HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-02 WS•
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMMUNITY ROOM
TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2015
5:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. 50TH & FRANCE AVENUE: PARKING & FUTURE OF CITY OWNED
PROPERTIES
IV. AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY
V. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance
in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-
927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
11 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS 11
Tues
June 2
Work Session — Parking & Future of City Owned Properties 501h & France
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Affordable Housing
6:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
June 2
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
June 17
Work Session —joint Meeting with Edina Transportation Commission
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
June 17
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Fri
July 3
INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
Sat
July 4
INDEPENDENCE DAY PARADE
Tues
July 7
Work Session — Sidewalk & Street Maintenance
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Utility Rate Study
5:45 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
White Oaks Improvement Association
6:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
July 7
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
July 21
Work Session — Business Meeting/201-2017 Proposed Budget
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
July 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 4
Night To Unite
Wed
Aug 5
Work Session
COMMUNITY ROOM
Wed
Aug 5
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 18
Promenade Phase 5
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Aug 18
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
•
inomic Development
ne 952-826-0407 • Fax 952-826-0390 • www.EdinaMN.gov
Date: June 2, 2015
To: Mayor and City Council Members
From: Bill Neuendorf
Economic Development Manager
Re: 50"' & France
Parking and Future of City -Owned Properties
Background:
MEMO
�9Z11A.
0�e'
0
WS Item 111.
In 2011, a study was prepared to reconstruct the Center parking structure and expand the South
parking structure at a total cost of approximately $14 million. This plan was not supported by the
business community due to its high cost and high level of disruption during the construction period.
This plan was not implemented.
In 2013, an alternative strategy was pursued to restore and maintain the existing parking structures as
• a first priority and to consider expansion when restoration was complete. Kimley Horn Associates was
engaged to determine the scope of work and to design the improvements.
In 2013 and 2014, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) acquired two parcels of
land on the east and west of the North Parking Garage. The North Garage is the newest parking
structure and has the longest service life making it a strong candidate for expansion. With the
restoration work complete, it is time to turn attention toward parking expansion to ensure that 50'
and France remains a highly desirable place for residents, business owners, employees and other
customers.
Discussion Points:
1) Expansion of the North Parking Garage
a. Additional stalls still appear necessary during peak periods of peak days
i. 2011 study called for 140 to 200 new parking stalls
ii. Recent parking usage data could be analyzed to refine the number
b. Management of existing public parking stalls
i. Improving slightly with 2014-2015 policy changes
ii. North Ramp frequently has space while South & Central Ramps crowded
iii. Minimal additional improvements likely with "free parking" policy
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50t' St. • Edina, MN 55424
50th and France Parking memo
Page 2
c. Coordination with adjacent improvements to privately -owned parcels
i. Post Office property was sold in 2012 and might be redeveloped in the future
ii. Walgreens has possible interest in redevelopment/expansion in the future
d. Expansion for parking or mixed-use parking has high capital cost
i. Order of Magnitude cost for east and west expansion (parking only) _ $5 million
ii. Order of Magnitude cost for east and west expansion (parking plus commercial
space) _ $12 million; a portion of the cost could be offset by sale of new commercial
space
iii. Capital improvements have historically been funded by the HRA with the business
owners bearing the cost of operations and maintenance
e. Phased expansion of east and west parcels should be considered
i. Simultaneously expansion could reduce overall construction disruption
ii. Separate expansion could allow for better staging, less street disruption and
potential coordination with adjacent properties
2) Options for 3944 parcel (formerly Hootens Cleaners)
a. Raze existing building
i. expand with 50-75 new stalls on 2 or 3 levels •
ii. expand with commercial on street level and 25-50 new stalls above
iii. expand with 22 stalls on surface
b. Temporarily retain existing building until ready for full expansion
i. Use for City storage with public parking in rear
ii. Short-term (2-5 years) tenant could lease building `as -is' (e.g. antiques or pop-up retail)
iii. Mid-term tenant (5-10 years) could remodel and lease building (e.g. fitness, retail or
service)
3) Options for the 3930 parcel (formerly Edina Realty
a. Expand with 131 new stalls on 2 or 3 levels
b. Expand with commercial on street level with 94 new stalls above
c. Expand with surface parking (37 stalls)
Attachments:
Excerpts from January 2014 Feasibility Study & Report (8 -pages)
East & West Expansion diagrams with cost estimate (8 -pages) •
Graphs of recent parking usage (5 -pages)
i
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Study
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT
FOR
CITY OF EDINA
50th & FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS
EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P-23
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2550 University Avenue West
Suite 238N
St. Paul, MN 55114
(651) 645-4197
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
Signature: NAIL � (4 '
Daniel J. o , P.E.
Date: January 21, 2014 Lie. No: 44821
r
i
7
r
r
0
0
i
r
7
CITY OF EDINA
50'b & FRANCE DISTRICT
PARKING AND WAYFIND7NG IMPROVEMENTS
EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P-23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Study 0
1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1
2. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS............................................................................................... 3
3. CONSTRUCTION PHASING/STAGING................................................................................. 9
4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT....................................................................................................... 9
5. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS...............................................................................................10
6. ESTIMATED COST............................................................................................................... 25
7. METHOD OF FINANCING................................................................................................... 26
8. PROJECT SCHEDULE.......................................................................................................... 27
9. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................... 27
APPENDIX A — EXHIBITS
Exhibit
1:
Location Map
Exhibit
2:
Existing Public Parking Signs
Exhibit
3:
Proposed Public Parking Signs
Exhibit
4:
Streetscape Improvements Plan
Exhibit
5:
Middle Ramp Improvements
Exhibit
6:
South Ramp Improvements
Exhibit
7:
North Ramp Concept
APPENDIX B — RAMP ASSESSMENT PHOTOS
APPENDIX C — ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
2012 Streetscape Feasibility Report
Summary of Property Owner and Business Owner Focus Group Meetings
Parking Improvement Idea Survey (Business Owners and Property Owners)
Menu of Alternatives
Parking and Transportation Survey (Customers)
APPENDIX D — PARKING OPERATIONS, MANAGEMENT, AND FINANCING
APPENDIX E — PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL AND MAP
• E
E
0
i
U4
t
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Study
1. INTRODUCTION
On August 20, 2013 the Edina City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility
study for the 50th & France Parking and Wayfmding Improvement project, Edina
Improvement No. P-23. The proposed project includes repair, rehabilitation and
future expansion of parking, a new parking wayfinding system, and repair and
rehabilitation of the landscape and streetscape elements.
