlain spoke to, the two options presented are not the only two options available for development of the site. While the idea of a residential complex is much more appealing to me than a medical office building, the sheer size and density of the proposed residential building is far to large for this location, not to mention way outside the guidelines set by this comprehensive plan that everyone is talking about. You also collectively failed to address rezoning the area for the proposed restaurant/retail at the site. -The 'unauthorized' article schtick is a load of BS - someone had to give that interview and authorize what was printed. Also, the Plan B does not fit the Comp Plan'to a T.' The site is still not zoned for retail. Also, in the. grand scheme of 'compromise' with the builder, please don't praise them for meeting the city part of the wagon its requirements just because they took off a floor and lowered the square footage. The proposed building is still a monstrocity, and far outside what is permitted. It's the classic, negotiating tactic of asking for way more than you know you'll get, and you can back down off of the starting point towards what you're actually willing to accept. -Hey everyone, I've got a great idea! Lets work to increase bike and pedestrian traffic next to the busiest surface street in town! What's the worst that could happen? Honestly though, I understand the green push and the desire to make the city more 'green.' I just don't know if this side of France is the place to do it, given how busy the street is. Also, the whole bike storage, bike repair space on the first floor of this joint is laughable. Member Sprague, if they actually put something like this in (if the project goes through), and it lasts more than a year without the space getting repurposed, you can send me your address, I will come to your home, and you can laugh in my face on your front stoop and slam the door in my face. I just don't believe it. - Member Brindle had an awesome idea to turn the structure so all of the traffic had to turn in/out on France. I had not even thought of that, and I doubt that very many people at the council meeting had either. It still didn't address the zoning /comp plan issues, but she was actively thinking about a solution to the traffic problem, and had a great idea. Kudos! -Just when I was placing Member Brindle on a pedestal, she just ask quickly brought herself down with the omments on public transportation with respect to population density-This, isn't: verbatim, but I believe the quote went something like "If we want to have mass transit come, we meed to increase the population density to support it." AHEM. I don't want to speak for the rest of my neighborhood (or Edina for that matter), but I doubt anyone wants to increase the population density so we can have more bus stops, or a lightrail, or something similar. People don't'not'-move to Edina because we don't have bus stops. This isn't a place where .everyone is a drone who would take the lightrail downtown everyday for work if it was available. People live where they want to, and deal with the necessary commute, because Edina is the destination. Ms Boisclair's comments about long commutes having a negative impact on family life is a bunch of mularkey as well. My alarm goes off at 430 in the morning so I can make a 35 mile commute out of the city every day for work. Could I live closer to work, cut down on my commute, and use that time to spend with my family? Absolutely, but I don't, because I live where I want, get to raise my kids in the best public school district in the state, and don't have to worry about my property value swinging. I'm not trying to exclude others, especially those with lower means than myself and my family, but there is a reason property values are so high - people want to live here. You don't need to sell it. -The statement that the project isn't feasible at a lower density is ridiculous. I don't know what ROI the developer (you know, the one so focused on affordable housing) is targeting, but it must be astronomical with the thought that a smaller building wouldn't be financially beneficial. If that's true, then the people who built the apts at Southdale Center must have lost a ton. -It's true, that the developer has purchased the property, and they can put up whatever they want, within the zoning confines and the comprehensive plan. But if a developer takes that approach, that they can do what they rant with their site, then they've lost all credibility with the community in their supposed efforts to work Together to develop the site. The Cornelia neighborhood isn't saying no to affordable housing, or an apartment building. They are saying no. to the giant building proposed, which is outside the limit set by the comprehensive plan, and would result in a large increase in cut - through traffic off of France and 70th. Again, thank you for taking the time to read my comments and concerns. I hope that as a community, city government, and developer (and property owner), we can find a solution to re- develop the site that is beneficial to everyone. One last thing - for the next City Council Agenda, could you please move the 7200 France topic to the top of the public forum section? Sincerely, Collin Nelson 4516 Hibiscus Ave Edina, MN 55435 c) 901/598 -0633 collin.nelsonna,gmail.com -)n Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Edina Mail <mail ,edinamn.gov> wrote: You are welcome! . .2. Have a wonderful Thanksgiving! Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 ' Ibiunno @EdinaMN.gov I :www.EdinaMN.aov •,,vim,. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Collin Nelson [ mailto :collin.nelsonCabgmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 9:13 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Concerns from a Resident - 7200 France Development Thank you Lynette On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Edina Mail <mailgedinamn.gov> wrote: Dear Collin, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members and Community Development Director Cary Teague. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax.952- 826 -0389 IbiunnoCaaEdinaMN.aov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Collin Nelson [ mailto :collin.nelson(&gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 8:41 AM 3 To: Edina Mail; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Concerns from a Resident - 7200 France Development Please forward this message to Cary Teague, the Community Development Director, the Mayor and all members of the City Council Members of the city government - I am a new resident to Edina, but am very familiar with the city and the area, with my wife having grown up here. She attended Cornelia elementary, the same school that our 2 children will attend. We bought our home as a long -term investment in a well established community where we would raise our kids and get involved in civic activities..I wanted to express some concerns and opinions I have regarding recent and upcoming decisions by the city council. -Fred Richards Golf Course closing: An unfortunate decision, but what's done is done. You can spin the election results how you want, but I firmly believe that this past election was a referendum on the choice to close The ,red without taking the time to solicit and factor in the feedback from your constituents. Mr. Sprague will not :,e on the council in the next term, and if Ms. Bennett had sought re- election, I believe her fate would have been the same. Please perceive these election results as a'shot across the bow,' and take the next two years to repair your relationship with the citizens of Edina. -7200 France Development: The current proposal by the developer is far outside the parameters of the existing Comprehensive Plan, and by no means warrants any type of variance. There are multiple reasons why there is a need to hold to the plan, which are 1. Public Works loading - building a structure this size would definitely put a drastic increase on public works as far as stormwater runoff and sanitary sewer treatment needs. Who is going to pay for any needed upgrades to the utilities? 2. Population density - For the proposed target demographics of the rental units, there would be an influx of school age children into the Cornelia school. Is the school able to handle this surge of new students? 3. Cut through traffic on Cornelia, 72nd, and West Shore - this is the issue that is most important to me. Any redevelopment of the existing structure to include housing would increase this traffic, but a building of this size and composition (offices, retail, and housing) would generate a massive increase in traffic on these residential streets. Anyone who thinks that putting the retail entrance on France, making sure residents can only exit east ,n to 72nd, or "encouraging the residents to be good neighbors" as was proposed at the city council meeting I gent to this summer, is either ignorant, stupid, or both. We chose the location of our house because it was tucked away off of main traffic thoroughfares, and would allow our kids to play in the neighborhood and perhaps walk to school without having to cross any major roadways. Now I'm not so sure. 4. Increased traffic stoppages on France Ave - This development would likely require another stoplight on France Ave, further hampering traffic flow on the street. I'm sure the. city engineering dept would love to cut-ul- their newly re -done roadway as well. 5. Qui Bono? There are three interest that stand to benefit the most from the proposed development - The developer, the contractor, and the real estate interest. The nearby community, is not among that list. There is an abundance of apartment housing available in the Cahill and Edinborough areas, and if you're looking for affordable single family homes, they're knocking them all down along W,00ddale Ave. The only reason that the developer is hammering home the moral high ground of providing 'affordable housing' to the community, is that by including affordable housing, it guarantees 20 %' of their financing. Implementing the affordable housing mandated by the MET council would be best done spread around the city - not in huge swaths. Thank you for all the time you have collectively put into serving this community, and thank you for taking the time to read my comments and concerns. I hope you heed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and city staff and turn down the proposed development, and hold the developer to the current Comp Plan requirements. Sincerely, Collin Nelson 4516 Hibiscus Ave Edina, MN 55435 c) 901/598 -0633 collin.nel sonQ=ail.com 4516 Hibiscus Ave Edina, MN 55435 c) 901/598 -0633 collin.nelson@gmail.com 4516 Hibiscus Ave Edina, MN 55435 c) 901/598 -0633 collin.nelson@p , mail.com RE: Proposed 7200 France Development 14, December 2014 My name is William Helgeson. My wife, Lydia, our son, Andrew, and I live at the corner of 72 "d street exactly one block west of France Avenue. We are the closest home to the proposed 7200 France. project with a clear view of the site. Our family is firmly opposed to the current proposal. We are seeing numerous projects in the Southdale area that have been granted variances from the comprehensive plan by the city of Edina. We have not even begun to see or feel the cumulative effort in our community of all these projects to really understand the impact of such exceptions. These larger developments are blocking our sunlight as well as congesting our views, air quality and roads. This over densification is both unappealing and ever encroaching on the lives many of us in the Cornelia neighborhood prefer. Even the current traffic conditions no longer promote a pleasant walk or drive down France Avenue. We do not want this negative trend continuing any longer. Our.corner already has increased number of turns in front of our house since cars are no longer able to turn north onto France Avenue from 72nd street. The road directly in front of our home has sustained significant damage from a variety of factors. Previously it was the entrance to the Lutheran Church of the Master and then became the equipment /construction entrance for the Sunrise Assisted Living project. The significant damage created was never repaired. These areas have eroded even more quickly with the increased traffic. Equipment for France Avenue projects have parked in front of our home overnight and a steady use of Lynmar Lane for-funeral chapel traffic and parking. The inevitable turnarounds in our now damaged driveway make the situation worse. No matter how a developer chooses to disguise it, this traffic situation will certainly get worse. We will be left with congestion we never bargained for, road damage inflicted and ignored by others, and a financial responsibility that should be appropriately allocated elsewhere. In brief, the proposed 7200 France development was soundly voted down by the planning commission, requires large deviations from the comprehensive plan, and does not have support from the affected Cornelia community. Each of these 3 items on their own should be enough to vote against approval of this project. Cumulatively it would be a travesty to allow this project to proceed. The pendulum of increased density has been set in motion by other projects. It is not responsible to increase the uncertainty of this course by carelessly adding to its momentum. We at 7128 Lynmar Lane do not want to be an aesthetic, environmental or traffic experiment for this excessive project. We are too close to avoid the consequences. Please cast your vote against approval of the 7200 France proposal. Respectfully, William Helgeson Lydia Helgeson Andrew Helgeson Deb Mangen From: Sheriff Stanek <Sheriff.Stanek @hennepin.us> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:46 PM ibject: Important update: Henn Co Sheriff's Office 911 To municipal leaders., On December 16, the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office will transition 911 dispatch services from our former facility in Golden Valley — to our new facility in Plymouth, MN. This milestone marks the completion of our state -of- the -art facility, the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office 9,11 Communications. Facility (911 -ECF). The 911 -ECF is one of the largest consolidated dispatch centers in the Upper Midwest, handling approximately 600,000 telephone calls annually in 37 communities. The facility benefits emergency communications . hroughout Minnesota -- because it offers shared technology services and provides backbone technology for public safety answering points in communities throughout a large region of the state. When dispatch services begin at the new 911 -ECF on December 1 6, the transition ims expected to be seamless. In fact, the new facility will allow 'us to offer many enhanced communications services both now - and in the future - -when Next - Generation 911 becomes a reality. I am asking for your help to share new telephone numbers for the new 911 facility. This is especially important to cities that receive our dispatch services. Scroll to the bottom of this email and forward the information below to your personnel to update directories, as appropriate. If you have any questions about the transition, feel free to contact Captain Jim Bayer at the Communications Division at 612- 596 -1908 dames. bayer(a-) hen nepin.us). 1 Thank you for your continued partnership in public safety, Rich Richard W. Stanek Hennepin County Sheriff * This number is important to cities that receive dispatch services from the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office. Our new public, non - emergency telephone number, 952 725B. 5321 , will replace all of the numbers listed below. Please eliminate listings of the Golden Valley public, non - emergency numbers which included the following: General: 763- 525 -6216 East Main: 763- 525 -6215 South Main: 763- 525 -6210 North Main: 763- 525 -6220 * Many cities and police departments have recorded messages that ask residents to reach them "after hours" by calling 763- 525 -6216, or 763 -525- 6215, or 763- 525 -6210, or 763- 525 -6220. Be sure to change those recorded messages so that residents are now asked to call only 952 -258- 5321: * If residents are confused about what phone number to call, they may call 911, even for non - emergency purposes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMERGENCY PERSONNEL or.OFFIQIALS ONLY Dispatch Sergeant: 952 - 258 -5330 (Old number: 763 - 525 -6228) 2 * If you or other officials need immediate service, please contact the Dispatch Sergeant. After. December 16, our old phone numbers will still work -- because calls will be,forwarded to the new facility for several months. Additional notification will be sent to you when the Golden Valley phone numbers will no longer be operational. Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney- client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure. of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 3 - Deb Manaen From: Knutson, Katie (CI'StPaul) <katie.knutson @ci.stpaul.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:55 PM To: Knutson, Katie (CI- StPaul) Cc: Finn, Anne; Todd Olson; Amanda C Duerr Subject:. 846/o One Page Document Attachments: The Importance of Funding City Streets .pdf Mayors, Thank you again for your participation in the 84% Coalition meetings. Attached you will find the one page document we discussed putting together at our final meeting. You also requested a "principals" document that we are still developing. Our hope is that you will use this document as you meet with your local legislators and chambers of commerce to highlight the needs of city streets. Please let us know any feedback you receive from your conversations as it will greatly inform our strategy for moving forward. To keep you up to date on the outreach we've conducted, Mayor Coleman recently spoke in front of the Move MN executive committee stressing'the importance of including city streets in their 2015 legislative proposal and he will speak in front of the League of MN Cities Board next week. Staff met with the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce legislative team and will present in January in front of their transportation committee. The Coalition of Greater MN Cities and the City of Saint Paul traveled to Red Wing and had a strong initial meeting with the new transportation chair, Representative Kelly. The League, Metro Cities, the Coalition of Greater MN Cities are currently scheduling meetings with the other Legislative leaders and the Governor. As always any comments, questions or concerns please don't hesitate to reach out. Best, Katie Katie Knutson Government Relations Associate Office of Mayor Christopher B. Coleman 15 West Kellogg Blvd, Suite 390 Saint Paul, MN 55102 P:651- 266 -8519 katie.knutson(@ci.stpaul.mn.us "ran Ftrest L you 44w. .. Making Saint Paul the Most- Livable City in America 1 84% of city streets are funded solely The Importance of Funding City Streets by property taxes and special assessments. • The last mile of almost every trip traveled is on a city street. Current funding streams leave 706 cities with no state funding for their roads. • The Transportation Finance Advisory Committee determined $400 million /year in additional funding is needed to bring city streets up to an economically competitive standard. Getting to $400 Million Sales tax options: 0 Wcent statewide new sales tax - $175 M o Dedicating current tax on auto parts - $174,M o Dedicating the newly - collected Amazon sales tax - $10 M 0 6.5% sales tax on gas (increased funding MSA cities) - $37 M Bonding The Local Road Improvement Program was established to help fill the gap between the HUTDF and the needs of local roads. Recommendation to fund this program at $200 million. "Clearly, the state -aid accounts do not have sufficient funding to meet all of the preservation and expansion needs of the state -aid systems at existing funding levels." "...an increase in contributions to the HUTDF would be beneficial to the local road system. But there is no realistic increase that could resolve all of the special funding requests, and as such, the problem cannot be solved by an increase to the HUTDF alone." - Legislative Study of State Funding for Local Road Improvements January2002 - The Local Bridge Program Recommendation to fund this program at $200 million. Local Tools Street Improvement Districts. Authorizing cities to collect fees over time will help better plan and fund street repairs. Cost Participation Policies. If MnDOT receives additional funds through the HUTDF, cost participation policies should be improved to allow more local funds to be spent on the local city street system. (ie expand MnDOT's participation in Complete Streets projects) Deb Mangen From: Eugene Persha <epersha @aol.com> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 8:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject. 7200 France Avenue Development Members of the Edina City Council: At the last Council meeting, City Planner, Cary Teague, was asked to enter in discussion /negotiation with Hennepin County Transportation about the possibility of curb cuts for entrance /exits for the proposed building on 7200 France Ave... Hennepin County. Transportation did not change its view or objections to the France Ave. entrance /exits. Instead, as I understand it, in concert with the city, Hennepin County Transportation offered a number of alternatives to solve the potential traffic problems that would be caused on 72nd'St. It is important to note that both the city staff and the Planning Commission turned down this project because of the major changes asked for. Now, city staff is recommending one of the alternatives to restrict traffic on 72nd St. with closing part of it by a barrier or cul -de -sac. The residents in the greater Cornelia area were not informed, consulted, or asked to comment. This is not only an unbalanced approach, but it is downright inequitable to the neighborhood. It seems, that one building has greater influence than do the hundreds of residents who live in this area and use this street. Who is advocating-for whom here? I personally reject closing.this street for any reason ,since it would create more problems than it would solve: Hundreds of residents in this area use 72nd St. as their major in and out going east and west in the Cornelia neighborhood. This idea if it even warrants further discussion, needs to be sent back to the Planning Commission for a serious look at traffic impacts and resident views. Thus, it requires at the least, another public hearing. This is too great of an issue to be decided in a very cursory manner. One thing I learned in all my study of carrying capacity on land is that the first principle is.what the land. or area will support without adding deterioration. Secondly, can the area be sustained without a degradation of the existing conditions and use in a given area? Third, carrying capacity also takes strong note of the cultural and social conditions of a given area. Something new or im- posed on a land area cannot by its own nature trump what the land once was, or for what its use is. Note well: carrying capacity in the vein presented, involves social change, and the proposed change does not have right to trump past use in a social(residential) environment. In other words, one factor easily affects multiple factors with no single one cancelling others out on presumed higher value. This whole area is much greater than one single part, and it needs to be treated that way so there is a total vision not just a single component vision within an enlarged area. I strongly recommend a good second look at this entire proposal. Gene'Persha Cornelia Neighborhood Resident 1 Deb Manuen From: William Helgeson <williesspeedshop @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 9:12 PM Edina Mail beet]ebug00 @gmaiI.com Subject: ATTN: Mayor James Hovland Urgent, please review before Tuesday's city council meeting. 7200_france_helgeson.pdf . 