HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-12-04 Council Regular Meeting MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 4, 2007
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and
seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2007, WORK SESSION
OF NOVEMBER 20, 2007, AND STUDY SESSION OF OCTOBER 23, 2007, APPROVED
Member Masica made a motion approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
November 20, 2007, Work Session of November 20, 2007, and Study Session of October 23,
2007. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-130 APPROVING IMPROVEMENT NO. A-213 &
IMPROVEMENT NO. A-214 COUNTRY CLUB AREA SEWER, WATER AND STREET
RECONSTRUCTION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Engineer Presentation
Engineer Houle stated the proposed improvements were staff initiated in 2005 to address
utility concerns within the Edina Country Club District. A public hearing was held on July
19, 2005. At that public hearing the City Council decided to delay the project until a
transportation plan was adopted for the Northeast Area of Edina. The Edina Transportation
Commission completed the Northeast Edina Transportation Study (NEETS) in 2006. The
Edina City Council adopted the NEETS in 2006.
Mr. Houle said the proposed project would involve reconstructing the water main system,
repairing and upgrading the sanitary sewer system, upgrading the storm sewer system,
replacing the street lighting system, and reconstructing the roadway. He said all components
of the NEETS, as they relate to the Country Club District, have been incorporated into this
proposal. Mr. Houle reported the following groups have reviewed the attached proposal:
• Edina Transportation Commission - recommendation of plan was consistent with
NEETS, see attached draft minutes.
• Edina Bike Task Force - letter attached to Feasibility Study and new letter attached to
report.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
• Edina School Bus -email attached to Feasibility Study.
• Edina Fire Department-letter attached to Feasibility Study.
• Edina Preservation Board - recommended Certificate of Appropriateness, draft
minutes attached to Feasibility Study.
Mr. Houle explained staff was proposing a two-year staged reconstruction, with the
northerly portion of the Country Club being reconstructed in 2008 and the southerly portion
being reconstructed in 2009. He reported the estimated project cost was $19,639,000; which
included all utility repairs and upgrades and all assessed costs. The special assessment
amount for this project was estimated to be $5,078,000 for Improvement Area A-213 and
$4,579,000 for Improvement Area A-214, which would be approximately $18,210 and $22,900,
respectively, per residential equivalent unit (REU). Mr. Houle said if homeowners replaced
their own sanitary sewer service pipes, they would respectively receive a credit of either
$6,000 or $6,400. He noted a revised Feasibility Study was included in the Council's packets,
along with all correspondence received to date. Mr. Houle concluded, staff analyzed the
project and felt that the project was feasible from an engineering standpoint. He introduced
Paul Pasko of Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., the City's consultant engineer for the
improvement projects.
Paul Pasko, Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., using video and a PowerPoint presentation,
reviewed the proposed project. He stated that since 1989 there had been 271 trunk water
main repairs and 25 trunk sanitary sewer blockages. Mr. Pasko said the private water mains
and sanitary sewer service pipes were the same age as the City's utility pipes and likely in the
same condition. He stated the streets in the Country Club district were in poor condition.
The street lights in the neighborhood were approximately 40 years old and also in need of
replacement. Mr. Pasko noted the Northeast Edina Transportation Study had outlined some
traffic calming measures that included: speed humps, raised crosswalks, center island
narrowing, narrowing of the intersections, realignment of the intersections, traffic circles, and
raised intersections. He said the proposed measures had been incorporated into the project.
Mr. Pasko said that due to the width of the streets, it was being recommended that Wooddale
Avenue be designated as the "Share the Road" bike route through the area. He added that all
of the items had been incorporated into a comprehensive reconstruction project that would
be staged over a two-year period.
The Council's questions included: request for description of how the manholes and storm
sewer would function, bike lane designation, how homeowner's would obtain the "credit"
for replacing their own sewer service pipe, how would costs increase if utility work was not
funded by the City, what caused the large cost increase from 2005, request for an explanation
of "Share the Road" bike lane concept, request as to how the longer response times would be
handled by the Edina Fire Department with the proposed traffic calming measures, and why
were two project areas being used for assessments.
Staff and consultants answered the questions as follows: the manholes and storm sewer
would act as grit chambers and attempt to capture some of the debris before the storm water
went into the creek, the "Share the Road" concept was decided upon due to the width of the
street, the parking on the streets and challenges with trying to move cyclists from one street
to another. It was explained that one of the goals of the reconstruction project was to keep
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
the right-of-way from being dug up for several years; therefore, the requirement for the
replacement of the sewer service pipes was included. If a property owner had pulled a
permit within the last fifteen years and a final inspection was shown on City records, that
property would receive a credit. The cost of the improvement would double if the City was
not paying for the utility work being completed. The two residential equivalent units were
developed based upon the lot sizes. Costs for the project have increased as a result of
Hurricane Katrina which closed down several oil refineries raising the cost of shipping
materials, as well as raising the cost of any petroleum based product. In addition, the cost of
copper wiring has greatly increased in the past two years. Also the great need for
infrastructure improvements in the hurricane ravaged area increases the costs of competing
projects in other areas. It was also pointed out that when estimating proposed project costs,
very conservative estimates were used, but it was hoped that favorable bids would be
received. The Fire Chief explained that the goal for emergency vehicle response was eight
minutes or less ninety percent of the time. The proposed traffic calming would increase
response time by somewhere between three and twenty-seven seconds, however, Edina's
current response time was averaging about four minutes.