A feasibility report was previously prepared for 50th & France Parking Ramp
Expansion in April 2012. The recommendations from that report were not
implemented, due to business owner and property owner concern about project cost
and impacts during construction. That feasibility report was based on the shared
parking analysis dated April 12, 2011 that recommends adding 140 — 200 additional
parking stalls.
Currently the following public parking is provided in the Edina portion of 50th &
France District:
• South Ramp:
415 total spaces
200 employee spaces
• Middle Ramp:
274 total spaces
0 employee spaces
• North Ramp:
262 total spaces
220 employee spaces
• Clancy Lot:
36 total spaces
0 employee spaces
• Lunds Lot (Public):
15 total spaces
0 employee spaces
• On -Street:
20 customer spaces
0 employee spaces
There are an additional 305 private spaces in Edina owned by Lunds, Walgreens,
BMO Harris Bank, US Bank, the post office, and the°5000 France condos.
,. � P � � Lnu� . yµfFy [��, Ay •',
Building
s;rte
Surface Lot
DED
wens,^sues Parking Ramp
h�
Currently the following public parking is provided in the Minneapolis portion of the
50th & France District:
• Ewing Lot:. 80 total spaces 0 employee spaces
• On -Street: 20 customer spaces 0 employee spaces
The proposed project recommended in this feasibility report is consistent with the
Guiding Principles. The proposed scope is generally as follows:
Add 140 to 200 new parking stalls through a public / private partnership on the
3930 West 49 Y? Street property (formerly the Edina Realty building) and / or
other sites in the 50th & France District. This goal will be pursued as a separate •
project.
1 2
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Study
•
There are private lots that provide an additional 165 spaces in Minneapolis.
A project location map is provided as Exhibit 1 in Appendix A with parking ramp
locations shown on Exhibit 2 in Appendix A.
Subsequent to the April 2012 feasibility report, a group of Edina property owners
presented a parking expansion concept to the city that would add structured parking
to the east and west of the North Ramp. This concept addressed the business owner
and property owner concern about project cost and impacts during construction. The
property owner proposal required acquisition of the property to the east of the North
Ramp (former Edina Realty building) and to the west of the North Ramp (former
Ilooten Cleaner building). As a result of this proposal, and other considerations, the
city proceeded with this feasibility study.
This feasibility report has been developed with input from the 50th & France Business
and Professional Association (the "Association") and their members. See Section 4 —
Public Involvement for more information regarding stakeholder involvement. The
following Guiding Principles were created to help the project development process:
In order to maintain and enhance the 50`h & France district vision, to be the pre-
eminent destination for the discerning consumer desiring a charming neighborhood
experience, the following improvements should be made to the parking system and
public areas that support the viability of the local businesses.
• Provide adequate number ofparking stalls to accommodate employees and
•
customers
• Provide clean, well maintained, safe, welcoming,and accessible parking
structures
• Optimize the use of existing parking using appropriate parking management best
practices
• Provide an effective communication system to help customers navigate to
available parking stalls
• Provide opportunities to access the district via non -motorized means such as
Metro Transit, on foot and by bicycle
0 Provide a streetscape that is well maintained, accessible, safe, and continues to
reinforce the unique character and identity of the district
• Have a sustainable financing mechanism for annual maintenance, periodic
repairs and future replacement
• Mitigate construction impacts to businesses during construction, including no
construction from October 23 through January I and during the Edina Art Fair.
The proposed project recommended in this feasibility report is consistent with the
Guiding Principles. The proposed scope is generally as follows:
Add 140 to 200 new parking stalls through a public / private partnership on the
3930 West 49 Y? Street property (formerly the Edina Realty building) and / or
other sites in the 50th & France District. This goal will be pursued as a separate •
project.
1 2
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Study
2. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The following is a summary of the proposed improvements included as apart of this
project. Exhibits 3 through 6 in Appendix A further illustrate the proposed
improvements.
A. Parldng Expansion
With a goal of adding 140 to 200 new parking stalls within the district to better serve
the needs of the community, the City of Edina has purchased the property at 3930
West 49 1/2Street, formerly the Edina Realty building. The city has investigated other
possible expansion sites, including 3944 West 491/2 Street (the Hooten Cleaners site)
and the city's surface parking lot at Halifax and West 49 1/2 Street (the Clancy Lot).
At this time only the former Edina Realty building appears to be a candidate for
parking expansion.
The preferred method for adding parking is to develop street level commercial space
with new public parking provided above. In the future, the city may reach out to
potential developers to formulate a redevelopment plan that is consistent with the
vision of the 50th & France District and the goal to provide adequate public parking.
3
• Perform essential parking ramp repairs and preventative maintenance to the
parking ramps.
• Paint the interior of all parking ramps and the exterior of the South Ramp.
• Replace deteriorated pavers with more salt tolerant pavers and improve drainage
system below pavers.
• Replace dying street trees and repair planter beds.
0 Screen all garbage areas with enclosure walls (two at Middle Ramp and one at
South Ramp) and implement recycling centers.
0 New elevator and stair core in northeast corner of the South Ramp.
• Increase brightness of parking ramp lighting by replacing existing fixtures with
motion sensing LED fixtures.
a Install a dynamic public parking wayfinding system,
_
a Install an automatic underground irrigation system to serve two planter areas on
south side of Middle Ramp.
• Create easily identified pedestrian zones to and through parking ramps using floor
paint, curbs and bollards.
• Enhanced operations and maintenance of the parking ramps including power
washing all ramps once per year, improved sanitation and quarterly cleaning of all
glass.
• Add hospitality signs at the entrance and exit of parking ramps.
• Designate approximately 230 additional employee parking stalls and monitor
employee parking demand.
• Work with Metro Transit to add bus route and schedule signs, benches and bus
shelters, and possibly real-time bus arrival information.
The proposed improvements included as a part of this project are detailed in this
report along with the estimated costs, a proposed financing plan, and a proposed
schedule for the implementation of the project.
2. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The following is a summary of the proposed improvements included as apart of this
project. Exhibits 3 through 6 in Appendix A further illustrate the proposed
improvements.
A. Parldng Expansion
With a goal of adding 140 to 200 new parking stalls within the district to better serve
the needs of the community, the City of Edina has purchased the property at 3930
West 49 1/2Street, formerly the Edina Realty building. The city has investigated other
possible expansion sites, including 3944 West 491/2 Street (the Hooten Cleaners site)
and the city's surface parking lot at Halifax and West 49 1/2 Street (the Clancy Lot).
At this time only the former Edina Realty building appears to be a candidate for
parking expansion.
The preferred method for adding parking is to develop street level commercial space
with new public parking provided above. In the future, the city may reach out to
potential developers to formulate a redevelopment plan that is consistent with the
vision of the 50th & France District and the goal to provide adequate public parking.
