HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-11-03 Council Regular Meeting MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 3,2003
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Masica and Mayor Maetzold.
Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:05 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by
Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of
Agenda Item IV.E., Authorize State of Minnesota Grant Contract - Domestic Preparedness
Training.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
GUEST INTRODUCED Member Masica introduced her nephew, Mike Andrews, who would be
observing tonight's Council meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-63, PROCLAIMED AS MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK
Mayor Maetzold presented a Proclamation to representatives of HERO, Health Educators
Reaching Out the Middle School Group and Students Taking Action Together (STAT) the Senior
High Group. Members present to accept the Proclamation were Ian Hendrickson, Alex Krause,
Jack Jorgenson, Abbi Butterfield, Matt Cowan and Advisor Kathy Iverson. Mayor Maetzold
commended the group for their diligent activities relating to alcohol and drug abuse prevention.
The students passed out"red" ribbons provided by Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD).
Member Masica introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-63
A PROCLAMATION.
WHEREAS, over half a million Americans will die this year from alcohol, tobacco and
other drug-related causes;and
WHEREAS, every man, woman and child in America pays nearly $1,000 annually to
cover the costs of unnecessary health care, extra law enforcement, auto accidents, crime, and
lost productivity resulting from substance abuse;and
WHEREAS, every person in the State of Minnesota is affected by alcohol, tobacco and
other drug abuse;and
WHEREAS, prevention and treatment efforts have made major gains in reversing the
trend toward more and more alcohol,tobacco and other drug use in our communities;and
WHEREAS, the color red has been chosen to represent individual and community
commitment to efforts to reduce demand for alcohol and other drugs in our communities;and
WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions,
service organizations, neighborhoods, youth, senior citizens, and other individuals are
encouraged to demonstrate their commitment to help reduce and prevent alcohol, tobacco and
other drug abuse by wearing and/or displaying the color red during Minnesota Chemical
Health Week.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that November 17-23,2003,be declared
MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Counci]/November 3,2003
throughout the City of Edina.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Council Members of the City of
Edina support the activities sponsored by the Minnesota Chemical Health Week, MADD's
Red Ribbon Project,and The Great American Smokeout and encourage the citizens of Edina to
participate in all Minnesota Chemical Health Week activities and other alcohol and drug
abuse prevention efforts year round. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold.
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 21,2003,APPROVED Motion made
by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hovland, approving the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of the Edina City Council for October 21,2003.
Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-76 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BLAKE HEIGHTS -
TC BUILDERS, INC. (GRIFFIT STREET/ARTHUR STREET) Affidavits of Notice were
presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen explained the subject property was located north of Belmore Lane, west of Griffit
Street and east of the unimproved section of Arthur Street extended. He noted the Council had
approved the same preliminary plat for Blake Heights in 2002 for a five lot subdivision. However,
the applicant, Eric Lind and T/C Builders, did not present a final plat for approval within the
required one-year period. As a result, the proposed plat needed to be reheard by the Planning
Commission and the Council. Mr. Larsen said the proposed plat was unchanged from the plat
approved in 2002. Lind and T/C Builders plan to combine the more than four platted lots and a
portion of unimproved Spruce Road and replat the property with five single-dwelling lots. The
existing house and detached garages on the property would be razed to accommodate the new
houses. The Planning Commission considered this proposal at their recent meeting and approved
preliminary plat approval subject to final plat approval, subdivision dedication, and an executed
developer's agreement with the appropriate security.
Mr. Larsen noted that public improvements had been a concern in 2002 when the original
preliminary plat approval was granted. However, the developer will pay for the cost of
improvements and the necessary sewer/water improvements for the extension of Arthur Street.
Member Masica asked why the proponent took such a long time to seek final plat approval.
Mayor Maetzold recollected from 2002, conversations regarding a bike path. Mr. Larsen said
installation of an asphalt path would be a part of the development running north to Hopkins.
Presentation by Developer
Eric Lind, 8635 Glacier Lane, Maple Grove, explained that he was delinquent in requesting final
plat approval because of his ignorance of the one-year requirement. He explained that the project
was placed on the back burner while details of public improvements in the area were worked out
and land negotiations with area property owners explored.