I
Public Comment
Jack Boyer, 4605 Arden Avenue, stated he thought it was wrong to expect residents to bear
burden of replacing infrastructure.
Jonathan Gross, 4208 Grimes, questioned the proposed traffic calming measures. He added
the entire city should not pay for the traffic calming.
Lee McGrath, 4619 Moorland Avenue, questioned whether any cost saving measures had
been researched.
Margaret Hoppmann, 4602 Moorland Avenue, said the improvement would benefit the
entire City and because of the size of the expense to the homeowners it should be shared with
all residents.
Matthew Pierre,4618 Bruce Avenue, asked about the criteria for special assessments and how
the 50/50 split had been derived. He also asked about plans for protection of the mature
trees in the affected neighborhood.
Todd Roddis, 4928 Arden Avenue, asked about the 2005 projections of potential increased
maintenance costs compare to the actual costs experienced.
Tom Dougherty, 4911 Sunnyside Road, stated that in his opinion, Sunnyside Road west of
Browndale does not need reconstruction. He stated the cost of the assessment may not
exceed the value added.
Bruce Christiansen,4515 Browndale, objected to the proposed traffic calming measures.
David Pearson, 4513 Browndale Avenue, stated he was shocked at the increased cost of the
project. He requested the City look at how the project costs will be funded.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
Spud Carpenter, 4356 Oakdale Avenue, disagreed with the proposed traffic calming
measures and expressed concern with their negative impact on response time of emergency
vehicles.
Paul Laederach, 4633 Bruce Avenue, stated he was a senior citizen on fixed income and that
over the life of the ten year term of the assessment he will be paying$36,000 for the proposed
$18,000 improvement.
Charles Anderson,4616 Browndale, questioned the sidewalk in the proposed improvement.
Nancy Jarrett, 4500 Browndale Avenue, asked that the street light replacement be explained
and also why cost increases in Minnesota were tied to Hurricane Katrina.
Following the public comments, the Council had the staff and consultants answer all the
questions raised by the speakers.
Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Following the Council's discussion, Member Swenson made a motion introducing and
moving the approval of Resolution No. 2007-130 receiving the feasibility report for
Improvement No. A-213 and Improvement No. A-214, ordering Improvement No. A-213
and Improvement No. A-214, County Club Area Sewer Water and Street Reconstruction,
appointing the City Engineer, as the engineer for the project, and authorizing preparation
of plans and specifications, and advertisement for bids. Member Housh seconded the
motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica,Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET OF DECEMBER 18, 2007, FOR PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT
PLAN REVIEW, 77m STREET & PARKLAWN AVENUE, WAYZATA PROPERTIES
(GATEWAY AREAS Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson
setting December 18, 2007, as hearing date for Preliminary Development Plan Review, 77th
Street &Parklawn Avenue,Wayzata Properties (Gateway Area)
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-17 ADOPTED - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
850.11 REGARDING BUILDING HEGIHT IN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT Planner
Teague reviewed the changes made to Ordinance No. 2007-17 at the direction of the Council
when the ordinance was granted first reading, November 20, 2007:
• The standards have been applied to duplexes as well as single-family houses;
• If a split level dwelling gets torn down and a new home built, the new first floor
elevation must not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home
that was torn down.
• A definition of split level was added.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
The Council discussed the ordinance and suggested some changes to the language in Section
2 that would amend Subsection 850.11 subd. 7, along with correction of a typo. There was a
question regarding correspondence from a resident living in the flood plain that would be
affected by the new regulation. Mr. Teague explained the resident could apply for a variance
with their hardship being the location of their home in the floodplain. Following discussion,
Member Bennett made a motion granting second reading to Ordinance No. 2007-17
amending Section 850.11 regarding building height in the R-1 Zoning District. Member
Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-18 ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON
DEMOLITION Mayor Hovland explained that on the 20+" of November the Council took
over two hours of testimony regarding a moratorium on demolitions within Edina. He noted
the public hearing had been closed November 20, 2007. Staff was directed to prepare an
ordinance that would enact a temporary demolition moratorium for consideration by the
Council. Since the November 20th meeting, Mayor Hovland noted the Council had received
many communications both by phone and in writing from constituents stating their opinion
for or against any type of moratorium. He stated the Council would be accepting testimony
on the issue at the current meeting, but would limit total testimony to forty minutes and limit
each speaker to two minutes. Further, he asked that persons who testified at the previous
meeting not speak in order to allow more people to voice their opinions.