3
ri
i
i
7
7
1
J
f
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Stud
owners ake on-line. A summary of these meetings and parking impro ht
•
survey can and in Appendix C. A customer parking survey w nducted
between Decemb 4 and December 19, 2013. The results o customer survey
can be found in Appen ' C. Kimley-Horn also requ employee work schedule
information from all busine to determine the oyee parking demand during
the week.
Many attempts were made to c
so#trct all pro owners and business owners in the
50'' & France District. ey-Horn represenvisited each business in the
district over a two- period to make initial contact istribute an invitation to
focus grou rags. Kimley-Horn and the Association se eriodic email
mess o allIsiness owners to reinforce the need for public cipation in the
sect development process, and asked for specific involvement in th eys.
Continued public involvement will be key during the final design process.
5. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Based on the Guiding Principles the following alternatives were developed by city
staff and the Project Advisory Team Through focus group meetings and an on-line
survey, business owners and property owners ranked the alternatives. See Appendix
C for the results of the business owner and property owner survey. The alternatives
are grouped by category below and listed in order of business owner and property
owner preference, from higher to lower preference. Alternatives in bold are
recommended and part of the proposed improvements. All order of magnitude costs
include indirect costs and a contingency. The alternatives below are taken from the •
Menu of Alternatives matrix found in Appendix C. The Menu of Alternatives, in
Appendix C, includes information about the Project Advisory Team's preferences
about which alternatives should be included in the preferred alternative.
A. Parking Ramp Expansion
A.1 Add parking on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites with commercial space
at ground level Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites. Order of magnitude
cost estimate; $12,000,000.
A.2 Add surface parking on Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaner sites with possible
parking ramp construction in the future. Does not include demolition or cleanup of
sites. Does not include future parking ramp costs. Assumes about 20 stalls on
Hooten Cleaner site and 30 stalls on Edina Realty site. Order of magnitude cost
estimate; $350,000.
A.3 Add parking ramp on Edina. Realty, Hooten Cleaner and Clancy Lot sites with
commercial space at ground level Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites.
Order of magnitude cost estimate; $16,000,000.
AA Add parking ramp on new sites without integrated commercial space on
ground level. Does not include demolition or cleanup of sites; 3 level expansion on
Hooten Cleaners and Edina Realty sites. Order of magnitude cost estimate;
$5,000,000. -
10
Excerpts from P-23
Notes regarding the alternatives: Feasibility Study
North Ramp Expansion Considerations
Based on conversations with property owners in the 50th and France district, the
commercial spaces, as described above, in parking ramps are not very desirable and
could likely be leased in the $15 to $20 per square foot range. Assuming a 6 percent
interest rate for the capital, the lease payments would not cover the financing cost for
the commercial space.
11
The expansion in each direction would allow for up to a three story expansion with
the floor plates matching the elevations of the existing structure. Existing vehicle
circulation within the ramps would be utilized to access the new floor plates.
Pedestrian circulation for the west expansion of the existing ramp would utilize the
existing stairs and elevator in the southwest corner. An additional stair would be
required within the east expansion of the existing ramp to provide additional
pedestrian exiting. Expansions would be constructed out of reinforced, post -
tensioned concrete matching the existing ramp. Exterior materials would match the
exterior of the existing North Ramp.
The North Ramp was originally constructed as a two level structure in 1991. A third
level was added to the structure and also expanded to the west in the 1990's. Zoning
requirements for the PCD -2 district allow height up to 48 feet or four stories through
a height overlay district. However, expansion of the structure taller than three stories
would likely require modifications to the foundations of the existing North Ramp.
Setback requirements within the PCD -2 district require expansion to be set back
twenty-five feet from the north property boundary that abuts a residential district
unless a variance is attained. Expansion onto the former Edina Realty Building site
matching parameters of the existing ramp was considered for this study and would
require a variance. Expansion onto the Hooten Cleaners site matching the existing
ramp parameters was considered for this study and would not require a variance.
Integrated Commercial /Parking Considerations
Considering the overall district, there is an expressed desire to consider the
incorporation of commercial/retail space into the ground level of parking structure
expansion. This mixed-use arrangement would provide additional commercial
property frontage on 49 1/2 Street and would minimize the impression of all parking
along 49h %2 Street. The extent of commercial space considered in this study totaled
4,850 square feet on the Hooten Cleaners site and 7,500 square feet within the Edina
Realty Building site. Creation of occupied spaces within the open air parking ramp
requires waterproofing and insulation above the commercial space as well as fire
separations, sprinklers and additional mechanical systems. In order to maximize new
-
parking stalls, commercial space for this study was configured on the ground level
only, underneath level two of the parking structures. This arrangement creates
atypical commercial space requiring a sunken floor to achieve nine foot clear ceiling
heights. When floors are sunk two to three feet below street level, ramps are required
to create access for service and pedestrians. A more optimal configuration for retail
spaces would require omitting level two in the parking structure expansion to allow
clear ceiling heights approaching 15 feet.
Based on conversations with property owners in the 50th and France district, the
commercial spaces, as described above, in parking ramps are not very desirable and
could likely be leased in the $15 to $20 per square foot range. Assuming a 6 percent
interest rate for the capital, the lease payments would not cover the financing cost for
the commercial space.
11
J.
i
Surface Parking Considerations
Excerpts from P-23
Feasibility Study
Another alternative considered is the construction of surface parking lots on either or
both of the Edina Realty and Hooten Cleaners sites. This alternative would provide
additional parking in the district and would provide time for the impact of parking
management strategies and dynamic wayfmding to be evaluated.
Construction of the surface lots would also provide more parking spaces during
construction activities to replace spaces lost due the construction work in the parking
ramps.
B. Customer Parking
B.k Free customer parking. No capital cost associated with this
B.2 courage turnover at prime customer spaces using posted time 1' is and / or
meters. ume meters for Edina on -street parking (40 stalls) and onl igns in the
ramps. Ord of magnitude cost estimate; $25,000.
B.3 Holiday s son parking strategies; additional par ambassadors and
offsite employee p g. Add two ambassadors from N 1 through January
15 from 7:30am - 7: m; Offsite employee parking o eekdays only during
shopping season, Emp ees use 125 US Bank stalls ring weekends during
holidays. Order of magm de cost estimate; $35,0 annually.
B.4 Add short term parking N customers or liveries on south side of 49 1/2
Street. Add signs and pavement m kings; D.44 not include street, sidewalk or curb
work. Order of magnitude cost esti e; $ ,000.