1 RE: Proposed 7200 France Development 14, December 2014 My name is William Helgeson. My wife, Lydia, our son, Andrew, and I live at the corner of 72nd street exactly one block west of France Avenue. We are the closest home to the proposed 7200 France.project with a clear view of the site. Our family is firmly opposed to the current proposal. We are seeing numerous projects in the Southdale area that have been granted variances from the comprehensive plan by the city of Edina. We have not even begun to see or feel the cumulative effort in our community of all these projects to really understand the impact of such exceptions. These larger, developments are blocking our sunlight as well as congesting our views, air quality and roads. This over densification 'is both unappealing and ever encroaching on the lives many of us in the Cornelia neighborhood prefer. Even the current traffic conditions no longer promote a pleasant walk or drive down France Avenue. We do not want this negative trend continuing any longer. Our corner already has increased number of turns in front of our house since cars are no longer able to turn north onto France Avenue from 72nd street. The road directly in front of our home has sustained significant damage from a variety of factors. Previously it was the entrance to the Lutheran Church of the Master and then became the equipment /construction entrance for the Sunrise Assisted Living project. The significant damage created was never repaired. These areas have eroded even more quickly with the increased traffic. Equipment for France. Avenue projects have parked in front of our home overnight and a steady use of Lynmar Lane for funeral chapel traffic and parking. The inevitable turnarounds in our now damaged driveway make the situation worse. No matter how a developer chooses to disguise it, this traffic situation will certainly get worse. We will be left with congestion we never bargained for, road damage inflicted and ignored by others, and a financial responsibility that should be appropriately allocated elsewhere. In brief, the proposed 7200 France development was soundly voted down by the planning commission, requires large deviations from the. comprehensive plan, and does not have support from the affected Cornelia community. Each of these 3 items on their own should be enough to vote against approval of this project. Cumulatively it would be a travesty to allow this project to proceed. The pendulum of increased density has been set in motion by other projects. It is not responsible to increase the uncertainty of this course by carelessly adding to,its momentum. We at 7128'Lynmar Lane do not want to be an aesthetic, environmental or traffic expeeiment'for this excessive project. We are too close to avoid the. consequences. Please cast your vote against approval of the 7200 France proposal. Respectfully, William Helgeson Lydia Helgeson Andrew Helgeson Deb Mangen From: Suzanne Kerwin <skerwin @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 9:32 AM r - Edina Mail ,ubject: LWVE January Meetings: Homeless Youth in the Suburbs Please send to the City Council and members of Boards and Commissions, Thank you! Homeless Youth in the Suburbs Thursday, January 8th Andrea Knoll, Oasis for Youth 9:30- 11:30am, Edina Senior Center Oasis for Youth is a small community based nonprofit organization poised to help the growing population of homeless and precariously housed youth, 16 to 21 years of age, in Bloomington, Richfield and Edina. Andrea Knoll, Vice - President of Oasis for Youth, will share the history of Oasis for Youth, how the center ',perates and stories of some of the clients Oasis has helped. Saturday, January 10th Ann Mavity, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative 9:30- 11:30am, Edina City Hall Community Room Beacon partners with congregations in the Twin Cities metropolitan area to end homelessness through housing, shelter and public advocacy. Beacon has recently purchased land in Edina for 66 West Apartments, proposed supportive housing for homeless southwest suburban youth. Ann Mavity, Director of New Projects for Beacon, will discuss the 66 West project, its goals and the current work being done on the project. The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non - partisan political organization that encourages *he informed and active participation in government, and influences public policy through ;ducation and advocacy. For more information, please visit www.lwvedina.orq. Deb Mangen From: Santoso, Stephanie < Stephanie- M_Santoso @ostp.eop.gov> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:03 AM Subject: Maker Cities Call- Tues. Dec. 16th @ 1 p.m. EST Hello all, Thank you for your participation or interest in the Mayor's Maker Challenge. This Tues. Dec. 16`h from 14 p.m. EST. White House OSTP, along with several key organizations are hosting a call to discuss follow up and discuss next steps from the White House Maker Faire. We'd like to hear about what's happening in your. cities around making and how you've been implementing any commitments you made to create more opportunities for making which enable hands -on STEM learning, facilitate entrepreneurship and expand manufacturing in your city. In addition, we'd like to identify areas where your community might need resources or support and connect you to organizations or individuals that could be of assistance. This will also be an opportunity for communities to learn from each other. In preparation for tomorrow's call, please find the call -in information below. Please note that you'll need to pre- register in order to participate in the call using the following URL: Participants may preregister for this teleconference at: http: / /ems6.intellor.com ?p= 600448 &do = register &t =1 Once the participant registers, a confirmation page will display dial -in numbers and a unique PIN, and the participant will also receive an email confirmation of this information. During the call, we'll ask you to share what has been taking place in your city around making. Given that there are many folks on the call, we'll ask you to keep these updates to 2 -3 minutes. We'd also like to collect some updates about what cities have been doing as a follow up from signing on to the Mayor's Maker Challenge so that the White House can highlight these in different ways. And if your community hasn't signed on to the Mayor's Maker Challenge but has, been taking steps to support making locally, we'd like to hear about it. If you could please email me a brief paragraph at ssantoso @ostp.eop.gov about what your community has been doing by COB today, that would be wonderful. We look forward to speaking with you tomorrow! Stephanie Santoso Senior Advisor for Making White House Office of Science and Technology Policy ssantoso@ostp.eop.gov Deb Manaen From: USCM/Tom Cochran < actionalert= usmayors .org @mail88.atlll.rsgsv.net> on behalf of USCM/Tom Cochran <actionalert@usmayors.org> +nt Monday, December 15, 2014 11:10 AM o: Edina Mail Subject: The December 15, 2014 edition of U.S.Mayor TO: The Mayor E NI'TIED STATES CONFERMCF. OF MAYORS 1610 EYE STREE_ r. NORTH1'VFST Wa15H1:' (JON.1 - +..f: 2000r FAX "021 293.2352 URL wwti+rwsmay"mar& FROM: 'Tom Cochran, CEO and Executive Director The December 15, 2014 edition of U.S.Mayor is now available at: U.S.Mayor - Vol. 81, Issue 17 - December 15, 2014 Inside you will find: • Johnson Appoints Gary Mayor Freeman - Wilson to Lead Special Mayors- Police Chiefs Working Group • Mayors' Hunger and Homelessness Report: Increased Demand Found for Emergency Services, Shortfall in Resources • EPA Water Affordability Framework "Good First Step" • Cornett Lobbies for Marketplace Fairness Act • Nutter Named Governing Public Official of the Year • City Priorities Mostly Level - Funded in Omnibus Bill .and so much more! 1 The United States Conference of Mayors 1620 I St., N.W. 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Acid us xo tour address book unsubscribe from this list I update subscription preferences I update vour contact information Deb Manaen From: Nancy Maiers <nlmaiers @mcg.net> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 1:07 PM Edina Mail ;ubject: Webber Woods Mr. Hovland I firmly believe that this property should remain park land and that the City of Edina should make an offer that will allow it to acquire this property. .71�ancy Maiers F, one: 952-920-5206 .'maid nlmaiersCvmgg. net 1 Deb Manaen From: Karen'Chrlstensson <karen.christensson @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 1:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina City Council Dear Esteemed Council Members, I am writing you to,ask you to agree to purchase the Weber Woods from the city if Minneapolis. Please find a way to obtain this property: and•preserve.it for our Morningside residents who seek and enjoy the green space in a neighborhood where our homes are tightly knit together. My husband and I and now two grown children have lived "on the woods" in two separate locations. Twelve years on Inglewood Ave. So. and now 16 years on Alden Drive. The woods has buffered us from France Ave. noise and provided a nearby place to walk in the'nature whenever we want. I have been know to collect sticks and leaves and pods from those woods. In the winter we cross - country ski and snowshoe in the woods. It has been a'quiet, serene place right in the middle of city life. We have always felt so lucky for those woods. Please do your best to save the woods for the next generations of families who choose to live in this little pocket of paradise as I have often told people when I tell them where I live. Sincerely, Karen Christensson 4208 Alden Drive Edina, MN 55416 1 Deb Manaen From: Robert Kearney <kearney3845 @msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 1:16 PM ); Edina Mail subject: Weber Woods Dear Mayor Holland and Council Members: I am writing to urge you to acquire the wooded land north of 40th Street and west of France Avenue, commonly called Weber Woods. This land is a rare treasure: a large, undeveloped parcel in a densely populated area. Acquisition of the land could help allay current problems with our city's stormwater management, and it will help balance the pronounced inequities in our park land. (NE Edina has a quarter of the city's population and just 9 percent of its green space.) As I'm sure you know, this land is much loved by residents as a dog park and mountain bike destination. More important, it is an opportunity for our suburban children to explore and play in an unstructured environment. Organized athletics are valuable, certainly, but children (and adults) still need natural spaces. Sincerely, Robert Kearney 4226 Grimes Ave. So. 1 Deb. Manaen From: geo.bas @census.gov Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 3:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: BA52015 Annual Response 12700018188 December 15, 2014 12700018188 Edina city The Honorable James Hovland Mayor 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 -1330 FROM THE DIRECTOR' U.S. CENSUS BUREAU This is a-courtesy copy to the Highest Elected Official (HEO)/Tribal Chair (TC). Please verify that the BAS contact has responded to the survey. The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS) to update our records regarding changes to legal boundaries, names, and governmental status of all governmental units effective on or before January 1 of the survey year. This voluntary survey is an important opportunity for you to ensure that we have the correct boundary and legal name for your government. The Census Bureau will use the boundary information you provide to report data from the Population Estimates Program (PEP), the American Community Survey (ACS), and other Census programs and surveys. The 2015 BAS will only have digital materials available for download and update. The Census Bureau is not creating paper maps or shipping materials to reduce the cost of BAS. This reduction is in lieu of suspending BAS for a second consecutive year. The Census Bureau asks that you: 1. Review your boundary using any of the following options: a. Use the Census Bureau's online viewer TIGERWeb hltp: / /ti eg rweb.geo.census.gov/ TIGERWeb Instructions http• / /www census gov /geo/ partnerships /pdfs/bas/TIGERwebforBAS.pdf GEOID for TIGERWeb: 2718188 b. Download shapefiles from http•//www census.g_ov /geopartrierships/bas /bas download.html and view them in your own geographic information systems software (GIS). c. Use the Census Bureau'.s MAF /TIGER Partnership Software (MTPS) tool http:Hwww census .gov /geo/partnerships/bas/bas mtps.html. The software is designed for both novice and expert` GIS users.,,, 1 2. Respond to the survey: a. online htt-o://www.census. gov/geo/partnerships/bas/bas ar form.html -b. by e -mail to eg o.bas@census.gov c. by using the toll -free number, 1- 800 - 972 -5651 to indicate whether your governmental unit has boundary changes to report or contact updates. Refer to the BAS Web site for submission methods. The BAS Annual Response information has recently been sent to this BAS contact: Ms. Joyce Repya Associate Planner Planning 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 -1330 9527826 -0462 952- 826 -0389 jrep a@edinaMN.gov This is a courtesy copy to the Highest Elected Official (HEO) /Tribal Chair (TC). Please verify that the BAS contact has responded to the survey. Submit contact changes via e-mail to eg o.bas@census.gov or submit online ittp• / /www census ovg /geo /partnerships/bas/bas ar form.html. Your direct link to your entity information is http://www.census.g6v/g6o/partnershipsibas[basforms/st27 mn/Edina city 12700018188 BAS 15AR.pdf (username = bas, password = basforms) If your governmental unit has boundary changes to report, please submit them to the Census Bureau by March 1. All-annexations received by March 1 will be included in this year's boundary delivery for the PEP and the ACS. All annexation and boundary corrections received by May 31 will be included in BAS materials for next year. The Census Bureau will attempt to include street and landmark updates as resources permit. Please note that your response to the BAS does not replace any state or county reporting requirements. Please visit htt-o://www.census.gov /geo/Sartnerships/bas/bas state requirements.html for state reporting requirements. BAS Respondent Guides, forms, and shapefiles are available for download from the Census Web site http://www.census.gov/geo/partnerships/bas.html. The Census Bureau appreciates your response to this important voluntary survey. If you need any assistance with this request, please a -mail eg o.basgcensus.gov, telephone 1- 800 - 972 -5651, or visit litti)://www.census.gov/geo/partnerships/bas.htmi. Thank you. Deb Mangen From: Frank Bacon <frankannliv @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Weber Woods It is essential to acquire the Weber Woods, even at a high price. It is a jewel that will find much use for a long time to come. The specific uses can be ironed out later, but we must get it while,we can. Yours truly, Frank Bacon, 4217 Crocker Ave. 1 Deb Mangen From: Cora Ellenson -Myers <cora @environmentminnesota.org> Sent: Monday, December, 15, 2614 4:34 PM r . Edina Mail abject: Reminder. Environment Minnesota Clean Water Letter Attachments: MN elected officials letter.docx Dear Mayor Hovland, This is Cora Ellenson -Myers from Environment Minnesota, writing again with a reminder to review our letter to Senator Franken in support of clean water this week. We are building up support for the EPA's proposed clean water rule, which would restore Clean Water Act protections to thousands of streams and wetlands in Minnesota and across the country. We have already seen attempts this fall and in the recent Cromnibus- spending bill to roll back this proposal by polluting interests in Congress, so we are calling on Senator Franken to stand up for the waterways Minnesotans love and depend on by defending the clean water rule in the Senate. Your support is important to making sure the streams that influence the drinking water for over 970,000 Minnesotans are protected. I've copied below my previous email and attached a copy of the letter. Please let me know if you are able to sign on by this Friday December 19th, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have questions. Thank you, ora Ellenson -Myers Environment Minnesota 612 - 379 -1475 My name is Cora Ellenson- Myers; I'm the Campaign. Organizer with Environment Minnesota working on clean water. I'm writing with an update on the EPA's proposed clean water rule, and to see if you can sign on to a letter supporting clean water to Senator Franken. As I'm sure you know, right now the EPA is considering moving forward with a rulemaking to close loopholes in the Clean Water Act. These loopholes have resulted in a costly and inefficient process of case by case. evaluation to determine if individual water bodies are protected by the Clean Water Act, and have called into question the protections of 47000 miles of Minnesota's streams, and 2 million miles across the country. This is a big priority for Environment Minnesota — it could be the biggest victory for clean water in more than a decade. As you might guess, the polluters who created these loopholes have gotten their allies in Congress to attack the proposal at every turn. This fall, they passed a bill in the House to strip the EPA's authority to make the rule, and similar attacks could come up in the Senate in the coming weeks. 1 Fortunately, Senator Franken has historically been an ally for clean water, but is getting a lot of pressure from the opposition. If we're going to get these protections over the finish line, we'll need as much support as we can get from Senator Franken. Environment Minnesota is circulating a letter from elected officials urging the senator to be a champion for Minnesota lakes and waterways across the state, and we would love for you to add your name. Can you review the attached letter and let me know if�you can sign on by December 19th? If we show a big wave of support from elected officials across the state, we can make sure Sen. Franken keeps standing up for our waterways. Sincerely, Cora Ellenson -Myers Clean Water Campaign Organizer Environment Minnesota 0: (612) 379 -1475 C: (218) 341 -8045 2 The Honorable Senator Franken 60 East Plato Blvd Suite 220 Saint Paul, MN 55107 Dear Senator Franken, As elected officials across Minnesota, we write you to urge you to declare your support for the Clean Water Rule proposed by U.S. EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers to restore Clean Water Act protection to thousands of waterways here in Minnesota and across the country. As elected officials, we know how critically important clean water is to the health and economic livelihood of people across our state. Our constituents need clean water for drinking, fishing, swimming, agriculture, recreation, and the wellbeing of their communities. Waterways like the Mississippi River and Lake Superior are part of -what make Minnesota beautiful, thriving, and prosperous. But our waters' health is threatened. Beginning in 1972, the Clean Water Act protected all of the nation's waters, from small, unnamed streams to the cherished Mississippi. But now, because of two bitterly- divided Supreme Court decisions (SWANCC in 2001 and Rapanos in 2006), many of our waterways are not guaranteed protection from pollution, including the streams that feed our lakes and rivers, and wetlands that help keep them clean. Here in Minnesota, the threat is serious. Until this loophole is closed, 51 percent of our state's streams lack clear protection of our nation's bedrock environmental law. According to EPA data, these waters help provide drinking water to over 970,000 Minnesotans'. To protect our treasured 10,000 lakes, we urge you to take a public stand in support of the proposed rule to restore critical protections to these.waters under the Clean Water Act. By restoring Clean Water Act protections we can put all of Minnesota's waters back on track to becoming safe for swimming, fishing, and drinking. We appreciate your commitment to protecting Minnesota's waterways, and we hope you will move quickly to ensure they are protected for years to come. Sincerely, 1http://water.6pa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetiands/­upload/2009 12 25 wetlands science surface drin king water surface drinking water mn.pdf j ,v hJ �l vU It "'Do�4 u A,( Lr �� 14� Deb Manaen From: Clarice Hallberg <challberg @jtmega.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:49 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Webber Woods Hello, I'm a resident at 4224 Grimes Ave South in Morningside. My husband and I have lived in our house for 14 years. We love having Webber Park at the end of our block. The park and the additional green space has been a special place for all of the neighbor families. I would support the City of Edina in the purchase of the land. It is way to valuable to be turned over to a developer. We need save what little green space is left in the city. Clarice Hallberg clarice hallberg : vice president management supervisor : 952.929.1370 :it mega 1 Deb Mangen From: Ed Mathie <emathie @designcue.