Member Housh asked what types of homes were being planned for the area. Mr. Lind responded
that one home would be built as a model with the area planned for single-family homes. He
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
stated his belief that because of expressed interest in the heavily wooded area, he believes most of
the homes will be pre-sold.
Member Hovland inquired whether concerns of the neighbors have been assuaged. Mr. Lind said
neighborhood meetings have been held as well as City staff has met with neighbors at the site
and in the office. He said the main concern was with the road extension and drainage. Member
Hovland asked if the plan was to pre-sell the lots with the cost of the sewer/water improvements
included in the purchase price. Mr. Lind said funding was not an issue and that they are well
capitalized. Member Hovland voiced concern again that the Planning Commission and Council's
time has been taken with re-hearing this proposal. Mr. Lind apologized to the Planning
Commission and the Council for this proposal not being brought to a conclusion in a timely
fashion.
Resident Presentation
Karen Lundholm, 309 Arthur Street, stated that her mother owns the three lots across from the
proposed development on Arthur Street. She said that, in her opinion, there should have been
more discussions with the neighbors. Nothing has been improved on the land nor have taxes
been paid. She noted the neighborhood was confused with the notification process of the public
meetings on the proposal. Ms. Lundholm stated her mother has not signed off on the easement
because there are questions about the cul-de-sac Ms. Lundholm said her concerns were, 1) oak
trees on the heavily wooded lot would be compromised with development, 2) the three new
homes will create a density problem and, 3) predicted a watershed problem on Lot"1".
Mayor Maetzold indicated the Council had approved three lots with the idea that smaller houses
would be built in keeping with the rest of the neighborhood. He asked Ms. Lundholm what her
preference would be. Ms. Lundholm commented the houses as proposed would range in the half-
million dollar range and the cost in a post WWII neighborhood was not a good fit. She suggested
forgetting about Arthur Street and putting a cul-de-sac off Spruce Street, stating her preference
for two large houses rather than three small houses because of less traffic and density.
Mr. Lind said the land with the vacation of Spruce was platted for three houses. He added he has
met with Ms. Lundholm and discussed the proposed development. The property involved had
been acquired by sealed bid. Three bidders were involved, Blake School, Ms. Lundholm and Eric
Lind with T/C Builders.
Mayor Maetzold inquired whether there were outstanding taxes on the property. Mr. Lind said
he would check with T/C Builders.
Andrew Berenberg, ROK Kosisto, 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Minnetonka, clarified there was one
developer's agreement and it would be handled with City staff. He explained that a cul-de-sac on
Arthur Street was the best option for, 1) snow removal, 2) fire protection, 3) garbage haulers, and
4) school buses. He reminded the Council that what was happening with this proposal was that
four and one half lots were being turned into five lots, which was not increasing the density
dramatically. Mr. Berenberg commented that ROK Kosisto has put together a stormwater
management plan that was approved by the watershed district and by the City.
Karen Lundholm added 1) outstanding taxes on the subject property were a matter of public
record, and 2) there was a group of private investors that desired to buy the property and
maintain it as open space.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
Member Hovland asked Ms. Lundholm about her comments in the Planning Commission
minutes, ...."she understands redevelopment will occur but wants assurances that the
redevelopment of this land was accomplished with good planning." Ms. Lundholm said she
wants wise planning that was sensitive to the rest of the neighborhood, was less dense and
would leave the heavily wooded area as habitat for wildlife.
Mayor Maetzold inquired of Attorney Gilligan if a final plat can be recorded with outstanding
taxes. Mr. Gilligan said no.
Mr. Lind informed the Council that Blake School was considering this property for tennis courts
which would totally clear cut the property or additional bus transportation parking for the
school. Mr. Lind noted that the Blake School plan might not have met City restrictions, admitted
he let the purchase process with the Lundholms go on much too long, and apologized for the
length of time to complete the process.