B.5 Add short term parking on norKsik of 51st Street. Add signs and pavement
markings; Does not include street, s ewalk\holiy
Order of magnitude cost
estimate; $10,000.
B.6 Valet parking. Four et stations; und loam - 10pm;
Assume valet parking in r ps, except durion. Order of magnitude
cost estimate; $250,000 ually.
B.7 Access co of and paid parking in Sout4 and Middle Ips with 2 or 3 hour
free parking. V anon program for additional time at business pease. Employee
parking .ontr ed by prox card and gates. No "ticket spitters" or trols for
customer p g. Order of magnitude cost estimate; $50,000.
B.S Add meters to on -street parking both in Edina and Minneapolis. ume 40
on eet stalls in Edina and 40 on -street stalls in Minneapolis. Order of matude
cot estimate; $50,000.
12
0
•
OPTION C eiZS"2 EXISTING NEW
PARKING East Expansion Concept Plan 2012
al11
l
37 ITI
ADOONAL SPACES
GROUI1) LEVEL a
I
9
❑ O _I) / rSTAiR �•
GROUND LEVEL PLAN FULL RAMP - PARKING ON 3 LEVELS - 3930 PROPERTY
3 1/32'=1'-0'
3930 49X STREET
RAMP ADDITIONAL SPACES
GROUND: 37 SPACES
SECOND LEVEL: 47 SPACES
THIRD LEVEL: 47 SPACES
TOTAL EXISTING NEW 3930 3918
131 SPACES1 11
2 '� SOUTH ELEVATION
3 1/32'=1'-0'
M ON -
n
71
o (o
�-EYA-I n//Nb
t
i J
A8o ✓� {I
LOVE arA4,*P
2gj yfAt46
A-V vev
• NS -1 2vS'C��IS S7
kD DSD
� I
Gbn/cEYT i!-
West Expansion - parking only concept 2013
3—LEVEL. I \
P/}R-k-rlv6
Gl�-DvNO LEVEL i
�LfFn/
_-
f I STDA+46 E
0
eNEvv EXISt
-4
�---XIe,;T I N &
K01 -7K �-PtMp
Exrr
4 5!'z s-rr-C--e-r
•
hr�P� r M—JAWAfLY West Expansion - parking only concept 2013
' o 1ll4LLS Lai-(' LY_ .
3 5 S'Ta-LL�5
^IPVZ-v ?t1 IL
L�t:v6L
• N P --T 5-
5?a-.t.5 A-DPE$ ■
ON Z LEVEL -5
I °o
FIP-F-- �I
WALL-
• 4:- S /N
PL�E -
�orvcR-�7E I
57/x-uG7✓RE
F�t-t Ft. ooh -
p
�tST�NG
� flDCTIflnJ / i
i
MIDDLE -LVmp- l /
LEvFL, pLAN
ifl.t.f3
a
NEW �xLyTING
G
L
•
}-
IL
4
4
m
J
V)
�/ +?
w
q -
z�
4f
V) oW
Uj?NuI
4 p
S Q
•
0
.-.. -- - - .. - .. - ..- - -..A
• � � nom. cS� Q t�i `L �W of � j �D � � t� Z � of � ' • 1 `,
L
West Expansion cost estimate 2013
City of Edina. 50th & France Ramp Expansion
3 -Level
Construction Cost Parking 27,600 SF $ 45.00 $ 1,242,000
Sitework $ 50,000
Escalation (10% of 2012 Parking Cost) $ 124,200
Contingency (20%) $ 283,240
$ 1,699,440
2-Level+Retail
Sitework
Construction Cost Parking 25,200 SF $ 45.00 $ 1,134,000
Escalation - (10% of 2012 Parking Cost) $ 113,400
Waterproofing / Roof System 8,000 SF $25 $ 200,000
Construction Cost Retail 4,850 SF $ 170.00 $ 824,500
Sitework $ 50,000
Retail Excavation for full foundation $ 16,000
Contingency (20%) $ 467,580
Demo Existing Structure
Demo Adjoining Spandrel Wall
Common Excavation
Bituminous removal
Site Grading
Footing/Foundation Excavation
Total
Retail Excavation
** Footing & Foundation
1,207 cy $ 15.00 $ 20,000.00
** Added to the "Common Excavation" above
$ 16,000.00
0
•
$ 2,805,480
50,000
CF
$
0.65
$
32,500.00
$ 32,500.00
3,000
SF
$
1.25
$
4,000.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 13,500.00
556
SY
$
4.68
$
3,100.00
367
CY
$
15.00
$
6,000.00
280
CY
$
15.00
$
4,400.00
1,207 cy $ 15.00 $ 20,000.00
** Added to the "Common Excavation" above
$ 16,000.00
0
•
Date North Ramp Center Ramp South Ra -p___
Monday 12/1/2014 59 72 80
Tuesday 12/2/2014 61 85 91
Wednesday 12/3/2014 68 89 88
Thursday 12/4/2014 67 i 99 87
Friday 12/5/2014 63 101 109
Saturday 12/6/2014 37 100 105
Sunday 12/7/2014 8 67 97
Monday 12/8/2014 53 87 91
Tuesday 12/9/2014 62 Ej=94
Wednesday 12/10/2014 65
Thursday 12/11/2014 67 Friday 12/12/2014 69
Saturday 12/13/2014 41
Sunday 12/14/2014 10 60 75
Monday 12/15/2014 57 83 9
Tuesday 12/16/2014 62 94
Wednesday 12/17/2014 74 a •1
Thursday 12/18/2014 69 104
Friday 12/19/2014 75 101 119
Saturday 12/20/2014 49 103 100
Sunday 12/21/2014 9 68 74
Monday 12/22/2014 68
Tuesday 12/23/2014 75
Wednesday 12/24/2014 29 61 81
Thursday 12/25/2014 1 24 74
Friday 12/26/2014 59 102 125
Saturday 12/27/2014 38 95 117
Sunday 12/28/2014 12 108
Monday 12/29/2014 51 98 120
Tuesday 12/30/2014 55 99 119
Wednesday 12/31/2014 53 101 112
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 269 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
Daily Peak Parking December 2014
140
120
100
_......._..
so
— —
60
\IV
40
20
0
.
ry\��~b ,�'L\�~p
'Y ti
,�3\ry�yb ry\b\ry�~b ry\y\ry�yp ry\(p\1��a \'t\ry��b \0\ry�ryb \oi\ry�ryp .YO��ryb .�'1\ry�~b ,�'L\ry�1b ,y'!\ry�~b .Yb\~�~b ,�h\ry0~� .Y6\~�ryb .Y1\ry�~b ,�0\1�vp ,�q\ryovb
ti ti ti ti Sry 'r1' S'1• .y'L\ ,'1\ .pry\ ti'� .Yn\ .�'la ,Yry\ ryry\ ,yy\ ,Yry\
,Lp\1�ryb �15\�O~p ,�•l\���b ,tip\ryO~b
,ti4V,4,t\'LO~b 3.��O,yb
N -1 1141,
.yl.y\ ,�'V .Y'Y\ ,Yy\ ,Yry\ N 4
—Percent Occupancy North Ramp —Percentage Occupancy Center Ramp —Percentage Occupancy South Ramp
Percent Occupancy
Date North Ramp Center Ramp South.