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:33 PM Edina Mail ubject: Edina City Council - Weber Woods We Want Weber Woods. We are quickly coming down to the moment of truth on Weber Woods, and people are watching. It doesn't seem like this should be a difficult decision given the guidance in the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 9- 18,19), the seemingly reasonable price of 1 -1.5 M, and the essentially unanimous resident feedback — that the woods need to be preserved. At the same time, it somehow feels like there are other agenda at play. Perhaps it's just the need to keep cards close in the negotiation, or the not -so- veiled pissing match with the City of Minneapolis. Let's hope it's not the rumored preference of the city to develop the site. In any case, I'd urge you to make the right choice. Buy the land — even if it means writing a check to Minneapolis when they don't deserve one. Push to keep the woods an open parkland space. Represent the city plan and the residents in this corner of -Edina that currently has fewer parks.per capita than it deserves. - Ignore the siren song of developers who would build 'premier golf residences' in the middle of Braemar Golf Course if we let them. .Ve Want Weber Woods, the choice is an easy one, and people are watching. Sincerely, Ed Mathie 4239 Grimes Deb Mangen... From: Molly Portz <molly.portz @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 8:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Vote no to 72nd and France rezone Dear Mayor, I am a resident living at 72nd and- Wooddale Avenue S, just blocks away from the proposed 72nd and France site that is be considered for rezoning to include commercial andi residential use. What is being considered is bad for the neighborhood, in opposition to the recommendation of the planning committee and a departure from the comprehensive plan. So I ask you, what and who is this for? It's certainly not for the people who live in the neighborhood. I ask you to vote to stay within the parameters of the comprehensive plan. Best regards, Molly Portz 7212 Wooddale Avenue S 1 Deb Mangen From: Amy Keepper <amykeepper @yahoo.com> gent: Monday, December 15, 2014 9:21 PM Edina Mail .jbject: Weber Woods - a personal plea Dear Kevin Staunton and Bob Stewart, I'm writing in regards to the area known as Weber Woods. Our family has enjoyed this undeveloped space for over 15 years, and we would be heartsick if it were sold for commercial development. We believe this unique sanctuary enriches the lives of the entire community far more as a park than it possibly could as a housing development. Parks are what make our communities strong. Our personal story Weber Woods is, simply put, a gem. Having lived in the Morningside area of Edina for many years, Weber Woods was a frequent destination of our family walks. As we strolled down our block towards the park, we stopped to chat and connect with our neighbors. Once there, our two dogs - Tasha and Marley - loved to socialize with their four - legged friends and sniff all that nature loves to offer: We enjoyed all the seasons there - from the lush greens of summer to colorful sumac in the Fall and the pristine beauty of winter. We developed friendships that have lasted over the years. Our two kids had an equal amount of fun, too - running along the paths and playing in tree forts. We entered on the Edina side: and emerged on the St. Louis Park side, continuing our adventure by stopping to play on ',e swing sets before we returned home. We moved away from Morningside a few years, but Weber Woods is still a favorite destination - a place that has stayed in our hearts. Whenever we visit, it feels like coming home. We love living here in Minnesota, and we are fortunate to have such a robust park system.to enjoy. But Weber Woods is.different - and even more special - in that it allows us the rare opportunity to escape from the stresses of daily life in such a simple yet profound way, merely steps from where we live. The value that Weber Woods provides goes beyond the financial - it is something more fundamental, a community hub, a connection to nature, something that truly feeds our souls. Please help us keep its magic and spirit alive. Thank you, Amy (and David, Zoey, Lucy and Marley the dog) Deb Manaen From: oconnellgang @comcast.net Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:05 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cary . Teague Subject: Fwd: 7200 France Project Mayor and City Council members, have not heard back from anyone other than Ann on this email. I understand the city council meeting tomorrow night does not have a public input section. In light of these two facts, could the city council address my questions in.their deliberations when this topic is discussed tomorrow night? That would be efficient and greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tom O'Connell From: oconnellgang @comcast.net To: Mail @EdinaMN.gov Cc: cteague @EdinaMN.gov Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 11:36:08 PM Subject: 7200, France Project Mayor and City Council members, I am a resident in the Cornelia neighborhood and have concerns a questions about the proposed redevelopment of 7200 France Ave. Questions: 1) If the county doesn't approve the access to the property off of France, how would.each member of the Council vote on this project ?. In otherwords, would you approve this project with access off of 72nd street only? 2) The city staff and the Planning commission have publicly stated that they are not in favor of this project proposal as it currently,stands, with the planning commission unanimously against it. Why has the city council voted to move forward with this, when Planning and staff are not in favor? During the recent city council meeting, the comment was made that there hasn't been this kind of turnout in favor of following the city's comp. plan, and no one came out for the discussion on the Lennar site As a resident in this area, I was not aware of the Lennar site until after the fact, same for Byerly's, and the Southdale.parking lot project. This project came to my attention, because a neighbor Was notified, as required by law due to his_ property being.within a'certain proximity to the project. I became aware of all the other projects,.when I saw a flier in the Sun current. As a resident of Edina, I came to the meetings when we developed the comp. plan, and I gave my input. My understanding was that the city develops a comp. plan with a broad input, and then follows r that. I didn't think the residents needed to attend the city meetings to make sure we were following the comp. plan. Now, that I am aware, l am writing you with the following concerns 1) School impact. .l. heard in the recent'city_,council meeting that the 7200 France project will add up to 50 more children to the school::Byerly's is under discussion.as to which school it will impact, Southdale parking lot project will impact.Cornelia. To make you aware, there are between 500 -600 kids at Cornelia. Due to the.recentdecision to have full time kindergarten, the school had to build more classrooms. No increase in population, just full time Kindergarten. In the coming years, there will be most likely another —100 kids. That means taking out more land space for more construction of classrooms. But, the generali facilities are already taxed beyond their limits. The library, lunch room, gyms, playground, etc.... weren't built for such a- population. Lunch is already from .11.00 - 1.30: Adding more kids will.drive an all day lunch program. Just an example of what all the new housing units will do to the school. I'm glad to hear the city is meeting with the school this week to discuss these matters, but.l don't know the discussions are.this clear. 2) My biggest concern is the density of the current proposal, and what will happen with the rest of this section of France Ave (66th to, 78th). If you drive up and down this section of ,France, there are many properties similar to this one with plenty of opportunity to redevelop, with older smaller buildings sitting on larger acreage lots. Going from 0.5 FAR in the current comp. plan to —1.5 is a significant variance. Have we thought through all the impacts to the city? Water, seWer,r police, fire, streets, sanitation, snow removal, etc....? And I'm not just talking about what the one building will do, but a larger redevelopment of this area? Obviously, it's not only coming, it's here and started, upwards of 1,000 new housing units already under construction or in planning phases. Are we ready for that? And maybe a few thousand more? s) What happens to this property in the longterm? My concern is with such thigh density, can this property be maintained and updated as needed over time. Initially everything is new and shiny. No problem getting tenants at the rates we need. But I've seen other properties start out that way, and over time the rents don't keep up, because the property becomes less desirable. For example, the Park Lawn apartments in the 1980's were a great place to live, as I know people who have lived there at that time. Now, I know people who live there, and it isn't all that great. The buildings look OK from the outside. But I've been in them, and'the interiors are not well maintained..I can only guess that is due to the low quality of the build, and the small living space. This comes back to my primary concern about density. How do we assure ourselves that this dense property will be maintained and not become run down? I'm not saying we should deny redevelopment. It will happen with or without the city's cooperation. Builders can redevelop within the current comp. plan without the city council approval. What I am saying, is that we should take a moment to reflect on what we as a community want to see this part of town look like, and then encourage the developers to meet that vision. I think if the city council granted the planning commissions request to do a mini comp plan for this, it would go a long way in developing a strategic long term plan that will be welcomed by residents and developers. Currently, developers know they can buy property in the city, come in with an oversized plan, reduce is slightly, and get a significant exception to what they should be building. ` a the developer of this property is a reasonable developer, they will wait a few months for us to Figure out what is going to work long term. They won't jump to build a small office space property, if they know that there will be something better in a few months. As a final thought, here is a proposed process to keep the comp. plan fresh and current, while also keeping the community involved. 1) Build a comp. plan with community involvement. This' is whaf we already do, and I have already. been to meetings for the next -comp. plan and have given my input. 2) We follow,the comp. plan as a city in general. The city will-'be;barrying out the intent of what is designed. 3) If a modification to the comp. plan is needed, the community should be notified to give input, and as a community, we can adjust and decide collectively what we want our city to be. . 4) Builders can build within our current vision of what we-want the city to be, by following our comp. plan, or asking us a, city to adjust. Expectations will. be clear for the developers. If they think the comp. plan needs to be adjusted, they will know to expect a reasonable process to do so. Thanks for listening to me, and please allow this ,significant decision -to be given the proper time it needs to come to a reasonable` solution'that -works for all. Cary Teague, Please forward this on to the` Planning Commission. Tom O'Connell 7333 Oaklawn Ave. 952 - 649 -7125 Deb Manaen From: Rozanne Andersen < Rozanne .Andersen @OntarioSystems.com> rent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:00 AM Jackie Hoogenakker; Edina Mail,joseph.palmersheim @ecm- inc.com; lisa.kaczke @ecm- inc.com; mark.weber @ecm - inc.com Subject: RE:BLOCK OFF ALL TRAFFIC ON 72 ND / PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 7200 FRANCE AVE Good Day Edina City Council, Tonight you will convene to discuss the proposed development of the property located at 7200 France Avenue. On behalf of myself, family and. neighbors who live within 500 feet of the property and on or within feet of 72nd Street we strongly, if not emphatically, urge you to completely block off all cut through traffic on 72nd Street to and from France Avenue by building or requiring the developer to build, a lovely, park like area that spans 72nd street so cars cannot travel through.. [Bike and walking path should be included however]. If you at least do this for us and require the changes upon which you already conditioned development you will have done a great service to our little neighborhood and most importantly the children of this Edina neighborhood. For at the end of the day isn't one of the reasons you are called to govern — our collective safety? Rozanne M. Andersen. Esq. 204 Bristol Circle, Edina, MN. 55435 . Jntario Systems I Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer t 952.221.6267 I f 765- 751 -7498 1150 West Kilgore ONTA RID Avenue I Muncie, IN 47305 -1588 S. r S -T.[ M S �._®ntarioSvstems:cam 1 800.283.3227 Disclaimer:. This information contained in this email and any attachments or links associated with this email is not intended as legal advice and may not be used as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort has been made to assure this information is up -to -date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel. The author(s) and Ontario Systems assume no liability for typographical or other errors contained in the email or any attachments or links associated with this email or for changes in the law affecting anything discussed herein. From: Rozanne Andersen Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 1:20 PM To: 'JHoogenakker @edinamn.gov'; 'mail @edinamn.gov'; 'joseph.paimersheim @ecm - inc.com'; 'lisa.kaczke@ecm- inc.com'; 'mark.weber @ecm- inc.com' Cc:' beetlebug00@ gmail. com';' halljan22@ gmail .com';'cathylc @mac.com';'Collin Nelson'; kanelson09 @gmail.com; smandersen20ll @gmaii.com iubject: RE: PLEASE SHARE WITH COUNCIL - VOTE NO RE: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 7200 FRANCE AVE Members of the Edina City Council, 1 My husband and I have lived in our home on Bristol Circle [cul -de -sac adjacent to proposed development] for almost 21 years. We raised our family in, this home and were thrilled when.in.March of 2014 our daughter and son in law bought their family home on Hibiscus [just blocks from the proposed development] so they too would and could enjoy raising their children, Livy age three and Jack 18 months, in this quiet, close knit, Cornelia neighborhood. We vehemently oppose your approval of the proposed development of 7200 France Ave as presented by Boisclair for four reasons. 1. STOP USE OF 72nd AS A CUT THROUGH /TRAFFIC SAFETY- I recognize my concerns about the proposed development and your apparent proclivity to disregard the Comprehensive Plan are in large part driven by my concern for my family's and my friends' health, safety and well - being; but I want you to know I am equally concerned about the safety of the children who attend Cornelia Elementary. I know first -hand how people use Cornelia Drive [South of 70th] as a speedy cut through to France Avenue as.they make their way during morning and evening rush hour to and from 494. The use of Cornelia Drive and West Shore Drive for this purpose along with the traffic congestion caused by the Cremation Society when services are in progress makes TRAFFIC SAFETY one of'the first reasons you should site for rejecting the development as presented by Boisclair. 2. STOP THE INCREASED- STRESS ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE - Increasing the density of the housing beyond what is permitted in the Comprehensive Plan is simply irresponsible and.short sighted. Unless and until the, Comprehensive Plan is modified to include a fully articulated plan for the development of France Avenue from its northern most border in Edina to its southern most border. at Highway 494 and a Traffic Study and Environmental Impact Study are completed, th'e city council should refuse to approve any land use proposal that deviates from the Comprehensive Plan — period. Any, action contrary,to such an. approach is irresponsible, extremely short sighted and precisely the reason cities such as Brainerd and St. Cloud Minnesota are visually and practically offensive. 3. REMEMBER WHY WE HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION.— It is my understanding our City Manager and perhaps more importantly our Planning Commission have unanimously voted against the development as presented by Boisclair. Does their collective opinion only matterwhen it is convenient or politically beneficial to,the City Council? 4. CLARIFY YOUR VISION /CHAMPS - ELYSEES OR AD HOC DEVELOPMENT? — Quite frankly I travel a lot for my job. I see how cities - across the U.S. have grown to embrace socioeconomic, cultural and business needs in ways that actually beautify a locale. But these successes do not happen by way of ad hoc development. They happen because the city planners and councils have a vision that will address;today's urban needs and the needs of the people for many years, if not generations, to come. Should France Avenue become our Champs Elysees or a thoroughfare through a quaint, quite residential - village? I don't know, but as my elected. officials, I think you,should. Vote no with regard to the proposed Boisclair development and yes to the creation . of a long..range plan that incorporates all the comments and information you are gleaning from those "ask the residents" meetings you are holding, and the surveys you have sent to the residents. You know the expression, "don't be surprised if you don't get to where you want to be if you don't have a plan." PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS! Sincerely, Rozanne and Steve Andersen 7204 Bristol Circle Edina, MN Rozanne M. Andersen. Esq. Ontario Systems I Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer t 952.221.6267 1 f 765 - 751 -7498 1150 West Kilgore ONTARIO Avenue I Muncie, IN 47305 -1588 S.Y 5 T € M 5 www.OntarioSkstems.com 1 800.283.3227 Disclaimer: This information contained in this email and any attachments or links associated with this email is not intended as legal advice and, may not be used as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effoit has been made to assure this information is up -to -date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel. The author(s) and Ontario Systems assume no liability for typographical or other errors contained in the email or any, attachments or links associated with this email or for changes in the law affecting anything discussed herein. Attention: This message and all attachments are private and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message immediately. A. City of Edina, Minnesota DATE RECEN o e x ' CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 9274861 • (952) 927=7645 FAX • (612) 9275461 TDD 5 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER.: A Y— P SG-mF 06R-_ VJ a 006 The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. VAVO-1, kPtte S Pl�66 vor aF �( ('R�a PNw* s between yrJ 'D N ST and T I sf STgtc-t r LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADOMS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S _ SIGNATURE �if�YLL SI.�DCjLsr7 -07- NAME OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) . a / 3� Pa e-m C(� PVC S ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) `f3 2a f-fjA4?J(E W6 S �3" G;�- (t, 4- 7W � fir. �St.3- 3, '3 6g2 -. PHONE There is space for more signatures on. the back. APRIL 2008 NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) Jam''' / rc " 7 v / zt Z CIA -214 Arlyz �3aZ Piave PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence far refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) . This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) r1 k 01 1���, �23z 5cd�,�`�ncut� -�- - 'Com -c —Fra R ,-1,2 qZ 144, qz ,S:c-d� If Lbw "It r - PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2G�- PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) qC r This petition was circulated by: rw- vN 0q(ar 4-120-2 ll-eM-Lre 441� y z e-i S' 3 C-oT r- 7--e2 . 4921 AI- ,-/ -z z z s« 40,o ow& ,4JT� LWL,S S- 5 viz ,v q2,-31 :5a -fe�wa .�. t,te ,v`� -c�v`- �i"Z 7 e qty � c r a- �� Inn n-7 C, I 6SLLt G () r NAME ADDRESS /j1�C 561-IV PLl--C4 PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME- PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (PRINTED) o-4 �V --pri-7 o4nl L-/ o 1r W- r., ►A 7 CILL /23L�L� r2' S t-e � ��, a I `tau N� � �-�� S _ �E�� •, s��r� -f�• � � c- � r`'i -AC,Do tom• � �l 2 3 S' -F� I r,(e� r;Jri�. -r " G D 11 �' 1!In i T M 0 ri V GL Gvv- This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights: about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 Jackie Hoogenakker Yom: Rozanne Andersen <Rozanne .Andersen @OntarioSystems.com >. gent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:00 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker; Edina Mail; joseph.palmersheim @ecm - inc.com; lisa.kaczke @ecm - inc.com; mark.weber @ecm- inc.com Subject: RE:BLOCK OFF ALL TRAFFIC ON 72 ND / PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 7200 FRANCE AVE Good Day Edina City Council, Tonight you will convene to discuss the proposed development of the property located at 7200 France Avenue, On behalf of myself, family and neighbors Who live within 500 feet of the property and on or within feet of 72nd Street we strongly, if not emphatically, urge you to completely block off all cut through traffic on 72nd Street to and from France Avenue by building or requiring the developer to build, a lovely, parklike area that spans 72nd street so cars cannot travel through. [Bike and walking path should be included however]. If you at least do this for us and require the changes upon which you already conditioned development you will have done a great service to our little neighborhood and most importantly the children of this Edina neighborhood. For at the end of the day isn't one of the easons you are called to govern — our collective safety?. Rozanne M. Andersen. Esq. 7204 Bristol Circle, Edina, MN 55435 Ontario Systems 1 Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer t 952.221.6267 1 f -765 -751 -7498 1150 West Kilgore ONTARIO Avenue j Muncie IN 47305 -1588 $vsr'EWS www.OntarioSVstems.com 1 800.283.3227 Disclaimer: This information contained in this email and any attachments or links associated with this email is not intended as legal advice and may not be used as legal advice. Legal advice 'must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort has been made to assure this information is up -to -date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel. The authors) and Ontario Systems assume no liability for typographical or other errors contained in the email or any attachments or links associated with this email or for changes in the law affecting anything discussed herein. . From: Rozanne Andersen Sent: Friday, November 28, 20141:20 PM To: 'JHoogenakker @edinamn.gov'; 'mail @edinamn.gov; 'joseph.palmersheim @ecm - inc.com'; 'lisa.kaczke@ecm- ,c.com ; 'mark.weber @ecm- inc.com' .:c: 'beetlebug00 @gmail.com'; 'halljan22 @gmail.com'; 'cathylc @mac.com'; 'Collin Nelson'; kanelson09 @gmail.com; smandersen20ll @gmail.com Subject: RE: PLEASE SHARE WITH COUNCIL - VOTE NO RE: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 7200 FRANCE AVE Members of the Edina City Council, My husband and I have lived in our home on Bristol Circle [cul -de -sac adjacent to proposed development] for almost 21 years. We raised our family in this home and were thrilled when in March of 2014 our daughter and son in law bought their family home on Hibiscus [just blocks from the proposed development] so they too would and could enjoy raising their children, Livy age three and Jack 18 months, in this quiet, close knit, Cornelia neighborhood. We vehemently oppose your approval of the proposed development of 7200 France Ave as presented by Boisclair for four reasons. 1. STOP USE OF 72nd AS A CUT THROUGH /TRAFFIC SAFETY- I recognize my concerns about the proposed development and your apparent proclivity to disregard the Comprehensive Plan are in large part driven by my concern for-my family's and my friends' health, safety and well- being; but I want you to know I am equally concerned about the safety of the children who attend Cornelia Elementary. I know first -hand how people use Cornelia Drive [South of 70th] as a speedy cut through to France Avenue as they make their way during morning and evening rush hour to and from 494. The use of Cornelia Drive and West Shore Drive for this purpose along with the traffic congestion caused by the Cremation Society when services are in progress makes TRAFFIC SAFETY one of the first reasons you should site for rejecting the development as presented by Boisclair. 2. STOP THE INCREASED STRESS ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE - Increasing the density of the housing beyond what is permitted in the Comprehensive Plan is simply irresponsible and short sighted. Unless and until the Comprehensive Plan is modified to include a fully articulated plan for the development of France Avenue from its northern most border in Edina to its southern most border at Highway 494 and a Traffic Study and Environmental Impact Study are completed, the city council should refuse to approve any land use proposal that deviates from the Comprehensive Plan — period. Any action contrary to such an approach is irresponsible, extremely short sighted and precisely the reason cities such as Brainerd and St. Cloud Minnesota are visually and practically offensive. 3. REMEMBER WHY WE HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION — It is my understanding our City Manager and perhaps more importantly our Planning Commission have unanimously voted against the development as presented by Boisclair. Does their collective opinion only matter when it is convenient or politically beneficial to the City Council? 4. CLARIFY YOUR VISION /CHAMPS - ELYSEES OR AD HOC DEVELOPMENT? — Quite frankly I travel a lot for my job. see how cities across the U.S. have grown to embrace socioeconomic, cultural and business needs in ways that actually beautify a locale. But these successes do not happen by way of ad hoc development. They happen because the city planners and councils have a vision that will address today's urban needs and the needs of the people for many years, if not generations, to come. Should France Avenue become our Champs Elysees or a thoroughfare through a quaint, quite residential village? I don't know, but as my elected officials, I think you should. Vote no with regard to the proposed Boisclair development and yes to the creation of a long range plan that incorporates all the comments and information you are gleaning from those "ask the residents" meetings you are holding and the surveys you have sent to the residents. You know the expression, "don't be surprised if you don't get to where you want to be if you don't have a plan." PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS! Sincerely, Rozanne and Steve Andersen 7204 Bristol Circle Edina, MN Roanne M. Andersen. Esq. Ontario Systems I' Vice. President and Chief Compliance Officer t 952.221.6267 f 765 - 751 =7498 1. 1.50 West Kilgore IrON �ARIO Avenue i Muncie, IN 47305 -1588 PA 5 vAIMOntarioSystems.com 1 800.283.3227 Disclaimer: This information contained in this email and any attachments or links associated with this email is not intended as legal advice and may` not be,used as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort: has been made to assure this information is up -to -date as of the date of publication. It is not intended to be a -full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel. The author(s) and Ontario Systems assume no liability for typographical or other errors contained in the email or any attachments or links associated with this email or for changes in the law affecting anything discussed herein. Attention: This message and all attachments are private and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message immediately. 