Member Masica inquired whether the roadway extension installation was fully funded by the
developer. Mr. Lind answered that the developer benefits by two lots and the Lundholms will
benefit by four lots with the approval of the proposal. Member Masica asked if spec or custom
homes would be built. Mr. Lind said one spec home would be built on Lot 1 on Griffit Street, and
they fully expect the others to be pre-sold. Member Masica asked if the lots were enlarged and
the number decreased, what would the price of the homes need to be to regain the investment.
Mr. Lind said the homes would be bigger and cost approximately a million dollars. Member
Masica commented that million dollar homes would not fit the character and symmetry of the
neighborhood.
Member Hovland asked if the preliminary plat were approved when would the final plat be
before the Council. Mr. Lind responded at the next Council meeting, November 18,2003.
Member Housh asked where was the language regarding the cul-de-sac is found in the
agreement. Planner Larsen said that would be within the developer's agreement.
Member Kelly asked how a 55-foot lot could be conforming. Mr. Larsen said the minimum lot
width was 75 feet,but lots already platted at 50 feet or greater that have been owned independent
of another lot that was conforming, were buildable. Edina has numerous situations like this.
Member Kelly did not believe the 55-foot lot to be conforming.
Member Hovland asked for clarification that the two-foot lot variance was not a concern with the
platting of the total plat. Mr. Larsen concurred. Member Hovland asked for confirmation that
staff believed the proposed lots conformed with the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen said that was
staff's recommendation.
Mayor Maetzold inquired about the vacation of Spruce. Mr. Larsen said that has already taken
place and was contingent on the granting of final plat approval.
Member Hovland asked if a requirement could be made of the developer to be back for final plat
approval within a defined time. Attorney Gilligan responded,no.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
Mr. Larsen added the difference today from January 2002, was that the engineering on the
property was complete as well as the watershed has approved the plan.
Ms. Lundholm asked what the nature was of the security. Mr. Larsen said State Statute guided
the security requirement.
Member Housh made a motion closing the public hearing seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Masica said this proposal has taken an inordinate amount of time and she did not know
why it had not gone forward in a timely manner.
Member Housh believed the proposal should go forward, after the year and a half delay.
Member Hovland commented that Mr. Lind has successfully raised the angst of the
neighborhood and taken an enormous amount of the Council's time. However, he said he voted
for the project in 2002 and will again.
Mayor Maetzold indicated he still prefers the concept of the three lots on Griffit.
Member Housh introduced the following resolution and moved is approval:
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-76
APPROVING BLAKE HEIGHTS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,that that certain
plat entitled, "BLAKE HEIGHTS", platted by T/C Builders, Inc., and presented at the regular
meeting of the City Council on November 3, 2003, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat
approval with three conditions: Final Plat approval; Subdivision Dedication; and Developer's
Agreement.
Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 3rd day of November,2003.
Member Masica seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh,Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
'PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET OF NOVEMBER 18, 2003, FOR PRELIMINARY REZONING
AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WALLINGFORD PARTNERSHIP (5101 WEST 70TH
STREET) Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hovland setting
November 18,2002,for the following planning matter:
1. Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat - Wallingford Partnership, 5101
West 70th Street
Motion carried on rollcall vote-four ayes.
'BID AWARDED FOR SCADA SOFTWARE - CONTRACT NO. 03-7 PW, IMP. NO. WM414,
SS-404, STS-284 Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hovland for
award of bid for SCADA Software, Contract No. 03-7 PW, Imp. No. WM414, SS-404, STS-284
to recommended low bidder,Twin Cities Industrial Control - Cited, at$60,473.00.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
Motion carried on rollcall vote-four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR SCADA COMPUTER HARDWARE Motion made by Member Masica
and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for SCADA Computer Hardware to
recommended bidder,WSCA-HP under State of Minnesota Contract#90-00151 at$57,579.23.
Motion carried on rollcall vote-four ayes.
*2004 COUNCIL MEETING DATES AND HOLIDAYS APPROVED Motion made by Member
Masica and seconded by Member Hovland approving the schedule for the Council meeting
dates and holidays for 2004.