Thursday 1/1/2015 4 44 105
Friday 1/2/2015 63 104 118
Saturday 1/3/2015 35 102 118
Sunday 1/4/2015 8 59 96
Monday 1/5/2015 54 68 82
Tuesday 1/6/2015 58 83 81
Wednesday 1/7/2015 63 77 as
Thursday 1/8/2015 64 90 83
Friday 1/9/2015 49 86 �j
Saturday 1/10/2015 45 1
Sunday 1/11/2015 10 57
Monday 1/12/2015 48 73 86
Tuesday 1/13/2015 50 74 96
Wednesday 1/14/2015 68 97 109
Thursday 1/15/2015 62 99 107
Friday 1/16/2015 50 98 118
Saturday 1/17/2015 40 105
Sunday 1/18/2015 8 69 95
Monday 1/19/2015 47 95 113
Tuesday 1/20/2015 62 87 90
Wednesday 1/21/2015 62 90 97
Thursday 1/22/2015 62 98 95
Friday 1/23/2015 55 101 116
Saturday 1/24/2015 37 102
Sunday 1/25/2015 7 75 94
Monday 1/26/2015 47 70 89
Tuesday 1/27/2015 55 86 90
Wednesday 1/28/2015 53 89 92
Thursday 1/29/2015 61 90 81
Friday 1/30/2015 52 93
Saturday 1/31/2015 32 1
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 269 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
0 0 0
Daily Peak Parking January 2015
too
120.......-..--
100
..
ao
60
— _
40
20
0
1\'ti\ti�•Yy
\'L\~O•,y ,Y\3\ry�•yh ti\b\ti�,,� \y\ti�,yy ,Y\6\ti�•~y \'1\ti�•~y 1\b\ti�•Yy \oi\ti�•,y �``.�0\ti�•'y �``,y'r\ti�•yy� ``.1'Y\ti�•,�� ``.�3\ryoyy \,yb\��•,h ,yy\��•yy �``,yro\ti�,yy \.Y'�\ti�•,y \.�6\ti�•,y� `,yoi\ti�•,y
'1� Y '1� '1" 1 'ti\ '1^ 1 1 'N
\.y0\ti�•�� `,t'r\~�•yy .y'Y\ti�•yy .y'�\ti�•,y ,yb\tioyy ,ty\ryO�O ,Y6\ryP ,Y1\rypyh ,1,41\ry�,yh ,v0\�D,tih ,�O\ry�,yh ,,'r\v�•�h
1 'N '1\ 4\ 1\ 1\ 1\ 1\ 1\ 1\ 1\ 1\
-Percent Occupancy North Ramp -Percent Occupancy Center Ramp -Percent
Occupancy south Ramp
0 0 0
0 0 0
Date Occupancy North Center Ramp South Ramp
Sunday 2/1/2015 7 56 79
Monday 2/2/2015 51 70 76
Tuesday 2/3/2015 54 77 81
Wednesday 2/4/2015 55 84 91
Thursday 2/5/2015 56 86 93
Friday 2/6/2015 52 �� 1
Saturday 2/7/2015 40
Sunday 2/8/2015 7 71 94
Monday 2/9/2015 50 78 79
Tuesday 2/10/2015 51 72 72
Wednesday 2/11/2015 55 87 88
Thursday 2/12/2015 59 93 88
Friday 2/13/2015 48 97 110
Saturday 2/14/2015 47 101 123
Sunday 2/15/2015 7 76 110
Monday 2/16/2015 47 94 112
Tuesday 2/17/2015 58 7795
Wednesday 2/18/2015 57 81 86
Thursday 2/19/2015 57 110 101
Friday 2/20/2015 57 99 116
Saturday 2/21/2015 53 100 120
Sunday 2/22/2015 8 78 103
Monday 2/23/2015 50 84 85
Tuesday 2/24/2015 57 81 94
Wednesday 2/25/2015 59
Thursday 2/26/2015 62 90 94
Friday 2/27/2015 46 95 110
Saturday 2/28/2015 41 106 107
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 260 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
Daily Peak Parking February 2015
too
120
100
80
60
40
20
��\ry�yh �\�ryotih ti��\ryo1y ti�d�ryo~y ,L\h\ry�.�h ,L\6\��.yh ry�\ry�ti5 'L�4�ti�'ry 'y��'�ti�'y�,L�tiO�~'yy,'y~ryo1y,L�'�ti�~'y�,��'ti�'~o'yy,y\'yb�ti�'ry,L\'yy�ti�lh,L\'yr°�ti�1y,y\'y1�ti�'1y,y\'yg�ti�'y�,L\'tio'�ti�'ryv\'Y��ti�'yy,L\'L1�ti�'yy,L\'L1�~'~y,L\'1y�ti�'yy,L\'Lp�ti�•y'',L\'Ly�ti�•,h,L\'16�ti�,yy,L\'L1�ti�•yy �\'Lg�1�
—Percent Occupancy North Ramp —Percent Occupancy Center Ramp —Percent Occupancy South Ramp
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 260 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
Date
Ramp
Center Ramp
Ramp
Sunday
3/1/2015
7
69
80
Monday
3/2/2015
48
72
85
Tuesday
3/3/2015
58
73
78
Wednesday
3/4/2015
56
81
67
Thursday
3/5/2015
57
80
-
Friday
3/6/2015
54
Saturday
3/7/2015
45
���\~O1�
�•
Sunday
3/8/2015
10
68
83
Monday
3/9/2015
51
68
90
Tuesday
3/10/2015
55
82
93
Wednesday
3/11/2015
58
92
105
Thursday
3/12/2015
58
94
103II
Friday
3/13/2015
45
100
103
Saturday
3/14/2015
34
96
99
Sunday
3/15/2015
7
64
77
Monday
3/16/2015
50
73
89
Tuesday
3/17/2015
60
82
93
Wednesday
3/18/2015
58
87
101
Thursday
3/19/2015
62
99
95
Friday
3/20/2015
50
103
104
Saturday
3/21/2015
45
103
104
Sunday
3/22/2015
9
66
73
Monday
3/23/2015
52
65
79
Tuesday
3/24/2015
58
93
94
Wednesday
3/25/2015
61
92
Thursday
3/26/2015
58
96
101
Friday
3/27/2015
46
89
102
Saturday
3/28/2015
29
92
97
Sunday
3/29/2015
8
63
79
Monday
3/30/2015
49
68
78
Tuesday
3/31/2015
55
77
90
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 260 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
Daily Peak Parking March 2015
120
------- ------ --
100
so
---
60
40
20
-
0
���\~O1�
3�ry�ryo~h 0��\ryO~y ��p��O�h ��y�1�1y ��b\~Oyy ��\ry0tih ��'b���~�,��oi���1y�\,y0�1�~y�\,ti'1���1y�\.�'Y�1�1y�\.y^����1y�\.�b�1�yy�\,tiy���y��\,Yy����y�\,ti1���yy3\,y4���1��\,ti0�1�~y3\,ti0���~y3\,y'ti�1�~y�\,L'1�1��y�\,13�ti�•,y�\,1b�ti�•yy�\,Ly�ti�•y%'�\,yb�ti�•yh�\,y��ti�•Yy�\,10�ti�,yy�\,ti9�ti�,,h3\,,O�ti�•,5�\,�1�ti�•yy
-Percent Occupancy North Ramp -Percent Occupancy Center Ramp -Percent Occupancy South Ramp
120
100
80
60
40
20
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 260 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
Daily Peak Parking April 2015
Date
North Ramp
Occupancy
-Percent Occupancy North Ramp
Wednesday
4/1/2015
58
80
94
Thursday
4/2/2015
55
86
83
Friday
4/3/2015
45
91
Saturday
4/4/2015
32
90
81
Sunday
4/5/2015
3
10
56
Monday
4/6/2015