Mr. Hughes noted the Council, at their November 20, 2007, meeting directed staff to prepare
a moratorium ordinance with respect to the demolition of single family dwellings. Mr.
Hughes said the City Attorney prepared an ordinance modeled after the moratorium
ordinance currently in effect for the Country Club district of Edina. He said the proposed
moratorium would prohibit the demolition of single family dwellings anywhere in Edina
during the moratorium which would last until April 15, 2008.
Mr. Hughes said the proposed moratorium ordinance defined demolition as a tear down or
removal of a dwelling, or the physical alteration of the dwelling such that 50% of more of the
surface area of the existing exterior walls in the aggregate were removed. The moratorium
would not affect demolitions for which a permit or variance had been applied for prior to the
date of enactment. It would not restrict issuance of new building permits for new homes on
vacant lots.
Mr. Hughes stated the staff would not recommend imposing a moratorium on only certain
parts of the City or only on certain lots, rather if enacted the moratorium should be applied to
all single family dwelling unit lots within the community.
Mayor Hovland called for public comment.
Public Comment
John Bold, 4608 Merilane, opposed a moratorium
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
Jim Aufderheide, 5325 West 62nd Street opposed a moratorium.
Matt Freeman, Bond Companies,4351 200 Street East Prior Lake, opposed a moratorium.
Art Heiam, 5205 Ridgewod Drive, opposed a moratorium.
Jill Larson, 5324 Oaklawn Avenue supported a moratorium.
Paul Ferry, 5006 Bruce Avenue, opposed a moratorium.
Sherrilynn Mahowald, 4330 West 42nd Street, supported a moratorium.
Beth Andrews 6045 High Point Road, Shoreview, realtor, on behalf of clients, 3508 West 55th
Street opposed a moratorium.
Lee McGrath,4619 Moorland Avenue, opposed a moratorium.
Barry Berg, 600 2nd Street, Minneapolis, realtor, opposed a moratorium.
Calvin Vaubel, 5318 Oaklawn Avenue, supported a moratorium.
Susan Gruidl,4217 West 42nd Street, opposed a moratorium.
Ted Allen, 5216 Halifax Avenue, opposed a moratorium.
Tom Lund 5319 Oaklawn Avenue, supported a moratorium.
Steve Ayres, 19808 Dawson Lane, Farmington, opposed a moratorium.
Margaret Burt, 3300 West 55th Street, opposed a moratorium.
The Council each stated their opinions and positions on the proposed moratorium after
listening to the public comments. They acknowledged the difficulty of the issues relative to
massing and stated their intention to proceed with regulatory changes in the near future.
Mayor Hovland called the question asking if there was a motion to adopt the proposed
moratorium ordinance. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett to
adopt the ordinance. Mayor Hovland clarified he asked whether anyone would move
adopting the moratorium ordinance. Member Masica withdrew her motion and Member
Bennett withdrew her second,whereupon, Mayor Hovland stated the matter failed for lack
of a motion.
CONCERN OF RESIDENTS Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, stated he felt the Council
needed to allow citizens a greater voice in government.
No formal Council action was taken.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
NOTE: THE NARATIVE AND ACTION FOR THE CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AMENDED
LANDSCAPE PLAN WERE MISTAKENLY NOT INCLUDED IN THE DECEMBER 4, 2007,
MINUTES WHEN SUBMITTED TO THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED, BUT THE MINUTES WERE
CORRECTED BY AN ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ADDITION TO THE
MINUTES MAY 20, 2008
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-135 ADOPTED AMENDING LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CALVIN
CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Mr. Teague stated the City Council at their last meeting had directed the
Calvin Christian School to meet with the neighborhood to work out a landscape plan that was
acceptable. Calvin Christian School removed trees from their property in preparation for the building
addition. These trees were to have been relocated on their property, rather than be removed. This
constituted a violation of the approved conditional use permit which had been originally approved
by the City Council August 7, 2007, when variances and a conditional use permit had been granted
allowing additions and renovations to two school buildings located at 4015 Inglewood Avenue.
Mr. Teague reported the neighborhood meeting was held on November 27, with residents of the area,
parents of students at the school, members of the Church, Member Bennett and himself attending. He
reviewed the resulting changes to the landscaping plan that represented a consensus of those
attending the meeting:
• Installing two 8-foot tall three stemmed River Birch trees in the rain garden located north of
the west building; and one 8-foot tall three stemmed River Birch in the rain garden east of the
west building.
• Replacing the previously proposed four Linen Trees with four Maples, including one large
tree spaded Maple north of the parent drop off area on Inglewood Avenue.
