HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-04-01 HRA Regular Meeting AGENDA
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
Tuesday, April 1, 1975, at 7:30 P.M.
Edina City Hall
1. Roll Call.
2. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting, Held
March 4, 1975.
3. Recommendations and Reports.
A. Union Oil Acquisition (Continue to May 6) .
B. Report on the Feasibility Report.
C. Urban Design Contract.
D. Engineering Contract for Ramp.
E. Request to Transfer Funds.
F. Report on Land Acquisition.
4. Adjournment.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1975
EDINA CITY HALL
1. Roll Call: Charles W. Freeburg, Chairman
James W. Nelson
Gary B. Lyall
William F. Greer
Staff Present: Greg Luce, Executive Director
Thomas S. Erickson, H.R.A. Attorney
David Schnobrich, Project Planner
Barbara Peterson, Secretary
2. Approval of the Minutes of the February 4, 1975, H.R.A. Meeting.
A motion to approve the minutes of the February 4, 1975, H.R.A. meeting was
made by Mr. Lyall and seconded by Mr. Greer. Upon roll call the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Lyall, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Greer.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
3. Recommendations and Reports.
A. Reappointment of Commissioner Gary B. Lyall.
Mr. Luce reported to the Commissioners that at the February 24, 1975, Council
meeting the Council approved the five year term for the reappointment of Mr. Lyall.
Upon this notification, Mr. Lyall was formally reappointed for a five year term
to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota.
B. Proposed Acquisition of Union Oil Property (Continued from 2-4-75) .
Mr. Luce reported that the staff and Union Oil have been working together to
investigate various alternatives in lieu of relocation of the station. After review
and various discussion held on these alternatives, it was decided that none were
satisfactory to the continuation of the station. Mr. Hyman Edelman, attorney
representing the Union Oil Company, described the various alternatives that were not
satisfactory to Union Oil and the reasons. He then stated that Union Oil has
therefore agreed to write a letter of intent to the City of Edina to sell the
station and property upon a satisfactory relocation site. He also stated that a
final agreement will be entered into with the H.R.A. in approximately six weeks when
Union Oil has completed the necessary feasibility study to determine the best solution
for the station. Mr. Edelman recommended that the City of Edina lease the station
for approximately a year to a year and one-half to provide a turn around time for the
two operators. Mr. Luce stated there would be no problem in doing so. After a
brief discussion, it was decided that Mr. Edelman will draft a letter of intent to
show good faith and forward it to the H.R.A. Attorney, Tom Erickson, for review.
Mr. Glenn Hubbard of Union Oil then presented a plan alternative that had been
examined by Union Oil and the staff. Considerable discussion was held on the proposed
plan and why it was not feasible to the H.R.A. staff in terms of the visibility,
curb cuts and traffic flow. Mr. Hubbard stated that Union Oil would be unable to
operate its station economically if the H.R.A. staff recommendation were followed
because of the loss of square footage on the site.
3-4-75 H.R.A. Minutes
Page 2
Mr. Frank Coe, one of the station operators, expressed extreme concern over
his financial and business future and that of his partner if Union Oil and the
H.R.A. would not make a commitment to the two operators. Mr. Hubbard stated that
Union Oil does not have a legal or moral obligation to their franchise in this
case; however, he thought the condemning authority would have an obligation. Mr.
Luce then explained the possibilities the H.R.A. will be able to offer the two
operators.
Mrs. Susan Coe, Mr. Phil Johnson, and Rev. Arvid Dixen spoke on behalf of
Union 76 and requested that the H.R.A. review the plans once again to see if this
station can remain on this corner. Considerable discussion was held on a plan
alternative proposed by Mr. Johnson, and also variations of the plan.
Mr. Hosmer Brown, representative from the 50th and France business people,
expressed concern on delaying the actual plan and stated that they are interested
in what is happening to the station; however, this plan has been approved by the
Planning Commission and Council, and the H.R.A. should be taking action on this
plan and resolving this problem quickly".
Mr. Freeburg moved to continue the item. He suggested that Union Oil review
the proposals presented and instructed the staff to meet with Union Oil's engineers
for reviewal and recommendations. Mr. Lyall seconded the motion and upon roll call
the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Lyall, Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Greer, Mr. Nelson.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
Mr. Lyall recommended to also move ahead with the letter of intent and continue
the relocation process, working with Mr. Terry Foster, Minneapolis relocation officer
who had been hired by the H.R.A.