50
70
86
Tuesday
4/7/2015
59
79
86
Wednesday
4/8/2015
58
91
Thursday
4/9/2015
58
92
91
Friday
4/10/2015
51
102
100
Saturday
4/11/2015
30
98
99
Sunday
4/12/2015
8
73
74
Monday
4/13/2015
52
75
82
Tuesday
4/14/2015
62
94
Wednesday
4/15/2015
58
88
Thursday
4/16/2015
57
94
87
Friday
4/17/2015
52
r
Saturday
4/18/2015
33
86
II
Sunday
4/19/2015
8
59
77
Monday
4/20/2015
52
66
89
Tuesday
4/21/2015
54
73
91
Wednesday
4/22/2015
63
92
Thursday
4/23/2015
60
88
85
Friday
4/24/2015
49
Saturday
4/25/2015
34
Sunday
4/26/2015
9
64
64
Monday
4/27/2015
52
81
90
Tuesday
4/28/2015
58
80
94
Wednesday
4/29/2015
59
91
Thursday
4/30/2015
51
120
100
80
60
40
20
This chart documents the peak daily usage
in each of the three city -owned parking
structures at 50th/France.
The North Ramp has 260 stalls.
The Center Ramp has 271 stalls.
The South Ramp has 329 stalls.
Daily Peak Parking April 2015
-Percent Occupancy North Ramp
-Percent Occupancy Center Ramp
-Percent Occupancy South Ramp
5 Excerpts from April 2015 Occupancy Analysis
- Peak use is NOT simultaneous in all ramvs.
Da
Day
Date
time
percent
occupied
Location
1
Occupancy Rate
1 50% 1 60% 1 70% 1 75% 180%185%190%195% 100%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### #### ###
### #1###
Fri
4/3/15
1:00 PM
91%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Fri
4/3/15
1:00 PM
45%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
1:00 PM
94%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Fri
4/3/15
1:00 PM
78%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
2:00 PM
90%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Fri
4/3/15
2:00 PM
43%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
2:00 PM
101%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95% 100%
Fri
4/3/15
2:00 PM
80%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
3:00 PM
84%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Fri
4/3/15
3:00 PM
44%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
3:00 PM
98%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95%
Fri
4/3/15
3:00 PM
77%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
4:00 PM
72%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
Fri
4/3/15
4:00 PM
39%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
4:00 PM
86%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Fri
4/3/15
4:00 PM
67%
Total
50%
60%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
5:00 PM
71%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
Fri
4/3/15
5:00 PM
32%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
5:00 PM
78%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/3/15
5:00 PM
62%
50%
60%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
#####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
6:00 PM
66%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Fri
4/3/15
21%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
77%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/3/15
56%
50%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
7:00 PM
65%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Fri
4/3/15
15%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
80%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Fri
4/3/15
55%
50%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
8:00 PM
54%
Center Ramp
50%
Fri
4/3/15
9%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
75%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/3/15
48%
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Fri
4/3/15
9:00 PM
45%
Center Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
6%
North Ramp
Fri
4/3/15
70%
South Ramp
50%
60%
Fri
4/3/15
42%
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
### ####
Sat
4/4/15
8:00 AM
2%
Center Ramp
Sat
4/4/15
7%
North Ramp
50th France Parking Structures April 1 to 30 , 2015
Hourly Occupancy Analysis - ALL Ramps Page 5 of 61
•
u
•
•
•
•
Day
Date
time
percent
occupied
Location
Occupancy Rate
50% 1 60% 1 70% 75% 1 80%185%190%1950/,.T 1000/6
Jai
4/4/15
12%
Sat
4/4/15
8%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
13%
Sat
4/4/15
12%
Sat
4/4/15
18%
Sat
4/4/15
15%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
31%
Sat
4/4/15
19%
Sat
4/4/15
34%
Sat
4/4/15
28%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
46%
Sat
4/4/15
25%
Sat
4/4/15
55%
Sat
4/4/15
43%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
70%
Sat
4/4/15
29%
Sat
4/4/15
66%
Sat
4/4/15
56%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
1:00 PM 86%
Sat
4/4/15
31%
Sat
4/4/15
78%
Sat
4/4/15
66%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
2:00 PM 88%
Sat
4/4/15
32%
Sat
4/4/15
74%
Sat
4/4/15
65%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
3:00 PM 90%
Sat
4/4/15
29%
Sat
4/4/15
73%
Sat
4/4/15
65%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
86%
Sat
4/4/15
26%
Sat
4/4/15
64%
Sat
4/4/15
59%
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
#DIV/0!