Motion carried on rollcall vote-four ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF OCTOBER 6, 2003, CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER
21,2003,APPROVED;SIDEWALK STUDY REQUESTED Coordinator Bongaarts explained that
a petition had come forward requesting STOP signs on Blake Road at Fox Meadow Lane. The
petition was signed by nine of the twelve homes on Fox Meadow Lane, west of Blake Road and
signed by three homes south of Fox Meadow Lane on the west side of Blake Road. Mr. Bongaarts
said that Blake Road was a state aid collector roadway with average daily traffic (ADT) of 2,974
(June 2003). The volume on Blake Road has remained consistent since 1999.
Mr. Bongaarts stated Fox Meadow Lane to west of Blake Road was a dead end street with 12
residents and an estimated maximum ADT of 168 vehicles. Fox Meadow Lane, east of Blake Road
has five residents and the new park with an estimated ADT of 70 vehicles. He reported the 85-
percentile speed on Blake Road, just south of the intersection in with Fox Meadow Lane (June
2003) was 38 mph, in 1999 the MPH was 39 and June 2001 it also was 39. Thirty-eight percent of
those surveyed were between 34 and 39 mph. One-thousand seven hundred thirty-six vehicles or
8.3% of those surveyed were at 40+ mph. Mr. Bongaarts said the 85 percentile speed of 38 mph on
Blake Road was consistent with other collector streets in Edina.
Mr. Bongaarts said no accidents have been reported at this location since January 1, 1991. The
petition mentions that the 'Fox Meadow intersection was especially hazardous due to the blind
intersection created by higher ground levels and heavy vegetation on the two west corners.'
Recently, the corner was re-landscaped by the resident and continues to the curb line, which was
in violation of the clear-view ordinance. Normally clear-view was addressed only on complaint.
Staff recommends denial of the request for lack of warrants. However, staff recommends a
feasibility study regarding installation of a sidewalk on the west side of Blake Road from Scriver
Road (located north of Fox Meadow Lane) to Fox Meadow Lane to capture more foot traffic to
justify a crosswalk at Fox Meadow and Blake Road. Presently there was no place on the west side
of Blake Road to safely end a crosswalk. There are presently sidewalks on the east side of Blake
Road and along the Park on the southeast corner.
Mr. Bongaarts presented a slide presentation of the intersection.
Member Hovland inquired why no sidewalk feasibility study was proposed south of the
interchange on the west side (from Fox Meadow south to Evanswood). Mr. Bongaarts responded
the area has many obstacles, e.g. telephone poles, large trees, and residents who do not want
sidewalks. In his opinion, there should be sidewalks to Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard.
Member Kelly expressed his concern with no crosswalks near all schools and parks.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
Member Hovland commented he did not think that matching the sidewalk to the other side of the
street was a concern and could work.
Member Masica said the issue was child safety. She inquired about the installation of flashing
lights at the intersection. Mr. Houle explained the City's crosswalk policy had recently been
updated to include flashing lights at a couple locations in the City. The intersection would not
meet warrants at this time for a flashing signal. Member Masica said the park at this time seems
to be an attractive nuisance.
Mr. Bongaarts voiced his concern with STOP signs at this location that so little traffic from Fox
Meadow, that the STOP could not guarantee an expectation of safety.
Bernie Beaver, 6225 Fox Meadow Lane, stated, 1) Blake Road was the longest stretch of road in
Edina without STOP signs or lights and the fastest speeds, 2) Fox Meadow was only four
cornered intersection on the subject stretch of Blake Road, 3) Blake Road rises immediately north
of the intersection obstructing the view, 4) completion of the park has changed the semantics of
the neighborhood with more people walking to the park, 5) favors sidewalks, which would
encourage more pedestrian traffic, 6) installation of landscaping on intersection has improved
sightlines, and 7) the person objecting to sidewalks in the area was no longer living in the
neighborhood.
Member Kelly stated there needed to be some uniformity with the warrant system wherever
pedestrians are crossing to City parks and schools.
Member Housh indicated a good 'first task' for the Transportation Committee would be to study
the warrant system, specifically in the areas of City parks and schools.
Alison Gregory, 6200 Fox Meadow Lane, submitted a letter dated October 21, 2003, stated a STOP
sign at that location was not justified and will only increase traffic noise and become a nuisance.