3 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Richard Naistat <jrnaistat @yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 2:58 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Re: Input to City Council meeting on Dec. 16nd regarding Proposed Rezoning of 7200 France Ave. S. Jackie, Please forward this e-mail to all= members of the City Council,arid the Mayor. I understand that Hennepin County has rejected the request for mid -curb cuts on France Avenue for the 7200 France Ave. property. Good! France Avenue is already over reasonable capacity and the mid -curb cuts would only add to the. congestion ! And I continue to oppose the development due to the likelihood of traffic cutting through our suburban: neighborhood.. The Planning Commission had it right by an 8 -0 vote NOT to approve the developer's plan for 7200. France Avenue complex because of traffic congestion issues. I would ask you to work with the Developer to create a plan where all access to 7200 France Avenue site is from Gallagher. This wow require negotiations with the 7250 France Avenue owners, but should be doable. Rotating the proposed 7200 France Avenue development as suggested by Member Brindle is the way to go to assuage neighborhood concerns over this development. Thank you. Sincerely, Richard J. Naistat 7044 Kellogg Ave. S. Edina, MN 55435 952 - 929 -3235 1 Jackie Hoogenakker 'rom: Barbara Turner <islandbreezes9 @gmail.com> ent: Thursday, December 11,201410:01 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 7200 FRANCE and the Neighborhood Please forward to: Cary Teague Mayor Hovland Members of the City Council If you regularly drive east on 70th Street in the area between Highway 100 and France Avenue, you know there are two options. OPTION #1: If you continue on 70th Street, you'll go 25 mph and you'll have two stoplights and a round - about, a stoplight at Prance Avenue and, if you are heading south, another stoplight at Hazelton. OPTION #2: If you "make a move" and cut through the neighborhood, you can eliminate possibly four red lights, a round - about, AND you can legally drive, practically non -stop, 30mph. .dho wouldn't consider Option #2? As a resident of the Cornelia neighborhood, please do not allow a development to be built at 7200 France that would be THREE TIMES the density that is currently allowed on that site. Sincerely, Barbara L. Turner 7315 Glouchester Dr. 1 Deb Mangen From: Kevan`<nouser22 @ yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:32 PM To: Patrick Wrase Cc: Aaron Kuznia; Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast {net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl@gmail.com Subject: side walk construction on Arbour•. Ave Hello Patrick, Mayor. Havland, and Council members, I'm a resident on Arbour Ave in Edina and recently received a letter indicating where side walks are planning to be built next spring. I've attended the community meetings. on these plans to express my concerns and wanted to bring them to your attention in hopes of making a slight, yet important, adjustment to the proposed plan. My concern is regarding the side walk that will be constructed on the west side of Arbour ave (Sun Rd to Grove. St). I would like to ask why the side walk is being split on- Arbour ave.(built on the east side on one. half and then, the west side on the other). Tome, it makes sense to build the entire side walk only on the Eastside of Arbour Ave. Here is why: 1. The new side walk would directly connect to a pre'exis'ting side walk that runs along Stuart Ave and Grove St. If the side walk is built on the Eastside of Arbour Ave, then this will connect directly to the side walk on Grove St allowing an uninterupted walking.path directly to Countryside Elementary School. The school is located on the East side of Arbour Ave. 2. The kindergarten and elementary school buses pick the children up on the east side ofArbour Ave only a few houses down from us. The school kids usually stand on the side of the street-br in someone's. driveway while they wait for the bus. It would be great for out kids and other children to have a safe side walk to stand on while they wait for the bus. They would also use.that direct path to walk to school or walk to the bus stop. 3. Virtually no landscaping will be effected if the sidewalk is. built.on the East side of Arbour Ave. There are at least two trees on the west side of Arbour Ave that would be effected by the sidewalk. Thank you for taking the time to read this and considering this proposal. I would be happy to meet and show you the area in person if that would be helpful as well. Thanks in advance for any input or thoughts. Sincerely, Kevan Andish and family 5804 Arbour Ave, Edina. 612- 562 -3875 MINUTES OF THE .REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL ..CHAMBERS OCTOBER 22, 2014 7:00: PM. 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll: call was: Hobbs, Lee, Olsen, Seeley, Halva, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton Absent from Roll: Scherer, Schroeder III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Platteter moved approval of the meeting agenda. Commissioner_ Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV.. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ; Commissioner Carr moved approval of the September 10, 2014 meeting minutes with correction. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT John Crabtree, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue addressed the Commission on tree preservation. Commissioner Platteter moved to close community comment. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion, carried. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. - A. Variance. Mark Larson. 5024 Bruce Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission Dave and Kara Walter /Mark Larson /Rehkamp Larson Architects are requesting a 20.25 foot setback variance from the 50 foot setback requirement from Minnehaha Creek to increase basement area below an expanded deck at the same existing nonconforming setback from the Creek. Aaker further explained that the owners are also requesting a second variance to allow Page 1 of 10 modification of an existing nonconforming room above the attached garage. A 5 foot side yard setback variance is requested from the 10 foot side yard setback requirement. The variance is needed to increase the, ridge height of the roof to allow proper ceiling height for the existing small bedroom. Currently theedroom is ,a a step down, with lower ceilings, an under structured floor system and-an HVAC system,, in need of improvements. Continuing, Aaker explained that the subject property is located north of Bruce Place cul -de -' sac consisting of a two story home with an attached two car garage. The home backs up to Minnehaha Creek and provides a 29.75 foot setback from the water body to the existing deck. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 50. foot setback from naturally, occurring lakes, ponds or` streams. The existing home and deck are nonconforming and overlaps the required Creek setback. There will be .a small addition to the main floor kitchen that will conform to the alternate setback standard with the maximum additional encroachment' in the,;setback of no more than 200 square feet, so no variance is required for main floor. kitchen and deck modification at the existing nonconforming setbacks. The applicant is also requesting a 5 foot side yard' setback variance,to modify the._: ceiling height of the upstairs bedroom. The second "floor bedroom above the garage will match the existing nonconforming side yard setback of the existing room. The roof line will be modified to allow for adequate ceiling-height. There is no opportunity to conform given that the existing room above the garage is already too close to the side yard. The proposed bedroom above the garage cannot comply with the zoning ordinance. The garage and bedroom above are at a lower elevation as compared with the neighbor to the east who is at a higher elevation, so height. impact will be minimal. It should be noted that the Planning Commission approved a tear -down re -build on the property in January 2013, with the new home to match the setback of the back deck, bringing all three floors of living space of the new home closer to the Creek edge. The variance was requested by a previous homeowner who never implemented the plan. The permit was not applied'for by the anniversary date of variance approval, so the variance expired and became null and void. See attached approved new home plans for th'e property. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variances. based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R -I, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it slightly alters existing conditions without reducing setback or impacting the surrounding neighbors. b. The imposed setback and existing house location do not provide opportunity for an increase in second floor ceiling height above the garage or expansion of the basement. Page 2 of 10 r C. The original placement of the home closer to Creek and the side yard than currently allowed prohibits expansion in the basement and on the second floor without the benefit of a variance Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: I) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Survey date stamped October 7, 2014. • Building plans/ elevations date stamped October 7, 2014. e Engineering memo dated October 17, 2014 Appearing for the Applicant Mark Larson Discussion Commissioner Carr asked Planner Aaker if staff received any comments; pro or con from neighbors. Planner Aaker responded that to date staff has not received any comments; pro or con. Chair Staunton noted it appears.there is an expired variance for this property. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative, adding a variance expires if a building permit is not applied for one year after approval date Commissioner Forrest commented on the difficulty of establishing an existing setback from the creek since creeks tend to meander. Aaker agreed. Applicant Presentation Mr. Larson reported that the survey submitted is recent, adding the updated survey found that the creek had meandered. Larson said he was looking forward to renovating a great family _ home. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Hearing No comment. Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to closed public hearing carried 7 -0. Page 3 of 10 Motion Commissioner Carr moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff "conditions. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Commissioner., Forrest suggested as part of the findings to include the unusual features of.the. subject lot. Ayes; Nay, Platteter B. Variance. Scott Busyn /Great Neighborhood Homes. 5300 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported the subject property is approximately 59.73 feet in width and is 8,097 °square feet in area and is located in the southwest corner of West 53rd Street and Oaklawn Ave—There `is 'an—,existing single - family home on the property that will be demolished; and the applicant is requesting to rebuild on the lot with a noncompliant setback for a garage opening facing the street. Planner Aaker further explained that Engineering has no concerns with the plans as submitted. The proposed grading as shown by the "Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Plan" dated 9/19/2014 was prepared and signed by Brian Mundstock, a Licensed Engineer in the State of Minnesota. The proposed conditions create a better drainage situation for the three neighboring properties. All of the neighboring properties will see less drainage than existing conditions currently produce due to new site improvements. Our stormwater infrastructure has no limitations in the area and a sump drain line was installed in 2011 during a street reconstruction project. The erosion control plan meets our expectations. The existing driveway and curb cut will be. relocated approximately 25 feet west of its current location, further away from the nearby intersection, and be reduced from .a 22' wide driveway to a 14' driveway. There are no concerns with a new waterline connection or a new sanitary line connection. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance based on the following findings: 1. The property with a new home can comply with the setbacks and is therefore a reasonable use, and the request to deviate from the side street is not necessary to make reasonable use of the property. 2. The home is appropriate in size and scale with the proposed garage; however the garage can comply with the °required setback. 3. There is not a practical difficulty in meeting the ordinance requirements due to the ability to locate a garage in a conforming location. Page 4 of 10 4. There are no circumstances unique to the property that necessitates a variance to make reasonable use of the property. The property will be a vacant 59.73 foot wide lot in a neighborhood of other 59 60 foot wide lots with many that have been rebuilt on within the ordinance requirements. A new. home with.a garage can be designed to conform. Appearing for the Applicant Scott;Busyn, Great. Neighborhood Homes, Brian Smith, property owner'. Applicant Presentation Scott Busyn addressed -the Commission and explained he has built and renovated .a number of homes in Edina, adding he believes the.plans proposed for the new house are appropriate. Busyn explained that the proposed building location creates functionality and is aesthetically pleasing. The position of house /garage allows a usable rear yard where children can play. The large Oak tree is also retaining with the proposed building placement. Contusing, Busyn also stated in his opinion the plans as presented are sensitive to drainage and storm water management by creating the right balance. Busyn concluded that he held.-a neighborhood meeting, adding no issues were raised at that meeting. Discussion Commissioner Carr thanked Mr. Busyn for his effort to save trees and asked if the Oak in the front yard would be saved. Mr. Busyri . responded he was unsure if that tree could be saved. He said it may be possible to shift the building back; however, it is difficult to guarantee that tree would remain; it's iffy. Carr suggested if the Oak is lost that it be replaced. Commissioner Platteter commented it would have beneficial to have a survey or materials reflecting trees saved /lost. Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. The following resident spoke in support of the project as submitted. Barbara Whalen, 5301 Kellogg Avenue, addressed the Commission. Brian Smith, 5300 Oaklawn, property owner,, addressed the Commission and explained they love the neighborhood and believe Mr. Busyn will build a house that maintains the character of the neighborhood. Schmidt further stated it is their intent to keep all the trees they can; trees are part of the character of this neighborhood. Page 5 of 10 Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the proposal; being none Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Olsen stated she tends to agree with the applicants that a conforming location would be a detriment to the lot and neighborhood. She pointed out that although this will be new built other homes in the area have garages with nonconforming setbacks; reiterating she agrees with the applicants the plans as presented are best for the site and neighborhood. A discussion continued with Commissioners in agreement the plans as presented suit the site better than a conforming location would. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend variance approval subject to the Findings that include the overly large right -of -way; the existence of mature trees, and the existence of other nonconforming setbacks in the neighborhood. Approval is also tied to the plans presented that maintain the existing setbacks, and lot coverage. Approval is also conditioned on saving the three (3) existing pine trees on the west as well as the Oak on the east and west; if the Oak in the front yard is lost it is to be replaced with another Oak. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Commissioner Carr suggested the following amendment - that during the construction process trees be preserved in accordance with the Watershed District guidelines; approval is also conditioned on Watershed District approval if applicable. All voted aye; motion to approve carried. 7 -0. C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: "Sidewalk Facilities Plan" Staff presentation Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner addressed the Commission and presented a Sidewalk Facilities Plan for an amendment to the Pedestrian and Bike Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan. Nolan explained the "new" Sidewalk Facilities Plan is based on part of the 2008 Comprehensive plan, the Living Streets policy and input from City staff. Nolan said at a work session the City Council requested an updated Sidewalks Facilities Plan prior to final approval of a Living Streets Plan. Nolan noted currently the "Plan" is in the "public comment" period of the process with the Council scheduled to hear the proposed amendment on November 3, 2014. Nolan concluded that numerous comments in support of the "Plan" have been received; including two negative comments. Page 6of10 .f Discussion Commissioner Seeley asked Mr. Nolan if it was found that pedestrians are unsafe without sidewalks. Nolan responded their findings indicate pedestrians are safer off the street. Commissioner Platteter commented that the proposed amendment is a piece of the proposed Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan, eould.fold into the Comprehensive Plan when it's updated. Commissioner. Lee asked Mr. Nolan if there was flexibility in sidewalk size. Mr. Nolan responded there is an element of flexibility; however, the City's goal is for a 5 -foot boulevard and 5 -foot sidewalk. Lee questioned how sidewalks are prioritized.. Nolan said as the City develops its Capital Improvements Plan sidewalks ,are prioritized. Sidewalks can also be done on a case by case basis for safety reasons, connectivity to schools, etc. A`discussion ensued with Commissioners wondering if streets can be narrowed, if boulevards are private or publicly owned and who is responsible for boulevard and sidewalk maintenance. In response to questions Mr. Nolan explained that °streets can be narrowed when opportunities arise. Boulevards in residential areas are generally.publically owned; however maintenance of the boulevard falls to the property owners. Nolan said discussions on boulevard plantings continue; reiterating boulevard maintenance is done by the property owners. Continuing, Nolan also reported that sidewalk maintenance falls to the property. owners unles&..they are located on a State -Aid road or road connecting,to public schools. Questions were raised if sidewalks reduce vehicle speed and if a narrower street reduces speed. Mr. Nolan responded he doesn't believe the introduction of sidewalks in itself reduce vehicle speed; however, when other engineering tools are implemented such as narrowed streets, bump outs, plantings,. etc. speed is reduced. Nolan reiterated sidewalks provide safety for pedestrians. Commissioners asked if a tree study would be done during the sidewalk process, acknowledging trees could be lost through sidewalk construction. Mr. Nolan responded all sidewalks are subject to a feasibility study, property notice, public input etc. Nolan also said study is also done on which side of the street is best for the sidewalk and where possible trees would be saved. Commissioner Platteter said with regard to sidewalks and trees he has seen sidewalks introduced that actually go around trees. Nolan agreed, adding as previously mentioned all sidewalks are thoroughly studied and noticed before constructed. Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Deanne Dubbs, 5316 Maddox Lane addressed the Commission on the issue of sidewalks. Page 7 of 10 Tom Dewey, 5612 Concord Avenue addressed the Commission on the issue of sidewalks Commissioner Platteter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing approved. Two residents on West Shore Drive addressed the Commission on the issue of sidewalks. Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented as she understands it a sideway improvement plan and public input process is required before City Council approves specific sidewalk locations. Continuing, Forrest said what's before the Commission this evening is an amendment that updates the Comprehensive Sidewalk Facilities Plan. This "update" provides the public with information on future sidewalk locations. Nolan agreed, reiterating all sidewalk improvement plans would be noticed and heard by the City Council before constructed; adding sidewalks can also "go away" or be added as the City evolves. The Comprehensive Plan Sidewalks Facilities plan doesn't signify immediate sidewalk construction. Commissioner Hobbs stated in his opinion its good that the City provides residents with a sidewalk facilities plan. Commissioners and Chair Staunton agreed, adding it provides transparency. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chair Staunton reiterated he supports the amendment, adding transparency is important and the Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan provides that transparency. Staunton further noted all proposed sidewalks will be noticed by the City and heard by the City Council for review and approval. This also provides residents with the ability to share their concerns or support for sidewalks in their area. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Lot Division. David Hendel. 5320 Kelsey Terrace, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague reported that Mr. David Hendel on behalf of the property owners Paul and Jean Mooty, is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides the property at 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B.of the Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition. Both properties are owned by the Mootys. The purpose of the request is to shift the side lot line to the north to make room for Page 8of10 an addition to the existing home. The Outlot appears to be a leftover remnant of Parkwood Knolls 26`h addition, that ended up being platted as an Outlot. The Outlot originally appears as part of Lot 26 in the Preliminary Plat. Planner Teague concluded t that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot B of Parkwood Knolls 26`h Addition subject to the following findings: The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot. 2. The Outlot and 5320 Kelsey Terrace are both held under the same ownership. The properties appear to be one lot. 3. The existing utilities on the Outlot would not be impacted. Approval is also subject to the following condition: I. The existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated prior to filing of the approving resolution with Hennepin County. Discussion Commissioners questioned why minor lot line rearrangements and party wall divisions can't be accomplished administratively. Teague explained that at this time Code requires Commission and Council review. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion the lot should be combined as one lot; not continue as two. Teague responded that would require a re- platting and at this time the property owner has requested this action. Motion Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend lot division approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Hobbs seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Olsen, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton. Nay; Lee. Motion carried. Vill. CORESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Platteter noted this past Tuesday a work session on the proposed tree ordinance was held. Platteter said there was good discussion, adding he believes there is good momentum to move forward on the ordinance. Page 9 of 10 Commissioner Lee updated the Commission on the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan project. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that the City Council approved the -Beacon project for homeless . youth. Teague further reported that staff is considering enacting a 30 -day lead time on variance applications. The extra time is needed to ensure that all materials are presented and, reviewed by staff and the Commission before the meeting. Teague pointed out presently there is such a short turn over time that items are missing or revisions are needed and the Commission doesn't get them until the meeting. This isn't enough time for staff to comment or for Commissioners to make an educated decision. XI. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hobbs moved meeting adjournment at 10:30 P.M. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. Page 10 of 10 PLANNING =MM SSION , NAME TERM J F M A Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session of # Mtgs Attend ance %; Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 Madison Seeley Student ill 11 1 1 ill 7 90% Forrest, Arlene 2/1 /2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 23 92% Olsen, Jo Ann 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 81% Platteter, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill 1 1 1 1 1 23 92% Potts, Ken 2/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 28% Lee, Susan 2/1 /2017 111 1 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 90% Scherer, Nancy Nyrop 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 17 68% Schroeder, Michael 2/1 /2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 68% Staunton, Kevin 2/1 /2015 1 11 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 22 88% Carr, Claudia Halva, Taylor 2/1 /2016 Student 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 20 84% 80% Ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill 1 1 1 Kilberg, Benjamin 9/1/2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 48% Hobbs, Steve 1 1 1 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 10 100% A member who misses four consectutive regular meetings, or attends less than 75% of the scheduled meetings, shL be deemed to have resigned as a member of the planning commission. Liaisons: Include this report in the Planning Commission packet monthy. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meetine numbers & attendance oercental=_es will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w /Quorum Counted as Meetinq Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1 "under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. •A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL November 10, 2014 7 p.m. , 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Gieseke called the Meeting to order at 7:13 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL Answerin&roll call were Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick. Member Cella arrived at 8:39 p.m. Student Members present: Colwell, Chowdhury Absent Downing, Greene, Segreto 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Jones asked to switch Item C with Item A. Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Steel, to switch Item C with Item A on the agenda. Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel Jacobson, McCormick. Motion. Carried. Member Steel made a motion, seconded by Member. Jones, approving the meeting agenda as amended. Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick. Motion Carried. IV.: - ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Jacobson, approving the consent agenda as follows: W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board meeting of Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2014 Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick Motion Carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.C. Redevelopment Planning for Former Public Works Site Update Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager, gave the presentation on redevelopment planning for the former Public Works site. . Member Jones asked what the Park Board involvement would be in this process. Mr. Neuendorf stated at this point, it is up to the Park Board. The City - Council has directed that a portion of this site be for public use and a portion for private use. He assumed the public portion would.be some type of parks and rec facility. r Member Jacobson asked how the Lid project would be part of the Grandview project or would they be separate projects. Mr. Neuendorf stated these would be separate projects. The Lid was a proposal to be innovative on how they integrate transportation and land use. He noted the Lid project, at the earliest, is ten years away. Member Steel wondered if they could pull data from the needs assessment that would be relevant to that project and cross - tabulate it as far as ages and location of residents. That would help them to see from a parks & recreation standpoint what residents are looking for. Mr. Neuendorf stated they could definitely look into it and indicated that it is an important study with a couple of questions in it that are directly relevant to the site. He stated he was not sure about the statistical significance of this. Member Steel noted it was her understanding that they received so many results that in certain points cross - tabulation is not going to be valuable but for the large majority that data should be very valid. Member Jones stated one of the specific questions that had to do with Grandview showed that 73 percent of Edina residents support a new indoor community space on that site. She stated this process has been going for a long time and there was a lot of public engagement. She thought a lot of work went into this to create a good framework. She thought that the council and Mr. Neuendorf should understand that the people that worked on that as well as the people that filled out the surveys really want the city to honor their time and work. She thought it seems that every time this process begins again what happened in the past does not matter. She thought the public has spoken and they want a public amenity. She stated that would be her expectation and of the people that participated. Member Deeds seconded what was said. He stated there is very little public space left and very little developable space in the city. The long -term benefit of investment in amenities to the broader real estate prices in the city will probably benefit more from building the amenities up than from another restaurant, apartments or condominiums. He noted they have very little in the way of park or public space left to make use of and thought if they really thought this through and consider how they compete with other suburbs in the area and what they compete on and if they do not remain a destination suburb for people moving into the Twin Cities, they cannot keep their property values. He thought this needed to be taken seriously and thought about. He thought a long -term benefit to the city, a good public space, probably has higher returns than another shopping center. Member Steel asked what has resulted with the school district discussions. Mr. Neuendorf stated so far he has met with the Parent Leadership Commission and given them the same invitation for discussion as he gave the Park Board. He talked to the school district on several different occasions. Member Steel wondered where they fit into this puzzle. Mr. Neuendorf thought there was a good relationship between the city and the school district about working together. As they begin the process about this site, he was making the same invitation to all of the different groups to come together and decide how they can work best together'and what is the real need of the site and what are they willing to pay for on this site and how can they maximize the efficiency and do it most effectively. Mr. Neuendorf indicated the school district is looking to redevelop the bus garage in the near future to accommodate new buses that will not fit in the garage. He thought the city and school district were looking at different time frames and he imagined that in the next generation both properties will look differently but they will probably occur one after another. Member Jones thought she saw a request for three million dollars from Mr. Neuendorf to buy that site in the most recent Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Neuendorf stated there is a draft Capital Improvement Plan the City Council will look at during their next meeting. He put a placeholder in the plan but it was not to buy the existing site. P) Member Jones asked if the City Council has taken any other action with respect to 'the Public Works site besides passing the framework. Mr. Neuendorf stated there were a lot of different actions. taken.,, He reviewe&the actions made by the City Council. He thought when this comes back in the spring for review there will be more options to discuss and choose from. VI.A. Golf Course Projects Update Joe Abood, General Manager 'of Braemer Golf Course, gave a presentation on the golf course update. Member Deeds asked what the target for completion of the driving range and the redesigned executive course is. Mr. Abood stated the completion should be done.by the summer of 2016. Member McCormick asked where the leagues would go that used the Fred Richards Course and did not commit to Braemer Golf Course. -.Mr. Abood did not provide a specific response but stated that there are several other courses in the area. Member Jones was wondering what the scope of the task force is. Mr. Abood stated everything that is in the scope of this project is for.the betterment of the park as a whole. They are looking at anything that would make this a better amenity for the community. Member Jones indicated she would highly encourage more paths and walking paths. Mr. Abood indicated that is the goal of the task force; they want to bring people into the facility, not just golfers. They want to make it a place in the community that'people can feel . proud of and visit. Member Deeds asked if there was'any movement on vendors in terms of the restaurant. Mr. Abood stated there is some movement, nothing is finalized and they are still in the contracting phase but it does look promising. Ms. Kattreh hoped to have a lease agreement for City Council approval by next Tuesday. Member Gieseke stated some of the concerns he heard in closing down the Fred was,how they can do right for all of the user groups, in particular the youth, seniors and beginner groups. He wondered what they were envisioning to make sure they accommodate all of the groups that used the Fred. Mr. Abood stated they are trying to engage all of the people that were playing at the Fred and let them know, there is availability at Braemar and the programs they are offering are excellent. Member: Steel recommended updating and boosting the website on the Braemar project to which Mr. Abood replied,he would get that updated. Member Deeds asked if there was information on the website with regards to Richard Mandell and thought maybe they should show some,of, the golf courses he has designed in, order to generate some excitement for Braemar: Mr. Abood stated they will get that information on the website. Member Steel thought this should also be shared on social media. Member Jones stated she has been hearing really good reviews and welcomed Mr. Abood. Mr. Abood indicated he was very excited to be in the community and felt Braemar has the potential to do extremely well in the future and they are on the right path to doing that. VI.B. Staff Recommended 2015 — 2019 Capital Improvement Plan Ms. Kattreh gave a Power Point presentation on the 2015 -2019 Capital Improvement Plan. Member Deeds asked for clarification on the priority listings on the two pages Ms. Kattreh gave the Park Board. Ms. Kattreh stated those were from the Finance Committee. They ranked their list of priorities from I to 71. Member Deeds asked what Ms. Kattreh's top priorities were. Ms. Kattreh indicated -this was .a difficult process for them. They are looking at a park.system with some aging infrastructure, park shelter buildings in need of replacement along with playgrounds that are in need of replacement. She indicated she was eager to get through the strategic planning process so they can prioritize and put budgets and years to some of these projects. There is a high focus on the Braemer Park project this year. r Member McCormick asked regarding the golf course piece, the course renovation is a five and she wondered if this was a lower priority. Ms. Kattreh stated they are recommending the course renovation not be done in the next two years. Anything that is ranked one through four is likely to be funded in the next two years of the CIP and they are not going to be ready to do any renovations to Braemer for two years. Ms. Kattreh reviewed with the Park Board how the CIP plan works. Member Jacobson asked regarding the Fred, how Ms. Kattreh would foresee the funding for the Fred conversion. Ms. Kattreh indicated that would not likely come out of the CIP but that a conversation will take place once the Master Plan starts next summer. Member Jones asked if the answer would also apply to the Grandview project. - Ms. Kattreh indicated that was correct. Member Deeds asked if the dome project was also a separate project. Ms. Kattreh indicated that was a separate bond project. Member Jones indicated she had a question on the park shelter buildings because she thought they needed improvements. She asked if they agreed to putting on siding and roofs, did that mean they would be removed from the CIP for replacement for an indeterminate number of years. Ms. Kattreh stated that is one part of the CIP that has been a little misleading. When they submitted their CIP projects as far as the shelter buildings she wanted to make sure that the Park Board and City Council understood the financial liability that is outstanding with the shelter buildings knowing they were not likely to get funding within the CIP to replace the buildings because there is not enough funding in the CIP to be able to do that. She noted it was determined by their Facility Manager that the roofs and shelter buildings should not be delayed longer because of their condition. They felt like it was in the city's best interest to spend approximately $16,000 per shelter building to at least keep them safe and functioning for the next few years. Ms. Kattreh stated she would like to wait to do maintenance on the shelter buildings until they finish the Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan and see how the Park Board and City Council feel about the buildings and then talk about a funding source for these and then prioritize the buildings and maintenance that needs to be done. Member Gieseke asked what the need is for a new snowmobile and what is it used for now. Ms. Kattreh stated it is actually a show mobile and is like a portable stage. She thought this would be another great discussion for the Park Board and they should decide if the city should invest in a portable stage they can move around to different parks for events and performances or would they be better. off investing in amphitheaters in different parks. Member Steel stated the meaningful discussion is the funding sources because she would not be confident in the future if they have unstable funding. She also noted that trails were a big item on the survey and assumed they would have some repairs and wondered how they would fund .those. Ms. Kattreh stated there is actually a budget line for trails in the park maintenance budget so they have the ability to maintain their current trails within the park budget. Member Jones noted the list for playground equipment in the CIP for replacement in 2015 shows some playground equipment being replaced before other playground equipment that was scheduled to be done sooner. Ms. Kattreh thought that would be a great thing to address as part of the strategic plan. Member Gieseke thought they needed to also address equitability of equipment in general in their strategic planning. Member Jones wondered if they were metering the irrigation they install. Ms. Kattreh indicated she could put together a study on which ones are metered and which ones are not. She thought most of the general park facilities are not metered and more of the enterprise facilities are metered. Member Jones suggested they install metering as they put in new irrigation. Ms. Kattreh agreed. 4 VI.D.. Community Needs Assessment Study Ms. Kattreh gave a Power Point presentation on the Community Needs Assessment Study. Member Gieseke asked if they had any idea of how Edina compares to similar cities. Ms. Kattreh stated in the report there:are specific benchmarks and Edina is compared to some of the suburbs around Chicago on the north and west side. In a lot of cases they are really close to the higher percentages but have a little work to do.in order to improve. Member Steel asked what the next step is in the process. Ms. Kattreh stated they have a lot ofthe cross tabs available in the report and she thought the next step would be to have a more detailed strategic discussion with the planning consultants as to how to use that cross tab data. Member Jones wondered what people meant by trails. Ms. Kattreh thought in terms of their survey it was used pretty generically andas they are looking at the strategic plan it will be critical that they look at all types of trails. Generally it was vague in terms of the survey. They did hear about biking, walking and nature'trails along with connectivity. Member Jacobson stated as she was reading through the results she realized "there- was a need to accommodate more walking. Ms. Kattreh agreed. VLE. Park System Strategic Plan Update Ms. Kattreh updated the Park Board on the Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan and went through the schedule. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VILA. Council Updates No discussion. VII.B. Other Correspondence No discussion. VII.C. Veteran's Memorial Committee, June 20, 2014 Minutes and Aug. 29; 2014 Minutes Ms. Kattreh stated the construction of the Veteran's Memorial is well underway and coming along well. VIII: CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Geiseke'stated in regard to the Veteran's Memorial Committee meeting, there is a note about a potential name change and he wondered what that was in regards to. Ms. Kattreh indicated she has not been involved in that conversation and cannot comment on that. Member McCormick asked if the work plan was approved. Ms. Kattreh indicated it was not approved yet but would be by the end of the year. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh went through staff comments and updates with the Park Board. x ADJOURNMENT Chair Gieseke moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:01 p.m. Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick Motion Carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:01 p.m. 5 r Edina Art and. Culture Commission Meeting `- Meeting Minutes City of Edina,, Minnesota Edina Art Center Studio' 14 September 23, 2014 - 4:30, P.M. I. Call to Order Chair Meifert called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Commissioners Absent: Hafed Bouassida and Kitty O'Dea. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. Students Representatives Present: Sophia Munic and Jack Ready. Community Members Present: Hilary Santoni. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair Meifert noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. No additions to the agenda voiced. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner Ellis that the Arts and Culture Commission approve ie September 23, 2014 Agenda as presented. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes. Regular Meeting of August 28, 2014. B. Gener-al MaRagm!s Repo Chair Meifert asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 28, 2014. No changes voiced. It was requested that Items B, C, and D be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered under the Reports section of the meeting. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner Ellis that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. V. Community Comment o comments made. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Edina Vision Commissioner Raeuchle reported that the City hired:a consultant to assistiin the process of developing a Vision for the City of Edina for the next 15 to 30 years. The Commission discussed the °Edina Vision process that has been, identified and the possibility for the Commission /Art Center to host a public meeting in order to provide additional. input on the vision for the City. It was noted that a grout-. of 12 people would be required.for that group to request a public meeting and multiple meetings will be held throughout the process. Commissioner Raeuchle recommended that the group provide direction to Mr. Frey to contact Heather Branigin and publicize the meeting. Mr. Frey questioned how the resident feedback from the meeting would be gathered and whom it would be presented. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that the meeting would be run by the consultant. Commissioner Suckow confirmed that any 12 residents could. request`s meeting. Mr. Frey questioned if there is a time frame for these meetings to be held. Commissioner Raeuchle believed that the meetings would begin October 8`h'and take place over the two to three weeks following. Mr. Frey stated that he will contact Ms. Branigin to setup a meeting and would also send out an email invitation to the Art Center mailing list. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Art and Culture Commission schedule a public meeting for the purpose of discussing the Edina Vision. Ayes: Kandace Ellis; Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. B. Grandview Committee Commissioner Raeuchle stated that the City Council has approved a preferred development partner for the project. He also referenced the idea of a lid, which would place a "lid" on Highway 100 across from City Hall to provide additional public space, and noted that idea is once again being considered. He referenced the vision for the community building for the arts and the input that had been provided by the Commission at the previous meeting. Commissioner Suckow suggested perhaps placing images of two buildings next to each other to further identify that the pictures are simply examples and not a rendering of a building completed by the Commission. He noted that because the City has hired a developer, perhaps these concepts should be provided to the developer and the'Council sooner rather than later. Commissioner Raeuchle provided additional information regarding the research the Commission has previously done regarding the Art Center and noting that there is no room for expansion at the current facility. Commissioner Ellis stated that she agreed that perhaps this information should be presented to the City Council in order for the Commission to put forth their suggestions, and believed that the Commission should be proactive. Commissioner Raeuchle believed that if the Commission approved this document that it would move forward to the City Council in that manor, noting that the Commission can then forward copies to the other Commissions and individuals involved in the Grandview process. Chair Meifert believed that the information should be provided in'a presentation format to ensure that individuals do not misinterpret the information. Commissioner Raeuchle confirmed that,the Commission would like to request that an item. be added to a future City Council meeting agenda. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Art and Culture Commission request that the City Council consider the. recommendations of the Commission for a community building for the arts, whether through the Edina Visioning process or through the Grandview process. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. Chair Meifert suggested that a deadline be placed on the document to be completely finished. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that he is leaving to be out of town for three weeks and would not be able to incorporate the suggestions. ammissioner Ellis suggested that she and Commissioner La Valleur could meet to incorporate the suggestions. C. Ways & Means Committee There was no report. D. Public Art Working Group Commissioner La Valleur noted that she had ballots with her if there are Commissioners that have not cast their votes for the sculptures, as the voting time will be expiring. She referenced an upcoming golf event and welcomed any interested Commissioner to attend. She also referenced the Percentage for the Arts concept and believed that should now be presented to the City Council, noting that the City Manager is in support of that presentation. She stated that perhaps the presentation to'the Council should occur after the October 81h panel at Forecast Public Art at which information can be gained from experts in this area. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that this information presents that this would be a tax and believed that a better concept would be to require that a certain percentage of a project budget be specified for public art aspects. Commissioner Suckow stated that the idea would be that this would apply to City funded projects. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that he would prefer that this apply not only to City projects but also to commercial projects. Commissioner Ellis believed that this concept would, and should, apply to both City and commercial developments. Commissioner Suckow suggested that this concept be tabled until after the October 8th panel, as additional information will be gathered at that time. lotion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Art and Culture Commission table the Percentage for Arts concept until after the October 8th Forecast Public Art panel discussion. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. E. Music in Edina Working Group Commissioner Ellis advised that the working group held their last meeting in August and discussed continuing the music series into the fall and winter. She stated that Hilary Santoni is present today and has been an active part of the working group. Hilary Santoni, Minnehaha Music, stated that she has been a resident of Edina since 2000 and has.been active in the Edina schools and community. She explained that Minnehaha Music is an reperetory orchestra and also an organization focused with enhancing people's connection with great music.- She stated that the organization is composed of a diverse group of musicians whom live throughout the Twin Cities area that simply want to further hone their skills. She stated that the group was newly formed the previous September and will hold their first concert in November at the auditorium at Southview Middle School. Commissioner Ellis stated that from the perspective of the working group, this would be a perfect example of how the Commission can support musical endeavors within the community and to partner with the schools. She stated that the working group would like to provide a donation to help support this group. Mr. Frey stated that the Commission received $10,000 from the City Council for the purpose of Music in Edina for the 2014 year, noting that the summer in the park series used a balance of approximately $6,000. He stated that Commission has the concerts at Southview Middle School and as well as the concerts on February 14th and March 13th at Braemar Golf Course as upcoming events. s. Santoni stated that she would be extremely thankful for any donations or marketing support that the Commission lould provide. Chair Meifert stated that he thought the summer music series was successful and believed that the working group should discuss the next summer series in order to provide more diversity in the type of music. Commissioner Ellis agreed but noted that it is difficult to secure performers when funding is not secure. Commissioner Raeuchle believed that it would be beneficial for the organizations mentioned to be linked with Music in Edina and supported this initiative. He explained that the Commission does not necessarily have to host an event but support the events of other music organizations in the City. Mr. Frey stated that any donation from Music in Edina would need to be approved by the full Commission. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that this concert could be sponsored by the Music in Edina Working Group and believed that the focus should be on marketing and branding in order to strengthen that umbrella concept. Ms. Santoni agreed that it would be important to have a recognizable logo that could be listed with event promotions and could specify, "sponsored by Music in Edina ". Chair Meifert stated that perhaps a yearly schedule could be created that could be presented to the Council in order to support a request for additional funding. Commissioner Miller confirmed that Music in Edina would be the sole sponsor for this event. Ms. Santoni noted that the ticket sales support about one third of the budget, with the gap made up through fundraising, she estimated the budget to be approximately $6,000. Mr. Frey noted that the Music.in Edina logo and Art and Culture Commission identification listed on the summer music series would be used for marketing of this event. Commissioner Raeuchle believed that the Music in EdinarWorking Group should plan out the remaining of the scheduled concerts in order to determine the amount of funds available to sponsor the November concert. Mr. Frey believed that Music in -Edina would be capable of coming to their own decision in terms of funding. It was noted that this was simply informational, as the Music in Edina Working Group does not need to obtain the approval of the Commission to sponsor organizations such as Minnehaha Music. F. General Manager's Report Mr. Frey referenced the financial highlights of the report, noting that compared,to the previous year the Art Center registration is up $20,000 for 2014. He stated that :a decision regarding the media studio will need to be considered. He advised that the membership database is being transferred to a new system, which will allow for easier input of information. He reported that the 30th Annual Members Juried Show will take place Thursday from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. and asked any available Commissioners to attend and assist with the event. He stated that 255 entries were received and 95 of those entries were selected for the show. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Meifert asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. Vlll. Chair and Board Commissioner Comments Commissioner Ellis thanked the Commission for their support of the Music in Edina and their support to other music organizations within Edina. IX. Staff Comments No comments. X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Raeuchle and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Art and Culture Commission adjourn the meeting at 6;07'p.m. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Thomas Raeuchle, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. Public Art, Edina Highlights Edina Arts and Culture Commission September 23, 2014 Voting for People's. Choice Awards ends Sept. 30th. Please vote today if you haven't already done so. And if you're one of the ones who voted for more than one sculpture, please fill out another ballot. Winners will be announced at the Oct. 7th City Council Meeting. A reminder for anyone who wants to attend the Forecast Public Art Breakfast Scrambler with a panel of the top three experts on the topic of Percentage for Art Ordinances, please let me know so I can make sure you're registered for the event, Wednesday, Oct. 8th, 8 to 10:30 a.m. at the McKnight Foundation, 710 S 2nd St # 400, Minneapolis. Thomas, Kitty and I attended Vision Edina, a two- evening community process to update the long -term vision for the City of Edina. City leaders believe Vision Edina will serve as an important foundation for other strategic efforts such as the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Plans. The first of several planned sessions, it was attended by about 120 leaders, city staff and volunteers. . .ee separate handout about the Percentage for Arts Report to the City Council. I am asking for a vote to have this sent/presented to them. Barbara La Valleur Public Art Edina Chair Vision for a Community Building for the Arts v Prepared by The Edina Arts & Culture Commission Wv� �- December 2014 �A Over the last several years, there have been a number of initiatives in the city and community looking at ways to improve and enhance space for artistic and cultural activities in Edina. In 2007, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was written to expand the existing Art Center and allow the facility to meet all Americans with Disabilities Act and current building codes. In 2011, with the support of the Art Center Board and Edina City Council, the Arts and Culture Working Group was formed. A survey of local arts offerings was performed by the working group and two interns producing a 31- page inventory of Edina artistic and cultural organizations and performance spaces. At nearly the same time, the Grandview initiative held focus group meetings with stake holders in arts and culture to identify needs and opportunities for a new public building at the former public works site. In 2012, the city hired Consultant George Sutton of Sutton and Associates to evaluate the Edina Art Center. In 2013 Southdale approached the city with the idea of utilizing the top floor of Southdale for the Art Center. A common theme running through all of these initiatives is the realization that there is a lack of space available for artistic and cultural activities. I Inventory and Analysis Background A number of surveys and polls have been conducted looking at the perceived need and willingness to pay for a community building for the arts in Edina. These surveys are typically of a general nature and the statistical results depend very much on the type of questions asked. As part of the Grandview process conducted by The Cunningham Group, round table discussions were conducted involving about two dozen people connected to the arts in a professional capacity; ranging from art consultants to art center directors to members of the Walker Art Center staff. The goal was to gain some ideas on what is desirable and feasible for a community building at the Grandview site. This roundtable inspired the formation of the Arts and Culture Working Group and later to the formal establishment of the Edina Arts and Culture Commission in May 2013. In the summer of 2012, the Arts & Culture Working Group performed an inventory of artistic and cultural activities and venues in Edina. With city support of two interns, interviews were conducted with more than 100 Edina residents. These individuals were actively involved in artistic or cultural activities, both commercial and non - commercial, to gain an understar of the "scene" in Edina. The goal was not to come up with a statistically relevant survey but to identify needs, wants and obstacles for the arts and cultural community in the city. Summary of Inventory and Survey The inventory identified 11 artistic disciplines represented in Edina, including music, dance, theater, decorative arts, painting, culinary arts, ceramics, sculpture, literature, media arts and public art. In addition, a number of arts spaces were identified owned and administered mainly by the school district. A study of the spaces confirmed common concerns voiced by interviewees: the spaces in Edina are very difficult to rent and program. In addition, they are up to 36% more expensive than comparable space in neighboring communities. The survey identified four major areas of concern and opportunity to improve the Edina arts community: need for a community space for the arts in Edina, review of city ordinances limiting artistic growth, centralized communication of all artistic and cultural endeavors, and a strong connection for residents to artists and the arts. By far the most pressing concern is the lack of arts spaces in the city, including a performing arts space, followed by communication and awareness of information and a desire for greater connection to the city and other artists. Based on the inventory and survey we have defined a preliminary set of requirements for a community building for the arts and culture described in more detail in the following sections. Note: All photos are from the intemet and are in the public domain. Edina Arts and Culture Commission / Page 2 li i. December 2014 I y - lt� 04 1 r I Community Building for the Arts ENGAGED. VIBRANT. FORWARD. The Edina Center for Arts and Culture prepares for the future with our mission to build a vibrant community, foster common bonds, nurture talent, and create venues for expressing and appreciating arts and culture in Edina. A treasured community asset transforms for future generations. +e C C " Y� f; AA. Sh- Edina Arts and Culture Commission / Page 3 A Community Building for the Arts General Requirements A building that is: • Inviting and accessible. Uplifting with thoughtful design. A center for artistic and cultural education and events. • Architecturally stimulating, contemplative, energetic, inspiring. • Designed for multi - generational activities and serviced with public transportation, convenient parking, and access. • Green and LEED certified and solar energy. • Multi- functional spaces for people to create art, socialize, study, and dine. • Safe personal storage and flexible facility storage. Meeting /Multi- Purpose Space. Performance and Visual Arts Education Space Open, airy, multi -use 1,500 sf. spaces with an educational and rehearsal focus. (Three spaces 4,500 sf.) Individual and Visiting Artist Studio Space Intimate, sky -lit studios with sinks, storage, regular and hazardous waste disposal, ventilations and windows (4,500 sf). Rentable studio space of varying sizes for visiting and individual artists. Studio spaces totaling (2,500 sf). Class Rooms Open, sky -lit studios for painting, drawing, and multi -media programming (4,000 sf). Community Oven and Cafe Working with local business owners to establish a 2,000 — 3,000 sf. cafe connecting our community with education on cooking and the food we eat through the firing of a community oven. Teen Hangout A space for teenagers for after - school gatherings with food, ideas, and culture. Gallery and Art Gift Shop A stunning gallery and associated retail shop with storage with space requirements of 3,000 to 3,500 sf. The flexible exhibition space would be used for performance, dance, and recital space, with wedding and event rental availability. Edina Arts and Culture Commission / Page 4 A Community Building for the Arts, cont. Pottery Studio A modern, state -of- the -art pottery studio to allow creation in an attractive, bright, ergonomically organized environment. Rooms are separated into wet -clay, glazing, and finishing studios. All rooms have ventilation, floor drains, and raised, rolling shelving for wet cleaning, with an environment of abundant natural and non - natural lighting, large working tables and large sink and storage areas. Community Meeting and Multi- Purpose Space • Two rooms for lectures, community meetings, readings, rehearsals, small performances, etc. (1,500 sf.) • Space that has the flexibility to hold 20 seated or 50 standing individuals in 750 to 1,500 square feet. Utilities and Infrastructure • A green, LEED certified space for safety, accessibility, and enjoyment. Size The current Edina Art Center is 10,150 sf. Our vision proposes to at least double the space requirements to between 20,000 to 30,000 sf. Next Steps • Evaluation of current artistic and cultural programming using 2012 Arts & Culture Working Group inventory as a starting point • Obtain professional advice in the area of artistic and cultural community building • Validate space estimates with a pro -forma for space usage and requirements • Commission a feasibility analysis and business plan. • Hire a consultant with an entrepreneurial track record of creating successful artistic and cultural enterprises • Work closely with appropriate City of Edina Departments on the project • Identify potential partners and tenants. Examples such as the Edina Chorale, Greater MN Youth Orchestra, performing companies of theater and dance Edina Arts and Culture Commission CAKE -V /Culture and Arts Keep Edina Vibrant 5555 Street Address, City, ST 55555 1 ph 555.555.5555 1 N 555.555.555 www.edinaartsandculture.com I email(a)CAKE -V.com Edina Arts and Culture Commission I Page 5 Edina Art and Culture Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Community Room Edina City Hall October 23, 2014 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Chair Meifert called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O'Dea, and Steve Suckow. Commissioners Absent: Hafed Bouassida and Thomas Raeuchle. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center; and Susan Faus, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation; and William Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager. Student Representatives Present: Sophia Munic and Jack Ready. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair Meifert noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. No additions to the agenda voiced. Motion by Commissioner O'Dea and seconded by Commissioner Suckow that the Arts and Culture Commission pprove the October 23, 2014 Agenda as presented. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O'Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes— Regular Meeting of September 23, 2014 B. General Manager's Report C. Music in Edina Working Group D. Public Art Working Group Chair Meifert asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 23, 2014. It was noted on page three, the third paragraph, it should state, "Commissioner &is Miller..." On page three, Item E, the second paragraph, the second sentence, it should state, "...is af► a..." On page four, the following sentence should be removed, " veal +e be a .e.d by the Fell !`e.,,.,.,7 «4.,., " Motion by Commissioner La Valleur and seconded by Commissioner O'Dea that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O'Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. V. Community Comment No comments made. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Grandview — Bill Neuendorf, Economic Developer for the City of Edina Mr. Frey introduced Bill Neuendorf, the Economic Development Manager for the City of Edina. Mr. Neuendorf stated that he is working to develop presentations and will appear before the Council later in the year describing a formal relationship with the developer to work in partnership to develop what will be built at the Grandview site. He noted that a portion of the 3.5 acre site will be privately owned while a portion will be publicly owned, explaining that the privately owned portion will assist in funding the publicly owned portion. He reported that there will be an informational gathering on Thursday, December 4th, to discuss the project noting that all options are on the table at this point. Commissioner La Valleur questioned the time and place of the meeting. Mr. Neuendorf stated that he does not have a formal time set until Council approval is obtained. He believed the meeting would most likely take place at either 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. or 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. He advised that discussion on this process began several years ago and has included ideas such as an art center, performing arts space, fitness and wellness, senior programming, and general community programming. Mr. Frey stated that he will forward the vision for community building the Commission developed in order to provide additional input. Mr. Neuendorf stated that once the date is formalized for the meetings he would forward that information to the. Commissioners. B. Edina Vision for a Community Building Mr. Frey stated that Commissioners Miller and La Valleur have been working to amend the document and stated that he would distribute the amended version to the Commission in a few weeks. C. Grandview Committee Mr. Frey stated that he had emailed the Commissioners with potential dates for a meeting and advised that once he determines the date that works best for the majority of the Commission he would setup the meeting. It was the consensus of the Commission to hold the meeting on the evening of November 6, 2014 from 7:00 to 8:30 p.m. Mr. Frey stated that he will book the meeting and will also send an invitation out to members of the Art Center mailing list along with members of the Music in Edina and Public Art working groups. He noted that he will advise the Commissioners of the location but believed the meeting would be held at City Hall. D. Ways & Means Committee Mr. Frey stated that he and Ms. Faus just attended the second working group meeting to discuss the City donation policy and advised that the City Council will review that information at their first meeting in November and he would provide an update to the Commission at their November meeting. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Meifert asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Commissioner Comments Commissioner La Valleur referenced the Public Art Scramble that she, Commissioner O'Dea, and Mr. Frey recently attended and provided an update. She stated that after leaving the event she believed that Edina would not want a percentage for the art ordinance, Commissioner O'Dea and Mr. Frey agreed. She explained that it is very complex and more complicated than the benefit that would be received. She clarified that Minneapolis does not have a percentage for the art ordinance. Mr. Frey stated that Saint Paul spoke in a hindsight view and stated that in looking back they would not have chosen to move forward down that path towards the ordinance. Commissioner O'Dea stated that those who have the ordinance have found it to be too constrictive and stated that there were other methods to obtain the same result. Commissioner La Valleur noted that she could ask the Saint Paul Public Art Director to speak to the Commission at a meeting in order to provide alternative options. Edina Art and Culture Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Community Room November 20, 2014 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Commissioner O'Dea called the meeting to order at 4:34 p.m. It was noted that no quorum was present, so no action would take place. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Barbara La Valleur, Anne Miller, Kitty O'Dea, and Steve Suckow. Commissioners Absent: Hafed Bouassida, Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Ray Meifert, Thomas Raeuchle. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center; and Susan Faus, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation; and William Neuendorf, Economic Development Director. Students Representatives Present: Jack Ready - V. Community Comment No comments made. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Grandview Committee Mr. Neuendorf referenced the location of a City owned property, noting that the initial public Exploration Session will be held on December 4`h. He advised of activity that occurred in the past and stated that at this point the focus is on a smaller scale, rather than large scope ideas. He stated that the session will be very interactive and a small group format — -will be used. He stated that through this process more details will be obtained. He stated that there will be large sessions, smaller sessions are available, and noted that the staff could also attend a meeting of this Commission to partake in that discussion. He stated that January, February and March will be the main months for public input, noting that a discovery session will be held on March 11 n to discover which aspects will fit together for this project. He stated that an open house will be held approximately one month later in order to present two to four real ideas for the site. Commissioner O'Dea stated that this process has been followed three times and questioned what was done with data. Mr. Neuendorf stated that while input is always good, the first three groups asked very general questions. He stated that at this point, a general direction has been selected and the smaller details need to be determined. He stated that those previous events were not intended to result in an actual project, whereas this process will result in a project. He described the flow of the meetings, which will include small groups identifying strengths and weaknesses as well as keypad voting on possible ideas. lommissioner Miller stated that perhaps it would be best to identify a spokesperson for the Commission at the public :ploration session. Jack Ready stated that it would-also be great to obtain the input of students for this project. He advised of an opportunity that may be available during collaborative time or possibly the creation of a focus group. Mr. Neuendorf thanked the group for their time and hoped to see the group at the December meeting. He stated that he will work with Mr. Frey to get this item on an upcoming agenda for the Commission as well. B. Public Art Report Mr. Neuendorf referenced the area of 50th and France and reported that about $4,000,000 has been put into renewing the, ramps. He thanked those, including Mr. Frey and Commissioner La Valleur, for their input in regard to the artistic aspects for the project. Commissioner La Valleur referenced the new art utility box wrap that was recently completed and provided pictures. She stated that the cost was $500, which was a great deal. She commended the installers for their high attention to detail. She advised of a donation in the amount of $5,000 that will be received for public art. She stated that Edina resident Judy Stewart is interested in joining the Public Art Working Group and advised that she will ask for a vote to accept that membership the following month when a quorum is present. C. Edina Vision Update Mr. Frey stated that he has been attempting to wrap his head around the Vision for the community building. He stated that the feeling is different this time in the process and he would very much like to see a center for arts as a part of the project. He believed that something smart and strategic should be put forward as a concept. He referenced the photograph on the Vision, acknowledging that the image was simply taken from Google, but believed that a more concrete idea should be set forth. He desired the development of a team of individuals to work on this over the next few months in order to put something strong forward. He stated that he plans on attending all of the public meetings and asked that as many Commissioners as possible attend the December 4th session. D. Parks Strategic Planning Process Ms. Faus advised that the Parks Department is undergoing a strategic planning process and stated that a special meeting has been set for December 101h from 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. at City Hall. She stated that a consultant will be running the meeting in order to obtain artistic input. VII. Correspondence and Petitions None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Commissioner Comments No comments. IX. Staff Comments No comments. X. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Commissioner Ellis stated that during the research process there was a discussion regarding encouraging a contribution during new development rather than the use of the word ordinance. Commissioner La Valleur stated that she believed that it would be worth pursuing the idea in another direction, such as reating a tradition where the City could ask for participation from new developers in regard to public art. Mr. Frey stated that the City began funding public art in 2007 with a contribution of $7,500 and now donates $10,000 annually, similar to what began this past year with Music in Edina. Commissioner O'Dea noted that the conversation at the Scramble was quite brief and believed that it would be beneficial to continue a discussion with some of the individuals they spoke with. Commissioner La Valleur stated that perhaps she would attempt to book a meeting with the individuals in January. Commissioner Miller questioned if the Edina Vision document developed by the Commission would be available for the meeting for the Edina Vision Process. Mr. Frey stated that he would attempt to finalize the document and distribute to the Commission in a few weeks and hoped that any feedback would be provided prior to the November meeting. He stated that once finalized he would distribute to Mr. Neuendorf and advised that the City Council would see the document through the minutes of this Commission. Chair Meifert commended those involved in the Juried Art Show, which was recently hosted and questioned how the event could be made larger in the future. Commissioner Lappin stated that the idea of transporting the art has made the group hesitant to host the event at another location. Chair Meifert referenced a museum in his alma mater home town that hosts a harvest home dinner each year, charging $125 per person, which is a great fundraising event. He advised that the food is donated from local restaurants and believed that could be a great idea for fundraising for arts and culture. Mr. Frey stated that the group has discussed the idea of a gala for the past several years. .:ommissioner La Valleur provided another fundraising idea that could include a tour of homes in the area that have a lovely art collection, where admission would be charged. IX. Staff Comments Mr. Frey stated that due to the holidays the meetings for November and December would be moved to the third Thursday of each month and advised that he would also advise the Commission of the location as the Community Room would not be available. He noted that the Commission could also choose to cancel a meeting around the holidays. He advised that the January meeting would be held in the Council Chambers and would be televised. He reported that the Rockin' Hollywoods have been booked for the February 14th Music in Edina event at Braemar Golf Course. X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner La Valleur and seconded by Commissioner O'Dea that the Art and Culture Commission adjourn the meeting at 5:31 p.m. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O'Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. •/,wado.id aqz jo ap!s ginos aqa uo XEMan!.ap E Aq passaaaE 'jooa lieg E qi!m jg2iaq u! /,jols -euo 'a$EaE$ payJE33E AEJ -Z E sEy Alaua.i.ana `SZ61 ui paianzsuoa aiXas JEnlnad lEluolo:) E 'awoq 2ulls!xa a41 •anuany laxaad }o >laolq OOSI' aqi jo ap!s isam aqi uo paIEaol si kwadwd aaafgns aqi 3 qi pau!Eldxa Ad aauuEId 92E."B3 payD7240a MON - anuand 19x9.1(] O ZSt, 01-P I -H 'Z ssaua4 -e!ado.iddd ;o •d SNOI1tlaN3WWO73b18 SlaOd3a 'IA •alEpdn aqj joj jjopuanaN •.JI„ I pa>luugz paEoq a4l '1aafo.id aqj aoj }}o- ila!l E aq II!m 4a!4m a93ua:) Aa!unwwo:) Eu!P3 ayl TE 4-,V jagwaaaa uo sluana WawaMua a!lgnd a4:1 }o Is-19 aqj puanE of paEoq 941 paj!nu! popuanaN 'JW 'sa2Ens 3au12s1p j1eJanas 10 IsISUOJ II!M puE indu! Aa!unwwoa an1sua:1xa apnlau! II!m ssaao -id Su!uuEld al!s ayl TEP papPE DH '91!s 9J:)e E•£ ayl J01 sasn ajEn!jd puE a!lgnd }o uo!iEuigwoa isaq 041 aulwJazap of AP ayl 4:1!m d!ysaauajEd u! liom 11!m gngsuanLjj •ai!s aqi ao} jaujjEd :ivawdolanapa.a aqi sE paiaalas seem dnojE) 93IM3 IEad lElaaawwoD gngsuanEa3 1Eyj $u!ulEldxa 'salj!nljaE wowdolanapaa s,az!s s>laom a!lgnd JUEJEA a43 uo anpdn uE 42!m paEoq aqi pap!Ao id aaSEueW auawdolanad :)!wouoa3. s,EU!P3 'popuanaN IN a ;!S sal ioM 3!lgnd W723'eA - AOSIBMW :juauadolana(3 :)luaouo33 1popuonaN II!8 1N3WWO7 AliNf1WW0:) 'A -pap.in uo!:jow ayl 'DAE Palon IId •u0130w a41 papuoaas uEll9gal„1.i9gwal„1 •uEwssnS aagwal„! wo.al paisenbaa uo!lEaU!aEla ay; apnlau! oz 2uliaaw V I OZ I aagolap aqa wojj sainu!w aqi 1.0 IEnoaddE panow aaool„ ! jagwaW •uo!ssnas!p yo:) anuany uap.ay SZgV aqj Sulanp £ aSEd uo sjuawwoa s!y jo uoljEaU!.aEla E jo} palsE uEwssnS jagwal„I tiIOZ lip aago ;30 S31f1NIW 31-11:10 1dAOUddV .'AI •palaaej u0110w ayl '@Ae paJon 11V - uo! ;ow aqj papuoias uellalaW jagwaw -epuaSe Su!laaw ayj ano.idde 01 panow uau8,o aagwaW VaN3DV 9N1133W :10 -IVAObddti '111 •L,Ada,! a:)dof '.iauuEld ao!uaS sm juasaid jjEiS tsauzp puE uEwilanad 'uaijg,p 'uasumispgD 'wollal„! 'uElla-!aw 'uEwssnS 1ajool„1 's iagwaW puE aagaM .J[EgD sEM IIEa Ilo.a 2u!aamsuv 'I"1W) -I1Oa III 'W'd OO :L b3a2IO 01 -I-IV:) '1 'Lu'd OO :L ti I OZ `01 aagwanoN 'AlepuoW s.iaquaie47 1!:)uno:) — IIEH AD 'eulP3 p-0E08 u0141ewaas9ad aSIPPOI -I leulP3 aye ;o Sul ;aaW aaInSoU S3.LnNIW Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 The COA request entails the construction of a new detached,garage on the south side of the rear yard. The project also includes converting the attached garage to two stories of living space which is not visible from the street facade; thus not subject to the COA approval. The proposed 572 square foot 2 -car detached garage measures 22' x 26' feet in area. Access to the garage will be obtained on the east elevation from the existing driveway where two overhead doors and two windows in the gable area are proposed. A service door and window are provided on the north elevation. The rear elevation includes a gable vent and two windows. The south elevation lacks architectural detailing because that side of the proposed garage abuts a tall privacy fence. Ms. Repya pointed out that the design of the structure is proposed to complement the Colonial Revival style of the home with hardi lap siding (existing on the home) and asphalt shingles. All dimensions proposed for the structure are consistent with the surrounding detached garages and new garages, previously approved by the HPB through the COA process. Although not subject to the COA approval, Ms. Repya shared plans for the conversion of the attached garage to living space at the rear of the home for the Board's information. The footprint of the existing 440 square foot attached garage conversion will increase to 625 square feet of living space, an additional 180 square feet; two- stories in height. - The new living space has been designed to provide a compatible use of the home while at the same time maintain the home's overall historic character, utilizing the same hardi -plank siding and asphalt shingles as the original home. Ms. Repya explained that the neighbor to the north (4522 Drexel Avenue) submitted a comment objecting to the height and length of the proposed addition, concerned that it will block their sunlight, daylight and views. Ms. Repya pointed out that the plans for the addition provide for a second story that is inset 2.5 feet from the first floor providing the requested articulation to the design; and meeting the zoning ordinance criteria for building design and lot coverage. Furthermore, the design is similar to other projects reviewed in the district which have received COA approval. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel evaluated the proposed plans and provided a written opinion citing that the existing attached garage is not a significant historic, character defining architectural feature; and its removal will not result in the destruction or alteration of any important architectural element. Because the proposed new construction will be located on the back of the existing house and will match the essential architectural character of the 1925 home, it should not have an adverse effect on the historic character of the streetscape. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 Furthermore, the remodeling project as demonstrated has been common throughout the Country Club Districts, is considered a historically appropriate rehabilitation treatment. Planner Repya concluded that the proposed detached garage is consistent with new garages previously reviewed in the district and conversion of the attached garage to living space has been routinely included in COA applications previously approved, thus approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request is recommended subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque be installed on the exterior of the new detached garage.. Findings supporting the recommendation include: The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the proposed projects. The proposed detached garage will complement the architectural style of the home and not be detrimental to the adjacent historic structures. The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Applicant Representative: Available to respond to questions - Ryan Thuftdahl, rt Design Zach & Kelley Burnett, owners Zach Burnett, 4524 Drexel Avenue addressed the northerly neighbors comments regarding the height and length of the addition abutting their shared property line, stating that he had a conversation with the neighbor about his concerns, and while Mr. Burnett can empathize, the proposed plans have been vetted by two architects, meet the zoning ordinance criteria, and will not be visible from the street. Furthermore, the two -story addition meets the needs of his family, and upholds the historic integrity of the neighborhood. Public Comments: None A brief discussion ensued amongst the board, agreeing that the plans were an enhancement to the home. Motion: Member Moore moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque be installed on the exterior of the garage. Member O'Brien seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 2. H-14-11 4901 Bruce Avenue - Change to street facing fa4pades Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the southeast corner of Bruce Avenue and Country Club Road. The home, constructed in 1934 is a Colonial Revival style with an attached one story 2 -car garage accessed from the north on Country Club Road. The homeowners initially received a COA in 2012 for an addition to the rear of the home which faces Country Club Road. Construction of the approved plans never occurred, and they are now requesting approval of a new plan which entails changes to the Country Club Road facade on the north side; and the Bruce Avenue front facade on the west side of the property. The plans proposed for the north side of the home call for converting a portion of the existing attached garage to living space, expanding the attached garage 12 feet to the east, and adding a second story master suite over the garage fronting Country Club Road. A new curb cut will be required east of the existing driveway due to the relocation of the garage. The previous plan approved in 2012 included an addition to the rear of the home which expanded the home's footprint and reduced the livability of the rear yard. Changes to the front facade of the home propose removing the partial brick . surrounding the front entrance and adding a flat- roofed front entry portico projecting 4 feet from the front building wall, with fluted columns and crown molding. The plans also call for replacing the existing aluminum siding with cedar lap siding; adding flat board banding at the second story overhang on the front elevation and continuing along the mid - section of the home; and installing new windows and doors. It is the intention of this project to address the home's issues of disrepair, provide additional living spaces to meet the needs of the homeowner, and add traditional Colonial style elements which are currently lacking. Preservation Consultant Vogel provided a written evaluation where he pointed out that the proposed renovation project will reverse the adverse effects of physical deterioration as well as previous remodeling work while preserving those architectural elements which are important to the house's historic character. The plans also show an attempt to modify the house to give it a more "traditional" Colonial Revival character. The inappropriate aluminum siding will be replaced with wood lap siding and some relatively minor structural alterations are also proposed, including a small addition on the rear elevation. All of the existing windows will be replaced. The applicant has strived to rehabilitate the exterior of the house in conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's standards for the treatment of historic properties. The proposed 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 work requires minimal alteration of the building structure and the distinguishing original qualities of the house (its two -story form, symmetrical facade, side - gabled roof, balanced pattern of fenestration, and accentuated front entry door) will not be destroyed. No significant character defining architectural details will be removed or obscured. The proposed rear addition, new front entry, the cedar lap siding, and composition shingle roofing will not alter the essential character of the house. The applicant proposes to slightly alter the architectural character of the facade to create a more picturesque appearance —in other words, to make the house more closely resemble Country Club colonials built in the 1920s. Mr. Vogel pointed out that one of the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation recommends against alterations "which seek to create an earlier appearance" however, the proposed facade changes do not rise to the level of a fundamental change to the architectural character of the house. The house is not architecturally significant; none of the distinguishing original design qualities of the house will be lost as a result of the proposed renovation; and its association with Thorpe's original plan of development (including the design controls incorporated in the original covenants) will be preserved intact. Planner Repya concluded that she agreed with Mr. Vogel's evaluation of the project and recommended approval of the COA request subject to the plans presented. Findings supporting the approval recommendation include: • The proposed renovation project will reverse the adverse effects of physical deterioration as well as previous remodeling work while preserving those architectural elements which are important to the house's historic character. • No significant historic architectural features or fabric of the home will be destroyed. • The proposed alterations are compatible with the historic character of the house. • The plans provided clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Applicant Representatives: Available to respond to questions - Mark & Kristina Dietzen, 4901 Bruce Avenue Homeowner, Mark Dietzen explained that they were returning to the HPB with a revised plan because the 2012 approved plan included an addition to the rear yard as well as a second story addition over the garage. They determined that the green space in the rear yard was too valuable, thus preferred the addition be limited to the second story over the garage. He added that the removal of a large concrete patio in the rear yard will also enhance the green space they so value. Public Comments: None Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 Board Discussion: Student Member Otness commented that he thought the addition looked very nice and he would support the project. Student Member Druckman agreed with Member Otness, adding that he believed the proposed changes did a good job of accentuating the Colonial style of the home. Member McLellan wondered if the amount of deterioration of the original siding (underneath the aluminum siding) had been determined. Homeowner, Mark Dietzen responded that they have not evaluated the materials underneath the aluminum siding. Member Mellom commented that the project was nice, but she wondered if the two front windows were going to be enlarged. Homeowner, Kristina Dietzen responded that all of the replacement windows will be the same size as the original windows. Member Moore observed that the original home looks as though it was built in the 1950's, not 1934, and he believed the proposed plan currently under consideration was an improvement for the property. Member Sussman stated that he sat on the HPB when the 2012 plan was approved and he found the revised plan currently under consideration to be much better suited to the property. Member Christiaansen pointed out that she liked the summary of the project provided by the applicant - finding it to be very informative and well thought out. Motion: Member Sussman moved approval of the COA request for changes to the street facing fa4ades of the home subject to the plans presented. Member Moore seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion Carried. VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. 4505 Arden Avenue - Construction Update Planner Repya reported that a Certificate of Appropriateness was approved for 4505 Arden Avenue on March 11, 2014. The application included the following activities and was subject to the plans dated 3 -4 -14: • Building a new detached garage • Converting the attached garage to living space; and rebuilding the substandard rear addition • Changes to the street facing fagade of the home. As the project commenced, major problems with the existing foundation became apparent warranting an evaluation by a structural engineer and David Fisher, the city's chief building ll Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 official — both agreed that "The foundation walls were not in acceptable condition, were inadequately constructed and were performing poorly "; consequently, Mr. Fisher determined that the footing and foundation needed to be replaced due to the deficiencies. Ms. Repya reminded that board that in 2010, Steve Kirchman, the chief building official evaluated a structural engineer's report and determined that "I do have concerns about the structural integrity of the foundation........., but I don't know the extent of damage to the foundation at 4505 Arden Avenue." The most recent engineer's report dated October 7, 2014, provided more definitive information regarding the inadequacy of the foundation that substantiated Mr. Kirchman' s concerns. Planner Repya explained that the change in building process was not referred back to the HPB for consideration because the building plans for the home have not changed, and life- safety issues are not subject to HPB approval - the decision was collaborative between the chief building official, community development director, Planner Repya and Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel. This project would have been referred back to the HPB if the plans for the house had changed, but that is not the case. The building permit for the new home is subject to the plans approved by the HPB. Ms. Repya concluded that from the onset, this project has been required to follow the more stringent procedures for a tear -down as outlined in the city's new "Construction Management Plan" (CMP) because the addition that was being demolished comprised more than 50% of the home's wall & roof area. The CMP required notification and a meeting with interested neighbors within 300 feet of the property, signage identifying the project with telephone numbers as well as more restrictive times for construction activity. Mr. Busyn also installed his company sign which is allowed. Board Member Comments: Board members shared their surprise and disappointment that they had not been informed about the problems which had arisen with. the foundation /footings of the home at 4505 Arden Avenue. They agreed that they should have had the opportunity to review the situation prior to the tear down of the entire home. They also expressed disappointment that there was no notification to the surrounding neighbors or the HPB prior to demolition. Member Mellom reviewed the history of the COA process for 4505 Arden Avenue dating back from 2010; and provided the board with copies of the City Council's Resolution from April 22, 2014 denying her appeal of the HPB's approval of the COA for changes to the home which had been approved on March 11, 2014. Ms. Mellom pointed out that the Council did not approve a demolition of the home. She added that she had been in the basement of the home and the foundation looked just fine. Ms. Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 Mellom further opined that Scott Busyn is too cozy with the city planners; and she questioned the validity of the structural engineer's report - surmising that it was biased since Mr. Busyn paid for that report. Chair Weber responded to Ms. Mellom by explaining that the problems with the home's foundation and footings surfaced once the .exterior of the foundation down to the footings was unearthed. An interior inspection of the foundation would not provide enough information to evaluate the integrity of the system. Member O'Brien questioned how the decision was made to allow for a teardown of the historic home without notifying the HPB or the surrounding neighbors. He took issue with the chief building official's letter explaining his evaluation of the structural engineer's report supporting the demolition of the home; and stated that he did not believe life safety concerns were applicable since the house was not inhabited. Mr. O'Brien concluded that he did not want the HPB to be ambushed in the future, stressing the need to address this issue properly; and move forward in a positive fashion. Member Moore stated that he believed the HPB should have been informed that problems had arisen with the home's foundation prior to the demolition. Since it is the board members who are out in the community, they need to be equipped with up -to -date information in order to field questions from the public, such as "I thought that house wasn't going to be torn down....How could that happen ?" Mr. Moore pointed out that the construction update memo provided the information that the board should have received prior to the demolition; and the issue should have been brought to the HPB. Perhaps the outcome would have been the same, but at least there would have been no surprises. Member Christiaansen observed that HPB members aren't structural engineers and if a report is received indicating that a system is failing, there needs to be a path to deal with that information - currently there doesn't appear to be a procedure in place. She added that the COA was issued with the understanding that portions of the existing home were to remain. If the inferior foundation and footings required that none of the existing home could remain, the HPB should have been allowed to be part of the discussion. Member McLellan agreed with Member Christiaansen, pointing out that when the scope of a COA changes, the HPB should be involved and criteria should be established to address such situations. Student Members ®ruckman and Otness agreed that the HPB should have had the opportunity to discuss the problems with the foundation prior to the demolition of the home. Member Sussman observed that a structural engineer is licensed and they are obligated to report what they find. The most recent structural engineer's report has proven that 4505 Arden Avenue has been a neglected property, and structurally it may well have been among the 9 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 worst in the district. However, the fact that the entire house was torn down without HPB or surrounding neighbors being notified is a serious issue. He suggested that the board look upon what has happened as an opportunity to establish procedures and standards to provide an open and objective evaluation of problems when they arise. Whatever is devised can become a guide for applicants, the HPB and city staff to be better prepared when dealing with an unexpected situation. Mr. Sussman concluded that the sign displayed at 4505 Arden Avenue still reads "Demolition /Renovation ", and he asked that Mr. Busyn remove the word "Renovation ". Community Comment: Dan Dulas, 4609 Bruce Avenue stated that he appreciated the concerns and comments expressed by the HPB. He added that a COA was approved for a plan that did not include the teardown of the entire historic home; and any changes to that plan should have come back to the HPB and the public should have been informed as well. He added that he looked forward to the board establishing some procedures so the teardown of 4505 Arden Avenue doesn't set an unwanted precedence in the future. Chair Weber observed that there was a lack of communication regarding the decision to tear down the historic home because there are currently no procedures in place to address the situation. He summarized the board's request for staff to evaluate the steps that were taken in the decision to allow the demolition of the.home without input from the HPB, and come back to the December meeting with suggestions to establish notification procedures and assurances the HPB will be included in the discussion before any action is taken. . B. 2014 Human Services Task Force Report - Member Mellom Member Mellom explained that she is currently one of three community representatives serving on the 2014 Human Services Task Force who are challenged with deciding how $86,000 of public funds should be distributed to eight requesting public service agencies. She pointed out that the task force interviewed all the agencies and she found them to be an impressive group. The total amount of funds requested was $118,000, which created a challenge to determine how to fairly distribute the monies to make up the $32,000 difference. She concluded that a final recommendation for funding will be provided to the City Council, and she has found the experience to be most rewarding. The board thanked Ms. Mellom for serving on the task force. C. Election of Officer: - Vice Chair Vacancy Chair Weber called for nominations to the office of Vice Chair. Member Mellom moved to nominate Member Christiaansen. Member Christiaansen accepted the nomination. Member Moore seconded the motion. No further nominations were received. Chair Weber then called for a vote. All voted aye. The motion carried for Member Christiaansen to serve as the Vice Chair of the HPB. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None 4 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes November 10, 2014 IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Sussman explained that several years ago he served on the first community working group evaluating the entire 30 acre Grandview commercial area which includes the vacant public works site Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager talked about earlier in the meeting. Sussman explained that his early interest in the area centered on its rich history which includes the Dan Patch railroad line, Tupa Park which houses the Cahill School and Grange Hall, and the original homestead of the Yancey family. He pointed out that some of his interest in the area may be more related to the activities of the Historical Society than the HPB; however the public engagement sessions now being offered provide a big opportunity to get involved because after several years of discussion, things are going to start happening. Mr. Sussman concluded that he encouraged his fellow board members to become engaged in the process too. X. STAFF COMMENTS - None XI. NEXT MEETING DATE December 9, 2014 Xll. ADJOURNMENT 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 10 HERITAGE PRESERVATION; Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum BOARD _ NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session #'of'Mtgs. Attendance ,% Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 100% Birdman, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 46% Christiaansen, Jennifer 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 77% Mellom, Joyce 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 92% Moore, Bob 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 100% Sussman, Peter 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 92% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/20171 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 92% McDermott, Connie 2/1/2016 1 1 8% O'Brien, Tim 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 77% Weber, Ryan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 92% Brandt, Andrew student 1 1 2 15% Johnson, Nathan student I I 1 0 0% Druckman, Joe student 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Otness, Peter student 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically: INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type 1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. 'A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. NOTES: NAME D/u\/ R77ooSIt ADDRESS �l o y d,4 r, L-"q w T� TOPIC 9 )-"J 4 F-Im Lt 6 L--7- �t NAME �Jan-\ Ci, ADDRESS 1 TOPIC�/l/ s NAME \� 1 "nucc NAME TrW PaU 1510r) ADDRESS Ave-, TOPIC L'1 v ; vA p, 9-�r e e +5 Play) IN NAME ADDRESS � 1coj�(Z>� ll�- TOPIC NAME ADDRESS TOPIC /\6 NAME ADDRESS--)(�O-2-YOKk, Vvj TOPIC ����o4 O�x &�,,_ c, �� � NAME ""A '-,] CI,Vt a U ADDRESS TOPIC S c c v`e cq- I uj Vat vv c f S f-e� S NAME 0aAtU-- a, ADDRESS 6 /1y i3k-e , j,, j TOPIC o rj L-�, o r� 2 NAME 94—XK ADDRESS ` ?0 ©y Al %sty/ &W TOPIC Zou�dr .� l�lE� ,Ton; Situ Si,o, /�e core s�e4/ 7 A S y' eT3 r onsl go-ed }Ae "x Pi►t� NAME Ta,�P EOPQhCr ADDRESS ,� i TOPIC " NAME r ADDRESS Ave TOPIC Vy �),.` - -(f -j-Li e L� j NAME 17AIVI ADDRESS /7.3 / T /J�/ G�/ii- ��' �r• TOPIC NAME (Lj� ADDRESS �✓Ji /l�,r GIN �a�`O TOPIC l/S NAME ADDRESS PQrkplce-Ce TOPIC �✓�_V'c��A Colylm"—reT NAME \"\-V1 wn�.. ADDRESS (�O%- y OVVL(- Qv k �b 1�p TOPIC Lx °\ -V\ Ovl- S�ou S 11v t NAME to N► e CA72 i? I N J ADDRESS _J c TOPIC K,,? (-7 ash A t�, P � lI / (Pct 6.-n r1 (r S-Q NAME 13 12 U F%c't� ADDRESS S yU`/ TOPIC Pi/13C -1 C GUO lQCS ,4K/4 N v /EyW �jiST� / cT NAME ADDRESS ,Wl�)- W TOPIC rvc-a-4c- . NAME ejG 8 /�9 b ij- f �6 H L. ADDRESS �� V / L L Q , TOPIC L NAME �,9,?vu ,��Cren✓n� ADDRESS TOPIC ,c ����i ul�os �i� c�✓ /�S & Cz 4e�'i C6,1kwf /°w-s . 14(So SIGN -IN SHEET EDINA CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL MEETING Please print clearly: Name Address E -mail DECEMBER 6, 2014 � � .4 � � `.��Z''a ��17O��Ci C�l•o�� � t� V o�n � o Q_ gar,y QAKL-ALJ.N ID21�1 0.SCaIX.rlkiC0141. I if �b A POK .S 74' De I/ILLe De EDlA/A M Al Lo r �' ,lr, 0 77 55-13 aRk PC. . 3 /15 G l U U alas � V � o' l Lens / f � �' 7Si 2 dpi / VCS-6 Axy, 5b-e 4�-Ne,, .SSYO M ooh D N S i� C ��-t'N Liz I 4 $0 t JJ . (P D S� '6eve vio Cat LAIO S08 � `13 l( d1NrL_;A aq, CO►NA 7/1 ;f-w- SIGN -IN SHEET EDINA CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL MEETING DECEMBER 6, 2014 Please print clearly: KI.. bAtiracc E -mail 1-I�I�X � f C�✓'CXrC� -�J.i �Iv �I . e 1 C 1 PC, ("Ce 1A) f I i= rtn R !�-� n/ p Z CV r ,v G S S'S�(p M �- f\,, s o (y ,M cc.( SIGN -IN S ET Please print clearly: Name EDINA CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL MEETING Address E -mail DECEMBER 6, 2014 "AL211 b PA C_ovv-� FrznJ ,j ET- Susan sc (o i -Z C c- - a L� �A� ao cerort _�J/d �Ne� � �a; -��ra 1�v� J J�r� o J I "l 0 LL) Z �% l 1 S( S{ S w h v wa TYo Pa\,lsa x'11 �0 1�vpk A_ 1. A e. J V- ` 1 fir, l Cl 1✓L 7c>00 &o�I edJ vta f U)f/ sS j o6 i �Vpq A 'ii i G �11 Av&\,w I c1lc&- CcsY\5-elloch-or creme coy�,o "AL211 b PA C_ovv-� MINUTES OF THE TOWN HALL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA SENIOR CENTER APRIL 17, 2010 10:10 A.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh entered the meeting at 10:20 a.m. Mayor Hovland thanked persons for attending. He explained this was the third Edina Town Hall Meeting hosted by the Edina City Council. He noted that residents had been asked to complete a card stating their name, address and topic and he would be calling residents to speak by name. Each speaker would be allowed to have three minutes to speak on any issue or concern they wished to express. Mary Patnaude, 5705 West 66'h Street, expressed concern about the condition of streets near her home and being required to pay for the repair with very few homes on the street. She also expressed concern that her property value has gone down. The Mayor explained that all property owners both residential and commercial participate in costs when streets were rebuilt. The City Manager, Gordon Hughes, also indicated he would discuss the situation with her. Mary and Jack Ryan, 6824 Brook Drive, expressed concern about the proposed trail along 9 Mile Creek. They stated they were against the bike trail being built along the creek and noted the maps depicting the proposed alignments were not very good. Nancy Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, stated she was a member of the Community Access Team and asked if the Council would entertain alternate routes to what 3 Rivers Park District has mapped, such as along Metro Boulevard. Tim Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, urged the Council to consider alternatives to an alignment along 9 Mile Creek. Shelley Golden, 6987 Langford Court, said she opposed the bike path along the creek because it will destroy habitat. She also does not want it along Lincoln Drive because it will take too much of the, front yards. Susan Clark, 5812 West 61s' Street, expressed concern about the proposed Senior Housing along Tracy Avenue and the Crosstown. She asked for better citizen involvement in future land use decisions. Tom Bonneville, 4378 Browndale Avenue, suggested that to improve communications, a staff member be assigned to write weekly write -ups of activities in the City. These should be published in the Edina Sun Current. Bruce Kieffer, 5404 Edenmoor, expressed frustration with an on -going trash issue at a neighbor's home. He said that they had contacted Solvei Wilmot who wrote a letter and the neighbor cleaned up, but was now back to their old habits. Lois Ring, 7440 Edinborough Way, stated she was concerned about the noise potential if the proposed restaurant, Pinstripes were allowed to operate at Centennial Lakes. Donna Schoffelman, 6964 Langford Court, stated she felt due to the current economy it was not the right time to pursue the 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail. Ms. Schoffelman also did not want to see the Page 1 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /April 17. 2010 trail along Lincoln Drive because of the many access points along that street which would create safety hazards. Gail Gaumer, 5209 Lochloy Drive, expressed concern that the City was consider banning indoor wood burning fireplaces. Ms. Gaumer stated she has a wood burning fireplace with three faces in her home that cannot be converted to gas. Nancy Kuphal, 5500 McGuire Road, stated she would like to see the City undertake some deer control because of the severe damage deer do to landscaping. She saw last fall the deer control was cut from the City's budget and urged it be re- instated. Dave Henry, 5712 Creek Valley Road, stated that his neighborhood was subjected to noise from the Edina High School trash collection each morning between 5:a.m. and 6:15 a.m. He said that repeated attempts to get the trash collector or the High School to change the scheduled time had been unsuccessful. Neighbors have gotten nowhere with Dr. Locklear. Mr. Henry said that he also wanted to discuss the dangerous condition that existed on Tracy Avenue. He stated that as a bike commuter he has encountered many intersections on the curvy part of Tracy and the way the street has been striped made it a safety hazard. Mr. Henry also expressed his concern with Colonial Church's proposed project. He noted that he was a Segment Leader for the alignment review of the proposed 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail. As a bike rider Mr. Henry felt that TH62 should be crossed at either Gleason or Tracy and he has been frustrated to hear the City Council asked for an alignment on the trail. Jeff Witt, 6104 Habitat Court, expressed 'concern about the proposed Bike Trail alignment along Lincoln Drive because adding bikes will increase safety issues on this segment of road. He felt there were better alternatives that should be reviewed. Mr. Witt agreed that deer control was needed because damage from deer was a problem. Kent Gravelle, 5609 Tracy Avenue, said he was with the Colonial Church opposition and was in charge of environmental issues. Mr. Gravelle stated he had submitted a petition to the Department of Environmental Quality requesting their assistance with the impact the proposed development would have on the property. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood. Avenue, said an issue came up Thursday evening at the Transportation Commission meeting regarding the restriping of France Avenue. Ms. Janovy asked the Council to pull the item from the Council's agenda to allow further review of the issue. She urged the Council to view the Transportation Commission meeting online to hear the concerns of the Commissioners. Bruce Kieffer, 5404 Edenmoor, noted he had some luck with a product called Repelz All and suggested that might be one option to pursue to help control the deer. Gail Gaumer, 5209 Lochloy Drive, said she used a chemical free solution consisting of one teaspoon Tabasco, one tablespoon dish soap, and water mixed in a spray bottle as a deer deterant. Ms. Gaumer said spray directly on the foliage, but do not use on any vegetables that you wish to consume. She added that spraying in several places should deter deer. John Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, expressed his opposition to Pinstripes and stated that he believed letters to the City Council were not available to the public online. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Avenue, said her letter representing the League of Women Voters was never included in a Council packet. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 17, 2010 Jim Grogan, 6952 Langford Court, stated he opposed the proposed 9 Mile Creek Bike Trail. Pam Johnson, 5505 Valley Lane, asked why 3 Rivers Park District were saying the City Council was requiring 9 Mile Creek to stay albng the creek with all of their alignments and refusing to check out any other alternatives. Nancy Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, agreed stating that 3 Rivers Park District was not allowing the community groups to look at anything but the alignments 3 Rivers Park District has proposed. Bruce Kieffer, 5405 Edenmoor, thanked the Council for conducting the Town Hall meeting and stated he liked the venue at the Senior Center. Jim Landberg, 5408 Creek View Lane, asked about the future of the Southdale Center. Tim Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, asked about the impact on 9 Mile Creek, Lake Edina and Cornelia Lake when Southdale ceased using and discharging ground water to heat and cool their facility as ordered by the EPA. He expressed concern over the degradation of the bodies of water when they no longer receive the influx of water from Southdale. Tom Bonneville, 4378 Browndale Avenue, gave some history on the use of the ground water and underground holding lakes that were used in the past. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 11:33 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 4, 2010 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 3 MINUTES OF THE TOWN HALL MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA SENIOR CENTER OCTOBER 1, 2011 10:00 A.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. in the Fireside Room of the Edina Senior Center. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager and Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to allow citizens to share their views and concerns with members of the City Council in a less formal setting than during regular meetings. Sandy Fox, 5801 West 68th Street, stated Tracy Avenue needed to be rebuilt especially near 70th Street and Valley View Road. Kay Bach, 6625 Dakota Trail, Valley View Road, needs a sidewalk, the vegetation has overgrown the roadway causing sight problems. Jessica Hines 6608 Ridgeview Drive asked what the status of the Dan Patch Rail lines. Ms. Hines expressed concern if there were to be increased rail traffic and asked would homeowners be advised of plans or compensated for lost market value of their homes. Bruce Kieffer, 5404 Edenmoor Street, agreed that the future of the rail line was a great concern if the traffic on the line increased. Bill Donnelly, 6209 Parkwood Road, expressed concern that the City only realized $27,000 /year from the State of Minnesota for the traffic enforcement on State Highways. He indicated it did not make sense to spend City tax dollars on enforcement on State Highways for such minimal compensation. Sandy Fox, 5801 West 68th Street, suggested Mr. Donnelly take part in the Edina Police Citizens Academy to gain a greater understanding of the effect of the officer enforcing traffic laws on State Highways as well as city streets. Penn Josslin, 6418 Indian Hills Road, stated he had received a ticket for a STOP sign violation and asked why such a small percentage of the fine came to Edina. Mr. Josslin asked if the property values continue to decrease would that have an effect on the City's revenue. Finally Mr. Josslin, congratulated the City on retaining their AAA bond rating. Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road, commented that the quality of services in Edina were high. Nancy Piazza, 5012 Valley View Road, commented that the traffic coming off the Crosstown Highway made it almost impossible to turn off Tracy Avenue near the High School. She also expressed concern about traffic in the vicinity of Valley Lane and Tracy. Staff will follow up with Ms. Piazza. Minutes /Edina City Council Town Hall Meeting /October 1, 2011 Inna Hays, 5857 Creek Valley Road, asked that a directional sign be placed on Tracy Avenue and Valley View Road indicating which street was the correct connection to find the school campus. She said that many people end up lost in her neighborhood looking for the school. Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road, asked about the status of the Neighborhood Associations and potential assistance from the City with organization. Ms. Melton asked how the City intended to define the boundaries of the various neighborhoods. Ron Erhardt, 4214 Sunnyside Road, stated he felt establishing neighborhood associations would be a mistake and more thought should be put into the issue. If the Minneapolis model were to be followed, Mr. Erhardt felt it could have a Balkanizing vulea nizin effect on the community. Mayor Hovland left the meeting at 11:00 a.m. and Acting Mayor Swenson took over as chair. Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road asked about the health initiative that was coming. Carol Frisch, 7025 Comanche Court, thanked the Council not installing a temporary sidewalk on Valley View between Braemar and TH 169. She asked for a sidewalk and the removal of vegetation at Sally Lane and Valley View Road. Penn Josslin, 6418 Indian Hills Road, suggested the Council investigate the health initiative that was offered by the Mayo Clinic as something that would be good for Edina. Jessica Hines, 6608 Ridgeview Drive, asked how citizens stayed informed about City issues. Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road, stated that she knew from the anti - smoking work she had participated in that a multi- faceted approach would be necessary, not just education. There also needed to be an element of peer pressure. Marian Cracraft, 4227 Alden Avenue, suggested that the City focus not just on electronic communication with residents. Janet Lindeen, 5275 Grandview Square, Apt. 3211, commented that she did not know Edina had a community newspaper. Bruce Kieffer, 5404 Edenmoor Street, asked if there were an on -line version of the Edina Sun Current. Sam Thorpe, 5713 Schaefer Road asked what was the Grandview Small Area Plan. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, asked why the Edina Sun Current was paid to be the City's legal newspaper. It was explained that the paper was designated to be the official paper, but the only payment it received was for the publication of legal notices or ads. Ms. Grotz suggested that citizens interested in public health screening could take part in the Bloomington Public Health screening the second Tuesday of each month. She explained that for a cost of about $40.00 people could get basic blood tests detailing their cholesterol, blood glucose, plus other basic data about health. Marian Cracraft, 4227 Alden Avenue, said that she had problems with people parking on the wrong side of Alden Avenue. Staff suggested that she go ahead and call 911. Q Minutes /Edina City Council Town Hall Meeting /October 1, 2011 Freda Terry, 6204 Hillside Road, stated there was not enough parking at the Edina Community Library and Edina Senior Center. Bruce Kieffer, 5404 Edenmoor Street, commented the commercial ramp was way underutilized. Janet Lindeen, 5275 Grandview Square, Apt. 3211, said the Edina Seniors fill up the parking lot early in the morning so that by the time the Library opens at 10:00 a.m. there is not any parking left. Acting Mayor Swenson adjourned the meeting at 11:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 20, 2011 James B. Hovland, Mayor W Jane, You can leave the mic. I will get it later. Barb wants to take some of her art work after the meeting, you can close the.gate and she can go around the back if she is not done, when you leave. Thanks for being here today. You're the best. Donna COUNCIL ROLL CALL "Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Mayor Hovland Member Brindle, Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Mayor Hovland Member Sprague, Member Swenson, Member Bennett, Member Brindle, Mayor Hovland 1I �tl `� �I Jr� cz T J i 07 % o. /D ih f_ (�' r (Cry: f/ /(to _ r - - - -- — i 00t3AJ '7t411— cwt - • -� (+� -�. � '•+ice -�� _� -_.'_ L ( -4- x X �.