Sat
4/4/15
75%
50th France Parking Structures
Hourly Occupancy Analysis - ALL Ramps
South Kamp
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Total
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Total
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Total
Center Ramp
North Ramp
South Ramp
Total
Center Ramp
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
50%
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
50% 60% 70%
50% 60%
50%
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
50% 60% 70% 75% 80% 85%
50%
60%
70%
75%
50%
50%
60%
####
####
####
####
####
####
#### #### ### ### ####
####
####
####
####
#### #### ### ### ####
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
50%
60%
70%
50%
60%
####
####
####
#### #### #### ### ### ####
####
####
####
#### #### #### ### ### ####
50%
60%
70%
75% 80% 85%
50% 60% 70%
50% 60%
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
50% 60% 70% 75% 80% 85%
50% 60%
50%
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
#### #### #### #### #### #### ### ### ####
50% 60% 70%
April 1 to 30 , 2015
Page 6 of 61
Da y
Date
time
percent
occupied
LocationOccupancy
Rate
50% 607/.T-70% 75% 1 80%185%190%1-95-0/,,Tl —00-/6
Wed
4/8/15
41%
North Ramp
Wed
4/8/15
53%
South Ramp
50%
Wed
4/8/15
42%
Wed
4/8/15
42%
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
###I#
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
62%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Wed
4/8/15
48%
North Ramp
Wed
4/8/15
67%
South Ramp
50%
60%
Wed
4/8/15
59%
50%
Wed
4/8/15
59%
50%
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
70%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Wed
4/8/15
49%
North Ramp
Wed
4/8/15
74%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
Wed
4/8/15
65%
50%
60%
Wed
4/8/15
65%
50%
60%
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
1:00 PM
88%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Wed
4/8/15
1:00 PM
51%
North Ramp
50%
Wed
4/8/15
1:00 PM
86%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Wed
4/8/15
1:00 PM
76%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
2:00 PM
94%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Wed
4/8/15
2:00 PM
54%
North Ramp
50%
Wed
4/8/15
2:00 PM
91%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Wed
4/8/15
2:00 PM
81%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
3:00 PM
81%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Wed
4/8/15
3:00 PM
57%
North Ramp
50%
Wed
4/8/15
3:00 PM
90%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Wed
4/8/15
3:00 PM
77%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
4:00 PM
77%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Wed
4/8/15
4:00 PM
55%
North Ramp
50%
Wed
4/8/15
4:00 PM
81%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Wed
4/8/15
4:00 PM
72%
Total
50%
60%
70%
Wed
4/8/15
4:00 PM
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Wed
4/8/15
68%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Wed
4/8/15
44%
North Ramp
Wed
4/8/15
71%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
Wed
4/8/15
62%
50%
60%
•
Wed
4/8/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
50th France Parking Structures April 1 to 30 , 2015
Hourly Occupancy Analysis - ALL Ramps Page 15 of 61
9
•
Day
Date
time
percent
occupied
Location
1
Occupancy Rate
1 50% 1 60% 1 70% 75% 180%185%190%195% 100%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/U!
####
####
####
####
##### ####
####
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
35%
Center Ramp
Thurs
4/9/15
41%
North Ramp
Thurs
4/9/15
48%
South Ramp
Thurs
4/9/15
42%
Thurs
4/9/15
42%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
68%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
50%
North Ramp
Thurs
4/9/15
67%
South Ramp
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
62%
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
62%
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ##!##
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
81%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Thurs
4/9/15
54%
North Ramp
50%
Thurs
4/9/15
71%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
Thurs
4/9/15
69%
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
69%
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
#/###
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
87%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Thurs
4/9/15
57%
North Ramp
50%
Thurs
4/9/15
86%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Thurs
4/9/15
77%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Thurs
4/9/ 15
#DIV/0 !
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
87%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Thurs
4/9/15
57%
North Ramp
50%
Thurs
4/9/15
89%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Thurs
4/9/15
78%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
3:00 PM
91%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Thurs
4/9/15
3:00 PM
57%
North Ramp
50%
Thurs
4/9/15
3 pm
87%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Thurs
4/9/15
3:00 PM
79%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Thurs
4/9/15
80%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Thurs
4/9/15
52%
North Ramp
50%
Thurs
4/9/15
76%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Thurs
4/9/15
70%
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
70%
50%
60%
Thurs
4/9/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
50th France Parking Structures
Hourly Occupancy Analysis - ALL Ramps
April 1 to 30 , 2015
Page 17 of 61
Da
Day
Date
time
percent
occupied
Location
Occupancy Rate
bU%
50% 1 60% 70% 75% 180%185%190%195% 100%
Fri
4/10/15
1:UU PM
981/0
Lenter Kamp
5U%
bU%
7U%
15%
M /o db%
UU /o `J5%
Fri
4/10/15
1:00 PM
46%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
1:00 PM
89%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Fri
4/10/15
1:00 PM
79%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
2:00 PM
101%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95%
100%
Fri
4/10/15
2:00 PM
45%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
2:00 PM
100%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95%
Fri
4/10/15
2:00 PM
83%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
3:00 PM
94%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Fri
4/10/15
3:00 PM
50%
North Ramp
50%
Fri
4/10/15
3:00 PM
97%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95%
Fri
4/10/15
3:00 PM
82%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
80%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
4:00 PM
93%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Fri
4/10/15
4:00 PM
46%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
4:00 PM
91%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Fri
4/10/15
4:00 PM
78%
Total
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
Fri
4/10/15
4/10/15
5:00 PM
5:00 PM
86%
36%
Center Ramp
North Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
Fri
4/10/15
5:00 PM
77%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/10/15
5:00 PM
67%
Total
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
79%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/10/15
25%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
78%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
Fri
4/10/15
62%
Total
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
7:00 PM
67%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
7:00 PM
19%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
7:00 PM
98%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95%
Fri
4/10/15
7:00 PM
64%
Total
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
8:00 PM
70%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
8:00 PM
12%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
8:00 PM
98%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
95%
Fri
4/10/15
8:00 PM
63%
Total
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
Fri
4/10/15
9:00 PM
62%
Center Ramp
50%
60%
Fri
4/10/15
9:00 PM
10%
North Ramp
Fri
4/10/15
9:00 PM
93%
South Ramp
50%
60%
70%
75%
80% 85%
90%
Fri
4/10/15
9:00 PM
58%
Total
50%
#DIV/0!