• Replacing all Sumac and Green Spruce with Japanese Yews and Shrub Roses within the bus
circle area.
• Replacing the four Poplar Trees with four large tree-spaded Swamp Oaks in the bus circle.
• Replacing the five Linden Trees with five Maple Trees north of the bus circle.
Mr. Teague said the Council had two options: 1) If the revised landscape plan was believed to be an
acceptable remedy to the violation, approve the revised plan, with the condition that the plans shall
be subject to review by the City Forester; or 2) If the revised plan was not acceptable, refer a revised
conditional use permit back to the Planning Commission for consideration.
Member Housh made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2007-135 approving the amended
landscape plan for Calvin Christian School. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-128 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted
by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.
Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007-128 accepting various donations. Member
Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member
Swenson seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in
detail on the Check Register dated November 21, 2007, and consisting of 21 pages: General
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
Fund $109,908.20; CDBG Fund $81,827.00; Communications Fund $8,553.51; Working
Capital Fund $663,179.54; Construction Fund $172,472.58; Art Center Fund $387.93; Golf
Dome Fund $1„733.38; Aquatic Center Fund $37.28; Golf Course Fund $1,796.33; Ice Arena
Fund $1695.03; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $4,813.56; Liquor Fund $197,933.08;
Utility Fund $38,024.33; Storm Sewer Fund $58,830.92; PSTF Agency Fund $1,562.65;
TOTAL $1,342,755.32; and for approval of payment of claims dated November 29, 2007,
and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $370,481.85; Communications Fund $2,437.22;
Working Capital Fund $859,036.36; Construction Fund $6,484.22; Art Center Fund $2,747.30;
Golf Dome Fund $125.06; Aquatic Center Fund $137.03; Golf Course Fund $8,854.36; Ice
Arena Fund $271.83; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $25,171.88; Liquor Fund
$116,120.13; Utility Fund $85,043.82; Storm Sewer Fund $10,056.38; TOTAL 1,486,967.44.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON LIQUOR FEES, ORDINANCE NO 2007-19 GRANTED
FIRST READING AMENDING CODE SECTION 185 - INCREASING CERTAIN FEES
Mr. Hughes reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment increasing certain fees. He noted
the consideration of the proposed amendment included a public hearing on the 2008
proposed liquor fees which was required under statute. Mr. Hughes said the required 30 day
notice had been sent to all liquor licensees. He gave a general overview of the proposed
amendment to Code Section 185, focusing on the increases in some liquor license fees.
No one appeared for public comment.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett to close the public
hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Swenson made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 2007-19,
Amending Code Section 185, increasing certain fees. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-125 APPROVED - YEAR 2008 PARK AND RECREATION FEES
AND CHARGES Mr. Hughes indicated fee increases for 2008 for the Park and Recreation
Department were minimal with most fees not changing from 2007. He reminded the Council,
following a question by Member Swenson, that the Edina Foundation has set up a 'grant in
aid' or scholarship fund for financially challenged families. The Park Department has an
application for this anonymous help as well as for help with transportation. The Council
questioned why the fee for residents and non residents was proposed at the same rate for the
Edinborough Play Park for 2008. Mr. Hughes suggested Council approve all fees except the
one in question.
Member Swenson made a motion approving Resolution No. 2007-125, Year 2008 Park and
Recreation Fees and Charges excluding the Edinborough Play Park Fees. Member Bennett
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-126 APPROVED - YEAR 2008 AMBULANCE FEES Member
Housh introduced Resolution No. 2007-126, Year 2008 Ambulance Fees and moved
adoption. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-127 APPROVED - YEAR 2008 MISCELLANEOUS FEES Mr.
Hughes indicated that fees deemed as miscellaneous were mainly from the Fire Department
and one from the Planning Department.
Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2007-127 Year 2008 Miscellaneous Fees, and
moved adoption. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-129 ADOPTED AUTHORIZING SALE OF REVENUE BONDS -
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA - Mayor Hovland noted the Council needed to affirm the action
taken earlier by the Edina HRA regarding the issuance of revenue bonds on behalf of the Volunteers of
America (VOA). If approved the proceeds of the bond issue will be used by the VOA to acquire a new
corporate headquarters building at 7625 Metro Boulevard in Edina. He noted that according to the
City's tax exempt revenue bond financing guidelines the City will be paid an issuance fee of 1/2% of
the principal amount of the bond issue. He said other out of pocket costs of the City will be
reimbursed if the HRA authorizes the bond sale.
Member Housh made a motion introducing Resolution No. 2007-129 and moved its adoption
authorizing the sale of a revenue note pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to
469.1651, as amended at the request of Volunteers of America in the principal amount of
$2,500,000, and approving forms of documents in connection therewith. Member Bennett
seconded the motion
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:55 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
;. City Clerk
Page 9