C. Tax Increment Pledge with the City of Edina (Continued from 2-4-75) .
Upon Mr. Luce's request, Mr. Erickson reviewed the tax increment pledge with
the City of Edina. He stated that the pledge is a statutory requirement when tax
increment financing is done which authorizes the City to collect all funds from the
bond sale and hold them and dispurse them to the H.R.A. upon request. The H.R.A.
pledges all revenues from the project, including revenue from tax increment, to the
City, and the City will then use them to pay the bonds. After approval of the tax
increment pledge from the H.R.A. and City Council, it will be filed with the
County Auditor and Treasurer.
After brief discussion, Mr. Nelson moved that the Secretary and Chairman be
authorized to sign the tax increment pledge, as recommended by Mr. Erickson and
Mr. Luce. Mr. Lyall seconded the motion, and upon roll call the following
voted:
Ayes: Mr. Nelson, Mr. Greer, Mr. Lyall, and Mr. Freeburg.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
3-4-75 H.R.A. Minutes
Page 3
D. Urban Design Contract.
Mr. Luce presented a flow chart describing the time table that will be
necessary in order to complete the projected 1975 project activities. A feasibility
study must be prepared and presented to the City Council for approval before any
money is authorized for this project. After approval, an assessment hearing must be
held so that 20 percent of the project cost can be charged against the benefiting
property owners. Mr. Luce stated that the assessment hearing will be held the first
week in April.
Mr. Luce then presented a modified detailed urban design contract with BRW
outlining the design development activities necessary for the feasibility study
and those activities necessary for actual construction. Mr. Luce further explained
the actual work and input and the procedure of initiating each element of the contract.
After lengthy discussion, it was decided that the cost of the feasibility study
would be approximately $7,000, which will be taken from the present H.R.A. budget.
Mr. Erickson thought that the payment procedure should be clarified in the
contract. Mr. Luce agreed to add a separate paragraph to distinguish the payment
procedure of the input of the feasibility study to be an hourly wage.
Mr. Freeburg moved that the H.R.A. authorize its chairman and secretary to
enter into an agreement with BRW for the proposed contract when and if the City
Council approves the undertaking of the feasibility study. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Lyall, and upon roll call the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Lyall, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Greer.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
Mr. Freeburg then moved to recommend to the City Council that the H.R.A. and
staff be authorized to prepare the feasibility study for public improvements in the
50th and France area. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lyall, and upon roll call the
following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Nelson, Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Lyall, Mr. Greer.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
After considerable discussion on the implementation of the contract, Mr.
Freeburg moved that after approval of the feasibility study by the City Council,
the Executive Director notify BRW in writing authorizing the implementation of
Part 1 of the design and development phase of the contract. Mr. Lyall seconded the
motion, and upon roll 'call the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Greer, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Lyall.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
3-4-75 H.R.A. Minutes
Page 4
E. Resolution.
Mr. Luce presented a copy of a resolution authorizing the staff to begin
acquiring options for property. Mr. Erickson briefly reviewed the resolution and
procedures in acquiring land.
After considerable discussion on the length of land options, a motion approving
the following resolution was made by Mr. Freeburg and seconded by Mr. Lyall.
Upon roll call the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Greer, Mr. Lyall.
Nays: None.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota ("H.R.A.") ,
by resolution adopted December 11, 1974, and the Edina City Council ("Council") , by
resolution adopted December 16, 1974, did adopt and approve, respectively, the
50th and France Commercial Area Plan dated December 3, 1974 ("Plan") ; and
WHEREAS, the Plan describes a project area and provides for acquisition of
certain parcels of land within the project areas; and
WHEREAS, the acquisition of said parcels is necessary to carry out the Plan,
which Plan is a redevelopment project as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.421, Subdivision 13; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest that the H.R.A.
acquire the parcels to be acquired pursuant to the Plan, and that such acquisition
proceed as diligently as possible; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable and advisable, and the intent of the H.R.A. , that all
reasonable effort be made to acquire all such parcels by direct negotiation and
purchase and that the use of eminent domain be employed only if necessary, and that
in any such acquisition the provisions of the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, acts amendatory thereof, and
regulations adopted thereto (together called the "Act") , be complied with to the
extent required by applicable statutes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the acquisition of the parcels to be
acquired pursuant to the Plan is necessary to carry out the Plan; that the Executive
Director proceed to give notice of proposed acquisitions pursuant to the resolution
adopted by the H.R.A. at the January 22, 1975, portion of the adjourned meeting of
January 7, 1975, and proceed, in compliance with the Act to the extent applicable,
to obtain appraisals of all parcels to be acquired for review and approval by the
H.R.A. ; that once values have been established by the H.R.A. pursuant to such
appraisals, the Executive Director use all reasonable effort to acquire the parcels
of land to be acquired' pursuant to the Plan, and in compliance with the Act to the
extent applicable, by direct negotiation and purchase and for the value so established;
and that the Executive Director and the attorney for the H.R.A. , together with the
Chairman or Vice-Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, are instructed and