####
####
####
####
#### ####
###
###
####
50th France Parking Structures April 1 to 30 , 2015
Hourly Occupancy Analysis - ALL Ramps Page 19 of 61
CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY
JUNE 27 2015
11 Metropolitan Council
Various
2002-2004
8
Rental
12 West Hennepin Land Trust
Various
2007-2014
Affordable
Housing Production in
Edina
Property Name
Location
Year Built # of Affordable Units
Type
1Yorktown Continental
7151 York
1972 264
Rental
2Yorkdale Townhomes
7429 York
1977 90
Rental
30ak Glen Townhomes
5515 Oak Glen
1981 26
Rental
4 Edinborough/Centennial Lakes
York Ave & 494
1985-1990 332
Ownership
5Summit Point
5010 Summit Ave
1986 29
Rental
6South Haven
3400 Parklawn Ave
1982 100
Rental
7 Mt. Olivet Group Home
6432 Sherwood
2001 1
Rental
8Single Family Loan
5840 Zenith
2001 1
Ownership
9Single Family Loan
4840 Westbrook
2002 1
Ownership
:10 Oak Glen Townhomes
5515 Oak Glen
2002
Rental
11 Metropolitan Council
Various
2002-2004
8
Rental
12 West Hennepin Land Trust
Various
2007-2014
9
Ownership
13 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2007
2
Ownership
14 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2008
4
Ownership
15Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2009
9
Ownership
16 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2010
15
Ownership
17 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2011
15
Ownership
18 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2012
5
Ownership
19 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2013
9
Ownership
20 Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2014
8
Ownership
21Come Home 2 Edina
Various
2015
4
Ownership
2266 West
66th Street
2016
39
Rental
23Yorktown Gardens
7151 York
2016
10
Rental
24 6500 France
6500 France
2016
8
Rental
TOTAL
989
. K, "I M I I I
I 110
Funding
HUD Subsidized
HUD Subsidized
HUD Subsidized
TIF District
HUD Subsidized
HUD Subsidized
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
CDBG/Holman Consent Decree
CDBG
Recycled TIF
CDBG
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
Recycled TIF
TIF/Tax Credits
Assisted Living
Assisted Living
2
• • •
1970's
1980's
1990's
2000's
2010-2015
Proposed for 2016
Total
Number of Units Produced
354
387
100
35
56
57
3
• • •
Group Home
2000-2005 $8987000 Single Family Rehab
Oak Glen Preservation
2006-2010
2011-2015
Total Investment
$1,536,000
$2,010,000
Current Assets As of 4/30/2015 Available
for Affordable Housing Investment:
Come Home 2 Edina
Come Home 2 Edina
$4,2101000*
*50% set aside for Come Home 2 Edina, 50% set aside for other affordable housing in the community. 4
0 0 0
PHOTOS OF AFFORDABLE
HOUSING IN EDINA
0
C
C
Location: Edina
Completion: 1986
Size: 392 units
Affordable Units: 230 units
N.
•
•
s
Location:
Completion:
Size:
Affordable Units:
Edina
1990
250 units
100 units
SOUTH HAVEN
ft WAX,
t
Sloe
fiq
4
� � �4 � a tl � �^ �■■ww��'ff T Y.
1
1 it<�
SUMMIT POINT
r _
,J
• t w
SUMMIT POINT ..
14
.�
OAK GLEN
.t
cli
� ,r ♦ e
r
r ,
"'ori ".� •
0
•
•
Location: Edina
Completion: 1977
Size: 90 units
Affordable Units: 90 units
Location:
Completion:
Size:
Affordable Units:
Edina
1972
264 units
179 units
12
• • •
11-41 UN A 1 Yorktown Continental 1� s
Ian"°`�` vrarrt,sl
ss�'§"t�'�^irk...`2?jfsyx��..;..e.=<
y A n k: lateri:cf" Country Club
rr*icl.tr"�,
2. Yorkdale Townhomes
Mtnnehaha Cruet
Erlira f:mintry .
`- N 54th St
s
3. Oak Glen Townhome
'us ! ycrr!on hye
idPrv.Mr t.ve � � � Rth Ski
4. Edinborough/CentennialVY 640 St
,.
LakesIk
Brtdesen Perk rl "w ,e ez
fi r`Hwrr�
5. Summit Point
W(I(Ah51 W66tlll Fsjj Richfield
6. South Haven
F - ,Showpiq Centet
VV 701n .. ,a lY (Otti �:t
r
7. 66 West 3 $ 44
4
' ?r
6
8. Yorktown Gardens ),77th , ,.
W lag, St" for
81.,1 V.�
9. 6500 France
13
• • •
BACKGROUND
1. The City of Edina and the Metropolitan Council have worked together and
established an affordable housing goal of creating 212 new affordable housing units in
Edina by the year 2020. Since 2008, the City Council has approved 168 affordable
housing units in the community. None of these units has been built — 18 of these units
are projected to begin construction in 2015.
2. The Edina Housing Foundation was established to assist the City to fund housing
for low to moderate income families and elderly persons.
3. The Edina Housing Foundation has worked to accomplish these goals in
affordable housing. In addition to maintaining existing affordable housing in Edina,
since 1986 the Edina Housing Foundation has assisted in providing 366 new
affordable housing units in the City of Edina.
4. The City Council requested that the Edina Housing Foundation recommend an
affordable housing policy for the City.
14
• • •
POLICY
1. The City Council will require that at least 20% of the total units in new multi -family housing
developments requiring rezoning or variance(s) be sold or rented at an affordable price as
defined below:
2. The City will consider Tax Increment Financing for projects that include at least 20% of the
total units for affordable housing.
3. The City will consider fee waivers and/or modifications to SAC/WAC and/or park dedication
fees for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing.
4. The Edina Housing Foundation will consider providing financial assistance to new housing
projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing.
5. Affordable rental housing shall remain affordable for a minimum of 15 years; this
requirement shall be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant.
15
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEFINITIONS:
Rental Housing:
Either 20% of units are both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose
income is 50% or less of the area median gross income,
Or 40%
or more of units are
both
rent restricted
and occupied by persons whose
income
is 60% or less of the
area
median gross
income.
Both incomes (adjusted for family size) and rental rates (adjusted for bedroom
count and including the cost of utilities) are updated annually and published in
the Minnesota Housing website at www.,-nnnousing.g
16
• . •
2015 Income and rental limits are as follows:
Gross Incomes Gross Rents
0 0 0
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEFINITIONS:
Ownership Housing:
20% or more of units are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is
at or below the Levels set in the Minnesota Housing "Startup Program" (first time
homebuyer). This program has a sales price limit of $310,000. The Edina Housing
Foundation has set this limit at $350,000 in consideration of the high prices in Edina.
The Foundation would recommend that $350,000 be used as the acquisition limit in
this definition. The 2015 income limits as published on the Minnesota Housing
website are as follows:
1-2 person household
3 + person household
$86,600
$99,500
Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually.
W
•
•
0
rn
rq