Member Hovland made a motion approving the Minutes of the October 6, 2003, Traffic Safety
Staff Review Section A; B and C. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh,Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Following a Council discussion, Member Hovland made a motion directing staff to study a
pedestrian sidewalk on Blake Road and to connect Interlachen Boulevard to Parkwood
Avenue on both sides of the street. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR ABOVE
GROUND SWIMMING POOL 15601 MCGUIRE ROAD) Assistant Manager Anderson gave
background into the complaint regarding the above ground swimming pool located at 5601
McGuire Road. Edina City Code specifically prohibits above ground pools with water depth over
24 inches. As a result of that complaint, Tim and Judy Chirpich were notified of the violation and
given the option to appeal the violation with the Construction Board of Appeals. That
information was incorrect direction to give the residents at 5601 McGuire Load. Mr. Anderson
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
elaborated that the Construction Board of Appeals does not have the authority to grant a variance
for this type of violation. The Construction Board of Appeals examines interpretations made by
the sanitarian and building official, related to the City Code. Everyone was in agreement that the
above ground pool at 5601 McGuire Road was not in compliance. Options available are, 1) deny
the appeal and 2) after study of the existing ordinance, consider a change to the Code related to
the soft sided pools.
Gerald Robinson, neighbor of the Chirpich family, stated his belief that there was ambiguity in
the Edina City Code. Attorney Gilligan explained the issue began with an appeal process but the
Construction Board of Appeals did not have jurisdiction. He recommended upholding the
decision of the Board and denying the appeal. Mr. Gilligan added the Council could decide to
study this portion of the Code if they desired to do so. Mr. Robinson said he believed the
Chirpichs were challenging the Code regarding pools as well as play structures, etc. that was
passed in 1979,based upon aesthetics.
Building Official Kirchman explained the Board directed a memorandum to the Council asking
that the 1979 Ordinance be studied to see if changes were warranted.
Member Hovland made a motion upholding the decision of the Construction Board of
Appeals denying the variance allowing an above ground swimming pool that was specifically
prohibited by the City Code. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh,Hovland,Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Mayor Maetzold inquired if the Council wanted the Code to be studied and the results reported
back to the Council at a later date. He explained the process to be followed would be, 1) staff
studying the issue, 2) reporting results of the study to the Council with recommendations, 3)
publish the issue, and 4) set a public hearing for resident comments at a Council meeting.
Member Masica asked if the 1979 Code regarding above ground pools was based on aesthetics or
safety issues. Mr. Kirchman explained no verbatim minutes existed from 1979. However, several
staff members recalled an incident precipitating the Ordinance,which was purely aesthetics.
Chief Scheerer said the Fire Department does consider pools of this type a risk and a safety
concern if a rescue was needed. Department staff train with rescue in below ground pools from
where there was a large stable area to work. He added it would be difficult to step over the side
and into a pool with an unknown depth.
Member Housh queried if pools of this type were acceptable in other communities.
Member Hovland voiced concern with, 1) how do you keep the water clean, 2) how do you get
rid of the water, 3) how are little neighborhood children kept out, and 4) how do little children
get out of the pool.
Mr. Anderson reminded the Council that the concern was complaint driven.
Mayor Maetzold suggested further discussions and study of the Ordinance on the use of above
ground pools.
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
Member Kelly said he personally would not have staff study the issue. He voiced concern with,
1) no fencing, 2) small children in the neighborhood, 3) night time safety, and 4) water quality. He
stated he would not be in favor of changing the ordinance.
Member Masica said information she was provided in the packet stated that the pool was
designed to be filled to a maximum level of 30 inches.
Member Hovland said the Ordinance has not been studied for 25 years and staff should study the
local and standards nation-wide for above ground pools.
Mr. Anderson said staff would study the issue and report back to Council with their findings and
recommendations.
APPEAL OF CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION UPHELD FOR
SWIMMING POOL LADDER Mr. Kirchman explained when a final inspection was completed
for the in-ground pool at 6301 South Knoll Drive, it was noted that no ladder was installed in the
pool. The homeowners were sent a letter dated July 29, 2002, of this violation stating: 'The
swimming pool must have two means of egress from the pool. Steps may be used in the shallow
end of the pool. A ladder with handrails must be located at the deep end of the pool". Mr.