directed to do all things reasonably necessary to so acquire such property by
direct negotiation and purchase-
3-4-75 H.R.A. Minutes
Page 5
F. Community Development Program.
Mr. Luce presented a copy of the Community Development Program which was
approved by the City Council and submitted to Hennepin County for inclusion in the
urban county application to HUD. He briefly reviewed the various elements of the
program and recommended that the H.R.A. implement the housing element, which is
closely related to the function of a housing and redevelopment authority.
Mr. Freeburg moved to ask the City Council to authorize the H.R.A. to
implement the housing element of the Community Development Program. Mr. Nelson
seconded the motion, and upon roll call the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Nelson, Mr. Greer, Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Lyall.
Nays: None.
Motion Carried.
G. Additional discussion was held regarding the general direction of the
50th and France project. Mr. Jarvis was extremely concerned in regard to the out-
come of the meeting.
4. Adjournment.
No further discussion being heard, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made
by Mr. Greer and seconded by Mr. Lyall. Upon roll call the following voted:
Ayes: Mr. Lyall, Mr. Freeburg, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Greer.
Nays: None.
Motion carried. Meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
L
Greg Luce, Executive Director
GL:ln
MEMORANDUM
TO: H.R.A.
FROM: Greg Luce, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Recommendations and Reports for 4-1-75 Meeting.
A. Union Oil Acquisition: very little positive progress has been made
with Union Oil or the tenants in regard to either their relocation
or alternate plans to keep them on that site. I would thus suggest
that this matter be continued to May 6th, and have had that information
typed on the agenda which will be sent to the owners and tenants of
the station.
B. Report on the Feasibility Report: The City accepted the staff draft of
the feasibility report for the reconstruction of 50th and France, and
set the improvement hearing for April 7th. At that meeting, if the
feasibility study is approved, 200 of the project costs will be
obligated and assessed to the property owners.
C. Urban Design Contract: Should the feasibility report be approved by
the City Council and the improvements ordered, it is imperative that
BRW be authorized to complete the design development construction
drawings, etc. For them to begin this work, it is necessary, according
to the contract, that I authorize them by letter to do so. Therefore,
contingent on an approval of the feasibility report by the Council,
I should be instructed to authorize BRW to enter the remaining phases
of their contract.
D. Engineering Contract for Ramp: Bob Dunn, David Schnobrich, Bob Johns
from BRW, and myself reviewed six engineering consulting firms who
expressed interest in designing the north side ramp. From those six
firms, we chose three to interview, and selected the firm of Carl
Walker and Associates. Carl Walker and Associates has designed some-
thing like 50 ramps in the last five years, and in the last three
years has done ten in the metropolitan area. They are exclusively ramp
consultants and in our unanimous opinion, were far and away the best
firm interviewed. They are now preparing a contract for our review, and
I will send that to Tom Erickson as soon as I receive it. Our comments
and redraft (if necessary) will be presented on April 1. In order to
keep on the schedule I submitted to the H.R.A. at the last meeting, the
H.R.A. should authorize the chairman and secretary to execute the
contract contingent on the approval of the feasibility study by the
City Council.
M '
Memo/Staff Report
April 1, 1975 Meeting
Page 2
E. Request to Transfer Funds: If the City Council approves the feasibility
report and authorizes the improvements in the 50th and France area, it
will be necessary to transfer funds to the H.R.A. account so that we may
pay BRW and Carl Walker and Associates (should they be selected) . The
request should include $56,000 for BRW and $20,000 for Carl Walker and
Associates, for a total of $76,000. This money will pay for the total
design for all of the buildings in the 50th and France area, all the
streets, landscaping, walkways, including the construction drawings for
each of these improvements. To my knowledge, there will only be one
additional contract necessary for design or planning in the area, and
that will be for the design engineering of the expansion of the south
side ramp.
F. Report on Land Acquisition: To date options have been delivered and
generally agreed upon for all of the north side parking area except the
Edina liquor store-.and Twin City Federal. The man I must talk to in
regard to Twin City Federal will be back in town on Monday; I intend
to see him as soon as possible. Additional acquisition needed for this
year includes only a minor strip of land acquired for the 49� Street
right of way near the corner 'of 4912 and France. These options will be
prepared by the staff in the near future.
GL:ln
3/27/75