Kirchman reported the homeowners, David and Connie Brockway, appealed this decision with
the Construction Board of Appeals. He concluded the Construction Board of Appeals
recommended upholding the denial of the request for the deletion of an egress ladder in the deep
end of the applicant's swimming pool.
Member Masica asked if the ladder was noted during the course of the plan review and brought
to the attention of the pool builder. Mr. Kirchman said yes the builder, Quality Pools, was
familiar in with Edina Ordinances.
Connie Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, explained the pool was completed in June 2003. Upon
final inspection was the first time installation of a ladder was mentioned to them or the builder
about a ladder being necessary. Installing a ladder now would be very expensive. She added that
money and aesthetics were not a substitute for safety. They polled surrounding cities and
Bloomington was the only polled city that required a ladder or a swim-out from the deep end of
the pool. Ms. Brockway said an internet search of the whole country was completed and the most
restrictive codes required either a ladder, a swim-out or a projecting bull-nose around the pools
perimeter. She concluded that if they had known a ladder was a requirement, they would have
installed one.
Member Kelly stated there would be no financial consequence to the homeowners, but the
builder would be responsible. He suggested the City notice the builder about the violation and
subsequent necessity of a ladder. Mr. Anderson stated that staff would notice the builder of the
requirement.
David Brockway, 6301 South Knoll Drive, suggested studying the ladder issue when the City
Code was studied about above ground, soft-sided pools.
Mr. Kirchman added that a ladder in the deep end of a pool was a rescue aid in case of
emergencies.
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 3,2003
Member Hovland made a motion to deny the appeal requesting the deletion of an egress
ladder in the deep end of applicant's swimming pool. Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh,Hovland, Kelly, Masica,Maetzold
Motion carried.
APPROVE AUTHORIZATION STATE TE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT FOR
DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS TRAINING Member Masica asked that the Authorization of
State of Minnesota Grant Contract for Domestic Preparedness Training be removed from the
Consent Agenda for further information. Member Masica inquired whether this was the first
phase of the grant and just a tabletop exercise. Chief Siitari responded that this grant informs first
line supervisors about the ability to format strategies.
Member Masica made a motion approving the grant contract between the State of Minnesota,
Division of Emergency Management, and the City of Edina for Domestic Preparedness
Training Funds.Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh,Hovland,Kelly, Masica,Maetzold
Motion carried.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Hovland
seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the
Check Register dated October 22, 2003, and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $66,349.44;
Communications Fund $11,664.23; Working Capital Fund $964,262.53; Construction Fund
$1,522.68; Art Center Fund $3,172.36; Golf Course Fund $22,040.86; Ice Arena Fund $935.02,
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,773.00; Liquor Fund $168,070.94; Utility Fund
$32,221.61; Storm Sewer Fund $4,110.56; PSTF Agency Fund $23,323.01; TOTAL $1,305,446.24;
and for approval of payment of claims dated October 29, 2003, and consisting of 30 pages:
General Fund $318,638.04; CDBG Fund $2,746.00; Communications Fund $10,473.47; Working
Capital Fund $196,890.17; Construction Fund $2,226.80; Art Center Fund $22,498.63, Aquatic
Center ($114.49); Golf Course Fund $2,811.80; Ice Arena Fund $4,153.28,
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $9,449.88; Liquor Fund $117,057.96; Utility Fund
$316,764.05; Storm Sewer Fund $22,314.27; PSTF Agency Fund $234,225.13; TOTAL
$1,260,134.89.
Motion carried on rollcall vote-four ayes.
COMMUNICATION RECEIVED Mayor Maetzold explained that recently, a letter, dated
October 24, 2003, was received from James A. Vose, 4529 Casco Avenue relating to a sewer back-
up that occurred last July. Manager Hughes drafted a letter in response to Mr. Vose. Council
consensus was that the draft letter depicted the City's reasoning and should be submitted to Mr.
Vose.
No formal Council action was taken.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
Ci lerk
Page 10